blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fdc348b47a305c00bd8f72fce472d6cb1805c9a8 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/topology/uniform_space/cauchy.lean | 3cde6e975a9d1a4b02e58686e56f33ef16b91de4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,349 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import topology.uniform_space.basic
import topology.bases
import data.set.intervals
/-!
# Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
universes u v
open filter topological_space set classical uniform_space
open_locale classical uniformity topological_space filter
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniform_space α]
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def cauchy (f : filter α) := ne_bot f ∧ f ×ᶠ f ≤ (𝓤 α)
/-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f`
has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/
def is_complete (s : set α) := ∀f, cauchy f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃x∈s, f ≤ 𝓝 x
lemma filter.has_basis.cauchy_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s)
{f : filter α} :
cauchy f ↔ (ne_bot f ∧ (∀ i, p i → ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s i)) :=
and_congr iff.rfl $ (f.basis_sets.prod_self.le_basis_iff h).trans $
by simp only [subset_def, prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id]
lemma cauchy_iff' {f : filter α} :
cauchy f ↔ (ne_bot f ∧ (∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t∈f, ∀ x y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s)) :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff
lemma cauchy_iff {f : filter α} :
cauchy f ↔ (ne_bot f ∧ (∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t∈f, (set.prod t t) ⊆ s)) :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff.trans $
by simp only [subset_def, prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id]
lemma cauchy_map_iff {l : filter β} {f : β → α} :
cauchy (l.map f) ↔ (ne_bot l ∧ tendsto (λp:β×β, (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ᶠ l) (𝓤 α)) :=
by rw [cauchy, map_ne_bot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, tendsto]
lemma cauchy_map_iff' {l : filter β} [hl : ne_bot l] {f : β → α} :
cauchy (l.map f) ↔ tendsto (λp:β×β, (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ᶠ l) (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff.trans $ and_iff_right hl
lemma cauchy.mono {f g : filter α} [hg : ne_bot g] (h_c : cauchy f) (h_le : g ≤ f) : cauchy g :=
⟨hg, le_trans (filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩
lemma cauchy.mono' {f g : filter α} (h_c : cauchy f) (hg : ne_bot g) (h_le : g ≤ f) : cauchy g :=
h_c.mono h_le
lemma cauchy_nhds {a : α} : cauchy (𝓝 a) :=
⟨nhds_ne_bot,
calc 𝓝 a ×ᶠ 𝓝 a =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α),
set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (a, y) ∈ t})) : nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s s) :
le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs,
infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $ infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $
principal_mono.mpr $
assume ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨(hx : (x, a) ∈ s), (hy : (a, y) ∈ s)⟩, ⟨a, hx, hy⟩
... ≤ 𝓤 α : comp_le_uniformity⟩
lemma cauchy_pure {a : α} : cauchy (pure a) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono (pure_le_nhds a)
lemma filter.tendsto.cauchy_map {l : filter β} [ne_bot l] {f : β → α} {a : α}
(h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
cauchy (map f l) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono h
lemma cauchy.prod [uniform_space β] {f : filter α} {g : filter β} (hf : cauchy f) (hg : cauchy g) :
cauchy (f ×ᶠ g) :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.1.prod hg.1, _⟩,
simp only [uniformity_prod, le_inf_iff, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, ← prod_map_map_eq],
exact ⟨le_trans (prod_mono tendsto_fst tendsto_fst) hf.2,
le_trans (prod_mono tendsto_snd tendsto_snd) hg.2⟩
end
/-- The common part of the proofs of `le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp` and
`sequentially_complete.le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds`: if for any entourage `s`
one can choose a set `t ∈ f` of diameter `s` such that it contains a point `y`
with `(x, y) ∈ s`, then `f` converges to `x`. -/
lemma le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux {f : filter α} {x : α}
(adhs : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, (set.prod t t ⊆ s) ∧ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
begin
-- Consider a neighborhood `s` of `x`
assume s hs,
-- Take an entourage twice smaller than `s`
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 hs) with ⟨U, U_mem, hU⟩,
-- Take a set `t ∈ f`, `t × t ⊆ U`, and a point `y ∈ t` such that `(x, y) ∈ U`
rcases adhs U U_mem with ⟨t, t_mem, ht, y, hxy, hy⟩,
apply mem_of_superset t_mem,
-- Given a point `z ∈ t`, we have `(x, y) ∈ U` and `(y, z) ∈ t × t ⊆ U`, hence `z ∈ s`
exact (λ z hz, hU (prod_mk_mem_comp_rel hxy (ht $ mk_mem_prod hy hz)) rfl)
end
/-- If `x` is an adherent (cluster) point for a Cauchy filter `f`, then it is a limit point
for `f`. -/
lemma le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : filter α} {x : α} (hf : cauchy f)
(adhs : cluster_pt x f) : f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
begin
assume s hs,
obtain ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩ : ∃ t ∈ f, set.prod t t ⊆ s,
from (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 s hs,
use [t, t_mem, ht],
exact (forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.2 adhs _
(inter_mem_inf (mem_nhds_left x hs) t_mem ))
end
lemma le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : filter α} {x : α} (hf : cauchy f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ cluster_pt x f :=
⟨assume h, cluster_pt.of_le_nhds' h hf.1, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩
lemma cauchy.map [uniform_space β] {f : filter α} {m : α → β}
(hf : cauchy f) (hm : uniform_continuous m) : cauchy (map m f) :=
⟨hf.1.map _,
calc map m f ×ᶠ map m f = map (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (f ×ᶠ f) : filter.prod_map_map_eq
... ≤ map (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 α) : map_mono hf.right
... ≤ 𝓤 β : hm⟩
lemma cauchy.comap [uniform_space β] {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hf : cauchy f) (hm : comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
[ne_bot (comap m f)] : cauchy (comap m f) :=
⟨‹_›,
calc comap m f ×ᶠ comap m f = comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (f ×ᶠ f) : filter.prod_comap_comap_eq
... ≤ comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) : comap_mono hf.right
... ≤ 𝓤 α : hm⟩
lemma cauchy.comap' [uniform_space β] {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hf : cauchy f) (hm : comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
(hb : ne_bot (comap m f)) : cauchy (comap m f) :=
hf.comap hm
/-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function
defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that
is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/
def cauchy_seq [semilattice_sup β] (u : β → α) := cauchy (at_top.map u)
lemma cauchy_seq.tendsto_uniformity [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} (h : cauchy_seq u) :
tendsto (prod.map u u) at_top (𝓤 α) :=
by simpa only [tendsto, prod_map_map_eq', prod_at_top_at_top_eq] using h.right
lemma cauchy_seq.nonempty [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u) : nonempty β :=
@nonempty_of_ne_bot _ _ $ (map_ne_bot_iff _).1 hu.1
lemma cauchy_seq.mem_entourage {β : Type*} [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α}
(h : cauchy_seq u) {V : set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ k₀, ∀ i j, k₀ ≤ i → k₀ ≤ j → (u i, u j) ∈ V :=
begin
haveI := h.nonempty,
have := h.tendsto_uniformity, rw ← prod_at_top_at_top_eq at this,
simpa [maps_to] using at_top_basis.prod_self.tendsto_left_iff.1 this V hV
end
lemma filter.tendsto.cauchy_seq [semilattice_sup β] [nonempty β] {f : β → α} {x}
(hx : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 x)) :
cauchy_seq f :=
hx.cauchy_map
lemma cauchy_seq_const (x : α) : cauchy_seq (λ n : ℕ, x) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.cauchy_seq
lemma cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ tendsto (prod.map u u) at_top (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff'.trans $ by simp only [prod_at_top_at_top_eq, prod.map_def]
lemma cauchy_seq.comp_tendsto {γ} [semilattice_sup β] [semilattice_sup γ] [nonempty γ]
{f : β → α} (hf : cauchy_seq f) {g : γ → β} (hg : tendsto g at_top at_top) :
cauchy_seq (f ∘ g) :=
cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto.2 $ hf.tendsto_uniformity.comp (hg.prod_at_top hg)
lemma cauchy_seq.subseq_subseq_mem {V : ℕ → set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α)
{u : ℕ → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u)
{f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : tendsto f at_top at_top) (hg : tendsto g at_top at_top) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ ∀ n, ((u ∘ f ∘ φ) n, (u ∘ g ∘ φ) n) ∈ V n :=
begin
rw cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto at hu,
exact ((hu.comp $ hf.prod_at_top hg).comp tendsto_at_top_diagonal).subseq_mem hV,
end
lemma cauchy_seq_iff' {u : ℕ → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ k in at_top, k ∈ (prod.map u u) ⁻¹' V :=
by simpa only [cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto]
lemma cauchy_seq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ N, (u k, u l) ∈ V :=
by simp [cauchy_seq_iff', filter.eventually_at_top_prod_self', prod_map]
lemma cauchy_seq.prod_map {γ δ} [uniform_space β] [semilattice_sup γ] [semilattice_sup δ]
{u : γ → α} {v : δ → β}
(hu : cauchy_seq u) (hv : cauchy_seq v) : cauchy_seq (prod.map u v) :=
by simpa only [cauchy_seq, prod_map_map_eq', prod_at_top_at_top_eq] using hu.prod hv
lemma cauchy_seq.prod {γ} [uniform_space β] [semilattice_sup γ] {u : γ → α} {v : γ → β}
(hu : cauchy_seq u) (hv : cauchy_seq v) : cauchy_seq (λ x, (u x, v x)) :=
begin
haveI := hu.nonempty,
exact (hu.prod hv).mono (tendsto.prod_mk le_rfl le_rfl)
end
lemma uniform_continuous.comp_cauchy_seq {γ} [uniform_space β] [semilattice_sup γ]
{f : α → β} (hf : uniform_continuous f) {u : γ → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u) :
cauchy_seq (f ∘ u) :=
hu.map hf
lemma cauchy_seq.subseq_mem {V : ℕ → set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α)
{u : ℕ → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ ∀ n, (u $ φ (n + 1), u $ φ n) ∈ V n :=
begin
have : ∀ n, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ k, (u l, u k) ∈ V n,
{ intro n,
rw [cauchy_seq_iff] at hu,
rcases hu _ (hV n) with ⟨N, H⟩,
exact ⟨N, λ k hk l hl, H _ (le_trans hk hl) _ hk ⟩ },
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : strict_mono φ, hφ : ∀ n, ∀ l ≥ φ n, (u l, u $ φ n) ∈ V n⟩ :=
extraction_forall_of_eventually' this,
exact ⟨φ, φ_extr, λ n, hφ _ _ (φ_extr $ lt_add_one n).le⟩,
end
lemma filter.tendsto.subseq_mem_entourage {V : ℕ → set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α)
{u : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hu : tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ (u (φ 0), a) ∈ V 0 ∧ ∀ n, (u $ φ (n + 1), u $ φ n) ∈ V (n + 1) :=
begin
rcases mem_at_top_sets.1 (hu (ball_mem_nhds a (symm_le_uniformity $ hV 0))) with ⟨n, hn⟩,
rcases (hu.comp (tendsto_add_at_top_nat n)).cauchy_seq.subseq_mem (λ n, hV (n + 1))
with ⟨φ, φ_mono, hφV⟩,
exact ⟨λ k, φ k + n, φ_mono.add_const _, hn _ le_add_self, hφV⟩
end
/-- If a Cauchy sequence has a convergent subsequence, then it converges. -/
lemma tendsto_nhds_of_cauchy_seq_of_subseq
[semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u)
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} {p : filter ι} [ne_bot p]
(hf : tendsto f p at_top) {a : α} (ha : tendsto (u ∘ f) p (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a) :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hu (map_cluster_pt_of_comp hf ha)
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma filter.has_basis.cauchy_seq_iff {γ} [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α}
{p : γ → Prop} {s : γ → set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s) :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃N, ∀m n≥N, (u m, u n) ∈ s i :=
begin
rw [cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto, ← prod_at_top_at_top_eq],
refine (at_top_basis.prod_self.tendsto_iff h).trans _,
simp only [exists_prop, true_and, maps_to, preimage, subset_def, prod.forall,
mem_prod_eq, mem_set_of_eq, mem_Ici, and_imp, prod.map]
end
lemma filter.has_basis.cauchy_seq_iff' {γ} [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α}
{p : γ → Prop} {s : γ → set (α × α)} (H : (𝓤 α).has_basis p s) :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃N, ∀n≥N, (u n, u N) ∈ s i :=
begin
refine H.cauchy_seq_iff.trans ⟨λ h i hi, _, λ h i hi, _⟩,
{ exact (h i hi).imp (λ N hN n hn, hN n N hn (le_refl N)) },
{ rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity (H.mem_of_mem hi) with ⟨t, ht, ht', hts⟩,
rcases H.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨j, hj, hjt⟩,
refine (h j hj).imp (λ N hN m n hm hn, hts ⟨u N, hjt _, ht' $ hjt _⟩),
{ exact hN m hm },
{ exact hN n hn } }
end
lemma cauchy_seq_of_controlled [semilattice_sup β] [nonempty β]
(U : β → set (α × α)) (hU : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s)
{f : β → α} (hf : ∀ {N m n : β}, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (f m, f n) ∈ U N) :
cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto.2
begin
assume s hs,
rw [mem_map, mem_at_top_sets],
cases hU s hs with N hN,
refine ⟨(N, N), λ mn hmn, _⟩,
cases mn with m n,
exact hN (hf hmn.1 hmn.2)
end
/-- A complete space is defined here using uniformities. A uniform space
is complete if every Cauchy filter converges. -/
class complete_space (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] : Prop :=
(complete : ∀{f:filter α}, cauchy f → ∃x, f ≤ 𝓝 x)
lemma complete_univ {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [complete_space α] :
is_complete (univ : set α) :=
begin
assume f hf _,
rcases complete_space.complete hf with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, mem_univ x, hx⟩
end
instance complete_space.prod [uniform_space β] [complete_space α] [complete_space β] :
complete_space (α × β) :=
{ complete := λ f hf,
let ⟨x1, hx1⟩ := complete_space.complete $ hf.map uniform_continuous_fst in
let ⟨x2, hx2⟩ := complete_space.complete $ hf.map uniform_continuous_snd in
⟨(x1, x2), by rw [nhds_prod_eq, filter.prod_def];
from filter.le_lift (λ s hs, filter.le_lift' $ λ t ht,
have H1 : prod.fst ⁻¹' s ∈ f.sets := hx1 hs,
have H2 : prod.snd ⁻¹' t ∈ f.sets := hx2 ht,
filter.inter_mem H1 H2)⟩ }
/--If `univ` is complete, the space is a complete space -/
lemma complete_space_of_is_complete_univ (h : is_complete (univ : set α)) : complete_space α :=
⟨λ f hf, let ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := h f hf ((@principal_univ α).symm ▸ le_top) in ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
lemma complete_space_iff_is_complete_univ :
complete_space α ↔ is_complete (univ : set α) :=
⟨@complete_univ α _, complete_space_of_is_complete_univ⟩
lemma cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds [complete_space α] {l : filter α} [ne_bot l] :
cauchy l ↔ (∃x, l ≤ 𝓝 x) :=
⟨complete_space.complete, assume ⟨x, hx⟩, cauchy_nhds.mono hx⟩
lemma cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto [complete_space α] {l : filter β} {f : β → α} [ne_bot l] :
cauchy (l.map f) ↔ (∃x, tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) :=
cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds
/-- A Cauchy sequence in a complete space converges -/
theorem cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete [semilattice_sup β] [complete_space α]
{u : β → α} (H : cauchy_seq u) : ∃x, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x) :=
complete_space.complete H
/-- If `K` is a complete subset, then any cauchy sequence in `K` converges to a point in `K` -/
lemma cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_is_complete [semilattice_sup β] {K : set α} (h₁ : is_complete K)
{u : β → α} (h₂ : ∀ n, u n ∈ K) (h₃ : cauchy_seq u) : ∃ v ∈ K, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 v) :=
h₁ _ h₃ $ le_principal_iff.2 $ mem_map_iff_exists_image.2 ⟨univ, univ_mem,
by { simp only [image_univ], rintros _ ⟨n, rfl⟩, exact h₂ n }⟩
theorem cauchy.le_nhds_Lim [complete_space α] [nonempty α] {f : filter α} (hf : cauchy f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 (Lim f) :=
le_nhds_Lim (complete_space.complete hf)
theorem cauchy_seq.tendsto_lim [semilattice_sup β] [complete_space α] [nonempty α] {u : β → α}
(h : cauchy_seq u) :
tendsto u at_top (𝓝 $ lim at_top u) :=
h.le_nhds_Lim
lemma is_closed.is_complete [complete_space α] {s : set α}
(h : is_closed s) : is_complete s :=
λ f cf fs, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := complete_space.complete cf in
⟨x, is_closed_iff_cluster_pt.mp h x (cf.left.mono (le_inf hx fs)), hx⟩
/-- A set `s` is totally bounded if for every entourage `d` there is a finite
set of points `t` such that every element of `s` is `d`-near to some element of `t`. -/
def totally_bounded (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t : set α, finite t ∧ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d})
theorem totally_bounded_iff_subset {s : set α} : totally_bounded s ↔
∀d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t ⊆ s, finite t ∧ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d}) :=
⟨λ H d hd, begin
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hd with ⟨r, hr, rs, rd⟩,
rcases H r hr with ⟨k, fk, ks⟩,
let u := k ∩ {y | ∃ x ∈ s, (x, y) ∈ r},
choose hk f hfs hfr using λ x : u, x.coe_prop,
refine ⟨range f, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact range_subset_iff.2 hfs },
{ haveI : fintype u := (fk.inter_of_left _).fintype,
exact finite_range f },
{ intros x xs,
obtain ⟨y, hy, xy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ k, (x, y) ∈ r, from mem_bUnion_iff.1 (ks xs),
rw [bUnion_range, mem_Union],
set z : ↥u := ⟨y, hy, ⟨x, xs, xy⟩⟩,
exact ⟨z, rd $ mem_comp_rel.2 ⟨y, xy, rs (hfr z)⟩⟩ }
end,
λ H d hd, let ⟨t, _, ht⟩ := H d hd in ⟨t, ht⟩⟩
lemma totally_bounded_of_forall_symm {s : set α}
(h : ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, symmetric_rel V → ∃ t : set α, finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y V) :
totally_bounded s :=
begin
intros V V_in,
rcases h _ (symmetrize_mem_uniformity V_in) (symmetric_symmetrize_rel V) with ⟨t, tfin, h⟩,
refine ⟨t, tfin, subset.trans h _⟩,
mono,
intros x x_in z z_in,
exact z_in.right
end
lemma totally_bounded_subset {s₁ s₂ : set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h : totally_bounded s₂) : totally_bounded s₁ :=
assume d hd, let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h d hd in ⟨t, ht₁, subset.trans hs ht₂⟩
lemma totally_bounded_empty : totally_bounded (∅ : set α) :=
λ d hd, ⟨∅, finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩
/-- The closure of a totally bounded set is totally bounded. -/
lemma totally_bounded.closure {s : set α} (h : totally_bounded s) :
totally_bounded (closure s) :=
assume t ht,
let ⟨t', ht', hct', htt'⟩ := mem_uniformity_is_closed ht, ⟨c, hcf, hc⟩ := h t' ht' in
⟨c, hcf,
calc closure s ⊆ closure (⋃ (y : α) (H : y ∈ c), {x : α | (x, y) ∈ t'}) : closure_mono hc
... = _ : is_closed.closure_eq $ is_closed_bUnion hcf $ assume i hi,
continuous_iff_is_closed.mp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const) _ hct'
... ⊆ _ : bUnion_subset $ assume i hi, subset.trans (assume x, @htt' (x, i))
(subset_bUnion_of_mem hi)⟩
/-- The image of a totally bounded set under a unifromly continuous map is totally bounded. -/
lemma totally_bounded.image [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hs : totally_bounded s) (hf : uniform_continuous f) : totally_bounded (f '' s) :=
assume t ht,
have {p:α×α | (f p.1, f p.2) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓤 α,
from hf ht,
let ⟨c, hfc, hct⟩ := hs _ this in
⟨f '' c, hfc.image f,
begin
simp [image_subset_iff],
simp [subset_def] at hct,
intros x hx, simp,
exact hct x hx
end⟩
lemma ultrafilter.cauchy_of_totally_bounded {s : set α} (f : ultrafilter α)
(hs : totally_bounded s) (h : ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s) : cauchy (f : filter α) :=
⟨f.ne_bot', assume t ht,
let ⟨t', ht'₁, ht'_symm, ht'_t⟩ := comp_symm_of_uniformity ht in
let ⟨i, hi, hs_union⟩ := hs t' ht'₁ in
have (⋃y∈i, {x | (x,y) ∈ t'}) ∈ f,
from mem_of_superset (le_principal_iff.mp h) hs_union,
have ∃y∈i, {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} ∈ f,
from (ultrafilter.finite_bUnion_mem_iff hi).1 this,
let ⟨y, hy, hif⟩ := this in
have set.prod {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} ⊆ comp_rel t' t',
from assume ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨(h₁ : (x₁, y) ∈ t'), (h₂ : (x₂, y) ∈ t')⟩,
⟨y, h₁, ht'_symm h₂⟩,
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod hif hif) (subset.trans this ht'_t)⟩
lemma totally_bounded_iff_filter {s : set α} :
totally_bounded s ↔ (∀f, ne_bot f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃c ≤ f, cauchy c) :=
begin
split,
{ introsI H f hf hfs,
exact ⟨ultrafilter.of f, ultrafilter.of_le f,
(ultrafilter.of f).cauchy_of_totally_bounded H ((ultrafilter.of_le f).trans hfs)⟩ },
{ intros H d hd,
contrapose! H with hd_cover,
set f := ⨅ t : finset α, 𝓟 (s \ ⋃ y ∈ t, {x | (x, y) ∈ d}),
have : ne_bot f,
{ refine infi_ne_bot_of_directed' (directed_of_sup _) _,
{ intros t₁ t₂ h,
exact principal_mono.2 (diff_subset_diff_right $ bUnion_subset_bUnion_left h) },
{ intro t,
simpa [nonempty_diff] using hd_cover t t.finite_to_set } },
have : f ≤ 𝓟 s, from infi_le_of_le ∅ (by simp),
refine ⟨f, ‹_›, ‹_›, λ c hcf hc, _⟩,
rcases mem_prod_same_iff.1 (hc.2 hd) with ⟨m, hm, hmd⟩,
have : m ∩ s ∈ c, from inter_mem hm (le_principal_iff.mp (hcf.trans ‹_›)),
rcases hc.1.nonempty_of_mem this with ⟨y, hym, hys⟩,
set ys := ⋃ y' ∈ ({y} : finset α), {x | (x, y') ∈ d},
have : m ⊆ ys, by simpa [ys] using λ x hx, hmd (mk_mem_prod hx hym),
have : c ≤ 𝓟 (s \ ys) := hcf.trans (infi_le_of_le {y} le_rfl),
refine hc.1.ne (empty_mem_iff_bot.mp _),
filter_upwards [le_principal_iff.1 this, hm],
refine λ x hx hxm, hx.2 _,
simpa [ys] using hmd (mk_mem_prod hxm hym) }
end
lemma totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} :
totally_bounded s ↔ (∀f : ultrafilter α, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → cauchy (f : filter α)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hs f, f.cauchy_of_totally_bounded hs, λ H, totally_bounded_iff_filter.2 _⟩,
introsI f hf hfs,
exact ⟨ultrafilter.of f, ultrafilter.of_le f, H _ ((ultrafilter.of_le f).trans hfs)⟩
end
lemma compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete {s : set α} :
is_compact s ↔ totally_bounded s ∧ is_complete s :=
⟨λ hs, ⟨totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter.2 (λ f hf,
let ⟨x, xs, fx⟩ := is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.1 hs f hf in cauchy_nhds.mono fx),
λ f fc fs,
let ⟨a, as, fa⟩ := @hs f fc.1 fs in
⟨a, as, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp fc fa⟩⟩,
λ ⟨ht, hc⟩, is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.2
(λf hf, hc _ (totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter.1 ht f hf) hf)⟩
lemma is_compact.totally_bounded {s : set α} (h : is_compact s) : totally_bounded s :=
(compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 h).1
lemma is_compact.is_complete {s : set α} (h : is_compact s) : is_complete s :=
(compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 h).2
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance complete_of_compact {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [compact_space α] : complete_space α :=
⟨λf hf, by simpa using (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 compact_univ).2 f hf⟩
lemma compact_of_totally_bounded_is_closed [complete_space α] {s : set α}
(ht : totally_bounded s) (hc : is_closed s) : is_compact s :=
(@compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete α _ s).2 ⟨ht, hc.is_complete⟩
/-!
### Sequentially complete space
In this section we prove that a uniform space is complete provided that it is sequentially complete
(i.e., any Cauchy sequence converges) and its uniformity filter admits a countable generating set.
In particular, this applies to (e)metric spaces, see the files `topology/metric_space/emetric_space`
and `topology/metric_space/basic`.
More precisely, we assume that there is a sequence of entourages `U_n` such that any other
entourage includes one of `U_n`. Then any Cauchy filter `f` generates a decreasing sequence of
sets `s_n ∈ f` such that `s_n × s_n ⊆ U_n`. Choose a sequence `x_n∈s_n`. It is easy to show
that this is a Cauchy sequence. If this sequence converges to some `a`, then `f ≤ 𝓝 a`. -/
namespace sequentially_complete
variables {f : filter α} (hf : cauchy f) {U : ℕ → set (α × α)}
(U_mem : ∀ n, U n ∈ 𝓤 α) (U_le : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s)
open set finset
noncomputable theory
/-- An auxiliary sequence of sets approximating a Cauchy filter. -/
def set_seq_aux (n : ℕ) : {s : set α // ∃ (_ : s ∈ f), s.prod s ⊆ U n } :=
indefinite_description _ $ (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 (U n) (U_mem n)
/-- Given a Cauchy filter `f` and a sequence `U` of entourages, `set_seq` provides
an antitone sequence of sets `s n ∈ f` such that `(s n).prod (s n) ⊆ U`. -/
def set_seq (n : ℕ) : set α := ⋂ m ∈ Iic n, (set_seq_aux hf U_mem m).val
lemma set_seq_mem (n : ℕ) : set_seq hf U_mem n ∈ f :=
(bInter_mem (finite_le_nat n)).2 (λ m _, (set_seq_aux hf U_mem m).2.fst)
lemma set_seq_mono ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m ≤ n) : set_seq hf U_mem n ⊆ set_seq hf U_mem m :=
bInter_subset_bInter_left (λ k hk, le_trans hk h)
lemma set_seq_sub_aux (n : ℕ) : set_seq hf U_mem n ⊆ set_seq_aux hf U_mem n :=
bInter_subset_of_mem right_mem_Iic
lemma set_seq_prod_subset {N m n} (hm : N ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ n) :
(set_seq hf U_mem m).prod (set_seq hf U_mem n) ⊆ U N :=
begin
assume p hp,
refine (set_seq_aux hf U_mem N).2.snd ⟨_, _⟩;
apply set_seq_sub_aux,
exact set_seq_mono hf U_mem hm hp.1,
exact set_seq_mono hf U_mem hn hp.2
end
/-- A sequence of points such that `seq n ∈ set_seq n`. Here `set_seq` is an antitone
sequence of sets `set_seq n ∈ f` with diameters controlled by a given sequence
of entourages. -/
def seq (n : ℕ) : α := some $ hf.1.nonempty_of_mem (set_seq_mem hf U_mem n)
lemma seq_mem (n : ℕ) : seq hf U_mem n ∈ set_seq hf U_mem n :=
some_spec $ hf.1.nonempty_of_mem (set_seq_mem hf U_mem n)
lemma seq_pair_mem ⦃N m n : ℕ⦄ (hm : N ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ n) :
(seq hf U_mem m, seq hf U_mem n) ∈ U N :=
set_seq_prod_subset hf U_mem hm hn ⟨seq_mem hf U_mem m, seq_mem hf U_mem n⟩
include U_le
theorem seq_is_cauchy_seq : cauchy_seq $ seq hf U_mem :=
cauchy_seq_of_controlled U U_le $ seq_pair_mem hf U_mem
/-- If the sequence `sequentially_complete.seq` converges to `a`, then `f ≤ 𝓝 a`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : tendsto (seq hf U_mem) at_top (𝓝 a)) :
f ≤ 𝓝 a :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
begin
assume s hs,
rcases U_le s hs with ⟨m, hm⟩,
rcases tendsto_at_top'.1 ha _ (mem_nhds_left a (U_mem m)) with ⟨n, hn⟩,
refine ⟨set_seq hf U_mem (max m n), set_seq_mem hf U_mem _, _,
seq hf U_mem (max m n), _, seq_mem hf U_mem _⟩,
{ have := le_max_left m n,
exact set.subset.trans (set_seq_prod_subset hf U_mem this this) hm },
{ exact hm (hn _ $ le_max_right m n) }
end
end sequentially_complete
namespace uniform_space
open sequentially_complete
variables [is_countably_generated (𝓤 α)]
/-- A uniform space is complete provided that (a) its uniformity filter has a countable basis;
(b) any sequence satisfying a "controlled" version of the Cauchy condition converges. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (U : ℕ → set (α × α)) (U_mem : ∀ n, U n ∈ 𝓤 α)
(HU : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (u m, u n) ∈ U N) → ∃ a, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)) :
complete_space α :=
begin
obtain ⟨U', U'_mono, hU'⟩ := (𝓤 α).exists_antitone_seq,
have Hmem : ∀ n, U n ∩ U' n ∈ 𝓤 α,
from λ n, inter_mem (U_mem n) (hU'.2 ⟨n, subset.refl _⟩),
refine ⟨λ f hf, (HU (seq hf Hmem) (λ N m n hm hn, _)).imp $
le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds _ _ (λ s hs, _)⟩,
{ rcases (hU'.1 hs) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, subset.trans (inter_subset_right _ _) hN⟩ },
{ exact inter_subset_left _ _ (seq_pair_mem hf Hmem hm hn) }
end
/-- A sequentially complete uniform space with a countable basis of the uniformity filter is
complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto
(H' : ∀ u : ℕ → α, cauchy_seq u → ∃a, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)) :
complete_space α :=
let ⟨U', U'_mono, hU'⟩ := (𝓤 α).exists_antitone_seq in
complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences U' (λ n, hU'.2 ⟨n, subset.refl _⟩)
(λ u hu, H' u $ cauchy_seq_of_controlled U' (λ s hs, hU'.1 hs) hu)
variable (α)
@[priority 100]
instance first_countable_topology : first_countable_topology α :=
⟨λ a, by { rw nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, apply_instance }⟩
/-- A separable uniform space with countably generated uniformity filter is second countable:
one obtains a countable basis by taking the balls centered at points in a dense subset,
and with rational "radii" from a countable open symmetric antitone basis of `𝓤 α`. We do not
register this as an instance, as there is already an instance going in the other direction
from second countable spaces to separable spaces, and we want to avoid loops. -/
lemma second_countable_of_separable [separable_space α] : second_countable_topology α :=
begin
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd⟩,
obtain ⟨t : ℕ → set (α × α),
hto : ∀ (i : ℕ), t i ∈ (𝓤 α).sets ∧ is_open (t i) ∧ symmetric_rel (t i),
h_basis : (𝓤 α).has_antitone_basis (λ _, true) t⟩ :=
(@uniformity_has_basis_open_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis,
refine ⟨⟨⋃ (x ∈ s), range (λ k, ball x (t k)), hsc.bUnion (λ x hx, countable_range _), _⟩⟩,
refine (is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds _ _).eq_generate_from,
{ simp only [mem_bUnion_iff, mem_range],
rintros _ ⟨x, hxs, k, rfl⟩,
exact is_open_ball x (hto k).2.1 },
{ intros x V hxV hVo,
simp only [mem_bUnion_iff, mem_range, exists_prop],
rcases uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff.1 (is_open.mem_nhds hVo hxV) with ⟨U, hU, hUV⟩,
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hU with ⟨U', hU', hsymm, hUU'⟩,
rcases h_basis.to_has_basis.mem_iff.1 hU' with ⟨k, -, hk⟩,
rcases hsd.inter_open_nonempty (ball x $ t k) (uniform_space.is_open_ball x (hto k).2.1)
⟨x, uniform_space.mem_ball_self _ (hto k).1⟩ with ⟨y, hxy, hys⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, hys, k, rfl⟩, (hto k).2.2.subset hxy, λ z hz, _⟩,
exact hUV (ball_subset_of_comp_subset (hk hxy) hUU' (hk hz)) }
end
end uniform_space
|
2ef954d844edb7d3bd9adc97eb2817a7141f4fad | aa5a655c05e5359a70646b7154e7cac59f0b4132 | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Match.lean | fdd3cebcc67d2318af15fabffc401e6e229528fe | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lambdaxymox/lean4 | ae943c960a42247e06eff25c35338268d07454cb | 278d47c77270664ef29715faab467feac8a0f446 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,891,867,340 | 1,612,500,005,000 | 1,612,500,005,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,184 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Parser.Term
import Lean.Elab.Match
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Induction
namespace Lean.Elab.Tactic
structure AuxMatchTermState where
nextIdx : Nat := 1
«cases» : Array Syntax := #[]
private def mkAuxiliaryMatchTermAux (parentTag : Name) (matchTac : Syntax) : StateT AuxMatchTermState MacroM Syntax := do
let matchAlts := matchTac[4]
let alts := matchAlts[0].getArgs
let newAlts ← alts.mapM fun alt => do
let alt := alt.setKind ``Parser.Term.matchAlt
let holeOrTacticSeq := alt[3]
if holeOrTacticSeq.isOfKind ``Parser.Term.syntheticHole then
pure alt
else if holeOrTacticSeq.isOfKind ``Parser.Term.hole then
let s ← get
let tag := if alts.size > 1 then parentTag ++ (`match).appendIndexAfter s.nextIdx else parentTag
let holeName := mkIdentFrom holeOrTacticSeq tag
let newHole ← `(?$holeName:ident)
modify fun s => { s with nextIdx := s.nextIdx + 1}
pure $ alt.setArg 3 newHole
else withFreshMacroScope do
let newHole ← `(?rhs)
let newHoleId := newHole[1]
let newCase ← `(tactic| case $newHoleId => $holeOrTacticSeq:tacticSeq )
modify fun s => { s with cases := s.cases.push newCase }
pure $ alt.setArg 3 newHole
let result := matchTac.setKind ``Parser.Term.«match»
let result := result.setArg 4 (mkNode ``Parser.Term.matchAlts #[mkNullNode newAlts])
pure result
private def mkAuxiliaryMatchTerm (parentTag : Name) (matchTac : Syntax) : MacroM (Syntax × Array Syntax) := do
let (matchTerm, s) ← mkAuxiliaryMatchTermAux parentTag matchTac |>.run {}
pure (matchTerm, s.cases)
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.match]
def evalMatch : Tactic := fun stx => do
let tag ← getMainTag
let (matchTerm, cases) ← liftMacroM $ mkAuxiliaryMatchTerm tag stx
let refineMatchTerm ← `(tactic| refine $matchTerm)
let stxNew := mkNullNode (#[refineMatchTerm] ++ cases)
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ evalTactic stxNew
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
d71f958498f01ec6707a60b550c8cf28a5a1dcf2 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/order/heyting/regular.lean | fbacda636ccd0d26f8f3ae79d322be651ee0001c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,592 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import order.galois_connection
/-!
# Heyting regular elements
This file defines Heyting regular elements, elements of an Heyting algebra that are their own double
complement, and proves that they form a boolean algebra.
From a logic standpoint, this means that we can perform classical logic within intuitionistic logic
by simply double-negating all propositions. This is practical for synthetic computability theory.
## Main declarations
* `is_regular`: `a` is Heyting-regular if `aᶜᶜ = a`.
* `regular`: The subtype of Heyting-regular elements.
* `regular.boolean_algebra`: Heyting-regular elements form a boolean algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
-/
open function
variables {α : Type*}
namespace heyting
section has_compl
variables [has_compl α] {a : α}
/-- An element of an Heyting algebra is regular if its double complement is itself. -/
def is_regular (a : α) : Prop := aᶜᶜ = a
protected lemma is_regular.eq : is_regular a → aᶜᶜ = a := id
instance is_regular.decidable_pred [decidable_eq α] : @decidable_pred α is_regular :=
λ _, ‹decidable_eq α› _ _
end has_compl
section heyting_algebra
variables [heyting_algebra α] {a b : α}
lemma is_regular_bot : is_regular (⊥ : α) := by rw [is_regular, compl_bot, compl_top]
lemma is_regular_top : is_regular (⊤ : α) := by rw [is_regular, compl_top, compl_bot]
lemma is_regular.inf (ha : is_regular a) (hb : is_regular b) : is_regular (a ⊓ b) :=
by rw [is_regular, compl_compl_inf_distrib, ha.eq, hb.eq]
lemma is_regular.himp (ha : is_regular a) (hb : is_regular b) : is_regular (a ⇨ b) :=
by rw [is_regular, compl_compl_himp_distrib, ha.eq, hb.eq]
lemma is_regular_compl (a : α) : is_regular aᶜ := compl_compl_compl _
protected lemma is_regular.disjoint_compl_left_iff (ha : is_regular a) : disjoint aᶜ b ↔ b ≤ a :=
by rw [←le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, ha.eq]
protected lemma is_regular.disjoint_compl_right_iff (hb : is_regular b) : disjoint a bᶜ ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [←le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, hb.eq]
/-- A Heyting algebra with regular excluded middle is a boolean algebra. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def _root_.boolean_algebra.of_regular (h : ∀ a : α, is_regular (a ⊔ aᶜ)) : boolean_algebra α :=
have ∀ a : α, is_compl a aᶜ := λ a, ⟨disjoint_compl_right, codisjoint_iff.2 $
by erw [←(h a).eq, compl_sup, inf_compl_eq_bot, compl_bot]⟩,
{ himp_eq := λ a b, eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c,
le_himp_iff.trans ((this _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le).symm,
inf_compl_le_bot := λ a, (this _).1.le_bot,
top_le_sup_compl := λ a, (this _).2.top_le,
..‹heyting_algebra α›, ..generalized_heyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice }
variables (α)
/-- The boolean algebra of Heyting regular elements. -/
def regular : Type* := {a : α // is_regular a}
variables {α}
namespace regular
instance : has_coe (regular α) α := coe_subtype
lemma coe_injective : injective (coe : regular α → α) := subtype.coe_injective
@[simp] lemma coe_inj {a b : regular α} : (a : α) = b ↔ a = b := subtype.coe_inj
instance : has_top (regular α) := ⟨⟨⊤, is_regular_top⟩⟩
instance : has_bot (regular α) := ⟨⟨⊥, is_regular_bot⟩⟩
instance : has_inf (regular α) := ⟨λ a b, ⟨a ⊓ b, a.2.inf b.2⟩⟩
instance : has_himp (regular α) := ⟨λ a b, ⟨a ⇨ b, a.2.himp b.2⟩⟩
instance : has_compl (regular α) := ⟨λ a, ⟨aᶜ, is_regular_compl _⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_top : ((⊤ : regular α) : α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bot : ((⊥ : regular α) : α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inf (a b : regular α) : (↑(a ⊓ b) : α) = a ⊓ b := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_himp (a b : regular α) : (↑(a ⇨ b) : α) = a ⇨ b := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_compl (a : regular α) : (↑(aᶜ) : α) = aᶜ := rfl
instance : inhabited (regular α) := ⟨⊥⟩
instance : semilattice_inf (regular α) := coe_injective.semilattice_inf _ coe_inf
instance : bounded_order (regular α) := bounded_order.lift coe (λ _ _, id) coe_top coe_bot
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe {a b : regular α} : (a : α) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe {a b : regular α} : (a : α) < b ↔ a < b := iff.rfl
/-- **Regularization** of `a`. The smallest regular element greater than `a`. -/
def to_regular : α →o regular α :=
⟨λ a, ⟨aᶜᶜ, is_regular_compl _⟩, λ a b h, coe_le_coe.1 $ compl_le_compl $ compl_le_compl h⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_to_regular (a : α) : (to_regular a : α) = aᶜᶜ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_regular_coe (a : regular α) : to_regular (a : α) = a := coe_injective a.2
/-- The Galois insertion between `regular.to_regular` and `coe`. -/
def gi : galois_insertion to_regular (coe : regular α → α) :=
{ choice := λ a ha, ⟨a, ha.antisymm le_compl_compl⟩,
gc := λ a b, coe_le_coe.symm.trans $
⟨le_compl_compl.trans, λ h, (compl_anti $ compl_anti h).trans_eq b.2⟩,
le_l_u := λ _, le_compl_compl,
choice_eq := λ a ha, coe_injective $ le_compl_compl.antisymm ha }
instance : lattice (regular α) := gi.lift_lattice
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sup (a b : regular α) : (↑(a ⊔ b) : α) = (a ⊔ b)ᶜᶜ := rfl
instance : boolean_algebra (regular α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ a b c, coe_le_coe.1 $ by { dsimp, rw [sup_inf_left, compl_compl_inf_distrib] },
inf_compl_le_bot := λ a, coe_le_coe.1 $ disjoint_iff_inf_le.1 disjoint_compl_right,
top_le_sup_compl := λ a, coe_le_coe.1 $
by { dsimp, rw [compl_sup, inf_compl_eq_bot, compl_bot], refl },
himp_eq := λ a b, coe_injective begin
dsimp,
rw [compl_sup, a.prop.eq],
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (λ c, le_himp_iff.trans _),
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_left_comm, b.prop.disjoint_compl_left_iff],
end,
..regular.lattice, ..regular.bounded_order, ..regular.has_himp,
..regular.has_compl }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sdiff (a b : regular α) : (↑(a \ b) : α) = a ⊓ bᶜ := rfl
end regular
end heyting_algebra
variables [boolean_algebra α]
lemma is_regular_of_boolean : ∀ a : α, is_regular a := compl_compl
/-- A decidable proposition is intuitionistically Heyting-regular. -/
@[nolint decidable_classical]
lemma is_regular_of_decidable (p : Prop) [decidable p] : is_regular p :=
propext $ decidable.not_not_iff _
end heyting
|
06479dd8cab279d3e89bdba3db9c4c243c588c35 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/t14.lean | d2b170c0829f600418d5f8e4ed8b4a53b82aee7a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 485 | lean | prelude namespace foo
constant A : Type.{1}
constant a : A
constant x : A
constant c : A
end foo
section
open foo (renaming a->b x->y) (hiding c)
check b
check y
check c -- Error
end
section
open foo (a x)
check a
check x
check c -- Error
end
section
open foo (a x) (hiding c) -- Error
end
section
open foo
check a
check c
check A
end
namespace foo
constant f : A → A → A
infix ` * `:75 := f
end foo
section
open foo
check a * c
end
|
ebbed2f046c806c5b2fad986b76e1f204137a307 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/measure_theory/function/conditional_expectation/real.lean | a93d5a547b9e7ddc10e322ae737ec99d1663fff7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,712 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.indicator
import measure_theory.function.uniform_integrable
import measure_theory.decomposition.radon_nikodym
/-!
# Conditional expectation of real-valued functions
This file proves some results regarding the conditional expectation of real-valued functions.
## Main results
* `measure_theory.rn_deriv_ae_eq_condexp`: the conditional expectation `μ[f | m]` is equal to the
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `fμ` restricted on `m` with respect to `μ` restricted on `m`.
* `measure_theory.integrable.uniform_integrable_condexp`: the conditional expectation of a function
form a uniformly integrable class.
* `measure_theory.condexp_strongly_measurable_mul`: the pull-out property of the conditional
expectation.
-/
noncomputable theory
open topological_space measure_theory.Lp filter continuous_linear_map
open_locale nnreal ennreal topological_space big_operators measure_theory
namespace measure_theory
variables {α : Type*} {m m0 : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α}
lemma rn_deriv_ae_eq_condexp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : sigma_finite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : integrable f μ) :
signed_measure.rn_deriv ((μ.with_densityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f | m] :=
begin
refine ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_set_integral_eq hm hf _ _ _,
{ exact λ _ _ _, (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm (signed_measure.integrable_rn_deriv
((μ.with_densityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrable_on },
{ intros s hs hlt,
conv_rhs { rw [← hf.with_densityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← signed_measure.with_densityᵥ_rn_deriv_eq ((μ.with_densityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.with_densityᵥ_trim_absolutely_continuous hm)], },
rw [with_densityᵥ_apply
(signed_measure.integrable_rn_deriv ((μ.with_densityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← set_integral_trim hm _ hs],
exact (signed_measure.measurable_rn_deriv _ _).strongly_measurable },
{ exact strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable'
(signed_measure.measurable_rn_deriv _ _).strongly_measurable },
end
-- TODO: the following couple of lemmas should be generalized and proved using Jensen's inequality
-- for the conditional expectation (not in mathlib yet) .
lemma snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm (f : α → ℝ) :
snorm (μ[f | m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm f 1 μ :=
begin
by_cases hf : integrable f μ,
swap, { rw [condexp_undef hf, snorm_zero], exact zero_le _ },
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0,
swap, { rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, snorm_zero], exact zero_le _ },
by_cases hsig : sigma_finite (μ.trim hm),
swap, { rw [condexp_of_not_sigma_finite hm hsig, snorm_zero], exact zero_le _ },
calc snorm (μ[f | m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm (μ[|f| | m]) 1 μ :
begin
refine snorm_mono_ae _,
filter_upwards [@condexp_mono _ m m0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf hf.abs
(@ae_of_all _ m0 _ μ (λ x, le_abs_self (f x) : ∀ x, f x ≤ |f x|)),
eventually_le.trans (condexp_neg f).symm.le
(@condexp_mono _ m m0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf.neg hf.abs
(@ae_of_all _ m0 _ μ (λ x, neg_le_abs_self (f x) : ∀ x, -f x ≤ |f x|)))] with x hx₁ hx₂,
exact abs_le_abs hx₁ hx₂,
end
... = snorm f 1 μ :
begin
rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm,
← ennreal.to_real_eq_to_real (ne_of_lt integrable_condexp.2) (ne_of_lt hf.2),
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
(strongly_measurable_condexp.mono hm).ae_strongly_measurable,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.1],
simp_rw [real.norm_eq_abs],
rw ← @integral_condexp _ _ _ _ _ m m0 μ _ hm hsig hf.abs,
refine integral_congr_ae _,
have : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[|f| | m],
{ rw ← @condexp_zero α ℝ _ _ _ m m0 μ,
exact condexp_mono (integrable_zero _ _ _) hf.abs
(@ae_of_all _ m0 _ μ (λ x, abs_nonneg (f x) : ∀ x, 0 ≤ |f x|)) },
filter_upwards [this] with x hx,
exact abs_eq_self.2 hx
end
end
lemma integral_abs_condexp_le (f : α → ℝ) :
∫ x, |μ[f | m] x| ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, |f x| ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0,
swap,
{ simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_zero],
exact integral_nonneg (λ x, abs_nonneg _) },
by_cases hfint : integrable f μ,
swap,
{ simp only [condexp_undef hfint, pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_const,
algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero],
exact integral_nonneg (λ x, abs_nonneg _) },
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae],
{ rw ennreal.to_real_le_to_real;
simp_rw [← real.norm_eq_abs, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm],
{ rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, ← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm],
exact snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm _ },
{ exact ne_of_lt integrable_condexp.2 },
{ exact ne_of_lt hfint.2 } },
{ exact eventually_of_forall (λ x, abs_nonneg _) },
{ simp_rw ← real.norm_eq_abs,
exact hfint.1.norm },
{ exact eventually_of_forall (λ x, abs_nonneg _) },
{ simp_rw ← real.norm_eq_abs,
exact (strongly_measurable_condexp.mono hm).ae_strongly_measurable.norm }
end
lemma set_integral_abs_condexp_le {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set[m] s) (f : α → ℝ) :
∫ x in s, |μ[f | m] x| ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in s, |f x| ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hnm : m ≤ m0,
swap,
{ simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hnm, pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_zero],
exact integral_nonneg (λ x, abs_nonneg _) },
by_cases hfint : integrable f μ,
swap,
{ simp only [condexp_undef hfint, pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_const,
algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero],
exact integral_nonneg (λ x, abs_nonneg _) },
have : ∫ x in s, |μ[f | m] x| ∂μ = ∫ x, |μ[s.indicator f | m] x| ∂μ,
{ rw ← integral_indicator,
swap, { exact hnm _ hs },
refine integral_congr_ae _,
have : (λ x, |μ[s.indicator f | m] x|) =ᵐ[μ] λ x, |s.indicator (μ[f | m]) x| :=
eventually_eq.fun_comp (condexp_indicator hfint hs) _,
refine eventually_eq.trans (eventually_of_forall $ λ x, _) this.symm,
rw [← real.norm_eq_abs, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm],
refl },
rw [this, ← integral_indicator],
swap, { exact hnm _ hs },
refine (integral_abs_condexp_le _).trans (le_of_eq $ integral_congr_ae $
eventually_of_forall $ λ x, _),
rw [← real.norm_eq_abs, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm],
refl,
end
/-- If the real valued function `f` is bounded almost everywhere by `R`, then so is its conditional
expectation. -/
lemma ae_bdd_condexp_of_ae_bdd {R : ℝ≥0} {f : α → ℝ}
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, |f x| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, |μ[f | m] x| ≤ R :=
begin
by_cases hnm : m ≤ m0,
swap,
{ simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hnm, pi.zero_apply, abs_zero],
refine eventually_of_forall (λ x, R.coe_nonneg) },
by_cases hfint : integrable f μ,
swap,
{ simp_rw [condexp_undef hfint],
filter_upwards [hbdd] with x hx,
rw [pi.zero_apply, abs_zero],
exact (abs_nonneg _).trans hx },
by_contra h,
change μ _ ≠ 0 at h,
simp only [← zero_lt_iff, set.compl_def, set.mem_set_of_eq, not_le] at h,
suffices : (μ {x | ↑R < |μ[f | m] x|}).to_real * ↑R < (μ {x | ↑R < |μ[f | m] x|}).to_real * ↑R,
{ exact this.ne rfl },
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (set_integral_gt_gt R.coe_nonneg _ _ h.ne.symm) _,
{ simp_rw [← real.norm_eq_abs],
exact (strongly_measurable_condexp.mono hnm).measurable.norm },
{ exact integrable_condexp.abs.integrable_on },
refine (set_integral_abs_condexp_le _ _).trans _,
{ simp_rw [← real.norm_eq_abs],
exact @measurable_set_lt _ _ _ _ _ m _ _ _ _ _ measurable_const
strongly_measurable_condexp.norm.measurable },
simp only [← smul_eq_mul, ← set_integral_const, nnreal.val_eq_coe,
is_R_or_C.coe_real_eq_id, id.def],
refine set_integral_mono_ae hfint.abs.integrable_on _ _,
{ refine ⟨ae_strongly_measurable_const, lt_of_le_of_lt _
(integrable_condexp.integrable_on : integrable_on (μ[f | m]) {x | ↑R < |μ[f | m] x|} μ).2⟩,
refine set_lintegral_mono (measurable.nnnorm _).coe_nnreal_ennreal
(strongly_measurable_condexp.mono hnm).measurable.nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal (λ x hx, _),
{ exact measurable_const },
{ rw [ennreal.coe_le_coe, real.nnnorm_of_nonneg R.coe_nonneg],
exact subtype.mk_le_mk.2 (le_of_lt hx) } },
{ exact hbdd },
end
/-- Given a integrable function `g`, the conditional expectations of `g` with respect to
a sequence of sub-σ-algebras is uniformly integrable. -/
lemma integrable.uniform_integrable_condexp {ι : Type*} [is_finite_measure μ]
{g : α → ℝ} (hint : integrable g μ) {ℱ : ι → measurable_space α} (hℱ : ∀ i, ℱ i ≤ m0) :
uniform_integrable (λ i, μ[g | ℱ i]) 1 μ :=
begin
have hmeas : ∀ n, ∀ C, measurable_set {x | C ≤ ‖μ[g | ℱ n] x‖₊} :=
λ n C, measurable_set_le measurable_const
(strongly_measurable_condexp.mono (hℱ n)).measurable.nnnorm,
have hg : mem_ℒp g 1 μ := mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 hint,
refine uniform_integrable_of le_rfl ennreal.one_ne_top
(λ n, (strongly_measurable_condexp.mono (hℱ n)).ae_strongly_measurable) (λ ε hε, _),
by_cases hne : snorm g 1 μ = 0,
{ rw snorm_eq_zero_iff hg.1 one_ne_zero at hne,
refine ⟨0, λ n, (le_of_eq $ (snorm_eq_zero_iff
((strongly_measurable_condexp.mono (hℱ n)).ae_strongly_measurable.indicator (hmeas n 0))
one_ne_zero).2 _).trans (zero_le _)⟩,
filter_upwards [@condexp_congr_ae _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ n) m0 μ _ _ hne] with x hx,
simp only [zero_le', set.set_of_true, set.indicator_univ, pi.zero_apply, hx, condexp_zero] },
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, h⟩ := hg.snorm_indicator_le μ le_rfl ennreal.one_ne_top hε,
set C : ℝ≥0 := ⟨δ, hδ.le⟩⁻¹ * (snorm g 1 μ).to_nnreal with hC,
have hCpos : 0 < C :=
mul_pos (nnreal.inv_pos.2 hδ) (ennreal.to_nnreal_pos hne hg.snorm_lt_top.ne),
have : ∀ n, μ {x : α | C ≤ ‖μ[g | ℱ n] x‖₊} ≤ ennreal.of_real δ,
{ intro n,
have := mul_meas_ge_le_pow_snorm' μ one_ne_zero ennreal.one_ne_top
((@strongly_measurable_condexp _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ n) _ μ g).mono
(hℱ n)).ae_strongly_measurable C,
rw [ennreal.one_to_real, ennreal.rpow_one, ennreal.rpow_one, mul_comm,
← ennreal.le_div_iff_mul_le (or.inl (ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 hCpos.ne.symm))
(or.inl ennreal.coe_lt_top.ne)] at this,
simp_rw [ennreal.coe_le_coe] at this,
refine this.trans _,
rw [ennreal.div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl (ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 hCpos.ne.symm))
(or.inl ennreal.coe_lt_top.ne), hC, nonneg.inv_mk, ennreal.coe_mul,
ennreal.coe_to_nnreal hg.snorm_lt_top.ne, ← mul_assoc, ← ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal,
← ennreal.of_real_mul hδ.le, mul_inv_cancel hδ.ne.symm, ennreal.of_real_one, one_mul],
exact snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm _ },
refine ⟨C, λ n, le_trans _ (h {x : α | C ≤ ‖μ[g | ℱ n] x‖₊} (hmeas n C) (this n))⟩,
have hmeasℱ : measurable_set[ℱ n] {x : α | C ≤ ‖μ[g | ℱ n] x‖₊} :=
@measurable_set_le _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ n) _ _ _ _ _ measurable_const
(@measurable.nnnorm _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ n) _ strongly_measurable_condexp.measurable),
rw ← snorm_congr_ae (condexp_indicator hint hmeasℱ),
exact snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm _,
end
section pull_out
-- TODO: this section could be generalized beyond multiplication, to any bounded bilinear map.
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `condexp_measurable_mul`. -/
lemma condexp_strongly_measurable_simple_func_mul (hm : m ≤ m0)
(f : @simple_func α m ℝ) {g : α → ℝ} (hg : integrable g μ) :
μ[f * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] f * μ[g | m] :=
begin
have : ∀ s c (f : α → ℝ), set.indicator s (function.const α c) * f = s.indicator (c • f),
{ intros s c f,
ext1 x,
by_cases hx : x ∈ s,
{ simp only [hx, pi.mul_apply, set.indicator_of_mem, pi.smul_apply, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul] },
{ simp only [hx, pi.mul_apply, set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, zero_mul], }, },
refine @simple_func.induction _ _ m _ _ (λ c s hs, _) (λ g₁ g₂ h_disj h_eq₁ h_eq₂, _) f,
{ simp only [simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_piecewise, simple_func.coe_const,
simple_func.coe_zero, set.piecewise_eq_indicator],
rw [this, this],
refine (condexp_indicator (hg.smul c) hs).trans _,
filter_upwards [@condexp_smul α ℝ ℝ _ _ _ _ _ m m0 μ c g] with x hx,
classical,
simp_rw [set.indicator_apply, hx], },
{ have h_add := @simple_func.coe_add _ _ m _ g₁ g₂,
calc μ[⇑(g₁ + g₂) * g|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[(⇑g₁ + ⇑g₂) * g|m] :
by { refine condexp_congr_ae (eventually_eq.mul _ eventually_eq.rfl), rw h_add, }
... =ᵐ[μ] μ[⇑g₁ * g|m] + μ[⇑g₂ * g|m] :
by { rw add_mul, exact condexp_add (hg.simple_func_mul' hm _) (hg.simple_func_mul' hm _), }
... =ᵐ[μ] ⇑g₁ * μ[g|m] + ⇑g₂ * μ[g|m] : eventually_eq.add h_eq₁ h_eq₂
... =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(g₁ + g₂) * μ[g|m] : by rw [h_add, add_mul], },
end
lemma condexp_strongly_measurable_mul_of_bound (hm : m ≤ m0) [is_finite_measure μ]
{f g : α → ℝ} (hf : strongly_measurable[m] f) (hg : integrable g μ) (c : ℝ)
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
μ[f * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] f * μ[g | m] :=
begin
let fs := hf.approx_bounded c,
have hfs_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, fs n x) at_top (𝓝 (f x)),
from hf.tendsto_approx_bounded_ae hf_bound,
by_cases hμ : μ = 0,
{ simp only [hμ, ae_zero], },
haveI : μ.ae.ne_bot, by simp only [hμ, ae_ne_bot, ne.def, not_false_iff],
have hc : 0 ≤ c,
{ have h_exists : ∃ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c := eventually.exists hf_bound,
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans h_exists.some_spec, },
have hfs_bound : ∀ n x, ‖fs n x‖ ≤ c := hf.norm_approx_bounded_le hc,
have hn_eq : ∀ n, μ[fs n * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] fs n * μ[g | m],
from λ n, condexp_strongly_measurable_simple_func_mul hm _ hg,
have : μ[f * μ[g|m]|m] = f * μ[g|m],
{ refine condexp_of_strongly_measurable hm (hf.mul strongly_measurable_condexp) _,
exact integrable_condexp.bdd_mul' ((hf.mono hm).ae_strongly_measurable) hf_bound, },
rw ← this,
refine tendsto_condexp_unique (λ n x, fs n x * g x) (λ n x, fs n x * μ[g|m] x) (f * g)
(f * μ[g|m]) _ _ _ _ (λ x, c * ‖g x‖) _ (λ x, c * ‖μ[g|m] x‖) _ _ _ _,
{ exact λ n, hg.bdd_mul'
((simple_func.strongly_measurable (fs n)).mono hm).ae_strongly_measurable
(eventually_of_forall (hfs_bound n)), },
{ exact λ n, integrable_condexp.bdd_mul'
((simple_func.strongly_measurable (fs n)).mono hm).ae_strongly_measurable
(eventually_of_forall (hfs_bound n)), },
{ filter_upwards [hfs_tendsto] with x hx,
rw pi.mul_apply,
exact tendsto.mul hx tendsto_const_nhds, },
{ filter_upwards [hfs_tendsto] with x hx,
rw pi.mul_apply,
exact tendsto.mul hx tendsto_const_nhds, },
{ exact hg.norm.const_mul c, },
{ exact integrable_condexp.norm.const_mul c, },
{ refine λ n, eventually_of_forall (λ x, _),
exact (norm_mul_le _ _).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hfs_bound n x) (norm_nonneg _)), },
{ refine λ n, eventually_of_forall (λ x, _),
exact (norm_mul_le _ _).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hfs_bound n x) (norm_nonneg _)), },
{ intros n,
simp_rw ← pi.mul_apply,
refine (condexp_strongly_measurable_simple_func_mul hm _ hg).trans _,
rw condexp_of_strongly_measurable hm
((simple_func.strongly_measurable _).mul strongly_measurable_condexp) _,
{ apply_instance, },
{ apply_instance, },
exact integrable_condexp.bdd_mul'
((simple_func.strongly_measurable (fs n)).mono hm).ae_strongly_measurable
(eventually_of_forall (hfs_bound n)), },
end
lemma condexp_strongly_measurable_mul_of_bound₀ (hm : m ≤ m0) [is_finite_measure μ]
{f g : α → ℝ} (hf : ae_strongly_measurable' m f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) (c : ℝ)
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
μ[f * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] f * μ[g | m] :=
begin
have : μ[f * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[hf.mk f * g | m],
from condexp_congr_ae (eventually_eq.mul hf.ae_eq_mk eventually_eq.rfl),
refine this.trans _,
have : f * μ[g | m] =ᵐ[μ] hf.mk f * μ[g | m] := eventually_eq.mul hf.ae_eq_mk eventually_eq.rfl,
refine eventually_eq.trans _ this.symm,
refine condexp_strongly_measurable_mul_of_bound hm hf.strongly_measurable_mk hg c _,
filter_upwards [hf_bound, hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hxc hx_eq,
rw ← hx_eq,
exact hxc,
end
/-- Pull-out property of the conditional expectation. -/
lemma condexp_strongly_measurable_mul {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : strongly_measurable[m] f)
(hfg : integrable (f * g) μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
μ[f * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] f * μ[g | m] :=
begin
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0, swap, { simp_rw condexp_of_not_le hm, rw mul_zero, },
by_cases hμm : sigma_finite (μ.trim hm),
swap, { simp_rw condexp_of_not_sigma_finite hm hμm, rw mul_zero, },
haveI : sigma_finite (μ.trim hm) := hμm,
obtain ⟨sets, sets_prop, h_univ⟩ := hf.exists_spanning_measurable_set_norm_le hm μ,
simp_rw forall_and_distrib at sets_prop,
obtain ⟨h_meas, h_finite, h_norm⟩ := sets_prop,
suffices : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ sets n → μ[f * g|m] x = f x * μ[g|m] x,
{ rw ← ae_all_iff at this,
filter_upwards [this] with x hx,
rw pi.mul_apply,
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ sets i,
{ have h_mem : x ∈ ⋃ i, sets i,
{ rw h_univ, exact set.mem_univ _, },
simpa using h_mem, },
exact hx i hi, },
refine λ n, ae_imp_of_ae_restrict _,
suffices : (μ.restrict (sets n))[f * g | m]
=ᵐ[μ.restrict (sets n)] f * (μ.restrict (sets n))[g | m],
{ simp_rw ← pi.mul_apply,
refine (condexp_restrict_ae_eq_restrict hm (h_meas n) hfg).symm.trans _,
exact this.trans (eventually_eq.rfl.mul (condexp_restrict_ae_eq_restrict hm (h_meas n) hg)), },
suffices : (μ.restrict (sets n))[((sets n).indicator f) * g | m]
=ᵐ[μ.restrict (sets n)] ((sets n).indicator f) * (μ.restrict (sets n))[g | m],
{ refine eventually_eq.trans _ (this.trans _),
{ exact condexp_congr_ae
((indicator_ae_eq_restrict (hm _ (h_meas n))).symm.mul eventually_eq.rfl), },
{ exact (indicator_ae_eq_restrict (hm _ (h_meas n))).mul eventually_eq.rfl, }, },
haveI : is_finite_measure (μ.restrict (sets n)),
{ constructor,
rw measure.restrict_apply_univ,
exact h_finite n, },
refine condexp_strongly_measurable_mul_of_bound hm (hf.indicator (h_meas n)) hg.integrable_on n _,
refine eventually_of_forall (λ x, _),
by_cases hxs : x ∈ sets n,
{ simp only [hxs, set.indicator_of_mem],
exact h_norm n x hxs, },
{ simp only [hxs, set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, _root_.norm_zero, nat.cast_nonneg], },
end
/-- Pull-out property of the conditional expectation. -/
lemma condexp_strongly_measurable_mul₀ {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : ae_strongly_measurable' m f μ)
(hfg : integrable (f * g) μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
μ[f * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] f * μ[g | m] :=
begin
have : μ[f * g | m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[hf.mk f * g | m],
from condexp_congr_ae (eventually_eq.mul hf.ae_eq_mk eventually_eq.rfl),
refine this.trans _,
have : f * μ[g | m] =ᵐ[μ] hf.mk f * μ[g | m] := eventually_eq.mul hf.ae_eq_mk eventually_eq.rfl,
refine eventually_eq.trans _ this.symm,
refine condexp_strongly_measurable_mul hf.strongly_measurable_mk _ hg,
refine (integrable_congr _).mp hfg,
exact eventually_eq.mul hf.ae_eq_mk eventually_eq.rfl,
end
end pull_out
end measure_theory
|
bc21abc1b14179d319c0de7013d30d22ee6be70e | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/terminal.lean | 6785c251e9f3f916bb8c3f00c1fad132d88ff9e8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,211 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.pempty
import category_theory.limits.limits
/-!
# Initial and terminal objects in a category.
## References
* [Stacks: Initial and final objects](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002B)
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
/-- Construct a cone for the empty diagram given an object. -/
def as_empty_cone (X : C) : cone (functor.empty C) := { X := X, π := by tidy }
/-- Construct a cocone for the empty diagram given an object. -/
def as_empty_cocone (X : C) : cocone (functor.empty C) := { X := X, ι := by tidy }
/-- `X` is terminal if the cone it induces on the empty diagram is limiting. -/
abbreviation is_terminal (X : C) := is_limit (as_empty_cone X)
/-- `X` is initial if the cocone it induces on the empty diagram is colimiting. -/
abbreviation is_initial (X : C) := is_colimit (as_empty_cocone X)
/-- Give the morphism to a terminal object from any other. -/
def is_terminal.from {X : C} (t : is_terminal X) (Y : C) : Y ⟶ X :=
t.lift (as_empty_cone Y)
/-- Any two morphisms to a terminal object are equal. -/
lemma is_terminal.hom_ext {X Y : C} (t : is_terminal X) (f g : Y ⟶ X) : f = g :=
t.hom_ext (by tidy)
/-- Give the morphism from an initial object to any other. -/
def is_initial.to {X : C} (t : is_initial X) (Y : C) : X ⟶ Y :=
t.desc (as_empty_cocone Y)
/-- Any two morphisms from an initial object are equal. -/
lemma is_initial.hom_ext {X Y : C} (t : is_initial X) (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f = g :=
t.hom_ext (by tidy)
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is mono. -/
lemma is_terminal.mono_from {X Y : C} (t : is_terminal X) (f : X ⟶ Y) : mono f :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, t.hom_ext _ _⟩
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is epi. -/
lemma is_initial.epi_to {X Y : C} (t : is_initial X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : epi f :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, t.hom_ext _ _⟩
variable (C)
/--
A category has a terminal object if it has a limit over the empty diagram.
Use `has_terminal_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbreviation has_terminal := has_limits_of_shape (discrete pempty) C
/--
A category has an initial object if it has a colimit over the empty diagram.
Use `has_initial_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbreviation has_initial := has_colimits_of_shape (discrete pempty) C
/--
An arbitrary choice of terminal object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊤_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism from any object.
-/
abbreviation terminal [has_terminal C] : C := limit (functor.empty C)
/--
An arbitrary choice of initial object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊥_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism to any object.
-/
abbreviation initial [has_initial C] : C := colimit (functor.empty C)
notation `⊤_` C:20 := terminal C
notation `⊥_` C:20 := initial C
section
variables {C}
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has a terminal object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism to it from any other object. -/
lemma has_terminal_of_unique (X : C) [h : Π Y : C, unique (Y ⟶ X)] : has_terminal C :=
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit.mk
{ cone := { X := X, π := { app := pempty.rec _ } },
is_limit := { lift := λ s, (h s.X).default } } }
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has an initial object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism from it to any other object. -/
lemma has_initial_of_unique (X : C) [h : Π Y : C, unique (X ⟶ Y)] : has_initial C :=
{ has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit.mk
{ cocone := { X := X, ι := { app := pempty.rec _ } },
is_colimit := { desc := λ s, (h s.X).default } } }
/-- The map from an object to the terminal object. -/
abbreviation terminal.from [has_terminal C] (P : C) : P ⟶ ⊤_ C :=
limit.lift (functor.empty C) (as_empty_cone P)
/-- The map to an object from the initial object. -/
abbreviation initial.to [has_initial C] (P : C) : ⊥_ C ⟶ P :=
colimit.desc (functor.empty C) (as_empty_cocone P)
instance unique_to_terminal [has_terminal C] (P : C) : unique (P ⟶ ⊤_ C) :=
{ default := terminal.from P,
uniq := λ m, by { apply limit.hom_ext, rintro ⟨⟩ } }
instance unique_from_initial [has_initial C] (P : C) : unique (⊥_ C ⟶ P) :=
{ default := initial.to P,
uniq := λ m, by { apply colimit.hom_ext, rintro ⟨⟩ } }
/-- A terminal object is terminal. -/
def terminal_is_terminal [has_terminal C] : is_terminal (⊤_ C) :=
{ lift := λ s, terminal.from _ }
/-- An initial object is initial. -/
def initial_is_initial [has_initial C] : is_initial (⊥_ C) :=
{ desc := λ s, initial.to _ }
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is mono. -/
instance terminal.mono_from {Y : C} [has_terminal C] (f : ⊤_ C ⟶ Y) : mono f :=
is_terminal.mono_from terminal_is_terminal _
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is epi. -/
instance initial.epi_to {Y : C} [has_initial C] (f : Y ⟶ ⊥_ C) : epi f :=
is_initial.epi_to initial_is_initial _
end
end category_theory.limits
|
326121d4813537785931ab7266e9f054c72f136a | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Elab/Util.lean | 289a098ff25b751c1938328eea2a9cfcae2c7d9f | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,983 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Parser.Command
import Lean.KeyedDeclsAttribute
import Lean.Elab.Exception
namespace Lean
def Syntax.prettyPrint (stx : Syntax) : Format :=
match stx.unsetTrailing.reprint with -- TODO use syntax pretty printer
| some str => format str.toFormat
| none => format stx
def MacroScopesView.format (view : MacroScopesView) (mainModule : Name) : Format :=
Std.format <|
if view.scopes.isEmpty then
view.name
else if view.mainModule == mainModule then
view.scopes.foldl Name.mkNum (view.name ++ view.imported)
else
view.scopes.foldl Name.mkNum (view.name ++ view.imported ++ view.mainModule)
namespace Elab
def expandOptNamedPrio (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Nat :=
if stx.isNone then
return eval_prio default
else match stx[0] with
| `(Parser.Command.namedPrio| (priority := $prio)) => evalPrio prio
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
structure MacroStackElem where
before : Syntax
after : Syntax
abbrev MacroStack := List MacroStackElem
/-- If `ref` does not have position information, then try to use macroStack -/
def getBetterRef (ref : Syntax) (macroStack : MacroStack) : Syntax :=
match ref.getPos? with
| some _ => ref
| none =>
match macroStack.find? (·.before.getPos? != none) with
| some elem => elem.before
| none => ref
register_builtin_option pp.macroStack : Bool := {
defValue := false
group := "pp"
descr := "dispaly macro expansion stack"
}
def addMacroStack {m} [Monad m] [MonadOptions m] (msgData : MessageData) (macroStack : MacroStack) : m MessageData := do
if !pp.macroStack.get (← getOptions) then pure msgData else
match macroStack with
| [] => pure msgData
| stack@(top::_) =>
let msgData := msgData ++ Format.line ++ "with resulting expansion" ++ indentD top.after
pure $ stack.foldl
(fun (msgData : MessageData) (elem : MacroStackElem) =>
msgData ++ Format.line ++ "while expanding" ++ indentD elem.before)
msgData
def checkSyntaxNodeKind [Monad m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadError m] (k : Name) : m Name := do
if Parser.isValidSyntaxNodeKind (← getEnv) k then pure k
else throwError "failed"
def checkSyntaxNodeKindAtNamespaces [Monad m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadError m] (k : Name) : Name → m Name
| n@(.str p _) => checkSyntaxNodeKind (n ++ k) <|> checkSyntaxNodeKindAtNamespaces k p
| .anonymous => checkSyntaxNodeKind k
| _ => throwError "failed"
def checkSyntaxNodeKindAtCurrentNamespaces (k : Name) : AttrM Name := do
let ctx ← read
checkSyntaxNodeKindAtNamespaces k ctx.currNamespace
def syntaxNodeKindOfAttrParam (defaultParserNamespace : Name) (stx : Syntax) : AttrM SyntaxNodeKind := do
let k ← Attribute.Builtin.getId stx
checkSyntaxNodeKindAtCurrentNamespaces k
<|>
checkSyntaxNodeKind (defaultParserNamespace ++ k)
<|>
throwError "invalid syntax node kind '{k}'"
private unsafe def evalSyntaxConstantUnsafe (env : Environment) (opts : Options) (constName : Name) : ExceptT String Id Syntax :=
env.evalConstCheck Syntax opts `Lean.Syntax constName
@[implemented_by evalSyntaxConstantUnsafe]
opaque evalSyntaxConstant (env : Environment) (opts : Options) (constName : Name) : ExceptT String Id Syntax := throw ""
unsafe def mkElabAttribute (γ) (attrBuiltinName attrName : Name) (parserNamespace : Name) (typeName : Name) (kind : String)
(attrDeclName : Name := by exact decl_name%) : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute γ) :=
KeyedDeclsAttribute.init {
builtinName := attrBuiltinName
name := attrName
descr := kind ++ " elaborator"
valueTypeName := typeName
evalKey := fun _ stx => do
let kind ← syntaxNodeKindOfAttrParam parserNamespace stx
/- Recall that a `SyntaxNodeKind` is often the name of the parser, but this is not always true, and we must check it. -/
if (← getEnv).contains kind && (← getInfoState).enabled then
addConstInfo stx[1] kind none
return kind
onAdded := fun builtin declName => do
if builtin then
if let some doc ← findDocString? (← getEnv) declName (includeBuiltin := false) then
declareBuiltin (declName ++ `docString) (mkAppN (mkConst ``addBuiltinDocString) #[toExpr declName, toExpr doc])
if let some declRanges ← findDeclarationRanges? declName then
declareBuiltin (declName ++ `declRange) (mkAppN (mkConst ``addBuiltinDeclarationRanges) #[toExpr declName, toExpr declRanges])
} attrDeclName
unsafe def mkMacroAttributeUnsafe (ref : Name) : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute Macro) :=
mkElabAttribute Macro `builtin_macro `macro Name.anonymous `Lean.Macro "macro" ref
@[implemented_by mkMacroAttributeUnsafe]
opaque mkMacroAttribute (ref : Name) : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute Macro)
builtin_initialize macroAttribute : KeyedDeclsAttribute Macro ← mkMacroAttribute decl_name%
/--
Try to expand macro at syntax tree root and return macro declaration name and new syntax if successful.
Return none if all macros threw `Macro.Exception.unsupportedSyntax`.
-/
def expandMacroImpl? (env : Environment) : Syntax → MacroM (Option (Name × Except Macro.Exception Syntax)) := fun stx => do
for e in macroAttribute.getEntries env stx.getKind do
try
let stx' ← withFreshMacroScope (e.value stx)
return (e.declName, Except.ok stx')
catch
| Macro.Exception.unsupportedSyntax => pure ()
| ex => return (e.declName, Except.error ex)
return none
class MonadMacroAdapter (m : Type → Type) where
getCurrMacroScope : m MacroScope
getNextMacroScope : m MacroScope
setNextMacroScope : MacroScope → m Unit
@[always_inline]
instance (m n) [MonadLift m n] [MonadMacroAdapter m] : MonadMacroAdapter n := {
getCurrMacroScope := liftM (MonadMacroAdapter.getCurrMacroScope : m _)
getNextMacroScope := liftM (MonadMacroAdapter.getNextMacroScope : m _)
setNextMacroScope := fun s => liftM (MonadMacroAdapter.setNextMacroScope s : m _)
}
def liftMacroM [Monad m] [MonadMacroAdapter m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadRecDepth m] [MonadError m] [MonadResolveName m] [MonadTrace m] [MonadOptions m] [AddMessageContext m] [MonadLiftT IO m] (x : MacroM α) : m α := do
let env ← getEnv
let currNamespace ← getCurrNamespace
let openDecls ← getOpenDecls
let methods := Macro.mkMethods {
-- TODO: record recursive expansions in info tree?
expandMacro? := fun stx => do
match (← expandMacroImpl? env stx) with
| some (_, stx?) => liftExcept stx?
| none => return none
hasDecl := fun declName => return env.contains declName
getCurrNamespace := return currNamespace
resolveNamespace := fun n => return ResolveName.resolveNamespace env currNamespace openDecls n
resolveGlobalName := fun n => return ResolveName.resolveGlobalName env currNamespace openDecls n
}
match x { methods := methods
ref := ← getRef
currMacroScope := ← MonadMacroAdapter.getCurrMacroScope
mainModule := env.mainModule
currRecDepth := ← MonadRecDepth.getRecDepth
maxRecDepth := ← MonadRecDepth.getMaxRecDepth
} { macroScope := (← MonadMacroAdapter.getNextMacroScope) } with
| EStateM.Result.error Macro.Exception.unsupportedSyntax _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
| EStateM.Result.error (Macro.Exception.error ref msg) _ =>
if msg == maxRecDepthErrorMessage then
-- Make sure we can detect exception using `Exception.isMaxRecDepth`
throwMaxRecDepthAt ref
else
throwErrorAt ref msg
| EStateM.Result.ok a s =>
MonadMacroAdapter.setNextMacroScope s.macroScope
s.traceMsgs.reverse.forM fun (clsName, msg) => trace clsName fun _ => msg
return a
@[inline] def adaptMacro {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadMacroAdapter m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadRecDepth m] [MonadError m] [MonadResolveName m] [MonadTrace m] [MonadOptions m] [AddMessageContext m] [MonadLiftT IO m] (x : Macro) (stx : Syntax) : m Syntax :=
liftMacroM (x stx)
partial def mkUnusedBaseName (baseName : Name) : MacroM Name := do
let currNamespace ← Macro.getCurrNamespace
if ← Macro.hasDecl (currNamespace ++ baseName) then
let rec loop (idx : Nat) := do
let name := baseName.appendIndexAfter idx
if ← Macro.hasDecl (currNamespace ++ name) then
loop (idx+1)
else
return name
loop 1
else
return baseName
def logException [Monad m] [MonadLog m] [AddMessageContext m] [MonadOptions m] [MonadLiftT IO m] (ex : Exception) : m Unit := do
match ex with
| Exception.error ref msg => logErrorAt ref msg
| Exception.internal id _ =>
unless isAbortExceptionId id do
let name ← id.getName
logError m!"internal exception: {name}"
def withLogging [Monad m] [MonadLog m] [MonadExcept Exception m] [AddMessageContext m] [MonadOptions m] [MonadLiftT IO m]
(x : m Unit) : m Unit := do
try x catch ex => logException ex
def nestedExceptionToMessageData [Monad m] [MonadLog m] (ex : Exception) : m MessageData := do
let pos ← getRefPos
match ex.getRef.getPos? with
| none => return ex.toMessageData
| some exPos =>
if pos == exPos then
return ex.toMessageData
else
let exPosition := (← getFileMap).toPosition exPos
return m!"{exPosition.line}:{exPosition.column} {ex.toMessageData}"
def throwErrorWithNestedErrors [MonadError m] [Monad m] [MonadLog m] (msg : MessageData) (exs : Array Exception) : m α := do
throwError "{msg}, errors {toMessageList (← exs.mapM fun | ex => nestedExceptionToMessageData ex)}"
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Elab
registerTraceClass `Elab.step
registerTraceClass `Elab.step.result (inherited := true)
end Lean.Elab
|
3f2fc74981076784c197600295bd9480b6afe136 | f618aea02cb4104ad34ecf3b9713065cc0d06103 | /src/ring_theory/ideal_operations.lean | 40e72caa2ab847c6ce731acf62f1a8656aaa9f42 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | joehendrix/mathlib | 84b6603f6be88a7e4d62f5b1b0cbb523bb82b9a5 | c15eab34ad754f9ecd738525cb8b5a870e834ddc | refs/heads/master | 1,589,606,591,630 | 1,555,946,393,000 | 1,555,946,393,000 | 182,813,854 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,946,309,000 | 1,555,946,308,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,843 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
More operations on modules and ideals.
-/
import ring_theory.ideals data.nat.choose order.zorn
import linear_algebra.tensor_product
import data.equiv.algebra
import ring_theory.algebra_operations
local attribute [instance, priority 0] nat.cast_coe
universes u v w x
open lattice
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
instance has_scalar' : has_scalar (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ I N, ⨆ r : I, N.map (r.1 • linear_map.id)⟩
def annihilator (N : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
(linear_map.lsmul R N).ker
def colon (N P : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
annihilator (P.map N.mkq)
variables {I J : ideal R} {N N₁ N₂ P P₁ P₂ : submodule R M}
theorem mem_annihilator {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0:M) :=
⟨λ hr n hn, congr_arg subtype.val (linear_map.ext_iff.1 (linear_map.mem_ker.1 hr) ⟨n, hn⟩),
λ h, linear_map.mem_ker.2 $ linear_map.ext $ λ n, subtype.eq $ h n.1 n.2⟩
theorem mem_annihilator' {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ N ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) ⊥ :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).2 $ H n hn, λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).1 $ H hn⟩
theorem annihilator_bot : (⊥ : submodule R M).annihilator = ⊤ :=
(ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ mem_annihilator'.2 bot_le
theorem annihilator_eq_top_iff : N.annihilator = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊥ :=
⟨λ H, eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ (n:M) hn, (mem_bot R).2 $ one_smul R n ▸ mem_annihilator.1 ((ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).1 H) n hn,
λ H, H.symm ▸ annihilator_bot⟩
theorem annihilator_mono (h : N ≤ P) : P.annihilator ≤ N.annihilator :=
λ r hrp, mem_annihilator.2 $ λ n hn, mem_annihilator.1 hrp n $ h hn
theorem annihilator_supr (ι : Type w) (f : ι → submodule R M) :
(annihilator ⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, annihilator (f i) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, annihilator_mono $ le_supr _ _)
(λ r H, mem_annihilator'.2 $ supr_le $ λ i,
have _ := (mem_infi _).1 H i, mem_annihilator'.1 this)
theorem mem_colon {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ ∀ p ∈ P, r • p ∈ N :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H p hp, (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).1 (H (quotient.mk p) (mem_map_of_mem hp)),
λ H m ⟨p, hp, hpm⟩, hpm ▸ (N.mkq).map_smul r p ▸ (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).2 $ H p hp⟩
theorem mem_colon' {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ P ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) N :=
mem_colon
theorem colon_mono (hn : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hp : P₁ ≤ P₂) : N₁.colon P₂ ≤ N₂.colon P₁ :=
λ r hrnp, mem_colon.2 $ λ p₁ hp₁, hn $ mem_colon.1 hrnp p₁ $ hp hp₁
theorem infi_colon_supr (ι₁ : Type w) (f : ι₁ → submodule R M)
(ι₂ : Type x) (g : ι₂ → submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, f i).colon (⨆ j, g j) = ⨅ i j, (f i).colon (g j) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ λ j, colon_mono (infi_le _ _) (le_supr _ _))
(λ r H, mem_colon'.2 $ supr_le $ λ j, map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ le_infi $ λ i,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mem_colon'.1 $ have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 H i),
have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 this j), this)
theorem smul_mem_smul {r} {n} (hr : r ∈ I) (hn : n ∈ N) : r • n ∈ I • N :=
(le_supr _ ⟨r, hr⟩ : _ ≤ I • N) ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
theorem smul_le {P : submodule R M} : I • N ≤ P ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), r • n ∈ P :=
⟨λ H r hr n hn, H $ smul_mem_smul hr hn,
λ H, supr_le $ λ r, map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ n hn, H r.1 r.2 n hn⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem smul_induction_on {p : M → Prop} {x} (H : x ∈ I • N)
(Hb : ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), p (r • n)) (H0 : p 0)
(H1 : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(H2 : ∀ (c:R) n, p n → p (c • n)) : p x :=
(@smul_le _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨p, H0, H1, H2⟩).2 Hb H
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨λ hx, smul_induction_on hx
(λ r hri n hnm, let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm in ⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
⟨0, I.zero_mem, by rw [zero_smul]⟩
(λ m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩, ⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩)
(λ c r ⟨y, hyi, hy⟩, ⟨c * y, I.mul_mem_left hyi, by rw [mul_smul, hy]⟩),
λ ⟨y, hyi, hy⟩, hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span $ set.mem_singleton m)⟩
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n, N.smul_mem r
theorem smul_mono (hij : I ≤ J) (hnp : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ J • P :=
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, smul_mem_smul (hij hr) (hnp hn)
theorem smul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I • N ≤ J • N :=
smul_mono h (le_refl N)
theorem smul_mono_right (h : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ I • P :=
smul_mono (le_refl I) h
variables (I J N P)
@[simp] theorem smul_bot : I • (⊥ : submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsb,
(submodule.mem_bot R).2 $ ((submodule.mem_bot R).1 hsb).symm ▸ smul_zero r
@[simp] theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : ideal R) • N = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hrb s hsi,
(submodule.mem_bot R).2 $ ((submodule.mem_bot R).1 hrb).symm ▸ zero_smul _ s
@[simp] theorem top_smul : (⊤ : ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right $ λ r hri, one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
theorem smul_sup : I • (N ⊔ P) = I • N ⊔ I • P :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hri m hmnp, let ⟨n, hn, p, hp, hnpm⟩ := mem_sup.1 hmnp in
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, smul_mem_smul hri hn, _, smul_mem_smul hri hp, hnpm ▸ (smul_add _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (smul_mono_right le_sup_left)
(smul_mono_right le_sup_right))
theorem sup_smul : (I ⊔ J) • N = I • N ⊔ J • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hrij n hn, let ⟨ri, hri, rj, hrj, hrijr⟩ := mem_sup.1 hrij in
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, smul_mem_smul hri hn, _, smul_mem_smul hrj hn, hrijr ▸ (add_smul _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (smul_mono_left le_sup_left)
(smul_mono_left le_sup_right))
theorem smul_assoc : (I • J) • N = I • (J • N) :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ rs hrsij t htn,
smul_induction_on hrsij
(λ r hr s hs, (@smul_eq_mul R _ r s).symm ▸ smul_smul _ r s t ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (smul_mem_smul hs htn))
((zero_smul R t).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ x y, (add_smul x y t).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ r s h, (@smul_eq_mul R _ r s).symm ▸ smul_smul _ r s t ▸ submodule.smul_mem _ _ h))
(smul_le.2 $ λ r hr sn hsn, suffices J • N ≤ submodule.comap (r • linear_map.id) ((I • J) • N), from this hsn,
smul_le.2 $ λ s hs n hn, show r • (s • n) ∈ (I • J) • N, from mul_smul r s n ▸ smul_mem_smul (smul_mem_smul hr hs) hn)
variables (S : set R) (T : set M)
theorem span_smul_span : (ideal.span S) • (span R T) =
span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hrS n hnT, span_induction hrS
(λ r hrS, span_induction hnT
(λ n hnT, subset_span $ set.mem_bUnion hrS $
set.mem_bUnion hnT $ set.mem_singleton _)
((smul_zero r : r • 0 = (0:M)).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ x y, (smul_add r x y).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ c m, by rw [smul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul]; exact submodule.smul_mem _ _))
((zero_smul R n).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ r s, (add_smul r s n).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ c r, by rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_smul]; exact submodule.smul_mem _ _)) $
span_le.2 $ set.bUnion_subset $ λ r hrS, set.bUnion_subset $ λ n hnT, set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $
smul_mem_smul (subset_span hrS) (subset_span hnT)
end submodule
namespace ideal
section chinese_remainder
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {ι : Type v}
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_mem (s : finset ι) {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) (i : ι) (his : i ∈ s) :
∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ f i ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → r ∈ f j :=
begin
have : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → ∃ r : R, ∃ H : r - 1 ∈ f i, r ∈ f j,
{ intros j hjs hji, specialize hf i his j hjs hji.symm,
rw [eq_top_iff_one, submodule.mem_sup] at hf,
rcases hf with ⟨r, hri, s, hsj, hrs⟩, refine ⟨1 - r, _, _⟩,
{ rw [sub_right_comm, sub_self, zero_sub], exact (f i).neg_mem hri },
{ rw [← hrs, add_sub_cancel'], exact hsj } },
classical,
have : ∃ g : ι → R, (∀ j, g j - 1 ∈ f i) ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → g j ∈ f j,
{ choose g hg1 hg2,
refine ⟨λ j, if H : j ∈ s ∧ j ≠ i then g j H.1 H.2 else 1, λ j, _, λ j, _⟩,
{ split_ifs with h, { apply hg1 }, rw sub_self, exact (f i).zero_mem },
{ intros hjs hji, rw dif_pos, { apply hg2 }, exact ⟨hjs, hji⟩ } },
rcases this with ⟨g, hgi, hgj⟩, use (s.erase i).prod g, split,
{ rw [← quotient.eq, quotient.mk_one, ← finset.prod_hom (quotient.mk (f i))],
apply finset.prod_eq_one, intros, rw [← quotient.mk_one, quotient.eq], apply hgi },
intros j hjs hji, rw [← quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ← finset.prod_hom (quotient.mk (f j))],
refine finset.prod_eq_zero (finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hji hjs) _,
rw quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, exact hgj j hjs hji
end
theorem exists_sub_mem [fintype ι] {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) (g : ι → R) :
∃ r : R, ∀ i, r - g i ∈ f i :=
begin
have : ∃ φ : ι → R, (∀ i, φ i - 1 ∈ f i) ∧ (∀ i j, i ≠ j → φ i ∈ f j),
{ have := exists_sub_one_mem_and_mem (finset.univ : finset ι) (λ i _ j _ hij, hf i j hij),
choose φ hφ, use λ i, φ i (finset.mem_univ i),
exact ⟨λ i, (hφ i _).1, λ i j hij, (hφ i _).2 j (finset.mem_univ j) hij.symm⟩ },
rcases this with ⟨φ, hφ1, hφ2⟩,
use finset.univ.sum (λ i, g i * φ i),
intros i,
rw [← quotient.eq, ← finset.sum_hom (quotient.mk (f i))],
refine eq.trans (finset.sum_eq_single i _ _) _,
{ intros j _ hji, rw quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, exact (f i).mul_mem_left (hφ2 j i hji) },
{ intros hi, exact (hi $ finset.mem_univ i).elim },
specialize hφ1 i, rw [← quotient.eq, quotient.mk_one] at hφ1,
rw [quotient.mk_mul, hφ1, mul_one]
end
def quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient (f : ι → ideal R) :
(⨅ i, f i).quotient → Π i, (f i).quotient :=
@@quotient.lift _ _ (⨅ i, f i) (λ r i, ideal.quotient.mk (f i) r)
(@pi.is_ring_hom_pi ι (λ i, (f i).quotient) _ R _ _ _)
(λ r hr, funext $ λ i, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 $ (submodule.mem_infi _).1 hr i)
theorem is_ring_hom_quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient (f : ι → ideal R) :
is_ring_hom (quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f) :=
@@quotient.is_ring_hom _ _ _
(@pi.is_ring_hom_pi ι (λ i, (f i).quotient) _ R _ _ _) _
theorem bijective_quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient [fintype ι] {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) :
function.bijective (quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f) :=
⟨λ x y, quotient.induction_on₂' x y $ λ r s hrs, quotient.eq.2 $
(submodule.mem_infi _).2 $ λ i, quotient.eq.1 $
show quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f (quotient.mk' r) i = _, by rw hrs; refl,
λ g, let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_sub_mem hf (λ i, quotient.out' (g i)) in
⟨quotient.mk _ r, funext $ λ i, quotient.out_eq' (g i) ▸ quotient.eq.2 (hr i)⟩⟩
/-- Chinese Remainder Theorem. Eisenbud Ex.2.6. Similar to Atiyah-Macdonald 1.10 and Stacks 00DT -/
noncomputable def quotient_inf_ring_equiv_pi_quotient [fintype ι] (f : ι → ideal R)
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) :
(⨅ i, f i).quotient ≃r Π i, (f i).quotient :=
{ hom := is_ring_hom_quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f,
.. equiv.of_bijective (bijective_quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient hf) }
end chinese_remainder
section mul_and_radical
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
variables {I J K L: ideal R}
instance : has_mul (ideal R) := ⟨(•)⟩
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (s ∈ J), r * s ∈ K :=
submodule.smul_le
variables (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 $ λ r hrI s hsJ, mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 $ λ r hrJ s hsI, mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
protected theorem mul_assoc : (I * J) * K = I * (J * K) :=
submodule.smul_assoc I J K
theorem span_mul_span (S T : set R) : span S * span T =
span ⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t} :=
submodule.span_smul_span S T
variables {I J K}
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj, ⟨I.mul_mem_right hri, J.mul_mem_left hsj⟩
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf $ λ r ⟨hri, hrj⟩,
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h) in
mul_one r ▸ hst ▸ (mul_add r s t).symm ▸ ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj) (mul_mem_mul hri htj)
variables (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
submodule.smul_bot I
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ :=
submodule.bot_smul I
theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ submodule.top_smul I
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
submodule.top_smul I
variables {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_right h
variables (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
submodule.sup_smul I J K
variables {I J K}
def radical (I : ideal R) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := { r | ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I },
zero := ⟨1, (pow_one (0:R)).symm ▸ I.zero_mem⟩,
add := λ x y ⟨m, hxmi⟩ ⟨n, hyni⟩, ⟨m + n,
(add_pow x y (m + n)).symm ▸ I.sum_mem $
show ∀ c ∈ finset.range (nat.succ (m + n)), x ^ c * y ^ (m + n - c) * (nat.choose (m + n) c) ∈ I,
from λ c hc, or.cases_on (le_total c m)
(λ hcm, I.mul_mem_right $ I.mul_mem_left $ nat.add_comm n m ▸ (nat.add_sub_assoc hcm n).symm ▸
(pow_add y n (m-c)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right hyni)
(λ hmc, I.mul_mem_right $ I.mul_mem_right $ nat.add_sub_cancel' hmc ▸
(pow_add x m (c-m)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right hxmi)⟩,
smul := λ r s ⟨n, hsni⟩, ⟨n, show (r * s)^n ∈ I,
from (mul_pow r s n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_left hsni⟩ }
theorem le_radical : I ≤ radical I :=
λ r hri, ⟨1, (pow_one r).symm ▸ hri⟩
variables (R)
theorem radical_top : (radical ⊤ : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 ⟨0, submodule.mem_top⟩
variables {R}
theorem radical_mono (H : I ≤ J) : radical I ≤ radical J :=
λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, H hrni⟩
variables (I)
theorem radical_idem : radical (radical I) = radical I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, k, hrnki⟩, ⟨n * k, (pow_mul r n k).symm ▸ hrnki⟩) le_radical
variables {I}
theorem radical_eq_top : radical I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨λ h, (eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (eq_top_iff_one _).1 h in
@one_pow R _ n ▸ hn, λ h, h.symm ▸ radical_top R⟩
theorem is_prime.radical (H : is_prime I) : radical I = I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, H.mem_of_pow_mem n hrni) le_radical
variables (I J)
theorem radical_sup : radical (I ⊔ J) = radical (radical I ⊔ radical J) :=
le_antisymm (radical_mono $ sup_le_sup le_radical le_radical) $
λ r ⟨n, hrnij⟩, let ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrnij in
@radical_idem _ _ (I ⊔ J) ▸ ⟨n, hst ▸ ideal.add_mem _
(radical_mono le_sup_left hs) (radical_mono le_sup_right ht)⟩
theorem radical_inf : radical (I ⊓ J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (radical_mono inf_le_left) (radical_mono inf_le_right))
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right hrm,
(pow_add r m n).symm ▸ J.mul_mem_left hrn⟩)
theorem radical_mul : radical (I * J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (radical_inf I J ▸ radical_mono $ @mul_le_inf _ _ I J)
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ mul_mem_mul hrm hrn⟩)
variables {I J}
theorem is_prime.radical_le_iff (hj : is_prime J) :
radical I ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨le_trans le_radical, λ hij r ⟨n, hrni⟩, hj.mem_of_pow_mem n $ hij hrni⟩
theorem radical_eq_Inf (I : ideal R) :
radical I = Inf { J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J } :=
le_antisymm (le_Inf $ λ J hJ, hJ.2.radical_le_iff.2 hJ.1) $
λ r hr, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hri,
let ⟨m, (hrm : r ∉ radical m), him, hm⟩ := zorn.zorn_partial_order₀ {K : ideal R | r ∉ radical K}
(λ c hc hcc y hyc, ⟨Sup c, λ ⟨n, hrnc⟩, let ⟨y, hyc, hrny⟩ :=
submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed hrnc y hyc hcc.directed_on in hc hyc ⟨n, hrny⟩,
λ z, le_Sup⟩) I hri in
have ∀ x ∉ m, r ∈ radical (m ⊔ span {x}) := λ x hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hrmx, hxm $
hm (m ⊔ span {x}) hrmx le_sup_left ▸ (le_sup_right : _ ≤ m ⊔ span {x}) (subset_span $ set.mem_singleton _),
have is_prime m, from ⟨by rintro rfl; rw radical_top at hrm; exact hrm trivial,
λ x y hxym, classical.or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hym,
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := this _ hxm, ⟨p, hpm, q, hq, hpqrn⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrn, ⟨c, hcxq⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq in
let ⟨k, hrk⟩ := this _ hym, ⟨f, hfm, g, hg, hfgrk⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrk, ⟨d, hdyg⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hg in
hrm ⟨n + k, by rw [pow_add, ← hpqrn, ← hcxq, ← hfgrk, ← hdyg, add_mul, mul_add (c*x), mul_assoc c x (d*y), mul_left_comm x, ← mul_assoc];
refine m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_right hpm) (m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_left hfm) (m.mul_mem_left hxym))⟩⟩,
hrm $ this.radical.symm ▸ (Inf_le ⟨him, this⟩ : Inf {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J} ≤ m) hr
instance : comm_semiring (ideal R) := submodule.comm_semiring
@[simp] lemma add_eq_sup : I + J = I ⊔ J := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_bot : (0 : ideal R) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_eq_top : (1 : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
by erw [submodule.one_eq_map_top, submodule.map_id]
variables (I)
theorem radical_pow (n : ℕ) (H : n > 0) : radical (I^n) = radical I :=
nat.rec_on n (not.elim dec_trivial) (λ n ih H,
or.cases_on (lt_or_eq_of_le $ nat.le_of_lt_succ H)
(λ H, calc radical (I^(n+1))
= radical I ⊓ radical (I^n) : radical_mul _ _
... = radical I ⊓ radical I : by rw ih H
... = radical I : inf_idem)
(λ H, H ▸ (pow_one I).symm ▸ rfl)) H
end mul_and_radical
section map_and_comap
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
variables (f : R → S) [is_ring_hom f]
variables {I J : ideal R} {K L : ideal S}
def map (I : ideal R) : ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
def comap (I : ideal S) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := f ⁻¹' I,
zero := show f 0 ∈ I, by rw is_ring_hom.map_zero f; exact I.zero_mem,
add := λ x y hx hy, show f (x + y) ∈ I, by rw is_ring_hom.map_add f; exact I.add_mem hx hy,
smul := λ c x hx, show f (c * x) ∈ I, by rw is_ring_hom.map_mul f; exact I.mul_mem_left hx }
variables {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono $ set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap :
map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans set.image_subset_iff
@[simp] theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K := iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
set.preimage_mono h
variables (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 $ by rw [mem_comap, is_ring_hom.map_one f];
exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
instance is_prime.comap {hK : K.is_prime} : (comap f K).is_prime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, λ x y,
by simp only [mem_comap, is_ring_hom.map_mul f]; apply hK.2⟩
variables (I J K L)
theorem map_bot : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 bot_le) bot_le
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ subset_span ⟨1, trivial, is_ring_hom.map_one f⟩
theorem comap_top : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 trivial
theorem map_sup : map f (I ⊔ J) = map f I ⊔ map f J :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ sup_le
(map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_sup_left)
(map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_sup_right))
(sup_le (map_mono le_sup_left) (map_mono le_sup_right))
theorem map_mul : map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj,
show f (r * s) ∈ _, by rw is_ring_hom.map_mul f;
exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem hri) (mem_map_of_mem hsj))
(trans_rel_right _ (span_mul_span _ _) $ span_le.2 $
set.bUnion_subset $ λ i ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩,
set.bUnion_subset $ λ j ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩,
set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ hfri ▸ hfsj ▸
by rw [← is_ring_hom.map_mul f];
exact mem_map_of_mem (mul_mem_mul hri hsj))
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L := rfl
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, show f (r ^ n) ∈ K,
from (is_semiring_hom.map_pow f r n).symm ▸ hfrnk⟩)
(λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, is_semiring_hom.map_pow f r n ▸ hfrnk⟩)
variables {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ (comap_inf f (map f I) (map f J)).symm ▸
inf_le_inf (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ le_refl _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ le_refl _)
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, is_semiring_hom.map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ (map_sup f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
sup_le_sup (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _)
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ (map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _)
section surjective
variables (hf : function.surjective f)
include hf
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : ideal S) :
map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (le_refl _))
(λ s hsi, let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s in
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem $ show f r ∈ I, from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi))
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : ideal R} {y}
(H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
submodule.span_induction H (λ _, id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, is_ring_hom.map_zero f⟩
(λ y1 y2 ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩, ⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ is_ring_hom.map_add f⟩)
(λ c y ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩, let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c in ⟨d • x, I.smul_mem _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ is_ring_hom.map_mul f⟩)
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (I : ideal R) :
comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (assume r h, let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h in
submodule.mem_sup.2 ⟨s, hsi, r - s, (submodule.mem_bot S).2 $ by rw [is_ring_hom.map_sub f, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel'_right s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 (le_refl _)) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def order_iso_of_surjective :
((≤) : ideal S → ideal S → Prop) ≃o
((≤) : { p : ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } → { p : ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } → Prop) :=
{ to_fun := λ J, ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩,
inv_fun := λ I, map f I.1,
left_inv := λ J, map_comap_of_surjective f hf J,
right_inv := λ I, subtype.eq $ show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1,
from (comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm
(sup_le (le_refl _) I.2) le_sup_left,
ord := λ I1 I2, ⟨comap_mono, λ H, map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸
map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H⟩ }
def le_order_embedding_of_surjective :
((≤) : ideal S → ideal S → Prop) ≼o ((≤) : ideal R → ideal R → Prop) :=
(order_iso_of_surjective f hf).to_order_embedding.trans (subtype.order_embedding _ _)
def lt_order_embedding_of_surjective :
((<) : ideal S → ideal S → Prop) ≼o ((<) : ideal R → ideal R → Prop) :=
(le_order_embedding_of_surjective f hf).lt_embedding_of_le_embedding
end surjective
end map_and_comap
end ideal
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
-- It is even a semialgebra. But those aren't in mathlib yet.
instance : semimodule (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
{ smul_add := smul_sup,
add_smul := sup_smul,
mul_smul := smul_assoc,
one_smul := by simp,
zero_smul := bot_smul,
smul_zero := smul_bot }
end submodule
|
e827123db5b7d1fe403545716b611f0a14182d1c | ce6917c5bacabee346655160b74a307b4a5ab620 | /src/ch2/ex0703.lean | f64dc8c84991faa79a9cd00b870776cb5b4b7902 | [] | no_license | Ailrun/Theorem_Proving_in_Lean | ae6a23f3c54d62d401314d6a771e8ff8b4132db2 | 2eb1b5caf93c6a5a555c79e9097cf2ba5a66cf68 | refs/heads/master | 1,609,838,270,467 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 240,967,761 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 49 | lean | open list
#check nil
#check cons
#check append
|
be950c3a659f7bce54fd2d8b9732d9f32d452e58 | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/sets_functions_and_relations/unnamed_330.lean | 70864bffe96830db0363c1c2106f599d6058abed | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 137 | lean | import tactic
variable {α : Type*}
variables (s t u : set α)
-- BEGIN
example : s ∩ t = t ∩ s :=
by ext x; simp [and.comm]
-- END |
02e9dd4d3ad9c5201760ad7ffe0147a6e8800dbf | 76ce87faa6bc3c2aa9af5962009e01e04f2a074a | /HW/HW3-key.lean | a99300042785ba9d208c78c5f2cc3f51723f84a6 | [] | no_license | Mnormansell/Discrete-Notes | db423dd9206bbe7080aecb84b4c2d275b758af97 | 61f13b98be590269fc4822be7b47924a6ddc1261 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,412,435,424 | 1,540,919,483,000 | 1,540,919,483,000 | 148,684,638 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,635 | lean | /-
Produce a proof, pf1, of the proposition
that 0 = 0 ∧ (1 = 1 ∧ 2 = 2).
-/
lemma pf1 : 0 = 0 ∧ (1 = 1 ∧ 2 = 2) :=
and.intro rfl (and.intro rfl rfl)
/-
Produce a proof, pf2, of the proposition
that (0 = 0 ∧ 1 = 1) ∧ 2 = 2
-/
lemma pf2 : (0 = 0 ∧ 1 = 1) ∧ 2 = 2 :=
and.intro (and.intro rfl rfl) rfl
/-
Produce a proof, pf3, of the proposition
that 0 = 0 ∧ 1 = 1 ∧ 2 = 2. Hint, one of
the two preceding proofs can be used to
prove this proposition; there's no need
to type out a whole new proof.
-/
lemma pf3 : 0 = 0 ∧ 1 = 1 ∧ 2 = 2 :=
pf1
/-
An operator, *, is "right associative"
if X * Y * Z means X * (Y * Z), and is
"left associative" if X * Y * Z means
(X * Y) * Y. Is the logical connective,
∧, left or right associative? Explain.
-/
-- It's right associative as we just proved
-- pf3 with pf1, and pf1 is in the form
-- X * (Y * Z).
/-
Use Lean to produce a proof, pf4, that
0 = 0 ∧ 1 = 1 ∧ 2 = 2 is exactly the
same proposition as one of the two
parenthesized forms. It will be a
proof that two propositions are equal.
Put parentheses around each of the
propositions.
-/
lemma pf4 :
(0 = 0 ∧ 1 = 1 ∧ 2 = 2) =
(0 = 0 ∧ (1 = 1 ∧ 2 = 2)) :=
rfl
/-
Given arbitrary propositions, P, Q and
R it should be possible to produce a
proof, pf5, showing that if P ∧ (Q ∧ R)
is true then so is (P ∧ Q) ∧ R. Written
in inference rule form, this would say
the following:
{ P Q R: Prop }, pqr_left : P ∧ (Q ∧ R)
---------------------------------- ∧.assoc'
pqr_right : (P ∧ Q) ∧ R
Proving that this is a valid rule
can be done by defining a function,
let's call it and_assoc_l, that when
given any propositions, P, Q, and R
(implicitly), and when given a proof
of P ∧ (Q ∧ R), constructs and returns
a proof of (P ∧ Q) ∧ R.
Here we give you this function, and
we explain each part in comments.
You will then apply what you learn
by studying this example to solve
the same problem but going in the
other direction. Here's the solution.
-/
-- define the function name
def and_assoc_l
-- specify the arguments and their types
{P Q R: Prop}
(pf: P ∧ (Q ∧ R)) : -- note colon
-- the return type
(P ∧ Q) ∧ R
/-
What we've given so far is what we call
the function signature: its name, the
names and types of the arguments that it
takes, and the type of the return value.
In this case, the return value is of
type (P ∧ Q) ∧ R, and will thus serve
as a proof of this proposition. This is
a function that takes a proof and returns
a (different) proof. It thus provides a
general recipe for turning any proof of
P ∧ (Q ∧ R) into a proof of (P ∧ Q) ∧ R.
-/
:= -- now give function body
/-
Usually we'd expect to see an expression
here, involving multiple, nested and.elim
and and.intro expressions. We could write
the function body that way, but it's a bit
tricky to get all the nested expressions
right. Here's a revelation: We can use a
tactic script to produce the same result.
Open your Messages window, put your cursor
on begin, study carefully the tactic state,
notice that the arguments are given in the
context to the left of the turnstile and
the goal remaining to be proved is to the
right. You can use the context values as
arguments to tactics.
Now click through each line of the script
and study very carefully how it changes the
context. By the end of the script, you
should see how we've been able to use
elimination rules take apart the proof
that was given as an argument, giving names
to the parts, and how we can then further
take apart those parts, giving names to the
subparts, and finally how we can intro
rules to put all these pieces together
again into the proof we need.
-/
begin
have pfP := and.elim_left pf,
have pfQR := and.elim_right pf,
have pfQ := and.elim_left pfQR,
have pfR := and.elim_right pfQR,
have pfPQ := and.intro pfP pfQ,
have pfPQ_R := and.intro pfPQ pfR,
exact pfPQ_R
end
/-
Define another function, and_assoc_r,
that goes the other direction: given
a proof of (P ∧ Q) ∧ R it derives and
returns a proof of P ∧ (Q ∧ R). Write
the entire solution yourself.
-/
def and_assoc_r
{P Q R: Prop}
(pf: (P ∧ Q) ∧ R) :
P ∧ (Q ∧ R) :=
begin
have pfPQ := and.elim_left pf,
have pfR := and.elim_right pf,
have pfP := and.elim_left pfPQ,
have pfQ := and.elim_right pfPQ,
have pfQR := and.intro pfQ pfR,
have pfP_QR := and.intro pfP pfQR,
exact pfP_QR
end
/-
It's important to learn how you would
give such proofs in natural langage.
Let's take our first example. Here is
a natural language version.
"Given arbitrary propositions, P, Q, and
R, and the assumption that P ∧ (Q ∧ R) is
true, we are to show that (P ∧ Q) ∧ R is
true.
Given that P ∧ (Q ∧ R) is true, it must
be that P is true and that Q ∧ R is also
true. Given that Q ∧ R is true, it must
be that Q is true, and R is also true.
So we have that P, Q, and R are all true.
From these conclusions we can in turn
deduce that P ∧ Q must be true. And so
we now have that P ∧ Q is true and so is
R, from which, finally we can deduce
that (P ∧ Q) ∧ R must be true as well.
QED."
Now it's your turn: write an English
language proof for the theorem in the
other direction.
-/
/-
"Given arbitrary propositions, P, Q, and
R, and the assumption that (P ∧ Q) ∧ R is
true, we are to show that P ∧ (Q ∧ R) is
true.
Given that (P ∧ Q) ∧ R, it must be that
(P ∧ Q) is true and also that R is true.
Given that (P ∧ Q) is true, then P must
be true, and Q must be true. Therefore
P, Q, and R are all true.
From this conclusion we can deduce that
Q ∧ R must be true. Since P is true and
(Q ∧ R) is true, it follows that P ∧ (Q ∧ R)
must be true as well.
QED."
-/
/-
Use Lean to produce a proof, tnott, of
the proposition that truth isn't truth.
I.e., true is not true. We'll write this
is Lean like this:
theorem tnott: true ≠ true := _.
To make it a little easier to solve
this otherwise difficult problem, we
allow you to stipulate one "axiom" of
your choice, which you can then use
to produce the required proof.
-/
-- You can introduce an axiom here
axiom f: false
-- Now prove the theorem
theorem tnott : true ≠ true := false.elim f
/-
What did you have to accept to be able
to prove that truth isn't truth?
-/
/- We had to accept that there was an axiom
for false, which is an absurdity, which
then allows us to create a proof for a
proposition for which there is not proof
-/ |
e8c5391168a49c3b5809b2406c304fb393702d6f | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/tactic/transfer.lean | a4302fd6b9c76ff87d10fbb5665d0d5750a95805 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,495 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl (CMU)
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic
import init.meta.match_tactic
import init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance
import init.data.list.instances
import logic.relator
open tactic expr list monad
namespace transfer
/- Transfer rules are of the shape:
rel_t : {u} Πx, R t₁ t₂
where `u` is a list of universe parameters, `x` is a list of dependent variables, and `R` is a
relation. Then this rule will translate `t₁` (depending on `u` and `x`) into `t₂`. `u` and `x`
will be called parameters. When `R` is a relation on functions lifted from `S` and `R` the variables
bound by `S` are called arguments. `R` is generally constructed using `⇒` (i.e. `relator.lift_fun`).
As example:
rel_eq : (R ⇒ R ⇒ iff) eq t
transfer will match this rule when it sees:
(@eq α a b) and transfer it to (t a b)
Here `α` is a parameter and `a` and `b` are arguments.
TODO: add trace statements
TODO: currently the used relation must be fixed by the matched rule or through type class
inference. Maybe we want to replace this by type inference similar to Isabelle's transfer.
-/
private meta structure rel_data :=
(in_type : expr)
(out_type : expr)
(relation : expr)
meta instance has_to_tactic_format_rel_data : has_to_tactic_format rel_data :=
⟨λr, do
R ← pp r.relation,
α ← pp r.in_type,
β ← pp r.out_type,
return format!"({R}: rel ({α}) ({β}))" ⟩
private meta structure rule_data :=
(pr : expr)
(uparams : list name) -- levels not in pat
(params : list (expr × bool)) -- fst : local constant, snd = tt → param appears in pattern
(uargs : list name) -- levels not in pat
(args : list (expr × rel_data)) -- fst : local constant
(pat : pattern) -- `R c`
(output : expr) -- right-hand side `d` of rel equation `R c d`
meta instance has_to_tactic_format_rule_data : has_to_tactic_format rule_data :=
⟨λr, do
pr ← pp r.pr,
up ← pp r.uparams,
mp ← pp r.params,
ua ← pp r.uargs,
ma ← pp r.args,
pat ← pp r.pat.target,
output ← pp r.output,
return format!"{{ ⟨{pat}⟩ pr: {pr} → {output}, {up} {mp} {ua} {ma} }}" ⟩
private meta def get_lift_fun : expr → tactic (list rel_data × expr)
| e :=
do
{ guardb (is_constant_of (get_app_fn e) ``relator.lift_fun),
[α, β, γ, δ, R, S] ← return $ get_app_args e,
(ps, r) ← get_lift_fun S,
return (rel_data.mk α β R :: ps, r)} <|>
return ([], e)
private meta def mark_occurences (e : expr) : list expr → list (expr × bool)
| [] := []
| (h :: t) := let xs := mark_occurences t in
(h, occurs h e || any xs (λ⟨e, oc⟩, oc && occurs h e)) :: xs
private meta def analyse_rule (u' : list name) (pr : expr) : tactic rule_data := do
t ← infer_type pr,
(params, app (app r f) g) ← mk_local_pis t,
(arg_rels, R) ← get_lift_fun r,
args ← (enum arg_rels).mmap $ λ⟨n, a⟩,
prod.mk <$> mk_local_def (mk_simple_name ("a_" ++ repr n)) a.in_type <*> pure a,
a_vars ← return $ prod.fst <$> args,
p ← head_beta (app_of_list f a_vars),
p_data ← return $ mark_occurences (app R p) params,
p_vars ← return $ list.map prod.fst (p_data.filter (λx, ↑x.2)),
u ← return $ collect_univ_params (app R p) ∩ u',
pat ← mk_pattern (level.param <$> u) (p_vars ++ a_vars) (app R p) (level.param <$> u)
(p_vars ++ a_vars),
return $ rule_data.mk pr (u'.remove_all u) p_data u args pat g
meta def analyse_decls : list name → tactic (list rule_data) :=
mmap (λn, do
d ← get_decl n,
c ← return d.univ_params.length,
ls ← (repeat () c).mmap (λ_, mk_fresh_name),
analyse_rule ls (const n (ls.map level.param)))
private meta def split_params_args :
list (expr × bool) → list expr → list (expr × option expr) × list expr
| ((lc, tt) :: ps) (e :: es) := let (ps', es') :=
split_params_args ps es in ((lc, some e) :: ps', es')
| ((lc, ff) :: ps) es := let (ps', es') :=
split_params_args ps es in ((lc, none) :: ps', es')
| _ es := ([], es)
private meta def param_substitutions (ctxt : list expr) :
list (expr × option expr) → tactic (list (name × expr) × list expr)
| (((local_const n _ bi t), s) :: ps) := do
(e, m) ← match s with
| (some e) := return (e, [])
| none :=
let ctxt' := list.filter (λv, occurs v t) ctxt in
let ty := pis ctxt' t in
if bi = binder_info.inst_implicit then do
guard (bi = binder_info.inst_implicit),
e ← instantiate_mvars ty >>= mk_instance,
return (e, [])
else do
mv ← mk_meta_var ty,
return (app_of_list mv ctxt', [mv])
end,
sb ← return $ instantiate_local n e,
ps ← return $ prod.map sb ((<$>) sb) <$> ps,
(ms, vs) ← param_substitutions ps,
return ((n, e) :: ms, m ++ vs)
| _ := return ([], [])
/- input expression a type `R a`, it finds a type `b`, s.t. there is a proof of the type `R a b`.
It return (`a`, pr : `R a b`) -/
meta def compute_transfer : list rule_data → list expr → expr → tactic (expr × expr × list expr)
| rds ctxt e := do
-- Select matching rule
(i, ps, args, ms, rd) ← first (rds.map (λrd, do
(l, m) ← match_pattern rd.pat e semireducible,
level_map ← rd.uparams.mmap $ λl, prod.mk l <$> mk_meta_univ,
inst_univ ← return $ λe, instantiate_univ_params e (level_map ++ zip rd.uargs l),
(ps, args) ← return $ split_params_args (rd.params.map (prod.map inst_univ id)) m,
(ps, ms) ← param_substitutions ctxt ps, /- this checks type class parameters -/
return (instantiate_locals ps ∘ inst_univ, ps, args, ms, rd))) <|>
(do trace e, fail "no matching rule"),
(bs, hs, mss) ← (zip rd.args args).mmap (λ⟨⟨_, d⟩, e⟩, do
-- Argument has function type
(args, r) ← get_lift_fun (i d.relation),
((a_vars, b_vars), (R_vars, bnds)) ← (enum args).mmap (λ⟨n, arg⟩, do
a ← mk_local_def sformat!"a{n}" arg.in_type,
b ← mk_local_def sformat!"b{n}" arg.out_type,
R ← mk_local_def sformat!"R{n}" (arg.relation a b),
return ((a, b), (R, [a, b, R]))) >>= (return ∘ prod.map unzip unzip ∘ unzip),
rds' ← R_vars.mmap (analyse_rule []),
-- Transfer argument
a ← return $ i e,
a' ← head_beta (app_of_list a a_vars),
(b, pr, ms) ← compute_transfer (rds ++ rds') (ctxt ++ a_vars) (app r a'),
b' ← head_eta (lambdas b_vars b),
return (b', [a, b', lambdas (list.join bnds) pr], ms)) >>= (return ∘ prod.map id unzip ∘ unzip),
-- Combine
b ← head_beta (app_of_list (i rd.output) bs),
pr ← return $ app_of_list (i rd.pr) (prod.snd <$> ps ++ list.join hs),
return (b, pr, ms ++ mss.join)
end transfer
open transfer
meta def tactic.transfer (ds : list name) : tactic unit := do
rds ← analyse_decls ds,
tgt ← target,
(guard (¬ tgt.has_meta_var) <|>
fail "Target contains (universe) meta variables. This is not supported by transfer."),
(new_tgt, pr, ms) ← compute_transfer rds [] ((const `iff [] : expr) tgt),
new_pr ← mk_meta_var new_tgt,
/- Setup final tactic state -/
exact ((const `iff.mpr [] : expr) tgt new_tgt pr new_pr),
ms ← ms.mmap (λm, (get_assignment m >> return []) <|> return [m]),
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals (ms.join ++ new_pr :: gs)
|
59be4c8bfa5c62beab09a93486e1ac88eab9b034 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/polynomial/eval.lean | c5f252ab8e26776cb6510a6cde3d8daa383cf0c7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,299 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.induction
import data.polynomial.degree.definitions
import deprecated.ring
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The main defs here are `eval₂`, `eval`, and `map`.
We give several lemmas about their interaction with each other and with module operations.
-/
noncomputable theory
open finsupp finset add_monoid_algebra
open_locale big_operators
namespace polynomial
universes u v w y
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] {p q r : polynomial R}
section
variables [semiring S]
variables (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar ring
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target -/
def eval₂ (p : polynomial R) : S :=
p.sum (λ e a, f a * x ^ e)
lemma eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum (λ e a, f a * x ^ e) := rfl
lemma eval₂_eq_lift_nc {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : eval₂ f x = lift_nc ↑f (powers_hom S x) := rfl
lemma eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S]
{f g : R →+* S} {s t : S} {φ ψ : polynomial R} :
f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ :=
by rintro rfl rfl rfl; refl
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) :=
begin
-- This proof is lame, and the `finsupp` API shows through.
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero, mul_one, finsupp.sum_ite_eq'],
split_ifs,
{ refl, },
{ simp only [not_not, finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne.def] at h,
apply_fun f at h,
simpa using h.symm, },
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_zero : (0 : polynomial R).eval₂ f x = 0 :=
finsupp.sum_zero_index
@[simp] lemma eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a :=
(sum_single_index $ by rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul]).trans $ by simp [pow_zero, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x :=
(sum_single_index $ by rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul]).trans $ by rw [f.map_one, one_mul, pow_one]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = (f r) * x^n :=
begin
apply sum_single_index,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X^n).eval₂ f x = x^n :=
begin
rw X_pow_eq_monomial,
convert eval₂_monomial f x,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x :=
finsupp.sum_add_index
(λ _, by rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul])
(λ _ _ _, by rw [f.map_add, add_mul])
@[simp] lemma eval₂_one : (1 : polynomial R).eval₂ f x = 1 :=
by rw [← C_1, eval₂_C, f.map_one]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval₂ f x = bit0 (p.eval₂ f x) :=
by rw [bit0, eval₂_add, bit0]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval₂ f x = bit1 (p.eval₂ f x) :=
by rw [bit1, eval₂_add, eval₂_bit0, eval₂_one, bit1]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_smul (g : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) (x : S) {s : R} :
eval₂ g x (s • p) = g s * eval₂ g x p :=
begin
simp only [eval₂, sum_smul_index, forall_const, zero_mul, g.map_zero, g.map_mul, mul_assoc],
rw [←finsupp.mul_sum],
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_C_X : eval₂ C X p = p :=
polynomial.induction_on' p (λ p q hp hq, by simp [hp, hq])
(λ n x, by rw [eval₂_monomial, monomial_eq_smul_X, C_mul'])
instance eval₂.is_add_monoid_hom : is_add_monoid_hom (eval₂ f x) :=
{ map_zero := eval₂_zero _ _, map_add := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _ }
@[simp] lemma eval₂_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : (n : polynomial R).eval₂ f x = n :=
nat.rec_on n rfl $ λ n ih, by rw [n.cast_succ, eval₂_add, ih, eval₂_one, n.cast_succ]
variables [semiring T]
lemma eval₂_sum (p : polynomial T) (g : ℕ → T → polynomial R) (x : S) :
(p.sum g).eval₂ f x = p.sum (λ n a, (g n a).eval₂ f x) :=
finsupp.sum_sum_index (by simp [is_add_monoid_hom.map_zero f])
(by intros; simp [right_distrib, is_add_monoid_hom.map_add f])
lemma eval₂_finset_sum (s : finset ι) (g : ι → polynomial R) (x : S) :
(∑ i in s, g i).eval₂ f x = ∑ i in s, (g i).eval₂ f x :=
begin
classical,
induction s using finset.induction with p hp s hs, simp,
rw [sum_insert, eval₂_add, hs, sum_insert]; assumption,
end
lemma eval₂_mul_noncomm (hf : ∀ k, commute (f $ q.coeff k) x) :
eval₂ f x (p * q) = eval₂ f x p * eval₂ f x q :=
begin
simp only [eval₂_eq_lift_nc],
exact lift_nc_mul _ _ p q (λ k n hn, (hf k).pow_right n)
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_mul_X : eval₂ f x (p * X) = eval₂ f x p * x :=
begin
refine trans (eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ $ λ k, _) (by rw eval₂_X),
rcases em (k = 1) with (rfl|hk),
{ simp },
{ simp [coeff_X_of_ne_one hk] }
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_X_mul : eval₂ f x (X * p) = eval₂ f x p * x :=
by rw [X_mul, eval₂_mul_X]
lemma eval₂_mul_C' (h : commute (f a) x) : eval₂ f x (p * C a) = eval₂ f x p * f a :=
begin
rw [eval₂_mul_noncomm, eval₂_C],
intro k,
obtain (hk|(hk : _ = _)) : (C a).coeff k ∈ ({0, a} : set R) := finsupp.single_apply_mem _;
simp [hk, h]
end
lemma eval₂_list_prod_noncomm (ps : list (polynomial R))
(hf : ∀ (p ∈ ps) k, commute (f $ coeff p k) x) :
eval₂ f x ps.prod = (ps.map (polynomial.eval₂ f x)).prod :=
begin
induction ps using list.reverse_rec_on with ps p ihp,
{ simp },
{ simp only [list.forall_mem_append, list.forall_mem_singleton] at hf,
simp [eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ hf.2, ihp hf.1] }
end
/-- `eval₂` as a `ring_hom` for noncommutative rings -/
def eval₂_ring_hom' (f : R →+* S) (x : S) (hf : ∀ a, commute (f a) x) : polynomial R →+* S :=
{ to_fun := eval₂ f x,
map_add' := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _,
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _,
map_mul' := λ p q, eval₂_mul_noncomm f x (λ k, hf $ coeff q k),
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _ }
end
/-!
We next prove that eval₂ is multiplicative
as long as target ring is commutative
(even if the source ring is not).
-/
section eval₂
variables [comm_semiring S]
variables (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
@[simp] lemma eval₂_mul : (p * q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x * q.eval₂ f x :=
eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ $ λ k, commute.all _ _
lemma eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left (q : polynomial R) (hp : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 :=
begin
rw eval₂_mul f x,
exact mul_eq_zero_of_left hp (q.eval₂ f x)
end
lemma eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right (p : polynomial R) (hq : q.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 :=
begin
rw eval₂_mul f x,
exact mul_eq_zero_of_right (p.eval₂ f x) hq
end
instance eval₂.is_semiring_hom : is_semiring_hom (eval₂ f x) :=
⟨eval₂_zero _ _, eval₂_one _ _, λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _, λ _ _, eval₂_mul _ _⟩
/-- `eval₂` as a `ring_hom` -/
def eval₂_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) (x) : polynomial R →+* S :=
ring_hom.of (eval₂ f x)
@[simp] lemma coe_eval₂_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) (x) : ⇑(eval₂_ring_hom f x) = eval₂ f x := rfl
lemma eval₂_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x ^ n := (eval₂_ring_hom _ _).map_pow _ _
lemma eval₂_eq_sum_range :
p.eval₂ f x = ∑ i in finset.range (p.nat_degree + 1), f (p.coeff i) * x^i :=
trans (congr_arg _ p.as_sum_range) (trans (eval₂_finset_sum f _ _ x) (congr_arg _ (by simp)))
lemma eval₂_eq_sum_range' (f : R →+* S) {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.nat_degree < n) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x p = ∑ i in finset.range n, f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i :=
begin
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, p.sum_over_range' _ _ hn],
intro i,
rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul]
end
end eval₂
section eval
variables {x : R}
/-- `eval x p` is the evaluation of the polynomial `p` at `x` -/
def eval : R → polynomial R → R := eval₂ (ring_hom.id _)
lemma eval_eq_sum : p.eval x = sum p (λ e a, a * x ^ e) :=
rfl
lemma eval_eq_finset_sum (P : polynomial R) (x : R) :
eval x P = ∑ i in range (P.nat_degree + 1), P.coeff i * x ^ i :=
begin
rw eval_eq_sum,
refine P.sum_of_support_subset _ _ _,
{ intros a,
rw [mem_range, nat.lt_add_one_iff],
exact le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp a },
{ intros,
exact zero_mul _ }
end
lemma eval_eq_finset_sum' (P : polynomial R) :
(λ x, eval x P) = (λ x, ∑ i in range (P.nat_degree + 1), P.coeff i * x ^ i) :=
begin
ext,
exact P.eval_eq_finset_sum x
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_apply {S : Type*} [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (r : R) :
p.eval₂ f (f r) = f (p.eval r) :=
begin
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval_eq_sum, finsupp.sum, finsupp.sum, f.map_sum],
simp only [f.map_mul, f.map_pow],
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_one {S : Type*} [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) : p.eval₂ f 1 = f (p.eval 1) :=
begin
convert eval₂_at_apply f 1,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_nat_cast {S : Type*} [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) :
p.eval₂ f n = f (p.eval n) :=
begin
convert eval₂_at_apply f n,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma eval_C : (C a).eval x = a := eval₂_C _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_nat_cast {n : ℕ} : (n : polynomial R).eval x = n :=
by simp only [←C_eq_nat_cast, eval_C]
@[simp] lemma eval_X : X.eval x = x := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).eval x = a * x^n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_zero : (0 : polynomial R).eval x = 0 := eval₂_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_add : (p + q).eval x = p.eval x + q.eval x := eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_one : (1 : polynomial R).eval x = 1 := eval₂_one _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval x = bit0 (p.eval x) := eval₂_bit0 _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval x = bit1 (p.eval x) := eval₂_bit1 _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_smul (p : polynomial R) (x : R) {s : R} :
(s • p).eval x = s * p.eval x :=
eval₂_smul (ring_hom.id _) _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_C_mul : (C a * p).eval x = a * p.eval x :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q ph qh,
simp only [mul_add, eval_add, ph, qh], },
{ intros n b,
simp [mul_assoc], }
end
@[simp] lemma eval_nat_cast_mul {n : ℕ} : ((n : polynomial R) * p).eval x = n * p.eval x :=
by rw [←C_eq_nat_cast, eval_C_mul]
@[simp] lemma eval_mul_X : (p * X).eval x = p.eval x * x :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q ph qh,
simp only [add_mul, eval_add, ph, qh], },
{ intros n a,
simp only [←monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, eval_monomial,
mul_one, pow_succ', mul_assoc], }
end
@[simp] lemma eval_mul_X_pow {k : ℕ} : (p * X^k).eval x = p.eval x * x^k :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [pow_succ', ←mul_assoc, ih], }
end
lemma eval_sum (p : polynomial R) (f : ℕ → R → polynomial R) (x : R) :
(p.sum f).eval x = p.sum (λ n a, (f n a).eval x) :=
eval₂_sum _ _ _ _
lemma eval_finset_sum (s : finset ι) (g : ι → polynomial R) (x : R) :
(∑ i in s, g i).eval x = ∑ i in s, (g i).eval x := eval₂_finset_sum _ _ _ _
/-- `is_root p x` implies `x` is a root of `p`. The evaluation of `p` at `x` is zero -/
def is_root (p : polynomial R) (a : R) : Prop := p.eval a = 0
instance [decidable_eq R] : decidable (is_root p a) := by unfold is_root; apply_instance
@[simp] lemma is_root.def : is_root p a ↔ p.eval a = 0 := iff.rfl
lemma coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero (p : polynomial R) :
coeff p 0 = p.eval 0 :=
calc coeff p 0 = coeff p 0 * 0 ^ 0 : by simp
... = p.eval 0 : eq.symm $
finset.sum_eq_single _ (λ b _ hb, by simp [zero_pow (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb)]) (by simp)
lemma zero_is_root_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero {p : polynomial R} (hp : p.coeff 0 = 0) :
is_root p 0 :=
by rwa coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero at hp
end eval
section comp
/-- The composition of polynomials as a polynomial. -/
def comp (p q : polynomial R) : polynomial R := p.eval₂ C q
lemma comp_eq_sum_left : p.comp q = p.sum (λ e a, C a * q ^ e) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_X : p.comp X = p :=
begin
simp only [comp, eval₂, ← single_eq_C_mul_X],
exact finsupp.sum_single _,
end
@[simp] lemma X_comp : X.comp p = p := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] lemma comp_C : p.comp (C a) = C (p.eval a) :=
begin
dsimp [comp, eval₂, eval, sum_def],
rw [← p.support.sum_hom (@C R _)],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl; simp
end
@[simp] lemma C_comp : (C a).comp p = C a := eval₂_C _ _
@[simp] lemma nat_cast_comp {n : ℕ} : (n : polynomial R).comp p = n :=
by rw [←C_eq_nat_cast, C_comp]
@[simp] lemma comp_zero : p.comp (0 : polynomial R) = C (p.eval 0) :=
by rw [← C_0, comp_C]
@[simp] lemma zero_comp : comp (0 : polynomial R) p = 0 :=
by rw [← C_0, C_comp]
@[simp] lemma comp_one : p.comp 1 = C (p.eval 1) :=
by rw [← C_1, comp_C]
@[simp] lemma one_comp : comp (1 : polynomial R) p = 1 :=
by rw [← C_1, C_comp]
@[simp] lemma add_comp : (p + q).comp r = p.comp r + q.comp r := eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] lemma monomial_comp (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).comp p = C a * p^n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
@[simp] lemma mul_X_comp : (p * X).comp r = p.comp r * r :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq, add_mul], },
{ intros n b, simp [pow_succ', mul_assoc], }
end
@[simp] lemma X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (X^k).comp p = p^k :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [pow_succ', mul_X_comp, ih], },
end
@[simp] lemma mul_X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (p * X^k).comp r = p.comp r * r^k :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [ih, pow_succ', ←mul_assoc, mul_X_comp], },
end
@[simp] lemma C_mul_comp : (C a * p).comp r = C a * p.comp r :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq, mul_add], },
{ intros n b, simp [mul_assoc], }
end
@[simp] lemma nat_cast_mul_comp {n : ℕ} : ((n : polynomial R) * p).comp r = n * p.comp r :=
by rw [←C_eq_nat_cast, C_mul_comp, C_eq_nat_cast]
@[simp] lemma mul_comp {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (p q r : polynomial R) :
(p * q).comp r = p.comp r * q.comp r := eval₂_mul _ _
@[simp] lemma pow_comp {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (p q : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
(p^n).comp q = (p.comp q)^n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [pow_succ, ih], },
end
@[simp] lemma bit0_comp : comp (bit0 p : polynomial R) q = bit0 (p.comp q) :=
by simp only [bit0, add_comp]
@[simp] lemma bit1_comp : comp (bit1 p : polynomial R) q = bit1 (p.comp q) :=
by simp only [bit1, add_comp, bit0_comp, one_comp]
lemma comp_assoc {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (φ ψ χ : polynomial R) :
(φ.comp ψ).comp χ = φ.comp (ψ.comp χ) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on φ;
{ intros, simp only [add_comp, mul_comp, C_comp, X_comp, pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, *] at * }
end
end comp
section map
variables [semiring S]
variables (f : R →+* S)
/-- `map f p` maps a polynomial `p` across a ring hom `f` -/
def map : polynomial R → polynomial S := eval₂ (C.comp f) X
instance is_semiring_hom_C_f : is_semiring_hom (C ∘ f) :=
is_semiring_hom.comp _ _
@[simp] lemma map_C : (C a).map f = C (f a) := eval₂_C _ _
@[simp] lemma map_X : X.map f = X := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] lemma map_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).map f = monomial n (f a) :=
begin
dsimp only [map],
rw [eval₂_monomial, single_eq_C_mul_X], refl,
end
@[simp] lemma map_zero : (0 : polynomial R).map f = 0 := eval₂_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma map_add : (p + q).map f = p.map f + q.map f := eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] lemma map_one : (1 : polynomial R).map f = 1 := eval₂_one _ _
@[simp] theorem map_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : (n : polynomial R).map f = n :=
nat.rec_on n rfl $ λ n ih, by rw [n.cast_succ, map_add, ih, map_one, n.cast_succ]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_map (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.map f) n = f (coeff p n) :=
begin
rw [map, eval₂, coeff_sum, sum_def],
conv_rhs { rw [← sum_C_mul_X_eq p, coeff_sum, sum_def,
← p.support.sum_hom f], },
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
simp [function.comp, coeff_C_mul_X, f.map_mul],
split_ifs; simp [is_semiring_hom.map_zero f],
end
lemma map_map [semiring T] (g : S →+* T)
(p : polynomial R) : (p.map f).map g = p.map (g.comp f) :=
ext (by simp [coeff_map])
@[simp] lemma map_id : p.map (ring_hom.id _) = p := by simp [polynomial.ext_iff, coeff_map]
lemma eval₂_eq_eval_map {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = (p.map f).eval x :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq], },
{ intros n r, simp, }
end
lemma map_injective (hf : function.injective f) : function.injective (map f) :=
λ p q h, ext $ λ m, hf $ by rw [← coeff_map f, ← coeff_map f, h]
lemma map_surjective (hf : function.surjective f) : function.surjective (map f) :=
λ p, polynomial.induction_on' p
(λ p q hp hq, let ⟨p', hp'⟩ := hp, ⟨q', hq'⟩ := hq in ⟨p' + q', by rw [map_add f, hp', hq']⟩)
(λ n s, let ⟨r, hr⟩ := hf s in ⟨monomial n r, by rw [map_monomial f, hr]⟩)
variables {f}
lemma map_monic_eq_zero_iff (hp : p.monic) : p.map f = 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
⟨ λ hfp x, calc f x = f x * f p.leading_coeff : by simp [hp]
... = f x * (p.map f).coeff p.nat_degree : by { congr, apply (coeff_map _ _).symm }
... = 0 : by simp [hfp],
λ h, ext (λ n, trans (coeff_map f n) (h _)) ⟩
lemma map_monic_ne_zero (hp : p.monic) [nontrivial S] : p.map f ≠ 0 :=
λ h, f.map_one_ne_zero ((map_monic_eq_zero_iff hp).mp h _)
variables (f)
open is_semiring_hom
-- If the rings were commutative, we could prove this just using `eval₂_mul`.
-- TODO this proof is just a hack job on the proof of `eval₂_mul`,
-- using that `X` is central. It should probably be golfed!
@[simp] lemma map_mul : (p * q).map f = p.map f * q.map f :=
begin
dunfold map,
dunfold eval₂,
rw [add_monoid_algebra.mul_def, finsupp.sum_mul _ p], simp only [finsupp.mul_sum _ q],
rw [sum_sum_index],
{ apply sum_congr rfl, assume i hi, dsimp only, rw [sum_sum_index],
{ apply sum_congr rfl, assume j hj, dsimp only,
rw [sum_single_index, (C.comp f).map_mul, pow_add],
{ simp [←mul_assoc], conv_lhs { rw ←@X_pow_mul_assoc _ _ _ _ i }, },
{ simp, } },
{ intro, simp, },
{ intros, simp [add_mul], } },
{ intro, simp, },
{ intros, simp [add_mul], }
end
instance map.is_semiring_hom : is_semiring_hom (map f) :=
{ map_zero := eval₂_zero _ _,
map_one := eval₂_one _ _,
map_add := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _,
map_mul := λ _ _, map_mul f, }
/-- `polynomial.map` as a `ring_hom` -/
def map_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) : polynomial R →+* polynomial S :=
{ to_fun := polynomial.map f,
map_add' := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _,
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _,
map_mul' := λ _ _, map_mul f,
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_map_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) : ⇑(map_ring_hom f) = map f := rfl
lemma map_list_prod (L : list (polynomial R)) : L.prod.map f = (L.map $ map f).prod :=
eq.symm $ list.prod_hom _ (monoid_hom.of (map f))
@[simp] lemma map_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).map f = p.map f ^ n := is_monoid_hom.map_pow (map f) _ _
lemma mem_map_range {p : polynomial S} :
p ∈ set.range (map f) ↔ ∀ n, p.coeff n ∈ (set.range f) :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩ n, rw coeff_map, exact set.mem_range_self _ },
{ intro h, rw p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow,
apply is_add_submonoid.finset_sum_mem,
intros i hi,
rcases h i with ⟨c, hc⟩,
use [C c * X^i],
rw [map_mul, map_C, hc, map_pow, map_X] }
end
lemma eval₂_map [semiring T] (g : S →+* T) (x : T) :
(p.map f).eval₂ g x = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) x :=
begin
convert finsupp.sum_map_range_index _,
{ change map f p = map_range f _ p,
ext,
rw map_range_apply,
exact coeff_map f a, },
{ exact f.map_zero, },
{ intro a, simp only [ring_hom.map_zero, zero_mul], },
end
lemma eval_map (x : S) : (p.map f).eval x = p.eval₂ f x :=
eval₂_map f (ring_hom.id _) x
lemma map_sum {ι : Type*} (g : ι → polynomial R) (s : finset ι) :
(∑ i in s, g i).map f = ∑ i in s, (g i).map f :=
eq.symm $ sum_hom _ _
lemma map_comp (p q : polynomial R) : map f (p.comp q) = (map f p).comp (map f q) :=
polynomial.induction_on p
(by simp)
(by simp {contextual := tt})
(by simp [pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, polynomial.comp] {contextual := tt})
@[simp]
lemma eval_zero_map (f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) :
(p.map f).eval 0 = f (p.eval 0) :=
by simp [←coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero]
@[simp]
lemma eval_one_map (f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) :
(p.map f).eval 1 = f (p.eval 1) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq], },
{ intros n r, simp, }
end
@[simp]
lemma eval_nat_cast_map (f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
(p.map f).eval n = f (p.eval n) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq], },
{ intros n r, simp, }
end
@[simp]
lemma eval_int_cast_map {R S : Type*} [ring R] [ring S]
(f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) (i : ℤ) :
(p.map f).eval i = f (p.eval i) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq], },
{ intros n r, simp, }
end
end map
/-!
After having set up the basic theory of `eval₂`, `eval`, `comp`, and `map`,
we make `eval₂` irreducible.
Perhaps we can make the others irreducible too?
-/
attribute [irreducible] polynomial.eval₂
section hom_eval₂
-- TODO: Here we need commutativity in both `S` and `T`?
variables [comm_semiring S] [comm_semiring T]
variables (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) (p)
lemma hom_eval₂ (x : S) : g (p.eval₂ f x) = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) (g x) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on p; clear p,
{ intros a, rw [eval₂_C, eval₂_C], refl, },
{ intros p q hp hq, simp only [hp, hq, eval₂_add, g.map_add] },
{ intros n a ih,
simp only [eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_X_pow, g.map_mul, g.map_pow],
refl, }
end
end hom_eval₂
end semiring
section comm_semiring
section eval
variables [comm_semiring R] {p q : polynomial R} {x : R}
lemma eval₂_comp [comm_semiring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} :
eval₂ f x (p.comp q) = eval₂ f (eval₂ f x q) p :=
by rw [comp, p.as_sum_range]; simp [eval₂_finset_sum, eval₂_pow]
@[simp] lemma eval_mul : (p * q).eval x = p.eval x * q.eval x := eval₂_mul _ _
instance eval.is_semiring_hom : is_semiring_hom (eval x) := eval₂.is_semiring_hom _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).eval x = p.eval x ^ n := eval₂_pow _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma eval_comp : (p.comp q).eval x = p.eval (q.eval x) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros r s hr hs, simp [add_comp, hr, hs], },
{ intros n a, simp, }
end
instance comp.is_semiring_hom : is_semiring_hom (λ q : polynomial R, q.comp p) :=
by unfold comp; apply_instance
lemma eval₂_hom [comm_semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : R) :
p.eval₂ f (f x) = f (p.eval x) :=
(ring_hom.comp_id f) ▸ (hom_eval₂ p (ring_hom.id R) f x).symm
lemma root_mul_left_of_is_root (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R} :
is_root q a → is_root (p * q) a :=
λ H, by rw [is_root, eval_mul, is_root.def.1 H, mul_zero]
lemma root_mul_right_of_is_root {p : polynomial R} (q : polynomial R) :
is_root p a → is_root (p * q) a :=
λ H, by rw [is_root, eval_mul, is_root.def.1 H, zero_mul]
/--
Polynomial evaluation commutes with finset.prod
-/
lemma eval_prod {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (p : ι → polynomial R) (x : R) :
eval x (∏ j in s, p j) = ∏ j in s, eval x (p j) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
{ simp only [finset.prod_empty, eval_one] },
{ intros j s hj hpj,
have h0 : ∏ i in insert j s, eval x (p i) = (eval x (p j)) * ∏ i in s, eval x (p i),
{ apply finset.prod_insert hj },
rw [h0, ← hpj, finset.prod_insert hj, eval_mul] },
end
end eval
section map
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
lemma map_multiset_prod (m : multiset (polynomial R)) : m.prod.map f = (m.map $ map f).prod :=
eq.symm $ multiset.prod_hom _ (monoid_hom.of (map f))
lemma map_prod {ι : Type*} (g : ι → polynomial R) (s : finset ι) :
(∏ i in s, g i).map f = ∏ i in s, (g i).map f :=
eq.symm $ prod_hom _ _
lemma support_map_subset (p : polynomial R) : (map f p).support ⊆ p.support :=
begin
intros x,
simp only [mem_support_iff],
contrapose!,
change p.coeff x = 0 → (map f p).coeff x = 0,
rw coeff_map,
intro hx,
rw hx,
exact ring_hom.map_zero f,
end
end map
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] {p q r : polynomial R}
lemma C_neg : C (-a) = -C a := ring_hom.map_neg C a
lemma C_sub : C (a - b) = C a - C b := ring_hom.map_sub C a b
instance map.is_ring_hom {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) : is_ring_hom (map f) :=
by apply is_ring_hom.of_semiring
@[simp] lemma map_sub {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
(p - q).map f = p.map f - q.map f :=
is_ring_hom.map_sub _
@[simp] lemma map_neg {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
(-p).map f = -(p.map f) :=
is_ring_hom.map_neg _
@[simp] lemma map_int_cast {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℤ) :
map f ↑n = ↑n :=
(ring_hom.of (map f)).map_int_cast n
@[simp] lemma eval_int_cast {n : ℤ} {x : R} : (n : polynomial R).eval x = n :=
by simp only [←C_eq_int_cast, eval_C]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_neg {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} :
(-p).eval₂ f x = -p.eval₂ f x :=
by rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ←eval₂_add, add_left_neg, eval₂_zero]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_sub {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} :
(p - q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x - q.eval₂ f x :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, eval₂_add, eval₂_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma eval_neg (p : polynomial R) (x : R) : (-p).eval x = -p.eval x :=
eval₂_neg _
@[simp] lemma eval_sub (p q : polynomial R) (x : R) : (p - q).eval x = p.eval x - q.eval x :=
eval₂_sub _
lemma root_X_sub_C : is_root (X - C a) b ↔ a = b :=
by rw [is_root.def, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma neg_comp : (-p).comp q = -p.comp q := eval₂_neg _
@[simp] lemma sub_comp : (p - q).comp r = p.comp r - q.comp r := eval₂_sub _
@[simp] lemma cast_int_comp (i : ℤ) : comp (i : polynomial R) p = i :=
by cases i; simp
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] {p q : polynomial R}
instance eval₂.is_ring_hom {S} [comm_ring S]
(f : R →+* S) {x : S} : is_ring_hom (eval₂ f x) :=
by apply is_ring_hom.of_semiring
instance eval.is_ring_hom {x : R} : is_ring_hom (eval x) := eval₂.is_ring_hom _
end comm_ring
end polynomial
|
a831cb05c1d18f1ec895603ad517f313fd7b14bf | 54deab7025df5d2df4573383df7e1e5497b7a2c2 | /data/list/sort.lean | 4a1bb9136e75317b61cc7e43db8bb65390356cbf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | HGldJ1966/mathlib | f8daac93a5b4ae805cfb0ecebac21a9ce9469009 | c5c5b504b918a6c5e91e372ee29ed754b0513e85 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,340,395,683 | 1,503,040,489,000 | 1,503,040,489,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,792 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad
Insertion sort and merge sort.
-/
import data.list.perm
namespace list
section sorted
universe variable uu
variables {α : Type uu} (r : α → α → Prop)
def sorted : list α → Prop
| [] := true
| (a :: l) := sorted l ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, r a b
theorem sorted_nil : sorted r nil := trivial
theorem sorted_singleton (a : α) : sorted r [a] :=
⟨sorted_nil r, λ b h, absurd h (not_mem_nil b)⟩
theorem sorted_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : sorted r (a :: l)) : sorted r l :=
h.left
theorem forall_mem_rel_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : sorted r (a :: l)) :
∀ b ∈ l, r a b :=
h.right
theorem sorted_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : sorted r l) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ l, r a b) :
sorted r (a :: l) :=
⟨h₁, h₂⟩
end sorted
/-
sorting procedures
-/
section sort
universe variable uu
parameters {α : Type uu} (r : α → α → Prop) [decidable_rel r]
local infix `≼` : 50 := r
/- insertion sort -/
section insertion_sort
def ordered_insert (a : α) : list α → list α
| [] := [a]
| (b :: l) := if a ≼ b then a :: b :: l else b :: ordered_insert l
--@[simp] theorem ordered_insert_nil (a : α) : ordered_insert a [] = [a] := rfl
--@[simp] theorem ordered_insert_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
-- ordered_insert a (b :: l) = if a ≼ b then a :: (b :: l) else b :: ordered_insert a l :=
--rfl
def insertion_sort : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (b :: l) := ordered_insert b (insertion_sort l)
--attribute [simp] insertion_sort.equations.eqn_1 insertion_sort.equations.eqn_2
section correctness
parameter [deceqα : decidable_eq α]
include deceqα
open perm
theorem perm_ordered_insert (a) : ∀ l : list α, ordered_insert a l ~ a :: l
| [] := perm.refl _
| (b :: l) := by simp [ordered_insert]; by_cases a ≼ b; simp [h];
exact (perm.skip _ (perm_ordered_insert l)).trans (perm.swap _ _ _)
theorem perm_insertion_sort : ∀ l : list α, insertion_sort l ~ l
| [] := perm.nil
| (b :: l) := by simp [insertion_sort]; exact
(perm_ordered_insert _ _ _).trans (perm.skip b (perm_insertion_sort l))
section total_and_transitive
variables (totr : total r) (transr : transitive r)
include totr transr
theorem sorted_ordered_insert (a : α) : ∀ l, sorted r l → sorted r (ordered_insert a l)
| [] h := sorted_singleton r a
| (b :: l) h := begin
simp [ordered_insert]; by_cases a ≼ b with h'; simp [h'],
{ rw [sorted], refine ⟨h, λ b' bm, _⟩,
simp at bm, cases bm with be bm,
{ subst b', exact h' },
{ exact transr h' (h.right _ bm) } },
{ rw [sorted], refine ⟨sorted_ordered_insert l h.left, λ b' bm, _⟩,
have bm := mem_of_perm (perm_ordered_insert _ _ _) bm,
simp at bm, cases bm with be bm,
{ subst b', exact (totr _ _).resolve_left h' },
{ exact h.right _ bm } }
end
theorem sorted_insert_sort : ∀ l, sorted r (insertion_sort l)
| [] := sorted_nil r
| (a :: l) := sorted_ordered_insert totr transr a _ (sorted_insert_sort l)
end total_and_transitive
end correctness
end insertion_sort
/- merge sort -/
section merge_sort
-- TODO(Jeremy): observation: if instead we write (a :: (split l).1, b :: (split l).2), the
-- equation compiler can't prove the third equation
def split : list α → list α × list α
| [] := ([], [])
| (a :: l) := let (l₁, l₂) := split l in (a :: l₂, l₁)
attribute [simp] split
theorem split_cons_of_eq (a : α) {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : split l = (l₁, l₂)) :
split (a :: l) = (a :: l₂, l₁) :=
by rw [split, h]; refl
theorem length_split_le : ∀ {l l₁ l₂ : list α},
split l = (l₁, l₂) → length l₁ ≤ length l ∧ length l₂ ≤ length l
| [] ._ ._ rfl := ⟨nat.le_refl 0, nat.le_refl 0⟩
| (a::l) l₁' l₂' h := begin
ginduction split l with e l₁ l₂,
injection (split_cons_of_eq _ e).symm.trans h,
subst l₁', subst l₂',
cases length_split_le e with h₁ h₂,
exact ⟨nat.succ_le_succ h₂, nat.le_succ_of_le h₁⟩
end
theorem length_split_lt {a b} {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : split (a::b::l) = (l₁, l₂)) :
length l₁ < length (a::b::l) ∧ length l₂ < length (a::b::l) :=
begin
ginduction split l with e l₁' l₂',
injection (split_cons_of_eq _ (split_cons_of_eq _ e)).symm.trans h,
subst l₁, subst l₂,
cases length_split_le e with h₁ h₂,
exact ⟨nat.succ_le_succ (nat.succ_le_succ h₁), nat.succ_le_succ (nat.succ_le_succ h₂)⟩
end
theorem perm_split : ∀ {l l₁ l₂ : list α}, split l = (l₁, l₂) → l ~ l₁ ++ l₂
| [] ._ ._ rfl := perm.refl _
| (a::l) l₁' l₂' h := begin
ginduction split l with e l₁ l₂,
injection (split_cons_of_eq _ e).symm.trans h,
subst l₁', subst l₂',
exact perm.skip a ((perm_split e).trans perm.perm_app_comm),
end
def merge : list α → list α → list α
| [] l' := l'
| l [] := l
| (a :: l) (b :: l') := if a ≼ b then a :: merge l (b :: l') else b :: merge (a :: l) l'
include r
def merge_sort : list α → list α
| [] := []
| [a] := [a]
| (a::b::l) := begin
ginduction split (a::b::l) with e l₁ l₂,
cases length_split_lt e with h₁ h₂,
exact merge r (merge_sort l₁) (merge_sort l₂)
end
using_well_founded {
rel_tac := λ_ _, `[exact ⟨_, inv_image.wf length nat.lt_wf⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption }
theorem merge_sort_cons_cons {a b} {l l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : split (a::b::l) = (l₁, l₂)) :
merge_sort (a::b::l) = merge (merge_sort l₁) (merge_sort l₂) :=
begin
simp [merge_sort, h], dsimp,
have : ∀ (L : list α) h1, @@and.rec
(λ a a (_ : length l₁ < length l + 1 + 1 ∧
length l₂ < length l + 1 + 1), L) h1 h1 = L,
{ intros, cases h1, refl },
apply this
end
section correctness
parameter [deceqα : decidable_eq α]
include deceqα
theorem perm_merge : ∀ (l l' : list α), merge l l' ~ l ++ l'
| [] [] := perm.nil
| [] (b :: l') := by simp [merge]
| (a :: l) [] := by simp [merge]
| (a :: l) (b :: l') := by simp [merge]; by_cases a ≼ b; simp [h];
[exact perm.skip _ (perm_merge _ _),
exact (perm.skip _ (perm_merge _ _)).trans
(perm.trans (perm.swap _ _ _) (perm.skip _ (perm.perm_middle _ _ _)))]
theorem perm_merge_sort : ∀ l : list α, merge_sort l ~ l
| [] := perm.refl _
| [a] := perm.refl _
| (a::b::l) := begin
ginduction split (a::b::l) with e l₁ l₂,
cases length_split_lt e with h₁ h₂,
rw [merge_sort_cons_cons r e],
apply (perm_merge r _ _).trans,
exact (perm.perm_app (perm_merge_sort l₁) (perm_merge_sort l₂)).trans (perm_split e).symm
end
using_well_founded {
rel_tac := λ_ _, `[exact ⟨_, inv_image.wf length nat.lt_wf⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption }
section total_and_transitive
variables (totr : total r) (transr : transitive r)
include totr transr
theorem sorted_merge : ∀ {l l' : list α}, sorted r l → sorted r l' → sorted r (merge l l')
| [] [] h₁ h₂ := trivial
| [] (b :: l') h₁ h₂ := by simp [merge]; exact h₂
| (a :: l) [] h₁ h₂ := by simp [merge]; exact h₁
| (a :: l) (b :: l') h₁ h₂ := begin
simp [merge]; by_cases a ≼ b; simp [h],
{ refine ⟨sorted_merge h₁.left h₂, λ b' bm, _⟩,
have bm := perm.mem_of_perm (perm_merge _ _ _) bm,
simp at bm,
cases bm with be bm,
{ subst b', assumption },
cases bm with bl bl',
{ exact h₁.right _ bl },
{ exact transr h (h₂.right _ bl') } },
{ refine ⟨sorted_merge h₁ h₂.left, λ b' bm, _⟩,
have bm := perm.mem_of_perm (perm_merge _ _ _) bm,
simp at bm,
have ba : b ≼ a := (totr _ _).resolve_left h,
cases bm with be bm,
{ subst b', assumption },
cases bm with bl bl',
{ exact transr ba (h₁.right _ bl) },
{ exact h₂.right _ bl' } }
end
theorem sorted_merge_sort : ∀ l : list α, sorted r (merge_sort l)
| [] := sorted_nil _
| [a] := sorted_singleton _ _
| (a::b::l) := begin
ginduction split (a::b::l) with e l₁ l₂,
cases length_split_lt e with h₁ h₂,
rw [merge_sort_cons_cons r e],
exact sorted_merge r totr transr (sorted_merge_sort l₁) (sorted_merge_sort l₂)
end
using_well_founded {
rel_tac := λ_ _, `[exact ⟨_, inv_image.wf length nat.lt_wf⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption }
end total_and_transitive
end correctness
end merge_sort
end sort
/- try them out! -/
--#eval insertion_sort (λ m n : ℕ, m ≤ n) [5, 27, 221, 95, 17, 43, 7, 2, 98, 567, 23, 12]
--#eval merge_sort (λ m n : ℕ, m ≤ n) [5, 27, 221, 95, 17, 43, 7, 2, 98, 567, 23, 12]
end list
|
9d2e2ab5008f92291cfefcb81be783a7327bd5a0 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/list/cycle.lean | 259637ee19d6430a18f8ae5b21acf62a6b404248 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,987 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import data.multiset.sort
import data.fintype.list
import data.list.rotate
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `is_rotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representatble types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[1, 4, 3, 2]`. The representation of the cycle sorts the elements by the string value of the
underlying element. This representation also supports cycles that can contain duplicates.
-/
namespace list
variables {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def next_or : Π (xs : list α) (x default : α), α
| [] x default := default
| [y] x default := default -- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| (y :: z :: xs) x default := if x = y then z else next_or (z :: xs) x default
@[simp] lemma next_or_nil (x d : α) : next_or [] x d = d := rfl
@[simp] lemma next_or_singleton (x y d : α) : next_or [y] x d = d := rfl
@[simp] lemma next_or_self_cons_cons (xs : list α) (x y d : α) :
next_or (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
lemma next_or_cons_of_ne (xs : list α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
next_or (y :: xs) x d = next_or xs x d :=
begin
cases xs with z zs,
{ refl },
{ exact if_neg h }
end
/-- `next_or` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
lemma next_or_eq_next_or_of_mem_of_ne (xs : list α) (x d d' : α)
(x_mem : x ∈ xs) (x_ne : x ≠ xs.last (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) :
next_or xs x d = next_or xs x d' :=
begin
induction xs with y ys IH,
{ cases x_mem },
cases ys with z zs,
{ simp at x_mem x_ne, contradiction },
by_cases h : x = y,
{ rw [h, next_or_self_cons_cons, next_or_self_cons_cons] },
{ rw [next_or, next_or, IH];
simpa [h] using x_mem }
end
lemma mem_of_next_or_ne {xs : list α} {x d : α} (h : next_or xs x d ≠ d) :
x ∈ xs :=
begin
induction xs with y ys IH,
{ simpa using h },
cases ys with z zs,
{ simpa using h },
{ by_cases hx : x = y,
{ simp [hx] },
{ rw [next_or_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h,
simpa [hx] using IH h } }
end
lemma next_or_concat {xs : list α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) :
next_or (xs ++ [x]) x d = d :=
begin
induction xs with z zs IH,
{ simp },
{ obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or_distrib.mp (mt (mem_cons_iff _ _ _).mp h),
rw [cons_append, next_or_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs] }
end
lemma next_or_mem {xs : list α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) :
next_or xs x d ∈ xs :=
begin
revert hd,
suffices : ∀ (xs' : list α) (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') (hd : d ∈ xs'), next_or xs x d ∈ xs',
{ exact this xs (λ _, id) },
intros xs' hxs' hd,
induction xs with y ys ih,
{ exact hd },
cases ys with z zs,
{ exact hd },
rw next_or,
split_ifs with h,
{ exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) },
{ exact ih (λ _ h, hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)) },
end
/--
Given an element `x : α` of `l : list α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : list α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
next_or l x (l.nth_le 0 (length_pos_of_mem h))
/--
Given an element `x : α` of `l : list α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : Π (l : list α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l), α
| [] _ h := by simpa using h
| [y] _ _ := y
| (y :: z :: xs) x h := if hx : x = y then (last (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) else
if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
variables (l : list α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l)
@[simp] lemma next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) :
next [y] x h = y := rfl
@[simp] lemma prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) :
prev [y] x h = y := rfl
lemma next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: z :: l)) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z :=
by rw [next, next_or, if_pos hx]
@[simp] lemma next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ (x :: z :: l)) :
next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
lemma next_ne_head_ne_last (y : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: l)) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ last (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) :=
begin
rw [next, next, next_or_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, next_or_eq_next_or_of_mem_of_ne],
{ rwa last_cons at hx },
{ simpa [hy] using h }
end
lemma next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y :=
begin
rw [next, next_or_concat],
{ refl },
{ simp [hy, hx] }
end
lemma next_last_cons (y : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: l)) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = last (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : nodup l) :
next (y :: l) x h = y :=
begin
rw [next, nth_le, ←init_append_last (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, next_or_concat],
subst hx,
intro H,
obtain ⟨_ | k, hk, hk'⟩ := nth_le_of_mem H,
{ simpa [init_eq_take, nth_le_take', hy.symm] using hk' },
suffices : k.succ = l.length,
{ simpa [this] using hk },
cases l with hd tl,
{ simpa using hk },
{ rw nodup_iff_nth_le_inj at hl,
rw [length, nat.succ_inj'],
apply hl,
simpa [init_eq_take, nth_le_take', last_eq_nth_le] using hk' }
end
lemma prev_last_cons' (y : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: l)) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x h = last (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
begin
cases l;
simp [prev, hx]
end
@[simp] lemma prev_last_cons (h : x ∈ (x :: l)) :
prev (x :: l) x h = last (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_last_cons' l x x h rfl
lemma prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: z :: l)) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = last (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
@[simp] lemma prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ (x :: z :: l)) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = last (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
lemma prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: z :: l)) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp [prev, hy, hz] },
{ rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz] }
end
lemma prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: x :: l)) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
lemma prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ (y :: z :: l)) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) :=
begin
cases l,
{ simpa [hy, hz] using h },
{ rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz] }
end
include h
lemma next_mem : l.next x h ∈ l :=
next_or_mem (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma prev_mem : l.prev x h ∈ l :=
begin
cases l with hd tl,
{ simpa using h },
induction tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd,
{ simp },
{ by_cases hx : x = hd,
{ simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq],
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (last_mem _) },
{ rw [prev, dif_neg hx],
split_ifs with hm,
{ exact mem_cons_self _ _ },
{ exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _) } } }
end
lemma next_nth_le (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.length) :
next l (l.nth_le n hn) (nth_le_mem _ _ _) = l.nth_le ((n + 1) % l.length)
(nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ simpa using hn },
induction l with y l hl generalizing x n,
{ simp },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ have hn' : n.succ ≤ l.length.succ,
{ refine nat.succ_le_of_lt _,
simpa [nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] using hn },
have hx': (x :: y :: l).nth_le n.succ hn ≠ x,
{ intro H,
suffices : n.succ = 0,
{ simpa },
rw nodup_iff_nth_le_inj at h,
refine h _ _ hn nat.succ_pos' _,
simpa using H },
rcases hn'.eq_or_lt with hn''|hn'',
{ rw [next_last_cons],
{ simp [hn''] },
{ exact hx' },
{ simp [last_eq_nth_le, hn''] },
{ exact h.of_cons } },
{ have : n < l.length := by simpa [nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] using hn'' ,
rw [next_ne_head_ne_last _ _ _ _ hx'],
{ simp [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.succ_lt_succ (nat.succ_lt_succ this)),
hl _ _ h.of_cons, nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.succ_lt_succ this)] },
{ rw last_eq_nth_le,
intro H,
suffices : n.succ = l.length.succ,
{ exact absurd hn'' this.ge.not_lt },
rw nodup_iff_nth_le_inj at h,
refine h _ _ hn _ _,
{ simp },
{ simpa using H } } } } }
end
lemma prev_nth_le (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.length) :
prev l (l.nth_le n hn) (nth_le_mem _ _ _) = l.nth_le ((n + (l.length - 1)) % l.length)
(nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ simpa using hn },
induction l with y l hl generalizing n x,
{ simp },
{ rcases n with _|_|n,
{ simpa [last_eq_nth_le, nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.succ_lt_succ l.length.lt_succ_self)] },
{ simp only [mem_cons_iff, nodup_cons] at h,
push_neg at h,
simp [add_comm, prev_cons_cons_of_ne, h.left.left.symm] },
{ rw [prev_ne_cons_cons],
{ convert hl _ _ h.of_cons _ using 1,
have : ∀ k hk, (y :: l).nth_le k hk = (x :: y :: l).nth_le (k + 1) (nat.succ_lt_succ hk),
{ intros,
simpa },
rw [this],
congr,
simp only [nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length],
simp only [length, nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hn,
set k := l.length,
rw [nat.succ_add, ←nat.add_succ, nat.add_mod_right, nat.succ_add, ←nat.add_succ _ k,
nat.add_mod_right, nat.mod_eq_of_lt, nat.mod_eq_of_lt],
{ exact nat.lt_succ_of_lt hn },
{ exact nat.succ_lt_succ (nat.lt_succ_of_lt hn) } },
{ intro H,
suffices : n.succ.succ = 0,
{ simpa },
rw nodup_iff_nth_le_inj at h,
refine h _ _ hn nat.succ_pos' _,
simpa using H },
{ intro H,
suffices : n.succ.succ = 1,
{ simpa },
rw nodup_iff_nth_le_inj at h,
refine h _ _ hn (nat.succ_lt_succ nat.succ_pos') _,
simpa using H } } }
end
lemma pmap_next_eq_rotate_one (h : nodup l) :
l.pmap l.next (λ _ h, h) = l.rotate 1 :=
begin
apply list.ext_le,
{ simp },
{ intros,
rw [nth_le_pmap, nth_le_rotate, next_nth_le _ h] }
end
lemma pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one (h : nodup l) :
l.pmap l.prev (λ _ h, h) = l.rotate (l.length - 1) :=
begin
apply list.ext_le,
{ simp },
{ intros n hn hn',
rw [nth_le_rotate, nth_le_pmap, prev_nth_le _ h] }
end
lemma prev_next (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l (next l x hx) (next_mem _ _ _) = x :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
simp only [next_nth_le, prev_nth_le, h, nat.mod_add_mod],
cases l with hd tl,
{ simp },
{ have : n < 1 + tl.length := by simpa [add_comm] using hn,
simp [add_left_comm, add_comm, add_assoc, nat.mod_eq_of_lt this] }
end
lemma next_prev (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l (prev l x hx) (prev_mem _ _ _) = x :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
simp only [next_nth_le, prev_nth_le, h, nat.mod_add_mod],
cases l with hd tl,
{ simp },
{ have : n < 1 + tl.length := by simpa [add_comm] using hn,
simp [add_left_comm, add_comm, add_assoc, nat.mod_eq_of_lt this] }
end
lemma prev_reverse_eq_next (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = next l x hx :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
have lpos : 0 < l.length := k.zero_le.trans_lt hk,
have key : l.length - 1 - k < l.length :=
(nat.sub_le _ _).trans_lt (tsub_lt_self lpos nat.succ_pos'),
rw ←nth_le_pmap l.next (λ _ h, h) (by simpa using hk),
simp_rw [←nth_le_reverse l k (key.trans_le (by simp)), pmap_next_eq_rotate_one _ h],
rw ←nth_le_pmap l.reverse.prev (λ _ h, h),
{ simp_rw [pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one _ (nodup_reverse.mpr h), rotate_reverse,
length_reverse, nat.mod_eq_of_lt (tsub_lt_self lpos nat.succ_pos'),
tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (nat.succ_le_of_lt lpos)],
rw ←nth_le_reverse,
{ simp [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (nat.le_pred_of_lt hk)] },
{ simpa using (nat.sub_le _ _).trans_lt (tsub_lt_self lpos nat.succ_pos') } },
{ simpa using (nat.sub_le _ _).trans_lt (tsub_lt_self lpos nat.succ_pos') }
end
lemma next_reverse_eq_prev (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = prev l x hx :=
begin
convert (prev_reverse_eq_next l.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr h) x (mem_reverse.mpr hx)).symm,
exact (reverse_reverse l).symm
end
lemma is_rotated_next_eq {l l' : list α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.next x hx = l'.next x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := id h,
rw [next_nth_le _ hn],
simp_rw ←nth_le_rotate' _ n k,
rw [next_nth_le _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn), ←nth_le_rotate' _ n],
simp [add_assoc]
end
lemma is_rotated_prev_eq {l l' : list α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.prev x hx = l'.prev x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) :=
begin
rw [←next_reverse_eq_prev _ hn, ←next_reverse_eq_prev _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn)],
exact is_rotated_next_eq h.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr hn) _
end
end list
open list
/--
`cycle α` is the quotient of `list α` by cyclic permutation.
Duplicates are allowed.
