blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9f2e60ea742c1b18c8fd078db20b5f1a4e8f410d | 9c1ad797ec8a5eddb37d34806c543602d9a6bf70 | /universal/comma_categories.lean | b7790b80a03203a84b826440e2f70f9f3dc3f67b | [] | no_license | timjb/lean-category-theory | 816eefc3a0582c22c05f4ee1c57ed04e57c0982f | 12916cce261d08bb8740bc85e0175b75fb2a60f4 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,078,926,765 | 1,492,080,000,000 | 1,492,080,000,000 | 88,348,246 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,492,262,499,000 | 1,492,262,498,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,467 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
import ..discrete_category
import ..graph
import .initial
open tqft.categories
open tqft.categories.isomorphism
open tqft.categories.graph
open tqft.categories.functor
open tqft.categories.natural_transformation
open tqft.categories.initial
namespace tqft.categories.comma
-- The diagonal functor sends X to the constant functor that sends everything to X.
definition DiagonalFunctor ( J C : Category ) : Functor C (FunctorCategory J C) :=
{
onObjects := λ X : C.Obj, {
onObjects := λ _, X,
onMorphisms := λ _ _ _, C.identity X,
identities := ♮,
functoriality := ♮
},
onMorphisms := λ X Y f, {
components := λ _, f,
naturality := ♮
},
identities := ♮,
functoriality := ♮
}
-- unfortunately one can't coerce along subtype.val
open subtype
local attribute [ematch] subtype.property
-- The elaborator has some trouble understanding what p.2.2 and q.2.2 mean below.
-- Leo suggested the following work-around, at <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lean-user/8jW4BIUFl24/MOtgbpfqCAAJ>.
local attribute [elab_simple] sigma.snd
definition CommaCategory
{ A B C : Category }
( S : Functor A C ) ( T : Functor B C ) : Category :=
{
Obj := Σ a : A.Obj, Σ b : B.Obj, C.Hom (S a) (T b),
Hom := λ p q, { gh : (A.Hom p.1 q.1) × (B.Hom p.2.1 q.2.1) // C.compose (S.onMorphisms gh.1) q.2.2 = C.compose p.2.2 (T.onMorphisms gh.2) },
identity := λ p, ⟨ (A.identity p.1, B.identity p.2.1), ♮ ⟩,
compose := λ p q r f g, ⟨ (A.compose (val f).1 (val g).1, B.compose (val f).2 (val g).2), ♮ ⟩,
left_identity := ♯,
right_identity := ♯,
associativity := ♮
}
definition ObjectAsFunctor { C : Category } ( X : C.Obj ) : Functor (DiscreteCategory unit) C :=
{
onObjects := λ _, X,
onMorphisms := λ _ _ _, C.identity X,
identities := ♮,
functoriality := ♮
}
definition SliceCategory { C : Category } ( X : C.Obj ) := CommaCategory (IdentityFunctor C) (ObjectAsFunctor X)
definition CosliceCategory { C : Category } ( X : C.Obj ) := CommaCategory (ObjectAsFunctor X) (IdentityFunctor C)
-- In Cones, we have
-- A = C
-- B = .
-- C = FunctorCategory J C
definition Cones { J C : Category } ( F : Functor J C ) := CommaCategory (DiagonalFunctor J C) (ObjectAsFunctor F)
definition Cocones { J C : Category } ( F : Functor J C ) := CommaCategory (@ObjectAsFunctor (FunctorCategory J C) F) (DiagonalFunctor J C)
definition Limit { J C : Category } ( F: Functor J C ) := TerminalObject (Cones F)
definition Colimit { J C : Category } ( F: Functor J C ) := InitialObject (Cocones F)
inductive Two : Type
| _0 : Two
| _1 : Two
open Two
definition WalkingPair : Graph := {
vertices := Two,
edges := λ X Y, empty
}
definition WalkingParallelPair : Graph := {
vertices := Two,
edges := λ X Y, match X, Y with
| _0, _1 := Two
| _, _ := empty
end
}
definition Pair_homomorphism { C : Category } ( α β : C.Obj ) : GraphHomomorphism WalkingPair C := {
onVertices := λ X, match X with
| _0 := α
| _1 := β
end,
onEdges := λ X Y e, match X, Y, e with end
}
definition ParallelPair_homomorphism { C : Category } { α β : C.Obj } ( f g : C.Hom α β ) : GraphHomomorphism WalkingParallelPair C := {
onVertices := λ X, match X with
| _0 := α
| _1 := β
end,
onEdges := λ X Y e, match X, Y, e with
| _0, _1, _0 := f
| _0, _1, _1 := g
end
}
definition Product { C : Category } ( α β : C.Obj ) := Limit (Functor.from_GraphHomomorphism (Pair_homomorphism α β))
definition Coproduct { C : Category } ( α β : C.Obj ) := Colimit (Functor.from_GraphHomomorphism (Pair_homomorphism α β))
definition Equalizer { C : Category } { α β : C.Obj } ( f g : C.Hom α β ) := Limit (Functor.from_GraphHomomorphism (ParallelPair_homomorphism f g))
definition Coequalizer { C : Category } { α β : C.Obj } ( f g : C.Hom α β ) := Colimit (Functor.from_GraphHomomorphism (ParallelPair_homomorphism f g))
end tqft.categories.comma
|
47dc97db77c5d94b2ab91eec16c988428f579e42 | a4673261e60b025e2c8c825dfa4ab9108246c32e | /tests/lean/run/175.lean | b5353fb7a796e01a36717758726b6436e36869aa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/lean4 | c02dec0cc32c4bccab009285475f265f17d73228 | 2909313475588cc20ac0436e55548a4502050d0a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,129,550,893 | 1,606,415,348,000 | 1,606,415,348,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 468 | lean | import Lean
namespace Foo
open Lean.Elab.Term
syntax[fooKind] "foo!" term : term
@[termElab fooKind] def elabFoo : TermElab :=
fun stx expectedType? => elabTerm (stx.getArg 1) expectedType?
#check foo! 10
end Foo
namespace Lean
namespace Elab
namespace Tactic
open Meta
@[builtinTactic clear] def myEvalClear : Tactic := -- this fails in the old-frontend because it eagerly resolves `clear` as `Lean.Meta.clear`.
fun _ => pure ()
end Tactic
end Elab
end Lean
|
ef6f82f4e6f9b41a78c32f2da45526e00bd94b27 | b70031c8e2c5337b91d7e70f1e0c5f528f7b0e77 | /src/category_theory/limits/preserves/functor_category.lean | 1620fd098ed4d8bf59542aa6d912b551f81fcce2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | molodiuc/mathlib | cae2ba3ef1601c1f42ca0b625c79b061b63fef5b | 98ebe5a6739fbe254f9ee9d401882d4388f91035 | refs/heads/master | 1,674,237,127,059 | 1,606,353,533,000 | 1,606,353,533,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,566 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.limits.presheaf
import category_theory.limits.functor_category
import category_theory.limits.shapes.constructions.preserve_binary_products
/-!
# Preservation of (co)limits in the functor category
Show that if `X ⨯ -` preserves colimits in `D` for any `X : D`, then the product functor `F ⨯ -`
for `F : C ⥤ D` preserves colimits.
The idea of the proof is simply that products and colimits in the functor category are computed
pointwise, so pointwise preservation implies general preservation.
# References
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/commutativity+of+limits+and+colimits#preservation_by_functor_categories_and_localizations
-/
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable theory
namespace category_theory
open category limits
variables {C : Type v₂} [category.{v₁} C]
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/--
If `X × -` preserves colimits in `D` for any `X : D`, then the product functor `F ⨯ -` for
`F : C ⥤ D` also preserves colimits.
Note this is (mathematically) a special case of the statement that
"if limits commute with colimits in `D`, then they do as well in `C ⥤ D`"
but the story in Lean is a bit more complex, and this statement isn't directly a special case.
That is, even with a formalised proof of the general statement, there would still need to be some
work to convert to this version: namely, the natural isomorphism
`(evaluation C D).obj k ⋙ prod.functor.obj (F.obj k) ≅ prod.functor.obj F ⋙ (evaluation C D).obj k`
-/
def functor_category.prod_preserves_colimits [has_binary_products D] [has_colimits D]
[∀ (X : D), preserves_colimits (prod.functor.obj X)]
(F : C ⥤ D) :
preserves_colimits (prod.functor.obj F) :=
{ preserves_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ preserves_colimit := λ K,
{ preserves := λ c t,
begin
apply evaluation_jointly_reflects_colimits _ (λ k, _),
change is_colimit ((prod.functor.obj F ⋙ (evaluation _ _).obj k).map_cocone c),
let := is_colimit_of_preserves ((evaluation C D).obj k ⋙ prod.functor.obj (F.obj k)) t,
apply is_colimit.map_cocone_equiv _ this,
apply (nat_iso.of_components _ _).symm,
{ intro G,
apply as_iso (prod_comparison ((evaluation C D).obj k) F G) },
{ intros G G',
apply prod_comparison_natural ((evaluation C D).obj k) (𝟙 F) },
end } } }
end category_theory
|
8d4e6b2c99d147d9e0b4e3d7e6fdd55c9a787f21 | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/topology/algebra/monoid.lean | 0029c24c058f285538221d8d006b4f0179d23e28 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,430 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import topology.continuous_on
import group_theory.submonoid.basic
import algebra.group.prod
import algebra.pointwise
/-!
# Theory of topological monoids
In this file we define mixin classes `has_continuous_mul` and `has_continuous_add`. While in many
applications the underlying type is a monoid (multiplicative or additive), we do not require this in
the definitions.
-/
open classical set filter topological_space
open_locale classical topological_space big_operators
variables {α β M N : Type*}
/-- Basic hypothesis to talk about a topological additive monoid or a topological additive
semigroup. A topological additive monoid over `α`, for example, is obtained by requiring both the
instances `add_monoid α` and `has_continuous_add α`. -/
class has_continuous_add (M : Type*) [topological_space M] [has_add M] : Prop :=
(continuous_add : continuous (λ p : M × M, p.1 + p.2))
/-- Basic hypothesis to talk about a topological monoid or a topological semigroup.
A topological monoid over `α`, for example, is obtained by requiring both the instances `monoid α`
and `has_continuous_mul α`. -/
@[to_additive]
class has_continuous_mul (M : Type*) [topological_space M] [has_mul M] : Prop :=
(continuous_mul : continuous (λ p : M × M, p.1 * p.2))
section has_continuous_mul
variables [topological_space M] [has_mul M] [has_continuous_mul M]
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_mul : continuous (λp:M×M, p.1 * p.2) :=
has_continuous_mul.continuous_mul
@[continuity, to_additive]
lemma continuous.mul [topological_space α] {f : α → M} {g : α → M}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
continuous (λx, f x * g x) :=
continuous_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
-- should `to_additive` be doing this?
attribute [continuity] continuous.add
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_mul_left (a : M) : continuous (λ b:M, a * b) :=
continuous_const.mul continuous_id
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_mul_right (a : M) : continuous (λ b:M, b * a) :=
continuous_id.mul continuous_const
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_on.mul [topological_space α] {f : α → M} {g : α → M} {s : set α}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) :
continuous_on (λx, f x * g x) s :=
(continuous_mul.comp_continuous_on (hf.prod hg) : _)
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_mul {a b : M} : tendsto (λp:M×M, p.fst * p.snd) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp has_continuous_mul.continuous_mul (a, b)
@[to_additive]
lemma filter.tendsto.mul {f : α → M} {g : α → M} {x : filter α} {a b : M}
(hf : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
tendsto (λx, f x * g x) x (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
tendsto_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto.const_mul (b : M) {c : M} {f : α → M} {l : filter α}
(h : tendsto (λ (k:α), f k) l (𝓝 c)) : tendsto (λ (k:α), b * f k) l (𝓝 (b * c)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.mul h
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto.mul_const (b : M) {c : M} {f : α → M} {l : filter α}
(h : tendsto (λ (k:α), f k) l (𝓝 c)) : tendsto (λ (k:α), f k * b) l (𝓝 (c * b)) :=
h.mul tendsto_const_nhds
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_at.mul [topological_space α] {f : α → M} {g : α → M} {x : α}
(hf : continuous_at f x) (hg : continuous_at g x) :
continuous_at (λx, f x * g x) x :=
hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_within_at.mul [topological_space α] {f : α → M} {g : α → M} {s : set α} {x : α}
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (hg : continuous_within_at g s x) :
continuous_within_at (λx, f x * g x) s x :=
hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
instance [topological_space N] [has_mul N] [has_continuous_mul N] : has_continuous_mul (M × N) :=
⟨((continuous_fst.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)).prod_mk
((continuous_snd.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))⟩
@[priority 100, to_additive]
instance has_continuous_mul_of_discrete_topology [topological_space N]
[has_mul N] [discrete_topology N] : has_continuous_mul N :=
⟨continuous_of_discrete_topology⟩
open_locale filter
open function
@[to_additive]
lemma has_continuous_mul.of_nhds_one {M : Type*} [monoid M] [topological_space M]
(hmul : tendsto (uncurry ((*) : M → M → M)) (𝓝 1 ×ᶠ 𝓝 1) $ 𝓝 1)
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : M, 𝓝 x₀ = map (λ x, x₀*x) (𝓝 1))
(hright : ∀ x₀ : M, 𝓝 x₀ = map (λ x, x*x₀) (𝓝 1)) : has_continuous_mul M :=
⟨begin
rw continuous_iff_continuous_at,
rintros ⟨x₀, y₀⟩,
have key : (λ p : M × M, x₀ * p.1 * (p.2 * y₀)) = ((λ x, x₀*x) ∘ (λ x, x*y₀)) ∘ (uncurry (*)),
{ ext p, simp [uncurry, mul_assoc] },
have key₂ : (λ x, x₀*x) ∘ (λ x, y₀*x) = λ x, (x₀ *y₀)*x,
{ ext x, simp },
calc map (uncurry (*)) (𝓝 (x₀, y₀))
= map (uncurry (*)) (𝓝 x₀ ×ᶠ 𝓝 y₀) : by rw nhds_prod_eq
... = map (λ (p : M × M), x₀ * p.1 * (p.2 * y₀)) ((𝓝 1) ×ᶠ (𝓝 1))
: by rw [uncurry, hleft x₀, hright y₀, prod_map_map_eq, filter.map_map]
... = map ((λ x, x₀ * x) ∘ λ x, x * y₀) (map (uncurry (*)) (𝓝 1 ×ᶠ 𝓝 1))
: by { rw [key, ← filter.map_map], }
... ≤ map ((λ (x : M), x₀ * x) ∘ λ x, x * y₀) (𝓝 1) : map_mono hmul
... = 𝓝 (x₀*y₀) : by rw [← filter.map_map, ← hright, hleft y₀, filter.map_map, key₂, ← hleft]
end⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma has_continuous_mul_of_comm_of_nhds_one (M : Type*) [comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
(hmul : tendsto (uncurry ((*) : M → M → M)) (𝓝 1 ×ᶠ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : M, 𝓝 x₀ = map (λ x, x₀*x) (𝓝 1)) : has_continuous_mul M :=
begin
apply has_continuous_mul.of_nhds_one hmul hleft,
intros x₀,
simp_rw [mul_comm, hleft x₀]
end
end has_continuous_mul
section has_continuous_mul
variables [topological_space M] [monoid M] [has_continuous_mul M]
@[to_additive]
lemma submonoid.top_closure_mul_self_subset (s : submonoid M) :
(closure (s : set M)) * closure (s : set M) ⊆ closure (s : set M) :=
calc
(closure (s : set M)) * closure (s : set M)
= (λ p : M × M, p.1 * p.2) '' (closure ((s : set M).prod s)) : by simp [closure_prod_eq]
... ⊆ closure ((λ p : M × M, p.1 * p.2) '' ((s : set M).prod s)) :
image_closure_subset_closure_image continuous_mul
... = closure s : by simp [s.coe_mul_self_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma submonoid.top_closure_mul_self_eq (s : submonoid M) :
(closure (s : set M)) * closure (s : set M) = closure (s : set M) :=
subset.antisymm
s.top_closure_mul_self_subset
(λ x hx, ⟨x, 1, hx, subset_closure s.one_mem, mul_one _⟩)
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a submonoid of a space `M` with `has_continuous_mul` is
itself a submonoid. -/
@[to_additive "The (topological-space) closure of an additive submonoid of a space `M` with
`has_continuous_add` is itself an additive submonoid."]
def submonoid.topological_closure (s : submonoid M) : submonoid M :=
{ carrier := closure (s : set M),
one_mem' := subset_closure s.one_mem,
mul_mem' := λ a b ha hb, s.top_closure_mul_self_subset ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩ }
lemma submonoid.submonoid_topological_closure (s : submonoid M) :
s ≤ s.topological_closure :=
subset_closure
lemma submonoid.is_closed_topological_closure (s : submonoid M) :
is_closed (s.topological_closure : set M) :=
by convert is_closed_closure
lemma submonoid.topological_closure_minimal
(s : submonoid M) {t : submonoid M} (h : s ≤ t) (ht : is_closed (t : set M)) :
s.topological_closure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
@[to_additive exists_open_nhds_zero_half]
lemma exists_open_nhds_one_split {s : set M} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (1 : M)) :
∃ V : set M, is_open V ∧ (1 : M) ∈ V ∧ ∀ (v ∈ V) (w ∈ V), v * w ∈ s :=
have ((λa:M×M, a.1 * a.2) ⁻¹' s) ∈ 𝓝 ((1, 1) : M × M),
from tendsto_mul (by simpa only [one_mul] using hs),
by simpa only [prod_subset_iff] using exists_nhds_square this
@[to_additive exists_nhds_zero_half]
lemma exists_nhds_one_split {s : set M} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (1 : M)) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : M), ∀ (v ∈ V) (w ∈ V), v * w ∈ s :=
let ⟨V, Vo, V1, hV⟩ := exists_open_nhds_one_split hs
in ⟨V, mem_nhds_sets Vo V1, hV⟩
@[to_additive exists_nhds_zero_quarter]
lemma exists_nhds_one_split4 {u : set M} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝 (1 : M)) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : M),
∀ {v w s t}, v ∈ V → w ∈ V → s ∈ V → t ∈ V → v * w * s * t ∈ u :=
begin
rcases exists_nhds_one_split hu with ⟨W, W1, h⟩,
rcases exists_nhds_one_split W1 with ⟨V, V1, h'⟩,
use [V, V1],
intros v w s t v_in w_in s_in t_in,
simpa only [mul_assoc] using h _ (h' v v_in w w_in) _ (h' s s_in t t_in)
end
/-- Given a neighborhood `U` of `1` there is an open neighborhood `V` of `1`
such that `VV ⊆ U`. -/
@[to_additive "Given a open neighborhood `U` of `0` there is a open neighborhood `V` of `0`
such that `V + V ⊆ U`."]
lemma exists_open_nhds_one_mul_subset {U : set M} (hU : U ∈ 𝓝 (1 : M)) :
∃ V : set M, is_open V ∧ (1 : M) ∈ V ∧ V * V ⊆ U :=
begin
rcases exists_open_nhds_one_split hU with ⟨V, Vo, V1, hV⟩,
use [V, Vo, V1],
rintros _ ⟨x, y, hx, hy, rfl⟩,
exact hV _ hx _ hy
end
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_list_prod {f : β → α → M} {x : filter α} {a : β → M} :
∀l:list β, (∀c∈l, tendsto (f c) x (𝓝 (a c))) →
tendsto (λb, (l.map (λc, f c b)).prod) x (𝓝 ((l.map a).prod))
| [] _ := by simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
| (f :: l) h :=
begin
simp only [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons],
exact (h f (list.mem_cons_self _ _)).mul
(tendsto_list_prod l (assume c hc, h c (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ hc)))
end
@[to_additive]
lemma continuous_list_prod [topological_space α] {f : β → α → M} (l : list β)
(h : ∀c∈l, continuous (f c)) :
continuous (λa, (l.map (λc, f c a)).prod) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ assume x, tendsto_list_prod l $ assume c hc,
continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 (h c hc) x
-- @[to_additive continuous_smul]
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, continuous (λ a : M, a ^ n)
| 0 := by simpa using continuous_const
| (k+1) := show continuous (λ (a : M), a * a ^ k), from continuous_id.mul (continuous_pow _)
@[continuity]
lemma continuous.pow {f : α → M} [topological_space α] (h : continuous f) (n : ℕ) :
continuous (λ b, (f b) ^ n) :=
continuous.comp (continuous_pow n) h
end has_continuous_mul
section
variables [topological_space M] [comm_monoid M]
@[to_additive]
lemma submonoid.mem_nhds_one (S : submonoid M) (oS : is_open (S : set M)) :
(S : set M) ∈ 𝓝 (1 : M) :=
mem_nhds_sets oS S.one_mem
variable [has_continuous_mul M]
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_multiset_prod {f : β → α → M} {x : filter α} {a : β → M} (s : multiset β) :
(∀c∈s, tendsto (f c) x (𝓝 (a c))) →
tendsto (λb, (s.map (λc, f c b)).prod) x (𝓝 ((s.map a).prod)) :=
by { rcases s with ⟨l⟩, simp, exact tendsto_list_prod l }
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_finset_prod {f : β → α → M} {x : filter α} {a : β → M} (s : finset β) :
(∀c∈s, tendsto (f c) x (𝓝 (a c))) → tendsto (λb, ∏ c in s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c in s, a c)) :=
tendsto_multiset_prod _
@[to_additive, continuity]
lemma continuous_multiset_prod [topological_space α] {f : β → α → M} (s : multiset β) :
(∀c∈s, continuous (f c)) → continuous (λa, (s.map (λc, f c a)).prod) :=
by { rcases s with ⟨l⟩, simp, exact continuous_list_prod l }
attribute [continuity] continuous_multiset_sum
@[continuity, to_additive]
lemma continuous_finset_prod [topological_space α] {f : β → α → M} (s : finset β) :
(∀c∈s, continuous (f c)) → continuous (λa, ∏ c in s, f c a) :=
continuous_multiset_prod _
-- should `to_additive` be doing this?
attribute [continuity] continuous_finset_sum
end
instance additive.has_continuous_add {M} [h : topological_space M] [has_mul M]
[has_continuous_mul M] : @has_continuous_add (additive M) h _ :=
{ continuous_add := @continuous_mul M _ _ _ }
instance multiplicative.has_continuous_mul {M} [h : topological_space M] [has_add M]
[has_continuous_add M] : @has_continuous_mul (multiplicative M) h _ :=
{ continuous_mul := @continuous_add M _ _ _ }
|
31826ee6e8fc8998cdf0f8911f95c6ac869c365a | 66a6486e19b71391cc438afee5f081a4257564ec | /pointed.hlean | 7ee1e9806dcfce9d0581e107ec14f34324a4a289 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | spiceghello/Spectral | c8ccd1e32d4b6a9132ccee20fcba44b477cd0331 | 20023aa3de27c22ab9f9b4a177f5a1efdec2b19f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,263,374,078 | 1,523,349,717,000 | 1,523,349,717,000 | 92,312,239 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,495,642,470,000 | 1,495,642,470,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,409 | hlean | /- equalities between pointed homotopies and other facts about pointed types/functions/homotopies -/
-- Author: Floris van Doorn
import types.pointed2 .move_to_lib
open pointed eq equiv function is_equiv unit is_trunc trunc nat algebra sigma group lift option
namespace pointed
-- /- the pointed type of (unpointed) dependent maps -/
-- definition pupi [constructor] {A : Type} (P : A → Type*) : Type* :=
-- pointed.mk' (Πa, P a)
-- definition loop_pupi_commute {A : Type} (B : A → Type*) : Ω(pupi B) ≃* pupi (λa, Ω (B a)) :=
-- pequiv_of_equiv eq_equiv_homotopy rfl
-- definition equiv_pupi_right {A : Type} {P Q : A → Type*} (g : Πa, P a ≃* Q a)
-- : pupi P ≃* pupi Q :=
-- pequiv_of_equiv (pi_equiv_pi_right g)
-- begin esimp, apply eq_of_homotopy, intros a, esimp, exact (respect_pt (g a)) end
-- definition pmap_eq_equiv {X Y : Type*} (f g : X →* Y) : (f = g) ≃ (f ~* g) :=
-- begin
-- refine eq_equiv_fn_eq_of_equiv (@pmap.sigma_char X Y) f g ⬝e _,
-- refine !sigma_eq_equiv ⬝e _,
-- refine _ ⬝e (phomotopy.sigma_char f g)⁻¹ᵉ,
-- fapply sigma_equiv_sigma,
-- { esimp, apply eq_equiv_homotopy },
-- { induction g with g gp, induction Y with Y y0, esimp, intro p, induction p, esimp at *,
-- refine !pathover_idp ⬝e _, refine _ ⬝e !eq_equiv_eq_symm,
-- apply equiv_eq_closed_right, exact !idp_con⁻¹ }
-- end
definition ppcompose_left_pid [constructor] (A B : Type*) : ppcompose_left (pid B) ~* pid (ppmap A B) :=
phomotopy_mk_ppmap (λf, pid_pcompose f) (!trans_refl ⬝ !phomotopy_of_eq_of_phomotopy⁻¹)
definition ppcompose_right_pid [constructor] (A B : Type*) : ppcompose_right (pid A) ~* pid (ppmap A B) :=
phomotopy_mk_ppmap (λf, pcompose_pid f) (!trans_refl ⬝ !phomotopy_of_eq_of_phomotopy⁻¹)
/- remove some duplicates: loop_ppmap_commute, loop_ppmap_pequiv, loop_ppmap_pequiv', pfunext -/
definition pfunext (X Y : Type*) : ppmap X (Ω Y) ≃* Ω (ppmap X Y) :=
(loop_ppmap_commute X Y)⁻¹ᵉ*
definition loop_phomotopy [constructor] {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : Type* :=
pointed.MK (f ~* f) phomotopy.rfl
definition ppcompose_left_loop_phomotopy [constructor] {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* C) {f : A →* B}
{h : A →* C} (p : g ∘* f ~* h) : loop_phomotopy f →* loop_phomotopy h :=
pmap.mk (λq, p⁻¹* ⬝* pwhisker_left g q ⬝* p)
(idp ◾** !pwhisker_left_refl ◾** idp ⬝ !trans_refl ◾** idp ⬝ !trans_left_inv)
definition ppcompose_left_loop_phomotopy' [constructor] {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* C) (f : A →* B)
: loop_phomotopy f →* loop_phomotopy (g ∘* f) :=
pmap.mk (λq, pwhisker_left g q) !pwhisker_left_refl
definition loop_ppmap_pequiv' [constructor] (A B : Type*) :
Ω(ppmap A B) ≃* loop_phomotopy (pconst A B) :=
pequiv_of_equiv (pmap_eq_equiv _ _) idp
definition ppmap_loop_pequiv' [constructor] (A B : Type*) :
loop_phomotopy (pconst A B) ≃* ppmap A (Ω B) :=
pequiv_of_equiv (!phomotopy.sigma_char ⬝e !pmap.sigma_char⁻¹ᵉ) idp
definition loop_ppmap_pequiv [constructor] (A B : Type*) : Ω(ppmap A B) ≃* ppmap A (Ω B) :=
loop_ppmap_pequiv' A B ⬝e* ppmap_loop_pequiv' A B
definition loop_ppmap_pequiv'_natural_right' {X X' : Type} (x₀ : X) (A : Type*) (f : X → X') :
psquare (loop_ppmap_pequiv' A _) (loop_ppmap_pequiv' A _)
(Ω→ (ppcompose_left (pmap_of_map f x₀)))
(ppcompose_left_loop_phomotopy' (pmap_of_map f x₀) !pconst) :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ esimp, intro p,
refine _ ⬝ ap011 (λx y, phomotopy_of_eq (ap1_gen _ x y _))
proof !eq_of_phomotopy_refl⁻¹ qed proof !eq_of_phomotopy_refl⁻¹ qed,
refine _ ⬝ ap phomotopy_of_eq !ap1_gen_idp_left⁻¹,
exact !phomotopy_of_eq_pcompose_left⁻¹ },
{ refine _ ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹, exact sorry }
end
definition loop_ppmap_pequiv'_natural_right {X X' : Type*} (A : Type*) (f : X →* X') :
psquare (loop_ppmap_pequiv' A X) (loop_ppmap_pequiv' A X')
(Ω→ (ppcompose_left f)) (ppcompose_left_loop_phomotopy f !pcompose_pconst) :=
begin
induction X' with X' x₀', induction f with f f₀, esimp at f, esimp at f₀, induction f₀,
apply psquare_of_phomotopy,
exact sorry
end
definition ppmap_loop_pequiv'_natural_right {X X' : Type*} (A : Type*) (f : X →* X') :
psquare (ppmap_loop_pequiv' A X) (ppmap_loop_pequiv' A X')
(ppcompose_left_loop_phomotopy f !pcompose_pconst) (ppcompose_left (Ω→ f)) :=
begin
exact sorry
end
definition loop_pmap_commute_natural_right_direct {X X' : Type*} (A : Type*) (f : X →* X') :
psquare (loop_ppmap_pequiv A X) (loop_ppmap_pequiv A X')
(Ω→ (ppcompose_left f)) (ppcompose_left (Ω→ f)) :=
begin
induction X' with X' x₀', induction f with f f₀, esimp at f, esimp at f₀, induction f₀,
-- refine _ ⬝* _ ◾* _, rotate 4,
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro p, esimp, esimp [pmap_eq_equiv, pcompose_pconst], exact sorry },
{ exact sorry }
end
definition loop_pmap_commute_natural_left {A A' : Type*} (X : Type*) (f : A' →* A) :
psquare (loop_ppmap_commute A X) (loop_ppmap_commute A' X)
(Ω→ (ppcompose_right f)) (ppcompose_right f) :=
sorry
definition loop_pmap_commute_natural_right {X X' : Type*} (A : Type*) (f : X →* X') :
psquare (loop_ppmap_commute A X) (loop_ppmap_commute A X')
(Ω→ (ppcompose_left f)) (ppcompose_left (Ω→ f)) :=
loop_ppmap_pequiv'_natural_right A f ⬝h* ppmap_loop_pequiv'_natural_right A f
/-
Do we want to use a structure of homotopies between pointed homotopies? Or are equalities fine?
If we set up things more generally, we could define this as
"pointed homotopies between the dependent pointed maps p and q"
-/
structure phomotopy2 {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* B} (p q : f ~* g) : Type :=
(homotopy_eq : p ~ q)
(homotopy_pt_eq : whisker_right (respect_pt g) (homotopy_eq pt) ⬝ to_homotopy_pt q =
to_homotopy_pt p)
/- this sets it up more generally, for illustrative purposes -/
structure ppi' (A : Type*) (P : A → Type) (p : P pt) :=
(to_fun : Π a : A, P a)
(resp_pt : to_fun (Point A) = p)
attribute ppi'.to_fun [coercion]
definition phomotopy' {A : Type*} {P : A → Type} {x : P pt} (f g : ppi' A P x) : Type :=
ppi' A (λa, f a = g a) (ppi'.resp_pt f ⬝ (ppi'.resp_pt g)⁻¹)
definition phomotopy2' {A : Type*} {P : A → Type} {x : P pt} {f g : ppi' A P x}
(p q : phomotopy' f g) : Type :=
phomotopy' p q
-- infix ` ~*2 `:50 := phomotopy2
-- variables {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* B} (p q : f ~* g)
-- definition phomotopy_eq_equiv_phomotopy2 : p = q ≃ p ~*2 q :=
-- sorry
/- Homotopy between a function and its eta expansion -/
definition pmap_eta {X Y : Type*} (f : X →* Y) : f ~* pmap.mk f (respect_pt f) :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
reflexivity,
esimp, exact !idp_con
end
-- this should replace pnatural_square
definition pnatural_square2 {A B : Type} (X : B → Type*) (Y : B → Type*) {f g : A → B}
(h : Πa, X (f a) →* Y (g a)) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
h a' ∘* ptransport X (ap f p) ~* ptransport Y (ap g p) ∘* h a :=
by induction p; exact !pcompose_pid ⬝* !pid_pcompose⁻¹*
definition ptransport_ap {A B : Type} (X : B → Type*) (f : A → B) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
ptransport X (ap f p) ~* ptransport (X ∘ f) p :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ptransport_constant (A : Type) (B : Type*) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
ptransport (λ(a : A), B) p ~* pid B :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ptransport_natural {A : Type} (X : A → Type*) (Y : A → Type*)
(h : Πa, X a →* Y a) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
h a' ∘* ptransport X p ~* ptransport Y p ∘* h a :=
by induction p; exact !pcompose_pid ⬝* !pid_pcompose⁻¹*
section psquare
variables {A A' A₀₀ A₂₀ A₄₀ A₀₂ A₂₂ A₄₂ A₀₄ A₂₄ A₄₄ : Type*}
{f₁₀ f₁₀' : A₀₀ →* A₂₀} {f₃₀ : A₂₀ →* A₄₀}
{f₀₁ f₀₁' : A₀₀ →* A₀₂} {f₂₁ f₂₁' : A₂₀ →* A₂₂} {f₄₁ : A₄₀ →* A₄₂}
{f₁₂ f₁₂' : A₀₂ →* A₂₂} {f₃₂ : A₂₂ →* A₄₂}
{f₀₃ : A₀₂ →* A₀₄} {f₂₃ : A₂₂ →* A₂₄} {f₄₃ : A₄₂ →* A₄₄}
{f₁₄ : A₀₄ →* A₂₄} {f₃₄ : A₂₄ →* A₄₄}
definition ptranspose (p : psquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) : psquare f₀₁ f₂₁ f₁₀ f₁₂ :=
p⁻¹*
definition hsquare_of_psquare (p : psquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁ :=
p
definition homotopy_group_functor_hsquare (n : ℕ) (h : psquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) :
psquare (π→[n] f₁₀) (π→[n] f₁₂)
(π→[n] f₀₁) (π→[n] f₂₁) :=
sorry
end psquare
definition ap1_pequiv_ap {A : Type} (B : A → Type*) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
Ω→ (pequiv_ap B p) ~* pequiv_ap (Ω ∘ B) p :=
begin induction p, apply ap1_pid end
definition pequiv_ap_natural {A : Type} (B C : A → Type*) {a a' : A} (p : a = a')
(f : Πa, B a →* C a) :
psquare (pequiv_ap B p) (pequiv_ap C p) (f a) (f a') :=
begin induction p, exact phrfl end
definition is_contr_loop (A : Type*) [is_set A] : is_contr (Ω A) :=
is_contr.mk idp (λa, !is_prop.elim)
definition is_contr_loop_of_is_contr {A : Type*} (H : is_contr A) : is_contr (Ω A) :=
is_contr_loop A
definition is_contr_punit [instance] : is_contr punit :=
is_contr_unit
definition pequiv_of_is_contr (A B : Type*) (HA : is_contr A) (HB : is_contr B) : A ≃* B :=
pequiv_punit_of_is_contr A _ ⬝e* (pequiv_punit_of_is_contr B _)⁻¹ᵉ*
definition loop_pequiv_punit_of_is_set (X : Type*) [is_set X] : Ω X ≃* punit :=
pequiv_punit_of_is_contr _ (is_contr_loop X)
definition loop_punit : Ω punit ≃* punit :=
loop_pequiv_punit_of_is_set punit
definition add_point_functor' [unfold 4] {A B : Type} (e : A → B) (a : A₊) : B₊ :=
begin induction a with a, exact none, exact some (e a) end
definition add_point_functor [constructor] {A B : Type} (e : A → B) : A₊ →* B₊ :=
pmap.mk (add_point_functor' e) idp
definition add_point_functor_compose {A B C : Type} (f : B → C) (e : A → B) :
add_point_functor (f ∘ e) ~* add_point_functor f ∘* add_point_functor e :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x: reflexivity },
reflexivity
end
definition add_point_functor_id (A : Type) :
add_point_functor id ~* pid A₊ :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x: reflexivity },
reflexivity
end
definition add_point_functor_phomotopy {A B : Type} {e e' : A → B} (p : e ~ e') :
add_point_functor e ~* add_point_functor e' :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x with a, reflexivity, exact ap some (p a) },
reflexivity
end
definition add_point_pequiv {A B : Type} (e : A ≃ B) : A₊ ≃* B₊ :=
pequiv.MK (add_point_functor e) (add_point_functor e⁻¹ᵉ)
abstract !add_point_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* add_point_functor_phomotopy (left_inv e) ⬝*
!add_point_functor_id end
abstract !add_point_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* add_point_functor_phomotopy (right_inv e) ⬝*
!add_point_functor_id end
definition add_point_over [unfold 3] {A : Type} (B : A → Type*) : A₊ → Type*
| (some a) := B a
| none := plift punit
definition add_point_over_pequiv {A : Type} {B B' : A → Type*} (e : Πa, B a ≃* B' a) :
Π(a : A₊), add_point_over B a ≃* add_point_over B' a
| (some a) := e a
| none := pequiv.rfl
definition phomotopy_group_plift_punit.{u} (n : ℕ) [H : is_at_least_two n] :
πag[n] (plift.{0 u} punit) ≃g trivial_ab_group_lift.{u} :=
begin
induction H with n,
have H : 0 <[ℕ] n+2, from !zero_lt_succ,
have is_set unit, from _,
have is_trunc (trunc_index.of_nat 0) punit, from this,
exact isomorphism_of_is_contr (@trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ _ _ !is_trunc_lift H)
!is_trunc_lift
end
definition pmap_of_map_pt [constructor] {A : Type*} {B : Type} (f : A → B) :
A →* pointed.MK B (f pt) :=
pmap.mk f idp
/- TODO: computation rule -/
open pi
definition fiberwise_pointed_map_rec {A : Type} {B : A → Type*}
(P : Π(C : A → Type*) (g : Πa, B a →* C a), Type)
(H : Π(C : A → Type) (g : Πa, B a → C a), P _ (λa, pmap_of_map_pt (g a))) :
Π⦃C : A → Type*⦄ (g : Πa, B a →* C a), P C g :=
begin
refine equiv_rect (!sigma_pi_equiv_pi_sigma ⬝e
arrow_equiv_arrow_right A !pType.sigma_char⁻¹ᵉ) _ _,
intro R, cases R with R r₀,
refine equiv_rect (!sigma_pi_equiv_pi_sigma ⬝e
pi_equiv_pi_right (λa, !pmap.sigma_char⁻¹ᵉ)) _ _,
intro g, cases g with g g₀, esimp at (g, g₀),
revert g₀, change (Π(g : (λa, g a (Point (B a))) ~ r₀), _),
refine homotopy.rec_idp _ _, esimp,
apply H
end
definition ap1_gen_idp_eq {A B : Type} (f : A → B) {a : A} (q : f a = f a) (r : q = idp) :
ap1_gen_idp f q = ap (λx, ap1_gen f x x idp) r :=
begin cases r, reflexivity end
end pointed
|
390ee8d3d0bef9d581d3fcf3cb0ce73a03e40535 | f083c4ed5d443659f3ed9b43b1ca5bb037ddeb58 | /category_theory/opposites.lean | 1ccdaf14731bbb7e2b8a48f3de9c4b6ec0151d35 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | semorrison/mathlib | 1be6f11086e0d24180fec4b9696d3ec58b439d10 | 20b4143976dad48e664c4847b75a85237dca0a89 | refs/heads/master | 1,583,799,212,170 | 1,535,634,130,000 | 1,535,730,505,000 | 129,076,205 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,551,697,998,000 | 1,523,442,265,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,177 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
import category_theory.functor
import category_theory.products
import category_theory.types
namespace category_theory
universes u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂
def op (C : Type u₁) : Type u₁ := C
notation C `ᵒᵖ` := op C
variables {C : Type u₁} [𝒞 : category.{u₁ v₁} C]
include 𝒞
instance opposite : category.{u₁ v₁} (Cᵒᵖ) :=
{ hom := λ X Y : C, Y ⟶ X,
comp := λ _ _ _ f g, g ≫ f,
id := λ X, 𝟙 X,
id_comp' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, simp end,
comp_id' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, simp end,
assoc' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, simp end }
namespace functor
section
variables {D : Type u₂} [𝒟 : category.{u₂ v₂} D]
include 𝒟
protected definition op (F : C ↝ D) : (Cᵒᵖ) ↝ (Dᵒᵖ) :=
{ obj := λ X, F X,
map' := λ X Y f, F.map f,
map_id' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, erw [map_id], refl, end,
map_comp' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, erw [map_comp], refl end }
@[simp] lemma opposite_obj (F : C ↝ D) (X : C) : (F.op) X = F X := rfl
@[simp] lemma opposite_map (F : C ↝ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (F.op).map f = F.map f := rfl
end
variable (C)
/-- `functor.hom` is the hom-pairing, sending (X,Y) to X → Y, contravariant in X and covariant in Y. -/
definition hom : (Cᵒᵖ × C) ↝ (Type v₁) :=
{ obj := λ p, @category.hom C _ p.1 p.2,
map' := λ X Y f, λ h, f.1 ≫ h ≫ f.2,
map_id' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, ext, intros, cases X, dsimp at *, simp, erw [category.id_comp] end,
map_comp' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, ext, intros, cases f, cases g, cases X, cases Y, cases Z, dsimp at *, simp, erw [category.assoc] end }
@[simp] lemma hom_obj (X : Cᵒᵖ × C) : (functor.hom C) X = @category.hom C _ X.1 X.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma hom_pairing_map {X Y : Cᵒᵖ × C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (functor.hom C).map f = λ h, f.1 ≫ h ≫ f.2 := rfl
end functor
end category_theory |
9c839fd31935732d81fc7edd6ca63adf96322ad3 | 75c54c8946bb4203e0aaf196f918424a17b0de99 | /src/parse_formula.lean | 992eb01e19c4a932d7d019af53845b12346b5137 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/flypitch | 261e2a45f1038130178575406df8aea78255ba77 | 2250f5eda14b6ef9fc3e4e1f4a9ac4005634de5c | refs/heads/master | 1,653,266,469,246 | 1,577,819,679,000 | 1,577,819,679,000 | 259,862,235 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,588,147,244,000 | 1,588,147,244,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,044 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 The Flypitch Project. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author(s): Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
Parsing formulas from Lean expressions.
-/
import .abel .fol tactic data.list
universe u
/- toy example by Mario -/
section fmla
@[derive has_reflect]
inductive fmla
| var : nat → fmla
| pi : fmla → fmla
meta def to_fmla : pexpr → option fmla
| (expr.var n) := some (fmla.var n)
| (expr.pi _ _ _ e) := fmla.pi <$> to_fmla e
| _ := none
end fmla
namespace tactic
namespace interactive
section parse_fmla
open interactive interactive.types expr
meta def parse_fmla (e : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do f <- to_fmla e, tactic.exact `(f)
end parse_fmla
end interactive
end tactic
def foo : fmla := by parse_fmla (∀ x : ℕ, x)
-- #print foo -- fmla.pi (fmla.var 0)
/- end toy example -/
open fol
meta instance preterm.reflect {L : Language.{0}} [reflected L] [∀ n, has_reflect (L.functions n)] :
∀{n}, has_reflect (preterm L n)
| _ &k := `(&k)
| _ (func f) := `(func f)
| _ (app t₁ t₂) := (`(λ x y, app x y).subst (preterm.reflect t₁)).subst (preterm.reflect t₂)
meta instance preformula.reflect {L : Language.{0}} [reflected L] [∀ n, has_reflect (L.functions n)]
[∀ n, has_reflect (L.relations n)] : ∀{n}, has_reflect (preformula L n)
| _ falsum := `(falsum)
| _ (equal t₁ t₂) := (`(λ x₁ x₂, equal x₁ x₂).subst (preterm.reflect t₁)).subst (preterm.reflect t₂)
| _ (rel R) := `(λ x, preformula.rel x).subst `(R)
| _ (apprel f t) := (`(λ x₁ x₂, apprel x₁ x₂).subst (preformula.reflect f)).subst (preterm.reflect t)
| _ (imp f₁ f₂) := (`(λ x₁ x₂, imp x₁ x₂).subst (preformula.reflect f₁)).subst (preformula.reflect f₂)
| _ (all f) := `(λ x, all x).subst (preformula.reflect f)
meta instance L_empty.reflect : reflected L_empty := by apply_instance
meta instance L_empty_functions_reflect : ∀ n, has_reflect (L_empty.functions n) :=
λ _ _, empty.elim ‹_›
meta instance L_empty_relations_reflect : ∀ n, has_reflect (L_empty.relations n) :=
λ _ _, empty.elim ‹_›
section L_empty_parse
meta def to_term_empty : Π {n : ℕ}, expr → option (preterm L_empty n)
| 0 (expr.var k) := some (var k)
| _ _ := none
-- TODO(jesse) insert a case analysis on whether e' : Prop to determine whether or not to use imp
meta def to_formula_empty : Π {n : ℕ}, expr → option (preformula L_empty n)
| 0 (expr.pi _ _ e' e) := ((to_formula_empty e) >>= (λ f, return (all f)))
| 0 `(%%a = %%b) := do e₁ <- to_term_empty a, e₂ <- to_term_empty b,
return $ equal e₁ e₂
-- | 0 `(%%a → %%b) := do e₁ <- to_formula_empty a, e₂ <- to_formula_empty b,
-- return $ imp e₁ e₂ -- equation compiler thinks this case
-- is redundant since a → b compiles to Π _ : a, b
| 0 `(false) := return (falsum)
| 0 _ := none
| (n+1) _ := none
end L_empty_parse
namespace tactic
namespace interactive
open interactive interactive.types expr
meta def parse_formula (t : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do f <- ((@to_formula_empty 0) <$> (to_expr t)),
match f with
| (some ϕ) := tactic.exact `(ϕ)
| none := tactic.fail "to_formula_empty failed to parse"
end
end interactive
end tactic
-- meta def test : expr := `(true → true)
-- meta def test' : expr := `(∀ x : ℕ, x = 0)
-- #eval (@expr.to_raw_fmt tt test).to_string
-- #eval (@expr.to_raw_fmt tt test').to_string
constant α : Type
def my_little_formula : preformula L_empty 0 :=
by parse_formula (∀ x : α, x = x)
def my_larger_formula : preformula L_empty 0 :=
by parse_formula (∀ x y : α, (x = y))
-- #reduce my_little_formula -- it works!
-- ∀'(&0 ≃ &0)
-- #print my_larger_formula -- it still works!
-- ∀'∀'(&1 ≃ &0)
|
fbc1fe623ae96b82022ac0563f00b9371cfcd696 | ae1e94c332e17c7dc7051ce976d5a9eebe7ab8a5 | /src/Lean/Declaration.lean | 71d9f8c902db56c00f3234a519199f92afbff2db | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/lean4 | d082d13b01243e1de29ae680eefb476961221eef | 6a39c65bd28eb0e28c3870188f348c8914502718 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,948,755,391 | 1,610,665,114,000 | 1,610,665,114,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,516 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Expr
namespace Lean
/--
Reducibility hints are used in the convertibility checker.
When trying to solve a constraint such a
(f ...) =?= (g ...)
where f and g are definitions, the checker has to decide which one will be unfolded.
If f (g) is opaque, then g (f) is unfolded if it is also not marked as opaque,
Else if f (g) is abbrev, then f (g) is unfolded if g (f) is also not marked as abbrev,
Else if f and g are regular, then we unfold the one with the biggest definitional height.
Otherwise both are unfolded.
The arguments of the `regular` Constructor are: the definitional height and the flag `selfOpt`.
The definitional height is by default computed by the kernel. It only takes into account
other regular definitions used in a definition. When creating declarations using meta-programming,
we can specify the definitional depth manually.
Remark: the hint only affects performance. None of the hints prevent the kernel from unfolding a
declaration during Type checking.
Remark: the ReducibilityHints are not related to the attributes: reducible/irrelevance/semireducible.
These attributes are used by the Elaborator. The ReducibilityHints are used by the kernel (and Elaborator).
Moreover, the ReducibilityHints cannot be changed after a declaration is added to the kernel. -/
inductive ReducibilityHints where
| opaque : ReducibilityHints
| «abbrev» : ReducibilityHints
| regular : UInt32 → ReducibilityHints
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_reducibility_hints_regular]
def mkReducibilityHintsRegularEx (h : UInt32) : ReducibilityHints :=
ReducibilityHints.regular h
@[export lean_reducibility_hints_get_height]
def ReducibilityHints.getHeightEx (h : ReducibilityHints) : UInt32 :=
match h with
| ReducibilityHints.regular h => h
| _ => 0
namespace ReducibilityHints
def lt : ReducibilityHints → ReducibilityHints → Bool
| «abbrev», «abbrev» => false
| «abbrev», _ => true
| regular d₁, regular d₂ => d₁ < d₂
| regular _, opaque => true
| _, _ => false
end ReducibilityHints
/-- Base structure for `AxiomVal`, `DefinitionVal`, `TheoremVal`, `InductiveVal`, `ConstructorVal`, `RecursorVal` and `QuotVal`. -/
structure ConstantVal where
name : Name
lparams : List Name
type : Expr
deriving Inhabited
structure AxiomVal extends ConstantVal where
isUnsafe : Bool
@[export lean_mk_axiom_val]
def mkAxiomValEx (name : Name) (lparams : List Name) (type : Expr) (isUnsafe : Bool) : AxiomVal := {
name := name,
lparams := lparams,
type := type,
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_axiom_val_is_unsafe] def AxiomVal.isUnsafeEx (v : AxiomVal) : Bool :=
v.isUnsafe
inductive DefinitionSafety where
| «unsafe» | safe | «partial»
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
structure DefinitionVal extends ConstantVal where
value : Expr
hints : ReducibilityHints
safety : DefinitionSafety
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_definition_val]
def mkDefinitionValEx (name : Name) (lparams : List Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (hints : ReducibilityHints) (safety : DefinitionSafety) : DefinitionVal := {
name := name,
lparams := lparams,
type := type,
value := val,
hints := hints,
safety := safety
}
@[export lean_definition_val_get_safety] def DefinitionVal.getSafetyEx (v : DefinitionVal) : DefinitionSafety :=
v.safety
structure TheoremVal extends ConstantVal where
value : Expr
/- Value for an opaque constant declaration `constant x : t := e` -/
structure OpaqueVal extends ConstantVal where
value : Expr
isUnsafe : Bool
@[export lean_mk_opaque_val]
def mkOpaqueValEx (name : Name) (lparams : List Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (isUnsafe : Bool) : OpaqueVal := {
name := name,
lparams := lparams,
type := type,
value := val,
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_opaque_val_is_unsafe] def OpaqueVal.isUnsafeEx (v : OpaqueVal) : Bool :=
v.isUnsafe
structure Constructor where
name : Name
type : Expr
structure InductiveType where
name : Name
type : Expr
ctors : List Constructor
/-- Declaration object that can be sent to the kernel. -/
inductive Declaration where
| axiomDecl (val : AxiomVal)
| defnDecl (val : DefinitionVal)
| thmDecl (val : TheoremVal)
| opaqueDecl (val : OpaqueVal)
| quotDecl
| mutualDefnDecl (defns : List DefinitionVal) -- All definitions must be marked as `unsafe` or `partial`
| inductDecl (lparams : List Name) (nparams : Nat) (types : List InductiveType) (isUnsafe : Bool)
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_inductive_decl]
def mkInductiveDeclEs (lparams : List Name) (nparams : Nat) (types : List InductiveType) (isUnsafe : Bool) : Declaration :=
Declaration.inductDecl lparams nparams types isUnsafe
@[export lean_is_unsafe_inductive_decl]
def Declaration.isUnsafeInductiveDeclEx : Declaration → Bool
| Declaration.inductDecl _ _ _ isUnsafe => isUnsafe
| _ => false
@[specialize] def Declaration.foldExprM {α} {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (d : Declaration) (f : α → Expr → m α) (a : α) : m α :=
match d with
| Declaration.quotDecl => pure a
| Declaration.axiomDecl { type := type, .. } => f a type
| Declaration.defnDecl { type := type, value := value, .. } => do let a ← f a type; f a value
| Declaration.opaqueDecl { type := type, value := value, .. } => do let a ← f a type; f a value
| Declaration.thmDecl { type := type, value := value, .. } => do let a ← f a type; f a value
| Declaration.mutualDefnDecl vals => vals.foldlM (fun a v => do let a ← f a v.type; f a v.value) a
| Declaration.inductDecl _ _ inductTypes _ =>
inductTypes.foldlM
(fun a inductType => do
let a ← f a inductType.type
inductType.ctors.foldlM (fun a ctor => f a ctor.type) a)
a
@[inline] def Declaration.forExprM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (d : Declaration) (f : Expr → m Unit) : m Unit :=
d.foldExprM (fun _ a => f a) ()
/-- The kernel compiles (mutual) inductive declarations (see `inductiveDecls`) into a set of
- `Declaration.inductDecl` (for each inductive datatype in the mutual Declaration),
- `Declaration.ctorDecl` (for each Constructor in the mutual Declaration),
- `Declaration.recDecl` (automatically generated recursors).
This data is used to implement iota-reduction efficiently and compile nested inductive
declarations.
A series of checks are performed by the kernel to check whether a `inductiveDecls`
is valid or not. -/
structure InductiveVal extends ConstantVal where
nparams : Nat -- Number of parameters
nindices : Nat -- Number of indices
all : List Name -- List of all (including this one) inductive datatypes in the mutual declaration containing this one
ctors : List Name -- List of all constructors for this inductive datatype
isRec : Bool -- `true` Iff it is recursive
isUnsafe : Bool
isReflexive : Bool
isNested : Bool
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_inductive_val]
def mkInductiveValEx (name : Name) (lparams : List Name) (type : Expr) (nparams nindices : Nat)
(all ctors : List Name) (isRec isUnsafe isReflexive isNested : Bool) : InductiveVal := {
name := name
lparams := lparams
type := type
nparams := nparams
nindices := nindices
all := all
ctors := ctors
isRec := isRec
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
isReflexive := isReflexive
isNested := isNested
}
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_rec] def InductiveVal.isRecEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isRec
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_unsafe] def InductiveVal.isUnsafeEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isUnsafe
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_reflexive] def InductiveVal.isReflexiveEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isReflexive
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_nested] def InductiveVal.isNestedEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isNested
def InductiveVal.nctors (v : InductiveVal) : Nat := v.ctors.length
structure ConstructorVal extends ConstantVal where
induct : Name -- Inductive Type this Constructor is a member of
cidx : Nat -- Constructor index (i.e., Position in the inductive declaration)
nparams : Nat -- Number of parameters in inductive datatype `induct`
nfields : Nat -- Number of fields (i.e., arity - nparams)
isUnsafe : Bool
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_constructor_val]
def mkConstructorValEx (name : Name) (lparams : List Name) (type : Expr) (induct : Name) (cidx nparams nfields : Nat) (isUnsafe : Bool) : ConstructorVal := {
name := name,
lparams := lparams,
type := type,
induct := induct,
cidx := cidx,
nparams := nparams,
nfields := nfields,
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_constructor_val_is_unsafe] def ConstructorVal.isUnsafeEx (v : ConstructorVal) : Bool := v.isUnsafe
/-- Information for reducing a recursor -/
structure RecursorRule where
ctor : Name -- Reduction rule for this Constructor
nfields : Nat -- Number of fields (i.e., without counting inductive datatype parameters)
rhs : Expr -- Right hand side of the reduction rule
structure RecursorVal extends ConstantVal where
all : List Name -- List of all inductive datatypes in the mutual declaration that generated this recursor
nparams : Nat -- Number of parameters
nindices : Nat -- Number of indices
nmotives : Nat -- Number of motives
nminors : Nat -- Number of minor premises
rules : List RecursorRule -- A reduction for each Constructor
k : Bool -- It supports K-like reduction
isUnsafe : Bool
@[export lean_mk_recursor_val]
def mkRecursorValEx (name : Name) (lparams : List Name) (type : Expr) (all : List Name) (nparams nindices nmotives nminors : Nat)
(rules : List RecursorRule) (k isUnsafe : Bool) : RecursorVal := {
name := name, lparams := lparams, type := type, all := all, nparams := nparams, nindices := nindices,
nmotives := nmotives, nminors := nminors, rules := rules, k := k, isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_recursor_k] def RecursorVal.kEx (v : RecursorVal) : Bool := v.k
@[export lean_recursor_is_unsafe] def RecursorVal.isUnsafeEx (v : RecursorVal) : Bool := v.isUnsafe
def RecursorVal.getMajorIdx (v : RecursorVal) : Nat :=
v.nparams + v.nmotives + v.nminors + v.nindices
def RecursorVal.getInduct (v : RecursorVal) : Name :=
v.name.getPrefix
inductive QuotKind where
| type -- `Quot`
| ctor -- `Quot.mk`
| lift -- `Quot.lift`
| ind -- `Quot.ind`
structure QuotVal extends ConstantVal where
kind : QuotKind
@[export lean_mk_quot_val]
def mkQuotValEx (name : Name) (lparams : List Name) (type : Expr) (kind : QuotKind) : QuotVal := {
name := name, lparams := lparams, type := type, kind := kind
}
@[export lean_quot_val_kind] def QuotVal.kindEx (v : QuotVal) : QuotKind := v.kind
/-- Information associated with constant declarations. -/
inductive ConstantInfo where
| axiomInfo (val : AxiomVal)
| defnInfo (val : DefinitionVal)
| thmInfo (val : TheoremVal)
| opaqueInfo (val : OpaqueVal)
| quotInfo (val : QuotVal)
| inductInfo (val : InductiveVal)
| ctorInfo (val : ConstructorVal)
| recInfo (val : RecursorVal)
namespace ConstantInfo
def toConstantVal : ConstantInfo → ConstantVal
| defnInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| axiomInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| thmInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| opaqueInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| quotInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| inductInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| ctorInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| recInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
def isUnsafe : ConstantInfo → Bool
| defnInfo v => v.safety == DefinitionSafety.unsafe
| axiomInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| thmInfo v => false
| opaqueInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| quotInfo v => false
| inductInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| ctorInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| recInfo v => v.isUnsafe
def name (d : ConstantInfo) : Name :=
d.toConstantVal.name
def lparams (d : ConstantInfo) : List Name :=
d.toConstantVal.lparams
def type (d : ConstantInfo) : Expr :=
d.toConstantVal.type
def value? : ConstantInfo → Option Expr
| defnInfo {value := r, ..} => some r
| thmInfo {value := r, ..} => some r
| _ => none
def hasValue : ConstantInfo → Bool
| defnInfo {value := r, ..} => true
| thmInfo {value := r, ..} => true
| _ => false
def value! : ConstantInfo → Expr
| defnInfo {value := r, ..} => r
| thmInfo {value := r, ..} => r
| _ => panic! "declaration with value expected"
def hints : ConstantInfo → ReducibilityHints
| defnInfo {hints := r, ..} => r
| _ => ReducibilityHints.opaque
def isCtor : ConstantInfo → Bool
| ctorInfo _ => true
| _ => false
@[extern "lean_instantiate_type_lparams"]
constant instantiateTypeLevelParams (c : @& ConstantInfo) (ls : @& List Level) : Expr
@[extern "lean_instantiate_value_lparams"]
constant instantiateValueLevelParams (c : @& ConstantInfo) (ls : @& List Level) : Expr
end ConstantInfo
def mkRecName (declName : Name) : Name :=
Name.mkStr declName "rec"
end Lean
|
11f8b602bf54f0766ec0daa819a93f24b9a7a28c | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /tests/lean/run/1442.lean | d22c036f19240d0a75416d12ebdb52f7c0cddc8f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 573 | lean | protected def rel : ℤ × ℤ → ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| ⟨n₁, d₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂⟩ := n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁
private def mul' : ℤ × ℤ → ℤ × ℤ → ℤ × ℤ
| ⟨n₁, d₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂⟩ := ⟨n₁ * n₂, d₁ * d₂⟩
example : ∀(a b c d : ℤ × ℤ), rel a c → rel b d → rel (mul' a b) (mul' c d) :=
λ⟨n₁, d₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂⟩ ⟨n₃, d₃⟩ ⟨n₄, d₄⟩,
assume (h₁ : n₁ * d₃ = n₃ * d₁) (h₂ : n₂ * d₄ = n₄ * d₂),
show (n₁ * n₂) * (d₃ * d₄) = (n₃ * n₄) * (d₁ * d₂),
by cc
|
e3b101920c0c66b3f44ea522f8f3ecdc39795355 | 8ba901cf307a2677c194984e82644023b5d8f5d8 | /mm0-lean/x86/matching.lean | 5302a8df7ac2a995b3fc25bacf75e64c2ffff028 | [
"CC0-1.0"
] | permissive | julian-becker/mm0 | af57d3043477e1f17bdedcb29d4099bb8a25f692 | 79e2755dec1e6ee238e23e3494e84f82b6c138ac | refs/heads/master | 1,598,672,691,658 | 1,572,192,390,000 | 1,572,192,390,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,099 | lean | import x86.x86 data.set.lattice data.list.basic data.pfun data.list.alist
namespace x86
inductive flag_place | CFP | ZFP | SFP | OFP
def flag_place.read (f : flags) : flag_place → bool
| flag_place.CFP := f.CF
| flag_place.ZFP := f.ZF
| flag_place.SFP := f.SF
| flag_place.OFP := f.OF
def flag_place.write (f : flags) (b : bool) : flag_place → flags
| flag_place.CFP := {CF := b, ..f}
| flag_place.ZFP := {ZF := b, ..f}
| flag_place.SFP := {SF := b, ..f}
| flag_place.OFP := {OF := b, ..f}
inductive place
| flag : flag_place → place
| reg : regnum → place
| rip : place
| mem : qword → place
inductive place.read (k : config) : place → ∀ {n}, bitvec n → Prop
| flag {f} : place.read (place.flag f) (bitvec.singleton (f.read k.flags))
| reg {r} : place.read (place.reg r) (k.regs r)
| rip : place.read place.rip k.rip
| mem {a b} : k.mem.read1 perm.R a b → place.read (place.mem a) b
inductive place.write (k : config) : place → ∀ {n}, bitvec n → config → Prop
| flag {f b} : place.write (place.flag f) (bitvec.singleton b) {flags := f.write k.flags b, ..k}
| reg {r n q} : place.write (place.reg r) q (k.write_reg r n q)
| rip {q} : place.write place.rip q {rip := q, ..k}
| mem {a b m'} : k.mem.write1 a b m' → place.write (place.mem a) b {mem := m', ..k}
def place.stable (k k' : config) : place → Prop
| (place.flag f) := f.read k.flags = f.read k'.flags
| (place.reg r) := k.regs r = k'.regs r
| place.rip := k.rip = k'.rip
| (place.mem a) :=
roption.mk (k.mem.valid a) (λ h, (k.mem.mem a h, k.mem.perm a h)) =
roption.mk (k'.mem.valid a) (λ h, (k'.mem.mem a h, k'.mem.perm a h))
def stability (k k' : config) : set place := {p | place.stable k k' p}
def split (H h₁ h₂ : set place) : Prop :=
H = h₁ ∪ h₂ ∧ disjoint h₁ h₂
def sProp := config → Prop
def sProp.reserve (S : set place) : sProp :=
λ k, ∀ p ∈ S, ∃ n v, @place.read k p n v
def mProp := config → config → Prop
def mProp.exterior (P : mProp) : set place :=
{p | ∀ k k', P k k' → place.stable k k' p}
def stable_at (D : set place) : mProp := λ k k', D ⊆ stability k k'
def mProp.initial (Q : mProp) (P : sProp) : mProp := λ k k', Q k k' ∧ P k
def mProp.final (Q : mProp) (P : sProp) : mProp := λ k k', Q k k' ∧ P k'
def mProp.apply (Q : mProp) (P : sProp) : sProp :=
λ k', ∃ k, P k ∧ Q k k'
def mProp.id : mProp := eq
def mProp.comp (P Q : mProp) : mProp :=
λ k k₂, ∃ k₁, P k k₁ ∧ Q k₁ k₂
def slift (p : Prop) : sProp := λ _, p
def mlift (p : Prop) : mProp := λ _ _, p
def sProp.and (P Q : sProp) : sProp := λ k, P k ∧ Q k
def mProp.and (P Q : mProp) : mProp := λ k k', P k k' ∧ Q k k'
def sProp.or (P Q : sProp) : sProp := λ k, P k ∨ Q k
def mProp.or (P Q : mProp) : mProp := λ k k', P k k' ∨ Q k k'
instance lattice.has_inf.sProp : lattice.has_inf sProp := ⟨sProp.and⟩
instance lattice.has_inf.mProp : lattice.has_inf mProp := ⟨mProp.and⟩
instance lattice.has_sup.sProp : lattice.has_sup sProp := ⟨sProp.or⟩
instance lattice.has_sup.mProp : lattice.has_sup mProp := ⟨mProp.or⟩
instance lattice.has_top.sProp : lattice.has_top sProp := ⟨λ _, true⟩
instance lattice.has_top.mProp : lattice.has_top mProp := ⟨λ _ _, true⟩
instance lattice.has_bot.sProp : lattice.has_bot sProp := ⟨λ _, false⟩
instance lattice.has_bot.mProp : lattice.has_bot mProp := ⟨λ _ _, false⟩
def sProp.with (p : sProp) (q : Prop) : sProp := p ⊓ slift q
def mProp.with (p : mProp) (q : Prop) : mProp := p ⊓ mlift q
def sProp.ex {α} (p : α → sProp) : sProp := λ k, ∃ a, p a k
def mProp.ex {α} (p : α → mProp) : mProp := λ k k', ∃ a, p a k k'
def sProp.al {α} (p : α → sProp) : sProp := λ k, ∀ a, p a k
def mProp.al {α} (p : α → mProp) : mProp := λ k k', ∀ a, p a k k'
def sProp.sn (p : place) {n} (v : bitvec n) : sProp :=
λ k, p.read k v
def mProp.write (p : place) {n} (v' : bitvec n) : mProp :=
λ k k', p.write k v' k'
def mProp.sn (p : place) {n} (v v' : bitvec n) : mProp :=
(mProp.write p v').initial (sProp.sn p v)
def mProp.clob (p : place) {n} (v : bitvec n) : mProp :=
mProp.ex $ λ v', mProp.sn p v v'
def sProp.flags (f : flags) : sProp :=
sProp.al $ λ p : flag_place,
sProp.sn (place.flag p) (bitvec.singleton $ p.read f)
inductive block
| reg : regnum → wsize → block
| mem : qword → qword → block
| const : list byte → block
def block.size : block → qword
| (block.reg _ sz) := (sz.to_nat / 8 : ℕ)
| (block.mem _ sz) := sz
| (block.const l) := l.length
inductive block.places : block → set place
| reg {r sz} : block.places (block.reg r sz) (place.reg r)
| mem {a b sz : qword} :
(bitvec.sub b a).to_nat ≤ sz.to_nat →
block.places (block.mem a sz) (place.mem b)
def block.disj (b1 b2 : block) := disjoint b1.places b2.places
def sProp.mem_block (p : perm) (a : qword) (v : list byte) : sProp :=
λ k, k.mem.read' p a v
def block.read : block → list byte → sProp
| (block.reg r sz) v :=
(sProp.reserve (block.reg r sz).places).and $ λ k,
read_full_imm sz (k.regs r) v
| (block.mem a sz) v :=
(sProp.reserve (block.mem a sz).places).and $ λ k,
k.mem.read a v ∧ v.length = sz.to_nat
| (block.const l) v := slift $ v = l
def block.writable : block → sProp
| (block.reg r sz) := sProp.reserve (block.reg r sz).places
| (block.mem a sz) :=
(sProp.reserve (block.mem a sz).places).and $ λ k,
∃ v, k.mem.read' perm.W a v ∧ v.length = sz.to_nat
| (block.const _) := slift false
def block.write : block → list byte → mProp
| (block.reg r sz) l k k' := ∃ v,
@bits_to_byte (sz.to_nat * 8) sz.to_nat v l ∧
mProp.write (place.reg r) v k k'
| (block.mem a sz) l k k' :=
∃ m', k.mem.write a l m' ∧ k' = {mem := m', ..k}
| (block.const _) _ _ _ := false
theorem block.read.size : ∀ {b v k},
block.read b v k → v.length = b.size.to_nat := sorry
theorem block.write.size : ∀ {b v k k'},
block.write b v k k' → v.length = b.size.to_nat := sorry
theorem block.read_write : ∀ {b v k k'},
block.write b v k k' → block.read b v k' := sorry
theorem block.read.stable {l v k k'}
(h₁ : block.read l v k) (ss : places l ⊆ stability k k') :
block.read l v k' := sorry
def locals_ctx := alist (λ _ : ℕ, block)
def locals_ctx.get (Γ : locals_ctx) (n : ℕ) : option block := Γ.lookup n
def labels_ctx := qword × list qword
def labels_ctx.cons (q : qword) (L : labels_ctx) : labels_ctx :=
⟨L.1, q :: L.2⟩
inductive hoare_p (Q : kcfg → Prop) : kcfg → Prop
| zero {{k}} : Q k → hoare_p k
| step {{k}} : (∃ k', kcfg.step k k') →
(∀ k', k.step k' → hoare_p k') → hoare_p k
| exit (k : kcfg) (ret) :
k.k.exit ret → (ret = 0 → Q k) → hoare_p k
def hoare (P : kcfg → Prop) (Q : kcfg → kcfg → Prop) :=
∀ {{k}}, P k → hoare_p (Q k) k
def mHoareIO (P : sProp) (Q : list byte → list byte → mProp) :=
∀ {{i o}}, hoare (λ k, P k.k ∧ k.input = i ∧ k.output = o)
(λ k k', ∃ i' o', i = i' ++ k.input ∧ o = k.output ++ o' ∧
(Q i' o') k.k k'.k)
def noIO (Q : mProp) (i o : list byte) : mProp := Q.with (i = [] ∧ o = [])
def mHoare (P : sProp) (Q : mProp) := mHoareIO P (noIO Q)
inductive exit_kind
| straight
| label (n : ℕ)
def exit_kind.result (L : labels_ctx) (pos : qword) : exit_kind → mProp
| exit_kind.straight := mProp.write place.rip pos
| (exit_kind.label n) := mProp.ex $ λ h, mProp.write place.rip (L.2.nth_le n h)
def stmt : Type :=
labels_ctx → locals_ctx → set place →
∀ rip : qword, list byte → Prop
def stmt.hoareIO (P : sProp) (C : stmt)
(Q : exit_kind → list byte → list byte → mProp) : Prop :=
∀ L Γ D rip l, C L Γ D rip l →
mHoareIO (P ⊓ sProp.sn place.rip rip ⊓ sProp.mem_block (perm.R + perm.X) rip l)
(λ i o, stable_at D ⊓
(mProp.write place.rip L.1 ⊔
mProp.ex (λ e, Q e i o ⊓ e.result L (rip + l.length))))
def stmt.hoare (P : sProp) (C : stmt) (Q : exit_kind → mProp) : Prop :=
stmt.hoareIO P C (λ e, noIO (Q e))
def hstmt (P : sProp) (Q : mProp) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip v,
mHoare (sProp.sn place.rip rip ⊓ sProp.mem_block (perm.R + perm.X) rip v)
(Q ⊓ mProp.write place.rip (rip + v.length))
def stmt.all {α} (s : α → stmt) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip v, ∀ a, s a L Γ D rip v
def stmt.ex {α} (s : α → stmt) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip v, ∃ a, s a L Γ D rip v
def stmt.with (p : Prop) (s : stmt) : stmt :=
stmt.ex $ λ h : p, s
def stmt.or (s₁ s₂ : stmt) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip v, s₁ L Γ D rip v ∨ s₂ L Γ D rip v
def stmt.stabilize (S : set place) (s : stmt) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D, s L Γ (D ∪ S)
def expr (α : Type) := block → stmt
def expr.hoareIO {α} (P : sProp) (E : expr α)
(Q : block → list byte → list byte → mProp) : Prop :=
∀ b, (E b).hoareIO P $
λ e i o, exit_kind.cases_on e (Q b i o) (λ n, mlift false)
def expr.hoare {α} (P : sProp) (E : expr α) (Q : block → mProp) : Prop :=
expr.hoareIO P E (λ ret, noIO (Q ret))
def expr.stabilize {α} (S : set place) (s : expr α) : expr α := λ b, (s b).stabilize S
class value (α : Type*) :=
(size : ℕ)
(eval : α → list byte → Prop)
(eval_eq : ∀ {{a l}}, eval a l → l.length = size)
def value.evalB {α} [value α] (x : α) (b : block) : sProp :=
λ k, ∃ l, block.read b l k ∧ value.eval x l
def value.read_sized {α} [value α] (a : qword) (x : α) (b : block) : sProp :=
value.evalB x b ⊓ slift (b = block.mem a (value.size α))
class type (α : Type*) :=
(size : ℕ)
(read : α → block → set place → sProp)
(write : α → block → mProp)
(read_eq : ∀ {{a l s k}}, read a l s k → l.size.to_nat = size)
(write_eq : ∀ {{a l k k'}}, write a l k k' → l.size.to_nat = size)
(read_write : ∀ {{a l k k'}}, write a l k k' → ∃ s, read a l s k')
(read_stable : ∀ {{a l s k k'}},
read a l s k → s ⊆ stability k k' → read a l s k')
def type.read' {α} [type α] (a : α) (b : block) : sProp :=
sProp.ex $ type.read a b
instance (α) [value α] : type α :=
⟨value.size α,
λ a b s, sProp.ex $ λ v,
block.read b v ⊓ slift (value.eval a v ∧ s = b.places),
λ a b, mProp.ex $ λ v,
block.write b v ⊓ mlift (value.eval a v),
λ a b s k ⟨v, h₁, h₂, _⟩, by rw [← h₁.size, @value.eval_eq α _ a v h₂],
λ a b k k' ⟨v, h₁, h₂⟩, by rw [← h₁.size, @value.eval_eq α _ a v h₂],
λ a v k k' ⟨s, h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨_, _, block.read_write h₁, h₂, rfl⟩,
λ a l s k k' ⟨v, h₁, h₂, e⟩ ss, ⟨v, h₁.stable (e ▸ ss), h₂, e⟩⟩
theorem bits_to_byte_length {n m w v} : @bits_to_byte n m w v → v.length = m :=
by rintro ⟨bs⟩; exact bs.2
def bits.value {n} (m : ℕ) : value (bitvec n) :=
⟨m, bits_to_byte m, λ a v h, bits_to_byte_length h⟩
instance unit.value : value unit :=
⟨0, λ _ v, v = [], by rintro _ _ ⟨⟩; refl⟩
instance byte.value : value byte :=
⟨1, λ b v, v = [b], by rintro _ _ ⟨⟩; refl⟩
instance word.value : value word := bits.value 4
instance qword.value : value qword := bits.value 8
class box (α) [type α] := (deref : α)
instance box.type (α) [type α] : type (box α) :=
⟨8, λ x b s k, ∃ a l s',
block.read b l k ∧
qword.to_list_byte a l ∧
type.read x.deref (block.mem a (type.size α)) s' k ∧
s = b.places ∪ s',
λ x b k k', ∃ a l s',
block.write b l k k' ∧
qword.to_list_byte a l ∧
type.read x.deref (block.mem a (type.size α)) s' k',
λ x b s k ⟨a, l, s', h₁, h₂, _⟩,
by rw [← h₁.size, bits_to_byte_length h₂],
λ x b k k' ⟨a, l, s', h₁, h₂, _⟩,
by rw [← h₁.size, bits_to_byte_length h₂],
λ x b k k' ⟨a, l, s', h₁, h₂, h₃⟩,
⟨_, _, _, _, block.read_write h₁, h₂, h₃, rfl⟩,
λ x b s k k' ⟨a, l, s', h₁, h₂, h₃, e⟩ ss,
let ⟨ss₁, ss₂⟩ := set.union_subset_iff.1 (by rwa e at ss) in
⟨a, l, s', h₁.stable ss₁, h₂, type.read_stable h₃ ss₂, e⟩⟩
def ret (α) (b : block) : expr α :=
λ bl L Γ D a v, bl = b ∧ v = []
def const (α) (l : list byte) : expr α := ret α (block.const l)
def name (α : Type) := ℕ
def var {α} (i : name α) : expr α :=
λ bl L Γ D a v, bl ∈ Γ.get i ∧ v = []
def hexpr {α} (P : sProp) (Q : block → mProp) : expr α :=
λ ret, hstmt P (Q ret)
def expr.all {α β} (e : α → expr β) : expr β :=
λ ret, stmt.all $ λ a, e a ret
def expr.ex {α β} (e : α → expr β) : expr β :=
λ ret, stmt.ex $ λ a, e a ret
def expr.with {α} (p : Prop) (s : expr α) : expr α :=
expr.ex $ λ h : p, s
def const' {α} [type α] (a : α) : expr α :=
hexpr ⊤ $ λ b, mProp.final mProp.id (type.read' a b)
inductive stmt.seq (s₁ : stmt) (s₂ : stmt) : stmt
| mk {L Γ D rip v₁ v₂} :
s₁ L Γ D rip v₁ →
s₂ L Γ D (rip + v₁.length) v₂ →
stmt.seq L Γ D rip (v₁ ++ v₂)
inductive expr.bindS {α} (e₁ : expr α) (s₂ : block → stmt) : stmt
| mk {b L Γ D rip v₁ v₂} :
e₁ b L Γ D rip v₁ →
s₂ b L Γ D (rip + v₁.length) v₂ →
expr.bindS L Γ D rip (v₁ ++ v₂)
def expr.bind {α β} (e₁ : expr α) (e₂ : block → expr β) : expr β :=
λ b₂, expr.bindS e₁ $ λ b₁, e₂ b₁ b₂
def block.mov (dst src : block) : stmt :=
stmt.with (dst.size = src.size) $
stmt.all $ λ val, hstmt (block.read src val) (block.write dst val)
def expr.set {α} (e₁ e₂ : expr α) : stmt :=
expr.bindS e₁ $ λ dst, expr.bindS e₂ $ λ src, block.mov dst src
inductive label | fail | label (n : ℕ)
inductive label.loc (L : labels_ctx) : label → qword → Prop
| fail : label.loc label.fail L.1
| label (n h) : label.loc (label.label n) (L.2.nth_le n h)
def stmt.jump_cc (p : flags → bool) (l : label) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip v, ∀ tgt, l.loc L tgt →
mHoare (sProp.sn place.rip rip ⊓ sProp.mem_block (perm.R + perm.X) rip v)
(λ k k', stable_at D k k' ∧
mProp.write place.rip (cond (p k.flags) tgt (rip + v.length)) k k')
def stmt.jump : label → stmt := stmt.jump_cc (λ _, tt)
def boolexpr := (flags → bool) → stmt
def boolexpr.hoare (P : sProp) (E : boolexpr) (Q : bool → mProp) : Prop :=
∃ p, stmt.hoare P (E p)
(λ e k k', e = exit_kind.straight ∧ Q (p k'.flags) k k')
def boolexpr.not (c : boolexpr) : boolexpr :=
λ p, c (bnot ∘ p)
def boolexpr.jump_if (c : boolexpr) (l : label) : stmt :=
stmt.ex $ λ p, (c p).seq $ stmt.jump_cc p l
def stmt.nop : stmt := λ L Γ D rip v, v = []
def if_stmt (c : boolexpr) (s₁ s₂ : stmt) : stmt :=
stmt.ex $ λ p, stmt.seq (c p) $ λ L Γ D rip v,
∃ v₁ v₂ v₃, v = v₁ ++ v₂ ++ v₃ ∧
let q₁ := rip + v₁.length, q₂ := q₁ + v₂.length in
stmt.jump_cc (bnot ∘ p) (label.label 0) (L.cons q₁) Γ D rip v₁ ∧
s₁.seq (stmt.jump (label.label 0)) (L.cons q₂) Γ D q₁ v₂ ∧
s₂.seq (stmt.jump (label.label 0)) (L.cons q₂) Γ D q₂ v₃
def loop (s : stmt) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip, s (L.cons rip) Γ D rip
def block_stmt (s : stmt) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip v, s (L.cons (rip + v.length)) Γ D rip v
def while (c : boolexpr) (s : stmt) : stmt :=
block_stmt $ loop $
(c.not.jump_if (label.label 1)).seq $
s.seq $
stmt.jump (label.label 0)
def decl_block {α} (b : block) (s : name α → stmt) : stmt :=
λ L Γ D rip v, ∃ i, s i L (Γ.insert i b) D rip v
def decl {α} (sz : qword) (s : name α → stmt) : stmt :=
stmt.ex $ λ b, stmt.with (block.size b = sz) $ decl_block b s
def init {α} (e : expr α) (s : name α → stmt) : stmt :=
e.bindS $ λ b, decl_block b s
def binop_expr {α β γ} [type α] [type β] [type γ]
(f : α → β → γ) (e₁ : expr α) (e₂ : expr β) : expr γ :=
e₁.bind $ λ b₁, e₂.bind $ λ b₂ b, stmt.ex $ λ x, stmt.ex $ λ y,
hstmt (type.read' x b₁ ⊓ type.read' y b₂) (type.write (f x y) b)
def asn_binop {α β} [type α] [type β] (f : α → β → α) (e₁ : expr α) (e₂ : expr β) : stmt :=
e₁.bindS $ λ b₁, (ret α b₁).set (binop_expr f (ret α b₁) e₂)
def unop_expr {α β} [type α] [type β]
(f : α → β) (e : expr α) : expr β :=
e.bind $ λ b₁ b, stmt.ex $ λ x,
hstmt (type.read' x b₁) (type.write (f x) b)
def asn_unop {α} [type α] (f : α → α) (e : expr α) : stmt :=
e.bindS $ λ b, (ret α b).set (unop_expr f (ret α b))
def for {α} (start : expr α) (test : name α → boolexpr) (incr body : name α → stmt) : stmt :=
init start $ λ i, while (test i) $ (body i).seq (incr i)
def incr {α} [type α] [has_add α] [has_one α] : expr α → stmt :=
asn_unop (+ 1)
def bool_binop {α β} [type α] [type β]
(f : α → β → bool) (e₁ : expr α) (e₂ : expr β) : boolexpr :=
λ p, e₁.bindS $ λ b₁, e₂.bindS $ λ b₂, stmt.ex $ λ x, stmt.ex $ λ y,
hstmt (type.read' x b₁ ⊓ type.read' y b₂)
(mProp.final mProp.id (λ k, p k.flags = f x y))
def ltq (e₁ e₂ : expr qword) : boolexpr :=
bool_binop (λ a b : qword, a.to_nat < b.to_nat) e₁ e₂
def for_seq (sz : qword) (max : expr qword) (body : name qword → stmt) : stmt :=
for (const' (0 : qword)) (λ i, ltq (const' 0) max) (λ i, incr (var i)) body
----------------------------------------
-- Assembly
----------------------------------------
theorem hoare_p.mono {P P' : kcfg → Prop}
(H : ∀ {{k}}, P k → P' k) {k} : hoare_p P k → hoare_p P' k :=
begin
intro h, induction h,
exact hoare_p.zero (H h_a),
exact hoare_p.step h_a (λ k', h_ih _),
exact hoare_p.exit _ _ h_a (λ e, H (h_a_1 e)),
end
theorem hoare.zero {P : kcfg → Prop} {Q : kcfg → kcfg → Prop}
(H : ∀ {{k}}, P k → Q k k) : hoare P Q :=
λ k p, hoare_p.zero (H p)
theorem hoare.step {P P' : kcfg → Prop} {Q Q' : kcfg → kcfg → Prop}
(h₁ : ∀ {{k}}, P k → ∃ k', k.step k')
(h₂ : ∀ {{k}}, P k → ∀ {{k'}}, k.step k' → P' k' ∧ ∀ {{k''}}, Q' k' k'' → Q k k'')
(h₃ : hoare P' Q') : hoare P Q :=
λ k p, hoare_p.step (h₁ p) (λ k' s, hoare_p.mono (h₂ p s).2 (h₃ (h₂ p s).1))
theorem hoare.mono_l {P P' : kcfg → Prop} {Q : kcfg → kcfg → Prop}
(H : ∀ {{k}}, P k → P' k) : hoare P' Q → hoare P Q :=
λ H' k h, H' (H h)
theorem hoare.mono_r {P : kcfg → Prop} {Q Q' : kcfg → kcfg → Prop}
(H : ∀ {{k k'}}, Q k k' → Q' k k') : hoare P Q → hoare P Q' :=
λ H' k h, hoare_p.mono (@H _) (H' h)
theorem mHoareIO.zero {P : sProp} {Q : list byte → list byte → mProp}
(H : ∀ {{k}}, P k → Q [] [] k k) : mHoareIO P Q :=
λ i o, hoare.zero $ by rintro k ⟨h, rfl, rfl⟩; exact
⟨[], [], rfl, (list.append_nil _).symm, H h⟩
theorem mHoareIO.mono_l {P P' : sProp} {Q : list byte → list byte → mProp}
(H : ∀ {{k}}, P k → P' k) : mHoareIO P' Q → mHoareIO P Q :=
λ h i o, hoare.mono_l (by exact λ k ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨H h₁, h₂⟩) (@h i o)
theorem mHoareIO.mono_r {P : sProp} {Q Q' : list byte → list byte → mProp}
(H : ∀ {{i o k k'}}, Q i o k k' → Q' i o k k') : mHoareIO P Q → mHoareIO P Q' :=
λ h i o, hoare.mono_r (by exact λ k k' ⟨i', o', h₁, h₂, h₃⟩,
⟨i', o', h₁, h₂, H h₃⟩) (@h i o)
theorem mHoareIO.step {P P' : sProp} {Q Q' : list byte → list byte → mProp}
(H₁ : ∀ ⦃k i o⦄, P k → ∃ k', kcfg.step ⟨i, o, k⟩ k')
(H₂ : ∀ {{k₁ i₁ o₁ k₂ i₂ o₂}}, P k₁ →
kcfg.step ⟨i₁, o₁, k₁⟩ ⟨i₂, o₂, k₂⟩ → P' k₂ ∧ i₂ = i₁ ∧ o₂ = o₁ ∧
∀ {{k₃}}, Q' [] [] k₂ k₃ → Q [] [] k₁ k₃)
(H₃ : mHoareIO P' Q') : mHoareIO P Q :=
λ i o, begin
refine hoare.step (λ ⟨i', o', k⟩ h, H₁ h.1) _ (@H₃ i o),
rintro ⟨i₁, o₁, k₁⟩ ⟨h, rfl, rfl⟩ ⟨i₂, o₂, k₂⟩ h',
rcases @H₂ k₁ i₁ o₁ k₂ i₂ o₂ h h' with ⟨h₁, rfl, rfl, h₄⟩,
refine ⟨⟨h₁, rfl, rfl⟩, _⟩,
rintro k₃ ⟨i', o', e₁, e₂, h₅⟩,
refine ⟨i', o', e₁, e₂, _⟩,
cases ((list.append_right_inj _).1 e₁ : [] = i'),
cases ((list.append_left_inj _).1 ((list.append_nil _).trans e₂) : [] = o'),
exact h₄ h₅
end
theorem mHoareIO.asm (P : sProp) (Q : list byte → list byte → mProp) :
mHoareIO P Q :=
λ i o, sorry
theorem sHoare.mono {P Q : sProp} (H : ∀ {{k}}, P k → Q k) : sHoare P Q :=
sHoareIO.mono $ λ k S h, ⟨H h, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem sHoare.mono_l {P P' Q : sProp}
(H : ∀ {{k S}}, P k S → P' k S) : sHoare P' Q → sHoare P Q :=
sHoareIO.mono_l H
theorem sHoare.mono_r {P Q Q' : sProp}
(H : ∀ {{k S}}, Q k S → Q' k S) : sHoare P Q → sHoare P Q' :=
sHoareIO.mono_r $ λ i o k S ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨H h₁, h₂⟩
theorem config.isIO_terminal {k} :
(∃ k', config.step k k') → ¬ ∃ k', k.isIO k' := sorry
theorem sHoare.step {P P' Q : sProp}
(h₁ : ∀ ⦃k S⦄, P k S → ∃ k', config.step k k')
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃k S⦄, P k S → ∀ k', config.step k k' → P' k' S) :
sHoare P' Q → sHoare P Q :=
sHoareIO.step
(λ k i o S h, let ⟨k', h'⟩ := h₁ h in ⟨_, kcfg.step.noio h'⟩)
(λ k₁ i₁ o₁ k₂ i₂ o₂ S h h', begin
cases h', exact ⟨h₂ h _ h'_a, rfl, rfl⟩,
cases config.isIO_terminal (h₁ h) ⟨_, h'_a⟩
end)
def stmt.asm {n} (s : stmt n) := Π L Γ rip, ∃ v, s L Γ rip v
theorem hstmt.step {n} {P P' Q : sProp}
(h₁ : ∀ (L : labels_ctx) (Γ : locals_ctx n) rip,
∃ l, ∀ v k S,
(P * sProp.sn place.rip rip *
sProp.mem_block (perm.R + perm.X) rip (l ++ v)) k S →
∃ a k', decode a l ∧
(write_rip (k.rip + bitvec.of_nat 64 l.length) k).P () k' ∧
(execute a k').P () k ∧
∀ H, P k H → P' k' H)
(h₂ : (@hstmt n P' Q).asm)
: (@hstmt n P Q).asm :=
λ L Γ rip, let ⟨l, H⟩ := h₁ L Γ rip, ⟨v, H₂⟩ := h₂ L Γ rip in
⟨l ++ v, begin
refine sHoare.step (λ k S h, _) (λ k S h k', _) (sHoare.mono_r _ H₂),
{ rcases H v k S h with ⟨a, k', h₃, h₄, h₅, h₆⟩,
have : mem.readX (k.mem) (k.rip) l, sorry,
exact ⟨k, this, h₃, (), k', h₄, h₅⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨l, a, _, m, d, h⟩,
sorry },
sorry,
end⟩
theorem hstmt.asm {n} (P : sProp) (Q : sProp) : (@hstmt n P Q).asm :=
sorry
end x86 |
7c1586cbca5e3f09671783e5fec3a68f499bee39 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /test/linear_combination.lean | c1f0921b46dee78a20488a75e3caed5e2c5219f4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,416 | lean | import tactic.linear_combination
import data.real.basic
/-! ### Simple Cases with ℤ and two or less equations -/
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10):
3*x + 2*y = 10 :=
by linear_combination 1*h1
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10):
3*x + 2*y = 10 :=
by linear_combination (h1)
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x + 2 = -3) (h2 : y = 10) :
2*x + 4 = -6 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x*y + 2*x = 1) (h2 : x = y) :
x*y = -2*y + 1 :=
by linear_combination 1*h1 - 2*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x*y + 2*x = 1) (h2 : x = y) :
x*y = -2*y + 1 :=
by linear_combination -2*h2 + h1
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x + 2 = -3) (h2 : y = 10) :
2*x + 4 - y = -16 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 + -1*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x + 2 = -3) (h2 : y = 10) :
-y + 2*x + 4 = -16 :=
by linear_combination -h2 + 2*h1
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10) (h2 : 2*x + 5*y = 3) :
11*y = -11 :=
by linear_combination -2*h1 + 3*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10) (h2 : 2*x + 5*y = 3) :
-11*y = 11 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 - 3*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10) (h2 : 2*x + 5*y = 3) :
-11*y = 11 + 1 - 1 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 + -3*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : 10 = 3*x + 2*y) (h2 : 3 = 2*x + 5*y) :
11 + 1 - 1 = -11*y :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 - 3*h2
/-! ### More complicated cases with two equations -/
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x + 2 = -3) (h2 : y = 10) :
-y + 2*x + 4 = -16 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 - h2
example (x y : ℚ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10) (h2 : 2*x + 5*y = 3) :
-11*y + 1 = 11 + 1 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 - 3*h2
example (a b : ℝ) (ha : 2*a = 4) (hab : 2*b = a - b) :
b = 2 / 3 :=
by linear_combination ha/6 + hab/3
/-! ### Cases with more than 2 equations -/
example (a b : ℝ) (ha : 2*a = 4) (hab : 2*b = a - b) (hignore : 3 = a + b) :
b = 2 / 3 :=
by linear_combination 1/6 * ha + 1/3 * hab + 0 * hignore
example (x y z : ℝ) (ha : x + 2*y - z = 4) (hb : 2*x + y + z = -2)
(hc : x + 2*y + z = 2) :
-3*x - 3*y - 4*z = 2 :=
by linear_combination ha - hb - 2*hc
example (x y z : ℝ) (ha : x + 2*y - z = 4) (hb : 2*x + y + z = -2)
(hc : x + 2*y + z = 2) :
6*x = -10 :=
by linear_combination 1*ha + 4*hb - 3*hc
example (x y z : ℝ) (ha : x + 2*y - z = 4) (hb : 2*x + y + z = -2)
(hc : x + 2*y + z = 2) :
10 = 6*-x :=
by linear_combination ha + 4*hb - 3*hc
example (w x y z : ℝ) (h1 : x + 2.1*y + 2*z = 2) (h2 : x + 8*z + 5*w = -6.5)
(h3 : x + y + 5*z + 5*w = 3) :
x + 2.2*y + 2*z - 5*w = -8.5 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 + 1*h2 - 2*h3
example (w x y z : ℝ) (h1 : x + 2.1*y + 2*z = 2) (h2 : x + 8*z + 5*w = -6.5)
(h3 : x + y + 5*z + 5*w = 3) :
x + 2.2*y + 2*z - 5*w = -8.5 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 + h2 - 2*h3
example (a b c d : ℚ) (h1 : a = 4) (h2 : 3 = b) (h3 : c*3 = d) (h4 : -d = a) :
2*a - 3 + 9*c + 3*d = 8 - b + 3*d - 3*a :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 -1*h2 +3*h3 -3*h4
example (a b c d : ℚ) (h1 : a = 4) (h2 : 3 = b) (h3 : c*3 = d) (h4 : -d = a) :
6 - 3*c + 3*a + 3*d = 2*b - d + 12 - 3*a :=
by linear_combination 2*h2 -h3 +3*h1 -3*h4
/-! ### Cases with non-hypothesis inputs -/
constants (qc : ℚ) (hqc : qc = 2*qc)
example (a b : ℚ) (h : ∀ p q : ℚ, p = q) : 3*a + qc = 3*b + 2*qc :=
by linear_combination 3 * h a b + hqc
constant bad (q : ℚ) : q = 0
example (a b : ℚ) : a + b^3 = 0 :=
by linear_combination bad a + b * bad (b*b)
/-! ### Cases with arbitrary coefficients -/
example (a b : ℤ) (h : a = b) :
a * a = a * b :=
by linear_combination a*h
example (a b c : ℤ) (h : a = b) :
a * c = b * c :=
by linear_combination c*h
example (a b c : ℤ) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : b = 1) :
c * a + b = c * b + 1 :=
by linear_combination c*h1 + h2
example (x y : ℚ) (h1 : x + y = 3) (h2 : 3*x = 7) :
x*x*y + y*x*y + 6*x = 3*x*y + 14 :=
by linear_combination x*y*h1 + 2*h2
example {α} [h : comm_ring α] {a b c d e f : α} (h1 : a*d = b*c) (h2 : c*f = e*d) :
c * (a*f - b*e) = 0 :=
by linear_combination e*h1 + a*h2
example (x y z w : ℚ) (hzw : z = w) : x*z + 2*y*z = x*w + 2*y*w :=
by linear_combination (x + 2*y)*hzw
/-! ### Cases that explicitly use a linear_combination_config -/
example (x y : ℚ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10) (h2 : 2*x + 5*y = 3) :
-11*y + 1 = 11 + 1 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 -3*h2 with {normalization_tactic := `[ring]}
example (x y : ℚ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10) (h2 : 2*x + 5*y = 3) :
-11*y + 1 = 11 + 1 :=
by linear_combination 2*h1 + -3*h2 with {normalization_tactic := `[ring1]}
example (a b : ℝ) (ha : 2*a = 4) (hab : 2*b = a - b) :
b = 2 / 3 :=
by linear_combination 1/6*ha + 1/3*hab with {normalization_tactic := `[ring_nf]}
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : 3*x + 2*y = 10):
3*x + 2*y = 10 :=
by linear_combination h1 with {normalization_tactic := `[simp]}
/-! ### Cases that have linear_combination skip normalization -/
example (a b : ℝ) (ha : 2*a = 4) (hab : 2*b = a - b) :
b = 2 / 3 :=
begin
linear_combination 1/6*ha + 1/3*hab with {normalize := ff},
linarith
end
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x = -3) (h2 : y = 10) :
2*x = -6 :=
begin
linear_combination 2*h1 with {normalize := ff},
simp,
norm_cast
end
/-! ### Cases without any arguments provided -/
-- the corner case is "just apply the normalization procedure".
-- an empty `linear_combination` at the end of a declaration is a bad edge case for the parser.
example {x y z w : ℤ} (h₁ : 3 * x = 4 + y) (h₂ : x + 2 * y = 1) : z + w = w + z :=
by linear_combination
.
-- this interacts as expected with options
example {x y z w : ℤ} (h₁ : 3 * x = 4 + y) (h₂ : x + 2 * y = 1) : z + w = w + z :=
begin
linear_combination with {normalize := ff},
guard_target' z + w - (w + z) - (0 - 0) = 0,
simp [add_comm]
end
example {x y z w : ℤ} (h₁ : 3 * x = 4 + y) (h₂ : x + 2 * y = 1) : z + w = w + z :=
by linear_combination with {normalization_tactic := `[simp [add_comm]]}
/-! ### Cases with exponent -/
example (x y z : ℚ) (h : x = y) (h2 : x * y = 0) : x + y*z = 0 :=
by linear_combination (-y * z ^ 2 + x) * h + (z ^ 2 + 2 * z + 1) * h2 with {exponent := 2}
example (x y z : ℚ) (h : x = y) (h2 : x * y = 0) : y*z = -x :=
begin
linear_combination (-y * z ^ 2 + x) * h + (z ^ 2 + 2 * z + 1) * h2
with {exponent := 2, normalize := ff},
ring
end
example (K : Type)
[field K]
[char_zero K]
{x y z : K}
(h₂ : y ^ 3 + x * (3 * z ^ 2) = 0)
(h₁ : x ^ 3 + z * (3 * y ^ 2) = 0)
(h₀ : y * (3 * x ^ 2) + z ^ 3 = 0)
(h : x ^ 3 * y + y ^ 3 * z + z ^ 3 * x = 0) :
x = 0 :=
by linear_combination 2 * y * z ^ 2 * h₂ / 7 + (x ^ 3 - y ^ 2 * z / 7) * h₁ -
x * y * z * h₀ + y * z * h / 7 with {exponent := 6}
/-! ### Cases where the goal is not closed -/
example (x y : ℚ) (h1 : x + y = 3) (h2 : 3*x = 7) :
x*x*y + y*x*y + 6*x = 3*x*y + 14 :=
begin
linear_combination x*y*h1 + h2,
guard_target' (x * 3 - 7 = 0),
linear_combination h2
end
example (a b c d : ℚ) (h1 : a = 4) (h2 : 3 = b) (h3 : c*3 = d) (h4 : -d = a) :
6 - 3*c + 3*a + 3*d = 2*b - d + 12 - 3*a :=
begin
linear_combination 2*h2,
linear_combination -h3,
linear_combination 3*h1,
linear_combination -3*h4,
end
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x*y + 2*x = 1) (h2 : x = y) :
x*y = -2*y + 1 :=
begin
linear_combination,
linear_combination h1 - 2 * h2,
end
/-! ### Cases that should fail -/
-- This should fail because the second coefficient has a different type than
-- the equations it is being combined with. This was a design choice for the
-- sake of simplicity, but the tactic could potentially be modified to allow
-- this behavior.
