blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5c70e1a3d98fa0378adb0c1c74e69e5eddda2b07 | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /library/init/meta/tactic.lean | ef4391b47f1954ab7d72713eff355817c71921af | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 42,146 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.function init.data.option.basic init.util
import init.category.combinators init.category.monad init.category.alternative init.category.monad_fail
import init.data.nat.div init.meta.exceptional init.meta.format init.meta.environment
import init.meta.pexpr init.data.to_string init.data.string.basic init.meta.interaction_monad
meta constant tactic_state : Type
universes u v
namespace tactic_state
/-- Create a tactic state with an empty local context and a dummy goal. -/
meta constant mk_empty : environment → options → tactic_state
meta constant env : tactic_state → environment
meta constant to_format : tactic_state → format
/- Format expression with respect to the main goal in the tactic state.
If the tactic state does not contain any goals, then format expression
using an empty local context. -/
meta constant format_expr : tactic_state → expr → format
meta constant get_options : tactic_state → options
meta constant set_options : tactic_state → options → tactic_state
end tactic_state
meta instance : has_to_format tactic_state :=
⟨tactic_state.to_format⟩
meta instance : has_to_string tactic_state :=
⟨λ s, (to_fmt s).to_string s.get_options⟩
@[reducible] meta def tactic := interaction_monad tactic_state
@[reducible] meta def tactic_result := interaction_monad.result tactic_state
namespace tactic
export interaction_monad (hiding failed fail)
meta def failed {α : Type} : tactic α := interaction_monad.failed
meta def fail {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [has_to_format β] (msg : β) : tactic α :=
interaction_monad.fail msg
end tactic
namespace tactic_result
export interaction_monad.result
end tactic_result
open tactic
open tactic_result
infixl ` >>=[tactic] `:2 := interaction_monad_bind
infixl ` >>[tactic] `:2 := interaction_monad_seq
meta instance : alternative tactic :=
{ interaction_monad.monad with
failure := @interaction_monad.failed _,
orelse := @interaction_monad_orelse _ }
meta def {u₁ u₂} tactic.up {α : Type u₂} (t : tactic α) : tactic (ulift.{u₁} α) :=
λ s, match t s with
| success a s' := success (ulift.up a) s'
| exception t ref s := exception t ref s
end
meta def {u₁ u₂} tactic.down {α : Type u₂} (t : tactic (ulift.{u₁} α)) : tactic α :=
λ s, match t s with
| success (ulift.up a) s' := success a s'
| exception t ref s := exception t ref s
end
namespace tactic
variables {α : Type u}
meta def try_core (t : tactic α) : tactic (option α) :=
λ s, result.cases_on (t s)
(λ a, success (some a))
(λ e ref s', success none s)
meta def skip : tactic unit :=
success ()
meta def try (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
try_core t >>[tactic] skip
meta def fail_if_success {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
λ s, result.cases_on (t s)
(λ a s, mk_exception "fail_if_success combinator failed, given tactic succeeded" none s)
(λ e ref s', success () s)
meta def success_if_fail {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
λ s, match t s with
| (interaction_monad.result.exception _ _ s') := success () s
| (interaction_monad.result.success a s) :=
mk_exception "success_if_fail combinator failed, given tactic succeeded" none s
end
open nat
/- (repeat_at_most n t): repeat the given tactic at most n times or until t fails -/
meta def repeat_at_most : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 t := skip
| (succ n) t := (do t, repeat_at_most n t) <|> skip
/- (repeat_exactly n t) : execute t n times -/
meta def repeat_exactly : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 t := skip
| (succ n) t := do t, repeat_exactly n t
meta def repeat : tactic unit → tactic unit :=
repeat_at_most 100000
meta def returnopt (e : option α) : tactic α :=
λ s, match e with
| (some a) := success a s
| none := mk_exception "failed" none s
end
meta instance opt_to_tac : has_coe (option α) (tactic α) :=
⟨returnopt⟩
/- Decorate t's exceptions with msg -/
meta def decorate_ex (msg : format) (t : tactic α) : tactic α :=
λ s, result.cases_on (t s)
success
(λ opt_thunk,
match opt_thunk with
| some e := exception (some (λ u, msg ++ format.nest 2 (format.line ++ e u)))
| none := exception none
end)
@[inline] meta def write (s' : tactic_state) : tactic unit :=
λ s, success () s'
@[inline] meta def read : tactic tactic_state :=
λ s, success s s
meta def get_options : tactic options :=
do s ← read, return s.get_options
meta def set_options (o : options) : tactic unit :=
do s ← read, write (s.set_options o)
meta def save_options {α : Type} (t : tactic α) : tactic α :=
do o ← get_options,
a ← t,
set_options o,
return a
meta def returnex {α : Type} (e : exceptional α) : tactic α :=
λ s, match e with
| exceptional.success a := success a s
| exceptional.exception ._ f :=
match get_options s with
| success opt _ := exception (some (λ u, f opt)) none s
| exception _ _ _ := exception (some (λ u, f options.mk)) none s
end
end
meta instance ex_to_tac {α : Type} : has_coe (exceptional α) (tactic α) :=
⟨returnex⟩
end tactic
meta def tactic_format_expr (e : expr) : tactic format :=
do s ← tactic.read, return (tactic_state.format_expr s e)
meta class has_to_tactic_format (α : Type u) :=
(to_tactic_format : α → tactic format)
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format expr :=
⟨tactic_format_expr⟩
meta def tactic.pp {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : α → tactic format :=
has_to_tactic_format.to_tactic_format
open tactic format
meta instance {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : has_to_tactic_format (list α) :=
⟨has_map.map to_fmt ∘ monad.mapm pp⟩
meta instance (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [has_to_tactic_format α] [has_to_tactic_format β] :
has_to_tactic_format (α × β) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, to_fmt <$> (prod.mk <$> pp a <*> pp b)⟩
meta def option_to_tactic_format {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : option α → tactic format
| (some a) := do fa ← pp a, return (to_fmt "(some " ++ fa ++ ")")
| none := return "none"
meta instance {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] : has_to_tactic_format (option α) :=
⟨option_to_tactic_format⟩
meta instance {α} (a : α) : has_to_tactic_format (reflected a) :=
⟨λ h, pp h.to_expr⟩
@[priority 10] meta instance has_to_format_to_has_to_tactic_format (α : Type) [has_to_format α] : has_to_tactic_format α :=
⟨(λ x, return x) ∘ to_fmt⟩
namespace tactic
open tactic_state
meta def get_env : tactic environment :=
do s ← read,
return $ env s
meta def get_decl (n : name) : tactic declaration :=
do s ← read,
(env s).get n
meta def trace {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] (a : α) : tactic unit :=
do fmt ← pp a,
return $ _root_.trace_fmt fmt (λ u, ())
meta def trace_call_stack : tactic unit :=
take state, _root_.trace_call_stack (success () state)
meta def timetac {α : Type u} (desc : string) (t : thunk (tactic α)) : tactic α :=
λ s, timeit desc (t () s)
meta def trace_state : tactic unit :=
do s ← read,
trace $ to_fmt s
inductive transparency
| all | semireducible | instances | reducible | none
export transparency (reducible semireducible)
/- (eval_expr α e) evaluates 'e' IF 'e' has type 'α'. -/
meta constant eval_expr (α : Type u) [reflected α] : expr → tactic α
/- Return the partial term/proof constructed so far. Note that the resultant expression
may contain variables that are not declarate in the current main goal. -/
meta constant result : tactic expr
/- Display the partial term/proof constructed so far. This tactic is *not* equivalent to
do { r ← result, s ← read, return (format_expr s r) } because this one will format the result with respect
to the current goal, and trace_result will do it with respect to the initial goal. -/
meta constant format_result : tactic format
/- Return target type of the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/
meta constant target : tactic expr
meta constant intro_core : name → tactic expr
meta constant intron : nat → tactic unit
/- Clear the given local constant. The tactic fails if the given expression is not a local constant. -/
meta constant clear : expr → tactic unit
meta constant revert_lst : list expr → tactic nat
/-- Return `e` in weak head normal form with respect to the given transparency setting. -/
meta constant whnf (e : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic expr
/- (head) eta expand the given expression -/
meta constant head_eta_expand : expr → tactic expr
/- (head) beta reduction -/
meta constant head_beta : expr → tactic expr
/- (head) zeta reduction -/
meta constant head_zeta : expr → tactic expr
/- zeta reduction -/
meta constant zeta : expr → tactic expr
/- (head) eta reduction -/
meta constant head_eta : expr → tactic expr
/-- Succeeds if `t` and `s` can be unified using the given transparency setting. -/
meta constant unify (t s : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/- Similar to `unify`, but it treats metavariables as constants. -/
meta constant is_def_eq (t s : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/- Infer the type of the given expression.
Remark: transparency does not affect type inference -/
meta constant infer_type : expr → tactic expr
meta constant get_local : name → tactic expr
/- Resolve a name using the current local context, environment, aliases, etc. -/
meta constant resolve_name : name → tactic pexpr
/- Return the hypothesis in the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/
meta constant local_context : tactic (list expr)
meta constant get_unused_name (n : name) (i : option nat := none) : tactic name
/-- Helper tactic for creating simple applications where some arguments are inferred using
type inference.
Example, given
```
rel.{l_1 l_2} : Pi (α : Type.{l_1}) (β : α -> Type.{l_2}), (Pi x : α, β x) -> (Pi x : α, β x) -> , Prop
nat : Type
real : Type
vec.{l} : Pi (α : Type l) (n : nat), Type.{l1}
f g : Pi (n : nat), vec real n
```
then
```
mk_app_core semireducible "rel" [f, g]
```
returns the application
```
rel.{1 2} nat (fun n : nat, vec real n) f g
```
The unification constraints due to type inference are solved using the transparency `md`.
-/
meta constant mk_app (fn : name) (args : list expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic expr
/-- Similar to `mk_app`, but allows to specify which arguments are explicit/implicit.
Example, given `(a b : nat)` then
```
mk_mapp "ite" [some (a > b), none, none, some a, some b]
```
returns the application
```
@ite.{1} (a > b) (nat.decidable_gt a b) nat a b
```
-/
meta constant mk_mapp (fn : name) (args : list (option expr)) (md := semireducible) : tactic expr
/-- (mk_congr_arg h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `congr_arg [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_congr_arg : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_congr_fun h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `congr_fun [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_congr_fun : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_congr h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `congr [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_congr : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_refl h) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.refl [h]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_refl : expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_symm h) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.symm [h]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_symm : expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_trans h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.trans [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_trans : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_mp h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.mp [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_mp : expr → expr → tactic expr
/-- (mk_eq_mpr h₁ h₂) is a more efficient version of (mk_app `eq.mpr [h₁, h₂]) -/
meta constant mk_eq_mpr : expr → expr → tactic expr
/- Given a local constant t, if t has type (lhs = rhs) apply substitution.
Otherwise, try to find a local constant that has type of the form (t = t') or (t' = t).
The tactic fails if the given expression is not a local constant. -/
meta constant subst : expr → tactic unit
/-- Close the current goal using `e`. Fail is the type of `e` is not definitionally equal to
the target type. -/
meta constant exact (e : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/-- Elaborate the given quoted expression with respect to the current main goal.
If `allow_mvars` is tt, then metavariables are tolerated and become new goals.
If `report_errors` is ff, then errors are reported using position information from q. -/
meta constant to_expr (q : pexpr) (allow_mvars := tt) : tactic expr
/- Return true if the given expression is a type class. -/
meta constant is_class : expr → tactic bool
/- Try to create an instance of the given type class. -/
meta constant mk_instance : expr → tactic expr
/- Change the target of the main goal.
The input expression must be definitionally equal to the current target.
If `check` is `ff`, then the tactic does not check whether `e`
is definitionally equal to the current target. If it is not,
then the error will only be detected by the kernel type checker. -/
meta constant change (e : expr) (check : bool := tt): tactic unit
/- (assert_core H T), adds a new goal for T, and change target to (T -> target). -/
meta constant assert_core : name → expr → tactic unit
/- (assertv_core H T P), change target to (T -> target) if P has type T. -/
meta constant assertv_core : name → expr → expr → tactic unit
/- (define_core H T), adds a new goal for T, and change target to (let H : T := ?M in target) in the current goal. -/
meta constant define_core : name → expr → tactic unit
/- (definev_core H T P), change target to (Let H : T := P in target) if P has type T. -/
meta constant definev_core : name → expr → expr → tactic unit
/- rotate goals to the left -/
meta constant rotate_left : nat → tactic unit
meta constant get_goals : tactic (list expr)
meta constant set_goals : list expr → tactic unit
/-- Configuration options for the `apply` tactic. -/
structure apply_cfg :=
(md := semireducible)
(approx := tt)
(all := ff)
(use_instances := tt)
/-- Apply the expression `e` to the main goal,
the unification is performed using the transparency mode in `cfg`.
If cfg.approx is `tt`, then fallback to first-order unification, and approximate context during unification.
If cfg.all is `tt`, then all unassigned meta-variables are added as new goals.
If cfg.use_instances is `tt`, then use type class resolution to instantiate unassigned meta-variables.
It returns a list of all introduced meta variables, even the assigned ones. -/
meta constant apply_core (e : expr) (cfg : apply_cfg := {}) : tactic (list expr)
/- Create a fresh meta universe variable. -/
meta constant mk_meta_univ : tactic level
/- Create a fresh meta-variable with the given type.
The scope of the new meta-variable is the local context of the main goal. -/
meta constant mk_meta_var : expr → tactic expr
/- Return the value assigned to the given universe meta-variable.
Fail if argument is not an universe meta-variable or if it is not assigned. -/
meta constant get_univ_assignment : level → tactic level
/- Return the value assigned to the given meta-variable.
Fail if argument is not a meta-variable or if it is not assigned. -/
meta constant get_assignment : expr → tactic expr
meta constant mk_fresh_name : tactic name
/- Return a hash code for expr that ignores inst_implicit arguments,
and proofs. -/
meta constant abstract_hash : expr → tactic nat
/- Return the "weight" of the given expr while ignoring inst_implicit arguments,
and proofs. -/
meta constant abstract_weight : expr → tactic nat
meta constant abstract_eq : expr → expr → tactic bool
/- Induction on `h` using recursor `rec`, names for the new hypotheses
are retrieved from `ns`. If `ns` does not have sufficient names, then use the internal binder names
in the recursor.
It returns for each new goal a list of new hypotheses and a list of substitutions for hypotheses
depending on `h`. The substitutions map internal names to their replacement terms. If the
replacement is again a hypothesis the user name stays the same. The internal names are only valid
in the original goal, not in the type context of the new goal.
If `rec` is none, then the type of `h` is inferred, if it is of the form `C ...`, tactic uses `C.rec` -/
meta constant induction (h : expr) (ns : list name := []) (rec : option name := none) (md := semireducible) : tactic (list (list expr × list (name × expr)))
/- Apply `cases_on` recursor, names for the new hypotheses are retrieved from `ns`.
`h` must be a local constant. It returns for each new goal the name of the constructor, a list of new hypotheses, and a list of
substitutions for hypotheses depending on `h`. The number of new goals may be smaller than the
number of constructors. Some goals may be discarded when the indices to not match.
See `induction` for information on the list of substitutions.
The `cases` tactic is implemented using this one, and it relaxes the restriction of `h`. -/
meta constant cases_core (h : expr) (ns : list name := []) (md := semireducible) : tactic (list (name × list expr × list (name × expr)))
/- Similar to cases tactic, but does not revert/intro/clear hypotheses. -/
meta constant destruct (e : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/- Generalizes the target with respect to `e`. -/
meta constant generalize (e : expr) (n : name := `_x) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit
/- instantiate assigned metavariables in the given expression -/
meta constant instantiate_mvars : expr → tactic expr
/- Add the given declaration to the environment -/
meta constant add_decl : declaration → tactic unit
/- (doc_string env d k) return the doc string for d (if available) -/
meta constant doc_string : name → tactic string
meta constant add_doc_string : name → string → tactic unit
/--
Create an auxiliary definition with name `c` where `type` and `value` may contain local constants and
meta-variables. This function collects all dependencies (universe parameters, universe metavariables,
local constants (aka hypotheses) and metavariables).
It updates the environment in the tactic_state, and returns an expression of the form
(c.{l_1 ... l_n} a_1 ... a_m)
where l_i's and a_j's are the collected dependencies.
-/
meta constant add_aux_decl (c : name) (type : expr) (val : expr) (is_lemma : bool) : tactic expr
meta constant module_doc_strings : tactic (list (option name × string))
/- Set attribute `attr_name` for constant `c_name` with the given priority.
If the priority is none, then use default -/
meta constant set_basic_attribute (attr_name : name) (c_name : name) (persistent := ff) (prio : option nat := none) : tactic unit
/- (unset_attribute attr_name c_name) -/
meta constant unset_attribute : name → name → tactic unit
/- (has_attribute attr_name c_name) succeeds if the declaration `decl_name`
has the attribute `attr_name`. The result is the priority. -/
meta constant has_attribute : name → name → tactic nat
/- (copy_attribute attr_name c_name d_name) copy attribute `attr_name` from
`src` to `tgt` if it is defined for `src` -/
meta def copy_attribute (attr_name : name) (src : name) (p : bool) (tgt : name) : tactic unit :=
try $ do
prio ← has_attribute attr_name src,
set_basic_attribute attr_name tgt p (some prio)
/-- Name of the declaration currently being elaborated. -/
meta constant decl_name : tactic name
/- (save_type_info e ref) save (typeof e) at position associated with ref -/
meta constant save_type_info {elab : bool} : expr → expr elab → tactic unit
meta constant save_info_thunk : pos → (unit → format) → tactic unit
/-- Return list of currently open namespaces -/
meta constant open_namespaces : tactic (list name)
/-- Return tt iff `t` "occurs" in `e`. The occurrence checking is performed using
keyed matching with the given transparency setting.
We say `t` occurs in `e` by keyed matching iff there is a subterm `s`
s.t. `t` and `s` have the same head, and `is_def_eq t s md`
The main idea is to minimize the number of `is_def_eq` checks
performed. -/
meta constant kdepends_on (e t : expr) (md := reducible) : tactic bool
/-- Blocks the execution of the current thread for at least `msecs` milliseconds.
This tactic is used mainly for debugging purposes. -/
meta constant sleep (msecs : nat) : tactic unit
open list nat
meta def induction' (h : expr) (ns : list name := []) (rec : option name := none) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit :=
induction h ns rec md >> return ()
/-- Remark: set_goals will erase any solved goal -/
meta def cleanup : tactic unit :=
get_goals >>= set_goals
/- Auxiliary definition used to implement begin ... end blocks -/
meta def step {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
t >>[tactic] cleanup
meta def istep {α : Type u} (line0 col0 : ℕ) (line col : ℕ) (t : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
λ s, (@scope_trace _ line col (step t s)).clamp_pos line0 line col
meta def is_prop (e : expr) : tactic bool :=
do t ← infer_type e,
return (t = `(Prop))
/-- Return true iff n is the name of declaration that is a proposition. -/
meta def is_prop_decl (n : name) : tactic bool :=
do env ← get_env,
d ← env.get n,
t ← return $ d.type,
is_prop t
meta def is_proof (e : expr) : tactic bool :=
infer_type e >>= is_prop
meta def whnf_no_delta (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
whnf e transparency.none
meta def whnf_target : tactic unit :=
target >>= whnf >>= change
meta def unsafe_change (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
change e ff
meta def intro (n : name) : tactic expr :=
do t ← target,
if expr.is_pi t ∨ expr.is_let t then intro_core n
else whnf_target >> intro_core n
meta def intro1 : tactic expr :=
intro `_
meta def intros : tactic (list expr) :=
do t ← target,
match t with
| expr.pi _ _ _ _ := do H ← intro1, Hs ← intros, return (H :: Hs)
| expr.elet _ _ _ _ := do H ← intro1, Hs ← intros, return (H :: Hs)
| _ := return []
end
meta def intro_lst : list name → tactic (list expr)
| [] := return []
| (n::ns) := do H ← intro n, Hs ← intro_lst ns, return (H :: Hs)
/- Introduces new hypotheses with forward dependencies -/
meta def intros_dep : tactic (list expr) :=
do t ← target,
let proc (b : expr) :=
if b.has_var_idx 0 then
do h ← intro1, hs ← intros_dep, return (h::hs)
else
-- body doesn't depend on new hypothesis
return [],
match t with
| expr.pi _ _ _ b := proc b
| expr.elet _ _ _ b := proc b
| _ := return []
end
meta def introv : list name → tactic (list expr)
| [] := intros_dep
| (n::ns) := do hs ← intros_dep, h ← intro n, hs' ← introv ns, return (hs ++ h :: hs')
/-- Returns n fully qualified if it refers to a constant, or else fails. -/
meta def resolve_constant (n : name) : tactic name :=
do (expr.const n _) ← resolve_name n,
pure n
meta def to_expr_strict (q : pexpr) : tactic expr :=
to_expr q
meta def revert (l : expr) : tactic nat :=
revert_lst [l]
meta def clear_lst : list name → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (n::ns) := do H ← get_local n, clear H, clear_lst ns
meta def match_not (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
match (expr.is_not e) with
| (some a) := return a
| none := fail "expression is not a negation"
end
meta def match_and (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_and e) with
| (some (α, β)) := return (α, β)
| none := fail "expression is not a conjunction"
end
meta def match_or (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_or e) with
| (some (α, β)) := return (α, β)
| none := fail "expression is not a disjunction"
end
meta def match_eq (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_eq e) with
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := return (lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not an equality"
end
meta def match_ne (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_ne e) with
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := return (lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not a disequality"
end
meta def match_heq (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr × expr × expr) :=
do match (expr.is_heq e) with
| (some (α, lhs, β, rhs)) := return (α, lhs, β, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not a heterogeneous equality"
end
meta def match_refl_app (e : expr) : tactic (name × expr × expr) :=
do env ← get_env,
match (environment.is_refl_app env e) with
| (some (R, lhs, rhs)) := return (R, lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not an application of a reflexive relation"
end
meta def match_app_of (e : expr) (n : name) : tactic (list expr) :=
guard (expr.is_app_of e n) >> return e.get_app_args
meta def get_local_type (n : name) : tactic expr :=
get_local n >>= infer_type
meta def trace_result : tactic unit :=
format_result >>= trace
meta def rexact (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
exact e reducible
/- (find_same_type t es) tries to find in es an expression with type definitionally equal to t -/
meta def find_same_type : expr → list expr → tactic expr
| e [] := failed
| e (H :: Hs) :=
do t ← infer_type H,
(unify e t >> return H) <|> find_same_type e Hs
meta def find_assumption (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do ctx ← local_context, find_same_type e ctx
meta def assumption : tactic unit :=
do { ctx ← local_context,
t ← target,
H ← find_same_type t ctx,
exact H }
<|> fail "assumption tactic failed"
meta def save_info (p : pos) : tactic unit :=
do s ← read,
tactic.save_info_thunk p (λ _, tactic_state.to_format s)
notation `‹` p `›` := show p, by assumption
/- Swap first two goals, do nothing if tactic state does not have at least two goals. -/
meta def swap : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| (g₁ :: g₂ :: rs) := set_goals (g₂ :: g₁ :: rs)
| e := skip
end
/- (assert h t), adds a new goal for t, and the hypothesis (h : t) in the current goal. -/
meta def assert (h : name) (t : expr) : tactic expr :=
do assert_core h t, swap, e ← intro h, swap, return e
/- (assertv h t v), adds the hypothesis (h : t) in the current goal if v has type t. -/
meta def assertv (h : name) (t : expr) (v : expr) : tactic expr :=
assertv_core h t v >> intro h
/- (define h t), adds a new goal for t, and the hypothesis (h : t := ?M) in the current goal. -/
meta def define (h : name) (t : expr) : tactic expr :=
do define_core h t, swap, e ← intro h, swap, return e
/- (definev h t v), adds the hypothesis (h : t := v) in the current goal if v has type t. -/
meta def definev (h : name) (t : expr) (v : expr) : tactic expr :=
definev_core h t v >> intro h
/- Add (h : t := pr) to the current goal -/
meta def pose (h : name) (t : option expr := none) (pr : expr) : tactic expr :=
let dv := λt, definev h t pr in
option.cases_on t (infer_type pr >>= dv) dv
/- Add (h : t) to the current goal, given a proof (pr : t) -/
meta def note (h : name) (t : option expr := none) (pr : expr) : tactic expr :=
let dv := λt, assertv h t pr in
option.cases_on t (infer_type pr >>= dv) dv
/- Return the number of goals that need to be solved -/
meta def num_goals : tactic nat :=
do gs ← get_goals,
return (length gs)
/- We have to provide the instance argument `[has_mod nat]` because
mod for nat was not defined yet -/
meta def rotate_right (n : nat) [has_mod nat] : tactic unit :=
do ng ← num_goals,
if ng = 0 then skip
else rotate_left (ng - n % ng)
meta def rotate : nat → tactic unit :=
rotate_left
/- first [t_1, ..., t_n] applies the first tactic that doesn't fail.
The tactic fails if all t_i's fail. -/
meta def first {α : Type u} : list (tactic α) → tactic α
| [] := fail "first tactic failed, no more alternatives"
| (t::ts) := t <|> first ts
/- Applies the given tactic to the main goal and fails if it is not solved. -/
meta def solve1 (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| [] := fail "focus tactic failed, there isn't any goal left to focus"
| (g::rs) :=
do set_goals [g],
tac,
gs' ← get_goals,
match gs' with
| [] := set_goals rs
| gs := fail "focus tactic failed, focused goal has not been solved"
end
end
/- solve [t_1, ... t_n] applies the first tactic that solves the main goal. -/
meta def solve (ts : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
first $ map solve1 ts
private meta def focus_aux : list (tactic unit) → list expr → list expr → tactic unit
| [] [] rs := set_goals rs
| [] gs rs := fail "focus tactic failed, insufficient number of tactics"
| (t::ts) (g::gs) rs := do
set_goals [g], t, rs' ← get_goals,
focus_aux ts gs (rs ++ rs')
| (t::ts) [] rs := fail "focus tactic failed, insufficient number of goals"
/- focus [t_1, ..., t_n] applies t_i to the i-th goal. Fails if the number of goals is not n. -/
meta def focus (ts : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals, focus_aux ts gs []
meta def focus1 {α} (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
do g::gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| [] := tac
| _ := do
set_goals [g],
a ← tac,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals (gs' ++ gs),
return a
end
private meta def all_goals_core (tac : tactic unit) : list expr → list expr → tactic unit
| [] ac := set_goals ac
| (g :: gs) ac :=
do set_goals [g],
tac,
new_gs ← get_goals,
all_goals_core gs (ac ++ new_gs)
/- Apply the given tactic to all goals. -/
meta def all_goals (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
all_goals_core tac gs []
private meta def any_goals_core (tac : tactic unit) : list expr → list expr → bool → tactic unit
| [] ac progress := guard progress >> set_goals ac
| (g :: gs) ac progress :=
do set_goals [g],
succeeded ← try_core tac,
new_gs ← get_goals,
any_goals_core gs (ac ++ new_gs) (succeeded.is_some || progress)
/- Apply the given tactic to any goal where it succeeds. The tactic succeeds only if
tac succeeds for at least one goal. -/
meta def any_goals (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
any_goals_core tac gs [] ff
/- LCF-style AND_THEN tactic. It applies tac1, and if succeed applies tac2 to each subgoal produced by tac1 -/
meta def seq (tac1 : tactic unit) (tac2 : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do g::gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [g],
tac1, all_goals tac2,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals (gs' ++ gs)
meta def seq_focus (tac1 : tactic unit) (tacs2 : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
do g::gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [g],
tac1, focus tacs2,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals (gs' ++ gs)
meta instance andthen_seq : has_andthen (tactic unit) (tactic unit) (tactic unit) :=
⟨seq⟩
meta instance andthen_seq_focus : has_andthen (tactic unit) (list (tactic unit)) (tactic unit) :=
⟨seq_focus⟩
meta constant is_trace_enabled_for : name → bool
/- Execute tac only if option trace.n is set to true. -/
meta def when_tracing (n : name) (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
when (is_trace_enabled_for n = tt) tac
/- Fail if there are no remaining goals. -/
meta def fail_if_no_goals : tactic unit :=
do n ← num_goals,
when (n = 0) (fail "tactic failed, there are no goals to be solved")
/- Fail if there are unsolved goals. -/
meta def done : tactic unit :=
do n ← num_goals,
when (n ≠ 0) (fail "done tactic failed, there are unsolved goals")
meta def apply (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
apply_core e >> return ()
meta def fapply (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
apply_core e {all := tt} >> return ()
/- Try to solve the main goal using type class resolution. -/
meta def apply_instance : tactic unit :=
do tgt ← target >>= instantiate_mvars,
b ← is_class tgt,
if b then mk_instance tgt >>= exact
else fail "apply_instance tactic fail, target is not a type class"
/- Create a list of universe meta-variables of the given size. -/
meta def mk_num_meta_univs : nat → tactic (list level)
| 0 := return []
| (succ n) := do
l ← mk_meta_univ,
ls ← mk_num_meta_univs n,
return (l::ls)
/- Return (expr.const c [l_1, ..., l_n]) where l_i's are fresh universe meta-variables. -/
meta def mk_const (c : name) : tactic expr :=
do env ← get_env,
decl ← env.get c,
let num := decl.univ_params.length,
ls ← mk_num_meta_univs num,
return (expr.const c ls)
/-- Apply the constant `c` -/
meta def applyc (c : name) : tactic unit :=
mk_const c >>= apply
meta def save_const_type_info (n : name) {elab : bool} (ref : expr elab) : tactic unit :=
try (do c ← mk_const n, save_type_info c ref)
/- Create a fresh universe ?u, a metavariable (?T : Type.{?u}),
and return metavariable (?M : ?T).
This action can be used to create a meta-variable when
we don't know its type at creation time -/
meta def mk_mvar : tactic expr :=
do u ← mk_meta_univ,
t ← mk_meta_var (expr.sort u),
mk_meta_var t
/-- Makes a sorry macro with a meta-variable as its type. -/
meta def mk_sorry : tactic expr := do
u ← mk_meta_univ,
t ← mk_meta_var (expr.sort u),
return $ expr.mk_sorry t
/-- Closes the main goal using sorry. -/
meta def admit : tactic unit :=
target >>= exact ∘ expr.mk_sorry
meta def mk_local' (pp_name : name) (bi : binder_info) (type : expr) : tactic expr := do
uniq_name ← mk_fresh_name,
return $ expr.local_const uniq_name pp_name bi type
meta def mk_local_def (pp_name : name) (type : expr) : tactic expr :=
mk_local' pp_name binder_info.default type
meta def mk_local_pis : expr → tactic (list expr × expr)
| (expr.pi n bi d b) := do
p ← mk_local' n bi d,
(ps, r) ← mk_local_pis (expr.instantiate_var b p),
return ((p :: ps), r)
| e := return ([], e)
private meta def get_pi_arity_aux : expr → tactic nat
| (expr.pi n bi d b) :=
do m ← mk_fresh_name,
let l := expr.local_const m n bi d,
new_b ← whnf (expr.instantiate_var b l),
r ← get_pi_arity_aux new_b,
return (r + 1)
| e := return 0
/- Compute the arity of the given (Pi-)type -/
meta def get_pi_arity (type : expr) : tactic nat :=
whnf type >>= get_pi_arity_aux
/- Compute the arity of the given function -/
meta def get_arity (fn : expr) : tactic nat :=
infer_type fn >>= get_pi_arity
meta def triv : tactic unit := mk_const `trivial >>= exact
notation `dec_trivial` := of_as_true (by tactic.triv)
meta def by_contradiction (H : option name := none) : tactic expr :=
do tgt : expr ← target,
(match_not tgt >> return ())
<|>
(mk_mapp `decidable.by_contradiction [some tgt, none] >>= apply)
<|>
fail "tactic by_contradiction failed, target is not a negation nor a decidable proposition (remark: when 'local attribute classical.prop_decidable [instance]' is used all propositions are decidable)",
match H with
| some n := intro n
| none := intro1
end
private meta def generalizes_aux (md : transparency) : list expr → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (e::es) := generalize e `x md >> generalizes_aux es
meta def generalizes (es : list expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit :=
generalizes_aux md es
private meta def kdependencies_core (e : expr) (md : transparency) : list expr → list expr → tactic (list expr)
| [] r := return r
| (h::hs) r :=
do type ← infer_type h,
d ← kdepends_on type e md,
if d then kdependencies_core hs (h::r)
else kdependencies_core hs r
/-- Return all hypotheses that depends on `e`
The dependency test is performed using `kdepends_on` with the given transparency setting. -/
meta def kdependencies (e : expr) (md := reducible) : tactic (list expr) :=
do ctx ← local_context, kdependencies_core e md ctx []
/-- Revert all hypotheses that depend on `e` -/
meta def revert_kdependencies (e : expr) (md := reducible) : tactic nat :=
kdependencies e md >>= revert_lst
meta def revert_kdeps (e : expr) (md := reducible) :=
revert_kdependencies e md
/-- Similar to `cases_core`, but `e` doesn't need to be a hypothesis.
Remark, it reverts dependencies using `revert_kdeps`.
Two different transparency modes are used `md` and `dmd`.
The mode `md` is used with `cases_core` and `dmd` with `generalize` and `revert_kdeps`. -/
meta def cases (e : expr) (ids : list name := []) (md := semireducible) (dmd := semireducible) : tactic unit :=
if e.is_local_constant then
cases_core e ids md >> return ()
else do
x ← mk_fresh_name,
n ← revert_kdependencies e dmd,
(tactic.generalize e x dmd)
<|>
(do t ← infer_type e,
tactic.assertv x t e,
get_local x >>= tactic.revert,
return ()),
h ← tactic.intro1,
(step (cases_core h ids md); intron n)
meta def refine (e : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do tgt : expr ← target,
to_expr ``(%%e : %%tgt) tt >>= exact
meta def by_cases (e : expr) (h : name) : tactic unit :=
do dec_e ← (mk_app `decidable [e] <|> fail "by_cases tactic failed, type is not a proposition"),
inst ← (mk_instance dec_e <|> fail "by_cases tactic failed, type of given expression is not decidable"),
cases inst [h, h],
swap
private meta def get_undeclared_const (env : environment) (base : name) : ℕ → name | i :=
let n := base <.> ("_aux_" ++ to_string i) in
if ¬env.contains n then n
else get_undeclared_const (i+1)
meta def new_aux_decl_name : tactic name := do
env ← get_env, n ← decl_name,
return $ get_undeclared_const env n 1
private meta def mk_aux_decl_name : option name → tactic name
| none := new_aux_decl_name
| (some suffix) := do p ← decl_name, return $ p ++ suffix
meta def abstract (tac : tactic unit) (suffix : option name := none) (zeta_reduce := tt) : tactic unit :=
do fail_if_no_goals,
gs ← get_goals,
type ← if zeta_reduce then target >>= zeta else target,
is_lemma ← is_prop type,
m ← mk_meta_var type,
set_goals [m],
tac,
n ← num_goals,
when (n ≠ 0) (fail "abstract tactic failed, there are unsolved goals"),
set_goals gs,
val ← instantiate_mvars m,
val ← if zeta_reduce then zeta val else return val,
c ← mk_aux_decl_name suffix,
e ← add_aux_decl c type val is_lemma,
exact e
/- (solve_aux type tac) synthesize an element of 'type' using tactic 'tac' -/
meta def solve_aux {α : Type} (type : expr) (tac : tactic α) : tactic (α × expr) :=
do m ← mk_meta_var type,
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [m],
a ← tac,
set_goals gs,
return (a, m)
/-- Return tt iff 'd' is a declaration in one of the current open namespaces -/
meta def in_open_namespaces (d : name) : tactic bool :=
do ns ← open_namespaces,
env ← get_env,
return $ ns.any (λ n, n.is_prefix_of d) && env.contains d
/-- Execute tac for 'max' "heartbeats". The heartbeat is approx. the maximum number of
memory allocations (in thousands) performed by 'tac'. This is a deterministic way of interrupting
long running tactics. -/
meta def try_for {α} (max : nat) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
λ s,
match _root_.try_for max (tac s) with
| some r := r
| none := mk_exception "try_for tactic failed, timeout" none s
end
meta def add_meta_definition (n : name) (lvls : list name) (type value : expr) : tactic unit :=
add_decl (declaration.defn n lvls type value reducibility_hints.abbrev ff)
meta def apply_opt_param : tactic unit :=
do `(opt_param %%t %%v) ← target,
exact v
meta def apply_auto_param : tactic unit :=
do `(auto_param %%type %%tac_name_expr) ← target,
change type,
tac_name ← eval_expr name tac_name_expr,
tac ← eval_expr (tactic unit) (expr.const tac_name []),
tac
meta def rename (curr : name) (new : name) : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_local curr,
n ← revert h,
intro new,
intron (n - 1)
end tactic
notation [parsing_only] `command`:max := tactic unit
open tactic
namespace list
meta def for_each {α} : list α → (α → tactic unit) → tactic unit
| [] fn := skip
| (e::es) fn := do fn e, for_each es fn
meta def any_of {α β} : list α → (α → tactic β) → tactic β
| [] fn := failed
| (e::es) fn := do opt_b ← try_core (fn e),
match opt_b with
| some b := return b
| none := any_of es fn
end
end list
/-
Define id_locked using meta-programming because we don't have
syntax for setting reducibility_hints.
See module init.meta.declaration.
Remark: id_locked is used in the builtin implementation of tactic.change
-/
run_cmd do
let l := level.param `l,
let Ty : pexpr := expr.sort l,
type ← to_expr ``(Π (α : %%Ty), α → α),
val ← to_expr ``(λ (α : %%Ty) (a : α), a),
add_decl (declaration.defn `id_locked [`l] type val reducibility_hints.opaque tt)
lemma id_locked_eq {α : Type u} (a : α) : id_locked α a = a :=
rfl
/- Install monad laws tactic and use it to prove some instances. -/
meta def control_laws_tac := whnf_target >> intros >> to_expr ``(rfl) >>= exact
meta def unsafe_monad_from_pure_bind {m : Type u → Type v}
(pure : Π {α : Type u}, α → m α)
(bind : Π {α β : Type u}, m α → (α → m β) → m β) : monad m :=
{pure := @pure, bind := @bind,
id_map := undefined, pure_bind := undefined, bind_assoc := undefined}
meta instance : monad task :=
{map := @task.map, bind := @task.bind, pure := @task.pure,
id_map := undefined, pure_bind := undefined, bind_assoc := undefined,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := undefined}
|
addf62c5c24a0b7ada6b0b2f4954e4b3fbc28a45 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/measure_theory/integral/mean_inequalities.lean | 345e24c4de101cea828d8b83ecb8c6e94536fc94 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,761 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue
import analysis.mean_inequalities
import measure_theory.function.special_functions
/-!
# Mean value inequalities for integrals
In this file we prove several inequalities on integrals, notably the Hölder inequality and
the Minkowski inequality. The versions for finite sums are in `analysis.mean_inequalities`.
## Main results
Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℝ≥0` functions: we prove
`∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q` conjugate real exponents
and `α→(e)nnreal` functions in two cases,
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `nnreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0 functions.
Minkowski's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of measurable functions with `ℝ≥0∞` values:
we prove `(∫ (f + g)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫ g^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `1 ≤ p`.
-/
section lintegral
/-!
### Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of ℝ≥0∞ and nnreal functions
We prove `∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q`
conjugate real exponents and `α→(e)nnreal` functions in several cases, the first two being useful
only to prove the more general results:
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are equal to 1,
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are neither ⊤ nor 0,
* `ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `nnreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : nnreal functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal ennreal
open measure_theory
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
namespace ennreal
lemma lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ)
(hf_norm : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = 1) (hg_norm : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ = 1) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ 1 :=
begin
calc ∫⁻ (a : α), ((f * g) a) ∂μ
≤ ∫⁻ (a : α), ((f a)^p / ennreal.of_real p + (g a)^q / ennreal.of_real q) ∂μ :
lintegral_mono (λ a, young_inequality (f a) (g a) hpq)
... = 1 :
begin
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv],
rw lintegral_add',
{ rw [lintegral_mul_const'' _ (hf.pow_const p), lintegral_mul_const'' _ (hg.pow_const q),
hf_norm, hg_norm, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv, hpq.inv_add_inv_conj_ennreal], },
{ exact (hf.pow_const _).mul_const _, },
{ exact (hg.pow_const _).mul_const _, },
end
end
/-- Function multiplied by the inverse of its p-seminorm `(∫⁻ f^p ∂μ) ^ 1/p`-/
def fun_mul_inv_snorm (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (p : ℝ) (μ : measure α) : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
λ a, (f a) * ((∫⁻ c, (f c) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹
lemma fun_eq_fun_mul_inv_snorm_mul_snorm {p : ℝ} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ 0) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) {a : α} :
f a = (fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ a) * (∫⁻ c, (f c)^p ∂μ)^(1/p) :=
by simp [fun_mul_inv_snorm, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, hf_nonzero, hf_top]
lemma fun_mul_inv_snorm_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : α} :
(fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ a) ^ p = (f a)^p * (∫⁻ c, (f c) ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw [fun_mul_inv_snorm, mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (le_of_lt hp0)],
suffices h_inv_rpow : ((∫⁻ (c : α), f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹ ^ p = (∫⁻ (c : α), f c ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹,
by rw h_inv_rpow,
rw [inv_rpow, ← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hp0.ne', rpow_one]
end
lemma lintegral_rpow_fun_mul_inv_snorm_eq_one {p : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ 0) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) :
∫⁻ c, (fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ c)^p ∂μ = 1 :=
begin
simp_rw fun_mul_inv_snorm_rpow hp0_lt,
rw [lintegral_mul_const'' _ (hf.pow_const p), mul_inv_cancel hf_nonzero hf_top],
end
/-- Hölder's inequality in case of finite non-zero integrals -/
lemma lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ)
(hf_nontop : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) (hg_nontop : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ ≠ ⊤)
(hf_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ ≠ 0) (hg_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ)^(1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ)^(1/q) :=
begin
let npf := (∫⁻ (c : α), (f c) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1/p),
let nqg := (∫⁻ (c : α), (g c) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1/q),
calc ∫⁻ (a : α), (f * g) a ∂μ
= ∫⁻ (a : α), ((fun_mul_inv_snorm f p μ * fun_mul_inv_snorm g q μ) a)
* (npf * nqg) ∂μ :
begin
refine lintegral_congr (λ a, _),
rw [pi.mul_apply, fun_eq_fun_mul_inv_snorm_mul_snorm f hf_nonzero hf_nontop,
fun_eq_fun_mul_inv_snorm_mul_snorm g hg_nonzero hg_nontop, pi.mul_apply],
ring,
end
... ≤ npf * nqg :
begin
rw lintegral_mul_const' (npf * nqg) _ (by simp [hf_nontop, hg_nontop, hf_nonzero, hg_nonzero]),
nth_rewrite 1 ←one_mul (npf * nqg),
refine mul_le_mul _ (le_refl (npf * nqg)),
have hf1 := lintegral_rpow_fun_mul_inv_snorm_eq_one hpq.pos hf hf_nonzero hf_nontop,
have hg1 := lintegral_rpow_fun_mul_inv_snorm_eq_one hpq.symm.pos hg hg_nonzero hg_nontop,
exact lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one hpq (hf.mul_const _)
(hg.mul_const _) hf1 hg1,
end
end
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero {p : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
begin
rw lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (hf.pow_const p) at hf_zero,
refine filter.eventually.mp hf_zero (filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _)),
dsimp only,
rw [pi.zero_apply, rpow_eq_zero_iff],
intro hx,
cases hx,
{ exact hx.left, },
{ exfalso,
linarith, },
end
lemma lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero {p : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = 0) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ = 0 :=
begin
rw ←@lintegral_zero_fun α _ μ,
refine lintegral_congr_ae _,
suffices h_mul_zero : f * g =ᵐ[μ] 0 * g , by rwa zero_mul at h_mul_zero,
have hf_eq_zero : f =ᵐ[μ] 0, from ae_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hp0_lt hf hf_zero,
exact filter.eventually_eq.mul hf_eq_zero (ae_eq_refl g),
end
lemma lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top {p q : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) (hq0 : 0 ≤ q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ = ⊤) (hg_nonzero : ∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
refine le_trans le_top (le_of_eq _),
have hp0_inv_lt : 0 < 1/p, by simp [hp0_lt],
rw [hf_top, ennreal.top_rpow_of_pos hp0_inv_lt],
simp [hq0, hg_nonzero],
end
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0∞`. The integral of the product of two functions
is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq (μ : measure α) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
by_cases hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ = 0,
{ refine le_trans (le_of_eq _) (zero_le _),
exact lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hpq.pos hf hf_zero, },
by_cases hg_zero : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ q ∂μ = 0,
{ refine le_trans (le_of_eq _) (zero_le _),
rw mul_comm,
exact lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hpq.symm.pos hg hg_zero, },
by_cases hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ = ⊤,
{ exact lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top hpq.pos hpq.symm.nonneg hf_top hg_zero, },
by_cases hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ q ∂μ = ⊤,
{ rw [mul_comm, mul_comm ((∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))],
exact lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top hpq.symm.pos hpq.nonneg hg_top hf_zero, },
-- non-⊤ non-zero case
exact ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top hpq hf hg hf_top hg_top hf_zero
hg_zero,
end
lemma lintegral_rpow_add_lt_top_of_lintegral_rpow_lt_top {p : ℝ}
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ < ⊤)
(hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ < ⊤) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) :
∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a) ^ p ∂μ < ⊤ :=
begin
have hp0_lt : 0 < p, from lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1,
have hp0 : 0 ≤ p, from le_of_lt hp0_lt,
calc ∫⁻ (a : α), (f a + g a) ^ p ∂μ
≤ ∫⁻ a, ((2:ℝ≥0∞)^(p-1) * (f a) ^ p + (2:ℝ≥0∞)^(p-1) * (g a) ^ p) ∂ μ :
begin
refine lintegral_mono (λ a, _),
dsimp only,
have h_zero_lt_half_rpow : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < (1 / 2) ^ p,
{ rw [←ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos hp0_lt],
exact ennreal.rpow_lt_rpow (by simp [zero_lt_one]) hp0_lt, },
have h_rw : (1 / 2) ^ p * (2:ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) = 1 / 2,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ennreal.rpow_add _ _ ennreal.two_ne_zero ennreal.coe_ne_top,
←mul_assoc, ←ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0, one_div,
ennreal.inv_mul_cancel ennreal.two_ne_zero ennreal.coe_ne_top, ennreal.one_rpow,
one_mul, ennreal.rpow_neg_one], },
rw ←ennreal.mul_le_mul_left (ne_of_lt h_zero_lt_half_rpow).symm _,
{ rw [mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, h_rw, ←ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0, mul_add],
refine ennreal.rpow_arith_mean_le_arith_mean2_rpow (1/2 : ℝ≥0∞) (1/2 : ℝ≥0∞)
(f a) (g a) _ hp1,
rw [ennreal.div_add_div_same, one_add_one_eq_two,
ennreal.div_self ennreal.two_ne_zero ennreal.coe_ne_top], },
{ rw ← lt_top_iff_ne_top,
refine ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg hp0 _,
rw [one_div, ennreal.inv_ne_top],
exact ennreal.two_ne_zero, },
end
... < ⊤ :
begin
rw [lintegral_add', lintegral_const_mul'' _ (hf.pow_const p),
lintegral_const_mul'' _ (hg.pow_const p), ennreal.add_lt_top],
{ have h_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) < ⊤,
from ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp [hp1]) ennreal.coe_ne_top,
repeat {rw ennreal.mul_lt_top_iff},
simp [hf_top, hg_top, h_two], },
{ exact (hf.pow_const _).const_mul _ },
{ exact (hg.pow_const _).const_mul _ },
end
end
lemma lintegral_Lp_mul_le_Lq_mul_Lr {α} [measurable_space α] {p q r : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p)
(hpq : p < q) (hpqr : 1/p = 1/q + 1/r) (μ : measure α) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
(∫⁻ a, ((f * g) a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^r ∂μ) ^ (1/r) :=
begin
have hp0_ne : p ≠ 0, from (ne_of_lt hp0_lt).symm,
have hp0 : 0 ≤ p, from le_of_lt hp0_lt,
have hq0_lt : 0 < q, from lt_of_le_of_lt hp0 hpq,
have hq0_ne : q ≠ 0, from (ne_of_lt hq0_lt).symm,
have h_one_div_r : 1/r = 1/p - 1/q, by simp [hpqr],
have hr0_ne : r ≠ 0,
{ have hr_inv_pos : 0 < 1/r,
by rwa [h_one_div_r, sub_pos, one_div_lt_one_div hq0_lt hp0_lt],
rw [one_div, _root_.inv_pos] at hr_inv_pos,
exact (ne_of_lt hr_inv_pos).symm, },
let p2 := q/p,
let q2 := p2.conjugate_exponent,
have hp2q2 : p2.is_conjugate_exponent q2,
from real.is_conjugate_exponent_conjugate_exponent (by simp [lt_div_iff, hpq, hp0_lt]),
calc (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f * g) a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)
= (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a)^p * (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) :
by simp_rw [pi.mul_apply, ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0]
... ≤ ((∫⁻ a, (f a)^(p * p2) ∂ μ)^(1/p2) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^(p * q2) ∂ μ)^(1/q2)) ^ (1/p) :
begin
refine ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (by simp [hp0]),
simp_rw ennreal.rpow_mul,
exact ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hp2q2 (hf.pow_const _) (hg.pow_const _)
end
... = (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) * (∫⁻ (a : α), (g a) ^ r ∂μ) ^ (1 / r) :
begin
rw [@ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (1/p) (by simp [hp0]), ←ennreal.rpow_mul,
←ennreal.rpow_mul],
have hpp2 : p * p2 = q,
{ symmetry, rw [mul_comm, ←div_eq_iff hp0_ne], },
have hpq2 : p * q2 = r,
{ rw [← inv_inv₀ r, ← one_div, ← one_div, h_one_div_r],
field_simp [q2, real.conjugate_exponent, p2, hp0_ne, hq0_ne] },
simp_rw [div_mul_div, mul_one, mul_comm p2, mul_comm q2, hpp2, hpq2],
end
end
lemma lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) :
∫⁻ a, (f a) * (g a) ^ (p - 1) ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
refine le_trans (ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf (hg.pow_const _)) _,
by_cases hf_zero_rpow : (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) = 0,
{ rw [hf_zero_rpow, zero_mul],
exact zero_le _, },
have hf_top_rpow : (∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≠ ⊤,
{ by_contra h,
refine hf_top _,
have hp_not_neg : ¬ p < 0, by simp [hpq.nonneg],
simpa [hpq.pos, hp_not_neg] using h, },
refine (ennreal.mul_le_mul_left hf_zero_rpow hf_top_rpow).mpr (le_of_eq _),
congr,
ext1 a,
rw [←ennreal.rpow_mul, hpq.sub_one_mul_conj],
end
lemma lintegral_rpow_add_le_add_snorm_mul_lintegral_rpow_add {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
(hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) :
∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a)^p ∂ μ
≤ ((∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p))
* (∫⁻ a, (f a + g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
calc ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a) * ((f + g) a) ^ (p - 1) ∂μ :
begin
refine lintegral_mono (λ a, _),
dsimp only,
by_cases h_zero : (f + g) a = 0,
{ rw [h_zero, ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos hpq.pos],
exact zero_le _, },
by_cases h_top : (f + g) a = ⊤,
{ rw [h_top, ennreal.top_rpow_of_pos hpq.sub_one_pos, ennreal.top_mul_top],
exact le_top, },
refine le_of_eq _,
nth_rewrite 1 ←ennreal.rpow_one ((f + g) a),
rw [←ennreal.rpow_add _ _ h_zero h_top, add_sub_cancel'_right],
end
... = ∫⁻ (a : α), f a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ + ∫⁻ (a : α), g a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ :
begin
have h_add_m : ae_measurable (λ (a : α), ((f + g) a) ^ (p-1)) μ,
from (hf.add hg).pow_const _,
have h_add_apply : ∫⁻ (a : α), (f + g) a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ
= ∫⁻ (a : α), (f a + g a) * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ,
from rfl,
simp_rw [h_add_apply, add_mul],
rw lintegral_add' (hf.mul h_add_m) (hg.mul h_add_m),
end
... ≤ ((∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p))
* (∫⁻ a, (f a + g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q) :
begin
rw add_mul,
exact add_le_add
(lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow hpq hf (hf.add hg) hf_top)
(lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow hpq hg (hf.add hg) hg_top),
end
end
private lemma lintegral_Lp_add_le_aux {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
(hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ ≠ ⊤)
(h_add_zero : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ ≠ 0) (h_add_top : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ ≠ ⊤) :
(∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a)^p ∂ μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) :=
begin
have hp_not_nonpos : ¬ p ≤ 0, by simp [hpq.pos],
have htop_rpow : (∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂μ)^(1/p) ≠ ⊤,
{ by_contra h,
exact h_add_top (@ennreal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg _ (1/p) (by simp [hpq.nonneg]) h), },
have h0_rpow : (∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ) ^ (1/p) ≠ 0,
by simp [h_add_zero, h_add_top, hpq.nonneg, hp_not_nonpos, -pi.add_apply],
suffices h : 1 ≤ (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a)^p ∂μ) ^ -(1/p)
* ((∫⁻ (a : α), (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ (a : α), (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)),
by rwa [←mul_le_mul_left h0_rpow htop_rpow, ←mul_assoc, ←rpow_add _ _ h_add_zero h_add_top,
←sub_eq_add_neg, _root_.sub_self, rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_one] at h,
have h : ∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a)^p ∂μ
≤ ((∫⁻ (a : α), (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ (a : α), (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p))
* (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/q),
from lintegral_rpow_add_le_add_snorm_mul_lintegral_rpow_add hpq hf hf_top hg hg_top,
have h_one_div_q : 1/q = 1 - 1/p, by { nth_rewrite 1 ←hpq.inv_add_inv_conj, ring, },
simp_rw [h_one_div_q, sub_eq_add_neg 1 (1/p), ennreal.rpow_add _ _ h_add_zero h_add_top,
rpow_one] at h,
nth_rewrite 1 mul_comm at h,
nth_rewrite 0 ←one_mul (∫⁻ (a : α), ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂μ) at h,
rwa [←mul_assoc, ennreal.mul_le_mul_right h_add_zero h_add_top, mul_comm] at h,
end
/-- Minkowski's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0∞`: the `ℒp` seminorm of the sum of two
functions is bounded by the sum of their `ℒp` seminorms. -/
theorem lintegral_Lp_add_le {p : ℝ} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) :
(∫⁻ a, ((f + g) a)^p ∂ μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫⁻ a, (g a)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) :=
begin
have hp_pos : 0 < p, from lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1,
by_cases hf_top : ∫⁻ a, (f a) ^ p ∂μ = ⊤,
{ simp [hf_top, hp_pos], },
by_cases hg_top : ∫⁻ a, (g a) ^ p ∂μ = ⊤,
{ simp [hg_top, hp_pos], },
by_cases h1 : p = 1,
{ refine le_of_eq _,
simp_rw [h1, one_div_one, ennreal.rpow_one],
exact lintegral_add' hf hg, },
have hp1_lt : 1 < p, by { refine lt_of_le_of_ne hp1 _, symmetry, exact h1, },
have hpq := real.is_conjugate_exponent_conjugate_exponent hp1_lt,
by_cases h0 : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ = 0,
{ rw [h0, @ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos (1/p) (by simp [lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1])],
exact zero_le _, },
have htop : ∫⁻ a, ((f+g) a) ^ p ∂ μ ≠ ⊤,
{ rw ← ne.def at hf_top hg_top,
rw ← lt_top_iff_ne_top at hf_top hg_top ⊢,
exact lintegral_rpow_add_lt_top_of_lintegral_rpow_lt_top hf hf_top hg hg_top hp1, },
exact lintegral_Lp_add_le_aux hpq hf hf_top hg hg_top h0 htop,
end
end ennreal
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0`. The integral of the product of two functions
is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem nnreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.is_conjugate_exponent q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, (f a)^p ∂μ)^(1/p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a)^q ∂μ)^(1/q) :=
begin
simp_rw [pi.mul_apply, ennreal.coe_mul],
exact ennreal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal hg.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
end
end lintegral
|
6ddd3290042c96948dd6ab3e4c87ad421a333ace | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/436_lean3.lean | 48036257ced99856e87c2e4cded06baeb54ec821 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 923 | lean | inductive bvar : Type
| mk (n : Nat)
def bvar_eq : bvar → bvar → Bool
| bvar.mk n1, bvar.mk n2 => n1=n2
inductive bExpr : Type
| BLit (b: Bool)
| BVar (v: bvar)
def benv := bvar → Bool
def bEval : bExpr → benv → Bool
| bExpr.BLit b, i => b
| bExpr.BVar v, i => i v
def init_benv : benv := λ v => false
def update_benv : benv → bvar → Bool → benv
| i, v, b => λ v2 => if (bvar_eq v v2) then b else (i v2)
inductive bCmd : Type
| bAssm (v : bvar) (e : bExpr)
| bSeq (c1 c2 : bCmd)
-- Unlike Lean 3, we can have nested match-expressions and still use structural recursion
def cEval : benv → bCmd → benv
| i0, c => match c with
| bCmd.bAssm v e => update_benv i0 v (bEval e i0)
| bCmd.bSeq c1 c2 =>
let i1 := cEval i0 c1
cEval i1 c2
def myFirstProg := bCmd.bAssm (bvar.mk 0) (bExpr.BLit false)
def newEnv :=
cEval init_benv myFirstProg
#eval newEnv (bvar.mk 0)
|
5cad2ba0a72e6321cca1a188a626b465f2aacecc | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/algebra/group/units_hom.lean | bbdfba5c16275161b254cf44178e052c2f08cb57 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,568 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import algebra.group.units algebra.group.hom
/-!
# Lift monoid homomorphisms to group homomorphisms of their units subgroups.
-/
universes u v w
namespace units
variables {M : Type u} {N : Type v} {P : Type w} [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P]
/-- The group homomorphism on units induced by a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[to_additive "The `add_group` homomorphism on `add_unit`s induced by an `add_monoid_hom`."]
def map (f : M →* N) : units M →* units N :=
monoid_hom.mk'
(λ u, ⟨f u.val, f u.inv,
by rw [← f.map_mul, u.val_inv, f.map_one],
by rw [← f.map_mul, u.inv_val, f.map_one]⟩)
(λ x y, ext (f.map_mul x y))
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_map (f : M →* N) (x : units M) : ↑(map f x) = f x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_comp (f : M →* N) (g : N →* P) : map (g.comp f) = (map g).comp (map f) := rfl
variables (M)
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_id : map (monoid_hom.id M) = monoid_hom.id (units M) :=
by ext; refl
/-- Coercion `units M → M` as a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Coercion `add_units M → M` as an add_monoid homomorphism."]
def coe_hom : units M →* M := ⟨coe, coe_one, coe_mul⟩
variable {M}
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_hom_apply (x : units M) : coe_hom M x = ↑x := rfl
/-- If a map `g : M → units N` agrees with a homomorphism `f : M →* N`, then
this map is a monoid homomorphism too. -/
@[to_additive "If a map `g : M → add_units N` agrees with a homomorphism `f : M →+ N`, then this map is an add_monoid homomorphism too."]
def lift_right (f : M →* N) (g : M → units N) (h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) :
M →* units N :=
{ to_fun := g,
map_one' := units.ext $ (h 1).symm ▸ f.map_one,
map_mul' := λ x y, units.ext $ by simp only [h, coe_mul, f.map_mul] }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_lift_right {f : M →* N} {g : M → units N}
(h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) (x) : (lift_right f g h x : N) = f x := h x
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_lift_right_inv {f : M →* N} {g : M → units N}
(h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) (x) : f x * ↑(lift_right f g h x)⁻¹ = 1 :=
by rw [units.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, one_mul, coe_lift_right]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma lift_right_inv_mul {f : M →* N} {g : M → units N}
(h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) (x) : ↑(lift_right f g h x)⁻¹ * f x = 1 :=
by rw [units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_one, coe_lift_right]
end units |
d1998ed7b341d3ed960f299125709b189861ab1f | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/tactic/omega/prove_unsats.lean | 7f0530263b7cd338814dd6bf3619261f62c8d3a4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,085 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Seul Baek. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Seul Baek
-/
/-
A tactic which constructs exprs to discharge
goals of the form `clauses.unsat cs`.
-/
import tactic.omega.find_ees
import tactic.omega.find_scalars
import tactic.omega.lin_comb
namespace omega
open tactic
/-- Return expr of proof that given int is negative -/
meta def prove_neg : int → tactic expr
| (int.of_nat _) := failed
| -[1+ m] := return `(int.neg_succ_lt_zero %%`(m))
lemma forall_mem_repeat_zero_eq_zero (m : nat) :
(∀ x ∈ (list.repeat (0 : int) m), x = (0 : int)) :=
λ x, list.eq_of_mem_repeat
/-- Return expr of proof that elements of (repeat 0 is.length) are all 0 -/
meta def prove_forall_mem_eq_zero (is : list int) : tactic expr :=
return `(forall_mem_repeat_zero_eq_zero is.length)
/-- Return expr of proof that the combination of linear constraints
represented by ks and ts is unsatisfiable -/
meta def prove_unsat_lin_comb (ks : list nat) (ts : list term) : tactic expr :=
let ⟨b,as⟩ := lin_comb ks ts in
do x1 ← prove_neg b,
x2 ← prove_forall_mem_eq_zero as,
to_expr ``(unsat_lin_comb_of %%`(ks) %%`(ts) %%x1 %%x2)
/-- Given a (([],les) : clause), return the expr of a term (t : clause.unsat ([],les)). -/
meta def prove_unsat_ef : clause → tactic expr
| ((_::_), _) := failed
| ([], les) :=
do ks ← find_scalars les,
x ← prove_unsat_lin_comb ks les,
return `(unsat_of_unsat_lin_comb %%`(ks) %%`(les) %%x)
/-- Given a (c : clause), return the expr of a term (t : clause.unsat c) -/
meta def prove_unsat (c : clause) : tactic expr :=
do ee ← find_ees c,
x ← prove_unsat_ef (eq_elim ee c),
return `(unsat_of_unsat_eq_elim %%`(ee) %%`(c) %%x)
/-- Given a (cs : list clause), return the expr of a term (t : clauses.unsat cs) -/
meta def prove_unsats : list clause → tactic expr
| [] := return `(clauses.unsat_nil)
| (p::ps) :=
do x ← prove_unsat p,
xs ← prove_unsats ps,
to_expr ``(clauses.unsat_cons %%`(p) %%`(ps) %%x %%xs)
end omega
|
3bd7345cc36595a7a1d6723e3c547156ad7250d9 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/interactive/partialNamespace.lean | bad8339131ca50792c80a0c32a6b64c81ef95f3d | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 42 | lean | namespace
--^ textDocument/documentSymbol
|
ecf08c086dae4ffc76a262a7e16836a3833ea15f | 83c8119e3298c0bfc53fc195c41a6afb63d01513 | /library/init/algebra/ring.lean | e536a21144bb59011b0bc923ade950cba56e8108 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anfelor/lean | 584b91c4e87a6d95f7630c2a93fb082a87319ed0 | 31cfc2b6bf7d674f3d0f73848b842c9c9869c9f1 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,067,141,310 | 1,585,992,232,000 | 1,585,992,232,000 | 251,683,543 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,676,570,000 | 1,585,676,569,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,871 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.algebra.group
/- Make sure instances defined in this file have lower priority than the ones
defined for concrete structures -/
set_option default_priority 100
set_option old_structure_cmd true
universe u
class distrib (α : Type u) extends has_mul α, has_add α :=
(left_distrib : ∀ a b c : α, a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c))
(right_distrib : ∀ a b c : α, (a + b) * c = (a * c) + (b * c))
variable {α : Type u}
lemma left_distrib [distrib α] (a b c : α) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
distrib.left_distrib a b c
def mul_add := @left_distrib
lemma right_distrib [distrib α] (a b c : α) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
distrib.right_distrib a b c
def add_mul := @right_distrib
class mul_zero_class (α : Type u) extends has_mul α, has_zero α :=
(zero_mul : ∀ a : α, 0 * a = 0)
(mul_zero : ∀ a : α, a * 0 = 0)
@[simp] lemma zero_mul [mul_zero_class α] (a : α) : 0 * a = 0 :=
mul_zero_class.zero_mul a
@[simp] lemma mul_zero [mul_zero_class α] (a : α) : a * 0 = 0 :=
mul_zero_class.mul_zero a
class zero_ne_one_class (α : Type u) extends has_zero α, has_one α :=
(zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1:α))
@[simp]
lemma zero_ne_one [s: zero_ne_one_class α] : 0 ≠ (1:α) :=
@zero_ne_one_class.zero_ne_one α s
@[simp]
lemma one_ne_zero [s: zero_ne_one_class α] : (1:α) ≠ 0 :=
assume h, @zero_ne_one_class.zero_ne_one α s h.symm
/- semiring -/
class semiring (α : Type u) extends add_comm_monoid α, monoid α, distrib α, mul_zero_class α
section semiring
variables [semiring α]
lemma one_add_one_eq_two : 1 + 1 = (2 : α) :=
by unfold bit0
theorem two_mul (n : α) : 2 * n = n + n :=
eq.trans (right_distrib 1 1 n) (by simp)
lemma ne_zero_of_mul_ne_zero_right {a b : α} (h : a * b ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 :=
assume : a = 0,
have a * b = 0, by rw [this, zero_mul],
h this
lemma ne_zero_of_mul_ne_zero_left {a b : α} (h : a * b ≠ 0) : b ≠ 0 :=
assume : b = 0,
have a * b = 0, by rw [this, mul_zero],
h this
lemma distrib_three_right (a b c d : α) : (a + b + c) * d = a * d + b * d + c * d :=
by simp [right_distrib]
end semiring
class comm_semiring (α : Type u) extends semiring α, comm_monoid α
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring α] (a b c : α)
instance comm_semiring_has_dvd : has_dvd α :=
has_dvd.mk (λ a b, ∃ c, b = a * c)
-- TODO: this used to not have c explicit, but that seems to be important
-- for use with tactics, similar to exist.intro
theorem dvd.intro {a b : α} (c : α) (h : a * c = b) : a ∣ b :=
exists.intro c h^.symm
def dvd_of_mul_right_eq := @dvd.intro
theorem dvd.intro_left {a b : α} (c : α) (h : c * a = b) : a ∣ b :=
dvd.intro _ (begin rewrite mul_comm at h, apply h end)
def dvd_of_mul_left_eq := @dvd.intro_left
theorem exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd {a b : α} (h : a ∣ b) : ∃ c, b = a * c := h
theorem dvd.elim {P : Prop} {a b : α} (H₁ : a ∣ b) (H₂ : ∀ c, b = a * c → P) : P :=
exists.elim H₁ H₂
theorem exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd {a b : α} (h : a ∣ b) : ∃ c, b = c * a :=
dvd.elim h (assume c, assume H1 : b = a * c, exists.intro c (eq.trans H1 (mul_comm a c)))
theorem dvd.elim_left {P : Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : ∀ c, b = c * a → P) : P :=
exists.elim (exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd h₁) (assume c, assume h₃ : b = c * a, h₂ c h₃)
@[simp] theorem dvd_refl : a ∣ a :=
dvd.intro 1 (by simp)
local attribute [simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm
theorem dvd_trans {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ c) : a ∣ c :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| ⟨d, (h₃ : b = a * d)⟩, ⟨e, (h₄ : c = b * e)⟩ :=
⟨d * e, show c = a * (d * e), by simp [h₃, h₄]⟩
end
def dvd.trans := @dvd_trans
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_dvd {a : α} (h : 0 ∣ a) : a = 0 :=
dvd.elim h (assume c, assume H' : a = 0 * c, eq.trans H' (zero_mul c))
@[simp] theorem dvd_zero : a ∣ 0 := dvd.intro 0 (by simp)
@[simp] theorem one_dvd : 1 ∣ a := dvd.intro a (by simp)
@[simp] theorem dvd_mul_right : a ∣ a * b := dvd.intro b rfl
@[simp] theorem dvd_mul_left : a ∣ b * a := dvd.intro b (by simp)
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd_left {a b : α} (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a ∣ b * c :=
dvd.elim h (λ d h', begin rw [h', mul_assoc], apply dvd_mul_right end)
theorem dvd_mul_of_dvd_right {a b : α} (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a ∣ c * b :=
begin rw mul_comm, exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h _ end
theorem mul_dvd_mul : ∀ {a b c d : α}, a ∣ b → c ∣ d → a * c ∣ b * d
| a ._ c ._ ⟨e, rfl⟩ ⟨f, rfl⟩ := ⟨e * f, by simp⟩
theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ∣ c) : a * b ∣ a * c :=
mul_dvd_mul (dvd_refl a) h
theorem mul_dvd_mul_right {a b : α} (h : a ∣ b) (c : α) : a * c ∣ b * c :=
mul_dvd_mul h (dvd_refl c)
theorem dvd_add {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b + c :=
dvd.elim h₁ (λ d hd, dvd.elim h₂ (λ e he, dvd.intro (d + e) (by simp [left_distrib, hd, he])))
theorem dvd_of_mul_right_dvd {a b c : α} (h : a * b ∣ c) : a ∣ c :=
dvd.elim h (begin intros d h₁, rw [h₁, mul_assoc], apply dvd_mul_right end)
theorem dvd_of_mul_left_dvd {a b c : α} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c :=
dvd.elim h (λ d ceq, dvd.intro (a * d) (by simp [ceq]))
end comm_semiring
/- ring -/
class ring (α : Type u) extends add_comm_group α, monoid α, distrib α
local attribute [simp] sub_eq_add_neg
lemma ring.mul_zero [ring α] (a : α) : a * 0 = 0 :=
have a * 0 + 0 = a * 0 + a * 0, from calc
a * 0 + 0 = a * (0 + 0) : by simp
... = a * 0 + a * 0 : by rw left_distrib,
show a * 0 = 0, from (add_left_cancel this).symm
lemma ring.zero_mul [ring α] (a : α) : 0 * a = 0 :=
have 0 * a + 0 = 0 * a + 0 * a, from calc
0 * a + 0 = (0 + 0) * a : by simp
... = 0 * a + 0 * a : by rewrite right_distrib,
show 0 * a = 0, from (add_left_cancel this).symm
instance ring.to_semiring [s : ring α] : semiring α :=
{ mul_zero := ring.mul_zero, zero_mul := ring.zero_mul, ..s }
lemma neg_mul_eq_neg_mul [s : ring α] (a b : α) : -(a * b) = -a * b :=
neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero
begin rw [← right_distrib, add_right_neg, zero_mul] end
lemma neg_mul_eq_mul_neg [s : ring α] (a b : α) : -(a * b) = a * -b :=
neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero
begin rw [← left_distrib, add_right_neg, mul_zero] end
@[simp] lemma neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm [s : ring α] (a b : α) : - a * b = - (a * b) :=
eq.symm (neg_mul_eq_neg_mul a b)
@[simp] lemma mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm [s : ring α] (a b : α) : a * - b = - (a * b) :=
eq.symm (neg_mul_eq_mul_neg a b)
lemma neg_mul_neg [s : ring α] (a b : α) : -a * -b = a * b :=
by simp
lemma neg_mul_comm [s : ring α] (a b : α) : -a * b = a * -b :=
by simp
theorem neg_eq_neg_one_mul [s : ring α] (a : α) : -a = -1 * a :=
by simp
lemma mul_sub_left_distrib [s : ring α] (a b c : α) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
calc
a * (b - c) = a * b + a * -c : left_distrib a b (-c)
... = a * b - a * c : by simp
def mul_sub := @mul_sub_left_distrib
lemma mul_sub_right_distrib [s : ring α] (a b c : α) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c :=
calc
(a - b) * c = a * c + -b * c : right_distrib a (-b) c
... = a * c - b * c : by simp
def sub_mul := @mul_sub_right_distrib
class comm_ring (α : Type u) extends ring α, comm_semigroup α
instance comm_ring.to_comm_semiring [s : comm_ring α] : comm_semiring α :=
{ mul_zero := mul_zero, zero_mul := zero_mul, ..s }
section comm_ring
variable [comm_ring α]
local attribute [simp] add_assoc add_comm add_left_comm mul_comm
lemma mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq (a b : α) : a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
begin simp [right_distrib, left_distrib], rw [add_comm (-(a*b)), add_left_comm (a*b)], simp end
lemma mul_self_sub_one_eq (a : α) : a * a - 1 = (a + 1) * (a - 1) :=
begin simp [right_distrib, left_distrib], rw [add_left_comm, add_comm (-a), add_left_comm a], simp end
lemma add_mul_self_eq (a b : α) : (a + b) * (a + b) = a*a + 2*a*b + b*b :=
calc (a + b)*(a + b) = a*a + (1+1)*a*b + b*b : by simp [right_distrib, left_distrib]
... = a*a + 2*a*b + b*b : by rw one_add_one_eq_two
theorem dvd_neg_of_dvd {a b : α} (h : a ∣ b) : (a ∣ -b) :=
dvd.elim h
(assume c, assume : b = a * c,
dvd.intro (-c) (by simp [this]))
theorem dvd_of_dvd_neg {a b : α} (h : a ∣ -b) : (a ∣ b) :=
let t := dvd_neg_of_dvd h in by rwa neg_neg at t
theorem dvd_neg_iff_dvd (a b : α) : (a ∣ -b) ↔ (a ∣ b) :=
⟨dvd_of_dvd_neg, dvd_neg_of_dvd⟩
theorem neg_dvd_of_dvd {a b : α} (h : a ∣ b) : -a ∣ b :=
dvd.elim h
(assume c, assume : b = a * c,
dvd.intro (-c) (by simp [this]))
theorem dvd_of_neg_dvd {a b : α} (h : -a ∣ b) : a ∣ b :=
let t := neg_dvd_of_dvd h in by rwa neg_neg at t
theorem neg_dvd_iff_dvd (a b : α) : (-a ∣ b) ↔ (a ∣ b) :=
⟨dvd_of_neg_dvd, neg_dvd_of_dvd⟩
theorem dvd_sub {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b - c :=
dvd_add h₁ (dvd_neg_of_dvd h₂)
theorem dvd_add_iff_left {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b + c :=
⟨λh₂, dvd_add h₂ h, λH, by have t := dvd_sub H h; rwa add_sub_cancel at t⟩
theorem dvd_add_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ b) : a ∣ c ↔ a ∣ b + c :=
by rw add_comm; exact dvd_add_iff_left h
end comm_ring
class no_zero_divisors (α : Type u) extends has_mul α, has_zero α :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ a b : α, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0)
lemma eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero [no_zero_divisors α] {a b : α} (h : a * b = 0) : a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
no_zero_divisors.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero a b h
lemma eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero [no_zero_divisors α] {a : α} (h : a * a = 0) : a = 0 :=
or.elim (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h) (assume h', h') (assume h', h')
class integral_domain (α : Type u) extends comm_ring α, no_zero_divisors α, zero_ne_one_class α
section integral_domain
variable [integral_domain α]
lemma mul_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_zero {a b : α} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero, λo,
or.elim o (λh, by rw h; apply zero_mul) (λh, by rw h; apply mul_zero)⟩
lemma mul_ne_zero {a b : α} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0 :=
λ h, or.elim (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h) (assume h₃, h₁ h₃) (assume h₄, h₂ h₄)
lemma eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right {a b c : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : b * a = c * a) : b = c :=
have b * a - c * a = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_eq h,
have (b - c) * a = 0, by rw [mul_sub_right_distrib, this],
have b - c = 0, from (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).resolve_right ha,
eq_of_sub_eq_zero this
lemma eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left {a b c : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a * b = a * c) : b = c :=
have a * b - a * c = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_eq h,
have a * (b - c) = 0, by rw [mul_sub_left_distrib, this],
have b - c = 0, from (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).resolve_left ha,
eq_of_sub_eq_zero this
lemma eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right {a b : α} (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : a * b = a) : a = 0 :=
have hb : b - 1 ≠ 0, from
assume : b - 1 = 0,
have b = 0 + 1, from eq_add_of_sub_eq this,
have b = 1, by rwa zero_add at this,
h₁ this,
have a * b - a = 0, by simp [h₂],
have a * (b - 1) = 0, by rwa [mul_sub_left_distrib, mul_one],
show a = 0, from (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).resolve_right hb
lemma eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left {a b : α} (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : b * a = a) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right h₁ (by rwa mul_comm at h₂)
lemma mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff (a b : α) : a * a = b * b ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b :=
iff.intro
(assume : a * a = b * b,
have (a - b) * (a + b) = 0,
by rewrite [mul_comm, ← mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq, this, sub_self],
have a - b = 0 ∨ a + b = 0, from eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this,
or.elim this
(assume : a - b = 0, or.inl (eq_of_sub_eq_zero this))
(assume : a + b = 0, or.inr (eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero this)))
(assume : a = b ∨ a = -b, or.elim this
(assume : a = b, by rewrite this)
(assume : a = -b, by rewrite [this, neg_mul_neg]))
lemma mul_self_eq_one_iff (a : α) : a * a = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 :=
have a * a = 1 * 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1, from mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff a 1,
by rwa mul_one at this
end integral_domain
/- TODO(Leo): remove the following annotations as soon as we have support for arithmetic
in the SMT tactic framework -/
attribute [ematch] add_zero zero_add mul_one one_mul mul_zero zero_mul
|
49d46c8f2c5bb4e1519fe8f90b4e07d6f4400bbc | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/geometry/euclidean/angle/sphere.lean | 27ffa53c11acd8c6ea92c289324b14933d9d1d1c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,819 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.affine
import geometry.euclidean.basic
/-!
# Angles in circles and sphere.
This file proves results about angles in circles and spheres.
-/
noncomputable theory
open finite_dimensional complex
open_locale euclidean_geometry real real_inner_product_space complex_conjugate
namespace orientation
variables {V : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V]
variables [fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : orientation ℝ V (fin 2))
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented vector angle
form. -/
lemma oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y z : V} (hxyne : x ≠ y) (hxzne : x ≠ z)
(hxy : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (hxz : ‖x‖ = ‖z‖) : o.oangle y z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) :=
begin
have hy : y ≠ 0,
{ rintro rfl,
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at hxy,
exact hxyne hxy },
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (hxy.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy),
have hz : z ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (hxz ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx),
calc o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y : (o.oangle_sub_left hx hy hz).symm
... = (π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - z) x) -
(π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - y) x) :
by rw [o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxzne.symm hxz.symm,
o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxyne.symm hxy.symm]
... = (2 : ℤ) • (o.oangle (x - y) x - o.oangle (x - z) x) : by abel
... = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - y) (x - z) :
by rw o.oangle_sub_right (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxyne) (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxzne) hx
... = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) :
by rw [←oangle_neg_neg, neg_sub, neg_sub]
end
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented vector angle
form with radius specified. -/
lemma oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real {x y z : V} (hxyne : x ≠ y) (hxzne : x ≠ z)
{r : ℝ} (hx : ‖x‖ = r) (hy : ‖y‖ = r) (hz : ‖z‖ = r) :
o.oangle y z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) :=
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxyne hxzne (hy.symm ▸ hx) (hz.symm ▸ hx)
/-- Oriented vector angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of
a cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same
result), represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
lemma two_zsmul_oangle_sub_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x₁ x₂ y z : V} (hx₁yne : x₁ ≠ y)
(hx₁zne : x₁ ≠ z) (hx₂yne : x₂ ≠ y) (hx₂zne : x₂ ≠ z) {r : ℝ} (hx₁ : ‖x₁‖ = r) (hx₂ : ‖x₂‖ = r)
(hy : ‖y‖ = r) (hz : ‖z‖ = r) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x₁) (z - x₁) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x₂) (z - x₂) :=
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real hx₁yne hx₁zne hx₁ hy hz ▸
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real hx₂yne hx₂zne hx₂ hy hz
end orientation
namespace euclidean_geometry
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
variables [normed_add_torsor V P] [hd2 : fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [module.oriented ℝ V (fin 2)]
include hd2
local notation `o` := module.oriented.positive_orientation
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented angle version. -/
lemma sphere.oangle_center_eq_two_zsmul_oangle {s : sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
∡ p₁ s.center p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
begin
rw [mem_sphere, @dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at hp₁ hp₂ hp₃,
rw [oangle, oangle, (o).oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real _ _ hp₂ hp₁ hp₃];
simp [hp₂p₁, hp₂p₃]
end
/-- Oriented angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a
cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same result),
represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
lemma sphere.two_zsmul_oangle_eq {s : sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s)
(hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₄ : p₄ ∈ s) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₄ : p₂ ≠ p₄) (hp₃p₁ : p₃ ≠ p₁)
(hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄ :=
begin
rw [mem_sphere, @dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at hp₁ hp₂ hp₃ hp₄,
rw [oangle, oangle, ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p₂ s.center,
←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₄ p₂ s.center,
(o).two_zsmul_oangle_sub_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ _ _ _ hp₂ hp₃ hp₁ hp₄];
simp [hp₂p₁, hp₂p₄, hp₃p₁, hp₃p₄]
end
/-- Oriented angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a
cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same result),
represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
lemma cospherical.two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(h : cospherical ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : set P)) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₄ : p₂ ≠ p₄)
(hp₃p₁ : p₃ ≠ p₁) (hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄ :=
begin
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := cospherical_iff_exists_sphere.1 h,
simp_rw [set.insert_subset, set.singleton_subset_iff, sphere.mem_coe] at hs,
exact sphere.two_zsmul_oangle_eq hs.1 hs.2.1 hs.2.2.1 hs.2.2.2 hp₂p₁ hp₂p₄ hp₃p₁ hp₃p₄
end
end euclidean_geometry
|
36b039e8a667865f9bc4f51efeecbc499bbeda95 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /stage0/src/Lean/Util/Paths.lean | fcf7c02a48ff79c49ddde548088b1ca3112c94aa | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 394 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sebastian Ullrich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Data.Json
import Lean.Util.Path
/-! Communicating Lean search paths between processes -/
namespace Lean
structure LeanPaths where
oleanPath : SearchPath
srcPath : SearchPath
deriving ToJson, FromJson
end Lean
|
ed1101881c2ec9a12030aa9704ff6ba63b31d478 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/probability_theory/independence.lean | 74576e8bd7a686d28506313caa3852f6260ca917 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,226 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import measure_theory.measure.measure_space
import measure_theory.pi_system
import algebra.big_operators.intervals
import data.finset.intervals
/-!
# Independence of sets of sets and measure spaces (σ-algebras)
* A family of sets of sets `π : ι → set (set α)` is independent with respect to a measure `μ` if for
any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets `f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`,
`μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i) `. It will be used for families of π-systems.
* A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of measurable sets they
define is independent. I.e., `m : ι → measurable_space α` is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i)`.
* Independence of sets (or events in probabilistic parlance) is defined as independence of the
measurable space structures they generate: a set `s` generates the measurable space structure with
measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`.
* Independence of functions (or random variables) is also defined as independence of the measurable
space structures they generate: a function `f` for which we have a measurable space `m` on the
codomain generates `measurable_space.comap f m`.
## Main statements
* TODO: `Indep_of_Indep_sets`: if π-systems are independent as sets of sets, then the
measurable space structures they generate are independent.
* `indep_of_indep_sets`: variant with two π-systems.
## Implementation notes
We provide one main definition of independence:
* `Indep_sets`: independence of a family of sets of sets `pi : ι → set (set α)`.
Three other independence notions are defined using `Indep_sets`:
* `Indep`: independence of a family of measurable space structures `m : ι → measurable_space α`,
* `Indep_set`: independence of a family of sets `s : ι → set α`,
* `Indep_fun`: independence of a family of functions. For measurable spaces
`m : Π (i : ι), measurable_space (β i)`, we consider functions `f : Π (i : ι), α → β i`.
Additionally, we provide four corresponding statements for two measurable space structures (resp.
sets of sets, sets, functions) instead of a family. These properties are denoted by the same names
as for a family, but without a capital letter, for example `indep_fun` is the version of `Indep_fun`
for two functions.
The definition of independence for `Indep_sets` uses finite sets (`finset`). An alternative and
equivalent way of defining independence would have been to use countable sets.
TODO: prove that equivalence.
Most of the definitions and lemma in this file list all variables instead of using the `variables`
keyword at the beginning of a section, for example
`lemma indep.symm {α} {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} ...` .
This is intentional, to be able to control the order of the `measurable_space` variables. Indeed
when defining `μ` in the example above, the measurable space used is the last one defined, here
`[measurable_space α]`, and not `m₁` or `m₂`.
## References
* Williams, David. Probability with martingales. Cambridge university press, 1991.
Part A, Chapter 4.
-/
open measure_theory measurable_space
open_locale big_operators classical
namespace probability_theory
section definitions
/-- A family of sets of sets `π : ι → set (set α)` is independent with respect to a measure `μ` if
for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i) `.
It will be used for families of pi_systems. -/
def Indep_sets {α ι} [measurable_space α] (π : ι → set (set α)) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) :
Prop :=
∀ (s : finset ι) {f : ι → set α} (H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i), μ (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i)
/-- Two sets of sets `s₁, s₂` are independent with respect to a measure `μ` if for any sets
`t₁ ∈ p₁, t₂ ∈ s₂`, then `μ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = μ (t₁) * μ (t₂)` -/
def indep_sets {α} [measurable_space α] (s1 s2 : set (set α)) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ t1 t2 : set α, t1 ∈ s1 → t2 ∈ s2 → μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2
/-- A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of measurable sets they
define is independent. `m : ι → measurable_space α` is independent with respect to measure `μ` if
for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i) `. -/
def Indep {α ι} (m : ι → measurable_space α) [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α . volume_tac) :
Prop :=
Indep_sets (λ x, (m x).measurable_set') μ
/-- Two measurable space structures (or σ-algebras) `m₁, m₂` are independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (defined on a third σ-algebra) if for any sets `t₁ ∈ m₁, t₂ ∈ m₂`,
`μ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = μ (t₁) * μ (t₂)` -/
def indep {α} (m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α) [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α . volume_tac) :
Prop :=
indep_sets (m₁.measurable_set') (m₂.measurable_set') μ
/-- A family of sets is independent if the family of measurable space structures they generate is
independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def Indep_set {α ι} [measurable_space α] (s : ι → set α) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (λ i, generate_from {s i}) μ
/-- Two sets are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are independent.
For a set `s`, the generated measurable space structure has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def indep_set {α} [measurable_space α] (s t : set α) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
indep (generate_from {s}) (generate_from {t}) μ
/-- A family of functions defined on the same space `α` and taking values in possibly different
spaces, each with a measurable space structure, is independent if the family of measurable space
structures they generate on `α` is independent. For a function `g` with codomain having measurable
space structure `m`, the generated measurable space structure is `measurable_space.comap g m`. -/
def Indep_fun {α ι} [measurable_space α] {β : ι → Type*} (m : Π (x : ι), measurable_space (β x))
(f : Π (x : ι), α → β x) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (λ x, measurable_space.comap (f x) (m x)) μ
/-- Two functions are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are
independent. For a function `f` with codomain having measurable space structure `m`, the generated
measurable space structure is `measurable_space.comap f m`. -/
def indep_fun {α β γ} [measurable_space α] [mβ : measurable_space β] [mγ : measurable_space γ]
(f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
indep (measurable_space.comap f mβ) (measurable_space.comap g mγ) μ
end definitions
section indep
lemma indep_sets.symm {α} {s₁ s₂ : set (set α)} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h : indep_sets s₁ s₂ μ) :
indep_sets s₂ s₁ μ :=
by { intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2, rw [set.inter_comm, mul_comm], exact h t2 t1 ht2 ht1, }
lemma indep.symm {α} {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h : indep m₁ m₂ μ) :
indep m₂ m₁ μ :=
indep_sets.symm h
lemma indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_left {α} {s₁ s₂ s₃: set (set α)} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep_sets s₁ s₂ μ) (h31 : s₃ ⊆ s₁) :
indep_sets s₃ s₂ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 (set.mem_of_subset_of_mem h31 ht1) ht2
lemma indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_right {α} {s₁ s₂ s₃: set (set α)} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep_sets s₁ s₂ μ) (h32 : s₃ ⊆ s₂) :
indep_sets s₁ s₃ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 ht1 (set.mem_of_subset_of_mem h32 ht2)
lemma indep_of_indep_of_le_left {α} {m₁ m₂ m₃: measurable_space α} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep m₁ m₂ μ) (h31 : m₃ ≤ m₁) :
indep m₃ m₂ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 (h31 _ ht1) ht2
lemma indep_of_indep_of_le_right {α} {m₁ m₂ m₃: measurable_space α} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep m₁ m₂ μ) (h32 : m₃ ≤ m₂) :
indep m₁ m₃ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 ht1 (h32 _ ht2)
lemma indep_sets.union {α} [measurable_space α] {s₁ s₂ s' : set (set α)} {μ : measure α}
(h₁ : indep_sets s₁ s' μ) (h₂ : indep_sets s₂ s' μ) :
indep_sets (s₁ ∪ s₂) s' μ :=
begin
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
cases (set.mem_union _ _ _).mp ht1 with ht1₁ ht1₂,
{ exact h₁ t1 t2 ht1₁ ht2, },
{ exact h₂ t1 t2 ht1₂ ht2, },
end
@[simp] lemma indep_sets.union_iff {α} [measurable_space α] {s₁ s₂ s' : set (set α)}
{μ : measure α} :
indep_sets (s₁ ∪ s₂) s' μ ↔ indep_sets s₁ s' μ ∧ indep_sets s₂ s' μ :=
⟨λ h, ⟨indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_left h (set.subset_union_left s₁ s₂),
indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_left h (set.subset_union_right s₁ s₂)⟩,
λ h, indep_sets.union h.left h.right⟩
lemma indep_sets.Union {α ι} [measurable_space α] {s : ι → set (set α)} {s' : set (set α)}
{μ : measure α} (hyp : ∀ n, indep_sets (s n) s' μ) :
indep_sets (⋃ n, s n) s' μ :=
begin
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
rw set.mem_Union at ht1,
cases ht1 with n ht1,
exact hyp n t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
end
lemma indep_sets.inter {α} [measurable_space α] {s₁ s' : set (set α)} (s₂ : set (set α))
{μ : measure α} (h₁ : indep_sets s₁ s' μ) :
indep_sets (s₁ ∩ s₂) s' μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h₁ t1 t2 ((set.mem_inter_iff _ _ _).mp ht1).left ht2
lemma indep_sets.Inter {α ι} [measurable_space α] {s : ι → set (set α)} {s' : set (set α)}
{μ : measure α} (h : ∃ n, indep_sets (s n) s' μ) :
indep_sets (⋂ n, s n) s' μ :=
by {intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2, cases h with n h, exact h t1 t2 (set.mem_Inter.mp ht1 n) ht2 }
lemma indep_sets_singleton_iff {α} [measurable_space α] {s t : set α} {μ : measure α} :
indep_sets {s} {t} μ ↔ μ (s ∩ t) = μ s * μ t :=
⟨λ h, h s t rfl rfl,
λ h s1 t1 hs1 ht1, by rwa [set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hs1, set.mem_singleton_iff.mp ht1]⟩
end indep
/-! ### Deducing `indep` from `Indep` -/
section from_Indep_to_indep
lemma Indep_sets.indep_sets {α ι} {s : ι → set (set α)} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h_indep : Indep_sets s μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
indep_sets (s i) (s j) μ :=
begin
intros t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂,
have hf_m : ∀ (x : ι), x ∈ {i, j} → (ite (x=i) t₁ t₂) ∈ s x,
{ intros x hx,
cases finset.mem_insert.mp hx with hx hx,
{ simp [hx, ht₁], },
{ simp [finset.mem_singleton.mp hx, hij.symm, ht₂], }, },
have h1 : t₁ = ite (i = i) t₁ t₂, by simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true],
have h2 : t₂ = ite (j = i) t₁ t₂, by simp only [hij.symm, if_false],
have h_inter : (⋂ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ ({i, j} : finset ι)), ite (t = i) t₁ t₂)
= (ite (i = i) t₁ t₂) ∩ (ite (j = i) t₁ t₂),
by simp only [finset.set_bInter_singleton, finset.set_bInter_insert],
have h_prod : (∏ (t : ι) in ({i, j} : finset ι), μ (ite (t = i) t₁ t₂))
= μ (ite (i = i) t₁ t₂) * μ (ite (j = i) t₁ t₂),
by simp only [hij, finset.prod_singleton, finset.prod_insert, not_false_iff,
finset.mem_singleton],
rw h1,
nth_rewrite 1 h2,
nth_rewrite 3 h2,
rw [←h_inter, ←h_prod, h_indep {i, j} hf_m],
end
lemma Indep.indep {α ι} {m : ι → measurable_space α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h_indep : Indep m μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
indep (m i) (m j) μ :=
begin
change indep_sets ((λ x, (m x).measurable_set') i) ((λ x, (m x).measurable_set') j) μ,
exact Indep_sets.indep_sets h_indep hij,
end
end from_Indep_to_indep
/-!
## π-system lemma
Independence of measurable spaces is equivalent to independence of generating π-systems.
-/
section from_measurable_spaces_to_sets_of_sets
/-! ### Independence of measurable space structures implies independence of generating π-systems -/
lemma Indep.Indep_sets {α ι} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} {m : ι → measurable_space α}
{s : ι → set (set α)} (hms : ∀ n, m n = measurable_space.generate_from (s n))
(h_indep : Indep m μ) :
Indep_sets s μ :=
begin
refine (λ S f hfs, h_indep S (λ x hxS, _)),
simp_rw hms x,
exact measurable_set_generate_from (hfs x hxS),
end
lemma indep.indep_sets {α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} {s1 s2 : set (set α)}
(h_indep : indep (generate_from s1) (generate_from s2) μ) :
indep_sets s1 s2 μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 (measurable_set_generate_from ht1) (measurable_set_generate_from ht2)
end from_measurable_spaces_to_sets_of_sets
section from_pi_systems_to_measurable_spaces
/-! ### Independence of generating π-systems implies independence of measurable space structures -/
private lemma indep_sets.indep_aux {α} {m2 : measurable_space α}
{m : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α} [probability_measure μ] {p1 p2 : set (set α)}
(h2 : m2 ≤ m) (hp2 : is_pi_system p2) (hpm2 : m2 = generate_from p2)
(hyp : indep_sets p1 p2 μ) {t1 t2 : set α} (ht1 : t1 ∈ p1) (ht2m : m2.measurable_set' t2) :
μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2 :=
begin
let μ_inter := μ.restrict t1,
let ν := (μ t1) • μ,
have h_univ : μ_inter set.univ = ν set.univ,
by rw [measure.restrict_apply_univ, measure.smul_apply, measure_univ, mul_one],
haveI : finite_measure μ_inter := @restrict.finite_measure α _ t1 μ ⟨measure_lt_top μ t1⟩,
rw [set.inter_comm, ←@measure.restrict_apply α _ μ t1 t2 (h2 t2 ht2m)],
refine ext_on_measurable_space_of_generate_finite m p2 (λ t ht, _) h2 hpm2 hp2 h_univ ht2m,
have ht2 : m.measurable_set' t,
{ refine h2 _ _,
rw hpm2,
exact measurable_set_generate_from ht, },
rw [measure.restrict_apply ht2, measure.smul_apply, set.inter_comm],
exact hyp t1 t ht1 ht,
end
lemma indep_sets.indep {α} {m1 m2 : measurable_space α} {m : measurable_space α}
{μ : measure α} [probability_measure μ] {p1 p2 : set (set α)} (h1 : m1 ≤ m) (h2 : m2 ≤ m)
(hp1 : is_pi_system p1) (hp2 : is_pi_system p2) (hpm1 : m1 = generate_from p1)
(hpm2 : m2 = generate_from p2) (hyp : indep_sets p1 p2 μ) :
indep m1 m2 μ :=
begin
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
let μ_inter := μ.restrict t2,
let ν := (μ t2) • μ,
have h_univ : μ_inter set.univ = ν set.univ,
by rw [measure.restrict_apply_univ, measure.smul_apply, measure_univ, mul_one],
haveI : finite_measure μ_inter := @restrict.finite_measure α _ t2 μ ⟨measure_lt_top μ t2⟩,
rw [mul_comm, ←@measure.restrict_apply α _ μ t2 t1 (h1 t1 ht1)],
refine ext_on_measurable_space_of_generate_finite m p1 (λ t ht, _) h1 hpm1 hp1 h_univ ht1,
have ht1 : m.measurable_set' t,
{ refine h1 _ _,
rw hpm1,
exact measurable_set_generate_from ht, },
rw [measure.restrict_apply ht1, measure.smul_apply, mul_comm],
exact indep_sets.indep_aux h2 hp2 hpm2 hyp ht ht2,
end
end from_pi_systems_to_measurable_spaces
section indep_set
/-! ### Independence of measurable sets
We prove the following equivalences on `indep_set`, for measurable sets `s, t`.
* `indep_set s t μ ↔ μ (s ∩ t) = μ s * μ t`,
* `indep_set s t μ ↔ indep_sets {s} {t} μ`.
-/
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] {s t : set α} (S T : set (set α))
lemma indep_set_iff_indep_sets_singleton (hs_meas : measurable_set s) (ht_meas : measurable_set t)
(μ : measure α . volume_tac) [probability_measure μ] :
indep_set s t μ ↔ indep_sets {s} {t} μ :=
⟨indep.indep_sets, λ h, indep_sets.indep
(generate_from_le (λ u hu, by rwa set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hu))
(generate_from_le (λ u hu, by rwa set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hu)) (is_pi_system.singleton s)
(is_pi_system.singleton t) rfl rfl h⟩
lemma indep_set_iff_measure_inter_eq_mul (hs_meas : measurable_set s) (ht_meas : measurable_set t)
(μ : measure α . volume_tac) [probability_measure μ] :
indep_set s t μ ↔ μ (s ∩ t) = μ s * μ t :=
(indep_set_iff_indep_sets_singleton hs_meas ht_meas μ).trans indep_sets_singleton_iff
lemma indep_sets.indep_set_of_mem (hs : s ∈ S) (ht : t ∈ T) (hs_meas : measurable_set s)
(ht_meas : measurable_set t) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) [probability_measure μ]
(h_indep : indep_sets S T μ) :
indep_set s t μ :=
(indep_set_iff_measure_inter_eq_mul hs_meas ht_meas μ).mpr (h_indep s t hs ht)
end indep_set
end probability_theory
|
b94c6f278d110ae35c95b13b41c0bad15e81d5d4 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/playground/simpleTypes.lean | 237e69588619afc73a22e8be79a615e7ed595620 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,915 | lean | import Lean
notation "◾" => lcErased
notation "⊤" => lcAny
open Lean Compiler Meta
def test (declName : Name) : MetaM Unit := do
IO.println s!"{declName} : {← ppExpr (← getDeclLCNFType declName)}"
inductive Vec (α : Type u) : Nat → Type u
| nil : Vec α 0
| cons : α → Vec α n → Vec α (n+1)
def Vec.zip : Vec α n → Vec β n → Vec (α × β) n
| .cons a as, .cons b bs => .cons (a, b) (zip as bs)
| .nil, .nil => .nil
def Tuple (α : Type u) : Nat → Type u
| 0 => PUnit
| 1 => α
| n+2 => α × Tuple α n
def mkConstTuple (a : α) : (n : Nat) → Tuple α n
| 0 => ⟨⟩
| 1 => a
| n+2 => (a, mkConstTuple a n)
#eval test ``Vec.zip
#eval test ``mkConstTuple
#eval test ``Fin.add
#eval test ``Vec.cons
#eval test ``Eq.rec
#eval test ``GetElem.getElem
inductive HList {α : Type v} (β : α → Type u) : List α → Type (max u v)
| nil : HList β []
| cons : β i → HList β is → HList β (i::is)
infix:67 " :: " => HList.cons
inductive Member : α → List α → Type _
| head : Member a (a::as)
| tail : Member a bs → Member a (b::bs)
def HList.get : HList β is → Member i is → β i
| a::as, .head => a
| _::as, .tail h => as.get h
inductive Ty where
| nat
| fn : Ty → Ty → Ty
abbrev Ty.denote : Ty → Type
| nat => Nat
| fn a b => a.denote → b.denote
inductive Term : List Ty → Ty → Type
| var : Member ty ctx → Term ctx ty
| const : Nat → Term ctx .nat
| plus : Term ctx .nat → Term ctx .nat → Term ctx .nat
| app : Term ctx (.fn dom ran) → Term ctx dom → Term ctx ran
| lam : Term (dom :: ctx) ran → Term ctx (.fn dom ran)
| «let» : Term ctx ty₁ → Term (ty₁ :: ctx) ty₂ → Term ctx ty₂
def Term.denote : Term ctx ty → HList Ty.denote ctx → ty.denote
| var h, env => env.get h
| const n, _ => n
| plus a b, env => a.denote env + b.denote env
| app f a, env => f.denote env (a.denote env)
| lam b, env => fun x => b.denote (x :: env)
| «let» a b, env => b.denote (a.denote env :: env)
def Term.constFold : Term ctx ty → Term ctx ty
| const n => const n
| var h => var h
| app f a => app f.constFold a.constFold
| lam b => lam b.constFold
| «let» a b => «let» a.constFold b.constFold
| plus a b =>
match a.constFold, b.constFold with
| const n, const m => const (n+m)
| a', b' => plus a' b'
#eval test ``Term.constFold
#eval test ``Term.denote
#eval test ``HList.get
#eval test ``Member.head
#eval test ``Ty.denote
#eval test ``MonadControl.liftWith
#eval test ``MonadControl.restoreM
#eval test ``Decidable.casesOn
#eval test ``getConstInfo
#eval test ``instMonadMetaM
#eval test ``Lean.Meta.inferType
#eval test ``Elab.Term.elabTerm
#eval test ``Nat.add
structure Magma where
carrier : Type
mul : carrier → carrier → carrier
#eval test ``Magma.mul
|
1217ffd5e902590c1ca62990ef567554ea4debaf | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/terminal.lean | c62e6e9261b7e3bc6c25127afb284533da93d70a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,645 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.pempty
import category_theory.limits.has_limits
import category_theory.epi_mono
/-!
# Initial and terminal objects in a category.
## References
* [Stacks: Initial and final objects](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002B)
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u u₂
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
/-- Construct a cone for the empty diagram given an object. -/
@[simps] def as_empty_cone (X : C) : cone (functor.empty C) := { X := X, π := by tidy }
/-- Construct a cocone for the empty diagram given an object. -/
@[simps] def as_empty_cocone (X : C) : cocone (functor.empty C) := { X := X, ι := by tidy }
/-- `X` is terminal if the cone it induces on the empty diagram is limiting. -/
abbreviation is_terminal (X : C) := is_limit (as_empty_cone X)
/-- `X` is initial if the cocone it induces on the empty diagram is colimiting. -/
abbreviation is_initial (X : C) := is_colimit (as_empty_cocone X)
/-- An object `Y` is terminal if for every `X` there is a unique morphism `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def is_terminal.of_unique (Y : C) [h : Π X : C, unique (X ⟶ Y)] : is_terminal Y :=
{ lift := λ s, (h s.X).default }
/-- Transport a term of type `is_terminal` across an isomorphism. -/
def is_terminal.of_iso {Y Z : C} (hY : is_terminal Y) (i : Y ≅ Z) : is_terminal Z :=
is_limit.of_iso_limit hY
{ hom := { hom := i.hom },
inv := { hom := i.symm.hom } }
/-- An object `X` is initial if for every `Y` there is a unique morphism `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def is_initial.of_unique (X : C) [h : Π Y : C, unique (X ⟶ Y)] : is_initial X :=
{ desc := λ s, (h s.X).default }
/-- Transport a term of type `is_initial` across an isomorphism. -/
def is_initial.of_iso {X Y : C} (hX : is_initial X) (i : X ≅ Y) : is_initial Y :=
is_colimit.of_iso_colimit hX
{ hom := { hom := i.hom },
inv := { hom := i.symm.hom } }
/-- Give the morphism to a terminal object from any other. -/
def is_terminal.from {X : C} (t : is_terminal X) (Y : C) : Y ⟶ X :=
t.lift (as_empty_cone Y)
/-- Any two morphisms to a terminal object are equal. -/
lemma is_terminal.hom_ext {X Y : C} (t : is_terminal X) (f g : Y ⟶ X) : f = g :=
t.hom_ext (by tidy)
@[simp] lemma is_terminal.comp_from {Z : C} (t : is_terminal Z) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ t.from Y = t.from X :=
t.hom_ext _ _
@[simp] lemma is_terminal.from_self {X : C} (t : is_terminal X) : t.from X = 𝟙 X :=
t.hom_ext _ _
/-- Give the morphism from an initial object to any other. -/
def is_initial.to {X : C} (t : is_initial X) (Y : C) : X ⟶ Y :=
t.desc (as_empty_cocone Y)
/-- Any two morphisms from an initial object are equal. -/
lemma is_initial.hom_ext {X Y : C} (t : is_initial X) (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f = g :=
t.hom_ext (by tidy)
@[simp] lemma is_initial.to_comp {X : C} (t : is_initial X) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
t.to Y ≫ f = t.to Z :=
t.hom_ext _ _
@[simp] lemma is_initial.to_self {X : C} (t : is_initial X) : t.to X = 𝟙 X :=
t.hom_ext _ _
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is split mono. -/
def is_terminal.split_mono_from {X Y : C} (t : is_terminal X) (f : X ⟶ Y) : split_mono f :=
⟨t.from _, t.hom_ext _ _⟩
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is split epi. -/
def is_initial.split_epi_to {X Y : C} (t : is_initial X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : split_epi f :=
⟨t.to _, t.hom_ext _ _⟩
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is mono. -/
lemma is_terminal.mono_from {X Y : C} (t : is_terminal X) (f : X ⟶ Y) : mono f :=
by haveI := t.split_mono_from f; apply_instance
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is epi. -/
lemma is_initial.epi_to {X Y : C} (t : is_initial X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : epi f :=
by haveI := t.split_epi_to f; apply_instance
/-- If `T` and `T'` are terminal, they are isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def is_terminal.unique_up_to_iso {T T' : C} (hT : is_terminal T) (hT' : is_terminal T') : T ≅ T' :=
{ hom := hT'.from _,
inv := hT.from _ }
/-- If `I` and `I'` are initial, they are isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def is_initial.unique_up_to_iso {I I' : C} (hI : is_initial I) (hI' : is_initial I') : I ≅ I' :=
{ hom := hI.to _,
inv := hI'.to _ }
variable (C)
/--
A category has a terminal object if it has a limit over the empty diagram.
Use `has_terminal_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbreviation has_terminal := has_limits_of_shape (discrete pempty) C
/--
A category has an initial object if it has a colimit over the empty diagram.
Use `has_initial_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbreviation has_initial := has_colimits_of_shape (discrete pempty) C
/--
An arbitrary choice of terminal object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊤_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism from any object.
-/
abbreviation terminal [has_terminal C] : C := limit (functor.empty C)
/--
An arbitrary choice of initial object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊥_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism to any object.
-/
abbreviation initial [has_initial C] : C := colimit (functor.empty C)
notation `⊤_ ` C:20 := terminal C
notation `⊥_ ` C:20 := initial C
section
variables {C}
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has a terminal object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism to it from any other object. -/
lemma has_terminal_of_unique (X : C) [h : Π Y : C, unique (Y ⟶ X)] : has_terminal C :=
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit.mk
{ cone := { X := X, π := { app := pempty.rec _ } },
is_limit := { lift := λ s, (h s.X).default } } }
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has an initial object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism from it to any other object. -/
lemma has_initial_of_unique (X : C) [h : Π Y : C, unique (X ⟶ Y)] : has_initial C :=
{ has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit.mk
{ cocone := { X := X, ι := { app := pempty.rec _ } },
is_colimit := { desc := λ s, (h s.X).default } } }
/-- The map from an object to the terminal object. -/
abbreviation terminal.from [has_terminal C] (P : C) : P ⟶ ⊤_ C :=
limit.lift (functor.empty C) (as_empty_cone P)
/-- The map to an object from the initial object. -/
abbreviation initial.to [has_initial C] (P : C) : ⊥_ C ⟶ P :=
colimit.desc (functor.empty C) (as_empty_cocone P)
instance unique_to_terminal [has_terminal C] (P : C) : unique (P ⟶ ⊤_ C) :=
{ default := terminal.from P,
uniq := λ m, by { apply limit.hom_ext, rintro ⟨⟩ } }
instance unique_from_initial [has_initial C] (P : C) : unique (⊥_ C ⟶ P) :=
{ default := initial.to P,
uniq := λ m, by { apply colimit.hom_ext, rintro ⟨⟩ } }
@[simp] lemma terminal.comp_from [has_terminal C] {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
f ≫ terminal.from Q = terminal.from P :=
by tidy
@[simp] lemma initial.to_comp [has_initial C] {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
initial.to P ≫ f = initial.to Q :=
by tidy
/-- A terminal object is terminal. -/
def terminal_is_terminal [has_terminal C] : is_terminal (⊤_ C) :=
{ lift := λ s, terminal.from _ }
/-- An initial object is initial. -/
def initial_is_initial [has_initial C] : is_initial (⊥_ C) :=
{ desc := λ s, initial.to _ }
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is split mono. -/
instance terminal.split_mono_from {Y : C} [has_terminal C] (f : ⊤_ C ⟶ Y) : split_mono f :=
is_terminal.split_mono_from terminal_is_terminal _
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is split epi. -/
instance initial.split_epi_to {Y : C} [has_initial C] (f : Y ⟶ ⊥_ C) : split_epi f :=
is_initial.split_epi_to initial_is_initial _
/-- An initial object is terminal in the opposite category. -/
def terminal_op_of_initial {X : C} (t : is_initial X) : is_terminal (opposite.op X) :=
{ lift := λ s, (t.to s.X.unop).op,
uniq' := λ s m w, quiver.hom.unop_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- An initial object in the opposite category is terminal in the original category. -/
def terminal_unop_of_initial {X : Cᵒᵖ} (t : is_initial X) : is_terminal X.unop :=
{ lift := λ s, (t.to (opposite.op s.X)).unop,
uniq' := λ s m w, quiver.hom.op_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- A terminal object is initial in the opposite category. -/
def initial_op_of_terminal {X : C} (t : is_terminal X) : is_initial (opposite.op X) :=
{ desc := λ s, (t.from s.X.unop).op,
uniq' := λ s m w, quiver.hom.unop_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- A terminal object in the opposite category is initial in the original category. -/
def initial_unop_of_terminal {X : Cᵒᵖ} (t : is_terminal X) : is_initial X.unop :=
{ desc := λ s, (t.from (opposite.op s.X)).unop,
uniq' := λ s m w, quiver.hom.op_inj (t.hom_ext _ _) }
/-- A category is a `initial_mono_class` if the canonical morphism of an initial object is a
monomorphism. In practice, this is most useful when given an arbitrary morphism out of the chosen
initial object, see `initial.mono_from`.
Given a terminal object, this is equivalent to the assumption that the unique morphism from initial
to terminal is a monomorphism, which is the second of Freyd's axioms for an AT category.
TODO: This is a condition satisfied by categories with zero objects and morphisms.
-/
class initial_mono_class (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] : Prop :=
(is_initial_mono_from : ∀ {I} (X : C) (hI : is_initial I), mono (hI.to X))
lemma is_initial.mono_from [initial_mono_class C] {I} {X : C} (hI : is_initial I) (f : I ⟶ X) :
mono f :=
begin
rw hI.hom_ext f (hI.to X),
apply initial_mono_class.is_initial_mono_from,
end
@[priority 100]
instance initial.mono_from [has_initial C] [initial_mono_class C] (X : C) (f : ⊥_ C ⟶ X) :
mono f :=
initial_is_initial.mono_from f
/-- To show a category is a `initial_mono_class` it suffices to give an initial object such that
every morphism out of it is a monomorphism. -/
lemma initial_mono_class.of_is_initial {I : C} (hI : is_initial I) (h : ∀ X, mono (hI.to X)) :
initial_mono_class C :=
{ is_initial_mono_from := λ I' X hI',
begin
rw hI'.hom_ext (hI'.to X) ((hI'.unique_up_to_iso hI).hom ≫ hI.to X),
apply mono_comp,
end }
/-- To show a category is a `initial_mono_class` it suffices to show every morphism out of the
initial object is a monomorphism. -/
lemma initial_mono_class.of_initial [has_initial C] (h : ∀ X : C, mono (initial.to X)) :
initial_mono_class C :=
initial_mono_class.of_is_initial initial_is_initial h
/-- To show a category is a `initial_mono_class` it suffices to show the unique morphism from an
initial object to a terminal object is a monomorphism. -/
lemma initial_mono_class.of_is_terminal {I T : C} (hI : is_initial I) (hT : is_terminal T)
(f : mono (hI.to T)) :
initial_mono_class C :=
initial_mono_class.of_is_initial hI (λ X, mono_of_mono_fac (hI.hom_ext (_ ≫ hT.from X) (hI.to T)))
/-- To show a category is a `initial_mono_class` it suffices to show the unique morphism from the
initial object to a terminal object is a monomorphism. -/
lemma initial_mono_class.of_terminal [has_initial C] [has_terminal C]
(h : mono (initial.to (⊤_ C))) :
initial_mono_class C :=
initial_mono_class.of_is_terminal initial_is_initial terminal_is_terminal h
section comparison
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v} D] (G : C ⥤ D)
/--
The comparison morphism from the image of a terminal object to the terminal object in the target
category.
This is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves terminal objects, see
`category_theory.limits.preserves_terminal.of_iso_comparison`.
-/
def terminal_comparison [has_terminal C] [has_terminal D] :
G.obj (⊤_ C) ⟶ ⊤_ D :=
terminal.from _
/--
The comparison morphism from the initial object in the target category to the image of the initial
object.
-/
-- TODO: Show this is an isomorphism if and only if `G` preserves initial objects.
def initial_comparison [has_initial C] [has_initial D] :
⊥_ D ⟶ G.obj (⊥_ C) :=
initial.to _
end comparison
variables {J : Type v} [small_category J]
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given an initial object of `J`, construct a cone for `J`.
In `limit_of_diagram_initial` we show it is a limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def cone_of_diagram_initial
{X : J} (tX : is_initial X) (F : J ⥤ C) : cone F :=
{ X := F.obj X,
π :=
{ app := λ j, F.map (tX.to j),
naturality' := λ j j' k,
begin
dsimp,
rw [← F.map_comp, category.id_comp, tX.hom_ext (tX.to j ≫ k) (tX.to j')],
end } }
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given an initial object of `J`, show the cone
`cone_of_diagram_initial` is a limit. -/
def limit_of_diagram_initial
{X : J} (tX : is_initial X) (F : J ⥤ C) :
is_limit (cone_of_diagram_initial tX F) :=
{ lift := λ s, s.π.app X,
uniq' := λ s m w,
begin
rw [← w X, cone_of_diagram_initial_π_app, tX.hom_ext (tX.to X) (𝟙 _)],
dsimp, simp -- See note [dsimp, simp]
end}
-- This is reducible to allow usage of lemmas about `cone_point_unique_up_to_iso`.
/-- For a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, if `J` has an initial object then the image of it is isomorphic
to the limit of `F`. -/
@[reducible]
def limit_of_initial (F : J ⥤ C)
[has_initial J] [has_limit F] :
limit F ≅ F.obj (⊥_ J) :=
is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso
(limit.is_limit _)
(limit_of_diagram_initial initial_is_initial F)
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given a terminal object of `J`, construct a cocone for `J`.
In `colimit_of_diagram_terminal` we show it is a colimit cocone. -/
@[simps]
def cocone_of_diagram_terminal
{X : J} (tX : is_terminal X) (F : J ⥤ C) : cocone F :=
{ X := F.obj X,
ι :=
{ app := λ j, F.map (tX.from j),
naturality' := λ j j' k,
begin
dsimp,
rw [← F.map_comp, category.comp_id, tX.hom_ext (k ≫ tX.from j') (tX.from j)],
end } }
/-- From a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, given a terminal object of `J`, show the cocone
`cocone_of_diagram_terminal` is a colimit. -/
def colimit_of_diagram_terminal
{X : J} (tX : is_terminal X) (F : J ⥤ C) :
is_colimit (cocone_of_diagram_terminal tX F) :=
{ desc := λ s, s.ι.app X,
uniq' := λ s m w,
by { rw [← w X, cocone_of_diagram_terminal_ι_app, tX.hom_ext (tX.from X) (𝟙 _)], simp } }
-- This is reducible to allow usage of lemmas about `cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso`.
/-- For a functor `F : J ⥤ C`, if `J` has a terminal object then the image of it is isomorphic
to the colimit of `F`. -/
@[reducible]
def colimit_of_terminal (F : J ⥤ C)
[has_terminal J] [has_colimit F] :
colimit F ≅ F.obj (⊤_ J) :=
is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso
(colimit.is_colimit _)
(colimit_of_diagram_terminal terminal_is_terminal F)
/--
If `j` is initial in the index category, then the map `limit.π F j` is an isomorphism.
-/
lemma is_iso_π_of_is_initial {j : J} (I : is_initial j) (F : J ⥤ C) [has_limit F] :
is_iso (limit.π F j) :=
⟨⟨limit.lift _ (cone_of_diagram_initial I F), ⟨by { ext, simp }, by simp⟩⟩⟩
instance is_iso_π_initial [has_initial J] (F : J ⥤ C) [has_limit F] :
is_iso (limit.π F (⊥_ J)) :=
is_iso_π_of_is_initial (initial_is_initial) F
/--
If `j` is terminal in the index category, then the map `colimit.ι F j` is an isomorphism.
-/
lemma is_iso_ι_of_is_terminal {j : J} (I : is_terminal j) (F : J ⥤ C) [has_colimit F] :
is_iso (colimit.ι F j) :=
⟨⟨colimit.desc _ (cocone_of_diagram_terminal I F), ⟨by simp, by { ext, simp }⟩⟩⟩
instance is_iso_ι_terminal [has_terminal J] (F : J ⥤ C) [has_colimit F] :
is_iso (colimit.ι F (⊤_ J)) :=
is_iso_ι_of_is_terminal (terminal_is_terminal) F
end
end category_theory.limits
|
0a614d04ba3013f866fd67f77be91c9d0eb7124f | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/calculus/inverse.lean | 3ef859903176b99502bd17af3d0f1dc5f04fec85 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,378 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.calculus.cont_diff
import tactic.ring_exp
import analysis.normed_space.banach
import topology.local_homeomorph
/-!
# Inverse function theorem
In this file we prove the inverse function theorem. It says that if a map `f : E → F`
has an invertible strict derivative `f'` at `a`, then it is locally invertible,
and the inverse function has derivative `f' ⁻¹`.
We define `has_strict_deriv_at.to_local_homeomorph` that repacks a function `f`
with a `hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' a`, `f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F`, into a `local_homeomorph`.
The `to_fun` of this `local_homeomorph` is `defeq` to `f`, so one can apply theorems
about `local_homeomorph` to `hf.to_local_homeomorph f`, and get statements about `f`.
Then we define `has_strict_fderiv_at.local_inverse` to be the `inv_fun` of this `local_homeomorph`,
and prove two versions of the inverse function theorem:
* `has_strict_fderiv_at.to_local_inverse`: if `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in the
strict sense (`hf`), then `hf.local_inverse f f' a` has derivative `f'.symm` at `f a` in the
strict sense;
* `has_strict_fderiv_at.to_local_left_inverse`: if `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in
the strict sense and `g` is locally left inverse to `f` near `a`, then `g` has derivative
`f'.symm` at `f a` in the strict sense.
In the one-dimensional case we reformulate these theorems in terms of `has_strict_deriv_at` and
`f'⁻¹`.
We also reformulate the theorems in terms of `cont_diff`, to give that `C^k` (respectively,
smooth) inputs give `C^k` (smooth) inverses. These versions require that continuous
differentiability implies strict differentiability; this is false over a general field, true over
`ℝ` or `ℂ` and implemented here assuming `is_R_or_C 𝕂`.
Some related theorems, providing the derivative and higher regularity assuming that we already know
the inverse function, are formulated in `fderiv.lean`, `deriv.lean`, and `cont_diff.lean`.
## Notations
In the section about `approximates_linear_on` we introduce some `local notation` to make formulas
shorter:
* by `N` we denote `‖f'⁻¹‖`;
* by `g` we denote the auxiliary contracting map `x ↦ x + f'.symm (y - f x)` used to prove that
`{x | f x = y}` is nonempty.
## Tags
derivative, strictly differentiable, continuously differentiable, smooth, inverse function
-/
open function set filter metric
open_locale topological_space classical nnreal
noncomputable theory
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
variables {G : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
variables {G' : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group G'] [normed_space 𝕜 G']
variables {ε : ℝ}
open asymptotics filter metric set
open continuous_linear_map (id)
/-!
### Non-linear maps close to affine maps
In this section we study a map `f` such that `‖f x - f y - f' (x - y)‖ ≤ c * ‖x - y‖` on an open set
`s`, where `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` is a continuous linear map and `c` is suitably small. Maps of this type
behave like `f a + f' (x - a)` near each `a ∈ s`.
When `f'` is onto, we show that `f` is locally onto.
When `f'` is a continuous linear equiv, we show that `f` is a homeomorphism
between `s` and `f '' s`. More precisely, we define `approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph` to
be a `local_homeomorph` with `to_fun = f`, `source = s`, and `target = f '' s`.
Maps of this type naturally appear in the proof of the inverse function theorem (see next section),
and `approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph` will imply that the locally inverse function
exists.
We define this auxiliary notion to split the proof of the inverse function theorem into small
lemmas. This approach makes it possible
- to prove a lower estimate on the size of the domain of the inverse function;
- to reuse parts of the proofs in the case if a function is not strictly differentiable. E.g., for a
function `f : E × F → G` with estimates on `f x y₁ - f x y₂` but not on `f x₁ y - f x₂ y`.
-/
/-- We say that `f` approximates a continuous linear map `f'` on `s` with constant `c`,
if `‖f x - f y - f' (x - y)‖ ≤ c * ‖x - y‖` whenever `x, y ∈ s`.
This predicate is defined to facilitate the splitting of the inverse function theorem into small
lemmas. Some of these lemmas can be useful, e.g., to prove that the inverse function is defined
on a specific set. -/
def approximates_linear_on (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : set E) (c : ℝ≥0) : Prop :=
∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ‖f x - f y - f' (x - y)‖ ≤ c * ‖x - y‖
@[simp] lemma approximates_linear_on_empty (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (c : ℝ≥0) :
approximates_linear_on f f' ∅ c :=
by simp [approximates_linear_on]
namespace approximates_linear_on
variables [cs : complete_space E] {f : E → F}
/-! First we prove some properties of a function that `approximates_linear_on` a (not necessarily
invertible) continuous linear map. -/
section
variables {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {s t : set E} {c c' : ℝ≥0}
theorem mono_num (hc : c ≤ c') (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
approximates_linear_on f f' s c' :=
λ x hx y hy, le_trans (hf x hx y hy) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hc $ norm_nonneg _)
theorem mono_set (hst : s ⊆ t) (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' t c) :
approximates_linear_on f f' s c :=
λ x hx y hy, hf x (hst hx) y (hst hy)
lemma approximates_linear_on_iff_lipschitz_on_with
{f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {s : set E} {c : ℝ≥0} :
approximates_linear_on f f' s c ↔ lipschitz_on_with c (f - f') s :=
begin
have : ∀ x y, f x - f y - f' (x - y) = (f - f') x - (f - f') y,
{ assume x y, simp only [map_sub, pi.sub_apply], abel },
simp only [this, lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le, approximates_linear_on],
end
alias approximates_linear_on_iff_lipschitz_on_with ↔
lipschitz_on_with _root_.lipschitz_on_with.approximates_linear_on
lemma lipschitz_sub (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
lipschitz_with c (λ x : s, f x - f' x) :=
begin
refine lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul (λ x y, _),
rw [dist_eq_norm, subtype.dist_eq, dist_eq_norm],
convert hf x x.2 y y.2 using 2,
rw [f'.map_sub], abel
end
protected lemma lipschitz (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
lipschitz_with (‖f'‖₊ + c) (s.restrict f) :=
by simpa only [restrict_apply, add_sub_cancel'_right]
using (f'.lipschitz.restrict s).add hf.lipschitz_sub
protected lemma continuous (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
continuous (s.restrict f) :=
hf.lipschitz.continuous
protected lemma continuous_on (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
continuous_on f s :=
continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 hf.continuous
end
section locally_onto
/-!
We prove that a function which is linearly approximated by a continuous linear map with a nonlinear
right inverse is locally onto. This will apply to the case where the approximating map is a linear
equivalence, for the local inverse theorem, but also whenever the approximating map is onto,
by Banach's open mapping theorem. -/
include cs
variables {s : set E} {c : ℝ≥0} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
/-- If a function is linearly approximated by a continuous linear map with a (possibly nonlinear)
right inverse, then it is locally onto: a ball of an explicit radius is included in the image
of the map. -/
theorem surj_on_closed_ball_of_nonlinear_right_inverse
(hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) (f'symm : f'.nonlinear_right_inverse)
{ε : ℝ} {b : E} (ε0 : 0 ≤ ε) (hε : closed_ball b ε ⊆ s) :
surj_on f (closed_ball b ε) (closed_ball (f b) (((f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ)⁻¹ - c) * ε)) :=
begin
assume y hy,
cases le_or_lt (f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ) ⁻¹ c with hc hc,
{ refine ⟨b, by simp [ε0], _⟩,
have : dist y (f b) ≤ 0 :=
(mem_closed_ball.1 hy).trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (by linarith) ε0),
simp only [dist_le_zero] at this,
rw this },
have If' : (0 : ℝ) < f'symm.nnnorm,
by { rw [← inv_pos], exact (nnreal.coe_nonneg _).trans_lt hc },
have Icf' : (c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm < 1, by rwa [inv_eq_one_div, lt_div_iff If'] at hc,
have Jf' : (f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ) ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt If',
have Jcf' : (1 : ℝ) - c * f'symm.nnnorm ≠ 0, by { apply ne_of_gt, linarith },
/- We have to show that `y` can be written as `f x` for some `x ∈ closed_ball b ε`.
The idea of the proof is to apply the Banach contraction principle to the map
`g : x ↦ x + f'symm (y - f x)`, as a fixed point of this map satisfies `f x = y`.
When `f'symm` is a genuine linear inverse, `g` is a contracting map. In our case, since `f'symm`
is nonlinear, this map is not contracting (it is not even continuous), but still the proof of
the contraction theorem holds: `uₙ = gⁿ b` is a Cauchy sequence, converging exponentially fast
to the desired point `x`. Instead of appealing to general results, we check this by hand.
The main point is that `f (u n)` becomes exponentially close to `y`, and therefore
`dist (u (n+1)) (u n)` becomes exponentally small, making it possible to get an inductive
bound on `dist (u n) b`, from which one checks that `u n` stays in the ball on which one has a
control. Therefore, the bound can be checked at the next step, and so on inductively.
-/
set g := λ x, x + f'symm (y - f x) with hg,
set u := λ (n : ℕ), g ^[n] b with hu,
have usucc : ∀ n, u (n + 1) = g (u n), by simp [hu, ← iterate_succ_apply' g _ b],
-- First bound: if `f z` is close to `y`, then `g z` is close to `z` (i.e., almost a fixed point).
have A : ∀ z, dist (g z) z ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y,
{ assume z,
rw [dist_eq_norm, hg, add_sub_cancel', dist_eq_norm'],
exact f'symm.bound _ },
-- Second bound: if `z` and `g z` are in the set with good control, then `f (g z)` becomes closer
-- to `y` than `f z` was (this uses the linear approximation property, and is the reason for the
-- choice of the formula for `g`).
have B : ∀ z ∈ closed_ball b ε, g z ∈ closed_ball b ε →
dist (f (g z)) y ≤ c * f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y,
{ assume z hz hgz,
set v := f'symm (y - f z) with hv,
calc dist (f (g z)) y = ‖f (z + v) - y‖ : by rw [dist_eq_norm]
... = ‖f (z + v) - f z - f' v + f' v - (y - f z)‖ : by { congr' 1, abel }
... = ‖f (z + v) - f z - f' ((z + v) - z)‖ :
by simp only [continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse.right_inv,
add_sub_cancel', sub_add_cancel]
... ≤ c * ‖(z + v) - z‖ : hf _ (hε hgz) _ (hε hz)
... ≤ c * (f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y) : begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (nnreal.coe_nonneg c),
simpa [hv, dist_eq_norm'] using f'symm.bound (y - f z),
end
... = c * f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y : by ring },
-- Third bound: a complicated bound on `dist w b` (that will show up in the induction) is enough
-- to check that `w` is in the ball on which one has controls. Will be used to check that `u n`
-- belongs to this ball for all `n`.
have C : ∀ (n : ℕ) (w : E),
dist w b ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n) / (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) * dist (f b) y
→ w ∈ closed_ball b ε,
{ assume n w hw,
apply hw.trans,
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_le_iff], swap, { linarith },
calc (f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ) * (1 - (c * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n) * dist (f b) y
= f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y * (1 - (c * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n) : by ring
... ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y * 1 :
begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (mul_nonneg (nnreal.coe_nonneg _) dist_nonneg),
rw [sub_le_self_iff],
exact pow_nonneg (mul_nonneg (nnreal.coe_nonneg _) (nnreal.coe_nonneg _)) _,
end
... ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (((f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ)⁻¹ - c) * ε) :
by { rw [mul_one],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (mem_closed_ball'.1 hy) (nnreal.coe_nonneg _) }
... = ε * (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) : by { field_simp, ring } },
/- Main inductive control: `f (u n)` becomes exponentially close to `y`, and therefore
`dist (u (n+1)) (u n)` becomes exponentally small, making it possible to get an inductive
bound on `dist (u n) b`, from which one checks that `u n` remains in the ball on which we
have estimates. -/
have D : ∀ (n : ℕ), dist (f (u n)) y ≤ (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n * dist (f b) y
∧ dist (u n) b ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n) / (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm)
* dist (f b) y,
{ assume n,
induction n with n IH, { simp [hu, le_refl] },
rw usucc,
have Ign : dist (g (u n)) b ≤
f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n.succ) / (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) * dist (f b) y :=
calc
dist (g (u n)) b ≤ dist (g (u n)) (u n) + dist (u n) b : dist_triangle _ _ _
... ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f (u n)) y + dist (u n) b : add_le_add (A _) le_rfl
... ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * ((c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n * dist (f b) y) +
f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n) / (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) * dist (f b) y :
add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left IH.1 (nnreal.coe_nonneg _)) IH.2
... = f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n.succ) / (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm)
* dist (f b) y : by { field_simp [Jcf'], ring_exp },
refine ⟨_, Ign⟩,
calc dist (f (g (u n))) y ≤ c * f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f (u n)) y :
B _ (C n _ IH.2) (C n.succ _ Ign)
... ≤ (c * f'symm.nnnorm) * ((c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n * dist (f b) y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left IH.1 (mul_nonneg (nnreal.coe_nonneg _) (nnreal.coe_nonneg _))
... = (c * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n.succ * dist (f b) y : by ring_exp },
-- Deduce from the inductive bound that `uₙ` is a Cauchy sequence, therefore converging.
have : cauchy_seq u,
{ have : ∀ (n : ℕ), dist (u n) (u (n+1)) ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y * (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n,
{ assume n,
calc dist (u n) (u (n+1)) = dist (g (u n)) (u n) : by rw [usucc, dist_comm]
... ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f (u n)) y : A _
... ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * ((c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n * dist (f b) y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (D n).1 (nnreal.coe_nonneg _)
... = f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y * (c * f'symm.nnnorm)^n : by ring },
exact cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric _ _ Icf' this },
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x) := cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete this,
-- As all the `uₙ` belong to the ball `closed_ball b ε`, so does their limit `x`.
have xmem : x ∈ closed_ball b ε :=
is_closed_ball.mem_of_tendsto hx (eventually_of_forall (λ n, C n _ (D n).2)),
refine ⟨x, xmem, _⟩,
-- It remains to check that `f x = y`. This follows from continuity of `f` on `closed_ball b ε`
-- and from the fact that `f uₙ` is converging to `y` by construction.
have hx' : tendsto u at_top (𝓝[closed_ball b ε] x),
{ simp only [nhds_within, tendsto_inf, hx, true_and, ge_iff_le, tendsto_principal],
exact eventually_of_forall (λ n, C n _ (D n).2) },
have T1 : tendsto (λ n, f (u n)) at_top (𝓝 (f x)) :=
(hf.continuous_on.mono hε x xmem).tendsto.comp hx',
have T2 : tendsto (λ n, f (u n)) at_top (𝓝 y),
{ rw tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero,
refine squeeze_zero (λ n, dist_nonneg) (λ n, (D n).1) _,
simpa using (tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1
(mul_nonneg (nnreal.coe_nonneg _) (nnreal.coe_nonneg _)) Icf').mul tendsto_const_nhds },
exact tendsto_nhds_unique T1 T2,
end
lemma open_image (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) (f'symm : f'.nonlinear_right_inverse)
(hs : is_open s) (hc : subsingleton F ∨ c < f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹) : is_open (f '' s) :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc, { resetI, apply is_open_discrete },
simp only [is_open_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_basis_closed_ball.mem_iff, ball_image_iff] at hs ⊢,
intros x hx,
rcases hs x hx with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
refine ⟨(f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹ - c) * ε, mul_pos (sub_pos.2 hc) ε0, _⟩,
exact (hf.surj_on_closed_ball_of_nonlinear_right_inverse f'symm (le_of_lt ε0) hε).mono
hε (subset.refl _)
end
lemma image_mem_nhds (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) (f'symm : f'.nonlinear_right_inverse)
{x : E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hc : subsingleton F ∨ c < f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹) :
f '' s ∈ 𝓝 (f x) :=
begin
obtain ⟨t, hts, ht, xt⟩ : ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t := _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 hs,
have := is_open.mem_nhds ((hf.mono_set hts).open_image f'symm ht hc) (mem_image_of_mem _ xt),
exact mem_of_superset this (image_subset _ hts),
end
lemma map_nhds_eq (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) (f'symm : f'.nonlinear_right_inverse)
{x : E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hc : subsingleton F ∨ c < f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹) :
map f (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f x) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm ((hf.continuous_on x (mem_of_mem_nhds hs)).continuous_at hs)
(le_map (λ t ht, _)),
have : f '' (s ∩ t) ∈ 𝓝 (f x) := (hf.mono_set (inter_subset_left s t)).image_mem_nhds
f'symm (inter_mem hs ht) hc,
exact mem_of_superset this (image_subset _ (inter_subset_right _ _)),
end
end locally_onto
/-!
From now on we assume that `f` approximates an invertible continuous linear map `f : E ≃L[𝕜] F`.
We also assume that either `E = {0}`, or `c < ‖f'⁻¹‖⁻¹`. We use `N` as an abbreviation for `‖f'⁻¹‖`.
-/
variables {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {s : set E} {c : ℝ≥0}
local notation `N` := ‖(f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)‖₊
protected lemma antilipschitz (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
antilipschitz_with (N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ (s.restrict f) :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ haveI : subsingleton s := ⟨λ x y, subtype.eq $ @subsingleton.elim _ hE _ _⟩,
exact antilipschitz_with.of_subsingleton },
convert (f'.antilipschitz.restrict s).add_lipschitz_with hf.lipschitz_sub hc,
simp [restrict]
end
protected lemma injective (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
injective (s.restrict f) :=
(hf.antilipschitz hc).injective
protected lemma inj_on (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
inj_on f s :=
inj_on_iff_injective.2 $ hf.injective hc
protected lemma surjective [complete_space E]
(hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) univ c) (hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
surjective f :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ haveI : subsingleton F := (equiv.subsingleton_congr f'.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv).1 hE,
exact surjective_to_subsingleton _ },
{ apply forall_of_forall_mem_closed_ball (λ (y : F), ∃ a, f a = y) (f 0) _,
have hc' : (0 : ℝ) < N⁻¹ - c, by { rw sub_pos, exact hc },
let p : ℝ → Prop := λ R, closed_ball (f 0) R ⊆ set.range f,
have hp : ∀ᶠ (r:ℝ) in at_top, p ((N⁻¹ - c) * r),
{ have hr : ∀ᶠ (r:ℝ) in at_top, 0 ≤ r := eventually_ge_at_top 0,
refine hr.mono (λ r hr, subset.trans _ (image_subset_range f (closed_ball 0 r))),
refine hf.surj_on_closed_ball_of_nonlinear_right_inverse f'.to_nonlinear_right_inverse hr _,
exact subset_univ _ },
refine ((tendsto_id.const_mul_at_top hc').frequently hp.frequently).mono _,
exact λ R h y hy, h hy },
end
/-- A map approximating a linear equivalence on a set defines a local equivalence on this set.
Should not be used outside of this file, because it is superseded by `to_local_homeomorph` below.
This is a first step towards the inverse function. -/
def to_local_equiv (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : local_equiv E F :=
(hf.inj_on hc).to_local_equiv _ _
/-- The inverse function is continuous on `f '' s`. Use properties of `local_homeomorph` instead. -/
lemma inverse_continuous_on (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
continuous_on (hf.to_local_equiv hc).symm (f '' s) :=
begin
apply continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2,
refine ((hf.antilipschitz hc).to_right_inv_on' _ (hf.to_local_equiv hc).right_inv').continuous,
exact (λ x hx, (hf.to_local_equiv hc).map_target hx)
end
/-- The inverse function is approximated linearly on `f '' s` by `f'.symm`. -/
lemma to_inv (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
approximates_linear_on (hf.to_local_equiv hc).symm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) (f '' s)
(N * (N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ * c) :=
begin
assume x hx y hy,
set A := hf.to_local_equiv hc with hA,
have Af : ∀ z, A z = f z := λ z, rfl,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨x', x's, rfl⟩,
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hy with ⟨y', y's, rfl⟩,
rw [← Af x', ← Af y', A.left_inv x's, A.left_inv y's],
calc ‖x' - y' - (f'.symm) (A x' - A y')‖
≤ N * ‖f' (x' - y' - (f'.symm) (A x' - A y'))‖ :
(f' : E →L[𝕜] F).bound_of_antilipschitz f'.antilipschitz _
... = N * ‖A y' - A x' - f' (y' - x')‖ :
begin
congr' 2,
simp only [continuous_linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply, continuous_linear_equiv.map_sub],
abel,
end
... ≤ N * (c * ‖y' - x'‖) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hf _ y's _ x's) (nnreal.coe_nonneg _)
... ≤ N * (c * (((N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) * ‖A y' - A x'‖)) :
begin
apply_rules [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, nnreal.coe_nonneg],
rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm],
exact (hf.antilipschitz hc).le_mul_dist ⟨y', y's⟩ ⟨x', x's⟩,
end
... = (N * (N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ * c : ℝ≥0) * ‖A x' - A y'‖ :
by { simp only [norm_sub_rev, nonneg.coe_mul], ring }
end
include cs
section
variables (f s)
/-- Given a function `f` that approximates a linear equivalence on an open set `s`,
returns a local homeomorph with `to_fun = f` and `source = s`. -/
def to_local_homeomorph (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) : local_homeomorph E F :=
{ to_local_equiv := hf.to_local_equiv hc,
open_source := hs,
open_target := hf.open_image f'.to_nonlinear_right_inverse hs
(by rwa f'.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.subsingleton_congr at hc),
continuous_to_fun := hf.continuous_on,
continuous_inv_fun := hf.inverse_continuous_on hc }
/-- A function `f` that approximates a linear equivalence on the whole space is a homeomorphism. -/
def to_homeomorph (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) univ c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
E ≃ₜ F :=
begin
refine (hf.to_local_homeomorph _ _ hc is_open_univ).to_homeomorph_of_source_eq_univ_target_eq_univ
rfl _,
change f '' univ = univ,
rw [image_univ, range_iff_surjective],
exact hf.surjective hc,
end
omit cs
/-- In a real vector space, a function `f` that approximates a linear equivalence on a subset `s`
can be extended to a homeomorphism of the whole space. -/
lemma exists_homeomorph_extension {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
{F : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] [finite_dimensional ℝ F]
{s : set E} {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[ℝ] F} {c : ℝ≥0}
(hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[ℝ] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ lipschitz_extension_constant F * c < (‖(f'.symm : F →L[ℝ] E)‖₊)⁻¹) :
∃ g : E ≃ₜ F, eq_on f g s :=
begin
-- the difference `f - f'` is Lipschitz on `s`. It can be extended to a Lipschitz function `u`
-- on the whole space, with a slightly worse Lipschitz constant. Then `f' + u` will be the
-- desired homeomorphism.
obtain ⟨u, hu, uf⟩ : ∃ (u : E → F), lipschitz_with (lipschitz_extension_constant F * c) u
∧ eq_on (f - f') u s := hf.lipschitz_on_with.extend_finite_dimension,
let g : E → F := λ x, f' x + u x,
have fg : eq_on f g s := λ x hx, by simp_rw [g, ← uf hx, pi.sub_apply, add_sub_cancel'_right],
have hg : approximates_linear_on g (f' : E →L[ℝ] F) univ (lipschitz_extension_constant F * c),
{ apply lipschitz_on_with.approximates_linear_on,
rw lipschitz_on_univ,
convert hu,
ext x,
simp only [add_sub_cancel', continuous_linear_equiv.coe_coe, pi.sub_apply] },
haveI : finite_dimensional ℝ E := f'.symm.to_linear_equiv.finite_dimensional,
exact ⟨hg.to_homeomorph g hc, fg⟩,
end
end
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_coe (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs : E → F) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_source (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs).source = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_target (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs).target = f '' s := rfl
lemma closed_ball_subset_target (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) {b : E} (ε0 : 0 ≤ ε) (hε : closed_ball b ε ⊆ s) :
closed_ball (f b) ((N⁻¹ - c) * ε) ⊆ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs).target :=
(hf.surj_on_closed_ball_of_nonlinear_right_inverse f'.to_nonlinear_right_inverse
ε0 hε).mono hε (subset.refl _)
end approximates_linear_on
/-!
### Inverse function theorem
Now we prove the inverse function theorem. Let `f : E → F` be a map defined on a complete vector
space `E`. Assume that `f` has an invertible derivative `f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F` at `a : E` in the strict
sense. Then `f` approximates `f'` in the sense of `approximates_linear_on` on an open neighborhood
of `a`, and we can apply `approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph` to construct the inverse
function. -/
namespace has_strict_fderiv_at
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the strict sense and `c > 0`, then `f` approximates `f'`
with constant `c` on some neighborhood of `a`. -/
lemma approximates_deriv_on_nhds {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' a) {c : ℝ≥0} (hc : subsingleton E ∨ 0 < c) :
∃ s ∈ 𝓝 a, approximates_linear_on f f' s c :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ refine ⟨univ, is_open.mem_nhds is_open_univ trivial, λ x hx y hy, _⟩,
simp [@subsingleton.elim E hE x y] },
have := hf.def hc,
rw [nhds_prod_eq, filter.eventually, mem_prod_same_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨s, has, hs⟩,
exact ⟨s, has, λ x hx y hy, hs (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
end
lemma map_nhds_eq_of_surj [complete_space E] [complete_space F]
{f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) (h : linear_map.range f' = ⊤) :
map f (𝓝 a) = 𝓝 (f a) :=
begin
let f'symm := f'.nonlinear_right_inverse_of_surjective h,
set c : ℝ≥0 := f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹ / 2 with hc,
have f'symm_pos : 0 < f'symm.nnnorm := f'.nonlinear_right_inverse_of_surjective_nnnorm_pos h,
have cpos : 0 < c, by simp [hc, nnreal.half_pos, nnreal.inv_pos, f'symm_pos],
obtain ⟨s, s_nhds, hs⟩ : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 a, approximates_linear_on f f' s c :=
hf.approximates_deriv_on_nhds (or.inr cpos),
apply hs.map_nhds_eq f'symm s_nhds (or.inr (nnreal.half_lt_self _)),
simp [ne_of_gt f'symm_pos],
end
variables [cs : complete_space E] {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
lemma approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
∃ (s : set E) (hs : a ∈ s ∧ is_open s),
approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s (‖(f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)‖₊⁻¹ / 2) :=
begin
refine ((nhds_basis_opens a).exists_iff _).1 _,
exact (λ s t, approximates_linear_on.mono_set),
exact (hf.approximates_deriv_on_nhds $ f'.subsingleton_or_nnnorm_symm_pos.imp id $
λ hf', nnreal.half_pos $ nnreal.inv_pos.2 $ hf')
end
include cs
variable (f)
/-- Given a function with an invertible strict derivative at `a`, returns a `local_homeomorph`
with `to_fun = f` and `a ∈ source`. This is a part of the inverse function theorem.
The other part `has_strict_fderiv_at.to_local_inverse` states that the inverse function
of this `local_homeomorph` has derivative `f'.symm`. -/
def to_local_homeomorph (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) : local_homeomorph E F :=
approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph f
(classical.some hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds)
(classical.some_spec hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds).snd
(f'.subsingleton_or_nnnorm_symm_pos.imp id $ λ hf', nnreal.half_lt_self $ ne_of_gt $
nnreal.inv_pos.2 $ hf')
(classical.some_spec hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds).fst.2
variable {f}
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_coe (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f : E → F) = f := rfl
lemma mem_to_local_homeomorph_source (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
a ∈ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f).source :=
(classical.some_spec hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds).fst.1
lemma image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
f a ∈ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f).target :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).map_source hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
lemma map_nhds_eq_of_equiv (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
map f (𝓝 a) = 𝓝 (f a) :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).map_nhds_eq hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
variables (f f' a)
/-- Given a function `f` with an invertible derivative, returns a function that is locally inverse
to `f`. -/
def local_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) : F → E :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).symm
variables {f f' a}
lemma local_inverse_def (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
hf.local_inverse f _ _ = (hf.to_local_homeomorph f).symm :=
rfl
lemma eventually_left_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, hf.local_inverse f f' a (f x) = x :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).eventually_left_inverse hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
@[simp] lemma local_inverse_apply_image (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
hf.local_inverse f f' a (f a) = a :=
hf.eventually_left_inverse.self_of_nhds
lemma eventually_right_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (f a), f (hf.local_inverse f f' a y) = y :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).eventually_right_inverse' hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
lemma local_inverse_continuous_at (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
continuous_at (hf.local_inverse f f' a) (f a) :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).continuous_at_symm hf.image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target
lemma local_inverse_tendsto (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
tendsto (hf.local_inverse f f' a) (𝓝 $ f a) (𝓝 a) :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).tendsto_symm hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
lemma local_inverse_unique (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) {g : F → E}
(hg : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, g (f x) = x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (f a), g y = local_inverse f f' a hf y :=
eventually_eq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv hg hf.eventually_right_inverse $
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).tendsto_symm hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
/-- If `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of strict differentiability `(hf)`,
then the inverse function `hf.local_inverse f` has derivative `f'.symm` at `f a`. -/
theorem to_local_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (hf.local_inverse f f' a) (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) (f a) :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).has_strict_fderiv_at_symm hf.image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target $
by simpa [← local_inverse_def] using hf
/-- If `f : E → F` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of strict differentiability
and `g (f x) = x` in a neighborhood of `a`, then `g` has derivative `f'.symm` at `f a`.
For a version assuming `f (g y) = y` and continuity of `g` at `f a` but not `[complete_space E]`
see `of_local_left_inverse`. -/
theorem to_local_left_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) {g : F → E}
(hg : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, g (f x) = x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) (f a) :=
hf.to_local_inverse.congr_of_eventually_eq $ (hf.local_inverse_unique hg).mono $ λ _, eq.symm
end has_strict_fderiv_at
/-- If a function has an invertible strict derivative at all points, then it is an open map. -/
lemma open_map_of_strict_fderiv_equiv [complete_space E] {f : E → F} {f' : E → E ≃L[𝕜] F}
(hf : ∀ x, has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' x : E →L[𝕜] F) x) :
is_open_map f :=
is_open_map_iff_nhds_le.2 $ λ x, (hf x).map_nhds_eq_of_equiv.ge
/-!
### Inverse function theorem, 1D case
In this case we prove a version of the inverse function theorem for maps `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜`.
We use `continuous_linear_equiv.units_equiv_aut` to translate `has_strict_deriv_at f f' a` and
`f' ≠ 0` into `has_strict_fderiv_at f (_ : 𝕜 ≃L[𝕜] 𝕜) a`.
-/
namespace has_strict_deriv_at
variables [cs : complete_space 𝕜] {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' a : 𝕜} (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' a)
(hf' : f' ≠ 0)
include cs
variables (f f' a)
/-- A function that is inverse to `f` near `a`. -/
@[reducible] def local_inverse : 𝕜 → 𝕜 :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').local_inverse _ _ _
variables {f f' a}
lemma map_nhds_eq : map f (𝓝 a) = 𝓝 (f a) :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').map_nhds_eq_of_equiv
theorem to_local_inverse : has_strict_deriv_at (hf.local_inverse f f' a hf') f'⁻¹ (f a) :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').to_local_inverse
theorem to_local_left_inverse {g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} (hg : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, g (f x) = x) :
has_strict_deriv_at g f'⁻¹ (f a) :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').to_local_left_inverse hg
end has_strict_deriv_at
/-- If a function has a non-zero strict derivative at all points, then it is an open map. -/
lemma open_map_of_strict_deriv [complete_space 𝕜] {f f' : 𝕜 → 𝕜}
(hf : ∀ x, has_strict_deriv_at f (f' x) x) (h0 : ∀ x, f' x ≠ 0) :
is_open_map f :=
is_open_map_iff_nhds_le.2 $ λ x, ((hf x).map_nhds_eq (h0 x)).ge
/-!
### Inverse function theorem, smooth case
-/
namespace cont_diff_at
variables {𝕂 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕂]
variables {E' : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E'] [normed_space 𝕂 E']
variables {F' : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group F'] [normed_space 𝕂 F']
variables [complete_space E'] (f : E' → F') {f' : E' ≃L[𝕂] F'} {a : E'}
/-- Given a `cont_diff` function over `𝕂` (which is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) with an invertible
derivative at `a`, returns a `local_homeomorph` with `to_fun = f` and `a ∈ source`. -/
def to_local_homeomorph
{n : ℕ∞} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E' →L[𝕂] F') a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
local_homeomorph E' F' :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at' hf' hn).to_local_homeomorph f
variable {f}
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_coe
{n : ℕ∞} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E' →L[𝕂] F') a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f hf' hn : E' → F') = f := rfl
lemma mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
{n : ℕ∞} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E' →L[𝕂] F') a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
a ∈ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f hf' hn).source :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at' hf' hn).mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
lemma image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target
{n : ℕ∞} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E' →L[𝕂] F') a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
f a ∈ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f hf' hn).target :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at' hf' hn).image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target
/-- Given a `cont_diff` function over `𝕂` (which is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) with an invertible derivative
at `a`, returns a function that is locally inverse to `f`. -/
def local_inverse
{n : ℕ∞} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E' →L[𝕂] F') a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
F' → E' :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at' hf' hn).local_inverse f f' a
lemma local_inverse_apply_image
{n : ℕ∞} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E' →L[𝕂] F') a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
hf.local_inverse hf' hn (f a) = a :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at' hf' hn).local_inverse_apply_image
/-- Given a `cont_diff` function over `𝕂` (which is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) with an invertible derivative
at `a`, the inverse function (produced by `cont_diff.to_local_homeomorph`) is
also `cont_diff`. -/
lemma to_local_inverse
{n : ℕ∞} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f a) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E' →L[𝕂] F') a)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
cont_diff_at 𝕂 n (hf.local_inverse hf' hn) (f a) :=
begin
have := hf.local_inverse_apply_image hf' hn,
apply (hf.to_local_homeomorph f hf' hn).cont_diff_at_symm
(image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target hf hf' hn),
{ convert hf' },
{ convert hf }
end
end cont_diff_at
|
f9b7b77a71e55a846744b86bb9b2d52c5f8f0536 | 8b9f17008684d796c8022dab552e42f0cb6fb347 | /library/data/squash.lean | 2ef9b48cb59e27cefb70b005264529e2454a5f07 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | chubbymaggie/lean | 0d06ae25f9dd396306fb02190e89422ea94afd7b | d2c7b5c31928c98f545b16420d37842c43b4ae9a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,313,622,901 | 1,430,266,839,000 | 1,430,267,083,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,840 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: data.squash
Author: Leonardo de Moura
Define squash type (aka propositional truncation) using quotients.
This definition is slightly better than defining the squash type ∥A∥ as (nonempty A).
If we define it using (nonempty A), then we can only lift functions A → B to ∥A∥ → B
when B is a proposition. With quotients, we can lift to any B type that is a subsingleton
(i.e., has at most one element).
-/
open quot
private definition eqv {A : Type} (a b : A) : Prop := true
local infix ~ := eqv
private lemma eqv_refl {A : Type} : ∀ a : A, a ~ a :=
λ a, trivial
private lemma eqv_symm {A : Type} : ∀ a b : A, a ~ b → b ~ a :=
λ a b h, trivial
private lemma eqv_trans {A : Type} : ∀ a b c : A, a ~ b → b ~ c → a ~ c :=
λ a b c h₁ h₂, trivial
definition squash_setoid (A : Type) : setoid A :=
setoid.mk (@eqv A) (mk_equivalence (@eqv A) (@eqv_refl A) (@eqv_symm A) (@eqv_trans A))
definition squash (A : Type) : Type :=
quot (squash_setoid A)
namespace squash
local attribute squash_setoid [instance]
notation `∥`:0 A `∥` := squash A
definition mk {A : Type} (a : A) : ∥A∥ :=
⟦a⟧
protected definition irrelevant {A : Type} : ∀ a b : ∥A∥, a = b :=
λ a b, quot.induction_on₂ a b (λ a b, quot.sound trivial)
definition lift {A B : Type} [h : subsingleton B] (f : A → B) : ∥A∥ → B :=
λ s, quot.lift_on s f (λ a₁ a₂ r, subsingleton.elim (f a₁) (f a₂))
end squash
open squash decidable
definition decidable_eq_squash [instance] (A : Type) : decidable_eq ∥A∥ :=
λ a b, inl (squash.irrelevant a b)
definition subsingleton_squash [instance] (A : Type) : subsingleton ∥A∥ :=
subsingleton.intro (@squash.irrelevant A)
|
2cd0578a6255aa1d77a0e1ba4e9d1445594cf76c | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/tactic/group.lean | 99a8ebb16824b7a2b6545c3bec2c120b784e1595 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,802 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import tactic.ring
import tactic.doc_commands
/-!
# `group`
Normalizes expressions in the language of groups. The basic idea is to use the simplifier
to put everything into a product of group powers (`zpow` which takes a group element and an
integer), then simplify the exponents using the `ring` tactic. The process needs to be repeated
since `ring` can normalize an exponent to zero, leading to a factor that can be removed
before collecting exponents again. The simplifier step also uses some extra lemmas to avoid
some `ring` invocations.
## Tags
group_theory
-/
-- The next four lemmas are not general purpose lemmas, they are intended for use only by
-- the `group` tactic.
@[to_additive]
lemma tactic.group.zpow_trick {G : Type*} [group G] (a b : G) (n m : ℤ) : a*b^n*b^m = a*b^(n+m) :=
by rw [mul_assoc, ← zpow_add]
@[to_additive]
lemma tactic.group.zpow_trick_one {G : Type*} [group G] (a b : G) (m : ℤ) : a*b*b^m = a*b^(m+1) :=
by rw [mul_assoc, mul_self_zpow]
@[to_additive]
lemma tactic.group.zpow_trick_one' {G : Type*} [group G] (a b : G) (n : ℤ) : a*b^n*b = a*b^(n+1) :=
by rw [mul_assoc, mul_zpow_self]
@[to_additive]
lemma tactic.group.zpow_trick_sub {G : Type*} [group G] (a b : G) (n m : ℤ) :
a*b^n*b^(-m) = a*b^(n-m) :=
by rw [mul_assoc, ← zpow_add] ; refl
namespace tactic
setup_tactic_parser
open tactic.simp_arg_type interactive tactic.group
/-- Auxiliary tactic for the `group` tactic. Calls the simplifier only. -/
meta def aux_group₁ (locat : loc) : tactic unit :=
simp_core { fail_if_unchanged := ff } skip tt [
expr ``(commutator_element_def),
expr ``(mul_one),
expr ``(one_mul),
expr ``(one_pow),
expr ``(one_zpow),
expr ``(sub_self),
expr ``(add_neg_self),
expr ``(neg_add_self),
expr ``(neg_neg),
expr ``(tsub_self),
expr ``(int.coe_nat_add),
expr ``(int.coe_nat_mul),
expr ``(int.coe_nat_zero),
expr ``(int.coe_nat_one),
expr ``(int.coe_nat_bit0),
expr ``(int.coe_nat_bit1),
expr ``(int.mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm),
expr ``(int.neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm),
symm_expr ``(zpow_coe_nat),
symm_expr ``(zpow_neg_one),
symm_expr ``(zpow_mul),
symm_expr ``(zpow_add_one),
symm_expr ``(zpow_one_add),
symm_expr ``(zpow_add),
expr ``(mul_zpow_neg_one),
expr ``(zpow_zero),
expr ``(mul_zpow),
symm_expr ``(mul_assoc),
expr ``(zpow_trick),
expr ``(zpow_trick_one),
expr ``(zpow_trick_one'),
expr ``(zpow_trick_sub),
expr ``(tactic.ring.horner)]
[] locat >> skip
/-- Auxiliary tactic for the `group` tactic. Calls `ring_nf` to normalize exponents. -/
meta def aux_group₂ (locat : loc) : tactic unit :=
ring_nf none tactic.ring.normalize_mode.raw locat
end tactic
namespace tactic.interactive
setup_tactic_parser
open tactic
/--
Tactic for normalizing expressions in multiplicative groups, without assuming
commutativity, using only the group axioms without any information about which group
is manipulated.
(For additive commutative groups, use the `abel` tactic instead.)