-/
def cycle (α : Type*) : Type* := quotient (is_rotated.setoid α)
namespace cycle
variables {α : Type*}
instance : has_coe (list α) (cycle α) := ⟨quot.mk _⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (l₁ : cycle α) = l₂ ↔ (l₁ ~r l₂) :=
@quotient.eq _ (is_rotated.setoid _) _ _
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_coe (l : list α) : quot.mk _ l = (l : cycle α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mk'_eq_coe (l : list α) : quotient.mk' l = (l : cycle α) :=
rfl
lemma coe_cons_eq_coe_append (l : list α) (a : α) : (↑(a :: l) : cycle α) = ↑(l ++ [a]) :=
quot.sound ⟨1, by rw [rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero]⟩
/-- The unique empty cycle. -/
def nil : cycle α := ([] : list α)
@[simp] lemma coe_nil : ↑([] : list α) = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_eq_nil (l : list α) : (l : cycle α) = nil ↔ l = [] :=
coe_eq_coe.trans is_rotated_nil_iff
/-- For consistency with `list.has_emptyc`. -/
instance : has_emptyc (cycle α) := ⟨nil⟩
@[simp] lemma empty_eq : ∅ = @nil α :=
rfl
instance : inhabited (cycle α) := ⟨nil⟩
/-- An induction principle for `cycle`. Use as `induction s using cycle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma induction_on {C : cycle α → Prop} (s : cycle α) (H0 : C nil)
(HI : ∀ a (l : list α), C ↑l → C ↑(a :: l)) : C s :=
quotient.induction_on' s $ λ l, by { apply list.rec_on l; simp, assumption' }
/-- For `x : α`, `s : cycle α`, `x ∈ s` indicates that `x` occurs at least once in `s`. -/
def mem (a : α) (s : cycle α) : Prop :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, a ∈ l) (λ l₁ l₂ e, propext $ e.mem_iff)
instance : has_mem α (cycle α) := ⟨mem⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_coe_iff {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ (l : cycle α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma not_mem_nil : ∀ a, a ∉ @nil α :=
not_mem_nil
instance [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (cycle α) :=
λ s₁ s₂, quotient.rec_on_subsingleton₂' s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂, decidable_of_iff' _ quotient.eq')
instance [decidable_eq α] (x : α) (s : cycle α) : decidable (x ∈ s) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton' s (λ l, list.decidable_mem x l)
/-- Reverse a `s : cycle α` by reversing the underlying `list`. -/
def reverse (s : cycle α) : cycle α :=
quot.map reverse (λ l₁ l₂, is_rotated.reverse) s
@[simp] lemma reverse_coe (l : list α) : (l : cycle α).reverse = l.reverse :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_reverse_iff {a : α} {s : cycle α} : a ∈ s.reverse ↔ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s (λ _, mem_reverse)
@[simp] lemma reverse_reverse (s : cycle α) : s.reverse.reverse = s :=
quot.induction_on s (λ _, by simp)
@[simp] lemma reverse_nil : nil.reverse = @nil α :=
rfl
/-- The length of the `s : cycle α`, which is the number of elements, counting duplicates. -/
def length (s : cycle α) : ℕ :=
quot.lift_on s length (λ l₁ l₂ e, e.perm.length_eq)
@[simp] lemma length_coe (l : list α) : length (l : cycle α) = l.length :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma length_nil : length (@nil α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma length_reverse (s : cycle α) : s.reverse.length = s.length :=
quot.induction_on s length_reverse
/-- A `s : cycle α` that is at most one element. -/
def subsingleton (s : cycle α) : Prop :=
s.length ≤ 1
lemma subsingleton_nil : subsingleton (@nil α) :=
zero_le_one
lemma length_subsingleton_iff {s : cycle α} : subsingleton s ↔ length s ≤ 1 :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_reverse_iff {s : cycle α} : s.reverse.subsingleton ↔ s.subsingleton :=
by simp [length_subsingleton_iff]
lemma subsingleton.congr {s : cycle α} (h : subsingleton s) :
∀ ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ s), x = y :=
begin
induction s using quot.induction_on with l,
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe, le_iff_lt_or_eq, nat.lt_add_one_iff,
length_eq_zero, length_eq_one, nat.not_lt_zero, false_or] at h,
rcases h with rfl|⟨z, rfl⟩;
simp
end
/-- A `s : cycle α` that is made up of at least two unique elements. -/
def nontrivial (s : cycle α) : Prop := ∃ (x y : α) (h : x ≠ y), x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s
@[simp] lemma nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff {l : list α} (hl : l.nodup) :
nontrivial (l : cycle α) ↔ 2 ≤ l.length :=
begin
rw nontrivial,
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩),
{ simp },
{ simp },
{ simp only [mem_cons_iff, exists_prop, mem_coe_iff, list.length, ne.def, nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
zero_le, iff_true],
refine ⟨hd, hd', _, by simp⟩,
simp only [not_or_distrib, mem_cons_iff, nodup_cons] at hl,
exact hl.left.left }
end
@[simp] lemma nontrivial_reverse_iff {s : cycle α} : s.reverse.nontrivial ↔ s.nontrivial :=
by simp [nontrivial]
lemma length_nontrivial {s : cycle α} (h : nontrivial s) : 2 ≤ length s :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ := h,
induction s using quot.induction_on with l,
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩),
{ simpa using hx },
{ simp only [mem_coe_iff, mk_eq_coe, mem_singleton] at hx hy,
simpa [hx, hy] using hxy },
{ simp [bit0] }
end
/-- The `s : cycle α` contains no duplicates. -/
def nodup (s : cycle α) : Prop :=
quot.lift_on s nodup (λ l₁ l₂ e, propext $ e.nodup_iff)
@[simp] lemma nodup_nil : nodup (@nil α) :=
nodup_nil
@[simp] lemma nodup_coe_iff {l : list α} : nodup (l : cycle α) ↔ l.nodup :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma nodup_reverse_iff {s : cycle α} : s.reverse.nodup ↔ s.nodup :=
quot.induction_on s (λ _, nodup_reverse)
lemma subsingleton.nodup {s : cycle α} (h : subsingleton s) : nodup s :=
begin
induction s using quot.induction_on with l,
cases l with hd tl,
{ simp },
{ have : tl = [] := by simpa [subsingleton, length_eq_zero] using h,
simp [this] }
end
lemma nodup.nontrivial_iff {s : cycle α} (h : nodup s) : nontrivial s ↔ ¬ subsingleton s :=
begin
rw length_subsingleton_iff,
induction s using quotient.induction_on',
simp only [mk'_eq_coe, nodup_coe_iff] at h,
simp [h, nat.succ_le_iff]
end
/--
The `s : cycle α` as a `multiset α`.
-/
def to_multiset (s : cycle α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on' s coe (λ l₁ l₂ h, multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr h.perm)
@[simp] lemma coe_to_multiset (l : list α) : (l : cycle α).to_multiset = l :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma nil_to_multiset : nil.to_multiset = (0 : multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_to_multiset (s : cycle α) : s.to_multiset.card = s.length :=
quotient.induction_on' s (by simp)
@[simp] lemma to_multiset_eq_nil {s : cycle α} : s.to_multiset = 0 ↔ s = cycle.nil :=
quotient.induction_on' s (by simp)
/-- The lift of `list.map`. -/
def map {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : cycle α → cycle β :=
quotient.map' (list.map f) $ λ l₁ l₂ h, h.map _
@[simp] lemma map_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_coe {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f ↑l = list.map f l :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : cycle α) : map f s = nil ↔ s = nil :=
quotient.induction_on' s (by simp)
/-- The `multiset` of lists that can make the cycle. -/
def lists (s : cycle α) : multiset (list α) :=
quotient.lift_on' s
(λ l, (l.cyclic_permutations : multiset (list α))) $
λ l₁ l₂ h, by simpa using h.cyclic_permutations.perm
@[simp] lemma lists_coe (l : list α) : lists (l : cycle α) = ↑l.cyclic_permutations :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_lists_iff_coe_eq {s : cycle α} {l : list α} : l ∈ s.lists ↔ (l : cycle α) = s :=
quotient.induction_on' s $ λ l, by { rw [lists, quotient.lift_on'_mk'], simp }
@[simp] lemma lists_nil : lists (@nil α) = [([] : list α)] :=
by rw [nil, lists_coe, cyclic_permutations_nil]
section decidable
variable [decidable_eq α]
/--
Auxiliary decidability algorithm for lists that contain at least two unique elements.
-/
def decidable_nontrivial_coe : Π (l : list α), decidable (nontrivial (l : cycle α))
| [] := is_false (by simp [nontrivial])
| [x] := is_false (by simp [nontrivial])
| (x :: y :: l) := if h : x = y
then @decidable_of_iff' _ (nontrivial ((x :: l) : cycle α))
(by simp [h, nontrivial])
(decidable_nontrivial_coe (x :: l))
else is_true ⟨x, y, h, by simp, by simp⟩
instance {s : cycle α} : decidable (nontrivial s) :=
quot.rec_on_subsingleton s decidable_nontrivial_coe
instance {s : cycle α} : decidable (nodup s) :=
quot.rec_on_subsingleton s list.nodup_decidable
instance fintype_nodup_cycle [fintype α] : fintype {s : cycle α // s.nodup} :=
fintype.of_surjective (λ (l : {l : list α // l.nodup}), ⟨l.val, by simpa using l.prop⟩)
(λ ⟨s, hs⟩, by { induction s using quotient.induction_on', exact ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, by simp⟩ })
instance fintype_nodup_nontrivial_cycle [fintype α] :
fintype {s : cycle α // s.nodup ∧ s.nontrivial} :=
fintype.subtype (((finset.univ : finset {s : cycle α // s.nodup}).map
(function.embedding.subtype _)).filter cycle.nontrivial)
(by simp)
/-- The `s : cycle α` as a `finset α`. -/
def to_finset (s : cycle α) : finset α :=
s.to_multiset.to_finset
@[simp] theorem to_finset_to_multiset (s : cycle α) : s.to_multiset.to_finset = s.to_finset :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_finset (l : list α) : (l : cycle α).to_finset = l.to_finset :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma nil_to_finset : (@nil α).to_finset = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_finset_eq_nil {s : cycle α} : s.to_finset = ∅ ↔ s = cycle.nil :=
quotient.induction_on' s (by simp)
/-- Given a `s : cycle α` such that `nodup s`, retrieve the next element after `x ∈ s`. -/
def next : Π (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s), α :=
λ s, quot.hrec_on s (λ l hn x hx, next l x hx)
(λ l₁ l₂ h,
function.hfunext (propext h.nodup_iff) (λ h₁ h₂ he, function.hfunext rfl
(λ x y hxy, function.hfunext (propext (by simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using h.mem_iff))
(λ hm hm' he', heq_of_eq (by simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using is_rotated_next_eq h h₁ _)))))
/-- Given a `s : cycle α` such that `nodup s`, retrieve the previous element before `x ∈ s`. -/
def prev : Π (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s), α :=
λ s, quot.hrec_on s (λ l hn x hx, prev l x hx)
(λ l₁ l₂ h,
function.hfunext (propext h.nodup_iff) (λ h₁ h₂ he, function.hfunext rfl
(λ x y hxy, function.hfunext (propext (by simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using h.mem_iff))
(λ hm hm' he', heq_of_eq (by simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using is_rotated_prev_eq h h₁ _)))))
@[simp] lemma prev_reverse_eq_next (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.reverse.prev (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mpr hx) = s.next hs x hx :=
(quotient.induction_on' s prev_reverse_eq_next) hs x hx
@[simp] lemma next_reverse_eq_prev (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.reverse.next (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mpr hx) = s.prev hs x hx :=
by simp [←prev_reverse_eq_next]
@[simp] lemma next_mem (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.next hs x hx ∈ s :=
by { induction s using quot.induction_on, apply next_mem }
lemma prev_mem (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.prev hs x hx ∈ s :=
by { rw [←next_reverse_eq_prev, ←mem_reverse_iff], apply next_mem }
@[simp] lemma prev_next (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.prev hs (s.next hs x hx) (next_mem s hs x hx) = x :=
(quotient.induction_on' s prev_next) hs x hx
@[simp] lemma next_prev (s : cycle α) (hs : nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.next hs (s.prev hs x hx) (prev_mem s hs x hx) = x :=
(quotient.induction_on' s next_prev) hs x hx
end decidable
/--
We define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representatble types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[1, 4, 3, 2]`. The representation of the cycle sorts the elements by the string value of the
underlying element. This representation also supports cycles that can contain duplicates.
-/
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (cycle α) :=
⟨λ s, "c[" ++ string.intercalate ", " ((s.map repr).lists.sort (≤)).head ++ "]"⟩
/-- `chain R s` means that `R` holds between adjacent elements of `s`.
`chain R ([a, b, c] : cycle α) ↔ R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c a` -/
def chain (r : α → α → Prop) (c : cycle α) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on' c (λ l, match l with
| [] := true
| (a :: m) := chain r a (m ++ [a]) end) $
λ a b hab, propext $ begin
cases a with a l;
cases b with b m,
{ refl },
{ have := is_rotated_nil_iff'.1 hab,
contradiction },
{ have := is_rotated_nil_iff.1 hab,
contradiction },
{ unfold chain._match_1,
cases hab with n hn,
induction n with d hd generalizing a b l m,
{ simp only [rotate_zero] at hn,
rw [hn.1, hn.2] },
{ cases l with c s,
{ simp only [rotate_singleton] at hn,
rw [hn.1, hn.2] },
{ rw [nat.succ_eq_one_add, ←rotate_rotate, rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero, cons_append] at hn,
rw [←hd c _ _ _ hn],
simp [and.comm] } } }
end
@[simp] lemma chain.nil (r : α → α → Prop) : cycle.chain r (@nil α) :=
by trivial
@[simp] lemma chain_coe_cons (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
chain r (a :: l) ↔ list.chain r a (l ++ [a]) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma chain_singleton (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : chain r [a] ↔ r a a :=
by rw [chain_coe_cons, nil_append, chain_singleton]
lemma chain_ne_nil (r : α → α → Prop) {l : list α} :
Π hl : l ≠ [], chain r l ↔ list.chain r (last l hl) l :=
begin
apply l.reverse_rec_on,
exact λ hm, hm.irrefl.elim,
intros m a H _,
rw [←coe_cons_eq_coe_append, chain_coe_cons, last_append_singleton]
end
lemma chain_map {β : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} (f : β → α) {s : cycle β} :
chain r (s.map f) ↔ chain (λ a b, r (f a) (f b)) s :=
quotient.induction_on' s $ λ l, begin
cases l with a l,
refl,
convert list.chain_map f,
rw map_append f l [a],
refl
end
variables {r : α → α → Prop} {s : cycle α}
theorem chain_of_pairwise : (∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), r a b) → chain r s :=
begin
induction s using cycle.induction_on with a l _,
exact λ _, cycle.chain.nil r,
intro hs,
have Ha : a ∈ ((a :: l) : cycle α) := by simp,
have Hl : ∀ {b} (hb : b ∈ l), b ∈ ((a :: l) : cycle α) := λ b hb, by simp [hb],
rw cycle.chain_coe_cons,
apply pairwise.chain,
rw pairwise_cons,
refine ⟨λ b hb, _, pairwise_append.2 ⟨pairwise_of_forall_mem_list
(λ b hb c hc, hs b (Hl hb) c (Hl hc)), pairwise_singleton r a, λ b hb c hc, _⟩⟩,
{ rw mem_append at hb,
cases hb,
{ exact hs a Ha b (Hl hb) },
{ rw mem_singleton at hb,
rw hb,
exact hs a Ha a Ha } },
{ rw mem_singleton at hc,
rw hc,
exact hs b (Hl hb) a Ha }
end
theorem chain_iff_pairwise (hr : transitive r) : chain r s ↔ ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), r a b :=
⟨begin
induction s using cycle.induction_on with a l _,
exact λ _ b hb, hb.elim,
intros hs b hb c hc,
rw [cycle.chain_coe_cons, chain_iff_pairwise hr] at hs,
simp only [pairwise_append, pairwise_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, list.not_mem_nil,
forall_false_left, implies_true_iff, pairwise.nil, forall_eq, true_and] at hs,
simp only [mem_coe_iff, mem_cons_iff] at hb hc,
rcases hb with rfl | hb;
rcases hc with rfl | hc,
{ exact hs.1 c (or.inr rfl) },
{ exact hs.1 c (or.inl hc) },
{ exact hs.2.2 b hb },
{ exact hr (hs.2.2 b hb) (hs.1 c (or.inl hc)) }
end, cycle.chain_of_pairwise⟩
theorem forall_eq_of_chain (hr : transitive r) (hr' : anti_symmetric r)
(hs : chain r s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : a = b :=
by { rw chain_iff_pairwise hr at hs, exact hr' (hs a ha b hb) (hs b hb a ha) }
end cycle
|
15304ffed0c3705c0c6e5fef31b41997a1d95c55 | 43390109ab88557e6090f3245c47479c123ee500 | /src/M3P14/lemmas_for_prime_int.lean | 1d7f749ebb80f639e591d90712579e94640220ff | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Ja1941/xena-UROP-2018 | 41f0956519f94d56b8bf6834a8d39473f4923200 | b111fb87f343cf79eca3b886f99ee15c1dd9884b | refs/heads/master | 1,662,355,955,139 | 1,590,577,325,000 | 1,590,577,325,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,116 | lean | import data.int.basic
import data.int.modeq
import data.int.order
import algebra.group_power
import tactic.ring
import chris_hughes_various.zmod
open nat
--#check int.le
--theorem l_to_le {a b : ℤ} (hab : a < b) : a ≤ b := begin
--unfold has_le.le,
--unfold int.le,
--have h1 : b < b+1, by lt_succ_self b,
--end
definition prime_int (p : ℤ) := nat.prime(int.nat_abs p)
theorem prime_int_to_nat {p : ℤ} (h : prime_int p) : prime (int.nat_abs p) := sorry
definition quadratic_res (a n : ℤ) := ∃ x : ℤ, a ≡ x^2 [ZMOD (int.nat_abs n)]
--definition quadratic_res' (p : ℤ) (hp : prime_int_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) (a n : zmod p) := ∃ x : ℕ, a ≡ x^2 [ZMOD n]
attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
noncomputable definition legendre_sym {p : ℤ} (a : ℤ) (H1 : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) : ℤ :=
if quadratic_res a p ∧ ¬ ((p : ℤ) ∣ a) then 1 else
if ¬ quadratic_res a p then -1
else 0
-- lemmas
lemma legendre_strong_mul {p : ℤ} (a b : ℤ) (H1 : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) : legendre_sym (a*b) H1 = (legendre_sym a H1) * (legendre_sym b H1) := sorry
lemma if_cong_legendre_eq {p : ℤ} (a b : ℤ) (H1 : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) : a % p = b → legendre_sym a H1 = legendre_sym b H1 := sorry
lemma euler_criterion {p : ℤ} (a : ℤ) (H1 : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) : legendre_sym a H1 = a^(int.nat_abs p-1) % p := sorry
theorem legendre_sym_one_implies_quadratic_res {p : ℤ} (a : ℤ)(H1 : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2): legendre_sym a H1 = 1 → quadratic_res a p :=
begin
intro h,
unfold legendre_sym at h,
split_ifs at h,
exact h_1.1,
exfalso,
revert h, norm_num,
revert h, norm_num,
end
theorem minus_one_quad_res_of_p {p : ℤ} (hp : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) : (p ≡ 1 [ZMOD 4] ↔ (legendre_sym (-1: ℤ) hp) = 1) ∧ (p ≡ 3 [ZMOD 4] ↔ legendre_sym (-1 : ℤ) hp = (-1 : ℤ)) := sorry
definition is_sum_of_two_squares (n : ℕ) := ∃ x y : ℤ, (n : ℤ) = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2
theorem is_sum_of_two_squares_mul (m n : ℕ) : is_sum_of_two_squares m ∧ is_sum_of_two_squares n → is_sum_of_two_squares (m * n) :=
begin
intro h,
unfold is_sum_of_two_squares,
unfold is_sum_of_two_squares at h,
rcases h with ⟨⟨a, b, hab⟩, ⟨c, d, hcd⟩⟩,
existsi [a * c - b * d, a * d + b * c],
rw int.coe_nat_mul, rw hab, rw hcd,
ring,
end
theorem one_mod_four_prime (p : ℤ)(h : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) : p ^ 2 ≡ 1 [ZMOD 4] := sorry
theorem fermat_descent (p : ℤ)(h : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2) : ∃ a b r : ℤ, (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 = p * r) ∧ (1 < r) ∧ (r < p) → ∃ x y r' : ℤ, (1 ≤ r') ∧ (r'< r) ∧ (x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = p * r') :=
begin
sorry
end
theorem fermat_two_square (p : ℤ)(h : prime_int p ∧ p ≠ 2)(H: p ≥ 0) : p ≡ 1 [ZMOD 4] → is_sum_of_two_squares (int.nat_abs p) :=
begin
intro hpp,
have b1 := (minus_one_quad_res_of_p h).1.1,
have b2 := b1 hpp,
have b3 := legendre_sym_one_implies_quadratic_res (-1) h b2,
unfold quadratic_res at b3,
rcases b3 with x,
let y := x % ↑(int.nat_abs p),
have b3_hh : -1 ≡ y ^ 2 [ZMOD ↑(int.nat_abs p)],
begin
haveI : pos_nat p.nat_abs := sorry,
rw ← zmod.eq_iff_modeq_int,
rw ← zmod.eq_iff_modeq_int at b3_h,
have : x ≡ y [ZMOD ↑(p.nat_abs)],
exact (int.mod_mod x p.nat_abs).symm,
rw ← zmod.eq_iff_modeq_int at this,
rw int.cast_pow at b3_h,
rw int.cast_pow,
exact eq.subst this b3_h,
end,
have b4 : 1 ≡ 1 [ZMOD ↑(int.nat_abs p)], by refl,
have b5 := int.modeq.modeq_add b3_hh b4,
have b6 : (-1 :ℤ) + 1 = 0, by simp,
rw b6 at b5,
have b7 := int.modeq.symm b5,
rw int.nat_abs_of_nonneg at b7,
have b8:= int.modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 b7,
have b9 := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd b8,
rcases b9 with r,
have c5 : (int.nat_abs p : ℤ) ≠ 0, begin
by_contradiction,
simp at a,
have c6 := int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero a,
have c7 : 0 ≡ 1 [ZMOD 4], from eq.subst c6 hpp,
rw int.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd at c7,
revert c7,
simp,
norm_num,
end,
have c : (1 ≤ r) ∧ (r < p),
begin
split,
have c1 : 0 < y ^ 2 + 1,
{
rw int.lt_add_one_iff,
exact pow_two_nonneg y,
},
have c2 : p * r > 0, from eq.subst b9_h c1,
have c3 := pos_of_mul_pos_left c2 H, exact c3,
have c4 : y ≥ 0 ∧ y ≤ p - 1,
split,
have c8 : x % ↑(int.nat_abs p) ≥ 0, from int.mod_nonneg x c5,
exact c8,
rw ← int.lt_add_one_iff,
simp,
have d1 := int.mod_lt x c5,
conv at d1 {to_rhs, rw int.nat_abs_of_nonneg H},
rw abs_of_nonneg H at d1,
exact d1,
have d2 : y ^ 2 ≤ (p-1) ^ 2 , sorry,
have d3 : y ^ 2 + 1 ≤ (p-1) ^ 2 + 1, sorry,
have d4 : p * r ≤ (p-1) ^ 2 + 1, from eq.subst b9_h d3,
rw mul_comm at d4,
have d5 : p > 0, sorry,
have d6 := le_div_of_mul_le d5 d4,
sorry,
end,
sorry,
exact H,
end
#check abs
#check int.nat_abs_of_nonneg
--inductive less_than_or_equal (a : ℤ) : ℤ → Prop
--| refl : less_than_or_equal a
--| step : Π {b}, less_than_or_equal b → less_than_or_equal (succ b)
--def le_refl : ∀ a : ℤ, a ≤ a :=
--less_than_or_equal.refl
--lemma le_succ (n:ℤ) : n ≤ succ n :=
--less_than_or_equal.step (int.le_refl n)
--theorem le_of_succ_le {n m : ℤ} (h : succ n ≤ m) : n ≤ m :=
--int.le_trans (le_succ n) h |
799a6aa18bc827688a00a5522a093122b5d3864d | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/geometry/manifold/conformal_groupoid.lean | 6a75afe7a26f1bc4a8d88f21c8f45b5b3b12bfcc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,189 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yourong Zang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yourong Zang
-/
import analysis.calculus.conformal.normed_space
import geometry.manifold.charted_space
/-!
# Conformal Groupoid
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we define the groupoid of conformal maps on normed spaces.
## Main definitions
* `conformal_groupoid`: the groupoid of conformal local homeomorphisms.
## Tags
conformal, groupoid
-/
variables {X : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group X] [normed_space ℝ X]
/-- The pregroupoid of conformal maps. -/
def conformal_pregroupoid : pregroupoid X :=
{ property := λ f u, ∀ x, x ∈ u → conformal_at f x,
comp := λ f g u v hf hg hu hv huv x hx, (hg (f x) hx.2).comp x (hf x hx.1),
id_mem := λ x hx, conformal_at_id x,
locality := λ f u hu h x hx, let ⟨v, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h x hx in h₃ x ⟨hx, h₂⟩,
congr := λ f g u hu h hf x hx, (hf x hx).congr hx hu h, }
/-- The groupoid of conformal maps. -/
def conformal_groupoid : structure_groupoid X := conformal_pregroupoid.groupoid
|
eafd2941b2a72dd3a3ba498e7dd40c407e8d5d12 | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/algebra/lie/ideal_operations.lean | c557c562c3b76587b4b0b70fc22fbb3b18f5846d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,349 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import algebra.lie.submodule
/-!
# Ideal operations for Lie algebras
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, there is a natural action of the Lie ideals of `L`
on the Lie submodules of `M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, this
provides a pairing of Lie ideals which is especially important. For example, it can be used to
define solvability / nilpotency of a Lie algebra via the derived / lower-central series.
## Main definitions
* `lie_submodule.has_bracket`
* `lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span`
* `lie_ideal.map_bracket_le`
* `lie_ideal.comap_bracket_le`
## Notation
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, together with a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` and a Lie
ideal `I ⊆ L`, we introduce the notation `⁅I, N⁆` for the Lie submodule of `M` corresponding to
the action defined in this file.
## Tags
lie algebra, ideal operation
-/
universes u v w w₁ w₂
namespace lie_submodule
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type w₁}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
variables [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂] [lie_ring_module L M₂] [lie_module R L M₂]
variables (N N' : lie_submodule R L M) (I J : lie_ideal R L) (N₂ : lie_submodule R L M₂)
section lie_ideal_operations
/-- Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, the set of Lie ideals of `L` acts on the set
of submodules of `M`. -/
instance has_bracket : has_bracket (lie_ideal R L) (lie_submodule R L M) :=
⟨λ I N, lie_span R L { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m }⟩
lemma lie_ideal_oper_eq_span :
⁅I, N⁆ = lie_span R L { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m } := rfl
/-- See also `lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span'` and
`lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_tensor_map_range`. -/
lemma lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : submodule R M) = submodule.span R { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m } :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ let s := {m : M | ∃ (x : ↥I) (n : ↥N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m},
have aux : ∀ (y : L) (m' ∈ submodule.span R s), ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ submodule.span R s,
{ intros y m' hm', apply submodule.span_induction hm',
{ rintros m'' ⟨x, n, hm''⟩, rw [← hm'', leibniz_lie],
refine submodule.add_mem _ _ _; apply submodule.subset_span,
{ use [⟨⁅y, ↑x⁆, I.lie_mem x.property⟩, n], refl, },
{ use [x, ⟨⁅y, ↑n⁆, N.lie_mem n.property⟩], refl, }, },
{ simp only [lie_zero, submodule.zero_mem], },
{ intros m₁ m₂ hm₁ hm₂, rw lie_add, exact submodule.add_mem _ hm₁ hm₂, },
{ intros t m'' hm'', rw lie_smul, exact submodule.smul_mem _ t hm'', }, },
change _ ≤ ↑({ lie_mem := aux, ..submodule.span R s } : lie_submodule R L M),
rw [coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule, lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_span_le],
exact submodule.subset_span, },
{ rw lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, apply submodule_span_le_lie_span, },
end
lemma lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span' :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : submodule R M) = submodule.span R { m | ∃ (x ∈ I) (n ∈ N), ⁅x, n⁆ = m } :=
begin
rw lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span,
congr,
ext m,
split,
{ rintros ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩, },
{ rintros ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩, },
end
lemma lie_le_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ ∀ (x ∈ I) (m ∈ N), ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N' :=
begin
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_submodule.lie_span_le],
refine ⟨λ h x hx m hm, h ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, _⟩,
rintros h _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩,
exact h x hx m hm,
end
lemma lie_coe_mem_lie (x : I) (m : N) : ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ :=
by { rw lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, apply subset_lie_span, use [x, m], }
lemma lie_mem_lie {x : L} {m : M} (hx : x ∈ I) (hm : m ∈ N) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ :=
N.lie_coe_mem_lie I ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
lemma lie_comm : ⁅I, J⁆ = ⁅J, I⁆ :=
begin
suffices : ∀ (I J : lie_ideal R L), ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ ⁅J, I⁆, { exact le_antisymm (this I J) (this J I), },
clear I J, intros I J,
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_span_le], rintros x ⟨y, z, h⟩, rw ← h,
rw [← lie_skew, ← lie_neg, ← submodule.coe_neg],
apply lie_coe_mem_lie,
end
lemma lie_le_right : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N :=
begin
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_span_le], rintros m ⟨x, n, hn⟩, rw ← hn,
exact N.lie_mem n.property,
end
lemma lie_le_left : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I :=
by { rw lie_comm, exact lie_le_right I J, }
lemma lie_le_inf : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I ⊓ J :=
by { rw le_inf_iff, exact ⟨lie_le_left I J, lie_le_right J I⟩, }
@[simp] lemma lie_bot : ⁅I, (⊥ : lie_submodule R L M)⁆ = ⊥ :=
by { rw eq_bot_iff, apply lie_le_right, }
@[simp] lemma bot_lie : ⁅(⊥ : lie_ideal R L), N⁆ = ⊥ :=
begin
suffices : ⁅(⊥ : lie_ideal R L), N⁆ ≤ ⊥, { exact le_bot_iff.mp this, },
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_span_le], rintros m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, hn⟩, rw ← hn,
change x ∈ (⊥ : lie_ideal R L) at hx, rw mem_bot at hx, simp [hx],
end
lemma lie_eq_bot_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ = ⊥ ↔ ∀ (x ∈ I) (m ∈ N), ⁅(x : L), m⁆ = 0 :=
begin
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_submodule.lie_span_eq_bot_iff],
refine ⟨λ h x hx m hm, h ⁅x, m⁆ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, _⟩,
rintros h - ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩⟩,
exact h x hx n hn,
end
lemma mono_lie (h₁ : I ≤ J) (h₂ : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N'⁆ :=
begin
intros m h,
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, mem_lie_span] at h, rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, mem_lie_span],
intros N hN, apply h, rintros m' ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, hm⟩, rw ← hm, apply hN,
use [⟨x, h₁ hx⟩, ⟨n, h₂ hn⟩], refl,
end
lemma mono_lie_left (h : I ≤ J) : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N⁆ := mono_lie _ _ _ _ h (le_refl N)
lemma mono_lie_right (h : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N'⁆ := mono_lie _ _ _ _ (le_refl I) h
@[simp] lemma lie_sup : ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ :=
begin
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆,
{ rw sup_le_iff, split; apply mono_lie_right; [exact le_sup_left, exact le_sup_right], },
suffices : ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆, { exact le_antisymm this h, }, clear h,
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_span_le], rintros m ⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, h⟩, erw lie_submodule.mem_sup,
erw lie_submodule.mem_sup at hn, rcases hn with ⟨n₁, hn₁, n₂, hn₂, hn'⟩,
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : N)⁆, split, { apply lie_coe_mem_lie, },
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ : N')⁆, split, { apply lie_coe_mem_lie, },
simp [← h, ← hn'],
end
@[simp] lemma sup_lie : ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ :=
begin
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆,
{ rw sup_le_iff, split; apply mono_lie_left; [exact le_sup_left, exact le_sup_right], },
suffices : ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆, { exact le_antisymm this h, }, clear h,
rw [lie_ideal_oper_eq_span, lie_span_le], rintros m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, h⟩, erw lie_submodule.mem_sup,
erw lie_submodule.mem_sup at hx, rcases hx with ⟨x₁, hx₁, x₂, hx₂, hx'⟩,
use ⁅((⟨x₁, hx₁⟩ : I) : L), (n : N)⁆, split, { apply lie_coe_mem_lie, },
use ⁅((⟨x₂, hx₂⟩ : J) : L), (n : N)⁆, split, { apply lie_coe_mem_lie, },
simp [← h, ← hx'],
end
@[simp] lemma lie_inf : ⁅I, N ⊓ N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊓ ⁅I, N'⁆ :=
by { rw le_inf_iff, split; apply mono_lie_right; [exact inf_le_left, exact inf_le_right], }
@[simp] lemma inf_lie : ⁅I ⊓ J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊓ ⁅J, N⁆ :=
by { rw le_inf_iff, split; apply mono_lie_left; [exact inf_le_left, exact inf_le_right], }
variables (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂)
lemma map_bracket_eq : map f ⁅I, N⁆ = ⁅I, map f N⁆ :=
begin
rw [← coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, coe_submodule_map, lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span,
lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span, submodule.map_span],
congr,
ext m,
split,
{ rintros ⟨-, ⟨⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩, hm⟩⟩,
simp only [lie_module_hom.coe_to_linear_map, lie_module_hom.map_lie] at hm,
exact ⟨x, ⟨f n, (mem_map (f n)).mpr ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩⟩, hm⟩, },
{ rintros ⟨x, ⟨m₂, hm₂ : m₂ ∈ map f N⟩, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := (mem_map m₂).mp hm₂,
exact ⟨⁅x, n⁆, ⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩, by simp⟩, },
end
lemma map_comap_le : map f (comap f N₂) ≤ N₂ :=
(N₂ : set M₂).image_preimage_subset f
lemma map_comap_eq (hf : N₂ ≤ f.range) : map f (comap f N₂) = N₂ :=
begin
rw set_like.ext'_iff,
exact set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset hf,
end
lemma le_comap_map : N ≤ comap f (map f N) :=
(N : set M).subset_preimage_image f
lemma comap_map_eq (hf : f.ker = ⊥) : comap f (map f N) = N :=
begin
rw set_like.ext'_iff,
exact (N : set M).preimage_image_eq (f.ker_eq_bot.mp hf),
end
lemma comap_bracket_eq (hf₁ : f.ker = ⊥) (hf₂ : N₂ ≤ f.range) :
comap f ⁅I, N₂⁆ = ⁅I, comap f N₂⁆ :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw ← map_comap_eq N₂ f hf₂, },
rw [← map_bracket_eq, comap_map_eq _ f hf₁],
end
@[simp] lemma map_comap_incl : map N.incl (comap N.incl N') = N ⊓ N' :=
begin
rw ← coe_to_submodule_eq_iff,
exact (N : submodule R M).map_comap_subtype N',
end
end lie_ideal_operations
end lie_submodule
namespace lie_ideal
open lie_algebra
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {L' : Type w₂}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [lie_ring L'] [lie_algebra R L']
variables (f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L') (I : lie_ideal R L) (J : lie_ideal R L')
/-- Note that the inequality can be strict; e.g., the inclusion of an Abelian subalgebra of a
simple algebra. -/
lemma map_bracket_le {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} : map f ⁅I₁, I₂⁆ ≤ ⁅map f I₁, map f I₂⁆ :=
begin
rw map_le_iff_le_comap, erw lie_submodule.lie_span_le,
intros x hx, obtain ⟨⟨y₁, hy₁⟩, ⟨y₂, hy₂⟩, hx⟩ := hx, rw ← hx,
let fy₁ : ↥(map f I₁) := ⟨f y₁, mem_map hy₁⟩,
let fy₂ : ↥(map f I₂) := ⟨f y₂, mem_map hy₂⟩,
change _ ∈ comap f ⁅map f I₁, map f I₂⁆,
simp only [submodule.coe_mk, mem_comap, lie_hom.map_lie],
exact lie_submodule.lie_coe_mem_lie _ _ fy₁ fy₂,
end
lemma map_bracket_eq {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} (h : function.surjective f) :
map f ⁅I₁, I₂⁆ = ⁅map f I₁, map f I₂⁆ :=
begin
suffices : ⁅map f I₁, map f I₂⁆ ≤ map f ⁅I₁, I₂⁆, { exact le_antisymm (map_bracket_le f) this, },
rw [← lie_submodule.coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule, coe_map_of_surjective h,
lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span,
lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span, linear_map.map_span],
apply submodule.span_mono,
rintros x ⟨⟨z₁, h₁⟩, ⟨z₂, h₂⟩, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨y₁, rfl⟩ := mem_map_of_surjective h h₁,
obtain ⟨y₂, rfl⟩ := mem_map_of_surjective h h₂,
use [⁅(y₁ : L), (y₂ : L)⁆, y₁, y₂],
apply f.map_lie,
end
lemma comap_bracket_le {J₁ J₂ : lie_ideal R L'} : ⁅comap f J₁, comap f J₂⁆ ≤ comap f ⁅J₁, J₂⁆ :=
begin
rw ← map_le_iff_le_comap,
exact le_trans (map_bracket_le f) (lie_submodule.mono_lie _ _ _ _ map_comap_le map_comap_le),
end
variables {f}
lemma map_comap_incl {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} : map I₁.incl (comap I₁.incl I₂) = I₁ ⊓ I₂ :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ← I₁.incl_ideal_range, }, rw ← map_comap_eq, exact I₁.incl_is_ideal_morphism, }
lemma comap_bracket_eq {J₁ J₂ : lie_ideal R L'} (h : f.is_ideal_morphism) :
comap f ⁅f.ideal_range ⊓ J₁, f.ideal_range ⊓ J₂⁆ = ⁅comap f J₁, comap f J₂⁆ ⊔ f.ker :=
begin
rw [← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, comap_coe_submodule,
lie_submodule.sup_coe_to_submodule, f.ker_coe_submodule, ← submodule.comap_map_eq,
lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span, lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span,
linear_map.map_span],
congr, simp only [lie_hom.coe_to_linear_map, set.mem_set_of_eq], ext y,
split,
{ rintros ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩, hy⟩, rw ← hy,
erw [lie_submodule.mem_inf, f.mem_ideal_range_iff h] at hx₁ hx₂,
obtain ⟨⟨z₁, hz₁⟩, hz₁'⟩ := hx₁, rw ← hz₁ at hz₁',
obtain ⟨⟨z₂, hz₂⟩, hz₂'⟩ := hx₂, rw ← hz₂ at hz₂',
use [⁅z₁, z₂⁆, ⟨z₁, hz₁'⟩, ⟨z₂, hz₂'⟩, rfl],
simp only [hz₁, hz₂, submodule.coe_mk, lie_hom.map_lie], },
{ rintros ⟨x, ⟨⟨z₁, hz₁⟩, ⟨z₂, hz₂⟩, hx⟩, hy⟩, rw [← hy, ← hx],
have hz₁' : f z₁ ∈ f.ideal_range ⊓ J₁,
{ rw lie_submodule.mem_inf, exact ⟨f.mem_ideal_range, hz₁⟩, },
have hz₂' : f z₂ ∈ f.ideal_range ⊓ J₂,
{ rw lie_submodule.mem_inf, exact ⟨f.mem_ideal_range, hz₂⟩, },
use [⟨f z₁, hz₁'⟩, ⟨f z₂, hz₂'⟩], simp only [submodule.coe_mk, lie_hom.map_lie], },
end
lemma map_comap_bracket_eq {J₁ J₂ : lie_ideal R L'} (h : f.is_ideal_morphism) :
map f ⁅comap f J₁, comap f J₂⁆ = ⁅f.ideal_range ⊓ J₁, f.ideal_range ⊓ J₂⁆ :=
by { rw [← map_sup_ker_eq_map, ← comap_bracket_eq h, map_comap_eq h, inf_eq_right],
exact le_trans (lie_submodule.lie_le_left _ _) inf_le_left, }
lemma comap_bracket_incl {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} :
⁅comap I.incl I₁, comap I.incl I₂⁆ = comap I.incl ⁅I ⊓ I₁, I ⊓ I₂⁆ :=
begin
conv_rhs { congr, skip, rw ← I.incl_ideal_range, }, rw comap_bracket_eq,
simp only [ker_incl, sup_bot_eq], exact I.incl_is_ideal_morphism,
end
/-- This is a very useful result; it allows us to use the fact that inclusion distributes over the
Lie bracket operation on ideals, subject to the conditions shown. -/
lemma comap_bracket_incl_of_le {I₁ I₂ : lie_ideal R L} (h₁ : I₁ ≤ I) (h₂ : I₂ ≤ I) :
⁅comap I.incl I₁, comap I.incl I₂⁆ = comap I.incl ⁅I₁, I₂⁆ :=
by { rw comap_bracket_incl, rw ← inf_eq_right at h₁ h₂, rw [h₁, h₂], }
end lie_ideal
|
d0c0fa1059ccfeb5e7c199be0cbcec47eb16b4a7 | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/topology/sheaves/sheaf.lean | 4bff3f4fc034077ae4ec6bacfb99ab66b1d0164f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,522 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import topology.sheaves.sheaf_condition.equalizer_products
import category_theory.full_subcategory
/-!
# Sheaves
We define sheaves on a topological space, with values in an arbitrary category with products.
The sheaf condition for a `F : presheaf C X` requires that the morphism
`F.obj U ⟶ ∏ F.obj (U i)` (where `U` is some open set which is the union of the `U i`)
is the equalizer of the two morphisms
`∏ F.obj (U i) ⟶ ∏ F.obj (U i) ⊓ (U j)`.
We provide the instance `category (sheaf C X)` as the full subcategory of presheaves,
and the fully faithful functor `sheaf.forget : sheaf C X ⥤ presheaf C X`.
-/
universes v u
noncomputable theory
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
open topological_space
open opposite
open topological_space.opens
namespace Top
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [has_products C]
variables {X : Top.{v}} (F : presheaf C X) {ι : Type v} (U : ι → opens X)
namespace presheaf
open sheaf_condition_equalizer_products
/--
The sheaf condition for a `F : presheaf C X` requires that the morphism
`F.obj U ⟶ ∏ F.obj (U i)` (where `U` is some open set which is the union of the `U i`)
is the equalizer of the two morphisms
`∏ F.obj (U i) ⟶ ∏ F.obj (U i) ⊓ (U j)`.
-/
-- One might prefer to work with sets of opens, rather than indexed families,
-- which would reduce the universe level here to `max u v`.
-- However as it's a subsingleton the universe level doesn't matter much.
@[derive subsingleton]
def sheaf_condition (F : presheaf C X) : Type (max u (v+1)) :=
Π ⦃ι : Type v⦄ (U : ι → opens X), is_limit (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork F U)
/--
The presheaf valued in `punit` over any topological space is a sheaf.
-/
def sheaf_condition_punit (F : presheaf (category_theory.discrete punit) X) :
sheaf_condition F :=
λ ι U, punit_cone_is_limit
-- Let's construct a trivial example, to keep the inhabited linter happy.
instance sheaf_condition_inhabited (F : presheaf (category_theory.discrete punit) X) :
inhabited (sheaf_condition F) := ⟨sheaf_condition_punit F⟩
/--
Transfer the sheaf condition across an isomorphism of presheaves.
-/
def sheaf_condition_equiv_of_iso {F G : presheaf C X} (α : F ≅ G) :
sheaf_condition F ≃ sheaf_condition G :=
equiv_of_subsingleton_of_subsingleton
(λ c ι U, is_limit.of_iso_limit
((is_limit.postcompose_inv_equiv _ _).symm (c U)) (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork.iso_of_iso U α.symm).symm)
(λ c ι U, is_limit.of_iso_limit
((is_limit.postcompose_inv_equiv _ _).symm (c U)) (sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork.iso_of_iso U α).symm)
end presheaf
variables (C X)
/--
A `sheaf C X` is a presheaf of objects from `C` over a (bundled) topological space `X`,
satisfying the sheaf condition.
-/
structure sheaf :=
(presheaf : presheaf C X)
(sheaf_condition : presheaf.sheaf_condition)
instance : category (sheaf C X) := induced_category.category sheaf.presheaf
-- Let's construct a trivial example, to keep the inhabited linter happy.
instance sheaf_inhabited : inhabited (sheaf (category_theory.discrete punit) X) :=
⟨{ presheaf := functor.star _, sheaf_condition := default _ }⟩
namespace sheaf
/--
The forgetful functor from sheaves to presheaves.
-/
@[derive [full, faithful]]
def forget : Top.sheaf C X ⥤ Top.presheaf C X := induced_functor sheaf.presheaf
end sheaf
end Top
|
d7739fb7d219a306880a3806c8bf6d01e872af96 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/topology/continuous_function/stone_weierstrass.lean | 6ba08ff989c622510c7f324edf760b61a9e2aa4a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,958 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Heather Macbeth
-/
import topology.continuous_function.weierstrass
import analysis.complex.basic
/-!
# The Stone-Weierstrass theorem
If a subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, where `X` is a compact topological space,
separates points, then it is dense.
We argue as follows.
* In any subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, if `f ∈ A`, then `abs f ∈ A.topological_closure`.
This follows from the Weierstrass approximation theorem on `[-∥f∥, ∥f∥]` by
approximating `abs` uniformly thereon by polynomials.
* This ensures that `A.topological_closure` is actually a sublattice:
if it contains `f` and `g`, then it contains the pointwise supremum `f ⊔ g`
and the pointwise infimum `f ⊓ g`.
* Any nonempty sublattice `L` of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points is dense,
by a nice argument approximating a given `f` above and below using separating functions.
For each `x y : X`, we pick a function `g x y ∈ L` so `g x y x = f x` and `g x y y = f y`.
By continuity these functions remain close to `f` on small patches around `x` and `y`.
We use compactness to identify a certain finitely indexed infimum of finitely indexed supremums
which is then close to `f` everywhere, obtaining the desired approximation.
* Finally we put these pieces together. `L = A.topological_closure` is a nonempty sublattice
which separates points since `A` does, and so is dense (in fact equal to `⊤`).
We then prove the complex version for self-adjoint subalgebras `A`, by separately approximating
the real and imaginary parts using the real subalgebra of real-valued functions in `A`
(which still separates points, by taking the norm-square of a separating function).
## Future work
Extend to cover the case of subalgebras of the continuous functions vanishing at infinity,
on non-compact spaces.
-/
noncomputable theory
namespace continuous_map
variables {X : Type*} [topological_space X] [compact_space X]
/--
Turn a function `f : C(X, ℝ)` into a continuous map into `set.Icc (-∥f∥) (∥f∥)`,
thereby explicitly attaching bounds.
-/
def attach_bound (f : C(X, ℝ)) : C(X, set.Icc (-∥f∥) (∥f∥)) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨f x, ⟨neg_norm_le_apply f x, apply_le_norm f x⟩⟩ }
@[simp] lemma attach_bound_apply_coe (f : C(X, ℝ)) (x : X) : ((attach_bound f) x : ℝ) = f x := rfl
lemma polynomial_comp_attach_bound (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) (g : polynomial ℝ) :
(g.to_continuous_map_on (set.Icc (-∥f∥) ∥f∥)).comp (f : C(X, ℝ)).attach_bound =
polynomial.aeval f g :=
begin
ext,
simp only [continuous_map.coe_comp, function.comp_app,
continuous_map.attach_bound_apply_coe,
polynomial.to_continuous_map_on_apply,
polynomial.aeval_subalgebra_coe,
polynomial.aeval_continuous_map_apply,
polynomial.to_continuous_map_apply],
end
/--
Given a continuous function `f` in a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)`, postcomposing by a polynomial
gives another function in `A`.
This lemma proves something slightly more subtle than this:
we take `f`, and think of it as a function into the restricted target `set.Icc (-∥f∥) ∥f∥)`,
and then postcompose with a polynomial function on that interval.
This is in fact the same situation as above, and so also gives a function in `A`.
-/
lemma polynomial_comp_attach_bound_mem (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) (g : polynomial ℝ) :
(g.to_continuous_map_on (set.Icc (-∥f∥) ∥f∥)).comp (f : C(X, ℝ)).attach_bound ∈ A :=
begin
rw polynomial_comp_attach_bound,
apply set_like.coe_mem,
end
theorem comp_attach_bound_mem_closure
(A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) (p : C(set.Icc (-∥f∥) (∥f∥), ℝ)) :
p.comp (attach_bound f) ∈ A.topological_closure :=
begin
-- `p` itself is in the closure of polynomials, by the Weierstrass theorem,
have mem_closure : p ∈ (polynomial_functions (set.Icc (-∥f∥) (∥f∥))).topological_closure :=
continuous_map_mem_polynomial_functions_closure _ _ p,
-- and so there are polynomials arbitrarily close.
have frequently_mem_polynomials := mem_closure_iff_frequently.mp mem_closure,
-- To prove `p.comp (attached_bound f)` is in the closure of `A`,
-- we show there are elements of `A` arbitrarily close.
apply mem_closure_iff_frequently.mpr,
-- To show that, we pull back the polynomials close to `p`,
refine ((comp_right_continuous_map ℝ (attach_bound (f : C(X, ℝ)))).continuous_at p).tendsto
.frequently_map _ _ frequently_mem_polynomials,
-- but need to show that those pullbacks are actually in `A`.
rintros _ ⟨g, ⟨-,rfl⟩⟩,
simp only [set_like.mem_coe, alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom, comp_right_continuous_map_apply,
polynomial.to_continuous_map_on_alg_hom_apply],
apply polynomial_comp_attach_bound_mem,
end
theorem abs_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) :
(f : C(X, ℝ)).abs ∈ A.topological_closure :=
begin
let M := ∥f∥,
let f' := attach_bound (f : C(X, ℝ)),
let abs : C(set.Icc (-∥f∥) (∥f∥), ℝ) :=
{ to_fun := λ x : set.Icc (-∥f∥) (∥f∥), |(x : ℝ)| },
change (abs.comp f') ∈ A.topological_closure,
apply comp_attach_bound_mem_closure,
end
theorem inf_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f g : A) :
(f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊓ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A.topological_closure :=
begin
rw inf_eq,
refine A.topological_closure.smul_mem
(A.topological_closure.sub_mem
(A.topological_closure.add_mem (A.subalgebra_topological_closure f.property)
(A.subalgebra_topological_closure g.property)) _) _,
exact_mod_cast abs_mem_subalgebra_closure A _,
end
theorem inf_mem_closed_subalgebra (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (h : is_closed (A : set C(X, ℝ)))
(f g : A) : (f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊓ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A :=
begin
convert inf_mem_subalgebra_closure A f g,
apply set_like.ext',
symmetry,
erw closure_eq_iff_is_closed,
exact h,
end
theorem sup_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f g : A) :
(f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊔ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A.topological_closure :=
begin
rw sup_eq,
refine A.topological_closure.smul_mem
(A.topological_closure.add_mem
(A.topological_closure.add_mem (A.subalgebra_topological_closure f.property)
(A.subalgebra_topological_closure g.property)) _) _,
exact_mod_cast abs_mem_subalgebra_closure A _,
end
theorem sup_mem_closed_subalgebra (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (h : is_closed (A : set C(X, ℝ)))
(f g : A) : (f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊔ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A :=
begin
convert sup_mem_subalgebra_closure A f g,
apply set_like.ext',
symmetry,
erw closure_eq_iff_is_closed,
exact h,
end
open_locale topological_space
-- Here's the fun part of Stone-Weierstrass!
theorem sublattice_closure_eq_top
(L : set C(X, ℝ)) (nA : L.nonempty)
(inf_mem : ∀ f g ∈ L, f ⊓ g ∈ L) (sup_mem : ∀ f g ∈ L, f ⊔ g ∈ L)
(sep : L.separates_points_strongly) :
closure L = ⊤ :=
begin
-- We start by boiling down to a statement about close approximation.
apply eq_top_iff.mpr,
rintros f -,
refine filter.frequently.mem_closure
((filter.has_basis.frequently_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).mpr (λ ε pos, _)),
simp only [exists_prop, metric.mem_ball],
-- It will be helpful to assume `X` is nonempty later,
-- so we get that out of the way here.
by_cases nX : nonempty X,
swap,
exact ⟨nA.some, (dist_lt_iff pos).mpr (λ x, false.elim (nX ⟨x⟩)), nA.some_spec⟩,
/-
The strategy now is to pick a family of continuous functions `g x y` in `A`
with the property that `g x y x = f x` and `g x y y = f y`
(this is immediate from `h : separates_points_strongly`)
then use continuity to see that `g x y` is close to `f` near both `x` and `y`,
and finally using compactness to produce the desired function `h`
as a maximum over finitely many `x` of a minimum over finitely many `y` of the `g x y`.
-/
dsimp [set.separates_points_strongly] at sep,
let g : X → X → L := λ x y, (sep f x y).some,
have w₁ : ∀ x y, g x y x = f x := λ x y, (sep f x y).some_spec.1,
have w₂ : ∀ x y, g x y y = f y := λ x y, (sep f x y).some_spec.2,
-- For each `x y`, we define `U x y` to be `{z | f z - ε < g x y z}`,
-- and observe this is a neighbourhood of `y`.
let U : X → X → set X := λ x y, {z | f z - ε < g x y z},
have U_nhd_y : ∀ x y, U x y ∈ 𝓝 y,
{ intros x y,
refine is_open.mem_nhds _ _,
{ apply is_open_lt; continuity, },
{ rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, w₂],
exact sub_lt_self _ pos, }, },
-- Fixing `x` for a moment, we have a family of functions `λ y, g x y`
-- which on different patches (the `U x y`) are greater than `f z - ε`.
-- Taking the supremum of these functions
-- indexed by a finite collection of patches which cover `X`
-- will give us an element of `A` that is globally greater than `f z - ε`
-- and still equal to `f x` at `x`.
-- Since `X` is compact, for every `x` there is some finset `ys t`
-- so the union of the `U x y` for `y ∈ ys x` still covers everything.
let ys : Π x, finset X := λ x, (compact_space.elim_nhds_subcover (U x) (U_nhd_y x)).some,
let ys_w : ∀ x, (⋃ y ∈ ys x, U x y) = ⊤ :=
λ x, (compact_space.elim_nhds_subcover (U x) (U_nhd_y x)).some_spec,
have ys_nonempty : ∀ x, (ys x).nonempty :=
λ x, set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty _ _ nX (ys_w x),
-- Thus for each `x` we have the desired `h x : A` so `f z - ε < h x z` everywhere
-- and `h x x = f x`.
let h : Π x, L := λ x,
⟨(ys x).sup' (ys_nonempty x) (λ y, (g x y : C(X, ℝ))),
finset.sup'_mem _ sup_mem _ _ _ (λ y _, (g x y).2)⟩,
have lt_h : ∀ x z, f z - ε < h x z,
{ intros x z,
obtain ⟨y, ym, zm⟩ := set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top _ _ (ys_w x) z,
dsimp [h],
simp only [coe_fn_coe_base', subtype.coe_mk, sup'_coe, finset.sup'_apply, finset.lt_sup'_iff],
exact ⟨y, ym, zm⟩ },
have h_eq : ∀ x, h x x = f x,
{ intro x, simp only [coe_fn_coe_base'] at w₁, simp [coe_fn_coe_base', w₁], },
-- For each `x`, we define `W x` to be `{z | h x z < f z + ε}`,
let W : Π x, set X := λ x, {z | h x z < f z + ε},
-- This is still a neighbourhood of `x`.
have W_nhd : ∀ x, W x ∈ 𝓝 x,
{ intros x,
refine is_open.mem_nhds _ _,
{ apply is_open_lt; continuity, },
{ dsimp only [W, set.mem_set_of_eq],
rw h_eq,
exact lt_add_of_pos_right _ pos}, },
-- Since `X` is compact, there is some finset `ys t`
-- so the union of the `W x` for `x ∈ xs` still covers everything.
let xs : finset X := (compact_space.elim_nhds_subcover W W_nhd).some,
let xs_w : (⋃ x ∈ xs, W x) = ⊤ :=
(compact_space.elim_nhds_subcover W W_nhd).some_spec,
have xs_nonempty : xs.nonempty := set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty _ _ nX xs_w,
-- Finally our candidate function is the infimum over `x ∈ xs` of the `h x`.
-- This function is then globally less than `f z + ε`.
let k : (L : Type*) :=
⟨xs.inf' xs_nonempty (λ x, (h x : C(X, ℝ))),
finset.inf'_mem _ inf_mem _ _ _ (λ x _, (h x).2)⟩,
refine ⟨k.1, _, k.2⟩,
-- We just need to verify the bound, which we do pointwise.
rw dist_lt_iff pos,
intro z,
-- We rewrite into this particular form,
-- so that simp lemmas about inequalities involving `finset.inf'` can fire.
rw [(show ∀ a b ε : ℝ, dist a b < ε ↔ a < b + ε ∧ b - ε < a,
by { intros, simp only [← metric.mem_ball, real.ball_eq_Ioo, set.mem_Ioo, and_comm], })],
fsplit,
{ dsimp [k],
simp only [finset.inf'_lt_iff, continuous_map.inf'_apply],
exact set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top _ _ xs_w z, },
{ dsimp [k],
simp only [finset.lt_inf'_iff, continuous_map.inf'_apply],
intros x xm,
apply lt_h, },
end
/--
The **Stone-Weierstrass Approximation Theorem**,
that a subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, where `X` is a compact topological space,
is dense if it separates points.
-/
theorem subalgebra_topological_closure_eq_top_of_separates_points
(A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (w : A.separates_points) :
A.topological_closure = ⊤ :=
begin
-- The closure of `A` is closed under taking `sup` and `inf`,
-- and separates points strongly (since `A` does),
-- so we can apply `sublattice_closure_eq_top`.
apply set_like.ext',
let L := A.topological_closure,
have n : set.nonempty (L : set C(X, ℝ)) :=
⟨(1 : C(X, ℝ)), A.subalgebra_topological_closure A.one_mem⟩,
convert sublattice_closure_eq_top
(L : set C(X, ℝ)) n
(λ f fm g gm, inf_mem_closed_subalgebra L A.is_closed_topological_closure ⟨f, fm⟩ ⟨g, gm⟩)
(λ f fm g gm, sup_mem_closed_subalgebra L A.is_closed_topological_closure ⟨f, fm⟩ ⟨g, gm⟩)
(subalgebra.separates_points.strongly
(subalgebra.separates_points_monotone (A.subalgebra_topological_closure) w)),
{ simp, },
end
/--
An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is a uniform limit of elements of `A`.
-/
theorem continuous_map_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separates_points
(A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (w : A.separates_points)
(f : C(X, ℝ)) :
f ∈ A.topological_closure :=
begin
rw subalgebra_topological_closure_eq_top_of_separates_points A w,
simp,
end
/--
An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem,
for those who like their epsilons.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is within any `ε > 0` of some element of `A`.
-/
theorem exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuous_map_of_separates_points
(A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (w : A.separates_points)
(f : C(X, ℝ)) (ε : ℝ) (pos : 0 < ε) :
∃ (g : A), ∥(g : C(X, ℝ)) - f∥ < ε :=
begin
have w := mem_closure_iff_frequently.mp
(continuous_map_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separates_points A w f),
rw metric.nhds_basis_ball.frequently_iff at w,
obtain ⟨g, H, m⟩ := w ε pos,
rw [metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at H,
exact ⟨⟨g, m⟩, H⟩,
end
/--
An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem,
for those who like their epsilons and don't like bundled continuous functions.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is within any `ε > 0` of some element of `A`.
-/
theorem exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuous_of_separates_points
(A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (w : A.separates_points)
(f : X → ℝ) (c : continuous f) (ε : ℝ) (pos : 0 < ε) :
∃ (g : A), ∀ x, ∥g x - f x∥ < ε :=
begin
obtain ⟨g, b⟩ := exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuous_map_of_separates_points A w ⟨f, c⟩ ε pos,
use g,
rwa norm_lt_iff _ pos at b,
end
end continuous_map
section is_R_or_C
open is_R_or_C
-- Redefine `X`, since for the next few lemmas it need not be compact
variables {𝕜 : Type*} {X : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [topological_space X]
namespace continuous_map
/-- A real subalgebra of `C(X, 𝕜)` is `conj_invariant`, if it contains all its conjugates. -/
def conj_invariant_subalgebra (A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, 𝕜)) : Prop :=
A.map (conj_ae.to_alg_hom.comp_left_continuous ℝ conj_cle.continuous) ≤ A
lemma mem_conj_invariant_subalgebra {A : subalgebra ℝ C(X, 𝕜)} (hA : conj_invariant_subalgebra A)
{f : C(X, 𝕜)} (hf : f ∈ A) :
(conj_ae.to_alg_hom.comp_left_continuous ℝ conj_cle.continuous) f ∈ A :=
hA ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩
end continuous_map
open continuous_map
/-- If a conjugation-invariant subalgebra of `C(X, 𝕜)` separates points, then the real subalgebra
of its purely real-valued elements also separates points. -/
lemma subalgebra.separates_points.is_R_or_C_to_real {A : subalgebra 𝕜 C(X, 𝕜)}
(hA : A.separates_points) (hA' : conj_invariant_subalgebra (A.restrict_scalars ℝ)) :
((A.restrict_scalars ℝ).comap
(of_real_am.comp_left_continuous ℝ continuous_of_real)).separates_points :=
begin
intros x₁ x₂ hx,
-- Let `f` in the subalgebra `A` separate the points `x₁`, `x₂`
obtain ⟨_, ⟨f, hfA, rfl⟩, hf⟩ := hA hx,
let F : C(X, 𝕜) := f - const _ (f x₂),
-- Subtract the constant `f x₂` from `f`; this is still an element of the subalgebra
have hFA : F ∈ A,
{ refine A.sub_mem hfA _,
convert A.smul_mem A.one_mem (f x₂),
ext1,
simp },
-- Consider now the function `λ x, |f x - f x₂| ^ 2`
refine ⟨_, ⟨(⟨is_R_or_C.norm_sq, continuous_norm_sq⟩ : C(𝕜, ℝ)).comp F, _, rfl⟩, _⟩,
{ -- This is also an element of the subalgebra, and takes only real values
rw [set_like.mem_coe, subalgebra.mem_comap],
convert (A.restrict_scalars ℝ).mul_mem (mem_conj_invariant_subalgebra hA' hFA) hFA,
ext1,
rw [mul_comm],
exact (is_R_or_C.mul_conj _).symm },
{ -- And it also separates the points `x₁`, `x₂`
have : f x₁ - f x₂ ≠ 0 := sub_ne_zero.mpr hf,
simpa using this },
end
variables [compact_space X]
/--
The Stone-Weierstrass approximation theorem, `is_R_or_C` version,
that a subalgebra `A` of `C(X, 𝕜)`, where `X` is a compact topological space and `is_R_or_C 𝕜`,
is dense if it is conjugation-invariant and separates points.
-/
theorem continuous_map.subalgebra_is_R_or_C_topological_closure_eq_top_of_separates_points
(A : subalgebra 𝕜 C(X, 𝕜)) (hA : A.separates_points)
(hA' : conj_invariant_subalgebra (A.restrict_scalars ℝ)) :
A.topological_closure = ⊤ :=
begin
rw algebra.eq_top_iff,
-- Let `I` be the natural inclusion of `C(X, ℝ)` into `C(X, 𝕜)`
let I : C(X, ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] C(X, 𝕜) := of_real_clm.comp_left_continuous ℝ X,
-- The main point of the proof is that its range (i.e., every real-valued function) is contained
-- in the closure of `A`
have key : I.range ≤ (A.to_submodule.restrict_scalars ℝ).topological_closure,
{ -- Let `A₀` be the subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` consisting of `A`'s purely real elements; it is the
-- preimage of `A` under `I`. In this argument we only need its submodule structure.
let A₀ : submodule ℝ C(X, ℝ) := (A.to_submodule.restrict_scalars ℝ).comap I,
-- By `subalgebra.separates_points.complex_to_real`, this subalgebra also separates points, so
-- we may apply the real Stone-Weierstrass result to it.
have SW : A₀.topological_closure = ⊤,
{ have := subalgebra_topological_closure_eq_top_of_separates_points _
(hA.is_R_or_C_to_real hA'),
exact congr_arg subalgebra.to_submodule this },
rw [← submodule.map_top, ← SW],
-- So it suffices to prove that the image under `I` of the closure of `A₀` is contained in the
-- closure of `A`, which follows by abstract nonsense
have h₁ := A₀.topological_closure_map ((@of_real_clm 𝕜 _).comp_left_continuous_compact X),
have h₂ := (A.to_submodule.restrict_scalars ℝ).map_comap_le I,
exact h₁.trans (submodule.topological_closure_mono h₂) },
-- In particular, for a function `f` in `C(X, 𝕜)`, the real and imaginary parts of `f` are in the
-- closure of `A`
intros f,
let f_re : C(X, ℝ) := (⟨is_R_or_C.re, is_R_or_C.re_clm.continuous⟩ : C(𝕜, ℝ)).comp f,
let f_im : C(X, ℝ) := (⟨is_R_or_C.im, is_R_or_C.im_clm.continuous⟩ : C(𝕜, ℝ)).comp f,
have h_f_re : I f_re ∈ A.topological_closure := key ⟨f_re, rfl⟩,
have h_f_im : I f_im ∈ A.topological_closure := key ⟨f_im, rfl⟩,
-- So `f_re + I • f_im` is in the closure of `A`
convert A.topological_closure.add_mem h_f_re (A.topological_closure.smul_mem h_f_im is_R_or_C.I),
-- And this, of course, is just `f`
ext,
apply eq.symm,
simp [I, mul_comm is_R_or_C.I _],
end
end is_R_or_C
|
b281d7f41ef88577f857c774759ccb1d06e06829 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/st_options.lean | 3dcdee85bac2b9aff0b9239394a0cfaccae2560a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,594 | lean | set_option structure.eta_thm true
set_option structure.proj_mk_thm true
structure semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends has_mul A :=
(mul_assoc : ∀a b c, mul (mul a b) c = mul a (mul b c))
structure comm_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A :=
(mul_comm : ∀a b, mul a b = mul b a)
structure left_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A :=
(mul_left_cancel : ∀a b c, mul a b = mul a c → b = c)
structure right_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A :=
(mul_right_cancel : ∀a b c, mul a b = mul c b → a = c)
structure add_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends has_add A :=
(add_assoc : ∀a b c, add (add a b) c = add a (add b c))
structure add_comm_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A :=
(add_comm : ∀a b, add a b = add b a)
structure add_left_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A :=
(add_left_cancel : ∀a b c, add a b = add a c → b = c)
structure add_right_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A :=
(add_right_cancel : ∀a b c, add a b = add c b → a = c)
structure monoid [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A, has_one A :=
(one_mul : ∀a, mul one a = a) (mul_one : ∀a, mul a one = a)
structure comm_monoid [class] (A : Type) extends monoid A, comm_semigroup A
structure add_monoid [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A, has_zero A :=
(zero_add : ∀a, add zero a = a) (add_zero : ∀a, add a zero = a)
structure add_comm_monoid [class] (A : Type) extends add_monoid A, add_comm_semigroup A
structure group [class] (A : Type) extends monoid A, has_inv A :=
(mul_left_inv : ∀a, mul (inv a) a = one)
structure comm_group [class] (A : Type) extends group A, comm_monoid A
structure add_group [class] (A : Type) extends add_monoid A, has_neg A :=
(add_left_inv : ∀a, add (neg a) a = zero)
structure add_comm_group [class] (A : Type) extends add_group A, add_comm_monoid A
structure distrib [class] (A : Type) extends has_mul A, has_add A :=
(left_distrib : ∀a b c, mul a (add b c) = add (mul a b) (mul a c))
(right_distrib : ∀a b c, mul (add a b) c = add (mul a c) (mul b c))
structure mul_zero_class [class] (A : Type) extends has_mul A, has_zero A :=
(zero_mul : ∀a, mul zero a = zero)
(mul_zero : ∀a, mul a zero = zero)
structure zero_ne_one_class [class] (A : Type) extends has_zero A, has_one A :=
(zero_ne_one : zero ≠ one)
structure semiring [class] (A : Type) extends add_comm_monoid A, monoid A, distrib A,
mul_zero_class A, zero_ne_one_class A
set_option pp.implicit true
check @semiring.mul.mk
check @semiring.eta
|
014b3d1d08d3afd09657d50b173248f8b021b775 | ad0c7d243dc1bd563419e2767ed42fb323d7beea | /analysis/topology/compact_open.lean | 58f5a5fe1565cb6d26062c63406d0327d885f2f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sebzim4500/mathlib | e0b5a63b1655f910dee30badf09bd7e191d3cf30 | 6997cafbd3a7325af5cb318561768c316ceb7757 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,549,958,618 | 1,538,221,723,000 | 1,538,221,723,000 | 150,869,076 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,538,229,323,000 | 1,538,229,323,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,540 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton
-/
import analysis.topology.continuity tactic.tidy
open set
universes u v w
section locally_compact
-- There are various definitions of "locally compact space" in the
-- literature, which agree for Hausdorff spaces but not in general.
-- This one is the precise condition on X needed for the evaluation
-- map C(X, Y) × X → Y to be continuous for all Y when C(X, Y) is
-- given the compact-open topology.
class locally_compact_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] :=
(local_compact_nhds : ∀ (x : α) (n ∈ (nhds x).sets), ∃ s ∈ (nhds x).sets, s ⊆ n ∧ compact s)
variables {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
lemma locally_compact_of_compact_nhds [t2_space α]
(h : ∀ x : α, ∃ s, s ∈ (nhds x).sets ∧ compact s) :
locally_compact_space α :=
⟨assume x n hn,
let ⟨u, un, uo, xu⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hn in
let ⟨k, kx, kc⟩ := h x in
-- K is compact but not necessarily contained in N.
-- K \ U is again compact and doesn't contain x, so
-- we may find open sets V, W separating x from K \ U.
-- Then K \ W is a compact neighborhood of x contained in U.
let ⟨v, w, vo, wo, xv, kuw, vw⟩ :=
compact_compact_separated compact_singleton (compact_diff kc uo)
(by rw [singleton_inter_eq_empty]; exact λ h, h.2 xu) in
have wn : -w ∈ (nhds x).sets, from
mem_nhds_sets_iff.mpr
⟨v, subset_compl_iff_disjoint.mpr vw, vo, singleton_subset_iff.mp xv⟩,
⟨k - w,
filter.inter_mem_sets kx wn,
subset.trans (diff_subset_comm.mp kuw) un,
compact_diff kc wo⟩⟩
lemma locally_compact_of_compact [t2_space α] (h : compact (univ : set α)) :
locally_compact_space α :=
locally_compact_of_compact_nhds (assume x, ⟨univ, mem_nhds_sets is_open_univ trivial, h⟩)
end locally_compact
section compact_open
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
local notation `C(` α `, ` β `)` := subtype (continuous : set (α → β))
def compact_open_gen {s : set α} (hs : compact s) {u : set β} (hu : is_open u) : set C(α,β) :=
{f | f.val '' s ⊆ u}
-- The compact-open topology on the space of continuous maps α → β.
def compact_open : topological_space C(α, β) :=
topological_space.generate_from
{m | ∃ (s : set α) (hs : compact s) (u : set β) (hu : is_open u), m = compact_open_gen hs hu}
local attribute [instance] compact_open
private lemma is_open_gen {s : set α} (hs : compact s) {u : set β} (hu : is_open u) :
is_open (compact_open_gen hs hu) :=
topological_space.generate_open.basic _ (by dsimp [mem_set_of_eq]; tauto)
section functorial
variables {g : β → γ} (hg : continuous g)
def continuous_map.induced : C(α, β) → C(α, γ) :=
λ f, ⟨g ∘ f, f.property.comp hg⟩
private lemma preimage_gen {s : set α} (hs : compact s) {u : set γ} (hu : is_open u) :
continuous_map.induced hg ⁻¹' (compact_open_gen hs hu) = compact_open_gen hs (hg _ hu) :=
begin
ext ⟨f, _⟩,
change g ∘ f '' s ⊆ u ↔ f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' u,
rw [image_comp, image_subset_iff]
end
-- C(α, -) is a functor.
lemma continuous_induced : continuous (continuous_map.induced hg : C(α, β) → C(α, γ)) :=
continuous_generated_from $ assume m ⟨s, hs, u, hu, hm⟩,
by rw [hm, preimage_gen]; apply is_open_gen
end functorial
section ev
variables (α β)
def ev : C(α, β) × α → β := λ p, p.1.val p.2
variables {α β}
-- The evaluation map C(α, β) × α → β is continuous if α is locally compact.
lemma continuous_ev [locally_compact_space α] : continuous (ev α β) :=
continuous_iff_tendsto.mpr $ assume ⟨f, x⟩ n hn,
let ⟨v, vn, vo, fxv⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hn in
have v ∈ (nhds (f.val x)).sets, from mem_nhds_sets vo fxv,
let ⟨s, hs, sv, sc⟩ :=
locally_compact_space.local_compact_nhds x (f.val ⁻¹' v)
(f.property.tendsto x this) in
let ⟨u, us, uo, xu⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hs in
show (ev α β) ⁻¹' n ∈ (nhds (f, x)).sets, from
let w := set.prod (compact_open_gen sc vo) u in
have w ⊆ ev α β ⁻¹' n, from assume ⟨f', x'⟩ ⟨hf', hx'⟩, calc
f'.val x' ∈ f'.val '' s : mem_image_of_mem f'.val (us hx')
... ⊆ v : hf'
... ⊆ n : vn,
have is_open w, from is_open_prod (is_open_gen _ _) uo,
have (f, x) ∈ w, from ⟨image_subset_iff.mpr sv, xu⟩,
mem_nhds_sets_iff.mpr ⟨w, by assumption, by assumption, by assumption⟩
end ev
section coev
variables (α β)
def coev : β → C(α, β × α) :=
λ b, ⟨λ a, (b, a), continuous.prod_mk continuous_const continuous_id⟩
variables {α β}
lemma image_coev {y : β} (s : set α) : (coev α β y).val '' s = set.prod {y} s := by tidy
-- The coevaluation map β → C(α, β × α) is continuous (always).
lemma continuous_coev : continuous (coev α β) :=
continuous_generated_from $ begin
rintros _ ⟨s, sc, u, uo, rfl⟩,
rw is_open_iff_forall_mem_open,
intros y hy,
change (coev α β y).val '' s ⊆ u at hy,
rw image_coev s at hy,
rcases generalized_tube_lemma compact_singleton sc uo hy
with ⟨v, w, vo, wo, yv, sw, vwu⟩,
refine ⟨v, _, vo, singleton_subset_iff.mp yv⟩,
intros y' hy',
change (coev α β y').val '' s ⊆ u,
rw image_coev s,
exact subset.trans (prod_mono (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hy') sw) vwu
end
end coev
end compact_open
|
35750468aa9feb49b852f898528716359f372d68 | 38ee9024fb5974f555fb578fcf5a5a7b71e669b5 | /Mathlib.lean | c65d2459a6660e169cb460308fa3b3aaeada10a5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | denayd/mathlib4 | 750e0dcd106554640a1ac701e51517501a574715 | 7f40a5c514066801ab3c6d431e9f405baa9b9c58 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,743,991,894 | 1,636,618,048,000 | 1,636,618,048,000 | 373,926,241 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,782 | lean | import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Array.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ByteArray
import Mathlib.Data.Char
import Mathlib.Data.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Equiv.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Card
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Data.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.String.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.String.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Data.UInt
import Mathlib.Init.Algebra.Functions
import Mathlib.Init.Algebra.Order
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Init.Dvd
import Mathlib.Init.Function
import Mathlib.Init.Logic
import Mathlib.Init.Set
import Mathlib.Init.SetNotation
import Mathlib.Lean.LocalContext
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Mathport.Attributes
import Mathlib.Mathport.Rename
import Mathlib.Mathport.SpecialNames
import Mathlib.Mathport.Syntax
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cache
import Mathlib.Tactic.Coe
import Mathlib.Tactic.Core
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ext
import Mathlib.Tactic.Find
import Mathlib.Tactic.LibrarySearch
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoMatch
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.OpenPrivate
import Mathlib.Tactic.PrintPrefix
import Mathlib.Tactic.Rcases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.RunTac
import Mathlib.Tactic.ShowTerm
import Mathlib.Tactic.SolveByElim
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Tactic.SudoSetOption
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
import Mathlib.Util.Export
import Mathlib.Util.Time
|
3c9863c7b3043a5c92ba146bd8a394879611019b | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/topology/alexandroff.lean | fc0fae833aaa8c31a4afd1561a9f6fc85f4290ca | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,795 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yourong Zang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yourong Zang, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.fintype.option
import topology.separation
import topology.sets.opens
/-!
# The Alexandroff Compactification
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
We construct the Alexandroff compactification (the one-point compactification) of an arbitrary
topological space `X` and prove some properties inherited from `X`.
## Main definitions
* `alexandroff`: the Alexandroff compactification, we use coercion for the canonical embedding
`X → alexandroff X`; when `X` is already compact, the compactification adds an isolated point
to the space.
* `alexandroff.infty`: the extra point
## Main results
* The topological structure of `alexandroff X`
* The connectedness of `alexandroff X` for a noncompact, preconnected `X`
* `alexandroff X` is `T₀` for a T₀ space `X`
* `alexandroff X` is `T₁` for a T₁ space `X`
* `alexandroff X` is normal if `X` is a locally compact Hausdorff space
## Tags
one-point compactification, compactness
-/
open set filter
open_locale classical topology filter
/-!
### Definition and basic properties
In this section we define `alexandroff X` to be the disjoint union of `X` and `∞`, implemented as
`option X`. Then we restate some lemmas about `option X` for `alexandroff X`.
-/
variables {X : Type*}
/-- The Alexandroff extension of an arbitrary topological space `X` -/
def alexandroff (X : Type*) := option X
/-- The repr uses the notation from the `alexandroff` locale. -/
instance [has_repr X] : has_repr (alexandroff X) :=
⟨λ o, match o with | none := "∞" | (some a) := "↑" ++ repr a end⟩
namespace alexandroff
/-- The point at infinity -/
def infty : alexandroff X := none
localized "notation (name := alexandroff.infty) `∞` := alexandroff.infty" in alexandroff
instance : has_coe_t X (alexandroff X) := ⟨option.some⟩
instance : inhabited (alexandroff X) := ⟨∞⟩
instance [fintype X] : fintype (alexandroff X) := option.fintype
instance infinite [infinite X] : infinite (alexandroff X) := option.infinite
lemma coe_injective : function.injective (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
option.some_injective X
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_coe {x y : X} : (x : alexandroff X) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_infty (x : X) : (x : alexandroff X) ≠ ∞ .
@[simp] lemma infty_ne_coe (x : X) : ∞ ≠ (x : alexandroff X) .
/-- Recursor for `alexandroff` using the preferred forms `∞` and `↑x`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected def rec (C : alexandroff X → Sort*) (h₁ : C ∞) (h₂ : Π x : X, C x) :
Π (z : alexandroff X), C z :=
option.rec h₁ h₂
lemma is_compl_range_coe_infty : is_compl (range (coe : X → alexandroff X)) {∞} :=
is_compl_range_some_none X
@[simp] lemma range_coe_union_infty : (range (coe : X → alexandroff X) ∪ {∞}) = univ :=
range_some_union_none X
@[simp] lemma range_coe_inter_infty : (range (coe : X → alexandroff X) ∩ {∞}) = ∅ :=
range_some_inter_none X
@[simp] lemma compl_range_coe : (range (coe : X → alexandroff X))ᶜ = {∞} :=
compl_range_some X
lemma compl_infty : ({∞}ᶜ : set (alexandroff X)) = range (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
(@is_compl_range_coe_infty X).symm.compl_eq
lemma compl_image_coe (s : set X) : (coe '' s : set (alexandroff X))ᶜ = coe '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} :=
by rw [coe_injective.compl_image_eq, compl_range_coe]
lemma ne_infty_iff_exists {x : alexandroff X} :
x ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ (y : X), (y : alexandroff X) = x :=
by induction x using alexandroff.rec; simp
instance can_lift : can_lift (alexandroff X) X coe (λ x, x ≠ ∞) :=
with_top.can_lift
lemma not_mem_range_coe_iff {x : alexandroff X} :
x ∉ range (coe : X → alexandroff X) ↔ x = ∞ :=
by rw [← mem_compl_iff, compl_range_coe, mem_singleton_iff]
lemma infty_not_mem_range_coe : ∞ ∉ range (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
not_mem_range_coe_iff.2 rfl
lemma infty_not_mem_image_coe {s : set X} : ∞ ∉ (coe : X → alexandroff X) '' s :=
not_mem_subset (image_subset_range _ _) infty_not_mem_range_coe
@[simp] lemma coe_preimage_infty : (coe : X → alexandroff X) ⁻¹' {∞} = ∅ :=
by { ext, simp }
/-!
### Topological space structure on `alexandroff X`
We define a topological space structure on `alexandroff X` so that `s` is open if and only if
* `coe ⁻¹' s` is open in `X`;
* if `∞ ∈ s`, then `(coe ⁻¹' s)ᶜ` is compact.
Then we reformulate this definition in a few different ways, and prove that
`coe : X → alexandroff X` is an open embedding. If `X` is not a compact space, then we also prove
that `coe` has dense range, so it is a dense embedding.
-/
variables [topological_space X]
instance : topological_space (alexandroff X) :=
{ is_open := λ s, (∞ ∈ s → is_compact ((coe : X → alexandroff X) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ) ∧
is_open ((coe : X → alexandroff X) ⁻¹' s),
is_open_univ := by simp,
is_open_inter := λ s t,
begin
rintros ⟨hms, hs⟩ ⟨hmt, ht⟩,
refine ⟨_, hs.inter ht⟩,
rintros ⟨hms', hmt'⟩,
simpa [compl_inter] using (hms hms').union (hmt hmt')
end,
is_open_sUnion := λ S ho,
begin
suffices : is_open (coe ⁻¹' ⋃₀ S : set X),
{ refine ⟨_, this⟩,
rintro ⟨s, hsS : s ∈ S, hs : ∞ ∈ s⟩,
refine is_compact_of_is_closed_subset ((ho s hsS).1 hs) this.is_closed_compl _,
exact compl_subset_compl.mpr (preimage_mono $ subset_sUnion_of_mem hsS) },
rw [preimage_sUnion],
exact is_open_bUnion (λ s hs, (ho s hs).2)
end }
variables {s : set (alexandroff X)} {t : set X}
lemma is_open_def :
is_open s ↔ (∞ ∈ s → is_compact (coe ⁻¹' s : set X)ᶜ) ∧ is_open (coe ⁻¹' s : set X) :=
iff.rfl
lemma is_open_iff_of_mem' (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
is_open s ↔ is_compact (coe ⁻¹' s : set X)ᶜ ∧ is_open (coe ⁻¹' s : set X) :=
by simp [is_open_def, h]
lemma is_open_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
is_open s ↔ is_closed (coe ⁻¹' s : set X)ᶜ ∧ is_compact (coe ⁻¹' s : set X)ᶜ :=
by simp only [is_open_iff_of_mem' h, is_closed_compl_iff, and.comm]
lemma is_open_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) :
is_open s ↔ is_open (coe ⁻¹' s : set X) :=
by simp [is_open_def, h]
lemma is_closed_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
is_closed s ↔ is_closed (coe ⁻¹' s : set X) :=
have ∞ ∉ sᶜ, from λ H, H h,
by rw [← is_open_compl_iff, is_open_iff_of_not_mem this, ← is_open_compl_iff, preimage_compl]
lemma is_closed_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) :
is_closed s ↔ is_closed (coe ⁻¹' s : set X) ∧ is_compact (coe ⁻¹' s : set X) :=
by rw [← is_open_compl_iff, is_open_iff_of_mem (mem_compl h), ← preimage_compl, compl_compl]
@[simp] lemma is_open_image_coe {s : set X} :
is_open (coe '' s : set (alexandroff X)) ↔ is_open s :=
by rw [is_open_iff_of_not_mem infty_not_mem_image_coe, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
lemma is_open_compl_image_coe {s : set X} :
is_open (coe '' s : set (alexandroff X))ᶜ ↔ is_closed s ∧ is_compact s :=
begin
rw [is_open_iff_of_mem, ← preimage_compl, compl_compl, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective],
exact infty_not_mem_image_coe
end
@[simp] lemma is_closed_image_coe {s : set X} :
is_closed (coe '' s : set (alexandroff X)) ↔ is_closed s ∧ is_compact s :=
by rw [← is_open_compl_iff, is_open_compl_image_coe]
/-- An open set in `alexandroff X` constructed from a closed compact set in `X` -/
def opens_of_compl (s : set X) (h₁ : is_closed s) (h₂ : is_compact s) :
topological_space.opens (alexandroff X) :=
⟨(coe '' s)ᶜ, is_open_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
lemma infty_mem_opens_of_compl {s : set X} (h₁ : is_closed s) (h₂ : is_compact s) :
∞ ∈ opens_of_compl s h₁ h₂ :=
mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe
@[continuity] lemma continuous_coe : continuous (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
continuous_def.mpr (λ s hs, hs.right)
lemma is_open_map_coe : is_open_map (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
λ s, is_open_image_coe.2
lemma open_embedding_coe : open_embedding (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
open_embedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_coe coe_injective is_open_map_coe
lemma is_open_range_coe : is_open (range (coe : X → alexandroff X)) :=
open_embedding_coe.open_range
lemma is_closed_infty : is_closed ({∞} : set (alexandroff X)) :=
by { rw [← compl_range_coe, is_closed_compl_iff], exact is_open_range_coe }
lemma nhds_coe_eq (x : X) : 𝓝 ↑x = map (coe : X → alexandroff X) (𝓝 x) :=
(open_embedding_coe.map_nhds_eq x).symm
lemma nhds_within_coe_image (s : set X) (x : X) :
𝓝[coe '' s] (x : alexandroff X) = map coe (𝓝[s] x) :=
(open_embedding_coe.to_embedding.map_nhds_within_eq _ _).symm
lemma nhds_within_coe (s : set (alexandroff X)) (x : X) :
𝓝[s] ↑x = map coe (𝓝[coe ⁻¹' s] x) :=
(open_embedding_coe.map_nhds_within_preimage_eq _ _).symm
lemma comap_coe_nhds (x : X) : comap (coe : X → alexandroff X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x :=
(open_embedding_coe.to_inducing.nhds_eq_comap x).symm
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of `X`, then `x : alexandroff X` is not an isolated point
of `alexandroff X`. -/
instance nhds_within_compl_coe_ne_bot (x : X) [h : ne_bot (𝓝[≠] x)] :
ne_bot (𝓝[≠] (x : alexandroff X)) :=
by simpa [nhds_within_coe, preimage, coe_eq_coe] using h.map coe
lemma nhds_within_compl_infty_eq : 𝓝[≠] (∞ : alexandroff X) = map coe (coclosed_compact X) :=
begin
refine (nhds_within_basis_open ∞ _).ext (has_basis_coclosed_compact.map _) _ _,
{ rintro s ⟨hs, hso⟩,
refine ⟨_, (is_open_iff_of_mem hs).mp hso, _⟩,
simp },
{ rintro s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe, is_open_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩, _⟩,
simp [compl_image_coe, ← diff_eq, subset_preimage_image] }
end
/-- If `X` is a non-compact space, then `∞` is not an isolated point of `alexandroff X`. -/
instance nhds_within_compl_infty_ne_bot [noncompact_space X] :
ne_bot (𝓝[≠] (∞ : alexandroff X)) :=
by { rw nhds_within_compl_infty_eq, apply_instance }
@[priority 900]
instance nhds_within_compl_ne_bot [∀ x : X, ne_bot (𝓝[≠] x)] [noncompact_space X]
(x : alexandroff X) : ne_bot (𝓝[≠] x) :=
alexandroff.rec _ alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_infty_ne_bot
(λ y, alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_coe_ne_bot y) x
lemma nhds_infty_eq : 𝓝 (∞ : alexandroff X) = map coe (coclosed_compact X) ⊔ pure ∞ :=
by rw [← nhds_within_compl_infty_eq, nhds_within_compl_singleton_sup_pure]
lemma has_basis_nhds_infty :
(𝓝 (∞ : alexandroff X)).has_basis (λ s : set X, is_closed s ∧ is_compact s)
(λ s, coe '' sᶜ ∪ {∞}) :=
begin
rw nhds_infty_eq,
exact (has_basis_coclosed_compact.map _).sup_pure _
end
@[simp] lemma comap_coe_nhds_infty : comap (coe : X → alexandroff X) (𝓝 ∞) = coclosed_compact X :=
by simp [nhds_infty_eq, comap_sup, comap_map coe_injective]
lemma le_nhds_infty {f : filter (alexandroff X)} :
f ≤ 𝓝 ∞ ↔ ∀ s : set X, is_closed s → is_compact s → coe '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} ∈ f :=
by simp only [has_basis_nhds_infty.ge_iff, and_imp]
lemma ultrafilter_le_nhds_infty {f : ultrafilter (alexandroff X)} :
(f : filter (alexandroff X)) ≤ 𝓝 ∞ ↔ ∀ s : set X, is_closed s → is_compact s → coe '' s ∉ f :=
by simp only [le_nhds_infty, ← compl_image_coe, ultrafilter.mem_coe,
ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem]
lemma tendsto_nhds_infty' {α : Type*} {f : alexandroff X → α} {l : filter α} :
tendsto f (𝓝 ∞) l ↔ tendsto f (pure ∞) l ∧ tendsto (f ∘ coe) (coclosed_compact X) l :=
by simp [nhds_infty_eq, and_comm]
lemma tendsto_nhds_infty {α : Type*} {f : alexandroff X → α} {l : filter α} :
tendsto f (𝓝 ∞) l ↔
∀ s ∈ l, f ∞ ∈ s ∧ ∃ t : set X, is_closed t ∧ is_compact t ∧ maps_to (f ∘ coe) tᶜ s :=
tendsto_nhds_infty'.trans $ by simp only [tendsto_pure_left,
has_basis_coclosed_compact.tendsto_left_iff, forall_and_distrib, and_assoc, exists_prop]
lemma continuous_at_infty' {Y : Type*} [topological_space Y] {f : alexandroff X → Y} :
continuous_at f ∞ ↔ tendsto (f ∘ coe) (coclosed_compact X) (𝓝 (f ∞)) :=
tendsto_nhds_infty'.trans $ and_iff_right (tendsto_pure_nhds _ _)
lemma continuous_at_infty {Y : Type*} [topological_space Y] {f : alexandroff X → Y} :
continuous_at f ∞ ↔
∀ s ∈ 𝓝 (f ∞), ∃ t : set X, is_closed t ∧ is_compact t ∧ maps_to (f ∘ coe) tᶜ s :=
continuous_at_infty'.trans $
by simp only [has_basis_coclosed_compact.tendsto_left_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc]
lemma continuous_at_coe {Y : Type*} [topological_space Y] {f : alexandroff X → Y} {x : X} :
continuous_at f x ↔ continuous_at (f ∘ coe) x :=
by rw [continuous_at, nhds_coe_eq, tendsto_map'_iff, continuous_at]
/-- If `X` is not a compact space, then the natural embedding `X → alexandroff X` has dense range.
-/
lemma dense_range_coe [noncompact_space X] :
dense_range (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
begin
rw [dense_range, ← compl_infty],
exact dense_compl_singleton _
end
lemma dense_embedding_coe [noncompact_space X] :
dense_embedding (coe : X → alexandroff X) :=
{ dense := dense_range_coe, .. open_embedding_coe }
@[simp] lemma specializes_coe {x y : X} : (x : alexandroff X) ⤳ y ↔ x ⤳ y :=
open_embedding_coe.to_inducing.specializes_iff
@[simp] lemma inseparable_coe {x y : X} : inseparable (x : alexandroff X) y ↔ inseparable x y :=
open_embedding_coe.to_inducing.inseparable_iff
lemma not_specializes_infty_coe {x : X} : ¬specializes ∞ (x : alexandroff X) :=
is_closed_infty.not_specializes rfl (coe_ne_infty x)
lemma not_inseparable_infty_coe {x : X} : ¬inseparable ∞ (x : alexandroff X) :=
λ h, not_specializes_infty_coe h.specializes
lemma not_inseparable_coe_infty {x : X} : ¬inseparable (x : alexandroff X) ∞ :=
λ h, not_specializes_infty_coe h.specializes'
lemma inseparable_iff {x y : alexandroff X} :
inseparable x y ↔ x = ∞ ∧ y = ∞ ∨ ∃ x' : X, x = x' ∧ ∃ y' : X, y = y' ∧ inseparable x' y' :=
by induction x using alexandroff.rec; induction y using alexandroff.rec;
simp [not_inseparable_infty_coe, not_inseparable_coe_infty, coe_eq_coe]
/-!
### Compactness and separation properties
In this section we prove that `alexandroff X` is a compact space; it is a T₀ (resp., T₁) space if
the original space satisfies the same separation axiom. If the original space is a locally compact
Hausdorff space, then `alexandroff X` is a normal (hence, T₃ and Hausdorff) space.
Finally, if the original space `X` is *not* compact and is a preconnected space, then
`alexandroff X` is a connected space.
-/
/-- For any topological space `X`, its one point compactification is a compact space. -/
instance : compact_space (alexandroff X) :=
{ is_compact_univ :=
begin
have : tendsto (coe : X → alexandroff X) (cocompact X) (𝓝 ∞),
{ rw [nhds_infty_eq],
exact (tendsto_map.mono_left cocompact_le_coclosed_compact).mono_right le_sup_left },
convert ← this.is_compact_insert_range_of_cocompact continuous_coe,
exact insert_none_range_some X
end }
/-- The one point compactification of a `t0_space` space is a `t0_space`. -/
instance [t0_space X] : t0_space (alexandroff X) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x y hxy, _⟩,
rcases inseparable_iff.1 hxy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩|⟨x, rfl, y, rfl, h⟩,
exacts [rfl, congr_arg coe h.eq]
end
/-- The one point compactification of a `t1_space` space is a `t1_space`. -/
instance [t1_space X] : t1_space (alexandroff X) :=
{ t1 := λ z,
begin
induction z using alexandroff.rec,
{ exact is_closed_infty },
{ rw [← image_singleton, is_closed_image_coe],
exact ⟨is_closed_singleton, is_compact_singleton⟩ }
end }
/-- The one point compactification of a locally compact Hausdorff space is a normal (hence,
Hausdorff and regular) topological space. -/
instance [locally_compact_space X] [t2_space X] : normal_space (alexandroff X) :=
begin
have key : ∀ z : X,
∃ u v : set (alexandroff X), is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ ↑z ∈ u ∧ ∞ ∈ v ∧ disjoint u v,
{ intro z,
rcases exists_open_with_compact_closure z with ⟨u, hu, huy', Hu⟩,
exact ⟨coe '' u, (coe '' closure u)ᶜ, is_open_image_coe.2 hu,
is_open_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨is_closed_closure, Hu⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ huy',
mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe, (image_subset _ subset_closure).disjoint_compl_right⟩ },
refine @normal_of_compact_t2 _ _ _ ⟨λ x y hxy, _⟩,
induction x using alexandroff.rec; induction y using alexandroff.rec,
{ exact (hxy rfl).elim },
{ rcases key y with ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hxu, hyv, huv⟩,
exact ⟨v, u, hv, hu, hyv, hxu, huv.symm⟩ },
{ exact key x },
{ exact separated_by_open_embedding open_embedding_coe (mt coe_eq_coe.mpr hxy) }
end
/-- If `X` is not a compact space, then `alexandroff X` is a connected space. -/
instance [preconnected_space X] [noncompact_space X] : connected_space (alexandroff X) :=
{ to_preconnected_space := dense_embedding_coe.to_dense_inducing.preconnected_space,
to_nonempty := infer_instance }
/-- If `X` is an infinite type with discrete topology (e.g., `ℕ`), then the identity map from
`cofinite_topology (alexandroff X)` to `alexandroff X` is not continuous. -/
lemma not_continuous_cofinite_topology_of_symm [infinite X] [discrete_topology X] :
¬(continuous (@cofinite_topology.of (alexandroff X)).symm) :=
begin
inhabit X,
simp only [continuous_iff_continuous_at, continuous_at, not_forall],
use [cofinite_topology.of ↑(default : X)],
simpa [nhds_coe_eq, nhds_discrete, cofinite_topology.nhds_eq]
using (finite_singleton ((default : X) : alexandroff X)).infinite_compl
end
end alexandroff
/--
A concrete counterexample shows that `continuous.homeo_of_equiv_compact_to_t2`
cannot be generalized from `t2_space` to `t1_space`.
Let `α = alexandroff ℕ` be the one-point compactification of `ℕ`, and let `β` be the same space
`alexandroff ℕ` with the cofinite topology. Then `α` is compact, `β` is T1, and the identity map
`id : α → β` is a continuous equivalence that is not a homeomorphism.
-/
lemma continuous.homeo_of_equiv_compact_to_t2.t1_counterexample :
∃ (α β : Type) (Iα : topological_space α) (Iβ : topological_space β), by exactI
compact_space α ∧ t1_space β ∧ ∃ f : α ≃ β, continuous f ∧ ¬ continuous f.symm :=
⟨alexandroff ℕ, cofinite_topology (alexandroff ℕ), infer_instance, infer_instance,
infer_instance, infer_instance, cofinite_topology.of, cofinite_topology.continuous_of,
alexandroff.not_continuous_cofinite_topology_of_symm⟩
|
7137c3becabcfb2a092162ba47e9feef303d0448 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/linear_algebra/basis.lean | f5da0f90de12a8e11ce15b55368b4f51c1371006 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 54,253 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import algebra.big_operators.finsupp
import algebra.big_operators.finprod
import data.fintype.big_operators
import linear_algebra.finsupp
import linear_algebra.linear_independent
import linear_algebra.linear_pmap
import linear_algebra.projection
/-!
# Bases
This file defines bases in a module or vector space.
It is inspired by Isabelle/HOL's linear algebra, and hence indirectly by HOL Light.
## Main definitions
All definitions are given for families of vectors, i.e. `v : ι → M` where `M` is the module or
vector space and `ι : Type*` is an arbitrary indexing type.
* `basis ι R M` is the type of `ι`-indexed `R`-bases for a module `M`,
represented by a linear equiv `M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R`.
* the basis vectors of a basis `b : basis ι R M` are available as `b i`, where `i : ι`
* `basis.repr` is the isomorphism sending `x : M` to its coordinates `basis.repr x : ι →₀ R`.
The converse, turning this isomorphism into a basis, is called `basis.of_repr`.
* If `ι` is finite, there is a variant of `repr` called `basis.equiv_fun b : M ≃ₗ[R] ι → R`
(saving you from having to work with `finsupp`). The converse, turning this isomorphism into
a basis, is called `basis.of_equiv_fun`.
* `basis.constr hv f` constructs a linear map `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` given the values `f : ι → M₂` at the
basis elements `⇑b : ι → M₁`.
* `basis.reindex` uses an equiv to map a basis to a different indexing set.
* `basis.map` uses a linear equiv to map a basis to a different module.
## Main statements
* `basis.mk`: a linear independent set of vectors spanning the whole module determines a basis
* `basis.ext` states that two linear maps are equal if they coincide on a basis.
Similar results are available for linear equivs (if they coincide on the basis vectors),
elements (if their coordinates coincide) and the functions `b.repr` and `⇑b`.
* `basis.of_vector_space` states that every vector space has a basis.
## Implementation notes
We use families instead of sets because it allows us to say that two identical vectors are linearly
dependent. For bases, this is useful as well because we can easily derive ordered bases by using an
ordered index type `ι`.
## Tags
basis, bases
-/
noncomputable theory
universe u
open function set submodule
open_locale classical big_operators
variables {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {K : Type*}
variables {M : Type*} {M' M'' : Type*} {V : Type u} {V' : Type*}
section module
variables [semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [add_comm_monoid M'] [module R M']
section
variables (ι) (R) (M)
/-- A `basis ι R M` for a module `M` is the type of `ι`-indexed `R`-bases of `M`.
The basis vectors are available as `coe_fn (b : basis ι R M) : ι → M`.
To turn a linear independent family of vectors spanning `M` into a basis, use `basis.mk`.
They are internally represented as linear equivs `M ≃ₗ[R] (ι →₀ R)`,
available as `basis.repr`.
-/
structure basis := of_repr :: (repr : M ≃ₗ[R] (ι →₀ R))
end
namespace basis
instance : inhabited (basis ι R (ι →₀ R)) := ⟨basis.of_repr (linear_equiv.refl _ _)⟩
variables (b b₁ : basis ι R M) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M)
section repr
/-- `b i` is the `i`th basis vector. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (basis ι R M) (λ _, ι → M) :=
{ coe := λ b i, b.repr.symm (finsupp.single i 1) }
@[simp] lemma coe_of_repr (e : M ≃ₗ[R] (ι →₀ R)) :
⇑(of_repr e) = λ i, e.symm (finsupp.single i 1) :=
rfl
protected lemma injective [nontrivial R] : injective b :=
b.repr.symm.injective.comp (λ _ _, (finsupp.single_left_inj (one_ne_zero : (1 : R) ≠ 0)).mp)
lemma repr_symm_single_one : b.repr.symm (finsupp.single i 1) = b i := rfl
lemma repr_symm_single : b.repr.symm (finsupp.single i c) = c • b i :=
calc b.repr.symm (finsupp.single i c)
= b.repr.symm (c • finsupp.single i 1) : by rw [finsupp.smul_single', mul_one]
... = c • b i : by rw [linear_equiv.map_smul, repr_symm_single_one]
@[simp] lemma repr_self : b.repr (b i) = finsupp.single i 1 :=
linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _
lemma repr_self_apply (j) [decidable (i = j)] :
b.repr (b i) j = if i = j then 1 else 0 :=
by rw [repr_self, finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp] lemma repr_symm_apply (v) : b.repr.symm v = finsupp.total ι M R b v :=
calc b.repr.symm v = b.repr.symm (v.sum finsupp.single) : by simp
... = ∑ i in v.support, b.repr.symm (finsupp.single i (v i)) :
by rw [finsupp.sum, linear_equiv.map_sum]
... = finsupp.total ι M R b v :
by simp [repr_symm_single, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum]
@[simp] lemma coe_repr_symm : ↑b.repr.symm = finsupp.total ι M R b :=
linear_map.ext (λ v, b.repr_symm_apply v)
@[simp] lemma repr_total (v) : b.repr (finsupp.total _ _ _ b v) = v :=
by { rw ← b.coe_repr_symm, exact b.repr.apply_symm_apply v }
@[simp] lemma total_repr : finsupp.total _ _ _ b (b.repr x) = x :=
by { rw ← b.coe_repr_symm, exact b.repr.symm_apply_apply x }
lemma repr_range : (b.repr : M →ₗ[R] (ι →₀ R)).range = finsupp.supported R R univ :=
by rw [linear_equiv.range, finsupp.supported_univ]
lemma mem_span_repr_support {ι : Type*} (b : basis ι R M) (m : M) :
m ∈ span R (b '' (b.repr m).support) :=
(finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total _).2 ⟨b.repr m, (by simp [finsupp.mem_supported_support])⟩
lemma repr_support_subset_of_mem_span {ι : Type*}
(b : basis ι R M) (s : set ι) {m : M} (hm : m ∈ span R (b '' s)) : ↑(b.repr m).support ⊆ s :=
begin
rcases (finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total _).1 hm with ⟨l, hl, hlm⟩,
rwa [←hlm, repr_total, ←finsupp.mem_supported R l]
end
end repr
section coord
/-- `b.coord i` is the linear function giving the `i`'th coordinate of a vector
with respect to the basis `b`.
`b.coord i` is an element of the dual space. In particular, for
finite-dimensional spaces it is the `ι`th basis vector of the dual space.
-/
@[simps]
def coord : M →ₗ[R] R := (finsupp.lapply i) ∘ₗ ↑b.repr
lemma forall_coord_eq_zero_iff {x : M} :
(∀ i, b.coord i x = 0) ↔ x = 0 :=
iff.trans
(by simp only [b.coord_apply, finsupp.ext_iff, finsupp.zero_apply])
b.repr.map_eq_zero_iff
/-- The sum of the coordinates of an element `m : M` with respect to a basis. -/
noncomputable def sum_coords : M →ₗ[R] R :=
finsupp.lsum ℕ (λ i, linear_map.id) ∘ₗ (b.repr : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R)
@[simp] lemma coe_sum_coords : (b.sum_coords : M → R) = λ m, (b.repr m).sum (λ i, id) :=
rfl
lemma coe_sum_coords_eq_finsum : (b.sum_coords : M → R) = λ m, ∑ᶠ i, b.coord i m :=
begin
ext m,
simp only [basis.sum_coords, basis.coord, finsupp.lapply_apply, linear_map.id_coe,
linear_equiv.coe_coe, function.comp_app, finsupp.coe_lsum, linear_map.coe_comp,
finsum_eq_sum _ (b.repr m).finite_support, finsupp.sum, finset.finite_to_set_to_finset,
id.def, finsupp.fun_support_eq],
end
@[simp] lemma coe_sum_coords_of_fintype [fintype ι] : (b.sum_coords : M → R) = ∑ i, b.coord i :=
begin
ext m,
simp only [sum_coords, finsupp.sum_fintype, linear_map.id_coe, linear_equiv.coe_coe, coord_apply,
id.def, fintype.sum_apply, implies_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, finsupp.coe_lsum,
linear_map.coe_comp],
end
@[simp] lemma sum_coords_self_apply : b.sum_coords (b i) = 1 :=
by simp only [basis.sum_coords, linear_map.id_coe, linear_equiv.coe_coe, id.def, basis.repr_self,
function.comp_app, finsupp.coe_lsum, linear_map.coe_comp, finsupp.sum_single_index]
lemma dvd_coord_smul (i : ι) (m : M) (r : R) : r ∣ b.coord i (r • m) :=
⟨b.coord i m, by simp⟩
lemma coord_repr_symm (b : basis ι R M) (i : ι) (f : ι →₀ R) :
b.coord i (b.repr.symm f) = f i :=
by simp only [repr_symm_apply, coord_apply, repr_total]
end coord
section ext
variables {R₁ : Type*} [semiring R₁] {σ : R →+* R₁} {σ' : R₁ →+* R}
variables [ring_hom_inv_pair σ σ'] [ring_hom_inv_pair σ' σ]
variables {M₁ : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M₁] [module R₁ M₁]
/-- Two linear maps are equal if they are equal on basis vectors. -/
theorem ext {f₁ f₂ : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₁} (h : ∀ i, f₁ (b i) = f₂ (b i)) : f₁ = f₂ :=
by { ext x,
rw [← b.total_repr x, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum],
simp only [linear_map.map_sum, linear_map.map_smulₛₗ, h] }
include σ'
/-- Two linear equivs are equal if they are equal on basis vectors. -/
theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : M ≃ₛₗ[σ] M₁} (h : ∀ i, f₁ (b i) = f₂ (b i)) : f₁ = f₂ :=
by { ext x,
rw [← b.total_repr x, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum],
simp only [linear_equiv.map_sum, linear_equiv.map_smulₛₗ, h] }
omit σ'
/-- Two elements are equal if their coordinates are equal. -/
theorem ext_elem {x y : M}
(h : ∀ i, b.repr x i = b.repr y i) : x = y :=
by { rw [← b.total_repr x, ← b.total_repr y], congr' 1, ext i, exact h i }
lemma repr_eq_iff {b : basis ι R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R} :
↑b.repr = f ↔ ∀ i, f (b i) = finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨λ h i, h ▸ b.repr_self i,
λ h, b.ext (λ i, (b.repr_self i).trans (h i).symm)⟩
lemma repr_eq_iff' {b : basis ι R M} {f : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R} :
b.repr = f ↔ ∀ i, f (b i) = finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨λ h i, h ▸ b.repr_self i,
λ h, b.ext' (λ i, (b.repr_self i).trans (h i).symm)⟩
lemma apply_eq_iff {b : basis ι R M} {x : M} {i : ι} :
b i = x ↔ b.repr x = finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨λ h, h ▸ b.repr_self i,
λ h, b.repr.injective ((b.repr_self i).trans h.symm)⟩
/-- An unbundled version of `repr_eq_iff` -/
lemma repr_apply_eq (f : M → ι → R)
(hadd : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (hsmul : ∀ (c : R) (x : M), f (c • x) = c • f x)
(f_eq : ∀ i, f (b i) = finsupp.single i 1) (x : M) (i : ι) :
b.repr x i = f x i :=
begin
let f_i : M →ₗ[R] R :=
{ to_fun := λ x, f x i,
map_add' := λ _ _, by rw [hadd, pi.add_apply],
map_smul' := λ _ _, by { simp [hsmul, pi.smul_apply] } },
have : (finsupp.lapply i) ∘ₗ ↑b.repr = f_i,
{ refine b.ext (λ j, _),
show b.repr (b j) i = f (b j) i,
rw [b.repr_self, f_eq] },
calc b.repr x i = f_i x : by { rw ← this, refl }
... = f x i : rfl
end
/-- Two bases are equal if they assign the same coordinates. -/
lemma eq_of_repr_eq_repr {b₁ b₂ : basis ι R M} (h : ∀ x i, b₁.repr x i = b₂.repr x i) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
have b₁.repr = b₂.repr, by { ext, apply h },
by { cases b₁, cases b₂, simpa }
/-- Two bases are equal if their basis vectors are the same. -/
@[ext] lemma eq_of_apply_eq {b₁ b₂ : basis ι R M} (h : ∀ i, b₁ i = b₂ i) : b₁ = b₂ :=
suffices b₁.repr = b₂.repr, by { cases b₁, cases b₂, simpa },
repr_eq_iff'.mpr (λ i, by rw [h, b₂.repr_self])
end ext
section map
variables (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M')
/-- Apply the linear equivalence `f` to the basis vectors. -/
@[simps] protected def map : basis ι R M' :=
of_repr (f.symm.trans b.repr)
@[simp] lemma map_apply (i) : b.map f i = f (b i) := rfl
end map
section map_coeffs
variables {R' : Type*} [semiring R'] [module R' M] (f : R ≃+* R') (h : ∀ c (x : M), f c • x = c • x)
include f h b
local attribute [instance] has_smul.comp.is_scalar_tower
/-- If `R` and `R'` are isomorphic rings that act identically on a module `M`,
then a basis for `M` as `R`-module is also a basis for `M` as `R'`-module.
See also `basis.algebra_map_coeffs` for the case where `f` is equal to `algebra_map`.
-/
@[simps {simp_rhs := tt}]
def map_coeffs : basis ι R' M :=
begin
letI : module R' R := module.comp_hom R (↑f.symm : R' →+* R),
haveI : is_scalar_tower R' R M :=
{ smul_assoc := λ x y z, begin dsimp [(•)], rw [mul_smul, ←h, f.apply_symm_apply], end },
exact (of_repr $ (b.repr.restrict_scalars R').trans $
finsupp.map_range.linear_equiv (module.comp_hom.to_linear_equiv f.symm).symm )
end
lemma map_coeffs_apply (i : ι) : b.map_coeffs f h i = b i :=
apply_eq_iff.mpr $ by simp [f.to_add_equiv_eq_coe]
@[simp] lemma coe_map_coeffs : (b.map_coeffs f h : ι → M) = b :=
funext $ b.map_coeffs_apply f h
end map_coeffs
section reindex
variables (b' : basis ι' R M')
variables (e : ι ≃ ι')
/-- `b.reindex (e : ι ≃ ι')` is a basis indexed by `ι'` -/
def reindex : basis ι' R M :=
basis.of_repr (b.repr.trans (finsupp.dom_lcongr e))
lemma reindex_apply (i' : ι') : b.reindex e i' = b (e.symm i') :=
show (b.repr.trans (finsupp.dom_lcongr e)).symm (finsupp.single i' 1) =
b.repr.symm (finsupp.single (e.symm i') 1),
by rw [linear_equiv.symm_trans_apply, finsupp.dom_lcongr_symm, finsupp.dom_lcongr_single]
@[simp] lemma coe_reindex : (b.reindex e : ι' → M) = b ∘ e.symm :=
funext (b.reindex_apply e)
@[simp] lemma coe_reindex_repr : ((b.reindex e).repr x : ι' → R) = b.repr x ∘ e.symm :=
funext $ λ i',
show (finsupp.dom_lcongr e : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) (b.repr x) i' = _,
by simp
@[simp] lemma reindex_repr (i' : ι') : (b.reindex e).repr x i' = b.repr x (e.symm i') :=
by rw coe_reindex_repr
@[simp] lemma reindex_refl : b.reindex (equiv.refl ι) = b :=
eq_of_apply_eq $ λ i, by simp
/-- `simp` normal form version of `range_reindex` -/
@[simp] lemma range_reindex' : set.range (b ∘ e.symm) = set.range b :=
by rw [range_comp, equiv.range_eq_univ, set.image_univ]
lemma range_reindex : set.range (b.reindex e) = set.range b :=
by rw [coe_reindex, range_reindex']
/-- `b.reindex_range` is a basis indexed by `range b`, the basis vectors themselves. -/
def reindex_range : basis (range b) R M :=
if h : nontrivial R then
by letI := h; exact b.reindex (equiv.of_injective b (basis.injective b))
else
by letI : subsingleton R := not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp h; exact
basis.of_repr (module.subsingleton_equiv R M (range b))
lemma reindex_range_self (i : ι) (h := set.mem_range_self i) :
b.reindex_range ⟨b i, h⟩ = b i :=
begin
by_cases htr : nontrivial R,
{ letI := htr,
simp [htr, reindex_range, reindex_apply, equiv.apply_of_injective_symm b.injective,
subtype.coe_mk] },
{ letI : subsingleton R := not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp htr,
letI := module.subsingleton R M,
simp [reindex_range] }
end
lemma reindex_range_repr_self (i : ι) :
b.reindex_range.repr (b i) = finsupp.single ⟨b i, mem_range_self i⟩ 1 :=
calc b.reindex_range.repr (b i) = b.reindex_range.repr (b.reindex_range ⟨b i, mem_range_self i⟩) :
congr_arg _ (b.reindex_range_self _ _).symm
... = finsupp.single ⟨b i, mem_range_self i⟩ 1 : b.reindex_range.repr_self _
@[simp] lemma reindex_range_apply (x : range b) : b.reindex_range x = x :=
by { rcases x with ⟨bi, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, exact b.reindex_range_self i, }
lemma reindex_range_repr' (x : M) {bi : M} {i : ι} (h : b i = bi) :
b.reindex_range.repr x ⟨bi, ⟨i, h⟩⟩ = b.repr x i :=
begin
nontriviality,
subst h,
refine (b.repr_apply_eq (λ x i, b.reindex_range.repr x ⟨b i, _⟩) _ _ _ x i).symm,
{ intros x y,
ext i,
simp only [pi.add_apply, linear_equiv.map_add, finsupp.coe_add] },
{ intros c x,
ext i,
simp only [pi.smul_apply, linear_equiv.map_smul, finsupp.coe_smul] },
{ intros i,
ext j,
simp only [reindex_range_repr_self],
refine @finsupp.single_apply_left _ _ _ _ (λ i, (⟨b i, _⟩ : set.range b)) _ _ _ _,
exact λ i j h, b.injective (subtype.mk.inj h) }
end
@[simp] lemma reindex_range_repr (x : M) (i : ι) (h := set.mem_range_self i) :
b.reindex_range.repr x ⟨b i, h⟩ = b.repr x i :=
b.reindex_range_repr' _ rfl
section fintype
variables [fintype ι]
/-- `b.reindex_finset_range` is a basis indexed by `finset.univ.image b`,
the finite set of basis vectors themselves. -/
def reindex_finset_range : basis (finset.univ.image b) R M :=
b.reindex_range.reindex ((equiv.refl M).subtype_equiv (by simp))
lemma reindex_finset_range_self (i : ι) (h := finset.mem_image_of_mem b (finset.mem_univ i)) :
b.reindex_finset_range ⟨b i, h⟩ = b i :=
by { rw [reindex_finset_range, reindex_apply, reindex_range_apply], refl }
@[simp] lemma reindex_finset_range_apply (x : finset.univ.image b) :
b.reindex_finset_range x = x :=
by { rcases x with ⟨bi, hbi⟩, rcases finset.mem_image.mp hbi with ⟨i, -, rfl⟩,
exact b.reindex_finset_range_self i }
lemma reindex_finset_range_repr_self (i : ι) :
b.reindex_finset_range.repr (b i) =
finsupp.single ⟨b i, finset.mem_image_of_mem b (finset.mem_univ i)⟩ 1 :=
begin
ext ⟨bi, hbi⟩,
rw [reindex_finset_range, reindex_repr, reindex_range_repr_self],
convert finsupp.single_apply_left ((equiv.refl M).subtype_equiv _).symm.injective _ _ _,
refl
end
@[simp] lemma reindex_finset_range_repr (x : M) (i : ι)
(h := finset.mem_image_of_mem b (finset.mem_univ i)) :
b.reindex_finset_range.repr x ⟨b i, h⟩ = b.repr x i :=
by simp [reindex_finset_range]
end fintype
end reindex
protected lemma linear_independent : linear_independent R b :=
linear_independent_iff.mpr $ λ l hl,
calc l = b.repr (finsupp.total _ _ _ b l) : (b.repr_total l).symm
... = 0 : by rw [hl, linear_equiv.map_zero]
protected lemma ne_zero [nontrivial R] (i) : b i ≠ 0 :=
b.linear_independent.ne_zero i
protected lemma mem_span (x : M) : x ∈ span R (range b) :=
by { rw [← b.total_repr x, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum],
exact submodule.sum_mem _ (λ i hi, submodule.smul_mem _ _ (submodule.subset_span ⟨i, rfl⟩)) }
protected lemma span_eq : span R (range b) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr $ λ x _, b.mem_span x
lemma index_nonempty (b : basis ι R M) [nontrivial M] : nonempty ι :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, y, ne⟩ : ∃ (x y : M), x ≠ y := nontrivial.exists_pair_ne,
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ := not_forall.mp (mt b.ext_elem ne),
exact ⟨i⟩
end
/-- If the submodule `P` has a basis, `x ∈ P` iff it is a linear combination of basis vectors. -/
lemma mem_submodule_iff {P : submodule R M} (b : basis ι R P) {x : M} :
x ∈ P ↔ ∃ (c : ι →₀ R), x = finsupp.sum c (λ i x, x • b i) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [← P.range_subtype, ← submodule.map_top, ← b.span_eq, submodule.map_span,
← set.range_comp, ← finsupp.range_total] },
simpa only [@eq_comm _ x],
end
section constr
variables (S : Type*) [semiring S] [module S M']
variables [smul_comm_class R S M']
/-- Construct a linear map given the value at the basis.
This definition is parameterized over an extra `semiring S`,
such that `smul_comm_class R S M'` holds.
If `R` is commutative, you can set `S := R`; if `R` is not commutative,
you can recover an `add_equiv` by setting `S := ℕ`.
See library note [bundled maps over different rings].
-/
def constr : (ι → M') ≃ₗ[S] (M →ₗ[R] M') :=
{ to_fun := λ f, (finsupp.total M' M' R id).comp $ (finsupp.lmap_domain R R f) ∘ₗ ↑b.repr,
inv_fun := λ f i, f (b i),
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, simp },
right_inv := λ f, by { refine b.ext (λ i, _), simp },
map_add' := λ f g, by { refine b.ext (λ i, _), simp },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { refine b.ext (λ i, _), simp } }
theorem constr_def (f : ι → M') :
b.constr S f = (finsupp.total M' M' R id) ∘ₗ ((finsupp.lmap_domain R R f) ∘ₗ ↑b.repr) :=
rfl
theorem constr_apply (f : ι → M') (x : M) :
b.constr S f x = (b.repr x).sum (λ b a, a • f b) :=
by { simp only [constr_def, linear_map.comp_apply, finsupp.lmap_domain_apply, finsupp.total_apply],
rw finsupp.sum_map_domain_index; simp [add_smul] }
@[simp] lemma constr_basis (f : ι → M') (i : ι) :
(b.constr S f : M → M') (b i) = f i :=
by simp [basis.constr_apply, b.repr_self]
lemma constr_eq {g : ι → M'} {f : M →ₗ[R] M'}
(h : ∀i, g i = f (b i)) : b.constr S g = f :=
b.ext $ λ i, (b.constr_basis S g i).trans (h i)
lemma constr_self (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : b.constr S (λ i, f (b i)) = f :=
b.constr_eq S $ λ x, rfl
lemma constr_range [nonempty ι] {f : ι → M'} :
(b.constr S f).range = span R (range f) :=
by rw [b.constr_def S f, linear_map.range_comp, linear_map.range_comp, linear_equiv.range,
← finsupp.supported_univ, finsupp.lmap_domain_supported, ←set.image_univ,
← finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total, set.image_id]
@[simp]
lemma constr_comp (f : M' →ₗ[R] M') (v : ι → M') :
b.constr S (f ∘ v) = f.comp (b.constr S v) :=
b.ext (λ i, by simp only [basis.constr_basis, linear_map.comp_apply])
end constr
section equiv
variables (b' : basis ι' R M') (e : ι ≃ ι')
variables [add_comm_monoid M''] [module R M'']
/-- If `b` is a basis for `M` and `b'` a basis for `M'`, and the index types are equivalent,
`b.equiv b' e` is a linear equivalence `M ≃ₗ[R] M'`, mapping `b i` to `b' (e i)`. -/
protected def equiv : M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
b.repr.trans (b'.reindex e.symm).repr.symm
@[simp] lemma equiv_apply : b.equiv b' e (b i) = b' (e i) :=
by simp [basis.equiv]
@[simp] lemma equiv_refl :
b.equiv b (equiv.refl ι) = linear_equiv.refl R M :=
b.ext' (λ i, by simp)
@[simp] lemma equiv_symm : (b.equiv b' e).symm = b'.equiv b e.symm :=
b'.ext' $ λ i, (b.equiv b' e).injective (by simp)
@[simp] lemma equiv_trans {ι'' : Type*} (b'' : basis ι'' R M'')
(e : ι ≃ ι') (e' : ι' ≃ ι'') :
(b.equiv b' e).trans (b'.equiv b'' e') = b.equiv b'' (e.trans e') :=
b.ext' (λ i, by simp)
@[simp]
lemma map_equiv (b : basis ι R M) (b' : basis ι' R M') (e : ι ≃ ι') :
b.map (b.equiv b' e) = b'.reindex e.symm :=
by { ext i, simp }
end equiv
section prod
variables (b' : basis ι' R M')
/-- `basis.prod` maps a `ι`-indexed basis for `M` and a `ι'`-indexed basis for `M'`
to a `ι ⊕ ι'`-index basis for `M × M'`.
For the specific case of `R × R`, see also `basis.fin_two_prod`. -/
protected def prod : basis (ι ⊕ ι') R (M × M') :=
of_repr ((b.repr.prod b'.repr).trans (finsupp.sum_finsupp_lequiv_prod_finsupp R).symm)
@[simp]
lemma prod_repr_inl (x) (i) : (b.prod b').repr x (sum.inl i) = b.repr x.1 i := rfl
@[simp]
lemma prod_repr_inr (x) (i) : (b.prod b').repr x (sum.inr i) = b'.repr x.2 i := rfl
lemma prod_apply_inl_fst (i) :
(b.prod b' (sum.inl i)).1 = b i :=
b.repr.injective $ by
{ ext j,
simp only [basis.prod, basis.coe_of_repr, linear_equiv.symm_trans_apply, linear_equiv.prod_symm,
linear_equiv.prod_apply, b.repr.apply_symm_apply, linear_equiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
equiv.to_fun_as_coe, finsupp.fst_sum_finsupp_lequiv_prod_finsupp],
apply finsupp.single_apply_left sum.inl_injective }
lemma prod_apply_inr_fst (i) :
(b.prod b' (sum.inr i)).1 = 0 :=
b.repr.injective $ by
{ ext i,
simp only [basis.prod, basis.coe_of_repr, linear_equiv.symm_trans_apply, linear_equiv.prod_symm,
linear_equiv.prod_apply, b.repr.apply_symm_apply, linear_equiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
equiv.to_fun_as_coe, finsupp.fst_sum_finsupp_lequiv_prod_finsupp, linear_equiv.map_zero,
finsupp.zero_apply],
apply finsupp.single_eq_of_ne sum.inr_ne_inl }
lemma prod_apply_inl_snd (i) :
(b.prod b' (sum.inl i)).2 = 0 :=
b'.repr.injective $ by
{ ext j,
simp only [basis.prod, basis.coe_of_repr, linear_equiv.symm_trans_apply, linear_equiv.prod_symm,
linear_equiv.prod_apply, b'.repr.apply_symm_apply, linear_equiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
equiv.to_fun_as_coe, finsupp.snd_sum_finsupp_lequiv_prod_finsupp, linear_equiv.map_zero,
finsupp.zero_apply],
apply finsupp.single_eq_of_ne sum.inl_ne_inr }
lemma prod_apply_inr_snd (i) :
(b.prod b' (sum.inr i)).2 = b' i :=
b'.repr.injective $ by
{ ext i,
simp only [basis.prod, basis.coe_of_repr, linear_equiv.symm_trans_apply, linear_equiv.prod_symm,
linear_equiv.prod_apply, b'.repr.apply_symm_apply, linear_equiv.symm_symm, repr_self,
equiv.to_fun_as_coe, finsupp.snd_sum_finsupp_lequiv_prod_finsupp],
apply finsupp.single_apply_left sum.inr_injective }
@[simp]
lemma prod_apply (i) :
b.prod b' i = sum.elim (linear_map.inl R M M' ∘ b) (linear_map.inr R M M' ∘ b') i :=
by { ext; cases i; simp only [prod_apply_inl_fst, sum.elim_inl, linear_map.inl_apply,
prod_apply_inr_fst, sum.elim_inr, linear_map.inr_apply,
prod_apply_inl_snd, prod_apply_inr_snd, comp_app] }
end prod
section no_zero_smul_divisors
-- Can't be an instance because the basis can't be inferred.
protected lemma no_zero_smul_divisors [no_zero_divisors R] (b : basis ι R M) :
no_zero_smul_divisors R M :=
⟨λ c x hcx, or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr (λ hx, begin
rw [← b.total_repr x, ← linear_map.map_smul] at hcx,
have := linear_independent_iff.mp b.linear_independent (c • b.repr x) hcx,
rw smul_eq_zero at this,
exact this.resolve_right (λ hr, hx (b.repr.map_eq_zero_iff.mp hr))
end)⟩
protected lemma smul_eq_zero [no_zero_divisors R] (b : basis ι R M) {c : R} {x : M} :
c • x = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ x = 0 :=
@smul_eq_zero _ _ _ _ _ b.no_zero_smul_divisors _ _
lemma _root_.eq_bot_of_rank_eq_zero [no_zero_divisors R] (b : basis ι R M) (N : submodule R M)
(rank_eq : ∀ {m : ℕ} (v : fin m → N),
linear_independent R (coe ∘ v : fin m → M) → m = 0) :
N = ⊥ :=
begin
rw submodule.eq_bot_iff,
intros x hx,
contrapose! rank_eq with x_ne,
refine ⟨1, λ _, ⟨x, hx⟩, _, one_ne_zero⟩,
rw fintype.linear_independent_iff,
rintros g sum_eq i,
cases i,
simp only [function.const_apply, fin.default_eq_zero, submodule.coe_mk, finset.univ_unique,
function.comp_const, finset.sum_singleton] at sum_eq,
convert (b.smul_eq_zero.mp sum_eq).resolve_right x_ne
end
end no_zero_smul_divisors
section singleton
/-- `basis.singleton ι R` is the basis sending the unique element of `ι` to `1 : R`. -/
protected def singleton (ι R : Type*) [unique ι] [semiring R] :
basis ι R R :=
of_repr
{ to_fun := λ x, finsupp.single default x,
inv_fun := λ f, f default,
left_inv := λ x, by simp,
right_inv := λ f, finsupp.unique_ext (by simp),
map_add' := λ x y, by simp,
map_smul' := λ c x, by simp }
@[simp] lemma singleton_apply (ι R : Type*) [unique ι] [semiring R] (i) :
basis.singleton ι R i = 1 :=
apply_eq_iff.mpr (by simp [basis.singleton])
@[simp] lemma singleton_repr (ι R : Type*) [unique ι] [semiring R] (x i) :
(basis.singleton ι R).repr x i = x :=
by simp [basis.singleton, unique.eq_default i]
lemma basis_singleton_iff
{R M : Type*} [ring R] [nontrivial R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [no_zero_smul_divisors R M]
(ι : Type*) [unique ι] :
nonempty (basis ι R M) ↔ ∃ x ≠ 0, ∀ y : M, ∃ r : R, r • x = y :=
begin
fsplit,
{ rintro ⟨b⟩,
refine ⟨b default, b.linear_independent.ne_zero _, _⟩,
simpa [span_singleton_eq_top_iff, set.range_unique] using b.span_eq },
{ rintro ⟨x, nz, w⟩,
refine ⟨of_repr $ linear_equiv.symm
{ to_fun := λ f, f default • x,
inv_fun := λ y, finsupp.single default (w y).some,
left_inv := λ f, finsupp.unique_ext _,
right_inv := λ y, _,
map_add' := λ y z, _,
map_smul' := λ c y, _ }⟩,
{ rw [finsupp.add_apply, add_smul] },
{ rw [finsupp.smul_apply, smul_assoc], simp },
{ refine smul_left_injective _ nz _,
simp only [finsupp.single_eq_same],
exact (w (f default • x)).some_spec },
{ simp only [finsupp.single_eq_same],
exact (w y).some_spec } }
end
end singleton
section empty
variables (M)
/-- If `M` is a subsingleton and `ι` is empty, this is the unique `ι`-indexed basis for `M`. -/
protected def empty [subsingleton M] [is_empty ι] : basis ι R M :=
of_repr 0
instance empty_unique [subsingleton M] [is_empty ι] : unique (basis ι R M) :=
{ default := basis.empty M, uniq := λ ⟨x⟩, congr_arg of_repr $ subsingleton.elim _ _ }
end empty
end basis
section fintype
open basis
open fintype
variables [fintype ι] (b : basis ι R M)
/-- A module over `R` with a finite basis is linearly equivalent to functions from its basis to `R`.
-/
def basis.equiv_fun : M ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R) :=
linear_equiv.trans b.repr
({ to_fun := coe_fn,
map_add' := finsupp.coe_add,
map_smul' := finsupp.coe_smul,
..finsupp.equiv_fun_on_finite } : (ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R))
/-- A module over a finite ring that admits a finite basis is finite. -/
def module.fintype_of_fintype [fintype R] : fintype M :=
fintype.of_equiv _ b.equiv_fun.to_equiv.symm
theorem module.card_fintype [fintype R] [fintype M] :
card M = (card R) ^ (card ι) :=
calc card M = card (ι → R) : card_congr b.equiv_fun.to_equiv
... = card R ^ card ι : card_fun
/-- Given a basis `v` indexed by `ι`, the canonical linear equivalence between `ι → R` and `M` maps
a function `x : ι → R` to the linear combination `∑_i x i • v i`. -/
@[simp] lemma basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply (x : ι → R) :
b.equiv_fun.symm x = ∑ i, x i • b i :=
by simp [basis.equiv_fun, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum_fintype]
@[simp]
lemma basis.equiv_fun_apply (u : M) : b.equiv_fun u = b.repr u := rfl
@[simp] lemma basis.map_equiv_fun (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
(b.map f).equiv_fun = f.symm.trans b.equiv_fun :=
rfl
lemma basis.sum_equiv_fun (u : M) : ∑ i, b.equiv_fun u i • b i = u :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw ← b.total_repr u },
simp [finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum_fintype, b.equiv_fun_apply]
end
lemma basis.sum_repr (u : M) : ∑ i, b.repr u i • b i = u :=
b.sum_equiv_fun u
@[simp]
lemma basis.equiv_fun_self (i j : ι) : b.equiv_fun (b i) j = if i = j then 1 else 0 :=
by { rw [b.equiv_fun_apply, b.repr_self_apply] }
lemma basis.repr_sum_self (c : ι → R) : ⇑(b.repr (∑ i, c i • b i)) = c :=
begin
ext j,
simp only [map_sum, linear_equiv.map_smul, repr_self, finsupp.smul_single, smul_eq_mul,
mul_one, finset.sum_apply'],
rw [finset.sum_eq_single j, finsupp.single_eq_same],
{ rintros i - hi, exact finsupp.single_eq_of_ne hi },
{ intros, have := finset.mem_univ j, contradiction }
end
/-- Define a basis by mapping each vector `x : M` to its coordinates `e x : ι → R`,
as long as `ι` is finite. -/
def basis.of_equiv_fun (e : M ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R)) : basis ι R M :=
basis.of_repr $ e.trans $ linear_equiv.symm $ finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_finite R R ι
@[simp] lemma basis.of_equiv_fun_repr_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R)) (x : M) (i : ι) :
(basis.of_equiv_fun e).repr x i = e x i := rfl
@[simp] lemma basis.coe_of_equiv_fun (e : M ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R)) :
(basis.of_equiv_fun e : ι → M) = λ i, e.symm (function.update 0 i 1) :=
funext $ λ i, e.injective $ funext $ λ j,
by simp [basis.of_equiv_fun, ←finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, finsupp.single_eq_update]
@[simp] lemma basis.of_equiv_fun_equiv_fun
(v : basis ι R M) : basis.of_equiv_fun v.equiv_fun = v :=
begin
ext j,
simp only [basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, basis.coe_of_equiv_fun],
simp_rw [function.update_apply, ite_smul],
simp only [finset.mem_univ, if_true, pi.zero_apply, one_smul, finset.sum_ite_eq', zero_smul],
end
variables (S : Type*) [semiring S] [module S M']
variables [smul_comm_class R S M']
@[simp] theorem basis.constr_apply_fintype (f : ι → M') (x : M) :
(b.constr S f : M → M') x = ∑ i, (b.equiv_fun x i) • f i :=
by simp [b.constr_apply, b.equiv_fun_apply, finsupp.sum_fintype]
/-- If the submodule `P` has a finite basis,
`x ∈ P` iff it is a linear combination of basis vectors. -/
lemma basis.mem_submodule_iff' {P : submodule R M} (b : basis ι R P) {x : M} :
x ∈ P ↔ ∃ (c : ι → R), x = ∑ i, c i • b i :=
b.mem_submodule_iff.trans $ finsupp.equiv_fun_on_finite.exists_congr_left.trans $ exists_congr $
λ c, by simp [finsupp.sum_fintype]
lemma basis.coord_equiv_fun_symm (i : ι) (f : ι → R) : b.coord i (b.equiv_fun.symm f) = f i :=
b.coord_repr_symm i (finsupp.equiv_fun_on_finite.symm f)
end fintype
end module
section comm_semiring
namespace basis
variables [comm_semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [add_comm_monoid M'] [module R M']
variables (b : basis ι R M) (b' : basis ι' R M')
/-- If `b` is a basis for `M` and `b'` a basis for `M'`,
and `f`, `g` form a bijection between the basis vectors,
`b.equiv' b' f g hf hg hgf hfg` is a linear equivalence `M ≃ₗ[R] M'`, mapping `b i` to `f (b i)`.
-/
def equiv' (f : M → M') (g : M' → M)
(hf : ∀ i, f (b i) ∈ range b') (hg : ∀ i, g (b' i) ∈ range b)
(hgf : ∀i, g (f (b i)) = b i) (hfg : ∀i, f (g (b' i)) = b' i) :
M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
{ inv_fun := b'.constr R (g ∘ b'),
left_inv :=
have (b'.constr R (g ∘ b')).comp (b.constr R (f ∘ b)) = linear_map.id,
from (b.ext $ λ i, exists.elim (hf i)
(λ i' hi', by rw [linear_map.comp_apply, b.constr_basis, function.comp_apply, ← hi',
b'.constr_basis, function.comp_apply, hi', hgf, linear_map.id_apply])),
λ x, congr_arg (λ (h : M →ₗ[R] M), h x) this,
right_inv :=
have (b.constr R (f ∘ b)).comp (b'.constr R (g ∘ b')) = linear_map.id,
from (b'.ext $ λ i, exists.elim (hg i)
(λ i' hi', by rw [linear_map.comp_apply, b'.constr_basis, function.comp_apply, ← hi',
b.constr_basis, function.comp_apply, hi', hfg, linear_map.id_apply])),
λ x, congr_arg (λ (h : M' →ₗ[R] M'), h x) this,
.. b.constr R (f ∘ b) }
@[simp] lemma equiv'_apply (f : M → M') (g : M' → M) (hf hg hgf hfg) (i : ι) :
b.equiv' b' f g hf hg hgf hfg (b i) = f (b i) :=
b.constr_basis R _ _
@[simp] lemma equiv'_symm_apply (f : M → M') (g : M' → M) (hf hg hgf hfg) (i : ι') :
(b.equiv' b' f g hf hg hgf hfg).symm (b' i) = g (b' i) :=
b'.constr_basis R _ _
lemma sum_repr_mul_repr {ι'} [fintype ι'] (b' : basis ι' R M) (x : M) (i : ι) :
∑ (j : ι'), b.repr (b' j) i * b'.repr x j = b.repr x i :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [← b'.sum_repr x] },
simp_rw [linear_equiv.map_sum, linear_equiv.map_smul, finset.sum_apply'],
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ j _, _),
rw [finsupp.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
end
end basis
end comm_semiring
section module
open linear_map
variables {v : ι → M}
variables [ring R] [comm_ring R₂] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M'] [add_comm_group M'']
variables [module R M] [module R₂ M] [module R M'] [module R M'']
variables {c d : R} {x y : M}
variables (b : basis ι R M)
namespace basis
/--
Any basis is a maximal linear independent set.
-/
lemma maximal [nontrivial R] (b : basis ι R M) : b.linear_independent.maximal :=
λ w hi h,
begin
-- If `range w` is strictly bigger than `range b`,
apply le_antisymm h,
-- then choose some `x ∈ range w \ range b`,
intros x p,
by_contradiction q,
-- and write it in terms of the basis.
have e := b.total_repr x,
-- This then expresses `x` as a linear combination
-- of elements of `w` which are in the range of `b`,
let u : ι ↪ w := ⟨λ i, ⟨b i, h ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, λ i i' r,
b.injective (by simpa only [subtype.mk_eq_mk] using r)⟩,
have r : ∀ i, b i = u i := λ i, rfl,
simp_rw [finsupp.total_apply, r] at e,
change (b.repr x).sum (λ (i : ι) (a : R), (λ (x : w) (r : R), r • (x : M)) (u i) a) =
((⟨x, p⟩ : w) : M) at e,
rw [←finsupp.sum_emb_domain, ←finsupp.total_apply] at e,
-- Now we can contradict the linear independence of `hi`
refine hi.total_ne_of_not_mem_support _ _ e,
simp only [finset.mem_map, finsupp.support_emb_domain],
rintro ⟨j, -, W⟩,
simp only [embedding.coe_fn_mk, subtype.mk_eq_mk, ←r] at W,
apply q ⟨j, W⟩,
end
section mk
variables (hli : linear_independent R v) (hsp : ⊤ ≤ span R (range v))
/-- A linear independent family of vectors spanning the whole module is a basis. -/
protected noncomputable def mk : basis ι R M :=
basis.of_repr
{ inv_fun := finsupp.total _ _ _ v,
left_inv := λ x, hli.total_repr ⟨x, _⟩,
right_inv := λ x, hli.repr_eq rfl,
.. hli.repr.comp (linear_map.id.cod_restrict _ (λ h, hsp submodule.mem_top)) }
@[simp] lemma mk_repr :
(basis.mk hli hsp).repr x = hli.repr ⟨x, hsp submodule.mem_top⟩ :=
rfl
lemma mk_apply (i : ι) : basis.mk hli hsp i = v i :=
show finsupp.total _ _ _ v _ = v i, by simp
@[simp] lemma coe_mk : ⇑(basis.mk hli hsp) = v :=
funext (mk_apply _ _)
variables {hli hsp}
/-- Given a basis, the `i`th element of the dual basis evaluates to 1 on the `i`th element of the
basis. -/
lemma mk_coord_apply_eq (i : ι) :
(basis.mk hli hsp).coord i (v i) = 1 :=
show hli.repr ⟨v i, submodule.subset_span (mem_range_self i)⟩ i = 1,
by simp [hli.repr_eq_single i]
/-- Given a basis, the `i`th element of the dual basis evaluates to 0 on the `j`th element of the
basis if `j ≠ i`. -/
lemma mk_coord_apply_ne {i j : ι} (h : j ≠ i) :
(basis.mk hli hsp).coord i (v j) = 0 :=
show hli.repr ⟨v j, submodule.subset_span (mem_range_self j)⟩ i = 0,
by simp [hli.repr_eq_single j, h]
/-- Given a basis, the `i`th element of the dual basis evaluates to the Kronecker delta on the
`j`th element of the basis. -/
lemma mk_coord_apply {i j : ι} :
(basis.mk hli hsp).coord i (v j) = if j = i then 1 else 0 :=
begin
cases eq_or_ne j i,
{ simp only [h, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, mk_coord_apply_eq i], },
{ simp only [h, if_false, mk_coord_apply_ne h], },
end
end mk
section span
variables (hli : linear_independent R v)
/-- A linear independent family of vectors is a basis for their span. -/
protected noncomputable def span : basis ι R (span R (range v)) :=
basis.mk (linear_independent_span hli) $
begin
intros x _,
have h₁ : (coe : span R (range v) → M) '' set.range (λ i, subtype.mk (v i) _) = range v,
{ rw ← set.range_comp,
refl },
have h₂ : map (submodule.subtype (span R (range v)))
(span R (set.range (λ i, subtype.mk (v i) _))) = span R (range v),
{ rw [← span_image, submodule.coe_subtype, h₁] },
have h₃ : (x : M) ∈ map (submodule.subtype (span R (range v)))
(span R (set.range (λ i, subtype.mk (v i) _))),
{ rw h₂, apply subtype.mem x },
rcases mem_map.1 h₃ with ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩,
have h_x_eq_y : x = y,
{ rw [subtype.ext_iff, ← hy₂], simp },
rwa h_x_eq_y
end
protected lemma span_apply (i : ι) : (basis.span hli i : M) = v i :=
congr_arg (coe : span R (range v) → M) $ basis.mk_apply (linear_independent_span hli) _ i
end span
lemma group_smul_span_eq_top
{G : Type*} [group G] [distrib_mul_action G R] [distrib_mul_action G M]
[is_scalar_tower G R M] {v : ι → M} (hv : submodule.span R (set.range v) = ⊤) {w : ι → G} :
submodule.span R (set.range (w • v)) = ⊤ :=
begin
rw eq_top_iff,
intros j hj,
rw ← hv at hj,
rw submodule.mem_span at hj ⊢,
refine λ p hp, hj p (λ u hu, _),
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := hu,
have : ((w i)⁻¹ • 1 : R) • w i • v i ∈ p := p.smul_mem ((w i)⁻¹ • 1 : R) (hp ⟨i, rfl⟩),
rwa [smul_one_smul, inv_smul_smul] at this,
end
/-- Given a basis `v` and a map `w` such that for all `i`, `w i` are elements of a group,
`group_smul` provides the basis corresponding to `w • v`. -/
def group_smul {G : Type*} [group G] [distrib_mul_action G R] [distrib_mul_action G M]
[is_scalar_tower G R M] [smul_comm_class G R M] (v : basis ι R M) (w : ι → G) :
basis ι R M :=
@basis.mk ι R M (w • v) _ _ _
(v.linear_independent.group_smul w) (group_smul_span_eq_top v.span_eq).ge
lemma group_smul_apply {G : Type*} [group G] [distrib_mul_action G R] [distrib_mul_action G M]
[is_scalar_tower G R M] [smul_comm_class G R M] {v : basis ι R M} {w : ι → G} (i : ι) :
v.group_smul w i = (w • v : ι → M) i :=
mk_apply
(v.linear_independent.group_smul w) (group_smul_span_eq_top v.span_eq).ge i
lemma units_smul_span_eq_top {v : ι → M} (hv : submodule.span R (set.range v) = ⊤)
{w : ι → Rˣ} : submodule.span R (set.range (w • v)) = ⊤ :=
group_smul_span_eq_top hv
/-- Given a basis `v` and a map `w` such that for all `i`, `w i` is a unit, `smul_of_is_unit`
provides the basis corresponding to `w • v`. -/
def units_smul (v : basis ι R M) (w : ι → Rˣ) :
basis ι R M :=
@basis.mk ι R M (w • v) _ _ _
(v.linear_independent.units_smul w) (units_smul_span_eq_top v.span_eq).ge
lemma units_smul_apply {v : basis ι R M} {w : ι → Rˣ} (i : ι) :
v.units_smul w i = w i • v i :=
mk_apply
(v.linear_independent.units_smul w) (units_smul_span_eq_top v.span_eq).ge i
@[simp] lemma coord_units_smul (e : basis ι R₂ M) (w : ι → R₂ˣ) (i : ι) :
(e.units_smul w).coord i = (w i)⁻¹ • e.coord i :=
begin
apply e.ext,
intros j,
transitivity ((e.units_smul w).coord i) ((w j)⁻¹ • (e.units_smul w) j),
{ congr,
simp [basis.units_smul, ← mul_smul], },
simp only [basis.coord_apply, linear_map.smul_apply, basis.repr_self, units.smul_def,
smul_hom_class.map_smul, finsupp.single_apply],
split_ifs with h h,
{ simp [h] },
{ simp }
end
@[simp] lemma repr_units_smul (e : basis ι R₂ M) (w : ι → R₂ˣ) (v : M) (i : ι) :
(e.units_smul w).repr v i = (w i)⁻¹ • e.repr v i :=
congr_arg (λ f : M →ₗ[R₂] R₂, f v) (e.coord_units_smul w i)
/-- A version of `smul_of_units` that uses `is_unit`. -/
def is_unit_smul (v : basis ι R M) {w : ι → R} (hw : ∀ i, is_unit (w i)):
basis ι R M :=
units_smul v (λ i, (hw i).unit)
lemma is_unit_smul_apply {v : basis ι R M} {w : ι → R} (hw : ∀ i, is_unit (w i)) (i : ι) :
v.is_unit_smul hw i = w i • v i :=
units_smul_apply i
section fin
/-- Let `b` be a basis for a submodule `N` of `M`. If `y : M` is linear independent of `N`
and `y` and `N` together span the whole of `M`, then there is a basis for `M`
whose basis vectors are given by `fin.cons y b`. -/
noncomputable def mk_fin_cons {n : ℕ} {N : submodule R M} (y : M) (b : basis (fin n) R N)
(hli : ∀ (c : R) (x ∈ N), c • y + x = 0 → c = 0)
(hsp : ∀ (z : M), ∃ (c : R), z + c • y ∈ N) :
basis (fin (n + 1)) R M :=
have span_b : submodule.span R (set.range (N.subtype ∘ b)) = N,
{ rw [set.range_comp, submodule.span_image, b.span_eq, submodule.map_subtype_top] },
@basis.mk _ _ _ (fin.cons y (N.subtype ∘ b) : fin (n + 1) → M) _ _ _
((b.linear_independent.map' N.subtype (submodule.ker_subtype _)) .fin_cons' _ _ $
by { rintros c ⟨x, hx⟩ hc, rw span_b at hx, exact hli c x hx hc })
(λ x _, by { rw [fin.range_cons, submodule.mem_span_insert', span_b], exact hsp x })
@[simp] lemma coe_mk_fin_cons {n : ℕ} {N : submodule R M} (y : M) (b : basis (fin n) R N)
(hli : ∀ (c : R) (x ∈ N), c • y + x = 0 → c = 0)
(hsp : ∀ (z : M), ∃ (c : R), z + c • y ∈ N) :
(mk_fin_cons y b hli hsp : fin (n + 1) → M) = fin.cons y (coe ∘ b) :=
coe_mk _ _
/-- Let `b` be a basis for a submodule `N ≤ O`. If `y ∈ O` is linear independent of `N`
and `y` and `N` together span the whole of `O`, then there is a basis for `O`
whose basis vectors are given by `fin.cons y b`. -/
noncomputable def mk_fin_cons_of_le {n : ℕ} {N O : submodule R M}
(y : M) (yO : y ∈ O) (b : basis (fin n) R N) (hNO : N ≤ O)
(hli : ∀ (c : R) (x ∈ N), c • y + x = 0 → c = 0)
(hsp : ∀ (z ∈ O), ∃ (c : R), z + c • y ∈ N) :
basis (fin (n + 1)) R O :=
mk_fin_cons ⟨y, yO⟩ (b.map (submodule.comap_subtype_equiv_of_le hNO).symm)
(λ c x hc hx, hli c x (submodule.mem_comap.mp hc) (congr_arg coe hx))
(λ z, hsp z z.2)
@[simp] lemma coe_mk_fin_cons_of_le {n : ℕ} {N O : submodule R M}
(y : M) (yO : y ∈ O) (b : basis (fin n) R N) (hNO : N ≤ O)
(hli : ∀ (c : R) (x ∈ N), c • y + x = 0 → c = 0)
(hsp : ∀ (z ∈ O), ∃ (c : R), z + c • y ∈ N) :
(mk_fin_cons_of_le y yO b hNO hli hsp : fin (n + 1) → O) =
fin.cons ⟨y, yO⟩ (submodule.of_le hNO ∘ b) :=
coe_mk_fin_cons _ _ _ _
/-- The basis of `R × R` given by the two vectors `(1, 0)` and `(0, 1)`. -/
protected def fin_two_prod (R : Type*) [semiring R] : basis (fin 2) R (R × R) :=
basis.of_equiv_fun (linear_equiv.fin_two_arrow R R).symm
@[simp] lemma fin_two_prod_zero (R : Type*) [semiring R] : basis.fin_two_prod R 0 = (1, 0) :=
by simp [basis.fin_two_prod]
@[simp] lemma fin_two_prod_one (R : Type*) [semiring R] : basis.fin_two_prod R 1 = (0, 1) :=
by simp [basis.fin_two_prod]
@[simp] lemma coe_fin_two_prod_repr {R : Type*} [semiring R] (x : R × R) :
⇑((basis.fin_two_prod R).repr x) = ![x.fst, x.snd] :=
rfl
end fin
end basis
end module
section induction
variables [ring R] [is_domain R]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] {b : ι → M}
/-- If `N` is a submodule with finite rank, do induction on adjoining a linear independent
element to a submodule. -/
def submodule.induction_on_rank_aux (b : basis ι R M) (P : submodule R M → Sort*)
(ih : ∀ (N : submodule R M),
(∀ (N' ≤ N) (x ∈ N), (∀ (c : R) (y ∈ N'), c • x + y = (0 : M) → c = 0) → P N') → P N)
(n : ℕ) (N : submodule R M)
(rank_le : ∀ {m : ℕ} (v : fin m → N),
linear_independent R (coe ∘ v : fin m → M) → m ≤ n) :
P N :=
begin
haveI : decidable_eq M := classical.dec_eq M,
have Pbot : P ⊥,
{ apply ih,
intros N N_le x x_mem x_ortho,
exfalso,
simpa using x_ortho 1 0 N.zero_mem },
induction n with n rank_ih generalizing N,
{ suffices : N = ⊥,
{ rwa this },
apply eq_bot_of_rank_eq_zero b _ (λ m v hv, le_zero_iff.mp (rank_le v hv)) },
apply ih,
intros N' N'_le x x_mem x_ortho,
apply rank_ih,
intros m v hli,
refine nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp (rank_le (fin.cons ⟨x, x_mem⟩ (λ i, ⟨v i, N'_le (v i).2⟩)) _),
convert hli.fin_cons' x _ _,
{ ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp },
{ intros c y hcy,
refine x_ortho c y (submodule.span_le.mpr _ y.2) hcy,
rintros _ ⟨z, rfl⟩,
exact (v z).2 }
end
end induction
section division_ring
variables [division_ring K] [add_comm_group V] [add_comm_group V'] [module K V] [module K V']
variables {v : ι → V} {s t : set V} {x y z : V}
include K
open submodule
namespace basis
section exists_basis
/-- If `s` is a linear independent set of vectors, we can extend it to a basis. -/
noncomputable def extend (hs : linear_independent K (coe : s → V)) :
basis _ K V :=
basis.mk
(@linear_independent.restrict_of_comp_subtype _ _ _ id _ _ _ _ (hs.linear_independent_extend _))
(set_like.coe_subset_coe.mp $ by simpa using hs.subset_span_extend (subset_univ s))
lemma extend_apply_self (hs : linear_independent K (coe : s → V))
(x : hs.extend _) :
basis.extend hs x = x :=
basis.mk_apply _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_extend (hs : linear_independent K (coe : s → V)) :
⇑(basis.extend hs) = coe :=
funext (extend_apply_self hs)
lemma range_extend (hs : linear_independent K (coe : s → V)) :
range (basis.extend hs) = hs.extend (subset_univ _) :=
by rw [coe_extend, subtype.range_coe_subtype, set_of_mem_eq]
/-- If `v` is a linear independent family of vectors, extend it to a basis indexed by a sum type. -/
noncomputable def sum_extend (hs : linear_independent K v) :
basis (ι ⊕ _) K V :=
let s := set.range v,
e : ι ≃ s := equiv.of_injective v hs.injective,
b := hs.to_subtype_range.extend (subset_univ (set.range v)) in
(basis.extend hs.to_subtype_range).reindex $ equiv.symm $
calc ι ⊕ (b \ s : set V) ≃ s ⊕ (b \ s : set V) : equiv.sum_congr e (equiv.refl _)
... ≃ b : equiv.set.sum_diff_subset (hs.to_subtype_range.subset_extend _)
lemma subset_extend {s : set V} (hs : linear_independent K (coe : s → V)) :
s ⊆ hs.extend (set.subset_univ _) :=
hs.subset_extend _
section
variables (K V)
/-- A set used to index `basis.of_vector_space`. -/
noncomputable def of_vector_space_index : set V :=
(linear_independent_empty K V).extend (subset_univ _)
/-- Each vector space has a basis. -/
noncomputable def of_vector_space : basis (of_vector_space_index K V) K V :=
basis.extend (linear_independent_empty K V)
lemma of_vector_space_apply_self (x : of_vector_space_index K V) :
of_vector_space K V x = x :=
basis.mk_apply _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_of_vector_space :
⇑(of_vector_space K V) = coe :=
funext (λ x, of_vector_space_apply_self K V x)
lemma of_vector_space_index.linear_independent :
linear_independent K (coe : of_vector_space_index K V → V) :=
by { convert (of_vector_space K V).linear_independent, ext x, rw of_vector_space_apply_self }
lemma range_of_vector_space :
range (of_vector_space K V) = of_vector_space_index K V :=
range_extend _
lemma exists_basis : ∃ s : set V, nonempty (basis s K V) :=
⟨of_vector_space_index K V, ⟨of_vector_space K V⟩⟩
end
end exists_basis
end basis
open fintype
variables (K V)
theorem vector_space.card_fintype [fintype K] [fintype V] :
∃ n : ℕ, card V = (card K) ^ n :=
⟨card (basis.of_vector_space_index K V), module.card_fintype (basis.of_vector_space K V)⟩
section atoms_of_submodule_lattice
variables {K V}
/-- For a module over a division ring, the span of a nonzero element is an atom of the
lattice of submodules. -/
lemma nonzero_span_atom (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : is_atom (span K {v} : submodule K V) :=
begin
split,
{ rw submodule.ne_bot_iff, exact ⟨v, ⟨mem_span_singleton_self v, hv⟩⟩ },
{ intros T hT, by_contra, apply hT.2,
change (span K {v}) ≤ T,
simp_rw [span_singleton_le_iff_mem, ← ne.def, submodule.ne_bot_iff] at *,
rcases h with ⟨s, ⟨hs, hz⟩⟩,
cases (mem_span_singleton.1 (hT.1 hs)) with a ha,
have h : a ≠ 0, by { intro h, rw [h, zero_smul] at ha, exact hz ha.symm },
apply_fun (λ x, a⁻¹ • x) at ha,
simp_rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel h, one_smul, ha] at *, exact smul_mem T _ hs},
end
/-- The atoms of the lattice of submodules of a module over a division ring are the
submodules equal to the span of a nonzero element of the module. -/
lemma atom_iff_nonzero_span (W : submodule K V) :
is_atom W ↔ ∃ (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0), W = span K {v} :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _ ⟩,
{ cases h with hbot h,
rcases ((submodule.ne_bot_iff W).1 hbot) with ⟨v, ⟨hW, hv⟩⟩,
refine ⟨v, ⟨hv, _⟩⟩,
by_contra heq,
specialize h (span K {v}),
rw [span_singleton_eq_bot, lt_iff_le_and_ne] at h,
exact hv (h ⟨(span_singleton_le_iff_mem v W).2 hW, ne.symm heq⟩) },
{ rcases h with ⟨v, ⟨hv, rfl⟩⟩, exact nonzero_span_atom v hv },
end
/-- The lattice of submodules of a module over a division ring is atomistic. -/
instance : is_atomistic (submodule K V) :=
{ eq_Sup_atoms :=
begin
intro W,
use {T : submodule K V | ∃ (v : V) (hv : v ∈ W) (hz : v ≠ 0), T = span K {v}},
refine ⟨submodule_eq_Sup_le_nonzero_spans W, _⟩,
rintros _ ⟨w, ⟨_, ⟨hw, rfl⟩⟩⟩, exact nonzero_span_atom w hw
end }
end atoms_of_submodule_lattice
variables {K V}
lemma linear_map.exists_left_inverse_of_injective (f : V →ₗ[K] V')
(hf_inj : f.ker = ⊥) : ∃g:V' →ₗ[K] V, g.comp f = linear_map.id :=
begin
let B := basis.of_vector_space_index K V,
let hB := basis.of_vector_space K V,
have hB₀ : _ := hB.linear_independent.to_subtype_range,
have : linear_independent K (λ x, x : f '' B → V'),
{ have h₁ : linear_independent K (λ (x : ↥(⇑f '' range (basis.of_vector_space _ _))), ↑x) :=
@linear_independent.image_subtype _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f hB₀
(show disjoint _ _, by simp [hf_inj]),
rwa [basis.range_of_vector_space K V] at h₁ },
let C := this.extend (subset_univ _),
have BC := this.subset_extend (subset_univ _),
let hC := basis.extend this,
haveI : inhabited V := ⟨0⟩,
refine ⟨hC.constr ℕ (C.restrict (inv_fun f)), hB.ext (λ b, _)⟩,
rw image_subset_iff at BC,
have fb_eq : f b = hC ⟨f b, BC b.2⟩,
{ change f b = basis.extend this _,
rw [basis.extend_apply_self, subtype.coe_mk] },
dsimp [hB],
rw [basis.of_vector_space_apply_self, fb_eq, hC.constr_basis],
exact left_inverse_inv_fun (linear_map.ker_eq_bot.1 hf_inj) _
end
lemma submodule.exists_is_compl (p : submodule K V) : ∃ q : submodule K V, is_compl p q :=
let ⟨f, hf⟩ := p.subtype.exists_left_inverse_of_injective p.ker_subtype in
⟨f.ker, linear_map.is_compl_of_proj $ linear_map.ext_iff.1 hf⟩
instance module.submodule.complemented_lattice : complemented_lattice (submodule K V) :=
⟨submodule.exists_is_compl⟩
lemma linear_map.exists_right_inverse_of_surjective (f : V →ₗ[K] V')
(hf_surj : f.range = ⊤) : ∃g:V' →ₗ[K] V, f.comp g = linear_map.id :=
begin
let C := basis.of_vector_space_index K V',
let hC := basis.of_vector_space K V',
haveI : inhabited V := ⟨0⟩,
use hC.constr ℕ (C.restrict (inv_fun f)),
refine hC.ext (λ c, _),
rw [linear_map.comp_apply, hC.constr_basis],
simp [right_inverse_inv_fun (linear_map.range_eq_top.1 hf_surj) c]
end
/-- Any linear map `f : p →ₗ[K] V'` defined on a subspace `p` can be extended to the whole
space. -/
lemma linear_map.exists_extend {p : submodule K V} (f : p →ₗ[K] V') :
∃ g : V →ₗ[K] V', g.comp p.subtype = f :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := p.subtype.exists_left_inverse_of_injective p.ker_subtype in
⟨f.comp g, by rw [linear_map.comp_assoc, hg, f.comp_id]⟩
open submodule linear_map
/-- If `p < ⊤` is a subspace of a vector space `V`, then there exists a nonzero linear map
`f : V →ₗ[K] K` such that `p ≤ ker f`. -/
lemma submodule.exists_le_ker_of_lt_top (p : submodule K V) (hp : p < ⊤) :
∃ f ≠ (0 : V →ₗ[K] K), p ≤ ker f :=
begin
rcases set_like.exists_of_lt hp with ⟨v, -, hpv⟩, clear hp,
rcases (linear_pmap.sup_span_singleton ⟨p, 0⟩ v (1 : K) hpv).to_fun.exists_extend with ⟨f, hf⟩,
refine ⟨f, _, _⟩,
{ rintro rfl, rw [linear_map.zero_comp] at hf,
have := linear_pmap.sup_span_singleton_apply_mk ⟨p, 0⟩ v (1 : K) hpv 0 p.zero_mem 1,
simpa using (linear_map.congr_fun hf _).trans this },
{ refine λ x hx, mem_ker.2 _,
have := linear_pmap.sup_span_singleton_apply_mk ⟨p, 0⟩ v (1 : K) hpv x hx 0,
simpa using (linear_map.congr_fun hf _).trans this }
end
theorem quotient_prod_linear_equiv (p : submodule K V) :
nonempty (((V ⧸ p) × p) ≃ₗ[K] V) :=
let ⟨q, hq⟩ := p.exists_is_compl in nonempty.intro $
((quotient_equiv_of_is_compl p q hq).prod (linear_equiv.refl _ _)).trans
(prod_equiv_of_is_compl q p hq.symm)
end division_ring
|
bcf765795bdf2b440bb01fb76ccb211dbf1ee266 | bd30ef9a38da5172e55165b5cf19d92706763afa | /src/array_group.lean | 72eed949de941aec887536110375f8d4a9b0e186 | [] | no_license | kendfrey/rubiks-cube-group | 8838ce34704d8d150e5feba6f1e536b3d228dd37 | 3baebd73972384294931c75d584a491eb0fbc15c | refs/heads/master | 1,671,557,772,358 | 1,601,554,362,000 | 1,601,554,362,000 | 285,715,961 | 21 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,021 | lean | import algebra.group
open array
variables {n : ℕ} {α : Type*} [group α] (a b c : array n α)
instance : has_mul (array n α) := ⟨array.map₂ (*)⟩
instance : has_one (array n α) := ⟨mk_array n 1⟩
instance : has_inv (array n α) := ⟨flip array.map has_inv.inv⟩
private lemma mul_assoc : a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
begin
apply array.ext,
intros i,
apply mul_assoc,
end
private lemma one_mul : 1 * a = a :=
begin
apply array.ext,
intros i,
apply one_mul,
end
private lemma mul_one : a * 1 = a :=
begin
apply array.ext,
intros i,
apply mul_one,
end
private lemma mul_left_inv : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
begin
apply array.ext,
intros i,
apply mul_left_inv,
end
instance array_group : group (array n α) :=
{
mul := (*),
mul_assoc := mul_assoc,
one := 1,
one_mul := one_mul,
mul_one := mul_one,
inv := has_inv.inv,
mul_left_inv := mul_left_inv,
}
@[simp] lemma array.read_mul {a₁ a₂ : array n α} {i : fin n} : (a₁ * a₂).read i = a₁.read i * a₂.read i := rfl |
dfae3222a6f2600b160a0793339f23d38a7215e3 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/algebra/group_power.lean | 54256f15b6f4bcea31626ec9ac752123c3065d4a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,110 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis
The power operation on monoids and groups. We separate this from group, because it depends on
nat, which in turn depends on other parts of algebra.
We have "pow a n" for natural number powers, and "gpow a i" for integer powers. The notation
a^n is used for the first, but users can locally redefine it to gpow when needed.
Note: power adopts the convention that 0^0=1.
-/
import algebra.group
import data.int.basic data.list.basic
universes u v
variable {α : Type u}
/-- The power operation in a monoid. `a^n = a*a*...*a` n times. -/
def monoid.pow [monoid α] (a : α) : ℕ → α
| 0 := 1
| (n+1) := a * monoid.pow n
def add_monoid.smul [add_monoid α] (n : ℕ) (a : α) : α :=
@monoid.pow (multiplicative α) _ a n
precedence `•`:70
localized "infix ` • ` := add_monoid.smul" in add_monoid
@[priority 5] instance monoid.has_pow [monoid α] : has_pow α ℕ := ⟨monoid.pow⟩
/- monoid -/
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {β : Type u} [add_monoid β]
@[simp] theorem pow_zero (a : α) : a^0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_monoid.zero_smul (a : β) : 0 • a = 0 := rfl
theorem pow_succ (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a^(n+1) = a * a^n := rfl
theorem succ_smul (a : β) (n : ℕ) : (n+1)•a = a + n•a := rfl
@[simp] theorem pow_one (a : α) : a^1 = a := mul_one _
@[simp] theorem add_monoid.one_smul (a : β) : 1•a = a := add_zero _
theorem pow_mul_comm' (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a^n * a = a * a^n :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw [pow_zero, one_mul, mul_one],
rw [pow_succ, mul_assoc, ih]]
theorem smul_add_comm' : ∀ (a : β) (n : ℕ), n•a + a = a + n•a :=
@pow_mul_comm' (multiplicative β) _
theorem pow_succ' (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a^(n+1) = a^n * a :=
by rw [pow_succ, pow_mul_comm']
theorem succ_smul' (a : β) (n : ℕ) : (n+1)•a = n•a + a :=
by rw [succ_smul, smul_add_comm']
theorem pow_two (a : α) : a^2 = a * a :=
show a*(a*1)=a*a, by rw mul_one
theorem two_smul (a : β) : 2•a = a + a :=
show a+(a+0)=a+a, by rw add_zero
theorem pow_add (a : α) (m n : ℕ) : a^(m + n) = a^m * a^n :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw [add_zero, pow_zero, mul_one],
rw [pow_succ, ← pow_mul_comm', ← mul_assoc, ← ih, ← pow_succ']]; refl
theorem add_monoid.add_smul : ∀ (a : β) (m n : ℕ), (m + n)•a = m•a + n•a :=
@pow_add (multiplicative β) _
@[simp] theorem one_pow (n : ℕ) : (1 : α)^n = (1:α) :=
by induction n with n ih; [refl, rw [pow_succ, ih, one_mul]]
@[simp] theorem add_monoid.smul_zero (n : ℕ) : n•(0 : β) = (0:β) :=
by induction n with n ih; [refl, rw [succ_smul, ih, zero_add]]
theorem pow_mul (a : α) (m n : ℕ) : a^(m * n) = (a^m)^n :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw mul_zero, rw [nat.mul_succ, pow_add, pow_succ', ih]]; refl
theorem add_monoid.mul_smul' : ∀ (a : β) (m n : ℕ), m * n • a = n•(m•a) :=
@pow_mul (multiplicative β) _
theorem pow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℕ) : a^(m * n) = (a^n)^m :=
by rw [mul_comm, pow_mul]
theorem add_monoid.mul_smul (a : β) (m n : ℕ) : m * n • a = m•(n•a) :=
by rw [mul_comm, add_monoid.mul_smul']
@[simp] theorem add_monoid.smul_one [has_one β] : ∀ n : ℕ, n • (1 : β) = n :=
nat.eq_cast _ (add_monoid.zero_smul _) (add_monoid.one_smul _) (add_monoid.add_smul _)
theorem pow_bit0 (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a ^ bit0 n = a^n * a^n := pow_add _ _ _
theorem bit0_smul (a : β) (n : ℕ) : bit0 n • a = n•a + n•a := add_monoid.add_smul _ _ _
theorem pow_bit1 (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a ^ bit1 n = a^n * a^n * a :=
by rw [bit1, pow_succ', pow_bit0]
theorem bit1_smul : ∀ (a : β) (n : ℕ), bit1 n • a = n•a + n•a + a :=
@pow_bit1 (multiplicative β) _
theorem pow_mul_comm (a : α) (m n : ℕ) : a^m * a^n = a^n * a^m :=
by rw [←pow_add, ←pow_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_add_comm : ∀ (a : β) (m n : ℕ), m•a + n•a = n•a + m•a :=
@pow_mul_comm (multiplicative β) _
@[simp] theorem list.prod_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (list.repeat a n).prod = a ^ n :=
by induction n with n ih; [refl, rw [list.repeat_succ, list.prod_cons, ih]]; refl
@[simp] theorem list.sum_repeat : ∀ (a : β) (n : ℕ), (list.repeat a n).sum = n • a :=
@list.prod_repeat (multiplicative β) _
@[simp] lemma units.coe_pow (u : units α) (n : ℕ) : ((u ^ n : units α) : α) = u ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [*, pow_succ]
end monoid
namespace is_monoid_hom
variables {β : Type v} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f]
theorem map_pow (a : α) : ∀(n : ℕ), f (a ^ n) = (f a) ^ n
| 0 := is_monoid_hom.map_one f
| (nat.succ n) := by rw [pow_succ, is_monoid_hom.map_mul f, map_pow n]; refl
end is_monoid_hom
namespace is_add_monoid_hom
variables {β : Type*} [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β] (f : α → β) [is_add_monoid_hom f]
theorem map_smul (a : α) : ∀(n : ℕ), f (n • a) = n • (f a)
| 0 := is_add_monoid_hom.map_zero f
| (nat.succ n) := by rw [succ_smul, is_add_monoid_hom.map_add f, map_smul n]; refl
end is_add_monoid_hom
namespace monoid_hom
variables {β : Type v} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β)
@[simp] theorem map_pow (a : α) : ∀(n : ℕ), f (a ^ n) = (f a) ^ n
| 0 := f.map_one
| (nat.succ n) := by rw [pow_succ, f.map_mul, map_pow n]; refl
end monoid_hom
namespace add_monoid_hom
variables {β : Type*} [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β] (f : α →+ β)
@[simp] theorem map_smul (a : α) : ∀(n : ℕ), f (n • a) = n • (f a)
| 0 := f.map_zero
| (nat.succ n) := by rw [succ_smul, f.map_add, map_smul n]; refl
end add_monoid_hom
@[simp] theorem nat.pow_eq_pow (p q : ℕ) :
@has_pow.pow _ _ monoid.has_pow p q = p ^ q :=
by induction q with q ih; [refl, rw [nat.pow_succ, pow_succ, mul_comm, ih]]
@[simp] theorem nat.smul_eq_mul (m n : ℕ) : m • n = m * n :=
by induction m with m ih; [rw [add_monoid.zero_smul, zero_mul],
rw [succ_smul', ih, nat.succ_mul]]
/- commutative monoid -/
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_monoid α] {β : Type*} [add_comm_monoid β]
theorem mul_pow (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a * b)^n = a^n * b^n :=
by induction n with n ih; [exact (mul_one _).symm,
simp only [pow_succ, ih, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]]
theorem add_monoid.smul_add : ∀ (a b : β) (n : ℕ), n•(a + b) = n•a + n•b :=
@mul_pow (multiplicative β) _
instance pow.is_monoid_hom (n : ℕ) : is_monoid_hom ((^ n) : α → α) :=
{ map_mul := λ _ _, mul_pow _ _ _, map_one := one_pow _ }
instance add_monoid.smul.is_add_monoid_hom (n : ℕ) : is_add_monoid_hom (add_monoid.smul n : β → β) :=
{ map_add := λ _ _, add_monoid.smul_add _ _ _, map_zero := add_monoid.smul_zero _ }
end comm_monoid
section group
variables [group α] {β : Type*} [add_group β]
section nat
@[simp] theorem inv_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (a⁻¹)^n = (a^n)⁻¹ :=
by induction n with n ih; [exact one_inv.symm,
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, ih, mul_inv_rev]]
@[simp] theorem add_monoid.neg_smul : ∀ (a : β) (n : ℕ), n•(-a) = -(n•a) :=
@inv_pow (multiplicative β) _
theorem pow_sub (a : α) {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : a^(m - n) = a^m * (a^n)⁻¹ :=
have h1 : m - n + n = m, from nat.sub_add_cancel h,
have h2 : a^(m - n) * a^n = a^m, by rw [←pow_add, h1],
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h2
theorem add_monoid.smul_sub : ∀ (a : β) {m n : ℕ}, n ≤ m → (m - n)•a = m•a - n•a :=
@pow_sub (multiplicative β) _
theorem pow_inv_comm (a : α) (m n : ℕ) : (a⁻¹)^m * a^n = a^n * (a⁻¹)^m :=
by rw inv_pow; exact inv_comm_of_comm (pow_mul_comm _ _ _)
theorem add_monoid.smul_neg_comm : ∀ (a : β) (m n : ℕ), m•(-a) + n•a = n•a + m•(-a) :=
@pow_inv_comm (multiplicative β) _
end nat
open int
/--
The power operation in a group. This extends `monoid.pow` to negative integers
with the definition `a^(-n) = (a^n)⁻¹`.