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x*y + 2*x = 1) (h2 : x = y) :
x*y + 2*x = 1 :=
begin
success_if_fail_with_msg {linear_combination h1 + (0 : ℝ) * h2}
"invalid type ascription, term has type
ℝ
but is expected to have type
ℤ",
linear_combination h1
end
-- This fails because the linear_combination tactic requires the equations
-- and coefficients to use a type that fulfills the add_group condition,
-- and ℕ does not.
example (a b : ℕ) (h1 : a = 3) :
a = 3 :=
begin
success_if_fail {linear_combination h1},
exact h1
end
example (a b : ℤ) (x y : ℝ) (hab : a = b) (hxy : x = y) : 2*x = 2*y :=
begin
success_if_fail_with_msg {linear_combination 2*hab}
"hab is an equality between terms of type ℤ, but is expected to be between terms of type ℝ",
linear_combination 2*hxy
end
|
3ad1ccee72f68e590d6abaf5754dfce03dcef132 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /tests/playground/webserver/Webserver.lean | 71e716b6b56583297366ef6e45c82a9054e9d273 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,057 | lean | -- -*- origami-fold-style: triple-braces -*-
import Lean
-- namespace Webserver {{{
namespace Webserver
structure State :=
(verb : String)
(path : String)
(status := "200 OK")
(outHeaders : Array String := #[])
(out : String := "")
(tryNextHandler := false)
abbrev HandlerM := StateT State IO
abbrev Handler := HandlerM Unit
def checkVerb (verb : String) : Handler := do
st ← get;
when (st.verb != verb) $
throw $ IO.userError "invalid verb"
def checkPathLiteral (p : String) : Handler := do
st ← get;
if p.isPrefixOf st.path then
set { st with path := st.path.extract p.bsize st.path.bsize }
else
throw $ IO.userError "invalid path"
def getPathPart : HandlerM String := do
st ← get;
let stop := st.path.posOf '/';
set { st with path := st.path.extract stop st.path.bsize };
pure $ st.path.extract 0 stop
def checkPathConsumed : Handler := do
st ← get;
when (st.path != "") $
throw $ IO.userError "invalid path"
def write (out : String) : Handler := do
modify fun st => { st with out := st.out ++ out }
def redirect (url : String) : Handler := do
modify fun st => { st with status := "307 Temporary Redirect", outHeaders := #["Location: " ++ url] }
def notFound : Handler := do
modify fun st => { st with status := "404 Not Found" };
write "whoops"
def mkHandlersRef : IO (IO.Ref (List Handler)) :=
IO.mkRef ∅
@[init mkHandlersRef]
constant handlersRef : IO.Ref (List Handler) := arbitrary _
def registerHandler (h : Handler) : IO Unit := do
handlersRef.modify fun hs => h::hs
partial def parseHeaders : IO.FS.Handle → IO Unit
| hIn => do
line ← hIn.getLine;
if line == "" || line == "\r\n" then pure () else parseHeaders hIn
partial def run : IO.FS.Handle → IO.FS.Handle → IO Unit
| hIn, hOut => do
line ← hIn.getLine;
when (line != "") do
[verb, path, proto] ← pure $ line.splitOn " "
| panic! "failed to parse request: " ++ line;
stderr ← IO.stderr; stderr.putStrLn $ "=> " ++ verb ++ " " ++ path;
headers ← parseHeaders hIn;
handlers ← handlersRef.get | panic! "no handlers";
(_, st) ← handlers.foldr (fun h₁ h₂ => h₁ <|> h₂) notFound { verb := verb, path := path };
stderr ← IO.stderr; stderr.putStrLn $ "<= " ++ st.status;
hOut.putStrLn $ "HTTP/1.1 " ++ st.status;
hOut.putStrLn "Content-Type: text/html";
hOut.putStrLn $ "Content-Length: " ++ toString st.out.bsize;
st.outHeaders.forM hOut.putStrLn;
hOut.putStrLn "";
hOut.putStr st.out;
hOut.flush;
run hIn hOut
end Webserver
--}}}
open Lean
open Lean.Parser
-- declare_syntax_cat element {{{
declare_syntax_cat element
declare_syntax_cat child
syntax "<" ident "/>" : element
syntax "<" ident ">" child* "</" ident ">" : element
-- "JSXTextCharacter : SourceCharacter but not one of {, <, > or }"
def text : Parser := -- {{{
withAntiquot (mkAntiquot "text" `LX.text) {
fn := fun c s =>
let startPos := s.pos;
let s := takeWhile1Fn (not ∘ "{<>}$".contains) "HTML text" c s;
mkNodeToken `LX.text startPos c s } -- }}}
syntax text : child
syntax "{" term "}" : child
syntax element : child
syntax element : term
macro_rules
| `(<$n/>) => mkStxStrLit ("<" ++ toString n.getId ++ ">")
| `(<$n>$cs*</$m>) => -- {{{
if n.getId == m.getId then do
cs ← cs.mapM fun c => match_syntax c with
| `(child|$t:text) => pure $ mkStxStrLit (t.getArg 0).getAtomVal!
| `(child|{$t}) => pure t
| `(child|$e:element) => `($e:element)
| _ => unreachable!;
let cs := cs.push (mkStxStrLit ("</" ++ toString m.getId ++ ">"));
cs.foldlM (fun s e => `($s ++ $e)) (mkStxStrLit ("<" ++ toString n.getId ++ ">"))
else Macro.throwError m ("expected </" ++ toString n.getId ++ ">")
-- }}}
-- }}}
-- open Webserver {{{
open Webserver
def pathLiteral : Parser := -- {{{
withAntiquot (mkAntiquot "pathLiteral" `pathLiteral) {
fn := fun c s =>
let startPos := s.pos;
let s := takeWhile1Fn (fun c => c == '/' || c.isAlphanum) "URL path" c s;
mkNodeToken `pathLiteral startPos c s } -- }}}
declare_syntax_cat pathItem
syntax pathLiteral : pathItem
syntax "{" ident "}" : pathItem
syntax path := pathItem*
declare_syntax_cat verb
syntax "GET" : verb
syntax "POST" : verb
macro v:verb p:path " => " t:term : command => do -- {{{
t ← `(do checkPathConsumed; $t:term);
t ← p.getArgs.foldrM (fun pi t => match_syntax pi with
| `(pathItem|$l:pathLiteral) => `(do checkPathLiteral $(mkStxStrLit (l.getArg 0).getAtomVal!); $t:term)
| `(pathItem|{$id}) => `(do $id:ident ← getPathPart; $t:term)
| _ => unreachable!) t;
`(def handler : Handler := do
checkVerb $(mkStxStrLit (v.getArg 0).getAtomVal!);
$t:term
@[init] def reg : IO Unit := registerHandler handler)
-- }}}
GET / => redirect "/greet/stranger"
GET /greet/{name} => write
<html>
<h1>Hello, {name}!</h1>
</html>
def main : IO Unit := do
hIn ← IO.stdin;
hOut ← IO.stdout;
Webserver.run hIn hOut
-- }}}
#check let name := "PLDI"; <h1>Hello, {name}!<br/></h1>
|
c0f3e4c34b53221cf51fc8d63702cdd00edb9e0d | efa51dd2edbbbbd6c34bd0ce436415eb405832e7 | /20161026_ICTAC_Tutorial/ex21.lean | 6107d13b86b0f9bf302876ad2a9f70781daffeba | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover/presentations | dd031a05bcb12c8855676c77e52ed84246bd889a | 3ce2d132d299409f1de269fa8e95afa1333d644e | refs/heads/master | 1,688,703,388,796 | 1,686,838,383,000 | 1,687,465,742,000 | 29,750,158 | 12 | 9 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,211,670,000 | 1,422,042,683,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 416 | lean | /- Namespaces -/
namespace foo
def a : ℕ := 5
def f (x : ℕ) : ℕ := x + 7
def fa : ℕ := f a
def ffa : ℕ := f (f a)
print "inside foo"
check a
check f
check fa
check ffa
check foo.fa
end foo
print "outside the namespace"
-- check a -- error
-- check f -- error
check foo.a
check foo.f
check foo.fa
check foo.ffa
open foo
print "opened foo"
check a
check f
check fa
check foo.fa
|
ac36b0f50822879a93bb9d6e56ed213d1c8c5d96 | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/logic/unnamed_632.lean | d1ac7ce1edeab6216fa7f7a663b2aebc634ba16e | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 106 | lean | import data.real.basic
-- BEGIN
example : ∃ x : ℝ, 2 < x ∧ x < 3 :=
⟨5 / 2, by norm_num⟩
-- END |
facd5768210a84a48a42c763b135ed53d6e2539c | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /src/analysis/complex/polynomial.lean | 5d13cfcf7a5c2d36eb19088af335b03b88199976 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,027 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.polynomial topology.instances.polynomial analysis.complex.exponential
open complex polynomial metric filter is_absolute_value set lattice
namespace complex
lemma exists_forall_abs_polynomial_eval_le (p : polynomial ℂ) :
∃ x, ∀ y, (p.eval x).abs ≤ (p.eval y).abs :=
if hp0 : 0 < degree p
then let ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩ := polynomial.tendsto_infinity complex.abs hp0 ((p.eval 0).abs) in
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := exists_forall_le_of_compact_of_continuous (λ y, (p.eval y).abs)
(p.continuous_eval.comp continuous_abs)
(closed_ball 0 r) (proper_space.compact_ball _ _)
(set.ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.2 ⟨0, by simp [le_of_lt hr0]⟩) in
⟨x, λ y, if hy : y.abs ≤ r then hx₂ y $ by simpa [complex.dist_eq] using hy
else le_trans (hx₂ _ (by simp [le_of_lt hr0])) (le_of_lt (hr y (lt_of_not_ge hy)))⟩
else ⟨p.coeff 0, by rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (le_of_not_gt hp0)]; simp⟩
/- The following proof uses the method given at
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fundamental+theorem+of+algebra#classical_fta_via_advanced_calculus -/
/-- The fundamental theorem of algebra. Every non constant complex polynomial
has a root -/
lemma exists_root {f : polynomial ℂ} (hf : 0 < degree f) : ∃ z : ℂ, is_root f z :=
let ⟨z₀, hz₀⟩ := exists_forall_abs_polynomial_eval_le f in
exists.intro z₀ $ by_contradiction $ λ hf0,
have hfX : f - C (f.eval z₀) ≠ 0,
from mt sub_eq_zero.1 (λ h, not_le_of_gt hf (h.symm ▸ degree_C_le)),
let n := root_multiplicity z₀ (f - C (f.eval z₀)) in
let g := (f - C (f.eval z₀)) /ₘ ((X - C z₀) ^ n) in
have hg0 : g.eval z₀ ≠ 0, from eval_div_by_monic_pow_root_multiplicity_ne_zero _ hfX,
have hg : g * (X - C z₀) ^ n = f - C (f.eval z₀),
from div_by_monic_mul_pow_root_multiplicity_eq _ _,
have hn0 : 0 < n, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero $ λ hn0, by simpa [g, hn0] using hg0,
let ⟨δ', hδ'₁, hδ'₂⟩ := continuous_iff.1 (polynomial.continuous_eval g) z₀
((g.eval z₀).abs) (complex.abs_pos.2 hg0) in
let δ := min (min (δ' / 2) 1) (((f.eval z₀).abs / (g.eval z₀).abs) / 2) in
have hf0' : 0 < (f.eval z₀).abs, from complex.abs_pos.2 hf0,
have hfg0 : 0 < abs (eval z₀ f) * (abs (eval z₀ g))⁻¹, from div_pos hf0' (complex.abs_pos.2 hg0),
have hδ0 : 0 < δ, from lt_min (lt_min (half_pos hδ'₁) (by norm_num)) (half_pos hfg0),
have hδ : ∀ z : ℂ, abs (z - z₀) = δ → abs (g.eval z - g.eval z₀) < (g.eval z₀).abs,
from λ z hz, hδ'₂ z (by rw [complex.dist_eq, hz];
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _))
(half_lt_self hδ'₁)),
have hδ1 : δ ≤ 1, from le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _),
let F : polynomial ℂ := C (f.eval z₀) + C (g.eval z₀) * (X - C z₀) ^ n in
let z' := (-f.eval z₀ * (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n /
((f.eval z₀).abs * g.eval z₀)) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ) + z₀ in
have hF₁ : F.eval z' = f.eval z₀ - f.eval z₀ * (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n / (f.eval z₀).abs,
by simp only [F, cpow_nat_inv_pow _ hn0, div_eq_mul_inv, eval_pow, mul_assoc, mul_comm (g.eval z₀),
mul_left_comm (g.eval z₀), mul_left_comm (g.eval z₀)⁻¹, mul_inv', inv_mul_cancel hg0,
eval_C, eval_add, eval_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, eval_mul, eval_X, add_neg_cancel_right,
neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, mul_one, div_eq_mul_inv];
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc],
have hδs : (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n / (f.eval z₀).abs < 1,
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, mul_comm, ← @inv_inv' _ _ (complex.abs _ * _), mul_inv',
inv_inv', ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_lt_iff hfg0, one_mul];
calc δ ^ n ≤ δ ^ 1 : pow_le_pow_of_le_one (le_of_lt hδ0) hδ1 hn0
... = δ : pow_one _
... ≤ ((f.eval z₀).abs / (g.eval z₀).abs) / 2 : min_le_right _ _
... < _ : half_lt_self hfg0,
have hF₂ : (F.eval z').abs = (f.eval z₀).abs - (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n,
from calc (F.eval z').abs = (f.eval z₀ - f.eval z₀ * (g.eval z₀).abs
* δ ^ n / (f.eval z₀).abs).abs : congr_arg abs hF₁
... = abs (f.eval z₀) * complex.abs (1 - (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n /
(f.eval z₀).abs : ℝ) : by rw [← complex.abs_mul];
exact congr_arg complex.abs
(by simp [mul_add, add_mul, mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv])
... = _ : by rw [complex.abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt hδs)),
mul_sub, mul_div_cancel' _ (ne.symm (ne_of_lt hf0')), mul_one],
have hef0 : abs (eval z₀ g) * (eval z₀ f).abs ≠ 0,
from mul_ne_zero (mt complex.abs_eq_zero.1 hg0) (mt complex.abs_eq_zero.1 hf0),
have hz'z₀ : abs (z' - z₀) = δ,
by simp [z', mul_assoc, mul_left_comm _ (_ ^ n), mul_comm _ (_ ^ n),
mul_comm (eval z₀ f).abs, _root_.mul_div_cancel _ hef0, of_real_mul,
neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, neg_div, is_absolute_value.abv_pow complex.abs,
complex.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hδ0), real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv (le_of_lt hδ0) hn0],
have hF₃ : (f.eval z' - F.eval z').abs < (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n,
from calc (f.eval z' - F.eval z').abs
= (g.eval z' - g.eval z₀).abs * (z' - z₀).abs ^ n :
by rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq.1 hg, ← is_absolute_value.abv_pow complex.abs,
← complex.abs_mul, sub_mul];
simp [F, eval_pow, eval_add, eval_mul, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, add_sub_cancel]
... = (g.eval z' - g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n : by rw hz'z₀
... < _ : (mul_lt_mul_right (pow_pos hδ0 _)).2 (hδ _ hz'z₀),
lt_irrefl (f.eval z₀).abs $
calc (f.eval z₀).abs ≤ (f.eval z').abs : hz₀ _
... = (F.eval z' + (f.eval z' - F.eval z')).abs : by simp
... ≤ (F.eval z').abs + (f.eval z' - F.eval z').abs : complex.abs_add _ _
... < (f.eval z₀).abs - (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n + (g.eval z₀).abs * δ ^ n :
add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (by rw hF₂) hF₃
... = (f.eval z₀).abs : sub_add_cancel _ _
end complex
|
876ade83c2f809d3ac7797f5af75c6242c9adf6f | 2c096fdfecf64e46ea7bc6ce5521f142b5926864 | /src/Init/Meta.lean | 533fc8f80902f950c62d4ebdd3958c1f821ac4e3 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | Kha/lean4 | 1005785d2c8797ae266a303968848e5f6ce2fe87 | b99e11346948023cd6c29d248cd8f3e3fb3474cf | refs/heads/master | 1,693,355,498,027 | 1,669,080,461,000 | 1,669,113,138,000 | 184,748,176 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,995,520,000 | 1,556,884,930,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 46,885 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura and Sebastian Ullrich
Additional goodies for writing macros
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Basic
import Init.Data.Option.BasicAux
namespace Lean
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_MAJOR)"]
private opaque version.getMajor (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.major : Nat := version.getMajor ()
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR)"]
private opaque version.getMinor (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.minor : Nat := version.getMinor ()
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_PATCH)"]
private opaque version.getPatch (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.patch : Nat := version.getPatch ()
@[extern "lean_get_githash"]
opaque getGithash (u : Unit) : String
def githash : String := getGithash ()
@[extern c inline "LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE"]
opaque version.getIsRelease (u : Unit) : Bool
def version.isRelease : Bool := version.getIsRelease ()
/-- Additional version description like "nightly-2018-03-11" -/
@[extern c inline "lean_mk_string(LEAN_SPECIAL_VERSION_DESC)"]
opaque version.getSpecialDesc (u : Unit) : String
def version.specialDesc : String := version.getSpecialDesc ()
def versionStringCore :=
toString version.major ++ "." ++ toString version.minor ++ "." ++ toString version.patch
def versionString :=
if version.specialDesc ≠ "" then
versionStringCore ++ "-" ++ version.specialDesc
else if version.isRelease then
versionStringCore
else
versionStringCore ++ ", commit " ++ githash
def origin :=
"leanprover/lean4"
def toolchain :=
if version.specialDesc ≠ "" then
if version.isRelease then
origin ++ ":" ++ versionStringCore ++ "-" ++ version.specialDesc
else
origin ++ ":" ++ version.specialDesc
else if version.isRelease then
origin ++ ":" ++ versionStringCore
else
""
@[extern c inline "LEAN_IS_STAGE0"]
opaque Internal.isStage0 (u : Unit) : Bool
/-- Valid identifier names -/
def isGreek (c : Char) : Bool :=
0x391 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3dd
def isLetterLike (c : Char) : Bool :=
(0x3b1 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3c9 && c.val ≠ 0x3bb) || -- Lower greek, but lambda
(0x391 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3A9 && c.val ≠ 0x3A0 && c.val ≠ 0x3A3) || -- Upper greek, but Pi and Sigma
(0x3ca ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3fb) || -- Coptic letters
(0x1f00 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1ffe) || -- Polytonic Greek Extended Character Set
(0x2100 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x214f) || -- Letter like block
(0x1d49c ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1d59f) -- Latin letters, Script, Double-struck, Fractur
def isNumericSubscript (c : Char) : Bool :=
0x2080 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x2089
def isSubScriptAlnum (c : Char) : Bool :=
isNumericSubscript c ||
(0x2090 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x209c) ||
(0x1d62 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1d6a)
def isIdFirst (c : Char) : Bool :=
c.isAlpha || c = '_' || isLetterLike c
def isIdRest (c : Char) : Bool :=
c.isAlphanum || c = '_' || c = '\'' || c == '!' || c == '?' || isLetterLike c || isSubScriptAlnum c
def idBeginEscape := '«'
def idEndEscape := '»'
def isIdBeginEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idBeginEscape
def isIdEndEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idEndEscape
namespace Name
def getRoot : Name → Name
| anonymous => anonymous
| n@(str anonymous _) => n
| n@(num anonymous _) => n
| str n _ => getRoot n
| num n _ => getRoot n
@[export lean_is_inaccessible_user_name]
def isInaccessibleUserName : Name → Bool
| Name.str _ s => s.contains '✝' || s == "_inaccessible"
| Name.num p _ => isInaccessibleUserName p
| _ => false
def escapePart (s : String) : Option String :=
if s.length > 0 && isIdFirst (s.get 0) && (s.toSubstring.drop 1).all isIdRest then s
else if s.any isIdEndEscape then none
else some <| idBeginEscape.toString ++ s ++ idEndEscape.toString
-- NOTE: does not roundtrip even with `escape = true` if name is anonymous or contains numeric part or `idEndEscape`
variable (sep : String) (escape : Bool)
def toStringWithSep : Name → String
| anonymous => "[anonymous]"
| str anonymous s => maybeEscape s
| num anonymous v => toString v
| str n s => toStringWithSep n ++ sep ++ maybeEscape s
| num n v => toStringWithSep n ++ sep ++ Nat.repr v
where
maybeEscape s := if escape then escapePart s |>.getD s else s
protected def toString (n : Name) (escape := true) : String :=
-- never escape "prettified" inaccessible names or macro scopes or pseudo-syntax introduced by the delaborator
toStringWithSep "." (escape && !n.isInaccessibleUserName && !n.hasMacroScopes && !maybePseudoSyntax) n
where
maybePseudoSyntax :=
if let .str _ s := n.getRoot then
-- could be pseudo-syntax for loose bvar or universe mvar, output as is
"#".isPrefixOf s || "?".isPrefixOf s
else
false
instance : ToString Name where
toString n := n.toString
private def hasNum : Name → Bool
| anonymous => false
| num .. => true
| str p .. => hasNum p
protected def reprPrec (n : Name) (prec : Nat) : Std.Format :=
match n with
| anonymous => Std.Format.text "Lean.Name.anonymous"
| num p i => Repr.addAppParen ("Lean.Name.mkNum " ++ Name.reprPrec p max_prec ++ " " ++ repr i) prec
| str p s =>
if p.hasNum then
Repr.addAppParen ("Lean.Name.mkStr " ++ Name.reprPrec p max_prec ++ " " ++ repr s) prec
else
Std.Format.text "`" ++ n.toString
instance : Repr Name where
reprPrec := Name.reprPrec
def capitalize : Name → Name
| .str p s => .str p s.capitalize
| n => n
def replacePrefix : Name → Name → Name → Name
| anonymous, anonymous, newP => newP
| anonymous, _, _ => anonymous
| n@(str p s), queryP, newP => if n == queryP then newP else Name.mkStr (p.replacePrefix queryP newP) s
| n@(num p s), queryP, newP => if n == queryP then newP else Name.mkNum (p.replacePrefix queryP newP) s
/--
`eraseSuffix? n s` return `n'` if `n` is of the form `n == n' ++ s`.
-/
def eraseSuffix? : Name → Name → Option Name
| n, anonymous => some n
| str p s, str p' s' => if s == s' then eraseSuffix? p p' else none
| num p s, num p' s' => if s == s' then eraseSuffix? p p' else none
| _, _ => none
/-- Remove macros scopes, apply `f`, and put them back -/
@[inline] def modifyBase (n : Name) (f : Name → Name) : Name :=
if n.hasMacroScopes then
let view := extractMacroScopes n
{ view with name := f view.name }.review
else
f n
@[export lean_name_append_after]
def appendAfter (n : Name) (suffix : String) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| str p s => Name.mkStr p (s ++ suffix)
| n => Name.mkStr n suffix
@[export lean_name_append_index_after]
def appendIndexAfter (n : Name) (idx : Nat) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| str p s => Name.mkStr p (s ++ "_" ++ toString idx)
| n => Name.mkStr n ("_" ++ toString idx)
@[export lean_name_append_before]
def appendBefore (n : Name) (pre : String) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| anonymous => Name.mkStr anonymous pre
| str p s => Name.mkStr p (pre ++ s)
| num p n => Name.mkNum (Name.mkStr p pre) n
protected theorem beq_iff_eq {m n : Name} : m == n ↔ m = n := by
show m.beq n ↔ _
induction m generalizing n <;> cases n <;> simp_all [Name.beq, And.comm]
instance : LawfulBEq Name where
eq_of_beq := Name.beq_iff_eq.1
rfl := Name.beq_iff_eq.2 rfl
instance : DecidableEq Name :=
fun a b => if h : a == b then .isTrue (by simp_all) else .isFalse (by simp_all)
end Name
structure NameGenerator where
namePrefix : Name := `_uniq
idx : Nat := 1
deriving Inhabited
namespace NameGenerator
@[inline] def curr (g : NameGenerator) : Name :=
Name.mkNum g.namePrefix g.idx
@[inline] def next (g : NameGenerator) : NameGenerator :=
{ g with idx := g.idx + 1 }
@[inline] def mkChild (g : NameGenerator) : NameGenerator × NameGenerator :=
({ namePrefix := Name.mkNum g.namePrefix g.idx, idx := 1 },
{ g with idx := g.idx + 1 })
end NameGenerator
class MonadNameGenerator (m : Type → Type) where
getNGen : m NameGenerator
setNGen : NameGenerator → m Unit
export MonadNameGenerator (getNGen setNGen)
def mkFreshId {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadNameGenerator m] : m Name := do
let ngen ← getNGen
let r := ngen.curr
setNGen ngen.next
pure r
instance monadNameGeneratorLift (m n : Type → Type) [MonadLift m n] [MonadNameGenerator m] : MonadNameGenerator n := {
getNGen := liftM (getNGen : m _),
setNGen := fun ngen => liftM (setNGen ngen : m _)
}
namespace Syntax
deriving instance Repr for Syntax.Preresolved
deriving instance Repr for Syntax
deriving instance Repr for TSyntax
abbrev Term := TSyntax `term
abbrev Command := TSyntax `command
protected abbrev Level := TSyntax `level
protected abbrev Tactic := TSyntax `tactic
abbrev Prec := TSyntax `prec
abbrev Prio := TSyntax `prio
abbrev Ident := TSyntax identKind
abbrev StrLit := TSyntax strLitKind
abbrev CharLit := TSyntax charLitKind
abbrev NameLit := TSyntax nameLitKind
abbrev ScientificLit := TSyntax scientificLitKind
abbrev NumLit := TSyntax numLitKind
end Syntax
export Syntax (Term Command Prec Prio Ident StrLit CharLit NameLit ScientificLit NumLit)
namespace TSyntax
instance : Coe (TSyntax [k]) (TSyntax (k :: ks)) where
coe stx := ⟨stx⟩
instance : Coe (TSyntax ks) (TSyntax (k' :: ks)) where
coe stx := ⟨stx⟩
instance : Coe Ident Term where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : CoeDep Term ⟨Syntax.ident info ss n res⟩ Ident where
coe := ⟨Syntax.ident info ss n res⟩
instance : Coe StrLit Term where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : Coe NameLit Term where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : Coe ScientificLit Term where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : Coe NumLit Term where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : Coe CharLit Term where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : Coe Ident Syntax.Level where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : Coe NumLit Prio where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
instance : Coe NumLit Prec where
coe s := ⟨s.raw⟩
namespace Compat
scoped instance : CoeTail Syntax (TSyntax k) where
coe s := ⟨s⟩
scoped instance : CoeTail (Array Syntax) (TSyntaxArray k) where
coe := .mk
end Compat
end TSyntax
namespace Syntax
deriving instance BEq for Syntax.Preresolved
/-- Compare syntax structures modulo source info. -/
partial def structEq : Syntax → Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.missing, Syntax.missing => true
| Syntax.node _ k args, Syntax.node _ k' args' => k == k' && args.isEqv args' structEq
| Syntax.atom _ val, Syntax.atom _ val' => val == val'
| Syntax.ident _ rawVal val preresolved, Syntax.ident _ rawVal' val' preresolved' => rawVal == rawVal' && val == val' && preresolved == preresolved'
| _, _ => false
instance : BEq Lean.Syntax := ⟨structEq⟩
instance : BEq (Lean.TSyntax k) := ⟨(·.raw == ·.raw)⟩
partial def getTailInfo? : Syntax → Option SourceInfo
| atom info _ => info
| ident info .. => info
| node SourceInfo.none _ args =>
args.findSomeRev? getTailInfo?
| node info _ _ => info
| _ => none
def getTailInfo (stx : Syntax) : SourceInfo :=
stx.getTailInfo?.getD SourceInfo.none
def getTrailingSize (stx : Syntax) : Nat :=
match stx.getTailInfo? with
| some (SourceInfo.original (trailing := trailing) ..) => trailing.bsize
| _ => 0
/--
Return substring of original input covering `stx`.
Result is meaningful only if all involved `SourceInfo.original`s refer to the same string (as is the case after parsing). -/
def getSubstring? (stx : Syntax) (withLeading := true) (withTrailing := true) : Option Substring :=
match stx.getHeadInfo, stx.getTailInfo with
| SourceInfo.original lead startPos _ _, SourceInfo.original _ _ trail stopPos =>
some {
str := lead.str
startPos := if withLeading then lead.startPos else startPos
stopPos := if withTrailing then trail.stopPos else stopPos
}
| _, _ => none
@[specialize] private partial def updateLast {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) (i : Nat) : Option (Array α) :=
if i == 0 then
none
else
let i := i - 1
let v := a[i]!
match f v with
| some v => some <| a.set! i v
| none => updateLast a f i
partial def setTailInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some <| atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some <| ident info rawVal val pre
| node info k args =>
match updateLast args (setTailInfoAux info) args.size with
| some args => some <| node info k args
| none => none
| _ => none
def setTailInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setTailInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def unsetTrailing (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx.getTailInfo with
| SourceInfo.original lead pos _ endPos => stx.setTailInfo (SourceInfo.original lead pos "".toSubstring endPos)
| _ => stx
@[specialize] private partial def updateFirst {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) (i : Nat) : Option (Array α) :=
if h : i < a.size then
let v := a[i]
match f v with
| some v => some <| a.set ⟨i, h⟩ v
| none => updateFirst a f (i+1)
else
none
partial def setHeadInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some <| atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some <| ident info rawVal val pre
| node i k args =>
match updateFirst args (setHeadInfoAux info) 0 with
| some args => some <| node i k args
| _ => none
| _ => none
def setHeadInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setHeadInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def setInfo (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Syntax
| atom _ val => atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => ident info rawVal val pre
| node _ kind args => node info kind args
| missing => missing
/-- Return the first atom/identifier that has position information -/
partial def getHead? : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(atom info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| stx@(ident info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| node SourceInfo.none _ args => args.findSome? getHead?
| stx@(node ..) => stx
| _ => none
def copyHeadTailInfoFrom (target source : Syntax) : Syntax :=
target.setHeadInfo source.getHeadInfo |>.setTailInfo source.getTailInfo
/-- Ensure head position is synthetic. The server regards syntax as "original" only if both head and tail info are `original`. -/
def mkSynthetic (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
stx.setHeadInfo (SourceInfo.fromRef stx)
end Syntax
/-- Use the head atom/identifier of the current `ref` as the `ref` -/
@[inline] def withHeadRefOnly {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadRef m] {α} (x : m α) : m α := do
match (← getRef).getHead? with
| none => x
| some ref => withRef ref x
@[inline] def mkNode (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (args : Array Syntax) : TSyntax k :=
⟨Syntax.node SourceInfo.none k args⟩
/-- Syntax objects for a Lean module. -/
structure Module where
header : Syntax
commands : Array Syntax
/--
Expand macros in the given syntax.
A node with kind `k` is visited only if `p k` is true.
Note that the default value for `p` returns false for `by ...` nodes.
This is a "hack". The tactic framework abuses the macro system to implement extensible tactics.
For example, one can define
```lean
syntax "my_trivial" : tactic -- extensible tactic
macro_rules | `(tactic| my_trivial) => `(tactic| decide)
macro_rules | `(tactic| my_trivial) => `(tactic| assumption)
```
When the tactic evaluator finds the tactic `my_trivial`, it tries to evaluate the `macro_rule` expansions
until one "works", i.e., the macro expansion is evaluated without producing an exception.
We say this solution is a bit hackish because the term elaborator may invoke `expandMacros` with `(p := fun _ => true)`,
and expand the tactic macros as just macros. In the example above, `my_trivial` would be replaced with `assumption`,
`decide` would not be tried if `assumption` fails at tactic evaluation time.
We are considering two possible solutions for this issue:
1- A proper extensible tactic feature that does not rely on the macro system.
2- Typed macros that know the syntax categories they're working in. Then, we would be able to select which
syntatic categories are expanded by `expandMacros`.
-/
partial def expandMacros (stx : Syntax) (p : SyntaxNodeKind → Bool := fun k => k != `Lean.Parser.Term.byTactic) : MacroM Syntax :=
withRef stx do
match stx with
| .node info k args => do
if p k then
match (← expandMacro? stx) with
| some stxNew => expandMacros stxNew
| none => do
let args ← Macro.withIncRecDepth stx <| args.mapM expandMacros
return .node info k args
else
return stx
| stx => return stx
/-! # Helper functions for processing Syntax programmatically -/
/--
Create an identifier copying the position from `src`.
To refer to a specific constant, use `mkCIdentFrom` instead. -/
def mkIdentFrom (src : Syntax) (val : Name) (canonical := false) : Ident :=
⟨Syntax.ident (SourceInfo.fromRef src canonical) (toString val).toSubstring val []⟩
def mkIdentFromRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] (val : Name) (canonical := false) : m Ident := do
return mkIdentFrom (← getRef) val canonical
/--
Create an identifier referring to a constant `c` copying the position from `src`.
This variant of `mkIdentFrom` makes sure that the identifier cannot accidentally
be captured. -/
def mkCIdentFrom (src : Syntax) (c : Name) (canonical := false) : Ident :=
-- Remark: We use the reserved macro scope to make sure there are no accidental collision with our frontend
let id := addMacroScope `_internal c reservedMacroScope
⟨Syntax.ident (SourceInfo.fromRef src canonical) (toString id).toSubstring id [.decl c []]⟩
def mkCIdentFromRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] (c : Name) (canonical := false) : m Syntax := do
return mkCIdentFrom (← getRef) c canonical
def mkCIdent (c : Name) : Ident :=
mkCIdentFrom Syntax.missing c
@[export lean_mk_syntax_ident]
def mkIdent (val : Name) : Ident :=
⟨Syntax.ident SourceInfo.none (toString val).toSubstring val []⟩
@[inline] def mkNullNode (args : Array Syntax := #[]) : Syntax :=
mkNode nullKind args
@[inline] def mkGroupNode (args : Array Syntax := #[]) : Syntax :=
mkNode groupKind args
def mkSepArray (as : Array Syntax) (sep : Syntax) : Array Syntax := Id.run do
let mut i := 0
let mut r := #[]
for a in as do
if i > 0 then
r := r.push sep |>.push a
else
r := r.push a
i := i + 1
return r
def mkOptionalNode (arg : Option Syntax) : Syntax :=
match arg with
| some arg => mkNullNode #[arg]
| none => mkNullNode #[]
def mkHole (ref : Syntax) (canonical := false) : Syntax :=
mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.hole #[mkAtomFrom ref "_" canonical]
namespace Syntax
def mkSep (a : Array Syntax) (sep : Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkNullNode <| mkSepArray a sep
def SepArray.ofElems {sep} (elems : Array Syntax) : SepArray sep :=
⟨mkSepArray elems (if sep.isEmpty then mkNullNode else mkAtom sep)⟩
def SepArray.ofElemsUsingRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] {sep} (elems : Array Syntax) : m (SepArray sep) := do
let ref ← getRef;
return ⟨mkSepArray elems (if sep.isEmpty then mkNullNode else mkAtomFrom ref sep)⟩
instance : Coe (Array Syntax) (SepArray sep) where
coe := SepArray.ofElems
instance : Coe (TSyntaxArray k) (TSepArray k sep) where
coe a := ⟨mkSepArray a.raw (mkAtom sep)⟩
/-- Create syntax representing a Lean term application, but avoid degenerate empty applications. -/
def mkApp (fn : Term) : (args : TSyntaxArray `term) → Term
| #[] => fn
| args => ⟨mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.app #[fn, mkNullNode args.raw]⟩
def mkCApp (fn : Name) (args : TSyntaxArray `term) : Term :=
mkApp (mkCIdent fn) args
def mkLit (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : TSyntax kind :=
let atom : Syntax := Syntax.atom info val
mkNode kind #[atom]
def mkStrLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : StrLit :=
mkLit strLitKind (String.quote val) info
def mkNumLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : NumLit :=
mkLit numLitKind val info
def mkScientificLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : TSyntax scientificLitKind :=
mkLit scientificLitKind val info
def mkNameLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : NameLit :=
mkLit nameLitKind val info
/-! Recall that we don't have special Syntax constructors for storing numeric and string atoms.
The idea is to have an extensible approach where embedded DSLs may have new kind of atoms and/or
different ways of representing them. So, our atoms contain just the parsed string.
The main Lean parser uses the kind `numLitKind` for storing natural numbers that can be encoded
in binary, octal, decimal and hexadecimal format. `isNatLit` implements a "decoder"
for Syntax objects representing these numerals. -/
private partial def decodeBinLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if c == '0' then decodeBinLitAux s (s.next i) (2*val)
else if c == '1' then decodeBinLitAux s (s.next i) (2*val + 1)
else none
private partial def decodeOctalLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '7' then decodeOctalLitAux s (s.next i) (8*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else none
private def decodeHexDigit (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Nat × String.Pos) :=
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then some (c.toNat - '0'.toNat, i)
else if 'a' ≤ c && c ≤ 'f' then some (10 + c.toNat - 'a'.toNat, i)
else if 'A' ≤ c && c ≤ 'F' then some (10 + c.toNat - 'A'.toNat, i)
else none
private partial def decodeHexLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else match decodeHexDigit s i with
| some (d, i) => decodeHexLitAux s i (16*val + d)
| none => none
private partial def decodeDecimalLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then decodeDecimalLitAux s (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else none
def decodeNatLitVal? (s : String) : Option Nat :=
let len := s.length
if len == 0 then none
else
let c := s.get 0
if c == '0' then
if len == 1 then some 0
else
let c := s.get ⟨1⟩
if c == 'x' || c == 'X' then decodeHexLitAux s ⟨2⟩ 0
else if c == 'b' || c == 'B' then decodeBinLitAux s ⟨2⟩ 0
else if c == 'o' || c == 'O' then decodeOctalLitAux s ⟨2⟩ 0
else if c.isDigit then decodeDecimalLitAux s 0 0
else none
else if c.isDigit then decodeDecimalLitAux s 0 0
else none
def isLit? (litKind : SyntaxNodeKind) (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node _ k args =>
if k == litKind && args.size == 1 then
match args.get! 0 with
| (Syntax.atom _ val) => some val
| _ => none
else
none
| _ => none
private def isNatLitAux (litKind : SyntaxNodeKind) (stx : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
match isLit? litKind stx with
| some val => decodeNatLitVal? val
| _ => none
def isNatLit? (s : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
isNatLitAux numLitKind s
def isFieldIdx? (s : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
isNatLitAux fieldIdxKind s
/-- Decodes a 'scientific number' string which is consumed by the `OfScientific` class.
Takes as input a string such as `123`, `123.456e7` and returns a triple `(n, sign, e)` with value given by
`n * 10^-e` if `sign` else `n * 10^e`.
-/
partial def decodeScientificLitVal? (s : String) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
let len := s.length
if len == 0 then none
else
let c := s.get 0
if c.isDigit then
decode 0 0
else none
where
decodeAfterExp (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) (sign : Bool) (exp : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
if sign then
some (val, sign, exp + e)
else if exp >= e then
some (val, sign, exp - e)
else
some (val, true, e - exp)
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decodeAfterExp (s.next i) val e sign (10*exp + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else
none
decodeExp (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then none else
let c := s.get i
if c == '-' then
decodeAfterExp (s.next i) val e true 0
else if c == '+' then
decodeAfterExp (s.next i) val e false 0
else
decodeAfterExp i val e false 0
decodeAfterDot (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
some (val, true, e)
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decodeAfterDot (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat) (e+1)
else if c == 'e' || c == 'E' then
decodeExp (s.next i) val e
else
none
decode (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
none
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decode (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else if c == '.' then
decodeAfterDot (s.next i) val 0
else if c == 'e' || c == 'E' then
decodeExp (s.next i) val 0
else
none
def isScientificLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
match isLit? scientificLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeScientificLitVal? val
| _ => none
def isIdOrAtom? : Syntax → Option String
| Syntax.atom _ val => some val
| Syntax.ident _ rawVal _ _ => some rawVal.toString
| _ => none
def toNat (stx : Syntax) : Nat :=
match stx.isNatLit? with
| some val => val
| none => 0
def decodeQuotedChar (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Char × String.Pos) := do
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\\' then pure ('\\', i)
else if c = '\"' then pure ('\"', i)
else if c = '\'' then pure ('\'', i)
else if c = 'r' then pure ('\r', i)
else if c = 'n' then pure ('\n', i)
else if c = 't' then pure ('\t', i)
else if c = 'x' then
let (d₁, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₂, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
pure (Char.ofNat (16*d₁ + d₂), i)
else if c = 'u' then do
let (d₁, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₂, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₃, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₄, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
pure (Char.ofNat (16*(16*(16*d₁ + d₂) + d₃) + d₄), i)
else
none
partial def decodeStrLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (acc : String) : Option String := do
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\"' then
pure acc
else if s.atEnd i then
none
else if c == '\\' then do
let (c, i) ← decodeQuotedChar s i
decodeStrLitAux s i (acc.push c)
else
decodeStrLitAux s i (acc.push c)
def decodeStrLit (s : String) : Option String :=
decodeStrLitAux s ⟨1⟩ ""
def isStrLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match isLit? strLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeStrLit val
| _ => none
def decodeCharLit (s : String) : Option Char := do
let c := s.get ⟨1⟩
if c == '\\' then do
let (c, _) ← decodeQuotedChar s ⟨2⟩
pure c
else
pure c
def isCharLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option Char :=
match isLit? charLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeCharLit val
| _ => none
private partial def splitNameLitAux (ss : Substring) (acc : List Substring) : List Substring :=
let splitRest (ss : Substring) (acc : List Substring) : List Substring :=
if ss.front == '.' then
splitNameLitAux (ss.drop 1) acc
else if ss.isEmpty then
acc
else
[]
if ss.isEmpty then []
else
let curr := ss.front
if isIdBeginEscape curr then
let escapedPart := ss.takeWhile (!isIdEndEscape ·)
let escapedPart := { escapedPart with stopPos := ss.stopPos.min (escapedPart.str.next escapedPart.stopPos) }
if !isIdEndEscape (escapedPart.get <| escapedPart.prev ⟨escapedPart.bsize⟩) then []
else splitRest (ss.extract ⟨escapedPart.bsize⟩ ⟨ss.bsize⟩) (escapedPart :: acc)
else if isIdFirst curr then
let idPart := ss.takeWhile isIdRest
splitRest (ss.extract ⟨idPart.bsize⟩ ⟨ss.bsize⟩) (idPart :: acc)
else if curr.isDigit then
let idPart := ss.takeWhile Char.isDigit
splitRest (ss.extract ⟨idPart.bsize⟩ ⟨ss.bsize⟩) (idPart :: acc)
else
[]
/-- Split a name literal (without the backtick) into its dot-separated components. For example,
`foo.bla.«bo.o»` ↦ `["foo", "bla", "«bo.o»"]`. If the literal cannot be parsed, return `[]`. -/
def splitNameLit (ss : Substring) : List Substring :=
splitNameLitAux ss [] |>.reverse
def decodeNameLit (s : String) : Option Name :=
if s.get 0 == '`' then
match splitNameLitAux (s.toSubstring.drop 1) [] with
| [] => none
| comps => some <| comps.foldr (init := Name.anonymous)
fun comp n =>
let comp := comp.toString
if isIdBeginEscape comp.front then
Name.mkStr n (comp.drop 1 |>.dropRight 1)
else if comp.front.isDigit then
if let some k := decodeNatLitVal? comp then
Name.mkNum n k
else
unreachable!
else
Name.mkStr n comp
else
none
def isNameLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option Name :=
match isLit? nameLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeNameLit val
| _ => none
def hasArgs : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node _ _ args => args.size > 0
| _ => false
def isAtom : Syntax → Bool
| atom _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isToken (token : String) : Syntax → Bool
| atom _ val => val.trim == token.trim
| _ => false
def isNone (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node _ k args => k == nullKind && args.size == 0
-- when elaborating partial syntax trees, it's reasonable to interpret missing parts as `none`
| Syntax.missing => true
| _ => false
def getOptionalIdent? (stx : Syntax) : Option Name :=
match stx.getOptional? with
| some stx => some stx.getId
| none => none
partial def findAux (p : Syntax → Bool) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node _ _ args) => if p stx then some stx else args.findSome? (findAux p)
| stx => if p stx then some stx else none
def find? (stx : Syntax) (p : Syntax → Bool) : Option Syntax :=
findAux p stx
end Syntax
namespace TSyntax
def getNat (s : NumLit) : Nat :=
s.raw.isNatLit?.getD 0
def getId (s : Ident) : Name :=
s.raw.getId
def getScientific (s : ScientificLit) : Nat × Bool × Nat :=
s.raw.isScientificLit?.getD (0, false, 0)
def getString (s : StrLit) : String :=
s.raw.isStrLit?.getD ""
def getChar (s : CharLit) : Char :=
s.raw.isCharLit?.getD default
def getName (s : NameLit) : Name :=
s.raw.isNameLit?.getD .anonymous
namespace Compat
scoped instance : CoeTail (Array Syntax) (Syntax.TSepArray k sep) where
coe a := (a : TSyntaxArray k)
end Compat
end TSyntax
/-- Reflect a runtime datum back to surface syntax (best-effort). -/
class Quote (α : Type) (k : SyntaxNodeKind := `term) where
quote : α → TSyntax k
export Quote (quote)
instance [Quote α k] [CoeHTCT (TSyntax k) (TSyntax [k'])] : Quote α k' := ⟨fun a => quote (k := k) a⟩
instance : Quote Term := ⟨id⟩
instance : Quote Bool := ⟨fun | true => mkCIdent ``Bool.true | false => mkCIdent ``Bool.false⟩
instance : Quote String strLitKind := ⟨Syntax.mkStrLit⟩
instance : Quote Nat numLitKind := ⟨fun n => Syntax.mkNumLit <| toString n⟩
instance : Quote Substring := ⟨fun s => Syntax.mkCApp ``String.toSubstring' #[quote s.toString]⟩
-- in contrast to `Name.toString`, we can, and want to be, precise here
private def getEscapedNameParts? (acc : List String) : Name → Option (List String)
| Name.anonymous => if acc.isEmpty then none else some acc
| Name.str n s => do
let s ← Name.escapePart s
getEscapedNameParts? (s::acc) n
| Name.num _ _ => none
def quoteNameMk : Name → Term
| .anonymous => mkCIdent ``Name.anonymous
| .str n s => Syntax.mkCApp ``Name.mkStr #[quoteNameMk n, quote s]
| .num n i => Syntax.mkCApp ``Name.mkNum #[quoteNameMk n, quote i]
instance : Quote Name `term where
quote n := match getEscapedNameParts? [] n with
| some ss => ⟨mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ ".".intercalate ss)]⟩
| none => ⟨quoteNameMk n⟩
instance [Quote α `term] [Quote β `term] : Quote (α × β) `term where
quote
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Syntax.mkCApp ``Prod.mk #[quote a, quote b]
private def quoteList [Quote α `term] : List α → Term
| [] => mkCIdent ``List.nil
| (x::xs) => Syntax.mkCApp ``List.cons #[quote x, quoteList xs]
instance [Quote α `term] : Quote (List α) `term where
quote := quoteList
private def quoteArray [Quote α `term] (xs : Array α) : Term :=
if xs.size <= 8 then
go 0 #[]
else
Syntax.mkCApp ``List.toArray #[quote xs.toList]
where
go (i : Nat) (args : Array Term) : Term :=
if h : i < xs.size then
go (i+1) (args.push (quote xs[i]))
else
Syntax.mkCApp (Name.mkStr2 "Array" ("mkArray" ++ toString xs.size)) args
termination_by go i _ => xs.size - i
instance [Quote α `term] : Quote (Array α) `term where
quote := quoteArray
instance Option.hasQuote {α : Type} [Quote α `term] : Quote (Option α) `term where
quote
| none => mkIdent ``none
| (some x) => Syntax.mkCApp ``some #[quote x]
/-- Evaluator for `prec` DSL -/
def evalPrec (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Nat :=
Macro.withIncRecDepth stx do
let stx ← expandMacros stx
match stx with
| `(prec| $num:num) => return num.getNat
| _ => Macro.throwErrorAt stx "unexpected precedence"
macro_rules
| `(prec| $a + $b) => do `(prec| $(quote <| (← evalPrec a) + (← evalPrec b)):num)
macro_rules
| `(prec| $a - $b) => do `(prec| $(quote <| (← evalPrec a) - (← evalPrec b)):num)
macro "eval_prec " p:prec:max : term => return quote (k := `term) (← evalPrec p)
/-- Evaluator for `prio` DSL -/
def evalPrio (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Nat :=
Macro.withIncRecDepth stx do
let stx ← expandMacros stx
match stx with
| `(prio| $num:num) => return num.getNat
| _ => Macro.throwErrorAt stx "unexpected priority"
macro_rules
| `(prio| $a + $b) => do `(prio| $(quote <| (← evalPrio a) + (← evalPrio b)):num)
macro_rules
| `(prio| $a - $b) => do `(prio| $(quote <| (← evalPrio a) - (← evalPrio b)):num)
macro "eval_prio " p:prio:max : term => return quote (k := `term) (← evalPrio p)
def evalOptPrio : Option (TSyntax `prio) → MacroM Nat
| some prio => evalPrio prio
| none => return 1000 -- TODO: FIX back eval_prio default
end Lean
namespace Array
abbrev getSepElems := @getEvenElems
open Lean
private partial def filterSepElemsMAux {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → m Bool) (i : Nat) (acc : Array Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) := do
if h : i < a.size then
let stx := a[i]
if (← p stx) then
if acc.isEmpty then
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) (acc.push stx)
else if hz : i ≠ 0 then
have : i.pred < i := Nat.pred_lt hz
have : i.pred < a.size := Nat.lt_trans this h
let sepStx := a[i.pred]
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) ((acc.push sepStx).push stx)
else
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) (acc.push stx)
else
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) acc
else
pure acc
def filterSepElemsM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → m Bool) : m (Array Syntax) :=
filterSepElemsMAux a p 0 #[]
def filterSepElems (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → Bool) : Array Syntax :=
Id.run <| a.filterSepElemsM p
private partial def mapSepElemsMAux {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → m Syntax) (i : Nat) (acc : Array Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) := do
if h : i < a.size then
let stx := a[i]
if i % 2 == 0 then do
let stx ← f stx
mapSepElemsMAux a f (i+1) (acc.push stx)
else
mapSepElemsMAux a f (i+1) (acc.push stx)
else
pure acc
def mapSepElemsM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → m Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) :=
mapSepElemsMAux a f 0 #[]
def mapSepElems (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
Id.run <| a.mapSepElemsM f
end Array
namespace Lean.Syntax
def SepArray.getElems (sa : SepArray sep) : Array Syntax :=
sa.elemsAndSeps.getSepElems
def TSepArray.getElems (sa : TSepArray k sep) : TSyntaxArray k :=
.mk sa.elemsAndSeps.getSepElems
def TSepArray.push (sa : TSepArray k sep) (e : TSyntax k) : TSepArray k sep :=
if sa.elemsAndSeps.isEmpty then
{ elemsAndSeps := #[e] }
else
{ elemsAndSeps := sa.elemsAndSeps.push (mkAtom sep) |>.push e }
instance : EmptyCollection (SepArray sep) where
emptyCollection := ⟨∅⟩
instance : EmptyCollection (TSepArray sep k) where
emptyCollection := ⟨∅⟩
/-
We use `CoeTail` here instead of `Coe` to avoid a "loop" when computing `CoeTC`.
The "loop" is interrupted using the maximum instance size threshold, but it is a performance bottleneck.
The loop occurs because the predicate `isNewAnswer` is too imprecise.
-/
instance : CoeTail (SepArray sep) (Array Syntax) where
coe := SepArray.getElems
instance : Coe (TSepArray k sep) (TSyntaxArray k) where
coe := TSepArray.getElems
instance [Coe (TSyntax k) (TSyntax k')] : Coe (TSyntaxArray k) (TSyntaxArray k') where
coe a := a.map Coe.coe
instance : Coe (TSyntaxArray k) (Array Syntax) where
coe a := a.raw
instance : Coe Ident (TSyntax `Lean.Parser.Command.declId) where
coe id := mkNode _ #[id, mkNullNode #[]]
instance : Coe (Lean.Term) (Lean.TSyntax `Lean.Parser.Term.funBinder) where
coe stx := ⟨stx⟩
end Lean.Syntax
set_option linter.unusedVariables.funArgs false in
/--
Gadget for automatic parameter support. This is similar to the `optParam` gadget, but it uses
the given tactic.
Like `optParam`, this gadget only affects elaboration.
For example, the tactic will *not* be invoked during type class resolution. -/
abbrev autoParam.{u} (α : Sort u) (tactic : Lean.Syntax) : Sort u := α
/-! # Helper functions for manipulating interpolated strings -/
namespace Lean.Syntax
private def decodeInterpStrQuotedChar (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Char × String.Pos) := do
match decodeQuotedChar s i with
| some r => some r
| none =>
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '{' then pure ('{', i)
else none
private partial def decodeInterpStrLit (s : String) : Option String :=
let rec loop (i : String.Pos) (acc : String) : Option String :=
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\"' || c == '{' then
pure acc
else if s.atEnd i then
none
else if c == '\\' then do
let (c, i) ← decodeInterpStrQuotedChar s i
loop i (acc.push c)
else
loop i (acc.push c)
loop ⟨1⟩ ""
partial def isInterpolatedStrLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match isLit? interpolatedStrLitKind stx with
| none => none
| some val => decodeInterpStrLit val
def getSepArgs (stx : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
stx.getArgs.getSepElems
end Syntax
namespace TSyntax
def expandInterpolatedStrChunks (chunks : Array Syntax) (mkAppend : Syntax → Syntax → MacroM Syntax) (mkElem : Syntax → MacroM Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
let mut i := 0
let mut result := Syntax.missing
for elem in chunks do
let elem ← match elem.isInterpolatedStrLit? with
| none => mkElem elem
| some str => mkElem (Syntax.mkStrLit str)
if i == 0 then
result := elem
else
result ← mkAppend result elem
i := i+1
return result
open TSyntax.Compat in
def expandInterpolatedStr (interpStr : TSyntax interpolatedStrKind) (type : Term) (toTypeFn : Term) : MacroM Term := do
let r ← expandInterpolatedStrChunks interpStr.raw.getArgs (fun a b => `($a ++ $b)) (fun a => `($toTypeFn $a))
`(($r : $type))
end TSyntax
namespace Meta
inductive TransparencyMode where
| all | default | reducible | instances
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
inductive EtaStructMode where
/-- Enable eta for structure and classes. -/
| all
/-- Enable eta only for structures that are not classes. -/
| notClasses
/-- Disable eta for structures and classes. -/
| none
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
namespace DSimp
structure Config where
zeta : Bool := true
beta : Bool := true
eta : Bool := true
etaStruct : EtaStructMode := .all
iota : Bool := true
proj : Bool := true
decide : Bool := true
autoUnfold : Bool := false
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
end DSimp
namespace Simp
def defaultMaxSteps := 100000
structure Config where
maxSteps : Nat := defaultMaxSteps
maxDischargeDepth : Nat := 2
contextual : Bool := false
memoize : Bool := true
singlePass : Bool := false
zeta : Bool := true
beta : Bool := true
eta : Bool := true
etaStruct : EtaStructMode := .all
iota : Bool := true
proj : Bool := true
decide : Bool := true
arith : Bool := false
autoUnfold : Bool := false
/--
If `dsimp := true`, then switches to `dsimp` on dependent arguments where there is no congruence theorem that allows
`simp` to visit them. If `dsimp := false`, then argument is not visited.
-/
dsimp : Bool := true
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
-- Configuration object for `simp_all`
structure ConfigCtx extends Config where
contextual := true
def neutralConfig : Simp.Config := {
zeta := false
beta := false
eta := false
iota := false
proj := false
decide := false
arith := false
autoUnfold := false
}
end Simp
namespace Rewrite
structure Config where
transparency : TransparencyMode := TransparencyMode.reducible
offsetCnstrs : Bool := true
end Rewrite
end Meta
namespace Parser.Tactic
/-- `erw [rules]` is a shorthand for `rw (config := { transparency := .default }) [rules]`.
This does rewriting up to unfolding of regular definitions (by comparison to regular `rw`
which only unfolds `@[reducible]` definitions). -/
macro "erw " s:rwRuleSeq loc:(location)? : tactic =>
`(tactic| rw (config := { transparency := .default }) $s $(loc)?)
syntax simpAllKind := atomic("(" &"all") " := " &"true" ")"
syntax dsimpKind := atomic("(" &"dsimp") " := " &"true" ")"
macro (name := declareSimpLikeTactic) doc?:(docComment)? "declare_simp_like_tactic" opt:((simpAllKind <|> dsimpKind)?) tacName:ident tacToken:str updateCfg:term : command => do
let (kind, tkn, stx) ←
if opt.raw.isNone then
pure (← `(``simp), ← `("simp"), ← `($[$doc?:docComment]? syntax (name := $tacName) $tacToken:str (config)? (discharger)? (&" only")? (" [" (simpStar <|> simpErase <|> simpLemma),* "]")? (location)? : tactic))
else if opt.raw[0].getKind == ``simpAllKind then
pure (← `(``simpAll), ← `("simp_all"), ← `($[$doc?:docComment]? syntax (name := $tacName) $tacToken:str (config)? (discharger)? (&" only")? (" [" (simpErase <|> simpLemma),* "]")? : tactic))
else
pure (← `(``dsimp), ← `("dsimp"), ← `($[$doc?:docComment]? syntax (name := $tacName) $tacToken:str (config)? (discharger)? (&" only")? (" [" (simpErase <|> simpLemma),* "]")? (location)? : tactic))
`($stx:command
@[macro $tacName] def expandSimp : Macro := fun s => do
let c ← match s[1][0] with
| `(config| (config := $$c)) => `(config| (config := $updateCfg $$c))
| _ => `(config| (config := $updateCfg {}))
let s := s.setKind $kind
let s := s.setArg 0 (mkAtomFrom s[0] $tkn (canonical := true))
let r := s.setArg 1 (mkNullNode #[c])
return r)
/-- `simp!` is shorthand for `simp` with `autoUnfold := true`.
This will rewrite with all equation lemmas, which can be used to
partially evaluate many definitions. -/
declare_simp_like_tactic simpAutoUnfold "simp! " fun (c : Lean.Meta.Simp.Config) => { c with autoUnfold := true }
/-- `simp_arith` is shorthand for `simp` with `arith := true`.
This enables the use of normalization by linear arithmetic. -/
declare_simp_like_tactic simpArith "simp_arith " fun (c : Lean.Meta.Simp.Config) => { c with arith := true }
/-- `simp_arith!` is shorthand for `simp_arith` with `autoUnfold := true`.
This will rewrite with all equation lemmas, which can be used to
partially evaluate many definitions. -/
declare_simp_like_tactic simpArithAutoUnfold "simp_arith! " fun (c : Lean.Meta.Simp.Config) => { c with arith := true, autoUnfold := true }
/-- `simp_all!` is shorthand for `simp_all` with `autoUnfold := true`.
This will rewrite with all equation lemmas, which can be used to
partially evaluate many definitions. -/
declare_simp_like_tactic (all := true) simpAllAutoUnfold "simp_all! " fun (c : Lean.Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx) => { c with autoUnfold := true }
/-- `simp_all_arith` combines the effects of `simp_all` and `simp_arith`. -/
declare_simp_like_tactic (all := true) simpAllArith "simp_all_arith " fun (c : Lean.Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx) => { c with arith := true }
/-- `simp_all_arith!` combines the effects of `simp_all`, `simp_arith` and `simp!`. -/
declare_simp_like_tactic (all := true) simpAllArithAutoUnfold "simp_all_arith! " fun (c : Lean.Meta.Simp.ConfigCtx) => { c with arith := true, autoUnfold := true }
/-- `dsimp!` is shorthand for `dsimp` with `autoUnfold := true`.
This will rewrite with all equation lemmas, which can be used to
partially evaluate many definitions. -/
declare_simp_like_tactic (dsimp := true) dsimpAutoUnfold "dsimp! " fun (c : Lean.Meta.DSimp.Config) => { c with autoUnfold := true }
end Parser.Tactic
end Lean
|
3906668fd4dd1e192785fac5aa9cefb661afc79a | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /tests/lean/run/cpdt.lean | 086c8b7f501dd4573acd3889c892134b82d89b04 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,075 | lean | /- "Proving in the Large" chapter of CPDT -/
inductive exp : Type
| Const (n : nat) : exp
| Plus (e1 e2 : exp) : exp
| Mult (e1 e2 : exp) : exp
open exp
def eeval : exp → nat
| (Const n) := n
| (Plus e1 e2) := eeval e1 + eeval e2
| (Mult e1 e2) := eeval e1 * eeval e2
def times (k : nat) : exp → exp
| (Const n) := Const (k * n)
| (Plus e1 e2) := Plus (times e1) (times e2)
| (Mult e1 e2) := Mult (times e1) e2
def reassoc : exp → exp
| (Const n) := (Const n)
| (Plus e1 e2) :=
let e1' := reassoc e1 in
let e2' := reassoc e2 in
match e2' with
| (Plus e21 e22) := Plus (Plus e1' e21) e22
| _ := Plus e1' e2'
end
| (Mult e1 e2) :=
let e1' := reassoc e1 in
let e2' := reassoc e2 in
match e2' with
| (Mult e21 e22) := Mult (Mult e1' e21) e22
| _ := Mult e1' e2'
end
attribute [simp] mul_add times reassoc eeval
theorem eeval_times (k e) : eeval (times k e) = k * eeval e :=
by induction e; simph
theorem reassoc_correct (e) : eeval (reassoc e) = eeval e :=
by induction e; simph; cases (reassoc e2); rsimp
|
f0a405822706ab4524198f859b575e1498df00b9 | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /src/algebra/char_zero.lean | 227874cf64fa955bfb5adc30c48683acdf1b170c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,106 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Natural homomorphism from the natural numbers into a monoid with one.
-/
import data.nat.cast algebra.group algebra.field
/-- Typeclass for monoids with characteristic zero.
(This is usually stated on fields but it makes sense for any additive monoid with 1.) -/
class char_zero (α : Type*) [add_monoid α] [has_one α] : Prop :=
(cast_inj : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, (m : α) = n ↔ m = n)
theorem char_zero_of_inj_zero {α : Type*} [add_monoid α] [has_one α]
(add_left_cancel : ∀ a b c : α, a + b = a + c → b = c)
(H : ∀ n:ℕ, (n:α) = 0 → n = 0) : char_zero α :=
⟨λ m n, ⟨suffices ∀ {m n : ℕ}, (m:α) = n → m ≤ n,
from λ h, le_antisymm (this h) (this h.symm),
λ m n h, (le_total m n).elim id $ λ h2, le_of_eq $ begin
cases nat.le.dest h2 with k e,
suffices : k = 0, {rw [← e, this, add_zero]},
apply H, apply add_left_cancel n,
rw [← nat.cast_add, e, add_zero, h]
end,
congr_arg _⟩⟩
theorem add_group.char_zero_of_inj_zero {α : Type*} [add_group α] [has_one α]
(H : ∀ n:ℕ, (n:α) = 0 → n = 0) : char_zero α :=
char_zero_of_inj_zero (@add_left_cancel _ _) H
theorem ordered_cancel_comm_monoid.char_zero_of_inj_zero {α : Type*}
[ordered_cancel_comm_monoid α] [has_one α]
(H : ∀ n:ℕ, (n:α) = 0 → n = 0) : char_zero α :=
char_zero_of_inj_zero (@add_left_cancel _ _) H
instance linear_ordered_semiring.to_char_zero {α : Type*}
[linear_ordered_semiring α] : char_zero α :=
ordered_cancel_comm_monoid.char_zero_of_inj_zero $
λ n h, nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $
(@nat.cast_le α _ _ _).1 (le_of_eq h)
namespace nat
variables {α : Type*} [add_monoid α] [has_one α] [char_zero α]
@[simp] theorem cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n :=
char_zero.cast_inj _
theorem cast_injective : function.injective (coe : ℕ → α)
| m n := cast_inj.1
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : α) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by rw [← cast_zero, cast_inj]
@[simp] theorem cast_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : α) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr cast_eq_zero
end nat
lemma two_ne_zero' {α : Type*} [add_monoid α] [has_one α] [char_zero α] : (2:α) ≠ 0 :=
have ((2:ℕ):α) ≠ 0, from nat.cast_ne_zero.2 dec_trivial,
by rwa [nat.cast_succ, nat.cast_one] at this
section
variables {α : Type*} [domain α] [char_zero α]
lemma add_self_eq_zero {a : α} : a + a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simp only [(two_mul a).symm, mul_eq_zero, two_ne_zero', false_or]
lemma bit0_eq_zero {a : α} : bit0 a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := add_self_eq_zero
end
section
variables {α : Type*} [division_ring α] [char_zero α]
@[simp] lemma half_add_self (a : α) : (a + a) / 2 = a :=
by rw [← mul_two, mul_div_cancel a two_ne_zero']
@[simp] lemma add_halves' (a : α) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a :=
by rw [← add_div, half_add_self]
lemma sub_half (a : α) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 :=
by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_halves']
lemma half_sub (a : α) : a / 2 - a = - (a / 2) :=
by rw [← neg_sub, sub_half]
end |
67b1a07c44bbbb978ec7a4772a418f4030190f25 | 5ae26df177f810c5006841e9c73dc56e01b978d7 | /src/category/fold.lean | 847a097012844420a6de6f4b25a7a449e1e08c4a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/mathlib | 98322577c460bc6b1fe5c21f42ce33ad1c3e5558 | a2a867e827c2a6702beb9efc2b9282bd801d5f9a | refs/heads/master | 1,583,848,251,477 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 129,409,993 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,565,164,817,000 | 1,523,628,059,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,624 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Sean Leather
List folds generalized to `traversable`. Informally, we can think of
`foldl` as a special case of `traverse` where we do not care about the
reconstructed data structure and, in a state monad, we care about the
final state.
The obvious way to define `foldl` would be to use the state monad but it
is nicer to reason about a more abstract interface with `fold_map` as a
primitive and `fold_map_hom` as a defining property.
def fold_map {α ω} [has_one ω] [has_mul ω] (f : α → ω) : t α → ω := ...
lemma fold_map_hom (α β)
[monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f]
(g : γ → α) (x : t γ) :
f (fold_map g x) = fold_map (f ∘ g) x :=
...
`fold_map` uses a monoid ω to accumulate a value for every element of
a data structure and `fold_map_hom` uses a monoid homomorphism to
substitute the monoid used by `fold_map`. The two are sufficient to
define `foldl`, `foldr` and `to_list`. `to_list` permits the
formulation of specifications in terms of operations on lists.
Each fold function can be defined using a specialized
monoid. `to_list` uses a free monoid represented as a list with
concatenation while `foldl` uses endofunctions together with function
composition.
The definition through monoids uses `traverse` together with the
applicative functor `const m` (where `m` is the monoid). As an
implementation, `const` guarantees that no resource is spent on
reconstructing the structure during traversal.
A special class could be defined for `foldable`, similarly to Haskell,
but the author cannot think of instances of `foldable` that are not also
`traversable`.
-/
import tactic.squeeze
import algebra.group algebra.opposites
import data.list.basic
import category.traversable.instances category.traversable.lemmas
import category_theory.category category_theory.endomorphism category_theory.types category_theory.instances.kleisli
import category.applicative
universes u v
open ulift category_theory opposite
namespace monoid
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [monad m]
variables {α β : Type u}
/--
For a list, foldl f x [y₀,y₁] reduces as follows
calc foldl f x [y₀,y₁]
= foldl f (f x y₀) [y₁] : rfl
... = foldl f (f (f x y₀) y₁) [] : rfl
... = f (f x y₀) y₁ : rfl
with f : α → β → α
x : α
[y₀,y₁] : list β
We can view the above as a composition of functions:
... = f (f x y₀) y₁ : rfl
... = flip f y₁ (flip f y₀ x) : rfl
... = (flip f y₁ ∘ flip f y₀) x : rfl
We can use traverse and const to construct this composition:
calc const.run (traverse (λ y, const.mk' (flip f y)) [y₀,y₁]) x
= const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*> traverse (λ y, const.mk' (flip f y)) [y₁]) x
... = const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*> ( (::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> traverse (λ y, const.mk' (flip f y)) [] )) x
... = const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*> ( (::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> pure [] )) x
... = const.run ( ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> pure []) ∘ ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀)) ) x
... = const.run ( const.mk' (flip f y₁) ∘ const.mk' (flip f y₀) ) x
... = const.run ( flip f y₁ ∘ flip f y₀ ) x
... = f (f x y₀) y₁
And this is how `const` turns a monoid into an applicative functor and
how the monoid of endofunctions define `foldl`.
-/
@[reducible] def foldl (α : Type u) : Type u := (End α)ᵒᵖ
def foldl.mk (f : α → α) : foldl α := op f
def foldl.get (x : foldl α) : α → α := unop x
def foldl.of_free_monoid (f : β → α → β) (xs : free_monoid α) : monoid.foldl β :=
op $ flip (list.foldl f) xs
@[reducible] def foldr (α : Type u) : Type u := End α
def foldr.mk (f : α → α) : foldr α := f
def foldr.get (x : foldr α) : α → α := x
def foldr.of_free_monoid (f : α → β → β) (xs : free_monoid α) : monoid.foldr β :=
flip (list.foldr f) xs
@[reducible] def mfoldl (m : Type u → Type u) [monad m] (α : Type u) : Type u := opposite $ End $ Kleisli.mk m α
def mfoldl.mk (f : α → m α) : mfoldl m α := op f
def mfoldl.get (x : mfoldl m α) : α → m α := unop x
def mfoldl.of_free_monoid (f : β → α → m β) (xs : free_monoid α) : monoid.mfoldl m β :=
op $ flip (list.mfoldl f) xs
@[reducible] def mfoldr (m : Type u → Type u) [monad m] (α : Type u) : Type u :=
End $ Kleisli.mk m α
def mfoldr.mk (f : α → m α) : mfoldr m α := f
def mfoldr.get (x : mfoldr m α) : α → m α := x
def mfoldr.of_free_monoid (f : α → β → m β) (xs : free_monoid α) : monoid.mfoldr m β :=
flip (list.mfoldr f) xs
end monoid
namespace traversable
open monoid functor
section defs
variables {α β : Type u} {t : Type u → Type u} [traversable t]
def fold_map {α ω} [has_one ω] [has_mul ω] (f : α → ω) : t α → ω :=
traverse (const.mk' ∘ f)
def foldl (f : α → β → α) (x : α) (xs : t β) : α :=
(fold_map (foldl.mk ∘ flip f) xs).get x
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (x : β) (xs : t α) : β :=
(fold_map (foldr.mk ∘ f) xs).get x
/--
Conceptually, `to_list` collects all the elements of a collection
in a list. This idea is formalized by
`lemma to_list_spec (x : t α) : to_list x = fold_map free_monoid.mk x`.
The definition of `to_list` is based on `foldl` and `list.cons` for
speed. It is faster than using `fold_map free_monoid.mk` because, by
using `foldl` and `list.cons`, each insertion is done in constant
time. As a consequence, `to_list` performs in linear.
On the other hand, `fold_map free_monoid.mk` creates a singleton list
around each element and concatenates all the resulting lists. In
`xs ++ ys`, concatenation takes a time proportional to `length xs`. Since
the order in which concatenation is evaluated is unspecified, nothing
prevents each element of the traversable to be appended at the end
`xs ++ [x]` which would yield a `O(n²)` run time. -/
def to_list : t α → list α :=
list.reverse ∘ foldl (flip list.cons) []
def length (xs : t α) : ℕ :=
down $ foldl (λ l _, up $ l.down + 1) (up 0) xs
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [monad m]
def mfoldl (f : α → β → m α) (x : α) (xs : t β) : m α :=
(fold_map (mfoldl.mk ∘ flip f) xs).get x
def mfoldr (f : α → β → m β) (x : β) (xs : t α) : m β :=
(fold_map (mfoldr.mk ∘ f) xs).get x
end defs
section applicative_transformation
variables {α β γ : Type u}
open function (hiding const) is_monoid_hom
def map_fold [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f] :
applicative_transformation (const α) (const β) :=
{ app := λ x, f,
preserves_seq' := by { intros, simp only [map_mul f], },
preserves_pure' := by { intros, simp only [map_one f] } }
def free.mk : α → free_monoid α := list.ret
def free.map (f : α → β) : free_monoid α → free_monoid β := list.map f
lemma free.map_eq_map (f : α → β) (xs : list α) :
f <$> xs = free.map f xs := rfl
instance (f : α → β) : is_monoid_hom (free.map f) :=
{ map_mul := λ x y, by simp only [free.map, list.map_append, free_add_monoid.add_def],
map_one := by simp only [free.map, list.map, free_add_monoid.zero_def] }
instance fold_foldl (f : β → α → β) :
is_monoid_hom (foldl.of_free_monoid f) :=
{ map_one := rfl,
map_mul := by intros; simp only [free_monoid.mul_def, foldl.of_free_monoid, flip, unop_op, list.foldl_append, op_inj_iff]; refl }
lemma foldl.unop_of_free_monoid (f : β → α → β) (xs : free_monoid α) (a : β) :
unop (foldl.of_free_monoid f xs) a = list.foldl f a xs := rfl
instance fold_foldr (f : α → β → β) :
is_monoid_hom (foldr.of_free_monoid f) :=
{ map_one := rfl,
map_mul := by intros; simp only [free_monoid.mul_def, foldr.of_free_monoid, list.foldr_append, flip]; refl }
variables (m : Type u → Type u) [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
@[simp]
lemma mfoldl.unop_of_free_monoid (f : β → α → m β) (xs : free_monoid α) (a : β) :
unop (mfoldl.of_free_monoid f xs) a = list.mfoldl f a xs := rfl
instance fold_mfoldl (f : β → α → m β) :
is_monoid_hom (mfoldl.of_free_monoid f) :=
{ map_one := rfl,
map_mul := by intros; apply unop_inj; ext; apply list.mfoldl_append }
instance fold_mfoldr (f : α → β → m β) :
is_monoid_hom (mfoldr.of_free_monoid f) :=
{ map_one := rfl,
map_mul := by intros; ext; apply list.mfoldr_append }
variables {t : Type u → Type u} [traversable t] [is_lawful_traversable t]
open is_lawful_traversable
lemma fold_map_hom
[monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f]
(g : γ → α) (x : t γ) :
f (fold_map g x) = fold_map (f ∘ g) x :=
calc f (fold_map g x)
= f (traverse (const.mk' ∘ g) x) : rfl
... = (map_fold f).app _ (traverse (const.mk' ∘ g) x) : rfl
... = traverse ((map_fold f).app _ ∘ (const.mk' ∘ g)) x : naturality (map_fold f) _ _
... = fold_map (f ∘ g) x : rfl
lemma fold_map_hom_free
[monoid β] (f : free_monoid α → β) [is_monoid_hom f] (x : t α) :
f (fold_map free.mk x) = fold_map (f ∘ free.mk) x :=
fold_map_hom _ _ x
variable {m}
lemma fold_mfoldl_cons (f : α → β → m α) (x : β) (y : α) :
list.mfoldl f y (free.mk x) = f y x :=
by simp only [free.mk, list.ret, list.mfoldl, bind_pure]
lemma fold_mfoldr_cons (f : β → α → m α) (x : β) (y : α) :
list.mfoldr f y (free.mk x) = f x y :=
by simp only [free.mk, list.ret, list.mfoldr, pure_bind]
end applicative_transformation
section equalities
open is_lawful_traversable list (cons)
variables {α β γ : Type u}
variables {t : Type u → Type u} [traversable t] [is_lawful_traversable t]
@[simp]
lemma foldl.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk (f : α → β → α) : foldl.of_free_monoid f ∘ free.mk = foldl.mk ∘ flip f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma foldr.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk (f : β → α → α) : foldr.of_free_monoid f ∘ free.mk = foldr.mk ∘ f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma mfoldl.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m] (f : α → β → m α) : mfoldl.of_free_monoid f ∘ free.mk = mfoldl.mk ∘ flip f :=
by ext; simp only [(∘), mfoldl.of_free_monoid, mfoldl.mk, flip, fold_mfoldl_cons]; refl
@[simp]
lemma mfoldr.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m] (f : β → α → m α) : mfoldr.of_free_monoid f ∘ free.mk = mfoldr.mk ∘ f :=
by { ext, simp only [(∘), mfoldr.of_free_monoid, mfoldr.mk, flip, fold_mfoldr_cons] }
lemma to_list_spec (xs : t α) :
to_list xs = (fold_map free.mk xs : free_monoid _) :=
eq.symm $
calc fold_map free.mk xs
= (fold_map free.mk xs).reverse.reverse : by simp only [list.reverse_reverse]
... = (list.foldr cons [] (fold_map free.mk xs).reverse).reverse
: by simp only [list.foldr_eta]
... = (unop (foldl.of_free_monoid (flip cons) (fold_map free.mk xs)) []).reverse
: by simp only [flip,list.foldr_reverse,foldl.of_free_monoid, unop_op]
... = to_list xs : begin
rw fold_map_hom_free (foldl.of_free_monoid (flip cons)),
simp only [to_list, foldl, list.reverse_inj, foldl.get, foldl.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk],
all_goals { apply_instance }
end
lemma fold_map_map [monoid γ] (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (xs : t α) :
fold_map g (f <$> xs) = fold_map (g ∘ f) xs :=
by simp only [fold_map,traverse_map]
lemma foldl_to_list (f : α → β → α) (xs : t β) (x : α) :
foldl f x xs = list.foldl f x (to_list xs) :=
by { rw ← foldl.unop_of_free_monoid,
simp only [foldl, to_list_spec, fold_map_hom_free (foldl.of_free_monoid f), foldl.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk, foldl.get] }
lemma foldr_to_list (f : α → β → β) (xs : t α) (x : β) :
foldr f x xs = list.foldr f x (to_list xs) :=
by { change _ = foldr.of_free_monoid _ _ _,
simp only [foldr, to_list_spec, fold_map_hom_free (foldr.of_free_monoid f), foldr.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk, foldr.get] }
lemma to_list_map (f : α → β) (xs : t α) :
to_list (f <$> xs) = f <$> to_list xs :=
by simp only [to_list_spec,free.map_eq_map,fold_map_hom (free.map f), fold_map_map]; refl
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldl f a (g <$> l) = foldl (λ x y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by simp only [foldl, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldr f a (g <$> l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by simp only [foldr, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
@[simp] theorem to_list_eq_self {xs : list α} : to_list xs = xs :=
begin
simp only [to_list_spec, fold_map, traverse],
induction xs,
case list.nil { refl },
case list.cons : _ _ ih { unfold list.traverse list.ret, rw ih, refl }
end
theorem length_to_list {xs : t α} : length xs = list.length (to_list xs) :=
begin
unfold length,
rw foldl_to_list,
generalize : to_list xs = ys,
let f := λ (n : ℕ) (a : α), n + 1,
transitivity list.foldl f 0 ys,
{ generalize : 0 = n,
induction ys with _ _ ih generalizing n,
{ simp only [list.foldl_nil] },
{ simp only [list.foldl, ih (n+1)] } },
{ induction ys with _ tl ih,
{ simp only [list.length, list.foldl_nil] },
{ simp only [list.foldl, list.length],
transitivity list.foldl f 0 tl + 1,
{ exact eq.symm (list.foldl_hom (+1) f f 0 (λ _ _, rfl) _) },
{ rw ih } } }
end
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
lemma mfoldl_to_list {f : α → β → m α} {x : α} {xs : t β} :
mfoldl f x xs = list.mfoldl f x (to_list xs) :=
by { change _ = unop (mfoldl.of_free_monoid f (to_list xs)) x,
simp only [mfoldl, to_list_spec, fold_map_hom_free (mfoldl.of_free_monoid f), mfoldl.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk, mfoldl.get] }
lemma mfoldr_to_list (f : α → β → m β) (x : β) (xs : t α) :
mfoldr f x xs = list.mfoldr f x (to_list xs) :=
by { change _ = mfoldr.of_free_monoid f (to_list xs) x,
simp only [mfoldr, to_list_spec, fold_map_hom_free (mfoldr.of_free_monoid f), mfoldr.of_free_monoid_comp_free_mk, mfoldr.get] }
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → m α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
mfoldl f a (g <$> l) = mfoldl (λ x y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by simp only [mfoldl, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → m α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
mfoldr f a (g <$> l) = mfoldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by simp only [mfoldr, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
end equalities
end traversable
|
b815f045a599b815ac35b925d3041e74fe0b60d5 | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/analysis/normed_space/bounded_linear_maps.lean | 3c9e109a0e4ab21493c29cedc30f3fad4124ecea | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,326 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import analysis.normed_space.multilinear
import analysis.normed_space.units
import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics
/-!
# Bounded linear maps
This file defines a class stating that a map between normed vector spaces is (bi)linear and
continuous.
Instead of asking for continuity, the definition takes the equivalent condition (because the space
is normed) that `∥f x∥` is bounded by a multiple of `∥x∥`. Hence the "bounded" in the name refers to
`∥f x∥/∥x∥` rather than `∥f x∥` itself.
## Main definitions
* `is_bounded_linear_map`: Class stating that a map `f : E → F` is linear and has `∥f x∥` bounded
by a multiple of `∥x∥`.
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map`: Class stating that a map `f : E × F → G` is bilinear and continuous,
but through the simpler to provide statement that `∥f (x, y)∥` is bounded by a multiple of
`∥x∥ * ∥y∥`
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map.linear_deriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a linear map.
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map.deriv`: Derivative of a continuous bilinear map as a continuous linear
map. The proof that it is indeed the derivative is `is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_at` in
`analysis.calculus.fderiv`.
## Main theorems
* `is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous`: A bounded bilinear map is continuous.
* `linear_map.norm_apply_of_isometry`: A linear isometry preserves the norm.
* `continuous_linear_equiv.is_open`: The continuous linear equivalences are an open subset of the
set of continuous linear maps between a pair of Banach spaces. Placed in this file because its
proof uses `is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous`.
## Notes
The main use of this file is `is_bounded_bilinear_map`. The file `analysis.normed_space.multilinear`
already expounds the theory of multilinear maps, but the `2`-variables case is sufficiently simpler
to currently deserve its own treatment.
`is_bounded_linear_map` is effectively an unbundled version of `continuous_linear_map` (defined
in `topology.algebra.module`, theory over normed spaces developed in
`analysis.normed_space.operator_norm`), albeit the name disparity. A bundled
`continuous_linear_map` is to be preferred over a `is_bounded_linear_map` hypothesis. Historical
artifact, really.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators topological_space
open filter (tendsto) metric
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{G : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
/-- A function `f` satisfies `is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f` if it is linear and satisfies the
inequality `∥f x∥ ≤ M * ∥x∥` for some positive constant `M`. -/
structure is_bounded_linear_map (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F] (f : E → F)
extends is_linear_map 𝕜 f : Prop :=
(bound : ∃ M, 0 < M ∧ ∀ x : E, ∥f x∥ ≤ M * ∥x∥)
lemma is_linear_map.with_bound
{f : E → F} (hf : is_linear_map 𝕜 f) (M : ℝ) (h : ∀ x : E, ∥f x∥ ≤ M * ∥x∥) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f :=
⟨ hf, classical.by_cases
(assume : M ≤ 0, ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ x,
(h x).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (this.trans zero_le_one) (norm_nonneg x)⟩)
(assume : ¬ M ≤ 0, ⟨M, lt_of_not_ge this, h⟩)⟩
/-- A continuous linear map satisfies `is_bounded_linear_map` -/
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f :=
{ bound := f.bound,
..f.to_linear_map.is_linear }
namespace is_bounded_linear_map
/-- Construct a linear map from a function `f` satisfying `is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f`. -/
def to_linear_map (f : E → F) (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) : E →ₗ[𝕜] F :=
(is_linear_map.mk' _ h.to_is_linear_map)
/-- Construct a continuous linear map from is_bounded_linear_map -/
def to_continuous_linear_map {f : E → F} (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
{ cont := let ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩ := hf.bound in linear_map.continuous_of_bound _ C hC,
..to_linear_map f hf}
lemma zero : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (x:E), (0:F)) :=
(0 : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).is_linear.with_bound 0 $ by simp [le_refl]
lemma id : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (x:E), x) :=
linear_map.id.is_linear.with_bound 1 $ by simp [le_refl]
lemma fst : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, x.1) :=
begin
refine (linear_map.fst 𝕜 E F).is_linear.with_bound 1 (λ x, _),
rw one_mul,
exact le_max_left _ _
end
lemma snd : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, x.2) :=
begin
refine (linear_map.snd 𝕜 E F).is_linear.with_bound 1 (λ x, _),
rw one_mul,
exact le_max_right _ _
end
variables {f g : E → F}
lemma smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (c • f) :=
let ⟨hlf, M, hMp, hM⟩ := hf in
(c • hlf.mk' f).is_linear.with_bound (∥c∥ * M) $ λ x,
calc ∥c • f x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥f x∥ : norm_smul c (f x)
... ≤ ∥c∥ * (M * ∥x∥) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hM _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = (∥c∥ * M) * ∥x∥ : (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
lemma neg (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ e, -f e) :=
begin
rw show (λ e, -f e) = (λ e, (-1 : 𝕜) • f e), { funext, simp },
exact smul (-1) hf
end
lemma add (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ e, f e + g e) :=
let ⟨hlf, Mf, hMfp, hMf⟩ := hf in
let ⟨hlg, Mg, hMgp, hMg⟩ := hg in
(hlf.mk' _ + hlg.mk' _).is_linear.with_bound (Mf + Mg) $ λ x,
calc ∥f x + g x∥ ≤ Mf * ∥x∥ + Mg * ∥x∥ : norm_add_le_of_le (hMf x) (hMg x)
... ≤ (Mf + Mg) * ∥x∥ : by rw add_mul
lemma sub (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ e, f e - g e) :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using add hf (neg hg)
lemma comp {g : F → G}
(hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g) (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (g ∘ f) :=
(hg.to_continuous_linear_map.comp hf.to_continuous_linear_map).is_bounded_linear_map
protected lemma tendsto (x : E) (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
let ⟨hf, M, hMp, hM⟩ := hf in
tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
squeeze_zero (λ e, norm_nonneg _)
(λ e,
calc ∥f e - f x∥ = ∥hf.mk' f (e - x)∥ : by rw (hf.mk' _).map_sub e x; refl
... ≤ M * ∥e - x∥ : hM (e - x))
(suffices tendsto (λ (e : E), M * ∥e - x∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (M * 0)), by simpa,
tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_norm_sub_self _))
lemma continuous (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ _, hf.tendsto _
lemma lim_zero_bounded_linear_map (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
tendsto f (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
(hf.1.mk' _).map_zero ▸ continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 hf.continuous 0
section
open asymptotics filter
theorem is_O_id {f : E → F} (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) (l : filter E) :
is_O f (λ x, x) l :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hM⟩ := h.bound in is_O.of_bound _ (mem_of_superset univ_mem (λ x _, hM x))
theorem is_O_comp {E : Type*} {g : F → G} (hg : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 g)
{f : E → F} (l : filter E) : is_O (λ x', g (f x')) f l :=
(hg.is_O_id ⊤).comp_tendsto le_top
theorem is_O_sub {f : E → F} (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f)
(l : filter E) (x : E) : is_O (λ x', f (x' - x)) (λ x', x' - x) l :=
is_O_comp h l
end
end is_bounded_linear_map
section
variables {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι]
/-- Taking the cartesian product of two continuous multilinear maps
is a bounded linear operation. -/
lemma is_bounded_linear_map_prod_multilinear
{E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, normed_group (E i)] [∀ i, normed_space 𝕜 (E i)] :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜
(λ p : (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E F) × (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G), p.1.prod p.2) :=
{ map_add := λ p₁ p₂, by { ext1 m, refl },
map_smul := λ c p, by { ext1 m, refl },
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ p, begin
rw one_mul,
apply continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λ m, _),
rw [continuous_multilinear_map.prod_apply, norm_prod_le_iff],
split,
{ exact (p.1.le_op_norm m).trans
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (norm_fst_le p) (finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _))) },
{ exact (p.2.le_op_norm m).trans
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (norm_snd_le p) (finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _))) },
end⟩ }
/-- Given a fixed continuous linear map `g`, associating to a continuous multilinear map `f` the
continuous multilinear map `f (g m₁, ..., g mₙ)` is a bounded linear operation. -/
lemma is_bounded_linear_map_continuous_multilinear_map_comp_linear (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : ι), E) F,
f.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ _, g)) :=
begin
refine is_linear_map.with_bound ⟨λ f₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl }, λ c f, by { ext m, refl }⟩
(∥g∥ ^ (fintype.card ι)) (λ f, _),
apply continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ _ (λ m, _),
{ apply_rules [mul_nonneg, pow_nonneg, norm_nonneg] },
calc ∥f (g ∘ m)∥ ≤
∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥g (m i)∥ : f.le_op_norm _
... ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, (∥g∥ * ∥m i∥) : begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _),
exact finset.prod_le_prod (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _) (λ i hi, g.le_op_norm _)
end
... = ∥g∥ ^ fintype.card ι * ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :
by { simp [finset.prod_mul_distrib, finset.card_univ], ring }
end
end
section bilinear_map
variable (𝕜)
/-- A map `f : E × F → G` satisfies `is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f` if it is bilinear and
continuous. -/
structure is_bounded_bilinear_map (f : E × F → G) : Prop :=
(add_left : ∀ (x₁ x₂ : E) (y : F), f (x₁ + x₂, y) = f (x₁, y) + f (x₂, y))
(smul_left : ∀ (c : 𝕜) (x : E) (y : F), f (c • x, y) = c • f (x, y))
(add_right : ∀ (x : E) (y₁ y₂ : F), f (x, y₁ + y₂) = f (x, y₁) + f (x, y₂))
(smul_right : ∀ (c : 𝕜) (x : E) (y : F), f (x, c • y) = c • f (x,y))
(bound : ∃ C > 0, ∀ (x : E) (y : F), ∥f (x, y)∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∥y∥)
variable {𝕜}
variable {f : E × F → G}
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_bilinear_map (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) :=
{ add_left := λ x₁ x₂ y, by rw [f.map_add, continuous_linear_map.add_apply],
smul_left := λ c x y, by rw [f.map_smul _, continuous_linear_map.smul_apply],
add_right := λ x, (f x).map_add,
smul_right := λ c x y, (f x).map_smul c y,
bound := ⟨max ∥f∥ 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _),
λ x y, (f.le_op_norm₂ x y).trans $
by apply_rules [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, norm_nonneg, le_max_left]⟩ }
protected lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_O (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
asymptotics.is_O f (λ p : E × F, ∥p.1∥ * ∥p.2∥) ⊤ :=
let ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩ := h.bound in asymptotics.is_O.of_bound _ $
filter.eventually_of_forall $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simpa [mul_assoc] using hC x y
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_O_comp {α : Type*} (H : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f)
{g : α → E} {h : α → F} {l : filter α} :
asymptotics.is_O (λ x, f (g x, h x)) (λ x, ∥g x∥ * ∥h x∥) l :=
H.is_O.comp_tendsto le_top
protected lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_O' (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
asymptotics.is_O f (λ p : E × F, ∥p∥ * ∥p∥) ⊤ :=
h.is_O.trans (asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod'.norm_norm.mul asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod'.norm_norm)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.map_sub_left (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {x y : E} {z : F} :
f (x - y, z) = f (x, z) - f(y, z) :=
calc f (x - y, z) = f (x + (-1 : 𝕜) • y, z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
... = f (x, z) + (-1 : 𝕜) • f (y, z) : by simp only [h.add_left, h.smul_left]
... = f (x, z) - f (y, z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.map_sub_right (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {x : E} {y z : F} :
f (x, y - z) = f (x, y) - f (x, z) :=
calc f (x, y - z) = f (x, y + (-1 : 𝕜) • z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
... = f (x, y) + (-1 : 𝕜) • f (x, z) : by simp only [h.add_right, h.smul_right]
... = f (x, y) - f (x, z) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
continuous f :=
begin
have one_ne : (1:ℝ) ≠ 0 := by simp,
obtain ⟨C, (Cpos : 0 < C), hC⟩ := h.bound,
rw continuous_iff_continuous_at,
intros x,
have H : ∀ (a:E) (b:F), ∥f (a, b)∥ ≤ C * ∥∥a∥ * ∥b∥∥,
{ intros a b,
simpa [mul_assoc] using hC a b },
have h₁ : asymptotics.is_o (λ e : E × F, f (e.1 - x.1, e.2)) (λ e, (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 x),
{ refine (asymptotics.is_O_of_le' (𝓝 x) (λ e, H (e.1 - x.1) e.2)).trans_is_o _,
rw asymptotics.is_o_const_iff one_ne,
convert ((continuous_fst.sub continuous_const).norm.mul continuous_snd.norm).continuous_at,
{ simp },
apply_instance },
have h₂ : asymptotics.is_o (λ e : E × F, f (x.1, e.2 - x.2)) (λ e, (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 x),
{ refine (asymptotics.is_O_of_le' (𝓝 x) (λ e, H x.1 (e.2 - x.2))).trans_is_o _,
rw asymptotics.is_o_const_iff one_ne,
convert (continuous_const.mul (continuous_snd.sub continuous_const).norm).continuous_at,
{ simp },
apply_instance },
have := h₁.add h₂,
rw asymptotics.is_o_const_iff one_ne at this,
change tendsto _ _ _,
convert this.add_const (f x),
{ ext e,
simp [h.map_sub_left, h.map_sub_right], },
{ simp }
end
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous_left (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {e₂ : F} :
continuous (λe₁, f (e₁, e₂)) :=
h.continuous.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous_right (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) {e₁ : E} :
continuous (λe₂, f (e₁, e₂)) :=
h.continuous.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_left (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (y : F) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ x, f (x, y)) :=
{ map_add := λ x x', h.add_left _ _ _,
map_smul := λ c x, h.smul_left _ _ _,
bound := begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, C_pos, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C * (∥y∥ + 1), mul_pos C_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_one) (by simp)), λ x, _⟩,
have : ∥y∥ ≤ ∥y∥ + 1, by simp [zero_le_one],
calc ∥f (x, y)∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ : hC x y
... ≤ C * ∥x∥ * (∥y∥ + 1) :
by apply_rules [norm_nonneg, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, le_of_lt C_pos, mul_nonneg]
... = C * (∥y∥ + 1) * ∥x∥ : by ring
end }
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_right
(h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (x : E) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ y, f (x, y)) :=
{ map_add := λ y y', h.add_right _ _ _,
map_smul := λ c y, h.smul_right _ _ _,
bound := begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, C_pos, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C * (∥x∥ + 1), mul_pos C_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_one) (by simp)), λ y, _⟩,
have : ∥x∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + 1, by simp [zero_le_one],
calc ∥f (x, y)∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ : hC x y
... ≤ C * (∥x∥ + 1) * ∥y∥ :
by apply_rules [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, norm_nonneg, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left,
le_of_lt C_pos]
end }
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul {𝕜' : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜']
[normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
[is_scalar_tower 𝕜 𝕜' E] :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (p : 𝕜' × E), p.1 • p.2) :=
{ add_left := add_smul,
smul_left := λ c x y, by simp [smul_assoc],
add_right := smul_add,
smul_right := λ c x y, by simp [smul_assoc, smul_algebra_smul_comm],
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ x y, by simp [norm_smul] ⟩ }
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_mul :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (p : 𝕜 × 𝕜), p.1 * p.2) :=
by simp_rw ← smul_eq_mul; exact is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (p : (E →L[𝕜] F) × (F →L[𝕜] G)), p.2.comp p.1) :=
{ add_left := λ x₁ x₂ y, begin
ext z,
change y (x₁ z + x₂ z) = y (x₁ z) + y (x₂ z),
rw y.map_add
end,
smul_left := λ c x y, begin
ext z,
change y (c • (x z)) = c • y (x z),
rw continuous_linear_map.map_smul
end,
add_right := λ x y₁ y₂, rfl,
smul_right := λ c x y, rfl,
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ x y, calc
∥continuous_linear_map.comp ((x, y).snd) ((x, y).fst)∥
≤ ∥y∥ * ∥x∥ : continuous_linear_map.op_norm_comp_le _ _
... = 1 * ∥x∥ * ∥ y∥ : by ring ⟩ }
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_comp_left (g : F →L[𝕜] G) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (f : E →L[𝕜] F), continuous_linear_map.comp g f) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.is_bounded_linear_map_left _
lemma continuous_linear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_comp_right (f : E →L[𝕜] F) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ (g : F →L[𝕜] G), continuous_linear_map.comp g f) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.is_bounded_linear_map_right _
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ p : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E, p.1 p.2) :=
{ add_left := by simp,
smul_left := by simp,
add_right := by simp,
smul_right := by simp,
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, by simp [continuous_linear_map.le_op_norm]⟩ }
/-- The function `continuous_linear_map.smul_right`, associating to a continuous linear map
`f : E → 𝕜` and a scalar `c : F` the tensor product `f ⊗ c` as a continuous linear map from `E` to
`F`, is a bounded bilinear map. -/
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul_right :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜
(λ p, (continuous_linear_map.smul_right : (E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) → F → (E →L[𝕜] F)) p.1 p.2) :=
{ add_left := λ m₁ m₂ f, by { ext z, simp [add_smul] },
smul_left := λ c m f, by { ext z, simp [mul_smul] },
add_right := λ m f₁ f₂, by { ext z, simp [smul_add] },
smul_right := λ c m f, by { ext z, simp [smul_smul, mul_comm] },
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ m f, by simp⟩ }
/-- The composition of a continuous linear map with a continuous multilinear map is a bounded
bilinear operation. -/
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp_multilinear {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*}
[decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] [∀ i, normed_group (E i)] [∀ i, normed_space 𝕜 (E i)] :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ p : (F →L[𝕜] G) × (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E F),
p.1.comp_continuous_multilinear_map p.2) :=
{ add_left := λ g₁ g₂ f, by { ext m, refl },
smul_left := λ c g f, by { ext m, refl },
add_right := λ g f₁ f₂, by { ext m, simp },
smul_right := λ c g f, by { ext m, simp },
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ g f, begin
apply continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ _ (λ m, _),
{ apply_rules [mul_nonneg, zero_le_one, norm_nonneg] },
calc ∥g (f m)∥ ≤ ∥g∥ * ∥f m∥ : g.le_op_norm _
... ≤ ∥g∥ * (∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (f.le_op_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = 1 * ∥g∥ * ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ : by ring
end⟩ }
/-- Definition of the derivative of a bilinear map `f`, given at a point `p` by
`q ↦ f(p.1, q.2) + f(q.1, p.2)` as in the standard formula for the derivative of a product.
We define this function here as a linear map `E × F →ₗ[𝕜] G`, then `is_bounded_bilinear_map.deriv`
strengthens it to a continuous linear map `E × F →L[𝕜] G`.
``. -/
def is_bounded_bilinear_map.linear_deriv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (p : E × F) :
E × F →ₗ[𝕜] G :=
{ to_fun := λ q, f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2),
map_add' := λ q₁ q₂, begin
change f (p.1, q₁.2 + q₂.2) + f (q₁.1 + q₂.1, p.2) =
f (p.1, q₁.2) + f (q₁.1, p.2) + (f (p.1, q₂.2) + f (q₂.1, p.2)),
simp [h.add_left, h.add_right], abel
end,
map_smul' := λ c q, begin
change f (p.1, c • q.2) + f (c • q.1, p.2) = c • (f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2)),
simp [h.smul_left, h.smul_right, smul_add]
end }
/-- The derivative of a bounded bilinear map at a point `p : E × F`, as a continuous linear map
from `E × F` to `G`. The statement that this is indeed the derivative of `f` is
`is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_at` in `analysis.calculus.fderiv`. -/
def is_bounded_bilinear_map.deriv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (p : E × F) : E × F →L[𝕜] G :=
(h.linear_deriv p).mk_continuous_of_exists_bound $ begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C * ∥p.1∥ + C * ∥p.2∥, λ q, _⟩,
calc ∥f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2)∥
≤ C * ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + C * ∥q.1∥ * ∥p.2∥ : norm_add_le_of_le (hC _ _) (hC _ _)
... ≤ C * ∥p.1∥ * ∥q∥ + C * ∥q∥ * ∥p.2∥ : begin
apply add_le_add,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(le_max_right _ _) (mul_nonneg (le_of_lt Cpos) (norm_nonneg _)),
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (norm_nonneg _),
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_left _ _) (le_of_lt Cpos),
end
... = (C * ∥p.1∥ + C * ∥p.2∥) * ∥q∥ : by ring
end
@[simp] lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_deriv_coe (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) (p q : E × F) :
h.deriv p q = f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2) := rfl
variables (𝕜)
/-- The function `lmul_left_right : 𝕜' × 𝕜' → (𝕜' →L[𝕜] 𝕜')` is a bounded bilinear map. -/
lemma continuous_linear_map.lmul_left_right_is_bounded_bilinear
(𝕜' : Type*) [normed_ring 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] :
is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ p : 𝕜' × 𝕜', continuous_linear_map.lmul_left_right 𝕜 𝕜' p.1 p.2) :=
(continuous_linear_map.lmul_left_right 𝕜 𝕜').is_bounded_bilinear_map
variables {𝕜}
/-- Given a bounded bilinear map `f`, the map associating to a point `p` the derivative of `f` at
`p` is itself a bounded linear map. -/
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.is_bounded_linear_map_deriv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 f) :
is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (λ p : E × F, h.deriv p) :=
begin
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, Cpos : 0 < C, hC⟩,
refine is_linear_map.with_bound ⟨λ p₁ p₂, _, λ c p, _⟩ (C + C) (λ p, _),
{ ext; simp [h.add_left, h.add_right]; abel },
{ ext; simp [h.smul_left, h.smul_right, smul_add] },
{ refine continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_bound _
(mul_nonneg (add_nonneg Cpos.le Cpos.le) (norm_nonneg _)) (λ q, _),
calc ∥f (p.1, q.2) + f (q.1, p.2)∥
≤ C * ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + C * ∥q.1∥ * ∥p.2∥ : norm_add_le_of_le (hC _ _) (hC _ _)
... ≤ C * ∥p∥ * ∥q∥ + C * ∥q∥ * ∥p∥ : by apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul, norm_nonneg,
Cpos.le, le_refl, le_max_left, le_max_right, mul_nonneg]
... = (C + C) * ∥p∥ * ∥q∥ : by ring },
end
end bilinear_map
/-- A linear isometry preserves the norm. -/
lemma linear_map.norm_apply_of_isometry (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) {x : E} (hf : isometry f) : ∥f x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
by { simp_rw [←dist_zero_right, ←f.map_zero], exact isometry.dist_eq hf _ _ }
/-- Construct a continuous linear equiv from
a linear map that is also an isometry with full range. -/
def continuous_linear_equiv.of_isometry (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (hf : isometry f) (hfr : f.range = ⊤) :
E ≃L[𝕜] F :=
continuous_linear_equiv.of_homothety
(linear_equiv.of_bijective f (isometry.injective hf) (linear_map.range_eq_top.mp hfr))
1 zero_lt_one (λ _, by simp [one_mul, f.norm_apply_of_isometry hf])
namespace continuous_linear_equiv
open set
/-!
### The set of continuous linear equivalences between two Banach spaces is open
In this section we establish that the set of continuous linear equivalences between two Banach
spaces is an open subset of the space of linear maps between them.
-/
protected lemma is_open [complete_space E] : is_open (range (coe : (E ≃L[𝕜] F) → (E →L[𝕜] F))) :=
begin
nontriviality E,
rw [is_open_iff_mem_nhds, forall_range_iff],
refine λ e, is_open.mem_nhds _ (mem_range_self _),
let O : (E →L[𝕜] F) → (E →L[𝕜] E) := λ f, (e.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f,
have h_O : continuous O := is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.continuous_left,
convert units.is_open.preimage h_O using 1,
ext f',
split,
{ rintros ⟨e', rfl⟩,
exact ⟨(e'.trans e.symm).to_unit, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨w, hw⟩,
use (units_equiv 𝕜 E w).trans e,
ext x,
simp [hw] }
end
protected lemma nhds [complete_space E] (e : E ≃L[𝕜] F) :
(range (coe : (E ≃L[𝕜] F) → (E →L[𝕜] F))) ∈ 𝓝 (e : E →L[𝕜] F) :=
is_open.mem_nhds continuous_linear_equiv.is_open (by simp)
end continuous_linear_equiv
|
a7ee846c526d2549284f6e2234cdb157730f3686 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/arrow.lean | 5b7d246712a6188933f220dd683a5ccc085dbe22 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 130 | lean | import Int.
print (Int -> Int) -> Int
print Int -> Int -> Int
print Int -> (Int -> Int)
print (Int -> Int) -> (Int -> Int) -> Int
|
821cb5bd8ed62850ac628d0b6f53541ac0ed1bad | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/implicitTypesRecCoe.lean | b24ad0cce69eca6de559efdd75720521f352c50e | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,215 | lean |
unsafe def f (n : Nat) :=
let rec g (x : Nat) :=
if x > 0 then
/- This example relies on the instance `coeId {α} (a : α) : CoeT α a α`,
The type of `g` is not provided. Thus, the expected type is
`?m x` since the elaborator assumes it may depend on `x`.
Thus, the expected type for the addition is `?m x`.
The type of `g (x-1)` is `?m (x-1)`. So, we have the unification
problem
```
?m (x-1) =?= ?m x
```
and it is rejected by the unifier. Thus, the elaborator inserts
a coercion from `?m (x-1)` to `?m x` around `g (x-1)` which creates
the pending TC problem:
```
CoeT (?m (x-1)) (g (x-1)) (?m x)
```
Remark: in principle, we could solve it using a heuristic: assume
`?m` is a constant function.
Later, when we elaborate the else branch `0`, we have that
```
?m x =?= Nat
```
which is solved using `?m := (fun _ => Nat)`.
Then, `@coeId Nat (g (x-1))` is used to synthesize
```
CoeT (?m (x-1)) (g (x-1)) (?m x)
```
which is
```
CoeT Nat (g (x-1)) Nat
```
after we apply the assignment `?m := (fun _ => Nat)`
-/
g (x-1) + n
else
0;
g n
#eval f 10
|
212018587dcf5435cbe59e382a99816086a398f3 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/polynomial/div.lean | 76cb1fda0b61071a5de73b4fb51068204eacaabf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,839 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.monic
import ring_theory.euclidean_domain
import ring_theory.multiplicity
/-!
# Division of univariate polynomials
The main defs are `div_by_monic` and `mod_by_monic`.
The compatibility between these is given by `mod_by_monic_add_div`.
We also define `root_multiplicity`.
-/
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 100] classical.prop_decidable
open finset
namespace polynomial
universes u v w z
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] {p q : polynomial R}
section
/--
The coercion turning a `polynomial` into the function which reports the coefficient of a given
monomial `X^n`
-/
-- TODO we would like to completely remove this, but this requires fixing some proofs
def coeff_coe_to_fun : has_coe_to_fun (polynomial R) :=
finsupp.has_coe_to_fun
local attribute [instance] coeff_coe_to_fun
lemma apply_eq_coeff : p n = coeff p n := rfl
end
/-- `div_X p` return a polynomial `q` such that `q * X + C (p.coeff 0) = p`.