Example:
```lean
example {G : Type} [group G] (a b c d : G) (h : c = (a*b^2)*((b*b)⁻¹*a⁻¹)*d) : a*c*d⁻¹ = a :=
begin
group at h, -- normalizes `h` which becomes `h : c = d`
rw h, -- the goal is now `a*d*d⁻¹ = a`
group, -- which then normalized and closed
end
```
-/
meta def group (locat : parse location) : tactic unit :=
do when locat.include_goal `[rw ← mul_inv_eq_one],
aux_group₁ locat,
repeat (aux_group₂ locat ; aux_group₁ locat)
end tactic.interactive
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "group",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.group],
tags := ["decision procedure", "simplification"] }
|
8252da29ad4220adeacf59aeefd6a55a09ae9ea2 | 9b9a16fa2cb737daee6b2785474678b6fa91d6d4 | /src/number_theory/pell.lean | 1e7c298fd41a3a037a79112b6f9192c0cf03f433 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | johoelzl/mathlib | 253f46daa30b644d011e8e119025b01ad69735c4 | 592e3c7a2dfbd5826919b4605559d35d4d75938f | refs/heads/master | 1,625,657,216,488 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 98,915,829 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,522,917,267,000 | 1,501,524,499,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,282 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.int.basic data.nat.prime data.nat.modeq
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case,
but of course both parts are real here since `d` is nonnegative. -/
structure zsqrtd (d : ℕ) := mk {} ::
(re : ℤ)
(im : ℤ)
prefix `ℤ√`:100 := zsqrtd
namespace zsqrtd
section
parameters {d : ℕ}
instance : decidable_eq ℤ√d :=
by tactic.mk_dec_eq_instance
theorem ext : ∀ {z w : ℤ√d}, z = w ↔ z.re = w.re ∧ z.im = w.im
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩ := ⟨λ h, by injection h; split; assumption,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, by congr; assumption⟩
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def of_int (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d := ⟨n, 0⟩
@[simp] theorem of_int_re (n : ℤ) : (of_int n).re = n := rfl
@[simp] theorem of_int_im (n : ℤ) : (of_int n).im = 0 := rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
def zero : ℤ√d := of_int 0
instance : has_zero ℤ√d := ⟨zsqrtd.zero⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 := rfl
/-- The one of the ring -/
def one : ℤ√d := of_int 1
instance : has_one ℤ√d := ⟨zsqrtd.one⟩
@[simp] theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 := rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d := ⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp] theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 := rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
def add : ℤ√d → ℤ√d → ℤ√d
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩ := ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩
instance : has_add ℤ√d := ⟨zsqrtd.add⟩
@[simp] theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) :
(⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_re : ∀ z w : ℤ√d, (z + w).re = z.re + w.re
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_im : ∀ z w : ℤ√d, (z + w).im = z.im + w.im
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem bit0_re (z) : (bit0 z : ℤ√d).re = bit0 z.re := add_re _ _
@[simp] theorem bit0_im (z) : (bit0 z : ℤ√d).im = bit0 z.im := add_im _ _
@[simp] theorem bit1_re (z) : (bit1 z : ℤ√d).re = bit1 z.re := by simp [bit1]
@[simp] theorem bit1_im (z) : (bit1 z : ℤ√d).im = bit0 z.im := by simp [bit1]
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
def neg : ℤ√d → ℤ√d
| ⟨x, y⟩ := ⟨-x, -y⟩
instance : has_neg ℤ√d := ⟨zsqrtd.neg⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_re : ∀ z : ℤ√d, (-z).re = -z.re
| ⟨x, y⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_im : ∀ z : ℤ√d, (-z).im = -z.im
| ⟨x, y⟩ := rfl
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
def conj : ℤ√d → ℤ√d
| ⟨x, y⟩ := ⟨x, -y⟩
@[simp] theorem conj_re : ∀ z : ℤ√d, (conj z).re = z.re
| ⟨x, y⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem conj_im : ∀ z : ℤ√d, (conj z).im = -z.im
| ⟨x, y⟩ := rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
def mul : ℤ√d → ℤ√d → ℤ√d
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩ := ⟨x * x' + d * y * y', x * y' + y * x'⟩
instance : has_mul ℤ√d := ⟨zsqrtd.mul⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : ℤ√d, (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : ℤ√d, (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩ := rfl
instance : comm_ring ℤ√d := by refine
{ add := (+),
zero := 0,
neg := has_neg.neg,
mul := (*),
one := 1, ..};
{ intros, simp [ext, add_mul, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] }
instance : add_comm_monoid ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : add_monoid ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : monoid ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : comm_monoid ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semigroup ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : semigroup ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_semigroup ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : add_semigroup ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semiring ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : semiring ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : ring ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : distrib ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : zero_ne_one_class ℤ√d :=
{ zero := 0, one := 1, zero_ne_one := dec_trivial }
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
by induction n; simp *
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
by induction n; simp *
theorem coe_nat_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
by simp [ext]
@[simp] theorem coe_int_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
by cases n; simp [*, int.of_nat_eq_coe, int.neg_succ_of_nat_eq]
@[simp] theorem coe_int_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
by cases n; simp *
theorem coe_int_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
by simp [ext]
@[simp] theorem of_int_eq_coe (n : ℤ) : (of_int n : ℤ√d) = n :=
by simp [ext]
@[simp] theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ :=
by simp [ext]
@[simp] theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ :=
by simp [ext]
@[simp] theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ :=
by simp [ext]
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd * y :=
by simp [ext]
theorem mul_conj {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * conj ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y :=
by simp [ext, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul : Π {a b : ℤ√d}, conj (a * b) = conj a * conj b :=
by simp [ext]
protected lemma coe_int_add (m n : ℤ) : (↑(m + n) : ℤ√d) = ↑m + ↑n := by simp [ext]
protected lemma coe_int_sub (m n : ℤ) : (↑(m - n) : ℤ√d) = ↑m - ↑n := by simp [ext]
protected lemma coe_int_mul (m n : ℤ) : (↑(m * n) : ℤ√d) = ↑m * ↑n := by simp [ext]
protected lemma coe_int_inj {m n : ℤ} (h : (↑m : ℤ√d) = ↑n) : m = n :=
by simpa using congr_arg re h
/-- Read `sq_le a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def sq_le (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop := c*a*a ≤ d*b*b
theorem sq_le_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : sq_le x c y d) : sq_le z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)) $
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _))
theorem sq_le_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : sq_le x c y d) (zw : sq_le z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.2 $
by simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using
mul_le_mul xy zw (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)
theorem sq_le_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : sq_le x c y d) (zw : sq_le z c w d) :
sq_le (x + z) c (y + w) d :=
begin
have xz := sq_le_add_mixed xy zw,
simp [sq_le, mul_assoc] at xy zw,
simp [sq_le, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
end
theorem sq_le_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : sq_le y d x c) (h : sq_le (x + z) c (y + w) d) : sq_le z c w d :=
begin
apply le_of_not_gt,
intro l,
refine not_le_of_gt _ h,
simp [sq_le, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm],
have hm := sq_le_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l),
simp [sq_le, mul_assoc] at l zw,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
end
theorem sq_le_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : sq_le x c y d) : sq_le (n * x) c (n * y) d :=
by simpa [sq_le, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using
nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sq_le_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(sq_le x 1 y d → sq_le z 1 w d → sq_le (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(sq_le x 1 y d → sq_le w d z 1 → sq_le (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(sq_le y d x 1 → sq_le z 1 w d → sq_le (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(sq_le y d x 1 → sq_le w d z 1 → sq_le (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) :=
by refine ⟨_, _, _, _⟩; {
intros xy zw,
have := int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le zw)),
refine int.le_of_coe_nat_le_coe_nat (le_of_sub_nonneg _),
simpa [mul_add, mul_left_comm, mul_comm] }
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ) (b : ℕ) := true
| (a : ℕ) -[1+ b] := sq_le (b+1) c a d
| -[1+ a] (b : ℕ) := sq_le (a+1) d b c
| -[1+ a] -[1+ b] := false
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : nonnegg c d x y = nonnegg d c y x :=
by induction x; induction y; refl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : Π {a b : ℕ}, nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ sq_le a d b c
| 0 b := ⟨by simp [sq_le, nat.zero_le], λa, trivial⟩
| (a+1) b := by rw ← int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe; refl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ sq_le b c a d :=
by rw nonnegg_comm; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} : Π {b : ℤ}, (Π x : ℕ, b = -x → sq_le x c a d) → nonnegg c d a b
| (b:nat) h := trivial
| -[1+ b] h := h (b+1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : Π x : ℕ, a = -x → sq_le x d b c) : nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
/-- Nonnegativity of an element of `ℤ√d`. -/
def nonneg : ℤ√d → Prop | ⟨a, b⟩ := nonnegg d 1 a b
protected def le (a b : ℤ√d) : Prop := nonneg (b - a)
instance : has_le ℤ√d := ⟨zsqrtd.le⟩
protected def lt (a b : ℤ√d) : Prop := ¬(b ≤ a)
instance : has_lt ℤ√d := ⟨zsqrtd.lt⟩
instance decidable_nonnegg (c d a b) : decidable (nonnegg c d a b) :=
by cases a; cases b; repeat {rw int.of_nat_eq_coe}; unfold nonnegg sq_le; apply_instance
instance decidable_nonneg : Π (a : ℤ√d), decidable (nonneg a)
| ⟨a, b⟩ := zsqrtd.decidable_nonnegg _ _ _ _
instance decidable_le (a b : ℤ√d) : decidable (a ≤ b) := decidable_nonneg _
theorem nonneg_cases : Π {a : ℤ√d}, nonneg a → ∃ x y : ℕ, a = ⟨x, y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨x, -y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨-x, y⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩ h := ⟨x, y, or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), -[1+ y]⟩ h := ⟨x, y+1, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨-[1+ x], (y : ℕ)⟩ h := ⟨x+1, y, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩
| ⟨-[1+ x], -[1+ y]⟩ h := false.elim h
lemma nonneg_add_lem {x y z w : ℕ} (xy : nonneg ⟨x, -y⟩) (zw : nonneg ⟨-z, w⟩) : nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ + ⟨-z, w⟩) :=
have nonneg ⟨int.sub_nat_nat x z, int.sub_nat_nat w y⟩, from int.sub_nat_nat_elim x z
(λm n i, sq_le y d m 1 → sq_le n 1 w d → nonneg ⟨i, int.sub_nat_nat w y⟩)
(λj k, int.sub_nat_nat_elim w y
(λm n i, sq_le n d (k + j) 1 → sq_le k 1 m d → nonneg ⟨int.of_nat j, i⟩)
(λm n xy zw, trivial)
(λm n xy zw, sq_le_cancel zw xy))
(λj k, int.sub_nat_nat_elim w y
(λm n i, sq_le n d k 1 → sq_le (k + j + 1) 1 m d → nonneg ⟨-[1+ j], i⟩)
(λm n xy zw, sq_le_cancel xy zw)
(λm n xy zw, let t := nat.le_trans zw (sq_le_of_le (nat.le_add_right n (m+1)) (le_refl _) xy) in
have k + j + 1 ≤ k, from nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.2 (by repeat{rw one_mul at t}; exact t),
absurd this (not_le_of_gt $ nat.succ_le_succ $ nat.le_add_right _ _))) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 xy) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 zw),
show nonneg ⟨_, _⟩, by rw [neg_add_eq_sub]; rwa [int.sub_nat_nat_eq_coe,int.sub_nat_nat_eq_coe] at this
theorem nonneg_add {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : nonneg a) (hb : nonneg b) : nonneg (a + b) :=
begin
rcases nonneg_cases ha with ⟨x, y, rfl|rfl|rfl⟩;
rcases nonneg_cases hb with ⟨z, w, rfl|rfl|rfl⟩; dsimp [add, nonneg] at ha hb ⊢,
{ trivial },
{ refine nonnegg_cases_right (λi h, sq_le_of_le _ _ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)),
{ exact int.coe_nat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (@int.le.intro _ _ y (by simp *))) },
{ apply nat.le_add_left } },
{ refine nonnegg_cases_left (λi h, sq_le_of_le _ _ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)),
{ exact int.coe_nat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (@int.le.intro _ _ x (by simp *))) },
{ apply nat.le_add_left } },
{ refine nonnegg_cases_right (λi h, sq_le_of_le _ _ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)),
{ exact int.coe_nat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (@int.le.intro _ _ w (by simp *))) },
{ apply nat.le_add_right } },
{ simpa using nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sq_le_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)) },
{ exact nonneg_add_lem ha hb },
{ refine nonnegg_cases_left (λi h, sq_le_of_le _ _ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)),
{ exact int.coe_nat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (@int.le.intro _ _ z (by simp *))) },
{ apply nat.le_add_right } },
{ rw [add_comm, add_comm ↑y], exact nonneg_add_lem hb ha },
{ simpa using nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sq_le_add (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)) },
end
theorem le_refl (a : ℤ√d) : a ≤ a := show nonneg (a - a), by simp
protected theorem le_trans {a b c : ℤ√d} (ab : a ≤ b) (bc : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c :=
have nonneg (b - a + (c - b)), from nonneg_add ab bc,
by simpa
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a : ℤ√d} : nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a := show _ ↔ nonneg _, by simp
theorem le_of_le_le {x y z w : ℤ} (xz : x ≤ z) (yw : y ≤ w) : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨z, w⟩ :=
show nonneg ⟨z - x, w - y⟩, from
match z - x, w - y, int.le.dest_sub xz, int.le.dest_sub yw with ._, ._, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ⟨b, rfl⟩ := trivial end
theorem le_arch (a : ℤ√d) : ∃n : ℕ, a ≤ n :=
let ⟨x, y, (h : a ≤ ⟨x, y⟩)⟩ := show ∃x y : ℕ, nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ + -a), from match -a with
| ⟨int.of_nat x, int.of_nat y⟩ := ⟨0, 0, trivial⟩
| ⟨int.of_nat x, -[1+ y]⟩ := ⟨0, y+1, by simp [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe]⟩
| ⟨-[1+ x], int.of_nat y⟩ := ⟨x+1, 0, by simp [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe]⟩
| ⟨-[1+ x], -[1+ y]⟩ := ⟨x+1, y+1, by simp [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe]⟩
end in begin
refine ⟨x + d*y, zsqrtd.le_trans h _⟩,
rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, ← of_int_eq_coe],
change nonneg ⟨(↑x + d*y) - ↑x, 0-↑y⟩,
cases y with y,
{ simp },
have h : ∀y, sq_le y d (d * y) 1 := λ y,
by simpa [sq_le, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using
nat.mul_le_mul_right (y * y) (nat.le_mul_self d),
rw [show (x:ℤ) + d * nat.succ y - x = d * nat.succ y, by simp],
exact h (y+1)
end
protected theorem nonneg_total : Π (a : ℤ√d), nonneg a ∨ nonneg (-a)
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩ := or.inl trivial
| ⟨-[1+ x], -[1+ y]⟩ := or.inr trivial
| ⟨0, -[1+ y]⟩ := or.inr trivial
| ⟨-[1+ x], 0⟩ := or.inr trivial
| ⟨(x+1:ℕ), -[1+ y]⟩ := nat.le_total
| ⟨-[1+ x], (y+1:ℕ)⟩ := nat.le_total
protected theorem le_total (a b : ℤ√d) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a :=
let t := nonneg_total (b - a) in by rw [show -(b-a) = a-b, from neg_sub b a] at t; exact t
instance : preorder ℤ√d :=
{ le := zsqrtd.le,
le_refl := zsqrtd.le_refl,
le_trans := @zsqrtd.le_trans,
lt := zsqrtd.lt,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ a b,
(and_iff_right_of_imp (zsqrtd.le_total _ _).resolve_left).symm }
protected theorem add_le_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (ab : a ≤ b) (c : ℤ√d) : c + a ≤ c + b :=
show nonneg _, by rw add_sub_add_left_eq_sub; exact ab
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left (a b c : ℤ√d) (h : c + a ≤ c + b) : a ≤ b :=
by simpa using zsqrtd.add_le_add_left _ _ h (-c)
protected theorem add_lt_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (h : a < b) (c) : c + a < c + b :=
λ h', h (zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left _ _ _ h')
theorem nonneg_smul {a : ℤ√d} {n : ℕ} (ha : nonneg a) : nonneg (n * a) :=
by rw ← int.cast_coe_nat; exact match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| ._, ⟨x, y, or.inl rfl⟩, ha := by rw smul_val; trivial
| ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ha := by rw smul_val; simpa using
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sq_le_smul n $ nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ha := by rw smul_val; simpa using
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sq_le_smul n $ nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
end
theorem nonneg_muld {a : ℤ√d} (ha : nonneg a) : nonneg (sqrtd * a) :=
by refine match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| ._, ⟨x, y, or.inl rfl⟩, ha := trivial
| ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ha := by simp; apply nonnegg_neg_pos.2;
simpa [sq_le, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using
nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ha := by simp; apply nonnegg_pos_neg.2;
simpa [sq_le, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using
nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
end
theorem nonneg_mul_lem {x y : ℕ} {a : ℤ√d} (ha : nonneg a) : nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ * a) :=
have (⟨x, y⟩ * a : ℤ√d) = x * a + sqrtd * (y * a), by rw [decompose, right_distrib, mul_assoc]; refl,
by rw this; exact nonneg_add (nonneg_smul ha) (nonneg_muld $ nonneg_smul ha)
theorem nonneg_mul {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : nonneg a) (hb : nonneg b) : nonneg (a * b) :=
match a, b, nonneg_cases ha, nonneg_cases hb, ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb := trivial
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb := nonneg_mul_lem hb
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb := nonneg_mul_lem hb
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb := by rw mul_comm; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb := by rw mul_comm; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb :=
by rw [calc (⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ : rfl
... = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ : by simp]; exact
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sq_le_mul.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb :=
by rw [calc (⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ : rfl
... = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ : by simp]; exact
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sq_le_mul.right.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inr $ or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb :=
by rw [calc (⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ : rfl
... = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ : by simp]; exact
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sq_le_mul.right.right.left (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| ._, ._, ⟨x, y, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, or.inr $ or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb :=
by rw [calc (⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ : rfl
... = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ : by simp]; exact
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sq_le_mul.right.right.right (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
end
protected theorem mul_nonneg (a b : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b :=
by repeat {rw ← nonneg_iff_zero_le}; exact nonneg_mul
theorem not_sq_le_succ (c d y) (h : c > 0) : ¬sq_le (y + 1) c 0 d :=
not_le_of_gt $ mul_pos (mul_pos h $ nat.succ_pos _) $ nat.succ_pos _
/-- A nonsquare is a natural number that is not equal to the square of an
integer. This is implemented as a typeclass because it's a necessary condition
for much of the Pell equation theory. -/
class nonsquare (x : ℕ) : Prop := (ns : ∀n : ℕ, x ≠ n*n)
parameter [dnsq : nonsquare d]
include dnsq
theorem d_pos : 0 < d := lt_of_le_of_ne (nat.zero_le _) $ ne.symm $ (nonsquare.ns d 0)
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero {x y} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
let g := x.gcd y in or.elim g.eq_zero_or_pos
(λH, ⟨nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H, nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H⟩)
(λgpos, false.elim $
let ⟨m, n, co, (hx : x = m * g), (hy : y = n * g)⟩ := nat.exists_coprime gpos in
begin
rw [hx, hy] at h,
have : m * m = d * (n * n) := nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (mul_pos gpos gpos)
(by simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using h),
have co2 := let co1 := co.mul_right co in co1.mul co1,
exact nonsquare.ns d m (nat.dvd_antisymm (by rw this; apply dvd_mul_right) $
co2.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right $ by simp [this])
end)
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero_z {x y : ℤ} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
by rw [mul_assoc, ← int.nat_abs_mul_self, ← int.nat_abs_mul_self, ← int.coe_nat_mul, ← mul_assoc] at h;
exact let ⟨h1, h2⟩ := divides_sq_eq_zero (int.coe_nat_inj h) in
⟨int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero h1, int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero h2⟩
theorem not_divides_square (x y) : (x + 1) * (x + 1) ≠ d * (y + 1) * (y + 1) :=
λe, by have t := (divides_sq_eq_zero e).left; contradiction
theorem nonneg_antisymm : Π {a : ℤ√d}, nonneg a → nonneg (-a) → a = 0
| ⟨0, 0⟩ xy yx := rfl
| ⟨-[1+ x], -[1+ y]⟩ xy yx := false.elim xy
| ⟨(x+1:nat), (y+1:nat)⟩ xy yx := false.elim yx
| ⟨-[1+ x], 0⟩ xy yx := absurd xy (not_sq_le_succ _ _ _ dec_trivial)
| ⟨(x+1:nat), 0⟩ xy yx := absurd yx (not_sq_le_succ _ _ _ dec_trivial)
| ⟨0, -[1+ y]⟩ xy yx := absurd xy (not_sq_le_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨0, (y+1:nat)⟩ _ yx := absurd yx (not_sq_le_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨(x+1:nat), -[1+ y]⟩ (xy : sq_le _ _ _ _) (yx : sq_le _ _ _ _) :=
let t := le_antisymm yx xy in by rw[one_mul] at t; exact absurd t (not_divides_square _ _)
| ⟨-[1+ x], (y+1:nat)⟩ (xy : sq_le _ _ _ _) (yx : sq_le _ _ _ _) :=
let t := le_antisymm xy yx in by rw[one_mul] at t; exact absurd t (not_divides_square _ _)
theorem le_antisymm {a b : ℤ√d} (ab : a ≤ b) (ba : b ≤ a) : a = b :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ nonneg_antisymm ba (by rw neg_sub; exact ab)
instance : decidable_linear_order ℤ√d :=
{ le_antisymm := @zsqrtd.le_antisymm,
le_total := zsqrtd.le_total,
decidable_le := zsqrtd.decidable_le,
..zsqrtd.preorder }
protected theorem eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : Π {a b : ℤ√d}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0
| ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨z, w⟩ h := by injection h with h1 h2; exact
have h1 : x*z = -(d*y*w), from eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero h1,
have h2 : x*w = -(y*z), from eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero h2,
have fin : x*x = d*y*y → (⟨x, y⟩:ℤ√d) = 0, from
λe, match x, y, divides_sq_eq_zero_z e with ._, ._, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := rfl end,
if z0 : z = 0 then if w0 : w = 0 then
or.inr (match z, w, z0, w0 with ._, ._, rfl, rfl := rfl end)
else
or.inl $ fin $ eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right w0 $ calc
x * x * w = -y * (x * z) : by simp [h2, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
... = d * y * y * w : by simp [h1, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
else
or.inl $ fin $ eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right z0 $ calc
x * x * z = d * -y * (x * w) : by simp [h1, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
... = d * y * y * z : by simp [h2, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
instance : integral_domain ℤ√d :=
{ zero_ne_one := zero_ne_one,
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := @zsqrtd.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero,
..zsqrtd.comm_ring }
protected theorem mul_pos (a b : ℤ√d) (a0 : 0 < a) (b0 : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := λab,
or.elim (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (le_antisymm ab (mul_nonneg _ _ (le_of_lt a0) (le_of_lt b0))))
(λe, ne_of_gt a0 e)
(λe, ne_of_gt b0 e)
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring ℤ√d :=
{ add_le_add_left := @zsqrtd.add_le_add_left,
add_lt_add_left := @zsqrtd.add_lt_add_left,
zero_ne_one := zero_ne_one,
mul_nonneg := @zsqrtd.mul_nonneg,
mul_pos := @zsqrtd.mul_pos,
zero_lt_one := dec_trivial,
..zsqrtd.comm_ring, ..zsqrtd.decidable_linear_order }
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_semiring ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_semiring ℤ√d := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_semiring ℤ√d := by apply_instance
end
end zsqrtd
namespace pell
open nat
section
parameters {a : ℕ} (a1 : a > 1)
include a1
private def d := a*a - 1
@[simp] theorem d_pos : 0 < d := nat.sub_pos_of_lt (mul_lt_mul a1 (le_of_lt a1) dec_trivial dec_trivial : 1*1<a*a)
/-- The Pell sequences, defined together in mutual recursion. -/
def pell : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ :=
λn, nat.rec_on n (1, 0) (λn xy, (xy.1*a + d*xy.2, xy.1 + xy.2*a))
/-- The Pell `x` sequence. -/
def xn (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (pell n).1
/-- The Pell `y` sequence. -/
def yn (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (pell n).2
@[simp] theorem pell_val (n : ℕ) : pell n = (xn n, yn n) :=
show pell n = ((pell n).1, (pell n).2), from match pell n with (a, b) := rfl end
@[simp] theorem xn_zero : xn 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem yn_zero : yn 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem xn_succ (n : ℕ) : xn (n+1) = xn n * a + d * yn n := rfl
@[simp] theorem yn_succ (n : ℕ) : yn (n+1) = xn n + yn n * a := rfl
@[simp] theorem xn_one : xn 1 = a := by simp
@[simp] theorem yn_one : yn 1 = 1 := by simp
def xz (n : ℕ) : ℤ := xn n
def yz (n : ℕ) : ℤ := yn n
def az : ℤ := a
theorem asq_pos : 0 < a*a :=
le_trans (le_of_lt a1) (by have := @nat.mul_le_mul_left 1 a a (le_of_lt a1); rwa mul_one at this)
theorem dz_val : ↑d = az*az - 1 :=
have 1 ≤ a*a, from asq_pos,
show ↑(a*a - 1) = _, by rw int.coe_nat_sub this; refl
@[simp] theorem xz_succ (n : ℕ) : xz (n+1) = xz n * az + ↑d * yz n := rfl
@[simp] theorem yz_succ (n : ℕ) : yz (n+1) = xz n + yz n * az := rfl
/-- The Pell sequence can also be viewed as an element of `ℤ√d` -/
def pell_zd (n : ℕ) : ℤ√d := ⟨xn n, yn n⟩
@[simp] theorem pell_zd_re (n : ℕ) : (pell_zd n).re = xn n := rfl
@[simp] theorem pell_zd_im (n : ℕ) : (pell_zd n).im = yn n := rfl
/-- The property of being a solution to the Pell equation, expressed
as a property of elements of `ℤ√d`. -/
def is_pell : ℤ√d → Prop | ⟨x, y⟩ := x*x - d*y*y = 1
theorem is_pell_nat {x y : ℕ} : is_pell ⟨x, y⟩ ↔ x*x - d*y*y = 1 :=
⟨λh, int.coe_nat_inj (by rw int.coe_nat_sub (int.le_of_coe_nat_le_coe_nat $ int.le.intro_sub h); exact h),
λh, show ((x*x : ℕ) - (d*y*y:ℕ) : ℤ) = 1, by rw [← int.coe_nat_sub $ le_of_lt $ nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ h, h]; refl⟩
theorem is_pell_norm : Π {b : ℤ√d}, is_pell b ↔ b * b.conj = 1
| ⟨x, y⟩ := by simp [zsqrtd.ext, is_pell, mul_comm]
theorem is_pell_mul {b c : ℤ√d} (hb : is_pell b) (hc : is_pell c) : is_pell (b * c) :=
is_pell_norm.2 (by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm,
zsqrtd.conj_mul, pell.is_pell_norm.1 hb, pell.is_pell_norm.1 hc])
theorem is_pell_conj : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, is_pell b ↔ is_pell b.conj | ⟨x, y⟩ :=
by simp [is_pell, zsqrtd.conj]
@[simp] theorem pell_zd_succ (n : ℕ) : pell_zd (n+1) = pell_zd n * ⟨a, 1⟩ :=
by simp [zsqrtd.ext]
theorem is_pell_one : is_pell ⟨a, 1⟩ :=
show az*az-d*1*1=1, by simp [dz_val]
theorem is_pell_pell_zd : ∀ (n : ℕ), is_pell (pell_zd n)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := let o := is_pell_one in by simp; exact pell.is_pell_mul (is_pell_pell_zd n) o
@[simp] theorem pell_eqz (n : ℕ) : xz n * xz n - d * yz n * yz n = 1 := is_pell_pell_zd n
@[simp] theorem pell_eq (n : ℕ) : xn n * xn n - d * yn n * yn n = 1 :=
let pn := pell_eqz n in
have h : (↑(xn n * xn n) : ℤ) - ↑(d * yn n * yn n) = 1,
by repeat {rw int.coe_nat_mul}; exact pn,
have hl : d * yn n * yn n ≤ xn n * xn n, from
int.le_of_coe_nat_le_coe_nat $ int.le.intro $ add_eq_of_eq_sub' $ eq.symm h,
int.coe_nat_inj (by rw int.coe_nat_sub hl; exact h)
instance dnsq : zsqrtd.nonsquare d := ⟨λn h,
have n*n + 1 = a*a, by rw ← h; exact nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (asq_pos a1),
have na : n < a, from nat.mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.2 (by rw ← this; exact nat.lt_succ_self _),
have (n+1)*(n+1) ≤ n*n + 1, by rw this; exact nat.mul_self_le_mul_self na,
have n+n ≤ 0, from @nat.le_of_add_le_add_right (n*n + 1) _ _ (by simpa [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]),
ne_of_gt d_pos $ by rw nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_trans (nat.le_add_left _ _) this) at h; exact h⟩
theorem xn_ge_a_pow : ∀ (n : ℕ), a^n ≤ xn n
| 0 := le_refl 1
| (n+1) := by simp [nat.pow_succ]; exact le_trans
(nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (xn_ge_a_pow n)) (nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem n_lt_a_pow : ∀ (n : ℕ), n < a^n
| 0 := nat.le_refl 1
| (n+1) := begin have IH := n_lt_a_pow n,
have : a^n + a^n ≤ a^n * a,
{ rw ← mul_two, exact nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1 },
simp [nat.pow_succ], refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ this,
exact add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le IH (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) IH)
end
theorem n_lt_xn (n) : n < xn n :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (n_lt_a_pow n) (xn_ge_a_pow n)
theorem x_pos (n) : xn n > 0 :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le n) (n_lt_xn n)
lemma eq_pell_lem : ∀n (b:ℤ√d), 1 ≤ b → is_pell b → pell_zd n ≥ b → ∃n, b = pell_zd n
| 0 b := λh1 hp hl, ⟨0, @zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ dnsq _ _ hl h1⟩
| (n+1) b := λh1 hp h,
have a1p : (0:ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩, from trivial,
have am1p : (0:ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩, from show (_:nat) ≤ _, by simp; exact nat.pred_le _,
have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√d) = 1, from is_pell_norm.1 is_pell_one,
if ha : b ≥ ⟨↑a, 1⟩ then
let ⟨m, e⟩ := eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩)
(by rw ← a1m; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
(is_pell_mul hp (is_pell_conj.1 is_pell_one))
(by have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p; rwa [pell_zd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t) in
⟨m+1, by rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩, by rw [mul_assoc, eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp, pell_zd_succ, e]⟩
else
suffices ¬1 < b, from ⟨0, show b = 1, from (or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩, λh1l,
by cases b with x y; exact
have bm : (_*⟨_,_⟩ :ℤ√(d a1)) = 1, from pell.is_pell_norm.1 hp,
have y0l : (0:ℤ√(d a1)) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩, from sub_lt_sub h1l $ λ(hn : (1:ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩),
by have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1); rw [bm, mul_one] at t; exact h1l t,
have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩, from
show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩, from
sub_lt_sub (by exact ha) $ λ(hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩),
by have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p;
rw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t; exact ha t,
by simp at y0l; simp at yl2; exact
match y, y0l, (yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩) with
| 0, y0l, yl2 := y0l (le_refl 0)
| (y+1 : ℕ), y0l, yl2 := yl2 (zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (le_refl 0)
(let t := int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le (nat.succ_pos y) in add_le_add t t))
| -[1+y], y0l, yl2 := y0l trivial
end
theorem eq_pell_zd (b : ℤ√d) (b1 : 1 ≤ b) (hp : is_pell b) : ∃n, b = pell_zd n :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := @zsqrtd.le_arch d b in
eq_pell_lem n b b1 hp $ zsqrtd.le_trans h $ by rw zsqrtd.coe_nat_val; exact
zsqrtd.le_of_le_le
(int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $ le_of_lt $ n_lt_xn _ _) (int.coe_zero_le _)
theorem eq_pell {x y : ℕ} (hp : x*x - d*y*y = 1) : ∃n, x = xn n ∧ y = yn n :=
have (1:ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨x, y⟩, from match x, hp with
| 0, (hp : 0 - _ = 1) := by rw nat.zero_sub at hp; contradiction
| (x+1), hp := zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $ nat.succ_pos x) (int.coe_zero_le _)
end,
let ⟨m, e⟩ := eq_pell_zd ⟨x, y⟩ this (is_pell_nat.2 hp) in
⟨m, match x, y, e with ._, ._, rfl := ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ end⟩
theorem pell_zd_add (m) : ∀ n, pell_zd (m + n) = pell_zd m * pell_zd n
| 0 := (mul_one _).symm
| (n+1) := by rw[← add_assoc, pell_zd_succ, pell_zd_succ, pell_zd_add n, ← mul_assoc]
theorem xn_add (m n) : xn (m + n) = xn m * xn n + d * yn m * yn n :=
by injection (pell_zd_add _ m n) with h _;
repeat {rw ← int.coe_nat_add at h <|> rw ← int.coe_nat_mul at h};
exact int.coe_nat_inj h
theorem yn_add (m n) : yn (m + n) = xn m * yn n + yn m * xn n :=
by injection (pell_zd_add _ m n) with _ h;
repeat {rw ← int.coe_nat_add at h <|> rw ← int.coe_nat_mul at h};
exact int.coe_nat_inj h
theorem pell_zd_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : pell_zd (m - n) = pell_zd m * (pell_zd n).conj :=
let t := pell_zd_add n (m - n) in
by rw [nat.add_sub_of_le h] at t;
rw [t, mul_comm (pell_zd _ n) _, mul_assoc, (is_pell_norm _).1 (is_pell_pell_zd _ _), mul_one]
theorem xz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : xz (m - n) = xz m * xz n - d * yz m * yz n :=
by injection (pell_zd_sub _ h) with h _; repeat {rw ← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg at h}; exact h
theorem yz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : yz (m - n) = xz n * yz m - xz m * yz n :=
by injection (pell_zd_sub a1 h) with _ h; repeat {rw ← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg at h}; rw [add_comm, mul_comm] at h; exact h
theorem xy_coprime (n) : (xn n).coprime (yn n) :=
nat.coprime_of_dvd' $ λk kx ky,
let p := pell_eq n in by rw ← p; exact
nat.dvd_sub (le_of_lt $ nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ p)
(dvd_mul_of_dvd_right kx _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right ky _)
theorem y_increasing {m} : Π {n}, m < n → yn m < yn n
| 0 h := absurd h $ nat.not_lt_zero _
| (n+1) h :=
have yn m ≤ yn n, from or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
(λhl, le_of_lt $ y_increasing hl) (λe, by rw e),
by simp; refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ (nat.lt_add_of_pos_left $ x_pos a1 n);
rw ← mul_one (yn a1 m);
exact mul_le_mul this (le_of_lt a1) (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)
theorem x_increasing {m} : Π {n}, m < n → xn m < xn n
| 0 h := absurd h $ nat.not_lt_zero _
| (n+1) h :=
have xn m ≤ xn n, from or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
(λhl, le_of_lt $ x_increasing hl) (λe, by rw e),
by simp; refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_lt this _) (nat.le_add_right _ _);
have t := nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a1 (x_pos a1 n); rwa mul_one at t
theorem yn_ge_n : Π n, n ≤ yn n
| 0 := nat.zero_le _
| (n+1) := show n < yn (n+1), from lt_of_le_of_lt (yn_ge_n n) (y_increasing $ nat.lt_succ_self n)
theorem y_mul_dvd (n) : ∀k, yn n ∣ yn (n * k)
| 0 := dvd_zero _
| (k+1) := by rw [nat.mul_succ, yn_add]; exact
dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (y_mul_dvd k) _)
theorem y_dvd_iff (m n) : yn m ∣ yn n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨λh, nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero $ (nat.eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_right $ λhp,
have co : nat.coprime (yn m) (xn (m * (n / m))), from nat.coprime.symm $
(xy_coprime _).coprime_dvd_right (y_mul_dvd m (n / m)),
have m0 : m > 0, from m.eq_zero_or_pos.resolve_left $
λe, by rw [e, nat.mod_zero] at hp; rw [e] at h; exact
have 0 < yn a1 n, from y_increasing _ hp,
ne_of_lt (y_increasing a1 hp) (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h).symm,
by rw [← nat.mod_add_div n m, yn_add] at h; exact
not_le_of_gt (y_increasing _ $ nat.mod_lt n m0)
(nat.le_of_dvd (y_increasing _ hp) $ co.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right $
(nat.dvd_add_iff_right $ dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (y_mul_dvd _ _ _) _).2 h),
λ⟨k, e⟩, by rw e; apply y_mul_dvd⟩
theorem xy_modeq_yn (n) :
∀k, xn (n * k) ≡ (xn n)^k [MOD (yn n)^2]
∧ yn (n * k) ≡ k * (xn n)^(k-1) * yn n [MOD (yn n)^3]
| 0 := by constructor; simp
| (k+1) :=
let ⟨hx, hy⟩ := xy_modeq_yn k in
have L : xn (n * k) * xn n + d * yn (n * k) * yn n ≡ xn n^k * xn n + 0 [MOD yn n^2], from
modeq.modeq_add (modeq.modeq_mul_right _ hx) $ modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $
by rw nat.pow_succ; exact
mul_dvd_mul_right (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 $
(hy.modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq $ by simp [nat.pow_succ]).trans $ modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $
by simp [-mul_comm, -mul_assoc]) _) _,
have R : xn (n * k) * yn n + yn (n * k) * xn n ≡
xn n^k * yn n + k * xn n^k * yn n [MOD yn n^3], from
modeq.modeq_add (by rw nat.pow_succ; exact modeq.modeq_mul_right' _ hx) $
have k * xn n^(k - 1) * yn n * xn n = k * xn n^k * yn n,
by clear _let_match; cases k with k; simp [nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm],
by rw ← this; exact modeq.modeq_mul_right _ hy,
by rw [nat.add_sub_cancel, nat.mul_succ, xn_add, yn_add, nat.pow_succ (xn _ n),
nat.succ_mul, add_comm (k * xn _ n^k) (xn _ n^k), right_distrib];
exact ⟨L, R⟩
theorem ysq_dvd_yy (n) : yn n * yn n ∣ yn (n * yn n) :=
modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 $
((xy_modeq_yn n (yn n)).right.modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq $ by simp [nat.pow_succ]).trans
(modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ by simp [mul_dvd_mul_left, mul_assoc])
theorem dvd_of_ysq_dvd {n t} (h : yn n * yn n ∣ yn t) : yn n ∣ t :=
have nt : n ∣ t, from (y_dvd_iff n t).1 $ dvd_of_mul_left_dvd h,
n.eq_zero_or_pos.elim (λn0, by rw n0; rw n0 at nt; exact nt) $ λ(n0l : n > 0),
let ⟨k, ke⟩ := nt in
have yn n ∣ k * (xn n)^(k-1), from
nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (y_increasing n0l) $ modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 $
by have xm := (xy_modeq_yn a1 n k).right; rw ← ke at xm; exact
(xm.modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq $ by simp [nat.pow_succ]).symm.trans
(modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 h),
by rw ke; exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right
(((xy_coprime _ _).pow_left _).symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right this) _
theorem pell_zd_succ_succ (n) : pell_zd (n + 2) + pell_zd n = (2 * a : ℕ) * pell_zd (n + 1) :=
have (1:ℤ√d) + ⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ = ⟨a, 1⟩ * (2 * a),
by rw zsqrtd.coe_nat_val; change (⟨_,_⟩:ℤ√(d a1))=⟨_,_⟩;
rw dz_val; change az a1 with a; simp [mul_add, add_mul],
by simpa [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using congr_arg (* pell_zd a1 n) this
theorem xy_succ_succ (n) : xn (n + 2) + xn n = (2 * a) * xn (n + 1) ∧
yn (n + 2) + yn n = (2 * a) * yn (n + 1) := begin
have := pell_zd_succ_succ a1 n, unfold pell_zd at this,
rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, zsqrtd.smul_val] at this,
injection this with h₁ h₂,
split; apply int.coe_nat_inj; [simpa using h₁, simpa using h₂]
end
theorem xn_succ_succ (n) : xn (n + 2) + xn n = (2 * a) * xn (n + 1) := (xy_succ_succ n).1
theorem yn_succ_succ (n) : yn (n + 2) + yn n = (2 * a) * yn (n + 1) := (xy_succ_succ n).2
theorem xz_succ_succ (n) : xz (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * xz (n + 1) - xz n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by delta xz; rw [← int.coe_nat_add, ← int.coe_nat_mul, xn_succ_succ]
theorem yz_succ_succ (n) : yz (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * yz (n + 1) - yz n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by delta yz; rw [← int.coe_nat_add, ← int.coe_nat_mul, yn_succ_succ]
theorem yn_modeq_a_sub_one : ∀ n, yn n ≡ n [MOD a-1]
| 0 := by simp
| 1 := by simp
| (n+2) := modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right (yn_modeq_a_sub_one n) $
have 2*(n+1) = n+2+n, by simp [two_mul],
by rw [yn_succ_succ, ← this];
refine modeq.modeq_mul (modeq.modeq_mul_left 2 (_ : a ≡ 1 [MOD a-1])) (yn_modeq_a_sub_one (n+1));
exact (modeq.modeq_of_dvd $ by rw [int.coe_nat_sub $ le_of_lt a1]; apply dvd_refl).symm
theorem yn_modeq_two : ∀ n, yn n ≡ n [MOD 2]
| 0 := by simp
| 1 := by simp
| (n+2) := modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right (yn_modeq_two n) $
have 2*(n+1) = n+2+n, by simp [two_mul],
by rw [yn_succ_succ, ← this];
refine modeq.modeq_mul _ (yn_modeq_two (n+1));
exact modeq.trans
(modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ by simp)
(modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ by simp).symm
-- TODO(Mario): Hopefully a tactic will be able to dispense this lemma
lemma x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem (y2 y1 y0 yn1 yn0 xn1 xn0 ay a2 : ℤ) :
(a2 * yn1 - yn0) * ay + y2 - (a2 * xn1 - xn0) =
y2 - a2 * y1 + y0 + a2 * (yn1 * ay + y1 - xn1) - (yn0 * ay + y0 - xn0) :=
calc (a2 * yn1 - yn0) * ay + y2 - (a2 * xn1 - xn0)
= a2 * yn1 * ay - yn0 * ay + y2 - (a2 * xn1 - xn0) : by rw [mul_sub_right_distrib]
... = y2 + a2 * (yn1 * ay) - a2 * xn1 - yn0 * ay + xn0 : by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
... = y2 + a2 * (yn1 * ay) - a2 * y1 + a2 * y1 - a2 * xn1 - yn0 * ay + y0 - y0 + xn0 : by rw [add_sub_cancel, sub_add_cancel]
... = y2 - a2 * y1 + y0 + a2 * (yn1 * ay + y1 - xn1) - (yn0 * ay + y0 - xn0) : by simp [mul_add]
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow (y : ℕ) :
∀ n, (2*a*y - y*y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ yz n * (a - y) + ↑(y^n) - xz n
| 0 := by simp [xz, yz, int.coe_nat_zero, int.coe_nat_one]
| 1 := by simp [xz, yz, int.coe_nat_zero, int.coe_nat_one]
| (n+2) :=
have (2*a*y - y*y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ ↑(y^(n + 2)) - ↑(2 * a) * ↑(y^(n + 1)) + ↑(y^n), from
⟨-↑(y^n), by simp [nat.pow_succ, mul_add, int.coe_nat_mul,
show ((2:ℕ):ℤ) = 2, from rfl, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]⟩,
by rw [xz_succ_succ, yz_succ_succ, x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem a1 ↑(y^(n+2)) ↑(y^(n+1)) ↑(y^n)]; exact
dvd_sub (dvd_add this $ dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (x_sub_y_dvd_pow (n+1)) _) (x_sub_y_dvd_pow n)
theorem xn_modeq_x2n_add_lem (n j) : xn n ∣ d * yn n * (yn n * xn j) + xn j :=
have h1 : d * yn n * (yn n * xn j) + xn j = (d * yn n * yn n + 1) * xn j,
by simp [add_mul, mul_assoc],
have h2 : d * yn n * yn n + 1 = xn n * xn n, by apply int.coe_nat_inj;
repeat {rw int.coe_nat_add <|> rw int.coe_nat_mul}; exact
add_eq_of_eq_sub' (eq.symm $ pell_eqz _ _),
by rw h2 at h1; rw [h1, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
theorem xn_modeq_x2n_add (n j) : xn (2 * n + j) + xn j ≡ 0 [MOD xn n] :=
by rw [two_mul, add_assoc, xn_add, add_assoc]; exact
show _ ≡ 0+0 [MOD xn a1 n], from modeq.modeq_add (modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ dvd_mul_right (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (n + j))) $
by rw [yn_add, left_distrib, add_assoc]; exact
show _ ≡ 0+0 [MOD xn a1 n], from modeq.modeq_add (modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (dvd_mul_right _ _) _) $
modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ xn_modeq_x2n_add_lem _ _ _
lemma xn_modeq_x2n_sub_lem {n j} (h : j ≤ n) : xn (2 * n - j) + xn j ≡ 0 [MOD xn n] :=
have h1 : xz n ∣ ↑d * yz n * yz (n - j) + xz j, by rw [yz_sub _ h, mul_sub_left_distrib, sub_add_eq_add_sub]; exact
dvd_sub
(by delta xz; delta yz;
repeat {rw ← int.coe_nat_add <|> rw ← int.coe_nat_mul}; rw mul_comm (xn a1 j) (yn a1 n);
exact int.coe_nat_dvd.2 (xn_modeq_x2n_add_lem _ _ _))
(dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (dvd_mul_right _ _) _),
by rw [two_mul, nat.add_sub_assoc h, xn_add, add_assoc]; exact
show _ ≡ 0+0 [MOD xn a1 n], from modeq.modeq_add (modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ dvd_mul_right _ _) $
modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.1 $ by simpa [xz, yz] using h1
theorem xn_modeq_x2n_sub {n j} (h : j ≤ 2 * n) : xn (2 * n - j) + xn j ≡ 0 [MOD xn n] :=
(le_total j n).elim xn_modeq_x2n_sub_lem
(λjn, have 2 * n - j + j ≤ n + j, by rw [nat.sub_add_cancel h, two_mul]; exact nat.add_le_add_left jn _,
let t := xn_modeq_x2n_sub_lem (nat.le_of_add_le_add_right this) in by rwa [nat.sub_sub_self h, add_comm] at t)
theorem xn_modeq_x4n_add (n j) : xn (4 * n + j) ≡ xn j [MOD xn n] :=
modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right (modeq.refl $ xn (2 * n + j)) $
by refine @modeq.trans _ _ 0 _ _ (by rw add_comm; exact (xn_modeq_x2n_add _ _ _).symm);
rw [show 4*n = 2*n + 2*n, from right_distrib 2 2 n, add_assoc]; apply xn_modeq_x2n_add
theorem xn_modeq_x4n_sub {n j} (h : j ≤ 2 * n) : xn (4 * n - j) ≡ xn j [MOD xn n] :=
have h' : j ≤ 2*n, from le_trans h (by rw nat.succ_mul; apply nat.le_add_left),
modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right (modeq.refl $ xn (2 * n - j)) $
by refine @modeq.trans _ _ 0 _ _ (by rw add_comm; exact (xn_modeq_x2n_sub _ h).symm);
rw [show 4*n = 2*n + 2*n, from right_distrib 2 2 n, nat.add_sub_assoc h']; apply xn_modeq_x2n_add
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_lem1 {i n} (npos : n > 0) : Π {j}, i < j → j < n → xn i % xn n < xn j % xn n
| 0 ij _ := absurd ij (nat.not_lt_zero _)
| (j+1) ij jn :=
suffices xn j % xn n < xn (j + 1) % xn n, from
(lt_or_eq_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij)).elim
(λh, lt_trans (eq_of_xn_modeq_lem1 h (le_of_lt jn)) this)
(λh, by rw h; exact this),
by rw [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (x_increasing _ (nat.lt_of_succ_lt jn)), nat.mod_eq_of_lt (x_increasing _ jn)];
exact x_increasing _ (nat.lt_succ_self _)
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_lem2 {n} (h : 2 * xn n = xn (n + 1)) : a = 2 ∧ n = 0 :=
by rw [xn_succ, mul_comm] at h; exact
have n = 0, from n.eq_zero_or_pos.resolve_right $ λnp,
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1)
(nat.lt_add_of_pos_right $ mul_pos (d_pos a1) (y_increasing a1 np))) h,
by cases this; simp at h; exact ⟨h.symm, rfl⟩
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_lem3 {i n} (npos : n > 0) :
Π {j}, i < j → j ≤ 2 * n → j ≠ n → ¬(a = 2 ∧ n = 1 ∧ i = 0 ∧ j = 2) → xn i % xn n < xn j % xn n
| 0 ij _ _ _ := absurd ij (nat.not_lt_zero _)
| (j+1) ij j2n jnn ntriv :=
have lem2 : ∀k > n, k ≤ 2*n → (↑(xn k % xn n) : ℤ) = xn n - xn (2 * n - k), from λk kn k2n,
let k2nl := lt_of_add_lt_add_right $ show 2*n-k+k < n+k, by
{rw nat.sub_add_cancel, rw two_mul; exact (add_lt_add_left kn n), exact k2n } in
have xle : xn (2 * n - k) ≤ xn n, from le_of_lt $ x_increasing k2nl,
suffices xn k % xn n = xn n - xn (2 * n - k), by rw [this, int.coe_nat_sub xle],
by {
rw ← nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.sub_lt (x_pos a1 n) (x_pos a1 (2 * n - k))),
apply modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right (modeq.refl (xn a1 (2 * n - k))),
rw [nat.sub_add_cancel xle],
have t := xn_modeq_x2n_sub_lem a1 (le_of_lt k2nl),
rw nat.sub_sub_self k2n at t,
exact t.trans (modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ dvd_refl _).symm },
(lt_trichotomy j n).elim
(λ (jn : j < n), eq_of_xn_modeq_lem1 npos ij (lt_of_le_of_ne jn jnn)) $ λo, o.elim
(λ (jn : j = n), by {
cases jn,
apply int.lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat,
rw [lem2 (n+1) (nat.lt_succ_self _) j2n,
show 2 * n - (n + 1) = n - 1, by rw[two_mul, ← nat.sub_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel]],
refine lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt _),
cases (lt_or_eq_of_le $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij) with lin ein,
{ rw nat.mod_eq_of_lt (x_increasing _ lin),
have ll : xn a1 (n-1) + xn a1 (n-1) ≤ xn a1 n,
{ rw [← two_mul, mul_comm, show xn a1 n = xn a1 (n-1+1), by rw [nat.sub_add_cancel npos], xn_succ],
exact le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1) (nat.le_add_right _ _) },
have npm : (n-1).succ = n := nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos npos,
have il : i ≤ n - 1 := by apply nat.le_of_succ_le_succ; rw npm; exact lin,
cases lt_or_eq_of_le il with ill ile,
{ exact lt_of_lt_of_le (nat.add_lt_add_left (x_increasing a1 ill) _) ll },
{ rw ile,
apply lt_of_le_of_ne ll,
rw ← two_mul,
exact λe, ntriv $
let ⟨a2, s1⟩ := @eq_of_xn_modeq_lem2 _ a1 (n-1) (by rw[nat.sub_add_cancel npos]; exact e) in
have n1 : n = 1, from le_antisymm (nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero s1) npos,
by rw [ile, a2, n1]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ } },
{ rw [ein, nat.mod_self, add_zero],
exact x_increasing _ (nat.pred_lt $ ne_of_gt npos) } })
(λ (jn : j > n),
have lem1 : j ≠ n → xn j % xn n < xn (j + 1) % xn n → xn i % xn n < xn (j + 1) % xn n, from λjn s,
(lt_or_eq_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij)).elim
(λh, lt_trans (eq_of_xn_modeq_lem3 h (le_of_lt j2n) jn $ λ⟨a1, n1, i0, j2⟩,
by rw [n1, j2] at j2n; exact absurd j2n dec_trivial) s)
(λh, by rw h; exact s),
lem1 (ne_of_gt jn) $ int.lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat $ by {
rw [lem2 j jn (le_of_lt j2n), lem2 (j+1) (nat.le_succ_of_le jn) j2n],
refine sub_lt_sub_left (int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt $ x_increasing _ _) _,
rw [nat.sub_succ],
exact nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt $ nat.sub_pos_of_lt j2n) })
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_le {i j n} (npos : n > 0) (ij : i ≤ j) (j2n : j ≤ 2 * n) (h : xn i ≡ xn j [MOD xn n])
(ntriv : ¬(a = 2 ∧ n = 1 ∧ i = 0 ∧ j = 2)) : i = j :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le ij).resolve_left $ λij',
if jn : j = n then by {
refine ne_of_gt _ h,
rw [jn, nat.mod_self],
have x0 : xn a1 0 % xn a1 n > 0 := by rw [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (x_increasing a1 npos)]; exact dec_trivial,
cases i with i, exact x0,
rw jn at ij',
exact lt_trans x0 (eq_of_xn_modeq_lem3 _ npos (nat.succ_pos _) (le_trans ij j2n) (ne_of_lt ij') $
λ⟨a1, n1, _, i2⟩, by rw [n1, i2] at ij'; exact absurd ij' dec_trivial)
} else ne_of_lt (eq_of_xn_modeq_lem3 npos ij' j2n jn ntriv) h
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq {i j n} (npos : n > 0) (i2n : i ≤ 2 * n) (j2n : j ≤ 2 * n) (h : xn i ≡ xn j [MOD xn n])
(ntriv : a = 2 → n = 1 → (i = 0 → j ≠ 2) ∧ (i = 2 → j ≠ 0)) : i = j :=
(le_total i j).elim
(λij, eq_of_xn_modeq_le npos ij j2n h $ λ⟨a2, n1, i0, j2⟩, (ntriv a2 n1).left i0 j2)
(λij, (eq_of_xn_modeq_le npos ij i2n h.symm $ λ⟨a2, n1, j0, i2⟩, (ntriv a2 n1).right i2 j0).symm)
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq' {i j n} (ipos : i > 0) (hin : i ≤ n) (j4n : j ≤ 4 * n) (h : xn j ≡ xn i [MOD xn n]) :
j = i ∨ j + i = 4 * n :=
have i2n : i ≤ 2*n, by apply le_trans hin; rw two_mul; apply nat.le_add_left,
have npos : n > 0, from lt_of_lt_of_le ipos hin,
(le_or_gt j (2 * n)).imp
(λj2n : j ≤ 2*n, eq_of_xn_modeq npos j2n i2n h $
λa2 n1, ⟨λj0 i2, by rw [n1, i2] at hin; exact absurd hin dec_trivial,
λj2 i0, ne_of_gt ipos i0⟩)
(λj2n : j > 2*n, suffices i = 4*n - j, by rw [this, nat.add_sub_of_le j4n],
have j42n : 4*n - j ≤ 2*n, from @nat.le_of_add_le_add_right j _ _ $
by rw [nat.sub_add_cancel j4n, show 4*n = 2*n + 2*n, from right_distrib 2 2 n];
exact nat.add_le_add_left (le_of_lt j2n) _,
eq_of_xn_modeq npos i2n j42n
(h.symm.trans $ let t := xn_modeq_x4n_sub j42n in by rwa [nat.sub_sub_self j4n] at t)
(λa2 n1, ⟨λi0, absurd i0 (ne_of_gt ipos), λi2, by rw[n1, i2] at hin; exact absurd hin dec_trivial⟩))
theorem modeq_of_xn_modeq {i j n} (ipos : i > 0) (hin : i ≤ n) (h : xn j ≡ xn i [MOD xn n]) :
j ≡ i [MOD 4 * n] ∨ j + i ≡ 0 [MOD 4 * n] :=
let j' := j % (4 * n) in
have n4 : 4 * n > 0, from mul_pos dec_trivial (lt_of_lt_of_le ipos hin),
have jl : j' < 4 * n, from nat.mod_lt _ n4,
have jj : j ≡ j' [MOD 4 * n], by delta modeq; rw nat.mod_eq_of_lt jl,
have ∀j q, xn (j + 4 * n * q) ≡ xn j [MOD xn n], begin
intros j q, induction q with q IH, { simp },
rw[nat.mul_succ, ← add_assoc, add_comm],
exact modeq.trans (xn_modeq_x4n_add _ _ _) IH
end,
or.imp
(λ(ji : j' = i), by rwa ← ji)
(λ(ji : j' + i = 4 * n), (modeq.modeq_add jj (modeq.refl _)).trans $
by rw ji; exact modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 (dvd_refl _))
(eq_of_xn_modeq' ipos hin (le_of_lt jl) $
(modeq.symm (by rw ← nat.mod_add_div j (4*n); exact this j' _)).trans h)
end
theorem xy_modeq_of_modeq {a b c} (a1 : a > 1) (b1 : b > 1) (h : a ≡ b [MOD c]) :
∀ n, xn a1 n ≡ xn b1 n [MOD c] ∧ yn a1 n ≡ yn b1 n [MOD c]
| 0 := by constructor; refl
| 1 := by simp; exact ⟨h, modeq.refl 1⟩
| (n+2) := ⟨
modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right (xy_modeq_of_modeq n).left $
by rw [xn_succ_succ a1, xn_succ_succ b1]; exact
modeq.modeq_mul (modeq.modeq_mul_left _ h) (xy_modeq_of_modeq (n+1)).left,
modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right (xy_modeq_of_modeq n).right $
by rw [yn_succ_succ a1, yn_succ_succ b1]; exact
modeq.modeq_mul (modeq.modeq_mul_left _ h) (xy_modeq_of_modeq (n+1)).right⟩
theorem matiyasevic {a k x y} : (∃ a1 : a > 1, xn a1 k = x ∧ yn a1 k = y) ↔
a > 1 ∧ k ≤ y ∧
(x = 1 ∧ y = 0 ∨
∃ (u v s t b : ℕ),
x * x - (a * a - 1) * y * y = 1 ∧
u * u - (a * a - 1) * v * v = 1 ∧
s * s - (b * b - 1) * t * t = 1 ∧
b > 1 ∧ b ≡ 1 [MOD 4 * y] ∧ b ≡ a [MOD u] ∧
v > 0 ∧ y * y ∣ v ∧
s ≡ x [MOD u] ∧
t ≡ k [MOD 4 * y]) :=
⟨λ⟨a1, hx, hy⟩, by rw [← hx, ← hy];
refine ⟨a1, (nat.eq_zero_or_pos k).elim
(λk0, by rw k0; exact ⟨le_refl _, or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩) (λkpos, _)⟩; exact
let x := xn a1 k, y := yn a1 k,
m := 2 * (k * y),
u := xn a1 m, v := yn a1 m in
have ky : k ≤ y, from yn_ge_n a1 k,
have yv : y * y ∣ v, from dvd_trans (ysq_dvd_yy a1 k) $
(y_dvd_iff _ _ _).2 $ dvd_mul_left _ _,
have uco : nat.coprime u (4 * y), from
have 2 ∣ v, from modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 $ (yn_modeq_two _ _).trans $
modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 (dvd_mul_right _ _),
have nat.coprime u 2, from
(xy_coprime a1 m).coprime_dvd_right this,
(this.mul_right this).mul_right $
(xy_coprime _ _).coprime_dvd_right (dvd_of_mul_left_dvd yv),
let ⟨b, ba, bm1⟩ := modeq.chinese_remainder uco a 1 in
have m1 : 1 < m, from
have 0 < k * y, from mul_pos kpos (y_increasing a1 kpos),
nat.mul_le_mul_left 2 this,
have vp : v > 0, from y_increasing a1 (lt_trans zero_lt_one m1),
have b1 : b > 1, from
have u > xn a1 1, from x_increasing a1 m1,
have u > a, by simp at this; exact this,
lt_of_lt_of_le a1 $ by delta modeq at ba;
rw nat.mod_eq_of_lt this at ba; rw ← ba; apply nat.mod_le,
let s := xn b1 k, t := yn b1 k in
have sx : s ≡ x [MOD u], from (xy_modeq_of_modeq b1 a1 ba k).left,
have tk : t ≡ k [MOD 4 * y], from
have 4 * y ∣ b - 1, from int.coe_nat_dvd.1 $
by rw int.coe_nat_sub (le_of_lt b1);
exact modeq.dvd_of_modeq bm1.symm,
modeq.modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq this $ yn_modeq_a_sub_one _ _,
⟨ky, or.inr ⟨u, v, s, t, b,
pell_eq _ _, pell_eq _ _, pell_eq _ _, b1, bm1, ba, vp, yv, sx, tk⟩⟩,
λ⟨a1, ky, o⟩, ⟨a1, match o with
| or.inl ⟨x1, y0⟩ := by rw y0 at ky; rw [nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero ky, x1, y0]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
| or.inr ⟨u, v, s, t, b, xy, uv, st, b1, rem⟩ :=
match x, y, eq_pell a1 xy, u, v, eq_pell a1 uv, s, t, eq_pell b1 st, rem, ky with
| ._, ._, ⟨i, rfl, rfl⟩, ._, ._, ⟨n, rfl, rfl⟩, ._, ._, ⟨j, rfl, rfl⟩,
⟨(bm1 : b ≡ 1 [MOD 4 * yn a1 i]),
(ba : b ≡ a [MOD xn a1 n]),
(vp : yn a1 n > 0),
(yv : yn a1 i * yn a1 i ∣ yn a1 n),
(sx : xn b1 j ≡ xn a1 i [MOD xn a1 n]),
(tk : yn b1 j ≡ k [MOD 4 * yn a1 i])⟩,
(ky : k ≤ yn a1 i) :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos i).elim
(λi0, by simp [i0] at ky; rw [i0, ky]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩) $ λipos,
suffices i = k, by rw this; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
by clear _x o rem xy uv st _match _match _fun_match; exact
have iln : i ≤ n, from le_of_not_gt $ λhin,
not_lt_of_ge (nat.le_of_dvd vp (dvd_of_mul_left_dvd yv)) (y_increasing a1 hin),
have yd : 4 * yn a1 i ∣ 4 * n, from mul_dvd_mul_left _ $ dvd_of_ysq_dvd a1 yv,
have jk : j ≡ k [MOD 4 * yn a1 i], from
have 4 * yn a1 i ∣ b - 1, from int.coe_nat_dvd.1 $
by rw int.coe_nat_sub (le_of_lt b1); exact modeq.dvd_of_modeq bm1.symm,
(modeq.modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq this (yn_modeq_a_sub_one b1 _)).symm.trans tk,
have ki : k + i < 4 * yn a1 i, from
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add ky (yn_ge_n a1 i)) $
by rw ← two_mul; exact nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right dec_trivial (y_increasing a1 ipos),
have ji : j ≡ i [MOD 4 * n], from
have xn a1 j ≡ xn a1 i [MOD xn a1 n], from (xy_modeq_of_modeq b1 a1 ba j).left.symm.trans sx,
(modeq_of_xn_modeq a1 ipos iln this).resolve_right $ λ (ji : j + i ≡ 0 [MOD 4 * n]),
not_le_of_gt ki $ nat.le_of_dvd (lt_of_lt_of_le ipos $ nat.le_add_left _ _) $
modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 $ (modeq.modeq_add jk.symm (modeq.refl i)).trans $
modeq.modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq yd ji,
by have : i % (4 * yn a1 i) = k % (4 * yn a1 i) :=
(modeq.modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq yd ji).symm.trans jk;
rwa [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le_add_left _ _) ki),
nat.mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le_add_right _ _) ki)] at this
end
end⟩⟩
lemma eq_pow_of_pell_lem {a y k} (a1 : 1 < a) (ypos : y > 0) : k > 0 → a > y^k →
(↑(y^k) : ℤ) < 2*a*y - y*y - 1 :=
have y < a → 2*a*y ≥ a + (y*y + 1), begin
intro ya, induction y with y IH, exact absurd ypos (lt_irrefl _),
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos y with y0 ypos,
{ rw y0, simp [two_mul], apply add_le_add_left, exact a1 },
{ rw [nat.mul_succ, nat.mul_succ, nat.succ_mul y],
have : 2 * a ≥ y + nat.succ y,
{ change y + y < 2 * a, rw ← two_mul,
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (nat.lt_of_succ_lt ya) dec_trivial },
have := add_le_add (IH ypos (nat.lt_of_succ_lt ya)) this,
simp at this, simp, exact this }
end, λk0 yak,
lt_of_lt_of_le (int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt yak) $
by rw sub_sub; apply le_sub_right_of_add_le;
apply int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le;
have y1 := nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right ypos k0; simp at y1;
exact this (lt_of_le_of_lt y1 yak)
theorem eq_pow_of_pell {m n k} : (n^k = m ↔
k = 0 ∧ m = 1 ∨ k > 0 ∧
(n = 0 ∧ m = 0 ∨ n > 0 ∧
∃ (w a t z : ℕ) (a1 : a > 1),
xn a1 k ≡ yn a1 k * (a - n) + m [MOD t] ∧
2 * a * n = t + (n * n + 1) ∧
m < t ∧ n ≤ w ∧ k ≤ w ∧
a * a - ((w + 1) * (w + 1) - 1) * (w * z) * (w * z) = 1)) :=
⟨λe, by rw ← e;
refine (nat.eq_zero_or_pos k).elim
(λk0, by rw k0; exact or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
(λkpos, or.inr ⟨kpos, _⟩);
refine (nat.eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λn0, by rw [n0, nat.zero_pow kpos]; exact or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
(λnpos, or.inr ⟨npos, _⟩); exact
let w := _root_.max n k in
have nw : n ≤ w, from le_max_left _ _,
have kw : k ≤ w, from le_max_right _ _,
have wpos : w > 0, from lt_of_lt_of_le npos nw,
have w1 : w + 1 > 1, from nat.succ_lt_succ wpos,
let a := xn w1 w in
have a1 : a > 1, from x_increasing w1 wpos,
let x := xn a1 k, y := yn a1 k in
let ⟨z, ze⟩ := show w ∣ yn w1 w, from modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 $
modeq.trans (yn_modeq_a_sub_one w1 w) (modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 $ dvd_refl _) in
have nt : (↑(n^k) : ℤ) < 2 * a * n - n * n - 1, from
eq_pow_of_pell_lem a1 npos kpos $ calc
n^k ≤ n^w : nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right npos kw
... < (w + 1)^w : nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left (nat.lt_succ_of_le nw) wpos
... ≤ a : xn_ge_a_pow w1 w,
let ⟨t, te⟩ := int.eq_coe_of_zero_le $
le_trans (int.coe_zero_le _) $ le_of_lt nt in
have na : n ≤ a, from le_trans nw $ le_of_lt $ n_lt_xn w1 w,
have tm : x ≡ y * (a - n) + n^k [MOD t], begin
apply modeq.modeq_of_dvd,
rw [int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_mul, int.coe_nat_sub na, ← te],
exact x_sub_y_dvd_pow a1 n k
end,
have ta : 2 * a * n = t + (n * n + 1), from int.coe_nat_inj $
by rw [int.coe_nat_add, ← te, sub_sub];
repeat {rw int.coe_nat_add <|> rw int.coe_nat_mul};
rw [int.coe_nat_one, sub_add_cancel]; refl,
have mt : n^k < t, from int.lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat $
by rw ← te; exact nt,
have zp : a * a - ((w + 1) * (w + 1) - 1) * (w * z) * (w * z) = 1,
by rw ← ze; exact pell_eq w1 w,
⟨w, a, t, z, a1, tm, ta, mt, nw, kw, zp⟩,
λo, match o with
| or.inl ⟨k0, m1⟩ := by rw [k0, m1]; refl
| or.inr ⟨kpos, or.inl ⟨n0, m0⟩⟩ := by rw [n0, m0, nat.zero_pow kpos]
| or.inr ⟨kpos, or.inr ⟨npos, w, a, t, z,
(a1 : a > 1),
(tm : xn a1 k ≡ yn a1 k * (a - n) + m [MOD t]),
(ta : 2 * a * n = t + (n * n + 1)),
(mt : m < t),
(nw : n ≤ w),
(kw : k ≤ w),
(zp : a * a - ((w + 1) * (w + 1) - 1) * (w * z) * (w * z) = 1)⟩⟩ :=
have wpos : w > 0, from lt_of_lt_of_le npos nw,
have w1 : w + 1 > 1, from nat.succ_lt_succ wpos,
let ⟨j, xj, yj⟩ := eq_pell w1 zp in
by clear _match o _let_match; exact
have jpos : j > 0, from (nat.eq_zero_or_pos j).resolve_left $ λj0,
have a1 : a = 1, by rw j0 at xj; exact xj,
have 2 * n = t + (n * n + 1), by rw a1 at ta; exact ta,
have n1 : n = 1, from
have n * n < n * 2, by rw [mul_comm n 2, this]; apply nat.le_add_left,
have n ≤ 1, from nat.le_of_lt_succ $ lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left this (nat.zero_le _),
le_antisymm this npos,
by rw n1 at this;
rw ← @nat.add_right_cancel 0 2 t this at mt;
exact nat.not_lt_zero _ mt,
have wj : w ≤ j, from nat.le_of_dvd jpos $ modeq.modeq_zero_iff.1 $
(yn_modeq_a_sub_one w1 j).symm.trans $
modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 ⟨z, yj.symm⟩,
have nt : (↑(n^k) : ℤ) < 2 * a * n - n * n - 1, from
eq_pow_of_pell_lem a1 npos kpos $ calc
n^k ≤ n^j : nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right npos (le_trans kw wj)
... < (w + 1)^j : nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left (nat.lt_succ_of_le nw) jpos
... ≤ xn w1 j : xn_ge_a_pow w1 j
... = a : xj.symm,
have na : n ≤ a, by rw xj; exact
le_trans (le_trans nw wj) (le_of_lt $ n_lt_xn _ _),
have te : (t : ℤ) = 2 * ↑a * ↑n - ↑n * ↑n - 1, by
rw sub_sub; apply eq_sub_of_add_eq; apply (int.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff _ _).2;
exact ta.symm,
have xn a1 k ≡ yn a1 k * (a - n) + n^k [MOD t],
by have := x_sub_y_dvd_pow a1 n k;
rw [← te, ← int.coe_nat_sub na] at this; exact modeq.modeq_of_dvd this,
have n^k % t = m % t, from
modeq.modeq_add_cancel_left (modeq.refl _) (this.symm.trans tm),
by rw ← te at nt;
rwa [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (int.lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat nt), nat.mod_eq_of_lt mt] at this
end⟩
end pell
|
507756e0ba165a13e2cbe760bb0b2a03520df28f | 32317185abf7e7c963f4c67c190aec61af6b3628 | /tests/lean/extra/show_goal.lean | 5dba4c039bb0add03423c1b6f3cb19cb2c71f942 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Andrew-Zipperer-unorganized/lean | 198a2317f21198cd8d26e7085e484b86277f17f7 | dcb35008e1474a0abebe632b1dced120e5f8c009 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,526,520,945 | 1,453,576,559,000 | 1,454,612,842,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 569 | lean | import data.nat
open nat algebra
example (a b c d : nat) : a + b = 0 → b = 0 → c + 1 + a = 1 → d = c - 1 → d = 0 :=
begin
intro h₁ h₂,
have aeq0 : a = 0, begin
rewrite h₂ at h₁,
exact h₁
end,
intro h₃ h₄,
have deq0 : d = 0, begin
have ceq : c = 0, begin
rewrite aeq0 at h₃,
rewrite add_zero at h₃,
rewrite add_succ at h₃,
krewrite add_zero at h₃,
injection h₃, exact a_1
end,
rewrite ceq at h₄,
repeat (esimp [sub, pred] at h₄),
exact h₄
end,
exact deq0
end
|
5277ed2bbab37072f117b2fa5527675adc9fba82 | 31f556cdeb9239ffc2fad8f905e33987ff4feab9 | /stage0/src/Lean/Compiler/LCNF/Simp/ConstantFold.lean | a0a2d4f8e26f90d461938af08ce9af9316ff9898 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | tobiasgrosser/lean4 | ce0fd9cca0feba1100656679bf41f0bffdbabb71 | ebdbdc10436a4d9d6b66acf78aae7a23f5bd073f | refs/heads/master | 1,673,103,412,948 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 186,870,185 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,129,237,000 | 1,557,939,901,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,152 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Henrik Böving. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Henrik Böving
-/
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.CompilerM
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.InferType
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.PassManager
namespace Lean.Compiler.LCNF.Simp
namespace ConstantFold
/--
A constant folding monad, the additional state stores auxiliary declarations
required to build the new constant.
-/
abbrev FolderM := StateRefT (Array CodeDecl) CompilerM
/--
A constant folder for a specific function, takes all the arguments of a
certain function and produces a new `Expr` + auxiliary declarations in
the `FolderM` monad on success. If the folding fails it returns `none`.
-/
abbrev Folder := Array Expr → FolderM (Option Expr)
/--
A typeclass for detecting and producing literals of arbitrary types
inside of LCNF.
-/
class Literal (α : Type) where
/--
Attempt to turn the provied `Expr` into a value of type `α` if
it is whatever concept of a literal `α` has. Note that this function
does assume that the provided `Expr` does indeed have type `α`.
-/
getLit : Expr → CompilerM (Option α)
/--
Turn a value of type `α` into a series of auxiliary `LetDecl`s + a
final `Expr` putting them all together into a literal of type `α`,
where again the idea of what a literal is depends on `α`.
-/
mkLit : α → FolderM Expr
export Literal (getLit mkLit)
/--
A wrapper around `LCNF.mkAuxLetDecl` that will automaticaly store the
`LetDecl` in the state of `FolderM`.
-/
def mkAuxLetDecl (e : Expr) (prefixName := `_x) : FolderM FVarId := do
let decl ← LCNF.mkAuxLetDecl e prefixName
modify fun s => s.push <| .let decl
return decl.fvarId
section Literals
/--
A wrapper around `mkAuxLetDecl` that also calls `mkLit`.
-/
def mkAuxLit [Literal α] (x : α) (prefixName := `_x) : FolderM FVarId := do
let lit ← mkLit x
mkAuxLetDecl lit prefixName
partial def getNatLit (e : Expr) : CompilerM (Option Nat) := do
match e with
| .lit (.natVal n) .. => return n
| .fvar fvarId .. =>
if let some decl ← findLetDecl? fvarId then
getNatLit decl.value
else
return none
| _ => return none
def mkNatLit (n : Nat) : FolderM Expr :=
return .lit (.natVal n)
instance : Literal Nat where
getLit := getNatLit
mkLit := mkNatLit
partial def getStringLit (e : Expr) : CompilerM (Option String) := do
match e with
| .lit (.strVal n) .. => return n
| .fvar fvarId .. =>
let some decl ← findLetDecl? fvarId | return none
getStringLit decl.value
| _ => return none
def mkStringLit (n : String) : FolderM Expr :=
return .lit (.strVal n)
instance : Literal String where
getLit := getStringLit
mkLit := mkStringLit
private partial def getLitAux [Inhabited α] (e : Expr) (ofNat : Nat → α) (ofNatName : Name) (toNat : α → Nat) : CompilerM (Option α) := do
match e with
| .fvar fvarId .. =>
if let some decl ←findLetDecl? fvarId then
getLitAux decl.value ofNat ofNatName toNat
else
return none
| .app .. =>
match e.getAppFn, e.getAppArgs with
| .const name .., #[.fvar fvarId] =>
if name == ofNatName then
if let some natLit ← getLit (.fvar fvarId) then
return ofNat natLit
return none
| _, _ => return none
| _ => return none
def mkNatWrapperInstance [Inhabited α] (ofNat : Nat → α) (ofNatName : Name) (toNat : α → Nat) : Literal α where
getLit := (getLitAux · ofNat ofNatName toNat)
mkLit x := do
let helperId ← mkAuxLit <| toNat x
return .app (mkConst ofNatName) (.fvar helperId)
instance : Literal UInt8 := mkNatWrapperInstance UInt8.ofNat ``UInt8.ofNat UInt8.toNat
instance : Literal UInt16 := mkNatWrapperInstance UInt16.ofNat ``UInt16.ofNat UInt16.toNat
instance : Literal UInt32 := mkNatWrapperInstance UInt32.ofNat ``UInt32.ofNat UInt32.toNat
instance : Literal UInt64 := mkNatWrapperInstance UInt64.ofNat ``UInt64.ofNat UInt64.toNat
instance : Literal Char := mkNatWrapperInstance Char.ofNat ``Char.ofNat Char.toNat
end Literals
/--
Turns an expression chain of the form
```
let _x.1 := @List.nil _
let _x.2 := @List.cons _ a _x.1
let _x.3 := @List.cons _ b _x.2
let _x.4 := @List.cons _ c _x.3
let _x.5 := @List.cons _ d _x.4
let _x.6 := @List.cons _ e _x.5
```
into: `[a, b, c, d ,e]` + The type contained in the list
-/
partial def getPseudoListLiteral (e : Expr) : CompilerM (Option (List FVarId × Expr × Level)) := do
go e []
where
go (e : Expr) (fvarIds : List FVarId) : CompilerM (Option (List FVarId × Expr × Level)) := do
match e with
| .app .. =>
if some ``List.nil == e.getAppFn.constName? then
return some (fvarIds.reverse, e.getAppArgs[0]!, e.getAppFn.constLevels![0]!)
else if some ``List.cons == e.getAppFn.constName? then
let args := e.getAppArgs
go args[2]! (args[1]!.fvarId! :: fvarIds)
else
return none
| .fvar fvarId =>
if let some decl ← findLetDecl? fvarId then
go decl.value fvarIds
else
return none
| _ =>
return none
/--
Turn an `#[a, b, c]` into:
```
let _x.12 := 3
let _x.8 := @Array.mkEmpty _ _x.12
let _x.22 := @Array.push _ _x.8 x
let _x.24 := @Array.push _ _x.22 y
let _x.26 := @Array.push _ _x.24 z
_x.26
```
-/
def mkPseudoArrayLiteral (elements : Array FVarId) (typ : Expr) (typLevel : Level) : FolderM Expr := do
let sizeLit ← mkAuxLit elements.size
let mut literal ← mkAuxLetDecl <| mkApp2 (mkConst ``Array.mkEmpty [typLevel]) typ (.fvar sizeLit)
for element in elements do
literal ← mkAuxLetDecl <| mkApp3 (mkConst ``Array.push [typLevel]) typ (.fvar literal) (.fvar element)
return .fvar literal
/--
Evaluate array literals at compile time, that is turn:
```
let _x.1 := @List.nil _
let _x.2 := @List.cons _ z _x.1
let _x.3 := @List.cons _ y _x.2
let _x.4 := @List.cons _ x _x.3
let _x.5 := @List.toArray _ _x.4
```
To its array form:
```
let _x.12 := 3
let _x.8 := @Array.mkEmpty _ _x.12
let _x.22 := @Array.push _ _x.8 x
let _x.24 := @Array.push _ _x.22 y
let _x.26 := @Array.push _ _x.24 z
```
-/
def foldArrayLiteral : Folder := fun exprs => do
if h:exprs.size = 2 then
have h1 : 1 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
if let some (list, typ, level) ← getPseudoListLiteral exprs[1] then
let arr := Array.mk list
let lit ← mkPseudoArrayLiteral arr typ level
return some lit
return none
/--
Turn a unary function such as `Nat.succ` into a constant folder.
-/
def Folder.mkUnary [Literal α] [Literal β] (folder : α → β) : Folder := fun exprs => do
if h:exprs.size = 1 then
have h1 : 0 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
if let some arg1 ← getLit exprs[0] then
let res := folder arg1
return (←mkLit res)
return none
/--
Turn a binary function such as `Nat.add` into a constant folder.
-/
def Folder.mkBinary [Literal α] [Literal β] [Literal γ] (folder : α → β → γ) : Folder := fun exprs => do
if h:exprs.size = 2 then
have h1 : 0 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
have h2 : 1 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
if let some arg1 ← getLit exprs[0] then
if let some arg2 ← getLit exprs[1] then
let res := folder arg1 arg2
return (←mkLit res)
return none
/--
Provide a folder for an operation with a left neutral element.
-/
def Folder.leftNeutral [Literal α] [BEq α] (neutral : α) : Folder := fun exprs => do
if h:exprs.size = 2 then
have h1 : 0 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
have h2 : 1 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
if let some arg1 ← getLit exprs[0] then
if arg1 == neutral then
return exprs[1]
return none
/--
Provide a folder for an operation with a right neutral element.
-/
def Folder.rightNeutral [Literal α] [BEq α] (neutral : α) : Folder := fun exprs => do
if h:exprs.size = 2 then
have h1 : 0 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
have h2 : 1 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
if let some arg2 ← getLit exprs[1] then
if arg2 == neutral then
return exprs[0]
return none
/--
Provide a folder for an operation with a left annihilator.
-/
def Folder.leftAnnihilator [Literal α] [BEq α] (annihilator : α) (zero : α) : Folder := fun exprs => do
if h:exprs.size = 2 then
have h1 : 0 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
if let some arg1 ← getLit exprs[0] then
if arg1 == annihilator then
return (←mkLit zero)
return none
/--
Provide a folder for an operation with a right annihilator.
-/
def Folder.rightAnnihilator [Literal α] [BEq α] (annihilator : α) (zero : α) : Folder := fun exprs => do
if h:exprs.size = 2 then
have h1 : 1 < Array.size exprs := by simp_all
if let some arg2 ← getLit exprs[1] then
if arg2 == annihilator then
return (←mkLit zero)
return none
/--
Pick the first folder out of `folders` that succeeds.
-/
def Folder.first (folders : Array Folder) : Folder := fun exprs => do
let backup ← get
for folder in folders do
if let some res ← folder exprs then
return res
else
set backup
return none
/--
Provide a folder for an operation that has the same left and right neutral element.
-/
def Folder.leftRightNeutral [Literal α] [BEq α] (neutral : α) : Folder :=
Folder.first #[Folder.leftNeutral neutral, Folder.rightNeutral neutral]
/--
Provide a folder for an operation that has the same left and right annihilator.
-/
def Folder.leftRightAnnihilator [Literal α] [BEq α] (annihilator : α) (zero : α) : Folder :=
Folder.first #[Folder.leftAnnihilator annihilator zero, Folder.rightAnnihilator annihilator zero]
/--
Literal folders for higher order datastructures.
-/
def higherOrderLiteralFolders : List (Name × Folder) := [
(``List.toArray, foldArrayLiteral)
]
/--
All arithmetic folders.
-/
def arithmeticFolders : List (Name × Folder) := [
(``Nat.succ, Folder.mkUnary Nat.succ),
(``Nat.add, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary Nat.add, Folder.leftRightNeutral 0]),
(``UInt8.add, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt8.add, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt8)]),
(``UInt16.add, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt16.add, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt16)]),
(``UInt32.add, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt32.add, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt32)]),
(``UInt64.add, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt64.add, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt64)]),
(``Nat.sub, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary Nat.sub, Folder.leftRightNeutral 0]),
(``UInt8.sub, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt8.sub, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt8)]),
(``UInt16.sub, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt16.sub, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt16)]),
(``UInt32.sub, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt32.sub, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt32)]),
(``UInt64.sub, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt64.sub, Folder.leftRightNeutral (0 : UInt64)]),
(``Nat.mul, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary Nat.mul, Folder.leftRightNeutral 1, Folder.leftRightAnnihilator 0 0]),
(``UInt8.mul, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt8.mul, Folder.leftRightNeutral (1 : UInt8), Folder.leftRightAnnihilator (0 : UInt8) 0]),
(``UInt16.mul, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt16.mul, Folder.leftRightNeutral (1 : UInt16), Folder.leftRightAnnihilator (0 : UInt16) 0]),
(``UInt32.mul, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt32.mul, Folder.leftRightNeutral (1 : UInt32), Folder.leftRightAnnihilator (0 : UInt32) 0]),
(``UInt64.mul, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt64.mul, Folder.leftRightNeutral (1 : UInt64), Folder.leftRightAnnihilator (0 : UInt64) 0]),
(``Nat.div, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary Nat.div, Folder.rightNeutral 1]),
(``UInt8.div, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt8.div, Folder.rightNeutral (1 : UInt8)]),
(``UInt16.div, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt16.div, Folder.rightNeutral (1 : UInt16)]),
(``UInt32.div, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt32.div, Folder.rightNeutral (1 : UInt32)]),
(``UInt64.div, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary UInt64.div, Folder.rightNeutral (1 : UInt64)])
]
/--
All string folders.
-/
def stringFolders : List (Name × Folder) := [
(``String.append, Folder.first #[Folder.mkBinary String.append, Folder.leftRightNeutral ""]),
(``String.length, Folder.mkUnary String.length),
(``String.push, Folder.mkBinary String.push)
]
/--
Apply all known folders to `decl`.
-/
def applyFolders (decl : LetDecl) (folders : SMap Name Folder) : CompilerM (Option (Array CodeDecl)) := do
let e := decl.value
match e with
| .app .. =>
match e.getAppFn with
| .const name .. =>
if let some folder := folders.find? name then
if let (some res, aux) ← folder e.getAppArgs |>.run #[] then
let decl ← decl.updateValue res
return some <| aux.push (.let decl)
return none
| _ => return none
| .const .. | .lit .. | .fvar .. | .bvar .. | .lam .. | .sort .. |
.forallE .. | .letE .. | .mdata .. =>
return none
-- TODO: support for constant folding on projections
| .proj .. => return none
| _ => unreachable!
private unsafe def getFolderCoreUnsafe (env : Environment) (opts : Options) (declName : Name) : ExceptT String Id Folder :=
env.evalConstCheck Folder opts ``Folder declName
@[implementedBy getFolderCoreUnsafe]
private opaque getFolderCore (env : Environment) (opts : Options) (declName : Name) : ExceptT String Id Folder
private def getFolder (declName : Name) : CoreM Folder := do
ofExcept <| getFolderCore (← getEnv) (← getOptions) declName
def builtinFolders : SMap Name Folder :=
(arithmeticFolders ++ higherOrderLiteralFolders ++ stringFolders).foldl (init := {}) fun s (declName, folder) =>
s.insert declName folder
structure FolderOleanEntry where
declName : Name
folderDeclName : Name
structure FolderEntry extends FolderOleanEntry where
folder : Folder
builtin_initialize folderExt : PersistentEnvExtension FolderOleanEntry FolderEntry (List FolderOleanEntry × SMap Name Folder) ←
registerPersistentEnvExtension {
name := `cfolder
mkInitial := return ([], builtinFolders)
addImportedFn := fun entriesArray => do
let ctx ← read
let mut folders := builtinFolders
for entries in entriesArray do
for { declName, folderDeclName } in entries do
let folder ← IO.ofExcept <| getFolderCore ctx.env ctx.opts folderDeclName
folders := folders.insert declName folder
return ([], folders.switch)
addEntryFn := fun (entries, map) entry => (entry.toFolderOleanEntry :: entries, map.insert entry.declName entry.folder)
exportEntriesFn := fun (entries, _) => entries.reverse.toArray
}
def registerFolder (declName : Name) (folderDeclName : Name) : CoreM Unit := do
let folder ← getFolder folderDeclName
modifyEnv fun env => folderExt.addEntry env { declName, folderDeclName, folder }
def getFolders : CoreM (SMap Name Folder) :=
return folderExt.getState (← getEnv) |>.2
/--
Apply a list of default folders to `decl`
-/
def foldConstants (decl : LetDecl) : CompilerM (Option (Array CodeDecl)) := do
applyFolders decl (← getFolders)
end ConstantFold
end Lean.Compiler.LCNF.Simp
|
3bf58569de4220f4894dd7ea829a37c84f1feb86 | 680fb1fcc7ff570fed489d49ab9e92006811c904 | /src/category/classes.lean | 7128cbe4fff2e5802ee8b5a021702974ebe4abfc | [] | no_license | unitb/lean-lens | 0432d9561d8459124e46f7fc590f12249eca570f | 42a50e1538ebed352a440b4c40ce81caab59a97f | refs/heads/master | 1,584,264,632,380 | 1,525,401,777,000 | 1,525,401,777,000 | 132,076,578 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,664 | lean |
import util.data.sum
universes u v
def arrow (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) := α → β
class profunctor (p : Type u → Type u → Type u) :=
(dimap : Π {α α' β β'}, (α' → α) → (β → β') → p α β → p α' β')
(dimap_id : ∀ {α β} (x : p α β), dimap id id x = x)
(dimap_map : ∀ {α α' α'' β β' β''}
(f : α → α') (f' : α' → α'')
(g : β → β') (g' : β' → β'')
(x : p α'' β),
dimap (f' ∘ f) (g' ∘ g) x = dimap f g' (dimap f' g x))
export profunctor ( dimap )
open sum functor
class choice (p : Type u → Type u → Type u) extends profunctor p :=
(left : Π {α β : Type u} (γ : Type u), p α β → p (α ⊕ γ) (β ⊕ γ))
(right : Π {α β : Type u} (γ : Type u), p α β → p (γ ⊕ α) (γ ⊕ β))
(dimap_swap_right_eq_left : Π {α β γ : Type u} (x : p α β), dimap swap swap (right γ x) = left γ x)
(right_dimap : Π {α α' β β' γ : Type u} (x : p α β) (f : α' → α) (g : β → β'),
right γ (dimap f g x) = dimap (map f) (map g) (right γ x))
instance : profunctor arrow :=
{ dimap := λ α α' β β' f g x, g ∘ x ∘ f
, dimap_id := by { intros, refl }
, dimap_map := by { intros, simp } }
instance : choice arrow :=
{ left := by { introv x i, cases i,
{ left, apply x i },
{ right, exact i } }
, right := by { introv x i, cases i,
{ left, exact i },
{ right, apply x i } }
, dimap_swap_right_eq_left := by { intros, simp, funext y, cases y ; refl, }
, right_dimap := by { simp_intros, funext, casesm _ ⊕ _ ; refl }
}
|
b4861e28fd100893f570f2248251943af06a83c0 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/group_theory/p_group.lean | a823afe24c0fd290ddb1e124b4df9cbdbc63bb48 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,751 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 . All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import group_theory.group_action.basic
import data.fintype.card
import data.zmod.basic
/-!
# p-groups
This file contains a proof that if `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`,
then the number of fixed points of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α`.
It also contains proofs of some corollaries of this lemma about existence of fixed points.
-/
namespace mul_action
open fintype equiv finset subgroup
open_locale big_operators classical
variables {G : Type*} (α : Type*) [group G] [mul_action G α] [fintype G] [fintype α]
[fintype (fixed_points G α)] {p n : ℕ} [fact p.prime] (hG : card G = p ^ n)
include hG
/-- If `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`, then the number of fixed points
of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α` -/
lemma card_modeq_card_fixed_points : card α ≡ card (fixed_points G α) [MOD p] :=
calc card α = card (Σ y : quotient (orbit_rel G α), {x // quotient.mk' x = y}) :
card_congr (sigma_preimage_equiv (@quotient.mk' _ (orbit_rel G α))).symm
... = ∑ a : quotient (orbit_rel G α), card {x // quotient.mk' x = a} : card_sigma _
... ≡ ∑ a : fixed_points G α, 1 [MOD p] :
begin
rw [←zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat p, nat.cast_sum, nat.cast_sum],
refine eq.symm (sum_bij_ne_zero (λ a _ _, quotient.mk' a.1)
(λ _ _ _, mem_univ _)
(λ a₁ a₂ _ _ _ _ h,
subtype.eq ((mem_fixed_points' α).1 a₂.2 a₁.1 (quotient.exact' h)))
(λ b, _)
(λ a ha _, by rw [← mem_fixed_points_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.1 a.2];
simp only [quotient.eq']; congr)),
{ refine quotient.induction_on' b (λ b _ hb, _),
have : card (orbit G b) ∣ p ^ n,
{ rw [← hG, fintype.card_congr (orbit_equiv_quotient_stabilizer G b)],
exact card_quotient_dvd_card _ },
rcases (nat.dvd_prime_pow (fact.out p.prime)).1 this with ⟨k, _, hk⟩,
have hb' :¬ p ^ 1 ∣ p ^ k,
{ rw [pow_one, ← hk, ← nat.modeq_zero_iff_dvd, ← zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat,
nat.cast_zero, ← ne.def],
exact eq.mpr (by simp only [quotient.eq']; congr) hb },
have : k = 0 := nat.le_zero_iff.1 (nat.le_of_lt_succ (lt_of_not_ge (mt (pow_dvd_pow p) hb'))),
refine ⟨⟨b, mem_fixed_points_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.2 $ by rw [hk, this, pow_zero]⟩,
mem_univ _, _, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.cast_one], exact one_ne_zero }
end
... = _ : by simp; refl
/-- If a p-group acts on `α` and the cardinality of `α` is not a multiple
of `p` then the action has a fixed point. -/
lemma nonempty_fixed_point_of_prime_not_dvd_card
(hp : ¬ p ∣ fintype.card α) :
(fixed_points G α).nonempty :=
@set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype _ _ begin
rw [← fintype.card_pos_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero],
assume h,
have := card_modeq_card_fixed_points α hG,
rw [h, nat.modeq_zero_iff_dvd] at this,
contradiction
end
/-- If a p-group acts on `α` and the cardinality of `α` is a multiple
of `p`, and the action has one fixed point, then it has another fixed point. -/
lemma exists_fixed_point_of_prime_dvd_card_of_fixed_point
(hpα : p ∣ fintype.card α) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ fixed_points G α) :
∃ b, b ∈ fixed_points G α ∧ a ≠ b :=
have hpf : p ∣ fintype.card (fixed_points G α),
from nat.modeq_zero_iff_dvd.1 ((card_modeq_card_fixed_points α hG).symm.trans hpα.modeq_zero_nat),
have hα : 1 < fintype.card (fixed_points G α),
from (fact.out p.prime).one_lt.trans_le (nat.le_of_dvd (fintype.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) hpf),
let ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, hba⟩ := exists_ne_of_one_lt_card hα ⟨a, ha⟩ in
⟨b, hb, λ hab, hba $ by simp [hab]⟩
end mul_action
|
7b767be18f249a7ba85c31e8ab5626aeda086529 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /test/logic_inline.lean | 132e74f862289e304c9a970b49673f0306127ca3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 418 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Keeley Hoek. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Keeley Hoek, Floris van Doorn
-/
import logic.basic
meta def error_msg (s : string) : bool := @undefined_core bool $ s ++ ".decidable not inlined"
meta def examine (b : Prop) [decidable b] : bool := b
#eval examine $ ff ∧ (error_msg "and")
#eval examine $ tt ∨ (error_msg "or")
|
57985462695d09590b40c503bbe501ad4e3b191a | d450724ba99f5b50b57d244eb41fef9f6789db81 | /src/mywork/lectures/lecture_26.lean | 215130b0b501af43cf17aa06ef1165ee71eeb297 | [] | no_license | jakekauff/CS2120F21 | 4f009adeb4ce4a148442b562196d66cc6c04530c | e69529ec6f5d47a554291c4241a3d8ec4fe8f5ad | refs/heads/main | 1,693,841,880,030 | 1,637,604,848,000 | 1,637,604,848,000 | 399,946,698 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,350 | lean | import data.set
/-
Operations on relations
-/
/-
We now change our attention to binary relations
more generally: not just from β → β but between
different types, α and β. Not the change in the
type of r as defined here.
-/
variables {α β γ : Type} (r : α → β → Prop)
local infix `≺`:50 := r
/-
We will call the set of all α values the "domain"
of the relation r, and we will call the set of all
β values the "codomain" of r. Now the (a, b) pairs
of r represent the pairs of values for which r a b
is true. You can visualized such an (a, b) pair as
an arrow from a in the domain to b in the codomain.
Not every value in α needs to be present in the
set of "a" values that appear as first elements
in the pairs of r. The subset of a values that
do appear in the first position of some pair in
r is what we will call the domain of definition
of the relation.
The set of b values that appear in the second
positions in all such pairs of r is the set we
will call the *range* of the r.
Be able to write the formal definitions, which
we present next, from your memory and even
more from understanding of what they mean. If
you understand, then you should be able to write
the formal definitions without having memorized
them.
-/
/-
We begin with sets involved in any relation,
r : α → β → Prop. For simplicity we'll assume
that the domain set in examples that follow is
specified by the type α, and that the co-domain
set is specificed by the β type.
-/
def dom (r : α → β → Prop) : set α := { a : α | true }
def codom (r : α → β → Prop) : set β := { b : β | true }
def dom_of_def (r : α → β → Prop) : set α := { a : α | ∃ b, r a b }
def range (r : α → β → Prop) : set β := { b : β | ∃ (a : α), r a b }
-- EXAMPLE
/-
Let R by the relation between natural numbers
and strings of those lengths. E.g., (5, "hello")
would by in the relation because 5 is the length
of the string, "hello."
-/
def R : ℕ → string → Prop := λ n s, n = s.length
#check dom R
#reduce dom R
#check codom R
#reduce codom R -- what set?
#check dom_of_def R
#reduce dom_of_def R -- a set, right?
#check range R
#reduce range R -- a set, right?
/- RESTRICTION OF A RELATION
It will often be useful to consider the
subrelation obtained by restricting the
domain of a relation to elements of a
set, s.
If a relation relates three cats, c1, c2,
and c3, to their ages, say a1, a2 and a3,
respectively, then restricting the domain
of r to the set, s = {c1, c3}, would give
the relation associating c1 and c3 with
corresponding ages, but there would be no
(c2, a2) pair in the restricted relation
because c2 ∉ s. An analogous definition
gives us the range restriction of r to a
set, s.
-/
/-
Note that these operations take relations and
sets as arguments and "return" new relations
(again represented as two_place predicates).
Of course, these are logical specifications,
not programs, so they don't really compute
anything at all, but they do provide formal
"specifications" of useful programs that can
be implemented. Indeed, the set of relational
concepts in this file is really at the heart
of the relational specification of programs.
-/
def dom_res
(r : α → β → Prop)
(s : set α) :
α → β → Prop :=
λ a b, a ∈ s ∧ r a b
def ran_res
(r : α → β → Prop)
(s : set β) :
α → β → Prop :=
_ -- homework
/-
In a relation in general, an α value can have zero,
one, or more corresponding β values. As a nice example,
consider the binary relation on real numbers defined
by x^2 + y^2 = 1^2. From basic algebra, recall that,
by the pythagorean theorem, this relation comprises
all of the x-y pairs in the unit circle. It's the
set of real number (x,y) pairs for which x^2+y^2=1.
Now where x is zero, as an example, there is not one
but there are two corresponding y values: -1 and 1.
That's fine because a relation is *any* subset of
the set of all α-β pairs. In particular, the "circle"
relation contains both (0,1) and (0,-1). Each pair
satisfies the specification, that x^2+y^2=1. Be sure
you see that this simple algebraic claim is correct.
If we think of "applying" a relation to a value, then,
we have to get back not a single value, in general, but
a set of values that could, in general, be empty, be
a singleton set, or have more than one value. In our
case here where r is the unit circle relation, what
should we expect as the value of (r 0)?
Yes, it's the set { 1, -1 }. We will this result set
the "image" of 0 under r. I guess you can think of r
as being like a bright light shining on 0 from the
left and being blocked from projecting through to the
corresponding β values except for where that 0 is.
What gets illuminated in this case is the set of β
values, { 1, -1 }.
We can then easily extend this concept to the image
of a set of α values.
Note that the folloowing operations take a relation
and a value and return a set of values.
-/
-- image of an "argument" value under r
def image_val (a : α) : set β :=
{ b : β | a ≺ b }
-- image of a set, s, of arguments, under r
def image_set (s : set α) : set β :=
{ b : β | ∃ a : α, a ∈ s ∧ a ≺ b }
/- HOMEWORK
Define the concepts of the *pre-image* of a
value of type β or of a set of such values.
-/
/-
Here's another operation that takes a relation
and returns a relation: namely the same as the
original but with all the pair arrows reversed.
-/
-- inverse of r
def inverse : β → α → Prop :=
λ (b : β) (a : α), r a b
/-
Finally we have this beautiful operation that
takes two relations as arguments and glues them
together into a new end-to-end relation: the
*composition* of s with r. The result of applying
this relation to an (a : α) is the (c : γ) that
is obtained by applying the relation s to the
result of applying the relation r to a. We can
thus call the resulting relation "s after r."
-/
def composition (s : β → γ → Prop) (r : α → β → Prop):=
λ a c, (∃ b, s b c ∧ r a b)
#check @composition
/-
EXTENDED EXAMPLE
-/
/-
Let square be the binary relation that
associates natural numbers with their
squares.
-/
def square := (λ a b : ℕ, b = a * a)
/-
Let incr be the binary relation that
associates natural numbers with their
successors (one more).
-/
def incr := (λ b c : ℕ, c = b + 1)
/-
Let square_after_incr be the composition
of square and incr, namely the composed
function "square after increment" (where
incr is short for increment).
-/
def square_after_incr := composition square incr
/-
Think of square_after_incr as specifying a
function where an argument, a, enters from the
right of incr, moves left through incr, being
increased by 1 in the process, then moves left
again through through square, being squared in
that process. So this relation associates any
natural number with the square of its successor.
-/
#check square -- binary relation on ℕ
#check incr -- binary relation on ℕ
#check square_after_incr -- binary relation on ℕ
#reduce square_after_incr -- λ (a c : ℕ), ∃ (b : ℕ),
-- c = b.mul b ∧ b = a.succ
-- another relation on ℕ
/-
Of course there's no computation actually going
on here. Rather, the composed relation is again
just specified logically.
-/
#reduce square_after_incr
-- λ (a c : ℕ), ∃ (b : ℕ), c = b.mul b ∧ b = a.succ
/-
State and prove the conjecture that (3,16)
is "in" the square_after_incr relation. Then
show that (3,15) is not in this relation.
-/
example : square_after_incr 3 16 :=
begin
unfold square_after_incr square incr composition,
apply exists.intro 4,
split,
repeat { exact rfl },
end
/-
Proof (English).
Unfolding all of the definitions we see we are
to prove ∃ (b : ℕ), 16 = b * b ∧ b = 3 + 1. Let
b = 4, split the conjunction, and prove each side
by simplifying and by the reflexivity of equality.
QED.
-/
example : ¬ square_after_incr 3 15 :=
begin
assume h,
unfold square_after_incr square incr composition at h,
cases h with w pf,
cases pf with sq inc,
rw inc at sq,
cases sq, -- contradiction
end
/-
We'll use proof by negation, assuming that
(3,15) is in square_after_incr and showing
that this leads to a contriction, i.e., by
applying negation introduction.
Expanding all the definitions, we are to show
that ∃ (b : ℕ), 15 = b * b ∧ b = 3 + 1 leads
to a contradiction. By ∃ elimination, we have
a witness w and that 15 = w * w and w = 3 + 1.
Rewriting w in the first equality using the
second, we have 15 = (3 + 1) * (3 + 1). This
assumption is inconsent, as proven by case
analysis on the possible forms of a proof of
such an equality, of which there are none to
consider.
-/
/-
Alternative:
We'll use proof by negation. Assume (3,15)
∈ square_after_incr. Expanding definitions,
we need to show that assuming that
∃ (b : ℕ), 15 = b * b ∧ b = 3 + 1 leads to
a contradiction. Clearly b must be 4 and
that leads to the absurd conclusion that
15 = 16. The original assumption that (3,15)
∈ square_after_incr must have been wrong
thus (3,15) ∉ square_after_incr.
QED.
-/
/-
Proof by negation: What we're asked to show
is that ∃ (b : ℕ), 15 = b * b ∧ b = 3 + 1.
Clearly there is no such b. QED.
-/
|
64a4e6e987385f536a2e8256229027bc0dd04d23 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /examples/lean/group.lean | dbd18ec95b313660877c408e94c02face0910dec | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,389 | lean | import macros
definition associative {A : (Type U)} (f : A → A → A) := ∀ x y z, f (f x y) z = f x (f y z)
definition is_identity {A : (Type U)} (f : A → A → A) (id : A) := ∀ x, f x id = x
definition inverse_ex {A : (Type U)} (f : A → A → A) (id : A) := ∀ x, ∃ y, f x y = id
universe s ≥ 1
definition group := sig A : (Type s), sig mul : A → A → A, sig one : A, (associative mul) # (is_identity mul one) # (inverse_ex mul one)
definition to_group (A : (Type s)) (mul : A → A → A) (one : A) (H1 : associative mul) (H2 : is_identity mul one) (H3 : inverse_ex mul one) : group
:= pair A (pair mul (pair one (pair H1 (pair H2 H3))))
-- The following definitions can be generated automatically.
definition carrier (g : group) := proj1 g
definition G_mul {g : group} : carrier g → carrier g → carrier g
:= proj1 (proj2 g)
infixl 70 * : G_mul
definition one {g : group} : carrier g
:= proj1 (proj2 (proj2 g))
theorem G_assoc {g : group} (x y z : carrier g) : (x * y) * z = x * (y * z)
:= (proj1 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 g)))) x y z
theorem G_id {g : group} (x : carrier g) : x * one = x
:= (proj1 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 g))))) x
theorem G_inv {g : group} (x : carrier g) : ∃ y, x * y = one
:= (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 g))))) x
-- First example: the pairwise product of two groups is a group
definition product (g1 g2 : group) : group
:= let S := carrier g1 # carrier g2,
-- It would be nice to be able to define local notation, and write _*_ instead of f
f := λ x y, pair (proj1 x * proj1 y) (proj2 x * proj2 y),
o := pair one one -- this is actually (pair (@one g1) (@one g2))
in have assoc : associative f,
-- The elaborator failed to infer the type of the pairs.
-- I had to annotate the pairs with their types.
from take x y z : S, -- We don't really need to provide S, but it will make the elaborator to work much harder
-- since * is an overloaded operator, we also have * as notation for Nat::mul in the context.
calc f (f x y) z = (pair ((proj1 x * proj1 y) * proj1 z) ((proj2 x * proj2 y) * proj2 z) : S) : refl (f (f x y) z)
... = (pair (proj1 x * (proj1 y * proj1 z)) ((proj2 x * proj2 y) * proj2 z) : S) : { G_assoc (proj1 x) (proj1 y) (proj1 z) }
... = (pair (proj1 x * (proj1 y * proj1 z)) (proj2 x * (proj2 y * proj2 z)) : S) : { G_assoc (proj2 x) (proj2 y) (proj2 z) }
... = f x (f y z) : refl (f x (f y z)),
have id : is_identity f o,
from take x : S,
calc f x o = (pair (proj1 x * one) (proj2 x * one) : S) : refl (f x o)
... = (pair (proj1 x) (proj2 x * one) : S) : { G_id (proj1 x) }
... = (pair (proj1 x) (proj2 x) : S) : { G_id (proj2 x) }
... = x : pair_proj_eq x,
have inv : inverse_ex f o,
from take x : S,
obtain (y1 : carrier g1) (Hy1 : proj1 x * y1 = one), from G_inv (proj1 x),
obtain (y2 : carrier g2) (Hy2 : proj2 x * y2 = one), from G_inv (proj2 x),
show ∃ y, f x y = o,
from exists_intro (pair y1 y2 : S)
(calc f x (pair y1 y2 : S) = (pair (proj1 x * y1) (proj2 x * y2) : S) : refl (f x (pair y1 y2 : S))
... = (pair one (proj2 x * y2) : S) : { Hy1 }
... = (pair one one : S) : { Hy2 }
... = o : refl o),
to_group S f o assoc id inv
-- It would be nice to be able to write x.first and x.second instead of (proj1 x) and (proj2 x)
-- Remark: * is overloaded since Lean loads Nat.lean by default.
-- The type errors related to * are quite cryptic because of that
-- Use 'star' for creating products
infixr 50 ⋆ : product
-- It would be nice to be able to write (p1 p2 : g1 ⋆ g2 ⋆ g3)
-- check λ (g1 g2 g3 : group) (p1 p2 : carrier (g1 ⋆ g2 ⋆ g3)), p1 * p2 = p2 * p1
theorem group_inhab (g : group) : inhabited (carrier g)
:= inhabited_intro (@one g)
definition inv {g : group} (a : carrier g) : carrier g
:= ε (group_inhab g) (λ x : carrier g, a * x = one)
theorem G_idl {g : group} (x : carrier g) : x * one = x
:= G_id x
theorem G_invl {g : group} (x : carrier g) : x * inv x = one
:= obtain (y : carrier g) (Hy : x * y = one), from G_inv x,
eps_ax (group_inhab g) y Hy
theorem G_inv_aux {g : group} (x : carrier g) : inv x = (inv x * x) * inv x
:= symm (calc (inv x * x) * inv x = inv x * (x * inv x) : G_assoc (inv x) x (inv x)
... = inv x * one : { G_invl x }
... = inv x : G_idl (inv x))
theorem G_invr {g : group} (x : carrier g) : inv x * x = one
:= calc inv x * x = (inv x * x) * one : symm (G_idl (inv x * x))
... = (inv x * x) * (inv x * inv (inv x)) : { symm (G_invl (inv x)) }
... = ((inv x * x) * inv x) * inv (inv x) : symm (G_assoc (inv x * x) (inv x) (inv (inv x)))
... = (inv x * (x * inv x)) * inv (inv x) : { G_assoc (inv x) x (inv x) }
... = (inv x * one) * inv (inv x) : { G_invl x }
... = (inv x) * inv (inv x) : { G_idl (inv x) }
... = one : G_invl (inv x)
theorem G_idr {g : group} (x : carrier g) : one * x = x
:= calc one * x = (x * inv x) * x : { symm (G_invl x) }
... = x * (inv x * x) : G_assoc x (inv x) x
... = x * one : { G_invr x }
... = x : G_idl x
theorem G_inv_inv {g : group} (x : carrier g) : inv (inv x) = x
:= calc inv (inv x) = inv (inv x) * one : symm (G_idl (inv (inv x)))
... = inv (inv x) * (inv x * x) : { symm (G_invr x) }
... = (inv (inv x) * inv x) * x : symm (G_assoc (inv (inv x)) (inv x) x)
... = one * x : { G_invr (inv x) }
... = x : G_idr x
|
85b8e855f827ed3319c017216421792760766afa | 2eab05920d6eeb06665e1a6df77b3157354316ad | /src/data/nat/totient.lean | add12c6e49f98d6d7586559f75ffbc253b82556d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ayush1801/mathlib | 78949b9f789f488148142221606bf15c02b960d2 | ce164e28f262acbb3de6281b3b03660a9f744e3c | refs/heads/master | 1,692,886,907,941 | 1,635,270,866,000 | 1,635,270,866,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,354 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import data.nat.prime
import data.zmod.basic
/-!
# Euler's totient function
This file defines [Euler's totient function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_totient_function)
`nat.totient n` which counts the number of naturals less than `n` that are coprime with `n`.
We prove the divisor sum formula, namely that `n` equals `φ` summed over the divisors of `n`. See
`sum_totient`. We also prove two lemmas to help compute totients, namely `totient_mul` and
`totient_prime_pow`.
-/
open finset
open_locale big_operators
namespace nat
/-- Euler's totient function. This counts the number of naturals strictly less than `n` which are
coprime with `n`. -/
def totient (n : ℕ) : ℕ := ((range n).filter (nat.coprime n)).card
localized "notation `φ` := nat.totient" in nat
@[simp] theorem totient_zero : φ 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem totient_one : φ 1 = 1 :=
by simp [totient]
lemma totient_eq_card_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = ((range n).filter (nat.coprime n)).card := rfl
lemma totient_le (n : ℕ) : φ n ≤ n :=
calc totient n ≤ (range n).card : card_filter_le _ _
... = n : card_range _
lemma totient_pos : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → 0 < φ n
| 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 := by simp [totient]
| (n+2) := λ h, card_pos.2 ⟨1, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_range.2 dec_trivial, coprime_one_right _⟩⟩
open zmod
@[simp] lemma _root_.zmod.card_units_eq_totient (n : ℕ) [fact (0 < n)] :
fintype.card (units (zmod n)) = φ n :=
calc fintype.card (units (zmod n)) = fintype.card {x : zmod n // x.val.coprime n} :
fintype.card_congr zmod.units_equiv_coprime
... = φ n :
begin
apply finset.card_congr (λ (a : {x : zmod n // x.val.coprime n}) _, a.1.val),
{ intro a, simp [(a : zmod n).val_lt, a.prop.symm] {contextual := tt} },
{ intros _ _ _ _ h, rw subtype.ext_iff_val, apply val_injective, exact h, },
{ intros b hb,
rw [finset.mem_filter, finset.mem_range] at hb,
refine ⟨⟨b, _⟩, finset.mem_univ _, _⟩,
{ let u := unit_of_coprime b hb.2.symm,
exact val_coe_unit_coprime u },
{ show zmod.val (b : zmod n) = b,
rw [val_nat_cast, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hb.1], } }
end
lemma totient_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : m.coprime n) : φ (m * n) = φ m * φ n :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0
then by cases nat.mul_eq_zero.1 hmn0 with h h;
simp only [totient_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, h]
else
begin
haveI : fact (0 < (m * n)) := ⟨nat.pos_of_ne_zero hmn0⟩,
haveI : fact (0 < m) := ⟨nat.pos_of_ne_zero $ left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩,
haveI : fact (0 < n) := ⟨nat.pos_of_ne_zero $ right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩,
rw [← zmod.card_units_eq_totient, ← zmod.card_units_eq_totient,
← zmod.card_units_eq_totient, fintype.card_congr
(units.map_equiv (zmod.chinese_remainder h).to_mul_equiv).to_equiv,
fintype.card_congr (@mul_equiv.prod_units (zmod m) (zmod n) _ _).to_equiv,
fintype.card_prod]
end
lemma sum_totient (n : ℕ) : ∑ m in (range n.succ).filter (∣ n), φ m = n :=
if hn0 : n = 0 then by simp [hn0]
else
calc ∑ m in (range n.succ).filter (∣ n), φ m
= ∑ d in (range n.succ).filter (∣ n), ((range (n / d)).filter (λ m, gcd (n / d) m = 1)).card :
eq.symm $ sum_bij (λ d _, n / d)
(λ d hd, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_range.2 $ lt_succ_of_le $ nat.div_le_self _ _,
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_filter.1 hd).2}; simp⟩)
(λ _ _, rfl)
(λ a b ha hb h,
have ha : a * (n / a) = n, from nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_filter.1 ha).2,
have 0 < (n / a), from nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, by simp [*, lt_irrefl] at *),
by rw [← nat.mul_left_inj this, ha, h, nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_filter.1 hb).2])
(λ b hb,
have hb : b < n.succ ∧ b ∣ n, by simpa [-range_succ] using hb,
have hbn : (n / b) ∣ n, from ⟨b, by rw nat.div_mul_cancel hb.2⟩,
have hnb0 : (n / b) ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, ne.symm hn0] using nat.div_mul_cancel hbn,
⟨n / b, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_range.2 $ lt_succ_of_le $ nat.div_le_self _ _, hbn⟩,
by rw [← nat.mul_left_inj (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hnb0),
nat.mul_div_cancel' hb.2, nat.div_mul_cancel hbn]⟩)
... = ∑ d in (range n.succ).filter (∣ n), ((range n).filter (λ m, gcd n m = d)).card :
sum_congr rfl (λ d hd,
have hd : d ∣ n, from (mem_filter.1 hd).2,
have hd0 : 0 < d, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, hn0 (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd $ h ▸ hd)),
card_congr (λ m hm, d * m)
(λ m hm, have hm : m < n / d ∧ gcd (n / d) m = 1, by simpa using hm,
mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_range.2 $ nat.mul_div_cancel' hd ▸
(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).2 hm.1,
by rw [← nat.mul_div_cancel' hd, gcd_mul_left, hm.2, mul_one]⟩)
(λ a b ha hb h, (nat.mul_right_inj hd0).1 h)
(λ b hb, have hb : b < n ∧ gcd n b = d, by simpa using hb,
⟨b / d, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_range.2
((mul_lt_mul_left (show 0 < d, from hb.2 ▸ hb.2.symm ▸ hd0)).1
(by rw [← hb.2, nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_left _ _),
nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_right _ _)]; exact hb.1)),
hb.2 ▸ coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd (hb.2.symm ▸ hd0)⟩,
hb.2 ▸ nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩))
... = ((filter (∣ n) (range n.succ)).bUnion (λ d, (range n).filter (λ m, gcd n m = d))).card :
(card_bUnion (by intros; apply disjoint_filter.2; cc)).symm
... = (range n).card :
congr_arg card (finset.ext (λ m, ⟨by finish,
λ hm, have h : m < n, from mem_range.1 hm,
mem_bUnion.2 ⟨gcd n m, mem_filter.2
⟨mem_range.2 (lt_succ_of_le (le_of_dvd (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) h)
(gcd_dvd_left _ _))), gcd_dvd_left _ _⟩, mem_filter.2 ⟨hm, rfl⟩⟩⟩))
... = n : card_range _
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ (n + 1)` is `p ^ n * (p - 1)` -/
lemma totient_prime_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (hp : p.prime) (n : ℕ) :
φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = p ^ n * (p - 1) :=
calc φ (p ^ (n + 1))
= ((range (p ^ (n + 1))).filter (coprime (p ^ (n + 1)))).card :
totient_eq_card_coprime _
... = (range (p ^ (n + 1)) \ ((range (p ^ n)).image (* p))).card :
congr_arg card begin
rw [sdiff_eq_filter],
apply filter_congr,
simp only [mem_range, mem_filter, coprime_pow_left_iff n.succ_pos,
mem_image, not_exists, hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd],
intros a ha,
split,
{ rintros hap b _ rfl,
exact hap (dvd_mul_left _ _) },
{ rintros h ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw [pow_succ] at ha,
exact h b (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ha (zero_le _)) (mul_comm _ _) }
end
... = _ :
have h1 : set.inj_on (* p) (range (p ^ n)),
from λ x _ y _, (nat.mul_left_inj hp.pos).1,
have h2 : (range (p ^ n)).image (* p) ⊆ range (p ^ (n + 1)),
from λ a, begin
simp only [mem_image, mem_range, exists_imp_distrib],
rintros b h rfl,
rw [pow_succ'],
exact (mul_lt_mul_right hp.pos).2 h
end,
begin
rw [card_sdiff h2, card_image_of_inj_on h1, card_range,
card_range, ← one_mul (p ^ n), pow_succ, ← tsub_mul,
one_mul, mul_comm]
end
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ ` is `p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1)` -/
lemma totient_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.prime) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
φ (p ^ n) = p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1) :=
by rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn) with ⟨m, rfl⟩;
exact totient_prime_pow_succ hp _
lemma totient_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.prime) : φ p = p - 1 :=
by rw [← pow_one p, totient_prime_pow hp]; simp
lemma totient_eq_iff_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : p.totient = p - 1 ↔ p.prime :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, totient_prime⟩,
replace hp : 1 < p,
{ apply lt_of_le_of_ne,
{ rwa succ_le_iff },
{ rintro rfl,
rw [totient_one, tsub_self] at h,
exact one_ne_zero h } },
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, range_eq_Ico, ←Ico_insert_succ_left hp.le, finset.filter_insert,
if_neg (tactic.norm_num.nat_coprime_helper_zero_right p hp), ←nat.card_Ico 1 p] at h,
refine p.prime_of_coprime hp (λ n hn hnz, finset.filter_card_eq h n $ finset.mem_Ico.mpr ⟨_, hn⟩),
rwa [succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero],
end
@[simp] lemma totient_two : φ 2 = 1 :=
(totient_prime prime_two).trans (by norm_num)
end nat
|
07af7fb89872402f2c872df44b6f41f4d5dd3eaf | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Init/Data/ToString/Basic.lean | 97cb28c8f384f3fa935dbdaa4b85682c98db95f5 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,266 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.String.Basic
import Init.Data.UInt.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Repr
import Init.Data.Int.Basic
import Init.Data.Format.Basic
import Init.Control.Id
import Init.Control.Option
open Sum Subtype Nat
open Std
class ToString (α : Type u) where
toString : α → String
export ToString (toString)
-- This instance is needed because `id` is not reducible
instance {α} [ToString α] : ToString (id α) :=
inferInstanceAs (ToString α)
instance {α} [ToString α] : ToString (Id α) :=
inferInstanceAs (ToString α)
instance : ToString String :=
⟨fun s => s⟩
instance : ToString Substring :=
⟨fun s => s.toString⟩
instance : ToString String.Iterator :=
⟨fun it => it.remainingToString⟩
instance : ToString Bool :=
⟨fun b => cond b "true" "false"⟩
instance {p : Prop} : ToString (Decidable p) := ⟨fun h =>
match h with
| Decidable.isTrue _ => "true"
| Decidable.isFalse _ => "false"⟩
protected def List.toString [ToString α] : List α → String
| [] => "[]"
| [x] => "[" ++ toString x ++ "]"
| x::xs => xs.foldl (· ++ ", " ++ toString ·) ("[" ++ toString x) |>.push ']'
instance {α : Type u} [ToString α] : ToString (List α) :=
⟨List.toString⟩
instance : ToString PUnit.{u+1} :=
⟨fun _ => "()"⟩
instance {α : Type u} [ToString α] : ToString (ULift.{v} α) :=
⟨fun v => toString v.1⟩
instance : ToString Unit :=
⟨fun _ => "()"⟩
instance : ToString Nat :=
⟨fun n => Nat.repr n⟩
instance : ToString String.Pos :=
⟨fun p => Nat.repr p.byteIdx⟩
instance : ToString Int where
toString
| Int.ofNat m => toString m
| Int.negSucc m => "-" ++ toString (succ m)
instance : ToString Char :=
⟨fun c => c.toString⟩
instance (n : Nat) : ToString (Fin n) :=
⟨fun f => toString (Fin.val f)⟩
instance : ToString UInt8 :=
⟨fun n => toString n.toNat⟩
instance : ToString UInt16 :=
⟨fun n => toString n.toNat⟩
instance : ToString UInt32 :=
⟨fun n => toString n.toNat⟩
instance : ToString UInt64 :=
⟨fun n => toString n.toNat⟩
instance : ToString USize :=
⟨fun n => toString n.toNat⟩
instance : ToString Format where
toString f := f.pretty
def addParenHeuristic (s : String) : String :=
if "(".isPrefixOf s || "[".isPrefixOf s || "{".isPrefixOf s || "#[".isPrefixOf s then s
else if !s.any Char.isWhitespace then s
else "(" ++ s ++ ")"
instance {α : Type u} [ToString α] : ToString (Option α) := ⟨fun
| none => "none"
| (some a) => "(some " ++ addParenHeuristic (toString a) ++ ")"⟩
instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [ToString α] [ToString β] : ToString (Sum α β) := ⟨fun
| (inl a) => "(inl " ++ addParenHeuristic (toString a) ++ ")"
| (inr b) => "(inr " ++ addParenHeuristic (toString b) ++ ")"⟩
instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [ToString α] [ToString β] : ToString (α × β) := ⟨fun (a, b) =>
"(" ++ toString a ++ ", " ++ toString b ++ ")"⟩
instance {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [ToString α] [∀ x, ToString (β x)] : ToString (Sigma β) := ⟨fun ⟨a, b⟩ =>
"⟨" ++ toString a ++ ", " ++ toString b ++ "⟩"⟩
instance {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} [ToString α] : ToString (Subtype p) := ⟨fun s =>
toString (val s)⟩
def String.toInt? (s : String) : Option Int := do
if s.get 0 = '-' then do
let v ← (s.toSubstring.drop 1).toNat?;
pure <| - Int.ofNat v
else
Int.ofNat <$> s.toNat?
def String.isInt (s : String) : Bool :=
if s.get 0 = '-' then
(s.toSubstring.drop 1).isNat
else
s.isNat
def String.toInt! (s : String) : Int :=
match s.toInt? with
| some v => v
| none => panic "Int expected"
instance [ToString ε] [ToString α] : ToString (Except ε α) where
toString
| Except.error e => "error: " ++ toString e
| Except.ok a => "ok: " ++ toString a
instance [Repr ε] [Repr α] : Repr (Except ε α) where
reprPrec
| Except.error e, prec => Repr.addAppParen ("Except.error " ++ reprArg e) prec
| Except.ok a, prec => Repr.addAppParen ("Except.ok " ++ reprArg a) prec
|
45cd320bd2c6436920640316f4ab37500847325b | ee8cdbabf07f77e7be63a449b8483ce308d37218 | /lean/src/valid/mathd-algebra-15.lean | a3f550343158b8eb90293d692f3a2ba43a772451 | [
"MIT",
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | zeta1999/miniF2F | 6d66c75d1c18152e224d07d5eed57624f731d4b7 | c1ba9629559c5273c92ec226894baa0c1ce27861 | refs/heads/main | 1,681,897,460,642 | 1,620,646,361,000 | 1,620,646,361,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 363 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 OpenAI. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kunhao Zheng
-/
import data.real.basic
example (s : ℕ+ → ℕ+ → ℕ+) (h₀ : ∀ a b, s a b = a ^ (b:ℕ) + b ^ (a:ℕ)) : s 2 6 = 100 :=
begin
rw h₀,
simp,
calc (2:ℕ+) ^ 6 + (6:ℕ+) ^ 2 = 100 : by {exact rfl,},
end
|
afe72c5617411b8019640e3c2766dc2c6d37c2c9 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/tactic/linarith/parsing.lean | f43291cd087eaea2e29a672843c14f3fd1c38c9e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,567 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import tactic.linarith.datatypes
/-!
# Parsing input expressions into linear form
`linarith` computes the linear form of its input expressions,
assuming (without justification) that the type of these expressions
is a commutative semiring.
It identifies atoms up to ring-equivalence: that is, `(y*3)*x` will be identified `3*(x*y)`,
where the monomial `x*y` is the linear atom.
* Variables are represented by natural numbers.
* Monomials are represented by `monom := rb_map ℕ ℕ`.
The monomial `1` is represented by the empty map.
* Linear combinations of monomials are represented by `sum := rb_map monom ℤ`.
All input expressions are converted to `sum`s, preserving the map from expressions to variables.
We then discard the monomial information, mapping each distinct monomial to a natural number.
The resulting `rb_map ℕ ℤ` represents the ring-normalized linear form of the expression.
This is ultimately converted into a `linexp` in the obvious way.
`linear_forms_and_vars` is the main entry point into this file. Everything else is contained.
-/
open native linarith.ineq tactic
namespace linarith
/-! ### Parsing datatypes -/
/-- Variables (represented by natural numbers) map to their power. -/
@[reducible] meta def monom : Type := rb_map ℕ ℕ
/-- `1` is represented by the empty monomial, the product of no variables. -/
meta def monom.one : monom := rb_map.mk _ _
/-- Compare monomials by first comparing their keys and then their powers. -/
@[reducible] meta def monom.lt : monom → monom → Prop :=
λ a b, (a.keys < b.keys) || ((a.keys = b.keys) && (a.values < b.values))
meta instance : has_lt monom := ⟨monom.lt⟩
/-- Linear combinations of monomials are represented by mapping monomials to coefficients. -/
@[reducible] meta def sum : Type := rb_map monom ℤ
/-- `1` is represented as the singleton sum of the monomial `monom.one` with coefficient 1. -/
meta def sum.one : sum := rb_map.of_list [(monom.one, 1)]
/-- `sum.scale_by_monom s m` multiplies every monomial in `s` by `m`. -/
meta def sum.scale_by_monom (s : sum) (m : monom) : sum :=
s.fold mk_rb_map $ λ m' coeff sm, sm.insert (m.add m') coeff
/-- `sum.mul s1 s2` distributes the multiplication of two sums.` -/
meta def sum.mul (s1 s2 : sum) : sum :=
s1.fold mk_rb_map $ λ mn coeff sm, sm.add $ (s2.scale_by_monom mn).scale coeff
/-- The `n`th power of `s : sum` is the `n`-fold product of `s`, with `s.pow 0 = sum.one`. -/
meta def sum.pow (s : sum) : ℕ → sum
| 0 := sum.one
| (k+1) := s.mul (sum.pow k)
/-- `sum_of_monom m` lifts `m` to a sum with coefficient `1`. -/
meta def sum_of_monom (m : monom) : sum :=
mk_rb_map.insert m 1
/-- The unit monomial `one` is represented by the empty rb map. -/
meta def one : monom := mk_rb_map
/-- A scalar `z` is represented by a `sum` with coefficient `z` and monomial `one` -/
meta def scalar (z : ℤ) : sum :=
mk_rb_map.insert one z
/-- A single variable `n` is represented by a sum with coefficient `1` and monomial `n`. -/
meta def var (n : ℕ) : sum :=
mk_rb_map.insert (mk_rb_map.insert n 1) 1
/-! ### Parsing algorithms -/
local notation `exmap` := list (expr × ℕ)
/--
`linear_form_of_atom red map e` is the atomic case for `linear_form_of_expr`.
If `e` appears with index `k` in `map`, it returns the singleton sum `var k`.
Otherwise it updates `map`, adding `e` with index `n`, and returns the singleton sum `var n`.
-/
meta def linear_form_of_atom (red : transparency) (m : exmap) (e : expr) : tactic (exmap × sum) :=
(do (_, k) ← m.find_defeq red e, return (m, var k)) <|>
(let n := m.length + 1 in return ((e, n)::m, var n))
/--
`linear_form_of_expr red map e` computes the linear form of `e`.
`map` is a lookup map from atomic expressions to variable numbers.
If a new atomic expression is encountered, it is added to the map with a new number.
It matches atomic expressions up to reducibility given by `red`.
Because it matches up to definitional equality, this function must be in the `tactic` monad,
and forces some functions that call it into `tactic` as well.
-/
meta def linear_form_of_expr (red : transparency) : exmap → expr → tactic (exmap × sum)
| m e@`(%%e1 * %%e2) :=
do (m', comp1) ← linear_form_of_expr m e1,
(m', comp2) ← linear_form_of_expr m' e2,
return (m', comp1.mul comp2)
| m `(%%e1 + %%e2) :=
do (m', comp1) ← linear_form_of_expr m e1,
(m', comp2) ← linear_form_of_expr m' e2,
return (m', comp1.add comp2)
| m `(%%e1 - %%e2) :=
do (m', comp1) ← linear_form_of_expr m e1,
(m', comp2) ← linear_form_of_expr m' e2,
return (m', comp1.add (comp2.scale (-1)))
| m `(-%%e) := do (m', comp) ← linear_form_of_expr m e, return (m', comp.scale (-1))
| m p@`(@has_pow.pow _ ℕ _ %%e %%n) :=
match n.to_nat with
| some k :=
do (m', comp) ← linear_form_of_expr m e,
return (m', comp.pow k)
| none := linear_form_of_atom red m p
end
| m e :=
match e.to_int with
| some 0 := return ⟨m, mk_rb_map⟩
| some z := return ⟨m, scalar z⟩
| none := linear_form_of_atom red m e
end
/--
`sum_to_lf s map` eliminates the monomial level of the `sum` `s`.
`map` is a lookup map from monomials to variable numbers.
The output `rb_map ℕ ℤ` has the same structure as `sum`,
but each monomial key is replaced with its index according to `map`.
If any new monomials are encountered, they are assigned variable numbers and `map` is updated.
-/
meta def sum_to_lf (s : sum) (m : rb_map monom ℕ) : rb_map monom ℕ × rb_map ℕ ℤ :=
s.fold (m, mk_rb_map) $ λ mn coeff ⟨map, out⟩,
match map.find mn with
| some n := ⟨map, out.insert n coeff⟩
| none := let n := map.size in ⟨map.insert mn n, out.insert n coeff⟩
end
/--
`to_comp red e e_map monom_map` converts an expression of the form `t < 0`, `t ≤ 0`, or `t = 0`
into a `comp` object.
`e_map` maps atomic expressions to indices; `monom_map` maps monomials to indices.
Both of these are updated during processing and returned.
-/
meta def to_comp (red : transparency) (e : expr) (e_map : exmap) (monom_map : rb_map monom ℕ) :
tactic (comp × exmap × rb_map monom ℕ) :=
do (iq, e) ← parse_into_comp_and_expr e,
(m', comp') ← linear_form_of_expr red e_map e,
let ⟨nm, mm'⟩ := sum_to_lf comp' monom_map,
return ⟨⟨iq, mm'.to_list⟩, m', nm⟩
/--
`to_comp_fold red e_map exprs monom_map` folds `to_comp` over `exprs`,
updating `e_map` and `monom_map` as it goes.
-/
meta def to_comp_fold (red : transparency) : exmap → list expr → rb_map monom ℕ →
tactic (list comp × exmap × rb_map monom ℕ)
| m [] mm := return ([], m, mm)
| m (h::t) mm :=
do (c, m', mm') ← to_comp red h m mm,
(l, mp, mm') ← to_comp_fold m' t mm',
return (c::l, mp, mm')
/--
`linear_forms_and_vars red pfs` is the main interface for computing the linear forms of a list
of expressions. Given a list `pfs` of proofs of comparisons, it produces a list `c` of `comps` of
the same length, such that `c[i]` represents the linear form of the type of `pfs[i]`.
It also returns the largest variable index that appears in comparisons in `c`.
-/
meta def linear_forms_and_max_var (red : transparency) (pfs : list expr) :
tactic (list comp × ℕ) :=
do pftps ← pfs.mmap (λ e, infer_type e >>= instantiate_mvars),
(l, _, map) ← to_comp_fold red [] pftps mk_rb_map,
return (l, map.size - 1)
end linarith
|
a24eabf7e765723af5e00ea3fb4481900a1f8bf3 | 29cc89d6158dd3b90acbdbcab4d2c7eb9a7dbf0f | /3.2/32_exercise_sheet.lean | 3548aa1118ca7798ed847db88dc7fe38cb36ec05 | [] | no_license | KjellZijlemaker/Logical_Verification_VU | ced0ba95316a30e3c94ba8eebd58ea004fa6f53b | 4578b93bf1615466996157bb333c84122b201d99 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,966,086,108 | 1,549,187,704,000 | 1,549,187,704,000 | 155,690,284 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,444 | lean | /- Exercise 3.2: Program Semantics — Hoare Logic -/
/- Download `x32_library.lean` from the "Logical Verification" homepage and put it in the same
directory as this exercise sheet. -/
import .x32_library
namespace lecture
/- Background material from the lecture. Do not prove the `sorry`s below. -/
def program.while_inv (I : state → Prop) (c : state → Prop) (p : program) : program :=
program.while c p
open program
variables
{c : state → Prop} {f : state → ℕ} {n : string}
{p p₀ p₁ p₂ : program} {s s₀ s₁ s₂ t u : state}
{P P' P₁ P₂ P₃ Q Q' : state → Prop}
def partial_hoare (P : state → Prop) (p : program) (Q : state → Prop) : Prop :=
∀s t, P s → (p, s) ⟹ t → Q t
notation `{* ` P : 1 ` *} ` p : 1 ` {* ` Q : 1 ` *}` := partial_hoare P p Q
namespace partial_hoare
lemma consequence (h : {* P *} p {* Q *}) (hp : ∀s, P' s → P s) (hq : ∀s, Q s → Q' s) :
{* P' *} p {* Q' *} :=
sorry
lemma consequence_left (P' : state → Prop) (h : {* P *} p {* Q *}) (hp : ∀s, P' s → P s) :
{* P' *} p {* Q *} :=
sorry
lemma consequence_right (Q : state → Prop) (h : {* P *} p {* Q *}) (hq : ∀s, Q s → Q' s) :
{* P *} p {* Q' *} :=
sorry
lemma skip_intro :
{* P *} skip {* P *} :=
sorry
lemma assign_intro (P : state → Prop) :
{* λs, P (s.update n (f s)) *} assign n f {* P *} :=
sorry
lemma seq_intro (h₁ : {* P₁ *} p₁ {* P₂ *}) (h₂ : {* P₂ *} p₂ {* P₃ *}) :
{* P₁ *} seq p₁ p₂ {* P₃ *} :=
sorry
lemma ite_intro (h₁ : {* λs, P s ∧ c s *} p₁ {* Q *}) (h₂ : {* λs, P s ∧ ¬ c s *} p₂ {* Q *}) :
{* P *} ite c p₁ p₂ {* Q *} :=
sorry
lemma while_intro (P : state → Prop) (h₁ : {* λs, P s ∧ c s *} p {* P *}) :
{* P *} while c p {* λs, P s ∧ ¬ c s *} :=
sorry
lemma skip_intro' (h : ∀s, P s → Q s):
{* P *} skip {* Q *} :=
sorry
lemma assign_intro' (h : ∀s, P s → Q (s.update n (f s))):
{* P *} assign n f {* Q *} :=
sorry
lemma seq_intro' (h₂ : {* P₂ *} p₂ {* P₃ *}) (h₁ : {* P₁ *} p₁ {* P₂ *}) :
{* P₁ *} p₁ ;; p₂ {* P₃ *} :=
sorry
lemma while_intro_inv (I : state → Prop)
(h₁ : {* λs, I s ∧ c s *} p {* I *}) (hp : ∀s, P s → I s) (hq : ∀s, ¬ c s → I s → Q s) :
{* P *} while c p {* Q *} :=
sorry
lemma while_inv_intro {I : state → Prop}
(h₁ : {* λs, I s ∧ c s *} p {* I *}) (hq : ∀s, ¬ c s → I s → Q s) :
{* I *} while_inv I c p {* Q *} :=
sorry
lemma while_inv_intro' {I : state → Prop}
(h₁ : {* λs, I s ∧ c s *} p {* I *}) (hp : ∀s, P s → I s) (hq : ∀s, ¬ c s → I s → Q s) :
{* P *} while_inv I c p {* Q *} :=
sorry
end partial_hoare
end lecture
namespace tactic.interactive
open lecture.partial_hoare lecture tactic
meta def is_meta {elab : bool} : expr elab → bool
| (expr.mvar _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
meta def vcg : tactic unit := do
`({* %%P *} %%p {* %%Q *}) ← target
| skip, -- do nothing if the goal is not a Hoare triple
match p with
| `(program.skip) := applyc (if is_meta P then ``skip_intro else ``skip_intro')
| `(program.assign _ _) := applyc (if is_meta P then ``assign_intro else ``assign_intro')
| `(program.ite _ _ _) := do applyc ``ite_intro; vcg
| `(program.seq _ _) := do applyc ``seq_intro'; vcg
| `(program.while_inv _ _ _) :=
do applyc (if is_meta P then ``while_inv_intro else ``while_inv_intro'); vcg
| _ := fail (to_fmt "cannot analyze " ++ to_fmt p)
end
end tactic.interactive
namespace lecture
open program partial_hoare
/- Question 1: Program verification -/
section GAUSS
/- The following WHILE program is intended to compute the Gaussian sum up to `n`, leaving the result
in `r`. -/
def GAUSS : program :=
assign "r" (λs, 0) ;;
while (λs, s "n" ≠ 0)
( assign "r" (λs, s "r" + s "n") ;;
assign "n" (λs, s "n" - 1) )
/- The summation function: -/
def sum_upto : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (n + 1) := n + 1 + sum_upto n
/- 1.1. Prove the correctness of `GAUSS`, using `vcg`. The main challenge is to figure out which
invariant to use for the while loop. The invariant should capture both the work that has been done
already (the intermediate result) and the work that remains to be done. -/
lemma GAUSS_correct (n : ℕ) :
{* λs, s "n" = n *} GAUSS {* λs, s "r" = sum_upto n *} :=
sorry
end GAUSS
section MUL
/- The following WHILE program is intended to compute the product of `n` and `m`, leaving the
result in `r`. -/
def MUL : program :=
assign "r" (λs, 0) ;;
while (λs, s "n" ≠ 0)
( assign "r" (λs, s "r" + s "m") ;;
assign "n" (λs, s "n" - 1) )
/- 1.2 Prove the correctness of `MUL`, using `vcg`.
Hint: If a variable `x` does not change in a program, it might be useful to record this in the
invariant, by adding a conjunct `s "x" = x`. -/
lemma MUL_correct (n m : ℕ) :
{* λs, s "n" = n ∧ s "m" = m *} MUL {* λs, s "r" = n * m *} :=
sorry
end MUL
/- Question 2: Hoare triples for total correctness -/
def total_hoare (P : state → Prop) (p : program) (Q : state → Prop) : Prop :=
∀s, P s → ∃t, (p, s) ⟹ t ∧ Q t
notation `[* ` P : 1 ` *] ` p : 1 ` [* ` Q : 1 ` *]` := total_hoare P p Q
namespace total_hoare
variables {P P' P₁ P₂ P₃ Q Q' : state → Prop} {n : string}
variables {p p₀ p₁ p₂ : program}
variables {c : state → Prop} {f : state → ℕ}
{s s₀ s₁ s₂ t u : state}
/- 2.1. Prove the consequence rule. -/
lemma consequence (h : [* P *] p [* Q *]) (hp : ∀s, P' s → P s) (hq : ∀s, Q s → Q' s) :
[* P' *] p [* Q' *] :=
sorry
/- 2.2. Prove the rule for `skip`. -/
lemma skip_intro :
[* P *] skip [* P *] :=
sorry
/- 2.3. Prove the rule for `assign`. -/
lemma assign_intro (P : state → Prop) :
[* λs, P (s.update n (f s)) *] assign n f [* P *] :=
sorry
/- 2.4. Prove the rule for `seq`. -/
lemma seq_intro (h₁ : [* P₁ *] p₁ [* P₂ *]) (h₂ : [* P₂ *] p₂ [* P₃ *]) :
[* P₁ *] p₁ ;; p₂ [* P₃ *] :=
sorry
/- 2.5. Prove the rule for `ite`. This requires `c s ∨ ¬ c s`. `classical.em (c s)` provides a
proof, even when `c` is not decidable. -/
lemma ite_intro (h₁ : [* λs, P s ∧ c s *] p₁ [* Q *]) (h₂ : [* λs, P s ∧ ¬ c s *] p₂ [* Q *]) :
[* P *] ite c p₁ p₂ [* Q *] :=
sorry
/- 2.6. Try to prove the rule for `while`.
Before we prove our final goal, we introduce an auxiliary proof. This proof requires
well-founded induction. When using `while_intro.aux` as induction hypothesis we recommend
to do it directly after proving that the argument is less than `n`:
have ih : ∃u, (while c p, t) ⟹ u ∧ I u ∧ ¬c u :=
have M < n := ..., -- necessary for Lean to figure out the well-founded induction
while_intro.aux M ...,
Similar to `ite`, this requires `c s ∨ ¬ c s`. `classical.em (c s)` provides a proof. -/
lemma while_intro.aux
(I : state → Prop)
(V : state → ℕ)
(h_inv : ∀n, [* λs, I s ∧ c s ∧ V s = n *] p [* λs, I s ∧ V s < n *]) :
∀n s, V s = n → I s → ∃t, (while c p, s) ⟹ t ∧ I t ∧ ¬ c t
| n s V_eq hs :=
sorry
lemma while_intro
(I : state → Prop) -- invariant in the loop
(V : state → ℕ) -- variant in the loop body (a.k.a. termination measure)
(h_inv : ∀n, [* λs, I s ∧ c s ∧ V s = n *] p [* λs, I s ∧ V s < n *]) :
[* I *] while c p [* λs, I s ∧ ¬ c s *] :=
sorry
end total_hoare
end lecture
|
0c8ea30b0a1c64a433024b7561bff9f0156d77b6 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/deprecated/group_auto.lean | cb4f71fa393255929bc3e89db1a98356fc71c7a9 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,523 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebra.group.type_tags
import Mathlib.algebra.group.units_hom
import Mathlib.algebra.ring.basic
import Mathlib.data.equiv.mul_add
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2 l u v
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Unbundled monoid and group homomorphisms (deprecated)
This file defines typeclasses for unbundled monoid and group homomorphisms. Though these classes are
deprecated, they are still widely used in mathlib, and probably will not go away before Lean 4
because Lean 3 often fails to coerce a bundled homomorphism to a function.
## main definitions
is_monoid_hom (deprecated), is_group_hom (deprecated)
## implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `group_hom` -- the idea is that `monoid_hom` is used.
The constructor for `monoid_hom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `monoid_hom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
## Tags
is_group_hom, is_monoid_hom, monoid_hom
-/
/--
We have lemmas stating that the composition of two morphisms is again a morphism.
Since composition is reducible, type class inference will always succeed in applying these instances.
For example when the goal is just `⊢ is_mul_hom f` the instance `is_mul_hom.comp`
will still succeed, unifying `f` with `f ∘ (λ x, x)`. This causes type class inference to loop.
To avoid this, we do not make these lemmas instances.
-/
/-- Predicate for maps which preserve an addition. -/
class is_add_hom {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [Add α] [Add β] (f : α → β) where
map_add : ∀ (x y : α), f (x + y) = f x + f y
/-- Predicate for maps which preserve a multiplication. -/
class is_mul_hom {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [Mul α] [Mul β] (f : α → β) where
map_mul : ∀ (x y : α), f (x * y) = f x * f y
namespace is_mul_hom
/-- The identity map preserves multiplication. -/
protected instance Mathlib.is_add_hom.id {α : Type u} [Add α] : is_add_hom id :=
is_add_hom.mk fun (_x _x_1 : α) => rfl
/-- The composition of maps which preserve multiplication, also preserves multiplication. -/
-- see Note [no instance on morphisms]
theorem comp {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Mul α] [Mul β] {γ : Type u_1} [Mul γ] (f : α → β)
(g : β → γ) [is_mul_hom f] [hg : is_mul_hom g] : is_mul_hom (g ∘ f) :=
sorry
/-- A product of maps which preserve multiplication,
preserves multiplication when the target is commutative. -/
instance mul {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [semigroup α] [comm_semigroup β] (f : α → β) (g : α → β)
[is_mul_hom f] [is_mul_hom g] : is_mul_hom fun (a : α) => f a * g a :=
sorry
/-- The inverse of a map which preserves multiplication,
preserves multiplication when the target is commutative. -/
instance inv {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [Mul α] [comm_group β] (f : α → β) [is_mul_hom f] :
is_mul_hom fun (a : α) => f a⁻¹ :=
mk fun (a b : α) => Eq.symm (map_mul f a b) ▸ mul_inv (f a) (f b)
end is_mul_hom
/-- Predicate for add_monoid homomorphisms (deprecated -- use the bundled `monoid_hom` version). -/
class is_add_monoid_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β] (f : α → β)
extends is_add_hom f where
map_zero : f 0 = 0
/-- Predicate for monoid homomorphisms (deprecated -- use the bundled `monoid_hom` version). -/
class is_monoid_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) extends is_mul_hom f
where
map_one : f 1 = 1
namespace monoid_hom
/-!
Throughout this section, some `monoid` arguments are specified with `{}` instead of `[]`.
See note [implicit instance arguments].
-/
/-- Interpret a map `f : M → N` as a homomorphism `M →* N`. -/
def Mathlib.add_monoid_hom.of {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [mM : add_monoid M] [mN : add_monoid N]
(f : M → N) [h : is_add_monoid_hom f] : M →+ N :=
add_monoid_hom.mk f (is_add_monoid_hom.map_zero f) sorry
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_monoid_hom.coe_of {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} {mM : add_monoid M}
{mN : add_monoid N} (f : M → N) [is_add_monoid_hom f] : ⇑(add_monoid_hom.of f) = f :=
rfl
protected instance is_monoid_hom {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} {mM : monoid M} {mN : monoid N}
(f : M →* N) : is_monoid_hom ⇑f :=
is_monoid_hom.mk (map_one f)
end monoid_hom
namespace mul_equiv
/-- A multiplicative isomorphism preserves multiplication (deprecated). -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_equiv.is_add_hom {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [add_monoid M]
[add_monoid N] (h : M ≃+ N) : is_add_hom ⇑h :=
is_add_hom.mk (add_equiv.map_add h)
/-- A multiplicative bijection between two monoids is a monoid hom
(deprecated -- use to_monoid_hom). -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_equiv.is_add_monoid_hom {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [add_monoid M]
[add_monoid N] (h : M ≃+ N) : is_add_monoid_hom ⇑h :=
is_add_monoid_hom.mk (add_equiv.map_zero h)
end mul_equiv
namespace is_monoid_hom
/-- A monoid homomorphism preserves multiplication. -/
theorem Mathlib.is_add_monoid_hom.map_add {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β]
(f : α → β) [is_add_monoid_hom f] (x : α) (y : α) : f (x + y) = f x + f y :=
is_add_hom.map_add f x y
end is_monoid_hom
/-- A map to a group preserving multiplication is a monoid homomorphism. -/
theorem is_monoid_hom.of_mul {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [monoid α] [group β] (f : α → β)
[is_mul_hom f] : is_monoid_hom f :=
sorry
namespace is_monoid_hom
/-- The identity map is a monoid homomorphism. -/
protected instance Mathlib.is_add_monoid_hom.id {α : Type u} [add_monoid α] :
is_add_monoid_hom id :=
is_add_monoid_hom.mk rfl
/-- The composite of two monoid homomorphisms is a monoid homomorphism. -/
theorem Mathlib.is_add_monoid_hom.comp {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β]
(f : α → β) [is_add_monoid_hom f] {γ : Type u_1} [add_monoid γ] (g : β → γ)
[is_add_monoid_hom g] : is_add_monoid_hom (g ∘ f) :=
sorry
end is_monoid_hom
namespace is_add_monoid_hom
/-- Left multiplication in a ring is an additive monoid morphism. -/
protected instance is_add_monoid_hom_mul_left {γ : Type u_1} [semiring γ] (x : γ) :
is_add_monoid_hom fun (y : γ) => x * y :=
mk (mul_zero x)
/-- Right multiplication in a ring is an additive monoid morphism. -/
protected instance is_add_monoid_hom_mul_right {γ : Type u_1} [semiring γ] (x : γ) :
is_add_monoid_hom fun (y : γ) => y * x :=
mk (zero_mul x)
end is_add_monoid_hom
/-- Predicate for additive group homomorphism (deprecated -- use bundled `monoid_hom`). -/
class is_add_group_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α → β)
extends is_add_hom f where
/-- Predicate for group homomorphisms (deprecated -- use bundled `monoid_hom`). -/
class is_group_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) extends is_mul_hom f
where
protected instance monoid_hom.is_group_hom {G : Type u_1} {H : Type u_2} {_x : group G} :
∀ {_x_1 : group H} (f : G →* H), is_group_hom ⇑f :=
fun (f : G →* H) => is_group_hom.mk
protected instance mul_equiv.is_group_hom {G : Type u_1} {H : Type u_2} {_x : group G} :
∀ {_x_1 : group H} (h : G ≃* H), is_group_hom ⇑h :=
fun (h : G ≃* H) => is_group_hom.mk
/-- Construct `is_group_hom` from its only hypothesis. The default constructor tries to get
`is_mul_hom` from class instances, and this makes some proofs fail. -/
theorem is_group_hom.mk' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [group α] [group β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ (x y : α), f (x * y) = f x * f y) : is_group_hom f :=
is_group_hom.mk
namespace is_group_hom
/-- A group homomorphism is a monoid homomorphism. -/
protected instance Mathlib.is_add_group_hom.to_is_add_monoid_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
[add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] : is_add_monoid_hom f :=
is_add_monoid_hom.of_add f
/-- A group homomorphism sends 1 to 1. -/
theorem map_one {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f] :
f 1 = 1 :=
is_monoid_hom.map_one f
/-- A group homomorphism sends inverses to inverses. -/
theorem Mathlib.is_add_group_hom.map_neg {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_group α] [add_group β]
(f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] (a : α) : f (-a) = -f a :=
sorry
/-- The identity is a group homomorphism. -/
protected instance id {α : Type u} [group α] : is_group_hom id := mk
/-- The composition of two group homomorphisms is a group homomorphism. -/
theorem comp {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) [is_group_hom f]
{γ : Type u_1} [group γ] (g : β → γ) [is_group_hom g] : is_group_hom (g ∘ f) :=
mk
/-- A group homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial. -/
theorem Mathlib.is_add_group_hom.injective_iff {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_group α] [add_group β]
(f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] : function.injective f ↔ ∀ (a : α), f a = 0 → a = 0 :=
sorry
/-- The product of group homomorphisms is a group homomorphism if the target is commutative. -/
instance Mathlib.is_add_group_hom.add {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [add_group α] [add_comm_group β]
(f : α → β) (g : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] [is_add_group_hom g] :
is_add_group_hom fun (a : α) => f a + g a :=
is_add_group_hom.mk
/-- The inverse of a group homomorphism is a group homomorphism if the target is commutative. -/
instance Mathlib.is_add_group_hom.neg {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [add_group α] [add_comm_group β]
(f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] : is_add_group_hom fun (a : α) => -f a :=
is_add_group_hom.mk
end is_group_hom
namespace ring_hom
/-!
These instances look redundant, because `deprecated.ring` provides `is_ring_hom` for a `→+*`.
Nevertheless these are harmless, and helpful for stripping out dependencies on `deprecated.ring`.
-/
protected instance is_monoid_hom {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [semiring R] [semiring S]
(f : R →+* S) : is_monoid_hom ⇑f :=
is_monoid_hom.mk (map_one f)
protected instance is_add_monoid_hom {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [semiring R] [semiring S]
(f : R →+* S) : is_add_monoid_hom ⇑f :=
is_add_monoid_hom.mk (map_zero f)
protected instance is_add_group_hom {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [ring R] [ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
is_add_group_hom ⇑f :=
is_add_group_hom.mk
end ring_hom
/-- Inversion is a group homomorphism if the group is commutative. -/
instance inv.is_group_hom {α : Type u} [comm_group α] : is_group_hom has_inv.inv := is_group_hom.mk
namespace is_add_group_hom
/-- Additive group homomorphisms commute with subtraction. -/
theorem map_sub {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α → β)
[is_add_group_hom f] (a : α) (b : α) : f (a - b) = f a - f b :=
sorry
end is_add_group_hom
/-- The difference of two additive group homomorphisms is an additive group
homomorphism if the target is commutative. -/
instance is_add_group_hom.sub {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [add_group α] [add_comm_group β]
(f : α → β) (g : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] [is_add_group_hom g] :
is_add_group_hom fun (a : α) => f a - g a :=
sorry
namespace units
/-- The group homomorphism on units induced by a multiplicative morphism. -/
def map' {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [monoid M] [monoid N] (f : M → N) [is_monoid_hom f] :
units M →* units N :=
map (monoid_hom.of f)
@[simp] theorem coe_map' {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [monoid M] [monoid N] (f : M → N)
[is_monoid_hom f] (x : units M) : ↑(coe_fn (map' f) x) = f ↑x :=
rfl
protected instance coe_is_monoid_hom {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] : is_monoid_hom coe :=
monoid_hom.is_monoid_hom (coe_hom M)
end units
namespace is_unit
theorem map' {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [monoid M] [monoid N] (f : M → N) {x : M} (h : is_unit x)
[is_monoid_hom f] : is_unit (f x) :=
map (monoid_hom.of f) h
end is_unit
theorem additive.is_add_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Mul α] [Mul β] (f : α → β) [is_mul_hom f] :
is_add_hom f :=
is_add_hom.mk (is_mul_hom.map_mul f)
theorem multiplicative.is_mul_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Add α] [Add β] (f : α → β)
[is_add_hom f] : is_mul_hom f :=
is_mul_hom.mk (is_add_hom.map_add f)
theorem additive.is_add_monoid_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β)
[is_monoid_hom f] : is_add_monoid_hom f :=
is_add_monoid_hom.mk (is_monoid_hom.map_one f)
theorem multiplicative.is_monoid_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_monoid α] [add_monoid β]
(f : α → β) [is_add_monoid_hom f] : is_monoid_hom f :=
is_monoid_hom.mk (is_add_monoid_hom.map_zero f)
theorem additive.is_add_group_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [group α] [group β] (f : α → β)
[is_group_hom f] : is_add_group_hom f :=
is_add_group_hom.mk
theorem multiplicative.is_group_hom {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [add_group α] [add_group β]
(f : α → β) [is_add_group_hom f] : is_group_hom f :=
is_group_hom.mk
end Mathlib |
538ae12629937dede18a981056956e4cc3fd373a | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/analysis/special_functions/improper_integrals.lean | 89aa5354e61abbae342f1460f4f081899cfaf235 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,292 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import analysis.special_functions.integrals
import measure_theory.group.integration
import measure_theory.integral.exp_decay
import measure_theory.integral.integral_eq_improper
import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.integral
/-!
# Evaluation of specific improper integrals
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file contains some integrability results, and evaluations of integrals, over `ℝ` or over
half-infinite intervals in `ℝ`.
## See also
- `analysis.special_functions.integrals` -- integrals over finite intervals
- `analysis.special_functions.gaussian` -- integral of `exp (-x ^ 2)`
- `analysis.special_functions.japanese_bracket`-- integrability of `(1+‖x‖)^(-r)`.
-/
open real set filter measure_theory interval_integral
open_locale topology
lemma integrable_on_exp_Iic (c : ℝ) : integrable_on exp (Iic c) :=
begin
refine integrable_on_Iic_of_interval_integral_norm_bounded (exp c) c (λ y,
interval_integrable_exp.1) tendsto_id (eventually_of_mem (Iic_mem_at_bot 0) (λ y hy, _)),
simp_rw [(norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le), integral_exp, sub_le_self_iff],
exact (exp_pos _).le,
end
lemma integral_exp_Iic (c : ℝ) : ∫ (x : ℝ) in Iic c, exp x = exp c :=
begin
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (interval_integral_tendsto_integral_Iic _ (integrable_on_exp_Iic _)
tendsto_id) _,
simp_rw [integral_exp, (show 𝓝 (exp c) = 𝓝 (exp c - 0), by rw sub_zero)],
exact tendsto_exp_at_bot.const_sub _,
end
lemma integral_exp_Iic_zero : ∫ (x : ℝ) in Iic 0, exp x = 1 := exp_zero ▸ integral_exp_Iic 0
lemma integral_exp_neg_Ioi (c : ℝ) : ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi c, exp (-x) = exp (-c) :=
by simpa only [integral_comp_neg_Ioi] using integral_exp_Iic (-c)
lemma integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero : ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, exp (-x) = 1 :=
by simpa only [neg_zero, exp_zero] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi 0
/-- If `0 < c`, then `(λ t : ℝ, t ^ a)` is integrable on `(c, ∞)` for all `a < -1`. -/
lemma integrable_on_Ioi_rpow_of_lt {a : ℝ} (ha : a < -1) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) :
integrable_on (λ t : ℝ, t ^ a) (Ioi c) :=
begin
have hd : ∀ (x : ℝ) (hx : x ∈ Ici c), has_deriv_at (λ t, t ^ (a + 1) / (a + 1)) (x ^ a) x,
{ intros x hx,
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow_const (or.inl (hc.trans_le hx).ne')).div_const _,
field_simp [show a + 1 ≠ 0, from ne_of_lt (by linarith), mul_comm] },
have ht : tendsto (λ t, t ^ (a + 1) / (a + 1)) at_top (𝓝 (0/(a+1))),
{ apply tendsto.div_const,
simpa only [neg_neg] using tendsto_rpow_neg_at_top (by linarith : 0 < -(a + 1)) },
exact integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' hd (λ t ht, rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (hc.trans ht).le a) ht
end
lemma integral_Ioi_rpow_of_lt {a : ℝ} (ha : a < -1) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi c, t ^ a = -c ^ (a + 1) / (a + 1) :=
begin
have hd : ∀ (x : ℝ) (hx : x ∈ Ici c), has_deriv_at (λ t, t ^ (a + 1) / (a + 1)) (x ^ a) x,
{ intros x hx,
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow_const (or.inl (hc.trans_le hx).ne')).div_const _,
field_simp [show a + 1 ≠ 0, from ne_of_lt (by linarith), mul_comm] },
have ht : tendsto (λ t, t ^ (a + 1) / (a + 1)) at_top (𝓝 (0/(a+1))),
{ apply tendsto.div_const,
simpa only [neg_neg] using tendsto_rpow_neg_at_top (by linarith : 0 < -(a + 1)) },
convert integral_Ioi_of_has_deriv_at_of_tendsto' hd (integrable_on_Ioi_rpow_of_lt ha hc) ht,
simp only [neg_div, zero_div, zero_sub],
end
lemma integrable_on_Ioi_cpow_of_lt {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < -1) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) :
integrable_on (λ t : ℝ, (t : ℂ) ^ a) (Ioi c) :=
begin
rw [integrable_on, ←integrable_norm_iff, ←integrable_on],
refine (integrable_on_Ioi_rpow_of_lt ha hc).congr_fun (λ x hx, _) measurable_set_Ioi,
{ dsimp only,
rw [complex.norm_eq_abs, complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (hc.trans hx)] },
{ refine continuous_on.ae_strongly_measurable (λ t ht, _) measurable_set_Ioi,
exact (complex.continuous_at_of_real_cpow_const _ _
(or.inr (hc.trans ht).ne')).continuous_within_at }
end
lemma integral_Ioi_cpow_of_lt {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < -1) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi c, (t : ℂ) ^ a = -(c : ℂ) ^ (a + 1) / (a + 1) :=
begin
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (interval_integral_tendsto_integral_Ioi c
(integrable_on_Ioi_cpow_of_lt ha hc) tendsto_id) _,
suffices : tendsto (λ (x : ℝ), ((x : ℂ) ^ (a + 1) - (c : ℂ) ^ (a + 1)) / (a + 1)) at_top
(𝓝 $ -c ^ (a + 1) / (a + 1)),
{ refine this.congr' ((eventually_gt_at_top 0).mp (eventually_of_forall $ λ x hx, _)),
rw [integral_cpow, id.def],
refine or.inr ⟨_, not_mem_uIcc_of_lt hc hx⟩,
apply_fun complex.re,
rw [complex.neg_re, complex.one_re],
exact ha.ne },
simp_rw [←zero_sub, sub_div],
refine (tendsto.div_const _ _).sub_const _,
rw tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
refine (tendsto_rpow_neg_at_top (by linarith : 0 < -(a.re + 1))).congr'
((eventually_gt_at_top 0).mp (eventually_of_forall $ λ x hx, _)),
simp_rw [neg_neg, complex.norm_eq_abs, complex.abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
complex.add_re, complex.one_re],
end
|
97ee7d9962323f353bab424838cfc2126c77ff3f | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/ring_theory/jacobson_ideal.lean | bf0721eee3caf6d611ee4f3d7111d7af61ee3f4c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,807 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Devon Tuma
-/
import ring_theory.ideal_operations
/-!
# Jacobson radical
The Jacobson radical of a ring `R` is defined to be the intersection of all maximal ideals of `R`.
This is similar to how the nilradical is equal to the intersection of all prime ideals of `R`.
We can extend the idea of the nilradical to ideals of `R`,
by letting the radical of an ideal `I` be the intersection of prime ideals containing `I`.
Under this extension, the original nilradical is the radical of the zero ideal `⊥`.
Here we define the Jacobson radical of an ideal `I` in a similar way,
as the intersection of maximal ideals containing `I`.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring, and `I` be an ideal of `R`
* `jacobson I` is the jacobson radical, i.e. the infimum of all maximal ideals containing I.