-/
def gpow (a : α) : ℤ → α
| (of_nat n) := a^n
| -[1+n] := (a^(nat.succ n))⁻¹
def gsmul (n : ℤ) (a : β) : β :=
@gpow (multiplicative β) _ a n
@[priority 10] instance group.has_pow : has_pow α ℤ := ⟨gpow⟩
localized "infix ` • `:70 := gsmul" in add_group
localized "infix ` •ℕ `:70 := add_monoid.smul" in smul
localized "infix ` •ℤ `:70 := gsmul" in smul
@[simp] theorem gpow_coe_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n:ℤ) = a ^ n := rfl
@[simp] theorem gsmul_coe_nat (a : β) (n : ℕ) : (n:ℤ) • a = n •ℕ a := rfl
@[simp] theorem gpow_of_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a ^ of_nat n = a ^ n := rfl
@[simp] theorem gsmul_of_nat (a : β) (n : ℕ) : of_nat n • a = n •ℕ a := rfl
@[simp] theorem gpow_neg_succ (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a ^ -[1+n] = (a ^ n.succ)⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] theorem gsmul_neg_succ (a : β) (n : ℕ) : -[1+n] • a = - (n.succ •ℕ a) := rfl
local attribute [ematch] le_of_lt
open nat
@[simp] theorem gpow_zero (a : α) : a ^ (0:ℤ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_gsmul (a : β) : (0:ℤ) • a = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem gpow_one (a : α) : a ^ (1:ℤ) = a := mul_one _
@[simp] theorem one_gsmul (a : β) : (1:ℤ) • a = a := add_zero _
@[simp] theorem one_gpow : ∀ (n : ℤ), (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) := one_pow _
| -[1+ n] := show _⁻¹=(1:α), by rw [_root_.one_pow, one_inv]
@[simp] theorem gsmul_zero : ∀ (n : ℤ), n • (0 : β) = 0 :=
@one_gpow (multiplicative β) _
@[simp] theorem gpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℤ), a ^ -n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| 0 := one_inv.symm
| -[1+ n] := (inv_inv _).symm
@[simp] theorem neg_gsmul : ∀ (a : β) (n : ℤ), -n • a = -(n • a) :=
@gpow_neg (multiplicative β) _
theorem gpow_neg_one (x : α) : x ^ (-1:ℤ) = x⁻¹ := congr_arg has_inv.inv $ pow_one x
theorem neg_one_gsmul (x : β) : (-1:ℤ) • x = -x := congr_arg has_neg.neg $ add_monoid.one_smul x
theorem gsmul_one [has_one β] (n : ℤ) : n • (1 : β) = n :=
begin
cases n,
{ rw [gsmul_of_nat, add_monoid.smul_one, int.cast_of_nat] },
{ rw [gsmul_neg_succ, add_monoid.smul_one, int.cast_neg_succ_of_nat, nat.cast_succ] }
end
theorem inv_gpow (a : α) : ∀n:ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) := inv_pow a n
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg has_inv.inv $ inv_pow a (n+1)
private lemma gpow_add_aux (a : α) (m n : nat) :
a ^ ((of_nat m) + -[1+n]) = a ^ of_nat m * a ^ -[1+n] :=
or.elim (nat.lt_or_ge m (nat.succ n))
(assume h1 : m < succ n,
have h2 : m ≤ n, from le_of_lt_succ h1,
suffices a ^ -[1+ n-m] = a ^ of_nat m * a ^ -[1+n],
by rwa [of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_lt h1],
show (a ^ nat.succ (n - m))⁻¹ = a ^ of_nat m * a ^ -[1+n],
by rw [← succ_sub h2, pow_sub _ (le_of_lt h1), mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]; refl)
(assume : m ≥ succ n,
suffices a ^ (of_nat (m - succ n)) = (a ^ (of_nat m)) * (a ^ -[1+ n]),
by rw [of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_ge]; assumption,
suffices a ^ (m - succ n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n.succ)⁻¹, from this,
by rw pow_sub; assumption)
theorem gpow_add (a : α) : ∀ (i j : ℤ), a ^ (i + j) = a ^ i * a ^ j
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := pow_add _ _ _
| (of_nat m) -[1+n] := gpow_add_aux _ _ _
| -[1+m] (of_nat n) := by rw [add_comm, gpow_add_aux,
gpow_neg_succ, gpow_of_nat, ← inv_pow, ← pow_inv_comm]
| -[1+m] -[1+n] :=
suffices (a ^ (m + succ (succ n)))⁻¹ = (a ^ m.succ)⁻¹ * (a ^ n.succ)⁻¹, from this,
by rw [← succ_add_eq_succ_add, add_comm, _root_.pow_add, mul_inv_rev]
theorem add_gsmul : ∀ (a : β) (i j : ℤ), (i + j) • a = i • a + j • a :=
@gpow_add (multiplicative β) _
theorem gpow_add_one (a : α) (i : ℤ) : a ^ (i + 1) = a ^ i * a :=
by rw [gpow_add, gpow_one]
theorem add_one_gsmul : ∀ (a : β) (i : ℤ), (i + 1) • a = i • a + a :=
@gpow_add_one (multiplicative β) _
theorem gpow_one_add (a : α) (i : ℤ) : a ^ (1 + i) = a * a ^ i :=
by rw [gpow_add, gpow_one]
theorem one_add_gsmul : ∀ (a : β) (i : ℤ), (1 + i) • a = a + i • a :=
@gpow_one_add (multiplicative β) _
theorem gpow_mul_comm (a : α) (i j : ℤ) : a ^ i * a ^ j = a ^ j * a ^ i :=
by rw [← gpow_add, ← gpow_add, add_comm]
theorem gsmul_add_comm : ∀ (a : β) (i j), i • a + j • a = j • a + i • a :=
@gpow_mul_comm (multiplicative β) _
theorem gpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) := pow_mul _ _ _
| (m : ℕ) -[1+ n] := (gpow_neg _ (m * succ n)).trans $
show (a ^ (m * succ n))⁻¹ = _, by rw pow_mul; refl
| -[1+ m] (n : ℕ) := (gpow_neg _ (succ m * n)).trans $
show (a ^ (m.succ * n))⁻¹ = _, by rw [pow_mul, ← inv_pow]; refl
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := (pow_mul a (succ m) (succ n)).trans $
show _ = (_⁻¹^_)⁻¹, by rw [inv_pow, inv_inv]
theorem gsmul_mul' : ∀ (a : β) (m n : ℤ), m * n • a = n • (m • a) :=
@gpow_mul (multiplicative β) _
theorem gpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m :=
by rw [mul_comm, gpow_mul]
theorem gsmul_mul (a : β) (m n : ℤ) : m * n • a = m • (n • a) :=
by rw [mul_comm, gsmul_mul']
theorem gpow_bit0 (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a ^ bit0 n = a ^ n * a ^ n := gpow_add _ _ _
theorem bit0_gsmul (a : β) (n : ℤ) : bit0 n • a = n • a + n • a := gpow_add _ _ _
theorem gpow_bit1 (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a ^ bit1 n = a ^ n * a ^ n * a :=
by rw [bit1, gpow_add]; simp [gpow_bit0]
theorem bit1_gsmul : ∀ (a : β) (n : ℤ), bit1 n • a = n • a + n • a + a :=
@gpow_bit1 (multiplicative β) _
theorem gsmul_neg (a : β) (n : ℤ) : gsmul n (- a) = - gsmul n a :=
begin
induction n using int.induction_on with z ih z ih,
{ simp },
{ rw [add_comm] {occs := occurrences.pos [1]}, simp [add_gsmul, ih, -add_comm] },
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] {occs := occurrences.pos [1]},
simp [ih, add_gsmul, neg_gsmul, -add_comm] }
end
end group
namespace is_group_hom
variables {β : Type v} [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f]
theorem map_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n :=
is_monoid_hom.map_pow f a n
theorem map_gpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n :=
by cases n; [exact is_group_hom.map_pow f _ _,
exact (is_group_hom.map_inv f _).trans (congr_arg _ $ is_group_hom.map_pow f _ _)]
end is_group_hom
namespace is_add_group_hom
variables {β : Type v} [add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f]
theorem map_smul (a : α) (n : ℕ) : f (n • a) = n • f a :=
is_add_monoid_hom.map_smul f a n
theorem map_gsmul (a : α) (n : ℤ) : f (gsmul n a) = gsmul n (f a) :=
@is_group_hom.map_gpow (multiplicative α) (multiplicative β) _ _ f _ a n
end is_add_group_hom
namespace monoid_hom
variables {β : Type v} [group α] [group β] (f : α →* β)
@[simp] theorem map_gpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n :=
by cases n; [exact f.map_pow _ _,
exact (f.map_inv _).trans (congr_arg _ $ f.map_pow _ _)]
end monoid_hom
namespace add_monoid_hom
variables {β : Type v} [add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α →+ β)
@[simp] theorem map_gsmul (a : α) (n : ℤ) : f (gsmul n a) = gsmul n (f a) :=
by cases n; [exact f.map_smul _ _,
exact (f.map_neg _).trans (congr_arg _ $ f.map_smul _ _)]
end add_monoid_hom
local infix ` •ℤ `:70 := gsmul
open_locale smul
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_group α] {β : Type*} [add_comm_group β]
theorem mul_gpow (a b : α) : ∀ n:ℤ, (a * b)^n = a^n * b^n
| (n : ℕ) := mul_pow a b n
| -[1+ n] := show _⁻¹=_⁻¹*_⁻¹, by rw [mul_pow, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
theorem gsmul_add : ∀ (a b : β) (n : ℤ), n •ℤ (a + b) = n •ℤ a + n •ℤ b :=
@mul_gpow (multiplicative β) _
theorem gsmul_sub : ∀ (a b : β) (n : ℤ), gsmul n (a - b) = gsmul n a - gsmul n b :=
by simp [gsmul_add, gsmul_neg]
instance gpow.is_group_hom (n : ℤ) : is_group_hom ((^ n) : α → α) :=
{ map_mul := λ _ _, mul_gpow _ _ n }
instance gsmul.is_add_group_hom (n : ℤ) : is_add_group_hom (gsmul n : β → β) :=
{ map_add := λ _ _, gsmul_add _ _ n }
end comm_monoid
section group
@[instance]
theorem is_add_group_hom.gsmul
{α β} [add_group α] [add_comm_group β] (f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] (z : ℤ) :
is_add_group_hom (λa, gsmul z (f a)) :=
{ map_add := assume a b, by rw [is_add_hom.map_add f, gsmul_add] }
end group
@[simp] lemma with_bot.coe_smul [add_monoid α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
((add_monoid.smul n a : α) : with_bot α) = add_monoid.smul n a :=
by induction n; simp [*, succ_smul]; refl
theorem add_monoid.smul_eq_mul' [semiring α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) : n • a = a * n :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw [add_monoid.zero_smul, nat.cast_zero, mul_zero],
rw [succ_smul', ih, nat.cast_succ, mul_add, mul_one]]
theorem add_monoid.smul_eq_mul [semiring α] (n : ℕ) (a : α) : n • a = n * a :=
by rw [add_monoid.smul_eq_mul', nat.mul_cast_comm]
theorem add_monoid.mul_smul_left [semiring α] (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : n • (a * b) = a * (n • b) :=
by rw [add_monoid.smul_eq_mul', add_monoid.smul_eq_mul', mul_assoc]
theorem add_monoid.mul_smul_assoc [semiring α] (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : n • (a * b) = n • a * b :=
by rw [add_monoid.smul_eq_mul, add_monoid.smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
lemma zero_pow [semiring α] : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → (0 : α) ^ n = 0
| (n+1) _ := zero_mul _
@[simp, move_cast] theorem nat.cast_pow [semiring α] (n m : ℕ) : (↑(n ^ m) : α) = ↑n ^ m :=
by induction m with m ih; [exact nat.cast_one, rw [nat.pow_succ, pow_succ', nat.cast_mul, ih]]
@[simp, move_cast] theorem int.coe_nat_pow (n m : ℕ) : ((n ^ m : ℕ) : ℤ) = n ^ m :=
by induction m with m ih; [exact int.coe_nat_one, rw [nat.pow_succ, pow_succ', int.coe_nat_mul, ih]]
theorem int.nat_abs_pow (n : ℤ) (k : ℕ) : int.nat_abs (n ^ k) = (int.nat_abs n) ^ k :=
by induction k with k ih; [refl, rw [pow_succ', int.nat_abs_mul, nat.pow_succ, ih]]
theorem is_semiring_hom.map_pow {β} [semiring α] [semiring β]
(f : α → β) [is_semiring_hom f] (x : α) (n : ℕ) : f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n :=
by induction n with n ih; [exact is_semiring_hom.map_one f,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, is_semiring_hom.map_mul f, ih]]
@[simp] lemma ring_hom.map_pow {β} [semiring α] [semiring β] (f : α →+* β) (a) :
∀ n : ℕ, f (a ^ n) = (f a) ^ n :=
monoid_hom.map_pow f.to_monoid_hom a
theorem neg_one_pow_eq_or {R} [ring R] : ∀ n : ℕ, (-1 : R)^n = 1 ∨ (-1 : R)^n = -1
| 0 := or.inl rfl
| (n+1) := (neg_one_pow_eq_or n).swap.imp
(λ h, by rw [pow_succ, h, neg_one_mul, neg_neg])
(λ h, by rw [pow_succ, h, mul_one])
lemma pow_dvd_pow [comm_semiring α] (a : α) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
a ^ m ∣ a ^ n := ⟨a ^ (n - m), by rw [← pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h]⟩
theorem gsmul_eq_mul [ring α] (a : α) : ∀ n, n •ℤ a = n * a
| (n : ℕ) := add_monoid.smul_eq_mul _ _
| -[1+ n] := show -(_•_)=-_*_, by rw [neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, add_monoid.smul_eq_mul, nat.cast_succ]
theorem gsmul_eq_mul' [ring α] (a : α) (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ a = a * n :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_mul, int.mul_cast_comm]
theorem mul_gsmul_left [ring α] (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ (a * b) = a * (n •ℤ b) :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_mul', gsmul_eq_mul', mul_assoc]
theorem mul_gsmul_assoc [ring α] (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ (a * b) = n •ℤ a * b :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_mul, gsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
@[simp, move_cast] theorem int.cast_pow [ring α] (n : ℤ) (m : ℕ) : (↑(n ^ m) : α) = ↑n ^ m :=
by induction m with m ih; [exact int.cast_one,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, int.cast_mul, ih]]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two [ring α] {n : ℕ} : (-1 : α) ^ n = -1 ^ (n % 2) :=
by rw [← nat.mod_add_div n 2, pow_add, pow_mul]; simp [pow_two]
theorem sq_sub_sq [comm_ring α] (a b : α) : a ^ 2 - b ^ 2 = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
by rw [pow_two, pow_two, mul_self_sub_mul_self]
theorem pow_eq_zero [domain α] {x : α} {n : ℕ} (H : x^n = 0) : x = 0 :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ rw pow_zero at H,
rw [← mul_one x, H, mul_zero] },
exact or.cases_on (mul_eq_zero.1 H) id ih
end
@[field_simps] theorem pow_ne_zero [domain α] {a : α} (n : ℕ) (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 :=
mt pow_eq_zero h
@[simp] theorem one_div_pow [division_ring α] {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n :=
by induction n with n ih; [exact (div_one _).symm,
rw [pow_succ', ih, division_ring.one_div_mul_one_div (pow_ne_zero _ ha) ha]]; refl
@[simp] theorem division_ring.inv_pow [division_ring α] {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_eq_one_div] using one_div_pow ha n
@[simp] theorem div_pow [field α] (a : α) {b : α} (hb : b ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_one_div, mul_pow, one_div_pow hb, ← div_eq_mul_one_div]
theorem add_monoid.smul_nonneg [ordered_comm_monoid α] {a : α} (H : 0 ≤ a) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ n • a
| 0 := le_refl _
| (n+1) := add_nonneg' H (add_monoid.smul_nonneg n)
lemma pow_abs [decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (abs a)^n = abs (a^n) :=
by induction n with n ih; [exact (abs_one).symm,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ih, abs_mul]]
lemma abs_neg_one_pow [decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring α] (n : ℕ) : abs ((-1 : α)^n) = 1 :=
by rw [←pow_abs, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
@[field_simps] lemma inv_pow' [discrete_field α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹ :=
by induction n; simp [*, pow_succ, mul_inv', mul_comm]
@[field_simps] lemma pow_div [discrete_field α] (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a / b)^n = a^n / b^n :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow, inv_pow']
lemma pow_inv [division_ring α] (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a ≠ 0 → (a^n)⁻¹ = (a⁻¹)^n
| 0 ha := inv_one
| (n+1) ha := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ', mul_inv_eq (pow_ne_zero _ ha) ha, pow_inv _ ha]
namespace add_monoid
variable [ordered_comm_monoid α]
theorem smul_le_smul {a : α} {n m : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : n • a ≤ m • a :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.le.dest h in
calc n • a = n • a + 0 : (add_zero _).symm
... ≤ n • a + k • a : add_le_add_left' (smul_nonneg ha _)
... = m • a : by rw [← hk, add_smul]
lemma smul_le_smul_of_le_right {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, i • a ≤ i • b
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := add_le_add' hab (smul_le_smul_of_le_right _)
end add_monoid
namespace canonically_ordered_semiring
variable [canonically_ordered_comm_semiring α]
theorem pow_pos {a : α} (H : 0 < a) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < a ^ n
| 0 := canonically_ordered_semiring.zero_lt_one
| (n+1) := canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_pos.2 ⟨H, pow_pos n⟩
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_left {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, a^i ≤ b^i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul hab (pow_le_pow_of_le_left k)
theorem one_le_pow_of_one_le {a : α} (H : 1 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : 1 ≤ a ^ n :=
by simpa only [one_pow] using pow_le_pow_of_le_left H n
theorem pow_le_one {a : α} (H : a ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n ≤ 1:=
by simpa only [one_pow] using pow_le_pow_of_le_left H n
end canonically_ordered_semiring
section linear_ordered_semiring
variable [linear_ordered_semiring α]
theorem pow_pos {a : α} (H : 0 < a) : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < a ^ n
| 0 := zero_lt_one
| (n+1) := mul_pos H (pow_pos _)
theorem pow_nonneg {a : α} (H : 0 ≤ a) : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 := zero_le_one
| (n+1) := mul_nonneg H (pow_nonneg _)
theorem pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left {x y : α} {n : ℕ} (Hxy : x < y) (Hxpos : 0 ≤ x) (Hnpos : 0 < n) : x ^ n < y ^ n :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le Hxpos,
{ rw ←nat.sub_add_cancel Hnpos,
induction (n - 1), { simpa only [pow_one] },
rw [pow_add, pow_add, nat.succ_eq_add_one, pow_one, pow_one],
apply mul_lt_mul ih (le_of_lt Hxy) h (le_of_lt (pow_pos (lt_trans h Hxy) _)) },
{ rw [←h, zero_pow Hnpos], apply pow_pos (by rwa ←h at Hxy : 0 < y),}
end
theorem pow_right_inj {x y : α} {n : ℕ} (Hxpos : 0 ≤ x) (Hypos : 0 ≤ y) (Hnpos : 0 < n) (Hxyn : x ^ n = y ^ n) : x = y :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy x y with hxy | rfl | hyx,
{ exact absurd Hxyn (ne_of_lt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left hxy Hxpos Hnpos)) },
{ refl },
{ exact absurd Hxyn (ne_of_gt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left hyx Hypos Hnpos)) },
end
theorem one_le_pow_of_one_le {a : α} (H : 1 ≤ a) : ∀ (n : ℕ), 1 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 := le_refl _
| (n+1) := by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul H (one_le_pow_of_one_le n)
zero_le_one (le_trans zero_le_one H)
/-- Bernoulli's inequality. This version works for semirings but requires
an additional hypothesis `0 ≤ a * a`. -/
theorem one_add_mul_le_pow' {a : α} (Hsqr : 0 ≤ a * a) (H : 0 ≤ 1 + a) :
∀ (n : ℕ), 1 + n • a ≤ (1 + a) ^ n
| 0 := le_of_eq $ add_zero _
| (n+1) :=
calc 1 + (n + 1) • a ≤ (1 + a) * (1 + n • a) :
by simpa [succ_smul, mul_add, add_mul, add_monoid.mul_smul_left]
using add_monoid.smul_nonneg Hsqr n
... ≤ (1 + a)^(n+1) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (one_add_mul_le_pow' n) H
theorem pow_le_pow {a : α} {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.le.dest h in
calc a ^ n = a ^ n * 1 : (mul_one _).symm
... ≤ a ^ n * a ^ k : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(one_le_pow_of_one_le ha _)
(pow_nonneg (le_trans zero_le_one ha) _)
... = a ^ m : by rw [←hk, pow_add]
lemma pow_lt_pow {a : α} {n m : ℕ} (h : 1 < a) (h2 : n < m) : a ^ n < a ^ m :=
begin
have h' : 1 ≤ a := le_of_lt h,
have h'' : 0 < a := lt_trans zero_lt_one h,
cases m, cases h2, rw [pow_succ, ←one_mul (a ^ n)],
exact mul_lt_mul h (pow_le_pow h' (nat.le_of_lt_succ h2)) (pow_pos h'' _) (le_of_lt h'')
end
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_left {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, a^i ≤ b^i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := mul_le_mul hab (pow_le_pow_of_le_left _) (pow_nonneg ha _) (le_trans ha hab)
lemma lt_of_pow_lt_pow {a b : α} (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ^ n < b ^ n) : a < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn, not_lt_of_ge (pow_le_pow_of_le_left hb hn _) h
private lemma pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one_aux {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (ha : a < 1) (i : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, a ^ (i + k + 1) < a ^ i
| 0 := begin simp only [add_zero], rw ←one_mul (a^i), exact mul_lt_mul ha (le_refl _) (pow_pos h _) zero_le_one end
| (k+1) :=
begin
rw ←one_mul (a^i),
apply mul_lt_mul ha _ _ zero_le_one,
{ apply le_of_lt, apply pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one_aux },
{ show 0 < a ^ (i + (k + 1) + 0), apply pow_pos h }
end
private lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_one_aux {a : α} (h : 0 ≤ a) (ha : a ≤ 1) (i : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, a ^ (i + k) ≤ a ^ i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := by rw [←add_assoc, ←one_mul (a^i)];
exact mul_le_mul ha (pow_le_pow_of_le_one_aux _) (pow_nonneg h _) zero_le_one
lemma pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (ha : a < 1)
{i j : ℕ} (hij : i < j) : a ^ j < a ^ i :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hij in
by rw hk; exact pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one_aux h ha _ _
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_one {a : α} (h : 0 ≤ a) (ha : a ≤ 1)
{i j : ℕ} (hij : i ≤ j) : a ^ j ≤ a ^ i :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hij in
by rw hk; exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one_aux h ha _ _
lemma pow_le_one {x : α} : ∀ (n : ℕ) (h0 : 0 ≤ x) (h1 : x ≤ 1), x ^ n ≤ 1
| 0 h0 h1 := le_refl (1 : α)
| (n+1) h0 h1 := mul_le_one h1 (pow_nonneg h0 _) (pow_le_one n h0 h1)
end linear_ordered_semiring
theorem pow_two_nonneg [linear_ordered_ring α] (a : α) : 0 ≤ a ^ 2 :=
by { rw pow_two, exact mul_self_nonneg _ }
/-- Bernoulli's inequality for `n : ℕ`, `-2 ≤ a`. -/
theorem one_add_mul_le_pow [linear_ordered_ring α] {a : α} (H : -2 ≤ a) :
∀ (n : ℕ), 1 + n • a ≤ (1 + a) ^ n
| 0 := le_of_eq $ add_zero _
| 1 := by simp
| (n+2) :=
have H' : 0 ≤ 2 + a,
from neg_le_iff_add_nonneg.1 H,
have 0 ≤ n • (a * a * (2 + a)) + a * a,
from add_nonneg (add_monoid.smul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg a) H') n)
(mul_self_nonneg a),
calc 1 + (n + 2) • a ≤ 1 + (n + 2) • a + (n • (a * a * (2 + a)) + a * a) :
(le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).2 this
... = (1 + a) * (1 + a) * (1 + n • a) :
by { simp only [add_mul, mul_add, mul_two, mul_one, one_mul, succ_smul, add_monoid.smul_add,
add_monoid.mul_smul_assoc, (add_monoid.mul_smul_left _ _ _).symm],
ac_refl }
... ≤ (1 + a) * (1 + a) * (1 + a)^n :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (one_add_mul_le_pow n) (mul_self_nonneg (1 + a))
... = (1 + a)^(n + 2) : by simp only [pow_succ, mul_assoc]
/-- Bernoulli's inequality reformulated to estimate `a^n`. -/
theorem one_add_sub_mul_le_pow [linear_ordered_ring α]
{a : α} (H : -1 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : 1 + n • (a - 1) ≤ a ^ n :=
have -2 ≤ a - 1, by { rw [bit0, neg_add], exact sub_le_sub_right H 1 },
by simpa only [add_sub_cancel'_right] using one_add_mul_le_pow this n
namespace int
lemma units_pow_two (u : units ℤ) : u ^ 2 = 1 :=
(units_eq_one_or u).elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl) (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl)
lemma units_pow_eq_pow_mod_two (u : units ℤ) (n : ℕ) : u ^ n = u ^ (n % 2) :=
by conv {to_lhs, rw ← nat.mod_add_div n 2}; rw [pow_add, pow_mul, units_pow_two, one_pow, mul_one]
end int
@[simp] lemma neg_square {α} [ring α] (z : α) : (-z)^2 = z^2 :=
by simp [pow, monoid.pow]
lemma div_sq_cancel {α} [field α] {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b : α) : a^2 * b / a = a * b :=
by rw [pow_two, mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left _ ha]
|
39b6d268dde3ebe8873b9364283d11e85f8f78de | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/order/well_founded_set.lean | 5b090b714432dba21170e6c34fb14b5d9a381f57 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,975 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import data.set.finite
import order.well_founded
import order.order_iso_nat
import algebra.pointwise
/-!
# Well-founded sets
A well-founded subset of an ordered type is one on which the relation `<` is well-founded.
## Main Definitions
* `set.well_founded_on s r` indicates that the relation `r` is
well-founded when restricted to the set `s`.
* `set.is_wf s` indicates that `<` is well-founded when restricted to `s`.
* `set.partially_well_ordered_on s r` indicates that the relation `r` is
partially well-ordered (also known as well quasi-ordered) when restricted to the set `s`.
* `set.is_pwo s` indicates that any infinite sequence of elements in `s`
contains an infinite monotone subsequence. Note that
### Definitions for Hahn Series
* `set.add_antidiagonal s t a` and `set.mul_antidiagonal s t a` are the sets of pairs of elements
from `s` and `t` that add/multiply to `a`.
* `finset.add_antidiagonal` and `finset.mul_antidiagonal` are finite versions of
`set.add_antidiagonal` and `set.mul_antidiagonal` defined when `s` and `t` are well-founded.
## Main Results
* Higman's Lemma, `set.partially_well_ordered_on.partially_well_ordered_on_sublist_forall₂`,
shows that if `r` is partially well-ordered on `s`, then `list.sublist_forall₂` is partially
well-ordered on the set of lists of elements of `s`. The result was originally published by
Higman, but this proof more closely follows Nash-Williams.
* `set.well_founded_on_iff` relates `well_founded_on` to the well-foundedness of a relation on the
original type, to avoid dealing with subtypes.
* `set.is_wf.mono` shows that a subset of a well-founded subset is well-founded.
* `set.is_wf.union` shows that the union of two well-founded subsets is well-founded.
* `finset.is_wf` shows that all `finset`s are well-founded.
## References
* [Higman, *Ordering by Divisibility in Abstract Algebras*][Higman52]
* [Nash-Williams, *On Well-Quasi-Ordering Finite Trees*][Nash-Williams63]
-/
open_locale pointwise
variables {α : Type*}
namespace set
/-- `s.well_founded_on r` indicates that the relation `r` is well-founded when restricted to `s`. -/
def well_founded_on (s : set α) (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop :=
well_founded (λ (a : s) (b : s), r a b)
lemma well_founded_on_iff {s : set α} {r : α → α → Prop} :
s.well_founded_on r ↔ well_founded (λ (a b : α), r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s) :=
begin
have f : rel_embedding (λ (a : s) (b : s), r a b) (λ (a b : α), r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s) :=
⟨⟨coe, subtype.coe_injective⟩, λ a b, by simp⟩,
refine ⟨λ h, _, f.well_founded⟩,
rw well_founded.well_founded_iff_has_min,
intros t ht,
by_cases hst : (s ∩ t).nonempty,
{ rw ← subtype.preimage_coe_nonempty at hst,
rcases well_founded.well_founded_iff_has_min.1 h (coe ⁻¹' t) hst with ⟨⟨m, ms⟩, mt, hm⟩,
exact ⟨m, mt, λ x xt ⟨xm, xs, ms⟩, hm ⟨x, xs⟩ xt xm⟩ },
{ rcases ht with ⟨m, mt⟩,
exact ⟨m, mt, λ x xt ⟨xm, xs, ms⟩, hst ⟨m, ⟨ms, mt⟩⟩⟩ }
end
lemma well_founded_on.induction {s : set α} {r : α → α → Prop} (hs : s.well_founded_on r) {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ s) {P : α → Prop} (hP : ∀ (y ∈ s), (∀ (z ∈ s), r z y → P z) → P y) :
P x :=
begin
let Q : s → Prop := λ y, P y,
change Q ⟨x, hx⟩,
refine well_founded.induction hs ⟨x, hx⟩ _,
rintros ⟨y, ys⟩ ih,
exact hP _ ys (λ z zs zy, ih ⟨z, zs⟩ zy),
end
instance is_strict_order.subset {s : set α} {r : α → α → Prop} [is_strict_order α r] :
is_strict_order α (λ (a b : α), r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s) :=
{ to_is_irrefl := ⟨λ a con, irrefl_of r a con.1 ⟩,
to_is_trans := ⟨λ a b c ab bc, ⟨trans_of r ab.1 bc.1, ab.2.1, bc.2.2⟩ ⟩ }
theorem well_founded_on_iff_no_descending_seq {s : set α} {r : α → α → Prop} [is_strict_order α r] :
s.well_founded_on r ↔ ∀ (f : ((>) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r), ¬ (range f) ⊆ s :=
begin
rw [well_founded_on_iff, rel_embedding.well_founded_iff_no_descending_seq],
refine ⟨λ h f con, begin
refine h.elim' ⟨⟨f, f.injective⟩, λ a b, _⟩,
simp only [con (mem_range_self a), con (mem_range_self b), and_true, gt_iff_lt,
function.embedding.coe_fn_mk, f.map_rel_iff]
end, λ h, ⟨λ con, _⟩⟩,
rcases con with ⟨f, hf⟩,
have hfs' : ∀ n : ℕ, f n ∈ s := λ n, (hf.2 n.lt_succ_self).2.2,
refine h ⟨f, λ a b, _⟩ (λ n hn, _),
{ rw ← hf,
exact ⟨λ h, ⟨h, hfs' _, hfs' _⟩, λ h, h.1⟩ },
{ rcases set.mem_range.1 hn with ⟨m, hm⟩,
rw ← hm,
apply hfs' }
end
section has_lt
variables [has_lt α]
/-- `s.is_wf` indicates that `<` is well-founded when restricted to `s`. -/
def is_wf (s : set α) : Prop := well_founded_on s (<)
lemma is_wf_univ_iff : is_wf (univ : set α) ↔ well_founded ((<) : α → α → Prop) :=
by simp [is_wf, well_founded_on_iff]
variables {s t : set α}
theorem is_wf.mono (h : is_wf t) (st : s ⊆ t) : is_wf s :=
begin
rw [is_wf, well_founded_on_iff] at *,
refine subrelation.wf (λ x y xy, _) h,
exact ⟨xy.1, st xy.2.1, st xy.2.2⟩,
end
end has_lt
section partial_order
variables [partial_order α] {s t : set α} {a : α}
theorem is_wf_iff_no_descending_seq :
is_wf s ↔ ∀ (f : (order_dual ℕ) ↪o α), ¬ (range f) ⊆ s :=
begin
haveI : is_strict_order α (λ (a b : α), a < b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s) := {
to_is_irrefl := ⟨λ x con, lt_irrefl x con.1⟩,
to_is_trans := ⟨λ a b c ab bc, ⟨lt_trans ab.1 bc.1, ab.2.1, bc.2.2⟩⟩, },
rw [is_wf, well_founded_on_iff_no_descending_seq],
exact ⟨λ h f, h f.lt_embedding, λ h f, h (order_embedding.of_strict_mono
f (λ _ _, f.map_rel_iff.2))⟩,
end
theorem is_wf.union (hs : is_wf s) (ht : is_wf t) : is_wf (s ∪ t) :=
begin
classical,
rw [is_wf_iff_no_descending_seq] at *,
rintros f fst,
have h : infinite (f ⁻¹' s) ∨ infinite (f ⁻¹' t),
{ have h : infinite (univ : set ℕ) := infinite_univ,
have hpre : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = set.univ,
{ rw [← image_univ, image_subset_iff, univ_subset_iff] at fst,
exact fst },
rw preimage_union at hpre,
rw ← hpre at h,
rw [infinite, infinite],
rw infinite at h,
contrapose! h,
exact finite.union h.1 h.2, },
rw [← infinite_coe_iff, ← infinite_coe_iff] at h,
cases h with inf inf; haveI := inf,
{ apply hs ((nat.order_embedding_of_set (f ⁻¹' s)).dual.trans f),
change range (function.comp f (nat.order_embedding_of_set (f ⁻¹' s))) ⊆ s,
rw [range_comp, image_subset_iff],
simp },
{ apply ht ((nat.order_embedding_of_set (f ⁻¹' t)).dual.trans f),
change range (function.comp f (nat.order_embedding_of_set (f ⁻¹' t))) ⊆ t,
rw [range_comp, image_subset_iff],
simp }
end
end partial_order
end set
namespace set
/-- A subset is partially well-ordered by a relation `r` when any infinite sequence contains
two elements where the first is related to the second by `r`. -/
def partially_well_ordered_on (s) (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ (f : ℕ → α), range f ⊆ s → ∃ (m n : ℕ), m < n ∧ r (f m) (f n)
/-- A subset of a preorder is partially well-ordered when any infinite sequence contains
a monotone subsequence of length 2 (or equivalently, an infinite monotone subsequence). -/
def is_pwo [preorder α] (s) : Prop :=
partially_well_ordered_on s ((≤) : α → α → Prop)
theorem partially_well_ordered_on.mono {s t : set α} {r : α → α → Prop}
(ht : t.partially_well_ordered_on r) (hsub : s ⊆ t) :
s.partially_well_ordered_on r :=
λ f hf, ht f (set.subset.trans hf hsub)
theorem partially_well_ordered_on.image_of_monotone_on {s : set α}
{r : α → α → Prop} {β : Type*} {r' : β → β → Prop}
(hs : s.partially_well_ordered_on r) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a1 a2 : α, a1 ∈ s → a2 ∈ s → r a1 a2 → r' (f a1) (f a2)) :
(f '' s).partially_well_ordered_on r' :=
λ g hg, begin
have h := λ (n : ℕ), ((mem_image _ _ _).1 (hg (mem_range_self n))),
obtain ⟨m, n, hlt, hmn⟩ := hs (λ n, classical.some (h n)) _,
{ refine ⟨m, n, hlt, _⟩,
rw [← (classical.some_spec (h m)).2,
← (classical.some_spec (h n)).2],
exact hf _ _ (classical.some_spec (h m)).1 (classical.some_spec (h n)).1 hmn },
{ rintros _ ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact (classical.some_spec (h n)).1 }
end
section partial_order
variables {s : set α} {t : set α} {r : α → α → Prop}
theorem partially_well_ordered_on.exists_monotone_subseq [is_refl α r] [is_trans α r]
(h : s.partially_well_ordered_on r) (f : ℕ → α) (hf : range f ⊆ s) :
∃ (g : ℕ ↪o ℕ), ∀ m n : ℕ, m ≤ n → r (f (g m)) (f (g n)) :=
begin
obtain ⟨g, h1 | h2⟩ := exists_increasing_or_nonincreasing_subseq r f,
{ refine ⟨g, λ m n hle, _⟩,
obtain hlt | heq := lt_or_eq_of_le hle,
{ exact h1 m n hlt, },
{ rw [heq],
apply refl_of r } },
{ exfalso,
obtain ⟨m, n, hlt, hle⟩ := h (f ∘ g) (subset.trans (range_comp_subset_range _ _) hf),
exact h2 m n hlt hle }
end
theorem partially_well_ordered_on_iff_exists_monotone_subseq [is_refl α r] [is_trans α r] :
s.partially_well_ordered_on r ↔
∀ f : ℕ → α, range f ⊆ s → ∃ (g : ℕ ↪o ℕ), ∀ m n : ℕ, m ≤ n → r (f (g m)) (f (g n)) :=
begin
classical,
split; intros h f hf,
{ exact h.exists_monotone_subseq f hf },
{ obtain ⟨g, gmon⟩ := h f hf,
refine ⟨g 0, g 1, g.lt_iff_lt.2 zero_lt_one, gmon _ _ zero_le_one⟩, }
end
lemma partially_well_ordered_on.well_founded_on [is_partial_order α r]
(h : s.partially_well_ordered_on r) :
s.well_founded_on (λ a b, r a b ∧ a ≠ b) :=
begin
haveI : is_strict_order α (λ a b, r a b ∧ a ≠ b) :=
{ to_is_irrefl := ⟨λ a con, con.2 rfl⟩,
to_is_trans := ⟨λ a b c ab bc, ⟨trans ab.1 bc.1,
λ ac, ab.2 (antisymm ab.1 (ac.symm ▸ bc.1))⟩⟩ },
rw well_founded_on_iff_no_descending_seq,
intros f con,
obtain ⟨m, n, hlt, hle⟩ := h f con,
exact (f.map_rel_iff.2 hlt).2 (antisymm hle (f.map_rel_iff.2 hlt).1).symm,
end
variables [partial_order α]
lemma is_pwo.is_wf (h : s.is_pwo) :
s.is_wf :=
begin
rw [is_wf],
convert h.well_founded_on,
ext x y,
rw lt_iff_le_and_ne,
end
theorem is_pwo.exists_monotone_subseq
(h : s.is_pwo) (f : ℕ → α) (hf : range f ⊆ s) :
∃ (g : ℕ ↪o ℕ), monotone (f ∘ g) :=
h.exists_monotone_subseq f hf
theorem is_pwo_iff_exists_monotone_subseq :
s.is_pwo ↔
∀ f : ℕ → α, range f ⊆ s → ∃ (g : ℕ ↪o ℕ), monotone (f ∘ g) :=
partially_well_ordered_on_iff_exists_monotone_subseq
lemma is_pwo.prod (hs : s.is_pwo)
(ht : t.is_pwo) :
(s.prod t).is_pwo :=
begin
classical,
rw is_pwo_iff_exists_monotone_subseq at *,
intros f hf,
obtain ⟨g1, h1⟩ := hs (prod.fst ∘ f) _,
swap,
{ rw [range_comp, image_subset_iff],
refine subset.trans hf _,
rintros ⟨x1, x2⟩ hx,
simp only [mem_preimage, hx.1] },
obtain ⟨g2, h2⟩ := ht (prod.snd ∘ f ∘ g1) _,
refine ⟨g2.trans g1, λ m n mn, _⟩,
swap,
{ rw [range_comp, image_subset_iff],
refine subset.trans (range_comp_subset_range _ _) (subset.trans hf _),
rintros ⟨x1, x2⟩ hx,
simp only [mem_preimage, hx.2] },
simp only [rel_embedding.coe_trans, function.comp_app],
exact ⟨h1 (g2.le_iff_le.2 mn), h2 mn⟩,
end
theorem is_pwo.image_of_monotone {β : Type*} [partial_order β]
(hs : s.is_pwo) {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
is_pwo (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_monotone_on (λ _ _ _ _ ab, hf ab)
theorem is_pwo.union (hs : is_pwo s) (ht : is_pwo t) : is_pwo (s ∪ t) :=
begin
classical,
rw [is_pwo_iff_exists_monotone_subseq] at *,
rintros f fst,
have h : infinite (f ⁻¹' s) ∨ infinite (f ⁻¹' t),
{ have h : infinite (univ : set ℕ) := infinite_univ,
have hpre : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = set.univ,
{ rw [← image_univ, image_subset_iff, univ_subset_iff] at fst,
exact fst },
rw preimage_union at hpre,
rw ← hpre at h,
rw [infinite, infinite],
rw infinite at h,
contrapose! h,
exact finite.union h.1 h.2, },
rw [← infinite_coe_iff, ← infinite_coe_iff] at h,
cases h with inf inf; haveI := inf,
{ obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := hs (f ∘ (nat.order_embedding_of_set (f ⁻¹' s))) _,
{ rw [function.comp.assoc, ← rel_embedding.coe_trans] at hg,
exact ⟨_, hg⟩ },
rw [range_comp, image_subset_iff],
simp },
{ obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := ht (f ∘ (nat.order_embedding_of_set (f ⁻¹' t))) _,
{ rw [function.comp.assoc, ← rel_embedding.coe_trans] at hg,
exact ⟨_, hg⟩ },
rw [range_comp, image_subset_iff],
simp }
end
end partial_order
theorem is_wf.is_pwo [linear_order α] {s : set α}
(hs : s.is_wf) : s.is_pwo :=
λ f hf, begin
rw [is_wf, well_founded_on_iff] at hs,
have hrange : (range f).nonempty := ⟨f 0, mem_range_self 0⟩,
let a := hs.min (range f) hrange,
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hs.min_mem (range f) hrange,
refine ⟨m, m.succ, m.lt_succ_self, le_of_not_lt (λ con, _)⟩,
rw hm at con,
apply hs.not_lt_min (range f) hrange (mem_range_self m.succ)
⟨con, hf (mem_range_self m.succ), hf _⟩,
rw ← hm,
apply mem_range_self,
end
theorem is_wf_iff_is_pwo [linear_order α] {s : set α} :
s.is_wf ↔ s.is_pwo :=
⟨is_wf.is_pwo, is_pwo.is_wf⟩
end set
namespace finset
@[simp]
theorem partially_well_ordered_on {r : α → α → Prop} [is_refl α r] (f : finset α) :
set.partially_well_ordered_on (↑f : set α) r :=
begin
intros g hg,
by_cases hinj : function.injective g,
{ exact (set.infinite_of_injective_forall_mem hinj (set.range_subset_iff.1 hg)
f.finite_to_set).elim },
{ rw [function.injective] at hinj,
push_neg at hinj,
obtain ⟨m, n, gmgn, hne⟩ := hinj,
cases lt_or_gt_of_ne hne with hlt hlt;
{ refine ⟨_, _, hlt, _⟩,
rw gmgn,
exact refl_of r _, } }
end
@[simp]
theorem is_pwo [partial_order α] (f : finset α) :
set.is_pwo (↑f : set α) :=
f.partially_well_ordered_on
@[simp]
theorem well_founded_on {r : α → α → Prop} [is_strict_order α r] (f : finset α) :
set.well_founded_on (↑f : set α) r :=
begin
rw [set.well_founded_on_iff_no_descending_seq],
intros g con,
apply set.infinite_of_injective_forall_mem g.injective (set.range_subset_iff.1 con),
exact f.finite_to_set,
end
@[simp]
theorem is_wf [partial_order α] (f : finset α) : set.is_wf (↑f : set α) :=
f.is_pwo.is_wf
end finset
namespace set
variables [partial_order α] {s : set α} {a : α}
theorem finite.is_pwo (h : s.finite) : s.is_pwo :=
begin
rw ← h.coe_to_finset,
exact h.to_finset.is_pwo,
end
@[simp]
theorem fintype.is_pwo [fintype α] : s.is_pwo := (finite.of_fintype s).is_pwo
@[simp]
theorem is_pwo_empty : is_pwo (∅ : set α) :=
finite_empty.is_pwo
@[simp]
theorem is_pwo_singleton (a) : is_pwo ({a} : set α) :=
(finite_singleton a).is_pwo
theorem is_pwo.insert (a) (hs : is_pwo s) : is_pwo (insert a s) :=
by { rw ← union_singleton, exact hs.union (is_pwo_singleton a) }
/-- `is_wf.min` returns a minimal element of a nonempty well-founded set. -/
noncomputable def is_wf.min (hs : is_wf s) (hn : s.nonempty) : α :=
hs.min univ (nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty.1 hn.to_subtype)
lemma is_wf.min_mem (hs : is_wf s) (hn : s.nonempty) : hs.min hn ∈ s :=
(well_founded.min hs univ (nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty.1 hn.to_subtype)).2
lemma is_wf.not_lt_min (hs : is_wf s) (hn : s.nonempty) (ha : a ∈ s) : ¬ a < hs.min hn :=
hs.not_lt_min univ (nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty.1 hn.to_subtype) (mem_univ (⟨a, ha⟩ : s))
@[simp]
lemma is_wf_min_singleton (a) {hs : is_wf ({a} : set α)} {hn : ({a} : set α).nonempty} :
hs.min hn = a :=
eq_of_mem_singleton (is_wf.min_mem hs hn)
end set
@[simp]
theorem finset.is_wf_sup {ι : Type*} [partial_order α] (f : finset ι) (g : ι → set α)
(hf : ∀ i : ι, i ∈ f → (g i).is_wf) : (f.sup g).is_wf :=
begin
classical,
revert hf,
apply f.induction_on,
{ intro h,
simp [set.is_pwo_empty.is_wf], },
{ intros s f sf hf hsf,
rw finset.sup_insert,
exact (hsf s (finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).union (hf (λ s' s'f, hsf _
(finset.mem_insert_of_mem s'f))) }
end
@[simp]
theorem finset.is_pwo_sup {ι : Type*} [partial_order α] (f : finset ι) (g : ι → set α)
(hf : ∀ i : ι, i ∈ f → (g i).is_pwo) : (f.sup g).is_pwo :=
begin
classical,
revert hf,
apply f.induction_on,
{ intro h,
simp [set.is_pwo_empty.is_wf], },
{ intros s f sf hf hsf,
rw finset.sup_insert,
exact (hsf s (finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).union (hf (λ s' s'f, hsf _
(finset.mem_insert_of_mem s'f))) }
end
namespace set
variables [linear_order α] {s t : set α} {a : α}
lemma is_wf.min_le
(hs : s.is_wf) (hn : s.nonempty) (ha : a ∈ s) : hs.min hn ≤ a :=
le_of_not_lt (hs.not_lt_min hn ha)
lemma is_wf.le_min_iff
(hs : s.is_wf) (hn : s.nonempty) :
a ≤ hs.min hn ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ s → a ≤ b :=
⟨λ ha b hb, le_trans ha (hs.min_le hn hb), λ h, h _ (hs.min_mem _)⟩
lemma is_wf.min_le_min_of_subset
{hs : s.is_wf} {hsn : s.nonempty} {ht : t.is_wf} {htn : t.nonempty} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
ht.min htn ≤ hs.min hsn :=
(is_wf.le_min_iff _ _).2 (λ b hb, ht.min_le htn (hst hb))
lemma is_wf.min_union (hs : s.is_wf) (hsn : s.nonempty) (ht : t.is_wf) (htn : t.nonempty) :
(hs.union ht).min (union_nonempty.2 (or.intro_left _ hsn)) = min (hs.min hsn) (ht.min htn) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_min (is_wf.min_le_min_of_subset (subset_union_left _ _))
(is_wf.min_le_min_of_subset (subset_union_right _ _))) _,
rw min_le_iff,
exact ((mem_union _ _ _).1 ((hs.union ht).min_mem
(union_nonempty.2 (or.intro_left _ hsn)))).imp (hs.min_le _) (ht.min_le _),
end
end set
namespace set
variables {s : set α} {t : set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem is_pwo.mul [ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α] (hs : s.is_pwo) (ht : t.is_pwo) :
is_pwo (s * t) :=
begin
rw ← image_mul_prod,
exact (is_pwo.prod hs ht).image_of_monotone (λ _ _ h, mul_le_mul' h.1 h.2),
end
variable [linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α]
@[to_additive]
theorem is_wf.mul (hs : s.is_wf) (ht : t.is_wf) : is_wf (s * t) :=
(hs.is_pwo.mul ht.is_pwo).is_wf
@[to_additive]
theorem is_wf.min_mul (hs : s.is_wf) (ht : t.is_wf) (hsn : s.nonempty) (htn : t.nonempty) :
(hs.mul ht).min (hsn.mul htn) = hs.min hsn * ht.min htn :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (is_wf.min_le _ _ (mem_mul.2 ⟨_, _, hs.min_mem _, ht.min_mem _, rfl⟩)) _,
rw is_wf.le_min_iff,
rintros _ ⟨x, y, hx, hy, rfl⟩,
exact mul_le_mul' (hs.min_le _ hx) (ht.min_le _ hy),
end
end set
namespace set
namespace partially_well_ordered_on
/-- In the context of partial well-orderings, a bad sequence is a nonincreasing sequence
whose range is contained in a particular set `s`. One exists if and only if `s` is not
partially well-ordered. -/
def is_bad_seq (r : α → α → Prop) (s : set α) (f : ℕ → α) : Prop :=
set.range f ⊆ s ∧ ∀ (m n : ℕ), m < n → ¬ r (f m) (f n)
lemma iff_forall_not_is_bad_seq (r : α → α → Prop) (s : set α) :
s.partially_well_ordered_on r ↔
∀ f, ¬ is_bad_seq r s f :=
begin
rw [set.partially_well_ordered_on],
apply forall_congr (λ f, _),
simp [is_bad_seq]
end
/-- This indicates that every bad sequence `g` that agrees with `f` on the first `n`
terms has `rk (f n) ≤ rk (g n)`. -/
def is_min_bad_seq (r : α → α → Prop) (rk : α → ℕ) (s : set α) (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → α) : Prop :=
∀ g : ℕ → α, (∀ (m : ℕ), m < n → f m = g m) → rk (g n) < rk (f n) → ¬ is_bad_seq r s g
/-- Given a bad sequence `f`, this constructs a bad sequence that agrees with `f` on the first `n`
terms and is minimal at `n`.
-/
noncomputable def min_bad_seq_of_bad_seq (r : α → α → Prop) (rk : α → ℕ) (s : set α)
(n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → α) (hf : is_bad_seq r s f) :
{ g : ℕ → α // (∀ (m : ℕ), m < n → f m = g m) ∧ is_bad_seq r s g ∧ is_min_bad_seq r rk s n g } :=
begin
classical,
have h : ∃ (k : ℕ) (g : ℕ → α), (∀ m, m < n → f m = g m) ∧ is_bad_seq r s g
∧ rk (g n) = k :=
⟨_, f, λ _ _, rfl, hf, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩ := classical.some_spec (nat.find_spec h),
refine ⟨classical.some (nat.find_spec h), h1, by convert h2, λ g hg1 hg2 con, _⟩,
refine nat.find_min h _ ⟨g, λ m mn, (h1 m mn).trans (hg1 m mn), by convert con, rfl⟩,
rwa ← h3,
end
lemma exists_min_bad_of_exists_bad (r : α → α → Prop) (rk : α → ℕ) (s : set α) :
(∃ f, is_bad_seq r s f) → ∃ f, is_bad_seq r s f ∧ ∀ n, is_min_bad_seq r rk s n f :=
begin
rintro ⟨f0, (hf0 : is_bad_seq r s f0)⟩,
let fs : Π (n : ℕ), { f : ℕ → α // is_bad_seq r s f ∧ is_min_bad_seq r rk s n f },
{ refine nat.rec _ _,
{ exact ⟨(min_bad_seq_of_bad_seq r rk s 0 f0 hf0).1,
(min_bad_seq_of_bad_seq r rk s 0 f0 hf0).2.2⟩, },
{ exact λ n fn, ⟨(min_bad_seq_of_bad_seq r rk s (n + 1) fn.1 fn.2.1).1,
(min_bad_seq_of_bad_seq r rk s (n + 1) fn.1 fn.2.1).2.2⟩ } },
have h : ∀ m n, m ≤ n → (fs m).1 m = (fs n).1 m,
{ intros m n mn,
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le mn,
clear mn,
induction k with k ih,
{ refl },
rw [ih, ((min_bad_seq_of_bad_seq r rk s (m + k).succ (fs (m + k)).1 (fs (m + k)).2.1).2.1 m
(nat.lt_succ_iff.2 (nat.add_le_add_left k.zero_le m)))],
refl },
refine ⟨λ n, (fs n).1 n, ⟨set.range_subset_iff.2 (λ n, ((fs n).2).1.1 (mem_range_self n)),
λ m n mn, _⟩, λ n g hg1 hg2, _⟩,
{ dsimp,
rw [← subtype.val_eq_coe, h m n (le_of_lt mn)],
convert (fs n).2.1.2 m n mn },
{ convert (fs n).2.2 g (λ m mn, eq.trans _ (hg1 m mn)) (lt_of_lt_of_le hg2 (le_refl _)),
rw ← h m n (le_of_lt mn) },
end
lemma iff_not_exists_is_min_bad_seq {r : α → α → Prop} (rk : α → ℕ) {s : set α} :
s.partially_well_ordered_on r ↔ ¬ ∃ f, is_bad_seq r s f ∧ ∀ n, is_min_bad_seq r rk s n f :=
begin
rw [iff_forall_not_is_bad_seq, ← not_exists, not_congr],
split,
{ apply exists_min_bad_of_exists_bad },
rintro ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩,
exact ⟨f, hf1⟩,
end
/-- Higman's Lemma, which states that for any reflexive, transitive relation `r` which is
partially well-ordered on a set `s`, the relation `list.sublist_forall₂ r` is partially
well-ordered on the set of lists of elements of `s`. That relation is defined so that
`list.sublist_forall₂ r l₁ l₂` whenever `l₁` related pointwise by `r` to a sublist of `l₂`. -/
lemma partially_well_ordered_on_sublist_forall₂ (r : α → α → Prop) [is_refl α r] [is_trans α r]
{s : set α} (h : s.partially_well_ordered_on r) :
{ l : list α | ∀ x, x ∈ l → x ∈ s }.partially_well_ordered_on (list.sublist_forall₂ r) :=
begin
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨as, has⟩,
{ apply partially_well_ordered_on.mono (finset.partially_well_ordered_on {list.nil}),
{ intros l hl,
rw [finset.mem_coe, finset.mem_singleton, list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem],
exact hl, },
apply_instance },
haveI : inhabited α := ⟨as⟩,
rw [iff_not_exists_is_min_bad_seq (list.length)],
rintro ⟨f, hf1, hf2⟩,
have hnil : ∀ n, f n ≠ list.nil :=
λ n con, (hf1).2 n n.succ n.lt_succ_self (con.symm ▸ list.sublist_forall₂.nil),
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := h.exists_monotone_subseq (list.head ∘ f) _,
swap, { simp only [set.range_subset_iff, function.comp_apply],
exact λ n, hf1.1 (set.mem_range_self n) _ (list.head_mem_self (hnil n)) },
have hf' := hf2 (g 0) (λ n, if n < g 0 then f n else list.tail (f (g (n - g 0))))
(λ m hm, (if_pos hm).symm) _,
swap, { simp only [if_neg (lt_irrefl (g 0)), nat.sub_self],
rw [list.length_tail, ← nat.pred_eq_sub_one],
exact nat.pred_lt (λ con, hnil _ (list.length_eq_zero.1 con)) },
rw [is_bad_seq] at hf',
push_neg at hf',
obtain ⟨m, n, mn, hmn⟩ := hf' _,
swap, { rw set.range_subset_iff,
rintro n x hx,
split_ifs at hx with hn hn,
{ exact hf1.1 (set.mem_range_self _) _ hx },
{ refine hf1.1 (set.mem_range_self _) _ (list.tail_subset _ hx), } },
by_cases hn : n < g 0,
{ apply hf1.2 m n mn,
rwa [if_pos hn, if_pos (mn.trans hn)] at hmn },
{ obtain ⟨n', rfl⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.1 (not_lt.1 hn),
rw [if_neg hn, add_comm (g 0) n', nat.add_sub_cancel] at hmn,
split_ifs at hmn with hm hm,
{ apply hf1.2 m (g n') (lt_of_lt_of_le hm (g.monotone n'.zero_le)),
exact trans hmn (list.tail_sublist_forall₂_self _) },
{ rw [← (sub_lt_iff_left (le_of_not_lt hm))] at mn,
apply hf1.2 _ _ (g.lt_iff_lt.2 mn),
rw [← list.cons_head_tail (hnil (g (m - g 0))), ← list.cons_head_tail (hnil (g n'))],
exact list.sublist_forall₂.cons (hg _ _ (le_of_lt mn)) hmn, } }
end
end partially_well_ordered_on
namespace is_pwo
@[to_additive]
lemma submonoid_closure [ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α] {s : set α} (hpos : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → 1 ≤ x)
(h : s.is_pwo) : is_pwo ((submonoid.closure s) : set α) :=
begin
have hl : ((submonoid.closure s) : set α) ⊆ list.prod '' { l : list α | ∀ x, x ∈ l → x ∈ s },
{ intros x hx,
rw set_like.mem_coe at hx,
refine submonoid.closure_induction hx (λ x hx, ⟨_, λ y hy, _, list.prod_singleton⟩)
⟨_, λ y hy, (list.not_mem_nil _ hy).elim, list.prod_nil⟩ _,
{ rwa list.mem_singleton.1 hy },
rintros _ _ ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩ ⟨l', hl', rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, λ y hy, _, list.prod_append⟩,
cases list.mem_append.1 hy with hy hy,
{ exact hl _ hy },
{ exact hl' _ hy } },
apply ((h.partially_well_ordered_on_sublist_forall₂ (≤)).image_of_monotone_on _).mono hl,
intros l1 l2 hl1 hl2 h12,
obtain ⟨l, hll1, hll2⟩ := list.sublist_forall₂_iff.1 h12,
refine le_trans (list.rel_prod (le_refl 1) (λ a b ab c d cd, mul_le_mul' ab cd) hll1) _,
obtain ⟨l', hl'⟩ := hll2.exists_perm_append,
rw [hl'.prod_eq, list.prod_append, ← mul_one l.prod, mul_assoc, one_mul],
apply mul_le_mul_left',
have hl's := λ x hx, hl2 x (list.subset.trans (l.subset_append_right _) hl'.symm.subset hx),
clear hl',
induction l' with x1 x2 x3 x4 x5,
{ refl },
rw [list.prod_cons, ← one_mul (1 : α)],
exact mul_le_mul' (hpos x1 (hl's x1 (list.mem_cons_self x1 x2)))
(x3 (λ x hx, hl's x (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)))
end
end is_pwo
/-- `set.mul_antidiagonal s t a` is the set of all pairs of an element in `s` and an element in `t`
that multiply to `a`. -/
@[to_additive "`set.add_antidiagonal s t a` is the set of all pairs of an element in `s`
and an element in `t` that add to `a`."]
def mul_antidiagonal [monoid α] (s t : set α) (a : α) : set (α × α) :=
{ x | x.1 * x.2 = a ∧ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t }
namespace mul_antidiagonal
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_mul_antidiagonal [monoid α] {s t : set α} {a : α} {x : α × α} :
x ∈ mul_antidiagonal s t a ↔ x.1 * x.2 = a ∧ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t := iff.refl _
section cancel_comm_monoid
variables [cancel_comm_monoid α] {s t : set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive]
lemma fst_eq_fst_iff_snd_eq_snd {x y : (mul_antidiagonal s t a)} :
(x : α × α).fst = (y : α × α).fst ↔ (x : α × α).snd = (y : α × α).snd :=
⟨λ h, begin
have hx := x.2.1,
rw [subtype.val_eq_coe, h] at hx,
apply mul_left_cancel (hx.trans y.2.1.symm),
end, λ h, begin
have hx := x.2.1,
rw [subtype.val_eq_coe, h] at hx,
apply mul_right_cancel (hx.trans y.2.1.symm),
end⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_fst_eq_fst {x y : (mul_antidiagonal s t a)}
(h : (x : α × α).fst = (y : α × α).fst) : x = y :=
subtype.ext (prod.ext h (mul_antidiagonal.fst_eq_fst_iff_snd_eq_snd.1 h))
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_snd_eq_snd {x y : (mul_antidiagonal s t a)}
(h : (x : α × α).snd = (y : α × α).snd) : x = y :=
subtype.ext (prod.ext (mul_antidiagonal.fst_eq_fst_iff_snd_eq_snd.2 h) h)
end cancel_comm_monoid
section ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α] (s t : set α) (a : α)
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_fst_le_fst_of_snd_le_snd {x y : (mul_antidiagonal s t a)}
(h1 : (x : α × α).fst ≤ (y : α × α).fst) (h2 : (x : α × α).snd ≤ (y : α × α).snd ) :
x = y :=
begin
apply eq_of_fst_eq_fst,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le h1 with heq hlt,
{ exact heq },
exfalso,
exact ne_of_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hlt h2)
((mem_mul_antidiagonal.1 x.2).1.trans (mem_mul_antidiagonal.1 y.2).1.symm)
end
variables {s} {t}
@[to_additive]
theorem finite_of_is_pwo (hs : s.is_pwo) (ht : t.is_pwo) (a) :
(mul_antidiagonal s t a).finite :=
begin
by_contra h,
rw [← set.infinite] at h,
have h1 : (mul_antidiagonal s t a).partially_well_ordered_on (prod.fst ⁻¹'o (≤)),
{ intros f hf,
refine hs (prod.fst ∘ f) _,
rw range_comp,
rintros _ ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy, rfl⟩,
exact (mem_mul_antidiagonal.1 (hf hxy)).2.1 },
have h2 : (mul_antidiagonal s t a).partially_well_ordered_on (prod.snd ⁻¹'o (≤)),
{ intros f hf,
refine ht (prod.snd ∘ f) _,
rw range_comp,
rintros _ ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy, rfl⟩,
exact (mem_mul_antidiagonal.1 (hf hxy)).2.2 },
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := h1.exists_monotone_subseq (λ x, h.nat_embedding _ x) _,
swap, { rintro _ ⟨k, rfl⟩,
exact ((infinite.nat_embedding (s.mul_antidiagonal t a) h) _).2 },
obtain ⟨m, n, mn, h2'⟩ := h2 (λ x, (h.nat_embedding _) (g x)) _,
swap, { rintro _ ⟨k, rfl⟩,
exact ((infinite.nat_embedding (s.mul_antidiagonal t a) h) _).2, },
apply ne_of_lt mn (g.injective ((h.nat_embedding _).injective _)),
exact eq_of_fst_le_fst_of_snd_le_snd _ _ _ (hg _ _ (le_of_lt mn)) h2',
end
end ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
@[to_additive]
theorem finite_of_is_wf [linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α] {s t : set α}
(hs : s.is_wf) (ht : t.is_wf) (a) :
(mul_antidiagonal s t a).finite :=
finite_of_is_pwo hs.is_pwo ht.is_pwo a
end mul_antidiagonal
end set
namespace finset
variables [ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α]
variables {s t : set α} (hs : s.is_pwo) (ht : t.is_pwo) (a : α)
/-- `finset.mul_antidiagonal_of_is_wf hs ht a` is the set of all pairs of an element in
`s` and an element in `t` that multiply to `a`, but its construction requires proofs
`hs` and `ht` that `s` and `t` are well-ordered. -/
@[to_additive "`finset.add_antidiagonal_of_is_wf hs ht a` is the set of all pairs of an element in
`s` and an element in `t` that add to `a`, but its construction requires proofs
`hs` and `ht` that `s` and `t` are well-ordered."]
noncomputable def mul_antidiagonal : finset (α × α) :=
(set.mul_antidiagonal.finite_of_is_pwo hs ht a).to_finset
variables {hs} {ht} {u : set α} {hu : u.is_pwo} {a} {x : α × α}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_mul_antidiagonal :
x ∈ mul_antidiagonal hs ht a ↔ x.1 * x.2 = a ∧ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t :=
by simp [mul_antidiagonal]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_antidiagonal_mono_left (hus : u ⊆ s) :
(finset.mul_antidiagonal hu ht a) ⊆ (finset.mul_antidiagonal hs ht a) :=
λ x hx, begin
rw mem_mul_antidiagonal at *,
exact ⟨hx.1, hus hx.2.1, hx.2.2⟩,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_antidiagonal_mono_right (hut : u ⊆ t) :
(finset.mul_antidiagonal hs hu a) ⊆ (finset.mul_antidiagonal hs ht a) :=
λ x hx, begin
rw mem_mul_antidiagonal at *,
exact ⟨hx.1, hx.2.1, hut hx.2.2⟩,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma support_mul_antidiagonal_subset_mul :
{ a : α | (mul_antidiagonal hs ht a).nonempty } ⊆ s * t :=
(λ x ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ha⟩, begin
obtain ⟨hmul, h1, h2⟩ := mem_mul_antidiagonal.1 ha,
exact ⟨a1, a2, h1, h2, hmul⟩,
end)
@[to_additive]
theorem is_pwo_support_mul_antidiagonal :
{ a : α | (mul_antidiagonal hs ht a).nonempty }.is_pwo :=
(hs.mul ht).mono support_mul_antidiagonal_subset_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_antidiagonal_min_mul_min {α} [linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α] {s t : set α}
(hs : s.is_wf) (ht : t.is_wf)
(hns : s.nonempty) (hnt : t.nonempty) :
mul_antidiagonal hs.is_pwo ht.is_pwo ((hs.min hns) * (ht.min hnt)) =
{(hs.min hns, ht.min hnt)} :=
begin
ext ⟨a1, a2⟩,
rw [mem_mul_antidiagonal, finset.mem_singleton, prod.ext_iff],
split,
{ rintro ⟨hast, has, hat⟩,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (hs.min_le hns has) with heq hlt,
{ refine ⟨heq.symm, _⟩,
rw heq at hast,
exact mul_left_cancel hast },
{ contrapose hast,
exact ne_of_gt (mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hlt (ht.min_le hnt hat)) } },
{ rintro ⟨ha1, ha2⟩,
rw [ha1, ha2],
exact ⟨rfl, hs.min_mem _, ht.min_mem _⟩ }
end
end finset
lemma well_founded.is_wf [has_lt α] (h : well_founded ((<) : α → α → Prop)) (s : set α) :
s.is_wf :=
(set.is_wf_univ_iff.2 h).mono (set.subset_univ s)
|
f9ad8f1fb7809c48cd843822941a0b55671a2c1d | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /library/hott/logic.lean | 5c47a79f49f713c40f92c7e64db8f489a2c10567 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,314 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Leonardo de Moura
abbreviation id {A : Type} (a : A) := a
abbreviation compose {A : Type} {B : Type} {C : Type} (g : B → C) (f : A → B) := λ x, g (f x)
infixl `∘`:60 := compose
inductive path {A : Type} (a : A) : A → Type :=
| refl : path a a
infix `=`:50 := path
definition transport {A : Type} {a b : A} {P : A → Type} (H1 : a = b) (H2 : P a) : P b
:= path_rec H2 H1
namespace logic
notation p `*(`:75 u `)` := transport p u
end
using logic
definition symm {A : Type} {a b : A} (p : a = b) : b = a
:= p*(refl a)
definition trans {A : Type} {a b c : A} (p1 : a = b) (p2 : b = c) : a = c
:= p2*(p1)
calc_subst transport
calc_refl refl
calc_trans trans
namespace logic
postfix `⁻¹`:100 := symm
infixr `⬝`:75 := trans
end
using logic
theorem trans_refl_right {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p = p ⬝ (refl y)
:= refl p
theorem trans_refl_left {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p = (refl x) ⬝ p
:= path_rec (trans_refl_right (refl x)) p
theorem refl_symm {A : Type} (x : A) : (refl x)⁻¹ = (refl x)
:= refl (refl x)
theorem refl_trans {A : Type} (x : A) : (refl x) ⬝ (refl x) = (refl x)
:= refl (refl x)
theorem trans_symm {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p ⬝ p⁻¹ = refl x
:= have q : (refl x) ⬝ (refl x)⁻¹ = refl x, from
((refl_symm x)⁻¹)*(refl_trans x),
path_rec q p
theorem symm_trans {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p⁻¹ ⬝ p = refl y
:= have q : (refl x)⁻¹ ⬝ (refl x) = refl x, from
((refl_symm x)⁻¹)*(refl_trans x),
path_rec q p
theorem symm_symm {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : (p⁻¹)⁻¹ = p
:= have q : ((refl x)⁻¹)⁻¹ = refl x, from
refl (refl x),
path_rec q p
theorem trans_assoc {A : Type} {x y z w : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = w) : p ⬝ (q ⬝ r) = (p ⬝ q) ⬝ r
:= have e1 : (p ⬝ q) ⬝ (refl z) = p ⬝ q, from
(trans_refl_right (p ⬝ q))⁻¹,
have e2 : q ⬝ (refl z) = q, from
(trans_refl_right q)⁻¹,
have e3 : p ⬝ (q ⬝ (refl z)) = p ⬝ q, from
e2*(refl (p ⬝ (q ⬝ (refl z)))),
path_rec (e3 ⬝ e1⁻¹) r
definition ap {A : Type} {B : Type} (f : A → B) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : f a = f b
:= p*(refl (f a))
theorem ap_refl {A : Type} {B : Type} (f : A → B) (a : A) : ap f (refl a) = refl (f a)
:= refl (refl (f a))
section
parameters {A : Type} {B : Type} {C : Type}
parameters (f : A → B) (g : B → C)
parameters (x y z : A) (p : x = y) (q : y = z)
theorem ap_trans_dist : ap f (p ⬝ q) = (ap f p) ⬝ (ap f q)
:= have e1 : ap f (p ⬝ refl y) = (ap f p) ⬝ (ap f (refl y)), from refl _,
path_rec e1 q
theorem ap_inv_dist : ap f (p⁻¹) = (ap f p)⁻¹
:= have e1 : ap f ((refl x)⁻¹) = (ap f (refl x))⁻¹, from refl _,
path_rec e1 p
theorem ap_compose : ap g (ap f p) = ap (g∘f) p
:= have e1 : ap g (ap f (refl x)) = ap (g∘f) (refl x), from refl _,
path_rec e1 p
theorem ap_id : ap id p = p
:= have e1 : ap id (refl x) = (refl x), from refl (refl x),
path_rec e1 p
end
section
parameters {A : Type} {B : A → Type} (f : Π x, B x)
definition D [private] (x y : A) (p : x = y) := p*(f x) = f y
definition d [private] (x : A) : D x x (refl x)
:= refl (f x)
theorem apd {a b : A} (p : a = b) : p*(f a) = f b
:= path_rec (d a) p
end
abbreviation homotopy {A : Type} {P : A → Type} (f g : Π x, P x)
:= Π x, f x = g x
namespace logic
infix `∼`:50 := homotopy
end
using logic
notation `assume` binders `,` r:(scoped f, f) := r
notation `take` binders `,` r:(scoped f, f) := r
section
parameters {A : Type} {B : Type}
theorem hom_refl (f : A → B) : f ∼ f
:= take x, refl (f x)
theorem hom_symm {f g : A → B} : f ∼ g → g ∼ f
:= assume h, take x, (h x)⁻¹
theorem hom_trans {f g h : A → B} : f ∼ g → g ∼ h → f ∼ h
:= assume h1 h2, take x, (h1 x) ⬝ (h2 x)
theorem hom_fun {f g : A → B} {x y : A} (H : f ∼ g) (p : x = y) : (H x) ⬝ (ap g p) = (ap f p) ⬝ (H y)
:= have e1 : (H x) ⬝ (refl (g x)) = (refl (f x)) ⬝ (H x), from
calc (H x) ⬝ (refl (g x)) = H x : (trans_refl_right (H x))⁻¹
... = (refl (f x)) ⬝ (H x) : trans_refl_left (H x),
have e2 : (H x) ⬝ (ap g (refl x)) = (ap f (refl x)) ⬝ (H x), from
calc (H x) ⬝ (ap g (refl x)) = (H x) ⬝ (refl (g x)) : {ap_refl g x}
... = (refl (f x)) ⬝ (H x) : e1
... = (ap f (refl x)) ⬝ (H x) : {symm (ap_refl f x)},
path_rec e2 p
end
definition loop_space (A : Type) (a : A) := a = a
notation `Ω` `(` A `,` a `)` := loop_space A a
definition loop2d_space (A : Type) (a : A) := (refl a) = (refl a)
notation `Ω²` `(` A `,` a `)` := loop2d_space A a
inductive empty : Type
theorem empty_elim (c : Type) (H : empty) : c
:= empty_rec (λ e, c) H
definition not (A : Type) := A → empty
prefix `¬`:40 := not
theorem not_intro {a : Type} (H : a → empty) : ¬ a
:= H
theorem not_elim {a : Type} (H1 : ¬ a) (H2 : a) : empty
:= H1 H2
theorem absurd {a : Type} (H1 : a) (H2 : ¬ a) : empty
:= H2 H1
theorem mt {a b : Type} (H1 : a → b) (H2 : ¬ b) : ¬ a
:= assume Ha : a, absurd (H1 Ha) H2
theorem contrapos {a b : Type} (H : a → b) : ¬ b → ¬ a
:= assume Hnb : ¬ b, mt H Hnb
theorem absurd_elim {a : Type} (b : Type) (H1 : a) (H2 : ¬ a) : b
:= empty_elim b (absurd H1 H2)
inductive unit : Type :=
| star : unit
notation `⋆`:max := star
theorem absurd_not_unit (H : ¬ unit) : empty
:= absurd star H
theorem not_empty_trivial : ¬ empty
:= assume H : empty, H
theorem upun (x : unit) : x = ⋆
:= unit_rec (refl ⋆) x
inductive product (A : Type) (B : Type) : Type :=
| pair : A → B → product A B
infixr `×`:30 := product
infixr `∧`:30 := product
notation `(` h `,` t:(foldl `,` (e r, pair r e) h) `)` := t
definition pr1 {A : Type} {B : Type} (p : A × B) : A
:= product_rec (λ a b, a) p
definition pr2 {A : Type} {B : Type} (p : A × B) : B
:= product_rec (λ a b, b) p
theorem uppt {A : Type} {B : Type} (p : A × B) : (pr1 p, pr2 p) = p
:= product_rec (λ x y, refl (x, y)) p
inductive sum (A : Type) (B : Type) : Type :=
| inl : A → sum A B
| inr : B → sum A B
namespace logic
infixr `+`:25 := sum
end
using logic
infixr `∨`:25 := sum
theorem sum_elim {a : Type} {b : Type} {c : Type} (H1 : a + b) (H2 : a → c) (H3 : b → c) : c
:= sum_rec H2 H3 H1
theorem resolve_right {a : Type} {b : Type} (H1 : a + b) (H2 : ¬ a) : b
:= sum_elim H1 (assume Ha, absurd_elim b Ha H2) (assume Hb, Hb)
theorem resolve_left {a : Type} {b : Type} (H1 : a + b) (H2 : ¬ b) : a
:= sum_elim H1 (assume Ha, Ha) (assume Hb, absurd_elim a Hb H2)
theorem sum_flip {a : Type} {b : Type} (H : a + b) : b + a
:= sum_elim H (assume Ha, inr b Ha) (assume Hb, inl a Hb)
inductive Sigma {A : Type} (B : A → Type) : Type :=
| sigma_intro : Π a, B a → Sigma B
notation `Σ` binders `,` r:(scoped P, Sigma P) := r
definition dpr1 {A : Type} {B : A → Type} (p : Σ x, B x) : A
:= Sigma_rec (λ a b, a) p
definition dpr2 {A : Type} {B : A → Type} (p : Σ x, B x) : B (dpr1 p)
:= Sigma_rec (λ a b, b) p
|
9176db0972f39046e13cb814e981e4d0bba859c4 | ce6917c5bacabee346655160b74a307b4a5ab620 | /src/ch4/ex0506.lean | 1b521dbe3484a2b9d798f12b06e46493af4fa7cd | [] | no_license | Ailrun/Theorem_Proving_in_Lean | ae6a23f3c54d62d401314d6a771e8ff8b4132db2 | 2eb1b5caf93c6a5a555c79e9097cf2ba5a66cf68 | refs/heads/master | 1,609,838,270,467 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 240,967,761 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 179 | lean | variable f : ℕ → ℕ
variable h : ∀ x : ℕ, f x ≤ f (x + 1)
example : f 0 ≥ f 1 → f 0 = f 1 :=
assume : f 0 ≥ f 1,
show f 0 = f 1, from le_antisymm (h 0) this
|
fc7ea8683c62d303a384ad6cf5d705dee4c47460 | 8e6cad62ec62c6c348e5faaa3c3f2079012bdd69 | /src/analysis/complex/basic.lean | be6a21dbcd34ab1f8f13b7f9c48cf97817572fc2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | benjamindavidson/mathlib | 8cc81c865aa8e7cf4462245f58d35ae9a56b150d | fad44b9f670670d87c8e25ff9cdf63af87ad731e | refs/heads/master | 1,679,545,578,362 | 1,615,343,014,000 | 1,615,343,014,000 | 312,926,983 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,615,360,301,000 | 1,605,399,418,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,485 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import data.complex.module
import data.complex.is_R_or_C
/-!
# Normed space structure on `ℂ`.
This file gathers basic facts on complex numbers of an analytic nature.
## Main results
This file registers `ℂ` as a normed field, expresses basic properties of the norm, and gives
tools on the real vector space structure of `ℂ`. Notably, in the namespace `complex`,
it defines functions:
* `continuous_linear_map.re`
* `continuous_linear_map.im`
* `continuous_linear_map.of_real`
They are bundled versions of the real part, the imaginary part, and the embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`,
as continuous `ℝ`-linear maps.
We also register the fact that `ℂ` is an `is_R_or_C` field.
-/
noncomputable theory
namespace complex
instance : has_norm ℂ := ⟨abs⟩
instance : normed_group ℂ :=
normed_group.of_core ℂ
{ norm_eq_zero_iff := λ z, abs_eq_zero,
triangle := abs_add,
norm_neg := abs_neg }
instance : normed_field ℂ :=
{ norm := abs,
dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl,
norm_mul' := abs_mul,
.. complex.field }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℂ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by simp [norm]; norm_num⟩ }
instance normed_algebra_over_reals : normed_algebra ℝ ℂ :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := abs_of_real,
..complex.algebra_over_reals }
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_abs (z : ℂ) : ∥z∥ = abs z := rfl
lemma dist_eq (z w : ℂ) : dist z w = abs (z - w) := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_real (r : ℝ) : ∥(r : ℂ)∥ = ∥r∥ := abs_of_real _
@[simp] lemma norm_rat (r : ℚ) : ∥(r : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs (r : ℝ) :=
suffices ∥((r : ℝ) : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs r, by simpa,
by rw [norm_real, real.norm_eq_abs]
@[simp] lemma norm_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℂ)∥ = n := abs_of_nat _
@[simp] lemma norm_int {n : ℤ} : ∥(n : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs n :=
suffices ∥((n : ℝ) : ℂ)∥ = _root_.abs n, by simpa,
by rw [norm_real, real.norm_eq_abs]
lemma norm_int_of_nonneg {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 ≤ n) : ∥(n : ℂ)∥ = n :=
by rw [norm_int, _root_.abs_of_nonneg]; exact int.cast_nonneg.2 hn
/-- A complex normed vector space is also a real normed vector space. -/
@[priority 900]
instance normed_space.restrict_scalars_real (E : Type*) [normed_group E] [normed_space ℂ E] :
normed_space ℝ E := normed_space.restrict_scalars ℝ ℂ E
open continuous_linear_map
/-- Continuous linear map version of the real part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def continuous_linear_map.re : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
linear_map.re.mk_continuous 1 (λ x, by simp [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_re_le_abs])
@[continuity] lemma continuous_re : continuous re := continuous_linear_map.re.continuous
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.re_coe :
(coe (continuous_linear_map.re) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = linear_map.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.re_apply (z : ℂ) :
(continuous_linear_map.re : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.re_norm :
∥continuous_linear_map.re∥ = 1 :=
le_antisymm (linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _) $
calc 1 = ∥continuous_linear_map.re 1∥ : by simp
... ≤ ∥continuous_linear_map.re∥ : unit_le_op_norm _ _ (by simp)
/-- Continuous linear map version of the real part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def continuous_linear_map.im : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
linear_map.im.mk_continuous 1 (λ x, by simp [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_im_le_abs])
@[continuity] lemma continuous_im : continuous im := continuous_linear_map.im.continuous
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.im_coe :
(coe (continuous_linear_map.im) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = linear_map.im := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.im_apply (z : ℂ) :
(continuous_linear_map.im : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.im := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.im_norm :
∥continuous_linear_map.im∥ = 1 :=
le_antisymm (linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _) $
calc 1 = ∥continuous_linear_map.im I∥ : by simp
... ≤ ∥continuous_linear_map.im∥ : unit_le_op_norm _ _ (by simp)
/-- The complex-conjugation function from `ℂ` to itself is an isometric linear map. -/
def linear_isometry.conj : ℂ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ := ⟨linear_map.conj, λ x, by simp⟩
/-- Continuous linear map version of the conj function, from `ℂ` to `ℂ`. -/
def continuous_linear_map.conj : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ := linear_isometry.conj.to_continuous_linear_map
lemma isometry_conj : isometry (conj : ℂ → ℂ) := linear_isometry.conj.isometry
@[continuity] lemma continuous_conj : continuous conj := continuous_linear_map.conj.continuous
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.conj_coe :
(coe (continuous_linear_map.conj) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ) = linear_map.conj := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.conj_apply (z : ℂ) :
(continuous_linear_map.conj : ℂ → ℂ) z = z.conj := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.conj_norm :
∥continuous_linear_map.conj∥ = 1 :=
linear_isometry.conj.norm_to_continuous_linear_map
/-- Linear isometry version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def linear_isometry.of_real : ℝ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ := ⟨linear_map.of_real, λ x, by simp⟩
/-- Continuous linear map version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def continuous_linear_map.of_real : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ := linear_isometry.of_real.to_continuous_linear_map
lemma isometry_of_real : isometry (coe : ℝ → ℂ) := linear_isometry.of_real.isometry
@[continuity] lemma continuous_of_real : continuous (coe : ℝ → ℂ) := isometry_of_real.continuous
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.of_real_coe :
(coe (continuous_linear_map.of_real) : ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ) = linear_map.of_real := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.of_real_apply (x : ℝ) :
(continuous_linear_map.of_real : ℝ → ℂ) x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.of_real_norm :
∥continuous_linear_map.of_real∥ = 1 :=
linear_isometry.of_real.norm_to_continuous_linear_map
noncomputable instance : is_R_or_C ℂ :=
{ re := ⟨complex.re, complex.zero_re, complex.add_re⟩,
im := ⟨complex.im, complex.zero_im, complex.add_im⟩,
conj := complex.conj,
I := complex.I,
I_re_ax := by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.I_re],
I_mul_I_ax := by simp only [complex.I_mul_I, eq_self_iff_true, or_true],
re_add_im_ax := λ z, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.re_add_im,
complex.coe_algebra_map, complex.of_real_eq_coe],
of_real_re_ax := λ r, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.of_real_re,
complex.coe_algebra_map, complex.of_real_eq_coe],
of_real_im_ax := λ r, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.of_real_im,
complex.coe_algebra_map, complex.of_real_eq_coe],
mul_re_ax := λ z w, by simp only [complex.mul_re, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk],
mul_im_ax := λ z w, by simp only [add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.mul_im],
conj_re_ax := λ z, by simp only [ring_hom.coe_mk, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.conj_re],
conj_im_ax := λ z, by simp only [ring_hom.coe_mk, complex.conj_im, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk],
conj_I_ax := by simp only [complex.conj_I, ring_hom.coe_mk],
norm_sq_eq_def_ax := λ z, by simp only [←complex.norm_sq_eq_abs, ←complex.norm_sq_apply,
add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.norm_eq_abs],
mul_im_I_ax := λ z, by simp only [mul_one, add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, complex.I_im],
inv_def_ax := λ z, by simp only [complex.inv_def, complex.norm_sq_eq_abs, complex.coe_algebra_map,
complex.of_real_eq_coe, complex.norm_eq_abs],
div_I_ax := complex.div_I }
end complex
namespace is_R_or_C
local notation `reC` := @is_R_or_C.re ℂ _
local notation `imC` := @is_R_or_C.im ℂ _
local notation `conjC` := @is_R_or_C.conj ℂ _
local notation `IC` := @is_R_or_C.I ℂ _
local notation `absC` := @is_R_or_C.abs ℂ _
local notation `norm_sqC` := @is_R_or_C.norm_sq ℂ _
@[simp] lemma re_to_complex {x : ℂ} : reC x = x.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_to_complex {x : ℂ} : imC x = x.im := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_to_complex {x : ℂ} : conjC x = x.conj := rfl
@[simp] lemma I_to_complex : IC = complex.I := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_to_complex {x : ℂ} : norm_sqC x = complex.norm_sq x :=
by simp [is_R_or_C.norm_sq, complex.norm_sq]
@[simp] lemma abs_to_complex {x : ℂ} : absC x = complex.abs x :=
by simp [is_R_or_C.abs, complex.abs]
end is_R_or_C
|
0d28c44cd11da8e9242e5f18c6597341d3766f40 | b70447c014d9e71cf619ebc9f539b262c19c2e0b | /hott/homotopy/homotopy_group.hlean | 67326016787b5b66891edb05a57f605a05cd8ea1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ia0/lean2 | c20d8da69657f94b1d161f9590a4c635f8dc87f3 | d86284da630acb78fa5dc3b0b106153c50ffccd0 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,399,322,751 | 1,495,751,007,000 | 1,495,751,007,000 | 93,104,167 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,496,355,488,000 | 1,496,355,487,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,657 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Clive Newstead
-/
import .LES_of_homotopy_groups .sphere .complex_hopf
open eq is_trunc trunc_index pointed algebra trunc nat is_conn fiber pointed unit
namespace is_trunc
-- Lemma 8.3.1
theorem trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc (A : Type*) {n k : ℕ} [is_trunc n A] (H : n < k)
: is_contr (π[k] A) :=
begin
apply is_trunc_trunc_of_is_trunc,
apply is_contr_loop_of_is_trunc,
apply @is_trunc_of_le A n _,
apply trunc_index.le_of_succ_le_succ,
rewrite [succ_sub_two_succ k],
exact of_nat_le_of_nat H,
end
theorem trivial_ghomotopy_group_of_is_trunc (A : Type*) (n k : ℕ) [is_trunc n A] (H : n ≤ k)
: is_contr (πg[k+1] A) :=
trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc A (lt_succ_of_le H)
-- Lemma 8.3.2
theorem trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_conn (A : Type*) {k n : ℕ} (H : k ≤ n) [is_conn n A]
: is_contr (π[k] A) :=
begin
have H3 : is_contr (ptrunc k A), from is_conn_of_le A (of_nat_le_of_nat H),
have H4 : is_contr (Ω[k](ptrunc k A)), from !is_trunc_loop_of_is_trunc,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev,
{ apply equiv_of_pequiv (homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc k A)}
end
-- Corollary 8.3.3
section
open sphere sphere.ops sphere_index
theorem homotopy_group_sphere_le (n k : ℕ) (H : k < n) : is_contr (π[k] (S* n)) :=
begin
cases n with n,
{ exfalso, apply not_lt_zero, exact H},
{ have H2 : k ≤ n, from le_of_lt_succ H,
apply @(trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_conn _ H2) }
end
end
theorem is_contr_HG_fiber_of_is_connected {A B : Type*} (k n : ℕ) (f : A →* B)
[H : is_conn_fun n f] (H2 : k ≤ n) : is_contr (π[k] (pfiber f)) :=
@(trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_conn (pfiber f) H2) (H pt)
theorem homotopy_group_trunc_of_le (A : Type*) (n k : ℕ) (H : k ≤ n)
: π[k] (ptrunc n A) ≃* π[k] A :=
begin
refine !homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc ⬝e* _,
refine loopn_pequiv_loopn _ (ptrunc_ptrunc_pequiv_left _ _) ⬝e* _,
exact of_nat_le_of_nat H,
exact !homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc⁻¹ᵉ*,
end
/- Corollaries of the LES of homotopy groups -/
local attribute ab_group.to_group [coercion]
local attribute is_equiv_tinverse [instance]
open prod chain_complex group fin equiv function is_equiv lift
/-
Because of the construction of the LES this proof only gives us this result when
A and B live in the same universe (because Lean doesn't have universe cumulativity).
However, below we also proof that it holds for A and B in arbitrary universes.
-/
theorem is_equiv_π_of_is_connected'.{u} {A B : pType.{u}} {n k : ℕ} (f : A →* B)
(H2 : k ≤ n) [H : is_conn_fun n f] : is_equiv (π→[k] f) :=
begin
cases k with k,
{ /- k = 0 -/
change (is_equiv (trunc_functor 0 f)), apply is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun,
refine is_conn_fun_of_le f (zero_le_of_nat n)},
{ /- k > 0 -/
have H2' : k ≤ n, from le.trans !self_le_succ H2,
exact
@is_equiv_of_trivial _
(LES_of_homotopy_groups f) _
(is_exact_LES_of_homotopy_groups f (k, 2))
(is_exact_LES_of_homotopy_groups f (succ k, 0))
(@is_contr_HG_fiber_of_is_connected A B k n f H H2')
(@is_contr_HG_fiber_of_is_connected A B (succ k) n f H H2)
(@pgroup_of_group _ (group_LES_of_homotopy_groups f k 0) idp)
(@pgroup_of_group _ (group_LES_of_homotopy_groups f k 1) idp)
(homomorphism.struct (homomorphism_LES_of_homotopy_groups_fun f (k, 0)))},
end
theorem is_equiv_π_of_is_connected.{u v} {A : pType.{u}} {B : pType.{v}} {n k : ℕ} (f : A →* B)
(H2 : k ≤ n) [H : is_conn_fun n f] : is_equiv (π→[k] f) :=
begin
have π→[k] pdown.{v u} ∘* π→[k] (plift_functor f) ∘* π→[k] pup.{u v} ~* π→[k] f,
begin
refine pwhisker_left _ !homotopy_group_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
refine !homotopy_group_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
apply homotopy_group_functor_phomotopy, apply plift_functor_phomotopy
end,
have π→[k] pdown.{v u} ∘ π→[k] (plift_functor f) ∘ π→[k] pup.{u v} ~ π→[k] f, from this,
apply is_equiv.homotopy_closed, rotate 1,
{ exact this},
{ do 2 apply is_equiv_compose,
{ apply is_equiv_homotopy_group_functor, apply to_is_equiv !equiv_lift},
{ refine @(is_equiv_π_of_is_connected' _ H2) _, apply is_conn_fun_lift_functor},
{ apply is_equiv_homotopy_group_functor, apply to_is_equiv !equiv_lift⁻¹ᵉ}}
end
definition π_equiv_π_of_is_connected {A B : Type*} {n k : ℕ} (f : A →* B)
(H2 : k ≤ n) [H : is_conn_fun n f] : π[k] A ≃* π[k] B :=
pequiv_of_pmap (π→[k] f) (is_equiv_π_of_is_connected f H2)
-- TODO: prove this for A and B in different universe levels
theorem is_surjective_π_of_is_connected.{u} {A B : pType.{u}} (n : ℕ) (f : A →* B)
[H : is_conn_fun n f] : is_surjective (π→[n + 1] f) :=
@is_surjective_of_trivial _
(LES_of_homotopy_groups f) _
(is_exact_LES_of_homotopy_groups f (n, 2))
(@is_contr_HG_fiber_of_is_connected A B n n f H !le.refl)
/-
Theorem 8.8.3: Whitehead's principle and its corollaries
-/
definition whitehead_principle (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type}
[HA : is_trunc n A] [HB : is_trunc n B] (f : A → B) (H' : is_equiv (trunc_functor 0 f))
(H : Πa k, is_equiv (π→[k + 1] (pmap_of_map f a))) : is_equiv f :=
begin
revert A B HA HB f H' H, induction n with n IH: intros,
{ apply is_equiv_of_is_contr},
have Πa, is_equiv (Ω→ (pmap_of_map f a)),
begin
intro a,
apply IH, do 2 (esimp; exact _),
{ rexact H a 0},
intro p k,
have is_equiv (π→[k + 1] (Ω→(pmap_of_map f a))),
from is_equiv_homotopy_group_functor_ap1 (k+1) (pmap_of_map f a),
have Π(b : A) (p : a = b),
is_equiv (pmap.to_fun (π→[k + 1] (pmap_of_map (ap f) p))),
begin
intro b p, induction p, apply is_equiv.homotopy_closed, exact this,
refine homotopy_group_functor_phomotopy _ _,
apply ap1_pmap_of_map
end,
have is_equiv (homotopy_group_pequiv _
(pequiv_of_eq_pt (!idp_con⁻¹ : ap f p = Ω→ (pmap_of_map f a) p)) ∘
pmap.to_fun (π→[k + 1] (pmap_of_map (ap f) p))),
begin
apply is_equiv_compose, exact this a p,
end,
apply is_equiv.homotopy_closed, exact this,
refine !homotopy_group_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
apply homotopy_group_functor_phomotopy,
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ esimp, intro q, refine !idp_con⁻¹},
{ esimp, refine !idp_con⁻¹},
end,
apply is_equiv_of_is_equiv_ap1_of_is_equiv_trunc
end
definition whitehead_principle_pointed (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type*}
[HA : is_trunc n A] [HB : is_trunc n B] [is_conn 0 A] (f : A →* B)
(H : Πk, is_equiv (π→[k] f)) : is_equiv f :=
begin
apply whitehead_principle n, rexact H 0,
intro a k, revert a, apply is_conn.elim -1,
have is_equiv (π→[k + 1] (pointed_eta_pequiv B ⬝e* (pequiv_of_eq_pt (respect_pt f))⁻¹ᵉ*)
∘* π→[k + 1] f ∘* π→[k + 1] (pointed_eta_pequiv A)⁻¹ᵉ*),
begin
apply is_equiv_compose
(π→[k + 1] (pointed_eta_pequiv B ⬝e* (pequiv_of_eq_pt (respect_pt f))⁻¹ᵉ*)),
apply is_equiv_compose (π→[k + 1] f),
all_goals apply is_equiv_homotopy_group_functor,
end,
refine @(is_equiv.homotopy_closed _) _ this _,
apply to_homotopy,
refine pwhisker_left _ !homotopy_group_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
refine !homotopy_group_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
apply homotopy_group_functor_phomotopy, apply phomotopy_pmap_of_map
end
open pointed.ops
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [is_trunc n A] [is_conn 0 A]
(H : Πk a, is_contr (π[k] (pointed.MK A a))) : is_contr A :=
begin
fapply is_trunc_is_equiv_closed_rev, { exact λa, ⋆},
apply whitehead_principle n,
{ apply is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun, apply is_conn_fun_to_unit_of_is_conn},
intro a k,
apply @is_equiv_of_is_contr,
refine trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ !zero_lt_succ,
end
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat (n : ℕ) (A : Type) [is_trunc n A] [is_conn 0 A]
(H : Πk a, k ≤ n → is_contr (π[k] (pointed.MK A a))) : is_contr A :=
begin
apply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy n,
intro k a, apply @lt_ge_by_cases _ _ n k,
{ intro H', exact trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ H'},
{ intro H', exact H k a H'}
end
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_pointed (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) [is_trunc n A]
(H : Πk, is_contr (π[k] A)) : is_contr A :=
begin
have is_conn 0 A, proof H 0 qed,
fapply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy n A,
intro k, apply is_conn.elim -1,
cases A with A a, exact H k
end
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat_pointed (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) [is_trunc n A]
(H : Πk, k ≤ n → is_contr (π[k] A)) : is_contr A :=
begin
have is_conn 0 A, proof H 0 !zero_le qed,
fapply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat n A,
intro k a H', revert a, apply is_conn.elim -1,
cases A with A a, exact H k H'
end
definition is_conn_fun_of_equiv_on_homotopy_groups.{u} (n : ℕ) {A B : Type.{u}} (f : A → B)
[is_equiv (trunc_functor 0 f)]
(H1 : Πa k, k ≤ n → is_equiv (homotopy_group_functor k (pmap_of_map f a)))
(H2 : Πa, is_surjective (homotopy_group_functor (succ n) (pmap_of_map f a))) : is_conn_fun n f :=
have H2' : Πa k, k ≤ n → is_surjective (homotopy_group_functor (succ k) (pmap_of_map f a)),
begin
intro a k H, cases H with n' H',
{ apply H2},
{ apply is_surjective_of_is_equiv, apply H1, exact succ_le_succ H'}
end,
have H3 : Πa, is_contr (ptrunc n (pfiber (pmap_of_map f a))),
begin
intro a, apply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat_pointed n,
{ intro k H, apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev, exact homotopy_group_ptrunc_of_le H _,
rexact @is_contr_of_is_embedding_of_is_surjective +3ℕ
(LES_of_homotopy_groups (pmap_of_map f a)) (k, 0)
(is_exact_LES_of_homotopy_groups _ _)
proof @(is_embedding_of_is_equiv _) (H1 a k H) qed
proof (H2' a k H) qed}
end,
show Πb, is_contr (trunc n (fiber f b)),
begin
intro b,
note p := right_inv (trunc_functor 0 f) (tr b), revert p,
induction (trunc_functor 0 f)⁻¹ (tr b), esimp, intro p,
induction !tr_eq_tr_equiv p with q,
rewrite -q, exact H3 a
end
end is_trunc
open is_trunc function
/- applications to infty-connected types and maps -/
namespace is_conn
definition is_conn_fun_inf_of_equiv_on_homotopy_groups.{u} {A B : Type.{u}} (f : A → B)
[is_equiv (trunc_functor 0 f)]
(H1 : Πa k, is_equiv (homotopy_group_functor k (pmap_of_map f a))) : is_conn_fun_inf f :=
begin
apply is_conn_fun_inf.mk_nat, intro n, apply is_conn_fun_of_equiv_on_homotopy_groups,
{ intro a k H, exact H1 a k},
{ intro a, apply is_surjective_of_is_equiv}
end
definition is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun_inf.{u} (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type.{u}} (f : A → B)
[is_conn_fun_inf f] : is_equiv (trunc_functor n f) :=
_
definition is_equiv_homotopy_group_functor_of_is_conn_fun_inf.{u} {A B : pType.{u}} (f : A →* B)
[is_conn_fun_inf f] (a : A) (k : ℕ) : is_equiv (homotopy_group_functor k f) :=
is_equiv_π_of_is_connected f (le.refl k)
end is_conn
|
ca35ea672f127d935fe5be0d4ead4aefa7c2e778 | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/algebraic_geometry/prime_spectrum.lean | e6223fb1da68219524f40bfdf417481b6eb741ba | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,181 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import topology.opens
import ring_theory.ideal.prod
import linear_algebra.finsupp
import algebra.punit_instances
/-!
# Prime spectrum of a commutative ring
The prime spectrum of a commutative ring is the type of all prime ideals.
It is naturally endowed with a topology: the Zariski topology.
(It is also naturally endowed with a sheaf of rings,
which is constructed in `algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf`.)
## Main definitions
* `prime_spectrum R`: The prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R`,
i.e., the set of all prime ideals of `R`.
* `zero_locus s`: The zero locus of a subset `s` of `R`
is the subset of `prime_spectrum R` consisting of all prime ideals that contain `s`.
* `vanishing_ideal t`: The vanishing ideal of a subset `t` of `prime_spectrum R`
is the intersection of points in `t` (viewed as prime ideals).
## Conventions
We denote subsets of rings with `s`, `s'`, etc...
whereas we denote subsets of prime spectra with `t`, `t'`, etc...
## Inspiration/contributors
The contents of this file draw inspiration from
<https://github.com/ramonfmir/lean-scheme>
which has contributions from Ramon Fernandez Mir, Kevin Buzzard, Kenny Lau,
and Chris Hughes (on an earlier repository).
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
universe variables u v
variables (R : Type u) [comm_ring R]
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R`
is the type of all prime ideals of `R`.
It is naturally endowed with a topology (the Zariski topology),
and a sheaf of commutative rings (see `algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf`).
It is a fundamental building block in algebraic geometry. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def prime_spectrum := {I : ideal R // I.is_prime}
variable {R}
namespace prime_spectrum
/-- A method to view a point in the prime spectrum of a commutative ring
as an ideal of that ring. -/
abbreviation as_ideal (x : prime_spectrum R) : ideal R := x.val
instance is_prime (x : prime_spectrum R) :
x.as_ideal.is_prime := x.2
/--
The prime spectrum of the zero ring is empty.
-/
lemma punit (x : prime_spectrum punit) : false :=
x.1.ne_top_iff_one.1 x.2.1 $ subsingleton.elim (0 : punit) 1 ▸ x.1.zero_mem
section
variables (R) (S : Type v) [comm_ring S]
/-- The prime spectrum of `R × S` is in bijection with the disjoint unions of the prime spectrum of
`R` and the prime spectrum of `S`. -/
noncomputable def prime_spectrum_prod :
prime_spectrum (R × S) ≃ prime_spectrum R ⊕ prime_spectrum S :=
ideal.prime_ideals_equiv R S
variables {R S}
@[simp] lemma prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inl_as_ideal (x : prime_spectrum R) :
((prime_spectrum_prod R S).symm (sum.inl x)).as_ideal = ideal.prod x.as_ideal ⊤ :=
by { cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inr_as_ideal (x : prime_spectrum S) :
((prime_spectrum_prod R S).symm (sum.inr x)).as_ideal = ideal.prod ⊤ x.as_ideal :=
by { cases x, refl }
end
@[ext] lemma ext {x y : prime_spectrum R} :
x = y ↔ x.as_ideal = y.as_ideal :=
subtype.ext_iff_val
/-- The zero locus of a set `s` of elements of a commutative ring `R`
is the set of all prime ideals of the ring that contain the set `s`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function
on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal)
the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring `R` modulo the prime ideal `x`.
In this manner, `zero_locus s` is exactly the subset of `prime_spectrum R`
where all "functions" in `s` vanish simultaneously.
-/
def zero_locus (s : set R) : set (prime_spectrum R) :=
{x | s ⊆ x.as_ideal}
@[simp] lemma mem_zero_locus (x : prime_spectrum R) (s : set R) :
x ∈ zero_locus s ↔ s ⊆ x.as_ideal := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_span (s : set R) :
zero_locus (ideal.span s : set R) = zero_locus s :=
by { ext x, exact (submodule.gi R R).gc s x.as_ideal }
/-- The vanishing ideal of a set `t` of points
of the prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R`
is the intersection of all the prime ideals in the set `t`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function
on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal)
the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring `R` modulo the prime ideal `x`.
In this manner, `vanishing_ideal t` is exactly the ideal of `R`
consisting of all "functions" that vanish on all of `t`.
-/
def vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) : ideal R :=
⨅ (x : prime_spectrum R) (h : x ∈ t), x.as_ideal
lemma coe_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
(vanishing_ideal t : set R) = {f : R | ∀ x : prime_spectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.as_ideal} :=
begin
ext f,
rw [vanishing_ideal, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_infi],
apply forall_congr, intro x,
rw [submodule.mem_infi],
end
lemma mem_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) (f : R) :
f ∈ vanishing_ideal t ↔ ∀ x : prime_spectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.as_ideal :=
by rw [← set_like.mem_coe, coe_vanishing_ideal, set.mem_set_of_eq]
@[simp] lemma vanishing_ideal_singleton (x : prime_spectrum R) :
vanishing_ideal ({x} : set (prime_spectrum R)) = x.as_ideal :=
by simp [vanishing_ideal]
lemma subset_zero_locus_iff_le_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) (I : ideal R) :
t ⊆ zero_locus I ↔ I ≤ vanishing_ideal t :=
⟨λ h f k, (mem_vanishing_ideal _ _).mpr (λ x j, (mem_zero_locus _ _).mpr (h j) k), λ h,
λ x j, (mem_zero_locus _ _).mpr (le_trans h (λ f h, ((mem_vanishing_ideal _ _).mp h) x j))⟩
section gc
variable (R)
/-- `zero_locus` and `vanishing_ideal` form a galois connection. -/
lemma gc : @galois_connection
(ideal R) (order_dual (set (prime_spectrum R))) _ _
(λ I, zero_locus I) (λ t, vanishing_ideal t) :=
λ I t, subset_zero_locus_iff_le_vanishing_ideal t I
/-- `zero_locus` and `vanishing_ideal` form a galois connection. -/
lemma gc_set : @galois_connection
(set R) (order_dual (set (prime_spectrum R))) _ _
(λ s, zero_locus s) (λ t, vanishing_ideal t) :=
have ideal_gc : galois_connection (ideal.span) coe := (submodule.gi R R).gc,
by simpa [zero_locus_span, function.comp] using galois_connection.compose _ _ _ _ ideal_gc (gc R)
lemma subset_zero_locus_iff_subset_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) (s : set R) :
t ⊆ zero_locus s ↔ s ⊆ vanishing_ideal t :=
(gc_set R) s t
end gc
lemma subset_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus (s : set R) :
s ⊆ vanishing_ideal (zero_locus s) :=
(gc_set R).le_u_l s
lemma le_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus (I : ideal R) :
I ≤ vanishing_ideal (zero_locus I) :=
(gc R).le_u_l I
@[simp] lemma vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical (I : ideal R) :
vanishing_ideal (zero_locus (I : set R)) = I.radical := ideal.ext $ λ f,
begin
rw [mem_vanishing_ideal, ideal.radical_eq_Inf, submodule.mem_Inf],
exact ⟨(λ h x hx, h ⟨x, hx.2⟩ hx.1), (λ h x hx, h x.1 ⟨hx, x.2⟩)⟩
end
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_radical (I : ideal R) : zero_locus (I.radical : set R) = zero_locus I :=
vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical I ▸ congr_fun (gc R).l_u_l_eq_l I
lemma subset_zero_locus_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
t ⊆ zero_locus (vanishing_ideal t) :=
(gc R).l_u_le t
lemma zero_locus_anti_mono {s t : set R} (h : s ⊆ t) : zero_locus t ⊆ zero_locus s :=
(gc_set R).monotone_l h
lemma zero_locus_anti_mono_ideal {s t : ideal R} (h : s ≤ t) :
zero_locus (t : set R) ⊆ zero_locus (s : set R) :=
(gc R).monotone_l h
lemma vanishing_ideal_anti_mono {s t : set (prime_spectrum R)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
vanishing_ideal t ≤ vanishing_ideal s :=
(gc R).monotone_u h
lemma zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_iff (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus (I : set R) ⊆ zero_locus (J : set R) ↔ J ≤ I.radical :=
⟨λ h, ideal.radical_le_radical_iff.mp (vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical I ▸
vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical J ▸ vanishing_ideal_anti_mono h),
λ h, zero_locus_radical I ▸ zero_locus_anti_mono_ideal h⟩
lemma zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_singleton_iff (f g : R) :
zero_locus ({f} : set R) ⊆ zero_locus {g} ↔ g ∈ (ideal.span ({f} : set R)).radical :=
by rw [← zero_locus_span {f}, ← zero_locus_span {g}, zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_iff,
ideal.span_le, set.singleton_subset_iff, set_like.mem_coe]
lemma zero_locus_bot :
zero_locus ((⊥ : ideal R) : set R) = set.univ :=
(gc R).l_bot
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_singleton_zero :
zero_locus ({0} : set R) = set.univ :=
zero_locus_bot
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_empty :
zero_locus (∅ : set R) = set.univ :=
(gc_set R).l_bot
@[simp] lemma vanishing_ideal_univ :
vanishing_ideal (∅ : set (prime_spectrum R)) = ⊤ :=
by simpa using (gc R).u_top
lemma zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem {s : set R} (h : (1:R) ∈ s) :
zero_locus s = ∅ :=
begin
rw set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
intros x hx,
rw mem_zero_locus at hx,
have x_prime : x.as_ideal.is_prime := by apply_instance,
have eq_top : x.as_ideal = ⊤, { rw ideal.eq_top_iff_one, exact hx h },
apply x_prime.ne_top eq_top,
end
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_singleton_one :
zero_locus ({1} : set R) = ∅ :=
zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem (set.mem_singleton (1 : R))
lemma zero_locus_empty_iff_eq_top {I : ideal R} :
zero_locus (I : set R) = ∅ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
begin
split,
{ contrapose!,
intro h,
apply set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty.mpr,
rcases ideal.exists_le_maximal I h with ⟨M, hM, hIM⟩,
exact ⟨⟨M, hM.is_prime⟩, hIM⟩ },
{ rintro rfl, apply zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem, trivial }
end
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_univ :
zero_locus (set.univ : set R) = ∅ :=
zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem (set.mem_univ 1)
lemma zero_locus_sup (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus ((I ⊔ J : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I ∩ zero_locus J :=
(gc R).l_sup
lemma zero_locus_union (s s' : set R) :
zero_locus (s ∪ s') = zero_locus s ∩ zero_locus s' :=
(gc_set R).l_sup
lemma vanishing_ideal_union (t t' : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal (t ∪ t') = vanishing_ideal t ⊓ vanishing_ideal t' :=
(gc R).u_inf
lemma zero_locus_supr {ι : Sort*} (I : ι → ideal R) :
zero_locus ((⨆ i, I i : ideal R) : set R) = (⋂ i, zero_locus (I i)) :=
(gc R).l_supr
lemma zero_locus_Union {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → set R) :
zero_locus (⋃ i, s i) = (⋂ i, zero_locus (s i)) :=
(gc_set R).l_supr
lemma zero_locus_bUnion (s : set (set R)) :
zero_locus (⋃ s' ∈ s, s' : set R) = ⋂ s' ∈ s, zero_locus s' :=
by simp only [zero_locus_Union]
lemma vanishing_ideal_Union {ι : Sort*} (t : ι → set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal (⋃ i, t i) = (⨅ i, vanishing_ideal (t i)) :=
(gc R).u_infi
lemma zero_locus_inf (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus ((I ⊓ J : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I ∪ zero_locus J :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.inf_le
lemma union_zero_locus (s s' : set R) :
zero_locus s ∪ zero_locus s' = zero_locus ((ideal.span s) ⊓ (ideal.span s') : ideal R) :=
by { rw zero_locus_inf, simp }
lemma zero_locus_mul (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus ((I * J : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I ∪ zero_locus J :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.mul_le
lemma zero_locus_singleton_mul (f g : R) :
zero_locus ({f * g} : set R) = zero_locus {f} ∪ zero_locus {g} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_pow (I : ideal R) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
zero_locus ((I ^ n : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I :=
zero_locus_radical (I ^ n) ▸ (I.radical_pow n hn).symm ▸ zero_locus_radical I
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_singleton_pow (f : R) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
zero_locus ({f ^ n} : set R) = zero_locus {f} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.pow_mem_iff_mem n hn
lemma sup_vanishing_ideal_le (t t' : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal t ⊔ vanishing_ideal t' ≤ vanishing_ideal (t ∩ t') :=
begin
intros r,
rw [submodule.mem_sup, mem_vanishing_ideal],
rintro ⟨f, hf, g, hg, rfl⟩ x ⟨hxt, hxt'⟩,
rw mem_vanishing_ideal at hf hg,
apply submodule.add_mem; solve_by_elim
end
lemma mem_compl_zero_locus_iff_not_mem {f : R} {I : prime_spectrum R} :
I ∈ (zero_locus {f} : set (prime_spectrum R))ᶜ ↔ f ∉ I.as_ideal :=
by rw [set.mem_compl_eq, mem_zero_locus, set.singleton_subset_iff]; refl
/-- The Zariski topology on the prime spectrum of a commutative ring
is defined via the closed sets of the topology:
they are exactly those sets that are the zero locus of a subset of the ring. -/
instance zariski_topology : topological_space (prime_spectrum R) :=
topological_space.of_closed (set.range prime_spectrum.zero_locus)
(⟨set.univ, by simp⟩)
begin
intros Zs h,
rw set.sInter_eq_Inter,
let f : Zs → set R := λ i, classical.some (h i.2),
have hf : ∀ i : Zs, ↑i = zero_locus (f i) := λ i, (classical.some_spec (h i.2)).symm,
simp only [hf],
exact ⟨_, zero_locus_Union _⟩
end
(by { rintro _ _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ ⟨t, rfl⟩, exact ⟨_, (union_zero_locus s t).symm⟩ })
lemma is_open_iff (U : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
is_open U ↔ ∃ s, Uᶜ = zero_locus s :=
by simp only [@eq_comm _ Uᶜ]; refl
lemma is_closed_iff_zero_locus (Z : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
is_closed Z ↔ ∃ s, Z = zero_locus s :=
by rw [← is_open_compl_iff, is_open_iff, compl_compl]
lemma is_closed_zero_locus (s : set R) :
is_closed (zero_locus s) :=
by { rw [is_closed_iff_zero_locus], exact ⟨s, rfl⟩ }
lemma zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
zero_locus (vanishing_ideal t : set R) = closure t :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ rintro x hx t' ⟨ht', ht⟩,
obtain ⟨fs, rfl⟩ : ∃ s, t' = zero_locus s,
by rwa [is_closed_iff_zero_locus] at ht',
rw [subset_zero_locus_iff_subset_vanishing_ideal] at ht,
exact set.subset.trans ht hx },
{ rw (is_closed_zero_locus _).closure_subset_iff,
exact subset_zero_locus_vanishing_ideal t }
end
lemma vanishing_ideal_closure (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal (closure t) = vanishing_ideal t :=
zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure t ▸ congr_fun (gc R).u_l_u_eq_u t
section comap
variables {S : Type v} [comm_ring S] {S' : Type*} [comm_ring S']
/-- The function between prime spectra of commutative rings induced by a ring homomorphism.
This function is continuous. -/
def comap (f : R →+* S) : prime_spectrum S → prime_spectrum R :=
λ y, ⟨ideal.comap f y.as_ideal, by exact ideal.is_prime.comap _⟩
variables (f : R →+* S)
@[simp] lemma comap_as_ideal (y : prime_spectrum S) :
(comap f y).as_ideal = ideal.comap f y.as_ideal :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_id : comap (ring_hom.id R) = id :=
funext $ λ _, subtype.ext $ ideal.ext $ λ _, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_comp (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* S') :
comap (g.comp f) = comap f ∘ comap g :=
funext $ λ _, subtype.ext $ ideal.ext $ λ _, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_comap_zero_locus (s : set R) :
(comap f) ⁻¹' (zero_locus s) = zero_locus (f '' s) :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_zero_locus, set.mem_preimage, comap_as_ideal, set.image_subset_iff],
refl
end
lemma comap_continuous (f : R →+* S) : continuous (comap f) :=
begin
rw continuous_iff_is_closed,
simp only [is_closed_iff_zero_locus],
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, preimage_comap_zero_locus f s⟩
end
end comap
section basic_open
/-- `basic_open r` is the open subset containing all prime ideals not containing `r`. -/
def basic_open (r : R) : topological_space.opens (prime_spectrum R) :=
{ val := { x | r ∉ x.as_ideal },
property := ⟨{r}, set.ext $ λ x, set.singleton_subset_iff.trans $ not_not.symm⟩ }
@[simp] lemma mem_basic_open (f : R) (x : prime_spectrum R) :
x ∈ basic_open f ↔ f ∉ x.as_ideal := iff.rfl
lemma is_open_basic_open {a : R} : is_open ((basic_open a) : set (prime_spectrum R)) :=
(basic_open a).property
@[simp] lemma basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl (r : R) :
(basic_open r : set (prime_spectrum R)) = (zero_locus {r})ᶜ :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa only [set.mem_compl_eq, mem_zero_locus, set.singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma basic_open_one : basic_open (1 : R) = ⊤ :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by {simp, refl}
@[simp] lemma basic_open_zero : basic_open (0 : R) = ⊥ :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by {simp, refl}
lemma basic_open_le_basic_open_iff (f g : R) :
basic_open f ≤ basic_open g ↔ f ∈ (ideal.span ({g} : set R)).radical :=
by rw [topological_space.opens.le_def, basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl,
basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl, set.le_eq_subset, set.compl_subset_compl,
zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_singleton_iff]
lemma basic_open_mul (f g : R) : basic_open (f * g) = basic_open f ⊓ basic_open g :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by {simp [zero_locus_singleton_mul]}
lemma basic_open_mul_le_left (f g : R) : basic_open (f * g) ≤ basic_open f :=
by { rw basic_open_mul f g, exact inf_le_left }
lemma basic_open_mul_le_right (f g : R) : basic_open (f * g) ≤ basic_open g :=
by { rw basic_open_mul f g, exact inf_le_right }
@[simp] lemma basic_open_pow (f : R) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : basic_open (f ^ n) = basic_open f :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by simpa using zero_locus_singleton_pow f n hn
lemma is_topological_basis_basic_opens : topological_space.is_topological_basis
(set.range (λ (r : R), (basic_open r : set (prime_spectrum R)))) :=
begin
apply topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds,
{ rintros _ ⟨r, rfl⟩,
exact is_open_basic_open },
{ rintros p U hp ⟨s, hs⟩,
rw [← compl_compl U, set.mem_compl_eq, ← hs, mem_zero_locus, set.not_subset] at hp,
obtain ⟨f, hfs, hfp⟩ := hp,
refine ⟨basic_open f, ⟨f, rfl⟩, hfp, _⟩,
rw [← set.compl_subset_compl, ← hs, basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl, compl_compl],
exact zero_locus_anti_mono (set.singleton_subset_iff.mpr hfs) }
end
lemma is_compact_basic_open (f : R) : is_compact (basic_open f : set (prime_spectrum R)) :=
compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed $ λ ι Z hZc hZ,
begin
let I : ι → ideal R := λ i, vanishing_ideal (Z i),
have hI : ∀ i, Z i = zero_locus (I i) := λ i,
by simpa only [zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure] using (hZc i).closure_eq.symm,
rw [basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl f, set.inter_comm, ← set.diff_eq,
set.diff_eq_empty, funext hI, ← zero_locus_supr] at hZ,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : f ∈ (⨆ (i : ι), I i).radical,
{ rw ← vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical,
apply vanishing_ideal_anti_mono hZ,
exact (subset_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus {f} (set.mem_singleton f)) },
rcases submodule.exists_finset_of_mem_supr I hn with ⟨s, hs⟩,
use s,
-- Using simp_rw here, because `hI` and `zero_locus_supr` need to be applied underneath binders
simp_rw [basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl f, set.inter_comm, ← set.diff_eq,
set.diff_eq_empty, hI, ← zero_locus_supr],
rw ← zero_locus_radical, -- this one can't be in `simp_rw` because it would loop
apply zero_locus_anti_mono,
rw set.singleton_subset_iff,
exact ⟨n, hs⟩
end
end basic_open
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative ring is a compact topological space. -/
instance : compact_space (prime_spectrum R) :=
{ compact_univ := by { convert is_compact_basic_open (1 : R), rw basic_open_one, refl } }
section order
/-!
## The specialization order
We endow `prime_spectrum R` with a partial order,
where `x ≤ y` if and only if `y ∈ closure {x}`.
TODO: maybe define sober topological spaces, and generalise this instance to those
-/
instance : partial_order (prime_spectrum R) :=
subtype.partial_order _
@[simp] lemma as_ideal_le_as_ideal (x y : prime_spectrum R) :
x.as_ideal ≤ y.as_ideal ↔ x ≤ y :=
subtype.coe_le_coe
@[simp] lemma as_ideal_lt_as_ideal (x y : prime_spectrum R) :
x.as_ideal < y.as_ideal ↔ x < y :=
subtype.coe_lt_coe
lemma le_iff_mem_closure (x y : prime_spectrum R) :
x ≤ y ↔ y ∈ closure ({x} : set (prime_spectrum R)) :=
by rw [← as_ideal_le_as_ideal, ← zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure,
mem_zero_locus, vanishing_ideal_singleton, set_like.coe_subset_coe]
end order
end prime_spectrum
|
6228eb006e93be53c75b3a206bcd612ec3e5d1b9 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /tests/lean/run/structure.lean | e674284fd2835a3b58fe1258fe5502841b61eaa5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,193 | lean | import Lean
open Lean
structure S1 :=
(x y : Nat)
structure S2 extends S1 :=
(z : Nat)
structure S3 :=
(w : Nat)
structure S4 extends S2, S3 :=
(s : Nat)
def check (b : Bool) : CoreM Unit :=
«unless» b $ throwError "check failed"
class S5 :=
(x y : Nat)
inductive D
| mk (x y z : Nat) : D
def tst : CoreM Unit :=
do let env ← getEnv;
IO.println (getStructureFields env `Lean.Environment);
check $ getStructureFields env `S4 == #[`toS2, `toS3, `s];
check $ getStructureFields env `S1 == #[`x, `y];
check $ isSubobjectField? env `S4 `toS2 == some `S2;
check $ getParentStructures env `S4 == #[`S2, `S3];
check $ findField? env `S4 `x == some `S1;
check $ findField? env `S4 `x1 == none;
check $ isStructure env `S1;
check $ isStructure env `S2;
check $ isStructure env `S3;
check $ isStructure env `S4;
check $ isStructure env `S5;
check $ !isStructure env `Nat;
check $ !isStructure env `D;
IO.println (getStructureFieldsFlattened env `S4);
IO.println (getStructureFields env `D);
IO.println (getPathToBaseStructure? env `S1 `S4);
check $ getPathToBaseStructure? env `S1 `S4 == some [`S4.toS2, `S2.toS1];
pure ()
#eval tst
|
5e2441454163f36b57ea17b437f106d70f95cf3f | 36c7a18fd72e5b57229bd8ba36493daf536a19ce | /tests/lean/backward_rule1.lean | e5e505dc96b6e2f3034df804324ceb8b1464c2e3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | YHVHvx/lean | 732bf0fb7a298cd7fe0f15d82f8e248c11db49e9 | 038369533e0136dd395dc252084d3c1853accbf2 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,701,080,210 | 1,449,128,595,000 | 1,449,128,595,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 206 | lean | constants (A B C : Prop) (H : A → B) (G : A → B → C)
constants (T : Type) (f : T → A)
attribute H [backward]
attribute G [backward]
attribute f [backward]
print H
print G
print f
print [backward]
|
1b585803c19f267ec1afec3617206b0c4eff41de | 022547453607c6244552158ff25ab3bf17361760 | /src/measure_theory/borel_space.lean | 86c28580f104cab3d0d0f1739137ed740be2ee44 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 1293045656/mathlib | 5f81741a7c1ff1873440ec680b3680bfb6b7b048 | 4709e61525a60189733e72a50e564c58d534bed8 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,010,200,553 | 1,626,245,646,000 | 1,626,245,646,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 65,100 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.ae_measurable_sequence
import analysis.complex.basic
import analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension
import topology.G_delta
import measure_theory.arithmetic
import topology.semicontinuous
import topology.instances.ereal
/-!
# Borel (measurable) space
## Main definitions
* `borel α` : the least `σ`-algebra that contains all open sets;
* `class borel_space` : a space with `topological_space` and `measurable_space` structures
such that `‹measurable_space α› = borel α`;
* `class opens_measurable_space` : a space with `topological_space` and `measurable_space`
structures such that all open sets are measurable; equivalently, `borel α ≤ ‹measurable_space α›`.
* `borel_space` instances on `empty`, `unit`, `bool`, `nat`, `int`, `rat`;
* `measurable` and `borel_space` instances on `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Main statements
* `is_open.measurable_set`, `is_closed.measurable_set`: open and closed sets are measurable;
* `continuous.measurable` : a continuous function is measurable;
* `continuous.measurable2` : if `f : α → β` and `g : α → γ` are measurable and `op : β × γ → δ`
is continuous, then `λ x, op (f x, g y)` is measurable;
* `measurable.add` etc : dot notation for arithmetic operations on `measurable` predicates,
and similarly for `dist` and `edist`;
* `ae_measurable.add` : similar dot notation for almost everywhere measurable functions;
* `measurable.ennreal*` : special cases for arithmetic operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set filter measure_theory
open_locale classical big_operators topological_space nnreal ennreal
universes u v w x y
variables {α β γ γ₂ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : set α}
open measurable_space topological_space
/-- `measurable_space` structure generated by `topological_space`. -/
def borel (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : measurable_space α :=
generate_from {s : set α | is_open s}
lemma borel_eq_top_of_discrete [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] :
borel α = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 $ λ s hs, generate_measurable.basic s (is_open_discrete s)
lemma borel_eq_top_of_encodable [topological_space α] [t1_space α] [encodable α] :
borel α = ⊤ :=
begin
refine (top_le_iff.1 $ λ s hs, bUnion_of_singleton s ▸ _),
apply measurable_set.bUnion s.countable_encodable,
intros x hx,
apply measurable_set.of_compl,
apply generate_measurable.basic,
exact is_closed_singleton.is_open_compl
end
lemma borel_eq_generate_from_of_subbasis {s : set (set α)}
[t : topological_space α] [second_countable_topology α] (hs : t = generate_from s) :
borel α = generate_from s :=
le_antisymm
(generate_from_le $ assume u (hu : t.is_open u),
begin
rw [hs] at hu,
induction hu,
case generate_open.basic : u hu
{ exact generate_measurable.basic u hu },
case generate_open.univ
{ exact @measurable_set.univ α (generate_from s) },
case generate_open.inter : s₁ s₂ _ _ hs₁ hs₂
{ exact @measurable_set.inter α (generate_from s) _ _ hs₁ hs₂ },
case generate_open.sUnion : f hf ih {
rcases is_open_sUnion_countable f (by rwa hs) with ⟨v, hv, vf, vu⟩,
rw ← vu,
exact @measurable_set.sUnion α (generate_from s) _ hv
(λ x xv, ih _ (vf xv)) }
end)
(generate_from_le $ assume u hu, generate_measurable.basic _ $
show t.is_open u, by rw [hs]; exact generate_open.basic _ hu)
lemma topological_space.is_topological_basis.borel_eq_generate_from [topological_space α]
[second_countable_topology α] {s : set (set α)} (hs : is_topological_basis s) :
borel α = generate_from s :=
borel_eq_generate_from_of_subbasis hs.eq_generate_from
lemma is_pi_system_is_open [topological_space α] : is_pi_system (is_open : set α → Prop) :=
λ s t hs ht hst, is_open.inter hs ht
lemma borel_eq_generate_from_is_closed [topological_space α] :
borel α = generate_from {s | is_closed s} :=
le_antisymm
(generate_from_le $ λ t ht, @measurable_set.of_compl α _ (generate_from {s | is_closed s})
(generate_measurable.basic _ $ is_closed_compl_iff.2 ht))
(generate_from_le $ λ t ht, @measurable_set.of_compl α _ (borel α)
(generate_measurable.basic _ $ is_open_compl_iff.2 ht))
section order_topology
variable (α)
variables [topological_space α] [second_countable_topology α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α]
lemma borel_eq_generate_Iio : borel α = generate_from (range Iio) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (generate_from_le _),
{ rw borel_eq_generate_from_of_subbasis (@order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _),
letI : measurable_space α := measurable_space.generate_from (range Iio),
have H : ∀ a : α, measurable_set (Iio a) := λ a, generate_measurable.basic _ ⟨_, rfl⟩,
refine generate_from_le _, rintro _ ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩; [skip, apply H],
by_cases h : ∃ a', ∀ b, a < b ↔ a' ≤ b,
{ rcases h with ⟨a', ha'⟩,
rw (_ : Ioi a = (Iio a')ᶜ), { exact (H _).compl },
simp [set.ext_iff, ha'] },
{ rcases is_open_Union_countable
(λ a' : {a' : α // a < a'}, {b | a'.1 < b})
(λ a', is_open_lt' _) with ⟨v, ⟨hv⟩, vu⟩,
simp [set.ext_iff] at vu,
have : Ioi a = ⋃ x : v, (Iio x.1.1)ᶜ,
{ simp [set.ext_iff],
refine λ x, ⟨λ ax, _, λ ⟨a', ⟨h, av⟩, ax⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le h ax⟩,
rcases (vu x).2 _ with ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩,
{ exact ⟨a', h₁, le_of_lt h₂⟩ },
refine not_imp_comm.1 (λ h, _) h,
exact ⟨x, λ b, ⟨λ ab, le_of_not_lt (λ h', h ⟨b, ab, h'⟩),
lt_of_lt_of_le ax⟩⟩ },
rw this, resetI,
apply measurable_set.Union,
exact λ _, (H _).compl } },
{ rw forall_range_iff,
intro a,
exact generate_measurable.basic _ is_open_Iio }
end
lemma borel_eq_generate_Ioi : borel α = generate_from (range Ioi) :=
@borel_eq_generate_Iio (order_dual α) _ (by apply_instance : second_countable_topology α) _ _
end order_topology
lemma borel_comap {f : α → β} {t : topological_space β} :
@borel α (t.induced f) = (@borel β t).comap f :=
comap_generate_from.symm
lemma continuous.borel_measurable [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
{f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) :
@measurable α β (borel α) (borel β) f :=
measurable.of_le_map $ generate_from_le $
λ s hs, generate_measurable.basic (f ⁻¹' s) (hs.preimage hf)
/-- A space with `measurable_space` and `topological_space` structures such that
all open sets are measurable. -/
class opens_measurable_space (α : Type*) [topological_space α] [h : measurable_space α] : Prop :=
(borel_le : borel α ≤ h)
/-- A space with `measurable_space` and `topological_space` structures such that
the `σ`-algebra of measurable sets is exactly the `σ`-algebra generated by open sets. -/
class borel_space (α : Type*) [topological_space α] [measurable_space α] : Prop :=
(measurable_eq : ‹measurable_space α› = borel α)
/-- In a `borel_space` all open sets are measurable. -/
@[priority 100]
instance borel_space.opens_measurable {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [measurable_space α]
[borel_space α] : opens_measurable_space α :=
⟨ge_of_eq $ borel_space.measurable_eq⟩
instance subtype.borel_space {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [measurable_space α]
[hα : borel_space α] (s : set α) :
borel_space s :=
⟨by { rw [hα.1, subtype.measurable_space, ← borel_comap], refl }⟩
instance subtype.opens_measurable_space {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [measurable_space α]
[h : opens_measurable_space α] (s : set α) :
opens_measurable_space s :=
⟨by { rw [borel_comap], exact comap_mono h.1 }⟩
section
variables [topological_space α] [measurable_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
[topological_space β] [measurable_space β] [opens_measurable_space β]
[topological_space γ] [measurable_space γ] [borel_space γ]
[topological_space γ₂] [measurable_space γ₂] [borel_space γ₂]
[measurable_space δ]
lemma is_open.measurable_set (h : is_open s) : measurable_set s :=
opens_measurable_space.borel_le _ $ generate_measurable.basic _ h
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_interior : measurable_set (interior s) := is_open_interior.measurable_set
lemma is_Gδ.measurable_set (h : is_Gδ s) : measurable_set s :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨S, hSo, hSc, rfl⟩,
exact measurable_set.sInter hSc (λ t ht, (hSo t ht).measurable_set)
end
lemma measurable_set_of_continuous_at {β} [emetric_space β] (f : α → β) :
measurable_set {x | continuous_at f x} :=
(is_Gδ_set_of_continuous_at f).measurable_set
lemma is_closed.measurable_set (h : is_closed s) : measurable_set s :=
h.is_open_compl.measurable_set.of_compl
lemma is_compact.measurable_set [t2_space α] (h : is_compact s) : measurable_set s :=
h.is_closed.measurable_set
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_closure : measurable_set (closure s) :=
is_closed_closure.measurable_set
lemma measurable_of_is_open {f : δ → γ} (hf : ∀ s, is_open s → measurable_set (f ⁻¹' s)) :
measurable f :=
by { rw [‹borel_space γ›.measurable_eq], exact measurable_generate_from hf }
lemma measurable_of_is_closed {f : δ → γ} (hf : ∀ s, is_closed s → measurable_set (f ⁻¹' s)) :
measurable f :=
begin
apply measurable_of_is_open, intros s hs,
rw [← measurable_set.compl_iff, ← preimage_compl], apply hf, rw [is_closed_compl_iff], exact hs
end
lemma measurable_of_is_closed' {f : δ → γ}
(hf : ∀ s, is_closed s → s.nonempty → s ≠ univ → measurable_set (f ⁻¹' s)) : measurable f :=
begin
apply measurable_of_is_closed, intros s hs,
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with h1 h1, { simp [h1] },
by_cases h2 : s = univ, { simp [h2] },
exact hf s hs h1 h2
end
instance nhds_is_measurably_generated (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_measurably_generated :=
begin
rw [nhds, infi_subtype'],
refine @filter.infi_is_measurably_generated _ _ _ _ (λ i, _),
exact i.2.2.measurable_set.principal_is_measurably_generated
end
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then `𝓝[s] a` is a measurably generated filter for
each `a`. This cannot be an `instance` because it depends on a non-instance `hs : measurable_set s`.
-/
lemma measurable_set.nhds_within_is_measurably_generated {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s)
(a : α) :
(𝓝[s] a).is_measurably_generated :=
by haveI := hs.principal_is_measurably_generated; exact filter.inf_is_measurably_generated _ _
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance opens_measurable_space.to_measurable_singleton_class [t1_space α] :
measurable_singleton_class α :=
⟨λ x, is_closed_singleton.measurable_set⟩
instance pi.opens_measurable_space {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι]
[t' : Π i, topological_space (π i)]
[Π i, measurable_space (π i)] [∀ i, second_countable_topology (π i)]
[∀ i, opens_measurable_space (π i)] :
opens_measurable_space (Π i, π i) :=
begin
constructor,
have : Pi.topological_space =
generate_from {t | ∃(s:Πa, set (π a)) (i : finset ι), (∀a∈i, s a ∈ countable_basis (π a)) ∧
t = pi ↑i s},
{ rw [funext (λ a, @eq_generate_from_countable_basis (π a) _ _), pi_generate_from_eq] },
rw [borel_eq_generate_from_of_subbasis this],
apply generate_from_le,
rintros _ ⟨s, i, hi, rfl⟩,
refine measurable_set.pi i.countable_to_set (λ a ha, is_open.measurable_set _),
rw [eq_generate_from_countable_basis (π a)],
exact generate_open.basic _ (hi a ha)
end
instance prod.opens_measurable_space [second_countable_topology α] [second_countable_topology β] :
opens_measurable_space (α × β) :=
begin
constructor,
rw [((is_basis_countable_basis α).prod (is_basis_countable_basis β)).borel_eq_generate_from],
apply generate_from_le,
rintros _ ⟨u, v, hu, hv, rfl⟩,
exact (is_open_of_mem_countable_basis hu).measurable_set.prod
(is_open_of_mem_countable_basis hv).measurable_set
end
section preorder
variables [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α] {a b : α}
@[simp, measurability]
lemma measurable_set_Ici : measurable_set (Ici a) := is_closed_Ici.measurable_set
@[simp, measurability]
lemma measurable_set_Iic : measurable_set (Iic a) := is_closed_Iic.measurable_set
@[simp, measurability]
lemma measurable_set_Icc : measurable_set (Icc a b) := is_closed_Icc.measurable_set
instance nhds_within_Ici_is_measurably_generated :
(𝓝[Ici b] a).is_measurably_generated :=
measurable_set_Ici.nhds_within_is_measurably_generated _
instance nhds_within_Iic_is_measurably_generated :
(𝓝[Iic b] a).is_measurably_generated :=
measurable_set_Iic.nhds_within_is_measurably_generated _
instance at_top_is_measurably_generated : (filter.at_top : filter α).is_measurably_generated :=
@filter.infi_is_measurably_generated _ _ _ _ $
λ a, (measurable_set_Ici : measurable_set (Ici a)).principal_is_measurably_generated
instance at_bot_is_measurably_generated : (filter.at_bot : filter α).is_measurably_generated :=
@filter.infi_is_measurably_generated _ _ _ _ $
λ a, (measurable_set_Iic : measurable_set (Iic a)).principal_is_measurably_generated
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [partial_order α] [order_closed_topology α] [second_countable_topology α]
{a b : α}
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_le' : measurable_set {p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2} :=
order_closed_topology.is_closed_le'.measurable_set
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_le {f g : δ → α} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable_set {a | f a ≤ g a} :=
hf.prod_mk hg measurable_set_le'
end partial_order
section linear_order
variables [linear_order α] [order_closed_topology α] {a b : α}
@[simp, measurability]
lemma measurable_set_Iio : measurable_set (Iio a) := is_open_Iio.measurable_set
@[simp, measurability]
lemma measurable_set_Ioi : measurable_set (Ioi a) := is_open_Ioi.measurable_set
@[simp, measurability]
lemma measurable_set_Ioo : measurable_set (Ioo a b) := is_open_Ioo.measurable_set
@[simp, measurability] lemma measurable_set_Ioc : measurable_set (Ioc a b) :=
measurable_set_Ioi.inter measurable_set_Iic
@[simp, measurability] lemma measurable_set_Ico : measurable_set (Ico a b) :=
measurable_set_Ici.inter measurable_set_Iio
instance nhds_within_Ioi_is_measurably_generated :
(𝓝[Ioi b] a).is_measurably_generated :=
measurable_set_Ioi.nhds_within_is_measurably_generated _
instance nhds_within_Iio_is_measurably_generated :
(𝓝[Iio b] a).is_measurably_generated :=
measurable_set_Iio.nhds_within_is_measurably_generated _
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_lt' [second_countable_topology α] : measurable_set {p : α × α | p.1 < p.2} :=
(is_open_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd).measurable_set
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_lt [second_countable_topology α] {f g : δ → α} (hf : measurable f)
(hg : measurable g) : measurable_set {a | f a < g a} :=
hf.prod_mk hg measurable_set_lt'
lemma set.ord_connected.measurable_set (h : ord_connected s) : measurable_set s :=
begin
let u := ⋃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Ioo x y,
have huopen : is_open u := is_open_bUnion (λ x hx, is_open_bUnion (λ y hy, is_open_Ioo)),
have humeas : measurable_set u := huopen.measurable_set,
have hfinite : (s \ u).finite,
{ refine set.finite_of_forall_between_eq_endpoints (s \ u) (λ x hx y hy z hz hxy hyz, _),
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
exact hy.2 (mem_bUnion_iff.mpr ⟨x, hx.1,
mem_bUnion_iff.mpr ⟨z, hz.1, lt_of_le_of_ne hxy h.1, lt_of_le_of_ne hyz h.2⟩⟩) },
have : u ⊆ s :=
bUnion_subset (λ x hx, bUnion_subset (λ y hy, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans (h.out hx hy))),
rw ← union_diff_cancel this,
exact humeas.union hfinite.measurable_set
end
lemma is_preconnected.measurable_set
(h : is_preconnected s) : measurable_set s :=
h.ord_connected.measurable_set
end linear_order
section linear_order
variables [linear_order α] [order_closed_topology α]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_interval {a b : α} : measurable_set (interval a b) :=
measurable_set_Icc
variables [second_countable_topology α]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.max {f g : δ → α} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a, max (f a) (g a)) :=
hf.piecewise (measurable_set_le hg hf) hg
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.max {f g : δ → α} {μ : measure δ}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) : ae_measurable (λ a, max (f a) (g a)) μ :=
⟨λ a, max (hf.mk f a) (hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.max hg.measurable_mk,
eventually_eq.comp₂ hf.ae_eq_mk _ hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.min {f g : δ → α} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a, min (f a) (g a)) :=
hf.piecewise (measurable_set_le hf hg) hg
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.min {f g : δ → α} {μ : measure δ}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) : ae_measurable (λ a, min (f a) (g a)) μ :=
⟨λ a, min (hf.mk f a) (hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.min hg.measurable_mk,
eventually_eq.comp₂ hf.ae_eq_mk _ hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
end linear_order
/-- A continuous function from an `opens_measurable_space` to a `borel_space`
is measurable. -/
lemma continuous.measurable {f : α → γ} (hf : continuous f) :
measurable f :=
hf.borel_measurable.mono opens_measurable_space.borel_le
(le_of_eq $ borel_space.measurable_eq)
/-- A continuous function from an `opens_measurable_space` to a `borel_space`
is ae-measurable. -/
lemma continuous.ae_measurable {f : α → γ} (h : continuous f) (μ : measure α) : ae_measurable f μ :=
h.measurable.ae_measurable
lemma closed_embedding.measurable {f : α → γ} (hf : closed_embedding f) :
measurable f :=
hf.continuous.measurable
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance has_continuous_mul.has_measurable_mul [has_mul γ] [has_continuous_mul γ] :
has_measurable_mul γ :=
{ measurable_const_mul := λ c, (continuous_const.mul continuous_id).measurable,
measurable_mul_const := λ c, (continuous_id.mul continuous_const).measurable }
@[priority 100]
instance has_continuous_sub.has_measurable_sub [has_sub γ] [has_continuous_sub γ] :
has_measurable_sub γ :=
{ measurable_const_sub := λ c, (continuous_const.sub continuous_id).measurable,
measurable_sub_const := λ c, (continuous_id.sub continuous_const).measurable }
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance topological_group.has_measurable_inv [group γ] [topological_group γ] :
has_measurable_inv γ :=
⟨continuous_inv.measurable⟩
@[priority 100]
instance has_continuous_smul.has_measurable_smul {M α} [topological_space M]
[topological_space α] [measurable_space M] [measurable_space α]
[opens_measurable_space M] [borel_space α] [has_scalar M α] [has_continuous_smul M α] :
has_measurable_smul M α :=
⟨λ c, (continuous_const.smul continuous_id).measurable,
λ y, (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).measurable⟩
section homeomorph
/-- A homeomorphism between two Borel spaces is a measurable equivalence.-/
def homeomorph.to_measurable_equiv (h : γ ≃ₜ γ₂) : γ ≃ᵐ γ₂ :=
{ measurable_to_fun := h.continuous_to_fun.measurable,
measurable_inv_fun := h.continuous_inv_fun.measurable,
.. h }
@[simp]
lemma homeomorph.to_measurable_equiv_coe (h : γ ≃ₜ γ₂) : (h.to_measurable_equiv : γ → γ₂) = h :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma homeomorph.to_measurable_equiv_symm_coe (h : γ ≃ₜ γ₂) :
(h.to_measurable_equiv.symm : γ₂ → γ) = h.symm :=
rfl
@[measurability]
lemma homeomorph.measurable (h : α ≃ₜ γ) : measurable h :=
h.continuous.measurable
end homeomorph
lemma measurable_of_continuous_on_compl_singleton [t1_space α] {f : α → γ} (a : α)
(hf : continuous_on f {a}ᶜ) :
measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton a
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf).measurable
lemma continuous.measurable2 [second_countable_topology α] [second_countable_topology β]
{f : δ → α} {g : δ → β} {c : α → β → γ}
(h : continuous (λ p : α × β, c p.1 p.2)) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a, c (f a) (g a)) :=
h.measurable.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma continuous.ae_measurable2 [second_countable_topology α] [second_countable_topology β]
{f : δ → α} {g : δ → β} {c : α → β → γ} {μ : measure δ}
(h : continuous (λ p : α × β, c p.1 p.2)) (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
ae_measurable (λ a, c (f a) (g a)) μ :=
h.measurable.comp_ae_measurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
@[priority 100]
instance has_continuous_inv'.has_measurable_inv [group_with_zero γ] [t1_space γ]
[has_continuous_inv' γ] :
has_measurable_inv γ :=
⟨measurable_of_continuous_on_compl_singleton 0 continuous_on_inv'⟩
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance has_continuous_mul.has_measurable_mul₂ [second_countable_topology γ] [has_mul γ]
[has_continuous_mul γ] : has_measurable_mul₂ γ :=
⟨continuous_mul.measurable⟩
@[priority 100]
instance has_continuous_sub.has_measurable_sub₂ [second_countable_topology γ] [has_sub γ]
[has_continuous_sub γ] : has_measurable_sub₂ γ :=
⟨continuous_sub.measurable⟩
@[priority 100]
instance has_continuous_smul.has_measurable_smul₂ {M α} [topological_space M]
[second_countable_topology M] [measurable_space M] [opens_measurable_space M]
[topological_space α] [second_countable_topology α] [measurable_space α]
[borel_space α] [has_scalar M α] [has_continuous_smul M α] :
has_measurable_smul₂ M α :=
⟨continuous_smul.measurable⟩
end
section borel_space
variables [topological_space α] [measurable_space α] [borel_space α]
[topological_space β] [measurable_space β] [borel_space β]
[topological_space γ] [measurable_space γ] [borel_space γ]
[measurable_space δ]
lemma pi_le_borel_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [Π i, topological_space (π i)]
[Π i, measurable_space (π i)] [∀ i, borel_space (π i)] :
measurable_space.pi ≤ borel (Π i, π i) :=
begin
have : ‹Π i, measurable_space (π i)› = λ i, borel (π i) :=
funext (λ i, borel_space.measurable_eq),
rw [this],
exact supr_le (λ i, comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ (continuous_apply i).borel_measurable)
end
lemma prod_le_borel_prod : prod.measurable_space ≤ borel (α × β) :=
begin
rw [‹borel_space α›.measurable_eq, ‹borel_space β›.measurable_eq],
refine sup_le _ _,
{ exact comap_le_iff_le_map.mpr continuous_fst.borel_measurable },
{ exact comap_le_iff_le_map.mpr continuous_snd.borel_measurable }
end
instance pi.borel_space {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι]
[t' : Π i, topological_space (π i)]
[Π i, measurable_space (π i)] [∀ i, second_countable_topology (π i)]
[∀ i, borel_space (π i)] :
borel_space (Π i, π i) :=
⟨le_antisymm pi_le_borel_pi opens_measurable_space.borel_le⟩
instance prod.borel_space [second_countable_topology α] [second_countable_topology β] :
borel_space (α × β) :=
⟨le_antisymm prod_le_borel_prod opens_measurable_space.borel_le⟩
lemma closed_embedding.measurable_inv_fun [n : nonempty β] {g : β → γ} (hg : closed_embedding g) :
measurable (function.inv_fun g) :=
begin
refine measurable_of_is_closed (λ s hs, _),
by_cases h : classical.choice n ∈ s,
{ rw preimage_inv_fun_of_mem hg.to_embedding.inj h,
exact (hg.closed_iff_image_closed.mp hs).measurable_set.union
hg.closed_range.measurable_set.compl },
{ rw preimage_inv_fun_of_not_mem hg.to_embedding.inj h,
exact (hg.closed_iff_image_closed.mp hs).measurable_set }
end
lemma measurable_comp_iff_of_closed_embedding {f : δ → β} (g : β → γ) (hg : closed_embedding g) :
measurable (g ∘ f) ↔ measurable f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hf, _, λ hf, hg.measurable.comp hf⟩,
apply measurable_of_is_closed, intros s hs,
convert hf (hg.is_closed_map s hs).measurable_set,
rw [@preimage_comp _ _ _ f g, preimage_image_eq _ hg.to_embedding.inj]
end
lemma ae_measurable_comp_iff_of_closed_embedding {f : δ → β} {μ : measure δ}
(g : β → γ) (hg : closed_embedding g) : ae_measurable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ ae_measurable f μ :=
begin
by_cases h : nonempty β,
{ resetI,
refine ⟨λ hf, _, λ hf, hg.measurable.comp_ae_measurable hf⟩,
convert hg.measurable_inv_fun.comp_ae_measurable hf,
ext x,
exact (function.left_inverse_inv_fun hg.to_embedding.inj (f x)).symm },
{ have H : ¬ nonempty δ, by { contrapose! h, exact nonempty.map f h },
simp [(measurable_of_not_nonempty H (g ∘ f)).ae_measurable,
(measurable_of_not_nonempty H f).ae_measurable] }
end
lemma ae_measurable_comp_right_iff_of_closed_embedding {g : α → β} {μ : measure α}
{f : β → δ} (hg : closed_embedding g) :
ae_measurable (f ∘ g) μ ↔ ae_measurable f (measure.map g μ) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, h.comp_measurable hg.measurable⟩,
by_cases hα : nonempty α,
swap, { simp [measure.eq_zero_of_not_nonempty hα μ] },
resetI,
refine ⟨(h.mk _) ∘ (function.inv_fun g), h.measurable_mk.comp hg.measurable_inv_fun, _⟩,
have : μ = measure.map (function.inv_fun g) (measure.map g μ),
by rw [measure.map_map hg.measurable_inv_fun hg.measurable,
(function.left_inverse_inv_fun hg.to_embedding.inj).comp_eq_id, measure.map_id],
rw this at h,
filter_upwards [ae_of_ae_map hg.measurable_inv_fun h.ae_eq_mk,
ae_map_mem_range g hg.closed_range.measurable_set μ],
assume x hx₁ hx₂,
convert hx₁,
exact ((function.left_inverse_inv_fun hg.to_embedding.inj).right_inv_on_range hx₂).symm,
end
section linear_order
variables [linear_order α] [order_topology α] [second_countable_topology α]
lemma measurable_of_Iio {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' Iio x)) : measurable f :=
begin
convert measurable_generate_from _,
exact borel_space.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generate_Iio _),
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩, exact hf x
end
lemma upper_semicontinuous.measurable [topological_space δ] [opens_measurable_space δ]
{f : δ → α} (hf : upper_semicontinuous f) : measurable f :=
measurable_of_Iio (λ y, (hf.is_open_preimage y).measurable_set)
lemma measurable_of_Ioi {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' Ioi x)) : measurable f :=
begin
convert measurable_generate_from _,
exact borel_space.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generate_Ioi _),
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩, exact hf x
end
lemma lower_semicontinuous.measurable [topological_space δ] [opens_measurable_space δ]
{f : δ → α} (hf : lower_semicontinuous f) : measurable f :=
measurable_of_Ioi (λ y, (hf.is_open_preimage y).measurable_set)
lemma measurable_of_Iic {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' Iic x)) : measurable f :=
begin
apply measurable_of_Ioi,
simp_rw [← compl_Iic, preimage_compl, measurable_set.compl_iff],
assumption
end
lemma measurable_of_Ici {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' Ici x)) : measurable f :=
begin
apply measurable_of_Iio,
simp_rw [← compl_Ici, preimage_compl, measurable_set.compl_iff],
assumption
end
lemma measurable.is_lub {ι} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g : δ → α} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i))
(hg : ∀ b, is_lub {a | ∃ i, f i b = a} (g b)) :
measurable g :=
begin
change ∀ b, is_lub (range $ λ i, f i b) (g b) at hg,
rw [‹borel_space α›.measurable_eq, borel_eq_generate_Ioi α],
apply measurable_generate_from,
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩,
simp_rw [set.preimage, mem_Ioi, lt_is_lub_iff (hg _), exists_range_iff, set_of_exists],
exact measurable_set.Union (λ i, hf i (is_open_lt' _).measurable_set)
end
private lemma ae_measurable.is_lub_of_nonempty {ι} (hι : nonempty ι)
{μ : measure δ} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g : δ → α}
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) (hg : ∀ᵐ b ∂μ, is_lub {a | ∃ i, f i b = a} (g b)) :
ae_measurable g μ :=
begin
let p : δ → (ι → α) → Prop := λ x f', is_lub {a | ∃ i, f' i = a} (g x),
let g_seq := λ x, ite (x ∈ ae_seq_set hf p) (g x) (⟨g x⟩ : nonempty α).some,
have hg_seq : ∀ b, is_lub {a | ∃ i, ae_seq hf p i b = a} (g_seq b),
{ intro b,
haveI hα : nonempty α := nonempty.map g ⟨b⟩,
simp only [ae_seq, g_seq],
split_ifs,
{ have h_set_eq : {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), (hf i).mk (f i) b = a} = {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), f i b = a},
{ ext x,
simp_rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, ae_seq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_ae_seq_set hf h], },
rw h_set_eq,
exact ae_seq.fun_prop_of_mem_ae_seq_set hf h, },
{ have h_singleton : {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), hα.some = a} = {hα.some},
{ ext1 x,
exact ⟨λ hx, hx.some_spec.symm, λ hx, ⟨hι.some, hx.symm⟩⟩, },
rw h_singleton,
exact is_lub_singleton, }, },
refine ⟨g_seq, measurable.is_lub (ae_seq.measurable hf p) hg_seq, _⟩,
exact (ite_ae_eq_of_measure_compl_zero g (λ x, (⟨g x⟩ : nonempty α).some) (ae_seq_set hf p)
(ae_seq.measure_compl_ae_seq_set_eq_zero hf hg)).symm,
end
lemma ae_measurable.is_lub {ι} {μ : measure δ} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g : δ → α}
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) (hg : ∀ᵐ b ∂μ, is_lub {a | ∃ i, f i b = a} (g b)) :
ae_measurable g μ :=
begin
by_cases hμ : μ = 0, { rw hμ, exact ae_measurable_zero_measure },
haveI : μ.ae.ne_bot := by simpa [ne_bot_iff],
by_cases hι : nonempty ι, { exact ae_measurable.is_lub_of_nonempty hι hf hg, },
suffices : ∃ x, g =ᵐ[μ] λ y, g x,
by { exact ⟨(λ y, g this.some), measurable_const, this.some_spec⟩, },
have h_empty : ∀ x, {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), f i x = a} = ∅,
{ intro x,
ext1 y,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_empty_eq, iff_false],
exact λ hi, hι (nonempty_of_exists hi), },
simp_rw h_empty at hg,
exact ⟨hg.exists.some, hg.mono (λ y hy, is_lub.unique hy hg.exists.some_spec)⟩,
end
lemma measurable.is_glb {ι} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g : δ → α} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i))
(hg : ∀ b, is_glb {a | ∃ i, f i b = a} (g b)) :
measurable g :=
begin
change ∀ b, is_glb (range $ λ i, f i b) (g b) at hg,
rw [‹borel_space α›.measurable_eq, borel_eq_generate_Iio α],
apply measurable_generate_from,
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩,
simp_rw [set.preimage, mem_Iio, is_glb_lt_iff (hg _), exists_range_iff, set_of_exists],
exact measurable_set.Union (λ i, hf i (is_open_gt' _).measurable_set)
end
private lemma ae_measurable.is_glb_of_nonempty {ι} (hι : nonempty ι)
{μ : measure δ} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g : δ → α}
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) (hg : ∀ᵐ b ∂μ, is_glb {a | ∃ i, f i b = a} (g b)) :
ae_measurable g μ :=
begin
let p : δ → (ι → α) → Prop := λ x f', is_glb {a | ∃ i, f' i = a} (g x),
let g_seq := λ x, ite (x ∈ ae_seq_set hf p) (g x) (⟨g x⟩ : nonempty α).some,
have hg_seq : ∀ b, is_glb {a | ∃ i, ae_seq hf p i b = a} (g_seq b),
{ intro b,
haveI hα : nonempty α := nonempty.map g ⟨b⟩,
simp only [ae_seq, g_seq],
split_ifs,
{ have h_set_eq : {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), (hf i).mk (f i) b = a} = {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), f i b = a},
{ ext x,
simp_rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, ae_seq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_ae_seq_set hf h], },
rw h_set_eq,
exact ae_seq.fun_prop_of_mem_ae_seq_set hf h, },
{ have h_singleton : {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), hα.some = a} = {hα.some},
{ ext1 x,
exact ⟨λ hx, hx.some_spec.symm, λ hx, ⟨hι.some, hx.symm⟩⟩, },
rw h_singleton,
exact is_glb_singleton, }, },
refine ⟨g_seq, measurable.is_glb (ae_seq.measurable hf p) hg_seq, _⟩,
exact (ite_ae_eq_of_measure_compl_zero g (λ x, (⟨g x⟩ : nonempty α).some) (ae_seq_set hf p)
(ae_seq.measure_compl_ae_seq_set_eq_zero hf hg)).symm,
end
lemma ae_measurable.is_glb {ι} {μ : measure δ} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g : δ → α}
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) (hg : ∀ᵐ b ∂μ, is_glb {a | ∃ i, f i b = a} (g b)) :
ae_measurable g μ :=
begin
by_cases hμ : μ = 0, { rw hμ, exact ae_measurable_zero_measure },
haveI : μ.ae.ne_bot := by simpa [ne_bot_iff],
by_cases hι : nonempty ι, { exact ae_measurable.is_glb_of_nonempty hι hf hg, },
suffices : ∃ x, g =ᵐ[μ] λ y, g x,
by { exact ⟨(λ y, g this.some), measurable_const, this.some_spec⟩, },
have h_empty : ∀ x, {a : α | ∃ (i : ι), f i x = a} = ∅,
{ intro x,
ext1 y,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_empty_eq, iff_false],
exact λ hi, hι (nonempty_of_exists hi), },
simp_rw h_empty at hg,
exact ⟨hg.exists.some, hg.mono (λ y hy, is_glb.unique hy hg.exists.some_spec)⟩,
end
end linear_order
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.supr_Prop {α} [measurable_space α] [complete_lattice α]
(p : Prop) {f : δ → α} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ b, ⨆ h : p, f b) :=
classical.by_cases
(assume h : p, begin convert hf, funext, exact supr_pos h end)
(assume h : ¬p, begin convert measurable_const, funext, exact supr_neg h end)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.infi_Prop {α} [measurable_space α] [complete_lattice α]
(p : Prop) {f : δ → α} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ b, ⨅ h : p, f b) :=
classical.by_cases
(assume h : p, begin convert hf, funext, exact infi_pos h end )
(assume h : ¬p, begin convert measurable_const, funext, exact infi_neg h end)
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α] [second_countable_topology α]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_supr {ι} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) :
measurable (λ b, ⨆ i, f i b) :=
measurable.is_lub hf $ λ b, is_lub_supr
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable_supr {ι} {μ : measure δ} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α}
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) :
ae_measurable (λ b, ⨆ i, f i b) μ :=
ae_measurable.is_lub hf $ (ae_of_all μ (λ b, is_lub_supr))
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_infi {ι} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) :
measurable (λ b, ⨅ i, f i b) :=
measurable.is_glb hf $ λ b, is_glb_infi
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable_infi {ι} {μ : measure δ} [encodable ι] {f : ι → δ → α}
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) :
ae_measurable (λ b, ⨅ i, f i b) μ :=
ae_measurable.is_glb hf $ (ae_of_all μ (λ b, is_glb_infi))
lemma measurable_bsupr {ι} (s : set ι) {f : ι → δ → α} (hs : countable s)
(hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) : measurable (λ b, ⨆ i ∈ s, f i b) :=
by { haveI : encodable s := hs.to_encodable, simp only [supr_subtype'],
exact measurable_supr (λ i, hf i) }
lemma ae_measurable_bsupr {ι} {μ : measure δ} (s : set ι) {f : ι → δ → α} (hs : countable s)
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) : ae_measurable (λ b, ⨆ i ∈ s, f i b) μ :=
begin
haveI : encodable s := hs.to_encodable,
simp only [supr_subtype'],
exact ae_measurable_supr (λ i, hf i),
end
lemma measurable_binfi {ι} (s : set ι) {f : ι → δ → α} (hs : countable s)
(hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) : measurable (λ b, ⨅ i ∈ s, f i b) :=
by { haveI : encodable s := hs.to_encodable, simp only [infi_subtype'],
exact measurable_infi (λ i, hf i) }
lemma ae_measurable_binfi {ι} {μ : measure δ} (s : set ι) {f : ι → δ → α} (hs : countable s)
(hf : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) : ae_measurable (λ b, ⨅ i ∈ s, f i b) μ :=
begin
haveI : encodable s := hs.to_encodable,
simp only [infi_subtype'],
exact ae_measurable_infi (λ i, hf i),
end
/-- `liminf` over a general filter is measurable. See `measurable_liminf` for the version over `ℕ`.
-/
lemma measurable_liminf' {ι ι'} {f : ι → δ → α} {u : filter ι} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i))
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → set ι} (hu : u.has_countable_basis p s) (hs : ∀ i, (s i).countable) :
measurable (λ x, liminf u (λ i, f i x)) :=
begin
simp_rw [hu.to_has_basis.liminf_eq_supr_infi],
refine measurable_bsupr _ hu.countable _,
exact λ i, measurable_binfi _ (hs i) hf
end
/-- `limsup` over a general filter is measurable. See `measurable_limsup` for the version over `ℕ`.
-/
lemma measurable_limsup' {ι ι'} {f : ι → δ → α} {u : filter ι} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i))
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → set ι} (hu : u.has_countable_basis p s) (hs : ∀ i, (s i).countable) :
measurable (λ x, limsup u (λ i, f i x)) :=
begin
simp_rw [hu.to_has_basis.limsup_eq_infi_supr],
refine measurable_binfi _ hu.countable _,
exact λ i, measurable_bsupr _ (hs i) hf
end
/-- `liminf` over `ℕ` is measurable. See `measurable_liminf'` for a version with a general filter.
-/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_liminf {f : ℕ → δ → α} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) :
measurable (λ x, liminf at_top (λ i, f i x)) :=
measurable_liminf' hf at_top_countable_basis (λ i, countable_encodable _)
/-- `limsup` over `ℕ` is measurable. See `measurable_limsup'` for a version with a general filter.
-/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_limsup {f : ℕ → δ → α} (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) :
measurable (λ x, limsup at_top (λ i, f i x)) :=
measurable_limsup' hf at_top_countable_basis (λ i, countable_encodable _)
end complete_linear_order
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [second_countable_topology α] [order_topology α]
lemma measurable_cSup {ι} {f : ι → δ → α} {s : set ι} (hs : s.countable)
(hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) (bdd : ∀ x, bdd_above ((λ i, f i x) '' s)) :
measurable (λ x, Sup ((λ i, f i x) '' s)) :=
begin
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with h2s h2s,
{ simp [h2s, measurable_const] },
{ apply measurable_of_Iic, intro y,
simp_rw [preimage, mem_Iic, cSup_le_iff (bdd _) (h2s.image _), ball_image_iff, set_of_forall],
exact measurable_set.bInter hs (λ i hi, measurable_set_le (hf i) measurable_const) }
end
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
/-- Convert a `homeomorph` to a `measurable_equiv`. -/
def homemorph.to_measurable_equiv (h : α ≃ₜ β) : α ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := h.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun := h.continuous_to_fun.measurable,
measurable_inv_fun := h.continuous_inv_fun.measurable }
end borel_space
instance empty.borel_space : borel_space empty := ⟨borel_eq_top_of_discrete.symm⟩
instance unit.borel_space : borel_space unit := ⟨borel_eq_top_of_discrete.symm⟩
instance bool.borel_space : borel_space bool := ⟨borel_eq_top_of_discrete.symm⟩
instance nat.borel_space : borel_space ℕ := ⟨borel_eq_top_of_discrete.symm⟩
instance int.borel_space : borel_space ℤ := ⟨borel_eq_top_of_discrete.symm⟩
instance rat.borel_space : borel_space ℚ := ⟨borel_eq_top_of_encodable.symm⟩
instance real.measurable_space : measurable_space ℝ := borel ℝ
instance real.borel_space : borel_space ℝ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance nnreal.measurable_space : measurable_space ℝ≥0 := subtype.measurable_space
instance nnreal.borel_space : borel_space ℝ≥0 := subtype.borel_space _
instance ennreal.measurable_space : measurable_space ℝ≥0∞ := borel ℝ≥0∞
instance ennreal.borel_space : borel_space ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance ereal.measurable_space : measurable_space ereal := borel ereal
instance ereal.borel_space : borel_space ereal := ⟨rfl⟩
instance complex.measurable_space : measurable_space ℂ := borel ℂ
instance complex.borel_space : borel_space ℂ := ⟨rfl⟩
section metric_space
variables [metric_space α] [measurable_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
variables [measurable_space β] {x : α} {ε : ℝ}
open metric
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_ball : measurable_set (metric.ball x ε) :=
metric.is_open_ball.measurable_set
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_closed_ball : measurable_set (metric.closed_ball x ε) :=
metric.is_closed_ball.measurable_set
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_inf_dist {s : set α} : measurable (λ x, inf_dist x s) :=
(continuous_inf_dist_pt s).measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.inf_dist {f : β → α} (hf : measurable f) {s : set α} :
measurable (λ x, inf_dist (f x) s) :=
measurable_inf_dist.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_inf_nndist {s : set α} : measurable (λ x, inf_nndist x s) :=
(continuous_inf_nndist_pt s).measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.inf_nndist {f : β → α} (hf : measurable f) {s : set α} :
measurable (λ x, inf_nndist (f x) s) :=
measurable_inf_nndist.comp hf
variables [second_countable_topology α]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_dist : measurable (λ p : α × α, dist p.1 p.2) :=
continuous_dist.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.dist {f g : β → α} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ b, dist (f b) (g b)) :=
(@continuous_dist α _).measurable2 hf hg
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_nndist : measurable (λ p : α × α, nndist p.1 p.2) :=
continuous_nndist.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.nndist {f g : β → α} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ b, nndist (f b) (g b)) :=
(@continuous_nndist α _).measurable2 hf hg
end metric_space
section emetric_space
variables [emetric_space α] [measurable_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
variables [measurable_space β] {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
open emetric
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_eball : measurable_set (emetric.ball x ε) :=
emetric.is_open_ball.measurable_set
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_edist_right : measurable (edist x) :=
(continuous_const.edist continuous_id).measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_edist_left : measurable (λ y, edist y x) :=
(continuous_id.edist continuous_const).measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_inf_edist {s : set α} : measurable (λ x, inf_edist x s) :=
continuous_inf_edist.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.inf_edist {f : β → α} (hf : measurable f) {s : set α} :
measurable (λ x, inf_edist (f x) s) :=
measurable_inf_edist.comp hf
variables [second_countable_topology α]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_edist : measurable (λ p : α × α, edist p.1 p.2) :=
continuous_edist.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.edist {f g : β → α} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ b, edist (f b) (g b)) :=
(@continuous_edist α _).measurable2 hf hg
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.edist {f g : β → α} {μ : measure β}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) : ae_measurable (λ a, edist (f a) (g a)) μ :=
(@continuous_edist α _).ae_measurable2 hf hg
end emetric_space
namespace real
open measurable_space measure_theory
lemma borel_eq_generate_from_Ioo_rat :
borel ℝ = generate_from (⋃(a b : ℚ) (h : a < b), {Ioo a b}) :=
is_topological_basis_Ioo_rat.borel_eq_generate_from
lemma measure_ext_Ioo_rat {μ ν : measure ℝ} [locally_finite_measure μ]
(h : ∀ a b : ℚ, μ (Ioo a b) = ν (Ioo a b)) : μ = ν :=
begin
refine measure.ext_of_generate_from_of_cover_subset borel_eq_generate_from_Ioo_rat _
(subset.refl _) _ _ _ _,
{ simp only [is_pi_system, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
rintros _ _ ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂, rfl⟩ ne,
simp only [Ioo_inter_Ioo, sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min, ← rat.cast_max, ← rat.cast_min,
nonempty_Ioo] at ne ⊢,
refine ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩,
assumption_mod_cast },
{ exact countable_Union (λ a, (countable_encodable _).bUnion $ λ _ _, countable_singleton _) },
{ exact is_topological_basis_Ioo_rat.sUnion_eq },
{ simp only [mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
rintros _ ⟨a, b, h, rfl⟩,
refine (measure_mono subset_closure).trans_lt _,
rw [closure_Ioo],
exacts [is_compact_Icc.finite_measure, rat.cast_lt.2 h] },
{ simp only [mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
rintros _ ⟨a, b, hab, rfl⟩,
exact h a b }
end
lemma borel_eq_generate_from_Iio_rat :
borel ℝ = generate_from (⋃ a : ℚ, {Iio a}) :=
begin
let g, swap,
apply le_antisymm (_ : _ ≤ g) (measurable_space.generate_from_le (λ t, _)),
{ rw borel_eq_generate_from_Ioo_rat,
refine generate_from_le (λ t, _),
simp only [mem_Union], rintro ⟨a, b, h, H⟩,
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 H],
rw (set.ext (λ x, _) : Ioo (a : ℝ) b = (⋃c>a, (Iio c)ᶜ) ∩ Iio b),
{ have hg : ∀ q : ℚ, g.measurable_set' (Iio q) :=
λ q, generate_measurable.basic (Iio q) (by { simp, exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ }),
refine @measurable_set.inter _ g _ _ _ (hg _),
refine @measurable_set.bUnion _ _ g _ _ (countable_encodable _) (λ c h, _),
exact @measurable_set.compl _ _ g (hg _) },
{ suffices : x < ↑b → (↑a < x ↔ ∃ (i : ℚ), a < i ∧ ↑i ≤ x), by simpa,
refine λ _, ⟨λ h, _, λ ⟨i, hai, hix⟩, (rat.cast_lt.2 hai).trans_le hix⟩,
rcases exists_rat_btwn h with ⟨c, ac, cx⟩,
exact ⟨c, rat.cast_lt.1 ac, cx.le⟩ } },
{ simp, rintro r rfl, exact is_open_Iio.measurable_set }
end
end real
variable [measurable_space α]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_real_to_nnreal : measurable (real.to_nnreal) :=
nnreal.continuous_of_real.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.real_to_nnreal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, real.to_nnreal (f x)) :=
measurable_real_to_nnreal.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.real_to_nnreal {f : α → ℝ} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, real.to_nnreal (f x)) μ :=
measurable_real_to_nnreal.comp_ae_measurable hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_coe_nnreal_real : measurable (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) :=
nnreal.continuous_coe.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.coe_nnreal_real {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) :=
measurable_coe_nnreal_real.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.coe_nnreal_real {f : α → ℝ≥0} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ :=
measurable_coe_nnreal_real.comp_ae_measurable hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal : measurable (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
ennreal.continuous_coe.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) :=
ennreal.continuous_coe.measurable.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal {f : α → ℝ≥0} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) μ :=
ennreal.continuous_coe.measurable.comp_ae_measurable hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.ennreal_of_real {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, ennreal.of_real (f x)) :=
ennreal.continuous_of_real.measurable.comp hf
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is `measurable_equiv` to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def measurable_equiv.ennreal_equiv_nnreal : {r : ℝ≥0∞ | r ≠ ∞} ≃ᵐ ℝ≥0 :=
ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal.to_measurable_equiv
namespace ennreal
lemma measurable_of_measurable_nnreal {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α}
(h : measurable (λ p : ℝ≥0, f p)) : measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton ∞
(measurable_equiv.ennreal_equiv_nnreal.symm.measurable_coe_iff.1 h)
/-- `ℝ≥0∞` is `measurable_equiv` to `ℝ≥0 ⊕ unit`. -/
def ennreal_equiv_sum : ℝ≥0∞ ≃ᵐ ℝ≥0 ⊕ unit :=
{ measurable_to_fun := measurable_of_measurable_nnreal measurable_inl,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_sum measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal
(@measurable_const ℝ≥0∞ unit _ _ ∞),
.. equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit ℝ≥0 }
open function (uncurry)
lemma measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_prod [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
{f : ℝ≥0∞ × β → γ} (H₁ : measurable (λ p : ℝ≥0 × β, f (p.1, p.2)))
(H₂ : measurable (λ x, f (∞, x))) :
measurable f :=
let e : ℝ≥0∞ × β ≃ᵐ ℝ≥0 × β ⊕ unit × β :=
(ennreal_equiv_sum.prod_congr (measurable_equiv.refl β)).trans
(measurable_equiv.sum_prod_distrib _ _ _) in
e.symm.measurable_coe_iff.1 $ measurable_sum H₁ (H₂.comp measurable_id.snd)
lemma measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_nnreal [measurable_space β]
{f : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ → β} (h₁ : measurable (λ p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0, f (p.1, p.2)))
(h₂ : measurable (λ r : ℝ≥0, f (∞, r))) (h₃ : measurable (λ r : ℝ≥0, f (r, ∞))) :
measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_prod
(measurable_swap_iff.1 $ measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_prod (h₁.comp measurable_swap) h₃)
(measurable_of_measurable_nnreal h₂)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_of_real : measurable ennreal.of_real :=
ennreal.continuous_of_real.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_to_real : measurable ennreal.to_real :=
ennreal.measurable_of_measurable_nnreal measurable_coe_nnreal_real
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_to_nnreal : measurable ennreal.to_nnreal :=
ennreal.measurable_of_measurable_nnreal measurable_id
instance : has_measurable_mul₂ ℝ≥0∞ :=
begin
refine ⟨measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_nnreal _ _ _⟩,
{ simp only [← ennreal.coe_mul, measurable_mul.coe_nnreal_ennreal] },
{ simp only [ennreal.top_mul, ennreal.coe_eq_zero],
exact measurable_const.piecewise (measurable_set_singleton _) measurable_const },
{ simp only [ennreal.mul_top, ennreal.coe_eq_zero],
exact measurable_const.piecewise (measurable_set_singleton _) measurable_const }
end
instance : has_measurable_sub₂ ℝ≥0∞ :=
⟨by apply measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_nnreal;
simp [← ennreal.coe_sub, continuous_sub.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal]⟩
instance : has_measurable_inv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨ennreal.continuous_inv.measurable⟩
end ennreal
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.ennreal_to_nnreal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, (f x).to_nnreal) :=
ennreal.measurable_to_nnreal.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.ennreal_to_nnreal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, (f x).to_nnreal) μ :=
ennreal.measurable_to_nnreal.comp_ae_measurable hf
lemma measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
measurable (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ measurable f :=
⟨λ h, h.ennreal_to_nnreal, λ h, h.coe_nnreal_ennreal⟩
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.ennreal_to_real {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, ennreal.to_real (f x)) :=
ennreal.measurable_to_real.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.ennreal_to_real {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, ennreal.to_real (f x)) μ :=
ennreal.measurable_to_real.comp_ae_measurable hf
/-- note: `ℝ≥0∞` can probably be generalized in a future version of this lemma. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.ennreal_tsum {ι} [encodable ι] {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) :
measurable (λ x, ∑' i, f i x) :=
by { simp_rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum], apply measurable_supr,
exact λ s, s.measurable_sum (λ i _, h i) }
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.nnreal_tsum {ι} [encodable ι] {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) :
measurable (λ x, ∑' i, f i x) :=
begin
simp_rw [nnreal.tsum_eq_to_nnreal_tsum],
exact (measurable.ennreal_tsum (λ i, (h i).coe_nnreal_ennreal)).ennreal_to_nnreal,
end
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.ennreal_tsum {ι} [encodable ι] {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : measure α}
(h : ∀ i, ae_measurable (f i) μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, ∑' i, f i x) μ :=
by { simp_rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum], apply ae_measurable_supr,
exact λ s, finset.ae_measurable_sum s (λ i _, h i) }
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_coe_real_ereal : measurable (coe : ℝ → ereal) :=
continuous_coe_real_ereal.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.coe_real_ereal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, (f x : ereal)) :=
measurable_coe_real_ereal.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.coe_real_ereal {f : α → ℝ} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, (f x : ereal)) μ :=
measurable_coe_real_ereal.comp_ae_measurable hf
/-- The set of finite `ereal` numbers is `measurable_equiv` to `ℝ`. -/
def measurable_equiv.ereal_equiv_real : ({⊥, ⊤} : set ereal).compl ≃ᵐ ℝ :=
ereal.ne_bot_top_homeomorph_real.to_measurable_equiv
lemma ereal.measurable_of_measurable_real {f : ereal → α}
(h : measurable (λ p : ℝ, f p)) : measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite {⊥, ⊤} (by simp)
(measurable_equiv.ereal_equiv_real.symm.measurable_coe_iff.1 h)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_ereal_to_real : measurable ereal.to_real :=
ereal.measurable_of_measurable_real (by simpa using measurable_id)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.ereal_to_real {f : α → ereal} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, (f x).to_real) :=
measurable_ereal_to_real.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.ereal_to_real {f : α → ereal} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, (f x).to_real) μ :=
measurable_ereal_to_real.comp_ae_measurable hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_coe_ennreal_ereal : measurable (coe : ℝ≥0∞ → ereal) :=
continuous_coe_ennreal_ereal.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.coe_ereal_ennreal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ x, (f x : ereal)) :=
measurable_coe_ennreal_ereal.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.coe_ereal_ennreal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, (f x : ereal)) μ :=
measurable_coe_ennreal_ereal.comp_ae_measurable hf
section normed_group
variables [normed_group α] [opens_measurable_space α] [measurable_space β]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_norm : measurable (norm : α → ℝ) :=
continuous_norm.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.norm {f : β → α} (hf : measurable f) : measurable (λ a, norm (f a)) :=
measurable_norm.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.norm {f : β → α} {μ : measure β} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ a, norm (f a)) μ :=
measurable_norm.comp_ae_measurable hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_nnnorm : measurable (nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0) :=
continuous_nnnorm.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.nnnorm {f : β → α} (hf : measurable f) : measurable (λ a, nnnorm (f a)) :=
measurable_nnnorm.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.nnnorm {f : β → α} {μ : measure β} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ a, nnnorm (f a)) μ :=
measurable_nnnorm.comp_ae_measurable hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_ennnorm : measurable (λ x : α, (nnnorm x : ℝ≥0∞)) :=
measurable_nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.ennnorm {f : β → α} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a, (nnnorm (f a) : ℝ≥0∞)) :=
hf.nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.ennnorm {f : β → α} {μ : measure β} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ a, (nnnorm (f a) : ℝ≥0∞)) μ :=
measurable_ennnorm.comp_ae_measurable hf
end normed_group
section limits
variables [measurable_space β] [metric_space β] [borel_space β]
open metric
/-- A limit (over a general filter) of measurable `ℝ≥0` valued functions is measurable.