It can be used in a semiring where the usual division algorithm is not possible -/
def div_X (p : polynomial R) : polynomial R :=
{ to_fun := λ n, p.coeff (n + 1),
support := ⟨(p.support.filter (> 0)).1.map (λ n, n - 1),
multiset.nodup_map_on begin
simp only [finset.mem_def.symm, finset.mem_erase, finset.mem_filter],
assume x hx y hy hxy,
rwa [← @add_right_cancel_iff _ _ 1, nat.sub_add_cancel hx.2,
nat.sub_add_cancel hy.2] at hxy
end
(p.support.filter (> 0)).2⟩,
mem_support_to_fun := λ n,
suffices (∃ (a : ℕ), (¬coeff p a = 0 ∧ a > 0) ∧ a - 1 = n) ↔
¬coeff p (n + 1) = 0,
by simpa [finset.mem_def.symm],
⟨λ ⟨a, ha⟩, by rw [← ha.2, nat.sub_add_cancel ha.1.2]; exact ha.1.1,
λ h, ⟨n + 1, ⟨h, nat.succ_pos _⟩, nat.succ_sub_one _⟩⟩ }
lemma div_X_mul_X_add (p : polynomial R) : div_X p * X + C (p.coeff 0) = p :=
ext $ λ n,
nat.cases_on n
(by simp)
(by simp [coeff_C, nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_mul_X, div_X])
@[simp] lemma div_X_C (a : R) : div_X (C a) = 0 :=
ext $ λ n, by cases n; simp [div_X, coeff_C]; simp [coeff]
lemma div_X_eq_zero_iff : div_X p = 0 ↔ p = C (p.coeff 0) :=
⟨λ h, by simpa [eq_comm, h] using div_X_mul_X_add p,
λ h, by rw [h, div_X_C]⟩
lemma div_X_add : div_X (p + q) = div_X p + div_X q :=
ext $ by simp [div_X]
lemma degree_div_X_lt (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (div_X p).degree < p.degree :=
by haveI := nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp0;
calc (div_X p).degree < (div_X p * X + C (p.coeff 0)).degree :
if h : degree p ≤ 0
then begin
have h' : C (p.coeff 0) ≠ 0, by rwa [← eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h],
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h, div_X_C, degree_zero, zero_mul, zero_add],
exact lt_of_le_of_ne bot_le (ne.symm (mt degree_eq_bot.1 $
by simp [h'])),
end
else
have hXp0 : div_X p ≠ 0,
by simpa [div_X_eq_zero_iff, -not_le, degree_le_zero_iff] using h,
have leading_coeff (div_X p) * leading_coeff X ≠ 0, by simpa,
have degree (C (p.coeff 0)) < degree (div_X p * X),
from calc degree (C (p.coeff 0)) ≤ 0 : degree_C_le
... < 1 : dec_trivial
... = degree (X : polynomial R) : degree_X.symm
... ≤ degree (div_X p * X) :
by rw [← zero_add (degree X), degree_mul' this];
exact add_le_add
(by rw [zero_le_degree_iff, ne.def, div_X_eq_zero_iff];
exact λ h0, h (h0.symm ▸ degree_C_le))
(le_refl _),
by rw [add_comm, degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt this];
exact degree_lt_degree_mul_X hXp0
... = p.degree : by rw div_X_mul_X_add
/-- An induction principle for polynomials, valued in Sort* instead of Prop. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] noncomputable def rec_on_horner
{M : polynomial R → Sort*} : Π (p : polynomial R),
M 0 →
(Π p a, coeff p 0 = 0 → a ≠ 0 → M p → M (p + C a)) →
(Π p, p ≠ 0 → M p → M (p * X)) →
M p
| p := λ M0 MC MX,
if hp : p = 0 then eq.rec_on hp.symm M0
else
have wf : degree (div_X p) < degree p,
from degree_div_X_lt hp,
by rw [← div_X_mul_X_add p] at *;
exact
if hcp0 : coeff p 0 = 0
then by rw [hcp0, C_0, add_zero];
exact MX _ (λ h : div_X p = 0, by simpa [h, hcp0] using hp)
(rec_on_horner _ M0 MC MX)
else MC _ _ (coeff_mul_X_zero _) hcp0 (if hpX0 : div_X p = 0
then show M (div_X p * X), by rw [hpX0, zero_mul]; exact M0
else MX (div_X p) hpX0 (rec_on_horner _ M0 MC MX))
using_well_founded {dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma degree_pos_induction_on
{P : polynomial R → Prop} (p : polynomial R) (h0 : 0 < degree p)
(hC : ∀ {a}, a ≠ 0 → P (C a * X))
(hX : ∀ {p}, 0 < degree p → P p → P (p * X))
(hadd : ∀ {p} {a}, 0 < degree p → P p → P (p + C a)) : P p :=
rec_on_horner p
(λ h, by rw degree_zero at h; exact absurd h dec_trivial)
(λ p a _ _ ih h0,
have 0 < degree p,
from lt_of_not_ge (λ h, (not_lt_of_ge degree_C_le) $
by rwa [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h, ← C_add] at h0),
hadd this (ih this))
(λ p _ ih h0',
if h0 : 0 < degree p
then hX h0 (ih h0)
else by rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (le_of_not_gt h0)] at *;
exact hC (λ h : coeff p 0 = 0,
by simpa [h, nat.not_lt_zero] using h0'))
h0
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R]
theorem X_dvd_iff {α : Type u} [comm_semiring α] {f : polynomial α} : X ∣ f ↔ f.coeff 0 = 0 :=
⟨λ ⟨g, hfg⟩, by rw [hfg, mul_comm, coeff_mul_X_zero],
λ hf, ⟨f.div_X, by rw [mul_comm, ← add_zero (f.div_X * X), ← C_0, ← hf, div_X_mul_X_add]⟩⟩
end comm_semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] {p q : polynomial R}
lemma multiplicity_finite_of_degree_pos_of_monic (hp : (0 : with_bot ℕ) < degree p)
(hmp : monic p) (hq : q ≠ 0) : multiplicity.finite p q :=
have zn0 : (0 : R) ≠ 1, from λ h, by haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h;
exact hq (subsingleton.elim _ _),
⟨nat_degree q, λ ⟨r, hr⟩,
have hp0 : p ≠ 0, from λ hp0, by simp [hp0] at hp; contradiction,
have hr0 : r ≠ 0, from λ hr0, by simp * at *,
have hpn1 : leading_coeff p ^ (nat_degree q + 1) = 1,
by simp [show _ = _, from hmp],
have hpn0' : leading_coeff p ^ (nat_degree q + 1) ≠ 0,
from hpn1.symm ▸ zn0.symm,
have hpnr0 : leading_coeff (p ^ (nat_degree q + 1)) * leading_coeff r ≠ 0,
by simp only [leading_coeff_pow' hpn0', leading_coeff_eq_zero, hpn1,
one_pow, one_mul, ne.def, hr0]; simp,
have hpn0 : p ^ (nat_degree q + 1) ≠ 0,
from mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.2 $
by rw [leading_coeff_pow' hpn0', show _ = _, from hmp, one_pow]; exact zn0.symm,
have hnp : 0 < nat_degree p,
by rw [← with_bot.coe_lt_coe, ← degree_eq_nat_degree hp0];
exact hp,
begin
have := congr_arg nat_degree hr,
rw [nat_degree_mul' hpnr0, nat_degree_pow' hpn0', add_mul, add_assoc] at this,
exact ne_of_lt (lt_add_of_le_of_pos (le_mul_of_one_le_right (nat.zero_le _) hnp)
(add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (by rwa one_mul) (nat.zero_le _))) this
end⟩
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] {p q : polynomial R}
lemma div_wf_lemma (h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0) (hq : monic q) :
degree (p - C (leading_coeff p) * X ^ (nat_degree p - nat_degree q) * q) < degree p :=
have hp : leading_coeff p ≠ 0 := mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 h.2,
have hpq : leading_coeff (C (leading_coeff p) * X ^ (nat_degree p - nat_degree q)) *
leading_coeff q ≠ 0,
by rwa [leading_coeff_monomial, monic.def.1 hq, mul_one],
if h0 : p - C (leading_coeff p) * X ^ (nat_degree p - nat_degree q) * q = 0
then h0.symm ▸ (lt_of_not_ge $ mt le_bot_iff.1 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 h.2))
else
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := hq.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne h.2,
have hlt : nat_degree q ≤ nat_degree p := with_bot.coe_le_coe.1
(by rw [← degree_eq_nat_degree h.2, ← degree_eq_nat_degree hq0];
exact h.1),
degree_sub_lt
(by rw [degree_mul' hpq, degree_C_mul_X_pow _ hp, degree_eq_nat_degree h.2,
degree_eq_nat_degree hq0, ← with_bot.coe_add, nat.sub_add_cancel hlt])
h.2
(by rw [leading_coeff_mul' hpq, leading_coeff_monomial, monic.def.1 hq, mul_one])
/-- See `div_by_monic`. -/
noncomputable def div_mod_by_monic_aux : Π (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R},
monic q → polynomial R × polynomial R
| p := λ q hq, if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then
let z := C (leading_coeff p) * X^(nat_degree p - nat_degree q) in
have wf : _ := div_wf_lemma h hq,
let dm := div_mod_by_monic_aux (p - z * q) hq in
⟨z + dm.1, dm.2⟩
else ⟨0, p⟩
using_well_founded {dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
/-- `div_by_monic` gives the quotient of `p` by a monic polynomial `q`. -/
def div_by_monic (p q : polynomial R) : polynomial R :=
if hq : monic q then (div_mod_by_monic_aux p hq).1 else 0
/-- `mod_by_monic` gives the remainder of `p` by a monic polynomial `q`. -/
def mod_by_monic (p q : polynomial R) : polynomial R :=
if hq : monic q then (div_mod_by_monic_aux p hq).2 else p
infixl ` /ₘ ` : 70 := div_by_monic
infixl ` %ₘ ` : 70 := mod_by_monic
lemma degree_mod_by_monic_lt : ∀ (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R} (hq : monic q)
(hq0 : q ≠ 0), degree (p %ₘ q) < degree q
| p := λ q hq hq0,
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then
have wf : _ := div_wf_lemma ⟨h.1, h.2⟩ hq,
have degree ((p - C (leading_coeff p) * X ^ (nat_degree p - nat_degree q) * q) %ₘ q) < degree q :=
degree_mod_by_monic_lt (p - C (leading_coeff p) * X ^ (nat_degree p - nat_degree q) * q)
hq hq0,
begin
unfold mod_by_monic at this ⊢,
unfold div_mod_by_monic_aux,
rw dif_pos hq at this ⊢,
rw if_pos h,
exact this
end
else
or.cases_on (not_and_distrib.1 h) begin
unfold mod_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux,
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h],
exact lt_of_not_ge,
end
begin
assume hp,
unfold mod_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux,
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h, not_not.1 hp],
exact lt_of_le_of_ne bot_le
(ne.symm (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hq0)),
end
using_well_founded {dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
@[simp] lemma zero_mod_by_monic (p : polynomial R) : 0 %ₘ p = 0 :=
begin
unfold mod_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux,
by_cases hp : monic p,
{ rw [dif_pos hp, if_neg (mt and.right (not_not_intro rfl))] },
{ rw [dif_neg hp] }
end
@[simp] lemma zero_div_by_monic (p : polynomial R) : 0 /ₘ p = 0 :=
begin
unfold div_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux,
by_cases hp : monic p,
{ rw [dif_pos hp, if_neg (mt and.right (not_not_intro rfl))] },
{ rw [dif_neg hp] }
end
@[simp] lemma mod_by_monic_zero (p : polynomial R) : p %ₘ 0 = p :=
if h : monic (0 : polynomial R) then (subsingleton_of_monic_zero h).1 _ _ else
by unfold mod_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux; rw dif_neg h
@[simp] lemma div_by_monic_zero (p : polynomial R) : p /ₘ 0 = 0 :=
if h : monic (0 : polynomial R) then (subsingleton_of_monic_zero h).1 _ _ else
by unfold div_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux; rw dif_neg h
lemma div_by_monic_eq_of_not_monic (p : polynomial R) (hq : ¬monic q) : p /ₘ q = 0 := dif_neg hq
lemma mod_by_monic_eq_of_not_monic (p : polynomial R) (hq : ¬monic q) : p %ₘ q = p := dif_neg hq
lemma mod_by_monic_eq_self_iff (hq : monic q) (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p %ₘ q = p ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨λ h, h ▸ degree_mod_by_monic_lt _ hq hq0,
λ h, have ¬ degree q ≤ degree p := not_le_of_gt h,
by unfold mod_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux; rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg (mt and.left this)]⟩
theorem degree_mod_by_monic_le (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R}
(hq : monic q) : degree (p %ₘ q) ≤ degree q :=
decidable.by_cases
(assume H : q = 0, by rw [monic, H, leading_coeff_zero] at hq;
have : (0:polynomial R) = 1 := (by rw [← C_0, ← C_1, hq]);
exact le_of_eq (congr_arg _ $ eq_of_zero_eq_one this (p %ₘ q) q))
(assume H : q ≠ 0, le_of_lt $ degree_mod_by_monic_lt _ hq H)
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] {p q : polynomial R}
lemma mod_by_monic_eq_sub_mul_div : ∀ (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R} (hq : monic q),
p %ₘ q = p - q * (p /ₘ q)
| p := λ q hq,
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then
have wf : _ := div_wf_lemma h hq,
have ih : _ := mod_by_monic_eq_sub_mul_div
(p - C (leading_coeff p) * X ^ (nat_degree p - nat_degree q) * q) hq,
begin
unfold mod_by_monic div_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux,
rw [dif_pos hq, if_pos h],
rw [mod_by_monic, dif_pos hq] at ih,
refine ih.trans _,
unfold div_by_monic,
rw [dif_pos hq, dif_pos hq, if_pos h, mul_add, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, mul_comm]
end
else
begin
unfold mod_by_monic div_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux,
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h, dif_pos hq, if_neg h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
end
using_well_founded {dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
lemma mod_by_monic_add_div (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R} (hq : monic q) :
p %ₘ q + q * (p /ₘ q) = p := eq_sub_iff_add_eq.1 (mod_by_monic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq)
lemma div_by_monic_eq_zero_iff (hq : monic q) (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p /ₘ q = 0 ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨λ h, by have := mod_by_monic_add_div p hq;
rwa [h, mul_zero, add_zero, mod_by_monic_eq_self_iff hq hq0] at this,
λ h, have ¬ degree q ≤ degree p := not_le_of_gt h,
by unfold div_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux; rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg (mt and.left this)]⟩
lemma degree_add_div_by_monic (hq : monic q) (h : degree q ≤ degree p) :
degree q + degree (p /ₘ q) = degree p :=
if hq0 : q = 0 then
have ∀ (p : polynomial R), p = 0,
from λ p, (@subsingleton_of_monic_zero R _ (hq0 ▸ hq)).1 _ _,
by rw [this (p /ₘ q), this p, this q]; refl
else
have hdiv0 : p /ₘ q ≠ 0 := by rwa [(≠), div_by_monic_eq_zero_iff hq hq0, not_lt],
have hlc : leading_coeff q * leading_coeff (p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 :=
by rwa [monic.def.1 hq, one_mul, (≠), leading_coeff_eq_zero],
have hmod : degree (p %ₘ q) < degree (q * (p /ₘ q)) :=
calc degree (p %ₘ q) < degree q : degree_mod_by_monic_lt _ hq hq0
... ≤ _ : by rw [degree_mul' hlc, degree_eq_nat_degree hq0,
degree_eq_nat_degree hdiv0, ← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_le_coe];
exact nat.le_add_right _ _,
calc degree q + degree (p /ₘ q) = degree (q * (p /ₘ q)) : eq.symm (degree_mul' hlc)
... = degree (p %ₘ q + q * (p /ₘ q)) : (degree_add_eq_of_degree_lt hmod).symm
... = _ : congr_arg _ (mod_by_monic_add_div _ hq)
lemma degree_div_by_monic_le (p q : polynomial R) : degree (p /ₘ q) ≤ degree p :=
if hp0 : p = 0 then by simp only [hp0, zero_div_by_monic, le_refl]
else if hq : monic q then
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := hq.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne hp0,
if h : degree q ≤ degree p
then by rw [← degree_add_div_by_monic hq h, degree_eq_nat_degree hq0,
degree_eq_nat_degree (mt (div_by_monic_eq_zero_iff hq hq0).1 (not_lt.2 h))];
exact with_bot.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_add_left _ _)
else
by unfold div_by_monic div_mod_by_monic_aux;
simp only [dif_pos hq, h, false_and, if_false, degree_zero, bot_le]
else (div_by_monic_eq_of_not_monic p hq).symm ▸ bot_le
lemma degree_div_by_monic_lt (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R} (hq : monic q)
(hp0 : p ≠ 0) (h0q : 0 < degree q) : degree (p /ₘ q) < degree p :=
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := hq.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne hp0,
if hpq : degree p < degree q
then begin
rw [(div_by_monic_eq_zero_iff hq hq0).2 hpq, degree_eq_nat_degree hp0],
exact with_bot.bot_lt_some _
end
else begin
rw [← degree_add_div_by_monic hq (not_lt.1 hpq), degree_eq_nat_degree hq0,
degree_eq_nat_degree (mt (div_by_monic_eq_zero_iff hq hq0).1 hpq)],
exact with_bot.coe_lt_coe.2 (nat.lt_add_of_pos_left
(with_bot.coe_lt_coe.1 $ (degree_eq_nat_degree hq0) ▸ h0q))
end
theorem nat_degree_div_by_monic {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] (f : polynomial R) {g : polynomial R}
(hg : g.monic) : nat_degree (f /ₘ g) = nat_degree f - nat_degree g :=
begin
by_cases h01 : (0 : R) = 1,
{ haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h01,
rw [subsingleton.elim (f /ₘ g) 0, subsingleton.elim f 0, subsingleton.elim g 0,
nat_degree_zero] },
haveI : nontrivial R := ⟨⟨0, 1, h01⟩⟩,
by_cases hfg : f /ₘ g = 0,
{ rw [hfg, nat_degree_zero], rw div_by_monic_eq_zero_iff hg hg.ne_zero at hfg,
rw nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (nat_degree_le_nat_degree $ le_of_lt hfg) },
have hgf := hfg, rw div_by_monic_eq_zero_iff hg hg.ne_zero at hgf, push_neg at hgf,
have := degree_add_div_by_monic hg hgf,
have hf : f ≠ 0, { intro hf, apply hfg, rw [hf, zero_div_by_monic] },
rw [degree_eq_nat_degree hf, degree_eq_nat_degree hg.ne_zero, degree_eq_nat_degree hfg,
← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_eq_coe] at this,
rw [← this, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
end
lemma div_mod_by_monic_unique {f g} (q r : polynomial R) (hg : monic g)
(h : r + g * q = f ∧ degree r < degree g) : f /ₘ g = q ∧ f %ₘ g = r :=
if hg0 : g = 0 then by split; exact (subsingleton_of_monic_zero
(hg0 ▸ hg : monic (0 : polynomial R))).1 _ _
else
have h₁ : r - f %ₘ g = -g * (q - f /ₘ g),
from eq_of_sub_eq_zero
(by rw [← sub_eq_zero_of_eq (h.1.trans (mod_by_monic_add_div f hg).symm)];
simp [mul_add, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]),
have h₂ : degree (r - f %ₘ g) = degree (g * (q - f /ₘ g)),
by simp [h₁],
have h₄ : degree (r - f %ₘ g) < degree g,
from calc degree (r - f %ₘ g) ≤ max (degree r) (degree (-(f %ₘ g))) :
degree_add_le _ _
... < degree g : max_lt_iff.2 ⟨h.2, by rw degree_neg; exact degree_mod_by_monic_lt _ hg hg0⟩,
have h₅ : q - (f /ₘ g) = 0,
from by_contradiction
(λ hqf, not_le_of_gt h₄ $
calc degree g ≤ degree g + degree (q - f /ₘ g) :
by erw [degree_eq_nat_degree hg0, degree_eq_nat_degree hqf,
with_bot.coe_le_coe];
exact nat.le_add_right _ _
... = degree (r - f %ₘ g) :
by rw [h₂, degree_mul']; simpa [monic.def.1 hg]),
⟨eq.symm $ eq_of_sub_eq_zero h₅,
eq.symm $ eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ by simpa [h₅] using h₁⟩
lemma map_mod_div_by_monic [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : monic q) :
(p /ₘ q).map f = p.map f /ₘ q.map f ∧ (p %ₘ q).map f = p.map f %ₘ q.map f :=
if h01 : (0 : S) = 1 then by haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h01;
exact ⟨subsingleton.elim _ _, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
else
have h01R : (0 : R) ≠ 1, from mt (congr_arg f)
(by rwa [f.map_one, f.map_zero]),
have map f p /ₘ map f q = map f (p /ₘ q) ∧ map f p %ₘ map f q = map f (p %ₘ q),
from (div_mod_by_monic_unique ((p /ₘ q).map f) _ (monic_map f hq)
⟨eq.symm $ by rw [← map_mul, ← map_add, mod_by_monic_add_div _ hq],
calc _ ≤ degree (p %ₘ q) : degree_map_le _
... < degree q : degree_mod_by_monic_lt _ hq
$ (hq.ne_zero_of_ne h01R)
... = _ : eq.symm $ degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [monic.def.1 hq, f.map_one]; exact ne.symm h01)⟩),
⟨this.1.symm, this.2.symm⟩
lemma map_div_by_monic [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : monic q) :
(p /ₘ q).map f = p.map f /ₘ q.map f :=
(map_mod_div_by_monic f hq).1
lemma map_mod_by_monic [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : monic q) :
(p %ₘ q).map f = p.map f %ₘ q.map f :=
(map_mod_div_by_monic f hq).2
lemma dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero (hq : monic q) : p %ₘ q = 0 ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← mod_by_monic_add_div p hq, h, zero_add];
exact dvd_mul_right _ _,
λ h, if hq0 : q = 0 then by rw hq0 at hq;
exact (subsingleton_of_monic_zero hq).1 _ _
else
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd h in
by_contradiction (λ hpq0,
have hmod : p %ₘ q = q * (r - p /ₘ q) :=
by rw [mod_by_monic_eq_sub_mul_div _ hq, mul_sub, ← hr],
have degree (q * (r - p /ₘ q)) < degree q :=
hmod ▸ degree_mod_by_monic_lt _ hq hq0,
have hrpq0 : leading_coeff (r - p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 :=
λ h, hpq0 $ leading_coeff_eq_zero.1
(by rw [hmod, leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 h, mul_zero, leading_coeff_zero]),
have hlc : leading_coeff q * leading_coeff (r - p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 :=
by rwa [monic.def.1 hq, one_mul],
by rw [degree_mul' hlc, degree_eq_nat_degree hq0,
degree_eq_nat_degree (mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.2 hrpq0)] at this;
exact not_lt_of_ge (nat.le_add_right _ _) (with_bot.some_lt_some.1 this))⟩
theorem map_dvd_map [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hf : function.injective f) {x y : polynomial R}
(hx : x.monic) : x.map f ∣ y.map f ↔ x ∣ y :=
begin
rw [← dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero hx, ← dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero (monic_map f hx),
← map_mod_by_monic f hx],
exact ⟨λ H, map_injective f hf $ by rw [H, map_zero],
λ H, by rw [H, map_zero]⟩
end
@[simp] lemma mod_by_monic_one (p : polynomial R) : p %ₘ 1 = 0 :=
(dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero (by convert monic_one)).2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp] lemma div_by_monic_one (p : polynomial R) : p /ₘ 1 = p :=
by conv_rhs { rw [← mod_by_monic_add_div p monic_one] }; simp
@[simp] lemma mod_by_monic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval (p : polynomial R) (a : R) :
p %ₘ (X - C a) = C (p.eval a) :=
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then by letI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0; exact subsingleton.elim _ _
else
by haveI : nontrivial R := nontrivial_of_ne 0 1 h0; exact
have h : (p %ₘ (X - C a)).eval a = p.eval a :=
by rw [mod_by_monic_eq_sub_mul_div _ (monic_X_sub_C a), eval_sub, eval_mul,
eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self, zero_mul, sub_zero],
have degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) < 1 :=
degree_X_sub_C a ▸ degree_mod_by_monic_lt p (monic_X_sub_C a) ((degree_X_sub_C a).symm ▸
ne_zero_of_monic (monic_X_sub_C _)),
have degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) ≤ 0 :=
begin
cases (degree (p %ₘ (X - C a))),
{ exact bot_le },
{ exact with_bot.some_le_some.2 (nat.le_of_lt_succ (with_bot.some_lt_some.1 this)) }
end,
begin
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, eval_C] at h,
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, h]
end
lemma mul_div_by_monic_eq_iff_is_root : (X - C a) * (p /ₘ (X - C a)) = p ↔ is_root p a :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← h, is_root.def, eval_mul, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self, zero_mul],
λ h : p.eval a = 0,
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← mod_by_monic_add_div p (monic_X_sub_C a)};
rw [mod_by_monic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval, h, C_0, zero_add]⟩
lemma dvd_iff_is_root : (X - C a) ∣ p ↔ is_root p a :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero (monic_X_sub_C _),
mod_by_monic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval, ← C_0, C_inj] at h,
λ h, ⟨(p /ₘ (X - C a)), by rw mul_div_by_monic_eq_iff_is_root.2 h⟩⟩
lemma mod_by_monic_X (p : polynomial R) : p %ₘ X = C (p.eval 0) :=
by rw [← mod_by_monic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval, C_0, sub_zero]
section multiplicity
/-- An algorithm for deciding polynomial divisibility.
The algorithm is "compute `p %ₘ q` and compare to `0`". `
See `polynomial.mod_by_monic` for the algorithm that computes `%ₘ`.
-/
def decidable_dvd_monic (p : polynomial R) (hq : monic q) : decidable (q ∣ p) :=
decidable_of_iff (p %ₘ q = 0) (dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero hq)
open_locale classical
lemma multiplicity_X_sub_C_finite (a : R) (h0 : p ≠ 0) :
multiplicity.finite (X - C a) p :=
multiplicity_finite_of_degree_pos_of_monic
(have (0 : R) ≠ 1, from (λ h, by haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h;
exact h0 (subsingleton.elim _ _)),
by haveI : nontrivial R := ⟨⟨0, 1, this⟩⟩; rw degree_X_sub_C; exact dec_trivial)
(monic_X_sub_C _) h0
/-- The largest power of `X - C a` which divides `p`.
This is computable via the divisibility algorithm `decidable_dvd_monic`. -/
def root_multiplicity (a : R) (p : polynomial R) : ℕ :=
if h0 : p = 0 then 0
else let I : decidable_pred (λ n : ℕ, ¬(X - C a) ^ (n + 1) ∣ p) :=
λ n, @not.decidable _ (decidable_dvd_monic p (monic_pow (monic_X_sub_C a) (n + 1))) in
by exactI nat.find (multiplicity_X_sub_C_finite a h0)
lemma root_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity (p : polynomial R) (a : R) :
root_multiplicity a p = if h0 : p = 0 then 0 else
(multiplicity (X - C a) p).get (multiplicity_X_sub_C_finite a h0) :=
by simp [multiplicity, root_multiplicity, roption.dom];
congr; funext; congr
lemma pow_root_multiplicity_dvd (p : polynomial R) (a : R) :
(X - C a) ^ root_multiplicity a p ∣ p :=
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else by rw [root_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity, dif_neg h];
exact multiplicity.pow_multiplicity_dvd _
lemma div_by_monic_mul_pow_root_multiplicity_eq
(p : polynomial R) (a : R) :
p /ₘ ((X - C a) ^ root_multiplicity a p) *
(X - C a) ^ root_multiplicity a p = p :=
have monic ((X - C a) ^ root_multiplicity a p),
from monic_pow (monic_X_sub_C _) _,
by conv_rhs { rw [← mod_by_monic_add_div p this,
(dvd_iff_mod_by_monic_eq_zero this).2 (pow_root_multiplicity_dvd _ _)] };
simp [mul_comm]
lemma eval_div_by_monic_pow_root_multiplicity_ne_zero
{p : polynomial R} (a : R) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
eval a (p /ₘ ((X - C a) ^ root_multiplicity a p)) ≠ 0 :=
begin
haveI : nontrivial R := nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp,
rw [ne.def, ← is_root.def, ← dvd_iff_is_root],
rintros ⟨q, hq⟩,
have := div_by_monic_mul_pow_root_multiplicity_eq p a,
rw [mul_comm, hq, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ',
root_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity, dif_neg hp] at this,
exact multiplicity.is_greatest'
(multiplicity_finite_of_degree_pos_of_monic
(show (0 : with_bot ℕ) < degree (X - C a),
by rw degree_X_sub_C; exact dec_trivial) (monic_X_sub_C _) hp)
(nat.lt_succ_self _) (dvd_of_mul_right_eq _ this)
end
end multiplicity
end comm_ring
end polynomial
|
2daa256990bed640032ab693fcf1e0c8fc521268 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/star/pointwise.lean | 4885c23b117cb9d45397c4babcf2019b703c0869 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,381 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import algebra.star.basic
import data.set.finite
import data.set.pointwise.basic
/-!
# Pointwise star operation on sets
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines the star operation pointwise on sets and provides the basic API.
Besides basic facts about about how the star operation acts on sets (e.g., `(s ∩ t)⋆ = s⋆ ∩ t⋆`),
if `s t : set α`, then under suitable assumption on `α`, it is shown
* `(s + t)⋆ = s⋆ + t⋆`
* `(s * t)⋆ = t⋆ + s⋆`
* `(s⁻¹)⋆ = (s⋆)⁻¹`
-/
namespace set
open_locale pointwise
local postfix `⋆`:std.prec.max_plus := star
variables {α : Type*} {s t : set α} {a : α}
/-- The set `(star s : set α)` is defined as `{x | star x ∈ s}` in locale `pointwise`.
In the usual case where `star` is involutive, it is equal to `{star s | x ∈ s}`, see
`set.image_star`. -/
protected def has_star [has_star α] : has_star (set α) :=
⟨preimage has_star.star⟩
localized "attribute [instance] set.has_star" in pointwise
@[simp]
lemma star_empty [has_star α] : (∅ : set α)⋆ = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma star_univ [has_star α] : (univ : set α)⋆ = univ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_star [has_involutive_star α] {s : set α} : (s⋆).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
star_involutive.surjective.nonempty_preimage
lemma nonempty.star [has_involutive_star α] {s : set α} (h : s.nonempty) :
(s⋆).nonempty :=
nonempty_star.2 h
@[simp]
lemma mem_star [has_star α] : a ∈ s⋆ ↔ a⋆ ∈ s := iff.rfl
lemma star_mem_star [has_involutive_star α] : a⋆ ∈ s⋆ ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp only [mem_star, star_star]
@[simp]
lemma star_preimage [has_star α] : has_star.star ⁻¹' s = s⋆ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma image_star [has_involutive_star α] : has_star.star '' s = s⋆ :=
by { simp only [← star_preimage], rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse]; intro; simp only [star_star] }
@[simp]
lemma inter_star [has_star α] : (s ∩ t)⋆ = s⋆ ∩ t⋆ := preimage_inter
@[simp]
lemma union_star [has_star α] : (s ∪ t)⋆ = s⋆ ∪ t⋆ := preimage_union
@[simp]
lemma Inter_star {ι : Sort*} [has_star α] (s : ι → set α) : (⋂ i, s i)⋆ = ⋂ i, (s i)⋆ :=
preimage_Inter
@[simp]
lemma Union_star {ι : Sort*} [has_star α] (s : ι → set α) : (⋃ i, s i)⋆ = ⋃ i, (s i)⋆ :=
preimage_Union
@[simp]
lemma compl_star [has_star α] : (sᶜ)⋆ = (s⋆)ᶜ := preimage_compl
@[simp]
instance [has_involutive_star α] : has_involutive_star (set α) :=
{ star := has_star.star,
star_involutive :=
λ s, by { simp only [← star_preimage, preimage_preimage, star_star, preimage_id'] } }
@[simp]
lemma star_subset_star [has_involutive_star α] {s t : set α} : s⋆ ⊆ t⋆ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
equiv.star.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
lemma star_subset [has_involutive_star α] {s t : set α} : s⋆ ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t⋆ :=
by { rw [← star_subset_star, star_star] }
lemma finite.star [has_involutive_star α] {s : set α} (hs : s.finite) : s⋆.finite :=
hs.preimage $ star_injective.inj_on _
lemma star_singleton {β : Type*} [has_involutive_star β] (x : β) : ({x} : set β)⋆ = {x⋆} :=
by { ext1 y, rw [mem_star, mem_singleton_iff, mem_singleton_iff, star_eq_iff_star_eq, eq_comm], }
protected lemma star_mul [monoid α] [star_semigroup α] (s t : set α) :
(s * t)⋆ = t⋆ * s⋆ :=
by simp_rw [←image_star, ←image2_mul, image_image2, image2_image_left, image2_image_right,
star_mul, image2_swap _ s t]
protected lemma star_add [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] (s t : set α) :
(s + t)⋆ = s⋆ + t⋆ :=
by simp_rw [←image_star, ←image2_add, image_image2, image2_image_left, image2_image_right, star_add]
@[simp]
instance [has_star α] [has_trivial_star α] : has_trivial_star (set α) :=
{ star_trivial := λ s, by { rw [←star_preimage], ext1, simp [star_trivial] } }
protected lemma star_inv [group α] [star_semigroup α] (s : set α) : (s⁻¹)⋆ = (s⋆)⁻¹ :=
by { ext, simp only [mem_star, mem_inv, star_inv] }
protected lemma star_inv' [division_semiring α] [star_ring α] (s : set α) : (s⁻¹)⋆ = (s⋆)⁻¹ :=
by { ext, simp only [mem_star, mem_inv, star_inv'] }
end set
|
3a856ad7f5785e13640948def52b93010dc72fa6 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/finset/prod.lean | 9bca2f43adcf705812e4653b9cf2e3d9c15ab4f1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,988 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Oliver Nash
-/
import data.finset.card
/-!
# Finsets in product types
This file defines finset constructions on the product type `α × β`. Beware not to confuse with the
`finset.prod` operation which computes the multiplicative product.
## Main declarations
* `finset.product`: Turns `s : finset α`, `t : finset β` into their product in `finset (α × β)`.
* `finset.diag`: For `s : finset α`, `s.diag` is the `finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, a)` with
`a ∈ s`.
* `finset.off_diag`: For `s : finset α`, `s.off_diag` is the `finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, b)` with
`a, b ∈ s` and `a ≠ b`.
-/
open multiset
variables {α β γ : Type*}
namespace finset
/-! ### prod -/
section prod
variables {s s' : finset α} {t t' : finset β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- `product s t` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) : finset (α × β) := ⟨_, s.nodup.product t.nodup⟩
/- This notation binds more strongly than (pre)images, unions and intersections. -/
infixr (name := finset.product) ` ×ˢ `:82 := finset.product
@[simp] lemma product_val : (s ×ˢ t).1 = s.1 ×ˢ t.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_product {p : α × β} : p ∈ s ×ˢ t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t := mem_product
lemma mk_mem_product (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : (a, b) ∈ s ×ˢ t := mem_product.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) :
(↑(s ×ˢ t) : set (α × β)) = s ×ˢ t :=
set.ext $ λ x, finset.mem_product
lemma subset_product_image_fst [decidable_eq α] : (s ×ˢ t).image prod.fst ⊆ s :=
λ i, by simp [mem_image] {contextual := tt}
lemma subset_product_image_snd [decidable_eq β] : (s ×ˢ t).image prod.snd ⊆ t :=
λ i, by simp [mem_image] {contextual := tt}
lemma product_image_fst [decidable_eq α] (ht : t.nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image prod.fst = s :=
by { ext i, simp [mem_image, ht.bex] }
lemma product_image_snd [decidable_eq β] (ht : s.nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image prod.snd = t :=
by { ext i, simp [mem_image, ht.bex] }
lemma subset_product [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {s : finset (α × β)} :
s ⊆ s.image prod.fst ×ˢ s.image prod.snd :=
λ p hp, mem_product.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
lemma product_subset_product (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t' :=
λ ⟨x,y⟩ h, mem_product.2 ⟨hs (mem_product.1 h).1, ht (mem_product.1 h).2⟩
lemma product_subset_product_left (hs : s ⊆ s') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t :=
product_subset_product hs (subset.refl _)
lemma product_subset_product_right (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s ×ˢ t' :=
product_subset_product (subset.refl _) ht
lemma map_swap_product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).map ⟨prod.swap, prod.swap_injective⟩ = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective $ by { push_cast, exact set.image_swap_prod _ _ }
@[simp] lemma image_swap_product [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (s : finset α) (t : finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).image prod.swap = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective $ by { push_cast, exact set.image_swap_prod _ _ }
lemma product_eq_bUnion [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (s : finset α) (t : finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = s.bUnion (λa, t.image $ λb, (a, b)) :=
ext $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp only [mem_product, mem_bUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, prod.mk.inj_iff,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
lemma product_eq_bUnion_right [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (s : finset α) (t : finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = t.bUnion (λ b, s.image $ λ a, (a, b)) :=
ext $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp only [mem_product, mem_bUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, prod.mk.inj_iff,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
/-- See also `finset.sup_product_left`. -/
@[simp] lemma product_bUnion [decidable_eq γ] (s : finset α) (t : finset β) (f : α × β → finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).bUnion f = s.bUnion (λ a, t.bUnion (λ b, f (a, b))) :=
by { classical, simp_rw [product_eq_bUnion, bUnion_bUnion, image_bUnion] }
@[simp] lemma card_product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) : card (s ×ˢ t) = card s * card t :=
multiset.card_product _ _
lemma filter_product (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q] :
(s ×ˢ t).filter (λ (x : α × β), p x.1 ∧ q x.2) = s.filter p ×ˢ t.filter q :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩, simp only [mem_filter, mem_product],
exact and_and_and_comm (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t) (p a) (q b) }
lemma filter_product_left (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
(s ×ˢ t).filter (λ (x : α × β), p x.1) = s.filter p ×ˢ t :=
by simpa using filter_product p (λ _, true)
lemma filter_product_right (q : β → Prop) [decidable_pred q] :
(s ×ˢ t).filter (λ (x : α × β), q x.2) = s ×ˢ t.filter q :=
by simpa using filter_product (λ _ : α, true) q
lemma filter_product_card (s : finset α) (t : finset β)
(p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter (λ (x : α × β), p x.1 ↔ q x.2)).card =
(s.filter p).card * (t.filter q).card + (s.filter (not ∘ p)).card * (t.filter (not ∘ q)).card :=
begin
classical,
rw [← card_product, ← card_product, ← filter_product, ← filter_product, ← card_union_eq],
{ apply congr_arg, ext ⟨a, b⟩, simp only [filter_union_right, mem_filter, mem_product],
split; intros h; use h.1,
simp only [function.comp_app, and_self, h.2, em (q b)],
cases h.2; { try { simp at h_1 }, simp [h_1] } },
{ apply finset.disjoint_filter_filter',
exact (disjoint_compl_right.inf_left _).inf_right _ }
end
lemma empty_product (t : finset β) : (∅ : finset α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := rfl
lemma product_empty (s : finset α) : s ×ˢ (∅ : finset β) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (λ x h, (finset.mem_product.1 h).2)
lemma nonempty.product (hs : s.nonempty) (ht : t.nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs, ⟨y, hy⟩ := ht in ⟨(x, y), mem_product.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
lemma nonempty.fst (h : (s ×ˢ t).nonempty) : s.nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h in ⟨xy.1, (mem_product.1 hxy).1⟩
lemma nonempty.snd (h : (s ×ˢ t).nonempty) : t.nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h in ⟨xy.2, (mem_product.1 hxy).2⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_product : (s ×ˢ t).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty ∧ t.nonempty :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, λ h, h.1.product h.2⟩
@[simp] lemma product_eq_empty {s : finset α} {t : finset β} : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
by rw [←not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_product, not_and_distrib, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty,
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
@[simp] lemma singleton_product {a : α} :
({a} : finset α) ×ˢ t = t.map ⟨prod.mk a, prod.mk.inj_left _⟩ :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and.left_comm, eq_comm] }
@[simp] lemma product_singleton {b : β} :
s ×ˢ {b} = s.map ⟨λ i, (i, b), prod.mk.inj_right _⟩ :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and.left_comm, eq_comm] }
lemma singleton_product_singleton {a : α} {b : β} :
({a} : finset α) ×ˢ ({b} : finset β) = {(a, b)} :=
by simp only [product_singleton, function.embedding.coe_fn_mk, map_singleton]
@[simp] lemma union_product [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] :
(s ∪ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∪ s' ×ˢ t :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp only [or_and_distrib_right, mem_union, mem_product] }
@[simp] lemma product_union [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] :
s ×ˢ (t ∪ t') = s ×ˢ t ∪ s ×ˢ t' :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp only [and_or_distrib_left, mem_union, mem_product] }
lemma inter_product [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] :
(s ∩ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp only [←and_and_distrib_right, mem_inter, mem_product] }
lemma product_inter [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] :
s ×ˢ (t ∩ t') = s ×ˢ t ∩ s ×ˢ t' :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp only [←and_and_distrib_left, mem_inter, mem_product] }
lemma product_inter_product [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] :
s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t' = (s ∩ s') ×ˢ (t ∩ t') :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp only [and_assoc, and.left_comm, mem_inter, mem_product] }
lemma disjoint_product : disjoint (s ×ˢ t) (s' ×ˢ t') ↔ disjoint s s' ∨ disjoint t t' :=
by simp_rw [←disjoint_coe, coe_product, set.disjoint_prod]
@[simp] lemma disj_union_product (hs : disjoint s s') :
s.disj_union s' hs ×ˢ t = (s ×ˢ t).disj_union (s' ×ˢ t)
(disjoint_product.mpr $ or.inl hs) :=
eq_of_veq $ multiset.add_product _ _ _
@[simp] lemma product_disj_union (ht : disjoint t t') :
s ×ˢ t.disj_union t' ht = (s ×ˢ t).disj_union (s ×ˢ t')
(disjoint_product.mpr $ or.inr ht) :=
eq_of_veq $ multiset.product_add _ _ _
end prod
section diag
variables [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α)
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the diagonal, `s.diag` is the set of pairs of the form `(a, a)` for
`a ∈ s`. -/
def diag := (s ×ˢ s).filter (λ a : α × α, a.fst = a.snd)
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the off-diagonal, `s.off_diag` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` with `a ≠ b`
for `a, b ∈ s`. -/
def off_diag := (s ×ˢ s).filter (λ (a : α × α), a.fst ≠ a.snd)
variables {s} {x : α × α}
@[simp] lemma mem_diag : x ∈ s.diag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.1 = x.2 :=
by { simp only [diag, mem_filter, mem_product], split; intros h;
simp only [h, and_true, eq_self_iff_true, and_self], rw ←h.2, exact h.1 }
@[simp] lemma mem_off_diag : x ∈ s.off_diag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ s ∧ x.1 ≠ x.2 :=
by { simp only [off_diag, mem_filter, mem_product], split; intros h;
simp only [h, ne.def, not_false_iff, and_self] }
variables (s)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_off_diag : (s.off_diag : set (α × α)) = (s : set α).off_diag :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_off_diag
@[simp] lemma diag_card : (diag s).card = s.card :=
begin
suffices : diag s = s.image (λ a, (a, a)),
{ rw this, apply card_image_of_inj_on, exact λ x1 h1 x2 h2 h3, (prod.mk.inj h3).1 },
ext ⟨a₁, a₂⟩, rw mem_diag, split; intros h; rw finset.mem_image at *,
{ use [a₁, h.1, prod.mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨rfl, h.2⟩] },
{ rcases h with ⟨a, h1, h2⟩, have h := prod.mk.inj h2, rw [←h.1, ←h.2], use h1 },
end
@[simp] lemma off_diag_card : (off_diag s).card = s.card * s.card - s.card :=
begin
suffices : (diag s).card + (off_diag s).card = s.card * s.card,
{ nth_rewrite 2 ← s.diag_card, simp only [diag_card] at *, rw tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev, rw this },
rw ← card_product,
apply filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card,
end
@[mono] lemma diag_mono : monotone (diag : finset α → finset (α × α)) :=
λ s t h x hx, mem_diag.2 $ and.imp_left (@h _) $ mem_diag.1 hx
@[mono] lemma off_diag_mono : monotone (off_diag : finset α → finset (α × α)) :=
λ s t h x hx, mem_off_diag.2 $ and.imp (@h _) (and.imp_left $ @h _) $ mem_off_diag.1 hx
@[simp] lemma diag_empty : (∅ : finset α).diag = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma off_diag_empty : (∅ : finset α).off_diag = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma diag_union_off_diag : s.diag ∪ s.off_diag = s ×ˢ s :=
filter_union_filter_neg_eq _ _
@[simp] lemma disjoint_diag_off_diag : disjoint s.diag s.off_diag :=
disjoint_filter_filter_neg _ _ _
lemma product_sdiff_diag : s ×ˢ s \ s.diag = s.off_diag :=
by rw [←diag_union_off_diag, union_comm, union_sdiff_self,
sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint (disjoint_diag_off_diag _).symm]
lemma product_sdiff_off_diag : s ×ˢ s \ s.off_diag = s.diag :=
by rw [←diag_union_off_diag, union_sdiff_self, sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint (disjoint_diag_off_diag _)]
lemma diag_inter : (s ∩ t).diag = s.diag ∩ t.diag :=
ext $ λ x, by simpa only [mem_diag, mem_inter] using and_and_distrib_right _ _ _
lemma off_diag_inter : (s ∩ t).off_diag = s.off_diag ∩ t.off_diag :=
coe_injective $ by { push_cast, exact set.off_diag_inter _ _ }
lemma diag_union : (s ∪ t).diag = s.diag ∪ t.diag :=
by { ext ⟨i, j⟩, simp only [mem_diag, mem_union, or_and_distrib_right] }
variables {s t}
lemma off_diag_union (h : disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).off_diag = s.off_diag ∪ t.off_diag ∪ s ×ˢ t ∪ t ×ˢ s :=
coe_injective $ by { push_cast, exact set.off_diag_union (disjoint_coe.2 h) }
variables (a : α)
@[simp] lemma off_diag_singleton : ({a} : finset α).off_diag = ∅ :=
by simp [←finset.card_eq_zero]
lemma diag_singleton : ({a} : finset α).diag = {(a, a)} :=
by rw [←product_sdiff_off_diag, off_diag_singleton, sdiff_empty, singleton_product_singleton]
lemma diag_insert : (insert a s).diag = insert (a, a) s.diag :=
by rw [insert_eq, insert_eq, diag_union, diag_singleton]
lemma off_diag_insert (has : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s).off_diag = s.off_diag ∪ {a} ×ˢ s ∪ s ×ˢ {a} :=
by rw [insert_eq, union_comm, off_diag_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has), off_diag_singleton,
union_empty, union_right_comm]
end diag
end finset
|
57240b4dc409a530bc42eb794d4a309655409ce3 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/order/complete_lattice.lean | e67a577f6f81fa018908521da6fc878850e26910 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 53,728 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.bool.set
import data.nat.basic
import order.bounds
/-!
# Theory of complete lattices
## Main definitions
* `Sup` and `Inf` are the supremum and the infimum of a set;
* `supr (f : ι → α)` and `infi (f : ι → α)` are indexed supremum and infimum of a function,
defined as `Sup` and `Inf` of the range of this function;
* `class complete_lattice`: a bounded lattice such that `Sup s` is always the least upper boundary
of `s` and `Inf s` is always the greatest lower boundary of `s`;
* `class complete_linear_order`: a linear ordered complete lattice.
## Naming conventions
In lemma names,
* `Sup` is called `Sup`
* `Inf` is called `Inf`
* `⨆ i, s i` is called `supr`
* `⨅ i, s i` is called `infi`
* `⨆ i j, s i j` is called `supr₂`. This is a `supr` inside a `supr`.
* `⨅ i j, s i j` is called `infi₂`. This is an `infi` inside an `infi`.
* `⨆ i ∈ s, t i` is called `bsupr` for "bounded `supr`". This is the special case of `supr₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⨅ i ∈ s, t i` is called `binfi` for "bounded `infi`". This is the special case of `infi₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⨆ i, f i` : `supr f`, the supremum of the range of `f`;
* `⨅ i, f i` : `infi f`, the infimum of the range of `f`.
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open set function
variables {α β β₂ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
/-- class for the `Sup` operator -/
class has_Sup (α : Type*) := (Sup : set α → α)
/-- class for the `Inf` operator -/
class has_Inf (α : Type*) := (Inf : set α → α)
export has_Sup (Sup) has_Inf (Inf)
/-- Supremum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Sup.Sup
/-- Infimum of a set -/
add_decl_doc has_Inf.Inf
/-- Indexed supremum -/
def supr [has_Sup α] {ι} (s : ι → α) : α := Sup (range s)
/-- Indexed infimum -/
def infi [has_Inf α] {ι} (s : ι → α) : α := Inf (range s)
@[priority 50] instance has_Inf_to_nonempty (α) [has_Inf α] : nonempty α := ⟨Inf ∅⟩
@[priority 50] instance has_Sup_to_nonempty (α) [has_Sup α] : nonempty α := ⟨Sup ∅⟩
notation `⨆` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, supr f) := r
notation `⨅` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, infi f) := r
instance (α) [has_Inf α] : has_Sup αᵒᵈ := ⟨(Inf : set α → α)⟩
instance (α) [has_Sup α] : has_Inf αᵒᵈ := ⟨(Sup : set α → α)⟩
/--
Note that we rarely use `complete_semilattice_Sup`
(in fact, any such object is always a `complete_lattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
@[ancestor partial_order has_Sup]
class complete_semilattice_Sup (α : Type*) extends partial_order α, has_Sup α :=
(le_Sup : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ Sup s)
(Sup_le : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a)
section
variables [complete_semilattice_Sup α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
@[ematch] theorem le_Sup : a ∈ s → a ≤ Sup s := complete_semilattice_Sup.le_Sup s a
theorem Sup_le : (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → Sup s ≤ a := complete_semilattice_Sup.Sup_le s a
lemma is_lub_Sup (s : set α) : is_lub s (Sup s) := ⟨λ x, le_Sup, λ x, Sup_le⟩
lemma is_lub.Sup_eq (h : is_lub s a) : Sup s = a := (is_lub_Sup s).unique h
theorem le_Sup_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ Sup s :=
le_trans h (le_Sup hb)
theorem Sup_le_Sup (h : s ⊆ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
(is_lub_Sup s).mono (is_lub_Sup t) h
@[simp] theorem Sup_le_iff : Sup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
is_lub_le_iff (is_lub_Sup s)
lemma le_Sup_iff : a ≤ Sup s ↔ ∀ b ∈ upper_bounds s, a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans h (Sup_le hb), λ hb, hb _ (λ x, le_Sup)⟩
lemma le_supr_iff {s : ι → α} : a ≤ supr s ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, s i ≤ b) → a ≤ b :=
by simp [supr, le_Sup_iff, upper_bounds]
theorem Sup_le_Sup_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
le_Sup_iff.2 $ λ b hb, Sup_le $ λ a ha, let ⟨c, hct, hac⟩ := h a ha in hac.trans (hb hct)
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cSup_singleton`.
theorem Sup_singleton {a : α} : Sup {a} = a :=
is_lub_singleton.Sup_eq
end
/--
Note that we rarely use `complete_semilattice_Inf`
(in fact, any such object is always a `complete_lattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
@[ancestor partial_order has_Inf]
class complete_semilattice_Inf (α : Type*) extends partial_order α, has_Inf α :=
(Inf_le : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, Inf s ≤ a)
(le_Inf : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s)
section
variables [complete_semilattice_Inf α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
@[ematch] theorem Inf_le : a ∈ s → Inf s ≤ a := complete_semilattice_Inf.Inf_le s a
theorem le_Inf : (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ Inf s := complete_semilattice_Inf.le_Inf s a
lemma is_glb_Inf (s : set α) : is_glb s (Inf s) := ⟨λ a, Inf_le, λ a, le_Inf⟩
lemma is_glb.Inf_eq (h : is_glb s a) : Inf s = a := (is_glb_Inf s).unique h
theorem Inf_le_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : Inf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (Inf_le hb) h
theorem Inf_le_Inf (h : s ⊆ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
(is_glb_Inf s).mono (is_glb_Inf t) h
@[simp] theorem le_Inf_iff : a ≤ Inf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_is_glb_iff (is_glb_Inf s)
lemma Inf_le_iff : Inf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lower_bounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans (le_Inf hb) h, λ hb, hb _ (λ x, Inf_le)⟩
lemma infi_le_iff {s : ι → α} : infi s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, b ≤ s i) → b ≤ a :=
by simp [infi, Inf_le_iff, lower_bounds]
theorem Inf_le_Inf_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
le_of_forall_le begin
simp only [le_Inf_iff],
introv h₀ h₁,
rcases h _ h₁ with ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩,
solve_by_elim [le_trans _ hy']
end
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cInf_singleton`.
theorem Inf_singleton {a : α} : Inf {a} = a :=
is_glb_singleton.Inf_eq
end
/-- A complete lattice is a bounded lattice which has suprema and infima for every subset. -/
@[protect_proj, ancestor lattice complete_semilattice_Sup complete_semilattice_Inf has_top has_bot]
class complete_lattice (α : Type*) extends
lattice α, complete_semilattice_Sup α, complete_semilattice_Inf α, has_top α, has_bot α :=
(le_top : ∀ x : α, x ≤ ⊤)
(bot_le : ∀ x : α, ⊥ ≤ x)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance complete_lattice.to_bounded_order [h : complete_lattice α] : bounded_order α :=
{ ..h }
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Inf` function
that returns the greatest lower bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `complete_lattice`
instance as
```
instance : complete_lattice my_T :=
{ inf := better_inf,
le_inf := ...,
inf_le_right := ...,
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, Sup, bot, top
..complete_lattice_of_Inf my_T _ }
```
-/
def complete_lattice_of_Inf (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Inf α] (is_glb_Inf : ∀ s : set α, is_glb s (Inf s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ bot := Inf univ,
bot_le := λ x, (is_glb_Inf univ).1 trivial,
top := Inf ∅,
le_top := λ a, (is_glb_Inf ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
inf := λ a b, Inf {a, b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, by { apply (is_glb_Inf _).2, simp [*] },
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_glb_Inf _).1 $ by simp [*],
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.left,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_glb_Inf _).2 $ λ x, and.right,
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).2 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf s).1 ha,
Sup := λ s, Inf (upper_bounds s),
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).2 $ λ b hb, hb ha,
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_glb_Inf (upper_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/--
Any `complete_semilattice_Inf` is in fact a `complete_lattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `complete_lattice_of_Inf`.
-/
def complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Inf (α : Type*) [complete_semilattice_Inf α] :
complete_lattice α :=
complete_lattice_of_Inf α (λ s, is_glb_Inf s)
/-- Create a `complete_lattice` from a `partial_order` and `Sup` function
that returns the least upper bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `complete_lattice`
instance as
```
instance : complete_lattice my_T :=
{ inf := better_inf,
le_inf := ...,
inf_le_right := ...,
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, Inf, bot, top
..complete_lattice_of_Sup my_T _ }
```
-/
def complete_lattice_of_Sup (α : Type*) [H1 : partial_order α]
[H2 : has_Sup α] (is_lub_Sup : ∀ s : set α, is_lub s (Sup s)) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ top := Sup univ,
le_top := λ x, (is_lub_Sup univ).1 trivial,
bot := Sup ∅,
bot_le := λ x, (is_lub_Sup ∅).2 $ by simp,
sup := λ a b, Sup {a, b},
sup_le := λ a b c hac hbc, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (by simp [*]),
le_sup_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert _ _,
le_sup_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ mem_insert_of_mem _ $ mem_singleton _,
inf := λ a b, Sup {x | x ≤ a ∧ x ≤ b},
le_inf := λ a b c hab hac, (is_lub_Sup _).1 $ by simp [*],
inf_le_left := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.left),
inf_le_right := λ a b, (is_lub_Sup _).2 (λ x, and.right),
Inf := λ s, Sup (lower_bounds s),
Sup_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).2 ha,
le_Sup := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup s).1 ha,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).2 (λ b hb, hb ha),
le_Inf := λ s a ha, (is_lub_Sup (lower_bounds s)).1 ha,
.. H1, .. H2 }
/--
Any `complete_semilattice_Sup` is in fact a `complete_lattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `complete_lattice_of_Sup`.
-/
def complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Sup (α : Type*) [complete_semilattice_Sup α] :
complete_lattice α :=
complete_lattice_of_Sup α (λ s, is_lub_Sup s)
/-- A complete linear order is a linear order whose lattice structure is complete. -/
class complete_linear_order (α : Type*) extends complete_lattice α,
linear_order α renaming max → sup min → inf
namespace order_dual
variable (α)
instance [complete_lattice α] : complete_lattice αᵒᵈ :=
{ le_Sup := @complete_lattice.Inf_le α _,
Sup_le := @complete_lattice.le_Inf α _,
Inf_le := @complete_lattice.le_Sup α _,
le_Inf := @complete_lattice.Sup_le α _,
.. order_dual.lattice α, ..order_dual.has_Sup α, ..order_dual.has_Inf α,
.. order_dual.bounded_order α }
instance [complete_linear_order α] : complete_linear_order αᵒᵈ :=
{ .. order_dual.complete_lattice α, .. order_dual.linear_order α }
end order_dual
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
theorem Inf_le_Sup (hs : s.nonempty) : Inf s ≤ Sup s :=
is_glb_le_is_lub (is_glb_Inf s) (is_lub_Sup s) hs
theorem Sup_union {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∪ t) = Sup s ⊔ Sup t :=
((is_lub_Sup s).union (is_lub_Sup t)).Sup_eq
theorem Sup_inter_le {s t : set α} : Sup (s ∩ t) ≤ Sup s ⊓ Sup t :=
Sup_le $ λ b hb, le_inf (le_Sup hb.1) (le_Sup hb.2)
/-
Sup_le (λ a ⟨a_s, a_t⟩, le_inf (le_Sup a_s) (le_Sup a_t))
-/
theorem Inf_union {s t : set α} : Inf (s ∪ t) = Inf s ⊓ Inf t :=
((is_glb_Inf s).union (is_glb_Inf t)).Inf_eq
theorem le_Inf_inter {s t : set α} : Inf s ⊔ Inf t ≤ Inf (s ∩ t) := @Sup_inter_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Sup_empty : Sup ∅ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@is_lub_empty α _ _).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_empty : Inf ∅ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_glb_empty α _ _).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Sup_univ : Sup univ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@is_lub_univ α _ _).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_univ : Inf univ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@is_glb_univ α _ _).Inf_eq
-- TODO(Jeremy): get this automatically
@[simp] theorem Sup_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Sup (insert a s) = a ⊔ Sup s :=
((is_lub_Sup s).insert a).Sup_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_insert {a : α} {s : set α} : Inf (insert a s) = a ⊓ Inf s :=
((is_glb_Inf s).insert a).Inf_eq
theorem Sup_le_Sup_of_subset_insert_bot (h : s ⊆ insert ⊥ t) : Sup s ≤ Sup t :=
le_trans (Sup_le_Sup h) (le_of_eq (trans Sup_insert bot_sup_eq))
theorem Inf_le_Inf_of_subset_insert_top (h : s ⊆ insert ⊤ t) : Inf t ≤ Inf s :=
le_trans (le_of_eq (trans top_inf_eq.symm Inf_insert.symm)) (Inf_le_Inf h)
theorem Sup_pair {a b : α} : Sup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@is_lub_pair α _ a b).Sup_eq
theorem Inf_pair {a b : α} : Inf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@is_glb_pair α _ a b).Inf_eq
@[simp] theorem Inf_eq_top : Inf s = ⊤ ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊤) :=
iff.intro
(λ h a ha, top_unique $ h ▸ Inf_le ha)
(λ h, top_unique $ le_Inf $ λ a ha, top_le_iff.2 $ h a ha)
lemma eq_singleton_top_of_Inf_eq_top_of_nonempty {s : set α}
(h_inf : Inf s = ⊤) (hne : s.nonempty) : s = {⊤} :=
by { rw set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, rw Inf_eq_top at h_inf, exact ⟨hne, h_inf⟩, }
@[simp] lemma Sup_eq_bot : Sup s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊥ := @Inf_eq_top αᵒᵈ _ _
lemma eq_singleton_bot_of_Sup_eq_bot_of_nonempty {s : set α}
(h_sup : Sup s = ⊥) (hne : s.nonempty) : s = {⊥} :=
by { rw set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, rw Sup_eq_bot at h_sup, exact ⟨hne, h_sup⟩, }
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w < b`.
See `cSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (_ : ∀a∈s, a ≤ b)
(H : ∀w, w < b → (∃a∈s, w < a)) : Sup s = b :=
have h : (Sup s < b) ∨ (Sup s = b) := lt_or_eq_of_le (Sup_le ‹∀a∈s, a ≤ b›),
have ¬(Sup s < b) := λ hb,
let ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := H (Sup s) hb in /- a ∈ s, Sup s < a-/
have Sup s < Sup s := lt_of_lt_of_le ha' (le_Sup ha),
show false, from lt_irrefl _ this,
show Sup s = b, from or.resolve_left h this
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w > b`.
See `cInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem Inf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt : (∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) →
(∀ w, b < w → (∃ a ∈ s, a < w)) → Inf s = b :=
@Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ ‹_›
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
lemma Inf_lt_iff : Inf s < b ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a < b := is_glb_lt_iff $ is_glb_Inf s
lemma lt_Sup_iff : b < Sup s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b < a := lt_is_lub_iff $ is_lub_Sup s
lemma Sup_eq_top : Sup s = ⊤ ↔ (∀ b < ⊤, ∃ a ∈ s, b < a) :=
iff.intro
(λ (h : Sup s = ⊤) b hb, by rwa [←h, lt_Sup_iff] at hb)
(λ h, top_unique $ le_of_not_gt $ λ h',
let ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := h _ h' in
lt_irrefl a $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_Sup ha) h)
lemma Inf_eq_bot : Inf s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b > ⊥, ∃ a ∈ s, a < b := @Sup_eq_top αᵒᵈ _ _
lemma lt_supr_iff {f : ι → α} : a < supr f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i := lt_Sup_iff.trans exists_range_iff
lemma infi_lt_iff {f : ι → α} : infi f < a ↔ ∃ i, f i < a := Inf_lt_iff.trans exists_range_iff
end complete_linear_order
/-
### supr & infi
-/
section has_Sup
variables [has_Sup α] {f g : ι → α}
lemma Sup_range : Sup (range f) = supr f := rfl
lemma Sup_eq_supr' (s : set α) : Sup s = ⨆ a : s, a := by rw [supr, subtype.range_coe]
lemma supr_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, g i := congr_arg _ $ funext h
lemma function.surjective.supr_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
(⨆ x, g (f x)) = ⨆ y, g y :=
by simp only [supr, hf.range_comp]
protected lemma function.surjective.supr_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ y, g y :=
by { convert h1.supr_comp g, exact (funext h2).symm }
@[congr] lemma supr_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : supr f₁ = supr f₂ :=
begin
obtain rfl := propext pq,
congr' with x,
apply f
end
lemma supr_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : (⨆ b : range f, g b) = ⨆ i, g (f i) :=
by rw [supr, supr, ← image_eq_range, ← range_comp]
lemma Sup_image' {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Sup (f '' s) = ⨆ a : s, f a :=
by rw [supr, image_eq_range]
end has_Sup
section has_Inf
variables [has_Inf α] {f g : ι → α}
lemma Inf_range : Inf (range f) = infi f := rfl
lemma Inf_eq_infi' (s : set α) : Inf s = ⨅ a : s, a := @Sup_eq_supr' αᵒᵈ _ _
lemma infi_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, g i := congr_arg _ $ funext h
lemma function.surjective.infi_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
(⨅ x, g (f x)) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@function.surjective.supr_comp αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f hf g
lemma function.surjective.infi_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : (⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@function.surjective.supr_congr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h h1 h2
@[congr]lemma infi_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α}
(pq : p ↔ q) (f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : infi f₁ = infi f₂ :=
@supr_congr_Prop αᵒᵈ _ p q f₁ f₂ pq f
lemma infi_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : (⨅ b : range f, g b) = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
@supr_range' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
lemma Inf_image' {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Inf (f '' s) = ⨅ a : s, f a := @Sup_image' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end has_Inf
section
variables [complete_lattice α] {f g s t : ι → α} {a b : α}
-- TODO: this declaration gives error when starting smt state
--@[ematch]
lemma le_supr (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : f i ≤ supr f := le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
lemma infi_le (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : infi f ≤ f i := Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] lemma le_supr' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: f i ≤ supr f :) := le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
@[ematch] lemma infi_le' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: infi f ≤ f i :) := Inf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
/- TODO: this version would be more powerful, but, alas, the pattern matcher
doesn't accept it.
@[ematch] lemma le_supr' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : (: f i :) ≤ (: supr f :) :=
le_Sup ⟨i, rfl⟩
-/
lemma is_lub_supr : is_lub (range f) (⨆ j, f j) := is_lub_Sup _
lemma is_glb_infi : is_glb (range f) (⨅ j, f j) := is_glb_Inf _
lemma is_lub.supr_eq (h : is_lub (range f) a) : (⨆ j, f j) = a := h.Sup_eq
lemma is_glb.infi_eq (h : is_glb (range f) a) : (⨅ j, f j) = a := h.Inf_eq
lemma le_supr_of_le (i : ι) (h : a ≤ f i) : a ≤ supr f := h.trans $ le_supr _ i
lemma infi_le_of_le (i : ι) (h : f i ≤ a) : infi f ≤ a := (infi_le _ i).trans h
lemma le_supr₂ {f : Π i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : f i j ≤ ⨆ i j, f i j :=
le_supr_of_le i $ le_supr (f i) j
lemma infi₂_le {f : Π i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : (⨅ i j, f i j) ≤ f i j :=
infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le (f i) j
lemma le_supr₂_of_le {f : Π i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : a ≤ f i j) : a ≤ ⨆ i j, f i j :=
h.trans $ le_supr₂ i j
lemma infi₂_le_of_le {f : Π i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : f i j ≤ a) : (⨅ i j, f i j) ≤ a :=
(infi₂_le i j).trans h
lemma supr_le (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) : supr f ≤ a := Sup_le $ λ b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
lemma le_infi (h : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) : a ≤ infi f := le_Inf $ λ b ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i
lemma supr₂_le {f : Π i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a) : (⨆ i j, f i j) ≤ a :=
supr_le $ λ i, supr_le $ h i
lemma le_infi₂ {f : Π i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j) : a ≤ ⨅ i j, f i j :=
le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ h i
lemma supr₂_le_supr (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : (⨆ i (j : κ i), f i) ≤ ⨆ i, f i :=
supr₂_le $ λ i j, le_supr f i
lemma infi_le_infi₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : (⨅ i, f i) ≤ ⨅ i (j : κ i), f i :=
le_infi₂ $ λ i j, infi_le f i
lemma supr_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : supr f ≤ supr g := supr_le $ λ i, le_supr_of_le i $ h i
lemma infi_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : infi f ≤ infi g := le_infi $ λ i, infi_le_of_le i $ h i
lemma supr₂_mono {f g : Π i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) : (⨆ i j, f i j) ≤ ⨆ i j, g i j :=
supr_mono $ λ i, supr_mono $ h i
lemma infi₂_mono {f g : Π i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) : (⨅ i j, f i j) ≤ ⨅ i j, g i j :=
infi_mono $ λ i, infi_mono $ h i
lemma supr_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ i', f i ≤ g i') : supr f ≤ supr g :=
supr_le $ λ i, exists.elim (h i) le_supr_of_le
lemma infi_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i', ∃ i, f i ≤ g i') : infi f ≤ infi g :=
le_infi $ λ i', exists.elim (h i') infi_le_of_le
lemma supr₂_mono' {f : Π i, κ i → α} {g : Π i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i j ≤ g i' j') :
(⨆ i j, f i j) ≤ ⨆ i j, g i j :=
supr₂_le $ λ i j, let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j in le_supr₂_of_le i' j' h
lemma infi₂_mono' {f : Π i, κ i → α} {g : Π i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i' j' ≤ g i j) :
(⨅ i j, f i j) ≤ ⨅ i j, g i j :=
le_infi₂ $ λ i j, let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j in infi₂_le_of_le i' j' h
lemma supr_const_mono (h : ι → ι') : (⨆ i : ι, a) ≤ ⨆ j : ι', a := supr_le $ le_supr _ ∘ h
lemma infi_const_mono (h : ι' → ι) : (⨅ i : ι, a) ≤ ⨅ j : ι', a := le_infi $ infi_le _ ∘ h
lemma bsupr_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
(⨆ i (h : p i), f i) ≤ ⨆ i (h : q i), f i :=
supr_mono $ λ i, supr_const_mono (hpq i)
lemma binfi_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
(⨅ i (h : q i), f i) ≤ ⨅ i (h : p i), f i :=
infi_mono $ λ i, infi_const_mono (hpq i)
@[simp] lemma supr_le_iff : supr f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(is_lub_le_iff is_lub_supr).trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma le_infi_iff : a ≤ infi f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
(le_is_glb_iff is_glb_infi).trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma supr₂_le_iff {f : Π i, κ i → α} : (⨆ i j, f i j) ≤ a ↔ ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a :=
by simp_rw supr_le_iff
@[simp] lemma le_infi₂_iff {f : Π i, κ i → α} : a ≤ (⨅ i j, f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j :=
by simp_rw le_infi_iff
lemma supr_lt_iff : supr f < a ↔ ∃ b, b < a ∧ ∀ i, f i ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨supr f, h, le_supr f⟩, λ ⟨b, h, hb⟩, (supr_le hb).trans_lt h⟩
lemma lt_infi_iff : a < infi f ↔ ∃ b, a < b ∧ ∀ i, b ≤ f i :=
⟨λ h, ⟨infi f, h, infi_le f⟩, λ ⟨b, h, hb⟩, h.trans_le $ le_infi hb⟩
lemma Sup_eq_supr {s : set α} : Sup s = ⨆ a ∈ s, a :=
le_antisymm (Sup_le le_supr₂) (supr₂_le $ λ b, le_Sup)
lemma Inf_eq_infi {s : set α} : Inf s = ⨅ a ∈ s, a := @Sup_eq_supr αᵒᵈ _ _
lemma Sup_sUnion (s : set (set α)) : Sup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, Sup t :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply Sup_le (λ b hb, _),
rcases hb with ⟨t, ts, bt⟩,
apply le_trans _ (le_supr _ t),
exact le_trans (le_Sup bt) (le_supr _ ts), },
{ apply supr_le (λ t, _),
exact supr_le (λ ts, Sup_le_Sup (λ x xt, ⟨t, ts, xt⟩)) }
end
lemma Inf_sUnion (s : set (set α)) : Inf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, Inf t := @Sup_sUnion αᵒᵈ _ _
lemma monotone.le_map_supr [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆ i, f (s i)) ≤ f (supr s) :=
supr_le $ λ i, hf $ le_supr _ _
lemma monotone.le_map_supr₂ [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) (s : Π i, κ i → α) :
(⨆ i j, f (s i j)) ≤ f (⨆ i j, s i j) :=
calc (⨆ i j, f (s i j)) ≤ (⨆ i, f (⨆ j, s i j)) :
supr_mono $ λ i, hf.le_map_supr
... ≤ f (⨆ i j, s i j) : hf.le_map_supr
lemma monotone.le_map_Sup [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
(⨆ a ∈ s, f a) ≤ f (Sup s) :=
by rw [Sup_eq_supr]; exact hf.le_map_supr₂ _
lemma antitone.le_map_infi [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) :
(⨆ i, f (s i)) ≤ f (infi s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_supr
lemma antitone.le_map_infi₂ [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) (s : Π i, κ i → α) :
(⨆ i j, f (s i j)) ≤ f (⨅ i j, s i j) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_supr₂ _
lemma antitone.le_map_Inf [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) :
(⨆ a ∈ s, f a) ≤ f (Inf s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_Sup
lemma order_iso.map_supr [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨆ i, x i) = ⨆ i, f (x i) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ f.surjective.forall.2 $ λ x,
by simp only [f.le_iff_le, supr_le_iff]
lemma order_iso.map_Sup [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : set α) :
f (Sup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a :=
by simp only [Sup_eq_supr, order_iso.map_supr]
lemma supr_comp_le {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : (⨆ x, f (g x)) ≤ ⨆ y, f y :=
supr_mono' $ λ x, ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
lemma monotone.supr_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ≤ s i) : (⨆ x, f (s x)) = ⨆ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (supr_comp_le _ _) (supr_mono' $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi)
lemma monotone.map_infi_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (infi s) ≤ (⨅ i, f (s i)) :=
le_infi $ λ i, hf $ infi_le _ _
lemma monotone.map_infi₂_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) (s : Π i, κ i → α) :
f (⨅ i j, s i j) ≤ ⨅ i j, f (s i j) :=
hf.dual.le_map_supr₂ _
lemma monotone.map_Inf_le [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
f (Inf s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
by rw [Inf_eq_infi]; exact hf.map_infi₂_le _
lemma antitone.map_supr_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) :
f (supr s) ≤ ⨅ i, f (s i) :=
hf.dual_left.map_infi_le
lemma antitone.map_supr₂_le [complete_lattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) (s : Π i, κ i → α) :
f (⨆ i j, s i j) ≤ ⨅ i j, f (s i j) :=
hf.dual_left.map_infi₂_le _
lemma antitone.map_Sup_le [complete_lattice β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) :
f (Sup s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
hf.dual_left.map_Inf_le
lemma order_iso.map_infi [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨅ i, x i) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
order_iso.map_supr f.dual _
lemma order_iso.map_Inf [complete_lattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : set α) :
f (Inf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
order_iso.map_Sup f.dual _
lemma le_infi_comp {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : (⨅ y, f y) ≤ ⨅ x, f (g x) :=
infi_mono' $ λ x, ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
lemma monotone.infi_comp_eq [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{s : ι → β} (hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, s i ≤ x) : (⨅ x, f (s x)) = ⨅ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (infi_mono' $ λ x, (hs x).imp $ λ i hi, hf hi) (le_infi_comp _ _)
lemma supr_const_le {x : α} : (⨆ (h : ι), x) ≤ x :=
supr_le (λ _, le_rfl)
lemma le_infi_const {x : α} : x ≤ (⨅ (h : ι), x) :=
le_infi (λ _, le_rfl)
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `cinfi_const`.
theorem infi_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨅ b : ι, a) = a :=
by rw [infi, range_const, Inf_singleton]
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csupr_const`.
theorem supr_const [nonempty ι] {a : α} : (⨆ b : ι, a) = a := @infi_const αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma infi_top : (⨅ i:ι, ⊤ : α) = ⊤ := top_unique $ le_infi $ λ i, le_rfl
@[simp] lemma supr_bot : (⨆ i:ι, ⊥ : α) = ⊥ := @infi_top αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] lemma supr_eq_bot : supr s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊥ := Sup_eq_bot.trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma infi_eq_top : infi s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊤ := Inf_eq_top.trans forall_range_iff
@[simp] lemma supr₂_eq_bot {f : Π i, κ i → α} : (⨆ i j, f i j) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊥ :=
by simp_rw supr_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma infi₂_eq_top {f : Π i, κ i → α} : (⨅ i j, f i j) = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊤ :=
by simp_rw infi_eq_top
@[simp] lemma supr_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ λ h, le_rfl) (le_supr _ _)
@[simp] lemma infi_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = f hp :=
le_antisymm (infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ λ h, le_rfl)
@[simp] lemma supr_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨆ h : p, f h) = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ λ h, (hp h).elim) bot_le
@[simp] lemma infi_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬ p) : (⨅ h : p, f h) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top $ le_infi $ λ h, (hp h).elim
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `csupr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem supr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt {f : ι → α} (h₁ : ∀ i, f i ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → (∃ i, w < f i)) : (⨆ (i : ι), f i) = b :=
Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (forall_range_iff.mpr h₁)
(λ w hw, exists_range_iff.mpr $ h₂ w hw)
/--Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `cinfi_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem infi_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt {f : ι → α} (h₁ : ∀ i, b ≤ f i)
(h₂ : ∀ w, b < w → (∃ i, f i < w)) : (⨅ (i : ι), f i) = b :=
@supr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
lemma supr_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨆ h : p, a h) = if h : p then a h else ⊥ :=
by by_cases p; simp [h]
lemma supr_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨆ h : p, a) = if p then a else ⊥ :=
supr_eq_dif (λ _, a)
lemma infi_eq_dif {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : p → α) :
(⨅ h : p, a h) = if h : p then a h else ⊤ :=
@supr_eq_dif αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
lemma infi_eq_if {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a : α) :
(⨅ h : p, a) = if p then a else ⊤ :=
infi_eq_dif (λ _, a)
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
lemma supr_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : (⨆ i j, f i j) = ⨆ j i, f i j :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ λ i, supr_mono $ λ j, le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ λ j, supr_mono $ λ i, le_supr _ _)
-- TODO: should this be @[simp]?
lemma infi_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : (⨅ i j, f i j) = ⨅ j i, f i j := @supr_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/- TODO: this is strange. In the proof below, we get exactly the desired
among the equalities, but close does not get it.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
simp, intros,
begin [smt]
ematch, ematch, ematch, trace_state, have := le_refl (f i_1 i),
trace_state, close
end
end
-/
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_left {b : β} {f : Π x : β, x = b → α} :
(⨅ x, ⨅ h : x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi₂_le _ rfl)
(le_infi $ λ b', le_infi $ λ eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_rfl end)
@[simp] theorem infi_infi_eq_right {b : β} {f : Π x : β, b = x → α} :
(⨅ x, ⨅ h : b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
le_antisymm
(infi₂_le _ rfl)
(le_infi₂ $ λ b' eq, match b', eq with ._, rfl := le_rfl end)
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_left {b : β} {f : Π x : β, x = b → α} :
(⨆ x, ⨆ h : x = b, f x h) = f b rfl :=
@infi_infi_eq_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem supr_supr_eq_right {b : β} {f : Π x : β, b = x → α} :
(⨆ x, ⨆ h : b = x, f x h) = f b rfl :=
@infi_infi_eq_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
attribute [ematch] le_refl
theorem infi_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi₂ $ λ i h, infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ λ ⟨i, h⟩, infi₂_le _ _)
lemma infi_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨅ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@infi_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma infi_subtype'' {ι} (s : set ι) (f : ι → α) :
(⨅ i : s, f i) = ⨅ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ s), f t :=
infi_subtype
theorem infi_inf_eq {f g : ι → α} : (⨅ x, f x ⊓ g x) = (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ (⨅ x, g x) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (infi_mono $ λ i, inf_le_left) $ infi_mono $ λ i, inf_le_right)
(le_infi $ λ i, inf_le_inf (infi_le _ _) $ infi_le _ _)
/- TODO: here is another example where more flexible pattern matching
might help.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
safe, pose h := f a ⊓ g a, begin [smt] ematch, ematch end
end
-/
lemma infi_inf [h : nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ a = (⨅ x, f x ⊓ a) :=
by rw [infi_inf_eq, infi_const]
lemma inf_infi [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : a ⊓ (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ x, a ⊓ f x) :=
by rw [inf_comm, infi_inf]; simp [inf_comm]
lemma binfi_inf {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ a = ⨅ i (h : p i), f i h ⊓ a :=
by haveI : nonempty {i // p i} := (let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h in ⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩);
rw [infi_subtype', infi_subtype', infi_inf]
lemma inf_binfi {p : ι → Prop} {f : Π i (hi : p i), α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
a ⊓ (⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) = ⨅ i (h : p i), a ⊓ f i h :=
by simpa only [inf_comm] using binfi_inf h
theorem supr_sup_eq {f g : ι → α} : (⨆ x, f x ⊔ g x) = (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ (⨆ x, g x) :=
@infi_inf_eq αᵒᵈ ι _ _ _
lemma supr_sup [h : nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ a = (⨆ x, f x ⊔ a) :=
@infi_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
lemma sup_supr [nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : a ⊔ (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ x, a ⊔ f x) :=
@inf_infi αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
/-! ### `supr` and `infi` under `Prop` -/
@[simp] theorem infi_false {s : false → α} : infi s = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top (le_infi $ λ i, false.elim i)
@[simp] theorem supr_false {s : false → α} : supr s = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ λ i, false.elim i) bot_le
lemma supr_true {s : true → α} : supr s = s trivial := supr_pos trivial
lemma infi_true {s : true → α} : infi s = s trivial := infi_pos trivial
@[simp] lemma infi_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ i h, f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
le_antisymm (le_infi₂ $ λ i h, infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ λ ⟨i, h⟩, infi₂_le _ _)
@[simp] lemma supr_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ i h, f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
@infi_exists αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
lemma infi_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : infi s = ⨅ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
le_antisymm (le_infi₂ $ λ i j, infi_le _ _) (le_infi $ λ ⟨i, h⟩, infi₂_le _ _)
/-- The symmetric case of `infi_and`, useful for rewriting into a infimum over a conjunction -/
lemma infi_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨅ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨅ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact infi_and }
lemma supr_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : supr s = ⨆ h₁ h₂, s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := @infi_and αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- The symmetric case of `supr_and`, useful for rewriting into a supremum over a conjunction -/
lemma supr_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
(⨆ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂) = ⨆ (h : p ∧ q), s h.1 h.2 :=
by { symmetry, exact supr_and }
theorem infi_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
infi s = (⨅ h : p, s (or.inl h)) ⊓ (⨅ h : q, s (or.inr h)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (le_infi_comp _ _) $ le_infi_comp _ _)
(le_infi $ λ i, match i with
| or.inl i := inf_le_of_left_le $ infi_le _ _
| or.inr j := inf_le_of_right_le $ infi_le _ _
end)
theorem supr_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
(⨆ x, s x) = (⨆ i, s (or.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, s (or.inr j)) :=
@infi_or αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
section
variables (p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
lemma supr_dite (f : Π i, p i → α) (g : Π i, ¬p i → α) :
(⨆ i, if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), g i h) :=
begin
rw ←supr_sup_eq,
congr' 1 with i,
split_ifs with h;
simp [h],
end
lemma supr_ite (f g : ι → α) :
(⨆ i, if p i then f i else g i) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), g i) :=
supr_dite _ _ _
lemma infi_dite (f : Π i, p i → α) (g : Π i, ¬p i → α) :
(⨅ i, if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), g i h) :=
supr_dite p (show Π i, p i → αᵒᵈ, from f) g
lemma infi_ite (f g : ι → α) :
(⨅ i, if p i then f i else g i) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), g i) :=
infi_dite _ _ _
end
lemma infi_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨅ b ∈ range f, g b) = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
by rw [← infi_subtype'', infi_range']
lemma supr_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : (⨆ b ∈ range f, g b) = ⨆ i, g (f i) :=
@infi_range αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem Inf_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Inf (f '' s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
by rw [← infi_subtype'', Inf_image']
theorem Sup_image {s : set β} {f : β → α} : Sup (f '' s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a := @Inf_image αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-
### supr and infi under set constructions
-/
theorem infi_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊤ :=
by simp
theorem supr_emptyset {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (∅ : set β), f x) = ⊥ :=
by simp
theorem infi_univ {f : β → α} : (⨅ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨅ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem supr_univ {f : β → α} : (⨆ x ∈ (univ : set β), f x) = (⨆ x, f x) :=
by simp
theorem infi_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} : (⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨅x∈s, f x) ⊓ (⨅x∈t, f x) :=
by simp only [← infi_inf_eq, infi_or]
lemma infi_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨅ i, f i) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) ⊓ (⨅ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
by simpa [classical.em] using @infi_union _ _ _ f {i | p i} {i | ¬ p i}
lemma infi_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨅ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊓ (⨅ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
by convert infi_split _ _; simp
theorem infi_le_infi_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨅ x ∈ t, f x) ≤ (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by rw [(union_eq_self_of_subset_left h).symm, infi_union]; exact inf_le_left
theorem supr_union {f : β → α} {s t : set β} :
(⨆ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x) = (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) ⊔ (⨆ x ∈ t, f x) :=
@infi_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
lemma supr_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
(⨆ i, f i) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f i) ⊔ (⨆ i (h : ¬ p i), f i) :=
@infi_split αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
lemma supr_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) :
(⨆ i, f i) = f i₀ ⊔ (⨆ i (h : i ≠ i₀), f i) :=
@infi_split_single αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem supr_le_supr_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) :
(⨆ x ∈ s, f x) ≤ (⨆ x ∈ t, f x) :=
@infi_le_infi_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h
theorem infi_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} :
(⨅ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊓ (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
eq.trans infi_union $ congr_arg (λ x, x ⊓ (⨅ x ∈ s, f x)) infi_infi_eq_left
theorem supr_insert {f : β → α} {s : set β} {b : β} :
(⨆ x ∈ insert b s, f x) = f b ⊔ (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) :=
eq.trans supr_union $ congr_arg (λ x, x ⊔ (⨆ x ∈ s, f x)) supr_supr_eq_left
theorem infi_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
by simp
theorem infi_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨅ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊓ f b :=
by rw [infi_insert, infi_singleton]
theorem supr_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ (singleton b : set β), f x) = f b :=
@infi_singleton αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem supr_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : (⨆ x ∈ ({a, b} : set β), f x) = f a ⊔ f b :=
by rw [supr_insert, supr_singleton]
lemma infi_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨅ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨅ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
by rw [← Inf_image, ← Inf_image, ← image_comp]
lemma supr_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : set β} :
(⨆ c ∈ f '' t, g c) = (⨆ b ∈ t, g (f b)) :=
@infi_image αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
theorem supr_extend_bot {e : ι → β} (he : injective e) (f : ι → α) :
(⨆ j, extend e f ⊥ j) = ⨆ i, f i :=
begin
rw supr_split _ (λ j, ∃ i, e i = j),
simp [extend_apply he, extend_apply', @supr_comm _ β ι] { contextual := tt }
end
/-!
### `supr` and `infi` under `Type`
-/
theorem supr_of_empty' {α ι} [has_Sup α] [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) :
supr f = Sup (∅ : set α) :=
congr_arg Sup (range_eq_empty f)
theorem supr_of_empty [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) : supr f = ⊥ :=
(supr_of_empty' f).trans Sup_empty
theorem infi_of_empty' {α ι} [has_Inf α] [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) :
infi f = Inf (∅ : set α) :=
congr_arg Inf (range_eq_empty f)
theorem infi_of_empty [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) : infi f = ⊤ := @supr_of_empty αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f
lemma supr_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨆b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊔ f ff :=
by rw [supr, bool.range_eq, Sup_pair, sup_comm]
lemma infi_bool_eq {f : bool → α} : (⨅b:bool, f b) = f tt ⊓ f ff := @supr_bool_eq αᵒᵈ _ _
lemma sup_eq_supr (x y : α) : x ⊔ y = ⨆ b : bool, cond b x y :=
by rw [supr_bool_eq, bool.cond_tt, bool.cond_ff]
lemma inf_eq_infi (x y : α) : x ⊓ y = ⨅ b : bool, cond b x y := @sup_eq_supr αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma is_glb_binfi {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_glb (f '' s) (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, infi_subtype'] using @is_glb_infi α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem supr_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : subtype p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h:p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_subtype αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
lemma supr_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
(⨆ i (h : p i), f i h) = (⨆ x : subtype p, f x x.property) :=
(@supr_subtype _ _ _ p (λ x, f x.val x.property)).symm
lemma supr_subtype'' {ι} (s : set ι) (f : ι → α) :
(⨆ i : s, f i) = ⨆ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ s), f t :=
supr_subtype
lemma is_lub_bsupr {s : set β} {f : β → α} : is_lub (f '' s) (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) :=
by simpa only [range_comp, subtype.range_coe, supr_subtype'] using @is_lub_supr α s _ (f ∘ coe)
theorem infi_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c, by simp only [le_infi_iff, sigma.forall]
theorem supr_sigma {p : β → Type*} {f : sigma p → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩) :=
@infi_sigma αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem infi_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i j, f (i, j)) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c, by simp only [le_infi_iff, prod.forall]
theorem supr_prod {γ : Type*} {f : β × γ → α} : (⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i j, f (i, j)) :=
@infi_prod αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem infi_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨅ x, f x) = (⨅ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊓ (⨅ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ c, by simp only [le_inf_iff, le_infi_iff, sum.forall]
theorem supr_sum {γ : Type*} {f : β ⊕ γ → α} :
(⨆ x, f x) = (⨆ i, f (sum.inl i)) ⊔ (⨆ j, f (sum.inr j)) :=
@infi_sum αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem supr_option (f : option β → α) :
(⨆ o, f o) = f none ⊔ ⨆ b, f (option.some b) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, by simp only [supr_le_iff, sup_le_iff, option.forall]
theorem infi_option (f : option β → α) :
(⨅ o, f o) = f none ⊓ ⨅ b, f (option.some b) :=
@supr_option αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-- A version of `supr_option` useful for rewriting right-to-left. -/
lemma supr_option_elim (a : α) (f : β → α) : (⨆ o : option β, o.elim a f) = a ⊔ ⨆ b, f b :=
by simp [supr_option]
/-- A version of `infi_option` useful for rewriting right-to-left. -/
lemma infi_option_elim (a : α) (f : β → α) : (⨅ o : option β, o.elim a f) = a ⊓ ⨅ b, f b :=
@supr_option_elim αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- When taking the supremum of `f : ι → α`, the elements of `ι` on which `f` gives `⊥` can be
dropped, without changing the result. -/
lemma supr_ne_bot_subtype (f : ι → α) : (⨆ i : {i // f i ≠ ⊥}, f i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
begin
by_cases htriv : ∀ i, f i = ⊥,
{ simp only [htriv, supr_bot] },
refine le_antisymm (supr_comp_le f _) (supr_mono' _),
intros i,
by_cases hi : f i = ⊥,
{ rw hi,
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ := not_forall.mp htriv,
exact ⟨⟨i₀, hi₀⟩, bot_le⟩ },
{ exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, rfl.le⟩ },
end
/-- When taking the infimum of `f : ι → α`, the elements of `ι` on which `f` gives `⊤` can be
dropped, without changing the result. -/
lemma infi_ne_top_subtype (f : ι → α) : (⨅ i : {i // f i ≠ ⊤}, f i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
@supr_ne_bot_subtype αᵒᵈ ι _ f
/-!
### `supr` and `infi` under `ℕ`
-/
lemma supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add {u : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) : (⨆ i ≥ n, u i) = ⨆ i, u (i + n) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm;
simp only [supr_le_iff],
{ exact λ i hi, le_Sup ⟨i - n, by { dsimp only, rw tsub_add_cancel_of_le hi }⟩ },
{ exact λ i, le_Sup ⟨i + n, supr_pos (nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩ }
end
lemma infi_ge_eq_infi_nat_add {u : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) : (⨅ i ≥ n, u i) = ⨅ i, u (i + n) :=
@supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma monotone.supr_nat_add {f : ℕ → α} (hf : monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
(⨆ n, f (n + k)) = ⨆ n, f n :=
le_antisymm (supr_le $ λ i, le_supr _ (i + k)) $ supr_mono $ λ i, hf $ nat.le_add_right i k
@[simp] lemma supr_infi_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
(⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f (i + k)) = ⨆ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i :=
begin
have hf : monotone (λ n, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i) := λ n m h, binfi_mono (λ i, h.trans),
rw ←monotone.supr_nat_add hf k,
{ simp_rw [infi_ge_eq_infi_nat_add, ←nat.add_assoc], },
end
lemma sup_supr_nat_succ (u : ℕ → α) : u 0 ⊔ (⨆ i, u (i + 1)) = ⨆ i, u i :=
begin
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
simp only [sup_le_iff, supr_le_iff],
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, ⟨h _, λ i, h _⟩⟩,
rintro (_|i),
exacts [h.1, h.2 i]
end
lemma inf_infi_nat_succ (u : ℕ → α) : u 0 ⊓ (⨅ i, u (i + 1)) = ⨅ i, u i :=
@sup_supr_nat_succ αᵒᵈ _ u
end
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α]
lemma supr_eq_top (f : ι → α) : supr f = ⊤ ↔ (∀ b <⊤, ∃ i, b < f i) :=
by simp only [← Sup_range, Sup_eq_top, set.exists_range_iff]
lemma infi_eq_bot (f : ι → α) : infi f = ⊥ ↔ (∀ b > ⊥, ∃ i, f i < b) :=
by simp only [← Inf_range, Inf_eq_bot, set.exists_range_iff]
end complete_linear_order
/-!
### Instances
-/
instance Prop.complete_lattice : complete_lattice Prop :=
{ Sup := λ s, ∃ a ∈ s, a,
le_Sup := λ s a h p, ⟨a, h, p⟩,
Sup_le := λ s a h ⟨b, h', p⟩, h b h' p,
Inf := λ s, ∀ a, a ∈ s → a,
Inf_le := λ s a h p, p a h,
le_Inf := λ s a h p b hb, h b hb p,
.. Prop.bounded_order,
.. Prop.distrib_lattice }
noncomputable instance Prop.complete_linear_order : complete_linear_order Prop :=
{ ..Prop.complete_lattice, ..Prop.linear_order }
@[simp] lemma Sup_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Sup s = ∃ p ∈ s, p := rfl
@[simp] lemma Inf_Prop_eq {s : set Prop} : Inf s = ∀ p ∈ s, p := rfl
@[simp] lemma infi_Prop_eq {p : ι → Prop} : (⨅ i, p i) = ∀ i, p i :=
le_antisymm (λ h i, h _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ ) (λ h p ⟨i, eq⟩, eq ▸ h i)
@[simp] lemma supr_Prop_eq {p : ι → Prop} : (⨆ i, p i) = ∃ i, p i :=
le_antisymm (λ ⟨q, ⟨i, (eq : p i = q)⟩, hq⟩, ⟨i, eq.symm ▸ hq⟩) (λ ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨p i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩)
instance pi.has_Sup {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] : has_Sup (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨆ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.has_Inf {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)] : has_Inf (Π i, β i) :=
⟨λ s i, ⨅ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i⟩
instance pi.complete_lattice {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ i, complete_lattice (β i)] :
complete_lattice (Π i, β i) :=
{ Sup := Sup,
Inf := Inf,
le_Sup := λ s f hf i, le_supr (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Inf_le := λ s f hf i, infi_le (λ f : s, (f : Π i, β i) i) ⟨f, hf⟩,
Sup_le := λ s f hf i, supr_le $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
le_Inf := λ s f hf i, le_infi $ λ g, hf g g.2 i,
.. pi.bounded_order,
.. pi.lattice }
lemma Inf_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{s : set (Π a, β a)} {a : α} : (Inf s) a = (⨅ f : s, (f : Π a, β a) a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma infi_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Inf (β i)]
{f : ι → Π a, β a} {a : α} : (⨅ i, f i) a = ⨅ i, f i a :=
by rw [infi, Inf_apply, infi, infi, ← image_eq_range (λ f : Π i, β i, f a) (range f), ← range_comp]
lemma Sup_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)] {s : set (Πa, β a)} {a : α} :
(Sup s) a = (⨆ f : s, (f : Π a, β a) a) :=
rfl
lemma unary_relation_Sup_iff {α : Type*} (s : set (α → Prop)) {a : α} :
Sup s a ↔ ∃ (r : α → Prop), r ∈ s ∧ r a :=
by { change (∃ _, _) ↔ _, simp [-eq_iff_iff] }
lemma binary_relation_Sup_iff {α β : Type*} (s : set (α → β → Prop)) {a : α} {b : β} :
Sup s a b ↔ ∃ (r : α → β → Prop), r ∈ s ∧ r a b :=
by { change (∃ _, _) ↔ _, simp [-eq_iff_iff] }
@[simp] lemma supr_apply {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {ι : Sort*} [Π i, has_Sup (β i)]
{f : ι → Π a, β a} {a : α} : (⨆ i, f i) a = (⨆ i, f i a) :=
@infi_apply α (λ i, (β i)ᵒᵈ) _ _ f a
section complete_lattice
variables [preorder α] [complete_lattice β]
theorem monotone_Sup_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀ f ∈ s, monotone f) : monotone (Sup s) :=
λ x y h, supr_mono $ λ f, m_s f f.2 h
theorem monotone_Inf_of_monotone {s : set (α → β)} (m_s : ∀ f ∈ s, monotone f) : monotone (Inf s) :=
λ x y h, infi_mono $ λ f, m_s f f.2 h
end complete_lattice
namespace prod
variables (α β)
instance [has_Inf α] [has_Inf β] : has_Inf (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Inf (prod.fst '' s), Inf (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [has_Sup α] [has_Sup β] : has_Sup (α × β) :=
⟨λs, (Sup (prod.fst '' s), Sup (prod.snd '' s))⟩
instance [complete_lattice α] [complete_lattice β] : complete_lattice (α × β) :=
{ le_Sup := λ s p hab, ⟨le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, le_Sup $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
Sup_le := λ s p h,
⟨ Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ λ p hp, (h p hp).1,
Sup_le $ ball_image_of_ball $ λ p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
Inf_le := λ s p hab, ⟨Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab, Inf_le $ mem_image_of_mem _ hab⟩,
le_Inf := λ s p h,
⟨ le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ λ p hp, (h p hp).1,
le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ λ p hp, (h p hp).2⟩,
.. prod.lattice α β,
.. prod.bounded_order α β,
.. prod.has_Sup α β,
.. prod.has_Inf α β }
end prod
section complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α] {a : α} {s : set α}
/-- This is a weaker version of `sup_Inf_eq` -/
lemma sup_Inf_le_infi_sup : a ⊔ Inf s ≤ ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b :=
le_infi₂ $ λ i h, sup_le_sup_left (Inf_le h) _
/-- This is a weaker version of `Inf_sup_eq` -/
lemma Inf_sup_le_infi_sup : Inf s ⊔ a ≤ ⨅ b ∈ s, b ⊔ a :=
le_infi₂ $ λ i h, sup_le_sup_right (Inf_le h) _
/-- This is a weaker version of `inf_Sup_eq` -/
lemma supr_inf_le_inf_Sup : (⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b) ≤ a ⊓ Sup s :=
supr₂_le $ λ i h, inf_le_inf_left _ (le_Sup h)
/-- This is a weaker version of `Sup_inf_eq` -/
lemma supr_inf_le_Sup_inf : (⨆ b ∈ s, b ⊓ a) ≤ Sup s ⊓ a :=
supr₂_le $ λ i h, inf_le_inf_right _ (le_Sup h)
lemma disjoint_Sup_left {a : set α} {b : α} (d : disjoint (Sup a) b) {i} (hi : i ∈ a) :
disjoint i b :=
(supr₂_le_iff.1 (supr_inf_le_Sup_inf.trans d) i hi : _)
lemma disjoint_Sup_right {a : set α} {b : α} (d : disjoint b (Sup a)) {i} (hi : i ∈ a) :
disjoint b i :=
(supr₂_le_iff.mp (supr_inf_le_inf_Sup.trans d) i hi : _)
end complete_lattice
/-- Pullback a `complete_lattice` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.complete_lattice [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_Sup α]
[has_Inf α] [has_top α] [has_bot α] [complete_lattice β]
(f : α → β) (hf : function.injective f) (map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
(map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b) (map_Sup : ∀ s, f (Sup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a)
(map_Inf : ∀ s, f (Inf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
complete_lattice α :=
{ Sup := Sup,
le_Sup := λ s a h, (le_supr₂ a h).trans (map_Sup _).ge,
Sup_le := λ s a h, (map_Sup _).trans_le $ supr₂_le h,
Inf := Inf,
Inf_le := λ s a h, (map_Inf _).trans_le $ infi₂_le a h,
le_Inf := λ s a h, (le_infi₂ h).trans (map_Inf _).ge,
-- we cannot use bounded_order.lift here as the `has_le` instance doesn't exist yet
top := ⊤,
le_top := λ a, (@le_top β _ _ _).trans map_top.ge,
bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ a, map_bot.le.trans bot_le,
..hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf }
|
3df0c06ee8c8f3062994ee9e3ded6e89c89d9da7 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/linear_algebra/linear_independent.lean | e8878eca6ff359ca58e9de1ec2ef80fe4b87c5a1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 56,533 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Alexander Bentkamp, Anne Baanen
-/
import linear_algebra.finsupp
import linear_algebra.prod
import data.equiv.fin
import set_theory.cardinal
/-!
# Linear independence
This file defines linear independence in a module or vector space.
It is inspired by Isabelle/HOL's linear algebra, and hence indirectly by HOL Light.
We define `linear_independent R v` as `ker (finsupp.total ι M R v) = ⊥`. Here `finsupp.total` is the
linear map sending a function `f : ι →₀ R` with finite support to the linear combination of vectors
from `v` with these coefficients. Then we prove that several other statements are equivalent to this
one, including injectivity of `finsupp.total ι M R v` and some versions with explicitly written
linear combinations.
## Main definitions
All definitions are given for families of vectors, i.e. `v : ι → M` where `M` is the module or
vector space and `ι : Type*` is an arbitrary indexing type.
* `linear_independent R v` states that the elements of the family `v` are linearly independent.
* `linear_independent.repr hv x` returns the linear combination representing `x : span R (range v)`
on the linearly independent vectors `v`, given `hv : linear_independent R v`
(using classical choice). `linear_independent.repr hv` is provided as a linear map.
## Main statements
We prove several specialized tests for linear independence of families of vectors and of sets of
vectors.
* `fintype.linear_independent_iff`: if `ι` is a finite type, then any function `f : ι → R` has
finite support, so we can reformulate the statement using `∑ i : ι, f i • v i` instead of a sum
over an auxiliary `s : finset ι`;
* `linear_independent_empty_type`: a family indexed by an empty type is linearly independent;
* `linear_independent_unique_iff`: if `ι` is a singleton, then `linear_independent K v` is
equivalent to `v (default ι) ≠ 0`;
* linear_independent_option`, `linear_independent_sum`, `linear_independent_fin_cons`,
`linear_independent_fin_succ`: type-specific tests for linear independence of families of vector
fields;
* `linear_independent_insert`, `linear_independent_union`, `linear_independent_pair`,
`linear_independent_singleton`: linear independence tests for set operations.
In many cases we additionally provide dot-style operations (e.g., `linear_independent.union`) to
make the linear independence tests usable as `hv.insert ha` etc.
We also prove that, when working over a field,
any family of vectors includes a linear independent subfamily spanning the same subspace.
## Implementation notes
We use families instead of sets because it allows us to say that two identical vectors are linearly
dependent.
If you want to use sets, use the family `(λ x, x : s → M)` given a set `s : set M`. The lemmas
`linear_independent.to_subtype_range` and `linear_independent.of_subtype_range` connect those two
worlds.
## Tags
linearly dependent, linear dependence, linearly independent, linear independence
-/
noncomputable theory
open function set submodule
open_locale classical big_operators
universes u
variables {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {R : Type*} {K : Type*}
variables {M : Type*} {M' M'' : Type*} {V : Type u} {V' : Type*}
section module
variables {v : ι → M}
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M'] [add_comm_monoid M'']
variables [module R M] [module R M'] [module R M'']
variables {a b : R} {x y : M}
variables (R) (v)
/-- `linear_independent R v` states the family of vectors `v` is linearly independent over `R`. -/
def linear_independent : Prop := (finsupp.total ι M R v).ker = ⊥
variables {R} {v}
theorem linear_independent_iff : linear_independent R v ↔
∀l, finsupp.total ι M R v l = 0 → l = 0 :=
by simp [linear_independent, linear_map.ker_eq_bot']
theorem linear_independent_iff' : linear_independent R v ↔
∀ s : finset ι, ∀ g : ι → R, ∑ i in s, g i • v i = 0 → ∀ i ∈ s, g i = 0 :=
linear_independent_iff.trans
⟨λ hf s g hg i his, have h : _ := hf (∑ i in s, finsupp.single i (g i)) $
by simpa only [linear_map.map_sum, finsupp.total_single] using hg, calc
g i = (finsupp.lapply i : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] R) (finsupp.single i (g i)) :
by rw [finsupp.lapply_apply, finsupp.single_eq_same]
... = ∑ j in s, (finsupp.lapply i : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] R) (finsupp.single j (g j)) :
eq.symm $ finset.sum_eq_single i
(λ j hjs hji, by rw [finsupp.lapply_apply, finsupp.single_eq_of_ne hji])
(λ hnis, hnis.elim his)
... = (∑ j in s, finsupp.single j (g j)) i : (finsupp.lapply i : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] R).map_sum.symm
... = 0 : finsupp.ext_iff.1 h i,
λ hf l hl, finsupp.ext $ λ i, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hni, hni $ hf _ _ hl _ $
finsupp.mem_support_iff.2 hni⟩
theorem linear_independent_iff'' :
linear_independent R v ↔ ∀ (s : finset ι) (g : ι → R) (hg : ∀ i ∉ s, g i = 0),
∑ i in s, g i • v i = 0 → ∀ i, g i = 0 :=
linear_independent_iff'.trans ⟨λ H s g hg hv i, if his : i ∈ s then H s g hv i his else hg i his,
λ H s g hg i hi, by { convert H s (λ j, if j ∈ s then g j else 0) (λ j hj, if_neg hj)
(by simp_rw [ite_smul, zero_smul, finset.sum_extend_by_zero, hg]) i,
exact (if_pos hi).symm }⟩
theorem linear_dependent_iff : ¬ linear_independent R v ↔
∃ s : finset ι, ∃ g : ι → R, (∑ i in s, g i • v i) = 0 ∧ (∃ i ∈ s, g i ≠ 0) :=
begin
rw linear_independent_iff',
simp only [exists_prop, not_forall],
end
theorem fintype.linear_independent_iff [fintype ι] :
linear_independent R v ↔ ∀ g : ι → R, ∑ i, g i • v i = 0 → ∀ i, g i = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H g, by simpa using linear_independent_iff'.1 H finset.univ g,
λ H, linear_independent_iff''.2 $ λ s g hg hs i, H _ _ _⟩,
rw ← hs,
refine (finset.sum_subset (finset.subset_univ _) (λ i _ hi, _)).symm,
rw [hg i hi, zero_smul]
end
/-- A finite family of vectors `v i` is linear independent iff the linear map that sends
`c : ι → R` to `∑ i, c i • v i` has the trivial kernel. -/
theorem fintype.linear_independent_iff' [fintype ι] :
linear_independent R v ↔
(linear_map.lsum R (λ i : ι, R) ℕ (λ i, linear_map.id.smul_right (v i))).ker = ⊥ :=
by simp [fintype.linear_independent_iff, linear_map.ker_eq_bot', funext_iff]
lemma linear_independent_empty_type [is_empty ι] : linear_independent R v :=
linear_independent_iff.mpr $ λ v hv, subsingleton.elim v 0
lemma linear_independent.ne_zero [nontrivial R]
(i : ι) (hv : linear_independent R v) : v i ≠ 0 :=
λ h, @zero_ne_one R _ _ $ eq.symm begin
suffices : (finsupp.single i 1 : ι →₀ R) i = 0, {simpa},
rw linear_independent_iff.1 hv (finsupp.single i 1),
{ simp },
{ simp [h] }
end
/-- A subfamily of a linearly independent family (i.e., a composition with an injective map) is a
linearly independent family. -/
lemma linear_independent.comp
(h : linear_independent R v) (f : ι' → ι) (hf : injective f) : linear_independent R (v ∘ f) :=
begin
rw [linear_independent_iff, finsupp.total_comp],
intros l hl,
have h_map_domain : ∀ x, (finsupp.map_domain f l) (f x) = 0,
by rw linear_independent_iff.1 h (finsupp.map_domain f l) hl; simp,
ext x,
convert h_map_domain x,
rw [finsupp.map_domain_apply hf]
end
lemma linear_independent.coe_range (i : linear_independent R v) :
linear_independent R (coe : range v → M) :=
by simpa using i.comp _ (range_splitting_injective v)
/-- If `v` is a linearly independent family of vectors and the kernel of a linear map `f` is
disjoint with the submodule spanned by the vectors of `v`, then `f ∘ v` is a linearly independent
family of vectors. See also `linear_independent.map'` for a special case assuming `ker f = ⊥`. -/
lemma linear_independent.map (hv : linear_independent R v) {f : M →ₗ[R] M'}
(hf_inj : disjoint (span R (range v)) f.ker) : linear_independent R (f ∘ v) :=
begin
rw [disjoint, ← set.image_univ, finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total, map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap,
map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_bot, finsupp.supported_univ, top_inf_eq] at hf_inj,
unfold linear_independent at hv ⊢,
rw [hv, le_bot_iff] at hf_inj,
haveI : inhabited M := ⟨0⟩,
rw [finsupp.total_comp, @finsupp.lmap_domain_total _ _ R _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f,
linear_map.ker_comp, hf_inj],
exact λ _, rfl,
end
/-- An injective linear map sends linearly independent families of vectors to linearly independent
families of vectors. See also `linear_independent.map` for a more general statement. -/
lemma linear_independent.map' (hv : linear_independent R v) (f : M →ₗ[R] M')
(hf_inj : f.ker = ⊥) : linear_independent R (f ∘ v) :=
hv.map $ by simp [hf_inj]
/-- If the image of a family of vectors under a linear map is linearly independent, then so is
the original family. -/
lemma linear_independent.of_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (hfv : linear_independent R (f ∘ v)) :
linear_independent R v :=
linear_independent_iff'.2 $ λ s g hg i his,
have ∑ (i : ι) in s, g i • f (v i) = 0,
by simp_rw [← f.map_smul, ← f.map_sum, hg, f.map_zero],
linear_independent_iff'.1 hfv s g this i his
/-- If `f` is an injective linear map, then the family `f ∘ v` is linearly independent
if and only if the family `v` is linearly independent. -/
protected lemma linear_map.linear_independent_iff (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (hf_inj : f.ker = ⊥) :
linear_independent R (f ∘ v) ↔ linear_independent R v :=
⟨λ h, h.of_comp f, λ h, h.map $ by simp only [hf_inj, disjoint_bot_right]⟩
@[nontriviality]
lemma linear_independent_of_subsingleton [subsingleton R] : linear_independent R v :=
linear_independent_iff.2 (λ l hl, subsingleton.elim _ _)
theorem linear_independent_equiv (e : ι ≃ ι') {f : ι' → M} :
linear_independent R (f ∘ e) ↔ linear_independent R f :=
⟨λ h, function.comp.right_id f ▸ e.self_comp_symm ▸ h.comp _ e.symm.injective,
λ h, h.comp _ e.injective⟩
theorem linear_independent_equiv' (e : ι ≃ ι') {f : ι' → M} {g : ι → M} (h : f ∘ e = g) :
linear_independent R g ↔ linear_independent R f :=
h ▸ linear_independent_equiv e
theorem linear_independent_subtype_range {ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : injective f) :
linear_independent R (coe : range f → M) ↔ linear_independent R f :=
iff.symm $ linear_independent_equiv' (equiv.of_injective f hf) rfl
alias linear_independent_subtype_range ↔ linear_independent.of_subtype_range _
theorem linear_independent_image {ι} {s : set ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : set.inj_on f s) :
linear_independent R (λ x : s, f x) ↔ linear_independent R (λ x : f '' s, (x : M)) :=
linear_independent_equiv' (equiv.set.image_of_inj_on _ _ hf) rfl
lemma linear_independent_span (hs : linear_independent R v) :
@linear_independent ι R (span R (range v))
(λ i : ι, ⟨v i, subset_span (mem_range_self i)⟩) _ _ _ :=
linear_independent.of_comp (span R (range v)).subtype hs
/-- See `linear_independent.fin_cons` for a family of elements in a vector space. -/
lemma linear_independent.fin_cons' {m : ℕ} (x : M) (v : fin m → M)
(hli : linear_independent R v)
(x_ortho : (∀ (c : R) (y : submodule.span R (set.range v)), c • x + y = (0 : M) → c = 0)) :
linear_independent R (fin.cons x v : fin m.succ → M) :=
begin
rw fintype.linear_independent_iff at hli ⊢,
rintros g total_eq j,
have zero_not_mem : (0 : fin m.succ) ∉ finset.univ.image (fin.succ : fin m → fin m.succ),
{ rw finset.mem_image,
rintro ⟨x, hx, succ_eq⟩,
exact fin.succ_ne_zero _ succ_eq },
simp only [submodule.coe_mk, fin.univ_succ, finset.sum_insert zero_not_mem,
fin.cons_zero, fin.cons_succ,
forall_true_iff, imp_self, fin.succ_inj, finset.sum_image] at total_eq,
have : g 0 = 0,
{ refine x_ortho (g 0) ⟨∑ (i : fin m), g i.succ • v i, _⟩ total_eq,
exact sum_mem _ (λ i _, smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨i, rfl⟩)) },
refine fin.cases this (λ j, _) j,
apply hli (λ i, g i.succ),
simpa only [this, zero_smul, zero_add] using total_eq
end
/-- A set of linearly independent vectors in a module `M` over a semiring `K` is also linearly
independent over a subring `R` of `K`.