* `is_local I` is the proposition that the jacobson radical of `I` is itself a maximal ideal
## Main statements
* `mem_jacobson_iff` gives a characterization of members of the jacobson of I
* `is_local_of_is_maximal_radical`: if the radical of I is maximal then so is the jacobson radical
## Tags
Jacobson, Jacobson radical, Local Ideal
-/
universes u v
namespace ideal
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
section jacobson
/-- The Jacobson radical of `I` is the infimum of all maximal ideals containing `I`. -/
def jacobson (I : ideal R) : ideal R :=
Inf {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_maximal J}
lemma le_jacobson {I : ideal R} : I ≤ jacobson I :=
λ x hx, mem_Inf.mpr (λ J hJ, hJ.left hx)
@[simp] lemma jacobson_top : jacobson (⊤ : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 le_jacobson
@[simp] theorem jacobson_eq_top_iff {I : ideal R} : jacobson I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨λ H, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hi, let ⟨M, hm, him⟩ := exists_le_maximal I hi in
lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (show jacobson I ≤ M, from Inf_le ⟨him, hm⟩) $ lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hm.1) H,
λ H, eq_top_iff.2 $ le_Inf $ λ J ⟨hij, hj⟩, H ▸ hij⟩
lemma jacobson_eq_bot {I : ideal R} : jacobson I = ⊥ → I = ⊥ :=
λ h, eq_bot_iff.mpr (h ▸ le_jacobson)
lemma jacobson.is_maximal {I : ideal R} : is_maximal I → is_maximal (jacobson I) :=
λ h, ⟨λ htop, h.left (jacobson_eq_top_iff.1 htop),
λ J hJ, h.right _ (lt_of_le_of_lt le_jacobson hJ)⟩
theorem mem_jacobson_iff {I : ideal R} {x : R} :
x ∈ jacobson I ↔ ∀ y, ∃ z, x * y * z + z - 1 ∈ I :=
⟨λ hx y, classical.by_cases
(assume hxy : I ⊔ span {x * y + 1} = ⊤,
let ⟨p, hpi, q, hq, hpq⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 hxy) in
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hq in
⟨r, by rw [← one_mul r, ← mul_assoc, ← add_mul, mul_one, ← hr, ← hpq, ← neg_sub, add_sub_cancel]; exact I.neg_mem hpi⟩)
(assume hxy : I ⊔ span {x * y + 1} ≠ ⊤,
let ⟨M, hm1, hm2⟩ := exists_le_maximal _ hxy in
suffices x ∉ M, from (this $ mem_Inf.1 hx ⟨le_trans le_sup_left hm2, hm1⟩).elim,
λ hxm, hm1.1 $ (eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ add_sub_cancel' (x * y) 1 ▸ M.sub_mem
(le_trans le_sup_right hm2 $ mem_span_singleton.2 $ dvd_refl _)
(M.mul_mem_right hxm)),
λ hx, mem_Inf.2 $ λ M ⟨him, hm⟩, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hxm,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hm.exists_inv hxm, ⟨z, hz⟩ := hx (-y) in
hm.1 $ (eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ sub_sub_cancel (x * -y * z + z) 1 ▸ M.sub_mem
(by rw [← one_mul z, ← mul_assoc, ← add_mul, mul_one, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm, neg_add_eq_sub, ← neg_sub,
neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, mul_comm x y]; exact M.mul_mem_right hy)
(him hz)⟩
@[mono] lemma jacobson_mono {I J : ideal R} : I ≤ J → I.jacobson ≤ J.jacobson :=
begin
intros h x hx,
erw mem_Inf at ⊢ hx,
exact λ K ⟨hK, hK_max⟩, hx ⟨trans h hK, hK_max⟩
end
end jacobson
section is_local
/-- An ideal `I` is local iff its Jacobson radical is maximal. -/
@[class] def is_local (I : ideal R) : Prop :=
is_maximal (jacobson I)
theorem is_local_of_is_maximal_radical {I : ideal R} (hi : is_maximal (radical I)) : is_local I :=
have radical I = jacobson I,
from le_antisymm (le_Inf $ λ M ⟨him, hm⟩, hm.is_prime.radical_le_iff.2 him)
(Inf_le ⟨le_radical, hi⟩),
show is_maximal (jacobson I), from this ▸ hi
theorem is_local.le_jacobson {I J : ideal R} (hi : is_local I) (hij : I ≤ J) (hj : J ≠ ⊤) : J ≤ jacobson I :=
let ⟨M, hm, hjm⟩ := exists_le_maximal J hj in
le_trans hjm $ le_of_eq $ eq.symm $ hi.eq_of_le hm.1 $ Inf_le ⟨le_trans hij hjm, hm⟩
theorem is_local.mem_jacobson_or_exists_inv {I : ideal R} (hi : is_local I) (x : R) :
x ∈ jacobson I ∨ ∃ y, y * x - 1 ∈ I :=
classical.by_cases
(assume h : I ⊔ span {x} = ⊤,
let ⟨p, hpi, q, hq, hpq⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h) in
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hq in
or.inr ⟨r, by rw [← hpq, mul_comm, ← hr, ← neg_sub, add_sub_cancel]; exact I.neg_mem hpi⟩)
(assume h : I ⊔ span {x} ≠ ⊤,
or.inl $ le_trans le_sup_right (hi.le_jacobson le_sup_left h) $ mem_span_singleton.2 $ dvd_refl x)
end is_local
theorem is_primary_of_is_maximal_radical {I : ideal R} (hi : is_maximal (radical I)) : is_primary I :=
have radical I = jacobson I,
from le_antisymm (le_Inf $ λ M ⟨him, hm⟩, hm.is_prime.radical_le_iff.2 him)
(Inf_le ⟨le_radical, hi⟩),
⟨ne_top_of_lt $ lt_of_le_of_lt le_radical (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hi.1),
λ x y hxy, ((is_local_of_is_maximal_radical hi).mem_jacobson_or_exists_inv y).symm.imp
(λ ⟨z, hz⟩, by rw [← mul_one x, ← sub_sub_cancel (z * y) 1, mul_sub, mul_left_comm]; exact
I.sub_mem (I.mul_mem_left hxy) (I.mul_mem_left hz))
(this ▸ id)⟩
end ideal
|
fad83931f2148fcc6bccb03670a7bfc7664a6295 | 491068d2ad28831e7dade8d6dff871c3e49d9431 | /library/theories/number_theory/primes.lean | 30d005dbc9776a3176215b452629ef40b3250c22 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | davidmueller13/lean | 65a3ed141b4088cd0a268e4de80eb6778b21a0e9 | c626e2e3c6f3771e07c32e82ee5b9e030de5b050 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,278,313,401 | 1,444,021,177,000 | 1,444,021,177,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,174 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
Prime numbers.
-/
import data.nat logic.identities
open bool
namespace nat
open decidable
definition prime [reducible] (p : nat) := p ≥ 2 ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p
definition prime_ext (p : nat) := p ≥ 2 ∧ ∀ m, m ≤ p → m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p
local attribute prime_ext [reducible]
lemma prime_ext_iff_prime (p : nat) : prime_ext p ↔ prime p :=
iff.intro
begin
intro h, cases h with h₁ h₂, constructor, assumption,
intro m d, exact h₂ m (le_of_dvd (lt_of_succ_le (le_of_succ_le h₁)) d) d
end
begin
intro h, cases h with h₁ h₂, constructor, assumption,
intro m l d, exact h₂ m d
end
definition decidable_prime [instance] (p : nat) : decidable (prime p) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ (prime_ext_iff_prime p)
lemma ge_two_of_prime {p : nat} : prime p → p ≥ 2 :=
suppose prime p, obtain h₁ h₂, from this,
h₁
theorem gt_one_of_prime {p : ℕ} (primep : prime p) : p > 1 :=
lt_of_succ_le (ge_two_of_prime primep)
theorem pos_of_prime {p : ℕ} (primep : prime p) : p > 0 :=
lt.trans zero_lt_one (gt_one_of_prime primep)
lemma not_prime_zero : ¬ prime 0 :=
λ h, absurd (ge_two_of_prime h) dec_trivial
lemma not_prime_one : ¬ prime 1 :=
λ h, absurd (ge_two_of_prime h) dec_trivial
lemma prime_two : prime 2 :=
dec_trivial
lemma prime_three : prime 3 :=
dec_trivial
lemma pred_prime_pos {p : nat} : prime p → pred p > 0 :=
suppose prime p,
have p ≥ 2, from ge_two_of_prime this,
show pred p > 0, from lt_of_succ_le (pred_le_pred this)
lemma succ_pred_prime {p : nat} : prime p → succ (pred p) = p :=
assume h, succ_pred_of_pos (pos_of_prime h)
lemma eq_one_or_eq_self_of_prime_of_dvd {p m : nat} : prime p → m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p :=
assume h d, obtain h₁ h₂, from h, h₂ m d
lemma gt_one_of_pos_of_prime_dvd {i p : nat} : prime p → 0 < i → i mod p = 0 → 1 < i :=
assume ipp pos h,
have p ≥ 2, from ge_two_of_prime ipp,
have p ∣ i, from dvd_of_mod_eq_zero h,
have p ≤ i, from le_of_dvd pos this,
lt_of_succ_le (le.trans `2 ≤ p` this)
definition sub_dvd_of_not_prime {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ¬ prime n → {m | m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n} :=
assume h₁ h₂,
have ¬ prime_ext n, from iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff !prime_ext_iff_prime) h₂,
have ¬ n ≥ 2 ∨ ¬ (∀ m, m ≤ n → m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n), from iff.mp !not_and_iff_not_or_not this,
have ¬ (∀ m, m ≤ n → m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n), from or_resolve_right this (not_not_intro h₁),
have ¬ (∀ m, m < succ n → m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n), from
assume h, absurd (λ m hl hd, h m (lt_succ_of_le hl) hd) this,
have {m | m < succ n ∧ ¬(m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n)}, from bsub_not_of_not_ball this,
obtain m hlt (h₃ : ¬(m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n)), from this,
obtain `m ∣ n` (h₅ : ¬ (m = 1 ∨ m = n)), from iff.mp !not_implies_iff_and_not h₃,
have ¬ m = 1 ∧ ¬ m = n, from iff.mp !not_or_iff_not_and_not h₅,
subtype.tag m (and.intro `m ∣ n` this)
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ¬ prime n → ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n :=
assume h₁ h₂, ex_of_sub (sub_dvd_of_not_prime h₁ h₂)
definition sub_dvd_of_not_prime2 {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ¬ prime n → {m | m ∣ n ∧ m ≥ 2 ∧ m < n} :=
assume h₁ h₂,
have n ≠ 0, from assume h, begin subst n, exact absurd h₁ dec_trivial end,
obtain m m_dvd_n m_ne_1 m_ne_n, from sub_dvd_of_not_prime h₁ h₂,
assert m_ne_0 : m ≠ 0, from assume h, begin subst m, exact absurd (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd m_dvd_n) `n ≠ 0` end,
begin
existsi m, split, assumption,
split,
{cases m with m, exact absurd rfl m_ne_0,
cases m with m, exact absurd rfl m_ne_1, exact succ_le_succ (succ_le_succ (zero_le _))},
{have m_le_n : m ≤ n, from le_of_dvd (pos_of_ne_zero `n ≠ 0`) m_dvd_n,
exact lt_of_le_and_ne m_le_n m_ne_n}
end
theorem exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ¬ prime n → ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≥ 2 ∧ m < n :=
assume h₁ h₂, ex_of_sub (sub_dvd_of_not_prime2 h₁ h₂)
definition sub_prime_and_dvd {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → {p | prime p ∧ p ∣ n} :=
nat.strong_rec_on n
(take n,
assume ih : ∀ m, m < n → m ≥ 2 → {p | prime p ∧ p ∣ m},
suppose n ≥ 2,
by_cases
(suppose prime n, subtype.tag n (and.intro this (dvd.refl n)))
(suppose ¬ prime n,
obtain m m_dvd_n m_ge_2 m_lt_n, from sub_dvd_of_not_prime2 `n ≥ 2` this,
obtain p (hp : prime p) (p_dvd_m : p ∣ m), from ih m m_lt_n m_ge_2,
have p ∣ n, from dvd.trans p_dvd_m m_dvd_n,
subtype.tag p (and.intro hp this)))
lemma exists_prime_and_dvd {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ∃ p, prime p ∧ p ∣ n :=
assume h, ex_of_sub (sub_prime_and_dvd h)
open eq.ops
definition infinite_primes (n : nat) : {p | p ≥ n ∧ prime p} :=
let m := fact (n + 1) in
have m ≥ 1, from le_of_lt_succ (succ_lt_succ (fact_pos _)),
have m + 1 ≥ 2, from succ_le_succ this,
obtain p `prime p` `p ∣ m + 1`, from sub_prime_and_dvd this,
have p ≥ 2, from ge_two_of_prime `prime p`,
have p > 0, from lt_of_succ_lt (lt_of_succ_le `p ≥ 2`),
have p ≥ n, from by_contradiction
(suppose ¬ p ≥ n,
have p < n, from lt_of_not_ge this,
have p ≤ n + 1, from le_of_lt (lt.step this),
have p ∣ m, from dvd_fact `p > 0` this,
have p ∣ 1, from dvd_of_dvd_add_right (!add.comm ▸ `p ∣ m + 1`) this,
have p ≤ 1, from le_of_dvd zero_lt_one this,
absurd (le.trans `2 ≤ p` `p ≤ 1`) dec_trivial),
subtype.tag p (and.intro this `prime p`)
lemma ex_infinite_primes (n : nat) : ∃ p, p ≥ n ∧ prime p :=
ex_of_sub (infinite_primes n)
lemma odd_of_prime {p : nat} : prime p → p > 2 → odd p :=
λ pp p_gt_2, by_contradiction (λ hn,
have even p, from even_of_not_odd hn,
obtain k `p = 2*k`, from exists_of_even this,
assert 2 ∣ p, by rewrite [`p = 2*k`]; apply dvd_mul_right,
or.elim (eq_one_or_eq_self_of_prime_of_dvd pp this)
(suppose 2 = 1, absurd this dec_trivial)
(suppose 2 = p, by subst this; exact absurd p_gt_2 !lt.irrefl))
theorem dvd_of_prime_of_not_coprime {p n : ℕ} (primep : prime p) (nc : ¬ coprime p n) : p ∣ n :=
have H : gcd p n = 1 ∨ gcd p n = p, from eq_one_or_eq_self_of_prime_of_dvd primep !gcd_dvd_left,
or_resolve_right H nc ▸ !gcd_dvd_right
theorem coprime_of_prime_of_not_dvd {p n : ℕ} (primep : prime p) (npdvdn : ¬ p ∣ n) :
coprime p n :=
by_contradiction (suppose ¬ coprime p n, npdvdn (dvd_of_prime_of_not_coprime primep this))
theorem not_dvd_of_prime_of_coprime {p n : ℕ} (primep : prime p) (cop : coprime p n) : ¬ p ∣ n :=
suppose p ∣ n,
have p ∣ gcd p n, from dvd_gcd !dvd.refl this,
have p ≤ gcd p n, from le_of_dvd (!gcd_pos_of_pos_left (pos_of_prime primep)) this,
have 2 ≤ 1, from le.trans (ge_two_of_prime primep) (cop ▸ this),
show false, from !not_succ_le_self this
theorem not_coprime_of_prime_dvd {p n : ℕ} (primep : prime p) (pdvdn : p ∣ n) : ¬ coprime p n :=
assume cop, not_dvd_of_prime_of_coprime primep cop pdvdn
theorem dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_mul_left {p m n : ℕ} (primep : prime p)
(Hmn : p ∣ m * n) (Hm : ¬ p ∣ m) :
p ∣ n :=
have coprime p m, from coprime_of_prime_of_not_dvd primep Hm,
show p ∣ n, from dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_left this Hmn
theorem dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_mul_right {p m n : ℕ} (primep : prime p)
(Hmn : p ∣ m * n) (Hn : ¬ p ∣ n) :
p ∣ m :=
dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_mul_left primep (!mul.comm ▸ Hmn) Hn
theorem not_dvd_mul_of_prime {p m n : ℕ} (primep : prime p) (Hm : ¬ p ∣ m) (Hn : ¬ p ∣ n) :
¬ p ∣ m * n :=
assume Hmn, Hm (dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_mul_right primep Hmn Hn)
lemma dvd_or_dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_mul {p m n : nat} : prime p → p ∣ m * n → p ∣ m ∨ p ∣ n :=
λ h₁ h₂, by_cases
(suppose p ∣ m, or.inl this)
(suppose ¬ p ∣ m, or.inr (dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_mul_left h₁ h₂ this))
lemma dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_pow {p m : nat} : ∀ {n}, prime p → p ∣ m^n → p ∣ m
| 0 hp hd :=
assert p = 1, from eq_one_of_dvd_one hd,
have 1 ≥ 2, by rewrite -this; apply ge_two_of_prime hp,
absurd this dec_trivial
| (succ n) hp hd :=
have p ∣ (m^n)*m, by rewrite [pow_succ' at hd]; exact hd,
or.elim (dvd_or_dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_mul hp this)
(suppose p ∣ m^n, dvd_of_prime_of_dvd_pow hp this)
(suppose p ∣ m, this)
lemma coprime_pow_of_prime_of_not_dvd {p m a : nat} : prime p → ¬ p ∣ a → coprime a (p^m) :=
λ h₁ h₂, coprime_pow_right m (coprime_swap (coprime_of_prime_of_not_dvd h₁ h₂))
lemma coprime_primes {p q : nat} : prime p → prime q → p ≠ q → coprime p q :=
λ hp hq hn,
assert gcd p q ∣ p, from !gcd_dvd_left,
or.elim (eq_one_or_eq_self_of_prime_of_dvd hp this)
(suppose gcd p q = 1, this)
(assume h : gcd p q = p,
assert gcd p q ∣ q, from !gcd_dvd_right,
have p ∣ q, by rewrite -h; exact this,
or.elim (eq_one_or_eq_self_of_prime_of_dvd hq this)
(suppose p = 1, by subst p; exact absurd hp not_prime_one)
(suppose p = q, by contradiction))
lemma coprime_pow_primes {p q : nat} (n m : nat) : prime p → prime q → p ≠ q → coprime (p^n) (q^m) :=
λ hp hq hn, coprime_pow_right m (coprime_pow_left n (coprime_primes hp hq hn))
lemma coprime_or_dvd_of_prime {p} (Pp : prime p) (i : nat) : coprime p i ∨ p ∣ i :=
by_cases
(suppose p ∣ i, or.inr this)
(suppose ¬ p ∣ i, or.inl (coprime_of_prime_of_not_dvd Pp this))
lemma eq_one_or_dvd_of_dvd_prime_pow {p : nat} : ∀ {m i : nat}, prime p → i ∣ (p^m) → i = 1 ∨ p ∣ i
| 0 := take i, assume Pp, begin rewrite [pow_zero], intro Pdvd, apply or.inl (eq_one_of_dvd_one Pdvd) end
| (succ m) := take i, assume Pp, or.elim (coprime_or_dvd_of_prime Pp i)
(λ Pcp, begin
rewrite [pow_succ'], intro Pdvd,
apply eq_one_or_dvd_of_dvd_prime_pow Pp,
apply dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_right,
apply coprime_swap Pcp, exact Pdvd
end)
(λ Pdvd, assume P, or.inr Pdvd)
end nat
|
1b81abaf0f450108b554c405ad2317c9a054407d | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/category_theory/adjunction/fully_faithful.lean | dd3b06ba3e2ab9748db1f522074f947961b098cf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,258 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.adjunction.basic
import category_theory.yoneda
open category_theory
namespace category_theory
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open category
open opposite
variables {C : Type u₁} [𝒞 : category.{v₁} C]
variables {D : Type u₂} [𝒟 : category.{v₂} D]
include 𝒞 𝒟
variables {L : C ⥤ D} {R : D ⥤ C} (h : L ⊣ R)
-- Lemma 4.5.13 from [Riehl][riehl2017]
-- Proof in <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0036>
-- or at <https://math.stackexchange.com/a/2727177>
instance unit_is_iso_of_L_fully_faithful [full L] [faithful L] : is_iso (adjunction.unit h) :=
@nat_iso.is_iso_of_is_iso_app _ _ _ _ _ _ (adjunction.unit h) $ λ X,
@yoneda.is_iso _ _ _ _ ((adjunction.unit h).app X)
{ inv := { app := λ Y f, L.preimage ((h.hom_equiv (unop Y) (L.obj X)).symm f) },
inv_hom_id' :=
begin
ext, dsimp,
simp only [adjunction.hom_equiv_counit, preimage_comp, preimage_map, category.assoc],
rw ←h.unit_naturality,
simp,
end,
hom_inv_id' :=
begin
ext, dsimp,
apply L.injectivity,
simp,
end }.
instance counit_is_iso_of_R_fully_faithful [full R] [faithful R] : is_iso (adjunction.counit h) :=
@nat_iso.is_iso_of_is_iso_app _ _ _ _ _ _ (adjunction.counit h) $ λ X,
@is_iso_of_op _ _ _ _ _ $
@coyoneda.is_iso _ _ _ _ ((adjunction.counit h).app X).op
{ inv := { app := λ Y f, R.preimage ((h.hom_equiv (R.obj X) Y) f) },
inv_hom_id' :=
begin
ext, dsimp,
simp only [adjunction.hom_equiv_unit, preimage_comp, preimage_map],
rw ←h.counit_naturality,
simp,
end,
hom_inv_id' :=
begin
ext, dsimp,
apply R.injectivity,
simp,
end }
-- TODO also prove the converses?
-- def L_full_of_unit_is_iso [is_iso (adjunction.unit h)] : full L := sorry
-- def L_faithful_of_unit_is_iso [is_iso (adjunction.unit h)] : faithful L := sorry
-- def R_full_of_counit_is_iso [is_iso (adjunction.counit h)] : full R := sorry
-- def R_faithful_of_counit_is_iso [is_iso (adjunction.counit h)] : faithful R := sorry
-- TODO also do the statements from Riehl 4.5.13 for full and faithful separately?
end category_theory
|
7f75e03cb0b32ddfae0bf10d5cbfe4eebbebeda4 | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /tests/lean/run/simp_univ_metavars.lean | c6b738808ccae358712c37c9ed6bcfa62116e242 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,614 | lean | meta def blast : tactic unit := using_smt $ return ()
structure { u v } Category :=
(Obj : Type u )
(Hom : Obj -> Obj -> Type v)
(identity : Π X : Obj, Hom X X)
(compose : Π ⦃X Y Z : Obj⦄, Hom X Y → Hom Y Z → Hom X Z)
(left_identity : ∀ ⦃X Y : Obj⦄ (f : Hom X Y), compose (identity _) f = f)
structure Functor (C : Category) (D : Category) :=
(onObjects : C^.Obj → D^.Obj)
(onMorphisms : Π ⦃X Y : C^.Obj⦄,
C^.Hom X Y → D^.Hom (onObjects X) (onObjects Y))
structure NaturalTransformation { C D : Category } ( F G : Functor C D ) :=
(components: Π X : C^.Obj, D^.Hom (F^.onObjects X) (G^.onObjects X))
definition IdentityNaturalTransformation { C D : Category } (F : Functor C D) : NaturalTransformation F F :=
{
components := λ X, D^.identity (F^.onObjects X)
}
definition vertical_composition_of_NaturalTransformations
{ C D : Category }
{ F G H : Functor C D }
( α : NaturalTransformation F G )
( β : NaturalTransformation G H ) : NaturalTransformation F H :=
{
components := λ X, D^.compose (α^.components X) (β^.components X)
}
-- We'll want to be able to prove that two natural transformations are equal if they are componentwise equal.
lemma NaturalTransformations_componentwise_equal
{ C D : Category }
{ F G : Functor C D }
( α β : NaturalTransformation F G )
( w : ∀ X : C^.Obj, α^.components X = β^.components X ) : α = β :=
begin
induction α with αc,
induction β with βc,
have hc : αc = βc, from funext w,
by subst hc
end
@[simp]
lemma vertical_composition_of_NaturalTransformations_components
{ C D : Category }
{ F G H : Functor C D }
{ α : NaturalTransformation F G }
{ β : NaturalTransformation G H }
{ X : C^.Obj } :
(vertical_composition_of_NaturalTransformations α β)^.components X = D^.compose (α^.components X) (β^.components X) :=
by blast
@[simp]
lemma IdentityNaturalTransformation_components
{ C D : Category }
{ F : Functor C D }
{ X : C^.Obj } :
(IdentityNaturalTransformation F)^.components X = D^.identity (F^.onObjects X) :=
by blast
definition FunctorCategory ( C D : Category ) : Category :=
{
Obj := Functor C D,
Hom := λ F G, NaturalTransformation F G,
identity := λ F, IdentityNaturalTransformation F,
compose := @vertical_composition_of_NaturalTransformations C D,
left_identity := begin
intros F G f,
apply NaturalTransformations_componentwise_equal,
intros,
simp [ D^.left_identity ]
end
}
|
4191c8b09f0a2aa053084eda8ee8bfdf98586543 | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/topology/algebra/module/strong_topology.lean | 9d2aeab58b238fc0876ddb5551cdbac415443e19 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,441 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import topology.algebra.uniform_convergence
import topology.algebra.module.locally_convex
/-!
# Strong topologies on the space of continuous linear maps
In this file, we define the strong topologies on `E →L[𝕜] F` associated with a family
`𝔖 : set (set E)` to be the topology of uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖` (also called
the topology of `𝔖`-convergence).
The lemma `uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_of_image_bounded` tells us that this is a
vector space topology if the continuous linear image of any element of `𝔖` is bounded (in the sense
of `bornology.is_vonN_bounded`).
We then declare an instance for the case where `𝔖` is exactly the set of all bounded subsets of
`E`, giving us the so-called "topology of uniform convergence on bounded sets" (or "topology of
bounded convergence"), which coincides with the operator norm topology in the case of
`normed_space`s.
Other useful examples include the weak-* topology (when `𝔖` is the set of finite sets or the set
of singletons) and the topology of compact convergence (when `𝔖` is the set of relatively compact
sets).
## Main definitions
* `continuous_linear_map.strong_topology` is the topology mentioned above for an arbitrary `𝔖`.
* `continuous_linear_map.topological_space` is the topology of bounded convergence. This is
declared as an instance.
## Main statements
* `continuous_linear_map.strong_topology.topological_add_group` and
`continuous_linear_map.strong_topology.has_continuous_smul` show that the strong topology
makes `E →L[𝕜] F` a topological vector space, with the assumptions on `𝔖` mentioned above.
* `continuous_linear_map.topological_add_group` and
`continuous_linear_map.has_continuous_smul` register these facts as instances for the special
case of bounded convergence.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
## TODO
* show that these topologies are T₂ and locally convex if the topology on `F` is
* add a type alias for continuous linear maps with the topology of `𝔖`-convergence?
## Tags
uniform convergence, bounded convergence
-/
open_locale topological_space uniform_convergence
namespace continuous_linear_map
section general
variables {𝕜₁ 𝕜₂ : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜₁] [normed_field 𝕜₂] (σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂)
{E E' F F' : Type*} [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜₁ E] [add_comm_group E'] [module ℝ E']
[add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜₂ F] [add_comm_group F'] [module ℝ F']
[topological_space E] [topological_space E'] (F)
/-- Given `E` and `F` two topological vector spaces and `𝔖 : set (set E)`, then
`strong_topology σ F 𝔖` is the "topology of uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`" on
`E →L[𝕜] F`.
If the continuous linear image of any element of `𝔖` is bounded, this makes `E →L[𝕜] F` a
topological vector space. -/
def strong_topology [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) : topological_space (E →SL[σ] F) :=
(@uniform_on_fun.topological_space E F
(topological_add_group.to_uniform_space F) 𝔖).induced coe_fn
/-- The uniform structure associated with `continuous_linear_map.strong_topology`. We make sure
that this has nice definitional properties. -/
def strong_uniformity [uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) : uniform_space (E →SL[σ] F) :=
@uniform_space.replace_topology _ (strong_topology σ F 𝔖)
((uniform_on_fun.uniform_space E F 𝔖).comap coe_fn)
(by rw [strong_topology, uniform_add_group.to_uniform_space_eq]; refl)
@[simp] lemma strong_uniformity_topology_eq [uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) :
(strong_uniformity σ F 𝔖).to_topological_space = strong_topology σ F 𝔖 :=
rfl
lemma strong_uniformity.uniform_embedding_coe_fn [uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) :
@uniform_embedding (E →SL[σ] F) (E →ᵤ[𝔖] F) (strong_uniformity σ F 𝔖)
(uniform_on_fun.uniform_space E F 𝔖) coe_fn :=
begin
letI : uniform_space (E →SL[σ] F) := strong_uniformity σ F 𝔖,
exact ⟨⟨rfl⟩, fun_like.coe_injective⟩
end
lemma strong_topology.embedding_coe_fn [uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) :
@embedding (E →SL[σ] F) (E →ᵤ[𝔖] F) (strong_topology σ F 𝔖)
(uniform_on_fun.topological_space E F 𝔖)
(uniform_on_fun.of_fun 𝔖 ∘ coe_fn) :=
@uniform_embedding.embedding _ _ (_root_.id _) _ _
(strong_uniformity.uniform_embedding_coe_fn _ _ _)
lemma strong_uniformity.uniform_add_group [uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) : @uniform_add_group (E →SL[σ] F) (strong_uniformity σ F 𝔖) _ :=
begin
letI : uniform_space (E →SL[σ] F) := strong_uniformity σ F 𝔖,
rw [strong_uniformity, uniform_space.replace_topology_eq],
let φ : (E →SL[σ] F) →+ E →ᵤ[𝔖] F := ⟨(coe_fn : (E →SL[σ] F) → E →ᵤ F), rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩,
exact uniform_add_group_comap φ
end
lemma strong_topology.topological_add_group [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) : @topological_add_group (E →SL[σ] F) (strong_topology σ F 𝔖) _ :=
begin
letI : uniform_space F := topological_add_group.to_uniform_space F,
haveI : uniform_add_group F := topological_add_comm_group_is_uniform,
letI : uniform_space (E →SL[σ] F) := strong_uniformity σ F 𝔖,
haveI : uniform_add_group (E →SL[σ] F) := strong_uniformity.uniform_add_group σ F 𝔖,
apply_instance
end
lemma strong_topology.t2_space [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F] [t2_space F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) (h𝔖 : ⋃₀ 𝔖 = set.univ) : @t2_space (E →SL[σ] F) (strong_topology σ F 𝔖) :=
begin
letI : uniform_space F := topological_add_group.to_uniform_space F,
haveI : uniform_add_group F := topological_add_comm_group_is_uniform,
letI : topological_space (E →SL[σ] F) := strong_topology σ F 𝔖,
haveI : t2_space (E →ᵤ[𝔖] F) := uniform_on_fun.t2_space_of_covering h𝔖,
exact (strong_topology.embedding_coe_fn σ F 𝔖).t2_space
end
lemma strong_topology.has_continuous_smul [ring_hom_surjective σ] [ring_hom_isometric σ]
[topological_space F] [topological_add_group F] [has_continuous_smul 𝕜₂ F] (𝔖 : set (set E))
(h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖) (h𝔖₃ : ∀ S ∈ 𝔖, bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜₁ S) :
@has_continuous_smul 𝕜₂ (E →SL[σ] F) _ _ (strong_topology σ F 𝔖) :=
begin
letI : uniform_space F := topological_add_group.to_uniform_space F,
haveI : uniform_add_group F := topological_add_comm_group_is_uniform,
letI : topological_space (E →SL[σ] F) := strong_topology σ F 𝔖,
let φ : (E →SL[σ] F) →ₗ[𝕜₂] E →ᵤ[𝔖] F :=
⟨(coe_fn : (E →SL[σ] F) → E → F), λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩,
exact uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_induced_of_image_bounded 𝕜₂ E F (E →SL[σ] F)
h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂ φ ⟨rfl⟩ (λ u s hs, (h𝔖₃ s hs).image u)
end
lemma strong_topology.has_basis_nhds_zero_of_basis [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F]
{ι : Type*} (𝔖 : set (set E)) (h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop}
{b : ι → set F} (h : (𝓝 0 : filter F).has_basis p b) :
(@nhds (E →SL[σ] F) (strong_topology σ F 𝔖) 0).has_basis
(λ Si : set E × ι, Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2)
(λ Si, {f : E →SL[σ] F | ∀ x ∈ Si.1, f x ∈ b Si.2}) :=
begin
letI : uniform_space F := topological_add_group.to_uniform_space F,
haveI : uniform_add_group F := topological_add_comm_group_is_uniform,
rw nhds_induced,
exact (uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds_zero_of_basis 𝔖 h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂ h).comap coe_fn
end
lemma strong_topology.has_basis_nhds_zero [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F]
(𝔖 : set (set E)) (h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖) :
(@nhds (E →SL[σ] F) (strong_topology σ F 𝔖) 0).has_basis
(λ SV : set E × set F, SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ (𝓝 0 : filter F))
(λ SV, {f : E →SL[σ] F | ∀ x ∈ SV.1, f x ∈ SV.2}) :=
strong_topology.has_basis_nhds_zero_of_basis σ F 𝔖 h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂ (𝓝 0).basis_sets
lemma strong_topology.locally_convex_space [topological_space F']
[topological_add_group F'] [has_continuous_const_smul ℝ F'] [locally_convex_space ℝ F']
(𝔖 : set (set E')) (h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖) :
@locally_convex_space ℝ (E' →L[ℝ] F') _ _ _ (strong_topology (ring_hom.id ℝ) F' 𝔖) :=
begin
letI : topological_space (E' →L[ℝ] F') := strong_topology (ring_hom.id ℝ) F' 𝔖,
haveI : topological_add_group (E' →L[ℝ] F') := strong_topology.topological_add_group _ _ _,
refine locally_convex_space.of_basis_zero _ _ _ _
(strong_topology.has_basis_nhds_zero_of_basis _ _ _ h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂
(locally_convex_space.convex_basis_zero ℝ F')) _,
rintros ⟨S, V⟩ ⟨hS, hVmem, hVconvex⟩ f hf g hg a b ha hb hab x hx,
exact hVconvex (hf x hx) (hg x hx) ha hb hab,
end
end general
section bounded_sets
variables {𝕜₁ 𝕜₂ : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜₁] [normed_field 𝕜₂] {σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂} {E E' F F' : Type*}
[add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜₁ E] [add_comm_group E'] [module ℝ E']
[add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜₂ F] [add_comm_group F'] [module ℝ F']
[topological_space E]
/-- The topology of bounded convergence on `E →L[𝕜] F`. This coincides with the topology induced by
the operator norm when `E` and `F` are normed spaces. -/
instance [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F] : topological_space (E →SL[σ] F) :=
strong_topology σ F {S | bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜₁ S}
instance [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F] : topological_add_group (E →SL[σ] F) :=
strong_topology.topological_add_group σ F _
instance [ring_hom_surjective σ] [ring_hom_isometric σ] [topological_space F]
[topological_add_group F] [has_continuous_smul 𝕜₂ F] :
has_continuous_smul 𝕜₂ (E →SL[σ] F) :=
strong_topology.has_continuous_smul σ F {S | bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜₁ S}
⟨∅, bornology.is_vonN_bounded_empty 𝕜₁ E⟩
(directed_on_of_sup_mem $ λ _ _, bornology.is_vonN_bounded.union)
(λ s hs, hs)
instance [uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F] : uniform_space (E →SL[σ] F) :=
strong_uniformity σ F {S | bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜₁ S}
instance [uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F] : uniform_add_group (E →SL[σ] F) :=
strong_uniformity.uniform_add_group σ F _
instance [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F] [has_continuous_smul 𝕜₁ E] [t2_space F] :
t2_space (E →SL[σ] F) :=
strong_topology.t2_space σ F _ (set.eq_univ_of_forall $ λ x,
set.mem_sUnion_of_mem (set.mem_singleton x) (bornology.is_vonN_bounded_singleton x))
protected lemma has_basis_nhds_zero_of_basis [topological_space F]
[topological_add_group F] {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {b : ι → set F}
(h : (𝓝 0 : filter F).has_basis p b) :
(𝓝 (0 : E →SL[σ] F)).has_basis
(λ Si : set E × ι, bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜₁ Si.1 ∧ p Si.2)
(λ Si, {f : E →SL[σ] F | ∀ x ∈ Si.1, f x ∈ b Si.2}) :=
strong_topology.has_basis_nhds_zero_of_basis σ F
{S | bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜₁ S} ⟨∅, bornology.is_vonN_bounded_empty 𝕜₁ E⟩
(directed_on_of_sup_mem $ λ _ _, bornology.is_vonN_bounded.union) h
protected lemma has_basis_nhds_zero [topological_space F]
[topological_add_group F] :
(𝓝 (0 : E →SL[σ] F)).has_basis
(λ SV : set E × set F, bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜₁ SV.1 ∧ SV.2 ∈ (𝓝 0 : filter F))
(λ SV, {f : E →SL[σ] F | ∀ x ∈ SV.1, f x ∈ SV.2}) :=
continuous_linear_map.has_basis_nhds_zero_of_basis (𝓝 0).basis_sets
instance [topological_space E'] [topological_space F'] [topological_add_group F']
[has_continuous_const_smul ℝ F'] [locally_convex_space ℝ F'] :
locally_convex_space ℝ (E' →L[ℝ] F') :=
strong_topology.locally_convex_space _ ⟨∅, bornology.is_vonN_bounded_empty ℝ E'⟩
(directed_on_of_sup_mem $ λ _ _, bornology.is_vonN_bounded.union)
end bounded_sets
end continuous_linear_map
|
87c1c8d2ffa3e44ea0c8a4d71fb3ade71122adf9 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/analysis/normed_space/units.lean | 5120eae715bb4177e52def479ac20cba4f3931ee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,705 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import topology.algebra.ring.ideal
import analysis.specific_limits.normed
/-!
# The group of units of a complete normed ring
This file contains the basic theory for the group of units (invertible elements) of a complete
normed ring (Banach algebras being a notable special case).
## Main results
The constructions `one_sub`, `add` and `unit_of_nearby` state, in varying forms, that perturbations
of a unit are units. The latter two are not stated in their optimal form; more precise versions
would use the spectral radius.
The first main result is `is_open`: the group of units of a complete normed ring is an open subset
of the ring.
The function `inverse` (defined in `algebra.ring`), for a ring `R`, sends `a : R` to `a⁻¹` if `a` is
a unit and 0 if not. The other major results of this file (notably `inverse_add`,
`inverse_add_norm` and `inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order`) cover the asymptotic properties of
`inverse (x + t)` as `t → 0`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale topology
variables {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [complete_space R]
namespace units
/-- In a complete normed ring, a perturbation of `1` by an element `t` of distance less than `1`
from `1` is a unit. Here we construct its `units` structure. -/
@[simps coe]
def one_sub (t : R) (h : ‖t‖ < 1) : Rˣ :=
{ val := 1 - t,
inv := ∑' n : ℕ, t ^ n,
val_inv := mul_neg_geom_series t h,
inv_val := geom_series_mul_neg t h }
/-- In a complete normed ring, a perturbation of a unit `x` by an element `t` of distance less than
`‖x⁻¹‖⁻¹` from `x` is a unit. Here we construct its `units` structure. -/
@[simps coe]
def add (x : Rˣ) (t : R) (h : ‖t‖ < ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖⁻¹) : Rˣ :=
units.copy -- to make `coe_add` true definitionally, for convenience
(x * (units.one_sub (-(↑x⁻¹ * t)) begin
nontriviality R using [zero_lt_one],
have hpos : 0 < ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ := units.norm_pos x⁻¹,
calc ‖-(↑x⁻¹ * t)‖
= ‖↑x⁻¹ * t‖ : by { rw norm_neg }
... ≤ ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ * ‖t‖ : norm_mul_le ↑x⁻¹ _
... < ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ * ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖⁻¹ : by nlinarith only [h, hpos]
... = 1 : mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt hpos)
end))
(x + t) (by simp [mul_add]) _ rfl
/-- In a complete normed ring, an element `y` of distance less than `‖x⁻¹‖⁻¹` from `x` is a unit.
Here we construct its `units` structure. -/
@[simps coe]
def unit_of_nearby (x : Rˣ) (y : R) (h : ‖y - x‖ < ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖⁻¹) : Rˣ :=
units.copy (x.add (y - x : R) h) y (by simp) _ rfl
/-- The group of units of a complete normed ring is an open subset of the ring. -/
protected lemma is_open : is_open {x : R | is_unit x} :=
begin
nontriviality R,
apply metric.is_open_iff.mpr,
rintros x' ⟨x, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖⁻¹, _root_.inv_pos.mpr (units.norm_pos x⁻¹), _⟩,
intros y hy,
rw [metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy,
exact (x.unit_of_nearby y hy).is_unit
end
protected lemma nhds (x : Rˣ) : {x : R | is_unit x} ∈ 𝓝 (x : R) :=
is_open.mem_nhds units.is_open x.is_unit
end units
namespace nonunits
/-- The `nonunits` in a complete normed ring are contained in the complement of the ball of radius
`1` centered at `1 : R`. -/
lemma subset_compl_ball : nonunits R ⊆ (metric.ball (1 : R) 1)ᶜ :=
set.subset_compl_comm.mp $ λ x hx, by simpa [sub_sub_self, units.coe_one_sub] using
(units.one_sub (1 - x) (by rwa [metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, norm_sub_rev] at hx)).is_unit
/- The `nonunits` in a complete normed ring are a closed set -/
protected lemma is_closed : is_closed (nonunits R) := units.is_open.is_closed_compl
end nonunits
namespace normed_ring
open_locale classical big_operators
open asymptotics filter metric finset ring
lemma inverse_one_sub (t : R) (h : ‖t‖ < 1) : inverse (1 - t) = ↑(units.one_sub t h)⁻¹ :=
by rw [← inverse_unit (units.one_sub t h), units.coe_one_sub]
/-- The formula `inverse (x + t) = inverse (1 + x⁻¹ * t) * x⁻¹` holds for `t` sufficiently small. -/
lemma inverse_add (x : Rˣ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝 0), inverse ((x : R) + t) = inverse (1 + ↑x⁻¹ * t) * ↑x⁻¹ :=
begin
nontriviality R,
rw [eventually_iff, metric.mem_nhds_iff],
have hinv : 0 < ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖⁻¹, by cancel_denoms,
use [‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖⁻¹, hinv],
intros t ht,
simp only [mem_ball, dist_zero_right] at ht,
have ht' : ‖-↑x⁻¹ * t‖ < 1,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_mul_le _ _) _,
rw norm_neg,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ht x⁻¹.norm_pos) _,
cancel_denoms },
have hright := inverse_one_sub (-↑x⁻¹ * t) ht',
have hleft := inverse_unit (x.add t ht),
simp only [neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add] at hright,
simp only [units.coe_add] at hleft,
simp [hleft, hright, units.add]
end
lemma inverse_one_sub_nth_order (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝 0), inverse ((1:R) - t) = (∑ i in range n, t ^ i) + (t ^ n) * inverse (1 - t) :=
begin
simp only [eventually_iff, metric.mem_nhds_iff],
use [1, by norm_num],
intros t ht,
simp only [mem_ball, dist_zero_right] at ht,
simp only [inverse_one_sub t ht, set.mem_set_of_eq],
have h : 1 = ((range n).sum (λ i, t ^ i)) * (units.one_sub t ht) + t ^ n,
{ simp only [units.coe_one_sub],
rw [geom_sum_mul_neg],
simp },
rw [← one_mul ↑(units.one_sub t ht)⁻¹, h, add_mul],
congr,
{ rw [mul_assoc, (units.one_sub t ht).mul_inv],
simp },
{ simp only [units.coe_one_sub],
rw [← add_mul, geom_sum_mul_neg],
simp }
end
/-- The formula
`inverse (x + t) = (∑ i in range n, (- x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * x⁻¹ + (- x⁻¹ * t) ^ n * inverse (x + t)`
holds for `t` sufficiently small. -/
lemma inverse_add_nth_order (x : Rˣ) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝 0), inverse ((x : R) + t)
= (∑ i in range n, (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * ↑x⁻¹ + (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ n * inverse (x + t) :=
begin
refine (inverse_add x).mp _,
have hzero : tendsto (λ (t : R), - ↑x⁻¹ * t) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0),
{ convert ((mul_left_continuous (- (↑x⁻¹ : R))).tendsto 0).comp tendsto_id,
simp },
refine (hzero.eventually (inverse_one_sub_nth_order n)).mp (eventually_of_forall _),
simp only [neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add],
intros t h1 h2,
have h := congr_arg (λ (a : R), a * ↑x⁻¹) h1,
dsimp at h,
convert h,
rw [add_mul, mul_assoc],
simp [h2.symm]
end
lemma inverse_one_sub_norm : (λ t : R, inverse (1 - t)) =O[𝓝 0] (λ t, 1 : R → ℝ) :=
begin
simp only [is_O, is_O_with, eventually_iff, metric.mem_nhds_iff],
refine ⟨‖(1:R)‖ + 1, (2:ℝ)⁻¹, by norm_num, _⟩,
intros t ht,
simp only [ball, dist_zero_right, set.mem_set_of_eq] at ht,
have ht' : ‖t‖ < 1,
{ have : (2:ℝ)⁻¹ < 1 := by cancel_denoms,
linarith },
simp only [inverse_one_sub t ht', norm_one, mul_one, set.mem_set_of_eq],
change ‖∑' n : ℕ, t ^ n‖ ≤ _,
have := normed_ring.tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 t ht',
have : (1 - ‖t‖)⁻¹ ≤ 2,
{ rw ← inv_inv (2:ℝ),
refine inv_le_inv_of_le (by norm_num) _,
have : (2:ℝ)⁻¹ + (2:ℝ)⁻¹ = 1 := by ring,
linarith },
linarith
end
/-- The function `λ t, inverse (x + t)` is O(1) as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm (x : Rˣ) : (λ t : R, inverse (↑x + t)) =O[𝓝 0] (λ t, (1:ℝ)) :=
begin
simp only [is_O_iff, norm_one, mul_one],
cases is_O_iff.mp (@inverse_one_sub_norm R _ _) with C hC,
use C * ‖((x⁻¹:Rˣ):R)‖,
have hzero : tendsto (λ t, - (↑x⁻¹ : R) * t) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0),
{ convert ((mul_left_continuous (-↑x⁻¹ : R)).tendsto 0).comp tendsto_id,
simp },
refine (inverse_add x).mp ((hzero.eventually hC).mp (eventually_of_forall _)),
intros t bound iden,
rw iden,
simp at bound,
have hmul := norm_mul_le (inverse (1 + ↑x⁻¹ * t)) ↑x⁻¹,
nlinarith [norm_nonneg (↑x⁻¹ : R)]
end
/-- The function
`λ t, inverse (x + t) - (∑ i in range n, (- x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * x⁻¹`
is `O(t ^ n)` as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order (x : Rˣ) (n : ℕ) :
(λ t : R, inverse (↑x + t) - (∑ i in range n, (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * ↑x⁻¹) =O[𝓝 (0:R)]
(λ t, ‖t‖ ^ n) :=
begin
by_cases h : n = 0,
{ simpa [h] using inverse_add_norm x },
have hn : 0 < n := nat.pos_of_ne_zero h,
simp [is_O_iff],
cases (is_O_iff.mp (inverse_add_norm x)) with C hC,
use C * ‖(1:ℝ)‖ * ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ ^ n,
have h : eventually_eq (𝓝 (0:R))
(λ t, inverse (↑x + t) - (∑ i in range n, (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * ↑x⁻¹)
(λ t, ((- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ n) * inverse (x + t)),
{ refine (inverse_add_nth_order x n).mp (eventually_of_forall _),
intros t ht,
convert congr_arg (λ a, a - (range n).sum (pow (-↑x⁻¹ * t)) * ↑x⁻¹) ht,
simp },
refine h.mp (hC.mp (eventually_of_forall _)),
intros t _ hLHS,
simp only [neg_mul] at hLHS,
rw hLHS,
refine le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _ ) _,
have h' : ‖(-(↑x⁻¹ * t)) ^ n‖ ≤ ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ ^ n * ‖t‖ ^ n,
{ calc ‖(-(↑x⁻¹ * t)) ^ n‖ ≤ ‖(-(↑x⁻¹ * t))‖ ^ n : norm_pow_le' _ hn
... = ‖↑x⁻¹ * t‖ ^ n : by rw norm_neg
... ≤ (‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ * ‖t‖) ^ n : _
... = ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ ^ n * ‖t‖ ^ n : mul_pow _ _ n,
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _) (norm_mul_le ↑x⁻¹ t) n },
have h'' : 0 ≤ ‖(↑x⁻¹ : R)‖ ^ n * ‖t‖ ^ n,
{ refine mul_nonneg _ _;
exact pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) n },
nlinarith [norm_nonneg (inverse (↑x + t))],
end
/-- The function `λ t, inverse (x + t) - x⁻¹` is `O(t)` as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm_diff_first_order (x : Rˣ) :
(λ t : R, inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹) =O[𝓝 0] (λ t, ‖t‖) :=
by simpa using inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order x 1
/-- The function
`λ t, inverse (x + t) - x⁻¹ + x⁻¹ * t * x⁻¹`
is `O(t ^ 2)` as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm_diff_second_order (x : Rˣ) :
(λ t : R, inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹ + ↑x⁻¹ * t * ↑x⁻¹) =O[𝓝 0] (λ t, ‖t‖ ^ 2) :=
begin
convert inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order x 2,
ext t,
simp only [range_succ, range_one, sum_insert, mem_singleton, sum_singleton, not_false_iff,
one_ne_zero, pow_zero, add_mul, pow_one, one_mul, neg_mul,
sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap, sub_neg_eq_add],
end
/-- The function `inverse` is continuous at each unit of `R`. -/
lemma inverse_continuous_at (x : Rˣ) : continuous_at inverse (x : R) :=
begin
have h_is_o : (λ t : R, inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹) =o[𝓝 0] (λ _, 1 : R → ℝ) :=
(inverse_add_norm_diff_first_order x).trans_is_o (is_o.norm_left $ is_o_id_const one_ne_zero),
have h_lim : tendsto (λ (y:R), y - x) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0),
{ refine tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr _,
exact tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mp tendsto_id },
rw [continuous_at, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero, inverse_unit],
simpa [(∘)] using h_is_o.norm_left.tendsto_div_nhds_zero.comp h_lim
end
end normed_ring
namespace units
open mul_opposite filter normed_ring
/-- In a normed ring, the coercion from `Rˣ` (equipped with the induced topology from the
embedding in `R × R`) to `R` is an open map. -/
lemma is_open_map_coe : is_open_map (coe : Rˣ → R) :=
begin
rw is_open_map_iff_nhds_le,
intros x s,
rw [mem_map, mem_nhds_induced],
rintros ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
obtain ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩ :
∃ (u : set R), u ∈ 𝓝 ↑x ∧ ∃ (v : set Rᵐᵒᵖ), v ∈ 𝓝 (op ↑x⁻¹) ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ t,
{ simpa [embed_product, mem_nhds_prod_iff] using ht },
have : u ∩ (op ∘ ring.inverse) ⁻¹' v ∩ (set.range (coe : Rˣ → R)) ∈ 𝓝 ↑x,
{ refine inter_mem (inter_mem hu _) (units.nhds x),
refine (continuous_op.continuous_at.comp (inverse_continuous_at x)).preimage_mem_nhds _,
simpa using hv },
refine mem_of_superset this _,
rintros _ ⟨⟨huy, hvy⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩,
have : embed_product R y ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨huy, by simpa using hvy⟩,
simpa using hts (huvt this)
end
/-- In a normed ring, the coercion from `Rˣ` (equipped with the induced topology from the
embedding in `R × R`) to `R` is an open embedding. -/
lemma open_embedding_coe : open_embedding (coe : Rˣ → R) :=
open_embedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_coe ext is_open_map_coe
end units
namespace ideal
/-- An ideal which contains an element within `1` of `1 : R` is the unit ideal. -/
lemma eq_top_of_norm_lt_one (I : ideal R) {x : R} (hxI : x ∈ I) (hx : ‖1 - x‖ < 1) : I = ⊤ :=
let u := units.one_sub (1 - x) hx in (I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr $
by simpa only [show u.inv * x = 1, by simp] using I.mul_mem_left u.inv hxI)
/-- The `ideal.closure` of a proper ideal in a complete normed ring is proper. -/
lemma closure_ne_top (I : ideal R) (hI : I ≠ ⊤) : I.closure ≠ ⊤ :=
have h : _ := closure_minimal (coe_subset_nonunits hI) nonunits.is_closed,
by simpa only [I.closure.eq_top_iff_one, ne.def] using mt (@h 1) one_not_mem_nonunits
/-- The `ideal.closure` of a maximal ideal in a complete normed ring is the ideal itself. -/
lemma is_maximal.closure_eq {I : ideal R} (hI : I.is_maximal) : I.closure = I :=
(hI.eq_of_le (I.closure_ne_top hI.ne_top) subset_closure).symm
/-- Maximal ideals in complete normed rings are closed. -/
instance is_maximal.is_closed {I : ideal R} [hI : I.is_maximal] : is_closed (I : set R) :=
is_closed_of_closure_subset $ eq.subset $ congr_arg (coe : ideal R → set R) hI.closure_eq
end ideal
|
781452dff158b971a4fc036f1e7a2d54439bb6bd | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /hott/cubical/square.hlean | 96b095b6d919e3dfd0f5b54c7c35e48f01b15159 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,826 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jakob von Raumer
Squares in a type
-/
import types.eq
open eq equiv is_equiv sigma
namespace eq
variables {A B : Type} {a a' a'' a₀₀ a₂₀ a₄₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ a₂₄ a₀₄ a₄₂ a₄₄ a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : A}
/-a₀₀-/ {p₁₀ p₁₀' : a₀₀ = a₂₀} /-a₂₀-/ {p₃₀ : a₂₀ = a₄₀} /-a₄₀-/
{p₀₁ p₀₁' : a₀₀ = a₀₂} /-s₁₁-/ {p₂₁ p₂₁' : a₂₀ = a₂₂} /-s₃₁-/ {p₄₁ : a₄₀ = a₄₂}
/-a₀₂-/ {p₁₂ p₁₂' : a₀₂ = a₂₂} /-a₂₂-/ {p₃₂ : a₂₂ = a₄₂} /-a₄₂-/
{p₀₃ : a₀₂ = a₀₄} /-s₁₃-/ {p₂₃ : a₂₂ = a₂₄} /-s₃₃-/ {p₄₃ : a₄₂ = a₄₄}
/-a₀₄-/ {p₁₄ : a₀₄ = a₂₄} /-a₂₄-/ {p₃₄ : a₂₄ = a₄₄} /-a₄₄-/
inductive square {A : Type} {a₀₀ : A}
: Π{a₂₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ : A}, a₀₀ = a₂₀ → a₀₂ = a₂₂ → a₀₀ = a₀₂ → a₂₀ = a₂₂ → Type :=
ids : square idp idp idp idp
/- square top bottom left right -/
variables {s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁} {s₃₁ : square p₃₀ p₃₂ p₂₁ p₄₁}
{s₁₃ : square p₁₂ p₁₄ p₀₃ p₂₃} {s₃₃ : square p₃₂ p₃₄ p₂₃ p₄₃}
definition ids [reducible] [constructor] := @square.ids
definition idsquare [reducible] [constructor] (a : A) := @square.ids A a
definition hrefl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : square idp idp p p :=
by induction p; exact ids
definition vrefl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : square p p idp idp :=
by induction p; exact ids
definition hrfl [reducible] [unfold 4] {p : a = a'} : square idp idp p p :=
!hrefl
definition vrfl [reducible] [unfold 4] {p : a = a'} : square p p idp idp :=
!vrefl
definition hdeg_square [unfold 6] {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q) : square idp idp p q :=
by induction r;apply hrefl
definition vdeg_square [unfold 6] {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q) : square p q idp idp :=
by induction r;apply vrefl
definition hdeg_square_idp (p : a = a') : hdeg_square (refl p) = hrfl :=
by cases p; reflexivity
definition vdeg_square_idp (p : a = a') : vdeg_square (refl p) = vrfl :=
by cases p; reflexivity
definition hconcat [unfold 16] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (s₃₁ : square p₃₀ p₃₂ p₂₁ p₄₁)
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p₃₀) (p₁₂ ⬝ p₃₂) p₀₁ p₄₁ :=
by induction s₃₁; exact s₁₁
definition vconcat [unfold 16] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (s₁₃ : square p₁₂ p₁₄ p₀₃ p₂₃)
: square p₁₀ p₁₄ (p₀₁ ⬝ p₀₃) (p₂₁ ⬝ p₂₃) :=
by induction s₁₃; exact s₁₁
definition dconcat [unfold 14] {p₀₀ : a₀₀ = a} {p₂₂ : a = a₂₂}
(s₂₁ : square p₀₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₂) (s₁₂ : square p₁₀ p₂₂ p₀₀ p₂₁) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₂; exact s₂₁
definition hinverse [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₁₀⁻¹ p₁₂⁻¹ p₂₁ p₀₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
definition vinverse [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₁₂ p₁₀ p₀₁⁻¹ p₂₁⁻¹ :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
definition eq_vconcat [unfold 11] {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) :
square p p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
definition vconcat_eq [unfold 12] {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₁₂ = p) :
square p₁₀ p p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
definition eq_hconcat [unfold 11] {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) :
square p₁₀ p₁₂ p p₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
definition hconcat_eq [unfold 12] {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁ = p) :
square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
infix ` ⬝h `:75 := hconcat --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝v `:75 := vconcat --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝hp `:75 := hconcat_eq --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝vp `:75 := vconcat_eq --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝ph `:75 := eq_hconcat --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝pv `:75 := eq_vconcat --type using \tr
postfix `⁻¹ʰ`:(max+1) := hinverse --type using \-1h
postfix `⁻¹ᵛ`:(max+1) := vinverse --type using \-1v
definition transpose [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₀₁ p₂₁ p₁₀ p₁₂ :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
definition aps [unfold 12] (f : A → B) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (ap f p₁₀) (ap f p₁₂) (ap f p₀₁) (ap f p₂₁) :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
definition natural_square [unfold 8] {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) (q : a = a') :
square (ap f q) (ap g q) (p a) (p a') :=
eq.rec_on q hrfl
definition natural_square_tr [unfold 8] {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) (q : a = a') :
square (p a) (p a') (ap f q) (ap g q) :=
eq.rec_on q vrfl
/- canceling, whiskering and moving thinks along the sides of the square -/
definition whisker_tl (p : a = a₀₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (p ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ (p ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_br (p : a₂₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ p) p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ p) :=
by induction p;exact s₁₁
definition whisker_rt (p : a = a₂₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ p₂₁) :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_tr (p : a₂₀ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₂₁) :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_bl (p : a = a₀₂) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (p ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_lb (p : a₀₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p) p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition cancel_tl (p : a = a₀₀) (s₁₁ : square (p ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ (p ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite +idp_con at s₁₁; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_br (p : a₂₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ p) p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ p))
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p;exact s₁₁
definition cancel_rt (p : a = a₂₀) (s₁₁ : square (p₁₀ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ p₂₁))
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite idp_con at s₁₁; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_tr (p : a₂₀ = a) (s₁₁ : square (p₁₀ ⬝ p) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₂₁))
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸* at s₁₁,idp_con at s₁₁]; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_bl (p : a = a₀₂) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite idp_con at s₁₁; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_lb (p : a₀₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸* at s₁₁,idp_con at s₁₁]; exact s₁₁
definition move_top_of_left {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₀₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ (p ⬝ q) p₂₁)
: square (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ q p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_top_of_left' {p : a = a₀₀} {q : a = a₀₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ (p⁻¹ ⬝ q) p₂₁)
: square (p ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ q p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p⁻¹; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_left_of_top {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₀} (s : square (p ⬝ q) p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square q p₁₂ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_left_of_top' {p : a = a₀₀} {q : a = a₂₀} (s : square (p⁻¹ ⬝ q) p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square q p₁₂ (p ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p⁻¹; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_bot_of_right {p : a₂₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ q))
: square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ q⁻¹) p₀₁ p :=
by apply cancel_br q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_bot_of_right' {p : a₂₀ = a} {q : a₂₂ = a} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ q⁻¹))
: square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ q) p₀₁ p :=
by apply cancel_br q⁻¹; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_right_of_bot {p : a₀₂ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ q) p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ q⁻¹) :=
by apply cancel_br q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_right_of_bot' {p : a₀₂ = a} {q : a₂₂ = a} (s : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ q⁻¹) p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ q) :=
by apply cancel_br q⁻¹; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_top_of_right {p : a₂₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ q))
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p) p₁₂ p₀₁ q :=
by apply cancel_rt p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_right_of_top {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₀} (s : square (p ⬝ q) p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p p₁₂ p₀₁ (q ⬝ p₂₁) :=
by apply cancel_tr q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_bot_of_left {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₀₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ (p ⬝ q) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (q ⬝ p₁₂) p p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_lb q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_left_of_bot {p : a₀₂ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ q) p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ q (p₀₁ ⬝ p) p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_bl p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
/- some higher ∞-groupoid operations -/
definition vconcat_vrfl (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: s₁₁ ⬝v vrefl p₁₂ = s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; reflexivity
definition hconcat_hrfl (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: s₁₁ ⬝h hrefl p₂₁ = s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; reflexivity
/- equivalences -/
definition eq_of_square [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂ :=
by induction s₁₁; apply idp
definition square_of_eq (r : p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₁₂; esimp at r; induction r; induction p₂₁; induction p₁₀; exact ids
definition eq_top_of_square [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: p₁₀ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂ ⬝ p₂₁⁻¹ :=
by induction s₁₁; apply idp
definition square_of_eq_top (r : p₁₀ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂ ⬝ p₂₁⁻¹) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₂₁; induction p₁₂; esimp at r;induction r;induction p₁₀;exact ids
definition eq_bot_of_square [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: p₁₂ = p₀₁⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; apply idp
definition square_of_eq_bot (r : p₀₁⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₁₂) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₂₁; induction p₁₀; esimp at r; induction r; induction p₀₁; exact ids
definition square_equiv_eq [constructor] (t : a₀₀ = a₀₂) (b : a₂₀ = a₂₂)
(l : a₀₀ = a₂₀) (r : a₀₂ = a₂₂) : square t b l r ≃ t ⬝ r = l ⬝ b :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact eq_of_square},
{ exact square_of_eq},
{ intro s, induction b, esimp [concat] at s, induction s, induction r, induction t, apply idp},
{ intro s, induction s, apply idp},
end
definition hdeg_square_equiv' [constructor] (p q : a = a') : square idp idp p q ≃ p = q :=
by transitivity _;apply square_equiv_eq;transitivity _;apply eq_equiv_eq_symm;
apply equiv_eq_closed_right;apply idp_con
definition vdeg_square_equiv' [constructor] (p q : a = a') : square p q idp idp ≃ p = q :=
by transitivity _;apply square_equiv_eq;apply equiv_eq_closed_right; apply idp_con
definition eq_of_hdeg_square [reducible] {p q : a = a'} (s : square idp idp p q) : p = q :=
to_fun !hdeg_square_equiv' s
definition eq_of_vdeg_square [reducible] {p q : a = a'} (s : square p q idp idp) : p = q :=
to_fun !vdeg_square_equiv' s
definition top_deg_square (l : a₁ = a₂) (b : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₄ = a₃)
: square (l ⬝ b ⬝ r⁻¹) b l r :=
by induction r;induction b;induction l;constructor
definition bot_deg_square (l : a₁ = a₂) (t : a₁ = a₃) (r : a₃ = a₄)
: square t (l⁻¹ ⬝ t ⬝ r) l r :=
by induction r;induction t;induction l;constructor
/-
the following two equivalences have as underlying inverse function the functions
hdeg_square and vdeg_square, respectively.
See example below the definition
-/
definition hdeg_square_equiv [constructor] (p q : a = a') :
square idp idp p q ≃ p = q :=
begin
fapply equiv_change_fun,
{ fapply equiv_change_inv, apply hdeg_square_equiv', exact hdeg_square,
intro s, induction s, induction p, reflexivity},
{ exact eq_of_hdeg_square},
{ reflexivity}
end
definition vdeg_square_equiv [constructor] (p q : a = a') :
square p q idp idp ≃ p = q :=
begin
fapply equiv_change_fun,
{ fapply equiv_change_inv, apply vdeg_square_equiv',exact vdeg_square,
intro s, induction s, induction p, reflexivity},
{ exact eq_of_vdeg_square},
{ reflexivity}
end
example (p q : a = a') : to_inv (hdeg_square_equiv p q) = hdeg_square := idp
/-
characterization of pathovers in a equality type. The type B of the equality is fixed here.
A version where B may also varies over the path p is given in the file squareover
-/
definition eq_pathover [unfold 7] {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = g a} {r : f a' = g a'}
(s : square q r (ap f p) (ap g p)) : q =[p] r :=
by induction p;apply pathover_idp_of_eq;exact eq_of_vdeg_square s
definition eq_pathover_constant_left {g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {b : B} {q : b = g a} {r : b = g a'}
(s : square q r idp (ap g p)) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_constant p b ⬝ph s)
definition eq_pathover_id_left {g : A → A} {p : a = a'} {q : a = g a} {r : a' = g a'}
(s : square q r p (ap g p)) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_id p ⬝ph s)
definition eq_pathover_constant_right {f : A → B} {p : a = a'} {b : B} {q : f a = b} {r : f a' = b}
(s : square q r (ap f p) idp) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (s ⬝hp (ap_constant p b)⁻¹)
definition eq_pathover_id_right {f : A → A} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = a} {r : f a' = a'}
(s : square q r (ap f p) p) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (s ⬝hp (ap_id p)⁻¹)
definition square_of_pathover [unfold 7]
{f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = g a} {r : f a' = g a'}
(s : q =[p] r) : square q r (ap f p) (ap g p) :=
by induction p;apply vdeg_square;exact eq_of_pathover_idp s
definition eq_pathover_constant_left_id_right {p : a = a'} {a₀ : A} {q : a₀ = a} {r : a₀ = a'}
(s : square q r idp p) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_constant p a₀ ⬝ph s ⬝hp (ap_id p)⁻¹)
definition eq_pathover_id_left_constant_right {p : a = a'} {a₀ : A} {q : a = a₀} {r : a' = a₀}
(s : square q r p idp) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_id p ⬝ph s ⬝hp (ap_constant p a₀)⁻¹)
definition loop_pathover {p : a = a'} {q : a = a} {r : a' = a'} (s : square q r p p) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_id p ⬝ph s ⬝hp (ap_id p)⁻¹)
/- interaction of equivalences with operations on squares -/
definition eq_pathover_equiv_square [constructor] {f g : A → B}
(p : a = a') (q : f a = g a) (r : f a' = g a') : q =[p] r ≃ square q r (ap f p) (ap g p) :=
equiv.MK square_of_pathover
eq_pathover
begin
intro s, induction p, esimp [square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],
exact ap vdeg_square (to_right_inv !pathover_idp (eq_of_vdeg_square s))
⬝ to_left_inv !vdeg_square_equiv s
end
begin
intro s, induction p, esimp [square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],
exact ap pathover_idp_of_eq (to_right_inv !vdeg_square_equiv (eq_of_pathover_idp s))
⬝ to_left_inv !pathover_idp s
end
definition square_of_pathover_eq_concato {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q q' : f a = g a}
{r : f a' = g a'} (s' : q = q') (s : q' =[p] r)
: square_of_pathover (s' ⬝po s) = s' ⬝pv square_of_pathover s :=
by induction s;induction s';reflexivity
definition square_of_pathover_concato_eq {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = g a}
{r r' : f a' = g a'} (s' : r = r') (s : q =[p] r)
: square_of_pathover (s ⬝op s') = square_of_pathover s ⬝vp s' :=
by induction s;induction s';reflexivity
definition square_of_pathover_concato {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {p' : a' = a''} {q : f a = g a}
{q' : f a' = g a'} {q'' : f a'' = g a''} (s : q =[p] q') (s' : q' =[p'] q'')
: square_of_pathover (s ⬝o s')
= ap_con f p p' ⬝ph (square_of_pathover s ⬝v square_of_pathover s') ⬝hp (ap_con g p p')⁻¹ :=
by induction s';induction s;esimp [ap_con,hconcat_eq];exact !vconcat_vrfl⁻¹
definition eq_of_square_hrfl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : eq_of_square hrfl = idp_con p :=
by induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_vrfl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : eq_of_square vrfl = (idp_con p)⁻¹ :=
by induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_hdeg_square {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q)
: eq_of_square (hdeg_square r) = !idp_con ⬝ r⁻¹ :=
by induction r;induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_vdeg_square {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q)
: eq_of_square (vdeg_square r) = r ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹ :=
by induction r;induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_eq_vconcat {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: eq_of_square (r ⬝pv s₁₁) = whisker_right r p₂₁ ⬝ eq_of_square s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;cases r;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_eq_hconcat {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: eq_of_square (r ⬝ph s₁₁) = eq_of_square s₁₁ ⬝ (whisker_right r p₁₂)⁻¹ :=
by induction r;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_vconcat_eq {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₁₂ = p)
: eq_of_square (s₁₁ ⬝vp r) = eq_of_square s₁₁ ⬝ whisker_left p₀₁ r :=
by induction r;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_hconcat_eq {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁ = p)
: eq_of_square (s₁₁ ⬝hp r) = (whisker_left p₁₀ r)⁻¹ ⬝ eq_of_square s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; induction r;reflexivity
-- definition vconcat_eq [unfold 11] {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₁₂ = p) :
-- square p₁₀ p p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
-- by induction r; exact s₁₁
-- definition eq_hconcat [unfold 11] {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁)
-- (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p p₂₁ :=
-- by induction r; exact s₁₁
-- definition hconcat_eq [unfold 11] {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂}
-- (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁ = p) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p :=
-- by induction r; exact s₁₁
-- the following definition is very slow, maybe it's interesting to see why?
-- definition eq_pathover_equiv_square' {f g : A → B}(p : a = a') (q : f a = g a) (r : f a' = g a')
-- : square q r (ap f p) (ap g p) ≃ q =[p] r :=
-- equiv.MK eq_pathover
-- square_of_pathover
-- (λs, begin
-- induction p, rewrite [↑[square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],
-- to_right_inv !vdeg_square_equiv (eq_of_pathover_idp s),
-- to_left_inv !pathover_idp s]
-- end)
-- (λs, begin
-- induction p, rewrite [↑[square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],▸*,
-- to_right_inv !(@pathover_idp A) (eq_of_vdeg_square s),
-- to_left_inv !vdeg_square_equiv s]
-- end)
/- recursors for squares where some sides are reflexivity -/
definition rec_on_b [recursor] {a₀₀ : A}
{P : Π{a₂₀ a₁₂ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₀} {l : a₀₀ = a₁₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₁₂}, square t idp l r → Type}
{a₂₀ a₁₂ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₀} {l : a₀₀ = a₁₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₁₂}
(s : square t idp l r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)),
from eq.rec_on (eq_of_square s : t ⬝ r = l) (by induction r; induction t; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ H2
definition rec_on_r [recursor] {a₀₀ : A}
{P : Π{a₀₂ a₂₁ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₁} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₁} {l : a₀₀ = a₀₂}, square t b l idp → Type}
{a₀₂ a₂₁ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₁} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₁} {l : a₀₀ = a₀₂}
(s : square t b l idp) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : l ⬝ b = t := (eq_of_square s)⁻¹ in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)⁻¹⁻¹),
from @eq.rec_on _ _ (λx p, P (square_of_eq p⁻¹)) _ p (by induction b; induction l; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ !inv_inv ▸ H2
definition rec_on_l [recursor] {a₀₁ : A}
{P : Π {a₂₀ a₂₂ : A} {t : a₀₁ = a₂₀} {b : a₀₁ = a₂₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₂₂},
square t b idp r → Type}
{a₂₀ a₂₂ : A} {t : a₀₁ = a₂₀} {b : a₀₁ = a₂₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₂₂}
(s : square t b idp r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : t ⬝ r = b := eq_of_square s ⬝ !idp_con in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (p ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹)),
from eq.rec_on p (by induction r; induction t; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ !con_inv_cancel_right ▸ H2
definition rec_on_t [recursor] {a₁₀ : A}
{P : Π {a₀₂ a₂₂ : A} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₂} {l : a₁₀ = a₀₂} {r : a₁₀ = a₂₂}, square idp b l r → Type}
{a₀₂ a₂₂ : A} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₂} {l : a₁₀ = a₀₂} {r : a₁₀ = a₂₂}
(s : square idp b l r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : l ⬝ b = r := (eq_of_square s)⁻¹ ⬝ !idp_con in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq ((p ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹)⁻¹)),
from eq.rec_on p (by induction b; induction l; exact H),
have H3 : P (square_of_eq ((eq_of_square s)⁻¹⁻¹)),
from eq.rec_on !con_inv_cancel_right H2,
have H4 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)),
from eq.rec_on !inv_inv H3,
proof
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ H4
qed
definition rec_on_tb [recursor] {a : A}
{P : Π{b : A} {l : a = b} {r : a = b}, square idp idp l r → Type}
{b : A} {l : a = b} {r : a = b}
(s : square idp idp l r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)),
from eq.rec_on (eq_of_square s : idp ⬝ r = l) (by induction r; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ H2
definition rec_on_lr [recursor] {a : A}
{P : Π{a' : A} {t : a = a'} {b : a = a'}, square t b idp idp → Type}
{a' : A} {t : a = a'} {b : a = a'}
(s : square t b idp idp) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : idp ⬝ b = t := (eq_of_square s)⁻¹ in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)⁻¹⁻¹),
from @eq.rec_on _ _ (λx q, P (square_of_eq q⁻¹)) _ p (by induction b; exact H),
to_left_inv (!square_equiv_eq) s ▸ !inv_inv ▸ H2
--we can also do the other recursors (tl, tr, bl, br, tbl, tbr, tlr, blr), but let's postpone this until they are needed
definition whisker_square [unfold 14 15 16 17] (r₁₀ : p₁₀ = p₁₀') (r₁₂ : p₁₂ = p₁₂')
(r₀₁ : p₀₁ = p₀₁') (r₂₁ : p₂₁ = p₂₁') (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀' p₁₂' p₀₁' p₂₁' :=
by induction r₁₀; induction r₁₂; induction r₀₁; induction r₂₁; exact s
/- squares commute with some operations on 2-paths -/
definition square_inv2 {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : a = a'}
{t : p₁ = p₂} {b : p₃ = p₄} {l : p₁ = p₃} {r : p₂ = p₄} (s : square t b l r)
: square (inverse2 t) (inverse2 b) (inverse2 l) (inverse2 r) :=
by induction s;constructor
definition square_con2 {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : a₁ = a₂} {q₁ q₂ q₃ q₄ : a₂ = a₃}
{t₁ : p₁ = p₂} {b₁ : p₃ = p₄} {l₁ : p₁ = p₃} {r₁ : p₂ = p₄}
{t₂ : q₁ = q₂} {b₂ : q₃ = q₄} {l₂ : q₁ = q₃} {r₂ : q₂ = q₄}
(s₁ : square t₁ b₁ l₁ r₁) (s₂ : square t₂ b₂ l₂ r₂)
: square (t₁ ◾ t₂) (b₁ ◾ b₂) (l₁ ◾ l₂) (r₁ ◾ r₂) :=
by induction s₂;induction s₁;constructor
open is_trunc
definition is_set.elims [H : is_set A] : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
square_of_eq !is_set.elim
definition is_trunc_square [instance] (n : trunc_index) [H : is_trunc n .+2 A]
: is_trunc n (square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) :=
is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev n !square_equiv_eq
-- definition square_of_con_inv_hsquare {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : a₁ = a₂}
-- {t : p₁ = p₂} {b : p₃ = p₄} {l : p₁ = p₃} {r : p₂ = p₄}
-- (s : square (con_inv_eq_idp t) (con_inv_eq_idp b) (l ◾ r⁻²) idp)
-- : square t b l r :=
-- sorry --by induction s
/- Square fillers -/
-- TODO replace by "more algebraic" fillers?
variables (p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
definition square_fill_t : Σ (p : a₀₀ = a₂₀), square p p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₀₁; induction p₂₁; exact ⟨_, !vrefl⟩
definition square_fill_b : Σ (p : a₀₂ = a₂₂), square p₁₀ p p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₀₁; induction p₂₁; exact ⟨_, !vrefl⟩
definition square_fill_l : Σ (p : a₀₀ = a₀₂), square p₁₀ p₁₂ p p₂₁ :=
by induction p₁₀; induction p₁₂; exact ⟨_, !hrefl⟩
definition square_fill_r : Σ (p : a₂₀ = a₂₂) , square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p :=
by induction p₁₀; induction p₁₂; exact ⟨_, !hrefl⟩
/- Squares having an 'ap' term on one face -/
--TODO find better names
definition square_Flr_ap_idp {c : B} {f : A → B} (p : Π a, f a = c)
{a b : A} (q : a = b) : square (p a) (p b) (ap f q) idp :=
by induction q; apply vrfl
definition square_Flr_idp_ap {c : B} {f : A → B} (p : Π a, c = f a)
{a b : A} (q : a = b) : square (p a) (p b) idp (ap f q) :=
by induction q; apply vrfl
definition square_ap_idp_Flr {b : B} {f : A → B} (p : Π a, f a = b)
{a b : A} (q : a = b) : square (ap f q) idp (p a) (p b) :=
by induction q; apply hrfl
/- Matching eq_hconcat with hconcat etc. -/
-- TODO maybe rename hconcat_eq and the like?
variable (s₁₁)
definition ph_eq_pv_h_vp {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) :
r ⬝ph s₁₁ = !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝pv ((hdeg_square r) ⬝h s₁₁) ⬝vp !idp_con :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition hdeg_h_eq_pv_ph_vp {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) :
hdeg_square r ⬝h s₁₁ = !idp_con ⬝pv (r ⬝ph s₁₁) ⬝vp !idp_con⁻¹ :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition hp_eq_h {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (r : p₂₁ = p) :
s₁₁ ⬝hp r = s₁₁ ⬝h hdeg_square r :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition pv_eq_ph_vdeg_v_vh {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) :
r ⬝pv s₁₁ = !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ph ((vdeg_square r) ⬝v s₁₁) ⬝hp !idp_con :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition vdeg_v_eq_ph_pv_hp {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) :
vdeg_square r ⬝v s₁₁ = !idp_con ⬝ph (r ⬝pv s₁₁) ⬝hp !idp_con⁻¹ :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition vp_eq_v {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (r : p₁₂ = p) :
s₁₁ ⬝vp r = s₁₁ ⬝v vdeg_square r :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition natural_square011 {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type}
{a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} (q : b =[p] b')
{l r : Π⦃a⦄, B a → A'} (g : Π⦃a⦄ (b : B a), l b = r b)
: square (apd011 l p q) (apd011 r p q) (g b) (g b') :=
begin
induction q, exact hrfl
end
definition natural_square0111' {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type} (C : Π⦃a⦄, B a → Type)
{a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} {q : b =[p] b'}
{c : C b} {c' : C b'} (s : c =[apd011 C p q] c')
{l r : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a}, C b → A'}
(g : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a} (c : C b), l c = r c)
: square (apd0111 l p q s) (apd0111 r p q s) (g c) (g c') :=
begin
induction q, esimp at s, induction s using idp_rec_on, exact hrfl
end
-- this can be generalized a bit, by making the domain and codomain of k different, and also have
-- a function at the RHS of s (similar to m)
definition natural_square0111 {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type} (C : Π⦃a⦄, B a → Type)
{a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} {q : b =[p] b'}
{c : C b} {c' : C b'} (r : c =[apd011 C p q] c')
{k : A → A} {l : Π⦃a⦄, B a → B (k a)} (m : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a}, C b → C (l b))
{f : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a}, C b → A'}
(s : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a} (c : C b), f (m c) = f c)
: square (apd0111 (λa b c, f (m c)) p q r) (apd0111 f p q r) (s c) (s c') :=
begin
induction q, esimp at r, induction r using idp_rec_on, exact hrfl
end
end eq
|
31ff41bb30e2e98e541c0f032c64166dac3ce57a | 07c76fbd96ea1786cc6392fa834be62643cea420 | /hott/homotopy/susp.hlean | 7d8eba65e92da919d43fe06f58609eb0a3a8da7f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/lean2 | 5a430a153b570bf70dc8526d06f18fc000a60ad9 | 0889cf65b7b3cebfb8831b8731d89c2453dd1e9f | refs/heads/master | 1,592,036,508,364 | 1,545,093,958,000 | 1,545,093,958,000 | 75,436,854 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,480,718,780,000 | 1,480,718,780,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,816 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Ulrik Buchholtz
Declaration of suspension
-/
import hit.pushout types.pointed2 cubical.square .connectedness
open pushout unit eq equiv pointed is_equiv
definition susp' (A : Type) : Type := pushout (λ(a : A), star) (λ(a : A), star)
namespace susp
definition north' {A : Type} : susp' A :=
inl star
definition pointed_susp [instance] [constructor] (X : Type)
: pointed (susp' X) :=
pointed.mk north'
end susp open susp
definition susp [constructor] (X : Type) : Type* :=
pointed.MK (susp' X) north'
notation `⅀` := susp
namespace susp
variable {A : Type}
definition north {A : Type} : susp A :=
north'
definition south {A : Type} : susp A :=
inr star
definition merid (a : A) : @north A = @south A :=
glue a
protected definition rec {P : susp A → Type} (PN : P north) (PS : P south)
(Pm : Π(a : A), PN =[merid a] PS) (x : susp' A) : P x :=
begin
induction x with u u,
{ cases u, exact PN},
{ cases u, exact PS},
{ apply Pm},
end
protected definition rec_on [reducible] {P : susp A → Type} (y : susp' A)
(PN : P north) (PS : P south) (Pm : Π(a : A), PN =[merid a] PS) : P y :=
susp.rec PN PS Pm y
theorem rec_merid {P : susp A → Type} (PN : P north) (PS : P south)
(Pm : Π(a : A), PN =[merid a] PS) (a : A)
: apd (susp.rec PN PS Pm) (merid a) = Pm a :=
!rec_glue
protected definition elim {P : Type} (PN : P) (PS : P) (Pm : A → PN = PS)
(x : susp' A) : P :=
susp.rec PN PS (λa, pathover_of_eq _ (Pm a)) x
protected definition elim_on [reducible] {P : Type} (x : susp' A)
(PN : P) (PS : P) (Pm : A → PN = PS) : P :=
susp.elim PN PS Pm x
theorem elim_merid {P : Type} {PN PS : P} (Pm : A → PN = PS) (a : A)
: ap (susp.elim PN PS Pm) (merid a) = Pm a :=
begin
apply inj_inv !(pathover_constant (merid a)),
rewrite [▸*,-apd_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑susp.elim,rec_merid],
end
protected definition elim_type (PN : Type) (PS : Type) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
(x : susp' A) : Type :=
pushout.elim_type (λx, PN) (λx, PS) Pm x
protected definition elim_type_on [reducible] (x : susp' A)
(PN : Type) (PS : Type) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS) : Type :=
susp.elim_type PN PS Pm x
theorem elim_type_merid (PN : Type) (PS : Type) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
(a : A) : transport (susp.elim_type PN PS Pm) (merid a) = Pm a :=
!elim_type_glue
theorem elim_type_merid_inv {A : Type} (PN : Type) (PS : Type) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
(a : A) : transport (susp.elim_type PN PS Pm) (merid a)⁻¹ = to_inv (Pm a) :=
!elim_type_glue_inv
protected definition merid_square {a a' : A} (p : a = a')
: square (merid a) (merid a') idp idp :=
by cases p; apply vrefl
end susp
attribute susp.north' susp.north susp.south [constructor]
attribute susp.rec susp.elim [unfold 6] [recursor 6]
attribute susp.elim_type [unfold 5]
attribute susp.rec_on susp.elim_on [unfold 3]
attribute susp.elim_type_on [unfold 2]
namespace susp
open is_trunc is_conn trunc
-- Theorem 8.2.1
definition is_conn_susp [instance] (n : trunc_index) (A : Type)
[H : is_conn n A] : is_conn (n .+1) (susp A) :=
is_contr.mk (tr north)
begin
intro x, induction x with x, induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact (trunc.rec (λa, ap tr (merid a)) (center (trunc n A))) },
{ generalize (center (trunc n A)),
intro x, induction x with a',
apply pathover_of_tr_eq,
rewrite [eq_transport_Fr,idp_con],
revert H, induction n with n IH: intro H,
{ apply is_prop.elim },
{ change ap (@tr n .+2 (susp A)) (merid a) = ap tr (merid a'),
generalize a',
apply is_conn_fun.elim n
(is_conn_fun_from_unit n A a)
(λx : A, trunctype.mk' n (ap (@tr n .+2 (susp A)) (merid a) = ap tr (merid x))),
intros,
change ap (@tr n .+2 (susp A)) (merid a) = ap tr (merid a),
reflexivity }
}
end
/- Flattening lemma -/
open prod prod.ops
section
universe variable u
parameters (A : Type) (PN PS : Type.{u}) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
include Pm
local abbreviation P [unfold 5] := susp.elim_type PN PS Pm
local abbreviation F : A × PN → PN := λz, z.2
local abbreviation G : A × PN → PS := λz, Pm z.1 z.2
protected definition flattening : sigma P ≃ pushout F G :=
begin
apply equiv.trans !pushout.flattening,
fapply pushout.equiv,
{ exact sigma.equiv_prod A PN },
{ apply sigma.sigma_unit_left },
{ apply sigma.sigma_unit_left },
{ reflexivity },
{ reflexivity }
end
end
end susp
/- Functoriality and equivalence -/
namespace susp
variables {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
include f
definition susp_functor' [unfold 4] : susp A → susp B :=
begin
intro x, induction x with a,
{ exact north },
{ exact south },
{ exact merid (f a) }
end
variable [Hf : is_equiv f]
include Hf
open is_equiv
protected definition is_equiv_functor [instance] [constructor] : is_equiv (susp_functor' f) :=
adjointify (susp_functor' f) (susp_functor' f⁻¹)
abstract begin
intro sb, induction sb with b, do 2 reflexivity,
apply eq_pathover,
rewrite [ap_id,-ap_compose' (susp_functor' f) (susp_functor' f⁻¹)],
krewrite [susp.elim_merid,susp.elim_merid], apply transpose,
apply susp.merid_square (right_inv f b)
end end
abstract begin
intro sa, induction sa with a, do 2 reflexivity,
apply eq_pathover,
rewrite [ap_id,-ap_compose' (susp_functor' f⁻¹) (susp_functor' f)],
krewrite [susp.elim_merid,susp.elim_merid], apply transpose,
apply susp.merid_square (left_inv f a)
end end
end susp
namespace susp
variables {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B)
protected definition equiv : susp A ≃ susp B :=
equiv.mk (susp_functor' f) _
end susp
namespace susp
open pointed is_trunc
variables {X X' Y Y' Z : Type*}
definition susp_functor [constructor] (f : X →* Y) : susp X →* susp Y :=
begin
fconstructor,
{ exact susp_functor' f },
{ reflexivity }
end
notation `⅀→`:(max+5) := susp_functor
definition is_equiv_susp_functor [constructor] (f : X →* Y) [Hf : is_equiv f]
: is_equiv (susp_functor f) :=
susp.is_equiv_functor f
definition susp_pequiv [constructor] (f : X ≃* Y) : susp X ≃* susp Y :=
pequiv_of_equiv (susp.equiv f) idp
definition susp_functor_pcompose (g : Y →* Z) (f : X →* Y) :
susp_functor (g ∘* f) ~* susp_functor g ∘* susp_functor f :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ reflexivity },
{ apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
refine !elim_merid ⬝ _ ⬝ (ap_compose (susp_functor g) _ _)⁻¹ᵖ,
refine _ ⬝ ap02 _ !elim_merid⁻¹, exact !elim_merid⁻¹ }},
{ reflexivity },
end
definition susp_functor_phomotopy {f g : X →* Y} (p : f ~* g) :
susp_functor f ~* susp_functor g :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ reflexivity },
{ apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square, esimp, refine !elim_merid ⬝ _ ⬝ !elim_merid⁻¹ᵖ,
exact ap merid (p a), }},
{ reflexivity },
end
notation `⅀⇒`:(max+5) := susp_functor_phomotopy
definition susp_functor_pid (A : Type*) : susp_functor (pid A) ~* pid (susp A) :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ reflexivity },
{ apply eq_pathover_id_right, apply hdeg_square, apply elim_merid }},
{ reflexivity },
end
/- adjunction originally ported from Coq-HoTT,
but we proved some additional naturality conditions -/
definition loop_susp_unit [constructor] (X : Type*) : X →* Ω(susp X) :=
begin
fconstructor,
{ intro x, exact merid x ⬝ (merid pt)⁻¹ },
{ apply con.right_inv },
end
definition loop_susp_unit_natural (f : X →* Y)
: psquare (loop_susp_unit X) (loop_susp_unit Y) f (Ω→ (susp_functor f)) :=
begin
apply ptranspose,
induction X with X x, induction Y with Y y, induction f with f pf, esimp at *, induction pf,
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x', symmetry,
exact
!ap1_gen_idp_left ⬝
(!ap_con ⬝
whisker_left _ !ap_inv) ⬝
(!elim_merid ◾ (inverse2 !elim_merid)) },
{ rewrite [▸*, idp_con (con.right_inv _)],
apply inv_con_eq_of_eq_con,
refine _ ⬝ !con.assoc',
rewrite inverse2_right_inv,
refine _ ⬝ !con.assoc',
rewrite [ap_con_right_inv],
rewrite [ap1_gen_idp_left_con],
rewrite [-ap_compose (concat idp)] },
end
definition loop_susp_counit [constructor] (X : Type*) : susp (Ω X) →* X :=
begin
fapply pmap.mk,
{ intro x, induction x, exact pt, exact pt, exact a },
{ reflexivity },
end
definition loop_susp_counit_natural (f : X →* Y)
: psquare (loop_susp_counit X) (loop_susp_counit Y) (⅀→ (Ω→ f)) f :=
begin
induction X with X x, induction Y with Y y, induction f with f pf, esimp at *, induction pf,
fconstructor,
{ intro x', induction x' with p,
{ reflexivity },
{ reflexivity },
{ esimp, apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
xrewrite [-ap_compose' f, -ap_compose' (susp.elim (f x) (f x) (λ (a : f x = f x), a)),▸*],
xrewrite [+elim_merid, ap1_gen_idp_left] }},
{ reflexivity }
end
definition loop_susp_counit_unit (X : Type*)
: ap1 (loop_susp_counit X) ∘* loop_susp_unit (Ω X) ~* pid (Ω X) :=
begin
induction X with X x, fconstructor,
{ intro p, esimp,
refine !ap1_gen_idp_left ⬝
(!ap_con ⬝
whisker_left _ !ap_inv) ⬝
(!elim_merid ◾ inverse2 !elim_merid) },
{ rewrite [▸*,inverse2_right_inv (elim_merid id idp)],
refine !con.assoc ⬝ _,
xrewrite [ap_con_right_inv (susp.elim x x (λa, a)) (merid idp),ap1_gen_idp_left_con,
-ap_compose] }
end
definition loop_susp_unit_counit (X : Type*)
: loop_susp_counit (susp X) ∘* susp_functor (loop_susp_unit X) ~* pid (susp X) :=
begin
induction X with X x, fconstructor,
{ intro x', induction x',
{ reflexivity },
{ exact merid pt },
{ apply eq_pathover,
xrewrite [▸*, ap_id, -ap_compose' (susp.elim north north (λa, a)), +elim_merid,▸*],
apply square_of_eq, exact !idp_con ⬝ !inv_con_cancel_right⁻¹ }},
{ reflexivity }
end
definition susp_elim [constructor] {X Y : Type*} (f : X →* Ω Y) : susp X →* Y :=
loop_susp_counit Y ∘* susp_functor f
definition loop_susp_intro [constructor] {X Y : Type*} (f : susp X →* Y) : X →* Ω Y :=
ap1 f ∘* loop_susp_unit X
definition susp_elim_susp_functor {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* Ω C) (f : A →* B) :
susp_elim g ∘* susp_functor f ~* susp_elim (g ∘* f) :=
begin
refine !passoc ⬝* _, exact pwhisker_left _ !susp_functor_pcompose⁻¹*
end
definition susp_elim_phomotopy {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* Ω B} (p : f ~* g) : susp_elim f ~* susp_elim g :=
pwhisker_left _ (susp_functor_phomotopy p)
definition susp_elim_natural {X Y Z : Type*} (g : Y →* Z) (f : X →* Ω Y)
: g ∘* susp_elim f ~* susp_elim (Ω→ g ∘* f) :=
begin
refine _ ⬝* pwhisker_left _ !susp_functor_pcompose⁻¹*,
refine !passoc⁻¹* ⬝* _ ⬝* !passoc,
exact pwhisker_right _ !loop_susp_counit_natural
end
definition loop_susp_intro_natural {X Y Z : Type*} (g : susp Y →* Z) (f : X →* Y) :
loop_susp_intro (g ∘* susp_functor f) ~* loop_susp_intro g ∘* f :=
pwhisker_right _ !ap1_pcompose ⬝* !passoc ⬝* pwhisker_left _ !loop_susp_unit_natural ⬝*
!passoc⁻¹*
definition susp_adjoint_loop_right_inv {X Y : Type*} (g : X →* Ω Y) :
loop_susp_intro (susp_elim g) ~* g :=
begin
refine !pwhisker_right !ap1_pcompose ⬝* _,
refine !passoc ⬝* _,
refine !pwhisker_left !loop_susp_unit_natural ⬝* _,
refine !passoc⁻¹* ⬝* _,
refine !pwhisker_right !loop_susp_counit_unit ⬝* _,
apply pid_pcompose
end
definition susp_adjoint_loop_left_inv {X Y : Type*} (f : susp X →* Y) :
susp_elim (loop_susp_intro f) ~* f :=
begin
refine !pwhisker_left !susp_functor_pcompose ⬝* _,
refine !passoc⁻¹* ⬝* _,
refine !pwhisker_right !loop_susp_counit_natural⁻¹* ⬝* _,
refine !passoc ⬝* _,
refine !pwhisker_left !loop_susp_unit_counit ⬝* _,
apply pcompose_pid
end
definition susp_adjoint_loop_unpointed [constructor] (X Y : Type*) : susp X →* Y ≃ X →* Ω Y :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact loop_susp_intro },
{ exact susp_elim },
{ intro g, apply eq_of_phomotopy, exact susp_adjoint_loop_right_inv g },
{ intro f, apply eq_of_phomotopy, exact susp_adjoint_loop_left_inv f }
end
definition susp_functor_pconst_homotopy [unfold 3] {X Y : Type*} (x : susp X) :
susp_functor (pconst X Y) x = pt :=
begin
induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact (merid pt)⁻¹ },
{ apply eq_pathover, refine !elim_merid ⬝ph _ ⬝hp !ap_constant⁻¹, exact square_of_eq !con.right_inv⁻¹ }
end
definition susp_functor_pconst [constructor] (X Y : Type*) :
susp_functor (pconst X Y) ~* pconst (susp X) (susp Y) :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ exact susp_functor_pconst_homotopy },
{ reflexivity }
end
definition susp_pfunctor [constructor] (X Y : Type*) : ppmap X Y →* ppmap (susp X) (susp Y) :=
pmap.mk susp_functor (eq_of_phomotopy !susp_functor_pconst)
definition susp_pelim [constructor] (X Y : Type*) : ppmap X (Ω Y) →* ppmap (susp X) Y :=
ppcompose_left (loop_susp_counit Y) ∘* susp_pfunctor X (Ω Y)
definition loop_susp_pintro [constructor] (X Y : Type*) : ppmap (susp X) Y →* ppmap X (Ω Y) :=
ppcompose_right (loop_susp_unit X) ∘* pap1 (susp X) Y
definition loop_susp_pintro_natural_left (f : X' →* X) :
psquare (loop_susp_pintro X Y) (loop_susp_pintro X' Y)
(ppcompose_right (susp_functor f)) (ppcompose_right f) :=
!pap1_natural_left ⬝h* ppcompose_right_psquare (loop_susp_unit_natural f)
definition loop_susp_pintro_natural_right (f : Y →* Y') :
psquare (loop_susp_pintro X Y) (loop_susp_pintro X Y')
(ppcompose_left f) (ppcompose_left (Ω→ f)) :=
!pap1_natural_right ⬝h* !ppcompose_left_ppcompose_right⁻¹*
definition is_equiv_loop_susp_pintro [constructor] (X Y : Type*) :
is_equiv (loop_susp_pintro X Y) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ exact susp_pelim X Y },
{ intro g, apply eq_of_phomotopy, exact susp_adjoint_loop_right_inv g },
{ intro f, apply eq_of_phomotopy, exact susp_adjoint_loop_left_inv f }
end
definition susp_adjoint_loop [constructor] (X Y : Type*) : ppmap (susp X) Y ≃* ppmap X (Ω Y) :=
pequiv_of_pmap (loop_susp_pintro X Y) (is_equiv_loop_susp_pintro X Y)
definition susp_adjoint_loop_natural_right (f : Y →* Y') :
psquare (susp_adjoint_loop X Y) (susp_adjoint_loop X Y')
(ppcompose_left f) (ppcompose_left (Ω→ f)) :=
loop_susp_pintro_natural_right f
definition susp_adjoint_loop_natural_left (f : X' →* X) :
psquare (susp_adjoint_loop X Y) (susp_adjoint_loop X' Y)
(ppcompose_right (susp_functor f)) (ppcompose_right f) :=
loop_susp_pintro_natural_left f
definition ap1_susp_elim {A : Type*} {X : Type*} (p : A →* Ω X) :
Ω→(susp_elim p) ∘* loop_susp_unit A ~* p :=
susp_adjoint_loop_right_inv p
/- the underlying homotopies of susp_adjoint_loop_natural_* -/
definition susp_adjoint_loop_nat_right (f : susp X →* Y) (g : Y →* Z)
: susp_adjoint_loop X Z (g ∘* f) ~* ap1 g ∘* susp_adjoint_loop X Y f :=
begin
esimp [susp_adjoint_loop],
refine _ ⬝* !passoc,
apply pwhisker_right,
apply ap1_pcompose
end
definition susp_adjoint_loop_nat_left (f : Y →* Ω Z) (g : X →* Y)
: (susp_adjoint_loop X Z)⁻¹ᵉ (f ∘* g) ~* (susp_adjoint_loop Y Z)⁻¹ᵉ f ∘* susp_functor g :=
begin
esimp [susp_adjoint_loop],
refine _ ⬝* !passoc⁻¹*,
apply pwhisker_left,
apply susp_functor_pcompose
end
/- iterated suspension -/
definition iterate_susp (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) : Type* := iterate (λX, susp X) n A
open is_conn trunc_index nat
definition iterate_susp_succ (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) :
iterate_susp (succ n) A = susp (iterate_susp n A) :=
idp
definition is_conn_iterate_susp [instance] (n : ℕ₋₂) (m : ℕ) (A : Type*)
[H : is_conn n A] : is_conn (n + m) (iterate_susp m A) :=
begin induction m with m IH, exact H, exact @is_conn_susp _ _ IH end
-- Separate cases for n = 0, which comes up often
definition is_conn_iterate_susp_zero [instance] (m : ℕ) (A : Type*)
[H : is_conn 0 A] : is_conn m (iterate_susp m A) :=
begin induction m with m IH, exact H, exact @is_conn_susp _ _ IH end
definition iterate_susp_functor (n : ℕ) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) :
iterate_susp n A →* iterate_susp n B :=
begin
induction n with n g,
{ exact f },
{ exact susp_functor g }
end
definition iterate_susp_succ_in (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) :
iterate_susp (succ n) A ≃* iterate_susp n (susp A) :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ reflexivity},
{ exact susp_pequiv IH}
end
definition iterate_susp_adjoint_loopn [constructor] (X Y : Type*) (n : ℕ) :
ppmap (iterate_susp n X) Y ≃* ppmap X (Ω[n] Y) :=
begin
revert X Y, induction n with n IH: intro X Y,
{ reflexivity },
{ refine !susp_adjoint_loop ⬝e* !IH ⬝e* _, apply ppmap_pequiv_ppmap_right,
symmetry, apply loopn_succ_in }
end
end susp
|
e0e4737cc2b7b12b868dc552bd30c48f7b49d598 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/forest.lean | c21dbddd77255d60833aed905ab223b1076b92ed | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,499 | lean | import data.prod
open prod
inductive tree (A : Type) : Type :=
| node : A → forest A → tree A
with forest : Type :=
| nil : forest A
| cons : tree A → forest A → forest A
namespace manual
definition tree.below.{l₁ l₂}
(A : Type.{l₁})
(C₁ : tree A → Type.{l₂})
(C₂ : forest A → Type.{l₂})
(t : tree A) : Type.{max 1 l₂} :=
@tree.rec_on A
(λ t : tree A, Type.{max 1 l₂})
(λ t : forest A, Type.{max 1 l₂})
t
(λ (a : A) (f : forest A) (r : Type.{max 1 l₂}), prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) r)
poly_unit.{max 1 l₂}
(λ (t : tree A) (f : forest A) (rt : Type.{max 1 l₂}) (rf : Type.{max 1 l₂}),
prod.{(max 1 l₂) (max 1 l₂)} (prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₁ t) rt) (prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) rf))
definition forest.below.{l₁ l₂}
(A : Type.{l₁})
(C₁ : tree A → Type.{l₂})
(C₂ : forest A → Type.{l₂})
(f : forest A) : Type.{max 1 l₂} :=
@forest.rec_on A
(λ t : tree A, Type.{max 1 l₂})
(λ t : forest A, Type.{max 1 l₂})
f
(λ (a : A) (f : forest A) (r : Type.{max 1 l₂}), prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) r)
poly_unit.{max 1 l₂}
(λ (t : tree A) (f : forest A) (rt : Type.{max 1 l₂}) (rf : Type.{max 1 l₂}),
prod.{(max 1 l₂) (max 1 l₂)} (prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₁ t) rt) (prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) rf))
definition tree.brec_on.{l₁ l₂}
(A : Type.{l₁})
(C₁ : tree A → Type.{l₂})
(C₂ : forest A → Type.{l₂})
(t : tree A)
(F₁ : Π (t : tree A), tree.below A C₁ C₂ t → C₁ t)
(F₂ : Π (f : forest A), forest.below A C₁ C₂ f → C₂ f)
: C₁ t :=
have general : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₁ t) (tree.below A C₁ C₂ t), from
@tree.rec_on
A
(λ (t' : tree A), prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₁ t') (tree.below A C₁ C₂ t'))
(λ (f' : forest A), prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f') (forest.below A C₁ C₂ f'))
t
(λ (a : A) (f : forest A) (r : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) (forest.below A C₁ C₂ f)),
have b : tree.below A C₁ C₂ (tree.node a f), from
r,
have c : C₁ (tree.node a f), from
F₁ (tree.node a f) b,
prod.mk.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} c b)
(have b : forest.below A C₁ C₂ (forest.nil A), from
poly_unit.star.{max 1 l₂},
have c : C₂ (forest.nil A), from
F₂ (forest.nil A) b,
prod.mk.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} c b)
(λ (t : tree A)
(f : forest A)
(rt : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₁ t) (tree.below A C₁ C₂ t))
(rf : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) (forest.below A C₁ C₂ f)),
have b : forest.below A C₁ C₂ (forest.cons t f), from
prod.mk.{(max 1 l₂) (max 1 l₂)} rt rf,
have c : C₂ (forest.cons t f), from
F₂ (forest.cons t f) b,
prod.mk.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} c b),
pr₁ general
definition forest.brec_on.{l₁ l₂}
(A : Type.{l₁})
(C₁ : tree A → Type.{l₂})
(C₂ : forest A → Type.{l₂})
(f : forest A)
(F₁ : Π (t : tree A), tree.below A C₁ C₂ t → C₁ t)
(F₂ : Π (f : forest A), forest.below A C₁ C₂ f → C₂ f)
: C₂ f :=
have general : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) (forest.below A C₁ C₂ f), from
@forest.rec_on
A
(λ (t' : tree A), prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₁ t') (tree.below A C₁ C₂ t'))
(λ (f' : forest A), prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f') (forest.below A C₁ C₂ f'))
f
(λ (a : A) (f : forest A) (r : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) (forest.below A C₁ C₂ f)),
have b : tree.below A C₁ C₂ (tree.node a f), from
r,
have c : C₁ (tree.node a f), from
F₁ (tree.node a f) b,
prod.mk.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} c b)
(have b : forest.below A C₁ C₂ (forest.nil A), from
poly_unit.star.{max 1 l₂},
have c : C₂ (forest.nil A), from
F₂ (forest.nil A) b,
prod.mk.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} c b)
(λ (t : tree A)
(f : forest A)
(rt : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₁ t) (tree.below A C₁ C₂ t))
(rf : prod.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} (C₂ f) (forest.below A C₁ C₂ f)),
have b : forest.below A C₁ C₂ (forest.cons t f), from
prod.mk.{(max 1 l₂) (max 1 l₂)} rt rf,
have c : C₂ (forest.cons t f), from
F₂ (forest.cons t f) b,
prod.mk.{l₂ (max 1 l₂)} c b),
pr₁ general
end manual
|
5806943b5ff9369bc304c07fa2983f640f0b262a | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/topology/dense_embedding.lean | 6464cdc2f68e7cf8ad00de1ce4dd02601290d55f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,459 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import topology.separation
import topology.bases
/-!
# Dense embeddings
This file defines three properties of functions:
* `dense_range f` means `f` has dense image;
* `dense_inducing i` means `i` is also `inducing`;
* `dense_embedding e` means `e` is also an `embedding`.
The main theorem `continuous_extend` gives a criterion for a function
`f : X → Z` to a regular (T₃) space Z to extend along a dense embedding
`i : X → Y` to a continuous function `g : Y → Z`. Actually `i` only
has to be `dense_inducing` (not necessarily injective).
-/
noncomputable theory
open set filter
open_locale classical topological_space filter
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
/-- `i : α → β` is "dense inducing" if it has dense range and the topology on `α`
is the one induced by `i` from the topology on `β`. -/
structure dense_inducing [topological_space α] [topological_space β] (i : α → β)
extends inducing i : Prop :=
(dense : dense_range i)
namespace dense_inducing
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
variables {i : α → β} (di : dense_inducing i)
lemma nhds_eq_comap (di : dense_inducing i) :
∀ a : α, 𝓝 a = comap i (𝓝 $ i a) :=
di.to_inducing.nhds_eq_comap
protected lemma continuous (di : dense_inducing i) : continuous i :=
di.to_inducing.continuous
lemma closure_range : closure (range i) = univ :=
di.dense.closure_range
lemma preconnected_space [preconnected_space α] (di : dense_inducing i) : preconnected_space β :=
di.dense.preconnected_space di.continuous
lemma closure_image_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} (di : dense_inducing i) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
closure (i '' s) ∈ 𝓝 (i a) :=
begin
rw [di.nhds_eq_comap a, ((nhds_basis_opens _).comap _).mem_iff] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨U, ⟨haU, hUo⟩, sub : i ⁻¹' U ⊆ s⟩,
refine mem_of_superset (hUo.mem_nhds haU) _,
calc U ⊆ closure (i '' (i ⁻¹' U)) : di.dense.subset_closure_image_preimage_of_is_open hUo
... ⊆ closure (i '' s) : closure_mono (image_subset i sub)
end
/-- The product of two dense inducings is a dense inducing -/
protected lemma prod [topological_space γ] [topological_space δ]
{e₁ : α → β} {e₂ : γ → δ} (de₁ : dense_inducing e₁) (de₂ : dense_inducing e₂) :
dense_inducing (λ(p : α × γ), (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2)) :=
{ induced := (de₁.to_inducing.prod_mk de₂.to_inducing).induced,
dense := de₁.dense.prod_map de₂.dense }
open topological_space
/-- If the domain of a `dense_inducing` map is a separable space, then so is the codomain. -/
protected lemma separable_space [separable_space α] : separable_space β :=
di.dense.separable_space di.continuous
variables [topological_space δ] {f : γ → α} {g : γ → δ} {h : δ → β}
/--
γ -f→ α
g↓ ↓e
δ -h→ β
-/
lemma tendsto_comap_nhds_nhds {d : δ} {a : α} (di : dense_inducing i)
(H : tendsto h (𝓝 d) (𝓝 (i a))) (comm : h ∘ g = i ∘ f) : tendsto f (comap g (𝓝 d)) (𝓝 a) :=
begin
have lim1 : map g (comap g (𝓝 d)) ≤ 𝓝 d := map_comap_le,
replace lim1 : map h (map g (comap g (𝓝 d))) ≤ map h (𝓝 d) := map_mono lim1,
rw [filter.map_map, comm, ← filter.map_map, map_le_iff_le_comap] at lim1,
have lim2 : comap i (map h (𝓝 d)) ≤ comap i (𝓝 (i a)) := comap_mono H,
rw ← di.nhds_eq_comap at lim2,
exact le_trans lim1 lim2,
end
protected lemma nhds_within_ne_bot (di : dense_inducing i) (b : β) :
ne_bot (𝓝[range i] b) :=
di.dense.nhds_within_ne_bot b
lemma comap_nhds_ne_bot (di : dense_inducing i) (b : β) : ne_bot (comap i (𝓝 b)) :=
comap_ne_bot $ λ s hs,
let ⟨_, ⟨ha, a, rfl⟩⟩ := mem_closure_iff_nhds.1 (di.dense b) s hs in ⟨a, ha⟩
variables [topological_space γ]
/-- If `i : α → β` is a dense inducing, then any function `f : α → γ` "extends"
to a function `g = extend di f : β → γ`. If `γ` is Hausdorff and `f` has a
continuous extension, then `g` is the unique such extension. In general,
`g` might not be continuous or even extend `f`. -/
def extend (di : dense_inducing i) (f : α → γ) (b : β) : γ :=
@@lim _ ⟨f (di.dense.some b)⟩ (comap i (𝓝 b)) f
lemma extend_eq_of_tendsto [t2_space γ] {b : β} {c : γ} {f : α → γ}
(hf : tendsto f (comap i (𝓝 b)) (𝓝 c)) :
di.extend f b = c :=
by haveI := di.comap_nhds_ne_bot; exact hf.lim_eq
lemma extend_eq_at [t2_space γ] {f : α → γ} (a : α) (hf : continuous_at f a) :
di.extend f (i a) = f a :=
extend_eq_of_tendsto _ $ di.nhds_eq_comap a ▸ hf
lemma extend_eq [t2_space γ] {f : α → γ} (hf : continuous f) (a : α) :
di.extend f (i a) = f a :=
di.extend_eq_at a hf.continuous_at
lemma extend_unique_at [t2_space γ] {b : β} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (di : dense_inducing i)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in comap i (𝓝 b), g (i x) = f x) (hg : continuous_at g b) :
di.extend f b = g b :=
begin
refine di.extend_eq_of_tendsto (λ s hs, mem_map.2 _),
suffices : ∀ᶠ (x : α) in comap i (𝓝 b), g (i x) ∈ s,
from hf.mp (this.mono $ λ x hgx hfx, hfx ▸ hgx),
clear hf f,
refine eventually_comap.2 ((hg.eventually hs).mono _),
rintros _ hxs x rfl,
exact hxs
end
lemma extend_unique [t2_space γ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (di : dense_inducing i)
(hf : ∀ x, g (i x) = f x) (hg : continuous g) :
di.extend f = g :=
funext $ λ b, extend_unique_at di (eventually_of_forall hf) hg.continuous_at
lemma continuous_at_extend [regular_space γ] {b : β} {f : α → γ} (di : dense_inducing i)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, ∃c, tendsto f (comap i $ 𝓝 x) (𝓝 c)) :
continuous_at (di.extend f) b :=
begin
set φ := di.extend f,
haveI := di.comap_nhds_ne_bot,
suffices : ∀ V' ∈ 𝓝 (φ b), is_closed V' → φ ⁻¹' V' ∈ 𝓝 b,
by simpa [continuous_at, (closed_nhds_basis _).tendsto_right_iff],
intros V' V'_in V'_closed,
set V₁ := {x | tendsto f (comap i $ 𝓝 x) (𝓝 $ φ x)},
have V₁_in : V₁ ∈ 𝓝 b,
{ filter_upwards [hf],
rintros x ⟨c, hc⟩,
dsimp [V₁, φ],
rwa di.extend_eq_of_tendsto hc },
obtain ⟨V₂, V₂_in, V₂_op, hV₂⟩ : ∃ V₂ ∈ 𝓝 b, is_open V₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ i ⁻¹' V₂, f x ∈ V',
{ simpa [and_assoc] using ((nhds_basis_opens' b).comap i).tendsto_left_iff.mp
(mem_of_mem_nhds V₁_in : b ∈ V₁) V' V'_in },
suffices : ∀ x ∈ V₁ ∩ V₂, φ x ∈ V',
{ filter_upwards [inter_mem V₁_in V₂_in], exact this },
rintros x ⟨x_in₁, x_in₂⟩,
have hV₂x : V₂ ∈ 𝓝 x := is_open.mem_nhds V₂_op x_in₂,
apply V'_closed.mem_of_tendsto x_in₁,
use V₂,
tauto,
end
lemma continuous_extend [regular_space γ] {f : α → γ} (di : dense_inducing i)
(hf : ∀b, ∃c, tendsto f (comap i (𝓝 b)) (𝓝 c)) : continuous (di.extend f) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume b, di.continuous_at_extend $ univ_mem' hf
lemma mk'
(i : α → β)
(c : continuous i)
(dense : ∀x, x ∈ closure (range i))
(H : ∀ (a:α) s ∈ 𝓝 a,
∃t ∈ 𝓝 (i a), ∀ b, i b ∈ t → b ∈ s) :
dense_inducing i :=
{ induced := (induced_iff_nhds_eq i).2 $
λ a, le_antisymm (tendsto_iff_comap.1 $ c.tendsto _) (by simpa [le_def] using H a),
dense := dense }
end dense_inducing
/-- A dense embedding is an embedding with dense image. -/
structure dense_embedding [topological_space α] [topological_space β] (e : α → β)
extends dense_inducing e : Prop :=
(inj : function.injective e)
theorem dense_embedding.mk'
[topological_space α] [topological_space β] (e : α → β)
(c : continuous e)
(dense : dense_range e)
(inj : function.injective e)
(H : ∀ (a:α) s ∈ 𝓝 a,
∃t ∈ 𝓝 (e a), ∀ b, e b ∈ t → b ∈ s) :
dense_embedding e :=
{ inj := inj,
..dense_inducing.mk' e c dense H}
namespace dense_embedding
open topological_space
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ] [topological_space δ]
variables {e : α → β} (de : dense_embedding e)
lemma inj_iff {x y} : e x = e y ↔ x = y := de.inj.eq_iff
lemma to_embedding : embedding e :=
{ induced := de.induced,
inj := de.inj }
/-- If the domain of a `dense_embedding` is a separable space, then so is its codomain. -/
protected lemma separable_space [separable_space α] : separable_space β :=
de.to_dense_inducing.separable_space
/-- The product of two dense embeddings is a dense embedding. -/
protected lemma prod {e₁ : α → β} {e₂ : γ → δ} (de₁ : dense_embedding e₁)
(de₂ : dense_embedding e₂) :
dense_embedding (λ(p : α × γ), (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2)) :=
{ inj := assume ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨y₁, y₂⟩,
by simp; exact assume h₁ h₂, ⟨de₁.inj h₁, de₂.inj h₂⟩,
..dense_inducing.prod de₁.to_dense_inducing de₂.to_dense_inducing }
/-- The dense embedding of a subtype inside its closure. -/
def subtype_emb {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (e : α → β) (x : {x // p x}) :
{x // x ∈ closure (e '' {x | p x})} :=
⟨e x, subset_closure $ mem_image_of_mem e x.prop⟩
protected lemma subtype (p : α → Prop) : dense_embedding (subtype_emb p e) :=
{ dense_embedding .
dense := assume ⟨x, hx⟩, closure_subtype.mpr $
have (λ (x : {x // p x}), e x) = e ∘ coe, from rfl,
begin
rw ← image_univ,
simp [(image_comp _ _ _).symm, (∘), subtype_emb, -image_univ],
rw [this, image_comp, subtype.coe_image],
simp,
assumption
end,
inj := assume ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h, subtype.eq $ de.inj $ @@congr_arg subtype.val h,
induced := (induced_iff_nhds_eq _).2 (assume ⟨x, hx⟩,
by simp [subtype_emb, nhds_subtype_eq_comap, de.to_inducing.nhds_eq_comap, comap_comap, (∘)]) }
end dense_embedding
lemma is_closed_property [topological_space β] {e : α → β} {p : β → Prop}
(he : dense_range e) (hp : is_closed {x | p x}) (h : ∀a, p (e a)) :
∀b, p b :=
have univ ⊆ {b | p b},
from calc univ = closure (range e) : he.closure_range.symm
... ⊆ closure {b | p b} : closure_mono $ range_subset_iff.mpr h
... = _ : hp.closure_eq,
assume b, this trivial
lemma is_closed_property2 [topological_space β] {e : α → β} {p : β → β → Prop}
(he : dense_range e) (hp : is_closed {q:β×β | p q.1 q.2}) (h : ∀a₁ a₂, p (e a₁) (e a₂)) :
∀b₁ b₂, p b₁ b₂ :=
have ∀q:β×β, p q.1 q.2,
from is_closed_property (he.prod_map he) hp $ λ _, h _ _,
assume b₁ b₂, this ⟨b₁, b₂⟩
lemma is_closed_property3 [topological_space β] {e : α → β} {p : β → β → β → Prop}
(he : dense_range e) (hp : is_closed {q:β×β×β | p q.1 q.2.1 q.2.2})
(h : ∀a₁ a₂ a₃, p (e a₁) (e a₂) (e a₃)) :
∀b₁ b₂ b₃, p b₁ b₂ b₃ :=
have ∀q:β×β×β, p q.1 q.2.1 q.2.2,
from is_closed_property (he.prod_map $ he.prod_map he) hp $ λ _, h _ _ _,
assume b₁ b₂ b₃, this ⟨b₁, b₂, b₃⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma dense_range.induction_on [topological_space β] {e : α → β} (he : dense_range e) {p : β → Prop}
(b₀ : β) (hp : is_closed {b | p b}) (ih : ∀a:α, p $ e a) : p b₀ :=
is_closed_property he hp ih b₀
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma dense_range.induction_on₂ [topological_space β] {e : α → β} {p : β → β → Prop}
(he : dense_range e) (hp : is_closed {q:β×β | p q.1 q.2}) (h : ∀a₁ a₂, p (e a₁) (e a₂))
(b₁ b₂ : β) : p b₁ b₂ := is_closed_property2 he hp h _ _
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma dense_range.induction_on₃ [topological_space β] {e : α → β} {p : β → β → β → Prop}
(he : dense_range e) (hp : is_closed {q:β×β×β | p q.1 q.2.1 q.2.2})
(h : ∀a₁ a₂ a₃, p (e a₁) (e a₂) (e a₃))
(b₁ b₂ b₃ : β) : p b₁ b₂ b₃ := is_closed_property3 he hp h _ _ _
section
variables [topological_space β] [topological_space γ] [t2_space γ]
variables {f : α → β}
/-- Two continuous functions to a t2-space that agree on the dense range of a function are equal. -/
lemma dense_range.equalizer (hfd : dense_range f)
{g h : β → γ} (hg : continuous g) (hh : continuous h) (H : g ∘ f = h ∘ f) :
g = h :=
funext $ λ y, hfd.induction_on y (is_closed_eq hg hh) $ congr_fun H
end
|
c0c71d729d1aad2c35976fbb9d84714abd69fa31 | 53618200bef52920c1e974173f78cd378d268f3e | /hott/homotopy/cofiber.hlean | 5c789151819964a128f306973666a8ee283fb4f8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sayantangkhan/lean2 | cc41e61102e0fcc8b65e8501186dcca40b19b22e | 0fc0378969678eec25ea425a426bb48a184a6db0 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,323,112,724 | 1,489,425,932,000 | 1,489,425,932,000 | 84,854,525 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,489,425,509,000 | 1,489,425,509,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,521 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
The Cofiber Type
-/
import hit.pushout function .susp types.unit
open eq pushout unit pointed is_trunc is_equiv susp unit equiv
definition cofiber {A B : Type} (f : A → B) := pushout (λ (a : A), ⋆) f
namespace cofiber
section
parameters {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
protected definition base : cofiber f := inl ⋆
protected definition cod : B → cofiber f := inr
parameter {f}
protected definition glue (a : A) : cofiber.base f = cofiber.cod f (f a) :=
pushout.glue a
parameter (f)
protected definition contr_of_equiv [H : is_equiv f] : is_contr (cofiber f) :=
begin
fapply is_contr.mk, exact base,
intro a, induction a with [u, b],
{ cases u, reflexivity },
{ exact !glue ⬝ ap inr (right_inv f b) },
{ apply eq_pathover, refine _ ⬝hp !ap_id⁻¹, refine !ap_constant ⬝ph _,
apply move_bot_of_left, refine !idp_con ⬝ph _, apply transpose, esimp,
refine _ ⬝hp (ap (ap inr) !adj⁻¹), refine _ ⬝hp !ap_compose, apply square_Flr_idp_ap },
end
parameter {f}
protected definition rec {P : cofiber f → Type}
(Pbase : P base) (Pcod : Π (b : B), P (cod b))
(Pglue : Π (a : A), pathover P Pbase (glue a) (Pcod (f a))) :
(Π y, P y) :=
begin
intro y, induction y, induction x, exact Pbase, exact Pcod x, esimp, exact Pglue x,
end
protected definition rec_on {P : cofiber f → Type} (y : cofiber f)
(Pbase : P base) (Pcod : Π (b : B), P (cod b))
(Pglue : Π (a : A), pathover P Pbase (glue a) (Pcod (f a))) : P y :=
cofiber.rec Pbase Pcod Pglue y
protected definition elim {P : Type} (Pbase : P) (Pcod : B → P)
(Pglue : Π (x : A), Pbase = Pcod (f x)) (y : cofiber f) : P :=
pushout.elim (λu, Pbase) Pcod Pglue y
protected definition elim_on {P : Type} (y : cofiber f) (Pbase : P) (Pcod : B → P)
(Pglue : Π (x : A), Pbase = Pcod (f x)) : P :=
cofiber.elim Pbase Pcod Pglue y
protected theorem elim_glue {P : Type} (y : cofiber f) (Pbase : P) (Pcod : B → P)
(Pglue : Π (x : A), Pbase = Pcod (f x)) (a : A)
: ap (elim Pbase Pcod Pglue) (glue a) = Pglue a :=
!pushout.elim_glue
end
end cofiber
attribute cofiber.base cofiber.cod [constructor]
attribute cofiber.rec cofiber.elim [recursor 8] [unfold 8]
attribute cofiber.rec_on cofiber.elim_on [unfold 5]
-- pointed version
definition pcofiber [constructor] {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : Type* :=
pointed.MK (cofiber f) !cofiber.base
notation `ℂ` := pcofiber
namespace cofiber
variables (A : Type*)
definition cofiber_unit : pcofiber (pconst A punit) ≃* psusp A :=
begin
fapply pequiv_of_pmap,
{ fconstructor, intro x, induction x, exact north, exact south, exact merid x,
reflexivity },
{ esimp, fapply adjointify,
{ intro s, induction s, exact inl ⋆, exact inr ⋆, apply glue a },
{ intro s, induction s, do 2 reflexivity, esimp,
apply eq_pathover, refine _ ⬝hp !ap_id⁻¹, apply hdeg_square,
refine !(ap_compose (pushout.elim _ _ _)) ⬝ _,
refine ap _ !elim_merid ⬝ _, apply elim_glue },
{ intro c, induction c with s, reflexivity,
induction s, reflexivity, esimp, apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
refine _ ⬝ !ap_id⁻¹, refine !(ap_compose (pushout.elim _ _ _)) ⬝ _,
refine ap02 _ !elim_glue ⬝ _, apply elim_merid }},
end
end cofiber
|
bd93bf0af3791232da79173a8b27a1a3cd449439 | 77cc0c0aa84a25574cde49a43e1ea911e4992d9b | /Lean Proof RSA.lean | 91a5d70d550d301d2b2e59c80c46685fe1166e01 | [] | no_license | GGFSilva/LeanCryptographyProof | 41ed2cb4d67949f2e2dc6eba63d82c786aa179d3 | bea98d6201546f1e38a08fd3eb7be494e589b006 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,411,996,962 | 1,585,665,794,000 | 1,585,665,794,000 | 251,599,965 | 2 | 2 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,506 | lean | open nat
variables one x n p q d e : nat
variable gcd (a b : nat) : nat
variable phi (n : nat) : nat
variable prime (a : nat) : Prop
variable congruent (a b modulus : nat) : Prop
premise nDef : n = p * q
premise pPhi : phi p = p - one
premise qPhi : phi q = q - one
premise nPhi : phi n = (q - one) * (p - one)
premise xLess : x < n
premise pIsPrime : prime p
premise qIsPrime : prime q
premise de_Inverse : (congruent (d * e) one (phi n))
premise OneMul : ∀ n : nat, one * n = n
premise OneExp : ∀ n : nat, one ^ n = one
premise ExpOne : ∀ n : nat, n ^ one = n
premise ExpSum (a b c : nat) : (a ^ b) * (a ^ c) = a ^ (b + c)
premise ExpMul (a b c : nat) : (a ^ b) ^ c = a ^ (b * c)
premise ExpSwap (a b c : nat) : (a ^ b) ^ c = (a ^ c) ^ b
premise ModuloDef (a b n : nat) : congruent a b n ↔ ∃ c, a = b + (c * n)
premise CongruenceReflexivity (a b n : nat) : congruent a b n → congruent b a n
premise CongruenceScaling (a b n k : nat) : congruent a b n → congruent (a * k) (b * k) n
premise CongruenceExponentiation (a b n k : nat) : congruent a b n → congruent (a ^ k) (b ^ k) n
premise EqMul (a b k : nat) : a = b → k * a = k * b
premise MulDistrib (a b c : nat) : a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c)
premise Euler (a b : nat) : gcd a b = one → congruent (a ^ (phi b)) one b
premise GCDProperty (a b c : nat) : gcd a (b * c) ≠ one → prime b → prime c → a < b * c → (((∃ n, a = n * b) ∧ (gcd a c = one)) ∨ ((∃ n, a = n * c) ∧ (gcd a b = one)))
theorem ProofCoprime (t : nat) : gcd x n = one → congruent (x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t)) x n :=
assume H1 : gcd x n = one,
have H2 : congruent (x ^ (phi n)) one n, from Euler x n H1,
have Hexpt : congruent (x ^ (phi n)) one n → congruent ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) (one ^ t) n, from CongruenceExponentiation (x ^ (phi n)) one n t,
have H3 : congruent ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) (one ^ t) n, from Hexpt H2,
have Honet : one ^ t = one, from OneExp t,
have H4 : congruent ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) one n, from eq.subst Honet H3,
have Hmulx : congruent ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) one n → congruent (((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) * x) (one * x) n, from CongruenceScaling ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) one n x,
have H5 : congruent (((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) * x) (one * x) n, from Hmulx H4,
have Honex : one * x = x, from OneMul x,
have H6 : congruent (((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) * x) x n, from eq.subst Honex H5,
show congruent (x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t)) x n, from eq.subst (mul.comm ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) x) H6
theorem ProofNotCoprime_Part1 : gcd x n ≠ one → (((∃ n, x = n * p) ∧ (gcd x q = one)) ∨ ((∃ n, x = n * q) ∧ (gcd x p = one))) :=
assume H1 : gcd x n ≠ one,
have H2 : x < p * q, from eq.subst nDef xLess,
have H3 : gcd x (p * q) ≠ one, from eq.subst nDef H1,
show (((∃ n, x = n * p) ∧ (gcd x q = one)) ∨ ((∃ n, x = n * q) ∧ (gcd x p = one))), from GCDProperty x p q H3 pIsPrime qIsPrime H2
theorem ProofNotCoprime_Part2 (t : nat) : (∃ n, x = n * p) ∧ (gcd x q = one) → congruent (x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t)) x n :=
assume H1 : (∃ n, x = n * p) ∧ (gcd x q = one),
have gcd x q = one, from and.elim_right H1,
have congruent (x ^ (phi q)) one q, from Euler x q this,
have congruent ((x ^ (phi q)) ^ t) (one ^ t) q, from CongruenceExponentiation (x ^ (phi q)) one q t this,
have congruent ((x ^ (phi q)) ^ t) one q, from eq.subst (OneExp t) this,
have congruent (((x ^ (phi q)) ^ t) ^ (p - one)) (one ^ (p - one)) q, from CongruenceExponentiation ((x ^ (phi q)) ^ t) one q (p - one) this,
have congruent (((x ^ (phi q)) ^ t) ^ (p - one)) one q, from eq.subst (OneExp (p - one)) this,
have congruent (((x ^ (phi q)) ^ (p - one)) ^ t) one q, from eq.subst (ExpSwap (x ^ (phi q)) t (p - one)) this,
have congruent ((x ^ ((phi q) * (p - one))) ^ t) one q, from eq.subst (ExpMul x (phi q) (p - one)) this,
have congruent ((x ^ ((q - one) * (p - one))) ^ t) one q, from eq.subst qPhi this,
have congruent ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) one q, from eq.subst (eq.symm nPhi) this,
have ∃ c, ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = one + (c * q), from (iff.elim_left (ModuloDef ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) one q)) this,
exists.elim this (fun (v : nat) (Hv : ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = one + (v * q)),
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x * (one + (v * q)), from EqMul ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) (one + (v * q)) x Hv,
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = (x * one) + (x * (v * q)), from eq.trans this (MulDistrib x one (v * q)),
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = (one * x) + (x * (v * q)), from eq.subst (mul.comm x one) this,
have Hxvq : x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + (x * (v * q)), from eq.subst (OneMul x) this,
have ∃ n, x = n * p, from and.elim_left H1,
exists.elim this (fun (w : nat) (Hw : x = w * p),
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + ((w * p) * (v * q)), from eq.subst Hw Hxvq,
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + (w * (p * (v * q))), from eq.subst (mul.assoc w p (v * q)) this,
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + (w * (p * (q * v))), from eq.subst (mul.comm v q) this,
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + (w * ((p * q) * v)), from eq.subst (eq.symm (mul.assoc p q v)) this,
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + (w * (n * v)), from eq.subst (eq.symm nDef) this,
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + (w * (v * n)), from eq.subst (mul.comm n v) this,
have x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + (w * v) * n, from eq.subst (eq.symm (mul.assoc w v n)) this,
have ∃ i, x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t) = x + i * n, from exists.intro (w * v) this,
show congruent (x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t)) x n, from (iff.elim_right (ModuloDef (x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t)) x n)) this))
theorem ProofFinal (t : nat) : congruent (x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t)) x n → congruent (x ^ (one + ((phi n) * t))) x n :=
assume H1 : congruent (x * ((x ^ (phi n)) ^ t)) x n,
have H2 : congruent (x * (x ^ ((phi n) * t))) x n, from eq.subst (ExpMul x (phi n) t) H1,
have Honex : x = x ^ one, from eq.symm (ExpOne x),
have H3 : congruent ((x ^ one) * (x ^ ((phi n) * t))) x n, from eq.subst Honex H2,
show congruent (x ^ (one + ((phi n) * t))) x n, from eq.subst (ExpSum x one ((phi n) * t)) H3
|
2372ffbc04400a4d5a6b8b5029b3ab42867f31d9 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/category_theory/sites/types_auto.lean | 0a6318cd4b5907d3563cc4a4298b8d5eb9219e85 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,084 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.category_theory.sites.canonical
import Mathlib.category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u u_1
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Grothendieck Topology and Sheaves on the Category of Types
In this file we define a Grothendieck topology on the category of types,
and construct the canonical functor that sends a type to a sheaf over
the category of types, and make this an equivalence of categories.
Then we prove that the topology defined is the canonical topology.
-/
namespace category_theory
/-- A Grothendieck topology associated to the category of all types.
A sieve is a covering iff it is jointly surjective. -/
def types_grothendieck_topology : grothendieck_topology (Type u) :=
grothendieck_topology.mk
(fun (α : Type u) (S : sieve α) => ∀ (x : α), coe_fn S PUnit fun (_x : PUnit) => x) sorry sorry
sorry
/-- The discrete sieve on a type, which only includes arrows whose image is a subsingleton. -/
@[simp] theorem discrete_sieve_apply (α : Type u) (β : Type u) (f : β ⟶ α) :
coe_fn (discrete_sieve α) β f = ∃ (x : α), ∀ (y : β), f y = x :=
Eq.refl (coe_fn (discrete_sieve α) β f)
theorem discrete_sieve_mem (α : Type u) : discrete_sieve α ∈ coe_fn types_grothendieck_topology α :=
fun (x : α) => Exists.intro x fun (y : PUnit) => rfl
/-- The discrete presieve on a type, which only includes arrows whose domain is a singleton. -/
def discrete_presieve (α : Type u) : presieve α :=
fun (β : Type u) (f : β ⟶ α) => ∃ (x : β), ∀ (y : β), y = x
theorem generate_discrete_presieve_mem (α : Type u) :
sieve.generate (discrete_presieve α) ∈ coe_fn types_grothendieck_topology α :=
sorry
theorem is_sheaf_yoneda' {α : Type u} :
presieve.is_sheaf types_grothendieck_topology (functor.obj yoneda α) :=
sorry
/-- The yoneda functor that sends a type to a sheaf over the category of types -/
@[simp] theorem yoneda'_map (α : Type u) (β : Type u) (f : α ⟶ β) :
functor.map yoneda' f = functor.map yoneda f :=
Eq.refl (functor.map yoneda' f)
@[simp] theorem yoneda'_comp : yoneda' ⋙ induced_functor subtype.val = yoneda := rfl
/-- Given a presheaf `P` on the category of types, construct
a map `P(α) → (α → P(*))` for all type `α`. -/
def eval (P : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (α : Type u) (s : functor.obj P (opposite.op α)) (x : α) :
functor.obj P (opposite.op PUnit) :=
functor.map P (has_hom.hom.op (↾fun (_x : PUnit) => x)) s
/-- Given a sheaf `S` on the category of types, construct a map
`(α → S(*)) → S(α)` that is inverse to `eval`. -/
def types_glue (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (hs : presieve.is_sheaf types_grothendieck_topology S)
(α : Type u) (f : α → functor.obj S (opposite.op PUnit)) : functor.obj S (opposite.op α) :=
presieve.is_sheaf_for.amalgamate sorry
(fun (β : Type u) (g : β ⟶ α) (hg : discrete_presieve α g) =>
functor.map S (has_hom.hom.op (↾fun (x : β) => PUnit.unit)) (f (g (classical.some hg))))
sorry
theorem eval_types_glue {S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
{hs : presieve.is_sheaf types_grothendieck_topology S} {α : Type u}
(f : α → functor.obj S (opposite.op PUnit)) : eval S α (types_glue S hs α f) = f :=
sorry
theorem types_glue_eval {S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
{hs : presieve.is_sheaf types_grothendieck_topology S} {α : Type u}
(s : functor.obj S (opposite.op α)) : types_glue S hs α (eval S α s) = s :=
sorry
/-- Given a sheaf `S`, construct an equivalence `S(α) ≃ (α → S(*))`. -/
def eval_equiv (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (hs : presieve.is_sheaf types_grothendieck_topology S)
(α : Type u) : functor.obj S (opposite.op α) ≃ (α → functor.obj S (opposite.op PUnit)) :=
equiv.mk (eval S α) (types_glue S hs α) types_glue_eval eval_types_glue
theorem eval_map (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (α : Type u) (β : Type u) (f : β ⟶ α)
(s : functor.obj S (opposite.op α)) (x : β) :
eval S β (functor.map S (has_hom.hom.op f) s) x = eval S α s (f x) :=
sorry
/-- Given a sheaf `S`, construct an isomorphism `S ≅ [-, S(*)]`. -/
def equiv_yoneda (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (hs : presieve.is_sheaf types_grothendieck_topology S) :
S ≅ functor.obj yoneda (functor.obj S (opposite.op PUnit)) :=
nat_iso.of_components (fun (α : Type uᵒᵖ) => equiv.to_iso (eval_equiv S hs (opposite.unop α)))
sorry
/-- Given a sheaf `S`, construct an isomorphism `S ≅ [-, S(*)]`. -/
@[simp] theorem equiv_yoneda'_inv (S : SheafOfTypes types_grothendieck_topology) :
iso.inv (equiv_yoneda' S) = iso.inv (equiv_yoneda (subtype.val S) (equiv_yoneda'._proof_1 S)) :=
Eq.refl (iso.inv (equiv_yoneda' S))
theorem eval_app (S₁ : SheafOfTypes types_grothendieck_topology)
(S₂ : SheafOfTypes types_grothendieck_topology) (f : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (α : Type u)
(s : functor.obj (subtype.val S₁) (opposite.op α)) (x : α) :
eval (subtype.val S₂) α (nat_trans.app f (opposite.op α) s) x =
nat_trans.app f (opposite.op PUnit) (eval (subtype.val S₁) α s x) :=
Eq.symm (congr_fun (nat_trans.naturality' f (has_hom.hom.op (↾fun (_x : PUnit) => x))) s)
/-- `yoneda'` induces an equivalence of category between `Type u` and
`Sheaf types_grothendieck_topology`. -/
@[simp] theorem type_equiv_inverse_obj (X : SheafOfTypes types_grothendieck_topology) :
functor.obj (equivalence.inverse type_equiv) X = functor.obj (↑X) (opposite.op PUnit) :=
Eq.refl (functor.obj (↑X) (opposite.op PUnit))
theorem subcanonical_types_grothendieck_topology : sheaf.subcanonical types_grothendieck_topology :=
sheaf.subcanonical.of_yoneda_is_sheaf types_grothendieck_topology
fun (X : Type u) => is_sheaf_yoneda'
theorem types_grothendieck_topology_eq_canonical :
types_grothendieck_topology = sheaf.canonical_topology (Type u) :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
f2768624e40ccdb679da36fff9d6206319540328 | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /tests/lean/run/nat_bug5.lean | 4927a318f10a4c6374faa71f7c3c69c0cf075838 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,393 | lean | import logic num
using num eq_proofs
inductive nat : Type :=
| zero : nat
| succ : nat → nat
definition add (x y : nat) : nat := nat_rec x (λn r, succ r) y
infixl `+`:65 := add
definition mul (n m : nat) := nat_rec zero (fun m x, x + n) m
infixl `*`:75 := mul
axiom add_one (n:nat) : n + (succ zero) = succ n
axiom mul_zero_right (n : nat) : n * zero = zero
axiom add_zero_right (n : nat) : n + zero = n
axiom mul_succ_right (n m : nat) : n * succ m = n * m + n
axiom add_assoc (n m k : nat) : (n + m) + k = n + (m + k)
axiom add_right_comm (n m k : nat) : n + m + k = n + k + m
axiom induction_on {P : nat → Prop} (a : nat) (H1 : P zero) (H2 : ∀ (n : nat) (IH : P n), P (succ n)) : P a
set_option unifier.max_steps 50000
theorem mul_add_distr_left (n m k : nat) : (n + m) * k = n * k + m * k
:= induction_on k
(calc
(n + m) * zero = zero : refl _
... = n * zero + m * zero : refl _)
(take l IH,
calc
(n + m) * succ l = (n + m) * l + (n + m) : mul_succ_right _ _
... = n * l + m * l + (n + m) : {IH}
... = n * l + m * l + n + m : symm (add_assoc _ _ _)
... = n * l + n + m * l + m : {add_right_comm _ _ _}
... = n * l + n + (m * l + m) : add_assoc _ _ _
... = n * succ l + (m * l + m) : {symm (mul_succ_right _ _)}
... = n * succ l + m * succ l : {symm (mul_succ_right _ _)})
|
d9ec8701d7ae63dfbcb34b5b3e7a7417add8d876 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/ring_theory/matrix_algebra.lean | 13d9febcf028405b213624d141b06b326e1100b7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,085 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.matrix.basis
import ring_theory.tensor_product
/-!
We show `matrix n n A ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] matrix n n R)`.
-/
universes u v w
open_locale tensor_product
open_locale big_operators
open tensor_product
open algebra.tensor_product
open matrix
variables {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R]
variables {A : Type v} [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {n : Type w}
variables (R A n)
namespace matrix_equiv_tensor
/--
(Implementation detail).
The bare function underlying `(A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) →ₐ[R] matrix n n A`, on pure tensors.
-/
def to_fun (a : A) (m : matrix n n R) : matrix n n A :=
λ i j, a * algebra_map R A (m i j)
/--
(Implementation detail).
The function underlying `(A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) →ₐ[R] matrix n n A`,
as an `R`-linear map in the second tensor factor.
-/
def to_fun_right_linear (a : A) : matrix n n R →ₗ[R] matrix n n A :=
{ to_fun := to_fun R A n a,
map_add' := λ x y, by { dsimp only [to_fun], ext, simp [mul_add], },
map_smul' := λ r x,
begin
dsimp only [to_fun],
ext,
simp only [pi.smul_apply, ring_hom.map_mul, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul],
dsimp,
rw [algebra.smul_def r, ←_root_.mul_assoc, ←_root_.mul_assoc, algebra.commutes],
end, }
/--
(Implementation detail).
The function underlying `(A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) →ₐ[R] matrix n n A`,
as an `R`-bilinear map.
-/
def to_fun_bilinear : A →ₗ[R] matrix n n R →ₗ[R] matrix n n A :=
{ to_fun := to_fun_right_linear R A n,
map_add' := λ x y, by { ext, simp [to_fun_right_linear, to_fun, add_mul], },
map_smul' := λ r x, by { ext, simp [to_fun_right_linear, to_fun] }, }
/--
(Implementation detail).
The function underlying `(A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) →ₐ[R] matrix n n A`,
as an `R`-linear map.
-/
def to_fun_linear : A ⊗[R] matrix n n R →ₗ[R] matrix n n A :=
tensor_product.lift (to_fun_bilinear R A n)
variables [decidable_eq n] [fintype n]
/--
The function `(A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) →ₐ[R] matrix n n A`, as an algebra homomorphism.
-/
def to_fun_alg_hom : (A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) →ₐ[R] matrix n n A :=
alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product
(to_fun_linear R A n)
begin
intros, ext,
simp_rw [to_fun_linear, to_fun_bilinear, lift.tmul],
dsimp,
simp_rw [to_fun_right_linear],
dsimp,
simp_rw [to_fun, matrix.mul_mul_left, pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, matrix.mul_apply,
←_root_.mul_assoc _ a₂ _, algebra.commutes, _root_.mul_assoc a₂ _ _, ←finset.mul_sum,
ring_hom.map_sum, ring_hom.map_mul, _root_.mul_assoc],
end
begin
intros, ext,
simp only [to_fun_linear, to_fun_bilinear, to_fun_right_linear, to_fun, matrix.one_apply,
algebra_map_matrix_apply, lift.tmul, linear_map.coe_mk],
split_ifs; simp,
end
@[simp] lemma to_fun_alg_hom_apply (a : A) (m : matrix n n R) :
to_fun_alg_hom R A n (a ⊗ₜ m) = λ i j, a * algebra_map R A (m i j) :=
begin
simp [to_fun_alg_hom, alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product, to_fun_linear],
refl,
end
/--
(Implementation detail.)
The bare function `matrix n n A → A ⊗[R] matrix n n R`.
(We don't need to show that it's an algebra map, thankfully --- just that it's an inverse.)
-/
def inv_fun (M : matrix n n A) : A ⊗[R] matrix n n R :=
∑ (p : n × n), M p.1 p.2 ⊗ₜ (std_basis_matrix p.1 p.2 1)
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_zero : inv_fun R A n 0 = 0 :=
by simp [inv_fun]
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_add (M N : matrix n n A) :
inv_fun R A n (M + N) = inv_fun R A n M + inv_fun R A n N :=
by simp [inv_fun, add_tmul, finset.sum_add_distrib]
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_smul (a : A) (M : matrix n n A) :
inv_fun R A n (λ i j, a * M i j) = (a ⊗ₜ 1) * inv_fun R A n M :=
by simp [inv_fun,finset.mul_sum]
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_algebra_map (M : matrix n n R) :
inv_fun R A n (λ i j, algebra_map R A (M i j)) = 1 ⊗ₜ M :=
begin
dsimp [inv_fun],
simp only [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, smul_tmul, ←tmul_sum, mul_boole],
congr,
conv_rhs {rw matrix_eq_sum_std_basis M},
convert finset.sum_product, simp,
end
lemma right_inv (M : matrix n n A) : (to_fun_alg_hom R A n) (inv_fun R A n M) = M :=
begin
simp only [inv_fun, alg_hom.map_sum, std_basis_matrix, apply_ite ⇑(algebra_map R A),
mul_boole, to_fun_alg_hom_apply, ring_hom.map_zero, ring_hom.map_one],
convert finset.sum_product, apply matrix_eq_sum_std_basis,
end
lemma left_inv (M : A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) : inv_fun R A n (to_fun_alg_hom R A n M) = M :=
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on M,
{ simp, },
{ intros a m, simp, },
{ intros x y hx hy, simp [alg_hom.map_sum, hx, hy], },
end
/--
(Implementation detail)
The equivalence, ignoring the algebra structure, `(A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) ≃ matrix n n A`.
-/
def equiv : (A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) ≃ matrix n n A :=
{ to_fun := to_fun_alg_hom R A n,
inv_fun := inv_fun R A n,
left_inv := left_inv R A n,
right_inv := right_inv R A n, }
end matrix_equiv_tensor
variables [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
/--
The `R`-algebra isomorphism `matrix n n A ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] matrix n n R)`.
-/
def matrix_equiv_tensor : matrix n n A ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] matrix n n R) :=
alg_equiv.symm { ..(matrix_equiv_tensor.to_fun_alg_hom R A n), ..(matrix_equiv_tensor.equiv R A n) }
open matrix_equiv_tensor
@[simp] lemma matrix_equiv_tensor_apply (M : matrix n n A) :
matrix_equiv_tensor R A n M =
∑ (p : n × n), M p.1 p.2 ⊗ₜ (std_basis_matrix p.1 p.2 1) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix_equiv_tensor_apply_std_basis (i j : n) (x : A):
matrix_equiv_tensor R A n (std_basis_matrix i j x) =
x ⊗ₜ (std_basis_matrix i j 1) :=
begin
have t : ∀ (p : n × n), (i = p.1 ∧ j = p.2) ↔ (p = (i, j)) := by tidy,
simp [ite_tmul, t, std_basis_matrix],
end
@[simp] lemma matrix_equiv_tensor_apply_symm (a : A) (M : matrix n n R) :
(matrix_equiv_tensor R A n).symm (a ⊗ₜ M) =
λ i j, a * algebra_map R A (M i j) :=
begin
simp [matrix_equiv_tensor, to_fun_alg_hom, alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product, to_fun_linear],
refl,
end
|
0fc004ea5208b2f446e6c5643ce68819719c7244 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/ctxopt.lean | fee9de0b61100b7c62bbf3458e8afeaef9d9b4ae | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 80 | lean | --
section
set_option pp.implicit true
#check id true
end
#check id true
|
a59459244e6176201c694ef2a448dfe7c3f5c9c2 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/data/fin_enum.lean | ef23e23a864668bea92d1fae118c4a44e1b16ca6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,016 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author(s): Simon Hudon
-/
import category.monad.basic
import data.list.basic
import data.equiv.basic
import data.finset
import data.fintype.basic
/-!
Type class for finitely enumerable types. The property is stronger
than `fintype` in that it assigns each element a rank in a finite
enumeration.
-/
open finset (hiding singleton)
/-- `fin_enum α` means that `α` is finite and can be enumerated in some order,
i.e. `α` has an explicit bijection with `fin n` for some n. -/
class fin_enum (α : Sort*) :=
(card : ℕ)
(equiv [] : α ≃ fin card)
[dec_eq : decidable_eq α]
attribute [instance, priority 100] fin_enum.dec_eq
namespace fin_enum
variables {α : Type*}
/-- transport a `fin_enum` instance across an equivalence -/
def of_equiv (α) {β} [fin_enum α] (h : β ≃ α) : fin_enum β :=
{ card := card α,
equiv := h.trans (equiv α),
dec_eq := equiv.decidable_eq_of_equiv (h.trans (equiv _)) }
/-- create a `fin_enum` instance from an exhaustive list without duplicates -/
def of_nodup_list [decidable_eq α] (xs : list α) (h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ xs) (h' : list.nodup xs) : fin_enum α :=
{ card := xs.length,
equiv := ⟨λ x, ⟨xs.index_of x,by rw [list.index_of_lt_length]; apply h⟩,
λ ⟨i,h⟩, xs.nth_le _ h,
λ x, by simp [of_nodup_list._match_1],
λ ⟨i,h⟩, by simp [of_nodup_list._match_1,*]; rw list.nth_le_index_of; apply list.nodup_erase_dup ⟩ }
/-- create a `fin_enum` instance from an exhaustive list; duplicates are removed -/
def of_list [decidable_eq α] (xs : list α) (h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ xs) : fin_enum α :=
of_nodup_list xs.erase_dup (by simp *) (list.nodup_erase_dup _)
/-- create an exhaustive list of the values of a given type -/
def to_list (α) [fin_enum α] : list α :=
(list.fin_range (card α)).map (equiv α).symm
open function
@[simp] lemma mem_to_list [fin_enum α] (x : α) : x ∈ to_list α :=
by simp [to_list]; existsi equiv α x; simp
@[simp] lemma nodup_to_list [fin_enum α] : list.nodup (to_list α) :=
by simp [to_list]; apply list.nodup_map; [apply equiv.injective, apply list.nodup_fin_range]
/-- create a `fin_enum` instance using a surjection -/
def of_surjective {β} (f : β → α) [decidable_eq α] [fin_enum β] (h : surjective f) : fin_enum α :=
of_list ((to_list β).map f) (by intro; simp; exact h _)
/-- create a `fin_enum` instance using an injection -/
noncomputable def of_injective {α β} (f : α → β) [decidable_eq α] [fin_enum β] (h : injective f) : fin_enum α :=
of_list ((to_list β).filter_map (partial_inv f))
begin
intro x,
simp only [mem_to_list, true_and, list.mem_filter_map],
use f x,
simp only [h, function.partial_inv_left],
end
instance pempty : fin_enum pempty :=
of_list [] (λ x, pempty.elim x)
instance empty : fin_enum empty :=
of_list [] (λ x, empty.elim x)
instance punit : fin_enum punit :=
of_list [punit.star] (λ x, by cases x; simp)
instance prod {β} [fin_enum α] [fin_enum β] : fin_enum (α × β) :=
of_list ( (to_list α).product (to_list β) ) (λ x, by cases x; simp)
instance sum {β} [fin_enum α] [fin_enum β] : fin_enum (α ⊕ β) :=
of_list ( (to_list α).map sum.inl ++ (to_list β).map sum.inr ) (λ x, by cases x; simp)
instance fin {n} : fin_enum (fin n) :=
of_list (list.fin_range _) (by simp)
instance quotient.enum [fin_enum α] (s : setoid α)
[decidable_rel ((≈) : α → α → Prop)] : fin_enum (quotient s) :=
fin_enum.of_surjective quotient.mk (λ x, quotient.induction_on x (λ x, ⟨x, rfl⟩))
/-- enumerate all finite sets of a given type -/
def finset.enum [decidable_eq α] : list α → list (finset α)
| [] := [∅]
| (x :: xs) :=
do r ← finset.enum xs,
[r,{x} ∪ r]
@[simp] lemma finset.mem_enum [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (xs : list α) : s ∈ finset.enum xs ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ∈ xs :=
begin
induction xs generalizing s; simp [*,finset.enum],
{ simp [finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,(∉)], refl },
{ split, rintro ⟨a,h,h'⟩ x hx,
cases h',
{ right, apply h, subst a, exact hx, },
{ simp only [h', mem_union, mem_singleton] at hx ⊢, cases hx,
{ exact or.inl hx },
{ exact or.inr (h _ hx) } },
intro h, existsi s \ ({xs_hd} : finset α),
simp only [and_imp, union_comm, mem_sdiff, insert_empty_eq_singleton, mem_singleton],
simp only [or_iff_not_imp_left] at h,
existsi h,
by_cases xs_hd ∈ s,
{ have : finset.singleton xs_hd ⊆ s, simp only [has_subset.subset, *, forall_eq, mem_singleton],
simp only [union_sdiff_of_subset this, or_true, finset.union_sdiff_of_subset, eq_self_iff_true], },
{ left, symmetry, simp only [sdiff_eq_self],
intro a, simp only [and_imp, mem_inter, mem_singleton, not_mem_empty],
intros h₀ h₁, subst a, apply h h₀, } }
end
instance finset.fin_enum [fin_enum α] : fin_enum (finset α) :=
of_list (finset.enum (to_list α)) (by intro; simp)
instance subtype.fin_enum [fin_enum α] (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : fin_enum {x // p x} :=
of_list ((to_list α).filter_map $ λ x, if h : p x then some ⟨_,h⟩ else none) (by rintro ⟨x,h⟩; simp; existsi x; simp *)
instance (β : α → Type*)
[fin_enum α] [∀ a, fin_enum (β a)] : fin_enum (sigma β) :=
of_list
((to_list α).bind $ λ a, (to_list (β a)).map $ sigma.mk a)
(by intro x; cases x; simp)
instance psigma.fin_enum {β : α → Type*} [fin_enum α] [∀ a, fin_enum (β a)] :
fin_enum (Σ' a, β a) :=
fin_enum.of_equiv _ (equiv.psigma_equiv_sigma _)
instance psigma.fin_enum_prop_left {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, fin_enum (β a)] [decidable α] :
fin_enum (Σ' a, β a) :=
if h : α then of_list ((to_list (β h)).map $ psigma.mk h) (λ ⟨a,Ba⟩, by simp)
else of_list [] (λ ⟨a,Ba⟩, (h a).elim)
instance psigma.fin_enum_prop_right {β : α → Prop} [fin_enum α] [∀ a, decidable (β a)] :
fin_enum (Σ' a, β a) :=
fin_enum.of_equiv {a // β a} ⟨λ ⟨x, y⟩, ⟨x, y⟩, λ ⟨x, y⟩, ⟨x, y⟩, λ ⟨x, y⟩, rfl, λ ⟨x, y⟩, rfl⟩
instance psigma.fin_enum_prop_prop {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [decidable α] [∀ a, decidable (β a)] :
fin_enum (Σ' a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a
then of_list [⟨h.fst,h.snd⟩] (by rintro ⟨⟩; simp)
else of_list [] (λ a, (h ⟨a.fst,a.snd⟩).elim)
@[priority 100]
instance [fin_enum α] : fintype α :=
{ elems := univ.map (equiv α).symm.to_embedding,
complete := by intros; simp; existsi (equiv α x); simp }
/-- For `pi.cons x xs y f` create a function where every `i ∈ xs` is mapped to `f i` and
`x` is mapped to `y` -/
def pi.cons {β : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] (x : α) (xs : list α) (y : β x)
(f : Π a, a ∈ xs → β a) :
Π a, a ∈ (x :: xs : list α) → β a
| b h :=
if h' : b = x then cast (by rw h') y
else f b (list.mem_of_ne_of_mem h' h)
/-- Given `f` a function whose domain is `x :: xs`, produce a function whose domain
is restricted to `xs`. -/
def pi.tail {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {x : α} {xs : list α}
(f : Π a, a ∈ (x :: xs : list α) → β a) :
Π a, a ∈ xs → β a
| a h := f a (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- `pi xs f` creates the list of functions `g` such that, for `x ∈ xs`, `g x ∈ f x` -/
def pi {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] : Π xs : list α, (Π a, list (β a)) → list (Π a, a ∈ xs → β a)
| [] fs := [λ x h, h.elim]
| (x :: xs) fs :=
fin_enum.pi.cons x xs <$> fs x <*> pi xs fs
lemma mem_pi {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [fin_enum α] [∀a, fin_enum (β a)] (xs : list α) (f : Π a, a ∈ xs → β a) :
f ∈ pi xs (λ x, to_list (β x)) :=
begin
induction xs; simp [pi,-list.map_eq_map] with monad_norm functor_norm,
{ ext a ⟨ ⟩ },
{ existsi pi.cons xs_hd xs_tl (f _ (list.mem_cons_self _ _)),
split, exact ⟨_,rfl⟩,
existsi pi.tail f, split,
{ apply xs_ih, },
{ ext x h, simp [pi.cons], split_ifs, subst x, refl, refl }, }
end
/-- enumerate all functions whose domain and range are finitely enumerable -/
def pi.enum {α : Type*} (β : α → Type*) [fin_enum α] [∀a, fin_enum (β a)] : list (Π a, β a) :=
(pi (to_list α) (λ x, to_list (β x))).map (λ f x, f x (mem_to_list _))
lemma pi.mem_enum {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [fin_enum α] [∀a, fin_enum (β a)] (f : Π a, β a) : f ∈ pi.enum β :=
by simp [pi.enum]; refine ⟨λ a h, f a, mem_pi _ _, rfl⟩
instance pi.fin_enum {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[fin_enum α] [∀a, fin_enum (β a)] : fin_enum (Πa, β a) :=
of_list (pi.enum _) (λ x, pi.mem_enum _)
instance pfun_fin_enum (p : Prop) [decidable p] (α : p → Type*)
[Π hp, fin_enum (α hp)] : fin_enum (Π hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then of_list ( (to_list (α hp)).map $ λ x hp', x ) (by intro; simp; exact ⟨x hp,rfl⟩)
else of_list [λ hp', (hp hp').elim] (by intro; simp; ext hp'; cases hp hp')
end fin_enum
|
88e54cd740de96939bc722a4c5275fa5345d4c32 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/run/back1.lean | 73722b941c2faa09ec14de477fc51a4dab7644ad | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,740 | lean | /- In this example, we show how to write a simple tactic for performing
backward chaining.
The tactic builds list membership proofs for goals such as
a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, a, b]
-/
open list expr tactic
universe variable u
/- The tactic uses the following 4 theorems from the standard library.
Here, we just give them shorter names, and state their types. -/
lemma in_tail {α : Type u} {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l → a ∈ b::l :=
mem_cons_of_mem _
lemma in_head {α : Type u} {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ a::l :=
mem_cons_self _ _
lemma in_left {α : Type u} {a : α} {l : list α} (r : list α) : a ∈ l → a ∈ l ++ r :=
mem_append_left _
lemma in_right {α : Type u} {a : α} (l : list α) {r : list α} : a ∈ r → a ∈ l ++ r :=
mem_append_right _
/- Now, we define two helper tactics for matching cons/append-applications.
For example, (match_cons e) succeeds and return a pair (h, t) iff
it is of the form (h::t).
-/
meta def match_cons (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
/- The tactic (match_app_of e `list.cons) succeeds if e is a list-cons application,
and returns a list of arguments.
The notation `list.cons is a "name quotation".
It is a shorthand for
(name.mk_string "cons" (name.mk_string "list" name.anonymous))
We can pattern match in the do-notation. This definition is equivalent to
do args ← match_app_of e `list.cons,
match args with
| [_, h, t] := return (h, t)
| _ := failed
end
It is quite convenient when we have many nested patterns.
-/
do [_, h, t] ← match_app_of e `list.cons | failed, return (h, t)
meta def match_append (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do [_, _, l, r] ← match_app_of e `has_append.append | failed, return (l, r)
/- The tactic (search_mem_list a e) tries to build a proof-term for (a ∈ e). -/
meta def search_mem_list : expr → expr → tactic expr
| a e :=
/- First, we check if there is an assumption with type (a ∈ e).
We use the helper tactic mk_app. It infers implicit arguments using type inference and
type class resolution. Note that the type of mem is:
Π {α : Type u₁} {γ : Type u₁ → Type u₂} [s : has_mem α γ], α → γ α → Prop
It has 2 universe variables and 3 implicit arguments, where one of them is a type class instance.
So, it is quite inconvenient to create mem-applications by hand. The tactic mk_app
hides this complexity.
The tactic (find_assumption m) succeeds if there is a hypothesis (h : m) in
the local context of the main goal. It is implemented in Lean, and we can
jump to its definition by using `M-.` (on Emacs) and `F12` (on VS Code).
On VS Code, we can also "peek" on its definition by typing (Alt-F12).
-/
(do m ← mk_app `has_mem.mem [a, e], find_assumption m)
<|>
/- If e is of the form l++r, then we try to build a proof for (a ∈ l),
if we succeed, we built a proof for (a ∈ l++r) using the lemma in_left. -/
(do (l, r) ← match_append e, h ← search_mem_list a l, mk_app `in_left [l, r, h])
<|>
(do (l, r) ← match_append e, h ← search_mem_list a r, mk_app `in_right [l, r, h])
<|>
(do (b, t) ← match_cons e, is_def_eq a b, mk_app `in_head [b, t])
<|>
(do (b, t) ← match_cons e, h ← search_mem_list a t, mk_app `in_tail [a, b, t, h])
/- The tactic mk_mem_list tries to close the current goal using search_mem_list
if it is of the form (a ∈ e).
We can view mk_mem_list as an "overloaded lemma" as described by Gonthier et al.
in the paper "How to make ad hoc proof automation less ad hoc"
-/
meta def mk_mem_list : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
[_, _, _, a, e] ← match_app_of t `has_mem.mem | failed,
search_mem_list a e >>= exact
example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, a, b] :=
by mk_mem_list
example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, a+0, b] :=
by mk_mem_list
example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, c, c] ++ [b, a+0, b] :=
by mk_mem_list
example (a b c : nat) (l : list nat) : a ∈ l → a ∈ [b, c] ++ b::l :=
by tactic.intros >> mk_mem_list
example (a b c : nat) (l : list nat) : a ∈ l → a ∈ b::b::c::l ++ [c, c, b] :=
by tactic.intros >> mk_mem_list
/- We can use mk_mem_list nested in our proofs -/
example (a b c : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list nat) : (a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂) → a ∈ b::l₂ ∨ a ∈ b::c::l₁ ++ [b, c]
| (or.inl h) := or.inr (by mk_mem_list)
| (or.inr r) := or.inl (by mk_mem_list)
/- We can prove the same theorem using just tactics. -/
example (a b c : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list nat) : (a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂) → a ∈ b::l₂ ∨ a ∈ b::c::l₁ ++ [b, c] :=
begin
intro h, cases h,
{apply or.inr, mk_mem_list},
{apply or.inl, mk_mem_list}
end
|
08bef1a3522f2661198ae84bd759119ece1723f8 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/order/conditionally_complete_lattice.lean | a5b6b54e5dbe30e2d25ae5955d2a961b8389c601 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 43,947 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import data.nat.enat
import data.set.intervals.ord_connected
/-!