The assumption `hs` can be dropped using `filter.is_countably_generated.has_antimono_basis`, but we
don't need that case yet. -/
lemma measurable_of_tendsto_nnreal' {ι ι'} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0} {g : α → ℝ≥0} (u : filter ι)
[ne_bot u] (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) (lim : tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) {p : ι' → Prop}
{s : ι' → set ι} (hu : u.has_countable_basis p s) (hs : ∀ i, (s i).countable) : measurable g :=
begin
rw [tendsto_pi] at lim, rw [← measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal_iff],
have : ∀ x, liminf u (λ n, (f n x : ℝ≥0∞)) = (g x : ℝ≥0∞) :=
λ x, ((ennreal.continuous_coe.tendsto (g x)).comp (lim x)).liminf_eq,
simp_rw [← this],
show measurable (λ x, liminf u (λ n, (f n x : ℝ≥0∞))),
exact measurable_liminf' (λ i, (hf i).coe_nnreal_ennreal) hu hs,
end
/-- A sequential limit of measurable `ℝ≥0` valued functions is measurable. -/
lemma measurable_of_tendsto_nnreal {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0} {g : α → ℝ≥0}
(hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) (lim : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 g)) : measurable g :=
measurable_of_tendsto_nnreal' at_top hf lim at_top_countable_basis (λ i, countable_encodable _)
/-- A limit (over a general filter) of measurable functions valued in a metric space is measurable.
The assumption `hs` can be dropped using `filter.is_countably_generated.has_antimono_basis`, but we
don't need that case yet. -/
lemma measurable_of_tendsto_metric' {ι ι'} {f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β}
(u : filter ι) [ne_bot u] (hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) (lim : tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) {p : ι' → Prop}
{s : ι' → set ι} (hu : u.has_countable_basis p s) (hs : ∀ i, (s i).countable) :
measurable g :=
begin
apply measurable_of_is_closed', intros s h1s h2s h3s,
have : measurable (λ x, inf_nndist (g x) s),
{ refine measurable_of_tendsto_nnreal' u (λ i, (hf i).inf_nndist) _ hu hs, swap,
rw [tendsto_pi], rw [tendsto_pi] at lim, intro x,
exact ((continuous_inf_nndist_pt s).tendsto (g x)).comp (lim x) },
have h4s : g ⁻¹' s = (λ x, inf_nndist (g x) s) ⁻¹' {0},
{ ext x, simp [h1s, ← mem_iff_inf_dist_zero_of_closed h1s h2s, ← nnreal.coe_eq_zero] },
rw [h4s], exact this (measurable_set_singleton 0),
end
/-- A sequential limit of measurable functions valued in a metric space is measurable. -/
lemma measurable_of_tendsto_metric {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, measurable (f i)) (lim : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 g)) :
measurable g :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metric' at_top hf lim at_top_countable_basis (λ i, countable_encodable _)
lemma ae_measurable_of_tendsto_metric_ae {μ : measure α} {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β}
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ)
(h_ae_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 (g x))) :
ae_measurable g μ :=
begin
let p : α → (ℕ → β) → Prop := λ x f', filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f' n) (𝓝 (g x)),
let hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x (λ n, f n x), from h_ae_tendsto,
let ae_seq_lim := λ x, ite (x ∈ ae_seq_set hf p) (g x) (⟨f 0 x⟩ : nonempty β).some,
refine ⟨ae_seq_lim, _, (ite_ae_eq_of_measure_compl_zero g (λ x, (⟨f 0 x⟩ : nonempty β).some)
(ae_seq_set hf p) (ae_seq.measure_compl_ae_seq_set_eq_zero hf hp)).symm⟩,
refine measurable_of_tendsto_metric (@ae_seq.measurable α β _ _ _ f μ hf p) _,
refine tendsto_pi.mpr (λ x, _),
simp_rw [ae_seq, ae_seq_lim],
split_ifs with hx,
{ simp_rw ae_seq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_ae_seq_set hf hx,
exact @ae_seq.fun_prop_of_mem_ae_seq_set α β _ _ _ _ _ _ hf x hx, },
{ exact tendsto_const_nhds, },
end
lemma measurable_of_tendsto_metric_ae {μ : measure α} [μ.is_complete] {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β}
(hf : ∀ n, measurable (f n))
(h_ae_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 (g x))) :
measurable g :=
ae_measurable_iff_measurable.mp
(ae_measurable_of_tendsto_metric_ae (λ i, (hf i).ae_measurable) h_ae_tendsto)
lemma measurable_limit_of_tendsto_metric_ae {μ : measure α} {f : ℕ → α → β}
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ)
(h_ae_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : β, filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 l)) :
∃ (f_lim : α → β) (hf_lim_meas : measurable f_lim),
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 (f_lim x)) :=
begin
let p : α → (ℕ → β) → Prop := λ x f', ∃ l : β, filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f' n) (𝓝 l),
have hp_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ ae_seq_set hf p → p x (λ n, f n x),
from λ x hx, ae_seq.fun_prop_of_mem_ae_seq_set hf hx,
have hμ_compl : μ (ae_seq_set hf p)ᶜ = 0,
from ae_seq.measure_compl_ae_seq_set_eq_zero hf h_ae_tendsto,
let f_lim : α → β := λ x, dite (x ∈ ae_seq_set hf p) (λ h, (hp_mem x h).some)
(λ h, (⟨f 0 x⟩ : nonempty β).some),
have hf_lim_conv : ∀ x, x ∈ ae_seq_set hf p → filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 (f_lim x)),
{ intros x hx_conv,
simp only [f_lim, hx_conv, dif_pos],
exact (hp_mem x hx_conv).some_spec, },
have hf_lim : ∀ x, filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, ae_seq hf p n x) (𝓝 (f_lim x)),
{ intros x,
simp only [f_lim, ae_seq],
split_ifs,
{ rw funext (λ n, ae_seq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_ae_seq_set hf h n),
exact (hp_mem x h).some_spec, },
{ exact tendsto_const_nhds, }, },
have h_ae_tendsto_f_lim : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, filter.at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 (f_lim x)),
{ refine le_antisymm (le_of_eq (measure_mono_null _ hμ_compl)) (zero_le _),
exact set.compl_subset_compl.mpr (λ x hx, hf_lim_conv x hx), },
have h_f_lim_meas : measurable f_lim,
from measurable_of_tendsto_metric (ae_seq.measurable hf p) (tendsto_pi.mpr (λ x, hf_lim x)),
exact ⟨f_lim, h_f_lim_meas, h_ae_tendsto_f_lim⟩,
end
end limits
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [measurable_space E]
variables [opens_measurable_space E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F] [measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
@[measurability]
protected lemma measurable (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : measurable L :=
L.continuous.measurable
lemma measurable_comp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) {φ : α → E} (φ_meas : measurable φ) :
measurable (λ (a : α), L (φ a)) :=
L.measurable.comp φ_meas
end continuous_linear_map
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
instance : measurable_space (E →L[𝕜] F) := borel _
instance : borel_space (E →L[𝕜] F) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_apply [measurable_space F] [borel_space F] (x : E) :
measurable (λ f : E →L[𝕜] F, f x) :=
(apply 𝕜 F x).continuous.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_apply' [measurable_space E] [opens_measurable_space E]
[measurable_space F] [borel_space F] :
measurable (λ (x : E) (f : E →L[𝕜] F), f x) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ $ λ f, f.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_coe [measurable_space F] [borel_space F] :
measurable (λ (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E), f x) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ measurable_apply
end continuous_linear_map
section continuous_linear_map_nondiscrete_normed_field
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [measurable_space E] [borel_space E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.apply_continuous_linear_map {φ : α → F →L[𝕜] E} (hφ : measurable φ) (v : F) :
measurable (λ a, φ a v) :=
(continuous_linear_map.apply 𝕜 E v).measurable.comp hφ
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.apply_continuous_linear_map {φ : α → F →L[𝕜] E} {μ : measure α}
(hφ : ae_measurable φ μ) (v : F) : ae_measurable (λ a, φ a v) μ :=
(continuous_linear_map.apply 𝕜 E v).measurable.comp_ae_measurable hφ
end continuous_linear_map_nondiscrete_normed_field
section normed_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [complete_space 𝕜] [measurable_space 𝕜]
variables [borel_space 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [measurable_space E] [borel_space E]
lemma measurable_smul_const {f : α → 𝕜} {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
measurable (λ x, f x • c) ↔ measurable f :=
measurable_comp_iff_of_closed_embedding (λ y : 𝕜, y • c) (closed_embedding_smul_left hc)
lemma ae_measurable_smul_const {f : α → 𝕜} {μ : measure α} {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
ae_measurable (λ x, f x • c) μ ↔ ae_measurable f μ :=
ae_measurable_comp_iff_of_closed_embedding (λ y : 𝕜, y • c) (closed_embedding_smul_left hc)
end normed_space
lemma is_compact.measure_lt_top_of_nhds_within [topological_space α]
{s : set α} {μ : measure α} (h : is_compact s) (hμ : ∀ x ∈ s, μ.finite_at_filter (𝓝[s] x)) :
μ s < ∞ :=
is_compact.induction_on h (by simp) (λ s t hst ht, (measure_mono hst).trans_lt ht)
(λ s t hs ht, (measure_union_le s t).trans_lt (ennreal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩)) hμ
lemma is_compact.measure_lt_top [topological_space α] {s : set α} {μ : measure α}
[locally_finite_measure μ] (h : is_compact s) :
μ s < ∞ :=
h.measure_lt_top_of_nhds_within $ λ x hx, μ.finite_at_nhds_within _ _
|
3f4fa6d320ed7c73bf8f93564ecbf3d376167cfa | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/linear_algebra/trace.lean | c164ee18444f2bb539764ef096ef9289e243d927 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,305 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Antoine Labelle
-/
import linear_algebra.matrix.to_lin
import linear_algebra.matrix.trace
import linear_algebra.contraction
import linear_algebra.tensor_product_basis
import linear_algebra.free_module.strong_rank_condition
import linear_algebra.free_module.finite.rank
import linear_algebra.projection
/-!
# Trace of a linear map
This file defines the trace of a linear map.
See also `linear_algebra/matrix/trace.lean` for the trace of a matrix.
## Tags
linear_map, trace, diagonal
-/
noncomputable theory
universes u v w
namespace linear_map
open_locale big_operators
open_locale matrix
open finite_dimensional
open_locale tensor_product
section
variables (R : Type u) [comm_semiring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
variables {ι : Type w} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι]
variables {κ : Type*} [decidable_eq κ] [fintype κ]
variables (b : basis ι R M) (c : basis κ R M)
/-- The trace of an endomorphism given a basis. -/
def trace_aux :
(M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
(matrix.trace_linear_map ι R R) ∘ₗ ↑(linear_map.to_matrix b b)
-- Can't be `simp` because it would cause a loop.
lemma trace_aux_def (b : basis ι R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace_aux R b f = matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix b b f) :=
rfl
theorem trace_aux_eq : trace_aux R b = trace_aux R c :=
linear_map.ext $ λ f,
calc matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix b b f)
= matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix b b ((linear_map.id.comp f).comp linear_map.id)) :
by rw [linear_map.id_comp, linear_map.comp_id]
... = matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix c b linear_map.id ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix c c f ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix b c linear_map.id) :
by rw [linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ c, linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ c]
... = matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix c c f ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix b c linear_map.id ⬝
linear_map.to_matrix c b linear_map.id) :
by rw [matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.trace_mul_comm]
... = matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix c c ((f.comp linear_map.id).comp linear_map.id)) :
by rw [linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ b, linear_map.to_matrix_comp _ c]
... = matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix c c f) :
by rw [linear_map.comp_id, linear_map.comp_id]
open_locale classical
variables (R) (M)
/-- Trace of an endomorphism independent of basis. -/
def trace : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s R M)
then trace_aux R H.some_spec.some
else 0
variables (R) {M}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `trace_eq_matrix_trace`. -/
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset {s : finset M} (b : basis s R M)
(f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix b b f) :=
have ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s R M),
from ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩,
by { rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← trace_aux_def], congr' 1, apply trace_aux_eq }
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = matrix.trace (linear_map.to_matrix b b f) :=
by rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset R b.reindex_finset_range,
← trace_aux_def, ← trace_aux_def, trace_aux_eq R b]
theorem trace_mul_comm (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * g) = trace R M (g * f) :=
if H : ∃ (s : finset M), nonempty (basis s R M) then let ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H in
by { simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, linear_map.to_matrix_mul], apply matrix.trace_mul_comm }
else by rw [trace, dif_neg H, linear_map.zero_apply, linear_map.zero_apply]
/-- The trace of an endomorphism is invariant under conjugation -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj (g : M →ₗ[R] M) (f : (M →ₗ[R] M)ˣ) :
trace R M (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = trace R M g :=
by { rw trace_mul_comm, simp }
end
section
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables (N : Type*) [add_comm_group N] [module R N]
variables {ι : Type*}
/-- The trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
lemma trace_eq_contract_of_basis [finite ι] (b : basis ι R M) :
(linear_map.trace R M) ∘ₗ (dual_tensor_hom R M M) = contract_left R M :=
begin
classical,
casesI nonempty_fintype ι,
apply basis.ext (basis.tensor_product (basis.dual_basis b) b),
rintros ⟨i, j⟩,
simp only [function.comp_app, basis.tensor_product_apply, basis.coe_dual_basis, coe_comp],
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, to_matrix_dual_tensor_hom],
by_cases hij : i = j,
{ rw [hij], simp },
rw matrix.std_basis_matrix.trace_zero j i (1:R) hij,
simp [finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, hij],
end
/-- The trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
lemma trace_eq_contract_of_basis' [fintype ι] [decidable_eq ι] (b : basis ι R M) :
(linear_map.trace R M) =
(contract_left R M) ∘ₗ (dual_tensor_hom_equiv_of_basis b).symm.to_linear_map :=
by simp [linear_equiv.eq_comp_to_linear_map_symm, trace_eq_contract_of_basis b]
variables (R M N)
variables [module.free R M] [module.finite R M] [module.free R N] [module.finite R N] [nontrivial R]
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
@[simp] theorem trace_eq_contract :
(linear_map.trace R M) ∘ₗ (dual_tensor_hom R M M) = contract_left R M :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis (module.free.choose_basis R M)
@[simp] theorem trace_eq_contract_apply (x : module.dual R M ⊗[R] M) :
(linear_map.trace R M) ((dual_tensor_hom R M M) x) = contract_left R M x :=
by rw [←comp_apply, trace_eq_contract]
open_locale classical
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`-/
theorem trace_eq_contract' :
(linear_map.trace R M) =
(contract_left R M) ∘ₗ (dual_tensor_hom_equiv R M M).symm.to_linear_map :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis' (module.free.choose_basis R M)
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module -/
@[simp] theorem trace_one : trace R M 1 = (finrank R M : R) :=
begin
have b := module.free.choose_basis R M,
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, to_matrix_one, finrank_eq_card_choose_basis_index],
simp,
end
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module -/
@[simp] theorem trace_id : trace R M id = (finrank R M : R) :=
by rw [←one_eq_id, trace_one]
@[simp] theorem trace_transpose : trace R (module.dual R M) ∘ₗ module.dual.transpose = trace R M :=
begin
let e := dual_tensor_hom_equiv R M M,
have h : function.surjective e.to_linear_map := e.surjective,
refine (cancel_right h).1 _,
ext f m, simp [e],
end
theorem trace_prod_map :
trace R (M × N) ∘ₗ prod_map_linear R M N M N R =
(coprod id id : R × R →ₗ[R] R) ∘ₗ prod_map (trace R M) (trace R N) :=
begin
let e := ((dual_tensor_hom_equiv R M M).prod (dual_tensor_hom_equiv R N N)),
have h : function.surjective e.to_linear_map := e.surjective,
refine (cancel_right h).1 _,
ext,
{ simp only [dual_tensor_hom_equiv, tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.curry_apply,
to_fun_eq_coe, tensor_product.curry_apply, coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe, coe_comp,
linear_equiv.coe_to_linear_map, coe_inl, function.comp_app, linear_equiv.prod_apply,
dual_tensor_hom_equiv_of_basis_apply, map_zero, prod_map_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id.def,
add_zero, prod_map_linear_apply, dual_tensor_hom_prod_map_zero, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contract_left_apply, fst_apply] },
{ simp only [dual_tensor_hom_equiv, tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.curry_apply,
to_fun_eq_coe, tensor_product.curry_apply, coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe, coe_comp,
linear_equiv.coe_to_linear_map, coe_inr, function.comp_app, linear_equiv.prod_apply,
dual_tensor_hom_equiv_of_basis_apply, map_zero, prod_map_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id.def,
zero_add, prod_map_linear_apply, zero_prod_map_dual_tensor_hom, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contract_left_apply, snd_apply], },
end
variables {R M N}
theorem trace_prod_map' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M × N) (prod_map f g) = trace R M f + trace R N g :=
begin
have h := ext_iff.1 (trace_prod_map R M N) (f, g),
simp only [coe_comp, function.comp_app, prod_map_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id.def,
prod_map_linear_apply] at h, exact h,
end
variables (R M N)
open tensor_product function
theorem trace_tensor_product :
compr₂ (map_bilinear R M N M N) (trace R (M ⊗ N)) =
compl₁₂ (lsmul R R : R →ₗ[R] R →ₗ[R] R) (trace R M) (trace R N) :=
begin
apply (compl₁₂_inj
(show surjective (dual_tensor_hom R M M), from (dual_tensor_hom_equiv R M M).surjective)
(show surjective (dual_tensor_hom R N N), from (dual_tensor_hom_equiv R N N).surjective)).1,
ext f m g n,
simp only [algebra_tensor_module.curry_apply, to_fun_eq_coe, tensor_product.curry_apply,
coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe, compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, map_bilinear_apply,
trace_eq_contract_apply, contract_left_apply, lsmul_apply, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
map_dual_tensor_hom, dual_distrib_apply],
end
theorem trace_comp_comm :
compr₂ (llcomp R M N M) (trace R M) = compr₂ (llcomp R N M N).flip (trace R N) :=
begin
apply (compl₁₂_inj
(show surjective (dual_tensor_hom R N M), from (dual_tensor_hom_equiv R N M).surjective)
(show surjective (dual_tensor_hom R M N), from (dual_tensor_hom_equiv R M N).surjective)).1,
ext g m f n,
simp only [tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.curry_apply, to_fun_eq_coe,
linear_equiv.coe_to_linear_map, tensor_product.curry_apply, coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe,
compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, flip_apply, llcomp_apply', comp_dual_tensor_hom, map_smul,
trace_eq_contract_apply, contract_left_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm],
end
variables {R M N}
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R _ (module.dual.transpose f) = trace R M f :=
by { rw [←comp_apply, trace_transpose] }
theorem trace_tensor_product' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M ⊗ N) (map f g) = trace R M f * trace R N g :=
begin
have h := ext_iff.1 (ext_iff.1 (trace_tensor_product R M N) f) g,
simp only [compr₂_apply, map_bilinear_apply, compl₁₂_apply, lsmul_apply,
algebra.id.smul_eq_mul] at h, exact h,
end
theorem trace_comp_comm' (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (g ∘ₗ f) = trace R N (f ∘ₗ g) :=
begin
have h := ext_iff.1 (ext_iff.1 (trace_comp_comm R M N) g) f,
simp only [llcomp_apply', compr₂_apply, flip_apply] at h,
exact h,
end
@[simp] theorem trace_conj' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : trace R N (e.conj f) = trace R M f :=
by rw [e.conj_apply, trace_comp_comm', ←comp_assoc, linear_equiv.comp_coe,
linear_equiv.self_trans_symm, linear_equiv.refl_to_linear_map, id_comp]
theorem is_proj.trace {p : submodule R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] M} (h : is_proj p f)
[module.free R p] [module.finite R p] [module.free R f.ker] [module.finite R f.ker] :
trace R M f = (finrank R p : R) :=
by rw [h.eq_conj_prod_map, trace_conj', trace_prod_map', trace_id, map_zero, add_zero]
end
end linear_map
|
138370ec191a79496581b5e11231b92847d3e96c | a6b711a4e8db20755026231f7ed529a9014b2b6d | /ZZ_IGNORE/RAW/02_dm_int/dm_int.lean | 7b33b2d6eb1393a7302dccbea58288cce6a3525e | [] | no_license | chaseboettner/cs-dm-1 | b67d4a7e86f56bce59d2af115503769749d423b2 | 80b35f2957ffaa45b8b7a4479a3570a2d6eb4db0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,367,603,488 | 1,536,235,675,000 | 1,536,235,675,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 119 | lean | import ..dm_nat.dm_nat
inductive integer : Type
| of_nat : natural → integer
| neg_succ_of_nat : natural → integer |
b814890d2f0a864cde31929819c2eddace66104e | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /library/data/list/perm.lean | fdc7b9051c17da0b1f7959f9a157b2642a72e64c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 40,948 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
List permutations.
-/
import data.list.basic data.list.set
open list setoid nat binary
variables {A B : Type}
inductive perm : list A → list A → Prop :=
| nil : perm [] []
| skip : Π (x : A) {l₁ l₂ : list A}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm (x::l₁) (x::l₂)
| swap : Π (x y : A) (l : list A), perm (y::x::l) (x::y::l)
| trans : Π {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list A}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm l₂ l₃ → perm l₁ l₃
namespace perm
infix ~ := perm
theorem eq_nil_of_perm_nil {l₁ : list A} (p : [] ~ l₁) : l₁ = [] :=
have gen : ∀ (l₂ : list A) (p : l₂ ~ l₁), l₂ = [] → l₁ = [], from
take l₂ p, perm.induction_on p
(λ h, h)
(by contradiction)
(by contradiction)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ e, r₂ (r₁ e)),
gen [] p rfl
theorem not_perm_nil_cons (x : A) (l : list A) : ¬ [] ~ (x::l) :=
have gen : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list A) (p : l₁ ~ l₂), l₁ = [] → l₂ = (x::l) → false, from
take l₁ l₂ p, perm.induction_on p
(by contradiction)
(by contradiction)
(by contradiction)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ e₁ e₂,
begin
rewrite [e₂ at *, e₁ at *],
have e₃ : l₂ = [], from eq_nil_of_perm_nil p₁,
exact (r₂ e₃ rfl)
end),
assume p, gen [] (x::l) p rfl rfl
protected theorem refl [refl] : ∀ (l : list A), l ~ l
| [] := nil
| (x::xs) := skip x (refl xs)
protected theorem symm [symm] : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, l₁ ~ l₂ → l₂ ~ l₁ :=
take l₁ l₂ p, perm.induction_on p
nil
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, skip x r₁)
(λ x y l, swap y x l)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₂ r₁)
attribute perm.trans [trans]
theorem eqv (A : Type) : equivalence (@perm A) :=
mk_equivalence (@perm A) (@perm.refl A) (@perm.symm A) (@perm.trans A)
protected definition is_setoid [instance] (A : Type) : setoid (list A) :=
setoid.mk (@perm A) (perm.eqv A)
theorem mem_perm {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ :=
assume p, perm.induction_on p
(λ h, h)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁ i, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons i)
(suppose a = x, by rewrite this; apply !mem_cons)
(suppose a ∈ l₁, or.inr (r₁ this)))
(λ x y l ainyxl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainyxl)
(suppose a = y, by rewrite this; exact (or.inr !mem_cons))
(suppose a ∈ x::l, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = x, or.inl this)
(suppose a ∈ l, or.inr (or.inr this))))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ ainl₁, r₂ (r₁ ainl₁))
theorem not_mem_perm {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ :=
assume p nainl₁ ainl₂, absurd (mem_perm (perm.symm p) ainl₂) nainl₁
theorem perm_app_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (l₁++t₁) ~ (l₂++t₁) :=
assume p, perm.induction_on p
!perm.refl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, skip x r₁)
(λ x y l, !swap)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm_app_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list A} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (l++t₁) ~ (l++t₂) :=
list.induction_on l
(λ p, p)
(λ x xs r p, skip x (r p))
theorem perm_app [congr] {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (l₁++t₁) ~ (l₂++t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_app_left t₁ p₁) (perm_app_right l₂ p₂)
theorem perm_app_cons (a : A) {h₁ h₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : h₁ ~ h₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (h₁ ++ (a::t₁)) ~ (h₂ ++ (a::t₂)) :=
assume p₁ p₂, perm_app p₁ (skip a p₂)
theorem perm_cons_app (a : A) : ∀ (l : list A), (a::l) ~ (l ++ [a])
| [] := !perm.refl
| (x::xs) := calc
a::x::xs ~ x::a::xs : swap x a xs
... ~ x::(xs++[a]) : skip x (perm_cons_app xs)
theorem perm_cons_app_simp [simp] (a : A) : ∀ (l : list A), (l ++ [a]) ~ (a::l) :=
take l, perm.symm !perm_cons_app
theorem perm_app_comm [simp] {l₁ l₂ : list A} : (l₁++l₂) ~ (l₂++l₁) :=
list.induction_on l₁
(by rewrite [append_nil_right, append_nil_left])
(λ a t r, calc
a::(t++l₂) ~ a::(l₂++t) : skip a r
... ~ l₂++t++[a] : perm_cons_app
... = l₂++(t++[a]) : append.assoc
... ~ l₂++(a::t) : perm_app_right l₂ (perm.symm (perm_cons_app a t)))
theorem length_eq_length_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ :=
assume p, perm.induction_on p
rfl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, by rewrite [*length_cons, r])
(λ x y l, by rewrite *length_cons)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, eq.trans r₁ r₂)
theorem eq_singleton_of_perm_inv (a : A) {l : list A} : [a] ~ l → l = [a] :=
have gen : ∀ l₂, perm l₂ l → l₂ = [a] → l = [a], from
take l₂, assume p, perm.induction_on p
(λ e, e)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r e,
begin
injection e with e₁ e₂,
rewrite [e₁, e₂ at p],
have h₁ : l₂ = [], from eq_nil_of_perm_nil p,
substvars
end)
(λ x y l e, by injection e; contradiction)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ e, r₂ (r₁ e)),
assume p, gen [a] p rfl
theorem eq_singleton_of_perm (a b : A) : [a] ~ [b] → a = b :=
assume p,
begin
injection eq_singleton_of_perm_inv a p with e₁,
rewrite e₁
end
theorem perm_rev : ∀ (l : list A), l ~ (reverse l)
| [] := nil
| (x::xs) := calc
x::xs ~ xs++[x] : perm_cons_app x xs
... ~ reverse xs ++ [x] : perm_app_left [x] (perm_rev xs)
... = reverse (x::xs) : by rewrite [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem perm_rev_simp [simp] : ∀ (l : list A), (reverse l) ~ l :=
take l, perm.symm (perm_rev l)
theorem perm_middle (a : A) (l₁ l₂ : list A) : (a::l₁)++l₂ ~ l₁++(a::l₂) :=
calc
(a::l₁) ++ l₂ = a::(l₁++l₂) : rfl
... ~ l₁++l₂++[a] : perm_cons_app
... = l₁++(l₂++[a]) : append.assoc
... ~ l₁++(a::l₂) : perm_app_right l₁ (perm.symm (perm_cons_app a l₂))
theorem perm_middle_simp [simp] (a : A) (l₁ l₂ : list A) : l₁++(a::l₂) ~ (a::l₁)++l₂ :=
perm.symm !perm_middle
theorem perm_cons_app_cons {l l₁ l₂ : list A} (a : A) : l ~ l₁++l₂ → a::l ~ l₁++(a::l₂) :=
assume p, calc
a::l ~ l++[a] : perm_cons_app
... ~ l₁++l₂++[a] : perm_app_left [a] p
... = l₁++(l₂++[a]) : append.assoc
... ~ l₁++(a::l₂) : perm_app_right l₁ (perm.symm (perm_cons_app a l₂))
open decidable
theorem perm_erase [decidable_eq A] {a : A} : ∀ {l : list A}, a ∈ l → l ~ a::(erase a l)
| [] h := absurd h !not_mem_nil
| (x::t) h :=
by_cases
(assume aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx, erase_cons_head])
(assume naeqx : a ≠ x,
have aint : a ∈ t, from mem_of_ne_of_mem naeqx h,
have aux : t ~ a :: erase a t, from perm_erase aint,
calc x::t ~ x::a::(erase a t) : skip x aux
... ~ a::x::(erase a t) : swap
... = a::(erase a (x::t)) : by rewrite [!erase_cons_tail naeqx])
theorem erase_perm_erase_of_perm [congr] [decidable_eq A] (a : A) {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → erase a l₁ ~ erase a l₂ :=
assume p, perm.induction_on p
nil
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r,
by_cases
(assume aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx, *erase_cons_head]; exact p)
(assume naeqx : a ≠ x, by rewrite [*erase_cons_tail _ naeqx]; exact (skip x r)))
(λ x y l,
by_cases
(assume aeqx : a = x,
by_cases
(assume aeqy : a = y, by rewrite [-aeqx, -aeqy])
(assume naeqy : a ≠ y, by rewrite [-aeqx, erase_cons_tail _ naeqy, *erase_cons_head]))
(assume naeqx : a ≠ x,
by_cases
(assume aeqy : a = y, by rewrite [-aeqy, erase_cons_tail _ naeqx, *erase_cons_head])
(assume naeqy : a ≠ y, by rewrite[erase_cons_tail _ naeqx, *erase_cons_tail _ naeqy, erase_cons_tail _ naeqx];
exact !swap)))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm_induction_on {P : list A → list A → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list A} (p : l₁ ~ l₂)
(h₁ : P [] [])
(h₂ : ∀ x l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (x::l₁) (x::l₂))
(h₃ : ∀ x y l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (y::x::l₁) (x::y::l₂))
(h₄ : ∀ l₁ l₂ l₃, l₁ ~ l₂ → l₂ ~ l₃ → P l₁ l₂ → P l₂ l₃ → P l₁ l₃)
: P l₁ l₂ :=
have P_refl : ∀ l, P l l
| [] := h₁
| (x::xs) := h₂ x xs xs !perm.refl (P_refl xs),
perm.induction_on p h₁ h₂ (λ x y l, h₃ x y l l !perm.refl !P_refl) h₄
theorem xswap {l₁ l₂ : list A} (x y : A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → x::y::l₁ ~ y::x::l₂ :=
assume p, calc
x::y::l₁ ~ y::x::l₁ : swap
... ~ y::x::l₂ : skip y (skip x p)
theorem perm_map [congr] (f : A → B) {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → map f l₁ ~ map f l₂ :=
assume p, perm_induction_on p
nil
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, skip (f x) r)
(λ x y l₁ l₂ p r, xswap (f y) (f x) r)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
lemma perm_of_qeq {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁≈a|l₂ → l₁~a::l₂ :=
assume q, qeq.induction_on q
(λ h, !perm.refl)
(λ b t₁ t₂ q₁ r₁, calc
b::t₂ ~ b::a::t₁ : skip b r₁
... ~ a::b::t₁ : swap)
/- permutation is decidable if A has decidable equality -/
section dec
open decidable
variable [Ha : decidable_eq A]
include Ha
definition decidable_perm_aux : ∀ (n : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list A), length l₁ = n → length l₂ = n → decidable (l₁ ~ l₂)
| 0 l₁ l₂ H₁ H₂ :=
assert l₁n : l₁ = [], from eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero H₁,
assert l₂n : l₂ = [], from eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero H₂,
by rewrite [l₁n, l₂n]; exact (inl perm.nil)
| (n+1) (x::t₁) l₂ H₁ H₂ :=
by_cases
(assume xinl₂ : x ∈ l₂,
let t₂ : list A := erase x l₂ in
have len_t₁ : length t₁ = n, begin injection H₁ with e, exact e end,
assert length t₂ = pred (length l₂), from length_erase_of_mem xinl₂,
assert length t₂ = n, by rewrite [this, H₂],
match decidable_perm_aux n t₁ t₂ len_t₁ this with
| inl p := inl (calc
x::t₁ ~ x::(erase x l₂) : skip x p
... ~ l₂ : perm_erase xinl₂)
| inr np := inr (λ p : x::t₁ ~ l₂,
assert erase x (x::t₁) ~ erase x l₂, from erase_perm_erase_of_perm x p,
have t₁ ~ erase x l₂, by rewrite [erase_cons_head at this]; exact this,
absurd this np)
end)
(assume nxinl₂ : x ∉ l₂,
inr (λ p : x::t₁ ~ l₂, absurd (mem_perm p !mem_cons) nxinl₂))
definition decidable_perm [instance] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list A), decidable (l₁ ~ l₂) :=
λ l₁ l₂,
by_cases
(assume eql : length l₁ = length l₂,
decidable_perm_aux (length l₂) l₁ l₂ eql rfl)
(assume neql : length l₁ ≠ length l₂,
inr (λ p : l₁ ~ l₂, absurd (length_eq_length_of_perm p) neql))
end dec
-- Auxiliary theorem for performing cases-analysis on l₂.
-- We use it to prove perm_inv_core.
private theorem discr {P : Prop} {a b : A} {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list A} :
a::l₁ = l₂++(b::l₃) →
(l₂ = [] → a = b → l₁ = l₃ → P) →
(∀ t, l₂ = a::t → l₁ = t++(b::l₃) → P) → P :=
match l₂ with
| [] := λ e h₁ h₂, by injection e with e₁ e₂; exact h₁ rfl e₁ e₂
| h::t := λ e h₁ h₂,
begin
injection e with e₁ e₂,
rewrite e₁ at h₂,
exact h₂ t rfl e₂
end
end
-- Auxiliary theorem for performing cases-analysis on l₂.
-- We use it to prove perm_inv_core.
private theorem discr₂ {P : Prop} {a b c : A} {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list A} :
a::b::l₁ = l₂++(c::l₃) →
(l₂ = [] → l₃ = b::l₁ → a = c → P) →
(l₂ = [a] → b = c → l₁ = l₃ → P) →
(∀ t, l₂ = a::b::t → l₁ = t++(c::l₃) → P) → P :=
match l₂ with
| [] := λ e H₁ H₂ H₃,
begin
injection e with a_eq_c b_l₁_eq_l₃,
exact H₁ rfl (eq.symm b_l₁_eq_l₃) a_eq_c
end
| [h₁] := λ e H₁ H₂ H₃,
begin
rewrite [append_cons at e, append_nil_left at e],
injection e with a_eq_h₁ b_eq_c l₁_eq_l₃,
rewrite [a_eq_h₁ at H₂, b_eq_c at H₂, l₁_eq_l₃ at H₂],
exact H₂ rfl rfl rfl
end
| h₁::h₂::t₂ := λ e H₁ H₂ H₃,
begin
injection e with a_eq_h₁ b_eq_h₂ l₁_eq,
rewrite [a_eq_h₁ at H₃, b_eq_h₂ at H₃],
exact H₃ t₂ rfl l₁_eq
end
end
/- permutation inversion -/
theorem perm_inv_core {l₁ l₂ : list A} (p' : l₁ ~ l₂) : ∀ {a s₁ s₂}, l₁≈a|s₁ → l₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂ :=
perm_induction_on p'
(λ a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
have innil : a ∈ [], from mem_head_of_qeq e₁,
absurd innil !not_mem_nil)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p (r : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₁≈a|s₁ → t₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂) a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
obtain (s₁₁ s₁₂ : list A) (C₁₁ : s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂) (C₁₂ : x::t₁ = s₁₁++(a::s₁₂)), from qeq_split e₁,
obtain (s₂₁ s₂₂ : list A) (C₂₁ : s₂ = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂) (C₂₂ : x::t₂ = s₂₁++(a::s₂₂)), from qeq_split e₂,
discr C₁₂
(λ (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = []) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₁_eq : t₁ = s₁₂),
assert s₁_p : s₁ ~ t₂, from calc
s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂ : C₁₁
... = t₁ : by rewrite [-t₁_eq, s₁₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... ~ t₂ : p,
discr C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₂_eq: t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ ~ t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [-t₂_eq, s₂₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
proof calc
s₁ ~ t₂ : s₁_p
... = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂) : t₂_eq
... ~ (a::ts₂₁)++s₂₂ : !perm_middle
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [-x_eq_a, -s₂₁_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed))
(λ (ts₁₁ : list A) (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = x::ts₁₁) (t₁_eq : t₁ = ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)),
assert t₁_qeq : t₁ ≈ a|(ts₁₁++s₁₂), by rewrite t₁_eq; exact !qeq_app,
assert s₁_eq : s₁ = x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂), from calc
s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂ : C₁₁
... = x::(ts₁₁++ s₁₂) : by rewrite s₁₁_eq,
discr C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₂_eq: t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ = a::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite [s₁_eq, x_eq_a]
... ~ ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂) : !perm_middle
... = t₁ : t₁_eq
... ~ t₂ : p
... = s₂ : by rewrite [t₂_eq, C₂₁, s₂₁_eq, append_nil_left]
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
assert t₂_qeq : t₂ ≈ a|(ts₂₁++s₂₂), by rewrite t₂_eq; exact !qeq_app,
proof calc
s₁ = x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : s₁_eq
... ~ x::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : skip x (r t₁_qeq t₂_qeq)
... = s₂ : by rewrite [-append_cons, -s₂₁_eq, C₂₁]
qed)))
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p (r : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₁≈a|s₁ → t₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂) a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
obtain (s₁₁ s₁₂ : list A) (C₁₁ : s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂) (C₁₂ : y::x::t₁ = s₁₁++(a::s₁₂)), from qeq_split e₁,
obtain (s₂₁ s₂₂ : list A) (C₂₁ : s₂ = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂) (C₂₂ : x::y::t₂ = s₂₁++(a::s₂₂)), from qeq_split e₂,
discr₂ C₁₂
(λ (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = []) (s₁₂_eq : s₁₂ = x::t₁) (y_eq_a : y = a),
assert s₁_p : s₁ ~ x::t₂, from calc
s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂ : C₁₁
... = x::t₁ : by rewrite [s₁₂_eq, s₁₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... ~ x::t₂ : skip x p,
discr₂ C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (s₂₂_eq : s₂₂ = y::t₂) (x_eq_a : x = a),
proof calc
s₁ ~ x::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [x_eq_a, -y_eq_a, -s₂₂_eq, s₂₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = [x]) (y_eq_a : y = a) (t₂_eq : t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ ~ x::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [t₂_eq, s₂₁_eq, append_cons]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::y::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
proof calc
s₁ ~ x::t₂ : s₁_p
... = x::(ts₂₁++(y::s₂₂)) : by rewrite [t₂_eq, -y_eq_a]
... ~ x::y::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : skip x !perm_middle
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, append_cons]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed))
(λ (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = [y]) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₁_eq : t₁ = s₁₂),
assert s₁_p : s₁ ~ y::t₂, from calc
s₁ = y::t₁ : by rewrite [C₁₁, s₁₁_eq, t₁_eq]
... ~ y::t₂ : skip y p,
discr₂ C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (s₂₂_eq : s₂₂ = y::t₂) (x_eq_a : x = a),
proof calc
s₁ ~ y::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, s₂₂_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = [x]) (y_eq_a : y = a) (t₂_eq : t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ ~ y::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, t₂_eq, y_eq_a, -x_eq_a]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::y::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
proof calc
s₁ ~ y::t₂ : s₁_p
... = y::(ts₂₁++(x::s₂₂)) : by rewrite [t₂_eq, -x_eq_a]
... ~ y::x::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : skip y !perm_middle
... ~ x::y::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : swap
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed))
(λ (ts₁₁ : list A) (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = y::x::ts₁₁) (t₁_eq : t₁ = ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)),
assert s₁_eq : s₁ = y::x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂), by rewrite [C₁₁, s₁₁_eq],
discr₂ C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (s₂₂_eq : s₂₂ = y::t₂) (x_eq_a : x = a),
proof calc
s₁ = y::a::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite [s₁_eq, x_eq_a]
... ~ y::(ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)) : skip y !perm_middle
... = y::t₁ : by rewrite t₁_eq
... ~ y::t₂ : skip y p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, s₂₂_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = [x]) (y_eq_a : y = a) (t₂_eq : t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ = y::x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite s₁_eq
... ~ x::y::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : swap
... = x::a::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite y_eq_a
... ~ x::(ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)) : skip x !perm_middle
... = x::t₁ : by rewrite t₁_eq
... ~ x::t₂ : skip x p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [t₂_eq, s₂₁_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::y::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
assert t₁_qeq : t₁ ≈ a|(ts₁₁++s₁₂), by rewrite t₁_eq; exact !qeq_app,
assert t₂_qeq : t₂ ≈ a|(ts₂₁++s₂₂), by rewrite t₂_eq; exact !qeq_app,
assert p_aux : ts₁₁++s₁₂ ~ ts₂₁++s₂₂, from r t₁_qeq t₂_qeq,
proof calc
s₁ = y::x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite s₁_eq
... ~ y::x::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : skip y (skip x p_aux)
... ~ x::y::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : swap
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite s₂₁_eq
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)))
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂
(r₁ : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₁ ≈ a|s₁ → t₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂)
(r₂ : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₂ ≈ a|s₁ → t₃≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂)
a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
have a ∈ t₁, from mem_head_of_qeq e₁,
have a ∈ t₂, from mem_perm p₁ this,
obtain (t₂' : list A) (e₂' : t₂≈a|t₂'), from qeq_of_mem this,
calc s₁ ~ t₂' : r₁ e₁ e₂'
... ~ s₂ : r₂ e₂' e₂)
theorem perm_cons_inv {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : a::l₁ ~ a::l₂ → l₁ ~ l₂ :=
assume p, perm_inv_core p (qeq.qhead a l₁) (qeq.qhead a l₂)
theorem perm_app_inv {a : A} {l₁ l₂ l₃ l₄ : list A} : l₁++(a::l₂) ~ l₃++(a::l₄) → l₁++l₂ ~ l₃++l₄ :=
assume p : l₁++(a::l₂) ~ l₃++(a::l₄),
have p' : a::(l₁++l₂) ~ a::(l₃++l₄), from calc
a::(l₁++l₂) ~ l₁++(a::l₂) : perm_middle
... ~ l₃++(a::l₄) : p
... ~ a::(l₃++l₄) : perm.symm (!perm_middle),
perm_cons_inv p'
section foldl
variables {f : B → A → B} {l₁ l₂ : list A}
variable rcomm : right_commutative f
include rcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_perm : l₁ ~ l₂ → ∀ b, foldl f b l₁ = foldl f b l₂ :=
assume p, perm_induction_on p
(λ b, by rewrite *foldl_nil)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldl f b (x::t₁) = foldl f (f b x) t₁ : foldl_cons
... = foldl f (f b x) t₂ : r (f b x)
... = foldl f b (x::t₂) : foldl_cons)
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldl f b (y :: x :: t₁) = foldl f (f (f b y) x) t₁ : by rewrite foldl_cons
... = foldl f (f (f b x) y) t₁ : by rewrite rcomm
... = foldl f (f (f b x) y) t₂ : r (f (f b x) y)
... = foldl f b (x :: y :: t₂) : by rewrite foldl_cons)
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ b, eq.trans (r₁ b) (r₂ b))
end foldl
section foldr
variables {f : A → B → B} {l₁ l₂ : list A}
variable lcomm : left_commutative f
include lcomm
theorem foldr_eq_of_perm : l₁ ~ l₂ → ∀ b, foldr f b l₁ = foldr f b l₂ :=
assume p, perm_induction_on p
(λ b, by rewrite *foldl_nil)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldr f b (x::t₁) = f x (foldr f b t₁) : foldr_cons
... = f x (foldr f b t₂) : by rewrite [r b]
... = foldr f b (x::t₂) : foldr_cons)
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldr f b (y :: x :: t₁) = f y (f x (foldr f b t₁)) : by rewrite foldr_cons
... = f x (f y (foldr f b t₁)) : by rewrite lcomm
... = f x (f y (foldr f b t₂)) : by rewrite [r b]
... = foldr f b (x :: y :: t₂) : by rewrite foldr_cons)
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ a, eq.trans (r₁ a) (r₂ a))
end foldr
theorem perm_erase_dup_of_perm [congr] [H : decidable_eq A] {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → erase_dup l₁ ~ erase_dup l₂ :=
assume p, perm_induction_on p
nil
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
assert xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup xint₁)),
by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₂]; exact r)
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁,
assert nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from
assume xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup xint₂))) nxint₁,
by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₁]; exact (skip x r)))
(λ y x t₁ t₂ p r, by_cases
(λ xinyt₁ : x ∈ y::t₁, by_cases
(λ yint₁ : y ∈ t₁,
assert yint₂ : y ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup yint₁)),
assert yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, from or.inr (yint₂),
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xinyt₁)
(λ xeqy : x = y,
assert xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, by rewrite [-xeqy at yint₂]; exact yint₂,
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_mem yint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₂],
exact r
end)
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
assert xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup xint₁)),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_mem yint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₂],
exact r
end))
(λ nyint₁ : y ∉ t₁,
assert nyint₂ : y ∉ t₂, from
assume yint₂ : y ∈ t₂, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup yint₂))) nyint₁,
by_cases
(λ xeqy : x = y,
assert nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, by rewrite [-xeqy at nyint₂]; exact nyint₂,
assert yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, by rewrite [xeqy]; exact !mem_cons,
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂, xeqy],
exact skip y r
end)
(λ xney : x ≠ y,
have x ∈ t₁, from or_resolve_right xinyt₁ xney,
assert x ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup this)),
assert y ∉ x::t₂, from
suppose y ∈ x::t₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(λ h, absurd h (ne.symm xney))
(λ h, absurd h nyint₂),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem `y ∉ x::t₂`,
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem `x ∈ t₂`],
exact skip y r
end)))
(λ nxinyt₁ : x ∉ y::t₁,
have xney : x ≠ y, from ne_of_not_mem_cons nxinyt₁,
have nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_cons nxinyt₁,
assert nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from
assume xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup xint₂))) nxint₁,
by_cases
(λ yint₁ : y ∈ t₁,
assert yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, from or.inr (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup yint₁))),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_mem yint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂],
exact skip x r
end)
(λ nyint₁ : y ∉ t₁,
assert nyinxt₂ : y ∉ x::t₂, from
assume yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons yinxt₂)
(λ h, absurd h (ne.symm xney))
(λ h, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup h))) nyint₁),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂],
exact xswap x y r
end)))
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
section perm_union
variable [H : decidable_eq A]
include H
theorem perm_union_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (union l₁ t₁) ~ (union l₂ t₁) :=
assume p, perm.induction_on p
(by rewrite [nil_union])
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁, by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ xint₁]; exact r₁)
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, by rewrite [*union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁]; exact (skip _ r₁)))
(λ x y l, by_cases
(λ yint : y ∈ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ xint, *union_cons_of_mem _ yint, *union_cons_of_mem _ xint])
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ yint, *union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, union_cons_of_mem _ yint]))
(λ nyint : y ∉ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ xint, *union_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint, union_cons_of_mem _ xint])
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, *union_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint, union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint]; exact !swap)))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm_union_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list A} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (union l t₁) ~ (union l t₂) :=
list.induction_on l
(λ p, by rewrite [*union_nil]; exact p)
(λ x xs r p, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
assert xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_perm p xint₁,
by rewrite [union_cons_of_mem _ xint₁, union_cons_of_mem _ xint₂]; exact (r p))
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁,
assert nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from not_mem_perm p nxint₁,
by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁, union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₂]; exact (skip _ (r p))))
theorem perm_union [congr] {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (union l₁ t₁) ~ (union l₂ t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_union_left t₁ p₁) (perm_union_right l₂ p₂)
end perm_union
section perm_insert
variable [H : decidable_eq A]
include H
theorem perm_insert [congr] (a : A) {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → (insert a l₁) ~ (insert a l₂) :=
assume p, by_cases
(λ ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁,
assert ainl₂ : a ∈ l₂, from mem_perm p ainl₁,
by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem ainl₁, insert_eq_of_mem ainl₂]; exact p)
(λ nainl₁ : a ∉ l₁,
assert nainl₂ : a ∉ l₂, from not_mem_perm p nainl₁,
by rewrite [insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl₁, insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl₂]; exact (skip _ p))
end perm_insert
section perm_inter
variable [H : decidable_eq A]
include H
theorem perm_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (inter l₁ t₁) ~ (inter l₂ t₁) :=
assume p, perm.induction_on p
!perm.refl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁, by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ xint₁]; exact (skip x r₁))
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁]; exact r₁))
(λ x y l, by_cases
(λ yint : y ∈ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ xint, *inter_cons_of_mem _ yint, *inter_cons_of_mem _ xint];
exact !swap)
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ yint, *inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, inter_cons_of_mem _ yint]))
(λ nyint : y ∉ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ xint, *inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint, inter_cons_of_mem _ xint])
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, *inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint,
inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint])))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm_inter_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list A} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (inter l t₁) ~ (inter l t₂) :=
list.induction_on l
(λ p, by rewrite [*inter_nil])
(λ x xs r p, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
assert xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_perm p xint₁,
by rewrite [inter_cons_of_mem _ xint₁, inter_cons_of_mem _ xint₂]; exact (skip _ (r p)))
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁,
assert nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from not_mem_perm p nxint₁,
by rewrite [inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁, inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₂]; exact (r p)))
theorem perm_inter [congr] {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (inter l₁ t₁) ~ (inter l₂ t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_inter_left t₁ p₁) (perm_inter_right l₂ p₂)
end perm_inter
/- extensionality -/
section ext
open eq.ops
theorem perm_ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ → (∀a, a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂) → l₁ ~ l₂
| [] [] d₁ d₂ e := !perm.nil
| [] (a₂::t₂) d₁ d₂ e := absurd (iff.mpr (e a₂) !mem_cons) (not_mem_nil a₂)
| (a₁::t₁) [] d₁ d₂ e := absurd (iff.mp (e a₁) !mem_cons) (not_mem_nil a₁)
| (a₁::t₁) (a₂::t₂) d₁ d₂ e :=
have a₁ ∈ a₂::t₂, from iff.mp (e a₁) !mem_cons,
have ∃ s₁ s₂, a₂::t₂ = s₁++(a₁::s₂), from mem_split this,
obtain (s₁ s₂ : list A) (t₂_eq : a₂::t₂ = s₁++(a₁::s₂)), from this,
have dt₂' : nodup (a₁::(s₁++s₂)), from nodup_head (by rewrite [t₂_eq at d₂]; exact d₂),
have eqv : ∀a, a ∈ t₁ ↔ a ∈ s₁++s₂, from
take a, iff.intro
(suppose a ∈ t₁,
assert a ∈ a₂::t₂, from iff.mp (e a) (mem_cons_of_mem _ this),
have a ∈ s₁++(a₁::s₂), by rewrite [t₂_eq at this]; exact this,
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append this)
(suppose a ∈ s₁, mem_append_left s₂ this)
(suppose a ∈ a₁::s₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = a₁,
assert a₁ ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁,
by subst a; contradiction)
(suppose a ∈ s₂, mem_append_right s₁ this)))
(suppose a ∈ s₁ ++ s₂, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append this)
(suppose a ∈ s₁,
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_left _ this),
have a ∈ a₁::t₁, from iff.mpr (e a) this,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = a₁,
have a₁ ∉ s₁++s₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
assert a₁ ∉ s₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left this,
by subst a; contradiction)
(suppose a ∈ t₁, this))
(suppose a ∈ s₂,
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_right _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ this)),
have a ∈ a₁::t₁, from iff.mpr (e a) this,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = a₁,
have a₁ ∉ s₁++s₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
assert a₁ ∉ s₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right this,
by subst a; contradiction)
(suppose a ∈ t₁, this))),
have ds₁s₂ : nodup (s₁++s₂), from nodup_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
have nodup t₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons d₁,
calc a₁::t₁ ~ a₁::(s₁++s₂) : skip a₁ (perm_ext this ds₁s₂ eqv)
... ~ s₁++(a₁::s₂) : !perm_middle
... = a₂::t₂ : by rewrite t₂_eq
end ext
theorem nodup_of_perm_of_nodup {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ :=
assume h, perm.induction_on h
(λ h, h)
(λ a l₁ l₂ p ih nd,
have nodup l₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons nd,
have nodup l₂, from ih this,
have a ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons nd,
have a ∉ l₂, from suppose a ∈ l₂, absurd (mem_perm (perm.symm p) this) `a ∉ l₁`,
nodup_cons `a ∉ l₂` `nodup l₂`)
(λ x y l₁ nd,
have nodup (x::l₁), from nodup_of_nodup_cons nd,
have nodup l₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons this,
have x ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons `nodup (x::l₁)`,
have y ∉ x::l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons nd,
have x ≠ y, using this, from suppose x = y, begin subst x, exact absurd !mem_cons `y ∉ y::l₁` end,
have y ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_cons `y ∉ x::l₁`,
have x ∉ y::l₁, from not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem `x ≠ y` `x ∉ l₁`,
have nodup (y::l₁), from nodup_cons `y ∉ l₁` `nodup l₁`,
show nodup (x::y::l₁), from nodup_cons `x ∉ y::l₁` `nodup (y::l₁)`)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ ih₁ ih₂ nd, ih₂ (ih₁ nd))
/- product -/
section product
theorem perm_product_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list B) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (product l₁ t₁) ~ (product l₂ t₁) :=
assume p : l₁ ~ l₂, perm.induction_on p
!perm.refl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, perm_app (perm.refl (map _ t₁)) r)
(λ x y l,
let m₁ := map (λ b, (x, b)) t₁ in
let m₂ := map (λ b, (y, b)) t₁ in
let c := product l t₁ in
calc m₂ ++ (m₁ ++ c) = (m₂ ++ m₁) ++ c : by rewrite append.assoc
... ~ (m₁ ++ m₂) ++ c : perm_app !perm_app_comm !perm.refl
... = m₁ ++ (m₂ ++ c) : by rewrite append.assoc)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm_product_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list B} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (product l t₁) ~ (product l t₂) :=
list.induction_on l
(λ p, by rewrite [*nil_product])
(λ a t r p,
perm_app (perm_map _ p) (r p))
theorem perm_product [congr] {l₁ l₂ : list A} {t₁ t₂ : list B} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (product l₁ t₁) ~ (product l₂ t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_product_left t₁ p₁) (perm_product_right l₂ p₂)
end product
/- filter -/
theorem perm_filter [congr] {l₁ l₂ : list A} {p : A → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
l₁ ~ l₂ → (filter p l₁) ~ (filter p l₂) :=
assume u, perm.induction_on u
perm.nil
(take x l₁' l₂',
assume u' : l₁' ~ l₂',
assume u'' : filter p l₁' ~ filter p l₂',
decidable.by_cases
(suppose p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_pos _ this]; apply perm.skip; apply u'')
(suppose ¬ p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_neg _ this]; apply u''))
(take x y l,
decidable.by_cases
(assume H1 : p x,
decidable.by_cases
(assume H2 : p y,
begin
rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ H1, *filter_cons_of_pos _ H2, filter_cons_of_pos _ H1],
apply perm.swap
end)
(assume H2 : ¬ p y,
by rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ H1, *filter_cons_of_neg _ H2, filter_cons_of_pos _ H1]))
(assume H1 : ¬ p x,
decidable.by_cases
(assume H2 : p y,
by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ H1, *filter_cons_of_pos _ H2, filter_cons_of_neg _ H1])
(assume H2 : ¬ p y,
by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ H1, *filter_cons_of_neg _ H2, filter_cons_of_neg _ H1])))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
section count
variable [decA : decidable_eq A]
include decA
theorem count_eq_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → ∀ a, count a l₁ = count a l₂ :=
suppose l₁ ~ l₂, perm.induction_on this
(λ a, rfl)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p h a, by rewrite [*count_cons, *h a])
(λ x y l a, by_cases
(suppose a = x, by_cases
(suppose a = y, begin subst x, subst y end)
(suppose a ≠ y, begin subst x, rewrite [count_cons_of_ne this, *count_cons_eq, count_cons_of_ne this] end))
(suppose a ≠ x, by_cases
(suppose a = y, begin subst y, rewrite [count_cons_of_ne this, *count_cons_eq, count_cons_of_ne this] end)
(suppose a ≠ y, begin rewrite [count_cons_of_ne `a≠x`, *count_cons_of_ne `a≠y`, count_cons_of_ne `a≠x`] end)))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ h₁ h₂ a, eq.trans (h₁ a) (h₂ a))
end count
end perm
|
2a31f3f1165b3371de8f9b46d04be932bc486f4d | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/geometry/manifold/partition_of_unity.lean | 8d129b488da36c47455a15acbacc5a18a1baa47b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,475 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import geometry.manifold.algebra.structures
import geometry.manifold.bump_function
import topology.metric_space.partition_of_unity
import topology.shrinking_lemma
/-!
# Smooth partition of unity
In this file we define two structures, `smooth_bump_covering` and `smooth_partition_of_unity`. Both
structures describe coverings of a set by a locally finite family of supports of smooth functions
with some additional properties. The former structure is mostly useful as an intermediate step in
the construction of a smooth partition of unity but some proofs that traditionally deal with a
partition of unity can use a `smooth_bump_covering` as well.
Given a real manifold `M` and its subset `s`, a `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` is a collection of
`smooth_bump_function`s `f i` indexed by `i : ι` such that
* the center of each `f i` belongs to `s`;
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, there exists `i : ι` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`.
In the same settings, a `smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s` is a collection of smooth nonnegative
functions `f i : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯`, `i : ι`, such that
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for each `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one.
We say that `f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
We prove that on a smooth finitely dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology,
for any `U : M → set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. Then we use this fact to prove a similar statement about smooth partitions of
unity, see `smooth_partition_of_unity.exists_is_subordinate`.
Finally, we use existence of a partition of unity to prove lemma
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local` that allows us to construct a globally defined smooth
function from local functions.
## TODO
* Build a framework for to transfer local definitions to global using partition of unity and use it
to define, e.g., the integral of a differential form over a manifold. Lemma
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local` is a first step in this direction.
## Tags
smooth bump function, partition of unity
-/
universes uι uE uH uM uF
open function filter finite_dimensional set
open_locale topological_space manifold classical filter big_operators
noncomputable theory
variables {ι : Type uι}
{E : Type uE} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [finite_dimensional ℝ E]
{F : Type uF} [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space ℝ F]
{H : Type uH} [topological_space H] (I : model_with_corners ℝ E H)
{M : Type uM} [topological_space M] [charted_space H M] [smooth_manifold_with_corners I M]
/-!
### Covering by supports of smooth bump functions
In this section we define `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` to be a collection of
`smooth_bump_function`s such that their supports is a locally finite family of sets and for each `x
∈ s` some function `f i` from the collection is equal to `1` in a neighborhood of `x`. A covering of
this type is useful to construct a smooth partition of unity and can be used instead of a partition
of unity in some proofs.
We prove that on a smooth finite dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology, for
any `U : M → set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. Then we use this fact to prove a version of the Whitney embedding theorem: any
compact real manifold can be embedded into `ℝ^n` for large enough `n`. -/
variables (ι M)
/-- We say that a collection of `smooth_bump_function`s is a `smooth_bump_covering` of a set `s` if
* `(f i).c ∈ s` for all `i`;
* the family `λ i, support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each point `x ∈ s` there exists `i` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`;
in other words, `x` belongs to the interior of `{y | f i y = 1}`;
If `M` is a finite dimensional real manifold which is a `σ`-compact Hausdorff topological space,
then for every covering `U : M → set M`, `∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x`, there exists a `smooth_bump_covering`
subordinate to `U`, see `smooth_bump_covering.exists_is_subordinate`.
This covering can be used, e.g., to construct a partition of unity and to prove the weak
Whitney embedding theorem. -/
@[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure smooth_bump_covering (s : set M := univ) :=
(c : ι → M)
(to_fun : Π i, smooth_bump_function I (c i))
(c_mem' : ∀ i, c i ∈ s)
(locally_finite' : locally_finite (λ i, support (to_fun i)))
(eventually_eq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, to_fun i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1)
/-- We say that that a collection of functions form a smooth partition of unity on a set `s` if
* all functions are infinitely smooth and nonnegative;
* the family `λ i, support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for all `x ∈ s` the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for all `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one. -/
structure smooth_partition_of_unity (s : set M := univ) :=
(to_fun : ι → C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯)
(locally_finite' : locally_finite (λ i, support (to_fun i)))
(nonneg' : ∀ i x, 0 ≤ to_fun i x)
(sum_eq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∑ᶠ i, to_fun i x = 1)
(sum_le_one' : ∀ x, ∑ᶠ i, to_fun i x ≤ 1)
variables {ι I M}
namespace smooth_partition_of_unity
variables {s : set M} (f : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s) {n : ℕ∞}
instance {s : set M} : has_coe_to_fun (smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s)
(λ _, ι → C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯) :=
⟨smooth_partition_of_unity.to_fun⟩
protected lemma locally_finite : locally_finite (λ i, support (f i)) :=
f.locally_finite'
lemma nonneg (i : ι) (x : M) : 0 ≤ f i x := f.nonneg' i x
lemma sum_eq_one {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x = 1 := f.sum_eq_one' x hx
lemma sum_le_one (x : M) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x ≤ 1 := f.sum_le_one' x
/-- Reinterpret a smooth partition of unity as a continuous partition of unity. -/
def to_partition_of_unity : partition_of_unity ι M s :=
{ to_fun := λ i, f i, .. f }
lemma smooth_sum : smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x) :=
smooth_finsum (λ i, (f i).smooth) f.locally_finite
lemma le_one (i : ι) (x : M) : f i x ≤ 1 := f.to_partition_of_unity.le_one i x
lemma sum_nonneg (x : M) : 0 ≤ ∑ᶠ i, f i x := f.to_partition_of_unity.sum_nonneg x
lemma cont_mdiff_smul {g : M → F} {i} (hg : ∀ x ∈ tsupport (f i), cont_mdiff_at I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n g x) :
cont_mdiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (λ x, f i x • g x) :=
cont_mdiff_of_support $ λ x hx, ((f i).cont_mdiff.cont_mdiff_at.of_le le_top).smul $ hg x $
tsupport_smul_subset_left _ _ hx
lemma smooth_smul {g : M → F} {i} (hg : ∀ x ∈ tsupport (f i), smooth_at I 𝓘(ℝ, F) g x) :
smooth I 𝓘(ℝ, F) (λ x, f i x • g x) :=
f.cont_mdiff_smul hg
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of
functions such that `g i` is $C^n$ smooth at every point of the topological support of `f i`, then
the sum `λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is smooth on the whole manifold. -/
lemma cont_mdiff_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F}
(hg : ∀ i (x ∈ tsupport (f i)), cont_mdiff_at I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) x) :
cont_mdiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) :=
cont_mdiff_finsum (λ i, f.cont_mdiff_smul (hg i)) $ f.locally_finite.subset $
λ i, support_smul_subset_left _ _
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of
functions such that `g i` is smooth at every point of the topological support of `f i`, then the sum
`λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is smooth on the whole manifold. -/
lemma smooth_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F}
(hg : ∀ i (x ∈ tsupport (f i)), smooth_at I 𝓘(ℝ, F) (g i) x) :
smooth I 𝓘(ℝ, F) (λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) :=
f.cont_mdiff_finsum_smul hg
lemma finsum_smul_mem_convex {g : ι → M → F} {t : set F} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hg : ∀ i, f i x ≠ 0 → g i x ∈ t) (ht : convex ℝ t) :
∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x ∈ t :=
ht.finsum_mem (λ i, f.nonneg _ _) (f.sum_eq_one hx) hg
/-- A smooth partition of unity `f i` is subordinate to a family of sets `U i` indexed by the same
type if for each `i` the closure of the support of `f i` is a subset of `U i`. -/
def is_subordinate (f : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s) (U : ι → set M) :=
∀ i, tsupport (f i) ⊆ U i
variables {f} {U : ι → set M}
@[simp] lemma is_subordinate_to_partition_of_unity :
f.to_partition_of_unity.is_subordinate U ↔ f.is_subordinate U :=
iff.rfl
alias is_subordinate_to_partition_of_unity ↔ _ is_subordinate.to_partition_of_unity
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : set M` subordinate to a family of open sets
`U : ι → set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of functions such that `g i` is $C^n$ smooth on
`U i`, then the sum `λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is $C^n$ smooth on the whole manifold. -/
lemma is_subordinate.cont_mdiff_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F} (hf : f.is_subordinate U)
(ho : ∀ i, is_open (U i)) (hg : ∀ i, cont_mdiff_on I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) (U i)) :
cont_mdiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) :=
f.cont_mdiff_finsum_smul $ λ i x hx, (hg i).cont_mdiff_at $ (ho i).mem_nhds (hf i hx)
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : set M` subordinate to a family of open sets
`U : ι → set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of functions such that `g i` is smooth on `U i`,
then the sum `λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is smooth on the whole manifold. -/
lemma is_subordinate.smooth_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F} (hf : f.is_subordinate U)
(ho : ∀ i, is_open (U i)) (hg : ∀ i, smooth_on I 𝓘(ℝ, F) (g i) (U i)) :
smooth I 𝓘(ℝ, F) (λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) :=
hf.cont_mdiff_finsum_smul ho hg
end smooth_partition_of_unity
namespace bump_covering
-- Repeat variables to drop [finite_dimensional ℝ E] and [smooth_manifold_with_corners I M]
lemma smooth_to_partition_of_unity {E : Type uE} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [topological_space H] {I : model_with_corners ℝ E H}
{M : Type uM} [topological_space M] [charted_space H M] {s : set M}
(f : bump_covering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) (i : ι) :
smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f.to_partition_of_unity i) :=
(hf i).mul $ smooth_finprod_cond (λ j _, smooth_const.sub (hf j)) $
by { simp only [mul_support_one_sub], exact f.locally_finite }
variables {s : set M}
/-- A `bump_covering` such that all functions in this covering are smooth generates a smooth
partition of unity.
In our formalization, not every `f : bump_covering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a
`smooth_bump_covering`; instead, a `smooth_bump_covering` is a covering by supports of
`smooth_bump_function`s. So, we define `bump_covering.to_smooth_partition_of_unity`, then reuse it
in `smooth_bump_covering.to_smooth_partition_of_unity`. -/
def to_smooth_partition_of_unity (f : bump_covering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) :
smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s :=
{ to_fun := λ i, ⟨f.to_partition_of_unity i, f.smooth_to_partition_of_unity hf i⟩,
.. f.to_partition_of_unity }
@[simp] lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_to_partition_of_unity (f : bump_covering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) :
(f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf).to_partition_of_unity = f.to_partition_of_unity :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_smooth_partition_of_unity (f : bump_covering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) (i : ι) :
⇑(f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf i) = f.to_partition_of_unity i :=
rfl
lemma is_subordinate.to_smooth_partition_of_unity {f : bump_covering ι M s}
{U : ι → set M} (h : f.is_subordinate U) (hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) :
(f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf).is_subordinate U :=
h.to_partition_of_unity
end bump_covering
namespace smooth_bump_covering
variables {s : set M} {U : M → set M} (fs : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s) {I}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (smooth_bump_covering ι I M s)
(λ x, Π (i : ι), smooth_bump_function I (x.c i)) :=
⟨to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (c : ι → M) (to_fun : Π i, smooth_bump_function I (c i))
(h₁ h₂ h₃) : ⇑(mk c to_fun h₁ h₂ h₃ : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s) = to_fun :=
rfl
/--
We say that `f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
-/
def is_subordinate {s : set M} (f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s) (U : M → set M) :=
∀ i, tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f.c i)
lemma is_subordinate.support_subset {fs : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s} {U : M → set M}
(h : fs.is_subordinate U) (i : ι) :
support (fs i) ⊆ U (fs.c i) :=
subset.trans subset_closure (h i)
variable (I)
/-- Let `M` be a smooth manifold with corners modelled on a finite dimensional real vector space.
Suppose also that `M` is a Hausdorff `σ`-compact topological space. Let `s` be a closed set
in `M` and `U : M → set M` be a collection of sets such that `U x ∈ 𝓝 x` for every `x ∈ s`.
Then there exists a smooth bump covering of `s` that is subordinate to `U`. -/
lemma exists_is_subordinate [t2_space M] [sigma_compact_space M] (hs : is_closed s)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ (ι : Type uM) (f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s), f.is_subordinate U :=
begin
-- First we deduce some missing instances
haveI : locally_compact_space H := I.locally_compact,
haveI : locally_compact_space M := charted_space.locally_compact H M,
haveI : normal_space M := normal_of_paracompact_t2,
-- Next we choose a covering by supports of smooth bump functions
have hB := λ x hx, smooth_bump_function.nhds_basis_support I (hU x hx),
rcases refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis_set hs hB
with ⟨ι, c, f, hf, hsub', hfin⟩, choose hcs hfU using hf,
/- Then we use the shrinking lemma to get a covering by smaller open -/
rcases exists_subset_Union_closed_subset hs (λ i, (f i).open_support)
(λ x hx, hfin.point_finite x) hsub' with ⟨V, hsV, hVc, hVf⟩,
choose r hrR hr using λ i, (f i).exists_r_pos_lt_subset_ball (hVc i) (hVf i),
refine ⟨ι, ⟨c, λ i, (f i).update_r (r i) (hrR i), hcs, _, λ x hx, _⟩, λ i, _⟩,
{ simpa only [smooth_bump_function.support_update_r] },
{ refine (mem_Union.1 $ hsV hx).imp (λ i hi, _),
exact ((f i).update_r _ _).eventually_eq_one_of_dist_lt
((f i).support_subset_source $ hVf _ hi) (hr i hi).2 },
{ simpa only [coe_mk, smooth_bump_function.support_update_r, tsupport] using hfU i }
end
variables {I M}
protected lemma locally_finite : locally_finite (λ i, support (fs i)) := fs.locally_finite'
protected lemma point_finite (x : M) : {i | fs i x ≠ 0}.finite :=
fs.locally_finite.point_finite x
lemma mem_chart_at_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (chart_at H (fs.c i)).source :=
(fs i).support_subset_source $ by simp [h]
lemma mem_ext_chart_at_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (ext_chart_at I (fs.c i)).source :=
by { rw ext_chart_at_source, exact fs.mem_chart_at_source_of_eq_one h }
/-- Index of a bump function such that `fs i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`. -/
def ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : ι := (fs.eventually_eq_one' x hx).some
lemma eventually_eq_one (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 :=
(fs.eventually_eq_one' x hx).some_spec
lemma apply_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) x = 1 :=
(fs.eventually_eq_one x hx).eq_of_nhds
lemma mem_support_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : x ∈ support (fs $ fs.ind x hx) :=
by simp [fs.apply_ind x hx]
lemma mem_chart_at_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) :
x ∈ (chart_at H (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_chart_at_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
lemma mem_ext_chart_at_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) :
x ∈ (ext_chart_at I (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_ext_chart_at_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
/-- The index type of a `smooth_bump_covering` of a compact manifold is finite. -/
protected def fintype [compact_space M] : fintype ι :=
fs.locally_finite.fintype_of_compact $ λ i, (fs i).nonempty_support
variable [t2_space M]
/-- Reinterpret a `smooth_bump_covering` as a continuous `bump_covering`. Note that not every
`f : bump_covering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a `smooth_bump_covering`. -/
def to_bump_covering : bump_covering ι M s :=
{ to_fun := λ i, ⟨fs i, (fs i).continuous⟩,
locally_finite' := fs.locally_finite,
nonneg' := λ i x, (fs i).nonneg,
le_one' := λ i x, (fs i).le_one,
eventually_eq_one' := fs.eventually_eq_one' }
@[simp] lemma is_subordinate_to_bump_covering {f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s} {U : M → set M} :
f.to_bump_covering.is_subordinate (λ i, U (f.c i)) ↔ f.is_subordinate U :=
iff.rfl
alias is_subordinate_to_bump_covering ↔ _ is_subordinate.to_bump_covering
/-- Every `smooth_bump_covering` defines a smooth partition of unity. -/
def to_smooth_partition_of_unity : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s :=
fs.to_bump_covering.to_smooth_partition_of_unity (λ i, (fs i).smooth)
lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_apply (i : ι) (x : M) :
fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x = fs i x * ∏ᶠ j (hj : well_ordering_rel j i), (1 - fs j x) :=
rfl
lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_eq_mul_prod (i : ι) (x : M) (t : finset ι)
(ht : ∀ j, well_ordering_rel j i → fs j x ≠ 0 → j ∈ t) :
fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x =
fs i x * ∏ j in t.filter (λ j, well_ordering_rel j i), (1 - fs j x) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.to_partition_of_unity_eq_mul_prod i x t ht
lemma exists_finset_to_smooth_partition_of_unity_eventually_eq (i : ι) (x : M) :
∃ t : finset ι, fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i =ᶠ[𝓝 x]
fs i * ∏ j in t.filter (λ j, well_ordering_rel j i), (1 - fs j) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.exists_finset_to_partition_of_unity_eventually_eq i x
lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_zero_of_zero {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 0) :
fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x = 0 :=
fs.to_bump_covering.to_partition_of_unity_zero_of_zero h
lemma support_to_smooth_partition_of_unity_subset (i : ι) :
support (fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i) ⊆ support (fs i) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.support_to_partition_of_unity_subset i
lemma is_subordinate.to_smooth_partition_of_unity {f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s} {U : M → set M}
(h : f.is_subordinate U) :
f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity.is_subordinate (λ i, U (f.c i)) :=
h.to_bump_covering.to_partition_of_unity
lemma sum_to_smooth_partition_of_unity_eq (x : M) :
∑ᶠ i, fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x = 1 - ∏ᶠ i, (1 - fs i x) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.sum_to_partition_of_unity_eq x
end smooth_bump_covering
variable (I)
/-- Given two disjoint closed sets in a Hausdorff σ-compact finite dimensional manifold, there
exists an infinitely smooth function that is equal to `0` on one of them and is equal to one on the
other. -/
lemma exists_smooth_zero_one_of_closed [t2_space M] [sigma_compact_space M] {s t : set M}
(hs : is_closed s) (ht : is_closed t) (hd : disjoint s t) :
∃ f : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯, eq_on f 0 s ∧ eq_on f 1 t ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
begin
have : ∀ x ∈ t, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x, from λ x hx, hs.is_open_compl.mem_nhds (disjoint_right.1 hd hx),
rcases smooth_bump_covering.exists_is_subordinate I ht this with ⟨ι, f, hf⟩,
set g := f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity,
refine ⟨⟨_, g.smooth_sum⟩, λ x hx, _, λ x, g.sum_eq_one, λ x, ⟨g.sum_nonneg x, g.sum_le_one x⟩⟩,
suffices : ∀ i, g i x = 0,
by simp only [this, cont_mdiff_map.coe_fn_mk, finsum_zero, pi.zero_apply],
refine λ i, f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity_zero_of_zero _,
exact nmem_support.1 (subset_compl_comm.1 (hf.support_subset i) hx)
end
namespace smooth_partition_of_unity
/-- A `smooth_partition_of_unity` that consists of a single function, uniformly equal to one,
defined as an example for `inhabited` instance. -/
def single (i : ι) (s : set M) : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s :=
(bump_covering.single i s).to_smooth_partition_of_unity $ λ j,
begin
rcases eq_or_ne j i with rfl|h,
{ simp only [smooth_one, continuous_map.coe_one, bump_covering.coe_single, pi.single_eq_same] },
{ simp only [smooth_zero, bump_covering.coe_single, pi.single_eq_of_ne h,
continuous_map.coe_zero] }
end
instance [inhabited ι] (s : set M) : inhabited (smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s) :=
⟨single I default s⟩
variables [t2_space M] [sigma_compact_space M]
/-- If `X` is a paracompact normal topological space and `U` is an open covering of a closed set
`s`, then there exists a `bump_covering ι X s` that is subordinate to `U`. -/
lemma exists_is_subordinate {s : set M} (hs : is_closed s) (U : ι → set M) (ho : ∀ i, is_open (U i))
(hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s, f.is_subordinate U :=
begin
haveI : locally_compact_space H := I.locally_compact,
haveI : locally_compact_space M := charted_space.locally_compact H M,
haveI : normal_space M := normal_of_paracompact_t2,
rcases bump_covering.exists_is_subordinate_of_prop (smooth I 𝓘(ℝ)) _ hs U ho hU
with ⟨f, hf, hfU⟩,
{ exact ⟨f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf, hfU.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf⟩ },
{ intros s t hs ht hd,
rcases exists_smooth_zero_one_of_closed I hs ht hd with ⟨f, hf⟩,
exact ⟨f, f.smooth, hf⟩ }
end
end smooth_partition_of_unity
variables [sigma_compact_space M] [t2_space M] {t : M → set F} {n : ℕ∞}
/-- Let `M` be a σ-compact Hausdorff finite dimensional topological manifold. Let `t : M → set F`
be a family of convex sets. Suppose that for each point `x : M` there exists a neighborhood
`U ∈ 𝓝 x` and a function `g : M → F` such that `g` is $C^n$ smooth on `U` and `g y ∈ t y` for all
`y ∈ U`. Then there exists a $C^n$ smooth function `g : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, F), F⟯` such that `g x ∈ t x`
for all `x`. See also `exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local` and
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local_const`. -/
lemma exists_cont_mdiff_forall_mem_convex_of_local (ht : ∀ x, convex ℝ (t x))
(Hloc : ∀ x : M, ∃ (U ∈ 𝓝 x) (g : M → F), cont_mdiff_on I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n g U ∧ ∀ y ∈ U, g y ∈ t y) :
∃ g : C^n⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, F), F⟯, ∀ x, g x ∈ t x :=
begin
choose U hU g hgs hgt using Hloc,
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := smooth_partition_of_unity.exists_is_subordinate I is_closed_univ
(λ x, interior (U x)) (λ x, is_open_interior)
(λ x hx, mem_Union.2 ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hU x)⟩),
refine ⟨⟨λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x,
hf.cont_mdiff_finsum_smul (λ i, is_open_interior) $ λ i, (hgs i).mono interior_subset⟩,
λ x, f.finsum_smul_mem_convex (mem_univ x) (λ i hi, hgt _ _ _) (ht _)⟩,
exact interior_subset (hf _ $ subset_closure hi)
end
/-- Let `M` be a σ-compact Hausdorff finite dimensional topological manifold. Let `t : M → set F`
be a family of convex sets. Suppose that for each point `x : M` there exists a neighborhood
`U ∈ 𝓝 x` and a function `g : M → F` such that `g` is smooth on `U` and `g y ∈ t y` for all `y ∈ U`.
Then there exists a smooth function `g : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, F), F⟯` such that `g x ∈ t x` for all `x`.
See also `exists_cont_mdiff_forall_mem_convex_of_local` and
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local_const`. -/
lemma exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local (ht : ∀ x, convex ℝ (t x))
(Hloc : ∀ x : M, ∃ (U ∈ 𝓝 x) (g : M → F), smooth_on I 𝓘(ℝ, F) g U ∧ ∀ y ∈ U, g y ∈ t y) :
∃ g : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, F), F⟯, ∀ x, g x ∈ t x :=
exists_cont_mdiff_forall_mem_convex_of_local I ht Hloc
/-- Let `M` be a σ-compact Hausdorff finite dimensional topological manifold. Let `t : M → set F` be
a family of convex sets. Suppose that for each point `x : M` there exists a vector `c : F` such that
for all `y` in a neighborhood of `x` we have `c ∈ t y`. Then there exists a smooth function
`g : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, F), F⟯` such that `g x ∈ t x` for all `x`. See also
`exists_cont_mdiff_forall_mem_convex_of_local` and `exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local`. -/
lemma exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local_const (ht : ∀ x, convex ℝ (t x))
(Hloc : ∀ x : M, ∃ c : F, ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, c ∈ t y) :
∃ g : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, F), F⟯, ∀ x, g x ∈ t x :=
exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local I ht $ λ x,
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := Hloc x in ⟨_, hc, λ _, c, smooth_on_const, λ y, id⟩
/-- Let `M` be a smooth σ-compact manifold with extended distance. Let `K : ι → set M` be a locally
finite family of closed sets, let `U : ι → set M` be a family of open sets such that `K i ⊆ U i` for
all `i`. Then there exists a positive smooth function `δ : M → ℝ≥0` such that for any `i` and
`x ∈ K i`, we have `emetric.closed_ball x (δ x) ⊆ U i`. -/
lemma emetric.exists_smooth_forall_closed_ball_subset {M} [emetric_space M] [charted_space H M]
[smooth_manifold_with_corners I M] [sigma_compact_space M] {K : ι → set M}
{U : ι → set M} (hK : ∀ i, is_closed (K i)) (hU : ∀ i, is_open (U i)) (hKU : ∀ i, K i ⊆ U i)
(hfin : locally_finite K) :
∃ δ : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, ℝ), ℝ⟯, (∀ x, 0 < δ x) ∧
∀ i (x ∈ K i), emetric.closed_ball x (ennreal.of_real (δ x)) ⊆ U i :=
by simpa only [mem_inter_eq, forall_and_distrib, mem_preimage, mem_Inter, @forall_swap ι M]
using exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local_const I
emetric.exists_forall_closed_ball_subset_aux₂
(emetric.exists_forall_closed_ball_subset_aux₁ hK hU hKU hfin)
/-- Let `M` be a smooth σ-compact manifold with a metric. Let `K : ι → set M` be a locally finite
family of closed sets, let `U : ι → set M` be a family of open sets such that `K i ⊆ U i` for all
`i`. Then there exists a positive smooth function `δ : M → ℝ≥0` such that for any `i` and `x ∈ K i`,
we have `metric.closed_ball x (δ x) ⊆ U i`. -/
lemma metric.exists_smooth_forall_closed_ball_subset {M} [metric_space M] [charted_space H M]
[smooth_manifold_with_corners I M] [sigma_compact_space M] {K : ι → set M}
{U : ι → set M} (hK : ∀ i, is_closed (K i)) (hU : ∀ i, is_open (U i)) (hKU : ∀ i, K i ⊆ U i)
(hfin : locally_finite K) :
∃ δ : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ, ℝ), ℝ⟯, (∀ x, 0 < δ x) ∧ ∀ i (x ∈ K i), metric.closed_ball x (δ x) ⊆ U i :=
begin
rcases emetric.exists_smooth_forall_closed_ball_subset I hK hU hKU hfin with ⟨δ, hδ0, hδ⟩,
refine ⟨δ, hδ0, λ i x hx, _⟩,
rw [← metric.emetric_closed_ball (hδ0 _).le],
exact hδ i x hx
end
|
8fb651024842049bc9a7c4c9a71bf4b22f2e7ad1 | 5cb186111bc6de231aef3b26698e9235da128bb0 | /move.lean | 6698ccc913b3cfabb744c51b2b37c7bb268f3044 | [] | no_license | Kha/syntax | 2f96982b920a24d9bdbbb48ad6acce1817e62f26 | af05028581955d9fd5af99be9cbb82f5c9226551 | refs/heads/master | 1,631,456,662,519 | 1,523,806,396,000 | 1,523,978,266,000 | 110,000,924 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,928 | lean | -- non-meta instance
attribute [derive decidable_eq] name
universes u v w
namespace name
-- TODO: make original non-meta by making decidable_eq instance non-meta
def replace_prefix' : name → name → name → name
| anonymous p p' := anonymous
| (mk_string s c) p p' := if c = p then mk_string s p' else mk_string s (replace_prefix' c p p')
| (mk_numeral v c) p p' := if c = p then mk_numeral v p' else mk_numeral v (replace_prefix' c p p')
@[simp] protected def quick_lt : name → name → Prop
| anonymous anonymous := false
| anonymous _ := true
| (mk_numeral v n) (mk_numeral v' n') := v < v' ∨ v = v' ∧ n.quick_lt n'
| (mk_numeral _ _) (mk_string _ _) := true
| (mk_string s n) (mk_string s' n') := s < s' ∨ s = s' ∧ n.quick_lt n'
| _ _ := false
instance decidable_rel_quick_lt : decidable_rel name.quick_lt :=
begin
intros n n',
induction n generalizing n',
case anonymous {
by_cases n' = anonymous; simp *; apply_instance
},
all_goals { cases n'; {
tactic.unfreeze_local_instances, -- use recursive instance
simp; apply_instance } }
end
protected def has_lt_quick : has_lt name := ⟨name.quick_lt⟩
end name
namespace option
variables {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop)
@[simp] protected def lt : option α → option α → Prop
| none (some x) := true
| (some x) (some y) := r x y
| _ _ := false
instance decidable_rel_lt [decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (option.lt r) :=
by intros a b; cases a; cases b; simp; apply_instance
protected def has_lt [has_lt α] : has_lt (option α) := ⟨option.lt (<)⟩
end option
namespace rbmap
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w} {lt : α → α → Prop}
open format prod
variables [has_to_format α] [has_to_format β]
private meta def format_key_data (a : α) (b : β) (first : bool) : format :=
(if first then to_fmt "" else to_fmt "," ++ line) ++ to_fmt a ++ space ++ to_fmt "←" ++ space ++ to_fmt b
private meta def to_format (m : rbmap α β lt) : format :=
group $ to_fmt "⟨" ++ nest 1 (fst (fold (λ a b p, (fst p ++ format_key_data a b (snd p), ff)) m (to_fmt "", tt))) ++
to_fmt "⟩"
meta instance : has_to_format (rbmap α β lt) :=
⟨to_format⟩
end rbmap
namespace list
section
parameters {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
def pmap : Π (xs : list α), (Π (x : α), x ∈ xs → β) → list β
| [] f := []
| (a :: l) f := f a (mem_cons_self a l) :: pmap l (λ x h, f x (mem_cons_of_mem a h))
end
end list
namespace monad
def kleisli {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α β γ : Type u} : (α → m β) → (β → m γ) → (α → m γ) :=
λ a b, (>>= b) ∘ a
infixr ` >=> `:55 := kleisli
end monad
def unreachable {α m} [monad m] [monad_except string m] : m α :=
throw "unreachable"
|
76a0e015fa0c30242613309f7fddf69a37c895c2 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/ring_theory/localization/integer.lean | 512ea6a21df5ef57f904f2559690173d3d2bc84f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,390 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import ring_theory.localization.basic
/-!
# Integer elements of a localization
## Main definitions
* `is_localization.is_integer` is a predicate stating that `x : S` is in the image of `R`
## Implementation notes
See `src/ring_theory/localization/basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {M : submonoid R} {S : Type*} [comm_ring S]
variables [algebra R S] {P : Type*} [comm_ring P]
open function
open_locale big_operators
namespace is_localization
section
variables (R) {M S}
-- TODO: define a subalgebra of `is_integer`s
/-- Given `a : S`, `S` a localization of `R`, `is_integer R a` iff `a` is in the image of
the localization map from `R` to `S`. -/
def is_integer (a : S) : Prop := a ∈ (algebra_map R S).range
end
lemma is_integer_zero : is_integer R (0 : S) := subring.zero_mem _
lemma is_integer_one : is_integer R (1 : S) := subring.one_mem _
lemma is_integer_add {a b : S} (ha : is_integer R a) (hb : is_integer R b) :
is_integer R (a + b) :=
subring.add_mem _ ha hb
lemma is_integer_mul {a b : S} (ha : is_integer R a) (hb : is_integer R b) :
is_integer R (a * b) :=
subring.mul_mem _ ha hb
lemma is_integer_smul {a : R} {b : S} (hb : is_integer R b) :
is_integer R (a • b) :=
begin
rcases hb with ⟨b', hb⟩,
use a * b',
rw [←hb, (algebra_map R S).map_mul, algebra.smul_def]
end
variables (M) {S} [is_localization M S]
/-- Each element `a : S` has an `M`-multiple which is an integer.
This version multiplies `a` on the right, matching the argument order in `localization_map.surj`.
-/
lemma exists_integer_multiple' (a : S) :
∃ (b : M), is_integer R (a * algebra_map R S b) :=
let ⟨⟨num, denom⟩, h⟩ := is_localization.surj _ a in ⟨denom, set.mem_range.mpr ⟨num, h.symm⟩⟩
/-- Each element `a : S` has an `M`-multiple which is an integer.
This version multiplies `a` on the left, matching the argument order in the `has_smul` instance.
-/
lemma exists_integer_multiple (a : S) :
∃ (b : M), is_integer R ((b : R) • a) :=
by { simp_rw [algebra.smul_def, mul_comm _ a], apply exists_integer_multiple' }
/-- We can clear the denominators of a `finset`-indexed family of fractions. -/
lemma exist_integer_multiples {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → S) :
∃ (b : M), ∀ i ∈ s, is_localization.is_integer R ((b : R) • f i) :=
begin
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
refine ⟨∏ i in s, (sec M (f i)).2, λ i hi, ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ exact (∏ j in s.erase i, (sec M (f j)).2) * (sec M (f i)).1 },
rw [ring_hom.map_mul, sec_spec', ←mul_assoc, ←(algebra_map R S).map_mul, ← algebra.smul_def],
congr' 2,
refine trans _ ((submonoid.subtype M).map_prod _ _).symm,
rw [mul_comm, ←finset.prod_insert (s.not_mem_erase i), finset.insert_erase hi],
refl
end
/-- We can clear the denominators of a finite indexed family of fractions. -/
lemma exist_integer_multiples_of_finite {ι : Type*} [finite ι] (f : ι → S) :
∃ (b : M), ∀ i, is_localization.is_integer R ((b : R) • f i) :=
begin
casesI nonempty_fintype ι,
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := exist_integer_multiples M finset.univ f,
exact ⟨b, λ i, hb i (finset.mem_univ _)⟩
end
/-- We can clear the denominators of a finite set of fractions. -/
lemma exist_integer_multiples_of_finset (s : finset S) :
∃ (b : M), ∀ a ∈ s, is_integer R ((b : R) • a) :=
exist_integer_multiples M s id
/-- A choice of a common multiple of the denominators of a `finset`-indexed family of fractions. -/
noncomputable
def common_denom {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → S) : M :=
(exist_integer_multiples M s f).some
/-- The numerator of a fraction after clearing the denominators
of a `finset`-indexed family of fractions. -/
noncomputable
def integer_multiple {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → S) (i : s) : R :=
((exist_integer_multiples M s f).some_spec i i.prop).some
@[simp]
lemma map_integer_multiple {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → S) (i : s) :
algebra_map R S (integer_multiple M s f i) = common_denom M s f • f i :=
((exist_integer_multiples M s f).some_spec _ i.prop).some_spec
/-- A choice of a common multiple of the denominators of a finite set of fractions. -/
noncomputable
def common_denom_of_finset (s : finset S) : M :=
common_denom M s id
/-- The finset of numerators after clearing the denominators of a finite set of fractions. -/
noncomputable
def finset_integer_multiple [decidable_eq R] (s : finset S) : finset R :=
s.attach.image (λ t, integer_multiple M s id t)
open_locale pointwise
lemma finset_integer_multiple_image [decidable_eq R] (s : finset S) :
algebra_map R S '' (finset_integer_multiple M s) =
common_denom_of_finset M s • s :=
begin
delta finset_integer_multiple common_denom,
rw finset.coe_image,
ext,
split,
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨x, -, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
rw map_integer_multiple,
exact set.mem_image_of_mem _ x.prop },
{ rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, s.mem_attach _, rfl⟩, map_integer_multiple M s id _⟩ }
end
end is_localization
|
f9b79f48da13afc752772d9ce2cd12d8bb4394ea | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/data/polynomial/mirror.lean | 16b41f1eea6b0e2bf8662d0fb56052952b08ab19 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,655 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import algebra.big_operators.nat_antidiagonal
import data.polynomial.ring_division
/-!
# "Mirror" of a univariate polynomial
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we define `polynomial.mirror`, a variant of `polynomial.reverse`. The difference
between `reverse` and `mirror` is that `reverse` will decrease the degree if the polynomial is
divisible by `X`.
## Main definitions
- `polynomial.mirror`
## Main results
- `polynomial.mirror_mul_of_domain`: `mirror` preserves multiplication.
- `polynomial.irreducible_of_mirror`: an irreducibility criterion involving `mirror`
-/
namespace polynomial
open_locale polynomial
section semiring
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] (p q : R[X])
/-- mirror of a polynomial: reverses the coefficients while preserving `polynomial.nat_degree` -/
noncomputable def mirror := p.reverse * X ^ p.nat_trailing_degree
@[simp] lemma mirror_zero : (0 : R[X]).mirror = 0 := by simp [mirror]
lemma mirror_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) : (monomial n a).mirror = (monomial n a) :=
begin
classical,
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ rw [ha, monomial_zero_right, mirror_zero] },
{ rw [mirror, reverse, nat_degree_monomial n a, if_neg ha, nat_trailing_degree_monomial ha,
← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, rev_at_le (le_refl n), tsub_self, pow_zero,
mul_one] },
end
lemma mirror_C (a : R) : (C a).mirror = C a :=
mirror_monomial 0 a
lemma mirror_X : X.mirror = (X : R[X]) :=
mirror_monomial 1 (1 : R)
lemma mirror_nat_degree : p.mirror.nat_degree = p.nat_degree :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, mirror_zero] },
nontriviality R,
rw [mirror, nat_degree_mul', reverse_nat_degree, nat_degree_X_pow,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le p.nat_trailing_degree_le_nat_degree],
rwa [leading_coeff_X_pow, mul_one, reverse_leading_coeff, ne, trailing_coeff_eq_zero]
end
lemma mirror_nat_trailing_degree : p.mirror.nat_trailing_degree = p.nat_trailing_degree :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, mirror_zero] },
{ rw [mirror, nat_trailing_degree_mul_X_pow ((mt reverse_eq_zero.mp) hp),
reverse_nat_trailing_degree, zero_add] },
end
lemma coeff_mirror (n : ℕ) :
p.mirror.coeff n = p.coeff (rev_at (p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree) n) :=
begin
by_cases h2 : p.nat_degree < n,
{ rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt (by rwa mirror_nat_degree)],
by_cases h1 : n ≤ p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree,
{ rw [rev_at_le h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_nat_trailing_degree],
exact (tsub_lt_iff_left h1).mpr (nat.add_lt_add_right h2 _) },
{ rw [←rev_at_fun_eq, rev_at_fun, if_neg h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt h2] } },
rw not_lt at h2,
rw [rev_at_le (h2.trans (nat.le_add_right _ _))],
by_cases h3 : p.nat_trailing_degree ≤ n,
{ rw [←tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h2, ←tsub_tsub_assoc h2 h3, mirror, coeff_mul_X_pow',
if_pos h3, coeff_reverse, rev_at_le (tsub_le_self.trans h2)] },
rw not_le at h3,
rw coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt (lt_tsub_iff_right.mpr (nat.add_lt_add_left h3 _)),
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_nat_trailing_degree (by rwa mirror_nat_trailing_degree),
end
--TODO: Extract `finset.sum_range_rev_at` lemma.
lemma mirror_eval_one : p.mirror.eval 1 = p.eval 1 :=
begin
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_range, one_pow, mul_one, mirror_nat_degree],
refine finset.sum_bij_ne_zero _ _ _ _ _,
{ exact λ n hn hp, rev_at (p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree) n },
{ intros n hn hp,
rw finset.mem_range_succ_iff at *,
rw rev_at_le (hn.trans (nat.le_add_right _ _)),
rw [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le, add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_right, ←mirror_nat_trailing_degree],
exact nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero hp },
{ exact λ n₁ n₂ hn₁ hp₁ hn₂ hp₂ h, by rw [←@rev_at_invol _ n₁, h, rev_at_invol] },
{ intros n hn hp,
use rev_at (p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree) n,
refine ⟨_, _, rev_at_invol.symm⟩,
{ rw finset.mem_range_succ_iff at *,
rw rev_at_le (hn.trans (nat.le_add_right _ _)),
rw [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le, add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_right],
exact nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero hp },
{ change p.mirror.coeff _ ≠ 0,
rwa [coeff_mirror, rev_at_invol] } },
{ exact λ n hn hp, p.coeff_mirror n },
end
lemma mirror_mirror : p.mirror.mirror = p :=
polynomial.ext (λ n, by rw [coeff_mirror, coeff_mirror,
mirror_nat_degree, mirror_nat_trailing_degree, rev_at_invol])
variables {p q}
lemma mirror_involutive : function.involutive (mirror : R[X] → R[X]) :=
mirror_mirror
lemma mirror_eq_iff : p.mirror = q ↔ p = q.mirror :=
mirror_involutive.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma mirror_inj : p.mirror = q.mirror ↔ p = q :=
mirror_involutive.injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma mirror_eq_zero : p.mirror = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by rw [←p.mirror_mirror, h, mirror_zero], λ h, by rw [h, mirror_zero]⟩
variables (p q)
@[simp] lemma mirror_trailing_coeff : p.mirror.trailing_coeff = p.leading_coeff :=
by rw [leading_coeff, trailing_coeff, mirror_nat_trailing_degree, coeff_mirror,
rev_at_le (nat.le_add_left _ _), add_tsub_cancel_right]
@[simp] lemma mirror_leading_coeff : p.mirror.leading_coeff = p.trailing_coeff :=
by rw [←p.mirror_mirror, mirror_trailing_coeff, p.mirror_mirror]
lemma coeff_mul_mirror :
(p * p.mirror).coeff (p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree) = p.sum (λ n, (^ 2)) :=
begin
rw [coeff_mul, finset.nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk],
refine (finset.sum_congr rfl (λ n hn, _)).trans (p.sum_eq_of_subset (λ n, (^ 2))
(λ n, zero_pow zero_lt_two) _ (λ n hn, finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mpr
((le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp n hn).trans (nat.le_add_right _ _)))).symm,
rw [coeff_mirror, ←rev_at_le (finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hn), rev_at_invol, ←sq],
end
variables [no_zero_divisors R]
lemma nat_degree_mul_mirror : (p * p.mirror).nat_degree = 2 * p.nat_degree :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, zero_mul, nat_degree_zero, mul_zero] },
rw [nat_degree_mul hp (mt mirror_eq_zero.mp hp), mirror_nat_degree, two_mul],
end
lemma nat_trailing_degree_mul_mirror :
(p * p.mirror).nat_trailing_degree = 2 * p.nat_trailing_degree :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, zero_mul, nat_trailing_degree_zero, mul_zero] },
rw [nat_trailing_degree_mul hp (mt mirror_eq_zero.mp hp), mirror_nat_trailing_degree, two_mul],
end
end semiring
section ring
variables {R : Type*} [ring R] (p q : R[X])
lemma mirror_neg : (-p).mirror = -(p.mirror) :=
by rw [mirror, mirror, reverse_neg, nat_trailing_degree_neg, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
variables [no_zero_divisors R]
lemma mirror_mul_of_domain : (p * q).mirror = p.mirror * q.mirror :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, zero_mul, mirror_zero, zero_mul] },
by_cases hq : q = 0,
{ rw [hq, mul_zero, mirror_zero, mul_zero] },
rw [mirror, mirror, mirror, reverse_mul_of_domain, nat_trailing_degree_mul hp hq, pow_add],
rw [mul_assoc, ←mul_assoc q.reverse],
conv_lhs { congr, skip, congr, rw [←X_pow_mul] },
repeat { rw [mul_assoc], },
end
lemma mirror_smul (a : R) : (a • p).mirror = a • p.mirror :=
by rw [←C_mul', ←C_mul', mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_C]
end ring
section comm_ring
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [no_zero_divisors R] {f : R[X]}
lemma irreducible_of_mirror (h1 : ¬ is_unit f)
(h2 : ∀ k, f * f.mirror = k * k.mirror → k = f ∨ k = -f ∨ k = f.mirror ∨ k = -f.mirror)
(h3 : ∀ g, g ∣ f → g ∣ f.mirror → is_unit g) : irreducible f :=
begin
split,
{ exact h1 },
{ intros g h fgh,
let k := g * h.mirror,
have key : f * f.mirror = k * k.mirror,
{ rw [fgh, mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_mirror,
mul_assoc, mul_comm h, mul_comm g.mirror, mul_assoc, ←mul_assoc] },
have g_dvd_f : g ∣ f,
{ rw fgh,
exact dvd_mul_right g h },
have h_dvd_f : h ∣ f,
{ rw fgh,
exact dvd_mul_left h g },
have g_dvd_k : g ∣ k,
{ exact dvd_mul_right g h.mirror },
have h_dvd_k_rev : h ∣ k.mirror,
{ rw [mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_mirror],
exact dvd_mul_left h g.mirror },
have hk := h2 k key,
rcases hk with hk | hk | hk | hk,
{ exact or.inr (h3 h h_dvd_f (by rwa ← hk)) },
{ exact or.inr (h3 h h_dvd_f (by rwa [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr hk, mirror_neg, dvd_neg])) },
{ exact or.inl (h3 g g_dvd_f (by rwa ← hk)) },
{ exact or.inl (h3 g g_dvd_f (by rwa [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr hk, dvd_neg])) } },
end
end comm_ring
end polynomial
|
d30007870ce63ad5b2a7ed817478fd4d7780b321 | 491068d2ad28831e7dade8d6dff871c3e49d9431 | /tests/lean/run/fib_brec.lean | ecd88c82bf94278b1096dd2ff54b667d1b4964bd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | davidmueller13/lean | 65a3ed141b4088cd0a268e4de80eb6778b21a0e9 | c626e2e3c6f3771e07c32e82ee5b9e030de5b050 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,278,313,401 | 1,444,021,177,000 | 1,444,021,177,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,091 | lean | import data.nat.basic data.prod
open prod
namespace nat
namespace manual
definition brec_on {C : nat → Type} (n : nat) (F : Π (n : nat), @nat.below C n → C n) : C n :=
have general : C n × @nat.below C n, from
nat.rec_on n
(pair (F zero poly_unit.star) poly_unit.star)
(λ (n₁ : nat) (r₁ : C n₁ × @nat.below C n₁),
have b : @nat.below C (succ n₁), from
r₁,
have c : C (succ n₁), from
F (succ n₁) b,
pair c b),
pr₁ general
end manual
definition fib (n : nat) :=
nat.brec_on n (λ (n : nat),
nat.cases_on n
(λ (b₀ : nat.below zero), succ zero)
(λ (n₁ : nat), nat.cases_on n₁
(λ b₁ : nat.below (succ zero), succ zero)
(λ (n₂ : nat) (b₂ : nat.below (succ (succ n₂))), pr₁ b₂ + pr₁ (pr₂ b₂))))
theorem fib_0 : fib 0 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem fib_1 : fib 1 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem fib_s_s (n : nat) : fib (succ (succ n)) = fib (succ n) + fib n :=
rfl
example : fib 5 = 8 :=
rfl
example : fib 9 = 55 :=
rfl
end nat
|
379c32ddbeab98f2f637d9b5bff36da4d9fc8b0a | 26ac254ecb57ffcb886ff709cf018390161a9225 | /src/data/multiset/intervals.lean | db4bb4fee79c38aaf4ef0db2a3f4d99ce1afb4e1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/mathlib | 42842584f584359bbe1fc8b88b3ff937c8acd72d | d0df6b81cd0920ad569158c06a3fd5abb9e63301 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,546,404,255 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 281,173,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,263,582,000 | 1,595,263,581,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,467 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.multiset.nodup
import data.list.intervals
/-!
# Intervals in ℕ as multisets
For now this only covers `Ico n m`, the "closed-open" interval containing `[n, ..., m-1]`.
-/
namespace multiset
open list
/-! ### Ico -/
/-- `Ico n m` is the multiset lifted from the list `Ico n m`, e.g. the set `{n, n+1, ..., m-1}`. -/
def Ico (n m : ℕ) : multiset ℕ := Ico n m
namespace Ico
theorem map_add (n m k : ℕ) : (Ico n m).map ((+) k) = Ico (n + k) (m + k) :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.map_add _ _ _
theorem map_sub (n m k : ℕ) (h : k ≤ n) : (Ico n m).map (λ x, x - k) = Ico (n - k) (m - k) :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.map_sub _ _ _ h
theorem zero_bot (n : ℕ) : Ico 0 n = range n :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.zero_bot _
@[simp] theorem card (n m : ℕ) : (Ico n m).card = m - n :=
list.Ico.length _ _
theorem nodup (n m : ℕ) : nodup (Ico n m) := Ico.nodup _ _
@[simp] theorem mem {n m l : ℕ} : l ∈ Ico n m ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m :=
list.Ico.mem
theorem eq_zero_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Ico n m = 0 :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.eq_nil_of_le h
@[simp] theorem self_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : Ico n n = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_le $ le_refl n
@[simp] theorem eq_zero_iff {n m : ℕ} : Ico n m = 0 ↔ m ≤ n :=
iff.trans (coe_eq_zero _) list.Ico.eq_empty_iff
lemma add_consecutive {n m l : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hml : m ≤ l) :
Ico n m + Ico m l = Ico n l :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.append_consecutive hnm hml
@[simp] lemma inter_consecutive (n m l : ℕ) : Ico n m ∩ Ico m l = 0 :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.bag_inter_consecutive n m l
@[simp] theorem succ_singleton {n : ℕ} : Ico n (n+1) = {n} :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.succ_singleton
theorem succ_top {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : Ico n (m + 1) = m :: Ico n m :=
by rw [Ico, list.Ico.succ_top h, ← coe_add, add_comm]; refl
theorem eq_cons {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : Ico n m = n :: Ico (n + 1) m :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.eq_cons h
@[simp] theorem pred_singleton {m : ℕ} (h : 0 < m) : Ico (m - 1) m = {m - 1} :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.pred_singleton h
@[simp] theorem not_mem_top {n m : ℕ} : m ∉ Ico n m :=
list.Ico.not_mem_top
lemma filter_lt_of_top_le {n m l : ℕ} (hml : m ≤ l) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = Ico n m :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_lt_of_top_le hml
lemma filter_lt_of_le_bot {n m l : ℕ} (hln : l ≤ n) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = ∅ :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_lt_of_le_bot hln
lemma filter_lt_of_ge {n m l : ℕ} (hlm : l ≤ m) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = Ico n l :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_lt_of_ge hlm
@[simp] lemma filter_lt (n m l : ℕ) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = Ico n (min m l) :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_lt n m l
lemma filter_le_of_le_bot {n m l : ℕ} (hln : l ≤ n) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = Ico n m :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_le_of_le_bot hln
lemma filter_le_of_top_le {n m l : ℕ} (hml : m ≤ l) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = ∅ :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_le_of_top_le hml
lemma filter_le_of_le {n m l : ℕ} (hnl : n ≤ l) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = Ico l m :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_le_of_le hnl
@[simp] lemma filter_le (n m l : ℕ) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = Ico (max n l) m :=
congr_arg coe $ list.Ico.filter_le n m l
end Ico
end multiset
|
e406ac002f9bba156f48c75dac156542340f2b7d | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/geometry/euclidean/monge_point.lean | 6fa7a0dc05769c53add54b4470bab095f02d4950 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,586 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import geometry.euclidean.circumcenter
/-!
# Monge point and orthocenter
This file defines the orthocenter of a triangle, via its n-dimensional
generalization, the Monge point of a simplex.
## Main definitions
* `monge_point` is the Monge point of a simplex, defined in terms of
its position on the Euler line and then shown to be the point of
concurrence of the Monge planes.
* `monge_plane` is a Monge plane of an (n+2)-simplex, which is the
(n+1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an n-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude).
* `altitude` is the line that passes through a vertex of a simplex and
is orthogonal to the opposite face.
* `orthocenter` is defined, for the case of a triangle, to be the same
as its Monge point, then shown to be the point of concurrence of the
altitudes.
* `orthocentric_system` is a predicate on sets of points that says
whether they are four points, one of which is the orthocenter of the
other three (in which case various other properties hold, including
that each is the orthocenter of the other three).
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altitude_(triangle)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monge_point>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthocentric_system>
* Małgorzata Buba-Brzozowa, [The Monge Point and the 3(n+1) Point
Sphere of an
n-Simplex](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f8b/0f623459c76dac2e49255737f8f0f4725d16.pdf)
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators
open_locale classical
open_locale real
open_locale real_inner_product_space
namespace affine
namespace simplex
open finset affine_subspace euclidean_geometry points_with_circumcenter_index
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
/-- The Monge point of a simplex (in 2 or more dimensions) is a
generalization of the orthocenter of a triangle. It is defined to be
the intersection of the Monge planes, where a Monge plane is the
(n-1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an (n-2)-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude). The circumcenter O, centroid G and Monge point
M are collinear in that order on the Euler line, with OG : GM = (n-1)
: 2. Here, we use that ratio to define the Monge point (so resulting
in a point that equals the centroid in 0 or 1 dimensions), and then
show in subsequent lemmas that the point so defined lies in the Monge
planes and is their unique point of intersection. -/
def monge_point {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
(((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / (((n - 1) : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : finset (fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter
/-- The position of the Monge point in relation to the circumcenter
and centroid. -/
lemma monge_point_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) :
s.monge_point = (((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / (((n - 1) : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : finset (fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The Monge point lies in the affine span. -/
lemma monge_point_mem_affine_span {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) :
s.monge_point ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points) :=
smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _
(centroid_mem_affine_span_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (card_fin (n + 1)))
s.circumcenter_mem_affine_span
s.circumcenter_mem_affine_span
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same Monge point. -/
lemma monge_point_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : simplex ℝ P n}
(h : set.range s₁.points = set.range s₂.points) : s₁.monge_point = s₂.monge_point :=
by simp_rw [monge_point_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter, centroid_eq_of_range_eq h,
circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq h]
omit V
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`points_with_circumcenter`. -/
def monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter (n : ℕ) : points_with_circumcenter_index (n + 2) → ℝ
| (point_index i) := (((n + 1) : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹
| circumcenter_index := (-2 / (((n + 1) : ℕ) : ℝ))
/-- `monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp] lemma sum_monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter n i = 1 :=
begin
simp_rw [sum_points_with_circumcenter, monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter, sum_const,
card_fin, nsmul_eq_mul],
have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0,
{ exact_mod_cast nat.succ_ne_zero _ },
field_simp [hn1],
ring
end
include V
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`points_with_circumcenter`. -/
lemma monge_point_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) :
s.monge_point = (univ : finset (points_with_circumcenter_index (n + 2))).affine_combination
s.points_with_circumcenter (monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter n) :=
begin
rw [monge_point_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter,
centroid_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter,
affine_combination_vsub, ←linear_map.map_smul,
weighted_vsub_vadd_affine_combination],
congr' with i,
rw [pi.add_apply, pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, pi.sub_apply],
have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0,
{ exact_mod_cast nat.succ_ne_zero _ },
cases i;
simp_rw [centroid_weights_with_circumcenter, circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter,
monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter];
rw [nat.add_sub_assoc (dec_trivial : 1 ≤ 2), (dec_trivial : 2 - 1 = 1)],
{ rw [if_pos (mem_univ _), sub_zero, add_zero, card_fin],
have hn3 : (n + 2 + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0,
{ exact_mod_cast nat.succ_ne_zero _ },
field_simp [hn1, hn3, mul_comm] },
{ field_simp [hn1],
ring }
end
omit V
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the
centroid of an n-dimensional face, in terms of
`points_with_circumcenter`. This definition is only valid when `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)) :
points_with_circumcenter_index (n + 2) → ℝ
| (point_index i) := if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then (((n + 1) : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenter_index := (-2 / (((n + 1) : ℕ) : ℝ))
/-- `monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter` is the
result of subtracting `centroid_weights_with_circumcenter` from
`monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter`. -/
lemma monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter_eq_sub {n : ℕ}
{i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter i₁ i₂ =
monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter n -
centroid_weights_with_circumcenter ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ) :=
begin
ext i,
cases i,
{ rw [pi.sub_apply, monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter, centroid_weights_with_circumcenter,
monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter],
have hu : card ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : finset (fin (n + 3))) = n + 1,
{ simp [card_compl, fintype.card_fin, h] },
rw hu,
by_cases hi : i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂;
simp [compl_eq_univ_sdiff, hi] },
{ simp [monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter, centroid_weights_with_circumcenter,
monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter] }
end
/-- `monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 0. -/
@[simp] lemma sum_monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ}
{i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
∑ i, monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 0 :=
begin
rw monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter_eq_sub h,
simp_rw [pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib, sum_monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter],
rw [sum_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter, sub_self],
simp [←card_pos, card_compl, h]
end
include V
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
n-dimensional face, in terms of `points_with_circumcenter`. -/
lemma monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weighted_vsub_of_points_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
s.monge_point -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : finset (fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : finset (points_with_circumcenter_index (n + 2))).weighted_vsub
s.points_with_circumcenter (monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter i₁ i₂) :=
by simp_rw [monge_point_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter,
centroid_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter,
affine_combination_vsub,
monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter_eq_sub h]
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
n-dimensional face, is orthogonal to the difference of the two
vertices not in that face. -/
lemma inner_monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_vsub {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2))
{i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
⟪s.monge_point -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : finset (fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points,
s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂⟫ = 0 :=
begin
simp_rw [monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weighted_vsub_of_points_with_circumcenter s h,
point_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter,
affine_combination_vsub],
have hs : ∑ i, (point_weights_with_circumcenter i₁ - point_weights_with_circumcenter i₂) i = 0,
{ simp },
rw [inner_weighted_vsub _ (sum_monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter h) _ hs,
sum_points_with_circumcenter, points_with_circumcenter_eq_circumcenter],
simp only [monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter,
points_with_circumcenter_point],
let fs : finset (fin (n + 3)) := {i₁, i₂},
have hfs : ∀ i : fin (n + 3),
i ∉ fs → (i ≠ i₁ ∧ i ≠ i₂),
{ intros i hi,
split ; { intro hj, simpa [←hj] using hi } },
rw ←sum_subset fs.subset_univ _,
{ simp_rw [sum_points_with_circumcenter, points_with_circumcenter_eq_circumcenter,
points_with_circumcenter_point, pi.sub_apply, point_weights_with_circumcenter],
rw [←sum_subset fs.subset_univ _],
{ simp_rw [sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), sum_singleton],
repeat { rw ←sum_subset fs.subset_univ _ },
{ simp_rw [sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), sum_singleton],
simp [h, h.symm, dist_comm (s.points i₁)] },
all_goals { intros i hu hi, simp [hfs i hi] } },
{ intros i hu hi,
simp [hfs i hi, point_weights_with_circumcenter] } },
{ intros i hu hi,
simp [hfs i hi] }
end
/-- A Monge plane of an (n+2)-simplex is the (n+1)-dimensional affine
subspace of the subspace spanned by the simplex that passes through
the centroid of an n-dimensional face and is orthogonal to the
opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the same as an altitude).
This definition is only intended to be used when `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def monge_plane {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)) :
affine_subspace ℝ P :=
mk' (({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : finset (fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points)
(ℝ ∙ (s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂))ᗮ ⊓
affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points)
/-- The definition of a Monge plane. -/
lemma monge_plane_def {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)) :
s.monge_plane i₁ i₂ = mk' (({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : finset (fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points)
(ℝ ∙ (s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂))ᗮ ⊓
affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points) :=
rfl
/-- The Monge plane associated with vertices `i₁` and `i₂` equals that
associated with `i₂` and `i₁`. -/
lemma monge_plane_comm {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)) :
s.monge_plane i₁ i₂ = s.monge_plane i₂ i₁ :=
begin
simp_rw monge_plane_def,
congr' 3,
{ congr' 1,
exact insert_singleton_comm _ _ },
{ ext,
simp_rw submodule.mem_span_singleton,
split,
all_goals { rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩, use -r, rw [neg_smul, ←smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] } }
end
/-- The Monge point lies in the Monge planes. -/
lemma monge_point_mem_monge_plane {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : s.monge_point ∈ s.monge_plane i₁ i₂ :=
begin
rw [monge_plane_def, mem_inf_iff, ←vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (self_mem_mk' _ _),
direction_mk', submodule.mem_orthogonal'],
refine ⟨_, s.monge_point_mem_affine_span⟩,
intros v hv,
rcases submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hv with ⟨r, rfl⟩,
rw [inner_smul_right, s.inner_monge_point_vsub_face_centroid_vsub h, mul_zero]
end
-- This doesn't actually need the `i₁ ≠ i₂` hypothesis, but it's
-- convenient for the proof and `monge_plane` isn't intended to be
-- useful without that hypothesis.
/-- The direction of a Monge plane. -/
lemma direction_monge_plane {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
(s.monge_plane i₁ i₂).direction = (ℝ ∙ (s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂))ᗮ ⊓
vector_span ℝ (set.range s.points) :=
by rw [monge_plane_def, direction_inf_of_mem_inf (s.monge_point_mem_monge_plane h), direction_mk',
direction_affine_span]
/-- The Monge point is the only point in all the Monge planes from any
one vertex. -/
lemma eq_monge_point_of_forall_mem_monge_plane {n : ℕ} {s : simplex ℝ P (n + 2)}
{i₁ : fin (n + 3)} {p : P} (h : ∀ i₂, i₁ ≠ i₂ → p ∈ s.monge_plane i₁ i₂) :
p = s.monge_point :=
begin
rw ←@vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
have h' : ∀ i₂, i₁ ≠ i₂ → p -ᵥ s.monge_point ∈
(ℝ ∙ (s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂))ᗮ ⊓ vector_span ℝ (set.range s.points),
{ intros i₂ hne,
rw [←s.direction_monge_plane hne,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (s.monge_point_mem_monge_plane hne)],
exact h i₂ hne },
have hi : p -ᵥ s.monge_point ∈ ⨅ (i₂ : {i // i₁ ≠ i}),
(ℝ ∙ (s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂))ᗮ,
{ rw submodule.mem_infi,
exact λ i, (submodule.mem_inf.1 (h' i i.property)).1 },
rw [submodule.infi_orthogonal, ←submodule.span_Union] at hi,
have hu : (⋃ (i : {i // i₁ ≠ i}), ({s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i} : set V)) =
(-ᵥ) (s.points i₁) '' (s.points '' (set.univ \ {i₁})),
{ rw [set.image_image],
ext x,
simp_rw [set.mem_Union, set.mem_image, set.mem_singleton_iff, set.mem_diff_singleton],
split,
{ rintros ⟨i, rfl⟩,
use [i, ⟨set.mem_univ _, i.property.symm⟩] },
{ rintros ⟨i, ⟨hiu, hi⟩, rfl⟩,
use [⟨i, hi.symm⟩, rfl] } },
rw [hu, ←vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne ℝ _ (set.mem_univ _),
set.image_univ] at hi,
have hv : p -ᵥ s.monge_point ∈ vector_span ℝ (set.range s.points),
{ let s₁ : finset (fin (n + 3)) := univ.erase i₁,
obtain ⟨i₂, h₂⟩ :=
card_pos.1 (show 0 < card s₁, by simp [card_erase_of_mem]),
have h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂ := (ne_of_mem_erase h₂).symm,
exact (submodule.mem_inf.1 (h' i₂ h₁₂)).2 },
exact submodule.disjoint_def.1 ((vector_span ℝ (set.range s.points)).orthogonal_disjoint)
_ hv hi,
end
/-- An altitude of a simplex is the line that passes through a vertex
and is orthogonal to the opposite face. -/
def altitude {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : fin (n + 2)) : affine_subspace ℝ P :=
mk' (s.points i) (affine_span ℝ (s.points '' ↑(univ.erase i))).directionᗮ ⊓
affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points)
/-- The definition of an altitude. -/
lemma altitude_def {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : fin (n + 2)) :
s.altitude i = mk' (s.points i)
(affine_span ℝ (s.points '' ↑(univ.erase i))).directionᗮ ⊓
affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points) :=
rfl
/-- A vertex lies in the corresponding altitude. -/
lemma mem_altitude {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : fin (n + 2)) :
s.points i ∈ s.altitude i :=
(mem_inf_iff _ _ _).2 ⟨self_mem_mk' _ _, mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _)⟩
/-- The direction of an altitude. -/
lemma direction_altitude {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : fin (n + 2)) :
(s.altitude i).direction = (vector_span ℝ (s.points '' ↑(finset.univ.erase i)))ᗮ ⊓
vector_span ℝ (set.range s.points) :=
by rw [altitude_def,
direction_inf_of_mem (self_mem_mk' (s.points i) _)
(mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _)), direction_mk', direction_affine_span,
direction_affine_span]
/-- The vector span of the opposite face lies in the direction
orthogonal to an altitude. -/
lemma vector_span_le_altitude_direction_orthogonal {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1))
(i : fin (n + 2)) :
vector_span ℝ (s.points '' ↑(finset.univ.erase i)) ≤ (s.altitude i).directionᗮ :=
begin
rw direction_altitude,
exact le_trans
(vector_span ℝ (s.points '' ↑(finset.univ.erase i))).le_orthogonal_orthogonal
(submodule.orthogonal_le inf_le_left)
end
open finite_dimensional
/-- An altitude is finite-dimensional. -/
instance finite_dimensional_direction_altitude {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1))
(i : fin (n + 2)) : finite_dimensional ℝ ((s.altitude i).direction) :=
begin
rw direction_altitude,
apply_instance
end
/-- An altitude is one-dimensional (i.e., a line). -/
@[simp] lemma finrank_direction_altitude {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) (i : fin (n + 2)) :
finrank ℝ ((s.altitude i).direction) = 1 :=
begin
rw direction_altitude,
have h := submodule.finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal
(vector_span_mono ℝ (set.image_subset_range s.points ↑(univ.erase i))),
have hc : card (univ.erase i) = n + 1, { rw card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ _), simp },
rw [finrank_vector_span_of_affine_independent s.independent (fintype.card_fin _),
finrank_vector_span_image_finset_of_affine_independent s.independent hc] at h,
simpa using h
end
/-- A line through a vertex is the altitude through that vertex if and
only if it is orthogonal to the opposite face. -/
lemma affine_span_insert_singleton_eq_altitude_iff {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1))
(i : fin (n + 2)) (p : P) :
affine_span ℝ {p, s.points i} = s.altitude i ↔ (p ≠ s.points i ∧
p ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points) ∧
p -ᵥ s.points i ∈ (affine_span ℝ (s.points '' ↑(finset.univ.erase i))).directionᗮ) :=
begin
rw [eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem
(mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (set.mem_singleton _))) (s.mem_altitude _),
←vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self i)) p,
direction_affine_span, direction_affine_span, direction_affine_span],
split,
{ intro h,
split,
{ intro heq,
rw [heq, set.pair_eq_singleton, vector_span_singleton] at h,
have hd : finrank ℝ (s.altitude i).direction = 0,
{ rw [←h, finrank_bot] },
simpa using hd },
{ rw [←submodule.mem_inf, inf_comm, ←direction_altitude, ←h],
exact vsub_mem_vector_span ℝ (set.mem_insert _ _)
(set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (set.mem_singleton _)) } },
{ rintro ⟨hne, h⟩,
rw [←submodule.mem_inf, inf_comm, ←direction_altitude] at h,
rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne ℝ (set.mem_insert _ _),
set.insert_diff_of_mem _ (set.mem_singleton _),
set.diff_singleton_eq_self (λ h, hne (set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h)), set.image_singleton],
refine eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq _ _,
{ rw submodule.span_le,
simpa using h },
{ rw [finrank_direction_altitude, finrank_span_set_eq_card],
{ simp },
{ refine linear_independent_singleton _,
simpa using hne } } }
end
end simplex
namespace triangle
open euclidean_geometry finset simplex affine_subspace finite_dimensional
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
/-- The orthocenter of a triangle is the intersection of its
altitudes. It is defined here as the 2-dimensional case of the
Monge point. -/
def orthocenter (t : triangle ℝ P) : P := t.monge_point
/-- The orthocenter equals the Monge point. -/
lemma orthocenter_eq_monge_point (t : triangle ℝ P) : t.orthocenter = t.monge_point := rfl
/-- The position of the orthocenter in relation to the circumcenter
and centroid. -/
lemma orthocenter_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter (t : triangle ℝ P) :
t.orthocenter = (3 : ℝ) •
((univ : finset (fin 3)).centroid ℝ t.points -ᵥ t.circumcenter : V) +ᵥ t.circumcenter :=
begin
rw [orthocenter_eq_monge_point, monge_point_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter],
norm_num
end
/-- The orthocenter lies in the affine span. -/
lemma orthocenter_mem_affine_span (t : triangle ℝ P) :
t.orthocenter ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range t.points) :=
t.monge_point_mem_affine_span
/-- Two triangles with the same points have the same orthocenter. -/
lemma orthocenter_eq_of_range_eq {t₁ t₂ : triangle ℝ P}
(h : set.range t₁.points = set.range t₂.points) : t₁.orthocenter = t₂.orthocenter :=
monge_point_eq_of_range_eq h
/-- In the case of a triangle, altitudes are the same thing as Monge
planes. -/
lemma altitude_eq_monge_plane (t : triangle ℝ P) {i₁ i₂ i₃ : fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂)
(h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) : t.altitude i₁ = t.monge_plane i₂ i₃ :=
begin
have hs : ({i₂, i₃}ᶜ : finset (fin 3)) = {i₁}, by dec_trivial!,
have he : univ.erase i₁ = {i₂, i₃}, by dec_trivial!,
rw [monge_plane_def, altitude_def, direction_affine_span, hs, he, centroid_singleton,
coe_insert, coe_singleton,
vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne ℝ _ (set.mem_insert i₂ _)],
simp [h₂₃, submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The orthocenter lies in the altitudes. -/
lemma orthocenter_mem_altitude (t : triangle ℝ P) {i₁ : fin 3} :
t.orthocenter ∈ t.altitude i₁ :=
begin
obtain ⟨i₂, i₃, h₁₂, h₂₃, h₁₃⟩ : ∃ i₂ i₃, i₁ ≠ i₂ ∧ i₂ ≠ i₃ ∧ i₁ ≠ i₃, by dec_trivial!,
rw [orthocenter_eq_monge_point, t.altitude_eq_monge_plane h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃],
exact t.monge_point_mem_monge_plane h₂₃
end
/-- The orthocenter is the only point lying in any two of the
altitudes. -/
lemma eq_orthocenter_of_forall_mem_altitude {t : triangle ℝ P} {i₁ i₂ : fin 3} {p : P}
(h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (h₁ : p ∈ t.altitude i₁) (h₂ : p ∈ t.altitude i₂) : p = t.orthocenter :=
begin
obtain ⟨i₃, h₂₃, h₁₃⟩ : ∃ i₃, i₂ ≠ i₃ ∧ i₁ ≠ i₃, { clear h₁ h₂, dec_trivial! },
rw t.altitude_eq_monge_plane h₁₃ h₁₂ h₂₃.symm at h₁,
rw t.altitude_eq_monge_plane h₂₃ h₁₂.symm h₁₃.symm at h₂,
rw orthocenter_eq_monge_point,
have ha : ∀ i, i₃ ≠ i → p ∈ t.monge_plane i₃ i,
{ intros i hi,
have hi₁₂ : i₁ = i ∨ i₂ = i, { clear h₁ h₂, dec_trivial! },
cases hi₁₂,
{ exact hi₁₂ ▸ h₂ },
{ exact hi₁₂ ▸ h₁ } },
exact eq_monge_point_of_forall_mem_monge_plane ha
end
/-- The distance from the orthocenter to the reflection of the
circumcenter in a side equals the circumradius. -/
lemma dist_orthocenter_reflection_circumcenter (t : triangle ℝ P) {i₁ i₂ : fin 3} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
dist t.orthocenter (reflection (affine_span ℝ (t.points '' {i₁, i₂})) t.circumcenter) =
t.circumradius :=
begin
rw [←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg t.circumradius_nonneg,
t.reflection_circumcenter_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter h,
t.orthocenter_eq_monge_point,
monge_point_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter,
dist_affine_combination t.points_with_circumcenter
(sum_monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter _)
(sum_reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter h)],
simp_rw [sum_points_with_circumcenter, pi.sub_apply, monge_point_weights_with_circumcenter,
reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter],
have hu : ({i₁, i₂} : finset (fin 3)) ⊆ univ := subset_univ _,
obtain ⟨i₃, hi₃, hi₃₁, hi₃₂⟩ :
∃ i₃, univ \ ({i₁, i₂} : finset (fin 3)) = {i₃} ∧ i₃ ≠ i₁ ∧ i₃ ≠ i₂, by dec_trivial!,
simp_rw [←sum_sdiff hu, hi₃],
simp [hi₃₁, hi₃₂],
norm_num
end
/-- The distance from the orthocenter to the reflection of the
circumcenter in a side equals the circumradius, variant using a
`finset`. -/
lemma dist_orthocenter_reflection_circumcenter_finset (t : triangle ℝ P) {i₁ i₂ : fin 3}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
dist t.orthocenter (reflection (affine_span ℝ (t.points '' ↑({i₁, i₂} : finset (fin 3))))
t.circumcenter) =
t.circumradius :=
by { convert dist_orthocenter_reflection_circumcenter _ h, simp }
/-- The affine span of the orthocenter and a vertex is contained in
the altitude. -/
lemma affine_span_orthocenter_point_le_altitude (t : triangle ℝ P) (i : fin 3) :
affine_span ℝ {t.orthocenter, t.points i} ≤ t.altitude i :=
begin
refine span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe _,
rw [set.insert_subset, set.singleton_subset_iff],
exact ⟨t.orthocenter_mem_altitude, t.mem_altitude i⟩
end
/-- Suppose we are given a triangle `t₁`, and replace one of its
vertices by its orthocenter, yielding triangle `t₂` (with vertices not
necessarily listed in the same order). Then an altitude of `t₂` from
a vertex that was not replaced is the corresponding side of `t₁`. -/
lemma altitude_replace_orthocenter_eq_affine_span {t₁ t₂ : triangle ℝ P} {i₁ i₂ i₃ j₁ j₂ j₃ : fin 3}
(hi₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (hi₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (hi₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) (hj₁₂ : j₁ ≠ j₂) (hj₁₃ : j₁ ≠ j₃)
(hj₂₃ : j₂ ≠ j₃) (h₁ : t₂.points j₁ = t₁.orthocenter) (h₂ : t₂.points j₂ = t₁.points i₂)
(h₃ : t₂.points j₃ = t₁.points i₃) :
t₂.altitude j₂ = affine_span ℝ {t₁.points i₁, t₁.points i₂} :=
begin
symmetry,
rw [←h₂, t₂.affine_span_insert_singleton_eq_altitude_iff],
rw [h₂],
use (injective_of_affine_independent t₁.independent).ne hi₁₂,
have he : affine_span ℝ (set.range t₂.points) = affine_span ℝ (set.range t₁.points),
{ refine ext_of_direction_eq _
⟨t₁.points i₃, mem_affine_span ℝ ⟨j₃, h₃⟩, mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _)⟩,
refine eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq (direction_le (span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe _)) _,
{ have hu : (finset.univ : finset (fin 3)) = {j₁, j₂, j₃}, { clear h₁ h₂ h₃, dec_trivial! },
rw [←set.image_univ, ←finset.coe_univ, hu, finset.coe_insert, finset.coe_insert,
finset.coe_singleton, set.image_insert_eq, set.image_insert_eq, set.image_singleton,
h₁, h₂, h₃, set.insert_subset, set.insert_subset, set.singleton_subset_iff],
exact ⟨t₁.orthocenter_mem_affine_span,
mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _),
mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _)⟩ },
{ rw [direction_affine_span, direction_affine_span,
finrank_vector_span_of_affine_independent t₁.independent (fintype.card_fin _),
finrank_vector_span_of_affine_independent t₂.independent (fintype.card_fin _)] } },
rw he,
use mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _),
have hu : finset.univ.erase j₂ = {j₁, j₃}, { clear h₁ h₂ h₃, dec_trivial! },
rw [hu, finset.coe_insert, finset.coe_singleton, set.image_insert_eq, set.image_singleton,
h₁, h₃],
have hle : (t₁.altitude i₃).directionᗮ ≤
(affine_span ℝ ({t₁.orthocenter, t₁.points i₃} : set P)).directionᗮ :=
submodule.orthogonal_le (direction_le (affine_span_orthocenter_point_le_altitude _ _)),
refine hle ((t₁.vector_span_le_altitude_direction_orthogonal i₃) _),
have hui : finset.univ.erase i₃ = {i₁, i₂}, { clear hle h₂ h₃, dec_trivial! },
rw [hui, finset.coe_insert, finset.coe_singleton, set.image_insert_eq, set.image_singleton],
refine vsub_mem_vector_span ℝ (set.mem_insert _ _)
(set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (set.mem_singleton _))
end
/-- Suppose we are given a triangle `t₁`, and replace one of its
vertices by its orthocenter, yielding triangle `t₂` (with vertices not
necessarily listed in the same order). Then the orthocenter of `t₂`
is the vertex of `t₁` that was replaced. -/
lemma orthocenter_replace_orthocenter_eq_point {t₁ t₂ : triangle ℝ P} {i₁ i₂ i₃ j₁ j₂ j₃ : fin 3}
(hi₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (hi₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (hi₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) (hj₁₂ : j₁ ≠ j₂) (hj₁₃ : j₁ ≠ j₃)
(hj₂₃ : j₂ ≠ j₃) (h₁ : t₂.points j₁ = t₁.orthocenter) (h₂ : t₂.points j₂ = t₁.points i₂)
(h₃ : t₂.points j₃ = t₁.points i₃) :
t₂.orthocenter = t₁.points i₁ :=
begin
refine (triangle.eq_orthocenter_of_forall_mem_altitude hj₂₃ _ _).symm,
{ rw altitude_replace_orthocenter_eq_affine_span hi₁₂ hi₁₃ hi₂₃ hj₁₂ hj₁₃ hj₂₃ h₁ h₂ h₃,
exact mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_insert _ _) },
{ rw altitude_replace_orthocenter_eq_affine_span hi₁₃ hi₁₂ hi₂₃.symm hj₁₃ hj₁₂ hj₂₃.symm h₁ h₃ h₂,
exact mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_insert _ _) }
end
end triangle
end affine
namespace euclidean_geometry
open affine affine_subspace finite_dimensional
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
/-- Four points form an orthocentric system if they consist of the
vertices of a triangle and its orthocenter. -/
def orthocentric_system (s : set P) : Prop :=
∃ t : triangle ℝ P,
t.orthocenter ∉ set.range t.points ∧ s = insert t.orthocenter (set.range t.points)
/-- This is an auxiliary lemma giving information about the relation
of two triangles in an orthocentric system; it abstracts some
reasoning, with no geometric content, that is common to some other
lemmas. Suppose the orthocentric system is generated by triangle `t`,
and we are given three points `p` in the orthocentric system. Then
either we can find indices `i₁`, `i₂` and `i₃` for `p` such that `p
i₁` is the orthocenter of `t` and `p i₂` and `p i₃` are points `j₂`
and `j₃` of `t`, or `p` has the same points as `t`. -/
lemma exists_of_range_subset_orthocentric_system {t : triangle ℝ P}
(ho : t.orthocenter ∉ set.range t.points) {p : fin 3 → P}
(hps : set.range p ⊆ insert t.orthocenter (set.range t.points)) (hpi : function.injective p) :
(∃ (i₁ i₂ i₃ j₂ j₃ : fin 3), i₁ ≠ i₂ ∧ i₁ ≠ i₃ ∧ i₂ ≠ i₃ ∧
(∀ i : fin 3, i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ ∨ i = i₃) ∧ p i₁ = t.orthocenter ∧ j₂ ≠ j₃ ∧
t.points j₂ = p i₂ ∧ t.points j₃ = p i₃) ∨ set.range p = set.range t.points :=
begin
by_cases h : t.orthocenter ∈ set.range p,
{ left,
rcases h with ⟨i₁, h₁⟩,
obtain ⟨i₂, i₃, h₁₂, h₁₃, h₂₃, h₁₂₃⟩ :
∃ (i₂ i₃ : fin 3), i₁ ≠ i₂ ∧ i₁ ≠ i₃ ∧ i₂ ≠ i₃ ∧ ∀ i : fin 3, i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ ∨ i = i₃,
{ clear h₁, dec_trivial! },
have h : ∀ i, i₁ ≠ i → ∃ (j : fin 3), t.points j = p i,
{ intros i hi,
replace hps := set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
(set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (set.mem_range_self i) hps) (h₁ ▸ hpi.ne hi.symm),
exact hps },
rcases h i₂ h₁₂ with ⟨j₂, h₂⟩,
rcases h i₃ h₁₃ with ⟨j₃, h₃⟩,
have hj₂₃ : j₂ ≠ j₃,
{ intro he,
rw [he, h₃] at h₂,
exact h₂₃.symm (hpi h₂) },
exact ⟨i₁, i₂, i₃, j₂, j₃, h₁₂, h₁₃, h₂₃, h₁₂₃, h₁, hj₂₃, h₂, h₃⟩ },
{ right,
have hs := set.subset_diff_singleton hps h,
rw set.insert_diff_self_of_not_mem ho at hs,
refine set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs _,
rw [set.card_range_of_injective hpi,
set.card_range_of_injective (injective_of_affine_independent t.independent)] }
end
/-- For any three points in an orthocentric system generated by
triangle `t`, there is a point in the subspace spanned by the triangle
from which the distance of all those three points equals the circumradius. -/
lemma exists_dist_eq_circumradius_of_subset_insert_orthocenter {t : triangle ℝ P}
(ho : t.orthocenter ∉ set.range t.points) {p : fin 3 → P}
(hps : set.range p ⊆ insert t.orthocenter (set.range t.points)) (hpi : function.injective p) :
∃ c ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range t.points), ∀ p₁ ∈ set.range p, dist p₁ c = t.circumradius :=
begin
rcases exists_of_range_subset_orthocentric_system ho hps hpi with
⟨i₁, i₂, i₃, j₂, j₃, h₁₂, h₁₃, h₂₃, h₁₂₃, h₁, hj₂₃, h₂, h₃⟩ | hs,
{ use [reflection (affine_span ℝ (t.points '' {j₂, j₃})) t.circumcenter,
reflection_mem_of_le_of_mem (affine_span_mono ℝ (set.image_subset_range _ _))
t.circumcenter_mem_affine_span],
intros p₁ hp₁,
rcases hp₁ with ⟨i, rfl⟩,
replace h₁₂₃ := h₁₂₃ i,
repeat { cases h₁₂₃ },
{ rw h₁,
exact triangle.dist_orthocenter_reflection_circumcenter t hj₂₃ },
{ rw [←h₂,
dist_reflection_eq_of_mem _
(mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_image_of_mem _ (set.mem_insert _ _)))],
exact t.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ },
{ rw [←h₃,
dist_reflection_eq_of_mem _
(mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_image_of_mem _
(set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (set.mem_singleton _))))],
exact t.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ } },
{ use [t.circumcenter, t.circumcenter_mem_affine_span],
intros p₁ hp₁,
rw hs at hp₁,
rcases hp₁ with ⟨i, rfl⟩,
exact t.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ }
end
/-- Any three points in an orthocentric system are affinely independent. -/
lemma orthocentric_system.affine_independent {s : set P} (ho : orthocentric_system s)
{p : fin 3 → P} (hps : set.range p ⊆ s) (hpi : function.injective p) :
affine_independent ℝ p :=
begin
rcases ho with ⟨t, hto, hst⟩,
rw hst at hps,
rcases exists_dist_eq_circumradius_of_subset_insert_orthocenter hto hps hpi with ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩,
exact cospherical.affine_independent ⟨c, t.circumradius, hc⟩ set.subset.rfl hpi
end
/-- Any three points in an orthocentric system span the same subspace
as the whole orthocentric system. -/
lemma affine_span_of_orthocentric_system {s : set P} (ho : orthocentric_system s)
{p : fin 3 → P} (hps : set.range p ⊆ s) (hpi : function.injective p) :
affine_span ℝ (set.range p) = affine_span ℝ s :=
begin
have ha := ho.affine_independent hps hpi,
rcases ho with ⟨t, hto, hts⟩,
have hs : affine_span ℝ s = affine_span ℝ (set.range t.points),
{ rw [hts, affine_span_insert_eq_affine_span ℝ t.orthocenter_mem_affine_span] },
refine ext_of_direction_eq _
⟨p 0, mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _), mem_affine_span ℝ (hps (set.mem_range_self _))⟩,
have hfd : finite_dimensional ℝ (affine_span ℝ s).direction, { rw hs, apply_instance },
haveI := hfd,
refine eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq (direction_le (affine_span_mono ℝ hps)) _,
rw [hs, direction_affine_span, direction_affine_span,
finrank_vector_span_of_affine_independent ha (fintype.card_fin _),
finrank_vector_span_of_affine_independent t.independent (fintype.card_fin _)]
end
/-- All triangles in an orthocentric system have the same circumradius. -/
lemma orthocentric_system.exists_circumradius_eq {s : set P} (ho : orthocentric_system s) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ t : triangle ℝ P, set.range t.points ⊆ s → t.circumradius = r :=
begin
rcases ho with ⟨t, hto, hts⟩,
use t.circumradius,
intros t₂ ht₂,
have ht₂s := ht₂,
rw hts at ht₂,
rcases exists_dist_eq_circumradius_of_subset_insert_orthocenter hto ht₂
(injective_of_affine_independent t₂.independent) with ⟨c, hc, h⟩,
rw set.forall_range_iff at h,
have hs : set.range t.points ⊆ s,
{ rw hts,
exact set.subset_insert _ _ },
rw [affine_span_of_orthocentric_system ⟨t, hto, hts⟩ hs
(injective_of_affine_independent t.independent),
←affine_span_of_orthocentric_system ⟨t, hto, hts⟩ ht₂s
(injective_of_affine_independent t₂.independent)] at hc,
exact (t₂.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq hc h).symm
end
/-- Given any triangle in an orthocentric system, the fourth point is
its orthocenter. -/
lemma orthocentric_system.eq_insert_orthocenter {s : set P} (ho : orthocentric_system s)
{t : triangle ℝ P} (ht : set.range t.points ⊆ s) :
s = insert t.orthocenter (set.range t.points) :=
begin
rcases ho with ⟨t₀, ht₀o, ht₀s⟩,
rw ht₀s at ht,
rcases exists_of_range_subset_orthocentric_system ht₀o ht
(injective_of_affine_independent t.independent) with
⟨i₁, i₂, i₃, j₂, j₃, h₁₂, h₁₃, h₂₃, h₁₂₃, h₁, hj₂₃, h₂, h₃⟩ | hs,
{ obtain ⟨j₁, hj₁₂, hj₁₃, hj₁₂₃⟩ :
∃ j₁ : fin 3, j₁ ≠ j₂ ∧ j₁ ≠ j₃ ∧ ∀ j : fin 3, j = j₁ ∨ j = j₂ ∨ j = j₃,
{ clear h₂ h₃, dec_trivial! },
suffices h : t₀.points j₁ = t.orthocenter,
{ have hui : (set.univ : set (fin 3)) = {i₁, i₂, i₃}, { ext x, simpa using h₁₂₃ x },
have huj : (set.univ : set (fin 3)) = {j₁, j₂, j₃}, { ext x, simpa using hj₁₂₃ x },
rw [←h, ht₀s, ←set.image_univ, huj, ←set.image_univ, hui],
simp_rw [set.image_insert_eq, set.image_singleton, h₁, ←h₂, ←h₃],
rw set.insert_comm },
exact (triangle.orthocenter_replace_orthocenter_eq_point
hj₁₂ hj₁₃ hj₂₃ h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ h₁ h₂.symm h₃.symm).symm },
{ rw hs,
convert ht₀s using 2,
exact triangle.orthocenter_eq_of_range_eq hs }
end
end euclidean_geometry
|
e43f456acdc5cd2570f9ec7dd78814c353e2f42a | 495c02489c2d6a1db94dfdba71dd800d3cc67df2 | /group_theory/subgroup.lean | b1ca1c32795e2f6ee596ac11612d0369a7ad181b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leodemoura/leanproved | e0fcbe4f4d72bf0dad9a962ed111b5975cf90712 | de56e0af159dd0c0421733289c76aa79c78a0191 | refs/heads/master | 1,606,822,676,898 | 1,435,711,541,000 | 1,435,711,541,000 | 36,675,856 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,433,178,724,000 | 1,433,178,724,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,812 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Haitao Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author : Haitao Zhang
-/
import data algebra.group data
open function
-- ⁻¹ in eq.ops conflicts with group ⁻¹
-- open eq.ops
local notation H1 ▸ H2 := eq.subst H1 H2
open set
local attribute set [reducible]
section
open finset
-- overloading problem, use set.subset explicitly for now-example (A : Type) (x : A) (S H : set A) (Pin : x ∈ S) (Psub : S ⊆ H) : x ∈ H := Psub Pin
end
namespace algebra
namespace coset
-- semigroup coset definition
section
variable {A : Type}
variable [s : semigroup A]
include s
definition lmul (a : A) := λ x, a * x
definition rmul (a : A) := λ x, x * a
definition l a (S : set A) := (lmul a) '[S]
definition r a (S : set A) := (rmul a) '[S]
lemma lmul_compose : ∀ (a b : A), (lmul a) ∘ (lmul b) = lmul (a*b) :=
take a, take b,
funext (assume x, by
rewrite [↑function.compose, ↑lmul, mul.assoc])
lemma rmul_compose : ∀ (a b : A), (rmul a) ∘ (rmul b) = rmul (b*a) :=
take a, take b,
funext (assume x, by
rewrite [↑function.compose, ↑rmul, mul.assoc])
lemma lcompose a b (S : set A) : l a (l b S) = l (a*b) S :=
calc (lmul a) '[(lmul b) '[S]] = ((lmul a) ∘ (lmul b)) '[S] : image_compose
... = lmul (a*b) '[S] : lmul_compose
lemma rcompose a b (S : set A) : r a (r b S) = r (b*a) S :=
calc (rmul a) '[(rmul b) '[S]] = ((rmul a) ∘ (rmul b)) '[S] : image_compose
... = rmul (b*a) '[S] : rmul_compose
lemma l_sub a (S H : set A) : S ⊆ H → (l a S) ⊆ (l a H) := image_subset (lmul a)
definition l_same S (a b : A) := l a S = l b S
definition r_same S (a b : A) := r a S = r b S
lemma l_same.refl S (a : A) : l_same S a a := rfl
lemma l_same.symm S (a b : A) : l_same S a b → l_same S b a := eq.symm
lemma l_same.trans S (a b c : A) : l_same S a b → l_same S b c → l_same S a c := eq.trans
example (S : set A) : equivalence (l_same S) := mk_equivalence (l_same S) (l_same.refl S) (l_same.symm S) (l_same.trans S)
end
end coset
section
variable {A : Type}
variable [s : group A]
include s
definition lmul_by (a : A) := λ x, a * x
definition rmul_by (a : A) := λ x, x * a
definition glcoset a (H : set A) : set A := λ x, H (a⁻¹ * x)
definition grcoset H (a : A) : set A := λ x, H (x * a⁻¹)
definition conj_by (g a : A) := g * a * g⁻¹
definition is_conjugate (a b : A) := ∃ x, conj_by x b = a
end
end algebra
namespace group
open algebra
namespace ops
infixr `∘>`:55 := glcoset -- stronger than = (50), weaker than * (70)
infixl `<∘`:55 := grcoset
infixr `∘c`:55 := conj_by
end ops
end group
namespace algebra
open group.ops
section
variable {A : Type}
variable [s : group A]
include s
-- too precious to make it wider scope. group.ops can now be openned without it.
local infixl `~` := is_conjugate
lemma conj_compose (f g a : A) : f ∘c g ∘c a = f*g ∘c a :=
calc f ∘c g ∘c a = f * (g * a * g⁻¹) * f⁻¹ : rfl
... = f * (g * a) * g⁻¹ * f⁻¹ : mul.assoc
... = f * g * a * g⁻¹ * f⁻¹ : mul.assoc
... = f * g * a * (g⁻¹ * f⁻¹) : mul.assoc
... = f * g * a * (f * g)⁻¹ : mul_inv
lemma conj_id (a : A) : 1 ∘c a = a :=
calc 1 * a * 1⁻¹ = a * 1⁻¹ : one_mul
... = a * 1 : one_inv
... = a : mul_one
lemma conj_one (g : A) : g ∘c 1 = 1 :=
calc g * 1 * g⁻¹ = g * g⁻¹ : mul_one
... = 1 : mul.right_inv
lemma conj_inv_cancel (g : A) : ∀ a, g⁻¹ ∘c g ∘c a = a :=
assume a, calc
g⁻¹ ∘c g ∘c a = g⁻¹*g ∘c a : conj_compose
... = 1 ∘c a : mul.left_inv
... = a : conj_id
lemma is_conj.refl (a : A) : a ~ a := exists.intro 1 (conj_id a)
lemma is_conj.symm (a b : A) : a ~ b → b ~ a :=
assume Pab, obtain x (Pconj : x ∘c b = a), from Pab,
assert Pxinv : x⁻¹ ∘c x ∘c b = x⁻¹ ∘c a, from (congr_arg2 conj_by (eq.refl x⁻¹) Pconj),
exists.intro x⁻¹ (eq.symm (conj_inv_cancel x b ▸ Pxinv))
lemma is_conj.trans (a b c : A) : a ~ b → b ~ c → a ~ c :=
assume Pab, assume Pbc,
obtain x (Px : x ∘c b = a), from Pab,
obtain y (Py : y ∘c c = b), from Pbc,
exists.intro (x*y) (calc
x*y ∘c c = x ∘c y ∘c c : conj_compose
... = x ∘c b : Py
... = a : Px)
lemma lmul_inj (a : A) : injective (lmul_by a) :=
take x₁ x₂ Peq, by esimp [lmul_by] at Peq;
rewrite [-(inv_mul_cancel_left a x₁), -(inv_mul_cancel_left a x₂), Peq]
lemma lmul_inv_on (a : A) (H : set A) : left_inv_on (lmul_by a⁻¹) (lmul_by a) H :=
take x Px, show a⁻¹*(a*x) = x, by rewrite inv_mul_cancel_left
lemma lmul_inj_on (a : A) (H : set A) : inj_on (lmul_by a) H :=
inj_on_of_left_inv_on (lmul_inv_on a H)
lemma glcoset_eq_lcoset a (H : set A) : a ∘> H = coset.l a H :=
setext
begin
intro x,
rewrite [↑glcoset, ↑coset.l, ↑image, ↑set_of, ↑mem, ↑coset.lmul],
apply iff.intro,
intro P1,
apply (exists.intro (a⁻¹ * x)),
apply and.intro,
exact P1,
exact (mul_inv_cancel_left a x),
show (∃ (x_1 : A), H x_1 ∧ a * x_1 = x) → H (a⁻¹ * x), from
assume P2, obtain x_1 P3, from P2,
have P4 : a * x_1 = x, from and.right P3,
have P5 : x_1 = a⁻¹ * x, from eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq P4,
eq.subst P5 (and.left P3)
end
lemma grcoset_eq_rcoset a (H : set A) : H <∘ a = coset.r a H :=
begin
rewrite [↑grcoset, ↑coset.r, ↑image, ↑coset.rmul, ↑set_of],
apply setext, rewrite ↑mem,
intro x,
apply iff.intro,
show H (x * a⁻¹) → (∃ (x_1 : A), H x_1 ∧ x_1 * a = x), from
assume PH,
exists.intro (x * a⁻¹)
(and.intro PH (inv_mul_cancel_right x a)),
show (∃ (x_1 : A), H x_1 ∧ x_1 * a = x) → H (x * a⁻¹), from
assume Pex,
obtain x_1 Pand, from Pex,
eq.subst (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (and.right Pand)) (and.left Pand)
end
lemma glcoset_sub a (S H : set A) : S ⊆ H → (a ∘> S) ⊆ (a ∘> H) :=
assume Psub,
assert P : _, from coset.l_sub a S H Psub,
eq.symm (glcoset_eq_lcoset a S) ▸ eq.symm (glcoset_eq_lcoset a H) ▸ P
lemma glcoset_compose (a b : A) (H : set A) : a ∘> b ∘> H = a*b ∘> H :=
begin
rewrite [*glcoset_eq_lcoset], exact (coset.lcompose a b H)
end
lemma grcoset_compose (a b : A) (H : set A) : H <∘ a <∘ b = H <∘ a*b :=
begin
rewrite [*grcoset_eq_rcoset], exact (coset.rcompose b a H)
end
lemma glcoset_id (H : set A) : 1 ∘> H = H :=
funext (assume x,
calc (1 ∘> H) x = H (1⁻¹*x) : rfl
... = H (1*x) : {one_inv}
... = H x : {one_mul x})
lemma grcoset_id (H : set A) : H <∘ 1 = H :=
funext (assume x,
calc H (x*1⁻¹) = H (x*1) : {one_inv}
... = H x : {mul_one x})
--lemma glcoset_inv a (H : set A) : a⁻¹ ∘> a ∘> H = H :=
-- funext (assume x,
-- calc glcoset a⁻¹ (glcoset a H) x = H x : {mul_inv_cancel_left a⁻¹ x})
lemma glcoset_inv a (H : set A) : a⁻¹ ∘> a ∘> H = H :=
calc a⁻¹ ∘> a ∘> H = (a⁻¹*a) ∘> H : glcoset_compose
... = 1 ∘> H : mul.left_inv
... = H : glcoset_id
lemma grcoset_inv H (a : A) : (H <∘ a) <∘ a⁻¹ = H :=
funext (assume x,
calc grcoset (grcoset H a) a⁻¹ x = H x : {inv_mul_cancel_right x a⁻¹})
lemma glcoset_cancel a b (H : set A) : (b*a⁻¹) ∘> a ∘> H = b ∘> H :=
calc (b*a⁻¹) ∘> a ∘> H = b*a⁻¹*a ∘> H : glcoset_compose
... = b ∘> H : {inv_mul_cancel_right b a}
lemma grcoset_cancel a b (H : set A) : H <∘ a <∘ a⁻¹*b = H <∘ b :=
calc H <∘ a <∘ a⁻¹*b = H <∘ a*(a⁻¹*b) : grcoset_compose
... = H <∘ b : {mul_inv_cancel_left a b}
-- test how precedence breaks tie: infixr takes hold since its encountered first
example a b (H : set A) : a ∘> H <∘ b = a ∘> (H <∘ b) := rfl
-- should be true for semigroup as well but irrelevant
lemma lcoset_rcoset_assoc a b (H : set A) : a ∘> H <∘ b = (a ∘> H) <∘ b :=
funext (assume x, begin
esimp [glcoset, grcoset], rewrite mul.assoc
end)
definition mul_closed_on H := ∀ (x y : A), x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H
lemma closed_lcontract a (H : set A) : mul_closed_on H → a ∈ H → a ∘> H ⊆ H :=
begin
rewrite [↑mul_closed_on, ↑glcoset, ↑subset, ↑mem],
intro Pclosed, intro PHa, intro x, intro PHainvx,
exact (eq.subst (mul_inv_cancel_left a x)
(Pclosed a (a⁻¹*x) PHa PHainvx))
end
lemma closed_rcontract a (H : set A) : mul_closed_on H → a ∈ H → H <∘ a ⊆ H :=
assume P1 : mul_closed_on H,
assume P2 : H a,
begin
rewrite ↑subset,
intro x,
rewrite [↑grcoset, ↑mem],
intro P3,
exact (eq.subst (inv_mul_cancel_right x a) (P1 (x * a⁻¹) a P3 P2))
end
lemma closed_lcontract_set a (H G : set A) : mul_closed_on G → H ⊆ G → a∈G → a∘>H ⊆ G :=
assume Pclosed, assume PHsubG, assume PainG,
assert PaGsubG : a ∘> G ⊆ G, from closed_lcontract a G Pclosed PainG,
assert PaHsubaG : a ∘> H ⊆ a ∘> G, from
eq.symm (glcoset_eq_lcoset a H) ▸ eq.symm (glcoset_eq_lcoset a G) ▸ (coset.l_sub a H G PHsubG),
subset.trans _ _ _ PaHsubaG PaGsubG
definition subgroup.has_inv H := ∀ (a : A), a ∈ H → a⁻¹ ∈ H
-- two ways to define the same equivalence relatiohship for subgroups
definition in_lcoset [reducible] H (a b : A) := a ∈ b ∘> H
definition in_rcoset [reducible] H (a b : A) := a ∈ H <∘ b
definition same_lcoset [reducible] H (a b : A) := a ∘> H = b ∘> H
definition same_rcoset [reducible] H (a b : A) := H <∘ a = H <∘ b
definition same_left_right_coset (N : set A) := ∀ x, x ∘> N = N <∘ x
structure is_subgroup [class] (H : set A) : Type :=
(has_one : H 1)
(mul_closed : mul_closed_on H)
(has_inv : subgroup.has_inv H)
structure is_normal_subgroup [class] (N : set A) extends is_subgroup N :=
(normal : same_left_right_coset N)
end
section subgroup
variable {A : Type}
variable [s : group A]
include s
variable {H : set A}
variable [is_subg : is_subgroup H]
include is_subg
lemma subg_has_one : H (1 : A) := @is_subgroup.has_one A s H is_subg
lemma subg_mul_closed : mul_closed_on H := @is_subgroup.mul_closed A s H is_subg
lemma subg_has_inv : subgroup.has_inv H := @is_subgroup.has_inv A s H is_subg
lemma subgroup_coset_id : ∀ a, a ∈ H → (a ∘> H = H ∧ H <∘ a = H) :=
take a, assume PHa : H a,
assert Pl : a ∘> H ⊆ H, from closed_lcontract a H subg_mul_closed PHa,
assert Pr : H <∘ a ⊆ H, from closed_rcontract a H subg_mul_closed PHa,
assert PHainv : H a⁻¹, from subg_has_inv a PHa,
and.intro
(setext (assume x,
begin
esimp [glcoset, mem],
apply iff.intro,
apply Pl,
intro PHx, exact (subg_mul_closed a⁻¹ x PHainv PHx)
end))
(setext (assume x,
begin
esimp [grcoset, mem],
apply iff.intro,
apply Pr,
intro PHx, exact (subg_mul_closed x a⁻¹ PHx PHainv)
end))
lemma subgroup_lcoset_id : ∀ a, a ∈ H → a ∘> H = H :=
take a, assume PHa : H a,
and.left (subgroup_coset_id a PHa)
lemma subgroup_rcoset_id : ∀ a, a ∈ H → H <∘ a = H :=
take a, assume PHa : H a,
and.right (subgroup_coset_id a PHa)
lemma subg_in_coset_refl (a : A) : a ∈ a ∘> H ∧ a ∈ H <∘ a :=
assert PH1 : H 1, from subg_has_one,
assert PHinvaa : H (a⁻¹*a), from (eq.symm (mul.left_inv a)) ▸ PH1,
assert PHainva : H (a*a⁻¹), from (eq.symm (mul.right_inv a)) ▸ PH1,
and.intro PHinvaa PHainva
lemma subg_in_lcoset_same_lcoset (a b : A) : in_lcoset H a b → same_lcoset H a b :=
assume Pa_in_b : H (b⁻¹*a),
have Pbinva : b⁻¹*a ∘> H = H, from subgroup_lcoset_id (b⁻¹*a) Pa_in_b,
have Pb_binva : b ∘> b⁻¹*a ∘> H = b ∘> H, from Pbinva ▸ rfl,
have Pbbinva : b*(b⁻¹*a)∘>H = b∘>H, from glcoset_compose b (b⁻¹*a) H ▸ Pb_binva,
mul_inv_cancel_left b a ▸ Pbbinva
lemma subg_same_lcoset_in_lcoset (a b : A) : same_lcoset H a b → in_lcoset H a b :=
assume Psame : a∘>H = b∘>H,
assert Pa : a ∈ a∘>H, from and.left (subg_in_coset_refl a),
by exact (Psame ▸ Pa)
lemma subg_lcoset_same (a b : A) : in_lcoset H a b = (a∘>H = b∘>H) :=
propext(iff.intro (subg_in_lcoset_same_lcoset a b) (subg_same_lcoset_in_lcoset a b))
lemma subg_rcoset_same (a b : A) : in_rcoset H a b = (H<∘a = H<∘b) :=
propext(iff.intro
(assume Pa_in_b : H (a*b⁻¹),
have Pabinv : H<∘a*b⁻¹ = H, from subgroup_rcoset_id (a*b⁻¹) Pa_in_b,
have Pabinv_b : H <∘ a*b⁻¹ <∘ b = H <∘ b, from Pabinv ▸ rfl,
have Pabinvb : H <∘ a*b⁻¹*b = H <∘ b, from grcoset_compose (a*b⁻¹) b H ▸ Pabinv_b,
inv_mul_cancel_right a b ▸ Pabinvb)
(assume Psame,
assert Pa : a ∈ H<∘a, from and.right (subg_in_coset_refl a),
by exact (Psame ▸ Pa)))
lemma subg_same_lcoset.refl (a : A) : same_lcoset H a a := rfl
lemma subg_same_rcoset.refl (a : A) : same_rcoset H a a := rfl
lemma subg_same_lcoset.symm (a b : A) : same_lcoset H a b → same_lcoset H b a := eq.symm
lemma subg_same_rcoset.symm (a b : A) : same_rcoset H a b → same_rcoset H b a := eq.symm
lemma subg_same_lcoset.trans (a b c : A) : same_lcoset H a b → same_lcoset H b c → same_lcoset H a c :=
eq.trans
lemma subg_same_rcoset.trans (a b c : A) : same_rcoset H a b → same_rcoset H b c → same_rcoset H a c :=
eq.trans
variable {S : set A}
lemma subg_lcoset_subset_subg (Psub : S ⊆ H) (a : A) : a ∈ H → a ∘> S ⊆ H :=
assume Pin, have P : a ∘> S ⊆ a ∘> H, from glcoset_sub a S H Psub,
subgroup_lcoset_id a Pin ▸ P
end subgroup
section normal_subg
open quot
variable {A : Type}
variable [s : group A]
include s
variable (N : set A)
variable [is_nsubg : is_normal_subgroup N]
include is_nsubg
local notation a `~` b := same_lcoset N a b -- note : does not bind as strong as →
lemma nsubg_normal : same_left_right_coset N := @is_normal_subgroup.normal A s N is_nsubg
lemma nsubg_same_lcoset_product : ∀ a1 a2 b1 b2, (a1 ~ b1) → (a2 ~ b2) → ((a1*a2) ~ (b1*b2)) :=
take a1, take a2, take b1, take b2,
assume Psame1 : a1 ∘> N = b1 ∘> N,
assume Psame2 : a2 ∘> N = b2 ∘> N,
calc
a1*a2 ∘> N = a1 ∘> a2 ∘> N : glcoset_compose
... = a1 ∘> b2 ∘> N : by rewrite Psame2
... = a1 ∘> (N <∘ b2) : by rewrite (nsubg_normal N)
... = (a1 ∘> N) <∘ b2 : by rewrite lcoset_rcoset_assoc
... = (b1 ∘> N) <∘ b2 : by rewrite Psame1
... = N <∘ b1 <∘ b2 : by rewrite (nsubg_normal N)
... = N <∘ (b1*b2) : by rewrite grcoset_compose
... = (b1*b2) ∘> N : by rewrite (nsubg_normal N)
example (a b : A) : (a⁻¹ ~ b⁻¹) = (a⁻¹ ∘> N = b⁻¹ ∘> N) := rfl
lemma nsubg_same_lcoset_inv : ∀ a b, (a ~ b) → (a⁻¹ ~ b⁻¹) :=
take a b, assume Psame : a ∘> N = b ∘> N, calc
a⁻¹ ∘> N = a⁻¹*b*b⁻¹ ∘> N : by rewrite mul_inv_cancel_right
... = a⁻¹*b ∘> b⁻¹ ∘> N : by rewrite glcoset_compose
... = a⁻¹*b ∘> (N <∘ b⁻¹) : by rewrite nsubg_normal
... = (a⁻¹*b ∘> N) <∘ b⁻¹ : by rewrite lcoset_rcoset_assoc
... = (a⁻¹ ∘> b ∘> N) <∘ b⁻¹ : by rewrite glcoset_compose
... = (a⁻¹ ∘> a ∘> N) <∘ b⁻¹ : by rewrite Psame
... = N <∘ b⁻¹ : by rewrite glcoset_inv
... = b⁻¹ ∘> N : by rewrite nsubg_normal
definition nsubg_setoid [instance] : setoid A :=
setoid.mk (same_lcoset N)
(mk_equivalence (same_lcoset N) (subg_same_lcoset.refl) (subg_same_lcoset.symm) (subg_same_lcoset.trans))
definition coset_of : Type := quot (nsubg_setoid N)
definition coset_inv_base (a : A) : coset_of N := ⟦a⁻¹⟧
definition coset_product (a b : A) : coset_of N := ⟦a*b⟧
lemma coset_product_well_defined : ∀ a1 a2 b1 b2, (a1 ~ b1) → (a2 ~ b2) → ⟦a1*a2⟧ = ⟦b1*b2⟧ :=
take a1 a2 b1 b2, assume P1 P2,
quot.sound (nsubg_same_lcoset_product N a1 a2 b1 b2 P1 P2)
definition coset_mul (aN bN : coset_of N) : coset_of N :=
quot.lift_on₂ aN bN (coset_product N) (coset_product_well_defined N)
lemma coset_inv_well_defined : ∀ a b, (a ~ b) → ⟦a⁻¹⟧ = ⟦b⁻¹⟧ :=
take a b, assume P, quot.sound (nsubg_same_lcoset_inv N a b P)
definition coset_inv (aN : coset_of N) : coset_of N :=
quot.lift_on aN (coset_inv_base N) (coset_inv_well_defined N)
definition coset_one : coset_of N := ⟦1⟧
local infixl `cx`:70 := coset_mul N
example (a b c : A) : ⟦a⟧ cx ⟦b*c⟧ = ⟦a*(b*c)⟧ := rfl
lemma coset_product_assoc (a b c : A) : ⟦a⟧ cx ⟦b⟧ cx ⟦c⟧ = ⟦a⟧ cx (⟦b⟧ cx ⟦c⟧) := calc
⟦a*b*c⟧ = ⟦a*(b*c)⟧ : {mul.assoc a b c}
... = ⟦a⟧ cx ⟦b*c⟧ : rfl
lemma coset_product_left_id (a : A) : ⟦1⟧ cx ⟦a⟧ = ⟦a⟧ := calc
⟦1*a⟧ = ⟦a⟧ : {one_mul a}
lemma coset_product_right_id (a : A) : ⟦a⟧ cx ⟦1⟧ = ⟦a⟧ := calc
⟦a*1⟧ = ⟦a⟧ : {mul_one a}
lemma coset_product_left_inv (a : A) : ⟦a⁻¹⟧ cx ⟦a⟧ = ⟦1⟧ := calc
⟦a⁻¹*a⟧ = ⟦1⟧ : {mul.left_inv a}
lemma coset_mul.assoc (aN bN cN : coset_of N) : aN cx bN cx cN = aN cx (bN cx cN) :=
quot.ind (λ a, quot.ind (λ b, quot.ind (λ c, coset_product_assoc N a b c) cN) bN) aN
lemma coset_mul.one_mul (aN : coset_of N) : coset_one N cx aN = aN :=
quot.ind (coset_product_left_id N) aN
lemma coset_mul.mul_one (aN : coset_of N) : aN cx (coset_one N) = aN :=
quot.ind (coset_product_right_id N) aN
lemma coset_mul.left_inv (aN : coset_of N) : (coset_inv N aN) cx aN = (coset_one N) :=
quot.ind (coset_product_left_inv N) aN
definition mk_quotient_group : group (coset_of N):=
group.mk (coset_mul N) (coset_mul.assoc N) (coset_one N) (coset_mul.one_mul N) (coset_mul.mul_one N) (coset_inv N) (coset_mul.left_inv N)
end normal_subg
namespace group
namespace quotient
section
open quot
variable {A : Type}
variable [s : group A]
include s
variable {N : set A}
variable [is_nsubg : is_normal_subgroup N]
include is_nsubg
definition quotient_group [instance] : group (coset_of N) := mk_quotient_group N
example (aN : coset_of N) : aN * aN⁻¹ = 1 := mul.right_inv aN
definition natural (a : A) : coset_of N := ⟦a⟧
end
end quotient
end group
end algebra
|
8bdd618cabd7cb69a5a83c807fafd0048f396524 | e00ea76a720126cf9f6d732ad6216b5b824d20a7 | /src/geometry/manifold/manifold.lean | c8f5500bf58ccf74096fd496ae83c3ba82b09f81 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | vaibhavkarve/mathlib | a574aaf68c0a431a47fa82ce0637f0f769826bfe | 17f8340912468f49bdc30acdb9a9fa02eeb0473a | refs/heads/master | 1,621,263,802,637 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 250,833,447 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,410,341,000 | 1,585,410,341,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,457 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.local_homeomorph
/-!