The implementation uses minimal assumptions about the relationship between `R`, `K` and `M`.
The version where `K` is an `R`-algebra is `linear_independent.restrict_scalars_algebras`.
-/
lemma linear_independent.restrict_scalars [semiring K] [smul_with_zero R K] [module K M]
[is_scalar_tower R K M]
(hinj : function.injective (λ r : R, r • (1 : K))) (li : linear_independent K v) :
linear_independent R v :=
begin
refine linear_independent_iff'.mpr (λ s g hg i hi, hinj (eq.trans _ (zero_smul _ _).symm)),
refine (linear_independent_iff'.mp li : _) _ _ _ i hi,
simp_rw [smul_assoc, one_smul],
exact hg,
end
/-- Every finite subset of a linearly independent set is linearly independent. -/
lemma linear_independent_finset_map_embedding_subtype
(s : set M) (li : linear_independent R (coe : s → M)) (t : finset s) :
linear_independent R (coe : (finset.map (embedding.subtype s) t) → M) :=
begin
let f : t.map (embedding.subtype s) → s := λ x, ⟨x.1, begin
obtain ⟨x, h⟩ := x,
rw [finset.mem_map] at h,
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h,
simp only [subtype.coe_prop, embedding.coe_subtype],
end⟩,
convert linear_independent.comp li f _,
rintros ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩,
rw [finset.mem_map] at hx hy,
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hx,
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := hy,
simp only [imp_self, subtype.mk_eq_mk],
end
/--
If every finite set of linearly independent vectors has cardinality at most `n`,
then the same is true for arbitrary sets of linearly independent vectors.
-/
lemma linear_independent_bounded_of_finset_linear_independent_bounded {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : finset M, linear_independent R (λ i : s, (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
∀ s : set M, linear_independent R (coe : s → M) → cardinal.mk s ≤ n :=
begin
intros s li,
apply cardinal.card_le_of,
intro t,
rw ← finset.card_map (embedding.subtype s),
apply H,
apply linear_independent_finset_map_embedding_subtype _ li,
end
section subtype
/-! The following lemmas use the subtype defined by a set in `M` as the index set `ι`. -/
theorem linear_independent_comp_subtype {s : set ι} :
linear_independent R (v ∘ coe : s → M) ↔
∀ l ∈ (finsupp.supported R R s), (finsupp.total ι M R v) l = 0 → l = 0 :=
begin
simp only [linear_independent_iff, (∘), finsupp.mem_supported, finsupp.total_apply,
set.subset_def, finset.mem_coe],
split,
{ intros h l hl₁ hl₂,
have := h (l.subtype_domain s) ((finsupp.sum_subtype_domain_index hl₁).trans hl₂),
exact (finsupp.subtype_domain_eq_zero_iff hl₁).1 this },
{ intros h l hl,
refine finsupp.emb_domain_eq_zero.1 (h (l.emb_domain $ function.embedding.subtype s) _ _),
{ suffices : ∀ i hi, ¬l ⟨i, hi⟩ = 0 → i ∈ s, by simpa,
intros, assumption },
{ rwa [finsupp.emb_domain_eq_map_domain, finsupp.sum_map_domain_index],
exacts [λ _, zero_smul _ _, λ _ _ _, add_smul _ _ _] } }
end
lemma linear_dependent_comp_subtype' {s : set ι} :
¬ linear_independent R (v ∘ coe : s → M) ↔
∃ f : ι →₀ R, f ∈ finsupp.supported R R s ∧ finsupp.total ι M R v f = 0 ∧ f ≠ 0 :=
by simp [linear_independent_comp_subtype]
/-- A version of `linear_dependent_comp_subtype'` with `finsupp.total` unfolded. -/
lemma linear_dependent_comp_subtype {s : set ι} :
¬ linear_independent R (v ∘ coe : s → M) ↔
∃ f : ι →₀ R, f ∈ finsupp.supported R R s ∧ ∑ i in f.support, f i • v i = 0 ∧ f ≠ 0 :=
linear_dependent_comp_subtype'
theorem linear_independent_subtype {s : set M} :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M) ↔
∀ l ∈ (finsupp.supported R R s), (finsupp.total M M R id) l = 0 → l = 0 :=
by apply @linear_independent_comp_subtype _ _ _ id
theorem linear_independent_comp_subtype_disjoint {s : set ι} :
linear_independent R (v ∘ coe : s → M) ↔
disjoint (finsupp.supported R R s) (finsupp.total ι M R v).ker :=
by rw [linear_independent_comp_subtype, linear_map.disjoint_ker]
theorem linear_independent_subtype_disjoint {s : set M} :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M) ↔
disjoint (finsupp.supported R R s) (finsupp.total M M R id).ker :=
by apply @linear_independent_comp_subtype_disjoint _ _ _ id
theorem linear_independent_iff_total_on {s : set M} :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M) ↔ (finsupp.total_on M M R id s).ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [finsupp.total_on, linear_map.ker, linear_map.comap_cod_restrict, map_bot, comap_bot,
linear_map.ker_comp, linear_independent_subtype_disjoint, disjoint, ← map_comap_subtype,
map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_bot, ker_subtype, le_bot_iff]
lemma linear_independent.restrict_of_comp_subtype {s : set ι}
(hs : linear_independent R (v ∘ coe : s → M)) :
linear_independent R (s.restrict v) :=
hs
variables (R M)
lemma linear_independent_empty : linear_independent R (λ x, x : (∅ : set M) → M) :=
by simp [linear_independent_subtype_disjoint]
variables {R M}
lemma linear_independent.mono {t s : set M} (h : t ⊆ s) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M) → linear_independent R (λ x, x : t → M) :=
begin
simp only [linear_independent_subtype_disjoint],
exact (disjoint.mono_left (finsupp.supported_mono h))
end
lemma linear_independent_of_finite (s : set M)
(H : ∀ t ⊆ s, finite t → linear_independent R (λ x, x : t → M)) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M) :=
linear_independent_subtype.2 $
λ l hl, linear_independent_subtype.1 (H _ hl (finset.finite_to_set _)) l (subset.refl _)
lemma linear_independent_Union_of_directed {η : Type*}
{s : η → set M} (hs : directed (⊆) s)
(h : ∀ i, linear_independent R (λ x, x : s i → M)) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : (⋃ i, s i) → M) :=
begin
by_cases hη : nonempty η,
{ resetI,
refine linear_independent_of_finite (⋃ i, s i) (λ t ht ft, _),
rcases finite_subset_Union ft ht with ⟨I, fi, hI⟩,
rcases hs.finset_le fi.to_finset with ⟨i, hi⟩,
exact (h i).mono (subset.trans hI $ bUnion_subset $
λ j hj, hi j (fi.mem_to_finset.2 hj)) },
{ refine (linear_independent_empty _ _).mono _,
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨i, _⟩, _⟩, exact hη ⟨i⟩ }
end
lemma linear_independent_sUnion_of_directed {s : set (set M)}
(hs : directed_on (⊆) s)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, linear_independent R (λ x, x : (a : set M) → M)) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : (⋃₀ s) → M) :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union; exact
linear_independent_Union_of_directed hs.directed_coe (by simpa using h)
lemma linear_independent_bUnion_of_directed {η} {s : set η} {t : η → set M}
(hs : directed_on (t ⁻¹'o (⊆)) s) (h : ∀a∈s, linear_independent R (λ x, x : t a → M)) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : (⋃a∈s, t a) → M) :=
by rw bUnion_eq_Union; exact
linear_independent_Union_of_directed (directed_comp.2 $ hs.directed_coe) (by simpa using h)
end subtype
end module
/-! ### Properties which require `ring R` -/
section module
variables {v : ι → M}
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M'] [add_comm_group M'']
variables [module R M] [module R M'] [module R M'']
variables {a b : R} {x y : M}
theorem linear_independent_iff_injective_total : linear_independent R v ↔
function.injective (finsupp.total ι M R v) :=
linear_independent_iff.trans (finsupp.total ι M R v).to_add_monoid_hom.injective_iff.symm
alias linear_independent_iff_injective_total ↔ linear_independent.injective_total _
lemma linear_independent.injective [nontrivial R] (hv : linear_independent R v) :
injective v :=
begin
intros i j hij,
let l : ι →₀ R := finsupp.single i (1 : R) - finsupp.single j 1,
have h_total : finsupp.total ι M R v l = 0,
{ simp_rw [linear_map.map_sub, finsupp.total_apply],
simp [hij] },
have h_single_eq : finsupp.single i (1 : R) = finsupp.single j 1,
{ rw linear_independent_iff at hv,
simp [eq_add_of_sub_eq' (hv l h_total)] },
simpa [finsupp.single_eq_single_iff] using h_single_eq
end
theorem linear_independent.to_subtype_range {ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : linear_independent R f) :
linear_independent R (coe : range f → M) :=
begin
nontriviality R,
exact (linear_independent_subtype_range hf.injective).2 hf
end
theorem linear_independent.to_subtype_range' {ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : linear_independent R f)
{t} (ht : range f = t) :
linear_independent R (coe : t → M) :=
ht ▸ hf.to_subtype_range
theorem linear_independent.image_of_comp {ι ι'} (s : set ι) (f : ι → ι') (g : ι' → M)
(hs : linear_independent R (λ x : s, g (f x))) :
linear_independent R (λ x : f '' s, g x) :=
begin
nontriviality R,
have : inj_on f s, from inj_on_iff_injective.2 hs.injective.of_comp,
exact (linear_independent_equiv' (equiv.set.image_of_inj_on f s this) rfl).1 hs
end
theorem linear_independent.image {ι} {s : set ι} {f : ι → M}
(hs : linear_independent R (λ x : s, f x)) : linear_independent R (λ x : f '' s, (x : M)) :=
by convert linear_independent.image_of_comp s f id hs
lemma linear_independent.group_smul
{G : Type*} [hG : group G] [distrib_mul_action G R] [distrib_mul_action G M]
[is_scalar_tower G R M] [smul_comm_class G R M] {v : ι → M} (hv : linear_independent R v)
(w : ι → G) : linear_independent R (w • v) :=
begin
rw linear_independent_iff'' at hv ⊢,
intros s g hgs hsum i,
refine (smul_eq_zero_iff_eq (w i)).1 _,
refine hv s (λ i, w i • g i) (λ i hi, _) _ i,
{ dsimp only,
exact (hgs i hi).symm ▸ smul_zero _ },
{ rw [← hsum, finset.sum_congr rfl _],
intros, erw [pi.smul_apply, smul_assoc, smul_comm] },
end
-- This lemma cannot be proved with `linear_independent.group_smul` since the action of
-- `units R` on `R` is not commutative.
lemma linear_independent.units_smul {v : ι → M} (hv : linear_independent R v)
(w : ι → units R) : linear_independent R (w • v) :=
begin
rw linear_independent_iff'' at hv ⊢,
intros s g hgs hsum i,
rw ← (w i).mul_left_eq_zero,
refine hv s (λ i, g i • w i) (λ i hi, _) _ i,
{ dsimp only,
exact (hgs i hi).symm ▸ zero_smul _ _ },
{ rw [← hsum, finset.sum_congr rfl _],
intros,
erw [pi.smul_apply, smul_assoc],
refl }
end
section maximal
universes v w
/--
A linearly independent family is maximal if there is no strictly larger linearly independent family.
-/
@[nolint unused_arguments]
def linear_independent.maximal {ι : Type w} {R : Type u} [semiring R]
{M : Type v} [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] {v : ι → M} (i : linear_independent R v) : Prop :=
∀ (s : set M) (i' : linear_independent R (coe : s → M)) (h : range v ≤ s), range v = s
/--
An alternative characterization of a maximal linearly independent family,
quantifying over types (in the same universe as `M`) into which the indexing family injects.
-/
lemma linear_independent.maximal_iff {ι : Type w} {R : Type u} [ring R] [nontrivial R]
{M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M] {v : ι → M} (i : linear_independent R v) :
i.maximal ↔ ∀ (κ : Type v) (w : κ → M) (i' : linear_independent R w)
(j : ι → κ) (h : w ∘ j = v), surjective j :=
begin
fsplit,
{ rintros p κ w i' j rfl,
specialize p (range w) i'.coe_range (range_comp_subset_range _ _),
rw [range_comp, ←@image_univ _ _ w] at p,
exact range_iff_surjective.mp (image_injective.mpr i'.injective p), },
{ intros p w i' h,
specialize p w (coe : w → M) i'
(λ i, ⟨v i, range_subset_iff.mp h i⟩)
(by { ext, simp, }),
have q := congr_arg (λ s, (coe : w → M) '' s) p.range_eq,
dsimp at q,
rw [←image_univ, image_image] at q,
simpa using q, },
end
end maximal
/-- Linear independent families are injective, even if you multiply either side. -/
lemma linear_independent.eq_of_smul_apply_eq_smul_apply {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{v : ι → M} (li : linear_independent R v) (c d : R) (i j : ι)
(hc : c ≠ 0) (h : c • v i = d • v j) : i = j :=
begin
let l : ι →₀ R := finsupp.single i c - finsupp.single j d,
have h_total : finsupp.total ι M R v l = 0,
{ simp_rw [linear_map.map_sub, finsupp.total_apply],
simp [h] },
have h_single_eq : finsupp.single i c = finsupp.single j d,
{ rw linear_independent_iff at li,
simp [eq_add_of_sub_eq' (li l h_total)] },
rcases (finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _).mp h_single_eq with ⟨this, _⟩ | ⟨hc, _⟩,
{ exact this },
{ contradiction },
end
section subtype
/-! The following lemmas use the subtype defined by a set in `M` as the index set `ι`. -/
lemma linear_independent.disjoint_span_image (hv : linear_independent R v) {s t : set ι}
(hs : disjoint s t) :
disjoint (submodule.span R $ v '' s) (submodule.span R $ v '' t) :=
begin
simp only [disjoint_def, finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total],
rintros _ ⟨l₁, hl₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, hl₂, H⟩,
rw [hv.injective_total.eq_iff] at H, subst l₂,
have : l₁ = 0 := finsupp.disjoint_supported_supported hs (submodule.mem_inf.2 ⟨hl₁, hl₂⟩),
simp [this]
end
lemma linear_independent.not_mem_span_image [nontrivial R] (hv : linear_independent R v) {s : set ι}
{x : ι} (h : x ∉ s) :
v x ∉ submodule.span R (v '' s) :=
begin
have h' : v x ∈ submodule.span R (v '' {x}),
{ rw set.image_singleton,
exact mem_span_singleton_self (v x), },
intro w,
apply linear_independent.ne_zero x hv,
refine disjoint_def.1 (hv.disjoint_span_image _) (v x) h' w,
simpa using h,
end
lemma linear_independent.total_ne_of_not_mem_support [nontrivial R] (hv : linear_independent R v)
{x : ι} (f : ι →₀ R) (h : x ∉ f.support) :
finsupp.total ι M R v f ≠ v x :=
begin
replace h : x ∉ (f.support : set ι) := h,
have p := hv.not_mem_span_image h,
intro w,
rw ←w at p,
rw finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total at p,
simp only [not_exists, not_and, mem_map] at p,
exact p f (f.mem_supported_support R) rfl,
end
lemma linear_independent_sum {v : ι ⊕ ι' → M} :
linear_independent R v ↔ linear_independent R (v ∘ sum.inl) ∧
linear_independent R (v ∘ sum.inr) ∧
disjoint (submodule.span R (range (v ∘ sum.inl))) (submodule.span R (range (v ∘ sum.inr))) :=
begin
rw [range_comp v, range_comp v],
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨h.comp _ sum.inl_injective, h.comp _ sum.inr_injective,
h.disjoint_span_image is_compl_range_inl_range_inr.1⟩, _⟩,
rintro ⟨hl, hr, hlr⟩,
rw [linear_independent_iff'] at *,
intros s g hg i hi,
have : ∑ i in s.preimage sum.inl (sum.inl_injective.inj_on _), (λ x, g x • v x) (sum.inl i) +
∑ i in s.preimage sum.inr (sum.inr_injective.inj_on _), (λ x, g x • v x) (sum.inr i) = 0,
{ rw [finset.sum_preimage', finset.sum_preimage', ← finset.sum_union, ← finset.filter_or],
{ simpa only [← mem_union, range_inl_union_range_inr, mem_univ, finset.filter_true] },
{ exact finset.disjoint_filter.2 (λ x hx, disjoint_left.1 is_compl_range_inl_range_inr.1) } },
{ rw ← eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero at this,
rw [disjoint_def'] at hlr,
have A := hlr _ (sum_mem _ $ λ i hi, _) _ (neg_mem _ $ sum_mem _ $ λ i hi, _) this,
{ cases i with i i,
{ exact hl _ _ A i (finset.mem_preimage.2 hi) },
{ rw [this, neg_eq_zero] at A,
exact hr _ _ A i (finset.mem_preimage.2 hi) } },
{ exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨sum.inl i, mem_range_self _, rfl⟩) },
{ exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨sum.inr i, mem_range_self _, rfl⟩) } }
end
lemma linear_independent.sum_type {v' : ι' → M} (hv : linear_independent R v)
(hv' : linear_independent R v')
(h : disjoint (submodule.span R (range v)) (submodule.span R (range v'))) :
linear_independent R (sum.elim v v') :=
linear_independent_sum.2 ⟨hv, hv', h⟩
lemma linear_independent.union {s t : set M}
(hs : linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M)) (ht : linear_independent R (λ x, x : t → M))
(hst : disjoint (span R s) (span R t)) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : (s ∪ t) → M) :=
(hs.sum_type ht $ by simpa).to_subtype_range' $ by simp
lemma linear_independent_Union_finite_subtype {ι : Type*} {f : ι → set M}
(hl : ∀i, linear_independent R (λ x, x : f i → M))
(hd : ∀i, ∀t:set ι, finite t → i ∉ t → disjoint (span R (f i)) (⨆i∈t, span R (f i))) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : (⋃i, f i) → M) :=
begin
rw [Union_eq_Union_finset f],
apply linear_independent_Union_of_directed,
{ apply directed_of_sup,
exact (λ t₁ t₂ ht, Union_subset_Union $ λ i, Union_subset_Union_const $ λ h, ht h) },
assume t,
induction t using finset.induction_on with i s his ih,
{ refine (linear_independent_empty _ _).mono _,
simp },
{ rw [finset.set_bUnion_insert],
refine (hl _).union ih _,
refine (hd i s s.finite_to_set his).mono_right _,
simp only [(span_Union _).symm],
refine span_mono (@supr_le_supr2 (set M) _ _ _ _ _ _),
exact λ i, ⟨i, le_rfl⟩ }
end
lemma linear_independent_Union_finite {η : Type*} {ιs : η → Type*}
{f : Π j : η, ιs j → M}
(hindep : ∀j, linear_independent R (f j))
(hd : ∀i, ∀t:set η, finite t → i ∉ t →
disjoint (span R (range (f i))) (⨆i∈t, span R (range (f i)))) :
linear_independent R (λ ji : Σ j, ιs j, f ji.1 ji.2) :=
begin
nontriviality R,
apply linear_independent.of_subtype_range,
{ rintros ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ hxy,
by_cases h_cases : x₁ = y₁,
subst h_cases,
{ apply sigma.eq,
rw linear_independent.injective (hindep _) hxy,
refl },
{ have h0 : f x₁ x₂ = 0,
{ apply disjoint_def.1 (hd x₁ {y₁} (finite_singleton y₁)
(λ h, h_cases (eq_of_mem_singleton h))) (f x₁ x₂) (subset_span (mem_range_self _)),
rw supr_singleton,
simp only at hxy,
rw hxy,
exact (subset_span (mem_range_self y₂)) },
exact false.elim ((hindep x₁).ne_zero _ h0) } },
rw range_sigma_eq_Union_range,
apply linear_independent_Union_finite_subtype (λ j, (hindep j).to_subtype_range) hd,
end
end subtype
section repr
variables (hv : linear_independent R v)
/-- Canonical isomorphism between linear combinations and the span of linearly independent vectors.
-/
@[simps] def linear_independent.total_equiv (hv : linear_independent R v) :
(ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] span R (range v) :=
begin
apply linear_equiv.of_bijective
(linear_map.cod_restrict (span R (range v)) (finsupp.total ι M R v) _),
{ rw linear_map.ker_cod_restrict,
apply hv },
{ rw [linear_map.range_eq_map, linear_map.map_cod_restrict, ← linear_map.range_le_iff_comap,
range_subtype, map_top],
rw finsupp.range_total,
apply le_refl (span R (range v)) },
{ intro l,
rw ← finsupp.range_total,
rw linear_map.mem_range,
apply mem_range_self l }
end
/-- Linear combination representing a vector in the span of linearly independent vectors.
Given a family of linearly independent vectors, we can represent any vector in their span as
a linear combination of these vectors. These are provided by this linear map.
It is simply one direction of `linear_independent.total_equiv`. -/
def linear_independent.repr (hv : linear_independent R v) :
span R (range v) →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R := hv.total_equiv.symm
@[simp] lemma linear_independent.total_repr (x) : finsupp.total ι M R v (hv.repr x) = x :=
subtype.ext_iff.1 (linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply hv.total_equiv x)
lemma linear_independent.total_comp_repr :
(finsupp.total ι M R v).comp hv.repr = submodule.subtype _ :=
linear_map.ext $ hv.total_repr
lemma linear_independent.repr_ker : hv.repr.ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [linear_independent.repr, linear_equiv.ker]
lemma linear_independent.repr_range : hv.repr.range = ⊤ :=
by rw [linear_independent.repr, linear_equiv.range]
lemma linear_independent.repr_eq
{l : ι →₀ R} {x} (eq : finsupp.total ι M R v l = ↑x) :
hv.repr x = l :=
begin
have : ↑((linear_independent.total_equiv hv : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] span R (range v)) l)
= finsupp.total ι M R v l := rfl,
have : (linear_independent.total_equiv hv : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] span R (range v)) l = x,
{ rw eq at this,
exact subtype.ext_iff.2 this },
rw ←linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply hv.total_equiv l,
rw ←this,
refl,
end
lemma linear_independent.repr_eq_single (i) (x) (hx : ↑x = v i) :
hv.repr x = finsupp.single i 1 :=
begin
apply hv.repr_eq,
simp [finsupp.total_single, hx]
end
lemma linear_independent.span_repr_eq [nontrivial R] (x) :
span.repr R (set.range v) x = (hv.repr x).equiv_map_domain (equiv.of_injective _ hv.injective) :=
begin
have p : (span.repr R (set.range v) x).equiv_map_domain (equiv.of_injective _ hv.injective).symm =
hv.repr x,
{ apply (linear_independent.total_equiv hv).injective,
ext,
simp, },
ext ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩,
simp [←p],
end
-- TODO: why is this so slow?
lemma linear_independent_iff_not_smul_mem_span :
linear_independent R v ↔ (∀ (i : ι) (a : R), a • (v i) ∈ span R (v '' (univ \ {i})) → a = 0) :=
⟨ λ hv i a ha, begin
rw [finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total, mem_map] at ha,
rcases ha with ⟨l, hl, e⟩,
rw sub_eq_zero.1 (linear_independent_iff.1 hv (l - finsupp.single i a) (by simp [e])) at hl,
by_contra hn,
exact (not_mem_of_mem_diff (hl $ by simp [hn])) (mem_singleton _),
end, λ H, linear_independent_iff.2 $ λ l hl, begin
ext i, simp only [finsupp.zero_apply],
by_contra hn,
refine hn (H i _ _),
refine (finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total _).2 ⟨finsupp.single i (l i) - l, _, _⟩,
{ rw finsupp.mem_supported',
intros j hj,
have hij : j = i :=
not_not.1
(λ hij : j ≠ i, hj ((mem_diff _).2 ⟨mem_univ _, λ h, hij (eq_of_mem_singleton h)⟩)),
simp [hij] },
{ simp [hl] }
end⟩
variable (R)
lemma exists_maximal_independent' (s : ι → M) :
∃ I : set ι, linear_independent R (λ x : I, s x) ∧
∀ J : set ι, I ⊆ J → linear_independent R (λ x : J, s x) → I = J :=
begin
let indep : set ι → Prop := λ I, linear_independent R (s ∘ coe : I → M),
let X := { I : set ι // indep I },
let r : X → X → Prop := λ I J, I.1 ⊆ J.1,
have key : ∀ c : set X, zorn.chain r c → indep (⋃ (I : X) (H : I ∈ c), I),
{ intros c hc,
dsimp [indep],
rw [linear_independent_comp_subtype],
intros f hsupport hsum,
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty c with rfl | ⟨a, hac⟩,
{ simpa using hsupport },
haveI : is_refl X r := ⟨λ _, set.subset.refl _⟩,
obtain ⟨I, I_mem, hI⟩ : ∃ I ∈ c, (f.support : set ι) ⊆ I :=
finset.exists_mem_subset_of_subset_bUnion_of_directed_on hac hc.directed_on hsupport,
exact linear_independent_comp_subtype.mp I.2 f hI hsum },
have trans : transitive r := λ I J K, set.subset.trans,
obtain ⟨⟨I, hli : indep I⟩, hmax : ∀ a, r ⟨I, hli⟩ a → r a ⟨I, hli⟩⟩ :=
@zorn.exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded _ r
(λ c hc, ⟨⟨⋃ I ∈ c, (I : set ι), key c hc⟩, λ I, set.subset_bUnion_of_mem⟩) trans,
exact ⟨I, hli, λ J hsub hli, set.subset.antisymm hsub (hmax ⟨J, hli⟩ hsub)⟩,
end
lemma exists_maximal_independent (s : ι → M) : ∃ I : set ι, linear_independent R (λ x : I, s x) ∧
∀ i ∉ I, ∃ a : R, a ≠ 0 ∧ a • s i ∈ span R (s '' I) :=
begin
classical,
rcases exists_maximal_independent' R s with ⟨I, hIlinind, hImaximal⟩,
use [I, hIlinind],
intros i hi,
specialize hImaximal (I ∪ {i}) (by simp),
set J := I ∪ {i} with hJ,
have memJ : ∀ {x}, x ∈ J ↔ x = i ∨ x ∈ I, by simp [hJ],
have hiJ : i ∈ J := by simp,
have h := mt hImaximal _, swap,
{ intro h2,
rw h2 at hi,
exact absurd hiJ hi },
obtain ⟨f, supp_f, sum_f, f_ne⟩ := linear_dependent_comp_subtype.mp h,
have hfi : f i ≠ 0,
{ contrapose hIlinind,
refine linear_dependent_comp_subtype.mpr ⟨f, _, sum_f, f_ne⟩,
simp only [finsupp.mem_supported, hJ] at ⊢ supp_f,
rintro x hx,
refine (memJ.mp (supp_f hx)).resolve_left _,
rintro rfl,
exact hIlinind (finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp hx) },
use [f i, hfi],
have hfi' : i ∈ f.support := finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr hfi,
rw [← finset.insert_erase hfi', finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_erase _ _),
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at sum_f,
rw sum_f,
refine neg_mem _ (sum_mem _ (λ c hc, smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨c, _, rfl⟩))),
exact (memJ.mp (supp_f (finset.erase_subset _ _ hc))).resolve_left (finset.ne_of_mem_erase hc),
end
end repr
lemma surjective_of_linear_independent_of_span [nontrivial R]
(hv : linear_independent R v) (f : ι' ↪ ι)
(hss : range v ⊆ span R (range (v ∘ f))) :
surjective f :=
begin
intros i,
let repr : (span R (range (v ∘ f)) : Type*) → ι' →₀ R := (hv.comp f f.injective).repr,
let l := (repr ⟨v i, hss (mem_range_self i)⟩).map_domain f,
have h_total_l : finsupp.total ι M R v l = v i,
{ dsimp only [l],
rw finsupp.total_map_domain,
rw (hv.comp f f.injective).total_repr,
{ refl },
{ exact f.injective } },
have h_total_eq : (finsupp.total ι M R v) l = (finsupp.total ι M R v) (finsupp.single i 1),
by rw [h_total_l, finsupp.total_single, one_smul],
have l_eq : l = _ := linear_map.ker_eq_bot.1 hv h_total_eq,
dsimp only [l] at l_eq,
rw ←finsupp.emb_domain_eq_map_domain at l_eq,
rcases finsupp.single_of_emb_domain_single (repr ⟨v i, _⟩) f i (1 : R) zero_ne_one.symm l_eq
with ⟨i', hi'⟩,
use i',
exact hi'.2
end
lemma eq_of_linear_independent_of_span_subtype [nontrivial R] {s t : set M}
(hs : linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M)) (h : t ⊆ s) (hst : s ⊆ span R t) : s = t :=
begin
let f : t ↪ s := ⟨λ x, ⟨x.1, h x.2⟩, λ a b hab, subtype.coe_injective (subtype.mk.inj hab)⟩,
have h_surj : surjective f,
{ apply surjective_of_linear_independent_of_span hs f _,
convert hst; simp [f, comp], },
show s = t,
{ apply subset.antisymm _ h,
intros x hx,
rcases h_surj ⟨x, hx⟩ with ⟨y, hy⟩,
convert y.mem,
rw ← subtype.mk.inj hy,
refl }
end
open linear_map
lemma linear_independent.image_subtype {s : set M} {f : M →ₗ M'}
(hs : linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M))
(hf_inj : disjoint (span R s) f.ker) : linear_independent R (λ x, x : f '' s → M') :=
begin
rw [← @subtype.range_coe _ s] at hf_inj,
refine (hs.map hf_inj).to_subtype_range' _,
simp [set.range_comp f]
end
lemma linear_independent.inl_union_inr {s : set M} {t : set M'}
(hs : linear_independent R (λ x, x : s → M))
(ht : linear_independent R (λ x, x : t → M')) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : inl R M M' '' s ∪ inr R M M' '' t → M × M') :=
begin
refine (hs.image_subtype _).union (ht.image_subtype _) _; [simp, simp, skip],
simp only [span_image],
simp [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod]
end
lemma linear_independent_inl_union_inr' {v : ι → M} {v' : ι' → M'}
(hv : linear_independent R v) (hv' : linear_independent R v') :
linear_independent R (sum.elim (inl R M M' ∘ v) (inr R M M' ∘ v')) :=
(hv.map' (inl R M M') ker_inl).sum_type (hv'.map' (inr R M M') ker_inr) $
begin
refine is_compl_range_inl_inr.disjoint.mono _ _;
simp only [span_le, range_coe, range_comp_subset_range],
end
/-- Dedekind's linear independence of characters -/
-- See, for example, Keith Conrad's note
-- <https://kconrad.math.uconn.edu/blurbs/galoistheory/linearchar.pdf>
theorem linear_independent_monoid_hom (G : Type*) [monoid G] (L : Type*) [comm_ring L]
[no_zero_divisors L] :
@linear_independent _ L (G → L) (λ f, f : (G →* L) → (G → L)) _ _ _ :=
by letI := classical.dec_eq (G →* L);
letI : mul_action L L := distrib_mul_action.to_mul_action;
-- We prove linear independence by showing that only the trivial linear combination vanishes.
exact linear_independent_iff'.2
-- To do this, we use `finset` induction,
(λ s, finset.induction_on s (λ g hg i, false.elim) $ λ a s has ih g hg,
-- Here
-- * `a` is a new character we will insert into the `finset` of characters `s`,
-- * `ih` is the fact that only the trivial linear combination of characters in `s` is zero
-- * `hg` is the fact that `g` are the coefficients of a linear combination summing to zero
-- and it remains to prove that `g` vanishes on `insert a s`.
-- We now make the key calculation:
-- For any character `i` in the original `finset`, we have `g i • i = g i • a` as functions on the
-- monoid `G`.
have h1 : ∀ i ∈ s, (g i • i : G → L) = g i • a, from λ i his, funext $ λ x : G,
-- We prove these expressions are equal by showing
-- the differences of their values on each monoid element `x` is zero
eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ ih (λ j, g j * j x - g j * a x)
(funext $ λ y : G, calc
-- After that, it's just a chase scene.
(∑ i in s, ((g i * i x - g i * a x) • i : G → L)) y
= ∑ i in s, (g i * i x - g i * a x) * i y : finset.sum_apply _ _ _
... = ∑ i in s, (g i * i x * i y - g i * a x * i y) : finset.sum_congr rfl
(λ _ _, sub_mul _ _ _)
... = ∑ i in s, g i * i x * i y - ∑ i in s, g i * a x * i y : finset.sum_sub_distrib
... = (g a * a x * a y + ∑ i in s, g i * i x * i y)
- (g a * a x * a y + ∑ i in s, g i * a x * i y) : by rw add_sub_add_left_eq_sub
... = ∑ i in insert a s, g i * i x * i y - ∑ i in insert a s, g i * a x * i y :
by rw [finset.sum_insert has, finset.sum_insert has]
... = ∑ i in insert a s, g i * i (x * y) - ∑ i in insert a s, a x * (g i * i y) :
congr (congr_arg has_sub.sub (finset.sum_congr rfl $ λ i _, by rw [i.map_mul, mul_assoc]))
(finset.sum_congr rfl $ λ _ _, by rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm])
... = (∑ i in insert a s, (g i • i : G → L)) (x * y)
- a x * (∑ i in insert a s, (g i • i : G → L)) y :
by rw [finset.sum_apply, finset.sum_apply, finset.mul_sum]; refl
... = 0 - a x * 0 : by rw hg; refl
... = 0 : by rw [mul_zero, sub_zero])
i
his,
-- On the other hand, since `a` is not already in `s`, for any character `i ∈ s`
-- there is some element of the monoid on which it differs from `a`.
have h2 : ∀ i : G →* L, i ∈ s → ∃ y, i y ≠ a y, from λ i his,
classical.by_contradiction $ λ h,
have hia : i = a, from monoid_hom.ext $ λ y, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hy, h ⟨y, hy⟩,
has $ hia ▸ his,
-- From these two facts we deduce that `g` actually vanishes on `s`,
have h3 : ∀ i ∈ s, g i = 0, from λ i his, let ⟨y, hy⟩ := h2 i his in
have h : g i • i y = g i • a y, from congr_fun (h1 i his) y,
or.resolve_right (mul_eq_zero.1 $ by rw [mul_sub, sub_eq_zero]; exact h) (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hy),
-- And so, using the fact that the linear combination over `s` and over `insert a s` both vanish,
-- we deduce that `g a = 0`.
have h4 : g a = 0, from calc
g a = g a * 1 : (mul_one _).symm
... = (g a • a : G → L) 1 : by rw ← a.map_one; refl
... = (∑ i in insert a s, (g i • i : G → L)) 1 : begin
rw finset.sum_eq_single a,
{ intros i his hia, rw finset.mem_insert at his,
rw [h3 i (his.resolve_left hia), zero_smul] },
{ intros haas, exfalso, apply haas, exact finset.mem_insert_self a s }
end
... = 0 : by rw hg; refl,
-- Now we're done; the last two facts together imply that `g` vanishes on every element
-- of `insert a s`.
(finset.forall_mem_insert _ _ _).2 ⟨h4, h3⟩)
lemma le_of_span_le_span [nontrivial R] {s t u: set M}
(hl : linear_independent R (coe : u → M )) (hsu : s ⊆ u) (htu : t ⊆ u)
(hst : span R s ≤ span R t) : s ⊆ t :=
begin
have := eq_of_linear_independent_of_span_subtype
(hl.mono (set.union_subset hsu htu))
(set.subset_union_right _ _)
(set.union_subset (set.subset.trans subset_span hst) subset_span),
rw ← this, apply set.subset_union_left
end
lemma span_le_span_iff [nontrivial R] {s t u: set M}
(hl : linear_independent R (coe : u → M)) (hsu : s ⊆ u) (htu : t ⊆ u) :
span R s ≤ span R t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨le_of_span_le_span hl hsu htu, span_mono⟩
end module
section nontrivial
variables [ring R] [nontrivial R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M']
variables [module R M] [no_zero_smul_divisors R M] [module R M']
variables {v : ι → M} {s t : set M} {x y z : M}
lemma linear_independent_unique_iff
(v : ι → M) [unique ι] :
linear_independent R v ↔ v (default ι) ≠ 0 :=
begin
simp only [linear_independent_iff, finsupp.total_unique, smul_eq_zero],
refine ⟨λ h hv, _, λ hv l hl, finsupp.unique_ext $ hl.resolve_right hv⟩,
have := h (finsupp.single (default ι) 1) (or.inr hv),
exact one_ne_zero (finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 this)
end
alias linear_independent_unique_iff ↔ _ linear_independent_unique
lemma linear_independent_singleton {x : M} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
linear_independent R (λ x, x : ({x} : set M) → M) :=
linear_independent_unique coe hx
end nontrivial
/-!
### Properties which require `division_ring K`
These can be considered generalizations of properties of linear independence in vector spaces.
-/
section module
variables [division_ring K] [add_comm_group V] [add_comm_group V']
variables [module K V] [module K V']
variables {v : ι → V} {s t : set V} {x y z : V}
open submodule
/- TODO: some of the following proofs can generalized with a zero_ne_one predicate type class
(instead of a data containing type class) -/
lemma mem_span_insert_exchange : x ∈ span K (insert y s) → x ∉ span K s → y ∈ span K (insert x s) :=
begin
simp [mem_span_insert],
rintro a z hz rfl h,
refine ⟨a⁻¹, -a⁻¹ • z, smul_mem _ _ hz, _⟩,
have a0 : a ≠ 0, {rintro rfl, simp * at *},
simp [a0, smul_add, smul_smul]
end
lemma linear_independent_iff_not_mem_span :
linear_independent K v ↔ (∀i, v i ∉ span K (v '' (univ \ {i}))) :=
begin
apply linear_independent_iff_not_smul_mem_span.trans,
split,
{ intros h i h_in_span,
apply one_ne_zero (h i 1 (by simp [h_in_span])) },
{ intros h i a ha,
by_contradiction ha',
exact false.elim (h _ ((smul_mem_iff _ ha').1 ha)) }
end
lemma linear_independent.insert (hs : linear_independent K (λ b, b : s → V)) (hx : x ∉ span K s) :
linear_independent K (λ b, b : insert x s → V) :=
begin
rw ← union_singleton,
have x0 : x ≠ 0 := mt (by rintro rfl; apply zero_mem _) hx,
apply hs.union (linear_independent_singleton x0),
rwa [disjoint_span_singleton' x0]
end
lemma linear_independent_option' :
linear_independent K (λ o, option.cases_on' o x v : option ι → V) ↔
linear_independent K v ∧ (x ∉ submodule.span K (range v)) :=
begin
rw [← linear_independent_equiv (equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit ι).symm, linear_independent_sum,
@range_unique _ punit, @linear_independent_unique_iff punit, disjoint_span_singleton],
dsimp [(∘)],
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨h.1, λ hx, h.2.1 $ h.2.2 hx⟩, λ h, ⟨h.1, _, λ hx, (h.2 hx).elim⟩⟩,
rintro rfl,
exact h.2 (zero_mem _)
end
lemma linear_independent.option (hv : linear_independent K v)
(hx : x ∉ submodule.span K (range v)) :
linear_independent K (λ o, option.cases_on' o x v : option ι → V) :=
linear_independent_option'.2 ⟨hv, hx⟩
lemma linear_independent_option {v : option ι → V} :
linear_independent K v ↔
linear_independent K (v ∘ coe : ι → V) ∧ v none ∉ submodule.span K (range (v ∘ coe : ι → V)) :=
by simp only [← linear_independent_option', option.cases_on'_none_coe]
theorem linear_independent_insert' {ι} {s : set ι} {a : ι} {f : ι → V} (has : a ∉ s) :
linear_independent K (λ x : insert a s, f x) ↔
linear_independent K (λ x : s, f x) ∧ f a ∉ submodule.span K (f '' s) :=
by { rw [← linear_independent_equiv ((equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit _).trans
(equiv.set.insert has).symm), linear_independent_option], simp [(∘), range_comp f] }
theorem linear_independent_insert (hxs : x ∉ s) :
linear_independent K (λ b : insert x s, (b : V)) ↔
linear_independent K (λ b : s, (b : V)) ∧ x ∉ submodule.span K s :=
(@linear_independent_insert' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ id hxs).trans $ by simp
lemma linear_independent_pair {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : ∀ a : K, a • x ≠ y) :
linear_independent K (coe : ({x, y} : set V) → V) :=
pair_comm y x ▸ (linear_independent_singleton hx).insert $ mt mem_span_singleton.1
(not_exists.2 hy)
lemma linear_independent_fin_cons {n} {v : fin n → V} :
linear_independent K (fin.cons x v : fin (n + 1) → V) ↔
linear_independent K v ∧ x ∉ submodule.span K (range v) :=
begin
rw [← linear_independent_equiv (fin_succ_equiv n).symm, linear_independent_option],
convert iff.rfl,
{ ext,
-- TODO: why doesn't simp use `fin_succ_equiv_symm_coe` here?
rw [comp_app, comp_app, fin_succ_equiv_symm_coe, fin.cons_succ] },
{ rw [comp_app, fin_succ_equiv_symm_none, fin.cons_zero] },
{ ext,
rw [comp_app, comp_app, fin_succ_equiv_symm_coe, fin.cons_succ] }
end
lemma linear_independent_fin_snoc {n} {v : fin n → V} :
linear_independent K (fin.snoc v x : fin (n + 1) → V) ↔
linear_independent K v ∧ x ∉ submodule.span K (range v) :=
by rw [fin.snoc_eq_cons_rotate, linear_independent_equiv, linear_independent_fin_cons]
/-- See `linear_independent.fin_cons'` for an uglier version that works if you
only have a module over a semiring. -/
lemma linear_independent.fin_cons {n} {v : fin n → V} (hv : linear_independent K v)
(hx : x ∉ submodule.span K (range v)) :
linear_independent K (fin.cons x v : fin (n + 1) → V) :=
linear_independent_fin_cons.2 ⟨hv, hx⟩
lemma linear_independent_fin_succ {n} {v : fin (n + 1) → V} :
linear_independent K v ↔
linear_independent K (fin.tail v) ∧ v 0 ∉ submodule.span K (range $ fin.tail v) :=
by rw [← linear_independent_fin_cons, fin.cons_self_tail]
lemma linear_independent_fin_succ' {n} {v : fin (n + 1) → V} :
linear_independent K v ↔
linear_independent K (fin.init v) ∧ v (fin.last _) ∉ submodule.span K (range $ fin.init v) :=
by rw [← linear_independent_fin_snoc, fin.snoc_init_self]
lemma linear_independent_fin2 {f : fin 2 → V} :
linear_independent K f ↔ f 1 ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a : K, a • f 1 ≠ f 0 :=
by rw [linear_independent_fin_succ, linear_independent_unique_iff, range_unique,
mem_span_singleton, not_exists,
show fin.tail f (default (fin 1)) = f 1, by rw ← fin.succ_zero_eq_one; refl]
lemma exists_linear_independent (hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V)) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
∃b⊆t, s ⊆ b ∧ t ⊆ span K b ∧ linear_independent K (λ x, x : b → V) :=
begin
rcases zorn.zorn_subset_nonempty {b | b ⊆ t ∧ linear_independent K (λ x, x : b → V)} _ _
⟨hst, hs⟩ with ⟨b, ⟨bt, bi⟩, sb, h⟩,
{ refine ⟨b, bt, sb, λ x xt, _, bi⟩,
by_contra hn,
apply hn,
rw ← h _ ⟨insert_subset.2 ⟨xt, bt⟩, bi.insert hn⟩ (subset_insert _ _),
exact subset_span (mem_insert _ _) },
{ refine λ c hc cc c0, ⟨⋃₀ c, ⟨_, _⟩, λ x, _⟩,
{ exact sUnion_subset (λ x xc, (hc xc).1) },
{ exact linear_independent_sUnion_of_directed cc.directed_on (λ x xc, (hc xc).2) },
{ exact subset_sUnion_of_mem } }
end
/-- `linear_independent.extend` adds vectors to a linear independent set `s ⊆ t` until it spans
all elements of `t`. -/
noncomputable def linear_independent.extend (hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V))
(hst : s ⊆ t) : set V :=
classical.some (exists_linear_independent hs hst)
lemma linear_independent.extend_subset (hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V))
(hst : s ⊆ t) : hs.extend hst ⊆ t :=
let ⟨hbt, hsb, htb, hli⟩ := classical.some_spec (exists_linear_independent hs hst) in hbt
lemma linear_independent.subset_extend (hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V))
(hst : s ⊆ t) : s ⊆ hs.extend hst :=
let ⟨hbt, hsb, htb, hli⟩ := classical.some_spec (exists_linear_independent hs hst) in hsb
lemma linear_independent.subset_span_extend (hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V))
(hst : s ⊆ t) : t ⊆ span K (hs.extend hst) :=
let ⟨hbt, hsb, htb, hli⟩ := classical.some_spec (exists_linear_independent hs hst) in htb
lemma linear_independent.linear_independent_extend (hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V))
(hst : s ⊆ t) : linear_independent K (coe : hs.extend hst → V) :=
let ⟨hbt, hsb, htb, hli⟩ := classical.some_spec (exists_linear_independent hs hst) in hli
variables {K V}
-- TODO(Mario): rewrite?
lemma exists_of_linear_independent_of_finite_span {t : finset V}
(hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V)) (hst : s ⊆ (span K ↑t : submodule K V)) :
∃t':finset V, ↑t' ⊆ s ∪ ↑t ∧ s ⊆ ↑t' ∧ t'.card = t.card :=
have ∀t, ∀(s' : finset V), ↑s' ⊆ s → s ∩ ↑t = ∅ → s ⊆ (span K ↑(s' ∪ t) : submodule K V) →
∃t':finset V, ↑t' ⊆ s ∪ ↑t ∧ s ⊆ ↑t' ∧ t'.card = (s' ∪ t).card :=
assume t, finset.induction_on t
(assume s' hs' _ hss',
have s = ↑s',
from eq_of_linear_independent_of_span_subtype hs hs' $
by simpa using hss',
⟨s', by simp [this]⟩)
(assume b₁ t hb₁t ih s' hs' hst hss',
have hb₁s : b₁ ∉ s,
from assume h,
have b₁ ∈ s ∩ ↑(insert b₁ t), from ⟨h, finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩,
by rwa [hst] at this,
have hb₁s' : b₁ ∉ s', from assume h, hb₁s $ hs' h,
have hst : s ∩ ↑t = ∅,
from eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ subset.trans
(by simp [inter_subset_inter, subset.refl]) (le_of_eq hst),
classical.by_cases
(assume : s ⊆ (span K ↑(s' ∪ t) : submodule K V),
let ⟨u, hust, hsu, eq⟩ := ih _ hs' hst this in
have hb₁u : b₁ ∉ u, from assume h, (hust h).elim hb₁s hb₁t,
⟨insert b₁ u, by simp [insert_subset_insert hust],
subset.trans hsu (by simp), by simp [eq, hb₁t, hb₁s', hb₁u]⟩)
(assume : ¬ s ⊆ (span K ↑(s' ∪ t) : submodule K V),
let ⟨b₂, hb₂s, hb₂t⟩ := not_subset.mp this in
have hb₂t' : b₂ ∉ s' ∪ t, from assume h, hb₂t $ subset_span h,
have s ⊆ (span K ↑(insert b₂ s' ∪ t) : submodule K V), from
assume b₃ hb₃,
have ↑(s' ∪ insert b₁ t) ⊆ insert b₁ (insert b₂ ↑(s' ∪ t) : set V),
by simp [insert_eq, -singleton_union, -union_singleton, union_subset_union, subset.refl,
subset_union_right],
have hb₃ : b₃ ∈ span K (insert b₁ (insert b₂ ↑(s' ∪ t) : set V)),
from span_mono this (hss' hb₃),
have s ⊆ (span K (insert b₁ ↑(s' ∪ t)) : submodule K V),
by simpa [insert_eq, -singleton_union, -union_singleton] using hss',
have hb₁ : b₁ ∈ span K (insert b₂ ↑(s' ∪ t)),
from mem_span_insert_exchange (this hb₂s) hb₂t,
by rw [span_insert_eq_span hb₁] at hb₃; simpa using hb₃,
let ⟨u, hust, hsu, eq⟩ := ih _ (by simp [insert_subset, hb₂s, hs']) hst this in
⟨u, subset.trans hust $ union_subset_union (subset.refl _) (by simp [subset_insert]),
hsu, by simp [eq, hb₂t', hb₁t, hb₁s']⟩)),
begin
have eq : t.filter (λx, x ∈ s) ∪ t.filter (λx, x ∉ s) = t,
{ ext1 x,
by_cases x ∈ s; simp * },
apply exists.elim (this (t.filter (λx, x ∉ s)) (t.filter (λx, x ∈ s))
(by simp [set.subset_def]) (by simp [set.ext_iff] {contextual := tt}) (by rwa [eq])),
intros u h,
exact ⟨u, subset.trans h.1 (by simp [subset_def, and_imp, or_imp_distrib] {contextual:=tt}),
h.2.1, by simp only [h.2.2, eq]⟩
end
lemma exists_finite_card_le_of_finite_of_linear_independent_of_span
(ht : finite t) (hs : linear_independent K (λ x, x : s → V)) (hst : s ⊆ span K t) :
∃h : finite s, h.to_finset.card ≤ ht.to_finset.card :=
have s ⊆ (span K ↑(ht.to_finset) : submodule K V), by simp; assumption,
let ⟨u, hust, hsu, eq⟩ := exists_of_linear_independent_of_finite_span hs this in
have finite s, from u.finite_to_set.subset hsu,
⟨this, by rw [←eq]; exact (finset.card_le_of_subset $ finset.coe_subset.mp $ by simp [hsu])⟩
end module
|
ff1d9a7223933a71d8e9dc07dc49b2e701dd9848 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/group_theory/subgroup.lean | 5a576958413f8aa59b083900e71e4a5e8e7dc2ae | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,236 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Rowett, Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro,
Michael Howes
-/
import group_theory.submonoid
open set function
variables {G : Type*} {H : Type*} {A : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b c: G}
section group
variables [group G] [add_group A]
@[to_additive]
lemma injective_mul {a : G} : injective ((*) a) :=
assume a₁ a₂ h,
have a⁻¹ * a * a₁ = a⁻¹ * a * a₂, by rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, h],
by rwa [inv_mul_self, one_mul, one_mul] at this
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- `s` is an additive subgroup: a set containing 0 and closed under addition and negation. -/
class is_add_subgroup (s : set A) extends is_add_submonoid s : Prop :=
(neg_mem {a} : a ∈ s → -a ∈ s)
/-- `s` is a subgroup: a set containing 1 and closed under multiplication and inverse. -/
@[to_additive is_add_subgroup]
class is_subgroup (s : set G) extends is_submonoid s : Prop :=
(inv_mem {a} : a ∈ s → a⁻¹ ∈ s)
end prio
lemma additive.is_add_subgroup
(s : set G) [is_subgroup s] : @is_add_subgroup (additive G) _ s :=
@is_add_subgroup.mk (additive G) _ _ (additive.is_add_submonoid _)
(@is_subgroup.inv_mem _ _ _ _)
theorem additive.is_add_subgroup_iff
{s : set G} : @is_add_subgroup (additive G) _ s ↔ is_subgroup s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩; exact @is_subgroup.mk G _ _ ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩ @h₃,
λ h, by exactI additive.is_add_subgroup _⟩
lemma multiplicative.is_subgroup
(s : set A) [is_add_subgroup s] : @is_subgroup (multiplicative A) _ s :=
@is_subgroup.mk (multiplicative A) _ _ (multiplicative.is_submonoid _)
(@is_add_subgroup.neg_mem _ _ _ _)
theorem multiplicative.is_subgroup_iff
{s : set A} : @is_subgroup (multiplicative A) _ s ↔ is_add_subgroup s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩; exact @is_add_subgroup.mk A _ _ ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩ @h₃,
λ h, by exactI multiplicative.is_subgroup _⟩
@[to_additive add_group]
instance subtype.group {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] : group s :=
{ inv := λ x, ⟨(x:G)⁻¹, is_subgroup.inv_mem x.2⟩,
mul_left_inv := λ x, subtype.eq $ mul_left_inv x.1,
.. subtype.monoid }
@[to_additive add_comm_group]
instance subtype.comm_group {G : Type*} [comm_group G] {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] : comm_group s :=
{ .. subtype.group, .. subtype.comm_monoid }
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive]
lemma is_subgroup.coe_inv {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] (a : s) : ((a⁻¹ : s) : G) = a⁻¹ := rfl
attribute [norm_cast] is_add_subgroup.coe_neg
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma is_subgroup.coe_gpow {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] (a : s) (n : ℤ) : ((a ^ n : s) : G) = a ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [is_submonoid.coe_pow a]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma is_add_subgroup.gsmul_coe {s : set A} [is_add_subgroup s] (a : s) (n : ℤ) :
((gsmul n a : s) : A) = gsmul n a :=
by induction n; simp [is_add_submonoid.smul_coe a]
attribute [to_additive gsmul_coe] is_subgroup.coe_gpow
@[to_additive of_add_neg]
theorem is_subgroup.of_div (s : set G)
(one_mem : (1:G) ∈ s) (div_mem : ∀{a b:G}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a * b⁻¹ ∈ s) :
is_subgroup s :=
have inv_mem : ∀a, a ∈ s → a⁻¹ ∈ s, from
assume a ha,
have 1 * a⁻¹ ∈ s, from div_mem one_mem ha,
by simpa,
{ inv_mem := inv_mem,
mul_mem := assume a b ha hb,
have a * b⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ s, from div_mem ha (inv_mem b hb),
by simpa,
one_mem := one_mem }
theorem is_add_subgroup.of_sub (s : set A)
(zero_mem : (0:A) ∈ s) (sub_mem : ∀{a b:A}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a - b ∈ s) :
is_add_subgroup s :=
is_add_subgroup.of_add_neg s zero_mem (λ x y hx hy, sub_mem hx hy)
@[to_additive]
instance is_subgroup.inter (s₁ s₂ : set G) [is_subgroup s₁] [is_subgroup s₂] :
is_subgroup (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
{ inv_mem := λ x hx, ⟨is_subgroup.inv_mem hx.1, is_subgroup.inv_mem hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive]
instance is_subgroup.Inter {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → set G) [h : ∀ y : ι, is_subgroup (s y)] :
is_subgroup (set.Inter s) :=
{ inv_mem := λ x h, set.mem_Inter.2 $ λ y, is_subgroup.inv_mem (set.mem_Inter.1 h y) }
@[to_additive is_add_subgroup_Union_of_directed]
lemma is_subgroup_Union_of_directed {ι : Type*} [hι : nonempty ι]
(s : ι → set G) [∀ i, is_subgroup (s i)]
(directed : ∀ i j, ∃ k, s i ⊆ s k ∧ s j ⊆ s k) :
is_subgroup (⋃i, s i) :=
{ inv_mem := λ a ha,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := set.mem_Union.1 ha in
set.mem_Union.2 ⟨i, is_subgroup.inv_mem hi⟩,
to_is_submonoid := is_submonoid_Union_of_directed s directed }
def gpowers (x : G) : set G := set.range ((^) x : ℤ → G)
def gmultiples (x : A) : set A := set.range (λ i, gsmul i x)
attribute [to_additive gmultiples] gpowers
instance gpowers.is_subgroup (x : G) : is_subgroup (gpowers x) :=
{ one_mem := ⟨(0:ℤ), by simp⟩,
mul_mem := assume x₁ x₂ ⟨i₁, h₁⟩ ⟨i₂, h₂⟩, ⟨i₁ + i₂, by simp [gpow_add, *]⟩,
inv_mem := assume x₀ ⟨i, h⟩, ⟨-i, by simp [h.symm]⟩ }
instance gmultiples.is_add_subgroup (x : A) : is_add_subgroup (gmultiples x) :=
multiplicative.is_subgroup_iff.1 $ gpowers.is_subgroup _
attribute [to_additive is_add_subgroup] gpowers.is_subgroup
lemma is_subgroup.gpow_mem {a : G} {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] (h : a ∈ s) : ∀{i:ℤ}, a ^ i ∈ s
| (n : ℕ) := is_submonoid.pow_mem h
| -[1+ n] := is_subgroup.inv_mem (is_submonoid.pow_mem h)
lemma is_add_subgroup.gsmul_mem {a : A} {s : set A} [is_add_subgroup s] : a ∈ s → ∀{i:ℤ}, gsmul i a ∈ s :=
@is_subgroup.gpow_mem (multiplicative A) _ _ _ (multiplicative.is_subgroup _)
lemma gpowers_subset {a : G} {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] (h : a ∈ s) : gpowers a ⊆ s :=
λ x hx, match x, hx with _, ⟨i, rfl⟩ := is_subgroup.gpow_mem h end
lemma gmultiples_subset {a : A} {s : set A} [is_add_subgroup s] (h : a ∈ s) : gmultiples a ⊆ s :=
@gpowers_subset (multiplicative A) _ _ _ (multiplicative.is_subgroup _) h
attribute [to_additive gmultiples_subset] gpowers_subset
lemma mem_gpowers {a : G} : a ∈ gpowers a := ⟨1, by simp⟩
lemma mem_gmultiples {a : A} : a ∈ gmultiples a := ⟨1, by simp⟩
attribute [to_additive mem_gmultiples] mem_gpowers
end group
namespace is_subgroup
open is_submonoid
variables [group G] (s : set G) [is_subgroup s]
@[to_additive]
lemma inv_mem_iff : a⁻¹ ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using inv_mem h, inv_mem⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_cancel_left (h : a ∈ s) : b * a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ s :=
⟨λ hba, by simpa using mul_mem hba (inv_mem h), λ hb, mul_mem hb h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_cancel_right (h : a ∈ s) : a * b ∈ s ↔ b ∈ s :=
⟨λ hab, by simpa using mul_mem (inv_mem h) hab, mul_mem h⟩
end is_subgroup
theorem is_add_subgroup.sub_mem {A} [add_group A] (s : set A) [is_add_subgroup s] (a b : A)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : a - b ∈ s :=
is_add_submonoid.add_mem ha (is_add_subgroup.neg_mem hb)
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
class normal_add_subgroup [add_group A] (s : set A) extends is_add_subgroup s : Prop :=
(normal : ∀ n ∈ s, ∀ g : A, g + n - g ∈ s)
@[to_additive normal_add_subgroup]
class normal_subgroup [group G] (s : set G) extends is_subgroup s : Prop :=
(normal : ∀ n ∈ s, ∀ g : G, g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ s)
end prio
@[to_additive normal_add_subgroup_of_add_comm_group]
lemma normal_subgroup_of_comm_group [comm_group G] (s : set G) [hs : is_subgroup s] :
normal_subgroup s :=
{ normal := λ n hn g, by rwa [mul_right_comm, mul_right_inv, one_mul],
..hs }
lemma additive.normal_add_subgroup [group G]
(s : set G) [normal_subgroup s] : @normal_add_subgroup (additive G) _ s :=
@normal_add_subgroup.mk (additive G) _ _
(@additive.is_add_subgroup G _ _ _)
(@normal_subgroup.normal _ _ _ _)
theorem additive.normal_add_subgroup_iff [group G]
{s : set G} : @normal_add_subgroup (additive G) _ s ↔ normal_subgroup s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; exact
@normal_subgroup.mk G _ _ (additive.is_add_subgroup_iff.1 h₁) @h₂,
λ h, by exactI additive.normal_add_subgroup _⟩
lemma multiplicative.normal_subgroup [add_group A]
(s : set A) [normal_add_subgroup s] : @normal_subgroup (multiplicative A) _ s :=
@normal_subgroup.mk (multiplicative A) _ _
(@multiplicative.is_subgroup A _ _ _)
(@normal_add_subgroup.normal _ _ _ _)
theorem multiplicative.normal_subgroup_iff [add_group A]
{s : set A} : @normal_subgroup (multiplicative A) _ s ↔ normal_add_subgroup s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; exact
@normal_add_subgroup.mk A _ _ (multiplicative.is_subgroup_iff.1 h₁) @h₂,
λ h, by exactI multiplicative.normal_subgroup _⟩
namespace is_subgroup
variable [group G]
-- Normal subgroup properties
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_norm_comm {s : set G} [normal_subgroup s] {a b : G} (hab : a * b ∈ s) : b * a ∈ s :=
have h : a⁻¹ * (a * b) * a⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ s, from normal_subgroup.normal (a * b) hab a⁻¹,
by simp at h; exact h
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_norm_comm_iff {s : set G} [normal_subgroup s] {a b : G} : a * b ∈ s ↔ b * a ∈ s :=
⟨mem_norm_comm, mem_norm_comm⟩
/-- The trivial subgroup -/
@[to_additive]
def trivial (G : Type*) [group G] : set G := {1}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_trivial {g : G} : g ∈ trivial G ↔ g = 1 :=
mem_singleton_iff
@[to_additive]
instance trivial_normal : normal_subgroup (trivial G) :=
by refine {..}; simp [trivial] {contextual := tt}
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_trivial_iff {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] :
s = trivial G ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, x = (1 : G)) :=
by simp only [set.ext_iff, is_subgroup.mem_trivial];
exact ⟨λ h x, (h x).1, λ h x, ⟨h x, λ hx, hx.symm ▸ is_submonoid.one_mem⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
instance univ_subgroup : normal_subgroup (@univ G) :=
by refine {..}; simp
@[to_additive add_center]
def center (G : Type*) [group G] : set G := {z | ∀ g, g * z = z * g}
@[to_additive mem_add_center]
lemma mem_center {a : G} : a ∈ center G ↔ ∀g, g * a = a * g := iff.rfl
@[to_additive add_center_normal]
instance center_normal : normal_subgroup (center G) :=
{ one_mem := by simp [center],
mul_mem := assume a b ha hb g,
by rw [←mul_assoc, mem_center.2 ha g, mul_assoc, mem_center.2 hb g, ←mul_assoc],
inv_mem := assume a ha g,
calc
g * a⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (g * a) * a⁻¹ : by simp [ha g]
... = a⁻¹ * g : by rw [←mul_assoc, mul_assoc]; simp,
normal := assume n ha g h,
calc
h * (g * n * g⁻¹) = h * n : by simp [ha g, mul_assoc]
... = g * g⁻¹ * n * h : by rw ha h; simp
... = g * n * g⁻¹ * h : by rw [mul_assoc g, ha g⁻¹, ←mul_assoc] }
@[to_additive add_normalizer]
def normalizer (s : set G) : set G :=
{g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ s}
@[to_additive normalizer_is_add_subgroup]
instance normalizer_is_subgroup (s : set G) : is_subgroup (normalizer s) :=
{ one_mem := by simp [normalizer],
mul_mem := λ a b (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ s)
(hb : ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ s) n,
by rw [mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc a, mul_assoc a, ← ha, ← hb],
inv_mem := λ a (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ s) n,
by rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)];
simp [mul_assoc] }
@[to_additive subset_add_normalizer]
lemma subset_normalizer (s : set G) [is_subgroup s] : s ⊆ normalizer s :=
λ g hg n, by rw [is_subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left _ ((is_subgroup.inv_mem_iff _).2 hg),
is_subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right _ hg]
/-- Every subgroup is a normal subgroup of its normalizer -/
@[to_additive add_normal_in_add_normalizer]
instance normal_in_normalizer (s : set G) [is_subgroup s] :
normal_subgroup (subtype.val ⁻¹' s : set (normalizer s)) :=
{ one_mem := show (1 : G) ∈ s, from is_submonoid.one_mem,
mul_mem := λ a b ha hb, show (a * b : G) ∈ s, from is_submonoid.mul_mem ha hb,
inv_mem := λ a ha, show (a⁻¹ : G) ∈ s, from is_subgroup.inv_mem ha,
normal := λ a ha ⟨m, hm⟩, (hm a).1 ha }
end is_subgroup
-- Homomorphism subgroups
namespace is_group_hom
open is_submonoid is_subgroup
open is_mul_hom (map_mul)
@[to_additive]
def ker [group H] (f : G → H) : set G := preimage f (trivial H)
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_ker [group H] (f : G → H) {x : G} : x ∈ ker f ↔ f x = 1 :=
mem_trivial
variables [group G] [group H]
@[to_additive]
lemma one_ker_inv (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] {a b : G} (h : f (a * b⁻¹) = 1) : f a = f b :=
begin
rw [map_mul f, map_inv f] at h,
rw [←inv_inv (f b), eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one h]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma one_ker_inv' (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] {a b : G} (h : f (a⁻¹ * b) = 1) : f a = f b :=
begin
rw [map_mul f, map_inv f] at h,
apply eq_of_inv_eq_inv,
rw eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one h
end
@[to_additive]
lemma inv_ker_one (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] {a b : G} (h : f a = f b) : f (a * b⁻¹) = 1 :=
have f a * (f b)⁻¹ = 1, by rw [h, mul_right_inv],
by rwa [←map_inv f, ←map_mul f] at this
@[to_additive]
lemma inv_ker_one' (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] {a b : G} (h : f a = f b) : f (a⁻¹ * b) = 1 :=
have (f a)⁻¹ * f b = 1, by rw [h, mul_left_inv],
by rwa [←map_inv f, ←map_mul f] at this
@[to_additive]
lemma one_iff_ker_inv (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (a b : G) : f a = f b ↔ f (a * b⁻¹) = 1 :=
⟨inv_ker_one f, one_ker_inv f⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma one_iff_ker_inv' (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (a b : G) : f a = f b ↔ f (a⁻¹ * b) = 1 :=
⟨inv_ker_one' f, one_ker_inv' f⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma inv_iff_ker (f : G → H) [w : is_group_hom f] (a b : G) : f a = f b ↔ a * b⁻¹ ∈ ker f :=
by rw [mem_ker]; exact one_iff_ker_inv _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma inv_iff_ker' (f : G → H) [w : is_group_hom f] (a b : G) : f a = f b ↔ a⁻¹ * b ∈ ker f :=
by rw [mem_ker]; exact one_iff_ker_inv' _ _ _
@[to_additive image_add_subgroup]
instance image_subgroup (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (s : set G) [is_subgroup s] :
is_subgroup (f '' s) :=
{ mul_mem := assume a₁ a₂ ⟨b₁, hb₁, eq₁⟩ ⟨b₂, hb₂, eq₂⟩,
⟨b₁ * b₂, mul_mem hb₁ hb₂, by simp [eq₁, eq₂, map_mul f]⟩,
one_mem := ⟨1, one_mem, map_one f⟩,
inv_mem := assume a ⟨b, hb, eq⟩, ⟨b⁻¹, inv_mem hb, by rw map_inv f; simp *⟩ }
@[to_additive range_add_subgroup]
instance range_subgroup (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] : is_subgroup (set.range f) :=
@set.image_univ _ _ f ▸ is_group_hom.image_subgroup f set.univ
local attribute [simp] one_mem inv_mem mul_mem normal_subgroup.normal
@[to_additive]
instance preimage (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (s : set H) [is_subgroup s] :
is_subgroup (f ⁻¹' s) :=
by refine {..}; simp [map_mul f, map_one f, map_inv f, @inv_mem H _ s] {contextual:=tt}
@[to_additive]
instance preimage_normal (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (s : set H) [normal_subgroup s] :
normal_subgroup (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨by simp [map_mul f, map_inv f] {contextual:=tt}⟩
@[to_additive]
instance normal_subgroup_ker (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] : normal_subgroup (ker f) :=
is_group_hom.preimage_normal f (trivial H)
@[to_additive]
lemma inj_of_trivial_ker (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (h : ker f = trivial G) :
function.injective f :=
begin
intros a₁ a₂ hfa,
simp [ext_iff, ker, is_subgroup.trivial] at h,
have ha : a₁ * a₂⁻¹ = 1, by rw ←h; exact inv_ker_one f hfa,
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one ha, inv_inv a₂]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma trivial_ker_of_inj (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (h : function.injective f) :
ker f = trivial G :=
set.ext $ assume x, iff.intro
(assume hx,
suffices f x = f 1, by simpa using h this,
by simp [map_one f]; rwa [mem_ker] at hx)
(by simp [mem_ker, is_group_hom.map_one f] {contextual := tt})
@[to_additive]
lemma inj_iff_trivial_ker (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] :
function.injective f ↔ ker f = trivial G :=
⟨trivial_ker_of_inj f, inj_of_trivial_ker f⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma trivial_ker_iff_eq_one (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] :
ker f = trivial G ↔ ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1 :=
by rw set.ext_iff; simp [ker]; exact
⟨λ h x hx, (h x).1 hx, λ h x, ⟨h x, λ hx, by rw [hx, map_one f]⟩⟩
end is_group_hom
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom]
instance subtype_val.is_group_hom [group G] {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] :
is_group_hom (subtype.val : s → G) := { ..subtype_val.is_monoid_hom }
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom]
instance coe.is_group_hom [group G] {s : set G} [is_subgroup s] :
is_group_hom (coe : s → G) := { ..subtype_val.is_monoid_hom }
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom]
instance subtype_mk.is_group_hom [group G] [group H] {s : set G}
[is_subgroup s] (f : H → G) [is_group_hom f] (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) :
is_group_hom (λ x, (⟨f x, h x⟩ : s)) := { ..subtype_mk.is_monoid_hom f h }
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom]
instance set_inclusion.is_group_hom [group G] {s t : set G}
[is_subgroup s] [is_subgroup t] (h : s ⊆ t) : is_group_hom (set.inclusion h) :=
subtype_mk.is_group_hom _ _
/-- `subtype.val : set.range f → H` as a monoid homomorphism, when `f` is a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "`subtype.val : set.range f → H` as an additive monoid homomorphism, when `f` is
an additive monoid homomorphism."]
def monoid_hom.range_subtype_val [monoid G] [monoid H] (f : G →* H) : (set.range f) →* H :=
monoid_hom.of subtype.val
/-- `set.range_factorization f : G → set.range f` as a monoid homomorphism, when `f` is a monoid
homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "`set.range_factorization f : G → set.range f` as an additive monoid homomorphism,
when `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism."]
def monoid_hom.range_factorization [monoid G] [monoid H] (f : G →* H) : G →* (set.range f) :=
{ to_fun := set.range_factorization f,
map_one' := by { dsimp [set.range_factorization], simp, refl, },
map_mul' := by { intros, dsimp [set.range_factorization], simp, refl, } }
namespace add_group
variables [add_group A]
inductive in_closure (s : set A) : A → Prop
| basic {a : A} : a ∈ s → in_closure a
| zero : in_closure 0
| neg {a : A} : in_closure a → in_closure (-a)
| add {a b : A} : in_closure a → in_closure b → in_closure (a + b)
end add_group
namespace group
open is_submonoid is_subgroup
variables [group G] {s : set G}
@[to_additive]
inductive in_closure (s : set G) : G → Prop
| basic {a : G} : a ∈ s → in_closure a
| one : in_closure 1
| inv {a : G} : in_closure a → in_closure a⁻¹
| mul {a b : G} : in_closure a → in_closure b → in_closure (a * b)
/-- `group.closure s` is the subgroup closed over `s`, i.e. the smallest subgroup containg s. -/
@[to_additive]
def closure (s : set G) : set G := {a | in_closure s a }
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_closure {a : G} : a ∈ s → a ∈ closure s := in_closure.basic
@[to_additive is_add_subgroup]
instance closure.is_subgroup (s : set G) : is_subgroup (closure s) :=
{ one_mem := in_closure.one,
mul_mem := assume a b, in_closure.mul,
inv_mem := assume a, in_closure.inv }
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_closure {s : set G} : s ⊆ closure s := λ a, mem_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_subset {s t : set G} [is_subgroup t] (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
assume a ha, by induction ha; simp [h _, *, one_mem, mul_mem, inv_mem_iff]
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_subset_iff (s t : set G) [is_subgroup t] : closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h b ha, h (mem_closure ha), assume h b ha, closure_subset h ha⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_mono {s t : set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_subset $ set.subset.trans h subset_closure
@[simp, to_additive closure_add_subgroup]
lemma closure_subgroup (s : set G) [is_subgroup s] : closure s = s :=
set.subset.antisymm (closure_subset $ set.subset.refl s) subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_list_of_mem_closure {s : set G} {a : G} (h : a ∈ closure s) :
(∃l:list G, (∀x∈l, x ∈ s ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ s) ∧ l.prod = a) :=
in_closure.rec_on h
(λ x hxs, ⟨[x], list.forall_mem_singleton.2 $ or.inl hxs, one_mul _⟩)
⟨[], list.forall_mem_nil _, rfl⟩
(λ x _ ⟨L, HL1, HL2⟩, ⟨L.reverse.map has_inv.inv,
λ x hx, let ⟨y, hy1, hy2⟩ := list.exists_of_mem_map hx in
hy2 ▸ or.imp id (by rw [inv_inv]; exact id) (HL1 _ $ list.mem_reverse.1 hy1).symm,
HL2 ▸ list.rec_on L one_inv.symm (λ hd tl ih,
by rw [list.reverse_cons, list.map_append, list.prod_append, ih, list.map_singleton,
list.prod_cons, list.prod_nil, mul_one, list.prod_cons, mul_inv_rev])⟩)
(λ x y hx hy ⟨L1, HL1, HL2⟩ ⟨L2, HL3, HL4⟩, ⟨L1 ++ L2, list.forall_mem_append.2 ⟨HL1, HL3⟩,
by rw [list.prod_append, HL2, HL4]⟩)
@[to_additive]
lemma image_closure [group H] (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] (s : set G) :
f '' closure s = closure (f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
begin
rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
apply in_closure.rec_on hx; intros,
{ solve_by_elim [subset_closure, set.mem_image_of_mem] },
{ rw [is_monoid_hom.map_one f], apply is_submonoid.one_mem },
{ rw [is_group_hom.map_inv f], apply is_subgroup.inv_mem, assumption },
{ rw [is_monoid_hom.map_mul f], solve_by_elim [is_submonoid.mul_mem] }
end
(closure_subset $ set.image_subset _ subset_closure)
@[to_additive]
theorem mclosure_subset {s : set G} : monoid.closure s ⊆ closure s :=
monoid.closure_subset $ subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem mclosure_inv_subset {s : set G} : monoid.closure (has_inv.inv ⁻¹' s) ⊆ closure s :=
monoid.closure_subset $ λ x hx, inv_inv x ▸ (is_subgroup.inv_mem $ subset_closure hx)
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_mclosure {s : set G} : closure s = monoid.closure (s ∪ has_inv.inv ⁻¹' s) :=
set.subset.antisymm
(@closure_subset _ _ _ (monoid.closure (s ∪ has_inv.inv ⁻¹' s))
{ inv_mem := λ x hx, monoid.in_closure.rec_on hx
(λ x hx, or.cases_on hx (λ hx, monoid.subset_closure $ or.inr $ show x⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ s, from (inv_inv x).symm ▸ hx)
(λ hx, monoid.subset_closure $ or.inl hx))
((@one_inv G _).symm ▸ is_submonoid.one_mem)
(λ x y hx hy ihx ihy, (mul_inv_rev x y).symm ▸ is_submonoid.mul_mem ihy ihx) }
(set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_left _ _) monoid.subset_closure))
(monoid.closure_subset $ set.union_subset subset_closure $ λ x hx, inv_inv x ▸ (is_subgroup.inv_mem $ subset_closure hx))
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_union_iff {G : Type*} [comm_group G] {s t : set G} {x : G} :
x ∈ closure (s ∪ t) ↔ ∃ y ∈ closure s, ∃ z ∈ closure t, y * z = x :=
begin
simp only [closure_eq_mclosure, monoid.mem_closure_union_iff, exists_prop, preimage_union], split,
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨ys, hys, yt, hyt, rfl⟩, _, ⟨zs, hzs, zt, hzt, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨_, hys, _, hzs, rfl⟩, _, ⟨_, hyt, _, hzt, rfl⟩, _⟩,
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm zs] },
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨ys, hys, zs, hzs, rfl⟩, _, ⟨yt, hyt, zt, hzt, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨ys, hys, yt, hyt, rfl⟩, _, ⟨zs, hzs, zt, hzt, rfl⟩, _⟩,
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm yt] }
end
@[to_additive gmultiples_eq_closure]
theorem gpowers_eq_closure {a : G} : gpowers a = closure {a} :=
subset.antisymm
(gpowers_subset $ mem_closure $ by simp)
(closure_subset $ by simp [mem_gpowers])
end group
namespace is_subgroup
variable [group G]
@[to_additive]
lemma trivial_eq_closure : trivial G = group.closure ∅ :=
subset.antisymm
(by simp [set.subset_def, is_submonoid.one_mem])
(group.closure_subset $ by simp)
end is_subgroup
/-The normal closure of a set s is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of s. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing s. -/
namespace group
variables {s : set G} [group G]
/-- Given an element a, conjugates a is the set of conjugates. -/
def conjugates (a : G) : set G := {b | is_conj a b}
lemma mem_conjugates_self {a : G} : a ∈ conjugates a := is_conj_refl _
/-- Given a set s, conjugates_of_set s is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of s. -/
def conjugates_of_set (s : set G) : set G := ⋃ a ∈ s, conjugates a
lemma mem_conjugates_of_set_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugates_of_set s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, is_conj a x :=
set.mem_bUnion_iff
theorem subset_conjugates_of_set : s ⊆ conjugates_of_set s :=
λ (x : G) (h : x ∈ s), mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.2 ⟨x, h, is_conj_refl _⟩
theorem conjugates_of_set_mono {s t : set G} (h : s ⊆ t) :
conjugates_of_set s ⊆ conjugates_of_set t :=
set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left h
lemma conjugates_subset {t : set G} [normal_subgroup t] {a : G} (h : a ∈ t) : conjugates a ⊆ t :=
λ x ⟨c,w⟩,
begin
have H := normal_subgroup.normal a h c,
rwa ←w,
end
theorem conjugates_of_set_subset {s t : set G} [normal_subgroup t] (h : s ⊆ t) :
conjugates_of_set s ⊆ t :=
set.bUnion_subset (λ x H, conjugates_subset (h H))
/-- The set of conjugates of s is closed under conjugation. -/
lemma conj_mem_conjugates_of_set {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugates_of_set s → (c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugates_of_set s) :=
λ H,
begin
rcases (mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.1 H) with ⟨a,h₁,h₂⟩,
exact mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, is_conj_trans h₂ ⟨c,rfl⟩⟩,
end
/-- The normal closure of a set s is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of s. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing s. -/
def normal_closure (s : set G) : set G := closure (conjugates_of_set s)
theorem conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure : conjugates_of_set s ⊆ normal_closure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normal_closure : s ⊆ normal_closure s :=
set.subset.trans subset_conjugates_of_set conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure
/-- The normal closure of a set is a subgroup. -/
instance normal_closure.is_subgroup (s : set G) : is_subgroup (normal_closure s) :=
closure.is_subgroup (conjugates_of_set s)
/-- The normal closure of s is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normal_closure.is_normal : normal_subgroup (normal_closure s) :=
⟨ λ n h g,
begin
induction h with x hx x hx ihx x y hx hy ihx ihy,
{exact (conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure (conj_mem_conjugates_of_set hx))},
{simpa using (normal_closure.is_subgroup s).one_mem},
{rw ←conj_inv,
exact (is_subgroup.inv_mem ihx)},
{rw ←conj_mul,
exact (is_submonoid.mul_mem ihx ihy)},
end ⟩
/-- The normal closure of s is the smallest normal subgroup containing s. -/
theorem normal_closure_subset {s t : set G} [normal_subgroup t] (h : s ⊆ t) :
normal_closure s ⊆ t :=
λ a w,
begin
induction w with x hx x hx ihx x y hx hy ihx ihy,
{exact (conjugates_of_set_subset h $ hx)},
{exact is_submonoid.one_mem},
{exact is_subgroup.inv_mem ihx},
{exact is_submonoid.mul_mem ihx ihy}
end
lemma normal_closure_subset_iff {s t : set G} [normal_subgroup t] : s ⊆ t ↔ normal_closure s ⊆ t :=
⟨normal_closure_subset, set.subset.trans (subset_normal_closure)⟩
theorem normal_closure_mono {s t : set G} : s ⊆ t → normal_closure s ⊆ normal_closure t :=
λ h, normal_closure_subset (set.subset.trans h (subset_normal_closure))
end group
section simple_group
class simple_group (G : Type*) [group G] : Prop :=
(simple : ∀ (N : set G) [normal_subgroup N], N = is_subgroup.trivial G ∨ N = set.univ)
class simple_add_group (A : Type*) [add_group A] : Prop :=
(simple : ∀ (N : set A) [normal_add_subgroup N], N = is_add_subgroup.trivial A ∨ N = set.univ)
attribute [to_additive simple_add_group] simple_group
theorem additive.simple_add_group_iff [group G] :
simple_add_group (additive G) ↔ simple_group G :=
⟨λ hs, ⟨λ N h, @simple_add_group.simple _ _ hs _ (by exactI additive.normal_add_subgroup_iff.2 h)⟩,
λ hs, ⟨λ N h, @simple_group.simple _ _ hs _ (by exactI additive.normal_add_subgroup_iff.1 h)⟩⟩
instance additive.simple_add_group [group G] [simple_group G] :
simple_add_group (additive G) := additive.simple_add_group_iff.2 (by apply_instance)
theorem multiplicative.simple_group_iff [add_group A] :
simple_group (multiplicative A) ↔ simple_add_group A :=
⟨λ hs, ⟨λ N h, @simple_group.simple _ _ hs _ (by exactI multiplicative.normal_subgroup_iff.2 h)⟩,
λ hs, ⟨λ N h, @simple_add_group.simple _ _ hs _ (by exactI multiplicative.normal_subgroup_iff.1 h)⟩⟩
instance multiplicative.simple_group [add_group A] [simple_add_group A] :
simple_group (multiplicative A) := multiplicative.simple_group_iff.2 (by apply_instance)
@[to_additive simple_add_group_of_surjective]
lemma simple_group_of_surjective [group G] [group H] [simple_group G] (f : G → H)
[is_group_hom f] (hf : function.surjective f) : simple_group H :=
⟨λ H iH, have normal_subgroup (f ⁻¹' H), by resetI; apply_instance,
begin
resetI,
cases simple_group.simple (f ⁻¹' H) with h h,
{ refine or.inl (is_subgroup.eq_trivial_iff.2 (λ x hx, _)),
cases hf x with y hy,
rw ← hy at hx,
rw [← hy, is_subgroup.eq_trivial_iff.1 h y hx, is_group_hom.map_one f] },
{ refine or.inr (set.eq_univ_of_forall (λ x, _)),
cases hf x with y hy,
rw set.eq_univ_iff_forall at h,
rw ← hy,
exact h y }
end⟩
end simple_group
|
337097de44a0ee5d03aba2c35374370854c73619 | 8eeb99d0fdf8125f5d39a0ce8631653f588ee817 | /src/measure_theory/measure_space.lean | 2e77d56cac02e890da1f3fbeafd8d873c8e19573 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jesse-michael-han/mathlib | a15c58378846011b003669354cbab7062b893cfe | fa6312e4dc971985e6b7708d99a5bc3062485c89 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,200,760,912 | 1,602,081,753,000 | 1,602,081,753,000 | 181,787,230 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,460,682,000 | 1,555,460,682,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 77,198 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import measure_theory.outer_measure
import order.filter.countable_Inter
import data.set.accumulate
/-!
# Measure spaces
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ennreal`.
We introduce the following typeclasses for measures:
* `probability_measure μ`: `μ univ = 1`;
* `finite_measure μ`: `μ univ < ⊤`;
* `sigma_finite μ`: there exists a countable collection of measurable sets that cover `univ`
where `μ` is finite;
* `locally_finite_measure μ` : `∀ x, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, μ s < ⊤`;
* `has_no_atoms μ` : `∀ x, μ {x} = 0`; possibly should be redefined as
`∀ s, 0 < μ s → ∃ t ⊆ s, 0 < μ t ∧ μ t < μ s`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `measure.of_measurable` and `outer_measure.to_measure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `measure.of_measurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `outer_measure.to_measure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generate_from_of_Union`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of the
more general `ext_of_generate_from_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generate_from_of_Union` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `measure_space` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set filter function
open_locale classical topological_space big_operators filter
universes u v w x
namespace measure_theory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure. -/
structure measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] extends outer_measure α :=
(m_Union ⦃f : ℕ → set α⦄ :
(∀i, is_measurable (f i)) → pairwise (disjoint on f) →
measure_of (⋃i, f i) = (∑'i, measure_of (f i)))
(trimmed : to_outer_measure.trim = to_outer_measure)
/-- Measure projections for a measure space.
For measurable sets this returns the measure assigned by the `measure_of` field in `measure`.
But we can extend this to _all_ sets, but using the outer measure. This gives us monotonicity and
subadditivity for all sets.
-/
instance measure.has_coe_to_fun {α} [measurable_space α] : has_coe_to_fun (measure α) :=
⟨λ _, set α → ennreal, λ m, m.to_outer_measure⟩
namespace measure
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def of_measurable {α} [measurable_space α]
(m : Π (s : set α), is_measurable s → ennreal)
(m0 : m ∅ is_measurable.empty = 0)
(mU : ∀ {{f : ℕ → set α}} (h : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)),
pairwise (disjoint on f) →
m (⋃i, f i) (is_measurable.Union h) = (∑'i, m (f i) (h i))) :
measure α :=
{ m_Union := λ f hf hd,
show induced_outer_measure m _ m0 (Union f) =
∑' i, induced_outer_measure m _ m0 (f i), begin
rw [induced_outer_measure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd],
congr, funext n, rw induced_outer_measure_eq m0 mU
end,
trimmed :=
show (induced_outer_measure m _ m0).trim = induced_outer_measure m _ m0, begin
unfold outer_measure.trim,
congr, funext s hs,
exact induced_outer_measure_eq m0 mU hs
end,
..induced_outer_measure m _ m0 }
lemma of_measurable_apply {α} [measurable_space α]
{m : Π (s : set α), is_measurable s → ennreal}
{m0 : m ∅ is_measurable.empty = 0}
{mU : ∀ {{f : ℕ → set α}} (h : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)),
pairwise (disjoint on f) →
m (⋃i, f i) (is_measurable.Union h) = (∑'i, m (f i) (h i))}
(s : set α) (hs : is_measurable s) :
of_measurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
induced_outer_measure_eq m0 mU hs
lemma to_outer_measure_injective {α} [measurable_space α] :
injective (to_outer_measure : measure α → outer_measure α) :=
λ ⟨m₁, u₁, h₁⟩ ⟨m₂, u₂, h₂⟩ h, by { congr, exact h }
@[ext] lemma ext {α} [measurable_space α] {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α}
(h : ∀s, is_measurable s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) :
μ₁ = μ₂ :=
to_outer_measure_injective $ by rw [← trimmed, outer_measure.trim_congr h, trimmed]
lemma ext_iff {α} [measurable_space α] {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} :
μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀s, is_measurable s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by { rintro rfl s hs, refl }, measure.ext⟩
end measure
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : measure α}
{s s₁ s₂ : set α}
@[simp] lemma coe_to_outer_measure : ⇑μ.to_outer_measure = μ := rfl
lemma to_outer_measure_apply (s) : μ.to_outer_measure s = μ s := rfl
lemma measure_eq_trim (s) : μ s = μ.to_outer_measure.trim s :=
by rw μ.trimmed; refl
lemma measure_eq_infi (s) : μ s = ⨅ t (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : is_measurable t), μ t :=
by rw [measure_eq_trim, outer_measure.trim_eq_infi]; refl
lemma measure_eq_induced_outer_measure :
μ s = induced_outer_measure (λ s _, μ s) is_measurable.empty μ.empty s :=
measure_eq_trim _
lemma to_outer_measure_eq_induced_outer_measure :
μ.to_outer_measure = induced_outer_measure (λ s _, μ s) is_measurable.empty μ.empty :=
μ.trimmed.symm
lemma measure_eq_extend (hs : is_measurable s) :
μ s = extend (λ t (ht : is_measurable t), μ t) s :=
by { rw [measure_eq_induced_outer_measure, induced_outer_measure_eq_extend _ _ hs], exact μ.m_Union }
@[simp] lemma measure_empty : μ ∅ = 0 := μ.empty
lemma nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (h : μ s ≠ 0) : s.nonempty :=
ne_empty_iff_nonempty.1 $ λ h', h $ h'.symm ▸ measure_empty
lemma measure_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := μ.mono h
lemma measure_mono_null (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : μ s₂ = 0) : μ s₁ = 0 :=
le_zero_iff_eq.1 $ h₂ ▸ measure_mono h
lemma measure_mono_top (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : μ s₁ = ⊤) : μ s₂ = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ h₁ ▸ measure_mono h
lemma exists_is_measurable_superset_of_measure_eq_zero {s : set α} (h : μ s = 0) :
∃t, s ⊆ t ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ t = 0 :=
outer_measure.exists_is_measurable_superset_of_trim_eq_zero (by rw [← measure_eq_trim, h])
lemma exists_is_measurable_superset_iff_measure_eq_zero {s : set α} :
(∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ t = 0) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
⟨λ ⟨t, hst, _, ht⟩, measure_mono_null hst ht, exists_is_measurable_superset_of_measure_eq_zero⟩
theorem measure_Union_le {β} [encodable β] (s : β → set α) : μ (⋃i, s i) ≤ (∑'i, μ (s i)) :=
μ.to_outer_measure.Union _
lemma measure_bUnion_le {s : set β} (hs : countable s) (f : β → set α) :
μ (⋃b∈s, f b) ≤ ∑'p:s, μ (f p) :=
begin
haveI := hs.to_encodable,
rw [bUnion_eq_Union],
apply measure_Union_le
end
lemma measure_bUnion_finset_le (s : finset β) (f : β → set α) :
μ (⋃b∈s, f b) ≤ ∑ p in s, μ (f p) :=
begin
rw [← finset.sum_attach, finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype],
exact measure_bUnion_le s.countable_to_set f
end
lemma measure_bUnion_lt_top {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s)
(hfin : ∀ i ∈ s, μ (f i) < ⊤) : μ (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) < ⊤ :=
begin
convert (measure_bUnion_finset_le hs.to_finset f).trans_lt _,
{ ext, rw [finite.mem_to_finset] },
apply ennreal.sum_lt_top, simpa only [finite.mem_to_finset]
end
lemma measure_Union_null {β} [encodable β] {s : β → set α} :
(∀ i, μ (s i) = 0) → μ (⋃i, s i) = 0 :=
μ.to_outer_measure.Union_null
theorem measure_union_le (s₁ s₂ : set α) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ≤ μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
μ.to_outer_measure.union _ _
lemma measure_union_null {s₁ s₂ : set α} : μ s₁ = 0 → μ s₂ = 0 → μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = 0 :=
μ.to_outer_measure.union_null
lemma measure_Union {β} [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hn : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (h : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)) :
μ (⋃i, f i) = (∑'i, μ (f i)) :=
begin
rw [measure_eq_extend (is_measurable.Union h),
extend_Union is_measurable.empty _ is_measurable.Union _ hn h],
{ simp [measure_eq_extend, h] },
{ exact μ.empty },
{ exact μ.m_Union }
end
lemma measure_union (hd : disjoint s₁ s₂) (h₁ : is_measurable s₁) (h₂ : is_measurable s₂) :
μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
begin
rw [union_eq_Union, measure_Union, tsum_fintype, fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond],
exacts [pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 hd, λ b, bool.cases_on b h₂ h₁]
end
lemma measure_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : countable s)
(hd : pairwise_on s (disjoint on f)) (h : ∀b∈s, is_measurable (f b)) :
μ (⋃b∈s, f b) = ∑'p:s, μ (f p) :=
begin
haveI := hs.to_encodable,
rw [← measure_Union, bUnion_eq_Union],
{ rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ ij x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
exact hd i hi j hj (mt subtype.ext_val ij:_) ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ simpa }
end
lemma measure_sUnion {S : set (set α)} (hs : countable S)
(hd : pairwise_on S disjoint) (h : ∀s∈S, is_measurable s) :
μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s:S, μ s :=
by rw [sUnion_eq_bUnion, measure_bUnion hs hd h]
lemma measure_bUnion_finset {s : finset ι} {f : ι → set α} (hd : pairwise_on ↑s (disjoint on f))
(hm : ∀b∈s, is_measurable (f b)) :
μ (⋃b∈s, f b) = ∑ p in s, μ (f p) :=
begin
rw [← finset.sum_attach, finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype],
exact measure_bUnion s.countable_to_set hd hm
end
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
lemma tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : set β} (hs : countable s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, is_measurable (f ⁻¹' {y})) :
(∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) :=
by rw [← set.bUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_bUnion hs (pairwise_on_disjoint_fiber _ _) hf]
/-- If `s` is a `finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
lemma sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, is_measurable (f ⁻¹' {y})) :
∑ b in s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b}) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) :=
by simp only [← measure_bUnion_finset (pairwise_on_disjoint_fiber _ _) hf,
finset.bUnion_preimage_singleton]
lemma measure_diff {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₁ : is_measurable s₁) (h₂ : is_measurable s₂)
(h_fin : μ s₂ < ⊤) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ :=
begin
refine (ennreal.add_sub_self' h_fin).symm.trans _,
rw [← measure_union disjoint_diff h₂ (h₁.diff h₂), union_diff_cancel h]
end
lemma measure_compl {μ : measure α} {s : set α} (h₁ : is_measurable s) (h_fin : μ s < ⊤) :
μ (sᶜ) = μ univ - μ s :=
by { rw compl_eq_univ_diff, exact measure_diff (subset_univ s) is_measurable.univ h₁ h_fin }
lemma sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : finset ι} {t : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, is_measurable (t i))
(H : pairwise_on ↑s (disjoint on t)) :
∑ i in s, μ (t i) ≤ μ (univ : set α) :=
by { rw ← measure_bUnion_finset H h, exact measure_mono (subset_univ _) }
lemma tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → set α} (hs : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i))
(H : pairwise (disjoint on s)) :
(∑' i, μ (s i)) ≤ μ (univ : set α) :=
begin
rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum],
exact supr_le (λ s, sum_measure_le_measure_univ (λ i hi, hs i) (λ i hi j hj hij, H i j hij))
end
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
lemma exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure (μ : measure α) {s : ι → set α}
(hs : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) (H : μ (univ : set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) :
∃ i j (h : i ≠ j), (s i ∩ s j).nonempty :=
begin
contrapose! H,
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs,
exact λ i j hij x hx, H i j hij ⟨x, hx⟩
end
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `finset` and
`∑ i in s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
lemma exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure (μ : measure α) {s : finset ι}
{t : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, is_measurable (t i)) (H : μ (univ : set α) < ∑ i in s, μ (t i)) :
∃ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s) (h : i ≠ j), (t i ∩ t j).nonempty :=
begin
contrapose! H,
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h,
exact λ i hi j hj hij x hx, H i hi j hj hij ⟨x, hx⟩
end
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a directed sequence of measurable sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
lemma measure_Union_eq_supr [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i))
(hd : directed (⊆) s) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
begin
by_cases hι : nonempty ι, swap,
{ simp only [supr_of_empty hι, Union], exact measure_empty },
resetI,
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ i, measure_mono $ subset_Union _ _),
have : ∀ n, is_measurable (disjointed (λ n, ⋃ b ∈ encodable.decode2 ι n, s b) n) :=
is_measurable.disjointed (is_measurable.bUnion_decode2 h),
rw [← encodable.Union_decode2, ← Union_disjointed, measure_Union disjoint_disjointed this,
ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat],
simp only [← measure_bUnion_finset (disjoint_disjointed.pairwise_on _) (λ n _, this n)],
refine supr_le (λ n, _),
refine le_trans (_ : _ ≤ μ (⋃ (k ∈ finset.range n) (i ∈ encodable.decode2 ι k), s i)) _,
exact measure_mono (bUnion_subset_bUnion_right (λ k hk, disjointed_subset)),
simp only [← finset.bUnion_option_to_finset, ← finset.bUnion_bind],
generalize : (finset.range n).bind (λ k, (encodable.decode2 ι k).to_finset) = t,
rcases hd.finset_le t with ⟨i, hi⟩,
exact le_supr_of_le i (measure_mono $ bUnion_subset hi)
end
lemma measure_bUnion_eq_supr {s : ι → set α} {t : set ι} (ht : countable t)
(h : ∀ i ∈ t, is_measurable (s i)) (hd : directed_on ((⊆) on s) t) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) :=
begin
haveI := ht.to_encodable,
rw [bUnion_eq_Union, measure_Union_eq_supr (set_coe.forall'.1 h) hd.directed_coe,
supr_subtype'],
refl
end
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the infimum of the measures. -/
lemma measure_Inter_eq_infi [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α}
(h : ∀i, is_measurable (s i)) (hd : directed (⊇) s)
(hfin : ∃i, μ (s i) < ⊤) :
μ (⋂i, s i) = (⨅i, μ (s i)) :=
begin
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩,
rw [← ennreal.sub_sub_cancel (by exact hk) (infi_le _ k), ennreal.sub_infi,
← ennreal.sub_sub_cancel (by exact hk) (measure_mono (Inter_subset _ k)),
← measure_diff (Inter_subset _ k) (h k) (is_measurable.Inter h)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (Inter_subset _ k)) hk),
diff_Inter, measure_Union_eq_supr],
{ congr' 1,
refine le_antisymm (supr_le_supr2 $ λ i, _) (supr_le_supr $ λ i, _),
{ rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩,
use j,
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (h _) ((measure_mono hjk).trans_lt hk)],
exact measure_mono (diff_subset_diff_right hji) },
{ rw [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, ← measure_union disjoint_diff.symm ((h k).diff (h i)) (h i),
set.union_comm],
exact measure_mono (diff_subset_iff.1 $ subset.refl _) } },
{ exact λ i, (h k).diff (h i) },
{ exact hd.mono_comp _ (λ _ _, diff_subset_diff_right) }
end
lemma measure_eq_inter_diff {s t : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ s = μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) :=
have hd : disjoint (s ∩ t) (s \ t) := assume a ⟨⟨_, hs⟩, _, hns⟩, hns hs ,
by rw [← measure_union hd (hs.inter ht) (hs.diff ht), inter_union_diff s t]
lemma measure_union_add_inter {s t : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t :=
by { rw [measure_eq_inter_diff (hs.union ht) ht, set.union_inter_cancel_right,
union_diff_right, measure_eq_inter_diff hs ht], ac_refl }
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of measurable sets
is the limit of the measures. -/
lemma tendsto_measure_Union {μ : measure α} {s : ℕ → set α}
(hs : ∀n, is_measurable (s n)) (hm : monotone s) :
tendsto (μ ∘ s) at_top (𝓝 (μ (⋃n, s n))) :=
begin
rw measure_Union_eq_supr hs (directed_of_sup hm),
exact tendsto_at_top_supr_nat (μ ∘ s) (assume n m hnm, measure_mono $ hm hnm)
end
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
lemma tendsto_measure_Inter {μ : measure α} {s : ℕ → set α}
(hs : ∀n, is_measurable (s n)) (hm : ∀ ⦃n m⦄, n ≤ m → s m ⊆ s n) (hf : ∃i, μ (s i) < ⊤) :
tendsto (μ ∘ s) at_top (𝓝 (μ (⋂n, s n))) :=
begin
rw measure_Inter_eq_infi hs (directed_of_sup hm) hf,
exact tendsto_at_top_infi_nat (μ ∘ s) (assume n m hnm, measure_mono $ hm hnm),
end
/-- One direction of the Borel-Cantelli lemma: if (sᵢ) is a sequence of measurable sets such that
∑ μ sᵢ exists, then the limit superior of the sᵢ is a null set. -/
lemma measure_limsup_eq_zero {s : ℕ → set α} (hs : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i))
(hs' : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ⊤) : μ (limsup at_top s) = 0 :=
begin
rw limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat',
-- We will show that both `μ (⨅ n, ⨆ i, s (i + n))` and `0` are the limit of `μ (⊔ i, s (i + n))`
-- as `n` tends to infinity. For the former, we use continuity from above.
refine tendsto_nhds_unique
(tendsto_measure_Inter (λ i, is_measurable.Union (λ b, hs (b + i))) _
⟨0, lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_Union_le s) (ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hs')⟩) _,
{ intros n m hnm x,
simp only [set.mem_Union],
exact λ ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨i + (m - n), by simpa only [add_assoc, nat.sub_add_cancel hnm] using hi⟩ },
{ -- For the latter, notice that, `μ (⨆ i, s (i + n)) ≤ ∑' s (i + n)`. Since the right hand side
-- converges to `0` by hypothesis, so does the former and the proof is complete.