# Theory of conditionally complete lattices.
A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which every non-empty bounded subset s
has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, denoted below by Sup s and Inf s.
Typical examples are real, nat, int with their usual orders.
The theory is very comparable to the theory of complete lattices, except that suitable
boundedness and nonemptiness assumptions have to be added to most statements.
We introduce two predicates bdd_above and bdd_below to express this boundedness, prove
their basic properties, and then go on to prove most useful properties of Sup and Inf
in conditionally complete lattices.
To differentiate the statements between complete lattices and conditionally complete
lattices, we prefix Inf and Sup in the statements by c, giving cInf and cSup. For instance,
Inf_le is a statement in complete lattices ensuring Inf s ≤ x, while cInf_le is the same
statement in conditionally complete lattices with an additional assumption that s is
bounded below.
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open set
variables {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section
/-!
Extension of Sup and Inf from a preorder `α` to `with_top α` and `with_bot α`
-/
open_locale classical
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [preorder α] [has_Sup α] : has_Sup (with_top α) :=
⟨λ S, if ⊤ ∈ S then ⊤ else
if bdd_above (coe ⁻¹' S : set α) then ↑(Sup (coe ⁻¹' S : set α)) else ⊤⟩
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] : has_Inf (with_top α) :=
⟨λ S, if S ⊆ {⊤} then ⊤ else ↑(Inf (coe ⁻¹' S : set α))⟩
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] : has_Sup (with_bot α) :=
⟨(@with_top.has_Inf (order_dual α) _).Inf⟩
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [preorder α] [has_Inf α] : has_Inf (with_bot α) :=
⟨(@with_top.has_Sup (order_dual α) _ _).Sup⟩
@[simp]
theorem with_top.cInf_empty {α : Type*} [has_Inf α] : Inf (∅ : set (with_top α)) = ⊤ :=
if_pos $ set.empty_subset _
@[simp]
theorem with_bot.cSup_empty {α : Type*} [has_Sup α] : Sup (∅ : set (with_bot α)) = ⊥ :=
if_pos $ set.empty_subset _
end -- section
/-- A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which
every nonempty subset which is bounded above has a supremum, and
every nonempty subset which is bounded below has an infimum.
Typical examples are real numbers or natural numbers.
To differentiate the statements from the corresponding statements in (unconditional)
complete lattices, we prefix Inf and Sup by a c everywhere. The same statements should
hold in both worlds, sometimes with additional assumptions of nonemptiness or
boundedness.-/
class conditionally_complete_lattice (α : Type*) extends lattice α, has_Sup α, has_Inf α :=
(le_cSup : ∀s a, bdd_above s → a ∈ s → a ≤ Sup s)
(cSup_le : ∀ s a, set.nonempty s → a ∈ upper_bounds s → Sup s ≤ a)
(cInf_le : ∀s a, bdd_below s → a ∈ s → Inf s ≤ a)
(le_cInf : ∀s a, set.nonempty s → a ∈ lower_bounds s → a ≤ Inf s)
/-- A conditionally complete linear order is a linear order in which
every nonempty subset which is bounded above has a supremum, and
every nonempty subset which is bounded below has an infimum.
Typical examples are real numbers or natural numbers.
To differentiate the statements from the corresponding statements in (unconditional)
complete linear orders, we prefix Inf and Sup by a c everywhere. The same statements should
hold in both worlds, sometimes with additional assumptions of nonemptiness or
boundedness.-/
class conditionally_complete_linear_order (α : Type*)
extends conditionally_complete_lattice α, linear_order α
/-- A conditionally complete linear order with `bot` is a linear order with least element, in which
every nonempty subset which is bounded above has a supremum, and every nonempty subset (necessarily
bounded below) has an infimum. A typical example is the natural numbers.
To differentiate the statements from the corresponding statements in (unconditional)
complete linear orders, we prefix Inf and Sup by a c everywhere. The same statements should
hold in both worlds, sometimes with additional assumptions of nonemptiness or
boundedness.-/
class conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot (α : Type*)
extends conditionally_complete_linear_order α, order_bot α :=
(cSup_empty : Sup ∅ = ⊥)
/- A complete lattice is a conditionally complete lattice, as there are no restrictions
on the properties of Inf and Sup in a complete lattice.-/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance conditionally_complete_lattice_of_complete_lattice [complete_lattice α]:
conditionally_complete_lattice α :=
{ le_cSup := by intros; apply le_Sup; assumption,
cSup_le := by intros; apply Sup_le; assumption,
cInf_le := by intros; apply Inf_le; assumption,
le_cInf := by intros; apply le_Inf; assumption,
..‹complete_lattice α› }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance conditionally_complete_linear_order_of_complete_linear_order [complete_linear_order α]:
conditionally_complete_linear_order α :=
{ ..conditionally_complete_lattice_of_complete_lattice, .. ‹complete_linear_order α› }
section order_dual
instance (α : Type*) [conditionally_complete_lattice α] :
conditionally_complete_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ le_cSup := @conditionally_complete_lattice.cInf_le α _,
cSup_le := @conditionally_complete_lattice.le_cInf α _,
le_cInf := @conditionally_complete_lattice.cSup_le α _,
cInf_le := @conditionally_complete_lattice.le_cSup α _,
..order_dual.has_Inf α,
..order_dual.has_Sup α,
..order_dual.lattice α }
instance (α : Type*) [conditionally_complete_linear_order α] :
conditionally_complete_linear_order (order_dual α) :=
{ ..order_dual.conditionally_complete_lattice α,
..order_dual.linear_order α }
end order_dual
section conditionally_complete_lattice
variables [conditionally_complete_lattice α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_cSup (h₁ : bdd_above s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : a ≤ Sup s :=
conditionally_complete_lattice.le_cSup s a h₁ h₂
theorem cSup_le (h₁ : s.nonempty) (h₂ : ∀b∈s, b ≤ a) : Sup s ≤ a :=
conditionally_complete_lattice.cSup_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem cInf_le (h₁ : bdd_below s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : Inf s ≤ a :=
conditionally_complete_lattice.cInf_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_cInf (h₁ : s.nonempty) (h₂ : ∀b∈s, a ≤ b) : a ≤ Inf s :=
conditionally_complete_lattice.le_cInf s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_cSup_of_le (_ : bdd_above s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ Sup s :=
le_trans h (le_cSup ‹bdd_above s› hb)
theorem cInf_le_of_le (_ : bdd_below s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : Inf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (cInf_le ‹bdd_below s› hb) h
theorem cSup_le_cSup (_ : bdd_above t) (_ : s.nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
cSup_le ‹_› (assume (a) (ha : a ∈ s), le_cSup ‹bdd_above t› (h ha))
theorem cInf_le_cInf (_ : bdd_below t) (_ : s.nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
le_cInf ‹_› (assume (a) (ha : a ∈ s), cInf_le ‹bdd_below t› (h ha))
lemma is_lub_cSup (ne : s.nonempty) (H : bdd_above s) : is_lub s (Sup s) :=
⟨assume x, le_cSup H, assume x, cSup_le ne⟩
lemma is_glb_cInf (ne : s.nonempty) (H : bdd_below s) : is_glb s (Inf s) :=
⟨assume x, cInf_le H, assume x, le_cInf ne⟩
lemma is_lub.cSup_eq (H : is_lub s a) (ne : s.nonempty) : Sup s = a :=
(is_lub_cSup ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A greatest element of a set is the supremum of this set. -/
lemma is_greatest.cSup_eq (H : is_greatest s a) : Sup s = a :=
H.is_lub.cSup_eq H.nonempty
lemma is_glb.cInf_eq (H : is_glb s a) (ne : s.nonempty) : Inf s = a :=
(is_glb_cInf ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A least element of a set is the infimum of this set. -/
lemma is_least.cInf_eq (H : is_least s a) : Inf s = a :=
H.is_glb.cInf_eq H.nonempty
lemma subset_Icc_cInf_cSup (hb : bdd_below s) (ha : bdd_above s) :
s ⊆ Icc (Inf s) (Sup s) :=
λ x hx, ⟨cInf_le hb hx, le_cSup ha hx⟩
theorem cSup_le_iff (hb : bdd_above s) (ne : s.nonempty) : Sup s ≤ a ↔ (∀b ∈ s, b ≤ a) :=
is_lub_le_iff (is_lub_cSup ne hb)
theorem le_cInf_iff (hb : bdd_below s) (ne : s.nonempty) : a ≤ Inf s ↔ (∀b ∈ s, a ≤ b) :=
le_is_glb_iff (is_glb_cInf ne hb)
lemma cSup_lower_bounds_eq_cInf {s : set α} (h : bdd_below s) (hs : s.nonempty) :
Sup (lower_bounds s) = Inf s :=
(is_lub_cSup h $ hs.mono $ λ x hx y hy, hy hx).unique (is_glb_cInf hs h).is_lub
lemma cInf_upper_bounds_eq_cSup {s : set α} (h : bdd_above s) (hs : s.nonempty) :
Inf (upper_bounds s) = Sup s :=
(is_glb_cInf h $ hs.mono $ λ x hx y hy, hy hx).unique (is_lub_cSup hs h).is_glb
/--Introduction rule to prove that b is the supremum of s: it suffices to check that b
is larger than all elements of s, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.-/
theorem cSup_intro (_ : s.nonempty) (_ : ∀a∈s, a ≤ b) (H : ∀w, w < b → (∃a∈s, w < a)) : Sup s = b :=
have bdd_above s := ⟨b, by assumption⟩,
have (Sup s < b) ∨ (Sup s = b) := lt_or_eq_of_le (cSup_le ‹_› ‹∀a∈s, a ≤ b›),
have ¬(Sup s < b) :=
assume: Sup s < b,
let ⟨a, _, _⟩ := (H (Sup s) ‹Sup s < b›) in /- a ∈ s, Sup s < a-/
have Sup s < Sup s := lt_of_lt_of_le ‹Sup s < a› (le_cSup ‹bdd_above s› ‹a ∈ s›),
show false, by finish [lt_irrefl (Sup s)],
show Sup s = b, by finish
/--Introduction rule to prove that b is the infimum of s: it suffices to check that b
is smaller than all elements of s, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.-/
theorem cInf_intro (_ : s.nonempty) (_ : ∀a∈s, b ≤ a) (H : ∀w, b < w → (∃a∈s, a < w)) : Inf s = b :=
@cSup_intro (order_dual α) _ _ _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
/--b < Sup s when there is an element a in s with b < a, when s is bounded above.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness above for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the complete_lattice case.-/
lemma lt_cSup_of_lt (_ : bdd_above s) (_ : a ∈ s) (_ : b < a) : b < Sup s :=
lt_of_lt_of_le ‹b < a› (le_cSup ‹bdd_above s› ‹a ∈ s›)
/--Inf s < b when there is an element a in s with a < b, when s is bounded below.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness below for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the complete_lattice case.-/
lemma cInf_lt_of_lt (_ : bdd_below s) (_ : a ∈ s) (_ : a < b) : Inf s < b :=
@lt_cSup_of_lt (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
/-- If all elements of a nonempty set `s` are less than or equal to all elements
of a nonempty set `t`, then there exists an element between these sets. -/
lemma exists_between_of_forall_le (sne : s.nonempty) (tne : t.nonempty)
(hst : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), x ≤ y) :
(upper_bounds s ∩ lower_bounds t).nonempty :=
⟨Inf t, λ x hx, le_cInf tne $ hst x hx, λ y hy, cInf_le (sne.mono hst) hy⟩
/--The supremum of a singleton is the element of the singleton-/
@[simp] theorem cSup_singleton (a : α) : Sup {a} = a :=
is_greatest_singleton.cSup_eq
/--The infimum of a singleton is the element of the singleton-/
@[simp] theorem cInf_singleton (a : α) : Inf {a} = a :=
is_least_singleton.cInf_eq
/--If a set is bounded below and above, and nonempty, its infimum is less than or equal to
its supremum.-/
theorem cInf_le_cSup (hb : bdd_below s) (ha : bdd_above s) (ne : s.nonempty) : Inf s ≤ Sup s :=
is_glb_le_is_lub (is_glb_cInf ne hb) (is_lub_cSup ne ha) ne
/--The sup of a union of two sets is the max of the suprema of each subset, under the assumptions
that all sets are bounded above and nonempty.-/
theorem cSup_union (hs : bdd_above s) (sne : s.nonempty) (ht : bdd_above t) (tne : t.nonempty) :
Sup (s ∪ t) = Sup s ⊔ Sup t :=
((is_lub_cSup sne hs).union (is_lub_cSup tne ht)).cSup_eq sne.inl
/--The inf of a union of two sets is the min of the infima of each subset, under the assumptions
that all sets are bounded below and nonempty.-/
theorem cInf_union (hs : bdd_below s) (sne : s.nonempty) (ht : bdd_below t) (tne : t.nonempty) :
Inf (s ∪ t) = Inf s ⊓ Inf t :=
@cSup_union (order_dual α) _ _ _ hs sne ht tne
/--The supremum of an intersection of two sets is bounded by the minimum of the suprema of each
set, if all sets are bounded above and nonempty.-/
theorem cSup_inter_le (_ : bdd_above s) (_ : bdd_above t) (hst : (s ∩ t).nonempty) :
Sup (s ∩ t) ≤ Sup s ⊓ Sup t :=
begin
apply cSup_le hst, simp only [le_inf_iff, and_imp, set.mem_inter_eq], intros b _ _, split,
apply le_cSup ‹bdd_above s› ‹b ∈ s›,
apply le_cSup ‹bdd_above t› ‹b ∈ t›
end
/--The infimum of an intersection of two sets is bounded below by the maximum of the
infima of each set, if all sets are bounded below and nonempty.-/
theorem le_cInf_inter (_ : bdd_below s) (_ : bdd_below t) (hst : (s ∩ t).nonempty) :
Inf s ⊔ Inf t ≤ Inf (s ∩ t) :=
@cSup_inter_le (order_dual α) _ _ _ ‹_› ‹_› hst
/-- The supremum of insert a s is the maximum of a and the supremum of s, if s is
nonempty and bounded above.-/
theorem cSup_insert (hs : bdd_above s) (sne : s.nonempty) : Sup (insert a s) = a ⊔ Sup s :=
((is_lub_cSup sne hs).insert a).cSup_eq (insert_nonempty a s)
/-- The infimum of insert a s is the minimum of a and the infimum of s, if s is
nonempty and bounded below.-/
theorem cInf_insert (hs : bdd_below s) (sne : s.nonempty) : Inf (insert a s) = a ⊓ Inf s :=
@cSup_insert (order_dual α) _ _ _ hs sne
@[simp] lemma cInf_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : Inf (Icc a b) = a :=
(is_glb_Icc h).cInf_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp] lemma cInf_Ici : Inf (Ici a) = a := is_least_Ici.cInf_eq
@[simp] lemma cInf_Ico (h : a < b) : Inf (Ico a b) = a :=
(is_glb_Ico h).cInf_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp] lemma cInf_Ioc [densely_ordered α] (h : a < b) : Inf (Ioc a b) = a :=
(is_glb_Ioc h).cInf_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp] lemma cInf_Ioi [no_top_order α] [densely_ordered α] : Inf (Ioi a) = a :=
cInf_intro nonempty_Ioi (λ _, le_of_lt) (λ w hw, by simpa using exists_between hw)
@[simp] lemma cInf_Ioo [densely_ordered α] (h : a < b) : Inf (Ioo a b) = a :=
(is_glb_Ioo h).cInf_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
@[simp] lemma cSup_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : Sup (Icc a b) = b :=
(is_lub_Icc h).cSup_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp] lemma cSup_Ico [densely_ordered α] (h : a < b) : Sup (Ico a b) = b :=
(is_lub_Ico h).cSup_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp] lemma cSup_Iic : Sup (Iic a) = a := is_greatest_Iic.cSup_eq
@[simp] lemma cSup_Iio [no_bot_order α] [densely_ordered α] : Sup (Iio a) = a :=
cSup_intro nonempty_Iio (λ _, le_of_lt) (λ w hw, by simpa [and_comm] using exists_between hw)
@[simp] lemma cSup_Ioc (h : a < b) : Sup (Ioc a b) = b :=
(is_lub_Ioc h).cSup_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp] lemma cSup_Ioo [densely_ordered α] (h : a < b) : Sup (Ioo a b) = b :=
(is_lub_Ioo h).cSup_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
/--The indexed supremum of two functions are comparable if the functions are pointwise comparable-/
lemma csupr_le_csupr {f g : ι → α} (B : bdd_above (range g)) (H : ∀x, f x ≤ g x) :
supr f ≤ supr g :=
begin
classical, by_cases hι : nonempty ι,
{ have Rf : (range f).nonempty, { exactI range_nonempty _ },
apply cSup_le Rf,
rintros y ⟨x, rfl⟩,
have : g x ∈ range g := ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact le_cSup_of_le B this (H x) },
{ have Rf : range f = ∅, from range_eq_empty.2 hι,
have Rg : range g = ∅, from range_eq_empty.2 hι,
unfold supr, rw [Rf, Rg] }
end
/--The indexed supremum of a function is bounded above by a uniform bound-/
lemma csupr_le [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {c : α} (H : ∀x, f x ≤ c) : supr f ≤ c :=
cSup_le (range_nonempty f) (by rwa forall_range_iff)
/--The indexed supremum of a function is bounded below by the value taken at one point-/
lemma le_csupr {f : ι → α} (H : bdd_above (range f)) (c : ι) : f c ≤ supr f :=
le_cSup H (mem_range_self _)
lemma le_csupr_of_le {f : ι → α} (H : bdd_above (range f)) (c : ι) (h : a ≤ f c) : a ≤ supr f :=
le_trans h (le_csupr H c)
/--The indexed infimum of two functions are comparable if the functions are pointwise comparable-/
lemma cinfi_le_cinfi {f g : ι → α} (B : bdd_below (range f)) (H : ∀x, f x ≤ g x) :
infi f ≤ infi g :=
@csupr_le_csupr (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ B H
/--The indexed minimum of a function is bounded below by a uniform lower bound-/
lemma le_cinfi [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {c : α} (H : ∀x, c ≤ f x) : c ≤ infi f :=
@csupr_le (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ H
/--The indexed infimum of a function is bounded above by the value taken at one point-/
lemma cinfi_le {f : ι → α} (H : bdd_below (range f)) (c : ι) : infi f ≤ f c :=
@le_csupr (order_dual α) _ _ _ H c
lemma cinfi_le_of_le {f : ι → α} (H : bdd_below (range f)) (c : ι) (h : f c ≤ a) : infi f ≤ a :=
@le_csupr_of_le (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ H c h
@[simp] theorem csupr_const [hι : nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨆ b:ι, a) = a :=
by rw [supr, range_const, cSup_singleton]
@[simp] theorem cinfi_const [hι : nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨅ b:ι, a) = a :=
@csupr_const (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
theorem supr_unique [unique ι] {s : ι → α} : (⨆ i, s i) = s (default ι) :=
have ∀ i, s i = s (default ι) := λ i, congr_arg s (unique.eq_default i),
by simp only [this, csupr_const]
theorem infi_unique [unique ι] {s : ι → α} : (⨅ i, s i) = s (default ι) :=
@supr_unique (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem supr_unit {f : unit → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = f () :=
by { convert supr_unique, apply_instance }
@[simp] theorem infi_unit {f : unit → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = f () :=
@supr_unit (order_dual α) _ _
@[simp] lemma csupr_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
by haveI := unique_prop hp; exact supr_unique
@[simp] lemma cinfi_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
@csupr_pos (order_dual α) _ _ _ hp
/-- Nested intervals lemma: if `f` is a monotonically increasing sequence, `g` is a monotonically
decreasing sequence, and `f n ≤ g n` for all `n`, then `⨆ n, f n` belongs to all the intervals
`[f n, g n]`. -/
lemma csupr_mem_Inter_Icc_of_mono_incr_of_mono_decr [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β]
{f g : β → α} (hf : monotone f) (hg : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m ≤ n → g n ≤ g m) (h : ∀ n, f n ≤ g n) :
(⨆ n, f n) ∈ ⋂ n, Icc (f n) (g n) :=
begin
inhabit β,
refine mem_Inter.2 (λ n, ⟨le_csupr ⟨g $ default β, forall_range_iff.2 $ λ m, _⟩ _,
csupr_le $ λ m, _⟩); exact forall_le_of_monotone_of_mono_decr hf hg h _ _
end
/-- Nested intervals lemma: if `[f n, g n]` is a monotonically decreasing sequence of nonempty
closed intervals, then `⨆ n, f n` belongs to all the intervals `[f n, g n]`. -/
lemma csupr_mem_Inter_Icc_of_mono_decr_Icc [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β]
{f g : β → α} (h : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m ≤ n → Icc (f n) (g n) ⊆ Icc (f m) (g m)) (h' : ∀ n, f n ≤ g n) :
(⨆ n, f n) ∈ ⋂ n, Icc (f n) (g n) :=
csupr_mem_Inter_Icc_of_mono_incr_of_mono_decr (λ m n hmn, ((Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h' n)).1 (h hmn)).1)
(λ m n hmn, ((Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h' n)).1 (h hmn)).2) h'
/-- Nested intervals lemma: if `[f n, g n]` is a monotonically decreasing sequence of nonempty
closed intervals, then `⨆ n, f n` belongs to all the intervals `[f n, g n]`. -/
lemma csupr_mem_Inter_Icc_of_mono_decr_Icc_nat
{f g : ℕ → α} (h : ∀ n, Icc (f (n + 1)) (g (n + 1)) ⊆ Icc (f n) (g n)) (h' : ∀ n, f n ≤ g n) :
(⨆ n, f n) ∈ ⋂ n, Icc (f n) (g n) :=
csupr_mem_Inter_Icc_of_mono_decr_Icc
(@monotone_of_monotone_nat (order_dual $ set α) _ (λ n, Icc (f n) (g n)) h) h'
end conditionally_complete_lattice
instance pi.conditionally_complete_lattice {ι : Type*} {α : Π i : ι, Type*}
[Π i, conditionally_complete_lattice (α i)] :
conditionally_complete_lattice (Π i, α i) :=
{ le_cSup := λ s f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i, le_cSup ⟨g i, set.forall_range_iff.2 $ λ ⟨f', hf'⟩, hg hf' i⟩
⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩,
cSup_le := λ s f hs hf i, cSup_le (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty) $
λ b ⟨⟨g, hg⟩, hb⟩, hb ▸ hf hg i,
cInf_le := λ s f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i, cInf_le ⟨g i, set.forall_range_iff.2 $ λ ⟨f', hf'⟩, hg hf' i⟩
⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩,
le_cInf := λ s f hs hf i, le_cInf (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty) $
λ b ⟨⟨g, hg⟩, hb⟩, hb ▸ hf hg i,
.. pi.lattice, .. pi.has_Sup, .. pi.has_Inf }
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
lemma set.nonempty.cSup_mem (h : s.nonempty) (hs : finite s) : Sup s ∈ s :=
begin
classical,
revert h,
apply finite.induction_on hs,
{ simp },
rintros a t hat t_fin ih -,
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ht,
{ simp },
{ rw cSup_insert t_fin.bdd_above ht,
by_cases ha : a ≤ Sup t,
{ simp [sup_eq_right.mpr ha, ih ht] },
{ simp only [sup_eq_left, mem_insert_iff, (not_le.mp ha).le, true_or] } }
end
lemma finset.nonempty.cSup_mem {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) : Sup (s : set α) ∈ s :=
set.nonempty.cSup_mem h s.finite_to_set
lemma set.nonempty.cInf_mem (h : s.nonempty) (hs : finite s) : Inf s ∈ s :=
@set.nonempty.cSup_mem (order_dual α) _ _ h hs
lemma finset.nonempty.cInf_mem {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) : Inf (s : set α) ∈ s :=
set.nonempty.cInf_mem h s.finite_to_set
/-- When b < Sup s, there is an element a in s with b < a, if s is nonempty and the order is
a linear order. -/
lemma exists_lt_of_lt_cSup (hs : s.nonempty) (hb : b < Sup s) : ∃a∈s, b < a :=
begin
classical, contrapose! hb,
exact cSup_le hs hb
end
/--
Indexed version of the above lemma `exists_lt_of_lt_cSup`.
When `b < supr f`, there is an element `i` such that `b < f i`.
-/
lemma exists_lt_of_lt_csupr [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} (h : b < supr f) :
∃i, b < f i :=
let ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, h⟩ := exists_lt_of_lt_cSup (range_nonempty f) h in ⟨i, h⟩
/--When Inf s < b, there is an element a in s with a < b, if s is nonempty and the order is
a linear order.-/
lemma exists_lt_of_cInf_lt (hs : s.nonempty) (hb : Inf s < b) : ∃a∈s, a < b :=
@exists_lt_of_lt_cSup (order_dual α) _ _ _ hs hb
/--
Indexed version of the above lemma `exists_lt_of_cInf_lt`
When `infi f < a`, there is an element `i` such that `f i < a`.
-/
lemma exists_lt_of_cinfi_lt [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} (h : infi f < a) :
(∃i, f i < a) :=
@exists_lt_of_lt_csupr (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
/--Introduction rule to prove that b is the supremum of s: it suffices to check that
1) b is an upper bound
2) every other upper bound b' satisfies b ≤ b'.-/
theorem cSup_intro' (_ : s.nonempty)
(h_is_ub : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b) (h_b_le_ub : ∀ub, (∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ ub) → (b ≤ ub)) : Sup s = b :=
le_antisymm
(show Sup s ≤ b, from cSup_le ‹s.nonempty› h_is_ub)
(show b ≤ Sup s, from h_b_le_ub _ $ assume a, le_cSup ⟨b, h_is_ub⟩)
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
section conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot α]
lemma cSup_empty : (Sup ∅ : α) = ⊥ :=
conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot.cSup_empty
@[simp] lemma csupr_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = ⊥ :=
begin
have : ¬nonempty p := by simp [hp],
rw [supr, range_eq_empty.mpr this, cSup_empty],
end
end conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot
namespace nat
open_locale classical
noncomputable instance : has_Inf ℕ :=
⟨λs, if h : ∃n, n ∈ s then @nat.find (λn, n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
noncomputable instance : has_Sup ℕ :=
⟨λs, if h : ∃n, ∀a∈s, a ≤ n then @nat.find (λn, ∀a∈s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
lemma Inf_def {s : set ℕ} (h : s.nonempty) : Inf s = @nat.find (λn, n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
lemma Sup_def {s : set ℕ} (h : ∃n, ∀a∈s, a ≤ n) :
Sup s = @nat.find (λn, ∀a∈s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
@[simp] lemma Inf_eq_zero {s : set ℕ} : Inf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ :=
begin
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s,
{ subst h, simp only [or_true, eq_self_iff_true, iff_true, Inf, has_Inf.Inf,
mem_empty_eq, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff] },
{ have := ne_empty_iff_nonempty.mpr h,
simp only [this, or_false, nat.Inf_def, h, nat.find_eq_zero] }
end
lemma Inf_mem {s : set ℕ} (h : s.nonempty) : Inf s ∈ s :=
by { rw [nat.Inf_def h], exact nat.find_spec h }
lemma not_mem_of_lt_Inf {s : set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m < Inf s) : m ∉ s :=
begin
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s,
{ subst h, apply not_mem_empty },
{ rw [nat.Inf_def h] at hm, exact nat.find_min h hm }
end
protected lemma Inf_le {s : set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m ∈ s) : Inf s ≤ m :=
by { rw [nat.Inf_def ⟨m, hm⟩], exact nat.find_min' ⟨m, hm⟩ hm }
lemma nonempty_of_pos_Inf {s : set ℕ} (h : 0 < Inf s) : s.nonempty :=
begin
by_contradiction contra, rw set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty at contra,
have h' : Inf s ≠ 0, { exact ne_of_gt h, }, apply h',
rw nat.Inf_eq_zero, right, assumption,
end
lemma nonempty_of_Inf_eq_succ {s : set ℕ} {k : ℕ} (h : Inf s = k + 1) : s.nonempty :=
nonempty_of_pos_Inf (h.symm ▸ (succ_pos k) : Inf s > 0)
lemma eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed {s : set ℕ} (hs : s.nonempty)
(hs' : ∀ (k₁ k₂ : ℕ), k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s) : s = Ici (Inf s) :=
ext (λ n, ⟨λ H, nat.Inf_le H, λ H, hs' (Inf s) n H (Inf_mem hs)⟩)
lemma Inf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff {s : set ℕ}
(hs : ∀ (k₁ k₂ : ℕ), k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s) (k : ℕ) :
Inf s = k + 1 ↔ k + 1 ∈ s ∧ k ∉ s :=
begin
split,
{ intro H,
rw [eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed (nonempty_of_Inf_eq_succ H) hs, H, mem_Ici, mem_Ici],
exact ⟨le_refl _, k.not_succ_le_self⟩, },
{ rintro ⟨H, H'⟩,
rw [Inf_def (⟨_, H⟩ : s.nonempty), find_eq_iff],
exact ⟨H, λ n hnk hns, H' $ hs n k (lt_succ_iff.mp hnk) hns⟩, },
end
/-- This instance is necessary, otherwise the lattice operations would be derived via
conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot and marked as noncomputable. -/
instance : lattice ℕ := lattice_of_linear_order
noncomputable instance : conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot ℕ :=
{ Sup := Sup, Inf := Inf,
le_cSup := assume s a hb ha, by rw [Sup_def hb]; revert a ha; exact @nat.find_spec _ _ hb,
cSup_le := assume s a hs ha, by rw [Sup_def ⟨a, ha⟩]; exact nat.find_min' _ ha,
le_cInf := assume s a hs hb,
by rw [Inf_def hs]; exact hb (@nat.find_spec (λn, n ∈ s) _ _),
cInf_le := assume s a hb ha, by rw [Inf_def ⟨a, ha⟩]; exact nat.find_min' _ ha,
cSup_empty :=
begin
simp only [Sup_def, set.mem_empty_eq, forall_const, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff,
exists_const],
apply bot_unique (nat.find_min' _ _),
trivial
end,
.. (infer_instance : order_bot ℕ), .. (lattice_of_linear_order : lattice ℕ),
.. (infer_instance : linear_order ℕ) }
end nat
namespace with_top
open_locale classical
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot α]
/-- The Sup of a non-empty set is its least upper bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
lemma is_lub_Sup' {β : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β]
{s : set (with_top β)} (hs : s.nonempty) : is_lub s (Sup s) :=
begin
split,
{ show ite _ _ _ ∈ _,
split_ifs,
{ intros _ _, exact le_top },
{ rintro (⟨⟩|a) ha,
{ contradiction },
apply some_le_some.2,
exact le_cSup h_1 ha },
{ intros _ _, exact le_top } },
{ show ite _ _ _ ∈ _,
split_ifs,
{ rintro (⟨⟩|a) ha,
{ exact _root_.le_refl _ },
{ exact false.elim (not_top_le_coe a (ha h)) } },
{ rintro (⟨⟩|b) hb,
{ exact le_top },
refine some_le_some.2 (cSup_le _ _),
{ rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩|b, hb⟩,
{ exact absurd hb h },
{ exact ⟨b, hb⟩ } },
{ intros a ha, exact some_le_some.1 (hb ha) } },
{ rintro (⟨⟩|b) hb,
{ exact _root_.le_refl _ },
{ exfalso, apply h_1, use b, intros a ha, exact some_le_some.1 (hb ha) } } }
end
lemma is_lub_Sup (s : set (with_top α)) : is_lub s (Sup s) :=
begin
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs hs,
{ rw hs,
show is_lub ∅ (ite _ _ _),
split_ifs,
{ cases h },
{ rw [preimage_empty, cSup_empty], exact is_lub_empty },
{ exfalso, apply h_1, use ⊥, rintro a ⟨⟩ } },
exact is_lub_Sup' hs,
end
/-- The Inf of a bounded-below set is its greatest lower bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
lemma is_glb_Inf' {β : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β]
{s : set (with_top β)} (hs : bdd_below s) : is_glb s (Inf s) :=
begin
split,
{ show ite _ _ _ ∈ _,
split_ifs,
{ intros a ha, exact top_le_iff.2 (set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (h ha)) },
{ rintro (⟨⟩|a) ha,
{ exact le_top },
refine some_le_some.2 (cInf_le _ ha),
rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩|b, hb⟩,
{ exfalso,
apply h,
intros c hc,
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ←top_le_iff],
exact hb hc },
use b,
intros c hc,
exact some_le_some.1 (hb hc) } },
{ show ite _ _ _ ∈ _,
split_ifs,
{ intros _ _, exact le_top },
{ rintro (⟨⟩|a) ha,
{ exfalso, apply h, intros b hb, exact set.mem_singleton_iff.2 (top_le_iff.1 (ha hb)) },
{ refine some_le_some.2 (le_cInf _ _),
{ classical, contrapose! h,
rintros (⟨⟩|a) ha,
{ exact mem_singleton ⊤ },
{ exact (h ⟨a, ha⟩).elim }},
{ intros b hb,
rw ←some_le_some,
exact ha hb } } } }
end
lemma is_glb_Inf (s : set (with_top α)) : is_glb s (Inf s) :=
begin
by_cases hs : bdd_below s,
{ exact is_glb_Inf' hs },
{ exfalso, apply hs, use ⊥, intros _ _, exact bot_le },
end
noncomputable instance : complete_linear_order (with_top α) :=
{ Sup := Sup, le_Sup := assume s, (is_lub_Sup s).1, Sup_le := assume s, (is_lub_Sup s).2,
Inf := Inf, le_Inf := assume s, (is_glb_Inf s).2, Inf_le := assume s, (is_glb_Inf s).1,
decidable_le := classical.dec_rel _,
.. with_top.linear_order, ..with_top.lattice, ..with_top.order_top, ..with_top.order_bot }
lemma coe_Sup {s : set α} (hb : bdd_above s) : (↑(Sup s) : with_top α) = (⨆a∈s, ↑a) :=
begin
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs hs,
{ rw [hs, cSup_empty], simp only [set.mem_empty_eq, supr_bot, supr_false], refl },
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine (coe_le_iff.2 $ assume b hb, cSup_le hs $ assume a has, coe_le_coe.1 $ hb ▸ _),
exact (le_supr_of_le a $ le_supr_of_le has $ _root_.le_refl _) },
{ exact (supr_le $ assume a, supr_le $ assume ha, coe_le_coe.2 $ le_cSup hb ha) }
end
lemma coe_Inf {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) : (↑(Inf s) : with_top α) = (⨅a∈s, ↑a) :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs in
have (⨅a∈s, ↑a : with_top α) ≤ x, from infi_le_of_le x $ infi_le_of_le hx $ _root_.le_refl _,
let ⟨r, r_eq, hr⟩ := le_coe_iff.1 this in
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume ha, coe_le_coe.2 $ cInf_le (order_bot.bdd_below s) ha)
begin
refine (r_eq.symm ▸ coe_le_coe.2 $ le_cInf hs $ assume a has, coe_le_coe.1 $ _),
refine (r_eq ▸ infi_le_of_le a _),
exact (infi_le_of_le has $ _root_.le_refl _),
end
end with_top
namespace enat
open_locale classical
noncomputable instance : complete_linear_order enat :=
{ Sup := λ s, with_top_equiv.symm $ Sup (with_top_equiv '' s),
Inf := λ s, with_top_equiv.symm $ Inf (with_top_equiv '' s),
le_Sup := by intros; rw ← with_top_equiv_le; simp; apply le_Sup _; simpa,
Inf_le := by intros; rw ← with_top_equiv_le; simp; apply Inf_le _; simpa,
Sup_le := begin
intros s a h1,
rw [← with_top_equiv_le, with_top_equiv.right_inverse_symm],
apply Sup_le _,
rintros b ⟨x, h2, rfl⟩,
rw with_top_equiv_le,
apply h1,
assumption
end,
le_Inf := begin
intros s a h1,
rw [← with_top_equiv_le, with_top_equiv.right_inverse_symm],
apply le_Inf _,
rintros b ⟨x, h2, rfl⟩,
rw with_top_equiv_le,
apply h1,
assumption
end,
..enat.linear_order,
..enat.bounded_lattice }
end enat
namespace monotone
variables [preorder α] [conditionally_complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (h_mono : monotone f)
/-! A monotone function into a conditionally complete lattice preserves the ordering properties of
`Sup` and `Inf`. -/
lemma le_cSup_image {s : set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : bdd_above s) :
f c ≤ Sup (f '' s) :=
le_cSup (map_bdd_above h_mono h_bdd) (mem_image_of_mem f hcs)
lemma cSup_image_le {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) {B : α} (hB: B ∈ upper_bounds s) :
Sup (f '' s) ≤ f B :=
cSup_le (nonempty.image f hs) (h_mono.mem_upper_bounds_image hB)
lemma cInf_image_le {s : set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : bdd_below s) :
Inf (f '' s) ≤ f c :=
@le_cSup_image (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ (λ x y hxy, h_mono hxy) _ _ hcs h_bdd
lemma le_cInf_image {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) {B : α} (hB: B ∈ lower_bounds s) :
f B ≤ Inf (f '' s) :=
@cSup_image_le (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ (λ x y hxy, h_mono hxy) _ hs _ hB
end monotone
/-!
### Relation between `Sup` / `Inf` and `finset.sup'` / `finset.inf'`
Like the `Sup` of a `conditionally_complete_lattice`, `finset.sup'` also requires the set to be
non-empty. As a result, we can translate between the two.
-/
namespace finset
lemma sup'_eq_cSup_image [conditionally_complete_lattice β] (s : finset α) (H) (f : α → β) :
s.sup' H f = Sup (f '' s) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine (finset.sup'_le _ _ $ λ a ha, _),
refine le_cSup ⟨s.sup' H f, _⟩ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
rintros i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩,
exact finset.le_sup' _ hj },
{ apply cSup_le ((coe_nonempty.mpr H).image _),
rintros _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
exact finset.le_sup' _ ha, }
end
lemma inf'_eq_cInf_image [conditionally_complete_lattice β] (s : finset α) (H) (f : α → β) :
s.inf' H f = Inf (f '' s) :=
@sup'_eq_cSup_image _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _
lemma sup'_id_eq_cSup [conditionally_complete_lattice α] (s : finset α) (H) :
s.sup' H id = Sup s :=
by rw [sup'_eq_cSup_image s H, set.image_id]
lemma inf'_id_eq_cInf [conditionally_complete_lattice α] (s : finset α) (H) :
s.inf' H id = Inf s :=
@sup'_id_eq_cSup (order_dual α) _ _ _
end finset
section with_top_bot
/-!
### Complete lattice structure on `with_top (with_bot α)`
If `α` is a `conditionally_complete_lattice`, then we show that `with_top α` and `with_bot α`
also inherit the structure of conditionally complete lattices. Furthermore, we show
that `with_top (with_bot α)` naturally inherits the structure of a complete lattice. Note that
for α a conditionally complete lattice, `Sup` and `Inf` both return junk values
for sets which are empty or unbounded. The extension of `Sup` to `with_top α` fixes
the unboundedness problem and the extension to `with_bot α` fixes the problem with
the empty set.
This result can be used to show that the extended reals [-∞, ∞] are a complete lattice.
-/
open_locale classical
/-- Adding a top element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance with_top.conditionally_complete_lattice
{α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice α] :
conditionally_complete_lattice (with_top α) :=
{ le_cSup := λ S a hS haS, (with_top.is_lub_Sup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS,
cSup_le := λ S a hS haS, (with_top.is_lub_Sup' hS).2 haS,
cInf_le := λ S a hS haS, (with_top.is_glb_Inf' hS).1 haS,
le_cInf := λ S a hS haS, (with_top.is_glb_Inf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS,
..with_top.lattice,
..with_top.has_Sup,
..with_top.has_Inf }
/-- Adding a bottom element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance with_bot.conditionally_complete_lattice
{α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice α] :
conditionally_complete_lattice (with_bot α) :=
{ le_cSup := (@with_top.conditionally_complete_lattice (order_dual α) _).cInf_le,
cSup_le := (@with_top.conditionally_complete_lattice (order_dual α) _).le_cInf,
cInf_le := (@with_top.conditionally_complete_lattice (order_dual α) _).le_cSup,
le_cInf := (@with_top.conditionally_complete_lattice (order_dual α) _).cSup_le,
..with_bot.lattice,
..with_bot.has_Sup,
..with_bot.has_Inf }
/-- Adding a bottom and a top to a conditionally complete lattice gives a bounded lattice-/
noncomputable instance with_top.with_bot.bounded_lattice {α : Type*}
[conditionally_complete_lattice α] : bounded_lattice (with_top (with_bot α)) :=
{ ..with_top.order_bot,
..with_top.order_top,
..conditionally_complete_lattice.to_lattice _ }
noncomputable instance with_top.with_bot.complete_lattice {α : Type*}
[conditionally_complete_lattice α] : complete_lattice (with_top (with_bot α)) :=
{ le_Sup := λ S a haS, (with_top.is_lub_Sup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS,
Sup_le := λ S a ha,
begin
cases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h,
{ show ite _ _ _ ≤ a,
split_ifs,
{ rw h at h_1, cases h_1 },
{ convert bot_le, convert with_bot.cSup_empty, rw h, refl },
{ exfalso, apply h_2, use ⊥, rw h, rintro b ⟨⟩ } },
{ refine (with_top.is_lub_Sup' h).2 ha }
end,
Inf_le := λ S a haS,
show ite _ _ _ ≤ a,
begin
split_ifs,
{ cases a with a, exact _root_.le_refl _,
cases (h haS); tauto },
{ cases a,
{ exact le_top },
{ apply with_top.some_le_some.2, refine cInf_le _ haS, use ⊥, intros b hb, exact bot_le } }
end,
le_Inf := λ S a haS, (with_top.is_glb_Inf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS,
..with_top.has_Inf,
..with_top.has_Sup,
..with_top.with_bot.bounded_lattice }
end with_top_bot
section subtype
variables (s : set α)
/-! ### Subtypes of conditionally complete linear orders
In this section we give conditions on a subset of a conditionally complete linear order, to ensure
that the subtype is itself conditionally complete.
We check that an `ord_connected` set satisfies these conditions.
TODO There are several possible variants; the `conditionally_complete_linear_order` could be changed
to `conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot` or `complete_linear_order`.
-/
open_locale classical
section has_Sup
variables [has_Sup α]
/-- `has_Sup` structure on a nonempty subset `s` of an object with `has_Sup`. This definition is
non-canonical (it uses `default s`); it should be used only as here, as an auxiliary instance in the
construction of the `conditionally_complete_linear_order` structure. -/
noncomputable def subset_has_Sup [inhabited s] : has_Sup s := {Sup := λ t,
if ht : Sup (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s then ⟨Sup (coe '' t : set α), ht⟩ else default s}
local attribute [instance] subset_has_Sup
@[simp] lemma subset_Sup_def [inhabited s] :
@Sup s _ = λ t,
if ht : Sup (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s then ⟨Sup (coe '' t : set α), ht⟩ else default s :=
rfl
lemma subset_Sup_of_within [inhabited s] {t : set s} (h : Sup (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s) :
Sup (coe '' t : set α) = (@Sup s _ t : α) :=
by simp [dif_pos h]
end has_Sup
section has_Inf
variables [has_Inf α]
/-- `has_Inf` structure on a nonempty subset `s` of an object with `has_Inf`. This definition is
non-canonical (it uses `default s`); it should be used only as here, as an auxiliary instance in the
construction of the `conditionally_complete_linear_order` structure. -/
noncomputable def subset_has_Inf [inhabited s] : has_Inf s := {Inf := λ t,
if ht : Inf (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s then ⟨Inf (coe '' t : set α), ht⟩ else default s}
local attribute [instance] subset_has_Inf
@[simp] lemma subset_Inf_def [inhabited s] :
@Inf s _ = λ t,
if ht : Inf (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s then ⟨Inf (coe '' t : set α), ht⟩ else default s :=
rfl
lemma subset_Inf_of_within [inhabited s] {t : set s} (h : Inf (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s) :
Inf (coe '' t : set α) = (@Inf s _ t : α) :=
by simp [dif_pos h]
end has_Inf
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α]
local attribute [instance] subset_has_Sup
local attribute [instance] subset_has_Inf
/-- For a nonempty subset of a conditionally complete linear order to be a conditionally complete
linear order, it suffices that it contain the `Sup` of all its nonempty bounded-above subsets, and
the `Inf` of all its nonempty bounded-below subsets. -/
noncomputable def subset_conditionally_complete_linear_order [inhabited s]
(h_Sup : ∀ {t : set s} (ht : t.nonempty) (h_bdd : bdd_above t), Sup (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s)
(h_Inf : ∀ {t : set s} (ht : t.nonempty) (h_bdd : bdd_below t), Inf (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s) :
conditionally_complete_linear_order s :=
{ le_cSup := begin
rintros t c h_bdd hct,
-- The following would be a more natural way to finish, but gives a "deep recursion" error:
-- simpa [subset_Sup_of_within (h_Sup t)] using
-- (strict_mono_coe s).monotone.le_cSup_image hct h_bdd,
have := (subtype.mono_coe s).le_cSup_image hct h_bdd,
rwa subset_Sup_of_within s (h_Sup ⟨c, hct⟩ h_bdd) at this,
end,
cSup_le := begin
rintros t B ht hB,
have := (subtype.mono_coe s).cSup_image_le ht hB,
rwa subset_Sup_of_within s (h_Sup ht ⟨B, hB⟩) at this,
end,
le_cInf := begin
intros t B ht hB,
have := (subtype.mono_coe s).le_cInf_image ht hB,
rwa subset_Inf_of_within s (h_Inf ht ⟨B, hB⟩) at this,
end,
cInf_le := begin
rintros t c h_bdd hct,
have := (subtype.mono_coe s).cInf_image_le hct h_bdd,
rwa subset_Inf_of_within s (h_Inf ⟨c, hct⟩ h_bdd) at this,
end,
..subset_has_Sup s,
..subset_has_Inf s,
..distrib_lattice.to_lattice s,
..(infer_instance : linear_order s) }
section ord_connected
/-- The `Sup` function on a nonempty `ord_connected` set `s` in a conditionally complete linear
order takes values within `s`, for all nonempty bounded-above subsets of `s`. -/
lemma Sup_within_of_ord_connected
{s : set α} [hs : ord_connected s] ⦃t : set s⦄ (ht : t.nonempty) (h_bdd : bdd_above t) :
Sup (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s :=
begin
obtain ⟨c, hct⟩ : ∃ c, c ∈ t := ht,
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ : ∃ B, B ∈ upper_bounds t := h_bdd,
refine hs.out c.2 B.2 ⟨_, _⟩,
{ exact (subtype.mono_coe s).le_cSup_image hct ⟨B, hB⟩ },
{ exact (subtype.mono_coe s).cSup_image_le ⟨c, hct⟩ hB },
end
/-- The `Inf` function on a nonempty `ord_connected` set `s` in a conditionally complete linear
order takes values within `s`, for all nonempty bounded-below subsets of `s`. -/
lemma Inf_within_of_ord_connected
{s : set α} [hs : ord_connected s] ⦃t : set s⦄ (ht : t.nonempty) (h_bdd : bdd_below t) :
Inf (coe '' t : set α) ∈ s :=
begin
obtain ⟨c, hct⟩ : ∃ c, c ∈ t := ht,
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ : ∃ B, B ∈ lower_bounds t := h_bdd,
refine hs.out B.2 c.2 ⟨_, _⟩,
{ exact (subtype.mono_coe s).le_cInf_image ⟨c, hct⟩ hB },
{ exact (subtype.mono_coe s).cInf_image_le hct ⟨B, hB⟩ },
end
/-- A nonempty `ord_connected` set in a conditionally complete linear order is naturally a
conditionally complete linear order. -/
noncomputable instance ord_connected_subset_conditionally_complete_linear_order
[inhabited s] [ord_connected s] :
conditionally_complete_linear_order s :=
subset_conditionally_complete_linear_order s Sup_within_of_ord_connected Inf_within_of_ord_connected
end ord_connected
end subtype
|
c0358198479eb99f980bccda1e512670431e938e | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/measure_theory/measure/content.lean | 6f90df01249751ea07d886110f7e7220ca623899 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,064 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import measure_theory.measure.measure_space
import measure_theory.measure.regular
import topology.sets.compacts
/-!
# Contents
In this file we work with *contents*. A content `λ` is a function from a certain class of subsets
(such as the compact subsets) to `ℝ≥0` that is
* additive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are disjoint sets in the domain of `λ`,
then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) = λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* subadditive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) ≤ λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* monotone: If `K₁ ⊆ K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁) ≤ λ(K₂)`.
We show that:
* Given a content `λ` on compact sets, let us define a function `λ*` on open sets, by letting
`λ* U` be the supremum of `λ K` for `K` included in `U`. This is a countably subadditive map that
vanishes at `∅`. In Halmos (1950) this is called the *inner content* `λ*` of `λ`, and formalized
as `inner_content`.
* Given an inner content, we define an outer measure `μ*`, by letting `μ* E` be the infimum of
`λ* U` over the open sets `U` containing `E`. This is indeed an outer measure. It is formalized
as `outer_measure`.
* Restricting this outer measure to Borel sets gives a regular measure `μ`.
We define bundled contents as `content`.
In this file we only work on contents on compact sets, and inner contents on open sets, and both
contents and inner contents map into the extended nonnegative reals. However, in other applications
other choices can be made, and it is not a priori clear what the best interface should be.
## Main definitions
For `μ : content G`, we define
* `μ.inner_content` : the inner content associated to `μ`.
* `μ.outer_measure` : the outer measure associated to `μ`.
* `μ.measure` : the Borel measure associated to `μ`.
We prove that, on a locally compact space, the measure `μ.measure` is regular.
## References
* Paul Halmos (1950), Measure Theory, §53
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_(measure_theory)>
-/
universes u v w
noncomputable theory
open set topological_space
open_locale nnreal ennreal
namespace measure_theory
variables {G : Type w} [topological_space G]
/-- A content is an additive function on compact sets taking values in `ℝ≥0`. It is a device
from which one can define a measure. -/
structure content (G : Type w) [topological_space G] :=
(to_fun : compacts G → ℝ≥0)
(mono' : ∀ (K₁ K₂ : compacts G), (K₁ : set G) ⊆ K₂ → to_fun K₁ ≤ to_fun K₂)
(sup_disjoint' : ∀ (K₁ K₂ : compacts G), disjoint (K₁ : set G) K₂ →
to_fun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = to_fun K₁ + to_fun K₂)
(sup_le' : ∀ (K₁ K₂ : compacts G), to_fun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ to_fun K₁ + to_fun K₂)
instance : inhabited (content G) :=
⟨{ to_fun := λ K, 0,
mono' := by simp,
sup_disjoint' := by simp,
sup_le' := by simp }⟩
/-- Although the `to_fun` field of a content takes values in `ℝ≥0`, we register a coercion to
functions taking values in `ℝ≥0∞` as most constructions below rely on taking suprs and infs, which
is more convenient in a complete lattice, and aim at constructing a measure. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (content G) (λ _, compacts G → ℝ≥0∞) := ⟨λ μ s, μ.to_fun s⟩
namespace content
variable (μ : content G)
lemma apply_eq_coe_to_fun (K : compacts G) : μ K = μ.to_fun K := rfl
lemma mono (K₁ K₂ : compacts G) (h : (K₁ : set G) ⊆ K₂) : μ K₁ ≤ μ K₂ :=
by simp [apply_eq_coe_to_fun, μ.mono' _ _ h]
lemma sup_disjoint (K₁ K₂ : compacts G) (h : disjoint (K₁ : set G) K₂) :
μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = μ K₁ + μ K₂ :=
by simp [apply_eq_coe_to_fun, μ.sup_disjoint' _ _ h]
lemma sup_le (K₁ K₂ : compacts G) : μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ μ K₁ + μ K₂ :=
by { simp only [apply_eq_coe_to_fun], norm_cast, exact μ.sup_le' _ _ }
lemma lt_top (K : compacts G) : μ K < ∞ :=
ennreal.coe_lt_top
lemma empty : μ ⊥ = 0 :=
begin
have := μ.sup_disjoint' ⊥ ⊥,
simpa [apply_eq_coe_to_fun] using this,
end
/-- Constructing the inner content of a content. From a content defined on the compact sets, we
obtain a function defined on all open sets, by taking the supremum of the content of all compact
subsets. -/
def inner_content (U : opens G) : ℝ≥0∞ := ⨆ (K : compacts G) (h : (K : set G) ⊆ U), μ K
lemma le_inner_content (K : compacts G) (U : opens G) (h2 : (K : set G) ⊆ U) :
μ K ≤ μ.inner_content U :=
le_supr_of_le K $ le_supr _ h2
lemma inner_content_le (U : opens G) (K : compacts G) (h2 : (U : set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.inner_content U ≤ μ K :=
supr₂_le $ λ K' hK', μ.mono _ _ (subset.trans hK' h2)
lemma inner_content_of_is_compact {K : set G} (h1K : is_compact K) (h2K : is_open K) :
μ.inner_content ⟨K, h2K⟩ = μ ⟨K, h1K⟩ :=
le_antisymm (supr₂_le $ λ K' hK', μ.mono _ ⟨K, h1K⟩ hK')
(μ.le_inner_content _ _ subset.rfl)
lemma inner_content_empty :
μ.inner_content ∅ = 0 :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (zero_le _), rw ←μ.empty,
refine supr₂_le (λ K hK, _),
have : K = ⊥, { ext1, rw [subset_empty_iff.mp hK, compacts.coe_bot] }, rw this, refl'
end
/-- This is "unbundled", because that it required for the API of `induced_outer_measure`. -/
lemma inner_content_mono ⦃U V : set G⦄ (hU : is_open U) (hV : is_open V)
(h2 : U ⊆ V) : μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.inner_content ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
bsupr_mono $ λ K hK, hK.trans h2
lemma inner_content_exists_compact {U : opens G}
(hU : μ.inner_content U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ K : compacts G, (K : set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.inner_content U ≤ μ K + ε :=
begin
have h'ε := ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε,
cases le_or_lt (μ.inner_content U) ε,
{ exact ⟨⊥, empty_subset _, le_add_left h⟩ },
have := ennreal.sub_lt_self hU h.ne_bot h'ε,
conv at this {to_rhs, rw inner_content }, simp only [lt_supr_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨U, h1U, h2U⟩, refine ⟨U, h1U, _⟩,
rw [← tsub_le_iff_right], exact le_of_lt h2U
end
/-- The inner content of a supremum of opens is at most the sum of the individual inner
contents. -/
lemma inner_content_Sup_nat [t2_space G] (U : ℕ → opens G) :
μ.inner_content (⨆ (i : ℕ), U i) ≤ ∑' (i : ℕ), μ.inner_content (U i) :=
begin
have h3 : ∀ (t : finset ℕ) (K : ℕ → compacts G), μ (t.sup K) ≤ t.sum (λ i, μ (K i)),
{ intros t K, refine finset.induction_on t _ _,
{ simp only [μ.empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, finset.sum_empty, finset.sup_empty], },
{ intros n s hn ih, rw [finset.sup_insert, finset.sum_insert hn],
exact le_trans (μ.sup_le _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _) }},
refine supr₂_le (λ K hK, _),
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := K.compact.elim_finite_subcover _ (λ i, (U i).prop) _, swap,
{ convert hK, rw [opens.supr_def, subtype.coe_mk] },
rcases K.compact.finite_compact_cover t (coe ∘ U) (λ i _, (U _).prop) (by simp only [ht])
with ⟨K', h1K', h2K', h3K'⟩,
let L : ℕ → compacts G := λ n, ⟨K' n, h1K' n⟩,
convert le_trans (h3 t L) _,
{ ext1, rw [compacts.coe_finset_sup, finset.sup_eq_supr], exact h3K' },
refine le_trans (finset.sum_le_sum _) (ennreal.sum_le_tsum t),
intros i hi, refine le_trans _ (le_supr _ (L i)),
refine le_trans _ (le_supr _ (h2K' i)), refl'
end
/-- The inner content of a union of sets is at most the sum of the individual inner contents.
This is the "unbundled" version of `inner_content_Sup_nat`.
It required for the API of `induced_outer_measure`. -/
lemma inner_content_Union_nat [t2_space G] ⦃U : ℕ → set G⦄ (hU : ∀ (i : ℕ), is_open (U i)) :
μ.inner_content ⟨⋃ (i : ℕ), U i, is_open_Union hU⟩ ≤ ∑' (i : ℕ), μ.inner_content ⟨U i, hU i⟩ :=
by { have := μ.inner_content_Sup_nat (λ i, ⟨U i, hU i⟩), rwa [opens.supr_def] at this }
lemma inner_content_comap (f : G ≃ₜ G)
(h : ∀ ⦃K : compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K) (U : opens G) :
μ.inner_content (opens.comap f.to_continuous_map U) = μ.inner_content U :=
begin
refine (compacts.equiv f).surjective.supr_congr _ (λ K, supr_congr_Prop image_subset_iff _),
intro hK, simp only [equiv.coe_fn_mk, subtype.mk_eq_mk, ennreal.coe_eq_coe, compacts.equiv],
apply h,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma is_mul_left_invariant_inner_content [group G] [topological_group G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(U : opens G) :
μ.inner_content (opens.comap (homeomorph.mul_left g).to_continuous_map U) = μ.inner_content U :=
by convert μ.inner_content_comap (homeomorph.mul_left g) (λ K, h g) U
@[to_additive]
lemma inner_content_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [t2_space G] [group G] [topological_group G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K)
(K : compacts G) (hK : μ K ≠ 0) (U : opens G) (hU : (U : set G).nonempty) :
0 < μ.inner_content U :=
begin
have : (interior (U : set G)).nonempty, rwa [U.prop.interior_eq],
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates K.2 this with ⟨s, hs⟩,
suffices : μ K ≤ s.card * μ.inner_content U,
{ exact (ennreal.mul_pos_iff.mp $ hK.bot_lt.trans_le this).2 },
have : (K : set G) ⊆ ↑⨆ (g ∈ s), opens.comap (homeomorph.mul_left g).to_continuous_map U,
{ simpa only [opens.supr_def, opens.coe_comap, subtype.coe_mk] },
refine (μ.le_inner_content _ _ this).trans _,
refine (rel_supr_sum (μ.inner_content) (μ.inner_content_empty) (≤)
(μ.inner_content_Sup_nat) _ _).trans _,
simp only [μ.is_mul_left_invariant_inner_content h3, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, le_refl]
end
lemma inner_content_mono' ⦃U V : set G⦄ (hU : is_open U) (hV : is_open V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.inner_content ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
bsupr_mono $ λ K hK, hK.trans h2
/-- Extending a content on compact sets to an outer measure on all sets. -/
protected def outer_measure : outer_measure G :=
induced_outer_measure (λ U hU, μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩) is_open_empty μ.inner_content_empty
variables [t2_space G]
lemma outer_measure_opens (U : opens G) : μ.outer_measure U = μ.inner_content U :=
induced_outer_measure_eq' (λ _, is_open_Union) μ.inner_content_Union_nat μ.inner_content_mono U.2
lemma outer_measure_of_is_open (U : set G) (hU : is_open U) :
μ.outer_measure U = μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
μ.outer_measure_opens ⟨U, hU⟩
lemma outer_measure_le
(U : opens G) (K : compacts G) (hUK : (U : set G) ⊆ K) : μ.outer_measure U ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outer_measure_opens U).le.trans $ μ.inner_content_le U K hUK
lemma le_outer_measure_compacts (K : compacts G) : μ K ≤ μ.outer_measure K :=
begin
rw [content.outer_measure, induced_outer_measure_eq_infi],
{ exact le_infi (λ U, le_infi $ λ hU, le_infi $ μ.le_inner_content K ⟨U, hU⟩) },
{ exact μ.inner_content_Union_nat },
{ exact μ.inner_content_mono }
end
lemma outer_measure_eq_infi (A : set G) :
μ.outer_measure A = ⨅ (U : set G) (hU : is_open U) (h : A ⊆ U), μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
induced_outer_measure_eq_infi _ μ.inner_content_Union_nat μ.inner_content_mono A
lemma outer_measure_interior_compacts (K : compacts G) : μ.outer_measure (interior K) ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outer_measure_opens $ opens.interior K).le.trans $ μ.inner_content_le _ _ interior_subset
lemma outer_measure_exists_compact {U : opens G} (hU : μ.outer_measure U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : compacts G, (K : set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.outer_measure U ≤ μ.outer_measure K + ε :=
begin
rw [μ.outer_measure_opens] at hU ⊢,
rcases μ.inner_content_exists_compact hU hε with ⟨K, h1K, h2K⟩,
exact ⟨K, h1K, le_trans h2K $ add_le_add_right (μ.le_outer_measure_compacts K) _⟩,
end
lemma outer_measure_exists_open {A : set G} (hA : μ.outer_measure A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U : opens G, A ⊆ U ∧ μ.outer_measure U ≤ μ.outer_measure A + ε :=
begin
rcases induced_outer_measure_exists_set _ _ μ.inner_content_mono hA (ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε)
with ⟨U, hU, h2U, h3U⟩,
exact ⟨⟨U, hU⟩, h2U, h3U⟩, swap, exact μ.inner_content_Union_nat
end
lemma outer_measure_preimage (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(A : set G) : μ.outer_measure (f ⁻¹' A) = μ.outer_measure A :=
begin
refine induced_outer_measure_preimage _ μ.inner_content_Union_nat μ.inner_content_mono _
(λ s, f.is_open_preimage) _,
intros s hs, convert μ.inner_content_comap f h ⟨s, hs⟩
end
lemma outer_measure_lt_top_of_is_compact [locally_compact_space G]
{K : set G} (hK : is_compact K) : μ.outer_measure K < ∞ :=
begin
rcases exists_compact_superset hK with ⟨F, h1F, h2F⟩,
calc
μ.outer_measure K ≤ μ.outer_measure (interior F) : outer_measure.mono' _ h2F
... ≤ μ ⟨F, h1F⟩ :
by apply μ.outer_measure_le ⟨interior F, is_open_interior⟩ ⟨F, h1F⟩ interior_subset
... < ⊤ : μ.lt_top _
end
@[to_additive]
lemma is_mul_left_invariant_outer_measure [group G] [topological_group G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(A : set G) : μ.outer_measure ((λ h, g * h) ⁻¹' A) = μ.outer_measure A :=
by convert μ.outer_measure_preimage (homeomorph.mul_left g) (λ K, h g) A
lemma outer_measure_caratheodory (A : set G) :
μ.outer_measure.caratheodory.measurable_set' A ↔ ∀ (U : opens G),
μ.outer_measure (U ∩ A) + μ.outer_measure (U \ A) ≤ μ.outer_measure U :=
begin
dsimp [opens], rw subtype.forall,
apply induced_outer_measure_caratheodory,
apply inner_content_Union_nat,
apply inner_content_mono'
end
@[to_additive]
lemma outer_measure_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [group G] [topological_group G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K)
(K : compacts G) (hK : μ K ≠ 0) {U : set G} (h1U : is_open U) (h2U : U.nonempty) :
0 < μ.outer_measure U :=
by { convert μ.inner_content_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant h3 K hK ⟨U, h1U⟩ h2U,
exact μ.outer_measure_opens ⟨U, h1U⟩ }
variables [S : measurable_space G] [borel_space G]
include S
/-- For the outer measure coming from a content, all Borel sets are measurable. -/
lemma borel_le_caratheodory : S ≤ μ.outer_measure.caratheodory :=
begin
rw [@borel_space.measurable_eq G _ _],
refine measurable_space.generate_from_le _,
intros U hU,
rw μ.outer_measure_caratheodory,
intro U',
rw μ.outer_measure_of_is_open ((U' : set G) ∩ U) (is_open.inter U'.prop hU),
simp only [inner_content, supr_subtype'], rw [opens.coe_mk],
haveI : nonempty {L : compacts G // (L : set G) ⊆ U' ∩ U} := ⟨⟨⊥, empty_subset _⟩⟩,
rw [ennreal.supr_add],
refine supr_le _, rintro ⟨L, hL⟩, simp only [subset_inter_iff] at hL,
have : ↑U' \ U ⊆ U' \ L := diff_subset_diff_right hL.2,
refine le_trans (add_le_add_left (μ.outer_measure.mono' this) _) _,
rw μ.outer_measure_of_is_open (↑U' \ L) (is_open.sdiff U'.2 L.2.is_closed),
simp only [inner_content, supr_subtype'], rw [opens.coe_mk],
haveI : nonempty {M : compacts G // (M : set G) ⊆ ↑U' \ L} := ⟨⟨⊥, empty_subset _⟩⟩,
rw [ennreal.add_supr], refine supr_le _, rintro ⟨M, hM⟩, simp only [subset_diff] at hM,
have : (↑(L ⊔ M) : set G) ⊆ U',
{ simp only [union_subset_iff, compacts.coe_sup, hM, hL, and_self] },
rw μ.outer_measure_of_is_open ↑U' U'.2,
refine le_trans (ge_of_eq _) (μ.le_inner_content _ _ this),
exact μ.sup_disjoint _ _ hM.2.symm,
end
/-- The measure induced by the outer measure coming from a content, on the Borel sigma-algebra. -/
protected def measure : measure G := μ.outer_measure.to_measure μ.borel_le_caratheodory
lemma measure_apply {s : set G} (hs : measurable_set s) : μ.measure s = μ.outer_measure s :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
/-- In a locally compact space, any measure constructed from a content is regular. -/
instance regular [locally_compact_space G] : μ.measure.regular :=
begin
haveI : μ.measure.outer_regular,
{ refine ⟨λ A hA r (hr : _ < _), _⟩,
rw [μ.measure_apply hA, outer_measure_eq_infi] at hr,
simp only [infi_lt_iff] at hr,
rcases hr with ⟨U, hUo, hAU, hr⟩,
rw [← μ.outer_measure_of_is_open U hUo, ← μ.measure_apply hUo.measurable_set] at hr,
exact ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hr⟩ },
haveI : is_finite_measure_on_compacts μ.measure,
{ refine ⟨λ K hK, _⟩,
rw [measure_apply _ hK.measurable_set],
exact μ.outer_measure_lt_top_of_is_compact hK },
refine ⟨λ U hU r hr, _⟩,
rw [measure_apply _ hU.measurable_set, μ.outer_measure_of_is_open U hU] at hr,
simp only [inner_content, lt_supr_iff] at hr,
rcases hr with ⟨K, hKU, hr⟩,
refine ⟨K, hKU, K.2, hr.trans_le _⟩,
exact (μ.le_outer_measure_compacts K).trans (le_to_measure_apply _ _ _)
end
end content
end measure_theory
|
4ee0cfdf3fdafb535356bd32dfb4680dbd137049 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/enum.lean | 77b9899e015b42c32777b588a3602833b6f3204c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 406 | lean | import logic
inductive Three :=
| zero : Three
| one : Three
| two : Three
namespace Three
theorem disj (a : Three) : a = zero ∨ a = one ∨ a = two :=
Three.rec (or.inl rfl) (or.inr (or.inl rfl)) (or.inr (or.inr rfl)) a
example (a : Three) : a ≠ zero → a ≠ one → a = two :=
Three.rec (λ h₁ h₂, absurd rfl h₁) (λ h₁ h₂, absurd rfl h₂) (λ h₁ h₂, rfl) a
end Three
|
870a504f535c04ac9fc0600db42e87fa7120ac4e | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/analysis/ODE/gronwall.lean | 045f5bcd8098b4c95ac83ea16077af15111b934f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,195 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv
/-!
# Grönwall's inequality
The main technical result of this file is the Grönwall-like inequality
`norm_le_gronwall_bound_of_norm_deriv_right_le`. It states that if `f : ℝ → E` satisfies `∥f a∥ ≤ δ`
and `∀ x ∈ [a, b), ∥f' x∥ ≤ K * ∥f x∥ + ε`, then for all `x ∈ [a, b]` we have `∥f x∥ ≤ δ * exp (K *
x) + (ε / K) * (exp (K * x) - 1)`.
Then we use this inequality to prove some estimates on the possible rate of growth of the distance
between two approximate or exact solutions of an ordinary differential equation.
The proofs are based on [Hubbard and West, *Differential Equations: A Dynamical Systems Approach*,
Sec. 4.5][HubbardWest-ode], where `norm_le_gronwall_bound_of_norm_deriv_right_le` is called
“Fundamental Inequality”.
## TODO
- Once we have FTC, prove an inequality for a function satisfying `∥f' x∥ ≤ K x * ∥f x∥ + ε`,
or more generally `liminf_{y→x+0} (f y - f x)/(y - x) ≤ K x * f x + ε` with any sign
of `K x` and `f x`.
-/
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F]
open metric set asymptotics filter real
open_locale classical topological_space nnreal
/-! ### Technical lemmas about `gronwall_bound` -/
/-- Upper bound used in several Grönwall-like inequalities. -/
noncomputable def gronwall_bound (δ K ε x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if K = 0 then δ + ε * x else δ * exp (K * x) + (ε / K) * (exp (K * x) - 1)
lemma gronwall_bound_K0 (δ ε : ℝ) : gronwall_bound δ 0 ε = λ x, δ + ε * x :=
funext $ λ x, if_pos rfl
lemma gronwall_bound_of_K_ne_0 {δ K ε : ℝ} (hK : K ≠ 0) :
gronwall_bound δ K ε = λ x, δ * exp (K * x) + (ε / K) * (exp (K * x) - 1) :=
funext $ λ x, if_neg hK
lemma has_deriv_at_gronwall_bound (δ K ε x : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (gronwall_bound δ K ε) (K * (gronwall_bound δ K ε x) + ε) x :=
begin
by_cases hK : K = 0,
{ subst K,
simp only [gronwall_bound_K0, zero_mul, zero_add],
convert ((has_deriv_at_id x).const_mul ε).const_add δ,
rw [mul_one] },
{ simp only [gronwall_bound_of_K_ne_0 hK],
convert (((has_deriv_at_id x).const_mul K).exp.const_mul δ).add
((((has_deriv_at_id x).const_mul K).exp.sub_const 1).const_mul (ε / K)) using 1,
simp only [id, mul_add, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_comm _ K, mul_div_cancel' _ hK],
ring }
end
lemma has_deriv_at_gronwall_bound_shift (δ K ε x a : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, gronwall_bound δ K ε (y - a)) (K * (gronwall_bound δ K ε (x - a)) + ε) x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_gronwall_bound δ K ε _).comp x ((has_deriv_at_id x).sub_const a),
rw [id, mul_one]
end
lemma gronwall_bound_x0 (δ K ε : ℝ) : gronwall_bound δ K ε 0 = δ :=
begin
by_cases hK : K = 0,
{ simp only [gronwall_bound, if_pos hK, mul_zero, add_zero] },
{ simp only [gronwall_bound, if_neg hK, mul_zero, exp_zero, sub_self, mul_one, add_zero] }
end
lemma gronwall_bound_ε0 (δ K x : ℝ) : gronwall_bound δ K 0 x = δ * exp (K * x) :=
begin
by_cases hK : K = 0,
{ simp only [gronwall_bound_K0, hK, zero_mul, exp_zero, add_zero, mul_one] },
{ simp only [gronwall_bound_of_K_ne_0 hK, zero_div, zero_mul, add_zero] }
end
lemma gronwall_bound_ε0_δ0 (K x : ℝ) : gronwall_bound 0 K 0 x = 0 :=
by simp only [gronwall_bound_ε0, zero_mul]
lemma gronwall_bound_continuous_ε (δ K x : ℝ) : continuous (λ ε, gronwall_bound δ K ε x) :=
begin
by_cases hK : K = 0,
{ simp only [gronwall_bound_K0, hK],
exact continuous_const.add (continuous_id.mul continuous_const) },
{ simp only [gronwall_bound_of_K_ne_0 hK],
exact continuous_const.add ((continuous_id.mul continuous_const).mul continuous_const) }
end
/-! ### Inequality and corollaries -/
/-- A Grönwall-like inequality: if `f : ℝ → ℝ` is continuous on `[a, b]` and satisfies
the inequalities `f a ≤ δ` and
`∀ x ∈ [a, b), liminf_{z→x+0} (f z - f x)/(z - x) ≤ K * (f x) + ε`, then `f x`
is bounded by `gronwall_bound δ K ε (x - a)` on `[a, b]`.
See also `norm_le_gronwall_bound_of_norm_deriv_right_le` for a version bounding `∥f x∥`,
`f : ℝ → E`. -/
theorem le_gronwall_bound_of_liminf_deriv_right_le {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {δ K ε : ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r →
∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[Ioi x] x, (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r)
(ha : f a ≤ δ) (bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f' x ≤ K * f x + ε) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x ≤ gronwall_bound δ K ε (x - a) :=
begin
have H : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∀ ε' ∈ Ioi ε, f x ≤ gronwall_bound δ K ε' (x - a),
{ assume x hx ε' hε',
apply image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary hf hf',
{ rwa [sub_self, gronwall_bound_x0] },
{ exact λ x, has_deriv_at_gronwall_bound_shift δ K ε' x a },
{ assume x hx hfB,
rw [← hfB],
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (bound x hx),
exact add_lt_add_left hε' _ },
{ exact hx } },
assume x hx,
change f x ≤ (λ ε', gronwall_bound δ K ε' (x - a)) ε,
convert continuous_within_at_const.closure_le _ _ (H x hx),
{ simp only [closure_Ioi, left_mem_Ici] },
exact (gronwall_bound_continuous_ε δ K (x - a)).continuous_within_at
end
/-- A Grönwall-like inequality: if `f : ℝ → E` is continuous on `[a, b]`, has right derivative
`f' x` at every point `x ∈ [a, b)`, and satisfies the inequalities `∥f a∥ ≤ δ`,
`∀ x ∈ [a, b), ∥f' x∥ ≤ K * ∥f x∥ + ε`, then `∥f x∥` is bounded by `gronwall_bound δ K ε (x - a)`
on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem norm_le_gronwall_bound_of_norm_deriv_right_le {f f' : ℝ → E} {δ K ε : ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(ha : ∥f a∥ ≤ δ) (bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∥f' x∥ ≤ K * ∥f x∥ + ε) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∥f x∥ ≤ gronwall_bound δ K ε (x - a) :=
le_gronwall_bound_of_liminf_deriv_right_le (continuous_norm.comp_continuous_on hf)
(λ x hx r hr, (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le hr) ha bound
/-- If `f` and `g` are two approximate solutions of the same ODE, then the distance between them
can't grow faster than exponentially. This is a simple corollary of Grönwall's inequality, and some
people call this Grönwall's inequality too.
This version assumes all inequalities to be true in some time-dependent set `s t`,
and assumes that the solutions never leave this set. -/
theorem dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set {v : ℝ → E → E} {s : ℝ → set E}
{K : ℝ} (hv : ∀ t, ∀ x y ∈ s t, dist (v t x) (v t y) ≤ K * dist x y)
{f g f' g' : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {εf εg δ : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at f (f' t) (Ici t) t)
(f_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (f' t) (v t (f t)) ≤ εf)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : continuous_on g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at g (g' t) (Ici t) t)
(g_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (g' t) (v t (g t)) ≤ εg)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, g t ∈ s t)
(ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ gronwall_bound δ K (εf + εg) (t - a) :=
begin
simp only [dist_eq_norm] at ha ⊢,
have h_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at (λ t, f t - g t) (f' t - g' t) (Ici t) t,
from λ t ht, (hf' t ht).sub (hg' t ht),
apply norm_le_gronwall_bound_of_norm_deriv_right_le (hf.sub hg) h_deriv ha,
assume t ht,
have := dist_triangle4_right (f' t) (g' t) (v t (f t)) (v t (g t)),
rw [dist_eq_norm] at this,
apply le_trans this,
apply le_trans (add_le_add (add_le_add (f_bound t ht) (g_bound t ht))
(hv t (f t) (g t) (hfs t ht) (hgs t ht))),
rw [dist_eq_norm, add_comm]
end
/-- If `f` and `g` are two approximate solutions of the same ODE, then the distance between them
can't grow faster than exponentially. This is a simple corollary of Grönwall's inequality, and some
people call this Grönwall's inequality too.
This version assumes all inequalities to be true in the whole space. -/
theorem dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE {v : ℝ → E → E}
{K : ℝ≥0} (hv : ∀ t, lipschitz_with K (v t))
{f g f' g' : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {εf εg δ : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at f (f' t) (Ici t) t)
(f_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (f' t) (v t (f t)) ≤ εf)
(hg : continuous_on g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at g (g' t) (Ici t) t)
(g_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (g' t) (v t (g t)) ≤ εg)
(ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ gronwall_bound δ K (εf + εg) (t - a) :=
have hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ (@univ E), from λ t ht, trivial,
dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set (λ t x y hx hy, (hv t).dist_le_mul x y)
hf hf' f_bound hfs hg hg' g_bound (λ t ht, trivial) ha
/-- If `f` and `g` are two exact solutions of the same ODE, then the distance between them
can't grow faster than exponentially. This is a simple corollary of Grönwall's inequality, and some
people call this Grönwall's inequality too.
This version assumes all inequalities to be true in some time-dependent set `s t`,
and assumes that the solutions never leave this set. -/
theorem dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set {v : ℝ → E → E} {s : ℝ → set E}
{K : ℝ} (hv : ∀ t, ∀ x y ∈ s t, dist (v t x) (v t y) ≤ K * dist x y)
{f g : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {δ : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at f (v t (f t)) (Ici t) t)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : continuous_on g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at g (v t (g t)) (Ici t) t)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, g t ∈ s t)
(ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ δ * exp (K * (t - a)) :=
begin
have f_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (v t (f t)) (v t (f t)) ≤ 0,
by { intros, rw [dist_self] },
have g_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (v t (g t)) (v t (g t)) ≤ 0,
by { intros, rw [dist_self] },
assume t ht,
have := dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set hv hf hf' f_bound hfs hg hg' g_bound
hgs ha t ht,
rwa [zero_add, gronwall_bound_ε0] at this,
end
/-- If `f` and `g` are two exact solutions of the same ODE, then the distance between them
can't grow faster than exponentially. This is a simple corollary of Grönwall's inequality, and some
people call this Grönwall's inequality too.
This version assumes all inequalities to be true in the whole space. -/
theorem dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE {v : ℝ → E → E}
{K : ℝ≥0} (hv : ∀ t, lipschitz_with K (v t))
{f g : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {δ : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at f (v t (f t)) (Ici t) t)
(hg : continuous_on g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at g (v t (g t)) (Ici t) t)
(ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ δ * exp (K * (t - a)) :=
have hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ (@univ E), from λ t ht, trivial,
dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set (λ t x y hx hy, (hv t).dist_le_mul x y)
hf hf' hfs hg hg' (λ t ht, trivial) ha
/-- There exists only one solution of an ODE \(\dot x=v(t, x)\) in a set `s ⊆ ℝ × E` with
a given initial value provided that RHS is Lipschitz continuous in `x` within `s`,
and we consider only solutions included in `s`. -/
theorem ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_set {v : ℝ → E → E} {s : ℝ → set E}
{K : ℝ} (hv : ∀ t, ∀ x y ∈ s t, dist (v t x) (v t y) ≤ K * dist x y)
{f g : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at f (v t (f t)) (Ici t) t)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : continuous_on g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at g (v t (g t)) (Ici t) t)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, g t ∈ s t)
(ha : f a = g a) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, f t = g t :=
begin
assume t ht,
have := dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set hv hf hf' hfs hg hg' hgs
(dist_le_zero.2 ha) t ht,
rwa [zero_mul, dist_le_zero] at this
end
/-- There exists only one solution of an ODE \(\dot x=v(t, x)\) with
a given initial value provided that RHS is Lipschitz continuous in `x`. -/
theorem ODE_solution_unique {v : ℝ → E → E}
{K : ℝ≥0} (hv : ∀ t, lipschitz_with K (v t))
{f g : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at f (v t (f t)) (Ici t) t)
(hg : continuous_on g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, has_deriv_within_at g (v t (g t)) (Ici t) t)
(ha : f a = g a) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, f t = g t :=
have hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ (@univ E), from λ t ht, trivial,
ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_set (λ t x y hx hy, (hv t).dist_le_mul x y)
hf hf' hfs hg hg' (λ t ht, trivial) ha
|
4294c9f4a001ee04553bd00448eb71fd1206bd71 | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/analysis/specific_limits.lean | 2972df8ea0180fd11b9f2de90ec30d64c4c6a08f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,149 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import analysis.normed_space.basic
import algebra.geom_sum
import order.filter.archimedean
import topology.instances.ennreal
import tactic.ring_exp
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical function filter finset metric
open_locale classical topological_space nat big_operators
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
lemma tendsto_norm_at_top_at_top : tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_abs_at_top_at_top
lemma summable_of_absolute_convergence_real {f : ℕ → ℝ} :
(∃r, tendsto (λn, (∑ i in range n, abs (f i))) at_top (𝓝 r)) → summable f
| ⟨r, hr⟩ :=
begin
refine summable_of_summable_norm ⟨r, (has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg _ _).2 _⟩,
exact assume i, norm_nonneg _,
simpa only using hr
end
lemma tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_at_top_zero.comp tendsto_coe_nat_at_top_at_top
lemma tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat (C : ℝ) : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, C / n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa only [mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat
lemma nnreal.tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : nnreal)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw ← nnreal.tendsto_coe, convert tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat, simp }
lemma nnreal.tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat (C : nnreal) :
tendsto (λ n : ℕ, C / n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul nnreal.tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat
lemma tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat :
tendsto (λ n : ℕ, 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
suffices tendsto (λ n : ℕ, 1 / (↑(n + 1) : ℝ)) at_top (𝓝 0), by simpa,
(tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat 1).2 (tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat 1)
/-! ### Powers -/
lemma tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos [linear_ordered_semiring α] [archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 0 < r) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, (r + 1)^n) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' (λ n m, pow_le_pow (le_add_of_nonneg_left (le_of_lt h))) $
not_bdd_above_iff.2 $ λ x, set.exists_range_iff.2 $ add_one_pow_unbounded_of_pos _ h
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt [linear_ordered_ring α] [archimedean α]
{r : α} (h : 1 < r) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) at_top at_top :=
sub_add_cancel r 1 ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos (sub_pos.2 h)
lemma nat.tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, m ^ n) at_top at_top :=
nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt h) ▸
tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos (nat.sub_pos_of_lt h)
lemma lim_norm_zero' {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_group 𝕜] :
tendsto (norm : 𝕜 → ℝ) (𝓝[{x | x ≠ 0}] 0) (𝓝[set.Ioi 0] 0) :=
lim_norm_zero.inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ λ x hx, norm_pos_iff.2 hx
lemma normed_field.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhds_within_0_at_top {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] :
tendsto (λ x:𝕜, ∥x⁻¹∥) (𝓝[{x | x ≠ 0}] 0) at_top :=
(tendsto_inv_zero_at_top.comp lim_norm_zero').congr $ λ x, (normed_field.norm_inv x).symm
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by_cases
(assume : r = 0, (tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat 1).mp $ by simp [pow_succ, this, tendsto_const_nhds])
(assume : r ≠ 0,
have tendsto (λn, (r⁻¹ ^ n)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0),
from tendsto_inv_at_top_zero.comp
(tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt $ one_lt_inv (lt_of_le_of_ne h₁ this.symm) h₂),
tendsto.congr' (univ_mem_sets' $ by simp *) this)
lemma geom_lt {u : ℕ → ℝ} {k : ℝ} (hk : 0 < k) {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ m ≤ n, k*u m < u (m + 1)) :
k^(n + 1) *u 0 < u (n + 1) :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simpa using h 0 (le_refl _) },
have : (∀ (m : ℕ), m ≤ n → k * u m < u (m + 1)),
intros m hm, apply h, exact nat.le_succ_of_le hm,
specialize ih this,
change k ^ (n + 2) * u 0 < u (n + 2),
replace h : k * u (n + 1) < u (n + 2) := h (n+1) (le_refl _),
calc k ^ (n + 2) * u 0 = k*(k ^ (n + 1) * u 0) : by ring_exp
... < k*(u (n + 1)) : mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ih hk
... < u (n + 2) : h,
end
/-- If a sequence `v` of real numbers satisfies `k*v n < v (n+1)` with `1 < k`,
then it goes to +∞. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_geom_lt {v : ℕ → ℝ} {k : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < v 0) (hk : 1 < k)
(hu : ∀ n, k*v n < v (n+1)) : tendsto v at_top at_top :=
begin
apply tendsto_at_top_mono,
show ∀ n, k^n*v 0 ≤ v n,
{ intro n,
induction n with n ih,
{ simp },
calc
k ^ (n + 1) * v 0 = k*(k^n*v 0) : by ring_exp
... ≤ k*v n : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ih (by linarith)
... ≤ v (n + 1) : le_of_lt (hu n) },
apply tendsto_at_top_mul_right h₀,
exact tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt hk,
end
lemma nnreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {r : nnreal} (hr : r < 1) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
nnreal.tendsto_coe.1 $ by simp only [nnreal.coe_pow, nnreal.coe_zero,
tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 r.coe_nonneg hr]
lemma ennreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {r : ennreal} (hr : r < 1) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩,
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero],
norm_cast at *,
apply nnreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 hr
end
/-- In a normed ring, the powers of an element x with `∥x∥ < 1` tend to zero. -/
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] {x : R}
(h : ∥x∥ < 1) : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), x ^ n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
apply squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_norm_pow_le x),
exact tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h,
end
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h
/-! ### Geometric series-/
section geometric
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
has_sum (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
have r ≠ 1, from ne_of_lt h₂,
have r + -1 ≠ 0,
by rw [←sub_eq_add_neg, ne, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]; simp; assumption,
have tendsto (λn, (r ^ n - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹)),
from ((tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds,
have (λ n, (∑ i in range n, r ^ i)) = (λ n, geom_series r n) := rfl,
(has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg h₁) _).mpr $
by simp [neg_inv, geom_sum, div_eq_mul_inv, *] at *
lemma summable_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : (∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n) = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂).tsum_eq
lemma has_sum_geometric_two : has_sum (λn:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n) 2 :=
by convert has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 _ _; norm_num
lemma summable_geometric_two : summable (λn:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_two⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_two : (∑'n:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n) = 2 :=
has_sum_geometric_two.tsum_eq
lemma sum_geometric_two_le (n : ℕ) : ∑ (i : ℕ) in range n, (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i ≤ 2 :=
begin
have : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i,
{ intro i, apply pow_nonneg, norm_num },
convert sum_le_tsum (range n) (λ i _, this i) summable_geometric_two,
exact tsum_geometric_two.symm
end
lemma has_sum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2 ^ n) a :=
begin
convert has_sum.mul_left (a / 2) (has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1
(le_of_lt one_half_pos) one_half_lt_one),
{ funext n, simp, refl, },
{ norm_num }
end
lemma summable_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : summable (λ n:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2 ^ n) :=
⟨a, has_sum_geometric_two' a⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : (∑' n:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2^n) = a :=
(has_sum_geometric_two' a).tsum_eq
lemma nnreal.has_sum_geometric {r : nnreal} (hr : r < 1) :
has_sum (λ n : ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
begin
apply nnreal.has_sum_coe.1,
push_cast,
rw [nnreal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hr)],
exact has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 r.coe_nonneg hr
end
lemma nnreal.summable_geometric {r : nnreal} (hr : r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
⟨_, nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_nnreal {r : nnreal} (hr : r < 1) : (∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n) = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr).tsum_eq
/-- The series `pow r` converges to `(1-r)⁻¹`. For `r < 1` the RHS is a finite number,
and for `1 ≤ r` the RHS equals `∞`. -/
lemma ennreal.tsum_geometric (r : ennreal) : (∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n) = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
begin
cases lt_or_le r 1 with hr hr,
{ rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩,
norm_cast at *,
convert ennreal.tsum_coe_eq (nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr),
rw [ennreal.coe_inv $ ne_of_gt $ nnreal.sub_pos.2 hr] },
{ rw [ennreal.sub_eq_zero_of_le hr, ennreal.inv_zero, ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat, supr_eq_top],
refine λ a ha, (ennreal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ha)).imp
(λ n hn, lt_of_lt_of_le hn _),
have : ∀ k:ℕ, 1 ≤ r^k, by simpa using canonically_ordered_semiring.pow_le_pow_of_le_left hr,
calc (n:ennreal) = (∑ i in range n, 1) : by rw [sum_const, nsmul_one, card_range]
... ≤ ∑ i in range n, r ^ i : sum_le_sum (λ k _, this k) }
end
variables {K : Type*} [normed_field K] {ξ : K}
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, ξ ^ n) (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
begin
have xi_ne_one : ξ ≠ 1, by { contrapose! h, simp [h] },
have A : tendsto (λn, (ξ ^ n - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹)),
from ((tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds,
have B : (λ n, (∑ i in range n, ξ ^ i)) = (λ n, geom_series ξ n) := rfl,
rw [has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm, B],
{ simpa [geom_sum, xi_ne_one, neg_inv] using A },
{ simp [normed_field.norm_pow, summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h] }
end
lemma summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, ξ ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : (∑'n:ℕ, ξ ^ n) = (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
(has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h).tsum_eq
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
lemma summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
lemma tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) : (∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n) = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
/-- A geometric series in a normed field is summable iff the norm of the common ratio is less than
one. -/
@[simp] lemma summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_1 : summable (λ n : ℕ, ξ ^ n) ↔ ∥ξ∥ < 1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1⟩,
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : dist (ξ ^ k) 0 < 1⟩ :=
(h.tendsto_cofinite_zero.eventually (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)).exists,
simp only [normed_field.norm_pow, dist_zero_right] at hk,
rw [← one_pow k] at hk,
exact lt_of_pow_lt_pow _ zero_le_one hk
end
end geometric
/-!
### Sequences with geometrically decaying distance in metric spaces
In this paragraph, we discuss sequences in metric spaces or emetric spaces for which the distance
between two consecutive terms decays geometrically. We show that such sequences are Cauchy
sequences, and bound their distances to the limit. We also discuss series with geometrically
decaying terms.
-/
section edist_le_geometric
variables [emetric_space α] (r C : ennreal) (hr : r < 1) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, edist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C * r^n)
include hr hC hu
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `C ≠ ∞`, `r < 1`,
then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.-/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
refine cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top _ hu _,
rw [ennreal.tsum_mul_left, ennreal.tsum_geometric],
refine ennreal.mul_ne_top hC (ennreal.inv_ne_top.2 _),
exact ne_of_gt (ennreal.zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 hr)
end
omit hr hC
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ (C * r^n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
convert edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ha _,
simp only [pow_add, ennreal.tsum_mul_left, ennreal.tsum_geometric, ennreal.div_def, mul_assoc]
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) :=
by simpa only [pow_zero, mul_one] using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hu ha 0
end edist_le_geometric
section edist_le_geometric_two
variables [emetric_space α] (C : ennreal) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, edist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C / 2^n) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a))
include hC hu
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.-/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric_two : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
simp only [ennreal.div_def, ennreal.inv_pow] at hu,
refine cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric 2⁻¹ C _ hC hu,
simp [ennreal.one_lt_two]
end
omit hC
include ha
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C * 2^-n`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ 2 * C / 2^n :=
begin
simp only [ennreal.div_def, ennreal.inv_pow] at hu,
rw [ennreal.div_def, mul_assoc, mul_comm, ennreal.inv_pow],
convert edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto 2⁻¹ C hu ha n,
rw [ennreal.one_sub_inv_two, ennreal.inv_inv]
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀: edist (f 0) a ≤ 2 * C :=
by simpa only [pow_zero, ennreal.div_def, ennreal.inv_one, mul_one]
using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto C hu ha 0
end edist_le_geometric_two
section le_geometric
variables [metric_space α] {r C : ℝ} (hr : r < 1) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, dist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C * r^n)
include hr hu
lemma aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric : has_sum (λ n : ℕ, C * r^n) (C / (1 - r)) :=
begin
have h0 : 0 ≤ C,
by simpa using le_trans dist_nonneg (hu 0),
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h0 with rfl | Cpos,
{ simp [has_sum_zero] },
{ have rnonneg: r ≥ 0, from nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left
(by simpa only [pow_one] using le_trans dist_nonneg (hu 1)) Cpos,
refine has_sum.mul_left C _,
by simpa using has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 rnonneg hr }
end
variables (r C)
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.
Note that this lemma does not assume `0 ≤ C` or `0 ≤ r`. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu ⟨_, aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) :=
(aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu).tsum_eq ▸
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu ⟨_, aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩ ha
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ (C * r^n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
have := aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu,
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ⟨_, this⟩ ha n,
simp only [pow_add, mul_left_comm C, mul_div_right_comm],
rw [mul_comm],
exact (this.mul_left _).tsum_eq.symm
end
omit hr hu
variable (hu₂ : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ (C / 2) / 2^n)
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric_two : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu₂ $ ⟨_, has_sum_geometric_two' C⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C :=
(tsum_geometric_two' C) ▸ dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha
include hu₂
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / 2^n`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ C / 2^n :=
begin
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha n,
simp only [add_comm n, pow_add, (div_div_eq_div_mul _ _ _).symm],
symmetry,
exact ((has_sum_geometric_two' C).mul_right _).tsum_eq
end
end le_geometric
section summable_le_geometric
variables [normed_group α] {r C : ℝ} {f : ℕ → α}
lemma dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ i in range n, f i) (∑ i in range (n+1), f i) ≤ C * r ^ n :=
begin
rw [sum_range_succ, dist_eq_norm, ← norm_neg],
convert hf n,
rw [neg_sub, add_sub_cancel]
end
/-- If `∥f n∥ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` form a
Cauchy sequence. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or `0 ≤ C`. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_geometric_bound (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n) :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset (ℕ), ∑ x in s, f x) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _
(aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf)).summable hf
/-- If `∥f n∥ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` are within
distance `C * r ^ n / (1 - r)` of the sum of the series. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or
`0 ≤ C`. -/
lemma norm_sub_le_of_geometric_bound_of_has_sum (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n)
{a : α} (ha : has_sum f a) (n : ℕ) :
∥(∑ x in finset.range n, f x) - a∥ ≤ (C * r ^ n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
rw ← dist_eq_norm,
apply dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf),
exact ha.tendsto_sum_nat
end
end summable_le_geometric
section normed_ring_geometric
variables {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [complete_space R]
open normed_space
/-- A geometric series in a complete normed ring is summable.
Proved above (same name, different namespace) for not-necessarily-complete normed fields. -/
lemma normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1
(x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) : summable (λ (n:ℕ), x ^ n) :=
begin
have h1 : summable (λ (n:ℕ), ∥x∥ ^ n) := summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually _ h1 _,
rw nat.cofinite_eq_at_top,
exact eventually_norm_pow_le x,
end
/-- Bound for the sum of a geometric series in a normed ring. This formula does not assume that the
normed ring satisfies the axiom `∥1∥ = 1`. -/
lemma normed_ring.tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1
(x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) : ∥(∑' (n:ℕ), x ^ n)∥ ≤ ∥(1:R)∥ - 1 + (1 - ∥x∥)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw tsum_eq_zero_add (normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h),
simp only [pow_zero],
refine le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) _,
have : ∥(∑' (b : ℕ), (λ n, x ^ (n + 1)) b)∥ ≤ (1 - ∥x∥)⁻¹ - 1,
{ refine tsum_of_norm_bounded _ (λ b, norm_pow_le' _ (nat.succ_pos b)),
convert (has_sum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr (has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg x) h),
simp },
linarith
end
lemma geom_series_mul_neg (x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) :
(∑' (i:ℕ), x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 :=
begin
have := has_sum_of_bounded_monoid_hom_of_summable
(normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h) (∥1 - x∥)
(mul_right_bound (1 - x)),
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat _,
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 1 - x ^ n) at_top (nhds 1),
{ simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub
(tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h) },
convert ← this,
ext n,
rw [←geom_sum_mul_neg, geom_series_def, finset.sum_mul],
simp,
end
lemma mul_neg_geom_series (x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) :
(1 - x) * (∑' (i:ℕ), x ^ i) = 1 :=
begin
have := has_sum_of_bounded_monoid_hom_of_summable
(normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h) (∥1 - x∥)
(mul_left_bound (1 - x)),
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat _,
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 1 - x ^ n) at_top (nhds 1),
{ simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub
(tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h) },
convert ← this,
ext n,
rw [←mul_neg_geom_sum, geom_series_def, finset.mul_sum],
simp,
end
end normed_ring_geometric
/-! ### Positive sequences with small sums on encodable types -/
/-- For any positive `ε`, define on an encodable type a positive sequence with sum less than `ε` -/
def pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε)
(ι) [encodable ι] : {ε' : ι → ℝ // (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃ c, has_sum ε' c ∧ c ≤ ε} :=
begin
let f := λ n, (ε / 2) / 2 ^ n,
have hf : has_sum f ε := has_sum_geometric_two' _,
have f0 : ∀ n, 0 < f n := λ n, div_pos (half_pos hε) (pow_pos zero_lt_two _),
refine ⟨f ∘ encodable.encode, λ i, f0 _, _⟩,
rcases hf.summable.comp_injective (@encodable.encode_injective ι _) with ⟨c, hg⟩,
refine ⟨c, hg, has_sum_le_inj _ (@encodable.encode_injective ι _) _ _ hg hf⟩,
{ assume i _, exact le_of_lt (f0 _) },
{ assume n, exact le_refl _ }
end
namespace nnreal
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : nnreal} (hε : 0 < ε) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → nnreal, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃c, has_sum ε' c ∧ c < ε :=
let ⟨a, a0, aε⟩ := exists_between hε in
let ⟨ε', hε', c, hc, hcε⟩ := pos_sum_of_encodable a0 ι in
⟨ λi, ⟨ε' i, le_of_lt $ hε' i⟩, assume i, nnreal.coe_lt_coe.2 $ hε' i,
⟨c, has_sum_le (assume i, le_of_lt $ hε' i) has_sum_zero hc ⟩, nnreal.has_sum_coe.1 hc,
lt_of_le_of_lt (nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 hcε) aε ⟩
end nnreal
namespace ennreal
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ennreal} (hε : 0 < ε) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → nnreal, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ (∑' i, (ε' i : ennreal)) < ε :=
begin
rcases exists_between hε with ⟨r, h0r, hrε⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hrε with ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩,
rcases nnreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable (coe_lt_coe.1 h0r) ι with ⟨ε', hp, c, hc, hcr⟩,
exact ⟨ε', hp, (ennreal.tsum_coe_eq hc).symm ▸ lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 hcr) hrε⟩
end
end ennreal
/-!
### Factorial
-/
lemma factorial_tendsto_at_top : tendsto nat.factorial at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone nat.monotone_factorial (λ n, ⟨n, n.self_le_factorial⟩)
lemma tendsto_factorial_div_pow_self_at_top : tendsto (λ n, n! / n^n : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'
tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat 1)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ n, div_nonneg (by exact_mod_cast n.factorial_pos.le)
(pow_nonneg (by exact_mod_cast n.zero_le) _))
begin
rw eventually_iff_exists_mem,
use [set.Ioi 0, Ioi_mem_at_top 0],
rintros n (hn : 0 < n),
rcases nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne.symm with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
rw [← prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial, pow_eq_prod_const, div_eq_mul_inv, ← inv_eq_one_div, prod_nat_cast,
nat.cast_succ, ← prod_inv_distrib', ← prod_mul_distrib, finset.prod_range_succ'],
simp only [prod_range_succ', one_mul, nat.cast_add, zero_add, nat.cast_one],
refine mul_le_of_le_one_left (inv_nonneg.mpr $ by exact_mod_cast hn.le) (prod_le_one _ _);
intros x hx;
rw finset.mem_range at hx,
{ refine mul_nonneg _ (inv_nonneg.mpr _); norm_cast; linarith },
{ refine (div_le_one $ by exact_mod_cast hn).mpr _, norm_cast, linarith }
end
/-!
### Harmonic series
Here we define the harmonic series and prove some basic lemmas about it,
leading to a proof of its divergence to +∞ -/
/-- The harmonic series `1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/n`-/
def harmonic_series (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
∑ i in range n, 1/(i+1 : ℝ)
lemma mono_harmonic : monotone harmonic_series :=
begin
intros p q hpq,
apply sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg,
rwa range_subset,
intros x h _,
exact le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat,
end
lemma half_le_harmonic_double_sub_harmonic (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
1/2 ≤ harmonic_series (2*n) - harmonic_series n :=
begin
suffices : harmonic_series n + 1 / 2 ≤ harmonic_series (n + n),
{ rw two_mul,
linarith },
have : harmonic_series n + ∑ k in Ico n (n + n), 1/(k + 1 : ℝ) = harmonic_series (n + n) :=
sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ (show n ≤ n+n, by linarith),
rw [← this, add_le_add_iff_left],
have : ∑ k in Ico n (n + n), 1/(n+n : ℝ) = 1/2,
{ have : (n : ℝ) + n ≠ 0,
{ norm_cast, linarith },
rw [sum_const, Ico.card],
field_simp [this],
ring },
rw ← this,
apply sum_le_sum,
intros x hx,
rw one_div_le_one_div,
{ exact_mod_cast nat.succ_le_of_lt (Ico.mem.mp hx).2 },
{ norm_cast, linarith },
{ exact_mod_cast nat.zero_lt_succ x }
end
lemma self_div_two_le_harmonic_two_pow (n : ℕ) : (n / 2 : ℝ) ≤ harmonic_series (2^n) :=
begin
induction n with n hn,
unfold harmonic_series,
simp only [one_div, nat.cast_zero, zero_div, nat.cast_succ, sum_singleton,
inv_one, zero_add, pow_zero, range_one, zero_le_one],
have : harmonic_series (2^n) + 1 / 2 ≤ harmonic_series (2^(n+1)),
{ have := half_le_harmonic_double_sub_harmonic (2^n) (by {apply pow_pos, linarith}),
rw [nat.mul_comm, ← pow_succ'] at this,
linarith },
apply le_trans _ this,
rw (show (n.succ / 2 : ℝ) = (n/2 : ℝ) + (1/2), by field_simp),
linarith,
end
/-- The harmonic series diverges to +∞ -/
theorem harmonic_tendsto_at_top : tendsto harmonic_series at_top at_top :=
begin
suffices : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, harmonic_series (2^n)) at_top at_top, by
{ exact tendsto_at_top_of_monotone_of_subseq mono_harmonic this },
apply tendsto_at_top_mono self_div_two_le_harmonic_two_pow,
apply tendsto_at_top_div,
norm_num,
exact tendsto_coe_nat_at_top_at_top
end
|
4878fbb2c02112e79298237f23810bec142105ef | 8b9f17008684d796c8022dab552e42f0cb6fb347 | /hott/init/axioms/funext_varieties.hlean | c1a8e1faa6ac71e60f93dc7654f84397519bd77c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | chubbymaggie/lean | 0d06ae25f9dd396306fb02190e89422ea94afd7b | d2c7b5c31928c98f545b16420d37842c43b4ae9a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,313,622,901 | 1,430,266,839,000 | 1,430,267,083,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,350 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: init.axioms.funext_varieties
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
Ported from Coq HoTT
-/
prelude
import ..path ..trunc ..equiv
open eq is_trunc sigma function
/- In init.axioms.funext, we defined function extensionality to be the assertion
that the map apD10 is an equivalence. We now prove that this follows
from a couple of weaker-looking forms of function extensionality. We do
require eta conversion, which Coq 8.4+ has judgmentally.
This proof is originally due to Voevodsky; it has since been simplified
by Peter Lumsdaine and Michael Shulman. -/
definition funext.{l k} :=
Π ⦃A : Type.{l}⦄ {P : A → Type.{k}} (f g : Π x, P x), is_equiv (@apD10 A P f g)
-- Naive funext is the simple assertion that pointwise equal functions are equal.
-- TODO think about universe levels
definition naive_funext :=
Π ⦃A : Type⦄ {P : A → Type} (f g : Πx, P x), (f ∼ g) → f = g
-- Weak funext says that a product of contractible types is contractible.
definition weak_funext :=
Π ⦃A : Type⦄ (P : A → Type) [H: Πx, is_contr (P x)], is_contr (Πx, P x)
definition weak_funext_of_naive_funext : naive_funext → weak_funext :=
(λ nf A P (Pc : Πx, is_contr (P x)),
let c := λx, center (P x) in
is_contr.mk c (λ f,
have eq' : (λx, center (P x)) ∼ f,
from (λx, contr (f x)),
have eq : (λx, center (P x)) = f,
from nf A P (λx, center (P x)) f eq',
eq
)
)
/- The less obvious direction is that WeakFunext implies Funext
(and hence all three are logically equivalent). The point is that under weak
funext, the space of "pointwise homotopies" has the same universal property as
the space of paths. -/
section
universe variables l k
parameters [wf : weak_funext.{l k}] {A : Type.{l}} {B : A → Type.{k}} (f : Π x, B x)
definition is_contr_sigma_homotopy [instance] : is_contr (Σ (g : Π x, B x), f ∼ g) :=
is_contr.mk (sigma.mk f (homotopy.refl f))
(λ dp, sigma.rec_on dp
(λ (g : Π x, B x) (h : f ∼ g),
let r := λ (k : Π x, Σ y, f x = y),
@sigma.mk _ (λg, f ∼ g)
(λx, pr1 (k x)) (λx, pr2 (k x)) in
let s := λ g h x, @sigma.mk _ (λy, f x = y) (g x) (h x) in
have t1 : Πx, is_contr (Σ y, f x = y),
from (λx, !is_contr_sigma_eq),
have t2 : is_contr (Πx, Σ y, f x = y),
from !wf,
have t3 : (λ x, @sigma.mk _ (λ y, f x = y) (f x) idp) = s g h,
from @center_eq (Π x, Σ y, f x = y) t2 _ _,
have t4 : r (λ x, sigma.mk (f x) idp) = r (s g h),
from ap r t3,
have endt : sigma.mk f (homotopy.refl f) = sigma.mk g h,
from t4,
endt
)
)
parameters (Q : Π g (h : f ∼ g), Type) (d : Q f (homotopy.refl f))
definition homotopy_ind (g : Πx, B x) (h : f ∼ g) : Q g h :=
@transport _ (λ gh, Q (pr1 gh) (pr2 gh)) (sigma.mk f (homotopy.refl f)) (sigma.mk g h)
(@center_eq _ is_contr_sigma_homotopy _ _) d
local attribute weak_funext [reducible]
local attribute homotopy_ind [reducible]
definition homotopy_ind_comp : homotopy_ind f (homotopy.refl f) = d :=
(@hprop_eq_of_is_contr _ _ _ _ !center_eq idp)⁻¹ ▹ idp
end
-- Now the proof is fairly easy; we can just use the same induction principle on both sides.
universe variables l k
local attribute weak_funext [reducible]
theorem funext_of_weak_funext (wf : weak_funext.{l k}) : funext.{l k} :=
λ A B f g,
let eq_to_f := (λ g' x, f = g') in
let sim2path := homotopy_ind f eq_to_f idp in
assert t1 : sim2path f (homotopy.refl f) = idp,
proof homotopy_ind_comp f eq_to_f idp qed,
assert t2 : apD10 (sim2path f (homotopy.refl f)) = (homotopy.refl f),
proof ap apD10 t1 qed,
have sect : apD10 ∘ (sim2path g) ∼ id,
proof (homotopy_ind f (λ g' x, apD10 (sim2path g' x) = x) t2) g qed,
have retr : (sim2path g) ∘ apD10 ∼ id,
from (λ h, eq.rec_on h (homotopy_ind_comp f _ idp)),
is_equiv.adjointify apD10 (sim2path g) sect retr
definition funext_from_naive_funext : naive_funext -> funext :=
compose funext_of_weak_funext weak_funext_of_naive_funext
|
86e0b3a42b8d3991a1685e1f491735efc4a44b85 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/data/padics/padic_numbers.lean | b13725cb3a0cdef44424aaef8f78db6c29d86e4a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,165 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.padics.padic_norm
import analysis.normed_space.basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the p-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_p` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the p-adic norm.
We show that the p-adic norm on ℚ extends to `ℚ_p`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_p`,
and that `ℚ_p` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `padic` : the type of p-adic numbers
* `padic_norm_e` : the rational valued p-adic norm on `ℚ_p`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the p-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[fact (prime p)]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct ℝ.
`ℚ_p` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on ℚ to `ℚ_p` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to ℝ,
and hence the proof that `ℚ_p` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
A small special-purpose simplification tactic, `padic_index_simp`, is used to manipulate sequence
indices in the proof that the norm extends.
`padic_norm_e` is the rational-valued p-adic norm on `ℚ_p`.
To instantiate `ℚ_p` as a normed field, we must cast this into a ℝ-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `∥ ∥` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padic_norm` to `padic_norm_e` when possible.
Since `padic_norm_e` and `∥ ∥` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_p` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouêva, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open nat multiplicity padic_norm cau_seq cau_seq.completion metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the p-adic norm. -/
@[reducible] def padic_seq (p : ℕ) := cau_seq _ (padic_norm p)
namespace padic_seq
section
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
/-- The p-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
lemma stationary {f : cau_seq ℚ (padic_norm p)} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padic_norm p (f n) = padic_norm p (f m) :=
have ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padic_norm p (f j),
from cau_seq.abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero $ not_lim_zero_of_not_congr_zero hf,
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this,
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := cau_seq.cauchy₂ f hε in
⟨ max N1 N2,
λ n m hn hm,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < ε, from hN2 _ _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 (max_le_iff.1 hm).2,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < padic_norm p (f n),
from lt_of_lt_of_le this $ hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < max (padic_norm p (f n)) (padic_norm p (f m)),
from lt_max_iff.2 (or.inl this),
begin
by_contradiction hne,
rw ←padic_norm.neg p (f m) at hne,
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne p hne,
rw [padic_norm.neg, max_comm] at hnam,
rw [←hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this,
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this
end ⟩
/-- For all n ≥ stationary_point f hf, the p-adic norm of f n is the same. -/
def stationary_point {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
classical.some $ stationary hf
lemma stationary_point_spec {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n}, stationary_point hf ≤ m → stationary_point hf ≤ n →
padic_norm p (f n) = padic_norm p (f m) :=
classical.some_spec $ stationary hf
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : padic_seq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf))
lemma norm_zero_iff (f : padic_seq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
begin
constructor,
{ intro h,
by_contradiction hf,
unfold norm at h, split_ifs at h,
apply hf,
intros ε hε,
existsi stationary_point hf,
intros j hj,
have heq := stationary_point_spec hf (le_refl _) hj,
simpa [h, heq] },
{ intro h,
simp [norm, h] }
end
end
section embedding
open cau_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
lemma equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : padic_seq p}
(h : ∀ k, padic_norm p (f k) = padic_norm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 :=
λ ε hε, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε in
⟨i, λ j hj, by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
lemma norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
lemma norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padic_norm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padic_norm p (f $ stationary_point hf), by simp [norm, hf],
⟨f $ stationary_point hf, heq,
λ h, norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
lemma not_lim_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬ lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) q) :=
λ h', hq $ const_lim_zero.1 h'
lemma not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬ (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0 :=
λ h : lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) q - 0), not_lim_zero_const_of_nonzero hq $ by simpa using h
lemma norm_nonneg (f : padic_seq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm]
else by simp [norm, hf, padic_norm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_left_left {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max (stationary_point hf) (max v2 v3))) :=
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_max_left },
{ apply le_refl }
end
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_left {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max v1 (max (stationary_point hf) v3))) :=
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_trans,
{ apply le_max_left _ v3 },
{ apply le_max_right } },
{ apply le_refl }
end
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_right {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationary_point hf)))) :=
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_trans,
{ apply le_max_right v2 },
{ apply le_max_right } },
{ apply le_refl }
end
end embedding
section valuation
open cau_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `padic_seq` -/
/--
The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `padic_seq p`.
`valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`.
-/
def valuation (f : padic_seq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padic_val_rat p (f (stationary_point hf))
lemma norm_eq_pow_val {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
f.norm = p^(-f.valuation : ℤ) :=
begin
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padic_norm, if_neg],
intro H,
apply cau_seq.not_lim_zero_of_not_congr_zero hf,
intros ε hε,
use (stationary_point hf),
intros n hn,
rw stationary_point_spec hf (le_refl _) hn,
simpa [H] using hε,
end
lemma val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm :=
begin
rw [norm_eq_pow_val hf, norm_eq_pow_val hg, ← neg_inj, fpow_inj],
{ exact_mod_cast (fact.out p.prime).pos },
{ exact_mod_cast (fact.out p.prime).ne_one },
end
end valuation
end padic_seq
section
open padic_seq
private meta def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : interactive.loc := interactive.loc.ns [none]) : tactic unit :=
do [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mmap
(λ n, tactic.mk_app ``stationary_point [n] <|> return n),
e1 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return `(true),
e2 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return `(true),
e3 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return `(true),
sl ← [e1, e2, e3].mfoldl (λ s e, simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk,
when at_.include_goal (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip),
hs ← at_.get_locals, hs.mmap' (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/--
This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts padic_norm (f (stationary_point f)) to
padic_norm (f (max _ _ _)).
-/
meta def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic unit :=
do [h, f, g] ← l.mmap tactic.i_to_expr,
index_simp_core h f g at_
end
namespace padic_seq
section embedding
open cau_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime]
include hp
lemma norm_mul (f g : padic_seq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : f * g ≈ 0, from mul_equiv_zero' _ hf,
by simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have hf : f * g ≈ 0, from mul_equiv_zero _ hg,
by simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else
have hfg : ¬ f * g ≈ 0, by apply mul_not_equiv_zero; assumption,
begin
unfold norm,
split_ifs,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg],
apply padic_norm.mul
end
lemma eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : padic_seq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
lemma ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : padic_seq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬ f ≈ 0 :=
not_iff_not.2 (eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _)
lemma norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padic_norm p) q) = padic_norm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then
have (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0,
by simp [hq]; apply setoid.refl (const (padic_norm p) 0),
by subst hq; simp [norm, this]
else
have ¬ (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0, from not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq,
by simp [norm, this]
lemma norm_values_discrete (a : padic_seq p) (ha : ¬ a ≈ 0) :
(∃ (z : ℤ), a.norm = ↑p ^ (-z)) :=
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha in
by simpa [hk] using padic_norm.values_discrete p hk'
lemma norm_one : norm (1 : padic_seq p) = 1 :=
have h1 : ¬ (1 : padic_seq p) ≈ 0, from one_not_equiv_zero _,
by simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
private lemma norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) ≠ padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)))
(hlt : padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) < padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf))) :
false :=
begin
have hpn : 0 < padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) - padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)),
from sub_pos_of_lt hlt,
cases hfg _ hpn with N hN,
let i := max N (max (stationary_point hf) (stationary_point hg)),
have hi : N ≤ i, from le_max_left _ _,
have hN' := hN _ hi,
padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt,
have hpne : padic_norm p (f i) ≠ padic_norm p (-(g i)),
by rwa [ ←padic_norm.neg p (g i)] at h,
let hpnem := add_eq_max_of_ne p hpne,
have hpeq : padic_norm p ((f - g) i) = max (padic_norm p (f i)) (padic_norm p (g i)),
{ rwa padic_norm.neg at hpnem },
rw [hpeq, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt] at hN',
have : padic_norm p (f i) < padic_norm p (f i),
{ apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN', apply sub_le_self, apply padic_norm.nonneg },
exact lt_irrefl _ this
end
private lemma norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) = padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) :=
begin
by_contradiction h,
cases (decidable.em (padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) <
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf))))
with hlt hnlt,
{ exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt },
{ apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (setoid.symm hfg) (ne.symm h),
apply lt_of_le_of_ne,
apply le_of_not_gt hnlt,
apply h }
end
theorem norm_equiv {f g : padic_seq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : g ≈ 0, from setoid.trans (setoid.symm hfg) hf,
by simp [norm, hf, hg]
else have hg : ¬ g ≈ 0, from hf ∘ setoid.trans hfg,
by unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private lemma norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : padic_seq p}
(hfg : ¬ f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm) :=
begin
unfold norm, split_ifs,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg],
apply padic_norm.nonarchimedean
end
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : padic_seq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm) :=
if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then
have 0 ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm), from le_max_left_of_le (norm_nonneg _),
by simpa only [hfg, norm, ne.def, le_max_iff, cau_seq.add_apply, not_true, dif_pos]
else if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g,
{ change lim_zero (f - 0) at hf,
show lim_zero (f + g - g), by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel] using hf },
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm, from norm_equiv hfg',
have hcl : f.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf,
have max (f.norm) (g.norm) = g.norm,
by rw hcl; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _),
by rw [this, hcfg]
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f,
{ change lim_zero (g - 0) at hg,
show lim_zero (f + g - f), by simpa only [add_sub_cancel', sub_zero] using hg },
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm, from norm_equiv hfg',
have hcl : g.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg,
have max (f.norm) (g.norm) = f.norm,
by rw hcl; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _),
by rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
lemma norm_eq {f g : padic_seq p} (h : ∀ k, padic_norm p (f k) = padic_norm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : g ≈ 0, from equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf,
by simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
else
have hg : ¬ g ≈ 0, from λ hg, hf $ equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero
(by simp only [h, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true]) hg,
begin
simp only [hg, hf, norm, dif_neg, not_false_iff],
let i := max (stationary_point hf) (stationary_point hg),
have hpf : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) = padic_norm p (f i),
{ apply stationary_point_spec, apply le_max_left, apply le_refl },
have hpg : padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) = padic_norm p (g i),
{ apply stationary_point_spec, apply le_max_right, apply le_refl },
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
end
lemma norm_neg (a : padic_seq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq $ by simp
lemma norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : padic_seq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm :=
have lim_zero (f + g - 0), from h,
have f ≈ -g, from show lim_zero (f - (-g)), by simpa only [sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add],
have f.norm = (-g).norm, from norm_equiv this,
by simpa only [norm_neg] using this
lemma add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : padic_seq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm :=
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0, from mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne,
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have lim_zero (f - 0), from hf,
have f + g ≈ g, from show lim_zero ((f + g) - g), by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel],
have h1 : (f+g).norm = g.norm, from norm_equiv this,
have h2 : f.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf,
by rw [h1, h2]; rw max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have lim_zero (g - 0), from hg,
have f + g ≈ f, from show lim_zero ((f + g) - f), by rw [add_sub_cancel']; simpa only [sub_zero],
have h1 : (f+g).norm = f.norm, from norm_equiv this,
have h2 : g.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg,
by rw [h1, h2]; rw max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
else
begin
unfold norm at ⊢ hfgne, split_ifs at ⊢ hfgne,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at ⊢ hfgne,
exact padic_norm.add_eq_max_of_ne p hfgne
end
end embedding
end padic_seq
/-- The p-adic numbers `Q_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the p-adic norm. -/
def padic (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] := @cau_seq.completion.Cauchy _ _ _ _ (padic_norm p) _
notation `ℚ_[` p `]` := padic p
namespace padic
section completion
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
/-- The discrete field structure on `ℚ_p` is inherited from the Cauchy completion construction. -/
instance field : field (ℚ_[p]) :=
cau_seq.completion.field
instance : inhabited ℚ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : has_zero ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_one ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_add ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_mul ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_sub ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_neg ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_div ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_group ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : comm_ring ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
/-- Builds the equivalence class of a Cauchy sequence of rationals. -/
def mk : padic_seq p → ℚ_[p] := quotient.mk
end completion
section completion
variables (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime]
lemma mk_eq {f g : padic_seq p} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g := quotient.eq
/-- Embeds the rational numbers in the p-adic numbers. -/
def of_rat : ℚ → ℚ_[p] := cau_seq.completion.of_rat
@[simp] lemma of_rat_add : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x + y) = of_rat p x + of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_add
@[simp] lemma of_rat_neg : ∀ (x : ℚ), of_rat p (-x) = -of_rat p x :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_neg
@[simp] lemma of_rat_mul : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x * y) = of_rat p x * of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_mul
@[simp] lemma of_rat_sub : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x - y) = of_rat p x - of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_sub
@[simp] lemma of_rat_div : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x / y) = of_rat p x / of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_div
@[simp] lemma of_rat_one : of_rat p 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_rat_zero : of_rat p 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma cast_eq_of_rat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : (↑n : ℚ_[p]) = of_rat p n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ refl },
{ simpa using ih }
end
lemma cast_eq_of_rat_of_int (n : ℤ) : ↑n = of_rat p n :=
by induction n; simp [cast_eq_of_rat_of_nat]
lemma cast_eq_of_rat : ∀ (q : ℚ), (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = of_rat p q
| ⟨n, d, h1, h2⟩ :=
show ↑n / ↑d = _, from
have (⟨n, d, h1, h2⟩ : ℚ) = rat.mk n d, from rat.num_denom',
by simp [this, rat.mk_eq_div, of_rat_div, cast_eq_of_rat_of_int, cast_eq_of_rat_of_nat]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_add : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x + y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x + ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_neg : ∀ {x : ℚ}, (↑(-x) : ℚ_[p]) = -↑x := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_mul : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x * y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x * ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x - y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x - ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_div : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x / y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x / ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_one : (↑1 : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : (↑0 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
lemma const_equiv {q r : ℚ} : const (padic_norm p) q ≈ const (padic_norm p) r ↔ q = r :=
⟨ λ heq : lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) (q - r)),
eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ const_lim_zero.1 heq,
λ heq, by rw heq; apply setoid.refl _ ⟩
lemma of_rat_eq {q r : ℚ} : of_rat p q = of_rat p r ↔ q = r :=
⟨(const_equiv p).1 ∘ quotient.eq.1, λ h, by rw h⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_inj {q r : ℚ} : (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = ↑r ↔ q = r :=
by simp [cast_eq_of_rat, of_rat_eq]
instance : char_zero ℚ_[p] :=
⟨λ m n, by { rw ← rat.cast_coe_nat, norm_cast, exact id }⟩
end completion
end padic
/-- The rational-valued p-adic norm on `ℚ_p` is lifted from the norm on Cauchy sequences. The
canonical form of this function is the normed space instance, with notation `∥ ∥`. -/
def padic_norm_e {p : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime] : ℚ_[p] → ℚ :=
quotient.lift padic_seq.norm $ @padic_seq.norm_equiv _ _
namespace padic_norm_e
section embedding
open padic_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
lemma defn (f : padic_seq p) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (⟦f⟧ - f i) < ε :=
begin
simp only [padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
change ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε,
by_contradiction h,
cases cauchy₂ f hε with N hN,
have : ∀ N, ∃ i ≥ N, ε ≤ (f - const _ (f i)).norm,
by simpa only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt] using h,
rcases this N with ⟨i, hi, hge⟩,
have hne : ¬ (f - const (padic_norm p) (f i)) ≈ 0,
{ intro h, unfold padic_seq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge, exact not_lt_of_ge hge hε },
unfold padic_seq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge,
apply not_le_of_gt _ hge,
cases decidable.em (N ≤ stationary_point hne) with hgen hngen,
{ apply hN; assumption },
{ have := stationary_point_spec hne (le_refl _) (le_of_not_le hngen),
rw ←this,
apply hN,
apply le_refl, assumption }
end
protected lemma nonneg (q : ℚ_[p]) : 0 ≤ padic_norm_e q :=
quotient.induction_on q $ norm_nonneg
lemma zero_def : (0 : ℚ_[p]) = ⟦0⟧ := rfl
lemma zero_iff (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e q = 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
quotient.induction_on q $
by simpa only [zero_def, quotient.eq] using norm_zero_iff
@[simp] protected lemma zero : padic_norm_e (0 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 :=
(zero_iff _).2 rfl
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
@[simp] protected lemma one' : padic_norm_e (1 : ℚ_[p]) = 1 :=
norm_one
@[simp] protected lemma neg (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (-q) = padic_norm_e q :=
quotient.induction_on q $ norm_neg
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
theorem nonarchimedean' (q r : ℚ_[p]) :
padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ norm_nonarchimedean
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne' {q r : ℚ_[p]} :
padic_norm_e q ≠ padic_norm_e r → padic_norm_e (q + r) = max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ λ _ _, padic_seq.add_eq_max_of_ne
lemma triangle_ineq (x y z : ℚ_[p]) :
padic_norm_e (x - z) ≤ padic_norm_e (x - y) + padic_norm_e (y - z) :=
calc padic_norm_e (x - z) = padic_norm_e ((x - y) + (y - z)) : by rw sub_add_sub_cancel
... ≤ max (padic_norm_e (x - y)) (padic_norm_e (y - z)) : padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean' _ _
... ≤ padic_norm_e (x - y) + padic_norm_e (y - z) :
max_le_add_of_nonneg (padic_norm_e.nonneg _) (padic_norm_e.nonneg _)
protected lemma add (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ (padic_norm_e q) + (padic_norm_e r) :=
calc
padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) : nonarchimedean' _ _
... ≤ (padic_norm_e q) + (padic_norm_e r) :
max_le_add_of_nonneg (padic_norm_e.nonneg _) (padic_norm_e.nonneg _)
protected lemma mul' (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q * r) = (padic_norm_e q) * (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ norm_mul
instance : is_absolute_value (@padic_norm_e p _) :=
{ abv_nonneg := padic_norm_e.nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := zero_iff,
abv_add := padic_norm_e.add,
abv_mul := padic_norm_e.mul' }
@[simp] lemma eq_padic_norm' (q : ℚ) : padic_norm_e (padic.of_rat p q) = padic_norm p q :=
norm_const _
protected theorem image' {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, padic_norm_e q = p ^ (-n) :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ f hf,
have ¬ f ≈ 0, from (ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf,
norm_values_discrete f this
lemma sub_rev (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q - r) = padic_norm_e (r - q) :=
by rw ←(padic_norm_e.neg); simp
end embedding
end padic_norm_e
namespace padic
section complete
open padic_seq padic
theorem rat_dense' {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime] (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ r : ℚ, padic_norm_e (q - r) < ε :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ q',
have ∃ N, ∀ m n ≥ N, padic_norm p (q' m - q' n) < ε, from cauchy₂ _ hε,
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := this in
⟨q' N,
begin
simp only [padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
change padic_seq.norm (q' - const _ (q' N)) < ε,
cases decidable.em ((q' - const (padic_norm p) (q' N)) ≈ 0) with heq hne',
{ simpa only [heq, padic_seq.norm, dif_pos] },
{ simp only [padic_seq.norm, dif_neg hne'],
change padic_norm p (q' _ - q' _) < ε,
have := stationary_point_spec hne',
cases decidable.em (stationary_point hne' ≤ N) with hle hle,
{ have := eq.symm (this (le_refl _) hle),
simp only [const_apply, sub_apply, padic_norm.zero, sub_self] at this,
simpa only [this] },
{ apply hN,
apply le_of_lt, apply lt_of_not_ge, apply hle, apply le_refl }}
end⟩
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime] (f : cau_seq _ (@padic_norm_e p _))
open classical
private lemma div_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (1 / ((n + 1): ℚ)) :=
div_pos zero_lt_one (by exact_mod_cast succ_pos _)
/-- `lim_seq f`, for `f` a Cauchy sequence of `p`-adic numbers,
is a sequence of rationals with the same limit point as `f`. -/
def lim_seq : ℕ → ℚ := λ n, classical.some (rat_dense' (f n) (div_nat_pos n))
lemma exi_rat_seq_conv {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (f i - ((lim_seq f) i : ℚ_[p])) < ε :=
begin
refine (exists_nat_gt (1/ε)).imp (λ N hN i hi, _),
have h := classical.some_spec (rat_dense' (f i) (div_nat_pos i)),
refine lt_of_lt_of_le h ((div_le_iff' $ by exact_mod_cast succ_pos _).mpr _),
rw right_distrib,
apply le_add_of_le_of_nonneg,
{ exact (div_le_iff hε).mp (le_trans (le_of_lt hN) (by exact_mod_cast hi)) },
{ apply le_of_lt, simpa }
end
lemma exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy : is_cau_seq (padic_norm p) (lim_seq f) :=
assume ε hε,
have hε3 : 0 < ε / 3, from div_pos hε (by norm_num),
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f hε3,
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := f.cauchy₂ hε3 in
begin
existsi max N N2,
intros j hj,
suffices :
padic_norm_e ((↑(lim_seq f j) - f (max N N2)) + (f (max N N2) - lim_seq f (max N N2))) < ε,
{ ring_nf at this ⊢,
rw [← padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm', ← padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
exact_mod_cast this },
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ have : (3 : ℚ) ≠ 0, by norm_num,
have : ε = ε / 3 + ε / 3 + ε / 3,
{ field_simp [this], simp only [bit0, bit1, mul_add, mul_one] },
rw this,
apply add_lt_add,
{ suffices : padic_norm_e ((↑(lim_seq f j) - f j) + (f j - f (max N N2))) < ε / 3 + ε / 3,
by simpa only [sub_add_sub_cancel],
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ apply add_lt_add,
{ rw [padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
apply_mod_cast hN,
exact le_of_max_le_left hj },
{ apply hN2,
exact le_of_max_le_right hj,
apply le_max_right }}},
{ apply_mod_cast hN,
apply le_max_left }}}
end
private def lim' : padic_seq p := ⟨_, exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy f⟩
private def lim : ℚ_[p] := ⟦lim' f⟧
theorem complete' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (q - f i) < ε :=
⟨ lim f,
λ ε hε,
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f (show 0 < ε / 2, from div_pos hε (by norm_num)),
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := padic_norm_e.defn (lim' f) (show 0 < ε / 2, from div_pos hε (by norm_num)) in
begin
existsi max N N2,
intros i hi,
suffices : padic_norm_e ((lim f - lim' f i) + (lim' f i - f i)) < ε,
{ ring_nf at this; exact this },
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ have : ε = ε / 2 + ε / 2, by rw ←(add_self_div_two ε); simp,
rw this,
apply add_lt_add,
{ apply hN2, exact le_of_max_le_right hi },
{ rw_mod_cast [padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
apply hN,
exact le_of_max_le_left hi }}}
end ⟩
end complete
section normed_space
variables (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime]
instance : has_dist ℚ_[p] := ⟨λ x y, padic_norm_e (x - y)⟩
instance : metric_space ℚ_[p] :=
{ dist_self := by simp [dist],
dist_comm := λ x y, by unfold dist; rw ←padic_norm_e.neg (x - y); simp,
dist_triangle :=
begin
intros, unfold dist,
exact_mod_cast padic_norm_e.triangle_ineq _ _ _,
end,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero :=
begin
unfold dist, intros _ _ h,
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
apply (padic_norm_e.zero_iff _).1,
exact_mod_cast h
end }
instance : has_norm ℚ_[p] := ⟨λ x, padic_norm_e x⟩
instance : normed_field ℚ_[p] :=
{ dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl,
norm_mul' := by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul'] }
instance is_absolute_value : is_absolute_value (λ a : ℚ_[p], ∥a∥) :=
{ abv_nonneg := norm_nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := λ _, norm_eq_zero,
abv_add := norm_add_le,
abv_mul := by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul'] }
theorem rat_dense {p : ℕ} {hp : fact p.prime} (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ r : ℚ, ∥q - r∥ < ε :=
let ⟨ε', hε'l, hε'r⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε,
⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense' q (by simpa using hε'l) in
⟨r, lt_trans (by simpa [has_norm.norm] using hr) hε'r⟩
end normed_space
end padic
namespace padic_norm_e
section normed_space
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime]
include hp
@[simp] protected lemma mul (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q * r∥ = ∥q∥ * ∥r∥ :=
by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul']
protected lemma is_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ↑(padic_norm_e q) = ∥q∥ := rfl
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q + r∥ ≤ max (∥q∥) (∥r∥) :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
exact_mod_cast nonarchimedean' _ _
end
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℚ_[p]} (h : ∥q∥ ≠ ∥r∥) : ∥q+r∥ = max (∥q∥) (∥r∥) :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
apply_mod_cast add_eq_max_of_ne',
intro h',
apply h,
unfold has_norm.norm,
exact_mod_cast h'
end
@[simp] lemma eq_padic_norm (q : ℚ) : ∥(↑q : ℚ_[p])∥ = padic_norm p q :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
rw [← padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm', ← padic.cast_eq_of_rat]
end
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ_[p] :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨padic.of_rat p (p⁻¹), begin
have h0 : p ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (hp.1.pos),
have h1 : 1 < p := hp.1.one_lt,
rw [← padic.cast_eq_of_rat, eq_padic_norm],
simp only [padic_norm, inv_eq_zero],
simp only [if_neg] {discharger := `[exact_mod_cast h0]},
norm_cast,
simp only [padic_val_rat.inv] {discharger := `[exact_mod_cast h0]},
rw [neg_neg, padic_val_rat.padic_val_rat_self h1, gpow_one],
exact_mod_cast h1,
end⟩ }
@[simp] lemma norm_p : ∥(p : ℚ_[p])∥ = p⁻¹ :=
begin
have p₀ : p ≠ 0 := hp.1.ne_zero,
have p₁ : p ≠ 1 := hp.1.ne_one,
simp [p₀, p₁, norm, padic_norm, padic_val_rat, fpow_neg, padic.cast_eq_of_rat_of_nat],
end
lemma norm_p_lt_one : ∥(p : ℚ_[p])∥ < 1 :=
begin
rw [norm_p, inv_eq_one_div, div_lt_iff, one_mul],
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.one_lt },
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.pos }
end
@[simp] lemma norm_p_pow (n : ℤ) : ∥(p^n : ℚ_[p])∥ = p^-n :=
by rw [normed_field.norm_fpow, norm_p]; field_simp
protected theorem image {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, ∥q∥ = ↑((↑p : ℚ) ^ (-n)) :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ f hf,
have ¬ f ≈ 0, from (padic_seq.ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf,
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := padic_seq.norm_values_discrete f this in
⟨n, congr_arg coe hn⟩
protected lemma is_rat (q : ℚ_[p]) : ∃ q' : ℚ, ∥q∥ = ↑q' :=
if h : q = 0 then ⟨0, by simp [h]⟩
else let ⟨n, hn⟩ := padic_norm_e.image h in ⟨_, hn⟩
/--`rat_norm q`, for a `p`-adic number `q` is the `p`-adic norm of `q`, as rational number.
The lemma `padic_norm_e.eq_rat_norm` asserts `∥q∥ = rat_norm q`. -/
def rat_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ := classical.some (padic_norm_e.is_rat q)
lemma eq_rat_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q∥ = rat_norm q := classical.some_spec (padic_norm_e.is_rat q)
theorem norm_rat_le_one : ∀ {q : ℚ} (hq : ¬ p ∣ q.denom), ∥(q : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1
| ⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ := λ hq : ¬ p ∣ d,
if hnz : n = 0 then
have (⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ : ℚ) = 0,
from rat.zero_iff_num_zero.mpr hnz,
by norm_num [this]
else
begin
have hnz' : { rat . num := n, denom := d, pos := hn, cop := hd } ≠ 0,
from mt rat.zero_iff_num_zero.1 hnz,
rw [padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm],
norm_cast,
rw [padic_norm.eq_fpow_of_nonzero p hnz', padic_val_rat_def p hnz'],
have h : (multiplicity p d).get _ = 0, by simp [multiplicity_eq_zero_of_not_dvd, hq],
simp only, norm_cast,
rw_mod_cast [h, sub_zero],
apply fpow_le_one_of_nonpos,
{ exact_mod_cast le_of_lt hp.1.one_lt, },
{ apply neg_nonpos_of_nonneg, norm_cast, simp, }
end
theorem norm_int_le_one (z : ℤ) : ∥(z : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1 :=
suffices ∥((z : ℚ) : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1, by simpa,
norm_rat_le_one $ by simp [hp.1.ne_one]
lemma norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) : ∥(k : ℚ_[p])∥ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ k :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
contrapose! h,
apply le_of_eq,
rw eq_comm,
calc ∥(k : ℚ_[p])∥ = ∥((k : ℚ) : ℚ_[p])∥ : by { norm_cast }
... = padic_norm p k : padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm _
... = 1 : _,
rw padic_norm,
split_ifs with H,
{ exfalso,
apply h,
norm_cast at H,
rw H,
apply dvd_zero },
{ norm_cast at H ⊢,
convert gpow_zero _,
simp only [neg_eq_zero],
rw padic_val_rat.padic_val_rat_of_int _ hp.1.ne_one H,
norm_cast,
rw [← enat.coe_inj, enat.coe_get, enat.coe_zero],
apply multiplicity.multiplicity_eq_zero_of_not_dvd h } },
{ rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩,
push_cast,
rw padic_norm_e.mul,
calc _ ≤ ∥(p : ℚ_[p])∥ * 1 : mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (by simpa using norm_int_le_one _)
(norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
... < 1 : _,
{ rw [mul_one, padic_norm_e.norm_p],
apply inv_lt_one,
exact_mod_cast hp.1.one_lt }, },
end
lemma norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : ∥(k : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ ((↑p)^(-n : ℤ)) ↔ ↑(p^n) ∣ k :=
begin
have : (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) = ↑((p ^ (-n : ℤ) : ℚ)), {simp},
rw [show (k : ℚ_[p]) = ((k : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]), by norm_cast, eq_padic_norm, this],
norm_cast,
rw padic_norm.dvd_iff_norm_le,
end
lemma eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {p : ℕ} {hp : fact p.prime} {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]}
(h : ∥z1 + z2∥ < ∥z2∥) : ∥z1∥ = ∥z2∥ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne,
not_lt_of_ge (by rw padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_right) h
lemma eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {p : ℕ} {hp : fact p.prime} {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]}
(h : ∥z1 + z2∥ < ∥z1∥) : ∥z1∥ = ∥z2∥ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne,
not_lt_of_ge (by rw padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_left) h
end normed_space
end padic_norm_e
namespace padic
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
instance complete : cau_seq.is_complete ℚ_[p] norm :=
begin
split, intro f,
have cau_seq_norm_e : is_cau_seq padic_norm_e f,
{ intros ε hε,
let h := is_cau f ε (by exact_mod_cast hε),
unfold norm at h,
apply_mod_cast h },
cases padic.complete' ⟨f, cau_seq_norm_e⟩ with q hq,
existsi q,
intros ε hε,
cases exists_rat_btwn hε with ε' hε',
norm_cast at hε',
cases hq ε' hε'.1 with N hN, existsi N,
intros i hi, let h := hN i hi,
unfold norm,
rw_mod_cast [cau_seq.sub_apply, padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
refine lt_trans _ hε'.2,
exact_mod_cast hN i hi
end
lemma padic_norm_e_lim_le {f : cau_seq ℚ_[p] norm} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(hf : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ a) : ∥f.lim∥ ≤ a :=
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := setoid.symm (cau_seq.equiv_lim f) _ ha in
calc ∥f.lim∥ = ∥f.lim - f N + f N∥ : by simp
... ≤ max (∥f.lim - f N∥) (∥f N∥) : padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean _ _
... ≤ a : max_le (le_of_lt (hN _ (le_refl _))) (hf _)
/-!
### Valuation on `ℚ_[p]`
-/
/--
`padic.valuation` lifts the p-adic valuation on rationals to `ℚ_[p]`.
-/
def valuation : ℚ_[p] → ℤ :=
quotient.lift (@padic_seq.valuation p _) (λ f g h,
begin
by_cases hf : f ≈ 0,
{ have hg : g ≈ 0, from setoid.trans (setoid.symm h) hf,
simp [hf, hg, padic_seq.valuation] },
{ have hg : ¬ g ≈ 0, from (λ hg, hf (setoid.trans h hg)),
rw padic_seq.val_eq_iff_norm_eq hf hg,
exact padic_seq.norm_equiv h },
end)
@[simp] lemma valuation_zero : valuation (0 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 :=
dif_pos ((const_equiv p).2 rfl)
@[simp] lemma valuation_one : valuation (1 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 :=
begin
change dite (cau_seq.const (padic_norm p) 1 ≈ _) _ _ = _,
have h : ¬ cau_seq.const (padic_norm p) 1 ≈ 0,
{ assume H, erw const_equiv p at H, exact one_ne_zero H },
rw dif_neg h,
simp,
end
lemma norm_eq_pow_val {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ≠ 0 → ∥x∥ = p^(-x.valuation) :=
begin
apply quotient.induction_on' x, clear x,
intros f hf,
change (padic_seq.norm _ : ℝ) = (p : ℝ) ^ -padic_seq.valuation _,
rw padic_seq.norm_eq_pow_val,
change ↑((p : ℚ) ^ -padic_seq.valuation f) = (p : ℝ) ^ -padic_seq.valuation f,
{ rw rat.cast_fpow,
congr' 1,
norm_cast },
{ apply cau_seq.not_lim_zero_of_not_congr_zero,
contrapose! hf,
apply quotient.sound,
simpa using hf, }
end
@[simp] lemma valuation_p : valuation (p : ℚ_[p]) = 1 :=
begin
have h : (1 : ℝ) < p := by exact_mod_cast (fact.out p.prime).one_lt,
rw ← neg_inj,
apply (fpow_strict_mono h).injective,
dsimp only,
rw ← norm_eq_pow_val,
{ simp },
{ exact_mod_cast (fact.out p.prime).ne_zero }
end
end padic
|
f9ce5b048542e150d195f12f757b82e75b302d5b | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/ring_theory/ideal/operations.lean | b5fe2f015cec76047f996a0d9622cfd11643b5c2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 66,969 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.algebra.operations
import algebra.algebra.tower
import data.equiv.ring
import data.nat.choose.sum
import ring_theory.ideal.basic
import ring_theory.non_zero_divisors
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
universes u v w x
open_locale big_operators
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
instance has_scalar' : has_scalar (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ I N, ⨆ r : I, N.map (r.1 • linear_map.id)⟩
/-- `N.annihilator` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • N = 0`. -/
def annihilator (N : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
(linear_map.lsmul R N).ker
/-- `N.colon P` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • P ⊆ N`. -/
def colon (N P : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
annihilator (P.map N.mkq)
variables {I J : ideal R} {N N₁ N₂ P P₁ P₂ : submodule R M}
theorem mem_annihilator {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0:M) :=
⟨λ hr n hn, congr_arg subtype.val (linear_map.ext_iff.1 (linear_map.mem_ker.1 hr) ⟨n, hn⟩),
λ h, linear_map.mem_ker.2 $ linear_map.ext $ λ n, subtype.eq $ h n.1 n.2⟩
theorem mem_annihilator' {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ N ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) ⊥ :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).2 $ H n hn, λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).1 $ H hn⟩
theorem annihilator_bot : (⊥ : submodule R M).annihilator = ⊤ :=
(ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ mem_annihilator'.2 bot_le
theorem annihilator_eq_top_iff : N.annihilator = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊥ :=
⟨λ H, eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ (n:M) hn, (mem_bot R).2 $
one_smul R n ▸ mem_annihilator.1 ((ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).1 H) n hn,
λ H, H.symm ▸ annihilator_bot⟩
theorem annihilator_mono (h : N ≤ P) : P.annihilator ≤ N.annihilator :=
λ r hrp, mem_annihilator.2 $ λ n hn, mem_annihilator.1 hrp n $ h hn
theorem annihilator_supr (ι : Sort w) (f : ι → submodule R M) :
(annihilator ⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, annihilator (f i) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, annihilator_mono $ le_supr _ _)
(λ r H, mem_annihilator'.2 $ supr_le $ λ i,
have _ := (mem_infi _).1 H i, mem_annihilator'.1 this)
theorem mem_colon {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ ∀ p ∈ P, r • p ∈ N :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H p hp, (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).1 (H (quotient.mk p) (mem_map_of_mem hp)),
λ H m ⟨p, hp, hpm⟩, hpm ▸ (N.mkq).map_smul r p ▸ (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).2 $ H p hp⟩
theorem mem_colon' {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ P ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) N :=
mem_colon
theorem colon_mono (hn : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hp : P₁ ≤ P₂) : N₁.colon P₂ ≤ N₂.colon P₁ :=
λ r hrnp, mem_colon.2 $ λ p₁ hp₁, hn $ mem_colon.1 hrnp p₁ $ hp hp₁
theorem infi_colon_supr (ι₁ : Sort w) (f : ι₁ → submodule R M)
(ι₂ : Sort x) (g : ι₂ → submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, f i).colon (⨆ j, g j) = ⨅ i j, (f i).colon (g j) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ λ j, colon_mono (infi_le _ _) (le_supr _ _))
(λ r H, mem_colon'.2 $ supr_le $ λ j, map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ le_infi $ λ i,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mem_colon'.1 $ have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 H i),
have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 this j), this)
theorem smul_mem_smul {r} {n} (hr : r ∈ I) (hn : n ∈ N) : r • n ∈ I • N :=
(le_supr _ ⟨r, hr⟩ : _ ≤ I • N) ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
theorem smul_le {P : submodule R M} : I • N ≤ P ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), r • n ∈ P :=
⟨λ H r hr n hn, H $ smul_mem_smul hr hn,
λ H, supr_le $ λ r, map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ n hn, H r.1 r.2 n hn⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem smul_induction_on {p : M → Prop} {x} (H : x ∈ I • N)
(Hb : ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), p (r • n)) (H0 : p 0)
(H1 : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(H2 : ∀ (c:R) n, p n → p (c • n)) : p x :=
(@smul_le _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨p, H0, H1, H2⟩).2 Hb H
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨λ hx, smul_induction_on hx
(λ r hri n hnm,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm in ⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
⟨0, I.zero_mem, by rw [zero_smul]⟩
(λ m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩,
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩)
(λ c r ⟨y, hyi, hy⟩, ⟨c * y, I.mul_mem_left _ hyi, by rw [mul_smul, hy]⟩),
λ ⟨y, hyi, hy⟩, hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span $ set.mem_singleton m)⟩
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n, N.smul_mem r
theorem smul_mono (hij : I ≤ J) (hnp : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ J • P :=
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, smul_mem_smul (hij hr) (hnp hn)
theorem smul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I • N ≤ J • N :=
smul_mono h (le_refl N)
theorem smul_mono_right (h : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ I • P :=
smul_mono (le_refl I) h
variables (I J N P)
@[simp] theorem smul_bot : I • (⊥ : submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsb,
(submodule.mem_bot R).2 $ ((submodule.mem_bot R).1 hsb).symm ▸ smul_zero r
@[simp] theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : ideal R) • N = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hrb s hsi,
(submodule.mem_bot R).2 $ ((submodule.mem_bot R).1 hrb).symm ▸ zero_smul _ s
@[simp] theorem top_smul : (⊤ : ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right $ λ r hri, one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
theorem smul_sup : I • (N ⊔ P) = I • N ⊔ I • P :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hri m hmnp, let ⟨n, hn, p, hp, hnpm⟩ := mem_sup.1 hmnp in
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, smul_mem_smul hri hn, _, smul_mem_smul hri hp, hnpm ▸ (smul_add _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (smul_mono_right le_sup_left)
(smul_mono_right le_sup_right))
theorem sup_smul : (I ⊔ J) • N = I • N ⊔ J • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hrij n hn, let ⟨ri, hri, rj, hrj, hrijr⟩ := mem_sup.1 hrij in
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, smul_mem_smul hri hn, _, smul_mem_smul hrj hn, hrijr ▸ (add_smul _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (smul_mono_left le_sup_left)
(smul_mono_left le_sup_right))
protected theorem smul_assoc : (I • J) • N = I • (J • N) :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ rs hrsij t htn,
smul_induction_on hrsij
(λ r hr s hs,
(@smul_eq_mul R _ r s).symm ▸ smul_smul r s t ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (smul_mem_smul hs htn))
((zero_smul R t).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ x y, (add_smul x y t).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ r s h, (@smul_eq_mul R _ r s).symm ▸ smul_smul r s t ▸ submodule.smul_mem _ _ h))
(smul_le.2 $ λ r hr sn hsn, suffices J • N ≤ submodule.comap (r • linear_map.id) ((I • J) • N),
from this hsn,
smul_le.2 $ λ s hs n hn, show r • (s • n) ∈ (I • J) • N,
from mul_smul r s n ▸ smul_mem_smul (smul_mem_smul hr hs) hn)
variables (S : set R) (T : set M)
theorem span_smul_span : (ideal.span S) • (span R T) =
span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hrS n hnT, span_induction hrS
(λ r hrS, span_induction hnT
(λ n hnT, subset_span $ set.mem_bUnion hrS $
set.mem_bUnion hnT $ set.mem_singleton _)
((smul_zero r : r • 0 = (0:M)).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ x y, (smul_add r x y).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ c m, by rw [smul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul]; exact submodule.smul_mem _ _))
((zero_smul R n).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ r s, (add_smul r s n).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ c r, by rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_smul]; exact submodule.smul_mem _ _)) $
span_le.2 $ set.bUnion_subset $ λ r hrS, set.bUnion_subset $ λ n hnT, set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $
smul_mem_smul (subset_span hrS) (subset_span hnT)
variables {M' : Type w} [add_comm_group M'] [module R M']
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f,
from (f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) $
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn in
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
end submodule
namespace ideal
section chinese_remainder
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {ι : Type v}
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_mem (s : finset ι) {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) (i : ι) (his : i ∈ s) :
∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ f i ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → r ∈ f j :=
begin
have : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → ∃ r : R, ∃ H : r - 1 ∈ f i, r ∈ f j,
{ intros j hjs hji, specialize hf i his j hjs hji.symm,
rw [eq_top_iff_one, submodule.mem_sup] at hf,
rcases hf with ⟨r, hri, s, hsj, hrs⟩, refine ⟨1 - r, _, _⟩,
{ rw [sub_right_comm, sub_self, zero_sub], exact (f i).neg_mem hri },
{ rw [← hrs, add_sub_cancel'], exact hsj } },
classical,
have : ∃ g : ι → R, (∀ j, g j - 1 ∈ f i) ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → g j ∈ f j,
{ choose g hg1 hg2,
refine ⟨λ j, if H : j ∈ s ∧ j ≠ i then g j H.1 H.2 else 1, λ j, _, λ j, _⟩,
{ split_ifs with h, { apply hg1 }, rw sub_self, exact (f i).zero_mem },
{ intros hjs hji, rw dif_pos, { apply hg2 }, exact ⟨hjs, hji⟩ } },
rcases this with ⟨g, hgi, hgj⟩, use (∏ x in s.erase i, g x), split,
{ rw [← quotient.eq, ring_hom.map_one, ring_hom.map_prod],
apply finset.prod_eq_one, intros, rw [← ring_hom.map_one, quotient.eq], apply hgi },
intros j hjs hji, rw [← quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ring_hom.map_prod],
refine finset.prod_eq_zero (finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hji hjs) _,
rw quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, exact hgj j hjs hji
end
theorem exists_sub_mem [fintype ι] {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) (g : ι → R) :
∃ r : R, ∀ i, r - g i ∈ f i :=
begin
have : ∃ φ : ι → R, (∀ i, φ i - 1 ∈ f i) ∧ (∀ i j, i ≠ j → φ i ∈ f j),
{ have := exists_sub_one_mem_and_mem (finset.univ : finset ι) (λ i _ j _ hij, hf i j hij),
choose φ hφ,
existsi λ i, φ i (finset.mem_univ i),
exact ⟨λ i, (hφ i _).1, λ i j hij, (hφ i _).2 j (finset.mem_univ j) hij.symm⟩ },
rcases this with ⟨φ, hφ1, hφ2⟩,
use ∑ i, g i * φ i,
intros i,
rw [← quotient.eq, ring_hom.map_sum],
refine eq.trans (finset.sum_eq_single i _ _) _,
{ intros j _ hji, rw quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, exact (f i).mul_mem_left _ (hφ2 j i hji) },
{ intros hi, exact (hi $ finset.mem_univ i).elim },
specialize hφ1 i, rw [← quotient.eq, ring_hom.map_one] at hφ1,
rw [ring_hom.map_mul, hφ1, mul_one]
end
/-- The homomorphism from `R/(⋂ i, f i)` to `∏ i, (R / f i)` featured in the Chinese
Remainder Theorem. It is bijective if the ideals `f i` are comaximal. -/
def quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient (f : ι → ideal R) :
(⨅ i, f i).quotient →+* Π i, (f i).quotient :=
quotient.lift (⨅ i, f i)
(pi.ring_hom (λ i : ι, (quotient.mk (f i) : _))) $
λ r hr, begin
rw submodule.mem_infi at hr,
ext i,
exact quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 (hr i)
end
theorem quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient_bijective [fintype ι] {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) :
function.bijective (quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f) :=
⟨λ x y, quotient.induction_on₂' x y $ λ r s hrs, quotient.eq.2 $
(submodule.mem_infi _).2 $ λ i, quotient.eq.1 $
show quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f (quotient.mk' r) i = _, by rw hrs; refl,
λ g, let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_sub_mem hf (λ i, quotient.out' (g i)) in
⟨quotient.mk _ r, funext $ λ i, quotient.out_eq' (g i) ▸ quotient.eq.2 (hr i)⟩⟩
/-- Chinese Remainder Theorem. Eisenbud Ex.2.6. Similar to Atiyah-Macdonald 1.10 and Stacks 00DT -/
noncomputable def quotient_inf_ring_equiv_pi_quotient [fintype ι] (f : ι → ideal R)
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) :
(⨅ i, f i).quotient ≃+* Π i, (f i).quotient :=
{ .. equiv.of_bijective _ (quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient_bijective hf),
.. quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f }
end chinese_remainder
section mul_and_radical
variables {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {I J K L: ideal R}
instance : has_mul (ideal R) := ⟨(•)⟩
@[simp] lemma add_eq_sup : I + J = I ⊔ J := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_bot : (0 : ideal R) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_eq_top : (1 : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
by erw [submodule.one_eq_map_top, submodule.map_id]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (s ∈ J), r * s ∈ K :=
submodule.smul_le
lemma mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
ideal.mul_le.2 (λ r hr s, J.mul_mem_left _)
lemma mul_le_right : I * J ≤ I :=
ideal.mul_le.2 (λ r hr s hs, I.mul_mem_right _ hr)
@[simp] lemma sup_mul_right_self : I ⊔ (I * J) = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 ideal.mul_le_right
@[simp] lemma sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ (J * I) = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 ideal.mul_le_left
@[simp] lemma mul_right_self_sup : (I * J) ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 ideal.mul_le_right
@[simp] lemma mul_left_self_sup : (J * I) ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 ideal.mul_le_left
variables (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 $ λ r hrI s hsJ, mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 $ λ r hrJ s hsI, mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
protected theorem mul_assoc : (I * J) * K = I * (J * K) :=
submodule.smul_assoc I J K
theorem span_mul_span (S T : set R) : span S * span T =
span ⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t} :=
submodule.span_smul_span S T
variables {I J K}
lemma span_mul_span' (S T : set R) : span S * span T = span (S*T) :=
by { unfold span, rw submodule.span_mul_span, }
lemma span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : ideal R) :=
by { unfold span, rw [submodule.span_mul_span, set.singleton_mul_singleton], }
lemma span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ):
span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : ideal R) :=
begin
induction n with n ih, { simp [set.singleton_one] },
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton],
end
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj, ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem prod_le_inf {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
begin
classical, refine s.induction_on _ _,
{ rw [finset.prod_empty, finset.inf_empty], exact le_top },
intros a s has ih,
rw [finset.prod_insert has, finset.inf_insert],
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf (le_refl _) ih)
end
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf $ λ r ⟨hri, hrj⟩,
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h) in
mul_one r ▸ hst ▸ (mul_add r s t).symm ▸ ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj)
(mul_mem_mul hri htj)
variables (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
submodule.smul_bot I
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ :=
submodule.bot_smul I
theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ submodule.top_smul I
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
submodule.top_smul I
variables {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_right h
variables (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
submodule.sup_smul I J K
variables {I J K}
lemma pow_le_pow {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
I^n ≤ I^m :=
begin
cases nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with k hk,
rw [hk, pow_add],
exact le_trans (mul_le_inf) (inf_le_left)
end
lemma mul_eq_bot {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] {I J : ideal R} :
I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨λ hij, or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr (λ I_ne_bot, J.eq_bot_iff.mpr (λ j hj,
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot in
or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0)),
λ h, by cases h; rw [← ideal.mul_bot, h, ideal.mul_comm]⟩
instance {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] : no_zero_divisors (ideal R) :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ I J, mul_eq_bot.1 }
/-- A product of ideals in an integral domain is zero if and only if one of the terms is zero. -/
lemma prod_eq_bot {R : Type*} [integral_domain R]
{s : multiset (ideal R)} : s.prod = ⊥ ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I = ⊥ :=
prod_zero_iff_exists_zero
/-- The radical of an ideal `I` consists of the elements `r` such that `r^n ∈ I` for some `n`. -/
def radical (I : ideal R) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := { r | ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I },
zero_mem' := ⟨1, (pow_one (0:R)).symm ▸ I.zero_mem⟩,
add_mem' := λ x y ⟨m, hxmi⟩ ⟨n, hyni⟩, ⟨m + n,
(add_pow x y (m + n)).symm ▸ I.sum_mem $
show ∀ c ∈ finset.range (nat.succ (m + n)),
x ^ c * y ^ (m + n - c) * (nat.choose (m + n) c) ∈ I,
from λ c hc, or.cases_on (le_total c m)
(λ hcm, I.mul_mem_right _ $ I.mul_mem_left _ $ nat.add_comm n m ▸
(nat.add_sub_assoc hcm n).symm ▸
(pow_add y n (m-c)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hyni)
(λ hmc, I.mul_mem_right _ $ I.mul_mem_right _ $ nat.add_sub_cancel' hmc ▸
(pow_add x m (c-m)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hxmi)⟩,
smul_mem' := λ r s ⟨n, hsni⟩, ⟨n, (mul_pow r s n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_left (r^n) hsni⟩ }
theorem le_radical : I ≤ radical I :=
λ r hri, ⟨1, (pow_one r).symm ▸ hri⟩
variables (R)
theorem radical_top : (radical ⊤ : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 ⟨0, submodule.mem_top⟩
variables {R}
theorem radical_mono (H : I ≤ J) : radical I ≤ radical J :=
λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, H hrni⟩
variables (I)
@[simp] theorem radical_idem : radical (radical I) = radical I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, k, hrnki⟩, ⟨n * k, (pow_mul r n k).symm ▸ hrnki⟩) le_radical
variables {I}
theorem radical_le_radical_iff : radical I ≤ radical J ↔ I ≤ radical J :=
⟨λ h, le_trans le_radical h, λ h, radical_idem J ▸ radical_mono h⟩
theorem radical_eq_top : radical I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨λ h, (eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (eq_top_iff_one _).1 h in
@one_pow R _ n ▸ hn, λ h, h.symm ▸ radical_top R⟩
theorem is_prime.radical (H : is_prime I) : radical I = I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, H.mem_of_pow_mem n hrni) le_radical
variables (I J)
theorem radical_sup : radical (I ⊔ J) = radical (radical I ⊔ radical J) :=
le_antisymm (radical_mono $ sup_le_sup le_radical le_radical) $
λ r ⟨n, hrnij⟩, let ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrnij in
@radical_idem _ _ (I ⊔ J) ▸ ⟨n, hst ▸ ideal.add_mem _
(radical_mono le_sup_left hs) (radical_mono le_sup_right ht)⟩
theorem radical_inf : radical (I ⊓ J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (radical_mono inf_le_left) (radical_mono inf_le_right))
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hrm,
(pow_add r m n).symm ▸ J.mul_mem_left _ hrn⟩)
theorem radical_mul : radical (I * J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (radical_inf I J ▸ radical_mono $ @mul_le_inf _ _ I J)
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ mul_mem_mul hrm hrn⟩)
variables {I J}
theorem is_prime.radical_le_iff (hj : is_prime J) :
radical I ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨le_trans le_radical, λ hij r ⟨n, hrni⟩, hj.mem_of_pow_mem n $ hij hrni⟩
theorem radical_eq_Inf (I : ideal R) :
radical I = Inf { J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J } :=
le_antisymm (le_Inf $ λ J hJ, hJ.2.radical_le_iff.2 hJ.1) $
λ r hr, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hri,
let ⟨m, (hrm : r ∉ radical m), him, hm⟩ := zorn.zorn_nonempty_partial_order₀
{K : ideal R | r ∉ radical K}
(λ c hc hcc y hyc, ⟨Sup c, λ ⟨n, hrnc⟩, let ⟨y, hyc, hrny⟩ :=
(submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed ⟨y, hyc⟩ hcc.directed_on).1 hrnc in hc hyc ⟨n, hrny⟩,
λ z, le_Sup⟩) I hri in
have ∀ x ∉ m, r ∈ radical (m ⊔ span {x}) := λ x hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hrmx, hxm $
hm (m ⊔ span {x}) hrmx le_sup_left ▸ (le_sup_right : _ ≤ m ⊔ span {x})
(subset_span $ set.mem_singleton _),
have is_prime m, from ⟨by rintro rfl; rw radical_top at hrm; exact hrm trivial,
λ x y hxym, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hym,
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := this _ hxm,
⟨p, hpm, q, hq, hpqrn⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrn,
⟨c, hcxq⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq in
let ⟨k, hrk⟩ := this _ hym,
⟨f, hfm, g, hg, hfgrk⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrk,
⟨d, hdyg⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hg in
hrm ⟨n + k, by rw [pow_add, ← hpqrn, ← hcxq, ← hfgrk, ← hdyg, add_mul, mul_add (c*x),
mul_assoc c x (d*y), mul_left_comm x, ← mul_assoc];
refine m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_right _ hpm) (m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_left _ hfm)
(m.mul_mem_left _ hxym))⟩⟩,
hrm $ this.radical.symm ▸ (Inf_le ⟨him, this⟩ : Inf {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J} ≤ m) hr
@[simp] lemma radical_bot_of_integral_domain {R : Type u} [integral_domain R] :
radical (⊥ : ideal R) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 (λ x hx, hx.rec_on (λ n hn, pow_eq_zero hn))
instance : comm_semiring (ideal R) := submodule.comm_semiring
variables (R)
theorem top_pow (n : ℕ) : (⊤ ^ n : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
nat.rec_on n one_eq_top $ λ n ih, by rw [pow_succ, ih, top_mul]
variables {R}
variables (I)
theorem radical_pow (n : ℕ) (H : n > 0) : radical (I^n) = radical I :=
nat.rec_on n (not.elim dec_trivial) (λ n ih H,
or.cases_on (lt_or_eq_of_le $ nat.le_of_lt_succ H)
(λ H, calc radical (I^(n+1))
= radical I ⊓ radical (I^n) : by { rw pow_succ, exact radical_mul _ _ }
... = radical I ⊓ radical I : by rw ih H
... = radical I : inf_idem)
(λ H, H ▸ (pow_one I).symm ▸ rfl)) H
theorem is_prime.mul_le {I J P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P) :
I * J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hip j hj, let ⟨i, hi, hip⟩ := set.not_subset.1 hip in
(hp.mem_or_mem $ h $ mul_mem_mul hi hj).resolve_left hip,
λ h, or.cases_on h (le_trans $ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_left)
(le_trans $ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_right)⟩
theorem is_prime.inf_le {I J P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P) :
I ⊓ J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, hp.mul_le.1 $ le_trans mul_le_inf h,
λ h, or.cases_on h (le_trans inf_le_left) (le_trans inf_le_right)⟩
theorem is_prime.prod_le {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {P : ideal R}
(hp : is_prime P) (hne: s.nonempty) :
s.prod f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
suffices s.prod f ≤ P → ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P,
from ⟨this, λ ⟨i, his, hip⟩, le_trans prod_le_inf $ le_trans (finset.inf_le his) hip⟩,
begin
classical,
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b, b ∈ s := hne.bex,
obtain ⟨t, hbt, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, b ∉ t ∧ s = insert b t,
from ⟨s.erase b, s.not_mem_erase b, (finset.insert_erase hb).symm⟩,
revert hbt,
refine t.induction_on _ _,
{ simp only [finset.not_mem_empty, insert_emptyc_eq, exists_prop, finset.prod_singleton,
imp_self, exists_eq_left, not_false_iff, finset.mem_singleton] },
intros a s has ih hbs h,
have : a ∉ insert b s,
{ contrapose! has,
apply finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne has,
rintro rfl,
contradiction },
rw [finset.insert.comm, finset.prod_insert this, hp.mul_le] at h,
rw finset.insert.comm,
cases h,
{ exact ⟨a, finset.mem_insert_self a _, h⟩ },
obtain ⟨i, hi, ih⟩ : ∃ i ∈ insert b s, f i ≤ P := ih (mt finset.mem_insert_of_mem hbs) h,
exact ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi, ih⟩
end
theorem is_prime.inf_le' {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P)
(hsne: s.nonempty) :
s.inf f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, (hp.prod_le hsne).1 $ le_trans prod_le_inf h,
λ ⟨i, his, hip⟩, le_trans (finset.inf_le his) hip⟩
theorem subset_union {I J K : ideal R} : (I : set R) ⊆ J ∪ K ↔ I ≤ J ∨ I ≤ K :=
⟨λ h, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hij s hsi,
let ⟨r, hri, hrj⟩ := set.not_subset.1 hij in classical.by_contradiction $ λ hsk,
or.cases_on (h $ I.add_mem hri hsi)
(λ hj, hrj $ add_sub_cancel r s ▸ J.sub_mem hj ((h hsi).resolve_right hsk))
(λ hk, hsk $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ K.sub_mem hk ((h hri).resolve_left hrj)),
λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset_union_left J K)
(λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset_union_right J K)⟩
theorem subset_union_prime' {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {a b : ι}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, is_prime (f i)) {I : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) ↔ I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) →
I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i,
from ⟨this, λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset.trans
(set.subset_union_left _ _) (set.subset_union_left _ _)) $
λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset.trans
(set.subset_union_right _ _) (set.subset_union_left _ _)) $
λ ⟨i, his, hi⟩, by refine (set.subset.trans hi $ set.subset.trans _ $
set.subset_union_right _ _);
exact set.subset_bUnion_of_mem (finset.mem_coe.2 his)⟩,
begin
generalize hn : s.card = n, intros h,
unfreezingI { induction n with n ih generalizing a b s },
{ clear hp,
rw finset.card_eq_zero at hn, subst hn,
rw [finset.coe_empty, set.bUnion_empty, set.union_empty, subset_union] at h,
simpa only [exists_prop, finset.not_mem_empty, false_and, exists_false, or_false] },
classical,
replace hn : ∃ (i : ι) (t : finset ι), i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s ∧ t.card = n :=
finset.card_eq_succ.1 hn,
unfreezingI { rcases hn with ⟨i, t, hit, rfl, hn⟩ },
replace hp : is_prime (f i) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, is_prime (f x) := (t.forall_mem_insert _ _).1 hp,
by_cases Ht : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i,
{ obtain ⟨j, hjt, hfji⟩ : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i := Ht,
obtain ⟨u, hju, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, j ∉ u ∧ insert j u = t,
{ exact ⟨t.erase j, t.not_mem_erase j, finset.insert_erase hjt⟩ },
have hp' : ∀ k ∈ insert i u, is_prime (f k),
{ rw finset.forall_mem_insert at hp ⊢, exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.2⟩ },
have hiu : i ∉ u := mt finset.mem_insert_of_mem hit,
have hn' : (insert i u).card = n,
{ rwa finset.card_insert_of_not_mem at hn ⊢, exacts [hiu, hju] },
have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ k ∈ (↑(insert i u) : set ι), f k),
{ rw finset.coe_insert at h ⊢, rw finset.coe_insert at h,
simp only [set.bUnion_insert] at h ⊢,
rw [← set.union_assoc ↑(f i)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right hfji] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih a b (insert i u) hp' hn' h',
refine ih.imp id (or.imp id (exists_imp_exists $ λ k, _)), simp only [exists_prop],
exact and.imp (λ hk, finset.insert_subset_insert i (finset.subset_insert j u) hk) id },
by_cases Ha : f a ≤ f i,
{ have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f i ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j),
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_assoc,
set.union_right_comm ↑(f a)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Ha] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih i b t hp.2 hn h', right,
rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩ },
{ exact or.inl ih },
{ exact or.inr ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩ } },
by_cases Hb : f b ≤ f i,
{ have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f i ∪ (⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j),
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_assoc, set.union_assoc ↑(f a)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Hb] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih a i t hp.2 hn h',
rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ exact or.inl ih },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩) } },
by_cases Hi : I ≤ f i,
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, Hi⟩) },
have : ¬I ⊓ f a ⊓ f b ⊓ t.inf f ≤ f i,
{ rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hsne),
{ rw [finset.inf_empty, inf_top_eq, hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le, not_or_distrib, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩ },
simp only [hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le' hsne, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩, Ht⟩ },
rcases set.not_subset.1 this with ⟨r, ⟨⟨⟨hrI, hra⟩, hrb⟩, hr⟩, hri⟩,
by_cases HI : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j,
{ specialize ih hp.2 hn HI, rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ left, exact ih }, { right, left, exact ih },
{ right, right, exact ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩ } },
exfalso, rcases set.not_subset.1 HI with ⟨s, hsI, hs⟩,
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert] at h,
have hsi : s ∈ f i := ((h hsI).resolve_left (mt or.inl hs)).resolve_right (mt or.inr hs),
rcases h (I.add_mem hrI hsI) with ⟨ha | hb⟩ | hi | ht,
{ exact hs (or.inl $ or.inl $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f a).sub_mem ha hra) },
{ exact hs (or.inl $ or.inr $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f b).sub_mem hb hrb) },
{ exact hri (add_sub_cancel r s ▸ (f i).sub_mem hi hsi) },
{ rw set.mem_bUnion_iff at ht, rcases ht with ⟨j, hjt, hj⟩,
simp only [finset.inf_eq_infi, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_infi] at hr,
exact hs (or.inr $ set.mem_bUnion hjt $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f j).sub_mem hj $ hr j hjt) }
end
/-- Prime avoidance. Atiyah-Macdonald 1.11, Eisenbud 3.3, Stacks 00DS, Matsumura Ex.1.6. -/
theorem subset_union_prime {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} (a b : ι)
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ a → i ≠ b → is_prime (f i)) {I : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices (I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) → ∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ I ≤ f i,
from ⟨λ h, bex_def.2 $ this h, λ ⟨i, his, hi⟩, set.subset.trans hi $ set.subset_bUnion_of_mem $
show i ∈ (↑s : set ι), from his⟩,
assume h : (I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i),
begin
classical, tactic.unfreeze_local_instances,
by_cases has : a ∈ s,
{ obtain ⟨t, hat, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s :=
⟨s.erase a, finset.not_mem_erase a s, finset.insert_erase has⟩,
by_cases hbt : b ∈ t,
{ obtain ⟨u, hbu, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, b ∉ u ∧ insert b u = t :=
⟨t.erase b, finset.not_mem_erase b t, finset.insert_erase hbt⟩,
have hp' : ∀ i ∈ u, is_prime (f i),
{ intros i hiu, refine hp i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hiu)) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, set.bUnion_insert,
← set.union_assoc, subset_union_prime' hp', bex_def] at h,
rwa [finset.exists_mem_insert, finset.exists_mem_insert] },
{ have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f a : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert } },
{ by_cases hbs : b ∈ s,
{ obtain ⟨t, hbt, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, b ∉ t ∧ insert b t = s :=
⟨s.erase b, finset.not_mem_erase b s, finset.insert_erase hbs⟩,
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f b : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert },
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hse hsne,
{ subst hse, rw [finset.coe_empty, set.bUnion_empty, set.subset_empty_iff] at h,
have : (I : set R) ≠ ∅ := set.nonempty.ne_empty (set.nonempty_of_mem I.zero_mem),
exact absurd h this },
{ cases hsne.bex with i his,
obtain ⟨t, hit, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s :=
⟨s.erase i, finset.not_mem_erase i s, finset.insert_erase his⟩,
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f i : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert } }
end
end mul_and_radical
section map_and_comap
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
variables (f : R →+* S)
variables {I J : ideal R} {K L : ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : ideal R) : ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap (I : ideal S) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := f ⁻¹' I,
smul_mem' := λ c x hx, show f (c * x) ∈ I, by { rw f.map_mul, exact I.mul_mem_left _ hx },
.. I.to_add_submonoid.comap (f : R →+ S) }
variables {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono $ set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : R →+* S) {I : ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
lemma apply_coe_mem_map (f : R →+* S) (I : ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap :
map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans set.image_subset_iff
@[simp] theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K := iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
set.preimage_mono (λ x hx, h hx)
variables (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 $ by rw [mem_comap, f.map_one];
exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
instance is_prime.comap [hK : K.is_prime] : (comap f K).is_prime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, λ x y,
by simp only [mem_comap, f.map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variables (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ subset_span ⟨1, trivial, f.map_one⟩
theorem map_mul : map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj,
show f (r * s) ∈ _, by rw f.map_mul;
exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(trans_rel_right _ (span_mul_span _ _) $ span_le.2 $
set.bUnion_subset $ λ i ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩,
set.bUnion_subset $ λ j ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩,
set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ hfri ▸ hfsj ▸
by rw [← f.map_mul];
exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj))
variable (f)
lemma gc_map_comap : galois_connection (ideal.map f) (ideal.comap f) :=
λ I J, ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp] lemma comap_id : I.comap (ring_hom.id R) = I :=
ideal.ext $ λ _, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_id : I.map (ring_hom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (ring_hom.id R)).l_unique galois_connection.id comap_id
lemma comap_comap {T : Type*} [comm_ring T] {I : ideal T} (f : R →+* S)
(g : S →+*T) : (I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) := rfl
lemma map_map {T : Type*} [comm_ring T] {I : ideal R} (f : R →+* S)
(g : S →+*T) : (I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose _ _ _ _ (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique
(gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) (λ _, comap_comap _ _)
variables {f I J K L}
lemma map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
lemma le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
lemma le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
lemma map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp] lemma comap_top : (⊤ : ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp] lemma comap_eq_top_iff {I : ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨ λ h, I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (f.map_one ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
λ h, by rw [h, comap_top] ⟩
@[simp] lemma map_bot : (⊥ : ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
variables (f I J K L)
@[simp] lemma map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
congr_fun (gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp] lemma comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
congr_fun (gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
lemma map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L := rfl
variables {ι : Sort*}
lemma map_supr (K : ι → ideal R) : (supr K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_supr
lemma comap_infi (K : ι → ideal S) : (infi K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_infi
lemma map_Sup (s : set (ideal R)): (Sup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_Sup
lemma comap_Inf (s : set (ideal S)): (Inf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_Inf
lemma comap_Inf' (s : set (ideal S)) : (Inf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ (comap f '' s), I :=
trans (comap_Inf f s) (by rw infi_image)
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, show f (r ^ n) ∈ K,
from (f.map_pow r n).symm ▸ hfrnk⟩)
(λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, f.map_pow r n ▸ hfrnk⟩)
theorem comap_is_prime [H : is_prime K] : is_prime (comap f K) :=
⟨comap_ne_top f H.ne_top,
λ x y h, H.mem_or_mem $ by rwa [mem_comap, ring_hom.map_mul] at h⟩
@[simp] lemma map_quotient_self :
map (quotient.mk I) I = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ x hx,
(submodule.mem_bot I.quotient).2 $ ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 hx
variables {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, f.map_pow r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ (map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _)
section surjective
variables (hf : function.surjective f)
include hf
open function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : ideal S) :
map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (le_refl _))
(λ s hsi, let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s in
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f $ show f r ∈ I, from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi))
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def gi_map_comap : galois_insertion (map f) (comap f) :=
galois_insertion.monotone_intro
((gc_map_comap f).monotone_u)
((gc_map_comap f).monotone_l)
(λ _, le_comap_map)
(map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
lemma map_surjective_of_surjective : surjective (map f) :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_surjective
lemma comap_injective_of_surjective : injective (comap f) :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).u_injective
lemma map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
lemma map_supr_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → ideal S) : (⨆i, (K i).comap f).map f = supr K :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_supr_u _
lemma map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
lemma map_infi_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → ideal S) : (⨅i, (K i).comap f).map f = infi K :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_infi_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : ideal R} {y}
(H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
submodule.span_induction H (λ _, id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, f.map_zero⟩
(λ y1 y2 ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩,
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ f.map_add _ _⟩)
(λ c y ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩, let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c in ⟨d • x, I.smul_mem _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ f.map_mul _ _⟩)
lemma mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : ideal R} {y} :
y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨λ h, (set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h),
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, hx.right ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f hx.left)⟩
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (I : ideal R) :
comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (assume r h, let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h in
submodule.mem_sup.2 ⟨s, hsi, r - s, (submodule.mem_bot S).2 $ by rw [f.map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel'_right s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 (le_refl _)) (comap_mono bot_le))
lemma le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I :=
λ h, (map_comap_of_surjective f hf K) ▸ map_mono h
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def rel_iso_of_surjective :
ideal S ≃o { p : ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } :=
{ to_fun := λ J, ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩,
inv_fun := λ I, map f I.1,
left_inv := λ J, map_comap_of_surjective f hf J,
right_inv := λ I, subtype.eq $ show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1,
from (comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm
(sup_le (le_refl _) I.2) le_sup_left,
map_rel_iff' := λ I1 I2, ⟨λ H, map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸
map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H, comap_mono⟩ }
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def order_embedding_of_surjective : ideal S ↪o ideal R :=
(rel_iso_of_surjective f hf).to_rel_embedding.trans (subtype.rel_embedding _ _)
theorem map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective (H : is_maximal I) :
(map f I) = ⊤ ∨ is_maximal (map f I) :=
begin
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (λ ne_top, ⟨⟨λ h, ne_top h, λ J hJ, _⟩⟩),
{ refine (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf).injective
(subtype.ext_iff.2 (eq.trans (H.1.2 (comap f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne _ _)) comap_top.symm)),
{ exact (map_le_iff_le_comap).1 (le_of_lt hJ) },
{ exact λ h, hJ.right (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf (le_of_eq h.symm)) } }
end
theorem comap_is_maximal_of_surjective [H : is_maximal K] : is_maximal (comap f K) :=
begin
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, λ J hJ, _⟩⟩,
suffices : map f J = ⊤,
{ replace this := congr_arg (comap f) this,
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this,
rw eq_top_iff,
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono (bot_le)) (le_of_lt hJ))) },
refine H.1.2 (map f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ))
(λ h, ne_of_lt hJ (trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) _))),
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left],
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end
end surjective
lemma mem_quotient_iff_mem (hIJ : I ≤ J) {x : R} :
quotient.mk I x ∈ J.map (quotient.mk I) ↔ x ∈ J :=
begin
refine iff.trans (mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ quotient.mk_surjective) _,
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, x_mem, x_eq⟩,
simpa using J.add_mem (hIJ (quotient.eq.mp x_eq.symm)) x_mem },
{ intro x_mem,
exact ⟨x, x_mem, rfl⟩ }
end
section injective
variables (hf : function.injective f)
include hf
open function
lemma comap_bot_le_of_injective : comap f ⊥ ≤ I :=
begin
refine le_trans (λ x hx, _) bot_le,
rw [mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot, ← ring_hom.map_zero f] at hx,
exact eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ (submodule.zero_mem ⊥)
end
end injective
section bijective
variables (hf : function.bijective f)
include hf
open function
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def rel_iso_of_bijective : ideal S ≃o ideal R :=
{ to_fun := comap f,
inv_fun := map f,
left_inv := (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).left_inv,
right_inv := λ J, subtype.ext_iff.1
((rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).right_inv ⟨J, comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf.left⟩),
map_rel_iff' := (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).map_rel_iff' }
lemma comap_le_iff_le_map : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨λ h, le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h,
λ h, ((rel_iso_of_bijective f hf).right_inv I) ▸ comap_mono h⟩
theorem map.is_maximal (H : is_maximal I) : is_maximal (map f I) :=
by refine or_iff_not_imp_left.1
(map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective f hf.right H) (λ h, H.1.1 _);
calc I = comap f (map f I) : ((rel_iso_of_bijective f hf).right_inv I).symm
... = comap f ⊤ : by rw h
... = ⊤ : by rw comap_top
end bijective
lemma ring_equiv.bot_maximal_iff (e : R ≃+* S) :
(⊥ : ideal R).is_maximal ↔ (⊥ : ideal S).is_maximal :=
⟨λ h, (@map_bot _ _ _ _ e.to_ring_hom) ▸ map.is_maximal e.to_ring_hom e.bijective h,
λ h, (@map_bot _ _ _ _ e.symm.to_ring_hom) ▸ map.is_maximal e.symm.to_ring_hom e.symm.bijective h⟩
end map_and_comap
section is_primary
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
/-- A proper ideal `I` is primary iff `xy ∈ I` implies `x ∈ I` or `y ∈ radical I`. -/
def is_primary (I : ideal R) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ {x y : R}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ radical I
theorem is_primary.to_is_prime (I : ideal R) (hi : is_prime I) : is_primary I :=
⟨hi.1, λ x y hxy, (hi.mem_or_mem hxy).imp id $ λ hyi, le_radical hyi⟩
theorem mem_radical_of_pow_mem {I : ideal R} {x : R} {m : ℕ} (hx : x ^ m ∈ radical I) :
x ∈ radical I :=
radical_idem I ▸ ⟨m, hx⟩
theorem is_prime_radical {I : ideal R} (hi : is_primary I) : is_prime (radical I) :=
⟨mt radical_eq_top.1 hi.1, λ x y ⟨m, hxy⟩, begin
rw mul_pow at hxy, cases hi.2 hxy,
{ exact or.inl ⟨m, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inr (mem_radical_of_pow_mem h) }
end⟩
theorem is_primary_inf {I J : ideal R} (hi : is_primary I) (hj : is_primary J)
(hij : radical I = radical J) : is_primary (I ⊓ J) :=
⟨ne_of_lt $ lt_of_le_of_lt inf_le_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hi.1), λ x y ⟨hxyi, hxyj⟩,
begin
rw [radical_inf, hij, inf_idem],
cases hi.2 hxyi with hxi hyi, cases hj.2 hxyj with hxj hyj,
{ exact or.inl ⟨hxi, hxj⟩ },
{ exact or.inr hyj },
{ rw hij at hyi, exact or.inr hyi }
end⟩
end is_primary
end ideal
namespace ring_hom
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [comm_ring R]
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : ideal R := ideal.comap f ⊥
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero.-/
lemma mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 :=
by rw [ker, ideal.mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot]
lemma ker_eq : ((ker f) : set R) = is_add_group_hom.ker f := rfl
lemma ker_eq_comap_bot (f : R →+* S) : f.ker = ideal.comap f ⊥ := rfl
lemma injective_iff_ker_eq_bot : function.injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ :=
by rw [set_like.ext'_iff, ker_eq]; exact is_add_group_hom.injective_iff_trivial_ker f
lemma ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 → x = 0 :=
by rw [set_like.ext'_iff, ker_eq]; exact is_add_group_hom.trivial_ker_iff_eq_zero f
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel.-/
lemma not_one_mem_ker [nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) : (1:R) ∉ ker f :=
by { rw [mem_ker, f.map_one], exact one_ne_zero }
@[simp] lemma ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) : ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ :=
by simpa only [←injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] using f.injective
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse`) /
is surjective (`quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective`).