# Manifolds
A manifold is a topological space M locally modelled on a model space H, i.e., the manifold is
covered by open subsets on which there are local homeomorphisms (the charts) going to H. If the
changes of charts satisfy some additional property (for instance if they are smooth), then M
inherits additional structure (it makes sense to talk about smooth manifolds). There are therefore
two different ingredients in a manifold:
* the set of charts, which is data
* the fact that changes of charts belong to some group (in fact groupoid), which is additional Prop.
We separate these two parts in the definition: the manifold structure is just the set of charts, and
then the different smoothness requirements (smooth manifold, orientable manifold, contact manifold,
and so on) are additional properties of these charts. These properties are formalized through the
notion of structure groupoid, i.e., a set of local homeomorphisms stable under composition and
inverse, to which the change of coordinates should belong.
## Main definitions
* `structure_groupoid H` : a subset of local homeomorphisms of `H` stable under composition, inverse
and restriction (ex: local diffeos)
* `pregroupoid H` : a subset of local homeomorphisms of `H` stable under composition and
restriction, but not inverse (ex: smooth maps)
* `groupoid_of_pregroupoid`: construct a groupoid from a pregroupoid, by requiring that a map and its
inverse both belong to the pregroupoid (ex: construct diffeos from smooth
maps)
* `continuous_groupoid H` : the groupoid of all local homeomorphisms of `H`
* `manifold H M` : manifold structure on `M` modelled on `H`, given by an atlas of local
homeomorphisms from `M` to `H` whose sources cover `M`. This is a type class.
* `has_groupoid M G` : when `G` is a structure groupoid on `H` and `M` is a manifold modelled on
`H`, require that all coordinate changes belong to `G`. This is a type
class
* `atlas H M` : when `M` is a manifold modelled on `H`, the atlas of this manifold
structure, i.e., the set of charts
* `structomorph G M M'` : the set of diffeomorphisms between the manifolds `M` and `M'` for the
groupoid `G`. We avoid the word diffeomorphisms, keeping it for the
smooth category.
As a basic example, we give the instance
`instance manifold_model_space (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : manifold H H`
saying that a topological space is a manifold over itself, with the identity as unique chart. This
manifold structure is compatible with any groupoid.
## Implementation notes
The atlas in a manifold is *not* a maximal atlas in general: the notion of maximality depends on the
groupoid one considers, and changing groupoids changes the maximal atlas. With the current
formalization, it makes sense first to choose the atlas, and then to ask whether this precise atlas
defines a smooth manifold, an orientable manifold, and so on. A consequence is that structomorphisms
between M and M' do *not* induce a bijection between the atlases of M and M': the definition is only
that, read in charts, the structomorphism locally belongs to the groupoid under consideration.
(This is equivalent to inducing a bijection between elements of the maximal atlas). A consequence
is that the invariance under structomorphisms of properties defined in terms of the atlas is not
obvious in general, and could require some work in theory (amounting to the fact that these
properties only depend on the maximal atlas, for instance). In practice, this does not create any
real difficulty.
We use the letter `H` for the model space thinking of the case of manifolds with boundary, where the
model space is a half space.
Manifolds are sometimes defined as topological spaces with an atlas of local diffeomorphisms, and
sometimes as spaces with an atlas from which a topology is deduced. We use the former approach:
otherwise, there would be an instance from manifolds to topological spaces, which means that any
instance search for topological spaces would try to find manifold structures involving a yet
unknown model space, leading to problems. However, we also introduce the latter approach,
through a structure `manifold_core` making it possible to construct a topology out of a set of local
equivs with compatibility conditions (but we do not register it as an instance).
In the definition of a manifold, the model space is written as an explicit parameter as there can be
several model spaces for a given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold (modelled over
ℂ^n) will also be seen sometimes as a real manifold modelled over ℝ^(2n).
-/
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.decidable_inhabited classical.prop_decidable
universes u
variables {H : Type u} {M : Type*} {M' : Type*} {M'' : Type*}
/- Notational shortcut for the composition of local homeomorphisms, i.e., `local_homeomorph.trans`.
Note that, as is usual for equivs, the composition is from left to right, hence the direction of
the arrow. -/
local infixr ` ≫ₕ `:100 := local_homeomorph.trans
open set local_homeomorph
section groupoid
/- One could add to the definition of a structure groupoid the fact that the restriction of an
element of the groupoid to any open set still belongs to the groupoid.
(This is in Kobayashi-Nomizu.)
I am not sure I want this, for instance on H × E where E is a vector space, and the groupoid is made
of functions respecting the fibers and linear in the fibers (so that a manifold over this groupoid
is naturally a vector bundle) I prefer that the members of the groupoid are always defined on
sets of the form s × E
The only nontrivial requirement is locality: if a local homeomorphism belongs to the groupoid
around each point in its domain of definition, then it belongs to the groupoid. Without this
requirement, the composition of diffeomorphisms does not have to be a diffeomorphism. Note that
this implies that a local homeomorphism with empty source belongs to any structure groupoid, as
it trivially satisfies this condition.
There is also a technical point, related to the fact that a local homeomorphism is by definition a
global map which is a homeomorphism when restricted to its source subset (and its values outside
of the source are not relevant). Therefore, we also require that being a member of the groupoid only
depends on the values on the source.
-/
/-- A structure groupoid is a set of local homeomorphisms of a topological space stable under
composition and inverse. They appear in the definition of the smoothness class of a manifold. -/
structure structure_groupoid (H : Type u) [topological_space H] :=
(members : set (local_homeomorph H H))
(comp : ∀e e' : local_homeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ∈ members → e ≫ₕ e' ∈ members)
(inv : ∀e : local_homeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e.symm ∈ members)
(id_mem : local_homeomorph.refl H ∈ members)
(locality : ∀e : local_homeomorph H H, (∀x ∈ e.source, ∃s, is_open s ∧
x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ members) → e ∈ members)
(eq_on_source : ∀ e e' : local_homeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ≈ e → e' ∈ members)
variable [topological_space H]
@[reducible] instance : has_mem (local_homeomorph H H) (structure_groupoid H) :=
⟨λ(e : local_homeomorph H H) (G : structure_groupoid H), e ∈ G.members⟩
/-- Partial order on the set of groupoids, given by inclusion of the members of the groupoid -/
instance structure_groupoid.partial_order : partial_order (structure_groupoid H) :=
partial_order.lift structure_groupoid.members
(λa b h, by { cases a, cases b, dsimp at h, induction h, refl }) (by apply_instance)
/-- The trivial groupoid, containing only the identity (and maps with empty source, as this is
necessary from the definition) -/
def id_groupoid (H : Type u) [topological_space H] : structure_groupoid H :=
{ members := {local_homeomorph.refl H} ∪ {e : local_homeomorph H H | e.source = ∅},
comp := λe e' he he', begin
cases he; simp at he he',
{ simpa [he] },
{ have : (e ≫ₕ e').source ⊆ e.source := sep_subset _ _,
rw he at this,
have : (e ≫ₕ e') ∈ {e : local_homeomorph H H | e.source = ∅} := disjoint_iff.1 this,
exact (mem_union _ _ _).2 (or.inr this) },
end,
inv := λe he, begin
cases (mem_union _ _ _).1 he with E E,
{ finish },
{ right,
simpa [e.to_local_equiv.image_source_eq_target.symm] using E },
end,
id_mem := mem_union_left _ (mem_insert _ ∅),
locality := λe he, begin
cases e.source.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ right, exact h },
{ left,
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
rcases he x hx with ⟨s, open_s, xs, hs⟩,
have x's : x ∈ (e.restr s).source,
{ rw [restr_source, interior_eq_of_open open_s],
exact ⟨hx, xs⟩ },
cases hs,
{ replace hs : local_homeomorph.restr e s = local_homeomorph.refl H,
by simpa using hs,
have : (e.restr s).source = univ, by { rw hs, simp },
change (e.to_local_equiv).source ∩ interior s = univ at this,
have : univ ⊆ interior s, by { rw ← this, exact inter_subset_right _ _ },
have : s = univ, by rwa [interior_eq_of_open open_s, univ_subset_iff] at this,
simpa [this, restr_univ] using hs },
{ exfalso,
rw mem_set_of_eq at hs,
rwa hs at x's } },
end,
eq_on_source := λe e' he he'e, begin
cases he,
{ left,
have : e = e',
{ refine eq_of_eq_on_source_univ (setoid.symm he'e) _ _;
rw set.mem_singleton_iff.1 he ; refl },
rwa ← this },
{ right,
change (e.to_local_equiv).source = ∅ at he,
rwa [set.mem_set_of_eq, source_eq_of_eq_on_source he'e] }
end }
/-- Every structure groupoid contains the identity groupoid -/
instance : order_bot (structure_groupoid H) :=
{ bot := id_groupoid H,
bot_le := begin
assume u f hf,
change f ∈ {local_homeomorph.refl H} ∪ {e : local_homeomorph H H | e.source = ∅} at hf,
simp only [singleton_union, mem_set_of_eq, mem_insert_iff] at hf,
cases hf,
{ rw hf,
apply u.id_mem },
{ apply u.locality,
assume x hx,
rw [hf, mem_empty_eq] at hx,
exact hx.elim }
end,
..structure_groupoid.partial_order }
/-- To construct a groupoid, one may consider classes of local homeos such that both the function
and its inverse have some property. If this property is stable under composition,
one gets a groupoid. `pregroupoid` bundles the properties needed for this construction, with the
groupoid of smooth functions with smooth inverses as an application. -/
structure pregroupoid (H : Type*) [topological_space H] :=
(property : (H → H) → (set H) → Prop)
(comp : ∀{f g u v}, property f u → property g v → is_open (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
→ property (g ∘ f) (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v))
(id_mem : property id univ)
(locality : ∀{f u}, is_open u → (∀x∈u, ∃v, is_open v ∧ x ∈ v ∧ property f (u ∩ v)) → property f u)
(congr : ∀{f g : H → H} {u}, is_open u → (∀x∈u, g x = f x) → property f u → property g u)
/-- Construct a groupoid of local homeos for which the map and its inverse have some property,
from a pregroupoid asserting that this property is stable under composition. -/
def pregroupoid.groupoid (PG : pregroupoid H) : structure_groupoid H :=
{ members := {e : local_homeomorph H H | PG.property e.to_fun e.source ∧ PG.property e.inv_fun e.target},
comp := λe e' he he', begin
split,
{ apply PG.comp he.1 he'.1,
apply e.continuous_to_fun.preimage_open_of_open e.open_source e'.open_source },
{ apply PG.comp he'.2 he.2,
apply e'.continuous_inv_fun.preimage_open_of_open e'.open_target e.open_target }
end,
inv := λe he, ⟨he.2, he.1⟩,
id_mem := ⟨PG.id_mem, PG.id_mem⟩,
locality := λe he, begin
split,
{ apply PG.locality e.open_source (λx xu, _),
rcases he x xu with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩,
refine ⟨s, s_open, xs, _⟩,
convert hs.1,
exact (interior_eq_of_open s_open).symm },
{ apply PG.locality e.open_target (λx xu, _),
rcases he (e.inv_fun x) (e.map_target xu) with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩,
refine ⟨e.target ∩ e.inv_fun ⁻¹' s, _, ⟨xu, xs⟩, _⟩,
{ exact continuous_on.preimage_open_of_open e.continuous_inv_fun e.open_target s_open },
{ rw [← inter_assoc, inter_self],
convert hs.2,
exact (interior_eq_of_open s_open).symm } },
end,
eq_on_source := λe e' he ee', begin
split,
{ apply PG.congr e'.open_source ee'.2,
simp only [ee'.1, he.1] },
{ have A := eq_on_source_symm ee',
apply PG.congr e'.symm.open_source A.2,
convert he.2,
rw A.1,
refl }
end }
lemma mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid (PG : pregroupoid H) (e : local_homeomorph H H) :
e ∈ PG.groupoid ↔ PG.property e.to_fun e.source ∧ PG.property e.inv_fun e.target :=
iff.rfl
lemma groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le (PG₁ PG₂ : pregroupoid H)
(h : ∀f s, PG₁.property f s → PG₂.property f s) :
PG₁.groupoid ≤ PG₂.groupoid :=
begin
assume e he,
rw mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid at he ⊢,
exact ⟨h _ _ he.1, h _ _ he.2⟩
end
lemma mem_pregroupoid_of_eq_on_source (PG : pregroupoid H) {e e' : local_homeomorph H H}
(he' : e ≈ e') (he : PG.property e.to_fun e.source) :
PG.property e'.to_fun e'.source :=
begin
rw ← he'.1,
exact PG.congr e.open_source (λx hx, (he'.2 x hx).symm) he,
end
/-- The groupoid of all local homeomorphisms on a topological space H -/
def continuous_groupoid (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : structure_groupoid H :=
pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := λf s, true,
comp := λf g u v hf hg huv, trivial,
id_mem := trivial,
locality := λf u u_open h, trivial,
congr := λf g u u_open hcongr hf, trivial }
/-- Every structure groupoid is contained in the groupoid of all local homeomorphisms -/
instance : order_top (structure_groupoid H) :=
{ top := continuous_groupoid H,
le_top := λ u f hf, by { split; exact dec_trivial },
..structure_groupoid.partial_order }
end groupoid
/-- A manifold is a topological space endowed with an atlas, i.e., a set of local homeomorphisms
taking value in a model space H, called charts, such that the domains of the charts cover the whole
space. We express the covering property by chosing for each x a member `chart_at x` of the atlas
containing x in its source: in the smooth case, this is convenient to construct the tangent bundle
in an efficient way.
The model space is written as an explicit parameter as there can be several model spaces for a
given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold (modelled over ℂ^n) will also be seen
sometimes as a real manifold over ℝ^(2n).
-/
class manifold (H : Type*) [topological_space H] (M : Type*) [topological_space M] :=
(atlas : set (local_homeomorph M H))
(chart_at : M → local_homeomorph M H)
(mem_chart_source : ∀x, x ∈ (chart_at x).source)
(chart_mem_atlas : ∀x, chart_at x ∈ atlas)
export manifold
attribute [simp] mem_chart_source chart_mem_atlas
section manifold
/-- Any space is a manifold modelled over itself, by just using the identity chart -/
instance manifold_model_space (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : manifold H H :=
{ atlas := {local_homeomorph.refl H},
chart_at := λx, local_homeomorph.refl H,
mem_chart_source := λx, mem_univ x,
chart_mem_atlas := λx, mem_singleton _ }
/-- In the trivial manifold structure of a space modelled over itself through the identity, the
atlas members are just the identity -/
@[simp] lemma model_space_atlas {H : Type*} [topological_space H] {e : local_homeomorph H H} :
e ∈ atlas H H ↔ e = local_homeomorph.refl H :=
by simp [atlas, manifold.atlas]
/-- In the model space, chart_at is always the identity -/
@[simp] lemma chart_at_model_space_eq {H : Type*} [topological_space H] {x : H} :
chart_at H x = local_homeomorph.refl H :=
by simpa using chart_mem_atlas H x
end manifold
/-- Sometimes, one may want to construct a manifold structure on a space which does not yet have
a topological structure, where the topology would come from the charts. For this, one needs charts
that are only local equivs, and continuity properties for their composition.
This is formalised in `manifold_core`. -/
structure manifold_core (H : Type*) [topological_space H] (M : Type*) :=
(atlas : set (local_equiv M H))
(chart_at : M → local_equiv M H)
(mem_chart_source : ∀x, x ∈ (chart_at x).source)
(chart_mem_atlas : ∀x, chart_at x ∈ atlas)
(open_source : ∀e e' : local_equiv M H, e ∈ atlas → e' ∈ atlas → is_open (e.symm.trans e').source)
(continuous_to_fun : ∀e e' : local_equiv M H, e ∈ atlas → e' ∈ atlas →
continuous_on (e.symm.trans e').to_fun (e.symm.trans e').source)
namespace manifold_core
variables [topological_space H] (c : manifold_core H M) {e : local_equiv M H}
/-- Topology generated by a set of charts on a Type. -/
protected def to_topological_space : topological_space M :=
topological_space.generate_from $ ⋃ (e : local_equiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas)
(s : set H) (s_open : is_open s), {e.to_fun ⁻¹' s ∩ e.source}
lemma open_source' (he : e ∈ c.atlas) : @is_open M c.to_topological_space e.source :=
begin
apply topological_space.generate_open.basic,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
refine ⟨e, he, univ, is_open_univ, _⟩,
simp only [set.univ_inter, set.preimage_univ]
end
lemma open_target (he : e ∈ c.atlas) : is_open e.target :=
begin
have E : e.target ∩ e.inv_fun ⁻¹' e.source = e.target :=
subset.antisymm (inter_subset_left _ _) (λx hx, ⟨hx,
local_equiv.target_subset_preimage_source _ hx⟩),
simpa [local_equiv.trans_source, E] using c.open_source e e he he
end
def local_homeomorph (e : local_equiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas) :
@local_homeomorph M H c.to_topological_space _ :=
{ open_source := by convert c.open_source' he,
open_target := by convert c.open_target he,
continuous_to_fun := begin
letI : topological_space M := c.to_topological_space,
rw continuous_on_open_iff (c.open_source' he),
assume s s_open,
rw inter_comm,
apply topological_space.generate_open.basic,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
exact ⟨e, he, ⟨s, s_open, rfl⟩⟩
end,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
letI : topological_space M := c.to_topological_space,
apply continuous_on_open_of_generate_from (c.open_target he),
assume t ht,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff] at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨e', e'_atlas, s, s_open, ts⟩,
rw ts,
let f := e.symm.trans e',
have : is_open (f.to_fun ⁻¹' s ∩ f.source),
by simpa [inter_comm] using (continuous_on_open_iff (c.open_source e e' he e'_atlas)).1
(c.continuous_to_fun e e' he e'_atlas) s s_open,
have A : e'.to_fun ∘ e.inv_fun ⁻¹' s ∩ (e.target ∩ e.inv_fun ⁻¹' e'.source) =
e.target ∩ (e'.to_fun ∘ e.inv_fun ⁻¹' s ∩ e.inv_fun ⁻¹' e'.source),
by { rw [← inter_assoc, ← inter_assoc], congr' 1, exact inter_comm _ _ },
simpa [local_equiv.trans_source, preimage_inter, preimage_comp.symm, A] using this
end,
..e }
def to_manifold : @manifold H _ M c.to_topological_space :=
{ atlas := ⋃ (e : local_equiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas), {c.local_homeomorph e he},
chart_at := λx, c.local_homeomorph (c.chart_at x) (c.chart_mem_atlas x),
mem_chart_source := λx, c.mem_chart_source x,
chart_mem_atlas := λx, begin
simp only [mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
exact ⟨c.chart_at x, c.chart_mem_atlas x, rfl⟩,
end }
end manifold_core
section has_groupoid
variables [topological_space H] [topological_space M] [manifold H M]
/-- A manifold has an atlas in a groupoid G if the change of coordinates belong to the groupoid -/
class has_groupoid {H : Type*} [topological_space H] (M : Type*) [topological_space M]
[manifold H M] (G : structure_groupoid H) : Prop :=
(compatible : ∀{e e' : local_homeomorph M H}, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M → e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G)
lemma has_groupoid_of_le {G₁ G₂ : structure_groupoid H} (h : has_groupoid M G₁) (hle : G₁ ≤ G₂) :
has_groupoid M G₂ :=
⟨ λ e e' he he', hle ((h.compatible : _) he he') ⟩
lemma has_groupoid_of_pregroupoid (PG : pregroupoid H)
(h : ∀{e e' : local_homeomorph M H}, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M
→ PG.property (e.symm ≫ₕ e').to_fun (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source) :
has_groupoid M (PG.groupoid) :=
⟨assume e e' he he', (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid PG _).mpr ⟨h he he', h he' he⟩⟩
/-- The trivial manifold structure on the model space is compatible with any groupoid -/
instance has_groupoid_model_space (H : Type*) [topological_space H] (G : structure_groupoid H) :
has_groupoid H G :=
{ compatible := λe e' he he', begin
replace he : e ∈ atlas H H := he,
replace he' : e' ∈ atlas H H := he',
rw model_space_atlas at he he',
simp [he, he', structure_groupoid.id_mem]
end }
/-- Any manifold structure is compatible with the groupoid of all local homeomorphisms -/
instance has_groupoid_continuous_groupoid : has_groupoid M (continuous_groupoid H) :=
⟨begin
assume e e' he he',
rw [continuous_groupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid],
simp only [and_self]
end⟩
/-- A G-diffeomorphism between two manifolds is a homeomorphism which, when read in the charts,
belongs to G. We avoid the word diffeomorph as it is too related to the smooth category, and use
structomorph instead. -/
structure structomorph (G : structure_groupoid H) (M : Type*) (M' : Type*)
[topological_space M] [topological_space M'] [manifold H M] [manifold H M']
extends homeomorph M M' :=
(to_fun_mem_groupoid : ∀c : local_homeomorph M H, ∀c' : local_homeomorph M' H,
c ∈ atlas H M → c' ∈ atlas H M' → c.symm ≫ₕ to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph ≫ₕ c' ∈ G)
variables [topological_space M'] [topological_space M'']
{G : structure_groupoid H} [manifold H M'] [manifold H M'']
/-- The identity is a diffeomorphism of any manifold, for any groupoid. -/
def structomorph.refl (M : Type*) [topological_space M] [manifold H M]
[has_groupoid M G] : structomorph G M M :=
{ to_fun_mem_groupoid := λc c' hc hc', begin
change (local_homeomorph.symm c) ≫ₕ (local_homeomorph.refl M) ≫ₕ c' ∈ G,
rw local_homeomorph.refl_trans,
exact has_groupoid.compatible G hc hc'
end,
..homeomorph.refl M }
/-- The inverse of a structomorphism is a structomorphism -/
def structomorph.symm (e : structomorph G M M') : structomorph G M' M :=
{ to_fun_mem_groupoid := begin
assume c c' hc hc',
have : (c'.symm ≫ₕ e.to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph ≫ₕ c).symm ∈ G :=
G.inv _ (e.to_fun_mem_groupoid c' c hc' hc),
simp at this,
rwa [trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm, trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm, symm_symm, trans_assoc]
at this,
end,
..e.to_homeomorph.symm}
/-- The composition of structomorphisms is a structomorphism -/
def structomorph.trans (e : structomorph G M M') (e' : structomorph G M' M'') : structomorph G M M'' :=
{ to_fun_mem_groupoid := begin
/- Let c and c' be two charts in M and M''. We want to show that e' ∘ e is smooth in these
charts, around any point x. For this, let y = e (c⁻¹ x), and consider a chart g around y.
Then g ∘ e ∘ c⁻¹ and c' ∘ e' ∘ g⁻¹ are both smooth as e and e' are structomorphisms, so
their composition is smooth, and it coincides with c' ∘ e' ∘ e ∘ c⁻¹ around x. -/
assume c c' hc hc',
refine G.locality _ (λx hx, _),
let f₁ := e.to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph,
let f₂ := e'.to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph,
let f := (e.to_homeomorph.trans e'.to_homeomorph).to_local_homeomorph,
have feq : f = f₁ ≫ₕ f₂ := homeomorph.trans_to_local_homeomorph _ _,
-- define the atlas g around y
let y := (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).to_fun x,
let g := chart_at H y,
have hg₁ := chart_mem_atlas H y,
have hg₂ := mem_chart_source H y,
let s := (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).source ∩ (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).to_fun ⁻¹' g.source,
have open_s : is_open s,
by apply (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).continuous_to_fun.preimage_open_of_open; apply open_source,
have : x ∈ s,
{ split,
{ simp only [trans_source, preimage_univ, inter_univ, homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph_source],
rw trans_source at hx,
exact hx.1 },
{ exact hg₂ } },
refine ⟨s, open_s, ⟨this, _⟩⟩,
let F₁ := (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁ ≫ₕ g) ≫ₕ (g.symm ≫ₕ f₂ ≫ₕ c'),
have A : F₁ ∈ G :=
G.comp _ _ (e.to_fun_mem_groupoid c g hc hg₁) (e'.to_fun_mem_groupoid g c' hg₁ hc'),
let F₂ := (c.symm ≫ₕ f ≫ₕ c').restr s,
have : F₁ ≈ F₂ := calc
F₁ ≈ c.symm ≫ₕ f₁ ≫ₕ (g ≫ₕ g.symm) ≫ₕ f₂ ≫ₕ c' : by simp [F₁, trans_assoc]
... ≈ c.symm ≫ₕ f₁ ≫ₕ (of_set g.source g.open_source) ≫ₕ f₂ ≫ₕ c' :
by simp [eq_on_source_trans, trans_self_symm g]
... ≈ ((c.symm ≫ₕ f₁) ≫ₕ (of_set g.source g.open_source)) ≫ₕ (f₂ ≫ₕ c') :
by simp [trans_assoc]
... ≈ ((c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).restr s) ≫ₕ (f₂ ≫ₕ c') : by simp [s, trans_of_set']
... ≈ ((c.symm ≫ₕ f₁) ≫ₕ (f₂ ≫ₕ c')).restr s : by simp [restr_trans]
... ≈ (c.symm ≫ₕ (f₁ ≫ₕ f₂) ≫ₕ c').restr s : by simp [eq_on_source_restr, trans_assoc]
... ≈ F₂ : by simp [F₂, feq],
have : F₂ ∈ G := G.eq_on_source F₁ F₂ A (setoid.symm this),
exact this
end,
..homeomorph.trans e.to_homeomorph e'.to_homeomorph }
end has_groupoid
|
7af9e3ddf9a4a4bc87bae3d2b3127dce002eadf5 | 54d7e71c3616d331b2ec3845d31deb08f3ff1dea | /tests/lean/run/1331.lean | 31fdcb5e79a853e07f0734894917e455a97d1d9a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pachugupta/lean | 6f3305c4292288311cc4ab4550060b17d49ffb1d | 0d02136a09ac4cf27b5c88361750e38e1f485a1a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,110,653,606 | 1,493,130,117,000 | 1,493,167,649,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 369 | lean | def is_space : char → Prop
| #" " := true
| #"\x09" := true -- \t
| #"\n" := true
| #"\x0d" := true -- \r
| _ := false
instance is_space.decidable_pred : decidable_pred is_space :=
begin delta is_space, apply_instance end
def f (a : nat) : nat :=
a + 2
open tactic
lemma flemma : f 0 = 2 :=
begin
delta f,
guard_target 0 + 2 = 2,
reflexivity
end
|
ad60b1111aa1dd81bc05da33c1d8eb91f5d162d9 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/simpCnstr1.lean | e55b1074b75c30f7a18f097b7100a7c9799fdf06 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,439 | lean | import Lean
open Lean in open Lean.Meta in
def test (declName : Name) : MetaM Unit := do
let info ← getConstInfo declName
forallTelescope info.type fun _ e => do
let some (e', p) ← Linear.simp? e none | throwError "failed to simplify{indentExpr e}"
check p
unless (← isDefEq (← inferType p) (← mkEq e e')) do
throwError "invalid proof"
IO.println s!"{← Meta.ppExpr e} ==> {← Meta.ppExpr e'}"
axiom ex1 (a b : Nat) : a + b + 1 + a < b + 4 + a
axiom ex2 (a b : Nat) : a + b + 1 + a = b + 4 + a + b
axiom ex3 (a b : Nat) : 5 = b + 4 + a + b
axiom ex4 (a b : Nat) : 4 = 1 + a
axiom ex5 (a b : Nat) : 4 + ((a + a) + b) + (a + a) + (b + b) ≤ 3 + (4*a + b) + b + 8 + 1
axiom ex6 (a b : Nat) : 4 = 8 + a
axiom ex7 (a b : Nat) : a + a ≤ 8 + a + a + b
axiom ex8 (a b c d : Nat) : b + a + c + d ≤ a + b + a + b
axiom ex9 (a b : Nat) : a + b + 1 + a > b + 4 + a
axiom ex10 (a b : Nat) : a + b + 1 + a ≥ b + 4 + a
axiom ex11 (a b : Nat) : ¬ (a + b + 1 + a < b + 4 + a)
axiom ex12 (a b : Nat) : ¬ (a + b + 1 + a > b + 4 + a)
axiom ex13 (a b : Nat) : ¬ (a + b + 1 + a ≤ b + 4 + a)
axiom ex14 (a b c d : Nat) : ¬ (a + d + b + 1 + a + d ≥ b + 4 + a + c)
#eval test ``ex1
#eval test ``ex2
#eval test ``ex3
#eval test ``ex4
#eval test ``ex5
#eval test ``ex6
#eval test ``ex7
#eval test ``ex8
#eval test ``ex9
#eval test ``ex10
#eval test ``ex11
#eval test ``ex12
#eval test ``ex13
#eval test ``ex14
|
95e7bda4f1d3fdd3c98f4bcd362fd7fe7a339ca9 | 7cdf3413c097e5d36492d12cdd07030eb991d394 | /src/game/world2/level4.lean | 9b6b9beface84373e3bf6df987748fcc793dc582 | [] | no_license | alreadydone/natural_number_game | 3135b9385a9f43e74cfbf79513fc37e69b99e0b3 | 1a39e693df4f4e871eb449890d3c7715a25c2ec9 | refs/heads/master | 1,599,387,390,105 | 1,573,200,587,000 | 1,573,200,691,000 | 220,397,084 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,573,192,734,000 | 1,573,192,733,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,075 | lean | import mynat.definition -- hide
import mynat.add -- hide
import game.world2.level3 -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# World 2 -- Addition world
## Level 4 (boss level) : `add_comm`
You are equipped with:
* `add_zero (a : mynat) : a + 0 = a`
* `add_succ (a b : mynat) : a + succ(b) = succ (a + b)`
* `zero_add (a : mynat) : 0 + a = a`
* `add_assoc (a b c : mynat) : (a + b) + c = a + (b + c)`
* `succ_add (a b : mynat) : succ a + b = succ (a + b)`
[boss battle music]
-/
/- Lemma
On the set of natural numbers, addition is commutative.
In other words, for all natural numbers $a$ and $b$, we have
$$ a + b = b + a. $$
-/
lemma add_comm (a b : mynat) : a + b = b + a :=
begin [less_leaky]
induction b with d hd,
{ -- ⊢ a + 0 = 0 + a,
rw zero_add,
rw add_zero,
refl
},
{
rw add_succ,
rw hd,
rw succ_add,
refl
}
end
/-
If you got this far -- nice! You're nearly ready to go onto
multiplication world. There are just a couple more useful lemmas
which you should prove first. Press on to level 5.
-/
end mynat -- hide
|
93285172aa45a1c22e97d38b84c777fa13cdd460 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /src/Lean/Server/Snapshots.lean | 488fec2aea11462bcb9945fb88edeaf2ab2f1114 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,656 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Wojciech Nawrocki. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wojciech Nawrocki
-/
import Init.System.IO
import Lean.Elab.Import
import Lean.Elab.Command
/-! One can think of this module as being a partial reimplementation
of Lean.Elab.Frontend which also stores a snapshot of the world after
each command. Importantly, we allow (re)starting compilation from any
snapshot/position in the file for interactive editing purposes. -/
namespace Lean
namespace Server
namespace Snapshots
open Elab
/-- The data associated with a snapshot is different depending on whether
it was produced from the header or from a command. -/
inductive SnapshotData where
| headerData : Command.State → SnapshotData
| cmdData : Command.State → SnapshotData
-- NOTE(WN): these carry the same dat but we leave open the future
-- possibility of more snapshot variants. For example, within tactic blocks.
deriving Inhabited
/-- What Lean knows about the world after the header and each command. -/
structure Snapshot where
/- Where the command which produced this snapshot begins. Note that
neighbouring snapshots are *not* necessarily attached beginning-to-end,
since inputs outside the grammar advance the parser but do not produce
snapshots. -/
beginPos : String.Pos
stx : Syntax
mpState : Parser.ModuleParserState
data : SnapshotData
deriving Inhabited
namespace Snapshot
def endPos (s : Snapshot) : String.Pos := s.mpState.pos
def toCmdState : Snapshot → Command.State
| { data := SnapshotData.headerData cmdState, .. } => cmdState
| { data := SnapshotData.cmdData cmdState, .. } => cmdState
def env (s : Snapshot) : Environment :=
s.toCmdState.env
def msgLog (s : Snapshot) : MessageLog :=
s.toCmdState.messages
end Snapshot
def reparseHeader (contents : String) (header : Snapshot) (opts : Options := {}) : IO Snapshot := do
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext contents "<input>"
let (_, newHeaderParserState, _) ← Parser.parseHeader inputCtx
pure { header with mpState := newHeaderParserState }
private def ioErrorFromEmpty (ex : Empty) : IO.Error :=
nomatch ex
/-- Parses the next command occurring after the given snapshot
without elaborating it. -/
def parseNextCmd (contents : String) (snap : Snapshot) : IO Syntax := do
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext contents "<input>"
let cmdState := snap.toCmdState
let scope := cmdState.scopes.head!
let pmctx := { env := cmdState.env, options := scope.opts, currNamespace := scope.currNamespace, openDecls := scope.openDecls }
let (cmdStx, _, _) :=
Parser.parseCommand inputCtx pmctx snap.mpState snap.msgLog
cmdStx
/--
Parse remaining file without elaboration. NOTE that doing so can lead to parse errors or even wrong syntax objects,
so it should only be done for reporting preliminary results! -/
partial def parseAhead (contents : String) (snap : Snapshot) : IO (Array Syntax) := do
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext contents "<input>"
let cmdState := snap.toCmdState
let scope := cmdState.scopes.head!
let pmctx := { env := cmdState.env, options := scope.opts, currNamespace := scope.currNamespace, openDecls := scope.openDecls }
go inputCtx pmctx snap.mpState #[]
where
go inputCtx pmctx cmdParserState stxs := do
let (cmdStx, cmdParserState, _) := Parser.parseCommand inputCtx pmctx cmdParserState snap.msgLog
if Parser.isEOI cmdStx || Parser.isExitCommand cmdStx then
stxs.push cmdStx
else
go inputCtx pmctx cmdParserState (stxs.push cmdStx)
/-- Compiles the next command occurring after the given snapshot.
If there is no next command (file ended), returns messages produced
through the file. -/
-- NOTE: This code is really very similar to Elab.Frontend. But generalizing it
-- over "store snapshots"/"don't store snapshots" would likely result in confusing
-- isServer? conditionals and not be worth it due to how short it is.
def compileNextCmd (contents : String) (snap : Snapshot) : IO (Sum Snapshot MessageLog) := do
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext contents "<input>"
let cmdState := snap.toCmdState
let scope := cmdState.scopes.head!
let pmctx := { env := cmdState.env, options := scope.opts, currNamespace := scope.currNamespace, openDecls := scope.openDecls }
let (cmdStx, cmdParserState, msgLog) :=
Parser.parseCommand inputCtx pmctx snap.mpState snap.msgLog
let cmdPos := cmdStx.getPos?.get!
if Parser.isEOI cmdStx || Parser.isExitCommand cmdStx then
Sum.inr msgLog
else
let cmdStateRef ← IO.mkRef { snap.toCmdState with messages := msgLog }
let cmdCtx : Elab.Command.Context := {
cmdPos := snap.endPos
fileName := inputCtx.fileName
fileMap := inputCtx.fileMap
}
EIO.toIO ioErrorFromEmpty $
Elab.Command.catchExceptions
(Elab.Command.elabCommand cmdStx)
cmdCtx cmdStateRef
let postCmdState ← cmdStateRef.get
let postCmdSnap : Snapshot := {
beginPos := cmdPos
stx := cmdStx
mpState := cmdParserState
data := SnapshotData.cmdData postCmdState
}
Sum.inl postCmdSnap
/-- Compiles all commands after the given snapshot. Returns them as a list, together with
the final message log. -/
partial def compileCmdsAfter (contents : String) (snap : Snapshot) : IO (List Snapshot × MessageLog) := do
let cmdOut ← compileNextCmd contents snap
match cmdOut with
| Sum.inl snap =>
let (snaps, msgLog) ← compileCmdsAfter contents snap
(snap :: snaps, msgLog)
| Sum.inr msgLog => ([], msgLog)
end Snapshots
end Server
end Lean
|
674efd1d9f7295e1e41ab1526d468e8bc979a079 | ed27983dd289b3bcad416f0b1927105d6ef19db8 | /src/inClassNotes/type_library/bool.lean | 8e7ffae47e6274cd77efdf6143d63555b5c3b0fc | [] | no_license | liuxin-James/complogic-s21 | 0d55b76dbe25024473d31d98b5b83655c365f811 | 13e03e0114626643b44015c654151fb651603486 | refs/heads/master | 1,681,109,264,463 | 1,618,848,261,000 | 1,618,848,261,000 | 337,599,491 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,613,141,619,000 | 1,612,925,555,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 938 | lean | #check bnot
namespace hidden
/-
The bool data type is a simple,
two-valued (true/false) type. A
set of operations is defined on
values of this type comprising
Boolean algebra.
EXERCISE: Complete this file as
instructed below.
-/
inductive bool : Type
| tt
| ff
/-
Note: The identifiers ff and tt
without qualification will refer
to Lean's built-in definitions
of these terms. Use bool.ff and
bool.tt throughout this file, to
be sure you're picking up *our*
definition of bool, not Lean's.
-/
def bnot : bool → bool
| bool.tt := bool.ff -- 0
| bool.ff := bool.tt -- 1
def band : bool → bool → bool
| bool.tt .tt := bool.tt
| _ _ := bool.ff
/-
EXERCISE: Implement the following
binary boolean operators. Use the
following names for the functions
with the give descriptions.
bor -- or / disjunction
bxor -- exclusive or
bimp -- implies
biff -- iff / equivalent
bnand -- not and
bnor -- not or
-/
end hidden |
560f3ca63e239f7b461bf48cef625b262ffd1947 | a4673261e60b025e2c8c825dfa4ab9108246c32e | /src/Lean/Meta/Basic.lean | 3d0d54ce1aa4a2ffd029dd2bf0d353a53724b5b8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/lean4 | c02dec0cc32c4bccab009285475f265f17d73228 | 2909313475588cc20ac0436e55548a4502050d0a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,129,550,893 | 1,606,415,348,000 | 1,606,415,348,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 45,125 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.LOption
import Lean.Environment
import Lean.Class
import Lean.ReducibilityAttrs
import Lean.Util.Trace
import Lean.Util.RecDepth
import Lean.Util.PPExt
import Lean.Compiler.InlineAttrs
import Lean.Meta.TransparencyMode
import Lean.Meta.DiscrTreeTypes
import Lean.Eval
import Lean.CoreM
/-
This module provides four (mutually dependent) goodies that are needed for building the elaborator and tactic frameworks.
1- Weak head normal form computation with support for metavariables and transparency modes.
2- Definitionally equality checking with support for metavariables (aka unification modulo definitional equality).
3- Type inference.
4- Type class resolution.
They are packed into the MetaM monad.
-/
namespace Lean.Meta
builtin_initialize isDefEqStuckExceptionId : InternalExceptionId ← registerInternalExceptionId `isDefEqStuck
structure Config :=
(foApprox : Bool := false)
(ctxApprox : Bool := false)
(quasiPatternApprox : Bool := false)
/- When `constApprox` is set to true,
we solve `?m t =?= c` using
`?m := fun _ => c`
when `?m t` is not a higher-order pattern and `c` is not an application as -/
(constApprox : Bool := false)
/-
When the following flag is set,
`isDefEq` throws the exeption `Exeption.isDefEqStuck`
whenever it encounters a constraint `?m ... =?= t` where
`?m` is read only.
This feature is useful for type class resolution where
we may want to notify the caller that the TC problem may be solveable
later after it assigns `?m`. -/
(isDefEqStuckEx : Bool := false)
(transparency : TransparencyMode := TransparencyMode.default)
/- If zetaNonDep == false, then non dependent let-decls are not zeta expanded. -/
(zetaNonDep : Bool := true)
/- When `trackZeta == true`, we store zetaFVarIds all free variables that have been zeta-expanded. -/
(trackZeta : Bool := false)
structure ParamInfo :=
(implicit : Bool := false)
(instImplicit : Bool := false)
(hasFwdDeps : Bool := false)
(backDeps : Array Nat := #[])
instance : Inhabited ParamInfo := ⟨{}⟩
def ParamInfo.isExplicit (p : ParamInfo) : Bool :=
!p.implicit && p.instImplicit
structure FunInfo :=
(paramInfo : Array ParamInfo := #[])
(resultDeps : Array Nat := #[])
structure InfoCacheKey :=
(transparency : TransparencyMode)
(expr : Expr)
(nargs? : Option Nat)
namespace InfoCacheKey
instance : Inhabited InfoCacheKey := ⟨⟨arbitrary, arbitrary, arbitrary⟩⟩
instance : Hashable InfoCacheKey :=
⟨fun ⟨transparency, expr, nargs⟩ => mixHash (hash transparency) $ mixHash (hash expr) (hash nargs)⟩
instance : BEq InfoCacheKey :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, e₁, n₁⟩ ⟨t₂, e₂, n₂⟩ => t₁ == t₂ && n₁ == n₂ && e₁ == e₂⟩
end InfoCacheKey
open Std (PersistentArray PersistentHashMap)
abbrev SynthInstanceCache := PersistentHashMap Expr (Option Expr)
structure Cache :=
(inferType : PersistentExprStructMap Expr := {})
(funInfo : PersistentHashMap InfoCacheKey FunInfo := {})
(synthInstance : SynthInstanceCache := {})
(whnfDefault : PersistentExprStructMap Expr := {}) -- cache for closed terms and `TransparencyMode.default`
(whnfAll : PersistentExprStructMap Expr := {}) -- cache for closed terms and `TransparencyMode.all`
structure PostponedEntry :=
(lhs : Level)
(rhs : Level)
structure State :=
(mctx : MetavarContext := {})
(cache : Cache := {})
/- When `trackZeta == true`, then any let-decl free variable that is zeta expansion performed by `MetaM` is stored in `zetaFVarIds`. -/
(zetaFVarIds : NameSet := {})
(postponed : PersistentArray PostponedEntry := {})
instance : Inhabited State := ⟨{}⟩
structure Context :=
(config : Config := {})
(lctx : LocalContext := {})
(localInstances : LocalInstances := #[])
abbrev MetaM := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State CoreM
instance : Inhabited (MetaM α) := {
default := fun _ _ => arbitrary
}
instance : MonadLCtx MetaM := {
getLCtx := do pure (← read).lctx
}
instance : MonadMCtx MetaM := {
getMCtx := do pure (← get).mctx,
modifyMCtx := fun f => modify fun s => { s with mctx := f s.mctx }
}
instance : AddMessageContext MetaM := {
addMessageContext := addMessageContextFull
}
@[inline] def MetaM.run (x : MetaM α) (ctx : Context := {}) (s : State := {}) : CoreM (α × State) :=
x ctx |>.run s
@[inline] def MetaM.run' (x : MetaM α) (ctx : Context := {}) (s : State := {}) : CoreM α :=
Prod.fst <$> x.run ctx s
@[inline] def MetaM.toIO (x : MetaM α) (ctxCore : Core.Context) (sCore : Core.State) (ctx : Context := {}) (s : State := {}) : IO (α × Core.State × State) := do
let ((a, s), sCore) ← (x.run ctx s).toIO ctxCore sCore
pure (a, sCore, s)
instance [MetaEval α] : MetaEval (MetaM α) :=
⟨fun env opts x _ => MetaEval.eval env opts x.run' true⟩
protected def throwIsDefEqStuck {α} : MetaM α :=
throw $ Exception.internal isDefEqStuckExceptionId
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Meta
registerTraceClass `Meta.debug
@[inline] def liftMetaM [MonadLiftT MetaM m] (x : MetaM α) : m α :=
liftM x
@[inline] def mapMetaM [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (f : forall {α}, MetaM α → MetaM α) {α} (x : m α) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => f $ runInBase x
@[inline] def map1MetaM [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (f : forall {α}, (β → MetaM α) → MetaM α) {α} (k : β → m α) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => f fun b => runInBase $ k b
@[inline] def map2MetaM [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (f : forall {α}, (β → γ → MetaM α) → MetaM α) {α} (k : β → γ → m α) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => f fun b c => runInBase $ k b c
section Methods
variables {m : Type → Type} [MonadLiftT MetaM m]
variables {n : Type → Type} [MonadControlT MetaM n] [Monad n]
def getLocalInstances : m LocalInstances := liftMetaM do pure (← read).localInstances
def getConfig : m Config := liftMetaM do pure (← read).config
def setMCtx (mctx : MetavarContext) : m Unit := liftMetaM $ modify fun s => { s with mctx := mctx }
def resetZetaFVarIds : m Unit := liftMetaM $ modify fun s => { s with zetaFVarIds := {} }
def getZetaFVarIds : m NameSet := liftMetaM do pure (← get).zetaFVarIds
def getPostponed : m (PersistentArray PostponedEntry) := liftMetaM do
pure (← get).postponed
def setPostponed (postponed : PersistentArray PostponedEntry) : m Unit := liftMetaM $
modify fun s => { s with postponed := postponed }
@[inline] def modifyPostponed (f : PersistentArray PostponedEntry → PersistentArray PostponedEntry) : m Unit := liftMetaM $
modify fun s => { s with postponed := f s.postponed }
builtin_initialize whnfRef : IO.Ref (Expr → MetaM Expr) ← IO.mkRef fun _ => throwError "whnf implementation was not set"
builtin_initialize inferTypeRef : IO.Ref (Expr → MetaM Expr) ← IO.mkRef fun _ => throwError "inferType implementation was not set"
builtin_initialize isExprDefEqAuxRef : IO.Ref (Expr → Expr → MetaM Bool) ← IO.mkRef fun _ _ => throwError "isDefEq implementation was not set"
builtin_initialize synthPendingRef : IO.Ref (MVarId → MetaM Bool) ← IO.mkRef fun _ => pure false
def whnf (e : Expr) : m Expr :=
liftMetaM $ withIncRecDepth do (← whnfRef.get) e
def whnfForall [Monad m] (e : Expr) : m Expr := do
let e' ← whnf e
if e'.isForall then pure e' else pure e
def inferType (e : Expr) : m Expr :=
liftMetaM $ withIncRecDepth do (← inferTypeRef.get) e
protected def isExprDefEqAux (t s : Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
withIncRecDepth do (← isExprDefEqAuxRef.get) t s
protected def synthPending (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Bool :=
withIncRecDepth do (← synthPendingRef.get) mvarId
-- withIncRecDepth for a monad `n` such that `[MonadControlT MetaM n]`
protected def withIncRecDepth {α} (x : n α) : n α :=
mapMetaM (withIncRecDepth (m := MetaM)) x
private def mkFreshExprMVarAtCore
(mvarId : MVarId) (lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) (type : Expr) (kind : MetavarKind) (userName : Name) (numScopeArgs : Nat) : MetaM Expr := do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.addExprMVarDecl mvarId userName lctx localInsts type kind numScopeArgs;
pure $ mkMVar mvarId
def mkFreshExprMVarAt
(lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) (type : Expr)
(kind : MetavarKind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName : Name := Name.anonymous) (numScopeArgs : Nat := 0)
: m Expr := liftMetaM do
let mvarId ← mkFreshId
mkFreshExprMVarAtCore mvarId lctx localInsts type kind userName numScopeArgs
def mkFreshLevelMVar : m Level := liftMetaM do
let mvarId ← mkFreshId
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.addLevelMVarDecl mvarId;
pure $ mkLevelMVar mvarId
private def mkFreshExprMVarCore (type : Expr) (kind : MetavarKind) (userName : Name) : MetaM Expr := do
let lctx ← getLCtx
let localInsts ← getLocalInstances
mkFreshExprMVarAt lctx localInsts type kind userName
private def mkFreshExprMVarImpl (type? : Option Expr) (kind : MetavarKind) (userName : Name) : MetaM Expr :=
match type? with
| some type => mkFreshExprMVarCore type kind userName
| none => do
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
let type ← mkFreshExprMVarCore (mkSort u) MetavarKind.natural Name.anonymous
mkFreshExprMVarCore type kind userName
def mkFreshExprMVar (type? : Option Expr) (kind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName := Name.anonymous) : m Expr :=
liftMetaM $ mkFreshExprMVarImpl type? kind userName
def mkFreshTypeMVar (kind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName := Name.anonymous) : m Expr := liftMetaM do
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
mkFreshExprMVar (mkSort u) kind userName
/- Low-level version of `MkFreshExprMVar` which allows users to create/reserve a `mvarId` using `mkFreshId`, and then later create
the metavar using this method. -/
private def mkFreshExprMVarWithIdCore (mvarId : MVarId) (type : Expr)
(kind : MetavarKind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName : Name := Name.anonymous) (numScopeArgs : Nat := 0)
: m Expr := liftMetaM do
let lctx ← getLCtx
let localInsts ← getLocalInstances
mkFreshExprMVarAtCore mvarId lctx localInsts type kind userName numScopeArgs
def mkFreshExprMVarWithIdImpl (mvarId : MVarId) (type? : Option Expr) (kind : MetavarKind) (userName : Name) : MetaM Expr :=
match type? with
| some type => mkFreshExprMVarWithIdCore mvarId type kind userName
| none => do
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
let type ← mkFreshExprMVar (mkSort u)
mkFreshExprMVarWithIdCore mvarId type kind userName
def mkFreshExprMVarWithId (mvarId : MVarId) (type? : Option Expr := none) (kind : MetavarKind := MetavarKind.natural) (userName := Name.anonymous) : m Expr :=
liftMetaM $ mkFreshExprMVarWithIdImpl mvarId type? kind userName
def shouldReduceAll : MetaM Bool := liftMetaM do
return (← read).config.transparency == TransparencyMode.all
def shouldReduceReducibleOnly : m Bool := liftMetaM do
return (← read).config.transparency == TransparencyMode.reducible
def getTransparency : m TransparencyMode := liftMetaM do
return (← read).config.transparency
def getMVarDecl (mvarId : MVarId) : m MetavarDecl := liftMetaM do
let mctx ← getMCtx
match mctx.findDecl? mvarId with
| some d => pure d
| none => throwError! "unknown metavariable '{mkMVar mvarId}'"
def setMVarKind (mvarId : MVarId) (kind : MetavarKind) : m Unit := liftMetaM do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.setMVarKind mvarId kind
/- Update the type of the given metavariable. This function assumes the new type is
definitionally equal to the current one -/
def setMVarType (mvarId : MVarId) (type : Expr) : m Unit := liftMetaM do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.setMVarType mvarId type
def isReadOnlyExprMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : m Bool := liftMetaM do
let mvarDecl ← getMVarDecl mvarId
let mctx ← getMCtx
pure $ mvarDecl.depth != mctx.depth
def isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaqueExprMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : m Bool := liftMetaM do
let mvarDecl ← getMVarDecl mvarId
match mvarDecl.kind with
| MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque => pure true
| _ => do
let mctx ← getMCtx
pure $ mvarDecl.depth != mctx.depth
def isReadOnlyLevelMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : m Bool := liftMetaM do
let mctx ← getMCtx
match mctx.findLevelDepth? mvarId with
| some depth => pure $ depth != mctx.depth
| _ => throwError! "unknown universe metavariable '{mkLevelMVar mvarId}'"
def renameMVar (mvarId : MVarId) (newUserName : Name) : m Unit := liftMetaM do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.renameMVar mvarId newUserName
def isExprMVarAssigned (mvarId : MVarId) : m Bool := liftMetaM do
let mctx ← getMCtx
pure $ mctx.isExprAssigned mvarId
def getExprMVarAssignment? (mvarId : MVarId) : m (Option Expr) := liftMetaM do
let mctx ← getMCtx
pure (mctx.getExprAssignment? mvarId)
def assignExprMVar (mvarId : MVarId) (val : Expr) : m Unit := liftMetaM do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.assignExpr mvarId val
def isDelayedAssigned (mvarId : MVarId) : m Bool := liftMetaM do
return (← getMCtx).isDelayedAssigned mvarId
def getDelayedAssignment? (mvarId : MVarId) : m (Option DelayedMetavarAssignment) := liftMetaM do
return (← getMCtx).getDelayedAssignment? mvarId
def hasAssignableMVar (e : Expr) : m Bool := liftMetaM do
return (← getMCtx).hasAssignableMVar e
def throwUnknownFVar {α} (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM α :=
throwError! "unknown free variable '{mkFVar fvarId}'"
def findLocalDecl? (fvarId : FVarId) : m (Option LocalDecl) := liftMetaM do
return (← getLCtx).find? fvarId
def getLocalDecl (fvarId : FVarId) : m LocalDecl := liftMetaM do
match (← getLCtx).find? fvarId with
| some d => pure d
| none => throwUnknownFVar fvarId
def getFVarLocalDecl (fvar : Expr) : m LocalDecl := liftMetaM do
getLocalDecl fvar.fvarId!
def getLocalDeclFromUserName (userName : Name) : m LocalDecl := liftMetaM do
match (← getLCtx).findFromUserName? userName with
| some d => pure d
| none => throwError! "unknown local declaration '{userName}'"
def instantiateLevelMVarsImp (u : Level) : MetaM Level :=
MetavarContext.instantiateLevelMVars u
def instantiateLevelMVars (u : Level) : m Level := liftMetaM do
instantiateLevelMVarsImp u
def instantiateMVarsImp (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
(MetavarContext.instantiateExprMVars e).run
def instantiateMVars (e : Expr) : m Expr := liftMetaM do
instantiateMVarsImp e
def instantiateLocalDeclMVars (localDecl : LocalDecl) : m LocalDecl := liftMetaM do
match localDecl with
| LocalDecl.cdecl idx id n type bi =>
let type ← instantiateMVars type
pure $ LocalDecl.cdecl idx id n type bi
| LocalDecl.ldecl idx id n type val nonDep =>
let type ← instantiateMVars type
let val ← instantiateMVars val
pure $ LocalDecl.ldecl idx id n type val nonDep
@[inline] private def liftMkBindingM {α} (x : MetavarContext.MkBindingM α) : MetaM α := do
match x (← getLCtx) { mctx := (← getMCtx), ngen := (← getNGen) } with
| EStateM.Result.ok e newS => do
setNGen newS.ngen;
setMCtx newS.mctx;
pure e
| EStateM.Result.error (MetavarContext.MkBinding.Exception.revertFailure mctx lctx toRevert decl) newS => do
setMCtx newS.mctx;
setNGen newS.ngen;
throwError "failed to create binder due to failure when reverting variable dependencies"
def mkForallFVarsImp (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
if xs.isEmpty then pure e else liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.mkForall xs e
def mkForallFVars (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : m Expr := liftMetaM do
mkForallFVarsImp xs e
def mkLambdaFVarsImp (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
if xs.isEmpty then pure e else liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.mkLambda xs e
def mkLambdaFVars (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : m Expr := liftMetaM do
mkLambdaFVarsImp xs e
def mkLetFVars (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : m Expr :=
mkLambdaFVars xs e
def mkArrow (d b : Expr) : m Expr := liftMetaM do
let n ← mkFreshUserName `x
return Lean.mkForall n BinderInfo.default d b
def mkForallUsedOnlyImp (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : MetaM (Expr × Nat) := do
if xs.isEmpty then pure (e, 0) else liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.mkForallUsedOnly xs e
def mkForallUsedOnly (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : m (Expr × Nat) := liftMetaM do
mkForallUsedOnlyImp xs e
def elimMVarDepsImp (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) (preserveOrder : Bool := false) : MetaM Expr :=
if xs.isEmpty then pure e else liftMkBindingM <| MetavarContext.elimMVarDeps xs e preserveOrder
def elimMVarDeps (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr) (preserveOrder : Bool := false) : m Expr := liftMetaM do
elimMVarDepsImp xs e preserveOrder
@[inline] def withConfig {α} (f : Config → Config) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with config := f ctx.config })
@[inline] def withTrackingZeta {α} (x : n α) : n α :=
withConfig (fun cfg => { cfg with trackZeta := true }) x
@[inline] def withTransparency {α} (mode : TransparencyMode) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM <| withConfig (fun config => { config with transparency := mode })
@[inline] def withReducible {α} (x : n α) : n α :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.reducible x
@[inline] def withAtLeastTransparency {α} (mode : TransparencyMode) (x : n α) : n α :=
withConfig
(fun config =>
let oldMode := config.transparency
let mode := if oldMode.lt mode then mode else oldMode
{ config with transparency := mode })
x
def getConst? (constName : Name) : MetaM (Option ConstantInfo) := do
let env ← getEnv
match env.find? constName with
| some (info@(ConstantInfo.thmInfo _)) =>
if (← shouldReduceAll) then
pure (some info)
else
pure none
| some (info@(ConstantInfo.defnInfo _)) =>
if (← shouldReduceReducibleOnly) then
if (← isReducible constName) then
pure (some info)
else
pure none
else
pure (some info)
| some info => pure (some info)
| none => throwUnknownConstant constName
def getConstNoEx? (constName : Name) : MetaM (Option ConstantInfo) := do
let env ← getEnv
match env.find? constName with
| some (info@(ConstantInfo.thmInfo _)) =>
if (← shouldReduceAll) then
pure (some info)
else
pure none
| some (info@(ConstantInfo.defnInfo _)) =>
if (← shouldReduceReducibleOnly) then
if (← isReducible constName) then
pure (some info)
else
pure none
else
pure (some info)
| some info => pure (some info)
| none => pure none
/-- Save cache, execute `x`, restore cache -/
@[inline] private def savingCacheImpl {α} (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let s ← get
let savedCache := s.cache
try x finally modify fun s => { s with cache := savedCache }
@[inline] def savingCache {α} : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM savingCacheImpl
private def isClassQuickConst? (constName : Name) : MetaM (LOption Name) := do
let env ← getEnv
if isClass env constName then
pure (LOption.some constName)
else
match (← getConst? constName) with
| some _ => pure LOption.undef
| none => pure LOption.none
private partial def isClassQuick? : Expr → MetaM (LOption Name)
| Expr.bvar .. => pure LOption.none
| Expr.lit .. => pure LOption.none
| Expr.fvar .. => pure LOption.none
| Expr.sort .. => pure LOption.none
| Expr.lam .. => pure LOption.none
| Expr.letE .. => pure LOption.undef
| Expr.proj .. => pure LOption.undef
| Expr.forallE _ _ b _ => isClassQuick? b
| Expr.mdata _ e _ => isClassQuick? e
| Expr.const n _ _ => isClassQuickConst? n
| Expr.mvar mvarId _ => do
match (← getExprMVarAssignment? mvarId) with
| some val => isClassQuick? val
| none => pure LOption.none
| Expr.app f _ _ =>
match f.getAppFn with
| Expr.const n .. => isClassQuickConst? n
| Expr.lam .. => pure LOption.undef
| _ => pure LOption.none
def saveAndResetSynthInstanceCache : MetaM SynthInstanceCache := do
let s ← get
let savedSythInstance := s.cache.synthInstance
modify fun s => { s with cache := { s.cache with synthInstance := {} } }
pure savedSythInstance
def restoreSynthInstanceCache (cache : SynthInstanceCache) : MetaM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with cache := { s.cache with synthInstance := cache } }
@[inline] private def resettingSynthInstanceCacheImpl {α} (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let savedSythInstance ← saveAndResetSynthInstanceCache
try x finally restoreSynthInstanceCache savedSythInstance
/-- Reset `synthInstance` cache, execute `x`, and restore cache -/
@[inline] def resettingSynthInstanceCache {α} : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM resettingSynthInstanceCacheImpl
@[inline] def resettingSynthInstanceCacheWhen {α} (b : Bool) (x : n α) : n α :=
if b then resettingSynthInstanceCache x else x
private def withNewLocalInstanceImp {α} (className : Name) (fvar : Expr) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let localDecl ← getFVarLocalDecl fvar
/- Recall that we use `auxDecl` binderInfo when compiling recursive declarations. -/
match localDecl.binderInfo with
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => k
| _ =>
resettingSynthInstanceCache $
withReader
(fun ctx => { ctx with localInstances := ctx.localInstances.push { className := className, fvar := fvar } })
k
/-- Add entry `{ className := className, fvar := fvar }` to localInstances,
and then execute continuation `k`.
It resets the type class cache using `resettingSynthInstanceCache`. -/
def withNewLocalInstance {α} (className : Name) (fvar : Expr) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM $ withNewLocalInstanceImp className fvar
private def fvarsSizeLtMaxFVars (fvars : Array Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) : Bool :=
match maxFVars? with
| some maxFVars => fvars.size < maxFVars
| none => true
mutual
/--
`withNewLocalInstances isClassExpensive fvars j k` updates the vector or local instances
using free variables `fvars[j] ... fvars.back`, and execute `k`.
- `isClassExpensive` is defined later.
- The type class chache is reset whenever a new local instance is found.
- `isClassExpensive` uses `whnf` which depends (indirectly) on the set of local instances.
Thus, each new local instance requires a new `resettingSynthInstanceCache`. -/
private partial def withNewLocalInstancesImp {α}
(fvars : Array Expr) (i : Nat) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
if h : i < fvars.size then
let fvar := fvars.get ⟨i, h⟩
let decl ← getFVarLocalDecl fvar
match (← isClassQuick? decl.type) with
| LOption.none => withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
| LOption.undef =>
match (← isClassExpensive? decl.type) with
| none => withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
| some c => withNewLocalInstance c fvar $ withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
| LOption.some c => withNewLocalInstance c fvar $ withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars (i+1) k
else
k
/--
`forallTelescopeAuxAux lctx fvars j type`
Remarks:
- `lctx` is the `MetaM` local context extended with declarations for `fvars`.
- `type` is the type we are computing the telescope for. It contains only
dangling bound variables in the range `[j, fvars.size)`
- if `reducing? == true` and `type` is not `forallE`, we use `whnf`.
- when `type` is not a `forallE` nor it can't be reduced to one, we
excute the continuation `k`.
Here is an example that demonstrates the `reducing?`.
Suppose we have
```
abbrev StateM s a := s -> Prod a s
```
Now, assume we are trying to build the telescope for
```
forall (x : Nat), StateM Int Bool
```
if `reducing == true`, the function executes `k #[(x : Nat) (s : Int)] Bool`.
if `reducing == false`, the function executes `k #[(x : Nat)] (StateM Int Bool)`
if `maxFVars?` is `some max`, then we interrupt the telescope construction
when `fvars.size == max`
-/
private partial def forallTelescopeReducingAuxAux {α}
(reducing : Bool) (maxFVars? : Option Nat)
(type : Expr)
(k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let rec process (lctx : LocalContext) (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) (type : Expr) : MetaM α := do
match type with
| Expr.forallE n d b c =>
if fvarsSizeLtMaxFVars fvars maxFVars? then
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshId
let lctx := lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n d c.binderInfo
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
let fvars := fvars.push fvar
process lctx fvars j b
else
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j do
k fvars type
| _ =>
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j do
if reducing && fvarsSizeLtMaxFVars fvars maxFVars? then
let newType ← whnf type
if newType.isForall then
process lctx fvars fvars.size newType
else
k fvars type
else
k fvars type
process (← getLCtx) #[] 0 type
private partial def forallTelescopeReducingAux {α} (type : Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
match maxFVars? with
| some 0 => k #[] type
| _ => do
let newType ← whnf type
if newType.isForall then
forallTelescopeReducingAuxAux true maxFVars? newType k
else
k #[] type
private partial def isClassExpensive? : Expr → MetaM (Option Name)
| type => withReducible $ -- when testing whether a type is a type class, we only unfold reducible constants.
forallTelescopeReducingAux type none fun xs type => do
match type.getAppFn with
| Expr.const c _ _ => do
let env ← getEnv
pure $ if isClass env c then some c else none
| _ => pure none
private partial def isClassImp? (type : Expr) : MetaM (Option Name) := do
match (← isClassQuick? type) with
| LOption.none => pure none
| LOption.some c => pure (some c)
| LOption.undef => isClassExpensive? type
end
private def withNewLocalInstancesImpAux {α} (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM $ withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j
partial def withNewLocalInstances {α} (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM $ withNewLocalInstancesImpAux fvars j
def isClass? (type : Expr) : m (Option Name) :=
liftMetaM do try isClassImp? type catch _ => pure none
@[inline] private def forallTelescopeImp {α} (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
forallTelescopeReducingAuxAux (reducing := false) (maxFVars? := none) type k
/--
Given `type` of the form `forall xs, A`, execute `k xs A`.
This combinator will declare local declarations, create free variables for them,
execute `k` with updated local context, and make sure the cache is restored after executing `k`. -/
def forallTelescope {α} (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => forallTelescopeImp type k) k
private def forallTelescopeReducingImp {α} (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
forallTelescopeReducingAux type (maxFVars? := none) k
/--
Similar to `forallTelescope`, but given `type` of the form `forall xs, A`,
it reduces `A` and continues bulding the telescope if it is a `forall`. -/
def forallTelescopeReducing {α} (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => forallTelescopeReducingImp type k) k
private def forallBoundedTelescopeImp {α} (type : Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
forallTelescopeReducingAux type maxFVars? k
/--
Similar to `forallTelescopeReducing`, stops constructing the telescope when
it reaches size `maxFVars`. -/
def forallBoundedTelescope {α} (type : Expr) (maxFVars? : Option Nat) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => forallBoundedTelescopeImp type maxFVars? k) k
/-- Similar to `forallTelescopeAuxAux` but for lambda and let expressions. -/
private partial def lambdaTelescopeAux {α}
(k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α)
: Bool → LocalContext → Array Expr → Nat → Expr → MetaM α
| consumeLet, lctx, fvars, j, Expr.lam n d b c => do
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshId
let lctx := lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n d c.binderInfo
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
lambdaTelescopeAux k consumeLet lctx (fvars.push fvar) j b
| true, lctx, fvars, j, Expr.letE n t v b _ => do
let t := t.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let v := v.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshId
let lctx := lctx.mkLetDecl fvarId n t v
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
lambdaTelescopeAux k true lctx (fvars.push fvar) j b
| _, lctx, fvars, j, e =>
let e := e.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j do
k fvars e
private partial def lambdaTelescopeImp {α} (e : Expr) (consumeLet : Bool) (k : Array Expr → Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let rec process (consumeLet : Bool) (lctx : LocalContext) (fvars : Array Expr) (j : Nat) (e : Expr) : MetaM α := do
match consumeLet, e with
| _, Expr.lam n d b c =>
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshId
let lctx := lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n d c.binderInfo
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
process consumeLet lctx (fvars.push fvar) j b
| true, Expr.letE n t v b _ => do
let t := t.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let v := v.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
let fvarId ← mkFreshId
let lctx := lctx.mkLetDecl fvarId n t v
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
process true lctx (fvars.push fvar) j b
| _, e =>
let e := e.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewLocalInstancesImp fvars j do
k fvars e
process consumeLet (← getLCtx) #[] 0 e
/-- Similar to `forallTelescope` but for lambda and let expressions. -/
def lambdaLetTelescope {α} (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => lambdaTelescopeImp type true k) k
/-- Similar to `forallTelescope` but for lambda expressions. -/
def lambdaTelescope {α} (type : Expr) (k : Array Expr → Expr → n α) : n α :=
map2MetaM (fun k => lambdaTelescopeImp type false k) k
def getParamNamesImp (declName : Name) : MetaM (Array Name) := do
let cinfo ← getConstInfo declName
forallTelescopeReducing cinfo.type fun xs _ => do
xs.mapM fun x => do
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl x.fvarId!
pure localDecl.userName
/-- Return the parameter names for the givel global declaration. -/
def getParamNames (declName : Name) : m (Array Name) :=
liftMetaM $ getParamNamesImp declName
-- `kind` specifies the metavariable kind for metavariables not corresponding to instance implicit `[ ... ]` arguments.
private partial def forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux
(e : Expr) (reducing : Bool) (maxMVars? : Option Nat) (kind : MetavarKind) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
let rec process (mvars : Array Expr) (bis : Array BinderInfo) (j : Nat) (type : Expr) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := do
match type with
| Expr.forallE n d b c =>
let cont : Unit → MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := fun _ => do
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars
let k := if c.binderInfo.isInstImplicit then MetavarKind.synthetic else kind
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar d k n
let mvars := mvars.push mvar
let bis := bis.push c.binderInfo
process mvars bis j b
match maxMVars? with
| none => cont ()
| some maxMVars =>
if mvars.size < maxMVars then
cont ()
else
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars;
pure (mvars, bis, type)
| _ =>
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars;
if reducing then do
let newType ← whnf type;
if newType.isForall then
process mvars bis mvars.size newType
else
pure (mvars, bis, type)
else
pure (mvars, bis, type)
process #[] #[] 0 e
/-- Similar to `forallTelescope`, but creates metavariables instead of free variables. -/
def forallMetaTelescope (e : Expr) (kind := MetavarKind.natural) : m (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
liftMetaM $ forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux e (reducing := false) (maxMVars? := none) kind
/-- Similar to `forallTelescopeReducing`, but creates metavariables instead of free variables. -/
def forallMetaTelescopeReducing (e : Expr) (maxMVars? : Option Nat := none) (kind := MetavarKind.natural) : m (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
liftMetaM $ forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux e (reducing := true) maxMVars? kind
/-- Similar to `forallMetaTelescopeReducingAux` but for lambda expressions. -/
private partial def lambdaMetaTelescopeImp (e : Expr) (maxMVars? : Option Nat) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
let rec process (mvars : Array Expr) (bis : Array BinderInfo) (j : Nat) (type : Expr) : MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := do
let finalize : Unit → MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := fun _ => do
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars
pure (mvars, bis, type)
let cont : Unit → MetaM (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) := fun _ => do
match type with
| Expr.lam n d b c =>
let d := d.instantiateRevRange j mvars.size mvars
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar d
let mvars := mvars.push mvar
let bis := bis.push c.binderInfo
process mvars bis j b
| _ => finalize ()
match maxMVars? with
| none => cont ()
| some maxMVars =>
if mvars.size < maxMVars then
cont ()
else
finalize ()
process #[] #[] 0 e
/-- Similar to `forallMetaTelescope` but for lambda expressions. -/
partial def lambdaMetaTelescope (e : Expr) (maxMVars? : Option Nat := none) : m (Array Expr × Array BinderInfo × Expr) :=
liftMetaM $ lambdaMetaTelescopeImp e maxMVars?
private def withNewFVar {α} (fvar fvarType : Expr) (k : Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
match (← isClass? fvarType) with
| none => k fvar
| some c => withNewLocalInstance c fvar $ k fvar
private def withLocalDeclImp {α} (n : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (type : Expr) (k : Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let fvarId ← mkFreshId
let ctx ← read
let lctx := ctx.lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n type bi
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewFVar fvar type k
def withLocalDecl {α} (name : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (type : Expr) (k : Expr → n α) : n α :=
map1MetaM (fun k => withLocalDeclImp name bi type k) k
def withLocalDeclD {α} (name : Name) (type : Expr) (k : Expr → n α) : n α :=
withLocalDecl name BinderInfo.default type k
private def withLetDeclImp {α} (n : Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (k : Expr → MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let fvarId ← mkFreshId
let ctx ← read
let lctx := ctx.lctx.mkLetDecl fvarId n type val
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
withNewFVar fvar type k
def withLetDecl {α} (name : Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (k : Expr → n α) : n α :=
map1MetaM (fun k => withLetDeclImp name type val k) k
private def withExistingLocalDeclsImp {α} (decls : List LocalDecl) (k : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let ctx ← read
let numLocalInstances := ctx.localInstances.size
let lctx := decls.foldl (fun (lctx : LocalContext) decl => lctx.addDecl decl) ctx.lctx
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx }) do
let newLocalInsts ← decls.foldlM
(fun (newlocalInsts : Array LocalInstance) (decl : LocalDecl) => (do {
match (← isClass? decl.type) with
| none => pure newlocalInsts
| some c => pure $ newlocalInsts.push { className := c, fvar := decl.toExpr } } : MetaM _))
ctx.localInstances;
if newLocalInsts.size == numLocalInstances then
k
else
resettingSynthInstanceCache $ withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with localInstances := newLocalInsts }) k
def withExistingLocalDecls {α} (decls : List LocalDecl) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM $ withExistingLocalDeclsImp decls
private def withNewMCtxDepthImp {α} (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let s ← get
let savedMCtx := s.mctx
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.incDepth
try x finally setMCtx savedMCtx
/--
Save cache and `MetavarContext`, bump the `MetavarContext` depth, execute `x`,
and restore saved data. -/
def withNewMCtxDepth {α} : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM withNewMCtxDepthImp
private def withLocalContextImp {α} (lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let localInstsCurr ← getLocalInstances
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with lctx := lctx, localInstances := localInsts }) do
if localInsts == localInstsCurr then
x
else
resettingSynthInstanceCache x
def withLCtx {α} (lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM $ withLocalContextImp lctx localInsts
private def withMVarContextImp {α} (mvarId : MVarId) (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let mvarDecl ← getMVarDecl mvarId
withLocalContextImp mvarDecl.lctx mvarDecl.localInstances x
/--
Execute `x` using the given metavariable `LocalContext` and `LocalInstances`.
The type class resolution cache is flushed when executing `x` if its `LocalInstances` are
different from the current ones. -/
def withMVarContext {α} (mvarId : MVarId) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM $ withMVarContextImp mvarId
private def withMCtxImp {α} (mctx : MetavarContext) (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let mctx' ← getMCtx
setMCtx mctx
try x finally setMCtx mctx'
def withMCtx {α} (mctx : MetavarContext) : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM $ withMCtxImp mctx
@[inline] private def approxDefEqImp {α} (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
withConfig (fun config => { config with foApprox := true, ctxApprox := true, quasiPatternApprox := true}) x
/-- Execute `x` using approximate unification: `foApprox`, `ctxApprox` and `quasiPatternApprox`. -/
@[inline] def approxDefEq {α} : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM approxDefEqImp
@[inline] private def fullApproxDefEqImp {α} (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
withConfig (fun config => { config with foApprox := true, ctxApprox := true, quasiPatternApprox := true, constApprox := true }) x
/--
Similar to `approxDefEq`, but uses all available approximations.
We don't use `constApprox` by default at `approxDefEq` because it often produces undesirable solution for monadic code.
For example, suppose we have `pure (x > 0)` which has type `?m Prop`. We also have the goal `[Pure ?m]`.
Now, assume the expected type is `IO Bool`. Then, the unification constraint `?m Prop =?= IO Bool` could be solved
as `?m := fun _ => IO Bool` using `constApprox`, but this spurious solution would generate a failure when we try to
solve `[Pure (fun _ => IO Bool)]` -/
@[inline] def fullApproxDefEq {α} : n α → n α :=
mapMetaM fullApproxDefEqImp
def normalizeLevel (u : Level) : m Level :=
liftMetaM do let u ← instantiateLevelMVars u; pure u.normalize
def assignLevelMVar (mvarId : MVarId) (u : Level) : m Unit := liftMetaM do
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.assignLevel mvarId u
def whnfD [MonadLiftT MetaM n] (e : Expr) : n Expr :=
withTransparency TransparencyMode.default $ whnf e
def setInlineAttribute (declName : Name) (kind := Compiler.InlineAttributeKind.inline): m Unit := liftMetaM do
let env ← getEnv
match Compiler.setInlineAttribute env declName kind with
| Except.ok env => setEnv env
| Except.error msg => throwError msg
private partial def instantiateForallAux (ps : Array Expr) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
if h : i < ps.size then
let p := ps.get ⟨i, h⟩
let e ← whnf e
match e with
| Expr.forallE _ _ b _ => instantiateForallAux ps (i+1) (b.instantiate1 p)
| _ => throwError "invalid instantiateForall, too many parameters"
else
pure e
/- Given `e` of the form `forall (a_1 : A_1) ... (a_n : A_n), B[a_1, ..., a_n]` and `p_1 : A_1, ... p_n : A_n`, return `B[p_1, ..., p_n]`. -/
def instantiateForall (e : Expr) (ps : Array Expr) : m Expr :=
liftMetaM $ instantiateForallAux ps 0 e
private partial def instantiateLambdaAux (ps : Array Expr) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
if h : i < ps.size then
let p := ps.get ⟨i, h⟩
let e ← whnf e
match e with
| Expr.lam _ _ b _ => instantiateLambdaAux ps (i+1) (b.instantiate1 p)
| _ => throwError "invalid instantiateLambda, too many parameters"
else
pure e
/- Given `e` of the form `fun (a_1 : A_1) ... (a_n : A_n) => t[a_1, ..., a_n]` and `p_1 : A_1, ... p_n : A_n`, return `t[p_1, ..., p_n]`.
It uses `whnf` to reduce `e` if it is not a lambda -/
def instantiateLambda (e : Expr) (ps : Array Expr) : m Expr :=
liftMetaM $ instantiateLambdaAux ps 0 e
/-- Return true iff `e` depends on the free variable `fvarId` -/
def dependsOn (e : Expr) (fvarId : FVarId) : m Bool := liftMetaM do
let mctx ← getMCtx
pure $ mctx.exprDependsOn e fvarId
def ppExprImp (e : Expr) : MetaM Format := do
let env ← getEnv
let mctx ← getMCtx
let lctx ← getLCtx
let opts ← getOptions
let ctxCore ← readThe Core.Context
Lean.ppExpr { env := env, mctx := mctx, lctx := lctx, opts := opts, currNamespace := ctxCore.currNamespace, openDecls := ctxCore.openDecls } e
def ppExpr (e : Expr) : m Format :=
liftMetaM $ ppExprImp e
@[inline] protected def orelse {α} (x y : MetaM α) : MetaM α := do
let env ← getEnv
let mctx ← getMCtx
try x catch _ => setEnv env; setMCtx mctx; y
instance {α} : OrElse (MetaM α) := ⟨Meta.orelse⟩
@[inline] private def orelseMergeErrorsImp {α} (x y : MetaM α)
(mergeRef : Syntax → Syntax → Syntax := fun r₁ r₂ => r₁)
(mergeMsg : MessageData → MessageData → MessageData := fun m₁ m₂ => m₁ ++ Format.line ++ m₂) : MetaM α := do
let env ← getEnv
let mctx ← getMCtx
try
x
catch ex =>
setEnv env
setMCtx mctx
match ex with
| Exception.error ref₁ m₁ =>
try
y
catch
| Exception.error ref₂ m₂ => throw $ Exception.error (mergeRef ref₁ ref₂) (mergeMsg m₁ m₂)
| ex => throw ex
| ex => throw ex
/--
Similar to `orelse`, but merge errors. Note that internal errors are not caught.
The default `mergeRef` uses the `ref` (position information) for the first message.
The default `mergeMsg` combines error messages using `Format.line ++ Format.line` as a separator. -/
@[inline] def orelseMergeErrors {α m} [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (x y : m α)
(mergeRef : Syntax → Syntax → Syntax := fun r₁ r₂ => r₁)
(mergeMsg : MessageData → MessageData → MessageData := fun m₁ m₂ => m₁ ++ Format.line ++ Format.line ++ m₂) : m α := do
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => orelseMergeErrorsImp (runInBase x) (runInBase y) mergeRef mergeMsg
/-- Execute `x`, and apply `f` to the produced error message -/
def mapErrorImp {α} (x : MetaM α) (f : MessageData → MessageData) : MetaM α := do
try
x
catch
| Exception.error ref msg => throw $ Exception.error ref $ f msg
| ex => throw ex
@[inline] def mapError {α m} [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (x : m α) (f : MessageData → MessageData) : m α :=
controlAt MetaM fun runInBase => mapErrorImp (runInBase x) f
/-- `commitWhenSome? x` executes `x` and keep modifications when it returns `some a`. -/
@[specialize] def commitWhenSome? {α} (x? : MetaM (Option α)) : MetaM (Option α) := do
let env ← getEnv
let mctx ← getMCtx
try
match (← x?) with
| some a => pure (some a)
| none =>
setEnv env
setMCtx mctx
pure none
catch ex =>
setEnv env
setMCtx mctx
throw ex
end Methods
end Meta
export Meta (MetaM)
end Lean
|
7c9b1364e629d64799d5c8d2ea1aab0d90583410 | 23c79f5a2b724d0a6865a697f74bc337c40a1c17 | /verified-counting/src/list_lemma.lean | dc60003d1167b2d9458ed97195e6f5e43f984b29 | [] | no_license | mukeshtiwari/Puzzles | 145e679e637d1c36363c90863cba7c0fda0190b1 | 4a760e7dc6c65cab0fde86d0296d863c62fdda29 | refs/heads/master | 1,608,024,738,873 | 1,607,504,305,000 | 1,607,504,305,000 | 5,691,003 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 691 | lean | import
tactic.find tactic.omega
data.vector tactic.basic
lemma zip_with_len_l {α β γ : Type*} {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {f : α → β → γ}
(h : list.length l₁ = list.length l₂) :
list.length (list.zip_with f l₁ l₂) = list.length l₁ :=
begin
induction l₁ with x xs ih generalizing l₂,
{simp [list.zip_with]},
{
cases l₂ with y ys,
{injection h},
{simp only [list.zip_with, list.length], finish}
}
end
lemma map_with_len_l {α β : Type*} {l₁ : list α} {f : α → β} :
list.length (list.map f l₁) = list.length l₁ :=
begin
induction l₁ with x xs ih,
{simp [list.map]},
{simp [list.map]},
end |
af8e44c2de52e8703e79f87106dec2097bef66b1 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/order/hom/lattice.lean | 033a64c543d1556d2c70beb05078c4cd5c0b1c36 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 42,781 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import data.finset.lattice
import order.hom.bounded
import order.symm_diff
/-!
# Lattice homomorphisms
This file defines (bounded) lattice homomorphisms.
We use the `fun_like` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `sup_hom`: Maps which preserve `⊔`.
* `inf_hom`: Maps which preserve `⊓`.
* `sup_bot_hom`: Finitary supremum homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊔` and `⊥`.
* `inf_top_hom`: Finitary infimum homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊓` and `⊤`.
* `lattice_hom`: Lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊔` and `⊓`.
* `bounded_lattice_hom`: Bounded lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊤`, `⊥`, `⊔` and `⊓`.
## Typeclasses
* `sup_hom_class`
* `inf_hom_class`
* `sup_bot_hom_class`
* `inf_top_hom_class`
* `lattice_hom_class`
* `bounded_lattice_hom_class`
## TODO
Do we need more intersections between `bot_hom`, `top_hom` and lattice homomorphisms?
-/
open function order_dual
variables {F ι α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of `⊔`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure sup_hom (α β : Type*) [has_sup α] [has_sup β] :=
(to_fun : α → β)
(map_sup' (a b : α) : to_fun (a ⊔ b) = to_fun a ⊔ to_fun b)
/-- The type of `⊓`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure inf_hom (α β : Type*) [has_inf α] [has_inf β] :=
(to_fun : α → β)
(map_inf' (a b : α) : to_fun (a ⊓ b) = to_fun a ⊓ to_fun b)
/-- The type of finitary supremum-preserving homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure sup_bot_hom (α β : Type*) [has_sup α] [has_sup β] [has_bot α] [has_bot β]
extends sup_hom α β :=
(map_bot' : to_fun ⊥ = ⊥)
/-- The type of finitary infimum-preserving homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure inf_top_hom (α β : Type*) [has_inf α] [has_inf β] [has_top α] [has_top β]
extends inf_hom α β :=
(map_top' : to_fun ⊤ = ⊤)
/-- The type of lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure lattice_hom (α β : Type*) [lattice α] [lattice β] extends sup_hom α β :=
(map_inf' (a b : α) : to_fun (a ⊓ b) = to_fun a ⊓ to_fun b)
/-- The type of bounded lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure bounded_lattice_hom (α β : Type*) [lattice α] [lattice β] [bounded_order α]
[bounded_order β]
extends lattice_hom α β :=
(map_top' : to_fun ⊤ = ⊤)
(map_bot' : to_fun ⊥ = ⊥)
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- `sup_hom_class F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊔`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `sup_hom`. -/
class sup_hom_class (F : Type*) (α β : out_param $ Type*) [has_sup α] [has_sup β]
extends fun_like F α (λ _, β) :=
(map_sup (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
/-- `inf_hom_class F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊓`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `inf_hom`. -/
class inf_hom_class (F : Type*) (α β : out_param $ Type*) [has_inf α] [has_inf β]
extends fun_like F α (λ _, β) :=
(map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
/-- `sup_bot_hom_class F α β` states that `F` is a type of finitary supremum-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `sup_bot_hom`. -/
class sup_bot_hom_class (F : Type*) (α β : out_param $ Type*) [has_sup α] [has_sup β] [has_bot α]
[has_bot β] extends sup_hom_class F α β :=
(map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥)
/-- `inf_top_hom_class F α β` states that `F` is a type of finitary infimum-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `sup_bot_hom`. -/
class inf_top_hom_class (F : Type*) (α β : out_param $ Type*) [has_inf α]
[has_inf β] [has_top α] [has_top β] extends inf_hom_class F α β :=
(map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤)
/-- `lattice_hom_class F α β` states that `F` is a type of lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `lattice_hom`. -/
class lattice_hom_class (F : Type*) (α β : out_param $ Type*) [lattice α] [lattice β]
extends sup_hom_class F α β :=
(map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
/-- `bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β` states that `F` is a type of bounded lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `bounded_lattice_hom`. -/
class bounded_lattice_hom_class (F : Type*) (α β : out_param $ Type*) [lattice α] [lattice β]
[bounded_order α] [bounded_order β]
extends lattice_hom_class F α β :=
(map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤)
(map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥)
end
export sup_hom_class (map_sup)
export inf_hom_class (map_inf)
attribute [simp] map_top map_bot map_sup map_inf
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance sup_hom_class.to_order_hom_class [semilattice_sup α] [semilattice_sup β]
[sup_hom_class F α β] :
order_hom_class F α β :=
{ map_rel := λ f a b h, by rw [←sup_eq_right, ←map_sup, sup_eq_right.2 h],
..‹sup_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance inf_hom_class.to_order_hom_class [semilattice_inf α] [semilattice_inf β]
[inf_hom_class F α β] : order_hom_class F α β :=
{ map_rel := λ f a b h, by rw [←inf_eq_left, ←map_inf, inf_eq_left.2 h]
..‹inf_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance sup_bot_hom_class.to_bot_hom_class [has_sup α] [has_sup β] [has_bot α] [has_bot β]
[sup_bot_hom_class F α β] :
bot_hom_class F α β :=
{ .. ‹sup_bot_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance inf_top_hom_class.to_top_hom_class [has_inf α] [has_inf β] [has_top α] [has_top β]
[inf_top_hom_class F α β] :
top_hom_class F α β :=
{ .. ‹inf_top_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance lattice_hom_class.to_inf_hom_class [lattice α] [lattice β] [lattice_hom_class F α β] :
inf_hom_class F α β :=
{ .. ‹lattice_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance bounded_lattice_hom_class.to_sup_bot_hom_class [lattice α] [lattice β]
[bounded_order α] [bounded_order β] [bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β] :
sup_bot_hom_class F α β :=
{ .. ‹bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance bounded_lattice_hom_class.to_inf_top_hom_class [lattice α] [lattice β]
[bounded_order α] [bounded_order β] [bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β] :
inf_top_hom_class F α β :=
{ .. ‹bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance bounded_lattice_hom_class.to_bounded_order_hom_class [lattice α] [lattice β]
[bounded_order α] [bounded_order β] [bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β] :
bounded_order_hom_class F α β :=
{ .. show order_hom_class F α β, from infer_instance,
.. ‹bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β› }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance order_iso_class.to_sup_hom_class [semilattice_sup α] [semilattice_sup β]
[order_iso_class F α β] :
sup_hom_class F α β :=
{ map_sup := λ f a b, eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, by simp only [←le_map_inv_iff, sup_le_iff],
.. show order_hom_class F α β, from infer_instance }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance order_iso_class.to_inf_hom_class [semilattice_inf α] [semilattice_inf β]
[order_iso_class F α β] :
inf_hom_class F α β :=
{ map_inf := λ f a b, eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c, by simp only [←map_inv_le_iff, le_inf_iff],
.. show order_hom_class F α β, from infer_instance }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance order_iso_class.to_sup_bot_hom_class [semilattice_sup α] [order_bot α] [semilattice_sup β]
[order_bot β] [order_iso_class F α β] :
sup_bot_hom_class F α β :=
{ ..order_iso_class.to_sup_hom_class, ..order_iso_class.to_bot_hom_class }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance order_iso_class.to_inf_top_hom_class [semilattice_inf α] [order_top α] [semilattice_inf β]
[order_top β] [order_iso_class F α β] :
inf_top_hom_class F α β :=
{ ..order_iso_class.to_inf_hom_class, ..order_iso_class.to_top_hom_class }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance order_iso_class.to_lattice_hom_class [lattice α] [lattice β] [order_iso_class F α β] :
lattice_hom_class F α β :=
{ ..order_iso_class.to_sup_hom_class, ..order_iso_class.to_inf_hom_class }
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance order_iso_class.to_bounded_lattice_hom_class [lattice α] [lattice β] [bounded_order α]
[bounded_order β] [order_iso_class F α β] :
bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β :=
{ ..order_iso_class.to_lattice_hom_class, ..order_iso_class.to_bounded_order_hom_class }
@[simp] lemma map_finset_sup [semilattice_sup α] [order_bot α] [semilattice_sup β] [order_bot β]
[sup_bot_hom_class F α β] (f : F) (s : finset ι) (g : ι → α) :
f (s.sup g) = s.sup (f ∘ g) :=
finset.cons_induction_on s (map_bot f) $ λ i s _ h,
by rw [finset.sup_cons, finset.sup_cons, map_sup, h]
@[simp] lemma map_finset_inf [semilattice_inf α] [order_top α] [semilattice_inf β] [order_top β]
[inf_top_hom_class F α β] (f : F) (s : finset ι) (g : ι → α) :
f (s.inf g) = s.inf (f ∘ g) :=
finset.cons_induction_on s (map_top f) $ λ i s _ h,
by rw [finset.inf_cons, finset.inf_cons, map_inf, h]
section bounded_lattice
variables [lattice α] [bounded_order α] [lattice β] [bounded_order β]
[bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β] (f : F) {a b : α}
include β
lemma disjoint.map (h : disjoint a b) : disjoint (f a) (f b) :=
by rw [disjoint_iff, ←map_inf, h.eq_bot, map_bot]
lemma codisjoint.map (h : codisjoint a b) : codisjoint (f a) (f b) :=
by rw [codisjoint_iff, ←map_sup, h.eq_top, map_top]
lemma is_compl.map (h : is_compl a b) : is_compl (f a) (f b) := ⟨h.1.map _, h.2.map _⟩
end bounded_lattice
section boolean_algebra
variables [boolean_algebra α] [boolean_algebra β] [bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β] (f : F)
include β
/-- Special case of `map_compl` for boolean algebras. -/
lemma map_compl' (a : α) : f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ := (is_compl_compl.map _).compl_eq.symm
/-- Special case of `map_sdiff` for boolean algebras. -/
lemma map_sdiff' (a b : α) : f (a \ b) = f a \ f b :=
by rw [sdiff_eq, sdiff_eq, map_inf, map_compl']
/-- Special case of `map_symm_diff` for boolean algebras. -/
lemma map_symm_diff' (a b : α) : f (a ∆ b) = f a ∆ f b :=
by rw [symm_diff, symm_diff, map_sup, map_sdiff', map_sdiff']
end boolean_algebra
instance [has_sup α] [has_sup β] [sup_hom_class F α β] : has_coe_t F (sup_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f, map_sup f⟩⟩
instance [has_inf α] [has_inf β] [inf_hom_class F α β] : has_coe_t F (inf_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f, map_inf f⟩⟩
instance [has_sup α] [has_sup β] [has_bot α] [has_bot β] [sup_bot_hom_class F α β] :
has_coe_t F (sup_bot_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f, map_bot f⟩⟩
instance [has_inf α] [has_inf β] [has_top α] [has_top β] [inf_top_hom_class F α β] :
has_coe_t F (inf_top_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f, map_top f⟩⟩
instance [lattice α] [lattice β] [lattice_hom_class F α β] : has_coe_t F (lattice_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f, { to_fun := f, map_sup' := map_sup f, map_inf' := map_inf f }⟩
instance [lattice α] [lattice β] [bounded_order α] [bounded_order β]
[bounded_lattice_hom_class F α β] : has_coe_t F (bounded_lattice_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f, { to_fun := f, map_top' := map_top f, map_bot' := map_bot f, ..(f : lattice_hom α β) }⟩
/-! ### Supremum homomorphisms -/
namespace sup_hom
variables [has_sup α]
section has_sup
variables [has_sup β] [has_sup γ] [has_sup δ]
instance : sup_hom_class (sup_hom α β) α β :=
{ coe := sup_hom.to_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h, by cases f; cases g; congr',
map_sup := sup_hom.map_sup' }
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply `fun_like.has_coe_to_fun`
directly. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (sup_hom α β) (λ _, α → β) := ⟨λ f, f.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe {f : sup_hom α β} : f.to_fun = (f : α → β) := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : sup_hom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := fun_like.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `sup_hom` with a new `to_fun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : sup_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : sup_hom α β :=
{ to_fun := f',
map_sup' := h.symm ▸ f.map_sup' }
@[simp] lemma coe_copy (f : sup_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' := rfl
lemma copy_eq (f : sup_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f := fun_like.ext' h
variables (α)
/-- `id` as a `sup_hom`. -/
protected def id : sup_hom α α := ⟨id, λ a b, rfl⟩
instance : inhabited (sup_hom α α) := ⟨sup_hom.id α⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(sup_hom.id α) = id := rfl
variables {α}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (a : α) : sup_hom.id α a = a := rfl
/-- Composition of `sup_hom`s as a `sup_hom`. -/
def comp (f : sup_hom β γ) (g : sup_hom α β) : sup_hom α γ :=
{ to_fun := f ∘ g,
map_sup' := λ a b, by rw [comp_apply, map_sup, map_sup] }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : sup_hom β γ) (g : sup_hom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : sup_hom β γ) (g : sup_hom α β) (a : α) :
(f.comp g) a = f (g a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_assoc (f : sup_hom γ δ) (g : sup_hom β γ) (h : sup_hom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : sup_hom α β) : f.comp (sup_hom.id α) = f := sup_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : sup_hom α β) : (sup_hom.id β).comp f = f := sup_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
lemma cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : sup_hom β γ} {f : sup_hom α β} (hf : surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, sup_hom.ext $ hf.forall.2 $ fun_like.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg _⟩
lemma cancel_left {g : sup_hom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : sup_hom α β} (hg : injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, sup_hom.ext $ λ a, hg $
by rw [←sup_hom.comp_apply, h, sup_hom.comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end has_sup
variables (α) [semilattice_sup β]
/-- The constant function as a `sup_hom`. -/
def const (b : β) : sup_hom α β := ⟨λ _, b, λ _ _, sup_idem.symm⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = function.const α b := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_apply (b : β) (a : α) : const α b a = b := rfl
variables {α}
instance : has_sup (sup_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨f ⊔ g, λ a b, by { rw [pi.sup_apply, map_sup, map_sup], exact sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _ }⟩⟩
instance : semilattice_sup (sup_hom α β) := fun_like.coe_injective.semilattice_sup _ $ λ f g, rfl
instance [has_bot β] : has_bot (sup_hom α β) := ⟨sup_hom.const α ⊥⟩
instance [has_top β] : has_top (sup_hom α β) := ⟨sup_hom.const α ⊤⟩
instance [order_bot β] : order_bot (sup_hom α β) :=
order_bot.lift (coe_fn : _ → α → β) (λ _ _, id) rfl
instance [order_top β] : order_top (sup_hom α β) :=
order_top.lift (coe_fn : _ → α → β) (λ _ _, id) rfl
instance [bounded_order β] : bounded_order (sup_hom α β) :=
bounded_order.lift (coe_fn : _ → α → β) (λ _ _, id) rfl rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_sup (f g : sup_hom α β) : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = f ⊔ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_bot [has_bot β] : ⇑(⊥ : sup_hom α β) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_top [has_top β] : ⇑(⊤ : sup_hom α β) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_apply (f g : sup_hom α β) (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_apply [has_bot β] (a : α) : (⊥ : sup_hom α β) a = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_apply [has_top β] (a : α) : (⊤ : sup_hom α β) a = ⊤ := rfl
end sup_hom
/-! ### Infimum homomorphisms -/
namespace inf_hom
variables [has_inf α]
section has_inf
variables [has_inf β] [has_inf γ] [has_inf δ]
instance : inf_hom_class (inf_hom α β) α β :=
{ coe := inf_hom.to_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h, by cases f; cases g; congr',
map_inf := inf_hom.map_inf' }
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply `fun_like.has_coe_to_fun`
directly. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (inf_hom α β) (λ _, α → β) := ⟨λ f, f.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe {f : inf_hom α β} : f.to_fun = (f : α → β) := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : inf_hom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := fun_like.ext f g h
/-- Copy of an `inf_hom` with a new `to_fun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : inf_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : inf_hom α β :=
{ to_fun := f',
map_inf' := h.symm ▸ f.map_inf' }
@[simp] lemma coe_copy (f : inf_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' := rfl
lemma copy_eq (f : inf_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f := fun_like.ext' h
variables (α)
/-- `id` as an `inf_hom`. -/
protected def id : inf_hom α α := ⟨id, λ a b, rfl⟩
instance : inhabited (inf_hom α α) := ⟨inf_hom.id α⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(inf_hom.id α) = id := rfl
variables {α}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (a : α) : inf_hom.id α a = a := rfl
/-- Composition of `inf_hom`s as an `inf_hom`. -/
def comp (f : inf_hom β γ) (g : inf_hom α β) : inf_hom α γ :=
{ to_fun := f ∘ g,
map_inf' := λ a b, by rw [comp_apply, map_inf, map_inf] }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : inf_hom β γ) (g : inf_hom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : inf_hom β γ) (g : inf_hom α β) (a : α) :
(f.comp g) a = f (g a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_assoc (f : inf_hom γ δ) (g : inf_hom β γ) (h : inf_hom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : inf_hom α β) : f.comp (inf_hom.id α) = f := inf_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : inf_hom α β) : (inf_hom.id β).comp f = f := inf_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
lemma cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : inf_hom β γ} {f : inf_hom α β} (hf : surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, inf_hom.ext $ hf.forall.2 $ fun_like.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg _⟩
lemma cancel_left {g : inf_hom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : inf_hom α β} (hg : injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, inf_hom.ext $ λ a, hg $
by rw [←inf_hom.comp_apply, h, inf_hom.comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end has_inf
variables (α) [semilattice_inf β]
/-- The constant function as an `inf_hom`. -/
def const (b : β) : inf_hom α β := ⟨λ _, b, λ _ _, inf_idem.symm⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = function.const α b := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_apply (b : β) (a : α) : const α b a = b := rfl
variables {α}
instance : has_inf (inf_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨f ⊓ g, λ a b, by { rw [pi.inf_apply, map_inf, map_inf], exact inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _ }⟩⟩
instance : semilattice_inf (inf_hom α β) := fun_like.coe_injective.semilattice_inf _ $ λ f g, rfl
instance [has_bot β] : has_bot (inf_hom α β) := ⟨inf_hom.const α ⊥⟩
instance [has_top β] : has_top (inf_hom α β) := ⟨inf_hom.const α ⊤⟩
instance [order_bot β] : order_bot (inf_hom α β) :=
order_bot.lift (coe_fn : _ → α → β) (λ _ _, id) rfl
instance [order_top β] : order_top (inf_hom α β) :=
order_top.lift (coe_fn : _ → α → β) (λ _ _, id) rfl
instance [bounded_order β] : bounded_order (inf_hom α β) :=
bounded_order.lift (coe_fn : _ → α → β) (λ _ _, id) rfl rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_inf (f g : inf_hom α β) : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = f ⊓ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_bot [has_bot β] : ⇑(⊥ : inf_hom α β) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_top [has_top β] : ⇑(⊤ : inf_hom α β) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_apply (f g : inf_hom α β) (a : α) : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_apply [has_bot β] (a : α) : (⊥ : inf_hom α β) a = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_apply [has_top β] (a : α) : (⊤ : inf_hom α β) a = ⊤ := rfl
end inf_hom
/-! ### Finitary supremum homomorphisms -/
namespace sup_bot_hom
variables [has_sup α] [has_bot α]
section has_sup
variables [has_sup β] [has_bot β] [has_sup γ] [has_bot γ] [has_sup δ] [has_bot δ]
/-- Reinterpret a `sup_bot_hom` as a `bot_hom`. -/
def to_bot_hom (f : sup_bot_hom α β) : bot_hom α β := { ..f }
instance : sup_bot_hom_class (sup_bot_hom α β) α β :=
{ coe := λ f, f.to_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h, by { obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f, obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g, congr' },
map_sup := λ f, f.map_sup',
map_bot := λ f, f.map_bot' }
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply `fun_like.has_coe_to_fun`
directly. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (sup_bot_hom α β) (λ _, α → β) := fun_like.has_coe_to_fun
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe {f : sup_bot_hom α β} : f.to_fun = (f : α → β) := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : sup_bot_hom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := fun_like.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `sup_bot_hom` with a new `to_fun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : sup_bot_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : sup_bot_hom α β :=
{ to_sup_hom := f.to_sup_hom.copy f' h, ..f.to_bot_hom.copy f' h }
@[simp] lemma coe_copy (f : sup_bot_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' := rfl
lemma copy_eq (f : sup_bot_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f := fun_like.ext' h
variables (α)
/-- `id` as a `sup_bot_hom`. -/
@[simps] protected def id : sup_bot_hom α α := ⟨sup_hom.id α, rfl⟩
instance : inhabited (sup_bot_hom α α) := ⟨sup_bot_hom.id α⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(sup_bot_hom.id α) = id := rfl
variables {α}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (a : α) : sup_bot_hom.id α a = a := rfl
/-- Composition of `sup_bot_hom`s as a `sup_bot_hom`. -/
def comp (f : sup_bot_hom β γ) (g : sup_bot_hom α β) : sup_bot_hom α γ :=
{ ..f.to_sup_hom.comp g.to_sup_hom, ..f.to_bot_hom.comp g.to_bot_hom }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : sup_bot_hom β γ) (g : sup_bot_hom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : sup_bot_hom β γ) (g : sup_bot_hom α β) (a : α) :
(f.comp g) a = f (g a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_assoc (f : sup_bot_hom γ δ) (g : sup_bot_hom β γ) (h : sup_bot_hom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : sup_bot_hom α β) : f.comp (sup_bot_hom.id α) = f := ext $ λ a, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : sup_bot_hom α β) : (sup_bot_hom.id β).comp f = f := ext $ λ a, rfl
lemma cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : sup_bot_hom β γ} {f : sup_bot_hom α β} (hf : surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, ext $ hf.forall.2 $ fun_like.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg _⟩
lemma cancel_left {g : sup_bot_hom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : sup_bot_hom α β} (hg : injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, sup_bot_hom.ext $ λ a, hg $
by rw [←comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end has_sup
variables [semilattice_sup β] [order_bot β]
instance : has_sup (sup_bot_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f g, { to_sup_hom := f.to_sup_hom ⊔ g.to_sup_hom, ..f.to_bot_hom ⊔ g.to_bot_hom }⟩
instance : semilattice_sup (sup_bot_hom α β) :=
fun_like.coe_injective.semilattice_sup _ $ λ f g, rfl
instance : order_bot (sup_bot_hom α β) := { bot := ⟨⊥, rfl⟩, bot_le := λ f, bot_le }
@[simp] lemma coe_sup (f g : sup_bot_hom α β) : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = f ⊔ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : sup_bot_hom α β) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_apply (f g : sup_bot_hom α β) (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_apply (a : α) : (⊥ : sup_bot_hom α β) a = ⊥ := rfl
end sup_bot_hom
/-! ### Finitary infimum homomorphisms -/
namespace inf_top_hom
variables [has_inf α] [has_top α]
section has_inf
variables [has_inf β] [has_top β] [has_inf γ] [has_top γ] [has_inf δ] [has_top δ]
/-- Reinterpret an `inf_top_hom` as a `top_hom`. -/
def to_top_hom (f : inf_top_hom α β) : top_hom α β := { ..f }
instance : inf_top_hom_class (inf_top_hom α β) α β :=
{ coe := λ f, f.to_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h, by { obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f, obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g, congr' },
map_inf := λ f, f.map_inf',
map_top := λ f, f.map_top' }
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply `fun_like.has_coe_to_fun`
directly. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (inf_top_hom α β) (λ _, α → β) := fun_like.has_coe_to_fun
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe {f : inf_top_hom α β} : f.to_fun = (f : α → β) := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : inf_top_hom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := fun_like.ext f g h
/-- Copy of an `inf_top_hom` with a new `to_fun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : inf_top_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : inf_top_hom α β :=
{ to_inf_hom := f.to_inf_hom.copy f' h, ..f.to_top_hom.copy f' h }
@[simp] lemma coe_copy (f : inf_top_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' := rfl
lemma copy_eq (f : inf_top_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f := fun_like.ext' h
variables (α)
/-- `id` as an `inf_top_hom`. -/
@[simps] protected def id : inf_top_hom α α := ⟨inf_hom.id α, rfl⟩
instance : inhabited (inf_top_hom α α) := ⟨inf_top_hom.id α⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(inf_top_hom.id α) = id := rfl
variables {α}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (a : α) : inf_top_hom.id α a = a := rfl
/-- Composition of `inf_top_hom`s as an `inf_top_hom`. -/
def comp (f : inf_top_hom β γ) (g : inf_top_hom α β) : inf_top_hom α γ :=
{ ..f.to_inf_hom.comp g.to_inf_hom, ..f.to_top_hom.comp g.to_top_hom }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : inf_top_hom β γ) (g : inf_top_hom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : inf_top_hom β γ) (g : inf_top_hom α β) (a : α) :
(f.comp g) a = f (g a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_assoc (f : inf_top_hom γ δ) (g : inf_top_hom β γ) (h : inf_top_hom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : inf_top_hom α β) : f.comp (inf_top_hom.id α) = f := ext $ λ a, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : inf_top_hom α β) : (inf_top_hom.id β).comp f = f := ext $ λ a, rfl
lemma cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : inf_top_hom β γ} {f : inf_top_hom α β} (hf : surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, ext $ hf.forall.2 $ fun_like.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg _⟩
lemma cancel_left {g : inf_top_hom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : inf_top_hom α β} (hg : injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, inf_top_hom.ext $ λ a, hg $
by rw [←comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end has_inf
variables [semilattice_inf β] [order_top β]
instance : has_inf (inf_top_hom α β) :=
⟨λ f g, { to_inf_hom := f.to_inf_hom ⊓ g.to_inf_hom, ..f.to_top_hom ⊓ g.to_top_hom }⟩
instance : semilattice_inf (inf_top_hom α β) :=
fun_like.coe_injective.semilattice_inf _ $ λ f g, rfl
instance : order_top (inf_top_hom α β) := { top := ⟨⊤, rfl⟩, le_top := λ f, le_top }
@[simp] lemma coe_inf (f g : inf_top_hom α β) : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = f ⊓ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_top : ⇑(⊤ : inf_top_hom α β) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_apply (f g : inf_top_hom α β) (a : α) : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_apply (a : α) : (⊤ : inf_top_hom α β) a = ⊤ := rfl
end inf_top_hom
/-! ### Lattice homomorphisms -/
namespace lattice_hom
variables [lattice α] [lattice β] [lattice γ] [lattice δ]
/-- Reinterpret a `lattice_hom` as an `inf_hom`. -/
def to_inf_hom (f : lattice_hom α β) : inf_hom α β := { ..f }
instance : lattice_hom_class (lattice_hom α β) α β :=
{ coe := λ f, f.to_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h, by obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f; obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g; congr',
map_sup := λ f, f.map_sup',
map_inf := λ f, f.map_inf' }
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply `fun_like.has_coe_to_fun`
directly. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (lattice_hom α β) (λ _, α → β) := ⟨λ f, f.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe {f : lattice_hom α β} : f.to_fun = (f : α → β) := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : lattice_hom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := fun_like.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `lattice_hom` with a new `to_fun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : lattice_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : lattice_hom α β :=
{ .. f.to_sup_hom.copy f' h, .. f.to_inf_hom.copy f' h }
@[simp] lemma coe_copy (f : lattice_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' := rfl
lemma copy_eq (f : lattice_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f := fun_like.ext' h
variables (α)
/-- `id` as a `lattice_hom`. -/
protected def id : lattice_hom α α :=
{ to_fun := id,
map_sup' := λ _ _, rfl,
map_inf' := λ _ _, rfl }
instance : inhabited (lattice_hom α α) := ⟨lattice_hom.id α⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(lattice_hom.id α) = id := rfl
variables {α}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (a : α) : lattice_hom.id α a = a := rfl
/-- Composition of `lattice_hom`s as a `lattice_hom`. -/
def comp (f : lattice_hom β γ) (g : lattice_hom α β) : lattice_hom α γ :=
{ ..f.to_sup_hom.comp g.to_sup_hom, ..f.to_inf_hom.comp g.to_inf_hom }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : lattice_hom β γ) (g : lattice_hom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : lattice_hom β γ) (g : lattice_hom α β) (a : α) :
(f.comp g) a = f (g a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp_sup_hom (f : lattice_hom β γ) (g : lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g : sup_hom α γ) = (f : sup_hom β γ).comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp_inf_hom (f : lattice_hom β γ) (g : lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g : inf_hom α γ) = (f : inf_hom β γ).comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_assoc (f : lattice_hom γ δ) (g : lattice_hom β γ) (h : lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : lattice_hom α β) : f.comp (lattice_hom.id α) = f :=
lattice_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : lattice_hom α β) : (lattice_hom.id β).comp f = f :=
lattice_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
lemma cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : lattice_hom β γ} {f : lattice_hom α β} (hf : surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, lattice_hom.ext $ hf.forall.2 $ fun_like.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg _⟩
lemma cancel_left {g : lattice_hom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : lattice_hom α β} (hg : injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, lattice_hom.ext $ λ a, hg $
by rw [←lattice_hom.comp_apply, h, lattice_hom.comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end lattice_hom
namespace order_hom_class
variables (α β) [linear_order α] [lattice β] [order_hom_class F α β]
/-- An order homomorphism from a linear order is a lattice homomorphism. -/
@[reducible] def to_lattice_hom_class : lattice_hom_class F α β :=
{ map_sup := λ f a b, begin
obtain h | h := le_total a b,
{ rw [sup_eq_right.2 h, sup_eq_right.2 (order_hom_class.mono f h : f a ≤ f b)] },
{ rw [sup_eq_left.2 h, sup_eq_left.2 (order_hom_class.mono f h : f b ≤ f a)] }
end,
map_inf := λ f a b, begin
obtain h | h := le_total a b,
{ rw [inf_eq_left.2 h, inf_eq_left.2 (order_hom_class.mono f h : f a ≤ f b)] },
{ rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_eq_right.2 (order_hom_class.mono f h : f b ≤ f a)] }
end,
.. ‹order_hom_class F α β› }
/-- Reinterpret an order homomorphism to a linear order as a `lattice_hom`. -/
def to_lattice_hom (f : F) : lattice_hom α β :=
by { haveI : lattice_hom_class F α β := order_hom_class.to_lattice_hom_class α β, exact f }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_lattice_hom (f : F) : ⇑(to_lattice_hom α β f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_lattice_hom_apply (f : F) (a : α) : to_lattice_hom α β f a = f a := rfl
end order_hom_class
/-! ### Bounded lattice homomorphisms -/
namespace bounded_lattice_hom
variables [lattice α] [lattice β] [lattice γ] [lattice δ] [bounded_order α] [bounded_order β]
[bounded_order γ] [bounded_order δ]
/-- Reinterpret a `bounded_lattice_hom` as a `sup_bot_hom`. -/
def to_sup_bot_hom (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) : sup_bot_hom α β := { ..f }
/-- Reinterpret a `bounded_lattice_hom` as an `inf_top_hom`. -/
def to_inf_top_hom (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) : inf_top_hom α β := { ..f }
/-- Reinterpret a `bounded_lattice_hom` as a `bounded_order_hom`. -/
def to_bounded_order_hom (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) : bounded_order_hom α β :=
{ ..f, ..(f.to_lattice_hom : α →o β) }
instance : bounded_lattice_hom_class (bounded_lattice_hom α β) α β :=
{ coe := λ f, f.to_fun,
coe_injective' := λ f g h, by obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := f; obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := g; congr',
map_sup := λ f, f.map_sup',
map_inf := λ f, f.map_inf',
map_top := λ f, f.map_top',
map_bot := λ f, f.map_bot' }
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply `fun_like.has_coe_to_fun`
directly. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (bounded_lattice_hom α β) (λ _, α → β) := ⟨λ f, f.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe {f : bounded_lattice_hom α β} : f.to_fun = (f : α → β) := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : bounded_lattice_hom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := fun_like.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `bounded_lattice_hom` with a new `to_fun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) :
bounded_lattice_hom α β :=
{ .. f.to_lattice_hom.copy f' h, .. f.to_bounded_order_hom.copy f' h }
@[simp] lemma coe_copy (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) :
⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
lemma copy_eq (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
fun_like.ext' h
variables (α)
/-- `id` as a `bounded_lattice_hom`. -/
protected def id : bounded_lattice_hom α α := { ..lattice_hom.id α, ..bounded_order_hom.id α }
instance : inhabited (bounded_lattice_hom α α) := ⟨bounded_lattice_hom.id α⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_id : ⇑(bounded_lattice_hom.id α) = id := rfl
variables {α}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (a : α) : bounded_lattice_hom.id α a = a := rfl
/-- Composition of `bounded_lattice_hom`s as a `bounded_lattice_hom`. -/
def comp (f : bounded_lattice_hom β γ) (g : bounded_lattice_hom α β) : bounded_lattice_hom α γ :=
{ ..f.to_lattice_hom.comp g.to_lattice_hom, ..f.to_bounded_order_hom.comp g.to_bounded_order_hom }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : bounded_lattice_hom β γ) (g : bounded_lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : bounded_lattice_hom β γ) (g : bounded_lattice_hom α β) (a : α) :
(f.comp g) a = f (g a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp_lattice_hom (f : bounded_lattice_hom β γ) (g : bounded_lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g : lattice_hom α γ) = (f : lattice_hom β γ).comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp_sup_hom (f : bounded_lattice_hom β γ) (g : bounded_lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g : sup_hom α γ) = (f : sup_hom β γ).comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp_inf_hom (f : bounded_lattice_hom β γ) (g : bounded_lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g : inf_hom α γ) = (f : inf_hom β γ).comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_assoc (f : bounded_lattice_hom γ δ) (g : bounded_lattice_hom β γ)
(h : bounded_lattice_hom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_id (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) : f.comp (bounded_lattice_hom.id α) = f :=
bounded_lattice_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
@[simp] lemma id_comp (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) : (bounded_lattice_hom.id β).comp f = f :=
bounded_lattice_hom.ext $ λ a, rfl
lemma cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : bounded_lattice_hom β γ} {f : bounded_lattice_hom α β}
(hf : surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, bounded_lattice_hom.ext $ hf.forall.2 $ fun_like.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg _⟩
lemma cancel_left {g : bounded_lattice_hom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : bounded_lattice_hom α β}
(hg : injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, ext $ λ a, hg $ by rw [←comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end bounded_lattice_hom
/-! ### Dual homs -/
namespace sup_hom
variables [has_sup α] [has_sup β] [has_sup γ]
/-- Reinterpret a supremum homomorphism as an infimum homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps] protected def dual : sup_hom α β ≃ inf_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨f, f.map_sup'⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, ⟨f, f.map_inf'⟩,
left_inv := λ f, sup_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl,
right_inv := λ f, inf_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl }
@[simp] lemma dual_id : (sup_hom.id α).dual = inf_hom.id _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_comp (g : sup_hom β γ) (f : sup_hom α β) :
(g.comp f).dual = g.dual.comp f.dual := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_id : sup_hom.dual.symm (inf_hom.id _) = sup_hom.id α := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_comp (g : inf_hom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : inf_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
sup_hom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (sup_hom.dual.symm g).comp (sup_hom.dual.symm f) := rfl
end sup_hom
namespace inf_hom
variables [has_inf α] [has_inf β] [has_inf γ]
/-- Reinterpret an infimum homomorphism as a supremum homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps] protected def dual : inf_hom α β ≃ sup_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨f, f.map_inf'⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, ⟨f, f.map_sup'⟩,
left_inv := λ f, inf_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl,
right_inv := λ f, sup_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl }
@[simp] lemma dual_id : (inf_hom.id α).dual = sup_hom.id _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_comp (g : inf_hom β γ) (f : inf_hom α β) :
(g.comp f).dual = g.dual.comp f.dual := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_id : inf_hom.dual.symm (sup_hom.id _) = inf_hom.id α := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_comp (g : sup_hom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : sup_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
inf_hom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (inf_hom.dual.symm g).comp (inf_hom.dual.symm f) := rfl
end inf_hom
namespace sup_bot_hom
variables [has_sup α] [has_bot α] [has_sup β] [has_bot β] [has_sup γ] [has_bot γ]
/-- Reinterpret a finitary supremum homomorphism as a finitary infimum homomorphism between the dual
lattices. -/
def dual : sup_bot_hom α β ≃ inf_top_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨f.to_sup_hom.dual, f.map_bot'⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, ⟨sup_hom.dual.symm f.to_inf_hom, f.map_top'⟩,
left_inv := λ f, sup_bot_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl,
right_inv := λ f, inf_top_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl }
@[simp] lemma dual_id : (sup_bot_hom.id α).dual = inf_top_hom.id _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_comp (g : sup_bot_hom β γ) (f : sup_bot_hom α β) :
(g.comp f).dual = g.dual.comp f.dual := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_id : sup_bot_hom.dual.symm (inf_top_hom.id _) = sup_bot_hom.id α := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_comp (g : inf_top_hom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : inf_top_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
sup_bot_hom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (sup_bot_hom.dual.symm g).comp (sup_bot_hom.dual.symm f) := rfl
end sup_bot_hom
namespace inf_top_hom
variables [has_inf α] [has_top α] [has_inf β] [has_top β] [has_inf γ] [has_top γ]
/-- Reinterpret a finitary infimum homomorphism as a finitary supremum homomorphism between the dual
lattices. -/
@[simps] protected def dual : inf_top_hom α β ≃ sup_bot_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨f.to_inf_hom.dual, f.map_top'⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, ⟨inf_hom.dual.symm f.to_sup_hom, f.map_bot'⟩,
left_inv := λ f, inf_top_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl,
right_inv := λ f, sup_bot_hom.ext $ λ _, rfl }
@[simp] lemma dual_id : (inf_top_hom.id α).dual = sup_bot_hom.id _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_comp (g : inf_top_hom β γ) (f : inf_top_hom α β) :
(g.comp f).dual = g.dual.comp f.dual := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_id : inf_top_hom.dual.symm (sup_bot_hom.id _) = inf_top_hom.id α := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_comp (g : sup_bot_hom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : sup_bot_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
inf_top_hom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (inf_top_hom.dual.symm g).comp (inf_top_hom.dual.symm f) := rfl
end inf_top_hom
namespace lattice_hom
variables [lattice α] [lattice β] [lattice γ]
/-- Reinterpret a lattice homomorphism as a lattice homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps] protected def dual : lattice_hom α β ≃ lattice_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨f.to_inf_hom.dual, f.map_sup'⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, ⟨f.to_inf_hom.dual, f.map_sup'⟩,
left_inv := λ f, ext $ λ a, rfl,
right_inv := λ f, ext $ λ a, rfl }
@[simp] lemma dual_id : (lattice_hom.id α).dual = lattice_hom.id _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_comp (g : lattice_hom β γ) (f : lattice_hom α β) :
(g.comp f).dual = g.dual.comp f.dual := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_id : lattice_hom.dual.symm (lattice_hom.id _) = lattice_hom.id α := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_comp (g : lattice_hom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : lattice_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
lattice_hom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (lattice_hom.dual.symm g).comp (lattice_hom.dual.symm f) := rfl
end lattice_hom
namespace bounded_lattice_hom
variables [lattice α] [bounded_order α] [lattice β] [bounded_order β] [lattice γ] [bounded_order γ]
/-- Reinterpret a bounded lattice homomorphism as a bounded lattice homomorphism between the dual
bounded lattices. -/
@[simps] protected def dual : bounded_lattice_hom α β ≃ bounded_lattice_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨f.to_lattice_hom.dual, f.map_bot', f.map_top'⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, ⟨lattice_hom.dual.symm f.to_lattice_hom, f.map_bot', f.map_top'⟩,
left_inv := λ f, ext $ λ a, rfl,
right_inv := λ f, ext $ λ a, rfl }
@[simp] lemma dual_id : (bounded_lattice_hom.id α).dual = bounded_lattice_hom.id _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma dual_comp (g : bounded_lattice_hom β γ) (f : bounded_lattice_hom α β) :
(g.comp f).dual = g.dual.comp f.dual := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_id :
bounded_lattice_hom.dual.symm (bounded_lattice_hom.id _) = bounded_lattice_hom.id α := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_dual_comp (g : bounded_lattice_hom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : bounded_lattice_hom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
bounded_lattice_hom.dual.symm (g.comp f) =
(bounded_lattice_hom.dual.symm g).comp (bounded_lattice_hom.dual.symm f) := rfl
end bounded_lattice_hom
|
73042d04a45a68f821f599d92c152bd829ae7801 | 7565ffb53cc64430691ce89265da0f944ee43051 | /hott/homotopy/freudenthal.hlean | 07329ef14e11449e90d95c11aedfa43c1775ccdd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | EgbertRijke/lean2 | cacddba3d150f8b38688e044960a208bf851f90e | 519dcee739fbca5a4ab77d66db7652097b4604cd | refs/heads/master | 1,606,936,954,854 | 1,498,836,083,000 | 1,498,910,882,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,702 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
The Freudenthal Suspension Theorem
-/
import homotopy.wedge homotopy.circle
open eq is_conn is_trunc pointed susp nat pi equiv is_equiv trunc fiber trunc_index
namespace freudenthal section
parameters {A : Type*} {n : ℕ} [is_conn n A]
/-
This proof is ported from Agda
This is the 95% version of the Freudenthal Suspension Theorem, which means that we don't
prove that loop_psusp_unit : A →* Ω(psusp A) is 2n-connected (if A is n-connected),
but instead we only prove that it induces an equivalence on the first 2n homotopy groups.
-/
private definition up (a : A) : north = north :> susp A :=
loop_psusp_unit A a
definition code_merid : A → ptrunc (n + n) A → ptrunc (n + n) A :=
begin
have is_conn n (ptrunc (n + n) A), from !is_conn_trunc,
refine @wedge_extension.ext _ _ n n _ _ (λ x y, ttrunc (n + n) A) _ _ _ _,
{ intros, apply is_trunc_trunc}, -- this subgoal might become unnecessary if
-- type class inference catches it
{ exact tr},
{ exact id},
{ reflexivity}
end
definition code_merid_β_left (a : A) : code_merid a pt = tr a :=
by apply wedge_extension.β_left
definition code_merid_β_right (b : ptrunc (n + n) A) : code_merid pt b = b :=
by apply wedge_extension.β_right
definition code_merid_coh : code_merid_β_left pt = code_merid_β_right pt :=
begin
symmetry, apply eq_of_inv_con_eq_idp, apply wedge_extension.coh
end
definition is_equiv_code_merid (a : A) : is_equiv (code_merid a) :=
begin
have Πa, is_trunc n.-2.+1 (is_equiv (code_merid a)),
from λa, is_trunc_of_le _ !minus_one_le_succ,
refine is_conn.elim (n.-1) _ _ a,
{ esimp, exact homotopy_closed id (homotopy.symm (code_merid_β_right))}
end
definition code_merid_equiv [constructor] (a : A) : trunc (n + n) A ≃ trunc (n + n) A :=
equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_code_merid a)
definition code_merid_inv_pt (x : trunc (n + n) A) : (code_merid_equiv pt)⁻¹ x = x :=
begin
refine ap010 @(is_equiv.inv _) _ x ⬝ _,
{ exact homotopy_closed id (homotopy.symm code_merid_β_right)},
{ apply is_conn.elim_β},
{ reflexivity}
end
definition code [unfold 4] : susp A → Type :=
susp.elim_type (trunc (n + n) A) (trunc (n + n) A) code_merid_equiv
definition is_trunc_code (x : susp A) : is_trunc (n + n) (code x) :=
begin
induction x with a: esimp,
{ exact _},
{ exact _},
{ apply is_prop.elimo}
end
local attribute is_trunc_code [instance]
definition decode_north [unfold 4] : code north → trunc (n + n) (north = north :> susp A) :=
trunc_functor (n + n) up
definition decode_north_pt : decode_north (tr pt) = tr idp :=
ap tr !con.right_inv
definition decode_south [unfold 4] : code south → trunc (n + n) (north = south :> susp A) :=
trunc_functor (n + n) merid
definition encode' {x : susp A} (p : north = x) : code x :=
transport code p (tr pt)
definition encode [unfold 5] {x : susp A} (p : trunc (n + n) (north = x)) : code x :=
begin
induction p with p,
exact transport code p (tr pt)
end
theorem encode_decode_north (c : code north) : encode (decode_north c) = c :=
begin
have H : Πc, is_trunc (n + n) (encode (decode_north c) = c), from _,
esimp at *,
induction c with a,
rewrite [↑[encode, decode_north, up, code], con_tr, elim_type_merid, ▸*,
code_merid_β_left, elim_type_merid_inv, ▸*, code_merid_inv_pt]
end
definition decode_coh_f (a : A) : tr (up pt) =[merid a] decode_south (code_merid a (tr pt)) :=
begin
refine _ ⬝op ap decode_south (code_merid_β_left a)⁻¹,
apply trunc_pathover,
apply eq_pathover_constant_left_id_right,
apply square_of_eq,
exact whisker_right (merid a) !con.right_inv
end
definition decode_coh_g (a' : A) : tr (up a') =[merid pt] decode_south (code_merid pt (tr a')) :=
begin
refine _ ⬝op ap decode_south (code_merid_β_right (tr a'))⁻¹,
apply trunc_pathover,
apply eq_pathover_constant_left_id_right,
apply square_of_eq, refine !inv_con_cancel_right ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹
end
definition decode_coh_lem {A : Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a')
: whisker_right p (con.right_inv p) = inv_con_cancel_right p p ⬝ (idp_con p)⁻¹ :=
by induction p; reflexivity
theorem decode_coh (a : A) : decode_north =[merid a] decode_south :=
begin
apply arrow_pathover_left, intro c, esimp at *,
induction c with a',
rewrite [↑code, elim_type_merid],
refine @wedge_extension.ext _ _ n n _ _ (λ a a', tr (up a') =[merid a] decode_south
(to_fun (code_merid_equiv a) (tr a'))) _ _ _ _ a a',
{ intros, apply is_trunc_pathover, apply is_trunc_succ, apply is_trunc_trunc},
{ exact decode_coh_f},
{ exact decode_coh_g},
{ clear a a', unfold [decode_coh_f, decode_coh_g], refine ap011 concato_eq _ _,
{ refine ap (λp, trunc_pathover (eq_pathover_constant_left_id_right (square_of_eq p))) _,
apply decode_coh_lem},
{ apply ap (λp, ap decode_south p⁻¹), apply code_merid_coh}}
end
definition decode [unfold 4] {x : susp A} (c : code x) : trunc (n + n) (north = x) :=
begin
induction x with a,
{ exact decode_north c},
{ exact decode_south c},
{ exact decode_coh a}
end
theorem decode_encode {x : susp A} (p : trunc (n + n) (north = x)) : decode (encode p) = p :=
begin
induction p with p, induction p, esimp, apply decode_north_pt
end
parameters (A n)
definition equiv' : trunc (n + n) A ≃ trunc (n + n) (Ω (psusp A)) :=
equiv.MK decode_north encode decode_encode encode_decode_north
definition pequiv' : ptrunc (n + n) A ≃* ptrunc (n + n) (Ω (psusp A)) :=
pequiv_of_equiv equiv' decode_north_pt
-- We don't prove this:
-- theorem freudenthal_suspension : is_conn_fun (n+n) (loop_psusp_unit A) := sorry
end end freudenthal
open algebra group
definition freudenthal_pequiv (A : Type*) {n k : ℕ} [is_conn n A] (H : k ≤ 2 * n)
: ptrunc k A ≃* ptrunc k (Ω (psusp A)) :=
have H' : k ≤[ℕ₋₂] n + n,
by rewrite [mul.comm at H, -algebra.zero_add n at {1}]; exact of_nat_le_of_nat H,
ptrunc_pequiv_ptrunc_of_le H' (freudenthal.pequiv' A n)
definition freudenthal_equiv {A : Type*} {n k : ℕ} [is_conn n A] (H : k ≤ 2 * n)
: trunc k A ≃ trunc k (Ω (psusp A)) :=
freudenthal_pequiv A H
definition freudenthal_homotopy_group_pequiv (A : Type*) {n k : ℕ} [is_conn n A] (H : k ≤ 2 * n)
: π[k + 1] (psusp A) ≃* π[k] A :=
calc
π[k + 1] (psusp A) ≃* π[k] (Ω (psusp A)) : homotopy_group_succ_in (psusp A) k
... ≃* Ω[k] (ptrunc k (Ω (psusp A))) : homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc k (Ω (psusp A))
... ≃* Ω[k] (ptrunc k A) : loopn_pequiv_loopn k (freudenthal_pequiv A H)
... ≃* π[k] A : (homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc k A)⁻¹ᵉ*
definition freudenthal_homotopy_group_isomorphism (A : Type*) {n k : ℕ} [is_conn n A]
(H : k + 1 ≤ 2 * n) : πg[k+2] (psusp A) ≃g πg[k + 1] A :=
begin
fapply isomorphism_of_equiv,
{ exact equiv_of_pequiv (freudenthal_homotopy_group_pequiv A H)},
{ intro g h,
refine _ ⬝ !homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc_inv_con,
apply ap !homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc⁻¹ᵉ*,
refine ap (loopn_pequiv_loopn _ _) _ ⬝ !loopn_pequiv_loopn_con,
refine ap !homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc _ ⬝ !homotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc_con,
apply homotopy_group_succ_in_con}
end
definition to_pmap_freudenthal_pequiv {A : Type*} (n k : ℕ) [is_conn n A] (H : k ≤ 2 * n)
: freudenthal_pequiv A H ~* ptrunc_functor k (loop_psusp_unit A) :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x with a, reflexivity },
{ refine !idp_con ⬝ _, refine _ ⬝ ap02 _ !idp_con⁻¹, refine _ ⬝ !ap_compose, apply ap_compose }
end
definition ptrunc_elim_freudenthal_pequiv {A B : Type*} (n k : ℕ) [is_conn n A] (H : k ≤ 2 * n)
(f : A →* Ω B) [is_trunc (k.+1) (B)] :
ptrunc.elim k (Ω→ (psusp.elim f)) ∘* freudenthal_pequiv A H ~* ptrunc.elim k f :=
begin
refine pwhisker_left _ !to_pmap_freudenthal_pequiv ⬝* _,
refine !ptrunc_elim_ptrunc_functor ⬝* _,
exact ptrunc_elim_phomotopy k !ap1_psusp_elim,
end
namespace susp
definition iterate_psusp_stability_pequiv (A : Type*) {k n : ℕ} [is_conn 0 A]
(H : k ≤ 2 * n) : π[k + 1] (iterate_psusp (n + 1) A) ≃* π[k] (iterate_psusp n A) :=
have is_conn n (iterate_psusp n A), by rewrite [-zero_add n]; exact _,
freudenthal_homotopy_group_pequiv (iterate_psusp n A) H
definition iterate_psusp_stability_isomorphism (A : Type*) {k n : ℕ} [is_conn 0 A]
(H : k + 1 ≤ 2 * n) : πg[k+2] (iterate_psusp (n + 1) A) ≃g πg[k+1] (iterate_psusp n A) :=
have is_conn n (iterate_psusp n A), by rewrite [-zero_add n]; exact _,
freudenthal_homotopy_group_isomorphism (iterate_psusp n A) H
definition stability_helper1 {k n : ℕ} (H : k + 2 ≤ 2 * n) : k ≤ 2 * pred n :=
begin
rewrite [mul_pred_right], change pred (pred (k + 2)) ≤ pred (pred (2 * n)),
apply pred_le_pred, apply pred_le_pred, exact H
end
definition stability_helper2 (A : Type) {k n : ℕ} (H : k + 2 ≤ 2 * n) :
is_conn (pred n) (iterate_susp (n + 1) A) :=
have Π(n : ℕ), n = -2 + (succ n + 1),
begin intro n, induction n with n IH, reflexivity, exact ap succ IH end,
begin
cases n with n,
{ exfalso, exact not_succ_le_zero _ H},
{ esimp, rewrite [this n], apply is_conn_iterate_susp}
end
definition iterate_susp_stability_pequiv (A : Type) {k n : ℕ}
(H : k + 2 ≤ 2 * n) : π[k + 1] (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 2) A) !north) ≃*
π[k ] (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 1) A) !north) :=
have is_conn (pred n) (carrier (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 1) A) !north)), from
stability_helper2 A H,
freudenthal_homotopy_group_pequiv (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 1) A) !north)
(stability_helper1 H)
definition iterate_susp_stability_isomorphism (A : Type) {k n : ℕ}
(H : k + 3 ≤ 2 * n) : πg[k+1 +1] (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 2) A) !north) ≃g
πg[k+1] (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 1) A) !north) :=
have is_conn (pred n) (carrier (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 1) A) !north)), from
@stability_helper2 A (k+1) n H,
freudenthal_homotopy_group_isomorphism (pointed.MK (iterate_susp (n + 1) A) !north)
(stability_helper1 H)
definition iterated_freudenthal_pequiv (A : Type*) {n k m : ℕ} [HA : is_conn n A] (H : k ≤ 2 * n)
: ptrunc k A ≃* ptrunc k (Ω[m] (iterate_psusp m A)) :=
begin
revert A n k HA H, induction m with m IH: intro A n k HA H,
{ reflexivity},
{ have H2 : succ k ≤ 2 * succ n,
from calc
succ k ≤ succ (2 * n) : succ_le_succ H
... ≤ 2 * succ n : self_le_succ,
exact calc
ptrunc k A ≃* ptrunc k (Ω (psusp A)) : freudenthal_pequiv A H
... ≃* Ω (ptrunc (succ k) (psusp A)) : loop_ptrunc_pequiv
... ≃* Ω (ptrunc (succ k) (Ω[m] (iterate_psusp m (psusp A)))) :
loop_pequiv_loop (IH (psusp A) (succ n) (succ k) _ H2)
... ≃* ptrunc k (Ω[succ m] (iterate_psusp m (psusp A))) : loop_ptrunc_pequiv
... ≃* ptrunc k (Ω[succ m] (iterate_psusp (succ m) A)) :
ptrunc_pequiv_ptrunc _ (loopn_pequiv_loopn _ !iterate_psusp_succ_in)}
end
end susp
|
4efe3846b12e44e616681d48e257869bf353ea29 | 856e2e1615a12f95b551ed48fa5b03b245abba44 | /src/order/complete_lattice.lean | 4eff73521275392c184060bedc422524ea588474 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pimsp/mathlib | 8b77e1ccfab21703ba8fbe65988c7de7765aa0e5 | 913318ca9d6979686996e8d9b5ebf7e74aae1c63 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,812,465,182 | 1,597,133,610,000 | 1,597,133,610,000 | 281,890,685 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,595,491,577,000 | 1,595,491,576,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,166 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import order.bounds
/-!
# Theory of complete lattices
## Main definitions
* `Sup` and `Inf` are the supremum and the infimum of a set;
* `supr (f : ι → α)` and `infi (f : ι → α)` are indexed supremum and infimum of a function,
defined as `Sup` and `Inf` of the range of this function;
* `class complete_lattice`: a bounded lattice such that `Sup s` is always the least upper boundary
of `s` and `Inf s` is always the greatest lower boundary of `s`;
* `class complete_linear_order`: a linear ordered complete lattice.
## Naming conventions
We use `Sup`/`Inf`/`supr`/`infi` for the corresponding functions in the statement. Sometimes we
also use `bsupr`/`binfi` for "bounded` supremum or infimum, i.e. one of `⨆ i ∈ s, f i`,
`⨆ i (hi : p i), f i`, or more generally `⨆ i (hi : p i), f i hi`.
## Notation
* `⨆ i, f i` : `supr f`, the supremum of the range of `f`;
* `⨅ i, f i` : `infi f`, the infimum of the range of `f`.
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open set
variables {α β β₂ : Type*} {ι ι₂ : Sort*}
/-- class for the `Sup` operator -/
class has_Sup (α : Type*) := (Sup : set α → α)
/-- class for the `Inf` operator -/
class has_Inf (α : Type*) := (Inf : set α → α)
export has_Sup (Sup) has_Inf (Inf)
/-- Supremum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Sup.Sup
/-- Infimum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Inf.Inf
/-- Indexed supremum -/
def supr [has_Sup α] (s : ι → α) : α := Sup (range s)
/-- Indexed infimum -/
def infi [has_Inf α] (s : ι → α) : α := Inf (range s)
@[priority 50] instance has_Inf_to_nonempty (α) [has_Inf α] : nonempty α := ⟨Inf ∅⟩
@[priority 50] instance has_Sup_to_nonempty (α) [has_Sup α] : nonempty α := ⟨Sup ∅⟩
notation `⨆` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, supr f) := r
notation `⨅` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, infi f) := r
instance (α) [has_Inf α] : has_Sup (order_dual α) := ⟨(Inf : set α → α)⟩
instance (α) [has_Sup α] : has_Inf (order_dual α) := ⟨(Sup : set α → α)⟩
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A complete lattice is a bounded lattice which
has suprema and infima for every subset. -/
class complete_lattice (α : Type*) extends bounded_lattice α, has_Sup α, has_Inf α :=
(le_Sup : ∀s, ∀a∈s, a ≤ Sup s)
(Sup_le : ∀s a, (∀b∈s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a)
(Inf_le : ∀s, ∀a∈s, Inf s ≤ a)
(le_Inf : ∀s a, (∀b∈s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s)
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Inf` function
that returns the greatest lower bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities, so it should be used with
`.. complete_lattice_of_Inf α _`. -/
def complete_lattice_of_Inf (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Inf α] (is_glb_Inf : ∀ s : set α, is_glb s (Inf s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ bot := Inf univ,
bot_le := λ x, (is_glb_Inf univ).1 trivial,
top := Inf ∅,
le_top := λ a, (is_glb_Inf ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
inf := λ a b, Inf {a, b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, by { apply (is_glb_Inf _).2, simp [*] },
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ by simp [*],
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.left,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.right,
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).2 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).1 ha,
Sup := λ s, Inf (upper_bounds s),
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).2 $ λ b hb, hb ha,
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Sup` function
that returns the least upper bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities, so it should be used with
`.. complete_lattice_of_Sup α _`. -/
def complete_lattice_of_Sup (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Sup α] (is_lub_Sup : ∀ s : set α, is_lub s (Sup s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ top := Sup univ,
le_top := λ x, (is_lub_Sup univ).1 trivial,
bot := Sup ∅,
bot_le := λ x, (is_lub_Sup ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Sup {a, b},
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (by simp [*]),
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf := λ a b, Sup {x | x ≤ a ∧ x ≤ b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ by simp [*],
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.left),
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.right),
Inf := λ s, Sup (lower_bounds s),
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).2 ha,
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).1 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).2 (λ b hb, hb ha),
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/-- A complete linear order is a linear order whose lattice structure is complete. -/
class complete_linear_order (α : Type*) extends complete_lattice α, decidable_linear_order α
end prio
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
@[ematch] theorem le_Sup : a ∈ s → a ≤ Sup s := complete_lattice.le_Sup s a
theorem Sup_le : (∀b∈s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a := complete_lattice.Sup_le s a
@[ematch] theorem Inf_le : a ∈ s → Inf s ≤ a := complete_lattice.Inf_le s a
theorem le_Inf : (∀b∈s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s := complete_lattice.le_Inf s a
lemma is_lub_Sup (s : set α) : is_lub s (Sup s) := ⟨assume x, le_Sup, assume x, Sup_le⟩
lemma is_lub.Sup_eq (h : is_lub s a) : Sup s = a := (is_lub_Sup s).unique h
lemma is_glb_Inf (s : set α) : is_glb s (Inf s) := ⟨assume a, Inf_le, assume a, le_Inf⟩
lemma is_glb.Inf_eq (h : is_glb s a) : Inf s = a := (is_glb_Inf s).unique h
theorem le_Sup_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ Sup s :=
le_trans h (le_Sup hb)
theorem Inf_le_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : Inf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (Inf_le hb) h
theorem Sup_le_Sup (h : s ⊆ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
(is_lub_Sup s).mono (is_lub_Sup t) h
theorem Inf_le_Inf (h : s ⊆ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
(is_glb_Inf s).mono (is_glb_Inf t) h
@[simp] theorem Sup_le_iff : Sup s ≤ a ↔ (∀b ∈ s, b ≤ a) :=
is_lub_le_iff (is_lub_Sup s)
@[simp] theorem le_Inf_iff : a ≤ Inf s ↔ (∀b ∈ s, a ≤ b) :=
le_is_glb_iff (is_glb_Inf s)
theorem Inf_le_Sup (hs : s.nonempty) : Inf s ≤ Sup s :=
is_glb_le_is_lub (is_glb_Inf s) (is_lub_Sup s) hs
-- TODO: it is weird that we have to add union_def
theorem Sup_union {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∪ t) = Sup s ⊔ Sup t :=
((is_lub_Sup s).union (is_lub_Sup t)).Sup_eq
theorem Sup_inter_le {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∩ t) ≤ Sup s ⊓ Sup t :=
by finish
/-
Sup_le (assume a ⟨a_s, a_t⟩, le_inf (le_Sup a_s) (le_Sup a_t))
-/
theorem Inf_union {s t : set α} : Inf (s ∪ t) = Inf s ⊓ Inf t :=
((is_glb_Inf s).union (is_glb_Inf t)).Inf_eq
theorem le_Inf_inter {s t : set α} : Inf s ⊔ Inf t ≤ Inf (s ∩ t) :=
by finish
/-
le_Inf (assume a ⟨a_s, a_t⟩, sup_le (Inf_le a_s) (Inf_le a_t))
-/
@[simp] theorem Sup_empty : Sup ∅ = (⊥ : α) :=
is_lub_empty.Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_empty : Inf ∅ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_glb_empty α _).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Sup_univ : Sup univ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_lub_univ α _).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_univ : Inf univ = (⊥ : α) :=
is_glb_univ.Inf_eq
-- TODO(Jeremy): get this automatically
@[simp] theorem Sup_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Sup (insert a s) = a ⊔ Sup s :=
((is_lub_Sup s).insert a).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Inf (insert a s) = a ⊓ Inf s :=
((is_glb_Inf s).insert a).Inf_eq
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cSup_singleton`.
theorem Sup_singleton {a : α} : Sup {a} = a :=
is_lub_singleton.Sup_eq
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cInf_singleton`.
theorem Inf_singleton {a : α} : Inf {a} = a :=
is_glb_singleton.Inf_eq
theorem Sup_pair {a b : α} : Sup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@is_lub_pair α _ a b).Sup_eq
theorem Inf_pair {a b : α} : Inf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@is_glb_pair α _ a b).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_eq_top : Inf s = ⊤ ↔ (∀a∈s, a = ⊤) :=
iff.intro
(assume h a ha, top_unique $ h ▸ Inf_le ha)
(assume h, top_unique $ le_Inf $ assume a ha, top_le_iff.2 $ h a ha)
@[simp] theorem Sup_eq_bot : Sup s = ⊥ ↔ (∀a∈s, a = ⊥) :=
iff.intro
(assume h a ha, bot_unique $ h ▸ le_Sup ha)
(assume h, bot_unique $ Sup_le $ assume a ha, le_bot_iff.2 $ h a ha)
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
lemma Inf_lt_iff : Inf s < b ↔ (∃a∈s, a < b) :=
is_glb_lt_iff (is_glb_Inf s)
lemma lt_Sup_iff : b < Sup s ↔ (∃a∈s, b < a) :=
lt_is_lub_iff (is_lub_Sup s)
lemma Sup_eq_top : Sup s = ⊤ ↔ (∀b<⊤, ∃a∈s, b < a) :=
iff.intro
(assume (h : Sup s = ⊤) b hb, by rwa [←h, lt_Sup_iff] at hb)
(assume h, top_unique $ le_of_not_gt $ assume h',
let ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := h _ h' in
lt_irrefl a $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_Sup ha) h)
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma Inf_eq_bot : Inf s = ⊥ ↔ (∀b>⊥, ∃a∈s, a < b) :=
iff.intro
(assume (h : Inf s = ⊥) b (hb : ⊥ < b), by rwa [←h, Inf_lt_iff] at hb)
(assume h, bot_unique $ le_of_not_gt $ assume h',
let ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := h _ h' in
lt_irrefl a $ lt_of_lt_of_le h (Inf_le ha))
lemma lt_supr_iff {f : ι → α} : a < supr f ↔ (∃i, a < f i) :=
lt_Sup_iff.trans exists_range_iff
lemma infi_lt_iff {f : ι → α} : infi f < a ↔ (∃i, f i < a) :=
Inf_lt_iff.trans exists_range_iff
end complete_linear_order
/- supr & infi -/
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {s t : ι → α} {a b : α}
-- TODO: this declaration gives error when starting smt state
--@[ematch]
theorem le_supr (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : s i ≤ supr s :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] theorem le_supr' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: s i ≤ supr s :) :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
/- TODO: this version would be more powerful, but, alas, the pattern matcher
doesn't accept it.
@[ematch] theorem le_supr' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: s i :) ≤ (: supr s :) :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
-/
lemma is_lub_supr : is_lub (range s) (⨆j, s j) := is_lub_Sup _
lemma is_lub.supr_eq (h : is_lub (range s) a) : (⨆j, s j) = a := h.Sup_eq
lemma is_glb_infi : is_glb (range s) (⨅j, s j) := is_glb_Inf _
lemma is_glb.infi_eq (h : is_glb (range s) a) : (⨅j, s j) = a := h.Inf_eq
theorem le_supr_of_le (i : ι) (h : a ≤ s i) : a ≤ supr s :=
le_trans h (le_supr _ i)
theorem le_bsupr {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) :
f i hi ≤ ⨆ i hi, f i hi :=
le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (f i) hi
theorem supr_le (h : ∀i, s i ≤ a) : supr s ≤ a :=
Sup_le $ assume b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
theorem bsupr_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ a) :
(⨆ i (hi : p i), f i hi) ≤ a :=
supr_le $ λ i, supr_le $ h i
theorem supr_le_supr (h : ∀i, s i ≤ t i) : supr s ≤ supr t :=
supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le i (h i)
theorem supr_le_supr2 {t : ι₂ → α} (h : ∀i, ∃j, s i ≤ t j) : supr s ≤ supr t :=
supr_le $ assume j, exists.elim (h j) le_supr_of_le
theorem bsupr_le_bsupr {p : ι → Prop} {f g : Π i (hi : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ g i hi) :
(⨆ i hi, f i hi) ≤ ⨆ i hi, g i hi :=
bsupr_le $ λ i hi, le_trans (h i hi) (le_bsupr i hi)
theorem supr_le_supr_const (h : ι → ι₂) : (⨆ i:ι, a) ≤ (⨆ j:ι₂, a) :=
supr_le $ le_supr _ ∘ h
@[simp] theorem supr_le_iff : supr s ≤ a ↔ (∀i, s i ≤ a) :=
(is_lub_le_iff is_lub_supr).trans forall_range_iff
theorem Sup_eq_supr {s : set α} : Sup s = (⨆a ∈ s, a) :=
le_antisymm
(Sup_le $ assume b h, le_supr_of_le b $ le_supr _ h)
(supr_le $ assume b, supr_le $ assume h, le_Sup h)
lemma le_supr_iff : (a ≤ supr s) ↔ (∀ b, (∀ i, s i ≤ b) → a ≤ b) :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans h (supr_le hb), λ h, h _ $ λ i, le_supr s i⟩
lemma monotone.le_map_supr [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆ i, f (s i)) ≤ f (supr s) :=
supr_le $ λ i, hf $ le_supr _ _
lemma monotone.le_map_supr2 [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
{ι' : ι → Sort*} (s : Π i, ι' i → α) :
(⨆ i (h : ι' i), f (s i h)) ≤ f (⨆ i (h : ι' i), s i h) :=
calc (⨆ i h, f (s i h)) ≤ (⨆ i, f (⨆ h, s i h)) :
supr_le_supr $ λ i, hf.le_map_supr
... ≤ f (⨆ i (h : ι' i), s i h) : hf.le_map_supr
lemma monotone.le_map_Sup [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆a∈s, f a) ≤ f (Sup s) :=
by rw [Sup_eq_supr]; exact hf.le_map_supr2 _
lemma supr_comp_le {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') :
(⨆ x, f (g x)) ≤ ⨆ y, f y :=
supr_le_supr2 $ λ x, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩
lemma monotone.supr_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ≤ s i) :
(⨆ x, f (s x)) = ⨆ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (supr_comp_le _ _) (supr_le_supr2 $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi)
lemma supr_congr {f : β → α} {g : β₂ → α} (h : β → β₂)
(h1 : function.surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ y, g y :=
by { unfold supr, congr' 1, convert h1.range_comp g, ext, rw ←h2 }
-- TODO: finish doesn't do well here.
@[congr] theorem supr_congr_Prop {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : supr f₁ = supr f₂ :=
begin
unfold supr,
apply congr_arg,
ext,
simp,
split,
exact λ⟨h, W⟩, ⟨pq.1 h, eq.trans (f (pq.1 h)).symm W⟩,
exact λ⟨h, W⟩, ⟨pq.2 h, eq.trans (f h) W⟩
end
theorem infi_le (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : infi s ≤ s i :=
Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] theorem infi_le' (s : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: infi s ≤ s i :) :=
Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
/- I wanted to see if this would help for infi_comm; it doesn't.
@[ematch] theorem infi_le₂' (s : ι → ι₂ → α) (i : ι) (j : ι₂) : (: ⨅ i j, s i j :) ≤ (: s i j :) :=
begin
transitivity,
apply (infi_le (λ i, ⨅ j, s i j) i),
apply infi_le
end
-/
theorem infi_le_of_le (i : ι) (h : s i ≤ a) : infi s ≤ a :=
le_trans (infi_le _ i) h
theorem binfi_le {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} (i : ι) (hi : p i) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ f i hi :=
infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le (f i) hi
theorem le_infi (h : ∀i, a ≤ s i) : a ≤ infi s :=
le_Inf $ assume b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
theorem le_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, a ≤ f i hi) :
a ≤ ⨅ i hi, f i hi :=
le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ h i
theorem infi_le_infi (h : ∀i, s i ≤ t i) : infi s ≤ infi t :=
le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i (h i)
theorem infi_le_infi2 {t : ι₂ → α} (h : ∀j, ∃i, s i ≤ t j) : infi s ≤ infi t :=
le_infi $ assume j, exists.elim (h j) infi_le_of_le
theorem binfi_le_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f g : Π i (h : p i), α} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≤ g i hi) :
(⨅ i hi, f i hi) ≤ ⨅ i hi, g i hi :=
le_binfi $ λ i hi, le_trans (binfi_le i hi) (h i hi)
theorem infi_le_infi_const (h : ι₂ → ι) : (⨅ i:ι, a) ≤ (⨅ j:ι₂, a) :=
le_infi $ infi_le _ ∘ h
@[simp] theorem le_infi_iff : a ≤ infi s ↔ (∀i, a ≤ s i) :=
⟨assume : a ≤ infi s, assume i, le_trans this (infi_le _ _), le_infi⟩
theorem Inf_eq_infi {s : set α} : Inf s = (⨅a ∈ s, a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume b, le_infi $ assume h, Inf_le h)
(le_Inf $ assume b h, infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ h)
lemma monotone.map_infi_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (infi s) ≤ (⨅ i, f (s i)) :=
le_infi $ λ i, hf $ infi_le _ _
lemma monotone.map_infi2_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
{ι' : ι → Sort*} (s : Π i, ι' i → α) :
f (⨅ i (h : ι' i), s i h) ≤ (⨅ i (h : ι' i), f (s i h)) :=
calc f (⨅ i (h : ι' i), s i h) ≤ (⨅ i, f (⨅ h, s i h)) : hf.map_infi_le
... ≤ (⨅ i h, f (s i h)) : infi_le_infi $ λ i, hf.map_infi_le
lemma monotone.map_Inf_le [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (Inf s) ≤ ⨅ a∈s, f a :=
by rw [Inf_eq_infi]; exact hf.map_infi2_le _
lemma le_infi_comp {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') :
(⨅ y, f y) ≤ ⨅ x, f (g x) :=
infi_le_infi2 $ λ x, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩
lemma monotone.infi_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, s i ≤ x) :
(⨅ x, f (s x)) = ⨅ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (infi_le_infi2 $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi) (le_infi_comp _ _)
lemma infi_congr {f : β → α} {g : β₂ → α} (h : β → β₂)
(h1 : function.surjective h) (h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
by { unfold infi, congr' 1, convert h1.range_comp g, ext, rw ←h2 }
@[congr] theorem infi_congr_Prop {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : infi f₁ = infi f₂ :=
begin
unfold infi,
apply congr_arg,
ext,
simp,
split,
exact λ⟨h, W⟩, ⟨pq.1 h, eq.trans (f (pq.1 h)).symm W⟩,
exact λ⟨h, W⟩, ⟨pq.2 h, eq.trans (f h) W⟩
end
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cinfi_const`.
theorem infi_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨅ b:ι, a) = a :=
by rw [infi, range_const, Inf_singleton]
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csupr_const`.
theorem supr_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨆ b:ι, a) = a :=
by rw [supr, range_const, Sup_singleton]
@[simp] lemma infi_top : (⨅i:ι, ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ le_infi $ assume i, le_refl _
@[simp] lemma supr_bot : (⨆i:ι, ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume i, le_refl _
@[simp] lemma infi_eq_top : infi s = ⊤ ↔ (∀i, s i = ⊤) :=
iff.intro
(assume eq i, top_unique $ eq ▸ infi_le _ _)
(assume h, top_unique $ le_infi $ assume i, top_le_iff.2 $ h i)
@[simp] lemma supr_eq_bot : supr s = ⊥ ↔ (∀i, s i = ⊥) :=
iff.intro
(assume eq i, bot_unique $ eq ▸ le_supr _ _)
(assume h, bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume i, le_bot_iff.2 $ h i)
@[simp] lemma infi_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ assume h, le_refl _)
@[simp] lemma infi_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top $ le_infi $ assume h, (hp h).elim
@[simp] lemma supr_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume h, le_refl _) (le_supr _ _)
@[simp] lemma supr_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume h, (hp h).elim) bot_le
lemma supr_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨆h:p, a h) = (if h : p then a h else ⊥) :=
by by_cases p; simp [h]
lemma supr_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨆h:p, a) = (if p then a else ⊥) :=
by rw [supr_eq_dif, dif_eq_if]
lemma infi_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨅h:p, a h) = (if h : p then a h else ⊤) :=
by by_cases p; simp [h]
lemma infi_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨅h:p, a) = (if p then a else ⊤) :=
by rw [infi_eq_dif, dif_eq_if]
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
theorem infi_comm {f : ι → ι₂ → α} : (⨅i, ⨅j, f i j) = (⨅j, ⨅i, f i j) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le_of_le j $ infi_le _ i)
(le_infi $ assume j, le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ j)
/- TODO: this is strange. In the proof below, we get exactly the desired
among the equalities, but close does not get it.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
simp, intros,
begin [smt]
ematch, ematch, ematch, trace_state, have := le_refl (f i_1 i),
trace_state, close
end
end
-/
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
theorem supr_comm {f : ι → ι₂ → α} : (⨆i, ⨆j, f i j) = (⨆j, ⨆i, f i j) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume j, le_supr_of_le j $ le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ assume j, supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr _ j)
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_left {b : β} {f : Πx:β, x = b → α} : (⨅x, ⨅h:x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ rfl)
(le_infi $ assume b', le_infi $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_refl _ end)
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_right {b : β} {f : Πx:β, b = x → α} : (⨅x, ⨅h:b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ rfl)
(le_infi $ assume b', le_infi $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_refl _ end)
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_left {b : β} {f : Πx:β, x = b → α} : (⨆x, ⨆h : x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume b', supr_le $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_refl _ end)
(le_supr_of_le b $ le_supr _ rfl)
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_right {b : β} {f : Πx:β, b = x → α} : (⨆x, ⨆h : b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume b', supr_le $ assume eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_refl _ end)
(le_supr_of_le b $ le_supr _ rfl)
attribute [ematch] le_refl
theorem infi_inf_eq {f g : ι → α} : (⨅ x, f x ⊓ g x) = (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ (⨅ x, g x) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i inf_le_left)
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le i inf_le_right))
(le_infi $ assume i, le_inf
(inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _)
(inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le _ _))
/- TODO: here is another example where more flexible pattern matching
might help.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
safe, pose h := f a ⊓ g a, begin [smt] ematch, ematch end
end
-/
lemma infi_inf {f : ι → α} {a : α} (i : ι) : (⨅x, f x) ⊓ a = (⨅ x, f x ⊓ a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_inf (inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _) inf_le_right)
(le_inf (infi_le_infi $ assume i, inf_le_left) (infi_le_of_le i inf_le_right))
lemma inf_infi {f : ι → α} {a : α} (i : ι) : a ⊓ (⨅x, f x) = (⨅ x, a ⊓ f x) :=
by rw [inf_comm, infi_inf i]; simp [inf_comm]
lemma binfi_inf {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} {a : α} {i : ι} (hi : p i) :
(⨅i (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ a = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i h ⊓ a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume hi,
le_inf (inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _) inf_le_right)
(le_inf (infi_le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_infi $ assume hi, inf_le_left)
(infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le_of_le hi $ inf_le_right))
theorem supr_sup_eq {f g : β → α} : (⨆ x, f x ⊔ g x) = (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ (⨆ x, g x) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume i, sup_le
(le_sup_left_of_le $ le_supr _ _)
(le_sup_right_of_le $ le_supr _ _))
(sup_le
(supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le i le_sup_left)
(supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le i le_sup_right))
/- supr and infi under Prop -/
@[simp] theorem infi_false {s : false → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top (le_infi $ assume i, false.elim i)
@[simp] theorem supr_false {s : false → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume i, false.elim i) bot_le
@[simp] theorem infi_true {s : true → α} : infi s = s trivial :=
le_antisymm (infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ assume ⟨⟩, le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem supr_true {s : true → α} : supr s = s trivial :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume ⟨⟩, le_refl _) (le_supr _ _)
@[simp] theorem infi_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i, ⨅ h:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
@[simp] theorem supr_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i, ⨆ h:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (λh:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) _)
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume : p i, le_supr _ _)
theorem infi_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : infi s = (⨅ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
/-- The symmetric case of `infi_and`, useful for rewriting into a infimum over a conjunction -/
lemma infi_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨅ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨅ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact infi_and }
theorem supr_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : supr s = (⨆ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (λj, s ⟨i, j⟩) _)
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume j, le_supr _ _)
/-- The symmetric case of `supr_and`, useful for rewriting into a supremum over a conjunction -/
lemma supr_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨆ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨆ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact supr_and }
theorem infi_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
infi s = (⨅ h : p, s (or.inl h)) ⊓ (⨅ h : q, s (or.inr h)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩)
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩))
(le_infi $ assume i, match i with
| or.inl i := inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _
| or.inr j := inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le _ _
end)
theorem supr_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
(⨆ x, s x) = (⨆ i, s (or.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, s (or.inr j)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume s, match s with
| or.inl i := le_sup_left_of_le $ le_supr _ i
| or.inr j := le_sup_right_of_le $ le_supr _ j
end)
(sup_le
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume i, ⟨or.inl i, le_refl _⟩)
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume j, ⟨or.inr j, le_refl _⟩))
lemma Sup_range {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] {f : ι → α} : Sup (range f) = supr f := rfl
lemma Inf_range {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] {f : ι → α} : Inf (range f) = infi f := rfl
lemma supr_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨆b∈range f, g b) = (⨆i, g (f i)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume b, supr_le $ assume ⟨i, (h : f i = b)⟩, h ▸ le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ assume i, le_supr_of_le (f i) $ le_supr (λp, g (f i)) (mem_range_self _))
lemma infi_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨅b∈range f, g b) = (⨅i, g (f i)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le (f i) $ infi_le (λp, g (f i)) (mem_range_self _))
(le_infi $ assume b, le_infi $ assume ⟨i, (h : f i = b)⟩, h ▸ infi_le _ i)
theorem Inf_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Inf (f '' s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, f a) :=
calc Inf (set.image f s) = (⨅a, ⨅h : ∃b, b ∈ s ∧ f b = a, a) : Inf_eq_infi
... = (⨅a, ⨅b, ⨅h : f b = a ∧ b ∈ s, a) : by simp [and_comm]
... = (⨅a, ⨅b, ⨅h : a = f b, ⨅h : b ∈ s, a) : by simp [infi_and, eq_comm]
... = (⨅b, ⨅a, ⨅h : a = f b, ⨅h : b ∈ s, a) : by rw [infi_comm]
... = (⨅a∈s, f a) : congr_arg infi $ by funext x; rw [infi_infi_eq_left]
theorem Sup_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Sup (f '' s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, f a) :=
calc Sup (set.image f s) = (⨆a, ⨆h : ∃b, b ∈ s ∧ f b = a, a) : Sup_eq_supr
... = (⨆a, ⨆b, ⨆h : f b = a ∧ b ∈ s, a) : by simp [and_comm]
... = (⨆a, ⨆b, ⨆h : a = f b, ⨆h : b ∈ s, a) : by simp [supr_and, eq_comm]
... = (⨆b, ⨆a, ⨆h : a = f b, ⨆h : b ∈ s, a) : by rw [supr_comm]
... = (⨆a∈s, f a) : congr_arg supr $ by funext x; rw [supr_supr_eq_left]
/- supr and infi under set constructions -/
theorem infi_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊤ :=
by simp
theorem supr_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊥ :=
by simp
theorem infi_univ {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨅ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem supr_univ {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨆ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem infi_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} : (⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨅x∈s, f x) ⊓ (⨅x∈t, f x) :=
calc (⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨅ x, (⨅h : x∈s, f x) ⊓ (⨅h : x∈t, f x)) : congr_arg infi $ funext $ assume x, infi_or
... = (⨅x∈s, f x) ⊓ (⨅x∈t, f x) : infi_inf_eq
lemma infi_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨅ i, f i) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
by simpa [classical.em] using @infi_union _ _ _ f {i | p i} {i | ¬ p i}
lemma infi_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨅ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊓ (⨅ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
by convert infi_split _ _; simp
theorem infi_le_infi_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨅ x ∈ t, f x) ≤ (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by rw [(union_eq_self_of_subset_left h).symm, infi_union]; exact inf_le_left
theorem supr_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} : (⨆ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨆x∈s, f x) ⊔ (⨆x∈t, f x) :=
calc (⨆ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨆ x, (⨆h : x∈s, f x) ⊔ (⨆h : x∈t, f x)) : congr_arg supr $ funext $ assume x, supr_or
... = (⨆x∈s, f x) ⊔ (⨆x∈t, f x) : supr_sup_eq
lemma supr_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨆ i, f i) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
by simpa [classical.em] using @supr_union _ _ _ f {i | p i} {i | ¬ p i}
lemma supr_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨆ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊔ (⨆ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
by convert supr_split _ _; simp
theorem supr_le_supr_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨆ x ∈ s, f x) ≤ (⨆ x ∈ t, f x) :=
by rw [(union_eq_self_of_subset_left h).symm, supr_union]; exact le_sup_left
theorem infi_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊓ (⨅x∈s, f x) :=
eq.trans infi_union $ congr_arg (λx:α, x ⊓ (⨅x∈s, f x)) infi_infi_eq_left
theorem supr_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊔ (⨆x∈s, f x) :=
eq.trans supr_union $ congr_arg (λx:α, x ⊔ (⨆x∈s, f x)) supr_supr_eq_left
theorem infi_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
by simp
theorem infi_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊓ f b :=
by rw [infi_insert, infi_singleton]
theorem supr_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
by simp
theorem supr_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊔ f b :=
by rw [supr_insert, supr_singleton]
lemma infi_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨅ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨅ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume b, le_infi $ assume hbt,
infi_le_of_le (f b) $ infi_le (λ_, g (f b)) (mem_image_of_mem f hbt))
(le_infi $ assume c, le_infi $ assume ⟨b, hbt, eq⟩,
eq ▸ infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le (λ_, g (f b)) hbt)
lemma supr_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨆ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨆ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume c, supr_le $ assume ⟨b, hbt, eq⟩,
eq ▸ le_supr_of_le b $ le_supr (λ_, g (f b)) hbt)
(supr_le $ assume b, supr_le $ assume hbt,
le_supr_of_le (f b) $ le_supr (λ_, g (f b)) (mem_image_of_mem f hbt))
/- supr and infi under Type -/
theorem infi_of_empty' (h : ι → false) {s : ι → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
top_unique (le_infi $ assume i, (h i).elim)
theorem supr_of_empty' (h : ι → false) {s : ι → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
bot_unique (supr_le $ assume i, (h i).elim)
theorem infi_of_empty (h : ¬nonempty ι) {s : ι → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
infi_of_empty' (λ i, h ⟨i⟩)
theorem supr_of_empty (h : ¬nonempty ι) {s : ι → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
supr_of_empty' (λ i, h ⟨i⟩)
@[simp] theorem infi_empty {s : empty → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
infi_of_empty nonempty_empty
@[simp] theorem supr_empty {s : empty → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
supr_of_empty nonempty_empty
@[simp] theorem infi_unit {f : unit → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = f () :=
le_antisymm (infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ assume ⟨⟩, le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem supr_unit {f : unit → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = f () :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ assume ⟨⟩, le_refl _) (le_supr _ _)
lemma supr_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨆b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊔ f ff :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume b, match b with tt := le_sup_left | ff := le_sup_right end)
(sup_le (le_supr _ _) (le_supr _ _))
lemma infi_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨅b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊓ f ff :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _))
(le_infi $ assume b, match b with tt := inf_le_left | ff := inf_le_right end)
theorem infi_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
lemma infi_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨅ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@infi_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma infi_subtype'' {ι} (s : set ι) (f : ι → α) :
(⨅ i : s, f i) = ⨅ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ s), f t :=
infi_subtype
lemma is_glb_binfi {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_glb (f '' s) (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, infi_subtype'] using @is_glb_infi α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem supr_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (λh:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) _)
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume : p i, le_supr _ _)
lemma supr_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨆ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨆ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@supr_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma Sup_eq_supr' {s : set α} : Sup s = ⨆ x : s, (x : α) :=
by rw [Sup_eq_supr, supr_subtype']; refl
lemma is_lub_bsupr {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_lub (f '' s) (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, supr_subtype'] using @is_lub_supr α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem infi_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume : p i, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
theorem supr_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (λh:p i, f ⟨i, h⟩) _)
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume : p i, le_supr _ _)
theorem infi_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i j, f (i, j)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume j, infi_le _ _)
(le_infi $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ _)
theorem supr_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i j, f (i, j)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume ⟨i, h⟩, le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (λj, f ⟨i, j⟩) _)
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume j, le_supr _ _)
theorem infi_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊓ (⨅ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume i, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩)
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume j, ⟨_, le_refl _⟩))
(le_infi $ assume s, match s with
| sum.inl i := inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _
| sum.inr j := inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le _ _
end)
theorem supr_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume s, match s with
| sum.inl i := le_sup_left_of_le $ le_supr _ i
| sum.inr j := le_sup_right_of_le $ le_supr _ j
end)
(sup_le
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume i, ⟨sum.inl i, le_refl _⟩)
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume j, ⟨sum.inr j, le_refl _⟩))
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α]
lemma supr_eq_top (f : ι → α) : supr f = ⊤ ↔ (∀b<⊤, ∃i, b < f i) :=
by simp only [← Sup_range, Sup_eq_top, set.exists_range_iff]
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma infi_eq_bot (f : ι → α) : infi f = ⊥ ↔ (∀b>⊥, ∃i, f i < b) :=
by simp only [← Inf_range, Inf_eq_bot, set.exists_range_iff]
end complete_linear_order
/- Instances -/
instance complete_lattice_Prop : complete_lattice Prop :=
{ Sup := λs, ∃a∈s, a,
le_Sup := assume s a h p, ⟨a, h, p⟩,
Sup_le := assume s a h ⟨b, h', p⟩, h b h' p,
Inf := λs, ∀a:Prop, a∈s → a,
Inf_le := assume s a h p, p a h,
le_Inf := assume s a h p b hb, h b hb p,
.. bounded_distrib_lattice_Prop }
lemma Inf_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Inf s = (∀p ∈ s, p) := rfl
lemma Sup_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Sup s = (∃p ∈ s, p) := rfl
lemma infi_Prop_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} : (⨅i, p i) = (∀i, p i) :=
le_antisymm (assume h i, h _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ ) (assume h p ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i)
lemma supr_Prop_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} : (⨆i, p i) = (∃i, p i) :=
le_antisymm (λ ⟨q, ⟨i, (eq : p i = q)⟩, hq⟩, ⟨i, eq.symm ▸ hq⟩) (λ ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨p i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩)
instance pi.has_Sup {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] : has_Sup (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨆ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.has_Inf {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)] : has_Inf (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨅ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.complete_lattice {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, complete_lattice (β i)] :
complete_lattice (Π i, β i) :=
{ Sup := Sup,
Inf := Inf,
le_Sup := λ s f hf i, le_supr (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Inf_le := λ s f hf i, infi_le (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Sup_le := λ s f hf i, supr_le $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
le_Inf := λ s f hf i, le_infi $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
.. pi.bounded_lattice }
lemma Inf_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{s : set (Πa, β a)} {a : α} :
(Inf s) a = (⨅ f : s, (f : Πa, β a) a) :=
rfl
lemma infi_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{f : ι → Πa, β a} {a : α} :
(⨅i, f i) a = (⨅i, f i a) :=
by rw [infi, Inf_apply, infi, infi, ← image_eq_range (λ f : Π i, β i, f a) (range f), ← range_comp]
lemma Sup_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] {s : set (Πa, β a)} {a : α} :
(Sup s) a = (⨆f:s, (f : Πa, β a) a) :=
rfl
lemma supr_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] {f : ι → Πa, β a}
{a : α} :
(⨆i, f i) a = (⨆i, f i a) :=
@infi_apply α (λ i, order_dual (β i)) _ _ f a
section complete_lattice
variables [preorder α] [complete_lattice β]
theorem monotone_Sup_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀f∈s, monotone f) : monotone (Sup s) :=
assume x y h, supr_le $ λ f, le_supr_of_le f $ m_s f f.2 h
theorem monotone_Inf_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀f∈s, monotone f) : monotone (Inf s) :=
assume x y h, le_infi $ λ f, infi_le_of_le f $ m_s f f.2 h
end complete_lattice
namespace order_dual
variable (α)
instance [complete_lattice α] : complete_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ le_Sup := @complete_lattice.Inf_le α _,
Sup_le := @complete_lattice.le_Inf α _,
Inf_le := @complete_lattice.le_Sup α _,
le_Inf := @complete_lattice.Sup_le α _,
.. order_dual.bounded_lattice α, ..order_dual.has_Sup α, ..order_dual.has_Inf α }
instance [complete_linear_order α] : complete_linear_order (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.complete_lattice α, .. order_dual.decidable_linear_order α }
end order_dual
namespace prod
variables (α β)
instance [has_Inf α] [has_Inf β] : has_Inf (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Inf (prod.fst '' s), Inf (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [has_Sup α] [has_Sup β] : has_Sup (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Sup (prod.fst '' s), Sup (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [complete_lattice α] [complete_lattice β] : complete_lattice (α × β) :=
{ le_Sup := assume s p hab, ⟨le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
Sup_le := assume s p h,
⟨ Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).1,
Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
Inf_le := assume s p hab, ⟨Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
le_Inf := assume s p h,
⟨ le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).1,
le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
.. prod.bounded_lattice α β,
.. prod.has_Sup α β,
.. prod.has_Inf α β }
end prod
|
1a0c496bd0830fd8e99fcbbb05b1a86fb7c6c447 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/measure_theory/group/integration.lean | 1143a97806c65af239036f52e3c6d9b739739a4f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,406 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import measure_theory.integral.bochner
import measure_theory.group.measure
import measure_theory.group.action
/-!