exact (tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds
(ennreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add (μ ∘ s) hs')
(eventually_of_forall (by simp only [forall_const, zero_le]))
(eventually_of_forall (λ i, measure_Union_le _))) }
end
end
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def outer_measure.to_measure {α} (m : outer_measure α)
[ms : measurable_space α] (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
measure α :=
measure.of_measurable (λ s _, m s) m.empty
(λ f hf hd, m.Union_eq_of_caratheodory (λ i, h _ (hf i)) hd)
lemma le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory {α} [ms : measurable_space α]
(μ : measure α) : ms ≤ μ.to_outer_measure.caratheodory :=
begin
assume s hs,
rw to_outer_measure_eq_induced_outer_measure,
refine outer_measure.of_function_caratheodory (λ t, le_infi $ λ ht, _),
rw [← measure_eq_extend (ht.inter hs),
← measure_eq_extend (ht.diff hs),
← measure_union _ (ht.inter hs) (ht.diff hs),
inter_union_diff],
exact le_refl _,
exact λ x ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, _, h₂⟩, h₂ h₁
end
@[simp] lemma to_measure_to_outer_measure {α} (m : outer_measure α)
[ms : measurable_space α] (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.to_measure h).to_outer_measure = m.trim := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_measure_apply {α} (m : outer_measure α)
[ms : measurable_space α] (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory)
{s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
m.to_measure h s = m s := m.trim_eq hs
lemma le_to_measure_apply {α} (m : outer_measure α) [ms : measurable_space α]
(h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : set α) :
m s ≤ m.to_measure h s :=
m.le_trim s
@[simp] lemma to_outer_measure_to_measure {α : Type*} [ms : measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} :
μ.to_outer_measure.to_measure (le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
measure.ext $ λ s, μ.to_outer_measure.trim_eq
namespace measure
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
[measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
/-! ### The `ennreal`-module of measures -/
instance : has_zero (measure α) :=
⟨{ to_outer_measure := 0,
m_Union := λ f hf hd, tsum_zero.symm,
trimmed := outer_measure.trim_zero }⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_to_outer_measure : (0 : measure α).to_outer_measure = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : measure α) = 0 := rfl
lemma eq_zero_of_not_nonempty (h : ¬nonempty α) (μ : measure α) : μ = 0 :=
ext $ λ s hs, by simp only [eq_empty_of_not_nonempty h s, measure_empty]
instance : inhabited (measure α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_add (measure α) :=
⟨λμ₁ μ₂, {
to_outer_measure := μ₁.to_outer_measure + μ₂.to_outer_measure,
m_Union := λs hs hd,
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i),
by rw [ennreal.tsum_add, measure_Union hd hs, measure_Union hd hs],
trimmed := by rw [outer_measure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp] theorem add_to_outer_measure (μ₁ μ₂ : measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).to_outer_measure = μ₁.to_outer_measure + μ₂.to_outer_measure := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_add (μ₁ μ₂ : measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ := rfl
theorem add_apply (μ₁ μ₂ : measure α) (s) : (μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s := rfl
instance add_comm_monoid : add_comm_monoid (measure α) :=
to_outer_measure_injective.add_comm_monoid to_outer_measure zero_to_outer_measure
add_to_outer_measure
instance : has_scalar ennreal (measure α) :=
⟨λ c μ,
{ to_outer_measure := c • μ.to_outer_measure,
m_Union := λ s hs hd, by simp [measure_Union, *, ennreal.tsum_mul_left],
trimmed := by rw [outer_measure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp] theorem smul_to_outer_measure (c : ennreal) (μ : measure α) :
(c • μ).to_outer_measure = c • μ.to_outer_measure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_smul (c : ennreal) (μ : measure α) :
⇑(c • μ) = c • μ :=
rfl
theorem smul_apply (c : ennreal) (μ : measure α) (s : set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
instance : semimodule ennreal (measure α) :=
injective.semimodule ennreal ⟨to_outer_measure, zero_to_outer_measure, add_to_outer_measure⟩
to_outer_measure_injective smul_to_outer_measure
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
instance : partial_order (measure α) :=
{ le := λm₁ m₂, ∀ s, is_measurable s → m₁ s ≤ m₂ s,
le_refl := assume m s hs, le_refl _,
le_trans := assume m₁ m₂ m₃ h₁ h₂ s hs, le_trans (h₁ s hs) (h₂ s hs),
le_antisymm := assume m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂, ext $
assume s hs, le_antisymm (h₁ s hs) (h₂ s hs) }
theorem le_iff {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} :
μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, is_measurable s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := iff.rfl
theorem to_outer_measure_le {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} :
μ₁.to_outer_measure ≤ μ₂.to_outer_measure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
by rw [← μ₂.trimmed, outer_measure.le_trim_iff]; refl
theorem le_iff' {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} :
μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s :=
to_outer_measure_le.symm
theorem lt_iff {μ ν : measure α} : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, is_measurable s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl $ by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' {μ ν : measure α} : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl $ by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
section
variables {m : set (measure α)} {μ : measure α}
lemma Inf_caratheodory (s : set α) (hs : is_measurable s) :
(Inf (measure.to_outer_measure '' m)).caratheodory.is_measurable' s :=
begin
rw [outer_measure.Inf_eq_of_function_Inf_gen],
refine outer_measure.of_function_caratheodory (assume t, _),
cases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht ht, by simp [ht],
simp only [outer_measure.Inf_gen_nonempty1 _ _ ht, le_infi_iff, ball_image_iff,
coe_to_outer_measure, measure_eq_infi t],
assume μ hμ u htu hu,
have hm : ∀{s t}, s ⊆ t → outer_measure.Inf_gen (to_outer_measure '' m) s ≤ μ t,
{ assume s t hst,
rw [outer_measure.Inf_gen_nonempty2 _ _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hμ)],
refine infi_le_of_le (μ.to_outer_measure) (infi_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hμ) _),
rw [to_outer_measure_apply],
refine measure_mono hst },
rw [measure_eq_inter_diff hu hs],
refine add_le_add (hm $ inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm $ diff_subset_diff_left htu)
end
instance : has_Inf (measure α) :=
⟨λm, (Inf (to_outer_measure '' m)).to_measure $ Inf_caratheodory⟩
lemma Inf_apply {m : set (measure α)} {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
Inf m s = Inf (to_outer_measure '' m) s :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
private lemma Inf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : Inf m ≤ μ :=
have Inf (to_outer_measure '' m) ≤ μ.to_outer_measure := Inf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h),
assume s hs, by rw [Inf_apply hs, ← to_outer_measure_apply]; exact this s
private lemma le_Inf (h : ∀μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ Inf m :=
have μ.to_outer_measure ≤ Inf (to_outer_measure '' m) :=
le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume μ hμ, to_outer_measure_le.2 $ h _ hμ,
assume s hs, by rw [Inf_apply hs, ← to_outer_measure_apply]; exact this s
instance : complete_lattice (measure α) :=
{ bot := 0,
bot_le := assume a s hs, by exact bot_le,
/- Adding an explicit `top` makes `leanchecker` fail, see lean#364, disable for now
top := (⊤ : outer_measure α).to_measure (by rw [outer_measure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top),
le_top := assume a s hs,
by cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h;
simp [h, to_measure_apply ⊤ _ hs, outer_measure.top_apply],
-/
.. complete_lattice_of_Inf (measure α) (λ ms, ⟨λ _, Inf_le, λ _, le_Inf⟩) }
@[simp] lemma measure_univ_eq_zero {μ : measure α} : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨λ h, bot_unique $ λ s hs, trans_rel_left (≤) (measure_mono (subset_univ s)) h, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
-- TODO: add typeclasses for `∀ c, monotone ((*) c)` and `∀ c, monotone ((+) c)`
protected lemma add_le_add_left {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} (ν : measure α) (hμ : μ₁ ≤ μ₂) :
ν + μ₁ ≤ ν + μ₂ :=
λ s hs, add_le_add_left (hμ s hs) _
protected lemma add_le_add_right {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} (hμ : μ₁ ≤ μ₂) (ν : measure α) :
μ₁ + ν ≤ μ₂ + ν :=
λ s hs, add_le_add_right (hμ s hs) _
protected lemma add_le_add {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} (hμ : μ₁ ≤ μ₂) {ν₁ ν₂ : measure α} (hν : ν₁ ≤ ν₂) :
μ₁ + ν₁ ≤ μ₂ + ν₂ :=
λ s hs, add_le_add (hμ s hs) (hν s hs)
protected lemma zero_le (μ : measure α) : 0 ≤ μ := bot_le
protected lemma le_add_left {ν ν' : measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν :=
λ s hs, le_add_left (h s hs)
protected lemma le_add_right {ν ν' : measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' :=
λ s hs, le_add_right (h s hs)
end
/-! ### Pushforward and pullback -/
/-- Lift a linear map between `outer_measure` spaces such that for each measure `μ` every measurable
set is caratheodory-measurable w.r.t. `f μ` to a linear map between `measure` spaces. -/
def lift_linear (f : outer_measure α →ₗ[ennreal] outer_measure β)
(hf : ∀ μ : measure α, ‹_› ≤ (f μ.to_outer_measure).caratheodory) :
measure α →ₗ[ennreal] measure β :=
{ to_fun := λ μ, (f μ.to_outer_measure).to_measure (hf μ),
map_add' := λ μ₁ μ₂, ext $ λ s hs, by simp [hs],
map_smul' := λ c μ, ext $ λ s hs, by simp [hs] }
@[simp] lemma lift_linear_apply {f : outer_measure α →ₗ[ennreal] outer_measure β} (hf)
{μ : measure α} {s : set β} (hs : is_measurable s) :
lift_linear f hf μ s = f μ.to_outer_measure s :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
lemma le_lift_linear_apply {f : outer_measure α →ₗ[ennreal] outer_measure β} (hf)
{μ : measure α} (s : set β) :
f μ.to_outer_measure s ≤ lift_linear f hf μ s :=
le_to_measure_apply _ _ s
/-- The pushforward of a measure. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not a measurable function. -/
def map (f : α → β) : measure α →ₗ[ennreal] measure β :=
if hf : measurable f then
lift_linear (outer_measure.map f) $ λ μ s hs t,
le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory μ _ (hf hs) (f ⁻¹' t)
else 0
variables {μ ν : measure α}
@[simp] theorem map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) {s : set β} (hs : is_measurable s) :
map f μ s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) :=
by simp [map, dif_pos hf, hs]
@[simp] lemma map_id : map id μ = μ :=
ext $ λ s, map_apply measurable_id
lemma map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : measurable g) (hf : measurable f) :
map g (map f μ) = map (g ∘ f) μ :=
ext $ λ s hs,
by simp [hf, hg, hs, hg hs, hg.comp hf, ← preimage_comp]
/-- Pullback of a `measure`. If `f` sends each `measurable` set to a `measurable` set, then for each
measurable set `s` we have `comap f μ s = μ (f '' s)`. -/
def comap (f : α → β) : measure β →ₗ[ennreal] measure α :=
if hf : injective f ∧ ∀ s, is_measurable s → is_measurable (f '' s) then
lift_linear (outer_measure.comap f) $ λ μ s hs t,
begin
simp only [coe_to_outer_measure, outer_measure.comap_apply, ← image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1],
apply le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory,
exact hf.2 s hs
end
else 0
lemma comap_apply (f : α → β) (hfi : injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, is_measurable s → is_measurable (f '' s)) (μ : measure β)
{s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
begin
rw [comap, dif_pos, lift_linear_apply _ hs, outer_measure.comap_apply, coe_to_outer_measure],
exact ⟨hfi, hf⟩
end
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ennreal`-linear map. -/
def restrictₗ (s : set α) : measure α →ₗ[ennreal] measure α :=
lift_linear (outer_measure.restrict s) $ λ μ s' hs' t,
begin
suffices : μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ (s ∩ t \ s'),
{ simpa [← set.inter_assoc, set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc] },
exact le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _,
end
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
def restrict (μ : measure α) (s : set α) : measure α := restrictₗ s μ
@[simp] lemma restrictₗ_apply (s : set α) (μ : measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma restrict_apply {s t : set α} (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
by simp [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, ht]
lemma restrict_apply_univ (s : set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s :=
by rw [restrict_apply is_measurable.univ, set.univ_inter]
lemma le_restrict_apply (s t : set α) :
μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
by { rw [restrict, restrictₗ], convert le_lift_linear_apply _ t, simp }
@[simp] lemma restrict_add (μ ν : measure α) (s : set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
@[simp] lemma restrict_zero (s : set α) : (0 : measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
@[simp] lemma restrict_smul (c : ennreal) (μ : measure α) (s : set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_smul c μ
@[simp] lemma restrict_restrict {s t : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext $ λ u hu, by simp [*, set.inter_assoc]
lemma restrict_apply_eq_zero {s t : set α} (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
by rw [restrict_apply ht]
lemma restrict_apply_eq_zero' {s t : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, le_zero_iff_eq.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _), λ h, _⟩,
rcases exists_is_measurable_superset_of_measure_eq_zero h with ⟨t', htt', ht', ht'0⟩,
apply measure_mono_null ((inter_subset _ _ _).1 htt'),
rw [restrict_apply (hs.compl.union ht'), union_inter_distrib_right, compl_inter_self,
set.empty_union],
exact measure_mono_null (inter_subset_left _ _) ht'0
end
@[simp] lemma restrict_eq_zero {s} : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
by rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
@[simp] lemma restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 := ext $ λ s hs, by simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ := ext $ λ s hs, by simp [hs]
lemma restrict_union_apply {s s' t : set α} (h : disjoint (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')) (hs : is_measurable s)
(hs' : is_measurable s') (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ s') t = μ.restrict s t + μ.restrict s' t :=
begin
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, set.inter_union_distrib_left],
exact measure_union h (ht.inter hs) (ht.inter hs'),
end
lemma restrict_union {s t : set α} (h : disjoint s t) (hs : is_measurable s)
(ht : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
ext $ λ t' ht', restrict_union_apply (h.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right) hs ht ht'
lemma restrict_union_add_inter {s t : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
begin
ext1 u hu,
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left],
convert measure_union_add_inter (hu.inter hs) (hu.inter ht) using 3,
rw [set.inter_left_comm (u ∩ s), set.inter_assoc, ← set.inter_assoc u u, set.inter_self]
end
@[simp] lemma restrict_add_restrict_compl {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ :=
by rw [← restrict_union (disjoint_compl_right _) hs hs.compl, union_compl_self, restrict_univ]
@[simp] lemma restrict_compl_add_restrict {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ :=
by rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
lemma restrict_union_le (s s' : set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
begin
intros t ht,
suffices : μ (t ∩ s ∪ t ∩ s') ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t ∩ s'),
by simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left],
apply measure_union_le
end
lemma restrict_Union_apply {ι} [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α} (hd : pairwise (disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) {t : set α} (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
begin
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_Union],
exact measure_Union (λ i j hij, (hd i j hij).mono inf_le_right inf_le_right)
(λ i, ht.inter (hm i))
end
lemma restrict_Union_apply_eq_supr {ι} [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α}
(hm : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) (hd : directed (⊆) s) {t : set α} (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
begin
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_Union],
rw [measure_Union_eq_supr],
exacts [λ i, ht.inter (hm i), hd.mono_comp _ (λ s₁ s₂, inter_subset_inter_right _)]
end
lemma restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) {s : set β} (hs : is_measurable s) :
(map f μ).restrict s = map f (μ.restrict $ f ⁻¹' s) :=
ext $ λ t ht, by simp [*, hf ht]
lemma map_comap_subtype_coe {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
(map (coe : s → α)).comp (comap coe) = restrictₗ s :=
linear_map.ext $ λ μ, ext $ λ t ht,
by rw [restrictₗ_apply, restrict_apply ht, linear_map.comp_apply,
map_apply measurable_subtype_coe ht,
comap_apply (coe : s → α) subtype.val_injective (λ _, hs.subtype_image) _
(measurable_subtype_coe ht), subtype.image_preimage_coe]
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono] lemma restrict_mono ⦃s s' : set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) :
μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
assume t ht,
calc μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) : restrict_apply ht
... ≤ μ (t ∩ s') : measure_mono $ inter_subset_inter_right _ hs
... ≤ ν (t ∩ s') : le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
... = ν.restrict s' t : (restrict_apply ht).symm
lemma restrict_le_self {s} : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
assume t ht,
calc μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) : restrict_apply ht
... ≤ μ t : measure_mono $ inter_subset_left t s
lemma restrict_congr_meas {s} (hs : is_measurable s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, is_measurable t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨λ H t hts ht,
by rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht],
λ H, ext $ λ t ht,
by rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ (inter_subset_right _ _) (ht.inter hs)]⟩
lemma restrict_congr_mono {s t} (hs : s ⊆ t) (hm : is_measurable s)
(h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
by rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hs, ← restrict_restrict hm, h, restrict_restrict hm]
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
lemma restrict_union_congr {s t : set α} (hsm : is_measurable s) (htm : is_measurable t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨restrict_congr_mono (subset_union_left _ _) hsm h,
restrict_congr_mono (subset_union_right _ _) htm h⟩, _⟩,
simp only [restrict_congr_meas, hsm, htm, hsm.union htm],
rintros ⟨hs, ht⟩ u hu hum,
rw [measure_eq_inter_diff hum hsm, measure_eq_inter_diff hum hsm,
hs _ (inter_subset_right _ _) (hum.inter hsm),
ht _ (diff_subset_iff.2 hu) (hum.diff hsm)]
end
variables {ι : Type*}
lemma restrict_finset_bUnion_congr {s : finset ι} {t : ι → set α}
(htm : ∀ i ∈ s, is_measurable (t i)) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction_on with i s hi hs, { simp },
simp only [finset.mem_insert, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at htm ⊢,
simp only [finset.bUnion_insert, ← hs htm.2],
exact restrict_union_congr htm.1 (is_measurable.bUnion s.countable_to_set htm.2)
end
lemma restrict_Union_congr [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α} (hm : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔
∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h i, restrict_congr_mono (subset_Union _ _) (hm i) h, λ h, _⟩,
ext1 t ht,
have M : ∀ t : finset ι, is_measurable (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) :=
λ t, is_measurable.bUnion t.countable_to_set (λ i _, hm i),
have D : directed (⊆) (λ t : finset ι, ⋃ i ∈ t, s i) :=
directed_of_sup (λ t₁ t₂ ht, bUnion_subset_bUnion_left ht),
rw [Union_eq_Union_finset],
simp only [restrict_Union_apply_eq_supr M D ht,
(restrict_finset_bUnion_congr (λ i hi, hm i)).2 (λ i hi, h i)],
end
lemma restrict_bUnion_congr {s : set ι} {t : ι → set α} (hc : countable s)
(htm : ∀ i ∈ s, is_measurable (t i)) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) :=
begin
simp only [bUnion_eq_Union, set_coe.forall'] at htm ⊢,
haveI := hc.to_encodable,
exact restrict_Union_congr htm
end
lemma restrict_sUnion_congr {S : set (set α)} (hc : countable S) (hm : ∀ s ∈ S, is_measurable s) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
by rw [sUnion_eq_bUnion, restrict_bUnion_congr hc hm]
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
lemma ext_iff_of_Union_eq_univ [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α}
(hm : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) (hs : (⋃ i, s i) = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) :=
by rw [← restrict_Union_congr hm, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ext_iff_of_Union_eq_univ ↔ _ measure_theory.measure.ext_of_Union_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `bUnion`). -/
lemma ext_iff_of_bUnion_eq_univ {S : set ι} {s : ι → set α} (hc : countable S)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ S, is_measurable (s i)) (hs : (⋃ i ∈ S, s i) = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) :=
by rw [← restrict_bUnion_congr hc hm, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ext_iff_of_bUnion_eq_univ ↔ _ measure_theory.measure.ext_of_bUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
lemma ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : set (set α)} (hc : countable S)
(hm : ∀ s ∈ S, is_measurable s) (hs : (⋃₀ S) = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_bUnion_eq_univ hc hm $ by rwa ← sUnion_eq_bUnion
alias ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ ↔ _ measure_theory.measure.ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ
open measurable_space
lemma ext_of_generate_from_of_cover {S T : set (set α)}
(h_gen : ‹_› = generate_from S) (hc : countable T)
(h_inter : is_pi_system S)
(hm : ∀ t ∈ T, is_measurable t) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t < ⊤)
(ST_eq : ∀ (t ∈ T) (s ∈ S), μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) :
μ = ν :=
begin
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hm hU (λ t ht, _),
ext1 u hu,
simp only [restrict_apply hu],
refine induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter _ (ST_eq t ht) _ _ hu,
{ simp only [set.empty_inter, measure_empty] },
{ intros v hv hvt,
have := T_eq t ht,
rw [set.inter_comm] at hvt ⊢,
rwa [measure_eq_inter_diff (hm _ ht) hv, measure_eq_inter_diff (hm _ ht) hv, ← hvt,
ennreal.add_right_inj] at this,
exact (measure_mono $ set.inter_subset_left _ _).trans_lt (htop t ht) },
{ intros f hfd hfm h_eq,
have : pairwise (disjoint on λ n, f n ∩ t) :=
λ m n hmn, (hfd m n hmn).mono (inter_subset_left _ _) (inter_subset_left _ _),
simp only [Union_inter, measure_Union this (λ n, is_measurable.inter (hfm n) (hm t ht)), h_eq] }
end
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on a increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `sUnion`. -/
lemma ext_of_generate_from_of_cover_subset {S T : set (set α)}
(h_gen : ‹_› = generate_from S)
(h_inter : is_pi_system S)
(h_sub : T ⊆ S) (hc : countable T) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ s ∈ T, μ s < ⊤)
(h_eq : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = ν s) :
μ = ν :=
begin
refine ext_of_generate_from_of_cover h_gen hc h_inter _ hU htop _ (λ t ht, h_eq t (h_sub ht)),
{ intros t ht, rw [h_gen], exact generate_measurable.basic _ (h_sub ht) },
{ intros t ht s hs, cases (s ∩ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with H H,
{ simp only [H, measure_empty] },
{ exact h_eq _ (h_inter _ _ hs (h_sub ht) H) } }
end
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on a increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `Union`. -/
lemma ext_of_generate_from_of_Union (C : set (set α)) (B : ℕ → set α)
(hA : ‹_› = generate_from C) (hC : is_pi_system C) (h1B : (⋃ i, B i) = univ)
(h2B : ∀ i, B i ∈ C) (hμB : ∀ i, μ (B i) < ⊤) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν :=
begin
refine measure.ext_of_generate_from_of_cover_subset hA hC _ (countable_range B) h1B _ h_eq,
{ rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩, apply h2B },
{ rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩, apply hμB }
end
/-- The dirac measure. -/
def dirac (a : α) : measure α :=
(outer_measure.dirac a).to_measure (by simp)
lemma dirac_apply' (a : α) {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
dirac a s = ⨆ h : a ∈ s, 1 :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
@[simp] lemma dirac_apply (a : α) {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
dirac a s = s.indicator 1 a :=
(dirac_apply' a hs).trans $ by { by_cases h : a ∈ s; simp [h] }
lemma dirac_apply_of_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ s) :
dirac a s = 1 :=
begin
rw [measure_eq_infi, infi_subtype', infi_subtype'],
convert infi_const,
{ ext1 ⟨⟨t, hst⟩, ht⟩,
dsimp only [subtype.coe_mk] at *,
simp only [dirac_apply _ ht, indicator_of_mem (hst h), pi.one_apply] },
{ exact ⟨⟨⟨set.univ, subset_univ _⟩, is_measurable.univ⟩⟩ }
end
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
def sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → measure α) : measure α :=
(outer_measure.sum (λ i, (f i).to_outer_measure)).to_measure $
le_trans
(by exact le_infi (λ i, le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory _))
(outer_measure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
@[simp] lemma sum_apply {ι : Type*} (f : ι → measure α) {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
lemma le_sum {ι : Type*} (μ : ι → measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
λ s hs, by simp only [sum_apply μ hs, ennreal.le_tsum i]
lemma restrict_Union {ι} [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α} (hd : pairwise (disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum (λ i, μ.restrict (s i)) :=
ext $ λ t ht, by simp only [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_Union_apply hd hm ht]
lemma restrict_Union_le {ι} [encodable ι] {s : ι → set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ≤ sum (λ i, μ.restrict (s i)) :=
begin
intros t ht,
suffices : μ (⋃ i, t ∩ s i) ≤ ∑' i, μ (t ∩ s i), by simpa [ht, inter_Union],
apply measure_Union_le
end
@[simp] lemma sum_bool (f : bool → measure α) : sum f = f tt + f ff :=
ext $ λ s hs, by simp [hs, tsum_fintype]
@[simp] lemma restrict_sum {ι : Type*} (μ : ι → measure α) {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum (λ i, (μ i).restrict s) :=
ext $ λ t ht, by simp only [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ht, ht.inter hs]
/-- Counting measure on any measurable space. -/
def count : measure α := sum dirac
lemma count_apply {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
count s = ∑' i : s, 1 :=
by simp only [count, sum_apply, hs, dirac_apply, ← tsum_subtype s 1, pi.one_apply]
@[simp] lemma count_apply_finset [measurable_singleton_class α] (s : finset α) :
count (↑s : set α) = s.card :=
calc count (↑s : set α) = ∑' i : (↑s : set α), (1 : α → ennreal) i : count_apply s.is_measurable
... = ∑ i in s, 1 : s.tsum_subtype 1
... = s.card : by simp
lemma count_apply_finite [measurable_singleton_class α] (s : set α) (hs : finite s) :
count s = hs.to_finset.card :=
by rw [← count_apply_finset, finite.coe_to_finset]
/-- `count` measure evaluates to infinity at infinite sets. -/
lemma count_apply_infinite [measurable_singleton_class α] {s : set α} (hs : s.infinite) :
count s = ⊤ :=
begin
by_contra H,
rcases ennreal.exists_nat_gt H with ⟨n, hn⟩,
rcases hs.exists_subset_card_eq n with ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩,
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono ht) hn,
simpa [lt_irrefl] using this
end
@[simp] lemma count_apply_eq_top [measurable_singleton_class α] {s : set α} :
count s = ⊤ ↔ s.infinite :=
begin
by_cases hs : s.finite,
{ simp [set.infinite, hs, count_apply_finite] },
{ change s.infinite at hs,
simp [hs, count_apply_infinite] }
end
@[simp] lemma count_apply_lt_top [measurable_singleton_class α] {s : set α} :
count s < ⊤ ↔ s.finite :=
calc count s < ⊤ ↔ count s ≠ ⊤ : lt_top_iff_ne_top
... ↔ ¬s.infinite : not_congr count_apply_eq_top
... ↔ s.finite : not_not
open measurable_space
/-! ### The almost everywhere filter -/
/-- The “almost everywhere” filter of co-null sets. -/
def ae (μ : measure α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | μ sᶜ = 0},
univ_sets := by simp,
inter_sets := λ s t hs ht, by simp only [compl_inter, mem_set_of_eq];
exact measure_union_null hs ht,
sets_of_superset := λ s t hs hst, measure_mono_null (set.compl_subset_compl.2 hst) hs }
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite (μ : measure α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | μ sᶜ < ⊤},
univ_sets := by simp,
inter_sets := λ s t hs ht, by { simp only [compl_inter, mem_set_of_eq],
calc μ (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ) ≤ μ sᶜ + μ tᶜ : measure_union_le _ _
... < ⊤ : ennreal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩ },
sets_of_superset := λ s t hs hst, lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono $ compl_subset_compl.2 hst) hs }
lemma mem_cofinite {s : set α} : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ⊤ := iff.rfl
lemma compl_mem_cofinite {s : set α} : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ⊤ :=
by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
lemma eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ {x | ¬p x} < ⊤ := iff.rfl
end measure
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
notation `∀ᵐ` binders ` ∂` μ `, ` r:(scoped P, filter.eventually P (measure.ae μ)) := r
notation f ` =ᵐ[`:50 μ:50 `] `:0 g:50 := f =ᶠ[measure.ae μ] g
notation f ` ≤ᵐ[`:50 μ:50 `] `:0 g:50 := f ≤ᶠ[measure.ae μ] g
lemma mem_ae_iff {s : set α} : s ∈ μ.ae ↔ μ sᶜ = 0 := iff.rfl
lemma ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᵐ a ∂ μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | ¬ p a } = 0 := iff.rfl
lemma compl_mem_ae_iff {s : set α} : sᶜ ∈ μ.ae ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [mem_ae_iff, compl_compl]
lemma measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem {s : set α} : μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ᵐ a ∂ μ, a ∉ s :=
compl_mem_ae_iff.symm
@[simp] lemma ae_eq_bot : μ.ae = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 :=
by rw [← empty_in_sets_eq_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure.measure_univ_eq_zero]
lemma ae_of_all {p : α → Prop} (μ : measure α) : (∀a, p a) → ∀ᵐ a ∂ μ, p a :=
eventually_of_forall
@[mono] lemma ae_mono {μ ν : measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ.ae ≤ ν.ae :=
λ s hs, bot_unique $ trans_rel_left (≤) (measure.le_iff'.1 h _) hs
instance : countable_Inter_filter μ.ae :=
⟨begin
intros S hSc hS,
simp only [mem_ae_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image, bUnion_eq_Union] at hS ⊢,
haveI := hSc.to_encodable,
exact measure_Union_null (subtype.forall.2 hS)
end⟩
instance ae_is_measurably_generated : is_measurably_generated μ.ae :=
⟨λ s hs, let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_is_measurable_superset_of_measure_eq_zero hs in
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
lemma ae_all_iff {ι : Type*} [encodable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ a ∂ μ, ∀i, p a i) ↔ (∀i, ∀ᵐ a ∂ μ, p a i) :=
eventually_countable_forall
lemma ae_ball_iff {ι} {S : set ι} (hS : countable S) {p : Π (x : α) (i ∈ S), Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, ∀ i ∈ S, p x i ‹_›) ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, ∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, p x i ‹_› :=
eventually_countable_ball hS
lemma ae_eq_refl (f : α → β) : f =ᵐ[μ] f := eventually_eq.refl _ _
lemma ae_eq_symm {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : g =ᵐ[μ] f :=
h.symm
lemma ae_eq_trans {f g h: α → β} (h₁ : f =ᵐ[μ] g) (h₂ : g =ᵐ[μ] h) :
f =ᵐ[μ] h :=
h₁.trans h₂
lemma ae_eq_empty {s : set α} : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : set α) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
eventually_eq_empty.trans $ by simp [ae_iff]
lemma ae_le_set {s t : set α} : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
calc s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → x ∈ t : iff.rfl
... ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 : by simp [ae_iff]; refl
lemma union_ae_eq_right {s t : set α} :
(s ∪ t : set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
by simp [eventually_le_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set, union_diff_right,
diff_eq_empty.2 (set.subset_union_right _ _)]
lemma diff_ae_eq_self {s t : set α} :
(s \ t : set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ μ (s ∩ t) = 0 :=
by simp [eventually_le_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set, diff_diff_right,
diff_diff, diff_eq_empty.2 (set.subset_union_right _ _)]
lemma mem_ae_map_iff [measurable_space β] {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f)
{s : set β} (hs : is_measurable s) :
s ∈ (measure.map f μ).ae ↔ (f ⁻¹' s) ∈ μ.ae :=
by simp only [mem_ae_iff, measure.map_apply hf hs.compl, preimage_compl]
lemma ae_map_iff [measurable_space β] {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f)
{p : β → Prop} (hp : is_measurable {x | p x}) :
(∀ᵐ y ∂ (measure.map f μ), p y) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, p (f x) :=
mem_ae_map_iff hf hp
lemma ae_restrict_iff {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} (hp : is_measurable {x | p x}) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂(μ.restrict s), p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
begin
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_set_of, measure.restrict_apply hp.compl],
congr' with x, simp [and_comm]
end
lemma ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : ennreal) : ∀ᵐ x ∂(c • μ), p x :=
ae_iff.2 $ by rw [measure.smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, mul_zero]
lemma ae_add_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {ν} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ + ν, p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, p x :=
add_eq_zero_iff
@[simp] lemma ae_restrict_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s):
(μ.restrict s).ae = μ.ae ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
begin
ext t,
simp only [mem_inf_principal, mem_ae_iff, measure.restrict_apply_eq_zero' hs, compl_set_of,
not_imp, and_comm (_ ∈ s)],
refl
end
@[simp] lemma ae_restrict_eq_bot {s} : (μ.restrict s).ae = ⊥ ↔ μ s = 0 :=
ae_eq_bot.trans measure.restrict_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma ae_restrict_ne_bot {s} : (μ.restrict s).ae.ne_bot ↔ 0 < μ s :=
(not_congr ae_restrict_eq_bot).trans zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.symm
/-- A version of the Borel-Cantelli lemma: if sᵢ is a sequence of measurable sets such that
∑ μ sᵢ exists, then for almost all x, x does not belong to almost all sᵢ. -/
lemma ae_eventually_not_mem {s : ℕ → set α} (hs : ∀ i, is_measurable (s i))
(hs' : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, ∀ᶠ n in at_top, x ∉ s n :=
begin
refine measure_mono_null _ (measure_limsup_eq_zero hs hs'),
rw ←set.le_eq_subset,
refine le_Inf (λ t ht x hx, _),
simp only [le_eq_subset, not_exists, eventually_map, exists_prop, ge_iff_le, mem_set_of_eq,
eventually_at_top, mem_compl_eq, not_forall, not_not_mem] at hx ht,
rcases ht with ⟨i, hi⟩,
rcases hx i with ⟨j, ⟨hj, hj'⟩⟩,
exact hi j hj hj'
end
lemma mem_dirac_ae_iff {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
s ∈ (measure.dirac a).ae ↔ a ∈ s :=
by by_cases a ∈ s; simp [mem_ae_iff, measure.dirac_apply, hs.compl, indicator_apply, *]
lemma eventually_dirac {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (hp : is_measurable {x | p x}) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂(measure.dirac a), p x) ↔ p a :=
mem_dirac_ae_iff hp
lemma eventually_eq_dirac [measurable_space β] [measurable_singleton_class β] {a : α} {f : α → β}
(hf : measurable f) :
f =ᵐ[measure.dirac a] const α (f a) :=
(eventually_dirac $ show is_measurable (f ⁻¹' {f a}), from hf $ is_measurable_singleton _).2 rfl
lemma dirac_ae_eq [measurable_singleton_class α] (a : α) : (measure.dirac a).ae = pure a :=
begin
ext s,
simp only [mem_ae_iff, mem_pure_sets],
by_cases ha : a ∈ s,
{ simp only [ha, iff_true],
rw [← set.singleton_subset_iff, ← compl_subset_compl] at ha,
refine measure_mono_null ha _,
simp [measure.dirac_apply a (is_measurable_singleton a).compl] },
{ simp only [ha, iff_false, measure.dirac_apply_of_mem (mem_compl ha)],
exact one_ne_zero }
end
lemma eventually_eq_dirac' [measurable_singleton_class α] {a : α} (f : α → β) :
f =ᵐ[measure.dirac a] const α (f a) :=
by { rw [dirac_ae_eq], show f a = f a, refl }
lemma measure_diff_of_ae_le {s t : set α} (H : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) :
μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
flip measure_mono_null H $ λ x hx H, hx.2 (H hx.1)
/-- If `s ⊆ t` modulo a set of measure `0`, then `μ s ≤ μ t`. -/
lemma measure_mono_ae {s t : set α} (H : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) :
μ s ≤ μ t :=
calc μ s ≤ μ (s ∪ t) : measure_mono $ subset_union_left s t
... = μ (t ∪ s \ t) : by rw [union_diff_self, set.union_comm]
... ≤ μ t + μ (s \ t) : measure_union_le _ _
... = μ t : by rw [measure_diff_of_ae_le H, add_zero]
alias measure_mono_ae ← filter.eventually_le.measure_le
/-- If two sets are equal modulo a set of measure zero, then `μ s = μ t`. -/
lemma measure_congr {s t : set α} (H : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ s = μ t :=
le_antisymm H.le.measure_le H.symm.le.measure_le
lemma restrict_mono_ae {s t : set α} (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
begin
intros u hu,
simp only [measure.restrict_apply hu],
exact measure_mono_ae (h.mono $ λ x hx, and.imp id hx)
end
lemma restrict_congr_set {s t : set α} (H : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae H.le) (restrict_mono_ae H.symm.le)
/-- A measure `μ` is called a probability measure if `μ univ = 1`. -/
class probability_measure (μ : measure α) : Prop := (measure_univ : μ univ = 1)
/-- A measure `μ` is called finite if `μ univ < ⊤`. -/
class finite_measure (μ : measure α) : Prop := (measure_univ_lt_top : μ univ < ⊤)
instance restrict.finite_measure (μ : measure α) {s : set α} [hs : fact (μ s < ⊤)] :
finite_measure (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨by simp [hs.elim]⟩
/-- Measure `μ` *has no atoms* if the measure of each singleton is zero.
NB: Wikipedia assumes that for any measurable set `s` with positive `μ`-measure,
there exists a measurable `t ⊆ s` such that `0 < μ t < μ s`. While this implies `μ {x} = 0`,
the converse is not true. -/
class has_no_atoms (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
(measure_singleton : ∀ x, μ {x} = 0)
export probability_measure (measure_univ) has_no_atoms (measure_singleton)
attribute [simp] measure_singleton
lemma measure_lt_top (μ : measure α) [finite_measure μ] (s : set α) : μ s < ⊤ :=
(measure_mono (subset_univ s)).trans_lt finite_measure.measure_univ_lt_top
lemma measure_ne_top (μ : measure α) [finite_measure μ] (s : set α) : μ s ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top μ s)
@[priority 100]
instance probability_measure.to_finite_measure (μ : measure α) [probability_measure μ] :
finite_measure μ :=
⟨by simp only [measure_univ, ennreal.one_lt_top]⟩
lemma probability_measure.ne_zero (μ : measure α) [probability_measure μ] : μ ≠ 0 :=
mt measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.2 $ by simp [measure_univ]
section no_atoms
variables [has_no_atoms μ]
lemma measure_countable {s : set α} (h : countable s) : μ s = 0 :=
begin
rw [← bUnion_of_singleton s, ← le_zero_iff_eq],
refine le_trans (measure_bUnion_le h _) _,
simp
end
lemma measure_finite {s : set α} (h : s.finite) : μ s = 0 :=
measure_countable h.countable
lemma measure_finset (s : finset α) : μ ↑s = 0 :=
measure_finite s.finite_to_set
lemma insert_ae_eq_self (a : α) (s : set α) :
(insert a s : set α) =ᵐ[μ] s :=
union_ae_eq_right.2 $ measure_mono_null (diff_subset _ _) (measure_singleton _)
variables [partial_order α] {a b : α}
lemma Iio_ae_eq_Iic : Iio a =ᵐ[μ] Iic a :=
by simp only [← Iic_diff_right, diff_ae_eq_self,
measure_mono_null (set.inter_subset_right _ _) (measure_singleton a)]
lemma Ioi_ae_eq_Ici : Ioi a =ᵐ[μ] Ici a :=
@Iio_ae_eq_Iic (order_dual α) ‹_› ‹_› _ _ _
lemma Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter Iio_ae_eq_Iic
lemma Ioc_ae_eq_Icc : Ioc a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
Ioi_ae_eq_Ici.inter (ae_eq_refl _)
lemma Ioo_ae_eq_Ico : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ico a b :=
Ioi_ae_eq_Ici.inter (ae_eq_refl _)
lemma Ioo_ae_eq_Icc : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
Ioi_ae_eq_Ici.inter Iio_ae_eq_Iic
lemma Ico_ae_eq_Icc : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter Iio_ae_eq_Iic
lemma Ico_ae_eq_Ioc : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
Ioo_ae_eq_Ico.symm.trans Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc
end no_atoms
/-- A measure is called finite at filter `f` if it is finite at some set `s ∈ f`.
Equivalently, it is eventually finite at `s` in `f.lift' powerset`. -/
def measure.finite_at_filter (μ : measure α) (f : filter α) : Prop := ∃ s ∈ f, μ s < ⊤
lemma finite_at_filter_of_finite (μ : measure α) [finite_measure μ] (f : filter α) :
μ.finite_at_filter f :=
⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, measure_lt_top μ univ⟩
lemma measure.finite_at_bot (μ : measure α) : μ.finite_at_filter ⊥ :=
⟨∅, mem_bot_sets, by simp only [measure_empty, with_top.zero_lt_top]⟩
/-- A measure `μ` is called σ-finite if there is a countable collection of sets
`{ A i | i ∈ ℕ }` such that `μ (A i) < ⊤` and `⋃ i, A i = s`. -/
class sigma_finite (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
(exists_finite_spanning_sets :
∃ s : ℕ → set α,
(∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) ∧
(∀ i, μ (s i) < ⊤) ∧
(⋃ i, s i) = univ)
lemma exists_finite_spanning_sets (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] :
∃ s : ℕ → set α,
(∀ i, is_measurable (s i)) ∧
(∀ i, μ (s i) < ⊤) ∧
(⋃ i, s i) = univ :=
sigma_finite.exists_finite_spanning_sets
/-- A noncomputable way to get a monotone collection of sets that span `univ` and have finite
measure using `classical.some`. This definition satisfies monotonicity in addition to all other
properties in `sigma_finite`. -/
def spanning_sets (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] (i : ℕ) : set α :=
accumulate (classical.some $ exists_finite_spanning_sets μ) i
lemma monotone_spanning_sets (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] :
monotone (spanning_sets μ) :=
monotone_accumulate
lemma is_measurable_spanning_sets (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] (i : ℕ) :
is_measurable (spanning_sets μ i) :=
is_measurable.Union $ λ j, is_measurable.Union_Prop $
λ hij, (classical.some_spec $ exists_finite_spanning_sets μ).1 j
lemma measure_spanning_sets_lt_top (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] (i : ℕ) :
μ (spanning_sets μ i) < ⊤ :=
measure_bUnion_lt_top (finite_le_nat i) $
λ j _, (classical.some_spec $ exists_finite_spanning_sets μ).2.1 j
lemma Union_spanning_sets (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] :
(⋃ i : ℕ, spanning_sets μ i) = univ :=
by simp_rw [spanning_sets, Union_accumulate,
(classical.some_spec $ exists_finite_spanning_sets μ).2.2]
namespace measure
lemma supr_restrict_spanning_sets {μ : measure α} [sigma_finite μ] {s : set α}
(hs : is_measurable s) :
(⨆ i, μ.restrict (spanning_sets μ i) s) = μ s :=
begin
convert (restrict_Union_apply_eq_supr (is_measurable_spanning_sets μ) _ hs).symm,
{ simp [Union_spanning_sets] },
{ exact directed_of_sup (monotone_spanning_sets μ) }
end
end measure
open measure
/-- Every finite measure is σ-finite. -/
@[priority 100]
instance finite_measure.to_sigma_finite (μ : measure α) [finite_measure μ] : sigma_finite μ :=
⟨⟨λ _, univ, λ _, is_measurable.univ, λ _, measure_lt_top μ _, Union_const _⟩⟩
instance restrict.sigma_finite (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite μ] (s : set α) :
sigma_finite (μ.restrict s) :=
begin
refine ⟨⟨spanning_sets μ, is_measurable_spanning_sets μ, λ i, _, Union_spanning_sets μ⟩⟩,
rw [restrict_apply (is_measurable_spanning_sets μ i)],
exact (measure_mono $ inter_subset_left _ _).trans_lt (measure_spanning_sets_lt_top μ i)
end
/-- A measure is called locally finite if it is finite in some neighborhood of each point. -/
class locally_finite_measure [topological_space α] (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
(finite_at_nhds : ∀ x, μ.finite_at_filter (𝓝 x))
@[priority 100]
instance finite_measure.to_locally_finite_measure [topological_space α] (μ : measure α)
[finite_measure μ] :
locally_finite_measure μ :=
⟨λ x, finite_at_filter_of_finite _ _⟩
lemma measure.finite_at_nhds [topological_space α] (μ : measure α)
[locally_finite_measure μ] (x : α) :
μ.finite_at_filter (𝓝 x) :=
locally_finite_measure.finite_at_nhds x
open measurable_space
/-- Two finite measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra
(and `univ`). -/
lemma ext_of_generate_finite (C : set (set α)) (hA : _inst_1 = generate_from C)
(hC : is_pi_system C) {μ ν : measure α}
[finite_measure μ] [finite_measure ν] (hμν : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) (h_univ : μ univ = ν univ) :
μ = ν :=
begin
ext1 s hs,
refine induction_on_inter hA hC (by simp) hμν _ _ hs,
{ rintros t h1t h2t, change is_measurable t at h1t, simp [measure_compl, measure_lt_top, *] },
{ rintros f h1f h2f h3f, simp [measure_Union, is_measurable.Union, *] }
end
namespace measure
namespace finite_at_filter
variables {ν : measure α} {f g : filter α}
lemma filter_mono (h : f ≤ g) : μ.finite_at_filter g → μ.finite_at_filter f :=
λ ⟨s, hs, hμ⟩, ⟨s, h hs, hμ⟩
lemma inf_of_left (h : μ.finite_at_filter f) : μ.finite_at_filter (f ⊓ g) :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma inf_of_right (h : μ.finite_at_filter g) : μ.finite_at_filter (f ⊓ g) :=
h.filter_mono inf_le_right
@[simp] lemma inf_ae_iff : μ.finite_at_filter (f ⊓ μ.ae) ↔ μ.finite_at_filter f :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, h.filter_mono inf_le_left⟩,
rintros ⟨s, ⟨t, ht, u, hu, hs⟩, hμ⟩,
suffices : μ t ≤ μ s, from ⟨t, ht, this.trans_lt hμ⟩,
exact measure_mono_ae (mem_sets_of_superset hu (λ x hu ht, hs ⟨ht, hu⟩))
end
alias inf_ae_iff ↔ measure_theory.measure.finite_at_filter.of_inf_ae _
lemma filter_mono_ae (h : f ⊓ μ.ae ≤ g) (hg : μ.finite_at_filter g) : μ.finite_at_filter f :=
inf_ae_iff.1 (hg.filter_mono h)
protected lemma measure_mono (h : μ ≤ ν) : ν.finite_at_filter f → μ.finite_at_filter f :=
λ ⟨s, hs, hν⟩, ⟨s, hs, (measure.le_iff'.1 h s).trans_lt hν⟩
@[mono] protected lemma mono (hf : f ≤ g) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) :
ν.finite_at_filter g → μ.finite_at_filter f :=
λ h, (h.filter_mono hf).measure_mono hμ
protected lemma eventually (h : μ.finite_at_filter f) : ∀ᶠ s in f.lift' powerset, μ s < ⊤ :=
(eventually_lift'_powerset' $ λ s t hst ht, (measure_mono hst).trans_lt ht).2 h
lemma filter_sup : μ.finite_at_filter f → μ.finite_at_filter g → μ.finite_at_filter (f ⊔ g) :=
λ ⟨s, hsf, hsμ⟩ ⟨t, htg, htμ⟩,
⟨s ∪ t, union_mem_sup hsf htg, (measure_union_le s t).trans_lt (ennreal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)⟩
end finite_at_filter
lemma finite_at_nhds_within [topological_space α] (μ : measure α) [locally_finite_measure μ]
(x : α) (s : set α) :
μ.finite_at_filter (𝓝[s] x) :=
(finite_at_nhds μ x).inf_of_left
@[simp] lemma finite_at_principal {s : set α} : μ.finite_at_filter (𝓟 s) ↔ μ s < ⊤ :=
⟨λ ⟨t, ht, hμ⟩, (measure_mono ht).trans_lt hμ, λ h, ⟨s, mem_principal_self s, h⟩⟩
end measure
end measure_theory
section is_complete
open measure_theory measure_theory.measure
/-- A measure is complete if every null set is also measurable.
A null set is a subset of a measurable set with measure `0`.
Since every measure is defined as a special case of an outer measure, we can more simply state
that a set `s` is null if `μ s = 0`. -/
@[class] def measure_theory.measure.is_complete {α} {_:measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
∀ s, μ s = 0 → is_measurable s
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α)
/-- A set is null measurable if it is the union of a null set and a measurable set. -/
def is_null_measurable (s : set α) : Prop :=
∃ t z, s = t ∪ z ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ z = 0
theorem is_null_measurable_iff {μ : measure α} {s : set α} :
is_null_measurable μ s ↔
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨t, z, rfl, ht, hz⟩,
refine ⟨t, set.subset_union_left _ _, ht, measure_mono_null _ hz⟩,
simp [union_diff_left, diff_subset] },
{ rintro ⟨t, st, ht, hz⟩,
exact ⟨t, _, (union_diff_cancel st).symm, ht, hz⟩ }
end
theorem is_null_measurable_measure_eq {μ : measure α} {s t : set α}
(st : t ⊆ s) (hz : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ s = μ t :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (measure_mono st),
have := measure_union_le t (s \ t),
rw [union_diff_cancel st, hz] at this, simpa
end
theorem is_measurable.is_null_measurable
{s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) : is_null_measurable μ s :=
⟨s, ∅, by simp, hs, μ.empty⟩
theorem is_null_measurable_of_complete [c : μ.is_complete]
{s : set α} : is_null_measurable μ s ↔ is_measurable s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨t, z, rfl, ht, hz⟩; exact
is_measurable.union ht (c _ hz),
λ h, h.is_null_measurable _⟩
variables {μ}
theorem is_null_measurable.union_null {s z : set α}
(hs : is_null_measurable μ s) (hz : μ z = 0) :
is_null_measurable μ (s ∪ z) :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨t, z', rfl, ht, hz'⟩,
exact ⟨t, z' ∪ z, set.union_assoc _ _ _, ht, le_zero_iff_eq.1
(le_trans (measure_union_le _ _) $ by simp [hz, hz'])⟩
end
theorem null_is_null_measurable {z : set α}
(hz : μ z = 0) : is_null_measurable μ z :=
by simpa using (is_measurable.empty.is_null_measurable _).union_null hz
theorem is_null_measurable.Union_nat {s : ℕ → set α}
(hs : ∀ i, is_null_measurable μ (s i)) :
is_null_measurable μ (Union s) :=
begin
choose t ht using assume i, is_null_measurable_iff.1 (hs i),
simp [forall_and_distrib] at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨st, ht, hz⟩,
refine is_null_measurable_iff.2
⟨Union t, Union_subset_Union st, is_measurable.Union ht,
measure_mono_null _ (measure_Union_null hz)⟩,
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← Union_union_distrib],
exact Union_subset_Union (λ i, by rw ← diff_subset_iff)
end
theorem is_measurable.diff_null {s z : set α}
(hs : is_measurable s) (hz : μ z = 0) :
is_null_measurable μ (s \ z) :=
begin
rw measure_eq_infi at hz,
choose f hf using show ∀ q : {q:ℚ//q>0}, ∃ t:set α,
z ⊆ t ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ t < (nnreal.of_real q.1 : ennreal),
{ rintro ⟨ε, ε0⟩,
have : 0 < (nnreal.of_real ε : ennreal), { simpa using ε0 },
rw ← hz at this, simpa [infi_lt_iff] },
refine is_null_measurable_iff.2 ⟨s \ Inter f,
diff_subset_diff_right (subset_Inter (λ i, (hf i).1)),
hs.diff (is_measurable.Inter (λ i, (hf i).2.1)),
measure_mono_null _ (le_zero_iff_eq.1 $ le_of_not_lt $ λ h, _)⟩,
{ exact Inter f },
{ rw [diff_subset_iff, diff_union_self],
exact subset.trans (diff_subset _ _) (subset_union_left _ _) },
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h with ⟨ε, ε0', ε0, h⟩,
simp at ε0,
apply not_le_of_lt (lt_trans (hf ⟨ε, ε0⟩).2.2 h),
exact measure_mono (Inter_subset _ _)
end
theorem is_null_measurable.diff_null {s z : set α}
(hs : is_null_measurable μ s) (hz : μ z = 0) :
is_null_measurable μ (s \ z) :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨t, z', rfl, ht, hz'⟩,
rw [set.union_diff_distrib],
exact (ht.diff_null hz).union_null (measure_mono_null (diff_subset _ _) hz')
end
theorem is_null_measurable.compl {s : set α}
(hs : is_null_measurable μ s) :
is_null_measurable μ sᶜ :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨t, z, rfl, ht, hz⟩,
rw compl_union,
exact ht.compl.diff_null hz
end
/-- The measurable space of all null measurable sets. -/
def null_measurable {α : Type u} [measurable_space α]
(μ : measure α) : measurable_space α :=
{ is_measurable' := is_null_measurable μ,
is_measurable_empty := is_measurable.empty.is_null_measurable _,
is_measurable_compl := λ s hs, hs.compl,
is_measurable_Union := λ f, is_null_measurable.Union_nat }
/-- Given a measure we can complete it to a (complete) measure on all null measurable sets. -/
def completion {α : Type u} [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α) :
@measure_theory.measure α (null_measurable μ) :=
{ to_outer_measure := μ.to_outer_measure,
m_Union := λ s hs hd, show μ (Union s) = ∑' i, μ (s i), begin
choose t ht using assume i, is_null_measurable_iff.1 (hs i),
simp [forall_and_distrib] at ht, rcases ht with ⟨st, ht, hz⟩,
rw is_null_measurable_measure_eq (Union_subset_Union st),
{ rw measure_Union _ ht,
{ congr, funext i,
exact (is_null_measurable_measure_eq (st i) (hz i)).symm },
{ rintro i j ij x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
exact hd i j ij ⟨st i h₁, st j h₂⟩ } },
{ refine measure_mono_null _ (measure_Union_null hz),
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← Union_union_distrib],
exact Union_subset_Union (λ i, by rw ← diff_subset_iff) }
end,
trimmed := begin
letI := null_measurable μ,
refine le_antisymm (λ s, _) (outer_measure.le_trim _),
rw outer_measure.trim_eq_infi,
dsimp,
clear _inst,
resetI,
rw measure_eq_infi s,
exact infi_le_infi (λ t, infi_le_infi $ λ st,
infi_le_infi2 $ λ ht, ⟨ht.is_null_measurable _, le_refl _⟩)
end }
instance completion.is_complete {α : Type u} [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α) :
(completion μ).is_complete :=
λ z hz, null_is_null_measurable hz
end is_complete
namespace measure_theory
/-- A measure space is a measurable space equipped with a
measure, referred to as `volume`. -/
class measure_space (α : Type*) extends measurable_space α :=
(volume : measure α)
export measure_space (volume)
/-- `volume` is the canonical measure on `α`. -/
add_decl_doc volume
section measure_space
variables {α : Type*} {ι : Type*} [measure_space α] {s₁ s₂ : set α}
notation `∀ᵐ` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, filter.eventually P (measure.ae volume)) := r
/-- The tactic `exact volume`, to be used in optional (`auto_param`) arguments. -/
meta def volume_tac : tactic unit := `[exact measure_theory.measure_space.volume]
end measure_space
end measure_theory
open measure_theory
namespace is_compact
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} {s : set α}
lemma finite_measure_of_nhds_within (hs : is_compact s) :
(∀ a ∈ s, μ.finite_at_filter (𝓝[s] a)) → μ s < ⊤ :=
by simpa only [← measure.compl_mem_cofinite, measure.finite_at_filter]
using hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhds_within
lemma finite_measure [locally_finite_measure μ] (hs : is_compact s) : μ s < ⊤ :=
hs.finite_measure_of_nhds_within $ λ a ha, μ.finite_at_nhds_within _ _
lemma measure_zero_of_nhds_within (hs : is_compact s) :
(∀ a ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a, μ t = 0) → μ s = 0 :=
by simpa only [← compl_mem_ae_iff] using hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhds_within
end is_compact
lemma metric.bounded.finite_measure {α : Type*} [metric_space α] [proper_space α]
[measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} [locally_finite_measure μ] {s : set α}
(hs : metric.bounded s) :
μ s < ⊤ :=
(measure_mono subset_closure).trans_lt (metric.compact_iff_closed_bounded.2
⟨is_closed_closure, metric.bounded_closure_of_bounded hs⟩).finite_measure
|
62bc2b7737874bf032a40886712d98e4e8ccf71e | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/rewriter16.lean | 596fb7a470c468d6a9c1b9120fc733e891daf08c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 124 | lean | import data.nat
open nat algebra
theorem tst (x : nat) (H1 : x = 0) : x = 0 :=
begin
rewrite *add_zero,
rewrite H1
end
|
c8dba7abc574cf689b513718818736814b0a6fd7 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/data/real/default.lean | 21e4a435fdfe8195337a46f0dfa4b80c1a224b29 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 202 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import .basic .order .division .complete
|
5c8a1b38f1e4bd509c407e001e0a2a824e75e138 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/1025.lean | 74d5023bceacc512cb0be7698e638bb572913b31 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 774 | lean | inductive Vector (α : Type u): Nat → Type u where
| nil : Vector α 0
| cons (head : α) (tail : Vector α n) : Vector α (n+1)
class Order (α : Type u) extends LE α, LT α, Max α where
ltDecidable : DecidableRel (@LT.lt α _)
max_def x y : max x y = if x < y then x else y
namespace Vector
def mem (a : α) : Vector α n → Prop
| nil => False
| cons b l => a = b ∨ mem a l
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (init : β) : Vector α n → β
| nil => init
| cons a l => f a (foldr f init l)
theorem foldr_max [Order β] {v: Vector α n} (f : α → β) (init : β)
(h: v.mem y):
f y ≤ v.foldr (λ x acc => max (f x) acc) init := by
induction v <;> simp only[foldr,Order.max_def]
· admit
· split <;> admit
end Vector
|
213478321511b5daa49ed7ace9800213146f1cff | 61ccc57f9d72048e493dd6969b56ebd7f0a8f9e8 | /src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean | 277d860c275381b18a1f1a7cde587987c2498b33 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jtristan/mathlib | 375b3c8682975df28f79f53efcb7c88840118467 | 8fa8f175271320d675277a672f59ec53abd62f10 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,072,765,551 | 1,588,255,641,000 | 1,588,255,641,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 34,946 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.analytic.basic
import combinatorics.composition
/-!
# Composition of analytic functions
in this file we prove that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The argument is the following. Assume `g z = ∑' qₙ (z, ..., z)` and `f y = ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y)`. Then
`g (f y) = ∑' qₙ (∑' pₖ (y, ..., y), ..., ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y))
= ∑' qₙ (p_{i₁} (y, ..., y), ..., p_{iₙ} (y, ..., y))`.
For each `n` and `i₁, ..., iₙ`, define a `i₁ + ... + iₙ` multilinear function mapping
`(y₀, ..., y_{i₁ + ... + iₙ - 1})` to
`qₙ (p_{i₁} (y₀, ..., y_{i₁-1}), p_{i₂} (y_{i₁}, ..., y_{i₁ + i₂ - 1}), ..., p_{iₙ} (....)))`.
Then `g ∘ f` is obtained by summing all these multilinear functions.
To formalize this, we use compositions of an integer `N`, i.e., its decompositions into
a sum `i₁ + ... + iₙ` of positive integers. Given such a composition `c` and two formal
multilinear series `q` and `p`, let `q.comp_along_composition p c` be the above multilinear
function. Then the `N`-th coefficient in the power series expansion of `g ∘ f` is the sum of these
terms over all `c : composition N`.
To complete the proof, we need to show that this power series has a positive radius of convergence.
This follows from the fact that `composition N` has cardinality `2^(N-1)` and estimates on
the norm of `qₙ` and `pₖ`, which give summability. We also need to show that it indeed converges to
`g ∘ f`. For this, we note that the composition of partial sums converges to `g ∘ f`, and that it
corresponds to a part of the whole sum, on a subset that increases to the whole space. By
summability of the norms, this implies the overall convergence.
## Main results
* `q.comp p` is the formal composition of the formal multilinear series `q` and `p`.
* `has_fpower_series_at.comp` states that if two functions `g` and `f` admit power series expansions
`q` and `p`, then `g ∘ f` admits a power series expansion given by `q.comp p`.
* `analytic_at.comp` states that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
## Implementation details
The main technical difficulty is to write down things. In particular, we need to define precisely
`q.comp_along_composition p c` and to show that it is indeed a continuous multilinear
function. This requires a whole interface built on the class `composition`. Once this is set,
the main difficulty is to reorder the sums, writing the composition of the partial sums as a sum
over some subset of `Σ n, composition n`. We need to check that the reordering is a bijection,
running over difficulties due to the dependent nature of the types under consideration, that are
controlled thanks to the interface for `composition`.
-/
noncomputable theory
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{G : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
open filter
open_locale topological_space classical
/-! ### Composing formal multilinear series -/
namespace formal_multilinear_series
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and the index `i` of a
block of `c`, we may define a function on `fin n → E` by picking the variables in the `i`-th block
of `n`, and applying the corresponding coefficient of `p` to these variables. This function is
called `p.apply_composition c v i` for `v : fin n → E` and `i : fin c.length`. -/
def apply_composition
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : composition n) :
(fin n → E) → (fin (c.length) → F) :=
λ v i, p (c.blocks_fun i) (v ∘ (c.embedding i))
/-- Technical lemma stating how `p.apply_composition` commutes with updating variables. This
will be the key point to show that functions constructed from `apply_composition` retain
multilinearity. -/
lemma apply_composition_update
(p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : composition n)
(j : fin n) (v : fin n → E) (z : E) :
p.apply_composition c (function.update v j z)
= function.update (p.apply_composition c v) (c.index j)
(p (c.blocks_fun (c.index j))
(function.update (v ∘ (c.embedding (c.index j))) (c.inv_embedding j) z)) :=
begin
ext k,
by_cases h : k = c.index j,
{ rw h,
let r : fin (c.blocks_fun (c.index j)) → fin n := c.embedding (c.index j),
simp only [function.update_same],
change p (c.blocks_fun (c.index j)) ((function.update v j z) ∘ r) = _,
let j' := c.inv_embedding j,
suffices B : (function.update v j z) ∘ r = function.update (v ∘ r) j' z,
by rw B,
suffices C : (function.update v (r j') z) ∘ r = function.update (v ∘ r) j' z,
by { convert C, exact c.embedding_comp_inv j },
exact function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding_inj _) _ _ },
{ simp only [h, function.update_eq_self, function.update_noteq, ne.def, not_false_iff],
let r : fin (c.blocks_fun k) → fin n := c.embedding k,
change p (c.blocks_fun k) ((function.update v j z) ∘ r) = p (c.blocks_fun k) (v ∘ r),
suffices B : (function.update v j z) ∘ r = v ∘ r, by rw B,
apply function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range,
rwa c.mem_range_embedding_iff' }
end
/-- Given two formal multilinear series `q` and `p` and a composition `c` of `n`, one may
form a multilinear map in `n` variables by applying the right coefficient of `p` to each block of
the composition, and then applying `q c.length` to the resulting vector. It is called
`q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p c`. This function admits a version as a continuous
multilinear map, called `q.comp_along_composition p c` below. -/
def comp_along_composition_multilinear {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) : multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, E) G :=
{ to_fun := λ v, q c.length (p.apply_composition c v),
add := λ v i x y, by simp [apply_composition_update],
smul := λ v i c x, by simp [apply_composition_update] }
/-- The norm of `q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `q` and `p`. -/
lemma comp_along_composition_multilinear_bound {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) (v : fin n → E) :
∥q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p c v∥
≤ ∥q c.length∥ * finset.univ.prod (λ i, ∥p (c.blocks_fun i)∥)
* (finset.univ : finset (fin n)).prod (λ i, ∥v i∥) :=
begin
-- main point: taking the product of the `∥v i∥` along each block, and then along all the blocks,
-- gives the product of all the `∥v i∥`, as the blocks form a partition of the indices.
have A : finset.univ.prod (λ (i : fin c.length),
finset.univ.prod (λ (j : fin (c.blocks_fun i)), ∥(v ∘ c.embedding i) j∥)) =
finset.prod finset.univ (λ (i : fin n), ∥v i∥),
{ -- The fact that a product over a partition gives the whole product is `finset.prod_bind`.
-- We just need to check its disjointness and totality assumptions.
have : (∀ (i : fin c.length), i ∈ finset.univ → ∀ (j : fin c.length), j ∈ finset.univ →
i ≠ j → disjoint (finset.univ.image (c.embedding i)) (finset.univ.image (c.embedding j))),
{ assume i hi j hj i_ne_j,
rw finset.disjoint_iff_disjoint_coe,
convert c.disjoint_range i_ne_j;
apply fintype.coe_image_univ },
have Z := @finset.prod_bind _ _ _ (λ j, ∥v j∥) _ _ finset.univ
(λ (i : fin c.length), finset.univ.image (c.embedding i)) this,
have : (finset.bind finset.univ (λ (i : fin c.length), finset.univ.image (c.embedding i)))
= finset.univ,
{ ext j,
simp only [finset.mem_univ, finset.mem_bind, iff_true, exists_prop_of_true, finset.mem_image],
refine ⟨c.index j, by simpa using c.mem_range_embedding j⟩ },
rw this at Z,
rw Z,
congr,
ext i,
rw finset.prod_image,
assume a ha b hb hab,
exact c.embedding_inj i hab },
-- Now that the main point is proved, write down the estimates using the definition of the norm
-- of a multilinear map
calc ∥q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p c v∥
= ∥q c.length (p.apply_composition c v)∥ : rfl
... ≤ ∥q c.length∥ * finset.univ.prod (λ i, ∥p.apply_composition c v i∥) :
continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm _ _
... ≤ ∥q c.length∥ * finset.univ.prod (λ i, ∥p (c.blocks_fun i)∥ *
(finset.univ : finset (fin (c.blocks_fun i))).prod (λ j, ∥(v ∘ (c.embedding i)) j∥)) :
begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _),
refine finset.prod_le_prod (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _) (λ i hi, _),
apply continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm,
end
... = ∥q c.length∥ * finset.univ.prod (λ i, ∥p (c.blocks_fun i)∥) * finset.univ.prod (λ i,
(finset.univ : finset (fin (c.blocks_fun i))).prod (λ j, ∥(v ∘ (c.embedding i)) j∥)) :
by rw [finset.prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
... = ∥q c.length∥ * finset.univ.prod (λ i, ∥p (c.blocks_fun i)∥)
* (finset.univ : finset (fin n)).prod (λ i, ∥v i∥) : by rw A
end
/-- Given two formal multilinear series `q` and `p` and a composition `c` of `n`, one may
form a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables by applying the right coefficient of `p` to each
block of the composition, and then applying `q c.length` to the resulting vector. It is
called `q.comp_along_composition p c`. It is constructed from the analogous multilinear
function `q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p c`, together with a norm control to get
the continuity. -/
def comp_along_composition {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, E) G :=
(q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p c).mk_continuous _
(q.comp_along_composition_multilinear_bound p c)
/-- The norm of `q.comp_along_composition p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `q` and `p`. -/
lemma comp_along_composition_norm {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) :
∥q.comp_along_composition p c∥ ≤
∥q c.length∥ * finset.univ.prod (λ i, ∥p (c.blocks_fun i)∥) :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _))) _
lemma comp_along_composition_nnnorm {n : ℕ}
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(c : composition n) :
nnnorm (q.comp_along_composition p c) ≤
nnnorm (q c.length) * finset.univ.prod (λ i, nnnorm (p (c.blocks_fun i))) :=
begin
simp only [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm, nnreal.coe_mul, coe_nnnorm, nnreal.coe_prod, coe_nnnorm],
exact q.comp_along_composition_norm p c
end
/-- Formal composition of two formal multilinear series. The `n`-th coefficient in the composition
is defined to be the sum of `q.comp_along_composition p c` over all compositions of
`n`. In other words, this term (as a multilinear function applied to `v_0, ..., v_{n-1}`) is
`∑'_{k} ∑'_{i₁ + ... + iₖ = n} pₖ (q_{i_1} (...), ..., q_{i_k} (...))`, where one puts all variables
`v_0, ..., v_{n-1}` in increasing order in the dots.-/
protected def comp (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) :
formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E G :=
λ n, (finset.univ : finset (composition n)).sum (λ c, q.comp_along_composition p c)
/-- If two formal multilinear series have positive radius of convergence, then the terms appearing
in the definition of their composition are also summable (when multiplied by a suitable positive
geometric term). -/
theorem comp_summable_nnreal
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F)
(hq : 0 < q.radius) (hp : 0 < p.radius) :
∃ (r : nnreal), 0 < r ∧ summable (λ i, nnnorm (q.comp_along_composition p i.2) * r ^ i.1 :
(Σ n, composition n) → nnreal) :=
begin
/- This follows from the fact that the growth rate of `∥qₙ∥` and `∥pₙ∥` is at most geometric,
giving a geometric bound on each `∥q.comp_along_composition p op∥`, together with the
fact that there are `2^(n-1)` compositions of `n`, giving at most a geometric loss. -/
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hq with ⟨rq, rq_pos, hrq⟩,
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hp with ⟨rp, rp_pos, hrp⟩,
obtain ⟨Cq, hCq⟩ : ∃ (Cq : nnreal), ∀ n, nnnorm (q n) * rq^n ≤ Cq := q.bound_of_lt_radius hrq,
obtain ⟨Cp, hCp⟩ : ∃ (Cp : nnreal), ∀ n, nnnorm (p n) * rp^n ≤ Cp := p.bound_of_lt_radius hrp,
let r0 : nnreal := (4 * max Cp 1)⁻¹,
set r := min rp 1 * min rq 1 * r0,
have r_pos : 0 < r,
{ apply mul_pos' (mul_pos' _ _),
{ rw [nnreal.inv_pos],
apply mul_pos',
{ norm_num },
{ exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _) } },
{ rw ennreal.coe_pos at rp_pos, simp [rp_pos, zero_lt_one] },
{ rw ennreal.coe_pos at rq_pos, simp [rq_pos, zero_lt_one] } },
let a : ennreal := ((4 : nnreal) ⁻¹ : nnreal),
have two_a : 2 * a < 1,
{ change ((2 : nnreal) : ennreal) * ((4 : nnreal) ⁻¹ : nnreal) < (1 : nnreal),
rw [← ennreal.coe_mul, ennreal.coe_lt_coe, ← nnreal.coe_lt_coe, nnreal.coe_mul],
change (2 : ℝ) * (4 : ℝ)⁻¹ < 1,
norm_num },
have I : ∀ (i : Σ (n : ℕ), composition n),
↑(nnnorm (q.comp_along_composition p i.2) * r ^ i.1) ≤ (Cq : ennreal) * a ^ i.1,
{ rintros ⟨n, c⟩,
rw [← ennreal.coe_pow, ← ennreal.coe_mul, ennreal.coe_le_coe],
calc nnnorm (q.comp_along_composition p c) * r ^ n
≤ (nnnorm (q c.length) *
(finset.univ : finset (fin (c.length))).prod (λ i, nnnorm (p (c.blocks_fun i)))) * r ^ n :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (q.comp_along_composition_nnnorm p c) (bot_le)
... = (nnnorm (q c.length) * (min rq 1)^n) *
((finset.univ : finset (fin (c.length))).prod (λ i, nnnorm (p (c.blocks_fun i))) * (min rp 1) ^ n)
* r0 ^ n : by { dsimp [r], ring_exp }
... ≤ (nnnorm (q c.length) * (min rq 1) ^ c.length) *
((finset.univ : finset (fin c.length)).prod
(λ i, nnnorm (p (c.blocks_fun i)) * (min rp 1) ^ (c.blocks_fun i))) * r0 ^ n :
begin
apply_rules [mul_le_mul, bot_le, le_refl, pow_le_pow_of_le_one, min_le_right, c.length_le],
apply le_of_eq,
rw finset.prod_mul_distrib,
congr' 1,
conv_lhs { rw [← c.sum_blocks_fun, ← finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum] },
end
... ≤ Cq * ((finset.univ : finset (fin c.length)).prod (λ i, Cp)) * r0 ^ n :
begin
apply_rules [mul_le_mul, bot_le, le_trans _ (hCq c.length), le_refl, finset.prod_le_prod'],
{ assume i hi,
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul (le_refl _) _ bot_le bot_le) (hCp (c.blocks_fun i)),
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_left bot_le (min_le_left _ _) _ },
{ refine mul_le_mul (le_refl _) _ bot_le bot_le,
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_left bot_le (min_le_left _ _) _ }
end
... ≤ Cq * (max Cp 1) ^ n * r0 ^ n :
begin
apply_rules [mul_le_mul, bot_le, le_refl],
simp only [finset.card_fin, finset.prod_const],
refine le_trans (pow_le_pow_of_le_left bot_le (le_max_left Cp 1) c.length) _,
apply pow_le_pow (le_max_right Cp 1) c.length_le,
end
... = Cq * 4⁻¹ ^ n :
begin
dsimp [r0],
have A : (4 : nnreal) ≠ 0, by norm_num,
have B : max Cp 1 ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right Cp 1)),
field_simp [A, B],
ring_exp
end },
refine ⟨r, r_pos, _⟩,
rw [← ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable],
apply ne_of_lt,
calc (∑' (i : Σ (n : ℕ), composition n), ↑(nnnorm (q.comp_along_composition p i.2) * r ^ i.1))
≤ (∑' (i : Σ (n : ℕ), composition n), (Cq : ennreal) * a ^ i.1) : ennreal.tsum_le_tsum I
... = (∑' (n : ℕ), (∑' (c : composition n), (Cq : ennreal) * a ^ n)) : ennreal.tsum_sigma' _
... = (∑' (n : ℕ), ↑(fintype.card (composition n)) * (Cq : ennreal) * a ^ n) :
begin
congr' 1,
ext1 n,
rw [tsum_fintype, finset.sum_const, add_monoid.smul_eq_mul, finset.card_univ, mul_assoc]
end
... ≤ (∑' (n : ℕ), (2 : ennreal) ^ n * (Cq : ennreal) * a ^ n) :
begin
apply ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, _),
apply ennreal.mul_le_mul (ennreal.mul_le_mul _ (le_refl _)) (le_refl _),
rw composition_card,
simp only [nat.cast_bit0, nat.cast_one, nat.cast_pow],
apply ennreal.pow_le_pow _ (nat.sub_le n 1),
have : (1 : nnreal) ≤ (2 : nnreal), by norm_num,
rw ← ennreal.coe_le_coe at this,
exact this
end
... = (∑' (n : ℕ), (Cq : ennreal) * (2 * a) ^ n) : by { congr' 1, ext1 n, rw mul_pow, ring }
... = (Cq : ennreal) * (1 - 2 * a) ⁻¹ : by rw [ennreal.tsum_mul_left, ennreal.tsum_geometric]
... < ⊤ : by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, ennreal.mul_eq_top, two_a]
end
/-- Bounding below the radius of the composition of two formal multilinear series assuming
summability over all compositions. -/
theorem le_comp_radius_of_summable
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (r : nnreal)
(hr : summable (λ i, nnnorm (q.comp_along_composition p i.2) * r ^ i.1 :
(Σ n, composition n) → nnreal)) :
(r : ennreal) ≤ (q.comp p).radius :=
begin
apply le_radius_of_bound _ (tsum (λ (i : Σ (n : ℕ), composition n),
(nnnorm (comp_along_composition q p i.snd) * r ^ i.fst))),
assume n,
calc nnnorm (formal_multilinear_series.comp q p n) * r ^ n ≤
∑' (c : composition n), nnnorm (comp_along_composition q p c) * r ^ n :
begin
rw [tsum_fintype, ← finset.sum_mul],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (nnnorm_sum_le _ _) bot_le
end
... ≤ ∑' (i : Σ (n : ℕ), composition n),
nnnorm (comp_along_composition q p i.snd) * r ^ i.fst :
begin
let f : composition n → (Σ (n : ℕ), composition n) := λ c, ⟨n, c⟩,
have : function.injective f, by tidy,
convert nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hr this
end
end
/-! Now, we will prove that the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p` up to order `N` is
given by a sum over some large subset of `Σ n, composition n` of `q.comp_along_composition p`, to
deduce that the series for `q.comp p` indeed converges to `g ∘ f` when `q` is a power series for
`g` and `p` is a power series for `f`.
This proof is a big reindexing argument of a sum. Since it is a bit involved, we define first
the source of the change of variables (`comp_partial_source`), its target
(`comp_partial_target`) and the change of variables itself (`comp_change_of_variables`) before
giving the main statement in `comp_partial_sum`. -/
/-- Source set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series -/
def comp_partial_sum_source (N : ℕ) : finset (Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ) :=
finset.sigma (finset.range N) (λ (n : ℕ), fintype.pi_finset (λ (i : fin n), finset.Ico 1 N) : _)
@[simp] lemma mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff (N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ) :
i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source N ↔ i.1 < N ∧ ∀ (a : fin i.1), 1 ≤ i.2 a ∧ i.2 a < N :=
by simp [comp_partial_sum_source]
/-- Change of variables appearing to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series -/
def comp_change_of_variables (N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ) (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source N) :
(Σn, composition n) :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩,
rw mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff at hi,
exact ⟨finset.univ.sum f, list.of_fn (λ a, ⟨f a, (hi.2 a).1⟩), by simp [list.sum_of_fn]⟩
end
@[simp] lemma comp_change_of_variables_length
(N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ} (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source N) :
composition.length (comp_change_of_variables N i hi).2 = i.1 :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩,
dsimp [comp_change_of_variables],
simp only [composition.length, composition.blocks, list.map_of_fn, list.length_of_fn]
end
lemma comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun
(N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ} (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source N) (j : fin i.1) :
(comp_change_of_variables N i hi).2.blocks_fun
⟨j.val, (comp_change_of_variables_length N hi).symm ▸ j.2⟩ = i.2 j :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩,
dsimp [composition.blocks_fun, composition.blocks, comp_change_of_variables],
simp only [list.map_of_fn, pnat.mk_coe, list.nth_le_of_fn', function.comp_app],
apply congr_arg,
rw fin.ext_iff
end
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a set. -/
def comp_partial_sum_target_set (N : ℕ) : set (Σ n, composition n) :=
{i | (i.2.length < N) ∧ (∀ (j : fin i.2.length), i.2.blocks_fun j < N)}
lemma comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source
(N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, composition n) (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_target_set N) :
∃ j (hj : j ∈ comp_partial_sum_source N), i = comp_change_of_variables N j hj :=
begin
rcases i with ⟨n, c⟩,
simp [comp_partial_sum_target_set] at hi,
refine ⟨⟨c.length, c.blocks_fun⟩, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff, hi.left, hi.right, true_and, and_true],
exact λ a, c.one_le_blocks' _ },
{ dsimp [comp_change_of_variables],
rw composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq,
simp only [composition.blocks_fun, composition.blocks, subtype.coe_eta, list.nth_le_map'],
conv_lhs { rw ← list.of_fn_nth_le c.blocks_pnat },
congr' 2,
{ exact c.blocks_pnat_length },
{ exact (fin.heq_fun_iff c.blocks_pnat_length).2 (λ i, rfl) } }
end
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a finset. -/
def comp_partial_sum_target (N : ℕ) : finset (Σ n, composition n) :=
set.finite.to_finset $ set.finite_dependent_image (finset.finite_to_set _)
(comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source N)
@[simp] lemma mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff {N : ℕ} {a : Σ n, composition n} :
a ∈ comp_partial_sum_target N ↔ a.2.length < N ∧ (∀ (j : fin a.2.length), a.2.blocks_fun j < N) :=
by simp [comp_partial_sum_target, comp_partial_sum_target_set]
/-- The auxiliary set corresponding to the composition of partial sums asymptotically contains
all possible compositions. -/
lemma comp_partial_sum_target_tendsto_at_top :
tendsto comp_partial_sum_target at_top at_top :=
begin
apply monotone.tendsto_at_top_finset,
{ assume m n hmn a ha,
have : ∀ i, i < m → i < n := λ i hi, lt_of_lt_of_le hi hmn,
tidy },
{ rintros ⟨n, c⟩,
simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff],
have : bdd_above ↑(finset.univ.image (λ (i : fin c.length), c.blocks_fun i)) :=
finset.bdd_above _,
rcases this with ⟨n, hn⟩,
refine ⟨max n c.length + 1, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right n c.length) (lt_add_one _),
λ j, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)) (lt_add_one _)⟩,
apply hn,
simp only [finset.mem_image_of_mem, finset.mem_coe, finset.mem_univ] }
end
/-- Composing the partial sums of two multilinear series coincides with the sum over all
compositions in `comp_partial_sum_target N`. This is precisely the motivation for the definition of
`comp_partial_sum_target N`. -/
lemma comp_partial_sum
(q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (N : ℕ) (z : E) :
q.partial_sum N ((finset.Ico 1 N).sum (λ a, p a (λ b, z)))
= (comp_partial_sum_target N).sum (λ i, q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p i.2 (λ j, z)) :=
begin
-- we expand the composition, using the multilinearity of `q` to expand along each coordinate.
suffices H : (finset.range N).sum
(λ (n : ℕ), (fintype.pi_finset (λ (i : fin n), finset.Ico 1 N)).sum
(λ (r : fin n → ℕ), q n (λ (i : fin n), p (r i) (λ (i : fin (r i)), z)))) =
(comp_partial_sum_target N).sum (λ i, q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p i.2 (λ j, z)),
by simpa only [formal_multilinear_series.partial_sum,
continuous_multilinear_map.map_sum_finset] using H,
-- rewrite the first sum as a big sum over a sigma type
rw ← @finset.sum_sigma _ _ _ _
(finset.range N) (λ (n : ℕ), (fintype.pi_finset (λ (i : fin n), finset.Ico 1 N)) : _)
(λ i, q i.1 (λ (j : fin i.1), p (i.2 j) (λ (k : fin (i.2 j)), z))),
-- show that the two sums correspond to each other by reindexing the variables. This is the
-- content of `finset.sum_bij`, for which we spell out all parameters of the bijection
-- explicitly as the setting is complicated.
apply @finset.sum_bij _ _ _ _ (comp_partial_sum_source N) (comp_partial_sum_target N)
(λ i, q i.1 (λ (j : fin i.1), p (i.2 j) (λ (k : fin (i.2 j)), z)))
(λ i, q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p i.2 (λ j, z))
(comp_change_of_variables N),
-- To conclude, we should show that the correspondance we have set up is indeed a bijection
-- between the index sets of the two sums.
-- 1 - show that the image belongs to `comp_partial_sum_target N`
{ rintros ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H,
rw mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff at H,
simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff, composition.length, composition.blocks, H.left,
list.map_of_fn, list.length_of_fn, true_and, comp_change_of_variables],
assume j,
simp only [composition.blocks_fun, composition.blocks, (H.right _).right, pnat.mk_coe,
list.map_of_fn, list.nth_le_of_fn', function.comp_app] },
-- 2 - show that the composition gives the `comp_along_composition` application
{ rintros ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H,
have L := comp_change_of_variables_length N H,
have B := comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun N H,
rw mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff at H,
dsimp [formal_multilinear_series.comp_along_composition_multilinear,
formal_multilinear_series.apply_composition, comp_change_of_variables] at L B ⊢,
unfold_coes,
congr' 1; try { rw L },
apply (fin.heq_fun_iff L.symm).2 (λ j, _),
rw ← B },
-- 3 - show that the map is injective
{ assume i i' H H' heq,
have B := comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun N H,
have B' := comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun N H',
have A : i.1 = i'.1,
{ rw [← comp_change_of_variables_length N H, ← comp_change_of_variables_length _ H', heq] },
rcases i with ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩,
rcases i' with ⟨k', blocks_fun'⟩,
dsimp at A B B',
simp only [A, fin.heq_fun_iff, true_and, eq_self_iff_true],
assume i,
rw [← B, ← B'],
congr' 1; try { rw heq },
rw fin.heq_ext_iff,
rw heq },
-- 4 - show that the map is surjective
{ assume i hi,
apply comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source N i,
simpa [comp_partial_sum_target] using hi }
end
end formal_multilinear_series
open formal_multilinear_series
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` have power series `q` and `p` respectively at `f x` and `x`, then
`g ∘ f` admits the power series `q.comp p` at `x`. -/
theorem has_fpower_series_at.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
{q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G} {p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F} {x : E}
(hg : has_fpower_series_at g q (f x)) (hf : has_fpower_series_at f p x) :
has_fpower_series_at (g ∘ f) (q.comp p) x :=
begin
/- Consider `rf` and `rg` such that `f` and `g` have power series expansion on the disks
of radius `rf` and `rg`. -/
rcases hg with ⟨rg, Hg⟩,
rcases hf with ⟨rf, Hf⟩,
/- The terms defining `q.comp p` are geometrically summable in a disk of some radius `r`. -/
rcases q.comp_summable_nnreal p Hg.radius_pos Hf.radius_pos with ⟨r, r_pos, hr⟩,
/- We will consider `y` which is smaller than `r` and `rf`, and also small enough that
`f (x + y)` is close enough to `f x` to be in the disk where `g` is well behaved. Let
`min (r, rf, δ)` be this new radius.-/
have : continuous_at f x := Hf.analytic_at.continuous_at,
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ : ∃ (δ : ennreal) (H : 0 < δ),
∀ {z : E}, z ∈ emetric.ball x δ → f z ∈ emetric.ball (f x) rg,
{ have : emetric.ball (f x) rg ∈ 𝓝 (f x) := emetric.ball_mem_nhds _ Hg.r_pos,
rcases emetric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (Hf.analytic_at.continuous_at this) with ⟨δ, δpos, Hδ⟩,
exact ⟨δ, δpos, λ z hz, Hδ hz⟩ },
let rf' := min rf δ,
have rf'_pos : 0 < rf', by simp [rf', Hf.r_pos, δpos],
have min_pos : 0 < min rf' r, by simp [r_pos, rf'_pos],
/- We will show that `g ∘ f` admits the power series `q.comp p` in the disk of
radius `min (r, rf', δ)`. -/
refine ⟨min rf' r, _⟩,
refine ⟨le_trans (min_le_right rf' r)
(formal_multilinear_series.le_comp_radius_of_summable q p r hr), min_pos, λ y hy, _⟩,
/- Let `y` satisfy `∥y∥ < min (r, rf', δ)`. We want to show that `g (f (x + y))` is the sum of
`q.comp p` applied to `y`. -/
-- First, check that `y` is small enough so that estimates for `f` and `g` apply.
have y_mem : y ∈ emetric.ball (0 : E) rf :=
(emetric.ball_subset_ball (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _))) hy,
have fy_mem : f (x + y) ∈ emetric.ball (f x) rg,
{ apply hδ,
have : y ∈ emetric.ball (0 : E) δ :=
(emetric.ball_subset_ball (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _))) hy,
simpa [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] },
/- Now starts the proof. To show that the sum of `q.comp p` at `y` is `g (f (x + y))`, we will
write `q.comp p` applied to `y` as a big sum over all compositions. Since the sum is
summable, to get its convergence it suffices to get the convergence along some increasing sequence
of sets. We will use the sequence of sets `comp_partial_sum_target n`, along which the sum is
exactly the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p`, by design. To show that it converges
to `g (f (x + y))`, pointwise convergence would not be enough, but we have uniform convergence
to save the day. -/
-- First step: the partial sum of `p` converges to `f (x + y)`.
have A : tendsto (λ n, (finset.Ico 1 n).sum (λ a, p a (λ b, y))) at_top (𝓝 (f (x + y) - f x)),
{ have L : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, (finset.range n).sum (λ a, p a (λ b, y)) - f x =
(finset.Ico 1 n).sum (λ a, p a (λ b, y)),
{ rw eventually_at_top,
refine ⟨1, λ n hn, _⟩,
symmetry,
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq', finset.range_eq_Ico, ← Hf.coeff_zero (λi, y),
finset.sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot hn] },
have : tendsto (λ n, (finset.range n).sum (λ a, p a (λ b, y)) - f x) at_top
(𝓝 (f (x + y) - f x)) :=
(Hf.has_sum y_mem).tendsto_sum_nat.sub tendsto_const_nhds,
exact tendsto.congr' L this },
-- Second step: the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p` converges to `g (f (x + y))`.
have B : tendsto (λ n, q.partial_sum n ((finset.Ico 1 n).sum (λ a, p a (λ b, y))))
at_top (𝓝 (g (f (x + y)))),
{ -- we use the fact that the partial sums of `q` converge locally uniformly to `g`, and that
-- composition passes to the limit under locally uniform convergence.
have B₁ : continuous_at (λ (z : F), g (f x + z)) (f (x + y) - f x),
{ refine continuous_at.comp _ (continuous_const.add continuous_id).continuous_at,
simp only [add_sub_cancel'_right, id.def],
exact Hg.continuous_on.continuous_at (mem_nhds_sets (emetric.is_open_ball) fy_mem) },
have B₂ : f (x + y) - f x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : F) rg,
by simpa [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub] using fy_mem,
rw [← nhds_within_eq_of_open B₂ emetric.is_open_ball] at A,
convert Hg.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on.tendsto_comp B₁.continuous_within_at B₂ A,
simp only [add_sub_cancel'_right] },
-- Third step: the sum over all compositions in `comp_partial_sum_target n` converges to
-- `g (f (x + y))`. As this sum is exactly the composition of the partial sum, this is a direct
-- consequence of the second step
have C : tendsto (λ n,
(comp_partial_sum_target n).sum (λ i, q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p i.2 (λ j, y)))
at_top (𝓝 (g (f (x + y)))), by simpa [comp_partial_sum] using B,
-- Fourth step: the sum over all compositions is `g (f (x + y))`. This follows from the
-- convergence along a subsequence proved in the third step, and the fact that the sum is Cauchy
-- thanks to the summability properties.
have D : has_sum (λ i : (Σ n, composition n),
q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p i.2 (λ j, y)) (g (f (x + y))),
{ have cau : cauchy_seq (λ (s : finset (Σ n, composition n)),
s.sum (λ i, q.comp_along_composition_multilinear p i.2 (λ j, y))),
{ apply cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hr) _,
simp only [coe_nnnorm, nnreal.coe_mul, nnreal.coe_pow],
rintros ⟨n, c⟩,
calc ∥(comp_along_composition q p c) (λ (j : fin n), y)∥
≤ ∥comp_along_composition q p c∥ * finset.univ.prod (λ (j : fin n), ∥y∥) :
by apply continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm
... ≤ ∥comp_along_composition q p c∥ * (r : ℝ) ^ n :
begin
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _),
simp only [finset.card_fin, finset.prod_const],
apply pow_le_pow_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _),
rw [emetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] at hy,
have := (le_trans (le_of_lt hy) (min_le_right _ _)),
rwa [ennreal.coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm] at this
end },
exact tendsto_nhds_of_cauchy_seq_of_subseq cau at_top_ne_bot
comp_partial_sum_target_tendsto_at_top C },
-- Fifth step: the sum over `n` of `q.comp p n` can be expressed as a particular resummation of
-- the sum over all compositions, by grouping together the compositions of the same
-- integer `n`. The convergence of the whole sum therefore implies the converence of the sum
-- of `q.comp p n`
have E : has_sum (λ n, (q.comp p) n (λ j, y)) (g (f (x + y))),
{ apply D.sigma,
assume n,
dsimp [formal_multilinear_series.comp],
convert has_sum_fintype _,
simp only [continuous_multilinear_map.sum_apply],
refl },
exact E
end
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` are analytic respectively at `f x` and `x`, then `g ∘ f` is
analytic at `x`. -/
theorem analytic_at.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E}
(hg : analytic_at 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : analytic_at 𝕜 f x) : analytic_at 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x :=
let ⟨q, hq⟩ := hg, ⟨p, hp⟩ := hf in (hq.comp hp).analytic_at
|
300894a82d9de902286b2441e01d2cbd3379efcd | 36938939954e91f23dec66a02728db08a7acfcf9 | /lean4/deps/galois_stdlib/src/Galois/Data/ParserComb.lean | 3813e0136596ad0da24888d7e4a7ac0e3af169eb | [] | no_license | pnwamk/reopt-vcg | f8b56dd0279392a5e1c6aee721be8138e6b558d3 | c9f9f185fbefc25c36c4b506bbc85fd1a03c3b6d | refs/heads/master | 1,631,145,017,772 | 1,593,549,019,000 | 1,593,549,143,000 | 254,191,418 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,586,377,077,000 | 1,586,377,077,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,049 | lean | -- Parsing combinators
import Init.System.IO
import Init.Control.State
import Init.Control.Id
import Init.Control.Option
-- Single-valued, backtracking on failure
structure Parser (tok : Type) (a : Type) :=
( run : StateT (List tok) (OptionT Id) a )
namespace Parser
variables {tok a b : Type}
instance : HasOrelse (Parser tok a) :=
{ orelse := fun x y => Parser.mk (x.run <|> y.run) }
instance : Monad (Parser tok) :=
{ bind := fun _ _ x f => Parser.mk (x.run >>= fun v => (f v).run)
, pure := fun _ x => Parser.mk (pure x)
}
instance : MonadState (List tok) (Parser tok) :=
{ set := fun s => Parser.mk (set s)
, get := Parser.mk get
, modifyGet := fun _ f => Parser.mk (modifyGet f)
}
instance : MonadExcept Unit (Parser tok) :=
{ throw := fun _ e => Parser.mk (throw e)
, catch := fun _ m f => Parser.mk (catch (m.run) (fun x => (f x).run))
}
protected
partial def many0 (p : Parser tok a) : Unit -> Parser tok (List a)
| _ => (do v <- p; vs <- many0 (); pure (v :: vs)) <|> pure []
def optional {a : Type} (f : tok -> Option a) : Parser tok a :=
do tks <- get;
match tks with
| [] => throw ()
| (t :: tks') =>
match f t with
| none => throw ()
| some r => (do set tks'; pure r)
def token (f : tok -> Bool) : Parser tok tok :=
optional (fun t => if f t then some t else none)
def exact [DecidableEq tok] (t : tok) : Parser tok tok :=
token (fun x => x = t)
def many (p : Parser tok a) : Parser tok (List a) := Parser.many0 p ()
def many1 (p : Parser tok a) : Parser tok (List a) :=
do v <- p;
vs <- many p;
pure (v :: vs)
def sepBy (s : Parser tok b) (p : Parser tok a) : Parser tok (List a) :=
(do rs <- many (do x <- p; discard s; pure x); -- p <* s
-- rs <- pure [];
r <- p;
pure (List.append rs [r])) <|> pure []
def first (ps : List (Parser tok a)) : Parser tok a :=
List.foldl (fun p m => p <|> m) (throw ()) ps
def runParser (p : Parser tok a) (tks : List tok) : Option a :=
(p.run.run' tks).run.run
end Parser
@[reducible]
def CharParser := Parser Char
namespace CharParser
open Parser
def digitP : CharParser Nat :=
optional (fun c => if c.isDigit then some (c.toNat - '0'.toNat) else none)
def natP : CharParser Nat :=
do ds <- many1 digitP;
pure (ds.foldl (fun acc d => acc * 10 + d) 0)
def intP : CharParser Int :=
(do discard $ exact '-';
n <- natP;
pure (Int.negOfNat n)) <|>
(Int.ofNat <$> natP)
def stringP (f : Char -> Bool) : CharParser String := List.asString <$> many (token f)
def string1P (f : Char -> Bool) : CharParser String := List.asString <$> many1 (token f)
def nonWSP : CharParser String :=
string1P (fun c => not (Char.isWhitespace c))
def whitespaceP : CharParser Unit :=
do _ <-token Char.isWhitespace;
pure ()
def parseFile {a : Type} {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadIO m] (p : CharParser a) (fname : String)
: m (Option a) :=
do s <- IO.FS.readFile fname;
pure (runParser p s.toList)
end CharParser
|
028062009a957908e12af17cffb68fca83e1dc9c | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Elab/Quotation.lean | 426a1c549a88e7d15bd744e71dcb1f699fd301b0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,822 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
Elaboration of syntax quotations as terms and patterns (in `match_syntax`). See also `./Hygiene.lean` for the basic
hygiene workings and data types.
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Syntax
import Init.Lean.Elab.ResolveName
import Init.Lean.Elab.Term
import Init.Lean.Parser -- TODO: remove after removing old elaborator
/- TODO
Quotations are currently integrated hackily into the old frontend. This implies the following restrictions:
* quotations have to fit in a single line, because that's how the old scanner works :)
* `open` commands are not respected (but `export`, `namespace` are)
* antiquotation terms have to be trivial (locals, consts (w/ projections), and apps, basically)
After removing the old frontend, quotations in this and other files should be cleaned up.
-/
namespace Lean
namespace Elab
namespace Term
namespace Quotation
-- antiquotation node kinds are formed from the original node kind (if any) plus "antiquot"
def isAntiquot : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node (Name.str _ "antiquot" _) _ => true
| _ => false
-- Antiquotations can be escaped as in `$$x`, which is useful for nesting macros.
def isEscapedAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
!(stx.getArg 1).getArgs.isEmpty
def unescapeAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if isAntiquot stx then
stx.setArg 1 $ mkNullNode (stx.getArg 1).getArgs.pop
else stx
def getAntiquotTerm (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
let e := stx.getArg 2;
if e.isIdent then mkTermIdFromIdent e
else
-- `e` is from `"(" >> termParser >> ")"`
e.getArg 1
def antiquotKind? : Syntax → Option SyntaxNodeKind
| Syntax.node (Name.str k "antiquot" _) args =>
-- we treat all antiquotations where the kind was left implicit (`$e`) the same (see `elimAntiquotChoices`)
if (args.get! 3).isNone then some Name.anonymous
else some k
| _ => none
-- `$e*` is an antiquotation "splice" matching an arbitrary number of syntax nodes
def isAntiquotSplice (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
isAntiquot stx && (stx.getArg 5).getOptional?.isSome
-- If any item of a `many` node is an antiquotation splice, its result should
-- be substituted into the `many` node's children
def isAntiquotSplicePat (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
stx.isOfKind nullKind && stx.getArgs.any (fun arg => isAntiquotSplice arg && !isEscapedAntiquot arg)
/-- A term like `($e) is actually ambiguous: the antiquotation could be of kind `term`,
or `ident`, or ... . But it shouldn't really matter because antiquotations without
explicit kinds behave the same at runtime. So we replace `choice` nodes that contain
at least one implicit antiquotation with that antiquotation. -/
private partial def elimAntiquotChoices : Syntax → Syntax
| Syntax.node `choice args => match args.find? (fun arg => antiquotKind? arg == Name.anonymous) with
| some anti => anti
| none => Syntax.node `choice $ args.map elimAntiquotChoices
| Syntax.node k args => Syntax.node k $ args.map elimAntiquotChoices
| stx => stx
-- Elaborate the content of a syntax quotation term
private partial def quoteSyntax : Syntax → TermElabM Syntax
| Syntax.ident info rawVal val preresolved => do
-- Add global scopes at compilation time (now), add macro scope at runtime (in the quotation).
-- See the paper for details.
r ← resolveGlobalName val;
let preresolved := r ++ preresolved;
let val := quote val;
-- `scp` is bound in stxQuot.expand
`(Syntax.ident none $(quote rawVal) (addMacroScope mainModule $val scp) $(quote preresolved))
-- if antiquotation, insert contents as-is, else recurse
| stx@(Syntax.node k _) =>
if isAntiquot stx && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
-- splices must occur in a `many` node
if isAntiquotSplice stx then throwError stx "unexpected antiquotation splice"
else pure $ getAntiquotTerm stx
else do
empty ← `(Array.empty);
-- if escaped antiquotation, decrement by one escape level
let stx := unescapeAntiquot stx;
args ← stx.getArgs.foldlM (fun args arg =>
if k == nullKind && isAntiquotSplice arg then
-- antiquotation splice pattern: inject args array
`(Array.append $args $(getAntiquotTerm arg))
else do
arg ← quoteSyntax arg;
`(Array.push $args $arg)) empty;
`(Syntax.node $(quote k) $args)
| Syntax.atom info val =>
`(Syntax.atom none $(quote val))
| Syntax.missing => unreachable!
def stxQuot.expand (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax := do
let quoted := stx.getArg 1;
/- Syntax quotations are monadic values depending on the current macro scope. For efficiency, we bind
the macro scope once for each quotation, then build the syntax tree in a completely pure computation
depending on this binding. Note that regular function calls do not introduce a new macro scope (i.e.
we preserve referential transparency), so we can refer to this same `scp` inside `quoteSyntax` by
including it literally in a syntax quotation. -/
-- TODO: simplify to `(do scp ← getCurrMacroScope; pure $(quoteSyntax quoted))
stx ← quoteSyntax (elimAntiquotChoices quoted);
`(bind getCurrMacroScope (fun scp => bind getMainModule (fun mainModule => pure $stx)))
/- NOTE: It may seem like the newly introduced binding `scp` may accidentally
capture identifiers in an antiquotation introduced by `quoteSyntax`. However,
note that the syntax quotation above enjoys the same hygiene guarantees as
anywhere else in Lean; that is, we implement hygienic quotations by making
use of the hygienic quotation support of the bootstrapped Lean compiler!
Aside: While this might sound "dangerous", it is in fact less reliant on a
"chain of trust" than other bootstrapping parts of Lean: because this
implementation itself never uses `scp` (or any other identifier) both inside
and outside quotations, it can actually correctly be compiled by an
unhygienic (but otherwise correct) implementation of syntax quotations. As
long as it is then compiled again with the resulting executable (i.e. up to
stage 2), the result is a correct hygienic implementation. In this sense the
implementation is "self-stabilizing". It was in fact originally compiled
by an unhygienic prototype implementation. -/
@[builtinTermElab stxQuot] def elabStxQuot : TermElab :=
adaptExpander stxQuot.expand
/- match_syntax -/
-- an "alternative" of patterns plus right-hand side
private abbrev Alt := List Syntax × Syntax
/-- Information on a pattern's head that influences the compilation of a single
match step. -/
structure HeadInfo :=
-- Node kind to match, if any
(kind : Option SyntaxNodeKind := none)
-- Nested patterns for each argument, if any. In a single match step, we only
-- check that the arity matches. The arity is usually implied by the node kind,
-- but not in the case of `many` nodes.
(argPats : Option (Array Syntax) := none)
-- Function to apply to the right-hand side in case the match succeeds. Used to
-- bind pattern variables.
(rhsFn : Syntax → TermElabM Syntax := pure)
instance HeadInfo.Inhabited : Inhabited HeadInfo := ⟨{}⟩
/-- `h1.generalizes h2` iff h1 is equal to or more general than h2, i.e. it matches all nodes
h2 matches. This induces a partial ordering. -/
def HeadInfo.generalizes : HeadInfo → HeadInfo → Bool
| { kind := none, .. }, _ => true
| { kind := some k1, argPats := none, .. },
{ kind := some k2, .. } => k1 == k2
| { kind := some k1, argPats := some ps1, .. },
{ kind := some k2, argPats := some ps2, .. } => k1 == k2 && ps1.size == ps2.size
| _, _ => false
private def getHeadInfo (alt : Alt) : HeadInfo :=
let pat := alt.fst.head!;
let unconditional (rhsFn) := { HeadInfo . rhsFn := rhsFn };
-- variable pattern
if pat.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.id then unconditional $ fun rhs => `(let $pat := discr; $rhs)
-- wildcard pattern
else if pat.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.hole then unconditional pure
-- quotation pattern
else if pat.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.stxQuot then
let quoted := pat.getArg 1;
if quoted.isAtom then
-- We assume that atoms are uniquely determined by the node kind and never have to be checked
unconditional pure
else if isAntiquot quoted && !isEscapedAntiquot quoted then
-- quotation contains a single antiquotation
let k := antiquotKind? quoted;
-- Antiquotation kinds like `$id:id` influence the parser, but also need to be considered by
-- match_syntax (but not by quotation terms). For example, `($id:id) and `($e) are not
-- distinguishable without checking the kind of the node to be captured. Note that some
-- antiquotations like the latter one for terms do not correspond to any actual node kind
-- (signified by `k == Name.anonymous`), so we would only check for `Term.id` here.
--
-- if stx.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.id then
-- let id := stx; ...
-- else
-- let e := stx; ...
let kind := if k == Name.anonymous then none else k;
let anti := getAntiquotTerm quoted;
-- Splices should only appear inside a nullKind node, see next case
if isAntiquotSplice quoted then unconditional $ fun _ => throwError quoted "unexpected antiquotation splice"
else if anti.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.id then { kind := kind, rhsFn := fun rhs => `(let $anti := discr; $rhs) }
else unconditional $ fun _ => throwError anti ("match_syntax: antiquotation must be variable " ++ toString anti)
else if isAntiquotSplicePat quoted && quoted.getArgs.size == 1 then
-- quotation is a single antiquotation splice => bind args array
let anti := getAntiquotTerm (quoted.getArg 0);
unconditional $ fun rhs => `(let $anti := Syntax.getArgs discr; $rhs)
-- TODO: support for more complex antiquotation splices
else
-- not an antiquotation or escaped antiquotation: match head shape
let quoted := unescapeAntiquot quoted;
let argPats := quoted.getArgs.map $ fun arg => Syntax.node `Lean.Parser.Term.stxQuot #[mkAtom "`(", arg, mkAtom ")"];
{ kind := quoted.getKind, argPats := argPats }
else
unconditional $ fun _ => throwError pat ("match_syntax: unexpected pattern kind " ++ toString pat)
-- Assuming that the first pattern of the alternative is taken, replace it with patterns (if any) for its
-- child nodes.
-- Ex: `($a + (- $b)) => `($a), `(+), `(- $b)
-- Note: The atom pattern `(+) will be discarded in a later step
private def explodeHeadPat (numArgs : Nat) : HeadInfo × Alt → TermElabM Alt
| (info, (pat::pats, rhs)) => do
let newPats := match info.argPats with
| some argPats => argPats.toList
| none => List.replicate numArgs $ Unhygienic.run `(_);
rhs ← info.rhsFn rhs;
pure (newPats ++ pats, rhs)
| _ => unreachable!
private partial def compileStxMatch (ref : Syntax) : List Syntax → List Alt → TermElabM Syntax
| [], ([], rhs)::_ => pure rhs -- nothing left to match
| _, [] => throwError ref "non-exhaustive 'match_syntax'"
| discr::discrs, alts => do
let alts := (alts.map getHeadInfo).zip alts;
-- Choose a most specific pattern, ie. a minimal element according to `generalizes`.