-/
def ker_lift (f : R →+* S) : f.ker.quotient →+* S :=
ideal.quotient.lift _ f $ λ r, f.mem_ker.mp
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_mk (f : R →+* S) (r : R) : ker_lift f (ideal.quotient.mk f.ker r) = f r :=
ideal.quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
lemma ker_lift_injective (f : R →+* S) : function.injective (ker_lift f) :=
assume a b, quotient.induction_on₂' a b $
assume a b (h : f a = f b), quotient.sound' $
show a - b ∈ ker f, by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, h, sub_self]
variable {f}
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for commutative rings, computable version. -/
def quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse
{g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f) :
f.ker.quotient ≃+* S :=
{ to_fun := ker_lift f,
inv_fun := (ideal.quotient.mk f.ker) ∘ g,
left_inv := begin
rintro ⟨x⟩,
apply ker_lift_injective,
simp [hf (f x)],
end,
right_inv := hf,
..ker_lift f}
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply {g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f)
(x : f.ker.quotient) : quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse hf x = ker_lift f x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.symm.apply {g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f)
(x : S) : (quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse hf).symm x = ideal.quotient.mk f.ker (g x) := rfl
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for commutative rings. -/
noncomputable def quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective (hf : function.surjective f) :
f.ker.quotient ≃+* S :=
quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse (classical.some_spec hf.has_right_inverse)
end comm_ring
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to an integral domain is a prime ideal.-/
lemma ker_is_prime [integral_domain S] (f : R →+* S) :
(ker f).is_prime :=
⟨by { rw [ne.def, ideal.eq_top_iff_one], exact not_one_mem_ker f },
λ x y, by simpa only [mem_ker, f.map_mul] using @eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero S _ _ _ _ _⟩
end ring_hom
namespace ideal
variables {R : Type*} {S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
lemma map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker {I : ideal R} (f : R →+* S) : I.map f = ⊥ ↔ I ≤ f.ker :=
by rw [ring_hom.ker, eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap]
@[simp] lemma mk_ker {I : ideal R} : (quotient.mk I).ker = I :=
by ext; rw [ring_hom.ker, mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
lemma ker_le_comap {K : ideal S} (f : R →+* S) : f.ker ≤ comap f K :=
λ x hx, mem_comap.2 (((ring_hom.mem_ker f).1 hx).symm ▸ K.zero_mem)
lemma map_Inf {A : set (ideal R)} {f : R →+* S} (hf : function.surjective f) :
(∀ J ∈ A, ring_hom.ker f ≤ J) → map f (Inf A) = Inf (map f '' A) :=
begin
refine λ h, le_antisymm (le_Inf _) _,
{ intros j hj y hy,
cases (mem_map_iff_of_surjective f hf).1 hy with x hx,
cases (set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hj with J hJ,
rw [← hJ.right, ← hx.right],
exact mem_map_of_mem f (Inf_le_of_le hJ.left (le_of_eq rfl) hx.left) },
{ intros y hy,
cases hf y with x hx,
refine hx ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f _),
have : ∀ I ∈ A, y ∈ map f I, by simpa using hy,
rw [submodule.mem_Inf],
intros J hJ,
rcases (mem_map_iff_of_surjective f hf).1 (this J hJ) with ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩,
have : x - x' ∈ J,
{ apply h J hJ,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ring_hom.map_sub, hx, sub_self] },
simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using J.add_mem this hx' }
end
theorem map_is_prime_of_surjective {f : R →+* S} (hf : function.surjective f) {I : ideal R}
[H : is_prime I] (hk : ring_hom.ker f ≤ I) : is_prime (map f I) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, H.ne_top (eq_top_iff.2 _), λ x y, _⟩,
{ replace h := congr_arg (comap f) h,
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, comap_top] at h,
exact h ▸ sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) hk },
{ refine λ hxy, (hf x).rec_on (λ a ha, (hf y).rec_on (λ b hb, _)),
rw [← ha, ← hb, ← ring_hom.map_mul, mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf] at hxy,
rcases hxy with ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← ring_hom.map_sub] at hc',
have : a * b ∈ I,
{ convert I.sub_mem hc (hk (hc' : c - a * b ∈ f.ker)),
ring },
exact (H.mem_or_mem this).imp (λ h, ha ▸ mem_map_of_mem f h) (λ h, hb ▸ mem_map_of_mem f h) }
end
theorem map_is_prime_of_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) {I : ideal R} [is_prime I] :
is_prime (map (f : R →+* S) I) :=
map_is_prime_of_surjective f.surjective $ by simp
theorem map_radical_of_surjective {f : R →+* S} (hf : function.surjective f) {I : ideal R}
(h : ring_hom.ker f ≤ I) : map f (I.radical) = (map f I).radical :=
begin
rw [radical_eq_Inf, radical_eq_Inf],
have : ∀ J ∈ {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ J.is_prime}, f.ker ≤ J := λ J hJ, le_trans h hJ.left,
convert map_Inf hf this,
refine funext (λ j, propext ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintros ⟨hj, hj'⟩,
haveI : j.is_prime := hj',
exact ⟨comap f j, ⟨⟨map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hj, comap_is_prime f j⟩,
map_comap_of_surjective f hf j⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨J, ⟨hJ, hJ'⟩⟩,
haveI : J.is_prime := hJ.right,
refine ⟨hJ' ▸ map_mono hJ.left, hJ' ▸ map_is_prime_of_surjective hf (le_trans h hJ.left)⟩ },
end
@[simp] lemma bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff (I : ideal R) :
(⊥ : ideal I.quotient).is_maximal ↔ I.is_maximal :=
⟨λ hI, (@mk_ker _ _ I) ▸
@comap_is_maximal_of_surjective _ _ _ _ (quotient.mk I) ⊥ quotient.mk_surjective hI,
λ hI, @bot_is_maximal _ (@quotient.field _ _ I hI) ⟩
section quotient_algebra
variables (R) {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [algebra R A]
/-- The `R`-algebra structure on `A/I` for an `R`-algebra `A` -/
instance {I : ideal A} : algebra R (ideal.quotient I) :=
(ring_hom.comp (ideal.quotient.mk I) (algebra_map R A)).to_algebra
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R] I.quotient` as morphism of `R`-algebras, for `I` an ideal of
`A`, where `A` is an `R`-algebra. -/
def quotient.mkₐ (I : ideal A) : A →ₐ[R] I.quotient :=
⟨λ a, submodule.quotient.mk a, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, λ _, rfl⟩
lemma quotient.alg_map_eq (I : ideal A) :
algebra_map R I.quotient = (algebra_map A I.quotient).comp (algebra_map R A) :=
by simp only [ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra, ring_hom.comp_id]
instance [algebra S A] [algebra S R] [is_scalar_tower S R A]
{I : ideal A} : is_scalar_tower S R (ideal.quotient I) :=
is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq' $ by
rw [quotient.alg_map_eq R, quotient.alg_map_eq S, ring_hom.comp_assoc,
is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq S R A]
lemma quotient.mkₐ_to_ring_hom (I : ideal A) :
(quotient.mkₐ R I).to_ring_hom = ideal.quotient.mk I := rfl
@[simp] lemma quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk (I : ideal A) :
⇑(quotient.mkₐ R I) = ideal.quotient.mk I := rfl
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R] I.quotient` is surjective. -/
lemma quotient.mkₐ_surjective (I : ideal A) : function.surjective (quotient.mkₐ R I) :=
surjective_quot_mk _
/-- The kernel of `A →ₐ[R] I.quotient` is `I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma quotient.mkₐ_ker (I : ideal A) : (quotient.mkₐ R I).to_ring_hom.ker = I :=
ideal.mk_ker
variables {R} {B : Type*} [comm_ring B] [algebra R B]
lemma ker_lift.map_smul (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (r : R) (x : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient) :
f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift (r • x) = r • f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift x :=
begin
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := quotient.mkₐ_surjective R _ x,
rw [← alg_hom.map_smul, quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, ring_hom.ker_lift_mk],
exact f.map_smul _ _
end
/-- The induced algebras morphism from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse`) /
is surjective (`quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_surjective`).
-/
def ker_lift_alg (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient →ₐ[R] B :=
alg_hom.mk' f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift (λ _ _, ker_lift.map_smul f _ _)
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_alg_mk (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (a : A) :
ker_lift_alg f (quotient.mk f.to_ring_hom.ker a) = f a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_alg_to_ring_hom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) :
(ker_lift_alg f).to_ring_hom = ring_hom.ker_lift f := rfl
/-- The induced algebra morphism from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
lemma ker_lift_alg_injective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : function.injective (ker_lift_alg f) :=
ring_hom.ker_lift_injective f
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for agebras, computable version. -/
def quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse
{f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B → A} (hf : function.right_inverse g f) :
f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ ..ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse (λ x, show f.to_ring_hom (g x) = x, from hf x),
..ker_lift_alg f}
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B → A}
(hf : function.right_inverse g f) (x : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient) :
quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse hf x = ker_lift_alg f x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse_symm.apply {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B → A}
(hf : function.right_inverse g f) (x : B) :
(quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse hf).symm x = quotient.mkₐ R f.to_ring_hom.ker (g x) :=
rfl
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for agebras. -/
noncomputable def quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_surjective
{f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hf : function.surjective f) : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient ≃ₐ[R] B :=
quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse (classical.some_spec hf.has_right_inverse)
/-- The ring hom `R/I →+* S/J` induced by a ring hom `f : R →+* S` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)` -/
def quotient_map {I : ideal R} (J : ideal S) (f : R →+* S) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) :
I.quotient →+* J.quotient :=
(quotient.lift I ((quotient.mk J).comp f) (λ _ ha,
by simpa [function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] using hIJ ha))
@[simp]
lemma quotient_map_mk {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
{x : R} : quotient_map I f H (quotient.mk J x) = quotient.mk I (f x) :=
quotient.lift_mk J _ _
lemma quotient_map_comp_mk {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} (H : J ≤ I.comap f) :
(quotient_map I f H).comp (quotient.mk J) = (quotient.mk I).comp f :=
ring_hom.ext (λ x, by simp only [function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, ideal.quotient_map_mk])
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `map f (map f.symm) = I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma map_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : (I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I :=
by simp [← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, map_map]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `comap f.symm (comap f) = I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma comap_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I :=
by simp [← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, comap_comap]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
lemma map_comap_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (le_comap_of_map_le (map_of_equiv I f).le)
(le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ f.surjective (comap_of_equiv I f).le)
/-- The ring equiv `R/I ≃+* S/J` induced by a ring equiv `f : R ≃+** S`, where `J = f(I)`. -/
@[simps]
def quotient_equiv (I : ideal R) (J : ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S)) :
I.quotient ≃+* J.quotient :=
{ inv_fun := quotient_map I ↑f.symm (by {rw hIJ, exact le_of_eq (map_comap_of_equiv I f)}),
left_inv := by {rintro ⟨r⟩, simp },
right_inv := by {rintro ⟨s⟩, simp },
..quotient_map J ↑f (by {rw hIJ, exact @le_comap_map _ S _ _ _ _}) }
/-- `H` and `h` are kept as separate hypothesis since H is used in constructing the quotient map. -/
lemma quotient_map_injective' {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(h : I.comap f ≤ J) : function.injective (quotient_map I f H) :=
begin
refine (quotient_map I f H).injective_iff.2 (λ a ha, _),
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective a,
rw [quotient_map_mk, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] at ha,
exact (quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem).mpr (h ha),
end
/-- If we take `J = I.comap f` then `quotient_map` is injective automatically. -/
lemma quotient_map_injective {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} :
function.injective (quotient_map I f le_rfl) :=
quotient_map_injective' le_rfl
lemma quotient_map_surjective {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(hf : function.surjective f) : function.surjective (quotient_map I f H) :=
λ x, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective x in
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x in ⟨(quotient.mk J) y, by simp [hx, hy]⟩
/-- Commutativity of a square is preserved when taking quotients by an ideal. -/
lemma comp_quotient_map_eq_of_comp_eq {R' S' : Type*} [comm_ring R'] [comm_ring S']
{f : R →+* S} {f' : R' →+* S'} {g : R →+* R'} {g' : S →+* S'} (hfg : f'.comp g = g'.comp f)
(I : ideal S') : (quotient_map I g' le_rfl).comp (quotient_map (I.comap g') f le_rfl) =
(quotient_map I f' le_rfl).comp (quotient_map (I.comap f') g
(le_of_eq (trans (comap_comap f g') (hfg ▸ (comap_comap g f'))))) :=
begin
refine ring_hom.ext (λ a, _),
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective a,
simp only [ring_hom.comp_apply, quotient_map_mk],
exact congr_arg (quotient.mk I) (trans (g'.comp_apply f r).symm (hfg ▸ (f'.comp_apply g r))),
end
variables {I : ideal R} {J: ideal S} [algebra R S]
/-- The algebra hom `A/I →+* S/J` induced by an algebra hom `f : A →ₐ[R] S` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)`. -/
def quotient_mapₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal S) (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) :
I.quotient →ₐ[R] J.quotient :=
{ commutes' := λ r,
begin
have h : (algebra_map R I.quotient) r = (quotient.mk I) (algebra_map R A r) := rfl,
simpa [h]
end
..quotient_map J ↑f hIJ }
@[simp]
lemma quotient_map_mkₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal S) (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (H : I ≤ J.comap f)
{x : A} : quotient_mapₐ J f H (quotient.mk I x) = quotient.mkₐ R J (f x) := rfl
lemma quotient_map_comp_mkₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal S) (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (H : I ≤ J.comap f) :
(quotient_mapₐ J f H).comp (quotient.mkₐ R I) = (quotient.mkₐ R J).comp f :=
alg_hom.ext (λ x, by simp only [quotient_map_mkₐ, quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, alg_hom.comp_apply])
/-- The algebra equiv `A/I ≃ₐ[R] S/J` induced by an algebra equiv `f : A ≃ₐ[R] S`,
where`J = f(I)`. -/
def quotient_equiv_alg (I : ideal A) (J : ideal S) (f : A ≃ₐ[R] S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : A →+* S)) :
I.quotient ≃ₐ[R] J.quotient :=
{ commutes' := λ r,
begin
have h : (algebra_map R I.quotient) r = (quotient.mk I) (algebra_map R A r) := rfl,
simpa [h]
end,
..quotient_equiv I J (f : A ≃+* S) hIJ }
@[priority 100]
instance quotient_algebra : algebra (J.comap (algebra_map R S)).quotient J.quotient :=
(quotient_map J (algebra_map R S) (le_of_eq rfl)).to_algebra
lemma algebra_map_quotient_injective :
function.injective (algebra_map (J.comap (algebra_map R S)).quotient J.quotient) :=
begin
rintros ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ hab,
replace hab := quotient.eq.mp hab,
rw ← ring_hom.map_sub at hab,
exact quotient.eq.mpr hab
end
end quotient_algebra
end ideal
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
-- It is even a semialgebra. But those aren't in mathlib yet.
instance module_submodule : module (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
{ smul_add := smul_sup,
add_smul := sup_smul,
mul_smul := submodule.smul_assoc,
one_smul := by simp,
zero_smul := bot_smul,
smul_zero := smul_bot }
end submodule
namespace ring_hom
variables {A B C : Type*} [comm_ring A] [comm_ring B] [comm_ring C]
variables (f : A →+* B) (f_inv : B → A)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `lift_of_right_inverse` -/
def lift_of_right_inverse_aux
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
B →+* C :=
{ to_fun := λ b, g (f_inv b),
map_one' :=
begin
rw [← g.map_one, ← sub_eq_zero, ← g.map_sub, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, f.map_one],
exact hf 1
end,
map_mul' :=
begin
intros x y,
rw [← g.map_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← g.map_sub, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, f.map_mul],
simp only [hf _],
end,
.. add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse f.to_add_monoid_hom f_inv hf ⟨g.to_add_monoid_hom, hg⟩ }
@[simp] lemma lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (a : A) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g hg) (f a) = g a :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply f_inv hf ⟨g.to_add_monoid_hom, hg⟩ a
/-- `lift_of_right_inverse f hf g hg` is the unique ring homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp`),
* where `f : A →+* B` is has a right_inverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : B →+* C` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `ring_hom.eq_lift_of_right_inverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
A .
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
B ----> C
∃!φ
```
-/
def lift_of_right_inverse
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (B →+* C) :=
{ to_fun := λ g, f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g.1 g.2,
inv_fun := λ φ, ⟨φ.comp f, λ x hx, (mem_ker _).mpr $ by simp [(mem_ker _).mp hx]⟩,
left_inv := λ g, by {
ext,
simp only [comp_apply, lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply, subtype.coe_mk,
subtype.val_eq_coe], },
right_inv := λ φ, by {
ext b,
simp [lift_of_right_inverse_aux, hf b], } }
/-- A non-computable version of `ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `function.surj_inv`. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable abbreviation lift_of_surjective
(hf : function.surjective f) : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (B →+* C) :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse (function.surj_inv hf) (function.right_inverse_surj_inv hf)
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) (x : A) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g x :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f)
(g : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
ring_hom.ext $ f.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
lemma eq_lift_of_right_inverse (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : B →+* C) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = (f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩) :=
begin
simp_rw ←hh,
exact ((f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm,
end
end ring_hom
|
1cc5c817a8c9217cb4539405bc38dac77573a336 | 7850aae797be6c31052ce4633d86f5991178d3df | /src/Lean/Server/Requests.lean | ceb13dbdbdc381f3b96c56775f7fa8146cb08bd2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | miriamgoetze/lean4 | 4dc24d4dbd360cc969713647c2958c6691947d16 | 062cc5d5672250be456a168e9c7b9299a9c69bdb | refs/heads/master | 1,685,865,971,011 | 1,624,107,703,000 | 1,624,107,703,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,449 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Wojciech Nawrocki. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wojciech Nawrocki, Marc Huisinga
-/
import Lean.DeclarationRange
import Lean.Data.Json
import Lean.Data.Lsp
import Lean.Server.FileSource
import Lean.Server.FileWorker.Utils
/-! We maintain a global map of LSP request handlers. This allows user code such as plugins
to register its own handlers, for example to support ITP functionality such as goal state
visualization.
For details of how to register one, see `registerLspRequestHandler`. -/
namespace Lean.Server.Requests
structure RequestError where
code : JsonRpc.ErrorCode
message : String
namespace RequestError
open JsonRpc
def fileChanged : RequestError :=
{ code := ErrorCode.contentModified
message := "File changed." }
def methodNotFound (method : String) : RequestError :=
{ code := ErrorCode.methodNotFound
message := s!"No request handler found for '{method}'" }
instance : Coe IO.Error RequestError where
coe e := { code := ErrorCode.internalError
message := toString e }
def toLspResponseError (id : RequestID) (e : RequestError) : ResponseError Unit :=
{ id := id
code := e.code
message := e.message }
end RequestError
structure RequestContext where
srcSearchPath : SearchPath
docRef : IO.Ref FileWorker.EditableDocument
abbrev RequestTask α := Task (Except RequestError α)
/-- Workers execute request handlers in this monad. -/
abbrev RequestM := ReaderT RequestContext <| ExceptT RequestError IO
namespace RequestM
open FileWorker
open Snapshots
def readDoc : RequestM EditableDocument := fun rc =>
rc.docRef.get
def asTask (t : RequestM α) : RequestM (RequestTask α) := fun rc => do
let t ← IO.asTask <| t rc
return t.map fun
| Except.error e => throwThe RequestError e
| Except.ok v => v
def mapTask (t : Task α) (f : α → RequestM β) : RequestM (RequestTask β) := fun rc => do
let t ← (IO.mapTask · t) fun a => f a rc
return t.map fun
| Except.error e => throwThe RequestError e
| Except.ok v => v
def bindTask (t : Task α) (f : α → RequestM (RequestTask β)) : RequestM (RequestTask β) := fun rc => do
let t ← IO.bindTask t fun a => do
match ← f a rc with
| Except.error e => return Task.pure <| Except.ok <| Except.error e
| Except.ok t => return t.map Except.ok
return t.map fun
| Except.error e => throwThe RequestError e
| Except.ok v => v
/-- Create a task which waits for a snapshot matching `p`, handles various errors,
and if a matching snapshot was found executes `x` with it. If not found, the task
executes `notFoundX`. -/
def withWaitFindSnap (doc : EditableDocument) (p : Snapshot → Bool)
(notFoundX : RequestM β)
(x : Snapshot → RequestM β)
: RequestM (RequestTask β) := do
let findTask ← doc.cmdSnaps.waitFind? p
mapTask findTask fun
/- The elaboration task that we're waiting for may be aborted if the file contents change.
In that case, we reply with the `fileChanged` error. Thanks to this, the server doesn't
get bogged down in requests for an old state of the document. -/
| Except.error FileWorker.ElabTaskError.aborted =>
throwThe RequestError RequestError.fileChanged
| Except.error (FileWorker.ElabTaskError.ioError e) =>
throwThe IO.Error e
| Except.error FileWorker.ElabTaskError.eof => notFoundX
| Except.ok none => notFoundX
| Except.ok (some snap) => x snap
end RequestM
/- The global request handlers table. -/
section HandlerTable
open Lsp
private structure RequestHandler where
fileSource : Json → Except RequestError Lsp.DocumentUri
handle : Json → RequestM (RequestTask Json)
builtin_initialize requestHandlers : IO.Ref (Std.PersistentHashMap String RequestHandler) ←
IO.mkRef {}
private def parseParams (paramType : Type) [FromJson paramType] (params : Json) : Except RequestError paramType :=
fromJson? params |>.mapError fun inner =>
{ code := JsonRpc.ErrorCode.parseError
message := s!"Cannot parse request params: {params.compress}\n{inner}" }
/-- NB: This method may only be called in `initialize`/`builtin_initialize` blocks.
A registration consists of:
- a type of JSON-parsable request data `paramType`
- a `FileSource` instance for it so the system knows where to route requests
- a type of JSON-serializable response data `respType`
- an actual `handler` which runs in the `RequestM` monad and is expected
to produce an asynchronous `RequestTask` which does any waiting/computation
A handler task may be cancelled at any time, so it should check the cancellation token when possible
to handle this cooperatively. Any exceptions thrown in a request handler will be reported to the client
as LSP error responses. -/
def registerLspRequestHandler (method : String)
paramType [FromJson paramType] [FileSource paramType]
respType [ToJson respType]
(handler : paramType → RequestM (RequestTask respType)) : IO Unit := do
if !(← IO.initializing) then
throw <| IO.userError s!"Failed to register LSP request handler for '{method}': only possible during initialization"
if (←requestHandlers.get).contains method then
throw <| IO.userError s!"Failed to register LSP request handler for '{method}': already registered"
let fileSource := fun j =>
parseParams paramType j |>.map fun p =>
Lsp.fileSource p
let handle := fun j => do
let params ← parseParams paramType j
let t ← handler params
t.map <| Except.map ToJson.toJson
requestHandlers.modify fun rhs => rhs.insert method { fileSource, handle }
private def lookupLspRequestHandler (method : String) : IO (Option RequestHandler) := do
(← requestHandlers.get).find? method
def routeLspRequest (method : String) (params : Json) : IO (Except RequestError DocumentUri) := do
match (← lookupLspRequestHandler method) with
| none => return Except.error <| RequestError.methodNotFound method
| some rh => return rh.fileSource params
def handleLspRequest (method : String) (params : Json) : RequestM (RequestTask Json) := do
match (← lookupLspRequestHandler method) with
| none => throwThe IO.Error <| IO.userError s!"internal server error: request '{method}' routed through watchdog but unknown in worker; are both using the same plugins?"
| some rh => rh.handle params
end HandlerTable
end Lean.Server.Requests |
6a6378f885300e8e61ea2babb1fcc96565833703 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/algebra/lie_algebra.lean | 05f139c6c44102e5709c83b5c7d10d0d3c376347 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,028 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import ring_theory.algebra
import linear_algebra.linear_action
import linear_algebra.bilinear_form
import tactic.noncomm_ring
/-!
# Lie algebras
This file defines Lie rings, and Lie algebras over a commutative ring. It shows how these arise from
associative rings and algebras via the ring commutator. In particular it defines the Lie algebra
of endomorphisms of a module as well as of the algebra of square matrices over a commutative ring.
It also includes definitions of morphisms of Lie algebras, Lie subalgebras, Lie modules, Lie
submodules, and the quotient of a Lie algebra by an ideal.
## Notations
We introduce the notation ⁅x, y⁆ for the Lie bracket. Note that these are the Unicode "square with
quill" brackets rather than the usual square brackets.
We also introduce the notations L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L' for a morphism of Lie algebras over a commutative ring R,
and L →ₗ⁅⁆ L' for the same, when the ring is implicit.
## Implementation notes
Lie algebras are defined as modules with a compatible Lie ring structure, and thus are partially
unbundled. Since they extend Lie rings, these are also partially unbundled.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 1--3*][bourbaki1975]
## Tags
lie bracket, ring commutator, jacobi identity, lie ring, lie algebra
-/
universes u v w w₁
/--
A binary operation, intended use in Lie algebras and similar structures.
-/
class has_bracket (L : Type v) := (bracket : L → L → L)
notation `⁅`x`,` y`⁆` := has_bracket.bracket x y
/-- An Abelian Lie algebra is one in which all brackets vanish. Arguably this class belongs in the
`has_bracket` namespace but it seems much more user-friendly to compromise slightly and put it in
the `lie_algebra` namespace. -/
class lie_algebra.is_abelian (L : Type v) [has_bracket L] [has_zero L] : Prop :=
(abelian : ∀ (x y : L), ⁅x, y⁆ = 0)
namespace ring_commutator
variables {A : Type v} [ring A]
/--
The ring commutator captures the extent to which a ring is commutative. It is identically zero
exactly when the ring is commutative.
-/
def commutator (x y : A) := x*y - y*x
local notation `⁅`x`,` y`⁆` := commutator x y
@[simp] lemma add_left (x y z : A) :
⁅x + y, z⁆ = ⁅x, z⁆ + ⁅y, z⁆ :=
by simp [commutator, right_distrib, left_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp] lemma add_right (x y z : A) :
⁅z, x + y⁆ = ⁅z, x⁆ + ⁅z, y⁆ :=
by simp [commutator, right_distrib, left_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp] lemma alternate (x : A) :
⁅x, x⁆ = 0 :=
by simp [commutator]
lemma jacobi (x y z : A) :
⁅x, ⁅y, z⁆⁆ + ⁅y, ⁅z, x⁆⁆ + ⁅z, ⁅x, y⁆⁆ = 0 :=
by { unfold commutator, noncomm_ring, }
end ring_commutator
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/--
A Lie ring is an additive group with compatible product, known as the bracket, satisfying the
Jacobi identity. The bracket is not associative unless it is identically zero.
-/
@[protect_proj] class lie_ring (L : Type v) extends add_comm_group L, has_bracket L :=
(add_lie : ∀ (x y z : L), ⁅x + y, z⁆ = ⁅x, z⁆ + ⁅y, z⁆)
(lie_add : ∀ (x y z : L), ⁅z, x + y⁆ = ⁅z, x⁆ + ⁅z, y⁆)
(lie_self : ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, x⁆ = 0)
(jacobi : ∀ (x y z : L), ⁅x, ⁅y, z⁆⁆ + ⁅y, ⁅z, x⁆⁆ + ⁅z, ⁅x, y⁆⁆ = 0)
end prio
section lie_ring
variables {L : Type v} [lie_ring L]
@[simp] lemma add_lie (x y z : L) : ⁅x + y, z⁆ = ⁅x, z⁆ + ⁅y, z⁆ := lie_ring.add_lie x y z
@[simp] lemma lie_add (x y z : L) : ⁅z, x + y⁆ = ⁅z, x⁆ + ⁅z, y⁆ := lie_ring.lie_add x y z
@[simp] lemma lie_self (x : L) : ⁅x, x⁆ = 0 := lie_ring.lie_self x
@[simp] lemma lie_skew (x y : L) :
-⁅y, x⁆ = ⁅x, y⁆ :=
begin
symmetry,
rw [←sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, sub_neg_eq_add],
have H : ⁅x + y, x + y⁆ = 0, from lie_self _,
rw add_lie at H,
simpa using H,
end
@[simp] lemma lie_zero (x : L) :
⁅x, 0⁆ = 0 :=
begin
have H : ⁅x, 0⁆ + ⁅x, 0⁆ = ⁅x, 0⁆ + 0 := by { rw ←lie_add, simp, },
exact add_left_cancel H,
end
@[simp] lemma zero_lie (x : L) :
⁅0, x⁆ = 0 := by { rw [←lie_skew, lie_zero], simp, }
@[simp] lemma neg_lie (x y : L) :
⁅-x, y⁆ = -⁅x, y⁆ := by { rw [←sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, sub_neg_eq_add, ←add_lie], simp, }
@[simp] lemma lie_neg (x y : L) :
⁅x, -y⁆ = -⁅x, y⁆ := by { rw [←lie_skew, ←lie_skew], simp, }
@[simp] lemma gsmul_lie (x y : L) (n : ℤ) :
⁅n • x, y⁆ = n • ⁅x, y⁆ :=
add_monoid_hom.map_gsmul ⟨λ x, ⁅x, y⁆, zero_lie y, λ _ _, add_lie _ _ _⟩ _ _
@[simp] lemma lie_gsmul (x y : L) (n : ℤ) :
⁅x, n • y⁆ = n • ⁅x, y⁆ :=
begin
rw [←lie_skew, ←lie_skew x, gsmul_lie],
unfold has_scalar.smul, rw gsmul_neg,
end
/--
An associative ring gives rise to a Lie ring by taking the bracket to be the ring commutator.
-/
def lie_ring.of_associative_ring (A : Type v) [ring A] : lie_ring A :=
{ bracket := ring_commutator.commutator,
add_lie := ring_commutator.add_left,
lie_add := ring_commutator.add_right,
lie_self := ring_commutator.alternate,
jacobi := ring_commutator.jacobi }
local attribute [instance] lie_ring.of_associative_ring
lemma lie_ring.of_associative_ring_bracket (A : Type v) [ring A] (x y : A) :
⁅x, y⁆ = x*y - y*x := rfl
lemma commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring (A : Type v) [ring A] :
is_commutative A (*) ↔ lie_algebra.is_abelian A :=
begin
have h₁ : is_commutative A (*) ↔ ∀ (a b : A), a * b = b * a := ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩,
have h₂ : lie_algebra.is_abelian A ↔ ∀ (a b : A), ⁅a, b⁆ = 0 := ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩,
simp only [h₁, h₂, lie_ring.of_associative_ring_bracket, sub_eq_zero],
end
end lie_ring
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/--
A Lie algebra is a module with compatible product, known as the bracket, satisfying the Jacobi
identity. Forgetting the scalar multiplication, every Lie algebra is a Lie ring.
-/
class lie_algebra (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] extends semimodule R L :=
(lie_smul : ∀ (t : R) (x y : L), ⁅x, t • y⁆ = t • ⁅x, y⁆)
end prio
@[simp] lemma lie_smul (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
(t : R) (x y : L) : ⁅x, t • y⁆ = t • ⁅x, y⁆ :=
lie_algebra.lie_smul t x y
@[simp] lemma smul_lie (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
(t : R) (x y : L) : ⁅t • x, y⁆ = t • ⁅x, y⁆ :=
by { rw [←lie_skew, ←lie_skew x y], simp [-lie_skew], }
namespace lie_algebra
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A morphism of Lie algebras is a linear map respecting the bracket operations. -/
structure morphism (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (L' : Type w)
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [lie_ring L'] [lie_algebra R L']
extends linear_map R L L' :=
(map_lie : ∀ {x y : L}, to_fun ⁅x, y⁆ = ⁅to_fun x, to_fun y⁆)
attribute [nolint doc_blame] lie_algebra.morphism.to_linear_map
infixr ` →ₗ⁅⁆ `:25 := morphism _
notation L ` →ₗ⁅`:25 R:25 `⁆ `:0 L':0 := morphism R L L'
section morphism_properties
variables {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} {L₃ : Type w₁}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L₁] [lie_ring L₂] [lie_ring L₃]
variables [lie_algebra R L₁] [lie_algebra R L₂] [lie_algebra R L₃]
instance : has_coe (L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) (L₁ →ₗ[R] L₂) := ⟨morphism.to_linear_map⟩
/-- see Note [function coercion] -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) := ⟨_, morphism.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma map_lie (f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) (x y : L₁) : f ⁅x, y⁆ = ⁅f x, f y⁆ := morphism.map_lie f
/-- The constant 0 map is a Lie algebra morphism. -/
instance : has_zero (L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) := ⟨{ map_lie := by simp, ..(0 : L₁ →ₗ[R] L₂)}⟩
/-- The identity map is a Lie algebra morphism. -/
instance : has_one (L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₁) := ⟨{ map_lie := by simp, ..(1 : L₁ →ₗ[R] L₁)}⟩
instance : inhabited (L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) := ⟨0⟩
/-- The composition of morphisms is a morphism. -/
def morphism.comp (f : L₂ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₃) (g : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₃ :=
{ map_lie := λ x y, by { change f (g ⁅x, y⁆) = ⁅f (g x), f (g y)⁆, rw [map_lie, map_lie], },
..linear_map.comp f.to_linear_map g.to_linear_map }
lemma morphism.comp_apply (f : L₂ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₃) (g : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) (x : L₁) :
f.comp g x = f (g x) := rfl
/-- The inverse of a bijective morphism is a morphism. -/
def morphism.inverse (f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) (g : L₂ → L₁)
(h₁ : function.left_inverse g f) (h₂ : function.right_inverse g f) : L₂ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₁ :=
{ map_lie := λ x y, by {
calc g ⁅x, y⁆ = g ⁅f (g x), f (g y)⁆ : by { conv_lhs { rw [←h₂ x, ←h₂ y], }, }
... = g (f ⁅g x, g y⁆) : by rw map_lie
... = ⁅g x, g y⁆ : (h₁ _), },
..linear_map.inverse f.to_linear_map g h₁ h₂ }
end morphism_properties
/-- An equivalence of Lie algebras is a morphism which is also a linear equivalence. We could
instead define an equivalence to be a morphism which is also a (plain) equivalence. However it is
more convenient to define via linear equivalence to get `.to_linear_equiv` for free. -/
structure equiv (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (L' : Type w)
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [lie_ring L'] [lie_algebra R L']
extends L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L', L ≃ₗ[R] L'
attribute [nolint doc_blame] lie_algebra.equiv.to_morphism
attribute [nolint doc_blame] lie_algebra.equiv.to_linear_equiv
notation L ` ≃ₗ⁅`:50 R `⁆ ` L' := equiv R L L'
namespace equiv
variables {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} {L₃ : Type w₁}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L₁] [lie_ring L₂] [lie_ring L₃]
variables [lie_algebra R L₁] [lie_algebra R L₂] [lie_algebra R L₃]
instance : has_one (L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₁) :=
⟨{ map_lie := λ x y, by { change ((1 : L₁→ₗ[R] L₁) ⁅x, y⁆) = ⁅(1 : L₁→ₗ[R] L₁) x, (1 : L₁→ₗ[R] L₁) y⁆, simp, },
..(1 : L₁ ≃ₗ[R] L₁)}⟩
instance : inhabited (L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₁) := ⟨1⟩
/-- Lie algebra equivalences are reflexive. -/
@[refl]
def refl : L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₁ := 1
/-- Lie algebra equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm (e : L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) : L₂ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₁ :=
{ ..morphism.inverse e.to_morphism e.inv_fun e.left_inv e.right_inv,
..e.to_linear_equiv.symm }
/-- Lie algebra equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans (e₁ : L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) (e₂ : L₂ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₃) : L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₃ :=
{ ..morphism.comp e₂.to_morphism e₁.to_morphism,
..linear_equiv.trans e₁.to_linear_equiv e₂.to_linear_equiv }
end equiv
namespace direct_sum
open dfinsupp
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
variables {ι : Type v} [decidable_eq ι] {L : ι → Type w}
variables [Π i, lie_ring (L i)] [Π i, lie_algebra R (L i)]
/-- The direct sum of Lie rings carries a natural Lie ring structure. -/
instance : lie_ring (direct_sum ι L) := {
bracket := zip_with (λ i, λ x y, ⁅x, y⁆) (λ i, lie_zero 0),
add_lie := λ x y z, by { ext, simp only [zip_with_apply, add_apply, add_lie], },
lie_add := λ x y z, by { ext, simp only [zip_with_apply, add_apply, lie_add], },
lie_self := λ x, by { ext, simp only [zip_with_apply, add_apply, lie_self, zero_apply], },
jacobi := λ x y z, by { ext, simp only [zip_with_apply, add_apply, lie_ring.jacobi, zero_apply], },
..(infer_instance : add_comm_group _) }
@[simp] lemma bracket_apply {x y : direct_sum ι L} {i : ι} :
⁅x, y⁆ i = ⁅x i, y i⁆ := zip_with_apply
/-- The direct sum of Lie algebras carries a natural Lie algebra structure. -/
instance : lie_algebra R (direct_sum ι L) :=
{ lie_smul := λ c x y, by { ext, simp only [zip_with_apply, smul_apply, bracket_apply, lie_smul], },
..(infer_instance : module R _) }
end direct_sum
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
/--
An associative algebra gives rise to a Lie algebra by taking the bracket to be the ring commutator.
-/
def of_associative_algebra (A : Type v) [ring A] [algebra R A] :
@lie_algebra R A _ (lie_ring.of_associative_ring _) :=
{ lie_smul := λ t x y,
by rw [lie_ring.of_associative_ring_bracket, lie_ring.of_associative_ring_bracket,
algebra.mul_smul_comm, algebra.smul_mul_assoc, smul_sub], }
instance (M : Type v) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] : lie_ring (module.End R M) :=
lie_ring.of_associative_ring _
local attribute [instance] lie_ring.of_associative_ring
local attribute [instance] lie_algebra.of_associative_algebra
/-- The map `of_associative_algebra` associating a Lie algebra to an associative algebra is
functorial. -/
def of_associative_algebra_hom {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
[comm_ring R] [ring A] [ring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : A →ₗ⁅R⁆ B :=
{ map_lie := λ x y, show f ⁅x,y⁆ = ⁅f x,f y⁆,
by simp only [lie_ring.of_associative_ring_bracket, alg_hom.map_sub, alg_hom.map_mul],
..f.to_linear_map, }
@[simp] lemma of_associative_algebra_hom_id {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A] :
of_associative_algebra_hom (alg_hom.id R A) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_associative_algebra_hom_comp {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w₁}
[comm_ring R] [ring A] [ring B] [ring C] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] [algebra R C]
(f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
of_associative_algebra_hom (g.comp f) = (of_associative_algebra_hom g).comp (of_associative_algebra_hom f) := rfl
/--
An important class of Lie algebras are those arising from the associative algebra structure on
module endomorphisms.
-/
instance of_endomorphism_algebra (M : Type v) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] :
lie_algebra R (module.End R M) :=
of_associative_algebra (module.End R M)
lemma endo_algebra_bracket (M : Type v) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] (f g : module.End R M) :
⁅f, g⁆ = f.comp g - g.comp f := rfl
/--
The adjoint action of a Lie algebra on itself.
-/
def Ad : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ module.End R L := {
to_fun := λ x, {
to_fun := has_bracket.bracket x,
add := by { intros, apply lie_add, },
smul := by { intros, apply lie_smul, } },
add := by { intros, ext, simp, },
smul := by { intros, ext, simp, },
map_lie := by {
intros x y, ext z,
rw endo_algebra_bracket,
suffices : ⁅⁅x, y⁆, z⁆ = ⁅x, ⁅y, z⁆⁆ + ⁅⁅x, z⁆, y⁆, by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg],
rw [eq_comm, ←lie_skew ⁅x, y⁆ z, ←lie_skew ⁅x, z⁆ y, ←lie_skew x z, lie_neg, neg_neg,
←sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, sub_neg_eq_add, lie_ring.jacobi], } }
end lie_algebra
section lie_subalgebra
variables (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/--
A Lie subalgebra of a Lie algebra is submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie algebra.
-/
structure lie_subalgebra extends submodule R L :=
(lie_mem : ∀ {x y}, x ∈ carrier → y ∈ carrier → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ carrier)
attribute [nolint doc_blame] lie_subalgebra.to_submodule
/-- The zero algebra is a subalgebra of any Lie algebra. -/
instance : has_zero (lie_subalgebra R L) :=
⟨{ lie_mem := λ x y hx hy, by { rw [((submodule.mem_bot R).1 hx), zero_lie],
exact submodule.zero_mem (0 : submodule R L), },
..(0 : submodule R L) }⟩
instance : inhabited (lie_subalgebra R L) := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_coe (lie_subalgebra R L) (set L) := ⟨lie_subalgebra.carrier⟩
instance lie_subalgebra_coe_submodule : has_coe (lie_subalgebra R L) (submodule R L) :=
⟨lie_subalgebra.to_submodule⟩
/-- A Lie subalgebra forms a new Lie ring. -/
instance lie_subalgebra_lie_ring (L' : lie_subalgebra R L) : lie_ring L' := {
bracket := λ x y, ⟨⁅x.val, y.val⁆, L'.lie_mem x.property y.property⟩,
lie_add := by { intros, apply set_coe.ext, apply lie_add, },
add_lie := by { intros, apply set_coe.ext, apply add_lie, },
lie_self := by { intros, apply set_coe.ext, apply lie_self, },
jacobi := by { intros, apply set_coe.ext, apply lie_ring.jacobi, } }
/-- A Lie subalgebra forms a new Lie algebra. -/
instance lie_subalgebra_lie_algebra (L' : lie_subalgebra R L) :
@lie_algebra R L' _ (lie_subalgebra_lie_ring _ _ _) :=
{ lie_smul := by { intros, apply set_coe.ext, apply lie_smul } }
local attribute [instance] lie_ring.of_associative_ring
local attribute [instance] lie_algebra.of_associative_algebra
/-- The embedding of a Lie subalgebra into the ambient space as a Lie morphism. -/
def lie_subalgebra.incl
{R : Type u} {L : Type v} [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
(L' : lie_subalgebra R L) : L' →ₗ⁅R⁆ L :=
{ map_lie := λ x y, by { rw [linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, submodule.subtype_apply], refl, },
..L'.to_submodule.subtype }
/-- The range of a morphism of Lie algebras is a Lie subalgebra. -/
def lie_algebra.morphism.range {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w}
[comm_ring R] [lie_ring L₁] [lie_ring L₂] [lie_algebra R L₁] [lie_algebra R L₂]
(f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) : lie_subalgebra R L₂ :=
{ lie_mem := λ x y,
show x ∈ f.to_linear_map.range → y ∈ f.to_linear_map.range → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ f.to_linear_map.range,
by { repeat { rw linear_map.mem_range }, rintros ⟨x', hx⟩ ⟨y', hy⟩, refine ⟨⁅x', y'⁆, _⟩,
rw [←hx, ←hy], change f ⁅x', y'⁆ = ⁅f x', f y'⁆, rw lie_algebra.map_lie, },
..f.to_linear_map.range }
/-- A subalgebra of an associative algebra is a Lie subalgebra of the associated Lie algebra. -/
def lie_subalgebra_of_subalgebra (A : Type v) [ring A] [algebra R A]
(A' : subalgebra R A) : lie_subalgebra R A :=
{ lie_mem := λ x y hx hy, by {
change ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ A', change x ∈ A' at hx, change y ∈ A' at hy,
rw lie_ring.of_associative_ring_bracket,
have hxy := subalgebra.mul_mem A' x y hx hy,
have hyx := subalgebra.mul_mem A' y x hy hx,
exact submodule.sub_mem A'.to_submodule hxy hyx, },
..A'.to_submodule }
end lie_subalgebra
section lie_module
variables (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
variables (M : Type v) [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/--
A Lie module is a module over a commutative ring, together with a linear action of a Lie algebra
on this module, such that the Lie bracket acts as the commutator of endomorphisms.
-/
class lie_module extends linear_action R L M :=
(lie_act : ∀ (l l' : L) (m : M), act ⁅l, l'⁆ m = act l (act l' m) - act l' (act l m))
end prio
@[simp] lemma lie_act [lie_module R L M]
(l l' : L) (m : M) : linear_action.act R ⁅l, l'⁆ m =
linear_action.act R l (linear_action.act R l' m) -
linear_action.act R l' (linear_action.act R l m) :=
lie_module.lie_act l l' m
protected lemma of_endo_map_action (α : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ module.End R M) (x : L) (m : M) :
@linear_action.act R _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (linear_action.of_endo_map R L M α) x m = α x m := rfl
/--
A Lie morphism from a Lie algebra to the endomorphism algebra of a module yields
a Lie module structure.
-/
def lie_module.of_endo_morphism (α : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ module.End R M) : lie_module R L M := {
lie_act := by { intros x y m, rw [of_endo_map_action, lie_algebra.map_lie,
lie_algebra.endo_algebra_bracket], refl, },
..(linear_action.of_endo_map R L M α) }
/--
Every Lie algebra is a module over itself.
-/
instance lie_algebra_self_module : lie_module R L L :=
lie_module.of_endo_morphism R L L lie_algebra.Ad
/--
A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module.
-/
structure lie_submodule [lie_module R L M] extends submodule R M :=
(lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → linear_action.act R x m ∈ carrier)
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance [lie_module R L M] : has_zero (lie_submodule R L M) :=
⟨{ lie_mem := λ x m h, by { rw [((submodule.mem_bot R).1 h), linear_action_zero],
exact submodule.zero_mem (0 : submodule R M), },
..(0 : submodule R M)}⟩
instance [lie_module R L M] : inhabited (lie_submodule R L M) := ⟨0⟩
instance lie_submodule_coe_submodule [lie_module R L M] :
has_coe (lie_submodule R L M) (submodule R M) := ⟨lie_submodule.to_submodule⟩
instance lie_submodule_has_mem [lie_module R L M] :
has_mem M (lie_submodule R L M) := ⟨λ x N, x ∈ (N : set M)⟩
instance lie_submodule_lie_module [lie_module R L M] (N : lie_submodule R L M) :
lie_module R L N := {
act := λ x m, ⟨linear_action.act R x m.val, N.lie_mem m.property⟩,
add_act := by { intros x y m, apply set_coe.ext, apply linear_action.add_act, },
act_add := by { intros x m n, apply set_coe.ext, apply linear_action.act_add, },
act_smul := by { intros r x y, apply set_coe.ext, apply linear_action.act_smul, },
smul_act := by { intros r x y, apply set_coe.ext, apply linear_action.smul_act, },
lie_act := by { intros x y m, apply set_coe.ext, apply lie_module.lie_act, } }
/--
An ideal of a Lie algebra is a Lie submodule of the Lie algebra as a Lie module over itself.
-/
abbreviation lie_ideal := lie_submodule R L L
lemma lie_mem_right (I : lie_ideal R L) (x y : L) (h : y ∈ I) : ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ I := I.lie_mem h
lemma lie_mem_left (I : lie_ideal R L) (x y : L) (h : x ∈ I) : ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ I := by {
rw [←lie_skew, ←neg_lie], apply lie_mem_right, assumption, }
/--
An ideal of a Lie algebra is a Lie subalgebra.
-/
def lie_ideal_subalgebra (I : lie_ideal R L) : lie_subalgebra R L := {
lie_mem := by { intros x y hx hy, apply lie_mem_right, exact hy, },
..I.to_submodule, }
/-- A Lie module is irreducible if its only non-trivial Lie submodule is itself. -/
class lie_module.is_irreducible [lie_module R L M] : Prop :=
(irreducible : ∀ (M' : lie_submodule R L M), (∃ (m : M'), m ≠ 0) → (∀ (m : M), m ∈ M'))
/-- A Lie algebra is simple if it is irreducible as a Lie module over itself via the adjoint
action, and it is non-Abelian. -/
class lie_algebra.is_simple : Prop :=
(simple : lie_module.is_irreducible R L L ∧ ¬lie_algebra.is_abelian L)
end lie_module
namespace lie_submodule
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
variables {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [α : lie_module R L M]
variables (N : lie_submodule R L M) (I : lie_ideal R L)
/--
The quotient of a Lie module by a Lie submodule. It is a Lie module.
-/
abbreviation quotient := N.to_submodule.quotient
namespace quotient
variables {N I}
/--
Map sending an element of `M` to the corresponding element of `M/N`, when `N` is a lie_submodule of
the lie_module `N`.
-/
abbreviation mk : M → N.quotient := submodule.quotient.mk
lemma is_quotient_mk (m : M) :
quotient.mk' m = (mk m : N.quotient) := rfl
/-- Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, together with a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M`, there
is a natural linear map from `L` to the endomorphisms of `M` leaving `N` invariant. -/
def lie_submodule_invariant : L →ₗ[R] submodule.compatible_maps N.to_submodule N.to_submodule :=
linear_map.cod_restrict _ (α.to_linear_action.to_endo_map _ _ _) N.lie_mem
instance lie_quotient_action : linear_action R L N.quotient :=
linear_action.of_endo_map _ _ _ (linear_map.comp (submodule.mapq_linear N N) lie_submodule_invariant)
lemma lie_quotient_action_apply (z : L) (m : M) :
linear_action.act R z (mk m : N.quotient) = mk (linear_action.act R z m) := rfl
/-- The quotient of a Lie module by a Lie submodule, is a Lie module. -/
instance lie_quotient_lie_module : lie_module R L N.quotient :=
{ lie_act := λ x y m', by { apply quotient.induction_on' m', intros m, rw is_quotient_mk,
repeat { rw lie_quotient_action_apply, }, rw lie_act, refl, },
..quotient.lie_quotient_action, }
instance lie_quotient_has_bracket : has_bracket (quotient I) := ⟨by {
intros x y,
apply quotient.lift_on₂' x y (λ x' y', mk ⁅x', y'⁆),
intros x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ h₁ h₂,
apply (submodule.quotient.eq I.to_submodule).2,
have h : ⁅x₁, x₂⁆ - ⁅y₁, y₂⁆ = ⁅x₁, x₂ - y₂⁆ + ⁅x₁ - y₁, y₂⁆ := by simp [-lie_skew, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc],
rw h,
apply submodule.add_mem,
{ apply lie_mem_right R L I x₁ (x₂ - y₂) h₂, },
{ apply lie_mem_left R L I (x₁ - y₁) y₂ h₁, }, }⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_bracket (x y : L) :
(mk ⁅x, y⁆ : quotient I) = ⁅mk x, mk y⁆ := rfl
instance lie_quotient_lie_ring : lie_ring (quotient I) := {
add_lie := by { intros x' y' z', apply quotient.induction_on₃' x' y' z', intros x y z,
repeat { rw is_quotient_mk <|>
rw ←mk_bracket <|>
rw ←submodule.quotient.mk_add, },
apply congr_arg, apply add_lie, },
lie_add := by { intros x' y' z', apply quotient.induction_on₃' x' y' z', intros x y z,
repeat { rw is_quotient_mk <|>
rw ←mk_bracket <|>
rw ←submodule.quotient.mk_add, },
apply congr_arg, apply lie_add, },
lie_self := by { intros x', apply quotient.induction_on' x', intros x,
rw [is_quotient_mk, ←mk_bracket],
apply congr_arg, apply lie_self, },
jacobi := by { intros x' y' z', apply quotient.induction_on₃' x' y' z', intros x y z,
repeat { rw is_quotient_mk <|>
rw ←mk_bracket <|>
rw ←submodule.quotient.mk_add, },
apply congr_arg, apply lie_ring.jacobi, } }
instance lie_quotient_lie_algebra : lie_algebra R (quotient I) := {
lie_smul := by { intros t x' y', apply quotient.induction_on₂' x' y', intros x y,
repeat { rw is_quotient_mk <|>
rw ←mk_bracket <|>
rw ←submodule.quotient.mk_smul, },
apply congr_arg, apply lie_smul, } }
end quotient
end lie_submodule
section matrices
open_locale matrix
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
variables {n : Type w} [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
/-- An important class of Lie rings are those arising from the associative algebra structure on
square matrices over a commutative ring. -/
def matrix.lie_ring : lie_ring (matrix n n R) :=
lie_ring.of_associative_ring (matrix n n R)
local attribute [instance] matrix.lie_ring
/-- An important class of Lie algebras are those arising from the associative algebra structure on
square matrices over a commutative ring. -/
def matrix.lie_algebra : lie_algebra R (matrix n n R) :=
lie_algebra.of_associative_algebra (matrix n n R)
local attribute [instance] matrix.lie_algebra
/-- The natural equivalence between linear endomorphisms of finite free modules and square matrices
is compatible with the Lie algebra structures. -/
def lie_equiv_matrix' : module.End R (n → R) ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ matrix n n R :=
{ map_lie := λ T S,
begin
let f := @linear_map.to_matrixₗ n n _ _ R _ _,
change f (T.comp S - S.comp T) = (f T) * (f S) - (f S) * (f T),
have h : ∀ (T S : module.End R _), f (T.comp S) = (f T) ⬝ (f S) := matrix.comp_to_matrix_mul,
rw [linear_map.map_sub, h, h, matrix.mul_eq_mul, matrix.mul_eq_mul],
end,
..linear_equiv_matrix' }
end matrices
namespace bilin_form
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
section skew_adjoint_endomorphisms
variables {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables (B : bilin_form R M)
lemma is_skew_adjoint_bracket (f g : module.End R M)
(hf : f ∈ B.skew_adjoint_submodule) (hg : g ∈ B.skew_adjoint_submodule) :
⁅f, g⁆ ∈ B.skew_adjoint_submodule :=
begin
rw mem_skew_adjoint_submodule at *,
have hfg : is_adjoint_pair B B (f * g) (g * f), { rw ←neg_mul_neg g f, exact hf.mul hg, },
have hgf : is_adjoint_pair B B (g * f) (f * g), { rw ←neg_mul_neg f g, exact hg.mul hf, },
change bilin_form.is_adjoint_pair B B (f * g - g * f) (-(f * g - g * f)), rw neg_sub,
exact hfg.sub hgf,
end
/-- Given an `R`-module `M`, equipped with a bilinear form, the skew-adjoint endomorphisms form a
Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra of endomorphisms. -/
def skew_adjoint_lie_subalgebra : lie_subalgebra R (module.End R M) :=
{ lie_mem := B.is_skew_adjoint_bracket, ..B.skew_adjoint_submodule }
end skew_adjoint_endomorphisms
section skew_adjoint_matrices
variables {n : Type w} [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
variables (J : matrix n n R)
local attribute [instance] matrix.lie_ring
local attribute [instance] matrix.lie_algebra
/-- Given a square matrix `J` defining a bilinear form on the free module, there is a natural
embedding from the corresponding Lie subalgebra of skew-adjoint endomorphisms into the Lie algebra
of matrices. -/
def skew_adjoint_matrices_lie_embedding :
J.to_bilin_form.skew_adjoint_lie_subalgebra →ₗ⁅R⁆ matrix n n R :=
lie_algebra.morphism.comp (lie_algebra.equiv.to_morphism lie_equiv_matrix')
(skew_adjoint_lie_subalgebra J.to_bilin_form).incl
/-- The Lie subalgebra of skew-adjoint square matrices corresponding to a square matrix `J`. -/
def skew_adjoint_matrices_lie_subalgebra : lie_subalgebra R (matrix n n R) :=
(skew_adjoint_matrices_lie_embedding J).range
end skew_adjoint_matrices
end bilin_form
|
d0f3882a5b40dc98180d6e6a4e964adda47e6a78 | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/topology/separation.lean | 6479746274c4373da085a12af55cc22978231622 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,398 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Separation properties of topological spaces.
-/
import topology.subset_properties
open set filter
open_locale topological_space
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable -- TODO: use "open_locale classical"
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [topological_space α]
section separation
/-- A T₀ space, also known as a Kolmogorov space, is a topological space
where for every pair `x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing one but not the other. -/
class t0_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(t0 : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → ∃ U:set α, is_open U ∧ (xor (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U)))
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_open_finset [t0_space α] (s : finset α) (sne : s.nonempty)
(hso : is_open (↑s : set α)) :
∃ x ∈ s, is_open ({x} : set α):=
begin
induction s using finset.strong_induction_on with s ihs,
by_cases hs : set.subsingleton (↑s : set α),
{ rcases sne with ⟨x, hx⟩,
refine ⟨x, hx, _⟩,
have : (↑s : set α) = {x}, from hs.eq_singleton_of_mem hx,
rwa this at hso },
{ dunfold set.subsingleton at hs,
push_neg at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩,
rcases t0_space.t0 x y hxy with ⟨U, hU, hxyU⟩,
wlog H : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U := hxyU using [x y, y x],
obtain ⟨z, hzs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s.filter (λ z, z ∈ U), is_open ({z} : set α),
{ refine ihs _ (finset.filter_ssubset.2 ⟨y, hy, H.2⟩) ⟨x, finset.mem_filter.2 ⟨hx, H.1⟩⟩ _,
rw [finset.coe_filter],
exact is_open_inter hso hU },
exact ⟨z, (finset.mem_filter.1 hzs).1, hz⟩ }
end
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_fintype [t0_space α] [f : fintype α] [ha : nonempty α] :
∃ x:α, is_open ({x}:set α) :=
begin
refine ha.elim (λ x, _),
have : is_open (↑(finset.univ : finset α) : set α), { simp },
rcases exists_open_singleton_of_open_finset _ ⟨x, finset.mem_univ x⟩ this with ⟨x, _, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
end
instance subtype.t0_space [t0_space α] {p : α → Prop} : t0_space (subtype p) :=
⟨λ x y hxy, let ⟨U, hU, hxyU⟩ := t0_space.t0 (x:α) y ((not_congr subtype.coe_ext).1 hxy) in
⟨(coe : subtype p → α) ⁻¹' U, is_open_induced hU, hxyU⟩⟩
/-- A T₁ space, also known as a Fréchet space, is a topological space
where every singleton set is closed. Equivalently, for every pair
`x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing `x` and not `y`. -/
class t1_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(t1 : ∀x, is_closed ({x} : set α))
lemma is_closed_singleton [t1_space α] {x : α} : is_closed ({x} : set α) :=
t1_space.t1 x
lemma is_open_ne [t1_space α] {x : α} : is_open {y | y ≠ x} :=
compl_singleton_eq x ▸ is_open_compl_iff.2 (t1_space.t1 x)
instance subtype.t1_space {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [t1_space α] {p : α → Prop} :
t1_space (subtype p) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, is_closed_induced_iff.2 $ ⟨{x}, is_closed_singleton, set.ext $ λ y,
by simp [subtype.coe_ext]⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance t1_space.t0_space [t1_space α] : t0_space α :=
⟨λ x y h, ⟨{z | z ≠ y}, is_open_ne, or.inl ⟨h, not_not_intro rfl⟩⟩⟩
lemma compl_singleton_mem_nhds [t1_space α] {x y : α} (h : y ≠ x) : - {x} ∈ 𝓝 y :=
mem_nhds_sets is_closed_singleton $ by rwa [mem_compl_eq, mem_singleton_iff]
@[simp] lemma closure_singleton [t1_space α] {a : α} :
closure ({a} : set α) = {a} :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_singleton
/-- A T₂ space, also known as a Hausdorff space, is one in which for every
`x ≠ y` there exists disjoint open sets around `x` and `y`. This is
the most widely used of the separation axioms. -/
class t2_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(t2 : ∀x y, x ≠ y → ∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅)
lemma t2_separation [t2_space α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅ :=
t2_space.t2 x y h
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance t2_space.t1_space [t2_space α] : t1_space α :=
⟨λ x, is_open_iff_forall_mem_open.2 $ λ y hxy,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hyu, hxv, huv⟩ := t2_separation (mt mem_singleton_of_eq hxy) in
⟨u, λ z hz1 hz2, (ext_iff.1 huv x).1 ⟨mem_singleton_iff.1 hz2 ▸ hz1, hxv⟩, hu, hyu⟩⟩
lemma eq_of_nhds_ne_bot [ht : t2_space α] {x y : α} (h : 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y ≠ ⊥) : x = y :=
classical.by_contradiction $ assume : x ≠ y,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hx, hy, huv⟩ := t2_space.t2 x y this in
absurd huv $ (inf_ne_bot_iff.1 h (mem_nhds_sets hu hx) (mem_nhds_sets hv hy)).ne_empty
lemma t2_iff_nhds : t2_space α ↔ ∀ {x y : α}, 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y ≠ ⊥ → x = y :=
⟨assume h, by exactI λ x y, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot,
assume h, ⟨assume x y xy,
have 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y = ⊥ := classical.by_contradiction (mt h xy),
let ⟨u', hu', v', hv', u'v'⟩ := empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mpr this,
⟨u, uu', uo, hu⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hu',
⟨v, vv', vo, hv⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hv' in
⟨u, v, uo, vo, hu, hv, disjoint.eq_bot $ disjoint.mono uu' vv' u'v'⟩⟩⟩
lemma t2_iff_ultrafilter :
t2_space α ↔ ∀ f {x y : α}, is_ultrafilter f → f ≤ 𝓝 x → f ≤ 𝓝 y → x = y :=
t2_iff_nhds.trans
⟨assume h f x y u fx fy, h $ ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot u.1 (le_inf fx fy),
assume h x y xy,
let ⟨f, hf, uf⟩ := exists_ultrafilter xy in
h f uf (le_trans hf inf_le_left) (le_trans hf inf_le_right)⟩
@[simp] lemma nhds_eq_nhds_iff {a b : α} [t2_space α] : 𝓝 a = 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨assume h, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ by rw [h, inf_idem]; exact nhds_ne_bot, assume h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma nhds_le_nhds_iff {a b : α} [t2_space α] : 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨assume h, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ by rw [inf_of_le_left h]; exact nhds_ne_bot, assume h, h ▸ le_refl _⟩
lemma tendsto_nhds_unique [t2_space α] {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {a b : α}
(hl : l ≠ ⊥) (ha : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : a = b :=
eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (map_ne_bot hl) $ le_inf ha hb
section lim
variables [t2_space α] {f : filter α}
/-!
### Properties of `Lim` and `lim`
In this section we use explicit `nonempty α` instances for `Lim` and `lim`. This way the lemmas
are useful without a `nonempty α` instance.
-/
lemma Lim_eq {a : α} (hf : f ≠ ⊥) (h : f ≤ 𝓝 a) :
@Lim _ _ ⟨a⟩ f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique hf (Lim_spec ⟨a, h⟩) h
lemma filter.tendsto.lim_eq {a : α} {f : filter β} {g : β → α} (h : tendsto g f (𝓝 a))
(hf : f ≠ ⊥) :
@lim _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ f g = a :=
Lim_eq (map_ne_bot hf) h
lemma continuous.lim_eq [topological_space β] {f : β → α} (h : continuous f) (a : β) :
@lim _ _ _ ⟨f a⟩ (𝓝 a) f = f a :=
(h.tendsto a).lim_eq nhds_ne_bot
@[simp] lemma Lim_nhds (a : α) : @Lim _ _ ⟨a⟩ (𝓝 a) = a :=
Lim_eq nhds_ne_bot (le_refl _)
@[simp] lemma lim_nhds_id (a : α) : @lim _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ (𝓝 a) id = a :=
Lim_nhds a
@[simp] lemma Lim_nhds_within {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ closure s) :
@Lim _ _ ⟨a⟩ (nhds_within a s) = a :=
Lim_eq begin rw [closure_eq_nhds] at h, exact h end inf_le_left
@[simp] lemma lim_nhds_within_id {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ closure s) :
@lim _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ (nhds_within a s) id = a :=
Lim_nhds_within h
end lim
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance t2_space_discrete {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] : t2_space α :=
{ t2 := assume x y hxy, ⟨{x}, {y}, is_open_discrete _, is_open_discrete _, rfl, rfl,
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ by intros z hz;
cases eq_of_mem_singleton hz.1; cases eq_of_mem_singleton hz.2; cc⟩ }
private lemma separated_by_f {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
[tα : topological_space α] [tβ : topological_space β] [t2_space β]
(f : α → β) (hf : tα ≤ tβ.induced f) {x y : α} (h : f x ≠ f y) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅ :=
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, xu, yv, uv⟩ := t2_separation h in
⟨f ⁻¹' u, f ⁻¹' v, hf _ ⟨u, uo, rfl⟩, hf _ ⟨v, vo, rfl⟩, xu, yv,
by rw [←preimage_inter, uv, preimage_empty]⟩
instance {α : Type*} {p : α → Prop} [t : topological_space α] [t2_space α] : t2_space (subtype p) :=
⟨assume x y h,
separated_by_f subtype.val (le_refl _) (mt subtype.eq h)⟩
instance {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [t₁ : topological_space α] [t2_space α]
[t₂ : topological_space β] [t2_space β] : t2_space (α × β) :=
⟨assume ⟨x₁,x₂⟩ ⟨y₁,y₂⟩ h,
or.elim (not_and_distrib.mp (mt prod.ext_iff.mpr h))
(λ h₁, separated_by_f prod.fst inf_le_left h₁)
(λ h₂, separated_by_f prod.snd inf_le_right h₂)⟩
instance Pi.t2_space {α : Type*} {β : α → Type v} [t₂ : Πa, topological_space (β a)] [Πa, t2_space (β a)] :
t2_space (Πa, β a) :=
⟨assume x y h,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := not_forall.mp (mt funext h) in
separated_by_f (λz, z i) (infi_le _ i) hi⟩
lemma is_closed_diagonal [t2_space α] : is_closed {p:α×α | p.1 = p.2} :=
is_closed_iff_nhds.mpr $ assume ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ h, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ assume : 𝓝 a₁ ⊓ 𝓝 a₂ = ⊥, h $
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, (h' : t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ ∅)⟩ :=
by rw [←empty_in_sets_eq_bot, mem_inf_sets] at this; exact this in
begin
change t₁ ∈ 𝓝 a₁ at ht₁,
change t₂ ∈ 𝓝 a₂ at ht₂,
rw [nhds_prod_eq, ←empty_in_sets_eq_bot],
apply filter.sets_of_superset,
apply inter_mem_inf_sets (prod_mem_prod ht₁ ht₂) (mem_principal_sets.mpr (subset.refl _)),
exact assume ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, (heq : x₁ = x₂)⟩,
show false, from @h' x₁ ⟨hx₁, heq.symm ▸ hx₂⟩
end
variables [topological_space β]
lemma is_closed_eq [t2_space α] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : is_closed {x:β | f x = g x} :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mp (hf.prod_mk hg) _ is_closed_diagonal
lemma diagonal_eq_range_diagonal_map {α : Type*} : {p:α×α | p.1 = p.2} = range (λx, (x,x)) :=
ext $ assume p, iff.intro
(assume h, ⟨p.1, prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩)
(assume ⟨x, hx⟩, show p.1 = p.2, by rw ←hx)
lemma prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint {α : Type*} {s t : set α} :
set.prod s t ⊆ - {p:α×α | p.1 = p.2} ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
by rw [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, subset_compl_comm,
diagonal_eq_range_diagonal_map, range_subset_iff]; simp
lemma compact_compact_separated [t2_space α] {s t : set α}
(hs : compact s) (ht : compact t) (hst : s ∩ t = ∅) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅ :=
by simp only [prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint.symm] at ⊢ hst;
exact generalized_tube_lemma hs ht is_closed_diagonal hst
lemma closed_of_compact [t2_space α] (s : set α) (hs : compact s) : is_closed s :=
is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ is_open_iff_forall_mem_open.mpr $ assume x hx,
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, su, xv, uv⟩ :=
compact_compact_separated hs (compact_singleton : compact {x})
(by rwa [inter_comm, ←subset_compl_iff_disjoint, singleton_subset_iff]) in
have v ⊆ -s, from
subset_compl_comm.mp (subset.trans su (subset_compl_iff_disjoint.mpr uv)),
⟨v, this, vo, by simpa using xv⟩
lemma locally_compact_of_compact_nhds [t2_space α] (h : ∀ x : α, ∃ s, s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ compact s) :
locally_compact_space α :=
⟨assume x n hn,
let ⟨u, un, uo, xu⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hn in
let ⟨k, kx, kc⟩ := h x in
-- K is compact but not necessarily contained in N.
-- K \ U is again compact and doesn't contain x, so
-- we may find open sets V, W separating x from K \ U.
-- Then K \ W is a compact neighborhood of x contained in U.
let ⟨v, w, vo, wo, xv, kuw, vw⟩ :=
compact_compact_separated compact_singleton (compact_diff kc uo)
(by rw [singleton_inter_eq_empty]; exact λ h, h.2 xu) in
have wn : -w ∈ 𝓝 x, from
mem_nhds_sets_iff.mpr
⟨v, subset_compl_iff_disjoint.mpr vw, vo, singleton_subset_iff.mp xv⟩,
⟨k - w,
filter.inter_mem_sets kx wn,
subset.trans (diff_subset_comm.mp kuw) un,
compact_diff kc wo⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance locally_compact_of_compact [t2_space α] [compact_space α] : locally_compact_space α :=
locally_compact_of_compact_nhds (assume x, ⟨univ, mem_nhds_sets is_open_univ trivial, compact_univ⟩)
end separation
section regularity
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A T₃ space, also known as a regular space (although this condition sometimes
omits T₂), is one in which for every closed `C` and `x ∉ C`, there exist
disjoint open sets containing `x` and `C` respectively. -/
class regular_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] extends t1_space α : Prop :=
(regular : ∀{s:set α} {a}, is_closed s → a ∉ s → ∃t, is_open t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ 𝓝 a ⊓ principal t = ⊥)
end prio
lemma nhds_is_closed [regular_space α] {a : α} {s : set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
∃t∈(𝓝 a), t ⊆ s ∧ is_closed t :=
let ⟨s', h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp h in
have ∃t, is_open t ∧ -s' ⊆ t ∧ 𝓝 a ⊓ principal t = ⊥,
from regular_space.regular (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr h₂) (not_not_intro h₃),
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂, ht₃⟩ := this in
⟨-t,
mem_sets_of_eq_bot $ by rwa [compl_compl],
subset.trans (compl_subset_comm.1 ht₂) h₁,
is_closed_compl_iff.mpr ht₁⟩
instance subtype.regular_space [regular_space α] {p : α → Prop} : regular_space (subtype p) :=
⟨begin
intros s a hs ha,
rcases is_closed_induced_iff.1 hs with ⟨s, hs', rfl⟩,
rcases regular_space.regular hs' ha with ⟨t, ht, hst, hat⟩,
refine ⟨coe ⁻¹' t, is_open_induced ht, preimage_mono hst, _⟩,
rw [nhds_induced, ← comap_principal, ← comap_inf, hat, comap_bot]
end⟩
variable (α)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance regular_space.t2_space [regular_space α] : t2_space α :=
⟨λ x y hxy,
let ⟨s, hs, hys, hxs⟩ := regular_space.regular is_closed_singleton
(mt mem_singleton_iff.1 hxy),
⟨t, hxt, u, hsu, htu⟩ := empty_in_sets_eq_bot.2 hxs,
⟨v, hvt, hv, hxv⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.1 hxt in
⟨v, s, hv, hs, hxv, singleton_subset_iff.1 hys,
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ λ z ⟨hzv, hzs⟩, htu ⟨hvt hzv, hsu hzs⟩⟩⟩
end regularity
section normality
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A T₄ space, also known as a normal space (although this condition sometimes
omits T₂), is one in which for every pair of disjoint closed sets `C` and `D`,
there exist disjoint open sets containing `C` and `D` respectively. -/
class normal_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] extends t1_space α : Prop :=
(normal : ∀ s t : set α, is_closed s → is_closed t → disjoint s t →
∃ u v, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ disjoint u v)
end prio
theorem normal_separation [normal_space α] (s t : set α)
(H1 : is_closed s) (H2 : is_closed t) (H3 : disjoint s t) :
∃ u v, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ disjoint u v :=
normal_space.normal s t H1 H2 H3
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normal_space.regular_space [normal_space α] : regular_space α :=
{ regular := λ s x hs hxs, let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hsu, hxv, huv⟩ := normal_separation s {x} hs is_closed_singleton
(λ _ ⟨hx, hy⟩, hxs $ set.mem_of_eq_of_mem (set.eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm hx) in
⟨u, hu, hsu, filter.empty_in_sets_eq_bot.1 $ filter.mem_inf_sets.2
⟨v, mem_nhds_sets hv (set.singleton_subset_iff.1 hxv), u, filter.mem_principal_self u, set.inter_comm u v ▸ huv⟩⟩ }
-- We can't make this an instance because it could cause an instance loop.
lemma normal_of_compact_t2 [compact_space α] [t2_space α] : normal_space α :=
begin
refine ⟨assume s t hs ht st, _⟩,
simp only [disjoint_iff],
exact compact_compact_separated hs.compact ht.compact st.eq_bot
end
end normality
|
6b46a2a0a6d42b1facf916b759565a3ff91fbdae | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/algebra/ordered_group.lean | 1997c68553bc59c1d267345dccfc8b14947d313e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 39,709 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
Partially ordered additive groups, modeled on Isabelle's library. These classes can be refined
if necessary.
-/
import algebra.group algebra.order algebra.monotone
open eq
variables {A B : Type}
/- partially ordered monoids, such as the natural numbers -/
structure ordered_cancel_comm_monoid [class] (A : Type) extends add_comm_monoid A,
add_left_cancel_semigroup A, add_right_cancel_semigroup A, order_pair A :=
(add_le_add_left : ∀a b, le a b → ∀c, le (add c a) (add c b))
(le_of_add_le_add_left : ∀a b c, le (add a b) (add a c) → le b c)
(add_lt_add_left : ∀a b, lt a b → ∀c, lt (add c a) (add c b))
(lt_of_add_lt_add_left : ∀a b c, lt (add a b) (add a c) → lt b c)
section
variables [ordered_cancel_comm_monoid A]
variables {a b c d e : A}
theorem add_lt_add_left (H : a < b) (c : A) : c + a < c + b :=
ordered_cancel_comm_monoid.add_lt_add_left a b H c
theorem add_lt_add_right (H : a < b) (c : A) : a + c < b + c :=
sorry
/-
begin
rewrite [add.comm, {b + _}add.comm],
exact (add_lt_add_left H c)
end
-/
theorem add_le_add_left (H : a ≤ b) (c : A) : c + a ≤ c + b :=
ordered_cancel_comm_monoid.add_le_add_left a b H c
theorem add_le_add_right (H : a ≤ b) (c : A) : a + c ≤ b + c :=
(add.comm c a) ▸ (add.comm c b) ▸ (add_le_add_left H c)
theorem add_le_add (Hab : a ≤ b) (Hcd : c ≤ d) : a + c ≤ b + d :=
le.trans (add_le_add_right Hab c) (add_le_add_left Hcd b)
theorem le_add_of_nonneg_right (H : b ≥ 0) : a ≤ a + b :=
sorry
/-
begin
have H1 : a + b ≥ a + 0, from add_le_add_left H a,
rewrite add_zero at H1,
exact H1
end
-/
theorem le_add_of_nonneg_left (H : b ≥ 0) : a ≤ b + a :=
sorry
/-
begin
have H1 : 0 + a ≤ b + a, from add_le_add_right H a,
rewrite zero_add at H1,
exact H1
end
-/
theorem add_lt_add (Hab : a < b) (Hcd : c < d) : a + c < b + d :=
lt.trans (add_lt_add_right Hab c) (add_lt_add_left Hcd b)
theorem add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (Hab : a ≤ b) (Hcd : c < d) : a + c < b + d :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right Hab c) (add_lt_add_left Hcd b)
theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (Hab : a < b) (Hcd : c ≤ d) : a + c < b + d :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add_right Hab c) (add_le_add_left Hcd b)
theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (H : b > 0) : a < a + b := add_zero a ▸ add_lt_add_left H a
theorem lt_add_of_pos_left (H : b > 0) : a < b + a := zero_add a ▸ add_lt_add_right H a
-- here we start using le_of_add_le_add_left.
theorem le_of_add_le_add_left (H : a + b ≤ a + c) : b ≤ c :=
ordered_cancel_comm_monoid.le_of_add_le_add_left a b c H
theorem le_of_add_le_add_right (H : a + b ≤ c + b) : a ≤ c :=
sorry -- le_of_add_le_add_left (show b + a ≤ b + c, begin rewrite [add.comm, {b + _}add.comm], exact H end)
theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_left (H : a + b < a + c) : b < c :=
ordered_cancel_comm_monoid.lt_of_add_lt_add_left a b c H
theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right (H : a + b < c + b) : a < c :=
lt_of_add_lt_add_left ((add.comm a b) ▸ (add.comm c b) ▸ H)
theorem add_le_add_left_iff (a b c : A) : a + b ≤ a + c ↔ b ≤ c :=
iff.intro le_of_add_le_add_left (assume H, add_le_add_left H _)
theorem add_le_add_right_iff (a b c : A) : a + b ≤ c + b ↔ a ≤ c :=
iff.intro le_of_add_le_add_right (assume H, add_le_add_right H _)
theorem add_lt_add_left_iff (a b c : A) : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c :=
iff.intro lt_of_add_lt_add_left (assume H, add_lt_add_left H _)
theorem add_lt_add_right_iff (a b c : A) : a + b < c + b ↔ a < c :=
iff.intro lt_of_add_lt_add_right (assume H, add_lt_add_right H _)
-- here we start using properties of zero.
theorem add_nonneg (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a + b :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_le_add Ha Hb)
theorem add_pos (Ha : 0 < a) (Hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_lt_add Ha Hb)
theorem add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (Ha : 0 < a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 < a + b :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le Ha Hb)
theorem add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt Ha Hb)
theorem add_nonpos (Ha : a ≤ 0) (Hb : b ≤ 0) : a + b ≤ 0 :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_le_add Ha Hb)
theorem add_neg (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_lt_add Ha Hb)
theorem add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : b ≤ 0) : a + b < 0 :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le Ha Hb)
theorem add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg (Ha : a ≤ 0) (Hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
zero_add 0 ▸ (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt Ha Hb)
-- TODO: add nonpos version (will be easier with simplifier)
theorem add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_and_eq_zero_of_nonneg_of_nonneg
(Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
sorry
/-
iff.intro
(assume Hab : a + b = 0,
have Ha' : a ≤ 0, from
calc
a = a + 0 : by rewrite add_zero
... ≤ a + b : add_le_add_left Hb _
... = 0 : Hab,
have Haz : a = 0, from le.antisymm Ha' Ha,
have Hb' : b ≤ 0, from
calc
b = 0 + b : by rewrite zero_add
... ≤ a + b : by exact add_le_add_right Ha _
... = 0 : Hab,
have Hbz : b = 0, from le.antisymm Hb' Hb,
and.intro Haz Hbz)
(assume Hab : a = 0 ∧ b = 0,
obtain Ha' Hb', from Hab,
by rewrite [Ha', Hb', add_zero])
-/
theorem le_add_of_nonneg_of_le (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hbc : b ≤ c) : b ≤ a + c :=
zero_add b ▸ add_le_add Ha Hbc
theorem le_add_of_le_of_nonneg (Hbc : b ≤ c) (Ha : 0 ≤ a) : b ≤ c + a :=
add_zero b ▸ add_le_add Hbc Ha
theorem lt_add_of_pos_of_le (Ha : 0 < a) (Hbc : b ≤ c) : b < a + c :=
zero_add b ▸ add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le Ha Hbc
theorem lt_add_of_le_of_pos (Hbc : b ≤ c) (Ha : 0 < a) : b < c + a :=
add_zero b ▸ add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt Hbc Ha
theorem add_le_of_nonpos_of_le (Ha : a ≤ 0) (Hbc : b ≤ c) : a + b ≤ c :=
zero_add c ▸ add_le_add Ha Hbc
theorem add_le_of_le_of_nonpos (Hbc : b ≤ c) (Ha : a ≤ 0) : b + a ≤ c :=
add_zero c ▸ add_le_add Hbc Ha
theorem add_lt_of_neg_of_le (Ha : a < 0) (Hbc : b ≤ c) : a + b < c :=
zero_add c ▸ add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le Ha Hbc
theorem add_lt_of_le_of_neg (Hbc : b ≤ c) (Ha : a < 0) : b + a < c :=
add_zero c ▸ add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt Hbc Ha
theorem lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hbc : b < c) : b < a + c :=
zero_add b ▸ add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt Ha Hbc
theorem lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg (Hbc : b < c) (Ha : 0 ≤ a) : b < c + a :=
add_zero b ▸ add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le Hbc Ha
theorem lt_add_of_pos_of_lt (Ha : 0 < a) (Hbc : b < c) : b < a + c :=
zero_add b ▸ add_lt_add Ha Hbc
theorem lt_add_of_lt_of_pos (Hbc : b < c) (Ha : 0 < a) : b < c + a :=
add_zero b ▸ add_lt_add Hbc Ha
theorem add_lt_of_nonpos_of_lt (Ha : a ≤ 0) (Hbc : b < c) : a + b < c :=
zero_add c ▸ add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt Ha Hbc
theorem add_lt_of_lt_of_nonpos (Hbc : b < c) (Ha : a ≤ 0) : b + a < c :=
add_zero c ▸ add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le Hbc Ha
theorem add_lt_of_neg_of_lt (Ha : a < 0) (Hbc : b < c) : a + b < c :=
zero_add c ▸ add_lt_add Ha Hbc
theorem add_lt_of_lt_of_neg (Hbc : b < c) (Ha : a < 0) : b + a < c :=
add_zero c ▸ add_lt_add Hbc Ha
theorem strictly_increasing_add_left (c : A) : strictly_increasing (λ x, x + c) :=
take x₁ x₂, assume H, add_lt_add_right H c
theorem strictly_increasing_add_right (c : A) : strictly_increasing (λ x, c + x) :=
take x₁ x₂, assume H, add_lt_add_left H c
theorem nondecreasing_add_left (c : A) : nondecreasing (λ x, x + c) :=
take x₁ x₂, assume H, add_le_add_right H c
theorem nondecreasing_add_right (c : A) : nondecreasing (λ x, c + x) :=
take x₁ x₂, assume H, add_le_add_left H c
end
/- ordered cancelative commutative monoids with a decidable linear order -/
structure decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid [class] (A : Type)
extends ordered_cancel_comm_monoid A, decidable_linear_order A
section
variables [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid A]
variables {a b c d e : A}
theorem min_add_add_left : min (a + b) (a + c) = a + min b c :=
sorry
/-
eq.symm (eq_min
(show a + min b c ≤ a + b, from add_le_add_left !min_le_left _)
(show a + min b c ≤ a + c, from add_le_add_left !min_le_right _)
(take d,
assume H₁ : d ≤ a + b,
assume H₂ : d ≤ a + c,
decidable.by_cases
(suppose b ≤ c, using this, by rewrite [min_eq_left this]; apply H₁)
(suppose ¬ b ≤ c, using this,
by rewrite [min_eq_right (le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge this))]; apply H₂)))
-/
theorem min_add_add_right : min (a + c) (b + c) = min a b + c :=
sorry -- by rewrite [add.comm a c, add.comm b c, add.comm _ c]; apply min_add_add_left
theorem max_add_add_left : max (a + b) (a + c) = a + max b c :=
sorry
/-
eq.symm (eq_max
(add_le_add_left !le_max_left _)
(add_le_add_left !le_max_right _)
(take d,
assume H₁ : a + b ≤ d,
assume H₂ : a + c ≤ d,
decidable.by_cases
(suppose b ≤ c, using this, by rewrite [max_eq_right this]; apply H₂)
(suppose ¬ b ≤ c, using this,
by rewrite [max_eq_left (le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge this))]; apply H₁)))
-/
theorem max_add_add_right : max (a + c) (b + c) = max a b + c :=
sorry -- by rewrite [add.comm a c, add.comm b c, add.comm _ c]; apply max_add_add_left
end
/- partially ordered groups -/
structure ordered_comm_group [class] (A : Type) extends add_comm_group A, order_pair A :=
(add_le_add_left : ∀a b, le a b → ∀c, le (add c a) (add c b))
(add_lt_add_left : ∀a b, lt a b → ∀ c, lt (add c a) (add c b))
theorem ordered_comm_group.le_of_add_le_add_left [ordered_comm_group A] {a b c : A}
(H : a + b ≤ a + c) : b ≤ c :=
have H' : -a + (a + b) ≤ -a + (a + c), from ordered_comm_group.add_le_add_left _ _ H _,
sorry -- by rewrite *neg_add_cancel_left at H'; exact H'
theorem ordered_comm_group.lt_of_add_lt_add_left [ordered_comm_group A] {a b c : A}
(H : a + b < a + c) : b < c :=
have H' : -a + (a + b) < -a + (a + c), from ordered_comm_group.add_lt_add_left _ _ H _,
sorry -- by rewrite *neg_add_cancel_left at H'; exact H'
attribute [instance]
definition ordered_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid [s : ordered_comm_group A] : ordered_cancel_comm_monoid A :=
⦃ ordered_cancel_comm_monoid, s,
add_left_cancel := @add.left_cancel A _,
add_right_cancel := @add.right_cancel A _,
le_of_add_le_add_left := @ordered_comm_group.le_of_add_le_add_left A _,
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := @ordered_comm_group.lt_of_add_lt_add_left A _⦄
section
variables [ordered_comm_group A] (a b c d e : A)
theorem neg_le_neg {a b : A} (H : a ≤ b) : -b ≤ -a :=
have H1 : 0 ≤ -a + b, from add.left_inv a ▸ add_le_add_left H (-a),
add_neg_cancel_right (-a) b ▸ zero_add (-b) ▸ add_le_add_right H1 (-b)
theorem le_of_neg_le_neg {a b : A} (H : -b ≤ -a) : a ≤ b :=
neg_neg a ▸ neg_neg b ▸ neg_le_neg H
theorem neg_le_neg_iff_le : -a ≤ -b ↔ b ≤ a :=
iff.intro le_of_neg_le_neg neg_le_neg
theorem nonneg_of_neg_nonpos {a : A} (H : -a ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a :=
le_of_neg_le_neg (symm neg_zero ▸ H)
theorem neg_nonpos_of_nonneg {a : A} (H : 0 ≤ a) : -a ≤ 0 :=
neg_zero ▸ neg_le_neg H
theorem neg_nonpos_iff_nonneg : -a ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
iff.intro nonneg_of_neg_nonpos neg_nonpos_of_nonneg
theorem nonpos_of_neg_nonneg {a : A} (H : 0 ≤ -a) : a ≤ 0 :=
le_of_neg_le_neg (symm neg_zero ▸ H)
theorem neg_nonneg_of_nonpos {a : A} (H : a ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ -a :=
neg_zero ▸ neg_le_neg H
theorem neg_nonneg_iff_nonpos : 0 ≤ -a ↔ a ≤ 0 :=
iff.intro nonpos_of_neg_nonneg neg_nonneg_of_nonpos
theorem neg_lt_neg {a b : A} (H : a < b) : -b < -a :=
have H1 : 0 < -a + b, from add.left_inv a ▸ add_lt_add_left H (-a),
add_neg_cancel_right (-a) b ▸ zero_add (-b) ▸ add_lt_add_right H1 (-b)
theorem lt_of_neg_lt_neg {a b : A} (H : -b < -a) : a < b :=
neg_neg a ▸ neg_neg b ▸ neg_lt_neg H
theorem neg_lt_neg_iff_lt : -a < -b ↔ b < a :=
iff.intro lt_of_neg_lt_neg neg_lt_neg
theorem pos_of_neg_neg {a : A} (H : -a < 0) : 0 < a :=
lt_of_neg_lt_neg (symm neg_zero ▸ H)
theorem neg_neg_of_pos {a : A} (H : 0 < a) : -a < 0 :=
neg_zero ▸ neg_lt_neg H
theorem neg_neg_iff_pos : -a < 0 ↔ 0 < a :=
iff.intro pos_of_neg_neg neg_neg_of_pos
theorem neg_of_neg_pos {a : A} (H : 0 < -a) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_neg_lt_neg (symm neg_zero ▸ H)
theorem neg_pos_of_neg {a : A} (H : a < 0) : 0 < -a :=
neg_zero ▸ neg_lt_neg H
theorem neg_pos_iff_neg : 0 < -a ↔ a < 0 :=
iff.intro neg_of_neg_pos neg_pos_of_neg
theorem le_neg_iff_le_neg : a ≤ -b ↔ b ≤ -a := neg_neg a ▸ neg_le_neg_iff_le (-a) b
theorem le_neg_of_le_neg {a b : A} : a ≤ -b → b ≤ -a := iff.mp (le_neg_iff_le_neg a b)
theorem neg_le_iff_neg_le : -a ≤ b ↔ -b ≤ a := neg_neg b ▸ neg_le_neg_iff_le a (-b)
theorem neg_le_of_neg_le {a b : A} : -a ≤ b → -b ≤ a := iff.mp (neg_le_iff_neg_le a b)
theorem lt_neg_iff_lt_neg : a < -b ↔ b < -a := neg_neg a ▸ neg_lt_neg_iff_lt (-a) b
theorem lt_neg_of_lt_neg {a b : A} : a < -b → b < -a := iff.mp (lt_neg_iff_lt_neg a b)
theorem neg_lt_iff_neg_lt : -a < b ↔ -b < a := neg_neg b ▸ neg_lt_neg_iff_lt a (-b)
theorem neg_lt_of_neg_lt {a b : A} : -a < b → -b < a := iff.mp (neg_lt_iff_neg_lt a b)
theorem sub_nonneg_iff_le : 0 ≤ a - b ↔ b ≤ a := sub_self b ▸ add_le_add_right_iff b (-b) a
theorem sub_nonneg_of_le {a b : A} : b ≤ a → 0 ≤ a - b := iff.mpr (sub_nonneg_iff_le a b)
theorem le_of_sub_nonneg {a b : A} : 0 ≤ a - b → b ≤ a := iff.mp (sub_nonneg_iff_le a b)
theorem sub_nonpos_iff_le : a - b ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ b := sub_self b ▸ add_le_add_right_iff a (-b) b
theorem sub_nonpos_of_le {a b : A} : a ≤ b → a - b ≤ 0 := iff.mpr (sub_nonpos_iff_le a b)
theorem le_of_sub_nonpos {a b : A} : a - b ≤ 0 → a ≤ b := iff.mp (sub_nonpos_iff_le a b)
theorem sub_pos_iff_lt : 0 < a - b ↔ b < a := sub_self b ▸ add_lt_add_right_iff b (-b) a
theorem sub_pos_of_lt {a b : A} : b < a → 0 < a - b := iff.mpr (sub_pos_iff_lt a b)
theorem lt_of_sub_pos {a b : A} : 0 < a - b → b < a := iff.mp (sub_pos_iff_lt a b)
theorem sub_neg_iff_lt : a - b < 0 ↔ a < b := sub_self b ▸ add_lt_add_right_iff a (-b) b
theorem sub_neg_of_lt {a b : A} : a < b → a - b < 0 := iff.mpr (sub_neg_iff_lt a b)
theorem lt_of_sub_neg {a b : A} : a - b < 0 → a < b := iff.mp (sub_neg_iff_lt a b)
theorem add_le_iff_le_neg_add : a + b ≤ c ↔ b ≤ -a + c :=
have H: a + b ≤ c ↔ -a + (a + b) ≤ -a + c, from iff.symm (add_le_add_left_iff (-a) (a + b) c),
neg_add_cancel_left a b ▸ H
theorem add_le_of_le_neg_add {a b c : A} : b ≤ -a + c → a + b ≤ c :=
iff.mpr (add_le_iff_le_neg_add a b c)
theorem le_neg_add_of_add_le {a b c : A} : a + b ≤ c → b ≤ -a + c :=
iff.mp (add_le_iff_le_neg_add a b c)
theorem add_le_iff_le_sub_left : a + b ≤ c ↔ b ≤ c - a :=
sorry -- by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg, {c+_}add.comm]; apply add_le_iff_le_neg_add
theorem add_le_of_le_sub_left {a b c : A} : b ≤ c - a → a + b ≤ c :=
iff.mpr (add_le_iff_le_sub_left a b c)
theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le {a b c : A} : a + b ≤ c → b ≤ c - a :=
iff.mp (add_le_iff_le_sub_left a b c)
theorem add_le_iff_le_sub_right : a + b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c - b :=
have H: a + b ≤ c ↔ a + b - b ≤ c - b, from iff.symm (add_le_add_right_iff (a + b) (-b) c),
add_neg_cancel_right a b ▸ H
theorem add_le_of_le_sub_right {a b c : A} : a ≤ c - b → a + b ≤ c :=
iff.mpr (add_le_iff_le_sub_right a b c)
theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le {a b c : A} : a + b ≤ c → a ≤ c - b :=
iff.mp (add_le_iff_le_sub_right a b c)
theorem le_add_iff_neg_add_le : a ≤ b + c ↔ -b + a ≤ c :=
have H: a ≤ b + c ↔ -b + a ≤ -b + (b + c), from iff.symm (add_le_add_left_iff (-b) a (b + c)),
sorry -- by rewrite neg_add_cancel_left at H; exact H
theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le {a b c : A} : -b + a ≤ c → a ≤ b + c :=
iff.mpr (le_add_iff_neg_add_le a b c)
theorem neg_add_le_of_le_add {a b c : A} : a ≤ b + c → -b + a ≤ c :=
iff.mp (le_add_iff_neg_add_le a b c)
theorem le_add_iff_sub_left_le : a ≤ b + c ↔ a - b ≤ c :=
sorry -- by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg, {a+_}add.comm]; apply le_add_iff_neg_add_le
theorem le_add_of_sub_left_le {a b c : A} : a - b ≤ c → a ≤ b + c :=
iff.mpr (le_add_iff_sub_left_le a b c)
theorem sub_left_le_of_le_add {a b c : A} : a ≤ b + c → a - b ≤ c :=
iff.mp (le_add_iff_sub_left_le a b c)
theorem le_add_iff_sub_right_le : a ≤ b + c ↔ a - c ≤ b :=
have H: a ≤ b + c ↔ a - c ≤ b + c - c, from iff.symm (add_le_add_right_iff a (-c) (b + c)),
sorry -- by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg (b+c) c at H, add_neg_cancel_right at H]; exact H
theorem le_add_of_sub_right_le {a b c : A} : a - c ≤ b → a ≤ b + c :=
iff.mpr $ le_add_iff_sub_right_le a b c
theorem sub_right_le_of_le_add {a b c : A} : a ≤ b + c → a - c ≤ b :=
iff.mp $ le_add_iff_sub_right_le a b c
theorem le_add_iff_neg_add_le_left : a ≤ b + c ↔ -b + a ≤ c :=
have H: a ≤ b + c ↔ -b + a ≤ -b + (b + c), from iff.symm $ add_le_add_left_iff (-b) a (b + c),
sorry -- by rewrite neg_add_cancel_left at H; exact H
theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_left {a b c : A} : -b + a ≤ c → a ≤ b + c :=
iff.mpr $ le_add_iff_neg_add_le_left a b c
theorem neg_add_le_left_of_le_add {a b c : A} : a ≤ b + c → -b + a ≤ c :=
iff.mp $ le_add_iff_neg_add_le_left a b c
theorem le_add_iff_neg_add_le_right : a ≤ b + c ↔ -c + a ≤ b :=
sorry -- by rewrite add.comm; apply le_add_iff_neg_add_le_left
theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_right {a b c : A} : -c + a ≤ b → a ≤ b + c :=
iff.mpr $ le_add_iff_neg_add_le_right a b c
theorem neg_add_le_right_of_le_add {a b c : A} : a ≤ b + c → -c + a ≤ b :=
iff.mp $ le_add_iff_neg_add_le_right a b c
theorem le_add_iff_neg_le_sub_left : c ≤ a + b ↔ -a ≤ b - c :=
have H : c ≤ a + b ↔ -a + c ≤ b, from le_add_iff_neg_add_le c a b,
have H' : -a + c ≤ b ↔ -a ≤ b - c, from add_le_iff_le_sub_right (-a) c b,
iff.trans H H'
theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_left {a b c : A} : -a ≤ b - c → c ≤ a + b :=
iff.mpr $ le_add_iff_neg_le_sub_left a b c
theorem neg_le_sub_left_of_le_add {a b c : A} : c ≤ a + b → -a ≤ b - c :=
iff.mp $ le_add_iff_neg_le_sub_left a b c
theorem le_add_iff_neg_le_sub_right : c ≤ a + b ↔ -b ≤ a - c :=
sorry -- by rewrite add.comm; apply le_add_iff_neg_le_sub_left
theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_right {a b c : A} : -b ≤ a - c → c ≤ a + b :=
iff.mpr $ le_add_iff_neg_le_sub_right a b c
theorem neg_le_sub_right_of_le_add {a b c : A} : c ≤ a + b → -b ≤ a - c :=
iff.mp $ le_add_iff_neg_le_sub_right a b c
theorem add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_left : a + b < c ↔ b < -a + c :=
have H: a + b < c ↔ -a + (a + b) < -a + c, from iff.symm $ add_lt_add_left_iff (-a) (a + b) c,
sorry -- begin rewrite neg_add_cancel_left at H, exact H end
theorem add_lt_of_lt_neg_add_left {a b c : A} : b < -a + c → a + b < c :=
iff.mpr $ add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_left a b c
theorem lt_neg_add_left_of_add_lt {a b c : A} : a + b < c → b < -a + c :=
iff.mp $ add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_left a b c
theorem add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_right : a + b < c ↔ a < -b + c :=
sorry -- by rewrite add.comm; apply add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_left
theorem add_lt_of_lt_neg_add_right {a b c : A} : a < -b + c → a + b < c :=
iff.mpr $ add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_right a b c
theorem lt_neg_add_right_of_add_lt {a b c : A} : a + b < c → a < -b + c :=
iff.mp $ add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_right a b c
theorem add_lt_iff_lt_sub_left : a + b < c ↔ b < c - a :=
sorry
/-
begin
rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg, {c+_}add.comm],
apply add_lt_iff_lt_neg_add_left
end
-/
theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left {a b c : A} : b < c - a → a + b < c :=
iff.mpr $ add_lt_iff_lt_sub_left a b c
theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt {a b c : A} : a + b < c → b < c - a :=
iff.mp $ add_lt_iff_lt_sub_left a b c
theorem add_lt_iff_lt_sub_right : a + b < c ↔ a < c - b :=
sorry
/-
have H: a + b < c ↔ a + b - b < c - b, from iff.symm (!add_lt_add_right_iff),
by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg at H, add_neg_cancel_right at H]; exact H
-/
theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right {a b c : A} : a < c - b → a + b < c :=
iff.mpr $ add_lt_iff_lt_sub_right a b c
theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt {a b c : A} : a + b < c → a < c - b :=
iff.mp $ add_lt_iff_lt_sub_right a b c
theorem lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_left : a < b + c ↔ -b + a < c :=
sorry
/-
have H: a < b + c ↔ -b + a < -b + (b + c), from iff.symm (!add_lt_add_left_iff),
by rewrite neg_add_cancel_left at H; exact H
-/
theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left {a b c : A} : -b + a < c → a < b + c :=
iff.mpr $ lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_left a b c
theorem neg_add_lt_left_of_lt_add {a b c : A} : a < b + c → -b + a < c :=
iff.mp $ lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_left a b c
theorem lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_right : a < b + c ↔ -c + a < b :=
sorry -- by rewrite add.comm; apply lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_left
theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_right {a b c : A} : -c + a < b → a < b + c :=
iff.mpr $ lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_right a b c
theorem neg_add_lt_right_of_lt_add {a b c : A} : a < b + c → -c + a < b :=
iff.mp $ lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_right a b c
theorem lt_add_iff_sub_lt_left : a < b + c ↔ a - b < c :=
sorry -- by rewrite [sub_eq_add_neg, {a + _}add.comm]; apply lt_add_iff_neg_add_lt_left
theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_left {a b c : A} : a - b < c → a < b + c :=
iff.mpr $ lt_add_iff_sub_lt_left a b c
theorem sub_lt_left_of_lt_add {a b c : A} : a < b + c → a - b < c :=
iff.mp $ lt_add_iff_sub_lt_left a b c
theorem lt_add_iff_sub_lt_right : a < b + c ↔ a - c < b :=
sorry -- by rewrite add.comm; apply lt_add_iff_sub_lt_left
theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_right {a b c : A} : a - c < b → a < b + c :=
iff.mpr $ lt_add_iff_sub_lt_right a b c
theorem sub_lt_right_of_lt_add {a b c : A} : a < b + c → a - c < b :=
iff.mp $ lt_add_iff_sub_lt_right a b c
theorem sub_lt_of_sub_lt {a b c : A} : a - b < c → a - c < b :=
sorry
/-
begin
intro H,
apply sub_lt_left_of_lt_add,
apply lt_add_of_sub_lt_right H
end
-/
theorem sub_le_of_sub_le {a b c : A} : a - b ≤ c → a - c ≤ b :=
sorry
/-
begin
intro H,
apply sub_left_le_of_le_add,
apply le_add_of_sub_right_le H
end
-/
-- TODO: the Isabelle library has varations on a + b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ 0
theorem le_iff_le_of_sub_eq_sub {a b c d : A} (H : a - b = c - d) : a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d :=
calc
a ≤ b ↔ a - b ≤ 0 : iff.symm (sub_nonpos_iff_le a b)
... = (c - d ≤ 0) : sorry -- by rewrite H
... ↔ c ≤ d : sub_nonpos_iff_le c d
theorem lt_iff_lt_of_sub_eq_sub {a b c d : A} (H : a - b = c - d) : a < b ↔ c < d :=
calc
a < b ↔ a - b < 0 : iff.symm (sub_neg_iff_lt a b)
... = (c - d < 0) : sorry -- by rewrite H
... ↔ c < d : sub_neg_iff_lt c d
theorem sub_le_sub_left {a b : A} (H : a ≤ b) (c : A) : c - b ≤ c - a :=
add_le_add_left (neg_le_neg H) c
theorem sub_le_sub_right {a b : A} (H : a ≤ b) (c : A) : a - c ≤ b - c := add_le_add_right H (-c)
theorem sub_le_sub {a b c d : A} (Hab : a ≤ b) (Hcd : c ≤ d) : a - d ≤ b - c :=
add_le_add Hab (neg_le_neg Hcd)
theorem sub_lt_sub_left {a b : A} (H : a < b) (c : A) : c - b < c - a :=
add_lt_add_left (neg_lt_neg H) c
theorem sub_lt_sub_right {a b : A} (H : a < b) (c : A) : a - c < b - c := add_lt_add_right H (-c)
theorem sub_lt_sub {a b c d : A} (Hab : a < b) (Hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
add_lt_add Hab (neg_lt_neg Hcd)
theorem sub_lt_sub_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : A} (Hab : a ≤ b) (Hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt Hab (neg_lt_neg Hcd)
theorem sub_lt_sub_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : A} (Hab : a < b) (Hcd : c ≤ d) : a - d < b - c :=
add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le Hab (neg_le_neg Hcd)
theorem sub_le_self (a : A) {b : A} (H : b ≥ 0) : a - b ≤ a :=
sorry
/-
calc
a - b = a + -b : rfl
... ≤ a + 0 : add_le_add_left (neg_nonpos_of_nonneg H) _
... = a : by rewrite add_zero
-/
theorem sub_lt_self (a : A) {b : A} (H : b > 0) : a - b < a :=
calc
a - b = a + -b : rfl
... < a + 0 : add_lt_add_left (neg_neg_of_pos H) _
... = a : sorry -- by rewrite add_zero
theorem add_le_add_three {a b c d e f : A} (H1 : a ≤ d) (H2 : b ≤ e) (H3 : c ≤ f) :
a + b + c ≤ d + e + f :=
sorry
/-
begin
apply le.trans,
apply add_le_add,
apply add_le_add,
repeat assumption,
apply le.refl
end
-/
theorem sub_le_of_nonneg {b : A} (H : b ≥ 0) : a - b ≤ a :=
add_le_of_le_of_nonpos (le.refl a) (neg_nonpos_of_nonneg H)
theorem sub_lt_of_pos {b : A} (H : b > 0) : a - b < a :=
add_lt_of_le_of_neg (le.refl a) (neg_neg_of_pos H)
theorem neg_add_neg_le_neg_of_pos {a : A} (H : a > 0) : -a + -a ≤ -a :=
neg_add a a ▸ neg_le_neg (le_add_of_nonneg_left (le_of_lt H))
variable (A)
theorem strictly_decreasing_neg : strictly_decreasing (λ x : A, -x) :=
@neg_lt_neg A _
variable {A}
section
variable [strict_order B]
theorem strictly_decreasing_neg_of_strictly_increasing {f : B → A}
(H : strictly_increasing f) : strictly_decreasing (λ x, - f x) :=
strictly_decreasing_comp_dec_inc (strictly_decreasing_neg A) H
theorem strictly_increasing_neg_of_strictly_decreasing {f : B → A}
(H : strictly_decreasing f) : strictly_increasing (λ x, - f x) :=
strictly_increasing_comp_dec_dec (strictly_decreasing_neg A) H
theorem strictly_decreasing_of_strictly_increasing_neg {f : B → A}
(H : strictly_increasing (λ x, - f x)) : strictly_decreasing f :=
strictly_decreasing_of_strictly_increasing_comp_right (left_inverse_neg A)
(strictly_decreasing_neg A) H
theorem strictly_increasing_of_strictly_decreasing_neg {f : B → A}
(H : strictly_decreasing (λ x, - f x)) : strictly_increasing f :=
strictly_increasing_of_strictly_decreasing_comp_right (left_inverse_neg A)
(strictly_decreasing_neg A) H
theorem strictly_decreasing_neg_iff {f : B → A} :
strictly_decreasing (λ x, - f x) ↔ strictly_increasing f :=
iff.intro strictly_increasing_of_strictly_decreasing_neg
strictly_decreasing_neg_of_strictly_increasing
theorem strictly_increasing_neg_iff {f : B → A} :
strictly_increasing (λ x, - f x) ↔ strictly_decreasing f :=
iff.intro strictly_decreasing_of_strictly_increasing_neg
strictly_increasing_neg_of_strictly_decreasing
theorem strictly_decreasing_neg_of_strictly_increasing' {f : A → B}
(H : strictly_increasing f) : strictly_decreasing (λ x, f (-x)) :=
strictly_decreasing_comp_inc_dec H (strictly_decreasing_neg A)
theorem strictly_increasing_neg_of_strictly_decreasing' {f : A → B}
(H : strictly_decreasing f) : strictly_increasing (λ x, f (-x)) :=
strictly_increasing_comp_dec_dec H (strictly_decreasing_neg A)
theorem strictly_decreasing_of_strictly_increasing_neg' {f : A → B}
(H : strictly_increasing (λ x, f (-x))) : strictly_decreasing f :=
strictly_decreasing_of_strictly_increasing_comp_left (left_inverse_neg A)
(strictly_decreasing_neg A) H
theorem strictly_increasing_of_strictly_decreasing_neg' {f : A → B}
(H : strictly_decreasing (λ x, f (-x))) : strictly_increasing f :=
strictly_increasing_of_strictly_decreasing_comp_left (left_inverse_neg A)
(strictly_decreasing_neg A) H
theorem strictly_decreasing_neg_iff' {f : A → B} :
strictly_decreasing (λ x, f (-x)) ↔ strictly_increasing f :=
iff.intro strictly_increasing_of_strictly_decreasing_neg'
strictly_decreasing_neg_of_strictly_increasing'
theorem strictly_increasing_neg_iff' {f : A → B} :
strictly_increasing (λ x, f (-x)) ↔ strictly_decreasing f :=
iff.intro strictly_decreasing_of_strictly_increasing_neg'
strictly_increasing_neg_of_strictly_decreasing'
end
section
variable [weak_order B]
theorem nondecreasing_of_neg_nonincreasing {f : B → A} (H : nonincreasing (λ x, -f x)) :
nondecreasing f :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂, le_of_neg_le_neg (H this)
theorem nonincreasing_neg {f : B → A} (H : nondecreasing f) : nonincreasing (λ x, -f x) :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂, neg_le_neg (H this)
theorem nonincreasing_neg_iff (f : B → A) : nonincreasing (λ x, - f x) ↔ nondecreasing f :=
iff.intro nondecreasing_of_neg_nonincreasing nonincreasing_neg
theorem nonincreasing_of_neg_nondecreasing {f : B → A} (H : nondecreasing (λ x, -f x)) :
nonincreasing f :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂, le_of_neg_le_neg (H this)
theorem nondecreasing_neg {f : B → A} (H : nonincreasing f) : nondecreasing (λ x, -f x) :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂, neg_le_neg (H this)
theorem nondecreasing_neg_iff (f : B → A) : nondecreasing (λ x, - f x) ↔ nonincreasing f :=
iff.intro nonincreasing_of_neg_nondecreasing nondecreasing_neg
theorem nondecreasing_of_neg_nonincreasing' {f : A → B} (H : nonincreasing (λ x, f (-x))) :
nondecreasing f :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂,
have f(-(-a₁)) ≤ f(-(-a₂)), from H (neg_le_neg this),
sorry -- by rewrite *neg_neg at this; exact this
theorem nonincreasing_neg' {f : A → B} (H : nondecreasing f) : nonincreasing (λ x, f (-x)) :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂, H (neg_le_neg this)
theorem nonincreasing_neg_iff' (f : A → B) : nonincreasing (λ x, f (- x)) ↔ nondecreasing f :=
iff.intro nondecreasing_of_neg_nonincreasing' nonincreasing_neg'
theorem nonincreasing_of_neg_nondecreasing' {f : A → B} (H : nondecreasing (λ x, f (-x))) :
nonincreasing f :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂,
have f(-(-a₁)) ≥ f(-(-a₂)), from H (neg_le_neg this),
sorry -- by rewrite *neg_neg at this; exact this
theorem nondecreasing_neg' {f : A → B} (H : nonincreasing f) : nondecreasing (λ x, f (-x)) :=
take a₁ a₂, suppose a₁ ≤ a₂, H (neg_le_neg this)
theorem nondecreasing_neg_iff' (f : A → B) : nondecreasing (λ x, f (- x)) ↔ nonincreasing f :=
iff.intro nonincreasing_of_neg_nondecreasing' nondecreasing_neg'
end
end
/- linear ordered group with decidable order -/
structure decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group [class] (A : Type)
extends add_comm_group A, decidable_linear_order A :=
(add_le_add_left : ∀ a b, le a b → ∀ c, le (add c a) (add c b))
(add_lt_add_left : ∀ a b, lt a b → ∀ c, lt (add c a) (add c b))
definition decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group.to_ordered_comm_group
[instance]
(A : Type) [s : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group A] : ordered_comm_group A :=
⦃ ordered_comm_group, s,
le_of_lt := @le_of_lt A _,
lt_of_le_of_lt := @lt_of_le_of_lt A _,
lt_of_lt_of_le := @lt_of_lt_of_le A _ ⦄
definition decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group.to_decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
[instance] (A : Type) [s : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group A] :
decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid A :=
⦃ decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid, s,
@ordered_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid A _ ⦄
section
variables [s : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group A]
variables {a b c d e : A}
include s
theorem max_neg_neg : max (-a) (-b) = - min a b :=
eq.symm (eq_max
(show -a ≤ -(min a b), from neg_le_neg $ min_le_left a b)
(show -b ≤ -(min a b), from neg_le_neg $ min_le_right a b)
(take d,
assume H₁ : -a ≤ d,
assume H₂ : -b ≤ d,
have H : -d ≤ min a b,
from le_min (iff.mp (neg_le_iff_neg_le a d) H₁) (iff.mp (neg_le_iff_neg_le b d) H₂),
show -(min a b) ≤ d, from iff.mp (neg_le_iff_neg_le d (min a b)) H))
theorem min_eq_neg_max_neg_neg : min a b = - max (-a) (-b) :=
sorry -- by rewrite [max_neg_neg, neg_neg]
theorem min_neg_neg : min (-a) (-b) = - max a b :=
sorry -- by rewrite [min_eq_neg_max_neg_neg, *neg_neg]
theorem max_eq_neg_min_neg_neg : max a b = - min (-a) (-b) :=
sorry -- by rewrite [min_neg_neg, neg_neg]
/- absolute value -/
variables {a b c}
definition abs (a : A) : A := max a (-a)
theorem abs_of_nonneg (H : a ≥ 0) : abs a = a :=
have H' : -a ≤ a, from le.trans (neg_nonpos_of_nonneg H) H,
max_eq_left H'
theorem abs_of_pos (H : a > 0) : abs a = a :=
abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt H)
theorem abs_of_nonpos (H : a ≤ 0) : abs a = -a :=
have H' : a ≤ -a, from le.trans H (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H),
max_eq_right H'
theorem abs_of_neg (H : a < 0) : abs a = -a := abs_of_nonpos (le_of_lt H)
theorem abs_zero : abs 0 = (0:A) := abs_of_nonneg (le.refl _)
theorem abs_neg (a : A) : abs (-a) = abs a :=
sorry -- by rewrite [↑abs, max.comm, neg_neg]
theorem abs_pos_of_pos (H : a > 0) : abs a > 0 :=
sorry -- by rewrite (abs_of_pos H); exact H
theorem abs_pos_of_neg (H : a < 0) : abs a > 0 :=
abs_neg a ▸ abs_pos_of_pos (neg_pos_of_neg H)
theorem abs_sub (a b : A) : abs (a - b) = abs (b - a) :=
sorry -- by rewrite [-neg_sub, abs_neg]
theorem ne_zero_of_abs_ne_zero {a : A} (H : abs a ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 :=
assume Ha, H (symm Ha ▸ abs_zero)
/- these assume a linear order -/
theorem eq_zero_of_neg_eq (H : -a = a) : a = 0 :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H1 : a < 0,
have H2: a > 0, from H ▸ neg_pos_of_neg H1,
absurd H1 (lt.asymm H2))
(assume H1 : a = 0, H1)
(assume H1 : a > 0,
have H2: a < 0, from H ▸ neg_neg_of_pos H1,
absurd H1 (lt.asymm H2))
theorem abs_nonneg (a : A) : abs a ≥ 0 :=
sorry
/-
or.elim (le.total 0 a)
(assume H : 0 ≤ a, by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H); exact H)
(assume H : a ≤ 0,
calc
0 ≤ -a : neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H
... = abs a : eq.symm (abs_of_nonpos H))
-/
theorem abs_abs (a : A) : abs (abs a) = abs a := abs_of_nonneg $ abs_nonneg a
theorem le_abs_self (a : A) : a ≤ abs a :=
or.elim (le.total 0 a)
(assume H : 0 ≤ a, abs_of_nonneg H ▸ le.refl (abs a))
(assume H : a ≤ 0, le.trans H $ abs_nonneg a)
theorem neg_le_abs_self (a : A) : -a ≤ abs a :=
abs_neg a ▸ le_abs_self (-a)
theorem eq_zero_of_abs_eq_zero (H : abs a = 0) : a = 0 :=
have H1 : a ≤ 0, from H ▸ le_abs_self a,
have H2 : -a ≤ 0, from H ▸ abs_neg a ▸ le_abs_self (-a),
le.antisymm H1 (nonneg_of_neg_nonpos H2)
theorem abs_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero (a : A) : abs a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
iff.intro eq_zero_of_abs_eq_zero (assume H, trans (congr_arg abs H) abs_zero)
theorem eq_of_abs_sub_eq_zero {a b : A} (H : abs (a - b) = 0) : a = b :=
have a - b = 0, from eq_zero_of_abs_eq_zero H,
show a = b, from eq_of_sub_eq_zero this
theorem abs_pos_of_ne_zero (H : a ≠ 0) : abs a > 0 :=
or.elim (lt_or_gt_of_ne H) abs_pos_of_neg abs_pos_of_pos
theorem abs.by_cases {P : A → Prop} {a : A} (H1 : P a) (H2 : P (-a)) : P (abs a) :=
or.elim (le.total 0 a)
(assume H : 0 ≤ a, symm (abs_of_nonneg H) ▸ H1)
(assume H : a ≤ 0, symm (abs_of_nonpos H) ▸ H2)
theorem abs_le_of_le_of_neg_le (H1 : a ≤ b) (H2 : -a ≤ b) : abs a ≤ b :=
abs.by_cases H1 H2
theorem abs_lt_of_lt_of_neg_lt (H1 : a < b) (H2 : -a < b) : abs a < b :=
abs.by_cases H1 H2
-- the triangle inequality
section
private lemma aux1 {a b : A} (H1 : a + b ≥ 0) (H2 : a ≥ 0) : abs (a + b) ≤ abs a + abs b :=
sorry
/-
decidable.by_cases
(assume H3 : b ≥ 0,
calc
abs (a + b) ≤ abs (a + b) : !le.refl
... = a + b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H1)
... = abs a + b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H2)
... = abs a + abs b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H3))
(assume H3 : ¬ b ≥ 0,
have H4 : b ≤ 0, from le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge H3),
calc
abs (a + b) = a + b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H1)
... = abs a + b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H2)
... ≤ abs a + 0 : add_le_add_left H4 _
... ≤ abs a + -b : add_le_add_left (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H4) _
... = abs a + abs b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonpos H4))
-/
private lemma aux2 {a b : A} (H1 : a + b ≥ 0) : abs (a + b) ≤ abs a + abs b :=
sorry
/-
or.elim (le.total b 0)
(assume H2 : b ≤ 0,
have H3 : ¬ a < 0, from
assume H4 : a < 0,
have H5 : a + b < 0, from !add_zero ▸ add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le H4 H2,
not_lt_of_ge H1 H5,
aux1 H1 (le_of_not_gt H3))
(assume H2 : 0 ≤ b,
begin
have H3 : abs (b + a) ≤ abs b + abs a,
begin
rewrite add.comm at H1,
exact aux1 H1 H2
end,
rewrite [add.comm, {abs a + _}add.comm],
exact H3
end)
-/
theorem abs_add_le_abs_add_abs (a b : A) : abs (a + b) ≤ abs a + abs b :=
sorry
/-
or.elim (le.total 0 (a + b))
(assume H2 : 0 ≤ a + b, aux2 H2)
(assume H2 : a + b ≤ 0,
have H3 : -a + -b = -(a + b), by rewrite neg_add,
have H4 : -(a + b) ≥ 0, from iff.mpr (neg_nonneg_iff_nonpos (a+b)) H2,
have H5 : -a + -b ≥ 0, begin rewrite -H3 at H4, exact H4 end,
calc
abs (a + b) = abs (-a + -b) : by rewrite [-abs_neg, neg_add]
... ≤ abs (-a) + abs (-b) : aux2 H5
... = abs a + abs b : by rewrite *abs_neg)
-/
theorem abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub (a b : A) : abs a - abs b ≤ abs (a - b) :=
sorry
/-
have H1 : abs a - abs b + abs b ≤ abs (a - b) + abs b, from
calc
abs a - abs b + abs b = abs a : by rewrite sub_add_cancel
... = abs (a - b + b) : by rewrite sub_add_cancel
... ≤ abs (a - b) + abs b : !abs_add_le_abs_add_abs,
le_of_add_le_add_right H1
-/
theorem abs_sub_le (a b c : A) : abs (a - c) ≤ abs (a - b) + abs (b - c) :=
sorry
/-
calc
abs (a - c) = abs (a - b + (b - c)) : by rewrite [*sub_eq_add_neg, add.assoc, neg_add_cancel_left]
... ≤ abs (a - b) + abs (b - c) : !abs_add_le_abs_add_abs
-/
theorem abs_add_three (a b c : A) : abs (a + b + c) ≤ abs a + abs b + abs c :=
sorry
/-
begin
apply le.trans,
apply abs_add_le_abs_add_abs,
apply le.trans,
apply add_le_add_right,
apply abs_add_le_abs_add_abs,
apply le.refl
end
-/
theorem dist_bdd_within_interval {a b lb ub : A} (H : lb < ub) (Hal : lb ≤ a) (Hau : a ≤ ub)
(Hbl : lb ≤ b) (Hbu : b ≤ ub) : abs (a - b) ≤ ub - lb :=
sorry
/-
begin
cases (decidable.em (b ≤ a)) with [Hba, Hba],
rewrite (abs_of_nonneg (iff.mpr !sub_nonneg_iff_le Hba)),
apply sub_le_sub,
apply Hau,
apply Hbl,
rewrite [abs_of_neg (iff.mpr !sub_neg_iff_lt (lt_of_not_ge Hba)), neg_sub],
apply sub_le_sub,
apply Hbu,
apply Hal
end
-/
end
end
|
76d8cc39306dd5b4b06930c05aecddab77bdb42a | 6772a11d96d69b3f90d6eeaf7f9accddf2a7691d | /examples/universal_algebra.lean | c8bf6a8b3607f9daaa53aaf37f90927acda8c710 | [] | no_license | lbordowitz/lean-category-theory | 5397361f0f81037d65762da48de2c16ec85a5e4b | 8c59893e44af3804eba4dbc5f7fa5928ed2e0ae6 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,310,752,156 | 1,487,070,172,000 | 1,487,070,172,000 | 82,003,141 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,487,118,553,000 | 1,487,118,553,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 873 | lean | import data.vector
inductive {u} hlist : list (Type u) → Type (u+1)
| nil : hlist []
| cons : Π {α : Type u} {l : list (Type u)}, α → hlist l → hlist (α::l)
notation a :: b := hlist.cons a b
notation `[` l:(foldr `, ` (h t, hlist.cons h t) hlist.nil `]`) := l
structure Operad :=
(operations : list (ℕ × ℕ))
-- TODO relations, too!
structure algebra_over_operad (O: Operad) ( α : Type ) :=
(operations : hlist (list.map (λ n : ℕ × ℕ, (vector α n^.fst) → (vector α n^.snd)) O^.operations)) -- heterogeneous list of functions between tuples
structure morphism_over_operad (O: Operad) { α β : Type } ( source : algebra_over_operad O α ) ( target : algebra_over_operad O β ) :=
(map : α → β)
(preserving_structure : hlist (list.map (λ n : ℕ × ℕ, Type /- TODO replace `Type` with the appropriate equality -/) O^.operations)) |
045535d8d978e46b84b53484e67e1fb72139f9c2 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/nat/part_enat.lean | 4cb2cab0e2b73a67754a03af9f0e7d3a3d25fa98 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,107 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import algebra.hom.equiv.basic
import data.part
import data.enat.basic
import tactic.norm_num
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `ordered_add_comm_monoid part_enat`
* `canonically_ordered_add_monoid part_enat`
* `complete_linear_order part_enat`
There is no additive analogue of `monoid_with_zero`; if there were then `part_enat` could
be an `add_monoid_with_top`.
* `to_with_top` : the map from `part_enat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `with_top_add_equiv : part_enat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `with_top_order_iso : part_enat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`part_enat` is defined to be `part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `part_enat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `part_enat`.
Before the `open_locale classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `to_with_top_zero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma to_with_top_zero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
part_enat, ℕ∞
-/
open part (hiding some)
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def part_enat : Type := part ℕ
namespace part_enat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → part_enat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → part_enat`, see `part_enat.some_eq_coe`.
However, `coe` is noncomputable so `some` is preferable when computability is a concern. -/
def some : ℕ → part_enat := part.some
instance : has_zero part_enat := ⟨some 0⟩
instance : inhabited part_enat := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_one part_enat := ⟨some 1⟩
instance : has_add part_enat := ⟨λ x y, ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom, λ h, get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : decidable (some n).dom := is_true trivial
@[simp] lemma dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).dom := trivial
instance : add_comm_monoid part_enat :=
{ add := (+),
zero := (0),
add_comm := λ x y, part.ext' and.comm (λ _ _, add_comm _ _),
zero_add := λ x, part.ext' (true_and _) (λ _ _, zero_add _),
add_zero := λ x, part.ext' (and_true _) (λ _ _, add_zero _),
add_assoc := λ x y z, part.ext' and.assoc (λ _ _, add_assoc _ _ _) }
instance : add_monoid_with_one part_enat :=
{ one := 1,
nat_cast := some,
nat_cast_zero := rfl,
nat_cast_succ := λ _, part.ext' (true_and _).symm (λ _ _, rfl),
.. part_enat.add_comm_monoid }
lemma some_eq_coe (n : ℕ) : some n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : part_enat) = y ↔ x = y := part.some_inj
@[simp] lemma dom_coe (x : ℕ) : (x : part_enat).dom := trivial
instance : has_le part_enat := ⟨λ x y, ∃ h : y.dom → x.dom, ∀ hy : y.dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : has_top part_enat := ⟨none⟩
instance : has_bot part_enat := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_sup part_enat := ⟨λ x y, ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom, λ h, x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
lemma le_def (x y : part_enat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.dom → x.dom, ∀ hy : y.dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
iff.rfl
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma cases_on' {P : part_enat → Prop} :
∀ a : part_enat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
part.induction_on
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma cases_on {P : part_enat → Prop} :
∀ a : part_enat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a :=
by { simp only [← some_eq_coe], exact part_enat.cases_on' }
@[simp] lemma top_add (x : part_enat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
part.ext' (false_and _) (λ h, h.left.elim)
@[simp] lemma add_top (x : part_enat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp] lemma coe_get {x : part_enat} (h : x.dom) : (x.get h : part_enat) = x :=
by { rw [← some_eq_coe], exact part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) (λ _ _, rfl) }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma get_coe' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : part_enat).dom) : get (x : part_enat) h = x :=
by rw [← coe_inj, coe_get]
lemma get_coe {x : ℕ} : get (x : part_enat) (dom_coe x) = x := get_coe' _ _
lemma coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : part_enat} (h : ((x : part_enat) + y).dom) :
get ((x : part_enat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 :=
by { simp only [← some_eq_coe] at h ⊢, refl }
@[simp] lemma get_add {x y : part_enat} (h : (x + y).dom) :
get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma get_zero (h : (0 : part_enat).dom) : (0 : part_enat).get h = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma get_one (h : (1 : part_enat).dom) : (1 : part_enat).get h = 1 := rfl
lemma get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : part_enat} {ha : a.dom} {b : ℕ} :
a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b := get_eq_iff_eq_some
lemma get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : part_enat} {ha : a.dom} {b : ℕ} :
a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some, some_eq_coe]
lemma dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : part_enat} : x ≤ y → y.dom → x.dom := λ ⟨h, _⟩, h
lemma dom_of_le_some {x : part_enat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.dom := dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
lemma dom_of_le_coe {x : part_enat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.dom :=
by { rw [← some_eq_coe] at h, exact dom_of_le_some h }
instance decidable_le (x y : part_enat) [decidable x.dom] [decidable y.dom] : decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.dom
then decidable_of_decidable_of_iff
(show decidable (∀ (hy : (y : part_enat).dom), x.get hx ≤ (y : part_enat).get hy),
from forall_prop_decidable _) $
by { dsimp [(≤)], simp only [hx, exists_prop_of_true, forall_true_iff] }
else if hy : y.dom
then is_false $ λ h, hx $ dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else is_true ⟨λ h, (hy h).elim, λ h, (hy h).elim⟩
/-- The coercion `ℕ → part_enat` preserves `0` and addition. -/
def coe_hom : ℕ →+ part_enat := ⟨coe, nat.cast_zero, nat.cast_add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_coe_hom : ⇑coe_hom = coe := rfl
instance : partial_order part_enat :=
{ le := (≤),
le_refl := λ x, ⟨id, λ _, le_rfl⟩,
le_trans := λ x y z ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩,
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, λ _, le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩,
le_antisymm := λ x y ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩, part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩
(λ _ _, le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)) }
lemma lt_def (x y : part_enat) : x < y ↔ ∃ (hx : x.dom), ∀ (hy : y.dom), x.get hx < y.get hy :=
begin
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists],
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩,
by_cases hx : x.dom,
{ use hx, intro hy,
specialize H hy, specialize h (λ _, hy),
rw not_forall at h, cases h with hx' h,
rw not_le at h, exact h },
{ specialize h (λ hx', (hx hx').elim),
rw not_forall at h, cases h with hx' h,
exact (hx hx').elim } },
{ rintro ⟨hx, H⟩, exact ⟨⟨λ _, hx, λ hy, (H hy).le⟩, λ hxy h, not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩ }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : part_enat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
by { rw [← some_eq_coe, ← some_eq_coe], exact ⟨λ ⟨_, h⟩, h trivial, λ h, ⟨λ _, trivial, λ _, h⟩⟩ }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : part_enat) < y ↔ x < y :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lt_iff_le_not_le, coe_le_coe, coe_le_coe]
@[simp] lemma get_le_get {x y : part_enat} {hx : x.dom} {hy : y.dom} :
x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y :=
by conv { to_lhs, rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_get, coe_get]}
lemma le_coe_iff (x : part_enat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.dom, x.get h ≤ n :=
begin
rw [← some_eq_coe],
show (∃ (h : true → x.dom), _) ↔ ∃ h : x.dom, x.get h ≤ n,
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, some_eq_coe, dom_coe, get_coe']
end
lemma lt_coe_iff (x : part_enat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.dom, x.get h < n :=
by simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_coe', dom_coe]
lemma coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : part_enat) : (n : part_enat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.dom, n ≤ x.get h :=
begin
rw [← some_eq_coe],
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff],
refl,
end
lemma coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : part_enat) : (n : part_enat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.dom, n < x.get h :=
begin
rw [← some_eq_coe],
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff],
refl,
end
instance ne_zero.one : ne_zero (1 : part_enat) := ⟨coe_inj.not.mpr dec_trivial⟩
instance semilattice_sup : semilattice_sup part_enat :=
{ sup := (⊔),
le_sup_left := λ _ _, ⟨and.left, λ _, le_sup_left⟩,
le_sup_right := λ _ _, ⟨and.right, λ _, le_sup_right⟩,
sup_le := λ x y z ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, ⟨λ hz, ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩,
λ _, sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩,
..part_enat.partial_order }
instance order_bot : order_bot part_enat :=
{ bot := (⊥),
bot_le := λ _, ⟨λ _, trivial, λ _, nat.zero_le _⟩ }
instance order_top : order_top part_enat :=
{ top := (⊤),
le_top := λ x, ⟨λ h, false.elim h, λ hy, false.elim hy⟩ }
lemma eq_zero_iff {x : part_enat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := eq_bot_iff
lemma ne_zero_iff {x : part_enat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
lemma dom_of_lt {x y : part_enat} : x < y → x.dom :=
part_enat.cases_on x not_top_lt $ λ _ _, dom_coe _
lemma top_eq_none : (⊤ : part_enat) = none := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : part_enat) < ⊤ :=
ne.lt_top (λ h, absurd (congr_arg dom h) $ by simpa only [dom_coe] using true_ne_false)
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : part_enat) ≠ ⊤ := ne_of_lt (coe_lt_top x)
lemma not_is_max_coe (x : ℕ) : ¬ is_max (x : part_enat) :=
not_is_max_of_lt (coe_lt_top x)
lemma ne_top_iff {x : part_enat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ), x = n :=
by simpa only [← some_eq_coe] using part.ne_none_iff
lemma ne_top_iff_dom {x : part_enat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.dom :=
by classical; exact not_iff_comm.1 part.eq_none_iff'.symm
lemma not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : part_enat} : ¬ x.dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
lemma ne_top_of_lt {x y : part_enat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt $ lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
lemma eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : part_enat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : part_enat) < x :=
begin
split,
{ rintro rfl n, exact coe_lt_top _ },
{ contrapose!, rw ne_top_iff, rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩, exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩ }
end
lemma eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : part_enat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : part_enat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨λ h n, (h n).le, λ h n, lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
lemma pos_iff_one_le {x : part_enat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
part_enat.cases_on x (by simp only [iff_true, le_top, coe_lt_top, ← @nat.cast_zero part_enat]) $
λ n, by { rw [← nat.cast_zero, ← nat.cast_one, part_enat.coe_lt_coe, part_enat.coe_le_coe], refl }
instance : is_total part_enat (≤) :=
{ total := λ x y, part_enat.cases_on x
(or.inr le_top) (part_enat.cases_on y (λ _, or.inl le_top)
(λ x y, (le_total x y).elim (or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2)
(or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))) }
noncomputable instance : linear_order part_enat :=
{ le_total := is_total.total,
decidable_le := classical.dec_rel _,
max := (⊔),
max_def := @sup_eq_max_default _ _ (id _) _,
..part_enat.partial_order }
instance : bounded_order part_enat :=
{ ..part_enat.order_top,
..part_enat.order_bot }
noncomputable instance : lattice part_enat :=
{ inf := min,
inf_le_left := min_le_left,
inf_le_right := min_le_right,
le_inf := λ _ _ _, le_min,
..part_enat.semilattice_sup }
instance : ordered_add_comm_monoid part_enat :=
{ add_le_add_left := λ a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c,
part_enat.cases_on c (by simp)
(λ c, ⟨λ h, and.intro (dom_coe _) (h₁ h.2),
λ h, by simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩),
..part_enat.linear_order,
..part_enat.add_comm_monoid }
instance : canonically_ordered_add_monoid part_enat :=
{ le_self_add := λ a b, part_enat.cases_on b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) $
λ b, part_enat.cases_on a (top_add _).ge $
λ a, (coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (nat.cast_add _ _),
exists_add_of_le := λ a b, part_enat.cases_on b (λ _, ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) $
λ b, part_enat.cases_on a (λ h, ((coe_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) $ λ a h, ⟨(b - a : ℕ),
by rw [←nat.cast_add, coe_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩,
..part_enat.semilattice_sup,
..part_enat.order_bot,
..part_enat.ordered_add_comm_monoid }
protected lemma add_lt_add_right {x y z : part_enat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z :=
begin
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
induction y using part_enat.cases_on with n,
{ rw [top_add], apply_mod_cast coe_lt_top },
norm_cast at h, apply_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h
end
protected lemma add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : part_enat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, λ h, part_enat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected lemma add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : part_enat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y :=
by rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected lemma lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : part_enat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y :=
by { conv_rhs { rw [← part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx] }, rw [add_zero] }
lemma lt_add_one {x : part_enat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 :=
by { rw [part_enat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx], norm_cast, norm_num }
lemma le_of_lt_add_one {x y : part_enat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y :=
begin
induction y using part_enat.cases_on with n, apply le_top,
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
apply_mod_cast nat.le_of_lt_succ, apply_mod_cast h
end
lemma add_one_le_of_lt {x y : part_enat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y :=
begin
induction y using part_enat.cases_on with n, apply le_top,
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
apply_mod_cast nat.succ_le_of_lt, apply_mod_cast h
end
lemma add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : part_enat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y :=
begin
split, swap, exact add_one_le_of_lt,
intro h, rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
induction y using part_enat.cases_on with n, apply coe_lt_top,
apply_mod_cast nat.lt_of_succ_le, apply_mod_cast h
end
lemma lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : part_enat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y :=
begin
split, exact le_of_lt_add_one,
intro h, rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
induction y using part_enat.cases_on with n, { rw [top_add], apply coe_lt_top },
apply_mod_cast nat.lt_succ_of_le, apply_mod_cast h
end
lemma add_eq_top_iff {a b : part_enat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ :=
by apply part_enat.cases_on a; apply part_enat.cases_on b;
simp; simp only [(nat.cast_add _ _).symm, part_enat.coe_ne_top]; simp
protected lemma add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : part_enat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b :=
begin
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩,
apply part_enat.cases_on a; apply part_enat.cases_on b;
simp [add_eq_top_iff, coe_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : part_enat)];
simp only [(nat.cast_add _ _).symm, add_left_cancel_iff, part_enat.coe_inj, add_comm];
tauto
end
protected lemma add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : part_enat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
by rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, part_enat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section with_top
/-- Computably converts an `part_enat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def to_with_top (x : part_enat) [decidable x.dom] : ℕ∞ := x.to_option
lemma to_with_top_top : to_with_top ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_top' {h : decidable (⊤ : part_enat).dom} : to_with_top ⊤ = ⊤ :=
by convert to_with_top_top
lemma to_with_top_zero : to_with_top 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_zero' {h : decidable (0 : part_enat).dom} : to_with_top 0 = 0 :=
by convert to_with_top_zero
lemma to_with_top_some (n : ℕ) : to_with_top (some n) = n := rfl
lemma to_with_top_coe (n : ℕ) {_ : decidable (n : part_enat).dom} : to_with_top n = n :=
by simp only [← some_eq_coe, ← to_with_top_some]
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_coe' (n : ℕ) {h : decidable (n : part_enat).dom} :
to_with_top (n : part_enat) = n :=
by convert to_with_top_coe n
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_le {x y : part_enat} : Π [decidable x.dom]
[decidable y.dom], by exactI to_with_top x ≤ to_with_top y ↔ x ≤ y :=
part_enat.cases_on y (by simp) (part_enat.cases_on x (by simp) (by intros; simp))
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_lt {x y : part_enat} [decidable x.dom] [decidable y.dom] :
to_with_top x < to_with_top y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le to_with_top_le
end with_top
section with_top_equiv
open_locale classical
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_add {x y : part_enat} :
to_with_top (x + y) = to_with_top x + to_with_top y :=
by apply part_enat.cases_on y; apply part_enat.cases_on x; simp [← nat.cast_add, ← enat.coe_add]
/-- `equiv` between `part_enat` and `ℕ∞` (for the order isomorphism see
`with_top_order_iso`). -/
noncomputable def with_top_equiv : part_enat ≃ ℕ∞ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, to_with_top x,
inv_fun := λ x, match x with (option.some n) := coe n | none := ⊤ end,
left_inv := λ x, by apply part_enat.cases_on x; intros; simp; refl,
right_inv := λ x, by cases x; simp [with_top_equiv._match_1]; refl }
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_top : with_top_equiv ⊤ = ⊤ :=
to_with_top_top'
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_coe (n : nat) : with_top_equiv n = n :=
to_with_top_coe' _
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_zero : with_top_equiv 0 = 0 :=
by simpa only [nat.cast_zero] using with_top_equiv_coe 0
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_le {x y : part_enat} : with_top_equiv x ≤ with_top_equiv y ↔ x ≤ y :=
to_with_top_le
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_lt {x y : part_enat} : with_top_equiv x < with_top_equiv y ↔ x < y :=
to_with_top_lt
/-- `to_with_top` induces an order isomorphism between `part_enat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def with_top_order_iso : part_enat ≃o ℕ∞ :=
{ map_rel_iff' := λ _ _, with_top_equiv_le,
.. with_top_equiv}
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_symm_top : with_top_equiv.symm ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_symm_coe (n : nat) : with_top_equiv.symm n = n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_symm_zero : with_top_equiv.symm 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_symm_le {x y : ℕ∞} :
with_top_equiv.symm x ≤ with_top_equiv.symm y ↔ x ≤ y :=
by rw ← with_top_equiv_le; simp
@[simp] lemma with_top_equiv_symm_lt {x y : ℕ∞} :
with_top_equiv.symm x < with_top_equiv.symm y ↔ x < y :=
by rw ← with_top_equiv_lt; simp
/-- `to_with_top` induces an additive monoid isomorphism between `part_enat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def with_top_add_equiv : part_enat ≃+ ℕ∞ :=
{ map_add' := λ x y, by simp only [with_top_equiv]; convert to_with_top_add,
..with_top_equiv}
end with_top_equiv
lemma lt_wf : @well_founded part_enat (<) :=
begin
classical,
change well_founded (λ a b : part_enat, a < b),
simp_rw ←to_with_top_lt,
exact inv_image.wf _ (with_top.well_founded_lt nat.lt_wf)
end
instance : well_founded_lt part_enat := ⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : is_well_order part_enat (<) := { }
instance : has_well_founded part_enat := ⟨(<), lt_wf⟩
section find
variables (P : ℕ → Prop) [decidable_pred P]
/-- The smallest `part_enat` satisfying a (decidable) predicate `P : ℕ → Prop` -/
def find : part_enat := ⟨∃ n, P n, nat.find⟩
@[simp] lemma find_get (h : (find P).dom) : (find P).get h = nat.find h := rfl
lemma find_dom (h : ∃ n, P n) : (find P).dom := h
lemma lt_find (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m) : (n : part_enat) < find P :=
begin
rw coe_lt_iff, intro h', rw find_get,
have := @nat.find_spec P _ h',
contrapose! this,
exact h _ this
end
lemma lt_find_iff (n : ℕ) : (n : part_enat) < find P ↔ (∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, lt_find P n⟩,
intros h m hm,
by_cases H : (find P).dom,
{ apply nat.find_min H, rw coe_lt_iff at h, specialize h H, exact lt_of_le_of_lt hm h },
{ exact not_exists.mp H m }
end
lemma find_le (n : ℕ) (h : P n) : find P ≤ n :=
by { rw le_coe_iff, refine ⟨⟨_, h⟩, @nat.find_min' P _ _ _ h⟩ }
lemma find_eq_top_iff : find P = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n, ¬P n :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt _).trans
⟨λ h n, (lt_find_iff P n).mp (h n) _ le_rfl, λ h n, lt_find P n $ λ _ _, h _⟩
end find
noncomputable instance : linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid_with_top part_enat :=
{ top_add' := top_add,
.. part_enat.linear_order,
.. part_enat.ordered_add_comm_monoid,
.. part_enat.order_top }
noncomputable instance : complete_linear_order part_enat :=
{ inf := (⊓),
sup := (⊔),
top := ⊤,
bot := ⊥,
le := (≤),
lt := (<),
.. part_enat.lattice,
.. with_top_order_iso.symm.to_galois_insertion.lift_complete_lattice,
.. part_enat.linear_order, }
end part_enat
|
31fcb179b4d22fd528851ccb50271d569f5661f1 | 130c49f47783503e462c16b2eff31933442be6ff | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Simp.lean | f5c3b2e11b988e853dda2c514dfeeda96279a62f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Hazel-Brown/lean4 | 8aa5860e282435ffc30dcdfccd34006c59d1d39c | 79e6732fc6bbf5af831b76f310f9c488d44e7a16 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,218,208,951 | 1,629,736,869,000 | 1,629,736,896,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,933 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.ElabTerm
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Location
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Replace
import Lean.Elab.BuiltinNotation
namespace Lean.Elab.Tactic
open Meta
unsafe def evalSimpConfigUnsafe (e : Expr) : TermElabM Meta.Simp.Config :=
Term.evalExpr Meta.Simp.Config ``Meta.Simp.Config e
@[implementedBy evalSimpConfigUnsafe] constant evalSimpConfig (e : Expr) : TermElabM Meta.Simp.Config
unsafe def evalSimpConfigCtxUnsafe (e : Expr) : TermElabM Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx :=
Term.evalExpr Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx ``Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx e
@[implementedBy evalSimpConfigCtxUnsafe] constant evalSimpConfigCtx (e : Expr) : TermElabM Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx
/-
`optConfig` is of the form `("(" "config" ":=" term ")")?`
If `ctx == false`, the argument is assumed to have type `Meta.Simp.Config`, and `Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx` otherwise. -/
def elabSimpConfig (optConfig : Syntax) (ctx : Bool) : TermElabM Meta.Simp.Config := do
if optConfig.isNone then
if ctx then
return { : Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx }.toConfig
else
return {}
else
withoutModifyingState <| withLCtx {} {} <| Term.withSynthesize do
let c ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType optConfig[3] (Lean.mkConst (if ctx then ``Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx else ``Meta.Simp.Config))
if ctx then
return (← evalSimpConfigCtx (← instantiateMVars c)).toConfig
else
evalSimpConfig (← instantiateMVars c)
private def addDeclToUnfoldOrLemma (lemmas : Meta.SimpLemmas) (e : Expr) (post : Bool) (inv : Bool) : MetaM Meta.SimpLemmas := do
if e.isConst then
let declName := e.constName!
let info ← getConstInfo declName
if (← isProp info.type) then
lemmas.addConst declName (post := post) (inv := inv)
else
if inv then
throwError "invalid '←' modifier, '{declName}' is a declaration name to be unfolded"
lemmas.addDeclToUnfold declName
else
lemmas.add #[] e (post := post) (inv := inv)
private def addSimpLemma (lemmas : Meta.SimpLemmas) (stx : Syntax) (post : Bool) (inv : Bool) : TermElabM Meta.SimpLemmas := do
let (levelParams, proof) ← Term.withoutModifyingElabMetaStateWithInfo <| withRef stx <| Term.withoutErrToSorry do
let e ← Term.elabTerm stx none
Term.synthesizeSyntheticMVars (mayPostpone := false) (ignoreStuckTC := true)
let e ← instantiateMVars e
let e := e.eta
if e.hasMVar then
let r ← abstractMVars e
return (r.paramNames, r.expr)
else
return (#[], e)
lemmas.add levelParams proof (post := post) (inv := inv)
structure ElabSimpArgsResult where
ctx : Simp.Context
starArg : Bool := false
/--
Elaborate extra simp lemmas provided to `simp`. `stx` is of the `simpLemma,*`
If `eraseLocal == true`, then we consider local declarations when resolving names for erased lemmas (`- id`),
this option only makes sense for `simp_all`.