# Integration on Groups
We develop properties of integrals with a group as domain.
This file contains properties about integrability, Lebesgue integration and Bochner integration.
-/
namespace measure_theory
open measure topological_space
open_locale ennreal
variables {𝕜 M α G E F : Type*} [measurable_space G]
variables [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E] [normed_group F]
variables {μ : measure G} {f : G → E} {g : G}
section measurable_inv
variables [group G] [has_measurable_inv G]
@[to_additive]
lemma integrable.comp_inv [is_inv_invariant μ] {f : G → F} (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable (λ t, f t⁻¹) μ :=
(hf.mono_measure (map_inv_eq_self μ).le).comp_measurable measurable_inv
@[to_additive]
lemma integral_inv_eq_self (f : G → E) (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ] :
∫ x, f (x⁻¹) ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
have h : measurable_embedding (λ x : G, x⁻¹) :=
(measurable_equiv.inv G).measurable_embedding,
rw [← h.integral_map, map_inv_eq_self]
end
end measurable_inv
section measurable_mul
variables [group G] [has_measurable_mul G]
/-- Translating a function by left-multiplication does not change its `measure_theory.lintegral`
with respect to a left-invariant measure. -/
@[to_additive "Translating a function by left-addition does not change its
`measure_theory.lintegral` with respect to a left-invariant measure."]
lemma lintegral_mul_left_eq_self [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (g : G) :
∫⁻ x, f (g * x) ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
convert (lintegral_map_equiv f $ measurable_equiv.mul_left g).symm,
simp [map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
end
/-- Translating a function by right-multiplication does not change its `measure_theory.lintegral`
with respect to a right-invariant measure. -/
@[to_additive "Translating a function by right-addition does not change its
`measure_theory.lintegral` with respect to a right-invariant measure."]
lemma lintegral_mul_right_eq_self [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (g : G) :
∫⁻ x, f (x * g) ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
convert (lintegral_map_equiv f $ measurable_equiv.mul_right g).symm,
simp [map_mul_right_eq_self μ g]
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lintegral_div_right_eq_self [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (g : G) :
∫⁻ x, f (x / g) ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, lintegral_mul_right_eq_self f g⁻¹]
/-- Translating a function by left-multiplication does not change its integral with respect to a
left-invariant measure. -/
@[simp, to_additive "Translating a function by left-addition does not change its integral with
respect to a left-invariant measure."]
lemma integral_mul_left_eq_self [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (f : G → E) (g : G) :
∫ x, f (g * x) ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
have h_mul : measurable_embedding (λ x, g * x) :=
(measurable_equiv.mul_left g).measurable_embedding,
rw [← h_mul.integral_map, map_mul_left_eq_self]
end
/-- Translating a function by right-multiplication does not change its integral with respect to a
right-invariant measure. -/
@[simp, to_additive "Translating a function by right-addition does not change its integral with
respect to a right-invariant measure."]
lemma integral_mul_right_eq_self [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (f : G → E) (g : G) :
∫ x, f (x * g) ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
have h_mul : measurable_embedding (λ x, x * g) :=
(measurable_equiv.mul_right g).measurable_embedding,
rw [← h_mul.integral_map, map_mul_right_eq_self]
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma integral_div_right_eq_self [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (f : G → E) (g : G) :
∫ x, f (x / g) ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, integral_mul_right_eq_self f g⁻¹]
/-- If some left-translate of a function negates it, then the integral of the function with respect
to a left-invariant measure is 0. -/
@[to_additive "If some left-translate of a function negates it, then the integral of the function
with respect to a left-invariant measure is 0."]
lemma integral_eq_zero_of_mul_left_eq_neg [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (hf' : ∀ x, f (g * x) = - f x) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
by simp_rw [← self_eq_neg ℝ E, ← integral_neg, ← hf', integral_mul_left_eq_self]
/-- If some right-translate of a function negates it, then the integral of the function with respect
to a right-invariant measure is 0. -/
@[to_additive "If some right-translate of a function negates it, then the integral of the function
with respect to a right-invariant measure is 0."]
lemma integral_eq_zero_of_mul_right_eq_neg [is_mul_right_invariant μ]
(hf' : ∀ x, f (x * g) = - f x) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
by simp_rw [← self_eq_neg ℝ E, ← integral_neg, ← hf', integral_mul_right_eq_self]
@[to_additive]
lemma integrable.comp_mul_left {f : G → F} [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (hf : integrable f μ)
(g : G) : integrable (λ t, f (g * t)) μ :=
(hf.mono_measure (map_mul_left_eq_self μ g).le).comp_measurable $ measurable_const_mul g
@[to_additive]
lemma integrable.comp_mul_right {f : G → F} [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (hf : integrable f μ)
(g : G) : integrable (λ t, f (t * g)) μ :=
(hf.mono_measure (map_mul_right_eq_self μ g).le).comp_measurable $ measurable_mul_const g
@[to_additive]
lemma integrable.comp_div_right {f : G → F} [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (hf : integrable f μ)
(g : G) : integrable (λ t, f (t / g)) μ :=
by { simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv], exact hf.comp_mul_right g⁻¹ }
variables [has_measurable_inv G]
@[to_additive]
lemma integrable.comp_div_left {f : G → F}
[is_inv_invariant μ] [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (hf : integrable f μ) (g : G) :
integrable (λ t, f (g / t)) μ :=
begin
rw [← map_mul_right_inv_eq_self μ g⁻¹, integrable_map_measure, function.comp],
{ simp_rw [div_inv_eq_mul, mul_inv_cancel_left], exact hf },
{ refine ae_strongly_measurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_id.const_div g),
simp_rw [map_map (measurable_id'.const_div g) (measurable_id'.const_mul g⁻¹).inv,
function.comp, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_inv_cancel_left, map_id'],
exact hf.ae_strongly_measurable },
{ exact (measurable_id'.const_mul g⁻¹).inv.ae_measurable }
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma integrable_comp_div_left (f : G → F)
[is_inv_invariant μ] [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (g : G) :
integrable (λ t, f (g / t)) μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, h.comp_div_left g⟩,
convert h.comp_inv.comp_mul_left g⁻¹,
simp_rw [div_inv_eq_mul, mul_inv_cancel_left]
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma integral_div_left_eq_self (f : G → E) (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ]
[is_mul_left_invariant μ] (x' : G) : ∫ x, f (x' / x) ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, integral_inv_eq_self (λ x, f (x' * x)) μ,
integral_mul_left_eq_self f x']
end measurable_mul
section smul
variables [group G] [measurable_space α] [mul_action G α] [has_measurable_smul G α]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma integral_smul_eq_self {μ : measure α} [smul_invariant_measure G α μ] (f : α → E) {g : G} :
∫ x, f (g • x) ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
have h : measurable_embedding (λ x : α, g • x) :=
(measurable_equiv.smul g).measurable_embedding,
rw [← h.integral_map, map_smul]
end
end smul
section topological_group
variables [topological_space G] [group G] [topological_group G] [borel_space G]
[is_mul_left_invariant μ]
/-- For nonzero regular left invariant measures, the integral of a continuous nonnegative function
`f` is 0 iff `f` is 0. -/
@[to_additive "For nonzero regular left invariant measures, the integral of a continuous nonnegative
function `f` is 0 iff `f` is 0."]
lemma lintegral_eq_zero_of_is_mul_left_invariant [regular μ] (hμ : μ ≠ 0)
{f : G → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : continuous f) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
begin
haveI := is_open_pos_measure_of_mul_left_invariant_of_regular hμ,
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.measurable, hf.ae_eq_iff_eq μ continuous_zero]
end
end topological_group
end measure_theory
|
08283b6675de6683280bd3f7d9eefeae51bebba7 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Lean/Elab/InfoTree.lean | 0e84967de2c2800a82aaa8869cf177759a9c9b8f | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,245 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Wojciech Nawrocki. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wojciech Nawrocki, Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Data.Position
import Lean.Expr
import Lean.Message
import Lean.Data.Json
import Lean.Meta.Basic
import Lean.Meta.PPGoal
namespace Lean.Elab
open Std (PersistentArray PersistentArray.empty PersistentHashMap)
/- Context after executing `liftTermElabM`.
Note that the term information collected during elaboration may contain metavariables, and their
assignments are stored at `mctx`. -/
structure ContextInfo where
env : Environment
fileMap : FileMap
mctx : MetavarContext := {}
options : Options := {}
currNamespace : Name := Name.anonymous
openDecls : List OpenDecl := []
deriving Inhabited
/-- An elaboration step -/
structure ElabInfo where
elaborator : Name
stx : Syntax
deriving Inhabited
structure TermInfo extends ElabInfo where
lctx : LocalContext -- The local context when the term was elaborated.
expectedType? : Option Expr
expr : Expr
isBinder : Bool := false
deriving Inhabited
structure CommandInfo extends ElabInfo where
deriving Inhabited
inductive CompletionInfo where
| dot (termInfo : TermInfo) (field? : Option Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr)
| id (stx : Syntax) (id : Name) (danglingDot : Bool) (lctx : LocalContext) (expectedType? : Option Expr)
| namespaceId (stx : Syntax)
| option (stx : Syntax)
| endSection (stx : Syntax) (scopeNames : List String)
| tactic (stx : Syntax) (goals : List MVarId)
-- TODO `import`
def CompletionInfo.stx : CompletionInfo → Syntax
| dot i .. => i.stx
| id stx .. => stx
| namespaceId stx => stx
| option stx => stx
| endSection stx .. => stx
| tactic stx .. => stx
structure FieldInfo where
/-- Name of the projection. -/
projName : Name
/-- Name of the field as written. -/
fieldName : Name
lctx : LocalContext
val : Expr
stx : Syntax
deriving Inhabited
/- We store the list of goals before and after the execution of a tactic.
We also store the metavariable context at each time since, we want to unassigned metavariables
at tactic execution time to be displayed as `?m...`. -/
structure TacticInfo extends ElabInfo where
mctxBefore : MetavarContext
goalsBefore : List MVarId
mctxAfter : MetavarContext
goalsAfter : List MVarId
deriving Inhabited
structure MacroExpansionInfo where
lctx : LocalContext -- The local context when the macro was expanded.
stx : Syntax
output : Syntax
deriving Inhabited
inductive Info where
| ofTacticInfo (i : TacticInfo)
| ofTermInfo (i : TermInfo)
| ofCommandInfo (i : CommandInfo)
| ofMacroExpansionInfo (i : MacroExpansionInfo)
| ofFieldInfo (i : FieldInfo)
| ofCompletionInfo (i : CompletionInfo)
deriving Inhabited
inductive InfoTree where
| context (i : ContextInfo) (t : InfoTree) -- The context object is created by `liftTermElabM` at `Command.lean`
| node (i : Info) (children : PersistentArray InfoTree) -- The children contains information for nested term elaboration and tactic evaluation
| ofJson (j : Json) -- For user data
| hole (mvarId : MVarId) -- The elaborator creates holes (aka metavariables) for tactics and postponed terms
deriving Inhabited
partial def InfoTree.findInfo? (p : Info → Bool) (t : InfoTree) : Option Info :=
match t with
| context _ t => findInfo? p t
| node i ts =>
if p i then
some i
else
ts.findSome? (findInfo? p)
| _ => none
structure InfoState where
enabled : Bool := false
assignment : PersistentHashMap MVarId InfoTree := {} -- map from holeId to InfoTree
trees : PersistentArray InfoTree := {}
deriving Inhabited
class MonadInfoTree (m : Type → Type) where
getInfoState : m InfoState
modifyInfoState : (InfoState → InfoState) → m Unit
export MonadInfoTree (getInfoState modifyInfoState)
instance [MonadLift m n] [MonadInfoTree m] : MonadInfoTree n where
getInfoState := liftM (getInfoState : m _)
modifyInfoState f := liftM (modifyInfoState f : m _)
partial def InfoTree.substitute (tree : InfoTree) (assignment : PersistentHashMap MVarId InfoTree) : InfoTree :=
match tree with
| node i c => node i <| c.map (substitute · assignment)
| context i t => context i (substitute t assignment)
| ofJson j => ofJson j
| hole id => match assignment.find? id with
| none => hole id
| some tree => substitute tree assignment
def ContextInfo.runMetaM (info : ContextInfo) (lctx : LocalContext) (x : MetaM α) : IO α := do
let x := x.run { lctx := lctx } { mctx := info.mctx }
let ((a, _), _) ← x.toIO { options := info.options, currNamespace := info.currNamespace, openDecls := info.openDecls } { env := info.env }
return a
def ContextInfo.toPPContext (info : ContextInfo) (lctx : LocalContext) : PPContext :=
{ env := info.env, mctx := info.mctx, lctx := lctx,
opts := info.options, currNamespace := info.currNamespace, openDecls := info.openDecls }
def ContextInfo.ppSyntax (info : ContextInfo) (lctx : LocalContext) (stx : Syntax) : IO Format := do
ppTerm (info.toPPContext lctx) stx
private def formatStxRange (ctx : ContextInfo) (stx : Syntax) : Format :=
let pos := stx.getPos?.getD 0
let endPos := stx.getTailPos?.getD pos
f!"{fmtPos pos stx.getHeadInfo}-{fmtPos endPos stx.getTailInfo}"
where fmtPos pos info :=
let pos := format <| ctx.fileMap.toPosition pos
match info with
| SourceInfo.original .. => pos
| _ => f!"{pos}†"
private def formatElabInfo (ctx : ContextInfo) (info : ElabInfo) : Format :=
if info.elaborator.isAnonymous then
formatStxRange ctx info.stx
else
f!"{formatStxRange ctx info.stx} @ {info.elaborator}"
def TermInfo.runMetaM (info : TermInfo) (ctx : ContextInfo) (x : MetaM α) : IO α :=
ctx.runMetaM info.lctx x
def TermInfo.format (ctx : ContextInfo) (info : TermInfo) : IO Format := do
info.runMetaM ctx do
try
return f!"{← Meta.ppExpr info.expr} : {← Meta.ppExpr (← Meta.inferType info.expr)} @ {formatElabInfo ctx info.toElabInfo}"
catch _ =>
return f!"{← Meta.ppExpr info.expr} : <failed-to-infer-type> @ {formatElabInfo ctx info.toElabInfo}"
def CompletionInfo.format (ctx : ContextInfo) (info : CompletionInfo) : IO Format :=
match info with
| CompletionInfo.dot i (expectedType? := expectedType?) .. => return f!"[.] {← i.format ctx} : {expectedType?}"
| CompletionInfo.id stx _ _ lctx expectedType? => ctx.runMetaM lctx do return f!"[.] {stx} : {expectedType?} @ {formatStxRange ctx info.stx}"
| _ => return f!"[.] {info.stx} @ {formatStxRange ctx info.stx}"
def CommandInfo.format (ctx : ContextInfo) (info : CommandInfo) : IO Format := do
return f!"command @ {formatElabInfo ctx info.toElabInfo}"
def FieldInfo.format (ctx : ContextInfo) (info : FieldInfo) : IO Format := do
ctx.runMetaM info.lctx do
return f!"{info.fieldName} : {← Meta.ppExpr (← Meta.inferType info.val)} := {← Meta.ppExpr info.val} @ {formatStxRange ctx info.stx}"
def ContextInfo.ppGoals (ctx : ContextInfo) (goals : List MVarId) : IO Format :=
if goals.isEmpty then
return "no goals"
else
ctx.runMetaM {} (return Std.Format.prefixJoin "\n" (← goals.mapM (Meta.ppGoal .)))
def TacticInfo.format (ctx : ContextInfo) (info : TacticInfo) : IO Format := do
let ctxB := { ctx with mctx := info.mctxBefore }
let ctxA := { ctx with mctx := info.mctxAfter }
let goalsBefore ← ctxB.ppGoals info.goalsBefore
let goalsAfter ← ctxA.ppGoals info.goalsAfter
return f!"Tactic @ {formatElabInfo ctx info.toElabInfo}\n{info.stx}\nbefore {goalsBefore}\nafter {goalsAfter}"
def MacroExpansionInfo.format (ctx : ContextInfo) (info : MacroExpansionInfo) : IO Format := do
let stx ← ctx.ppSyntax info.lctx info.stx
let output ← ctx.ppSyntax info.lctx info.output
return f!"Macro expansion\n{stx}\n===>\n{output}"
def Info.format (ctx : ContextInfo) : Info → IO Format
| ofTacticInfo i => i.format ctx
| ofTermInfo i => i.format ctx
| ofCommandInfo i => i.format ctx
| ofMacroExpansionInfo i => i.format ctx
| ofFieldInfo i => i.format ctx
| ofCompletionInfo i => i.format ctx
def Info.toElabInfo? : Info → Option ElabInfo
| ofTacticInfo i => some i.toElabInfo
| ofTermInfo i => some i.toElabInfo
| ofCommandInfo i => some i.toElabInfo
| ofMacroExpansionInfo i => none
| ofFieldInfo i => none
| ofCompletionInfo i => none
/--
Helper function for propagating the tactic metavariable context to its children nodes.
We need this function because we preserve `TacticInfo` nodes during backtracking *and* their
children. Moreover, we backtrack the metavariable context to undo metavariable assignments.
`TacticInfo` nodes save the metavariable context before/after the tactic application, and
can be pretty printed without any extra information. This is not the case for `TermInfo` nodes.
Without this function, the formatting method would often fail when processing `TermInfo` nodes
that are children of `TacticInfo` nodes that have been preserved during backtracking.
Saving the metavariable context at `TermInfo` nodes is also not a good option because
at `TermInfo` creation time, the metavariable context often miss information, e.g.,
a TC problem has not been resolved, a postponed subterm has not been elaborated, etc.
See `Term.SavedState.restore`.
-/
def Info.updateContext? : Option ContextInfo → Info → Option ContextInfo
| some ctx, ofTacticInfo i => some { ctx with mctx := i.mctxAfter }
| ctx?, _ => ctx?
partial def InfoTree.format (tree : InfoTree) (ctx? : Option ContextInfo := none) : IO Format := do
match tree with
| ofJson j => return toString j
| hole id => return toString id.name
| context i t => format t i
| node i cs => match ctx? with
| none => return "<context-not-available>"
| some ctx =>
let fmt ← i.format ctx
if cs.size == 0 then
return fmt
else
let ctx? := i.updateContext? ctx?
return f!"{fmt}{Std.Format.nestD <| Std.Format.prefixJoin (Std.format "\n") (← cs.toList.mapM fun c => format c ctx?)}"
section
variable [Monad m] [MonadInfoTree m]
@[inline] private def modifyInfoTrees (f : PersistentArray InfoTree → PersistentArray InfoTree) : m Unit :=
modifyInfoState fun s => { s with trees := f s.trees }
def getResetInfoTrees : m (PersistentArray InfoTree) := do
let trees := (← getInfoState).trees
modifyInfoTrees fun _ => {}
return trees
def pushInfoTree (t : InfoTree) : m Unit := do
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
modifyInfoTrees fun ts => ts.push t
def pushInfoLeaf (t : Info) : m Unit := do
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
pushInfoTree <| InfoTree.node (children := {}) t
def addCompletionInfo (info : CompletionInfo) : m Unit := do
pushInfoLeaf <| Info.ofCompletionInfo info
def resolveGlobalConstNoOverloadWithInfo [MonadResolveName m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadError m] (id : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr := none) : m Name := do
let n ← resolveGlobalConstNoOverload id
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
-- we do not store a specific elaborator since identifiers are special-cased by the server anyway
pushInfoLeaf <| Info.ofTermInfo { elaborator := Name.anonymous, lctx := LocalContext.empty, expr := (← mkConstWithLevelParams n), stx := id, expectedType? }
return n
def resolveGlobalConstWithInfos [MonadResolveName m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadError m] (id : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr := none) : m (List Name) := do
let ns ← resolveGlobalConst id
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
for n in ns do
pushInfoLeaf <| Info.ofTermInfo { elaborator := Name.anonymous, lctx := LocalContext.empty, expr := (← mkConstWithLevelParams n), stx := id, expectedType? }
return ns
def withInfoContext' [MonadFinally m] (x : m α) (mkInfo : α → m (Sum Info MVarId)) : m α := do
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
let treesSaved ← getResetInfoTrees
Prod.fst <$> MonadFinally.tryFinally' x fun a? => do
match a? with
| none => modifyInfoTrees fun _ => treesSaved
| some a =>
let info ← mkInfo a
modifyInfoTrees fun trees =>
match info with
| Sum.inl info => treesSaved.push <| InfoTree.node info trees
| Sum.inr mvaId => treesSaved.push <| InfoTree.hole mvaId
else
x
def withInfoTreeContext [MonadFinally m] (x : m α) (mkInfoTree : PersistentArray InfoTree → m InfoTree) : m α := do
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
let treesSaved ← getResetInfoTrees
Prod.fst <$> MonadFinally.tryFinally' x fun _ => do
let st ← getInfoState
let tree ← mkInfoTree st.trees
modifyInfoTrees fun _ => treesSaved.push tree
else
x
@[inline] def withInfoContext [MonadFinally m] (x : m α) (mkInfo : m Info) : m α := do
withInfoTreeContext x (fun trees => do return InfoTree.node (← mkInfo) trees)
def withSaveInfoContext [MonadFinally m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadOptions m] [MonadMCtx m] [MonadResolveName m] [MonadFileMap m] (x : m α) : m α := do
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
let treesSaved ← getResetInfoTrees
Prod.fst <$> MonadFinally.tryFinally' x fun _ => do
let st ← getInfoState
let trees ← st.trees.mapM fun tree => do
let tree := tree.substitute st.assignment
InfoTree.context {
env := (← getEnv), fileMap := (← getFileMap), mctx := (← getMCtx), currNamespace := (← getCurrNamespace), openDecls := (← getOpenDecls), options := (← getOptions)
} tree
modifyInfoTrees fun _ => treesSaved ++ trees
else
x
def getInfoHoleIdAssignment? (mvarId : MVarId) : m (Option InfoTree) :=
return (← getInfoState).assignment[mvarId]
def assignInfoHoleId (mvarId : MVarId) (infoTree : InfoTree) : m Unit := do
assert! (← getInfoHoleIdAssignment? mvarId).isNone
modifyInfoState fun s => { s with assignment := s.assignment.insert mvarId infoTree }
end
def withMacroExpansionInfo [MonadFinally m] [Monad m] [MonadInfoTree m] [MonadLCtx m] (stx output : Syntax) (x : m α) : m α :=
let mkInfo : m Info := do
return Info.ofMacroExpansionInfo {
lctx := (← getLCtx)
stx, output
}
withInfoContext x mkInfo
@[inline] def withInfoHole [MonadFinally m] [Monad m] [MonadInfoTree m] (mvarId : MVarId) (x : m α) : m α := do
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
let treesSaved ← getResetInfoTrees
Prod.fst <$> MonadFinally.tryFinally' x fun a? => modifyInfoState fun s =>
if s.trees.size > 0 then
{ s with trees := treesSaved, assignment := s.assignment.insert mvarId s.trees[s.trees.size - 1] }
else
{ s with trees := treesSaved }
else
x
def enableInfoTree [MonadInfoTree m] (flag := true) : m Unit :=
modifyInfoState fun s => { s with enabled := flag }
def getInfoTrees [MonadInfoTree m] [Monad m] : m (PersistentArray InfoTree) :=
return (← getInfoState).trees
end Lean.Elab
|
1a83f71d7723c21f75b0c8932fb5c83734a95b53 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/category_theory/functor/currying.lean | 26a95ef824fa72f0f065bac21f81b0ef9732ab3f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,017 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.products.bifunctor
/-!
# Curry and uncurry, as functors.
We define `curry : ((C × D) ⥤ E) ⥤ (C ⥤ (D ⥤ E))` and `uncurry : (C ⥤ (D ⥤ E)) ⥤ ((C × D) ⥤ E)`,
and verify that they provide an equivalence of categories
`currying : (C ⥤ (D ⥤ E)) ≌ ((C × D) ⥤ E)`.
-/
namespace category_theory
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variables {B : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} B]
{C : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} C]
{D : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} D]
{E : Type u₄} [category.{v₄} E]
/--
The uncurrying functor, taking a functor `C ⥤ (D ⥤ E)` and producing a functor `(C × D) ⥤ E`.
-/
@[simps]
def uncurry : (C ⥤ (D ⥤ E)) ⥤ ((C × D) ⥤ E) :=
{ obj := λ F,
{ obj := λ X, (F.obj X.1).obj X.2,
map := λ X Y f, (F.map f.1).app X.2 ≫ (F.obj Y.1).map f.2,
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g,
begin
simp only [prod_comp_fst, prod_comp_snd, functor.map_comp,
nat_trans.comp_app, category.assoc],
slice_lhs 2 3 { rw ← nat_trans.naturality },
rw category.assoc,
end },
map := λ F G T,
{ app := λ X, (T.app X.1).app X.2,
naturality' := λ X Y f,
begin
simp only [prod_comp_fst, prod_comp_snd, category.comp_id, category.assoc,
functor.map_id, functor.map_comp, nat_trans.id_app, nat_trans.comp_app],
slice_lhs 2 3 { rw nat_trans.naturality },
slice_lhs 1 2 { rw [←nat_trans.comp_app, nat_trans.naturality, nat_trans.comp_app] },
rw category.assoc,
end } }.
/--
The object level part of the currying functor. (See `curry` for the functorial version.)
-/
def curry_obj (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) : C ⥤ (D ⥤ E) :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ obj := λ Y, F.obj (X, Y),
map := λ Y Y' g, F.map (𝟙 X, g) },
map := λ X X' f, { app := λ Y, F.map (f, 𝟙 Y) } }
/--
The currying functor, taking a functor `(C × D) ⥤ E` and producing a functor `C ⥤ (D ⥤ E)`.
-/
@[simps obj_obj_obj obj_obj_map obj_map_app map_app_app]
def curry : ((C × D) ⥤ E) ⥤ (C ⥤ (D ⥤ E)) :=
{ obj := λ F, curry_obj F,
map := λ F G T,
{ app := λ X,
{ app := λ Y, T.app (X, Y),
naturality' := λ Y Y' g,
begin
dsimp [curry_obj],
rw nat_trans.naturality,
end },
naturality' := λ X X' f,
begin
ext, dsimp [curry_obj],
rw nat_trans.naturality,
end } }.
/--
The equivalence of functor categories given by currying/uncurrying.
-/
@[simps] -- create projection simp lemmas even though this isn't a `{ .. }`.
def currying : (C ⥤ (D ⥤ E)) ≌ ((C × D) ⥤ E) :=
equivalence.mk uncurry curry
(nat_iso.of_components (λ F, nat_iso.of_components
(λ X, nat_iso.of_components (λ Y, iso.refl _) (by tidy)) (by tidy)) (by tidy))
(nat_iso.of_components (λ F, nat_iso.of_components
(λ X, eq_to_iso (by simp)) (by tidy)) (by tidy))
/-- `F.flip` is isomorphic to uncurrying `F`, swapping the variables, and currying. -/
@[simps]
def flip_iso_curry_swap_uncurry (F : C ⥤ D ⥤ E) :
F.flip ≅ curry.obj (prod.swap _ _ ⋙ uncurry.obj F) :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ d, nat_iso.of_components (λ c, iso.refl _) (by tidy)) (by tidy)
/-- The uncurrying of `F.flip` is isomorphic to
swapping the factors followed by the uncurrying of `F`. -/
@[simps]
def uncurry_obj_flip (F : C ⥤ D ⥤ E) : uncurry.obj F.flip ≅ prod.swap _ _ ⋙ uncurry.obj F :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ p, iso.refl _) (by tidy)
variables (B C D E)
/--
A version of `category_theory.whiskering_right` for bifunctors, obtained by uncurrying,
applying `whiskering_right` and currying back
-/
@[simps] def whiskering_right₂ : (C ⥤ D ⥤ E) ⥤ ((B ⥤ C) ⥤ (B ⥤ D) ⥤ (B ⥤ E)) :=
uncurry ⋙ (whiskering_right _ _ _) ⋙
((whiskering_left _ _ _).obj (prod_functor_to_functor_prod _ _ _)) ⋙ curry
end category_theory
|
e405bc3677ee5cd8c4dfed20126a65511ecc33b3 | 5ee26964f602030578ef0159d46145dd2e357ba5 | /src/for_mathlib/sheaves/presheaf.lean | f8401c44654dbec2df3db4ff4185ae1dadadc997 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/lean-perfectoid-spaces | 569b4006fdfe491ca8b58dd817bb56138ada761f | 06cec51438b168837fc6e9268945735037fd1db6 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,154,571,918 | 1,557,685,392,000 | 1,557,685,392,000 | 186,363,547 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,557,730,933,000 | 1,557,730,933,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,930 | lean | /-
Presheaf (of types).
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/006D
Author: Ramon Fernandez Mir
-/
import topology.basic
import topology.opens
universes u v
-- Definition of a presheaf.
open topological_space lattice
structure presheaf (α : Type u) [topological_space α] :=
(F : opens α → Type v)
(res : ∀ (U V) (HVU : V ⊆ U), F U → F V)
(Hid : ∀ (U), res U U (set.subset.refl U) = id)
(Hcomp : ∀ (U V W) (HWV : W ⊆ V) (HVU : V ⊆ U),
res U W (set.subset.trans HWV HVU) = res V W HWV ∘ res U V HVU)
namespace presheaf
variables {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (presheaf α) :=
{ F := λ _, opens α → Type v,
coe := presheaf.F }
-- Simplification lemmas for Hid and Hcomp.
@[simp] lemma Hcomp' (F : presheaf α) :
∀ (U V W) (HWV : W ⊆ V) (HVU : V ⊆ U) (s : F U),
(F.res U W (set.subset.trans HWV HVU)) s =
(F.res V W HWV) ((F.res U V HVU) s) :=
λ U V W HWV HVU s, by rw F.Hcomp U V W HWV HVU
@[simp] lemma Hid' (F : presheaf α) :
∀ (U) (s : F U),
(F.res U U (set.subset.refl U)) s = s :=
λ U s, by rw F.Hid U; simp
-- Morphism of presheaves.
structure morphism (F G : presheaf α) :=
(map : ∀ (U), F U → G U)
(commutes : ∀ (U V) (HVU : V ⊆ U),
(G.res U V HVU) ∘ (map U) = (map V) ∘ (F.res U V HVU))
infix `⟶`:80 := morphism
section morphism
def comp {F G H : presheaf α} (fg : F ⟶ G) (gh : G ⟶ H) : F ⟶ H :=
{ map := λ U, gh.map U ∘ fg.map U,
commutes := λ U V HVU,
begin
rw [←function.comp.assoc, gh.commutes U V HVU], symmetry,
rw [function.comp.assoc, ←fg.commutes U V HVU]
end }
infix `⊚`:80 := comp
def id (F : presheaf α) : F ⟶ F :=
{ map := λ U, id,
commutes := λ U V HVU, by simp, }
structure iso (F G : presheaf α) :=
(mor : F ⟶ G)
(inv : G ⟶ F)
(mor_inv_id : mor ⊚ inv = id F)
(inv_mor_id : inv ⊚ mor = id G)
end morphism
end presheaf
|
e2fe4ba0b5a9bacb5104b7361c1b765d7b5a5dd8 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/qpf/multivariate/constructions/sigma.lean | 98bc5f1c1ace79ced8d4206bbfd119099d8edb79 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,034 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import data.pfunctor.multivariate.basic
import data.qpf.multivariate.basic
/-!
# Dependent product and sum of QPFs are QPFs
-/
universes u
namespace mvqpf
open_locale mvfunctor
variables {n : ℕ} {A : Type u}
variables (F : A → typevec.{u} n → Type u)
/-- Dependent sum of of an `n`-ary functor. The sum can range over
data types like `ℕ` or over `Type.{u-1}` -/
def sigma (v : typevec.{u} n) : Type.{u} :=
Σ α : A, F α v
/-- Dependent product of of an `n`-ary functor. The sum can range over
data types like `ℕ` or over `Type.{u-1}` -/
def pi (v : typevec.{u} n) : Type.{u} :=
Π α : A, F α v
instance sigma.inhabited {α} [inhabited A] [inhabited (F default α)] : inhabited (sigma F α) :=
⟨ ⟨default, default⟩ ⟩
instance pi.inhabited {α} [Π a, inhabited (F a α)] : inhabited (pi F α) :=
⟨ λ a, default ⟩
variables [Π α, mvfunctor $ F α]
namespace sigma
instance : mvfunctor (sigma F) :=
{ map := λ α β f ⟨a,x⟩, ⟨a,f <$$> x⟩ }
variables [Π α, mvqpf $ F α]
/-- polynomial functor representation of a dependent sum -/
protected def P : mvpfunctor n :=
⟨ Σ a, (P (F a)).A, λ x, (P (F x.1)).B x.2 ⟩
/-- abstraction function for dependent sums -/
protected def abs ⦃α⦄ : (sigma.P F).obj α → sigma F α
| ⟨a,f⟩ := ⟨ a.1, mvqpf.abs ⟨a.2, f⟩ ⟩
/-- representation function for dependent sums -/
protected def repr ⦃α⦄ : sigma F α → (sigma.P F).obj α
| ⟨a,f⟩ :=
let x := mvqpf.repr f in
⟨ ⟨a,x.1⟩, x.2 ⟩
instance : mvqpf (sigma F) :=
{ P := sigma.P F,
abs := sigma.abs F,
repr := sigma.repr F,
abs_repr := by rintros α ⟨x,f⟩; simp [sigma.repr,sigma.abs,abs_repr],
abs_map := by rintros α β f ⟨x,g⟩; simp [sigma.abs,mvpfunctor.map_eq];
simp [(<$$>),mvfunctor._match_1,← abs_map,← mvpfunctor.map_eq] }
end sigma
namespace pi
instance : mvfunctor (pi F) :=
{ map := λ α β f x a, f <$$> x a }
variables [Π α, mvqpf $ F α]
/-- polynomial functor representation of a dependent product -/
protected def P : mvpfunctor n :=
⟨ Π a, (P (F a)).A, λ x i, Σ a : A, (P (F a)).B (x a) i ⟩
/-- abstraction function for dependent products -/
protected def abs ⦃α⦄ : (pi.P F).obj α → pi F α
| ⟨a,f⟩ := λ x, mvqpf.abs ⟨a x, λ i y, f i ⟨_,y⟩⟩
/-- representation function for dependent products -/
protected def repr ⦃α⦄ : pi F α → (pi.P F).obj α
| f :=
⟨ λ a, (mvqpf.repr (f a)).1, λ i a, (@mvqpf.repr _ _ _ (_inst_2 _) _ (f _)).2 _ a.2 ⟩
instance : mvqpf (pi F) :=
{ P := pi.P F,
abs := pi.abs F,
repr := pi.repr F,
abs_repr := by rintros α f; ext; simp [pi.repr,pi.abs,abs_repr],
abs_map := by rintros α β f ⟨x,g⟩; simp only [pi.abs, mvpfunctor.map_eq]; ext;
simp only [(<$$>)];
simp only [←abs_map, mvpfunctor.map_eq]; refl }
end pi
end mvqpf
|
9fcb8525bd9c8ea9a4cbedf778fc9216af8a69d4 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/get_free_var_range.lean | 4174e3d7d8db8f204899d484cd83b53ff5d22d0f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 262 | lean | -- should be 0
#eval expr.get_free_var_range `(Type)
-- should be 2
#eval expr.get_free_var_range (expr.lam `hello binder_info.default `(Type) $ expr.app (expr.var 1) (expr.var 2))
-- should be 3
#eval expr.get_free_var_range (expr.app (expr.var 1) (expr.var 2)) |
164d0bbe85965b7280fded35f66c65a682c0021b | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/group_theory/perm/sign.lean | ccc3f63400670ff72c82dd203eb170c252a8299c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,962 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.fintype
universes u v
open equiv function fintype finset
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace equiv.perm
def subtype_perm (f : perm α) {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x ↔ p (f x)) : perm {x // p x} :=
⟨λ x, ⟨f x, (h _).1 x.2⟩, λ x, ⟨f⁻¹ x, (h (f⁻¹ x)).2 $ by simpa using x.2⟩,
λ _, by simp, λ _, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma subtype_perm_one (p : α → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p x ↔ p ((1 : perm α) x)) : @subtype_perm α 1 p h = 1 :=
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ ⟨_, _⟩, rfl
def of_subtype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (f : perm (subtype p)) : perm α :=
⟨λ x, if h : p x then f ⟨x, h⟩ else x, λ x, if h : p x then f⁻¹ ⟨x, h⟩ else x,
λ x, have h : ∀ h : p x, p (f ⟨x, h⟩), from λ h, (f ⟨x, h⟩).2,
by simp; split_ifs at *; simp * at *,
λ x, have h : ∀ h : p x, p (f⁻¹ ⟨x, h⟩), from λ h, (f⁻¹ ⟨x, h⟩).2,
by simp; split_ifs at *; simp * at *⟩
instance of_subtype.is_group_hom {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] : is_group_hom (@of_subtype α p _) :=
{ map_mul := λ f g, equiv.ext _ _ $ λ x, begin
rw [of_subtype, of_subtype, of_subtype],
by_cases h : p x,
{ have h₁ : p (f (g ⟨x, h⟩)), from (f (g ⟨x, h⟩)).2,
have h₂ : p (g ⟨x, h⟩), from (g ⟨x, h⟩).2,
simp [h, h₁, h₂] },
{ simp [h] }
end }
@[simp] lemma of_subtype_one (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : @of_subtype α p _ 1 = 1 :=
is_group_hom.map_one of_subtype
lemma eq_inv_iff_eq {f : perm α} {x y : α} : x = f⁻¹ y ↔ f x = y :=
by conv {to_lhs, rw [← injective.eq_iff f.injective, apply_inv_self]}
lemma inv_eq_iff_eq {f : perm α} {x y : α} : f⁻¹ x = y ↔ x = f y :=
by rw [eq_comm, eq_inv_iff_eq, eq_comm]
def disjoint (f g : perm α) := ∀ x, f x = x ∨ g x = x
@[symm] lemma disjoint.symm {f g : perm α} : disjoint f g → disjoint g f :=
by simp [disjoint, or.comm]
lemma disjoint_comm {f g : perm α} : disjoint f g ↔ disjoint g f :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
lemma disjoint_mul_comm {f g : perm α} (h : disjoint f g) : f * g = g * f :=
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ x, (h x).elim
(λ hf, (h (g x)).elim (λ hg, by simp [mul_apply, hf, hg])
(λ hg, by simp [mul_apply, hf, g.injective hg]))
(λ hg, (h (f x)).elim (λ hf, by simp [mul_apply, f.injective hf, hg])
(λ hf, by simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]))
@[simp] lemma disjoint_one_left (f : perm α) : disjoint 1 f := λ _, or.inl rfl
@[simp] lemma disjoint_one_right (f : perm α) : disjoint f 1 := λ _, or.inr rfl
lemma disjoint_mul_left {f g h : perm α} (H1 : disjoint f h) (H2 : disjoint g h) :
disjoint (f * g) h :=
λ x, by cases H1 x; cases H2 x; simp *
lemma disjoint_mul_right {f g h : perm α} (H1 : disjoint f g) (H2 : disjoint f h) :
disjoint f (g * h) :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_mul_left H1.symm H2.symm
lemma disjoint_prod_right {f : perm α} (l : list (perm α))
(h : ∀ g ∈ l, disjoint f g) : disjoint f l.prod :=
begin
induction l with g l ih,
{ exact disjoint_one_right _ },
{ rw list.prod_cons;
exact disjoint_mul_right (h _ (list.mem_cons_self _ _))
(ih (λ g hg, h g (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ hg))) }
end
lemma disjoint_prod_perm {l₁ l₂ : list (perm α)} (hl : l₁.pairwise disjoint)
(hp : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁.prod = l₂.prod :=
begin
induction hp,
{ refl },
{ rw [list.prod_cons, list.prod_cons, hp_ih (list.pairwise_cons.1 hl).2] },
{ simp [list.prod_cons, disjoint_mul_comm, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, *,
list.pairwise_cons] at * },
{ rw [hp_ih_a hl, hp_ih_a_1 ((list.perm_pairwise (λ x y (h : disjoint x y), disjoint.symm h) hp_a).1 hl)] }
end
lemma of_subtype_subtype_perm {f : perm α} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (h₁ : ∀ x, p x ↔ p (f x))
(h₂ : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → p x) : of_subtype (subtype_perm f h₁) = f :=
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ x, begin
rw [of_subtype, subtype_perm],
by_cases hx : p x,
{ simp [hx] },
{ haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
simp [hx, not_not.1 (mt (h₂ x) hx)] }
end
lemma of_subtype_apply_of_not_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (f : perm (subtype p)) {x : α} (hx : ¬ p x) :
of_subtype f x = x := dif_neg hx
lemma mem_iff_of_subtype_apply_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (f : perm (subtype p)) (x : α) :
p x ↔ p ((of_subtype f : α → α) x) :=
if h : p x then by dsimp [of_subtype]; simpa [h] using (f ⟨x, h⟩).2
else by simp [h, of_subtype_apply_of_not_mem f h]
@[simp] lemma subtype_perm_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (f : perm (subtype p)) :
subtype_perm (of_subtype f) (mem_iff_of_subtype_apply_mem f) = f :=
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, by dsimp [subtype_perm, of_subtype]; simp [show p x, from hx]
lemma pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {f : perm α} {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) :
∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, hfx, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self]
lemma gpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {f : perm α} {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) :
∀ n : ℤ, (f ^ n) x = x
| (n : ℕ) := pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n
| -[1+ n] := by rw [gpow_neg_succ, inv_eq_iff_eq, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx]
lemma pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {f : perm α} {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x ∨ (f ^ n) x = f x
| 0 := or.inl rfl
| (n+1) := (pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self n).elim
(λ h, or.inr (by rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, h]))
(λ h, or.inl (by rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, h, hffx]))
lemma gpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {f : perm α} {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = x ∨ (f ^ i) x = f x
| (n : ℕ) := pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n
| -[1+ n] :=
by rw [gpow_neg_succ, inv_eq_iff_eq, ← injective.eq_iff f.injective, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ,
eq_comm, inv_eq_iff_eq, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ', @eq_comm _ x, or.comm];
exact pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx _
variable [decidable_eq α]
def support [fintype α] (f : perm α) := univ.filter (λ x, f x ≠ x)
@[simp] lemma mem_support [fintype α] {f : perm α} {x : α} : x ∈ f.support ↔ f x ≠ x :=
by simp [support]
def is_swap (f : perm α) := ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ f = swap x y
lemma swap_mul_eq_mul_swap (f : perm α) (x y : α) : swap x y * f = f * swap (f⁻¹ x) (f⁻¹ y) :=
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ z, begin
simp [mul_apply, swap_apply_def],
split_ifs;
simp [*, eq_inv_iff_eq] at * <|> cc
end
lemma mul_swap_eq_swap_mul (f : perm α) (x y : α) : f * swap x y = swap (f x) (f y) * f :=
by rw [swap_mul_eq_mul_swap, inv_apply_self, inv_apply_self]
@[simp] lemma swap_mul_self (i j : α) : equiv.swap i j * equiv.swap i j = 1 :=
equiv.swap_swap i j
@[simp] lemma swap_swap_apply (i j k : α) : equiv.swap i j (equiv.swap i j k) = k :=
equiv.swap_core_swap_core k i j
lemma is_swap_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{f : perm (subtype p)} (h : is_swap f) : is_swap (of_subtype f) :=
let ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩, hxy⟩ := h in
⟨x, y, by simp at hxy; tauto,
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ z, begin
rw [hxy.2, of_subtype],
simp [swap_apply_def],
split_ifs;
cc <|> simp * at *
end⟩
lemma ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self {f : perm α} {x y : α}
(hy : (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y) : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x :=
begin
simp only [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, injective.eq_iff f.injective] at *,
by_cases h : f y = x,
{ split; intro; simp * at * },
{ split_ifs at hy; cc }
end
lemma support_swap_mul_eq [fintype α] {f : perm α} {x : α}
(hffx : f (f x) ≠ x) : (swap x (f x) * f).support = f.support.erase x :=
have hfx : f x ≠ x, from λ hfx, by simpa [hfx] using hffx,
finset.ext.2 $ λ y,
⟨λ hy, have hy' : (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y, from mem_support.1 hy,
mem_erase.2 ⟨λ hyx, by simp [hyx, mul_apply, *] at *,
mem_support.2 $ λ hfy,
by simp only [mul_apply, swap_apply_def, hfy] at hy';
split_ifs at hy'; simp * at *⟩,
λ hy, by simp only [mem_erase, mem_support, swap_apply_def, mul_apply] at *;
intro; split_ifs at *; simp * at *⟩
lemma card_support_swap_mul [fintype α] {f : perm α} {x : α}
(hx : f x ≠ x) : (swap x (f x) * f).support.card < f.support.card :=
finset.card_lt_card
⟨λ z hz, mem_support.2 (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self (mem_support.1 hz)).1,
λ h, absurd (h (mem_support.2 hx)) (mt mem_support.1 (by simp))⟩
def swap_factors_aux : Π (l : list α) (f : perm α), (∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) →
{l : list (perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, is_swap g}
| [] := λ f h, ⟨[], equiv.ext _ _ $ λ x, by rw [list.prod_nil];
exact eq.symm (not_not.1 (mt h (list.not_mem_nil _))), by simp⟩
| (x :: l) := λ f h,
if hfx : x = f x
then swap_factors_aux l f
(λ y hy, list.mem_of_ne_of_mem (λ h : y = x, by simpa [h, hfx.symm] using hy) (h hy))
else let m := swap_factors_aux l (swap x (f x) * f)
(λ y hy, have f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x, from ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy,
list.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h this.1)) in
⟨swap x (f x) :: m.1,
by rw [list.prod_cons, m.2.1, ← mul_assoc,
mul_def (swap x (f x)), swap_swap, ← one_def, one_mul],
λ g hg, ((list.mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 hg).elim (λ h, ⟨x, f x, hfx, h⟩) (m.2.2 _)⟩
/-- `swap_factors` represents a permutation as a product of a list of transpositions.
The representation is non unique and depends on the linear order structure.
For types without linear order `trunc_swap_factors` can be used -/
def swap_factors [fintype α] [decidable_linear_order α] (f : perm α) :
{l : list (perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, is_swap g} :=
swap_factors_aux ((@univ α _).sort (≤)) f (λ _ _, (mem_sort _).2 (mem_univ _))
def trunc_swap_factors [fintype α] (f : perm α) :
trunc {l : list (perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, is_swap g} :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton (@univ α _).1
(λ l h, trunc.mk (swap_factors_aux l f h))
(show ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ (@univ α _).1, from λ _ _, mem_univ _)
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma swap_induction_on [fintype α] {P : perm α → Prop} (f : perm α) :
P 1 → (∀ f x y, x ≠ y → P f → P (swap x y * f)) → P f :=
begin
cases trunc.out (trunc_swap_factors f) with l hl,
induction l with g l ih generalizing f,
{ simp [hl.1.symm] {contextual := tt} },
{ assume h1 hmul_swap,
rcases hl.2 g (by simp) with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩,
rw [← hl.1, list.prod_cons, hxy.2],
exact hmul_swap _ _ _ hxy.1 (ih _ ⟨rfl, λ v hv, hl.2 _ (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ hv)⟩ h1 hmul_swap) }
end
lemma swap_mul_swap_mul_swap {x y z : α} (hwz: x ≠ y) (hxz : x ≠ z) :
swap y z * swap x y * swap y z = swap z x :=
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ n, by simp only [swap_apply_def, mul_apply]; split_ifs; cc
lemma is_conj_swap {w x y z : α} (hwx : w ≠ x) (hyz : y ≠ z) : is_conj (swap w x) (swap y z) :=
have h : ∀ {y z : α}, y ≠ z → w ≠ z →
(swap w y * swap x z) * swap w x * (swap w y * swap x z)⁻¹ = swap y z :=
λ y z hyz hwz, by rw [mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, swap_inv, mul_assoc (swap w y),
mul_assoc (swap w y), ← mul_assoc _ (swap x z), swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwx hwz,
← mul_assoc, swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwz.symm hyz.symm],
if hwz : w = z
then have hwy : w ≠ y, by cc,
⟨swap w z * swap x y, by rw [swap_comm y z, h hyz.symm hwy]⟩
else ⟨swap w y * swap x z, h hyz hwz⟩
/-- set of all pairs (⟨a, b⟩ : Σ a : fin n, fin n) such that b < a -/
def fin_pairs_lt (n : ℕ) : finset (Σ a : fin n, fin n) :=
(univ : finset (fin n)).sigma (λ a, (range a.1).attach_fin
(λ m hm, lt_trans (mem_range.1 hm) a.2))
lemma mem_fin_pairs_lt {n : ℕ} {a : Σ a : fin n, fin n} :
a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n ↔ a.2 < a.1 :=
by simp [fin_pairs_lt, fin.lt_def]
def sign_aux {n : ℕ} (a : perm (fin n)) : units ℤ :=
(fin_pairs_lt n).prod (λ x, if a x.1 ≤ a x.2 then -1 else 1)
@[simp] lemma sign_aux_one (n : ℕ) : sign_aux (1 : perm (fin n)) = 1 :=
begin
unfold sign_aux,
conv { to_rhs, rw ← @finset.prod_const_one _ (units ℤ)
(fin_pairs_lt n) },
exact finset.prod_congr rfl (λ a ha, if_neg
(not_le_of_gt (mem_fin_pairs_lt.1 ha)))
end
def sign_bij_aux {n : ℕ} (f : perm (fin n)) (a : Σ a : fin n, fin n) :
Σ a : fin n, fin n :=
if hxa : f a.2 < f a.1 then ⟨f a.1, f a.2⟩ else ⟨f a.2, f a.1⟩
lemma sign_bij_aux_inj {n : ℕ} {f : perm (fin n)} : ∀ a b : Σ a : fin n, fin n,
a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n → b ∈ fin_pairs_lt n →
sign_bij_aux f a = sign_bij_aux f b → a = b :=
λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ ha hb h, begin
unfold sign_bij_aux at h,
rw mem_fin_pairs_lt at *,
have : ¬b₁ < b₂ := not_lt_of_ge (le_of_lt hb),
split_ifs at h;
simp [*, injective.eq_iff f.injective, sigma.mk.inj_eq] at *
end
lemma sign_bij_aux_surj {n : ℕ} {f : perm (fin n)} : ∀ a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n,
∃ b ∈ fin_pairs_lt n, a = sign_bij_aux f b :=
λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha,
if hxa : f⁻¹ a₂ < f⁻¹ a₁
then ⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₁, f⁻¹ a₂⟩, mem_fin_pairs_lt.2 hxa,
by dsimp [sign_bij_aux];
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, dif_pos (mem_fin_pairs_lt.1 ha)]⟩
else ⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₂, f⁻¹ a₁⟩, mem_fin_pairs_lt.2 $ lt_of_le_of_ne
(le_of_not_gt hxa) $ λ h,
by simpa [mem_fin_pairs_lt, (f⁻¹).injective h, lt_irrefl] using ha,
by dsimp [sign_bij_aux];
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
dif_neg (not_lt_of_ge (le_of_lt (mem_fin_pairs_lt.1 ha)))]⟩
lemma sign_bij_aux_mem {n : ℕ} {f : perm (fin n)}: ∀ a : Σ a : fin n, fin n,
a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n → sign_bij_aux f a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n :=
λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha, begin
unfold sign_bij_aux,
split_ifs with h,
{ exact mem_fin_pairs_lt.2 h },
{ exact mem_fin_pairs_lt.2
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_gt h)
(λ h, ne_of_lt (mem_fin_pairs_lt.1 ha) (f.injective h.symm))) }
end
@[simp] lemma sign_aux_inv {n : ℕ} (f : perm (fin n)) : sign_aux f⁻¹ = sign_aux f :=
prod_bij (λ a ha, sign_bij_aux f⁻¹ a)
sign_bij_aux_mem
(λ ⟨a, b⟩ hab, if h : f⁻¹ b < f⁻¹ a
then by rw [sign_bij_aux, dif_pos h, if_neg (not_le_of_gt h), apply_inv_self,
apply_inv_self, if_neg (not_le_of_gt $ mem_fin_pairs_lt.1 hab)]
else by rw [sign_bij_aux, if_pos (le_of_not_gt h), dif_neg h, apply_inv_self,
apply_inv_self, if_pos (le_of_lt $ mem_fin_pairs_lt.1 hab)])
sign_bij_aux_inj
sign_bij_aux_surj
lemma sign_aux_mul {n : ℕ} (f g : perm (fin n)) :
sign_aux (f * g) = sign_aux f * sign_aux g :=
begin
rw ← sign_aux_inv g,
unfold sign_aux,
rw ← prod_mul_distrib,
refine prod_bij (λ a ha, sign_bij_aux g a) sign_bij_aux_mem _
sign_bij_aux_inj sign_bij_aux_surj,
rintros ⟨a, b⟩ hab,
rw [sign_bij_aux, mul_apply, mul_apply],
rw mem_fin_pairs_lt at hab,
by_cases h : g b < g a,
{ rw dif_pos h,
simp [not_le_of_gt hab]; congr },
{ rw [dif_neg h, inv_apply_self, inv_apply_self, if_pos (le_of_lt hab)],
by_cases h₁ : f (g b) ≤ f (g a),
{ have : f (g b) ≠ f (g a),
{ rw [ne.def, injective.eq_iff f.injective,
injective.eq_iff g.injective];
exact ne_of_lt hab },
rw [if_pos h₁, if_neg (not_le_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_ne h₁ this))],
refl },
{ rw [if_neg h₁, if_pos (le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge h₁))],
refl } }
end
instance sign_aux.is_group_hom {n : ℕ} : is_group_hom (@sign_aux n) := { map_mul := sign_aux_mul }
private lemma sign_aux_swap_zero_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
sign_aux (swap (⟨0, lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hn⟩ : fin n)
⟨1, lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hn⟩) = -1 :=
let zero : fin n := ⟨0, lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hn⟩ in
let one : fin n := ⟨1, lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hn⟩ in
have hzo : zero < one := dec_trivial,
show _ = (finset.singleton (⟨one, zero⟩ : Σ a : fin n, fin n)).prod
(λ x : Σ a : fin n, fin n, if (equiv.swap zero one) x.1
≤ swap zero one x.2 then (-1 : units ℤ) else 1),
begin
refine eq.symm (prod_subset (λ ⟨x₁, x₂⟩, by simp [mem_fin_pairs_lt, hzo] {contextual := tt})
(λ a ha₁ ha₂, _)),
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩⟩,
replace ha₁ : a₂ < a₁ := mem_fin_pairs_lt.1 ha₁,
simp only [swap_apply_def],
have : ¬ 1 ≤ a₂ → a₂ = 0, from λ h, nat.le_zero_iff.1 (nat.le_of_lt_succ (lt_of_not_ge h)),
have : a₁ ≤ 1 → a₁ = 0 ∨ a₁ = 1, from nat.cases_on a₁ (λ _, or.inl rfl)
(λ a₁, nat.cases_on a₁ (λ _, or.inr rfl) (λ _ h, absurd h dec_trivial)),
split_ifs;
simp [*, lt_irrefl, -not_lt, not_le.symm, -not_le, le_refl, fin.lt_def, fin.le_def, nat.zero_le,
zero, one, iff.intro fin.veq_of_eq fin.eq_of_veq, nat.le_zero_iff] at *,
end
lemma sign_aux_swap : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x y : fin n} (hxy : x ≠ y),
sign_aux (swap x y) = -1
| 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 := dec_trivial
| (n+2) := λ x y hxy,
have h2n : 2 ≤ n + 2 := dec_trivial,
by rw [← is_conj_iff_eq, ← sign_aux_swap_zero_one h2n];
exact is_group_hom.is_conj _ (is_conj_swap hxy dec_trivial)
def sign_aux2 : list α → perm α → units ℤ
| [] f := 1
| (x::l) f := if x = f x then sign_aux2 l f else -sign_aux2 l (swap x (f x) * f)
lemma sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 {n : ℕ} : ∀ (l : list α) (f : perm α) (e : α ≃ fin n)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l), sign_aux ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) = sign_aux2 l f
| [] f e h := have f = 1, from equiv.ext _ _ $
λ y, not_not.1 (mt (h y) (list.not_mem_nil _)),
by rw [this, one_def, equiv.trans_refl, equiv.symm_trans, ← one_def,
sign_aux_one, sign_aux2]
| (x::l) f e h := begin
rw sign_aux2,
by_cases hfx : x = f x,
{ rw if_pos hfx,
exact sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 l f _ (λ y (hy : f y ≠ y), list.mem_of_ne_of_mem
(λ h : y = x, by simpa [h, hfx.symm] using hy) (h y hy) ) },
{ have hy : ∀ y : α, (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y → y ∈ l,
from λ y hy, have f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x, from ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy,
list.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h _ this.1),
have : (e.symm.trans (swap x (f x) * f)).trans e =
(swap (e x) (e (f x))) * (e.symm.trans f).trans e,
from equiv.ext _ _ (λ z, by rw ← equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans; simp [mul_def]),
have hefx : e x ≠ e (f x), from mt (injective.eq_iff e.injective).1 hfx,
rw [if_neg hfx, ← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ e hy, this, sign_aux_mul, sign_aux_swap hefx],
simp }
end
def sign_aux3 [fintype α] (f : perm α) {s : multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → units ℤ :=
quotient.hrec_on s (λ l h, sign_aux2 l f)
(trunc.induction_on (equiv_fin α)
(λ e l₁ l₂ h, function.hfunext
(show (∀ x, x ∈ l₁) = ∀ x, x ∈ l₂, by simp [list.mem_of_perm h])
(λ h₁ h₂ _, by rw [← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ e (λ _ _, h₁ _),
← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ e (λ _ _, h₂ _)])))
lemma sign_aux3_mul_and_swap [fintype α] (f g : perm α) (s : multiset α) (hs : ∀ x, x ∈ s) :
sign_aux3 (f * g) hs = sign_aux3 f hs * sign_aux3 g hs ∧ ∀ x y, x ≠ y →
sign_aux3 (swap x y) hs = -1 :=
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := quotient.exists_rep s in
let ⟨e, _⟩ := trunc.exists_rep (equiv_fin α) in
begin
clear _let_match _let_match,
subst hl,
show sign_aux2 l (f * g) = sign_aux2 l f * sign_aux2 l g ∧
∀ x y, x ≠ y → sign_aux2 l (swap x y) = -1,
have hfg : (e.symm.trans (f * g)).trans e = (e.symm.trans f).trans e * (e.symm.trans g).trans e,
from equiv.ext _ _ (λ h, by simp [mul_apply]),
split,
{ rw [← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ e (λ _ _, hs _), ← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ e (λ _ _, hs _),
← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ e (λ _ _, hs _), hfg, sign_aux_mul] },
{ assume x y hxy,
have hexy : e x ≠ e y, from mt (injective.eq_iff e.injective).1 hxy,
rw [← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ e (λ _ _, hs _), equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans, sign_aux_swap hexy] }
end
/-- `sign` of a permutation returns the signature or parity of a permutation, `1` for even
permutations, `-1` for odd permutations. It is the unique surjective group homomorphism from
`perm α` to the group with two elements.-/
def sign [fintype α] (f : perm α) := sign_aux3 f mem_univ
instance sign.is_group_hom [fintype α] : is_group_hom (@sign α _ _) :=
{ map_mul := λ f g, (sign_aux3_mul_and_swap f g _ mem_univ).1 }
section sign
variable [fintype α]
@[simp] lemma sign_mul (f g : perm α) : sign (f * g) = sign f * sign g :=
is_mul_hom.map_mul sign _ _
@[simp] lemma sign_one : (sign (1 : perm α)) = 1 :=
is_group_hom.map_one sign
@[simp] lemma sign_refl : sign (equiv.refl α) = 1 :=
is_group_hom.map_one sign
@[simp] lemma sign_inv (f : perm α) : sign f⁻¹ = sign f :=
by rw [is_group_hom.map_inv sign, int.units_inv_eq_self]; apply_instance
lemma sign_swap {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : sign (swap x y) = -1 :=
(sign_aux3_mul_and_swap 1 1 _ mem_univ).2 x y h
@[simp] lemma sign_swap' {x y : α} :
(swap x y).sign = if x = y then 1 else -1 :=
if H : x = y then by simp [H, swap_self] else
by simp [sign_swap H, H]
lemma sign_eq_of_is_swap {f : perm α} (h : is_swap f) : sign f = -1 :=
let ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := h in hxy.2.symm ▸ sign_swap hxy.1
lemma sign_aux3_symm_trans_trans [decidable_eq β] [fintype β] (f : perm α)
(e : α ≃ β) {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β} (hs : ∀ x, x ∈ s) (ht : ∀ x, x ∈ t) :
sign_aux3 ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) ht = sign_aux3 f hs :=
quotient.induction_on₂ t s
(λ l₁ l₂ h₁ h₂, show sign_aux2 _ _ = sign_aux2 _ _,
from let n := trunc.out (equiv_fin β) in
by rw [← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ n (λ _ _, h₁ _),
← sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 _ _ (e.trans n) (λ _ _, h₂ _)];
exact congr_arg sign_aux (equiv.ext _ _ (λ x, by simp)))
ht hs
lemma sign_symm_trans_trans [decidable_eq β] [fintype β] (f : perm α)
(e : α ≃ β) : sign ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) = sign f :=
sign_aux3_symm_trans_trans f e mem_univ mem_univ
lemma sign_prod_list_swap {l : list (perm α)}
(hl : ∀ g ∈ l, is_swap g) : sign l.prod = -1 ^ l.length :=
have h₁ : l.map sign = list.repeat (-1) l.length :=
list.eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp, λ u hu,
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := list.mem_map.1 hu in
hg.2 ▸ sign_eq_of_is_swap (hl _ hg.1)⟩,
by rw [← list.prod_repeat, ← h₁, ← is_group_hom.map_prod (@sign α _ _)]
lemma sign_surjective (hα : 1 < fintype.card α) : function.surjective (sign : perm α → units ℤ) :=
λ a, (int.units_eq_one_or a).elim
(λ h, ⟨1, by simp [h]⟩)
(λ h, let ⟨x⟩ := fintype.card_pos_iff.1 (lt_trans zero_lt_one hα) in
let ⟨y, hxy⟩ := fintype.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card hα x in
⟨swap y x, by rw [sign_swap hxy, h]⟩ )
lemma eq_sign_of_surjective_hom {s : perm α → units ℤ}
[is_group_hom s] (hs : surjective s) : s = sign :=
have ∀ {f}, is_swap f → s f = -1 :=
λ f ⟨x, y, hxy, hxy'⟩, hxy'.symm ▸ by_contradiction (λ h,
have ∀ f, is_swap f → s f = 1 := λ f ⟨a, b, hab, hab'⟩,
by rw [← is_conj_iff_eq, ← or.resolve_right (int.units_eq_one_or _) h, hab'];
exact is_group_hom.is_conj _ (is_conj_swap hab hxy),
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hs (-1) in
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := trunc.out (trunc_swap_factors g) in
have ∀ a ∈ l.map s, a = (1 : units ℤ) := λ a ha,
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := list.mem_map.1 ha in hg.2 ▸ this _ (hl.2 _ hg.1),
have s l.prod = 1,
by rw [is_group_hom.map_prod s, list.eq_repeat'.2 this, list.prod_repeat, one_pow],
by rw [hl.1, hg] at this;
exact absurd this dec_trivial),
funext $ λ f,
let ⟨l, hl₁, hl₂⟩ := trunc.out (trunc_swap_factors f) in
have hsl : ∀ a ∈ l.map s, a = (-1 : units ℤ) := λ a ha,
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := list.mem_map.1 ha in hg.2 ▸ this (hl₂ _ hg.1),
by rw [← hl₁, is_group_hom.map_prod s, list.eq_repeat'.2 hsl, list.length_map,
list.prod_repeat, sign_prod_list_swap hl₂]
lemma sign_subtype_perm (f : perm α) {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(h₁ : ∀ x, p x ↔ p (f x)) (h₂ : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → p x) : sign (subtype_perm f h₁) = sign f :=
let l := trunc.out (trunc_swap_factors (subtype_perm f h₁)) in
have hl' : ∀ g' ∈ l.1.map of_subtype, is_swap g' :=
λ g' hg',
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := list.mem_map.1 hg' in
hg.2 ▸ is_swap_of_subtype (l.2.2 _ hg.1),
have hl'₂ : (l.1.map of_subtype).prod = f,
by rw [← is_group_hom.map_prod of_subtype l.1, l.2.1, of_subtype_subtype_perm _ h₂],
by conv {congr, rw ← l.2.1, skip, rw ← hl'₂};
rw [sign_prod_list_swap l.2.2, sign_prod_list_swap hl', list.length_map]
@[simp] lemma sign_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(f : perm (subtype p)) : sign (of_subtype f) = sign f :=
have ∀ x, of_subtype f x ≠ x → p x, from λ x, not_imp_comm.1 (of_subtype_apply_of_not_mem f),
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← subtype_perm_of_subtype f, sign_subtype_perm _ _ this]}
lemma sign_eq_sign_of_equiv [decidable_eq β] [fintype β] (f : perm α) (g : perm β)
(e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ x, e (f x) = g (e x)) : sign f = sign g :=
have hg : g = (e.symm.trans f).trans e, from equiv.ext _ _ $ by simp [h],
by rw [hg, sign_symm_trans_trans]
lemma sign_bij [decidable_eq β] [fintype β]
{f : perm α} {g : perm β} (i : Π x : α, f x ≠ x → β)
(h : ∀ x hx hx', i (f x) hx' = g (i x hx))
(hi : ∀ x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂, i x₁ hx₁ = i x₂ hx₂ → x₁ = x₂)
(hg : ∀ y, g y ≠ y → ∃ x hx, i x hx = y) :
sign f = sign g :=
calc sign f = sign (@subtype_perm _ f (λ x, f x ≠ x) (by simp)) :
eq.symm (sign_subtype_perm _ _ (λ _, id))
... = sign (@subtype_perm _ g (λ x, g x ≠ x) (by simp)) :
sign_eq_sign_of_equiv _ _
(equiv.of_bijective
(show function.bijective (λ x : {x // f x ≠ x},
(⟨i x.1 x.2, have f (f x) ≠ f x, from mt (λ h, f.injective h) x.2,
by rw [← h _ x.2 this]; exact mt (hi _ _ this x.2) x.2⟩ : {y // g y ≠ y})),
from ⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h, subtype.eq (hi _ _ _ _ (subtype.mk.inj h)),
λ ⟨y, hy⟩, let ⟨x, hfx, hx⟩ := hg y hy in ⟨⟨x, hfx⟩, subtype.eq hx⟩⟩))
(λ ⟨x, _⟩, subtype.eq (h x _ _))
... = sign g : sign_subtype_perm _ _ (λ _, id)
def is_cycle (f : perm β) := ∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ ∀ y, f y ≠ y → ∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
lemma is_cycle_swap {x y : α} (hxy : x ≠ y) : is_cycle (swap x y) :=
⟨y, by rwa swap_apply_right,
λ a (ha : ite (a = x) y (ite (a = y) x a) ≠ a),
if hya : y = a then ⟨0, hya⟩
else ⟨1, by rw [gpow_one, swap_apply_def]; split_ifs at *; cc⟩⟩
lemma is_cycle_inv {f : perm β} (hf : is_cycle f) : is_cycle (f⁻¹) :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf in
⟨x, by simp [eq_inv_iff_eq, inv_eq_iff_eq, *] at *; cc,
λ y hy, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hx.2 y (by simp [eq_inv_iff_eq, inv_eq_iff_eq, *] at *; cc) in
⟨-i, by rwa [gpow_neg, inv_gpow, inv_inv]⟩⟩
lemma exists_gpow_eq_of_is_cycle {f : perm β} (hf : is_cycle f) {x y : β}
(hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) : ∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hf in
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hg.2 x hx in
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := hg.2 y hy in
⟨b - a, by rw [← ha, ← mul_apply, ← gpow_add, sub_add_cancel, hb]⟩
lemma is_cycle_swap_mul_aux₁ : ∀ (n : ℕ) {b x : α} {f : perm α}
(hb : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (h : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b
| 0 := λ b x f hb h, ⟨0, h⟩
| (n+1 : ℕ) := λ b x f hb h,
if hfbx : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx⟩
else
have f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x, from ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb,
have hb' : (swap x (f x) * f) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b,
by rw [mul_apply, apply_inv_self, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (ne.symm hfbx),
ne.def, ← injective.eq_iff f.injective, apply_inv_self];
exact this.1,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := is_cycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n hb'
(f.injective $
by rw [apply_inv_self];
rwa [pow_succ, mul_apply] at h) in
⟨i + 1, by rw [add_comm, gpow_add, mul_apply, hi, gpow_one, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb).2 (ne.symm hfbx)]⟩
lemma is_cycle_swap_mul_aux₂ : ∀ (n : ℤ) {b x : α} {f : perm α}
(hb : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (h : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b
| (n : ℕ) := λ b x f, is_cycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n
| -[1+ n] := λ b x f hb h,
if hfbx : f⁻¹ x = b then ⟨-1, by rwa [gpow_neg, gpow_one, mul_inv_rev, mul_apply, swap_inv, swap_apply_right]⟩
else if hfbx' : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx'⟩
else
have f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb,
have hb : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b,
by rw [mul_apply, swap_apply_def];
split_ifs;
simp [inv_eq_iff_eq, eq_inv_iff_eq] at *; cc,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := is_cycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n hb
(show (f⁻¹ ^ n) (f⁻¹ x) = f⁻¹ b, by
rw [← gpow_coe_nat, ← h, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, gpow_neg_succ, ← inv_pow, pow_succ', mul_assoc,
mul_assoc, inv_mul_self, mul_one, gpow_coe_nat, ← pow_succ', ← pow_succ]) in
have h : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f x) = f⁻¹ x, by rw [mul_apply, inv_apply_self, swap_apply_left],
⟨-i, by rw [← add_sub_cancel i 1, neg_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, gpow_add, gpow_one, gpow_neg, ← inv_gpow,
mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, mul_swap_eq_swap_mul, inv_apply_self, swap_comm _ x, gpow_add, gpow_one,
mul_apply, mul_apply (_ ^ i), h, hi, mul_apply, apply_inv_self, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (ne.symm hfbx')]⟩
lemma eq_swap_of_is_cycle_of_apply_apply_eq_self {f : perm α} (hf : is_cycle f) {x : α}
(hfx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) = x) : f = swap x (f x) :=
equiv.ext _ _ $ λ y,
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf in
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hz.2 x hfx in
if hyx : y = x then by simp [hyx]
else if hfyx : y = f x then by simp [hfyx, hffx]
else begin
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hyx hfyx],
refine by_contradiction (λ hy, _),
cases hz.2 y hy with j hj,
rw [← sub_add_cancel j i, gpow_add, mul_apply, hi] at hj,
cases gpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx (j - i) with hji hji,
{ rw [← hj, hji] at hyx, cc },
{ rw [← hj, hji] at hfyx, cc }
end
lemma is_cycle_swap_mul {f : perm α} (hf : is_cycle f) {x : α}
(hx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) ≠ x) : is_cycle (swap x (f x) * f) :=
⟨f x, by simp only [swap_apply_def, mul_apply];
split_ifs; simp [injective.eq_iff f.injective] at *; cc,
λ y hy,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_gpow_eq_of_is_cycle hf hx (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy).1 in
have hi : (f ^ (i - 1)) (f x) = y, from
calc (f ^ (i - 1)) (f x) = (f ^ (i - 1) * f ^ (1 : ℤ)) x : by rw [gpow_one, mul_apply]
... = y : by rwa [← gpow_add, sub_add_cancel],
is_cycle_swap_mul_aux₂ (i - 1) hy hi⟩
@[simp] lemma support_swap [fintype α] {x y : α} (hxy : x ≠ y) : (swap x y).support = {x, y} :=
finset.ext.2 $ λ a, by simp [swap_apply_def]; split_ifs; cc
lemma card_support_swap [fintype α] {x y : α} (hxy : x ≠ y) : (swap x y).support.card = 2 :=
show (swap x y).support.card = finset.card ⟨x::y::0, by simp [hxy]⟩,
from congr_arg card $ by rw [support_swap hxy]; simp [*, finset.ext]; cc
lemma sign_cycle [fintype α] : ∀ {f : perm α} (hf : is_cycle f),
sign f = -(-1 ^ f.support.card)
| f := λ hf,
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf in
calc sign f = sign (swap x (f x) * (swap x (f x) * f)) :
by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_def, mul_def, swap_swap, trans_refl]
... = -(-1 ^ f.support.card) :
if h1 : f (f x) = x
then
have h : swap x (f x) * f = 1,
by conv in (f) {rw eq_swap_of_is_cycle_of_apply_apply_eq_self hf hx.1 h1 };
simp [mul_def, one_def],
by rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, h, sign_one, eq_swap_of_is_cycle_of_apply_apply_eq_self hf hx.1 h1,
card_support_swap hx.1.symm]; refl
else
have h : card (support (swap x (f x) * f)) + 1 = card (support f),
by rw [← insert_erase (mem_support.2 hx.1), support_swap_mul_eq h1,
card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_erase _ _)],
have wf : card (support (swap x (f x) * f)) < card (support f),
from card_support_swap_mul hx.1,
by rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, sign_cycle (is_cycle_swap_mul hf hx.1 h1), ← h];
simp [pow_add]
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf (λ f, f.support.card)⟩]}
end sign
end equiv.perm
lemma finset.prod_univ_perm [fintype α] [comm_monoid β] {f : α → β} (σ : perm α) :
(univ : finset α).prod f = univ.prod (λ z, f (σ z)) :=
eq.symm $ prod_bij (λ z _, σ z) (λ _ _, mem_univ _) (λ _ _, rfl)
(λ _ _ _ _ H, σ.injective H) (λ b _, ⟨σ⁻¹ b, mem_univ _, by simp⟩)
lemma finset.sum_univ_perm [fintype α] [add_comm_monoid β] {f : α → β} (σ : perm α) :
(univ : finset α).sum f = univ.sum (λ z, f (σ z)) :=
@finset.prod_univ_perm _ (multiplicative β) _ _ f σ
attribute [to_additive] finset.prod_univ_perm
|
f0f419bf6eedd42585c64f97cd2552f9fc791d65 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/algebra/group.lean | 216472bfea4305a951ab3ed644ac945b5b7944b9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,027 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Various multiplicative and additive structures. Partially modeled on Isabelle's library.
-/
import logic.eq data.sigma data.prod
import algebra.binary algebra.priority
open binary
variable {A : Type}
/- semigroup -/
/- TODO(Leo): decide whether we keep this annotation or not -/
-- attribute inv [light 3]
-- attribute neg [light 3]
structure semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends has_mul A :=
(mul_assoc : ∀a b c : A, a * b * c = a * (b * c))
-- We add pattern hints to the following lemma because we want it to be used in both directions
-- at inst_simp strategy.
attribute [simp]
theorem mul.assoc [semigroup A] (a b c : A) : a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
semigroup.mul_assoc a b c
set_option pp.all true
structure comm_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A :=
(mul_comm : ∀a b : A, a * b = b * a)
attribute [simp]
theorem mul.comm [comm_semigroup A] (a b : A) : a * b = b * a :=
comm_semigroup.mul_comm a b
attribute [simp]
theorem mul.left_comm [comm_semigroup A] (a b c : A) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) :=
binary.left_comm (@mul.comm A _) (@mul.assoc A _) a b c
theorem mul.right_comm [comm_semigroup A] (a b c : A) : (a * b) * c = (a * c) * b :=
sorry -- by simp
structure left_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A :=
(mul_left_cancel : ∀a b c : A, a * b = a * c → b = c)
theorem mul.left_cancel [left_cancel_semigroup A] {a b c : A} : a * b = a * c → b = c :=
left_cancel_semigroup.mul_left_cancel a b c
abbreviation eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left' := @mul.left_cancel
structure right_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A :=
(mul_right_cancel : ∀a b c : A, a * b = c * b → a = c)
theorem mul.right_cancel [right_cancel_semigroup A] {a b c : A} : a * b = c * b → a = c :=
right_cancel_semigroup.mul_right_cancel a b c
abbreviation eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right' := @mul.right_cancel
/- additive semigroup -/
structure add_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends has_add A :=
(add_assoc : ∀a b c : A, a + b + c = a + (b + c))
attribute [simp]
theorem add.assoc [add_semigroup A] (a b c : A) : a + b + c = a + (b + c) :=
add_semigroup.add_assoc a b c
structure add_comm_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A :=
(add_comm : ∀a b : A, a + b = b + a)
attribute [simp]
theorem add.comm [add_comm_semigroup A] (a b : A) : a + b = b + a :=
add_comm_semigroup.add_comm a b
attribute [simp]
theorem add.left_comm [add_comm_semigroup A] (a b c : A) : a + (b + c) = b + (a + c) :=
binary.left_comm (@add.comm A _) (@add.assoc A _) a b c
theorem add.right_comm [add_comm_semigroup A] (a b c : A) : (a + b) + c = (a + c) + b :=
sorry -- by simp
structure add_left_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A :=
(add_left_cancel : ∀a b c : A, a + b = a + c → b = c)
theorem add.left_cancel [add_left_cancel_semigroup A] {a b c : A} : a + b = a + c → b = c :=
add_left_cancel_semigroup.add_left_cancel a b c
abbreviation eq_of_add_eq_add_left := @add.left_cancel
structure add_right_cancel_semigroup [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A :=
(add_right_cancel : ∀a b c : A, a + b = c + b → a = c)
theorem add.right_cancel [add_right_cancel_semigroup A] {a b c : A} : a + b = c + b → a = c :=
add_right_cancel_semigroup.add_right_cancel a b c
abbreviation eq_of_add_eq_add_right := @add.right_cancel
/- monoid -/
structure monoid [class] (A : Type) extends semigroup A, has_one A :=
(one_mul : ∀a : A, 1 * a = a) (mul_one : ∀a : A, a * 1 = a)
attribute [simp]
theorem one_mul [monoid A] (a : A) : 1 * a = a := monoid.one_mul a
attribute [simp]
theorem mul_one [monoid A] (a : A) : a * 1 = a := monoid.mul_one a
structure comm_monoid [class] (A : Type) extends monoid A, comm_semigroup A
/- additive monoid -/
structure add_monoid [class] (A : Type) extends add_semigroup A, has_zero A :=
(zero_add : ∀a : A, 0 + a = a) (add_zero : ∀a : A, a + 0 = a)
attribute [simp]
theorem zero_add [add_monoid A] (a : A) : 0 + a = a := add_monoid.zero_add a
attribute [simp]
theorem add_zero [add_monoid A] (a : A) : a + 0 = a := add_monoid.add_zero a
structure add_comm_monoid [class] (A : Type) extends add_monoid A, add_comm_semigroup A
definition add_monoid.to_monoid {A : Type} [add_monoid A] : monoid A :=
⦃ monoid,
mul := add_monoid.add,
mul_assoc := add_monoid.add_assoc,
one := add_monoid.zero A,
mul_one := add_monoid.add_zero,
one_mul := add_monoid.zero_add
⦄
definition add_comm_monoid.to_comm_monoid {A : Type} [add_comm_monoid A] : comm_monoid A :=
⦃ comm_monoid,
add_monoid.to_monoid,
mul_comm := add_comm_monoid.add_comm
⦄
section add_comm_monoid
variables [add_comm_monoid A]
theorem add_comm_three (a b c : A) : a + b + c = c + b + a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add.comm4 : ∀ (n m k l : A), n + m + (k + l) = n + k + (m + l) :=
sorry -- by simp
end add_comm_monoid
/- group -/
structure group [class] (A : Type) extends monoid A, has_inv A :=
(mul_left_inv : ∀a : A, a⁻¹ * a = 1)
-- Note: with more work, we could derive the axiom one_mul
section group
variable [group A]
attribute [simp]
theorem mul.left_inv (a : A) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := group.mul_left_inv a
attribute [simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left (a b : A) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
sorry -- by rewrite [-mul.assoc, mul.left_inv, one_mul]
attribute [simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right (a b : A) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one {a b : A} (H : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
sorry
/-
have a⁻¹ * 1 = b, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem one_inv : 1⁻¹ = (1 : A) :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (one_mul 1)
attribute [simp]
theorem inv_inv (a : A) : (a⁻¹)⁻¹ = a :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (mul.left_inv a)
variable (A)
theorem left_inverse_inv : function.left_inverse (λ a : A, a⁻¹) (λ a, a⁻¹) :=
take a, inv_inv a
variable {A}
theorem inv.inj {a b : A} (H : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹) : a = b :=
sorry
/-
have a = a⁻¹⁻¹, by simp_nohyps,
by inst_simp
-/
theorem inv_eq_inv_iff_eq (a b : A) : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
sorry -- iff.intro (assume H, inv.inj H) (by simp)
theorem inv_eq_one_iff_eq_one (a : A) : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
sorry
/-
have a⁻¹ = 1⁻¹ ↔ a = 1, from inv_eq_inv_iff_eq a 1,
by simp
-/
theorem eq_one_of_inv_eq_one (a : A) : a⁻¹ = 1 → a = 1 :=
iff.mp (inv_eq_one_iff_eq_one a)
theorem eq_inv_of_eq_inv {a b : A} (H : a = b⁻¹) : b = a⁻¹ :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_inv_iff_eq_inv (a b : A) : a = b⁻¹ ↔ b = a⁻¹ :=
iff.intro eq_inv_of_eq_inv eq_inv_of_eq_inv
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one {a b : A} (H : a * b = 1) : a = b⁻¹ :=
sorry
/-
have a⁻¹ = b, from inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one H,
by inst_simp
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem mul.right_inv (a : A) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
sorry
/-
have a = a⁻¹⁻¹, by simp,
by inst_simp
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left (a b : A) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right (a b : A) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
theorem mul_inv (a b : A) : (a * b)⁻¹ = b⁻¹ * a⁻¹ :=
sorry -- inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (by inst_simp)
theorem eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one {a b : A} (H : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b :=
sorry
/-
have a⁻¹ * 1 = a⁻¹, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
theorem eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq {a b c : A} (H : a * c = b) : a = b * c⁻¹ :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq {a b c : A} (H : b * a = c) : a = b⁻¹ * c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul {a b c : A} (H : b = a * c) : a⁻¹ * b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul {a b c : A} (H : a = c * b) : a * b⁻¹ = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq {a b c : A} (H : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq {a b c : A} (H : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul {a b c : A} (H : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv {a b c : A} (H : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem mul_eq_iff_eq_inv_mul (a b c : A) : a * b = c ↔ b = a⁻¹ * c :=
iff.intro eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul
theorem mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_inv (a b c : A) : a * b = c ↔ a = c * b⁻¹ :=
iff.intro eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv
theorem mul_left_cancel {a b c : A} (H : a * b = a * c) : b = c :=
sorry
/-
have a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
theorem mul_right_cancel {a b c : A} (H : a * b = c * b) : a = c :=
sorry
/-
have a * b * b⁻¹ = a, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
theorem mul_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : A} (H : b * a = 1) : a * b = 1 :=
sorry -- by rewrite [-inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one H, mul.left_inv]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_mul_eq_one (a b : A) : a * b = 1 ↔ b * a = 1 :=
iff.intro mul_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one mul_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one
definition conj_by (g a : A) := g * a * g⁻¹
definition is_conjugate (a b : A) := ∃ x, conj_by x b = a
local infixl ` ~ ` := is_conjugate
local infixr ` ∘c `:55 := conj_by
local attribute conj_by [reducible]
attribute [simp]
lemma conj_compose (f g a : A) : f ∘c g ∘c a = f*g ∘c a :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
lemma conj_id (a : A) : 1 ∘c a = a :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
lemma conj_one (g : A) : g ∘c 1 = 1 :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
lemma conj_inv_cancel (g : A) : ∀ a, g⁻¹ ∘c g ∘c a = a :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
lemma conj_inv (g : A) : ∀ a, (g ∘c a)⁻¹ = g ∘c a⁻¹ :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
lemma is_conj.refl (a : A) : a ~ a := exists.intro 1 (conj_id a)
lemma is_conj.symm (a b : A) : a ~ b → b ~ a :=
sorry
/-
assume Pab, obtain x (Pconj : x ∘c b = a), from Pab,
have Pxinv : x⁻¹ ∘c x ∘c b = x⁻¹ ∘c a, by simp,
exists.intro x⁻¹ (by simp)
-/
lemma is_conj.trans (a b c : A) : a ~ b → b ~ c → a ~ c :=
sorry
/-
assume Pab, assume Pbc,
obtain x (Px : x ∘c b = a), from Pab,
obtain y (Py : y ∘c c = b), from Pbc,
exists.intro (x*y) (by inst_simp)
-/
end group
attribute [instance]
definition group.to_left_cancel_semigroup [s : group A] :
left_cancel_semigroup A :=
⦃ left_cancel_semigroup, s,
mul_left_cancel := @mul_left_cancel A s ⦄
attribute [instance]
definition group.to_right_cancel_semigroup [s : group A] :
right_cancel_semigroup A :=
⦃ right_cancel_semigroup, s,
mul_right_cancel := @mul_right_cancel A s ⦄
structure comm_group [class] (A : Type) extends group A, comm_monoid A
/- additive group -/
structure add_group [class] (A : Type) extends add_monoid A, has_neg A :=
(add_left_inv : ∀a : A, -a + a = 0)
definition add_group.to_group {A : Type} [add_group A] : group A :=
⦃ group, add_monoid.to_monoid,
mul_left_inv := add_group.add_left_inv ⦄
section add_group
variables [s : add_group A]
include s
attribute [simp]
theorem add.left_inv (a : A) : -a + a = 0 := add_group.add_left_inv a
attribute [simp]
theorem neg_add_cancel_left (a b : A) : -a + (a + b) = b :=
calc -a + (a + b) = (-a + a) + b : sorry -- by rewrite add.assoc
... = b : sorry -- by simp
attribute [simp]
theorem neg_add_cancel_right (a b : A) : a + -b + b = a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero {a b : A} (H : a + b = 0) : -a = b :=
sorry
/-
have -a + 0 = b, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem neg_zero : -0 = (0 : A) := neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (zero_add 0)
attribute [simp]
theorem neg_neg (a : A) : -(-a) = a := neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (add.left_inv a)
variable (A)
theorem left_inverse_neg : function.left_inverse (λ a : A, - a) (λ a, - a) :=
take a, neg_neg a
variable {A}
theorem eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero {a b : A} (H : a + b = 0) : a = -b :=
have -a = b, from neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero H,
sorry -- by inst_simp
theorem neg.inj {a b : A} (H : -a = -b) : a = b :=
sorry
/-
have a = -(-a), by simp_nohyps,
by inst_simp
-/
theorem neg_eq_neg_iff_eq (a b : A) : -a = -b ↔ a = b :=
sorry -- iff.intro (assume H, neg.inj H) (by simp)
theorem eq_of_neg_eq_neg {a b : A} : -a = -b → a = b :=
iff.mp (neg_eq_neg_iff_eq a b)
theorem neg_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero (a : A) : -a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
have -a = -0 ↔ a = 0, from neg_eq_neg_iff_eq a 0,
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_zero_of_neg_eq_zero {a : A} : -a = 0 → a = 0 :=
iff.mp (neg_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero a)
theorem eq_neg_of_eq_neg {a b : A} (H : a = -b) : b = -a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_neg_iff_eq_neg (a b : A) : a = -b ↔ b = -a :=
iff.intro eq_neg_of_eq_neg eq_neg_of_eq_neg
attribute [simp]
theorem add.right_inv (a : A) : a + -a = 0 :=
sorry
/-
have a = -(-a), by simp,
by inst_simp
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem add_neg_cancel_left (a b : A) : a + (-a + b) = b :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
theorem add_neg_cancel_right (a b : A) : a + b + -b = a :=
sorry -- by simp
attribute [simp]
theorem neg_add_rev (a b : A) : -(a + b) = -b + -a :=
sorry -- neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (by simp)
-- TODO: delete these in favor of sub rules?
theorem eq_add_neg_of_add_eq {a b c : A} (H : a + c = b) : a = b + -c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_neg_add_of_add_eq {a b c : A} (H : b + a = c) : a = -b + c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem neg_add_eq_of_eq_add {a b c : A} (H : b = a + c) : -a + b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_neg_eq_of_eq_add {a b c : A} (H : a = c + b) : a + -b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_add_of_add_neg_eq {a b c : A} (H : a + -c = b) : a = b + c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_add_of_neg_add_eq {a b c : A} (H : -b + a = c) : a = b + c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_eq_of_eq_neg_add {a b c : A} (H : b = -a + c) : a + b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_eq_of_eq_add_neg {a b c : A} (H : a = c + -b) : a + b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_eq_iff_eq_neg_add (a b c : A) : a + b = c ↔ b = -a + c :=
iff.intro eq_neg_add_of_add_eq add_eq_of_eq_neg_add
theorem add_eq_iff_eq_add_neg (a b c : A) : a + b = c ↔ a = c + -b :=
iff.intro eq_add_neg_of_add_eq add_eq_of_eq_add_neg
theorem add_left_cancel {a b c : A} (H : a + b = a + c) : b = c :=
sorry
/-
have -a + (a + b) = b, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
theorem add_right_cancel {a b c : A} (H : a + b = c + b) : a = c :=
sorry
/-
have a + b + -b = a, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
attribute [instance]
definition add_group.to_left_cancel_semigroup : add_left_cancel_semigroup A :=
⦃ add_left_cancel_semigroup, s,
add_left_cancel := @add_left_cancel A s ⦄
attribute [instance]
definition add_group.to_add_right_cancel_semigroup :
add_right_cancel_semigroup A :=
⦃ add_right_cancel_semigroup, s,
add_right_cancel := @add_right_cancel A s ⦄
theorem add_neg_eq_neg_add_rev {a b : A} : a + -b = -(b + -a) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem ne_add_of_ne_zero_right (a : A) {b : A} (H : b ≠ 0) : a ≠ b + a :=
sorry
/-
begin
intro Heq,
apply H,
rewrite [-zero_add a at Heq{1}],
let Heq' := eq_of_add_eq_add_right Heq,
apply eq.symm Heq'
end
-/
theorem ne_add_of_ne_zero_left (a : A) {b : A} (H : b ≠ 0) : a ≠ a + b :=
sorry
/-
begin
intro Heq,
apply H,
rewrite [-add_zero a at Heq{1}],
let Heq' := eq_of_add_eq_add_left Heq,
apply eq.symm Heq'
end
-/
/- sub -/
-- TODO: derive corresponding facts for div in a field
attribute [reducible]
protected definition algebra.sub (a b : A) : A := a + -b
attribute [instance]
definition add_group_has_sub : has_sub A :=
has_sub.mk algebra.sub
attribute [simp]
theorem sub_eq_add_neg (a b : A) : a - b = a + -b := rfl
theorem sub_self (a : A) : a - a = 0 := add.right_inv a
theorem sub_add_cancel (a b : A) : a - b + b = a := neg_add_cancel_right a b
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : A) : a + b - b = a := add_neg_cancel_right a b
theorem add_sub_assoc (a b c : A) : a + b - c = a + (b - c) :=
sorry -- by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg, add.assoc, -sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem eq_of_sub_eq_zero {a b : A} (H : a - b = 0) : a = b :=
sorry
/-
have -a + 0 = -a, by inst_simp,
by inst_simp
-/
theorem eq_iff_sub_eq_zero (a b : A) : a = b ↔ a - b = 0 :=
iff.intro (assume H, eq.subst H (sub_self _)) (assume H, eq_of_sub_eq_zero H)
theorem zero_sub (a : A) : 0 - a = -a := zero_add (-a)
theorem sub_zero (a : A) : a - 0 = a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_ne_zero_of_ne {a b : A} (H : a ≠ b) : a - b ≠ 0 :=
sorry
/-
begin
intro Hab,
apply H,
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero Hab
end
-/
theorem sub_neg_eq_add (a b : A) : a - (-b) = a + b :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem neg_sub (a b : A) : -(a - b) = b - a :=
sorry -- neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (by inst_simp)
theorem add_sub (a b c : A) : a + (b - c) = a + b - c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap (a b c : A) : a - (b + c) = a - c - b :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
theorem sub_eq_iff_eq_add (a b c : A) : a - b = c ↔ a = c + b :=
iff.intro (assume H, eq_add_of_add_neg_eq H) (assume H, add_neg_eq_of_eq_add H)
theorem eq_sub_iff_add_eq (a b c : A) : a = b - c ↔ a + c = b :=
iff.intro (assume H, add_eq_of_eq_add_neg H) (assume H, eq_add_neg_of_add_eq H)
theorem eq_iff_eq_of_sub_eq_sub {a b c d : A} (H : a - b = c - d) : a = b ↔ c = d :=
calc
a = b ↔ a - b = 0 : eq_iff_sub_eq_zero a b
... = (c - d = 0) : sorry -- by rewrite H
... ↔ c = d : iff.symm (eq_iff_sub_eq_zero c d)
theorem eq_sub_of_add_eq {a b c : A} (H : a + c = b) : a = b - c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_eq_of_eq_add {a b c : A} (H : a = c + b) : a - b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_add_of_sub_eq {a b c : A} (H : a - c = b) : a = b + c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_eq_of_eq_sub {a b c : A} (H : a = c - b) : a + b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem left_inverse_sub_add_left (c : A) : function.left_inverse (λ x, x - c) (λ x, x + c) :=
take x, add_sub_cancel x c
theorem left_inverse_add_left_sub (c : A) : function.left_inverse (λ x, x + c) (λ x, x - c) :=
take x, sub_add_cancel x c
theorem left_inverse_add_right_neg_add (c : A) :
function.left_inverse (λ x, c + x) (λ x, - c + x) :=
take x, add_neg_cancel_left c x
theorem left_inverse_neg_add_add_right (c : A) :
function.left_inverse (λ x, - c + x) (λ x, c + x) :=
take x, neg_add_cancel_left c x
end add_group
structure add_comm_group [class] (A : Type) extends add_group A, add_comm_monoid A
section add_comm_group
variable [s : add_comm_group A]
include s
theorem sub_add_eq_sub_sub (a b c : A) : a - (b + c) = a - b - c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem neg_add_eq_sub (a b : A) : -a + b = b - a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem neg_add (a b : A) : -(a + b) = -a + -b :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_add_eq_add_sub (a b c : A) : a - b + c = a + c - b :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_sub (a b c : A) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_sub_add_left_eq_sub (a b c : A) : (c + a) - (c + b) = a - b :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_sub_of_add_eq' {a b c : A} (H : c + a = b) : a = b - c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_eq_of_eq_add' {a b c : A} (H : a = b + c) : a - b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem eq_add_of_sub_eq' {a b c : A} (H : a - b = c) : a = b + c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_eq_of_eq_sub' {a b c : A} (H : b = c - a) : a + b = c :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_sub_self (a b : A) : a - (a - b) = b :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_sub_comm (a b c d : A) : a + b - (c + d) = (a - c) + (b - d) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem sub_eq_sub_add_sub (a b c : A) : a - b = c - b + (a - c) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem neg_neg_sub_neg (a b : A) : - (-a - -b) = a - b :=
sorry -- by simp
end add_comm_group
definition group_of_add_group (A : Type) [G : add_group A] : group A :=
⦃group,
mul := has_add.add,
mul_assoc := add.assoc,
one := has_zero.zero A,
one_mul := zero_add,
mul_one := add_zero,
inv := has_neg.neg,
mul_left_inv := add.left_inv⦄
namespace norm_num
reveal add.assoc
definition add1 [has_add A] [has_one A] (a : A) : A := add a one
local attribute add1 bit0 bit1 [reducible]
theorem add_comm_four [add_comm_semigroup A] (a b : A) : a + a + (b + b) = (a + b) + (a + b) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add_comm_middle [add_comm_semigroup A] (a b c : A) : a + b + c = a + c + b :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem bit0_add_bit0 [add_comm_semigroup A] (a b : A) : bit0 a + bit0 b = bit0 (a + b) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem bit0_add_bit0_helper [add_comm_semigroup A] (a b t : A) (H : a + b = t) :
bit0 a + bit0 b = bit0 t :=
sorry -- by rewrite -H; simp
theorem bit1_add_bit0 [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a b : A) :
bit1 a + bit0 b = bit1 (a + b) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem bit1_add_bit0_helper [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a b t : A)
(H : a + b = t) : bit1 a + bit0 b = bit1 t :=
sorry -- by rewrite -H; simp
theorem bit0_add_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a b : A) :
bit0 a + bit1 b = bit1 (a + b) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem bit0_add_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a b t : A)
(H : a + b = t) : bit0 a + bit1 b = bit1 t :=
sorry -- by rewrite -H; simp
theorem bit1_add_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a b : A) :
bit1 a + bit1 b = bit0 (add1 (a + b)) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem bit1_add_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a b t s: A)
(H : (a + b) = t) (H2 : add1 t = s) : bit1 a + bit1 b = bit0 s :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
theorem bin_add_zero [add_monoid A] (a : A) : a + zero = a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem bin_zero_add [add_monoid A] (a : A) : zero + a = a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem one_add_bit0 [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a : A) : one + bit0 a = bit1 a :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem bit0_add_one [has_add A] [has_one A] (a : A) : bit0 a + one = bit1 a :=
rfl
theorem bit1_add_one [has_add A] [has_one A] (a : A) : bit1 a + one = add1 (bit1 a) :=
rfl
theorem bit1_add_one_helper [has_add A] [has_one A] (a t : A) (H : add1 (bit1 a) = t) :
bit1 a + one = t :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
theorem one_add_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a : A) : one + bit1 a = add1 (bit1 a) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem one_add_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a t : A)
(H : add1 (bit1 a) = t) : one + bit1 a = t :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
theorem add1_bit0 [has_add A] [has_one A] (a : A) : add1 (bit0 a) = bit1 a :=
rfl
theorem add1_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a : A) :
add1 (bit1 a) = bit0 (add1 a) :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem add1_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup A] [has_one A] (a t : A) (H : add1 a = t) :
add1 (bit1 a) = bit0 t :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
theorem add1_one [has_add A] [has_one A] : add1 (one : A) = bit0 one :=
rfl
theorem add1_zero [add_monoid A] [has_one A] : add1 (zero : A) = one :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem one_add_one [has_add A] [has_one A] : (one : A) + one = bit0 one :=
rfl
theorem subst_into_sum [has_add A] (l r tl tr t : A) (prl : l = tl) (prr : r = tr)
(prt : tl + tr = t) : l + r = t :=
sorry -- by simp
theorem neg_zero_helper [add_group A] (a : A) (H : a = 0) : - a = 0 :=
sorry -- by simp
end norm_num
attribute [simp]
zero_add add_zero one_mul mul_one
attribute [simp]
neg_neg sub_eq_add_neg
attribute [simp]
add.assoc add.comm add.left_comm
mul.left_comm mul.comm mul.assoc
|
3a4a4771fc211254800901308ae06e345cb52e22 | a047a4718edfa935d17231e9e6ecec8c7b701e05 | /src/analysis/normed_space/finite_dimension.lean | d01acb2c07f0830a5f3a047d2875710bae4e9e51 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | utensil-contrib/mathlib | bae0c9fafe5e2bdb516efc89d6f8c1502ecc9767 | b91909e77e219098a2f8cc031f89d595fe274bd2 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,048,976,965 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 273,197,855 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,592,472,812,000 | 1,592,472,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,345 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.normed_space.operator_norm
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import tactic.omega
/-!
# Finite dimensional normed spaces over complete fields
Over a complete nondiscrete field, in finite dimension, all norms are equivalent and all linear maps
are continuous. Moreover, a finite-dimensional subspace is always complete and closed.
## Main results:
* `linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional` : a linear map on a finite-dimensional space over a
complete field is continuous.
* `finite_dimensional.complete` : a finite-dimensional space over a complete field is complete. This
is not registered as an instance, as the field would be an unknown metavariable in typeclass
resolution.
* `submodule.closed_of_finite_dimensional` : a finite-dimensional subspace over a complete field is
closed
* `finite_dimensional.proper` : a finite-dimensional space over a proper field is proper. This
is not registered as an instance, as the field would be an unknown metavariable in typeclass
resolution. It is however registered as an instance for `𝕜 = ℝ` and `𝕜 = ℂ`. As properness
implies completeness, there is no need to also register `finite_dimensional.complete` on `ℝ` or
`ℂ`.
## Implementation notes
The fact that all norms are equivalent is not written explicitly, as it would mean having two norms
on a single space, which is not the way type classes work. However, if one has a
finite-dimensional vector space `E` with a norm, and a copy `E'` of this type with another norm,
then the identities from `E` to `E'` and from `E'`to `E` are continuous thanks to
`linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional`. This gives the desired norm equivalence.
-/
universes u v w x
open set finite_dimensional
open_locale classical big_operators
/-- A linear map on `ι → 𝕜` (where `ι` is a fintype) is continuous -/
lemma linear_map.continuous_on_pi {ι : Type w} [fintype ι] {𝕜 : Type u} [normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type v} [add_comm_group E] [vector_space 𝕜 E] [topological_space E]
[topological_add_group E] [topological_vector_space 𝕜 E] (f : (ι → 𝕜) →ₗ[𝕜] E) : continuous f :=
begin
-- for the proof, write `f` in the standard basis, and use that each coordinate is a continuous
-- function.
have : (f : (ι → 𝕜) → E) =
(λx, ∑ i : ι, x i • (f (λj, if i = j then 1 else 0))),
by { ext x, exact f.pi_apply_eq_sum_univ x },
rw this,
refine continuous_finset_sum _ (λi hi, _),
exact (continuous_apply i).smul continuous_const
end
section complete_field
variables {𝕜 : Type u} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type v} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type w} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{F' : Type x} [add_comm_group F'] [vector_space 𝕜 F'] [topological_space F']
[topological_add_group F'] [topological_vector_space 𝕜 F']
[complete_space 𝕜]
/-- In finite dimension over a complete field, the canonical identification (in terms of a basis)
with `𝕜^n` together with its sup norm is continuous. This is the nontrivial part in the fact that
all norms are equivalent in finite dimension.
This statement is superceded by the fact that every linear map on a finite-dimensional space is
continuous, in `linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional`. -/
lemma continuous_equiv_fun_basis {ι : Type v} [fintype ι] (ξ : ι → E) (hξ : is_basis 𝕜 ξ) :
continuous (equiv_fun_basis hξ) :=
begin
unfreezeI,
induction hn : fintype.card ι with n IH generalizing ι E,
{ apply linear_map.continuous_of_bound _ 0 (λx, _),
have : equiv_fun_basis hξ x = 0,
by { ext i, exact (fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.1 hn i).elim },
change ∥equiv_fun_basis hξ x∥ ≤ 0 * ∥x∥,
rw this,
simp [norm_nonneg] },
{ haveI : finite_dimensional 𝕜 E := of_finite_basis hξ,
-- first step: thanks to the inductive assumption, any n-dimensional subspace is equivalent
-- to a standard space of dimension n, hence it is complete and therefore closed.
have H₁ : ∀s : submodule 𝕜 E, findim 𝕜 s = n → is_closed (s : set E),
{ assume s s_dim,
rcases exists_is_basis_finite 𝕜 s with ⟨b, b_basis, b_finite⟩,
letI : fintype b := finite.fintype b_finite,
have U : uniform_embedding (equiv_fun_basis b_basis).symm.to_equiv,
{ have : fintype.card b = n,
by { rw ← s_dim, exact (findim_eq_card_basis b_basis).symm },
have : continuous (equiv_fun_basis b_basis) := IH (subtype.val : b → s) b_basis this,
exact (equiv_fun_basis b_basis).symm.uniform_embedding (linear_map.continuous_on_pi _) this },
have : is_complete (s : set E),
from complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete.1 ((complete_space_congr U).1 (by apply_instance)),
exact is_closed_of_is_complete this },
-- second step: any linear form is continuous, as its kernel is closed by the first step
have H₂ : ∀f : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜, continuous f,
{ assume f,
have : findim 𝕜 f.ker = n ∨ findim 𝕜 f.ker = n.succ,
{ have Z := f.findim_range_add_findim_ker,
rw [findim_eq_card_basis hξ, hn] at Z,
have : findim 𝕜 f.range = 0 ∨ findim 𝕜 f.range = 1,
{ have I : ∀(k : ℕ), k ≤ 1 ↔ k = 0 ∨ k = 1, by omega manual,
have : findim 𝕜 f.range ≤ findim 𝕜 𝕜 := submodule.findim_le _,
rwa [findim_of_field, I] at this },
cases this,
{ rw this at Z,
right,
simpa using Z },
{ left,
rw [this, add_comm, nat.add_one] at Z,
exact nat.succ_inj Z } },
have : is_closed (f.ker : set E),
{ cases this,
{ exact H₁ _ this },
{ have : f.ker = ⊤,
by { apply eq_top_of_findim_eq, rw [findim_eq_card_basis hξ, hn, this] },
simp [this] } },
exact linear_map.continuous_iff_is_closed_ker.2 this },
-- third step: applying the continuity to the linear form corresponding to a coefficient in the
-- basis decomposition, deduce that all such coefficients are controlled in terms of the norm
have : ∀i:ι, ∃C, 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀(x:E), ∥equiv_fun_basis hξ x i∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥,
{ assume i,
let f : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜 := (linear_map.proj i).comp (equiv_fun_basis hξ),
let f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜 := { cont := H₂ f, ..f },
exact ⟨∥f'∥, norm_nonneg _, λx, continuous_linear_map.le_op_norm f' x⟩ },
-- fourth step: combine the bound on each coefficient to get a global bound and the continuity
choose C0 hC0 using this,
let C := ∑ i, C0 i,
have C_nonneg : 0 ≤ C := finset.sum_nonneg (λi hi, (hC0 i).1),
have C0_le : ∀i, C0 i ≤ C :=
λi, finset.single_le_sum (λj hj, (hC0 j).1) (finset.mem_univ _),
apply linear_map.continuous_of_bound _ C (λx, _),
rw pi_norm_le_iff,
{ exact λi, le_trans ((hC0 i).2 x) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (C0_le i) (norm_nonneg _)) },
{ exact mul_nonneg C_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) } }
end
/-- Any linear map on a finite dimensional space over a complete field is continuous. -/
theorem linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F') :
continuous f :=
begin
-- for the proof, go to a model vector space `b → 𝕜` thanks to `continuous_equiv_fun_basis`, and
-- argue that all linear maps there are continuous.
rcases exists_is_basis_finite 𝕜 E with ⟨b, b_basis, b_finite⟩,
letI : fintype b := finite.fintype b_finite,
have A : continuous (equiv_fun_basis b_basis) :=
continuous_equiv_fun_basis _ b_basis,
have B : continuous (f.comp ((equiv_fun_basis b_basis).symm : (b → 𝕜) →ₗ[𝕜] E)) :=
linear_map.continuous_on_pi _,
have : continuous ((f.comp ((equiv_fun_basis b_basis).symm : (b → 𝕜) →ₗ[𝕜] E))
∘ (equiv_fun_basis b_basis)) := B.comp A,
convert this,
ext x,
dsimp,
rw linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply
end
/-- The continuous linear map induced by a linear map on a finite dimensional space -/
def linear_map.to_continuous_linear_map [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F') : E →L[𝕜] F' :=
{ cont := f.continuous_of_finite_dimensional, ..f }
/-- The continuous linear equivalence induced by a linear equivalence on a finite dimensional space. -/
def linear_equiv.to_continuous_linear_equiv [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] (e : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] F) : E ≃L[𝕜] F :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.to_linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
haveI : finite_dimensional 𝕜 F := e.finite_dimensional,
exact e.symm.to_linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional
end,
..e }
/-- Any finite-dimensional vector space over a complete field is complete.
We do not register this as an instance to avoid an instance loop when trying to prove the
completeness of `𝕜`, and the search for `𝕜` as an unknown metavariable. Declare the instance
explicitly when needed. -/
variables (𝕜 E)
lemma finite_dimensional.complete [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] : complete_space E :=
begin
rcases exists_is_basis_finite 𝕜 E with ⟨b, b_basis, b_finite⟩,
letI : fintype b := finite.fintype b_finite,
have : uniform_embedding (equiv_fun_basis b_basis).symm :=
linear_equiv.uniform_embedding _ (linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional _)
(linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional _),
change uniform_embedding (equiv_fun_basis b_basis).symm.to_equiv at this,
exact (complete_space_congr this).1 (by apply_instance)
end
variables {𝕜 E}
/-- A finite-dimensional subspace is complete. -/
lemma submodule.complete_of_finite_dimensional (s : submodule 𝕜 E) [finite_dimensional 𝕜 s] :
is_complete (s : set E) :=
complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete.1 (finite_dimensional.complete 𝕜 s)
/-- A finite-dimensional subspace is closed. -/
lemma submodule.closed_of_finite_dimensional (s : submodule 𝕜 E) [finite_dimensional 𝕜 s] :
is_closed (s : set E) :=
is_closed_of_is_complete s.complete_of_finite_dimensional
lemma continuous_linear_map.exists_right_inverse_of_surjective [finite_dimensional 𝕜 F]
(f : E →L[𝕜] F) (hf : f.range = ⊤) :
∃ g : F →L[𝕜] E, f.comp g = continuous_linear_map.id 𝕜 F :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).exists_right_inverse_of_surjective hf in
⟨g.to_continuous_linear_map, continuous_linear_map.ext $ linear_map.ext_iff.1 hg⟩
end complete_field
section proper_field
variables (𝕜 : Type u) [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
(E : Type v) [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [proper_space 𝕜]
/-- Any finite-dimensional vector space over a proper field is proper.
We do not register this as an instance to avoid an instance loop when trying to prove the
properness of `𝕜`, and the search for `𝕜` as an unknown metavariable. Declare the instance
explicitly when needed. -/
lemma finite_dimensional.proper [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] : proper_space E :=
begin
rcases exists_is_basis_finite 𝕜 E with ⟨b, b_basis, b_finite⟩,
letI : fintype b := finite.fintype b_finite,
let e := equiv_fun_basis b_basis,
let f : E →L[𝕜] (b → 𝕜) :=
{ cont := linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional _, ..e.to_linear_map },
refine metric.proper_image_of_proper e.symm
(linear_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional _) _ (∥f∥) (λx y, _),
{ exact equiv.range_eq_univ e.symm.to_equiv },
{ have A : e (e.symm x) = x := linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _,
have B : e (e.symm y) = y := linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _,
conv_lhs { rw [← A, ← B] },
change dist (f (e.symm x)) (f (e.symm y)) ≤ ∥f∥ * dist (e.symm x) (e.symm y),
exact f.lipschitz.dist_le_mul _ _ }
end
end proper_field
/- Over the real numbers, we can register the previous statement as an instance as it will not
cause problems in instance resolution since the properness of `ℝ` is already known. -/
instance finite_dimensional.proper_real
(E : Type u) [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [finite_dimensional ℝ E] : proper_space E :=
finite_dimensional.proper ℝ E
attribute [instance, priority 900] finite_dimensional.proper_real
|
e145e8301d1bf5678ef6a8093d1c4b8556d3f986 | a3d3bdc686e1395146a6eecc22431ac7fafb6bc7 | /examples/ping_pong_server.lean | 33cc85b2b3912b3aaa9ce5f7731781f5b68e11f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/net | c66581150cad7fc8f10fe1b5fecdae2912211f75 | 218eac82ea4a4956f63a01e88dc3d2fbbad406c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,606,948,723,891 | 1,499,287,492,000 | 1,499,287,492,000 | 96,160,509 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 431 | lean | import system.io
import ..src.net
variable [io.interface]
def main : io unit := do
io.print_ln "starting ping-pong server ...",
listener ← tcp_listener.bind "localhost" 3000,
io.print_ln "listening on localhost:3000",
io.forever $ do
stream ← tcp_listener.accept listener,
io.print_ln "received ping",
tcp_stream.write stream "pong",
io.print_ln "sent pong",
return ()
|
c982c80fa09f12996b7962e07d1a645b33fe820c | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/list/basic.lean | 34396e367320d1faa226494e8a07182262340b0c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 187,697 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import control.monad.basic
import data.nat.basic
import order.rel_classes
import algebra.group_power.basic
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
attribute [inline] list.head
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem cons_ne_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ l :=
mt (congr_arg length) (nat.succ_ne_self _)
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
theorem cons_inj (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
cons_injective.eq_iff
theorem exists_cons_of_ne_nil {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) : ∃ b L, l = b :: L :=
by { induction l with c l', contradiction, use [c,l'], }
/-! ### mem -/
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem _root_.decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [decidable_eq α]
{a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
decidable.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b :: l → a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
by classical; exact decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) :
∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
lemma forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ l.map f, P i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ l, P (f j) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H j hj,
exact H (f j) (mem_map_of_mem f hj) },
{ assume H i hi,
rcases mem_map.1 hi with ⟨j, hj, ji⟩,
rw ← ji,
exact H j hj }
end
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} : list.map f l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨by cases l; simp only [forall_prop_of_true, map, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff],
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} :
b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/-! ### length -/
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_singleton (a : α) : length [a] = 1 := rfl
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_length_pos {l : list α} : 0 < length l → l ≠ [] :=
λ h1 h2, lt_irrefl 0 ((length_eq_zero.2 h2).subst h1)
theorem length_pos_of_ne_nil {l : list α} : l ≠ [] → 0 < length l :=
λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ λ h0, h $ length_eq_zero.1 h0
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
lemma exists_mem_of_ne_nil (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []) : ∃ x, x ∈ l :=
exists_mem_of_length_pos (length_pos_of_ne_nil h)
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma exists_of_length_succ {n} :
∀ l : list α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [] H := absurd H.symm $ succ_ne_zero n
| (h :: t) H := ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : injective (list.length : list α → ℕ) ↔ subsingleton α :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ x y, _⟩, suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, refl },
{ intros hα l1 l2 hl, induction l1 generalizing l2; cases l2,
{ refl }, { cases hl }, { cases hl },
congr, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _, apply l1_ih, simpa using hl }
end
@[simp] lemma length_injective [subsingleton α] : injective (length : list α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr $ by apply_instance
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
lemma empty_eq : (∅ : list α) = [] := by refl
lemma singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : list α) = [x] := rfl
lemma insert_neg [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∉ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
if_neg h
lemma insert_pos [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∈ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = l :=
if_pos h
lemma doubleton_eq [decidable_eq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : list α) = [x, y] :=
by { rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq], rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton] }
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem forall_mem_cons : ∀ {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α},
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
ball_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
@[simp] theorem append_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, simp only [subset_def] at *, split; intros; simp* },
{ rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩, apply append_subset_of_subset_of_subset h1 h2 }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (h : injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_subset f⟩, intros h2 x hx,
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩,
cases h hxx', exact hx'
end
/-! ### append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma singleton_append {x : α} {l : list α} : [x] ++ l = x :: l := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'],
exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left,
exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj :
∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) :
s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : list α) : function.injective (λ t, s ++ t) :=
λ t₁ t₂, append_left_cancel
theorem append_right_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_right_injective s).eq_iff
theorem append_left_injective (t : list α) : function.injective (λ s, s ++ t) :=
λ s₁ s₂, append_right_cancel
theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_left_injective t).eq_iff
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/-! ### repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ b = a
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := by simp [mem_repeat]
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} {n} (h : b ∈ repeat a n) : b = a :=
(mem_repeat.1 h).2
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
lemma repeat_left_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
function.injective (λ a : α, repeat a n) :=
λ a b h, (eq_repeat.1 h).2 _ $ mem_repeat.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
lemma repeat_left_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
repeat a n = repeat b n ↔ a = b :=
(repeat_left_injective hn).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma repeat_left_inj' {a b : α} :
∀ {n}, repeat a n = repeat b n ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := (repeat_left_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans $ by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
lemma repeat_right_injective (a : α) : function.injective (repeat a) :=
function.left_inverse.injective (length_repeat a)
@[simp] lemma repeat_right_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} :
repeat a n = repeat a m ↔ n = m :=
(repeat_right_injective a).eq_iff
/-! ### pure -/
@[simp] theorem mem_pure {α} (x y : α) :
x ∈ (pure y : list α) ↔ x = y := by simp! [pure,list.ret]
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
-- TODO: duplicate of a lemma in core
theorem bind_append (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
@[simp] theorem bind_singleton (f : α → list β) (x : α) : [x].bind f = f x :=
append_nil (f x)
/-! ### concat -/
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
theorem init_eq_of_concat_eq {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : concat l₁ a = concat l₂ a → l₁ = l₂ :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact append_right_cancel h
end
theorem last_eq_of_concat_eq {a b : α} {l : list α} : concat l a = concat l b → a = b :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact head_eq_of_cons_eq (append_left_cancel h)
end
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by simp
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by simp
theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by simp
/-! ### reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]];
refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
theorem reverse_concat (l : list α) (a : α) : reverse (concat l a) = a :: reverse l :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, reverse_append, reverse_singleton, singleton_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_involutive : involutive (@reverse α) :=
λ l, reverse_reverse l
@[simp] theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
lemma reverse_eq_iff {l l' : list α} :
l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff,
not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat],
λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
/-! ### empty -/
attribute [simp] list.empty
lemma empty_iff_eq_nil {l : list α} : l.empty ↔ l = [] :=
list.cases_on l (by simp) (by simp)
/-! ### init -/
@[simp] theorem length_init : ∀ (l : list α), length (init l) = length l - 1
| [] := rfl
| [a] := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) :=
begin
rw init,
simp only [add_left_inj, length, succ_add_sub_one],
exact length_init (b :: l)
end
/-! ### last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l;
[refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem init_append_last : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), init l ++ [last l h] = l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := rfl
| (a::b::l) h :=
begin
rw [init, cons_append, last_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _) (cons_ne_nil _ _)],
congr,
exact init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l)
end
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
theorem last_mem : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), last l h ∈ l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := or.inl rfl
| (a::b::l) h := or.inr $ by { rw [last_cons_cons], exact last_mem (cons_ne_nil b l) }
lemma last_repeat_succ (a m : ℕ) :
(repeat a m.succ).last (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ
(show (repeat a m.succ).length = m.succ, by rw length_repeat)) = a :=
begin
induction m with k IH,
{ simp },
{ simpa only [repeat_succ, last] }
end
/-! ### last' -/
@[simp] theorem last'_is_none :
∀ {l : list α}, (last' l).is_none ↔ l = []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_none (b::l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_is_some : ∀ {l : list α}, l.last'.is_some ↔ l ≠ []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_some (b::l)]
theorem mem_last'_eq_last : ∀ {l : list α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.last' → ∃ h, x = last l h
| [] x hx := false.elim $ by simpa using hx
| [a] x hx := have a = x, by simpa using hx, this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| (a::b::l) x hx :=
begin
rw last' at hx,
rcases mem_last'_eq_last hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use cons_ne_nil _ _,
rwa [last_cons]
end
theorem mem_of_mem_last' {l : list α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.last') : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_last'_eq_last ha in h₂.symm ▸ last_mem _
theorem init_append_last' : ∀ {l : list α} (a ∈ l.last'), init l ++ [a] = l
| [] a ha := (option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a] _ rfl := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) c hc := by { rw [last'] at hc, rw [init, cons_append, init_append_last' _ hc] }
theorem ilast_eq_last' [inhabited α] : ∀ l : list α, l.ilast = l.last'.iget
| [] := by simp [ilast, arbitrary]
| [a] := rfl
| [a, b] := rfl
| [a, b, c] := rfl
| (a :: b :: c :: l) := by simp [ilast, ilast_eq_last' (c :: l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_append_cons : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (a : α) (l₂ : list α),
last' (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = last' (a :: l₂)
| [] a l₂ := rfl
| [b] a l₂ := rfl
| (b::c::l₁) a l₂ := by rw [cons_append, cons_append, last', ← cons_append, last'_append_cons]
theorem last'_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : list α) : ∀ {l₂ : list α} (hl₂ : l₂ ≠ []),
last' (l₁ ++ l₂) = last' l₂
| [] hl₂ := by contradiction
| (b::l₂) _ := last'_append_cons l₁ b l₂
/-! ### head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
theorem mem_of_mem_head' {x : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, x ∈ l.head' → x ∈ l
| [] h := (option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| (a::l) h := by { simp only [head', option.mem_def] at h, exact h ▸ or.inl rfl }
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] :=
by { induction l, contradiction, rw [tail,cons_append,tail], }
theorem cons_head'_tail : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ head' l), a :: tail l = l
| [] a h := by contradiction
| (b::l) a h := by { simp at h, simp [h] }
theorem head_mem_head' [inhabited α] : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), head l ∈ head' l
| [] h := by contradiction
| (a::l) h := rfl
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
cons_head'_tail (head_mem_head' h)
lemma head_mem_self [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head ∈ l :=
begin
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head l.tail,
rwa cons_head_tail h at h',
end
@[simp] theorem head'_map (f : α → β) (l) : head' (map f l) = (head' l).map f := by cases l; refl
lemma tail_append_of_ne_nil (l l' : list α) (h : l ≠ []) :
(l ++ l').tail = l.tail ++ l' :=
begin
cases l,
{ contradiction },
{ simp }
end
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
def bidirectional_rec {C : list α → Sort*}
(H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : ∀ l, C l
| [] := H0
| [a] := H1 a
| (a :: b :: l) :=
let l' := init (b :: l), b' := last (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) in
have length l' < length (a :: b :: l), by { change _ < length l + 2, simp },
begin
rw ←init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l),
have : C l', from bidirectional_rec l',
exact Hn a l' b' ‹C l'›
end
using_well_founded { rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf list.length⟩] }
/-- Like `bidirectional_rec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def bidirectional_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectional_rec H0 H1 Hn l
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem sublist.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) :
l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem sublist.reverse {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact ih.append_right [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff]
using h.reverse,
λ h, h.append_right l⟩
theorem sublist.append {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α}
(hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem sublist.subset : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ s.subset
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/-! ### index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, decidable.by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/-! ### nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_len_le : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, length l ≤ n → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_len_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_len_le hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
@[simp]
theorem nth_eq_none_iff : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, nth l n = none ↔ length l ≤ n :=
begin
intros, split,
{ intro h, by_contradiction h',
have h₂ : ∃ h, l.nth_le n h = l.nth_le n (lt_of_not_ge h') := ⟨lt_of_not_ge h', rfl⟩,
rw [← nth_eq_some, h] at h₂, cases h₂ },
{ solve_by_elim [nth_len_le] },
end
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
lemma nth_zero (l : list α) : l.nth 0 = l.head' := by cases l; refl
lemma nth_injective {α : Type u} {xs : list α} {i j : ℕ}
(h₀ : i < xs.length)
(h₁ : nodup xs)
(h₂ : xs.nth i = xs.nth j) : i = j :=
begin
induction xs with x xs generalizing i j,
{ cases h₀ },
{ cases i; cases j,
case nat.zero nat.zero
{ refl },
case nat.succ nat.succ
{ congr, cases h₁,
apply xs_ih;
solve_by_elim [lt_of_succ_lt_succ] },
iterate 2
{ dsimp at h₂,
cases h₁ with _ _ h h',
cases h x _ rfl,
rw mem_iff_nth,
exact ⟨_, h₂.symm⟩ <|>
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩ } },
end
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
/-- A version of `nth_le_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem nth_le_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nth_le l n H) = nth_le (map f l) n ((length_map f l).symm ▸ H) :=
(nth_le_map f _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
/-- If one has `nth_le L i hi` in a formula and `h : L = L'`, one can not `rw h` in the formula as
`hi` gives `i < L.length` and not `i < L'.length`. The lemma `nth_le_of_eq` can be used to make
such a rewrite, with `rw (nth_le_of_eq h)`. -/
lemma nth_le_of_eq {L L' : list α} (h : L = L') {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le L' i (h ▸ hi) :=
by { congr, exact h}
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_zero [inhabited α] {L : list α} (h : 0 < L.length) :
L.nth_le 0 h = L.head :=
by { cases L, cases h, simp, }
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
lemma nth_le_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}
(h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂ : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length) : n - l₁.length < l₂.length :=
begin
rw list.length_append at h₂,
convert (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff h₁).mpr h₂,
simp,
end
lemma nth_le_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n h₂ = l₂.nth_le (n - l₁.length) (nth_le_append_right_aux h₁ h₂)
| [] _ n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) _ (n+1) h₁ h₂ :=
begin
dsimp,
conv { to_rhs, congr, skip, rw [←nat.sub_sub, nat.sub.right_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel], },
rw nth_le_append_right (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₁),
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < (list.repeat a n).length) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m h = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
lemma nth_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : l₁.length ≤ n) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₂.nth (n - l₁.length) :=
begin
by_cases hl : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length,
{ rw [nth_le_nth hl, nth_le_nth, nth_le_append_right hn] },
{ rw [nth_len_le (le_of_not_lt hl), nth_len_le],
rw [not_lt, length_append] at hl,
exact nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le hl }
end
lemma last_eq_nth_le : ∀ (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []),
last l h = l.nth_le (l.length - 1) (sub_lt (length_pos_of_ne_nil h) one_pos)
| [] h := rfl
| [a] h := by rw [last_singleton, nth_le_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) h := by { rw [last_cons, last_eq_nth_le (b :: l)],
refl, exact cons_ne_nil b l }
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = some a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
lemma nth_le_cons_length (x : α) (xs : list α) (n : ℕ) (h : n = xs.length) :
(x :: xs).nth_le n (by simp [h]) = (x :: xs).last (cons_ne_nil x xs) :=
begin
rw last_eq_nth_le,
congr,
simp [h]
end
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by { rw [nth_len_le h₁, nth_len_le], rwa [←hl], }
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} :
∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b;
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 :
∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i :=
by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1);
exact λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
lemma index_of_inj [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : index_of x l = index_of y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, have nth_le l (index_of x l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hx) =
nth_le l (index_of y l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hy),
by simp only [h],
by simpa only [index_of_nth_le],
λ h, by subst h⟩
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma nth_le_reverse' (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.reverse.length) (hn') :
l.reverse.nth_le n hn = l.nth_le (l.length - 1 - n) hn' :=
begin
rw eq_comm,
convert nth_le_reverse l.reverse _ _ _ using 1,
{ simp },
{ simpa }
end
lemma eq_cons_of_length_one {l : list α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nth_le 0 (h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)] :=
begin
refine ext_le (by convert h) (λ n h₁ h₂, _),
simp only [nth_le_singleton],
congr,
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₂)
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ.inj,
not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_nil (n : ℕ) (a : α) : [].update_nth n a = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma update_nth_succ (x : α) (xs : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(x :: xs).update_nth n.succ a = x :: xs.update_nth n a := rfl
lemma update_nth_comm (a b : α) : Π {n m : ℕ} (l : list α) (h : n ≠ m),
(l.update_nth n a).update_nth m b = (l.update_nth m b).update_nth n a
| _ _ [] _ := by simp
| 0 0 (x :: t) h := absurd rfl h
| (n + 1) 0 (x :: t) h := by simp [list.update_nth]
| 0 (m + 1) (x :: t) h := by simp [list.update_nth]
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (x :: t) h := by { simp only [update_nth, true_and, eq_self_iff_true],
exact update_nth_comm t (λ h', h $ nat.succ_inj'.mpr h'), }
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_eq (l : list α) (i : ℕ) (a : α)
(h : i < (l.update_nth i a).length) : (l.update_nth i a).nth_le i h = a :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← nth_le_nth, nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth]; simp * at *
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_of_ne {l : list α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.update_nth i a).length) :
(l.update_nth i a).nth_le j hj = l.nth_le j (by simpa using hj) :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_update_nth_ne _ _ h, list.nth_le_nth]
lemma mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ l.update_nth n b), a ∈ l ∨ a = b
| [] n a b h := false.elim h
| (c::l) 0 a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
or.inr (or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _)
| (c::l) (n+1) a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
(λ h, h ▸ or.inl (mem_cons_self _ _))
(λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _) or.inr)
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_succ_nil (n : ℕ) (a : α) : insert_nth (n + 1) a [] = [] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → n ≤ m →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth];
exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
lemma mem_insert_nth {a b : α} : ∀ {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (hi : n ≤ l.length),
a ∈ l.insert_nth n b ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l
| 0 as h := iff.rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := begin
dsimp [list.insert_nth],
erw [list.mem_cons_iff, mem_insert_nth (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h), list.mem_cons_iff,
← or.assoc, or_comm (a = a'), or.assoc]
end
end insert_nth
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] lemma map_nil (f : α → β) : map f [] = [] := rfl
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
map f l = foldr (λ a bs, f a :: bs) [] l :=
by induction l; simp *
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
lemma map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : list α} : map f l = map g l ↔ (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_congr⟩, intros h x hx,
rw [mem_iff_nth_le] at hx, rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩,
rw [nth_le_map_rev f, nth_le_map_rev g], congr, exact h
end
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : injective (map f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
split; intros h x y hxy,
{ suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, simp [hxy] },
{ induction y generalizing x, simpa using hxy,
cases x, simpa using hxy, simp at hxy, simp [y_ih hxy.2, h hxy.1] }
end
/--
A single `list.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `list.map` with another `list.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `list.map_map`.
-/
lemma comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : list α) :
map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) := (map_map _ _ _).symm
/--
Composing a `list.map` with another `list.map` is equal to
a single `list.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp] lemma map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) :
map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) :=
by { ext l, rw comp_map }
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (as : list α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (λ a bs, if p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as :=
by { induction as, { refl }, { simp! [*, apply_ite (map f)] } }
lemma last_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).last (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.last hl) :=
begin
induction l with l_ih l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ simpa using l_ih } }
end
/-! ### map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_flip (f : α → β → γ) :
∀ as bs, map₂ (flip f) bs as = map₂ f as bs
| [] [] := rfl
| [] (b :: bs) := rfl
| (a :: as) [] := rfl
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by { simp! [map₂_flip], refl }
/-! ### take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_length : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_length end
theorem take_all_of_le : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, length l ≤ n → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
theorem take_repeat (a : α) : ∀ (n m : ℕ), take n (repeat a m) = repeat a (min n m)
| n 0 := by simp
| 0 m := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_repeat]
lemma map_take {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_take], }
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
lemma take_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ (take i l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, take_cons, l₁_ih, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_take (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le (L.take j) i (by { rw length_take, exact lt_min hj hi }) :=
by { rw nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm hi, exact nth_le_append _ _ }
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_take' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < (L.take j).length) :
nth_le (L.take j) i hi = nth_le L i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi (by simp [le_refl])) :=
by { simp at hi, rw nth_le_take L _ hi.1 }
lemma nth_take {l : list α} {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(l.take n).nth m = l.nth m :=
begin
induction n with n hn generalizing l m,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_le m.zero_le) },
{ cases l with hd tl,
{ simp only [take_nil] },
{ cases m,
{ simp only [nth, take] },
{ simpa only using hn (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) } } },
end
@[simp] lemma nth_take_of_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
(l.take (n + 1)).nth n = l.nth n :=
nth_take (nat.lt_succ_self n)
lemma take_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
l.take (n + 1) = l.take n ++ (l.nth n).to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, take_nil, append_nil]},
{ cases n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take, nil_append] },
{ simp only [hl, cons_append, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take] } }
end
@[simp] lemma take_eq_nil_iff {l : list α} {k : ℕ} :
l.take k = [] ↔ l = [] ∨ k = 0 :=
by { cases l; cases k; simp [nat.succ_ne_zero] }
lemma init_eq_take (l : list α) : l.init = l.take l.length.pred :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ simp [init] },
{ induction l with hd tl hl generalizing x,
{ simp [init], },
{ simp [init, hl] } }
end
lemma init_take {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.take n).init = l.take n.pred :=
by simp [init_eq_take, min_eq_left_of_lt h, take_take, pred_le]
@[simp] lemma drop_eq_nil_of_le {l : list α} {k : ℕ} (h : l.length ≤ k) :
l.drop k = [] :=
by simpa [←length_eq_zero] using nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h
lemma drop_eq_nil_iff_le {l : list α} {k : ℕ} :
l.drop k = [] ↔ l.length ≤ k :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, drop_eq_nil_of_le⟩,
induction k with k hk generalizing l,
{ simp only [drop] at h,
simp [h] },
{ cases l,
{ simp },
{ simp only [drop] at h,
simpa [nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using hk h } }
end
lemma tail_drop (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp [hl] } }
end
lemma cons_nth_le_drop_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l.length) :
l.nth_le n hn :: l.drop (n + 1) = l.drop n :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ exact absurd n.zero_le (not_le_of_lt (by simpa using hn)) },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp only [nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, list.length] at hn,
simpa [list.nth_le, list.drop] using hl hn } }
end
theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α) :=
λ _, drop_eq_nil_of_le (nat.zero_le _)
lemma mem_of_mem_drop {α} {n : ℕ} {l : list α} {x : α}
(h : x ∈ l.drop n) :
x ∈ l :=
begin
induction l generalizing n,
case list.nil : n h
{ simpa using h },
case list.cons : l_hd l_tl l_ih n h
{ cases n; simp only [mem_cons_iff, drop] at h ⊢,
{ exact h },
right, apply l_ih h },
end
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_length (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
lemma drop_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, drop, l₁_ih]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : i + j < L.length) :
nth_le L (i + j) h = nth_le (L.drop i) j
begin
have A : i < L.length := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h,
rw (take_append_drop i L).symm at h,
simpa only [le_of_lt A, min_eq_left, add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take, length_append] using h
end :=
begin
have A : length (take i L) = i, by simp [le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h)],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, nth_le_append_right];
simp [A]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : j < (L.drop i).length) :
nth_le (L.drop i) j h = nth_le L (i + j) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left ((length_drop i L) ▸ h)) :=
by rw nth_le_drop
lemma nth_drop (L : list α) (i j : ℕ) :
nth (L.drop i) j = nth L (i + j) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [nth_eq_some, nth_le_drop', option.mem_def],
split;
exact λ ⟨h, ha⟩, ⟨by simpa [nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt] using h, ha⟩
end
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by ac_refl,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
lemma map_drop {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_drop], }
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
lemma reverse_take {α} {xs : list α} (n : ℕ)
(h : n ≤ xs.length) :
xs.reverse.take n = (xs.drop (xs.length - n)).reverse :=
begin
induction xs generalizing n;
simp only [reverse_cons, drop, reverse_nil, nat.zero_sub, length, take_nil],
cases h.lt_or_eq_dec with h' h',
{ replace h' := le_of_succ_le_succ h',
rwa [take_append_of_le_length, xs_ih _ h'],
rw [show xs_tl.length + 1 - n = succ (xs_tl.length - n), from _, drop],
{ rwa [succ_eq_add_one, nat.sub_add_comm] },
{ rwa length_reverse } },
{ subst h', rw [length, nat.sub_self, drop],
suffices : xs_tl.length + 1 = (xs_tl.reverse ++ [xs_hd]).length,
by rw [this, take_length, reverse_cons],
rw [length_append, length_reverse], refl }
end
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldl f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldl f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldr_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldr f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldr f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldl_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : α → γ → α) (op' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (op a x) = op' (f a) x) : foldl op' (f a) l = f (foldl op a l) :=
eq.symm $ by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]] }
theorem foldr_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : γ → α → α) (op' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (op x a) = op' x (f a)) : foldr op' (f a) l = f (foldr op a l) :=
by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]] }
lemma injective_foldl_comp {α : Type*} {l : list (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, function.injective f) (hf : function.injective f):
function.injective (@list.foldl (α → α) (α → α) function.comp f l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing f,
{ exact hf },
{ apply l_ih (λ _ h, hl _ (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)),
apply function.injective.comp hf,
apply hl _ (list.mem_cons_self _ _) }
end
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldr`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : α → β → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldr_rec_on {C : β → Sort*} (l : list α) (op : α → β → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ (b : β) (hb : C b) (a : α) (ha : a ∈ l), C (op a b)) :
C (foldr op b l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl IH,
{ exact hb },
{ refine hl _ _ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl),
refine IH _,
intros y hy x hx,
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx) }
end
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldl`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : β → α → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldl_rec_on {C : β → Sort*} (l : list α) (op : β → α → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ (b : β) (hb : C b) (a : α) (ha : a ∈ l), C (op b a)) :
C (foldl op b l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl IH generalizing b,
{ exact hb },
{ refine IH _ _ _,
{ intros y hy x hx,
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx) },
{ exact hl b hb hd (mem_cons_self hd tl) } }
end
@[simp] lemma foldr_rec_on_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldr_rec_on [] op b hb hl = hb := rfl
@[simp] lemma foldr_rec_on_cons {C : β → Sort*} (x : α) (l : list α)
(op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ (b : β) (hb : C b) (a : α) (ha : a ∈ (x :: l)), C (op a b)) :
foldr_rec_on (x :: l) op b hb hl = hl _ (foldr_rec_on l op b hb
(λ b hb a ha, hl b hb a (mem_cons_of_mem _ ha))) x (mem_cons_self _ _) := rfl
@[simp] lemma foldl_rec_on_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : β → α → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldl_rec_on [] op b hb hl = hb := rfl
/- scanl -/
section scanl
variables {f : β → α → β} {b : β} {a : α} {l : list α}
lemma length_scanl :
∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a [] := rfl
| a (x :: l) := by erw [length_cons, length_cons, length_scanl]
@[simp] lemma scanl_nil (b : β) : scanl f b nil = [b] := rfl
@[simp] lemma scanl_cons :
scanl f b (a :: l) = [b] ++ scanl f (f b a) l :=
by simp only [scanl, eq_self_iff_true, singleton_append, and_self]
@[simp] lemma nth_zero_scanl : (scanl f b l).nth 0 = some b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le 0 h = b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
lemma nth_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} :
(scanl f b l).nth (i + 1) = ((scanl f b l).nth i).bind (λ x, (l.nth i).map (λ y, f x y)) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing b i,
{ symmetry,
simp only [option.bind_eq_none', nth, forall_2_true_iff, not_false_iff, option.map_none',
scanl_nil, option.not_mem_none, forall_true_iff] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append],
cases i,
{ simp only [option.map_some', nth_zero_scanl, nth, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [hl, nth] } }
end
lemma nth_le_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le (i + 1) h =
f ((scanl f b l).nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt h))
(l.nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l))))) :=
begin
induction i with i hi generalizing b l,
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, zero_add, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (lt_irrefl 1) },
{ simp only [scanl_cons, singleton_append, nth_le_zero_scanl, nth_le] } },
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, add_lt_iff_neg_right, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_lt nat.succ_pos') },
{ simp_rw scanl_cons,
rw nth_le_append_right _,
{ simpa only [hi, length, succ_add_sub_one] },
{ simp only [length, nat.zero_le, le_add_iff_nonneg_left] } } }
end
end scanl
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) :=
by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → α}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldl,foldl,foldl,← foldl_eq_of_comm',foldl,hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a [] := rfl
| a (b :: l) := by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf,foldr,foldl_eq_foldr']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → β}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)
include hf
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b::l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldr,foldr,foldr,hf,← foldr_eq_of_comm']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc];
rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### mfoldl, mfoldr, mmap -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
theorem mfoldr_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
mfoldr f b l = foldr (λ a mb, mb >>= f a) (pure b) l :=
by induction l; simp *
attribute [simp] mmap mmap'
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
theorem mfoldl_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
mfoldl f b l = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) (pure b) l :=
begin
suffices h : ∀ (mb : m β),
(mb >>= λ b, mfoldl f b l) = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) mb l,
by simp [←h (pure b)],
induction l; intro,
{ simp },
{ simp only [mfoldl, foldl, ←l_ih] with monad_norm }
end
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/-! ### prod and sum -/
-- list.sum was already defined in defs.lean, but we couldn't tag it with `to_additive` yet.
attribute [to_additive] list.prod
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, priority 500]
theorem prod_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (list.repeat a n).prod = a ^ n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ rw pow_zero, refl },
{ rw [list.repeat_succ, list.prod_cons, ih, pow_succ] }
end
@[simp, priority 500]
theorem sum_repeat {α : Type*} [add_monoid α] :
∀ (a : α) (n : ℕ), (list.repeat a n).sum = n • a :=
@list.prod_repeat (multiplicative α) _
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
/-- If zero is an element of a list `L`, then `list.prod L = 0`. If the domain is a nontrivial
monoid with zero with no divisors, then this implication becomes an `iff`, see
`list.prod_eq_zero_iff`. -/
theorem prod_eq_zero {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] {L : list M₀} (h : (0 : M₀) ∈ L) :
L.prod = 0 :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ exact absurd h (not_mem_nil _) },
{ rw prod_cons,
cases (mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h with ha hL,
exacts [mul_eq_zero_of_left ha.symm _, mul_eq_zero_of_right _ (ihL hL)] }
end
/-- Product of elements of a list `L` equals zero if and only if `0 ∈ L`. See also
`list.prod_eq_zero` for an implication that needs weaker typeclass assumptions. -/
@[simp] theorem prod_eq_zero_iff {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] [nontrivial M₀]
[no_zero_divisors M₀] {L : list M₀} :
L.prod = 0 ↔ (0 : M₀) ∈ L :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ simp },
{ rw [prod_cons, mul_eq_zero, ihL, mem_cons_iff, eq_comm] }
end
theorem prod_ne_zero {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] [nontrivial M₀] [no_zero_divisors M₀]
{L : list M₀} (hL : (0 : M₀) ∉ L) : L.prod ≠ 0 :=
mt prod_eq_zero_iff.1 hL
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (l : list α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom [monoid β] (l : list α) (f : α →* β) :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, f.map_one.symm],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 f.map_mul }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_is_unit [monoid β] : Π {L : list β} (u : ∀ m ∈ L, is_unit m), is_unit L.prod
| [] _ := by simp
| (h :: t) u :=
begin
simp only [list.prod_cons],
exact is_unit.mul (u h (mem_cons_self h t)) (prod_is_unit (λ m mt, u m (mem_cons_of_mem h mt)))
end
-- `to_additive` chokes on the next few lemmas, so we do them by hand below
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc], }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list α) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
lemma prod_update_nth : ∀ (L : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α),
(L.update_nth n a).prod =
(L.take n).prod * (if n < L.length then a else 1) * (L.drop (n + 1)).prod
| (x::xs) 0 a := by simp [update_nth]
| (x::xs) (i+1) a := by simp [update_nth, prod_update_nth xs i a, mul_assoc]
| [] _ _ := by simp [update_nth, (nat.zero_le _).not_lt]
end monoid
section group
variables [group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv_rev` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg_rev`"]
lemma prod_inv_reverse : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).reverse.prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [prod_inv_reverse xs]
/-- A non-commutative variant of `list.prod_reverse` -/
@[to_additive "A non-commutative variant of `list.sum_reverse`"]
lemma prod_reverse_noncomm : ∀ (L : list α), L.reverse.prod = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod⁻¹ :=
by simp [prod_inv_reverse]
end group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg`"]
lemma prod_inv : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [mul_comm, prod_inv xs]
end comm_group
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_add_sum_drop [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).sum + (L.drop i).sum = L.sum
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, add_assoc, sum_take_add_sum_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_succ [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L.take i).sum + L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, sum_take_succ, add_assoc], }
lemma eq_of_sum_take_eq [add_left_cancel_monoid α] {L L' : list α} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).sum = (L'.take i).sum) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L'.take (i + 1)).sum := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [sum_take_succ L i h₁, sum_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
exact add_left_cancel this
end
lemma monotone_sum_take [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (L : list α) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).sum) :=
begin
apply monotone_of_monotone_nat (λ n, _),
by_cases h : n < L.length,
{ rw sum_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_self_add },
{ push_neg at h,
simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
1 ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih,
{ simp },
rw prod_cons,
exact one_le_mul (hl₁ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)) (ih (λ x h, hl₁ x (mem_cons_of_mem hd h))),
end
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
simp_rw [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at ⊢ hl₁,
split,
{ exact le_mul_of_one_le_right' (one_le_prod_of_one_le hl₁.2) },
{ exact λ x H, le_mul_of_one_le_of_le hl₁.1 (l_ih hl₁.right x H) },
end
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one [ordered_comm_monoid α]
{l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) (hl₂ : l.prod = 1) :
∀ x ∈ l, x = (1 : α) :=
λ x hx, le_antisymm (hl₂ ▸ single_le_prod hl₁ _ hx) (hl₁ x hx)
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (l : list α) :
l.sum = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, x = (0 : α) :=
⟨all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero (λ _ _, zero_le _),
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
{ intro h,
rw [sum_cons, add_eq_zero_iff],
rw forall_mem_cons at h,
exact ⟨h.1, l_ih h.2⟩ },
end⟩
/-- A list with sum not zero must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero [add_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : L.sum ≠ 0) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
/-- If all elements in a list are bounded below by `1`, then the length of the list is bounded
by the sum of the elements. -/
lemma length_le_sum_of_one_le (L : list ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, 1 ≤ i) : L.length ≤ L.sum :=
begin
induction L with j L IH h, { simp },
rw [sum_cons, length, add_comm],
exact add_le_add (h _ (set.mem_insert _ _)) (IH (λ i hi, h i (set.mem_union_right _ hi)))
end
-- Now we tie those lemmas back to their multiplicative versions.
attribute [to_additive] prod_take_mul_prod_drop prod_take_succ length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
/-- A list with positive sum must have positive length. -/
-- This is an easy consequence of `length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero`, but often useful in applications.
lemma length_pos_of_sum_pos [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : 0 < L.sum) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero L (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_monoid α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, a ∣ x) : a ∣ l.sum :=
begin
induction l with x l ih,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
{ rw [list.sum_cons],
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx))) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
lemma exists_lt_of_sum_lt [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum < (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x < g x :=
begin
induction l with x l,
{ exfalso, exact lt_irrefl _ h },
{ by_cases h' : f x < g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases l_ih _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩, refine ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ add_le_add_right (le_of_not_gt h') _) }
end
lemma exists_le_of_sum_le [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(hl : l ≠ []) (f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ contradiction },
{ by_cases h' : f x ≤ g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases exists_lt_of_sum_lt f g _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, le_of_lt h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_le_of_lt h $ add_lt_add_right (lt_of_not_ge h') _) }
end
-- Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
-- These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`,
-- but because `L.head` relies on an inhabited instances and
-- returns a garbage value for the empty list, this is not possible.
-- Instead we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`,
-- and below, restate the lemma just for `ℕ`.
@[to_additive]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod' [monoid α] (L : list α) :
(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * L.tail.prod = L.prod :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum :=
nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel]
section
variables {G : Type*} [comm_group G]
attribute [to_additive] alternating_prod
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_nil :
alternating_prod ([] : list G) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_singleton (g : G) :
alternating_prod [g] = g := rfl
@[simp, to_additive alternating_sum_cons_cons']
lemma alternating_prod_cons_cons (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_prod (g :: h :: l) = g * h⁻¹ * alternating_prod l := rfl
lemma alternating_sum_cons_cons {G : Type*} [add_comm_group G] (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_sum (g :: h :: l) = g - h + alternating_sum l :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, alternating_sum]
end
/-! ### join -/
attribute [simp] join
@[simp] theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
@[simp] theorem join_filter_empty_eq_ff [decidable_pred (λ l : list α, l.empty = ff)] :
∀ {L : list (list α)}, join (L.filter (λ l, l.empty = ff)) = L.join
| [] := rfl
| ([]::L) := by simp [@join_filter_empty_eq_ff L]
| ((a::l)::L) := by simp [@join_filter_empty_eq_ff L]
@[simp] theorem join_filter_ne_nil [decidable_pred (λ l : list α, l ≠ [])] {L : list (list α)} :
join (L.filter (λ l, l ≠ [])) = L.join :=
by simp [join_filter_empty_eq_ff, ← empty_iff_eq_nil]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
/-! ### lexicographic ordering -/
/-- Given a strict order `<` on `α`, the lexicographic strict order on `list α`, for which
`[a0, ..., an] < [b0, ..., b_k]` if `a0 < b0` or `a0 = b0` and `[a1, ..., an] < [b1, ..., bk]`.
The definition is given for any relation `r`, not only strict orders. -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nil_right (r : α → α → Prop) (l : list α) : ¬ lex r l [].
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem _root_.decidable.list.lex.ne_iff [decidable_eq α]
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ by_cases ab : a = b,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
by classical; exact decidable.list.lex.ne_iff H
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
/-! ### all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem [has_sizeof α] {x : α} {l : list α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
sizeof x < sizeof l :=
begin
induction l with h t ih; cases hx,
{ rw hx, exact lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg (lt_one_add _) (nat.zero_le _) },
{ exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le (zero_lt_one_add _) (le_of_lt (ih hx)) }
end
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (g : ∀ b, p b → γ) (f : α → β)
(l H) : pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (λ a h, g (f a) h) l (λ a h, H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h)) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
@[simp] lemma pmap_eq_nil {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : pmap f l H = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by rw [← length_eq_zero, length_pmap, length_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma attach_eq_nil (l : list α) : l.attach = [] ↔ l = [] := pmap_eq_nil
lemma last_pmap {α β : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l : list α) (hl₁ : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (hl₂ : l ≠ []) :
(l.pmap f hl₁).last (mt list.pmap_eq_nil.1 hl₂) = f (l.last hl₂) (hl₁ _ (list.last_mem hl₂)) :=
begin
induction l with l_hd l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl₂ rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ apply l_ih } }
end
lemma nth_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) {l : list α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (n : ℕ) :
nth (pmap f l h) n = option.pmap f (nth l n) (λ x H, h x (nth_mem H)) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp },
{ cases n; simp [hl] }
end
lemma nth_le_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) {l : list α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
nth_le (pmap f l h) n hn = f (nth_le l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))
(h _ (nth_le_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp only [length, pmap] at hn,
exact absurd hn (not_lt_of_le n.zero_le) },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simpa [hl] } }
end
/-! ### find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-! ### lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/-! ### filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
lemma filter_map_append {α β : Type*} (l l' : list α) (f : α → option β) :
filter_map f (l ++ l') = filter_map f l ++ filter_map f l' :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ rw [cons_append, filter_map, filter_map],
cases f hd;
simp only [filter_map, hl, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, and_self] }
end
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem sublist.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ s.filter_map _
/-! ### reduce_option -/
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_some (x : α) (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (some x :: l) = x :: l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_none (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (none :: l) = l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_nil : @reduce_option α [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_map {l : list (option α)} {f : α → β} :
reduce_option (map (option.map f) l) = map f (reduce_option l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases hd;
simpa only [true_and, option.map_some', map, eq_self_iff_true,
reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl },
end
lemma reduce_option_append (l l' : list (option α)) :
(l ++ l').reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ l'.reduce_option :=
filter_map_append l l' id
lemma reduce_option_length_le (l : list (option α)) :
l.reduce_option.length ≤ l.length :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, length] },
{ cases hd,
{ exact nat.le_succ_of_le hl },
{ simpa only [length, add_le_add_iff_right, reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl} }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_eq_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length = l.length ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, option.is_some x :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [forall_const, reduce_option_nil, not_mem_nil,
forall_prop_of_false, eq_self_iff_true, length, not_false_iff] },
{ cases hd,
{ simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, bool.coe_sort_ff, false_and,
reduce_option_cons_of_none, length, option.is_some_none, iff_false],
intro H,
have := reduce_option_length_le tl,
rw H at this,
exact absurd (nat.lt_succ_self _) (not_lt_of_le this) },
{ simp only [hl, true_and, mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, add_left_inj,
bool.coe_sort_tt, length, option.is_some_some, reduce_option_cons_of_some] } }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_lt_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length < l.length ↔ none ∈ l :=
begin
rw [(reduce_option_length_le l).lt_iff_ne, ne, reduce_option_length_eq_iff],
induction l; simp *,
rw [eq_comm, ← option.not_is_some_iff_eq_none, decidable.imp_iff_not_or]
end
lemma reduce_option_singleton (x : option α) :
[x].reduce_option = x.to_list :=
by cases x; refl
lemma reduce_option_concat (l : list (option α)) (x : option α) :
(l.concat x).reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ x.to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing x,
{ cases x;
simp [option.to_list] },
{ simp only [concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append] at hl,
cases hd;
simp [hl, reduce_option_append] }
end
lemma reduce_option_concat_of_some (l : list (option α)) (x : α) :
(l.concat (some x)).reduce_option = l.reduce_option.concat x :=
by simp only [reduce_option_nil, concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append, reduce_option_cons_of_some]
lemma reduce_option_mem_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
x ∈ l.reduce_option ↔ (some x) ∈ l :=
by simp only [reduce_option, id.def, mem_filter_map, exists_eq_right]
lemma reduce_option_nth_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
(∃ i, l.nth i = some (some x)) ↔ ∃ i, l.reduce_option.nth i = some x :=
by rw [←mem_iff_nth, ←mem_iff_nth, reduce_option_mem_iff]
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p l = foldr (λ a out, if p a then a :: out else out) [] l :=
by induction l; simp [*, filter]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj, ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
variable (p)
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_filter p ▸ s.filter_map _
theorem map_filter (f : β → α) (l : list β) :
filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter (q) [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma filter_true {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, true)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, true) h l = l :=
by convert filter_eq_self.2 (λ _ _, trivial)
@[simp] lemma filter_false {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, false)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, false) h l = [] :=
by convert filter_eq_nil.2 (λ _ _, id)
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop : ∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) :=
if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop : ∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append,
take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)];
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter p s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_tail : Π (l : list α) (a : α) (h : 0 < l.length),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - ite (a = list.nth_le l 0 h) 1 0
| (_ :: _) a h := by { rw [count_cons], split_ifs; simp }
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist _
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append _
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by simp [-add_comm]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
decidable.by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
theorem repeat_count_eq_of_count_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = length l) :
repeat a (count a l) = l :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq (le_count_iff_repeat_sublist.mp (le_refl (count a l)))
(eq.trans (length_repeat a (count a l)) h)
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) :=
by rw ← list.append_assoc; apply infix_append
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_infix_nil {l : list α} : l <:+: [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_infix_nil, λ h, h ▸ infix_refl _⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_prefix_nil {l : list α} : l <+: [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_prefix_nil, λ h, h ▸ prefix_refl _⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_suffix_nil {l : list α} : l <:+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_suffix_nil, λ h, h ▸ suffix_refl _⟩
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem suffix_cons_iff {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ x :: l₂ ↔ l₁ = x :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, hl₃⟩,
{ exact or.inl hl₃ },
{ simp only [cons_append] at hl₃,
exact or.inr ⟨_, hl₃.2⟩ } },
{ rintro (rfl | hl₁),
{ exact (x :: l₂).suffix_refl },
{ exact hl₁.trans (l₂.suffix_cons _) } }
end
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_right_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem tail_suffix (l : list α) : tail l <:+ l := by rw ← drop_one; apply drop_suffix
lemma tail_sublist (l : list α) : l.tail <+ l := sublist_of_suffix (tail_suffix l)
theorem tail_subset (l : list α) : tail l ⊆ l := (tail_sublist l).subset
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
lemma prefix_take_le_iff {L : list (list (option α))} {m n : ℕ} (hm : m < L.length) :
(take m L) <+: (take n L) ↔ m ≤ n :=
begin
simp only [prefix_iff_eq_take, length_take],
induction m with m IH generalizing L n,
{ simp only [min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, nat.zero_le, take] },
{ cases n,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, take, take_nil],
split,
{ cases L,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff, take] } },
{ intro h,
contradiction } },
{ cases L with l ls,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [length] at hm,
specialize @IH ls n (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm),
simp only [le_of_lt (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm), min_eq_left] at IH,
simp only [le_of_lt hm, IH, true_and, min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, length, take],
exact ⟨nat.succ_le_succ, nat.le_of_succ_le_succ⟩ } } },
end
lemma cons_prefix_iff {l l' : list α} {x y : α} :
x :: l <+: y :: l' ↔ x = y ∧ l <+: l' :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨L, hL⟩,
simp only [cons_append] at hL,
exact ⟨hL.left, ⟨L, hL.right⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨rfl, h⟩,
rwa [prefix_cons_inj] },
end
lemma map_prefix {l l' : list α} (f : α → β) (h : l <+: l') :
l.map f <+: l'.map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
simp only [h, prefix_cons_inj, hl, map] } },
end
lemma is_prefix.filter_map {l l' : list α} (h : l <+: l') (f : α → option β) :
l.filter_map f <+: l'.filter_map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, filter_map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
rw [←@singleton_append _ hd _, ←@singleton_append _ hd' _, filter_map_append,
filter_map_append, h.left, prefix_append_right_inj],
exact hl h.right } },
end
lemma is_prefix.reduce_option {l l' : list (option α)} (h : l <+: l') :
l.reduce_option <+: l'.reduce_option :=
h.filter_map id
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton];
exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t];
exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
lemma inits_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : inits (a :: l) = [] :: l.inits.map (λ t, a :: t) :=
by simp
lemma tails_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tails (a :: l) = (a :: l) :: l.tails :=
by simp
@[simp]
lemma inits_append : ∀ (s t : list α), inits (s ++ t) = s.inits ++ t.inits.tail.map (λ l, s ++ l)
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [inits_append s t]
@[simp]
lemma tails_append : ∀ (s t : list α), tails (s ++ t) = s.tails.map (λ l, l ++ t) ++ t.tails.tail
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [tails_append s t]
-- the lemma names `inits_eq_tails` and `tails_eq_inits` are like `sublists_eq_sublists'`
lemma inits_eq_tails :
∀ (l : list α), l.inits = (reverse $ map reverse $ tails $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [inits_eq_tails l, map_eq_map_iff]
lemma tails_eq_inits :
∀ (l : list α), l.tails = (reverse $ map reverse $ inits $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [tails_eq_inits l, append_left_inj]
lemma inits_reverse (l : list α) : inits (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.tails) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma tails_reverse (l : list α) : tails (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.inits) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_inits (l : list α) : map reverse l.inits = (reverse $ tails $ reverse l) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_tails (l : list α) : map reverse l.tails = (reverse $ inits $ reverse l) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/-! ### permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/-! ### insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp, priority 970]
theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/-! ### erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) :
(a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
(erasep_sublist l).subset
theorem sublist.erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
(erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact sublist.erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s a) = pred (count a s)
| [] := by simp
| (h :: t) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
by_cases p : h = a,
{ rw [if_pos p, count_cons', if_pos p.symm], simp },
{ rw [if_neg p, count_cons', count_cons', if_neg (λ x : a = h, p x.symm), count_erase_self],
simp, }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s b) = count a s
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [count_cons', h, if_neg ab], simp },
{ rw [count_cons', count_cons', count_erase_of_ne] }
end
end erase
/-! ### diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
lemma diff_cons_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.diff l₂).erase a :=
begin
induction l₂ with b l₂ ih generalizing l₁ a,
{ simp_rw [diff_cons, diff_nil] },
{ rw [diff_cons, diff_cons, erase_comm, ← diff_cons, ih, ← diff_cons] }
end
lemma diff_erase (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : (l₁.diff l₂).erase a = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
by rw [← diff_cons_right, diff_cons]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
(diff_sublist _ _).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons,
erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (h.erase b)
end diff
/-! ### enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
theorem mem_enum_from {x : α} {i : ℕ} :
∀ {j : ℕ} (xs : list α), (i, x) ∈ xs.enum_from j → j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs
| j [] := by simp [enum_from]
| j (y :: ys) :=
suffices i = j ∧ x = y ∨ (i, x) ∈ enum_from (j + 1) ys →
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + (length ys + 1) ∧ (x = y ∨ x ∈ ys),
by simpa [enum_from, mem_enum_from ys],
begin
rintro (h|h),
{ refine ⟨le_of_eq h.1.symm,h.1 ▸ _,or.inl h.2⟩,
apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right; simp },
{ obtain ⟨hji, hijlen, hmem⟩ := mem_enum_from _ h,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_succ _) hji },
{ convert hijlen using 1, ac_refl },
{ simp [hmem] } }
end
/-! ### product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/-! ### sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : list α) : disjoint l [] :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_take_drop {l : list α} {m n : ℕ} (hl : l.nodup) (h : m ≤ n) :
disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n) :=
begin
induction l generalizing m n,
case list.nil : m n
{ simp },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih m n
{ cases m; cases n; simp only [disjoint_cons_left, mem_cons_iff, disjoint_cons_right, drop,
true_or, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and,
disjoint_nil_left, take],
{ cases h },
cases hl with _ _ h₀ h₁, split,
{ intro h, exact h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, },
solve_by_elim [le_of_succ_le_succ] { max_depth := 4 } },
end
end disjoint
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff,
mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h];
split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/-! ### inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
@[simp] lemma inter_reverse {xs ys : list α} :
xs.inter ys.reverse = xs.inter ys :=
by simp only [list.inter, mem_reverse]; congr
end inter
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
/-! ### map₂_left' -/
section map₂_left'
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left'` can already be used by the
-- simplifie because `map₂_left'` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left'_nil_right (f : α → option β → γ) (as) :
map₂_left' f as [] = (as.map (λ a, f a none), []) :=
by cases as; refl
end map₂_left'
/-! ### map₂_right' -/
section map₂_right'
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_left :
map₂_right' f [] bs = (bs.map (f none), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_right :
map₂_right' f as [] = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_cons :
map₂_right' f [] (b :: bs) = (f none b :: bs.map (f none), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_cons_cons :
map₂_right' f (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := map₂_right' f as bs in
(f (some a) b :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end map₂_right'
/-! ### zip_left' -/
section zip_left'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_right :
zip_left' as ([] : list β) = (as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_left :
zip_left' ([] : list α) bs = ([], bs) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_nil :
zip_left' (a :: as) ([] : list β) = ((a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_cons :
zip_left' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_left' as bs in
((a, some b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_left'
/-! ### zip_right' -/
section zip_right'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_left :
zip_right' ([] : list α) bs = (bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_right :
zip_right' as ([] : list β) = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_cons :
zip_right' ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = ((none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_cons_cons :
zip_right' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_right' as bs in
((some a, b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_right'
/-! ### map₂_left -/
section map₂_left
variables (f : α → option β → γ) (as : list α)
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left` can already be used by the
-- simplifier because `map₂_left` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left_nil_right :
map₂_left f as [] = as.map (λ a, f a none) :=
by cases as; refl
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂_left' : ∀ as bs,
map₂_left f as bs = (map₂_left' f as bs).fst
| [] bs := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] := by simp!
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by simp! [*]
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂ : ∀ as bs,
length as ≤ length bs →
map₂_left f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f a (some b)) as bs
| [] [] h := by simp!
| [] (b :: bs) h := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] h := by { simp at h, contradiction }
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) h := by { simp at h, simp! [*] }
end map₂_left
/-! ### map₂_right -/
section map₂_right
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_left :
map₂_right f [] bs = bs.map (f none) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_right :
map₂_right f as [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_cons :
map₂_right f [] (b :: bs) = f none b :: bs.map (f none) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_cons_cons :
map₂_right f (a :: as) (b :: bs) = f (some a) b :: map₂_right f as bs :=
rfl
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂_right' :
map₂_right f as bs = (map₂_right' f as bs).fst :=
by simp only [map₂_right, map₂_right', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂ (h : length bs ≤ length as) :
map₂_right f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f (some a) b) as bs :=
begin
have : (λ a b, flip f a (some b)) = (flip (λ a b, f (some a) b)) := rfl,
simp only [map₂_right, map₂_left_eq_map₂, map₂_flip, *]
end
end map₂_right
/-! ### zip_left -/
section zip_left
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_right :
zip_left as ([] : list β) = as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_left :
zip_left ([] : list α) bs = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_nil :
zip_left (a :: as) ([] : list β) = (a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_cons :
zip_left (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (a, some b) :: zip_left as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_left_eq_zip_left' :
zip_left as bs = (zip_left' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_left, zip_left', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
end zip_left
/-! ### zip_right -/
section zip_right
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_left :
zip_right ([] : list α) bs = bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_right :
zip_right as ([] : list β) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_cons :
zip_right ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = (none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_cons_cons :
zip_right (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (some a, b) :: zip_right as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_right_eq_zip_right' :
zip_right as bs = (zip_right' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_right, zip_right', map₂_right_eq_map₂_right']
end zip_right
/-! ### to_chunks -/
section to_chunks
@[simp] theorem to_chunks_nil (n) : @to_chunks α n [] = [] := by cases n; refl
theorem to_chunks_aux_eq (n) : ∀ xs i,
@to_chunks_aux α n xs i = (xs.take i, (xs.drop i).to_chunks (n+1))
| [] i := by cases i; refl
| (x::xs) 0 := by rw [to_chunks_aux, drop, to_chunks]; cases to_chunks_aux n xs n; refl
| (x::xs) (i+1) := by rw [to_chunks_aux, to_chunks_aux_eq]; refl
theorem to_chunks_eq_cons' (n) : ∀ {xs : list α} (h : xs ≠ []),
xs.to_chunks (n+1) = xs.take (n+1) :: (xs.drop (n+1)).to_chunks (n+1)
| [] e := (e rfl).elim
| (x::xs) _ := by rw [to_chunks, to_chunks_aux_eq]; refl
theorem to_chunks_eq_cons : ∀ {n} {xs : list α} (n0 : n ≠ 0) (x0 : xs ≠ []),
xs.to_chunks n = xs.take n :: (xs.drop n).to_chunks n
| 0 _ e := (e rfl).elim
| (n+1) xs _ := to_chunks_eq_cons' _
theorem to_chunks_aux_join {n} : ∀ {xs i l L}, @to_chunks_aux α n xs i = (l, L) → l ++ L.join = xs
| [] _ _ _ rfl := rfl
| (x::xs) i l L e := begin
cases i; [
cases e' : to_chunks_aux n xs n with l L,
cases e' : to_chunks_aux n xs i with l L];
{ rw [to_chunks_aux, e', to_chunks_aux] at e, cases e,
exact (congr_arg (cons x) (to_chunks_aux_join e') : _) }
end
@[simp] theorem to_chunks_join : ∀ n xs, (@to_chunks α n xs).join = xs
| n [] := by cases n; refl
| 0 (x::xs) := by simp only [to_chunks, join]; rw append_nil
| (n+1) (x::xs) := begin
rw to_chunks,
cases e : to_chunks_aux n xs n with l L,
exact (congr_arg (cons x) (to_chunks_aux_join e) : _),
end
theorem to_chunks_length_le : ∀ n xs, n ≠ 0 → ∀ l : list α,
l ∈ @to_chunks α n xs → l.length ≤ n
| 0 _ e _ := (e rfl).elim
| (n+1) xs _ l := begin
refine (measure_wf length).induction xs _, intros xs IH h,
by_cases x0 : xs = [], {subst xs, cases h},
rw to_chunks_eq_cons' _ x0 at h, rcases h with rfl|h,
{ apply length_take_le },
{ refine IH _ _ h,
simp only [measure, inv_image, length_drop],
exact nat.sub_lt_self (length_pos_iff_ne_nil.2 x0) (succ_pos _) },
end
end to_chunks
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem ilast'_mem : ∀ a l, @ilast' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (ilast'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
end list
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_list_prod {α β : Type*} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) (l : list α) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace list
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (L : list α) (f : α → β) (g : β →* γ) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by {rw g.map_list_prod, exact congr_arg _ (map_map _ _ _).symm}
theorem sum_map_mul_left {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, r * f b)).sum = r * (L.map f).sum :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_left r
theorem sum_map_mul_right {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, f b * r)).sum = (L.map f).sum * r :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_right r
universes u v
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_swap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (x : α) (y : β) (xs : list (α × β)) :
(y, x) ∈ map prod.swap xs ↔ (x, y) ∈ xs :=
begin
induction xs with x xs,
{ simp only [not_mem_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases x with a b,
simp only [mem_cons_iff, prod.mk.inj_iff, map, prod.swap_prod_mk,
prod.exists, xs_ih, and_comm] },
end
lemma slice_eq {α} (xs : list α) (n m : ℕ) :
slice n m xs = xs.take n ++ xs.drop (n+m) :=
begin
induction n generalizing xs,
{ simp [slice] },
{ cases xs; simp [slice, *, nat.succ_add], }
end
lemma sizeof_slice_lt {α} [has_sizeof α] (i j : ℕ) (hj : 0 < j) (xs : list α) (hi : i < xs.length) :
sizeof (list.slice i j xs) < sizeof xs :=
begin
induction xs generalizing i j,
case list.nil : i j h
{ cases hi },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih i j h
{ cases i; simp only [-slice_eq, list.slice],
{ cases j, cases h,
dsimp only [drop], unfold_wf,
apply @lt_of_le_of_lt _ _ _ xs.sizeof,
{ clear_except,
induction xs generalizing j; unfold_wf,
case list.nil : j
{ refl },
case list.cons : xs_hd xs_tl xs_ih j
{ cases j; unfold_wf, refl,
transitivity, apply xs_ih,
simp }, },
unfold_wf, apply zero_lt_one_add, },
{ unfold_wf, apply xs_ih _ _ h,
apply lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi, } },
end
end list
|
543245e315775e623b66471c5b0f39c673cbddea | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/field_theory/mv_polynomial.lean | 395b6334349f2451df2a77c9661375c1e4aededa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,355 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl
Multivariate functions of the form `α^n → α` are isomorphic to multivariate polynomials in
`n` variables.