-- If there are multiple minimal elements, the choice does not matter.
let (info, alt) := alts.tail!.foldl (fun (min : HeadInfo × Alt) (alt : HeadInfo × Alt) => if min.1.generalizes alt.1 then alt else min) alts.head!;
-- introduce pattern matches on the discriminant's children if there are any nested patterns
newDiscrs ← match info.argPats with
| some pats => (List.range pats.size).mapM $ fun i => `(Syntax.getArg discr $(quote i))
| none => pure [];
-- collect matching alternatives and explode them
let yesAlts := alts.filter $ fun (alt : HeadInfo × Alt) => alt.1.generalizes info;
yesAlts ← yesAlts.mapM $ explodeHeadPat newDiscrs.length;
-- NOTE: use fresh macro scopes for recursive call so that different `discr`s introduced by the quotations below do not collide
yes ← withFreshMacroScope $ compileStxMatch (newDiscrs ++ discrs) yesAlts;
some kind ← pure info.kind
-- unconditional match step
| `(let discr := $discr; $yes);
-- conditional match step
let noAlts := (alts.filter $ fun (alt : HeadInfo × Alt) => !info.generalizes alt.1).map Prod.snd;
no ← withFreshMacroScope $ compileStxMatch (discr::discrs) noAlts;
cond ← match info.argPats with
| some pats => `(Syntax.isOfKind discr $(quote kind) && Array.size (Syntax.getArgs discr) == $(quote pats.size))
| none => `(Syntax.isOfKind discr $(quote kind));
`(let discr := $discr; if $cond = true then $yes else $no)
| _, _ => unreachable!
private partial def getPatternVarsAux : Syntax → List Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node k args) =>
if isAntiquot stx && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
let anti := getAntiquotTerm stx;
if anti.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.id then [anti]
else []
else
List.join $ args.toList.map getPatternVarsAux
| _ => []
-- Get all pattern vars (as Term.id nodes) in `stx`
partial def getPatternVars (stx : Syntax) : List Syntax :=
if stx.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.stxQuot then do
let quoted := stx.getArg 1;
getPatternVarsAux stx
else if stx.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.id then
[stx]
else []
-- Transform alternatives by binding all right-hand sides to outside the match_syntax in order to prevent
-- code duplication during match_syntax compilation
private def letBindRhss (cont : List Alt → TermElabM Syntax) : List Alt → List Alt → TermElabM Syntax
| [], altsRev' => cont altsRev'.reverse
| (pats, rhs)::alts, altsRev' => do
let vars := List.join $ pats.map getPatternVars;
match vars with
-- no antiquotations => introduce Unit parameter to preserve evaluation order
| [] => do
-- NOTE: references binding below
rhs' ← `(rhs ());
-- NOTE: new macro scope so that introduced bindings do not collide
stx ← withFreshMacroScope $ letBindRhss alts ((pats, rhs')::altsRev');
`(let rhs := fun _ => $rhs; $stx)
| _ => do
-- rhs ← `(fun $vars* => $rhs)
let rhs := Syntax.node `Lean.Parser.Term.fun #[mkAtom "fun", Syntax.node `null vars.toArray, mkAtom "=>", rhs];
rhs' ← `(rhs);
stx ← withFreshMacroScope $ letBindRhss alts ((pats, rhs')::altsRev');
`(let rhs := $rhs; $stx)
def match_syntax.expand (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax := do
let discr := stx.getArg 1;
let alts := stx.getArg 4;
alts ← alts.getArgs.getSepElems.mapM $ fun alt => do {
let pats := alt.getArg 0;
pat ← if pats.getArgs.size == 1 then pure $ pats.getArg 0
else throwError stx "match_syntax: expected exactly one pattern per alternative";
let pat := if pat.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.stxQuot then pat.setArg 1 $ elimAntiquotChoices $ pat.getArg 1 else pat;
match pat.find? $ fun stx => stx.getKind == choiceKind with
| some choiceStx => throwError choiceStx "invalid pattern, nested syntax has multiple interpretations"
| none =>
let rhs := alt.getArg 2;
pure ([pat], rhs)
};
-- letBindRhss (compileStxMatch stx [discr]) alts.toList []
compileStxMatch stx [discr] alts.toList
@[builtinTermElab «match_syntax»] def elabMatchSyntax : TermElab :=
adaptExpander match_syntax.expand
-- REMOVE with old frontend
private def exprPlaceholder := mkMVar Name.anonymous
private unsafe partial def toPreterm : Syntax → TermElabM Expr
| stx =>
let args := stx.getArgs;
match stx.getKind with
| `Lean.Parser.Term.id =>
match args.get! 0 with
| Syntax.ident _ _ val preresolved => do
resolved ← resolveName stx val preresolved [];
match resolved with
| (pre,projs)::_ =>
let pre := match pre with
| Expr.const c _ _ => Lean.mkConst c -- remove universes confusing the old frontend
| _ => pre;
pure $ projs.foldl (fun e proj => mkMData (MData.empty.setName `fieldNotation proj) e) pre
| [] => unreachable!
| _ => unreachable!
| `Lean.Parser.Term.fun => do
let params := (args.get! 1).getArgs;
let body := args.get! 3;
if params.size == 0 then toPreterm body
else do
let param := params.get! 0;
(n, ty) ← if param.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.id then
pure (param.getIdAt 0, exprPlaceholder)
else if param.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.hole then
pure (`_a, exprPlaceholder)
else do {
let n := ((param.getArg 1).getArg 0).getIdAt 0;
ty ← toPreterm $ (((param.getArg 1).getArg 1).getArg 0).getArg 1;
pure (n, ty)
};
lctx ← getLCtx;
let lctx := lctx.mkLocalDecl n n ty;
let params := params.eraseIdx 0;
stx ← `(fun $params* => $body);
adaptReader (fun (ctx : Context) => { lctx := lctx, .. ctx }) $ do
e ← toPreterm stx;
pure $ lctx.mkLambda #[mkFVar n] e
| `Lean.Parser.Term.let => do
let decl := args.get! 1;
let n := if (decl.getArg 0).isIdent then (decl.getArg 0).getId else (decl.getArg 0).getIdAt 0;
let val := decl.getArg 4;
let body := args.get! 3;
val ← toPreterm val;
lctx ← getLCtx;
let lctx := lctx.mkLetDecl n n exprPlaceholder val;
adaptReader (fun (ctx : Context) => { lctx := lctx, .. ctx }) $ do
e ← toPreterm $ body;
pure $ lctx.mkLambda #[mkFVar n] e
| `Lean.Parser.Term.app => do
fn ← toPreterm $ args.get! 0;
as ← (args.get! 1).getArgs.mapM toPreterm;
pure $ mkAppN fn as
| `Lean.Parser.Term.if => do
let con := args.get! 2;
let yes := args.get! 4;
let no := args.get! 6;
toPreterm $ Unhygienic.run `(ite $con $yes $no)
| `Lean.Parser.Term.paren =>
let inner := (args.get! 1).getArgs;
if inner.size == 0 then pure $ Lean.mkConst `Unit.unit
else toPreterm $ inner.get! 0
| `Lean.Parser.Term.band =>
let lhs := args.get! 0; let rhs := args.get! 2;
toPreterm $ Unhygienic.run `(and $lhs $rhs)
| `Lean.Parser.Term.beq =>
let lhs := args.get! 0; let rhs := args.get! 2;
toPreterm $ Unhygienic.run `(HasBeq.beq $lhs $rhs)
| `Lean.Parser.Term.eq =>
let lhs := args.get! 0; let rhs := args.get! 2;
toPreterm $ Unhygienic.run `(Eq $lhs $rhs)
| `Lean.Parser.Term.str => pure $ mkStrLit $ (stx.getArg 0).isStrLit?.getD ""
| `Lean.Parser.Term.num => pure $ mkNatLit $ (stx.getArg 0).isNatLit?.getD 0
| `expr => pure $ unsafeCast $ stx.getArg 0 -- HACK: see below
| k => throwError stx $ "stxQuot: unimplemented kind " ++ toString k
@[export lean_parse_expr]
def oldParseExpr (env : Environment) (input : String) (pos : String.Pos) : Except String (Syntax × String.Pos) := do
let c := Parser.mkParserContext env (Parser.mkInputContext input "<foo>");
let s := Parser.mkParserState c.input;
let s := s.setPos pos;
let s := (Parser.termParser Parser.appPrec : Parser.Parser).fn { rbp := Parser.appPrec, .. c } s;
let stx := s.stxStack.back;
match s.errorMsg with
| some errorMsg =>
Except.error $ toString errorMsg
| none =>
Except.ok (stx, s.pos)
structure OldContext :=
(env : Environment)
(locals : List Name)
(open_nss : List Name)
private def oldRunTermElabM {α} (ctx : OldContext) (x : TermElabM α) : Except String α := do
match x {fileName := "foo", fileMap := FileMap.ofString "", cmdPos := 0,
currNamespace := ctx.env.getNamespace, currRecDepth := 0, maxRecDepth := 10000,
openDecls := ctx.open_nss.map $ fun n => OpenDecl.simple n [],
lctx := ctx.locals.foldl (fun lctx l => LocalContext.mkLocalDecl lctx l l exprPlaceholder) $ LocalContext.mkEmpty ()}
{env := ctx.env} with
| EStateM.Result.ok a _ => Except.ok a
| EStateM.Result.error msg _ => Except.error $ toString msg
@[export lean_expand_stx_quot]
unsafe def oldExpandStxQuot (ctx : OldContext) (stx : Syntax) : Except String Expr := oldRunTermElabM ctx $ do
stx ← stxQuot.expand stx;
toPreterm stx
@[export lean_get_antiquot_vars]
def oldGetPatternVars (ctx : OldContext) (pats : List Syntax) : Except String (List Name) := oldRunTermElabM ctx $ do
let vars := List.join $ pats.map getPatternVars;
pure $ vars.map $ fun var => var.getIdAt 0
@[export lean_expand_match_syntax]
unsafe def oldExpandMatchSyntax (ctx : OldContext) (discr : Syntax) (alts : List (List Syntax × Syntax)) : Except String Expr := oldRunTermElabM ctx $ do
-- HACK: discr and the RHSs are actually `Expr`
let discr := Syntax.node `expr #[discr];
let alts := alts.map $ fun alt =>
let pats := alt.1.map elimAntiquotChoices;
(pats, Syntax.node `expr #[alt.2]);
-- letBindRhss (compileStxMatch Syntax.missing [discr]) alts []
stx ← compileStxMatch Syntax.missing [discr] alts;
toPreterm stx
end Quotation
end Term
end Elab
end Lean
|
5ea6fe218611c9eb1ffb61a47b70cf46693e77c4 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Lean/Meta/Match/CaseArraySizes.lean | f83391fa4838884524841f7a5119b1b51a921e4a | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,842 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Assert
import Lean.Meta.Match.CaseValues
namespace Lean.Meta
structure CaseArraySizesSubgoal where
mvarId : MVarId
elems : Array FVarId := #[]
diseqs : Array FVarId := #[]
subst : FVarSubst := {}
instance : Inhabited CaseArraySizesSubgoal :=
⟨{ mvarId := arbitrary }⟩
def getArrayArgType (a : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
let aType ← inferType a
let aType ← whnfD aType
unless aType.isAppOfArity `Array 1 do
throwError "array expected{indentExpr a}"
pure aType.appArg!
private def mkArrayGetLit (a : Expr) (i : Nat) (n : Nat) (h : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
let lt ← mkLt (mkRawNatLit i) (mkRawNatLit n)
let ltPrf ← mkDecideProof lt
mkAppM `Array.getLit #[a, mkRawNatLit i, h, ltPrf]
private partial def introArrayLit (mvarId : MVarId) (a : Expr) (n : Nat) (xNamePrefix : Name) (aSizeEqN : Expr) : MetaM MVarId := do
let α ← getArrayArgType a
let rec loop (i : Nat) (xs : Array Expr) (args : Array Expr) := do
if i < n then
withLocalDeclD (xNamePrefix.appendIndexAfter (i+1)) α fun xi => do
let xs := xs.push xi
let ai ← mkArrayGetLit a i n aSizeEqN
let args := args.push ai
loop (i+1) xs args
else
let xsLit ← mkArrayLit α xs.toList
let aEqXsLit ← mkEq a xsLit
let aEqLitPrf ← mkAppM ``Array.toArrayLit_eq #[a, mkRawNatLit n, aSizeEqN]
withLocalDeclD `hEqALit aEqXsLit fun heq => do
let target ← getMVarType mvarId
let newTarget ← mkForallFVars (xs.push heq) target
pure (newTarget, args.push aEqLitPrf)
let (newTarget, args) ← loop 0 #[] #[]
let tag ← getMVarTag mvarId
let newMVar ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar newTarget tag
assignExprMVar mvarId (mkAppN newMVar args)
pure newMVar.mvarId!
/--
Split goal `... |- C a` into sizes.size + 1 subgoals
1) `..., x_1 ... x_{sizes[0]} |- C #[x_1, ... x_{sizes[0]}]`
...
n) `..., x_1 ... x_{sizes[n-1]} |- C #[x_1, ..., x_{sizes[n-1]}]`
n+1) `..., (h_1 : a.size != sizes[0]), ..., (h_n : a.size != sizes[n-1]) |- C a`
where `n = sizes.size` -/
def caseArraySizes (mvarId : MVarId) (fvarId : FVarId) (sizes : Array Nat) (xNamePrefix := `x) (hNamePrefix := `h) : MetaM (Array CaseArraySizesSubgoal) :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
let a := mkFVar fvarId
let α ← getArrayArgType a
let aSize ← mkAppM `Array.size #[a]
let mvarId ← assertExt mvarId `aSize (mkConst `Nat) aSize
let (aSizeFVarId, mvarId) ← intro1 mvarId
let (hEq, mvarId) ← intro1 mvarId
let subgoals ← caseValues mvarId aSizeFVarId (sizes.map mkRawNatLit) hNamePrefix
subgoals.mapIdxM fun i subgoal => do
let subst := subgoal.subst
let mvarId := subgoal.mvarId
let hEqSz := (subst.get hEq).fvarId!
if h : i.val < sizes.size then
let n := sizes.get ⟨i, h⟩
let mvarId ← clear mvarId subgoal.newHs[0]
let mvarId ← clear mvarId (subst.get aSizeFVarId).fvarId!
withMVarContext mvarId do
let hEqSzSymm ← mkEqSymm (mkFVar hEqSz)
let mvarId ← introArrayLit mvarId a n xNamePrefix hEqSzSymm
let (xs, mvarId) ← introN mvarId n
let (hEqLit, mvarId) ← intro1 mvarId
let mvarId ← clear mvarId hEqSz
let (subst, mvarId) ← substCore mvarId hEqLit false subst
pure { mvarId := mvarId, elems := xs, subst := subst }
else
let (subst, mvarId) ← substCore mvarId hEq false subst
let diseqs := subgoal.newHs.map fun fvarId => (subst.get fvarId).fvarId!
pure { mvarId := mvarId, diseqs := diseqs, subst := subst }
end Lean.Meta
|
3396f63ee76d5c63b6cc3e02f9b149b0590dda66 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/analysis/convex/simplicial_complex/basic.lean | f29d4b338165830a4729f24a28f5515ad8304a7c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,921 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import analysis.convex.hull
import linear_algebra.affine_space.independent
/-!
# Simplicial complexes
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file, we define simplicial complexes in `𝕜`-modules. A simplicial complex is a collection
of simplices closed by inclusion (of vertices) and intersection (of underlying sets).
We model them by a downward-closed set of affine independent finite sets whose convex hulls "glue
nicely", each finite set and its convex hull corresponding respectively to the vertices and the
underlying set of a simplex.
## Main declarations
* `simplicial_complex 𝕜 E`: A simplicial complex in the `𝕜`-module `E`.
* `simplicial_complex.vertices`: The zero dimensional faces of a simplicial complex.
* `simplicial_complex.facets`: The maximal faces of a simplicial complex.
## Notation
`s ∈ K` means that `s` is a face of `K`.
`K ≤ L` means that the faces of `K` are faces of `L`.
## Implementation notes
"glue nicely" usually means that the intersection of two faces (as sets in the ambient space) is a
face. Given that we store the vertices, not the faces, this would be a bit awkward to spell.
Instead, `simplicial_complex.inter_subset_convex_hull` is an equivalent condition which works on the
vertices.
## TODO
Simplicial complexes can be generalized to affine spaces once `convex_hull` has been ported.
-/
open finset set
variables (𝕜 E : Type*) {ι : Type*} [ordered_ring 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E]
namespace geometry
/-- A simplicial complex in a `𝕜`-module is a collection of simplices which glue nicely together.
Note that the textbook meaning of "glue nicely" is given in
`geometry.simplicial_complex.disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convex_hull`. It is mostly useless, as
`geometry.simplicial_complex.convex_hull_inter_convex_hull` is enough for all purposes. -/
-- TODO: update to new binder order? not sure what binder order is correct for `down_closed`.
@[ext] structure simplicial_complex :=
(faces : set (finset E))
(not_empty_mem : ∅ ∉ faces)
(indep : ∀ {s}, s ∈ faces → affine_independent 𝕜 (coe : (s : set E) → E))
(down_closed : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ⊆ s → t ≠ ∅ → t ∈ faces)
(inter_subset_convex_hull : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ∈ faces →
convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t ⊆ convex_hull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : set E))
namespace simplicial_complex
variables {𝕜 E} {K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E} {s t : finset E} {x : E}
/-- A `finset` belongs to a `simplicial_complex` if it's a face of it. -/
instance : has_mem (finset E) (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) := ⟨λ s K, s ∈ K.faces⟩
/-- The underlying space of a simplicial complex is the union of its faces. -/
def space (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) : set E := ⋃ s ∈ K.faces, convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E)
lemma mem_space_iff : x ∈ K.space ↔ ∃ s ∈ K.faces, x ∈ convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) := mem_Union₂
lemma convex_hull_subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ⊆ K.space :=
subset_bUnion_of_mem hs
protected lemma subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : (s : set E) ⊆ K.space :=
(subset_convex_hull 𝕜 _).trans $ convex_hull_subset_space hs
lemma convex_hull_inter_convex_hull (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t = convex_hull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : set E) :=
(K.inter_subset_convex_hull hs ht).antisymm $ subset_inter
(convex_hull_mono $ set.inter_subset_left _ _) $ convex_hull_mono $ set.inter_subset_right _ _
/-- The conclusion is the usual meaning of "glue nicely" in textbooks. It turns out to be quite
unusable, as it's about faces as sets in space rather than simplices. Further, additional structure
on `𝕜` means the only choice of `u` is `s ∩ t` (but it's hard to prove). -/
lemma disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convex_hull (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
disjoint (convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E)) (convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t) ∨
∃ u ∈ K.faces, convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t = convex_hull 𝕜 ↑u :=
begin
classical,
by_contra' h,
refine h.2 (s ∩ t) (K.down_closed hs (inter_subset_left _ _) $ λ hst, h.1 $
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr $ (K.inter_subset_convex_hull hs ht).trans _) _,
{ rw [←coe_inter, hst, coe_empty, convex_hull_empty],
refl },
{ rw [coe_inter, convex_hull_inter_convex_hull hs ht] }
end
/-- Construct a simplicial complex by removing the empty face for you. -/
@[simps] def of_erase
(faces : set (finset E))
(indep : ∀ s ∈ faces, affine_independent 𝕜 (coe : (s : set E) → E))
(down_closed : ∀ s ∈ faces, ∀ t ⊆ s, t ∈ faces)
(inter_subset_convex_hull : ∀ s t ∈ faces,
convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t ⊆ convex_hull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : set E)) :
simplicial_complex 𝕜 E :=
{ faces := faces \ {∅},
not_empty_mem := λ h, h.2 (mem_singleton _),
indep := λ s hs, indep _ hs.1,
down_closed := λ s t hs hts ht, ⟨down_closed _ hs.1 _ hts, ht⟩,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s t hs ht, inter_subset_convex_hull _ hs.1 _ ht.1 }
/-- Construct a simplicial complex as a subset of a given simplicial complex. -/
@[simps] def of_subcomplex (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E)
(faces : set (finset E))
(subset : faces ⊆ K.faces)
(down_closed : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ⊆ s → t ∈ faces) :
simplicial_complex 𝕜 E :=
{ faces := faces,
not_empty_mem := λ h, K.not_empty_mem (subset h),
indep := λ s hs, K.indep (subset hs),
down_closed := λ s t hs hts _, down_closed hs hts,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s t hs ht, K.inter_subset_convex_hull (subset hs) (subset ht) }
/-! ### Vertices -/
/-- The vertices of a simplicial complex are its zero dimensional faces. -/
def vertices (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) : set E := {x | {x} ∈ K.faces}
lemma mem_vertices : x ∈ K.vertices ↔ {x} ∈ K.faces := iff.rfl
lemma vertices_eq : K.vertices = ⋃ k ∈ K.faces, (k : set E) :=
begin
ext x,
refine ⟨λ h, mem_bUnion h $ mem_coe.2 $ mem_singleton_self x, λ h, _⟩,
obtain ⟨s, hs, hx⟩ := mem_Union₂.1 h,
exact K.down_closed hs (finset.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ mem_coe.1 hx) (singleton_ne_empty _),
end
lemma vertices_subset_space : K.vertices ⊆ K.space :=
vertices_eq.subset.trans $ Union₂_mono $ λ x hx, subset_convex_hull 𝕜 x
lemma vertex_mem_convex_hull_iff (hx : x ∈ K.vertices) (hs : s ∈ K.faces) :
x ∈ convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) ↔ x ∈ s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, subset_convex_hull _ _ h⟩,
classical,
have h := K.inter_subset_convex_hull hx hs ⟨by simp, h⟩,
by_contra H,
rwa [←coe_inter, finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1
(finset.disjoint_singleton_right.2 H).symm, coe_empty, convex_hull_empty] at h,
end
/-- A face is a subset of another one iff its vertices are. -/
lemma face_subset_face_iff (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
convex_hull 𝕜 (s : set E) ⊆ convex_hull 𝕜 ↑t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨λ h x hxs, (vertex_mem_convex_hull_iff (K.down_closed hs (finset.singleton_subset_iff.2 hxs) $
singleton_ne_empty _) ht).1 (h (subset_convex_hull 𝕜 ↑s hxs)), convex_hull_mono⟩
/-! ### Facets -/
/-- A facet of a simplicial complex is a maximal face. -/
def facets (K : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) : set (finset E) :=
{s ∈ K.faces | ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ K.faces → s ⊆ t → s = t}
lemma mem_facets : s ∈ K.facets ↔ s ∈ K.faces ∧ ∀ t ∈ K.faces, s ⊆ t → s = t := mem_sep_iff
lemma facets_subset : K.facets ⊆ K.faces := λ s hs, hs.1
lemma not_facet_iff_subface (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : (s ∉ K.facets ↔ ∃ t, t ∈ K.faces ∧ s ⊂ t) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ (hs' : ¬ (_ ∧ _)), _, _⟩,
{ push_neg at hs',
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs' hs,
exact ⟨t, ht.1, ⟨ht.2.1, (λ hts, ht.2.2 (subset.antisymm ht.2.1 hts))⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨t, ht⟩ ⟨hs, hs'⟩,
have := hs' ht.1 ht.2.1,
rw this at ht,
exact ht.2.2 (subset.refl t) } -- `has_ssubset.ssubset.ne` would be handy here
end
/-!
### The semilattice of simplicial complexes
`K ≤ L` means that `K.faces ⊆ L.faces`.
-/
variables (𝕜 E)
/-- The complex consisting of only the faces present in both of its arguments. -/
instance : has_inf (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
⟨λ K L, { faces := K.faces ∩ L.faces,
not_empty_mem := λ h, K.not_empty_mem (set.inter_subset_left _ _ h),
indep := λ s hs, K.indep hs.1,
down_closed := λ s t hs hst ht, ⟨K.down_closed hs.1 hst ht, L.down_closed hs.2 hst ht⟩,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s t hs ht, K.inter_subset_convex_hull hs.1 ht.1 }⟩
instance : semilattice_inf (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
{ inf := (⊓),
inf_le_left := λ K L s hs, hs.1,
inf_le_right := λ K L s hs, hs.2,
le_inf := λ K L M hKL hKM s hs, ⟨hKL hs, hKM hs⟩,
.. (partial_order.lift faces $ λ x y, ext _ _) }
instance : has_bot (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ faces := ∅,
not_empty_mem := set.not_mem_empty ∅,
indep := λ s hs, (set.not_mem_empty _ hs).elim,
down_closed := λ s _ hs, (set.not_mem_empty _ hs).elim,
inter_subset_convex_hull := λ s _ hs, (set.not_mem_empty _ hs).elim }⟩
instance : order_bot (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) :=
{ bot_le := λ K, set.empty_subset _, .. simplicial_complex.has_bot 𝕜 E }
instance : inhabited (simplicial_complex 𝕜 E) := ⟨⊥⟩
variables {𝕜 E}
lemma faces_bot : (⊥ : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E).faces = ∅ := rfl
lemma space_bot : (⊥ : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E).space = ∅ := set.bUnion_empty _
lemma facets_bot : (⊥ : simplicial_complex 𝕜 E).facets = ∅ := eq_empty_of_subset_empty facets_subset
end simplicial_complex
end geometry
|
1e5dc1ac9abe1da7fd629bd8355ce1f40040daa1 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/measure_theory/category/Meas.lean | a1edbaafd86dae82add0e907625f85aecd3da35b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,316 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import topology.category.Top.basic
import measure_theory.giry_monad
import category_theory.monad.algebra
/-!
# The category of measurable spaces
Measurable spaces and measurable functions form a (concrete) category `Meas`.
## Main definitions
* `Measure : Meas ⥤ Meas`: the functor which sends a measurable space `X`
to the space of measures on `X`; it is a monad (the "Giry monad").
* `Borel : Top ⥤ Meas`: sends a topological space `X` to `X` equipped with the
`σ`-algebra of Borel sets (the `σ`-algebra generated by the open subsets of `X`).
## Tags
measurable space, giry monad, borel
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory measure_theory
open_locale ennreal
universes u v
/-- The category of measurable spaces and measurable functions. -/
@[derive has_coe_to_sort]
def Meas : Type (u+1) := bundled measurable_space
namespace Meas
instance (X : Meas) : measurable_space X := X.str
/-- Construct a bundled `Meas` from the underlying type and the typeclass. -/
def of (α : Type u) [measurable_space α] : Meas := ⟨α⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_of (X : Type u) [measurable_space X] : (of X : Type u) = X := rfl
instance unbundled_hom : unbundled_hom @measurable := ⟨@measurable_id, @measurable.comp⟩
attribute [derive [large_category, concrete_category]] Meas
instance : inhabited Meas := ⟨Meas.of empty⟩
/-- `Measure X` is the measurable space of measures over the measurable space `X`. It is the
weakest measurable space, s.t. λμ, μ s is measurable for all measurable sets `s` in `X`. An
important purpose is to assign a monadic structure on it, the Giry monad. In the Giry monad,
the pure values are the Dirac measure, and the bind operation maps to the integral:
`(μ >>= ν) s = ∫ x. (ν x) s dμ`.
In probability theory, the `Meas`-morphisms `X → Prob X` are (sub-)Markov kernels (here `Prob` is
the restriction of `Measure` to (sub-)probability space.)
-/
def Measure : Meas ⥤ Meas :=
{ obj := λX, ⟨@measure_theory.measure X.1 X.2⟩,
map := λX Y f, ⟨measure.map (f : X → Y), measure.measurable_map f f.2⟩,
map_id' := assume ⟨α, I⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.map_id α I μ,
map_comp':=
assume X Y Z ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, (measure.map_map hg hf).symm }
/-- The Giry monad, i.e. the monadic structure associated with `Measure`. -/
def Giry : category_theory.monad Meas :=
{ to_functor := Measure,
η' :=
{ app := λX, ⟨@measure.dirac X.1 X.2, measure.measurable_dirac⟩,
naturality' :=
assume X Y ⟨f, hf⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume a, (measure.map_dirac hf a).symm },
μ' :=
{ app := λX, ⟨@measure.join X.1 X.2, measure.measurable_join⟩,
naturality' :=
assume X Y ⟨f, hf⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, measure.join_map_map hf μ },
assoc' := assume α, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.join_map_join _ _ _,
left_unit' := assume α, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.join_dirac _ _ _,
right_unit' := assume α, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.join_map_dirac _ _ _ }
/-- An example for an algebra on `Measure`: the nonnegative Lebesgue integral is a hom, behaving
nicely under the monad operations. -/
def Integral : Giry.algebra :=
{ A := Meas.of ℝ≥0∞ ,
a := ⟨λm:measure ℝ≥0∞, ∫⁻ x, x ∂m, measure.measurable_lintegral measurable_id ⟩,
unit' := subtype.eq $ funext $ assume r:ℝ≥0∞, lintegral_dirac' _ measurable_id,
assoc' := subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ : measure (measure ℝ≥0∞),
show ∫⁻ x, x ∂ μ.join = ∫⁻ x, x ∂ (measure.map (λm:measure ℝ≥0∞, ∫⁻ x, x ∂m) μ),
by rw [measure.lintegral_join, lintegral_map];
apply_rules [measurable_id, measure.measurable_lintegral] }
end Meas
instance Top.has_forget_to_Meas : has_forget₂ Top.{u} Meas.{u} :=
bundled_hom.mk_has_forget₂
borel
(λ X Y f, ⟨f.1, f.2.borel_measurable⟩)
(by intros; refl)
/-- The Borel functor, the canonical embedding of topological spaces into measurable spaces. -/
@[reducible] def Borel : Top.{u} ⥤ Meas.{u} := forget₂ Top.{u} Meas.{u}
|
df4ad57aafa5b64ce68bf4eac0ab6a7a1d2a3f34 | db7384d2e2fd918ae6383e28c1e441b390107ab9 | /examples/category/monoidal.hlean | 7449c1bf5bc6f697733b83050049ff0692a5b41a | [] | no_license | minfuk/leanprover | f08a8ec10d9e210d4f1bf388c61201a68588faaf | d51a8eb4e829ecef546e86f3915a58762cc7d3b9 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,996,825,236 | 1,459,673,617,000 | 1,459,673,617,000 | 55,336,710 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 316 | hlean | import algebra.category.precategory algebra.category.category
algebra.category.functor.basic algebra.category.functor.equivalence
algebra.category.nat_trans
algebra.category.constructions.product algebra.category.constructions.functor
open eq prod category functor iso prod.ops nat_trans category.hom
|
3e94450274656826dc44b62810893b299d5840f8 | c19879c147c0dff0a7348a8264e74b58a37969c4 | /src/01_basics.lean | 64a961d9754511e657db240f5e3124303347674b | [] | no_license | gebner/leantogether2019_tutorial | f2aac98f2097bd6ac8ce396abc9a676f0eda71bd | 21b4dc890f964fc98837129094b8bab68363349f | refs/heads/master | 1,586,899,127,009 | 1,546,796,548,000 | 1,546,796,548,000 | 164,124,225 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,319 | lean | /-
Definitions
-/
def square (m : ℕ) : ℕ :=
m * m
-- We can write the same function as a lambda
def square' : ℕ → ℕ :=
λ (m : ℕ), m * m
-- ... or using pattern matching
def square'' : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (m+1) := square'' m + 2 * m + 1
/-
Interactive commands
-/
#print square'
#eval square' 12
#check square
#check λ x, square (string.length x)
example (x : ℕ) : ℕ := square'' (2*x)
#check ℕ → ℕ
#check ∀ x : ℕ, x = x
#check Π n : ℕ, array n ℕ
/-
Polymorphic definitions
-/
#check ℕ
#check Type
#check Type 1
#check Type 2
universes u v
#check Type u
-- polymorphic functions take the type as an extra argument
def injective (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ x y, f x = f y → x = y
#check injective ℕ ℕ nat.succ
-- using curly braces, Lean will fill in the type automatically ("implicit argument")
def injective' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) : Prop :=
injective α β f
#check injective ℕ ℕ nat.succ
#check injective' nat.succ
/-
Inductive types (≃ free algebras)
-/
-- "Let mynat be the smallest set containing zero and succ x for every x ∈ mynat"
inductive mynat : Type
| zero : mynat
| succ (x : mynat) : mynat
#check mynat
#check mynat.zero
#check mynat.succ
#check mynat.rec
/-
Inductive predicates
-/
-- The same mechanism can also define predicates
-- "Let le be the smallest relation containg ..."
inductive mynat.le : mynat → mynat → Prop
| refl {a} : mynat.le a a
| step {a b} : mynat.le a b → mynat.le a (mynat.succ b)
/-
Recursion
-/
def mynat.add (m : mynat) : mynat → mynat
-- pattern matching only applies to the arguments after the colon
| mynat.zero := m
| (mynat.succ x) := mynat.succ (mynat.add x)
/-
Namespaces
-/
-- names in lean are separated by . (like / for file names)
#check mynat.add
-- after open, we no longer need to write the prefix
open mynat
#check add
#eval add (succ zero) (succ zero)
-- adds the prefix to all definitions
namespace mynat.foo
namespace bar
def baz := succ zero
end bar
end mynat.foo
#check mynat.foo.bar.baz
#print prefix mynat
/-
Structures
-/
structure point (α : Type u) :=
(x : α)
(y : α)
def pt : point ℕ := { y := 1, x := 2 }
#eval pt.y
#eval point.y pt
example : point ℕ := point.mk 1 2
example : point ℕ := ⟨1, 2⟩
example := { point . x := 1, y := 2 }
example : point ℕ := { x := 1, y := 2 }
example := { pt with x := 5 }
structure point3 (α : Type u) extends point α :=
(z : α)
example : point3 ℕ := { pt with z := 3 }
/-
Type classes
-/
-- type classes allow us to define 0, 1, +, etc. for arbitrary objects
#check (0 : mynat)
#check (1 : mynat)
#check zero + zero
-- type class instances are just structures:
instance : has_zero mynat :=
{ zero := mynat.zero }
#print instances has_zero
#check (0 : mynat)
instance : has_add mynat :=
{ add := mynat.add }
#check (0 + 0 : mynat)
@[instance] -- instances are just definitions with the [instance] "attribute"
def mynat.has_one : has_one mynat :=
⟨succ zero⟩ -- any structure instance syntax works
-- now numerals work!
#check (7 : mynat)
-- type class arguments are written in square brackets
def double {α : Type u} [has_add α] (x : α) :=
x + x
#check double (7 : mynat)
/-
Logical connectives
-/
section
-- Variables in a section are implicitly added
-- to all definitions/theorems/etc. (as needed)
variables (p q : Prop) (r : mynat → Prop)
#check p → q
#check ∀ x, r x
#check true
#check false
#check 0 = 1
#check 0 = (1 : mynat)
#check p ∨ q
#check ¬q
#check p ∧ q
#check p ↔ q
#check ∃ x, r x
#check ∀ x < 100, ∃ y > 20, ∃ z ∈ {0,1,2,3}, ∃ w, x+y = z+w
end
/-
Tactics produce either a single new tactic state, or fail.
A tactic state is essentially a list of goals.
-/
lemma p1_1 {a b : Prop} : a → b → b ∧ a :=
begin
intros ha hb,
apply and.intro,
assumption,
assumption,
end
-- we can freely mix tactics and expressions
#check fin.mk -- (fin n) are the natural numbers less than n
example (n : ℕ) : fin (2*n + 7) :=
fin.mk n (begin end) -- failing tactics are underlined in red
lemma p1_2 {a b : Prop} : a → b → b ∧ a :=
begin
intros ha hb,
apply and.intro,
-- repeats a tactic until it fails
repeat { assumption },
end
lemma p1_6 {a b : Prop} : a → b → b ∧ a :=
-- ; executes the right tactic on all new goals
by intros ha hb; apply and.intro; assumption
lemma p2 (x : ℕ) : true ∧ x = x :=
-- the orelse (<|>) operator allows backtracking
by constructor; trivial <|> refl
/-
Rewriting
-/
lemma p3 (f : ℕ → ℕ) (a b : ℕ) (h : f (1 * (0 + a)) = f b) : f a = f (0 + b) :=
begin
-- The `rw` tactic takes a (quantified) equation and rewrites the goal using it
rw zero_add,
-- You can also pass it multiple equations, and/or rewrite hypotheses
rw [zero_add, one_mul] at h,
assumption,
end
/-
Induction
-/
lemma mynat.zero_add {a : mynat} : 0 + a = a :=
begin
induction a,
end
/-
Theorems
-/
lemma mynat.add_comm (a b : mynat) : a + b = b + a :=
begin
end
lemma mynat.add_assoc (a b c : mynat) : a + b + c = a + (b + c) :=
begin
end
-- It's boring to write (a b c : mynat) every time.
section
variables (a b c : mynat)
lemma mynat.eq_iff_succ_eq_succ : succ a = succ b → a = b :=
begin
end
lemma mynat.add_cancel_right : a + c = b + c → a = b :=
begin
end
end
/-
Notations
-/
notation `ℕ'` := mynat
#check (5 : ℕ')
-- supports various fancy stuff, e.g. mixfix operators and binders
def mysum {α} [has_add α] : mynat → (mynat → α) → α
| 0 f := f 0
| (succ a) f := mysum a f + f (succ a)
local notation `sum` binder `until` b `of` f:(scoped x, x) :=
mysum b f
#check sum i until 10 of i+20
#eval sum i until 10 of i+20
/-
There are two different kinds of "truth values":
- Prop: types, erased at runtime
^^^^ this is what you use to state theorems
- bool: inductive type with values tt/ff, computable
-/
#check true ∧ false ∨ true
#check tt && ff || tt
-- Lean automatically converts ("coerces") bools into Props
-- x is coerced into x = tt
example : (tt : Prop) := rfl
-- We can convert a Prop p into a bool if it is "decidable",
-- i.e. there is a function that computes whether p is true or not
#eval (∀ x ∈ [1,2,3,4], x^2 < x + 10 : bool)
-- decidable is implemented as a typeclass, and you can add your own instances
#print instances decidable
-- Many definitions in Lean use decidable propositions instead of bool:
#eval if ∀ x ∈ [1,2,3,4], x^2 < x + 10 then "ok" else "ko"
#check guard $ ∀ x ∈ [1,2,3,4], x^2 < x + 10
#check list.filter (λ x, x^2 < x + 10)
-- Choice implies that all propositions are decidable.
-- If we mark `classical.prop_decidable` as a type-class instance,
-- then if-then-else works on all propositions.
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
-- However we cannot execute definitions that use choice to
-- construct data, such definitions are then marked as "noncomputable".
noncomputable def find_zero (f : ℕ → ℕ) : ℕ :=
if h : ∃ i, f i = 0 then classical.some h else 0
#eval find_zero (λ x, 1)
/-
Definitional equality
-/
-- the free monoid generated by ℕ'
#check list mynat
#check ([1,4,3] : list mynat)
-- the free monoid generated by the carrier of the free monoid generated by ℕ'
#check list (list mynat)
def nested_list (α : Type u) : ℕ → Type u
| 0 := α
-- recursive calls only have arguments from after the colon
| (n+1) := list (nested_list n)
#reduce nested_list ℕ' 5
-- Why does this work?
example (n : ℕ) (xs : nested_list ℕ' (n+1)) :=
list.length xs -- xs needs to be a (list _) here, but it's a nested_list!
-- (nested_list _ (n+1)) reduces to a (list _):
#reduce λ n, nested_list ℕ' (n+1)
-- This is called "definitional equality".
-- In the underlying logic of Lean, both terms can be used interchangeably*.
#reduce λ n, n+1
#reduce λ n, 1+n
-- We can of course write functions that return nested_list
def n_singleton {α : Type u} : ∀ n, α → nested_list α n
-- in the base case, the return type is (nested_list α 0) =def= α
| 0 a := a
-- in the step case, the return type is
-- (nested_list α (n+1)) =def= (list (nested_list α n))
| (n+1) a := [n_singleton n a]
|
f6b4bdcec21b48a2403050300e31de91d6b8a357 | a4673261e60b025e2c8c825dfa4ab9108246c32e | /src/Std/Data/PersistentHashMap.lean | 33f8b67367031dedd6831ed80cf8fbb1b06c369a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/lean4 | c02dec0cc32c4bccab009285475f265f17d73228 | 2909313475588cc20ac0436e55548a4502050d0a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,129,550,893 | 1,606,415,348,000 | 1,606,415,348,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,382 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
namespace Std
universes u v w w'
namespace PersistentHashMap
inductive Entry (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (σ : Type w) :=
| entry (key : α) (val : β) : Entry α β σ
| ref (node : σ) : Entry α β σ
| null : Entry α β σ
instance {α β σ} : Inhabited (Entry α β σ) := ⟨Entry.null⟩
inductive Node (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : Type (max u v) :=
| entries (es : Array (Entry α β (Node α β))) : Node α β
| collision (ks : Array α) (vs : Array β) (h : ks.size = vs.size) : Node α β
instance {α β} : Inhabited (Node α β) := ⟨Node.entries #[]⟩
abbrev shift : USize := 5
abbrev branching : USize := USize.ofNat (2 ^ shift.toNat)
abbrev maxDepth : USize := 7
abbrev maxCollisions : Nat := 4
def mkEmptyEntriesArray {α β} : Array (Entry α β (Node α β)) :=
(Array.mkArray PersistentHashMap.branching.toNat PersistentHashMap.Entry.null)
end PersistentHashMap
structure PersistentHashMap (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [BEq α] [Hashable α] :=
(root : PersistentHashMap.Node α β := PersistentHashMap.Node.entries PersistentHashMap.mkEmptyEntriesArray)
(size : Nat := 0)
abbrev PHashMap (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [BEq α] [Hashable α] := PersistentHashMap α β
namespace PersistentHashMap
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
def empty [BEq α] [Hashable α] : PersistentHashMap α β := {}
def isEmpty [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : PersistentHashMap α β) : Bool :=
m.size == 0
instance [BEq α] [Hashable α] : Inhabited (PersistentHashMap α β) := ⟨{}⟩
def mkEmptyEntries {α β} : Node α β :=
Node.entries mkEmptyEntriesArray
abbrev mul2Shift (i : USize) (shift : USize) : USize := i.shiftLeft shift
abbrev div2Shift (i : USize) (shift : USize) : USize := i.shiftRight shift
abbrev mod2Shift (i : USize) (shift : USize) : USize := USize.land i ((USize.shiftLeft 1 shift) - 1)
inductive IsCollisionNode : Node α β → Prop :=
| mk (keys : Array α) (vals : Array β) (h : keys.size = vals.size) : IsCollisionNode (Node.collision keys vals h)
abbrev CollisionNode (α β) := { n : Node α β // IsCollisionNode n }
inductive IsEntriesNode : Node α β → Prop :=
| mk (entries : Array (Entry α β (Node α β))) : IsEntriesNode (Node.entries entries)
abbrev EntriesNode (α β) := { n : Node α β // IsEntriesNode n }
private theorem setSizeEq {ks : Array α} {vs : Array β} (h : ks.size = vs.size) (i : Fin ks.size) (j : Fin vs.size) (k : α) (v : β)
: (ks.set i k).size = (vs.set j v).size := by
rw [Array.sizeSetEq, Array.sizeSetEq vs, h]
rfl
private theorem pushSizeEq {ks : Array α} {vs : Array β} (h : ks.size = vs.size) (k : α) (v : β) : (ks.push k).size = (vs.push v).size := by
rw [Array.sizePushEq, Array.sizePushEq, h]
rfl
partial def insertAtCollisionNodeAux [BEq α] : CollisionNode α β → Nat → α → β → CollisionNode α β
| n@⟨Node.collision keys vals heq, _⟩, i, k, v =>
if h : i < keys.size then
let idx : Fin keys.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
let k' := keys.get idx;
if k == k' then
let j : Fin vals.size := ⟨i, by rw [←heq]; assumption⟩
⟨Node.collision (keys.set idx k) (vals.set j v) (setSizeEq heq idx j k v), IsCollisionNode.mk _ _ _⟩
else insertAtCollisionNodeAux n (i+1) k v
else
⟨Node.collision (keys.push k) (vals.push v) (pushSizeEq heq k v), IsCollisionNode.mk _ _ _⟩
| ⟨Node.entries _, h⟩, _, _, _ => False.elim (nomatch h)
def insertAtCollisionNode [BEq α] : CollisionNode α β → α → β → CollisionNode α β :=
fun n k v => insertAtCollisionNodeAux n 0 k v
def getCollisionNodeSize : CollisionNode α β → Nat
| ⟨Node.collision keys _ _, _⟩ => keys.size
| ⟨Node.entries _, h⟩ => False.elim (nomatch h)
def mkCollisionNode (k₁ : α) (v₁ : β) (k₂ : α) (v₂ : β) : Node α β :=
let ks : Array α := Array.mkEmpty maxCollisions
let ks := (ks.push k₁).push k₂
let vs : Array β := Array.mkEmpty maxCollisions
let vs := (vs.push v₁).push v₂
Node.collision ks vs rfl
partial def insertAux [BEq α] [Hashable α] : Node α β → USize → USize → α → β → Node α β
| Node.collision keys vals heq, _, depth, k, v =>
let newNode := insertAtCollisionNode ⟨Node.collision keys vals heq, IsCollisionNode.mk _ _ _⟩ k v
if depth >= maxDepth || getCollisionNodeSize newNode < maxCollisions then newNode.val
else match newNode with
| ⟨Node.entries _, h⟩ => False.elim (nomatch h)
| ⟨Node.collision keys vals heq, _⟩ =>
let rec traverse (i : Nat) (entries : Node α β) : Node α β :=
if h : i < keys.size then
let k := keys.get ⟨i, h⟩
let v := vals.get ⟨i, heq ▸ h⟩
let h := hash k
let h := div2Shift h (shift * (depth - 1))
traverse (i+1) (insertAux entries h depth k v)
else
entries
traverse 0 mkEmptyEntries
| Node.entries entries, h, depth, k, v =>
let j := (mod2Shift h shift).toNat
Node.entries $ entries.modify j fun entry =>
match entry with
| Entry.null => Entry.entry k v
| Entry.ref node => Entry.ref $ insertAux node (div2Shift h shift) (depth+1) k v
| Entry.entry k' v' =>
if k == k' then Entry.entry k v
else Entry.ref $ mkCollisionNode k' v' k v
def insert [BEq α] [Hashable α] : PersistentHashMap α β → α → β → PersistentHashMap α β
| { root := n, size := sz }, k, v => { root := insertAux n (hash k) 1 k v, size := sz + 1 }
partial def findAtAux [BEq α] (keys : Array α) (vals : Array β) (heq : keys.size = vals.size) (i : Nat) (k : α) : Option β :=
if h : i < keys.size then
let k' := keys.get ⟨i, h⟩
if k == k' then some (vals.get ⟨i, by rw [←heq]; assumption⟩)
else findAtAux keys vals heq (i+1) k
else none
partial def findAux [BEq α] : Node α β → USize → α → Option β
| Node.entries entries, h, k =>
let j := (mod2Shift h shift).toNat
match entries.get! j with
| Entry.null => none
| Entry.ref node => findAux node (div2Shift h shift) k
| Entry.entry k' v => if k == k' then some v else none
| Node.collision keys vals heq, _, k => findAtAux keys vals heq 0 k
def find? [BEq α] [Hashable α] : PersistentHashMap α β → α → Option β
| { root := n, .. }, k => findAux n (hash k) k
@[inline] def getOp [BEq α] [Hashable α] (self : PersistentHashMap α β) (idx : α) : Option β :=
self.find? idx
@[inline] def findD [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : PersistentHashMap α β) (a : α) (b₀ : β) : β :=
(m.find? a).getD b₀
@[inline] def find! [BEq α] [Hashable α] [Inhabited β] (m : PersistentHashMap α β) (a : α) : β :=
match m.find? a with
| some b => b
| none => panic! "key is not in the map"
partial def findEntryAtAux [BEq α] (keys : Array α) (vals : Array β) (heq : keys.size = vals.size) (i : Nat) (k : α) : Option (α × β) :=
if h : i < keys.size then
let k' := keys.get ⟨i, h⟩
if k == k' then some (k', vals.get ⟨i, by rw [←heq]; assumption⟩)
else findEntryAtAux keys vals heq (i+1) k
else none
partial def findEntryAux [BEq α] : Node α β → USize → α → Option (α × β)
| Node.entries entries, h, k =>
let j := (mod2Shift h shift).toNat
match entries.get! j with
| Entry.null => none
| Entry.ref node => findEntryAux node (div2Shift h shift) k
| Entry.entry k' v => if k == k' then some (k', v) else none
| Node.collision keys vals heq, _, k => findEntryAtAux keys vals heq 0 k
def findEntry? [BEq α] [Hashable α] : PersistentHashMap α β → α → Option (α × β)
| { root := n, .. }, k => findEntryAux n (hash k) k
partial def containsAtAux [BEq α] (keys : Array α) (vals : Array β) (heq : keys.size = vals.size) (i : Nat) (k : α) : Bool :=
if h : i < keys.size then
let k' := keys.get ⟨i, h⟩
if k == k' then true
else containsAtAux keys vals heq (i+1) k
else false
partial def containsAux [BEq α] : Node α β → USize → α → Bool
| Node.entries entries, h, k =>
let j := (mod2Shift h shift).toNat
match entries.get! j with
| Entry.null => false
| Entry.ref node => containsAux node (div2Shift h shift) k
| Entry.entry k' v => k == k'
| Node.collision keys vals heq, _, k => containsAtAux keys vals heq 0 k
def contains [BEq α] [Hashable α] : PersistentHashMap α β → α → Bool
| { root := n, .. }, k => containsAux n (hash k) k
partial def isUnaryEntries (a : Array (Entry α β (Node α β))) (i : Nat) (acc : Option (α × β)) : Option (α × β) :=
if h : i < a.size then
match a.get ⟨i, h⟩ with
| Entry.null => isUnaryEntries a (i+1) acc
| Entry.ref _ => none
| Entry.entry k v =>
match acc with
| none => isUnaryEntries a (i+1) (some (k, v))
| some _ => none
else acc
def isUnaryNode : Node α β → Option (α × β)
| Node.entries entries => isUnaryEntries entries 0 none
| Node.collision keys vals heq =>
if h : 1 = keys.size then
have 0 < keys.size by rw [←h]; decide!
some (keys.get ⟨0, this⟩, vals.get ⟨0, by rw [←heq]; assumption⟩)
else
none
partial def eraseAux [BEq α] : Node α β → USize → α → Node α β × Bool
| n@(Node.collision keys vals heq), _, k =>
match keys.indexOf? k with
| some idx =>
let ⟨keys', keq⟩ := keys.eraseIdx' idx
let ⟨vals', veq⟩ := vals.eraseIdx' (Eq.ndrec idx heq)
have keys.size - 1 = vals.size - 1 by rw [heq]; rfl
(Node.collision keys' vals' (keq.trans (this.trans veq.symm)), true)
| none => (n, false)
| n@(Node.entries entries), h, k =>
let j := (mod2Shift h shift).toNat
let entry := entries.get! j
match entry with
| Entry.null => (n, false)
| Entry.entry k' v =>
if k == k' then (Node.entries (entries.set! j Entry.null), true) else (n, false)
| Entry.ref node =>
let entries := entries.set! j Entry.null
let (newNode, deleted) := eraseAux node (div2Shift h shift) k
if !deleted then (n, false)
else match isUnaryNode newNode with
| none => (Node.entries (entries.set! j (Entry.ref newNode)), true)
| some (k, v) => (Node.entries (entries.set! j (Entry.entry k v)), true)
def erase [BEq α] [Hashable α] : PersistentHashMap α β → α → PersistentHashMap α β
| { root := n, size := sz }, k =>
let h := hash k
let (n, del) := eraseAux n h k
{ root := n, size := if del then sz - 1 else sz }
section
variables {m : Type w → Type w'} [Monad m]
variables {σ : Type w}
@[specialize] partial def foldlMAux (f : σ → α → β → m σ) : Node α β → σ → m σ
| Node.collision keys vals heq, acc =>
let rec traverse (i : Nat) (acc : σ) : m σ := do
if h : i < keys.size then
let k := keys.get ⟨i, h⟩
let v := vals.get ⟨i, heq ▸ h⟩
traverse (i+1) (← f acc k v)
else
pure acc
traverse 0 acc
| Node.entries entries, acc => entries.foldlM (fun acc entry =>
match entry with
| Entry.null => pure acc
| Entry.entry k v => f acc k v
| Entry.ref node => foldlMAux f node acc)
acc
@[specialize] def foldlM [BEq α] [Hashable α] (map : PersistentHashMap α β) (f : σ → α → β → m σ) (init : σ) : m σ :=
foldlMAux f map.root init
@[specialize] def forM [BEq α] [Hashable α] (map : PersistentHashMap α β) (f : α → β → m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
map.foldlM (fun _ => f) ⟨⟩
@[specialize] def foldl [BEq α] [Hashable α] (map : PersistentHashMap α β) (f : σ → α → β → σ) (init : σ) : σ :=
Id.run $ map.foldlM f init
end
def toList [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : PersistentHashMap α β) : List (α × β) :=
m.foldl (init := []) fun ps k v => (k, v) :: ps
structure Stats :=
(numNodes : Nat := 0)
(numNull : Nat := 0)
(numCollisions : Nat := 0)
(maxDepth : Nat := 0)
partial def collectStats : Node α β → Stats → Nat → Stats
| Node.collision keys _ _, stats, depth =>
{ stats with
numNodes := stats.numNodes + 1,
numCollisions := stats.numCollisions + keys.size - 1,
maxDepth := Nat.max stats.maxDepth depth }
| Node.entries entries, stats, depth =>
let stats :=
{ stats with
numNodes := stats.numNodes + 1,
maxDepth := Nat.max stats.maxDepth depth }
entries.foldl (fun stats entry =>
match entry with
| Entry.null => { stats with numNull := stats.numNull + 1 }
| Entry.ref node => collectStats node stats (depth + 1)
| Entry.entry _ _ => stats)
stats
def stats [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : PersistentHashMap α β) : Stats :=
collectStats m.root {} 1
def Stats.toString (s : Stats) : String :=
s!"\{ nodes := {s.numNodes}, null := {s.numNull}, collisions := {s.numCollisions}, depth := {s.maxDepth}}"
instance : ToString Stats := ⟨Stats.toString⟩
end PersistentHashMap
end Std
|
95a385a70d16f5396100c35e42d5f05e9f8a89ae | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/data/sigma/lex_auto.lean | 50ca1760b44ec9e9059373daa5e2491fe6093cda | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,352 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.data.sigma.basic
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.default
universes u v
namespace Mathlib
namespace psigma
inductive lex {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : (a : α) → β a → β a → Prop) :
psigma β → psigma β → Prop
where
| left : ∀ {a₁ : α} (b₁ : β a₁) {a₂ : α} (b₂ : β a₂), r a₁ a₂ → lex r s (mk a₁ b₁) (mk a₂ b₂)
| right : ∀ (a : α) {b₁ b₂ : β a}, s a b₁ b₂ → lex r s (mk a b₁) (mk a b₂)
def lex_accessible {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : (a : α) → β a → β a → Prop}
{a : α} (aca : acc r a) (acb : ∀ (a : α), well_founded (s a)) (b : β a) :
acc (lex r s) (mk a b) :=
sorry
def lex_wf {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : (a : α) → β a → β a → Prop}
(ha : well_founded r) (hb : ∀ (x : α), well_founded (s x)) : well_founded (lex r s) :=
well_founded.intro fun (_x : psigma fun (a : α) => β a) => sorry
def lex_ndep {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) :
(psigma fun (a : α) => β) → (psigma fun (a : α) => β) → Prop :=
lex r fun (a : α) => s
def lex_ndep_wf {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
(ha : well_founded r) (hb : well_founded s) : well_founded (lex_ndep r s) :=
well_founded.intro fun (_x : psigma fun (a : α) => β) => sorry
inductive rev_lex {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) :
(psigma fun (a : α) => β) → (psigma fun (a : α) => β) → Prop
where
| left : ∀ {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : β), r a₁ a₂ → rev_lex r s (mk a₁ b) (mk a₂ b)
| right : ∀ (a₁ : α) {b₁ : β} (a₂ : α) {b₂ : β}, s b₁ b₂ → rev_lex r s (mk a₁ b₁) (mk a₂ b₂)
def rev_lex_accessible {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {b : β}
(acb : acc s b) (aca : ∀ (a : α), acc r a) (a : α) : acc (rev_lex r s) (mk a b) :=
sorry
def rev_lex_wf {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} (ha : well_founded r)
(hb : well_founded s) : well_founded (rev_lex r s) :=
well_founded.intro fun (_x : psigma fun (a : α) => β) => sorry
def skip_left (α : Type u) {β : Type v} (s : β → β → Prop) :
(psigma fun (a : α) => β) → (psigma fun (a : α) => β) → Prop :=
rev_lex empty_relation s
def skip_left_wf (α : Type u) {β : Type v} {s : β → β → Prop} (hb : well_founded s) :
well_founded (skip_left α s) :=
rev_lex_wf empty_wf hb
def mk_skip_left {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {b₁ : β} {b₂ : β} {s : β → β → Prop} (a₁ : α) (a₂ : α)
(h : s b₁ b₂) : skip_left α s (mk a₁ b₁) (mk a₂ b₂) :=
rev_lex.right a₁ a₂ h
protected instance has_well_founded {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [s₁ : has_well_founded α]
[s₂ : (a : α) → has_well_founded (β a)] : has_well_founded (psigma β) :=
has_well_founded.mk (lex has_well_founded.r fun (a : α) => has_well_founded.r) sorry
end Mathlib |
ff61d4a63424d4cc96596718150c3ec879e8664b | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/group_theory/general_commutator.lean | 40b8af50f46d00906ec827d0671102073687b132 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,393 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jordan Brown, Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jordan Brown, Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import data.bracket
import group_theory.subgroup.basic
import tactic.group
/-!
# General commutators.
If `G` is a group and `H₁ H₂ : subgroup G` then the general commutator `⁅H₁, H₂⁆ : subgroup G`
is the subgroup of `G` generated by the commutators `h₁ * h₂ * h₁⁻¹ * h₂⁻¹`.
## Main definitions
* `general_commutator H₁ H₂` : the commutator of the subgroups `H₁` and `H₂`
-/
open subgroup
variables {G G' : Type*} [group G] [group G'] {f : G →* G'}
/-- The commutator of two subgroups `H₁` and `H₂`. -/
instance general_commutator : has_bracket (subgroup G) (subgroup G) :=
⟨λ H₁ H₂, closure {x | ∃ (p ∈ H₁) (q ∈ H₂), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x}⟩
lemma general_commutator_def (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) :
⁅H₁, H₂⁆ = closure {x | ∃ (p ∈ H₁) (q ∈ H₂), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x} := rfl
instance general_commutator_normal (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) [h₁ : H₁.normal]
[h₂ : H₂.normal] : normal ⁅H₁, H₂⁆ :=
begin
let base : set G := {x | ∃ (p ∈ H₁) (q ∈ H₂), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x},
suffices h_base : base = group.conjugates_of_set base,
{ dsimp only [general_commutator_def, ←base],
rw h_base,
exact subgroup.normal_closure_normal },
apply set.subset.antisymm group.subset_conjugates_of_set,
intros a h,
simp_rw [group.mem_conjugates_of_set_iff, is_conj_iff] at h,
rcases h with ⟨b, ⟨c, hc, e, he, rfl⟩, d, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨d * c * d⁻¹, h₁.conj_mem c hc d, d * e * d⁻¹, h₂.conj_mem e he d, by group⟩,
end
lemma general_commutator_mono {H₁ H₂ K₁ K₂ : subgroup G} (h₁ : H₁ ≤ K₁) (h₂ : H₂ ≤ K₂) :
⁅H₁, H₂⁆ ≤ ⁅K₁, K₂⁆ :=
begin
apply closure_mono,
rintros x ⟨p, hp, q, hq, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨p, h₁ hp, q, h₂ hq, rfl⟩,
end
lemma general_commutator_def' (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) [H₁.normal] [H₂.normal] :
⁅H₁, H₂⁆ = normal_closure {x | ∃ (p ∈ H₁) (q ∈ H₂), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x} :=
by rw [← normal_closure_eq_self ⁅H₁, H₂⁆, general_commutator_def,
normal_closure_closure_eq_normal_closure]
lemma general_commutator_le (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) (K : subgroup G) :
⁅H₁, H₂⁆ ≤ K ↔ ∀ (p ∈ H₁) (q ∈ H₂), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ ∈ K :=
begin
rw [general_commutator, closure_le],
split,
{ intros h p hp q hq,
exact h ⟨p, hp, q, hq, rfl⟩, },
{ rintros h x ⟨p, hp, q, hq, rfl⟩,
exact h p hp q hq, }
end
lemma general_commutator_containment (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) {p q : G} (hp : p ∈ H₁) (hq : q ∈ H₂) :
p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ ∈ ⁅H₁, H₂⁆ :=
(general_commutator_le H₁ H₂ ⁅H₁, H₂⁆).mp (le_refl ⁅H₁, H₂⁆) p hp q hq
lemma general_commutator_comm (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) : ⁅H₁, H₂⁆ = ⁅H₂, H₁⁆ :=
begin
suffices : ∀ H₁ H₂ : subgroup G, ⁅H₁, H₂⁆ ≤ ⁅H₂, H₁⁆, { exact le_antisymm (this _ _) (this _ _) },
intros H₁ H₂,
rw general_commutator_le,
intros p hp q hq,
have h : (p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹)⁻¹ ∈ ⁅H₂, H₁⁆ := subset_closure ⟨q, hq, p, hp, by group⟩,
convert inv_mem ⁅H₂, H₁⁆ h,
group,
end
lemma general_commutator_le_right (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) [h : normal H₂] :
⁅H₁, H₂⁆ ≤ H₂ :=
begin
rw general_commutator_le,
intros p hp q hq,
exact mul_mem H₂ (h.conj_mem q hq p) (inv_mem H₂ hq),
end
lemma general_commutator_le_left (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) [h : normal H₁] :
⁅H₁, H₂⁆ ≤ H₁ :=
begin
rw general_commutator_comm,
exact general_commutator_le_right H₂ H₁,
end
@[simp] lemma general_commutator_bot (H : subgroup G) : ⁅H, ⊥⁆ = (⊥ : subgroup G) :=
by { rw eq_bot_iff, exact general_commutator_le_right H ⊥ }
@[simp] lemma bot_general_commutator (H : subgroup G) : ⁅(⊥ : subgroup G), H⁆ = (⊥ : subgroup G) :=
by { rw eq_bot_iff, exact general_commutator_le_left ⊥ H }
lemma general_commutator_le_inf (H₁ H₂ : subgroup G) [normal H₁] [normal H₂] :
⁅H₁, H₂⁆ ≤ H₁ ⊓ H₂ :=
by simp only [general_commutator_le_left, general_commutator_le_right, le_inf_iff, and_self]
|
06a543ebf1b8d1f2916e73addffedb56bcb46902 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/data/list/perm.lean | 0d13540ac5fb45225b9319808660e4f8802245e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,626 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
List permutations.
-/
import data.list.basic data.list.set
open list setoid nat binary
variables {A B : Type}
inductive perm : list A → list A → Prop :=
| nil : perm [] []
| skip : Π (x : A) {l₁ l₂ : list A}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm (x::l₁) (x::l₂)
| swap : Π (x y : A) (l : list A), perm (y::x::l) (x::y::l)
| trans : Π {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list A}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm l₂ l₃ → perm l₁ l₃
namespace perm
infix ~ := perm
theorem eq_nil_of_perm_nil {l₁ : list A} (p : [] ~ l₁) : l₁ = [] :=
sorry
/-
have gen : ∀ (l₂ : list A) (p : l₂ ~ l₁), l₂ = [] → l₁ = [], from
take l₂ p, perm.induction_on p
(λ h, h)
(by contradiction)
(by contradiction)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ e, r₂ (r₁ e)),
gen [] p rfl
-/
theorem not_perm_nil_cons (x : A) (l : list A) : ¬ [] ~ (x::l) :=
sorry
/-
have gen : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list A) (p : l₁ ~ l₂), l₁ = [] → l₂ = (x::l) → false, from
take l₁ l₂ p, perm.induction_on p
(by contradiction)
(by contradiction)
(by contradiction)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ e₁ e₂,
begin
rewrite [e₂ at *, e₁ at *],
have e₃ : l₂ = [], from eq_nil_of_perm_nil p₁,
exact (r₂ e₃ rfl)
end),
assume p, gen [] (x::l) p rfl rfl
-/
attribute [refl]
protected theorem refl : ∀ (l : list A), l ~ l
| [] := nil
| (x::xs) := skip x (refl xs)
attribute [symm]
protected theorem symm : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, l₁ ~ l₂ → l₂ ~ l₁ :=
take l₁ l₂ p, perm.induction_on p
nil
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, skip x r₁)
(λ x y l, swap y x l)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₂ r₁)
attribute perm.trans [trans]
theorem eqv (A : Type) : equivalence (@perm A) :=
mk_equivalence (@perm A) (@perm.refl A) (@perm.symm A) (@perm.trans A)
attribute [instance]
protected definition is_setoid (A : Type) : setoid (list A) :=
setoid.mk (@perm A) (perm.eqv A)
theorem mem_perm {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm.induction_on p
(λ h, h)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁ i, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons i)
(suppose a = x, by rewrite this; apply !mem_cons)
(suppose a ∈ l₁, or.inr (r₁ this)))
(λ x y l ainyxl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainyxl)
(suppose a = y, by rewrite this; exact (or.inr !mem_cons))
(suppose a ∈ x::l, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = x, or.inl this)
(suppose a ∈ l, or.inr (or.inr this))))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ ainl₁, r₂ (r₁ ainl₁))
-/
theorem not_mem_perm {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ :=
assume p nainl₁ ainl₂, absurd (mem_perm (perm.symm p) ainl₂) nainl₁
theorem perm_app_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (l₁++t₁) ~ (l₂++t₁) :=
assume p, perm.induction_on p
(perm.refl (list.nil ++ t₁))
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, skip x r₁)
(λ x y l, swap x y _)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm_app_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list A} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (l++t₁) ~ (l++t₂) :=
list.induction_on l
(λ p, p)
(λ x xs r p, skip x (r p))
theorem perm_app {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (l₁++t₁) ~ (l₂++t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_app_left t₁ p₁) (perm_app_right l₂ p₂)
theorem perm_app_cons (a : A) {h₁ h₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : h₁ ~ h₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (h₁ ++ (a::t₁)) ~ (h₂ ++ (a::t₂)) :=
assume p₁ p₂, perm_app p₁ (skip a p₂)
theorem perm_cons_app (a : A) : ∀ (l : list A), (a::l) ~ (l ++ [a])
| [] := perm.refl _
| (x::xs) := calc
a::x::xs ~ x::a::xs : swap x a xs
... ~ x::(xs++[a]) : skip x (perm_cons_app xs)
attribute [simp]
theorem perm_cons_app_simp (a : A) : ∀ (l : list A), (l ++ [a]) ~ (a::l) :=
take l, perm.symm (perm_cons_app a l)
attribute [simp]
theorem perm_app_comm {l₁ l₂ : list A} : (l₁++l₂) ~ (l₂++l₁) :=
sorry
/-
list.induction_on l₁
(by rewrite [append_nil_right, append_nil_left])
(λ a t r, calc
a::(t++l₂) ~ a::(l₂++t) : skip a r
... ~ l₂++t++[a] : !perm_cons_app
... = l₂++(t++[a]) : !append.assoc
... ~ l₂++(a::t) : perm_app_right l₂ (perm.symm (perm_cons_app a t)))
-/
theorem length_eq_length_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm.induction_on p
rfl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, by rewrite [*length_cons, r])
(λ x y l, by rewrite *length_cons)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, eq.trans r₁ r₂)
-/
theorem eq_singleton_of_perm_inv (a : A) {l : list A} : [a] ~ l → l = [a] :=
sorry
/-
have gen : ∀ l₂, perm l₂ l → l₂ = [a] → l = [a], from
take l₂, assume p, perm.induction_on p
(λ e, e)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r e,
begin
injection e with e₁ e₂,
rewrite [e₁, e₂ at p],
have h₁ : l₂ = [], from eq_nil_of_perm_nil p,
substvars
end)
(λ x y l e, by injection e; contradiction)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ e, r₂ (r₁ e)),
assume p, gen [a] p rfl
-/
theorem eq_singleton_of_perm (a b : A) : [a] ~ [b] → a = b :=
sorry
/-
assume p,
begin
injection eq_singleton_of_perm_inv a p with e₁,
rewrite e₁
end
-/
theorem perm_rev : ∀ (l : list A), l ~ (reverse l)
:= sorry
/-
| [] := nil
| (x::xs) := calc
x::xs ~ xs++[x] : perm_cons_app x xs
... ~ reverse xs ++ [x] : perm_app_left [x] (perm_rev xs)
... = reverse (x::xs) : by rewrite [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem perm_rev_simp : ∀ (l : list A), (reverse l) ~ l :=
take l, perm.symm (perm_rev l)
theorem perm_middle (a : A) (l₁ l₂ : list A) : (a::l₁)++l₂ ~ l₁++(a::l₂) :=
calc
(a::l₁) ++ l₂ = a::(l₁++l₂) : rfl
... ~ l₁++l₂++[a] : perm_cons_app a (l₁ ++ l₂)
... = l₁++(l₂++[a]) : append.assoc l₁ l₂ [a]
... ~ l₁++(a::l₂) : perm_app_right l₁ (perm.symm (perm_cons_app a l₂))
attribute [simp]
theorem perm_middle_simp (a : A) (l₁ l₂ : list A) : l₁++(a::l₂) ~ (a::l₁)++l₂ :=
perm.symm $ perm_middle a l₁ l₂
theorem perm_cons_app_cons {l l₁ l₂ : list A} (a : A) : l ~ l₁++l₂ → a::l ~ l₁++(a::l₂) :=
assume p, calc
a::l ~ l++[a] : perm_cons_app a l
... ~ l₁++l₂++[a] : perm_app_left [a] p
... = l₁++(l₂++[a]) : append.assoc l₁ l₂ [a]
... ~ l₁++(a::l₂) : perm_app_right l₁ (perm.symm (perm_cons_app a l₂))
open decidable
theorem perm_erase [decidable_eq A] {a : A} : ∀ {l : list A}, a ∈ l → l ~ a::(erase a l)
:= sorry
/-
| [] h := absurd h !not_mem_nil
| (x::t) h :=
by_cases
(assume aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx, erase_cons_head])
(assume naeqx : a ≠ x,
have aint : a ∈ t, from mem_of_ne_of_mem naeqx h,
have aux : t ~ a :: erase a t, from perm_erase aint,
calc x::t ~ x::a::(erase a t) : skip x aux
... ~ a::x::(erase a t) : !swap
... = a::(erase a (x::t)) : by rewrite [!erase_cons_tail naeqx])
-/
attribute [congr]
theorem erase_perm_erase_of_perm [decidable_eq A] (a : A) {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → erase a l₁ ~ erase a l₂ :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm.induction_on p
nil
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r,
by_cases
(assume aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx, *erase_cons_head]; exact p)
(assume naeqx : a ≠ x, by rewrite [*erase_cons_tail _ naeqx]; exact (skip x r)))
(λ x y l,
by_cases
(assume aeqx : a = x,
by_cases
(assume aeqy : a = y, by rewrite [-aeqx, -aeqy])
(assume naeqy : a ≠ y, by rewrite [-aeqx, erase_cons_tail _ naeqy, *erase_cons_head]))
(assume naeqx : a ≠ x,
by_cases
(assume aeqy : a = y, by rewrite [-aeqy, erase_cons_tail _ naeqx, *erase_cons_head])
(assume naeqy : a ≠ y, by rewrite[erase_cons_tail _ naeqx, *erase_cons_tail _ naeqy, erase_cons_tail _ naeqx];
exact !swap)))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
-/
theorem perm_induction_on {P : list A → list A → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list A} (p : l₁ ~ l₂)
(h₁ : P [] [])
(h₂ : ∀ x l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (x::l₁) (x::l₂))
(h₃ : ∀ x y l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (y::x::l₁) (x::y::l₂))
(h₄ : ∀ l₁ l₂ l₃, l₁ ~ l₂ → l₂ ~ l₃ → P l₁ l₂ → P l₂ l₃ → P l₁ l₃)
: P l₁ l₂ :=
have P_refl : ∀ l, P l l
| [] := h₁
| (x::xs) := h₂ x xs xs (perm.refl xs) (P_refl xs),
perm.induction_on p h₁ h₂ (λ x y l, h₃ x y l l (perm.refl l) (P_refl l)) h₄
theorem xswap {l₁ l₂ : list A} (x y : A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → x::y::l₁ ~ y::x::l₂ :=
assume p, calc
x::y::l₁ ~ y::x::l₁ : swap y x l₁
... ~ y::x::l₂ : skip y (skip x p)
attribute [congr]
theorem perm_map (f : A → B) {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → map f l₁ ~ map f l₂ :=
assume p, perm_induction_on p
nil
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, skip (f x) r)
(λ x y l₁ l₂ p r, xswap (f y) (f x) r)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
lemma perm_of_qeq {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁≈a|l₂ → l₁~a::l₂ :=
assume q, qeq.induction_on q
(λ h, perm.refl (a :: h))
(λ b t₁ t₂ q₁ r₁, calc
b::t₂ ~ b::a::t₁ : skip b r₁
... ~ a::b::t₁ : swap a b t₁)
/- permutation is decidable if A has decidable equality -/
section dec
open decidable
variable [Ha : decidable_eq A]
include Ha
definition decidable_perm_aux : ∀ (n : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list A), length l₁ = n → length l₂ = n → decidable (l₁ ~ l₂)
:= sorry
/-
| 0 l₁ l₂ H₁ H₂ :=
have l₁n : l₁ = [], from eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero H₁,
have l₂n : l₂ = [], from eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero H₂,
by rewrite [l₁n, l₂n]; exact (inl perm.nil)
| (n+1) (x::t₁) l₂ H₁ H₂ :=
by_cases
(assume xinl₂ : x ∈ l₂,
let t₂ : list A := erase x l₂ in
have len_t₁ : length t₁ = n, begin injection H₁ with e, exact e end,
have length t₂ = pred (length l₂), from length_erase_of_mem xinl₂,
have length t₂ = n, by rewrite [this, H₂],
match decidable_perm_aux n t₁ t₂ len_t₁ this with
| inl p := inl (calc
x::t₁ ~ x::(erase x l₂) : skip x p
... ~ l₂ : perm.symm (perm_erase xinl₂))
| inr np := inr (λ p : x::t₁ ~ l₂,
have erase x (x::t₁) ~ erase x l₂, from erase_perm_erase_of_perm x p,
have t₁ ~ erase x l₂, by rewrite [erase_cons_head at this]; exact this,
absurd this np)
end)
(assume nxinl₂ : x ∉ l₂,
inr (λ p : x::t₁ ~ l₂, absurd (mem_perm p !mem_cons) nxinl₂))
-/
attribute [instance]
definition decidable_perm : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list A), decidable (l₁ ~ l₂) :=
λ l₁ l₂,
by_cases
(assume eql : length l₁ = length l₂,
decidable_perm_aux (length l₂) l₁ l₂ eql rfl)
(assume neql : length l₁ ≠ length l₂,
ff (λ p : l₁ ~ l₂, absurd (length_eq_length_of_perm p) neql))
end dec
-- Auxiliary theorem for performing cases-analysis on l₂.
-- We use it to prove perm_inv_core.
private theorem discr {P : Prop} {a b : A} {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list A} :
a::l₁ = l₂++(b::l₃) →
(l₂ = [] → a = b → l₁ = l₃ → P) →
(∀ t, l₂ = a::t → l₁ = t++(b::l₃) → P) → P :=
sorry
/-
match l₂ with
| [] := λ e h₁ h₂, by injection e with e₁ e₂; exact h₁ rfl e₁ e₂
| h::t := λ e h₁ h₂,
begin
injection e with e₁ e₂,
rewrite e₁ at h₂,
exact h₂ t rfl e₂
end
end
-/
-- Auxiliary theorem for performing cases-analysis on l₂.
-- We use it to prove perm_inv_core.
private theorem discr₂ {P : Prop} {a b c : A} {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list A} :
a::b::l₁ = l₂++(c::l₃) →
(l₂ = [] → l₃ = b::l₁ → a = c → P) →
(l₂ = [a] → b = c → l₁ = l₃ → P) →
(∀ t, l₂ = a::b::t → l₁ = t++(c::l₃) → P) → P :=
sorry
/-
match l₂ with
| [] := λ e H₁ H₂ H₃,
begin
injection e with a_eq_c b_l₁_eq_l₃,
exact H₁ rfl (eq.symm b_l₁_eq_l₃) a_eq_c
end
| [h₁] := λ e H₁ H₂ H₃,
begin
rewrite [append_cons at e, append_nil_left at e],
injection e with a_eq_h₁ b_eq_c l₁_eq_l₃,
rewrite [a_eq_h₁ at H₂, b_eq_c at H₂, l₁_eq_l₃ at H₂],
exact H₂ rfl rfl rfl
end
| h₁::h₂::t₂ := λ e H₁ H₂ H₃,
begin
injection e with a_eq_h₁ b_eq_h₂ l₁_eq,
rewrite [a_eq_h₁ at H₃, b_eq_h₂ at H₃],
exact H₃ t₂ rfl l₁_eq
end
end
-/
/- permutation inversion -/
theorem perm_inv_core {l₁ l₂ : list A} (p' : l₁ ~ l₂) : ∀ {a s₁ s₂}, l₁≈a|s₁ → l₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂ :=
sorry
/-
perm_induction_on p'
(λ a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
have innil : a ∈ [], from mem_head_of_qeq e₁,
absurd innil !not_mem_nil)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p (r : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₁≈a|s₁ → t₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂) a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
obtain (s₁₁ s₁₂ : list A) (C₁₁ : s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂) (C₁₂ : x::t₁ = s₁₁++(a::s₁₂)), from qeq_split e₁,
obtain (s₂₁ s₂₂ : list A) (C₂₁ : s₂ = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂) (C₂₂ : x::t₂ = s₂₁++(a::s₂₂)), from qeq_split e₂,
discr C₁₂
(λ (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = []) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₁_eq : t₁ = s₁₂),
have s₁_p : s₁ ~ t₂, from calc
s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂ : C₁₁
... = t₁ : by rewrite [-t₁_eq, s₁₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... ~ t₂ : p,
discr C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₂_eq: t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ ~ t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [-t₂_eq, s₂₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
proof calc
s₁ ~ t₂ : s₁_p
... = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂) : t₂_eq
... ~ (a::ts₂₁)++s₂₂ : perm.symm !perm_middle
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [-x_eq_a, -s₂₁_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed))
(λ (ts₁₁ : list A) (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = x::ts₁₁) (t₁_eq : t₁ = ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)),
have t₁_qeq : t₁ ≈ a|(ts₁₁++s₁₂), by rewrite t₁_eq; exact !qeq_app,
have s₁_eq : s₁ = x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂), from calc
s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂ : C₁₁
... = x::(ts₁₁++ s₁₂) : by rewrite s₁₁_eq,
discr C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₂_eq: t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ = a::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite [s₁_eq, x_eq_a]
... ~ ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂) : !perm_middle
... = t₁ : eq.symm t₁_eq
... ~ t₂ : p
... = s₂ : by rewrite [t₂_eq, C₂₁, s₂₁_eq, append_nil_left]
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
have t₂_qeq : t₂ ≈ a|(ts₂₁++s₂₂), by rewrite t₂_eq; exact !qeq_app,
proof calc
s₁ = x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : s₁_eq
... ~ x::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : skip x (r t₁_qeq t₂_qeq)
... = s₂ : by rewrite [-append_cons, -s₂₁_eq, C₂₁]
qed)))
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p (r : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₁≈a|s₁ → t₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂) a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
obtain (s₁₁ s₁₂ : list A) (C₁₁ : s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂) (C₁₂ : y::x::t₁ = s₁₁++(a::s₁₂)), from qeq_split e₁,
obtain (s₂₁ s₂₂ : list A) (C₂₁ : s₂ = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂) (C₂₂ : x::y::t₂ = s₂₁++(a::s₂₂)), from qeq_split e₂,
discr₂ C₁₂
(λ (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = []) (s₁₂_eq : s₁₂ = x::t₁) (y_eq_a : y = a),
have s₁_p : s₁ ~ x::t₂, from calc
s₁ = s₁₁ ++ s₁₂ : C₁₁
... = x::t₁ : by rewrite [s₁₂_eq, s₁₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... ~ x::t₂ : skip x p,
discr₂ C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (s₂₂_eq : s₂₂ = y::t₂) (x_eq_a : x = a),
proof calc
s₁ ~ x::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [x_eq_a, -y_eq_a, -s₂₂_eq, s₂₁_eq, append_nil_left]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = [x]) (y_eq_a : y = a) (t₂_eq : t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ ~ x::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [t₂_eq, s₂₁_eq, append_cons]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::y::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
proof calc
s₁ ~ x::t₂ : s₁_p
... = x::(ts₂₁++(y::s₂₂)) : by rewrite [t₂_eq, -y_eq_a]
... ~ x::y::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : perm.symm (skip x (perm_middle _ _ _)) -- !perm_middle
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, append_cons]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed))
(λ (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = [y]) (x_eq_a : x = a) (t₁_eq : t₁ = s₁₂),
have s₁_p : s₁ ~ y::t₂, from calc
s₁ = y::t₁ : by rewrite [C₁₁, s₁₁_eq, t₁_eq]
... ~ y::t₂ : skip y p,
discr₂ C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (s₂₂_eq : s₂₂ = y::t₂) (x_eq_a : x = a),
proof calc
s₁ ~ y::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, s₂₂_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = [x]) (y_eq_a : y = a) (t₂_eq : t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ ~ y::t₂ : s₁_p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, t₂_eq, y_eq_a, -x_eq_a]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::y::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
proof calc
s₁ ~ y::t₂ : s₁_p
... = y::(ts₂₁++(x::s₂₂)) : by rewrite [t₂_eq, -x_eq_a]
... ~ y::x::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : perm.symm (skip y (perm_middle _ _ _))
... ~ x::y::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : !swap
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed))
(λ (ts₁₁ : list A) (s₁₁_eq : s₁₁ = y::x::ts₁₁) (t₁_eq : t₁ = ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)),
have s₁_eq : s₁ = y::x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂), by rewrite [C₁₁, s₁₁_eq],
discr₂ C₂₂
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = []) (s₂₂_eq : s₂₂ = y::t₂) (x_eq_a : x = a),
proof calc
s₁ = y::a::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite [s₁_eq, x_eq_a]
... ~ y::(ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)) : skip y !perm_middle
... = y::t₁ : by rewrite t₁_eq
... ~ y::t₂ : skip y p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [s₂₁_eq, s₂₂_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = [x]) (y_eq_a : y = a) (t₂_eq : t₂ = s₂₂),
proof calc
s₁ = y::x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite s₁_eq
... ~ x::y::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : !swap
... = x::a::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite y_eq_a
... ~ x::(ts₁₁++(a::s₁₂)) : skip x (perm_middle _ _ _)
... = x::t₁ : by rewrite t₁_eq
... ~ x::t₂ : skip x p
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite [t₂_eq, s₂₁_eq]
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)
(λ (ts₂₁ : list A) (s₂₁_eq : s₂₁ = x::y::ts₂₁) (t₂_eq : t₂ = ts₂₁++(a::s₂₂)),
have t₁_qeq : t₁ ≈ a|(ts₁₁++s₁₂), by rewrite t₁_eq; exact !qeq_app,
have t₂_qeq : t₂ ≈ a|(ts₂₁++s₂₂), by rewrite t₂_eq; exact !qeq_app,
have p_aux : ts₁₁++s₁₂ ~ ts₂₁++s₂₂, from r t₁_qeq t₂_qeq,
proof calc
s₁ = y::x::(ts₁₁++s₁₂) : by rewrite s₁_eq
... ~ y::x::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : skip y (skip x p_aux)
... ~ x::y::(ts₂₁++s₂₂) : !swap
... = s₂₁ ++ s₂₂ : by rewrite s₂₁_eq
... = s₂ : by rewrite C₂₁
qed)))
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂
(r₁ : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₁ ≈ a|s₁ → t₂≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂)
(r₂ : ∀{a s₁ s₂}, t₂ ≈ a|s₁ → t₃≈a|s₂ → s₁ ~ s₂)
a s₁ s₂ e₁ e₂,
have a ∈ t₁, from mem_head_of_qeq e₁,
have a ∈ t₂, from mem_perm p₁ this,
obtain (t₂' : list A) (e₂' : t₂≈a|t₂'), from qeq_of_mem this,
calc s₁ ~ t₂' : r₁ e₁ e₂'
... ~ s₂ : r₂ e₂' e₂)
-/
theorem perm_cons_inv {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} : a::l₁ ~ a::l₂ → l₁ ~ l₂ :=
assume p, perm_inv_core p (qeq.qhead a l₁) (qeq.qhead a l₂)
theorem perm_app_inv {a : A} {l₁ l₂ l₃ l₄ : list A} : l₁++(a::l₂) ~ l₃++(a::l₄) → l₁++l₂ ~ l₃++l₄ :=
assume p : l₁++(a::l₂) ~ l₃++(a::l₄),
have p' : a::(l₁++l₂) ~ a::(l₃++l₄), from calc
a::(l₁++l₂) ~ l₁++(a::l₂) : perm_middle a l₁ l₂
... ~ l₃++(a::l₄) : p
... ~ a::(l₃++l₄) : perm.symm (perm_middle a l₃ l₄),
perm_cons_inv p'
section foldl
variables {f : B → A → B} {l₁ l₂ : list A}
variable rcomm : right_commutative f
include rcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_perm : l₁ ~ l₂ → ∀ b, foldl f b l₁ = foldl f b l₂ :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm_induction_on p
(λ b, by rewrite *foldl_nil)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldl f b (x::t₁) = foldl f (f b x) t₁ : !foldl_cons
... = foldl f (f b x) t₂ : by rewrite (r (f b x))
... = foldl f b (x::t₂) : eq.symm !foldl_cons)
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldl f b (y :: x :: t₁) = foldl f (f (f b y) x) t₁ : by rewrite foldl_cons
... = foldl f (f (f b x) y) t₁ : by rewrite rcomm
... = foldl f (f (f b x) y) t₂ : r (f (f b x) y)
... = foldl f b (x :: y :: t₂) : by rewrite foldl_cons)
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ b, eq.trans (r₁ b) (r₂ b))
-/
end foldl
section foldr
variables {f : A → B → B} {l₁ l₂ : list A}
variable lcomm : left_commutative f
include lcomm
theorem foldr_eq_of_perm : l₁ ~ l₂ → ∀ b, foldr f b l₁ = foldr f b l₂ :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm_induction_on p
(λ b, by rewrite *foldl_nil)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldr f b (x::t₁) = f x (foldr f b t₁) : !foldr_cons
... = f x (foldr f b t₂) : by rewrite [r b]
... = foldr f b (x::t₂) : eq.symm !foldr_cons)
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r b, calc
foldr f b (y :: x :: t₁) = f y (f x (foldr f b t₁)) : by rewrite foldr_cons
... = f x (f y (foldr f b t₁)) : by rewrite lcomm
... = f x (f y (foldr f b t₂)) : by rewrite [r b]
... = foldr f b (x :: y :: t₂) : by rewrite foldr_cons)
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ a, eq.trans (r₁ a) (r₂ a))
-/
end foldr
attribute [congr]
theorem perm_erase_dup_of_perm [H : decidable_eq A] {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → erase_dup l₁ ~ erase_dup l₂ :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm_induction_on p
nil
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
have xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup xint₁)),
by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₂]; exact r)
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁,
have nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from
assume xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup xint₂))) nxint₁,
by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₁]; exact (skip x r)))
(λ y x t₁ t₂ p r, by_cases
(λ xinyt₁ : x ∈ y::t₁, by_cases
(λ yint₁ : y ∈ t₁,
have yint₂ : y ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup yint₁)),
have yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, from or.inr (yint₂),
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xinyt₁)
(λ xeqy : x = y,
have xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, by rewrite [-xeqy at yint₂]; exact yint₂,
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_mem yint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₂],
exact r
end)
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
have xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup xint₁)),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_mem yint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem xint₂],
exact r
end))
(λ nyint₁ : y ∉ t₁,
have nyint₂ : y ∉ t₂, from
assume yint₂ : y ∈ t₂, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup yint₂))) nyint₁,
by_cases
(λ xeqy : x = y,
have nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, by rewrite [-xeqy at nyint₂]; exact nyint₂,
have yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, by rewrite [xeqy]; exact !mem_cons,
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂, xeqy],
exact skip y r
end)
(λ xney : x ≠ y,
have x ∈ t₁, from or_resolve_right xinyt₁ xney,
have x ∈ t₂, from mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup this)),
have y ∉ x::t₂, from
suppose y ∈ x::t₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(λ h, absurd h (ne.symm xney))
(λ h, absurd h nyint₂),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem xinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem `y ∉ x::t₂`,
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem `x ∈ t₂`],
exact skip y r
end)))
(λ nxinyt₁ : x ∉ y::t₁,
have xney : x ≠ y, from ne_of_not_mem_cons nxinyt₁,
have nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_cons nxinyt₁,
have nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from
assume xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup xint₂))) nxint₁,
by_cases
(λ yint₁ : y ∈ t₁,
have yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, from or.inr (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm r (mem_erase_dup yint₁))),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_mem yinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_mem yint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂],
exact skip x r
end)
(λ nyint₁ : y ∉ t₁,
have nyinxt₂ : y ∉ x::t₂, from
assume yinxt₂ : y ∈ x::t₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons yinxt₂)
(λ h, absurd h (ne.symm xney))
(λ h, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup h))) nyint₁),
begin
rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxinyt₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyinxt₂,
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nyint₁, erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nxint₂],
exact xswap x y r
end)))
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
-/
section perm_union
variable [H : decidable_eq A]
include H
theorem perm_union_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (union l₁ t₁) ~ (union l₂ t₁) :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm.induction_on p
(by rewrite [nil_union])
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁, by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ xint₁]; exact r₁)
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, by rewrite [*union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁]; exact (skip _ r₁)))
(λ x y l, by_cases
(λ yint : y ∈ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ xint, *union_cons_of_mem _ yint, *union_cons_of_mem _ xint])
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ yint, *union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, union_cons_of_mem _ yint]))
(λ nyint : y ∉ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_mem _ xint, *union_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint, union_cons_of_mem _ xint])
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, *union_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint, union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint]; exact !swap)))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
-/
theorem perm_union_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list A} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (union l t₁) ~ (union l t₂) :=
sorry
/-
list.induction_on l
(λ p, by rewrite [*union_nil]; exact p)
(λ x xs r p, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
have xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_perm p xint₁,
by rewrite [union_cons_of_mem _ xint₁, union_cons_of_mem _ xint₂]; exact (r p))
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁,
have nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from not_mem_perm p nxint₁,
by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁, union_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₂]; exact (skip _ (r p))))
-/
attribute [congr]
theorem perm_union {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (union l₁ t₁) ~ (union l₂ t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_union_left t₁ p₁) (perm_union_right l₂ p₂)
end perm_union
section perm_insert
variable [H : decidable_eq A]
include H
attribute [congr]
theorem perm_insert (a : A) {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → (insert a l₁) ~ (insert a l₂) :=
sorry
/-
assume p, by_cases
(λ ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁,
have ainl₂ : a ∈ l₂, from mem_perm p ainl₁,
by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem ainl₁, insert_eq_of_mem ainl₂]; exact p)
(λ nainl₁ : a ∉ l₁,
have nainl₂ : a ∉ l₂, from not_mem_perm p nainl₁,
by rewrite [insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl₁, insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl₂]; exact (skip _ p))
-/
end perm_insert
section perm_inter
variable [H : decidable_eq A]
include H
theorem perm_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list A) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (inter l₁ t₁) ~ (inter l₂ t₁) :=
sorry
/-
assume p, perm.induction_on p
!perm.refl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁, by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ xint₁]; exact (skip x r₁))
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁]; exact r₁))
(λ x y l, by_cases
(λ yint : y ∈ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ xint, *inter_cons_of_mem _ yint, *inter_cons_of_mem _ xint];
exact !swap)
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ yint, *inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, inter_cons_of_mem _ yint]))
(λ nyint : y ∉ t₁, by_cases
(λ xint : x ∈ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_mem _ xint, *inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint, inter_cons_of_mem _ xint])
(λ nxint : x ∉ t₁,
by rewrite [*inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint, *inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nyint,
inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint])))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
-/
theorem perm_inter_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list A} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (inter l t₁) ~ (inter l t₂) :=
sorry
/-
list.induction_on l
(λ p, by rewrite [*inter_nil])
(λ x xs r p, by_cases
(λ xint₁ : x ∈ t₁,
have xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, from mem_perm p xint₁,
by rewrite [inter_cons_of_mem _ xint₁, inter_cons_of_mem _ xint₂]; exact (skip _ (r p)))
(λ nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁,
have nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from not_mem_perm p nxint₁,
by rewrite [inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₁, inter_cons_of_not_mem _ nxint₂]; exact (r p)))
-/
attribute [congr]
theorem perm_inter {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (inter l₁ t₁) ~ (inter l₂ t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_inter_left t₁ p₁) (perm_inter_right l₂ p₂)
end perm_inter
/- extensionality -/
section ext
theorem perm_ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ → (∀a, a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂) → l₁ ~ l₂
:= sorry
/-
| [] [] d₁ d₂ e := !perm.nil
| [] (a₂::t₂) d₁ d₂ e := absurd (iff.mpr (e a₂) !mem_cons) (not_mem_nil a₂)
| (a₁::t₁) [] d₁ d₂ e := absurd (iff.mp (e a₁) !mem_cons) (not_mem_nil a₁)
| (a₁::t₁) (a₂::t₂) d₁ d₂ e :=
have a₁ ∈ a₂::t₂, from iff.mp (e a₁) !mem_cons,
have ∃ s₁ s₂, a₂::t₂ = s₁++(a₁::s₂), from mem_split this,
obtain (s₁ s₂ : list A) (t₂_eq : a₂::t₂ = s₁++(a₁::s₂)), from this,
have dt₂' : nodup (a₁::(s₁++s₂)), from nodup_head (by rewrite [t₂_eq at d₂]; exact d₂),
have eqv : ∀a, a ∈ t₁ ↔ a ∈ s₁++s₂, from
take a, iff.intro
(suppose a ∈ t₁,
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from iff.mp (e a) (mem_cons_of_mem _ this),
have a ∈ s₁++(a₁::s₂), by rewrite [t₂_eq at this]; exact this,
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append this)
(suppose a ∈ s₁, mem_append_left s₂ this)
(suppose a ∈ a₁::s₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = a₁,
have a₁ ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁,
by subst a; contradiction)
(suppose a ∈ s₂, mem_append_right s₁ this)))
(suppose a ∈ s₁ ++ s₂, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append this)
(suppose a ∈ s₁,
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_left _ this),
have a ∈ a₁::t₁, from iff.mpr (e a) this,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = a₁,
have a₁ ∉ s₁++s₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
have a₁ ∉ s₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left this,
by subst a; contradiction)
(suppose a ∈ t₁, this))
(suppose a ∈ s₂,
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_right _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ this)),
have a ∈ a₁::t₁, from iff.mpr (e a) this,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = a₁,
have a₁ ∉ s₁++s₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
have a₁ ∉ s₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right this,
by subst a; contradiction)
(suppose a ∈ t₁, this))),
have ds₁s₂ : nodup (s₁++s₂), from nodup_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
have nodup t₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons d₁,
calc a₁::t₁ ~ a₁::(s₁++s₂) : skip a₁ (perm_ext this ds₁s₂ eqv)
... ~ s₁++(a₁::s₂) : !perm_middle
... = a₂::t₂ : by rewrite t₂_eq
-/
end ext
theorem nodup_of_perm_of_nodup {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ :=
sorry
/-
assume h, perm.induction_on h
(λ h, h)
(λ a l₁ l₂ p ih nd,
have nodup l₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons nd,
have nodup l₂, from ih this,
have a ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons nd,
have a ∉ l₂, from suppose a ∈ l₂, absurd (mem_perm (perm.symm p) this) `a ∉ l₁`,
nodup_cons `a ∉ l₂` `nodup l₂`)
(λ x y l₁ nd,
have nodup (x::l₁), from nodup_of_nodup_cons nd,
have nodup l₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons this,
have x ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons `nodup (x::l₁)`,
have y ∉ x::l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons nd,
have x ≠ y, from suppose x = y, begin subst x, exact absurd !mem_cons `y ∉ y::l₁` end,
have y ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_cons `y ∉ x::l₁`,
have x ∉ y::l₁, from not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem `x ≠ y` `x ∉ l₁`,
have nodup (y::l₁), from nodup_cons `y ∉ l₁` `nodup l₁`,
show nodup (x::y::l₁), from nodup_cons `x ∉ y::l₁` `nodup (y::l₁)`)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ ih₁ ih₂ nd, ih₂ (ih₁ nd))
-/
/- product -/
section product
theorem perm_product_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} (t₁ : list B) : l₁ ~ l₂ → (product l₁ t₁) ~ (product l₂ t₁) :=
sorry
/-
assume p : l₁ ~ l₂, perm.induction_on p
!perm.refl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, perm_app (perm.refl (map _ t₁)) r)
(λ x y l,
let m₁ := map (λ b, (x, b)) t₁ in
let m₂ := map (λ b, (y, b)) t₁ in
let c := product l t₁ in
calc m₂ ++ (m₁ ++ c) = (m₂ ++ m₁) ++ c : by rewrite append.assoc
... ~ (m₁ ++ m₂) ++ c : perm_app !perm_app_comm !perm.refl
... = m₁ ++ (m₂ ++ c) : by rewrite append.assoc)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
-/
theorem perm_product_right (l : list A) {t₁ t₂ : list B} : t₁ ~ t₂ → (product l t₁) ~ (product l t₂) :=
sorry
/-
list.induction_on l
(λ p, by rewrite [*nil_product])
(λ a t r p,
perm_app (perm_map _ p) (r p))
-/
attribute [congr]
theorem perm_product {l₁ l₂ : list A} {t₁ t₂ : list B} : l₁ ~ l₂ → t₁ ~ t₂ → (product l₁ t₁) ~ (product l₂ t₂) :=
assume p₁ p₂, trans (perm_product_left t₁ p₁) (perm_product_right l₂ p₂)
end product
/- filter -/
attribute [congr]
theorem perm_filter {l₁ l₂ : list A} {p : A → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
l₁ ~ l₂ → (filter p l₁) ~ (filter p l₂) :=
sorry
/-
assume u, perm.induction_on u
perm.nil
(take x l₁' l₂',
assume u' : l₁' ~ l₂',
assume u'' : filter p l₁' ~ filter p l₂',
decidable.by_cases
(suppose p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_pos _ this]; apply perm.skip; apply u'')
(suppose ¬ p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_neg _ this]; apply u''))
(take x y l,
decidable.by_cases
(assume H1 : p x,
decidable.by_cases
(assume H2 : p y,
begin
rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ H1, *filter_cons_of_pos _ H2, filter_cons_of_pos _ H1],
apply perm.swap
end)
(assume H2 : ¬ p y,
by rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ H1, *filter_cons_of_neg _ H2, filter_cons_of_pos _ H1]))
(assume H1 : ¬ p x,
decidable.by_cases
(assume H2 : p y,
by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ H1, *filter_cons_of_pos _ H2, filter_cons_of_neg _ H1])
(assume H2 : ¬ p y,
by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ H1, *filter_cons_of_neg _ H2, filter_cons_of_neg _ H1])))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
-/
section count
variable [decA : decidable_eq A]
include decA
theorem count_eq_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list A} : l₁ ~ l₂ → ∀ a, count a l₁ = count a l₂ :=
sorry
/-
suppose l₁ ~ l₂, perm.induction_on this
(λ a, rfl)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p h a, by rewrite [*count_cons, *h a])
(λ x y l a, by_cases
(suppose a = x, by_cases
(suppose a = y, begin subst x, subst y end)
(suppose a ≠ y, begin subst x, rewrite [count_cons_of_ne this, *count_cons_eq, count_cons_of_ne this] end))
(suppose a ≠ x, by_cases
(suppose a = y, begin subst y, rewrite [count_cons_of_ne this, *count_cons_eq, count_cons_of_ne this] end)
(suppose a ≠ y, begin rewrite [count_cons_of_ne `a≠x`, *count_cons_of_ne `a≠y`, count_cons_of_ne `a≠x`] end)))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ h₁ h₂ a, eq.trans (h₁ a) (h₂ a))
-/
end count
end perm
|
2d1970a634711725befbf403dc1cc69901326598 | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/field_theory/splitting_field.lean | facc9f4764d6493723e950d1cef8b3ab5269c2a6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,465 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
Definition of splitting fields, and definition of homomorphism into any field that splits
-/
import ring_theory.adjoin_root
import ring_theory.algebra_tower
import ring_theory.algebraic
import ring_theory.polynomial
import field_theory.minpoly
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import tactic.field_simp
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace polynomial
variables [field α] [field β] [field γ]
open polynomial
section splits
variables (i : α →+* β)
/-- a polynomial `splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1 -/
def splits (f : polynomial α) : Prop :=
f = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : polynomial β}, irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
@[simp] lemma splits_zero : splits i (0 : polynomial α) := or.inl rfl
@[simp] lemma splits_C (a : α) : splits i (C a) :=
if ha : a = 0 then ha.symm ▸ (@C_0 α _).symm ▸ splits_zero i
else
have hia : i a ≠ 0, from mt ((is_add_group_hom.injective_iff i).1
i.injective _) ha,
or.inr $ λ g hg ⟨p, hp⟩, absurd hg.1 (not_not.2 (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 $
by have := congr_arg degree hp;
simp [degree_C hia, @eq_comm (with_bot ℕ) 0,
nat.with_bot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this; clear _fun_match; tauto))
lemma splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : polynomial α} (hf : degree f = 1) : splits i f :=
or.inr $ λ g hg ⟨p, hp⟩,
by have := congr_arg degree hp;
simp [nat.with_bot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (with_bot ℕ) 1,
mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this;
clear _fun_match; tauto
lemma splits_of_degree_le_one {f : polynomial α} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : splits i f :=
begin
cases h : degree f with n,
{ rw [degree_eq_bot.1 h]; exact splits_zero i },
{ cases n with n,
{ rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (trans_rel_right (≤) h (le_refl _))];
exact splits_C _ _ },
{ have hn : n = 0,
{ rw h at hf,
cases n, { refl }, { exact absurd hf dec_trivial } },
exact splits_of_degree_eq_one _ (by rw [h, hn]; refl) } }
end
lemma splits_mul {f g : polynomial α} (hf : splits i f) (hg : splits i g) : splits i (f * g) :=
if h : f * g = 0 then by simp [h]
else or.inr $ λ p hp hpf, ((principal_ideal_ring.irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g, by convert hpf; rw polynomial.map_mul)).elim
(hf.resolve_left (λ hf, by simpa [hf] using h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (λ hg, by simpa [hg] using h) hp)
lemma splits_of_splits_mul {f g : polynomial α} (hfg : f * g ≠ 0) (h : splits i (f * g)) :
splits i f ∧ splits i g :=
⟨or.inr $ λ g hgi hg, or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw map_mul; exact dvd.trans hg (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
or.inr $ λ g hgi hg, or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw map_mul; exact dvd.trans hg (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
lemma splits_of_splits_of_dvd {f g : polynomial α} (hf0 : f ≠ 0) (hf : splits i f) (hgf : g ∣ f) :
splits i g :=
by { obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := hgf, exact (splits_of_splits_mul i hf0 hf).1 }
lemma splits_of_splits_gcd_left {f g : polynomial α} (hf0 : f ≠ 0) (hf : splits i f) :
splits i (euclidean_domain.gcd f g) :=
polynomial.splits_of_splits_of_dvd i hf0 hf (euclidean_domain.gcd_dvd_left f g)
lemma splits_of_splits_gcd_right {f g : polynomial α} (hg0 : g ≠ 0) (hg : splits i g) :
splits i (euclidean_domain.gcd f g) :=
polynomial.splits_of_splits_of_dvd i hg0 hg (euclidean_domain.gcd_dvd_right f g)
lemma splits_map_iff (j : β →+* γ) {f : polynomial α} :
splits j (f.map i) ↔ splits (j.comp i) f :=
by simp [splits, polynomial.map_map]
theorem splits_one : splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
theorem splits_of_is_unit {u : polynomial α} (hu : is_unit u) : u.splits i :=
splits_of_splits_of_dvd i one_ne_zero (splits_one _) $ is_unit_iff_dvd_one.1 hu
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : α} : (X - C x).splits i :=
splits_of_degree_eq_one _ $ degree_X_sub_C x
theorem splits_X : X.splits i :=
splits_of_degree_eq_one _ $ degree_X
theorem splits_id_iff_splits {f : polynomial α} :
(f.map i).splits (ring_hom.id β) ↔ f.splits i :=
by rw [splits_map_iff, ring_hom.id_comp]
theorem splits_mul_iff {f g : polynomial α} (hf : f ≠ 0) (hg : g ≠ 0) :
(f * g).splits i ↔ f.splits i ∧ g.splits i :=
⟨splits_of_splits_mul i (mul_ne_zero hf hg), λ ⟨hfs, hgs⟩, splits_mul i hfs hgs⟩
theorem splits_prod {ι : Type w} {s : ι → polynomial α} {t : finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).splits i) → (∏ x in t, s x).splits i :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on t (λ _, splits_one i) (λ a t hat ih ht, _),
rw finset.forall_mem_insert at ht, rw finset.prod_insert hat,
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
end
theorem splits_prod_iff {ι : Type w} {s : ι → polynomial α} {t : finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, s j ≠ 0) → ((∏ x in t, s x).splits i ↔ ∀ j ∈ t, (s j).splits i) :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on t (λ _, ⟨λ _ _ h, h.elim, λ _, splits_one i⟩) (λ a t hat ih ht, _),
rw finset.forall_mem_insert at ht ⊢,
rw [finset.prod_insert hat, splits_mul_iff i ht.1 (finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 ht.2), ih ht.2]
end
lemma degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_splits {p : polynomial β}
(h_nz : p ≠ 0) (hp : irreducible p) (hp_splits : splits (ring_hom.id β) p) :
p.degree = 1 :=
begin
rcases hp_splits,
{ contradiction },
{ apply hp_splits hp, simp }
end
lemma exists_root_of_splits {f : polynomial α} (hs : splits i f) (hf0 : degree f ≠ 0) :
∃ x, eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then ⟨37, by simp [hf0]⟩
else
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := wf_dvd_monoid.exists_irreducible_factor
(show ¬ is_unit (f.map i), from mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 (by rwa degree_map))
(map_ne_zero hf0) in
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (hs.resolve_left hf0 hg.1 hg.2) in
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg.2 in
⟨x, by rw [← eval_map, hi, eval_mul, show _ = _, from hx, zero_mul]⟩
lemma exists_multiset_of_splits {f : polynomial α} : splits i f →
∃ (s : multiset β), f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) *
(s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod :=
suffices splits (ring_hom.id _) (f.map i) → ∃ s : multiset β, f.map i =
(C (f.map i).leading_coeff) * (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod,
by rwa [splits_map_iff, leading_coeff_map i] at this,
wf_dvd_monoid.induction_on_irreducible (f.map i)
(λ _, ⟨{37}, by simp [i.map_zero]⟩)
(λ u hu _, ⟨0,
by conv_lhs { rw eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu) };
simp [leading_coeff, nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu)]⟩)
(λ f p hf0 hp ih hfs,
have hpf0 : p * f ≠ 0, from mul_ne_zero hp.ne_zero hf0,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := ih (splits_of_splits_mul _ hpf0 hfs).2 in
⟨-(p * norm_unit p).coeff 0 ::ₘ s,
have hp1 : degree p = 1, from hfs.resolve_left hpf0 hp (by simp),
begin
rw [multiset.map_cons, multiset.prod_cons, leading_coeff_mul, C_mul, mul_assoc,
mul_left_comm (C f.leading_coeff), ← hs, ← mul_assoc, mul_left_inj' hf0],
conv_lhs {rw eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hp1},
simp only [mul_add, coe_norm_unit_of_ne_zero hp.ne_zero, mul_comm p, coeff_neg,
C_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg, coeff_C_mul, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, C_mul.symm,
mul_inv_cancel (show p.leading_coeff ≠ 0, from mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1
hp.ne_zero), one_mul],
end⟩)
/-- Pick a root of a polynomial that splits. -/
def root_of_splits {f : polynomial α} (hf : f.splits i) (hfd : f.degree ≠ 0) : β :=
classical.some $ exists_root_of_splits i hf hfd
theorem map_root_of_splits {f : polynomial α} (hf : f.splits i) (hfd) :
f.eval₂ i (root_of_splits i hf hfd) = 0 :=
classical.some_spec $ exists_root_of_splits i hf hfd
theorem roots_map {f : polynomial α} (hf : f.splits $ ring_hom.id α) :
(f.map i).roots = (f.roots).map i :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then by rw [hf0, map_zero, roots_zero, roots_zero, multiset.map_zero] else
have hmf0 : f.map i ≠ 0 := map_ne_zero hf0,
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_multiset_of_splits _ hf in
have h1 : ∀ p ∈ m.map (λ r, X - C r), (p : _) ≠ 0,
from multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.2 $ λ _ _, X_sub_C_ne_zero _,
have h2 : ∀ p ∈ m.map (λ r, X - C (i r)), (p : _) ≠ 0,
from multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.2 $ λ _ _, X_sub_C_ne_zero _,
begin
rw map_id at hm, rw hm at hf0 hmf0 ⊢, rw map_mul at hmf0 ⊢,
rw [roots_mul hf0, roots_mul hmf0, map_C, roots_C, zero_add, roots_C, zero_add,
map_multiset_prod, multiset.map_map], simp_rw [(∘), map_sub, map_X, map_C],
rw [roots_multiset_prod _ h2, multiset.bind_map,
roots_multiset_prod _ h1, multiset.bind_map],
simp_rw roots_X_sub_C,
rw [multiset.bind_cons, multiset.bind_zero, add_zero,
multiset.bind_cons, multiset.bind_zero, add_zero, multiset.map_id']
end
lemma eq_prod_roots_of_splits {p : polynomial α} {i : α →+* β}
(hsplit : splits i p) :
p.map i = C (i p.leading_coeff) * ((p.map i).roots.map (λ a, X - C a)).prod :=
begin
by_cases p_eq_zero : p = 0,
{ rw [p_eq_zero, map_zero, leading_coeff_zero, i.map_zero, C.map_zero, zero_mul] },
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_multiset_of_splits i hsplit,
have map_ne_zero : p.map i ≠ 0 := map_ne_zero (p_eq_zero),
have prod_ne_zero : C (i p.leading_coeff) * (multiset.map (λ a, X - C a) s).prod ≠ 0 :=
by rwa hs at map_ne_zero,
have ne_zero_of_mem : ∀ (p : polynomial β), p ∈ s.map (λ a, X - C a) → p ≠ 0,
{ intros p mem,
obtain ⟨a, _, rfl⟩ := multiset.mem_map.mp mem,
apply X_sub_C_ne_zero },
have map_bind_roots_eq : (s.map (λ a, X - C a)).bind (λ a, a.roots) = s,
{ refine multiset.induction_on s (by rw [multiset.map_zero, multiset.zero_bind]) _,
intros a s ih,
rw [multiset.map_cons, multiset.cons_bind, ih, roots_X_sub_C,
multiset.cons_add, zero_add] },
rw [hs, roots_mul prod_ne_zero, roots_C, zero_add,
roots_multiset_prod _ ne_zero_of_mem,
map_bind_roots_eq]
end
lemma eq_X_sub_C_of_splits_of_single_root {x : α} {h : polynomial α} (h_splits : splits i h)
(h_roots : (h.map i).roots = {i x}) : h = (C (leading_coeff h)) * (X - C x) :=
begin
apply polynomial.map_injective _ i.injective,
rw [eq_prod_roots_of_splits h_splits, h_roots],
simp,
end
lemma nat_degree_multiset_prod {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] {s : multiset (polynomial R)}
(h : ∀ p ∈ s, p ≠ (0 : polynomial R)) :
nat_degree s.prod = (s.map nat_degree).sum :=
begin
revert h,
refine s.induction_on _ _,
{ simp },
intros p s ih h,
have hs : ∀ p ∈ s, p ≠ (0 : polynomial R) := λ p hp, h p (multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hp),
have hprod : s.prod ≠ 0 := multiset.prod_ne_zero (λ p hp, hs p hp),
rw [multiset.prod_cons, nat_degree_mul (h p (multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)) hprod, ih hs,
multiset.map_cons, multiset.sum_cons],
end
lemma nat_degree_eq_card_roots {p : polynomial α} {i : α →+* β}
(hsplit : splits i p) : p.nat_degree = (p.map i).roots.card :=
begin
by_cases p_eq_zero : p = 0,
{ rw [p_eq_zero, nat_degree_zero, map_zero, roots_zero, multiset.card_zero] },
have map_ne_zero : p.map i ≠ 0 := map_ne_zero (p_eq_zero),
rw eq_prod_roots_of_splits hsplit at map_ne_zero,
conv_lhs { rw [← nat_degree_map i, eq_prod_roots_of_splits hsplit] },
have : ∀ p' ∈ (map i p).roots.map (λ a, X - C a), p' ≠ (0 : polynomial β),
{ intros p hp,
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := multiset.mem_map.mp hp,
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero _ },
simp [nat_degree_mul (left_ne_zero_of_mul map_ne_zero) (right_ne_zero_of_mul map_ne_zero),
nat_degree_multiset_prod this]
end
lemma degree_eq_card_roots {p : polynomial α} {i : α →+* β} (p_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hsplit : splits i p) : p.degree = (p.map i).roots.card :=
by rw [degree_eq_nat_degree p_ne_zero, nat_degree_eq_card_roots hsplit]
section UFD
local attribute [instance, priority 10] principal_ideal_ring.to_unique_factorization_monoid
local infix ` ~ᵤ ` : 50 := associated
open unique_factorization_monoid associates
lemma splits_of_exists_multiset {f : polynomial α} {s : multiset β}
(hs : f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) * (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod) :
splits i f :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then or.inl hf0
else
or.inr $ λ p hp hdp,
have ht : multiset.rel associated
(factors (f.map i)) (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)) :=
factors_unique
(λ p hp, irreducible_of_factor _ hp)
(λ p' m, begin
obtain ⟨a,m,rfl⟩ := multiset.mem_map.1 m,
exact irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (degree_X_sub_C _),
end)
(associated.symm $ calc _ ~ᵤ f.map i :
⟨(units.map' C : units β →* units (polynomial β)) (units.mk0 (f.map i).leading_coeff
(mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 (map_ne_zero hf0))),
by conv_rhs {rw [hs, ← leading_coeff_map i, mul_comm]}; refl⟩
... ~ᵤ _ : associated.symm (unique_factorization_monoid.factors_prod (by simpa using hf0))),
let ⟨q, hq, hpq⟩ := exists_mem_factors_of_dvd (by simpa) hp hdp in
let ⟨q', hq', hqq'⟩ := multiset.exists_mem_of_rel_of_mem ht hq in
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := multiset.mem_map.1 hq' in
by rw [← degree_X_sub_C a, ha.2];
exact degree_eq_degree_of_associated (hpq.trans hqq')
lemma splits_of_splits_id {f : polynomial α} : splits (ring_hom.id _) f → splits i f :=
unique_factorization_monoid.induction_on_prime f (λ _, splits_zero _)
(λ _ hu _, splits_of_degree_le_one _
((is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu).symm ▸ dec_trivial))
(λ a p ha0 hp ih hfi, splits_mul _
(splits_of_degree_eq_one _
((splits_of_splits_mul _ (mul_ne_zero hp.1 ha0) hfi).1.resolve_left
hp.1 (irreducible_of_prime hp) (by rw map_id)))
(ih (splits_of_splits_mul _ (mul_ne_zero hp.1 ha0) hfi).2))
end UFD
lemma splits_iff_exists_multiset {f : polynomial α} : splits i f ↔
∃ (s : multiset β), f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) *
(s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod :=
⟨exists_multiset_of_splits i, λ ⟨s, hs⟩, splits_of_exists_multiset i hs⟩
lemma splits_comp_of_splits (j : β →+* γ) {f : polynomial α}
(h : splits i f) : splits (j.comp i) f :=
begin
change i with ((ring_hom.id _).comp i) at h,
rw [← splits_map_iff],
rw [← splits_map_iff i] at h,
exact splits_of_splits_id _ h
end
/-- A monic polynomial `p` that has as much roots as its degree
can be written `p = ∏(X - a)`, for `a` in `p.roots`. -/
lemma prod_multiset_X_sub_C_of_monic_of_roots_card_eq {p : polynomial α}
(hmonic : p.monic) (hroots : p.roots.card = p.nat_degree) :
(multiset.map (λ (a : α), X - C a) p.roots).prod = p :=
begin
have hprodmonic : (multiset.map (λ (a : α), X - C a) p.roots).prod.monic,
{ simp only [prod_multiset_root_eq_finset_root (ne_zero_of_monic hmonic),
monic_prod_of_monic, monic_X_sub_C, monic_pow, forall_true_iff] },
have hdegree : (multiset.map (λ (a : α), X - C a) p.roots).prod.nat_degree = p.nat_degree,
{ rw [← hroots, nat_degree_multiset_prod],
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, mul_one, nat.cast_id, nsmul_eq_mul, multiset.sum_repeat,
multiset.map_const,nat_degree_X_sub_C, function.comp, multiset.map_map],
intros x y,
simp only [multiset.mem_map] at y,
rcases y with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a },
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := prod_multiset_X_sub_C_dvd p,
have qzero : q ≠ 0,
{ rintro rfl, apply hmonic.ne_zero, simpa only [mul_zero] using hq },
have degp :
p.nat_degree = (multiset.map (λ (a : α), X - C a) p.roots).prod.nat_degree + q.nat_degree,
{ nth_rewrite 0 [hq],
simp only [nat_degree_mul (ne_zero_of_monic hprodmonic) qzero] },
have degq : q.nat_degree = 0,
{ rw hdegree at degp,
exact (add_right_inj p.nat_degree).mp (tactic.ring_exp.add_pf_sum_z degp rfl).symm },
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 ((degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq qzero).2 degq),
have hassoc : associated (multiset.map (λ (a : α), X - C a) p.roots).prod p,
{ rw associated, use u, rw [hu, ← hq] },
exact eq_of_monic_of_associated hprodmonic hmonic hassoc
end
/-- A polynomial `p` that has as much roots as its degree
can be written `p = p.leading_coeff * ∏(X - a)`, for `a` in `p.roots`. -/
lemma C_leading_coeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C {p : polynomial α}
(hroots : p.roots.card = p.nat_degree) :
(C p.leading_coeff) * (multiset.map (λ (a : α), X - C a) p.roots).prod = p :=
begin
by_cases hzero : p = 0,
{ rw [hzero, leading_coeff_zero, ring_hom.map_zero, zero_mul], },
{ have hcoeff : p.leading_coeff ≠ 0,
{ intro h, exact hzero (leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 h) },
have hrootsnorm : (normalize p).roots.card = (normalize p).nat_degree,
{ rw [roots_normalize, normalize_apply, nat_degree_mul hzero (units.ne_zero _), hroots, coe_norm_unit,
nat_degree_C, add_zero], },
have hprod := prod_multiset_X_sub_C_of_monic_of_roots_card_eq (monic_normalize hzero) hrootsnorm,
rw [roots_normalize, normalize_apply, coe_norm_unit_of_ne_zero hzero] at hprod,
calc (C p.leading_coeff) * (multiset.map (λ (a : α), X - C a) p.roots).prod
= p * C ((p.leading_coeff)⁻¹ * p.leading_coeff) : by rw [hprod, mul_comm, mul_assoc, ← C_mul]
... = p * C 1 : by field_simp
... = p : by simp only [mul_one, ring_hom.map_one], },
end
/-- A polynomial splits if and only if it has as much roots as its degree. -/
lemma splits_iff_card_roots {p : polynomial α} :
splits (ring_hom.id α) p ↔ p.roots.card = p.nat_degree :=
begin
split,
{ intro H, rw [nat_degree_eq_card_roots H, map_id] },
{ intro hroots,
apply (splits_iff_exists_multiset (ring_hom.id α)).2,
use p.roots,
simp only [ring_hom.id_apply, map_id],
exact (C_leading_coeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C hroots).symm },
end
end splits
end polynomial
section embeddings
variables (F : Type*) [field F]
/-- If `p` is the minimal polynomial of `a` over `F` then `F[a] ≃ₐ[F] F[x]/(p)` -/
def alg_equiv.adjoin_singleton_equiv_adjoin_root_minpoly
{R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [algebra F R] (x : R) :
algebra.adjoin F ({x} : set R) ≃ₐ[F] adjoin_root (minpoly F x) :=
alg_equiv.symm $ alg_equiv.of_bijective
(alg_hom.cod_restrict
(adjoin_root.lift_hom _ x $ minpoly.aeval F x) _
(λ p, adjoin_root.induction_on _ p $ λ p,
(algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range F x).symm ▸ (polynomial.aeval _).mem_range.mpr ⟨p, rfl⟩))
⟨(alg_hom.injective_cod_restrict _ _ _).2 $ (alg_hom.injective_iff _).2 $ λ p,
adjoin_root.induction_on _ p $ λ p hp, ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 $
ideal.mem_span_singleton.2 $ minpoly.dvd F x hp,
λ y, let ⟨p, _, hp⟩ := (subalgebra.ext_iff.1 (algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range F x) y).1 y.2 in
⟨adjoin_root.mk _ p, subtype.eq hp⟩⟩
open finset
-- Speed up the following proof.
local attribute [irreducible] minpoly
-- TODO: Why is this so slow?