-/
private def elabSimpArgs (stx : Syntax) (ctx : Simp.Context) (eraseLocal : Bool) : TacticM ElabSimpArgsResult := do
if stx.isNone then
return { ctx }
else
/-
syntax simpPre := "↓"
syntax simpPost := "↑"
syntax simpLemma := (simpPre <|> simpPost)? term
syntax simpErase := "-" ident
-/
withMainContext do
let mut lemmas := ctx.simpLemmas
let mut starArg := false
for arg in stx[1].getSepArgs do
if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Tactic.simpErase then
if eraseLocal && (← Term.isLocalIdent? arg[1]).isSome then
-- We use `eraseCore` because the simp lemma for the hypothesis was not added yet
lemmas ← lemmas.eraseCore arg[1].getId
else
let declName ← resolveGlobalConstNoOverloadWithInfo arg[1]
lemmas ← lemmas.erase declName
else if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Tactic.simpLemma then
let post :=
if arg[0].isNone then
true
else
arg[0][0].getKind == ``Parser.Tactic.simpPost
let inv := !arg[1].isNone
let term := arg[2]
match (← resolveSimpIdLemma? term) with
| some e => lemmas ← addDeclToUnfoldOrLemma lemmas e post inv
| _ => lemmas ← addSimpLemma lemmas term post inv
else if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Tactic.simpStar then
starArg := true
else
throwUnsupportedSyntax
return { ctx := { ctx with simpLemmas := lemmas }, starArg }
where
resolveSimpIdLemma? (simpArgTerm : Syntax) : TacticM (Option Expr) := do
if simpArgTerm.isIdent then
try
Term.resolveId? simpArgTerm (withInfo := true)
catch _ =>
return none
else
Term.elabCDotFunctionAlias? simpArgTerm
abbrev FVarIdToLemmaId := NameMap Name
-- TODO: move?
private def getPropHyps : MetaM (Array FVarId) := do
let mut result := #[]
for localDecl in (← getLCtx) do
unless localDecl.isAuxDecl do
if (← isProp localDecl.type) then
result := result.push localDecl.fvarId
return result
structure MkSimpContextResult where
ctx : Simp.Context
fvarIdToLemmaId : FVarIdToLemmaId
-- If `ctx == false`, the argument is assumed to have type `Meta.Simp.Config`, and `Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx` otherwise. -/
private def mkSimpContext (stx : Syntax) (eraseLocal : Bool) (ctx := false) (ignoreStarArg : Bool := false) : TacticM MkSimpContextResult := do
let simpOnly := !stx[2].isNone
let r ← elabSimpArgs stx[3] (eraseLocal := eraseLocal) {
config := (← elabSimpConfig stx[1] (ctx := ctx))
simpLemmas := if simpOnly then {} else (← getSimpLemmas)
congrLemmas := (← getCongrLemmas)
}
if !r.starArg || ignoreStarArg then
return { r with fvarIdToLemmaId := {} }
else
let ctx := r.ctx
let erased := ctx.simpLemmas.erased
let hs ← getPropHyps
let mut ctx := ctx
let mut fvarIdToLemmaId := {}
for h in hs do
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl h
unless erased.contains localDecl.userName do
let fvarId := localDecl.fvarId
let proof := localDecl.toExpr
let id ← mkFreshUserName `h
fvarIdToLemmaId := fvarIdToLemmaId.insert fvarId id
let simpLemmas ← ctx.simpLemmas.add #[] proof (name? := id)
ctx := { ctx with simpLemmas }
return { ctx, fvarIdToLemmaId }
/-
"simp " ("(" "config" ":=" term ")")? ("only ")? ("[" simpLemma,* "]")? (location)?
-/
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.simp] def evalSimp : Tactic := fun stx => do
let { ctx, fvarIdToLemmaId } ← mkSimpContext stx (eraseLocal := false)
-- trace[Meta.debug] "Lemmas {← toMessageData ctx.simpLemmas.post}"
let loc := expandOptLocation stx[4]
match loc with
| Location.targets hUserNames simplifyTarget =>
withMainContext do
let fvarIds ← hUserNames.mapM fun hUserName => return (← getLocalDeclFromUserName hUserName).fvarId
go ctx fvarIds simplifyTarget fvarIdToLemmaId
| Location.wildcard =>
withMainContext do
go ctx (← getNondepPropHyps (← getMainGoal)) (simplifyTarget := true) fvarIdToLemmaId
where
go (ctx : Simp.Context) (fvarIdsToSimp : Array FVarId) (simplifyTarget : Bool) (fvarIdToLemmaId : FVarIdToLemmaId) : TacticM Unit := do
liftMetaTactic1 fun mvarId =>
return (← simpGoal mvarId ctx (simplifyTarget := simplifyTarget) (fvarIdsToSimp := fvarIdsToSimp) (fvarIdToLemmaId := fvarIdToLemmaId)).map (·.2)
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.simpAll] def evalSimpAll : Tactic := fun stx => do
let { ctx, .. } ← mkSimpContext stx (eraseLocal := true) (ctx := true) (ignoreStarArg := true)
match (← simpAll (← getMainGoal) ctx) with
| none => replaceMainGoal []
| some mvarId => replaceMainGoal [mvarId]
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
027ec436ab4400ffe54cb470a515bab99a31b8dd | d436468d80b739ba7e06843c4d0d2070e43448e5 | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_ring.lean | dfd5fb95fea3550ca27664df31b007cc79117973 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | roro47/mathlib | 761fdc002aef92f77818f3fef06bf6ec6fc1a28e | 80aa7d52537571a2ca62a3fdf71c9533a09422cf | refs/heads/master | 1,599,656,410,625 | 1,573,649,488,000 | 1,573,649,488,000 | 221,452,951 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,573,647,693,000 | 1,573,647,692,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,519 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Theory of topological rings with uniform structure.
-/
import topology.algebra.group_completion topology.algebra.ring
open classical set lattice filter topological_space add_comm_group
open_locale classical
noncomputable theory
namespace uniform_space.completion
open dense_inducing uniform_space function
variables (α : Type*) [ring α] [uniform_space α]
instance : has_one (completion α) := ⟨(1:α)⟩
instance : has_mul (completion α) :=
⟨curry $ (dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend (coe ∘ uncurry' (*))⟩
@[elim_cast]
lemma coe_one : ((1 : α) : completion α) = 1 := rfl
variables {α} [topological_ring α]
@[move_cast]
lemma coe_mul (a b : α) : ((a * b : α) : completion α) = a * b :=
((dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend_eq_of_cont
((continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul') (a, b)).symm
variables [uniform_add_group α]
lemma continuous_mul' : continuous (λ p : completion α × completion α, p.1 * p.2) :=
begin
haveI : is_Z_bilin ((coe ∘ uncurry' (*)) : α × α → completion α) :=
{ add_left := begin
introv,
change coe ((a + a')*b) = coe (a*b) + coe (a'*b),
rw_mod_cast add_mul
end,
add_right := begin
introv,
change coe (a*(b + b')) = coe (a*b) + coe (a*b'),
rw_mod_cast mul_add
end },
have : continuous ((coe ∘ uncurry' (*)) : α × α → completion α),
from (continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul',
convert dense_inducing_coe.extend_Z_bilin dense_inducing_coe this,
simp only [(*), curry, prod.mk.eta]
end
lemma continuous_mul {β : Type*} [topological_space β] {f g : β → completion α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, f b * g b) :=
continuous_mul'.comp (continuous.prod_mk hf hg)
instance : ring (completion α) :=
{ one_mul := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous_mul continuous_const continuous_id) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, one_mul]),
mul_one := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous_mul continuous_id continuous_const) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, mul_one]),
mul_assoc := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_mul (continuous_mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_mul continuous_fst
(continuous_mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_assoc]),
left_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_mul continuous_fst (continuous_add
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)))
(continuous_add
(continuous_mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, mul_add]),
right_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_mul (continuous_add continuous_fst
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_add
(continuous_mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, add_mul]),
..completion.add_comm_group, ..completion.has_mul α, ..completion.has_one α }
instance is_ring_hom_coe : is_ring_hom (coe : α → completion α) :=
⟨coe_one α, assume a b, coe_mul a b, assume a b, coe_add a b⟩
universes u
variables {β : Type u} [uniform_space β] [ring β] [uniform_add_group β] [topological_ring β]
{f : α → β} [is_ring_hom f] (hf : continuous f)
instance is_ring_hom_extension [complete_space β] [separated β] :
is_ring_hom (completion.extension f) :=
have hf : uniform_continuous f, from uniform_continuous_of_continuous hf,
{ map_one := by rw [← coe_one, extension_coe hf, is_ring_hom.map_one f],
map_add := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_add')
(continuous_add (continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst)
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_add, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf,
is_add_hom.map_add f]),
map_mul := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_mul')
(_root_.continuous_mul (continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst)
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_mul, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, is_ring_hom.map_mul f]) }
instance top_ring_compl : topological_ring (completion α) :=
{ continuous_add := continuous_add',
continuous_mul := continuous_mul',
continuous_neg := continuous_neg' }
instance is_ring_hom_map : is_ring_hom (completion.map f) :=
(completion.is_ring_hom_extension $ (continuous_coe β).comp hf : _)
variables (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] [uniform_space R] [uniform_add_group R] [topological_ring R]
instance : comm_ring (completion R) :=
{ mul_comm := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq (continuous_mul continuous_fst continuous_snd)
(continuous_mul continuous_snd continuous_fst))
(assume a b, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_comm]),
..completion.ring }
end uniform_space.completion
namespace uniform_space
variables {α : Type*}
lemma ring_sep_rel (α) [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
separation_setoid α = submodule.quotient_rel (ideal.closure ⊥) :=
setoid.ext $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
lemma ring_sep_quot (α) [r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) = (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
by rw [@ring_sep_rel α r]; refl
def sep_quot_equiv_ring_quot (α)
[r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) ≃ (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
quotient.congr_right $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
/- TODO: use a form of transport a.k.a. lift definition a.k.a. transfer -/
instance [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
comm_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
by rw ring_sep_quot α; apply_instance
instance [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
topological_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
begin
convert topological_ring_quotient (⊥ : ideal α).closure,
{ apply ring_sep_rel },
{ dsimp [topological_ring_quotient_topology, quotient.topological_space, to_topological_space],
congr,
apply ring_sep_rel,
apply ring_sep_rel },
{ apply ring_sep_rel },
{ simp [uniform_space.comm_ring] },
end
end uniform_space
|
2388421e0088149fd64182ea7d9a00c14ce02352 | f3849be5d845a1cb97680f0bbbe03b85518312f0 | /library/tools/super/utils.lean | 94cbb6f0d07666a481884350e4627e995c373da5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bjoeris/lean | 0ed95125d762b17bfcb54dad1f9721f953f92eeb | 4e496b78d5e73545fa4f9a807155113d8e6b0561 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,251,218,281 | 1,495,337,658,000 | 1,495,337,658,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,833 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner
-/
open tactic expr list
meta def get_metas : expr → list expr
| (var _) := []
| (sort _) := []
| (const _ _) := []
| (mvar n t) := expr.mvar n t :: get_metas t
| (local_const _ _ _ t) := get_metas t
| (app a b) := get_metas a ++ get_metas b
| (lam _ _ d b) := get_metas d ++ get_metas b
| (pi _ _ d b) := get_metas d ++ get_metas b
| (elet _ t v b) := get_metas t ++ get_metas v ++ get_metas b
| (macro _ _) := []
meta def get_meta_type : expr → expr
| (mvar _ t) := t
| _ := mk_var 0
-- TODO(gabriel): think about how to handle the avalanche of implicit arguments
meta def expr_size : expr → nat
| (var _) := 1
| (sort _) := 1
| (const _ _) := 1
| (mvar n t) := 1
| (local_const _ _ _ _) := 1
| (app a b) := expr_size a + expr_size b
| (lam _ _ d b) := 1 + expr_size b
| (pi _ _ d b) := 1 + expr_size b
| (elet _ t v b) := 1 + expr_size v + expr_size b
| (macro _ _) := 1
namespace ordering
def is_lt {A} [has_ordering A] (x y : A) : bool :=
match has_ordering.cmp x y with ordering.lt := tt | _ := ff end
end ordering
namespace list
meta def nub {A} [has_ordering A] (l : list A) : list A :=
rb_map.keys (rb_map.set_of_list l)
meta def nub_on {A B} [has_ordering B] (f : A → B) (l : list A) : list A :=
rb_map.values (rb_map.of_list (map (λx, (f x, x)) l))
def nub_on' {A B} [decidable_eq B] (f : A → B) : list A → list A
| [] := []
| (x::xs) := x :: filter (λy, f x ≠ f y) (nub_on' xs)
def for_all {A} (l : list A) (p : A → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : bool :=
list.all l (λx, to_bool (p x))
def exists_ {A} (l : list A) (p : A → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : bool :=
list.any l (λx, to_bool (p x))
def subset_of {A} [decidable_eq A] (xs ys : list A) :=
xs.for_all (λx, x ∈ ys)
def filter_maximal {A} (gt : A → A → bool) (l : list A) : list A :=
filter (λx, l.for_all (λy, ¬gt y x)) l
private def zip_with_index' {A} : ℕ → list A → list (A × ℕ)
| _ nil := nil
| i (x::xs) := (x,i) :: zip_with_index' (i+1) xs
def zip_with_index {A} : list A → list (A × ℕ) :=
zip_with_index' 0
meta def merge_sorted {A} [has_ordering A] : list A → list A → list A
| [] ys := ys
| xs [] := xs
| (x::xs) (y::ys) :=
if ordering.is_lt x y then
x :: merge_sorted xs (y::ys)
else
y :: merge_sorted (x::xs) ys
meta def sort {A} [has_ordering A] : list A → list A
| (x::xs) :=
let (smaller, greater_eq) := partition (λy, ordering.is_lt y x) xs in
merge_sorted (sort smaller) (x :: sort greater_eq)
| [] := []
meta def sort_on {A B} (f : A → B) [has_ordering B] : list A → list A :=
@sort _ ⟨λx y, has_ordering.cmp (f x) (f y)⟩
end list
meta def name_of_funsym : expr → name
| (local_const uniq _ _ _) := uniq
| (const n _) := n
| _ := name.anonymous
private meta def contained_funsyms' : expr → rb_map name expr → rb_map name expr
| (var _) m := m
| (sort _) m := m
| (const n ls) m := rb_map.insert m n (const n ls)
| (mvar _ t) m := contained_funsyms' t m
| (local_const uniq pp bi t) m := rb_map.insert m uniq (local_const uniq pp bi t)
| (app a b) m := contained_funsyms' a (contained_funsyms' b m)
| (lam _ _ d b) m := contained_funsyms' d (contained_funsyms' b m)
| (pi _ _ d b) m := contained_funsyms' d (contained_funsyms' b m)
| (elet _ t v b) m := contained_funsyms' t (contained_funsyms' v (contained_funsyms' b m))
| (macro _ _) m := m
meta def contained_funsyms (e : expr) : rb_map name expr :=
contained_funsyms' e (rb_map.mk name expr)
private meta def contained_lconsts' : expr → rb_map name expr → rb_map name expr
| (var _) m := m
| (sort _) m := m
| (const _ _) m := m
| (mvar _ t) m := contained_lconsts' t m
| (local_const uniq pp bi t) m := contained_lconsts' t (rb_map.insert m uniq (local_const uniq pp bi t))
| (app a b) m := contained_lconsts' a (contained_lconsts' b m)
| (lam _ _ d b) m := contained_lconsts' d (contained_lconsts' b m)
| (pi _ _ d b) m := contained_lconsts' d (contained_lconsts' b m)
| (elet _ t v b) m := contained_lconsts' t (contained_lconsts' v (contained_lconsts' b m))
| (macro _ _) m := m
meta def contained_lconsts (e : expr) : rb_map name expr :=
contained_lconsts' e (rb_map.mk name expr)
meta def contained_lconsts_list (es : list expr) : rb_map name expr :=
es.foldl (λlcs e, contained_lconsts' e lcs) (rb_map.mk name expr)
namespace tactic
meta def infer_univ (type : expr) : tactic level :=
do sort_of_type ← infer_type type >>= whnf,
match sort_of_type with
| sort lvl := return lvl
| not_sort := do fmt ← pp not_sort,
fail $ to_fmt "cannot get universe level of sort: " ++ fmt
end
end tactic
namespace nat
def min (m n : ℕ) := if m < n then m else n
def max (m n : ℕ) := if m > n then m else n
end nat
|
2dfd4ea0058c1b7bcba99ca44f59a14a28ec0f0b | b6f0d4562078d09b2d51c6aa5216cf0e07e8090f | /LeanRanges.lean | 846661ae221a28c9d805a00a59f3a1eb2d99244b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pnwamk/lean4-ranges | 206a46e0ded663f546927f598549efacc36492f2 | 6c6a7e21edc1c2ad319749b75a222d77b1340f7d | refs/heads/master | 1,680,233,414,507 | 1,617,384,186,000 | 1,617,384,186,000 | 349,486,531 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,878 | lean | import AssertCmd
import LeanRanges.ToRange
import LeanRanges.NatRange
import LeanRanges.IntRange
import LeanRanges.FinRange
import LeanRanges.UInt8Range
#check [0⋯5]
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- Nat
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
#assert [⋯(4:Nat)].toArray == #[0,1,2,3]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯4].toArray == #[0,1,2,3]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat)].toArray == #[0,1,2,3,4]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯=4].toArray == #[0,1,2,3,4]
#assert [⋯(4:Nat); -1].toArray == #[3,2,1,0]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯4; -1].toArray == #[3,2,1,0]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat); -1].toArray == #[4,3,2,1,0]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯=4; -1].toArray == #[4,3,2,1,0]
#assert [⋯(4:Nat); 2].toArray == #[0,2]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯4; 2].toArray == #[0,2]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat); 2].toArray == #[0,2,4]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯=4; 2].toArray == #[0,2,4]
#assert [(1:Nat)⋯4; 2].toArray == #[1,3]
#assert [(1:Nat)⋯=4; 2].toArray == #[1,3]
#assert [⋯(4:Nat); 3].toArray == #[0,3]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯4; 3].toArray == #[0,3]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat); 3].toArray == #[0,3]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯=4; 3].toArray == #[0,3]
#assert [⋯(4:Nat); 4].toArray == #[0]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯4; 4].toArray == #[0]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat); 4].toArray == #[0,4]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯=4; 4].toArray == #[0,4]
#assert [⋯(4:Nat); -4].toArray == #[0]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯4; -4].toArray == #[0]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat); -4].toArray == #[4,0]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯=4; -4].toArray == #[4,0]
#assert [⋯(4:Nat); 5].toArray == #[0]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯4; 5].toArray == #[0]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat); 5].toArray == #[0]
#assert [(0:Nat)⋯=4; 5].toArray == #[0]
#assert [⋯(4:Nat); 0].toArray == #[]
#assert [⋯=(4:Nat); 0].toArray == #[]
#assert [(4:Nat)⋯0].toArray == #[]
#assert [(4:Nat)⋯=0].toArray == #[]
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- Int
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯3].toArray == #[-2,-1,0,1,2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯=3].toArray == #[-2,-1,0,1,2,3]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯3; 2].toArray == #[-2, 0, 2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯4; 2].toArray == #[-2, 0, 2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯=3; 2].toArray == #[-2, 0, 2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯=4; 2].toArray == #[-2, 0, 2, 4]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯3; -1].toArray == #[2, 1, 0, -1, -2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯=3; -1].toArray == #[3, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯3; -2].toArray == #[2, 0, -2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯4; -2].toArray == #[2, 0, -2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯=3; -2].toArray == #[2, 0, -2]
#assert [(-2:Int)⋯=4; -2].toArray == #[4, 2, 0, -2]
#assert [0⋯(4:Int); 0].toArray == #[]
#assert [0⋯=(4:Int); 0].toArray == #[]
#assert [(4:Int)⋯0].toArray == #[]
#assert [(4:Int)⋯=0].toArray == #[]
#assert [(-4:Int)⋯=-5].toArray == #[]
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- Fin
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
#assert [(0:Fin 6)⋯4].toArray == (#[0,1,2,3] : Array (Fin 6))
#assert [(0:Fin 6)⋯=4].toArray == (#[0,1,2,3,4] : Array (Fin 6))
#assert (Fin.range 0 4).toArray == (#[0,1,2,3] : Array (Fin 4))
#assert (Fin.rangeEq 0 4).toArray == (#[0,1,2,3,4] : Array (Fin 5))
#assert [(0:Fin 6)⋯4; 2].toArray == (#[0,2] : Array (Fin 6))
#assert [(0:Fin 6)⋯=4; 2].toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array (Fin 6))
#assert [(0:Fin 256)⋯5; 2].toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array (Fin 256))
#assert [(0:Fin 256)⋯=5; 2].toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array (Fin 256))
#assert (Fin.range (n := 3) 0 5).toArray == (#[0,1,2]: Array (Fin 3))
#assert (Fin.range (n := 5) 0 5).toArray == (#[0,1,2,3,4]: Array (Fin 5))
#assert (Fin.range (n := 10) 0 5).toArray == (#[0,1,2,3,4]: Array (Fin 10))
#assert (Fin.range 0 4 2).toArray == (#[0,2]: Array (Fin 4))
#assert (Fin.range (n := 10) 0 4 2).toArray == (#[0,2]: Array (Fin 10))
#assert (Fin.rangeEq 0 4 2).toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array (Fin 5))
#assert (Fin.range 0 5 2).toArray == (#[0,2,4]: Array (Fin 5))
#assert (Fin.rangeEq 0 5 2).toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array (Fin 6))
#assert (Fin.rangeEq (n := 3) 0 5 2).toArray == (#[0,2] : Array (Fin 3))
#assert (Fin.rangeEq (n := 5) 0 5 2).toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array (Fin 5))
#assert (Fin.rangeEq (n := 10) 0 5 2).toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array (Fin 10))
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- UInt8
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯5].toArray == (#[0,1,2,3,4] : Array UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯=5].toArray == (#[0,1,2,3,4,5] : Array UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯255].toArray.size == 255
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯255].toArray.get! 0) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯255].toArray.get! 254) == (254 : UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯=255].toArray.size == 256
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255].toArray.get! 0) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255].toArray.get! 255) == (255 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255; -1].toArray.get! 0) == (255 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255; -1].toArray.get! 255) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯5; 2].toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯=5; 2].toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯6; 2].toArray == (#[0,2,4] : Array UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯=6; 2].toArray == (#[0,2,4,6] : Array UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯255; 2].toArray.size == 128
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯254; 2].toArray.size == 127
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯255; 2].toArray.get! 0) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯255; 2].toArray.get! 127) == (254 : UInt8)
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯=255; 2].toArray.size == 128
#assert [(0:UInt8)⋯=254; 2].toArray.size == 128
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255; 2].toArray.get! 0) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255; 2].toArray.get! 0) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=254; 2].toArray.get! 0) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255; 2].toArray.get! 127) == (254 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=254; 2].toArray.get! 127) == (254 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=255; -2].toArray.get! 127) == (0 : UInt8)
#assert ([(0:UInt8)⋯=254; -2].toArray.get! 127) == (0 : UInt8)
|
ea387da6397e7430db7b91c21381a5f819317fbe | f4bff2062c030df03d65e8b69c88f79b63a359d8 | /src/game/order/level03.lean | e4746853dd211215fedca20f68e8f01fee7e6587 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | adastra7470/real-number-game | 776606961f52db0eb824555ed2f8e16f92216ea3 | f9dcb7d9255a79b57e62038228a23346c2dc301b | refs/heads/master | 1,669,221,575,893 | 1,594,669,800,000 | 1,594,669,800,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,172 | lean | import game.order.level02
namespace xena -- hide
/-
# Chapter 2 : Order
## Level 3
Another property of the absolute value.
-/
notation `|` x `|` := abs x --hide
/- Lemma
For any two real numbers $a$ and $b$, we have that
$$|a| ≤ c ↔ -c ≤ a ≤ c$$.
-/
theorem abs_le (a c : ℝ) (h : 0 ≤ c): |a| ≤ c ↔ (-c) ≤ a ∧ a ≤ c :=
begin
split,
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with haNeg | haZero | haPos,
{ -- case a < 0
intro H,
have h1 : | a | = - a, exact abs_of_neg haNeg,
rw h1 at H, split, linarith, linarith,
},
{ -- case a = 0
intro H, rw haZero, split, linarith, exact h,
},
{ -- case 0 < a
intro H,
have h1 : |a| = a, exact abs_of_pos haPos,
rw h1 at H, split, linarith, exact H,
},
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with haNeg | haZero | haPos,
{ -- case a < 0
intro H,
have h1 : | a | = - a, exact abs_of_neg haNeg,
rw abs_le,
exact H,
},
{ -- case a = 0
intro H,
rw abs_le, exact H,
},
{ -- case 0 < a
intro H,
rw abs_le, exact H,
},
done
end
end xena --hide
|
2c48637d1651e6428809c2b123dc78174f2a7977 | 94637389e03c919023691dcd05bd4411b1034aa5 | /src/inClassNotes/final/bool_expr.lean | 595d7fa3004cdafdd3ce5140ff08dbd8a551f4a3 | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/complogic-s21 | 7c4eef2105abad899e46502270d9829d913e8afc | 99039501b770248c8ceb39890be5dfe129dc1082 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,985,669,944 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 335,706,272 | 0 | 38 | null | 1,618,325,669,000 | 1,612,374,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,195 | lean | import .env
import .arith_expr
/-
inductive bool_var : Type
| mk (n : nat)
-/
abbreviation bool_var := var bool
/-
Abstract syntax
-/
inductive bool_expr : Type
| lit_expr : bool → bool_expr
| var_expr : bool_var → bool_expr
| and_expr : bool_expr → bool_expr → bool_expr
| or_expr : bool_expr → bool_expr → bool_expr
| impl_expr : bool_expr → bool_expr → bool_expr
| not_expr : bool_expr → bool_expr
| le_expr : arith_expr → arith_expr -> bool_expr
| eq_expr : arith_expr → arith_expr -> bool_expr
open bool_expr
/-
Concrete syntax
-/
notation e1 ∧ e2 := and_expr e1 e2
notation e1 ∨ e2 := or_expr e1 e2
notation ¬e := not_expr e
notation `[` b `]` := lit_expr b
notation `[` v `]` := var_expr v
reserve infixr `=>`:67
notation e1 => e2 := impl_expr e1 e2
notation a1 <= a2 := le_expr a1 a2
notation a1 == a2 := eq_expr a1 a2
/-
Semantics
-/
-- Boolean implies function, not provided by Lean
def bimp : bool → bool → bool
| tt ff := ff
| _ _ := tt
def eql : ℕ → ℕ → bool
| 0 0 := tt
| 0 _ := ff
| _ 0 := ff
| (n'+1) (m'+1) := eq n' m'
def le : ℕ → ℕ → bool
| 0 _ := tt
| _ 0 := ff
| (n'+1) (m'+1) := le n' m'
--def bool_eval : bool_expr → (bool_var → bool) → bool
def bool_eval : bool_expr → env → bool
| (lit_expr b) _ := b
| (var_expr v) st := st.bool_var_interp v
| (and_expr e1 e2) st := band (bool_eval e1 st) (bool_eval e2 st)
| (or_expr e1 e2) st := bor (bool_eval e1 st) (bool_eval e2 st)
| (impl_expr e1 e2) st := bimp (bool_eval e1 st) (bool_eval e2 st)
| (not_expr e) st := bnot (bool_eval e st)
-- New
| (le_expr a1 a2) st := le (arith_expr_eval st a1) (arith_expr_eval st a2)
| (eq_expr a1 a2) st := eql (arith_expr_eval st a1) (arith_expr_eval st a2)
-- Provide initial values/interpretation for variables of type (var nat)
instance : has_var bool := ⟨ λ (v : var bool), ff ⟩
-- Override the value of a Boolean variable, returning an updated env
def override_bool : env → var bool → bool_expr → env
| (env.mk bi ni) v expr :=
⟨
λ (v' : var bool),
if (var_eq v v')
then (bool_eval expr (env.mk bi ni))
else (bi v'),
ni
⟩
|
ed8640c14b8fc3031afd948056500dcfbbf16ad7 | ac2987d8c7832fb4a87edb6bee26141facbb6fa0 | /Mathlib/Tactic/PrintPrefix.lean | f4db38b5d67b6fa263270f8d7cf2de238035289b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AurelienSaue/mathlib4 | 52204b9bd9d207c922fe0cf3397166728bb6c2e2 | 84271fe0875bafdaa88ac41f1b5a7c18151bd0d5 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,156,096,545 | 1,629,378,840,000 | 1,629,378,840,000 | 389,648,603 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,627,307,284,000 | 1,627,307,284,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,882 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Shing Tak Lam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shing Tak Lam, Daniel Selsam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Lean.Elab.Command
open Lean Meta Elab Command
namespace Lean
namespace Meta
deriving instance Inhabited for ConstantInfo -- required for Array.qsort
structure FindOptions where
stage1 : Bool := true
checkPrivate : Bool := false
def findCore (ϕ : ConstantInfo → MetaM Bool) (opts : FindOptions := {}) :
MetaM (Array ConstantInfo) := do
let matches_ ← if !opts.stage1 then #[] else (← getEnv).constants.map₁.foldM (init := #[]) check
(← getEnv).constants.map₂.foldlM (init := matches_) check
where
check matches_ name cinfo := do
if opts.checkPrivate || !isPrivateName name then
if ← ϕ cinfo then matches_.push cinfo else matches_
else matches_
def find (msg : String)
(ϕ : ConstantInfo → MetaM Bool) (opts : FindOptions := {}) : TermElabM String := do
let cinfos ← findCore ϕ opts
let cinfos := cinfos.qsort fun p q => p.name.lt q.name
let mut msg := msg
for cinfo in cinfos do
msg := msg ++ s!"{cinfo.name} : {← Meta.ppExpr cinfo.type}\n"
msg
end Meta
namespace Elab.Command
syntax (name := printPrefix) "#print prefix " ident : command
/--
The command `#print prefix foo` will print all definitions that start with
the namespace `foo`.
-/
@[commandElab printPrefix] def elabPrintPrefix : CommandElab
| `(#print prefix%$tk $name:ident) => do
let nameId := name.getId
liftTermElabM none do
let mut msg ← find "" fun cinfo => nameId.isPrefixOf cinfo.name
if msg.isEmpty then
if let [name] ← resolveGlobalConst name then
msg ← find msg fun cinfo => name.isPrefixOf cinfo.name
if !msg.isEmpty then
logInfoAt tk msg
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
end Elab.Command
end Lean
|
de0064a1805b26dc01fd213c62451066ea93564c | 26ac254ecb57ffcb886ff709cf018390161a9225 | /src/data/dfinsupp.lean | df9a254aa8d14f2ef53c130fb47c34841f1019df | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/mathlib | 42842584f584359bbe1fc8b88b3ff937c8acd72d | d0df6b81cd0920ad569158c06a3fd5abb9e63301 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,546,404,255 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 281,173,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,263,582,000 | 1,595,263,581,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,976 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.pi_instances
/-!
# Dependent functions with finite support
For a non-dependent version see `data/finsupp.lean`.
-/
universes u u₁ u₂ v v₁ v₂ v₃ w x y l
open_locale big_operators
variables (ι : Type u) (β : ι → Type v)
namespace dfinsupp
variable [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
structure pre : Type (max u v) :=
(to_fun : Π i, β i)
(pre_support : multiset ι)
(zero : ∀ i, i ∈ pre_support ∨ to_fun i = 0)
instance inhabited_pre : inhabited (pre ι β) :=
⟨⟨λ i, 0, ∅, λ i, or.inr rfl⟩⟩
instance : setoid (pre ι β) :=
{ r := λ x y, ∀ i, x.to_fun i = y.to_fun i,
iseqv := ⟨λ f i, rfl, λ f g H i, (H i).symm,
λ f g h H1 H2 i, (H1 i).trans (H2 i)⟩ }
end dfinsupp
variable {ι}
/-- A dependent function `Π i, β i` with finite support. -/
@[reducible]
def dfinsupp [Π i, has_zero (β i)] : Type* :=
quotient (dfinsupp.setoid ι β)
variable {β}
notation `Π₀` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, dfinsupp f) := r
infix ` →ₚ `:25 := dfinsupp
namespace dfinsupp
section basic
variables [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
variables {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
variables [Π i, has_zero (β₁ i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₂ i)]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨λ _, Π i, β i, λ f, quotient.lift_on f pre.to_fun $ λ _ _, funext⟩
instance : has_zero (Π₀ i, β i) := ⟨⟦⟨λ i, 0, ∅, λ i, or.inr rfl⟩⟧⟩
instance : inhabited (Π₀ i, β i) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply {i : ι} : (0 : Π₀ i, β i) i = 0 := rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {f g : Π₀ i, β i} (H : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
quotient.induction_on₂ f g (λ _ _ H, quotient.sound H) H
/-- The composition of `f : β₁ → β₂` and `g : Π₀ i, β₁ i` is
`map_range f hf g : Π₀ i, β₂ i`, well defined when `f 0 = 0`. -/
def map_range (f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i, β₁ i) : Π₀ i, β₂ i :=
quotient.lift_on g (λ x, ⟦(⟨λ i, f i (x.1 i), x.2,
λ i, or.cases_on (x.3 i) or.inl $ λ H, or.inr $ by rw [H, hf]⟩ : pre ι β₂)⟧) $ λ x y H,
quotient.sound $ λ i, by simp only [H i]
@[simp] lemma map_range_apply
{f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {g : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {i : ι} :
map_range f hf g i = f i (g i) :=
quotient.induction_on g $ λ x, rfl
/-- Let `f i` be a binary operation `β₁ i → β₂ i → β i` such that `f i 0 0 = 0`.
Then `zip_with f hf` is a binary operation `Π₀ i, β₁ i → Π₀ i, β₂ i → Π₀ i, β i`. -/
def zip_with (f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0)
(g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) : (Π₀ i, β i) :=
begin
refine quotient.lift_on₂ g₁ g₂ (λ x y, ⟦(⟨λ i, f i (x.1 i) (y.1 i), x.2 + y.2,
λ i, _⟩ : pre ι β)⟧) _,
{ cases x.3 i with h1 h1,
{ left, rw multiset.mem_add, left, exact h1 },
cases y.3 i with h2 h2,
{ left, rw multiset.mem_add, right, exact h2 },
right, rw [h1, h2, hf] },
exact λ x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ H1 H2, quotient.sound $ λ i, by simp only [H1 i, H2 i]
end
@[simp] lemma zip_with_apply
{f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i} {i : ι} :
zip_with f hf g₁ g₂ i = f i (g₁ i) (g₂ i) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ g₁ g₂ $ λ _ _, rfl
end basic
section algebra
instance [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] : has_add (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨zip_with (λ _, (+)) (λ _, add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] {g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i} {i : ι} :
(g₁ + g₂) i = g₁ i + g₂ i :=
zip_with_apply
instance [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] : add_monoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_monoid .
zero := 0,
add := (+),
add_assoc := λ f g h, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, add_assoc],
zero_add := λ f, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, zero_apply, zero_add],
add_zero := λ f, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, zero_apply, add_zero] }
instance [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] {i : ι} : is_add_monoid_hom (λ g : Π₀ i : ι, β i, g i) :=
{ map_add := λ _ _, add_apply, map_zero := zero_apply }
instance [Π i, add_group (β i)] : has_neg (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨λ f, f.map_range (λ _, has_neg.neg) (λ _, neg_zero)⟩
instance [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] : add_comm_monoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_comm := λ f g, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, add_comm],
.. dfinsupp.add_monoid }
@[simp] lemma neg_apply [Π i, add_group (β i)] {g : Π₀ i, β i} {i : ι} : (- g) i = - g i :=
map_range_apply
instance [Π i, add_group (β i)] : add_group (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_left_neg := λ f, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, neg_apply, zero_apply, add_left_neg],
.. dfinsupp.add_monoid,
.. (infer_instance : has_neg (Π₀ i, β i)) }
@[simp] lemma sub_apply [Π i, add_group (β i)] {g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i} {i : ι} :
(g₁ - g₂) i = g₁ i - g₂ i :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
instance [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] : add_comm_group (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_comm := λ f g, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, add_comm],
..dfinsupp.add_group }
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a semiring action from an action on each
coordinate. -/
def to_has_scalar {γ : Type w} [semiring γ] [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] [Π i, semimodule γ (β i)] :
has_scalar γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨λc v, v.map_range (λ _, (•) c) (λ _, smul_zero _)⟩
local attribute [instance] to_has_scalar
@[simp] lemma smul_apply {γ : Type w} [semiring γ] [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)]
[Π i, semimodule γ (β i)] {i : ι} {b : γ} {v : Π₀ i, β i} :
(b • v) i = b • (v i) :=
map_range_apply
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a semimodule structure from such a structure on
each coordinate. -/
def to_semimodule {γ : Type w} [semiring γ] [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] [Π i, semimodule γ (β i)] :
semimodule γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
semimodule.of_core {
smul_add := λ c x y, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, smul_add],
add_smul := λ c x y, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, add_smul],
one_smul := λ x, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, one_smul],
mul_smul := λ r s x, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, smul_smul],
.. (infer_instance : has_scalar γ (Π₀ i, β i)) }
end algebra
section filter_and_subtype_domain
/-- `filter p f` is the function which is `f i` if `p i` is true and 0 otherwise. -/
def filter [Π i, has_zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, ⟦(⟨λ i, if p i then x.1 i else 0, x.2,
λ i, or.cases_on (x.3 i) or.inl $ λ H, or.inr $ by rw [H, if_t_t]⟩ : pre ι β)⟧) $ λ x y H,
quotient.sound $ λ i, by simp only [H i]
@[simp] lemma filter_apply [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {i : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
f.filter p i = if p i then f i else 0 :=
quotient.induction_on f $ λ x, rfl
lemma filter_apply_pos [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f : Π₀ i, β i} {i : ι} (h : p i) :
f.filter p i = f i :=
by simp only [filter_apply, if_pos h]
lemma filter_apply_neg [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f : Π₀ i, β i} {i : ι} (h : ¬ p i) :
f.filter p i = 0 :=
by simp only [filter_apply, if_neg h]
lemma filter_pos_add_filter_neg [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] {f : Π₀ i, β i}
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
f.filter p + f.filter (λi, ¬ p i) = f :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, filter_apply]; split_ifs; simp only [add_zero, zero_add]
/-- `subtype_domain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function
`f` to the subtype `p`. -/
def subtype_domain [Π i, has_zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i : subtype p, β i :=
begin
fapply quotient.lift_on f,
{ intro x,
refine ⟦⟨λ i, x.1 (i : ι),
(x.2.filter p).attach.map $ λ j, ⟨j, (multiset.mem_filter.1 j.2).2⟩, _⟩⟧,
refine λ i, or.cases_on (x.3 i) (λ H, _) or.inr,
left, rw multiset.mem_map, refine ⟨⟨i, multiset.mem_filter.2 ⟨H, i.2⟩⟩, _, subtype.eta _ _⟩,
apply multiset.mem_attach },
intros x y H,
exact quotient.sound (λ i, H i)
end
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_zero [Π i, has_zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
subtype_domain p (0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_apply [Π i, has_zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{i : subtype p} {v : Π₀ i, β i} :
(subtype_domain p v) i = v (i.val) :=
quotient.induction_on v $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_add [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{v v' : Π₀ i, β i} :
(v + v').subtype_domain p = v.subtype_domain p + v'.subtype_domain p :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, subtype_domain_apply]
instance subtype_domain.is_add_monoid_hom [Π i, add_monoid (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
is_add_monoid_hom (subtype_domain p : (Π₀ i : ι, β i) → Π₀ i : subtype p, β i) :=
{ map_add := λ _ _, subtype_domain_add, map_zero := subtype_domain_zero }
@[simp]
lemma subtype_domain_neg [Π i, add_group (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {v : Π₀ i, β i} :
(- v).subtype_domain p = - v.subtype_domain p :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [neg_apply, subtype_domain_apply]
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_sub [Π i, add_group (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{v v' : Π₀ i, β i} :
(v - v').subtype_domain p = v.subtype_domain p - v'.subtype_domain p :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [sub_apply, subtype_domain_apply]
end filter_and_subtype_domain
variable [dec : decidable_eq ι]
include dec
section basic
variable [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
omit dec
lemma finite_supp (f : Π₀ i, β i) : set.finite {i | f i ≠ 0} :=
begin
classical,
exact quotient.induction_on f (λ x, x.2.to_finset.finite_to_set.subset (λ i H,
multiset.mem_to_finset.2 ((x.3 i).resolve_right H)))
end
include dec
/-- Create an element of `Π₀ i, β i` from a finset `s` and a function `x`
defined on this `finset`. -/
def mk (s : finset ι) (x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β (i : ι)) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟦⟨λ i, if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0, s.1,
λ i, if H : i ∈ s then or.inl H else or.inr $ dif_neg H⟩⟧
@[simp] lemma mk_apply {s : finset ι} {x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i} {i : ι} :
(mk s x : Π i, β i) i = if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0 :=
rfl
theorem mk_injective (s : finset ι) : function.injective (@mk ι β _ _ s) :=
begin
intros x y H,
ext i,
have h1 : (mk s x : Π i, β i) i = (mk s y : Π i, β i) i, {rw H},
cases i with i hi,
change i ∈ s at hi,
dsimp only [mk_apply, subtype.coe_mk] at h1,
simpa only [dif_pos hi] using h1
end
/-- The function `single i b : Π₀ i, β i` sends `i` to `b`
and all other points to `0`. -/
def single (i : ι) (b : β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
mk {i} $ λ j, eq.rec_on (finset.mem_singleton.1 j.prop).symm b
@[simp] lemma single_apply {i i' b} :
(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = (if h : i = i' then eq.rec_on h b else 0) :=
begin
dsimp only [single],
by_cases h : i = i',
{ have h1 : i' ∈ ({i} : finset ι) := finset.mem_singleton.2 h.symm,
simp only [mk_apply, dif_pos h, dif_pos h1], refl },
{ have h1 : i' ∉ ({i} : finset ι) := finset.not_mem_singleton.2 (ne.symm h),
simp only [mk_apply, dif_neg h, dif_neg h1] }
end
@[simp] lemma single_zero {i} : (single i 0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
quotient.sound $ λ j, if H : j ∈ ({i} : finset _)
then by dsimp only; rw [dif_pos H]; cases finset.mem_singleton.1 H; refl
else dif_neg H
@[simp] lemma single_eq_same {i b} : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i = b :=
by simp only [single_apply, dif_pos rfl]
lemma single_eq_of_ne {i i' b} (h : i ≠ i') : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = 0 :=
by simp only [single_apply, dif_neg h]
/-- Redefine `f i` to be `0`. -/
def erase (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, ⟦(⟨λ j, if j = i then 0 else x.1 j, x.2,
λ j, or.cases_on (x.3 j) or.inl $ λ H, or.inr $ by simp only [H, if_t_t]⟩ : pre ι β)⟧) $ λ x y H,
quotient.sound $ λ j, if h : j = i then by simp only [if_pos h]
else by simp only [if_neg h, H j]
@[simp] lemma erase_apply {i j : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
(f.erase i) j = if j = i then 0 else f j :=
quotient.induction_on f $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma erase_same {i : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} : (f.erase i) i = 0 :=
by simp
lemma erase_ne {i i' : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} (h : i' ≠ i) : (f.erase i) i' = f i' :=
by simp [h]
end basic
section add_monoid
variable [Π i, add_monoid (β i)]
@[simp] lemma single_add {i : ι} {b₁ b₂ : β i} : single i (b₁ + b₂) = single i b₁ + single i b₂ :=
ext $ assume i',
begin
by_cases h : i = i',
{ subst h, simp only [add_apply, single_eq_same] },
{ simp only [add_apply, single_eq_of_ne h, zero_add] }
end
lemma single_add_erase {i : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} : single i (f i) + f.erase i = f :=
ext $ λ i',
if h : i = i'
then by subst h; simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_pos rfl, if_pos, add_zero]
else by simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_neg h, if_neg (ne.symm h), zero_add]
lemma erase_add_single {i : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} : f.erase i + single i (f i) = f :=
ext $ λ i',
if h : i = i'
then by subst h; simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_pos rfl, if_pos, zero_add]
else by simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_neg h, if_neg (ne.symm h), add_zero]
protected theorem induction {p : (Π₀ i, β i) → Prop} (f : Π₀ i, β i)
(h0 : p 0) (ha : ∀i b (f : Π₀ i, β i), f i = 0 → b ≠ 0 → p f → p (single i b + f)) :
p f :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
cases x with f s H, revert f H,
apply multiset.induction_on s,
{ intros f H, convert h0, ext i, exact (H i).resolve_left id },
intros i s ih f H,
by_cases H1 : i ∈ s,
{ have H2 : ∀ j, j ∈ s ∨ f j = 0,
{ intro j, cases H j with H2 H2,
{ cases multiset.mem_cons.1 H2 with H3 H3,
{ left, rw H3, exact H1 },
{ left, exact H3 } },
right, exact H2 },
have H3 : (⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := i :: s, zero := H}⟧ : Π₀ i, β i)
= ⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := s, zero := H2}⟧,
{ exact quotient.sound (λ i, rfl) },
rw H3, apply ih },
have H2 : p (erase i ⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := i :: s, zero := H}⟧),
{ dsimp only [erase, quotient.lift_on_beta],
have H2 : ∀ j, j ∈ s ∨ ite (j = i) 0 (f j) = 0,
{ intro j, cases H j with H2 H2,
{ cases multiset.mem_cons.1 H2 with H3 H3,
{ right, exact if_pos H3 },
{ left, exact H3 } },
right, split_ifs; [refl, exact H2] },
have H3 : (⟦{to_fun := λ (j : ι), ite (j = i) 0 (f j),
pre_support := i :: s, zero := _}⟧ : Π₀ i, β i)
= ⟦{to_fun := λ (j : ι), ite (j = i) 0 (f j), pre_support := s, zero := H2}⟧ :=
quotient.sound (λ i, rfl),
rw H3, apply ih },
have H3 : single i _ + _ = (⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := i :: s, zero := H}⟧ : Π₀ i, β i) :=
single_add_erase,
rw ← H3,
change p (single i (f i) + _),
cases classical.em (f i = 0) with h h,
{ rw [h, single_zero, zero_add], exact H2 },
refine ha _ _ _ _ h H2,
rw erase_same
end
lemma induction₂ {p : (Π₀ i, β i) → Prop} (f : Π₀ i, β i)
(h0 : p 0) (ha : ∀i b (f : Π₀ i, β i), f i = 0 → b ≠ 0 → p f → p (f + single i b)) :
p f :=
dfinsupp.induction f h0 $ λ i b f h1 h2 h3,
have h4 : f + single i b = single i b + f,
{ ext j, by_cases H : i = j,
{ subst H, simp [h1] },
{ simp [H] } },
eq.rec_on h4 $ ha i b f h1 h2 h3
end add_monoid
@[simp] lemma mk_add [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] {s : finset ι} {x y : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i} :
mk s (x + y) = mk s x + mk s y :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw zero_add]
@[simp] lemma mk_zero [Π i, has_zero (β i)] {s : finset ι} :
mk s (0 : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1) = 0 :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [mk_apply]; split_ifs; refl
@[simp] lemma mk_neg [Π i, add_group (β i)] {s : finset ι} {x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1} :
mk s (-x) = -mk s x :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [neg_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw neg_zero]
@[simp] lemma mk_sub [Π i, add_group (β i)] {s : finset ι} {x y : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1} :
mk s (x - y) = mk s x - mk s y :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [sub_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw sub_zero]
instance [Π i, add_group (β i)] {s : finset ι} : is_add_group_hom (@mk ι β _ _ s) :=
{ map_add := λ _ _, mk_add }
section
local attribute [instance] to_semimodule
variables (γ : Type w) [semiring γ] [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] [Π i, semimodule γ (β i)]
include γ
@[simp] lemma mk_smul {s : finset ι} {c : γ} (x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1) :
mk s (c • x) = c • mk s x :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw smul_zero]
@[simp] lemma single_smul {i : ι} {c : γ} {x : β i} :
single i (c • x) = c • single i x :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, single_apply]; split_ifs; [cases h, rw smul_zero]; refl
variable β
/-- `dfinsupp.mk` as a `linear_map`. -/
def lmk (s : finset ι) : (Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1) →ₗ[γ] Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨mk s, λ _ _, mk_add, λ c x, by rw [mk_smul γ x]⟩
/-- `dfinsupp.single` as a `linear_map` -/
def lsingle (i) : β i →ₗ[γ] Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨single i, λ _ _, single_add, λ _ _, single_smul _⟩
variable {β}
@[simp] lemma lmk_apply {s : finset ι} {x} : lmk β γ s x = mk s x := rfl
@[simp] lemma lsingle_apply {i : ι} {x : β i} : lsingle β γ i x = single i x := rfl
end
section support_basic
variables [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
/-- Set `{i | f x ≠ 0}` as a `finset`. -/
def support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : finset ι :=
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, x.2.to_finset.filter $ λ i, x.1 i ≠ 0) $
begin
intros x y Hxy,
ext i, split,
{ intro H,
rcases finset.mem_filter.1 H with ⟨h1, h2⟩,
rw Hxy i at h2,
exact finset.mem_filter.2 ⟨multiset.mem_to_finset.2 $ (y.3 i).resolve_right h2, h2⟩ },
{ intro H,
rcases finset.mem_filter.1 H with ⟨h1, h2⟩,
rw ← Hxy i at h2,
exact finset.mem_filter.2 ⟨multiset.mem_to_finset.2 $ (x.3 i).resolve_right h2, h2⟩ },
end
@[simp] theorem support_mk_subset {s : finset ι} {x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1} :
(mk s x).support ⊆ s :=
λ i H, multiset.mem_to_finset.1 (finset.mem_filter.1 H).1
@[simp] theorem mem_support_to_fun (f : Π₀ i, β i) (i) : i ∈ f.support ↔ f i ≠ 0 :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
dsimp only [support, quotient.lift_on_beta],
rw [finset.mem_filter, multiset.mem_to_finset],
exact and_iff_right_of_imp (x.3 i).resolve_right
end
theorem eq_mk_support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : f = mk f.support (λ i, f i) :=
begin
change f = mk f.support (λ i, f i.1),
ext i,
by_cases h : f i ≠ 0; [skip, rw [classical.not_not] at h];
simp [h]
end
@[simp] lemma support_zero : (0 : Π₀ i, β i).support = ∅ := rfl
lemma mem_support_iff (f : Π₀ i, β i) : ∀i:ι, i ∈ f.support ↔ f i ≠ 0 :=
f.mem_support_to_fun
@[simp] lemma support_eq_empty {f : Π₀ i, β i} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
⟨λ H, ext $ by simpa [finset.ext_iff] using H, by simp {contextual:=tt}⟩
instance decidable_zero : decidable_pred (eq (0 : Π₀ i, β i)) :=
λ f, decidable_of_iff _ $ support_eq_empty.trans eq_comm
lemma support_subset_iff {s : set ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ (∀i∉s, f i = 0) :=
by simp [set.subset_def];
exact forall_congr (assume i, @not_imp_comm _ _ (classical.dec _) (classical.dec _))
lemma support_single_ne_zero {i : ι} {b : β i} (hb : b ≠ 0) : (single i b).support = {i} :=
begin
ext j, by_cases h : i = j,
{ subst h, simp [hb] },
simp [ne.symm h, h]
end
lemma support_single_subset {i : ι} {b : β i} : (single i b).support ⊆ {i} :=
support_mk_subset
section map_range_and_zip_with
variables {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
variables [Π i, has_zero (β₁ i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₂ i)]
lemma map_range_def [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {g : Π₀ i, β₁ i} :
map_range f hf g = mk g.support (λ i, f i.1 (g i.1)) :=
begin
ext i,
by_cases h : g i ≠ 0; simp at h; simp [h, hf]
end
@[simp] lemma map_range_single {f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {i : ι} {b : β₁ i} :
map_range f hf (single i b) = single i (f i b) :=
dfinsupp.ext $ λ i', by by_cases i = i'; [{subst i', simp}, simp [h, hf]]
variables [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [Π i (x : β₂ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
lemma support_map_range {f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {g : Π₀ i, β₁ i} :
(map_range f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
by simp [map_range_def]
lemma zip_with_def {f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0}
{g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i} :
zip_with f hf g₁ g₂ = mk (g₁.support ∪ g₂.support) (λ i, f i.1 (g₁ i.1) (g₂ i.1)) :=
begin
ext i,
by_cases h1 : g₁ i ≠ 0; by_cases h2 : g₂ i ≠ 0;
simp only [classical.not_not, ne.def] at h1 h2; simp [h1, h2, hf]
end
lemma support_zip_with {f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0}
{g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i} :
(zip_with f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
by simp [zip_with_def]
end map_range_and_zip_with
lemma erase_def (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.erase i = mk (f.support.erase i) (λ j, f j.1) :=
by { ext j, by_cases h1 : j = i; by_cases h2 : f j ≠ 0; simp at h2; simp [h1, h2] }
@[simp] lemma support_erase (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f.erase i).support = f.support.erase i :=
by { ext j, by_cases h1 : j = i; by_cases h2 : f j ≠ 0; simp at h2; simp [h1, h2] }
section filter_and_subtype_domain
variables {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
lemma filter_def (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.filter p = mk (f.support.filter p) (λ i, f i.1) :=
by ext i; by_cases h1 : p i; by_cases h2 : f i ≠ 0;
simp at h2; simp [h1, h2]
@[simp] lemma support_filter (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f.filter p).support = f.support.filter p :=
by ext i; by_cases h : p i; simp [h]
lemma subtype_domain_def (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.subtype_domain p = mk (f.support.subtype p) (λ i, f i.1) :=
by ext i; cases i with i hi;
by_cases h1 : p i; by_cases h2 : f i ≠ 0;
try {simp at h2}; dsimp; simp [h1, h2]
@[simp] lemma support_subtype_domain {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
(subtype_domain p f).support = f.support.subtype p :=
by ext i; cases i with i hi;
by_cases h1 : p i; by_cases h2 : f i ≠ 0;
try {simp at h2}; dsimp; simp [h1, h2]
end filter_and_subtype_domain
end support_basic
lemma support_add [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] {g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zip_with
@[simp] lemma support_neg [Π i, add_group (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{f : Π₀ i, β i} :
support (-f) = support f :=
by ext i; simp
local attribute [instance] dfinsupp.to_semimodule
lemma support_smul {γ : Type w} [ring γ] [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] [Π i, module γ (β i)]
[Π (i : ι) (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{b : γ} {v : Π₀ i, β i} : (b • v).support ⊆ v.support :=
support_map_range
instance [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i, decidable_eq (β i)] : decidable_eq (Π₀ i, β i) :=
assume f g, decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ (∀i∈f.support, f i = g i))
⟨assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ext $ assume i,
if h : i ∈ f.support then h₂ i h else
have hf : f i = 0, by rwa [f.mem_support_iff, not_not] at h,
have hg : g i = 0, by rwa [h₁, g.mem_support_iff, not_not] at h,
by rw [hf, hg],
by intro h; subst h; simp⟩
section prod_and_sum
variables {γ : Type w}
-- [to_additive sum] for dfinsupp.prod doesn't work, the equation lemmas are not generated
/-- `sum f g` is the sum of `g i (f i)` over the support of `f`. -/
def sum [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → γ) : γ :=
∑ i in f.support, g i (f i)
/-- `prod f g` is the product of `g i (f i)` over the support of `f`. -/
@[to_additive]
def prod [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → γ) : γ :=
∏ i in f.support, g i (f i)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_range_index {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
[Π i, has_zero (β₁ i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₂ i)]
[Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [Π i (x : β₂ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
{f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {g : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {h : Π i, β₂ i → γ}
(h0 : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) :
(map_range f hf g).prod h = g.prod (λi b, h i (f i b)) :=
begin
rw [map_range_def],
refine (finset.prod_subset support_mk_subset _).trans _,
{ intros i h1 h2,
dsimp, simp [h1] at h2, dsimp at h2,
simp [h1, h2, h0] },
{ refine finset.prod_congr rfl _,
intros i h1,
simp [h1] }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_zero_index [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {h : Π i, β i → γ} : (0 : Π₀ i, β i).prod h = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_single_index [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
{i : ι} {b : β i} {h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : h i 0 = 1) :
(single i b).prod h = h i b :=
begin
by_cases h : b ≠ 0,
{ simp [dfinsupp.prod, support_single_ne_zero h] },
{ rw [classical.not_not] at h, simp [h, prod_zero_index, h_zero], refl }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_neg_index [Π i, add_group (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
{g : Π₀ i, β i} {h : Π i, β i → γ} (h0 : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) :
(-g).prod h = g.prod (λi b, h i (- b)) :=
prod_map_range_index h0
omit dec
@[simp] lemma sum_apply {ι₁ : Type u₁} [decidable_eq ι₁] {β₁ : ι₁ → Type v₁}
[Π i₁, has_zero (β₁ i₁)] [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
{f : Π₀ i₁, β₁ i₁} {g : Π i₁, β₁ i₁ → Π₀ i, β i} {i₂ : ι} :
(f.sum g) i₂ = f.sum (λi₁ b, g i₁ b i₂) :=
(f.support.sum_hom (λf : Π₀ i, β i, f i₂)).symm
include dec
lemma support_sum {ι₁ : Type u₁} [decidable_eq ι₁] {β₁ : ι₁ → Type v₁}
[Π i₁, has_zero (β₁ i₁)] [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{f : Π₀ i₁, β₁ i₁} {g : Π i₁, β₁ i₁ → Π₀ i, β i} :
(f.sum g).support ⊆ f.support.bind (λi, (g i (f i)).support) :=
have ∀i₁ : ι, f.sum (λ (i : ι₁) (b : β₁ i), (g i b) i₁) ≠ 0 →
(∃ (i : ι₁), f i ≠ 0 ∧ ¬ (g i (f i)) i₁ = 0),
from assume i₁ h,
let ⟨i, hi, ne⟩ := finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero h in
⟨i, (f.mem_support_iff i).mp hi, ne⟩,
by simpa [finset.subset_iff, mem_support_iff, finset.mem_bind, sum_apply] using this
@[simp] lemma sum_zero [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[add_comm_monoid γ] {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
f.sum (λi b, (0 : γ)) = 0 :=
finset.sum_const_zero
@[simp] lemma sum_add [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[add_comm_monoid γ] {f : Π₀ i, β i} {h₁ h₂ : Π i, β i → γ} :
f.sum (λi b, h₁ i b + h₂ i b) = f.sum h₁ + f.sum h₂ :=
finset.sum_add_distrib
@[simp] lemma sum_neg [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[add_comm_group γ] {f : Π₀ i, β i} {h : Π i, β i → γ} :
f.sum (λi b, - h i b) = - f.sum h :=
f.support.sum_hom (@has_neg.neg γ _)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_add_index [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {f g : Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ + b₂) = h i b₁ * h i b₂) :
(f + g).prod h = f.prod h * g.prod h :=
have f_eq : ∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (f i) = f.prod h,
from (finset.prod_subset (finset.subset_union_left _ _) $
by simp [mem_support_iff, h_zero] {contextual := tt}).symm,
have g_eq : ∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (g i) = g.prod h,
from (finset.prod_subset (finset.subset_union_right _ _) $
by simp [mem_support_iff, h_zero] {contextual := tt}).symm,
calc ∏ i in (f + g).support, h i ((f + g) i) =
∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i ((f + g) i) :
finset.prod_subset support_add $
by simp [mem_support_iff, h_zero] {contextual := tt}
... = (∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (f i)) *
(∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (g i)) :
by simp [h_add, finset.prod_mul_distrib]
... = _ : by rw [f_eq, g_eq]
lemma sum_sub_index [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[add_comm_group γ] {f g : Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_sub : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ - b₂) = h i b₁ - h i b₂) :
(f - g).sum h = f.sum h - g.sum h :=
have h_zero : ∀i, h i 0 = 0,
from assume i,
have h i (0 - 0) = h i 0 - h i 0, from h_sub i 0 0,
by simpa using this,
have h_neg : ∀i b, h i (- b) = - h i b,
from assume i b,
have h i (0 - b) = h i 0 - h i b, from h_sub i 0 b,
by simpa [h_zero] using this,
have h_add : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ + b₂) = h i b₁ + h i b₂,
from assume i b₁ b₂,
have h i (b₁ - (- b₂)) = h i b₁ - h i (- b₂), from h_sub i b₁ (-b₂),
by simpa [h_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using this,
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg];
simp [@sum_add_index ι β _ γ _ _ _ f (-g) h h_zero h_add];
simp [@sum_neg_index ι β _ γ _ _ _ g h h_zero, h_neg];
simp [@sum_neg ι β _ γ _ _ _ g h]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_finset_sum_index {γ : Type w} {α : Type x}
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ]
{s : finset α} {g : α → Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ + b₂) = h i b₁ * h i b₂) :
∏ i in s, (g i).prod h = (∑ i in s, g i).prod h :=
begin
classical,
exact finset.induction_on s
(by simp [prod_zero_index])
(by simp [prod_add_index, h_zero, h_add] {contextual := tt})
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sum_index {ι₁ : Type u₁} [decidable_eq ι₁] {β₁ : ι₁ → Type v₁}
[Π i₁, has_zero (β₁ i₁)] [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ]
{f : Π₀ i₁, β₁ i₁} {g : Π i₁, β₁ i₁ → Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ + b₂) = h i b₁ * h i b₂) :
(f.sum g).prod h = f.prod (λi b, (g i b).prod h) :=
(prod_finset_sum_index h_zero h_add).symm
@[simp] lemma sum_single [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
[Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
f.sum single = f :=
begin
apply dfinsupp.induction f, {rw [sum_zero_index]},
intros i b f H hb ih,
rw [sum_add_index, ih, sum_single_index],
all_goals { intros, simp }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_subtype_domain_index [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {v : Π₀ i, β i} {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (hp : ∀ x ∈ v.support, p x) :
(v.subtype_domain p).prod (λi b, h i.1 b) = v.prod h :=
finset.prod_bij (λp _, p.val)
(by { dsimp, simp })
(by simp)
(assume ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩ ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩, by simp)
(λ i hi, ⟨⟨i, hp i hi⟩, by simpa using hi, rfl⟩)
omit dec
lemma subtype_domain_sum [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
{s : finset γ} {h : γ → Π₀ i, β i} {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
(∑ c in s, h c).subtype_domain p = ∑ c in s, (h c).subtype_domain p :=
eq.symm (s.sum_hom _)
lemma subtype_domain_finsupp_sum {δ : γ → Type x} [decidable_eq γ]
[Π c, has_zero (δ c)] [Π c (x : δ c), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{s : Π₀ c, δ c} {h : Π c, δ c → Π₀ i, β i} :
(s.sum h).subtype_domain p = s.sum (λc d, (h c d).subtype_domain p) :=
subtype_domain_sum
end prod_and_sum
end dfinsupp
|
93a8864a3f1dc64b0ad95a95e4f959697a6b66b7 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/analysis/normed_space/riesz_lemma.lean | 1c979d69f13a8759d0a86b4010358a06d0179bf5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,377 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo
-/
import analysis.normed_space.basic
import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance
/-!
# Riesz's lemma
Riesz's lemma, stated for a normed space over a normed field: for any
closed proper subspace F of E, there is a nonzero x such that ∥x - F∥
is at least r * ∥x∥ for any r < 1.
-/
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
/-- Riesz's lemma, which usually states that it is possible to find a
vector with norm 1 whose distance to a closed proper subspace is
arbitrarily close to 1. The statement here is in terms of multiples of
norms, since in general the existence of an element of norm exactly 1
is not guaranteed. -/
lemma riesz_lemma {F : subspace 𝕜 E} (hFc : is_closed (F : set E))
(hF : ∃ x : E, x ∉ F) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1) :
∃ x₀ : E, x₀ ∉ F ∧ ∀ y ∈ F, r * ∥x₀∥ ≤ ∥x₀ - y∥ :=
begin
classical,
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x : E, x ∉ F := hF,
let d := metric.inf_dist x F,
have hFn : (F : set E) ≠ ∅, from set.ne_empty_of_mem (submodule.zero F),
have hdp : 0 < d,
from lt_of_le_of_ne metric.inf_dist_nonneg (λ heq, hx
((metric.mem_iff_inf_dist_zero_of_closed hFc hFn).2 heq.symm)),
let r' := max r 2⁻¹,
have hr' : r' < 1, by { simp [r', hr], norm_num },
have hlt : 0 < r' := lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) (le_max_right r 2⁻¹),
have hdlt : d < d / r', from lt_div_of_mul_lt hlt ((mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right hdp).2 hr'),
obtain ⟨y₀, hy₀F, hxy₀⟩ : ∃ y ∈ F, dist x y < d / r' :=
metric.exists_dist_lt_of_inf_dist_lt hdlt hFn,
have x_ne_y₀ : x - y₀ ∉ F,
{ by_contradiction h,
have : (x - y₀) + y₀ ∈ F, from F.add h hy₀F,
simp only [neg_add_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg] at this,
exact hx this },
refine ⟨x - y₀, x_ne_y₀, λy hy, le_of_lt _⟩,
have hy₀y : y₀ + y ∈ F, from F.add hy₀F hy,
calc
r * ∥x - y₀∥ ≤ r' * ∥x - y₀∥ : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
... < d : by { rw ←dist_eq_norm, exact (lt_div_iff' hlt).1 hxy₀ }
... ≤ dist x (y₀ + y) : metric.inf_dist_le_dist_of_mem hy₀y
... = ∥x - y₀ - y∥ : by { rw [sub_sub, dist_eq_norm] }
end
|
d9fe236f207c60ed612b7ae732cadbdb8ea2f3e3 | 510e96af568b060ed5858226ad954c258549f143 | /algebra/group_power.lean | c2d7ee23a0d32679a0f35e6da3137fd784be45c4 | [] | no_license | Shamrock-Frost/library_dev | cb6d1739237d81e17720118f72ba0a6db8a5906b | 0245c71e4931d3aceeacf0aea776454f6ee03c9c | refs/heads/master | 1,609,481,034,595 | 1,500,165,215,000 | 1,500,165,347,000 | 97,350,162 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,500,164,969,000 | 1,500,164,969,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,717 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis
The power operation on monoids and groups. We separate this from group, because it depends on
nat, which in turn depends on other parts of algebra.
We have "pow a n" for natural number powers, and "gpow a i" for integer powers. The notation
a^n is used for the first, but users can locally redefine it to gpow when needed.
Note: power adopts the convention that 0^0=1.
-/
import data.nat.basic data.int.basic ..tools.auto.finish
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
class has_pow_nat (α : Type u) :=
(pow_nat : α → nat → α)
definition pow_nat {α : Type u} [s : has_pow_nat α] : α → nat → α :=
has_pow_nat.pow_nat
infix ` ^ ` := pow_nat
class has_pow_int (α : Type u) :=
(pow_int : α → int → α)
definition pow_int {α : Type u} [s : has_pow_int α] : α → int → α :=
has_pow_int.pow_int
/- monoid -/
section monoid
open nat
variable [s : monoid α]
include s
definition monoid.pow (a : α) : ℕ → α
| 0 := 1
| (n+1) := a * monoid.pow n
instance monoid.has_pow_nat : has_pow_nat α :=
has_pow_nat.mk monoid.pow
@[simp] theorem pow_zero (a : α) : a^0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem pow_succ (a : α) (n : ℕ) : a^(succ n) = a * a^n := rfl
@[simp] theorem pow_one (a : α) : a^1 = a := mul_one _
theorem pow_succ' (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), a^(succ n) = (a^n) * a
| 0 := by simp
| (succ n) :=
suffices a * (a ^ n * a) = a * a ^ succ n, by simp [this],
by rw <-pow_succ'
@[simp] theorem one_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, (1 : α)^n = (1:α)
| 0 := rfl
| (succ n) := by simp; rw one_pow
theorem pow_add (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℕ, a^(m + n) = a^m * a^n
| m 0 := by simp
| m (n+1) := by rw [add_succ, pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_add, mul_assoc]
theorem pow_mul (a : α) (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, a^(m * n) = (a^m)^n
| 0 := by simp
| (succ n) := by rw [nat.mul_succ, pow_add, pow_succ', pow_mul]
theorem pow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℕ) : a^m * a^n = a^n * a^m :=
by rw [←pow_add, ←pow_add, add_comm]
end monoid
/- commutative monoid -/
section comm_monoid
open nat
variable [s : comm_monoid α]
include s
theorem mul_pow (a b : α) : ∀ n, (a * b)^n = a^n * b^n
| 0 := by simp
| (succ n) := by simp; rw mul_pow
end comm_monoid
section group
variable [s : group α]
include s
section nat
open nat
theorem inv_pow (a : α) : ∀n, (a⁻¹)^n = (a^n)⁻¹
| 0 := by simp
| (succ n) := by rw [pow_succ', _root_.pow_succ, mul_inv_rev, inv_pow]
theorem pow_sub (a : α) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≥ n) : a^(m - n) = a^m * (a^n)⁻¹ :=
have h1 : m - n + n = m, from nat.sub_add_cancel h,
have h2 : a^(m - n) * a^n = a^m, by rw [←pow_add, h1],
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h2
theorem pow_inv_comm (a : α) : ∀m n, (a⁻¹)^m * a^n = a^n * (a⁻¹)^m
| 0 n := by simp
| m 0 := by simp
| (succ m) (succ n) := calc
a⁻¹ ^ succ m * a ^ succ n = (a⁻¹ ^ m * a⁻¹) * (a * a^n) : by rw [pow_succ', _root_.pow_succ]
... = a⁻¹ ^ m * (a⁻¹ * a) * a^n : by simp
... = a⁻¹ ^ m * a^n : by simp
... = a ^ n * (a⁻¹)^m : by rw pow_inv_comm
... = a ^ n * (a * a⁻¹) * (a⁻¹)^m : by simp
... = (a^n * a) * (a⁻¹ * (a⁻¹)^m) : by simp only [mul_assoc]
... = a ^ succ n * a⁻¹ ^ succ m : by rw [pow_succ', _root_.pow_succ]; simp
end nat
open int
definition gpow (a : α) : ℤ → α
| (of_nat n) := a^n
| -[1+n] := (a^(nat.succ n))⁻¹
local attribute [ematch] le_of_lt
open nat
private lemma gpow_add_aux (a : α) (m n : nat) :
gpow a ((of_nat m) + -[1+n]) = gpow a (of_nat m) * gpow a (-[1+n]) :=
or.elim (nat.lt_or_ge m (nat.succ n))
(suppose m < succ n,
have m ≤ n, from le_of_lt_succ this,
suffices gpow a -[1+ n-m] = (gpow a (of_nat m)) * (gpow a -[1+n]), by simp [*, of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_lt],
suffices (a^(nat.succ (n - m)))⁻¹ = (gpow a (of_nat m)) * (gpow a -[1+n]), from this,
suffices (a^(nat.succ n - m))⁻¹ = (gpow a (of_nat m)) * (gpow a -[1+n]), by rw ←succ_sub; assumption,
by rw pow_sub; finish [gpow])
(suppose m ≥ succ n,
suffices gpow a (of_nat (m - succ n)) = (gpow a (of_nat m)) * (gpow a -[1+ n]),
by rw [of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_ge]; assumption,
suffices a ^ (m - succ n) = a^m * (a^succ n)⁻¹, from this,
by rw pow_sub; assumption)
theorem gpow_add (a : α) : ∀i j : int, gpow a (i + j) = gpow a i * gpow a j
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := pow_add _ _ _
| (of_nat m) -[1+n] := gpow_add_aux _ _ _
| -[1+m] (of_nat n) := begin rw [add_comm, gpow_add_aux], unfold gpow, rw [←inv_pow, pow_inv_comm] end
| -[1+m] -[1+n] :=
suffices (a ^ (m + succ (succ n)))⁻¹ = (a ^ succ m)⁻¹ * (a ^ succ n)⁻¹, from this,
by rw [←succ_add_eq_succ_add, add_comm, pow_add, mul_inv_rev]
theorem gpow_comm (a : α) (i j : ℤ) : gpow a i * gpow a j = gpow a j * gpow a i :=
by rw [←gpow_add, ←gpow_add, add_comm]
end group
section ordered_ring
open nat
variable [s : linear_ordered_ring α]
include s
theorem pow_pos {a : α} (H : a > 0) : ∀ (n : ℕ), a ^ n > 0
| 0 := by simp; apply zero_lt_one
| (succ n) := begin simp, apply mul_pos, assumption, apply pow_pos end
theorem pow_ge_one_of_ge_one {a : α} (H : a ≥ 1) : ∀ (n : ℕ), a ^ n ≥ 1
| 0 := by simp; apply le_refl
| (succ n) :=
begin
simp, rw ←(one_mul (1 : α)),
apply mul_le_mul,
assumption,
apply pow_ge_one_of_ge_one,
apply zero_le_one,
transitivity, apply zero_le_one, assumption
end
end ordered_ring
|
c6a60fd2dca3750b37561bd77b43412d64aeebf3 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/monad/types.lean | f2de381d04e1067ca5df7b71fe6bec914b34078c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,901 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.monad.basic
import category_theory.monad.kleisli
import category_theory.category.Kleisli
import category_theory.types
/-!
# Convert from `monad` (i.e. Lean's `Type`-based monads) to `category_theory.monad`
This allows us to use these monads in category theory.
-/
namespace category_theory
section
universes u
variables (m : Type u → Type u) [_root_.monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
instance : monad (of_type_functor m) :=
{ η := ⟨@pure m _, assume α β f, (is_lawful_applicative.map_comp_pure f).symm ⟩,
μ := ⟨@mjoin m _, assume α β (f : α → β), funext $ assume a, mjoin_map_map f a ⟩,
assoc' := assume α, funext $ assume a, mjoin_map_mjoin a,
left_unit' := assume α, funext $ assume a, mjoin_pure a,
right_unit' := assume α, funext $ assume a, mjoin_map_pure a }
/--
The `Kleisli` category of a `control.monad` is equivalent to the `kleisli` category of its
category-theoretic version, provided the monad is lawful.
-/
@[simps]
def eq : Kleisli m ≌ kleisli (of_type_functor m) :=
{ functor :=
{ obj := λ X, X,
map := λ X Y f, f,
map_id' := λ X, rfl,
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g,
begin
unfold_projs,
ext,
simp [mjoin, seq_bind_eq],
end },
inverse :=
{ obj := λ X, X,
map := λ X Y f, f,
map_id' := λ X, rfl,
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g,
begin
unfold_projs,
ext,
simp [mjoin, seq_bind_eq],
end },
unit_iso :=
begin
refine nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl X) (λ X Y f, _),
change f >=> pure = pure >=> f,
simp with functor_norm,
end,
counit_iso := nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl X) (λ X Y f, by tidy) }
end
end category_theory
|
61216007c5847bcf70d41b3b933b1a6cbb7060ec | ec040be767d27b10d2f864ddcfdf756aeb7a9a0a | /src/assignments/assignment_5/assignment_5.lean | 2701bf8f9449b6cc25601808147e08b2b33b7a2b | [] | no_license | RoboticPanda77/complogic-s21 | b26a9680dfb98ac650e40539296c0cafc86f5cb4 | 93c5bcc0139c0926cc261075f50a8b1ead6aa40c | refs/heads/master | 1,682,196,614,558 | 1,620,625,035,000 | 1,620,625,035,000 | 337,230,148 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,620,625,036,000 | 1,612,824,240,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 114 | lean | /-
Formalizing algebraic structures. Typeclasses
and group theory. See Collab site for details.
-/
import algebra |
a105205f2a7805eaf94ef87ca407ad2a7591be21 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/data/rat/order.lean | 7572764f738757b7e756095ff873765c3c576d42 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,602 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.rat.basic
/-!
# Order for Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define the order on `ℚ`, prove that `ℚ` is a discrete, linearly ordered field, and define
functions such as `abs` and `sqrt` that depend on this order.
## Notations
- `/.` is infix notation for `rat.mk`.
## Tags
rat, rationals, field, ℚ, numerator, denominator, num, denom, order, ordering, sqrt, abs
-/
namespace rat
variables (a b c : ℚ)
open_locale rat
/-- A rational number is called nonnegative if its numerator is nonnegative. -/
protected def nonneg (r : ℚ) : Prop := 0 ≤ r.num
@[simp] theorem mk_nonneg (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (h : 0 < b) : (a /. b).nonneg ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
begin
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
simp [rat.nonneg],
have d0 := int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁,
have := (mk_eq (ne_of_gt h) (ne_of_gt d0)).1 ha,
constructor; intro h₂,
{ apply nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right _ d0,
rw this, exact mul_nonneg h₂ (le_of_lt h) },
{ apply nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right _ h,
rw ← this, exact mul_nonneg h₂ (int.coe_zero_le _) },
end
protected lemma nonneg_add {a b} : rat.nonneg a → rat.nonneg b → rat.nonneg (a + b) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
begin
have d₁0 : 0 < (d₁:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₁),
have d₂0 : 0 < (d₂:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₂),
simp [d₁0, d₂0, h₁, h₂, mul_pos d₁0 d₂0],
intros n₁0 n₂0,
apply add_nonneg; apply mul_nonneg; {assumption <|> apply int.coe_zero_le},
end
protected lemma nonneg_mul {a b} : rat.nonneg a → rat.nonneg b → rat.nonneg (a * b) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
begin
have d₁0 : 0 < (d₁:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₁),
have d₂0 : 0 < (d₂:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h₂),
simp [d₁0, d₂0, h₁, h₂, mul_pos d₁0 d₂0, mul_nonneg] { contextual := tt }
end
protected lemma nonneg_antisymm {a} : rat.nonneg a → rat.nonneg (-a) → a = 0 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
begin
have d0 : 0 < (d:ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h),
simp [d0, h],
exact λ h₁ h₂, le_antisymm h₂ h₁
end
protected lemma nonneg_total : rat.nonneg a ∨ rat.nonneg (-a) :=
by cases a with n; exact
or.imp_right neg_nonneg_of_nonpos (le_total 0 n)
instance decidable_nonneg : decidable (rat.nonneg a) :=
by cases a; unfold rat.nonneg; apply_instance
/-- Relation `a ≤ b` on `ℚ` defined as `a ≤ b ↔ rat.nonneg (b - a)`. Use `a ≤ b` instead of
`rat.le a b`. -/
protected def le (a b : ℚ) := rat.nonneg (b - a)
instance : has_le ℚ := ⟨rat.le⟩
instance decidable_le : decidable_rel ((≤) : ℚ → ℚ → Prop)
| a b := show decidable (rat.nonneg (b - a)), by apply_instance
protected theorem le_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) :
a /. b ≤ c /. d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
begin
show rat.nonneg _ ↔ _,
rw ← sub_nonneg,
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, ne_of_gt b0, ne_of_gt d0, mul_pos d0 b0]
end
protected theorem le_refl : a ≤ a :=
show rat.nonneg (a - a), by rw sub_self; exact le_refl (0 : ℤ)
protected theorem le_total : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a :=
by have := rat.nonneg_total (b - a); rwa neg_sub at this
protected theorem le_antisymm {a b : ℚ} (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : b ≤ a) : a = b :=
by { have := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero (rat.nonneg_antisymm hba $ by rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, neg_sub]),
rwa neg_neg at this }
protected theorem le_trans {a b c : ℚ} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c :=
have rat.nonneg (b - a + (c - b)), from rat.nonneg_add hab hbc,
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
instance : linear_order ℚ :=
{ le := rat.le,
le_refl := rat.le_refl,
le_trans := @rat.le_trans,
le_antisymm := @rat.le_antisymm,
le_total := rat.le_total,
decidable_eq := by apply_instance,
decidable_le := assume a b, rat.decidable_nonneg (b - a) }
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : has_lt ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : distrib_lattice ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : lattice ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semilattice_inf ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semilattice_sup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : has_inf ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : has_sup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : partial_order ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : preorder ℚ := by apply_instance
protected lemma le_def' {p q : ℚ} : p ≤ q ↔ p.num * q.denom ≤ q.num * p.denom :=
begin
rw [←(@num_denom q), ←(@num_denom p)],
conv_rhs { simp only [num_denom] },
exact rat.le_def (by exact_mod_cast p.pos) (by exact_mod_cast q.pos)
end
protected lemma lt_def {p q : ℚ} : p < q ↔ p.num * q.denom < q.num * p.denom :=
begin
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, rat.le_def'],
suffices : p ≠ q ↔ p.num * q.denom ≠ q.num * p.denom, by {
split; intro h,
{ exact lt_iff_le_and_ne.elim_right ⟨h.left, (this.elim_left h.right)⟩ },
{ have tmp := lt_iff_le_and_ne.elim_left h, exact ⟨tmp.left, this.elim_right tmp.right⟩ }},
exact (not_iff_not.elim_right eq_iff_mul_eq_mul)
end
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a} : rat.nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
show rat.nonneg a ↔ rat.nonneg (a - 0), by simp
theorem num_nonneg_iff_zero_le : ∀ {a : ℚ}, 0 ≤ a.num ↔ 0 ≤ a
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ := @nonneg_iff_zero_le ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
protected theorem add_le_add_left {a b c : ℚ} : c + a ≤ c + b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by unfold has_le.le rat.le; rw add_sub_add_left_eq_sub
protected theorem mul_nonneg {a b : ℚ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a * b :=
by rw ← nonneg_iff_zero_le at ha hb ⊢; exact rat.nonneg_mul ha hb
instance : linear_ordered_field ℚ :=
{ zero_le_one := dec_trivial,
add_le_add_left := assume a b ab c, rat.add_le_add_left.2 ab,
mul_pos := assume a b ha hb, lt_of_le_of_ne
(rat.mul_nonneg (le_of_lt ha) (le_of_lt hb))
(mul_ne_zero (ne_of_lt ha).symm (ne_of_lt hb).symm).symm,
..rat.field,
..rat.linear_order,
..rat.semiring }
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : linear_ordered_comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_add_comm_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_add_comm_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : ordered_add_comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
attribute [irreducible] rat.le
theorem num_pos_iff_pos {a : ℚ} : 0 < a.num ↔ 0 < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $
by simpa [(by cases a; refl : (-a).num = -a.num)]
using @num_nonneg_iff_zero_le (-a)
lemma div_lt_div_iff_mul_lt_mul {a b c d : ℤ} (b_pos : 0 < b) (d_pos : 0 < d) :
(a : ℚ) / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
begin
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le],
apply and_congr,
{ simp [div_num_denom, (rat.le_def b_pos d_pos)] },
{ apply not_iff_not_of_iff, simp [div_num_denom, (rat.le_def d_pos b_pos)] }
end
lemma lt_one_iff_num_lt_denom {q : ℚ} : q < 1 ↔ q.num < q.denom :=
begin
cases decidable.em (0 < q) with q_pos q_nonpos,
{ simp [rat.lt_def] },
{ replace q_nonpos : q ≤ 0, from not_lt.elim_left q_nonpos,
have : q.num < q.denom, by
{ have : ¬0 < q.num ↔ ¬0 < q, from not_iff_not.elim_right num_pos_iff_pos,
simp only [not_lt] at this,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (this.elim_right q_nonpos) (by exact_mod_cast q.pos) },
simp only [this, (lt_of_le_of_lt q_nonpos zero_lt_one)] }
end
theorem abs_def (q : ℚ) : |q| = q.num.nat_abs /. q.denom :=
begin
cases le_total q 0 with hq hq,
{ rw [abs_of_nonpos hq],
rw [←(@num_denom q), ← mk_zero_one, rat.le_def (int.coe_nat_pos.2 q.pos) zero_lt_one,
mul_one, zero_mul] at hq,
rw [int.of_nat_nat_abs_of_nonpos hq, ← neg_def, num_denom] },
{ rw [abs_of_nonneg hq],
rw [←(@num_denom q), ← mk_zero_one, rat.le_def zero_lt_one (int.coe_nat_pos.2 q.pos),
mul_one, zero_mul] at hq,
rw [int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hq, num_denom] }
end
end rat
|
04197b3751b76eb774f63d60a6bf1d2acf1ec5d0 | e0f9ba56b7fedc16ef8697f6caeef5898b435143 | /src/order/filter/extr.lean | 6a207a9afa8262a25b7fa31d26dcd403ce1fe20b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anrddh/mathlib | 6a374da53c7e3a35cb0298b0cd67824efef362b4 | a4266a01d2dcb10de19369307c986d038c7bb6a6 | refs/heads/master | 1,656,710,827,909 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 264,271,800 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,589,568,062,000 | 1,589,568,061,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,647 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import order.filter.basic
/-! # Minimum and maximum w.r.t. a filter and on a aet
## Main Definitions
This file defines six predicates of the form `is_A_B`, where `A` is `min`, `max`, or `extr`,
and `B` is `filter` or `on`.
* `is_min_filter f l a` means that `f a ≤ f x` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a`;
* `is_max_filter f l a` means that `f x ≤ f a` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a`;
* `is_extr_filter f l a` means `is_min_filter f l a` or `is_max_filter f l a`.
Similar predicates with `_on` suffix are particular cases for `l = principal s`.
## Main statements
### Change of the filter (set) argument
* `is_*_filter.filter_mono` : replace the filter with a smaller one;
* `is_*_filter.filter_inf` : replace a filter `l` with `l ⊓ l'`;
* `is_*_on.on_subset` : restrict to a smaller set;
* `is_*_on.inter` : replace a set `s` wtih `s ∩ t`.
### Composition
* `is_*_*.comp_mono` : if `x` is an extremum for `f` and `g` is a monotone function,
then `x` is an extremum for `g ∘ f`;
* `is_*_*.comp_antimono` : similarly for the case of monotonically decreasing `g`;
* `is_*_*.bicomp_mono` : if `x` is an extremum of the same type for `f` and `g`
and a binary operation `op` is monotone in both arguments, then `x` is an extremum
of the same type for `λ x, op (f x) (g x)`.
* `is_*_filter.comp_tendsto` : if `g x` is an extremum for `f` w.r.t. `l'` and `tendsto g l l'`,
then `x` is an extremum for `f ∘ g` w.r.t. `l`.
* `is_*_on.on_preimage` : if `g x` is an extremum for `f` on `s`, then `x` is an extremum
for `f ∘ g` on `g ⁻¹' s`.
### Algebraic operations
* `is_*_*.add` : if `x` is an extremum of the same type for two functions,
then it is an extremum of the same type for their sum;
* `is_*_*.neg` : if `x` is an extremum for `f`, then it is an extremum
of the opposite type for `-f`;
* `is_*_*.sub` : if `x` is an a minimum for `f` and a maximum for `g`,
then it is a minimum for `f - g` and a maximum for `g - f`;
* `is_*_*.max`, `is_*_*.min`, `is_*_*.sup`, `is_*_*.inf` : similarly for `is_*_*.add`
for pointwise `max`, `min`, `sup`, `inf`, respectively.
### Miscellaneous definitions
* `is_*_*_const` : any point is both a minimum and maximum for a constant function;
* `is_min/max_*.is_ext` : any minimum/maximum point is an extremum;
* `is_*_*.dual`, `is_*_*.undual`: conversion between codomains `α` and `dual α`;
## Missing features (TODO)
* Multiplication and division;
* `is_*_*.bicompl` : if `x` is a minimum for `f`, `y` is a minimum for `g`, and `op` is a monotone
binary operation, then `(x, y)` is a minimum for `uncurry (bicompl op f g)`. From this point of view,
`is_*_*.bicomp` is a composition
* It would be nice to have a tactic that specializes `comp_(anti)mono` or `bicomp_mono`
based on a proof of monotonicity of a given (binary) function. The tactic should maintain a `meta`
list of known (anti)monotone (binary) functions with their names, as well as a list of special
types of filters, and define the missing lemmas once one of these two lists grows.
-/
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
open set filter
section preorder
variables [preorder β] [preorder γ]
variables (f : α → β) (s : set α) (l : filter α) (a : α)
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- `is_min_filter f l a` means that `f a ≤ f x` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a` -/
def is_min_filter : Prop := ∀ᶠ x in l, f a ≤ f x
/-- `is_max_filter f l a` means that `f x ≤ f a` in some `l`-neighborhood of `a` -/
def is_max_filter : Prop := ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ f a
/-- `is_extr_filter f l a` means `is_min_filter f l a` or `is_max_filter f l a` -/
def is_extr_filter : Prop := is_min_filter f l a ∨ is_max_filter f l a
/-- `is_min_on f s a` means that `f a ≤ f x` for all `x ∈ a`. Note that we do not assume `a ∈ s`. -/
def is_min_on := is_min_filter f (principal s) a
/-- `is_max_on f s a` means that `f x ≤ f a` for all `x ∈ a`. Note that we do not assume `a ∈ s`. -/
def is_max_on := is_max_filter f (principal s) a
/-- `is_extr_on f s a` means `is_min_on f s a` or `is_max_on f s a` -/
def is_extr_on : Prop := is_extr_filter f (principal s) a
variables {f s a l} {t : set α} {l' : filter α}
lemma is_extr_on.elim {p : Prop} :
is_extr_on f s a → (is_min_on f s a → p) → (is_max_on f s a → p) → p :=
or.elim
lemma is_min_on_iff : is_min_on f s a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f a ≤ f x := iff.rfl
lemma is_max_on_iff : is_max_on f s a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ f a := iff.rfl
lemma is_min_on_univ_iff : is_min_on f univ a ↔ ∀ x, f a ≤ f x :=
univ_subset_iff.trans eq_univ_iff_forall
lemma is_max_on_univ_iff : is_max_on f univ a ↔ ∀ x, f x ≤ f a :=
univ_subset_iff.trans eq_univ_iff_forall
/-! ### Conversion to `is_extr_*` -/
lemma is_min_filter.is_extr : is_min_filter f l a → is_extr_filter f l a := or.inl
lemma is_max_filter.is_extr : is_max_filter f l a → is_extr_filter f l a := or.inr
lemma is_min_on.is_extr (h : is_min_on f s a) : is_extr_on f s a := h.is_extr
lemma is_max_on.is_extr (h : is_max_on f s a) : is_extr_on f s a := h.is_extr
/-! ### Constant function -/
lemma is_min_filter_const {b : β} : is_min_filter (λ _, b) l a :=
univ_mem_sets' $ λ _, le_refl _
lemma is_max_filter_const {b : β} : is_max_filter (λ _, b) l a :=
univ_mem_sets' $ λ _, le_refl _
lemma is_extr_filter_const {b : β} : is_extr_filter (λ _, b) l a := is_min_filter_const.is_extr
lemma is_min_on_const {b : β} : is_min_on (λ _, b) s a := is_min_filter_const
lemma is_max_on_const {b : β} : is_max_on (λ _, b) s a := is_max_filter_const
lemma is_extr_on_const {b : β} : is_extr_on (λ _, b) s a := is_extr_filter_const
/-! ### Order dual -/
lemma is_min_filter_dual_iff : @is_min_filter α (order_dual β) _ f l a ↔ is_max_filter f l a :=
iff.rfl
lemma is_max_filter_dual_iff : @is_max_filter α (order_dual β) _ f l a ↔ is_min_filter f l a :=
iff.rfl
lemma is_extr_filter_dual_iff : @is_extr_filter α (order_dual β) _ f l a ↔ is_extr_filter f l a :=
or_comm _ _
alias is_min_filter_dual_iff ↔ is_min_filter.undual is_max_filter.dual
alias is_max_filter_dual_iff ↔ is_max_filter.undual is_min_filter.dual
alias is_extr_filter_dual_iff ↔ is_extr_filter.undual is_extr_filter.dual
lemma is_min_on_dual_iff : @is_min_on α (order_dual β) _ f s a ↔ is_max_on f s a := iff.rfl
lemma is_max_on_dual_iff : @is_max_on α (order_dual β) _ f s a ↔ is_min_on f s a := iff.rfl
lemma is_extr_on_dual_iff : @is_extr_on α (order_dual β) _ f s a ↔ is_extr_on f s a := or_comm _ _
alias is_min_on_dual_iff ↔ is_min_on.undual is_max_on.dual
alias is_max_on_dual_iff ↔ is_max_on.undual is_min_on.dual
alias is_extr_on_dual_iff ↔ is_extr_on.undual is_extr_on.dual
/-! ### Operations on the filter/set -/
lemma is_min_filter.filter_mono (h : is_min_filter f l a) (hl : l' ≤ l) :
is_min_filter f l' a := hl h
lemma is_max_filter.filter_mono (h : is_max_filter f l a) (hl : l' ≤ l) :
is_max_filter f l' a := hl h
lemma is_extr_filter.filter_mono (h : is_extr_filter f l a) (hl : l' ≤ l) :
is_extr_filter f l' a :=
h.elim (λ h, (h.filter_mono hl).is_extr) (λ h, (h.filter_mono hl).is_extr)
lemma is_min_filter.filter_inf (h : is_min_filter f l a) (l') : is_min_filter f (l ⊓ l') a :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma is_max_filter.filter_inf (h : is_max_filter f l a) (l') : is_max_filter f (l ⊓ l') a :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma is_extr_filter.filter_inf (h : is_extr_filter f l a) (l') : is_extr_filter f (l ⊓ l') a :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma is_min_on.on_subset (hf : is_min_on f t a) (h : s ⊆ t) : is_min_on f s a :=
hf.filter_mono $ principal_mono.2 h
lemma is_max_on.on_subset (hf : is_max_on f t a) (h : s ⊆ t) : is_max_on f s a :=
hf.filter_mono $ principal_mono.2 h
lemma is_extr_on.on_subset (hf : is_extr_on f t a) (h : s ⊆ t) : is_extr_on f s a :=
hf.filter_mono $ principal_mono.2 h
lemma is_min_on.inter (hf : is_min_on f s a) (t) : is_min_on f (s ∩ t) a :=
hf.on_subset (inter_subset_left s t)
lemma is_max_on.inter (hf : is_max_on f s a) (t) : is_max_on f (s ∩ t) a :=
hf.on_subset (inter_subset_left s t)
lemma is_extr_on.inter (hf : is_extr_on f s a) (t) : is_extr_on f (s ∩ t) a :=
hf.on_subset (inter_subset_left s t)
/-! ### Composition with (anti)monotone functions -/
lemma is_min_filter.comp_mono (hf : is_min_filter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : monotone g) :
is_min_filter (g ∘ f) l a :=
mem_sets_of_superset hf $ λ x hx, hg hx
lemma is_max_filter.comp_mono (hf : is_max_filter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : monotone g) :
is_max_filter (g ∘ f) l a :=
mem_sets_of_superset hf $ λ x hx, hg hx
lemma is_extr_filter.comp_mono (hf : is_extr_filter f l a) {g : β → γ} (hg : monotone g) :
is_extr_filter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.elim (λ hf, (hf.comp_mono hg).is_extr) (λ hf, (hf.comp_mono hg).is_extr)
lemma is_min_filter.comp_antimono (hf : is_min_filter f l a) {g : β → γ}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → g y ≤ g x) :
is_max_filter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.dual.comp_mono (λ x y h, hg h)
lemma is_max_filter.comp_antimono (hf : is_max_filter f l a) {g : β → γ}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → g y ≤ g x) :
is_min_filter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.dual.comp_mono (λ x y h, hg h)
lemma is_extr_filter.comp_antimono (hf : is_extr_filter f l a) {g : β → γ}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → g y ≤ g x) :
is_extr_filter (g ∘ f) l a :=
hf.dual.comp_mono (λ x y h, hg h)
lemma is_min_on.comp_mono (hf : is_min_on f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : monotone g) :
is_min_on (g ∘ f) s a :=
hf.comp_mono hg
lemma is_max_on.comp_mono (hf : is_max_on f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : monotone g) :
is_max_on (g ∘ f) s a :=
hf.comp_mono hg
lemma is_extr_on.comp_mono (hf : is_extr_on f s a) {g : β → γ} (hg : monotone g) :
is_extr_on (g ∘ f) s a :=
hf.comp_mono hg
lemma is_min_on.comp_antimono (hf : is_min_on f s a) {g : β → γ}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → g y ≤ g x) :
is_max_on (g ∘ f) s a :=
hf.comp_antimono hg
lemma is_max_on.comp_antimono (hf : is_max_on f s a) {g : β → γ}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → g y ≤ g x) :
is_min_on (g ∘ f) s a :=
hf.comp_antimono hg
lemma is_extr_on.comp_antimono (hf : is_extr_on f s a) {g : β → γ}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → g y ≤ g x) :
is_extr_on (g ∘ f) s a :=
hf.comp_antimono hg
lemma is_min_filter.bicomp_mono [preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ} (hop : ((≤) ⇒ (≤) ⇒ (≤)) op op)
(hf : is_min_filter f l a) {g : α → γ} (hg : is_min_filter g l a) :
is_min_filter (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) l a :=
mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_sets hf hg) $ λ x ⟨hfx, hgx⟩, hop hfx hgx
lemma is_max_filter.bicomp_mono [preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ} (hop : ((≤) ⇒ (≤) ⇒ (≤)) op op)
(hf : is_max_filter f l a) {g : α → γ} (hg : is_max_filter g l a) :
is_max_filter (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) l a :=
mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_sets hf hg) $ λ x ⟨hfx, hgx⟩, hop hfx hgx
-- No `extr` version because we need `hf` and `hg` to be of the same kind
lemma is_min_on.bicomp_mono [preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ} (hop : ((≤) ⇒ (≤) ⇒ (≤)) op op)
(hf : is_min_on f s a) {g : α → γ} (hg : is_min_on g s a) :
is_min_on (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) s a :=
hf.bicomp_mono hop hg
lemma is_max_on.bicomp_mono [preorder δ] {op : β → γ → δ} (hop : ((≤) ⇒ (≤) ⇒ (≤)) op op)
(hf : is_max_on f s a) {g : α → γ} (hg : is_max_on g s a) :
is_max_on (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) s a :=
hf.bicomp_mono hop hg
/-! ### Composition with `tendsto` -/
lemma is_min_filter.comp_tendsto {g : δ → α} {l' : filter δ} {b : δ} (hf : is_min_filter f l (g b))
(hg : tendsto g l' l) :
is_min_filter (f ∘ g) l' b :=
hg hf
lemma is_max_filter.comp_tendsto {g : δ → α} {l' : filter δ} {b : δ} (hf : is_max_filter f l (g b))
(hg : tendsto g l' l) :
is_max_filter (f ∘ g) l' b :=
hg hf
lemma is_extr_filter.comp_tendsto {g : δ → α} {l' : filter δ} {b : δ} (hf : is_extr_filter f l (g b))
(hg : tendsto g l' l) :
is_extr_filter (f ∘ g) l' b :=
hf.elim (λ hf, (hf.comp_tendsto hg).is_extr) (λ hf, (hf.comp_tendsto hg).is_extr)
lemma is_min_on.on_preimage (g : δ → α) {b : δ} (hf : is_min_on f s (g b)) :
is_min_on (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) b :=
hf.comp_tendsto (tendsto_principal_principal.mpr $ subset.refl _)
lemma is_max_on.on_preimage (g : δ → α) {b : δ} (hf : is_max_on f s (g b)) :
is_max_on (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) b :=
hf.comp_tendsto (tendsto_principal_principal.mpr $ subset.refl _)
lemma is_extr_on.on_preimage (g : δ → α) {b : δ} (hf : is_extr_on f s (g b)) :
is_extr_on (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) b :=
hf.elim (λ hf, (hf.on_preimage g).is_extr) (λ hf, (hf.on_preimage g).is_extr)
end preorder
/-! ### Pointwise addition -/
section ordered_add_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_add_comm_monoid β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter α}
lemma is_min_filter.add (hf : is_min_filter f l a) (hg : is_min_filter g l a) :
is_min_filter (λ x, f x + g x) l a :=
show is_min_filter (λ x, f x + g x) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, add_le_add' hx hy) hg
lemma is_max_filter.add (hf : is_max_filter f l a) (hg : is_max_filter g l a) :
is_max_filter (λ x, f x + g x) l a :=
show is_max_filter (λ x, f x + g x) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, add_le_add' hx hy) hg
lemma is_min_on.add (hf : is_min_on f s a) (hg : is_min_on g s a) :
is_min_on (λ x, f x + g x) s a :=
hf.add hg
lemma is_max_on.add (hf : is_max_on f s a) (hg : is_max_on g s a) :
is_max_on (λ x, f x + g x) s a :=
hf.add hg
end ordered_add_comm_monoid
/-! ### Pointwise negation and subtraction -/
section ordered_add_comm_group
variables [ordered_add_comm_group β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter α}
lemma is_min_filter.neg (hf : is_min_filter f l a) : is_max_filter (λ x, -f x) l a :=
hf.comp_antimono (λ x y hx, neg_le_neg hx)
lemma is_max_filter.neg (hf : is_max_filter f l a) : is_min_filter (λ x, -f x) l a :=
hf.comp_antimono (λ x y hx, neg_le_neg hx)
lemma is_extr_filter.neg (hf : is_extr_filter f l a) : is_extr_filter (λ x, -f x) l a :=
hf.elim (λ hf, hf.neg.is_extr) (λ hf, hf.neg.is_extr)
lemma is_min_on.neg (hf : is_min_on f s a) : is_max_on (λ x, -f x) s a :=
hf.comp_antimono (λ x y hx, neg_le_neg hx)
lemma is_max_on.neg (hf : is_max_on f s a) : is_min_on (λ x, -f x) s a :=
hf.comp_antimono (λ x y hx, neg_le_neg hx)
lemma is_extr_on.neg (hf : is_extr_on f s a) : is_extr_on (λ x, -f x) s a :=
hf.elim (λ hf, hf.neg.is_extr) (λ hf, hf.neg.is_extr)
lemma is_min_filter.sub (hf : is_min_filter f l a) (hg : is_max_filter g l a) :
is_min_filter (λ x, f x - g x) l a :=
hf.add hg.neg
lemma is_max_filter.sub (hf : is_max_filter f l a) (hg : is_min_filter g l a) :
is_max_filter (λ x, f x - g x) l a :=
hf.add hg.neg
lemma is_min_on.sub (hf : is_min_on f s a) (hg : is_max_on g s a) :
is_min_on (λ x, f x - g x) s a :=
hf.add hg.neg
lemma is_max_on.sub (hf : is_max_on f s a) (hg : is_min_on g s a) :
is_max_on (λ x, f x - g x) s a :=
hf.add hg.neg
end ordered_add_comm_group
/-! ### Pointwise `sup`/`inf` -/
section semilattice_sup
variables [semilattice_sup β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter α}
lemma is_min_filter.sup (hf : is_min_filter f l a) (hg : is_min_filter g l a) :
is_min_filter (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) l a :=
show is_min_filter (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, sup_le_sup hx hy) hg
lemma is_max_filter.sup (hf : is_max_filter f l a) (hg : is_max_filter g l a) :
is_max_filter (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) l a :=
show is_max_filter (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, sup_le_sup hx hy) hg
lemma is_min_on.sup (hf : is_min_on f s a) (hg : is_min_on g s a) :
is_min_on (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) s a :=
hf.sup hg
lemma is_max_on.sup (hf : is_max_on f s a) (hg : is_max_on g s a) :
is_max_on (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) s a :=
hf.sup hg
end semilattice_sup
section semilattice_inf
variables [semilattice_inf β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter α}
lemma is_min_filter.inf (hf : is_min_filter f l a) (hg : is_min_filter g l a) :
is_min_filter (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) l a :=
show is_min_filter (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, inf_le_inf hx hy) hg
lemma is_max_filter.inf (hf : is_max_filter f l a) (hg : is_max_filter g l a) :
is_max_filter (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) l a :=
show is_max_filter (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, inf_le_inf hx hy) hg
lemma is_min_on.inf (hf : is_min_on f s a) (hg : is_min_on g s a) :
is_min_on (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) s a :=
hf.inf hg
lemma is_max_on.inf (hf : is_max_on f s a) (hg : is_max_on g s a) :
is_max_on (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) s a :=
hf.inf hg
end semilattice_inf
/-! ### Pointwise `min`/`max` -/
section decidable_linear_order
variables [decidable_linear_order β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter α}
lemma is_min_filter.min (hf : is_min_filter f l a) (hg : is_min_filter g l a) :
is_min_filter (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) l a :=
show is_min_filter (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, min_le_min hx hy) hg
lemma is_max_filter.min (hf : is_max_filter f l a) (hg : is_max_filter g l a) :
is_max_filter (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) l a :=
show is_max_filter (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, min_le_min hx hy) hg
lemma is_min_on.min (hf : is_min_on f s a) (hg : is_min_on g s a) :
is_min_on (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) s a :=
hf.min hg
lemma is_max_on.min (hf : is_max_on f s a) (hg : is_max_on g s a) :
is_max_on (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) s a :=
hf.min hg
lemma is_min_filter.max (hf : is_min_filter f l a) (hg : is_min_filter g l a) :
is_min_filter (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) l a :=
show is_min_filter (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, max_le_max hx hy) hg
lemma is_max_filter.max (hf : is_max_filter f l a) (hg : is_max_filter g l a) :
is_max_filter (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) l a :=
show is_max_filter (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) l a,
from hf.bicomp_mono (λ x x' hx y y' hy, max_le_max hx hy) hg
lemma is_min_on.max (hf : is_min_on f s a) (hg : is_min_on g s a) :
is_min_on (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) s a :=
hf.max hg
lemma is_max_on.max (hf : is_max_on f s a) (hg : is_max_on g s a) :
is_max_on (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) s a :=
hf.max hg
end decidable_linear_order
|
7cb31f47549ac1e1b44f9be554994a15b2c8f16d | 6094e25ea0b7699e642463b48e51b2ead6ddc23f | /library/algebra/ordered_ring.lean | 1379dde85741884ee56a4150699e7383061deb43 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gbaz/lean | a7835c4e3006fbbb079e8f8ffe18aacc45adebfb | a501c308be3acaa50a2c0610ce2e0d71becf8032 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,198,791,433 | 1,451,339,111,000 | 1,451,339,111,000 | 48,713,797 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,451,338,939,000 | 1,451,338,939,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,565 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
Here an "ordered_ring" is partially ordered ring, which is ordered with respect to both a weak
order and an associated strict order. Our numeric structures (int, rat, and real) will be instances
of "linear_ordered_comm_ring". This development is modeled after Isabelle's library.
-/
import algebra.ordered_group algebra.ring
open eq eq.ops
variable {A : Type}
private definition absurd_a_lt_a {B : Type} {a : A} [s : strict_order A] (H : a < a) : B :=
absurd H (lt.irrefl a)
/- semiring structures -/
structure ordered_semiring [class] (A : Type)
extends semiring A, ordered_cancel_comm_monoid A :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left: ∀a b c, le a b → le zero c → le (mul c a) (mul c b))
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right: ∀a b c, le a b → le zero c → le (mul a c) (mul b c))
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left: ∀a b c, lt a b → lt zero c → lt (mul c a) (mul c b))
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right: ∀a b c, lt a b → lt zero c → lt (mul a c) (mul b c))
section
variable [s : ordered_semiring A]
variables (a b c d e : A)
include s
theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left {a b c : A} (Hab : a ≤ b) (Hc : 0 ≤ c) :
c * a ≤ c * b := !ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left Hab Hc
theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right {a b c : A} (Hab : a ≤ b) (Hc : 0 ≤ c) :
a * c ≤ b * c := !ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right Hab Hc
-- TODO: there are four variations, depending on which variables we assume to be nonneg
theorem mul_le_mul {a b c d : A} (Hac : a ≤ c) (Hbd : b ≤ d) (nn_b : 0 ≤ b) (nn_c : 0 ≤ c) :
a * b ≤ c * d :=
calc
a * b ≤ c * b : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right Hac nn_b
... ≤ c * d : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left Hbd nn_c
theorem mul_nonneg {a b : A} (Ha : a ≥ 0) (Hb : b ≥ 0) : a * b ≥ 0 :=
begin
have H : 0 * b ≤ a * b, from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right Ha Hb,
rewrite zero_mul at H,
exact H
end
theorem mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos {a b : A} (Ha : a ≥ 0) (Hb : b ≤ 0) : a * b ≤ 0 :=
begin
have H : a * b ≤ a * 0, from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left Hb Ha,
rewrite mul_zero at H,
exact H
end
theorem mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg {a b : A} (Ha : a ≤ 0) (Hb : b ≥ 0) : a * b ≤ 0 :=
begin
have H : a * b ≤ 0 * b, from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right Ha Hb,
rewrite zero_mul at H,
exact H
end
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : A} (Hab : a < b) (Hc : 0 < c) :
c * a < c * b := !ordered_semiring.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Hab Hc
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right {a b c : A} (Hab : a < b) (Hc : 0 < c) :
a * c < b * c := !ordered_semiring.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right Hab Hc
-- TODO: once again, there are variations
theorem mul_lt_mul {a b c d : A} (Hac : a < c) (Hbd : b ≤ d) (pos_b : 0 < b) (nn_c : 0 ≤ c) :
a * b < c * d :=
calc
a * b < c * b : mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right Hac pos_b
... ≤ c * d : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left Hbd nn_c
theorem mul_pos {a b : A} (Ha : a > 0) (Hb : b > 0) : a * b > 0 :=
begin
have H : 0 * b < a * b, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right Ha Hb,
rewrite zero_mul at H,
exact H
end
theorem mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg {a b : A} (Ha : a > 0) (Hb : b < 0) : a * b < 0 :=
begin
have H : a * b < a * 0, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Hb Ha,
rewrite mul_zero at H,
exact H
end
theorem mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos {a b : A} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : b > 0) : a * b < 0 :=
begin
have H : a * b < 0 * b, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right Ha Hb,
rewrite zero_mul at H,
exact H
end
end
structure linear_ordered_semiring [class] (A : Type)
extends ordered_semiring A, linear_strong_order_pair A :=
(zero_lt_one : lt zero one)
section
variable [s : linear_ordered_semiring A]
variables {a b c : A}
include s
theorem zero_lt_one : 0 < (1:A) := linear_ordered_semiring.zero_lt_one A
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (H : c * a < c * b) (Hc : c ≥ 0) : a < b :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume H1 : b ≤ a,
have H2 : c * b ≤ c * a, from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left H1 Hc,
not_lt_of_ge H2 H)
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right (H : a * c < b * c) (Hc : c ≥ 0) : a < b :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume H1 : b ≤ a,
have H2 : b * c ≤ a * c, from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H1 Hc,
not_lt_of_ge H2 H)
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left (H : c * a ≤ c * b) (Hc : c > 0) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_gt
(assume H1 : b < a,
have H2 : c * b < c * a, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left H1 Hc,
not_le_of_gt H2 H)
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_right (H : a * c ≤ b * c) (Hc : c > 0) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_gt
(assume H1 : b < a,
have H2 : b * c < a * c, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right H1 Hc,
not_le_of_gt H2 H)
theorem le_iff_mul_le_mul_left (a b : A) {c : A} (H : c > 0) : a ≤ b ↔ c * a ≤ c * b :=
iff.intro
(assume H', mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left H' (le_of_lt H))
(assume H', le_of_mul_le_mul_left H' H)
theorem le_iff_mul_le_mul_right (a b : A) {c : A} (H : c > 0) : a ≤ b ↔ a * c ≤ b * c :=
iff.intro
(assume H', mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H' (le_of_lt H))
(assume H', le_of_mul_le_mul_right H' H)
theorem pos_of_mul_pos_left (H : 0 < a * b) (H1 : 0 ≤ a) : 0 < b :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume H2 : b ≤ 0,
have H3 : a * b ≤ 0, from mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos H1 H2,
not_lt_of_ge H3 H)
theorem pos_of_mul_pos_right (H : 0 < a * b) (H1 : 0 ≤ b) : 0 < a :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume H2 : a ≤ 0,
have H3 : a * b ≤ 0, from mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg H2 H1,
not_lt_of_ge H3 H)
theorem nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left (H : 0 ≤ a * b) (H1 : 0 < a) : 0 ≤ b :=
le_of_not_gt
(assume H2 : b < 0,
not_le_of_gt (mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg H1 H2) H)
theorem nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right (H : 0 ≤ a * b) (H1 : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a :=
le_of_not_gt
(assume H2 : a < 0,
not_le_of_gt (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos H2 H1) H)
theorem neg_of_mul_neg_left (H : a * b < 0) (H1 : 0 ≤ a) : b < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume H2 : b ≥ 0,
not_lt_of_ge (mul_nonneg H1 H2) H)
theorem neg_of_mul_neg_right (H : a * b < 0) (H1 : 0 ≤ b) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume H2 : a ≥ 0,
not_lt_of_ge (mul_nonneg H2 H1) H)
theorem nonpos_of_mul_nonpos_left (H : a * b ≤ 0) (H1 : 0 < a) : b ≤ 0 :=
le_of_not_gt
(assume H2 : b > 0,
not_le_of_gt (mul_pos H1 H2) H)
theorem nonpos_of_mul_nonpos_right (H : a * b ≤ 0) (H1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ 0 :=
le_of_not_gt
(assume H2 : a > 0,
not_le_of_gt (mul_pos H2 H1) H)
end
structure decidable_linear_ordered_semiring [class] (A : Type)
extends linear_ordered_semiring A, decidable_linear_order A
/- ring structures -/
structure ordered_ring [class] (A : Type)
extends ring A, ordered_comm_group A, zero_ne_one_class A :=
(mul_nonneg : ∀a b, le zero a → le zero b → le zero (mul a b))
(mul_pos : ∀a b, lt zero a → lt zero b → lt zero (mul a b))
theorem ordered_ring.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left [s : ordered_ring A] {a b c : A}
(Hab : a ≤ b) (Hc : 0 ≤ c) : c * a ≤ c * b :=
have H1 : 0 ≤ b - a, from iff.elim_right !sub_nonneg_iff_le Hab,
assert H2 : 0 ≤ c * (b - a), from ordered_ring.mul_nonneg _ _ Hc H1,
begin
rewrite mul_sub_left_distrib at H2,
exact (iff.mp !sub_nonneg_iff_le H2)
end
theorem ordered_ring.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right [s : ordered_ring A] {a b c : A}
(Hab : a ≤ b) (Hc : 0 ≤ c) : a * c ≤ b * c :=
have H1 : 0 ≤ b - a, from iff.elim_right !sub_nonneg_iff_le Hab,
assert H2 : 0 ≤ (b - a) * c, from ordered_ring.mul_nonneg _ _ H1 Hc,
begin
rewrite mul_sub_right_distrib at H2,
exact (iff.mp !sub_nonneg_iff_le H2)
end
theorem ordered_ring.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left [s : ordered_ring A] {a b c : A}
(Hab : a < b) (Hc : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
have H1 : 0 < b - a, from iff.elim_right !sub_pos_iff_lt Hab,
assert H2 : 0 < c * (b - a), from ordered_ring.mul_pos _ _ Hc H1,
begin
rewrite mul_sub_left_distrib at H2,
exact (iff.mp !sub_pos_iff_lt H2)
end
theorem ordered_ring.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right [s : ordered_ring A] {a b c : A}
(Hab : a < b) (Hc : 0 < c) : a * c < b * c :=
have H1 : 0 < b - a, from iff.elim_right !sub_pos_iff_lt Hab,
assert H2 : 0 < (b - a) * c, from ordered_ring.mul_pos _ _ H1 Hc,
begin
rewrite mul_sub_right_distrib at H2,
exact (iff.mp !sub_pos_iff_lt H2)
end
definition ordered_ring.to_ordered_semiring [trans_instance] [reducible]
[s : ordered_ring A] :
ordered_semiring A :=
⦃ ordered_semiring, s,
mul_zero := mul_zero,
zero_mul := zero_mul,
add_left_cancel := @add.left_cancel A _,
add_right_cancel := @add.right_cancel A _,
le_of_add_le_add_left := @le_of_add_le_add_left A _,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left := @ordered_ring.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left A _,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right := @ordered_ring.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right A _,
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := @ordered_ring.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left A _,
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := @ordered_ring.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right A _,
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := @lt_of_add_lt_add_left A _⦄
section
variable [s : ordered_ring A]
variables {a b c : A}
include s
theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left (H : b ≤ a) (Hc : c ≤ 0) : c * a ≤ c * b :=
have Hc' : -c ≥ 0, from iff.mpr !neg_nonneg_iff_nonpos Hc,
assert H1 : -c * b ≤ -c * a, from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left H Hc',
have H2 : -(c * b) ≤ -(c * a),
begin
rewrite [-*neg_mul_eq_neg_mul at H1],
exact H1
end,
iff.mp !neg_le_neg_iff_le H2
theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right (H : b ≤ a) (Hc : c ≤ 0) : a * c ≤ b * c :=
have Hc' : -c ≥ 0, from iff.mpr !neg_nonneg_iff_nonpos Hc,
assert H1 : b * -c ≤ a * -c, from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H Hc',
have H2 : -(b * c) ≤ -(a * c),
begin
rewrite [-*neg_mul_eq_mul_neg at H1],
exact H1
end,
iff.mp !neg_le_neg_iff_le H2
theorem mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (Ha : a ≤ 0) (Hb : b ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a * b :=
begin
have H : 0 * b ≤ a * b, from mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right Ha Hb,
rewrite zero_mul at H,
exact H
end
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left (H : b < a) (Hc : c < 0) : c * a < c * b :=
have Hc' : -c > 0, from iff.mpr !neg_pos_iff_neg Hc,
assert H1 : -c * b < -c * a, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left H Hc',
have H2 : -(c * b) < -(c * a),
begin
rewrite [-*neg_mul_eq_neg_mul at H1],
exact H1
end,
iff.mp !neg_lt_neg_iff_lt H2
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right (H : b < a) (Hc : c < 0) : a * c < b * c :=
have Hc' : -c > 0, from iff.mpr !neg_pos_iff_neg Hc,
assert H1 : b * -c < a * -c, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right H Hc',
have H2 : -(b * c) < -(a * c),
begin
rewrite [-*neg_mul_eq_mul_neg at H1],
exact H1
end,
iff.mp !neg_lt_neg_iff_lt H2
theorem mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : b < 0) : 0 < a * b :=
begin
have H : 0 * b < a * b, from mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right Ha Hb,
rewrite zero_mul at H,
exact H
end
end
-- TODO: we can eliminate mul_pos_of_pos, but now it is not worth the effort to redeclare the
-- class instance
structure linear_ordered_ring [class] (A : Type)
extends ordered_ring A, linear_strong_order_pair A :=
(zero_lt_one : lt zero one)
definition linear_ordered_ring.to_linear_ordered_semiring [trans_instance] [reducible]
[s : linear_ordered_ring A] :
linear_ordered_semiring A :=
⦃ linear_ordered_semiring, s,
mul_zero := mul_zero,
zero_mul := zero_mul,
add_left_cancel := @add.left_cancel A _,
add_right_cancel := @add.right_cancel A _,
le_of_add_le_add_left := @le_of_add_le_add_left A _,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left := @mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left A _,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right := @mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right A _,
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := @mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left A _,
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := @mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right A _,
le_total := linear_ordered_ring.le_total,
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := @lt_of_add_lt_add_left A _ ⦄
structure linear_ordered_comm_ring [class] (A : Type) extends linear_ordered_ring A, comm_monoid A
theorem linear_ordered_comm_ring.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero [s : linear_ordered_comm_ring A]
{a b : A} (H : a * b = 0) : a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
lt.by_cases
(assume Ha : 0 < a,
lt.by_cases
(assume Hb : 0 < b,
begin
have H1 : 0 < a * b, from mul_pos Ha Hb,
rewrite H at H1,
apply absurd_a_lt_a H1
end)
(assume Hb : 0 = b, or.inr (Hb⁻¹))
(assume Hb : 0 > b,
begin
have H1 : 0 > a * b, from mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg Ha Hb,
rewrite H at H1,
apply absurd_a_lt_a H1
end))
(assume Ha : 0 = a, or.inl (Ha⁻¹))
(assume Ha : 0 > a,
lt.by_cases
(assume Hb : 0 < b,
begin
have H1 : 0 > a * b, from mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos Ha Hb,
rewrite H at H1,
apply absurd_a_lt_a H1
end)
(assume Hb : 0 = b, or.inr (Hb⁻¹))
(assume Hb : 0 > b,
begin
have H1 : 0 < a * b, from mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg Ha Hb,
rewrite H at H1,
apply absurd_a_lt_a H1
end))
-- Linearity implies no zero divisors. Doesn't need commutativity.
definition linear_ordered_comm_ring.to_integral_domain [trans_instance] [reducible]
[s: linear_ordered_comm_ring A] : integral_domain A :=
⦃ integral_domain, s,
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero :=
@linear_ordered_comm_ring.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero A s ⦄
section
variable [s : linear_ordered_ring A]
variables (a b c : A)
include s
theorem mul_self_nonneg : a * a ≥ 0 :=
or.elim (le.total 0 a)
(assume H : a ≥ 0, mul_nonneg H H)
(assume H : a ≤ 0, mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos H H)
theorem zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1:A) := one_mul 1 ▸ mul_self_nonneg 1
theorem pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_mul_pos {a b : A} (Hab : a * b > 0) :
(a > 0 ∧ b > 0) ∨ (a < 0 ∧ b < 0) :=
lt.by_cases
(assume Ha : 0 < a,
lt.by_cases
(assume Hb : 0 < b, or.inl (and.intro Ha Hb))
(assume Hb : 0 = b,
begin
rewrite [-Hb at Hab, mul_zero at Hab],
apply absurd_a_lt_a Hab
end)
(assume Hb : b < 0,
absurd Hab (lt.asymm (mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg Ha Hb))))
(assume Ha : 0 = a,
begin
rewrite [-Ha at Hab, zero_mul at Hab],
apply absurd_a_lt_a Hab
end)
(assume Ha : a < 0,
lt.by_cases
(assume Hb : 0 < b,
absurd Hab (lt.asymm (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos Ha Hb)))
(assume Hb : 0 = b,
begin
rewrite [-Hb at Hab, mul_zero at Hab],
apply absurd_a_lt_a Hab
end)
(assume Hb : b < 0, or.inr (and.intro Ha Hb)))
theorem gt_of_mul_lt_mul_neg_left {a b c : A} (H : c * a < c * b) (Hc : c ≤ 0) : a > b :=
have nhc : -c ≥ 0, from neg_nonneg_of_nonpos Hc,
have H2 : -(c * b) < -(c * a), from iff.mpr (neg_lt_neg_iff_lt _ _) H,
have H3 : (-c) * b < (-c) * a, from calc
(-c) * b = - (c * b) : neg_mul_eq_neg_mul
... < -(c * a) : H2
... = (-c) * a : neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left H3 nhc
theorem zero_gt_neg_one : -1 < (0:A) :=
neg_zero ▸ (neg_lt_neg zero_lt_one)
theorem le_of_mul_le_of_ge_one {a b c : A} (H : a * c ≤ b) (Hb : b ≥ 0) (Hc : c ≥ 1) : a ≤ b :=
have H' : a * c ≤ b * c, from calc
a * c ≤ b : H
... = b * 1 : mul_one
... ≤ b * c : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left Hc Hb,
le_of_mul_le_mul_right H' (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one Hc)
theorem nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le {a b : A} (Ha : a ≥ 0) (Hb : b ≥ 0) (H : a * a ≤ b * b) :
a ≤ b :=
begin
apply le_of_not_gt,
intro Hab,
note Hposa := lt_of_le_of_lt Hb Hab,
note H' := calc
b * b ≤ a * b : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_of_lt Hab) Hb
... < a * a : mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Hab Hposa,
apply (not_le_of_gt H') H
end
end
/- TODO: Isabelle's library has all kinds of cancelation rules for the simplifier.
Search on mult_le_cancel_right1 in Rings.thy. -/
structure decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring [class] (A : Type) extends linear_ordered_comm_ring A,
decidable_linear_ordered_comm_group A
section
variable [s : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring A]
variables {a b c : A}
include s
definition sign (a : A) : A := lt.cases a 0 (-1) 0 1
theorem sign_of_neg (H : a < 0) : sign a = -1 := lt.cases_of_lt H
theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = (0:A) := lt.cases_of_eq rfl
theorem sign_of_pos (H : a > 0) : sign a = 1 := lt.cases_of_gt H
theorem sign_one : sign 1 = (1:A) := sign_of_pos zero_lt_one
theorem sign_neg_one : sign (-1) = -(1:A) := sign_of_neg (neg_neg_of_pos zero_lt_one)
theorem sign_sign (a : A) : sign (sign a) = sign a :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H : a > 0,
calc
sign (sign a) = sign 1 : by rewrite (sign_of_pos H)
... = 1 : by rewrite sign_one
... = sign a : by rewrite (sign_of_pos H))
(assume H : 0 = a,
calc
sign (sign a) = sign (sign 0) : by rewrite H
... = sign 0 : by rewrite sign_zero at {1}
... = sign a : by rewrite -H)
(assume H : a < 0,
calc
sign (sign a) = sign (-1) : by rewrite (sign_of_neg H)
... = -1 : by rewrite sign_neg_one
... = sign a : by rewrite (sign_of_neg H))
theorem pos_of_sign_eq_one (H : sign a = 1) : a > 0 :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H1 : 0 < a, H1)
(assume H1 : 0 = a,
begin
rewrite [-H1 at H, sign_zero at H],
apply absurd H zero_ne_one
end)
(assume H1 : 0 > a,
have H2 : -1 = 1, from (sign_of_neg H1)⁻¹ ⬝ H,
absurd ((eq_zero_of_neg_eq H2)⁻¹) zero_ne_one)
theorem eq_zero_of_sign_eq_zero (H : sign a = 0) : a = 0 :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H1 : 0 < a,
absurd (H⁻¹ ⬝ sign_of_pos H1) zero_ne_one)
(assume H1 : 0 = a, H1⁻¹)
(assume H1 : 0 > a,
have H2 : 0 = -1, from H⁻¹ ⬝ sign_of_neg H1,
have H3 : 1 = 0, from eq_neg_of_eq_neg H2 ⬝ neg_zero,
absurd (H3⁻¹) zero_ne_one)
theorem neg_of_sign_eq_neg_one (H : sign a = -1) : a < 0 :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H1 : 0 < a,
have H2 : -1 = 1, from H⁻¹ ⬝ (sign_of_pos H1),
absurd ((eq_zero_of_neg_eq H2)⁻¹) zero_ne_one)
(assume H1 : 0 = a,
have H2 : (0:A) = -1,
begin
rewrite [-H1 at H, sign_zero at H],
exact H
end,
have H3 : 1 = 0, from eq_neg_of_eq_neg H2 ⬝ neg_zero,
absurd (H3⁻¹) zero_ne_one)
(assume H1 : 0 > a, H1)
theorem sign_neg (a : A) : sign (-a) = -(sign a) :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H1 : 0 < a,
calc
sign (-a) = -1 : sign_of_neg (neg_neg_of_pos H1)
... = -(sign a) : by rewrite (sign_of_pos H1))
(assume H1 : 0 = a,
calc
sign (-a) = sign (-0) : by rewrite H1
... = sign 0 : by rewrite neg_zero
... = 0 : by rewrite sign_zero
... = -0 : by rewrite neg_zero
... = -(sign 0) : by rewrite sign_zero
... = -(sign a) : by rewrite -H1)
(assume H1 : 0 > a,
calc
sign (-a) = 1 : sign_of_pos (neg_pos_of_neg H1)
... = -(-1) : by rewrite neg_neg
... = -(sign a) : sign_of_neg H1)
theorem sign_mul (a b : A) : sign (a * b) = sign a * sign b :=
lt.by_cases
(assume z_lt_a : 0 < a,
lt.by_cases
(assume z_lt_b : 0 < b,
by rewrite [sign_of_pos z_lt_a, sign_of_pos z_lt_b,
sign_of_pos (mul_pos z_lt_a z_lt_b), one_mul])
(assume z_eq_b : 0 = b, by rewrite [-z_eq_b, mul_zero, *sign_zero, mul_zero])
(assume z_gt_b : 0 > b,
by rewrite [sign_of_pos z_lt_a, sign_of_neg z_gt_b,
sign_of_neg (mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg z_lt_a z_gt_b), one_mul]))
(assume z_eq_a : 0 = a, by rewrite [-z_eq_a, zero_mul, *sign_zero, zero_mul])
(assume z_gt_a : 0 > a,
lt.by_cases
(assume z_lt_b : 0 < b,
by rewrite [sign_of_neg z_gt_a, sign_of_pos z_lt_b,
sign_of_neg (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos z_gt_a z_lt_b), mul_one])
(assume z_eq_b : 0 = b, by rewrite [-z_eq_b, mul_zero, *sign_zero, mul_zero])
(assume z_gt_b : 0 > b,
by rewrite [sign_of_neg z_gt_a, sign_of_neg z_gt_b,
sign_of_pos (mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg z_gt_a z_gt_b),
neg_mul_neg, one_mul]))
theorem abs_eq_sign_mul (a : A) : abs a = sign a * a :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H1 : 0 < a,
calc
abs a = a : abs_of_pos H1
... = 1 * a : by rewrite one_mul
... = sign a * a : by rewrite (sign_of_pos H1))
(assume H1 : 0 = a,
calc
abs a = abs 0 : by rewrite H1
... = 0 : by rewrite abs_zero
... = 0 * a : by rewrite zero_mul
... = sign 0 * a : by rewrite sign_zero
... = sign a * a : by rewrite H1)
(assume H1 : a < 0,
calc
abs a = -a : abs_of_neg H1
... = -1 * a : by rewrite neg_eq_neg_one_mul
... = sign a * a : by rewrite (sign_of_neg H1))
theorem eq_sign_mul_abs (a : A) : a = sign a * abs a :=
lt.by_cases
(assume H1 : 0 < a,
calc
a = abs a : abs_of_pos H1
... = 1 * abs a : by rewrite one_mul
... = sign a * abs a : by rewrite (sign_of_pos H1))
(assume H1 : 0 = a,
calc
a = 0 : H1⁻¹
... = 0 * abs a : by rewrite zero_mul
... = sign 0 * abs a : by rewrite sign_zero
... = sign a * abs a : by rewrite H1)
(assume H1 : a < 0,
calc
a = -(-a) : by rewrite neg_neg
... = -abs a : by rewrite (abs_of_neg H1)
... = -1 * abs a : by rewrite neg_eq_neg_one_mul
... = sign a * abs a : by rewrite (sign_of_neg H1))
theorem abs_dvd_iff (a b : A) : abs a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
abs.by_cases !iff.refl !neg_dvd_iff_dvd
theorem abs_dvd_of_dvd {a b : A} : a ∣ b → abs a ∣ b :=
iff.mpr !abs_dvd_iff
theorem dvd_abs_iff (a b : A) : a ∣ abs b ↔ a ∣ b :=
abs.by_cases !iff.refl !dvd_neg_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_abs_of_dvd {a b : A} : a ∣ b → a ∣ abs b :=
iff.mpr !dvd_abs_iff
theorem abs_mul (a b : A) : abs (a * b) = abs a * abs b :=
or.elim (le.total 0 a)
(assume H1 : 0 ≤ a,
or.elim (le.total 0 b)
(assume H2 : 0 ≤ b,
calc
abs (a * b) = a * b : abs_of_nonneg (mul_nonneg H1 H2)
... = abs a * b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H1)
... = abs a * abs b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H2))
(assume H2 : b ≤ 0,
calc
abs (a * b) = -(a * b) : abs_of_nonpos (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos H1 H2)
... = a * -b : by rewrite neg_mul_eq_mul_neg
... = abs a * -b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H1)
... = abs a * abs b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonpos H2)))
(assume H1 : a ≤ 0,
or.elim (le.total 0 b)
(assume H2 : 0 ≤ b,
calc
abs (a * b) = -(a * b) : abs_of_nonpos (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg H1 H2)
... = -a * b : by rewrite neg_mul_eq_neg_mul
... = abs a * b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonpos H1)
... = abs a * abs b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonneg H2))
(assume H2 : b ≤ 0,
calc
abs (a * b) = a * b : abs_of_nonneg (mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos H1 H2)
... = -a * -b : by rewrite neg_mul_neg
... = abs a * -b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonpos H1)
... = abs a * abs b : by rewrite (abs_of_nonpos H2)))
theorem abs_mul_abs_self (a : A) : abs a * abs a = a * a :=
abs.by_cases rfl !neg_mul_neg
theorem abs_mul_self (a : A) : abs (a * a) = a * a :=
by rewrite [abs_mul, abs_mul_abs_self]
theorem sub_le_of_abs_sub_le_left (H : abs (a - b) ≤ c) : b - c ≤ a :=
if Hz : 0 ≤ a - b then
(calc
a ≥ b : (iff.mp !sub_nonneg_iff_le) Hz
... ≥ b - c : sub_le_of_nonneg _ (le.trans !abs_nonneg H))
else
(have Habs : b - a ≤ c, by rewrite [abs_of_neg (lt_of_not_ge Hz) at H, neg_sub at H]; apply H,
have Habs' : b ≤ c + a, from (iff.mpr !le_add_iff_sub_right_le) Habs,
(iff.mp !le_add_iff_sub_left_le) Habs')
theorem sub_le_of_abs_sub_le_right (H : abs (a - b) ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b :=
sub_le_of_abs_sub_le_left (!abs_sub ▸ H)
theorem sub_lt_of_abs_sub_lt_left (H : abs (a - b) < c) : b - c < a :=
if Hz : 0 ≤ a - b then
(calc
a ≥ b : (iff.mp !sub_nonneg_iff_le) Hz
... > b - c : sub_lt_of_pos _ (lt_of_le_of_lt !abs_nonneg H))
else
(have Habs : b - a < c, by rewrite [abs_of_neg (lt_of_not_ge Hz) at H, neg_sub at H]; apply H,
have Habs' : b < c + a, from lt_add_of_sub_lt_right Habs,
sub_lt_left_of_lt_add Habs')
theorem sub_lt_of_abs_sub_lt_right (H : abs (a - b) < c) : a - c < b :=
sub_lt_of_abs_sub_lt_left (!abs_sub ▸ H)
theorem abs_sub_square (a b : A) : abs (a - b) * abs (a - b) = a * a + b * b - (1 + 1) * a * b :=
begin
rewrite [abs_mul_abs_self, *mul_sub_left_distrib, *mul_sub_right_distrib,
sub_eq_add_neg (a*b), sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, *right_distrib, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, *one_mul,
*add.assoc, {_ + b * b}add.comm, *sub_eq_add_neg],
rewrite [{a*a + b*b}add.comm],
rewrite [mul.comm b a, *add.assoc]
end
theorem abs_abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub (a b : A) : abs (abs a - abs b) ≤ abs (a - b) :=
begin
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le,
repeat apply abs_nonneg,
rewrite [*abs_sub_square, *abs_abs, *abs_mul_abs_self],
apply sub_le_sub_left,
rewrite *mul.assoc,
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left,
rewrite -abs_mul,
apply le_abs_self,
apply le_of_lt,
apply add_pos,
apply zero_lt_one,
apply zero_lt_one
end
end
/- TODO: Multiplication and one, starting with mult_right_le_one_le. -/
namespace norm_num
theorem pos_bit0_helper [s : linear_ordered_semiring A] (a : A) (H : a > 0) : bit0 a > 0 :=
by rewrite ↑bit0; apply add_pos H H
theorem nonneg_bit0_helper [s : linear_ordered_semiring A] (a : A) (H : a ≥ 0) : bit0 a ≥ 0 :=
by rewrite ↑bit0; apply add_nonneg H H
theorem pos_bit1_helper [s : linear_ordered_semiring A] (a : A) (H : a ≥ 0) : bit1 a > 0 :=
begin
rewrite ↑bit1,
apply add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos,
apply nonneg_bit0_helper _ H,
apply zero_lt_one
end
theorem nonneg_bit1_helper [s : linear_ordered_semiring A] (a : A) (H : a ≥ 0) : bit1 a ≥ 0 :=
by apply le_of_lt; apply pos_bit1_helper _ H
theorem nonzero_of_pos_helper [s : linear_ordered_semiring A] (a : A) (H : a > 0) : a ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt H
theorem nonzero_of_neg_helper [s : linear_ordered_ring A] (a : A) (H : a ≠ 0) : -a ≠ 0 :=
begin intro Ha, apply H, apply eq_of_neg_eq_neg, rewrite neg_zero, exact Ha end
end norm_num
|
0113c9b1bca5e400783f7329127f1b44fc32ed92 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/linear_algebra/matrix/reindex.lean | cca2c1b3d737a19859d6679f0b2dc85a3d5e0003 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,436 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import linear_algebra.matrix.determinant
/-!
# Changing the index type of a matrix
This file concerns the map `matrix.reindex`, mapping a `m` by `n` matrix
to an `m'` by `n'` matrix, as long as `m ≃ m'` and `n ≃ n'`.
## Main definitions
* `matrix.reindex_linear_equiv R A`: `matrix.reindex` is an `R`-linear equivalence between
`A`-matrices.
* `matrix.reindex_alg_equiv R`: `matrix.reindex` is an `R`-algebra equivalence between `R`-matrices.
## Tags
matrix, reindex
-/
namespace matrix
open equiv
open_locale matrix
variables {l m n o : Type*} {l' m' n' o' : Type*} {m'' n'' : Type*}
variables (R A : Type*)
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid A] [module R A]
/-- The natural map that reindexes a matrix's rows and columns with equivalent types,
`matrix.reindex`, is a linear equivalence. -/
def reindex_linear_equiv (eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') : matrix m n A ≃ₗ[R] matrix m' n' A :=
{ map_add' := λ _ _, rfl,
map_smul' := λ _ _, rfl,
..(reindex eₘ eₙ)}
@[simp] lemma reindex_linear_equiv_apply
(eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (M : matrix m n A) :
reindex_linear_equiv R A eₘ eₙ M = reindex eₘ eₙ M :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_linear_equiv_symm (eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') :
(reindex_linear_equiv R A eₘ eₙ).symm = reindex_linear_equiv R A eₘ.symm eₙ.symm :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_linear_equiv_refl_refl :
reindex_linear_equiv R A (equiv.refl m) (equiv.refl n) = linear_equiv.refl R _ :=
linear_equiv.ext $ λ _, rfl
lemma reindex_linear_equiv_trans (e₁ : m ≃ m') (e₂ : n ≃ n') (e₁' : m' ≃ m'')
(e₂' : n' ≃ n'') : (reindex_linear_equiv R A e₁ e₂).trans (reindex_linear_equiv R A e₁' e₂') =
(reindex_linear_equiv R A (e₁.trans e₁') (e₂.trans e₂') : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
by { ext, refl }
lemma reindex_linear_equiv_comp (e₁ : m ≃ m') (e₂ : n ≃ n') (e₁' : m' ≃ m'')
(e₂' : n' ≃ n'') :
(reindex_linear_equiv R A e₁' e₂') ∘ (reindex_linear_equiv R A e₁ e₂)
= reindex_linear_equiv R A (e₁.trans e₁') (e₂.trans e₂') :=
by { rw [← reindex_linear_equiv_trans], refl }
lemma reindex_linear_equiv_comp_apply (e₁ : m ≃ m') (e₂ : n ≃ n') (e₁' : m' ≃ m'')
(e₂' : n' ≃ n'') (M : matrix m n A) :
(reindex_linear_equiv R A e₁' e₂') (reindex_linear_equiv R A e₁ e₂ M) =
reindex_linear_equiv R A (e₁.trans e₁') (e₂.trans e₂') M :=
minor_minor _ _ _ _ _
lemma reindex_linear_equiv_one [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq m'] [has_one A]
(e : m ≃ m') : (reindex_linear_equiv R A e e (1 : matrix m m A)) = 1 :=
minor_one_equiv e.symm
end add_comm_monoid
section semiring
variables [semiring R] [semiring A] [module R A]
lemma reindex_linear_equiv_mul [fintype n] [fintype n']
(eₘ : m ≃ m') (eₙ : n ≃ n') (eₒ : o ≃ o') (M : matrix m n A) (N : matrix n o A) :
reindex_linear_equiv R A eₘ eₒ (M ⬝ N) =
reindex_linear_equiv R A eₘ eₙ M ⬝ reindex_linear_equiv R A eₙ eₒ N :=
minor_mul_equiv M N _ _ _
lemma mul_reindex_linear_equiv_one [fintype n] [fintype o] [decidable_eq o] (e₁ : o ≃ n)
(e₂ : o ≃ n') (M : matrix m n A) : M.mul (reindex_linear_equiv R A e₁ e₂ 1) =
reindex_linear_equiv R A (equiv.refl m) (e₁.symm.trans e₂) M :=
mul_minor_one _ _ _
end semiring
section algebra
variables [comm_semiring R] [fintype n] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
/--
For square matrices with coefficients in commutative semirings, the natural map that reindexes
a matrix's rows and columns with equivalent types, `matrix.reindex`, is an equivalence of algebras.
-/
def reindex_alg_equiv (e : m ≃ n) : matrix m m R ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
{ to_fun := reindex e e,
map_mul' := reindex_linear_equiv_mul R R e e e,
commutes' := λ r, by simp [algebra_map, algebra.to_ring_hom, minor_smul],
..(reindex_linear_equiv R R e e) }
@[simp] lemma reindex_alg_equiv_apply (e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix m m R) :
reindex_alg_equiv R e M = reindex e e M :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_alg_equiv_symm (e : m ≃ n) :
(reindex_alg_equiv R e).symm = reindex_alg_equiv R e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_alg_equiv_refl : reindex_alg_equiv R (equiv.refl m) = alg_equiv.refl :=
alg_equiv.ext $ λ _, rfl
lemma reindex_alg_equiv_mul (e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix m m R) (N : matrix m m R) :
reindex_alg_equiv R e (M ⬝ N) = reindex_alg_equiv R e M ⬝ reindex_alg_equiv R e N :=
(reindex_alg_equiv R e).map_mul M N
end algebra
/-- Reindexing both indices along the same equivalence preserves the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `det_minor_equiv_self`.
-/
lemma det_reindex_linear_equiv_self [comm_ring R] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
[fintype n] [decidable_eq n] (e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix m m R) :
det (reindex_linear_equiv R R e e M) = det M :=
det_reindex_self e M
/-- Reindexing both indices along the same equivalence preserves the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `det_minor_equiv_self`.
-/
lemma det_reindex_alg_equiv [comm_ring R] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
(e : m ≃ n) (A : matrix m m R) :
det (reindex_alg_equiv R e A) = det A :=
det_reindex_self e A
end matrix
|
914f4ac7734b732dd4670ec77ed8dc4964e5ea8c | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/finset/preimage.lean | fa69ca229e1e6c4b61bb623e6bae640a311d0cf2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,514 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.set.finite
import algebra.big_operators.basic
/-!
# Preimage of a `finset` under an injective map.
-/
open set function
open_locale big_operators
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace finset
section preimage
/-- Preimage of `s : finset β` under a map `f` injective of `f ⁻¹' s` as a `finset`. -/
noncomputable def preimage (s : finset β) (f : α → β)
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) : finset α :=
(s.finite_to_set.preimage hf).to_finset
@[simp] lemma mem_preimage {f : α → β} {s : finset β} {hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)} {x : α} :
x ∈ preimage s f hf ↔ f x ∈ s :=
set.finite.mem_to_finset _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_preimage {f : α → β} (s : finset β)
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) : (↑(preimage s f hf) : set α) = f ⁻¹' ↑s :=
set.finite.coe_to_finset _
@[simp] lemma preimage_empty {f : α → β} : preimage ∅ f (by simp [inj_on]) = ∅ :=
finset.coe_injective (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_univ {f : α → β} [fintype α] [fintype β] (hf) :
preimage univ f hf = univ :=
finset.coe_injective (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_inter [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s t : finset β}
(hs : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) (ht : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑t)) :
preimage (s ∩ t) f (λ x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂, hs (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx₁) (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx₂))
= preimage s f hs ∩ preimage t f ht :=
finset.coe_injective (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_union [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s t : finset β} (hst) :
preimage (s ∪ t) f hst
= preimage s f (λ x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂, hst (mem_union_left _ hx₁) (mem_union_left _ hx₂))
∪ preimage t f (λ x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂, hst (mem_union_right _ hx₁) (mem_union_right _ hx₂)) :=
finset.coe_injective (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_compl [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] [fintype α] [fintype β]
{f : α → β} (s : finset β) (hf : function.injective f) :
preimage sᶜ f (hf.inj_on _) = (preimage s f (hf.inj_on _))ᶜ :=
finset.coe_injective (by simp)
lemma monotone_preimage {f : α → β} (h : injective f) :
monotone (λ s, preimage s f (h.inj_on _)) :=
λ s t hst x hx, mem_preimage.2 (hst $ mem_preimage.1 hx)
lemma image_subset_iff_subset_preimage [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑t)) :
s.image f ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t.preimage f hf :=
image_subset_iff.trans $ by simp only [subset_iff, mem_preimage]
lemma map_subset_iff_subset_preimage {f : α ↪ β} {s : finset α} {t : finset β} :
s.map f ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t.preimage f (f.injective.inj_on _) :=
by classical; rw [map_eq_image, image_subset_iff_subset_preimage]
lemma image_preimage [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (s : finset β) [Π x, decidable (x ∈ set.range f)]
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) :
image f (preimage s f hf) = s.filter (λ x, x ∈ set.range f) :=
finset.coe_inj.1 $ by simp only [coe_image, coe_preimage, coe_filter,
set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, set.sep_mem_eq]
lemma image_preimage_of_bij [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (s : finset β)
(hf : set.bij_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) :
image f (preimage s f hf.inj_on) = s :=
finset.coe_inj.1 $ by simpa using hf.image_eq
lemma sigma_preimage_mk {β : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] (s : finset (Σ a, β a)) (t : finset α) :
t.sigma (λ a, s.preimage (sigma.mk a) $ sigma_mk_injective.inj_on _) = s.filter (λ a, a.1 ∈ t) :=
by { ext x, simp [and_comm] }
lemma sigma_preimage_mk_of_subset {β : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] (s : finset (Σ a, β a))
{t : finset α} (ht : s.image sigma.fst ⊆ t) :
t.sigma (λ a, s.preimage (sigma.mk a) $ sigma_mk_injective.inj_on _) = s :=
by rw [sigma_preimage_mk, filter_true_of_mem $ image_subset_iff.1 ht]
lemma sigma_image_fst_preimage_mk {β : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] (s : finset (Σ a, β a)) :
(s.image sigma.fst).sigma (λ a, s.preimage (sigma.mk a) $ sigma_mk_injective.inj_on _) = s :=
s.sigma_preimage_mk_of_subset (subset.refl _)
end preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage' [comm_monoid β] (f : α → γ) [decidable_pred $ λ x, x ∈ set.range f]
(s : finset γ) (hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x in s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x in s.filter (λ x, x ∈ set.range f), g x :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq γ;
calc ∏ x in preimage s f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x in image f (preimage s f hf), g x :
eq.symm $ prod_image $ by simpa only [mem_preimage, inj_on] using hf
... = ∏ x in s.filter (λ x, x ∈ set.range f), g x : by rw [image_preimage]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage [comm_monoid β] (f : α → γ) (s : finset γ)
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) (g : γ → β) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∉ set.range f → g x = 1) :
∏ x in s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x in s, g x :=
by { classical, rw [prod_preimage', prod_filter_of_ne], exact λ x hx, not.imp_symm (hg x hx) }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage_of_bij [comm_monoid β] (f : α → γ) (s : finset γ)
(hf : set.bij_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x in s.preimage f hf.inj_on, g (f x) = ∏ x in s, g x :=
prod_preimage _ _ hf.inj_on g $ λ x hxs hxf, (hxf $ hf.subset_range hxs).elim
end finset
|
e5a7afbaf9d5530fee4c8c67240800ed1fc460aa | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/group_theory/congruence.lean | 649c3a7d74cac7743468b3cfcae570a2506e5769 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,349 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.setoid.basic
import Mathlib.algebra.group.pi
import Mathlib.algebra.group.prod
import Mathlib.data.equiv.mul_add
import Mathlib.group_theory.submonoid.operations
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 l u_3 u_2
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Congruence relations
This file defines congruence relations: equivalence relations that preserve a binary operation,
which in this case is multiplication or addition. The principal definition is a `structure`
extending a `setoid` (an equivalence relation), and the inductive definition of the smallest
congruence relation containing a binary relation is also given (see `con_gen`).
The file also proves basic properties of the quotient of a type by a congruence relation, and the
complete lattice of congruence relations on a type. We then establish an order-preserving bijection
between the set of congruence relations containing a congruence relation `c` and the set of
congruence relations on the quotient by `c`.
The second half of the file concerns congruence relations on monoids, in which case the
quotient by the congruence relation is also a monoid. There are results about the universal
property of quotients of monoids, and the isomorphism theorems for monoids.
## Implementation notes
The inductive definition of a congruence relation could be a nested inductive type, defined using
the equivalence closure of a binary relation `eqv_gen`, but the recursor generated does not work.
A nested inductive definition could conceivably shorten proofs, because they would allow invocation
of the corresponding lemmas about `eqv_gen`.
The lemmas `refl`, `symm` and `trans` are not tagged with `@[refl]`, `@[symm]`, and `@[trans]`
respectively as these tags do not work on a structure coerced to a binary relation.
There is a coercion from elements of a type to the element's equivalence class under a
congruence relation.
A congruence relation on a monoid `M` can be thought of as a submonoid of `M × M` for which
membership is an equivalence relation, but whilst this fact is established in the file, it is not
used, since this perspective adds more layers of definitional unfolding.
## Tags
congruence, congruence relation, quotient, quotient by congruence relation, monoid,
quotient monoid, isomorphism theorems
-/
/-- A congruence relation on a type with an addition is an equivalence relation which
preserves addition. -/
structure add_con (M : Type u_1) [Add M]
extends setoid M
where
add' : ∀ {w x y z : M}, r w x → r y z → r (w + y) (x + z)
/-- A congruence relation on a type with a multiplication is an equivalence relation which
preserves multiplication. -/
structure con (M : Type u_1) [Mul M]
extends setoid M
where
mul' : ∀ {w x y z : M}, r w x → r y z → r (w * y) (x * z)
/-- The equivalence relation underlying an additive congruence relation. -/
/-- The equivalence relation underlying a multiplicative congruence relation. -/
/-- The inductively defined smallest additive congruence relation containing a given binary
relation. -/
inductive add_con_gen.rel {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (r : M → M → Prop) : M → M → Prop
where
| of : ∀ (x y : M), r x y → add_con_gen.rel r x y
| refl : ∀ (x : M), add_con_gen.rel r x x
| symm : ∀ (x y : M), add_con_gen.rel r x y → add_con_gen.rel r y x
| trans : ∀ (x y z : M), add_con_gen.rel r x y → add_con_gen.rel r y z → add_con_gen.rel r x z
| add : ∀ (w x y z : M), add_con_gen.rel r w x → add_con_gen.rel r y z → add_con_gen.rel r (w + y) (x + z)
/-- The inductively defined smallest multiplicative congruence relation containing a given binary
relation. -/
inductive con_gen.rel {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (r : M → M → Prop) : M → M → Prop
where
| of : ∀ (x y : M), r x y → con_gen.rel r x y
| refl : ∀ (x : M), con_gen.rel r x x
| symm : ∀ (x y : M), con_gen.rel r x y → con_gen.rel r y x
| trans : ∀ (x y z : M), con_gen.rel r x y → con_gen.rel r y z → con_gen.rel r x z
| mul : ∀ (w x y z : M), con_gen.rel r w x → con_gen.rel r y z → con_gen.rel r (w * y) (x * z)
/-- The inductively defined smallest multiplicative congruence relation containing a given binary
relation. -/
def con_gen {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (r : M → M → Prop) : con M :=
con.mk sorry sorry sorry
namespace con
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.inhabited {M : Type u_1} [Add M] : Inhabited (add_con M) :=
{ default := add_con_gen empty_relation }
/-- A coercion from a congruence relation to its underlying binary relation. -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.has_coe_to_fun {M : Type u_1} [Add M] : has_coe_to_fun (add_con M) :=
has_coe_to_fun.mk (fun (c : add_con M) => M → M → Prop) fun (c : add_con M) (x y : M) => add_con.r c x y
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.rel_eq_coe {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) : add_con.r c = ⇑c :=
rfl
/-- Congruence relations are reflexive. -/
protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.refl {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) (x : M) : coe_fn c x x :=
and.left (add_con.iseqv c) x
/-- Congruence relations are symmetric. -/
protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.symm {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) {x : M} {y : M} : coe_fn c x y → coe_fn c y x :=
fun (h : coe_fn c _x✝ _x) => and.left (and.right (add_con.iseqv c)) _x✝ _x h
/-- Congruence relations are transitive. -/
protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.trans {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) {x : M} {y : M} {z : M} : coe_fn c x y → coe_fn c y z → coe_fn c x z :=
fun (h : coe_fn c _x✝¹ _x✝) => and.right (and.right (add_con.iseqv c)) _x✝¹ _x✝ _x h
/-- Multiplicative congruence relations preserve multiplication. -/
protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.add {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) {w : M} {x : M} {y : M} {z : M} : coe_fn c w x → coe_fn c y z → coe_fn c (w + y) (x + z) :=
fun (h1 : coe_fn c _x✝² _x✝¹) (h2 : coe_fn c _x✝ _x) => add_con.add' c h1 h2
/-- Given a type `M` with a multiplication, a congruence relation `c` on `M`, and elements of `M`
`x, y`, `(x, y) ∈ M × M` iff `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.has_mem {M : Type u_1} [Add M] : has_mem (M × M) (add_con M) :=
has_mem.mk fun (x : M × M) (c : add_con M) => coe_fn c (prod.fst x) (prod.snd x)
/-- The map sending a congruence relation to its underlying binary relation is injective. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.ext' {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} (H : add_con.r c = add_con.r d) : c = d := sorry
/-- Extensionality rule for congruence relations. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.ext {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} (H : ∀ (x y : M), coe_fn c x y ↔ coe_fn d x y) : c = d :=
add_con.ext' (funext fun (x : M) => funext fun (x_1 : M) => propext (H x x_1))
/-- The map sending a congruence relation to its underlying equivalence relation is injective. -/
theorem to_setoid_inj {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] {c : con M} {d : con M} (H : to_setoid c = to_setoid d) : c = d :=
ext (iff.mp setoid.ext_iff H)
/-- Iff version of extensionality rule for congruence relations. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.ext_iff {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} : (∀ (x y : M), coe_fn c x y ↔ coe_fn d x y) ↔ c = d :=
{ mp := add_con.ext, mpr := fun (h : c = d) (_x _x_1 : M) => h ▸ iff.rfl }
/-- Two congruence relations are equal iff their underlying binary relations are equal. -/
theorem ext'_iff {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] {c : con M} {d : con M} : r c = r d ↔ c = d :=
{ mp := ext', mpr := fun (h : c = d) => h ▸ rfl }
/-- The kernel of a multiplication-preserving function as a congruence relation. -/
def mul_ker {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [Mul M] [Mul P] (f : M → P) (h : ∀ (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y) : con M :=
mk (fun (x y : M) => f x = f y) sorry sorry
/-- Given types with multiplications `M, N`, the product of two congruence relations `c` on `M` and
`d` on `N`: `(x₁, x₂), (y₁, y₂) ∈ M × N` are related by `c.prod d` iff `x₁` is related to `y₁`
by `c` and `x₂` is related to `y₂` by `d`. -/
protected def Mathlib.add_con.prod {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [Add M] [Add N] (c : add_con M) (d : add_con N) : add_con (M × N) :=
add_con.mk setoid.r sorry sorry
/-- The product of an indexed collection of congruence relations. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.pi {ι : Type u_1} {f : ι → Type u_2} [(i : ι) → Add (f i)] (C : (i : ι) → add_con (f i)) : add_con ((i : ι) → f i) :=
add_con.mk setoid.r sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.coe_eq {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) : setoid.r = ⇑c :=
rfl
-- Quotients
/-- Defining the quotient by a congruence relation of a type with a multiplication. -/
protected def Mathlib.add_con.quotient {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) :=
quotient (add_con.to_setoid c)
/-- Coercion from a type with a multiplication to its quotient by a congruence relation.