-/
import linear_algebra.finsupp_vector_space
import algebra.char_p
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open set linear_map submodule
open_locale big_operators
namespace mv_polynomial
universes u v
variables {σ : Type u} {α : Type v}
section
variables (σ α) [field α] (m : ℕ)
def restrict_total_degree : submodule α (mv_polynomial σ α) :=
finsupp.supported _ _ {n | n.sum (λn e, e) ≤ m }
lemma mem_restrict_total_degree (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
p ∈ restrict_total_degree σ α m ↔ p.total_degree ≤ m :=
begin
rw [total_degree, finset.sup_le_iff],
refl
end
end
section
variables (σ α)
def restrict_degree (m : ℕ) [field α] : submodule α (mv_polynomial σ α) :=
finsupp.supported _ _ {n | ∀i, n i ≤ m }
end
lemma mem_restrict_degree [field α] (p : mv_polynomial σ α) (n : ℕ) :
p ∈ restrict_degree σ α n ↔ (∀s ∈ p.support, ∀i, (s : σ →₀ ℕ) i ≤ n) :=
begin
rw [restrict_degree, finsupp.mem_supported],
refl
end
lemma mem_restrict_degree_iff_sup [field α] (p : mv_polynomial σ α) (n : ℕ) :
p ∈ restrict_degree σ α n ↔ ∀i, p.degrees.count i ≤ n :=
begin
simp only [mem_restrict_degree, degrees, multiset.count_sup, finsupp.count_to_multiset,
finset.sup_le_iff],
exact ⟨assume h n s hs, h s hs n, assume h s hs n, h n s hs⟩
end
lemma map_range_eq_map {β : Type*} [comm_ring α] [comm_ring β] (p : mv_polynomial σ α)
(f : α →+* β) :
finsupp.map_range f f.map_zero p = map f p :=
begin
rw [← finsupp.sum_single p, finsupp.sum],
-- It's not great that we need to use an `erw` here,
-- but hopefully it will become smoother when we move entirely away from `is_semiring_hom`.
erw [finsupp.map_range_finset_sum (f : α →+ β)],
rw [← p.support.sum_hom (map f)],
{ refine finset.sum_congr rfl (assume n _, _),
rw [finsupp.map_range_single, ← monomial, ← monomial, map_monomial], refl, },
apply_instance
end
section
variables (σ α)
lemma is_basis_monomials [field α] :
is_basis α ((λs, (monomial s 1 : mv_polynomial σ α))) :=
suffices is_basis α (λ (sa : Σ _, unit), (monomial sa.1 1 : mv_polynomial σ α)),
begin
apply is_basis.comp this (λ (s : σ →₀ ℕ), ⟨s, punit.star⟩),
split,
{ intros x y hxy,
simpa using hxy },
{ intros x,
rcases x with ⟨x₁, x₂⟩,
use x₁,
rw punit_eq punit.star x₂ }
end,
begin
apply finsupp.is_basis_single (λ _ _, (1 : α)),
intro _,
apply is_basis_singleton_one,
end
end
end mv_polynomial
namespace mv_polynomial
universe u
variables (σ : Type u) (α : Type u) [field α]
open_locale classical
lemma dim_mv_polynomial : vector_space.dim α (mv_polynomial σ α) = cardinal.mk (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
by rw [← cardinal.lift_inj, ← (is_basis_monomials σ α).mk_eq_dim]
end mv_polynomial
namespace mv_polynomial
variables (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] (p : ℕ)
instance [char_p R p] : char_p (mv_polynomial σ R) p :=
{ cast_eq_zero_iff := λ n, by rw [← C_eq_coe_nat, ← C_0, C_inj, char_p.cast_eq_zero_iff R p] }
end mv_polynomial
|
3d4671f8e5902e9c8d6dc2957a90f2d5f442fc0e | a51edd9a1700339fa6dc7dc428eb5dfa3994b8bc | /src/misc/keyed_array.lean | 4f410c92aa07c64d61aa5583fe7b23bbc0c383ce | [] | no_license | avigad/formal_logic | 83f5c0534b3e9e7da53eff01bb82289daad65555 | 59d7fe7cb7a7927fb72d89d4fd40965bcd769349 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,302,642,116 | 1,541,000,469,000 | 1,541,000,469,000 | 146,376,915 | 1 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,645 | lean | /-
A keyed_array is an array of data, each with a string key. The array index acts as a unique id. The
rbmap provides the inverse: given a key, it finds the index.
-/
import data.list
structure keyed_array (α : Type*) :=
(size : nat) (array : array size (string × α)) (rbmap : rbmap string nat)
namespace keyed_array
def read_key_safe {α : Type*} (k : keyed_array α) {i : nat} (h : i < k.size) :=
(k.array.read ⟨i, h⟩).1
def read_safe {α : Type*} (k : keyed_array α) {i : nat} (h : i < k.size) :=
(k.array.read ⟨i, h⟩).2
def read_key {α : Type*} (k : keyed_array α) (i : nat) : option string :=
if h : i < k.size then some (k.read_key_safe h) else none
def read {α : Type*} (k : keyed_array α) (i : nat) : option α :=
if h : i < k.size then some (k.read_safe h) else none
def find {α : Type*} (k : keyed_array α) (s : string) : option nat :=
k.rbmap.find s
def is_sound {α : Type*} (k : keyed_array α) : Prop :=
(∀ i (h : i < k.size), k.find (k.read_key_safe h) = some i) ∧
(∀ s i, k.find s = some i → ∃ h : i < k.size, k.read_key_safe h = s)
end keyed_array
namespace list
private def to_rbmap_aux {α : Type*} : ℕ → list (string × α) → rbmap string nat
| n [] := mk_rbmap string nat
| n ((k, d) :: l) := (to_rbmap_aux (n+1) l).insert k n
private def to_rbmap {α : Type*} (l : list (string × α)) : rbmap string nat :=
to_rbmap_aux 0 l
def to_keyed_array {α : Type*} (l : list (string × α)) : keyed_array α :=
⟨l.length, l.to_array, to_rbmap l⟩
-- TODO: show this gives a sound keyed_array if there are no duplicates on the list.
end list
|
bb9007b59e49f21d518999f5617f1e671c216ab9 | 6df8d5ae3acf20ad0d7f0247d2cee1957ef96df1 | /ExamPractice/Exam-1-Practice.lean | c2b36419c5b8e62623cbcbbbfdf67e3d45769d7c | [] | no_license | derekjohnsonva/CS2102 | 8ed45daa6658e6121bac0f6691eac6147d08246d | b3f507d4be824a2511838a1054d04fc9aef3304c | refs/heads/master | 1,648,529,162,527 | 1,578,851,859,000 | 1,578,851,859,000 | 233,433,207 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,900 | lean | /-
Grading rubric. 7 points per question up to 100 max.
Partial credit by subproblem.
-/
/-
Note: An incorrect answer above or below
a correct answer can cause Lean to be unable
to process the correct answer. If you are not
able to complete a problem succesfully please
comment out your incomplete answer so that we
can see your work but so that your incomplete
work does not cause problems for surrounding
problems and answers.
-/
/-
PART I: Functions. Functions are an essential
element of the language of predicate logic. In
this section, you show that you understand how
to define, use, and reason about functions in
Lean.
-/
/- 1.
Study each of the following definitions,
then answer the associated question about
the types involved in these definitions.
-/
-- Consider this function
def f (n : ℕ) (s : string) := s
/-
a. What is it's return type? Answer: string
-/
/-
b. What is the type of (f 5)? Answer: string → string
-/
#check f 5
/-
c. What is the value of (f 0 "yay") "yay"
-/
#eval f 0 "yay"
/-
d. What is the type of this function? nat → string → string
-/
#check f
/- 2.
Define three functions called square,
square', and square'', each of type
ℕ to ℕ. Each function must return the
square of the value to which it is
applied. Write the first function in
"C" style, the second using a tactic
script, and the third using a lambda
abstraction. Declare argument and return
types explicitly in each case.
-/
def square (n : ℕ) : ℕ := n^2
def square' (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
begin
exact n^2
end
def square'' : ℕ → ℕ :=
λ n : ℕ, n^2
/- 3.
Construct three proofs to test your
function definitions. The first must
use "lemma" to define a proof, called
square_3_9, of the proposition that
(square 3) equals 9. The second must
use "theorem" to define a proof, called
square'_4_16, of the proposition that
square' applied to 4 reduces to 16. The
third must prove that square'' 5 is
equal to 25. This third proof must not
use the equals sign, =, but must use
"eq" instead to state the proposition
to be proved. Hint on #3, sometimes
you need to use parentheses to express
how you want terms to be grouped.
-/
lemma square_3_9 : square 3 = 9 := rfl
theorem square_4_16 : square' 4 = 16 := rfl
example : eq (square'' 5) 25 := rfl
/- 4.
Define a function called last_first.
It takes two string values, called
"first" and "last" (without quotes),
as arguments, and it returns a string
consisting of "last" followed by a
comma and a space followed by "first".
For example (first "Orson" "Welles").
Write a test case for your function to
prove that (last_first "Orson" "Welles")
is "Welles, Orson". Use "example", to
check the proof. Hint: The ++ operator
implements the string append function.
-/
def last_first (first last : string) :=
last ++ ", " ++ first
example: (last_first "Orson" "Welles") = "Welles, Orson" := rfl
/- 5.
Complete the following definition of a
function, called apply3. It takes, as an
argument, a function, you might call it f,
of type ℕ → ℕ. It must return a function,
also of type ℕ to ℕ, that, when applied
to a value, n, returns the result of
applying the given function, f, to the
given value, n, three times. That is, it
returns a function that computes f(f(f(n))).
-/
def apply3 : (ℕ → ℕ) → (ℕ → ℕ) :=
λ f : (ℕ → ℕ),
λ n, f (f (f n))
-- Just an extra sanity check, not required
#reduce apply3 (λ n, n^2) 2
/- 6.
The Lean libraries define a function,
string.length, that takes a string and
returns its length as a natural number.
Define a function, len2, that takes two
strings and returns the sum of their
lengths. You may use the ++ operator
but not the + operator in your answer.
Follow your function definition with a
test case in the form of a proof using
"example" showing that len2 applied to
"Orson" and "Welles" is 11.
-/
def len2 (s1 s2 : string) : ℕ :=
string.length (s1 ++ s2)
example : len2 "Orson" "Welles" = 11 := rfl
/- 7.
Use "example" to prove that there is a
function of the following type:
((ℕ → ℕ) → (ℕ → ℕ)) →
((ℕ → ℕ) → ℕ) →
((ℕ → ℕ) → ℕ)
-/
example :
((ℕ → ℕ) → (ℕ → ℕ)) →
((ℕ → ℕ) → ℕ) →
((ℕ → ℕ) → ℕ)
:= λ f g, g
/-
PART II: Functions, revited. In
mathematics, functions play a central
role. A function, f, in the mathematical
sense is a triple, f = { D, P, C }, where
D, a set, is the domain of definition of
f, C is the co-domain of f, and P is a
set of ordered pairs, each with a first
element from D and a second element from
C,. In addition, P has one additional
essential property, the subject of one
of the following questions.
-/
/- 8.
What one additional property is essential to
the definition of what it means for a triple,
{ D, P, C } to be a function?
Name the property. Answer: Single-Valued
Now explain precisely what it means: "That there
are no two pairs, (x, y) and (x', y') such that..."
Fill in the blank, and use a logical ∧ in answering.
You might also want to use = or ≠.
Answer: x = x' ∧ y ≠ y'
-/
/- 9.
Give names to the following concepts:
The set of all values appearing as the first
element of any pair in P.
Answer: domain
The set of all values appearing as the second
element of any pair in P.
Answer: range
The property that the set of all values
appearing as the first element of P is the
same as D.
Answer: total
Answer: The property that the set of all
values appearing as the first element of
P is the same as C.
Answer: surjective
The property of having both of the preceding
properties.
Answer: bijective
-/
/- 10.
What does it mean for a function, f, to be
injective? Give you answer by completing the
following sentences with logical expressions.
"A function, f, is said to be injective if
it has no two pairs, (x, y) and (x', y'),
such that ..."
Answer: x ≠ x' ∧ y = y'
In other words, "If (x, y) and (x', y') are
related by f and x ≠ x' then ..."
Answer: y ≠ y'
-/
/- 11.
Suppose that S and T are types and that f
is defined to be a function, *in Lean*, of
type S → T. Which of the following properties,
if any, does f necessarily have?
- N: injective
- N: surjective
- N: bijective
- N: one-to-many
- N: one-to-one
- N: onto
- Y: single-valued
- Y: partial (but not strictly partial)
- Y: total
Answer: single valued, total, partial (if we define partial functions
to include total functions)
-/
/-
PART III: Logic and Proof.
-/
/- 12a.
Use axiom and/or axioms in Lean to express,
in formal logic, the following assumptions:
- T is a type
- t1 and t2 are values of type T
- t1 = t2
Answer immediately after this comment block.
If you need to introduce a name, use eqt1t2.
-/
axiom T : Type
axioms t1 t2 : T
axiom eqt1t2 : t1 = t2
/- 12b.
Use axiom or axioms to represent the
additional assumptions that
- P is a property of objects of type T
- t1 has property P
If you need to use a name, use Pt1
-/
axiom P : T → Prop
axiom Pt1 : P t1
/- 12 c.
Now use "example" to assert, and then
prove, that t2 also has property P.
-/
example : P t2 := eq.subst eqt1t2 Pt1
/- 13 a.
Define eq_1_0 to be the proposition, 1 = 0.
-/
def eq_1_0 := 1 = 0
/- 13 b.
Define pf_eq_0_0 to be a proof of the
proposition that 0 = 0. Use the lemma
keyword.
-/
lemma pf_eq_0_0 : 0 = 0 := rfl
/- 13 c.
Write a function, w, that takes three
values, a, b, and c of type ℕ, and that
also takes proofs, cb : c = b, and
ba : b = a, and that returns a proof
that a = c.
-/
def w (a b c : ℕ) (cb : c = b) (ba : b = a) :
a = c :=
eq.trans (eq.symm ba) (eq.symm cb)
#check w
/- 13d.
What is the type of this function?
Answer: ∀ (a b c : ℕ), c = b → b = a → a = c
What is the form of this proposition?
Answer: universal generalization
What's the form the proposition after the
comma?
Answer: Implication
What is the premise of the proposition after
the comma?
Answer: c = b
-/
/- 14.
Complete the following proofs. Give each one
in the form indicate by a comment preceding
the statement of the conjecture to be proved.
When using tactic scripts, remember to write
begin/end pairs right away, so Lean knowns
you want to use a tactic script.
-/
-- lambda expression
example : ∀ (s : string), s = s :=
λ s, eq.refl s
-- lambda expresion
example : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∀ (m : ℕ), true :=
λ n m, true.intro
-- tactic script
example : ∀ (T : Type), ∀ (t : T), eq t t :=
begin
assume T t,
exact eq.refl t
end
-- tactic script
example :
∀ (T : Type),
∀ (P : T → Prop),
∀ t1 t2 : T,
∀ Pt1 : P t1,
∀ t2t1 : t2 = t1,
P t2 :=
begin
assume T P t1 t2 Pt1 t2t1,
exact eq.subst (eq.symm t2t1) Pt1
end
/-
The following problems involve implications.
For example, false → P in an implication. To
prove an implication, just show that there is
(by giving) a function of the specified type.
-/
-- lambda expression
example : ∀ (P : Prop), false → P :=
λ P, λ f, false.elim f
-- tactic script
example : ∀ (P : Prop), false → P :=
begin
assume P f,
exact false.elim f
end
-- lambda expression
example : ∀ (P Q : Prop), P ∧ Q → Q ∧ P :=
λ P Q pq, and.intro pq.right pq.left
-- tactic script
example : ∀ (P Q : Prop), P ∧ Q → Q ∧ P :=
begin
assume P Q pq,
exact and.intro pq.right pq.left
end
-- tactic script
example :
∀ T : Type,
∀ (t1 t2 t3 : T),
t1 = t2 ∧ t2 = t3 → t1 = t3 :=
begin
assume T t1 t2 t3 p,
exact eq.trans p.left p.right
end
/- 15.
Use Lean to model a world in which there
are Dogs, all Dogs are friendly, and Fido
is a Dog, then give a proof that in this
world, Fido must be friendly, too.
-/
axioms Dog : Type
axiom Fido : Dog
axiom Friendly : Dog → Prop
axiom allFriendly : ∀ d : Dog, Friendly d
-- proof is by application of forall elimination
example : Friendly Fido := allFriendly Fido |
cd5de459a053a5c7f9e472f2ab1dcb715d4efe2d | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/set/intervals/image_preimage.lean | bab08e24fcdd84a48295bc65caf261d9719a52df | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,625 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import data.set.intervals.basic
import data.equiv.mul_add
import algebra.pointwise
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
universe u
namespace set
section has_exists_add_of_le
/-!
The lemmas in this section state that addition maps intervals bijectively. The typeclass
`has_exists_add_of_le` is defined specifically to make them work when combined with
`ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid`; the lemmas below therefore apply to all
`ordered_add_comm_group`, but also to `ℕ` and `ℝ≥0`, which are not groups.
TODO : move as much as possible in this file to the setting of this weaker typeclass.
-/
variables {α : Type u} [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] [has_exists_add_of_le α] (a b d : α)
lemma Icc_add_bij : bij_on (+d) (Icc a b) (Icc (a + d) (b + d)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ _ h, ⟨add_le_add_right h.1 _, add_le_add_right h.2 _⟩,
λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h,
λ _ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h.1,
rw [mem_Icc, add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right, add_le_add_iff_right] at h,
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw add_right_comm⟩,
end
lemma Ioo_add_bij : bij_on (+d) (Ioo a b) (Ioo (a + d) (b + d)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ _ h, ⟨add_lt_add_right h.1 _, add_lt_add_right h.2 _⟩,
λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h,
λ _ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h.1.le,
rw [mem_Ioo, add_right_comm, add_lt_add_iff_right, add_lt_add_iff_right] at h,
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw add_right_comm⟩,
end
lemma Ioc_add_bij : bij_on (+d) (Ioc a b) (Ioc (a + d) (b + d)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ _ h, ⟨add_lt_add_right h.1 _, add_le_add_right h.2 _⟩,
λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h,
λ _ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h.1.le,
rw [mem_Ioc, add_right_comm, add_lt_add_iff_right, add_le_add_iff_right] at h,
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw add_right_comm⟩,
end
lemma Ico_add_bij : bij_on (+d) (Ico a b) (Ico (a + d) (b + d)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ _ h, ⟨add_le_add_right h.1 _, add_lt_add_right h.2 _⟩,
λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h,
λ _ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h.1,
rw [mem_Ico, add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right, add_lt_add_iff_right] at h,
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw add_right_comm⟩,
end
lemma Ici_add_bij : bij_on (+d) (Ici a) (Ici (a + d)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x h, add_le_add_right (mem_Ici.mp h) _, λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h, λ _ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (mem_Ici.mp h),
rw [mem_Ici, add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right] at h,
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw add_right_comm⟩,
end
lemma Ioi_add_bij : bij_on (+d) (Ioi a) (Ioi (a + d)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x h, add_lt_add_right (mem_Ioi.mp h) _, λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h, λ _ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (mem_Ioi.mp h).le,
rw [mem_Ioi, add_right_comm, add_lt_add_iff_right] at h,
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw add_right_comm⟩,
end
end has_exists_add_of_le
section ordered_add_comm_group
variables {G : Type u} [ordered_add_comm_group G] (a b c : G)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Ici : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Ici b) = Ici (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Ioi : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Ioi b) = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Iic : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Iic b) = Iic (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Iio : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Iio b) = Iio (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Icc : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Icc b c) = Icc (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Ico : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Ico b c) = Ico (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Ioc : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Ioc b c) = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_add_Ioo : (λ x, a + x) ⁻¹' (Ioo b c) = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Ici : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Ici b) = Ici (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Ioi : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Ioi b) = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Iic : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Iic b) = Iic (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Iio : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Iio b) = Iio (b - a) :=
ext $ λ x, lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Icc : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Icc b c) = Icc (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Ico : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Ico b c) = Ico (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Ioc : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Ioc b c) = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp] lemma preimage_add_const_Ioo : (λ x, x + a) ⁻¹' (Ioo b c) = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Ici : - Ici a = Iic (-a) := ext $ λ x, le_neg
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Iic : - Iic a = Ici (-a) := ext $ λ x, neg_le
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Ioi : - Ioi a = Iio (-a) := ext $ λ x, lt_neg
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Iio : - Iio a = Ioi (-a) := ext $ λ x, neg_lt
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Icc : - Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Ico : - Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Ioc : - Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_neg_Ioo : - Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Ici : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Ici b) = Ici (b + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Ioi b) = Ioi (b + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Iic : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Iic b) = Iic (b + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Iio : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Iio b) = Iio (b + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Icc : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Icc b c) = Icc (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Ico : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Ico b c) = Ico (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Ioc b c) = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (λ x, x - a) ⁻¹' (Ioo b c) = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Ici : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Ici b) = Iic (a - b) :=
ext $ λ x, le_sub
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Iic : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Iic b) = Ici (a - b) :=
ext $ λ x, sub_le
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Ioi b) = Iio (a - b) :=
ext $ λ x, lt_sub
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Iio : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Iio b) = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext $ λ x, sub_lt
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Icc : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Icc b c) = Icc (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Ico : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Ico b c) = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Ioc b c) = Ico (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (λ x, a - x) ⁻¹' (Ioo b c) = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Ici : (λ x, a + x) '' Ici b = Ici (a + b) :=
by simp [add_comm]
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Iic : (λ x, a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) :=
by simp [add_comm]
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Iio : (λ x, a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) :=
by simp [add_comm]
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Ioi : (λ x, a + x) '' Ioi b = Ioi (a + b) :=
by simp [add_comm]
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Icc : (λ x, a + x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a + b) (a + c) :=
by simp [add_comm]
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Ico : (λ x, a + x) '' Ico b c = Ico (a + b) (a + c) :=
by simp [add_comm]
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Ioc : (λ x, a + x) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (a + b) (a + c) :=
by simp [add_comm]
@[simp] lemma image_const_add_Ioo : (λ x, a + x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a + b) (a + c) :=
by simp [add_comm]
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Ici : (λ x, x + a) '' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by simp
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Iic : (λ x, x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Iio : (λ x, x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Ioi : (λ x, x + a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by simp
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Icc : (λ x, x + a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Ico : (λ x, x + a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Ioc : (λ x, x + a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma image_add_const_Ioo : (λ x, x + a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) :=
by simp
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
lemma image_neg_Ici : has_neg.neg '' (Ici a) = Iic (-a) := by simp
lemma image_neg_Iic : has_neg.neg '' (Iic a) = Ici (-a) := by simp
lemma image_neg_Ioi : has_neg.neg '' (Ioi a) = Iio (-a) := by simp
lemma image_neg_Iio : has_neg.neg '' (Iio a) = Ioi (-a) := by simp
lemma image_neg_Icc : has_neg.neg '' (Icc a b) = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
lemma image_neg_Ico : has_neg.neg '' (Ico a b) = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
lemma image_neg_Ioc : has_neg.neg '' (Ioc a b) = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
lemma image_neg_Ioo : has_neg.neg '' (Ioo a b) = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Ici : (λ x, a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Iic : (λ x, a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Ioi : (λ x, a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Iio : (λ x, a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Icc : (λ x, a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Ico : (λ x, a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Ioc : (λ x, a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
@[simp] lemma image_const_sub_Ioo : (λ x, a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, image_comp (λ x, a + x) (λ x, -x)]
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Ici : (λ x, x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Iic : (λ x, x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Ioi : (λ x, x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Iio : (λ x, x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Icc : (λ x, x - a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Ico : (λ x, x - a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Ioc : (λ x, x - a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp] lemma image_sub_const_Ioo : (λ x, x - a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) :=
by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
/-!
### Bijections
-/
lemma Iic_add_bij : bij_on (+a) (Iic b) (Iic (b + a)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x h, add_le_add_right (mem_Iic.mp h) _, λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h, λ _ h, _⟩,
simpa [add_comm a] using h,
end
lemma Iio_add_bij : bij_on (+a) (Iio b) (Iio (b + a)) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x h, add_lt_add_right (mem_Iio.mp h) _, λ _ _ _ _ h, add_right_cancel h, λ _ h, _⟩,
simpa [add_comm a] using h,
end
end ordered_add_comm_group
/-!
### Multiplication and inverse in a field
-/
section linear_ordered_field
variables {k : Type u} [linear_ordered_field k]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Iio (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Iio a) = Iio (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (lt_div_iff h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ioi (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ioi a) = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (div_lt_iff h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Iic (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Iic a) = Iic (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (le_div_iff h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ici (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ici a) = Ici (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (div_le_iff h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ioo (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ioo a b) = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ioc (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ioc a b) = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ico (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ico a b) = Ico (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Icc (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Icc a b) = Icc (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Iio a) = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (div_lt_iff_of_neg h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ioi a) = Iio (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (lt_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Iic a) = Ici (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (div_le_iff_of_neg h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ici a) = Iic (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (le_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ioo a b) = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ioc a b) = Ico (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Ico a b) = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
(λ x, x * c) ⁻¹' (Icc a b) = Icc (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Iio (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Iio a) = Iio (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (lt_div_iff' h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ioi (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ioi a) = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (div_lt_iff' h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Iic (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Iic a) = Iic (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (le_div_iff' h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ici (a : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ici a) = Ici (a / c) :=
ext $ λ x, (div_le_iff' h).symm
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ioo (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ioo a b) = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ioc (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ioc a b) = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ico (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ico a b) = Ico (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Icc (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Icc a b) = Icc (a / c) (b / c) :=
by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Iio a) = Ioi (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg a h
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ioi a) = Iio (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg a h
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Iic a) = Ici (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg a h
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg (a : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ici a) = Iic (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg a h
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ioo a b) = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg a b h
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ioc a b) = Ico (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg a b h
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Ico a b) = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg a b h
@[simp] lemma preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg (a b : k) {c : k} (h : c < 0) :
((*) c) ⁻¹' (Icc a b) = Icc (b / c) (a / c) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg a b h
lemma image_mul_right_Icc' (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
((units.mk0 c h.ne').mul_right.image_eq_preimage _).trans (by simp [h, division_def])
lemma image_mul_right_Icc {a b c : k} (hab : a ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
(λ x, x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
begin
cases eq_or_lt_of_le hc,
{ subst c,
simp [(nonempty_Icc.2 hab).image_const] },
exact image_mul_right_Icc' a b ‹0 < c›
end
lemma image_mul_left_Icc' {a : k} (h : 0 < a) (b c : k) :
((*) a) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) :=
by { convert image_mul_right_Icc' b c h using 1; simp only [mul_comm _ a] }
lemma image_mul_left_Icc {a b c : k} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
((*) a) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) :=
by { convert image_mul_right_Icc hbc ha using 1; simp only [mul_comm _ a] }
lemma image_mul_right_Ioo (a b : k) {c : k} (h : 0 < c) :
(λ x, x * c) '' Ioo a b = Ioo (a * c) (b * c) :=
((units.mk0 c h.ne').mul_right.image_eq_preimage _).trans (by simp [h, division_def])
lemma image_mul_left_Ioo {a : k} (h : 0 < a) (b c : k) :
((*) a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a * b) (a * c) :=
by { convert image_mul_right_Ioo b c h using 1; simp only [mul_comm _ a] }
/-- The image under `inv` of `Ioo 0 a` is `Ioi a⁻¹`. -/
lemma image_inv_Ioo_0_left {a : k} (ha : 0 < a) : has_inv.inv '' Ioo 0 a = Ioi a⁻¹ :=
begin
ext x,
exact ⟨λ ⟨y, ⟨hy0, hya⟩, hyx⟩, hyx ▸ (inv_lt_inv ha hy0).2 hya, λ h, ⟨x⁻¹, ⟨inv_pos.2 (lt_trans
(inv_pos.2 ha) h), (inv_lt ha (lt_trans (inv_pos.2 ha) h)).1 h⟩, inv_inv' x⟩⟩,
end
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a * x + b`
-/
@[simp] lemma image_affine_Icc' {a : k} (h : 0 < a) (b c d : k) :
(λ x, a * x + b) '' Icc c d = Icc (a * c + b) (a * d + b) :=
begin
suffices : (λ x, x + b) '' ((λ x, a * x) '' Icc c d) = Icc (a * c + b) (a * d + b),
{ rwa set.image_image at this, },
rw [image_mul_left_Icc' h, image_add_const_Icc],
end
end linear_ordered_field
end set
|
38fc8349ca5da6e5975009b6f4c61a9a03b58dae | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/nat/factorial/basic.lean | d9fe35f593f0477eae0dfb20d04739996404adda | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,766 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes, Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import data.nat.basic
import data.nat.pow
/-!
# Factorial and variants
This file defines the factorial, along with the ascending and descending variants.
## Main declarations
* `nat.factorial`: The factorial.
* `nat.asc_factorial`: The ascending factorial. Note that it runs from `n + 1` to `n + k`
and *not* from `n` to `n + k - 1`. We might want to change that in the future.
* `nat.desc_factorial`: The descending factorial. It runs from `n - k` to `n`.
-/
namespace nat
/-- `nat.factorial n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
@[simp] def factorial : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 1
| (succ n) := succ n * factorial n
localized "notation (name := nat.factorial) n `!`:10000 := nat.factorial n" in nat
section factorial
variables {m n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem factorial_zero : 0! = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_succ (n : ℕ) : n.succ! = (n + 1) * n! := rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_one : 1! = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_two : 2! = 2 := rfl
theorem mul_factorial_pred (hn : 0 < n) : n * (n - 1)! = n! :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (nat.succ_le_of_lt hn) ▸ rfl
theorem factorial_pos : ∀ n, 0 < n!
| 0 := zero_lt_one
| (succ n) := mul_pos (succ_pos _) (factorial_pos n)
theorem factorial_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : n! ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (factorial_pos _)
theorem factorial_dvd_factorial {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m! ∣ n! :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ simp [nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h] },
obtain rfl | hl := h.eq_or_lt,
{ simp },
exact (IH (le_of_lt_succ hl)).mul_left _,
end
theorem dvd_factorial : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ n!
| (succ m) n _ h := dvd_of_mul_right_dvd (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
@[mono] theorem factorial_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m! ≤ n! :=
le_of_dvd (factorial_pos _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
lemma factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m! * m.succ ^ n ≤ (m + n)!
| m 0 := by simp
| m (n+1) :=
by rw [← add_assoc, nat.factorial_succ, mul_comm (nat.succ _), pow_succ', ← mul_assoc];
exact mul_le_mul factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
(nat.succ_le_succ (nat.le_add_right _ _)) (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma monotone_factorial : monotone factorial := λ n m, factorial_le
lemma factorial_lt (hn : 0 < n) : n! < m! ↔ n < m :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, not_le.mp $ λ hmn, not_le_of_lt h (factorial_le hmn), λ h, _⟩,
have : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → n! < n.succ!,
{ intros k hk,
rw [factorial_succ, succ_mul, lt_add_iff_pos_left],
exact mul_pos hk k.factorial_pos },
induction h with k hnk ih generalizing hn,
{ exact this hn, },
{ exact (ih hn).trans (this $ hn.trans $ lt_of_succ_le hnk) }
end
lemma one_lt_factorial : 1 < n! ↔ 1 < n :=
factorial_lt one_pos
lemma factorial_eq_one : n! = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, by rintro (_ | _ | _); refl⟩,
rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_factorial, h],
apply lt_irrefl
end
lemma factorial_inj (hn : 1 < n!) : n! = m! ↔ n = m :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, congr_arg _⟩,
obtain hnm | rfl | hnm := lt_trichotomy n m,
{ rw [← factorial_lt $ pos_of_gt $ one_lt_factorial.mp hn, h] at hnm,
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm },
{ refl },
rw [h, one_lt_factorial] at hn,
rw [←factorial_lt (lt_trans one_pos hn), h] at hnm,
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
end
lemma self_le_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, n ≤ n!
| 0 := zero_le_one
| (k + 1) := le_mul_of_one_le_right k.zero_lt_succ.le (nat.one_le_of_lt $ nat.factorial_pos _)
lemma lt_factorial_self {n : ℕ} (hi : 3 ≤ n) : n < n! :=
begin
rw [← succ_pred_eq_of_pos ((zero_lt_two.trans (lt.base 2)).trans_le hi), factorial_succ],
exact lt_mul_of_one_lt_right ((pred n).succ_pos) ((one_lt_two.trans_le
(le_pred_of_lt (succ_le_iff.mp hi))).trans_le (self_le_factorial _)),
end
lemma add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ {i : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) :
i + (n + 1)! < (i + n + 1)! :=
begin
rw [factorial_succ (i + _), add_mul, one_mul],
have : i ≤ i + n := le.intro rfl,
exact add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (this.trans_lt ((lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right (zero_lt_two.trans_le
(hi.trans this))).mpr (lt_iff_le_and_ne.mpr ⟨(i + n).factorial_pos, λ g,
nat.not_succ_le_self 1 ((hi.trans this).trans (factorial_eq_one.mp g.symm))⟩))) (factorial_le
((le_of_eq (add_comm n 1)).trans ((add_le_add_iff_right n).mpr (one_le_two.trans hi)))),
end
lemma add_factorial_lt_factorial_add {i n : ℕ} (hi : 2 ≤ i) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
i + n! < (i + n)! :=
begin
cases hn,
{ rw factorial_one,
exact lt_factorial_self (succ_le_succ hi) },
exact add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ _ hi,
end
lemma add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ (i : ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
i + (n + 1)! ≤ (i + (n + 1))! :=
begin
obtain i2 | _ | i0 := le_or_lt 2 i,
{ exact (n.add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ i2).le },
{ rw [←add_assoc, factorial_succ (1 + n), add_mul, one_mul, add_comm 1 n],
exact (add_le_add_iff_right _).mpr (one_le_mul (nat.le_add_left 1 n) (n + 1).factorial_pos) },
rw [le_zero_iff.mp (nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp i0), zero_add, zero_add]
end
lemma add_factorial_le_factorial_add (i : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) :
i + n! ≤ (i + n)! :=
begin
cases n1 with h,
{ exact self_le_factorial _ },
exact add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ i h,
end
lemma factorial_mul_pow_sub_le_factorial {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) : n! * n ^ (m - n) ≤ m! :=
begin
suffices : n! * (n + 1) ^ (m - n) ≤ m!,
{ apply trans _ this,
rw mul_le_mul_left,
apply pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zero_le n) (le_succ n),
exact factorial_pos n },
convert nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial,
exact (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hnm).symm,
end
end factorial
/-! ### Ascending and descending factorials -/
section asc_factorial
/-- `n.asc_factorial k = (n + k)! / n!` (as seen in `nat.asc_factorial_eq_div`), but implemented
recursively to allow for "quick" computation when using `norm_num`. This is closely related to
`pochhammer`, but much less general. -/
def asc_factorial (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 1
| (k + 1) := (n + k + 1) * asc_factorial k
@[simp] lemma asc_factorial_zero (n : ℕ) : n.asc_factorial 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_asc_factorial (k : ℕ) : (0 : ℕ).asc_factorial k = k! :=
begin
induction k with t ht,
{ refl },
rw [asc_factorial, ht, zero_add, nat.factorial_succ],
end
lemma asc_factorial_succ {n k : ℕ} : n.asc_factorial k.succ = (n + k + 1) * n.asc_factorial k := rfl
lemma succ_asc_factorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, (n + 1) * n.succ.asc_factorial k = (n + k + 1) * n.asc_factorial k
| 0 := by rw [add_zero, asc_factorial_zero, asc_factorial_zero]
| (k + 1) := by rw [asc_factorial, mul_left_comm, succ_asc_factorial, asc_factorial, succ_add,
←add_assoc]
/-- `n.asc_factorial k = (n + k)! / n!` but without ℕ-division. See `nat.asc_factorial_eq_div` for
the version with ℕ-division. -/
theorem factorial_mul_asc_factorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ k, n! * n.asc_factorial k = (n + k)!
| 0 := by rw [asc_factorial, add_zero, mul_one]
| (k + 1) := by rw [asc_factorial_succ, mul_left_comm, factorial_mul_asc_factorial, ← add_assoc,
factorial]
/-- Avoid in favor of `nat.factorial_mul_asc_factorial` if you can. ℕ-division isn't worth it. -/
lemma asc_factorial_eq_div (n k : ℕ) : n.asc_factorial k = (n + k)! / n! :=
begin
apply mul_left_cancel₀ n.factorial_ne_zero,
rw factorial_mul_asc_factorial,
exact (nat.mul_div_cancel' $ factorial_dvd_factorial $ le.intro rfl).symm
end
lemma asc_factorial_of_sub {n k : ℕ} (h : k < n) :
(n - k) * (n - k).asc_factorial k = (n - (k + 1)).asc_factorial (k + 1) :=
begin
set t := n - k.succ with ht,
suffices h' : n - k = t.succ, by rw [←ht, h', succ_asc_factorial, asc_factorial_succ],
rw [ht, succ_eq_add_one, ←tsub_tsub_assoc (succ_le_of_lt h) (succ_pos _), succ_sub_one],
end
lemma pow_succ_le_asc_factorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ (k : ℕ), (n + 1)^k ≤ n.asc_factorial k
| 0 := by rw [asc_factorial_zero, pow_zero]
| (k + 1) := begin
rw pow_succ,
exact nat.mul_le_mul (nat.add_le_add_right le_self_add _) (pow_succ_le_asc_factorial k),
end
lemma pow_lt_asc_factorial' (n k : ℕ) : (n + 1)^(k + 2) < n.asc_factorial (k + 2) :=
begin
rw pow_succ,
exact nat.mul_lt_mul (nat.add_lt_add_right (nat.lt_add_of_pos_right succ_pos') 1)
(pow_succ_le_asc_factorial n _) (pow_pos succ_pos' _),
end
lemma pow_lt_asc_factorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → (n + 1)^k < n.asc_factorial k
| 0 := by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 := by rintro (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
| (k + 2) := λ _, pow_lt_asc_factorial' n k
lemma asc_factorial_le_pow_add (n : ℕ) : ∀ (k : ℕ), n.asc_factorial k ≤ (n + k)^k
| 0 := by rw [asc_factorial_zero, pow_zero]
| (k + 1) := begin
rw [asc_factorial_succ, pow_succ],
exact nat.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((asc_factorial_le_pow_add k).trans (nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left
(le_succ _) _)),
end
lemma asc_factorial_lt_pow_add (n : ℕ) : ∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → n.asc_factorial k < (n + k)^k
| 0 := by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 := by rintro (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
| (k + 2) := λ _, begin
rw [asc_factorial_succ, pow_succ],
refine nat.mul_lt_mul' le_rfl ((asc_factorial_le_pow_add n _).trans_lt
(pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left (lt_add_one _) (succ_pos _))) (succ_pos _),
end
lemma asc_factorial_pos (n k : ℕ) : 0 < n.asc_factorial k :=
(pow_pos (succ_pos n) k).trans_le (pow_succ_le_asc_factorial n k)
end asc_factorial
section desc_factorial
/-- `n.desc_factorial k = n! / (n - k)!` (as seen in `nat.desc_factorial_eq_div`), but
implemented recursively to allow for "quick" computation when using `norm_num`. This is closely
related to `pochhammer`, but much less general. -/
def desc_factorial (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 1
| (k + 1) := (n - k) * desc_factorial k
@[simp] lemma desc_factorial_zero (n : ℕ) : n.desc_factorial 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma desc_factorial_succ (n k : ℕ) :
n.desc_factorial k.succ = (n - k) * n.desc_factorial k := rfl
lemma zero_desc_factorial_succ (k : ℕ) :
(0 : ℕ).desc_factorial k.succ = 0 :=
by rw [desc_factorial_succ, zero_tsub, zero_mul]
@[simp] lemma desc_factorial_one (n : ℕ) :
n.desc_factorial 1 = n :=
by rw [desc_factorial_succ, desc_factorial_zero, mul_one, tsub_zero]
@[simp] lemma succ_desc_factorial_succ (n : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, (n + 1).desc_factorial (k + 1) = (n + 1) * n.desc_factorial k
| 0 := by rw [desc_factorial_zero, desc_factorial_one, mul_one]
| (succ k) := by rw [desc_factorial_succ, succ_desc_factorial_succ, desc_factorial_succ,
succ_sub_succ, mul_left_comm]
lemma succ_desc_factorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, (n + 1 - k) * (n + 1).desc_factorial k = (n + 1) * n.desc_factorial k
| 0 := by rw [tsub_zero, desc_factorial_zero, desc_factorial_zero]
| (k + 1) := by rw [desc_factorial, succ_desc_factorial, desc_factorial_succ, succ_sub_succ,
mul_left_comm]
lemma desc_factorial_self : ∀ n : ℕ, n.desc_factorial n = n!
| 0 := by rw [desc_factorial_zero, factorial_zero]
| (succ n) := by rw [succ_desc_factorial_succ, desc_factorial_self, factorial_succ]
@[simp] lemma desc_factorial_eq_zero_iff_lt {n : ℕ} : ∀ {k : ℕ}, n.desc_factorial k = 0 ↔ n < k
| 0 := by simp only [desc_factorial_zero, nat.one_ne_zero, nat.not_lt_zero]
| (succ k) := begin
rw [desc_factorial_succ, mul_eq_zero, desc_factorial_eq_zero_iff_lt, lt_succ_iff,
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, lt_iff_le_and_ne, or_iff_left_iff_imp, and_imp],
exact λ h _, h,
end
alias desc_factorial_eq_zero_iff_lt ↔ _ desc_factorial_of_lt
lemma add_desc_factorial_eq_asc_factorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, (n + k).desc_factorial k = n.asc_factorial k
| 0 := by rw [asc_factorial_zero, desc_factorial_zero]
| (succ k) := by rw [nat.add_succ, succ_desc_factorial_succ, asc_factorial_succ,
add_desc_factorial_eq_asc_factorial]
/-- `n.desc_factorial k = n! / (n - k)!` but without ℕ-division. See `nat.desc_factorial_eq_div`
for the version using ℕ-division. -/
theorem factorial_mul_desc_factorial : ∀ {n k : ℕ}, k ≤ n → (n - k)! * n.desc_factorial k = n!
| n 0 := λ _, by rw [desc_factorial_zero, mul_one, tsub_zero]
| 0 (succ k) := λ h, by { exfalso, exact not_succ_le_zero k h }
| (succ n) (succ k) := λ h, by rw [succ_desc_factorial_succ, succ_sub_succ, ←mul_assoc,
mul_comm (n - k)!, mul_assoc, factorial_mul_desc_factorial (nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 h),
factorial_succ]
/-- Avoid in favor of `nat.factorial_mul_desc_factorial` if you can. ℕ-division isn't worth it. -/
lemma desc_factorial_eq_div {n k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ n) : n.desc_factorial k = n! / (n - k)! :=
begin
apply mul_left_cancel₀ (factorial_ne_zero (n - k)),
rw factorial_mul_desc_factorial h,
exact (nat.mul_div_cancel' $ factorial_dvd_factorial $ nat.sub_le n k).symm,
end
lemma pow_sub_le_desc_factorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ (k : ℕ), (n + 1 - k)^k ≤ n.desc_factorial k
| 0 := by rw [desc_factorial_zero, pow_zero]
| (k + 1) := begin
rw [desc_factorial_succ, pow_succ, succ_sub_succ],
exact nat.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_trans (nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left
(tsub_le_tsub_right (le_succ _) _) k) (pow_sub_le_desc_factorial k)),
end
lemma pow_sub_lt_desc_factorial' {n : ℕ} :
∀ {k : ℕ}, k + 2 ≤ n → (n - (k + 1))^(k + 2) < n.desc_factorial (k + 2)
| 0 := λ h, begin
rw [desc_factorial_succ, pow_succ, pow_one, desc_factorial_one],
exact nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (tsub_lt_self (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_two h) zero_lt_one)
(tsub_pos_of_lt h),
end
| (k + 1) := λ h, begin
rw [desc_factorial_succ, pow_succ],
refine nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ((nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (tsub_le_tsub_right
(le_succ n) _) _).trans_lt _) (tsub_pos_of_lt h),
rw succ_sub_succ,
exact (pow_sub_lt_desc_factorial' ((le_succ _).trans h)),
end
lemma pow_sub_lt_desc_factorial {n : ℕ} :
∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → k ≤ n → (n + 1 - k)^k < n.desc_factorial k
| 0 := by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 := by rintro (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
| (k + 2) := λ _ h, by { rw succ_sub_succ, exact pow_sub_lt_desc_factorial' h }
lemma desc_factorial_le_pow (n : ℕ) : ∀ (k : ℕ), n.desc_factorial k ≤ n^k
| 0 := by rw [desc_factorial_zero, pow_zero]
| (k + 1) := begin
rw [desc_factorial_succ, pow_succ],
exact nat.mul_le_mul (nat.sub_le _ _) (desc_factorial_le_pow k),
end
lemma desc_factorial_lt_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : 1 ≤ n) : ∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → n.desc_factorial k < n^k
| 0 := by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 := by rintro (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
| (k + 2) := λ _, begin
rw [desc_factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm],
exact nat.mul_lt_mul' (desc_factorial_le_pow _ _) (tsub_lt_self hn k.zero_lt_succ)
(pow_pos hn _),
end
end desc_factorial
end nat
|
76afff6ebf62725b1fa68825963cf5bf52b61d51 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/complex/circle.lean | 66aebc42a9920a4a8324b405785cac0e2dc377d1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,407 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import analysis.special_functions.exp
import topology.continuous_function.basic
import analysis.normed.field.unit_ball
/-!
# The circle
This file defines `circle` to be the metric sphere (`metric.sphere`) in `ℂ` centred at `0` of
radius `1`. We equip it with the following structure:
* a submonoid of `ℂ`
* a group
* a topological group
We furthermore define `exp_map_circle` to be the natural map `λ t, exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to
`circle`, and show that this map is a group homomorphism.
## Implementation notes
Because later (in `geometry.manifold.instances.sphere`) one wants to equip the circle with a smooth
manifold structure borrowed from `metric.sphere`, the underlying set is
`{z : ℂ | abs (z - 0) = 1}`. This prevents certain algebraic facts from working definitionally --
for example, the circle is not defeq to `{z : ℂ | abs z = 1}`, which is the kernel of `complex.abs`
considered as a homomorphism from `ℂ` to `ℝ`, nor is it defeq to `{z : ℂ | norm_sq z = 1}`, which
is the kernel of the homomorphism `complex.norm_sq` from `ℂ` to `ℝ`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open complex metric
open_locale complex_conjugate
/-- The unit circle in `ℂ`, here given the structure of a submonoid of `ℂ`. -/
def circle : submonoid ℂ := submonoid.unit_sphere ℂ
@[simp] lemma mem_circle_iff_abs {z : ℂ} : z ∈ circle ↔ abs z = 1 := mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm
lemma circle_def : ↑circle = {z : ℂ | abs z = 1} := set.ext $ λ z, mem_circle_iff_abs
@[simp] lemma abs_coe_circle (z : circle) : abs z = 1 :=
mem_circle_iff_abs.mp z.2
lemma mem_circle_iff_norm_sq {z : ℂ} : z ∈ circle ↔ norm_sq z = 1 :=
by simp [complex.abs]
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_eq_of_mem_circle (z : circle) : norm_sq z = 1 := by simp [norm_sq_eq_abs]
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_circle (z : circle) : (z:ℂ) ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere z
instance : comm_group circle := metric.sphere.comm_group
@[simp] lemma coe_inv_circle (z : circle) : ↑(z⁻¹) = (z : ℂ)⁻¹ := rfl
lemma coe_inv_circle_eq_conj (z : circle) : ↑(z⁻¹) = conj (z : ℂ) :=
by rw [coe_inv_circle, inv_def, norm_sq_eq_of_mem_circle, inv_one, of_real_one, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma coe_div_circle (z w : circle) : ↑(z / w) = (z:ℂ) / w :=
circle.subtype.map_div z w
/-- The elements of the circle embed into the units. -/
def circle.to_units : circle →* units ℂ := unit_sphere_to_units ℂ
-- written manually because `@[simps]` was slow and generated the wrong lemma
@[simp] lemma circle.to_units_apply (z : circle) :
circle.to_units z = units.mk0 z (ne_zero_of_mem_circle z) := rfl
instance : compact_space circle := metric.sphere.compact_space _ _
instance : topological_group circle := metric.sphere.topological_group
/-- If `z` is a nonzero complex number, then `conj z / z` belongs to the unit circle. -/
@[simps] def circle.of_conj_div_self (z : ℂ) (hz : z ≠ 0) : circle :=
⟨conj z / z, mem_circle_iff_abs.2 $ by rw [map_div₀, abs_conj, div_self (complex.abs.ne_zero hz)]⟩
/-- The map `λ t, exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to the unit circle in `ℂ`. -/
def exp_map_circle : C(ℝ, circle) :=
{ to_fun := λ t, ⟨exp (t * I), by simp [exp_mul_I, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I]⟩ }
@[simp] lemma exp_map_circle_apply (t : ℝ) : ↑(exp_map_circle t) = complex.exp (t * complex.I) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma exp_map_circle_zero : exp_map_circle 0 = 1 :=
subtype.ext $ by rw [exp_map_circle_apply, of_real_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, submonoid.coe_one]
@[simp] lemma exp_map_circle_add (x y : ℝ) :
exp_map_circle (x + y) = exp_map_circle x * exp_map_circle y :=
subtype.ext $ by simp only [exp_map_circle_apply, submonoid.coe_mul, of_real_add, add_mul,
complex.exp_add]
/-- The map `λ t, exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to the unit circle in `ℂ`, considered as a homomorphism of
groups. -/
@[simps]
def exp_map_circle_hom : ℝ →+ (additive circle) :=
{ to_fun := additive.of_mul ∘ exp_map_circle,
map_zero' := exp_map_circle_zero,
map_add' := exp_map_circle_add }
@[simp] lemma exp_map_circle_sub (x y : ℝ) :
exp_map_circle (x - y) = exp_map_circle x / exp_map_circle y :=
exp_map_circle_hom.map_sub x y
@[simp] lemma exp_map_circle_neg (x : ℝ) : exp_map_circle (-x) = (exp_map_circle x)⁻¹ :=
exp_map_circle_hom.map_neg x
|
423376fe19532ee90b643080024fb346391b8920 | bf532e3e865883a676110e756f800e0ddeb465be | /data/list/basic.lean | 4a6c3acc115ae69e813c294c6a70dbaa09e7e4d0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | aqjune/mathlib | da42a97d9e6670d2efaa7d2aa53ed3585dafc289 | f7977ff5a6bcf7e5c54eec908364ceb40dafc795 | refs/heads/master | 1,631,213,225,595 | 1,521,089,840,000 | 1,521,089,840,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 126,941 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
Basic properties of lists.
-/
import tactic.interactive algebra.group logic.basic logic.function
data.nat.basic data.option data.bool data.prod data.sigma
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
@[simp] theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
theorem cons_inj {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
@[simp] theorem cons_inj' (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
⟨λ e, cons_inj e, congr_arg _⟩
/- mem -/
theorem eq_nil_of_forall_not_mem : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a, a ∉ l) → l = nil
| [] := assume h, rfl
| (b :: l') := assume h, absurd (mem_cons_self b l') (h b)
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, by intro h; simp [h]⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih; simp at h; cases h with h h,
{ subst h, exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ cases ih h with s e, cases e with t e,
subst l, exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{simp at h, contradiction },
{simp, simp at h, cases h with h h,
{simp *},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{simp at h, contradiction},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{existsi c, simp [h]},
{cases ih h with a ha, cases ha with ha₁ ha₂,
existsi a, simp * }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_map_of_inj {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp [join, @mem_join L, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) : b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
/- list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_app_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_app_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp [subset_def, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem app_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
/- append -/
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_foldl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s t : list β) : foldl f a (s ++ t) = foldl f (foldl f a s) t :=
by {induction s with b s H generalizing a, refl, simp [foldl], rw H _}
theorem append_foldr (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (s t : list α) : foldr f a (s ++ t) = foldr f (foldr f a t) s :=
by {induction s with b s H generalizing a, refl, simp [foldr], rw H _}
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil (p q : list α) : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp
/- join -/
attribute [simp] join
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; simp *
/- repeat take drop -/
/-- Split a list at an index. `split 2 [a, b, c] = ([a, b], [c])` -/
def split_at : ℕ → list α → list α × list α
| 0 a := ([], a)
| (succ n) [] := ([], [])
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := let (l, r) := split_at n xs in (x :: l, r)
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp [take_append_drop n xs]
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj : ∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_left_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n → b = a
| (n+1) h := or.elim h id $ @eq_of_mem_repeat _
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H :=
have b = a ∧ ∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → x = a,
by simpa [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] using H,
by dsimp; congr; [exact this.1, exact eq_repeat_of_mem this.2]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; simp [-add_comm, *]
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) : b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
/- bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
/- concat -/
/-- Concatenate an element at the end of a list. `concat [a, b] c = [a, b, c]` -/
@[simp] def concat : list α → α → list α
| [] a := [a]
| (b::l) a := b :: concat l a
@[simp] theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by induction l; intro h; contradiction
@[simp] theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with b l₁ ih; [simp, simp [ih]]
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp [*, concat]
@[simp] theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp [succ_eq_add_one]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by induction l₂ with b l₂ ih; simp
/- reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ (concat l₂ a) = concat (reverse_core l₁ l₂) a,
by intros l₁; induction l₁; intros; rsimp,
aux l nil
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; simp *
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
injective_of_left_inverse reverse_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; simp *
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; simp *
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; simp [*, or_comm]
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ simp, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/- last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : ∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, simp *, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih; rsimp,
have haux : tl ++ [a] ≠ [],
{apply append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right, contradiction},
simp *
end
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp *
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
/- head and tail -/
@[simp] theorem head_cons [h : inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [h : inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) : head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, simp}
theorem cons_head_tail [h : inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
by {induction l, contradiction, simp}
/- map -/
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h :=
have f a = g a, from h _ (mem_cons_self _ _),
have map f l = map g l, from map_congr $ assume a', h _ ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _,
show f a :: map f l = g a :: map g l, by simp [*]
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; simp *
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
theorem foldl_hom (f : α → β) (g : α → γ → α) (g' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (g a x) = g' (f a) x) (l : list γ) : f (foldl g a l) = foldl g' (f a) l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
theorem foldr_hom (f : α → β) (g : γ → α → α) (g' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (g x a) = g' x (f a)) (l : list γ) : f (foldr g a l) = foldr g' (f a) l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (begin rw [← length_map f l], simp [h] end)
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; simp *
theorem bind_ret_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by simp [list.bind]; induction l; simp [list.ret, join, *]
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
f <$> l = map f l := bind_ret_eq_map _ _
/- map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
/- sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_app_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_app_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h; simp * },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem reverse_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih; simp,
{ exact sublist_app_of_sublist_left ih },
{ exact append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right ih [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by have := reverse_sublist h; simp at this; assumption, reverse_sublist⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by have := reverse_sublist h; simp at this; assumption,
λ h, append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right h l⟩
theorem subset_of_sublist : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (subset_of_sublist s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (subset_of_sublist s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, subset_of_sublist h (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ subset_of_sublist s
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [apply sublist.refl, simp [*, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist_antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/- index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih; simp [-add_comm],
by_cases h : a = b; simp [h, -add_comm],
{ intro, contradiction },
{ rw ← ih, exact ⟨succ_inj, congr_arg _⟩ }
end
@[simp] theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih; simp [-add_comm, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b; simp [h, -add_comm, zero_le],
exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/- nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_ge_len : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, n ≥ length l → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_ge_len (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_ge_len hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa; simp [*, ext (λn, h (n+1))]
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by rw [nth_ge_len h₁, nth_ge_len (by rwa [← hl])]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b; simp *
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i := by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, by simp); exact
λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
/-- Convert a list into an array (whose length is the length of `l`) -/
def to_array (l : list α) : array l.length α :=
{data := λ v, l.nth_le v.1 v.2}
/-- "inhabited" `nth` function: returns `default` instead of `none` in the case
that the index is out of bounds. -/
@[simp] def inth [h : inhabited α] (l : list α) (n : nat) : α := (nth l n).iget
/- nth tail operation -/
/-- Apply a function to the nth tail of `l`.
`modify_nth_tail f 2 [a, b, c] = [a, b] ++ f [c]`. Returns the input without
using `f` if the index is larger than the length of the list. -/
@[simp] def modify_nth_tail (f : list α → list α) : ℕ → list α → list α
| 0 l := f l
| (n+1) [] := []
| (n+1) (a::l) := a :: modify_nth_tail n l
/-- Apply `f` to the head of the list, if it exists. -/
@[simp] def modify_head (f : α → α) : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) := f a :: l
/-- Apply `f` to the nth element of the list, if it exists. -/
def modify_nth (f : α → α) : ℕ → list α → list α :=
modify_nth_tail (modify_head f)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m; simp [h, mt succ_inj]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp [update_nth_eq_modify_nth]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp [nth_modify_nth]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp [nth_modify_nth, h]; cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp [update_nth_eq_modify_nth]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, h]
/- take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero : ∀ (l : list α), take 0 l = [] :=
begin intros, reflexivity end
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
theorem take_all : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_all end
theorem take_all_of_ge : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, n ≥ length l → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_ge (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_take]
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp [update_nth]
/- take_while -/
/-- Get the longest initial segment of the list whose members all satisfy `p`.
`take_while (λ x, x < 3) [0, 2, 5, 1] = [0, 2]` -/
def take_while (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) := if p a then a :: take_while l else []
/- foldl, foldr, scanl, scanr -/
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp [foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp [foldr_append]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp [foldl_join]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp [foldr_join]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; simp [*, foldr]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) : foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp [foldr_eta l]
/-- Fold a function `f` over the list from the left, returning the list
of partial results. `scanl (+) 0 [1, 2, 3] = [0, 1, 3, 6]` -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) : α → list β → list α
| a [] := [a]
| a (b::l) := a :: scanl (f a b) l
def scanr_aux (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : list α → β × list β
| [] := (b, [])
| (a::l) := let (b', l') := scanr_aux l in (f a b', b' :: l')
/-- Fold a function `f` over the list from the right, returning the list
of partial results. `scanr (+) 0 [1, 2, 3] = [6, 5, 3, 0]` -/
def scanr (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (l : list α) : list β :=
let (b', l') := scanr_aux f b l in b' :: l'
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp [scanr, scanr_aux] at t; simp [scanr, scanr_aux, t]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp [scanr]
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by simp [foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp;
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; simp
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp [foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := by simp
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp [ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc]; simp
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := by simp
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp [foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/- sum -/
/-- Product of a list. `prod [a, b, c] = ((1 * a) * b) * c` -/
@[to_additive list.sum]
def prod [has_mul α] [has_one α] : list α → α := foldl (*) 1
attribute [to_additive list.sum.equations._eqn_1] list.prod.equations._eqn_1
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_nil]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_cons]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp [list.prod]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_append]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_join]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; simp [list.join, *] at *
end monoid
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; simp [*, nat.mul_succ]
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; simp *
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) : length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
/- all & any, bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_cons' {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ (x : α), x = a ∨ x ∈ l → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x :=
by simp
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (by simp) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (by simp [xl]) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, simp [px] end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
@[simp] theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by induction l with a l; simp [forall_and_distrib, *]
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [all_iff_forall]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by induction l with a l; simp [or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, *]
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/- map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; simp *; apply ih
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨a, m, rfl⟩, cases a, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp [pmap_eq_map_attach]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; simp *
/- find -/
section find
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
/-- `find p l` is the first element of `l` satisfying `p`, or `none` if no such
element exists. -/
def find : list α → option α
| [] := none
| (a::l) := if p a then some a else find l
def find_indexes_aux (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → nat → list nat
| [] n := []
| (a::l) n := let t := find_indexes_aux l (succ n) in if p a then n :: t else t
/-- `find_indexes p l` is the list of indexes of elements of `l` that satisfy `p`. -/
def find_indexes (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) : list nat :=
find_indexes_aux p l 0
@[simp] theorem find_nil : find p [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos {p : α → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {a : α}
(l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg {p : α → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {a : α}
(l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none {p : α → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {l : list α} :
find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
by_cases p a; simp [h, IH]
end
@[simp] theorem find_some {p : α → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
(H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases p b; simp [h] at H,
{ subst b, assumption },
{ exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem {p : α → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
(H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases p b; simp [h] at H,
{ subst b, apply mem_cons_self },
{ exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-- `indexes_of a l` is the list of all indexes of `a` in `l`.
`indexes_of a [a, b, a, a] = [0, 2, 3]` -/
def indexes_of [decidable_eq α] (a : α) : list α → list nat := find_indexes (eq a)
/- filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp [filter_map, h]
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
simp [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH]
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
by_cases pa : p a; simp [filter_map, option.guard, pa, IH]
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp [h, option.bind] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp [h, h', option.bind]
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases p x; simp [h, option.guard, option.bind]
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp [map_filter_map, H]
theorem filter_map_sublist_filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem map_sublist_map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_map; exact filter_map_sublist_filter_map _ s
/- filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist $ filter_sublist l
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| [] ain := absurd ain (not_mem_nil a)
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, begin simp [pb] at ain, assumption end,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp [pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| [] ain pa := absurd ain (not_mem_nil a)
| (b::l) ain pa :=
if pb : p b then
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain)
(assume : a = b, by simp [pb, this])
(assume : a ∈ l, begin simp [pb], exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_filter_of_mem this pa)) end)
else
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain)
(assume : a = b, begin simp [this] at pa, contradiction end) --absurd (this ▸ pa) pb)
(assume : a ∈ l, by simp [pa, pb, mem_filter_of_mem this])
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l, {simp},
by_cases p a; simp [filter, *],
show filter p l ≠ a :: l, intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _)
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp [-and.comm, eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter]
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_filter; exact filter_map_sublist_filter_map _ s
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : ∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [span, take_while, drop_while, pa, span_eq_take_drop l]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : ∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [take_while, drop_while, pa, take_while_append_drop l]
/-- `countp p l` is the number of elements of `l` that satisfy `p`. -/
def countp (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → nat
| [] := 0
| (x::xs) := if p x then succ (countp xs) else countp xs
@[simp] theorem countp_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l; [refl, by_cases (p x)]; simp [*, -add_comm]
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter s)
end filter
/- count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `count a l` is the number of occurrences of `a` in `l`. -/
def count (a : α) : list α → nat := countp (eq a)
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
decidable.by_cases
(assume : a = b, begin rw [count_cons, if_pos this, if_pos this] end)
(assume : a ≠ b, begin rw [count_cons, if_neg this, if_neg this], reflexivity end)
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append
@[simp] theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, count_append, count_singleton]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp [count, countp_pos]
@[simp] theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
end count
/- prefix, suffix, infix -/
/-- `is_prefix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <+: l₂`, means that `l₁` is a prefix of `l₂`,
that is, `l₂` has the form `l₁ ++ t` for some `t`. -/
def is_prefix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ t, l₁ ++ t = l₂
/-- `is_suffix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <:+ l₂`, means that `l₁` is a suffix of `l₂`,
that is, `l₂` has the form `t ++ l₁` for some `t`. -/
def is_suffix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ t, t ++ l₁ = l₂
/-- `is_infix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <:+: l₂`, means that `l₁` is a contiguous
substring of `l₂`, that is, `l₂` has the form `s ++ l₁ ++ t` for some `s, t`. -/
def is_infix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ s t, s ++ l₁ ++ t = l₂
infix ` <+: `:50 := is_prefix
infix ` <:+ `:50 := is_suffix
infix ` <:+: `:50 := is_infix
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
@[simp] theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp [h]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, by simp⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, by simp⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
/-- `inits l` is the list of initial segments of `l`.
`inits [1, 2, 3] = [[], [1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3]]` -/
@[simp] def inits : list α → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (a::l) := [] :: map (λt, a::t) (inits l)
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa,
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
/-- `tails l` is the list of terminal segments of `l`.
`tails [1, 2, 3] = [[1, 2, 3], [2, 3], [3], []]` -/
@[simp] def tails : list α → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (a::l) := (a::l) :: tails l
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp; exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp [mem_tails s t]; exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
/- sublists -/
def sublists'_aux : list α → (list α → list β) → list (list β) → list (list β)
| [] f r := f [] :: r
| (a::l) f r := sublists'_aux l f (sublists'_aux l (f ∘ cons a) r)
/-- `sublists' l` is the list of all (non-contiguous) sublists of `l`.
It differs from `sublists` only in the order of appearance of the sublists;
`sublists'` uses the first element of the list as the MSB,
`sublists` uses the first element of the list as the LSB.
`sublists' [1, 2, 3] = [[], [3], [2], [2, 3], [1], [1, 3], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3]]` -/
def sublists' (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists'_aux l id []
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; simp! *
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; simp! *
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists']
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s; simp,
{ exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ (IH.1 h) },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ (IH.1 h) },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl (IH.2 h) },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, IH.2 h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, *]; rw [← two_mul, mul_comm]; refl
def sublists_aux : list α → (list α → list β → list β) → list β
| [] f := []
| (a::l) f := f [a] (sublists_aux l (λys r, f ys (f (a :: ys) r)))
/-- `sublists l` is the list of all (non-contiguous) sublists of `l`.
`sublists [1, 2, 3] = [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [3], [1, 3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3]]` -/
def sublists (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
[] :: sublists_aux l cons
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
def sublists_aux₁ : list α → (list α → list β) → list β
| [] f := []
| (a::l) f := f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λys, f ys ++ f (a :: ys))
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp *
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp [sublists_aux], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr_n 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih; simp *
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp [sublists_aux₁]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp [sublists_aux₁];
rw [sublists_aux₁_append]; simp
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := by simp [sublists_aux₁]
| (a::l) f g := by simp [sublists_aux₁];
rw [sublists_aux₁_bind]; simp
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁],
rw [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, simp,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], simp [list.ret]
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp [sublists_aux_cons_append, sublists, map_id']
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by simp [sublists_append];
rw [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁];
simp [map_id', sublists_aux₁]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l; simp [(∘), *]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp [sublists_eq_sublists', map_id']
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro; simp [not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_inj reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp [sublists_eq_sublists', length_sublists']
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2
(singleton_sublist.2 $ mem_map.2 ⟨[], by simp [list.ret]⟩)).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_prefix l₁ l₂) $ by rw [← h]; exact
⟨λ⟨t, te⟩, ⟨t, by rw [← te]; refl⟩,
λ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te (λ_ te, ⟨t, te⟩)⟩
else
is_false $ λ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te $ λh', absurd h' h
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨t, te⟩, absurd te $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
if he : drop (len2 - len1) l₂ = l₁ then is_true $
⟨take (len2 - len1) l₂, by rw [← he, take_append_drop]⟩
else is_false $
suffices length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <:+ l₂ → drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ = l₁,
from λsuf, he (this hl suf),
λ hl ⟨t, te⟩, append_inj_right'
((take_append_drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂).trans te.symm)
(by simp; exact nat.sub_sub_self hl)
else is_false $ λ⟨t, te⟩, hl $
show length l₁ ≤ length l₂, by rw [← te, length_append]; apply nat.le_add_left
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/- transpose -/
def transpose_aux : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] ls := ls
| (a::i) [] := [a] :: transpose_aux i []
| (a::i) (l::ls) := (a::l) :: transpose_aux i ls
/-- transpose of a list of lists, treated as a matrix.
`transpose [[1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6]] = [[1, 3, 5], [2, 4, 6]]` -/
def transpose : list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] := []
| (l::ls) := transpose_aux l (transpose ls)
/- permutations -/
section permutations
def permutations_aux2 (t : α) (ts : list α) (r : list β) : list α → (list α → β) → list α × list β
| [] f := (ts, r)
| (y::ys) f := let (us, zs) := permutations_aux2 ys (λx : list α, f (y::x)) in
(y :: us, f (t :: y :: us) :: zs)
private def meas : (Σ'_:list α, list α) → ℕ × ℕ | ⟨l, i⟩ := (length l + length i, length l)
local infix ` ≺ `:50 := inv_image (prod.lex (<) (<)) meas
@[elab_as_eliminator] def permutations_aux.rec {C : list α → list α → Sort v}
(H0 : ∀ is, C [] is)
(H1 : ∀ t ts is, C ts (t::is) → C is [] → C (t::ts) is) : ∀ l₁ l₂, C l₁ l₂
| [] is := H0 is
| (t::ts) is :=
have h1 : ⟨ts, t :: is⟩ ≺ ⟨t :: ts, is⟩, from
show prod.lex _ _ (succ (length ts + length is), length ts) (succ (length ts) + length is, length (t :: ts)),
by rw nat.succ_add; exact prod.lex.right _ _ (lt_succ_self _),
have h2 : ⟨is, []⟩ ≺ ⟨t :: ts, is⟩, from prod.lex.left _ _ _ (lt_add_of_pos_left _ (succ_pos _)),
H1 t ts is (permutations_aux.rec ts (t::is)) (permutations_aux.rec is [])
using_well_founded {
dec_tac := tactic.assumption,
rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨(≺), @inv_image.wf _ _ _ meas (prod.lex_wf lt_wf lt_wf)⟩] }
def permutations_aux : list α → list α → list (list α) :=
@@permutations_aux.rec (λ _ _, list (list α)) (λ is, [])
(λ t ts is IH1 IH2, foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2) IH1 (is :: IH2))
/-- List of all permutations of `l`.
permutations [1, 2, 3] =
[[1, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3], [3, 2, 1],
[2, 3, 1], [3, 1, 2], [1, 3, 2]] -/
def permutations (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
l :: permutations_aux l []
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by simp [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by simp [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec, permutations]
end permutations
/- insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp [insert.def, h]
@[simp] theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp [insert.def, h]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l; simp [h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h'
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; simp *
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by simp [h]
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by simp [h]
end insert
/- erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : (b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp [erase_cons]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) : (b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp [erase_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [(ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l with b l ih; [cases h, {
simp at h,
by_cases e : b = a,
{ subst b, exact ⟨[], l, not_mem_nil _, rfl, by simp⟩ },
{ exact let ⟨l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ih (h.resolve_left (ne.symm e)) in
⟨b::l₁, l₂, not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (ne.symm e) h₁,
by rw h₂; refl,
by simp [e, h₃]⟩ } }]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq h with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, _, rfl, rfl⟩ := by simp [-add_comm]; refl
end
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : x = a; simp [h'],
rw erase_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (ne.symm h') h)
end
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∉ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [*, (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h)]
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
if h : a ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq h with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, _, rfl, rfl⟩ := by simp
end else by simp [h]
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist (erase_sublist a l)
theorem erase_sublist_erase (a : α) : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil := sublist.slnil
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ b s) := if h : b = a
then by rw [h, erase_cons_head]; exact (erase_sublist _ _).trans s
else by rw erase_cons_tail _ h; exact (erase_sublist_erase s).cons _ _ _
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ b s) := if h : b = a
then by rw [h, erase_cons_head, erase_cons_head]; exact s
else by rw [erase_cons_tail _ h, erase_cons_tail _ h]; exact (erase_sublist_erase s).cons2 _ _ _
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erase, λ al,
if h : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase b, exists_erase_eq h, al with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, _, rfl, rfl⟩, al := by simpa [ab] using al
end else by simp [h, al]⟩
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by simp [ab] else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp [hb, mt mem_of_mem_erase hb]
else by simp [ha, mt mem_of_mem_erase ha]
end erase
/- diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
by by_cases a ∈ l₁; simp [list.diff, h]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp [diff_eq_foldl]
end diff
/- zip & unzip -/
@[simp] theorem zip_cons_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip (a :: l₁) (b :: l₂) = (a, b) :: zip l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_left (l : list α) : zip ([] : list β) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_right (l : list α) : zip l ([] : list β) = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem unzip_nil : unzip (@nil (α × β)) = ([], []) := rfl
@[simp] theorem unzip_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l : list (α × β)) :
unzip ((a, b) :: l) = (a :: (unzip l).1, b :: (unzip l).2) :=
by rw unzip; cases unzip l; refl
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ (l : list (α × β)), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
| [] := rfl
| ((a, b) :: l) := by simp [zip_unzip l]
/- enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp [enum]
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
/- product -/
/-- `product l₁ l₂` is the list of pairs `(a, b)` where `a ∈ l₁` and `b ∈ l₂`.
product [1, 2] [5, 6] = [(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6)] -/
def product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) : list (α × β) :=
l₁.bind $ λ a, l₂.map $ prod.mk a
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp [product, and.left_comm]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; simp [*, right_distrib]
/- sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
/-- `sigma l₁ l₂` is the list of dependent pairs `(a, b)` where `a ∈ l₁` and `b ∈ l₂ a`.
sigma [1, 2] (λ_, [5, 6]) = [(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6)] -/
def sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) : list (Σ a, σ a) :=
l₁.bind $ λ a, (l₂ a).map $ sigma.mk a
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp [sigma, and.left_comm]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (sigma l₁ l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; simp *
end
/- disjoint -/
section disjoint
/-- `disjoint l₁ l₂` means that `l₁` and `l₂` have no elements in common. -/
def disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → false
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
@[simp] theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp [disjoint]; refl
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp [disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp [disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
end disjoint
/- union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp [*, or_assoc]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
by simp [e.symm]; by_cases h : a ∈ t ++ l₂;
[existsi t, existsi a::t]; simp [h];
[apply sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, apply cons_sublist_cons _ s]
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/- inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
end inter
/- bag_inter -/
section bag_inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_bag_inter (l : list α) : [].bag_inter l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem bag_inter_nil (l : list α) : l.bag_inter [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem cons_bag_inter_of_pos {a} (l₁ : list α) {l₂} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bag_inter l₂ = a :: l₁.bag_inter (l₂.erase a) :=
by cases l₂; exact if_pos h
@[simp] theorem cons_bag_inter_of_neg {a} (l₁ : list α) {l₂} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bag_inter l₂ = l₁.bag_inter l₂ :=
by cases l₂; simp [h, list.bag_inter]
theorem mem_bag_inter {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁.bag_inter l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂
| [] l₂ := by simp
| (b::l₁) l₂ := by
by_cases b ∈ l₂; simp [*, and_or_distrib_left];
by_cases ba : a = b; simp *
theorem bag_inter_sublist_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.bag_inter l₂ <+ l₁
| [] l₂ := by simp [nil_sublist]
| (b::l₁) l₂ := begin
by_cases b ∈ l₂; simp [h],
{ apply cons_sublist_cons, apply bag_inter_sublist_left },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist, apply bag_inter_sublist_left }
end
end bag_inter
/- pairwise relation (generalized no duplicate) -/
section pairwise
variable (R : α → α → Prop)
/-- `pairwise R l` means that all the elements with earlier indexes are
`R`-related to all the elements with later indexes.
pairwise R [1, 2, 3] ↔ R 1 2 ∧ R 1 3 ∧ R 2 3
For example if `R = (≠)` then it asserts `l` has no duplicates,
and if `R = (<)` then it asserts that `l` is (strictly) sorted. -/
inductive pairwise : list α → Prop
| nil : pairwise []
| cons : ∀ {a : α} {l : list α}, (∀ a' ∈ l, R a a') → pairwise l → pairwise (a::l)
attribute [simp] pairwise.nil
variable {R}
@[simp] theorem pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
pairwise R (a::l) ↔ (∀ a' ∈ l, R a a') ∧ pairwise R l :=
⟨λ p, by cases p with a l n p; exact ⟨n, p⟩, λ ⟨n, p⟩, p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R (a::l)) : ∀ {a'}, a' ∈ l → R a a' :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).1
theorem pairwise_of_pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R (a::l)) : pairwise R l :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).2
theorem pairwise.imp_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → R a b → S a b) (p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S l :=
begin
induction p with a l r p IH generalizing H; constructor,
{ exact ball.imp_right
(λ x h, H (mem_cons_self _ _) (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)) r },
{ exact IH (λ a b m m', H
(mem_cons_of_mem _ m) (mem_cons_of_mem _ m')) }
end
theorem pairwise.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {l : list α} : pairwise R l → pairwise S l :=
pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b _ _, H a b)
theorem pairwise.iff_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → (R a b ↔ S a b)) : pairwise R l ↔ pairwise S l :=
⟨pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b m m', (H m m').1),
pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b m m', (H m m').2)⟩
theorem pairwise.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {l : list α} : pairwise R l ↔ pairwise S l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (λ a b _ _, H a b)
theorem pairwise_of_forall {l : list α} (H : ∀ x y, R x y) : pairwise R l :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem pairwise.and_mem {l : list α} :
pairwise R l ↔ pairwise (λ x y, x ∈ l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (by simp {contextual := tt})
theorem pairwise.imp_mem {l : list α} :
pairwise R l ↔ pairwise (λ x y, x ∈ l → y ∈ l → R x y) l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (by simp {contextual := tt})
theorem pairwise_of_sublist : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → pairwise R l₂ → pairwise R l₁
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) (pairwise.cons i n) := pairwise_of_sublist s n
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) (pairwise.cons i n) :=
(pairwise_of_sublist s n).cons (ball.imp_left (subset_of_sublist s) i)
theorem pairwise_singleton (R) (a : α) : pairwise R [a] :=
by simp
theorem pairwise_pair {a b : α} : pairwise R [a, b] ↔ R a b :=
by simp
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : pairwise R (l₁++l₂) ↔
pairwise R l₁ ∧ pairwise R l₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ l₁, ∀ y ∈ l₂, R x y :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; simp [*,
or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
theorem pairwise_app_comm (s : symmetric R) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
pairwise R (l₁++l₂) ↔ pairwise R (l₂++l₁) :=
have ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α,
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₁ → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ l₂ → R x y) →
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₂ → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ l₁ → R x y),
from λ l₁ l₂ a x xm y ym, s (a y ym x xm),
by simp [pairwise_append, and.left_comm]; rw iff.intro (this l₁ l₂) (this l₂ l₁)
theorem pairwise_middle (s : symmetric R) {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
pairwise R (l₁ ++ a::l₂) ↔ pairwise R (a::(l₁++l₂)) :=
show pairwise R (l₁ ++ ([a] ++ l₂)) ↔ pairwise R ([a] ++ l₁ ++ l₂),
by rw [← append_assoc, pairwise_append, @pairwise_append _ _ ([a] ++ l₁), pairwise_app_comm s];
simp only [mem_append, or_comm]
theorem pairwise_map (f : β → α) :
∀ {l : list β}, pairwise R (map f l) ↔ pairwise (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) l
| [] := by simp
| (b::l) :=
have (∀ a b', b' ∈ l → f b' = a → R (f b) a) ↔ ∀ (b' : β), b' ∈ l → R (f b) (f b'), from
forall_swap.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a, forall_swap.trans $ by simp,
by simp *; rw this
theorem pairwise_of_pairwise_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {l : list α}
(p : pairwise S (map f l)) : pairwise R l :=
((pairwise_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem pairwise_map_of_pairwise {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S (map f l) :=
(pairwise_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem pairwise_filter_map (f : β → option α) {l : list β} :
pairwise R (filter_map f l) ↔ pairwise (λ a a' : β, ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), R b b') l :=
let S (a a' : β) := ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), R b b' in
begin
simp, induction l with a l IH; simp,
cases e : f a with b; simp [e, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ e], simp [IH],
show (∀ (a' : α) (x : β), x ∈ l → f x = some a' → R b a') ∧ pairwise S l ↔
(∀ (a' : β), a' ∈ l → ∀ (b' : α), f a' = some b' → R b b') ∧ pairwise S l,
from and_congr ⟨λ h b mb a ma, h a b mb ma, λ h a b mb ma, h b mb a ma⟩ iff.rfl
end
theorem pairwise_filter_map_of_pairwise {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → option β)
(H : ∀ (a a' : α), R a a' → ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), S b b') {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S (filter_map f l) :=
(pairwise_filter_map _).2 $ p.imp H
theorem pairwise_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} :
pairwise R (filter p l) ↔ pairwise (λ x y, p x → p y → R x y) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, pairwise_filter_map],
apply pairwise.iff, simp
end
theorem pairwise_filter_of_pairwise (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l : list α}
: pairwise R l → pairwise R (filter p l) :=
pairwise_of_sublist (filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_join {L : list (list α)} : pairwise R (join L) ↔
(∀ l ∈ L, pairwise R l) ∧ pairwise (λ l₁ l₂, ∀ (x ∈ l₁) (y ∈ l₂), R x y) L :=
begin
induction L with l L IH, {simp},
have : (∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → ∀ (y : α) (x_1 : list α), x_1 ∈ L → y ∈ x_1 → R x y) ↔
∀ (a' : list α), a' ∈ L → ∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ a' → R x y :=
⟨λ h a b c d e, h c d e a b, λ h c d e a b, h a b c d e⟩,
simp [pairwise_append, IH, this], simp [and_assoc, and_comm, and.left_comm],
end
@[simp] theorem pairwise_reverse : ∀ {R} {l : list α},
pairwise R (reverse l) ↔ pairwise (λ x y, R y x) l :=
suffices ∀ {R l}, @pairwise α R l → pairwise (λ x y, R y x) (reverse l),
from λ R l, ⟨λ p, reverse_reverse l ▸ this p, this⟩,
λ R l p, by induction p with a l h p IH;
[simp, simpa [pairwise_append, IH] using h]
theorem pairwise_iff_nth_le {R} : ∀ {l : list α},
pairwise R l ↔ ∀ i j (h₁ : j < length l) (h₂ : i < j), R (nth_le l i (lt_trans h₂ h₁)) (nth_le l j h₁)
| [] := by simp; exact λ i j h, (not_lt_zero j).elim h
| (a::l) := begin
rw [pairwise_cons, pairwise_iff_nth_le],
refine ⟨λ H i j h₁ h₂, _, λ H, ⟨λ a' m, _,
λ i j h₁ h₂, H _ _ (succ_lt_succ h₁) (succ_lt_succ h₂)⟩⟩,
{ cases j with j, {exact (not_lt_zero _).elim h₂},
cases i with i,
{ apply H.1, simp [nth_le_mem] },
{ exact H.2 _ _ (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₁) (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₂) } },
{ rcases nth_le_of_mem m with ⟨n, h, rfl⟩,
exact H _ _ (succ_lt_succ h) (succ_pos _) }
end
inductive lex (R : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {} (a l) : lex [] (a::l)
| cons {} (a) {l l'} : lex l l' → lex (a::l) (a::l')
| rel {a a'} (l l') : R a a' → lex (a::l) (a'::l')
theorem lex_append_right (R : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex R s₁ s₂ → lex R s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t (lex.nil a l) := lex.nil _ _
| _ _ t (lex.cons a h) := lex.cons _ (lex_append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (lex.rel _ _ r) := lex.rel _ _ r
theorem lex_append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := lex.cons _ (lex_append_left l)
theorem lex.imp {R S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex R l₁ l₂ → lex S l₁ l₂
| _ _ (lex.nil a l) := lex.nil _ _
| _ _ (lex.cons a h) := lex.cons _ (lex.imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (lex.rel _ _ r) := lex.rel _ _ (H _ _ r)
theorem ne_of_lex_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (lex.cons a h) e := ne_of_lex_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (lex.rel _ _ r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem lex_ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨ne_of_lex_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply lex.nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply lex.cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact lex.rel _ _ ab } }
end⟩
theorem pairwise_sublists' {R} : ∀ {l : list α}, pairwise R l →
pairwise (lex (swap R)) (sublists' l)
| _ (pairwise.nil _) := pairwise_singleton _ _
| _ (@pairwise.cons _ _ a l H₁ H₂) :=
begin
simp [pairwise_append, pairwise_map],
have IH := pairwise_sublists' H₂,
refine ⟨IH, IH.imp (λ l₁ l₂, lex.cons _), _⟩,
intros l₁ sl₁ x l₂ sl₂ e, subst e,
cases l₁ with b l₁, {constructor},
exact lex.rel _ _ (H₁ _ $ subset_of_sublist sl₁ $ mem_cons_self _ _)
end
theorem pairwise_sublists {R} {l : list α} (H : pairwise R l) :
pairwise (λ l₁ l₂, lex R (reverse l₁) (reverse l₂)) (sublists l) :=
by have := pairwise_sublists' (pairwise_reverse.2 H);
rwa [sublists'_reverse, pairwise_map] at this
variable [decidable_rel R]
instance decidable_pairwise (l : list α) : decidable (pairwise R l) :=
by induction l; simp; resetI; apply_instance
/- pairwise reduct -/
/-- `pw_filter R l` is a maximal sublist of `l` which is `pairwise R`.
`pw_filter (≠)` is the erase duplicates function, and `pw_filter (<)` finds
a maximal increasing subsequence in `l`. For example,
pw_filter (<) [0, 1, 5, 2, 6, 3, 4] = [0, 1, 5, 6] -/
def pw_filter (R : α → α → Prop) [decidable_rel R] : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (x :: xs) := let IH := pw_filter xs in if ∀ y ∈ IH, R x y then x :: IH else IH
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_nil : pw_filter R [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) :
pw_filter R (a::l) = a :: pw_filter R l := if_pos h
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ ∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) :
pw_filter R (a::l) = pw_filter R l := if_neg h
theorem pw_filter_sublist : ∀ (l : list α), pw_filter R l <+ l
| [] := nil_sublist _
| (x::l) := begin
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y); dsimp at h,
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact cons_sublist_cons _ (pw_filter_sublist l) },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ (pw_filter_sublist l) },
end
theorem pw_filter_subset (l : list α) : pw_filter R l ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist (pw_filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_pw_filter : ∀ (l : list α), pairwise R (pw_filter R l)
| [] := pairwise.nil _
| (x::l) := begin
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y); dsimp at h,
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact pairwise_cons.2 ⟨h, pairwise_pw_filter l⟩ },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
exact pairwise_pw_filter l },
end
theorem pw_filter_eq_self {l : list α} : pw_filter R l = l ↔ pairwise R l :=
⟨λ e, e ▸ pairwise_pw_filter l, λ p, begin
induction l with x l IH, {simp},
cases pairwise_cons.1 p with al p,
rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos (ball.imp_left (pw_filter_subset l) al), IH p],
end⟩
theorem forall_mem_pw_filter (neg_trans : ∀ {x y z}, R x z → R x y ∨ R y z)
(a : α) (l : list α) : (∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) ↔ (∀ b ∈ l, R a b) :=
⟨begin
induction l with x l IH; simp *,
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y); dsimp at h,
{ simp [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact λ r H, ⟨r, IH H⟩ },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
refine λ H, ⟨_, IH H⟩,
cases e : find (λ y, ¬ R x y) (pw_filter R l) with k,
{ refine h.elim (ball.imp_right _ (find_eq_none.1 e)),
exact λ y _, not_not.1 },
{ have := find_some e,
exact (neg_trans (H k (find_mem e))).resolve_right this } }
end, ball.imp_left (pw_filter_subset l)⟩
end pairwise
/- chain relation (conjunction of R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d ...) -/
section chain
variable (R : α → α → Prop)
/-- `chain R a l` means that `R` holds between adjacent elements of `a::l`.
`chain R a [b, c, d] ↔ R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d` -/
inductive chain : α → list α → Prop
| nil (a : α) : chain a []
| cons : ∀ {a b : α} {l : list α}, R a b → chain b l → chain a (b::l)
attribute [simp] chain.nil
variable {R}
@[simp] theorem chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a (b::l) ↔ R a b ∧ chain R b l :=
⟨λ p, by cases p with _ a b l n p; exact ⟨n, p⟩, λ ⟨n, p⟩, p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem chain.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} (p : chain R a l) : chain S a l :=
by induction p with _ a b l r p IH; constructor;
[exact H _ _ r, exact IH]
theorem chain.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} : chain R a l ↔ chain S a l :=
⟨chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).1), chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).2)⟩
theorem chain.iff_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ chain (λ x y, x ∈ a :: l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) a l :=
⟨λ p, by induction p with _ a b l r p IH; constructor;
[exact ⟨mem_cons_self _ _, mem_cons_self _ _, r⟩,
exact IH.imp (λ a b ⟨am, bm, h⟩,
⟨mem_cons_of_mem _ am, mem_cons_of_mem _ bm, h⟩)],
chain.imp (λ a b h, h.2.2)⟩
theorem chain_singleton {a b : α} : chain R a [b] ↔ R a b :=
by simp
theorem chain_split {a b : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : chain R a (l₁++b::l₂) ↔
chain R a (l₁++[b]) ∧ chain R b l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH generalizing a; simp [*, and_assoc]
theorem chain_map (f : β → α) {b : β} {l : list β} :
chain R (f b) (map f l) ↔ chain (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) b l :=
by induction l generalizing b; simp *
theorem chain_of_chain_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain S (f a) (map f l)) : chain R a l :=
((chain_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem chain_map_of_chain {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a l) : chain S (f a) (map f l) :=
(chain_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem chain_of_pairwise {a : α} {l : list α} (p : pairwise R (a::l)) : chain R a l :=
begin
cases pairwise_cons.1 p with r p', clear p,
induction p' with b l r' p IH generalizing a; simp,
simp at r, simp [r],
show chain R b l, from IH r'
end
theorem chain_iff_pairwise (tr : transitive R) {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ pairwise R (a::l) :=
⟨λ c, begin
induction c with b b c l r p IH, {simp},
apply IH.cons _, simp [r],
show ∀ x ∈ l, R b x, from λ x m, (tr r (rel_of_pairwise_cons IH m)),
end, chain_of_pairwise⟩
instance decidable_chain [decidable_rel R] (a : α) (l : list α) : decidable (chain R a l) :=
by induction l generalizing a; simp; resetI; apply_instance
end chain
/- no duplicates predicate -/
/-- `nodup l` means that `l` has no duplicates, that is, any element appears at most
once in the list. It is defined as `pairwise (≠)`. -/
def nodup : list α → Prop := pairwise (≠)
section nodup
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_ne {a : α} {l : list α} : (∀ (a' : α), a' ∈ l → ¬a = a') ↔ a ∉ l :=
⟨λ h m, h _ m rfl, λ h a' m e, h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_nil : @nodup α [] := pairwise.nil _
@[simp] theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : nodup (a::l) ↔ a ∉ l ∧ nodup l :=
by simp [nodup]
theorem nodup_cons_of_nodup {a : α} {l : list α} (m : a ∉ l) (n : nodup l) : nodup (a::l) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨m, n⟩
theorem nodup_singleton (a : α) : nodup [a] :=
nodup_cons_of_nodup (not_mem_nil a) nodup_nil
theorem nodup_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : nodup l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
theorem not_mem_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : a ∉ l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
theorem not_nodup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l → ¬ nodup (a :: l) :=
imp_not_comm.1 not_mem_of_nodup_cons
theorem nodup_of_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → nodup l₂ → nodup l₁ :=
pairwise_of_sublist
theorem not_nodup_pair (a : α) : ¬ nodup [a, a] :=
not_nodup_cons_of_mem $ mem_singleton_self _
theorem nodup_iff_sublist {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, ¬ [a, a] <+ l :=
⟨λ d a h, not_nodup_pair a (nodup_of_sublist h d), begin
induction l with a l IH; intro h, {simp},
exact nodup_cons_of_nodup
(λ al, h a $ cons_sublist_cons _ $ singleton_sublist.2 al)
(IH $ λ a s, h a $ sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s)
end⟩
theorem nodup_iff_nth_le_inj {l : list α} :
nodup l ↔ ∀ i j h₁ h₂, nth_le l i h₁ = nth_le l j h₂ → i = j :=
pairwise_iff_nth_le.trans
⟨λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ((lt_trichotomy _ _)
.resolve_left (λ h', H _ _ h₂ h' h))
.resolve_right (λ h', H _ _ h₁ h' h.symm),
λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ne_of_lt h₂ (H _ _ _ _ h)⟩
@[simp] theorem nth_le_index_of [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (H : nodup l) (n h) : index_of (nth_le l n h) l = n :=
nodup_iff_nth_le_inj.1 H _ _ _ h $
index_of_nth_le $ index_of_lt_length.2 $ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, count a l ≤ 1 :=
nodup_iff_sublist.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a,
have [a, a] <+ l ↔ 1 < count a l, from (@le_count_iff_repeat_sublist _ _ a l 2).symm,
(not_congr this).trans not_lt
@[simp] theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α}
(d : nodup l) (h : a ∈ l) : count a l = 1 :=
le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (count_pos.2 h)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₁ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₂ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup l₁ ∧ nodup l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp [nodup, pairwise_append, disjoint_iff_ne]
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : nodup (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(nodup_append.1 d).2.2
theorem nodup_append_of_nodup {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) (dj : disjoint l₁ l₂) : nodup (l₁++l₂) :=
nodup_append.2 ⟨d₁, d₂, dj⟩
theorem nodup_app_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup (l₂++l₁) :=
by simp [nodup_append, and.left_comm]
theorem nodup_middle {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁ ++ a::l₂) ↔ nodup (a::(l₁++l₂)) :=
by simp [nodup_append, not_or_distrib, and.left_comm, and_assoc]
theorem nodup_of_nodup_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} : nodup (map f l) → nodup l :=
pairwise_of_pairwise_map f $ λ a b, mt $ congr_arg f
theorem nodup_map_on {f : α → β} {l : list α} (H : ∀x∈l, ∀y∈l, f x = f y → x = y)
(d : nodup l) : nodup (map f l) :=
pairwise_map_of_pairwise _ (by exact λ a b ⟨ma, mb, n⟩ e, n (H a ma b mb e)) (pairwise.and_mem.1 d)
theorem nodup_map {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup l → nodup (map f l) :=
nodup_map_on (assume x _ y _ h, hf h)
theorem nodup_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup (map f l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨nodup_of_nodup_map _, nodup_map hf⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_attach {l : list α} : nodup (attach l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, attach_map_val l ▸ nodup_map (λ a b, subtype.eq) h,
λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map subtype.val ((attach_map_val l).symm ▸ h)⟩
theorem nodup_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {l : list α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h : nodup l) : nodup (pmap f l H) :=
by rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]; exact nodup_map
(λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h, by congr; exact hf a (H _ ha) b (H _ hb) h)
(nodup_attach.2 h)
theorem nodup_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l} : nodup l → nodup (filter p l) :=
pairwise_filter_of_pairwise p
@[simp] theorem nodup_reverse {l : list α} : nodup (reverse l) ↔ nodup l :=
pairwise_reverse.trans $ by simp [nodup, eq_comm]
instance nodup_decidable [decidable_eq α] : ∀ l : list α, decidable (nodup l) :=
list.decidable_pairwise
theorem nodup_erase_eq_filter [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} (d : nodup l) : l.erase a = filter (≠ a) l :=
begin
induction d with b l m d IH; simp [list.erase, list.filter],
by_cases b = a; simp *, subst b,
show l = filter (λ a', ¬ a' = a) l, rw filter_eq_self.2,
simpa only [eq_comm] using m
end
theorem nodup_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} : nodup l → nodup (l.erase a) :=
nodup_of_sublist (erase_sublist _ _)
theorem mem_erase_iff_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a b : α} {l} (d : nodup l) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l :=
by rw nodup_erase_eq_filter b d; simp [and_comm]
theorem mem_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l} (h : nodup l) : a ∉ l.erase a :=
by rw mem_erase_iff_of_nodup h; simp
theorem nodup_join {L : list (list α)} : nodup (join L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, nodup l) ∧ pairwise disjoint L :=
by simp [nodup, pairwise_join, disjoint_left.symm]
theorem nodup_bind {l₁ : list α} {f : α → list β} : nodup (l₁.bind f) ↔
(∀ x ∈ l₁, nodup (f x)) ∧ pairwise (λ (a b : α), disjoint (f a) (f b)) l₁ :=
by simp [list.bind, nodup_join, pairwise_map, and_comm, and.left_comm];
rw [show (∀ (l : list β) (x : α), f x = l → x ∈ l₁ → nodup l) ↔
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₁ → nodup (f x)),
from forall_swap.trans $ forall_congr $ λ_, by simp]
theorem nodup_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) :
nodup (product l₁ l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (injective_of_left_inverse (λ b, (rfl : (a,b).2 = b))) d₂,
d₁.imp (λ a₁ a₂ n x,
suffices ∀ (b₁ : β), b₁ ∈ l₂ → (a₁, b₁) = x → ∀ (b₂ : β), b₂ ∈ l₂ → (a₂, b₂) ≠ x, by simpa,
λ b₁ mb₁ e b₂ mb₂ e', by subst e'; injection e; contradiction)⟩
theorem nodup_sigma {σ : α → Type*} {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)}
(d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : ∀ a, nodup (l₂ a)) : nodup (sigma l₁ l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (λ b b' h, by injection h with _ h; exact eq_of_heq h) (d₂ a),
d₁.imp (λ a₁ a₂ n x,
suffices ∀ (b₁ : σ a₁), sigma.mk a₁ b₁ = x → b₁ ∈ l₂ a₁ →
∀ (b₂ : σ a₂), sigma.mk a₂ b₂ = x → b₂ ∉ l₂ a₂, by simpa [and_comm],
λ b₁ e mb₁ b₂ e' mb₂, by subst e'; injection e; contradiction)⟩
theorem nodup_filter_map {f : α → option β} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ (a a' : α) (b : β), b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') :
nodup l → nodup (filter_map f l) :=
pairwise_filter_map_of_pairwise f $ λ a a' n b bm b' bm' e, n $ H a a' b' (e ▸ bm) bm'
theorem nodup_concat {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) (h' : nodup l) : nodup (concat l a) :=
by simp; exact nodup_append_of_nodup h' (nodup_singleton _) (disjoint_singleton.2 h)
theorem nodup_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup l) : nodup (insert a l) :=
by by_cases h' : a ∈ l; simp [h', h]; apply nodup_cons h' h
theorem nodup_union [decidable_eq α] (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : nodup l₂) :
nodup (l₁ ∪ l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ ih generalizing l₂,
{ exact h },
simp,
apply nodup_insert,
exact ih h
end
theorem nodup_inter_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {l₁ : list α} (l₂) : nodup l₁ → nodup (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
nodup_filter _
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists {l : list α} : nodup (sublists l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map _ (nodup_of_sublist (map_ret_sublist_sublists _) h),
λ h, (pairwise_sublists h).imp (λ _ _ h, mt reverse_inj.2 (ne_of_lex_ne h))⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists' {l : list α} : nodup (sublists' l) ↔ nodup l :=
by rw [sublists'_eq_sublists, nodup_map_iff reverse_injective,
nodup_sublists, nodup_reverse]
end nodup
/- erase duplicates function -/
section erase_dup
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `erase_dup l` removes duplicates from `l` (taking only the first occurrence).
erase_dup [1, 2, 2, 0, 1] = [1, 2, 0] -/
def erase_dup : list α → list α := pw_filter (≠)
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_nil : erase_dup [] = ([] : list α) := rfl
theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ erase_dup l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_neg $ by simpa using h
theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ erase_dup l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = a :: erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_pos $ by simpa using h
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_dup {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ erase_dup l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simpa using not_congr (@forall_mem_pw_filter α (≠) _
(λ x y z xz, not_and_distrib.1 $ mt (and.rec eq.trans) xz) a l)
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = erase_dup l :=
erase_dup_cons_of_mem' $ mem_erase_dup.2 h
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = a :: erase_dup l :=
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' $ mt mem_erase_dup.1 h
theorem erase_dup_sublist : ∀ (l : list α), erase_dup l <+ l := pw_filter_sublist
theorem erase_dup_subset : ∀ (l : list α), erase_dup l ⊆ l := pw_filter_subset
theorem subset_erase_dup (l : list α) : l ⊆ erase_dup l :=
λ a, mem_erase_dup.2
theorem nodup_erase_dup : ∀ l : list α, nodup (erase_dup l) := pairwise_pw_filter
theorem erase_dup_eq_self {l : list α} : erase_dup l = l ↔ nodup l := pw_filter_eq_self
theorem erase_dup_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ∪ erase_dup l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH; simp, rw ← IH,
show erase_dup (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) = insert a (erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂)),
by_cases a ∈ erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂);
[ rw [erase_dup_cons_of_mem' h, insert_of_mem h],
rw [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' h, insert_of_not_mem h]]
end
end erase_dup
/- iota and range -/
/-- `range' s n` is the list of numbers `[s, s+1, ..., s+n-1]`.
It is intended mainly for proving properties of `range` and `iota`. -/
@[simp] def range' : ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| s 0 := []
| s (n+1) := s :: range' (s+1) n
@[simp] theorem length_range' : ∀ (s n : ℕ), length (range' s n) = n
| s 0 := rfl
| s (n+1) := congr_arg succ (length_range' _ _)
@[simp] theorem mem_range' {m : ℕ} : ∀ {s n : ℕ}, m ∈ range' s n ↔ s ≤ m ∧ m < s + n
| s 0 := by simp
| s (n+1) :=
have m = s → m < s + (n + 1),
from λ e, e ▸ lt_succ_of_le (le_add_right _ _),
have l : m = s ∨ s + 1 ≤ m ↔ s ≤ m,
by simpa [eq_comm] using (@le_iff_eq_or_lt _ _ s m).symm,
by simp [@mem_range' (s+1) n, or_and_distrib_left, or_iff_right_of_imp this, l]
theorem chain_succ_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, chain (λ a b, b = succ a) s (range' (s+1) n)
| s 0 := chain.nil _ _
| s (n+1) := (chain_succ_range' (s+1) n).cons rfl
theorem chain_lt_range' (s n : ℕ) : chain (<) s (range' (s+1) n) :=
(chain_succ_range' s n).imp (λ a b e, e.symm ▸ lt_succ_self _)
theorem pairwise_lt_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, pairwise (<) (range' s n)
| s 0 := pairwise.nil _
| s (n+1) := (chain_iff_pairwise (by exact λ a b c, lt_trans)).1 (chain_lt_range' s n)
theorem nodup_range' (s n : ℕ) : nodup (range' s n) :=
(pairwise_lt_range' s n).imp (λ a b, ne_of_lt)
theorem range'_append : ∀ s m n : ℕ, range' s m ++ range' (s+m) n = range' s (n+m)
| s 0 n := rfl
| s (m+1) n := show s :: (range' (s+1) m ++ range' (s+m+1) n) = s :: range' (s+1) (n+m),
by rw [add_right_comm, range'_append]
theorem range'_sublist_right {s m n : ℕ} : range' s m <+ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by rw [← nat.sub_add_cancel h, ← range'_append]; apply sublist_append_left⟩
theorem range'_subset_right {s m n : ℕ} : range' s m ⊆ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn, lt_irrefl (s+n) $
(mem_range'.1 $ h $ mem_range'.2 ⟨le_add_right _ _, nat.add_lt_add_left hn s⟩).2,
λ h, subset_of_sublist (range'_sublist_right.2 h)⟩
theorem nth_range' : ∀ s {m n : ℕ}, m < n → nth (range' s n) m = some (s + m)
| s 0 (n+1) _ := by simp
| s (m+1) (n+1) h := by simp [nth_range' (s+1) (lt_of_add_lt_add_right h)]
theorem range'_concat (s n : ℕ) : range' s (n + 1) = range' s n ++ [s+n] :=
by rw add_comm n 1; exact (range'_append s n 1).symm
theorem range_core_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, range_core s (range' s n) = range' 0 (n + s)
| 0 n := rfl
| (s+1) n := by rw [show n+(s+1) = n+1+s, by simp]; exact range_core_range' s (n+1)
theorem range_eq_range' (n : ℕ) : range n = range' 0 n :=
(range_core_range' n 0).trans $ by rw zero_add
@[simp] theorem length_range (n : ℕ) : length (range n) = n :=
by simp [range_eq_range']
theorem pairwise_lt_range (n : ℕ) : pairwise (<) (range n) :=
by simp [range_eq_range', pairwise_lt_range']
theorem nodup_range (n : ℕ) : nodup (range n) :=
by simp [range_eq_range', nodup_range']
theorem range_sublist {m n : ℕ} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by simp [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
theorem range_subset {m n : ℕ} : range m ⊆ range n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by simp [range_eq_range', range'_subset_right]
@[simp] theorem mem_range {m n : ℕ} : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n :=
by simp [range_eq_range', zero_le]
@[simp] theorem not_mem_range_self {n : ℕ} : n ∉ range n :=
mt mem_range.1 $ lt_irrefl _
theorem nth_range {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : nth (range n) m = some m :=
by simp [range_eq_range', nth_range' _ h]
theorem range_concat (n : ℕ) : range (n + 1) = range n ++ [n] :=
by simp [range_eq_range', range'_concat]
theorem iota_eq_reverse_range' : ∀ n : ℕ, iota n = reverse (range' 1 n)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by simp [iota, range'_concat, iota_eq_reverse_range' n]
@[simp] theorem length_iota (n : ℕ) : length (iota n) = n :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range']
theorem pairwise_gt_iota (n : ℕ) : pairwise (>) (iota n) :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', pairwise_lt_range']
theorem nodup_iota (n : ℕ) : nodup (iota n) :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', nodup_range']
theorem mem_iota {m n : ℕ} : m ∈ iota n ↔ 1 ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_fst : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.fst (enum_from n l) = range' n l.length
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_fst _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_fst (l : list α) :
map prod.fst (enum l) = range l.length :=
by simp [enum, range_eq_range']
end list
|
84df0c95bfc8cfaeb6e128eff68f4eebe8e1011e | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/linear_algebra/matrix/hermitian.lean | d2d1767b917d4c0a76c9b710a479f81f3fe24d86 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,393 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import analysis.inner_product_space.pi_L2
/-! # Hermitian matrices
This file defines hermitian matrices and some basic results about them.
## Main definition
* `matrix.is_hermitian` : a matrix `A : matrix n n α` is hermitian if `Aᴴ = A`.
## Tags
self-adjoint matrix, hermitian matrix
-/
namespace matrix
variables {α β : Type*} {m n : Type*} {A : matrix n n α}
open_locale matrix
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner α (pi_Lp 2 (λ (_ : n), α)) _ x y
section non_unital_semiring
variables [non_unital_semiring α] [star_ring α] [non_unital_semiring β] [star_ring β]
/-- A matrix is hermitian if it is equal to its conjugate transpose. On the reals, this definition
captures symmetric matrices. -/
def is_hermitian (A : matrix n n α) : Prop := Aᴴ = A
lemma is_hermitian.eq {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) : Aᴴ = A := h
@[ext]
lemma is_hermitian.ext {A : matrix n n α} : (∀ i j, star (A j i) = A i j) → A.is_hermitian :=
by { intros h, ext i j, exact h i j }
lemma is_hermitian.apply {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) (i j : n) : star (A j i) = A i j :=
by { unfold is_hermitian at h, rw [← h, conj_transpose_apply, star_star, h] }
lemma is_hermitian.ext_iff {A : matrix n n α} : A.is_hermitian ↔ ∀ i j, star (A j i) = A i j :=
⟨is_hermitian.apply, is_hermitian.ext⟩
lemma is_hermitian_mul_conj_transpose_self [fintype n] (A : matrix n n α) :
(A ⬝ Aᴴ).is_hermitian :=
by rw [is_hermitian, conj_transpose_mul, conj_transpose_conj_transpose]
lemma is_hermitian_transpose_mul_self [fintype n] (A : matrix n n α) :
(Aᴴ ⬝ A).is_hermitian :=
by rw [is_hermitian, conj_transpose_mul, conj_transpose_conj_transpose]
lemma is_hermitian_conj_transpose_mul_mul [fintype m] {A : matrix m m α} (B : matrix m n α)
(hA : A.is_hermitian) : (Bᴴ ⬝ A ⬝ B).is_hermitian :=
by simp only [is_hermitian, conj_transpose_mul, conj_transpose_conj_transpose, hA.eq,
matrix.mul_assoc]
lemma is_hermitian_mul_mul_conj_transpose [fintype m] {A : matrix m m α} (B : matrix n m α)
(hA : A.is_hermitian) : (B ⬝ A ⬝ Bᴴ).is_hermitian :=
by simp only [is_hermitian, conj_transpose_mul, conj_transpose_conj_transpose, hA.eq,
matrix.mul_assoc]
lemma is_hermitian_add_transpose_self (A : matrix n n α) :
(A + Aᴴ).is_hermitian :=
by simp [is_hermitian, add_comm]
lemma is_hermitian_transpose_add_self (A : matrix n n α) :
(Aᴴ + A).is_hermitian :=
by simp [is_hermitian, add_comm]
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian_zero :
(0 : matrix n n α).is_hermitian :=
conj_transpose_zero
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian.map {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) (f : α → β)
(hf : function.semiconj f star star) :
(A.map f).is_hermitian :=
(conj_transpose_map f hf).symm.trans $ h.eq.symm ▸ rfl
lemma is_hermitian.transpose {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) :
Aᵀ.is_hermitian :=
by { rw [is_hermitian, conj_transpose, transpose_map], congr, exact h }
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian_transpose_iff (A : matrix n n α) :
Aᵀ.is_hermitian ↔ A.is_hermitian :=
⟨by { intro h, rw [← transpose_transpose A], exact is_hermitian.transpose h },
is_hermitian.transpose⟩
lemma is_hermitian.conj_transpose {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) :
Aᴴ.is_hermitian :=
h.transpose.map _ $ λ _, rfl
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian_conj_transpose_iff (A : matrix n n α) :
Aᴴ.is_hermitian ↔ A.is_hermitian :=
⟨by { intro h, rw [← conj_transpose_conj_transpose A], exact is_hermitian.conj_transpose h },
is_hermitian.conj_transpose⟩
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian.add {A B : matrix n n α} (hA : A.is_hermitian) (hB : B.is_hermitian) :
(A + B).is_hermitian :=
(conj_transpose_add _ _).trans (hA.symm ▸ hB.symm ▸ rfl)
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian.submatrix {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) (f : m → n) :
(A.submatrix f f).is_hermitian :=
(conj_transpose_submatrix _ _ _).trans (h.symm ▸ rfl)
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian_submatrix_equiv {A : matrix n n α} (e : m ≃ n) :
(A.submatrix e e).is_hermitian ↔ A.is_hermitian :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using h.submatrix e.symm, λ h, h.submatrix _⟩
/-- The real diagonal matrix `diagonal v` is hermitian. -/
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian_diagonal [decidable_eq n] (v : n → ℝ) :
(diagonal v).is_hermitian :=
diagonal_conj_transpose _
/-- A block matrix `A.from_blocks B C D` is hermitian,
if `A` and `D` are hermitian and `Bᴴ = C`. -/
lemma is_hermitian.from_blocks
{A : matrix m m α} {B : matrix m n α} {C : matrix n m α} {D : matrix n n α}
(hA : A.is_hermitian) (hBC : Bᴴ = C) (hD : D.is_hermitian) :
(A.from_blocks B C D).is_hermitian :=
begin
have hCB : Cᴴ = B, {rw ← hBC, simp},
unfold matrix.is_hermitian,
rw from_blocks_conj_transpose,
congr;
assumption
end
/-- This is the `iff` version of `matrix.is_hermitian.from_blocks`. -/
lemma is_hermitian_from_blocks_iff
{A : matrix m m α} {B : matrix m n α} {C : matrix n m α} {D : matrix n n α} :
(A.from_blocks B C D).is_hermitian ↔ A.is_hermitian ∧ Bᴴ = C ∧ Cᴴ = B ∧ D.is_hermitian :=
⟨λ h, ⟨congr_arg to_blocks₁₁ h, congr_arg to_blocks₂₁ h,
congr_arg to_blocks₁₂ h, congr_arg to_blocks₂₂ h⟩,
λ ⟨hA, hBC, hCB, hD⟩, is_hermitian.from_blocks hA hBC hD⟩
end non_unital_semiring
section semiring
variables [semiring α] [star_ring α] [semiring β] [star_ring β]
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian_one [decidable_eq n] :
(1 : matrix n n α).is_hermitian :=
conj_transpose_one
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring α] [star_ring α] [ring β] [star_ring β]
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian.neg {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) :
(-A).is_hermitian :=
(conj_transpose_neg _).trans (congr_arg _ h)
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian.sub {A B : matrix n n α} (hA : A.is_hermitian) (hB : B.is_hermitian) :
(A - B).is_hermitian :=
(conj_transpose_sub _ _).trans (hA.symm ▸ hB.symm ▸ rfl)
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring α] [star_ring α]
lemma is_hermitian.inv [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] {A : matrix m m α}
(hA : A.is_hermitian) : A⁻¹.is_hermitian :=
by simp [is_hermitian, conj_transpose_nonsing_inv, hA.eq]
@[simp] lemma is_hermitian_inv [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (A : matrix m m α) [invertible A]:
(A⁻¹).is_hermitian ↔ A.is_hermitian :=
⟨λ h, by {rw [← inv_inv_of_invertible A], exact is_hermitian.inv h }, is_hermitian.inv⟩
lemma is_hermitian.adjugate [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] {A : matrix m m α}
(hA : A.is_hermitian) : A.adjugate.is_hermitian :=
by simp [is_hermitian, adjugate_conj_transpose, hA.eq]
end comm_ring
section is_R_or_C
open is_R_or_C
variables [is_R_or_C α] [is_R_or_C β]
/-- The diagonal elements of a complex hermitian matrix are real. -/
lemma is_hermitian.coe_re_apply_self {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) (i : n) :
(re (A i i) : α) = A i i :=
by rw [←eq_conj_iff_re, ←star_def, ←conj_transpose_apply, h.eq]
/-- The diagonal elements of a complex hermitian matrix are real. -/
lemma is_hermitian.coe_re_diag {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.is_hermitian) :
(λ i, (re (A.diag i) : α)) = A.diag :=
funext h.coe_re_apply_self
/-- A matrix is hermitian iff the corresponding linear map is self adjoint. -/
lemma is_hermitian_iff_is_symmetric [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] {A : matrix n n α} :
is_hermitian A ↔ linear_map.is_symmetric
((pi_Lp.linear_equiv 2 α (λ _ : n, α)).symm.conj A.to_lin' : module.End α (pi_Lp 2 _)) :=
begin
rw [linear_map.is_symmetric, (pi_Lp.equiv 2 (λ _ : n, α)).symm.surjective.forall₂],
simp only [linear_equiv.conj_apply, linear_map.comp_apply, linear_equiv.coe_coe,
pi_Lp.linear_equiv_apply, pi_Lp.linear_equiv_symm_apply, linear_equiv.symm_symm],
simp_rw [euclidean_space.inner_eq_star_dot_product, equiv.apply_symm_apply, to_lin'_apply,
star_mul_vec, dot_product_mul_vec],
split,
{ rintro (h : Aᴴ = A) x y,
rw h },
{ intro h,
ext i j,
simpa only [(pi.single_star i 1).symm, ← star_mul_vec, mul_one, dot_product_single,
single_vec_mul, star_one, one_mul] using
h (@pi.single _ _ _ (λ i, add_zero_class.to_has_zero α) i 1)
(@pi.single _ _ _ (λ i, add_zero_class.to_has_zero α) j 1) }
end
end is_R_or_C
end matrix
|
bf47e4bee48c3fb73bb098128612ffb3c8f91f61 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/measurable.lean | 6bf30f1d2a32501a7cbdf99f0cf56042621ef2f8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 219 | lean | open prod nat
example (a b : nat) : size_of (a, true, bool.tt, (λ c d : nat, c + d), option.some b) = a + b :=
rfl
example : size_of (pair (pair (pair (2:nat) true) (λ a : nat, a)) (option.some (3:nat))) = 5 :=
rfl
|
f1b74f388d8dadbb85bd5bd39eb092f76939e1d7 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/logic/examples/negative.lean | e62fdf13430f0edf1f0d16bd7df4c513646ca5fd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 785 | lean | /-
This example demonstrates why allowing types such as
inductive D : Type :=
| intro : (D → D) → D
would make the system inconsistent
-/
/- If we were allowed to form the inductive type
inductive D : Type :=
| intro : (D → D) → D
we would get the following
-/
universe l
-- The new type A
axiom D : Type.{l}
-- The constructor
axiom introD : (D → D) → D
-- The eliminator
axiom recD : Π {C : D → Type}, (Π (f : D → D) (r : Π d, C (f d)), C (introD f)) → (Π (d : D), C d)
-- We would also get a computational rule for the eliminator, but we don't need it for deriving the inconsistency.
noncomputable definition id' : D → D := λd, d
noncomputable definition v : D := introD id'
theorem inconsistent : false :=
recD (λ f ih, ih v) v
|
d866331f1ab559f29a528543b9c95faf7b725cb9 | 5df84495ec6c281df6d26411cc20aac5c941e745 | /src/formal_ml/restrict.lean | 86846566a239710b69979197b90fdc0903ff0e18 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/formal-ml | e278df5a8df78aa3947bc8376650419e1b2b0a14 | 630011d19fdd9539c8d6493a69fe70af5d193590 | refs/heads/master | 1,681,491,589,256 | 1,612,642,743,000 | 1,612,642,743,000 | 360,114,136 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,998,189,000 | 1,618,998,188,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,965 | lean | /-
Copyright 2020 Google LLC
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/
import measure_theory.measurable_space
import measure_theory.measure_space
import measure_theory.outer_measure
namespace measure_theory
namespace measure
lemma inter_add_inter_compl {α:Type*} [measurable_space α]
(μ : measure α) (s t : set α) (A2 : measurable_set s) (A1 : measurable_set t) :
(μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s ∩ tᶜ)) = μ s :=
begin
rw ← measure_union _
(measurable_set.inter A2 A1) (measurable_set.inter A2 (measurable_set.compl A1)),
rw set.inter_union_compl,
apply set.disjoint_of_subset (set.inter_subset_right s t) (set.inter_subset_right s tᶜ),
apply @disjoint_compl_right (set α) t _,
end
lemma restrict_sub_eq_restrict_sub_restrict {Ω : Type*} [M : measurable_space Ω]
(μ ν : measure Ω) {s : set Ω} (h_meas_s : measurable_set s) :
(μ - ν).restrict s = (μ.restrict s) - (ν.restrict s) :=
begin
repeat {rw sub_def},
have h_nonempty : {d | μ ≤ d + ν}.nonempty,
{ apply @set.nonempty_of_mem _ _ μ, simp, intros t h_meas,
apply le_add_right (le_refl (μ t)) },
rw restrict_Inf_eq_Inf_restrict h_nonempty h_meas_s,
have h_Inf_le_Inf : ∀ s' t' : set (measure Ω),
(∀ b ∈ t', ∃ a ∈ s', a ≤ b) → Inf s' ≤ Inf t',
{ intros s' t' h,
rw le_Inf_iff, intros b h_b_in_t',
have h_exists_a := h b h_b_in_t', cases h_exists_a with a h_a,
cases h_a with h_a_in_s' h_a_le_b,
apply Inf_le_of_le h_a_in_s' h_a_le_b },
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply h_Inf_le_Inf,
intros ν' h_ν'_in, simp at h_ν'_in, apply exists.intro (ν'.restrict s),
split,
{ simp, apply exists.intro (ν' + (⊤ : measure_theory.measure Ω).restrict sᶜ),
split,
{ rw [add_assoc, add_comm _ ν, ← add_assoc, measure_theory.measure.le_iff],
intros t h_meas_t,
have h_inter_inter_eq_inter : ∀ t' : set Ω , t ∩ t' ∩ t' = t ∩ t',
{ intro t', rw set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left, apply set.inter_subset_right t t' },
have h_meas_t_inter_s : measurable_set (t ∩ s) :=
measurable_set.inter h_meas_t h_meas_s,
rw [← inter_add_inter_compl μ t s h_meas_t h_meas_s,
← inter_add_inter_compl
(ν' + ν + (⊤ : measure Ω).restrict sᶜ) t s h_meas_t h_meas_s],
apply add_le_add _ _; rw add_apply,
{ have h_restrict : ∀ μ₂ : measure Ω, μ₂ (t ∩ s) = μ₂.restrict s (t ∩ s),
{ intro μ₂, rw [restrict_apply h_meas_t_inter_s],
rw [(h_inter_inter_eq_inter s)] },
apply le_add_right _,
rw [add_apply, h_restrict μ, h_restrict ν], apply h_ν'_in _ h_meas_t_inter_s },
cases (@set.eq_empty_or_nonempty _ (t ∩ sᶜ)) with h_inter_empty h_inter_nonempty,
{ simp [h_inter_empty] },
{ have h_meas_inter_compl :=
measurable_set.inter h_meas_t (measurable_set.compl h_meas_s),
rw [restrict_apply h_meas_inter_compl, h_inter_inter_eq_inter sᶜ],
have h_mu_le_add_top : μ ≤ ν' + ν + ⊤,
{ rw add_comm,
have h_le_top : μ ≤ ⊤ := le_top,
apply (λ t₂ h_meas, le_add_right (h_le_top t₂ h_meas)) },
apply h_mu_le_add_top _ h_meas_inter_compl } },
{ ext1 t h_meas_t,
simp [restrict_apply h_meas_t,
restrict_apply (measurable_set.inter h_meas_t h_meas_s),
set.inter_assoc] } },
{ apply restrict_le_self } },
{ apply h_Inf_le_Inf,
intros s h_s_in, cases h_s_in with t h_t, cases h_t with h_t_in h_t_eq, subst s,
apply exists.intro (t.restrict s), split,
{ rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, ← restrict_add],
apply restrict_mono (set.subset.refl _) h_t_in },
{ apply le_refl _ } },
end
lemma restrict_apply_self {α : Type*} [measurable_space α]
(μ : measure α) {s : set α} (h_meas_s : measurable_set s) :
(μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
begin
rw [restrict_apply h_meas_s, set.inter_self],
end
lemma sub_apply_eq_zero_of_restrict_le_restrict {Ω:Type*} [measurable_space Ω]
(μ ν:measure_theory.measure Ω) (s:set Ω)
(h_le : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s) (h_meas_s : measurable_set s) :
(μ - ν) s = 0 :=
begin
rw [← restrict_apply_self _ h_meas_s, restrict_sub_eq_restrict_sub_restrict,
sub_eq_zero_of_le],
repeat {simp [*]},
end
end measure
end measure_theory
def measure_theory.finite_measure_of_le {Ω:Type*} [M:measurable_space Ω]
(μ ν : measure_theory.measure Ω) [measure_theory.finite_measure ν] (H:μ ≤ ν):
measure_theory.finite_measure μ :=
begin
apply measure_theory.finite_measure.mk (lt_of_le_of_lt (H set.univ measurable_set.univ) _),
apply measure_theory.measure_lt_top ν,
end
def measure_theory.finite_measure_restrict {Ω:Type*} [M:measurable_space Ω]
(μ:measure_theory.measure Ω) [measure_theory.finite_measure μ] (S:set Ω):
measure_theory.finite_measure (μ.restrict S) :=
begin
have A1:= @measure_theory.measure.restrict_le_self Ω M μ S,
apply measure_theory.finite_measure_of_le (μ.restrict S) μ A1,
end
--This works with EITHER ν or μ being finite, or even ν S < ⊤.
lemma jordan_decomposition_junior_apply {Ω:Type*} [measurable_space Ω]
(μ ν:measure_theory.measure Ω) (S:set Ω) [AX:measure_theory.finite_measure ν]:
(ν.restrict S ≤ μ.restrict S) → (measurable_set S) →
(μ - ν) S = μ S - ν S :=
begin
intros A1 B1,
rw ← measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_self _ B1,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_sub_eq_restrict_sub_restrict _ _,
rw @measure_theory.measure.sub_apply Ω _ _ _ S (measure_theory.finite_measure_restrict ν S) B1 A1,
repeat {rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_self},
repeat {exact B1},
end
lemma measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_subset {α : Type*} [measurable_space α]
(μ : measure_theory.measure α) {S T : set α} (h₁ : measurable_set S)
(h₂ : S ⊆ T) : (μ.restrict T) S = μ S :=
begin
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply h₁,
simp [set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left, h₂],
end
lemma le_of_subset_of_restrict_le_restrict {α:Type*} [measurable_space α]
{μ ν:measure_theory.measure α} {S T:set α}:
T ⊆ S →
(μ.restrict S) ≤ ν.restrict S →
measurable_set S →
measurable_set T → μ T ≤ ν T :=
begin
intros A3 A2 A1 A4,
rw measure_theory.measure.le_iff at A2,
have B3 := A2 T A4,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_subset μ A4 A3 at B3,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply_subset ν A4 A3 at B3,
apply B3,
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_of_restrict_le_restrict_of_subset {α:Type*} [measurable_space α]
{μ ν:measure_theory.measure α} {X Y:set α}:
μ.restrict X ≤ ν.restrict X →
Y ⊆ X →
measurable_set X →
measurable_set Y →
μ.restrict Y ≤ ν.restrict Y :=
begin
intros A1 A2 A3 A4,
rw measure_theory.measure.le_iff,
intros S A5,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply,
have A6:S ∩ Y ⊆ X,
{apply set.subset.trans _ A2, simp},
apply le_of_subset_of_restrict_le_restrict A6 A1 A3,
repeat {simp [measurable_set.inter,*]},
end
/--
A jordan decomposition of subtraction.
-/
lemma jordan_decomposition_nonneg_sub {Ω:Type*} [M:measurable_space Ω]
(μ ν:measure_theory.measure Ω) (S T:set Ω) [A1:measure_theory.finite_measure μ]:
measurable_set T → measurable_set S → μ.restrict S ≤ ν.restrict S →
ν.restrict Sᶜ ≤ μ.restrict Sᶜ →
(ν - μ) T = ν (T ∩ S) - μ (T ∩ S) :=
begin
intros A3 A2 A5 A6,
rw ← measure_theory.measure.inter_add_inter_compl (ν - μ) _ _ A3 A2,
rw jordan_decomposition_junior_apply ν μ (T ∩ S),
rw measure_theory.measure.sub_apply_eq_zero_of_restrict_le_restrict ν μ (T ∩ Sᶜ),
rw add_zero,
apply @restrict_le_restrict_of_restrict_le_restrict_of_subset Ω M ν μ Sᶜ (T ∩ Sᶜ) A6,
repeat {simp [A2, A3]},
apply @restrict_le_restrict_of_restrict_le_restrict_of_subset Ω M μ ν S (T ∩ S) A5,
repeat {simp [A2, A3]},
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_of_le_subset {α:Type*} [measurable_space α]
{μ ν:measure_theory.measure α} {S:set α} (H:measurable_set S):
(∀ T:set α, T ⊆ S → measurable_set T → μ T ≤ ν T) →
(μ.restrict S) ≤ ν.restrict S :=
begin
intros A1,
rw measure_theory.measure.le_iff,
intros s A2,
repeat {rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply A2},
apply A1,
{simp},
{simp [measurable_set.inter,H,A2]},
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_union {α:Type*} [measurable_space α]
{μ ν:measure_theory.measure α} {X Y:set α}:
μ.restrict X ≤ ν.restrict X →
μ.restrict Y ≤ ν.restrict Y →
measurable_set X →
measurable_set Y →
μ.restrict (X ∪ Y) ≤ ν.restrict (X ∪ Y) :=
begin
intros A1 A2 A3 A4,
have A6:X ∪ (Y \ X) = X ∪ Y := set.union_diff_self,
rw ← A6,
have A7:disjoint X (Y \ X) := set.disjoint_diff,
repeat {rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_union},
apply measure_theory.measure.add_le_add A1 _,
apply restrict_le_restrict_of_restrict_le_restrict_of_subset A2,
apply set.diff_subset,
repeat {simp [set.disjoint_diff, measurable_set.inter, measurable_set.diff,*]},
end
lemma set.directed_has_subset_of_monotone {α:Type*} {f:ℕ → set α}:
monotone f → directed has_subset.subset f :=
begin
intros A1,
unfold directed,
intros x y,
apply exists.intro (max x y),
split,
{
rw ← set.le_eq_subset,
apply @A1 x (max x y),
apply le_max_left,
},
{
rw ← set.le_eq_subset,
apply @A1 y (max x y),
apply le_max_right,
},
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_m_Union {α:Type*} [measurable_space α]
(μ ν:measure_theory.measure α) {f:ℕ → set α}:
monotone f →
(∀ n:ℕ, measurable_set (f n)) →
(∀ n:ℕ, μ.restrict (f n) ≤ ν.restrict (f n)) →
(μ.restrict (set.Union f) ≤ ν.restrict (set.Union f)) :=
begin
intros A1 A2 A3 S A5,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_apply_eq_supr,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_Union_apply_eq_supr,
rw supr_le_iff,
intro i,
have B1:(μ.restrict (f i)) S ≤ (ν.restrict (f i)) S,
{apply A3, apply A5},
apply le_trans B1,
apply @le_supr ennreal _ _,
repeat {simp [set.directed_has_subset_of_monotone,*]},
end
lemma nnreal.add_sub_add_eq_sub_add_sub {a b c d:nnreal} : c ≤ a → d ≤ b →
a + b - (c + d) = (a - c) + (b - d) :=
begin
intros A1 A2,
have A3:c + d ≤ a + b,
{ apply add_le_add A1 A2 },
repeat {rw ← nnreal.eq_iff <|> rw nnreal.coe_sub <|> rw nnreal.coe_add},
repeat {assumption},
linarith,
end
lemma ennreal.add_sub_add_eq_sub_add_sub {a b c d:ennreal}:c < ⊤ → d < ⊤ →
c ≤ a → d ≤ b →
a + b - (c + d) = (a - c) + (b - d) :=
begin
cases c;cases b;cases a;cases d;
simp [ennreal.top_sub_coe, ennreal.none_eq_top, ennreal.some_eq_coe,
ennreal.add_top, ← ennreal.coe_add, ← ennreal.coe_sub],
apply nnreal.add_sub_add_eq_sub_add_sub,
end
lemma le_measurable_add {α:Type*} [M:measurable_space α]
(μ ν:measure_theory.measure α) {X Y:set α}:
μ X < ⊤ →
μ Y < ⊤ →
measurable_set X →
measurable_set Y →
μ X ≤ ν X →
μ Y ≤ ν Y →
disjoint X Y →
ν (X ∪ Y) - μ (X ∪ Y) = (ν X - μ X) + (ν Y - μ Y) :=
begin
intros A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7,
repeat {rw measure_theory.measure_union A7 A3 A4},
rw ennreal.add_sub_add_eq_sub_add_sub A1 A2 A5 A6,
end
lemma measure_theory.measure.le_of_restrict_le_restrict_self {α:Type*} [measurable_space α]
(μ ν:measure_theory.measure α) {S:set α} (H:measurable_set S):
(μ.restrict S) ≤ ν.restrict S → μ S ≤ ν S :=
begin
intro A1,
apply le_of_subset_of_restrict_le_restrict (set.subset.refl S) A1 H H,
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_add {α:Type*} [M:measurable_space α]
(μ ν:measure_theory.measure α) {X Y:set α}:
μ X < ⊤ →
μ Y < ⊤ →
measurable_set X →
measurable_set Y →
μ.restrict X ≤ ν.restrict X →
μ.restrict Y ≤ ν.restrict Y →
disjoint X Y →
ν (X ∪ Y) - μ (X ∪ Y) = (ν X - μ X) + (ν Y - μ Y) :=
begin
intros A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7,
apply le_measurable_add μ ν A1 A2 A3 A4
(measure_theory.measure.le_of_restrict_le_restrict_self _ _ A3 A5)
(measure_theory.measure.le_of_restrict_le_restrict_self _ _ A4 A6) A7,
end
|
dfe13acd4595a758fcc6798a0ee4ed4ae176dfad | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/tactic/lint/type_classes.lean | c8a778dacc12f76394c67b3ba6a36666328e3c07 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,325 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Robert Y. Lewis, Gabriel Ebner
-/
import data.bool.basic
import meta.rb_map
import tactic.lint.basic
/-!
# Linters about type classes
This file defines several linters checking the correct usage of type classes
and the appropriate definition of instances:
* `instance_priority` ensures that blanket instances have low priority.
* `has_inhabited_instances` checks that every type has an `inhabited` instance.
* `impossible_instance` checks that there are no instances which can never apply.
* `incorrect_type_class_argument` checks that only type classes are used in
instance-implicit arguments.
* `dangerous_instance` checks for instances that generate subproblems with metavariables.
* `fails_quickly` checks that type class resolution finishes quickly.
* `class_structure` checks that every `class` is a structure, i.e. `@[class] def` is forbidden.
* `has_coe_variable` checks that there is no instance of type `has_coe α t`.
* `inhabited_nonempty` checks whether `[inhabited α]` arguments could be generalized
to `[nonempty α]`.
* `decidable_classical` checks propositions for `[decidable_... p]` hypotheses that are not used
in the statement, and could thus be removed by using `classical` in the proof.
* `linter.has_coe_to_fun` checks whether necessary `has_coe_to_fun` instances are declared.
* `linter.check_reducibility` checks whether non-instances with a class as type are reducible.
-/
open tactic
/-- Pretty prints a list of arguments of a declaration. Assumes `l` is a list of argument positions
and binders (or any other element that can be pretty printed).
`l` can be obtained e.g. by applying `list.indexes_values` to a list obtained by
`get_pi_binders`. -/
meta def print_arguments {α} [has_to_tactic_format α] (l : list (ℕ × α)) : tactic string := do
fs ← l.mmap (λ ⟨n, b⟩, (λ s, to_fmt "argument " ++ to_fmt (n+1) ++ ": " ++ s) <$> pp b),
return $ fs.to_string_aux tt
/-- checks whether an instance that always applies has priority ≥ 1000. -/
private meta def instance_priority (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := do
let nm := d.to_name,
b ← is_instance nm,
/- return `none` if `d` is not an instance -/
if ¬ b then return none else do
(is_persistent, prio) ← has_attribute `instance nm,
/- return `none` if `d` is has low priority -/
if prio < 1000 then return none else do
(_, tp) ← open_pis d.type,
tp ← whnf tp transparency.none,
let (fn, args) := tp.get_app_fn_args,
cls ← get_decl fn.const_name,
let (pi_args, _) := cls.type.pi_binders,
guard (args.length = pi_args.length),
/- List all the arguments of the class that block type-class inference from firing
(if they are metavariables). These are all the arguments except instance-arguments and
out-params. -/
let relevant_args := (args.zip pi_args).filter_map $ λ⟨e, ⟨_, info, tp⟩⟩,
if info = binder_info.inst_implicit ∨ tp.get_app_fn.is_constant_of `out_param
then none else some e,
let always_applies := relevant_args.all expr.is_local_constant ∧ relevant_args.nodup,
if always_applies then return $ some "set priority below 1000" else return none
/--
There are places where typeclass arguments are specified with implicit `{}` brackets instead of
the usual `[]` brackets. This is done when the instances can be inferred because they are implicit
arguments to the type of one of the other arguments. When they can be inferred from these other
arguments, it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
For example, when writing lemmas about `(f : α →+* β)`, it is faster to specify the fact that `α`
and `β` are `semiring`s as `{rα : semiring α} {rβ : semiring β}` rather than the usual
`[semiring α] [semiring β]`.
-/
library_note "implicit instance arguments"
/--
Certain instances always apply during type-class resolution. For example, the instance
`add_comm_group.to_add_group {α} [add_comm_group α] : add_group α` applies to all type-class
resolution problems of the form `add_group _`, and type-class inference will then do an
exhaustive search to find a commutative group. These instances take a long time to fail.
Other instances will only apply if the goal has a certain shape. For example
`int.add_group : add_group ℤ` or
`add_group.prod {α β} [add_group α] [add_group β] : add_group (α × β)`. Usually these instances
will fail quickly, and when they apply, they are almost the desired instance.
For this reason, we want the instances of the second type (that only apply in specific cases) to
always have higher priority than the instances of the first type (that always apply).
See also #1561.
Therefore, if we create an instance that always applies, we set the priority of these instances to
100 (or something similar, which is below the default value of 1000).
-/
library_note "lower instance priority"
/-- A linter object for checking instance priorities of instances that always apply.
This is in the default linter set. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.instance_priority : linter :=
{ test := instance_priority,
no_errors_found := "All instance priorities are good.",
errors_found := "DANGEROUS INSTANCE PRIORITIES.
The following instances always apply, and therefore should have a priority < 1000.
If you don't know what priority to choose, use priority 100.
See note [lower instance priority] for instructions to change the priority.",
auto_decls := tt }
/-- Reports declarations of types that do not have an associated `inhabited` instance. -/
private meta def has_inhabited_instance (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := do
tt ← pure d.is_trusted | pure none,
ff ← has_attribute' `reducible d.to_name | pure none,
ff ← has_attribute' `class d.to_name | pure none,
(_, ty) ← open_pis d.type,
ty ← whnf ty,
if ty = `(Prop) then pure none else do
`(Sort _) ← whnf ty | pure none,
insts ← attribute.get_instances `instance,
insts_tys ← insts.mmap $ λ i, expr.pi_codomain <$> declaration.type <$> get_decl i,
let inhabited_insts := insts_tys.filter (λ i,
i.app_fn.const_name = ``inhabited ∨ i.app_fn.const_name = `unique),
let inhabited_tys := inhabited_insts.map (λ i, i.app_arg.get_app_fn.const_name),
if d.to_name ∈ inhabited_tys then
pure none
else
pure "inhabited instance missing"
/-- A linter for missing `inhabited` instances. -/
@[linter]
meta def linter.has_inhabited_instance : linter :=
{ test := has_inhabited_instance,
auto_decls := ff,
no_errors_found := "No types have missing inhabited instances.",
errors_found := "TYPES ARE MISSING INHABITED INSTANCES:",
is_fast := ff }
attribute [nolint has_inhabited_instance] pempty
/-- Checks whether an instance can never be applied. -/
private meta def impossible_instance (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := do
tt ← is_instance d.to_name | return none,
(binders, _) ← get_pi_binders_nondep d.type,
let bad_arguments := binders.filter $ λ nb, nb.2.info ≠ binder_info.inst_implicit,
_ :: _ ← return bad_arguments | return none,
(λ s, some $ "Impossible to infer " ++ s) <$> print_arguments bad_arguments
/-- A linter object for `impossible_instance`. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.impossible_instance : linter :=
{ test := impossible_instance,
auto_decls := tt,
no_errors_found := "All instances are applicable.",
errors_found := "IMPOSSIBLE INSTANCES FOUND.
These instances have an argument that cannot be found during type-class resolution, and " ++
"therefore can never succeed. Either mark the arguments with square brackets (if it is a " ++
"class), or don't make it an instance." }
/-- Checks whether an instance can never be applied. -/
private meta def incorrect_type_class_argument (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := do
(binders, _) ← get_pi_binders d.type,
let instance_arguments := binders.indexes_values $
λ b : binder, b.info = binder_info.inst_implicit,
/- the head of the type should either unfold to a class, or be a local constant.
A local constant is allowed, because that could be a class when applied to the
proper arguments. -/
bad_arguments ← instance_arguments.mfilter (λ ⟨_, b⟩, do
(_, head) ← open_pis b.type,
if head.get_app_fn.is_local_constant then return ff else do
bnot <$> is_class head),
_ :: _ ← return bad_arguments | return none,
(λ s, some $ "These are not classes. " ++ s) <$> print_arguments bad_arguments
/-- A linter object for `incorrect_type_class_argument`. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.incorrect_type_class_argument : linter :=
{ test := incorrect_type_class_argument,
auto_decls := tt,
no_errors_found := "All declarations have correct type-class arguments.",
errors_found := "INCORRECT TYPE-CLASS ARGUMENTS.
Some declarations have non-classes between [square brackets]:" }
/-- Checks whether an instance is dangerous: it creates a new type-class problem with metavariable
arguments. -/
private meta def dangerous_instance (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := do
tt ← is_instance d.to_name | return none,
(local_constants, target) ← open_pis d.type,
let instance_arguments := local_constants.indexes_values $
λ e : expr, e.local_binding_info = binder_info.inst_implicit,
let bad_arguments := local_constants.indexes_values $ λ x,
!target.has_local_constant x &&
(x.local_binding_info ≠ binder_info.inst_implicit) &&
instance_arguments.any (λ nb, nb.2.local_type.has_local_constant x),
let bad_arguments : list (ℕ × binder) := bad_arguments.map $ λ ⟨n, e⟩, ⟨n, e.to_binder⟩,
_ :: _ ← return bad_arguments | return none,
(λ s, some $ "The following arguments become metavariables. " ++ s) <$>
print_arguments bad_arguments
/-- A linter object for `dangerous_instance`. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.dangerous_instance : linter :=
{ test := dangerous_instance,
no_errors_found := "No dangerous instances.",
errors_found := "DANGEROUS INSTANCES FOUND.\nThese instances are recursive, and create a new " ++
"type-class problem which will have metavariables.
Possible solution: remove the instance attribute or make it a local instance instead.
Currently this linter does not check whether the metavariables only occur in arguments marked " ++
"with `out_param`, in which case this linter gives a false positive.",
auto_decls := tt }
/-- Auxilliary definition for `find_nondep` -/
meta def find_nondep_aux : list expr → expr_set → tactic expr_set
| [] r := return r
| (h::hs) r :=
do type ← infer_type h,
find_nondep_aux hs $ r.union type.list_local_consts'
/-- Finds all hypotheses that don't occur in the target or other hypotheses. -/
meta def find_nondep : tactic (list expr) := do
ctx ← local_context,
tgt ← target,
lconsts ← find_nondep_aux ctx tgt.list_local_consts',
return $ ctx.filter $ λ e, !lconsts.contains e
/--
Tests whether type-class inference search will end quickly on certain unsolvable
type-class problems. This is to detect loops or very slow searches, which are problematic
(recall that normal type-class search often creates unsolvable subproblems, which have to fail
quickly for type-class inference to perform well.
We create these type-class problems by taking an instance, and removing the last hypothesis that
doesn't appear in the goal (or a later hypothesis). Note: this argument is necessarily an
instance-implicit argument if it passes the `linter.incorrect_type_class_argument`.
This tactic succeeds if `mk_instance` succeeds quickly or fails quickly with the error
message that it cannot find an instance. It fails if the tactic takes too long, or if any other
error message is raised (usually a maximum depth in the search).
-/
meta def fails_quickly (max_steps : ℕ) (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := retrieve $ do
tt ← is_instance d.to_name | return none,
let e := d.type,
g ← mk_meta_var e,
set_goals [g],
intros,
l@(_::_) ← find_nondep | return none, -- if all arguments occur in the goal, this instance is ok
clear l.ilast,
reset_instance_cache,
state ← read,
let state_msg := "\nState:\n" ++ to_string state,
tgt ← target >>= instantiate_mvars,
sum.inr msg ← retrieve_or_report_error $ tactic.try_for max_steps $ mk_instance tgt |
return none, /- it's ok if type-class inference can find an instance with fewer hypotheses.
This happens a lot for `has_sizeof` and `has_well_founded`, but can also happen if there is a
noncomputable instance with fewer assumptions. -/
return $ if "tactic.mk_instance failed to generate instance for".is_prefix_of msg then none else
some $ (++ state_msg) $
if msg = "try_for tactic failed, timeout" then "type-class inference timed out" else msg
/--
A linter object for `fails_quickly`.
We currently set the number of steps in the type-class search pretty high.
Some instances take quite some time to fail, and we seem to run against the caching issue in
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/odd.20repeated.20type.20class.20search
-/
@[linter] meta def linter.fails_quickly : linter :=
{ test := fails_quickly 15000,
auto_decls := tt,
no_errors_found := "No type-class searches timed out.",
errors_found := "TYPE CLASS SEARCHES TIMED OUT.
The following instances are part of a loop, or an excessively long search.
It is common that the loop occurs in a different class than the one flagged below,
but usually an instance that is part of the loop is also flagged.
To debug:
(1) run `scripts/mk_all.sh` and create a file with `import all` and
`set_option trace.class_instances true`
(2) Recreate the state shown in the error message. You can do this easily by copying the type of
the instance (the output of `#check @my_instance`), turning this into an example and removing the
last argument in square brackets. Prove the example using `by apply_instance`.
For example, if `additive.topological_add_group` raises an error, run
```
example {G : Type*} [topological_space G] [group G] : topological_add_group (additive G) :=
by apply_instance
```
(3) What error do you get?
(3a) If the error is \"tactic.mk_instance failed to generate instance\",
there might be nothing wrong. But it might take unreasonably long for the type-class inference to
fail. Check the trace to see if type-class inference takes any unnecessary long unexpected turns.
If not, feel free to increase the value in the definition of the linter `fails_quickly`.
(3b) If the error is \"maximum class-instance resolution depth has been reached\" there is almost
certainly a loop in the type-class inference. Find which instance causes the type-class inference to
go astray, and fix that instance.",
is_fast := ff }
/-- Checks that all uses of the `@[class]` attribute apply to structures or inductive types.
This is future-proofing for lean 4, which no longer supports `@[class] def`. -/
private meta def class_structure (n : name) : tactic (option string) := do
is_class ← has_attribute' `class n,
if is_class then do
env ← get_env,
pure $ if env.is_inductive n then none else
"is a non-structure or inductive type marked @[class]"
else pure none
/-- A linter object for `class_structure`. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.class_structure : linter :=
{ test := λ d, class_structure d.to_name,
auto_decls := tt,
no_errors_found := "All classes are structures.",
errors_found := "USE OF @[class] def IS DISALLOWED:" }
/--
Tests whether there is no instance of type `has_coe α t` where `α` is a variable,
or `has_coe t α` where `α` does not occur in `t`.
See note [use has_coe_t].
-/
private meta def has_coe_variable (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := do
tt ← is_instance d.to_name | return none,
`(has_coe %%a %%b) ← return d.type.pi_codomain | return none,
if a.is_var then
return $ some $ "illegal instance, first argument is variable"
else if b.is_var ∧ ¬ b.occurs a then
return $ some $ "illegal instance, second argument is variable not occurring in first argument"
else
return none
/-- A linter object for `has_coe_variable`. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.has_coe_variable : linter :=
{ test := has_coe_variable,
auto_decls := tt,
no_errors_found := "No invalid `has_coe` instances.",
errors_found := "INVALID `has_coe` INSTANCES.
Make the following declarations instances of the class `has_coe_t` instead of `has_coe`." }
/-- Checks whether a declaration is prop-valued and takes an `inhabited _` argument that is unused
elsewhere in the type. In this case, that argument can be replaced with `nonempty _`. -/
private meta def inhabited_nonempty (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) :=
do tt ← is_prop d.type | return none,
(binders, _) ← get_pi_binders_nondep d.type,
let inhd_binders := binders.filter $ λ pr, pr.2.type.is_app_of `inhabited,
if inhd_binders.length = 0 then return none
else (λ s, some $ "The following `inhabited` instances should be `nonempty`. " ++ s) <$>
print_arguments inhd_binders
/-- A linter object for `inhabited_nonempty`. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.inhabited_nonempty : linter :=
{ test := inhabited_nonempty,
auto_decls := ff,
no_errors_found := "No uses of `inhabited` arguments should be replaced with `nonempty`.",
errors_found := "USES OF `inhabited` SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH `nonempty`." }
/-- Checks whether a declaration is `Prop`-valued and takes a `decidable* _`
hypothesis that is unused lsewhere in the type.
In this case, that hypothesis can be replaced with `classical` in the proof.
Theorems in the `decidable` namespace are exempt from the check. -/
private meta def decidable_classical (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) :=
do tt ← is_prop d.type | return none,
ff ← pure $ (`decidable).is_prefix_of d.to_name | return none,
(binders, _) ← get_pi_binders_nondep d.type,
let deceq_binders := binders.filter $ λ pr, pr.2.type.is_app_of `decidable_eq
∨ pr.2.type.is_app_of `decidable_pred ∨ pr.2.type.is_app_of `decidable_rel
∨ pr.2.type.is_app_of `decidable,
if deceq_binders.length = 0 then return none
else (λ s, some $ "The following `decidable` hypotheses should be replaced with
`classical` in the proof. " ++ s) <$>
print_arguments deceq_binders
/-- A linter object for `decidable_classical`. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.decidable_classical : linter :=
{ test := decidable_classical,
auto_decls := ff,
no_errors_found := "No uses of `decidable` arguments should be replaced with `classical`.",
errors_found := "USES OF `decidable` SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH `classical` IN THE PROOF." }
/- The file `logic/basic.lean` emphasizes the differences between what holds under classical
and non-classical logic. It makes little sense to make all these lemmas classical, so we add them
to the list of lemmas which are not checked by the linter `decidable_classical`. -/
attribute [nolint decidable_classical] dec_em dec_em' not.decidable_imp_symm
private meta def has_coe_to_fun_linter (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) :=
retrieve $ do
tt ← return d.is_trusted | pure none,
mk_meta_var d.type >>= set_goals ∘ pure,
args ← unfreezing intros,
expr.sort _ ← target | pure none,
let ty : expr := (expr.const d.to_name d.univ_levels).mk_app args,
some coe_fn_inst ←
try_core $ to_expr ``(_root_.has_coe_to_fun %%ty _) >>= mk_instance | pure none,
set_bool_option `pp.all true,
some trans_inst@(expr.app (expr.app _ trans_inst_1) trans_inst_2) ←
try_core $ to_expr ``(@_root_.coe_fn_trans %%ty _ _ _ _) | pure none,
tt ← succeeds $ unify trans_inst coe_fn_inst transparency.reducible | pure none,
set_bool_option `pp.all true,
trans_inst_1 ← pp trans_inst_1,
trans_inst_2 ← pp trans_inst_2,
pure $ format.to_string $
"`has_coe_to_fun` instance is definitionally equal to a transitive instance composed of: " ++
trans_inst_1.group.indent 2 ++
format.line ++ "and" ++
trans_inst_2.group.indent 2
/-- Linter that checks whether `has_coe_to_fun` instances comply with Note [function coercion]. -/
@[linter] meta def linter.has_coe_to_fun : linter :=
{ test := has_coe_to_fun_linter,
auto_decls := tt,
no_errors_found := "has_coe_to_fun is used correctly",
errors_found := "INVALID/MISSING `has_coe_to_fun` instances.
You should add a `has_coe_to_fun` instance for the following types.
See Note [function coercion]." }
/--
Checks whether an instance contains a semireducible non-instance with a class as
type in its value. We add some restrictions to get not too many false positives:
* We only consider classes with an `add` or `mul` field, since those classes are most likely to
occur as a field to another class, and be an extension of another class.
* We only consider instances of type-valued classes and non-instances that are definitions.
* We currently ignore declarations `foo` that have a `foo._main` declaration. We could look inside,
or at the generated equation lemmas, but it's unlikely that there are many problematic instances
defined using the equation compiler.
-/
meta def check_reducible_non_instances (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) := do
tt ← is_instance d.to_name | return none,
ff ← is_prop d.type | return none,
env ← get_env,
-- We only check if the class of the instance contains an `add` or a `mul` field.
let cls := d.type.pi_codomain.get_app_fn.const_name,
some constrs ← return $ env.structure_fields cls | return none,
tt ← return $ constrs.mem `add || constrs.mem `mul | return none,
l ← d.value.list_constant.mfilter $ λ nm, do
{ d ← env.get nm,
ff ← is_instance nm | return ff,
tt ← is_class d.type | return ff,
tt ← return d.is_definition | return ff,
-- We only check if the class of the non-instance contains an `add` or a `mul` field.
let cls := d.type.pi_codomain.get_app_fn.const_name,
some constrs ← return $ env.structure_fields cls | return ff,
tt ← return $ constrs.mem `add || constrs.mem `mul | return ff,
ff ← has_attribute' `reducible nm | return ff,
return tt },
if l.empty then return none else
-- we currently ignore declarations that have a `foo._main` declaration.
if l.to_list = [d.to_name ++ `_main] then return none else
return $ some $ "This instance contains the declarations " ++ to_string l.to_list ++
", which are semireducible non-instances."
/-- A linter that checks whether an instance contains a semireducible non-instance. -/
@[linter]
meta def linter.check_reducibility : linter :=
{ test := check_reducible_non_instances,
auto_decls := ff,
no_errors_found :=
"All non-instances are reducible.",
errors_found := "THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES MIGHT NOT REDUCE.
These instances contain one or more declarations that are not instances and are also not marked
`@[reducible]`. This means that type-class inference cannot unfold these declarations, " ++
"which might mean that type-class inference cannot infer that two instances are definitionally " ++
"equal. This can cause unexpected errors when this class occurs " ++
"as an *argument* to a type-class problem. See note [reducible non-instances].",
is_fast := tt }
|
ed2b2ebfe726fcb784c97aaf086ea97d9cb24392 | 88fb7558b0636ec6b181f2a548ac11ad3919f8a5 | /library/init/meta/quote.lean | 78e9bbce5bd6450d78b152bf467a29f72c7732c7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | moritayasuaki/lean | 9f666c323cb6fa1f31ac597d777914aed41e3b7a | ae96ebf6ee953088c235ff7ae0e8c95066ba8001 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,135,440,814 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 90,269,903 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,493,906,291,000 | 1,493,906,291,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,815 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic
open tactic
meta class has_quote (α : Type) :=
(quote : α → pexpr)
@[inline] meta def quote {α : Type} [has_quote α] : α → pexpr :=
has_quote.quote
meta instance : has_quote bool :=
⟨λ b, if b then ``(true) else ``(false)⟩
meta instance : has_quote nat := ⟨pexpr.mk_prenum_macro⟩
@[priority std.priority.default + 1]
meta instance : has_quote string := ⟨pexpr.mk_string_macro⟩
meta instance : has_quote pexpr := ⟨pexpr.mk_quote_macro⟩
meta instance : has_quote char :=
⟨λ ⟨n, pr⟩, ``(char.of_nat %%(quote n))⟩
meta instance : has_quote unsigned :=
⟨λ ⟨n, pr⟩, ``(unsigned.of_nat' %%(quote n))⟩
meta instance : has_quote pos :=
⟨λ ⟨l, c⟩, ``(pos.mk %%(quote l) %%(quote c))⟩
meta def name.quote : name → pexpr
| name.anonymous := ``(name.anonymous)
| (name.mk_string s n) := ``(name.mk_string %%(quote s) %%(name.quote n))
| (name.mk_numeral i n) := ``(name.mk_numeral %%(quote i) %%(name.quote n))
meta instance : has_quote name := ⟨name.quote⟩
private meta def list.quote {α : Type} [has_quote α] : list α → pexpr
| [] := ``([])
| (h::t) := ``(%%(quote h) :: %%(list.quote t))
meta instance {α : Type} [has_quote α] : has_quote (list α) := ⟨list.quote⟩
meta instance {α : Type} [has_quote α] : has_quote (option α) :=
⟨λ opt, match opt with
| some x := ``(option.some %%(quote x))
| none := ``(option.none)
end⟩
meta instance : has_quote unit := ⟨λ _, ``(unit.star)⟩
meta instance {α β : Type} [has_quote α] [has_quote β] : has_quote (α × β) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, y⟩, ``((%%(quote x), %%(quote y)))⟩
|
a7bb0f727b04eb1170eb0b4989ab3e97ccb46b4c | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/topology/order.lean | d1a1c89e6b25dc29942735ca9a6c73820a3eed3a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,737 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import topology.tactic
/-!
# Ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies
Topologies on a fixed type `α` are ordered, by reverse inclusion.
That is, for topologies `t₁` and `t₂` on `α`, we write `t₁ ≤ t₂`
if every set open in `t₂` is also open in `t₁`.
(One also calls `t₁` finer than `t₂`, and `t₂` coarser than `t₁`.)
Any function `f : α → β` induces
`induced f : topological_space β → topological_space α`
and `coinduced f : topological_space α → topological_space β`.
Continuity, the ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies are
related as follows:
* The identity map (α, t₁) → (α, t₂) is continuous iff t₁ ≤ t₂.
* A map f : (α, t) → (β, u) is continuous
iff t ≤ induced f u (`continuous_iff_le_induced`)
iff coinduced f t ≤ u (`continuous_iff_coinduced_le`).
Topologies on α form a complete lattice, with ⊥ the discrete topology
and ⊤ the indiscrete topology.
For a function f : α → β, (coinduced f, induced f) is a Galois connection
between topologies on α and topologies on β.
## Implementation notes
There is a Galois insertion between topologies on α (with the inclusion ordering)
and all collections of sets in α. The complete lattice structure on topologies
on α is defined as the reverse of the one obtained via this Galois insertion.
## Tags
finer, coarser, induced topology, coinduced topology
-/
open set filter classical
open_locale classical topological_space filter
universes u v w
namespace topological_space
variables {α : Type u}
/-- The open sets of the least topology containing a collection of basic sets. -/
inductive generate_open (g : set (set α)) : set α → Prop
| basic : ∀s∈g, generate_open s
| univ : generate_open univ
| inter : ∀s t, generate_open s → generate_open t → generate_open (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀k, (∀s∈k, generate_open s) → generate_open (⋃₀ k)
/-- The smallest topological space containing the collection `g` of basic sets -/
def generate_from (g : set (set α)) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := generate_open g,
is_open_univ := generate_open.univ,
is_open_inter := generate_open.inter,
is_open_sUnion := generate_open.sUnion }
lemma nhds_generate_from {g : set (set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generate_from g) a = (⨅s∈{s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g}, 𝓟 s) :=
by rw nhds_def; exact le_antisymm
(infi_le_infi $ assume s, infi_le_infi_const $ assume ⟨as, sg⟩, ⟨as, generate_open.basic _ sg⟩)
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume ⟨as, hs⟩,
begin
revert as, clear_, induction hs,
case generate_open.basic : s hs
{ exact assume as, infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le _ ⟨as, hs⟩ },
case generate_open.univ
{ rw [principal_univ],
exact assume _, le_top },
case generate_open.inter : s t hs' ht' hs ht
{ exact assume ⟨has, hat⟩, calc _ ≤ 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t : le_inf (hs has) (ht hat)
... = _ : inf_principal },
case generate_open.sUnion : k hk' hk
{ exact λ ⟨t, htk, hat⟩, calc _ ≤ 𝓟 t : hk t htk hat
... ≤ _ : le_principal_iff.2 $ subset_sUnion_of_mem htk }
end)
lemma tendsto_nhds_generate_from {β : Type*} {m : α → β} {f : filter α} {g : set (set β)} {b : β}
(h : ∀s∈g, b ∈ s → m ⁻¹' s ∈ f) : tendsto m f (@nhds β (generate_from g) b) :=
by rw [nhds_generate_from]; exact
(tendsto_infi.2 $ assume s, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume ⟨hbs, hsg⟩, tendsto_principal.2 $ h s hsg hbs)
/-- Construct a topology on α given the filter of neighborhoods of each point of α. -/
protected def mk_of_nhds (n : α → filter α) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, ∀a∈s, s ∈ n a,
is_open_univ := assume x h, univ_mem_sets,
is_open_inter := assume s t hs ht x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩, inter_mem_sets (hs x hxs) (ht x hxt),
is_open_sUnion := assume s hs a ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩,
mem_sets_of_superset (hs x hx _ hxa) (set.subset_sUnion_of_mem hx) }
lemma nhds_mk_of_nhds (n : α → filter α) (a : α)
(h₀ : pure ≤ n) (h₁ : ∀{a s}, s ∈ n a → ∃ t ∈ n a, t ⊆ s ∧ ∀a' ∈ t, s ∈ n a') :
@nhds α (topological_space.mk_of_nhds n) a = n a :=
begin
letI := topological_space.mk_of_nhds n,
refine le_antisymm (assume s hs, _) (assume s hs, _),
{ have h₀ : {b | s ∈ n b} ⊆ s := assume b hb, mem_pure_sets.1 $ h₀ b hb,
have h₁ : {b | s ∈ n b} ∈ 𝓝 a,
{ refine mem_nhds_sets (assume b (hb : s ∈ n b), _) hs,
rcases h₁ hb with ⟨t, ht, hts, h⟩,
exact mem_sets_of_superset ht h },
exact mem_sets_of_superset h₁ h₀ },
{ rcases (@mem_nhds_sets_iff α (topological_space.mk_of_nhds n) _ _).1 hs with ⟨t, hts, ht, hat⟩,
exact (n a).sets_of_superset (ht _ hat) hts },
end
end topological_space
section lattice
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- The inclusion ordering on topologies on α. We use it to get a complete
lattice instance via the Galois insertion method, but the partial order
that we will eventually impose on `topological_space α` is the reverse one. -/
def tmp_order : partial_order (topological_space α) :=
{ le := λt s, t.is_open ≤ s.is_open,
le_antisymm := assume t s h₁ h₂, topological_space_eq $ le_antisymm h₁ h₂,
le_refl := assume t, le_refl t.is_open,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, @le_trans _ _ a.is_open b.is_open c.is_open h₁ h₂ }
local attribute [instance] tmp_order
/- We'll later restate this lemma in terms of the correct order on `topological_space α`. -/
private lemma generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open {g : set (set α)} {t : topological_space α} :
topological_space.generate_from g ≤ t ↔ g ⊆ {s | t.is_open s} :=
iff.intro
(assume ht s hs, ht _ $ topological_space.generate_open.basic s hs)
(assume hg s hs, hs.rec_on (assume v hv, hg hv)
t.is_open_univ (assume u v _ _, t.is_open_inter u v) (assume k _, t.is_open_sUnion k))
/-- If `s` equals the collection of open sets in the topology it generates,
then `s` defines a topology. -/
protected def mk_of_closure (s : set (set α))
(hs : {u | (topological_space.generate_from s).is_open u} = s) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λu, u ∈ s,
is_open_univ := hs ▸ topological_space.generate_open.univ,
is_open_inter := hs ▸ topological_space.generate_open.inter,
is_open_sUnion := hs ▸ topological_space.generate_open.sUnion }
lemma mk_of_closure_sets {s : set (set α)}
{hs : {u | (topological_space.generate_from s).is_open u} = s} :
mk_of_closure s hs = topological_space.generate_from s :=
topological_space_eq hs.symm
/-- The Galois insertion between `set (set α)` and `topological_space α` whose lower part
sends a collection of subsets of α to the topology they generate, and whose upper part
sends a topology to its collection of open subsets. -/
def gi_generate_from (α : Type*) :
galois_insertion topological_space.generate_from (λt:topological_space α, {s | t.is_open s}) :=
{ gc := assume g t, generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open,
le_l_u := assume ts s hs, topological_space.generate_open.basic s hs,
choice := λg hg, mk_of_closure g
(subset.antisymm hg $ generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open.1 $ le_refl _),
choice_eq := assume s hs, mk_of_closure_sets }
lemma generate_from_mono {α} {g₁ g₂ : set (set α)} (h : g₁ ⊆ g₂) :
topological_space.generate_from g₁ ≤ topological_space.generate_from g₂ :=
(gi_generate_from _).gc.monotone_l h
/-- The complete lattice of topological spaces, but built on the inclusion ordering. -/
def tmp_complete_lattice {α : Type u} : complete_lattice (topological_space α) :=
(gi_generate_from α).lift_complete_lattice
/-- The ordering on topologies on the type `α`.