/-- If `K` and `L` are field extensions of `F` and we have `s : finset K` such that
the minimal polynomial of each `x ∈ s` splits in `L` then `algebra.adjoin F s` embeds in `L`. -/
theorem lift_of_splits {F K L : Type*} [field F] [field K] [field L]
[algebra F K] [algebra F L] (s : finset K) :
(∀ x ∈ s, is_integral F x ∧ polynomial.splits (algebra_map F L) (minpoly F x)) →
nonempty (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K) →ₐ[F] L) :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on s (λ H, _) (λ a s has ih H, _),
{ rw [coe_empty, algebra.adjoin_empty],
exact ⟨(algebra.of_id F L).comp (algebra.bot_equiv F K)⟩ },
rw forall_mem_insert at H, rcases H with ⟨⟨H1, H2⟩, H3⟩, cases ih H3 with f,
choose H3 H4 using H3,
rw [coe_insert, set.insert_eq, set.union_comm, algebra.adjoin_union],
letI := (f : algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K) →+* L).to_algebra,
haveI : finite_dimensional F (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K)) :=
(submodule.fg_iff_finite_dimensional _).1 (fg_adjoin_of_finite (set.finite_mem_finset s) H3),
letI := field_of_finite_dimensional F (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K)),
have H5 : is_integral (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K)) a := is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower a H1,
have H6 : (minpoly (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K)) a).splits
(algebra_map (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K)) L),
{ refine polynomial.splits_of_splits_of_dvd _
(polynomial.map_ne_zero $ minpoly.ne_zero H1 :
polynomial.map (algebra_map _ _) _ ≠ 0)
((polynomial.splits_map_iff _ _).2 _)
(minpoly.dvd _ _ _),
{ rw ← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq, exact H2 },
{ rw [← is_scalar_tower.aeval_apply, minpoly.aeval] } },
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := polynomial.exists_root_of_splits _ H6 (ne_of_lt (minpoly.degree_pos H5)).symm,
refine ⟨subalgebra.of_under _ _ _⟩,
refine (adjoin_root.lift_hom (minpoly (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K)) a) y hy).comp _,
exact alg_equiv.adjoin_singleton_equiv_adjoin_root_minpoly (algebra.adjoin F (↑s : set K)) a
end
end embeddings
namespace polynomial
variables [field α] [field β] [field γ]
open polynomial
section splitting_field
/-- Non-computably choose an irreducible factor from a polynomial. -/
def factor (f : polynomial α) : polynomial α :=
if H : ∃ g, irreducible g ∧ g ∣ f then classical.some H else X
instance irreducible_factor (f : polynomial α) : irreducible (factor f) :=
begin
rw factor, split_ifs with H, { exact (classical.some_spec H).1 }, { exact irreducible_X }
end
theorem factor_dvd_of_not_is_unit {f : polynomial α} (hf1 : ¬is_unit f) : factor f ∣ f :=
begin
by_cases hf2 : f = 0, { rw hf2, exact dvd_zero _ },
rw [factor, dif_pos (wf_dvd_monoid.exists_irreducible_factor hf1 hf2)],
exact (classical.some_spec $ wf_dvd_monoid.exists_irreducible_factor hf1 hf2).2
end
theorem factor_dvd_of_degree_ne_zero {f : polynomial α} (hf : f.degree ≠ 0) : factor f ∣ f :=
factor_dvd_of_not_is_unit (mt degree_eq_zero_of_is_unit hf)
theorem factor_dvd_of_nat_degree_ne_zero {f : polynomial α} (hf : f.nat_degree ≠ 0) : factor f ∣ f :=
factor_dvd_of_degree_ne_zero (mt nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hf)
/-- Divide a polynomial f by X - C r where r is a root of f in a bigger field extension. -/
def remove_factor (f : polynomial α) : polynomial (adjoin_root $ factor f) :=
map (adjoin_root.of f.factor) f /ₘ (X - C (adjoin_root.root f.factor))
theorem X_sub_C_mul_remove_factor (f : polynomial α) (hf : f.nat_degree ≠ 0) :
(X - C (adjoin_root.root f.factor)) * f.remove_factor = map (adjoin_root.of f.factor) f :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := factor_dvd_of_nat_degree_ne_zero hf in
mul_div_by_monic_eq_iff_is_root.2 $ by rw [is_root.def, eval_map, hg, eval₂_mul, ← hg,
adjoin_root.eval₂_root, zero_mul]
theorem nat_degree_remove_factor (f : polynomial α) :
f.remove_factor.nat_degree = f.nat_degree - 1 :=
by rw [remove_factor, nat_degree_div_by_monic _ (monic_X_sub_C _), nat_degree_map, nat_degree_X_sub_C]
theorem nat_degree_remove_factor' {f : polynomial α} {n : ℕ} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n+1) :
f.remove_factor.nat_degree = n :=
by rw [nat_degree_remove_factor, hfn, n.add_sub_cancel]
/-- Auxiliary construction to a splitting field of a polynomial. Uses induction on the degree. -/
def splitting_field_aux (n : ℕ) : Π {α : Type u} [field α], by exactI Π (f : polynomial α),
f.nat_degree = n → Type u :=
nat.rec_on n (λ α _ _ _, α) $ λ n ih α _ f hf, by exactI
ih f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hf)
namespace splitting_field_aux
theorem succ (n : ℕ) (f : polynomial α) (hfn : f.nat_degree = n + 1) :
splitting_field_aux (n+1) f hfn =
splitting_field_aux n f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hfn) := rfl
instance field (n : ℕ) : Π {α : Type u} [field α], by exactI
Π {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n), field (splitting_field_aux n f hfn) :=
nat.rec_on n (λ α _ _ _, ‹field α›) $ λ n ih α _ f hf, ih _
instance inhabited {n : ℕ} {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n) :
inhabited (splitting_field_aux n f hfn) := ⟨37⟩
instance algebra (n : ℕ) : Π {α : Type u} [field α], by exactI
Π {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n), algebra α (splitting_field_aux n f hfn) :=
nat.rec_on n (λ α _ _ _, by exactI algebra.id α) $ λ n ih α _ f hfn,
by exactI @@algebra.comap.algebra _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (ih _)
instance algebra' {n : ℕ} {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n + 1) :
algebra (adjoin_root f.factor) (splitting_field_aux _ _ hfn) :=
splitting_field_aux.algebra n _
instance algebra'' {n : ℕ} {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n + 1) :
algebra α (splitting_field_aux n f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hfn)) :=
splitting_field_aux.algebra (n+1) hfn
instance algebra''' {n : ℕ} {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n + 1) :
algebra (adjoin_root f.factor)
(splitting_field_aux n f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hfn)) :=
splitting_field_aux.algebra n _
instance scalar_tower {n : ℕ} {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n + 1) :
is_scalar_tower α (adjoin_root f.factor) (splitting_field_aux _ _ hfn) :=
is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, rfl
instance scalar_tower' {n : ℕ} {f : polynomial α} (hfn : f.nat_degree = n + 1) :
is_scalar_tower α (adjoin_root f.factor)
(splitting_field_aux n f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hfn)) :=
is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, rfl
theorem algebra_map_succ (n : ℕ) (f : polynomial α) (hfn : f.nat_degree = n + 1) :
by exact algebra_map α (splitting_field_aux _ _ hfn) =
(algebra_map (adjoin_root f.factor)
(splitting_field_aux n f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hfn))).comp
(adjoin_root.of f.factor) :=
rfl
protected theorem splits (n : ℕ) : ∀ {α : Type u} [field α], by exactI
∀ (f : polynomial α) (hfn : f.nat_degree = n),
splits (algebra_map α $ splitting_field_aux n f hfn) f :=
nat.rec_on n (λ α _ _ hf, by exactI splits_of_degree_le_one _
(le_trans degree_le_nat_degree $ hf.symm ▸ with_bot.coe_le_coe.2 zero_le_one)) $ λ n ih α _ f hf,
by { resetI, rw [← splits_id_iff_splits, algebra_map_succ, ← map_map, splits_id_iff_splits,
← X_sub_C_mul_remove_factor f (λ h, by { rw h at hf, cases hf })],
exact splits_mul _ (splits_X_sub_C _) (ih _ _) }
theorem exists_lift (n : ℕ) : ∀ {α : Type u} [field α], by exactI
∀ (f : polynomial α) (hfn : f.nat_degree = n) {β : Type*} [field β], by exactI
∀ (j : α →+* β) (hf : splits j f), ∃ k : splitting_field_aux n f hfn →+* β,
k.comp (algebra_map _ _) = j :=
nat.rec_on n (λ α _ _ _ β _ j _, by exactI ⟨j, j.comp_id⟩) $ λ n ih α _ f hf β _ j hj, by exactI
have hndf : f.nat_degree ≠ 0, by { intro h, rw h at hf, cases hf },
have hfn0 : f ≠ 0, by { intro h, rw h at hndf, exact hndf rfl },
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_root_of_splits _ (splits_of_splits_of_dvd j hfn0 hj
(factor_dvd_of_nat_degree_ne_zero hndf)) (mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 f.irreducible_factor.1) in
have hmf0 : map (adjoin_root.of f.factor) f ≠ 0, from map_ne_zero hfn0,
have hsf : splits (adjoin_root.lift j r hr) f.remove_factor,
by { rw ← X_sub_C_mul_remove_factor _ hndf at hmf0, refine (splits_of_splits_mul _ hmf0 _).2,
rwa [X_sub_C_mul_remove_factor _ hndf, ← splits_id_iff_splits, map_map, adjoin_root.lift_comp_of,
splits_id_iff_splits] },
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := ih f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hf) (adjoin_root.lift j r hr) hsf in
⟨k, by rw [algebra_map_succ, ← ring_hom.comp_assoc, hk, adjoin_root.lift_comp_of]⟩
theorem adjoin_roots (n : ℕ) : ∀ {α : Type u} [field α], by exactI
∀ (f : polynomial α) (hfn : f.nat_degree = n),
algebra.adjoin α (↑(f.map $ algebra_map α $ splitting_field_aux n f hfn).roots.to_finset :
set (splitting_field_aux n f hfn)) = ⊤ :=
nat.rec_on n (λ α _ f hf, by exactI algebra.eq_top_iff.2 (λ x, subalgebra.range_le _ ⟨x, rfl⟩)) $
λ n ih α _ f hfn, by exactI
have hndf : f.nat_degree ≠ 0, by { intro h, rw h at hfn, cases hfn },
have hfn0 : f ≠ 0, by { intro h, rw h at hndf, exact hndf rfl },
have hmf0 : map (algebra_map α (splitting_field_aux n.succ f hfn)) f ≠ 0 := map_ne_zero hfn0,
by { rw [algebra_map_succ, ← map_map, ← X_sub_C_mul_remove_factor _ hndf, map_mul] at hmf0 ⊢,
rw [roots_mul hmf0, map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C, multiset.to_finset_add, finset.coe_union,
multiset.to_finset_cons, multiset.to_finset_zero, insert_emptyc_eq, finset.coe_singleton,
algebra.adjoin_union, ← set.image_singleton, algebra.adjoin_algebra_map α (adjoin_root f.factor)
(splitting_field_aux n f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hfn)),
adjoin_root.adjoin_root_eq_top, algebra.map_top,
is_scalar_tower.range_under_adjoin α (adjoin_root f.factor)
(splitting_field_aux n f.remove_factor (nat_degree_remove_factor' hfn)),
ih, subalgebra.res_top] }
end splitting_field_aux
/-- A splitting field of a polynomial. -/
def splitting_field (f : polynomial α) :=
splitting_field_aux _ f rfl
namespace splitting_field
variables (f : polynomial α)
instance : field (splitting_field f) :=
splitting_field_aux.field _ _
instance inhabited : inhabited (splitting_field f) := ⟨37⟩
instance : algebra α (splitting_field f) :=
splitting_field_aux.algebra _ _
protected theorem splits : splits (algebra_map α (splitting_field f)) f :=
splitting_field_aux.splits _ _ _
variables [algebra α β] (hb : splits (algebra_map α β) f)
/-- Embeds the splitting field into any other field that splits the polynomial. -/
def lift : splitting_field f →ₐ[α] β :=
{ commutes' := λ r, by { have := classical.some_spec (splitting_field_aux.exists_lift _ _ _ _ hb),
exact ring_hom.ext_iff.1 this r },
.. classical.some (splitting_field_aux.exists_lift _ _ _ _ hb) }
theorem adjoin_roots : algebra.adjoin α
(↑(f.map (algebra_map α $ splitting_field f)).roots.to_finset : set (splitting_field f)) = ⊤ :=
splitting_field_aux.adjoin_roots _ _ _
end splitting_field
variables (α β) [algebra α β]
/-- Typeclass characterising splitting fields. -/
class is_splitting_field (f : polynomial α) : Prop :=
(splits [] : splits (algebra_map α β) f)
(adjoin_roots [] : algebra.adjoin α (↑(f.map (algebra_map α β)).roots.to_finset : set β) = ⊤)
namespace is_splitting_field
variables {α}
instance splitting_field (f : polynomial α) : is_splitting_field α (splitting_field f) f :=
⟨splitting_field.splits f, splitting_field.adjoin_roots f⟩
section scalar_tower
variables {α β γ} [algebra β γ] [algebra α γ] [is_scalar_tower α β γ]
variables {α}
instance map (f : polynomial α) [is_splitting_field α γ f] :
is_splitting_field β γ (f.map $ algebra_map α β) :=
⟨by { rw [splits_map_iff, ← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq], exact splits γ f },
subalgebra.res_inj α $ by { rw [map_map, ← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq, subalgebra.res_top,
eq_top_iff, ← adjoin_roots γ f, algebra.adjoin_le_iff],
exact λ x hx, @algebra.subset_adjoin β _ _ _ _ _ _ hx }⟩
variables {α} (β)
theorem splits_iff (f : polynomial α) [is_splitting_field α β f] :
polynomial.splits (ring_hom.id α) f ↔ (⊤ : subalgebra α β) = ⊥ :=
⟨λ h, eq_bot_iff.2 $ adjoin_roots β f ▸ (roots_map (algebra_map α β) h).symm ▸
algebra.adjoin_le_iff.2 (λ y hy,
let ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩ := finset.mem_image.1 (by rwa multiset.to_finset_map at hy) in
hxy ▸ subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ _),
λ h, @ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_refl α _ ▸
ring_equiv.trans_symm (ring_equiv.of_bijective _ $ algebra.bijective_algebra_map_iff.2 h) ▸
by { rw ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_trans, exact splits_comp_of_splits _ _ (splits β f) }⟩
theorem mul (f g : polynomial α) (hf : f ≠ 0) (hg : g ≠ 0) [is_splitting_field α β f]
[is_splitting_field β γ (g.map $ algebra_map α β)] :
is_splitting_field α γ (f * g) :=
⟨(is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq α β γ).symm ▸ splits_mul _
(splits_comp_of_splits _ _ (splits β f))
((splits_map_iff _ _).1 (splits γ $ g.map $ algebra_map α β)),
by rw [map_mul, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (map_ne_zero hf : f.map (algebra_map α γ) ≠ 0)
(map_ne_zero hg)), multiset.to_finset_add, finset.coe_union, algebra.adjoin_union,
is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq α β γ, ← map_map,
roots_map (algebra_map β γ) ((splits_id_iff_splits $ algebra_map α β).2 $ splits β f),
multiset.to_finset_map, finset.coe_image, algebra.adjoin_algebra_map, adjoin_roots,
algebra.map_top, is_scalar_tower.range_under_adjoin, ← map_map, adjoin_roots,
subalgebra.res_top]⟩
end scalar_tower
/-- Splitting field of `f` embeds into any field that splits `f`. -/
def lift [algebra α γ] (f : polynomial α) [is_splitting_field α β f]
(hf : polynomial.splits (algebra_map α γ) f) : β →ₐ[α] γ :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then (algebra.of_id α γ).comp $
(algebra.bot_equiv α β : (⊥ : subalgebra α β) →ₐ[α] α).comp $
by { rw ← (splits_iff β f).1 (show f.splits (ring_hom.id α), from hf0.symm ▸ splits_zero _),
exact algebra.to_top } else
alg_hom.comp (by { rw ← adjoin_roots β f, exact classical.choice (lift_of_splits _ $ λ y hy,
have aeval y f = 0, from (eval₂_eq_eval_map _).trans $
(mem_roots $ by exact map_ne_zero hf0).1 (multiset.mem_to_finset.mp hy),
⟨(is_algebraic_iff_is_integral _).1 ⟨f, hf0, this⟩,
splits_of_splits_of_dvd _ hf0 hf $ minpoly.dvd _ _ this⟩) })
algebra.to_top
theorem finite_dimensional (f : polynomial α) [is_splitting_field α β f] : finite_dimensional α β :=
finite_dimensional.iff_fg.2 $ @algebra.coe_top α β _ _ _ ▸ adjoin_roots β f ▸
fg_adjoin_of_finite (set.finite_mem_finset _) (λ y hy,
if hf : f = 0
then by { rw [hf, map_zero, roots_zero] at hy, cases hy }
else (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral _).1 ⟨f, hf, (eval₂_eq_eval_map _).trans $
(mem_roots $ by exact map_ne_zero hf).1 (multiset.mem_to_finset.mp hy)⟩)
/-- Any splitting field is isomorphic to `splitting_field f`. -/
def alg_equiv (f : polynomial α) [is_splitting_field α β f] : β ≃ₐ[α] splitting_field f :=
begin
refine alg_equiv.of_bijective (lift β f $ splits (splitting_field f) f)
⟨ring_hom.injective (lift β f $ splits (splitting_field f) f).to_ring_hom, _⟩,
haveI := finite_dimensional (splitting_field f) f,
haveI := finite_dimensional β f,
have : finite_dimensional.findim α β = finite_dimensional.findim α (splitting_field f) :=
le_antisymm
(linear_map.findim_le_findim_of_injective
(show function.injective (lift β f $ splits (splitting_field f) f).to_linear_map, from
ring_hom.injective (lift β f $ splits (splitting_field f) f : β →+* f.splitting_field)))
(linear_map.findim_le_findim_of_injective
(show function.injective (lift (splitting_field f) f $ splits β f).to_linear_map, from
ring_hom.injective (lift (splitting_field f) f $ splits β f : f.splitting_field →+* β))),
change function.surjective (lift β f $ splits (splitting_field f) f).to_linear_map,
refine (linear_map.injective_iff_surjective_of_findim_eq_findim this).1 _,
exact ring_hom.injective (lift β f $ splits (splitting_field f) f : β →+* f.splitting_field)
end
end is_splitting_field
end splitting_field
end polynomial
|
2ae93b800e97c2fb4c0ac8f3f9bf8b0f79b768a6 | 43390109ab88557e6090f3245c47479c123ee500 | /src/Topology/Material/topology_thoughts.lean | eba37101492b0d0dfc1030fa4526f89bdd93dcf0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Ja1941/xena-UROP-2018 | 41f0956519f94d56b8bf6834a8d39473f4923200 | b111fb87f343cf79eca3b886f99ee15c1dd9884b | refs/heads/master | 1,662,355,955,139 | 1,590,577,325,000 | 1,590,577,325,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 977 | lean | import analysis.metric_space
import tactic.norm_num
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
noncomputable theory
def discrete_metric_space' (α : Type*) : metric_space α :=
{
dist := λ a b, if a = b then 0 else 1,
dist_self := begin intro x, unfold ite,
rw eq_true_intro (eq.refl x), exact if_true 0 1,
end,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := begin intros x y, dsimp, split_ifs,
intro _,exact h,
norm_num,
end,
dist_comm := begin intros x y, dsimp,
split_ifs,
refl,
cases (h_1 h.symm),
cases (h h_1.symm),
refl
end,
dist_triangle := begin
intros, dsimp, split_ifs,
right,refl,
left,show (0 : ℝ) < 0 + 1,norm_num,
left,show (0 : ℝ) < 1 + 0,norm_num,
left,show (0 : ℝ) < 1 + 1,norm_num,
exfalso,apply h,rwa h_1,
right,refl,
right,refl,
left, show (1 : ℝ) < 1 + 1, norm_num,
end
} |
aefa06a4309f20d792ba3d7d27ade013c78c23ce | c3f2fcd060adfa2ca29f924839d2d925e8f2c685 | /hott/init/equiv.hlean | 3e291149301feb814450d4a400ab9aef018d6b0f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | respu/lean | 6582d19a2f2838a28ecd2b3c6f81c32d07b5341d | 8c76419c60b63d0d9f7bc04ebb0b99812d0ec654 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,882,451,231 | 1,427,747,084,000 | 1,427,747,429,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,801 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: init.equiv
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Jakob von Raumer
Ported from Coq HoTT
-/
prelude
import .path .function
open eq function
/- Equivalences -/
-- This is our definition of equivalence. In the HoTT-book it's called
-- ihae (half-adjoint equivalence).
structure is_equiv [class] {A B : Type} (f : A → B) :=
(inv : B → A)
(retr : (f ∘ inv) ∼ id)
(sect : (inv ∘ f) ∼ id)
(adj : Πx, retr (f x) = ap f (sect x))
attribute is_equiv.inv [quasireducible]
-- A more bundled version of equivalence
structure equiv (A B : Type) :=
(to_fun : A → B)
(to_is_equiv : is_equiv to_fun)
namespace is_equiv
/- Some instances and closure properties of equivalences -/
postfix `⁻¹` := inv
--a second notation for the inverse, which is not overloaded
postfix [parsing-only] `⁻¹ᵉ`:std.prec.max_plus := inv
section
variables {A B C : Type} (f : A → B) (g : B → C) {f' : A → B}
-- The identity function is an equivalence.
-- TODO: make A explicit
definition is_equiv_id : (@is_equiv A A id) := is_equiv.mk id (λa, idp) (λa, idp) (λa, idp)
-- The composition of two equivalences is, again, an equivalence.
definition is_equiv_compose [Hf : is_equiv f] [Hg : is_equiv g] : is_equiv (g ∘ f) :=
is_equiv.mk ((inv f) ∘ (inv g))
(λc, ap g (retr f (g⁻¹ c)) ⬝ retr g c)
(λa, ap (inv f) (sect g (f a)) ⬝ sect f a)
(λa, (whisker_left _ (adj g (f a))) ⬝
(ap_con g _ _)⁻¹ ⬝
ap02 g ((ap_con_eq_con (retr f) (sect g (f a)))⁻¹ ⬝
(ap_compose (inv f) f _ ◾ adj f a) ⬝
(ap_con f _ _)⁻¹
) ⬝
(ap_compose f g _)⁻¹
)
-- Any function equal to an equivalence is an equivlance as well.
definition is_equiv_eq_closed [Hf : is_equiv f] (Heq : f = f') : (is_equiv f') :=
eq.rec_on Heq Hf
-- Any function pointwise equal to an equivalence is an equivalence as well.
definition homotopy_closed [Hf : is_equiv f] (Hty : f ∼ f') : (is_equiv f') :=
let sect' := (λ b, (Hty (inv f b))⁻¹ ⬝ retr f b) in
let retr' := (λ a, (ap (inv f) (Hty a))⁻¹ ⬝ sect f a) in
let adj' := (λ (a : A),
let ff'a := Hty a in
let invf := inv f in
let secta := sect f a in
let retrfa := retr f (f a) in
let retrf'a := retr f (f' a) in
have eq1 : _ = _,
from calc ap f secta ⬝ ff'a
= retrfa ⬝ ff'a : by rewrite adj
... = ap (f ∘ invf) ff'a ⬝ retrf'a : by rewrite ap_con_eq_con
... = ap f (ap invf ff'a) ⬝ retrf'a : by rewrite ap_compose,
have eq2 : _ = _,
from calc retrf'a
= (ap f (ap invf ff'a))⁻¹ ⬝ (ap f secta ⬝ ff'a) : eq_inv_con_of_con_eq _ _ _ eq1⁻¹
... = (ap f (ap invf ff'a))⁻¹ ⬝ (ap f secta ⬝ Hty a) : ap_inv invf ff'a
... = (ap f (ap invf ff'a))⁻¹ ⬝ (Hty (invf (f a)) ⬝ ap f' secta) : by rewrite ap_con_eq_con_ap
... = ((ap f (ap invf ff'a))⁻¹ ⬝ Hty (invf (f a))) ⬝ ap f' secta : by rewrite con.assoc
... = (ap f (ap invf ff'a)⁻¹ ⬝ Hty (invf (f a))) ⬝ ap f' secta : by rewrite ap_inv
... = (Hty (invf (f' a)) ⬝ ap f' (ap invf ff'a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap f' secta : by rewrite ap_con_eq_con_ap
... = (Hty (invf (f' a)) ⬝ (ap f' (ap invf ff'a))⁻¹) ⬝ ap f' secta : by rewrite ap_inv
... = Hty (invf (f' a)) ⬝ ((ap f' (ap invf ff'a))⁻¹ ⬝ ap f' secta) : by rewrite con.assoc,
have eq3 : _ = _,
from calc (Hty (invf (f' a)))⁻¹ ⬝ retrf'a
= (ap f' (ap invf ff'a))⁻¹ ⬝ ap f' secta : inv_con_eq_of_eq_con _ _ _ eq2
... = (ap f' (ap invf ff'a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap f' secta : by rewrite ap_inv
... = ap f' ((ap invf ff'a)⁻¹ ⬝ secta) : by rewrite ap_con,
eq3) in
is_equiv.mk (inv f) sect' retr' adj'
end
context
parameters {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (g : B → A)
(ret : f ∘ g ∼ id) (sec : g ∘ f ∼ id)
private definition adjointify_sect' : g ∘ f ∼ id :=
(λx, ap g (ap f (inverse (sec x))) ⬝ ap g (ret (f x)) ⬝ sec x)
private definition adjointify_adj' : Π (x : A), ret (f x) = ap f (adjointify_sect' x) :=
(λ (a : A),
let fgretrfa := ap f (ap g (ret (f a))) in
let fgfinvsect := ap f (ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹)) in
let fgfa := f (g (f a)) in
let retrfa := ret (f a) in
have eq1 : ap f (sec a) = _,
from calc ap f (sec a)
= idp ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite idp_con
... = (ret (f a) ⬝ (ret (f a))⁻¹) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con.right_inv
... = ((ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (f ∘ g) (ret (f a))) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con_ap_eq_con
... = ((ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite ap_compose
... = (ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite con.assoc,
have eq2 : ap f (sec a) ⬝ idp = (ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)),
from !con_idp ⬝ eq1,
have eq3 : idp = _,
from calc idp
= (ap f (sec a))⁻¹ ⬝ ((ret fgfa)⁻¹ ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a))) : eq_inv_con_of_con_eq _ _ _ eq2
... = ((ap f (sec a))⁻¹ ⬝ (ret fgfa)⁻¹) ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = (ap f (sec a)⁻¹ ⬝ (ret fgfa)⁻¹) ⬝ (fgretrfa ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite ap_inv
... = ((ap f (sec a)⁻¹ ⬝ (ret fgfa)⁻¹) ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = ((retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ ap (f ∘ g) (ap f (sec a)⁻¹)) ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con_ap_eq_con
... = ((retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ fgfinvsect) ⬝ fgretrfa) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite ap_compose
... = (retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ (fgfinvsect ⬝ fgretrfa)) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ ap f (ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ ap f (sec a) : by rewrite ap_con
... = retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ (ap f (ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ ap f (sec a)) : by rewrite con.assoc'
... = retrfa⁻¹ ⬝ ap f ((ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ sec a) : by rewrite -ap_con,
have eq4 : ret (f a) = ap f ((ap g (ap f (sec a)⁻¹) ⬝ ap g (ret (f a))) ⬝ sec a),
from eq_of_idp_eq_inv_con _ _ eq3,
eq4)
definition adjointify : is_equiv f :=
is_equiv.mk g ret adjointify_sect' adjointify_adj'
end
section
variables {A B C : Type} (f : A → B) {f' : A → B} [Hf : is_equiv f] (g : B → C)
include Hf
--The inverse of an equivalence is, again, an equivalence.
definition is_equiv_inv [instance] : (is_equiv f⁻¹) :=
adjointify f⁻¹ f (sect f) (retr f)
definition cancel_right (g : B → C) [Hgf : is_equiv (g ∘ f)] : (is_equiv g) :=
have Hfinv [visible] : is_equiv f⁻¹, from is_equiv_inv f,
@homotopy_closed _ _ _ _ (is_equiv_compose f⁻¹ (g ∘ f)) (λb, ap g (@retr _ _ f _ b))
definition cancel_left (g : C → A) [Hgf : is_equiv (f ∘ g)] : (is_equiv g) :=
have Hfinv [visible] : is_equiv f⁻¹, from is_equiv_inv f,
@homotopy_closed _ _ _ _ (is_equiv_compose (f ∘ g) f⁻¹) (λa, sect f (g a))
definition is_equiv_ap [instance] (x y : A) : is_equiv (ap f) :=
adjointify (ap f)
(λq, (inverse (sect f x)) ⬝ ap f⁻¹ q ⬝ sect f y)
(λq, !ap_con
⬝ whisker_right !ap_con _
⬝ ((!ap_inv ⬝ inverse2 (adj f _)⁻¹)
◾ (inverse (ap_compose f⁻¹ f _))
◾ (adj f _)⁻¹)
⬝ con_ap_con_eq_con_con (retr f) _ _
⬝ whisker_right !con.left_inv _
⬝ !idp_con)
(λp, whisker_right (whisker_left _ (ap_compose f f⁻¹ _)⁻¹) _
⬝ con_ap_con_eq_con_con (sect f) _ _
⬝ whisker_right !con.left_inv _
⬝ !idp_con)
-- The function equiv_rect says that given an equivalence f : A → B,
-- and a hypothesis from B, one may always assume that the hypothesis
-- is in the image of e.
-- In fibrational terms, if we have a fibration over B which has a section
-- once pulled back along an equivalence f : A → B, then it has a section
-- over all of B.
definition equiv_rect (P : B → Type) :
(Πx, P (f x)) → (Πy, P y) :=
(λg y, eq.transport _ (retr f y) (g (f⁻¹ y)))
definition equiv_rect_comp (P : B → Type)
(df : Π (x : A), P (f x)) (x : A) : equiv_rect f P df (f x) = df x :=
calc equiv_rect f P df (f x)
= transport P (retr f (f x)) (df (f⁻¹ (f x))) : by esimp
... = transport P (eq.ap f (sect f x)) (df (f⁻¹ (f x))) : by rewrite adj
... = transport (P ∘ f) (sect f x) (df (f⁻¹ (f x))) : by rewrite -transport_compose
... = df x : by rewrite (apD df (sect f x))
end
section
variables {A B : Type} {f : A → B} [Hf : is_equiv f] {a : A} {b : B}
include Hf
--Rewrite rules
definition eq_of_eq_inv (p : a = f⁻¹ b) : f a = b :=
ap f p ⬝ retr f b
definition eq_of_inv_eq (p : f⁻¹ b = a) : b = f a :=
(eq_of_eq_inv p⁻¹)⁻¹
definition inv_eq_of_eq (p : b = f a) : f⁻¹ b = a :=
ap f⁻¹ p ⬝ sect f a
definition eq_inv_of_eq (p : f a = b) : a = f⁻¹ b :=
(inv_eq_of_eq p⁻¹)⁻¹
end
--Transporting is an equivalence
definition is_equiv_tr [instance] {A : Type} (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : (is_equiv (transport P p)) :=
is_equiv.mk (transport P p⁻¹) (tr_inv_tr P p) (inv_tr_tr P p) (tr_inv_tr_lemma P p)
end is_equiv
open is_equiv
namespace equiv
namespace ops
attribute to_fun [coercion]
end ops
open equiv.ops
attribute to_is_equiv [instance]
infix `≃`:25 := equiv
variables {A B C : Type}
protected definition MK [reducible] (f : A → B) (g : B → A)
(retr : f ∘ g ∼ id) (sect : g ∘ f ∼ id) : A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk f (adjointify f g retr sect)
definition to_inv [reducible] (f : A ≃ B) : B → A :=
f⁻¹
protected definition refl : A ≃ A :=
equiv.mk id !is_equiv_id
protected definition symm (f : A ≃ B) : B ≃ A :=
equiv.mk f⁻¹ !is_equiv_inv
protected definition trans (f : A ≃ B) (g: B ≃ C) : A ≃ C :=
equiv.mk (g ∘ f) !is_equiv_compose
definition equiv_of_eq_fn_of_equiv (f : A ≃ B) (f' : A → B) (Heq : f = f') : A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk f' (is_equiv_eq_closed f Heq)
definition eq_equiv_fn_eq (f : A → B) [H : is_equiv f] (a b : A) : (a = b) ≃ (f a = f b) :=
equiv.mk (ap f) !is_equiv_ap
definition eq_equiv_fn_eq_of_equiv (f : A ≃ B) (a b : A) : (a = b) ≃ (f a = f b) :=
equiv.mk (ap f) !is_equiv_ap
definition equiv_ap (P : A → Type) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : (P a) ≃ (P b) :=
equiv.mk (transport P p) !is_equiv_tr
--we need this theorem for the funext_of_ua proof
theorem inv_eq {A B : Type} (eqf eqg : A ≃ B) (p : eqf = eqg) : (to_fun eqf)⁻¹ = (to_fun eqg)⁻¹ :=
eq.rec_on p idp
-- calc enviroment
-- Note: Calculating with substitutions needs univalence
definition equiv_of_equiv_of_eq {A B C : Type} (p : A = B) (q : B ≃ C) : A ≃ C := p⁻¹ ▹ q
definition equiv_of_eq_of_equiv {A B C : Type} (p : A ≃ B) (q : B = C) : A ≃ C := q ▹ p
calc_trans equiv.trans
calc_refl equiv.refl
calc_symm equiv.symm
calc_trans equiv_of_equiv_of_eq
calc_trans equiv_of_eq_of_equiv
end equiv
|
f1420988e4c416a9f19885ab3477f585f7f9c498 | 217bb195841a8be2d1b4edd2084d6b69ccd62f50 | /tests/playground/parser/test1.lean | 34327e632c55291b046eb5bcba7751ce8ef0147a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | frank-lesser/lean4 | 717f56c9bacd5bf3a67542d2f5cea721d4743a30 | 79e2abe33f73162f773ea731265e456dbfe822f9 | refs/heads/master | 1,589,741,267,933 | 1,556,424,200,000 | 1,556,424,281,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,613 | lean | import parser
open Parser
def mkNumPairKind : IO SyntaxNodeKind := nextKind `numPair
@[init mkNumPairKind] constant numPairKind : SyntaxNodeKind := default _
def mkNumSetKind : IO SyntaxNodeKind := nextKind `numSet
@[init mkNumSetKind] constant numSetKind : SyntaxNodeKind := default _
def mkParenIdentKind : IO SyntaxNodeKind := nextKind `parenIdent
@[init mkParenIdentKind] constant parenIdentKind : SyntaxNodeKind := default _
def mkQualifiedKind : IO SyntaxNodeKind := nextKind `qualified
@[init mkQualifiedKind] constant qualifiedKind : SyntaxNodeKind := default _
def mkSeqKind : IO SyntaxNodeKind := nextKind `seq
@[init mkSeqKind] constant seqKind : SyntaxNodeKind := default _
def mkSetCompKind : IO SyntaxNodeKind := nextKind `setComp
@[init mkSetCompKind] constant setCompKind : SyntaxNodeKind := default _
-- set_option pp.implicit true
-- set_option trace.compiler.boxed true
def numPairP : TermParser :=
node numPairKind $
"("; number; ","; number; ")"
def numSetP : TermParser :=
node numSetKind $
"{"; sepBy number ","; "}"
def testParser1 : TermParser :=
many (numPairP <|> numSetP)
def parenIdentP : TermParser :=
node parenIdentKind $
"("; ident; ")"
def qualifiedP : TermParser :=
node qualifiedKind $
"("; ident; ":"; ident; ")"
def seqP : TermParser :=
node seqKind $
"("; sepBy ident ":"; ")"
def setCompP : TermParser :=
node setCompKind $
"{"; ident; ":"; ident; "|"; ident; "}"
def testParser2 : TermParser :=
many (longestMatch [qualifiedP, parenIdentP, seqP, setCompP])
def testParser3 : TermParser :=
many (longestMatch [qualifiedP, seqP])
@[noinline] def test (p : TermParser) (s : String) : IO Unit :=
match p.test s with
| Except.error msg := IO.println msg
| Except.ok stx := IO.println "ok" -- IO.println stx -- IO.println "ok"
def mkTestString1 : Nat → String → String
| 0 s := s
| (n+1) s := mkTestString1 n $
s ++ "{} /- /- comment2 -/ -/ "
++ "{" ++ toString n ++ "," ++ toString (n+1) ++ ", " ++ toString (n+2) ++ "}"
++ "(" ++ toString n ++ ", " ++ toString n ++ ") -- comment\n"
def test1 (n : Nat) : IO Unit :=
let s := mkTestString1 n "" in
test testParser1 s
def mkTestString2 : Nat → String → String
| 0 s := s
| (n+1) s := mkTestString2 n $
s ++ "(xyz) /- /- comment2 -/ -/ "
++ "(x:y:z) -- comment1 \n"
++ "(x:y)"
def test2 (n : Nat) : IO Unit :=
let s := mkTestString2 n "" in
test testParser2 s
def test3 (n : Nat) : IO Unit :=
let s := mkTestString2 n "" in
test testParser3 s
def main (xs : List String) : IO Unit :=
timeit "test2" (test2 xs.head.toNat) *>
timeit "test3" (test3 xs.head.toNat)
|
0e8cf2de03d196e8cd0b1af788623641de66c11b | 97f752b44fd85ec3f635078a2dd125ddae7a82b6 | /hott/types/bool.hlean | c25d5f1388b2d0825755e8529fe1a7d7198beb47 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tectronics/lean | ab977ba6be0fcd46047ddbb3c8e16e7c26710701 | f38af35e0616f89c6e9d7e3eb1d48e47ee666efe | refs/heads/master | 1,532,358,526,384 | 1,456,276,623,000 | 1,456,276,623,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,921 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn
Partially ported from the standard library
-/
open eq eq.ops decidable
namespace bool
local attribute bor [reducible]
local attribute band [reducible]
theorem dichotomy (b : bool) : b = ff ⊎ b = tt :=
bool.cases_on b (sum.inl rfl) (sum.inr rfl)
theorem cond_ff {A : Type} (t e : A) : cond ff t e = e :=
rfl
theorem cond_tt {A : Type} (t e : A) : cond tt t e = t :=
rfl
theorem eq_tt_of_ne_ff : Π {a : bool}, a ≠ ff → a = tt
| @eq_tt_of_ne_ff tt H := rfl
| @eq_tt_of_ne_ff ff H := absurd rfl H
theorem eq_ff_of_ne_tt : Π {a : bool}, a ≠ tt → a = ff
| @eq_ff_of_ne_tt tt H := absurd rfl H
| @eq_ff_of_ne_tt ff H := rfl
theorem absurd_of_eq_ff_of_eq_tt {B : Type} {a : bool} (H₁ : a = ff) (H₂ : a = tt) : B :=
absurd (H₁⁻¹ ⬝ H₂) ff_ne_tt
theorem tt_bor (a : bool) : bor tt a = tt :=
rfl
notation a || b := bor a b
theorem bor_tt (a : bool) : a || tt = tt :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem ff_bor (a : bool) : ff || a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bor_ff (a : bool) : a || ff = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bor_self (a : bool) : a || a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bor.comm (a b : bool) : a || b = b || a :=
by cases a; repeat (cases b | reflexivity)
theorem bor.assoc (a b c : bool) : (a || b) || c = a || (b || c) :=
match a with
| ff := by rewrite *ff_bor
| tt := by rewrite *tt_bor
end
theorem or_of_bor_eq {a b : bool} : a || b = tt → a = tt ⊎ b = tt :=
bool.rec_on a
(suppose ff || b = tt,
have b = tt, from !ff_bor ▸ this,
sum.inr this)
(suppose tt || b = tt,
sum.inl rfl)
theorem bor_inl {a b : bool} (H : a = tt) : a || b = tt :=
by rewrite H
theorem bor_inr {a b : bool} (H : b = tt) : a || b = tt :=
bool.rec_on a (by rewrite H) (by rewrite H)
theorem ff_band (a : bool) : ff && a = ff :=
rfl
theorem tt_band (a : bool) : tt && a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band_ff (a : bool) : a && ff = ff :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band_tt (a : bool) : a && tt = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band_self (a : bool) : a && a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band.comm (a b : bool) : a && b = b && a :=
bool.cases_on a
(bool.cases_on b rfl rfl)
(bool.cases_on b rfl rfl)
theorem band.assoc (a b c : bool) : (a && b) && c = a && (b && c) :=
match a with
| ff := by rewrite *ff_band
| tt := by rewrite *tt_band
end
theorem band_elim_left {a b : bool} (H : a && b = tt) : a = tt :=
sum.elim (dichotomy a)
(suppose a = ff,
absurd
(calc ff = ff && b : ff_band
... = a && b : this
... = tt : H)
ff_ne_tt)
(suppose a = tt, this)
theorem band_intro {a b : bool} (H₁ : a = tt) (H₂ : b = tt) : a && b = tt :=
by rewrite [H₁, H₂]
theorem band_elim_right {a b : bool} (H : a && b = tt) : b = tt :=
band_elim_left (!band.comm ⬝ H)
theorem bnot_bnot (a : bool) : bnot (bnot a) = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bnot_empty : bnot ff = tt :=
rfl
theorem bnot_unit : bnot tt = ff :=
rfl
theorem eq_tt_of_bnot_eq_ff {a : bool} : bnot a = ff → a = tt :=
bool.cases_on a (by contradiction) (λ h, rfl)
theorem eq_ff_of_bnot_eq_tt {a : bool} : bnot a = tt → a = ff :=
bool.cases_on a (λ h, rfl) (by contradiction)
definition bxor (x:bool) (y:bool) := cond x (bnot y) y
/- HoTT-related stuff -/
open is_equiv equiv function is_trunc option unit decidable
definition is_equiv_bnot [constructor] [instance] [priority 500] : is_equiv bnot :=
begin
fapply is_equiv.mk,
exact bnot,
all_goals (intro b;cases b), do 6 reflexivity
-- all_goals (focus (intro b;cases b;all_goals reflexivity)),
end
definition bnot_ne : Π(b : bool), bnot b ≠ b
| bnot_ne tt := ff_ne_tt
| bnot_ne ff := ne.symm ff_ne_tt
definition equiv_bnot [constructor] : bool ≃ bool := equiv.mk bnot _
definition eq_bnot : bool = bool := ua equiv_bnot
definition eq_bnot_ne_idp : eq_bnot ≠ idp :=
assume H : eq_bnot = idp,
assert H2 : bnot = id, from !cast_ua_fn⁻¹ ⬝ ap cast H,
absurd (ap10 H2 tt) ff_ne_tt
theorem is_set_bool : is_set bool := _
theorem not_is_prop_bool_eq_bool : ¬ is_prop (bool = bool) :=
λ H, eq_bnot_ne_idp !is_prop.elim
definition bool_equiv_option_unit [constructor] : bool ≃ option unit :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro b, cases b, exact none, exact some star},
{ intro u, cases u, exact ff, exact tt},
{ intro u, cases u with u, reflexivity, cases u, reflexivity},
{ intro b, cases b, reflexivity, reflexivity},
end
definition tbool [constructor] : Set := trunctype.mk bool _
end bool
|
ea36135937b1993583074ce81d0f9b3449c9d89f | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/category_theory/pempty_auto.lean | 2d2cdecb28d941db328b0ee9369a3ae5f6315e74 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,502 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta.
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.category_theory.discrete_category
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes v u
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# The empty category
Defines a category structure on `pempty`, and the unique functor `pempty ⥤ C` for any category `C`.
-/
namespace category_theory
namespace functor
/-- The canonical functor out of the empty category. -/
def empty (C : Type u) [category C] : discrete pempty ⥤ C := discrete.functor pempty.elim
/-- Any two functors out of the empty category are isomorphic. -/
def empty_ext {C : Type u} [category C] (F : discrete pempty ⥤ C) (G : discrete pempty ⥤ C) :
F ≅ G :=
discrete.nat_iso fun (x : discrete pempty) => pempty.elim x
/--
Any functor out of the empty category is isomorphic to the canonical functor from the empty
category.
-/
def unique_from_empty {C : Type u} [category C] (F : discrete pempty ⥤ C) : F ≅ empty C :=
empty_ext F (empty C)
/--
Any two functors out of the empty category are *equal*. You probably want to use
`empty_ext` instead of this.
-/
theorem empty_ext' {C : Type u} [category C] (F : discrete pempty ⥤ C) (G : discrete pempty ⥤ C) :
F = G :=
ext (fun (x : discrete pempty) => pempty.elim x)
fun (x _x : discrete pempty) (_x_1 : x ⟶ _x) => pempty.elim x
end Mathlib |
5412edb2a0bfcac73bedf0c2d772d6220bda24f8 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /tests/lean/run/specialize1.lean | 8f473d397a8712f973ad1a1778eb0afb7e6f2b35 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 668 | lean | example (x y z : Prop) (f : x → y → z) (xp : x) (yp : y) : z := by
specialize f xp yp
assumption
example (B C : Prop) (f : forall (A : Prop), A → C) (x : B) : C := by
specialize f _ x
exact f
example (B C : Prop) (f : forall {A : Prop}, A → C) (x : B) : C := by
specialize f x
exact f
example (B C : Prop) (f : forall {A : Prop}, A → C) (x : B) : C := by
specialize @f _ x
exact f
example (X : Type) [Add X] (f : forall {A : Type} [Add A], A → A → A) (x : X) : X := by
specialize f x x
assumption
def ex (f : Nat → Nat → Nat) : Nat := by
specialize f _ _
exact f
exact 10
exact 2
example : ex (· - ·) = 8 :=
rfl
|
b74ca54742cff1c0c89786a3f22f7452d02fc5e5 | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/order/bounded_lattice.lean | 82c56da92482b4d34a165b8acbfb4a3fbd9fac05 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 49,031 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.option.basic
import logic.nontrivial
import order.lattice
import tactic.pi_instances
/-!
# ⊤ and ⊥, bounded lattices and variants
This file defines top and bottom elements (greatest and least elements) of a type, the bounded
variants of different kinds of lattices, sets up the typeclass hierarchy between them and provides
instances for `Prop` and `fun`.
## Main declarations
* `has_<top/bot> α`: Typeclasses to declare the `⊤`/`⊥` notation.
* `order_<top/bot> α`: Order with a top/bottom element.
* `with_<top/bot> α`: Equips `option α` with the order on `α` plus `none` as the top/bottom element.
* `semilattice_<sup/inf>_<top/bot>`: Semilattice with a join/meet and a top/bottom element (all four
combinations). Typical examples include `ℕ`.
* `bounded_lattice α`: Lattice with a top and bottom element.
* `distrib_lattice_bot α`: Distributive lattice with a bottom element. It captures the properties
of `disjoint` that are common to `generalized_boolean_algebra` and `bounded_distrib_lattice`.
* `bounded_distrib_lattice α`: Bounded and distributive lattice. Typical examples include `Prop` and
`set α`.
* `is_compl x y`: In a bounded lattice, predicate for "`x` is a complement of `y`". Note that in a
non distributive lattice, an element can have several complements.
* `is_complemented α`: Typeclass stating that any element of a lattice has a complement.
## Implementation notes
We didn't define `distrib_lattice_top` because the dual notion of `disjoint` isn't really used
anywhere.
-/
/-! ### Top, bottom element -/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- Typeclass for the `⊤` (`\top`) notation -/
@[notation_class] class has_top (α : Type u) := (top : α)
/-- Typeclass for the `⊥` (`\bot`) notation -/
@[notation_class] class has_bot (α : Type u) := (bot : α)
notation `⊤` := has_top.top
notation `⊥` := has_bot.bot
@[priority 100] instance has_top_nonempty (α : Type u) [has_top α] : nonempty α := ⟨⊤⟩
@[priority 100] instance has_bot_nonempty (α : Type u) [has_bot α] : nonempty α := ⟨⊥⟩
attribute [pattern] has_bot.bot has_top.top
/-- An `order_top` is a partial order with a greatest element.
(We could state this on preorders, but then it wouldn't be unique
so distinguishing one would seem odd.) -/
class order_top (α : Type u) extends has_top α, partial_order α :=
(le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤)
section order_top
variables [order_top α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem le_top : a ≤ ⊤ :=
order_top.le_top a
theorem top_unique (h : ⊤ ≤ a) : a = ⊤ :=
le_top.antisymm h
-- TODO: delete in favor of the next?
theorem eq_top_iff : a = ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ≤ a :=
⟨λ eq, eq.symm ▸ le_refl ⊤, top_unique⟩
@[simp] theorem top_le_iff : ⊤ ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨top_unique, λ h, h.symm ▸ le_refl ⊤⟩
@[simp] theorem not_top_lt : ¬ ⊤ < a :=
λ h, lt_irrefl a (lt_of_le_of_lt le_top h)
theorem eq_top_mono (h : a ≤ b) (h₂ : a = ⊤) : b = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 $ h₂ ▸ h
lemma lt_top_iff_ne_top : a < ⊤ ↔ a ≠ ⊤ := le_top.lt_iff_ne
lemma ne_top_of_lt (h : a < b) : a ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 $ lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem ne_top_of_le_ne_top {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ ⊤) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≠ ⊤ :=
λ ha, hb $ top_unique $ ha ▸ hab
lemma eq_top_of_maximal (h : ∀ b, ¬ a < b) : a = ⊤ :=
or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le le_top) (λ hlt, absurd hlt (h ⊤)) (λ he, he)
end order_top
lemma strict_mono.top_preimage_top' [linear_order α] [order_top β]
{f : α → β} (H : strict_mono f) {a} (h_top : f a = ⊤) (x : α) :
x ≤ a :=
H.top_preimage_top (λ p, by { rw h_top, exact le_top }) x
theorem order_top.ext_top {α} {A B : order_top α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
(by haveI := A; exact ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ by rw ← H; apply le_top
theorem order_top.ext {α} {A B : order_top α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B :=
begin
have := partial_order.ext H,
have tt := order_top.ext_top H,
casesI A, casesI B,
injection this; congr'
end
/-- An `order_bot` is a partial order with a least element.
(We could state this on preorders, but then it wouldn't be unique
so distinguishing one would seem odd.) -/
class order_bot (α : Type u) extends has_bot α, partial_order α :=
(bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a)
section order_bot
variables [order_bot α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem bot_le : ⊥ ≤ a := order_bot.bot_le a
theorem bot_unique (h : a ≤ ⊥) : a = ⊥ :=
h.antisymm bot_le
-- TODO: delete?
theorem eq_bot_iff : a = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ ⊥ :=
⟨λ eq, eq.symm ▸ le_refl ⊥, bot_unique⟩
@[simp] theorem le_bot_iff : a ≤ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨bot_unique, λ h, h.symm ▸ le_refl ⊥⟩
@[simp] theorem not_lt_bot : ¬ a < ⊥ :=
λ h, lt_irrefl a (lt_of_lt_of_le h bot_le)
theorem ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hab : b ≤ a) : a ≠ ⊥ :=
λ ha, hb $ bot_unique $ ha ▸ hab
theorem eq_bot_mono (h : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b = ⊥) : a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 $ h₂ ▸ h
lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : ⊥ < a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α,
haveI : decidable (a ≤ ⊥) := decidable_of_iff' _ le_bot_iff,
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_iff_not.mpr le_bot_iff, true_and, bot_le],
end
lemma ne_bot_of_gt (h : a < b) : b ≠ ⊥ :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le h
lemma eq_bot_of_minimal (h : ∀ b, ¬ b < a) : a = ⊥ :=
or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le bot_le) (λ hlt, absurd hlt (h ⊥)) (λ he, he.symm)
end order_bot
lemma strict_mono.bot_preimage_bot' [linear_order α] [order_bot β]
{f : α → β} (H : strict_mono f) {a} (h_bot : f a = ⊥) (x : α) :
a ≤ x :=
H.bot_preimage_bot (λ p, by { rw h_bot, exact bot_le }) x
theorem order_bot.ext_bot {α} {A B : order_bot α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
(by haveI := A; exact ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ by rw ← H; apply bot_le
theorem order_bot.ext {α} {A B : order_bot α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B :=
begin
have := partial_order.ext H,
have tt := order_bot.ext_bot H,
casesI A, casesI B,
injection this; congr'
end
/-- A `semilattice_sup_top` is a semilattice with top and join. -/
class semilattice_sup_top (α : Type u) extends order_top α, semilattice_sup α
section semilattice_sup_top
variables [semilattice_sup_top α] {a : α}
@[simp] theorem top_sup_eq : ⊤ ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
sup_of_le_left le_top
@[simp] theorem sup_top_eq : a ⊔ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
sup_of_le_right le_top
end semilattice_sup_top
/-- A `semilattice_sup_bot` is a semilattice with bottom and join. -/
class semilattice_sup_bot (α : Type u) extends order_bot α, semilattice_sup α
section semilattice_sup_bot
variables [semilattice_sup_bot α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem bot_sup_eq : ⊥ ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right bot_le
@[simp] theorem sup_bot_eq : a ⊔ ⊥ = a :=
sup_of_le_left bot_le
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_bot_iff : a ⊔ b = ⊥ ↔ (a = ⊥ ∧ b = ⊥) :=
by rw [eq_bot_iff, sup_le_iff]; simp
end semilattice_sup_bot
instance nat.semilattice_sup_bot : semilattice_sup_bot ℕ :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := nat.zero_le, .. nat.distrib_lattice }
/-- A `semilattice_inf_top` is a semilattice with top and meet. -/
class semilattice_inf_top (α : Type u) extends order_top α, semilattice_inf α
section semilattice_inf_top
variables [semilattice_inf_top α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem top_inf_eq : ⊤ ⊓ a = a :=
inf_of_le_right le_top
@[simp] theorem inf_top_eq : a ⊓ ⊤ = a :=
inf_of_le_left le_top
@[simp] theorem inf_eq_top_iff : a ⊓ b = ⊤ ↔ (a = ⊤ ∧ b = ⊤) :=
by rw [eq_top_iff, le_inf_iff]; simp
end semilattice_inf_top
/-- A `semilattice_inf_bot` is a semilattice with bottom and meet. -/
class semilattice_inf_bot (α : Type u) extends order_bot α, semilattice_inf α
section semilattice_inf_bot
variables [semilattice_inf_bot α] {a : α}
@[simp] theorem bot_inf_eq : ⊥ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
inf_of_le_left bot_le
@[simp] theorem inf_bot_eq : a ⊓ ⊥ = ⊥ :=
inf_of_le_right bot_le
end semilattice_inf_bot
/-! ### Bounded lattice -/
/-- A bounded lattice is a lattice with a top and bottom element,
denoted `⊤` and `⊥` respectively. This allows for the interpretation
of all finite suprema and infima, taking `inf ∅ = ⊤` and `sup ∅ = ⊥`. -/
class bounded_lattice (α : Type u) extends lattice α, order_top α, order_bot α
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_inf_top_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] :
semilattice_inf_top α :=
{ le_top := λ x, @le_top α _ x, ..bl }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_inf_bot_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] :
semilattice_inf_bot α :=
{ bot_le := λ x, @bot_le α _ x, ..bl }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_sup_top_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] :
semilattice_sup_top α :=
{ le_top := λ x, @le_top α _ x, ..bl }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_sup_bot_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] :
semilattice_sup_bot α :=
{ bot_le := λ x, @bot_le α _ x, ..bl }
theorem bounded_lattice.ext {α} {A B : bounded_lattice α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B :=
begin
have H1 : @bounded_lattice.to_lattice α A =
@bounded_lattice.to_lattice α B := lattice.ext H,
have H2 := order_bot.ext H,
have H3 : @bounded_lattice.to_order_top α A =
@bounded_lattice.to_order_top α B := order_top.ext H,
have tt := order_bot.ext_bot H,
casesI A, casesI B,
injection H1; injection H2; injection H3; congr'
end
/-- A `distrib_lattice_bot` is a distributive lattice with a least element. -/
class distrib_lattice_bot α extends distrib_lattice α, semilattice_inf_bot α, semilattice_sup_bot α
/-- A bounded distributive lattice is exactly what it sounds like. -/
class bounded_distrib_lattice α extends distrib_lattice_bot α, bounded_lattice α
lemma inf_eq_bot_iff_le_compl {α : Type u} [bounded_distrib_lattice α] {a b c : α}
(h₁ : b ⊔ c = ⊤) (h₂ : b ⊓ c = ⊥) : a ⊓ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ c :=
⟨λ h,
calc a ≤ a ⊓ (b ⊔ c) : by simp [h₁]
... = (a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a ⊓ c) : by simp [inf_sup_left]
... ≤ c : by simp [h, inf_le_right],
λ h,
bot_unique $
calc a ⊓ b ≤ b ⊓ c : by { rw inf_comm, exact inf_le_inf_left _ h }
... = ⊥ : h₂⟩
/-- Propositions form a bounded distributive lattice. -/
instance Prop.bounded_distrib_lattice : bounded_distrib_lattice Prop :=
{ le := λ a b, a → b,
le_refl := λ _, id,
le_trans := λ a b c f g, g ∘ f,
le_antisymm := λ a b Hab Hba, propext ⟨Hab, Hba⟩,
sup := or,
le_sup_left := @or.inl,
le_sup_right := @or.inr,
sup_le := λ a b c, or.rec,
inf := and,
inf_le_left := @and.left,
inf_le_right := @and.right,
le_inf := λ a b c Hab Hac Ha, and.intro (Hab Ha) (Hac Ha),
le_sup_inf := λ a b c H, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $
λ Ha, ⟨H.1.resolve_left Ha, H.2.resolve_left Ha⟩,
top := true,
le_top := λ a Ha, true.intro,
bot := false,
bot_le := @false.elim }
noncomputable instance Prop.linear_order : linear_order Prop :=
{ le_total := by intros p q; change (p → q) ∨ (q → p); tauto!,
decidable_le := classical.dec_rel _,
.. (_ : partial_order Prop) }
@[simp] lemma le_Prop_eq : ((≤) : Prop → Prop → Prop) = (→) := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_Prop_eq : (⊔) = (∨) := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_Prop_eq : (⊓) = (∧) := rfl
section logic
variable [preorder α]
theorem monotone_and {p q : α → Prop} (m_p : monotone p) (m_q : monotone q) :
monotone (λ x, p x ∧ q x) :=
λ a b h, and.imp (m_p h) (m_q h)
-- Note: by finish [monotone] doesn't work
theorem monotone_or {p q : α → Prop} (m_p : monotone p) (m_q : monotone q) :
monotone (λ x, p x ∨ q x) :=
λ a b h, or.imp (m_p h) (m_q h)
end logic
instance pi.order_bot {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, order_bot $ β a] : order_bot (Π a, β a) :=
{ bot := λ _, ⊥,
bot_le := λ x a, bot_le,
.. pi.partial_order }
/-! ### Function lattices -/
instance pi.has_sup {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_sup (α i)] : has_sup (Π i, α i) :=
⟨λ f g i, f i ⊔ g i⟩
@[simp] lemma sup_apply {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_sup (α i)] (f g : Π i, α i) (i : ι) :
(f ⊔ g) i = f i ⊔ g i :=
rfl
instance pi.has_inf {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_inf (α i)] : has_inf (Π i, α i) :=
⟨λ f g i, f i ⊓ g i⟩
@[simp] lemma inf_apply {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_inf (α i)] (f g : Π i, α i) (i : ι) :
(f ⊓ g) i = f i ⊓ g i :=
rfl
instance pi.has_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_bot (α i)] : has_bot (Π i, α i) :=
⟨λ i, ⊥⟩
@[simp] lemma bot_apply {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_bot (α i)] (i : ι) :
(⊥ : Π i, α i) i = ⊥ :=
rfl
instance pi.has_top {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_top (α i)] : has_top (Π i, α i) :=
⟨λ i, ⊤⟩
@[simp] lemma top_apply {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, has_top (α i)] (i : ι) :
(⊤ : Π i, α i) i = ⊤ :=
rfl
instance pi.semilattice_sup {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, semilattice_sup (α i)] :
semilattice_sup (Π i, α i) :=
by refine_struct { sup := (⊔), .. pi.partial_order }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance pi.semilattice_inf {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, semilattice_inf (α i)] :
semilattice_inf (Π i, α i) :=
by refine_struct { inf := (⊓), .. pi.partial_order }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance pi.semilattice_inf_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, semilattice_inf_bot (α i)] :
semilattice_inf_bot (Π i, α i) :=
by refine_struct { inf := (⊓), bot := ⊥, .. pi.partial_order }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance pi.semilattice_inf_top {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, semilattice_inf_top (α i)] :
semilattice_inf_top (Π i, α i) :=
by refine_struct { inf := (⊓), top := ⊤, .. pi.partial_order }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance pi.semilattice_sup_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, semilattice_sup_bot (α i)] :
semilattice_sup_bot (Π i, α i) :=
by refine_struct { sup := (⊔), bot := ⊥, .. pi.partial_order }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance pi.semilattice_sup_top {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, semilattice_sup_top (α i)] :
semilattice_sup_top (Π i, α i) :=
by refine_struct { sup := (⊔), top := ⊤, .. pi.partial_order }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance pi.lattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, lattice (α i)] : lattice (Π i, α i) :=
{ .. pi.semilattice_sup, .. pi.semilattice_inf }
instance pi.distrib_lattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, distrib_lattice (α i)] :
distrib_lattice (Π i, α i) :=
by refine_struct { .. pi.lattice }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance pi.bounded_lattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, bounded_lattice (α i)] :
bounded_lattice (Π i, α i) :=
{ .. pi.semilattice_sup_top, .. pi.semilattice_inf_bot }
instance pi.distrib_lattice_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, distrib_lattice_bot (α i)] :
distrib_lattice_bot (Π i, α i) :=
{ .. pi.distrib_lattice, .. pi.order_bot }
instance pi.bounded_distrib_lattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[Π i, bounded_distrib_lattice (α i)] :
bounded_distrib_lattice (Π i, α i) :=
{ .. pi.bounded_lattice, .. pi.distrib_lattice }
lemma eq_bot_of_bot_eq_top {α : Type*} [bounded_lattice α] (hα : (⊥ : α) = ⊤) (x : α) :
x = (⊥ : α) :=
eq_bot_mono le_top (eq.symm hα)
lemma eq_top_of_bot_eq_top {α : Type*} [bounded_lattice α] (hα : (⊥ : α) = ⊤) (x : α) :
x = (⊤ : α) :=
eq_top_mono bot_le hα
lemma subsingleton_of_top_le_bot {α : Type*} [bounded_lattice α] (h : (⊤ : α) ≤ (⊥ : α)) :
subsingleton α :=
⟨λ a b, le_antisymm (le_trans le_top $ le_trans h bot_le) (le_trans le_top $ le_trans h bot_le)⟩
lemma subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top {α : Type*} [bounded_lattice α] (hα : (⊥ : α) = (⊤ : α)) :
subsingleton α :=
subsingleton_of_top_le_bot (ge_of_eq hα)
lemma subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top {α : Type*} [bounded_lattice α] :
(⊥ : α) = (⊤ : α) ↔ subsingleton α :=
⟨subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top, λ h, by exactI subsingleton.elim ⊥ ⊤⟩
/-! ### `with_bot`, `with_top` -/
/-- Attach `⊥` to a type. -/
def with_bot (α : Type*) := option α
namespace with_bot
meta instance {α} [has_to_format α] : has_to_format (with_bot α) :=
{ to_format := λ x,
match x with
| none := "⊥"
| (some x) := to_fmt x
end }
instance : has_coe_t α (with_bot α) := ⟨some⟩
instance has_bot : has_bot (with_bot α) := ⟨none⟩
instance : inhabited (with_bot α) := ⟨⊥⟩
lemma none_eq_bot : (none : with_bot α) = (⊥ : with_bot α) := rfl
lemma some_eq_coe (a : α) : (some a : with_bot α) = (↑a : with_bot α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem bot_ne_coe (a : α) : ⊥ ≠ (a : with_bot α) .
@[simp] theorem coe_ne_bot (a : α) : (a : with_bot α) ≠ ⊥ .
/-- Recursor for `with_bot` using the preferred forms `⊥` and `↑a`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def rec_bot_coe {C : with_bot α → Sort*} (h₁ : C ⊥) (h₂ : Π (a : α), C a) :
Π (n : with_bot α), C n :=
option.rec h₁ h₂
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {a b : α} : (a : with_bot α) = b ↔ a = b :=
by rw [← option.some.inj_eq a b]; refl
@[priority 10]
instance has_lt [has_lt α] : has_lt (with_bot α) :=
{ lt := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∃ b ∈ o₂, ∀ a ∈ o₁, a < b }
@[simp] theorem some_lt_some [has_lt α] {a b : α} :
@has_lt.lt (with_bot α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a < b :=
by simp [(<)]
lemma bot_lt_some [has_lt α] (a : α) : (⊥ : with_bot α) < some a :=
⟨a, rfl, λ b hb, (option.not_mem_none _ hb).elim⟩
lemma bot_lt_coe [has_lt α] (a : α) : (⊥ : with_bot α) < a := bot_lt_some a
instance : can_lift (with_bot α) α :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := λ r, r ≠ ⊥,
prf := λ x hx, ⟨option.get $ option.ne_none_iff_is_some.1 hx, option.some_get _⟩ }
instance [preorder α] : preorder (with_bot α) :=
{ le := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∀ a ∈ o₁, ∃ b ∈ o₂, a ≤ b,
lt := (<),
lt_iff_le_not_le := by intros; cases a; cases b;
simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]; simp [(<)];
split; refl,
le_refl := λ o a ha, ⟨a, ha, le_refl _⟩,
le_trans := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha,
let ⟨b, hb, ab⟩ := h₁ a ha, ⟨c, hc, bc⟩ := h₂ b hb in
⟨c, hc, le_trans ab bc⟩ }
instance partial_order [partial_order α] : partial_order (with_bot α) :=
{ le_antisymm := λ o₁ o₂ h₁ h₂, begin
cases o₁ with a,
{ cases o₂ with b, {refl},
rcases h₂ b rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩ },
{ rcases h₁ a rfl with ⟨b, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
rcases h₂ b rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h₂'⟩,
rw le_antisymm h₁' h₂' }
end,
.. with_bot.preorder }
instance order_bot [partial_order α] : order_bot (with_bot α) :=
{ bot_le := λ a a' h, option.no_confusion h,
..with_bot.partial_order, ..with_bot.has_bot }
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_le_coe [preorder α] {a b : α} :
(a : with_bot α) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by rcases h a rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩; exact h,
λ h a' e, option.some_inj.1 e ▸ ⟨b, rfl, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem some_le_some [preorder α] {a b : α} :
@has_le.le (with_bot α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a ≤ b := coe_le_coe
theorem coe_le [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
∀ {o : option α}, b ∈ o → ((a : with_bot α) ≤ o ↔ a ≤ b)
| _ rfl := coe_le_coe
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_lt_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} : (a : with_bot α) < b ↔ a < b := some_lt_some
lemma le_coe_get_or_else [preorder α] : ∀ (a : with_bot α) (b : α), a ≤ a.get_or_else b
| (some a) b := le_refl a
| none b := λ _ h, option.no_confusion h
@[simp] lemma get_or_else_bot (a : α) : option.get_or_else (⊥ : with_bot α) a = a := rfl
lemma get_or_else_bot_le_iff [order_bot α] {a : with_bot α} {b : α} :
a.get_or_else ⊥ ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by cases a; simp [none_eq_bot, some_eq_coe]
instance decidable_le [preorder α] [@decidable_rel α (≤)] : @decidable_rel (with_bot α) (≤)
| none x := is_true $ λ a h, option.no_confusion h
| (some x) (some y) :=
if h : x ≤ y
then is_true (some_le_some.2 h)
else is_false $ by simp *
| (some x) none := is_false $ λ h, by rcases h x rfl with ⟨y, ⟨_⟩, _⟩
instance decidable_lt [has_lt α] [@decidable_rel α (<)] : @decidable_rel (with_bot α) (<)
| none (some x) := is_true $ by existsi [x,rfl]; rintros _ ⟨⟩
| (some x) (some y) :=
if h : x < y
then is_true $ by simp *
else is_false $ by simp *
| x none := is_false $ by rintro ⟨a,⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
instance [partial_order α] [is_total α (≤)] : is_total (with_bot α) (≤) :=
{ total := λ a b, match a, b with
| none , _ := or.inl bot_le
| _ , none := or.inr bot_le
| some x, some y := by simp only [some_le_some, total_of]
end }
instance linear_order [linear_order α] : linear_order (with_bot α) :=
{ le_total := λ o₁ o₂, begin
cases o₁ with a, {exact or.inl bot_le},
cases o₂ with b, {exact or.inr bot_le},
simp [le_total]
end,
decidable_le := with_bot.decidable_le,
decidable_lt := with_bot.decidable_lt,
..with_bot.partial_order }
instance semilattice_sup [semilattice_sup α] : semilattice_sup_bot (with_bot α) :=
{ sup := option.lift_or_get (⊔),
le_sup_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₂; simp [option.lift_or_get],
le_sup_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₁; simp [option.lift_or_get],
sup_le := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases o₁ with b; cases o₂ with c; cases ha,
{ exact h₂ a rfl },
{ exact h₁ a rfl },
{ rcases h₁ b rfl with ⟨d, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
simp at h₂,
exact ⟨d, rfl, sup_le h₁' h₂⟩ }
end,
..with_bot.order_bot }
lemma coe_sup [semilattice_sup α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊔ b : α) : with_bot α) = a ⊔ b := rfl
instance semilattice_inf [semilattice_inf α] : semilattice_inf_bot (with_bot α) :=
{ inf := λ o₁ o₂, o₁.bind (λ a, o₂.map (λ b, a ⊓ b)),
inf_le_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, inf_le_left⟩
end,
inf_le_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, inf_le_right⟩
end,
le_inf := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases ha,
rcases h₁ a rfl with ⟨b, ⟨⟩, ab⟩,
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨c, ⟨⟩, ac⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, le_inf ab ac⟩
end,
..with_bot.order_bot }
lemma coe_inf [semilattice_inf α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊓ b : α) : with_bot α) = a ⊓ b := rfl
instance lattice [lattice α] : lattice (with_bot α) :=
{ ..with_bot.semilattice_sup, ..with_bot.semilattice_inf }
theorem lattice_eq_DLO [linear_order α] :
lattice_of_linear_order = @with_bot.lattice α _ :=
lattice.ext $ λ x y, iff.rfl
theorem sup_eq_max [linear_order α] (x y : with_bot α) : x ⊔ y = max x y :=
by rw [← sup_eq_max, lattice_eq_DLO]
theorem inf_eq_min [linear_order α] (x y : with_bot α) : x ⊓ y = min x y :=
by rw [← inf_eq_min, lattice_eq_DLO]
@[norm_cast] -- this is not marked simp because the corresponding with_top lemmas are used
lemma coe_min [linear_order α] (x y : α) : ((min x y : α) : with_bot α) = min x y :=
by simp [min, ite_cast]
@[norm_cast] -- this is not marked simp because the corresponding with_top lemmas are used
lemma coe_max [linear_order α] (x y : α) : ((max x y : α) : with_bot α) = max x y :=
by simp [max, ite_cast]
instance order_top [order_top α] : order_top (with_bot α) :=
{ top := some ⊤,
le_top := λ o a ha, by cases ha; exact ⟨_, rfl, le_top⟩,
..with_bot.partial_order }
instance bounded_lattice [bounded_lattice α] : bounded_lattice (with_bot α) :=
{ ..with_bot.lattice, ..with_bot.order_top, ..with_bot.order_bot }
lemma well_founded_lt [partial_order α] (h : well_founded ((<) : α → α → Prop)) :
well_founded ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) :=
have acc_bot : acc ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) ⊥ :=
acc.intro _ (λ a ha, (not_le_of_gt ha bot_le).elim),
⟨λ a, option.rec_on a acc_bot (λ a, acc.intro _ (λ b, option.rec_on b (λ _, acc_bot)
(λ b, well_founded.induction h b
(show ∀ b : α, (∀ c, c < b → (c : with_bot α) < a →
acc ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) c) → (b : with_bot α) < a →
acc ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) b,
from λ b ih hba, acc.intro _ (λ c, option.rec_on c (λ _, acc_bot)
(λ c hc, ih _ (some_lt_some.1 hc) (lt_trans hc hba)))))))⟩
instance densely_ordered [partial_order α] [densely_ordered α] [no_bot_order α] :
densely_ordered (with_bot α) :=
⟨ λ a b,
match a, b with
| a, none := λ h : a < ⊥, (not_lt_bot h).elim
| none, some b := λ h, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := no_bot b in ⟨a, bot_lt_coe a, coe_lt_coe.2 ha⟩
| some a, some b := λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := exists_between (coe_lt_coe.1 h) in
⟨a, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₁, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₂⟩
end⟩
end with_bot
--TODO(Mario): Construct using order dual on with_bot
/-- Attach `⊤` to a type. -/
def with_top (α : Type*) := option α
namespace with_top
meta instance {α} [has_to_format α] : has_to_format (with_top α) :=
{ to_format := λ x,
match x with
| none := "⊤"
| (some x) := to_fmt x
end }
instance : has_coe_t α (with_top α) := ⟨some⟩
instance has_top : has_top (with_top α) := ⟨none⟩
instance : inhabited (with_top α) := ⟨⊤⟩
lemma none_eq_top : (none : with_top α) = (⊤ : with_top α) := rfl
lemma some_eq_coe (a : α) : (some a : with_top α) = (↑a : with_top α) := rfl
/-- Recursor for `with_top` using the preferred forms `⊤` and `↑a`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def rec_top_coe {C : with_top α → Sort*} (h₁ : C ⊤) (h₂ : Π (a : α), C a) :
Π (n : with_top α), C n :=
option.rec h₁ h₂
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {a b : α} : (a : with_top α) = b ↔ a = b :=
by rw [← option.some.inj_eq a b]; refl
@[simp] theorem top_ne_coe {a : α} : ⊤ ≠ (a : with_top α) .
@[simp] theorem coe_ne_top {a : α} : (a : with_top α) ≠ ⊤ .
@[priority 10]
instance has_lt [has_lt α] : has_lt (with_top α) :=
{ lt := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∃ b ∈ o₁, ∀ a ∈ o₂, b < a }
@[priority 10]
instance has_le [has_le α] : has_le (with_top α) :=
{ le := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∀ a ∈ o₂, ∃ b ∈ o₁, b ≤ a }
@[simp] theorem some_lt_some [has_lt α] {a b : α} :
@has_lt.lt (with_top α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a < b :=
by simp [(<)]
@[simp] theorem some_le_some [has_le α] {a b : α} :
@has_le.le (with_top α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simp [(≤)]
@[simp] theorem le_none [has_le α] {a : with_top α} :
@has_le.le (with_top α) _ a none :=
by simp [(≤)]
@[simp] theorem some_lt_none [has_lt α] {a : α} :
@has_lt.lt (with_top α) _ (some a) none :=
by simp [(<)]; existsi a; refl
instance : can_lift (with_top α) α :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := λ r, r ≠ ⊤,
prf := λ x hx, ⟨option.get $ option.ne_none_iff_is_some.1 hx, option.some_get _⟩ }
instance [preorder α] : preorder (with_top α) :=
{ le := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∀ a ∈ o₂, ∃ b ∈ o₁, b ≤ a,
lt := (<),
lt_iff_le_not_le := by { intros; cases a; cases b;
simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]; simp [(<),(≤)] },
le_refl := λ o a ha, ⟨a, ha, le_refl _⟩,
le_trans := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ c hc,
let ⟨b, hb, bc⟩ := h₂ c hc, ⟨a, ha, ab⟩ := h₁ b hb in
⟨a, ha, le_trans ab bc⟩,
}
instance partial_order [partial_order α] : partial_order (with_top α) :=
{ le_antisymm := λ o₁ o₂ h₁ h₂, begin
cases o₂ with b,
{ cases o₁ with a, {refl},
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩ },
{ rcases h₁ b rfl with ⟨a, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h₂'⟩,
rw le_antisymm h₁' h₂' }
end,
.. with_top.preorder }
instance order_top [partial_order α] : order_top (with_top α) :=
{ le_top := λ a a' h, option.no_confusion h,
..with_top.partial_order, .. with_top.has_top }
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_le_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
(a : with_top α) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by rcases h b rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩; exact h,
λ h a' e, option.some_inj.1 e ▸ ⟨a, rfl, h⟩⟩
theorem le_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
∀ {o : option α}, a ∈ o →
(@has_le.le (with_top α) _ o b ↔ a ≤ b)
| _ rfl := coe_le_coe
theorem le_coe_iff [partial_order α] {b : α} : ∀{x : with_top α}, x ≤ b ↔ (∃a:α, x = a ∧ a ≤ b)
| (some a) := by simp [some_eq_coe, coe_eq_coe]
| none := by simp [none_eq_top]
theorem coe_le_iff [partial_order α] {a : α} : ∀{x : with_top α}, ↑a ≤ x ↔ (∀b:α, x = ↑b → a ≤ b)
| (some b) := by simp [some_eq_coe, coe_eq_coe]
| none := by simp [none_eq_top]
theorem lt_iff_exists_coe [partial_order α] : ∀{a b : with_top α}, a < b ↔ (∃p:α, a = p ∧ ↑p < b)
| (some a) b := by simp [some_eq_coe, coe_eq_coe]
| none b := by simp [none_eq_top]
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_lt_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} : (a : with_top α) < b ↔ a < b := some_lt_some
lemma coe_lt_top [partial_order α] (a : α) : (a : with_top α) < ⊤ := some_lt_none
theorem coe_lt_iff [partial_order α] {a : α} : ∀{x : with_top α}, ↑a < x ↔ (∀b:α, x = ↑b → a < b)
| (some b) := by simp [some_eq_coe, coe_eq_coe, coe_lt_coe]
| none := by simp [none_eq_top, coe_lt_top]
lemma not_top_le_coe [partial_order α] (a : α) : ¬ (⊤:with_top α) ≤ ↑a :=
λ h, (lt_irrefl ⊤ (lt_of_le_of_lt h (coe_lt_top a))).elim
instance decidable_le [preorder α] [@decidable_rel α (≤)] : @decidable_rel (with_top α) (≤) :=
λ x y, @with_bot.decidable_le (order_dual α) _ _ y x
instance decidable_lt [has_lt α] [@decidable_rel α (<)] : @decidable_rel (with_top α) (<) :=
λ x y, @with_bot.decidable_lt (order_dual α) _ _ y x
instance [partial_order α] [is_total α (≤)] : is_total (with_top α) (≤) :=
{ total := λ a b, match a, b with
| none , _ := or.inr le_top
| _ , none := or.inl le_top
| some x, some y := by simp only [some_le_some, total_of]
end }
instance linear_order [linear_order α] : linear_order (with_top α) :=
{ le_total := λ o₁ o₂, begin
cases o₁ with a, {exact or.inr le_top},
cases o₂ with b, {exact or.inl le_top},
simp [le_total]
end,
decidable_le := with_top.decidable_le,
decidable_lt := with_top.decidable_lt,
..with_top.partial_order }
instance semilattice_inf [semilattice_inf α] : semilattice_inf_top (with_top α) :=
{ inf := option.lift_or_get (⊓),
inf_le_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₂; simp [option.lift_or_get],
inf_le_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₁; simp [option.lift_or_get],
le_inf := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases o₂ with b; cases o₃ with c; cases ha,
{ exact h₂ a rfl },
{ exact h₁ a rfl },
{ rcases h₁ b rfl with ⟨d, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
simp at h₂,
exact ⟨d, rfl, le_inf h₁' h₂⟩ }
end,
..with_top.order_top }
lemma coe_inf [semilattice_inf α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊓ b : α) : with_top α) = a ⊓ b := rfl
instance semilattice_sup [semilattice_sup α] : semilattice_sup_top (with_top α) :=
{ sup := λ o₁ o₂, o₁.bind (λ a, o₂.map (λ b, a ⊔ b)),
le_sup_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, le_sup_left⟩
end,
le_sup_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, le_sup_right⟩
end,
sup_le := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases ha,
rcases h₁ a rfl with ⟨b, ⟨⟩, ab⟩,
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨c, ⟨⟩, ac⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, sup_le ab ac⟩
end,
..with_top.order_top }
lemma coe_sup [semilattice_sup α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊔ b : α) : with_top α) = a ⊔ b := rfl
instance lattice [lattice α] : lattice (with_top α) :=
{ ..with_top.semilattice_sup, ..with_top.semilattice_inf }
theorem lattice_eq_DLO [linear_order α] :
lattice_of_linear_order = @with_top.lattice α _ :=
lattice.ext $ λ x y, iff.rfl
theorem sup_eq_max [linear_order α] (x y : with_top α) : x ⊔ y = max x y :=
by rw [← sup_eq_max, lattice_eq_DLO]
theorem inf_eq_min [linear_order α] (x y : with_top α) : x ⊓ y = min x y :=
by rw [← inf_eq_min, lattice_eq_DLO]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_min [linear_order α] (x y : α) : ((min x y : α) : with_top α) = min x y :=
by simp [min, ite_cast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_max [linear_order α] (x y : α) : ((max x y : α) : with_top α) = max x y :=
by simp [max, ite_cast]
instance order_bot [order_bot α] : order_bot (with_top α) :=
{ bot := some ⊥,
bot_le := λ o a ha, by cases ha; exact ⟨_, rfl, bot_le⟩,
..with_top.partial_order }
instance bounded_lattice [bounded_lattice α] : bounded_lattice (with_top α) :=
{ ..with_top.lattice, ..with_top.order_top, ..with_top.order_bot }
lemma well_founded_lt {α : Type*} [partial_order α] (h : well_founded ((<) : α → α → Prop)) :
well_founded ((<) : with_top α → with_top α → Prop) :=
have acc_some : ∀ a : α, acc ((<) : with_top α → with_top α → Prop) (some a) :=
λ a, acc.intro _ (well_founded.induction h a
(show ∀ b, (∀ c, c < b → ∀ d : with_top α, d < some c → acc (<) d) →
∀ y : with_top α, y < some b → acc (<) y,
from λ b ih c, option.rec_on c (λ hc, (not_lt_of_ge le_top hc).elim)
(λ c hc, acc.intro _ (ih _ (some_lt_some.1 hc))))),
⟨λ a, option.rec_on a (acc.intro _ (λ y, option.rec_on y (λ h, (lt_irrefl _ h).elim)
(λ _ _, acc_some _))) acc_some⟩
instance densely_ordered [partial_order α] [densely_ordered α] [no_top_order α] :
densely_ordered (with_top α) :=
⟨ λ a b,
match a, b with
| none, a := λ h : ⊤ < a, (not_top_lt h).elim
| some a, none := λ h, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := no_top a in ⟨b, coe_lt_coe.2 hb, coe_lt_top b⟩
| some a, some b := λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := exists_between (coe_lt_coe.1 h) in
⟨a, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₁, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₂⟩
end⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe_btwn [partial_order α] [densely_ordered α] [no_top_order α]
{a b : with_top α} :
(a < b) ↔ (∃ x : α, a < ↑x ∧ ↑x < b) :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_between h, ⟨x, hx⟩ := lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hy.2 in ⟨x, hx.1 ▸ hy⟩,
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, lt_trans hx.1 hx.2⟩
end with_top
/-! ### Subtype, order dual, product lattices -/
namespace subtype
/-- A subtype forms a `⊔`-`⊥`-semilattice if `⊥` and `⊔` preserve the property.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def semilattice_sup_bot [semilattice_sup_bot α] {P : α → Prop}
(Pbot : P ⊥) (Psup : ∀⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) : semilattice_sup_bot {x : α // P x} :=
{ bot := ⟨⊥, Pbot⟩,
bot_le := λ x, @bot_le α _ x,
..subtype.semilattice_sup Psup }
/-- A subtype forms a `⊓`-`⊥`-semilattice if `⊥` and `⊓` preserve the property.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def semilattice_inf_bot [semilattice_inf_bot α] {P : α → Prop}
(Pbot : P ⊥) (Pinf : ∀⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)) : semilattice_inf_bot {x : α // P x} :=
{ bot := ⟨⊥, Pbot⟩,
bot_le := λ x, @bot_le α _ x,
..subtype.semilattice_inf Pinf }
/-- A subtype forms a `⊔`-`⊤`-semilattice if `⊤` and `⊔` preserve the property.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def semilattice_sup_top [semilattice_sup_top α] {P : α → Prop}
(Ptop : P ⊤) (Psup : ∀{{x y}}, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) : semilattice_sup_top {x : α // P x} :=
{ top := ⟨⊤, Ptop⟩,
le_top := λ x, @le_top α _ x,
..subtype.semilattice_sup Psup }
/-- A subtype forms a `⊓`-`⊤`-semilattice if `⊤` and `⊓` preserve the property.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def semilattice_inf_top [semilattice_inf_top α] {P : α → Prop}
(Ptop : P ⊤) (Pinf : ∀{{x y}}, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)) : semilattice_inf_top {x : α // P x} :=
{ top := ⟨⊤, Ptop⟩,
le_top := λ x, @le_top α _ x,
..subtype.semilattice_inf Pinf }
end subtype
namespace order_dual
variable (α)
instance [has_bot α] : has_top (order_dual α) := ⟨(⊥ : α)⟩
instance [has_top α] : has_bot (order_dual α) := ⟨(⊤ : α)⟩
instance [order_bot α] : order_top (order_dual α) :=
{ le_top := @bot_le α _,
.. order_dual.partial_order α, .. order_dual.has_top α }
instance [order_top α] : order_bot (order_dual α) :=
{ bot_le := @le_top α _,
.. order_dual.partial_order α, .. order_dual.has_bot α }
instance [semilattice_inf_bot α] : semilattice_sup_top (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_sup α, .. order_dual.order_top α }
instance [semilattice_inf_top α] : semilattice_sup_bot (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_sup α, .. order_dual.order_bot α }
instance [semilattice_sup_bot α] : semilattice_inf_top (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_inf α, .. order_dual.order_top α }
instance [semilattice_sup_top α] : semilattice_inf_bot (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_inf α, .. order_dual.order_bot α }
instance [bounded_lattice α] : bounded_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.lattice α, .. order_dual.order_top α, .. order_dual.order_bot α }
/- If you define `distrib_lattice_top`, add the `order_dual` instances between `distrib_lattice_bot`
and `distrib_lattice_top` here -/
instance [bounded_distrib_lattice α] : bounded_distrib_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.bounded_lattice α, .. order_dual.distrib_lattice α }
end order_dual
namespace prod
variables (α β)
instance [has_top α] [has_top β] : has_top (α × β) := ⟨⟨⊤, ⊤⟩⟩
instance [has_bot α] [has_bot β] : has_bot (α × β) := ⟨⟨⊥, ⊥⟩⟩
instance [order_top α] [order_top β] : order_top (α × β) :=
{ le_top := λ a, ⟨le_top, le_top⟩,
.. prod.partial_order α β, .. prod.has_top α β }
instance [order_bot α] [order_bot β] : order_bot (α × β) :=
{ bot_le := λ a, ⟨bot_le, bot_le⟩,
.. prod.partial_order α β, .. prod.has_bot α β }
instance [semilattice_sup_top α] [semilattice_sup_top β] : semilattice_sup_top (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_sup α β, .. prod.order_top α β }
instance [semilattice_inf_top α] [semilattice_inf_top β] : semilattice_inf_top (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_inf α β, .. prod.order_top α β }
instance [semilattice_sup_bot α] [semilattice_sup_bot β] : semilattice_sup_bot (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_sup α β, .. prod.order_bot α β }
instance [semilattice_inf_bot α] [semilattice_inf_bot β] : semilattice_inf_bot (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_inf α β, .. prod.order_bot α β }
instance [bounded_lattice α] [bounded_lattice β] : bounded_lattice (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.lattice α β, .. prod.order_top α β, .. prod.order_bot α β }
instance [distrib_lattice_bot α] [distrib_lattice_bot β] :
distrib_lattice_bot (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.distrib_lattice α β, .. prod.order_bot α β }
instance [bounded_distrib_lattice α] [bounded_distrib_lattice β] :
bounded_distrib_lattice (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.bounded_lattice α β, .. prod.distrib_lattice α β }
end prod
/-! ### Disjointness and complements -/
section disjoint
section semilattice_inf_bot
variable [semilattice_inf_bot α]
/-- Two elements of a lattice are disjoint if their inf is the bottom element.