See Note [use has_coe_t]. -/
protected instance quotient.has_coe_t {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (c : con M) : has_coe_t M (con.quotient c) :=
has_coe_t.mk quotient.mk
/-- The quotient of a type with decidable equality by a congruence relation also has
decidable equality. -/
protected instance quotient.decidable_eq {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (c : con M) [d : (a b : M) → Decidable (coe_fn c a b)] : DecidableEq (con.quotient c) :=
quotient.decidable_eq
/-- The function on the quotient by a congruence relation `c` induced by a function that is
constant on `c`'s equivalence classes. -/
protected def Mathlib.add_con.lift_on {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {β : Sort u_2} {c : add_con M} (q : add_con.quotient c) (f : M → β) (h : ∀ (a b : M), coe_fn c a b → f a = f b) : β :=
quotient.lift_on' q f h
/-- The binary function on the quotient by a congruence relation `c` induced by a binary function
that is constant on `c`'s equivalence classes. -/
protected def Mathlib.add_con.lift_on₂ {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {β : Sort u_2} {c : add_con M} (q : add_con.quotient c) (r : add_con.quotient c) (f : M → M → β) (h : ∀ (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : M), coe_fn c a₁ b₁ → coe_fn c a₂ b₂ → f a₁ a₂ = f b₁ b₂) : β :=
quotient.lift_on₂' q r f h
/-- The inductive principle used to prove propositions about the elements of a quotient by a
congruence relation. -/
protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.induction_on {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {C : add_con.quotient c → Prop} (q : add_con.quotient c) (H : ∀ (x : M), C ↑x) : C q :=
quotient.induction_on' q H
/-- A version of `con.induction_on` for predicates which take two arguments. -/
protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.induction_on₂ {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [Add M] [Add N] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con N} {C : add_con.quotient c → add_con.quotient d → Prop} (p : add_con.quotient c) (q : add_con.quotient d) (H : ∀ (x : M) (y : N), C ↑x ↑y) : C p q :=
quotient.induction_on₂' p q H
/-- Two elements are related by a congruence relation `c` iff they are represented by the same
element of the quotient by `c`. -/
@[simp] protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.eq {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) {a : M} {b : M} : ↑a = ↑b ↔ coe_fn c a b :=
quotient.eq'
/-- The multiplication induced on the quotient by a congruence relation on a type with a
multiplication. -/
protected instance has_mul {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (c : con M) : Mul (con.quotient c) :=
{ mul := fun (x y : con.quotient c) => quotient.lift_on₂' x y (fun (w z : M) => ↑(w * z)) sorry }
/-- The kernel of the quotient map induced by a congruence relation `c` equals `c`. -/
@[simp] theorem mul_ker_mk_eq {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (c : con M) : (mul_ker coe fun (x y : M) => rfl) = c :=
ext fun (x y : M) => quotient.eq'
/-- The coercion to the quotient of a congruence relation commutes with multiplication (by
definition). -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.coe_add {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} (x : M) (y : M) : ↑(x + y) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
/-- Definition of the function on the quotient by a congruence relation `c` induced by a function
that is constant on `c`'s equivalence classes. -/
@[simp] protected theorem lift_on_beta {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] {β : Sort u_2} (c : con M) (f : M → β) (h : ∀ (a b : M), coe_fn c a b → f a = f b) (x : M) : con.lift_on (↑x) f h = f x :=
rfl
/-- Makes an isomorphism of quotients by two congruence relations, given that the relations are
equal. -/
protected def Mathlib.add_con.congr {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} (h : c = d) : add_con.quotient c ≃+ add_con.quotient d :=
add_equiv.mk (equiv.to_fun (quotient.congr (equiv.refl M) sorry)) (equiv.inv_fun (quotient.congr (equiv.refl M) sorry))
sorry sorry sorry
-- The complete lattice of congruence relations on a type
/-- For congruence relations `c, d` on a type `M` with a multiplication, `c ≤ d` iff `∀ x y ∈ M`,
`x` is related to `y` by `d` if `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.has_le {M : Type u_1} [Add M] : HasLessEq (add_con M) :=
{ LessEq := fun (c d : add_con M) => ∀ {x y : M}, coe_fn c x y → coe_fn d x y }
/-- Definition of `≤` for congruence relations. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.le_def {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} : c ≤ d ↔ ∀ {x y : M}, coe_fn c x y → coe_fn d x y :=
iff.rfl
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations on a given type with a multiplication. -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.has_Inf {M : Type u_1} [Add M] : has_Inf (add_con M) :=
has_Inf.mk
fun (S : set (add_con M)) => add_con.mk (fun (x y : M) => ∀ (c : add_con M), c ∈ S → coe_fn c x y) sorry sorry
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying equivalence relation. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.Inf_to_setoid {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (S : set (add_con M)) : add_con.to_setoid (Inf S) = Inf (add_con.to_setoid '' S) := sorry
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying binary relation. -/
theorem Inf_def {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (S : set (con M)) : r (Inf S) = Inf (r '' S) := sorry
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.partial_order {M : Type u_1} [Add M] : partial_order (add_con M) :=
partial_order.mk LessEq (fun (c d : add_con M) => c ≤ d ∧ ¬d ≤ c) sorry sorry sorry
/-- The complete lattice of congruence relations on a given type with a multiplication. -/
protected instance complete_lattice {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] : complete_lattice (con M) :=
complete_lattice.mk complete_lattice.sup complete_lattice.le complete_lattice.lt sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
(fun (c d : con M) => mk setoid.r sorry sorry) sorry sorry sorry (mk setoid.r sorry sorry) sorry
(mk setoid.r sorry sorry) sorry complete_lattice.Sup complete_lattice.Inf sorry sorry sorry sorry
/-- The infimum of two congruence relations equals the infimum of the underlying binary
operations. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.inf_def {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} : add_con.r (c ⊓ d) = add_con.r c ⊓ add_con.r d :=
rfl
/-- Definition of the infimum of two congruence relations. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.inf_iff_and {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} {x : M} {y : M} : coe_fn (c ⊓ d) x y ↔ coe_fn c x y ∧ coe_fn d x y :=
iff.rfl
/-- The inductively defined smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` equals
the infimum of the set of congruence relations containing `r`. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.add_con_gen_eq {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (r : M → M → Prop) : add_con_gen r = Inf (set_of fun (s : add_con M) => ∀ (x y : M), r x y → coe_fn s x y) := sorry
/-- The smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` is contained in any
congruence relation containing `r`. -/
theorem con_gen_le {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] {r : M → M → Prop} {c : con M} (h : ∀ (x y : M), r x y → r c x y) : con_gen r ≤ c :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (con_gen r ≤ c)) (con_gen_eq r))) (Inf_le h)
/-- Given binary relations `r, s` with `r` contained in `s`, the smallest congruence relation
containing `s` contains the smallest congruence relation containing `r`. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.add_con_gen_mono {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {r : M → M → Prop} {s : M → M → Prop} (h : ∀ (x y : M), r x y → s x y) : add_con_gen r ≤ add_con_gen s :=
add_con.add_con_gen_le fun (x y : M) (hr : r x y) => add_con_gen.rel.of x y (h x y hr)
/-- Congruence relations equal the smallest congruence relation in which they are contained. -/
@[simp] theorem con_gen_of_con {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (c : con M) : con_gen ⇑c = c :=
le_antisymm (eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (con_gen ⇑c ≤ c)) (con_gen_eq ⇑c))) (Inf_le fun (_x _x_1 : M) => id))
con_gen.rel.of
/-- The map sending a binary relation to the smallest congruence relation in which it is
contained is idempotent. -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.add_con_gen_idem {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (r : M → M → Prop) : add_con_gen ⇑(add_con_gen r) = add_con_gen r :=
add_con.add_con_gen_of_add_con (add_con_gen r)
/-- The supremum of congruence relations `c, d` equals the smallest congruence relation containing
the binary relation '`x` is related to `y` by `c` or `d`'. -/
theorem sup_eq_con_gen {M : Type u_1} [Mul M] (c : con M) (d : con M) : c ⊔ d = con_gen fun (x y : M) => coe_fn c x y ∨ coe_fn d x y := sorry
/-- The supremum of two congruence relations equals the smallest congruence relation containing
the supremum of the underlying binary operations. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.sup_def {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} : c ⊔ d = add_con_gen (add_con.r c ⊔ add_con.r d) :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (c ⊔ d = add_con_gen (add_con.r c ⊔ add_con.r d))) (add_con.sup_eq_add_con_gen c d)))
(Eq.refl (add_con_gen fun (x y : M) => coe_fn c x y ∨ coe_fn d x y))
/-- The supremum of a set of congruence relations `S` equals the smallest congruence relation
containing the binary relation 'there exists `c ∈ S` such that `x` is related to `y` by
`c`'. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.Sup_eq_add_con_gen {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (S : set (add_con M)) : Sup S = add_con_gen fun (x y : M) => ∃ (c : add_con M), c ∈ S ∧ coe_fn c x y := sorry
/-- The supremum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the smallest congruence relation
containing the supremum of the set's image under the map to the underlying binary relation. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.Sup_def {M : Type u_1} [Add M] {S : set (add_con M)} : Sup S = add_con_gen (Sup (add_con.r '' S)) := sorry
/-- There is a Galois insertion of congruence relations on a type with a multiplication `M` into
binary relations on `M`. -/
protected def gi (M : Type u_1) [Mul M] : galois_insertion con_gen r :=
galois_insertion.mk (fun (r : M → M → Prop) (h : r (con_gen r) ≤ r) => con_gen r) sorry sorry sorry
/-- Given a function `f`, the smallest congruence relation containing the binary relation on `f`'s
image defined by '`x ≈ y` iff the elements of `f⁻¹(x)` are related to the elements of `f⁻¹(y)`
by a congruence relation `c`.' -/
def Mathlib.add_con.map_gen {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [Add M] [Add N] (c : add_con M) (f : M → N) : add_con N :=
add_con_gen fun (x y : N) => ∃ (a : M), ∃ (b : M), f a = x ∧ f b = y ∧ coe_fn c a b
/-- Given a surjective multiplicative-preserving function `f` whose kernel is contained in a
congruence relation `c`, the congruence relation on `f`'s codomain defined by '`x ≈ y` iff the
elements of `f⁻¹(x)` are related to the elements of `f⁻¹(y)` by `c`.' -/
def Mathlib.add_con.map_of_surjective {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [Add M] [Add N] (c : add_con M) (f : M → N) (H : ∀ (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y) (h : add_con.add_ker f H ≤ c) (hf : function.surjective f) : add_con N :=
add_con.mk setoid.r sorry sorry
/-- A specialization of 'the smallest congruence relation containing a congruence relation `c`
equals `c`'. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.map_of_surjective_eq_map_gen {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [Add M] [Add N] {c : add_con M} {f : M → N} (H : ∀ (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y) (h : add_con.add_ker f H ≤ c) (hf : function.surjective f) : add_con.map_gen c f = add_con.map_of_surjective c f H h hf := sorry
/-- Given types with multiplications `M, N` and a congruence relation `c` on `N`, a
multiplication-preserving map `f : M → N` induces a congruence relation on `f`'s domain
defined by '`x ≈ y` iff `f(x)` is related to `f(y)` by `c`.' -/
def Mathlib.add_con.comap {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [Add M] [Add N] (f : M → N) (H : ∀ (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y) (c : add_con N) : add_con M :=
add_con.mk setoid.r sorry sorry
/-- Given a congruence relation `c` on a type `M` with a multiplication, the order-preserving
bijection between the set of congruence relations containing `c` and the congruence relations
on the quotient of `M` by `c`. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.correspondence {M : Type u_1} [Add M] (c : add_con M) : (Subtype fun (d : add_con M) => c ≤ d) ≃o add_con (add_con.quotient c) :=
rel_iso.mk
(equiv.mk
(fun (d : Subtype fun (d : add_con M) => c ≤ d) => add_con.map_of_surjective (subtype.val d) coe sorry sorry sorry)
(fun (d : add_con (add_con.quotient c)) => { val := add_con.comap coe sorry d, property := sorry }) sorry sorry)
sorry
-- Monoids
/-- The quotient of a monoid by a congruence relation is a monoid. -/
protected instance monoid {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] (c : con M) : monoid (con.quotient c) :=
monoid.mk Mul.mul sorry ↑1 sorry sorry
/-- The quotient of a `comm_monoid` by a congruence relation is a `comm_monoid`. -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.add_comm_monoid {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (c : add_con α) : add_comm_monoid (add_con.quotient c) :=
add_comm_monoid.mk add_monoid.add sorry add_monoid.zero sorry sorry sorry
/-- The 1 of the quotient of a monoid by a congruence relation is the equivalence class of the
monoid's 1. -/
@[simp] theorem coe_one {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] {c : con M} : ↑1 = 1 :=
rfl
/-- The submonoid of `M × M` defined by a congruence relation on a monoid `M`. -/
protected def Mathlib.add_con.add_submonoid (M : Type u_1) [add_monoid M] (c : add_con M) : add_submonoid (M × M) :=
add_submonoid.mk (set_of fun (x : M × M) => coe_fn c (prod.fst x) (prod.snd x)) sorry sorry
/-- The congruence relation on a monoid `M` from a submonoid of `M × M` for which membership
is an equivalence relation. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.of_add_submonoid {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] (N : add_submonoid (M × M)) (H : equivalence fun (x y : M) => (x, y) ∈ N) : add_con M :=
add_con.mk (fun (x y : M) => (x, y) ∈ N) H sorry
/-- Coercion from a congruence relation `c` on a monoid `M` to the submonoid of `M × M` whose
elements are `(x, y)` such that `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
protected instance to_submonoid {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] : has_coe (con M) (submonoid (M × M)) :=
has_coe.mk fun (c : con M) => con.submonoid M c
theorem Mathlib.add_con.mem_coe {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] {c : add_con M} {x : M} {y : M} : (x, y) ∈ ↑c ↔ (x, y) ∈ c :=
iff.rfl
theorem to_submonoid_inj {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] (c : con M) (d : con M) (H : ↑c = ↑d) : c = d := sorry
theorem Mathlib.add_con.le_iff {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} : c ≤ d ↔ ↑c ≤ ↑d :=
{ mp := fun (h : c ≤ d) (x : M × M) (H : x ∈ ↑c) => h H,
mpr := fun (h : ↑c ≤ ↑d) (x y : M) (hc : coe_fn c x y) => h ((fun (this : (x, y) ∈ c) => this) hc) }
/-- The kernel of a monoid homomorphism as a congruence relation. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.ker {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] (f : M →+ P) : add_con M :=
add_con.add_ker (⇑f) (add_monoid_hom.map_add' f)
/-- The definition of the congruence relation defined by a monoid homomorphism's kernel. -/
theorem ker_rel {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [monoid M] [monoid P] (f : M →* P) {x : M} {y : M} : coe_fn (ker f) x y ↔ coe_fn f x = coe_fn f y :=
iff.rfl
/-- There exists an element of the quotient of a monoid by a congruence relation (namely 1). -/
protected instance quotient.inhabited {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] {c : con M} : Inhabited (con.quotient c) :=
{ default := ↑1 }
/-- The natural homomorphism from a monoid to its quotient by a congruence relation. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.mk' {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] (c : add_con M) : M →+ add_con.quotient c :=
add_monoid_hom.mk coe sorry sorry
/-- The kernel of the natural homomorphism from a monoid to its quotient by a congruence
relation `c` equals `c`. -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.mk'_ker {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] (c : add_con M) : add_con.ker (add_con.mk' c) = c :=
add_con.ext fun (_x _x_1 : M) => add_con.eq c
/-- The natural homomorphism from a monoid to its quotient by a congruence relation is
surjective. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.mk'_surjective {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] {c : add_con M} : function.surjective ⇑(add_con.mk' c) :=
fun (x : add_con.quotient c) => quot.induction_on x fun (x : M) => Exists.intro x rfl
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.comp_mk'_apply {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} (g : add_con.quotient c →+ P) {x : M} : coe_fn (add_monoid_hom.comp g (add_con.mk' c)) x = coe_fn g ↑x :=
rfl
/-- The elements related to `x ∈ M`, `M` a monoid, by the kernel of a monoid homomorphism are
those in the preimage of `f(x)` under `f`. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.ker_apply_eq_preimage {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {f : M →+ P} (x : M) : coe_fn (add_con.ker f) x = ⇑f ⁻¹' singleton (coe_fn f x) := sorry
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : N → M` and a congruence relation `c` on `M`, the congruence
relation induced on `N` by `f` equals the kernel of `c`'s quotient homomorphism composed with
`f`. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.comap_eq {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid N] {c : add_con M} {f : N →+ M} : add_con.comap (⇑f) (add_monoid_hom.map_add f) c = add_con.ker (add_monoid_hom.comp (add_con.mk' c) f) := sorry
/-- The homomorphism on the quotient of a monoid by a congruence relation `c` induced by a
homomorphism constant on `c`'s equivalence classes. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.lift {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] (c : add_con M) (f : M →+ P) (H : c ≤ add_con.ker f) : add_con.quotient c →+ P :=
add_monoid_hom.mk (fun (x : add_con.quotient c) => add_con.lift_on x ⇑f sorry) sorry sorry
/-- The diagram describing the universal property for quotients of monoids commutes. -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_mk' {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} {f : M →+ P} (H : c ≤ add_con.ker f) (x : M) : coe_fn (add_con.lift c f H) (coe_fn (add_con.mk' c) x) = coe_fn f x :=
rfl
/-- The diagram describing the universal property for quotients of monoids commutes. -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_coe {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} {f : M →+ P} (H : c ≤ add_con.ker f) (x : M) : coe_fn (add_con.lift c f H) ↑x = coe_fn f x :=
rfl
/-- The diagram describing the universal property for quotients of monoids commutes. -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_comp_mk' {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} {f : M →+ P} (H : c ≤ add_con.ker f) : add_monoid_hom.comp (add_con.lift c f H) (add_con.mk' c) = f :=
add_monoid_hom.ext fun (x : M) => Eq.refl (coe_fn (add_monoid_hom.comp (add_con.lift c f H) (add_con.mk' c)) x)
/-- Given a homomorphism `f` from the quotient of a monoid by a congruence relation, `f` equals the
homomorphism on the quotient induced by `f` composed with the natural map from the monoid to
the quotient. -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_apply_mk' {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} (f : add_con.quotient c →+ P) : (add_con.lift c (add_monoid_hom.comp f (add_con.mk' c))
fun (x y : M) (h : coe_fn c x y) =>
(fun (this : coe_fn f ↑x = coe_fn f ↑y) => this)
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (coe_fn f ↑x = coe_fn f ↑y)) (iff.mpr (add_con.eq c) h)))
(Eq.refl (coe_fn f ↑y)))) =
f := sorry
/-- Homomorphisms on the quotient of a monoid by a congruence relation are equal if they
are equal on elements that are coercions from the monoid. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_funext {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} (f : add_con.quotient c →+ P) (g : add_con.quotient c →+ P) (h : ∀ (a : M), coe_fn f ↑a = coe_fn g ↑a) : f = g := sorry
/-- The uniqueness part of the universal property for quotients of monoids. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_unique {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} {f : M →+ P} (H : c ≤ add_con.ker f) (g : add_con.quotient c →+ P) (Hg : add_monoid_hom.comp g (add_con.mk' c) = f) : g = add_con.lift c f H := sorry
/-- Given a congruence relation `c` on a monoid and a homomorphism `f` constant on `c`'s
equivalence classes, `f` has the same image as the homomorphism that `f` induces on the
quotient. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_range {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} {f : M →+ P} (H : c ≤ add_con.ker f) : add_monoid_hom.mrange (add_con.lift c f H) = add_monoid_hom.mrange f := sorry
/-- Surjective monoid homomorphisms constant on a congruence relation `c`'s equivalence classes
induce a surjective homomorphism on `c`'s quotient. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.lift_surjective_of_surjective {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {c : add_con M} {f : M →+ P} (h : c ≤ add_con.ker f) (hf : function.surjective ⇑f) : function.surjective ⇑(add_con.lift c f h) :=
fun (y : P) =>
exists.elim (hf y) fun (w : M) (hw : coe_fn f w = y) => Exists.intro (↑w) (Eq.symm (add_con.lift_mk' h w) ▸ hw)
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f` from `M` to `P`, the kernel of `f` is the unique congruence
relation on `M` whose induced map from the quotient of `M` to `P` is injective. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.ker_eq_lift_of_injective {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] (c : add_con M) (f : M →+ P) (H : c ≤ add_con.ker f) (h : function.injective ⇑(add_con.lift c f H)) : add_con.ker f = c :=
add_con.to_setoid_inj (setoid.ker_eq_lift_of_injective (⇑f) H h)
/-- The homomorphism induced on the quotient of a monoid by the kernel of a monoid homomorphism. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.ker_lift {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] (f : M →+ P) : add_con.quotient (add_con.ker f) →+ P :=
add_con.lift (add_con.ker f) f sorry
/-- The diagram described by the universal property for quotients of monoids, when the congruence
relation is the kernel of the homomorphism, commutes. -/
@[simp] theorem ker_lift_mk {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [monoid M] [monoid P] {f : M →* P} (x : M) : coe_fn (ker_lift f) ↑x = coe_fn f x :=
rfl
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f`, the induced homomorphism on the quotient by `f`'s kernel has
the same image as `f`. -/
@[simp] theorem Mathlib.add_con.ker_lift_range_eq {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] {f : M →+ P} : add_monoid_hom.mrange (add_con.ker_lift f) = add_monoid_hom.mrange f :=
add_con.lift_range fun (_x _x_1 : M) => id
/-- A monoid homomorphism `f` induces an injective homomorphism on the quotient by `f`'s kernel. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.ker_lift_injective {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] (f : M →+ P) : function.injective ⇑(add_con.ker_lift f) :=
fun (x y : add_con.quotient (add_con.ker f)) =>
quotient.induction_on₂' x y fun (_x _x_1 : M) => iff.mpr (add_con.eq (add_con.ker f))
/-- Given congruence relations `c, d` on a monoid such that `d` contains `c`, `d`'s quotient
map induces a homomorphism from the quotient by `c` to the quotient by `d`. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.map {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] (c : add_con M) (d : add_con M) (h : c ≤ d) : add_con.quotient c →+ add_con.quotient d :=
add_con.lift c (add_con.mk' d) sorry
/-- Given congruence relations `c, d` on a monoid such that `d` contains `c`, the definition of
the homomorphism from the quotient by `c` to the quotient by `d` induced by `d`'s quotient
map. -/
theorem Mathlib.add_con.map_apply {M : Type u_1} [add_monoid M] {c : add_con M} {d : add_con M} (h : c ≤ d) (x : add_con.quotient c) : coe_fn (add_con.map c d h) x =
coe_fn (add_con.lift c (add_con.mk' d) fun (x y : M) (hc : coe_fn c x y) => iff.mpr (add_con.eq d) (h hc)) x :=
rfl
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for monoids. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.quotient_ker_equiv_range {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] (f : M →+ P) : add_con.quotient (add_con.ker f) ≃+ ↥(add_monoid_hom.mrange f) :=
add_equiv.mk
(equiv.to_fun
(equiv.of_bijective
⇑(add_monoid_hom.comp (add_equiv.to_add_monoid_hom (add_equiv.add_submonoid_congr add_con.ker_lift_range_eq))
(add_monoid_hom.mrange_restrict (add_con.ker_lift f)))
sorry))
(equiv.inv_fun
(equiv.of_bijective
⇑(add_monoid_hom.comp (add_equiv.to_add_monoid_hom (add_equiv.add_submonoid_congr add_con.ker_lift_range_eq))
(add_monoid_hom.mrange_restrict (add_con.ker_lift f)))
sorry))
sorry sorry sorry
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for monoids in the case of a surjective homomorphism. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective {M : Type u_1} {P : Type u_3} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid P] (f : M →+ P) (hf : function.surjective ⇑f) : add_con.quotient (add_con.ker f) ≃+ P :=
add_equiv.mk (equiv.to_fun (equiv.of_bijective ⇑(add_con.ker_lift f) sorry))
(equiv.inv_fun (equiv.of_bijective ⇑(add_con.ker_lift f) sorry)) sorry sorry sorry
/-- The second isomorphism theorem for monoids. -/
def Mathlib.add_con.comap_quotient_equiv {M : Type u_1} {N : Type u_2} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid N] (c : add_con M) (f : N →+ M) : add_con.quotient (add_con.comap (⇑f) (add_monoid_hom.map_add f) c) ≃+
↥(add_monoid_hom.mrange (add_monoid_hom.comp (add_con.mk' c) f)) :=
add_equiv.trans (add_con.congr add_con.comap_eq)
(add_con.quotient_ker_equiv_range (add_monoid_hom.comp (add_con.mk' c) f))
/-- The third isomorphism theorem for monoids. -/
def quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] (c : con M) (d : con M) (h : c ≤ d) : con.quotient (ker (map c d h)) ≃* con.quotient d :=
mul_equiv.mk (equiv.to_fun (setoid.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient (to_setoid c) (to_setoid d) h))
(equiv.inv_fun (setoid.quotient_quotient_equiv_quotient (to_setoid c) (to_setoid d) h)) sorry sorry sorry
/-- Multiplicative congruence relations preserve inversion. -/
protected theorem Mathlib.add_con.neg {M : Type u_1} [add_group M] (c : add_con M) {w : M} {x : M} : coe_fn c w x → coe_fn c (-w) (-x) := sorry
/-- The inversion induced on the quotient by a congruence relation on a type with a
inversion. -/
protected instance has_inv {M : Type u_1} [group M] (c : con M) : has_inv (con.quotient c) :=
has_inv.mk fun (x : con.quotient c) => quotient.lift_on' x (fun (w : M) => ↑(w⁻¹)) sorry
/-- The quotient of a group by a congruence relation is a group. -/
protected instance Mathlib.add_con.add_group {M : Type u_1} [add_group M] (c : add_con M) : add_group (add_con.quotient c) :=
add_group.mk add_monoid.add sorry add_monoid.zero sorry sorry (fun (x : add_con.quotient c) => -x)
(sub_neg_monoid.sub._default add_monoid.add sorry add_monoid.zero sorry sorry fun (x : add_con.quotient c) => -x)
sorry
|
e70dec4cf0e7919ac2d32fcaa91f11f8ed550fe1 | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/algebra/algebra/subalgebra.lean | d6add8937eaa2c4467a4ed295ecbb62a5bb62fe2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,581 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.algebra.basic
/-!
# Subalgebras over Commutative Semiring
In this file we define `subalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
More lemmas about `adjoin` can be found in `ring_theory.adjoin`.
-/
universes u v w
open_locale tensor_product big_operators
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that includes the range of `algebra_map`. -/
structure subalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v)
[comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] extends subsemiring A : Type v :=
(algebra_map_mem' : ∀ r, algebra_map R A r ∈ carrier)
/-- Reinterpret a `subalgebra` as a `subsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc subalgebra.to_subsemiring
namespace subalgebra
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [semiring B] [algebra R B]
include R
instance : has_coe (subalgebra R A) (subsemiring A) :=
⟨λ S, { ..S }⟩
instance : has_mem A (subalgebra R A) :=
⟨λ x S, x ∈ (S : set A)⟩
variables {A}
theorem mem_coe {x : A} {s : subalgebra R A} : x ∈ (s : set A) ↔ x ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
@[ext] theorem ext {S T : subalgebra R A}
(h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
by cases S; cases T; congr; ext x; exact h x
theorem ext_iff {S T : subalgebra R A} : S = T ↔ ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, ext⟩
variables (S : subalgebra R A)
theorem algebra_map_mem (r : R) : algebra_map R A r ∈ S :=
S.algebra_map_mem' r
theorem srange_le : (algebra_map R A).srange ≤ S :=
λ x ⟨r, _, hr⟩, hr ▸ S.algebra_map_mem r
theorem range_subset : set.range (algebra_map R A) ⊆ S :=
λ x ⟨r, hr⟩, hr ▸ S.algebra_map_mem r
theorem range_le : set.range (algebra_map R A) ≤ S :=
S.range_subset
theorem one_mem : (1 : A) ∈ S :=
subsemiring.one_mem S
theorem mul_mem {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) : x * y ∈ S :=
subsemiring.mul_mem S hx hy
theorem smul_mem {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (r : R) : r • x ∈ S :=
(algebra.smul_def r x).symm ▸ S.mul_mem (S.algebra_map_mem r) hx
theorem pow_mem {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ S :=
subsemiring.pow_mem S hx n
theorem zero_mem : (0 : A) ∈ S :=
subsemiring.zero_mem S
theorem add_mem {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) : x + y ∈ S :=
subsemiring.add_mem S hx hy
theorem neg_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) : -x ∈ S :=
neg_one_smul R x ▸ S.smul_mem hx _
theorem sub_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) : x - y ∈ S :=
S.add_mem hx $ S.neg_mem hy
theorem nsmul_mem {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : n •ℕ x ∈ S :=
subsemiring.nsmul_mem S hx n
theorem gsmul_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ x ∈ S :=
int.cases_on n (λ i, S.nsmul_mem hx i) (λ i, S.neg_mem $ S.nsmul_mem hx _)
theorem coe_nat_mem (n : ℕ) : (n : A) ∈ S :=
subsemiring.coe_nat_mem S n
theorem coe_int_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) (n : ℤ) : (n : A) ∈ S :=
int.cases_on n (λ i, S.coe_nat_mem i) (λ i, S.neg_mem $ S.coe_nat_mem $ i + 1)
theorem list_prod_mem {L : list A} (h : ∀ x ∈ L, x ∈ S) : L.prod ∈ S :=
subsemiring.list_prod_mem S h
theorem list_sum_mem {L : list A} (h : ∀ x ∈ L, x ∈ S) : L.sum ∈ S :=
subsemiring.list_sum_mem S h
theorem multiset_prod_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) {m : multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ m, x ∈ S) : m.prod ∈ S :=
subsemiring.multiset_prod_mem S m h
theorem multiset_sum_mem {m : multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ m, x ∈ S) : m.sum ∈ S :=
subsemiring.multiset_sum_mem S m h
theorem prod_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) {ι : Type w} {t : finset ι} {f : ι → A}
(h : ∀ x ∈ t, f x ∈ S) : ∏ x in t, f x ∈ S :=
subsemiring.prod_mem S h
theorem sum_mem {ι : Type w} {t : finset ι} {f : ι → A}
(h : ∀ x ∈ t, f x ∈ S) : ∑ x in t, f x ∈ S :=
subsemiring.sum_mem S h
instance {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(S : subalgebra R A) : is_add_submonoid (S : set A) :=
{ zero_mem := S.zero_mem,
add_mem := λ _ _, S.add_mem }
instance {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(S : subalgebra R A) : is_submonoid (S : set A) :=
{ one_mem := S.one_mem,
mul_mem := λ _ _, S.mul_mem }
/-- A subalgebra over a ring is also a `subring`. -/
def to_subring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) :
subring A :=
{ neg_mem' := λ _, S.neg_mem,
.. S.to_subsemiring }
instance {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) :
is_subring (S : set A) :=
{ neg_mem := λ _, S.neg_mem }
instance : inhabited S := ⟨0⟩
instance (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [semiring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) : semiring S := subsemiring.to_semiring S
instance (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) : comm_semiring S := subsemiring.to_comm_semiring S
instance (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_ring R] [ring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) : ring S := @@subtype.ring _ S.is_subring
instance (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A]
[algebra R A] (S : subalgebra R A) : comm_ring S := @@subtype.comm_ring _ S.is_subring
instance algebra : algebra R S :=
{ smul := λ (c:R) x, ⟨c • x.1, S.smul_mem x.2 c⟩,
commutes' := λ c x, subtype.eq $ algebra.commutes _ _,
smul_def' := λ c x, subtype.eq $ algebra.smul_def _ _,
.. (algebra_map R A).cod_srestrict S $ λ x, S.range_le ⟨x, rfl⟩ }
instance to_algebra {R A B : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra A B] (A₀ : subalgebra R A) : algebra A₀ B :=
algebra.of_subsemiring A₀
instance nontrivial [nontrivial A] : nontrivial S :=
subsemiring.nontrivial S
-- todo: standardize on the names these morphisms
-- compare with submodule.subtype
/-- Embedding of a subalgebra into the algebra. -/
def val : S →ₐ[R] A :=
by refine_struct { to_fun := (coe : S → A) }; intros; refl
@[simp] lemma coe_val : (S.val : S → A) = coe := rfl
lemma val_apply (x : S) : S.val x = (x : A) := rfl
/-- Convert a `subalgebra` to `submodule` -/
def to_submodule : submodule R A :=
{ carrier := S,
zero_mem' := (0:S).2,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy, (⟨x, hx⟩ + ⟨y, hy⟩ : S).2,
smul_mem' := λ c x hx, (algebra.smul_def c x).symm ▸
(⟨algebra_map R A c, S.range_le ⟨c, rfl⟩⟩ * ⟨x, hx⟩:S).2 }
instance coe_to_submodule : has_coe (subalgebra R A) (submodule R A) :=
⟨to_submodule⟩
instance to_submodule.is_subring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A]
(S : subalgebra R A) : is_subring ((S : submodule R A) : set A) := S.is_subring
@[simp] lemma mem_to_submodule {x} : x ∈ (S : submodule R A) ↔ x ∈ S := iff.rfl
theorem to_submodule_injective {S U : subalgebra R A} (h : (S : submodule R A) = U) : S = U :=
ext $ λ x, by rw [← mem_to_submodule, ← mem_to_submodule, h]
theorem to_submodule_inj {S U : subalgebra R A} : (S : submodule R A) = U ↔ S = U :=
⟨to_submodule_injective, congr_arg _⟩
instance : partial_order (subalgebra R A) :=
{ le := λ S T, (S : set A) ⊆ (T : set A),
le_refl := λ S, set.subset.refl S,
le_trans := λ _ _ _, set.subset.trans,
le_antisymm := λ S T hst hts, ext $ λ x, ⟨@hst x, @hts x⟩ }
/-- Reinterpret an `S`-subalgebra as an `R`-subalgebra in `comap R S A`. -/
def comap {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {A : Type w}
[comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [semiring A] [algebra R S] [algebra S A]
(iSB : subalgebra S A) : subalgebra R (algebra.comap R S A) :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ r, iSB.algebra_map_mem (algebra_map R S r),
.. iSB }
/-- If `S` is an `R`-subalgebra of `A` and `T` is an `S`-subalgebra of `A`,
then `T` is an `R`-subalgebra of `A`. -/
def under {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
{i : algebra R A} (S : subalgebra R A)
(T : subalgebra S A) : subalgebra R A :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ r, T.algebra_map_mem ⟨algebra_map R A r, S.algebra_map_mem r⟩,
.. T }
/-- Transport a subalgebra via an algebra homomorphism. -/
def map (S : subalgebra R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : subalgebra R B :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ r, f.commutes r ▸ set.mem_image_of_mem _ (S.algebra_map_mem r),
.. subsemiring.map (f : A →+* B) S,}
/-- Preimage of a subalgebra under an algebra homomorphism. -/
def comap' (S : subalgebra R B) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : subalgebra R A :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ r, show f (algebra_map R A r) ∈ S,
from (f.commutes r).symm ▸ S.algebra_map_mem r,
.. subsemiring.comap (f : A →+* B) S,}
lemma map_mono {S₁ S₂ : subalgebra R A} {f : A →ₐ[R] B} :
S₁ ≤ S₂ → S₁.map f ≤ S₂.map f :=
set.image_subset f
theorem map_le {S : subalgebra R A} {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {U : subalgebra R B} :
map S f ≤ U ↔ S ≤ comap' U f :=
set.image_subset_iff
lemma map_injective {S₁ S₂ : subalgebra R A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B)
(hf : function.injective f) (ih : S₁.map f = S₂.map f) : S₁ = S₂ :=
ext $ set.ext_iff.1 $ set.image_injective.2 hf $ set.ext $ ext_iff.1 ih
lemma mem_map {S : subalgebra R A} {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {y : B} :
y ∈ map S f ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
subsemiring.mem_map
instance integral_domain {R A : Type*} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain A] [algebra R A]
(S : subalgebra R A) : integral_domain S :=
@subring.domain A _ S _
end subalgebra
namespace alg_hom
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
variables (φ : A →ₐ[R] B)
/-- Range of an `alg_hom` as a subalgebra. -/
protected def range (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) : subalgebra R B :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ r, ⟨algebra_map R A r, set.mem_univ _, φ.commutes r⟩,
.. φ.to_ring_hom.srange }
@[simp] lemma mem_range (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) {y : B} :
y ∈ φ.range ↔ ∃ x, φ x = y := ring_hom.mem_srange
@[simp] lemma coe_range (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) : (φ.range : set B) = set.range φ :=
by { ext, rw [subalgebra.mem_coe, mem_range], refl }
/-- Restrict the codomain of an algebra homomorphism. -/
def cod_restrict (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (S : subalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : A →ₐ[R] S :=
{ commutes' := λ r, subtype.eq $ f.commutes r,
.. ring_hom.cod_srestrict (f : A →+* B) S hf }
theorem injective_cod_restrict (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (S : subalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) :
function.injective (f.cod_restrict S hf) ↔ function.injective f :=
⟨λ H x y hxy, H $ subtype.eq hxy, λ H x y hxy, H (congr_arg subtype.val hxy : _)⟩
end alg_hom
namespace algebra
variables (R : Type u) {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [semiring B] [algebra R B]
/-- The minimal subalgebra that includes `s`. -/
def adjoin (s : set A) : subalgebra R A :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ r, subsemiring.subset_closure $ or.inl ⟨r, rfl⟩,
.. subsemiring.closure (set.range (algebra_map R A) ∪ s) }
variables {R}
protected lemma gc : galois_connection (adjoin R : set A → subalgebra R A) coe :=
λ s S, ⟨λ H, le_trans (le_trans (set.subset_union_right _ _) subsemiring.subset_closure) H,
λ H, subsemiring.closure_le.2 $ set.union_subset S.range_subset H⟩
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `coe`. -/
protected def gi : galois_insertion (adjoin R : set A → subalgebra R A) coe :=
{ choice := λ s hs, adjoin R s,
gc := algebra.gc,
le_l_u := λ S, (algebra.gc (S : set A) (adjoin R S)).1 $ le_refl _,
choice_eq := λ _ _, rfl }
instance : complete_lattice (subalgebra R A) :=
galois_insertion.lift_complete_lattice algebra.gi
instance : inhabited (subalgebra R A) := ⟨⊥⟩
theorem mem_bot {x : A} : x ∈ (⊥ : subalgebra R A) ↔ x ∈ set.range (algebra_map R A) :=
suffices (of_id R A).range = (⊥ : subalgebra R A),
by { rw [← this, ← subalgebra.mem_coe, alg_hom.coe_range], refl },
le_bot_iff.mp (λ x hx, subalgebra.range_le _ ((of_id R A).coe_range ▸ hx))
@[simp] theorem mem_top {x : A} : x ∈ (⊤ : subalgebra R A) :=
subsemiring.subset_closure $ or.inr trivial
@[simp] theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : subalgebra R A) : submodule R A) = ⊤ :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, iff_of_true mem_top trivial
@[simp] theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : subalgebra R A) : set A) = set.range (algebra_map R A) :=
by simp [set.ext_iff, algebra.mem_bot]
theorem eq_top_iff {S : subalgebra R A} :
S = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : A, x ∈ S :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h; exact mem_top, λ h, by ext x; exact ⟨λ _, mem_top, λ _, h x⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem map_top (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : subalgebra.map (⊤ : subalgebra R A) f = f.range :=
subalgebra.ext $ λ x,
⟨λ ⟨y, _, hy⟩, ⟨y, set.mem_univ _, hy⟩, λ ⟨y, mem, hy⟩, ⟨y, algebra.mem_top, hy⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem map_bot (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : subalgebra.map (⊥ : subalgebra R A) f = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ x ⟨y, hy, hfy⟩, let ⟨r, hr⟩ := mem_bot.1 hy in subalgebra.range_le _
⟨r, by rwa [← f.commutes, hr]⟩
@[simp] theorem comap_top (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : subalgebra.comap' (⊤ : subalgebra R B) f = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ λ x, mem_top
/-- `alg_hom` to `⊤ : subalgebra R A`. -/
def to_top : A →ₐ[R] (⊤ : subalgebra R A) :=
by refine_struct { to_fun := λ x, (⟨x, mem_top⟩ : (⊤ : subalgebra R A)) }; intros; refl
theorem surjective_algebra_map_iff :
function.surjective (algebra_map R A) ↔ (⊤ : subalgebra R A) = ⊥ :=
⟨λ h, eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ y _, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h y in hx ▸ subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ _,
λ h y, algebra.mem_bot.1 $ eq_bot_iff.1 h (algebra.mem_top : y ∈ _)⟩
theorem bijective_algebra_map_iff {R A : Type*} [field R] [semiring A] [nontrivial A] [algebra R A] :
function.bijective (algebra_map R A) ↔ (⊤ : subalgebra R A) = ⊥ :=
⟨λ h, surjective_algebra_map_iff.1 h.2,
λ h, ⟨(algebra_map R A).injective, surjective_algebra_map_iff.2 h⟩⟩
/-- The bottom subalgebra is isomorphic to the base ring. -/
noncomputable def bot_equiv_of_injective (h : function.injective (algebra_map R A)) :
(⊥ : subalgebra R A) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
alg_equiv.symm $ alg_equiv.of_bijective (algebra.of_id R _)
⟨λ x y hxy, h (congr_arg subtype.val hxy : _),
λ ⟨y, hy⟩, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := algebra.mem_bot.1 hy in ⟨x, subtype.eq hx⟩⟩
/-- The bottom subalgebra is isomorphic to the field. -/
noncomputable def bot_equiv (F R : Type*) [field F] [semiring R] [nontrivial R] [algebra F R] :
(⊥ : subalgebra F R) ≃ₐ[F] F :=
bot_equiv_of_injective (ring_hom.injective _)
end algebra
namespace subalgebra
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v}
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables (S : subalgebra R A)
lemma range_val : S.val.range = S :=
ext $ set.ext_iff.1 $ S.val.coe_range.trans subtype.range_val
end subalgebra
section nat
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R]
/-- A subsemiring is a `ℕ`-subalgebra. -/
def subalgebra_of_subsemiring (S : subsemiring R) : subalgebra ℕ R :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ i, S.coe_nat_mem i,
.. S }
@[simp] lemma mem_subalgebra_of_subsemiring {x : R} {S : subsemiring R} :
x ∈ subalgebra_of_subsemiring S ↔ x ∈ S :=
iff.rfl
end nat
section int
variables {R : Type*} [ring R]
/-- A subring is a `ℤ`-subalgebra. -/
def subalgebra_of_subring (S : subring R) : subalgebra ℤ R :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ i, int.induction_on i S.zero_mem
(λ i ih, S.add_mem ih S.one_mem)
(λ i ih, show ((-i - 1 : ℤ) : R) ∈ S, by { rw [int.cast_sub, int.cast_one],
exact S.sub_mem ih S.one_mem }),
.. S }
/-- A subset closed under the ring operations is a `ℤ`-subalgebra. -/
def subalgebra_of_is_subring (S : set R) [is_subring S] : subalgebra ℤ R :=
subalgebra_of_subring S.to_subring
variables {S : Type*} [semiring S]
@[simp] lemma mem_subalgebra_of_subring {x : R} {S : subring R} :
x ∈ subalgebra_of_subring S ↔ x ∈ S :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_subalgebra_of_is_subring {x : R} {S : set R} [is_subring S] :
x ∈ subalgebra_of_is_subring S ↔ x ∈ S :=
iff.rfl
end int
|
988c74969c8030008514c56cfcba334771623795 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/binary_products.lean | 2acc45e42b173e0f71e63d742fbc50e60624bab4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 39,397 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.limits.shapes.terminal
import category_theory.discrete_category
import category_theory.epi_mono
import category_theory.over
/-!
# Binary (co)products
We define a category `walking_pair`, which is the index category
for a binary (co)product diagram. A convenience method `pair X Y`
constructs the functor from the walking pair, hitting the given objects.
We define `prod X Y` and `coprod X Y` as limits and colimits of such functors.
Typeclasses `has_binary_products` and `has_binary_coproducts` assert the existence
of (co)limits shaped as walking pairs.
We include lemmas for simplifying equations involving projections and coprojections, and define
braiding and associating isomorphisms, and the product comparison morphism.
## References
* [Stacks: Products of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001R)
* [Stacks: coproducts of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04AN)
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u u₂
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a binary (co)product. -/
@[derive decidable_eq, derive inhabited]
inductive walking_pair : Type v
| left | right
open walking_pair
/--
The equivalence swapping left and right.
-/
def walking_pair.swap : walking_pair ≃ walking_pair :=
{ to_fun := λ j, walking_pair.rec_on j right left,
inv_fun := λ j, walking_pair.rec_on j right left,
left_inv := λ j, by { cases j; refl, },
right_inv := λ j, by { cases j; refl, }, }
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.swap_apply_left : walking_pair.swap left = right := rfl
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.swap_apply_right : walking_pair.swap right = left := rfl
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_tt : walking_pair.swap.symm left = right := rfl
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_ff : walking_pair.swap.symm right = left := rfl
/--
An equivalence from `walking_pair` to `bool`, sometimes useful when reindexing limits.
-/
def walking_pair.equiv_bool : walking_pair ≃ bool :=
{ to_fun := λ j, walking_pair.rec_on j tt ff, -- to match equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool
inv_fun := λ b, bool.rec_on b right left,
left_inv := λ j, by { cases j; refl, },
right_inv := λ b, by { cases b; refl, }, }
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_left : walking_pair.equiv_bool left = tt := rfl
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_right : walking_pair.equiv_bool right = ff := rfl
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_tt : walking_pair.equiv_bool.symm tt = left := rfl
@[simp] lemma walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_ff : walking_pair.equiv_bool.symm ff = right := rfl
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
/-- The diagram on the walking pair, sending the two points to `X` and `Y`. -/
def pair (X Y : C) : discrete walking_pair.{v} ⥤ C :=
discrete.functor (λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j X Y)
@[simp] lemma pair_obj_left (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj left = X := rfl
@[simp] lemma pair_obj_right (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj right = Y := rfl
section
variables {F G : discrete walking_pair.{v} ⥤ C} (f : F.obj left ⟶ G.obj left)
(g : F.obj right ⟶ G.obj right)
/-- The natural transformation between two functors out of the walking pair, specified by its
components. -/
def map_pair : F ⟶ G := { app := λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j f g }
@[simp] lemma map_pair_left : (map_pair f g).app left = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_pair_right : (map_pair f g).app right = g := rfl
/-- The natural isomorphism between two functors out of the walking pair, specified by its
components. -/
@[simps]
def map_pair_iso (f : F.obj left ≅ G.obj left) (g : F.obj right ≅ G.obj right) : F ≅ G :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j f g) (by tidy)
end
/-- Every functor out of the walking pair is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `pair` -/
@[simps]
def diagram_iso_pair (F : discrete walking_pair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ pair (F.obj walking_pair.left) (F.obj walking_pair.right) :=
map_pair_iso (iso.refl _) (iso.refl _)
section
variables {D : Type u} [category.{v} D]
/-- The natural isomorphism between `pair X Y ⋙ F` and `pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)`. -/
def pair_comp (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) : pair X Y ⋙ F ≅ pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
diagram_iso_pair _
end
/-- A binary fan is just a cone on a diagram indexing a product. -/
abbreviation binary_fan (X Y : C) := cone (pair X Y)
/-- The first projection of a binary fan. -/
abbreviation binary_fan.fst {X Y : C} (s : binary_fan X Y) := s.π.app walking_pair.left
/-- The second projection of a binary fan. -/
abbreviation binary_fan.snd {X Y : C} (s : binary_fan X Y) := s.π.app walking_pair.right
@[simp] lemma binary_fan.π_app_left {X Y : C} (s : binary_fan X Y) :
s.π.app walking_pair.left = s.fst := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_fan.π_app_right {X Y : C} (s : binary_fan X Y) :
s.π.app walking_pair.right = s.snd := rfl
lemma binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : binary_fan X Y} (h : is_limit s)
{f g : W ⟶ s.X} (h₁ : f ≫ s.fst = g ≫ s.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ s.snd = g ≫ s.snd) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext $ λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j h₁ h₂
/-- A binary cofan is just a cocone on a diagram indexing a coproduct. -/
abbreviation binary_cofan (X Y : C) := cocone (pair X Y)
/-- The first inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbreviation binary_cofan.inl {X Y : C} (s : binary_cofan X Y) := s.ι.app walking_pair.left
/-- The second inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbreviation binary_cofan.inr {X Y : C} (s : binary_cofan X Y) := s.ι.app walking_pair.right
@[simp] lemma binary_cofan.ι_app_left {X Y : C} (s : binary_cofan X Y) :
s.ι.app walking_pair.left = s.inl := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_cofan.ι_app_right {X Y : C} (s : binary_cofan X Y) :
s.ι.app walking_pair.right = s.inr := rfl
lemma binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : binary_cofan X Y} (h : is_colimit s)
{f g : s.X ⟶ W} (h₁ : s.inl ≫ f = s.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : s.inr ≫ f = s.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext $ λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j h₁ h₂
variables {X Y : C}
/-- A binary fan with vertex `P` consists of the two projections `π₁ : P ⟶ X` and `π₂ : P ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps X]
def binary_fan.mk {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : binary_fan X Y :=
{ X := P,
π := { app := λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j π₁ π₂ }}
/-- A binary cofan with vertex `P` consists of the two inclusions `ι₁ : X ⟶ P` and `ι₂ : Y ⟶ P`. -/
@[simps X]
def binary_cofan.mk {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : binary_cofan X Y :=
{ X := P,
ι := { app := λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j ι₁ ι₂ }}
@[simp] lemma binary_fan.mk_π_app_left {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) :
(binary_fan.mk π₁ π₂).π.app walking_pair.left = π₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_fan.mk_π_app_right {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) :
(binary_fan.mk π₁ π₂).π.app walking_pair.right = π₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_cofan.mk_ι_app_left {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) :
(binary_cofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).ι.app walking_pair.left = ι₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_cofan.mk_ι_app_right {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) :
(binary_cofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).ι.app walking_pair.right = ι₂ := rfl
/-- If `s` is a limit binary fan over `X` and `Y`, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and
`g : W ⟶ Y` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ s.X` satisfying `l ≫ s.fst = f` and `l ≫ s.snd = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def binary_fan.is_limit.lift' {W X Y : C} {s : binary_fan X Y} (h : is_limit s) (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) : {l : W ⟶ s.X // l ≫ s.fst = f ∧ l ≫ s.snd = g} :=
⟨h.lift $ binary_fan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
/-- If `s` is a colimit binary cofan over `X` and `Y`,, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `l : s.X ⟶ W` satisfying `s.inl ≫ l = f` and `s.inr ≫ l = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def binary_cofan.is_colimit.desc' {W X Y : C} {s : binary_cofan X Y} (h : is_colimit s) (f : X ⟶ W)
(g : Y ⟶ W) : {l : s.X ⟶ W // s.inl ≫ l = f ∧ s.inr ≫ l = g} :=
⟨h.desc $ binary_cofan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
/-- An abbreviation for `has_limit (pair X Y)`. -/
abbreviation has_binary_product (X Y : C) := has_limit (pair X Y)
/-- An abbreviation for `has_colimit (pair X Y)`. -/
abbreviation has_binary_coproduct (X Y : C) := has_colimit (pair X Y)
/-- If we have a product of `X` and `Y`, we can access it using `prod X Y` or
`X ⨯ Y`. -/
abbreviation prod (X Y : C) [has_binary_product X Y] := limit (pair X Y)
/-- If we have a coproduct of `X` and `Y`, we can access it using `coprod X Y ` or
`X ⨿ Y`. -/
abbreviation coprod (X Y : C) [has_binary_coproduct X Y] := colimit (pair X Y)
notation X ` ⨯ `:20 Y:20 := prod X Y
notation X ` ⨿ `:20 Y:20 := coprod X Y
/-- The projection map to the first component of the product. -/
abbreviation prod.fst {X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X :=
limit.π (pair X Y) walking_pair.left
/-- The projecton map to the second component of the product. -/
abbreviation prod.snd {X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (pair X Y) walking_pair.right
/-- The inclusion map from the first component of the coproduct. -/
abbreviation coprod.inl {X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) walking_pair.left
/-- The inclusion map from the second component of the coproduct. -/
abbreviation coprod.inr {X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) walking_pair.right
/-- The binary fan constructed from the projection maps is a limit. -/
def prod_is_prod (X Y : C) [has_binary_product X Y] :
is_limit (binary_fan.mk (prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X) prod.snd) :=
(limit.is_limit _).of_iso_limit (cones.ext (iso.refl _) (by { rintro (_ | _), tidy }))
/-- The binary cofan constructed from the coprojection maps is a colimit. -/
def coprod_is_coprod (X Y : C) [has_binary_coproduct X Y] :
is_colimit (binary_cofan.mk (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) coprod.inr) :=
(colimit.is_colimit _).of_iso_colimit (cocones.ext (iso.refl _) (by { rintro (_ | _), tidy }))
@[ext] lemma prod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] {f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y}
(h₁ : f ≫ prod.fst = g ≫ prod.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ prod.snd = g ≫ prod.snd) : f = g :=
binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext (limit.is_limit _) h₁ h₂
@[ext] lemma coprod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] {f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W}
(h₁ : coprod.inl ≫ f = coprod.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : coprod.inr ≫ f = coprod.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext (colimit.is_colimit _) h₁ h₂
/-- If the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and `g : W ⟶ Y`
induces a morphism `prod.lift f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y`. -/
abbreviation prod.lift {W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y :=
limit.lift _ (binary_fan.mk f g)
/-- diagonal arrow of the binary product in the category `fam I` -/
abbreviation diag (X : C) [has_binary_product X X] : X ⟶ X ⨯ X :=
prod.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
/-- If the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `coprod.desc f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W`. -/
abbreviation coprod.desc {W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
X ⨿ Y ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (binary_cofan.mk f g)
/-- codiagonal arrow of the binary coproduct -/
abbreviation codiag (X : C) [has_binary_coproduct X X] : X ⨿ X ⟶ X :=
coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.lift_fst {W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.fst = f :=
limit.lift_π _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.lift_snd {W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.snd = g :=
limit.lift_π _ _
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma coprod.inl_desc {W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc f g = f :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma coprod.inr_desc {W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc f g = g :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[mono f] : mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac $ prod.lift_fst _ _
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[mono g] : mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac $ prod.lift_snd _ _
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left {W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[epi f] : epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac $ coprod.inl_desc _ _
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right {W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[epi g] : epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac $ coprod.inr_desc _ _
/-- If the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and `g : W ⟶ Y`
induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y` satisfying `l ≫ prod.fst = f` and `l ≫ prod.snd = g`. -/
def prod.lift' {W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
{l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y // l ≫ prod.fst = f ∧ l ≫ prod.snd = g} :=
⟨prod.lift f g, prod.lift_fst _ _, prod.lift_snd _ _⟩
/-- If the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W` satisfying `coprod.inl ≫ l = f` and
`coprod.inr ≫ l = g`. -/
def coprod.desc' {W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
{l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W // coprod.inl ≫ l = f ∧ coprod.inr ≫ l = g} :=
⟨coprod.desc f g, coprod.inl_desc _ _, coprod.inr_desc _ _⟩
/-- If the products `W ⨯ X` and `Y ⨯ Z` exist, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ Y` and
`g : X ⟶ Z` induces a morphism `prod.map f g : W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z`. -/
def prod.map {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_product W X] [has_binary_product Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z :=
lim_map (map_pair f g)
/-- If the coproducts `W ⨿ X` and `Y ⨿ Z` exist, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ Y` and
`g : W ⟶ Z` induces a morphism `coprod.map f g : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z`. -/
def coprod.map {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_coproduct W X] [has_binary_coproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z :=
colim_map (map_pair f g)
section prod_lemmas
-- Making the reassoc version of this a simp lemma seems to be more harmful than helpful.
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma prod.comp_lift {V W X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : W ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ prod.lift g h = prod.lift (f ≫ g) (f ≫ h) :=
by { ext; simp }
lemma prod.comp_diag {X Y : C} [has_binary_product Y Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ diag Y = prod.lift f f :=
by simp
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.map_fst {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_product W X] [has_binary_product Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.fst = prod.fst ≫ f :=
lim_map_π _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.map_snd {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_product W X] [has_binary_product Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.snd = prod.snd ≫ g :=
lim_map_π _ _
@[simp] lemma prod.map_id_id {X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] :
prod.map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ :=
by { ext; simp }
@[simp] lemma prod.lift_fst_snd {X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y] :
prod.lift prod.fst prod.snd = 𝟙 (X ⨯ Y) :=
by { ext; simp }
@[simp, reassoc] lemma prod.lift_map {V W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_product W X]
[has_binary_product Y Z] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : V ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) (k : X ⟶ Z) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.lift (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) :=
by { ext; simp }
@[simp] lemma prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_product W Y]
[has_binary_product X Z] (g : W ⟶ X) (g' : Y ⟶ Z) :
prod.lift (prod.fst ≫ g) (prod.snd ≫ g') = prod.map g g' :=
by { rw ← prod.lift_map, simp }
-- We take the right hand side here to be simp normal form, as this way composition lemmas for
-- `f ≫ h` and `g ≫ k` can fire (eg `id_comp`) , while `map_fst` and `map_snd` can still work just
-- as well.
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.map_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ B₁ B₂ B₃ : C}
[has_binary_product A₁ B₁] [has_binary_product A₂ B₂] [has_binary_product A₃ B₃]
(f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : B₁ ⟶ B₂) (h : A₂ ⟶ A₃) (k : B₂ ⟶ B₃) :
prod.map f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.map (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) :=
by { ext; simp }
-- TODO: is it necessary to weaken the assumption here?
@[reassoc]
lemma prod.map_swap {A B X Y : C} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : X ⟶ Y)
[has_limits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair.{v}) C] :
prod.map (𝟙 X) f ≫ prod.map g (𝟙 B) = prod.map g (𝟙 A) ≫ prod.map (𝟙 Y) f :=
by simp
@[reassoc] lemma prod.map_comp_id {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[has_binary_product X W] [has_binary_product Z W] [has_binary_product Y W] :
prod.map (f ≫ g) (𝟙 W) = prod.map f (𝟙 W) ≫ prod.map g (𝟙 W) :=
by simp
@[reassoc] lemma prod.map_id_comp {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[has_binary_product W X] [has_binary_product W Y] [has_binary_product W Z] :
prod.map (𝟙 W) (f ≫ g) = prod.map (𝟙 W) f ≫ prod.map (𝟙 W) g :=
by simp
/-- If the products `W ⨯ X` and `Y ⨯ Z` exist, then every pair of isomorphisms `f : W ≅ Y` and
`g : X ≅ Z` induces an isomorphism `prod.map_iso f g : W ⨯ X ≅ Y ⨯ Z`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.map_iso {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_product W X] [has_binary_product Y Z]
(f : W ≅ Y) (g : X ≅ Z) : W ⨯ X ≅ Y ⨯ Z :=
{ hom := prod.map f.hom g.hom,
inv := prod.map f.inv g.inv }
instance is_iso_prod {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_product W X] [has_binary_product Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [is_iso f] [is_iso g] : is_iso (prod.map f g) :=
is_iso.of_iso (prod.map_iso (as_iso f) (as_iso g))
instance prod.map_mono {C : Type*} [category C] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [mono f]
[mono g] [has_binary_product W X] [has_binary_product Y Z] : mono (prod.map f g) :=
⟨λ A i₁ i₂ h, begin
ext,
{ rw ← cancel_mono f, simpa using congr_arg (λ f, f ≫ prod.fst) h },
{ rw ← cancel_mono g, simpa using congr_arg (λ f, f ≫ prod.snd) h }
end⟩
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.diag_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [has_binary_product X X] [has_binary_product Y Y] :
diag X ≫ prod.map f f = f ≫ diag Y :=
by simp
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.diag_map_fst_snd {X Y : C} [has_binary_product X Y]
[has_binary_product (X ⨯ Y) (X ⨯ Y)] :
diag (X ⨯ Y) ≫ prod.map prod.fst prod.snd = 𝟙 (X ⨯ Y) :=
by simp
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod.diag_map_fst_snd_comp [has_limits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair.{v}) C]
{X X' Y Y' : C} (g : X ⟶ Y) (g' : X' ⟶ Y') :
diag (X ⨯ X') ≫ prod.map (prod.fst ≫ g) (prod.snd ≫ g') = prod.map g g' :=
by simp
instance {X : C} [has_binary_product X X] : split_mono (diag X) :=
{ retraction := prod.fst }
end prod_lemmas
section coprod_lemmas
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma coprod.desc_comp {V W X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : X ⟶ V)
(h : Y ⟶ V) :
coprod.desc g h ≫ f = coprod.desc (g ≫ f) (h ≫ f) :=
by { ext; simp }
lemma coprod.diag_comp {X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X X] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
codiag X ≫ f = coprod.desc f f :=
by simp
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma coprod.inl_map {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_coproduct W X] [has_binary_coproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : coprod.inl ≫ coprod.map f g = f ≫ coprod.inl :=
ι_colim_map _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma coprod.inr_map {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_coproduct W X] [has_binary_coproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : coprod.inr ≫ coprod.map f g = g ≫ coprod.inr :=
ι_colim_map _ _
@[simp]
lemma coprod.map_id_id {X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] :
coprod.map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ :=
by { ext; simp }
@[simp]
lemma coprod.desc_inl_inr {X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y] :
coprod.desc coprod.inl coprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⨿ Y) :=
by { ext; simp }
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma coprod.map_desc {S T U V W : C} [has_binary_coproduct U W] [has_binary_coproduct T V]
(f : U ⟶ S) (g : W ⟶ S) (h : T ⟶ U) (k : V ⟶ W) :
coprod.map h k ≫ coprod.desc f g = coprod.desc (h ≫ f) (k ≫ g) :=
by { ext; simp }
@[simp]
lemma coprod.desc_comp_inl_comp_inr {W X Y Z : C}
[has_binary_coproduct W Y] [has_binary_coproduct X Z]
(g : W ⟶ X) (g' : Y ⟶ Z) :
coprod.desc (g ≫ coprod.inl) (g' ≫ coprod.inr) = coprod.map g g' :=
by { rw ← coprod.map_desc, simp }
-- We take the right hand side here to be simp normal form, as this way composition lemmas for
-- `f ≫ h` and `g ≫ k` can fire (eg `id_comp`) , while `inl_map` and `inr_map` can still work just
-- as well.
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma coprod.map_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ B₁ B₂ B₃ : C}
[has_binary_coproduct A₁ B₁] [has_binary_coproduct A₂ B₂] [has_binary_coproduct A₃ B₃]
(f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : B₁ ⟶ B₂) (h : A₂ ⟶ A₃) (k : B₂ ⟶ B₃) :
coprod.map f g ≫ coprod.map h k = coprod.map (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) :=
by { ext; simp }
-- I don't think it's a good idea to make any of the following three simp lemmas.
@[reassoc]
lemma coprod.map_swap {A B X Y : C} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : X ⟶ Y)
[has_colimits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair.{v}) C] :
coprod.map (𝟙 X) f ≫ coprod.map g (𝟙 B) = coprod.map g (𝟙 A) ≫ coprod.map (𝟙 Y) f :=
by simp
@[reassoc] lemma coprod.map_comp_id {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[has_binary_coproduct Z W] [has_binary_coproduct Y W] [has_binary_coproduct X W] :
coprod.map (f ≫ g) (𝟙 W) = coprod.map f (𝟙 W) ≫ coprod.map g (𝟙 W) :=
by simp
@[reassoc] lemma coprod.map_id_comp {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[has_binary_coproduct W X] [has_binary_coproduct W Y] [has_binary_coproduct W Z] :
coprod.map (𝟙 W) (f ≫ g) = coprod.map (𝟙 W) f ≫ coprod.map (𝟙 W) g :=
by simp
/-- If the coproducts `W ⨿ X` and `Y ⨿ Z` exist, then every pair of isomorphisms `f : W ≅ Y` and
`g : W ≅ Z` induces a isomorphism `coprod.map_iso f g : W ⨿ X ≅ Y ⨿ Z`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.map_iso {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_coproduct W X] [has_binary_coproduct Y Z]
(f : W ≅ Y) (g : X ≅ Z) : W ⨿ X ≅ Y ⨿ Z :=
{ hom := coprod.map f.hom g.hom,
inv := coprod.map f.inv g.inv }
instance is_iso_coprod {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_coproduct W X] [has_binary_coproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [is_iso f] [is_iso g] : is_iso (coprod.map f g) :=
is_iso.of_iso (coprod.map_iso (as_iso f) (as_iso g))
instance coprod.map_epi {C : Type*} [category C] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [epi f]
[epi g] [has_binary_coproduct W X] [has_binary_coproduct Y Z] : epi (coprod.map f g) :=
⟨λ A i₁ i₂ h, begin
ext,
{ rw ← cancel_epi f, simpa using congr_arg (λ f, coprod.inl ≫ f) h },
{ rw ← cancel_epi g, simpa using congr_arg (λ f, coprod.inr ≫ f) h }
end⟩
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma coprod.map_codiag {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [has_binary_coproduct X X]
[has_binary_coproduct Y Y] :
coprod.map f f ≫ codiag Y = codiag X ≫ f :=
by simp
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma coprod.map_inl_inr_codiag {X Y : C} [has_binary_coproduct X Y]
[has_binary_coproduct (X ⨿ Y) (X ⨿ Y)] :
coprod.map coprod.inl coprod.inr ≫ codiag (X ⨿ Y) = 𝟙 (X ⨿ Y) :=
by simp
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma coprod.map_comp_inl_inr_codiag [has_colimits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair.{v}) C]
{X X' Y Y' : C} (g : X ⟶ Y) (g' : X' ⟶ Y') :
coprod.map (g ≫ coprod.inl) (g' ≫ coprod.inr) ≫ codiag (Y ⨿ Y') = coprod.map g g' :=
by simp
end coprod_lemmas
variables (C)
/--
`has_binary_products` represents a choice of product for every pair of objects.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001T>.
-/
abbreviation has_binary_products := has_limits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair.{v}) C
/--
`has_binary_coproducts` represents a choice of coproduct for every pair of objects.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04AP>.
-/
abbreviation has_binary_coproducts := has_colimits_of_shape (discrete walking_pair.{v}) C
/-- If `C` has all limits of diagrams `pair X Y`, then it has all binary products -/
lemma has_binary_products_of_has_limit_pair [Π {X Y : C}, has_limit (pair X Y)] :
has_binary_products C :=
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit_of_iso (diagram_iso_pair F).symm }
/-- If `C` has all colimits of diagrams `pair X Y`, then it has all binary coproducts -/
lemma has_binary_coproducts_of_has_colimit_pair [Π {X Y : C}, has_colimit (pair X Y)] :
has_binary_coproducts C :=
{ has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit_of_iso (diagram_iso_pair F) }
section
variables {C}
/-- The braiding isomorphism which swaps a binary product. -/
@[simps] def prod.braiding (P Q : C) [has_binary_product P Q] [has_binary_product Q P] :
P ⨯ Q ≅ Q ⨯ P :=
{ hom := prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst,
inv := prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst }
/-- The braiding isomorphism can be passed through a map by swapping the order. -/
@[reassoc] lemma braid_natural [has_binary_products C] {W X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Z ⟶ W) :
prod.map f g ≫ (prod.braiding _ _).hom = (prod.braiding _ _).hom ≫ prod.map g f :=
by simp
@[reassoc] lemma prod.symmetry' (P Q : C) [has_binary_product P Q] [has_binary_product Q P] :
prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst ≫ prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst = 𝟙 (P ⨯ Q) :=
(prod.braiding _ _).hom_inv_id
/-- The braiding isomorphism is symmetric. -/
@[reassoc] lemma prod.symmetry (P Q : C) [has_binary_product P Q] [has_binary_product Q P] :
(prod.braiding P Q).hom ≫ (prod.braiding Q P).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
(prod.braiding _ _).hom_inv_id
/-- The associator isomorphism for binary products. -/
@[simps] def prod.associator [has_binary_products C] (P Q R : C) :
(P ⨯ Q) ⨯ R ≅ P ⨯ (Q ⨯ R) :=
{ hom :=
prod.lift
(prod.fst ≫ prod.fst)
(prod.lift (prod.fst ≫ prod.snd) prod.snd),
inv :=
prod.lift
(prod.lift prod.fst (prod.snd ≫ prod.fst))
(prod.snd ≫ prod.snd) }
@[reassoc]
lemma prod.pentagon [has_binary_products C] (W X Y Z : C) :
prod.map ((prod.associator W X Y).hom) (𝟙 Z) ≫
(prod.associator W (X ⨯ Y) Z).hom ≫ prod.map (𝟙 W) ((prod.associator X Y Z).hom) =
(prod.associator (W ⨯ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (prod.associator W X (Y ⨯ Z)).hom :=
by simp
@[reassoc]
lemma prod.associator_naturality [has_binary_products C] {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C}
(f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃) :
prod.map (prod.map f₁ f₂) f₃ ≫ (prod.associator Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom =
(prod.associator X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ prod.map f₁ (prod.map f₂ f₃) :=
by simp
variables [has_terminal C]
/-- The left unitor isomorphism for binary products with the terminal object. -/
@[simps] def prod.left_unitor (P : C) [has_binary_product (⊤_ C) P] :
⊤_ C ⨯ P ≅ P :=
{ hom := prod.snd,
inv := prod.lift (terminal.from P) (𝟙 _) }
/-- The right unitor isomorphism for binary products with the terminal object. -/
@[simps] def prod.right_unitor (P : C) [has_binary_product P (⊤_ C)] :
P ⨯ ⊤_ C ≅ P :=
{ hom := prod.fst,
inv := prod.lift (𝟙 _) (terminal.from P) }
@[reassoc]
lemma prod.left_unitor_hom_naturality [has_binary_products C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.map (𝟙 _) f ≫ (prod.left_unitor Y).hom = (prod.left_unitor X).hom ≫ f :=
prod.map_snd _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma prod.left_unitor_inv_naturality [has_binary_products C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(prod.left_unitor X).inv ≫ prod.map (𝟙 _) f = f ≫ (prod.left_unitor Y).inv :=
by rw [iso.inv_comp_eq, ← category.assoc, iso.eq_comp_inv, prod.left_unitor_hom_naturality]
@[reassoc]
lemma prod.right_unitor_hom_naturality [has_binary_products C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.map f (𝟙 _) ≫ (prod.right_unitor Y).hom = (prod.right_unitor X).hom ≫ f :=
prod.map_fst _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma prod_right_unitor_inv_naturality [has_binary_products C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(prod.right_unitor X).inv ≫ prod.map f (𝟙 _) = f ≫ (prod.right_unitor Y).inv :=
by rw [iso.inv_comp_eq, ← category.assoc, iso.eq_comp_inv, prod.right_unitor_hom_naturality]
lemma prod.triangle [has_binary_products C] (X Y : C) :
(prod.associator X (⊤_ C) Y).hom ≫ prod.map (𝟙 X) ((prod.left_unitor Y).hom) =
prod.map ((prod.right_unitor X).hom) (𝟙 Y) :=
by tidy
end
section
variables {C} [has_binary_coproducts C]
/-- The braiding isomorphism which swaps a binary coproduct. -/
@[simps] def coprod.braiding (P Q : C) : P ⨿ Q ≅ Q ⨿ P :=
{ hom := coprod.desc coprod.inr coprod.inl,
inv := coprod.desc coprod.inr coprod.inl }
@[reassoc] lemma coprod.symmetry' (P Q : C) :
coprod.desc coprod.inr coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc coprod.inr coprod.inl = 𝟙 (P ⨿ Q) :=
(coprod.braiding _ _).hom_inv_id
/-- The braiding isomorphism is symmetric. -/
lemma coprod.symmetry (P Q : C) :
(coprod.braiding P Q).hom ≫ (coprod.braiding Q P).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
coprod.symmetry' _ _
/-- The associator isomorphism for binary coproducts. -/
@[simps] def coprod.associator
(P Q R : C) : (P ⨿ Q) ⨿ R ≅ P ⨿ (Q ⨿ R) :=
{ hom :=
coprod.desc
(coprod.desc coprod.inl (coprod.inl ≫ coprod.inr))
(coprod.inr ≫ coprod.inr),
inv :=
coprod.desc
(coprod.inl ≫ coprod.inl)
(coprod.desc (coprod.inr ≫ coprod.inl) coprod.inr) }
lemma coprod.pentagon (W X Y Z : C) :
coprod.map ((coprod.associator W X Y).hom) (𝟙 Z) ≫
(coprod.associator W (X ⨿ Y) Z).hom ≫ coprod.map (𝟙 W) ((coprod.associator X Y Z).hom) =
(coprod.associator (W ⨿ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (coprod.associator W X (Y ⨿ Z)).hom :=
by simp
lemma coprod.associator_naturality {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂)
(f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃) :
coprod.map (coprod.map f₁ f₂) f₃ ≫ (coprod.associator Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom =
(coprod.associator X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ coprod.map f₁ (coprod.map f₂ f₃) :=
by simp
variables [has_initial C]
/-- The left unitor isomorphism for binary coproducts with the initial object. -/
@[simps] def coprod.left_unitor
(P : C) : ⊥_ C ⨿ P ≅ P :=
{ hom := coprod.desc (initial.to P) (𝟙 _),
inv := coprod.inr }
/-- The right unitor isomorphism for binary coproducts with the initial object. -/
@[simps] def coprod.right_unitor
(P : C) : P ⨿ ⊥_ C ≅ P :=
{ hom := coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (initial.to P),
inv := coprod.inl }
lemma coprod.triangle (X Y : C) :
(coprod.associator X (⊥_ C) Y).hom ≫ coprod.map (𝟙 X) ((coprod.left_unitor Y).hom) =
coprod.map ((coprod.right_unitor X).hom) (𝟙 Y) :=
by tidy
end
section prod_functor
variables {C} [has_binary_products C]
/-- The binary product functor. -/
@[simps]
def prod.functor : C ⥤ C ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ X, { obj := λ Y, X ⨯ Y, map := λ Y Z, prod.map (𝟙 X) },
map := λ Y Z f, { app := λ T, prod.map f (𝟙 T) }}
/-- The product functor can be decomposed. -/
def prod.functor_left_comp (X Y : C) :
prod.functor.obj (X ⨯ Y) ≅ prod.functor.obj Y ⋙ prod.functor.obj X :=
nat_iso.of_components (prod.associator _ _) (by tidy)
end prod_functor
section coprod_functor
variables {C} [has_binary_coproducts C]
/-- The binary coproduct functor. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.functor : C ⥤ C ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ X, { obj := λ Y, X ⨿ Y, map := λ Y Z, coprod.map (𝟙 X) },
map := λ Y Z f, { app := λ T, coprod.map f (𝟙 T) }}
/-- The coproduct functor can be decomposed. -/
def coprod.functor_left_comp (X Y : C) :
coprod.functor.obj (X ⨿ Y) ≅ coprod.functor.obj Y ⋙ coprod.functor.obj X :=
nat_iso.of_components (coprod.associator _ _) (by tidy)
end coprod_functor
section prod_comparison
variables {C} {D : Type u₂} [category.{v} D]
variables (F : C ⥤ D) {A A' B B' : C}
variables [has_binary_product A B] [has_binary_product A' B']
variables [has_binary_product (F.obj A) (F.obj B)] [has_binary_product (F.obj A') (F.obj B')]
/--
The product comparison morphism.
In `category_theory/limits/preserves` we show this is always an iso iff F preserves binary products.
-/
def prod_comparison (F : C ⥤ D) (A B : C)
[has_binary_product A B] [has_binary_product (F.obj A) (F.obj B)] :
F.obj (A ⨯ B) ⟶ F.obj A ⨯ F.obj B :=
prod.lift (F.map prod.fst) (F.map prod.snd)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod_comparison_fst :
prod_comparison F A B ≫ prod.fst = F.map prod.fst :=
prod.lift_fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma prod_comparison_snd :
prod_comparison F A B ≫ prod.snd = F.map prod.snd :=
prod.lift_snd _ _
/-- Naturality of the prod_comparison morphism in both arguments. -/
@[reassoc] lemma prod_comparison_natural (f : A ⟶ A') (g : B ⟶ B') :
F.map (prod.map f g) ≫ prod_comparison F A' B' =
prod_comparison F A B ≫ prod.map (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
begin
rw [prod_comparison, prod_comparison, prod.lift_map, ← F.map_comp, ← F.map_comp,
prod.comp_lift, ← F.map_comp, prod.map_fst, ← F.map_comp, prod.map_snd]
end
/--
The product comparison morphism from `F(A ⨯ -)` to `FA ⨯ F-`, whose components are given by
`prod_comparison`.
-/
@[simps]
def prod_comparison_nat_trans [has_binary_products C] [has_binary_products D]
(F : C ⥤ D) (A : C) :
prod.functor.obj A ⋙ F ⟶ F ⋙ prod.functor.obj (F.obj A) :=
{ app := λ B, prod_comparison F A B,
naturality' := λ B B' f, by simp [prod_comparison_natural] }
@[reassoc]
lemma inv_prod_comparison_map_fst [is_iso (prod_comparison F A B)] :
inv (prod_comparison F A B) ≫ F.map prod.fst = prod.fst :=
by simp [is_iso.inv_comp_eq]
@[reassoc]
lemma inv_prod_comparison_map_snd [is_iso (prod_comparison F A B)] :
inv (prod_comparison F A B) ≫ F.map prod.snd = prod.snd :=
by simp [is_iso.inv_comp_eq]
/-- If the product comparison morphism is an iso, its inverse is natural. -/
@[reassoc]
lemma prod_comparison_inv_natural (f : A ⟶ A') (g : B ⟶ B')
[is_iso (prod_comparison F A B)] [is_iso (prod_comparison F A' B')] :
inv (prod_comparison F A B) ≫ F.map (prod.map f g) =
prod.map (F.map f) (F.map g) ≫ inv (prod_comparison F A' B') :=
by rw [is_iso.eq_comp_inv, category.assoc, is_iso.inv_comp_eq, prod_comparison_natural]
/--
The natural isomorphism `F(A ⨯ -) ≅ FA ⨯ F-`, provided each `prod_comparison F A B` is an
isomorphism (as `B` changes).
-/
@[simps {rhs_md := semireducible}]
def prod_comparison_nat_iso [has_binary_products C] [has_binary_products D]
(A : C) [∀ B, is_iso (prod_comparison F A B)] :
prod.functor.obj A ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ prod.functor.obj (F.obj A) :=
{ hom := prod_comparison_nat_trans F A
..(@as_iso _ _ _ _ _ (nat_iso.is_iso_of_is_iso_app ⟨_, _⟩)) }
end prod_comparison
section coprod_comparison
variables {C} {D : Type u₂} [category.{v} D]
variables (F : C ⥤ D) {A A' B B' : C}
variables [has_binary_coproduct A B] [has_binary_coproduct A' B']
variables [has_binary_coproduct (F.obj A) (F.obj B)] [has_binary_coproduct (F.obj A') (F.obj B')]
/--
The coproduct comparison morphism.
In `category_theory/limits/preserves` we show
this is always an iso iff F preserves binary coproducts.
-/
def coprod_comparison (F : C ⥤ D) (A B : C)
[has_binary_coproduct A B] [has_binary_coproduct (F.obj A) (F.obj B)] :
F.obj A ⨿ F.obj B ⟶ F.obj (A ⨿ B) :=
coprod.desc (F.map coprod.inl) (F.map coprod.inr)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma coprod_comparison_inl :
coprod.inl ≫ coprod_comparison F A B = F.map coprod.inl :=
coprod.inl_desc _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma coprod_comparison_inr :
coprod.inr ≫ coprod_comparison F A B = F.map coprod.inr :=
coprod.inr_desc _ _
/-- Naturality of the coprod_comparison morphism in both arguments. -/
@[reassoc] lemma coprod_comparison_natural (f : A ⟶ A') (g : B ⟶ B') :
coprod_comparison F A B ≫ F.map (coprod.map f g) =
coprod.map (F.map f) (F.map g) ≫ coprod_comparison F A' B' :=
begin
rw [coprod_comparison, coprod_comparison, coprod.map_desc, ← F.map_comp, ← F.map_comp,
coprod.desc_comp, ← F.map_comp, coprod.inl_map, ← F.map_comp, coprod.inr_map]
end
/--
The coproduct comparison morphism from `FA ⨿ F-` to `F(A ⨿ -)`, whose components are given by
`coprod_comparison`.
-/
@[simps]
def coprod_comparison_nat_trans [has_binary_coproducts C] [has_binary_coproducts D]
(F : C ⥤ D) (A : C) :
F ⋙ coprod.functor.obj (F.obj A) ⟶ coprod.functor.obj A ⋙ F :=
{ app := λ B, coprod_comparison F A B,
naturality' := λ B B' f, by simp [coprod_comparison_natural] }
@[reassoc]
lemma map_inl_inv_coprod_comparison [is_iso (coprod_comparison F A B)] :
F.map coprod.inl ≫ inv (coprod_comparison F A B) = coprod.inl :=
by simp [is_iso.inv_comp_eq]
@[reassoc]
lemma map_inr_inv_coprod_comparison [is_iso (coprod_comparison F A B)] :
F.map coprod.inr ≫ inv (coprod_comparison F A B) = coprod.inr :=
by simp [is_iso.inv_comp_eq]
/-- If the coproduct comparison morphism is an iso, its inverse is natural. -/
@[reassoc]
lemma coprod_comparison_inv_natural (f : A ⟶ A') (g : B ⟶ B')
[is_iso (coprod_comparison F A B)] [is_iso (coprod_comparison F A' B')] :
inv (coprod_comparison F A B) ≫ coprod.map (F.map f) (F.map g) =
F.map (coprod.map f g) ≫ inv (coprod_comparison F A' B') :=
by rw [is_iso.eq_comp_inv, category.assoc, is_iso.inv_comp_eq, coprod_comparison_natural]
/--
The natural isomorphism `FA ⨿ F- ≅ F(A ⨿ -)`, provided each `coprod_comparison F A B` is an
isomorphism (as `B` changes).
-/
@[simps {rhs_md := semireducible}]
def coprod_comparison_nat_iso [has_binary_coproducts C] [has_binary_coproducts D]
(A : C) [∀ B, is_iso (coprod_comparison F A B)] :
F ⋙ coprod.functor.obj (F.obj A) ≅ coprod.functor.obj A ⋙ F :=
{ hom := coprod_comparison_nat_trans F A
..(@as_iso _ _ _ _ _ (nat_iso.is_iso_of_is_iso_app ⟨_, _⟩)) }
end coprod_comparison
end category_theory.limits
open category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `over.coprod`. -/
@[simps]
def over.coprod_obj [has_binary_coproducts C] {A : C} : over A → over A ⥤ over A := λ f,
{ obj := λ g, over.mk (coprod.desc f.hom g.hom),
map := λ g₁ g₂ k, over.hom_mk (coprod.map (𝟙 _) k.left) }
/-- A category with binary coproducts has a functorial `sup` operation on over categories. -/
@[simps]
def over.coprod [has_binary_coproducts C] {A : C} : over A ⥤ over A ⥤ over A :=
{ obj := λ f, over.coprod_obj f,
map := λ f₁ f₂ k,
{ app := λ g, over.hom_mk (coprod.map k.left (𝟙 _))
(by { dsimp, rw [coprod.map_desc, category.id_comp, over.w k] }),
naturality' := λ f g k, by ext; { dsimp, simp, }, },
map_id' := λ X, by ext; { dsimp, simp, },
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g, by ext; { dsimp, simp, }, }.
end category_theory
|
28b1be7a69e936ac690393364847a10a6fcea9fa | cfef816283af58a9ea4678b69595e86562fd4c6a | /src/scone/edge.lean | 08baea02408e99e4db666fc6f76edbd3bae752c6 | [] | no_license | rwbarton/scone | 6fc5bee6766c170d2edeefaf608ee32d665c7c77 | 6f3d35f7a3bed772475ff7954875b9ee7554aae3 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,462,177,915 | 1,603,245,162,000 | 1,603,245,162,000 | 305,762,158 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,804 | lean | import data.equiv.basic
import tactic.binder_matching
import scone.deq
namespace scone
universes v w u u'
/-
Packed contexts
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In order to directly represent a context by a Lean type we would need induction-recursion:
simultaneously define contexts and type families in those contexts.
There might be a way to define these types in Lean anyways,
but for now we use the following mechanism of "packed contexts"
to represent a context as a single Lean type of a specific form
(which is visible only on the `meta` level).
A context `Γ` is represented as a type `⟦Γ⟧` which we call a "packed context":
* the empty context `•` is represented by the type `⟦•⟧ = unit`;
* the extended context `Γ, x : α` (where `Γ ⊢ α type`)
is represented by the type `Σ (i : ⟦Γ⟧), α i`, where in turn
the open type `α` is represented as a function from `⟦Γ⟧` to `Type`.
In the Lean code we write just `Γ` for the packed context `⟦Γ⟧`.
-/
/-- Extra data associated to the judgment `⊢ Γ ctx`. -/
structure edge_ctx (Γ : Sort u) :=
(v : Γ → Type v)
(e : Π {i₀ i₁ : Γ}, v i₀ → v i₁ → Type w)
(refl : Π {i} (a : v i), e a a)
/-- Extra data associated to the judgment `Γ ⊢ X type`.
Here the open type `X` is represented as a Type-valued function on
the packed context `⟦Γ⟧`, which in Lean we write as simply `Γ`,
as described above. -/
structure edge_ctx_ty {Γ : Sort*} (EΓ : edge_ctx Γ) (X : Γ → Sort u) :=
(v : Π {i : Γ}, EΓ.v i → X i → Type v)
(e : Π {i₀ i₁ : Γ} {γ₀ : EΓ.v i₀} {γ₁ : EΓ.v i₁}
{x₀ : X i₀} {x₁ : X i₁}, EΓ.e γ₀ γ₁ → v γ₀ x₀ → v γ₁ x₁ → Type w)
(refl : Π {i : Γ} {γ : EΓ.v i} {x : X i} (a : v γ x), e (EΓ.refl γ) a a)
abbreviation edge_ctx_ty.v' {Γ : Sort*} {EΓ : edge_ctx Γ} {X : Γ → Sort*} (EX : edge_ctx_ty EΓ X)
(i : Γ) (a : EΓ.v i) (x : X i) : Type* :=
EX.v a x
abbreviation edge_ctx_ty.e' {Γ : Sort*} {EΓ : edge_ctx Γ} {X : Γ → Sort*} (EX : edge_ctx_ty EΓ X)
(i₀ i₁ : Γ) {γ₀ : EΓ.v i₀} {γ₁ : EΓ.v i₁} {x₀ : X i₀} {x₁ : X i₁} : EΓ.e γ₀ γ₁ → EX.v γ₀ x₀ → EX.v γ₁ x₁ → Type* :=
λ e, EX.e e
/-- Extra data associated to the judgment `Γ ⊢ t : X`.
Both `X` and `t` are represented as functions on the packed context `⟦Γ⟧`. -/
structure edge_ctx_tm {Γ : Sort*} (EΓ : edge_ctx Γ) {X : Γ → Sort*} (EX : edge_ctx_ty EΓ X)
(t : Π i, X i) :=
(v : Π {i : Γ} (a : EΓ.v i), EX.v a (t i))
(e : Π {i₀ i₁ : Γ} {a₀ : EΓ.v i₀} {a₁ : EΓ.v i₁} (e : EΓ.e a₀ a₁), EX.e e (v a₀) (v a₁))
(refl : Π {i : Γ} (a : EΓ.v i), e (EΓ.refl a) = EX.refl (v a))
/-- Any context can be given the "discrete" `edge_ctx` structure. -/
def discrete_edge_ctx (Γ : Sort u) : edge_ctx Γ :=
{ v := λ _, unit,
e := λ i₀ i₁ _ _, plift (i₀ = i₁),
refl := λ i _, ⟨rfl⟩ }
/-- The extra data associated to the empty context. -/
def unit_edge_ctx : edge_ctx unit :=
discrete_edge_ctx unit
/-- Any type family can be given the "discrete" `edge_ctx_ty` structure
over the discrete `edge_ctx` structure on the index type.
This is appropriate for all types whose definition does not use `Type`. -/
def discrete_edge_ctx_ty {Γ : Sort*} (X : Γ → Sort u) :
edge_ctx_ty (discrete_edge_ctx Γ) X :=
{ v := λ _ _ _, unit,
e := λ i₀ i₁ _ _ x₀ x₁ r _ _, plift (x₀ =[r.down] x₁),
refl := λ i _ x _, ⟨deq.refl x⟩ }
/-- Extra data corresponding to the "context extension" formation rule
⊢ Γ ctx Γ ⊢ α type
----------------------
⊢ Γ, x : α ctx
-/
def edge_ctx.extend {Γ : Sort*} (EΓ : edge_ctx Γ) {A : Γ → Sort*} (EA : edge_ctx_ty EΓ A) :
edge_ctx (Σ γ, A γ) :=
{ v := λ p, Σ (i : EΓ.v p.1), EA.v i p.2,
e := λ p₀ p₁ q₀ q₁, Σ (j : EΓ.e q₀.1 q₁.1), EA.e j q₀.2 q₁.2,
refl := λ p q, ⟨EΓ.refl q.1, EA.refl q.2⟩ }
/-- Extra data corresponding to the "weakening" structural rule
⊢ Γ ctx Γ ⊢ α type Γ ⊢ β type
-----------------------------------
Γ, x : α ⊢ β type
-/
def edge_ctx_ty.extend {Γ : Sort*} {EΓ : edge_ctx Γ} {A : Γ → Sort*} (EA : edge_ctx_ty EΓ A)
{B : Γ → Sort*} (EB : edge_ctx_ty EΓ B) : edge_ctx_ty (EΓ.extend EA) (λ p, B p.1) :=
{ v := λ p q, EB.v q.1,
e := λ p₀ p₁ q₀ q₁ x₀ x₁ j, EB.e j.1,
refl := λ p q x a, EB.refl a }
/-- Implementation: A vertex of `Π A, B` over a value `f`
and above a vertex `x` of `Γ` over a value `i : Γ`. -/
structure pi_edge_v {Γ : Sort*} (EΓ : edge_ctx Γ)
{A : Γ → Sort*} (EA : edge_ctx_ty EΓ A)
{B : Π i, A i → Sort*}
(EB : edge_ctx_ty (EΓ.extend EA) (λ p, B p.1 p.2))
(i : Γ) (x : EΓ.v i) (f : Π (a : A i), B i a) :=
(fv : Π (a : A i) (w : EA.v x a), EB.v' ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨x, w⟩ (f a))
(fe : Π (a₀ a₁ : A i) (w₀ : EA.v x a₀) (w₁ : EA.v x a₁) (e : EA.e (EΓ.refl x) w₀ w₁),
EB.e (by exact ⟨EΓ.refl x, e⟩) (fv a₀ w₀) (fv a₁ w₁))
-- TODO: refl
/-- Extra data corresponding to the Pi introduction rule
⊢ Γ ctx Γ ⊢ α type Γ, a : α ⊢ β type
------------------------------------------
Γ ⊢ Π (a : α), β type
We represent the type family `β` as a function of two arguments:
the packed context `i : ⟦Γ⟧` and the bound variable `a : α`. -/
def pi_edge_ctx_ty {Γ : Sort*} (EΓ : edge_ctx Γ)
{A : Γ → Sort*} (EA : edge_ctx_ty EΓ A)
{B : Π i, A i → Sort*}
(EB : edge_ctx_ty (EΓ.extend EA) (λ p, B p.1 p.2)) :
edge_ctx_ty EΓ (λ i, Π a, B i a) :=
{ v := pi_edge_v EΓ EA EB,
e := λ i₀ i₁ x₀ x₁ f₀ f₁ e F₀ F₁,
Π (a₀ : A i₀) (a₁ : A i₁) (w₀ : EA.v x₀ a₀) (w₁ : EA.v x₁ a₁) (d : EA.e e w₀ w₁),
EB.e' ⟨i₀, a₀⟩ ⟨i₁, a₁⟩ (by exact ⟨e, d⟩) (F₀.fv a₀ w₀) (F₁.fv a₁ w₁),
refl := λ i a f F, F.fe }
/-- Extra data corresponding to the "var" structural rule
⊢ Γ ctx Γ ⊢ α type
----------------------
Γ, a : α ⊢ a : α
-/
def last_var_ctx_tm {Γ : Sort*} (EΓ : edge_ctx Γ) {A : Γ → Sort*} (EA : edge_ctx_ty EΓ A) :
edge_ctx_tm (EΓ.extend EA) (EA.extend EA) (λ (p : Σ i, A i), p.2) :=
{ v := λ i p, p.2,
e := λ i₀ i₁ p₀ p₁ e, e.2,
refl := λ i p, rfl }
/-- Extra data corresponding to a type in an empty context: `• ⊢ α type`. -/
def edge_ty (A : Sort u) : Sort* := edge_ctx_ty unit_edge_ctx (λ _, A)
-- TODO: more concise constructor for `edge_ty`, not involving a zillion underscores?
def edge_ty.v_ {A : Sort*} (EA : edge_ty A) : A → Sort* := EA.v' () ()
def edge_ty.e_ {A : Sort*} (EA : edge_ty A) {a₀ a₁ : A} : EA.v_ a₀ → EA.v_ a₁ → Sort* := EA.e ⟨rfl⟩
-- TODO: similar `edge_tm` type for closed terms.
-- This definition classifies only *discrete* types!
def discrete_type_edge_ty : edge_ty Type :=
{ v := λ _ _ _, unit,
e := λ _ _ _ _ X Y _ _ _, X ≃ Y,
refl := λ _ _ X _, equiv.refl X }
structure edge_ty_iso {X Y : Sort*} (EX : edge_ty X) (EY : edge_ty Y) :=
(φ : X ≃ Y)
(φv : Π x, EX.v_ x ≃ EY.v_ (φ x))
(φe : Π x₀ x₁ (w₀ : EX.v_ x₀) (w₁ : EX.v_ x₁),
EX.e_ w₀ w₁ ≃ EY.e_ (φv x₀ w₀) (φv x₁ w₁))
-- TODO: refl
/-- Extra data for `• ⊢ Type type`.
Object classifier, displayed over the object classifier `Type` of Set. -/
def type_edge_ty : edge_ty Type :=
{ v := λ _ _ X, edge_ty X,
e := λ _ _ _ _ X Y _ EX EY, edge_ty_iso EX EY,
refl := λ _ _ X EX,
{ φ := equiv.refl X,
φv := λ x, equiv.refl _,
φe := λ x₀ x₁ w₀ w₁, equiv.refl _ } }
def prop_edge_ty : edge_ty Prop :=
{ v := λ _ _ _, unit,
e := λ _ _ _ _ p q _ _ _, plift (p ↔ q),
refl := λ _ _ p _, ⟨iff.refl p⟩ }
/-- Weakening rule for constants:
• ⊢ α type
------------
Γ ⊢ α type
-/
def gen_edge_ty {A : Sort*} (EA : edge_ty A) {Γ : Sort*} {EΓ : edge_ctx Γ} : edge_ctx_ty EΓ (λ _, A) :=
{ v := λ i _ a, EA.v_ a,
e := λ i₀ i₁ _ _ a₀ a₁ _ x₀ x₁, EA.e_ x₀ x₁,
refl := λ i _ a x, EA.refl x }
/-- Extra data corresponding to Russell-style universes:
⊢ Γ ctx Γ ⊢ α : Type
------------------------
Γ ⊢ α type
-/
def univ_ctx_ty {Γ : Sort*} (EΓ : edge_ctx Γ) {A : Γ → Type} (EA : edge_ctx_tm EΓ (gen_edge_ty type_edge_ty) A) :
edge_ctx_ty EΓ A :=
{ v := λ i x a, (EA.v x).v_ a,
-- We make a choice of "transport direction" here; does it matter?
e := λ i₀ i₁ x₀ x₁ a₀ a₁ e v₀ v₁, (EA.v x₁).e_ ((EA.e e).φv _ v₀) v₁,
-- Note: This might not be a proof! Is that okay?
-- Instead, we should transport `(EA.v x).refl _` along `EA.refl` somehow, I guess?
refl := λ i x a v, by { rw EA.refl, exact (EA.v x).refl _ } }
end scone
|
204a62d156813b8011d2ce8dac8236eea2993cf7 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /library/init/meta/expr.lean | 96a67c575588ca91e1933a0db8d96db5bc1bda83 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,534 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.meta.level init.category.monad init.meta.rb_map
universes u v
structure pos :=
(line : nat)
(column : nat)
instance : decidable_eq pos
| ⟨l₁, c₁⟩ ⟨l₂, c₂⟩ := if h₁ : l₁ = l₂ then
if h₂ : c₁ = c₂ then is_true (eq.rec_on h₁ (eq.rec_on h₂ rfl))
else is_false (λ contra, pos.no_confusion contra (λ e₁ e₂, absurd e₂ h₂))
else is_false (λ contra, pos.no_confusion contra (λ e₁ e₂, absurd e₁ h₁))
meta instance : has_to_format pos :=
⟨λ ⟨l, c⟩, "⟨" ++ l ++ ", " ++ c ++ "⟩"⟩
inductive binder_info
| default | implicit | strict_implicit | inst_implicit | aux_decl
instance : has_repr binder_info :=
⟨λ bi, match bi with
| binder_info.default := "default"
| binder_info.implicit := "implicit"
| binder_info.strict_implicit := "strict_implicit"
| binder_info.inst_implicit := "inst_implicit"
| binder_info.aux_decl := "aux_decl"
end⟩
meta constant macro_def : Type
/-- Reflect a C++ expr object. The VM replaces it with the C++ implementation. -/
meta inductive expr (elaborated : bool := tt)
| var {} : nat → expr
| sort {} : level → expr
| const {} : name → list level → expr
| mvar : name → name → expr → expr
| local_const : name → name → binder_info → expr → expr
| app : expr → expr → expr
| lam : name → binder_info → expr → expr → expr
| pi : name → binder_info → expr → expr → expr
| elet : name → expr → expr → expr → expr
| macro : macro_def → list expr → expr
variable {elab : bool}
meta instance : inhabited expr :=
⟨expr.sort level.zero⟩
meta constant expr.macro_def_name (d : macro_def) : name
meta def expr.mk_var (n : nat) : expr :=
expr.var n
/- Expressions can be annotated using the annotation macro. -/
meta constant expr.is_annotation : expr elab → option (name × expr elab)
meta def expr.erase_annotations : expr elab → expr elab
| e :=
match e.is_annotation with
| some (_, a) := expr.erase_annotations a
| none := e
end
/-- Compares expressions, including binder names. -/
meta constant expr.has_decidable_eq : decidable_eq expr
attribute [instance] expr.has_decidable_eq
/-- Compares expressions while ignoring binder names. -/
meta constant expr.alpha_eqv : expr → expr → bool
notation a ` =ₐ `:50 b:50 := expr.alpha_eqv a b = bool.tt
protected meta constant expr.to_string : expr elab → string
meta instance : has_to_string (expr elab) := ⟨expr.to_string⟩
meta instance : has_to_format (expr elab) := ⟨λ e, e.to_string⟩
/- Coercion for letting users write (f a) instead of (expr.app f a) -/
meta instance : has_coe_to_fun (expr elab) :=
{ F := λ e, expr elab → expr elab, coe := λ e, expr.app e }
meta constant expr.hash : expr → nat
/-- Compares expressions, ignoring binder names, and sorting by hash. -/
meta constant expr.lt : expr → expr → bool
/-- Compares expressions, ignoring binder names. -/
meta constant expr.lex_lt : expr → expr → bool
/-- Compares expressions, ignoring binder names, and sorting by hash. -/
meta def expr.cmp (a b : expr) : ordering :=
if expr.lt a b then ordering.lt
else if a =ₐ b then ordering.eq
else ordering.gt
meta constant expr.fold {α : Type} : expr → α → (expr → nat → α → α) → α
meta constant expr.replace : expr → (expr → nat → option expr) → expr
meta constant expr.abstract_local : expr → name → expr
meta constant expr.abstract_locals : expr → list name → expr
meta def expr.abstract : expr → expr → expr
| e (expr.local_const n m bi t) := e.abstract_local n
| e _ := e
meta constant expr.instantiate_univ_params : expr → list (name × level) → expr
meta constant expr.instantiate_var : expr → expr → expr
meta constant expr.instantiate_vars : expr → list expr → expr
protected meta constant expr.subst : expr elab → expr elab → expr elab
/-- `has_var e` returns true iff e has free variables. -/
meta constant expr.has_var : expr → bool
meta constant expr.has_var_idx : expr → nat → bool
meta constant expr.has_local : expr → bool
meta constant expr.has_meta_var : expr → bool
/-- `lower_vars e s d` lowers the free variables >= s in `e` by `d`. That is, a free variable `var i` s.t.
`i >= s` is mapped to `var (i-d)`. -/
meta constant expr.lower_vars : expr → nat → nat → expr
/-- Lifts free variables. See `expr.lower_vars` for details. -/
meta constant expr.lift_vars : expr → nat → nat → expr
protected meta constant expr.pos : expr elab → option pos
/-- `copy_pos_info src tgt` copies position information from `src` to `tgt`. -/
meta constant expr.copy_pos_info : expr → expr → expr
meta constant expr.is_internal_cnstr : expr → option unsigned
meta constant expr.get_nat_value : expr → option nat
meta constant expr.collect_univ_params : expr → list name
/-- `occurs e t` returns `tt` iff `e` occurs in `t` -/
meta constant expr.occurs : expr → expr → bool
meta constant expr.has_local_in : expr → name_set → bool
/-- (reflected a) is a special opaque container for a closed `expr` representing `a`.
It can only be obtained via type class inference, which will use the representation
of `a` in the calling context. Local constants in the representation are replaced
by nested inference of `reflected` instances.
The quotation expression `(a) (outside of patterns) is equivalent to `reflect a`
and thus can be used as an explicit way of inferring an instance of `reflected a`. -/
meta def reflected {α : Sort u} : α → Type :=
λ _, expr
@[inline] meta def reflected.to_expr {α : Sort u} {a : α} : reflected a → expr :=
id
@[inline] meta def reflected.subst {α : Sort v} {β : α → Sort u} {f : Π a : α, β a} {a : α} :
reflected f → reflected a → reflected (f a) :=
expr.subst
meta constant expr.reflect (e : expr elab) : reflected e
meta constant string.reflect (s : string) : reflected s
attribute [class] reflected
attribute [instance] expr.reflect string.reflect
attribute [irreducible] reflected reflected.subst reflected.to_expr
@[inline] meta instance {α : Sort u} (a : α) : has_coe (reflected a) expr :=
⟨reflected.to_expr⟩
meta def reflect {α : Sort u} (a : α) [h : reflected a] : reflected a := h
meta instance {α} (a : α) : has_to_format (reflected a) :=
⟨λ h, to_fmt h.to_expr⟩
namespace expr
open decidable
/-- Compares expressions, ignoring binder names, and sorting by hash. -/
meta instance : has_ordering expr :=
⟨ expr.cmp ⟩
meta def mk_true : expr :=
const `true []
meta def mk_false : expr :=
const `false []
/-- Returns the sorry macro with the given type. -/
meta constant mk_sorry (type : expr) : expr
/-- Checks whether e is sorry, and returns its type. -/
meta constant is_sorry (e : expr) : option expr
meta def instantiate_local (n : name) (s : expr) (e : expr) : expr :=
instantiate_var (abstract_local e n) s
meta def instantiate_locals (s : list (name × expr)) (e : expr) : expr :=
instantiate_vars (abstract_locals e (list.reverse (list.map prod.fst s))) (list.map prod.snd s)
meta def is_var : expr → bool
| (var _) := tt
| _ := ff
meta def app_of_list : expr → list expr → expr
| f [] := f
| f (p::ps) := app_of_list (f p) ps
meta def is_app : expr → bool
| (app f a) := tt
| e := ff
meta def app_fn : expr → expr
| (app f a) := f
| a := a
meta def app_arg : expr → expr
| (app f a) := a
| a := a
meta def get_app_fn : expr elab → expr elab
| (app f a) := get_app_fn f
| a := a
meta def get_app_num_args : expr → nat
| (app f a) := get_app_num_args f + 1
| e := 0
meta def get_app_args_aux : list expr → expr → list expr
| r (app f a) := get_app_args_aux (a::r) f
| r e := r
meta def get_app_args : expr → list expr :=
get_app_args_aux []
meta def mk_app : expr → list expr → expr
| e [] := e
| e (x::xs) := mk_app (e x) xs
meta def ith_arg_aux : expr → nat → expr
| (app f a) 0 := a
| (app f a) (n+1) := ith_arg_aux f n
| e _ := e
meta def ith_arg (e : expr) (i : nat) : expr :=
ith_arg_aux e (get_app_num_args e - i - 1)
meta def const_name : expr elab → name
| (const n ls) := n
| e := name.anonymous
meta def is_constant : expr elab → bool
| (const n ls) := tt
| e := ff
meta def is_local_constant : expr → bool
| (local_const n m bi t) := tt
| e := ff
meta def local_uniq_name : expr → name
| (local_const n m bi t) := n
| e := name.anonymous
meta def local_pp_name : expr elab → name
| (local_const x n bi t) := n
| e := name.anonymous
meta def local_type : expr elab → expr elab
| (local_const _ _ _ t) := t
| e := e
meta def is_aux_decl : expr → bool
| (local_const _ _ binder_info.aux_decl _) := tt
| _ := ff
meta def is_constant_of : expr → name → bool
| (const n₁ ls) n₂ := n₁ = n₂
| e n := ff
meta def is_app_of (e : expr) (n : name) : bool :=
is_constant_of (get_app_fn e) n
meta def is_napp_of (e : expr) (c : name) (n : nat) : bool :=
is_app_of e c ∧ get_app_num_args e = n
meta def is_false : expr → bool
| `(false) := tt
| _ := ff
meta def is_not : expr → option expr
| `(not %%a) := some a
| `(%%a → false) := some a
| e := none
meta def is_and : expr → option (expr × expr)
| `(and %%α %%β) := some (α, β)
| _ := none
meta def is_or : expr → option (expr × expr)
| `(or %%α %%β) := some (α, β)
| _ := none
meta def is_iff : expr → option (expr × expr)
| `((%%a : Prop) ↔ %%b) := some (a, b)
| _ := none
meta def is_eq : expr → option (expr × expr)
| `((%%a : %%_) = %%b) := some (a, b)
| _ := none
meta def is_ne : expr → option (expr × expr)
| `((%%a : %%_) ≠ %%b) := some (a, b)
| _ := none
meta def is_bin_arith_app (e : expr) (op : name) : option (expr × expr) :=
if is_napp_of e op 4
then some (app_arg (app_fn e), app_arg e)
else none
meta def is_lt (e : expr) : option (expr × expr) :=
is_bin_arith_app e ``has_lt.lt
meta def is_gt (e : expr) : option (expr × expr) :=
is_bin_arith_app e ``gt
meta def is_le (e : expr) : option (expr × expr) :=
is_bin_arith_app e ``has_le.le
meta def is_ge (e : expr) : option (expr × expr) :=
is_bin_arith_app e ``ge
meta def is_heq : expr → option (expr × expr × expr × expr)
| `(@heq %%α %%a %%β %%b) := some (α, a, β, b)
| _ := none
meta def is_pi : expr → bool
| (pi _ _ _ _) := tt
| e := ff
meta def is_arrow : expr → bool
| (pi _ _ _ b) := bnot (has_var b)
| e := ff
meta def is_let : expr → bool
| (elet _ _ _ _) := tt
| e := ff
meta def binding_name : expr → name
| (pi n _ _ _) := n
| (lam n _ _ _) := n
| e := name.anonymous
meta def binding_info : expr → binder_info
| (pi _ bi _ _) := bi
| (lam _ bi _ _) := bi
| e := binder_info.default
meta def binding_domain : expr → expr
| (pi _ _ d _) := d
| (lam _ _ d _) := d
| e := e
meta def binding_body : expr → expr
| (pi _ _ _ b) := b
| (lam _ _ _ b) := b
| e := e
meta def is_numeral : expr → bool
| `(@has_zero.zero %%α %%s) := tt
| `(@has_one.one %%α %%s) := tt
| `(@bit0 %%α %%s %%v) := is_numeral v
| `(@bit1 %%α %%s₁ %%s₂ %%v) := is_numeral v
| _ := ff
meta def imp (a b : expr) : expr :=
pi `_ binder_info.default a b
meta def lambdas : list expr → expr → expr
| (local_const uniq pp info t :: es) f :=
lam pp info t (abstract_local (lambdas es f) uniq)
| _ f := f
meta def pis : list expr → expr → expr
| (local_const uniq pp info t :: es) f :=
pi pp info t (abstract_local (pis es f) uniq)
| _ f := f
open format
private meta def p := λ xs, paren (format.join (list.intersperse " " xs))
meta def to_raw_fmt : expr elab → format
| (var n) := p ["var", to_fmt n]
| (sort l) := p ["sort", to_fmt l]
| (const n ls) := p ["const", to_fmt n, to_fmt ls]
| (mvar n m t) := p ["mvar", to_fmt n, to_fmt m, to_raw_fmt t]
| (local_const n m bi t) := p ["local_const", to_fmt n, to_fmt m, to_raw_fmt t]
| (app e f) := p ["app", to_raw_fmt e, to_raw_fmt f]
| (lam n bi e t) := p ["lam", to_fmt n, repr bi, to_raw_fmt e, to_raw_fmt t]
| (pi n bi e t) := p ["pi", to_fmt n, repr bi, to_raw_fmt e, to_raw_fmt t]
| (elet n g e f) := p ["elet", to_fmt n, to_raw_fmt g, to_raw_fmt e, to_raw_fmt f]
| (macro d args) := sbracket (format.join (list.intersperse " " ("macro" :: to_fmt (macro_def_name d) :: args.map to_raw_fmt)))
meta def mfold {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [monad m] (e : expr) (a : α) (fn : expr → nat → α → m α) : m α :=
fold e (return a) (λ e n a, a >>= fn e n)
end expr
@[reducible] meta def expr_map (data : Type) := rb_map expr data
namespace expr_map
export rb_map (hiding mk)
meta def mk (data : Type) : expr_map data := rb_map.mk expr data
end expr_map
meta def mk_expr_map {data : Type} : expr_map data :=
expr_map.mk data
@[reducible] meta def expr_set := rb_set expr
meta def mk_expr_set : expr_set := mk_rb_set
|
bad230b306aa8edfde28de6f338c5c496f630a12 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/data/set/finite.lean | 585d047ad993b78bc62099281c5bf5dc458bc544 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,623 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.finset.sort
import data.set.functor
/-!
# Finite sets
This file defines predicates `finite : set α → Prop` and `infinite : set α → Prop` and proves some
basic facts about finite sets.
-/
open set function
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace set
/-- A set is finite if the subtype is a fintype, i.e. there is a
list that enumerates its members. -/
inductive finite (s : set α) : Prop
| intro : fintype s → finite
lemma finite_def {s : set α} : finite s ↔ nonempty (fintype s) := ⟨λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨h⟩, λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨h⟩⟩
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite. -/
def infinite (s : set α) : Prop := ¬ finite s
/-- The subtype corresponding to a finite set is a finite type. Note
that because `finite` isn't a typeclass, this will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
noncomputable def finite.fintype {s : set α} (h : finite s) : fintype s :=
classical.choice $ finite_def.1 h
/-- Get a finset from a finite set -/
noncomputable def finite.to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) : finset α :=
@set.to_finset _ _ h.fintype
@[simp] lemma not_infinite {s : set α} : ¬ s.infinite ↔ s.finite :=
by simp [infinite]
/-- See also `fintype_or_infinite`. -/
lemma finite_or_infinite {s : set α} : s.finite ∨ s.infinite := em _
@[simp] theorem finite.mem_to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) {a : α} : a ∈ h.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_to_finset _ _ h.fintype _
@[simp] theorem finite.to_finset.nonempty {s : set α} (h : finite s) :
h.to_finset.nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
show (∃ x, x ∈ h.to_finset) ↔ (∃ x, x ∈ s),
from exists_congr (λ _, h.mem_to_finset)
@[simp] lemma finite.coe_to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) : ↑h.to_finset = s :=
@set.coe_to_finset _ s h.fintype
@[simp] lemma finite.coe_sort_to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) :
(h.to_finset : Type*) = s :=
by rw [← finset.coe_sort_coe _, h.coe_to_finset]
@[simp] lemma finite_empty_to_finset (h : finite (∅ : set α)) : h.to_finset = ∅ :=
by rw [← finset.coe_inj, h.coe_to_finset, finset.coe_empty]
@[simp] lemma finite.to_finset_inj {s t : set α} {hs : finite s} {ht : finite t} :
hs.to_finset = ht.to_finset ↔ s = t :=
by simp [←finset.coe_inj]
lemma subset_to_finset_iff {s : finset α} {t : set α} (ht : finite t) :
s ⊆ ht.to_finset ↔ ↑s ⊆ t :=
by rw [← finset.coe_subset, ht.coe_to_finset]
@[simp] lemma finite_to_finset_eq_empty_iff {s : set α} {h : finite s} :
h.to_finset = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
by simp [←finset.coe_inj]
theorem finite.exists_finset {s : set α} : finite s →
∃ s' : finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s
| ⟨h⟩ := by exactI ⟨to_finset s, λ _, mem_to_finset⟩
theorem finite.exists_finset_coe {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
∃ s' : finset α, ↑s' = s :=
⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset⟩
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : can_lift (set α) (finset α) :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := finite,
prf := λ s hs, hs.exists_finset_coe }
theorem finite_mem_finset (s : finset α) : finite {a | a ∈ s} :=
⟨fintype.of_finset s (λ _, iff.rfl)⟩
theorem finite.of_fintype [fintype α] (s : set α) : finite s :=
by classical; exact ⟨set_fintype s⟩
theorem exists_finite_iff_finset {p : set α → Prop} :
(∃ s, finite s ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s : finset α, p ↑s :=
⟨λ ⟨s, hs, hps⟩, ⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset.symm ▸ hps⟩,
λ ⟨s, hs⟩, ⟨↑s, finite_mem_finset s, hs⟩⟩
lemma finite.fin_embedding {s : set α} (h : finite s) : ∃ (n : ℕ) (f : fin n ↪ α), range f = s :=
⟨_, (fintype.equiv_fin (h.to_finset : set α)).symm.as_embedding, by simp⟩
lemma finite.fin_param {s : set α} (h : finite s) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (f : fin n → α), injective f ∧ range f = s :=
let ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := h.fin_embedding in ⟨n, f, f.injective, hf⟩
/-- Membership of a subset of a finite type is decidable.
Using this as an instance leads to potential loops with `subtype.fintype` under certain decidability
assumptions, so it should only be declared a local instance. -/
def decidable_mem_of_fintype [decidable_eq α] (s : set α) [fintype s] (a) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ mem_to_finset
instance fintype_empty : fintype (∅ : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ∅ $ by simp
theorem empty_card : fintype.card (∅ : set α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_card' {h : fintype.{u} (∅ : set α)} :
@fintype.card (∅ : set α) h = 0 :=
eq.trans (by congr) empty_card
@[simp] theorem finite_empty : @finite α ∅ := ⟨set.fintype_empty⟩
instance finite.inhabited : inhabited {s : set α // finite s} := ⟨⟨∅, finite_empty⟩⟩
/-- A `fintype` structure on `insert a s`. -/
def fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨a ::ₘ s.to_finset.1,
multiset.nodup_cons_of_nodup (by simp [h]) s.to_finset.2⟩ $ by simp
theorem card_fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
@fintype.card _ (fintype_insert' s h) = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw [fintype_insert', fintype.card_of_finset];
simp [finset.card, to_finset]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_insert {a : α} (s : set α)
[fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) {d : fintype.{u} (insert a s : set α)} :
@fintype.card _ d = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw ← card_fintype_insert' s h; congr
lemma card_image_of_inj_on {s : set α} [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
calc fintype.card (f '' s) = (s.to_finset.image f).card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... = s.to_finset.card : finset.card_image_of_inj_on
(λ x hx y hy hxy, H x (mem_to_finset.1 hx) y (mem_to_finset.1 hy) hxy)
... = fintype.card s : (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ a, mem_to_finset)).symm
lemma card_image_of_injective (s : set α) [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : function.injective f) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ _ _ _ _ h, H h
section
local attribute [instance] decidable_mem_of_fintype
instance fintype_insert [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : set α) [fintype s] :
fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then by rwa [insert_eq, union_eq_self_of_subset_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 h)]
else fintype_insert' _ h
end
@[simp] theorem finite.insert (a : α) {s : set α} : finite s → finite (insert a s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_insert _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ h⟩
lemma to_finset_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
(hs.insert a).to_finset = insert a hs.to_finset :=
finset.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma insert_to_finset [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : set α} [fintype s] :
(insert a s).to_finset = insert a s.to_finset :=
by simp [finset.ext_iff, mem_insert_iff]
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.induction_on {C : set α → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅) (H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → finite s → C s → C (insert a s)) : C s :=
let ⟨t⟩ := h in by exactI
match s.to_finset, @mem_to_finset _ s _ with
| ⟨l, nd⟩, al := begin
change ∀ a, a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ s at al,
clear _let_match _match t h, revert s nd al,
refine multiset.induction_on l _ (λ a l IH, _); intros s nd al,
{ rw show s = ∅, from eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (by simpa using al),
exact H0 },
{ rw ← show insert a {x | x ∈ l} = s, from set.ext (by simpa using al),
cases multiset.nodup_cons.1 nd with m nd',
refine H1 _ ⟨finset.subtype.fintype ⟨l, nd'⟩⟩ (IH nd' (λ _, iff.rfl)),
exact m }
end
end
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.dinduction_on {C : ∀s:set α, finite s → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅ finite_empty)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → ∀ h : finite s, C s h → C (insert a s) (h.insert a)) :
C s h :=
have ∀ h : finite s, C s h,
from finite.induction_on h (λ h, H0) (λ a s has hs ih h, H1 has hs (ih _)),
this h
instance fintype_singleton (a : α) : fintype ({a} : set α) :=
unique.fintype
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) :
fintype.card ({a} : set α) = 1 :=
fintype.card_of_subsingleton _
@[simp] theorem finite_singleton (a : α) : finite ({a} : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_singleton _⟩
lemma subsingleton.finite {s : set α} (h : s.subsingleton) : finite s :=
h.induction_on finite_empty finite_singleton
lemma to_finset_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : set α).to_finset = {a} := rfl
lemma finite_is_top (α : Type*) [partial_order α] : finite {x : α | is_top x} :=
(subsingleton_is_top α).finite
lemma finite_is_bot (α : Type*) [partial_order α] : finite {x : α | is_bot x} :=
(subsingleton_is_bot α).finite
instance fintype_pure : ∀ a : α, fintype (pure a : set α) :=
set.fintype_singleton
theorem finite_pure (a : α) : finite (pure a : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_pure a⟩
instance fintype_univ [fintype α] : fintype (@univ α) :=
fintype.of_equiv α $ (equiv.set.univ α).symm
theorem finite_univ [fintype α] : finite (@univ α) := ⟨set.fintype_univ⟩
/-- If `(set.univ : set α)` is finite then `α` is a finite type. -/
noncomputable def fintype_of_univ_finite (H : (univ : set α).finite ) :
fintype α :=
@fintype.of_equiv _ (univ : set α) H.fintype (equiv.set.univ _)
lemma univ_finite_iff_nonempty_fintype :
(univ : set α).finite ↔ nonempty (fintype α) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, exact ⟨fintype_of_univ_finite h⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨_i⟩, exactI finite_univ }
end
theorem infinite_univ_iff : (@univ α).infinite ↔ _root_.infinite α :=
⟨λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ $ @finite_univ α h₂⟩, λ ⟨h₁⟩ h₂, h₁ (fintype_of_univ_finite h₂)⟩
theorem infinite_univ [h : _root_.infinite α] : infinite (@univ α) :=
infinite_univ_iff.2 h
theorem infinite_coe_iff {s : set α} : _root_.infinite s ↔ infinite s :=
⟨λ ⟨h₁⟩ h₂, h₁ h₂.fintype, λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ ⟨h₂⟩⟩⟩
theorem infinite.to_subtype {s : set α} (h : infinite s) : _root_.infinite s :=
infinite_coe_iff.2 h
/-- Embedding of `ℕ` into an infinite set. -/
noncomputable def infinite.nat_embedding (s : set α) (h : infinite s) : ℕ ↪ s :=
by { haveI := h.to_subtype, exact infinite.nat_embedding s }
lemma infinite.exists_subset_card_eq {s : set α} (hs : infinite s) (n : ℕ) :
∃ t : finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.card = n :=
⟨((finset.range n).map (hs.nat_embedding _)).map (embedding.subtype _), by simp⟩
lemma infinite.nonempty {s : set α} (h : s.infinite) : s.nonempty :=
let a := infinite.nat_embedding s h 37 in ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
instance fintype_union [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t] :
fintype (s ∪ t : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset) $ by simp
theorem finite.union {s t : set α} : finite s → finite t → finite (s ∪ t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ hs ht⟩
lemma finite.sup {s t : set α} : finite s → finite t → finite (s ⊔ t) := finite.union
lemma infinite_of_finite_compl [_root_.infinite α] {s : set α}
(hs : sᶜ.finite) : s.infinite :=
λ h, set.infinite_univ (by simpa using hs.union h)
lemma finite.infinite_compl [_root_.infinite α] {s : set α}
(hs : s.finite) : sᶜ.infinite :=
λ h, set.infinite_univ (by simpa using hs.union h)
instance fintype_sep (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) [fintype s] [decidable_pred p] :
fintype ({a ∈ s | p a} : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.filter p) $ by simp
instance fintype_inter (s t : set α) [fintype s] [decidable_pred (∈ t)] : fintype (s ∩ t : set α) :=
set.fintype_sep s t
/-- A `fintype` structure on a set defines a `fintype` structure on its subset. -/
def fintype_subset (s : set α) {t : set α} [fintype s] [decidable_pred (∈ t)] (h : t ⊆ s) :
fintype t :=
by rw ← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h; apply_instance
theorem finite.subset {s : set α} : finite s → ∀ {t : set α}, t ⊆ s → finite t
| ⟨hs⟩ t h := ⟨@set.fintype_subset _ _ _ hs (classical.dec_pred t) h⟩
@[simp] lemma finite_union {s t : set α} : finite (s ∪ t) ↔ finite s ∧ finite t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.subset (subset_union_left _ _), h.subset (subset_union_right _ _)⟩,
λ ⟨hs, ht⟩, hs.union ht⟩
lemma finite.of_diff {s t : set α} (hd : finite (s \ t)) (ht : finite t) : finite s :=
(hd.union ht).subset $ subset_diff_union _ _
theorem finite.inter_of_left {s : set α} (h : finite s) (t : set α) : finite (s ∩ t) :=
h.subset (inter_subset_left _ _)
theorem finite.inter_of_right {s : set α} (h : finite s) (t : set α) : finite (t ∩ s) :=
h.subset (inter_subset_right _ _)
theorem finite.inf_of_left {s : set α} (h : finite s) (t : set α) : finite (s ⊓ t) :=
h.inter_of_left t
theorem finite.inf_of_right {s : set α} (h : finite s) (t : set α) : finite (t ⊓ s) :=
h.inter_of_right t
lemma finite.sInter {α : Type*} {s : set (set α)} {t : set α} (ht : t ∈ s)
(hf : t.finite) : (⋂₀s).finite :=
hf.subset (sInter_subset_of_mem ht)
protected theorem infinite.mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : infinite s → infinite t :=
mt (λ ht, ht.subset h)
lemma infinite.diff {s t : set α} (hs : s.infinite) (ht : t.finite) :
(s \ t).infinite :=
λ h, hs $ h.of_diff ht
@[simp] lemma infinite_union {s t : set α} : infinite (s ∪ t) ↔ infinite s ∨ infinite t :=
by simp only [infinite, finite_union, not_and_distrib]
instance fintype_image [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s] : fintype (f '' s) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.image f) $ by simp
instance fintype_range [decidable_eq α] (f : ι → α) [fintype (plift ι)] :
fintype (range f) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.image $ f ∘ plift.down) $
by simp [(@equiv.plift ι).exists_congr_left]
theorem finite_range (f : ι → α) [fintype (plift ι)] : finite (range f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact ⟨by apply_instance⟩
theorem finite.image {s : set α} (f : α → β) : finite s → finite (f '' s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_image _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ _ h⟩
theorem infinite_of_infinite_image (f : α → β) {s : set α} (hs : (f '' s).infinite) :
s.infinite :=
mt (finite.image f) hs
lemma finite.dependent_image {s : set α} (hs : finite s) (F : Π i ∈ s, β) :
finite {y : β | ∃ x (hx : x ∈ s), y = F x hx} :=
begin
letI : fintype s := hs.fintype,
convert finite_range (λ x : s, F x x.2),
simp only [set_coe.exists, subtype.coe_mk, eq_comm],
end
theorem finite.of_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β} (h : finite (f ⁻¹' s)) (hf : surjective f) :
finite s :=
hf.image_preimage s ▸ h.image _
instance fintype_map {α β} [decidable_eq β] :
∀ (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s], fintype (f <$> s) := set.fintype_image
theorem finite.map {α β} {s : set α} :
∀ (f : α → β), finite s → finite (f <$> s) := finite.image
/-- If a function `f` has a partial inverse and sends a set `s` to a set with `[fintype]` instance,
then `s` has a `fintype` structure as well. -/
def fintype_of_fintype_image (s : set α)
{f : α → β} {g} (I : is_partial_inv f g) [fintype (f '' s)] : fintype s :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨_, @multiset.nodup_filter_map β α g _
(@injective_of_partial_inv_right _ _ f g I) (f '' s).to_finset.2⟩ $ λ a,
begin
suffices : (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s,
by simpa [exists_and_distrib_left.symm, and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc],
rw exists_swap,
suffices : (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s, {simpa [and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc]},
simp [I _, (injective_of_partial_inv I).eq_iff]
end
theorem finite_of_finite_image {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : set.inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) → finite s | ⟨h⟩ :=
⟨@fintype.of_injective _ _ h (λ a : s, ⟨f a.1, mem_image_of_mem f a.2⟩) $
λ a b eq, subtype.eq $ hi a.2 b.2 $ subtype.ext_iff_val.1 eq⟩
theorem finite_image_iff {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) ↔ finite s :=
⟨finite_of_finite_image hi, finite.image _⟩
theorem infinite_image_iff {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : inj_on f s) :
infinite (f '' s) ↔ infinite s :=
not_congr $ finite_image_iff hi
theorem infinite_of_inj_on_maps_to {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β}
(hi : inj_on f s) (hm : maps_to f s t) (hs : infinite s) : infinite t :=
((infinite_image_iff hi).2 hs).mono (maps_to'.mp hm)
theorem infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_maps_to {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β}
(hs : infinite s) (hf : maps_to f s t) (ht : finite t) :
∃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y :=
begin
contrapose! ht,
exact infinite_of_inj_on_maps_to (λ x hx y hy, not_imp_not.1 (ht x hx y hy)) hf hs
end
theorem infinite.exists_lt_map_eq_of_maps_to [linear_order α] {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β}
(hs : infinite s) (hf : maps_to f s t) (ht : finite t) :
∃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x < y ∧ f x = f y :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy, hf⟩ := hs.exists_ne_map_eq_of_maps_to hf ht
in hxy.lt_or_lt.elim (λ hxy, ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy, hf⟩) (λ hyx, ⟨y, hy, x, hx, hyx, hf.symm⟩)
lemma finite.exists_lt_map_eq_of_range_subset [linear_order α] [_root_.infinite α] {t : set β}
{f : α → β} (hf : range f ⊆ t) (ht : finite t) :
∃ a b, a < b ∧ f a = f b :=
begin
rw [range_subset_iff, ←maps_univ_to] at hf,
obtain ⟨a, -, b, -, h⟩ := (@infinite_univ α _).exists_lt_map_eq_of_maps_to hf ht,
exact ⟨a, b, h⟩,
end
theorem infinite_range_of_injective [_root_.infinite α] {f : α → β} (hi : injective f) :
infinite (range f) :=
by { rw [←image_univ, infinite_image_iff (inj_on_of_injective hi _)], exact infinite_univ }
theorem infinite_of_injective_forall_mem [_root_.infinite α] {s : set β} {f : α → β}
(hi : injective f) (hf : ∀ x : α, f x ∈ s) : infinite s :=
by { rw ←range_subset_iff at hf, exact (infinite_range_of_injective hi).mono hf }
theorem finite.preimage {s : set β} {f : α → β}
(I : set.inj_on f (f⁻¹' s)) (h : finite s) : finite (f ⁻¹' s) :=
finite_of_finite_image I (h.subset (image_preimage_subset f s))
theorem finite.preimage_embedding {s : set β} (f : α ↪ β) (h : s.finite) : (f ⁻¹' s).finite :=
finite.preimage (λ _ _ _ _ h', f.injective h') h
lemma finite_option {s : set (option α)} : finite s ↔ finite {x : α | some x ∈ s} :=
⟨λ h, h.preimage_embedding embedding.some,
λ h, ((h.image some).insert none).subset $
λ x, option.cases_on x (λ _, or.inl rfl) (λ x hx, or.inr $ mem_image_of_mem _ hx)⟩
instance fintype_Union [decidable_eq α] [fintype (plift ι)]
(f : ι → set α) [∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.bUnion (λ i : plift ι, (f i.down).to_finset)) $ by simp
theorem finite_Union [fintype (plift ι)] {f : ι → set α} (H : ∀i, finite (f i)) :
finite (⋃ i, f i) :=
⟨@set.fintype_Union _ _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ (λ i, finite.fintype (H i))⟩
/-- A union of sets with `fintype` structure over a set with `fintype` structure has a `fintype`
structure. -/
def fintype_bUnion [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) (H : ∀ i ∈ s, fintype (f i)) : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
by rw bUnion_eq_Union; exact
@set.fintype_Union _ _ _ _ _ (by rintro ⟨i, hi⟩; exact H i hi)
instance fintype_bUnion' [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) [H : ∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
fintype_bUnion _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite.sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : finite s) (H : ∀t∈s, finite t) : finite (⋃₀ s) :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union; haveI := finite.fintype h;
apply finite_Union; simpa using H
theorem finite.bUnion {α} {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} {f : Π i ∈ s, set α} :
finite s → (∀ i ∈ s, finite (f i ‹_›)) → finite (⋃ i∈s, f i ‹_›)
| ⟨hs⟩ h := by rw [bUnion_eq_Union]; exactI finite_Union (λ i, h _ _)
instance fintype_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i < n} :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
instance fintype_le_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i ≤ n} :=
by simpa [nat.lt_succ_iff] using set.fintype_lt_nat (n+1)
lemma finite_le_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i ≤ n} := ⟨set.fintype_le_nat _⟩
lemma finite_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i < n} := ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
lemma infinite.exists_nat_lt {s : set ℕ} (hs : infinite s) (n : ℕ) : ∃ m ∈ s, n < m :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := (hs.diff $ set.finite_le_nat n).nonempty in ⟨m, by simpa using hm⟩
instance fintype_prod (s : set α) (t : set β) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (s ×ˢ t : set _) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.product t.to_finset) $ by simp
lemma finite.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} : finite s → finite t → finite (s ×ˢ t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := by exactI ⟨set.fintype_prod s t⟩
/-- `image2 f s t` is finitype if `s` and `t` are. -/
instance fintype_image2 [decidable_eq γ] (f : α → β → γ) (s : set α) (t : set β)
[hs : fintype s] [ht : fintype t] : fintype (image2 f s t : set γ) :=
by { rw ← image_prod, apply set.fintype_image }
lemma finite.image2 (f : α → β → γ) {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : finite s) (ht : finite t) :
finite (image2 f s t) :=
by { rw ← image_prod, exact (hs.prod ht).image _ }
/-- If `s : set α` is a set with `fintype` instance and `f : α → set β` is a function such that
each `f a`, `a ∈ s`, has a `fintype` structure, then `s >>= f` has a `fintype` structure. -/
def fintype_bind {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, fintype (f a)) : fintype (s >>= f) :=
set.fintype_bUnion _ H
instance fintype_bind' {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) [H : ∀ a, fintype (f a)] : fintype (s >>= f) :=
fintype_bind _ _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite.bind {α β} {s : set α} {f : α → set β} (h : finite s) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, finite (f a)) :
finite (s >>= f) :=
h.bUnion hf
instance fintype_seq [decidable_eq β] (f : set (α → β)) (s : set α) [fintype f] [fintype s] :
fintype (f.seq s) :=
by { rw seq_def, apply set.fintype_bUnion' }
instance fintype_seq' {α β : Type u} [decidable_eq β]
(f : set (α → β)) (s : set α) [fintype f] [fintype s] :
fintype (f <*> s) :=
set.fintype_seq f s
theorem finite.seq {f : set (α → β)} {s : set α} (hf : finite f) (hs : finite s) :
finite (f.seq s) :=
by { rw seq_def, exact hf.bUnion (λ f _, hs.image _) }
theorem finite.seq' {α β : Type u} {f : set (α → β)} {s : set α} (hf : finite f) (hs : finite s) :
finite (f <*> s) :=
hf.seq hs
/-- There are finitely many subsets of a given finite set -/
lemma finite.finite_subsets {α : Type u} {a : set α} (h : finite a) : finite {b | b ⊆ a} :=
⟨fintype.of_finset ((finset.powerset h.to_finset).map finset.coe_emb.1) $ λ s,
by simpa [← @exists_finite_iff_finset α (λ t, t ⊆ a ∧ t = s), subset_to_finset_iff,
← and.assoc] using h.subset⟩
lemma exists_min_image [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f a ≤ f b
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using h1.to_finset.exists_min_image f ⟨x, h1.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
lemma exists_max_image [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ f a
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using h1.to_finset.exists_max_image f ⟨x, h1.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
theorem exists_lower_bound_image [hα : nonempty α] [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β)
(h : s.finite) : ∃ (a : α), ∀ b ∈ s, f a ≤ f b :=
begin
by_cases hs : set.nonempty s,
{ exact let ⟨x₀, H, hx₀⟩ := set.exists_min_image s f h hs in ⟨x₀, λ x hx, hx₀ x hx⟩ },
{ exact nonempty.elim hα (λ a, ⟨a, λ x hx, absurd (set.nonempty_of_mem hx) hs⟩) }
end
theorem exists_upper_bound_image [hα : nonempty α] [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β)
(h : s.finite) : ∃ (a : α), ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ f a :=
begin
by_cases hs : set.nonempty s,
{ exact let ⟨x₀, H, hx₀⟩ := set.exists_max_image s f h hs in ⟨x₀, λ x hx, hx₀ x hx⟩ },
{ exact nonempty.elim hα (λ a, ⟨a, λ x hx, absurd (set.nonempty_of_mem hx) hs⟩) }
end
end set
namespace finset
variables [decidable_eq β]
variables {s : finset α}
lemma finite_to_set (s : finset α) : set.finite (↑s : set α) :=
set.finite_mem_finset s
@[simp] lemma finite_to_set_to_finset {α : Type*} (s : finset α) :
(finite_to_set s).to_finset = s :=
by { ext, rw [set.finite.mem_to_finset, mem_coe] }
end finset
namespace set
/-- Finite product of finite sets is finite -/
lemma finite.pi {δ : Type*} [fintype δ] {κ : δ → Type*} {t : Π d, set (κ d)}
(ht : ∀ d, (t d).finite) :
(pi univ t).finite :=
begin
lift t to Π d, finset (κ d) using ht,
classical,
rw ← fintype.coe_pi_finset,
exact (fintype.pi_finset t).finite_to_set,
end
/-- A finite union of finsets is finite. -/
lemma union_finset_finite_of_range_finite (f : α → finset β) (h : (range f).finite) :
(⋃ a, (f a : set β)).finite :=
begin
rw ← bUnion_range,
exact h.bUnion (λ y hy, y.finite_to_set)
end
lemma finite_subset_Union {s : set α} (hs : finite s)
{ι} {t : ι → set α} (h : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i) : ∃ I : set ι, finite I ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i :=
begin
casesI hs,
choose f hf using show ∀ x : s, ∃ i, x.1 ∈ t i, {simpa [subset_def] using h},
refine ⟨range f, finite_range f, λ x hx, _⟩,
rw [bUnion_range, mem_Union],
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, hf _⟩
end
lemma eq_finite_Union_of_finite_subset_Union {ι} {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} (tfin : finite t)
(h : t ⊆ ⋃ i, s i) :
∃ I : set ι, (finite I) ∧ ∃ σ : {i | i ∈ I} → set α,
(∀ i, finite (σ i)) ∧ (∀ i, σ i ⊆ s i) ∧ t = ⋃ i, σ i :=
let ⟨I, Ifin, hI⟩ := finite_subset_Union tfin h in
⟨I, Ifin, λ x, s x ∩ t,
λ i, tfin.subset (inter_subset_right _ _),
λ i, inter_subset_left _ _,
begin
ext x,
rw mem_Union,
split,
{ intro x_in,
rcases mem_Union.mp (hI x_in) with ⟨i, _, ⟨hi, rfl⟩, H⟩,
use [i, hi, H, x_in] },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact H }
end⟩
/-- An increasing union distributes over finite intersection. -/
lemma Union_Inter_of_monotone {ι ι' α : Type*} [fintype ι] [linear_order ι']
[nonempty ι'] {s : ι → ι' → set α} (hs : ∀ i, monotone (s i)) :
(⋃ j : ι', ⋂ i : ι, s i j) = ⋂ i : ι, ⋃ j : ι', s i j :=
begin
ext x, refine ⟨λ hx, Union_Inter_subset hx, λ hx, _⟩,
simp only [mem_Inter, mem_Union, mem_Inter] at hx ⊢, choose j hj using hx,
obtain ⟨j₀⟩ := show nonempty ι', by apply_instance,
refine ⟨finset.univ.fold max j₀ j, λ i, hs i _ (hj i)⟩,
rw [finset.fold_op_rel_iff_or (@le_max_iff _ _)],
exact or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_univ i, le_rfl⟩
end
lemma Union_pi_of_monotone {ι ι' : Type*} [linear_order ι'] [nonempty ι'] {α : ι → Type*}
{I : set ι} {s : Π i, ι' → set (α i)} (hI : finite I) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, monotone (s i)) :
(⋃ j : ι', I.pi (λ i, s i j)) = I.pi (λ i, ⋃ j, s i j) :=
begin
simp only [pi_def, bInter_eq_Inter, preimage_Union],
haveI := hI.fintype,
exact Union_Inter_of_monotone (λ i j₁ j₂ h, preimage_mono $ hs i i.2 h)
end
lemma Union_univ_pi_of_monotone {ι ι' : Type*} [linear_order ι'] [nonempty ι'] [fintype ι]
{α : ι → Type*} {s : Π i, ι' → set (α i)} (hs : ∀ i, monotone (s i)) :
(⋃ j : ι', pi univ (λ i, s i j)) = pi univ (λ i, ⋃ j, s i j) :=
Union_pi_of_monotone (finite.of_fintype _) (λ i _, hs i)
instance nat.fintype_Iio (n : ℕ) : fintype (Iio n) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
/--
If `P` is some relation between terms of `γ` and sets in `γ`,
such that every finite set `t : set γ` has some `c : γ` related to it,
then there is a recursively defined sequence `u` in `γ`
so `u n` is related to the image of `{0, 1, ..., n-1}` under `u`.
(We use this later to show sequentially compact sets
are totally bounded.)
-/
lemma seq_of_forall_finite_exists {γ : Type*}
{P : γ → set γ → Prop} (h : ∀ t, finite t → ∃ c, P c t) :
∃ u : ℕ → γ, ∀ n, P (u n) (u '' Iio n) :=
⟨λ n, @nat.strong_rec_on' (λ _, γ) n $ λ n ih, classical.some $ h
(range $ λ m : Iio n, ih m.1 m.2)
(finite_range _),
λ n, begin
classical,
refine nat.strong_rec_on' n (λ n ih, _),
rw nat.strong_rec_on_beta', convert classical.some_spec (h _ _),
ext x, split,
{ rintros ⟨m, hmn, rfl⟩, exact ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, rfl⟩, exact ⟨m, hmn, rfl⟩ }
end⟩
lemma finite_range_ite {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f g : α → β} (hf : finite (range f))
(hg : finite (range g)) : finite (range (λ x, if p x then f x else g x)) :=
(hf.union hg).subset range_ite_subset
lemma finite_range_const {c : β} : finite (range (λ x : α, c)) :=
(finite_singleton c).subset range_const_subset
lemma range_find_greatest_subset {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ}:
range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b) ⊆ ↑(finset.range (b + 1)) :=
by { rw range_subset_iff, intro x, simp [nat.lt_succ_iff, nat.find_greatest_le] }
lemma finite_range_find_greatest {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ} :
finite (range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b)) :=
(finset.range (b + 1)).finite_to_set.subset range_find_greatest_subset
lemma card_lt_card {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (h : s ⊂ t) :
fintype.card s < fintype.card t :=
fintype.card_lt_of_injective_not_surjective (set.inclusion h.1) (set.inclusion_injective h.1) $
λ hst, (ssubset_iff_subset_ne.1 h).2 (eq_of_inclusion_surjective hst)
lemma card_le_of_subset {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (hsub : s ⊆ t) :
fintype.card s ≤ fintype.card t :=
fintype.card_le_of_injective (set.inclusion hsub) (set.inclusion_injective hsub)
lemma eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t]
(hsub : s ⊆ t) (hcard : fintype.card t ≤ fintype.card s) : s = t :=
(eq_or_ssubset_of_subset hsub).elim id
(λ h, absurd hcard $ not_le_of_lt $ card_lt_card h)
lemma subset_iff_to_finset_subset (s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t] :
s ⊆ t ↔ s.to_finset ⊆ t.to_finset :=
by simp
@[simp, mono] lemma finite.to_finset_mono {s t : set α} {hs : finite s} {ht : finite t} :
hs.to_finset ⊆ ht.to_finset ↔ s ⊆ t :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x,
rw [←finite.mem_to_finset hs, ←finite.mem_to_finset ht],
exact λ hx, h hx },
{ intros h x,
rw [finite.mem_to_finset hs, finite.mem_to_finset ht],
exact λ hx, h hx }
end
@[simp, mono] lemma finite.to_finset_strict_mono {s t : set α} {hs : finite s} {ht : finite t} :
hs.to_finset ⊂ ht.to_finset ↔ s ⊂ t :=
begin
rw [←lt_eq_ssubset, ←finset.lt_iff_ssubset, lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne],
simp
end
lemma card_range_of_injective [fintype α] {f : α → β} (hf : injective f)
[fintype (range f)] : fintype.card (range f) = fintype.card α :=
eq.symm $ fintype.card_congr $ equiv.of_injective f hf
lemma finite.exists_maximal_wrt [partial_order β] (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : set.finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ a' ∈ s, f a ≤ f a' → f a = f a' :=
begin
classical,
refine h.induction_on _ _,
{ exact λ h, absurd h empty_not_nonempty },
intros a s his _ ih _,
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ use a, simp [h] },
rcases ih h with ⟨b, hb, ih⟩,
by_cases f b ≤ f a,
{ refine ⟨a, set.mem_insert _ _, λ c hc hac, le_antisymm hac _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ refl },
{ rwa [← ih c hcs (le_trans h hac)] } },
{ refine ⟨b, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hb, λ c hc hbc, _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ exact (h hbc).elim },
{ exact ih c hcs hbc } }
end
lemma finite.card_to_finset {s : set α} [fintype s] (h : s.finite) :
h.to_finset.card = fintype.card s :=
begin
rw [← finset.card_attach, finset.attach_eq_univ, ← fintype.card],
refine fintype.card_congr (equiv.set_congr _),
ext x, show x ∈ h.to_finset ↔ x ∈ s,
simp,
end
lemma infinite.exists_not_mem_finset {s : set α} (hs : s.infinite) (f : finset α) :
∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ f :=
let ⟨a, has, haf⟩ := (hs.diff f.finite_to_set).nonempty in ⟨a, has, λ h, haf $ finset.mem_coe.1 h⟩
section decidable_eq
lemma to_finset_compl {α : Type*} [fintype α] [decidable_eq α]
(s : set α) [fintype (sᶜ : set α)] [fintype s] : sᶜ.to_finset = (s.to_finset)ᶜ :=
by ext; simp
lemma to_finset_inter {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype (s ∩ t : set α)]
[fintype s] [fintype t] : (s ∩ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∩ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
lemma to_finset_union {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype (s ∪ t : set α)]
[fintype s] [fintype t] : (s ∪ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
instance fintype_sdiff {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α]
(s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t] :
fintype (s \ t : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset \ t.to_finset) $ by simp
lemma to_finset_sdiff {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t]
[fintype (s \ t : set α)] : (s \ t).to_finset = s.to_finset \ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
lemma to_finset_ne_eq_erase {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] (a : α)
[fintype {x : α | x ≠ a}] : {x : α | x ≠ a}.to_finset = finset.univ.erase a :=
by ext; simp
lemma card_ne_eq [fintype α] (a : α) [fintype {x : α | x ≠ a}] :
fintype.card {x : α | x ≠ a} = fintype.card α - 1 :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α,
rw [←to_finset_card, to_finset_ne_eq_erase, finset.card_erase_of_mem (finset.mem_univ _),
finset.card_univ, nat.pred_eq_sub_one],
end
end decidable_eq
section
variables [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded above.-/
protected lemma finite.bdd_above (hs : finite s) : bdd_above s :=
finite.induction_on hs bdd_above_empty $ λ a s _ _ h, h.insert a
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded above is still bounded above.-/
lemma finite.bdd_above_bUnion {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_above (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_above (S i)) :=
finite.induction_on H
(by simp only [bUnion_empty, bdd_above_empty, ball_empty_iff])
(λ a s ha _ hs, by simp only [bUnion_insert, ball_insert_iff, bdd_above_union, hs])
end
section
variables [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded below.-/
protected lemma finite.bdd_below (hs : finite s) : bdd_below s :=
@finite.bdd_above (order_dual α) _ _ _ hs
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded below is still bounded below.-/
lemma finite.bdd_below_bUnion {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_below (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_below (S i)) :=
@finite.bdd_above_bUnion (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ H
end
end set
namespace finset
/-- A finset is bounded above. -/
protected lemma bdd_above [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] (s : finset α) :
bdd_above (↑s : set α) :=
s.finite_to_set.bdd_above
/-- A finset is bounded below. -/
protected lemma bdd_below [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] (s : finset α) :
bdd_below (↑s : set α) :=
s.finite_to_set.bdd_below
end finset
namespace fintype
variables [fintype α] {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
@[simp]
lemma card_subtype_compl : fintype.card {x // ¬ p x} = fintype.card α - fintype.card {x // p x} :=
begin
classical,
rw [fintype.card_of_subtype (set.to_finset pᶜ), set.to_finset_compl p, finset.card_compl,
fintype.card_of_subtype (set.to_finset p)];
intros; simp; refl
end
/-- If two subtypes of a fintype have equal cardinality, so do their complements. -/
lemma card_compl_eq_card_compl (h : fintype.card {x // p x} = fintype.card {x // q x}) :
fintype.card {x // ¬ p x} = fintype.card {x // ¬ q x} :=
by simp only [card_subtype_compl, h]
end fintype
/--
If a set `s` does not contain any elements between any pair of elements `x, z ∈ s` with `x ≤ z`
(i.e if given `x, y, z ∈ s` such that `x ≤ y ≤ z`, then `y` is either `x` or `z`), then `s` is
finite.
-/
lemma set.finite_of_forall_between_eq_endpoints {α : Type*} [linear_order α] (s : set α)
(h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (z ∈ s), x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x = y ∨ y = z) :
set.finite s :=
begin
by_contra hinf,
change s.infinite at hinf,
rcases hinf.exists_subset_card_eq 3 with ⟨t, hts, ht⟩,
let f := t.order_iso_of_fin ht,
let x := f 0,
let y := f 1,
let z := f 2,
have := h x (hts x.2) y (hts y.2) z (hts z.2)
(f.monotone $ by dec_trivial) (f.monotone $ by dec_trivial),
have key₁ : (0 : fin 3) ≠ 1 := by dec_trivial,
have key₂ : (1 : fin 3) ≠ 2 := by dec_trivial,
cases this,
{ dsimp only [x, y] at this, exact key₁ (f.injective $ subtype.coe_injective this) },
{ dsimp only [y, z] at this, exact key₂ (f.injective $ subtype.coe_injective this) }
end
|
1ec2a5b934b8a215902b41d1200264d938a2fdb6 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/measure_theory/measure/regular.lean | 49c5c34b32eb7de321a3663b25496dc07f552a01 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 33,793 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris Van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space
/-!
# Regular measures
A measure is `outer_regular` if the measure of any measurable set `A` is the infimum of `μ U` over
all open sets `U` containing `A`.
A measure is `regular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is finite on compact sets;
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to compacts sets: the measure of any open set `U`
is the supremum of `μ K` over all compact sets `K` contained in `U`.
A measure is `weakly_regular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to closed sets: the measure of any open set `U`
is the supremum of `μ F` over all compact sets `F` contained in `U`.
In a Hausdorff topological space, regularity implies weak regularity. These three conditions are
registered as typeclasses for a measure `μ`, and this implication is recorded as an instance.
In order to avoid code duplication, we also define a measure `μ` to be `inner_regular` for sets
satisfying a predicate `q` with respect to sets satisfying a predicate `p` if for any set
`U ∈ {U | q U}` and a number `r < μ U` there exists `F ⊆ U` such that `p F` and `r < μ F`.
We prove that inner regularity for open sets with respect to compact sets or closed sets implies
inner regularity for all measurable sets of finite measure (with respect to
compact sets or closed sets respectively), and register some corollaries for (weakly) regular
measures.
Note that a similar statement for measurable sets of infinite mass can fail. For a counterexample,
consider the group `ℝ × ℝ` where the first factor has the discrete topology and the second one the
usual topology. It is a locally compact Hausdorff topological group, with Haar measure equal to
Lebesgue measure on each vertical fiber. The set `ℝ × {0}` has infinite measure (by outer
regularity), but any compact set it contains has zero measure (as it is finite).
Several authors require as a definition of regularity that all measurable sets are inner regular.
We have opted for the slightly weaker definition above as it holds for all Haar measures, it is
enough for essentially all applications, and it is equivalent to the other definition when the
measure is finite.
The interest of the notion of weak regularity is that it is enough for many applications, and it
is automatically satisfied by any finite measure on a metric space.
## Main definitions
* `measure_theory.measure.outer_regular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is outer regular.
* `measure_theory.measure.regular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a topological
space is regular.
* `measure_theory.measure.weakly_regular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is weakly regular.
* `measure_theory.measure.inner_regular μ p q`: a non-typeclass predicate saying that a measure `μ`
is inner regular for sets satisfying `q` with respect to sets satisfying `p`.
## Main results
### Outer regular measures
* `set.measure_eq_infi_is_open` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, the measure of a
set is the infimum of the measure of open sets containing it.
* `set.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt'` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, for every set `s`
and `r > μ s` there exists an open superset `U ⊇ s` of measure less than `r`.
* push forward of an outer regular measure is outer regular, and scalar multiplication of a regular
measure by a finite number is outer regular.
* `measure_theory.measure.outer_regular.of_sigma_compact_space_of_is_locally_finite_measure`:
a locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact metric (or even pseudo emetric) space is outer regular.
### Weakly regular measures
* `is_open.measure_eq_supr_is_closed` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `is_open.exists_lt_is_closed`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a closed `F ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `measurable_set.measure_eq_supr_is_closed_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `measurable_set.exists_lt_is_closed_of_ne_top` and `measurable_set.exists_is_closed_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a closed subset (stated as
`r < μ F` and `μ s < μ F + ε`, respectively).
* `measure_theory.measure.weakly_regular.of_pseudo_emetric_space_of_is_finite_measure` is an
instance registering that a finite measure on a metric space is weakly regular (in fact, a pseudo
emetric space is enough);
* `measure_theory.measure.weakly_regular.of_pseudo_emetric_sigma_compact_space_of_locally_finite`
is an instance registering that a locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact metric space (or even
a pseudo emetric space) is weakly regular.
### Regular measures
* `is_open.measure_eq_supr_is_compact` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `is_open.exists_lt_is_compact`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a compact `K ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `measurable_set.measure_eq_supr_is_compact_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `measurable_set.exists_lt_is_compact_of_ne_top` and `measurable_set.exists_is_compact_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a compact subset (stated as
`r < μ K` and `μ s < μ K + ε`, respectively).
* `measure_theory.measure.regular.of_sigma_compact_space_of_is_locally_finite_measure` is an
instance registering that a locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact metric space is regular (in
fact, an emetric space is enough).
## Implementation notes
The main nontrivial statement is `measure_theory.measure.inner_regular.weakly_regular_of_finite`,
expressing that in a finite measure space, if every open set can be approximated from inside by
closed sets, then the measure is in fact weakly regular. To prove that we show that any measurable
set can be approximated from inside by closed sets and from outside by open sets. This statement is
proved by measurable induction, starting from open sets and checking that it is stable by taking
complements (this is the point of this condition, being symmetrical between inside and outside) and
countable disjoint unions.
Once this statement is proved, one deduces results for `σ`-finite measures from this statement, by
restricting them to finite measure sets (and proving that this restriction is weakly regular, using
again the same statement).
## References
[Halmos, Measure Theory, §52][halmos1950measure]. Note that Halmos uses an unusual definition of
Borel sets (for him, they are elements of the `σ`-algebra generated by compact sets!), so his
proofs or statements do not apply directly.
[Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures][billingsley1999]
-/
open set filter
open_locale ennreal topological_space nnreal big_operators
namespace measure_theory
namespace measure
/-- We say that a measure `μ` is *inner regular* with respect to predicates `p q : set α → Prop`,
if for every `U` such that `q U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a subset `K ⊆ U` satisfying `p K`
of measure greater than `r`.
This definition is used to prove some facts about regular and weakly regular measures without
repeating the proofs. -/
def inner_regular {α} {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (p q : set α → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃U⦄, q U → ∀ r < μ U, ∃ K ⊆ U, p K ∧ r < μ K
namespace inner_regular
variables {α : Type*} {m : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α} {p q : set α → Prop}
{U : set α} {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
lemma measure_eq_supr (H : inner_regular μ p q) (hU : q U) : μ U = ⨆ (K ⊆ U) (hK : p K), μ K :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt $ λ r hr, _) (supr₂_le $ λ K hK, supr_le $ λ _, μ.mono hK),
simpa only [lt_supr_iff, exists_prop] using H hU r hr
end
lemma exists_subset_lt_add (H : inner_regular μ p q) (h0 : p ∅) (hU : q U) (hμU : μ U ≠ ∞)
(hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ K ⊆ U, p K ∧ μ U < μ K + ε :=
begin
cases eq_or_ne (μ U) 0 with h₀ h₀,
{ refine ⟨∅, empty_subset _, h0, _⟩,
rwa [measure_empty, h₀, zero_add, pos_iff_ne_zero] },
{ rcases H hU _ (ennreal.sub_lt_self hμU h₀ hε) with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hrK⟩,
exact ⟨K, hKU, hKc, ennreal.lt_add_of_sub_lt_right (or.inl hμU) hrK⟩ }
end
lemma map {α β} [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] {μ : measure α} {pa qa : set α → Prop}
(H : inner_regular μ pa qa) (f : α ≃ β) (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
{pb qb : set β → Prop} (hAB : ∀ U, qb U → qa (f ⁻¹' U)) (hAB' : ∀ K, pa K → pb (f '' K))
(hB₁ : ∀ K, pb K → measurable_set K) (hB₂ : ∀ U, qb U → measurable_set U) :
inner_regular (map f μ) pb qb :=
begin
intros U hU r hr,
rw [map_apply_of_ae_measurable hf (hB₂ _ hU)] at hr,
rcases H (hAB U hU) r hr with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hK⟩,
refine ⟨f '' K, image_subset_iff.2 hKU, hAB' _ hKc, _⟩,
rwa [map_apply_of_ae_measurable hf (hB₁ _ $ hAB' _ hKc), f.preimage_image]
end
lemma smul (H : inner_regular μ p q) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : inner_regular (c • μ) p q :=
begin
intros U hU r hr,
rw [smul_apply, H.measure_eq_supr hU, smul_eq_mul] at hr,
simpa only [ennreal.mul_supr, lt_supr_iff, exists_prop] using hr
end
lemma trans {q' : set α → Prop} (H : inner_regular μ p q) (H' : inner_regular μ q q') :
inner_regular μ p q' :=
begin
intros U hU r hr,
rcases H' hU r hr with ⟨F, hFU, hqF, hF⟩, rcases H hqF _ hF with ⟨K, hKF, hpK, hrK⟩,
exact ⟨K, hKF.trans hFU, hpK, hrK⟩
end
end inner_regular
variables {α β : Type*} [measurable_space α] [topological_space α] {μ : measure α}
/-- A measure `μ` is outer regular if `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for a measurable set `A`.