`t ≤ s` if every set open in `s` is also open in `t` (`t` is finer than `s`). -/
instance : partial_order (topological_space α) :=
{ le := λ t s, s.is_open ≤ t.is_open,
le_antisymm := assume t s h₁ h₂, topological_space_eq $ le_antisymm h₂ h₁,
le_refl := assume t, le_refl t.is_open,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, le_trans h₂ h₁ }
lemma le_generate_from_iff_subset_is_open {g : set (set α)} {t : topological_space α} :
t ≤ topological_space.generate_from g ↔ g ⊆ {s | t.is_open s} :=
generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open
/-- Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology
and `⊤` the indiscrete topology. The infimum of a collection of topologies
is the topology generated by all their open sets, while the supremem is the
topology whose open sets are those sets open in every member of the collection. -/
instance : complete_lattice (topological_space α) :=
@order_dual.complete_lattice _ tmp_complete_lattice
/-- A topological space is discrete if every set is open, that is,
its topology equals the discrete topology `⊥`. -/
class discrete_topology (α : Type*) [t : topological_space α] : Prop :=
(eq_bot [] : t = ⊥)
@[priority 100]
instance discrete_topology_bot (α : Type*) : @discrete_topology α ⊥ :=
{ eq_bot := rfl }
@[simp] lemma is_open_discrete [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] (s : set α) :
is_open s :=
(discrete_topology.eq_bot α).symm ▸ trivial
@[simp] lemma is_closed_discrete [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] (s : set α) :
is_closed s :=
(discrete_topology.eq_bot α).symm ▸ trivial
lemma continuous_of_discrete_topology [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α]
[topological_space β] {f : α → β} : continuous f :=
continuous_def.2 $ λs hs, is_open_discrete _
lemma nhds_bot (α : Type*) : (@nhds α ⊥) = pure :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (@pure_le_nhds α ⊥),
assume a s hs,
exact @mem_nhds_sets α ⊥ a s trivial hs
end
lemma nhds_discrete (α : Type*) [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] : (@nhds α _) = pure :=
(discrete_topology.eq_bot α).symm ▸ nhds_bot α
lemma le_of_nhds_le_nhds {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} (h : ∀x, @nhds α t₁ x ≤ @nhds α t₂ x) :
t₁ ≤ t₂ :=
assume s, show @is_open α t₂ s → @is_open α t₁ s,
by { simp only [is_open_iff_nhds, le_principal_iff], exact assume hs a ha, h _ $ hs _ ha }
lemma eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} (h : ∀x, @nhds α t₁ x = @nhds α t₂ x) :
t₁ = t₂ :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_nhds_le_nhds $ assume x, le_of_eq $ h x)
(le_of_nhds_le_nhds $ assume x, le_of_eq $ (h x).symm)
lemma eq_bot_of_singletons_open {t : topological_space α} (h : ∀ x, t.is_open {x}) : t = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ λ s hs, bUnion_of_singleton s ▸ is_open_bUnion (λ x _, h x)
lemma forall_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [topological_space X] :
(∀ s : set X, is_open s) ↔ discrete_topology X :=
⟨λ h, ⟨by { ext U , show is_open U ↔ true, simp [h U] }⟩, λ a, @is_open_discrete _ _ a⟩
lemma singletons_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [topological_space X] :
(∀ a : X, is_open ({a} : set X)) ↔ discrete_topology X :=
⟨λ h, ⟨eq_bot_of_singletons_open h⟩, λ a _, @is_open_discrete _ _ a _⟩
end lattice
section galois_connection
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a topology on `β`, the induced topology on `α` is the collection of
sets that are preimages of some open set in `β`. This is the coarsest topology that
makes `f` continuous. -/
def topological_space.induced {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (t : topological_space β) :
topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, ∃s', t.is_open s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s,
is_open_univ := ⟨univ, t.is_open_univ, preimage_univ⟩,
is_open_inter := by rintro s₁ s₂ ⟨s'₁, hs₁, rfl⟩ ⟨s'₂, hs₂, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨s'₁ ∩ s'₂, t.is_open_inter _ _ hs₁ hs₂, preimage_inter⟩,
is_open_sUnion := assume s h,
begin
simp only [classical.skolem] at h,
cases h with f hf,
apply exists.intro (⋃(x : set α) (h : x ∈ s), f x h),
simp only [sUnion_eq_bUnion, preimage_Union, (λx h, (hf x h).right)], refine ⟨_, rfl⟩,
exact (@is_open_Union β _ t _ $ assume i,
show is_open (⋃h, f i h), from @is_open_Union β _ t _ $ assume h, (hf i h).left)
end }
lemma is_open_induced_iff [t : topological_space β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} :
@is_open α (t.induced f) s ↔ (∃t, is_open t ∧ f ⁻¹' t = s) :=
iff.rfl
lemma is_closed_induced_iff [t : topological_space β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} :
@is_closed α (t.induced f) s ↔ (∃t, is_closed t ∧ f ⁻¹' t = s) :=
⟨assume ⟨t, ht, heq⟩, ⟨tᶜ, is_closed_compl_iff.2 ht,
by simp only [preimage_compl, heq, compl_compl]⟩,
assume ⟨t, ht, heq⟩, ⟨tᶜ, ht, by simp only [preimage_compl, heq.symm]⟩⟩
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a topology on `α`, the coinduced topology on `β` is defined
such that `s:set β` is open if the preimage of `s` is open. This is the finest topology that
makes `f` continuous. -/
def topological_space.coinduced {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (t : topological_space α) :
topological_space β :=
{ is_open := λs, t.is_open (f ⁻¹' s),
is_open_univ := by rw preimage_univ; exact t.is_open_univ,
is_open_inter := assume s₁ s₂ h₁ h₂, by rw preimage_inter; exact t.is_open_inter _ _ h₁ h₂,
is_open_sUnion := assume s h, by rw [preimage_sUnion]; exact (@is_open_Union _ _ t _ $ assume i,
show is_open (⋃ (H : i ∈ s), f ⁻¹' i), from
@is_open_Union _ _ t _ $ assume hi, h i hi) }
lemma is_open_coinduced {t : topological_space α} {s : set β} {f : α → β} :
@is_open β (topological_space.coinduced f t) s ↔ is_open (f ⁻¹' s) :=
iff.rfl
variables {t t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} {t' : topological_space β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
lemma continuous.coinduced_le (h : @continuous α β t t' f) :
t.coinduced f ≤ t' :=
λ s hs, (continuous_def.1 h s hs : _)
lemma coinduced_le_iff_le_induced {f : α → β} {tα : topological_space α}
{tβ : topological_space β} :
tα.coinduced f ≤ tβ ↔ tα ≤ tβ.induced f :=
iff.intro
(assume h s ⟨t, ht, hst⟩, hst ▸ h _ ht)
(assume h s hs, show tα.is_open (f ⁻¹' s), from h _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩)
lemma continuous.le_induced (h : @continuous α β t t' f) :
t ≤ t'.induced f :=
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 h.coinduced_le
lemma gc_coinduced_induced (f : α → β) :
galois_connection (topological_space.coinduced f) (topological_space.induced f) :=
assume f g, coinduced_le_iff_le_induced
lemma induced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.induced g ≤ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).monotone_u h
lemma coinduced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.coinduced f ≤ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).monotone_l h
@[simp] lemma induced_top : (⊤ : topological_space α).induced g = ⊤ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_top
@[simp] lemma induced_inf : (t₁ ⊓ t₂).induced g = t₁.induced g ⊓ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_inf
@[simp] lemma induced_infi {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → topological_space α} :
(⨅i, t i).induced g = (⨅i, (t i).induced g) :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_infi
@[simp] lemma coinduced_bot : (⊥ : topological_space α).coinduced f = ⊥ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_bot
@[simp] lemma coinduced_sup : (t₁ ⊔ t₂).coinduced f = t₁.coinduced f ⊔ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_sup
@[simp] lemma coinduced_supr {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → topological_space α} :
(⨆i, t i).coinduced f = (⨆i, (t i).coinduced f) :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_supr
lemma induced_id [t : topological_space α] : t.induced id = t :=
topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s, propext $
⟨assume ⟨s', hs, h⟩, h ▸ hs, assume hs, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩⟩
lemma induced_compose [tγ : topological_space γ]
{f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (tγ.induced g).induced f = tγ.induced (g ∘ f) :=
topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s, propext $
⟨assume ⟨s', ⟨s, hs, h₂⟩, h₁⟩, h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩,
assume ⟨s, hs, h⟩, ⟨preimage g s, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h ▸ rfl⟩⟩
lemma coinduced_id [t : topological_space α] : t.coinduced id = t :=
topological_space_eq rfl
lemma coinduced_compose [tα : topological_space α]
{f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (tα.coinduced f).coinduced g = tα.coinduced (g ∘ f) :=
topological_space_eq rfl
end galois_connection
/- constructions using the complete lattice structure -/
section constructions
open topological_space
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
instance inhabited_topological_space {α : Type u} : inhabited (topological_space α) :=
⟨⊤⟩
@[priority 100]
instance subsingleton.unique_topological_space [subsingleton α] :
unique (topological_space α) :=
{ default := ⊥,
uniq := λ t, eq_bot_of_singletons_open $ λ x, subsingleton.set_cases
(@is_open_empty _ t) (@is_open_univ _ t) ({x} : set α) }
@[priority 100]
instance subsingleton.discrete_topology [t : topological_space α] [subsingleton α] :
discrete_topology α :=
⟨unique.eq_default t⟩
instance : topological_space empty := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology empty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space pempty := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology pempty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space punit := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology punit := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space bool := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology bool := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space ℕ := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology ℕ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space ℤ := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology ℤ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance sierpinski_space : topological_space Prop :=
generate_from {{true}}
lemma le_generate_from {t : topological_space α} { g : set (set α) } (h : ∀s∈g, is_open s) :
t ≤ generate_from g :=
le_generate_from_iff_subset_is_open.2 h
lemma induced_generate_from_eq {α β} {b : set (set β)} {f : α → β} :
(generate_from b).induced f = topological_space.generate_from (preimage f '' b) :=
le_antisymm
(le_generate_from $ ball_image_iff.2 $ assume s hs, ⟨s, generate_open.basic _ hs, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 $ le_generate_from $ assume s hs,
generate_open.basic _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ hs)
/-- This construction is left adjoint to the operation sending a topology on `α`
to its neighborhood filter at a fixed point `a : α`. -/
protected def topological_space.nhds_adjoint (a : α) (f : filter α) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, a ∈ s → s ∈ f,
is_open_univ := assume s, univ_mem_sets,
is_open_inter := assume s t hs ht ⟨has, hat⟩, inter_mem_sets (hs has) (ht hat),
is_open_sUnion := assume k hk ⟨u, hu, hau⟩, mem_sets_of_superset (hk u hu hau)
(subset_sUnion_of_mem hu) }
lemma gc_nhds (a : α) :
galois_connection (topological_space.nhds_adjoint a) (λt, @nhds α t a) :=
assume f t, by { rw le_nhds_iff, exact ⟨λ H s hs has, H _ has hs, λ H s has hs, H _ hs has⟩ }
lemma nhds_mono {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} {a : α} (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) :
@nhds α t₁ a ≤ @nhds α t₂ a := (gc_nhds a).monotone_u h
lemma nhds_infi {ι : Sort*} {t : ι → topological_space α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (infi t) a = (⨅i, @nhds α (t i) a) := (gc_nhds a).u_infi
lemma nhds_Inf {s : set (topological_space α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (Inf s) a = (⨅t∈s, @nhds α t a) := (gc_nhds a).u_Inf
lemma nhds_inf {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (t₁ ⊓ t₂) a = @nhds α t₁ a ⊓ @nhds α t₂ a := (gc_nhds a).u_inf
lemma nhds_top {a : α} : @nhds α ⊤ a = ⊤ := (gc_nhds a).u_top
local notation `cont` := @continuous _ _
local notation `tspace` := topological_space
open topological_space
variables {γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {ι : Sort*}
lemma continuous_iff_coinduced_le {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₂ f ↔ coinduced f t₁ ≤ t₂ :=
continuous_def.trans iff.rfl
lemma continuous_iff_le_induced {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₂ f ↔ t₁ ≤ induced f t₂ :=
iff.trans continuous_iff_coinduced_le (gc_coinduced_induced f _ _)
theorem continuous_generated_from {t : tspace α} {b : set (set β)}
(h : ∀s∈b, is_open (f ⁻¹' s)) : cont t (generate_from b) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_generate_from h
lemma continuous_induced_dom {t : tspace β} : cont (induced f t) t f :=
by { rw continuous_def, assume s h, exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ }
lemma continuous_induced_rng {g : γ → α} {t₂ : tspace β} {t₁ : tspace γ}
(h : cont t₁ t₂ (f ∘ g)) : cont t₁ (induced f t₂) g :=
begin
rw continuous_def,
rintros s ⟨t, ht, s_eq⟩,
simpa [← s_eq] using continuous_def.1 h t ht,
end
lemma continuous_induced_rng' [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
{g : γ → α} (f : α → β) (H : ‹topological_space α› = ‹topological_space β›.induced f)
(h : continuous (f ∘ g)) : continuous g :=
H.symm ▸ continuous_induced_rng h
lemma continuous_coinduced_rng {t : tspace α} : cont t (coinduced f t) f :=
by { rw continuous_def, assume s h, exact h }
lemma continuous_coinduced_dom {g : β → γ} {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : tspace γ}
(h : cont t₁ t₂ (g ∘ f)) : cont (coinduced f t₁) t₂ g :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h ⊢,
assume s hs,
exact h _ hs
end
lemma continuous_le_dom {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) (h₂ : cont t₁ t₃ f) : cont t₂ t₃ f :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h₂ ⊢,
assume s h,
exact h₁ _ (h₂ s h)
end
lemma continuous_le_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) (h₂ : cont t₁ t₂ f) : cont t₁ t₃ f :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h₂ ⊢,
assume s h,
exact h₂ s (h₁ s h)
end
lemma continuous_sup_dom {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : cont t₁ t₃ f) (h₂ : cont t₂ t₃ f) : cont (t₁ ⊔ t₂) t₃ f :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
assume s h,
exact ⟨h₁ s h, h₂ s h⟩
end
lemma continuous_sup_rng_left {t₁ : tspace α} {t₃ t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₂ f → cont t₁ (t₂ ⊔ t₃) f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_left
lemma continuous_sup_rng_right {t₁ : tspace α} {t₃ t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₃ f → cont t₁ (t₂ ⊔ t₃) f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_right
lemma continuous_Sup_dom {t₁ : set (tspace α)} {t₂ : tspace β}
(h : ∀t∈t₁, cont t t₂ f) : cont (Sup t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 $ Sup_le $ assume t ht, continuous_iff_le_induced.1 $ h t ht
lemma continuous_Sup_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : set (tspace β)} {t : tspace β}
(h₁ : t ∈ t₂) (hf : cont t₁ t f) : cont t₁ (Sup t₂) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_Sup_of_le h₁ $ continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 hf
lemma continuous_supr_dom {t₁ : ι → tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β}
(h : ∀i, cont (t₁ i) t₂ f) : cont (supr t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_Sup_dom $ assume t ⟨i, (t_eq : t₁ i = t)⟩, t_eq ▸ h i
lemma continuous_supr_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : ι → tspace β} {i : ι}
(h : cont t₁ (t₂ i) f) : cont t₁ (supr t₂) f :=
continuous_Sup_rng ⟨i, rfl⟩ h
lemma continuous_inf_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : cont t₁ t₂ f) (h₂ : cont t₁ t₃ f) : cont t₁ (t₂ ⊓ t₃) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_inf
(continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 h₁)
(continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 h₂)
lemma continuous_inf_dom_left {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₃ f → cont (t₁ ⊓ t₂) t₃ f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_left
lemma continuous_inf_dom_right {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β} :
cont t₂ t₃ f → cont (t₁ ⊓ t₂) t₃ f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_right
lemma continuous_Inf_dom {t₁ : set (tspace α)} {t₂ : tspace β} {t : tspace α} (h₁ : t ∈ t₁) :
cont t t₂ f → cont (Inf t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_le_dom $ Inf_le h₁
lemma continuous_Inf_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : set (tspace β)}
(h : ∀t∈t₂, cont t₁ t f) : cont t₁ (Inf t₂) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_Inf $ assume b hb, continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 $ h b hb
lemma continuous_infi_dom {t₁ : ι → tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β} {i : ι} :
cont (t₁ i) t₂ f → cont (infi t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_le_dom $ infi_le _ _
lemma continuous_infi_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : ι → tspace β}
(h : ∀i, cont t₁ (t₂ i) f) : cont t₁ (infi t₂) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_infi $ assume i, continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 $ h i
@[continuity] lemma continuous_bot {t : tspace β} : cont ⊥ t f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 $ bot_le
@[continuity] lemma continuous_top {t : tspace α} : cont t ⊤ f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_top
/- 𝓝 in the induced topology -/
theorem mem_nhds_induced [T : topological_space α] (f : β → α) (a : β) (s : set β) :
s ∈ @nhds β (topological_space.induced f T) a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (f a), f ⁻¹' u ⊆ s :=
begin
simp only [mem_nhds_sets_iff, is_open_induced_iff, exists_prop, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, usub, ⟨v, openv, ueq⟩, au⟩,
exact ⟨v, ⟨v, set.subset.refl v, openv, by rwa ←ueq at au⟩, by rw ueq; exact usub⟩ },
rintros ⟨u, ⟨v, vsubu, openv, amem⟩, finvsub⟩,
exact ⟨f ⁻¹' v, set.subset.trans (set.preimage_mono vsubu) finvsub, ⟨⟨v, openv, rfl⟩, amem⟩⟩
end
theorem nhds_induced [T : topological_space α] (f : β → α) (a : β) :
@nhds β (topological_space.induced f T) a = comap f (𝓝 (f a)) :=
by { ext s, rw [mem_nhds_induced, mem_comap_sets] }
lemma induced_iff_nhds_eq [tα : topological_space α] [tβ : topological_space β] (f : β → α) :
tβ = tα.induced f ↔ ∀ b, 𝓝 b = comap f (𝓝 $ f b) :=
⟨λ h a, h.symm ▸ nhds_induced f a, λ h, eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ λ x, by rw [h, nhds_induced]⟩
theorem map_nhds_induced_of_surjective [T : topological_space α]
{f : β → α} (hf : function.surjective f) (a : β) :
map f (@nhds β (topological_space.induced f T) a) = 𝓝 (f a) :=
by rw [nhds_induced, map_comap_of_surjective hf]
end constructions
section induced
open topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variables [t : topological_space β] {f : α → β}
theorem is_open_induced_eq {s : set α} :
@is_open _ (induced f t) s ↔ s ∈ preimage f '' {s | is_open s} :=
iff.rfl
theorem is_open_induced {s : set β} (h : is_open s) : (induced f t).is_open (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨s, h, rfl⟩
lemma map_nhds_induced_eq (a : α) : map f (@nhds α (induced f t) a) = 𝓝[range f] (f a) :=
by rw [nhds_induced, filter.map_comap, nhds_within]
lemma map_nhds_induced_of_mem {a : α} (h : range f ∈ 𝓝 (f a)) :
map f (@nhds α (induced f t) a) = 𝓝 (f a) :=
by rw [nhds_induced, filter.map_comap_of_mem h]
lemma closure_induced [t : topological_space β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} :
a ∈ @closure α (topological_space.induced f t) s ↔ f a ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
by simp only [mem_closure_iff_frequently, nhds_induced, frequently_comap, mem_image, and_comm]
end induced
section sierpinski
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
@[simp] lemma is_open_singleton_true : is_open ({true} : set Prop) :=
topological_space.generate_open.basic _ (by simp)
lemma continuous_Prop {p : α → Prop} : continuous p ↔ is_open {x | p x} :=
⟨assume h : continuous p,
have is_open (p ⁻¹' {true}),
from is_open_singleton_true.preimage h,
by simp [preimage, eq_true] at this; assumption,
assume h : is_open {x | p x},
continuous_generated_from $ assume s (hs : s ∈ {{true}}),
by simp at hs; simp [hs, preimage, eq_true, h]⟩
lemma is_open_iff_continuous_mem {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ continuous (λ x, x ∈ s) :=
continuous_Prop.symm
end sierpinski
section infi
variables {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {t : ι → topological_space α}
lemma is_open_supr_iff {s : set α} : @is_open _ (⨆ i, t i) s ↔ ∀ i, @is_open _ (t i) s :=
begin
-- s defines a map from α to Prop, which is continuous iff s is open.
suffices : @continuous _ _ (⨆ i, t i) _ s ↔ ∀ i, @continuous _ _ (t i) _ s,
{ simpa only [continuous_Prop] using this },
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, supr_le_iff]
end
lemma is_closed_infi_iff {s : set α} : @is_closed _ (⨆ i, t i) s ↔ ∀ i, @is_closed _ (t i) s :=
is_open_supr_iff
end infi
|
d372aad4a64bc5288310289121017e50e56f0f20 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/number_theory/prime_counting.lean | 8a61f224fd7806aac850ac205188024fe1069ab0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,386 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey
-/
import data.nat.prime
import data.nat.totient
import data.finset.locally_finite
import data.nat.count
import data.nat.nth
/-!
# The Prime Counting Function
In this file we define the prime counting function: the function on natural numbers that returns
the number of primes less than or equal to its input.
## Main Results
The main definitions for this file are
- `nat.prime_counting`: The prime counting function π
- `nat.prime_counting'`: π(n - 1)
We then prove that these are monotone in `nat.monotone_prime_counting` and
`nat.monotone_prime_counting'`. The last main theorem `nat.prime_counting'_add_le` is an upper
bound on `π'` which arises by observing that all numbers greater than `k` and not coprime to `k`
are not prime, and so only at most `φ(k)/k` fraction of the numbers from `k` to `n` are prime.
## Notation
We use the standard notation `π` to represent the prime counting function (and `π'` to represent
the reindexed version).
-/
namespace nat
open finset
/--
A variant of the traditional prime counting function which gives the number of primes
*strictly* less than the input. More convenient for avoiding off-by-one errors.
-/
def prime_counting' : ℕ → ℕ := nat.count prime
/-- The prime counting function: Returns the number of primes less than or equal to the input. -/
def prime_counting (n : ℕ) : ℕ := prime_counting' (n + 1)
localized "notation (name := prime_counting) `π` := nat.prime_counting" in nat
localized "notation (name := prime_counting') `π'` := nat.prime_counting'" in nat
lemma monotone_prime_counting' : monotone prime_counting' := count_monotone prime
lemma monotone_prime_counting : monotone prime_counting :=
λ a b a_le_b, monotone_prime_counting' (add_le_add_right a_le_b 1)
@[simp] lemma prime_counting'_nth_eq (n : ℕ) : π' (nth prime n) = n :=
count_nth_of_infinite _ infinite_set_of_prime _
@[simp] lemma prime_nth_prime (n : ℕ) : prime (nth prime n) :=
nth_mem_of_infinite _ infinite_set_of_prime _
/-- A linear upper bound on the size of the `prime_counting'` function -/
lemma prime_counting'_add_le {a k : ℕ} (h0 : 0 < a) (h1 : a < k) (n : ℕ) :
π' (k + n) ≤ π' k + nat.totient a * (n / a + 1) :=
calc π' (k + n)
≤ ((range k).filter (prime)).card + ((Ico k (k + n)).filter (prime)).card :
begin
rw [prime_counting', count_eq_card_filter_range, range_eq_Ico,
←Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico (zero_le k) (le_self_add), filter_union],
apply card_union_le,
end
... ≤ π' k + ((Ico k (k + n)).filter (prime)).card :
by rw [prime_counting', count_eq_card_filter_range]
... ≤ π' k + ((Ico k (k + n)).filter (coprime a)).card :
begin
refine add_le_add_left (card_le_of_subset _) k.prime_counting',
simp only [subset_iff, and_imp, mem_filter, mem_Ico],
intros p succ_k_le_p p_lt_n p_prime,
split,
{ exact ⟨succ_k_le_p, p_lt_n⟩, },
{ rw coprime_comm,
exact coprime_of_lt_prime h0 (gt_of_ge_of_gt succ_k_le_p h1) p_prime, },
end
... ≤ π' k + totient a * (n / a + 1) :
begin
rw [add_le_add_iff_left],
exact Ico_filter_coprime_le k n h0,
end
end nat
|
26fbac85982f1ebdad97efec32a153d8b3dafdc5 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/algebra/module/pi.lean | 4adf5a3c12e0899416a8a2782b68d819fe226410 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,524 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Patrick Massot
-/
import algebra.module.basic
import algebra.regular.smul
import algebra.ring.pi
/-!
# Pi instances for module and multiplicative actions
This file defines instances for module, mul_action and related structures on Pi Types
-/
namespace pi
universes u v w
variable {I : Type u} -- The indexing type
variable {f : I → Type v} -- The family of types already equipped with instances
variables (x y : Π i, f i) (i : I)
instance has_scalar {α : Type*} [Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] :
has_scalar α (Π i : I, f i) :=
⟨λ s x, λ i, s • (x i)⟩
lemma smul_def {α : Type*} [Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] (s : α) : s • x = λ i, s • x i := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_apply {α : Type*} [Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] (s : α) : (s • x) i = s • x i := rfl
instance has_scalar' {g : I → Type*} [Π i, has_scalar (f i) (g i)] :
has_scalar (Π i, f i) (Π i : I, g i) :=
⟨λ s x, λ i, (s i) • (x i)⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_apply' {g : I → Type*} [∀ i, has_scalar (f i) (g i)] (s : Π i, f i) (x : Π i, g i) :
(s • x) i = s i • x i :=
rfl
lemma _root_.is_smul_regular.pi {α : Type*} [Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] {k : α}
(hk : Π i, is_smul_regular (f i) k) : is_smul_regular (Π i, f i) k :=
λ _ _ h, funext $ λ i, hk i (congr_fun h i : _)
instance is_scalar_tower {α β : Type*}
[has_scalar α β] [Π i, has_scalar β $ f i] [Π i, has_scalar α $ f i]
[Π i, is_scalar_tower α β (f i)] : is_scalar_tower α β (Π i : I, f i) :=
⟨λ x y z, funext $ λ i, smul_assoc x y (z i)⟩
instance is_scalar_tower' {g : I → Type*} {α : Type*}
[Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] [Π i, has_scalar (f i) (g i)] [Π i, has_scalar α $ g i]
[Π i, is_scalar_tower α (f i) (g i)] : is_scalar_tower α (Π i : I, f i) (Π i : I, g i) :=
⟨λ x y z, funext $ λ i, smul_assoc x (y i) (z i)⟩
instance is_scalar_tower'' {g : I → Type*} {h : I → Type*}
[Π i, has_scalar (f i) (g i)] [Π i, has_scalar (g i) (h i)] [Π i, has_scalar (f i) (h i)]
[Π i, is_scalar_tower (f i) (g i) (h i)] : is_scalar_tower (Π i, f i) (Π i, g i) (Π i, h i) :=
⟨λ x y z, funext $ λ i, smul_assoc (x i) (y i) (z i)⟩
instance smul_comm_class {α β : Type*}
[Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] [Π i, has_scalar β $ f i] [∀ i, smul_comm_class α β (f i)] :
smul_comm_class α β (Π i : I, f i) :=
⟨λ x y z, funext $ λ i, smul_comm x y (z i)⟩
instance smul_comm_class' {g : I → Type*} {α : Type*}
[Π i, has_scalar α $ g i] [Π i, has_scalar (f i) (g i)] [∀ i, smul_comm_class α (f i) (g i)] :
smul_comm_class α (Π i : I, f i) (Π i : I, g i) :=
⟨λ x y z, funext $ λ i, smul_comm x (y i) (z i)⟩
instance smul_comm_class'' {g : I → Type*} {h : I → Type*}
[Π i, has_scalar (g i) (h i)] [Π i, has_scalar (f i) (h i)]
[∀ i, smul_comm_class (f i) (g i) (h i)] : smul_comm_class (Π i, f i) (Π i, g i) (Π i, h i) :=
⟨λ x y z, funext $ λ i, smul_comm (x i) (y i) (z i)⟩
/-- If `f i` has a faithful scalar action for a given `i`, then so does `Π i, f i`. This is
not an instance as `i` cannot be inferred. -/
lemma has_faithful_scalar_at {α : Type*}
[Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] [Π i, nonempty (f i)] (i : I) [has_faithful_scalar α (f i)] :
has_faithful_scalar α (Π i, f i) :=
⟨λ x y h, eq_of_smul_eq_smul $ λ a : f i, begin
classical,
have := congr_fun (h $ function.update (λ j, classical.choice (‹Π i, nonempty (f i)› j)) i a) i,
simpa using this,
end⟩
instance has_faithful_scalar {α : Type*}
[nonempty I] [Π i, has_scalar α $ f i] [Π i, nonempty (f i)] [Π i, has_faithful_scalar α (f i)] :
has_faithful_scalar α (Π i, f i) :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ‹nonempty I› in has_faithful_scalar_at i
instance mul_action (α) {m : monoid α} [Π i, mul_action α $ f i] :
@mul_action α (Π i : I, f i) m :=
{ smul := (•),
mul_smul := λ r s f, funext $ λ i, mul_smul _ _ _,
one_smul := λ f, funext $ λ i, one_smul α _ }
instance mul_action' {g : I → Type*} {m : Π i, monoid (f i)} [Π i, mul_action (f i) (g i)] :
@mul_action (Π i, f i) (Π i : I, g i) (@pi.monoid I f m) :=
{ smul := (•),
mul_smul := λ r s f, funext $ λ i, mul_smul _ _ _,
one_smul := λ f, funext $ λ i, one_smul _ _ }
instance distrib_mul_action (α) {m : monoid α} {n : ∀ i, add_monoid $ f i}
[∀ i, distrib_mul_action α $ f i] :
@distrib_mul_action α (Π i : I, f i) m (@pi.add_monoid I f n) :=
{ smul_zero := λ c, funext $ λ i, smul_zero _,
smul_add := λ c f g, funext $ λ i, smul_add _ _ _,
..pi.mul_action _ }
instance distrib_mul_action' {g : I → Type*} {m : Π i, monoid (f i)} {n : Π i, add_monoid $ g i}
[Π i, distrib_mul_action (f i) (g i)] :
@distrib_mul_action (Π i, f i) (Π i : I, g i) (@pi.monoid I f m) (@pi.add_monoid I g n) :=
{ smul_add := by { intros, ext x, apply smul_add },
smul_zero := by { intros, ext x, apply smul_zero } }
lemma single_smul {α} [monoid α] [Π i, add_monoid $ f i]
[Π i, distrib_mul_action α $ f i] [decidable_eq I] (i : I) (r : α) (x : f i) :
single i (r • x) = r • single i x :=
single_op (λ i : I, ((•) r : f i → f i)) (λ j, smul_zero _) _ _
lemma single_smul' {g : I → Type*} [Π i, monoid_with_zero (f i)] [Π i, add_monoid (g i)]
[Π i, distrib_mul_action (f i) (g i)] [decidable_eq I] (i : I) (r : f i) (x : g i) :
single i (r • x) = single i r • single i x :=
single_op₂ (λ i : I, ((•) : f i → g i → g i)) (λ j, smul_zero _) _ _ _
variables (I f)
instance module (α) {r : semiring α} {m : ∀ i, add_comm_monoid $ f i}
[∀ i, module α $ f i] :
@module α (Π i : I, f i) r (@pi.add_comm_monoid I f m) :=
{ add_smul := λ c f g, funext $ λ i, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ f, funext $ λ i, zero_smul α _,
..pi.distrib_mul_action _ }
variables {I f}
instance module' {g : I → Type*} {r : Π i, semiring (f i)} {m : Π i, add_comm_monoid (g i)}
[Π i, module (f i) (g i)] :
module (Π i, f i) (Π i, g i) :=
{ add_smul := by { intros, ext1, apply add_smul },
zero_smul := by { intros, ext1, apply zero_smul } }
instance (α) {r : semiring α} {m : Π i, add_comm_monoid $ f i}
[Π i, module α $ f i] [∀ i, no_zero_smul_divisors α $ f i] :
no_zero_smul_divisors α (Π i : I, f i) :=
⟨λ c x h, or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr (λ hc, funext
(λ i, (smul_eq_zero.mp (congr_fun h i)).resolve_left hc))⟩
end pi
|
cf9a1c1ade0edf6110835e5833cf6c7953fa7cec | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/category_theory/category/Cat/limit.lean | d5ece82aebf5ca92af06417ab11e81562810924f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,549 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.category.Cat
import category_theory.limits.types
import category_theory.limits.preserves.basic
/-!
# The category of small categories has all small limits.
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
An object in the limit consists of a family of objects,
which are carried to one another by the functors in the diagram.
A morphism between two such objects is a family of morphisms between the corresponding objects,
which are carried to one another by the action on morphisms of the functors in the diagram.
## Future work
Can the indexing category live in a lower universe?
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u
open category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory
variables {J : Type v} [small_category J]
namespace Cat
namespace has_limits
instance category_objects {F : J ⥤ Cat.{u u}} {j} :
small_category ((F ⋙ Cat.objects.{u u}).obj j) :=
(F.obj j).str
/-- Auxiliary definition:
the diagram whose limit gives the morphism space between two objects of the limit category. -/
@[simps]
def hom_diagram {F : J ⥤ Cat.{v v}} (X Y : limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects.{v v})) : J ⥤ Type v :=
{ obj := λ j, limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects) j X ⟶ limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects) j Y,
map := λ j j' f g,
begin
refine eq_to_hom _ ≫ (F.map f).map g ≫ eq_to_hom _,
exact (congr_fun (limit.w (F ⋙ Cat.objects) f) X).symm,
exact (congr_fun (limit.w (F ⋙ Cat.objects) f) Y),
end,
map_id' := λ X, begin
ext f, dsimp,
simp [functor.congr_hom (F.map_id X) f],
end,
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g, begin
ext h, dsimp,
simp [functor.congr_hom (F.map_comp f g) h, eq_to_hom_map],
refl,
end, }
@[simps]
instance (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v v}) : category (limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects)) :=
{ hom := λ X Y, limit (hom_diagram X Y),
id := λ X, types.limit.mk.{v v} (hom_diagram X X) (λ j, 𝟙 _) (λ j j' f, by simp),
comp := λ X Y Z f g, types.limit.mk.{v v} (hom_diagram X Z)
(λ j, limit.π (hom_diagram X Y) j f ≫ limit.π (hom_diagram Y Z) j g)
(λ j j' h, begin
rw [←congr_fun (limit.w (hom_diagram X Y) h) f, ←congr_fun (limit.w (hom_diagram Y Z) h) g],
dsimp,
simp,
end),
id_comp' := λ _ _ _, by { ext, simp only [category.id_comp, types.limit.π_mk'] },
comp_id' := λ _ _ _, by { ext, simp only [types.limit.π_mk', category.comp_id] } }
/-- Auxiliary definition: the limit category. -/
@[simps]
def limit_cone_X (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v v}) : Cat.{v v} :=
{ α := limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects), }.
/-- Auxiliary definition: the cone over the limit category. -/
@[simps]
def limit_cone (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v v}) : cone F :=
{ X := limit_cone_X F,
π :=
{ app := λ j,
{ obj := limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects) j,
map := λ X Y, limit.π (hom_diagram X Y) j, },
naturality' := λ j j' f, category_theory.functor.ext
(λ X, (congr_fun (limit.w (F ⋙ Cat.objects) f) X).symm)
(λ X Y h, (congr_fun (limit.w (hom_diagram X Y) f) h).symm), } }
/-- Auxiliary definition: the universal morphism to the proposed limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def limit_cone_lift (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v v}) (s : cone F) : s.X ⟶ limit_cone_X F :=
{ obj := limit.lift (F ⋙ Cat.objects)
{ X := s.X,
π :=
{ app := λ j, (s.π.app j).obj,
naturality' := λ j j' f, (congr_arg functor.obj (s.π.naturality f) : _), } },
map := λ X Y f,
begin
fapply types.limit.mk.{v v},
{ intro j,
refine eq_to_hom _ ≫ (s.π.app j).map f ≫ eq_to_hom _;
simp, },
{ intros j j' h,
dsimp,
simp only [category.assoc, functor.map_comp,
eq_to_hom_map, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_trans_assoc],
rw [←functor.comp_map],
have := (s.π.naturality h).symm,
conv at this { congr, skip, dsimp, simp, },
erw [functor.congr_hom this f],
dsimp, simp, },
end,
map_id' := λ X, by simp,
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g, by simp }
@[simp]
lemma limit_π_hom_diagram_eq_to_hom {F : J ⥤ Cat.{v v}}
(X Y : limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects.{v v})) (j : J) (h : X = Y) :
limit.π (hom_diagram X Y) j (eq_to_hom h) =
eq_to_hom (congr_arg (limit.π (F ⋙ Cat.objects.{v v}) j) h) :=
by { subst h, simp, }
/-- Auxiliary definition: the proposed cone is a limit cone. -/
def limit_cone_is_limit (F : J ⥤ Cat.{v v}) : is_limit (limit_cone F) :=
{ lift := limit_cone_lift F,
fac' := λ s j, category_theory.functor.ext (by tidy) (λ X Y f, types.limit.π_mk _ _ _ _),
uniq' := λ s m w,
begin
symmetry,
fapply category_theory.functor.ext,
{ intro X,
ext,
dsimp, simp only [types.limit.lift_π_apply', ←w j],
refl, },
{ intros X Y f,
dsimp, simp [(λ j, functor.congr_hom (w j).symm f)],
congr, },
end, }
end has_limits
/-- The category of small categories has all small limits. -/
instance : has_limits (Cat.{v v}) :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J _, by exactI
{ has_limit := λ F, ⟨⟨⟨has_limits.limit_cone F, has_limits.limit_cone_is_limit F⟩⟩⟩, } }
instance : preserves_limits Cat.objects.{v v} :=
{ preserves_limits_of_shape := λ J _, by exactI
{ preserves_limit := λ F,
preserves_limit_of_preserves_limit_cone (has_limits.limit_cone_is_limit F)
(limits.is_limit.of_iso_limit (limit.is_limit (F ⋙ Cat.objects))
(cones.ext (by refl) (by tidy))), }}
end Cat
end category_theory
|
c0b1802288d2dd9ff27fed258ca8920203bf6572 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/limits/types.lean | 9410c3e4c4b4174adf45a43dd59f60bf956ce808 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,017 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Reid Barton
-/
import category_theory.limits.shapes.images
import category_theory.filtered
import tactic.equiv_rw
universes u
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory.limits.types
variables {J : Type u} [small_category J]
/--
(internal implementation) the limit cone of a functor,
implemented as flat sections of a pi type
-/
def limit_cone (F : J ⥤ Type u) : cone F :=
{ X := F.sections,
π := { app := λ j u, u.val j } }
local attribute [elab_simple] congr_fun
/-- (internal implementation) the fact that the proposed limit cone is the limit -/
def limit_cone_is_limit (F : J ⥤ Type u) : is_limit (limit_cone F) :=
{ lift := λ s v, ⟨λ j, s.π.app j v, λ j j' f, congr_fun (cone.w s f) _⟩,
uniq' := by { intros, ext x j, exact congr_fun (w j) x } }
/--
The category of types has all limits.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002U.
-/
instance : has_limits (Type u) :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit.mk
{ cone := limit_cone F, is_limit := limit_cone_is_limit F } } }
/--
The equivalence between a limiting cone of `F` in `Type u` and the "concrete" definition as the
sections of `F`.
-/
def is_limit_equiv_sections {F : J ⥤ Type u} {c : cone F} (t : is_limit c) :
c.X ≃ F.sections :=
(is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso t (limit_cone_is_limit F)).to_equiv
@[simp]
lemma is_limit_equiv_sections_apply {F : J ⥤ Type u} {c : cone F} (t : is_limit c) (j : J) (x : c.X) :
(((is_limit_equiv_sections t) x) : Π j, F.obj j) j = c.π.app j x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma is_limit_equiv_sections_symm_apply {F : J ⥤ Type u} {c : cone F} (t : is_limit c) (x : F.sections) (j : J) :
c.π.app j ((is_limit_equiv_sections t).symm x) = (x : Π j, F.obj j) j :=
begin
equiv_rw (is_limit_equiv_sections t).symm at x,
simp,
end
/--
The equivalence between the abstract limit of `F` in `Type u`
and the "concrete" definition as the sections of `F`.
-/
noncomputable
def limit_equiv_sections (F : J ⥤ Type u) : (limit F : Type u) ≃ F.sections :=
is_limit_equiv_sections (limit.is_limit _)
@[simp]
lemma limit_equiv_sections_apply (F : J ⥤ Type u) (x : limit F) (j : J) :
(((limit_equiv_sections F) x) : Π j, F.obj j) j = limit.π F j x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma limit_equiv_sections_symm_apply (F : J ⥤ Type u) (x : F.sections) (j : J) :
limit.π F j ((limit_equiv_sections F).symm x) = (x : Π j, F.obj j) j :=
is_limit_equiv_sections_symm_apply _ _ _
/--
Construct a term of `limit F : Type u` from a family of terms `x : Π j, F.obj j`
which are "coherent": `∀ (j j') (f : j ⟶ j'), F.map f (x j) = x j'`.
-/
@[ext]
noncomputable
def limit.mk (F : J ⥤ Type u) (x : Π j, F.obj j) (h : ∀ (j j') (f : j ⟶ j'), F.map f (x j) = x j') :
(limit F : Type u) :=
(limit_equiv_sections F).symm ⟨x, h⟩
@[simp]
lemma limit.π_mk (F : J ⥤ Type u) (x : Π j, F.obj j) (h : ∀ (j j') (f : j ⟶ j'), F.map f (x j) = x j') (j) :
limit.π F j (limit.mk F x h) = x j :=
by { dsimp [limit.mk], simp, }
-- PROJECT: prove this for concrete categories where the forgetful functor preserves limits
@[ext]
lemma limit_ext (F : J ⥤ Type u) (x y : limit F) (w : ∀ j, limit.π F j x = limit.π F j y) :
x = y :=
begin
apply (limit_equiv_sections F).injective,
ext j,
simp [w j],
end
-- TODO: are there other limits lemmas that should have `_apply` versions?
-- Can we generate these like with `@[reassoc]`?
-- PROJECT: prove these for any concrete category where the forgetful functor preserves limits?
@[simp]
lemma limit.w_apply {F : J ⥤ Type u} {j j' : J} {x : limit F} (f : j ⟶ j') :
F.map f (limit.π F j x) = limit.π F j' x :=
congr_fun (limit.w F f) x
@[simp]
lemma limit.lift_π_apply (F : J ⥤ Type u) (s : cone F) (j : J) (x : s.X) :
limit.π F j (limit.lift F s x) = s.π.app j x :=
congr_fun (limit.lift_π s j) x
@[simp]
lemma limit.map_π_apply {F G : J ⥤ Type u} (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) (x) :
limit.π G j (lim.map α x) = α.app j (limit.π F j x) :=
congr_fun (limit.map_π α j) x
/--
The relation defining the quotient type which implements the colimit of a functor `F : J ⥤ Type u`.
See `category_theory.limits.types.quot`.
-/
def quot.rel (F : J ⥤ Type u) : (Σ j, F.obj j) → (Σ j, F.obj j) → Prop :=
(λ p p', ∃ f : p.1 ⟶ p'.1, p'.2 = F.map f p.2)
/--
A quotient type implementing the colimit of a functor `F : J ⥤ Type u`,
as pairs `⟨j, x⟩` where `x : F.obj j`, modulo the equivalence relation generated by
`⟨j, x⟩ ~ ⟨j', x'⟩` whenever there is a morphism `f : j ⟶ j'` so `F.map f x = x'`.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def quot (F : J ⥤ Type u) : Type u :=
@quot (Σ j, F.obj j) (quot.rel F)
/--
(internal implementation) the colimit cocone of a functor,
implemented as a quotient of a sigma type
-/
def colimit_cocone (F : J ⥤ Type u) : cocone F :=
{ X := quot F,
ι :=
{ app := λ j x, quot.mk _ ⟨j, x⟩,
naturality' := λ j j' f, funext $ λ x, eq.symm (quot.sound ⟨f, rfl⟩) } }
local attribute [elab_with_expected_type] quot.lift
/-- (internal implementation) the fact that the proposed colimit cocone is the colimit -/
def colimit_cocone_is_colimit (F : J ⥤ Type u) : is_colimit (colimit_cocone F) :=
{ desc := λ s, quot.lift (λ (p : Σ j, F.obj j), s.ι.app p.1 p.2)
(assume ⟨j, x⟩ ⟨j', x'⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩, by rw hf; exact (congr_fun (cocone.w s f) x).symm) }
/--
The category of types has all colimits.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002U.
-/
instance : has_colimits (Type u) :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit.mk
{ cocone := colimit_cocone F, is_colimit := colimit_cocone_is_colimit F } } }
/--
The equivalence between the abstract colimit of `F` in `Type u`
and the "concrete" definition as a quotient.
-/
noncomputable
def colimit_equiv_quot (F : J ⥤ Type u) : (colimit F : Type u) ≃ quot F :=
(is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso (colimit.is_colimit F) (colimit_cocone_is_colimit F)).to_equiv
@[simp]
lemma colimit_equiv_quot_symm_apply (F : J ⥤ Type u) (j : J) (x : F.obj j) :
(colimit_equiv_quot F).symm (quot.mk _ ⟨j, x⟩) = colimit.ι F j x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma colimit_equiv_quot_apply (F : J ⥤ Type u) (j : J) (x : F.obj j) :
(colimit_equiv_quot F) (colimit.ι F j x) = quot.mk _ ⟨j, x⟩ :=
begin
apply (colimit_equiv_quot F).symm.injective,
simp,
end
@[simp]
lemma colimit.w_apply {F : J ⥤ Type u} {j j' : J} {x : F.obj j} (f : j ⟶ j') :
colimit.ι F j' (F.map f x) = colimit.ι F j x :=
congr_fun (colimit.w F f) x
@[simp]
lemma colimit.ι_desc_apply (F : J ⥤ Type u) (s : cocone F) (j : J) (x : F.obj j) :
colimit.desc F s (colimit.ι F j x) = s.ι.app j x :=
congr_fun (colimit.ι_desc s j) x
@[simp]
lemma colimit.ι_map_apply {F G : J ⥤ Type u} (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) (x) :
colim.map α (colimit.ι F j x) = colimit.ι G j (α.app j x) :=
congr_fun (colimit.ι_map α j) x
lemma colimit_sound
{F : J ⥤ Type u} {j j' : J} {x : F.obj j} {x' : F.obj j'} (f : j ⟶ j') (w : F.map f x = x') :
colimit.ι F j x = colimit.ι F j' x' :=
begin
rw [←w],
simp,
end
lemma colimit_sound'
{F : J ⥤ Type u} {j j' : J} {x : F.obj j} {x' : F.obj j'} {j'' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'') (f' : j' ⟶ j'')
(w : F.map f x = F.map f' x') :
colimit.ι F j x = colimit.ι F j' x' :=
begin
rw [←colimit.w _ f, ←colimit.w _ f'],
rw [types_comp_apply, types_comp_apply, w],
end
lemma colimit_eq {F : J ⥤ Type u } {j j' : J} {x : F.obj j} {x' : F.obj j'}
(w : colimit.ι F j x = colimit.ι F j' x') : eqv_gen (quot.rel F) ⟨j, x⟩ ⟨j', x'⟩ :=
begin
apply quot.eq.1,
simpa using congr_arg (colimit_equiv_quot F) w,
end
lemma jointly_surjective (F : J ⥤ Type u) {t : cocone F} (h : is_colimit t)
(x : t.X) : ∃ j y, t.ι.app j y = x :=
begin
suffices : (λ (x : t.X), ulift.up (∃ j y, t.ι.app j y = x)) = (λ _, ulift.up true),
{ have := congr_fun this x,
have H := congr_arg ulift.down this,
dsimp at H,
rwa eq_true at H },
refine h.hom_ext _,
intro j, ext y,
erw iff_true,
exact ⟨j, y, rfl⟩
end
/-- A variant of `jointly_surjective` for `x : colimit F`. -/
lemma jointly_surjective' {F : J ⥤ Type u}
(x : colimit F) : ∃ j y, colimit.ι F j y = x :=
jointly_surjective F (colimit.is_colimit _) x
namespace filtered_colimit
/- For filtered colimits of types, we can give an explicit description
of the equivalence relation generated by the relation used to form
the colimit. -/
variables (F : J ⥤ Type u)
/--
An alternative relation on `Σ j, F.obj j`,
which generates the same equivalence relation as we use to define the colimit in `Type` above,
but that is more convenient when working with filtered colimits.
Elements in `F.obj j` and `F.obj j'` are equivalent if there is some `k : J` to the right
where their images are equal.
-/
protected def r (x y : Σ j, F.obj j) : Prop :=
∃ k (f : x.1 ⟶ k) (g : y.1 ⟶ k), F.map f x.2 = F.map g y.2
protected lemma r_ge (x y : Σ j, F.obj j) :
(∃ f : x.1 ⟶ y.1, y.2 = F.map f x.2) → filtered_colimit.r F x y :=
λ ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨y.1, f, 𝟙 y.1, by simp [hf]⟩
variables (t : cocone F)
local attribute [elab_simple] nat_trans.app
/-- Recognizing filtered colimits of types. -/
noncomputable def is_colimit_of (hsurj : ∀ (x : t.X), ∃ i xi, x = t.ι.app i xi)
(hinj : ∀ i j xi xj, t.ι.app i xi = t.ι.app j xj →
∃ k (f : i ⟶ k) (g : j ⟶ k), F.map f xi = F.map g xj) : is_colimit t :=
-- Strategy: Prove that the map from "the" colimit of F (defined above) to t.X
-- is a bijection.
begin
apply is_colimit.of_iso_colimit (colimit.is_colimit F),
refine cocones.ext (equiv.to_iso (equiv.of_bijective _ _)) _,
{ exact colimit.desc F t },
{ split,
{ show function.injective _,
intros a b h,
rcases jointly_surjective F (colimit.is_colimit F) a with ⟨i, xi, rfl⟩,
rcases jointly_surjective F (colimit.is_colimit F) b with ⟨j, xj, rfl⟩,
change (colimit.ι F i ≫ colimit.desc F t) xi = (colimit.ι F j ≫ colimit.desc F t) xj at h,
rw [colimit.ι_desc, colimit.ι_desc] at h,
rcases hinj i j xi xj h with ⟨k, f, g, h'⟩,
change colimit.ι F i xi = colimit.ι F j xj,
rw [←colimit.w F f, ←colimit.w F g],
change colimit.ι F k (F.map f xi) = colimit.ι F k (F.map g xj),
rw h' },
{ show function.surjective _,
intro x,
rcases hsurj x with ⟨i, xi, rfl⟩,
use colimit.ι F i xi,
simp } },
{ intro j, apply colimit.ι_desc }
end
variables [is_filtered_or_empty J]
protected lemma r_equiv : equivalence (filtered_colimit.r F) :=
⟨λ x, ⟨x.1, 𝟙 x.1, 𝟙 x.1, rfl⟩,
λ x y ⟨k, f, g, h⟩, ⟨k, g, f, h.symm⟩,
λ x y z ⟨k, f, g, h⟩ ⟨k', f', g', h'⟩,
let ⟨l, fl, gl, _⟩ := is_filtered_or_empty.cocone_objs k k',
⟨m, n, hn⟩ := is_filtered_or_empty.cocone_maps (g ≫ fl) (f' ≫ gl) in
⟨m, f ≫ fl ≫ n, g' ≫ gl ≫ n, calc
F.map (f ≫ fl ≫ n) x.2
= F.map (fl ≫ n) (F.map f x.2) : by simp
... = F.map (fl ≫ n) (F.map g y.2) : by rw h
... = F.map ((g ≫ fl) ≫ n) y.2 : by simp
... = F.map ((f' ≫ gl) ≫ n) y.2 : by rw hn
... = F.map (gl ≫ n) (F.map f' y.2) : by simp
... = F.map (gl ≫ n) (F.map g' z.2) : by rw h'
... = F.map (g' ≫ gl ≫ n) z.2 : by simp⟩⟩
protected lemma r_eq :
filtered_colimit.r F = eqv_gen (λ x y, ∃ f : x.1 ⟶ y.1, y.2 = F.map f x.2) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rintros ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ ⟨k, f, g, h⟩,
exact eqv_gen.trans _ ⟨k, F.map f x⟩ _ (eqv_gen.rel _ _ ⟨f, rfl⟩)
(eqv_gen.symm _ _ (eqv_gen.rel _ _ ⟨g, h⟩)) },
{ intros x y,
convert relation.eqv_gen_mono (filtered_colimit.r_ge F),
apply propext,
symmetry,
exact relation.eqv_gen_iff_of_equivalence (filtered_colimit.r_equiv F) }
end
lemma colimit_eq_iff_aux {i j : J} {xi : F.obj i} {xj : F.obj j} :
(colimit_cocone F).ι.app i xi = (colimit_cocone F).ι.app j xj ↔
∃ k (f : i ⟶ k) (g : j ⟶ k), F.map f xi = F.map g xj :=
begin
change quot.mk _ _ = quot.mk _ _ ↔ _,
rw [quot.eq, quot.rel, ←filtered_colimit.r_eq],
refl
end
variables {t} (ht : is_colimit t)
lemma is_colimit_eq_iff {i j : J} {xi : F.obj i} {xj : F.obj j} :
t.ι.app i xi = t.ι.app j xj ↔ ∃ k (f : i ⟶ k) (g : j ⟶ k), F.map f xi = F.map g xj :=
let t' := colimit_cocone F,
e : t' ≅ t := is_colimit.unique_up_to_iso (colimit_cocone_is_colimit F) ht,
e' : t'.X ≅ t.X := (cocones.forget _).map_iso e in
begin
refine iff.trans _ (colimit_eq_iff_aux F),
convert e'.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq; rw ←e.hom.w; refl
end
lemma colimit_eq_iff {i j : J} {xi : F.obj i} {xj : F.obj j} :
colimit.ι F i xi = colimit.ι F j xj ↔ ∃ k (f : i ⟶ k) (g : j ⟶ k), F.map f xi = F.map g xj :=
is_colimit_eq_iff _ (colimit.is_colimit F)
end filtered_colimit
variables {α β : Type u} (f : α ⟶ β)
section -- implementation of `has_image`
/-- the image of a morphism in Type is just `set.range f` -/
def image : Type u := set.range f
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (image f) :=
{ default := ⟨f (default α), ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ }
/-- the inclusion of `image f` into the target -/
def image.ι : image f ⟶ β := subtype.val
instance : mono (image.ι f) :=
(mono_iff_injective _).2 subtype.val_injective
variables {f}
/-- the universal property for the image factorisation -/
noncomputable def image.lift (F' : mono_factorisation f) : image f ⟶ F'.I :=
(λ x, F'.e (classical.indefinite_description _ x.2).1 : image f → F'.I)
lemma image.lift_fac (F' : mono_factorisation f) : image.lift F' ≫ F'.m = image.ι f :=
begin
ext x,
change (F'.e ≫ F'.m) _ = _,
rw [F'.fac, (classical.indefinite_description _ x.2).2],
refl,
end
end
/-- the factorisation of any morphism in Type through a mono. -/
def mono_factorisation : mono_factorisation f :=
{ I := image f,
m := image.ι f,
e := set.range_factorization f }
/-- the facorisation through a mono has the universal property of the image. -/
noncomputable def is_image : is_image (mono_factorisation f) :=
{ lift := image.lift,
lift_fac' := image.lift_fac }
instance : has_image f :=
has_image.mk ⟨_, is_image f⟩
instance : has_images (Type u) :=
{ has_image := by apply_instance }
instance : has_image_maps (Type u) :=
{ has_image_map := λ f g st, has_image_map.transport st (mono_factorisation f.hom) (is_image g.hom)
(λ x, ⟨st.right x.1, ⟨st.left (classical.some x.2),
begin
have p := st.w,
replace p := congr_fun p (classical.some x.2),
simp only [functor.id_map, types_comp_apply, subtype.val_eq_coe] at p,
erw [p, classical.some_spec x.2],
end⟩⟩) rfl }
end category_theory.limits.types
|
06f2f30b278b7e4e88c4d145b33ae560bfb1d7d9 | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /library/init/meta/format.lean | 705372a4be98a33a42bb8dd739b12973e4f8d623 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,669 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.meta.options init.function
universes u v
inductive format.color
| red | green | orange | blue | pink | cyan | grey
meta constant format : Type
meta constant format.line : format
meta constant format.space : format
meta constant format.nil : format
meta constant format.compose : format → format → format
meta constant format.nest : nat → format → format
meta constant format.highlight : format → color → format
meta constant format.group : format → format
meta constant format.of_string : string → format
meta constant format.of_nat : nat → format
meta constant format.flatten : format → format
meta constant format.to_string : format → options → string
meta constant format.of_options : options → format
meta constant format.is_nil : format → bool
meta constant trace_fmt {α : Type u} : format → (unit → α) → α
meta instance : inhabited format :=
⟨format.space⟩
meta instance : has_append format :=
⟨format.compose⟩
meta instance : has_to_string format :=
⟨λ f, format.to_string f options.mk⟩
meta class has_to_format (α : Type u) :=
(to_format : α → format)
meta instance : has_to_format format :=
⟨id⟩
meta def to_fmt {α : Type u} [has_to_format α] : α → format :=
has_to_format.to_format
meta instance nat_to_format : has_coe nat format :=
⟨format.of_nat⟩
meta instance string_to_format : has_coe string format :=
⟨format.of_string⟩
open format list
meta def format.indent (f : format) (n : nat) : format :=
nest n (line ++ f)
meta def format.when {α : Type u} [has_to_format α] : bool → α → format
| tt a := to_fmt a
| ff a := nil
meta def format.join (xs : list format) : format :=
foldl compose (of_string "") xs
meta instance : has_to_format options :=
⟨λ o, format.of_options o⟩
meta instance : has_to_format bool :=
⟨λ b, if b then of_string "tt" else of_string "ff"⟩
meta instance {p : Prop} : has_to_format (decidable p) :=
⟨λ b : decidable p, @ite p b _ (of_string "tt") (of_string "ff")⟩
meta instance : has_to_format string :=
⟨λ s, format.of_string s⟩
meta instance : has_to_format nat :=
⟨λ n, format.of_nat n⟩
meta instance : has_to_format unsigned :=
⟨λ n, to_fmt n.to_nat⟩
meta instance : has_to_format char :=
⟨λ c : char, format.of_string c.to_string⟩
meta def list.to_format {α : Type u} [has_to_format α] : list α → format
| [] := to_fmt "[]"
| xs := to_fmt "[" ++ group (nest 1 $ format.join $ list.intersperse ("," ++ line) $ xs.map to_fmt) ++ to_fmt "]"
meta instance {α : Type u} [has_to_format α] : has_to_format (list α) :=
⟨list.to_format⟩
attribute [instance] string.has_to_format
meta instance : has_to_format name :=
⟨λ n, to_fmt (to_string n)⟩
meta instance : has_to_format unit :=
⟨λ u, to_fmt "()"⟩
meta instance {α : Type u} [has_to_format α] : has_to_format (option α) :=
⟨λ o, option.cases_on o
(to_fmt "none")
(λ a, to_fmt "(some " ++ nest 6 (to_fmt a) ++ to_fmt ")")⟩
meta instance sum_has_to_format {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_to_format α] [has_to_format β] : has_to_format (sum α β) :=
⟨λ s, sum.cases_on s
(λ a, to_fmt "(inl " ++ nest 5 (to_fmt a) ++ to_fmt ")")
(λ b, to_fmt "(inr " ++ nest 5 (to_fmt b) ++ to_fmt ")")⟩
open prod
meta instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_to_format α] [has_to_format β] : has_to_format (prod α β) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, group (nest 1 (to_fmt "(" ++ to_fmt a ++ to_fmt "," ++ line ++ to_fmt b ++ to_fmt ")"))⟩
open sigma
meta instance {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [has_to_format α] [s : ∀ x, has_to_format (β x)]
: has_to_format (sigma β) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, group (nest 1 (to_fmt "⟨" ++ to_fmt a ++ to_fmt "," ++ line ++ to_fmt b ++ to_fmt "⟩"))⟩
open subtype
meta instance {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} [has_to_format α] : has_to_format (subtype p) :=
⟨λ s, to_fmt (val s)⟩
meta def format.bracket : string → string → format → format
| o c f := to_fmt o ++ nest (utf8_length o) f ++ to_fmt c
meta def format.paren (f : format) : format :=
format.bracket "(" ")" f
meta def format.cbrace (f : format) : format :=
format.bracket "{" "}" f
meta def format.sbracket (f : format) : format :=
format.bracket "[" "]" f
meta def format.dcbrace (f : format) : format :=
to_fmt "⦃" ++ nest 1 f ++ to_fmt "⦄"
|
1317a843e37247c27435d5ca1f47f78149bc32b3 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /src/Lean/Elab/App.lean | 378340ca4c6329c85fe2eba8849408628b4503e5 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 66,434 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Util.FindMVar
import Lean.Parser.Term
import Lean.Meta.KAbstract
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.ElimInfo
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.Binders
import Lean.Elab.SyntheticMVars
import Lean.Elab.Arg
import Lean.Elab.RecAppSyntax
namespace Lean.Elab.Term
open Meta
builtin_initialize elabWithoutExpectedTypeAttr : TagAttribute ←
registerTagAttribute `elabWithoutExpectedType "mark that applications of the given declaration should be elaborated without the expected type"
def hasElabWithoutExpectedType (env : Environment) (declName : Name) : Bool :=
elabWithoutExpectedTypeAttr.hasTag env declName
instance : ToString Arg where
toString
| .stx val => toString val
| .expr val => toString val
instance : ToString NamedArg where
toString s := "(" ++ toString s.name ++ " := " ++ toString s.val ++ ")"
def throwInvalidNamedArg (namedArg : NamedArg) (fn? : Option Name) : TermElabM α :=
withRef namedArg.ref <| match fn? with
| some fn => throwError "invalid argument name '{namedArg.name}' for function '{fn}'"
| none => throwError "invalid argument name '{namedArg.name}' for function"
private def ensureArgType (f : Expr) (arg : Expr) (expectedType : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
try
ensureHasTypeAux expectedType (← inferType arg) arg f
catch
| ex@(.error ..) =>
if (← read).errToSorry then
exceptionToSorry ex expectedType
else
throw ex
| ex => throw ex
private def mkProjAndCheck (structName : Name) (idx : Nat) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
let r := mkProj structName idx e
let eType ← inferType e
if (← isProp eType) then
let rType ← inferType r
if !(← isProp rType) then
throwError "invalid projection, the expression{indentExpr e}\nis a proposition and has type{indentExpr eType}\nbut the projected value is not, it has type{indentExpr rType}"
return r
/--
Relevant definitions:
```
class CoeFun (α : Sort u) (γ : α → outParam (Sort v))
```
-/
private def tryCoeFun? (α : Expr) (a : Expr) : TermElabM (Option Expr) := do
let v ← mkFreshLevelMVar
let type ← mkArrow α (mkSort v)
let γ ← mkFreshExprMVar type
let u ← getLevel α
let coeFunInstType := mkAppN (Lean.mkConst ``CoeFun [u, v]) #[α, γ]
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar coeFunInstType MetavarKind.synthetic
let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
try
if (← synthesizeCoeInstMVarCore mvarId) then
expandCoe <| mkAppN (Lean.mkConst ``CoeFun.coe [u, v]) #[α, γ, mvar, a]
else
return none
catch _ =>
return none
def synthesizeAppInstMVars (instMVars : Array MVarId) (app : Expr) : TermElabM Unit :=
for mvarId in instMVars do
unless (← synthesizeInstMVarCore mvarId) do
registerSyntheticMVarWithCurrRef mvarId SyntheticMVarKind.typeClass
registerMVarErrorImplicitArgInfo mvarId (← getRef) app
/-- Return `some namedArg` if `namedArgs` contains an entry for `binderName`. -/
private def findBinderName? (namedArgs : List NamedArg) (binderName : Name) : Option NamedArg :=
namedArgs.find? fun namedArg => namedArg.name == binderName
/-- Erase entry for `binderName` from `namedArgs`. -/
def eraseNamedArg (namedArgs : List NamedArg) (binderName : Name) : List NamedArg :=
namedArgs.filter (·.name != binderName)
/-- Return true if the given type contains `OptParam` or `AutoParams` -/
private def hasOptAutoParams (type : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
forallTelescopeReducing type fun xs _ =>
xs.anyM fun x => do
let xType ← inferType x
return xType.getOptParamDefault?.isSome || xType.getAutoParamTactic?.isSome
/-! # Default application elaborator -/
namespace ElabAppArgs
structure Context where
/--
`true` if `..` was used
-/
ellipsis : Bool --
/--
`true` if `@` modifier was used
-/
explicit : Bool
/--
If the result type of an application is the `outParam` of some local instance, then special support may be needed
because type class resolution interacts poorly with coercions in this kind of situation.
This flag enables the special support.
The idea is quite simple, if the result type is the `outParam` of some local instance, we simply
execute `synthesizeSyntheticMVarsUsingDefault`. We added this feature to make sure examples as follows
are correctly elaborated.
```lean
class GetElem (Cont : Type u) (Idx : Type v) (Elem : outParam (Type w)) where
getElem (xs : Cont) (i : Idx) : Elem
export GetElem (getElem)
instance : GetElem (Array α) Nat α where
getElem xs i := xs.get ⟨i, sorry⟩
opaque f : Option Bool → Bool
opaque g : Bool → Bool
def bad (xs : Array Bool) : Bool :=
let x := getElem xs 0
f x && g x
```
Without the special support, Lean fails at `g x` saying `x` has type `Option Bool` but is expected to have type `Bool`.
From the users point of view this is a bug, since `let x := getElem xs 0` clearly constraints `x` to be `Bool`, but
we only obtain this information after we apply the `OfNat` default instance for `0`.
Before converging to this solution, we have tried to create a "coercion placeholder" when `resultIsOutParamSupport = true`,
but it did not work well in practice. For example, it failed in the example above.
-/
resultIsOutParamSupport : Bool
/-- Auxiliary structure for elaborating the application `f args namedArgs`. -/
structure State where
f : Expr
fType : Expr
/-- Remaining regular arguments. -/
args : List Arg
/-- remaining named arguments to be processed. -/
namedArgs : List NamedArg
expectedType? : Option Expr
/--
When named arguments are provided and explicit arguments occurring before them are missing,
the elaborator eta-expands the declaration. For example,
```
def f (x y : Nat) := x + y
#check f (y := 5)
-- fun x => f x 5
```
`etaArgs` stores the fresh free variables for implementing the eta-expansion.
When `..` is used, eta-expansion is disabled, and missing arguments are treated as `_`.
-/
etaArgs : Array Expr := #[]
/-- Metavariables that we need the set the error context using the application being built. -/
toSetErrorCtx : Array MVarId := #[]
/-- Metavariables for the instance implicit arguments that have already been processed. -/
instMVars : Array MVarId := #[]
/--
The following field is used to implement the `propagateExpectedType` heuristic.
It is set to `true` true when `expectedType` still has to be propagated.
-/
propagateExpected : Bool
/--
If the result type may be the `outParam` of some local instance.
See comment at `Context.resultIsOutParamSupport`
-/
resultTypeOutParam? : Option MVarId := none
abbrev M := ReaderT Context (StateRefT State TermElabM)
/-- Add the given metavariable to the collection of metavariables associated with instance-implicit arguments. -/
private def addInstMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with instMVars := s.instMVars.push mvarId }
/--
Try to synthesize metavariables are `instMVars` using type class resolution.
The ones that cannot be synthesized yet are registered.
Remark: we use this method before trying to apply coercions to function. -/
def synthesizeAppInstMVars : M Unit := do
let s ← get
let instMVars := s.instMVars
modify fun s => { s with instMVars := #[] }
Term.synthesizeAppInstMVars instMVars s.f
/-- fType may become a forallE after we synthesize pending metavariables. -/
private def synthesizePendingAndNormalizeFunType : M Unit := do
synthesizeAppInstMVars
synthesizeSyntheticMVars
let s ← get
let fType ← whnfForall s.fType
if fType.isForall then
modify fun s => { s with fType }
else
match (← tryCoeFun? fType s.f) with
| some f =>
let fType ← inferType f
modify fun s => { s with f, fType }
| none =>
for namedArg in s.namedArgs do
let f := s.f.getAppFn
if f.isConst then
throwInvalidNamedArg namedArg f.constName!
else
throwInvalidNamedArg namedArg none
throwError "function expected at{indentExpr s.f}\nterm has type{indentExpr fType}"
/-- Normalize and return the function type. -/
private def normalizeFunType : M Expr := do
let s ← get
let fType ← whnfForall s.fType
modify fun s => { s with fType }
return fType
/-- Return the binder name at `fType`. This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def getBindingName : M Name := return (← get).fType.bindingName!
/-- Return the next argument expected type. This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def getArgExpectedType : M Expr := return (← get).fType.bindingDomain!
/-- Remove named argument with name `binderName` from `namedArgs`. -/
def eraseNamedArg (binderName : Name) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with namedArgs := Term.eraseNamedArg s.namedArgs binderName }
/--
Add a new argument to the result. That is, `f := f arg`, update `fType`.
This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def addNewArg (argName : Name) (arg : Expr) : M Unit := do
modify fun s => { s with f := mkApp s.f arg, fType := s.fType.bindingBody!.instantiate1 arg }
if arg.isMVar then
let mvarId := arg.mvarId!
if let some mvarErrorInfo ← getMVarErrorInfo? mvarId then
registerMVarErrorInfo { mvarErrorInfo with argName? := argName }
/--
Elaborate the given `Arg` and add it to the result. See `addNewArg`.
Recall that, `Arg` may be wrapping an already elaborated `Expr`. -/
private def elabAndAddNewArg (argName : Name) (arg : Arg) : M Unit := do
let s ← get
let expectedType := (← getArgExpectedType).consumeTypeAnnotations
match arg with
| Arg.expr val =>
let arg ← ensureArgType s.f val expectedType
addNewArg argName arg
| Arg.stx stx =>
let val ← elabTerm stx expectedType
let arg ← withRef stx <| ensureArgType s.f val expectedType
addNewArg argName arg
/-- Return true if `fType` contains `OptParam` or `AutoParams` -/
private def fTypeHasOptAutoParams : M Bool := do
hasOptAutoParams (← get).fType
/--
Auxiliary function for retrieving the resulting type of a function application.
See `propagateExpectedType`.
Remark: `(explicit : Bool) == true` when `@` modifier is used. -/
private partial def getForallBody (explicit : Bool) : Nat → List NamedArg → Expr → Option Expr
| i, namedArgs, type@(.forallE n d b bi) =>
match findBinderName? namedArgs n with
| some _ => getForallBody explicit i (Term.eraseNamedArg namedArgs n) b
| none =>
if !explicit && !bi.isExplicit then
getForallBody explicit i namedArgs b
else if i > 0 then
getForallBody explicit (i-1) namedArgs b
else if d.isAutoParam || d.isOptParam then
getForallBody explicit i namedArgs b
else
some type
| 0, [], type => some type
| _, _, _ => none
private def shouldPropagateExpectedTypeFor (nextArg : Arg) : Bool :=
match nextArg with
| .expr _ => false -- it has already been elaborated
| .stx stx =>
-- TODO: make this configurable?
stx.getKind != ``Lean.Parser.Term.hole &&
stx.getKind != ``Lean.Parser.Term.syntheticHole &&
stx.getKind != ``Lean.Parser.Term.byTactic
/--
Auxiliary method for propagating the expected type. We call it as soon as we find the first explict
argument. The goal is to propagate the expected type in applications of functions such as
```lean
Add.add {α : Type u} : α → α → α
List.cons {α : Type u} : α → List α → List α
```
This is particularly useful when there applicable coercions. For example,
assume we have a coercion from `Nat` to `Int`, and we have
`(x : Nat)` and the expected type is `List Int`. Then, if we don't use this function,
the elaborator will fail to elaborate
```
List.cons x []
```
First, the elaborator creates a new metavariable `?α` for the implicit argument `{α : Type u}`.
Then, when it processes `x`, it assigns `?α := Nat`, and then obtain the
resultant type `List Nat` which is **not** definitionally equal to `List Int`.
We solve the problem by executing this method before we elaborate the first explicit argument (`x` in this example).
This method infers that the resultant type is `List ?α` and unifies it with `List Int`.
Then, when we elaborate `x`, the elaborate realizes the coercion from `Nat` to `Int` must be used, and the
term
```
@List.cons Int (coe x) (@List.nil Int)
```
is produced.
The method will do nothing if
1- The resultant type depends on the remaining arguments (i.e., `!eTypeBody.hasLooseBVars`).
2- The resultant type contains optional/auto params.
We have considered adding the following extra conditions
a) The resultant type does not contain any type metavariable.
b) The resultant type contains a nontype metavariable.
These two conditions would restrict the method to simple functions that are "morally" in
the Hindley&Milner fragment.
If users need to disable expected type propagation, we can add an attribute `[elabWithoutExpectedType]`.
-/
private def propagateExpectedType (arg : Arg) : M Unit := do
if shouldPropagateExpectedTypeFor arg then
let s ← get
-- TODO: handle s.etaArgs.size > 0
unless !s.etaArgs.isEmpty || !s.propagateExpected do
match s.expectedType? with
| none => pure ()
| some expectedType =>
/- We don't propagate `Prop` because we often use `Prop` as a more general "Bool" (e.g., `if-then-else`).
If we propagate `expectedType == Prop` in the following examples, the elaborator would fail
```
def f1 (s : Nat × Bool) : Bool := if s.2 then false else true
def f2 (s : List Bool) : Bool := if s.head! then false else true
def f3 (s : List Bool) : Bool := if List.head! (s.map not) then false else true
```
They would all fail for the same reason. So, let's focus on the first one.
We would elaborate `s.2` with `expectedType == Prop`.
Before we elaborate `s`, this method would be invoked, and `s.fType` is `?α × ?β → ?β` and after
propagation we would have `?α × Prop → Prop`. Then, when we would try to elaborate `s`, and
get a type error because `?α × Prop` cannot be unified with `Nat × Bool`
Most users would have a hard time trying to understand why these examples failed.
Here is a possible alternative workarounds. We give up the idea of using `Prop` at `if-then-else`.
Drawback: users use `if-then-else` with conditions that are not Decidable.
So, users would have to embrace `propDecidable` and `choice`.
This may not be that bad since the developers and users don't seem to care about constructivism.
We currently use a different workaround, we just don't propagate the expected type when it is `Prop`. -/
if expectedType.isProp then
modify fun s => { s with propagateExpected := false }
else
let numRemainingArgs := s.args.length
trace[Elab.app.propagateExpectedType] "etaArgs.size: {s.etaArgs.size}, numRemainingArgs: {numRemainingArgs}, fType: {s.fType}"
match getForallBody (← read).explicit numRemainingArgs s.namedArgs s.fType with
| none => pure ()
| some fTypeBody =>
unless fTypeBody.hasLooseBVars do
unless (← hasOptAutoParams fTypeBody) do
trace[Elab.app.propagateExpectedType] "{expectedType} =?= {fTypeBody}"
if (← isDefEq expectedType fTypeBody) then
/- Note that we only set `propagateExpected := false` when propagation has succeeded. -/
modify fun s => { s with propagateExpected := false }
/-- This method executes after all application arguments have been processed. -/
private def finalize : M Expr := do
let s ← get
let mut e := s.f
-- all user explicit arguments have been consumed
trace[Elab.app.finalize] e
let ref ← getRef
-- Register the error context of implicits
for mvarId in s.toSetErrorCtx do
registerMVarErrorImplicitArgInfo mvarId ref e
if !s.etaArgs.isEmpty then
e ← mkLambdaFVars s.etaArgs e
/-
Remark: we should not use `s.fType` as `eType` even when
`s.etaArgs.isEmpty`. Reason: it may have been unfolded.
-/
let eType ← inferType e
trace[Elab.app.finalize] "after etaArgs, {e} : {eType}"
/- Recall that `resultTypeOutParam? = some mvarId` if the function result type is the output parameter
of a local instance. The value of this parameter may be inferable using other arguments. For example,
suppose we have
```lean
def add_one {X} [Trait X] [One (Trait.R X)] [HAdd X (Trait.R X) X] (x : X) : X := x + (One.one : (Trait.R X))
```
from test `948.lean`. There are multiple ways to infer `X`, and we don't want to mark it as `syntheticOpaque`.
-/
if let some outParamMVarId := s.resultTypeOutParam? then
synthesizeAppInstMVars
/- If `eType != mkMVar outParamMVarId`, then the
function is partially applied, and we do not apply default instances. -/
if !(← outParamMVarId.isAssigned) && eType.isMVar && eType.mvarId! == outParamMVarId then
synthesizeSyntheticMVarsUsingDefault
return e
else
return e
if let some expectedType := s.expectedType? then
-- Try to propagate expected type. Ignore if types are not definitionally equal, caller must handle it.
trace[Elab.app.finalize] "expected type: {expectedType}"
discard <| isDefEq expectedType eType
synthesizeAppInstMVars
return e
/-- Return `true` if there is a named argument that depends on the next argument. -/
private def anyNamedArgDependsOnCurrent : M Bool := do
let s ← get
if s.namedArgs.isEmpty then
return false
else
forallTelescopeReducing s.fType fun xs _ => do
let curr := xs[0]!
for i in [1:xs.size] do
let xDecl ← xs[i]!.fvarId!.getDecl
if s.namedArgs.any fun arg => arg.name == xDecl.userName then
if (← localDeclDependsOn xDecl curr.fvarId!) then
return true
return false
/-- Return `true` if there are regular or named arguments to be processed. -/
private def hasArgsToProcess : M Bool := do
let s ← get
return !s.args.isEmpty || !s.namedArgs.isEmpty
/-- Return `true` if the next argument at `args` is of the form `_` -/
private def isNextArgHole : M Bool := do
match (← get).args with
| Arg.stx (Syntax.node _ ``Lean.Parser.Term.hole _) :: _ => pure true
| _ => pure false
/--
Return `true` if the next argument to be processed is the outparam of a local instance, and it the result type
of the function.
For example, suppose we have the class
```lean
class Get (Cont : Type u) (Idx : Type v) (Elem : outParam (Type w)) where
get (xs : Cont) (i : Idx) : Elem
```
And the current value of `fType` is
```
{Cont : Type u_1} → {Idx : Type u_2} → {Elem : Type u_3} → [self : Get Cont Idx Elem] → Cont → Idx → Elem
```
then the result returned by this method is `false` since `Cont` is not the output param of any local instance.
Now assume `fType` is
```
{Elem : Type u_3} → [self : Get Cont Idx Elem] → Cont → Idx → Elem
```
then, the method returns `true` because `Elem` is an output parameter for the local instance `[self : Get Cont Idx Elem]`.
Remark: if `resultIsOutParamSupport` is `false`, this method returns `false`.
-/
private partial def isNextOutParamOfLocalInstanceAndResult : M Bool := do
if !(← read).resultIsOutParamSupport then
return false
let type := (← get).fType.bindingBody!
unless isResultType type 0 do
return false
if (← hasLocalInstaceWithOutParams type) then
let x := mkFVar (← mkFreshFVarId)
isOutParamOfLocalInstance x (type.instantiate1 x)
else
return false
where
isResultType (type : Expr) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
match type with
| .forallE _ _ b _ => isResultType b (i + 1)
| .bvar idx => idx == i
| _ => false
/-- (quick filter) Return true if `type` constains a binder `[C ...]` where `C` is a class containing outparams. -/
hasLocalInstaceWithOutParams (type : Expr) : CoreM Bool := do
let .forallE _ d b bi := type | return false
if bi.isInstImplicit then
if let .const declName .. := d.getAppFn then
if hasOutParams (← getEnv) declName then
return true
hasLocalInstaceWithOutParams b
isOutParamOfLocalInstance (x : Expr) (type : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
let .forallE _ d b bi := type | return false
if bi.isInstImplicit then
if let .const declName .. := d.getAppFn then
if hasOutParams (← getEnv) declName then
let cType ← inferType d.getAppFn
if (← isOutParamOf x 0 d.getAppArgs cType) then
return true
isOutParamOfLocalInstance x b
isOutParamOf (x : Expr) (i : Nat) (args : Array Expr) (cType : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
if h : i < args.size then
match (← whnf cType) with
| .forallE _ d b _ =>
let arg := args.get ⟨i, h⟩
if arg == x && d.isOutParam then
return true
isOutParamOf x (i+1) args b
| _ => return false
else
return false
mutual
/--
Create a fresh local variable with the current binder name and argument type, add it to `etaArgs` and `f`,
and then execute the main loop.-/
private partial def addEtaArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
let n ← getBindingName
let type ← getArgExpectedType
withLocalDeclD n type fun x => do
modify fun s => { s with etaArgs := s.etaArgs.push x }
addNewArg argName x
main
private partial def addImplicitArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
let argType ← getArgExpectedType
let arg ← if (← isNextOutParamOfLocalInstanceAndResult) then
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar argType
/- When the result type is an output parameter, we don't want to propagate the expected type.
So, we just mark `propagateExpected := false` to disable it.
At `finalize`, we check whether `arg` is still unassigned, if it is, we apply default instances,
and try to synthesize pending mvars. -/
modify fun s => { s with resultTypeOutParam? := some arg.mvarId!, propagateExpected := false }
pure arg
else
mkFreshExprMVar argType
modify fun s => { s with toSetErrorCtx := s.toSetErrorCtx.push arg.mvarId! }
addNewArg argName arg
main
/--
Process a `fType` of the form `(x : A) → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processExplictArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
match (← get).args with
| arg::args =>
propagateExpectedType arg
modify fun s => { s with args }
elabAndAddNewArg argName arg
main
| _ =>
let argType ← getArgExpectedType
match (← read).explicit, argType.getOptParamDefault?, argType.getAutoParamTactic? with
| false, some defVal, _ => addNewArg argName defVal; main
| false, _, some (.const tacticDecl _) =>
let env ← getEnv
let opts ← getOptions
match evalSyntaxConstant env opts tacticDecl with
| Except.error err => throwError err
| Except.ok tacticSyntax =>
-- TODO(Leo): does this work correctly for tactic sequences?
let tacticBlock ← `(by $(⟨tacticSyntax⟩))
let argNew := Arg.stx tacticBlock
propagateExpectedType argNew
elabAndAddNewArg argName argNew
main
| false, _, some _ =>
throwError "invalid autoParam, argument must be a constant"
| _, _, _ =>
if !(← get).namedArgs.isEmpty then
if (← anyNamedArgDependsOnCurrent) then
addImplicitArg argName
else if (← read).ellipsis then
addImplicitArg argName
else
addEtaArg argName
else if !(← read).explicit then
if (← read).ellipsis then
addImplicitArg argName
else if (← fTypeHasOptAutoParams) then
addEtaArg argName
else
finalize
else
finalize
/--
Process a `fType` of the form `{x : A} → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processImplicitArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
if (← read).explicit then
processExplictArg argName
else
addImplicitArg argName
/--
Process a `fType` of the form `{{x : A}} → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processStrictImplicitArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
if (← read).explicit then
processExplictArg argName
else if (← hasArgsToProcess) then
addImplicitArg argName
else
finalize
/--
Process a `fType` of the form `[x : A] → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processInstImplicitArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
if (← read).explicit then
if (← isNextArgHole) then
/- Recall that if '@' has been used, and the argument is '_', then we still use type class resolution -/
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) MetavarKind.synthetic
modify fun s => { s with args := s.args.tail! }
addInstMVar arg.mvarId!
addNewArg argName arg
main
else
processExplictArg argName
else
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) MetavarKind.synthetic
addInstMVar arg.mvarId!
addNewArg argName arg
main
/-- Elaborate function application arguments. -/
partial def main : M Expr := do
let fType ← normalizeFunType
if fType.isForall then
let binderName := fType.bindingName!
let binfo := fType.bindingInfo!
let s ← get
match findBinderName? s.namedArgs binderName with
| some namedArg =>
propagateExpectedType namedArg.val
eraseNamedArg binderName
elabAndAddNewArg binderName namedArg.val
main
| none =>
match binfo with
| .implicit => processImplicitArg binderName
| .instImplicit => processInstImplicitArg binderName
| .strictImplicit => processStrictImplicitArg binderName
| _ => processExplictArg binderName
else if (← hasArgsToProcess) then
synthesizePendingAndNormalizeFunType
main
else
finalize
end
end ElabAppArgs
builtin_initialize elabAsElim : TagAttribute ←
registerTagAttribute `elabAsElim
"instructs elaborator that the arguments of the function application should be elaborated as were an eliminator"
fun declName => do
let go : MetaM Unit := do
discard <| getElimInfo declName
let info ← getConstInfo declName
if (← hasOptAutoParams info.type) then
throwError "[elabAsElim] attribute cannot be used in declarations containing optional and auto parameters"
go.run' {} {}
/-! # Eliminator-like function application elaborator -/
namespace ElabElim
/-- Context of the `elabAsElim` elaboration procedure. -/
structure Context where
elimInfo : ElimInfo
expectedType : Expr
/-- State of the `elabAsElim` elaboration procedure. -/
structure State where
/-- The resultant expression being built. -/
f : Expr
/-- `f : fType -/
fType : Expr
/-- User-provided named arguments that still have to be processed. -/
namedArgs : List NamedArg
/-- User-providedarguments that still have to be processed. -/
args : List Arg
/-- Discriminants processed so far. -/
discrs : Array Expr := #[]
/-- Instance implicit arguments collected so far. -/
instMVars : Array MVarId := #[]
/-- Position of the next argument to be processed. We use it to decide whether the argument is the motive or a discriminant. -/
idx : Nat := 0
/-- Store the metavariable used to represent the motive that will be computed at `finalize`. -/
motive? : Option Expr := none
abbrev M := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State TermElabM
/-- Infer the `motive` using the expected type by `kabstract`ing the discriminants. -/
def mkMotive (discrs : Array Expr) (expectedType : Expr): MetaM Expr := do
discrs.foldrM (init := expectedType) fun discr motive => do
let discr ← instantiateMVars discr
let motiveBody ← kabstract motive discr
/- We use `transform (usedLetOnly := true)` to eliminate unnecessary let-expressions. -/
let discrType ← transform (usedLetOnly := true) (← instantiateMVars (← inferType discr))
return Lean.mkLambda (← mkFreshBinderName) BinderInfo.default discrType motiveBody
/-- If the eliminator is over-applied, we "revert" the extra arguments. -/
def revertArgs (args : List Arg) (f : Expr) (expectedType : Expr) : TermElabM (Expr × Expr) :=
args.foldrM (init := (f, expectedType)) fun arg (f, expectedType) => do
let val ←
match arg with
| .expr val => pure val
| .stx stx => elabTerm stx none
let val ← instantiateMVars val
let expectedTypeBody ← kabstract expectedType val
/- We use `transform (usedLetOnly := true)` to eliminate unnecessary let-expressions. -/
let valType ← transform (usedLetOnly := true) (← instantiateMVars (← inferType val))
return (mkApp f val, mkForall (← mkFreshBinderName) BinderInfo.default valType expectedTypeBody)
/--
Contruct the resulting application after all discriminants have bee elaborated, and we have
consumed as many given arguments as possible.
-/
def finalize : M Expr := do
unless (← get).namedArgs.isEmpty do
throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, unused named arguments: {(← get).namedArgs.map (·.name)}"
let some motive := (← get).motive?
| throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, insufficient number of arguments"
forallTelescope (← get).fType fun xs _ => do
let mut expectedType := (← read).expectedType
let mut f := (← get).f
if xs.size > 0 then
assert! (← get).args.isEmpty
try
expectedType ← instantiateForall expectedType xs
catch _ =>
throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, insufficient number of arguments, expected type:{indentExpr expectedType}"
else
-- over-application, simulate `revert`
(f, expectedType) ← revertArgs (← get).args f expectedType
let result := mkAppN f xs
let mut discrs := (← get).discrs
let idx := (← get).idx
if (← get).discrs.size < (← read).elimInfo.targetsPos.size then
for i in [idx:idx + xs.size], x in xs do
if (← read).elimInfo.targetsPos.contains i then
discrs := discrs.push x
let motiveVal ← mkMotive discrs expectedType
unless (← isDefEq motive motiveVal) do
throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, invalid motive{indentExpr motiveVal}"
synthesizeAppInstMVars (← get).instMVars result
let result ← mkLambdaFVars xs (← instantiateMVars result)
return result
/--
Return the next argument to be processed.
The result is `.none` if it is an implicit argument which was not provided using a named argument.
The result is `.undef` if `args` is empty and `namedArgs` does contain an entry for `binderName`.
-/
def getNextArg? (binderName : Name) (binderInfo : BinderInfo) : M (LOption Arg) := do
match findBinderName? (← get).namedArgs binderName with
| some namedArg =>
modify fun s => { s with namedArgs := eraseNamedArg s.namedArgs binderName }
return .some namedArg.val
| none =>
if binderInfo.isExplicit then
match (← get).args with
| [] => return .undef
| arg :: args =>
modify fun s => { s with args }
return .some arg
else
return .none
/-- Set the `motive` field in the state. -/
def setMotive (motive : Expr) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with motive? := motive }
/-- Push the given expression into the `discrs` field in the state. -/
def addDiscr (discr : Expr) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with discrs := s.discrs.push discr }
/-- Elaborate the given argument with the given expected type. -/
private def elabArg (arg : Arg) (argExpectedType : Expr) : M Expr := do
match arg with
| Arg.expr val => ensureArgType (← get).f val argExpectedType
| Arg.stx stx =>
let val ← elabTerm stx argExpectedType
withRef stx <| ensureArgType (← get).f val argExpectedType
/-- Save information for producing error messages. -/
def saveArgInfo (arg : Expr) (binderName : Name) : M Unit := do
if arg.isMVar then
let mvarId := arg.mvarId!
if let some mvarErrorInfo ← getMVarErrorInfo? mvarId then
registerMVarErrorInfo { mvarErrorInfo with argName? := binderName }
/-- Create an implicit argument using the given `BinderInfo`. -/
def mkImplicitArg (argExpectedType : Expr) (bi : BinderInfo) : M Expr := do
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar argExpectedType (if bi.isInstImplicit then .synthetic else .natural)
if bi.isInstImplicit then
modify fun s => { s with instMVars := s.instMVars.push arg.mvarId! }
return arg
/-- Main loop of the `elimAsElab` procedure. -/
partial def main : M Expr := do
let .forallE binderName binderType body binderInfo ← whnfForall (← get).fType |
finalize
let addArgAndContinue (arg : Expr) : M Expr := do
modify fun s => { s with idx := s.idx + 1, f := mkApp s.f arg, fType := body.instantiate1 arg }
saveArgInfo arg binderName
main
let idx := (← get).idx
if (← read).elimInfo.motivePos == idx then
let motive ← mkImplicitArg binderType binderInfo
setMotive motive
addArgAndContinue motive
else if (← read).elimInfo.targetsPos.contains idx then
match (← getNextArg? binderName binderInfo) with
| .some arg => let discr ← elabArg arg binderType; addDiscr discr; addArgAndContinue discr
| .undef => finalize
| .none => let discr ← mkImplicitArg binderType binderInfo; addDiscr discr; addArgAndContinue discr
else match (← getNextArg? binderName binderInfo) with
| .some (.stx stx) => addArgAndContinue (← postponeElabTerm stx binderType)
| .some (.expr val) => addArgAndContinue (← ensureArgType (← get).f val binderType)
| .undef => finalize
| .none => addArgAndContinue (← mkImplicitArg binderType binderInfo)
end ElabElim
/-- Return `true` if `declName` is a candidate for `ElabElim.main` elaboration. -/
private def shouldElabAsElim (declName : Name) : CoreM Bool := do
if (← isRec declName) then return true
let env ← getEnv
if isCasesOnRecursor env declName then return true
if isBRecOnRecursor env declName then return true
if isRecOnRecursor env declName then return true
return elabAsElim.hasTag env declName
private def propagateExpectedTypeFor (f : Expr) : TermElabM Bool :=
match f.getAppFn.constName? with
| some declName => return !hasElabWithoutExpectedType (← getEnv) declName
| _ => return true
/-! # Function application elaboration -/
/--
Elaborate a `f`-application using `namedArgs` and `args` as the arguments.
- `expectedType?` the expected type if available. It is used to propagate typing information only. This method does **not** ensure the result has this type.
- `explicit = true` when notation `@` is used, and implicit arguments are assumed to be provided at `namedArgs` and `args`.
- `ellipsis = true` when notation `..` is used. That is, we add `_` for missing arguments.
- `resultIsOutParamSupport` is used to control whether special support is used when processing applications of functions that return
output parameter of some local instance. Example:
```
GetElem.getElem : {Cont : Type u_1} → {Idx : Type u_2} → {elem : Type u_3} → {dom : cont → idx → Prop} → [self : GetElem cont idx elem dom] → (xs : cont) → (i : idx) → dom xs i → elem
```
The result type `elem` is the output parameter of the local instance `self`.
When this parameter is set to `true`, we execute `synthesizeSyntheticMVarsUsingDefault`. For additional details, see comment at
`ElabAppArgs.resultIsOutParam`.
-/
def elabAppArgs (f : Expr) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
(expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis : Bool) (resultIsOutParamSupport := true) : TermElabM Expr := do
-- Coercions must be available to use this flag.
-- If `@` is used (i.e., `explicit = true`), we disable `resultIsOutParamSupport`.
let resultIsOutParamSupport := ((← getEnv).contains ``Lean.Internal.coeM) && resultIsOutParamSupport && !explicit
let fType ← inferType f
let fType ← instantiateMVars fType
unless namedArgs.isEmpty && args.isEmpty do
tryPostponeIfMVar fType
trace[Elab.app.args] "explicit: {explicit}, ellipsis: {ellipsis}, {f} : {fType}"
trace[Elab.app.args] "namedArgs: {namedArgs}"
trace[Elab.app.args] "args: {args}"
if let some elimInfo ← elabAsElim? then
tryPostponeIfNoneOrMVar expectedType?
let some expectedType := expectedType? | throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, expected type is not available"
let expectedType ← instantiateMVars expectedType
if expectedType.getAppFn.isMVar then throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, expected type is not available"
ElabElim.main.run { elimInfo, expectedType } |>.run' {
f, fType
args := args.toList
namedArgs := namedArgs.toList
}
else
ElabAppArgs.main.run { explicit, ellipsis, resultIsOutParamSupport } |>.run' {
args := args.toList
expectedType?, f, fType
namedArgs := namedArgs.toList
propagateExpected := (← propagateExpectedTypeFor f)
}
where
/-- Return `some info` if we should elaborate as an eliminator. -/
elabAsElim? : TermElabM (Option ElimInfo) := do
if explicit || ellipsis then return none
let .const declName _ := f | return none
unless (← shouldElabAsElim declName) do return none
let elimInfo ← getElimInfo declName
forallTelescopeReducing (← inferType f) fun xs _ => do
if h : elimInfo.motivePos < xs.size then
let x := xs[elimInfo.motivePos]
let localDecl ← x.fvarId!.getDecl
if findBinderName? namedArgs.toList localDecl.userName matches some _ then
-- motive has been explicitly provided, so we should use standard app elaborator
return none
return some elimInfo
else
return none
/-- Auxiliary inductive datatype that represents the resolution of an `LVal`. -/
inductive LValResolution where
| projFn (baseStructName : Name) (structName : Name) (fieldName : Name)
| projIdx (structName : Name) (idx : Nat)
| const (baseStructName : Name) (structName : Name) (constName : Name)
| localRec (baseName : Name) (fullName : Name) (fvar : Expr)
private def throwLValError (e : Expr) (eType : Expr) (msg : MessageData) : TermElabM α :=
throwError "{msg}{indentExpr e}\nhas type{indentExpr eType}"
/--
`findMethod? env S fName`.
- If `env` contains `S ++ fName`, return `(S, S++fName)`
- Otherwise if `env` contains private name `prv` for `S ++ fName`, return `(S, prv)`, o
- Otherwise for each parent structure `S'` of `S`, we try `findMethod? env S' fname`
-/
private partial def findMethod? (env : Environment) (structName fieldName : Name) : Option (Name × Name) :=
let fullName := structName ++ fieldName
match env.find? fullName with
| some _ => some (structName, fullName)
| none =>
let fullNamePrv := mkPrivateName env fullName
match env.find? fullNamePrv with
| some _ => some (structName, fullNamePrv)
| none =>
if isStructure env structName then
(getParentStructures env structName).findSome? fun parentStructName => findMethod? env parentStructName fieldName
else
none
/--
Return `some (structName', fullName)` if `structName ++ fieldName` is an alias for `fullName`, and
`fullName` is of the form `structName' ++ fieldName`.
TODO: if there is more than one applicable alias, it returns `none`. We should consider throwing an error or
warning.
-/
private def findMethodAlias? (env : Environment) (structName fieldName : Name) : Option (Name × Name) :=
let fullName := structName ++ fieldName
-- We never skip `protected` aliases when resolving dot-notation.
let aliasesCandidates := getAliases env fullName (skipProtected := false) |>.filterMap fun alias =>
match alias.eraseSuffix? fieldName with
| none => none
| some structName' => some (structName', alias)
match aliasesCandidates with
| [r] => some r
| _ => none
private def throwInvalidFieldNotation (e eType : Expr) : TermElabM α :=
throwLValError e eType "invalid field notation, type is not of the form (C ...) where C is a constant"
private def resolveLValAux (e : Expr) (eType : Expr) (lval : LVal) : TermElabM LValResolution := do
if eType.isForall then
match lval with
| LVal.fieldName _ fieldName _ _ =>
let fullName := `Function ++ fieldName
if (← getEnv).contains fullName then
return LValResolution.const `Function `Function fullName
| _ => pure ()
match eType.getAppFn.constName?, lval with
| some structName, LVal.fieldIdx _ idx =>
if idx == 0 then
throwError "invalid projection, index must be greater than 0"
let env ← getEnv
unless isStructureLike env structName do
throwLValError e eType "invalid projection, structure expected"
let numFields := getStructureLikeNumFields env structName
if idx - 1 < numFields then
if isStructure env structName then
let fieldNames := getStructureFields env structName
return LValResolution.projFn structName structName fieldNames[idx - 1]!
else
/- `structName` was declared using `inductive` command.
So, we don't projection functions for it. Thus, we use `Expr.proj` -/
return LValResolution.projIdx structName (idx - 1)
else
throwLValError e eType m!"invalid projection, structure has only {numFields} field(s)"
| some structName, LVal.fieldName _ fieldName _ _ =>
let env ← getEnv
let searchEnv : Unit → TermElabM LValResolution := fun _ => do
if let some (baseStructName, fullName) := findMethod? env structName fieldName then
return LValResolution.const baseStructName structName fullName
else if let some (structName', fullName) := findMethodAlias? env structName fieldName then
return LValResolution.const structName' structName' fullName
else
throwLValError e eType
m!"invalid field '{fieldName}', the environment does not contain '{Name.mkStr structName fieldName}'"
-- search local context first, then environment
let searchCtx : Unit → TermElabM LValResolution := fun _ => do
let fullName := Name.mkStr structName fieldName
for localDecl in (← getLCtx) do
if localDecl.binderInfo == BinderInfo.auxDecl then
if let some localDeclFullName := (← read).auxDeclToFullName.find? localDecl.fvarId then
if fullName == (privateToUserName? localDeclFullName).getD localDeclFullName then
/- LVal notation is being used to make a "local" recursive call. -/
return LValResolution.localRec structName fullName localDecl.toExpr
searchEnv ()
if isStructure env structName then
match findField? env structName (Name.mkSimple fieldName) with
| some baseStructName => return LValResolution.projFn baseStructName structName (Name.mkSimple fieldName)
| none => searchCtx ()
else
searchCtx ()
| none, LVal.fieldName _ _ (some suffix) _ =>
if e.isConst then
throwUnknownConstant (e.constName! ++ suffix)
else
throwInvalidFieldNotation e eType
| _, _ => throwInvalidFieldNotation e eType
/-- whnfCore + implicit consumption.
Example: given `e` with `eType := {α : Type} → (fun β => List β) α `, it produces `(e ?m, List ?m)` where `?m` is fresh metavariable. -/
private partial def consumeImplicits (stx : Syntax) (e eType : Expr) (hasArgs : Bool) : TermElabM (Expr × Expr) := do
let eType ← whnfCore eType
match eType with
| .forallE _ d b bi =>
if bi.isImplicit || (hasArgs && bi.isStrictImplicit) then
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar d
registerMVarErrorHoleInfo mvar.mvarId! stx
consumeImplicits stx (mkApp e mvar) (b.instantiate1 mvar) hasArgs
else if bi.isInstImplicit then
let mvar ← mkInstMVar d
let r := mkApp e mvar
registerMVarErrorImplicitArgInfo mvar.mvarId! stx r
consumeImplicits stx r (b.instantiate1 mvar) hasArgs
else match d.getOptParamDefault? with
| some defVal => consumeImplicits stx (mkApp e defVal) (b.instantiate1 defVal) hasArgs
-- TODO: we do not handle autoParams here.
| _ => return (e, eType)
| _ => return (e, eType)
private partial def resolveLValLoop (lval : LVal) (e eType : Expr) (previousExceptions : Array Exception) (hasArgs : Bool) : TermElabM (Expr × LValResolution) := do
let (e, eType) ← consumeImplicits lval.getRef e eType hasArgs
tryPostponeIfMVar eType
/- If `eType` is still a metavariable application, we try to apply default instances to "unblock" it. -/
if (← isMVarApp eType) then
synthesizeSyntheticMVarsUsingDefault
let eType ← instantiateMVars eType
try
let lvalRes ← resolveLValAux e eType lval
return (e, lvalRes)
catch
| ex@(Exception.error _ _) =>
let eType? ← unfoldDefinition? eType
match eType? with
| some eType => resolveLValLoop lval e eType (previousExceptions.push ex) hasArgs
| none =>
previousExceptions.forM fun ex => logException ex
throw ex
| ex@(Exception.internal _ _) => throw ex
private def resolveLVal (e : Expr) (lval : LVal) (hasArgs : Bool) : TermElabM (Expr × LValResolution) := do
let eType ← inferType e
resolveLValLoop lval e eType #[] hasArgs
private partial def mkBaseProjections (baseStructName : Name) (structName : Name) (e : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let env ← getEnv
match getPathToBaseStructure? env baseStructName structName with
| none => throwError "failed to access field in parent structure"
| some path =>
let mut e := e
for projFunName in path do
let projFn ← mkConst projFunName
e ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr e }] (args := #[]) (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
return e
private def typeMatchesBaseName (type : Expr) (baseName : Name) : MetaM Bool := do
if baseName == `Function then
return (← whnfR type).isForall
else if type.consumeMData.isAppOf baseName then
return true
else
return (← whnfR type).isAppOf baseName
/-- Auxiliary method for field notation. It tries to add `e` as a new argument to `args` or `namedArgs`.
This method first finds the parameter with a type of the form `(baseName ...)`.
When the parameter is found, if it an explicit one and `args` is big enough, we add `e` to `args`.
Otherwise, if there isn't another parameter with the same name, we add `e` to `namedArgs`.
Remark: `fullName` is the name of the resolved "field" access function. It is used for reporting errors -/
private def addLValArg (baseName : Name) (fullName : Name) (e : Expr) (args : Array Arg) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (fType : Expr)
: TermElabM (Array Arg × Array NamedArg) :=
forallTelescopeReducing fType fun xs _ => do
let mut argIdx := 0 -- position of the next explicit argument
let mut remainingNamedArgs := namedArgs
for i in [:xs.size] do
let x := xs[i]!
let xDecl ← x.fvarId!.getDecl
/- If there is named argument with name `xDecl.userName`, then we skip it. -/
match remainingNamedArgs.findIdx? (fun namedArg => namedArg.name == xDecl.userName) with
| some idx =>
remainingNamedArgs := remainingNamedArgs.eraseIdx idx
| none =>
let type := xDecl.type
if (← typeMatchesBaseName type baseName) then
/- We found a type of the form (baseName ...).
First, we check if the current argument is an explicit one,
and the current explicit position "fits" at `args` (i.e., it must be ≤ arg.size) -/
if argIdx ≤ args.size && xDecl.binderInfo.isExplicit then
/- We insert `e` as an explicit argument -/
return (args.insertAt argIdx (Arg.expr e), namedArgs)
/- If we can't add `e` to `args`, we try to add it using a named argument, but this is only possible
if there isn't an argument with the same name occurring before it. -/
for j in [:i] do
let prev := xs[j]!
let prevDecl ← prev.fvarId!.getDecl
if prevDecl.userName == xDecl.userName then
throwError "invalid field notation, function '{fullName}' has argument with the expected type{indentExpr type}\nbut it cannot be used"
return (args, namedArgs.push { name := xDecl.userName, val := Arg.expr e })
if xDecl.binderInfo.isExplicit then
-- advance explicit argument position
argIdx := argIdx + 1
throwError "invalid field notation, function '{fullName}' does not have argument with type ({baseName} ...) that can be used, it must be explicit or implicit with an unique name"
private def elabAppLValsAux (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis : Bool)
(f : Expr) (lvals : List LVal) : TermElabM Expr :=
let rec loop : Expr → List LVal → TermElabM Expr
| f, [] => elabAppArgs f namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
| f, lval::lvals => do
if let LVal.fieldName (ref := fieldStx) (targetStx := targetStx) .. := lval then
addDotCompletionInfo targetStx f expectedType? fieldStx
let hasArgs := !namedArgs.isEmpty || !args.isEmpty
let (f, lvalRes) ← resolveLVal f lval hasArgs
match lvalRes with
| LValResolution.projIdx structName idx =>
let f ← mkProjAndCheck structName idx f
let f ← addTermInfo lval.getRef f
loop f lvals
| LValResolution.projFn baseStructName structName fieldName =>
let f ← mkBaseProjections baseStructName structName f
if let some info := getFieldInfo? (← getEnv) baseStructName fieldName then
if isPrivateNameFromImportedModule (← getEnv) info.projFn then
throwError "field '{fieldName}' from structure '{structName}' is private"
let projFn ← mkConst info.projFn
let projFn ← addTermInfo lval.getRef projFn
if lvals.isEmpty then
let namedArgs ← addNamedArg namedArgs { name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }
elabAppArgs projFn namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
else
let f ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }] #[] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
loop f lvals
else
unreachable!
| LValResolution.const baseStructName structName constName =>
let f ← if baseStructName != structName then mkBaseProjections baseStructName structName f else pure f
let projFn ← mkConst constName
let projFn ← addTermInfo lval.getRef projFn
if lvals.isEmpty then
let projFnType ← inferType projFn
let (args, namedArgs) ← addLValArg baseStructName constName f args namedArgs projFnType
elabAppArgs projFn namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
else
let f ← elabAppArgs projFn #[] #[Arg.expr f] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
loop f lvals
| LValResolution.localRec baseName fullName fvar =>
let fvar ← addTermInfo lval.getRef fvar
if lvals.isEmpty then
let fvarType ← inferType fvar
let (args, namedArgs) ← addLValArg baseName fullName f args namedArgs fvarType
elabAppArgs fvar namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
else
let f ← elabAppArgs fvar #[] #[Arg.expr f] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
loop f lvals
loop f lvals
private def elabAppLVals (f : Expr) (lvals : List LVal) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
(expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis : Bool) : TermElabM Expr := do
if !lvals.isEmpty && explicit then
throwError "invalid use of field notation with `@` modifier"
elabAppLValsAux namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis f lvals
def elabExplicitUnivs (lvls : Array Syntax) : TermElabM (List Level) := do
lvls.foldrM (init := []) fun stx lvls => return (← elabLevel stx)::lvls
/-!
# Interaction between `errToSorry` and `observing`.
- The method `elabTerm` catches exceptions, log them, and returns a synthetic sorry (IF `ctx.errToSorry` == true).
- When we elaborate choice nodes (and overloaded identifiers), we track multiple results using the `observing x` combinator.
The `observing x` executes `x` and returns a `TermElabResult`.
`observing `x does not check for synthetic sorry's, just an exception. Thus, it may think `x` worked when it didn't
if a synthetic sorry was introduced. We decided that checking for synthetic sorrys at `observing` is not a good solution
because it would not be clear to decide what the "main" error message for the alternative is. When the result contains
a synthetic `sorry`, it is not clear which error message corresponds to the `sorry`. Moreover, while executing `x`, many
error messages may have been logged. Recall that we need an error per alternative at `mergeFailures`.
Thus, we decided to set `errToSorry` to `false` whenever processing choice nodes and overloaded symbols.
Important: we rely on the property that after `errToSorry` is set to
false, no elaboration function executed by `x` will reset it to
`true`.
-/
private partial def elabAppFnId (fIdent : Syntax) (fExplicitUnivs : List Level) (lvals : List LVal)
(namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis overloaded : Bool) (acc : Array (TermElabResult Expr))
: TermElabM (Array (TermElabResult Expr)) := do
let funLVals ← withRef fIdent <| resolveName' fIdent fExplicitUnivs expectedType?
let overloaded := overloaded || funLVals.length > 1
-- Set `errToSorry` to `false` if `funLVals` > 1. See comment above about the interaction between `errToSorry` and `observing`.
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with errToSorry := funLVals.length == 1 && ctx.errToSorry }) do
funLVals.foldlM (init := acc) fun acc (f, fIdent, fields) => do
let lvals' := toLVals fields (first := true)
let s ← observing do
let f ← addTermInfo fIdent f expectedType?
let e ← elabAppLVals f (lvals' ++ lvals) namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
if overloaded then ensureHasType expectedType? e else return e
return acc.push s
where
toName (fields : List Syntax) : Name :=
let rec go
| [] => .anonymous
| field :: fields => .mkStr (go fields) field.getId.toString
go fields.reverse
toLVals : List Syntax → (first : Bool) → List LVal
| [], _ => []
| field::fields, true => .fieldName field field.getId.toString (toName (field::fields)) fIdent :: toLVals fields false
| field::fields, false => .fieldName field field.getId.toString none fIdent :: toLVals fields false
/-- Resolve `(.$id:ident)` using the expected type to infer namespace. -/
private partial def resolveDotName (id : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Name := do
tryPostponeIfNoneOrMVar expectedType?
let some expectedType := expectedType?
| throwError "invalid dotted identifier notation, expected type must be known"
forallTelescopeReducing expectedType fun _ resultType => do
go resultType expectedType #[]
where
go (resultType : Expr) (expectedType : Expr) (previousExceptions : Array Exception) : TermElabM Name := do
let resultTypeFn := (← instantiateMVars resultType).cleanupAnnotations.getAppFn
try
tryPostponeIfMVar resultTypeFn
let .const declName .. := resultTypeFn.cleanupAnnotations
| throwError "invalid dotted identifier notation, expected type is not of the form (... → C ...) where C is a constant{indentExpr expectedType}"
let idNew := declName ++ id.getId.eraseMacroScopes
unless (← getEnv).contains idNew do
throwError "invalid dotted identifier notation, unknown identifier `{idNew}` from expected type{indentExpr expectedType}"
return idNew
catch
| ex@(.error ..) =>
match (← unfoldDefinition? resultType) with
| some resultType => go (← whnfCore resultType) expectedType (previousExceptions.push ex)
| none =>
previousExceptions.forM fun ex => logException ex
throw ex
| ex@(.internal _ _) => throw ex
private partial def elabAppFn (f : Syntax) (lvals : List LVal) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
(expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis overloaded : Bool) (acc : Array (TermElabResult Expr)) : TermElabM (Array (TermElabResult Expr)) := do
if f.getKind == choiceKind then
-- Set `errToSorry` to `false` when processing choice nodes. See comment above about the interaction between `errToSorry` and `observing`.
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with errToSorry := false }) do
f.getArgs.foldlM (init := acc) fun acc f => elabAppFn f lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis true acc
else
let elabFieldName (e field : Syntax) := do
let newLVals := field.identComponents.map fun comp =>
-- We use `none` in `suffix?` since `field` can't be part of a composite name
LVal.fieldName comp (toString comp.getId) none e
elabAppFn e (newLVals ++ lvals) namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
let elabFieldIdx (e idxStx : Syntax) := do
let idx := idxStx.isFieldIdx?.get!
elabAppFn e (LVal.fieldIdx idxStx idx :: lvals) namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
match f with
| `($(e).$idx:fieldIdx) => elabFieldIdx e idx
| `($e |>.$idx:fieldIdx) => elabFieldIdx e idx
| `($(e).$field:ident) => elabFieldName e field
| `($e |>.$field:ident) => elabFieldName e field
| `($_:ident@$_:term) =>
throwError "unexpected occurrence of named pattern"
| `($id:ident) => do
elabAppFnId id [] lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
| `($id:ident.{$us,*}) => do
let us ← elabExplicitUnivs us
elabAppFnId id us lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
| `(@$id:ident) =>
elabAppFn id lvals namedArgs args expectedType? (explicit := true) ellipsis overloaded acc
| `(@$_:ident.{$_us,*}) =>
elabAppFn (f.getArg 1) lvals namedArgs args expectedType? (explicit := true) ellipsis overloaded acc
| `(@$_) => throwUnsupportedSyntax -- invalid occurrence of `@`
| `(_) => throwError "placeholders '_' cannot be used where a function is expected"
| `(.$id:ident) =>
addCompletionInfo <| CompletionInfo.dotId f id.getId (← getLCtx) expectedType?
let fConst ← mkConst (← resolveDotName id expectedType?)
let fConst ← addTermInfo f fConst
let s ← observing do
let e ← elabAppLVals fConst lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
if overloaded then ensureHasType expectedType? e else return e
return acc.push s
| _ => do
let catchPostpone := !overloaded
/- If we are processing a choice node, then we should use `catchPostpone == false` when elaborating terms.
Recall that `observing` does not catch `postponeExceptionId`. -/
if lvals.isEmpty && namedArgs.isEmpty && args.isEmpty then
/- Recall that elabAppFn is used for elaborating atomics terms **and** choice nodes that may contain
arbitrary terms. If they are not being used as a function, we should elaborate using the expectedType. -/
let s ← observing do
if overloaded then
elabTermEnsuringType f expectedType? catchPostpone
else
elabTerm f expectedType?
return acc.push s
else
let s ← observing do
let f ← elabTerm f none catchPostpone
let e ← elabAppLVals f lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
if overloaded then ensureHasType expectedType? e else return e
return acc.push s
/-- Return the successful candidates. Recall we have Syntax `choice` nodes and overloaded symbols when we open multiple namespaces. -/
private def getSuccesses (candidates : Array (TermElabResult Expr)) : TermElabM (Array (TermElabResult Expr)) := do
let r₁ := candidates.filter fun | EStateM.Result.ok .. => true | _ => false
if r₁.size ≤ 1 then return r₁
let r₂ ← candidates.filterM fun
| .ok e s => do
if e.isMVar then
/- Make sure `e` is not a delayed coercion.
Recall that coercion insertion may be delayed when the type and expected type contains
metavariables that block TC resolution.
When processing overloaded notation, we disallow delayed coercions at `e`. -/
try
s.restore
synthesizeSyntheticMVars -- Tries to process pending coercions (and elaboration tasks)
let e ← instantiateMVars e
if e.isMVar then
/- If `e` is still a metavariable, and its `SyntheticMVarDecl` is a coercion, we discard this solution -/
if let some synDecl ← getSyntheticMVarDecl? e.mvarId! then
if synDecl.kind matches SyntheticMVarKind.coe .. then
return false
catch _ =>
-- If `synthesizeSyntheticMVars` failed, we just eliminate the candidate.
return false
return true
| _ => return false
if r₂.size == 0 then return r₁ else return r₂
/--
Throw an error message that describes why each possible interpretation for the overloaded notation and symbols did not work.
We use a nested error message to aggregate the exceptions produced by each failure.
-/
private def mergeFailures (failures : Array (TermElabResult Expr)) : TermElabM α := do
let exs := failures.map fun | .error ex _ => ex | _ => unreachable!
throwErrorWithNestedErrors "overloaded" exs
private def elabAppAux (f : Syntax) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (ellipsis : Bool) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let candidates ← elabAppFn f [] namedArgs args expectedType? (explicit := false) (ellipsis := ellipsis) (overloaded := false) #[]
if candidates.size == 1 then
applyResult candidates[0]!
else
let successes ← getSuccesses candidates
if successes.size == 1 then
applyResult successes[0]!
else if successes.size > 1 then
let msgs : Array MessageData ← successes.mapM fun success => do
match success with
| .ok e s => withMCtx s.meta.meta.mctx <| withEnv s.meta.core.env do addMessageContext m!"{e} : {← inferType e}"
| _ => unreachable!
throwErrorAt f "ambiguous, possible interpretations {toMessageList msgs}"
else
withRef f <| mergeFailures candidates
/--
We annotate recursive applications with their `Syntax` node to make sure we can produce error messages with
correct position information at `WF` and `Structural`.
-/
-- TODO: It is overkill to store the whole `Syntax` object, and we have to make sure we erase it later.
-- We should store only the position information in the future.
-- Recall that we will need to have a compact way of storing position information in the future anyway, if we
-- want to support debugging information
private def annotateIfRec (stx : Syntax) (e : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
if (← read).saveRecAppSyntax then
let resultFn := e.getAppFn
if resultFn.isFVar then
let localDecl ← resultFn.fvarId!.getDecl
if localDecl.isAuxDecl then
return mkRecAppWithSyntax e stx
return e
@[builtinTermElab app] def elabApp : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
universeConstraintsCheckpoint do
let (f, namedArgs, args, ellipsis) ← expandApp stx
annotateIfRec stx (← elabAppAux f namedArgs args (ellipsis := ellipsis) expectedType?)
private def elabAtom : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
annotateIfRec stx (← elabAppAux stx #[] #[] (ellipsis := false) expectedType?)
@[builtinTermElab ident] def elabIdent : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab namedPattern] def elabNamedPattern : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab dotIdent] def elabDotIdent : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab explicitUniv] def elabExplicitUniv : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab pipeProj] def elabPipeProj : TermElab
| `($e |>.$f $args*), expectedType? =>
universeConstraintsCheckpoint do
let (namedArgs, args, ellipsis) ← expandArgs args
elabAppAux (← `($e |>.$f)) namedArgs args (ellipsis := ellipsis) expectedType?
| _, _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab explicit] def elabExplicit : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
match stx with
| `(@$_:ident) => elabAtom stx expectedType? -- Recall that `elabApp` also has support for `@`
| `(@$_:ident.{$_us,*}) => elabAtom stx expectedType?
| `(@($t)) => elabTerm t expectedType? (implicitLambda := false) -- `@` is being used just to disable implicit lambdas
| `(@$t) => elabTerm t expectedType? (implicitLambda := false) -- `@` is being used just to disable implicit lambdas
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab choice] def elabChoice : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab proj] def elabProj : TermElab := elabAtom
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Elab.app
end Lean.Elab.Term
|
cfd89e188c7201f7c51092ddfbda3a89c3d1f067 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/algebraic_topology/dold_kan/p_infty.lean | bfdcca8a76d360f10a7c058db206b9db621851c0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,929 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.projections
import category_theory.idempotents.functor_categories
import category_theory.idempotents.functor_extension
/-!
# Construction of the projection `P_infty` for the Dold-Kan correspondence
TODO (@joelriou) continue adding the various files referenced below
In this file, we construct the projection `P_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` by passing
to the limit the projections `P q` defined in `projections.lean`. This
projection is a critical tool in this formalisation of the Dold-Kan correspondence,
because in the case of abelian categories, `P_infty` corresponds to the
projection on the normalized Moore subcomplex, with kernel the degenerate subcomplex.
(See `equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof.)
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.category
open category_theory.preadditive
open category_theory.simplicial_object
open category_theory.idempotents
open opposite
open_locale simplicial dold_kan
noncomputable theory
namespace algebraic_topology
namespace dold_kan
variables {C : Type*} [category C] [preadditive C] {X : simplicial_object C}
lemma P_is_eventually_constant {q n : ℕ} (hqn : n ≤ q) :
((P (q+1)).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _ ) = (P q).f n :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp only [P_f_0_eq], },
{ unfold P,
simp only [add_right_eq_self, comp_add, homological_complex.comp_f,
homological_complex.add_f_apply, comp_id],
exact (higher_faces_vanish.of_P q n).comp_Hσ_eq_zero
(nat.succ_le_iff.mp hqn), },
end
lemma Q_is_eventually_constant {q n : ℕ} (hqn : n ≤ q) :
((Q (q+1)).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _ ) = (Q q).f n :=
by simp only [Q, homological_complex.sub_f_apply, P_is_eventually_constant hqn]
/-- The endomorphism `P_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` obtained from the `P q` by passing to the limit. -/
def P_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X] := chain_complex.of_hom _ _ _ _ _ _
(λ n, ((P n).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _ ))
(λ n, by simpa only [← P_is_eventually_constant (show n ≤ n, by refl),
alternating_face_map_complex.obj_d_eq] using (P (n+1)).comm (n+1) n)
@[simp]
lemma P_infty_f_0 : (P_infty.f 0 : X _[0] ⟶ X _[0]) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
lemma P_infty_f (n : ℕ) : (P_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ X _[n] ) = (P n).f n := rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_f_naturality (n : ℕ) {X Y : simplicial_object C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f.app (op [n]) ≫ P_infty.f n = P_infty.f n ≫ f.app (op [n]) :=
P_f_naturality n n f
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_f_idem (n : ℕ) :
(P_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) ≫ (P_infty.f n) = P_infty.f n :=
by simp only [P_infty_f, P_f_idem]
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_idem : (P_infty : K[X] ⟶ _) ≫ P_infty = P_infty :=
by { ext n, exact P_infty_f_idem n, }
variable (C)
/-- `P_infty` induces a natural transformation, i.e. an endomorphism of
the functor `alternating_face_map_complex C`. -/
@[simps]
def nat_trans_P_infty :
alternating_face_map_complex C ⟶ alternating_face_map_complex C :=
{ app := λ _, P_infty,
naturality' := λ X Y f, by { ext n, exact P_infty_f_naturality n f, }, }
/-- The natural transformation in each degree that is induced by `nat_trans_P_infty`. -/
@[simps]
def nat_trans_P_infty_f (n : ℕ) :=
nat_trans_P_infty C ◫ 𝟙 (homological_complex.eval _ _ n)
variable {C}
@[simp]
lemma map_P_infty_f {D : Type*} [category D] [preadditive D]
(G : C ⥤ D) [G.additive] (X : simplicial_object C) (n : ℕ) :
(P_infty : K[((whiskering C D).obj G).obj X] ⟶ _).f n =
G.map ((P_infty : alternating_face_map_complex.obj X ⟶ _).f n) :=
by simp only [P_infty_f, map_P]
/-- Given an object `Y : karoubi (simplicial_object C)`, this lemma
computes `P_infty` for the associated object in `simplicial_object (karoubi C)`
in terms of `P_infty` for `Y.X : simplicial_object C` and `Y.p`. -/
lemma karoubi_P_infty_f {Y : karoubi (simplicial_object C)} (n : ℕ) :
((P_infty : K[(karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).obj Y] ⟶ _).f n).f =
Y.p.app (op [n]) ≫ (P_infty : K[Y.X] ⟶ _).f n :=
begin
-- We introduce P_infty endomorphisms P₁, P₂, P₃, P₄ on various objects Y₁, Y₂, Y₃, Y₄.
let Y₁ := (karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).obj Y,
let Y₂ := Y.X,
let Y₃ := (((whiskering _ _).obj (to_karoubi C)).obj Y.X),
let Y₄ := (karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).obj ((to_karoubi _).obj Y.X),
let P₁ : K[Y₁] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
let P₂ : K[Y₂] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
let P₃ : K[Y₃] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
let P₄ : K[Y₄] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
-- The statement of lemma relates P₁ and P₂.
change (P₁.f n).f = Y.p.app (op [n]) ≫ P₂.f n,
-- The proof proceeds by obtaining relations h₃₂, h₄₃, h₁₄.
have h₃₂ : (P₃.f n).f = P₂.f n := karoubi.hom_ext.mp (map_P_infty_f (to_karoubi C) Y₂ n),
have h₄₃ : P₄.f n = P₃.f n,
{ have h := functor.congr_obj (to_karoubi_comp_karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _) Y₂,
simp only [← nat_trans_P_infty_f_app],
congr', },
let τ₁ := 𝟙 (karoubi_functor_category_embedding (simplex_categoryᵒᵖ) C),
let τ₂ := nat_trans_P_infty_f (karoubi C) n,
let τ := τ₁ ◫ τ₂,
have h₁₄ := idempotents.nat_trans_eq τ Y,
dsimp [τ, τ₁, τ₂, nat_trans_P_infty_f] at h₁₄,
rw [id_comp, id_comp, comp_id, comp_id] at h₁₄,
/- We use the three equalities h₃₂, h₄₃, h₁₄. -/
rw [← h₃₂, ← h₄₃, h₁₄],
simp only [karoubi_functor_category_embedding.map_app_f, karoubi.decomp_id_p_f,
karoubi.decomp_id_i_f, karoubi.comp],
let π : Y₄ ⟶ Y₄ := (to_karoubi _ ⋙ karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).map Y.p,
have eq := karoubi.hom_ext.mp (P_infty_f_naturality n π),
simp only [karoubi.comp] at eq,
dsimp [π] at eq,
rw [← eq, reassoc_of (app_idem Y (op [n]))],
end
end dold_kan
end algebraic_topology
|
1739a5b427166521cfff74bfab3e9743cf306a14 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/num_bug2.lean | b9c53b3aa1d07534f35c8b243050d8dbc818233a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 373 | lean | import algebra.ring data.num
open algebra
variable A : Type
variable s : ring A
variable H0 : 0 = (0:A) -- since algebra defines notation '0' it should have precedence over num
variable H1 : 1 = (1:A) -- since algebra defines notation '1' it should have precedence over num
example : has_zero.zero A = has_zero.zero A :=
H0
example : has_one.one A = has_one.one A :=
H1
|
b827c23bea6cf9afbf9ed23a01165168c5eddead | ba4794a0deca1d2aaa68914cd285d77880907b5c | /src/mynat/definition.lean | 0aeb2d7885da2d1defbe94a5c0bd94495c352f34 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/natural_number_game | c7c00aa1f6a95004286fd456ed13cf6e113159ce | 9d09925424da9f6275e6cfe427c8bcf12bb0944f | refs/heads/master | 1,600,715,773,528 | 1,573,910,462,000 | 1,573,910,462,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 912 | lean | import tactic.structure_helper
import tactic.less_leaky
/-
mynat/definition.lean -- definition of mynat.
Supplies:
constants zero : mynat and one : mynat
function S : mynat → mynat
notation 0 for zero and 1 for one.
The below code will be *invisible to the player*
-/
-- definition of "the natural numbers"
inductive mynat
| zero : mynat
| succ (n : mynat) : mynat
namespace mynat
instance : has_zero mynat := ⟨mynat.zero⟩
@[leakage] theorem mynat_zero_eq_zero : mynat.zero = 0 := rfl
def one : mynat := succ 0
instance : has_one mynat := ⟨mynat.one⟩
theorem one_eq_succ_zero : 1 = succ 0 := rfl
lemma zero_ne_succ (m : mynat) : (0 : mynat) ≠ succ m := λ h, by cases h
lemma succ_inj {m n : mynat} (h : succ m = succ n) : m = n := by cases h; refl
end mynat
theorem ne_iff_implies_false ⦃a b : mynat⦄ :
a ≠ b ↔ (a = b) → false := iff.rfl
attribute [symm] ne.symm
|
255bd5c9958c749aa5b9d86015e4d90b9db3d192 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebraic_topology/dold_kan/p_infty.lean | 9cd1e7881ba99675aacd44978425014cae41fc72 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,844 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.projections
import category_theory.idempotents.functor_categories
import category_theory.idempotents.functor_extension
/-!
# Construction of the projection `P_infty` for the Dold-Kan correspondence
TODO (@joelriou) continue adding the various files referenced below
In this file, we construct the projection `P_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` by passing
to the limit the projections `P q` defined in `projections.lean`. This
projection is a critical tool in this formalisation of the Dold-Kan correspondence,
because in the case of abelian categories, `P_infty` corresponds to the
projection on the normalized Moore subcomplex, with kernel the degenerate subcomplex.
(See `equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof.)
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.category
open category_theory.preadditive
open category_theory.simplicial_object
open category_theory.idempotents
open opposite
open_locale simplicial dold_kan
noncomputable theory
namespace algebraic_topology
namespace dold_kan
variables {C : Type*} [category C] [preadditive C] {X : simplicial_object C}
lemma P_is_eventually_constant {q n : ℕ} (hqn : n ≤ q) :
((P (q+1)).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _ ) = (P q).f n :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp only [P_f_0_eq], },
{ unfold P,
simp only [add_right_eq_self, comp_add, homological_complex.comp_f,
homological_complex.add_f_apply, comp_id],
exact (higher_faces_vanish.of_P q n).comp_Hσ_eq_zero
(nat.succ_le_iff.mp hqn), },
end
lemma Q_is_eventually_constant {q n : ℕ} (hqn : n ≤ q) :
((Q (q+1)).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _ ) = (Q q).f n :=
by simp only [Q, homological_complex.sub_f_apply, P_is_eventually_constant hqn]
/-- The endomorphism `P_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` obtained from the `P q` by passing to the limit. -/
def P_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X] := chain_complex.of_hom _ _ _ _ _ _
(λ n, ((P n).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _ ))
(λ n, by simpa only [← P_is_eventually_constant (show n ≤ n, by refl),
alternating_face_map_complex.obj_d_eq] using (P (n+1)).comm (n+1) n)
/-- The endomorphism `Q_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` obtained from the `Q q` by passing to the limit. -/
def Q_infty : K[X] ⟶ K[X] := 𝟙 _ - P_infty
@[simp]
lemma P_infty_f_0 : (P_infty.f 0 : X _[0] ⟶ X _[0]) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
lemma P_infty_f (n : ℕ) : (P_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ X _[n] ) = (P n).f n := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Q_infty_f_0 : (Q_infty.f 0 : X _[0] ⟶ X _[0]) = 0 :=
by { dsimp [Q_infty], simp only [sub_self], }
lemma Q_infty_f (n : ℕ) : (Q_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ X _[n] ) = (Q n).f n := rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_f_naturality (n : ℕ) {X Y : simplicial_object C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f.app (op [n]) ≫ P_infty.f n = P_infty.f n ≫ f.app (op [n]) :=
P_f_naturality n n f
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Q_infty_f_naturality (n : ℕ) {X Y : simplicial_object C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f.app (op [n]) ≫ Q_infty.f n = Q_infty.f n ≫ f.app (op [n]) :=
Q_f_naturality n n f
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_f_idem (n : ℕ) :
(P_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) ≫ (P_infty.f n) = P_infty.f n :=
by simp only [P_infty_f, P_f_idem]
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_idem : (P_infty : K[X] ⟶ _) ≫ P_infty = P_infty :=
by { ext n, exact P_infty_f_idem n, }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Q_infty_f_idem (n : ℕ) :
(Q_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) ≫ (Q_infty.f n) = Q_infty.f n :=
Q_f_idem _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Q_infty_idem : (Q_infty : K[X] ⟶ _) ≫ Q_infty = Q_infty :=
by { ext n, exact Q_infty_f_idem n, }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_f_comp_Q_infty_f (n : ℕ) :
(P_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) ≫ Q_infty.f n = 0 :=
begin
dsimp only [Q_infty],
simp only [homological_complex.sub_f_apply, homological_complex.id_f, comp_sub, comp_id,
P_infty_f_idem, sub_self],
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma P_infty_comp_Q_infty :
(P_infty : K[X] ⟶ _) ≫ Q_infty = 0 :=
by { ext n, apply P_infty_f_comp_Q_infty_f, }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Q_infty_f_comp_P_infty_f (n : ℕ) :
(Q_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) ≫ P_infty.f n = 0 :=
begin
dsimp only [Q_infty],
simp only [homological_complex.sub_f_apply, homological_complex.id_f, sub_comp, id_comp,
P_infty_f_idem, sub_self],
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Q_infty_comp_P_infty :
(Q_infty : K[X] ⟶ _) ≫ P_infty = 0 :=
by { ext n, apply Q_infty_f_comp_P_infty_f, }
@[simp]
lemma P_infty_add_Q_infty :
(P_infty : K[X] ⟶ _) + Q_infty = 𝟙 _ :=
by { dsimp only [Q_infty], simp only [add_sub_cancel'_right], }
lemma P_infty_f_add_Q_infty_f (n : ℕ) :
(P_infty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ _ ) + Q_infty.f n = 𝟙 _ :=
homological_complex.congr_hom (P_infty_add_Q_infty) n
variable (C)
/-- `P_infty` induces a natural transformation, i.e. an endomorphism of
the functor `alternating_face_map_complex C`. -/
@[simps]
def nat_trans_P_infty :
alternating_face_map_complex C ⟶ alternating_face_map_complex C :=
{ app := λ _, P_infty,
naturality' := λ X Y f, by { ext n, exact P_infty_f_naturality n f, }, }
/-- The natural transformation in each degree that is induced by `nat_trans_P_infty`. -/
@[simps]
def nat_trans_P_infty_f (n : ℕ) :=
nat_trans_P_infty C ◫ 𝟙 (homological_complex.eval _ _ n)
variable {C}
@[simp]
lemma map_P_infty_f {D : Type*} [category D] [preadditive D]
(G : C ⥤ D) [G.additive] (X : simplicial_object C) (n : ℕ) :
(P_infty : K[((whiskering C D).obj G).obj X] ⟶ _).f n =
G.map ((P_infty : alternating_face_map_complex.obj X ⟶ _).f n) :=
by simp only [P_infty_f, map_P]
/-- Given an object `Y : karoubi (simplicial_object C)`, this lemma
computes `P_infty` for the associated object in `simplicial_object (karoubi C)`
in terms of `P_infty` for `Y.X : simplicial_object C` and `Y.p`. -/
lemma karoubi_P_infty_f {Y : karoubi (simplicial_object C)} (n : ℕ) :
((P_infty : K[(karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).obj Y] ⟶ _).f n).f =
Y.p.app (op [n]) ≫ (P_infty : K[Y.X] ⟶ _).f n :=
begin
-- We introduce P_infty endomorphisms P₁, P₂, P₃, P₄ on various objects Y₁, Y₂, Y₃, Y₄.
let Y₁ := (karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).obj Y,
let Y₂ := Y.X,
let Y₃ := (((whiskering _ _).obj (to_karoubi C)).obj Y.X),
let Y₄ := (karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).obj ((to_karoubi _).obj Y.X),
let P₁ : K[Y₁] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
let P₂ : K[Y₂] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
let P₃ : K[Y₃] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
let P₄ : K[Y₄] ⟶ _ := P_infty,
-- The statement of lemma relates P₁ and P₂.
change (P₁.f n).f = Y.p.app (op [n]) ≫ P₂.f n,
-- The proof proceeds by obtaining relations h₃₂, h₄₃, h₁₄.
have h₃₂ : (P₃.f n).f = P₂.f n := karoubi.hom_ext.mp (map_P_infty_f (to_karoubi C) Y₂ n),
have h₄₃ : P₄.f n = P₃.f n,
{ have h := functor.congr_obj (to_karoubi_comp_karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _) Y₂,
simp only [← nat_trans_P_infty_f_app],
congr', },
let τ₁ := 𝟙 (karoubi_functor_category_embedding (simplex_categoryᵒᵖ) C),
let τ₂ := nat_trans_P_infty_f (karoubi C) n,
let τ := τ₁ ◫ τ₂,
have h₁₄ := idempotents.nat_trans_eq τ Y,
dsimp [τ, τ₁, τ₂, nat_trans_P_infty_f] at h₁₄,
rw [id_comp, id_comp, comp_id, comp_id] at h₁₄,
/- We use the three equalities h₃₂, h₄₃, h₁₄. -/
rw [← h₃₂, ← h₄₃, h₁₄],
simp only [karoubi_functor_category_embedding.map_app_f, karoubi.decomp_id_p_f,
karoubi.decomp_id_i_f, karoubi.comp_f],
let π : Y₄ ⟶ Y₄ := (to_karoubi _ ⋙ karoubi_functor_category_embedding _ _).map Y.p,
have eq := karoubi.hom_ext.mp (P_infty_f_naturality n π),
simp only [karoubi.comp_f] at eq,
dsimp [π] at eq,
rw [← eq, reassoc_of (app_idem Y (op [n]))],
end
end dold_kan
end algebraic_topology
|
50b185976a541c1f14270ba9e4d22c347a5f111d | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/data/mv_polynomial/equiv.lean | a1158863d41a6e300b78fb387bc8fc2e43df2069 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,812 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.mv_polynomial.rename
import data.equiv.fin
/-!
# Equivalences between polynomial rings
This file establishes a number of equivalences between polynomial rings,
based on equivalences between the underlying types.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[comm_semiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `mv_polynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : mv_polynomial σ R`
## Tags
equivalence, isomorphism, morphism, ring hom, hom
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators
open set function finsupp add_monoid_algebra
universes u v w x
variables {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
namespace mv_polynomial
variables {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section equiv
variables (R) [comm_semiring R]
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables and the ground ring. -/
@[simps]
def pempty_ring_equiv : mv_polynomial pempty R ≃+* R :=
{ to_fun := mv_polynomial.eval₂ (ring_hom.id _) $ pempty.elim,
inv_fun := C,
left_inv := is_id (C.comp (eval₂_hom (ring_hom.id _) pempty.elim))
(assume a : R, by { dsimp, rw [eval₂_C], refl }) (assume a, a.elim),
right_inv := λ r, eval₂_C _ _ _,
map_mul' := λ _ _, eval₂_mul _ _,
map_add' := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _ }
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables and the ground ring. -/
@[simps]
def pempty_alg_equiv : mv_polynomial pempty R ≃ₐ[R] R :=
{ to_fun := mv_polynomial.eval₂ (ring_hom.id _) $ pempty.elim,
inv_fun := C,
left_inv := is_id (C.comp (eval₂_hom (ring_hom.id _) pempty.elim))
(assume a : R, by { dsimp, rw [eval₂_C], refl }) (assume a, a.elim),
right_inv := λ r, eval₂_C _ _ _,
map_mul' := λ _ _, eval₂_mul _ _,
map_add' := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _,
commutes' := λ _, by rw [mv_polynomial.algebra_map_eq]; simp }
/--
The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a single variable and
polynomials over the ground ring.
-/
@[simps]
def punit_ring_equiv : mv_polynomial punit R ≃+* polynomial R :=
{ to_fun := eval₂ polynomial.C (λu:punit, polynomial.X),
inv_fun := polynomial.eval₂ mv_polynomial.C (X punit.star),
left_inv :=
begin
let f : polynomial R →+* mv_polynomial punit R :=
ring_hom.of (polynomial.eval₂ mv_polynomial.C (X punit.star)),
let g : mv_polynomial punit R →+* polynomial R :=
ring_hom.of (eval₂ polynomial.C (λu:punit, polynomial.X)),
show ∀ p, f.comp g p = p,
apply is_id,
{ assume a, dsimp, rw [eval₂_C, polynomial.eval₂_C] },
{ rintros ⟨⟩, dsimp, rw [eval₂_X, polynomial.eval₂_X] }
end,
right_inv := assume p, polynomial.induction_on p
(assume a, by rw [polynomial.eval₂_C, mv_polynomial.eval₂_C])
(assume p q hp hq, by rw [polynomial.eval₂_add, mv_polynomial.eval₂_add, hp, hq])
(assume p n hp,
by rw [polynomial.eval₂_mul, polynomial.eval₂_pow, polynomial.eval₂_X, polynomial.eval₂_C,
eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_pow, eval₂_X]),
map_mul' := λ _ _, eval₂_mul _ _,
map_add' := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _ }
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials induced by an equivalence of the variables. -/
@[simps]
def ring_equiv_of_equiv (e : S₁ ≃ S₂) : mv_polynomial S₁ R ≃+* mv_polynomial S₂ R :=
{ to_fun := rename e,
inv_fun := rename e.symm,
left_inv := λ p, by simp only [rename_rename, (∘), e.symm_apply_apply]; exact rename_id p,
right_inv := λ p, by simp only [rename_rename, (∘), e.apply_symm_apply]; exact rename_id p,
map_mul' := (rename e).map_mul,
map_add' := (rename e).map_add }
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials induced by an equivalence of the variables. -/
@[simps]
def alg_equiv_of_equiv (e : S₁ ≃ S₂) : mv_polynomial S₁ R ≃ₐ[R] mv_polynomial S₂ R :=
{ to_fun := rename e,
inv_fun := rename e.symm,
left_inv := λ p, by simp only [rename_rename, (∘), e.symm_apply_apply]; exact rename_id p,
right_inv := λ p, by simp only [rename_rename, (∘), e.apply_symm_apply]; exact rename_id p,
commutes' := λ p, by simp only [alg_hom.commutes],
.. rename e }
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials induced by a ring isomorphism of the ground ring. -/
@[simps]
def ring_equiv_congr [comm_semiring S₂] (e : R ≃+* S₂) : mv_polynomial S₁ R ≃+* mv_polynomial S₁ S₂ :=
{ to_fun := map (e : R →+* S₂),
inv_fun := map (e.symm : S₂ →+* R),
left_inv := assume p,
have (e.symm : S₂ →+* R).comp (e : R →+* S₂) = ring_hom.id _,
{ ext a, exact e.symm_apply_apply a },
by simp only [map_map, this, map_id],
right_inv := assume p,
have (e : R →+* S₂).comp (e.symm : S₂ →+* R) = ring_hom.id _,
{ ext a, exact e.apply_symm_apply a },
by simp only [map_map, this, map_id],
map_mul' := ring_hom.map_mul _,
map_add' := ring_hom.map_add _ }
section
variables (S₁ S₂ S₃)
/--
The function from multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
to multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficents in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
See `sum_ring_equiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def sum_to_iter : mv_polynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R →+* mv_polynomial S₁ (mv_polynomial S₂ R) :=
eval₂_hom (C.comp C) (λbc, sum.rec_on bc X (C ∘ X))
instance is_semiring_hom_sum_to_iter : is_semiring_hom (sum_to_iter R S₁ S₂) :=
eval₂.is_semiring_hom _ _
@[simp]
lemma sum_to_iter_C (a : R) : sum_to_iter R S₁ S₂ (C a) = C (C a) :=
eval₂_C _ _ a
@[simp]
lemma sum_to_iter_Xl (b : S₁) : sum_to_iter R S₁ S₂ (X (sum.inl b)) = X b :=
eval₂_X _ _ (sum.inl b)
@[simp]
lemma sum_to_iter_Xr (c : S₂) : sum_to_iter R S₁ S₂ (X (sum.inr c)) = C (X c) :=
eval₂_X _ _ (sum.inr c)
/--
The function from multivariable polynomials in one type,
with coefficents in multivariable polynomials in another type,
to multivariable polynomials in the sum of the two types.
See `sum_ring_equiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def iter_to_sum : mv_polynomial S₁ (mv_polynomial S₂ R) →+* mv_polynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R :=
eval₂_hom (ring_hom.of (eval₂ C (X ∘ sum.inr))) (X ∘ sum.inl)
lemma iter_to_sum_C_C (a : R) : iter_to_sum R S₁ S₂ (C (C a)) = C a :=
eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (C a)) (eval₂_C _ _ _)
lemma iter_to_sum_X (b : S₁) : iter_to_sum R S₁ S₂ (X b) = X (sum.inl b) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
lemma iter_to_sum_C_X (c : S₂) : iter_to_sum R S₁ S₂ (C (X c)) = X (sum.inr c) :=
eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (X c)) (eval₂_X _ _ _)
/-- A helper function for `sum_ring_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def mv_polynomial_equiv_mv_polynomial [comm_semiring S₃]
(f : mv_polynomial S₁ R →+* mv_polynomial S₂ S₃)
(g : mv_polynomial S₂ S₃ →+* mv_polynomial S₁ R)
(hfgC : ∀a, f (g (C a)) = C a)
(hfgX : ∀n, f (g (X n)) = X n)
(hgfC : ∀a, g (f (C a)) = C a)
(hgfX : ∀n, g (f (X n)) = X n) :
mv_polynomial S₁ R ≃+* mv_polynomial S₂ S₃ :=
{ to_fun := f, inv_fun := g,
left_inv := is_id (ring_hom.comp _ _) hgfC hgfX,
right_inv := is_id (ring_hom.comp _ _) hfgC hfgX,
map_mul' := f.map_mul,
map_add' := f.map_add }
/--
The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
and multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficents in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
-/
def sum_ring_equiv : mv_polynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R ≃+* mv_polynomial S₁ (mv_polynomial S₂ R) :=
begin
apply @mv_polynomial_equiv_mv_polynomial R (S₁ ⊕ S₂) _ _ _ _
(sum_to_iter R S₁ S₂) (iter_to_sum R S₁ S₂),
{ assume p,
convert hom_eq_hom ((sum_to_iter R S₁ S₂).comp ((iter_to_sum R S₁ S₂).comp C)) C _ _ p,
{ assume a, dsimp, rw [iter_to_sum_C_C R S₁ S₂, sum_to_iter_C R S₁ S₂] },
{ assume c, dsimp, rw [iter_to_sum_C_X R S₁ S₂, sum_to_iter_Xr R S₁ S₂] } },
{ assume b, rw [iter_to_sum_X R S₁ S₂, sum_to_iter_Xl R S₁ S₂] },
{ assume a, rw [sum_to_iter_C R S₁ S₂, iter_to_sum_C_C R S₁ S₂] },
{ assume n, cases n with b c,
{ rw [sum_to_iter_Xl, iter_to_sum_X] },
{ rw [sum_to_iter_Xr, iter_to_sum_C_X] } },
end
/--
The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `option S₁` and
polynomials with coefficients in `mv_polynomial S₁ R`.
-/
def option_equiv_left : mv_polynomial (option S₁) R ≃+* polynomial (mv_polynomial S₁ R) :=
(ring_equiv_of_equiv R $ (equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit.{0} S₁).trans (equiv.sum_comm _ _)).trans $
(sum_ring_equiv R _ _).trans $
punit_ring_equiv _
/--
The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `option S₁` and
multivariable polynomials with coefficients in polynomials.
-/
def option_equiv_right : mv_polynomial (option S₁) R ≃+* mv_polynomial S₁ (polynomial R) :=
(ring_equiv_of_equiv R $ equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit.{0} S₁).trans $
(sum_ring_equiv R S₁ unit).trans $
ring_equiv_congr (mv_polynomial unit R) (punit_ring_equiv R)
/--
The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `fin (n + 1)` and
polynomials over multivariable polynomials in `fin n`.
-/
def fin_succ_equiv (n : ℕ) :
mv_polynomial (fin (n + 1)) R ≃+* polynomial (mv_polynomial (fin n) R) :=
(ring_equiv_of_equiv R (fin_succ_equiv n)).trans
(option_equiv_left R (fin n))
lemma fin_succ_equiv_eq (n : ℕ) :
(fin_succ_equiv R n : mv_polynomial (fin (n + 1)) R →+* polynomial (mv_polynomial (fin n) R)) =
eval₂_hom (polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* mv_polynomial (fin n) R))
(λ i : fin (n+1), fin.cases polynomial.X (λ k, polynomial.C (X k)) i) :=
begin
apply ring_hom_ext,
{ intro r,
dsimp [ring_equiv.coe_ring_hom, fin_succ_equiv, option_equiv_left, sum_ring_equiv],
simp only [sum_to_iter_C, eval₂_C, rename_C, ring_hom.coe_comp] },
{ intro i,
dsimp [ring_equiv.coe_ring_hom, fin_succ_equiv, option_equiv_left, sum_ring_equiv, _root_.fin_succ_equiv],
by_cases hi : i = 0,
{ simp only [hi, fin.cases_zero, sum.swap, rename_X, equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_none,
equiv.sum_comm_apply, comp_app, sum_to_iter_Xl, eval₂_X] },
{ rw [← fin.succ_pred i hi],
simp only [rename_X, equiv.sum_comm_apply, comp_app, eval₂_X,
equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_some, sum.swap, fin.cases_succ, sum_to_iter_Xr, eval₂_C] } }
end
@[simp] lemma fin_succ_equiv_apply (n : ℕ) (p : mv_polynomial (fin (n + 1)) R) :
fin_succ_equiv R n p =
eval₂_hom (polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* mv_polynomial (fin n) R))
(λ i : fin (n+1), fin.cases polynomial.X (λ k, polynomial.C (X k)) i) p :=
by { rw ← fin_succ_equiv_eq, refl }
lemma fin_succ_equiv_comp_C_eq_C {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R] (n : ℕ) :
((mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv R n).symm.to_ring_hom).comp
((polynomial.C).comp (mv_polynomial.C))
= (mv_polynomial.C : R →+* mv_polynomial (fin n.succ) R) :=
begin
refine ring_hom.ext (λ x, _),
rw ring_hom.comp_apply,
refine (mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv R n).injective
(trans ((mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv R n).apply_symm_apply _) _),
simp only [mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_apply, mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_C],
end
end
end equiv
end mv_polynomial
|
213bd1b7c65687149f7c3d7b75aa5a610c59e345 | 1b8f093752ba748c5ca0083afef2959aaa7dace5 | /src/category_theory/universal/monic.lean | bd725f24a9b245f18b340195c048db0322ed6856 | [] | no_license | khoek/lean-category-theory | 7ec4cda9cc64a5a4ffeb84712ac7d020dbbba386 | 63dcb598e9270a3e8b56d1769eb4f825a177cd95 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,251,725,759 | 1,539,344,445,000 | 1,539,344,445,000 | 145,281,070 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,662,376,000 | 1,534,662,376,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 933 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Scott Morrison
import category_theory.limits.equalizers
import category_theory.abelian.monic
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory.universal.monic
universes u v
variables {C : Type u} [category.{u v} C] {X Y Z : C}
structure regular_mono (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(Z : C)
(a b : Y ⟶ Z)
(w : f ≫ a = f ≫ b)
(e : is_equalizer ⟨ ⟨ X ⟩, f, w ⟩)
-- EXERCISE
-- def SplitMonic_implies_RegularMonic
-- {f : Hom X Y}
-- (s : SplitMonic f) : RegularMonic f := sorry
-- EXERCISE
-- def RegularMonic_implies_Monic
-- {f : Hom X Y}
-- (s : RegularMonic f) : Monic f := sorry
structure regular_epi (f : Y ⟶ Z) :=
(X : C)
(a b : X ⟶ Y)
(w : a ≫ f = b ≫ f)
(c : is_coequalizer ⟨ ⟨ Z ⟩, f, w ⟩)
end category_theory.universal.monic |
d1c7dc5cdd16dea7dd31d52bfceff84b226b988d | 21ee31472b6ad765d2d9f8f655301d8b6ad921c2 | /math/leanprover/lean1.lean | 3f750c792a3dc26a06099f54f9dd3043e815d542 | [] | no_license | anandijain/learning | 2229472c40ca651a20cff9c52dabc3e6c3a8aeca | 14c98cb0b89805c74e9e8d1afba7945d69ec4b67 | refs/heads/master | 1,594,406,566,371 | 1,586,458,652,000 | 1,586,458,652,000 | 204,337,259 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 560 | lean | import system.io
open io
def get_file (fn : io char_buffer): io char_buffer :=
fs.read_file "/home/sippycups/learning/math/leanprover/" ++ fn
def hello_world : io unit :=
do s <- get_file,
put_str s.to_string
-- #check (@put_str : string → io unit)
-- #check(@get_line : io string)
#eval hello_world
-- theorem and_com (p q : Prop) : p ∧ q → q ∧ p :=
-- assume hpq : p ∧ q,
-- have hp : p, from and.left hpq,
-- have hq : q, from and.right hpq,
-- show q ∧ p, from and.intro hq hp
-- inductive partial_order (n : nat, q : order) |
de25016e4bfa425f7c6e21c4c634daff51fec706 | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /library/theories/analysis/ivt.lean | 2894a443b305c127d2e5b1c9a494c52f6d437091 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,047 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
The intermediate value theorem.
-/
import .real_limit
open real analysis set classical
noncomputable theory
private definition inter_sup (a b : ℝ) (f : ℝ → ℝ) := sup {x | x < b ∧ f x < 0}
section
parameters {f : ℝ → ℝ} (Hf : continuous f) {a b : ℝ} (Hab : a < b) (Ha : f a < 0) (Hb : f b > 0)
include Hf Ha Hb Hab
private theorem Hinh : ∃ x, x ∈ {x | x < b ∧ f x < 0} := exists.intro a (and.intro Hab Ha)
private theorem Hmem : ∀ x, x ∈ {x | x < b ∧ f x < 0} → x ≤ b := λ x Hx, le_of_lt (and.left Hx)
private theorem Hsupleb : inter_sup a b f ≤ b := sup_le (Hinh) Hmem
local notation 2 := of_num 1 + of_num 1
private theorem ex_delta_lt {x : ℝ} (Hx : f x < 0) (Hxb : x < b) : ∃ δ : ℝ, δ > 0 ∧ x + δ < b ∧ f (x + δ) < 0 :=
begin
let Hcont := neg_on_nbhd_of_cts_of_neg Hf Hx,
cases Hcont with δ Hδ,
{cases em (x + δ < b) with Haδ Haδ,
existsi δ / 2,
split,
{exact div_pos_of_pos_of_pos (and.left Hδ) two_pos},
split,
{apply lt.trans,
apply add_lt_add_left,
exact div_two_lt_of_pos (and.left Hδ),
exact Haδ},
{apply and.right Hδ,
krewrite [abs_sub, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, abs_neg,
abs_of_pos (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos (and.left Hδ) two_pos)],
exact div_two_lt_of_pos (and.left Hδ)},
existsi (b - x) / 2,
split,
{apply div_pos_of_pos_of_pos,
exact sub_pos_of_lt Hxb,
exact two_pos},
split,
{apply add_midpoint Hxb},
{apply and.right Hδ,
krewrite [abs_sub, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, abs_neg,
abs_of_pos (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos (sub_pos_of_lt Hxb) two_pos)],
apply lt_of_lt_of_le,
apply div_two_lt_of_pos (sub_pos_of_lt Hxb),
apply sub_left_le_of_le_add,
apply le_of_not_gt Haδ}}
end
private lemma sup_near_b {δ : ℝ} (Hpos : 0 < δ)
(Hgeb : inter_sup a b f + δ / 2 ≥ b) : abs (inter_sup a b f - b) < δ :=
begin
apply abs_lt_of_lt_of_neg_lt,
apply sub_lt_left_of_lt_add,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
apply Hsupleb,
apply lt_add_of_pos_right Hpos,
rewrite neg_sub,
apply sub_lt_left_of_lt_add,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
apply Hgeb,
apply add_lt_add_left,
apply div_two_lt_of_pos Hpos
end
private lemma delta_of_lt (Hflt : f (inter_sup a b f) < 0) :
∃ δ : ℝ, δ > 0 ∧ inter_sup a b f + δ < b ∧ f (inter_sup a b f + δ) < 0 :=
if Hlt : inter_sup a b f < b then ex_delta_lt Hflt Hlt else
begin
let Heq := eq_of_le_of_ge Hsupleb (le_of_not_gt Hlt),
apply absurd Hflt,
apply not_lt_of_ge,
apply le_of_lt,
rewrite Heq,
exact Hb
end
private theorem sup_fn_interval_aux1 : f (inter_sup a b f) ≥ 0 :=
have ¬ f (inter_sup a b f) < 0, from
(suppose f (inter_sup a b f) < 0,
obtain δ Hδ, from delta_of_lt this,
have inter_sup a b f + δ ∈ {x | x < b ∧ f x < 0},
from and.intro (and.left (and.right Hδ)) (and.right (and.right Hδ)),
have ¬ inter_sup a b f < inter_sup a b f + δ,
from not_lt_of_ge (le_sup this Hmem),
show false, from this (lt_add_of_pos_right (and.left Hδ))),
le_of_not_gt this
private theorem sup_fn_interval_aux2 : f (inter_sup a b f) ≤ 0 :=
have ¬ f (inter_sup a b f) > 0, from
(assume Hfsup : f (inter_sup a b f) > 0,
obtain δ Hδ, from pos_on_nbhd_of_cts_of_pos Hf Hfsup,
have ∀ x, x ∈ {x | x < b ∧ f x < 0} → x ≤ inter_sup a b f - δ / 2, from
(take x, assume Hxset : x ∈ {x | x < b ∧ f x < 0},
have ¬ x > inter_sup a b f - δ / 2, from
(assume Hngt,
have Habs : abs (x - inter_sup a b f) < δ, begin
rewrite abs_sub,
apply abs_lt_of_lt_of_neg_lt,
apply sub_lt_of_sub_lt,
apply gt.trans,
exact Hngt,
apply sub_lt_sub_left,
exact div_two_lt_of_pos (and.left Hδ),
rewrite neg_sub,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
rotate 1,
apply and.left Hδ,
apply sub_nonpos_of_le,
apply le_sup,
exact Hxset,
exact Hmem
end,
have f x > 0, from and.right Hδ x Habs,
show false, from (not_lt_of_gt this) (and.right Hxset)),
le_of_not_gt this),
have Hle : inter_sup a b f ≤ inter_sup a b f - δ / 2, from sup_le Hinh this,
show false, from not_le_of_gt
(sub_lt_of_pos _ (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos (and.left Hδ) (two_pos))) Hle),
le_of_not_gt this
private theorem sup_fn_interval : f (inter_sup a b f) = 0 :=
eq_of_le_of_ge sup_fn_interval_aux2 sup_fn_interval_aux1
private theorem intermediate_value_incr_aux2 : ∃ δ : ℝ, δ > 0 ∧ a + δ < b ∧ f (a + δ) < 0 :=
begin
let Hcont := neg_on_nbhd_of_cts_of_neg Hf Ha,
cases Hcont with δ Hδ,
{cases em (a + δ < b) with Haδ Haδ,
existsi δ / 2,
split,
{exact div_pos_of_pos_of_pos (and.left Hδ) two_pos},
split,
{apply lt.trans,
apply add_lt_add_left,
exact div_two_lt_of_pos (and.left Hδ),
exact Haδ},
{apply and.right Hδ,
krewrite [abs_sub, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, abs_neg,
abs_of_pos (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos (and.left Hδ) two_pos)],
exact div_two_lt_of_pos (and.left Hδ)},
existsi (b - a) / 2,
split,
{apply div_pos_of_pos_of_pos,
exact sub_pos_of_lt Hab,
exact two_pos},
split,
{apply add_midpoint Hab},
{apply and.right Hδ,
krewrite [abs_sub, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, abs_neg,
abs_of_pos (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos (sub_pos_of_lt Hab) two_pos)],
apply lt_of_lt_of_le,
apply div_two_lt_of_pos (sub_pos_of_lt Hab),
apply sub_left_le_of_le_add,
apply le_of_not_gt Haδ}}
end
theorem intermediate_value_incr_zero : ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b ∧ f c = 0 :=
begin
existsi inter_sup a b f,
split,
{cases intermediate_value_incr_aux2 with δ Hδ,
apply lt_of_lt_of_le,
apply lt_add_of_pos_right,
exact and.left Hδ,
apply le_sup,
exact and.right Hδ,
intro x Hx,
apply le_of_lt,
exact and.left Hx},
split,
{cases pos_on_nbhd_of_cts_of_pos Hf Hb with δ Hδ,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
rotate 1,
apply sub_lt_of_pos,
exact and.left Hδ,
rotate_right 1,
apply sup_le,
exact exists.intro a (and.intro Hab Ha),
intro x Hx,
apply le_of_not_gt,
intro Hxgt,
have Hxgt' : b - x < δ, from sub_lt_of_sub_lt Hxgt,
krewrite [-(abs_of_pos (sub_pos_of_lt (and.left Hx))) at Hxgt', abs_sub at Hxgt'],
note Hxgt'' := and.right Hδ _ Hxgt',
exact not_lt_of_ge (le_of_lt Hxgt'') (and.right Hx)},
{exact sup_fn_interval}
end
end
theorem intermediate_value_decr_zero {f : ℝ → ℝ} (Hf : continuous f) {a b : ℝ} (Hab : a < b)
(Ha : f a > 0) (Hb : f b < 0) : ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b ∧ f c = 0 :=
begin
have Ha' : - f a < 0, from neg_neg_of_pos Ha,
have Hb' : - f b > 0, from neg_pos_of_neg Hb,
have Hcon : continuous (λ x, - f x), from continuous_neg_of_continuous Hf,
let Hiv := intermediate_value_incr_zero Hcon Hab Ha' Hb',
cases Hiv with c Hc,
existsi c,
split,
exact and.left Hc,
split,
exact and.left (and.right Hc),
apply eq_zero_of_neg_eq_zero,
apply and.right (and.right Hc)
end
theorem intermediate_value_incr {f : ℝ → ℝ} (Hf : continuous f) {a b : ℝ} (Hab : a < b) {v : ℝ}
(Hav : f a < v) (Hbv : f b > v) : ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b ∧ f c = v :=
have Hav' : f a - v < 0, from sub_neg_of_lt Hav,
have Hbv' : f b - v > 0, from sub_pos_of_lt Hbv,
have Hcon : continuous (λ x, f x - v), from continuous_offset_of_continuous Hf _,
have Hiv : ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b ∧ f c - v = 0, from intermediate_value_incr_zero Hcon Hab Hav' Hbv',
obtain c Hc, from Hiv,
exists.intro c
(and.intro (and.left Hc) (and.intro (and.left (and.right Hc)) (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (and.right (and.right Hc)))))
theorem intermediate_value_decr {f : ℝ → ℝ} (Hf : continuous f) {a b : ℝ} (Hab : a < b) {v : ℝ}
(Hav : f a > v) (Hbv : f b < v) : ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b ∧ f c = v :=
have Hav' : f a - v > 0, from sub_pos_of_lt Hav,
have Hbv' : f b - v < 0, from sub_neg_of_lt Hbv,
have Hcon : continuous (λ x, f x - v), from continuous_offset_of_continuous Hf _,
have Hiv : ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b ∧ f c - v = 0, from intermediate_value_decr_zero Hcon Hab Hav' Hbv',
obtain c Hc, from Hiv,
exists.intro c
(and.intro (and.left Hc) (and.intro (and.left (and.right Hc)) (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (and.right (and.right Hc)))))
theorem intermediate_value_incr_weak {f : ℝ → ℝ} (Hf : continuous f) {a b : ℝ} (Hab : a ≤ b) {v : ℝ}
(Hav : f a ≤ v) (Hbv : f b ≥ v) : ∃ c, a ≤ c ∧ c ≤ b ∧ f c = v :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le Hab with Hlt Heq,
cases lt_or_eq_of_le Hav with Hlt' Heq',
cases lt_or_eq_of_le Hbv with Hlt'' Heq'',
cases intermediate_value_incr Hf Hlt Hlt' Hlt'' with c Hc,
cases Hc with Hc1 Hc2,
cases Hc2 with Hc2 Hc3,
existsi c,
repeat (split; apply le_of_lt; assumption),
assumption,
existsi b,
split,
apply le_of_lt,
assumption,
split,
apply le.refl,
rewrite Heq'',
existsi a,
split,
apply le.refl,
split,
apply le_of_lt,
repeat assumption,
existsi a,
split,
apply le.refl,
split,
assumption,
apply eq_of_le_of_ge,
apply Hav,
rewrite Heq,
apply Hbv
end
section roots
private definition sqr_lb (x : ℝ) : ℝ := 0
private theorem sqr_lb_is_lb (x : ℝ) (H : x ≥ 0) : (sqr_lb x) * (sqr_lb x) ≤ x :=
by rewrite [↑sqr_lb, zero_mul]; assumption
private definition sqr_ub (x : ℝ) : ℝ := x + 1
private theorem sqr_ub_is_ub (x : ℝ) (H : x ≥ 0) : (sqr_ub x) * (sqr_ub x) ≥ x :=
begin
rewrite [↑sqr_ub, left_distrib, mul_one, right_distrib, one_mul, {x + 1}add.comm, -*add.assoc],
apply le_add_of_nonneg_left,
repeat apply add_nonneg,
apply mul_nonneg,
repeat assumption,
apply zero_le_one
end
private theorem lb_le_ub (x : ℝ) (H : x ≥ 0) : sqr_lb x ≤ sqr_ub x :=
begin
rewrite [↑sqr_lb, ↑sqr_ub],
apply add_nonneg,
assumption,
apply zero_le_one
end
private lemma sqr_cts : continuous (λ x : ℝ, x * x) := continuous_mul_of_continuous id_continuous id_continuous
definition sqrt (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if H : x ≥ 0 then
some (intermediate_value_incr_weak sqr_cts (lb_le_ub x H) (sqr_lb_is_lb x H) (sqr_ub_is_ub x H))
else 0
theorem sqrt_spec (x : ℝ) (H : x ≥ 0) : sqrt x * sqrt x = x :=
begin
rewrite [↑sqrt, dif_pos H],
note Hs := some_spec
(intermediate_value_incr_weak sqr_cts (lb_le_ub x H) (sqr_lb_is_lb x H) (sqr_ub_is_ub x H)),
cases Hs with Hs1 Hs2,
cases Hs2,
assumption
end
end roots
|
0f632127a58aed4af50ec36f44fd870e86e2e10c | 453dcd7c0d1ef170b0843a81d7d8caedc9741dce | /category/traversable/lemmas.lean | 44ad4da0dfb90b987f83f4ad32adf50466567364 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | amswerdlow/mathlib | 9af77a1f08486d8fa059448ae2d97795bd12ec0c | 27f96e30b9c9bf518341705c99d641c38638dfd0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,200,953,598 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 144,564,700 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,156,197,000 | 1,534,156,197,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,274 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Simon Hudon
Lemmas about traversing collections.
Inspired by:
The Essence of the Iterator Pattern
Jeremy Gibbons and Bruno César dos Santos Oliveira
In Journal of Functional Programming. Vol. 19. No. 3&4. Pages 377−402. 2009.
http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/jeremy.gibbons/publications/iterator.pdf
-/
import tactic.cache
import category.traversable.basic
universe variables u
open is_lawful_traversable
open function (hiding comp)
open functor
attribute [functor_norm] is_lawful_traversable.naturality
namespace traversable
variable {t : Type u → Type u}
variables [traversable t] [is_lawful_traversable t]
variables {G H : Type u → Type u}
variables [applicative G] [is_lawful_applicative G]
variables [applicative H] [is_lawful_applicative H]
variables {α β γ : Type u}
variables g : α → G β
variables h : β → H γ
variables f : β → γ
variables G H
def pure_transformation : applicative_transformation id G :=
begin
refine { F := @pure G _, .. }; intros,
{ refl },
{ simp, refl }
end
variables {G H}
lemma traverse_eq_map_ident (x : t β) :
traverse (id.mk ∘ f) x = id.mk (f <$> x) :=
calc
traverse (id.mk ∘ f) x
= traverse id.mk (f <$> x) : by rw [← traverse_map]
... = (<$>) f <$> x : by simp [id_traverse]; refl
lemma purity (x : t α) :
traverse pure x = (pure x : G (t α)) :=
let η := pure_transformation G in
calc traverse (@pure G _ _) x
= traverse (pure ∘ id.mk) x : rfl
... = traverse (@η _ ∘ id.mk) x : rfl
... = η (traverse id.mk x) : by rw [naturality]
... = η x : by rw [id_traverse]
... = pure x : rfl
lemma id_sequence (x : t α) :
sequence (id.mk <$> x) = id.mk x :=
by simp [sequence,traverse_map,id_traverse]; refl
lemma comp_sequence (x : t (G (H α))) :
sequence (comp.mk <$> x) = comp.mk (sequence <$> sequence x) :=
by simp [sequence,traverse_map]; rw ← comp_traverse; simp [map_id]
lemma naturality' (η : applicative_transformation G H) (x : t (G α)) :
η (sequence x) = sequence (@η _ <$> x) :=
by simp [sequence,naturality,traverse_map]
end traversable
|
16271a2e812a321a9c78f6a9761dea463ee44d26 | 5749d8999a76f3a8fddceca1f6941981e33aaa96 | /src/analysis/complex/polynomial.lean | dfd928da51f09dd64eb52f37493a3a96fc5095d6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jdsalchow/mathlib | 13ab43ef0d0515a17e550b16d09bd14b76125276 | 497e692b946d93906900bb33a51fd243e7649406 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,819,143,348 | 1,580,072,892,000 | 1,580,072,892,000 | 154,287,128 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,281,610,000 | 1,540,281,609,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,972 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.polynomial topology.algebra.polynomial analysis.complex.exponential
open complex polynomial metric filter is_absolute_value set lattice
namespace complex
lemma exists_forall_abs_polynomial_eval_le (p : polynomial ℂ) :
∃ x, ∀ y, (p.eval x).abs ≤ (p.eval y).abs :=
if hp0 : 0 < degree p
then let ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩ := polynomial.tendsto_infinity complex.abs hp0 ((p.eval 0).abs) in
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := (proper_space.compact_ball (0:ℂ) r).exists_forall_le
(set.ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.2 ⟨0, by simp [le_of_lt hr0]⟩)
(continuous_abs.comp p.continuous_eval).continuous_on in
⟨x, λ y, if hy : y.abs ≤ r then hx₂ y $ by simpa [complex.dist_eq] using hy
else le_trans (hx₂ _ (by simp [le_of_lt hr0])) (le_of_lt (hr y (lt_of_not_ge hy)))⟩
else ⟨p.coeff 0, by rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (le_of_not_gt hp0)]; simp⟩
/- The following proof uses the method given at
<https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fundamental+theorem+of+algebra#classical_fta_via_advanced_calculus> -/
/-- The fundamental theorem of algebra. Every non constant complex polynomial
has a root -/
lemma exists_root {f : polynomial ℂ} (hf : 0 < degree f) : ∃ z : ℂ, is_root f z :=
let ⟨z₀, hz₀⟩ := exists_forall_abs_polynomial_eval_le f in
exists.intro z₀ $ by_contradiction $ λ hf0,
have hfX : f - C (f.eval z₀) ≠ 0,
from mt sub_eq_zero.1 (λ h, not_le_of_gt hf (h.symm ▸ degree_C_le)),
let n := root_multiplicity z₀ (f - C (f.eval z₀)) in
let g := (f - C (f.eval z₀)) /ₘ ((X - C z₀) ^ n) in
have hg0 : g.eval z₀ ≠ 0, from eval_div_by_monic_pow_root_multiplicity_ne_zero _ hfX,
have hg : g * (X - C z₀) ^ n = f - C (f.eval z₀),
from div_by_monic_mul_pow_root_multiplicity_eq _ _,
have hn0 : 0 < n, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero $ λ hn0, by simpa [g, hn0] using hg0,
let ⟨δ', hδ'₁, hδ'₂⟩ := continuous_iff.1 (polynomial.continuous_eval g) z₀
((g.eval z₀).abs) (complex.abs_pos.2 hg0) in
let δ := min (min (δ' / 2) 1) (((f.eval z₀).abs / (g.eval z₀).abs) / 2) in
have hf0' : 0 < (f.eval z₀).abs, from complex.abs_pos.2 hf0,
have hfg0 : 0 < abs (eval z₀ f) * (abs (eval z₀ g))⁻¹, from div_pos hf0' (complex.abs_pos.2 hg0),
have hδ0 : 0 < δ, from lt_min (lt_min (half_pos hδ'₁) (by norm_num)) (half_pos hfg0),
have hδ : ∀ z : ℂ, abs (z - z₀) = δ → abs (g.eval z - g.eval z₀) < (g.eval z₀).abs,
from λ z hz, hδ'₂ z (by rw [complex.dist_eq, hz];
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _))
(half_lt_self hδ'₁)),
have hδ1 : δ ≤ 1, from le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _),
let F : polynomial ℂ := C (f.eval z₀) + C (g.eval z₀) * (X - C z₀) ^ n in
let z' := (-f.eval z₀ * (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n /
((f.eval z₀).abs * g.eval z₀)) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ) + z₀ in
have hF₁ : F.eval z' = f.eval z₀ - f.eval z₀ * (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n / (f.eval z₀).abs,
by simp only [F, cpow_nat_inv_pow _ hn0, div_eq_mul_inv, eval_pow, mul_assoc, mul_comm (g.eval z₀),
mul_left_comm (g.eval z₀), mul_left_comm (g.eval z₀)⁻¹, mul_inv', inv_mul_cancel hg0,
eval_C, eval_add, eval_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, eval_mul, eval_X, add_neg_cancel_right,
neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, mul_one, div_eq_mul_inv];
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc],
have hδs : (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n / (f.eval z₀).abs < 1,
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, mul_comm, ← inv_inv' (complex.abs _ * _), mul_inv',
inv_inv', ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_lt_iff hfg0, one_mul];
calc δ ^ n ≤ δ ^ 1 : pow_le_pow_of_le_one (le_of_lt hδ0) hδ1 hn0
... = δ : pow_one _
... ≤ ((f.eval z₀).abs / (g.eval z₀).abs) / 2 : min_le_right _ _
... < _ : half_lt_self hfg0,
have hF₂ : (F.eval z').abs = (f.eval z₀).abs - (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n,
from calc (F.eval z').abs = (f.eval z₀ - f.eval z₀ * (g.eval z₀).abs
* δ ^ n / (f.eval z₀).abs).abs : congr_arg abs hF₁
... = abs (f.eval z₀) * complex.abs (1 - (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n /
(f.eval z₀).abs : ℝ) : by rw [← complex.abs_mul];
exact congr_arg complex.abs
(by simp [mul_add, add_mul, mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv])
... = _ : by rw [complex.abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt hδs)),
mul_sub, mul_div_cancel' _ (ne.symm (ne_of_lt hf0')), mul_one],
have hef0 : abs (eval z₀ g) * (eval z₀ f).abs ≠ 0,
from mul_ne_zero (mt complex.abs_eq_zero.1 hg0) (mt complex.abs_eq_zero.1 hf0),
have hz'z₀ : abs (z' - z₀) = δ,
by simp [z', mul_assoc, mul_left_comm _ (_ ^ n), mul_comm _ (_ ^ n),
mul_comm (eval z₀ f).abs, _root_.mul_div_cancel _ hef0, of_real_mul,
neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, neg_div, is_absolute_value.abv_pow complex.abs,
complex.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hδ0), real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv (le_of_lt hδ0) hn0],
have hF₃ : (f.eval z' - F.eval z').abs < (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n,
from calc (f.eval z' - F.eval z').abs
= (g.eval z' - g.eval z₀).abs * (z' - z₀).abs ^ n :
by rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq.1 hg, ← is_absolute_value.abv_pow complex.abs,
← complex.abs_mul, sub_mul];
simp [F, eval_pow, eval_add, eval_mul, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, add_sub_cancel]
... = (g.eval z' - g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n : by rw hz'z₀
... < _ : (mul_lt_mul_right (pow_pos hδ0 _)).2 (hδ _ hz'z₀),
lt_irrefl (f.eval z₀).abs $
calc (f.eval z₀).abs ≤ (f.eval z').abs : hz₀ _
... = (F.eval z' + (f.eval z' - F.eval z')).abs : by simp
... ≤ (F.eval z').abs + (f.eval z' - F.eval z').abs : complex.abs_add _ _
... < (f.eval z₀).abs - (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n + (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n :
add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (by rw hF₂) hF₃
... = (f.eval z₀).abs : sub_add_cancel _ _
end complex
|
09f557c45edfc969a630673dac2dba3bcd7afd21 | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/linear_algebra/char_poly/basic.lean | d79e7c7c20775d673274d5db9f557815692d4a7a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,809 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import tactic.apply_fun
import ring_theory.matrix_algebra
import ring_theory.polynomial_algebra
import linear_algebra.nonsingular_inverse
import tactic.squeeze
/-!
# Characteristic polynomials and the Cayley-Hamilton theorem
We define characteristic polynomials of matrices and
prove the Cayley–Hamilton theorem over arbitrary commutative rings.
## Main definitions
* `char_poly` is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix.
## Implementation details
We follow a nice proof from http://drorbn.net/AcademicPensieve/2015-12/CayleyHamilton.pdf
-/
noncomputable theory
universes u v w
open polynomial matrix
open_locale big_operators
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
variables {n : Type w} [decidable_eq n] [fintype n]
open finset
/--
The "characteristic matrix" of `M : matrix n n R` is the matrix of polynomials $t I - M$.
The determinant of this matrix is the characteristic polynomial.
-/
def char_matrix (M : matrix n n R) : matrix n n (polynomial R) :=
matrix.scalar n (X : polynomial R) - (C : R →+* polynomial R).map_matrix M
@[simp] lemma char_matrix_apply_eq (M : matrix n n R) (i : n) :
char_matrix M i i = (X : polynomial R) - C (M i i) :=
by simp only [char_matrix, sub_left_inj, pi.sub_apply, scalar_apply_eq,
ring_hom.map_matrix_apply, map_apply, dmatrix.sub_apply]
@[simp] lemma char_matrix_apply_ne (M : matrix n n R) (i j : n) (h : i ≠ j) :
char_matrix M i j = - C (M i j) :=
by simp only [char_matrix, pi.sub_apply, scalar_apply_ne _ _ _ h, zero_sub,
ring_hom.map_matrix_apply, map_apply, dmatrix.sub_apply]
lemma mat_poly_equiv_char_matrix (M : matrix n n R) :
mat_poly_equiv (char_matrix M) = X - C M :=
begin
ext k i j,
simp only [mat_poly_equiv_coeff_apply, coeff_sub, pi.sub_apply],
by_cases h : i = j,
{ subst h, rw [char_matrix_apply_eq, coeff_sub],
simp only [coeff_X, coeff_C],
split_ifs; simp, },
{ rw [char_matrix_apply_ne _ _ _ h, coeff_X, coeff_neg, coeff_C, coeff_C],
split_ifs; simp [h], }
end
/--
The characteristic polynomial of a matrix `M` is given by $\det (t I - M)$.
-/
def char_poly (M : matrix n n R) : polynomial R :=
(char_matrix M).det
/--
The Cayley-Hamilton theorem, that the characteristic polynomial of a matrix,
applied to the matrix itself, is zero.
This holds over any commutative ring.
-/
-- This proof follows http://drorbn.net/AcademicPensieve/2015-12/CayleyHamilton.pdf
theorem aeval_self_char_poly (M : matrix n n R) :
aeval M (char_poly M) = 0 :=
begin
-- We begin with the fact $χ_M(t) I = adjugate (t I - M) * (t I - M)$,
-- as an identity in `matrix n n (polynomial R)`.
have h : (char_poly M) • (1 : matrix n n (polynomial R)) =
adjugate (char_matrix M) * (char_matrix M) :=
(adjugate_mul _).symm,
-- Using the algebra isomorphism `matrix n n (polynomial R) ≃ₐ[R] polynomial (matrix n n R)`,
-- we have the same identity in `polynomial (matrix n n R)`.
apply_fun mat_poly_equiv at h,
simp only [mat_poly_equiv.map_mul,
mat_poly_equiv_char_matrix] at h,
-- Because the coefficient ring `matrix n n R` is non-commutative,
-- evaluation at `M` is not multiplicative.
-- However, any polynomial which is a product of the form $N * (t I - M)$
-- is sent to zero, because the evaluation function puts the polynomial variable
-- to the right of any coefficients, so everything telescopes.
apply_fun (λ p, p.eval M) at h,
rw eval_mul_X_sub_C at h,
-- Now $χ_M (t) I$, when thought of as a polynomial of matrices
-- and evaluated at some `N` is exactly $χ_M (N)$.
rw [mat_poly_equiv_smul_one, eval_map] at h,
-- Thus we have $χ_M(M) = 0$, which is the desired result.
exact h,
end
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.