This definition implies the same equality for any (not necessarily measurable) set, see
`set.measure_eq_infi_is_open`. -/
@[protect_proj] class outer_regular (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
(outer_regular : ∀ ⦃A : set α⦄, measurable_set A → ∀ r > μ A, ∃ U ⊇ A, is_open U ∧ μ U < r)
/-- A measure `μ` is regular if
- it is finite on all compact sets;
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using compact sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ U compact}` for `U` open. -/
@[protect_proj] class regular (μ : measure α)
extends is_finite_measure_on_compacts μ, outer_regular μ : Prop :=
(inner_regular : inner_regular μ is_compact is_open)
/-- A measure `μ` is weakly regular if
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using closed sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(F) | F ⊆ U compact}` for `U` open. -/
@[protect_proj] class weakly_regular (μ : measure α) extends outer_regular μ : Prop :=
(inner_regular : inner_regular μ is_closed is_open)
/-- A regular measure is weakly regular. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance regular.weakly_regular [t2_space α] [regular μ] : weakly_regular μ :=
{ inner_regular := λ U hU r hr, let ⟨K, hKU, hcK, hK⟩ := regular.inner_regular hU r hr
in ⟨K, hKU, hcK.is_closed, hK⟩ }
namespace outer_regular
instance zero : outer_regular (0 : measure α) :=
⟨λ A hA r hr, ⟨univ, subset_univ A, is_open_univ, hr⟩⟩
/-- Given `r` larger than the measure of a set `A`, there exists an open superset of `A` with
measure less than `r`. -/
lemma _root_.set.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt [outer_regular μ] (A : set α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : μ A < r) :
∃ U ⊇ A, is_open U ∧ μ U < r :=
begin
rcases outer_regular.outer_regular (measurable_set_to_measurable μ A) r
(by rwa measure_to_measurable) with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩,
exact ⟨U, (subset_to_measurable _ _).trans hAU, hUo, hU⟩
end
/-- For an outer regular measure, the measure of a set is the infimum of the measures of open sets
containing it. -/
lemma _root_.set.measure_eq_infi_is_open (A : set α) (μ : measure α) [outer_regular μ] :
μ A = (⨅ (U : set α) (h : A ⊆ U) (h2 : is_open U), μ U) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_infi₂ $ λ s hs, le_infi $ λ h2s, μ.mono hs) _,
refine le_of_forall_lt' (λ r hr, _),
simpa only [infi_lt_iff, exists_prop] using A.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt r hr
end
lemma _root_.set.exists_is_open_lt_add [outer_regular μ] (A : set α) (hA : μ A ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U ⊇ A, is_open U ∧ μ U < μ A + ε :=
A.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt _ (ennreal.lt_add_right hA hε)
lemma _root_.set.exists_is_open_le_add (A : set α) (μ : measure α) [outer_regular μ]
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U ⊇ A, is_open U ∧ μ U ≤ μ A + ε :=
begin
rcases le_or_lt ∞ (μ A) with H|H,
{ exact ⟨univ, subset_univ _, is_open_univ,
by simp only [top_le_iff.mp H, ennreal.top_add, le_top]⟩ },
{ rcases A.exists_is_open_lt_add H.ne hε with ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU⟩,
exact ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU.le⟩ }
end
lemma _root_.measurable_set.exists_is_open_diff_lt [outer_regular μ] {A : set α}
(hA : measurable_set A) (hA' : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U ⊇ A, is_open U ∧ μ U < ∞ ∧ μ (U \ A) < ε :=
begin
rcases A.exists_is_open_lt_add hA' hε with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩,
use [U, hAU, hUo, hU.trans_le le_top],
exact measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add hA hAU hA' hU,
end
protected lemma map [opens_measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [topological_space β]
[borel_space β] (f : α ≃ₜ β) (μ : measure α) [outer_regular μ] :
(measure.map f μ).outer_regular :=
begin
refine ⟨λ A hA r hr, _⟩,
rw [map_apply f.measurable hA, ← f.image_symm] at hr,
rcases set.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt _ r hr with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩,
have : is_open (f.symm ⁻¹' U), from hUo.preimage f.symm.continuous,
refine ⟨f.symm ⁻¹' U, image_subset_iff.1 hAU, this, _⟩,
rwa [map_apply f.measurable this.measurable_set, f.preimage_symm, f.preimage_image],
end
protected lemma smul (μ : measure α) [outer_regular μ] {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ∞) :
(x • μ).outer_regular :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl|h0,
{ rw zero_smul, exact outer_regular.zero },
{ refine ⟨λ A hA r hr, _⟩,
rw [smul_apply, A.measure_eq_infi_is_open, smul_eq_mul] at hr,
simpa only [ennreal.mul_infi_of_ne h0 hx, gt_iff_lt, infi_lt_iff, exists_prop] using hr }
end
end outer_regular
/-- If a measure `μ` admits finite spanning open sets such that the restriction of `μ` to each set
is outer regular, then the original measure is outer regular as well. -/
protected lemma finite_spanning_sets_in.outer_regular [opens_measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(s : μ.finite_spanning_sets_in {U | is_open U ∧ outer_regular (μ.restrict U)}) :
outer_regular μ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ A hA r hr, _⟩,
have hm : ∀ n, measurable_set (s.set n), from λ n, (s.set_mem n).1.measurable_set,
haveI : ∀ n, outer_regular (μ.restrict (s.set n)) := λ n, (s.set_mem n).2,
-- Note that `A = ⋃ n, A ∩ disjointed s n`. We replace `A` with this sequence.
obtain ⟨A, hAm, hAs, hAd, rfl⟩ : ∃ A' : ℕ → set α, (∀ n, measurable_set (A' n)) ∧
(∀ n, A' n ⊆ s.set n) ∧ pairwise (disjoint on A') ∧ A = ⋃ n, A' n,
{ refine ⟨λ n, A ∩ disjointed s.set n, λ n, hA.inter (measurable_set.disjointed hm _),
λ n, (inter_subset_right _ _).trans (disjointed_subset _ _),
(disjoint_disjointed s.set).mono (λ k l hkl, hkl.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right), _⟩,
rw [← inter_Union, Union_disjointed, s.spanning, inter_univ] },
rcases ennreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable' (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, hδε⟩,
rw [lt_tsub_iff_right, add_comm] at hδε,
have : ∀ n, ∃ U ⊇ A n, is_open U ∧ μ U < μ (A n) + δ n,
{ intro n,
have H₁ : ∀ t, μ.restrict (s.set n) t = μ (t ∩ s.set n), from λ t, restrict_apply' (hm n),
have Ht : μ.restrict (s.set n) (A n) ≠ ⊤,
{ rw H₁, exact ((measure_mono $ inter_subset_right _ _).trans_lt (s.finite n)).ne },
rcases (A n).exists_is_open_lt_add Ht (δ0 n).ne' with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩,
rw [H₁, H₁, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (hAs _)] at hU,
exact ⟨U ∩ s.set n, subset_inter hAU (hAs _), hUo.inter (s.set_mem n).1, hU⟩ },
choose U hAU hUo hU,
refine ⟨⋃ n, U n, Union_mono hAU, is_open_Union hUo, _⟩,
calc μ (⋃ n, U n) ≤ ∑' n, μ (U n) : measure_Union_le _
... ≤ ∑' n, (μ (A n) + δ n) : ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, (hU n).le)
... = ∑' n, μ (A n) + ∑' n, δ n : ennreal.tsum_add
... = μ (⋃ n, A n) + ∑' n, δ n : congr_arg2 (+) (measure_Union hAd hAm).symm rfl
... < r : hδε
end
namespace inner_regular
variables {p q : set α → Prop} {U s : set α} {ε r : ℝ≥0∞}
/-- If a measure is inner regular (using closed or compact sets), then every measurable set of
finite measure can by approximated by a (closed or compact) subset. -/
lemma measurable_set_of_open [outer_regular μ]
(H : inner_regular μ p is_open) (h0 : p ∅) (hd : ∀ ⦃s U⦄, p s → is_open U → p (s \ U)) :
inner_regular μ p (λ s, measurable_set s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞) :=
begin
rintros s ⟨hs, hμs⟩ r hr,
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hεs, rfl⟩ : ∃ ε ≠ 0, ε + ε ≤ μ s ∧ r = μ s - (ε + ε),
{ use (μ s - r) / 2, simp [*, hr.le, ennreal.add_halves, ennreal.sub_sub_cancel, le_add_right] },
rcases hs.exists_is_open_diff_lt hμs hε with ⟨U, hsU, hUo, hUt, hμU⟩,
rcases (U \ s).exists_is_open_lt_of_lt _ hμU with ⟨U', hsU', hU'o, hμU'⟩,
replace hsU' := diff_subset_comm.1 hsU',
rcases H.exists_subset_lt_add h0 hUo hUt.ne hε with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hKr⟩,
refine ⟨K \ U', λ x hx, hsU' ⟨hKU hx.1, hx.2⟩, hd hKc hU'o, ennreal.sub_lt_of_lt_add hεs _⟩,
calc μ s ≤ μ U : μ.mono hsU
... < μ K + ε : hKr
... ≤ μ (K \ U') + μ U' + ε :
add_le_add_right (tsub_le_iff_right.1 le_measure_diff) _
... ≤ μ (K \ U') + ε + ε : by { mono*, exacts [hμU'.le, le_rfl] }
... = μ (K \ U') + (ε + ε) : add_assoc _ _ _
end
open finset
/-- In a finite measure space, assume that any open set can be approximated from inside by closed
sets. Then the measure is weakly regular. -/
lemma weakly_regular_of_finite [borel_space α] (μ : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ]
(H : inner_regular μ is_closed is_open) : weakly_regular μ :=
begin
have hfin : ∀ {s}, μ s ≠ ⊤ := measure_ne_top μ,
suffices : ∀ s, measurable_set s → ∀ ε ≠ 0,
∃ (F ⊆ s) (U ⊇ s), is_closed F ∧ is_open U ∧ μ s ≤ μ F + ε ∧ μ U ≤ μ s + ε,
{ refine { outer_regular := λ s hs r hr, _, inner_regular := H },
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hsr', hr'r⟩,
rcases this s hs _ (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hsr').ne' with ⟨-, -, U, hsU, -, hUo, -, H⟩,
refine ⟨U, hsU, hUo, _⟩,
rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le hsr'.le] at H, exact H.trans_lt hr'r },
refine measurable_set.induction_on_open _ _ _,
/- The proof is by measurable induction: we should check that the property is true for the empty
set, for open sets, and is stable by taking the complement and by taking countable disjoint
unions. The point of the property we are proving is that it is stable by taking complements
(exchanging the roles of closed and open sets and thanks to the finiteness of the measure). -/
-- check for open set
{ intros U hU ε hε,
rcases H.exists_subset_lt_add is_closed_empty hU hfin hε with ⟨F, hsF, hFc, hF⟩,
exact ⟨F, hsF, U, subset.rfl, hFc, hU, hF.le, le_self_add⟩ },
-- check for complements
{ rintros s hs H ε hε,
rcases H ε hε with ⟨F, hFs, U, hsU, hFc, hUo, hF, hU⟩,
refine ⟨Uᶜ, compl_subset_compl.2 hsU, Fᶜ, compl_subset_compl.2 hFs,
hUo.is_closed_compl, hFc.is_open_compl, _⟩,
simp only [measure_compl_le_add_iff, *, hUo.measurable_set, hFc.measurable_set, true_and] },
-- check for disjoint unions
{ intros s hsd hsm H ε ε0, have ε0' : ε / 2 ≠ 0, from (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
rcases ennreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable' ε0' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, hδε⟩,
choose F hFs U hsU hFc hUo hF hU using λ n, H n (δ n) (δ0 n).ne',
-- the approximating closed set is constructed by considering finitely many sets `s i`, which
-- cover all the measure up to `ε/2`, approximating each of these by a closed set `F i`, and
-- taking the union of these (finitely many) `F i`.
have : tendsto (λ t, ∑ k in t, μ (s k) + ε / 2) at_top (𝓝 $ μ (⋃ n, s n) + ε / 2),
{ rw measure_Union hsd hsm, exact tendsto.add ennreal.summable.has_sum tendsto_const_nhds },
rcases (this.eventually $ lt_mem_nhds $ ennreal.lt_add_right hfin ε0').exists with ⟨t, ht⟩,
-- the approximating open set is constructed by taking for each `s n` an approximating open set
-- `U n` with measure at most `μ (s n) + δ n` for a summable `δ`, and taking the union of these.
refine ⟨⋃ k ∈ t, F k, Union_mono $ λ k, Union_subset $ λ _, hFs _,
⋃ n, U n, Union_mono hsU, is_closed_bUnion t.finite_to_set $ λ k _, hFc k,
is_open_Union hUo, ht.le.trans _, _⟩,
{ calc ∑ k in t, μ (s k) + ε / 2 ≤ ∑ k in t, μ (F k) + ∑ k in t, δ k + ε / 2 :
by { rw ← sum_add_distrib, exact add_le_add_right (sum_le_sum $ λ k hk, hF k) _ }
... ≤ ∑ k in t, μ (F k) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 :
add_le_add_right (add_le_add_left ((ennreal.sum_le_tsum _).trans hδε.le) _) _
... = μ (⋃ k ∈ t, F k) + ε : _,
rw [measure_bUnion_finset, add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves],
exacts [λ k _ n _ hkn, (hsd k n hkn).mono (hFs k) (hFs n), λ k hk, (hFc k).measurable_set] },
{ calc μ (⋃ n, U n) ≤ ∑' n, μ (U n) : measure_Union_le _
... ≤ ∑' n, (μ (s n) + δ n) : ennreal.tsum_le_tsum hU
... = μ (⋃ n, s n) + ∑' n, δ n : by rw [measure_Union hsd hsm, ennreal.tsum_add]
... ≤ μ (⋃ n, s n) + ε : add_le_add_left (hδε.le.trans ennreal.half_le_self) _ } }
end
/-- In a metric space (or even a pseudo emetric space), an open set can be approximated from inside
by closed sets. -/
lemma of_pseudo_emetric_space {X : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space X]
[measurable_space X] (μ : measure X) :
inner_regular μ is_closed is_open :=
begin
intros U hU r hr,
rcases hU.exists_Union_is_closed with ⟨F, F_closed, -, rfl, F_mono⟩,
rw measure_Union_eq_supr F_mono.directed_le at hr,
rcases lt_supr_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨F n, subset_Union _ _, F_closed n, hn⟩
end
/-- In a `σ`-compact space, any closed set can be approximated by a compact subset. -/
lemma is_compact_is_closed {X : Type*} [topological_space X]
[sigma_compact_space X] [measurable_space X] (μ : measure X) :
inner_regular μ is_compact is_closed :=
begin
intros F hF r hr,
set B : ℕ → set X := compact_covering X,
have hBc : ∀ n, is_compact (F ∩ B n), from λ n, (is_compact_compact_covering X n).inter_left hF,
have hBU : (⋃ n, F ∩ B n) = F, by rw [← inter_Union, Union_compact_covering, set.inter_univ],
have : μ F = ⨆ n, μ (F ∩ B n),
{ rw [← measure_Union_eq_supr, hBU],
exact monotone.directed_le
(λ m n h, inter_subset_inter_right _ (compact_covering_subset _ h)) },
rw this at hr, rcases lt_supr_iff.1 hr with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨_, inter_subset_left _ _, hBc n, hn⟩
end
end inner_regular
namespace regular
instance zero : regular (0 : measure α) :=
⟨λ U hU r hr, ⟨∅, empty_subset _, is_compact_empty, hr⟩⟩
/-- If `μ` is a regular measure, then any open set can be approximated by a compact subset. -/
lemma _root_.is_open.exists_lt_is_compact [regular μ] ⦃U : set α⦄ (hU : is_open U)
{r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < μ U) :
∃ K ⊆ U, is_compact K ∧ r < μ K :=
regular.inner_regular hU r hr
/-- The measure of an open set is the supremum of the measures of compact sets it contains. -/
lemma _root_.is_open.measure_eq_supr_is_compact ⦃U : set α⦄ (hU : is_open U)
(μ : measure α) [regular μ] :
μ U = (⨆ (K : set α) (h : K ⊆ U) (h2 : is_compact K), μ K) :=
regular.inner_regular.measure_eq_supr hU
lemma exists_compact_not_null [regular μ] : (∃ K, is_compact K ∧ μ K ≠ 0) ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
by simp_rw [ne.def, ← measure_univ_eq_zero, is_open_univ.measure_eq_supr_is_compact,
ennreal.supr_eq_zero, not_forall, exists_prop, subset_univ, true_and]
/-- If `μ` is a regular measure, then any measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a
compact subset. See also `measurable_set.exists_is_compact_lt_add` and
`measurable_set.exists_lt_is_compact_of_ne_top`. -/
lemma inner_regular_measurable [regular μ] :
inner_regular μ is_compact (λ s, measurable_set s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞) :=
regular.inner_regular.measurable_set_of_open is_compact_empty (λ _ _, is_compact.diff)
/-- If `μ` is a regular measure, then any measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a
compact subset. See also `measurable_set.exists_lt_is_compact_of_ne_top`. -/
lemma _root_.measurable_set.exists_is_compact_lt_add
[regular μ] ⦃A : set α⦄ (hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ K ⊆ A, is_compact K ∧ μ A < μ K + ε :=
regular.inner_regular_measurable.exists_subset_lt_add is_compact_empty ⟨hA, h'A⟩ h'A hε
/-- If `μ` is a regular measure, then any measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a
compact subset. See also `measurable_set.exists_is_compact_lt_add` and
`measurable_set.exists_lt_is_compact_of_ne_top`. -/
lemma _root_.measurable_set.exists_is_compact_diff_lt [opens_measurable_space α] [t2_space α]
[regular μ] ⦃A : set α⦄ (hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ K ⊆ A, is_compact K ∧ μ (A \ K) < ε :=
begin
rcases hA.exists_is_compact_lt_add h'A hε with ⟨K, hKA, hKc, hK⟩,
exact ⟨K, hKA, hKc, measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add hKc.measurable_set hKA
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h'A $ measure_mono hKA) hK⟩
end
/-- If `μ` is a regular measure, then any measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a
compact subset. See also `measurable_set.exists_is_compact_lt_add`. -/
lemma _root_.measurable_set.exists_lt_is_compact_of_ne_top [regular μ] ⦃A : set α⦄
(hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < μ A) :
∃ K ⊆ A, is_compact K ∧ r < μ K :=
regular.inner_regular_measurable ⟨hA, h'A⟩ _ hr
/-- Given a regular measure, any measurable set of finite mass can be approximated from
inside by compact sets. -/
lemma _root_.measurable_set.measure_eq_supr_is_compact_of_ne_top [regular μ]
⦃A : set α⦄ (hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) :
μ A = (⨆ (K ⊆ A) (h : is_compact K), μ K) :=
regular.inner_regular_measurable.measure_eq_supr ⟨hA, h'A⟩
protected lemma map [opens_measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [topological_space β]
[t2_space β] [borel_space β] [regular μ] (f : α ≃ₜ β) :
(measure.map f μ).regular :=
begin
haveI := outer_regular.map f μ,
haveI := is_finite_measure_on_compacts.map μ f,
exact ⟨regular.inner_regular.map f.to_equiv f.measurable.ae_measurable
(λ U hU, hU.preimage f.continuous) (λ K hK, hK.image f.continuous)
(λ K hK, hK.measurable_set) (λ U hU, hU.measurable_set)⟩
end
protected lemma smul [regular μ] {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ∞) :
(x • μ).regular :=
begin
haveI := outer_regular.smul μ hx,
haveI := is_finite_measure_on_compacts.smul μ hx,
exact ⟨regular.inner_regular.smul x⟩
end
/-- A regular measure in a σ-compact space is σ-finite. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance sigma_finite [sigma_compact_space α] [regular μ] : sigma_finite μ :=
⟨⟨{ set := compact_covering α,
set_mem := λ n, trivial,
finite := λ n, (is_compact_compact_covering α n).measure_lt_top,
spanning := Union_compact_covering α }⟩⟩
end regular
namespace weakly_regular
/-- If `μ` is a weakly regular measure, then any open set can be approximated by a closed subset. -/
lemma _root_.is_open.exists_lt_is_closed [weakly_regular μ] ⦃U : set α⦄ (hU : is_open U)
{r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < μ U) :
∃ F ⊆ U, is_closed F ∧ r < μ F :=
weakly_regular.inner_regular hU r hr
/-- If `μ` is a weakly regular measure, then any open set can be approximated by a closed subset. -/
lemma _root_.is_open.measure_eq_supr_is_closed ⦃U : set α⦄ (hU : is_open U)
(μ : measure α) [weakly_regular μ] :
μ U = (⨆ (F ⊆ U) (h : is_closed F), μ F) :=
weakly_regular.inner_regular.measure_eq_supr hU
lemma inner_regular_measurable [weakly_regular μ] :
inner_regular μ is_closed (λ s, measurable_set s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞) :=
weakly_regular.inner_regular.measurable_set_of_open is_closed_empty
(λ _ _ h₁ h₂, h₁.inter h₂.is_closed_compl)
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, a weakly regular measure `μ` is finite on `s`, and `ε` is a positive
number, then there exist a closed set `K ⊆ s` such that `μ s < μ K + ε`. -/
lemma _root_.measurable_set.exists_is_closed_lt_add [weakly_regular μ] {s : set α}
(hs : measurable_set s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ K ⊆ s, is_closed K ∧ μ s < μ K + ε :=
inner_regular_measurable.exists_subset_lt_add is_closed_empty ⟨hs, hμs⟩ hμs hε
lemma _root_.measurable_set.exists_is_closed_diff_lt [opens_measurable_space α]
[weakly_regular μ] ⦃A : set α⦄ (hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ F ⊆ A, is_closed F ∧ μ (A \ F) < ε :=
begin
rcases hA.exists_is_closed_lt_add h'A hε with ⟨F, hFA, hFc, hF⟩,
exact ⟨F, hFA, hFc, measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add hFc.measurable_set hFA
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h'A $ measure_mono hFA) hF⟩
end
/-- Given a weakly regular measure, any measurable set of finite mass can be approximated from
inside by closed sets. -/
lemma _root_.measurable_set.exists_lt_is_closed_of_ne_top [weakly_regular μ]
⦃A : set α⦄ (hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < μ A) :
∃ K ⊆ A, is_closed K ∧ r < μ K :=
inner_regular_measurable ⟨hA, h'A⟩ _ hr
/-- Given a weakly regular measure, any measurable set of finite mass can be approximated from
inside by closed sets. -/
lemma _root_.measurable_set.measure_eq_supr_is_closed_of_ne_top [weakly_regular μ] ⦃A : set α⦄
(hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) :
μ A = (⨆ (K ⊆ A) (h : is_closed K), μ K) :=
inner_regular_measurable.measure_eq_supr ⟨hA, h'A⟩
/-- The restriction of a weakly regular measure to a measurable set of finite measure is
weakly regular. -/
lemma restrict_of_measurable_set [borel_space α] [weakly_regular μ] (A : set α)
(hA : measurable_set A) (h'A : μ A ≠ ∞) : weakly_regular (μ.restrict A) :=
begin
haveI : fact (μ A < ∞) := ⟨h'A.lt_top⟩,
refine inner_regular.weakly_regular_of_finite _ (λ V V_open, _),
simp only [restrict_apply' hA], intros r hr,
have : μ (V ∩ A) ≠ ∞, from ne_top_of_le_ne_top h'A (measure_mono $ inter_subset_right _ _),
rcases (V_open.measurable_set.inter hA).exists_lt_is_closed_of_ne_top this hr
with ⟨F, hFVA, hFc, hF⟩,
refine ⟨F, hFVA.trans (inter_subset_left _ _), hFc, _⟩,
rwa inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (hFVA.trans $ inter_subset_right _ _)
end
/-- Any finite measure on a metric space (or even a pseudo emetric space) is weakly regular. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance of_pseudo_emetric_space_of_is_finite_measure {X : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space X]
[measurable_space X] [borel_space X] (μ : measure X) [is_finite_measure μ] :
weakly_regular μ :=
(inner_regular.of_pseudo_emetric_space μ).weakly_regular_of_finite μ
/-- Any locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact metric space (or even a pseudo emetric space) is
weakly regular. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance of_pseudo_emetric_sigma_compact_space_of_locally_finite {X : Type*}
[pseudo_emetric_space X] [sigma_compact_space X] [measurable_space X] [borel_space X]
(μ : measure X) [is_locally_finite_measure μ] :
weakly_regular μ :=
begin
haveI : outer_regular μ,
{ refine (μ.finite_spanning_sets_in_open.mono' $ λ U hU, _).outer_regular,
haveI : fact (μ U < ∞), from ⟨hU.2⟩,
exact ⟨hU.1, infer_instance⟩ },
exact ⟨inner_regular.of_pseudo_emetric_space μ⟩
end
end weakly_regular
/-- Any locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact (e)metric space is regular. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance regular.of_sigma_compact_space_of_is_locally_finite_measure {X : Type*}
[emetric_space X] [sigma_compact_space X] [measurable_space X] [borel_space X] (μ : measure X)
[is_locally_finite_measure μ] : regular μ :=
{ lt_top_of_is_compact := λ K hK, hK.measure_lt_top,
inner_regular := (inner_regular.is_compact_is_closed μ).trans
(inner_regular.of_pseudo_emetric_space μ) }
end measure
end measure_theory
|
993f8a4ac8b48215f7d337110f5a6a395dc4f948 | e0f9ba56b7fedc16ef8697f6caeef5898b435143 | /src/analysis/special_functions/trigonometric.lean | 69894143625da007d95d93b808abb0fafe1538d4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anrddh/mathlib | 6a374da53c7e3a35cb0298b0cd67824efef362b4 | a4266a01d2dcb10de19369307c986d038c7bb6a6 | refs/heads/master | 1,656,710,827,909 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 264,271,800 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,589,568,062,000 | 1,589,568,061,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 65,906 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import analysis.special_functions.exp_log
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the following definitions:
* π, arcsin, arccos, arctan
* argument of a complex number
* logarithm on complex numbers
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity and differentiability of the usual trigonometric functions are proved, and their
derivatives are computed.
## Tags
log, sin, cos, tan, arcsin, arccos, arctan, angle, argument
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
namespace complex
/-- The complex sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `cos x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_sin (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
begin
simp only [cos, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((((has_deriv_at_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp.sub
((has_deriv_at_id x).mul_const I).cexp).mul_const I).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
simp only [function.comp, id],
rw [sub_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, mul_one, one_mul, mul_assoc,
I_mul_I, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm]
end
lemma differentiable_sin : differentiable ℂ sin :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sin x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sin {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sin x).deriv
lemma continuous_sin : continuous sin :=
differentiable_sin.continuous
/-- The complex cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `-sin x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_cos (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
begin
simp only [sin, div_eq_mul_inv, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul],
convert (((has_deriv_at_id x).mul_const I).cexp.add
((has_deriv_at_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
simp only [function.comp, id],
ring
end
lemma differentiable_cos : differentiable ℂ cos :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cos x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cos {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
lemma deriv_cos {x : ℂ} : deriv cos x = -sin x :=
(has_deriv_at_cos x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos' : deriv cos = (λ x, -sin x) :=
funext $ λ x, deriv_cos
lemma continuous_cos : continuous cos :=
differentiable_cos.continuous
lemma continuous_tan : continuous (λ x : {x // cos x ≠ 0}, tan x) :=
(continuous_sin.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous.inv subtype.property (continuous_cos.comp continuous_subtype_val))
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `sinh x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
begin
simp only [cosh, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((has_deriv_at_exp x).sub (has_deriv_at_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
rw [id, mul_neg_one, neg_neg]
end
lemma differentiable_sinh : differentiable ℂ sinh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sinh {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).deriv
lemma continuous_sinh : continuous sinh :=
differentiable_sinh.continuous
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `cosh x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
begin
simp only [sinh, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((has_deriv_at_exp x).add (has_deriv_at_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
rw [id, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
end
lemma differentiable_cosh : differentiable ℂ cosh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cosh {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).deriv
lemma continuous_cosh : continuous cosh :=
differentiable_cosh.continuous
end complex
section
/-! Register lemmas for the derivatives of the composition of `complex.cos`, `complex.sin`,
`complex.cosh` and `complex.sinh` with a differentiable function, for standalone use and use with
`simp`. -/
variables {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} {s : set ℂ}
/-! `complex.cos`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.ccos (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.ccos (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.ccos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccos.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.ccos (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccos.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.ccos (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).ccos
@[simp] lemma differentiable.ccos (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).ccos
lemma deriv_within_ccos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.cos (f x)) s x = - complex.sin (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccos.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_ccos (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.cos (f x)) x = - complex.sin (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccos.deriv
/-! `complex.sin`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.csin (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.csin (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.csin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csin.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.csin (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csin.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.csin (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).csin
@[simp] lemma differentiable.csin (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).csin
lemma deriv_within_csin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.sin (f x)) s x = complex.cos (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csin.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_csin (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.sin (f x)) x = complex.cos (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csin.deriv
/-! `complex.cosh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.ccosh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.ccosh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.ccosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccosh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.ccosh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccosh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.ccosh (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).ccosh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.ccosh (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).ccosh
lemma deriv_within_ccosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) s x = complex.sinh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccosh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_ccosh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) x = complex.sinh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccosh.deriv
/-! `complex.sinh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.csinh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.csinh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.csinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csinh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.csinh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csinh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.csinh (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).csinh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.csinh (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).csinh
lemma deriv_within_csinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) s x = complex.cosh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csinh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_csinh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) x = complex.cosh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csinh.deriv
end
namespace real
variables {x y z : ℝ}
lemma has_deriv_at_sin (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_sin x)
lemma differentiable_sin : differentiable ℝ sin :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sin x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sin : differentiable_at ℝ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sin x).deriv
lemma continuous_sin : continuous sin :=
differentiable_sin.continuous
lemma has_deriv_at_cos (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
(has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_cos x) : _)
lemma differentiable_cos : differentiable ℝ cos :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cos x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cos : differentiable_at ℝ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
lemma deriv_cos : deriv cos x = - sin x :=
(has_deriv_at_cos x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos' : deriv cos = (λ x, - sin x) :=
funext $ λ _, deriv_cos
lemma continuous_cos : continuous cos :=
differentiable_cos.continuous
lemma continuous_tan : continuous (λ x : {x // cos x ≠ 0}, tan x) :=
by simp only [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]; exact
(continuous_sin.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous.inv subtype.property
(continuous_cos.comp continuous_subtype_val))
lemma has_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_sinh x)
lemma differentiable_sinh : differentiable ℝ sinh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sinh : differentiable_at ℝ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).deriv
lemma continuous_sinh : continuous sinh :=
differentiable_sinh.continuous
lemma has_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
has_deriv_at_real_of_complex (complex.has_deriv_at_cosh x)
lemma differentiable_cosh : differentiable ℝ cosh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cosh : differentiable_at ℝ cosh x :=
differentiable_cosh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).deriv
lemma continuous_cosh : continuous cosh :=
differentiable_cosh.continuous
end real
section
/-! Register lemmas for the derivatives of the composition of `real.exp`, `real.cos`, `real.sin`,
`real.cosh` and `real.sinh` with a differentiable function, for standalone use and use with
`simp`. -/
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' x : ℝ} {s : set ℝ}
/-! `real.cos`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.cos (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cos (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.cos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.cos (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cos.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.cos (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cos.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.cos (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).cos
@[simp] lemma differentiable.cos (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).cos
lemma deriv_within_cos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.cos (f x)) s x = - real.sin (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cos.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.cos (f x)) x = - real.sin (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cos.deriv
/-! `real.sin`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.sin (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.sin (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.sin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.sin (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sin.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sin (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sin.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sin (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).sin
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sin (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).sin
lemma deriv_within_sin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.sin (f x)) s x = real.cos (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sin.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.sin (f x)) x = real.cos (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sin.deriv
/-! `real.cosh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.cosh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cosh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.cosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cosh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.cosh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cosh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.cosh (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).cosh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.cosh (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).cosh
lemma deriv_within_cosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.cosh (f x)) s x = real.sinh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cosh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.cosh (f x)) x = real.sinh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cosh.deriv
/-! `real.sinh`-/
lemma has_deriv_at.sinh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.sinh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.sinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sinh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sinh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sinh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sinh (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).sinh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sinh (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).sinh
lemma deriv_within_sinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.sinh (f x)) s x = real.cosh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sinh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.sinh (f x)) x = real.cosh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sinh.deriv
end
namespace real
lemma exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' set.Icc (1:ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuous_cos.continuous_on
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `data.real.pi`. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ := 2 * classical.some exists_cos_eq_zero
localized "notation `π` := real.pi" in real
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
by rw [pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
lemma one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 :=
by rw [pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
lemma pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 :=
by rw [pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
lemma two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2, by norm_num)).1
(by rw div_self (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _); exact one_le_pi_div_two)
lemma pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2, by norm_num)).1
(calc π / 2 ≤ 2 : pi_div_two_le_two
... = 4 / 2 : by norm_num)
lemma pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
lemma pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
lemma two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π :=
by linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp] lemma sin_pi : sin π = 0 :=
by rw [← mul_div_cancel_left pi (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), two_mul, add_div,
sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp] lemma cos_pi : cos π = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_div_cancel_left pi (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), mul_div_assoc,
cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two];
simp [bit0, pow_add]
@[simp] lemma sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 :=
by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 :=
by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
lemma sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
by simp [sin_add_pi, sin_add, sin_two_pi, cos_two_pi]
lemma cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
by simp [cos_add, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4, from rfl,
have π - x ≤ 2, from sub_le_iff_le_add.2
(le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _)),
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
lemma sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x with
| or.inl h0x := (lt_or_eq_of_le hxp).elim
(le_of_lt ∘ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x)
(λ hpx, by simp [hpx])
| or.inr h0x := by simp [h0x.symm]
end
lemma sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 $ sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
lemma sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 $ sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 :=
by simpa [pow_two, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2),
this.resolve_right
(λ h, (show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1, by norm_num) $
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos))
lemma sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x :=
by rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
lemma cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two
{x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (by linarith) (by linarith)
lemma cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two
{x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le hx₁, lt_or_eq_of_le hx₂ with
| or.inl hx₁, or.inl hx₂ := le_of_lt (cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂)
| or.inl hx₁, or.inr hx₂ := by simp [hx₂]
| or.inr hx₁, _ := by simp [hx₁.symm]
end
lemma cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) : cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 $ cos_pi_sub x ▸
cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith)
lemma cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) : cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 $ cos_pi_sub x ▸
cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith)
lemma sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by induction n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *]
lemma sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *, sin_nat_mul_pi]
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, mul_add, cos_add, add_mul, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by cases n; simp only [cos_nat_mul_two_pi, int.of_nat_eq_coe,
int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, int.cast_coe_nat, int.cast_neg,
(neg_mul_eq_neg_mul _ _).symm, cos_neg]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simp [cos_add, sin_add, cos_int_mul_two_pi]
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) :
sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt (λ h0, lt_irrefl (0 : ℝ) $
calc 0 < sin x : sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂
... = 0 : h))
(le_of_not_gt (λ h0, lt_irrefl (0 : ℝ) $
calc 0 = sin x : h.symm
... < 0 : sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁)),
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨λ h, ⟨⌊x / π⌋, le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 $ le_of_not_gt $ λ h₃, ne_of_lt (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos))
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff (cos x), ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x,
pow_two, pow_two, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self];
exact ⟨λ h, by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ eq.symm⟩
theorem sin_sub_sin (θ ψ : ℝ) : sin θ - sin ψ = 2 * sin((θ - ψ)/2) * cos((θ + ψ)/2) :=
begin
have s1 := sin_add ((θ + ψ) / 2) ((θ - ψ) / 2),
have s2 := sin_sub ((θ + ψ) / 2) ((θ - ψ) / 2),
rw [div_add_div_same, add_sub, add_right_comm, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two] at s1,
rw [div_sub_div_same, ←sub_add, add_sub_cancel', add_self_div_two] at s2,
rw [s1, s2, ←sub_add, add_sub_cancel', ← two_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm]
end
lemma cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (or.inl h)) in
⟨n / 2, (int.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(λ hn0, by rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @int.cast_two ℝ, ← int.cast_mul, int.div_mul_cancel
((int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).2 hn0)])
(λ hn1, by rw [← int.mod_add_div n 2, hn1, int.cast_add, int.cast_one, add_mul,
one_mul, add_comm, mul_comm (2 : ℤ), int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, int.cast_two] at hn;
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h;
exact absurd h (by norm_num))⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℝ} : cos θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = (2 * k + 1) * pi / 2 :=
begin
rw [←real.sin_pi_div_two_sub, sin_eq_zero_iff],
split,
{ rintro ⟨n, hn⟩, existsi -n,
rw [int.cast_neg, add_mul, add_div, mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
one_mul, ←neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, hn, neg_sub, sub_add_cancel] },
{ rintro ⟨n, hn⟩, existsi -n,
rw [hn, add_mul, one_mul, add_div, mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap, sub_self, zero_sub, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, int.cast_neg] }
end
lemma cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) : cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (cos_eq_one_iff x).1 h in
begin
clear _let_match,
subst hn,
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos, ← int.cast_one, int.cast_lt, ← int.le_sub_one_iff, sub_self] at hx₂,
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos, neg_lt,
← int.cast_one, ← int.cast_neg, int.cast_lt, ← int.add_one_le_iff, neg_add_self] at hx₁,
exact mul_eq_zero.2 (or.inl (int.cast_eq_zero.2 (le_antisymm hx₂ hx₁))),
end,
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
theorem cos_sub_cos (θ ψ : ℝ) : cos θ - cos ψ = -2 * sin((θ + ψ)/2) * sin((θ - ψ)/2) :=
by rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, sin_sub_sin, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left,
add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, add_halves, sub_sub, sub_div π, cos_pi_div_two_sub,
← neg_sub, neg_div, sin_neg, ← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_right_comm]
lemma cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2)
(hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
calc cos y = cos x * cos (y - x) - sin x * sin (y - x) :
by rw [← cos_add, add_sub_cancel'_right]
... < (cos x * 1) - sin x * sin (y - x) :
sub_lt_sub_right ((mul_lt_mul_left
(cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (lt_of_lt_of_le (neg_neg_of_pos pi_div_two_pos) hx₁)
(lt_of_lt_of_le hxy hy₂))).2
(lt_of_le_of_ne (cos_le_one _) (mt (cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt
(show -(2 * π) < y - x, by linarith) (show y - x < 2 * π, by linarith)).1
(sub_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_lt hxy).symm)))) _
... ≤ _ : by rw mul_one;
exact sub_le_self _ (mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (by linarith))
(sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (by linarith) (by linarith)))
lemma cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π)
(hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
match (le_total x (π / 2) : x ≤ π / 2 ∨ π / 2 ≤ x), le_total y (π / 2) with
| or.inl hx, or.inl hy := cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two hx₁ hx hy₁ hy hxy
| or.inl hx, or.inr hy := (lt_or_eq_of_le hx).elim
(λ hx, calc cos y ≤ 0 : cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le hy (by linarith [pi_pos])
... < cos x : cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hx)
(λ hx, calc cos y < 0 : cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos])
... = cos x : by rw [hx, cos_pi_div_two])
| or.inr hx, or.inl hy := by linarith
| or.inr hx, or.inr hy := neg_lt_neg_iff.1 (by rw [← cos_pi_sub, ← cos_pi_sub];
apply cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two; linarith)
end
lemma cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π)
(hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) : cos y ≤ cos x :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le hxy).elim
(le_of_lt ∘ cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂)
(λ h, h ▸ le_refl _)
lemma sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) (hy₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y :=
by rw [← cos_sub_pi_div_two, ← cos_sub_pi_div_two, ← cos_neg (x - _), ← cos_neg (y - _)];
apply cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi; linarith
lemma sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) (hy₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le hxy).elim
(le_of_lt ∘ sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂)
(λ h, h ▸ le_refl _)
lemma sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) (hy₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : sin x = sin y) : x = y :=
match lt_trichotomy x y with
| or.inl h := absurd (sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
| or.inr (or.inl h) := h
| or.inr (or.inr h) := absurd (sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two hy₁ hy₂ hx₁ hx₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
end
lemma cos_inj_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) (hy₁ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ π)
(hxy : cos x = cos y) : x = y :=
begin
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub] at hxy,
refine (sub_right_inj).1 (sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two _ _ _ _ hxy);
linarith
end
lemma exists_sin_eq : set.Icc (-1:ℝ) 1 ⊆ sin '' set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
by convert intermediate_value_Icc
(le_trans (neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)) (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos))
continuous_sin.continuous_on; simp only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
lemma sin_lt {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) : sin x < x :=
begin
cases le_or_gt x 1 with h' h',
{ have hx : abs x = x := abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h),
have : abs x ≤ 1, rwa [hx],
have := sin_bound this, rw [abs_le] at this,
have := this.2, rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', hx] at this,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt this, rw [sub_add], apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (le_of_eq (sub_zero x)),
apply sub_lt_sub_left, rw sub_pos, apply mul_lt_mul',
{ rw [pow_succ x 3], refine le_trans _ (le_of_eq (one_mul _)),
rw mul_le_mul_right, exact h', apply pow_pos h },
norm_num, norm_num, apply pow_pos h },
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (sin_le_one x) h'
end
/- note 1: this inequality is not tight, the tighter inequality is sin x > x - x ^ 3 / 6.
note 2: this is also true for x > 1, but it's nontrivial for x just above 1. -/
lemma sin_gt_sub_cube {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (h' : x ≤ 1) : x - x ^ 3 / 4 < sin x :=
begin
have hx : abs x = x := abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h),
have : abs x ≤ 1, rwa [hx],
have := sin_bound this, rw [abs_le] at this,
have := this.1, rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, hx] at this,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ this,
rw [add_comm, sub_add, sub_neg_eq_add], apply sub_lt_sub_left,
apply add_lt_of_lt_sub_left,
rw (show x ^ 3 / 4 - x ^ 3 / 6 = x ^ 3 / 12,
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, (mul_sub _ _ _).symm, -sub_eq_add_neg]; congr; norm_num),
apply mul_lt_mul',
{ rw [pow_succ x 3], refine le_trans _ (le_of_eq (one_mul _)),
rw mul_le_mul_right, exact h', apply pow_pos h },
norm_num, norm_num, apply pow_pos h
end
/-- The type of angles -/
def angle : Type :=
quotient_add_group.quotient (gmultiples (2 * π))
namespace angle
instance angle.add_comm_group : add_comm_group angle :=
quotient_add_group.add_comm_group _
instance : inhabited angle := ⟨0⟩
instance angle.has_coe : has_coe ℝ angle :=
⟨quotient.mk'⟩
instance angle.is_add_group_hom : @is_add_group_hom ℝ angle _ _ (coe : ℝ → angle) :=
@quotient_add_group.is_add_group_hom _ _ _ (normal_add_subgroup_of_add_comm_group _)
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
↑(add_monoid.smul n x : ℝ) = add_monoid.smul n (↑x : angle) :=
add_monoid_hom.map_smul ⟨coe, coe_zero, coe_add⟩ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_gsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑(gsmul n x : ℝ) = gsmul n (↑x : angle) :=
add_monoid_hom.map_gsmul ⟨coe, coe_zero, coe_add⟩ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : angle) :=
quotient.sound' ⟨-1, by dsimp only; rw [neg_one_gsmul, add_zero]⟩
lemma angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k :=
by simp only [quotient_add_group.eq, gmultiples, set.mem_range, gsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : angle) = -ψ :=
begin
split,
{ intro Hcos,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero, eq_false_intro two_ne_zero,
false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos,
rcases Hcos with ⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩,
{ right,
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn,
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc,
← gsmul_eq_mul, coe_gsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, gsmul_zero] },
{ left,
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn,
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc,
← gsmul_eq_mul, coe_gsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, gsmul_zero, zero_add] } },
{ rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub],
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩),
rw [← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero],
rw [←sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul] }
end
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : angle) + ψ = π :=
begin
split,
{ intro Hsin, rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin,
cases cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h,
{ left, rw coe_sub at h, exact sub_right_inj.1 h },
right, rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub,
sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add, add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h,
exact h.symm },
{ rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ←eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ←coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub],
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩),
rw [← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul],
have H' : θ + ψ = (2 * k) * π + π := by rwa [←sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add,
mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←mul_assoc] at H,
rw [← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _),
cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero, mul_zero] }
end
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : angle) = ψ :=
begin
cases cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc, { exact hc },
cases sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs, { exact hs },
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc,
cases quotient.exact' hc with n hn, dsimp only at hn,
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero_iff_eq, gsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul,
mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add,
← int.cast_zero, ← int.cast_one, ← int.cast_bit0, ← int.cast_mul, ← int.cast_add, int.cast_inj] at hn,
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2:ℤ) = 0 % (2:ℤ) := congr_arg (%(2:ℤ)) hn,
rw [add_comm, int.add_mul_mod_self] at this,
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
end
end angle
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x` and `arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
If the argument is not between `-1` and `1` it defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arcsin (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1 then classical.some (exists_sin_eq hx) else 0
lemma arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
if hx : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1
then by rw [arcsin, dif_pos hx]; exact (classical.some_spec (exists_sin_eq hx)).1.2
else by rw [arcsin, dif_neg hx]; exact le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos
lemma neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
if hx : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1
then by rw [arcsin, dif_pos hx]; exact (classical.some_spec (exists_sin_eq hx)).1.1
else by rw [arcsin, dif_neg hx]; exact neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)
lemma sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
by rw [arcsin, dif_pos (and.intro hx₁ hx₂)];
exact (classical.some_spec (exists_sin_eq ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩)).2
lemma arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _) (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _) hx₁ hx₂
(by rw sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _))
lemma arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1)
(hxy : arcsin x = arcsin y) : x = y :=
by rw [← sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂, ← sin_arcsin hy₁ hy₂, hxy]
@[simp] lemma arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos))
(le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)
(by rw [sin_arcsin, sin_zero]; norm_num)
@[simp] lemma arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(by linarith [pi_pos])
(le_refl _)
(by rw [sin_arcsin, sin_pi_div_two]; norm_num)
@[simp] lemma arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x :=
if h : -1 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1 then
have -1 ≤ -x ∧ -x ≤ 1, by rwa [neg_le_neg_iff, neg_le, and.comm],
sin_inj_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _))
(neg_le.1 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _))
(by rw [sin_arcsin this.1 this.2, sin_neg, sin_arcsin h.1 h.2])
else
have ¬(-1 ≤ -x ∧ -x ≤ 1) := by rwa [neg_le_neg_iff, neg_le, and.comm],
by rw [arcsin, arcsin, dif_neg h, dif_neg this, neg_zero]
@[simp] lemma arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) := by simp
lemma arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ arcsin x :=
if hx₁ : x ≤ 1 then
not_lt.1 (λ h, not_lt.2 hx begin
have := sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _) (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(neg_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos)) (le_of_lt pi_div_two_pos) h,
rw [real.sin_arcsin, sin_zero] at this; linarith
end)
else by rw [arcsin, dif_neg]; simp [hx₁]
lemma arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, have sin (arcsin x) = 0, by simp [h],
by rwa [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂] at this,
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 < x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : 0 < arcsin x :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (arcsin_nonneg (le_of_lt hx₁))
(ne.symm (mt (arcsin_eq_zero_iff (by linarith) hx₂).1 (ne_of_lt hx₁).symm))
lemma arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : arcsin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx))
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
If the argument is not between `-1` and `1` it defaults to `π / 2` -/
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
lemma arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x := rfl
lemma arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arccos]
lemma arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π :=
by unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
lemma arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x :=
by unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
lemma cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x :=
by rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
lemma arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x :=
by rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin]; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; linarith
lemma arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1)
(hxy : arccos x = arccos y) : x = y :=
arcsin_inj hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂ $ by simp [arccos, *] at *
@[simp] lemma arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp] lemma arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp] lemma arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
lemma arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x :=
by rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self]; simp
lemma cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _) (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
lemma cos_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arcsin x) = sqrt (1 - x ^ 2) :=
have sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x),
begin
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (pow_two_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))),
pow_two, sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this,
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂],
end
lemma sin_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arccos x) = sqrt (1 - x ^ 2) :=
by rw [arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
lemma abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt (x : ℝ) : abs (x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2)) < 1 :=
have h₁ : 0 < 1 + x ^ 2, from add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (pow_two_nonneg _),
have h₂ : 0 < sqrt (1 + x ^ 2), from sqrt_pos.2 h₁,
by rw [abs_div, div_lt_iff (abs_pos_of_pos h₂), one_mul,
mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg x) (abs_nonneg _),
← abs_mul, ← abs_mul, mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg zero_le_one (pow_two_nonneg _)),
abs_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg x), abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h₁), pow_two, add_comm];
exact lt_add_one _
lemma div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one (x : ℝ) : x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) < 1 :=
(abs_lt.1 (abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _)).2
lemma neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add (x : ℝ) : -1 < x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) :=
(abs_lt.1 (abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _)).1
lemma tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x :=
by rw tan_eq_sin_div_cos; exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith))
(cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hxp)
lemma tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| or.inl hx0, or.inl hxp := le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| or.inl hx0, or.inr hxp := by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| or.inr hx0, _ := by simp [hx0.symm]
end
lemma tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
lemma tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) : tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
lemma tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) (hy₁ : 0 ≤ y)
(hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
begin
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos],
exact div_lt_div
(sin_lt_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (le_of_lt hx₂)
(by linarith) (le_of_lt hy₂) hxy)
(cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (by linarith) hy₁ (by linarith) (le_of_lt hxy))
(sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hy₁ (by linarith))
(cos_pos_of_neg_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂)
end
lemma tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
match le_total x 0, le_total y 0 with
| or.inl hx0, or.inl hy0 := neg_lt_neg_iff.1 $ by rw [← tan_neg, ← tan_neg]; exact
tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two (neg_nonneg.2 hy0) (neg_lt.2 hy₁)
(neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_lt.2 hx₁) (neg_lt_neg hxy)
| or.inl hx0, or.inr hy0 := (lt_or_eq_of_le hy0).elim
(λ hy0, calc tan x ≤ 0 : tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le hx0 (le_of_lt hx₁)
... < tan y : tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hy0 hy₂)
(λ hy0, by rw [← hy0, tan_zero]; exact
tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt (hy0.symm ▸ hxy) hx₁)
| or.inr hx0, or.inl hy0 := by linarith
| or.inr hx0, or.inr hy0 := tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hx₂ hy0 hy₂ hxy
end
lemma tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
match lt_trichotomy x y with
| or.inl h := absurd (tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hy₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
| or.inr (or.inl h) := h
| or.inr (or.inr h) := absurd (tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two hy₁ hy₂ hx₁ hx₂ h) (by rw hxy; exact lt_irrefl _)
end
/-- Inverse of the `tan` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 < arctan x` and `arctan x < π / 2` -/
noncomputable def arctan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
arcsin (x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2))
lemma sin_arctan (x : ℝ) : sin (arctan x) = x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) :=
sin_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _)) (le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _))
lemma cos_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) = 1 / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2) :=
have h₁ : (0 : ℝ) < 1 + x ^ 2,
from add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (pow_two_nonneg _),
have h₂ : (x / sqrt (1 + x ^ 2)) ^ 2 < 1,
by rw [pow_two, ← abs_mul_self, _root_.abs_mul];
exact mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_left (abs_nonneg _)
(abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _) (le_of_lt (abs_div_sqrt_one_add_lt _)),
by rw [arctan, cos_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _)) (le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _)),
one_div_eq_inv, ← sqrt_inv, sqrt_inj (sub_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt h₂)) (inv_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt h₁)),
div_pow, pow_two (sqrt _), mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt h₁),
← domain.mul_right_inj (ne.symm (ne_of_lt h₁)), mul_sub,
mul_div_cancel' _ (ne.symm (ne_of_lt h₁)), mul_inv_cancel (ne.symm (ne_of_lt h₁))];
simp
lemma tan_arctan (x : ℝ) : tan (arctan x) = x :=
by rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arctan, cos_arctan, div_div_div_div_eq, mul_one,
mul_div_assoc,
div_self (mt sqrt_eq_zero'.1 (not_le_of_gt (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (pow_two_nonneg x)))),
mul_one]
lemma arctan_lt_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arctan x < π / 2 :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(λ h, ne_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one x) $
by rw [← sin_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _))
(le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _)), ← arctan, h, sin_pi_div_two])
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) < arctan x :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
(λ h, ne_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add x) $
by rw [← sin_arcsin (le_of_lt (neg_one_lt_div_sqrt_one_add _))
(le_of_lt (div_sqrt_one_add_lt_one _)), ← arctan, ← h, sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two])
lemma tan_surjective : function.surjective tan :=
function.surjective_of_has_right_inverse ⟨_, tan_arctan⟩
lemma arctan_tan {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : arctan (tan x) = x :=
tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan _)
(arctan_lt_pi_div_two _) hx₁ hx₂ (by rw tan_arctan)
@[simp] lemma arctan_zero : arctan 0 = 0 :=
by simp [arctan]
@[simp] lemma arctan_neg (x : ℝ) : arctan (-x) = - arctan x :=
by simp [arctan, neg_div]
end real
namespace complex
open_locale real
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re
then real.arcsin (x.im / x.abs)
else if 0 ≤ x.im
then real.arcsin ((-x).im / x.abs) + π
else real.arcsin ((-x).im / x.abs) - π
lemma arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
if hx₁ : 0 ≤ x.re
then by rw [arg, if_pos hx₁];
exact le_trans (real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _) (le_of_lt (half_lt_self real.pi_pos))
else
have hx : x ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hx₁,
if hx₂ : 0 ≤ x.im
then by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_pos hx₂];
exact le_sub_iff_add_le.1 (by rw sub_self;
exact real.arcsin_nonpos (by rw [neg_im, neg_div, neg_nonpos]; exact div_nonneg hx₂ (abs_pos.2 hx)))
else by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_neg hx₂];
exact sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans (real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
(by linarith [real.pi_pos]))
lemma neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
if hx₁ : 0 ≤ x.re
then by rw [arg, if_pos hx₁];
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (neg_lt_neg (half_lt_self real.pi_pos)) (real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)
else
have hx : x ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hx₁,
if hx₂ : 0 ≤ x.im
then by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_pos hx₂];
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith [real.pi_pos]) (real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _))
else by rw [arg, if_neg hx₁, if_neg hx₂];
exact lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 (by rw neg_add_self;
exact real.arcsin_pos (by rw [neg_im]; exact div_pos (neg_pos.2 (lt_of_not_ge hx₂))
(abs_pos.2 hx)) (by rw [← abs_neg x]; exact (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one _)).2))
lemma arg_eq_arg_neg_add_pi_of_im_nonneg_of_re_neg {x : ℂ} (hxr : x.re < 0) (hxi : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = arg (-x) + π :=
have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos],
by rw [arg, arg, if_neg (not_le.2 hxr), if_pos this, if_pos hxi, abs_neg]
lemma arg_eq_arg_neg_sub_pi_of_im_neg_of_re_neg {x : ℂ} (hxr : x.re < 0) (hxi : x.im < 0) :
arg x = arg (-x) - π :=
have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos],
by rw [arg, arg, if_neg (not_le.2 hxr), if_neg (not_le.2 hxi), if_pos this, abs_neg]
@[simp] lemma arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 :=
by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 :=
by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
@[simp] lemma arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π :=
by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (@zero_lt_one ℝ _)]
@[simp] lemma arg_I : arg I = π / 2 :=
by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp] lemma arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) :=
by simp [arg, le_refl]
lemma sin_arg (x : ℂ) : real.sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs :=
by unfold arg; split_ifs;
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2, real.sin_add, neg_div, real.arcsin_neg,
real.sin_neg]
private lemma cos_arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxr : 0 ≤ x.re) : real.cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs :=
have 0 ≤ 1 - (x.im / abs x) ^ 2,
from sub_nonneg.2 $ by rw [pow_two, ← _root_.abs_mul_self, _root_.abs_mul, ← pow_two];
exact pow_le_one _ (_root_.abs_nonneg _) (abs_im_div_abs_le_one _),
by rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx), ← real.mul_self_sqrt (abs_nonneg x),
arg, if_pos hxr, real.cos_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2, ← real.sqrt_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← real.sqrt_mul this,
sub_mul, div_pow, ← pow_two, div_mul_cancel _ (pow_ne_zero 2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)),
one_mul, pow_two, mul_self_abs, norm_sq, pow_two, add_sub_cancel, real.sqrt_mul_self hxr]
lemma cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : real.cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs :=
if hxr : 0 ≤ x.re then cos_arg_of_re_nonneg hx hxr
else
have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos] using hxr,
if hxi : 0 ≤ x.im
then have 0 ≤ (-x).re, from le_of_lt $ by simpa [neg_pos] using hxr,
by rw [arg_eq_arg_neg_add_pi_of_im_nonneg_of_re_neg (not_le.1 hxr) hxi, real.cos_add_pi,
cos_arg_of_re_nonneg (neg_ne_zero.2 hx) this];
simp [neg_div]
else by rw [arg_eq_arg_neg_sub_pi_of_im_neg_of_re_neg (not_le.1 hxr) (not_le.1 hxi)];
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, real.cos_add, neg_div, cos_arg_of_re_nonneg (neg_ne_zero.2 hx) this]
lemma tan_arg {x : ℂ} : real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re :=
begin
by_cases h : x = 0,
{ simp only [h, euclidean_domain.zero_div,
complex.zero_im, complex.arg_zero, real.tan_zero, complex.zero_re] },
rw [real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right' _ (mt abs_eq_zero.1 h)]
end
lemma arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) :
arg (cos x + sin x * I) = x :=
if hx₃ : -(π / 2) ≤ x ∧ x ≤ π / 2
then
have hx₄ : 0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).re,
by simp; exact real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le_pi_div_two hx₃.1 hx₃.2,
by rw [arg, if_pos hx₄];
simp [abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, sin_of_real_re, real.arcsin_sin hx₃.1 hx₃.2]
else if hx₄ : x < -(π / 2)
then
have hx₅ : ¬0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).re :=
suffices ¬ 0 ≤ real.cos x, by simpa,
not_le.2 $ by rw ← real.cos_neg;
apply real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt; linarith,
have hx₆ : ¬0 ≤ (cos ↑x + sin ↑x * I).im :=
suffices real.sin x < 0, by simpa,
by apply real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt; linarith,
suffices -π + -real.arcsin (real.sin x) = x,
by rw [arg, if_neg hx₅, if_neg hx₆];
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, sin_of_real_re],
by rw [← real.arcsin_neg, ← real.sin_add_pi, real.arcsin_sin]; try {simp [add_left_comm]}; linarith
else
have hx₅ : π / 2 < x, by cases not_and_distrib.1 hx₃; linarith,
have hx₆ : ¬0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).re :=
suffices ¬0 ≤ real.cos x, by simpa,
not_le.2 $ by apply real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt; linarith,
have hx₇ : 0 ≤ (cos x + sin x * I).im :=
suffices 0 ≤ real.sin x, by simpa,
by apply real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi; linarith,
suffices π - real.arcsin (real.sin x) = x,
by rw [arg, if_neg hx₆, if_pos hx₇];
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, sin_of_real_re],
by rw [← real.sin_pi_sub, real.arcsin_sin]; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; linarith
lemma arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y :=
have hax : abs x ≠ 0, from (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx),
have hay : abs y ≠ 0, from (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hy),
⟨λ h,
begin
have hcos := congr_arg real.cos h,
rw [cos_arg hx, cos_arg hy, div_eq_div_iff hax hay] at hcos,
have hsin := congr_arg real.sin h,
rw [sin_arg, sin_arg, div_eq_div_iff hax hay] at hsin,
apply complex.ext,
{ rw [mul_re, ← of_real_div, of_real_re, of_real_im, zero_mul, sub_zero, mul_comm,
← mul_div_assoc, hcos, mul_div_cancel _ hax] },
{ rw [mul_im, ← of_real_div, of_real_re, of_real_im, zero_mul, add_zero,
mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, hsin, mul_div_cancel _ hax] }
end,
λ h,
have hre : abs (y / x) * x.re = y.re,
by rw ← of_real_div at h;
simpa [-of_real_div] using congr_arg re h,
have hre' : abs (x / y) * y.re = x.re,
by rw [← hre, abs_div, abs_div, ← mul_assoc, div_mul_div,
mul_comm (abs _), div_self (mul_ne_zero hay hax), one_mul],
have him : abs (y / x) * x.im = y.im,
by rw ← of_real_div at h;
simpa [-of_real_div] using congr_arg im h,
have him' : abs (x / y) * y.im = x.im,
by rw [← him, abs_div, abs_div, ← mul_assoc, div_mul_div,
mul_comm (abs _), div_self (mul_ne_zero hay hax), one_mul],
have hxya : x.im / abs x = y.im / abs y,
by rw [← him, abs_div, mul_comm, ← mul_div_comm, mul_div_cancel_left _ hay],
have hnxya : (-x).im / abs x = (-y).im / abs y,
by rw [neg_im, neg_im, neg_div, neg_div, hxya],
if hxr : 0 ≤ x.re
then
have hyr : 0 ≤ y.re, from hre ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hxr,
by simp [arg, *] at *
else
have hyr : ¬ 0 ≤ y.re, from λ hyr, hxr $ hre' ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hyr,
if hxi : 0 ≤ x.im
then
have hyi : 0 ≤ y.im, from him ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hxi,
by simp [arg, *] at *
else
have hyi : ¬ 0 ≤ y.im, from λ hyi, hxi $ him' ▸ mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) hyi,
by simp [arg, *] at *⟩
lemma arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx]
else (arg_eq_arg_iff (mul_ne_zero (of_real_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_lt hr).symm) hx) hx).2 $
by rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), ← mul_assoc,
of_real_mul, mul_comm (r : ℂ), ← div_div_eq_div_mul,
div_mul_cancel _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_lt hr).symm),
div_self (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)), one_mul]
lemma ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : x.abs = y.abs) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y :=
if hy : y = 0 then by simp * at *
else have hx : x ≠ 0, from λ hx, by simp [*, eq_comm] at *,
by rwa [arg_eq_arg_iff hx hy, h₁, div_self (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hy)), one_mul] at h₂
lemma arg_of_real_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 :=
by simp [arg, hx]
lemma arg_of_real_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
by rw [arg_eq_arg_neg_add_pi_of_im_nonneg_of_re_neg, ← of_real_neg, arg_of_real_of_nonneg];
simp [*, le_iff_eq_or_lt, lt_neg]
/-- Inverse of the `exp` function. Returns values such that `(log x).im > - π` and `(log x).im ≤ π`.
`log 0 = 0`-/
noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ := x.abs.log + arg x * I
lemma log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
lemma log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by simp [log]
lemma exp_log {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = x :=
by rw [log, exp_add_mul_I, ← of_real_sin, sin_arg, ← of_real_cos, cos_arg hx,
← of_real_exp, real.exp_log (abs_pos.2 hx), mul_add, of_real_div, of_real_div,
mul_div_cancel' _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)), ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel' _ (of_real_ne_zero.2 (mt abs_eq_zero.1 hx)), re_add_im]
lemma exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi {x y : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π)
(hy₁ : - π < y.im) (hy₂ : y.im ≤ π) (hxy : exp x = exp y) : x = y :=
by rw [exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos y] at hxy;
exact complex.ext
(real.exp_injective $
by simpa [abs_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg complex.abs hxy)
(by simpa [(of_real_exp _).symm, - of_real_exp, arg_real_mul _ (real.exp_pos _),
arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx₁ hx₂, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hy₁ hy₂] using congr_arg arg hxy)
lemma log_exp {x : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂: x.im ≤ π) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi
(by rw log_im; exact neg_pi_lt_arg _)
(by rw log_im; exact arg_le_pi _)
hx₁ hx₂ (by rw [exp_log (exp_ne_zero _)])
lemma of_real_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (x.log : ℂ) = log x :=
complex.ext
(by rw [log_re, of_real_re, abs_of_nonneg hx])
(by rw [of_real_im, log_im, arg_of_real_of_nonneg hx])
lemma log_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (log (x : ℂ)).re = real.log x := by simp [log_re]
@[simp] lemma log_zero : log 0 = 0 := by simp [log]
@[simp] lemma log_one : log 1 = 0 := by simp [log]
lemma log_neg_one : log (-1) = π * I := by simp [log]
lemma log_I : log I = π / 2 * I := by simp [log]
lemma log_neg_I : log (-I) = -(π / 2) * I := by simp [log]
lemma exp_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : exp x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = n * ((2 * π) * I) :=
have real.exp (x.re) * real.cos (x.im) = 1 → real.cos x.im ≠ -1,
from λ h₁ h₂, begin
rw [h₂, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm, mul_one, neg_eq_iff_neg_eq] at h₁,
have := real.exp_pos x.re,
rw ← h₁ at this,
exact absurd this (by norm_num)
end,
calc exp x = 1 ↔ (exp x).re = 1 ∧ (exp x).im = 0 : by simp [complex.ext_iff]
... ↔ real.cos x.im = 1 ∧ real.sin x.im = 0 ∧ x.re = 0 :
begin
rw exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos,
simp [complex.ext_iff, cos_of_real_re, sin_of_real_re, exp_of_real_re,
real.exp_ne_zero],
split; finish [real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq]
end
... ↔ (∃ n : ℤ, ↑n * (2 * π) = x.im) ∧ (∃ n : ℤ, ↑n * π = x.im) ∧ x.re = 0 :
by rw [real.sin_eq_zero_iff, real.cos_eq_one_iff]
... ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = n * ((2 * π) * I) :
⟨λ ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, h⟩, ⟨n, by simp [complex.ext_iff, hn.symm, h]⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, ⟨⟨n, by simp [hn]⟩, ⟨2 * n, by simp [hn, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]⟩,
by simp [hn]⟩⟩
lemma exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ exp (x - y) = 1 :=
by rw [exp_sub, div_eq_one_iff_eq _ (exp_ne_zero _)]
lemma exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = y + n * ((2 * π) * I) :=
by simp only [exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one, exp_eq_one_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
calc cos (π / 2) = real.cos (π / 2) : by rw [of_real_cos]; simp
... = 0 : by simp
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
calc sin (π / 2) = real.sin (π / 2) : by rw [of_real_sin]; simp
... = 1 : by simp
@[simp] lemma sin_pi : sin π = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_sin, real.sin_pi]; simp
@[simp] lemma cos_pi : cos π = -1 :=
by rw [← of_real_cos, real.cos_pi]; simp
@[simp] lemma sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 :=
by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 :=
by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
lemma sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
by simp [sin_add_pi, sin_add, sin_two_pi, cos_two_pi]
lemma cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
by simp [cos_add, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x :=
by rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
lemma sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by induction n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *]
lemma sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [add_mul, sin_add, *, sin_nat_mul_pi]
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, mul_add, cos_add, add_mul, cos_two_pi, sin_two_pi]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
by cases n; simp only [cos_nat_mul_two_pi, int.of_nat_eq_coe,
int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, int.cast_coe_nat, int.cast_neg,
(neg_mul_eq_neg_mul _ _).symm, cos_neg]
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simp [cos_add, sin_add, cos_int_mul_two_pi]
end complex
|
ee10cbab94ec2e917c89ab27682a3bc9f835d2a3 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/order/filter/bases.lean | ec89de1f6f70fd351a959780580d6c70f4f8b579 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,167 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury Kudryashov, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import order.filter.basic
import data.set.countable
/-!
# Filter bases
A filter basis `B : filter_basis α` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element of
the collection. Compared to filters, filter bases do not require that any set containing
an element of `B` belongs to `B`.
A filter basis `B` can be used to construct `B.filter : filter α` such that a set belongs
to `B.filter` if and only if it contains an element of `B`.
Given an indexing type `ι`, a predicate `p : ι → Prop`, and a map `s : ι → set α`,
the proposition `h : filter.is_basis p s` makes sure the range of `s` bounded by `p`
(ie. `s '' set_of p`) defines a filter basis `h.filter_basis`.
If one already has a filter `l` on `α`, `filter.has_basis l p s` (where `p : ι → Prop`
and `s : ι → set α` as above) means that a set belongs to `l` if and
only if it contains some `s i` with `p i`. It implies `h : filter.is_basis p s`, and
`l = h.filter_basis.filter`. The point of this definition is that checking statements
involving elements of `l` often reduces to checking them on the basis elements.
We define a function `has_basis.index (h : filter.has_basis l p s) (t) (ht : t ∈ l)` that returns
some index `i` such that `p i` and `s i ⊆ t`. This function can be useful to avoid manual
destruction of `h.mem_iff.mpr ht` using `cases` or `let`.
This file also introduces more restricted classes of bases, involving monotonicity or
countability. In particular, for `l : filter α`, `l.is_countably_generated` means
there is a countable set of sets which generates `s`. This is reformulated in term of bases,
and consequences are derived.
## Main statements
* `has_basis.mem_iff`, `has_basis.mem_of_superset`, `has_basis.mem_of_mem` : restate `t ∈ f` in terms
of a basis;
* `basis_sets` : all sets of a filter form a basis;
* `has_basis.inf`, `has_basis.inf_principal`, `has_basis.prod`, `has_basis.prod_self`,
`has_basis.map`, `has_basis.comap` : combinators to construct filters of `l ⊓ l'`,
`l ⊓ 𝓟 t`, `l ×ᶠ l'`, `l ×ᶠ l`, `l.map f`, `l.comap f` respectively;
* `has_basis.le_iff`, `has_basis.ge_iff`, has_basis.le_basis_iff` : restate `l ≤ l'` in terms
of bases.
* `has_basis.tendsto_right_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_left_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_iff` : restate
`tendsto f l l'` in terms of bases.
* `is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antimono_basis` : proves a filter is
countably generated if and only if it admis a basis parametrized by a
decreasing sequence of sets indexed by `ℕ`.
* `tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto ` : an abstract version of "sequentially continuous implies continuous".
## Implementation notes
As with `Union`/`bUnion`/`sUnion`, there are three different approaches to filter bases:
* `has_basis l s`, `s : set (set α)`;
* `has_basis l s`, `s : ι → set α`;
* `has_basis l p s`, `p : ι → Prop`, `s : ι → set α`.
We use the latter one because, e.g., `𝓝 x` in an `emetric_space` or in a `metric_space` has a basis
of this form. The other two can be emulated using `s = id` or `p = λ _, true`.
With this approach sometimes one needs to `simp` the statement provided by the `has_basis`
machinery, e.g., `simp only [exists_prop, true_and]` or `simp only [forall_const]` can help
with the case `p = λ _, true`.
-/
open set filter
open_locale filter classical
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*}
/-- A filter basis `B` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element
of the collection. -/
structure filter_basis (α : Type*) :=
(sets : set (set α))
(nonempty : sets.nonempty)
(inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → ∃ z ∈ sets, z ⊆ x ∩ y)
instance filter_basis.nonempty_sets (B : filter_basis α) : nonempty B.sets := B.nonempty.to_subtype
/-- If `B` is a filter basis on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ B` as on paper. -/
@[reducible]
instance {α : Type*}: has_mem (set α) (filter_basis α) := ⟨λ U B, U ∈ B.sets⟩
-- For illustration purposes, the filter basis defining (at_top : filter ℕ)
instance : inhabited (filter_basis ℕ) :=
⟨{ sets := range Ici,
nonempty := ⟨Ici 0, mem_range_self 0⟩,
inter_sets := begin
rintros _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨Ici (max n m), mem_range_self _, _⟩,
rintros p p_in,
split ; rw mem_Ici at *,
exact le_of_max_le_left p_in,
exact le_of_max_le_right p_in,
end }⟩
/-- `is_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a filter basis. -/
protected structure filter.is_basis (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) : Prop :=
(nonempty : ∃ i, p i)
(inter : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → ∃ k, p k ∧ s k ⊆ s i ∩ s j)
namespace filter
namespace is_basis
/-- Constructs a filter basis from an indexed family of sets satisfying `is_basis`. -/
protected def filter_basis {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : is_basis p s) : filter_basis α :=
{ sets := s '' set_of p,
nonempty := let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.nonempty in ⟨s i, mem_image_of_mem s hi⟩,
inter_sets := by { rintros _ _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩,
rcases h.inter hi hj with ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩,
exact ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem s hk, hk'⟩ } }
variables {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : is_basis p s)
lemma mem_filter_basis_iff {U : set α} : U ∈ h.filter_basis ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U :=
iff.rfl
end is_basis
end filter
namespace filter_basis
/-- The filter associated to a filter basis. -/
protected def filter (B : filter_basis α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ s},
univ_sets := let ⟨s, s_in⟩ := B.nonempty in ⟨s, s_in, s.subset_univ⟩,
sets_of_superset := λ x y ⟨s, s_in, h⟩ hxy, ⟨s, s_in, set.subset.trans h hxy⟩,
inter_sets := λ x y ⟨s, s_in, hs⟩ ⟨t, t_in, ht⟩,
let ⟨u, u_in, u_sub⟩ := B.inter_sets s_in t_in in
⟨u, u_in, set.subset.trans u_sub $ set.inter_subset_inter hs ht⟩ }
lemma mem_filter_iff (B : filter_basis α) {U : set α} : U ∈ B.filter ↔ ∃ s ∈ B, s ⊆ U :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_filter_of_mem (B : filter_basis α) {U : set α} : U ∈ B → U ∈ B.filter:=
λ U_in, ⟨U, U_in, subset.refl _⟩
lemma eq_infi_principal (B : filter_basis α) : B.filter = ⨅ s : B.sets, 𝓟 s :=
begin
have : directed (≥) (λ (s : B.sets), 𝓟 (s : set α)),
{ rintros ⟨U, U_in⟩ ⟨V, V_in⟩,
rcases B.inter_sets U_in V_in with ⟨W, W_in, W_sub⟩,
use [W, W_in],
finish },
ext U,
simp [mem_filter_iff, mem_infi this]
end
protected lemma generate (B : filter_basis α) : generate B.sets = B.filter :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros U U_in,
rcases B.mem_filter_iff.mp U_in with ⟨V, V_in, h⟩,
exact generate_sets.superset (generate_sets.basic V_in) h },
{ rw sets_iff_generate,
apply mem_filter_of_mem }
end
end filter_basis
namespace filter
namespace is_basis
variables {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
/-- Constructs a filter from an indexed family of sets satisfying `is_basis`. -/
protected def filter (h : is_basis p s) : filter α := h.filter_basis.filter
protected lemma mem_filter_iff (h : is_basis p s) {U : set α} :
U ∈ h.filter ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ U :=
begin
erw [h.filter_basis.mem_filter_iff],
simp only [mem_filter_basis_iff h, exists_prop],
split,
{ rintros ⟨_, ⟨i, pi, rfl⟩, h⟩,
tauto },
{ tauto }
end
lemma filter_eq_generate (h : is_basis p s) : h.filter = generate {U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U} :=
by erw h.filter_basis.generate ; refl
end is_basis
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`. -/
protected structure has_basis (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) : Prop :=
(mem_iff' : ∀ (t : set α), t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t)
section same_type
variables {l l' : filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} {i : ι}
{p' : ι' → Prop} {s' : ι' → set α} {i' : ι'}
lemma has_basis_generate (s : set (set α)) :
(generate s).has_basis (λ t, finite t ∧ t ⊆ s) (λ t, ⋂₀ t) :=
⟨begin
intro U,
rw mem_generate_iff,
apply exists_congr,
tauto
end⟩
/-- The smallest filter basis containing a given collection of sets. -/
def filter_basis.of_sets (s : set (set α)) : filter_basis α :=
{ sets := sInter '' { t | finite t ∧ t ⊆ s},
nonempty := ⟨univ, ∅, ⟨⟨finite_empty, empty_subset s⟩, sInter_empty⟩⟩,
inter_sets := begin
rintros _ _ ⟨a, ⟨fina, suba⟩, rfl⟩ ⟨b, ⟨finb, subb⟩, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨⋂₀ (a ∪ b), mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨fina.union finb, union_subset suba subb⟩,
by rw sInter_union⟩,
end }
/-- Definition of `has_basis` unfolded with implicit set argument. -/
lemma has_basis.mem_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
hl.mem_iff' t
lemma has_basis_iff : l.has_basis p s ↔ ∀ t, t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, h, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma has_basis.ex_mem (h : l.has_basis p s) : ∃ i, p i :=
let ⟨i, pi, h⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp univ_mem_sets in ⟨i, pi⟩
protected lemma is_basis.has_basis (h : is_basis p s) : has_basis h.filter p s :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [h.mem_filter_iff, exists_prop]⟩
lemma has_basis.mem_of_superset (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) (ht : s i ⊆ t) : t ∈ l :=
(hl.mem_iff).2 ⟨i, hi, ht⟩
lemma has_basis.mem_of_mem (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) : s i ∈ l :=
hl.mem_of_superset hi $ subset.refl _
/-- Index of a basis set such that `s i ⊆ t` as an element of `subtype p`. -/
noncomputable def has_basis.index (h : l.has_basis p s) (t : set α) (ht : t ∈ l) :
{i : ι // p i} :=
⟨(h.mem_iff.1 ht).some, (h.mem_iff.1 ht).some_spec.fst⟩
lemma has_basis.property_index (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : p (h.index t ht) :=
(h.index t ht).2
lemma has_basis.set_index_mem (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ∈ l :=
h.mem_of_mem $ h.property_index _
lemma has_basis.set_index_subset (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ⊆ t :=
(h.mem_iff.1 ht).some_spec.snd
lemma has_basis.is_basis (h : l.has_basis p s) : is_basis p s :=
{ nonempty := let ⟨i, hi, H⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp univ_mem_sets in ⟨i, hi⟩,
inter := λ i j hi hj, by simpa [h.mem_iff] using l.inter_sets (h.mem_of_mem hi) (h.mem_of_mem hj) }
lemma has_basis.filter_eq (h : l.has_basis p s) : h.is_basis.filter = l :=
by { ext U, simp [h.mem_iff, is_basis.mem_filter_iff] }
lemma has_basis.eq_generate (h : l.has_basis p s) : l = generate { U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U } :=
by rw [← h.is_basis.filter_eq_generate, h.filter_eq]
lemma generate_eq_generate_inter (s : set (set α)) : generate s = generate (sInter '' { t | finite t ∧ t ⊆ s}) :=
by erw [(filter_basis.of_sets s).generate, ← (has_basis_generate s).filter_eq] ; refl
lemma of_sets_filter_eq_generate (s : set (set α)) : (filter_basis.of_sets s).filter = generate s :=
by rw [← (filter_basis.of_sets s).generate, generate_eq_generate_inter s] ; refl
lemma has_basis.to_has_basis (hl : l.has_basis p s) (h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') : l.has_basis p' s' :=
begin
constructor,
intro t,
rw hl.mem_iff,
split,
{ rintros ⟨i, pi, hi⟩,
rcases h i pi with ⟨i', pi', hi'⟩,
use [i', pi'],
tauto },
{ rintros ⟨i', pi', hi'⟩,
rcases h' i' pi' with ⟨i, pi, hi⟩,
use [i, pi],
tauto },
end
lemma has_basis.eventually_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s i → q x :=
by simpa using hl.mem_iff
lemma has_basis.frequently_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ x ∈ s i, q x :=
by simp [filter.frequently, hl.eventually_iff]
lemma has_basis.exists_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {P : set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P t → P s) :
(∃ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∃ (i) (hi : p i), P (s i) :=
⟨λ ⟨s, hs, hP⟩, let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs in ⟨i, hi, mono his hP⟩,
λ ⟨i, hi, hP⟩, ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, hP⟩⟩
lemma has_basis.forall_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {P : set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∀ i, p i → P (s i) :=
⟨λ H i hi, H (s i) $ hl.mem_of_mem hi,
λ H s hs, let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs in mono his (H i hi)⟩
lemma has_basis.ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
ne_bot l ↔ (∀ {i}, p i → (s i).nonempty) :=
forall_sets_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.symm.trans $ hl.forall_iff $ λ _ _, nonempty.mono
lemma has_basis.eq_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
l = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 $ hl.ne_bot_iff.trans $ by simp only [not_exists, not_and, ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty]
lemma basis_sets (l : filter α) : l.has_basis (λ s : set α, s ∈ l) id :=
⟨λ t, exists_sets_subset_iff.symm⟩
lemma has_basis_self {l : filter α} {P : set α → Prop} :
has_basis l (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ P s) id ↔ ∀ t, (t ∈ l ↔ ∃ r ∈ l, P r ∧ r ⊆ t) :=
by simp only [has_basis_iff, exists_prop, id, and_assoc]
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and each `s i` includes `s j` such that
`p j ∧ q j`, then `{s j | p j ∧ q j}` is a basis of `l`. -/
lemma has_basis.restrict (h : l.has_basis p s) {q : ι → Prop}
(hq : ∀ i, p i → ∃ j, p j ∧ q j ∧ s j ⊆ s i) :
l.has_basis (λ i, p i ∧ q i) s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, ⟨λ ht, _, λ ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩, h.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hpi.1, hti⟩⟩⟩,
rcases h.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩,
rcases hq i hpi with ⟨j, hpj, hqj, hji⟩,
exact ⟨j, ⟨hpj, hqj⟩, subset.trans hji hti⟩
end
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and `V ∈ l`, then `{s i | p i ∧ s i ⊆ V}`
is a basis of `l`. -/
lemma has_basis.restrict_subset (h : l.has_basis p s) {V : set α} (hV : V ∈ l) :
l.has_basis (λ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ V) s :=
h.restrict $ λ i hi, (h.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem_sets hV (h.mem_of_mem hi))).imp $
λ j hj, ⟨hj.fst, subset_inter_iff.1 hj.snd⟩
lemma has_basis.has_basis_self_subset {p : set α → Prop} (h : l.has_basis (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ p s) id)
{V : set α} (hV : V ∈ l) : l.has_basis (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ p s ∧ s ⊆ V) id :=
by simpa only [and_assoc] using h.restrict_subset hV
theorem has_basis.ge_iff (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l :=
⟨λ h i' hi', h $ hl'.mem_of_mem hi',
λ h s hs, let ⟨i', hi', hs⟩ := hl'.mem_iff.1 hs in mem_sets_of_superset (h _ hi') hs⟩
theorem has_basis.le_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ t ∈ l', ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
by simp only [le_def, hl.mem_iff]
theorem has_basis.le_basis_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ s' i' :=
by simp only [hl'.ge_iff, hl.mem_iff]
lemma has_basis.ext (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s')
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') : l = l' :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw hl.le_basis_iff hl',
simpa using h' },
{ rw hl'.le_basis_iff hl,
simpa using h },
end
lemma has_basis.inf (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∩ s' i.2) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
simp only [mem_inf_sets, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t, ⟨i, hi, ht⟩, t', ⟨i', hi', ht'⟩, H⟩,
use [(i, i'), ⟨hi, hi'⟩, subset.trans (inter_subset_inter ht ht') H] },
{ rintros ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, H⟩,
use [s i, i, hi, subset.refl _, s' i', i', hi', subset.refl _, H] }
end⟩
lemma has_basis_principal (t : set α) : (𝓟 t).has_basis (λ i : unit, true) (λ i, t) :=
⟨λ U, by simp⟩
lemma has_basis.sup (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊔ l').has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∪ s' i.2) :=
⟨begin
intros t,
simp only [mem_sup_sets, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff, prod.exists, union_subset_iff, exists_prop,
and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_left],
simp only [← and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_right, and_comm]
end⟩
lemma has_basis.inf_principal (hl : l.has_basis p s) (s' : set α) :
(l ⊓ 𝓟 s').has_basis p (λ i, s i ∩ s') :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [mem_inf_principal, hl.mem_iff, subset_def, mem_set_of_eq,
mem_inter_iff, and_imp]⟩
lemma has_basis.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i) ⦃i'⦄ (hi' : p' i'), (s i ∩ s' i').nonempty :=
(hl.inf hl').ne_bot_iff.trans $ by simp [@forall_swap _ ι']
lemma has_basis.inf_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i) ⦃s'⦄ (hs' : s' ∈ l'), (s i ∩ s').nonempty :=
hl.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff l'.basis_sets
lemma has_basis.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {t : set α} :
ne_bot (l ⊓ 𝓟 t) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i), (s i ∩ t).nonempty :=
(hl.inf_principal t).ne_bot_iff
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃s : set α⦄ (hs : s ∈ l) ⦃s'⦄ (hs' : s' ∈ l'), (s ∩ s').nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_ne_bot_iff
lemma inf_principal_ne_bot_iff {s : set α} :
ne_bot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ U ∈ l, (U ∩ s).nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff
lemma inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : filter α} :
f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ (U ∈ f) (V ∈ g), U ∩ V = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 $ inf_ne_bot_iff.trans $ by simp [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty]
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : filter α} :
disjoint f g ↔ ∃ (U ∈ f) (V ∈ g), U ∩ V = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff.trans inf_eq_bot_iff
lemma mem_iff_inf_principal_compl {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ f ↔ f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥ :=
begin
refine not_iff_not.1 (inf_principal_ne_bot_iff.trans _).symm,
exact ⟨λ h hs, by simpa [empty_not_nonempty] using h s hs,
λ hs t ht, inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 $ λ hts, hs $ mem_sets_of_superset ht hts⟩,
end
lemma mem_iff_disjoint_principal_compl {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ f ↔ disjoint f (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
mem_iff_inf_principal_compl.trans disjoint_iff.symm
lemma le_iff_forall_disjoint_principal_compl {f g : filter α} :
f ≤ g ↔ ∀ V ∈ g, disjoint f (𝓟 Vᶜ) :=
forall_congr $ λ _, forall_congr $ λ _, mem_iff_disjoint_principal_compl
lemma le_iff_forall_inf_principal_compl {f g : filter α} :
f ≤ g ↔ ∀ V ∈ g, f ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ = ⊥ :=
forall_congr $ λ _, forall_congr $ λ _, mem_iff_inf_principal_compl
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left {f g : filter α} :
ne_bot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
by simpa only [inf_ne_bot_iff, frequently_iff, exists_prop, and_comm]
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_right {f g : filter α} :
ne_bot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in g, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
by { rw inf_comm, exact inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left }
lemma has_basis.eq_binfi (h : l.has_basis p s) :
l = ⨅ i (_ : p i), 𝓟 (s i) :=
eq_binfi_of_mem_sets_iff_exists_mem $ λ t, by simp only [h.mem_iff, mem_principal_sets]
lemma has_basis.eq_infi (h : l.has_basis (λ _, true) s) :
l = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i) :=
by simpa only [infi_true] using h.eq_binfi
lemma has_basis_infi_principal {s : ι → set α} (h : directed (≥) s) [nonempty ι] :
(⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ _, true) s :=
⟨begin
refine λ t, (mem_infi (h.mono_comp _ _) t).trans $
by simp only [exists_prop, true_and, mem_principal_sets],
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end⟩
/-- If `s : ι → set α` is an indexed family of sets, then finite intersections of `s i` form a basis
of `⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)`. -/
lemma has_basis_infi_principal_finite (s : ι → set α) :
(⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ t : set ι, finite t) (λ t, ⋂ i ∈ t, s i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ U, (mem_infi_finite _).trans _⟩,
simp only [infi_principal_finset, mem_Union, mem_principal_sets, exists_prop,
exists_finite_iff_finset, finset.bInter_coe]
end
lemma has_basis_binfi_principal {s : β → set α} {S : set β} (h : directed_on (s ⁻¹'o (≥)) S)
(ne : S.nonempty) :
(⨅ i ∈ S, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ i, i ∈ S) s :=
⟨begin
refine λ t, (mem_binfi _ ne).trans $ by simp only [mem_principal_sets],
rw [directed_on_iff_directed, ← directed_comp, (∘)] at h ⊢,
apply h.mono_comp _ _,
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end⟩
lemma has_basis_binfi_principal'
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, p j → ∃ k (h : p k), s k ⊆ s i ∧ s k ⊆ s j) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅ i (h : p i), 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis p s :=
filter.has_basis_binfi_principal h ne
lemma has_basis.map (f : α → β) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.map f).has_basis p (λ i, f '' (s i)) :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [mem_map, image_subset_iff, hl.mem_iff, preimage]⟩
lemma has_basis.comap (f : β → α) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.comap f).has_basis p (λ i, f ⁻¹' (s i)) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
simp only [mem_comap_sets, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t', ⟨i, hi, ht'⟩, H⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, subset.trans (preimage_mono ht') H⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, ⟨i, hi, subset.refl _⟩, H⟩ }
end⟩
lemma comap_has_basis (f : α → β) (l : filter β) :
has_basis (comap f l) (λ s : set β, s ∈ l) (λ s, f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨λ t, mem_comap_sets⟩
lemma has_basis.prod_self (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l ×ᶠ l).has_basis p (λ i, (s i).prod (s i)) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
apply mem_prod_iff.trans,
split,
{ rintros ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, H⟩,
rcases hl.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem_sets ht₁ ht₂) with ⟨i, hi, ht⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, λ p ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩, H ⟨(ht hp₁).1, (ht hp₂).2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, H⟩ }
end⟩
lemma mem_prod_self_iff {s} : s ∈ l ×ᶠ l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, set.prod t t ⊆ s :=
l.basis_sets.prod_self.mem_iff
lemma has_basis.sInter_sets (h : has_basis l p s) :
⋂₀ l.sets = ⋂ i ∈ set_of p, s i :=
begin
ext x,
suffices : (∀ t ∈ l, x ∈ t) ↔ ∀ i, p i → x ∈ s i,
by simpa only [mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq, mem_sInter],
simp_rw h.mem_iff,
split,
{ intros h i hi,
exact h (s i) ⟨i, hi, subset.refl _⟩ },
{ rintros h _ ⟨i, hi, sub⟩,
exact sub (h i hi) },
end
variables [preorder ι] (l p s)
/-- `is_antimono_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a filter basis
such that `s` is decreasing and `p` is increasing, ie `i ≤ j → p i → p j`. -/
structure is_antimono_basis extends is_basis p s : Prop :=
(decreasing : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → i ≤ j → s j ⊆ s i)
(mono : monotone p)
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a antimono basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`,
and `s` is decreasing and `p` is increasing, ie `i ≤ j → p i → p j`. -/
structure has_antimono_basis [preorder ι] (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α)
extends has_basis l p s : Prop :=
(decreasing : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → i ≤ j → s j ⊆ s i)
(mono : monotone p)
end same_type
section two_types
variables {la : filter α} {pa : ι → Prop} {sa : ι → set α}
{lb : filter β} {pb : ι' → Prop} {sb : ι' → set β} {f : α → β}
lemma has_basis.tendsto_left_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), ∀ x ∈ sa i, f x ∈ t :=
by { simp only [tendsto, (hla.map f).le_iff, image_subset_iff], refl }
lemma has_basis.tendsto_right_iff (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ i (hi : pb i), ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ∈ sb i :=
by simp only [tendsto, hlb.ge_iff, mem_map, filter.eventually]
lemma has_basis.tendsto_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
by simp [hlb.tendsto_right_iff, hla.eventually_iff]
lemma tendsto.basis_left (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), ∀ x ∈ sa i, f x ∈ t :=
hla.tendsto_left_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_right (H : tendsto f la lb) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ i (hi : pb i), ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ∈ sb i :=
hlb.tendsto_right_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_both (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa)
(hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
(hla.tendsto_iff hlb).1 H
lemma has_basis.prod (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2) (λ i, (sa i.1).prod (sb i.2)) :=
(hla.comap prod.fst).inf (hlb.comap prod.snd)
lemma has_basis.prod' {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop}
{sa : ι → set α} {sb : ι → set β}
(hla : la.has_basis p sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis p sb)
(h_dir : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → ∃ k, p k ∧ sa k ⊆ sa i ∧ sb k ⊆ sb j) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis p (λ i, (sa i).prod (sb i)) :=
⟨begin
intros t,
rw mem_prod_iff,
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, u_in, v, v_in, huv⟩,
rcases hla.mem_iff.mp u_in with ⟨i, hi, si⟩,
rcases hlb.mem_iff.mp v_in with ⟨j, hj, sj⟩,
rcases h_dir hi hj with ⟨k, hk, ki, kj⟩,
use [k, hk],
calc
(sa k).prod (sb k) ⊆ (sa i).prod (sb j) : set.prod_mono ki kj
... ⊆ u.prod v : set.prod_mono si sj
... ⊆ t : huv, },
{ rintro ⟨i, hi, h⟩,
exact ⟨sa i, hla.mem_of_mem hi, sb i, hlb.mem_of_mem hi, h⟩ },
end⟩
end two_types
/-- `is_countably_generated f` means `f = generate s` for some countable `s`. -/
def is_countably_generated (f : filter α) : Prop :=
∃ s : set (set α), countable s ∧ f = generate s
/-- `is_countable_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a countable filter basis. -/
structure is_countable_basis (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) extends is_basis p s : Prop :=
(countable : countable $ set_of p)
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a countable basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`, and the set
defined by `p` is countable. -/
structure has_countable_basis (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) extends has_basis l p s : Prop :=
(countable : countable $ set_of p)
/-- A countable filter basis `B` on a type `α` is a nonempty countable collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element
of the collection. -/
structure countable_filter_basis (α : Type*) extends filter_basis α :=
(countable : countable sets)
-- For illustration purposes, the countable filter basis defining (at_top : filter ℕ)
instance nat.inhabited_countable_filter_basis : inhabited (countable_filter_basis ℕ) :=
⟨{ countable := countable_range (λ n, Ici n),
..(default $ filter_basis ℕ),}⟩
lemma antimono_seq_of_seq (s : ℕ → set α) :
∃ t : ℕ → set α, (∀ i j, i ≤ j → t j ⊆ t i) ∧ (⨅ i, 𝓟 $ s i) = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (t i) :=
begin
use λ n, ⋂ m ≤ n, s m, split,
{ exact λ i j hij, bInter_mono' (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hij) (λ n hn, subset.refl _) },
apply le_antisymm; rw le_infi_iff; intro i,
{ rw le_principal_iff, refine (bInter_mem_sets (finite_le_nat _)).2 (λ j hji, _),
rw ← le_principal_iff, apply infi_le_of_le j _, apply le_refl _ },
{ apply infi_le_of_le i _, rw principal_mono, intro a, simp, intro h, apply h, refl },
end
lemma countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq [complete_lattice α] {B : set ι} (Bcbl : countable B)
(Bne : B.nonempty) (f : ι → α) :
∃ (x : ℕ → ι), (⨅ t ∈ B, f t) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
begin
rw countable_iff_exists_surjective_to_subtype Bne at Bcbl,
rcases Bcbl with ⟨g, gsurj⟩,
rw infi_subtype',
use (λ n, g n), apply le_antisymm; rw le_infi_iff,
{ intro i, apply infi_le_of_le (g i) _, apply le_refl _ },
{ intros a, rcases gsurj a with ⟨i, rfl⟩, apply infi_le }
end
lemma countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq' [complete_lattice α] {B : set ι} (Bcbl : countable B) (f : ι → α)
{i₀ : ι} (h : f i₀ = ⊤) :
∃ (x : ℕ → ι), (⨅ t ∈ B, f t) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
begin
cases B.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hB Bnonempty,
{ rw [hB, infi_emptyset],
use λ n, i₀,
simp [h] },
{ exact countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq Bcbl Bnonempty f }
end
lemma countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi {B : set (set α)} (Bcbl : countable B) :
∃ (x : ℕ → set α), (⨅ t ∈ B, 𝓟 t) = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (x i) :=
countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq' Bcbl 𝓟 principal_univ
namespace is_countably_generated
/-- A set generating a countably generated filter. -/
def generating_set {f : filter α} (h : is_countably_generated f) :=
classical.some h
lemma countable_generating_set {f : filter α} (h : is_countably_generated f) :
countable h.generating_set :=
(classical.some_spec h).1
lemma eq_generate {f : filter α} (h : is_countably_generated f) :
f = generate h.generating_set :=
(classical.some_spec h).2
/-- A countable filter basis for a countably generated filter. -/
def countable_filter_basis {l : filter α} (h : is_countably_generated l) :
countable_filter_basis α :=
{ countable := (countable_set_of_finite_subset h.countable_generating_set).image _,
..filter_basis.of_sets (h.generating_set) }
lemma filter_basis_filter {l : filter α} (h : is_countably_generated l) :
h.countable_filter_basis.to_filter_basis.filter = l :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw h.eq_generate },
apply of_sets_filter_eq_generate,
end
lemma has_countable_basis {l : filter α} (h : is_countably_generated l) :
l.has_countable_basis (λ t, finite t ∧ t ⊆ h.generating_set) (λ t, ⋂₀ t) :=
⟨by convert has_basis_generate _ ; exact h.eq_generate,
countable_set_of_finite_subset h.countable_generating_set⟩
lemma exists_countable_infi_principal {f : filter α} (h : f.is_countably_generated) :
∃ s : set (set α), countable s ∧ f = ⨅ t ∈ s, 𝓟 t :=
begin
let B := h.countable_filter_basis,
use [B.sets, B.countable],
rw ← h.filter_basis_filter,
rw B.to_filter_basis.eq_infi_principal,
rw infi_subtype''
end
lemma exists_seq {f : filter α} (cblb : f.is_countably_generated) :
∃ x : ℕ → set α, f = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (x i) :=
begin
rcases cblb.exists_countable_infi_principal with ⟨B, Bcbl, rfl⟩,
exact countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi Bcbl,
end
/-- If `f` is countably generated and `f.has_basis p s`, then `f` admits a decreasing basis
enumerated by natural numbers such that all sets have the form `s i`. More precisely, there is a
sequence `i n` such that `p (i n)` for all `n` and `s (i n)` is a decreasing sequence of sets which
forms a basis of `f`-/
lemma exists_antimono_subbasis {f : filter α} (cblb : f.is_countably_generated)
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (hs : f.has_basis p s) :
∃ x : ℕ → ι, (∀ i, p (x i)) ∧ f.has_antimono_basis (λ _, true) (λ i, s (x i)) :=
begin
rcases cblb.exists_seq with ⟨x', hx'⟩,
have : ∀ i, x' i ∈ f := λ i, hx'.symm ▸ (infi_le (λ i, 𝓟 (x' i)) i) (mem_principal_self _),
let x : ℕ → {i : ι // p i} := λ n, nat.rec_on n (hs.index _ $ this 0)
(λ n xn, (hs.index _ $ inter_mem_sets (this $ n + 1) (hs.mem_of_mem xn.coe_prop))),
have x_mono : ∀ n : ℕ, s (x n.succ) ⊆ s (x n) :=
λ n, subset.trans (hs.set_index_subset _) (inter_subset_right _ _),
replace x_mono : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ≤ j → s (x j) ≤ s (x i),
{ refine @monotone_of_monotone_nat (order_dual $ set α) _ _ _,
exact x_mono },
have x_subset : ∀ i, s (x i) ⊆ x' i,
{ rintro (_|i),
exacts [hs.set_index_subset _, subset.trans (hs.set_index_subset _) (inter_subset_left _ _)] },
refine ⟨λ i, x i, λ i, (x i).2, _⟩,
have : (⨅ i, 𝓟 (s (x i))).has_antimono_basis (λ _, true) (λ i, s (x i)) :=
⟨has_basis_infi_principal (directed_of_sup x_mono), λ i j _ _ hij, x_mono hij, monotone_const⟩,
convert this,
exact le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, le_principal_iff.2 $ by cases i; apply hs.set_index_mem)
(hx'.symm ▸ le_infi (λ i, le_principal_iff.2 $
this.to_has_basis.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, trivial, x_subset i⟩))
end
/-- A countably generated filter admits a basis formed by a monotonically decreasing sequence of
sets. -/
lemma exists_antimono_basis {f : filter α} (cblb : f.is_countably_generated) :
∃ x : ℕ → set α, f.has_antimono_basis (λ _, true) x :=
let ⟨x, hxf, hx⟩ := cblb.exists_antimono_subbasis f.basis_sets in ⟨x, hx⟩
end is_countably_generated
lemma has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated {f : filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
(h : f.has_countable_basis p s) :
f.is_countably_generated :=
⟨{t | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = t}, h.countable.image s, h.to_has_basis.eq_generate⟩
lemma is_countably_generated_seq (x : ℕ → set α) : is_countably_generated (⨅ i, 𝓟 $ x i) :=
begin
rcases antimono_seq_of_seq x with ⟨y, am, h⟩,
rw h,
use [range y, countable_range _],
rw (has_basis_infi_principal _).eq_generate,
{ simp [range] },
{ exact directed_of_sup am },
{ use 0 },
end
lemma is_countably_generated_of_seq {f : filter α} (h : ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f = ⨅ i, 𝓟 $ x i) :
f.is_countably_generated :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := h in by rw h ; apply is_countably_generated_seq
lemma is_countably_generated_binfi_principal {B : set $ set α} (h : countable B) :
is_countably_generated (⨅ (s ∈ B), 𝓟 s) :=
is_countably_generated_of_seq (countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi h)
lemma is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antimono_basis {f : filter α} :
is_countably_generated f ↔ ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f.has_antimono_basis (λ _, true) x :=
begin
split,
{ exact λ h, h.exists_antimono_basis },
{ rintros ⟨x, h⟩,
rw h.to_has_basis.eq_infi,
exact is_countably_generated_seq x },
end
lemma is_countably_generated_principal (s : set α) : is_countably_generated (𝓟 s) :=
begin
rw show 𝓟 s = ⨅ i : ℕ, 𝓟 s, by simp,
apply is_countably_generated_seq
end
namespace is_countably_generated
lemma inf {f g : filter α} (hf : is_countably_generated f) (hg : is_countably_generated g) :
is_countably_generated (f ⊓ g) :=
begin
rw is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antimono_basis at hf hg,
rcases hf with ⟨s, hs⟩,
rcases hg with ⟨t, ht⟩,
exact has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated
⟨hs.to_has_basis.inf ht.to_has_basis, set.countable_encodable _⟩
end
lemma inf_principal {f : filter α} (h : is_countably_generated f) (s : set α) :
is_countably_generated (f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
h.inf (filter.is_countably_generated_principal s)
lemma exists_antimono_seq' {f : filter α} (cblb : f.is_countably_generated) :
∃ x : ℕ → set α, (∀ i j, i ≤ j → x j ⊆ x i) ∧ ∀ {s}, (s ∈ f ↔ ∃ i, x i ⊆ s) :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antimono_basis.mp cblb in
⟨x, λ i j, hx.decreasing trivial trivial, λ s, by simp [hx.to_has_basis.mem_iff]⟩
protected lemma comap {l : filter β} (h : l.is_countably_generated) (f : α → β) :
(comap f l).is_countably_generated :=
let ⟨x, hx_mono⟩ := h.exists_antimono_basis in
is_countably_generated_of_seq ⟨_, (hx_mono.to_has_basis.comap _).eq_infi⟩
end is_countably_generated
end filter
|
e48032d4e6da37db6d1c54bb9428b1a5eaf26340 | f57749ca63d6416f807b770f67559503fdb21001 | /hott/types/cubical/cube.hlean | 8951aca5648f293451c025f7a38a64ea4f9376b5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | aliassaf/lean | bd54e85bed07b1ff6f01396551867b2677cbc6ac | f9b069b6a50756588b309b3d716c447004203152 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,982,152,948 | 1,438,916,029,000 | 1,438,916,029,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,983 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Cubes
-/
import .square
open equiv is_equiv
namespace eq
inductive cube {A : Type} {a₀₀₀ : A}
: Π{a₂₀₀ a₀₂₀ a₂₂₀ a₀₀₂ a₂₀₂ a₀₂₂ a₂₂₂ : A}
{p₁₀₀ : a₀₀₀ = a₂₀₀} {p₀₁₀ : a₀₀₀ = a₀₂₀} {p₀₀₁ : a₀₀₀ = a₀₀₂}
{p₁₂₀ : a₀₂₀ = a₂₂₀} {p₂₁₀ : a₂₀₀ = a₂₂₀} {p₂₀₁ : a₂₀₀ = a₂₀₂}
{p₁₀₂ : a₀₀₂ = a₂₀₂} {p₀₁₂ : a₀₀₂ = a₀₂₂} {p₀₂₁ : a₀₂₀ = a₀₂₂}
{p₁₂₂ : a₀₂₂ = a₂₂₂} {p₂₁₂ : a₂₀₂ = a₂₂₂} {p₂₂₁ : a₂₂₀ = a₂₂₂}
(s₁₁₀ : square p₀₁₀ p₂₁₀ p₁₀₀ p₁₂₀)
(s₁₁₂ : square p₀₁₂ p₂₁₂ p₁₀₂ p₁₂₂)
(s₀₁₁ : square p₀₁₀ p₀₁₂ p₀₀₁ p₀₂₁)
(s₂₁₁ : square p₂₁₀ p₂₁₂ p₂₀₁ p₂₂₁)
(s₁₀₁ : square p₁₀₀ p₁₀₂ p₀₀₁ p₂₀₁)
(s₁₂₁ : square p₁₂₀ p₁₂₂ p₀₂₁ p₂₂₁), Type :=
idc : cube ids ids ids ids ids ids
variables {A B : Type} {a₀₀₀ a₂₀₀ a₀₂₀ a₂₂₀ a₀₀₂ a₂₀₂ a₀₂₂ a₂₂₂ a a' : A}
{p₁₀₀ : a₀₀₀ = a₂₀₀} {p₀₁₀ : a₀₀₀ = a₀₂₀} {p₀₀₁ : a₀₀₀ = a₀₀₂}
{p₁₂₀ : a₀₂₀ = a₂₂₀} {p₂₁₀ : a₂₀₀ = a₂₂₀} {p₂₀₁ : a₂₀₀ = a₂₀₂}
{p₁₀₂ : a₀₀₂ = a₂₀₂} {p₀₁₂ : a₀₀₂ = a₀₂₂} {p₀₂₁ : a₀₂₀ = a₀₂₂}
{p₁₂₂ : a₀₂₂ = a₂₂₂} {p₂₁₂ : a₂₀₂ = a₂₂₂} {p₂₂₁ : a₂₂₀ = a₂₂₂}
{s₁₁₀ : square p₀₁₀ p₂₁₀ p₁₀₀ p₁₂₀}
{s₁₁₂ : square p₀₁₂ p₂₁₂ p₁₀₂ p₁₂₂}
{s₀₁₁ : square p₀₁₀ p₀₁₂ p₀₀₁ p₀₂₁}
{s₂₁₁ : square p₂₁₀ p₂₁₂ p₂₀₁ p₂₂₁}
{s₁₀₁ : square p₁₀₀ p₁₀₂ p₀₀₁ p₂₀₁}
{s₁₂₁ : square p₁₂₀ p₁₂₂ p₀₂₁ p₂₂₁}
{b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : B}
definition idc [reducible] [constructor] := @cube.idc
definition idcube [reducible] [constructor] (a : A) := @cube.idc A a
definition rfl1 : cube s₁₁₀ s₁₁₀ vrfl vrfl vrfl vrfl := by induction s₁₁₀; exact idc
definition rfl2 : cube vrfl vrfl s₁₁₀ s₁₁₀ hrfl hrfl := by induction s₁₁₀; exact idc
definition rfl3 : cube hrfl hrfl hrfl hrfl s₁₀₁ s₁₀₁ := by induction s₁₀₁; exact idc
definition eq_of_cube (c : cube s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁) :
transpose s₁₀₁⁻¹ᵛ ⬝h s₁₁₀ ⬝h transpose s₁₂₁ =
whisker_square (eq_bottom_of_square s₀₁₁) (eq_bottom_of_square s₂₁₁) idp idp s₁₁₂ :=
by induction c; reflexivity
--set_option pp.implicit true
definition eq_of_vdeg_cube {s s' : square p₀₁₀ p₂₁₀ p₁₀₀ p₁₂₀}
(c : cube s s' vrfl vrfl vrfl vrfl) : s = s' :=
begin
induction s, exact eq_of_cube c
end
definition square_pathover [unfold 7]
{f₁ : A → b₁ = b₂} {f₂ : A → b₃ = b₄} {f₃ : A → b₁ = b₃} {f₄ : A → b₂ = b₄}
{p : a = a'}
{q : square (f₁ a) (f₂ a) (f₃ a) (f₄ a)} {r : square (f₁ a') (f₂ a') (f₃ a') (f₄ a')}
(s : cube q r (vdeg_square (ap f₁ p)) (vdeg_square (ap f₂ p))
(vdeg_square (ap f₃ p)) (vdeg_square (ap f₄ p))) : q =[p] r :=
by induction p;apply pathover_idp_of_eq;exact eq_of_vdeg_cube s
end eq
|
3a9b99edf38a81ea245ddc41a7b1f683d5c8b929 | e030b0259b777fedcdf73dd966f3f1556d392178 | /tests/lean/defeq_simp1.lean | 6413421877cde4a158f68bf1fe64dd2c3c76f542 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fgdorais/lean | 17b46a095b70b21fa0790ce74876658dc5faca06 | c3b7c54d7cca7aaa25328f0a5660b6b75fe26055 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,523,590,686 | 1,484,412,902,000 | 1,484,412,902,000 | 38,489,734 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,435,923,380,000 | 1,435,923,379,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 693 | lean | attribute [reducible]
definition nat_has_add2 : has_add nat :=
has_add.mk (λ x y : nat, x + y)
set_option pp.all true
open tactic
example (a b : nat) (H : @add nat (id (id nat.has_add)) a b = @add nat nat_has_add2 a b) : true :=
by do
s ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
get_local `H >>= infer_type >>= s^.dsimplify >>= trace,
constructor
example (a b : nat) (H : (λ x : nat, @add nat (id (id nat.has_add)) a b) = (λ x : nat, @add nat nat_has_add2 a x)) : true :=
by do
s ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
get_local `H >>= infer_type >>= s^.dsimplify >>= trace,
constructor
attribute [reducible]
definition nat_has_add3 : nat → has_add nat :=
λ n, has_add.mk (λ x y : nat, x + y)
|
69985b6c9b625f90431145d8c687f83cc70fbc25 | ae1e94c332e17c7dc7051ce976d5a9eebe7ab8a5 | /tests/lean/run/typeclass_diamond.lean | 519c30f983e09f722f6c87a30df57826c0e566b0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/lean4 | d082d13b01243e1de29ae680eefb476961221eef | 6a39c65bd28eb0e28c3870188f348c8914502718 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,948,755,391 | 1,610,665,114,000 | 1,610,665,114,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,738 | lean |
class Top₁ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Bot₁ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Left₁ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Right₁ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
instance Bot₁Inst : Bot₁ Nat.zero := {}
instance Left₁ToBot₁ (n : Nat) [Left₁ n] : Bot₁ n := {}
instance Right₁ToBot₁ (n : Nat) [Right₁ n] : Bot₁ n := {}
instance Top₁ToLeft₁ (n : Nat) [Top₁ n] : Left₁ n := {}
instance Top₁ToRight₁ (n : Nat) [Top₁ n] : Right₁ n := {}
instance Bot₁ToTopSucc (n : Nat) [Bot₁ n] : Top₁ n.succ := {}
class Top₂ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Bot₂ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Left₂ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Right₂ (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
instance Left₂ToBot₂ (n : Nat) [Left₂ n] : Bot₂ n := {}
instance Right₂ToBot₂ (n : Nat) [Right₂ n] : Bot₂ n := {}
instance Top₂ToLeft₂ (n : Nat) [Top₂ n] : Left₂ n := {}
instance Top₂ToRight₂ (n : Nat) [Top₂ n] : Right₂ n := {}
instance Bot₂ToTopSucc (n : Nat) [Bot₂ n] : Top₂ n.succ := {}
class Top (n : Nat) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
instance Top₁ToTop (n : Nat) [Top₁ n] : Top n := {}
instance Top₂ToTop (n : Nat) [Top₂ n] : Top n := {}
#synth Top Nat.zero.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ
def tst : Top Nat.zero.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ :=
inferInstance
|
2f086b4014ceac9e32ace8d20b0060482e4853bb | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Init/Data/Int/Basic.lean | f09be2bf6e5fc4942b5094abefe2b314ec911539 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,541 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
The integers, with addition, multiplication, and subtraction.
-/
prelude
import Init.Coe
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.List.Basic
open Nat
/- the Type, coercions, and notation -/
inductive Int : Type where
| ofNat : Nat → Int
| negSucc : Nat → Int
attribute [extern "lean_nat_to_int"] Int.ofNat
attribute [extern "lean_int_neg_succ_of_nat"] Int.negSucc
instance : Coe Nat Int := ⟨Int.ofNat⟩
namespace Int
instance : Inhabited Int := ⟨ofNat 0⟩
def negOfNat : Nat → Int
| 0 => 0
| succ m => negSucc m
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in
@[extern "lean_int_neg"]
protected def neg (n : @& Int) : Int :=
match n with
| ofNat n => negOfNat n
| negSucc n => succ n
def subNatNat (m n : Nat) : Int :=
match (n - m : Nat) with
| 0 => ofNat (m - n) -- m ≥ n
| (succ k) => negSucc k
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in
@[extern "lean_int_add"]
protected def add (m n : @& Int) : Int :=
match m, n with
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m + n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => subNatNat m (succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => subNatNat n (succ m)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => negSucc (succ (m + n))
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in
@[extern "lean_int_mul"]
protected def mul (m n : @& Int) : Int :=
match m, n with
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m * n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => negOfNat (m * succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => negOfNat (succ m * n)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => ofNat (succ m * succ n)
/-
The `Neg Int` default instance must have priority higher than `low` since
the default instance `OfNat Nat n` has `low` priority.
```
#check -42
```
-/
@[defaultInstance mid]
instance : Neg Int where
neg := Int.neg
instance : Add Int where
add := Int.add
instance : Mul Int where
mul := Int.mul
@[extern "lean_int_sub"]
protected def sub (m n : @& Int) : Int :=
m + (- n)
instance : Sub Int where
sub := Int.sub
inductive NonNeg : Int → Prop where
| mk (n : Nat) : NonNeg (ofNat n)
protected def le (a b : Int) : Prop := NonNeg (b - a)
instance : LE Int where
le := Int.le
protected def lt (a b : Int) : Prop := (a + 1) ≤ b
instance : LT Int where
lt := Int.lt
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in
@[extern "lean_int_dec_eq"]
protected def decEq (a b : @& Int) : Decidable (a = b) :=
match a, b with
| ofNat a, ofNat b => match decEq a b with
| isTrue h => isTrue <| h ▸ rfl
| isFalse h => isFalse <| fun h' => Int.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h)
| negSucc a, negSucc b => match decEq a b with
| isTrue h => isTrue <| h ▸ rfl
| isFalse h => isFalse <| fun h' => Int.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h)
| ofNat a, negSucc b => isFalse <| fun h => Int.noConfusion h
| negSucc a, ofNat b => isFalse <| fun h => Int.noConfusion h
instance : DecidableEq Int := Int.decEq
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in
@[extern "lean_int_dec_nonneg"]
private def decNonneg (m : @& Int) : Decidable (NonNeg m) :=
match m with
| ofNat m => isTrue <| NonNeg.mk m
| negSucc m => isFalse <| fun h => nomatch h
@[extern "lean_int_dec_le"]
instance decLe (a b : @& Int) : Decidable (a ≤ b) :=
decNonneg _
@[extern "lean_int_dec_lt"]
instance decLt (a b : @& Int) : Decidable (a < b) :=
decNonneg _
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in
@[extern "lean_nat_abs"]
def natAbs (m : @& Int) : Nat :=
match m with
| ofNat m => m
| negSucc m => m.succ
instance : OfNat Int n where
ofNat := Int.ofNat n
@[extern "lean_int_div"]
def div : (@& Int) → (@& Int) → Int
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m / n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => -ofNat (m / succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => -ofNat (succ m / n)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => ofNat (succ m / succ n)
@[extern "lean_int_mod"]
def mod : (@& Int) → (@& Int) → Int
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m % n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => ofNat (m % succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => -ofNat (succ m % n)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => -ofNat (succ m % succ n)
instance : Div Int where
div := Int.div
instance : Mod Int where
mod := Int.mod
def toNat : Int → Nat
| ofNat n => n
| negSucc n => 0
def natMod (m n : Int) : Nat := (m % n).toNat
protected def pow (m : Int) : Nat → Int
| 0 => 1
| succ n => Int.pow m n * m
instance : HPow Int Nat Int where
hPow := Int.pow
end Int
|
939d99718bda8f093781940a2ab1468409dd77da | 8930e38ac0fae2e5e55c28d0577a8e44e2639a6d | /data/set/basic.lean | 5d94b4e01ac2b41d2f0285638586a9ca3cf78b0f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SG4316/mathlib | 3d64035d02a97f8556ad9ff249a81a0a51a3321a | a7846022507b531a8ab53b8af8a91953fceafd3a | refs/heads/master | 1,584,869,960,527 | 1,530,718,645,000 | 1,530,724,110,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,024 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import tactic tactic.finish data.sigma
open function
namespace set
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a : α} {s t : set α}
instance : inhabited (set α) := ⟨∅⟩
@[extensionality]
theorem ext {a b : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b) : a = b :=
funext (assume x, propext (h x))
theorem set_eq_def (s t : set α) : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨begin intros h x, rw h end, set.ext⟩
@[trans] theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {α : Type u} {x : α} {s t : set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
/- mem and set_of -/
@[simp] theorem mem_set_of_eq {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ {a | p a} = p a := rfl
@[simp] theorem nmem_set_of_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} : a ∉ {a : α | P a} = ¬ P a := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_mem_eq {s : set α} : {x | x ∈ s} = s := rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a := iff.rfl
instance decidable_mem (s : set α) [H : decidable_pred s] : ∀ a, decidable (a ∈ s) := H
instance decidable_set_of (p : α → Prop) [H : decidable_pred p] : decidable_pred {a | p a} := H
@[simp] theorem set_of_subset_set_of {p q : α → Prop} : {a | p a} ⊆ {a | q a} ↔ (∀a, p a → q a) := iff.rfl
/- set coercion to a type -/
instance : has_coe_to_sort (set α) := ⟨_, λ s, {x // x ∈ s}⟩
@[simp] theorem set_coe_eq_subtype (s : set α) : coe_sort.{(u+1) (u+2)} s = {x // x ∈ s} := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_coe.forall {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ (∀ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.forall
@[simp] theorem set_coe.exists {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ (∃ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.exists
@[simp] theorem set_coe_cast : ∀ {s t : set α} (H' : s = t) (H : @eq (Type u) s t) (x : s),
cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| s _ rfl _ ⟨x, h⟩ := rfl
/- subset -/
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def {s t : set α} : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := rfl
@[refl] theorem subset.refl (a : set α) : a ⊆ a := assume x, id
@[trans] theorem subset.trans {a b c : set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c :=
assume x h, bc (ab h)
@[trans] theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {α : Type u} {x y : α} {s : set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem subset.antisymm {a b : set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
ext (λ x, iff.intro (λ ina, h₁ ina) (λ inb, h₂ inb))
theorem subset.antisymm_iff {a b : set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨λ e, e ▸ ⟨subset.refl _, subset.refl _⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alterantive name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
subset.antisymm h₁ h₂
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : set α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
assume h₁ h₂, h₁ h₂
theorem not_subset : (¬ s ⊆ t) ↔ ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t :=
by simp [subset_def, classical.not_forall]
/- strict subset -/
/-- `s ⊂ t` means that `s` is a strict subset of `t`, that is, `s ⊆ t` but `s ≠ t`. -/
def strict_subset (s t : set α) := s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t
instance : has_ssubset (set α) := ⟨strict_subset⟩
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t) := rfl
lemma exists_of_ssubset {α : Type u} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : (∃x∈t, x ∉ s) :=
classical.by_contradiction $ assume hn,
have t ⊆ s, from assume a hat, classical.by_contradiction $ assume has, hn ⟨a, hat, has⟩,
h.2 $ subset.antisymm h.1 this
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬ (x ∈ (∅ : set α)) :=
assume h : x ∈ ∅, h
@[simp] theorem not_not_mem [decidable (a ∈ s)] : ¬ (a ∉ s) ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
/- empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : set α) = {x | false} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_empty_eq (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : set α) = false := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_false : {a : α | false} = ∅ := rfl
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
by simp [set_eq_def]
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ :=
by { intro hs, rewrite hs at h, apply not_mem_empty _ h }
@[simp] theorem empty_subset (s : set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
assume x, assume h, false.elim h
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
by simp [subset.antisymm_iff]
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
theorem ne_empty_iff_exists_mem {s : set α} : s ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable;
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_empty {s : set α} : s ≠ ∅ → ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1
-- TODO: remove when simplifier stops rewriting `a ≠ b` to `¬ a = b`
theorem not_eq_empty_iff_exists {s : set α} : ¬ (s = ∅) ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
ne_empty_iff_exists_mem
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 $ e ▸ h
theorem subset_ne_empty {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : t ≠ ∅ → s ≠ ∅ :=
mt (subset_eq_empty h)
theorem ball_empty_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ (∅ : set α), p x) ↔ true :=
by simp [iff_def]
/- universal set -/
theorem univ_def : @univ α = {x | true} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_univ (x : α) : x ∈ @univ α := trivial
theorem empty_ne_univ [h : inhabited α] : (∅ : set α) ≠ univ :=
by simp [set_eq_def]
@[simp] theorem subset_univ (s : set α) : s ⊆ univ := λ x H, trivial
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
by simp [subset.antisymm_iff]
theorem eq_univ_of_univ_subset {s : set α} : univ ⊆ s → s = univ :=
univ_subset_iff.1
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
by simp [set_eq_def]
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ := eq_univ_iff_forall.2
/- union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : set α} (b : set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inl
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : set α} (a : set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inr
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := H
theorem mem_union.elim {x : α} {a b : set α} {P : Prop}
(H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P) (H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union_eq (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b = (x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem union_self (a : set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext (assume x, or_self _)
@[simp] theorem union_empty (a : set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext (assume x, or_false _)
@[simp] theorem empty_union (a : set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext (assume x, false_or _)
theorem union_comm (a b : set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext (assume x, or.comm)
theorem union_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∪ b) ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext (assume x, or.assoc)
instance union_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∪) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
instance union_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∪) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
by finish
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
by finish
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
by finish [subset_def, set_eq_def, iff_def]
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
by finish [subset_def, set_eq_def, iff_def]
@[simp] theorem subset_union_left (s t : set α) : s ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inl
@[simp] theorem subset_union_right (s t : set α) : t ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inr
theorem union_subset {s t r : set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
by finish [subset_def, union_def]
@[simp] theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
by finish [iff_def, subset_def]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂ :=
by finish [subset_def]
@[simp] theorem union_empty_iff {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ :=
⟨by finish [set_eq_def], by finish [set_eq_def]⟩
/- intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_eq (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b = (x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b) := rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
@[simp] theorem inter_self (a : set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext (assume x, and_self _)
@[simp] theorem inter_empty (a : set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext (assume x, and_false _)
@[simp] theorem empty_inter (a : set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext (assume x, false_and _)
theorem inter_comm (a b : set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext (assume x, and.comm)
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∩ b) ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext (assume x, and.assoc)
instance inter_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∩) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
instance inter_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∩) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
by finish
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
by finish
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_left (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ s := λ x H, and.left H
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_right (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ t := λ x H, and.right H
theorem subset_inter {s t r : set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t :=
by finish [subset_def, inter_def]
@[simp] theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨subset.trans h (inter_subset_left _ _), subset.trans h (inter_subset_right _ _)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, subset_inter h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem inter_univ (a : set α) : a ∩ univ = a :=
ext (assume x, and_true _)
@[simp] theorem univ_inter (a : set α) : univ ∩ a = a :=
ext (assume x, true_and _)
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ t = s :=
by finish [subset_def, set_eq_def, iff_def]
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∩ t = t :=
by finish [subset_def, set_eq_def, iff_def]
-- TODO(Mario): remove?
theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_right {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : t ≠ ∅ :=
by finish [set_eq_def, iff_def]
theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_left {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : s ≠ ∅ :=
by finish [set_eq_def, iff_def]
/- distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
ext (assume x, and_or_distrib_left)
theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
ext (assume x, or_and_distrib_right)
theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
ext (assume x, or_and_distrib_left)
theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
ext (assume x, and_or_distrib_right)
/- insert -/
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_of_has_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : has_insert.insert x s = insert x s := rfl
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : s ⊆ insert x s :=
assume y ys, or.inr ys
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : x ∈ insert x s :=
or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s := or.inr
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s := id
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne {x a : α} {s : set α} (xin : x ∈ insert a s) : x ≠ a → x ∈ s :=
by finish [insert_def]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ (x = a ∨ x ∈ s) := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
by finish [set_eq_def, iff_def]
theorem insert_subset : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ (a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t) :=
by simp [subset_def, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
assume a', or.imp_right (@h a')
theorem ssubset_insert {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
by finish [ssubset_def, set_eq_def]
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext $ by simp [or.left_comm]
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp [or.comm, or.left_comm]
@[simp] theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp [or.comm, or.left_comm]
-- TODO(Jeremy): make this automatic
theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : set α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
by safe [set_eq_def, iff_def]; have h' := a_1 a; finish
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x) :
∀ x, x ∈ s → P x :=
by finish
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a) :
∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x :=
by finish
theorem ball_insert_iff {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ (∀x ∈ s, P x) :=
by finish [iff_def]
/- singletons -/
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : set α) = insert a ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : set α) ↔ a = b :=
by finish [singleton_def]
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : set α) := by finish
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : set α)) : x = y :=
by finish
@[simp] theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : set α) ↔ x = y :=
by finish [set_eq_def, iff_def]
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : set α) :=
by finish
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = ({x} : set α) ∪ s :=
by finish [set_eq_def, or_comm]
@[simp] theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : set α) = {a} :=
by finish
@[simp] theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : set α) ≠ ∅ := insert_ne_empty _ _
@[simp] theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λh, h (by simp), λh b e, by simp at e; simp [*]⟩
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : {b | b = a} = {a} :=
set.ext $ by simp
theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s :=
by simp [singleton_def]
theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
/- separation -/
theorem mem_sep {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} :=
⟨xs, px⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sep_eq {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} = (x ∈ s ∧ p x) := rfl
theorem mem_sep_iff {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
iff.rfl
theorem eq_sep_of_subset {s t : set α} (ssubt : s ⊆ t) : s = {x ∈ t | x ∈ s} :=
by finish [set_eq_def, iff_def, subset_def]
theorem sep_subset (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) : {x ∈ s | p x} ⊆ s :=
assume x, and.left
theorem forall_not_of_sep_empty {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : {x ∈ s | p x} = ∅) :
∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
/- complement -/
theorem mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ -s := h
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ -s) : x ∉ s := h
@[simp] theorem mem_compl_eq (s : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ -s = (x ∉ s) := rfl
theorem mem_compl_iff (s : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ -s ↔ x ∉ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∩ -s = ∅ :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
@[simp] theorem compl_inter_self (s : set α) : -s ∩ s = ∅ :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
@[simp] theorem compl_empty : -(∅ : set α) = univ :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
@[simp] theorem compl_union (s t : set α) : -(s ∪ t) = -s ∩ -t :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
@[simp] theorem compl_compl (s : set α) : -(-s) = s :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
-- ditto
theorem compl_inter (s t : set α) : -(s ∩ t) = -s ∪ -t :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
@[simp] theorem compl_univ : -(univ : set α) = ∅ :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : set α) : s ∪ t = -(-s ∩ -t) :=
by simp [compl_inter, compl_compl]
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : set α) : s ∩ t = -(-s ∪ -t) :=
by simp [compl_compl]
@[simp] theorem union_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∪ -s = univ :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
@[simp] theorem compl_union_self (s : set α) : -s ∪ s = univ :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
theorem compl_comp_compl : compl ∘ compl = @id (set α) :=
funext compl_compl
theorem compl_subset_comm {s t : set α} : -s ⊆ t ↔ -t ⊆ s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
forall_congr (λ a, not_imp_comm)
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : set α} : -s ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
iff.symm $ eq_univ_iff_forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a,
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem subset_compl_comm {s t : set α} : s ⊆ -t ↔ t ⊆ -s :=
forall_congr $ λ a, imp_not_comm
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint {s t : set α} : s ⊆ -t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ a, and_imp.symm) subset_empty_iff
/- set difference -/
theorem diff_eq (s t : set α) : s \ t = s ∩ -t := rfl
theorem mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h1 : x ∈ s) (h2 : x ∉ t) : x ∈ s \ t :=
⟨h1, h2⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
theorem mem_diff_iff (s t : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ s \ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_diff_eq (s t : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ s \ t = (x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t) := rfl
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ (t \ s) = t :=
by finish [set_eq_def, iff_def, subset_def]
theorem diff_subset (s t : set α) : s \ t ⊆ s :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem diff_right_antimono {s t u : set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
diff_subset_diff (subset.refl s) h
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : set α) : -s = univ \ s :=
by finish [set_eq_def]
theorem diff_neq_empty {s t : set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h x hx, classical.by_contradiction $ assume : x ∉ t, show x ∈ (∅ : set α), from h ▸ ⟨hx, this⟩,
assume h, eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨hx, hnx⟩, hnx $ h hx⟩
@[simp] theorem diff_empty {s : set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
set.ext $ assume x, ⟨assume ⟨hx, _⟩, hx, assume h, ⟨h, not_false⟩⟩
theorem diff_diff {u : set α} : s \ t \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
set.ext $ by simp [not_or_distrib, and.comm, and.left_comm]
@[simp] theorem insert_sdiff (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s \ t = s \ t :=
set.ext $ by intro; constructor; simp [or_imp_distrib, h] {contextual := tt}
/- powerset -/
theorem mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ powerset s := h
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ∈ powerset s) : x ⊆ s := h
theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : set α) : x ∈ powerset s ↔ x ⊆ s := iff.rfl
/- inverse image -/
/-- The preimage of `s : set β` by `f : α → β`, written `f ⁻¹' s`,
is the set of `x : α` such that `f x ∈ s`. -/
def preimage {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β) : set α := {x | f x ∈ s}
infix ` ⁻¹' `:80 := preimage
section preimage
variables {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp] theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_preimage_eq {s : set β} {a : α} : (a ∈ f ⁻¹' s) = (f a ∈ s) := rfl
theorem preimage_mono {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
assume x hx, h hx
@[simp] theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_inter {s t : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_union {s t : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_compl {s : set β} : f ⁻¹' (- s) = - (f ⁻¹' s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : set β) :
f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_set_of_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' {a | p a} = {a | p (f a)} :=
rfl
theorem preimage_id {s : set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s := rfl
theorem preimage_comp {s : set γ} : (g ∘ f) ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) := rfl
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : set (subtype p)} {t : set α} :
s = subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ (∀x (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) :=
⟨assume s_eq x h, by rw [s_eq]; simp,
assume h, set.ext $ assume ⟨x, hx⟩, by simp [h]⟩
end preimage
/- function image -/
section image
infix ` '' `:80 := image
/-- Two functions `f₁ f₂ : α → β` are equal on `s`
if `f₁ x = f₂ x` for all `x ∈ a`. -/
@[reducible] def eq_on (f1 f2 : α → β) (a : set α) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ a, f1 x = f2 x
-- TODO(Jeremy): use bounded exists in image
theorem mem_image_iff_bex {f : α → β} {s : set α} {y : β} :
y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ x (_ : x ∈ s), f x = y := bex_def.symm
theorem mem_image_eq (f : α → β) (s : set α) (y: β) : y ∈ f '' s = ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) (y : β) : y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y := iff.rfl
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {x : α} {a : set α} (h : x ∈ a) : f x ∈ f '' a :=
⟨_, h, rfl⟩
theorem mem_image_of_injective {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} (hf : injective f) :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨b, hb, eq⟩, (hf eq) ▸ hb)
(assume h, mem_image_of_mem _ h)
theorem ball_image_of_ball {f : α → β} {s : set α} {p : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) : ∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y :=
by finish [mem_image_eq]
@[simp] theorem ball_image_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
iff.intro
(assume h a ha, h _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
(assume h b ⟨a, ha, eq⟩, eq ▸ h a ha)
theorem mono_image {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t :=
assume x ⟨y, hy, y_eq⟩, y_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem _ $ h hy
theorem mem_image_elim {f : α → β} {s : set α} {C : β → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s → C (f x)) :
∀{y : β}, y ∈ f '' s → C y
| ._ ⟨a, a_in, rfl⟩ := h a a_in
theorem mem_image_elim_on {f : α → β} {s : set α} {C : β → Prop} {y : β} (h_y : y ∈ f '' s)
(h : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s → C (f x)) : C y :=
mem_image_elim h h_y
@[congr] lemma image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : set α}
(h : ∀a∈s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s :=
by safe [set_eq_def, iff_def]
theorem image_eq_image_of_eq_on {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {s : set α} (heq : eq_on f₁ f₂ s) :
f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : set α) : (f ∘ g) '' a = f '' (g '' a) :=
subset.antisymm
(ball_image_of_ball $ assume a ha, mem_image_of_mem _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
(ball_image_of_ball $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume a ha, mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
/- Proof is removed as it uses generated names
TODO(Jeremy): make automatic,
begin
safe [set_eq_def, iff_def, mem_image, (∘)],
have h' := h_2 (g a_2),
finish
end -/
theorem image_subset {a b : set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b :=
by finish [subset_def, mem_image_eq]
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : set α) :
f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
by finish [set_eq_def, iff_def, mem_image_eq]
@[simp] theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := ext $ by simp
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (h : ∀x∈t, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' s ∩ f '' t = f '' (s ∩ t) :=
subset.antisymm
(assume b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩,
have a₂ = a₁, from h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp *),
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩)
(subset_inter (mono_image $ inter_subset_left _ _) (mono_image $ inter_subset_right _ _))
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (H : injective f) :
f '' s ∩ f '' t = f '' (s ∩ t) :=
image_inter_on (assume x _ y _ h, H h)
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall $ by simp [image]; exact H
@[simp] theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp [image]; rw eq_comm
theorem fix_set_compl (t : set α) : compl t = - t := rfl
-- TODO(Jeremy): there is an issue with - t unfolding to compl t
theorem mem_compl_image (t : set α) (S : set (set α)) :
t ∈ compl '' S ↔ -t ∈ S :=
begin
suffices : ∀ x, -x = t ↔ -t = x, {simp [fix_set_compl, this]},
intro x, split; { intro e, subst e, simp }
end
@[simp] theorem image_id (s : set α) : id '' s = s := ext $ by simp
theorem compl_compl_image (S : set (set α)) :
compl '' (compl '' S) = S :=
by rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} :
f '' (insert a s) = insert (f a) (f '' s) :=
ext $ by simp [and_or_distrib_left, exists_or_distrib, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(I : left_inverse g f) (s : set α) : f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s :=
λ b ⟨a, h, e⟩, e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(I : left_inverse g f) (s : set β) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s :=
λ b h, ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
image f = preimage g :=
funext $ λ s, subset.antisymm
(image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s)
(preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : set α}
(h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s :=
by rw image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂; refl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : injective f) : f '' -s ⊆ -(f '' s) :=
subset_compl_iff_disjoint.2 $ by simp [image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : surjective f) : -(f '' s) ⊆ f '' -s :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 $
by rw ← image_union; simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : bijective f) : f '' -s = -(f '' s) :=
subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
/- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
theorem image_subset_iff {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} :
f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
ball_image_iff
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 (subset.refl _)
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) :
s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) :=
λ x, mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : set α) (h : injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
subset.antisymm
(λ x ⟨y, hy, e⟩, h e ▸ hy)
(subset_preimage_image f s)
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} {s : set β} (h : surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
subset.antisymm
(image_preimage_subset f s)
(λ x hx, let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x in ⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩)
theorem compl_image : image (@compl α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {α : Type u} {p : set α → Prop} :
compl '' {x | p x} = {x | p (- x)} :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) :=
λ x h, ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) :=
λ x h, or.elim h (λ l, or.inl $ mem_image_of_mem _ l) (λ r, or.inr r)
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
lemma subtype_val_image {p : α → Prop} {s : set (subtype p)} :
subtype.val '' s = {x | ∃h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : subtype p) ∈ s} :=
set.ext $ assume a,
⟨assume ⟨⟨a', ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩, h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩,
assume ⟨ha, in_s⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
end image
theorem univ_eq_true_false : univ = ({true, false} : set Prop) :=
eq.symm $ eq_univ_of_forall $ classical.cases (by simp) (by simp)
section range
variables {f : ι → α}
open function
/-- Range of a function.
This function is more flexible than `f '' univ`, as the image requires that the domain is in Type
and not an arbitrary Sort. -/
def range (f : ι → α) : set α := {x | ∃y, f y = x}
@[simp] theorem mem_range {x : α} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x := iff.rfl
theorem mem_range_self (i : ι) : f i ∈ range f := ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem forall_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ (∀ i, p (f i)) :=
⟨assume h i, h (f i) (mem_range_self _), assume h a ⟨i, (hi : f i = a)⟩, hi ▸ h i⟩
theorem range_iff_surjective : range f = univ ↔ surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[simp] theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ := range_iff_surjective.2 surjective_id
@[simp] theorem image_univ {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} : f '' univ = range f :=
set.ext $ by simp [image, range]
theorem range_comp {g : α → β} : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f :=
subset.antisymm
(forall_range_iff.mpr $ assume i, mem_image_of_mem g (mem_range_self _))
(ball_image_iff.mpr $ forall_range_iff.mpr mem_range_self)
theorem range_subset_iff {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} {s : set β} : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_range_iff
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : set β} :
f '' preimage f t = t ∩ range f :=
set.ext $ assume x, ⟨assume ⟨x, hx, heq⟩, heq ▸ ⟨hx, mem_range_self _⟩,
assume ⟨hx, ⟨y, h_eq⟩⟩, h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f $
show y ∈ preimage f t, by simp [preimage, h_eq, hx]⟩
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_range_eq [setoid α] : range (λx : α, ⟦x⟧) = univ :=
range_iff_surjective.2 quot.exists_rep
end range
lemma subtype_val_range {p : α → Prop} :
range (@subtype.val _ p) = {x | p x} :=
by rw ← image_univ; simp [-image_univ, subtype_val_image]
/-- The set `s` is pairwise `r` if `r x y` for all *distinct* `x y ∈ s`. -/
def pairwise_on (s : set α) (r : α → α → Prop) := ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → r x y
end set
namespace set
section prod
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables {s s₁ s₂ : set α} {t t₁ t₂ : set β}
/-- The cartesian product `prod s t` is the set of `(a, b)`
such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def prod (s : set α) (t : set β) : set (α × β) :=
{p | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t}
theorem mem_prod_eq {p : α × β} : p ∈ set.prod s t = (p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_prod {p : α × β} : p ∈ set.prod s t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem prod_empty {s : set α} : set.prod s ∅ = (∅ : set (α × β)) :=
set.ext $ by simp [set.prod]
@[simp] theorem empty_prod {t : set β} : set.prod ∅ t = (∅ : set (α × β)) :=
set.ext $ by simp [set.prod]
theorem insert_prod {a : α} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
set.prod (insert a s) t = (prod.mk a '' t) ∪ set.prod s t :=
set.ext begin simp [set.prod, image, iff_def, or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt}; cc end
theorem prod_insert {b : β} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
set.prod s (insert b t) = ((λa, (a, b)) '' s) ∪ set.prod s t :=
set.ext begin simp [set.prod, image, iff_def, or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt}; cc end
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
set.prod (preimage f s) (preimage g t) = preimage (λp, (f p.1, g p.2)) (set.prod s t) := rfl
theorem prod_mono {s₁ s₂ : set α} {t₁ t₂ : set β} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
set.prod s₁ t₁ ⊆ set.prod s₂ t₂ :=
assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
theorem prod_inter_prod : set.prod s₁ t₁ ∩ set.prod s₂ t₂ = set.prod (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
subset.antisymm
(assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩, ⟨ha₂, hb₂⟩⟩, ⟨⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, ⟨hb₁, hb₂⟩⟩)
(subset_inter
(prod_mono (inter_subset_left _ _) (inter_subset_left _ _))
(prod_mono (inter_subset_right _ _) (inter_subset_right _ _)))
theorem image_swap_prod : (λp:β×α, (p.2, p.1)) '' set.prod t s = set.prod s t :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp [mem_image_eq, set.prod, and_comm]; exact
⟨ assume ⟨b', a', ⟨h_a, h_b⟩, h⟩, by subst a'; subst b'; assumption,
assume h, ⟨b, a, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@prod.swap α β) = preimage prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse prod.swap_left_inverse prod.swap_right_inverse
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
set.prod (image m₁ s) (image m₂ t) = image (λp:α×β, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (set.prod s t) :=
set.ext $ by simp [-exists_and_distrib_right, exists_and_distrib_right.symm, and.left_comm, and.assoc, and.comm]
theorem prod_range_range_eq {α β γ δ} {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
set.prod (range m₁) (range m₂) = range (λp:α×β, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) :=
set.ext $ by simp [range]
@[simp] theorem prod_singleton_singleton {a : α} {b : β} :
set.prod {a} {b} = ({(a, b)} : set (α×β)) :=
set.ext $ by simp [set.prod]
theorem prod_neq_empty_iff {s : set α} {t : set β} :
set.prod s t ≠ ∅ ↔ (s ≠ ∅ ∧ t ≠ ∅) :=
by simp [not_eq_empty_iff_exists]
@[simp] theorem prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq {a : α} {b : β} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
(a, b) ∈ set.prod s t = (a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t) := rfl
@[simp] theorem univ_prod_univ : set.prod univ univ = (univ : set (α×β)) :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp
end prod
end set
|
0db31f734ba325fb2b054cd0ac79b5e2e8f76c5c | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/algebra/homology/chain_complex.lean | 41dcb35b29bddd342c186d86171b98a5c1515970 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,654 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.int.basic
import category_theory.graded_object
import category_theory.differential_object
/-!
# Chain complexes
We define a chain complex in `V` as a differential `ℤ`-graded object in `V`.
This is fancy language for the obvious definition,
and it seems we can use it straightforwardly:
```
example (C : chain_complex V) : C.X 5 ⟶ C.X 6 := C.d 5
```
-/
universes v u
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
variables (V : Type u) [category.{v} V]
variables [has_zero_morphisms V]
section
/--
A `homological_complex V b` for `b : β` is a (co)chain complex graded by `β`,
with differential in grading `b`.
(We use the somewhat cumbersome `homological_complex` to avoid the name conflict with `ℂ`.)
-/
abbreviation homological_complex {β : Type} [add_comm_group β] (b : β) : Type (max v u) :=
differential_object (graded_object_with_shift b V)
/--
A chain complex in `V` is "just" a differential `ℤ`-graded object in `V`,
with differential graded `-1`.
-/
abbreviation chain_complex : Type (max v u) :=
homological_complex V (-1 : ℤ)
/--
A cochain complex in `V` is "just" a differential `ℤ`-graded object in `V`,
with differential graded `+1`.
-/
abbreviation cochain_complex : Type (max v u) :=
homological_complex V (1 : ℤ)
-- The chain groups of a chain complex `C` are accessed as `C.X i`,
-- and the differentials as `C.d i : C.X i ⟶ C.X (i-1)`.
example (C : chain_complex V) : C.X 5 ⟶ C.X 4 := C.d 5
end
namespace homological_complex
variables {V}
variables {β : Type} [add_comm_group β] {b : β}
@[simp]
lemma d_squared (C : homological_complex V b) (i : β) :
C.d i ≫ C.d (i+b) = 0 :=
congr_fun (C.d_squared) i
/--
A convenience lemma for morphisms of cochain complexes,
picking out one component of the commutation relation.
-/
-- I haven't been able to get this to work with projection notation: `f.comm_at i`
@[simp]
lemma comm_at {C D : homological_complex V b} (f : C ⟶ D) (i : β) :
C.d i ≫ f.f (i+b) = f.f i ≫ D.d i :=
congr_fun f.comm i
@[simp]
lemma comm {C D : homological_complex V b} (f : C ⟶ D) : C.d ≫ f.f⟦1⟧' = f.f ≫ D.d :=
differential_object.hom.comm _
variables (V)
/-- The forgetful functor from cochain complexes to graded objects, forgetting the differential. -/
abbreviation forget : (homological_complex V b) ⥤ (graded_object β V) :=
differential_object.forget _
section
local attribute [instance] has_zero_object.has_zero
instance : inhabited (homological_complex (discrete punit) b) := ⟨0⟩
end
end homological_complex
open homological_complex
-- The components of a cochain map `f : C ⟶ D` are accessed as `f.f i`.
example {C D : cochain_complex V} (f : C ⟶ D) : C.X 5 ⟶ D.X 5 := f.f 5
example {C D : cochain_complex V} (f : C ⟶ D) : C.d ≫ f.f⟦1⟧' = f.f ≫ D.d := by simp
example {C D : cochain_complex V} (f : C ⟶ D) : C.d 5 ≫ f.f 6 = f.f 5 ≫ D.d 5 := comm_at f 5
-- TODO when V is enriched in W, what do we need to ensure
-- `chain_complex V` is also enriched in W?
-- TODO `chain_complex V` is a module category for `V` when `V` is monoidal
-- TODO When V is enriched in AddCommGroup, and has coproducts,
-- we can collapse a double complex to obtain a complex.
-- If the double complex is supported in a quadrant, we only need finite coproducts.
-- TODO when V is monoidal, enriched in `AddCommGroup`,
-- and has coproducts then
-- `chain_complex V` is monoidal too.
-- If the complexes are bounded below we only need finite coproducts.
|
91cdbab9eb8d9ce4a39db396dc7ef484cfaa87ba | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/system/random/basic_auto.lean | d693239bf28e23de6295e83535d69cc7d4637809 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,251 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author(s): Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebra.group_power.default
import Mathlib.control.uliftable
import Mathlib.control.monad.basic
import Mathlib.data.bitvec.basic
import Mathlib.data.list.basic
import Mathlib.data.set.intervals.basic
import Mathlib.data.stream.basic
import Mathlib.data.fin
import Mathlib.tactic.cache
import Mathlib.tactic.interactive
import Mathlib.tactic.norm_num
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.system.io
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.system.random
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u u_1 v l
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Rand Monad and Random Class
This module provides tools for formulating computations guided by randomness and for
defining objects that can be created randomly.
## Main definitions
* `rand` monad for computations guided by randomness;
* `random` class for objects that can be generated randomly;
* `random` to generate one object;
* `random_r` to generate one object inside a range;
* `random_series` to generate an infinite series of objects;
* `random_series_r` to generate an infinite series of objects inside a range;
* `io.mk_generator` to create a new random number generator;
* `io.run_rand` to run a randomized computation inside the `io` monad;
* `tactic.run_rand` to run a randomized computation inside the `tactic` monad
## Local notation
* `i .. j` : `Icc i j`, the set of values between `i` and `j` inclusively;
## Tags
random monad io
## References
* Similar library in Haskell: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/MonadRandom
-/
/-- A monad to generate random objects using the generator type `g` -/
def rand_g (g : Type) (α : Type u) := state (ulift g) α
/-- A monad to generate random objects using the generator type `std_gen` -/
def rand (α : Type u_1) := rand_g std_gen
protected instance rand_g.uliftable (g : Type) : uliftable (rand_g g) (rand_g g) :=
state_t.uliftable' (equiv.trans equiv.ulift (equiv.symm equiv.ulift))
/-- Generate one more `ℕ` -/
def rand_g.next {g : Type} [random_gen g] : rand_g g ℕ :=
state_t.mk (prod.map id ulift.up ∘ random_gen.next ∘ ulift.down)
/-- `bounded_random α` gives us machinery to generate values of type `α` between certain bounds -/
class bounded_random (α : Type u) [preorder α] where
random_r : (g : Type) → [_inst_1_1 : random_gen g] → (x y : α) → x ≤ y → rand_g g ↥(set.Icc x y)
/-- `random α` gives us machinery to generate values of type `α` -/
class random (α : Type u) where
random : (g : Type) → [_inst_1 : random_gen g] → rand_g g α
/-- shift_31_left = 2^31; multiplying by it shifts the binary
representation of a number left by 31 bits, dividing by it shifts it
right by 31 bits -/
def shift_31_left : ℕ :=
bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0
(bit0 1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
namespace rand
/-- create a new random number generator distinct from the one stored in the state -/
def split (g : Type) [random_gen g] : rand_g g g :=
state_t.mk (prod.map id ulift.up ∘ random_gen.split ∘ ulift.down)
/-- Generate a random value of type `α`. -/
def random (α : Type u) {g : Type} [random_gen g] [random α] : rand_g g α := random α g
/-- generate an infinite series of random values of type `α` -/
def random_series (α : Type u) {g : Type} [random_gen g] [random α] : rand_g g (stream α) :=
do
let gen ← uliftable.up (split g)
pure (stream.corec_state (random α g) gen)
/-- Generate a random value between `x` and `y` inclusive. -/
def random_r {α : Type u} {g : Type} [random_gen g] [preorder α] [bounded_random α] (x : α) (y : α)
(h : x ≤ y) : rand_g g ↥(set.Icc x y) :=
bounded_random.random_r g x y h
/-- generate an infinite series of random values of type `α` between `x` and `y` inclusive. -/
def random_series_r {α : Type u} {g : Type} [random_gen g] [preorder α] [bounded_random α] (x : α)
(y : α) (h : x ≤ y) : rand_g g (stream ↥(set.Icc x y)) :=
do
let gen ← uliftable.up (split g)
pure (stream.corec_state (bounded_random.random_r g x y h) gen)
end rand
namespace io
/-- create and a seed a random number generator -/
def mk_generator : io std_gen :=
do
let seed ← rand 0 shift_31_left
return (mk_std_gen seed)
/-- Run `cmd` using a randomly seeded random number generator -/
def run_rand {α : Type} (cmd : rand α) : io α :=
do
let g ← mk_generator
return (prod.fst (state_t.run cmd (ulift.up g)))
/-- Run `cmd` using the provided seed. -/
def run_rand_with {α : Type} (seed : ℕ) (cmd : rand α) : io α :=
return (prod.fst (state_t.run cmd (ulift.up (mk_std_gen seed))))
/-- randomly generate a value of type α -/
def random {α : Type} [random α] : io α := run_rand (rand.random α)
/-- randomly generate an infinite series of value of type α -/
def random_series {α : Type} [random α] : io (stream α) := run_rand (rand.random_series α)
/-- randomly generate a value of type α between `x` and `y` -/
def random_r {α : Type} [preorder α] [bounded_random α] (x : α) (y : α) (p : x ≤ y) :
io ↥(set.Icc x y) :=
run_rand (bounded_random.random_r std_gen x y p)
/-- randomly generate an infinite series of value of type α between `x` and `y` -/
def random_series_r {α : Type} [preorder α] [bounded_random α] (x : α) (y : α) (h : x ≤ y) :
io (stream ↥(set.Icc x y)) :=
run_rand (rand.random_series_r x y h)
end io
namespace tactic
/-- create a seeded random number generator in the `tactic` monad -/
/-- run `cmd` using the a randomly seeded random number generator
in the tactic monad -/
/-- Generate a random value between `x` and `y` inclusive. -/
/-- Generate an infinite series of random values of type `α` between `x` and `y` inclusive. -/
/-- randomly generate a value of type α -/
end tactic
namespace fin
/-- generate a `fin` randomly -/
protected def random {g : Type} [random_gen g] {n : ℕ} [fact (0 < n)] : rand_g g (fin n) :=
state_t.mk fun (_x : ulift g) => sorry
end fin
protected instance nat_bounded_random : bounded_random ℕ :=
bounded_random.mk
fun (g : Type) (inst : random_gen g) (x y : ℕ) (hxy : x ≤ y) =>
do
let z ← fin.random
pure { val := subtype.val z + x, property := sorry }
/-- This `bounded_random` interval generates integers between `x` and
`y` by first generating a natural number between `0` and `y - x` and
shifting the result appropriately. -/
protected instance int_bounded_random : bounded_random ℤ :=
bounded_random.mk
fun (g : Type) (inst : random_gen g) (x y : ℤ) (hxy : x ≤ y) =>
do
bounded_random.random_r g 0 (int.nat_abs (y - x)) sorry
sorry
protected instance fin_random (n : ℕ) [fact (0 < n)] : random (fin n) :=
random.mk fun (g : Type) (inst : random_gen g) => fin.random
protected instance fin_bounded_random (n : ℕ) : bounded_random (fin n) :=
bounded_random.mk
fun (g : Type) (inst : random_gen g) (x y : fin n) (p : x ≤ y) =>
do
rand.random_r (subtype.val x) (subtype.val y) p
sorry
/-- A shortcut for creating a `random (fin n)` instance from
a proof that `0 < n` rather than on matching on `fin (succ n)` -/
def random_fin_of_pos {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : random (fin n) := sorry
theorem bool_of_nat_mem_Icc_of_mem_Icc_to_nat (x : Bool) (y : Bool) (n : ℕ) :
n ∈ set.Icc (bool.to_nat x) (bool.to_nat y) → bool.of_nat n ∈ set.Icc x y :=
sorry
protected instance bool.random : random Bool :=
random.mk
fun (g : Type) (inst : random_gen g) =>
(bool.of_nat ∘ subtype.val) <$> bounded_random.random_r g 0 1 sorry
protected instance bool.bounded_random : bounded_random Bool :=
bounded_random.mk
fun (g : Type) (_inst : random_gen g) (x y : Bool) (p : x ≤ y) =>
subtype.map bool.of_nat (bool_of_nat_mem_Icc_of_mem_Icc_to_nat x y) <$>
bounded_random.random_r g (bool.to_nat x) (bool.to_nat y) (bool.to_nat_le_to_nat p)
/-- generate a random bit vector of length `n` -/
def bitvec.random {g : Type} [random_gen g] (n : ℕ) : rand_g g (bitvec n) :=
bitvec.of_fin <$> rand.random (fin (bit0 1 ^ n))
/-- generate a random bit vector of length `n` -/
def bitvec.random_r {g : Type} [random_gen g] {n : ℕ} (x : bitvec n) (y : bitvec n) (h : x ≤ y) :
rand_g g ↥(set.Icc x y) :=
(fun
(h' :
∀ (a : fin (bit0 1 ^ n)),
a ∈ set.Icc (bitvec.to_fin x) (bitvec.to_fin y) → bitvec.of_fin a ∈ set.Icc x y) =>
subtype.map bitvec.of_fin h' <$>
rand.random_r (bitvec.to_fin x) (bitvec.to_fin y) (bitvec.to_fin_le_to_fin_of_le h))
sorry
protected instance random_bitvec (n : ℕ) : random (bitvec n) :=
random.mk fun (_x : Type) (inst : random_gen _x) => bitvec.random n
protected instance bounded_random_bitvec (n : ℕ) : bounded_random (bitvec n) :=
bounded_random.mk
fun (_x : Type) (inst : random_gen _x) (x y : bitvec n) (p : x ≤ y) => bitvec.random_r x y p
end Mathlib |
5ff3ab19605d21974536d18d873d8197bd8a6f84 | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /library/standard/logic/connectives/if.lean | 44bb046ee8721b5df57bcbf00775b003697a4b57 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,502 | lean | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Leonardo de Moura
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
import logic.classes.decidable tools.tactic
using decidable tactic
definition ite (c : Prop) {H : decidable c} {A : Type} (t e : A) : A :=
rec_on H (assume Hc, t) (assume Hnc, e)
notation `if` c `then` t `else` e:45 := ite c t e
theorem if_pos {c : Prop} {H : decidable c} (Hc : c) {A : Type} (t e : A) : (if c then t else e) = t :=
decidable_rec
(assume Hc : c, refl (@ite c (inl Hc) A t e))
(assume Hnc : ¬c, absurd_elim (@ite c (inr Hnc) A t e = t) Hc Hnc)
H
theorem if_neg {c : Prop} {H : decidable c} (Hnc : ¬c) {A : Type} (t e : A) : (if c then t else e) = e :=
decidable_rec
(assume Hc : c, absurd_elim (@ite c (inl Hc) A t e = e) Hc Hnc)
(assume Hnc : ¬c, refl (@ite c (inr Hnc) A t e))
H
theorem if_t_t (c : Prop) {H : decidable c} {A : Type} (t : A) : (if c then t else t) = t :=
decidable_rec
(assume Hc : c, refl (@ite c (inl Hc) A t t))
(assume Hnc : ¬c, refl (@ite c (inr Hnc) A t t))
H
theorem if_true {A : Type} (t e : A) : (if true then t else e) = t :=
if_pos trivial t e
theorem if_false {A : Type} (t e : A) : (if false then t else e) = e :=
if_neg not_false_trivial t e
|
73fdda70716c7d928b341c23cad9e4c238047232 | 3f7026ea8bef0825ca0339a275c03b911baef64d | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/constructions/limits_of_products_and_equalizers.lean | 2eebf57802662e66bac07ae6d505f07fe28eaa80 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rspencer01/mathlib | b1e3afa5c121362ef0881012cc116513ab09f18c | c7d36292c6b9234dc40143c16288932ae38fdc12 | refs/heads/master | 1,595,010,346,708 | 1,567,511,503,000 | 1,567,511,503,000 | 206,071,681 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,567,513,643,000 | 1,567,513,643,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,141 | lean | /-
-- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.limits.shapes.products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.equalizers
/-!
# Constructing limits from products and equalizers.
If a category has all products, and all equalizers, then it has all limits.
TODO: provide the dual result.
-/
open category_theory
open opposite
namespace category_theory.limits
universes v u
variables {C : Type u} [𝒞 : category.{v+1} C]
include 𝒞
@[simp] def equalizer_diagram [has_products.{v} C] {J} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ C) : walking_parallel_pair ⥤ C :=
let pi_obj := limits.pi_obj F.obj in
let pi_hom := limits.pi_obj (λ f : (Σ p : J × J, p.1 ⟶ p.2), F.obj f.1.2) in
let s : pi_obj ⟶ pi_hom :=
pi.lift (λ f : (Σ p : J × J, p.1 ⟶ p.2), pi.π F.obj f.1.1 ≫ F.map f.2) in
let t : pi_obj ⟶ pi_hom :=
pi.lift (λ f : (Σ p : J × J, p.1 ⟶ p.2), pi.π F.obj f.1.2) in
parallel_pair s t
@[simp] def equalizer_diagram.cones_hom [has_products.{v} C] {J} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ C) :
(equalizer_diagram F).cones ⟶ F.cones :=
{ app := λ X c,
{ app := λ j, c.app walking_parallel_pair.zero ≫ pi.π _ j,
naturality' := λ j j' f,
begin
have L := c.naturality walking_parallel_pair_hom.left,
have R := c.naturality walking_parallel_pair_hom.right,
have t := congr_arg (λ g, g ≫ pi.π _ (⟨(j, j'), f⟩ : Σ (p : J × J), p.fst ⟶ p.snd)) (R.symm.trans L),
dsimp at t,
dsimp,
simpa only [limit.lift_π, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc, category.id_comp] using t,
end }, }.
@[simp] def equalizer_diagram.cones_inv [has_products.{v} C] {J} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ C) :
F.cones ⟶ (equalizer_diagram F).cones :=
{ app := λ X c,
begin
refine (fork.of_ι _ _).π,
{ exact pi.lift c.app },
{ ext f,
rcases f with ⟨⟨A,B⟩,f⟩,
dsimp,
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, fan.mk_π_app, category.assoc],
rw ←(c.naturality f),
dsimp,
simp only [category.id_comp], }
end,
naturality' := λ X Y f, by { ext c j, cases j; tidy, } }.
def equalizer_diagram.cones_iso [has_products.{v} C] {J} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ C) :
(equalizer_diagram F).cones ≅ F.cones :=
{ hom := equalizer_diagram.cones_hom F,
inv := equalizer_diagram.cones_inv F,
hom_inv_id' :=
begin
ext X c j,
cases j,
{ ext, simp },
{ ext,
have t := c.naturality walking_parallel_pair_hom.left,
conv at t { dsimp, to_lhs, simp only [category.id_comp] },
simp [t], }
end }
instance has_limit_of_has_products_of_has_equalizers [has_products.{v} C] [has_equalizers.{v} C] {J} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ C) :
has_limit.{v} F :=
has_limit.of_cones_iso (equalizer_diagram F) F (equalizer_diagram.cones_iso F)
def limits_from_equalizers_and_products
[has_products.{v} C] [has_equalizers.{v} C] : has_limits.{v} C :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_limit := λ F, by apply_instance } }
end category_theory.limits
|
b57ad444f5a7f7fdb4e70f7cf174ce2568e3659b | 41ebf3cb010344adfa84907b3304db00e02db0a6 | /uexp/src/uexp/rules/fkPennTR.lean | 27343dbad25d5c8b72ef0263a22d0a2488d16006 | [
"BSD-2-Clause"
] | permissive | ReinierKoops/Cosette | e061b2ba58b26f4eddf4cd052dcf7abd16dfe8fb | eb8dadd06ee05fe7b6b99de431dd7c4faef5cb29 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,483,953,198 | 1,624,293,498,000 | 1,624,293,498,000 | 378,997,885 | 0 | 0 | BSD-2-Clause | 1,624,293,485,000 | 1,624,293,484,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,855 | lean | import ..sql
import ..tactics
import ..u_semiring
import ..extra_constants
import ..meta.cosette_tactics
open Expr
open Proj
open Pred
open SQL
variable str_security_ : const datatypes.int
theorem rule :
forall (Γ scm_payroll scm_teams scm_depts : Schema)
(rel_payroll : relation scm_payroll)
(rel_teams : relation scm_teams)
(rel_depts : relation scm_depts)
(payroll_pdept : Column datatypes.int scm_payroll)
(payroll_empl : Column datatypes.int scm_payroll)
(teams_tproj : Column datatypes.int scm_teams)
(teams_tmember : Column datatypes.int scm_teams)
(depts_dname : Column datatypes.int scm_depts)
(depts_dproj : Column datatypes.int scm_depts)
(k : isKey payroll_empl rel_payroll)
(fk : fKey payroll_empl teams_tmember rel_payroll rel_teams k),
denoteSQL
(SELECT1 (right⋅right⋅teams_tmember)
FROM1 (product (table rel_depts) (table rel_teams))
WHERE (and (equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅depts_dproj))
(uvariable (right⋅right⋅teams_tproj)))
(equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅depts_dname))
(constantExpr str_security_))) : SQL Γ _) =
denoteSQL
(SELECT1 (right⋅left⋅right⋅right)
FROM1 (product ((SELECT1 (combine (right⋅left⋅depts_dname)
(combine (right⋅left⋅depts_dproj)
(right⋅right⋅payroll_empl)))
FROM1 (product (table rel_depts)
(table rel_payroll))
WHERE (equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅depts_dname))
(uvariable (right⋅right⋅payroll_pdept)))))
((SELECT1 (combine (right⋅left⋅teams_tmember)
(combine (right⋅right⋅payroll_pdept)
(right⋅left⋅teams_tproj)))
FROM1 (product (table rel_teams)
(table rel_payroll))
WHERE (equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅teams_tmember))
(uvariable (right⋅right⋅payroll_empl))))))
WHERE (and (and (and (equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅left))
(constantExpr str_security_))
(equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅right⋅left))
(uvariable (right⋅right⋅right⋅right))))
(equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅right⋅right))
(uvariable (right⋅right⋅left))))
(equal (uvariable (right⋅left⋅left))
(uvariable (right⋅right⋅right⋅left)))) : SQL Γ _) :=
begin
admit
end |
da8efd6615d2b1aed5b7df2015131fd4506ebaed | 85cd896397311530f27039b95aa3371919ce74cd | /sphinx/hanoi_project/ngaHW.lean | 72a6c138a5307e5cf0437acaa68b4ffe225f2a21 | [
"CC-BY-4.0"
] | permissive | ngamt/formalabstracts | 4c556378b417fea39f8a56447929a90fab9ad368 | 30cafc6c16cec733022babcdfbd9d81be5ae40bd | refs/heads/master | 1,584,621,015,487 | 1,528,685,558,000 | 1,528,685,558,000 | 136,272,052 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,528,259,509,000 | 1,528,259,508,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 661 | lean | open nat int
--check prime number
def isPrime (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
(n ≥ 2) ∧ (∀ m : ℕ , m ≥ 1 ∧ m ∣ n → (m = 1 ∨ m = n))
--GoldBach Conjecture
theorem goldBach (n : ℕ) : n > 2 →
∃ p q : ℕ , isPrime p ∧ isPrime q ∧ (n = p + q) :=
begin
admit,
end
-- Opperman Conjecture
def isOpperman (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
(∃ m : ℕ, m > n * n ∧ m < ( n + 1) * ( n + 1))
def infiniteSet (s: set ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ n : ℕ, ∃ m ∈ s, n < m
def setOfPrime :=
{m: ℕ | isPrime m ∧ (∃ n : ℕ, n>0 ∧ m = n * n +1 )}
-- n*n + 1 Conjecture
theorem theorem4: infiniteSet setOfPrime :=
begin
admit,
end
|
a421af6463ff866c2ca17855ed1b8945a50a9a65 | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/logic/unnamed_1531.lean | 2163b5cc0135d4005d58488636f34e6b8404242f | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 326 | lean | import data.real.basic
-- BEGIN
example {x y : ℝ} (h₀ : x ≤ y) (h₁ : ¬ y ≤ x) : x ≤ y ∧ x ≠ y :=
⟨h₀, λ h, h₁ (by rw h)⟩
example {x y : ℝ} (h₀ : x ≤ y) (h₁ : ¬ y ≤ x) : x ≤ y ∧ x ≠ y :=
begin
have h : x ≠ y,
{ contrapose! h₁,
rw h₁ },
exact ⟨h₀, h⟩
end
-- END |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.