(This generalizes disjoint sets, viewed as members of the subset lattice.) -/
def disjoint (a b : α) : Prop := a ⊓ b ≤ ⊥
theorem disjoint.eq_bot {a b : α} (h : disjoint a b) : a ⊓ b = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 h
theorem disjoint_iff {a b : α} : disjoint a b ↔ a ⊓ b = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.symm
theorem disjoint.comm {a b : α} : disjoint a b ↔ disjoint b a :=
by rw [disjoint, disjoint, inf_comm]
@[symm] theorem disjoint.symm ⦃a b : α⦄ : disjoint a b → disjoint b a :=
disjoint.comm.1
@[simp] theorem disjoint_bot_left {a : α} : disjoint ⊥ a := inf_le_left
@[simp] theorem disjoint_bot_right {a : α} : disjoint a ⊥ := inf_le_right
theorem disjoint.mono {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
disjoint b d → disjoint a c := le_trans (inf_le_inf h₁ h₂)
theorem disjoint.mono_left {a b c : α} (h : a ≤ b) : disjoint b c → disjoint a c :=
disjoint.mono h (le_refl _)
theorem disjoint.mono_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≤ c) : disjoint a c → disjoint a b :=
disjoint.mono (le_refl _) h
@[simp] lemma disjoint_self {a : α} : disjoint a a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
by simp [disjoint]
lemma disjoint.ne {a b : α} (ha : a ≠ ⊥) (hab : disjoint a b) : a ≠ b :=
by { intro h, rw [←h, disjoint_self] at hab, exact ha hab }
lemma disjoint.eq_bot_of_le {a b : α} (hab : disjoint a b) (h : a ≤ b) : a = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 (by rwa ←inf_eq_left.2 h)
lemma disjoint.of_disjoint_inf_of_le {a b c : α} (h : disjoint (a ⊓ b) c) (hle : a ≤ c) :
disjoint a b := by rw [disjoint_iff, h.eq_bot_of_le (inf_le_left.trans hle)]
lemma disjoint.of_disjoint_inf_of_le' {a b c : α} (h : disjoint (a ⊓ b) c) (hle : b ≤ c) :
disjoint a b := by rw [disjoint_iff, h.eq_bot_of_le (inf_le_right.trans hle)]
end semilattice_inf_bot
section bounded_lattice
variables [bounded_lattice α] {a : α}
@[simp] theorem disjoint_top : disjoint a ⊤ ↔ a = ⊥ := by simp [disjoint_iff]
@[simp] theorem top_disjoint : disjoint ⊤ a ↔ a = ⊥ := by simp [disjoint_iff]
lemma eq_bot_of_disjoint_absorbs
{a b : α} (w : disjoint a b) (h : a ⊔ b = a) : b = ⊥ :=
begin
rw disjoint_iff at w,
rw [←w, right_eq_inf],
rwa sup_eq_left at h,
end
end bounded_lattice
section distrib_lattice_bot
variables [distrib_lattice_bot α] {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_sup_left : disjoint (a ⊔ b) c ↔ disjoint a c ∧ disjoint b c :=
by simp only [disjoint_iff, inf_sup_right, sup_eq_bot_iff]
@[simp] lemma disjoint_sup_right : disjoint a (b ⊔ c) ↔ disjoint a b ∧ disjoint a c :=
by simp only [disjoint_iff, inf_sup_left, sup_eq_bot_iff]
lemma disjoint.sup_left (ha : disjoint a c) (hb : disjoint b c) : disjoint (a ⊔ b) c :=
disjoint_sup_left.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma disjoint.sup_right (hb : disjoint a b) (hc : disjoint a c) : disjoint a (b ⊔ c) :=
disjoint_sup_right.2 ⟨hb, hc⟩
lemma disjoint.left_le_of_le_sup_right {a b c : α} (h : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hd : disjoint a c) : a ≤ b :=
(λ x, le_of_inf_le_sup_le x (sup_le h le_sup_right)) ((disjoint_iff.mp hd).symm ▸ bot_le)
lemma disjoint.left_le_of_le_sup_left {a b c : α} (h : a ≤ c ⊔ b) (hd : disjoint a c) : a ≤ b :=
@le_of_inf_le_sup_le _ _ a b c ((disjoint_iff.mp hd).symm ▸ bot_le)
((@sup_comm _ _ c b) ▸ (sup_le h le_sup_left))
end distrib_lattice_bot
section semilattice_inf_bot
variables [semilattice_inf_bot α] {a b : α} (c : α)
lemma disjoint.inf_left (h : disjoint a b) : disjoint (a ⊓ c) b :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
lemma disjoint.inf_left' (h : disjoint a b) : disjoint (c ⊓ a) b :=
h.mono_left inf_le_right
lemma disjoint.inf_right (h : disjoint a b) : disjoint a (b ⊓ c) :=
h.mono_right inf_le_left
lemma disjoint.inf_right' (h : disjoint a b) : disjoint a (c ⊓ b) :=
h.mono_right inf_le_right
end semilattice_inf_bot
end disjoint
section is_compl
/-- Two elements `x` and `y` are complements of each other if `x ⊔ y = ⊤` and `x ⊓ y = ⊥`. -/
structure is_compl [bounded_lattice α] (x y : α) : Prop :=
(inf_le_bot : x ⊓ y ≤ ⊥)
(top_le_sup : ⊤ ≤ x ⊔ y)
namespace is_compl
section bounded_lattice
variables [bounded_lattice α] {x y z : α}
protected lemma disjoint (h : is_compl x y) : disjoint x y := h.1
@[symm] protected lemma symm (h : is_compl x y) : is_compl y x :=
⟨by { rw inf_comm, exact h.1 }, by { rw sup_comm, exact h.2 }⟩
lemma of_eq (h₁ : x ⊓ y = ⊥) (h₂ : x ⊔ y = ⊤) : is_compl x y :=
⟨le_of_eq h₁, le_of_eq h₂.symm⟩
lemma inf_eq_bot (h : is_compl x y) : x ⊓ y = ⊥ := h.disjoint.eq_bot
lemma sup_eq_top (h : is_compl x y) : x ⊔ y = ⊤ := top_unique h.top_le_sup
lemma to_order_dual (h : is_compl x y) : @is_compl (order_dual α) _ x y := ⟨h.2, h.1⟩
end bounded_lattice
variables [bounded_distrib_lattice α] {x y z : α}
lemma inf_left_eq_bot_iff (h : is_compl y z) : x ⊓ y = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ z :=
inf_eq_bot_iff_le_compl h.sup_eq_top h.inf_eq_bot
lemma inf_right_eq_bot_iff (h : is_compl y z) : x ⊓ z = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ y :=
h.symm.inf_left_eq_bot_iff
lemma disjoint_left_iff (h : is_compl y z) : disjoint x y ↔ x ≤ z :=
by { rw disjoint_iff, exact h.inf_left_eq_bot_iff }
lemma disjoint_right_iff (h : is_compl y z) : disjoint x z ↔ x ≤ y :=
h.symm.disjoint_left_iff
lemma le_left_iff (h : is_compl x y) : z ≤ x ↔ disjoint z y :=
h.disjoint_right_iff.symm
lemma le_right_iff (h : is_compl x y) : z ≤ y ↔ disjoint z x :=
h.symm.le_left_iff
lemma left_le_iff (h : is_compl x y) : x ≤ z ↔ ⊤ ≤ z ⊔ y :=
h.to_order_dual.le_left_iff
lemma right_le_iff (h : is_compl x y) : y ≤ z ↔ ⊤ ≤ z ⊔ x :=
h.symm.left_le_iff
lemma antimono {x' y'} (h : is_compl x y) (h' : is_compl x' y') (hx : x ≤ x') :
y' ≤ y :=
h'.right_le_iff.2 $ le_trans h.symm.top_le_sup (sup_le_sup_left hx _)
lemma right_unique (hxy : is_compl x y) (hxz : is_compl x z) :
y = z :=
le_antisymm (hxz.antimono hxy $ le_refl x) (hxy.antimono hxz $ le_refl x)
lemma left_unique (hxz : is_compl x z) (hyz : is_compl y z) :
x = y :=
hxz.symm.right_unique hyz.symm
lemma sup_inf {x' y'} (h : is_compl x y) (h' : is_compl x' y') :
is_compl (x ⊔ x') (y ⊓ y') :=
of_eq
(by rw [inf_sup_right, ← inf_assoc, h.inf_eq_bot, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_left_comm,
h'.inf_eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
(by rw [sup_inf_left, @sup_comm _ _ x, sup_assoc, h.sup_eq_top, sup_top_eq, top_inf_eq,
sup_assoc, sup_left_comm, h'.sup_eq_top, sup_top_eq])
lemma inf_sup {x' y'} (h : is_compl x y) (h' : is_compl x' y') :
is_compl (x ⊓ x') (y ⊔ y') :=
(h.symm.sup_inf h'.symm).symm
end is_compl
lemma is_compl_bot_top [bounded_lattice α] : is_compl (⊥ : α) ⊤ :=
is_compl.of_eq bot_inf_eq sup_top_eq
lemma is_compl_top_bot [bounded_lattice α] : is_compl (⊤ : α) ⊥ :=
is_compl.of_eq inf_bot_eq top_sup_eq
section
variables [bounded_lattice α] {x : α}
lemma eq_top_of_is_compl_bot (h : is_compl x ⊥) : x = ⊤ :=
sup_bot_eq.symm.trans h.sup_eq_top
lemma eq_top_of_bot_is_compl (h : is_compl ⊥ x) : x = ⊤ :=
eq_top_of_is_compl_bot h.symm
lemma eq_bot_of_is_compl_top (h : is_compl x ⊤) : x = ⊥ :=
eq_top_of_is_compl_bot h.to_order_dual
lemma eq_bot_of_top_is_compl (h : is_compl ⊤ x) : x = ⊥ :=
eq_top_of_bot_is_compl h.to_order_dual
end
/-- A complemented bounded lattice is one where every element has a (not necessarily unique)
complement. -/
class is_complemented (α) [bounded_lattice α] : Prop :=
(exists_is_compl : ∀ (a : α), ∃ (b : α), is_compl a b)
export is_complemented (exists_is_compl)
namespace is_complemented
variables [bounded_lattice α] [is_complemented α]
instance : is_complemented (order_dual α) :=
⟨λ a, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_is_compl (show α, from a) in ⟨b, hb.to_order_dual⟩⟩
end is_complemented
end is_compl
section nontrivial
variables [bounded_lattice α] [nontrivial α]
lemma bot_ne_top : (⊥ : α) ≠ ⊤ :=
λ H, not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mpr (subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top H) ‹_›
lemma top_ne_bot : (⊤ : α) ≠ ⊥ := ne.symm bot_ne_top
end nontrivial
namespace bool
-- Could be generalised to `bounded_distrib_lattice` and `is_complemented`
instance : bounded_lattice bool :=
{ top := tt,
le_top := λ x, le_tt,
bot := ff,
bot_le := λ x, ff_le,
.. (infer_instance : lattice bool)}
end bool
section bool
@[simp] lemma top_eq_tt : ⊤ = tt := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_ff : ⊥ = ff := rfl
end bool
|
8df75e6deb13d6e642d8399e8b1737f710d6cdd0 | 12dabd587ce2621d9a4eff9f16e354d02e206c8e | /world05/level04.lean | 75f7874cbe10b809582172983c1e0b1dc1a8d74f | [] | no_license | abdelq/natural-number-game | a1b5b8f1d52625a7addcefc97c966d3f06a48263 | bbddadc6d2e78ece2e9acd40fa7702ecc2db75c2 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,606,478,691 | 1,594,175,058,000 | 1,594,175,058,000 | 278,673,209 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 159 | lean | example (P Q R S T U: Type)
(p : P)
(h : P → Q)
(i : Q → R)
(j : Q → T)
(k : S → T)
(l : T → U)
: U :=
begin
apply l,
apply j,
apply h,
exact p,
end
|
1de6ae31af8d467ba161d9f0a517add1c47b1452 | 5756a081670ba9c1d1d3fca7bd47cb4e31beae66 | /Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Tactic/Mathlib/Squeeze.lean | 5035ee2dff1f008794b070acdec9655051a09546 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathport | 2c9bdc8292168febf59799efdc5451dbf0450d4a | 13051f68064f7638970d39a8fecaede68ffbf9e1 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,841,364,079 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 379,357,010 | 27 | 10 | Apache-2.0 | 1,691,309,132,000 | 1,624,384,521,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,105 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Basic
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Lean3
open Lean
namespace Mathport.Translate.Tactic
open Mathport.Translate.Parser
-- # tactic.simpa
def trSimpaCore (autoUnfold trace : Bool) (parseCfg : TacM (Option (Spanned AST3.Expr))) :
TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let o := optTk (← parse onlyFlag)
let hs ← trSimpArgs (← parse simpArgList)
let attrs := (← parse (tk "with" *> ident*)?).getD #[]
let hs := (hs ++ attrs.map trSimpExt).asNonempty
let e ← liftM $ (← parse (tk "using" *> pExpr)?).mapM trExpr
let (cfg, disch) ← parseSimpConfig (← parseCfg)
let cfg ← mkConfigStx? (cfg.bind quoteSimpConfig)
let rest ← `(Std.Tactic.Simpa.simpaArgsRest|
$[$cfg:config]? $(disch)? $[only%$o]? $[[$hs,*]]? $[using $e]?)
match autoUnfold, trace with
| true, true => `(tactic| simpa?! $rest)
| false, true => `(tactic| simpa? $rest)
| true, false => `(tactic| simpa! $rest)
| false, false => `(tactic| simpa $rest)
@[tr_tactic simpa] def trSimpa : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let unfold ← parse (tk "!")?; let squeeze ← parse (tk "?")?
trSimpaCore unfold.isSome squeeze.isSome expr?
-- # tactic.squeeze
@[tr_tactic squeeze_scope] def trSqueezeScope : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
`(tactic| squeeze_scope $(← trBlock (← itactic)):tacticSeq)
@[tr_tactic squeeze_simp] def trSqueezeSimp : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let _ques ← parse (pure ()) <* parse (tk "?")?; let bang ← parse (tk "!")?
trSimpCore bang.isSome true
@[tr_tactic squeeze_simpa] def trSqueezeSimpa : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let _ques ← parse (pure ()) <* parse (tk "?")?; let bang ← parse (tk "!")?
trSimpaCore bang.isSome true expr?
@[tr_tactic squeeze_dsimp] def trSqueezeDSimp : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let _ques ← parse (pure ()) <* parse (tk "?")?; let bang ← parse (tk "!")?
trDSimpCore bang.isSome true (return (← parse (structInst)?).map .dummy)
|
c42492f1ef8b53b53de0f1ee73c55f71fc4256be | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/916.lean | 7223b859ab955e7da587edaaaa46d2196cf4984a | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 64 | lean | example : Id Nat := do
let mut x := 1
have x : Nat := 2
x
|
da3897debdba03d73f5a95f3e4f8d23793f2444b | 42610cc2e5db9c90269470365e6056df0122eaa0 | /hott/cubical/pathover2.hlean | e0a41b123f96c321347d7fe7cf9d59465b7e3752 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tomsib2001/lean | 2ab59bfaebd24a62109f800dcf4a7139ebd73858 | eb639a7d53fb40175bea5c8da86b51d14bb91f76 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,128,387,740 | 1,468,968,950,000 | 1,468,968,950,000 | 61,027,234 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,465,813,585,000 | 1,465,813,585,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,975 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Coherence conditions for operations on pathovers
-/
open function equiv
namespace eq
variables {A A' A'' : Type} {B B' : A → Type} {B'' : A' → Type} {C : Π⦃a⦄, B a → Type}
{a a₂ a₃ a₄ : A} {p p' p'' : a = a₂} {p₂ p₂' : a₂ = a₃} {p₃ : a₃ = a₄} {p₁₃ : a = a₃}
{a' : A'}
{b b' : B a} {b₂ b₂' : B a₂} {b₃ : B a₃} {b₄ : B a₄}
{c : C b} {c₂ : C b₂}
definition pathover_ap_id (q : b =[p] b₂) : pathover_ap B id q = change_path (ap_id p)⁻¹ q :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition pathover_ap_compose (B : A'' → Type) (g : A' → A'') (f : A → A')
{b : B (g (f a))} {b₂ : B (g (f a₂))} (q : b =[p] b₂) : pathover_ap B (g ∘ f) q
= change_path (ap_compose g f p)⁻¹ (pathover_ap B g (pathover_ap (B ∘ g) f q)) :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition pathover_ap_compose_rev (B : A'' → Type) (g : A' → A'') (f : A → A')
{b : B (g (f a))} {b₂ : B (g (f a₂))} (q : b =[p] b₂) :
pathover_ap B g (pathover_ap (B ∘ g) f q)
= change_path (ap_compose g f p) (pathover_ap B (g ∘ f) q) :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition pathover_of_tr_eq_idp (r : b = b') : pathover_of_tr_eq r = pathover_idp_of_eq r :=
idp
definition pathover_of_tr_eq_eq_concato (r : p ▸ b = b₂)
: pathover_of_tr_eq r = pathover_tr p b ⬝o pathover_idp_of_eq r :=
by induction r; induction p; reflexivity
definition apo011_eq_apo11_apd (f : Πa, B a → A') (p : a = a₂) (q : b =[p] b₂)
: apo011 f p q = eq_of_pathover (apo11 (apd f p) q) :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition change_path_con (q : p = p') (q' : p' = p'') (r : b =[p] b₂) :
change_path (q ⬝ q') r = change_path q' (change_path q r) :=
by induction q; induction q'; reflexivity
definition change_path_invo (q : p = p') (r : b =[p] b₂) :
change_path (inverse2 q) r⁻¹ᵒ = (change_path q r)⁻¹ᵒ :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition change_path_cono (q : p = p') (q₂ : p₂ = p₂') (r : b =[p] b₂) (r₂ : b₂ =[p₂] b₃):
change_path (q ◾ q₂) (r ⬝o r₂) = change_path q r ⬝o change_path q₂ r₂ :=
by induction q; induction q₂; reflexivity
definition pathover_of_pathover_ap_invo (B' : A' → Type) (f : A → A')
{b : B' (f a)} {b₂ : B' (f a₂)} (q : b =[ap f p] b₂) :
pathover_of_pathover_ap B' f (change_path (ap_inv f p)⁻¹ q⁻¹ᵒ) =
(pathover_of_pathover_ap B' f q)⁻¹ᵒ:=
by induction p; eapply idp_rec_on q; reflexivity
definition pathover_of_pathover_ap_cono (B' : A' → Type) (f : A → A')
{b : B' (f a)} {b₂ : B' (f a₂)} {b₃ : B' (f a₃)} (q : b =[ap f p] b₂) (q₂ : b₂ =[ap f p₂] b₃) :
pathover_of_pathover_ap B' f (change_path (ap_con f p p₂)⁻¹ (q ⬝o q₂)) =
pathover_of_pathover_ap B' f q ⬝o pathover_of_pathover_ap B' f q₂ :=
by induction p; induction p₂; eapply idp_rec_on q; eapply idp_rec_on q₂; reflexivity
definition pathover_ap_pathover_of_pathover_ap (P : A'' → Type) (g : A' → A'') (f : A → A')
{p : a = a₂} {b : P (g (f a))} {b₂ : P (g (f a₂))} (q : b =[ap f p] b₂) :
pathover_ap P (g ∘ f) (pathover_of_pathover_ap (P ∘ g) f q) =
change_path (ap_compose g f p)⁻¹ (pathover_ap P g q) :=
by induction p; eapply (idp_rec_on q); reflexivity
definition change_path_pathover_of_pathover_ap (B' : A' → Type) (f : A → A') {p p' : a = a₂}
(r : p = p') {b : B' (f a)} {b₂ : B' (f a₂)} (q : b =[ap f p] b₂) :
change_path r (pathover_of_pathover_ap B' f q) =
pathover_of_pathover_ap B' f (change_path (ap02 f r) q) :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition pathover_ap_change_path (B' : A' → Type) (f : A → A') {p p' : a = a₂}
(r : p = p') {b : B' (f a)} {b₂ : B' (f a₂)} (q : b =[p] b₂) :
pathover_ap B' f (change_path r q) = change_path (ap02 f r) (pathover_ap B' f q) :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition change_path_equiv [constructor] (b : B a) (b₂ : B a₂) (q : p = p')
: (b =[p] b₂) ≃ (b =[p'] b₂) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact change_path q},
{ exact change_path q⁻¹},
{ intro r, induction q, reflexivity},
{ intro r, induction q, reflexivity},
end
definition apd_ap {B : A' → Type} (g : Πb, B b) (f : A → A') (p : a = a₂)
: apd g (ap f p) = pathover_ap B f (apd (λx, g (f x)) p) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition apd_eq_apd_ap {B : A' → Type} (g : Πb, B b) (f : A → A') (p : a = a₂)
: apd (λx, g (f x)) p = pathover_of_pathover_ap B f (apd g (ap f p)) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ap_compose_ap02_constant {A B C : Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a') (b : B) (c : C) :
ap_compose (λc, b) (λa, c) p ⬝ ap02 (λc, b) (ap_constant p c) = ap_constant p b :=
by induction p; reflexivity
theorem apd_constant (b : B'' a') (p : a = a) :
pathover_ap B'' (λa, a') (apd (λa, b) p) = change_path (ap_constant p a')⁻¹ idpo :=
begin
rewrite [apd_eq_apd_ap _ _ p],
let y := !change_path_of_pathover (apd (apd id) (ap_constant p b))⁻¹ᵒ,
rewrite -y, esimp,
refine !pathover_ap_pathover_of_pathover_ap ⬝ _,
rewrite pathover_ap_change_path,
rewrite -change_path_con, apply ap (λx, change_path x idpo),
unfold ap02, rewrite [ap_inv,-con_inv], apply inverse2,
apply ap_compose_ap02_constant
end
definition apd_change_path {B : A → Type} {a a₂ : A} (f : Πa, B a) {p p' : a = a₂} (s : p = p')
: apd f p' = change_path s (apd f p) :=
by induction s; reflexivity
definition cono_invo_eq_idpo {q q' : b =[p] b₂} (r : q = q')
: change_path (con.right_inv p) (q ⬝o q'⁻¹ᵒ) = idpo :=
by induction r; induction q; reflexivity
end eq
|
3abb5de7f3f20351a26c52c36da1bcf7f3d5c9f0 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/analysis/calculus/parametric_integral.lean | be34d75e7fda7ea2068f4bf4a24e615c6cbe9844 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,566 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import measure_theory.integral.set_integral
import analysis.calculus.mean_value
/-!
# Derivatives of integrals depending on parameters
A parametric integral is a function with shape `f = λ x : H, ∫ a : α, F x a ∂μ` for some
`F : H → α → E`, where `H` and `E` are normed spaces and `α` is a measured space with measure `μ`.
We already know from `continuous_of_dominated` in `measure_theory.integral.bochner` how to
guarantee that `f` is continuous using the dominated convergence theorem. In this file,
we want to express the derivative of `f` as the integral of the derivative of `F` with respect
to `x`.
## Main results
As explained above, all results express the derivative of a parametric integral as the integral of
a derivative. The variations come from the assumptions and from the different ways of expressing
derivative, especially Fréchet derivatives vs elementary derivative of function of one real
variable.
* `has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip`: this version assumes
`F x` is ae-measurable for x near `x₀`, `F x₀` is integrable,
`λ x, F x a` has derivative `F' a : H →L[ℝ] E` at `x₀` which is ae-measurable,
`λ x, F x a` is locally Lipschitz near `x₀` for almost every `a`, with a Lipschitz bound which
is integrable with respect to `a`. A subtle point is that the "near x₀" in the last condition
has to be uniform in `a`. This is controlled by a positive number `ε`.
* `has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le`: this version assume `λ x, F x a` has derivative
`F' x a` for `x` near `x₀` and `F' x` is bounded by an integrable function independent from
`x` near `x₀`.
`has_deriv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip` and `has_deriv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_deriv_le ` are versions
of the above two results that assume `H = ℝ` and use the high-school derivative `deriv` instead of
Fréchet derivative `fderiv`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open topological_space measure_theory filter metric
open_locale topological_space filter
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
[complete_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
[measurable_space E] [borel_space E]
{H : Type*} [normed_group H] [normed_space ℝ H]
[second_countable_topology $ H →L[ℝ] E]
/-- Differentiation under integral of `x ↦ ∫ F x a` at a given point `x₀`, assuming
`F x₀` is integrable, `x ↦ F x a` is locally Lipschitz on a ball around `x₀` for ae `a` with
integrable Lipschitz bound (with a ball radius independent of `a`), and `F x` is
ae-measurable for `x` in the same ball. See `has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip` for a
slightly more general version. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip' {F : H → α → E} {F' : α → (H →L[ℝ] E)} {x₀ : H}
{bound : α → ℝ}
{ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, ae_measurable (F x) μ)
(hF_int : integrable (F x₀) μ)
(hF'_meas : ae_measurable F' μ)
(h_lipsch : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, lipschitz_on_with (real.nnabs $ bound a) (λ x, F x a) (ball x₀ ε))
(bound_integrable : integrable (bound : α → ℝ) μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, has_fderiv_at (λ x, F x a) (F' a) x₀) :
integrable F' μ ∧ has_fderiv_at (λ x, ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) x₀ :=
begin
have x₀_in : x₀ ∈ ball x₀ ε := mem_ball_self ε_pos,
have nneg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ := λ x, inv_nonneg.mpr (norm_nonneg _) ,
set b : α → ℝ := λ a, |bound a|,
have b_int : integrable b μ := bound_integrable.norm,
have b_nonneg : ∀ a, 0 ≤ b a := λ a, abs_nonneg _,
have hF_int' : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, integrable (F x) μ,
{ intros x x_in,
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F x₀ a - F x a∥ ≤ ε * ∥(bound a : ℝ)∥,
{ apply h_lipsch.mono,
intros a ha,
rw lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le at ha,
apply (ha x₀ x₀_in x x_in).trans,
rw [mul_comm, real.coe_nnabs, real.norm_eq_abs],
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, norm_sub_rev] at x_in,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_of_lt x_in) (abs_nonneg _) },
exact integrable_of_norm_sub_le (hF_meas x x_in) hF_int
(integrable.const_mul bound_integrable.norm ε) this },
have hF'_int : integrable F' μ,
{ have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F' a∥ ≤ b a,
{ apply (h_diff.and h_lipsch).mono,
rintros a ⟨ha_diff, ha_lip⟩,
exact ha_diff.le_of_lip (ball_mem_nhds _ ε_pos) ha_lip },
exact b_int.mono' hF'_meas this },
refine ⟨hF'_int, _⟩,
have h_ball: ball x₀ ε ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := ball_mem_nhds x₀ ε_pos,
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀,
∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ * ∥∫ a, F x a ∂μ - ∫ a, F x₀ a ∂μ - (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) (x - x₀)∥ =
∥∫ a, ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀)) ∂μ∥,
{ apply mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ ε_pos),
intros x x_in,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, ← norm_smul_of_nonneg (nneg _), integral_smul,
integral_sub, integral_sub, ← continuous_linear_map.integral_apply hF'_int],
exacts [hF_int' x x_in, hF_int, (hF_int' x x_in).sub hF_int,
hF'_int.apply_continuous_linear_map _] },
rw [has_fderiv_at_iff_tendsto, tendsto_congr' this, ← tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
← show ∫ (a : α), ∥x₀ - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x₀ a - F x₀ a - (F' a) (x₀ - x₀)) ∂μ = 0, by simp],
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence,
{ apply is_countably_generated_nhds },
{ filter_upwards [h_ball],
intros x x_in,
apply ae_measurable.const_smul,
exact ((hF_meas _ x_in).sub (hF_meas _ x₀_in)).sub (hF'_meas.apply_continuous_linear_map _) },
{ simp [measurable_const] },
{ apply mem_of_superset h_ball,
intros x hx,
apply (h_diff.and h_lipsch).mono,
rintros a ⟨ha_deriv, ha_bound⟩,
show ∥∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))∥ ≤ b a + ∥F' a∥,
replace ha_bound : ∥F x a - F x₀ a∥ ≤ b a * ∥x - x₀∥,
{ rw lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le at ha_bound,
exact ha_bound _ hx _ x₀_in },
calc ∥∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))∥
= ∥∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a) - ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • F' a (x - x₀)∥ : by rw smul_sub
... ≤ ∥∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a)∥ + ∥∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • F' a (x - x₀)∥ : norm_sub_le _ _
... = ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ * ∥F x a - F x₀ a∥ + ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ * ∥F' a (x - x₀)∥ :
by { rw [norm_smul_of_nonneg, norm_smul_of_nonneg] ; exact nneg _}
... ≤ ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ * (b a * ∥x - x₀∥) + ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ * (∥F' a∥ * ∥x - x₀∥) : add_le_add _ _
... ≤ b a + ∥F' a∥ : _,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ha_bound (nneg _),
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((F' a).le_op_norm _) (nneg _),
by_cases h : ∥x - x₀∥ = 0,
{ simpa [h] using add_nonneg (b_nonneg a) (norm_nonneg (F' a)) },
{ field_simp [h] } },
{ exact b_int.add hF'_int.norm },
{ apply h_diff.mono,
intros a ha,
suffices : tendsto (λ x, ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))) (𝓝 x₀) (𝓝 0),
by simpa,
rw tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
have : (λ x, ∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ * ∥F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀)∥) =
λ x, ∥∥x - x₀∥⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))∥,
{ ext x,
rw norm_smul_of_nonneg (nneg _) },
rwa [has_fderiv_at_iff_tendsto, this] at ha },
end
/-- Differentiation under integral of `x ↦ ∫ F x a` at a given point `x₀`, assuming
`F x₀` is integrable, `x ↦ F x a` is locally Lipschitz on a ball around `x₀` for ae `a`
(with a ball radius independent of `a`) with integrable Lipschitz bound, and `F x` is ae-measurable
for `x` in a possibly smaller neighborhood of `x₀`. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip {F : H → α → E} {F' : α → (H →L[ℝ] E)} {x₀ : H}
{bound : α → ℝ}
{ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ae_measurable (F x) μ)
(hF_int : integrable (F x₀) μ)
(hF'_meas : ae_measurable F' μ)
(h_lip : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, lipschitz_on_with (real.nnabs $ bound a) (λ x, F x a) (ball x₀ ε))
(bound_integrable : integrable (bound : α → ℝ) μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, has_fderiv_at (λ x, F x a) (F' a) x₀) :
integrable F' μ ∧ has_fderiv_at (λ x, ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) x₀ :=
begin
obtain ⟨ε', ε'_pos, h'⟩ : ∃ ε' > 0, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε', ae_measurable (F x) μ,
by simpa using nhds_basis_ball.eventually_iff.mp hF_meas,
set δ := min ε ε',
have δ_pos : 0 < δ := lt_min ε_pos ε'_pos,
replace h' : ∀ x, x ∈ ball x₀ δ → ae_measurable (F x) μ,
{ intros x x_in,
exact h' _ (ball_subset_ball (min_le_right ε ε') x_in) },
replace h_lip : ∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, lipschitz_on_with (real.nnabs $ bound a) (λ x, F x a) (ball x₀ δ),
{ apply h_lip.mono,
intros a lip,
exact lip.mono (ball_subset_ball $ min_le_left ε ε') },
apply has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip' δ_pos ; assumption
end
/-- Differentiation under integral of `x ↦ ∫ F x a` at a given point `x₀`, assuming
`F x₀` is integrable, `x ↦ F x a` is differentiable on a ball around `x₀` for ae `a` with
derivative norm uniformly bounded by an integrable function (the ball radius is independent of `a`),
and `F x` is ae-measurable for `x` in a possibly smaller neighborhood of `x₀`. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le {F : H → α → E} {F' : H → α → (H →L[ℝ] E)} {x₀ : H}
{bound : α → ℝ}
{ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ae_measurable (F x) μ)
(hF_int : integrable (F x₀) μ)
(hF'_meas : ae_measurable (F' x₀) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, ∥F' x a∥ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : integrable (bound : α → ℝ) μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, has_fderiv_at (λ x, F x a) (F' x a) x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' x₀ a ∂μ) x₀ :=
begin
have x₀_in : x₀ ∈ ball x₀ ε := mem_ball_self ε_pos,
have diff_x₀ : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, has_fderiv_at (λ x, F x a) (F' x₀ a) x₀ :=
h_diff.mono (λ a ha, ha x₀ x₀_in),
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, lipschitz_on_with (real.nnabs (bound a)) (λ x, F x a) (ball x₀ ε),
{ apply (h_diff.and h_bound).mono,
rintros a ⟨ha_deriv, ha_bound⟩,
refine (convex_ball _ _).lipschitz_on_with_of_nnnorm_has_fderiv_within_le
(λ x x_in, (ha_deriv x x_in).has_fderiv_within_at) (λ x x_in, _),
rw [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm, real.coe_nnabs],
exact (ha_bound x x_in).trans (le_abs_self _) },
exact (has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip ε_pos hF_meas hF_int
hF'_meas this bound_integrable diff_x₀).2
end
/-- Derivative under integral of `x ↦ ∫ F x a` at a given point `x₀ : ℝ`, assuming
`F x₀` is integrable, `x ↦ F x a` is locally Lipschitz on an interval around `x₀` for ae `a`
(with interval radius independent of `a`) with integrable Lipschitz bound, and `F x` is
ae-measurable for `x` in a possibly smaller neighborhood of `x₀`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip {F : ℝ → α → E} {F' : α → E} {x₀ : ℝ}
{ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ae_measurable (F x) μ)
(hF_int : integrable (F x₀) μ)
(hF'_meas : ae_measurable F' μ) {bound : α → ℝ}
(h_lipsch : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, lipschitz_on_with (real.nnabs $ bound a) (λ x, F x a) (ball x₀ ε))
(bound_integrable : integrable (bound : α → ℝ) μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, has_deriv_at (λ x, F x a) (F' a) x₀) :
(integrable F' μ) ∧ has_deriv_at (λ x, ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) x₀ :=
begin
have hm := (continuous_linear_map.smul_rightL ℝ ℝ E 1).continuous.measurable.comp_ae_measurable
hF'_meas,
cases has_fderiv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip ε_pos hF_meas hF_int hm h_lipsch bound_integrable
h_diff with hF'_int key,
replace hF'_int : integrable F' μ,
{ rw [← integrable_norm_iff hm] at hF'_int,
simpa only [integrable_norm_iff, hF'_meas, one_mul, norm_one,
continuous_linear_map.norm_smul_rightL_apply] using hF'_int},
refine ⟨hF'_int, _⟩,
simp_rw has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at at h_diff ⊢,
rwa continuous_linear_map.integral_comp_comm _ hF'_int at key,
all_goals { apply_instance, },
end
/-- Derivative under integral of `x ↦ ∫ F x a` at a given point `x₀ : ℝ`, assuming
`F x₀` is integrable, `x ↦ F x a` is differentiable on an interval around `x₀` for ae `a`
(with interval radius independent of `a`) with derivative uniformly bounded by an integrable
function, and `F x` is ae-measurable for `x` in a possibly smaller neighborhood of `x₀`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_deriv_le {F : ℝ → α → E} {F' : ℝ → α → E} {x₀ : ℝ}
{ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ae_measurable (F x) μ)
(hF_int : integrable (F x₀) μ)
(hF'_meas : ae_measurable (F' x₀) μ)
{bound : α → ℝ}
(h_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, ∥F' x a∥ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : integrable bound μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, has_deriv_at (λ x, F x a) (F' x a) x) :
(integrable (F' x₀) μ) ∧ has_deriv_at (λn, ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' x₀ a ∂μ) x₀ :=
begin
have x₀_in : x₀ ∈ ball x₀ ε := mem_ball_self ε_pos,
have diff_x₀ : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, has_deriv_at (λ x, F x a) (F' x₀ a) x₀ :=
h_diff.mono (λ a ha, ha x₀ x₀_in),
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, lipschitz_on_with (real.nnabs (bound a)) (λ (x : ℝ), F x a) (ball x₀ ε),
{ apply (h_diff.and h_bound).mono,
rintros a ⟨ha_deriv, ha_bound⟩,
refine (convex_ball _ _).lipschitz_on_with_of_nnnorm_has_deriv_within_le
(λ x x_in, (ha_deriv x x_in).has_deriv_within_at) (λ x x_in, _),
rw [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm, real.coe_nnabs],
exact (ha_bound x x_in).trans (le_abs_self _) },
exact has_deriv_at_of_dominated_loc_of_lip ε_pos hF_meas hF_int hF'_meas this
bound_integrable diff_x₀
end
|
3539c505069b85e24747816b943894f3ef95a6eb | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/sig6.lean | 620d7b1be9f8fa1516ce0c257cd2c6dde48ca47e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 510 | lean | variables A B : (Type U)
variables t1 t2 : A ⨯ B
axiom pair_Ax {A : (Type U)} {B : A → (Type U)} (p : sig x, B x) : (pair (proj1 p) (proj2 p) : sig x, B x) = p
theorem spairext {A B : (Type U)} {p1 p2 : A ⨯ B} (H1 : proj1 p1 = proj1 p2) (H2 : proj2 p1 = proj2 p2) : p1 = p2
:= calc p1 = (pair (proj1 p1) (proj2 p1)) : symm (pair_Ax p1)
... = (pair (proj1 p2) (proj2 p1)) : { H1 }
... = (pair (proj1 p2) (proj2 p2)) : { H2 }
... = p2 : pair_Ax p2 |
a39632f81dc9dd5571d572df644e69459801c2dd | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /tests/lean/run/calcBug.lean | f04caf586bac34bdb682b86d9eb6061ab4573018 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 328 | lean | namespace Hidden
open Nat
theorem zero_add (n : Nat) : 0 + n = n :=
Nat.recOn (motive := fun x => 0 + x = x)
n
(show 0 + 0 = 0 from rfl)
(fun (n : Nat) (ih : 0 + n = n) =>
show 0 + succ n = succ n from
calc
0 + succ n = succ (0 + n) := rfl
_ = succ n := by rw [ih])
end Hidden
|
cebbf1141ff1c2402bb3d81a433ee394c2b99590 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/group_theory/group_action/prod.lean | 22232fa2d0a0fc49c6b628b11e737b7d4cfac8db | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,242 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Patrick Massot, Eric Wieser
-/
import algebra.group.prod
import group_theory.group_action.defs
/-!
# Prod instances for additive and multiplicative actions
This file defines instances for binary product of additive and multiplicative actions and provides
scalar multiplication as a homomorphism from `α × β` to `β`.
## Main declarations
* `smul_mul_hom`/`smul_monoid_hom`: Scalar multiplication bundled as a multiplicative/monoid
homomorphism.
## See also
* `group_theory.group_action.option`
* `group_theory.group_action.pi`
* `group_theory.group_action.sigma`
* `group_theory.group_action.sum`
-/
variables {M N P E α β : Type*}
namespace prod
section
variables [has_smul M α] [has_smul M β] [has_smul N α] [has_smul N β] (a : M) (x : α × β)
@[to_additive prod.has_vadd] instance : has_smul M (α × β) := ⟨λa p, (a • p.1, a • p.2)⟩
@[simp, to_additive] theorem smul_fst : (a • x).1 = a • x.1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] theorem smul_snd : (a • x).2 = a • x.2 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] theorem smul_mk (a : M) (b : α) (c : β) : a • (b, c) = (a • b, a • c) := rfl
@[to_additive] theorem smul_def (a : M) (x : α × β) : a • x = (a • x.1, a • x.2) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] theorem smul_swap : (a • x).swap = a • x.swap := rfl
lemma smul_zero_mk {α : Type*} [monoid M] [add_monoid α] [distrib_mul_action M α] (a : M) (c : β) :
a • ((0 : α), c) = (0, a • c) :=
by rw [prod.smul_mk, smul_zero]
lemma smul_mk_zero {β : Type*} [monoid M] [add_monoid β] [distrib_mul_action M β] (a : M) (b : α) :
a • (b, (0 : β)) = (a • b, 0) :=
by rw [prod.smul_mk, smul_zero]
variables [has_pow α E] [has_pow β E]
@[to_additive has_smul] instance has_pow : has_pow (α × β) E :=
{ pow := λ p c, (p.1 ^ c, p.2 ^ c) }
@[simp, to_additive smul_snd, to_additive_reorder 6]
lemma pow_fst (p : α × β) (c : E) : (p ^ c).fst = p.fst ^ c := rfl
@[simp, to_additive smul_snd, to_additive_reorder 6]
lemma pow_snd (p : α × β) (c : E) : (p ^ c).snd = p.snd ^ c := rfl
/- Note that the `c` arguments to this lemmas cannot be in the more natural right-most positions due
to limitations in `to_additive` and `to_additive_reorder`, which will silently fail to reorder more
than two adjacent arguments -/
@[simp, to_additive smul_mk, to_additive_reorder 6]
lemma pow_mk (c : E) (a : α) (b : β) : (prod.mk a b) ^ c = prod.mk (a ^ c) (b ^ c) := rfl
@[to_additive smul_def, to_additive_reorder 6]
lemma pow_def (p : α × β) (c : E) : p ^ c = (p.1 ^ c, p.2 ^ c) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive smul_swap, to_additive_reorder 6]
lemma pow_swap (p : α × β) (c : E) : (p ^ c).swap = p.swap ^ c := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance [has_smul M N] [is_scalar_tower M N α] [is_scalar_tower M N β] :
is_scalar_tower M N (α × β) :=
⟨λ x y z, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_assoc _ _ _, smul_assoc _ _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive] instance [smul_comm_class M N α] [smul_comm_class M N β] :
smul_comm_class M N (α × β) :=
{ smul_comm := λ r s x, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_comm _ _ _, smul_comm _ _ _⟩ }
@[to_additive]
instance [has_smul Mᵐᵒᵖ α] [has_smul Mᵐᵒᵖ β] [is_central_scalar M α] [is_central_scalar M β] :
is_central_scalar M (α × β) :=
⟨λ r m, prod.ext (op_smul_eq_smul _ _) (op_smul_eq_smul _ _)⟩
@[to_additive]
instance has_faithful_smul_left [has_faithful_smul M α] [nonempty β] :
has_faithful_smul M (α × β) :=
⟨λ x y h, let ⟨b⟩ := ‹nonempty β› in eq_of_smul_eq_smul $ λ a : α, by injection h (a, b)⟩
@[to_additive]
instance has_faithful_smul_right [nonempty α] [has_faithful_smul M β] :
has_faithful_smul M (α × β) :=
⟨λ x y h, let ⟨a⟩ := ‹nonempty α› in eq_of_smul_eq_smul $ λ b : β, by injection h (a, b)⟩
end
@[to_additive]
instance smul_comm_class_both [has_mul N] [has_mul P] [has_smul M N] [has_smul M P]
[smul_comm_class M N N] [smul_comm_class M P P] :
smul_comm_class M (N × P) (N × P) :=
⟨λ c x y, by simp [smul_def, mul_def, mul_smul_comm]⟩
instance is_scalar_tower_both [has_mul N] [has_mul P] [has_smul M N] [has_smul M P]
[is_scalar_tower M N N] [is_scalar_tower M P P] :
is_scalar_tower M (N × P) (N × P) :=
⟨λ c x y, by simp [smul_def, mul_def, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
@[to_additive] instance {m : monoid M} [mul_action M α] [mul_action M β] : mul_action M (α × β) :=
{ mul_smul := λ a₁ a₂ p, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨mul_smul _ _ _, mul_smul _ _ _⟩,
one_smul := λ ⟨b, c⟩, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨one_smul _ _, one_smul _ _⟩ }
instance {R M N : Type*} [has_zero M] [has_zero N]
[smul_zero_class R M] [smul_zero_class R N] : smul_zero_class R (M × N) :=
{ smul_zero := λ a, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_zero _, smul_zero _⟩ }
instance {R M N : Type*} [add_zero_class M] [add_zero_class N]
[distrib_smul R M] [distrib_smul R N] : distrib_smul R (M × N) :=
{ smul_add := λ a p₁ p₂, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_add _ _ _, smul_add _ _ _⟩ }
instance {R M N : Type*} {r : monoid R} [add_monoid M] [add_monoid N]
[distrib_mul_action R M] [distrib_mul_action R N] : distrib_mul_action R (M × N) :=
{ ..prod.distrib_smul }
instance {R M N : Type*} {r : monoid R} [monoid M] [monoid N]
[mul_distrib_mul_action R M] [mul_distrib_mul_action R N] : mul_distrib_mul_action R (M × N) :=
{ smul_mul := λ a p₁ p₂, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_mul' _ _ _, smul_mul' _ _ _⟩,
smul_one := λ a, mk.inj_iff.mpr ⟨smul_one _, smul_one _⟩ }
end prod
/-! ### Scalar multiplication as a homomorphism -/
section bundled_smul
/-- Scalar multiplication as a multiplicative homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def smul_mul_hom [monoid α] [has_mul β] [mul_action α β] [is_scalar_tower α β β]
[smul_comm_class α β β] :
(α × β) →ₙ* β :=
{ to_fun := λ a, a.1 • a.2,
map_mul' := λ a b, (smul_mul_smul _ _ _ _).symm }
/-- Scalar multiplication as a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def smul_monoid_hom [monoid α] [mul_one_class β] [mul_action α β] [is_scalar_tower α β β]
[smul_comm_class α β β] :
α × β →* β :=
{ map_one' := one_smul _ _,
.. smul_mul_hom }
end bundled_smul
|
1139766dd2e9cd7c78c341b283f876f3c1492688 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/number_theory/pythagorean_triples.lean | 05eb3f7193fc8df26550f70161d10028639b4ce3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,775 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Paul van Wamelen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul van Wamelen
-/
import algebra.field.basic
import ring_theory.int.basic
import algebra.group_with_zero.power
import tactic.ring
import tactic.ring_exp
import tactic.field_simp
import data.zmod.basic
/-!
# Pythagorean Triples
The main result is the classification of Pythagorean triples. The final result is for general
Pythagorean triples. It follows from the more interesting relatively prime case. We use the
"rational parametrization of the circle" method for the proof. The parametrization maps the point
`(x / z, y / z)` to the slope of the line through `(-1 , 0)` and `(x / z, y / z)`. This quickly
shows that `(x / z, y / z) = (2 * m * n / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2), (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))` where
`m / n` is the slope. In order to identify numerators and denominators we now need results showing
that these are coprime. This is easy except for the prime 2. In order to deal with that we have to
analyze the parity of `x`, `y`, `m` and `n` and eliminate all the impossible cases. This takes up
the bulk of the proof below.
-/
lemma sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : zmod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 :=
begin
change fin 4 at z,
fin_cases z; norm_num [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_bit0, fin.coe_bit1]
end
lemma int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : (z * z) % 4 ≠ 2 :=
suffices ¬ (z * z) % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ), by norm_num at this,
begin
rw ← zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff',
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
end
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
/-- Three integers `x`, `y`, and `z` form a Pythagorean triple if `x * x + y * y = z * z`. -/
def pythagorean_triple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop := x * x + y * y = z * z
/-- Pythagorean triples are interchangable, i.e `x * x + y * y = y * y + x * x = z * z`.
This comes from additive commutativity. -/
lemma pythagorean_triple_comm {x y z : ℤ} :
(pythagorean_triple x y z) ↔ (pythagorean_triple y x z) :=
by { delta pythagorean_triple, rw add_comm }
/-- The zeroth Pythagorean triple is all zeros. -/
lemma pythagorean_triple.zero : pythagorean_triple 0 0 0 :=
by simp only [pythagorean_triple, zero_mul, zero_add]
namespace pythagorean_triple
variables {x y z : ℤ} (h : pythagorean_triple x y z)
include h
lemma eq : x * x + y * y = z * z := h
@[symm]
lemma symm :
pythagorean_triple y x z :=
by rwa [pythagorean_triple_comm]
/-- A triple is still a triple if you multiply `x`, `y` and `z`
by a constant `k`. -/
lemma mul (k : ℤ) : pythagorean_triple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc (k * x) * (k * x) + (k * y) * (k * y)
= k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) : by ring
... = k ^ 2 * (z * z) : by rw h.eq
... = (k * z) * (k * z) : by ring
omit h
/-- `(k*x, k*y, k*z)` is a Pythagorean triple if and only if
`(x, y, z)` is also a triple. -/
lemma mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
pythagorean_triple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ pythagorean_triple x y z :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, h.mul k⟩,
simp only [pythagorean_triple],
intro h,
rw ← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk),
convert h using 1; ring,
end
include h
/-- A Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is “classified” if there exist integers `k, m, n` such that
either
* `x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)` and `y = k * (2 * m * n)`, or
* `x = k * (2 * m * n)` and `y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)`. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments] def is_classified := ∃ (k m n : ℤ),
((x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n))
∨ (x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)))
∧ int.gcd m n = 1
/-- A primitive pythogorean triple `x, y, z` is a pythagorean triple with `x` and `y` coprime.
Such a triple is “primitively classified” if there exist coprime integers `m, n` such that either
* `x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2` and `y = 2 * m * n`, or
* `x = 2 * m * n` and `y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2`.
-/
@[nolint unused_arguments] def is_primitive_classified := ∃ (m n : ℤ),
((x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n)
∨ (x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2))
∧ int.gcd m n = 1
∧ ((m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1) ∨ (m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0))
lemma mul_is_classified (k : ℤ) (hc : h.is_classified) : (h.mul k).is_classified :=
begin
obtain ⟨l, m, n, ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co⟩⟩ := hc,
{ use [k * l, m, n], apply and.intro _ co, left, split; ring },
{ use [k * l, m, n], apply and.intro _ co, right, split; ring },
end
lemma even_odd_of_coprime (hc : int.gcd x y = 1) :
(x % 2 = 0 ∧ y % 2 = 1) ∨ (x % 2 = 1 ∧ y % 2 = 0) :=
begin
cases int.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with hx hx;
cases int.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with hy hy,
{ -- x even, y even
exfalso,
apply nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (dec_trivial : 1 < 2) _ _ hc,
{ apply int.dvd_nat_abs_of_of_nat_dvd, apply int.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hx },
{ apply int.dvd_nat_abs_of_of_nat_dvd, apply int.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hy } },
{ left, exact ⟨hx, hy⟩ }, -- x even, y odd
{ right, exact ⟨hx, hy⟩ }, -- x odd, y even
{ -- x odd, y odd
exfalso,
obtain ⟨x0, y0, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ x0 y0, x = x0* 2 + 1 ∧ y = y0 * 2 + 1,
{ cases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (int.dvd_sub_of_mod_eq hx) with x0 hx2,
cases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (int.dvd_sub_of_mod_eq hy) with y0 hy2,
rw sub_eq_iff_eq_add at hx2 hy2, exact ⟨x0, y0, hx2, hy2⟩ },
apply int.sq_ne_two_mod_four z,
rw show z * z = 4 * (x0 * x0 + x0 + y0 * y0 + y0) + 2, by { rw ← h.eq, ring },
norm_num [int.add_mod] }
end
lemma gcd_dvd : (int.gcd x y : ℤ) ∣ z :=
begin
by_cases h0 : int.gcd x y = 0,
{ have hx : x = 0, { apply int.nat_abs_eq_zero.mp, apply nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0 },
have hy : y = 0, { apply int.nat_abs_eq_zero.mp, apply nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0 },
have hz : z = 0,
{ simpa only [pythagorean_triple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero, or_self] using h },
simp only [hz, dvd_zero], },
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) x0 y0, 0 < k ∧ int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
int.exists_gcd_one' (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
rw [int.gcd_mul_right, h2, int.nat_abs_of_nat, one_mul],
rw [← int.pow_dvd_pow_iff (dec_trivial : 0 < 2), sq z, ← h.eq],
rw (by ring : x0 * k * (x0 * k) + y0 * k * (y0 * k) = k ^ 2 * (x0 * x0 + y0 * y0)),
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
end
lemma normalize : pythagorean_triple (x / int.gcd x y) (y / int.gcd x y) (z / int.gcd x y) :=
begin
by_cases h0 : int.gcd x y = 0,
{ have hx : x = 0, { apply int.nat_abs_eq_zero.mp, apply nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0 },
have hy : y = 0, { apply int.nat_abs_eq_zero.mp, apply nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0 },
have hz : z = 0,
{ simpa only [pythagorean_triple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero, or_self] using h },
simp only [hx, hy, hz, int.zero_div], exact zero },
rcases h.gcd_dvd with ⟨z0, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) x0 y0, 0 < k ∧ int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
int.exists_gcd_one' (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
have hk : (k : ℤ) ≠ 0, { norm_cast, rwa pos_iff_ne_zero at k0 },
rw [int.gcd_mul_right, h2, int.nat_abs_of_nat, one_mul] at h ⊢,
rw [mul_comm x0, mul_comm y0, mul_iff k hk] at h,
rwa [int.mul_div_cancel _ hk, int.mul_div_cancel _ hk, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ hk],
end
lemma is_classified_of_is_primitive_classified (hp : h.is_primitive_classified) :
h.is_classified :=
begin
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := hp,
use [1, m, n],
rcases H with ⟨t, co, pp⟩,
rw [one_mul, one_mul],
exact ⟨t, co⟩,
end
lemma is_classified_of_normalize_is_primitive_classified
(hc : h.normalize.is_primitive_classified) : h.is_classified :=
begin
convert h.normalize.mul_is_classified (int.gcd x y)
(is_classified_of_is_primitive_classified h.normalize hc);
rw int.mul_div_cancel',
{ exact int.gcd_dvd_left x y },
{ exact int.gcd_dvd_right x y },
{ exact h.gcd_dvd }
end
lemma ne_zero_of_coprime (hc : int.gcd x y = 1) : z ≠ 0 :=
begin
suffices : 0 < z * z, { rintro rfl, norm_num at this },
rw [← h.eq, ← sq, ← sq],
have hc' : int.gcd x y ≠ 0, { rw hc, exact one_ne_zero },
cases int.ne_zero_of_gcd hc' with hxz hyz,
{ apply lt_add_of_pos_of_le (sq_pos_of_ne_zero x hxz) (sq_nonneg y) },
{ apply lt_add_of_le_of_pos (sq_nonneg x) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero y hyz) }
end
lemma is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_zero_left (hc : int.gcd x y = 1) (hx : x = 0) :
h.is_primitive_classified :=
begin
subst x,
change nat.gcd 0 (int.nat_abs y) = 1 at hc,
rw [nat.gcd_zero_left (int.nat_abs y)] at hc,
cases int.nat_abs_eq y with hy hy,
{ use [1, 0], rw [hy, hc, int.gcd_zero_right], norm_num },
{ use [0, 1], rw [hy, hc, int.gcd_zero_left], norm_num }
end
lemma coprime_of_coprime (hc : int.gcd x y = 1) : int.gcd y z = 1 :=
begin
by_contradiction H,
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpy, hpz⟩ := nat.prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H,
apply hp.not_dvd_one,
rw [← hc],
apply nat.dvd_gcd (int.prime.dvd_nat_abs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp _ _) hpy,
rw [sq, eq_sub_of_add_eq h],
rw [← int.coe_nat_dvd_left] at hpy hpz,
exact dvd_sub ((hpz).mul_right _) ((hpy).mul_right _),
end
end pythagorean_triple
section circle_equiv_gen
/-!
### A parametrization of the unit circle
For the classification of pythogorean triples, we will use a parametrization of the unit circle.
-/
variables {K : Type*} [field K]
/-- A parameterization of the unit circle that is useful for classifying Pythagorean triples.
(To be applied in the case where `K = ℚ`.) -/
def circle_equiv_gen (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x^2 ≠ 0) :
K ≃ {p : K × K // p.1^2 + p.2^2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1} :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨⟨2 * x / (1 + x^2), (1 - x^2) / (1 + x^2)⟩,
by { field_simp [hk x, div_pow], ring },
begin
simp only [ne.def, div_eq_iff (hk x), ←neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, one_mul, neg_add,
sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_inj],
simpa only [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, one_pow] using hk 1,
end⟩,
inv_fun := λ p, (p : K × K).1 / ((p : K × K).2 + 1),
left_inv := λ x,
begin
have h2 : (1 + 1 : K) = 2 := rfl,
have h3 : (2 : K) ≠ 0, { convert hk 1, rw [one_pow 2, h2] },
field_simp [hk x, h2, add_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_cancel'_right, mul_comm],
end,
right_inv := λ ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy, hy⟩,
begin
change x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 at hxy,
have h2 : y + 1 ≠ 0, { apply mt eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero, exact hy },
have h3 : (y + 1) ^ 2 + x ^ 2 = 2 * (y + 1),
{ rw [(add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm).symm], ring },
have h4 : (2 : K) ≠ 0, { convert hk 1, rw one_pow 2, refl },
simp only [prod.mk.inj_iff, subtype.mk_eq_mk],
split,
{ field_simp [h3], ring },
{ field_simp [h3], rw [← add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm], ring }
end }
@[simp] lemma circle_equiv_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x^2 ≠ 0) (x : K) :
(circle_equiv_gen hk x : K × K) = ⟨2 * x / (1 + x^2), (1 - x^2) / (1 + x^2)⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma circle_equiv_symm_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x^2 ≠ 0)
(v : {p : K × K // p.1^2 + p.2^2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1}) :
(circle_equiv_gen hk).symm v = (v : K × K).1 / ((v : K × K).2 + 1) := rfl
end circle_equiv_gen
private lemma coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : int.gcd m n = 1)
(hm : m % 2 = 0) (hn : n % 2 = 1) :
int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 :=
begin
by_contradiction H,
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := nat.prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H,
rw ← int.coe_nat_dvd_left at hp1 hp2,
have h2m : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * m ^ 2, { convert dvd_add hp2 hp1, ring },
have h2n : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * n ^ 2, { convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1, ring },
have hmc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ int.nat_abs m :=
prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2m,
have hnc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ int.nat_abs n :=
prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2n,
by_cases h2 : p = 2,
{ have h3 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 1, { norm_num [sq, int.add_mod, int.mul_mod, hm, hn] },
have h4 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 0, { apply int.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, rwa h2 at hp2 },
rw h4 at h3, exact zero_ne_one h3 },
{ apply hp.not_dvd_one,
rw ← h,
exact nat.dvd_gcd (or.resolve_left hmc h2) (or.resolve_left hnc h2), }
end
private lemma coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : int.gcd m n = 1)
(hm : m % 2 = 1) (hn : n % 2 = 0):
int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 :=
begin
rw [int.gcd, ← int.nat_abs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)],
rw [(by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2), add_comm],
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd _ hn hm, rwa [int.gcd_comm],
end
private lemma coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : int.gcd m n = 1)
(hm : m % 2 = 0) (hn : n % 2 = 1) :
int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 :=
begin
by_contradiction H,
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := nat.prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H,
rw ← int.coe_nat_dvd_left at hp1 hp2,
have hnp : ¬ (p : ℤ) ∣ int.gcd m n,
{ rw h, norm_cast, exact mt nat.dvd_one.mp (nat.prime.ne_one hp) },
cases int.prime.dvd_mul hp hp2 with hp2m hpn,
{ rw int.nat_abs_mul at hp2m,
cases (nat.prime.dvd_mul hp).mp hp2m with hp2 hpm,
{ have hp2' : p = 2 := (nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two hp2).antisymm hp.two_le,
revert hp1, rw hp2',
apply mt int.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd,
norm_num [sq, int.sub_mod, int.mul_mod, hm, hn] },
apply mt (int.dvd_gcd (int.coe_nat_dvd_left.mpr hpm)) hnp,
apply (or_self _).mp, apply int.prime.dvd_mul' hp,
rw (by ring : n * n = - (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) + m * m),
apply dvd_add (dvd_neg_of_dvd hp1),
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (int.coe_nat_dvd_left.mpr hpm) m },
rw int.gcd_comm at hnp,
apply mt (int.dvd_gcd (int.coe_nat_dvd_left.mpr hpn)) hnp,
apply (or_self _).mp, apply int.prime.dvd_mul' hp,
rw (by ring : m * m = (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) + n * n),
apply dvd_add hp1,
exact (int.coe_nat_dvd_left.mpr hpn).mul_right n
end
private lemma coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : int.gcd m n = 1)
(hm : m % 2 = 1) (hn : n % 2 = 0) :
int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 :=
begin
rw [int.gcd, ← int.nat_abs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)],
rw [(by ring : 2 * m * n = 2 * n * m), (by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2)],
apply coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd _ hn hm, rwa [int.gcd_comm]
end
private lemma coprime_sq_sub_mul {m n : ℤ} (h : int.gcd m n = 1)
(hmn : (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1) ∨ (m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)) :
int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 :=
begin
cases hmn with h1 h2,
{ exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd h h1.left h1.right },
{ exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even h h2.left h2.right }
end
private lemma coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : int.gcd m n = 1)
(hm : m % 2 = 1) (hn : n % 2 = 1) :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2
∧ 2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2
∧ ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) % 2 = 0
∧ int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 :=
begin
cases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (int.dvd_sub_of_mod_eq hm) with m0 hm2,
cases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (int.dvd_sub_of_mod_eq hn) with n0 hn2,
rw sub_eq_iff_eq_add at hm2 hn2, subst m, subst n,
have h1 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 + (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 + n0 ^ 2 + m0 + n0) + 1),
by ring_exp,
have h2 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 - n0 ^ 2 + m0 - n0)),
by ring_exp,
have h3 : ((m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0,
{ rw [h2, int.mul_div_cancel_left, int.mul_mod_right], exact dec_trivial },
refine ⟨⟨_, h1⟩, ⟨_, h2⟩, h3, _⟩,
have h20 : (2:ℤ) ≠ 0 := dec_trivial,
rw [h1, h2, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ h20, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ h20],
by_contra h4,
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := nat.prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp h4,
apply hp.not_dvd_one,
rw ← h,
rw ← int.coe_nat_dvd_left at hp1 hp2,
apply nat.dvd_gcd,
{ apply int.prime.dvd_nat_abs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp,
convert dvd_add hp1 hp2, ring_exp },
{ apply int.prime.dvd_nat_abs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp,
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1, ring_exp },
end
namespace pythagorean_triple
variables {x y z : ℤ} (h : pythagorean_triple x y z)
include h
lemma is_primitive_classified_aux (hc : x.gcd y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z)
{m n : ℤ} (hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)
(hv2 : (x : ℚ) / z = 2 * m * n / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))
(hw2 : (y : ℚ) / z = (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))
(H : int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1)
(co : int.gcd m n = 1)
(pp : (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1) ∨ (m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)):
h.is_primitive_classified :=
begin
have hz : z ≠ 0, apply ne_of_gt hzpos,
have h2 : y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2,
{ apply rat.div_int_inj hzpos hm2n2 (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) H, rw [hw2], norm_cast },
use [m, n], apply and.intro _ (and.intro co pp), right,
refine ⟨_, h2.left⟩,
rw [← rat.coe_int_inj _ _, ← div_left_inj' ((mt (rat.coe_int_inj z 0).mp) hz), hv2, h2.right],
norm_cast
end
theorem is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos
(hc : int.gcd x y = 1) (hyo : y % 2 = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z) :
h.is_primitive_classified :=
begin
by_cases h0 : x = 0, { exact h.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_zero_left hc h0 },
let v := (x : ℚ) / z,
let w := (y : ℚ) / z,
have hz : z ≠ 0, apply ne_of_gt hzpos,
have hq : v ^ 2 + w ^ 2 = 1,
{ field_simp [hz, sq], norm_cast, exact h },
have hvz : v ≠ 0, { field_simp [hz], exact h0 },
have hw1 : w ≠ -1,
{ contrapose! hvz with hw1,
rw [hw1, neg_sq, one_pow, add_left_eq_self] at hq,
exact pow_eq_zero hq, },
have hQ : ∀ x : ℚ, 1 + x^2 ≠ 0,
{ intro q, apply ne_of_gt, exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le zero_lt_one (sq_nonneg q) },
have hp : (⟨v, w⟩ : ℚ × ℚ) ∈ {p : ℚ × ℚ | p.1^2 + p.2^2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1} := ⟨hq, hw1⟩,
let q := (circle_equiv_gen hQ).symm ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩,
have ht4 : v = 2 * q / (1 + q ^ 2) ∧ w = (1 - q ^ 2) / (1 + q ^ 2),
{ apply prod.mk.inj,
have := ((circle_equiv_gen hQ).apply_symm_apply ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩).symm,
exact congr_arg subtype.val this, },
let m := (q.denom : ℤ),
let n := q.num,
have hm0 : m ≠ 0, { norm_cast, apply rat.denom_ne_zero q },
have hq2 : q = n / m := (rat.num_div_denom q).symm,
have hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2,
{ apply lt_add_of_pos_of_le _ (sq_nonneg n),
exact lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg m) (ne.symm (pow_ne_zero 2 hm0)) },
have hw2 : w = (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2),
{ rw [ht4.2, hq2], field_simp [hm2n2, rat.denom_ne_zero q, -rat.num_div_denom] },
have hm2n20 : (m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2 ≠ 0,
{ norm_cast, simpa only [int.coe_nat_pow] using ne_of_gt hm2n2 },
have hv2 : v = 2 * m * n / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2),
{ apply eq.symm, apply (div_eq_iff hm2n20).mpr, rw [ht4.1], field_simp [hQ q],
rw [hq2] {occs := occurrences.pos [2, 3]},
field_simp [rat.denom_ne_zero q, -rat.num_div_denom],
ring },
have hnmcp : int.gcd n m = 1 := q.cop,
have hmncp : int.gcd m n = 1, { rw int.gcd_comm, exact hnmcp },
cases int.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one m with hm2 hm2;
cases int.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with hn2 hn2,
{ -- m even, n even
exfalso,
have h1 : 2 ∣ (int.gcd n m : ℤ),
{ exact int.dvd_gcd (int.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hn2) (int.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hm2) },
rw hnmcp at h1, revert h1, norm_num },
{ -- m even, n odd
apply h.is_primitive_classified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp,
{ apply or.intro_left, exact and.intro hm2 hn2 },
{ apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd hmncp hm2 hn2 } },
{ -- m odd, n even
apply h.is_primitive_classified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp,
{ apply or.intro_right, exact and.intro hm2 hn2 },
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even hmncp hm2 hn2 },
{ -- m odd, n odd
exfalso,
have h1 : 2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧ 2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2
∧ ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) % 2 = 0 ∧ int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1,
{ exact coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd hmncp hm2 hn2 },
have h2 : y = (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 ∧ z = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2,
{ apply rat.div_int_inj hzpos _ (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) h1.2.2.2,
{ show w = _, rw [←rat.mk_eq_div, ←(rat.div_mk_div_cancel_left (by norm_num : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0))],
rw [int.div_mul_cancel h1.1, int.div_mul_cancel h1.2.1, hw2], norm_cast },
{ apply (mul_lt_mul_right (by norm_num : 0 < (2 : ℤ))).mp,
rw [int.div_mul_cancel h1.1, zero_mul], exact hm2n2 } },
rw [h2.1, h1.2.2.1] at hyo,
revert hyo,
norm_num }
end
theorem is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_pos (hc : int.gcd x y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z):
h.is_primitive_classified :=
begin
cases h.even_odd_of_coprime hc with h1 h2,
{ exact (h.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h1.right hzpos) },
rw int.gcd_comm at hc,
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := (h.symm.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h2.left hzpos),
use [m, n], tauto
end
theorem is_primitive_classified_of_coprime (hc : int.gcd x y = 1) : h.is_primitive_classified :=
begin
by_cases hz : 0 < z,
{ exact h.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_pos hc hz },
have h' : pythagorean_triple x y (-z),
{ simpa [pythagorean_triple, neg_mul_neg] using h.eq, },
apply h'.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime_of_pos hc,
apply lt_of_le_of_ne _ (h'.ne_zero_of_coprime hc).symm,
exact le_neg.mp (not_lt.mp hz)
end
theorem classified : h.is_classified :=
begin
by_cases h0 : int.gcd x y = 0,
{ have hx : x = 0, { apply int.nat_abs_eq_zero.mp, apply nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0 },
have hy : y = 0, { apply int.nat_abs_eq_zero.mp, apply nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0 },
use [0, 1, 0], norm_num [hx, hy], },
apply h.is_classified_of_normalize_is_primitive_classified,
apply h.normalize.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime,
apply int.gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
end
omit h
theorem coprime_classification :
pythagorean_triple x y z ∧ int.gcd x y = 1 ↔
∃ m n, ((x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n) ∨
(x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2))
∧ (z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∨ z = - (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))
∧ int.gcd m n = 1
∧ ((m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1) ∨ (m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := h.left.is_primitive_classified_of_coprime h.right,
use [m, n],
rcases H with ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co, pp⟩,
{ refine ⟨or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _, co, pp⟩,
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2,
{ rw [sq, ← h.left.eq], ring },
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this },
{ refine ⟨or.inr ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _, co, pp⟩,
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2,
{ rw [sq, ← h.left.eq], ring },
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this } },
{ delta pythagorean_triple,
rintro ⟨m, n, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl | rfl, co, pp⟩;
{ split, { ring }, exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp }
<|>
{ split, { ring }, rw int.gcd_comm, exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp } }
end
/-- by assuming `x` is odd and `z` is positive we get a slightly more precise classification of
the pythagorean triple `x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = z ^ 2`-/
theorem coprime_classification' {x y z : ℤ} (h : pythagorean_triple x y z)
(h_coprime : int.gcd x y = 1) (h_parity : x % 2 = 1) (h_pos : 0 < z) :
∃ m n, x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2
∧ y = 2 * m * n
∧ z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2
∧ int.gcd m n = 1
∧ ((m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1) ∨ (m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0))
∧ 0 ≤ m :=
begin
obtain ⟨m, n, ht1, ht2, ht3, ht4⟩ :=
pythagorean_triple.coprime_classification.mp (and.intro h h_coprime),
cases le_or_lt 0 m with hm hm,
{ use [m, n],
cases ht1 with h_odd h_even,
{ apply and.intro h_odd.1,
apply and.intro h_odd.2,
cases ht2 with h_pos h_neg,
{ apply and.intro h_pos (and.intro ht3 (and.intro ht4 hm)) },
{ exfalso, revert h_pos, rw h_neg,
exact imp_false.mpr (not_lt.mpr (neg_nonpos.mpr (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg m)
(sq_nonneg n)))) } },
exfalso,
rcases h_even with ⟨rfl, -⟩,
rw [mul_assoc, int.mul_mod_right] at h_parity,
exact zero_ne_one h_parity },
{ use [-m, -n],
cases ht1 with h_odd h_even,
{ rw [neg_sq m],
rw [neg_sq n],
apply and.intro h_odd.1,
split, { rw h_odd.2, ring },
cases ht2 with h_pos h_neg,
{ apply and.intro h_pos,
split,
{ delta int.gcd, rw [int.nat_abs_neg, int.nat_abs_neg], exact ht3 },
{ rw [int.neg_mod_two, int.neg_mod_two],
apply and.intro ht4, linarith } },
{ exfalso, revert h_pos, rw h_neg,
exact imp_false.mpr (not_lt.mpr (neg_nonpos.mpr (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg m)
(sq_nonneg n)))) } },
exfalso,
rcases h_even with ⟨rfl, -⟩,
rw [mul_assoc, int.mul_mod_right] at h_parity,
exact zero_ne_one h_parity }
end
/-- **Formula for Pythagorean Triples** -/
theorem classification :
pythagorean_triple x y z ↔
∃ k m n, ((x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n)) ∨
(x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)))
∧ (z = k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ∨ z = - k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
obtain ⟨k, m, n, H⟩ := h.classified,
use [k, m, n],
rcases H with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
{ refine ⟨or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _⟩,
have : z ^ 2 = (k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) ^ 2,
{ rw [sq, ← h.eq], ring },
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this },
{ refine ⟨or.inr ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _⟩,
have : z ^ 2 = (k * (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) ^ 2,
{ rw [sq, ← h.eq], ring },
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this } },
{ rintro ⟨k, m, n, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl | rfl⟩;
delta pythagorean_triple; ring }
end
end pythagorean_triple
|
212387112ec7a2d91f150a6bea5e86a7adcab16c | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/analysis/locally_convex/with_seminorms.lean | 3f1cba49ad904110c2987b79d953980d077c0ab1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,682 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import analysis.seminorm
import analysis.locally_convex.bounded
/-!
# Topology induced by a family of seminorms
## Main definitions
* `seminorm_family.basis_sets`: The set of open seminorm balls for a family of seminorms.
* `seminorm_family.module_filter_basis`: A module filter basis formed by the open balls.
* `seminorm.is_bounded`: A linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is bounded iff every seminorm in `F` can be
bounded by a finite number of seminorms in `E`.
## Main statements
* `continuous_from_bounded`: A bounded linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is continuous.
* `seminorm_family.to_locally_convex_space`: A space equipped with a family of seminorms is locally
convex.
## TODO
Show that for any locally convex space there exist seminorms that induce the topology.
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex
-/
open normed_field set seminorm topological_space
open_locale big_operators nnreal pointwise topological_space
variables {𝕜 E F G ι ι' : Type*}
section filter_basis
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E]
variables (𝕜 E ι)
/-- An abbreviation for indexed families of seminorms. This is mainly to allow for dot-notation. -/
abbreviation seminorm_family := ι → seminorm 𝕜 E
variables {𝕜 E ι}
namespace seminorm_family
/-- The sets of a filter basis for the neighborhood filter of 0. -/
def basis_sets (p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι) : set (set E) :=
⋃ (s : finset ι) r (hr : 0 < r), singleton $ ball (s.sup p) (0 : E) r
variables (p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι)
lemma basis_sets_iff {U : set E} :
U ∈ p.basis_sets ↔ ∃ (i : finset ι) r (hr : 0 < r), U = ball (i.sup p) 0 r :=
by simp only [basis_sets, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff]
lemma basis_sets_mem (i : finset ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
(i.sup p).ball 0 r ∈ p.basis_sets :=
(basis_sets_iff _).mpr ⟨i,_,hr,rfl⟩
lemma basis_sets_singleton_mem (i : ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
(p i).ball 0 r ∈ p.basis_sets :=
(basis_sets_iff _).mpr ⟨{i},_,hr, by rw finset.sup_singleton⟩
lemma basis_sets_nonempty [nonempty ι] : p.basis_sets.nonempty :=
begin
let i := classical.arbitrary ι,
refine set.nonempty_def.mpr ⟨(p i).ball 0 1, _⟩,
exact p.basis_sets_singleton_mem i zero_lt_one,
end
lemma basis_sets_intersect
(U V : set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets) (hV : V ∈ p.basis_sets) :
∃ (z : set E) (H : z ∈ p.basis_sets), z ⊆ U ∩ V :=
begin
classical,
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r₁, hr₁, hU⟩,
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hV with ⟨t, r₂, hr₂, hV⟩,
use ((s ∪ t).sup p).ball 0 (min r₁ r₂),
refine ⟨p.basis_sets_mem (s ∪ t) (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩), _⟩,
rw [hU, hV, ball_finset_sup_eq_Inter _ _ _ (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩),
ball_finset_sup_eq_Inter _ _ _ hr₁, ball_finset_sup_eq_Inter _ _ _ hr₂],
exact set.subset_inter
(set.Inter₂_mono' $ λ i hi, ⟨i, finset.subset_union_left _ _ hi, ball_mono $ min_le_left _ _⟩)
(set.Inter₂_mono' $ λ i hi, ⟨i, finset.subset_union_right _ _ hi, ball_mono $
min_le_right _ _⟩),
end
lemma basis_sets_zero (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets) :
(0 : E) ∈ U :=
begin
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨ι', r, hr, hU⟩,
rw [hU, mem_ball_zero, map_zero],
exact hr,
end
lemma basis_sets_add (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets) :
∃ (V : set E) (H : V ∈ p.basis_sets), V + V ⊆ U :=
begin
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩,
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r/2),
refine ⟨p.basis_sets_mem s (div_pos hr zero_lt_two), _⟩,
refine set.subset.trans (ball_add_ball_subset (s.sup p) (r/2) (r/2) 0 0) _,
rw [hU, add_zero, add_halves'],
end
lemma basis_sets_neg (U) (hU' : U ∈ p.basis_sets) :
∃ (V : set E) (H : V ∈ p.basis_sets), V ⊆ (λ (x : E), -x) ⁻¹' U :=
begin
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU' with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩,
rw [hU, neg_preimage, neg_ball (s.sup p), neg_zero],
exact ⟨U, hU', eq.subset hU⟩,
end
/-- The `add_group_filter_basis` induced by the filter basis `seminorm_basis_zero`. -/
protected def add_group_filter_basis [nonempty ι] : add_group_filter_basis E :=
add_group_filter_basis_of_comm p.basis_sets p.basis_sets_nonempty
p.basis_sets_intersect p.basis_sets_zero p.basis_sets_add p.basis_sets_neg
lemma basis_sets_smul_right (v : E) (U : set E)
(hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets) : ∀ᶠ (x : 𝕜) in 𝓝 0, x • v ∈ U :=
begin
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩,
rw [hU, filter.eventually_iff],
simp_rw [(s.sup p).mem_ball_zero, (s.sup p).smul],
by_cases h : 0 < (s.sup p) v,
{ simp_rw (lt_div_iff h).symm,
rw ←_root_.ball_zero_eq,
exact metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (div_pos hr h) },
simp_rw [le_antisymm (not_lt.mp h) ((s.sup p).nonneg v), mul_zero, hr],
exact is_open.mem_nhds is_open_univ (mem_univ 0),
end
variables [nonempty ι]
lemma basis_sets_smul (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets) :
∃ (V : set 𝕜) (H : V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜)) (W : set E)
(H : W ∈ p.add_group_filter_basis.sets), V • W ⊆ U :=
begin
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩,
refine ⟨metric.ball 0 r.sqrt, metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), _⟩,
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r.sqrt, p.basis_sets_mem s (real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), _⟩,
refine set.subset.trans (ball_smul_ball (s.sup p) r.sqrt r.sqrt) _,
rw [hU, real.mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt hr)],
end
lemma basis_sets_smul_left (x : 𝕜) (U : set E)
(hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets) : ∃ (V : set E)
(H : V ∈ p.add_group_filter_basis.sets), V ⊆ (λ (y : E), x • y) ⁻¹' U :=
begin
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩,
rw hU,
by_cases h : x ≠ 0,
{ rw [(s.sup p).smul_ball_preimage 0 r x h, smul_zero],
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / ∥x∥),
exact ⟨p.basis_sets_mem s (div_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)), subset.rfl⟩ },
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r, p.basis_sets_mem s hr, _⟩,
simp only [not_ne_iff.mp h, subset_def, mem_ball_zero, hr, mem_univ, map_zero,
implies_true_iff, preimage_const_of_mem, zero_smul],
end
/-- The `module_filter_basis` induced by the filter basis `seminorm_basis_zero`. -/
protected def module_filter_basis : module_filter_basis 𝕜 E :=
{ to_add_group_filter_basis := p.add_group_filter_basis,
smul' := p.basis_sets_smul,
smul_left' := p.basis_sets_smul_left,
smul_right' := p.basis_sets_smul_right }
lemma filter_eq_infi (p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι) :
p.module_filter_basis.to_filter_basis.filter = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, _) _,
{ rw p.module_filter_basis.to_filter_basis.has_basis.le_basis_iff
(metric.nhds_basis_ball.comap _),
intros ε hε,
refine ⟨(p i).ball 0 ε, _, _⟩,
{ rw ← (finset.sup_singleton : _ = p i),
exact p.basis_sets_mem {i} hε, },
{ rw [id, (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball] } },
{ rw p.module_filter_basis.to_filter_basis.has_basis.ge_iff,
rintros U (hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets),
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩,
rw [id, seminorm.ball_finset_sup_eq_Inter _ _ _ hr, s.Inter_mem_sets],
exact λ i hi, filter.mem_infi_of_mem i ⟨metric.ball 0 r, metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 hr,
eq.subset ((p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball).symm⟩, },
end
end seminorm_family
end filter_basis
section bounded
namespace seminorm
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E] [add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜 F]
-- Todo: This should be phrased entirely in terms of the von Neumann bornology.
/-- The proposition that a linear map is bounded between spaces with families of seminorms. -/
def is_bounded (p : ι → seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : ι' → seminorm 𝕜 F) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : Prop :=
∀ i, ∃ s : finset ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, C ≠ 0 ∧ (q i).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p
lemma is_bounded_const (ι' : Type*) [nonempty ι']
{p : ι → seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : seminorm 𝕜 F} (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
is_bounded p (λ _ : ι', q) f ↔ ∃ (s : finset ι) C : ℝ≥0, C ≠ 0 ∧ q.comp f ≤ C • s.sup p :=
by simp only [is_bounded, forall_const]
lemma const_is_bounded (ι : Type*) [nonempty ι]
{p : seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → seminorm 𝕜 F} (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
is_bounded (λ _ : ι, p) q f ↔ ∀ i, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, C ≠ 0 ∧ (q i).comp f ≤ C • p :=
begin
split; intros h i,
{ rcases h i with ⟨s, C, hC, h⟩,
exact ⟨C, hC, le_trans h (smul_le_smul (finset.sup_le (λ _ _, le_rfl)) le_rfl)⟩ },
use [{classical.arbitrary ι}],
simp only [h, finset.sup_singleton],
end
lemma is_bounded_sup {p : ι → seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → seminorm 𝕜 F}
{f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F} (hf : is_bounded p q f) (s' : finset ι') :
∃ (C : ℝ≥0) (s : finset ι), 0 < C ∧ (s'.sup q).comp f ≤ C • (s.sup p) :=
begin
classical,
by_cases hs' : ¬s'.nonempty,
{ refine ⟨1, ∅, zero_lt_one, _⟩,
rw [finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp hs', finset.sup_empty, seminorm.bot_eq_zero, zero_comp],
exact seminorm.nonneg _ },
rw not_not at hs',
choose fₛ fC hf using hf,
use [s'.card • s'.sup fC, finset.bUnion s' fₛ],
split,
{ refine nsmul_pos _ (ne_of_gt (finset.nonempty.card_pos hs')),
cases finset.nonempty.bex hs' with j hj,
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_iff.mpr (and.elim_left (hf j))) (finset.le_sup hj) },
have hs : ∀ i : ι', i ∈ s' → (q i).comp f ≤ s'.sup fC • ((finset.bUnion s' fₛ).sup p) :=
begin
intros i hi,
refine le_trans (and.elim_right (hf i)) (smul_le_smul _ (finset.le_sup hi)),
exact finset.sup_mono (finset.subset_bUnion_of_mem fₛ hi),
end,
refine le_trans (comp_mono f (finset_sup_le_sum q s')) _,
simp_rw [←pullback_apply, add_monoid_hom.map_sum, pullback_apply],
refine le_trans (finset.sum_le_sum hs) _,
rw [finset.sum_const, smul_assoc],
exact le_rfl,
end
end seminorm
end bounded
section topology
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E] [nonempty ι]
/-- The proposition that the topology of `E` is induced by a family of seminorms `p`. -/
structure with_seminorms (p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι) [t : topological_space E] : Prop :=
(topology_eq_with_seminorms : t = p.module_filter_basis.topology)
lemma seminorm_family.with_seminorms_eq {p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι} [t : topological_space E]
(hp : with_seminorms p) : t = p.module_filter_basis.topology := hp.1
variables [topological_space E]
variables {p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι}
lemma with_seminorms.has_basis (hp : with_seminorms p) : (𝓝 (0 : E)).has_basis
(λ (s : set E), s ∈ p.basis_sets) id :=
begin
rw (congr_fun (congr_arg (@nhds E) hp.1) 0),
exact add_group_filter_basis.nhds_zero_has_basis _,
end
end topology
section topological_add_group
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E]
variables [topological_space E] [topological_add_group E]
variables [nonempty ι]
lemma seminorm_family.with_seminorms_of_nhds (p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι)
(h : 𝓝 (0 : E) = p.module_filter_basis.to_filter_basis.filter) :
with_seminorms p :=
begin
refine ⟨topological_add_group.ext (by apply_instance)
(p.add_group_filter_basis.is_topological_add_group) _⟩,
rw add_group_filter_basis.nhds_zero_eq,
exact h,
end
lemma seminorm_family.with_seminorms_of_has_basis (p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι)
(h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).has_basis (λ (s : set E), s ∈ p.basis_sets) id) :
with_seminorms p :=
p.with_seminorms_of_nhds $ filter.has_basis.eq_of_same_basis h
p.add_group_filter_basis.to_filter_basis.has_basis
lemma seminorm_family.with_seminorms_iff_nhds_eq_infi (p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι) :
with_seminorms p ↔ (𝓝 0 : filter E) = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) :=
begin
rw ← p.filter_eq_infi,
refine ⟨λ h, _, p.with_seminorms_of_nhds⟩,
rw h.topology_eq_with_seminorms,
exact add_group_filter_basis.nhds_zero_eq _,
end
end topological_add_group
section normed_space
/-- The topology of a `normed_space 𝕜 E` is induced by the seminorm `norm_seminorm 𝕜 E`. -/
lemma norm_with_seminorms (𝕜 E) [normed_field 𝕜] [seminormed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] :
with_seminorms (λ (_ : fin 1), norm_seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
begin
let p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E (fin 1) := λ _, norm_seminorm 𝕜 E,
refine ⟨topological_add_group.ext normed_top_group
(p.add_group_filter_basis.is_topological_add_group) _⟩,
refine filter.has_basis.eq_of_same_basis metric.nhds_basis_ball _,
rw ←ball_norm_seminorm 𝕜 E,
refine filter.has_basis.to_has_basis p.add_group_filter_basis.nhds_zero_has_basis _
(λ r hr, ⟨(norm_seminorm 𝕜 E).ball 0 r, p.basis_sets_singleton_mem 0 hr, rfl.subset⟩),
rintros U (hU : U ∈ p.basis_sets),
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩,
use [r, hr],
rw [hU, id.def],
by_cases h : s.nonempty,
{ rw finset.sup_const h },
rw [finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp h, finset.sup_empty, ball_bot _ hr],
exact set.subset_univ _,
end
end normed_space
section nontrivially_normed_field
variables [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E] [nonempty ι]
variables {p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι}
variables [topological_space E]
lemma with_seminorms.is_vonN_bounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded {s : set E}
(hp : with_seminorms p) :
bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ I : finset ι, ∃ r (hr : 0 < r), ∀ (x ∈ s), I.sup p x < r :=
begin
rw (hp.has_basis).is_vonN_bounded_basis_iff,
split,
{ intros h I,
simp only [id.def] at h,
specialize h ((I.sup p).ball 0 1) (p.basis_sets_mem I zero_lt_one),
rcases h with ⟨r, hr, h⟩,
cases normed_field.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 r with a ha,
specialize h a (le_of_lt ha),
rw [seminorm.smul_ball_zero (lt_trans hr ha), mul_one] at h,
refine ⟨∥a∥, lt_trans hr ha, _⟩,
intros x hx,
specialize h hx,
exact (finset.sup I p).mem_ball_zero.mp h },
intros h s' hs',
rcases p.basis_sets_iff.mp hs' with ⟨I, r, hr, hs'⟩,
rw [id.def, hs'],
rcases h I with ⟨r', hr', h'⟩,
simp_rw ←(I.sup p).mem_ball_zero at h',
refine absorbs.mono_right _ h',
exact (finset.sup I p).ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr,
end
lemma bornology.is_vonN_bounded_iff_seminorm_bounded {s : set E} (hp : with_seminorms p) :
bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ i : ι, ∃ r (hr : 0 < r), ∀ (x ∈ s), p i x < r :=
begin
rw hp.is_vonN_bounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded,
split,
{ intros hI i,
convert hI {i},
rw [finset.sup_singleton] },
intros hi I,
by_cases hI : I.nonempty,
{ choose r hr h using hi,
have h' : 0 < I.sup' hI r :=
by { rcases hI.bex with ⟨i, hi⟩, exact lt_of_lt_of_le (hr i) (finset.le_sup' r hi) },
refine ⟨I.sup' hI r, h', λ x hx, finset_sup_apply_lt h' (λ i hi, _)⟩,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (h i x hx) _,
simp only [finset.le_sup'_iff, exists_prop],
exact ⟨i, hi, (eq.refl _).le⟩ },
simp only [finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp hI, finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, pi.zero_apply,
exists_prop],
exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ _ _, zero_lt_one⟩,
end
end nontrivially_normed_field
section continuous_bounded
namespace seminorm
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E] [add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜 F]
variables [nonempty ι] [nonempty ι']
lemma continuous_from_bounded {p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι} {q : seminorm_family 𝕜 F ι'}
[uniform_space E] [uniform_add_group E] (hp : with_seminorms p)
[uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F] (hq : with_seminorms q)
(f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (hf : seminorm.is_bounded p q f) : continuous f :=
begin
refine continuous_of_continuous_at_zero f _,
rw [continuous_at_def, f.map_zero, hp.1],
intros U hU,
rw [hq.1, add_group_filter_basis.nhds_zero_eq, filter_basis.mem_filter_iff] at hU,
rcases hU with ⟨V, hV : V ∈ q.basis_sets, hU⟩,
rcases q.basis_sets_iff.mp hV with ⟨s₂, r, hr, hV⟩,
rw hV at hU,
rw [p.add_group_filter_basis.nhds_zero_eq, filter_basis.mem_filter_iff],
rcases (seminorm.is_bounded_sup hf s₂) with ⟨C, s₁, hC, hf⟩,
refine ⟨(s₁.sup p).ball 0 (r/C), p.basis_sets_mem _ (div_pos hr (nnreal.coe_pos.mpr hC)), _⟩,
refine subset.trans _ (preimage_mono hU),
simp_rw [←linear_map.map_zero f, ←ball_comp],
refine subset.trans _ (ball_antitone hf),
rw ball_smul (s₁.sup p) hC,
end
lemma cont_with_seminorms_normed_space (F) [seminormed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
[uniform_space E] [uniform_add_group E]
{p : ι → seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : with_seminorms p) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : ∃ (s : finset ι) C : ℝ≥0, C ≠ 0 ∧ (norm_seminorm 𝕜 F).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p) :
continuous f :=
begin
rw ←seminorm.is_bounded_const (fin 1) at hf,
exact continuous_from_bounded hp (norm_with_seminorms 𝕜 F) f hf,
end
lemma cont_normed_space_to_with_seminorms (E) [seminormed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
[uniform_space F] [uniform_add_group F]
{q : ι → seminorm 𝕜 F} (hq : with_seminorms q) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : ∀ i : ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, C ≠ 0 ∧ (q i).comp f ≤ C • (norm_seminorm 𝕜 E)) : continuous f :=
begin
rw ←seminorm.const_is_bounded (fin 1) at hf,
exact continuous_from_bounded (norm_with_seminorms 𝕜 E) hq f hf,
end
end seminorm
end continuous_bounded
section locally_convex_space
open locally_convex_space
variables [nonempty ι] [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space ℝ 𝕜]
[add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E] [module ℝ E] [is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E] [topological_space E]
[topological_add_group E]
lemma seminorm_family.to_locally_convex_space {p : seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι} (hp : with_seminorms p) :
locally_convex_space ℝ E :=
begin
apply of_basis_zero ℝ E id (λ s, s ∈ p.basis_sets),
{ rw [hp.1, add_group_filter_basis.nhds_eq _, add_group_filter_basis.N_zero],
exact filter_basis.has_basis _ },
{ intros s hs,
change s ∈ set.Union _ at hs,
simp_rw [set.mem_Union, set.mem_singleton_iff] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨I, r, hr, rfl⟩,
exact convex_ball _ _ _ }
end
end locally_convex_space
section normed_space
variables (𝕜) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space ℝ 𝕜] [seminormed_add_comm_group E]
/-- Not an instance since `𝕜` can't be inferred. See `normed_space.to_locally_convex_space` for a
slightly weaker instance version. -/
lemma normed_space.to_locally_convex_space' [normed_space 𝕜 E] [module ℝ E]
[is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E] : locally_convex_space ℝ E :=
seminorm_family.to_locally_convex_space (norm_with_seminorms 𝕜 E)
/-- See `normed_space.to_locally_convex_space'` for a slightly stronger version which is not an
instance. -/
instance normed_space.to_locally_convex_space [normed_space ℝ E] :
locally_convex_space ℝ E :=
normed_space.to_locally_convex_space' ℝ
end normed_space
section topological_constructions
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜 F] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E]
/-- The family of seminorms obtained by composing each seminorm by a linear map. -/
def seminorm_family.comp (q : seminorm_family 𝕜 F ι) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
seminorm_family 𝕜 E ι :=
λ i, (q i).comp f
lemma seminorm_family.comp_apply (q : seminorm_family 𝕜 F ι) (i : ι) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
q.comp f i = (q i).comp f :=
rfl
lemma seminorm_family.finset_sup_comp (q : seminorm_family 𝕜 F ι) (s : finset ι)
(f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : (s.sup q).comp f = s.sup (q.comp f) :=
begin
ext x,
rw [seminorm.comp_apply, seminorm.finset_sup_apply, seminorm.finset_sup_apply],
refl
end
variables [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F]
lemma linear_map.with_seminorms_induced [hι : nonempty ι] {q : seminorm_family 𝕜 F ι}
(hq : with_seminorms q) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
@with_seminorms 𝕜 E ι _ _ _ _ (q.comp f) (induced f infer_instance) :=
begin
letI : topological_space E := induced f infer_instance,
letI : topological_add_group E := topological_add_group_induced f,
rw [(q.comp f).with_seminorms_iff_nhds_eq_infi, nhds_induced, map_zero,
q.with_seminorms_iff_nhds_eq_infi.mp hq, filter.comap_infi],
refine infi_congr (λ i, _),
exact filter.comap_comap
end
lemma inducing.with_seminorms [hι : nonempty ι] {q : seminorm_family 𝕜 F ι}
(hq : with_seminorms q) [topological_space E] {f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F} (hf : inducing f) :
with_seminorms (q.comp f) :=
begin
rw hf.induced,
exact f.with_seminorms_induced hq
end
end topological_constructions
|
0ddd5bed2cfd0f90c1a27a487cc320e7d0f6df61 | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/set_theory/cardinal.lean | 3d1bbe1465d23c8dc029cb7f8214cefce63d427c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 45,509 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.set.countable
import set_theory.schroeder_bernstein
import data.fintype.card
/-!
# Cardinal Numbers
We define cardinal numbers as a quotient of types under the equivalence relation of equinumerity.
We define the order on cardinal numbers, define omega, and do basic cardinal arithmetic:
addition, multiplication, power, cardinal successor, minimum, supremum,
infinitary sums and products
## Implementation notes
* There is a type of cardinal numbers in every universe level: `cardinal.{u} : Type (u + 1)`
is the quotient of types in `Type u`.
There is a lift operation lifting cardinal numbers to a higher level.
* Cardinal arithmetic specifically for infinite cardinals (like `κ * κ = κ`) is in the file
`set_theory/ordinal.lean`, because concepts from that file are used in the proof.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, omega
-/
open function set
open_locale classical
universes u v w x
variables {α β : Type u}
/-- The equivalence relation on types given by equivalence (bijective correspondence) of types.
Quotienting by this equivalence relation gives the cardinal numbers.
-/
instance cardinal.is_equivalent : setoid (Type u) :=
{ r := λα β, nonempty (α ≃ β),
iseqv := ⟨λα,
⟨equiv.refl α⟩,
λα β ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.symm⟩,
λα β γ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩, ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩ }
/-- `cardinal.{u}` is the type of cardinal numbers in `Type u`,
defined as the quotient of `Type u` by existence of an equivalence
(a bijection with explicit inverse). -/
def cardinal : Type (u + 1) := quotient cardinal.is_equivalent
namespace cardinal
/-- The cardinal number of a type -/
def mk : Type u → cardinal := quotient.mk
localized "notation `#` := cardinal.mk" in cardinal
protected lemma eq : mk α = mk β ↔ nonempty (α ≃ β) := quotient.eq
@[simp] theorem mk_def (α : Type u) : @eq cardinal ⟦α⟧ (mk α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_out (c : cardinal) : mk (c.out) = c := quotient.out_eq _
/-- We define the order on cardinal numbers by `mk α ≤ mk β` if and only if
there exists an embedding (injective function) from α to β. -/
instance : has_le cardinal.{u} :=
⟨λq₁ q₂, quotient.lift_on₂ q₁ q₂ (λα β, nonempty $ α ↪ β) $
assume α β γ δ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩,
propext ⟨assume ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.congr e₁ e₂⟩, assume ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.congr e₁.symm e₂.symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem mk_le_of_injective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) : mk α ≤ mk β :=
⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
theorem mk_le_of_surjective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) : mk β ≤ mk α :=
⟨embedding.of_surjective f hf⟩
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_set {c : cardinal} {α : Type u} :
c ≤ mk α ↔ ∃ p : set α, mk p = c :=
⟨quotient.induction_on c $ λ β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩,
⟨set.range f, eq.symm $ quot.sound ⟨equiv.set.range f hf⟩⟩,
λ ⟨p, e⟩, e ▸ ⟨⟨subtype.val, λ a b, subtype.eq⟩⟩⟩
theorem out_embedding {c c' : cardinal} : c ≤ c' ↔ nonempty (c.out ↪ c'.out) :=
by { transitivity _, rw [←quotient.out_eq c, ←quotient.out_eq c'], refl }
instance : linear_order cardinal.{u} :=
{ le := (≤),
le_refl := by rintros ⟨α⟩; exact ⟨embedding.refl _⟩,
le_trans := by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩,
le_antisymm := by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact quotient.sound (e₁.antisymm e₂),
le_total := by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩; exact embedding.total }
noncomputable instance : decidable_linear_order cardinal.{u} := classical.DLO _
noncomputable instance : distrib_lattice cardinal.{u} := by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance : has_zero cardinal.{u} := ⟨⟦pempty⟧⟩
instance : inhabited cardinal.{u} := ⟨0⟩
theorem ne_zero_iff_nonempty {α : Type u} : mk α ≠ 0 ↔ nonempty α :=
not_iff_comm.1
⟨λ h, quotient.sound ⟨(equiv.empty_of_not_nonempty h).trans equiv.empty_equiv_pempty⟩,
λ e, let ⟨h⟩ := quotient.exact e in λ ⟨a⟩, (h a).elim⟩
instance : has_one cardinal.{u} := ⟨⟦punit⟧⟩
instance : nonzero cardinal.{u} :=
{ zero_ne_one := ne.symm $ ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 ⟨punit.star⟩ }
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : mk α ≤ 1 ↔ subsingleton α :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨λ a b, f.injective (subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩,
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨⟨λ a, punit.star, λ a b _, h _ _⟩⟩⟩
instance : has_add cardinal.{u} :=
⟨λq₁ q₂, quotient.lift_on₂ q₁ q₂ (λα β, mk (α ⊕ β)) $ assume α β γ δ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sum_congr e₁ e₂⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem add_def (α β) : mk α + mk β = mk (α ⊕ β) := rfl
instance : has_mul cardinal.{u} :=
⟨λq₁ q₂, quotient.lift_on₂ q₁ q₂ (λα β, mk (α × β)) $ assume α β γ δ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.prod_congr e₁ e₂⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_def (α β : Type u) : mk α * mk β = mk (α × β) := rfl
private theorem add_comm (a b : cardinal.{u}) : a + b = b + a :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ assume α β, quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sum_comm α β⟩
private theorem mul_comm (a b : cardinal.{u}) : a * b = b * a :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ assume α β, quotient.sound ⟨equiv.prod_comm α β⟩
private theorem zero_add (a : cardinal.{u}) : 0 + a = a :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume α, quotient.sound ⟨equiv.pempty_sum α⟩
private theorem zero_mul (a : cardinal.{u}) : 0 * a = 0 :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume α, quotient.sound ⟨equiv.pempty_prod α⟩
private theorem one_mul (a : cardinal.{u}) : 1 * a = a :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume α, quotient.sound ⟨equiv.punit_prod α⟩
private theorem left_distrib (a b c : cardinal.{u}) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ, quotient.sound ⟨equiv.prod_sum_distrib α β γ⟩
instance : comm_semiring cardinal.{u} :=
{ zero := 0,
one := 1,
add := (+),
mul := (*),
zero_add := zero_add,
add_zero := assume a, by rw [add_comm a 0, zero_add a],
add_assoc := λa b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sum_assoc α β γ⟩,
add_comm := add_comm,
zero_mul := zero_mul,
mul_zero := assume a, by rw [mul_comm a 0, zero_mul a],
one_mul := one_mul,
mul_one := assume a, by rw [mul_comm a 1, one_mul a],
mul_assoc := λa b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.prod_assoc α β γ⟩,
mul_comm := mul_comm,
left_distrib := left_distrib,
right_distrib := assume a b c,
by rw [mul_comm (a + b) c, left_distrib c a b, mul_comm c a, mul_comm c b] }
/-- The cardinal exponential. `mk α ^ mk β` is the cardinal of `β → α`. -/
protected def power (a b : cardinal.{u}) : cardinal.{u} :=
quotient.lift_on₂ a b (λα β, mk (β → α)) $ assume α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.arrow_congr e₂ e₁⟩
instance : has_pow cardinal cardinal := ⟨cardinal.power⟩
local infixr ^ := @has_pow.pow cardinal cardinal cardinal.has_pow
@[simp] theorem power_def (α β) : mk α ^ mk β = mk (β → α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem power_zero {a : cardinal} : a ^ 0 = 1 :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume α, quotient.sound
⟨equiv.pempty_arrow_equiv_punit α⟩
@[simp] theorem power_one {a : cardinal} : a ^ 1 = a :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume α, quotient.sound
⟨equiv.punit_arrow_equiv α⟩
@[simp] theorem one_power {a : cardinal} : 1 ^ a = 1 :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume α, quotient.sound
⟨equiv.arrow_punit_equiv_punit α⟩
@[simp] theorem prop_eq_two : mk (ulift Prop) = 2 :=
quot.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans $ equiv.Prop_equiv_bool.trans equiv.bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_power {a : cardinal} : a ≠ 0 → 0 ^ a = 0 :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume α heq,
nonempty.rec_on (ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 heq) $ assume a,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.equiv_pempty $ assume f, pempty.rec (λ _, false) (f a)⟩
theorem power_ne_zero {a : cardinal} (b) : a ≠ 0 → a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β h,
let ⟨a⟩ := ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h in
ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 ⟨λ _, a⟩
theorem mul_power {a b c : cardinal} : (a * b) ^ c = a ^ c * b ^ c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.arrow_prod_equiv_prod_arrow α β γ⟩
theorem power_add {a b c : cardinal} : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow β γ α⟩
theorem power_mul {a b c : cardinal} : (a ^ b) ^ c = a ^ (b * c) :=
by rw [_root_.mul_comm b c];
from (quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.arrow_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow γ β α⟩)
@[simp] lemma pow_cast_right (κ : cardinal.{u}) :
∀ n : ℕ, (κ ^ (↑n : cardinal.{u})) = @has_pow.pow _ _ monoid.has_pow κ n
| 0 := by simp
| (_+1) := by rw [nat.cast_succ, power_add, power_one, _root_.mul_comm, pow_succ, pow_cast_right]
section order_properties
open sum
theorem zero_le : ∀(a : cardinal), 0 ≤ a :=
by rintro ⟨α⟩; exact ⟨embedding.of_not_nonempty $ λ ⟨a⟩, a.elim⟩
theorem le_zero (a : cardinal) : a ≤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff, zero_le]
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : cardinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, zero_le]
theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : cardinal) < 1 :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) zero_ne_one
lemma zero_power_le (c : cardinal.{u}) : (0 : cardinal.{u}) ^ c ≤ 1 :=
by { by_cases h : c = 0, rw [h, power_zero], rw [zero_power h], apply zero_le }
theorem add_le_add : ∀{a b c d : cardinal}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a + c ≤ b + d :=
by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨δ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨embedding.sum_congr e₁ e₂⟩
theorem add_le_add_left (a) {b c : cardinal} : b ≤ c → a + b ≤ a + c :=
add_le_add (le_refl _)
theorem add_le_add_right {a b : cardinal} (c) (h : a ≤ b) : a + c ≤ b + c :=
add_le_add h (le_refl _)
theorem le_add_right (a b : cardinal) : a ≤ a + b :=
by simpa using add_le_add_left a (zero_le b)
theorem le_add_left (a b : cardinal) : a ≤ b + a :=
by simpa using add_le_add_right a (zero_le b)
theorem mul_le_mul : ∀{a b c d : cardinal}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a * c ≤ b * d :=
by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨δ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨embedding.prod_congr e₁ e₂⟩
theorem mul_le_mul_left (a) {b c : cardinal} : b ≤ c → a * b ≤ a * c :=
mul_le_mul (le_refl _)
theorem mul_le_mul_right {a b : cardinal} (c) (h : a ≤ b) : a * c ≤ b * c :=
mul_le_mul h (le_refl _)
theorem power_le_power_left : ∀{a b c : cardinal}, a ≠ 0 → b ≤ c → a ^ b ≤ a ^ c :=
by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ hα ⟨e⟩; exact
let ⟨a⟩ := ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 hα in
⟨@embedding.arrow_congr_right _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ e⟩
theorem power_le_max_power_one {a b c : cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ max (a ^ c) 1 :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
simp [ha, zero_power_le],
exact le_trans (power_le_power_left ha h) (le_max_left _ _)
end
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : cardinal} : a ≤ b → a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ ⟨e⟩, ⟨embedding.arrow_congr_left e⟩
theorem le_iff_exists_add {a b : cardinal} : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a + c :=
⟨quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩,
have (α ⊕ ↥-range f) ≃ β, from
(equiv.sum_congr (equiv.set.range f hf) (equiv.refl _)).trans $
(equiv.set.sum_compl (range f)),
⟨⟦(-range f : set β)⟧, quotient.sound ⟨this.symm⟩⟩,
λ ⟨c, e⟩, add_zero a ▸ e.symm ▸ add_le_add_left _ (zero_le _)⟩
end order_properties
instance : order_bot cardinal.{u} :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := zero_le, ..cardinal.linear_order }
instance : canonically_ordered_add_monoid cardinal.{u} :=
{ add_le_add_left := λ a b h c, add_le_add_left _ h,
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := λ a b c, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (add_le_add_left _),
le_iff_exists_add := @le_iff_exists_add,
..cardinal.order_bot,
..cardinal.comm_semiring, ..cardinal.linear_order }
theorem cantor : ∀(a : cardinal.{u}), a < 2 ^ a :=
by rw ← prop_eq_two; rintros ⟨a⟩; exact ⟨
⟨⟨λ a b, ⟨a = b⟩, λ a b h, cast (ulift.up.inj (@congr_fun _ _ _ _ h b)).symm rfl⟩⟩,
λ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩, cantor_injective (λ s, f (λ a, ⟨s a⟩)) $
λ s t h, by funext a; injection congr_fun (hf h) a⟩
instance : no_top_order cardinal.{u} :=
{ no_top := λ a, ⟨_, cantor a⟩, ..cardinal.linear_order }
/-- The minimum cardinal in a family of cardinals (the existence
of which is provided by `injective_min`). -/
noncomputable def min {ι} (I : nonempty ι) (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal :=
f $ classical.some $
@embedding.min_injective _ (λ i, (f i).out) I
theorem min_eq {ι} (I) (f : ι → cardinal) : ∃ i, min I f = f i :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem min_le {ι I} (f : ι → cardinal) (i) : min I f ≤ f i :=
by rw [← mk_out (min I f), ← mk_out (f i)]; exact
let ⟨g⟩ := classical.some_spec
(@embedding.min_injective _ (λ i, (f i).out) I) in
⟨g i⟩
theorem le_min {ι I} {f : ι → cardinal} {a} : a ≤ min I f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans h (min_le _ _),
λ h, let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I f in e.symm ▸ h i⟩
protected theorem wf : @well_founded cardinal.{u} (<) :=
⟨λ a, classical.by_contradiction $ λ h,
let ι := {c :cardinal // ¬ acc (<) c},
f : ι → cardinal := subtype.val,
⟨⟨c, hc⟩, hi⟩ := @min_eq ι ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ f in
hc (acc.intro _ (λ j ⟨_, h'⟩,
classical.by_contradiction $ λ hj, h' $
by have := min_le f ⟨j, hj⟩; rwa hi at this))⟩
instance has_wf : @has_well_founded cardinal.{u} := ⟨(<), cardinal.wf⟩
instance wo : @is_well_order cardinal.{u} (<) := ⟨cardinal.wf⟩
/-- The successor cardinal - the smallest cardinal greater than
`c`. This is not the same as `c + 1` except in the case of finite `c`. -/
noncomputable def succ (c : cardinal) : cardinal :=
@min {c' // c < c'} ⟨⟨_, cantor _⟩⟩ subtype.val
theorem lt_succ_self (c : cardinal) : c < succ c :=
by cases min_eq _ _ with s e; rw [succ, e]; exact s.2
theorem succ_le {a b : cardinal} : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_succ_self _), λ h,
by exact min_le _ (subtype.mk b h)⟩
theorem lt_succ {a b : cardinal} : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, succ_le, not_lt]
theorem add_one_le_succ (c : cardinal) : c + 1 ≤ succ c :=
begin
refine quot.induction_on c (λ α, _) (lt_succ_self c),
refine quot.induction_on (succ (quot.mk setoid.r α)) (λ β h, _),
cases h.left with f,
have : ¬ surjective f := λ hn,
ne_of_lt h (quotient.sound ⟨equiv.of_bijective f ⟨f.injective, hn⟩⟩),
cases classical.not_forall.1 this with b nex,
refine ⟨⟨sum.rec (by exact f) _, _⟩⟩,
{ exact λ _, b },
{ intros a b h, rcases a with a|⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with b|⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩,
{ rw f.injective h },
{ exact nex.elim ⟨_, h⟩ },
{ exact nex.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩ },
{ refl } }
end
lemma succ_ne_zero (c : cardinal) : succ c ≠ 0 :=
by { rw [←pos_iff_ne_zero, lt_succ], apply zero_le }
/-- The indexed sum of cardinals is the cardinality of the
indexed disjoint union, i.e. sigma type. -/
def sum {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal := mk Σ i, (f i).out
theorem le_sum {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) (i) : f i ≤ sum f :=
by rw ← quotient.out_eq (f i); exact
⟨⟨λ a, ⟨i, a⟩, λ a b h, eq_of_heq $ by injection h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem sum_mk {ι} (f : ι → Type*) : sum (λ i, mk (f i)) = mk (Σ i, f i) :=
quot.sound ⟨equiv.sigma_congr_right $ λ i,
classical.choice $ quotient.exact $ quot.out_eq $ mk (f i)⟩
theorem sum_const (ι : Type u) (a : cardinal.{u}) : sum (λ _:ι, a) = mk ι * a :=
quotient.induction_on a $ λ α, by simp; exact
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sigma_equiv_prod _ _⟩
theorem sum_le_sum {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : sum f ≤ sum g :=
⟨embedding.sigma_congr_right $ λ i, classical.choice $
by have := H i; rwa [← quot.out_eq (f i), ← quot.out_eq (g i)] at this⟩
/-- The indexed supremum of cardinals is the smallest cardinal above
everything in the family. -/
noncomputable def sup {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal :=
@min {c // ∀ i, f i ≤ c} ⟨⟨sum f, le_sum f⟩⟩ (λ a, a.1)
theorem le_sup {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) (i) : f i ≤ sup f :=
by dsimp [sup]; cases min_eq _ _ with c hc; rw hc; exact c.2 i
theorem sup_le {ι} {f : ι → cardinal} {a} : sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans (le_sup _ _) h,
λ h, by dsimp [sup]; change a with (⟨a, h⟩:subtype _).1; apply min_le⟩
theorem sup_le_sup {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : sup f ≤ sup g :=
sup_le.2 $ λ i, le_trans (H i) (le_sup _ _)
theorem sup_le_sum {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : sup f ≤ sum f :=
sup_le.2 $ le_sum _
theorem sum_le_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ mk ι * sup.{u u} f :=
by rw ← sum_const; exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_sup _)
theorem sup_eq_zero {ι} {f : ι → cardinal} (h : ι → false) : sup f = 0 :=
by { rw [←le_zero, sup_le], intro x, exfalso, exact h x }
/-- The indexed product of cardinals is the cardinality of the Pi type
(dependent product). -/
def prod {ι : Type u} (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal := mk (Π i, (f i).out)
@[simp] theorem prod_mk {ι} (f : ι → Type*) : prod (λ i, mk (f i)) = mk (Π i, f i) :=
quot.sound ⟨equiv.Pi_congr_right $ λ i,
classical.choice $ quotient.exact $ mk_out $ mk (f i)⟩
theorem prod_const (ι : Type u) (a : cardinal.{u}) : prod (λ _:ι, a) = a ^ mk ι :=
quotient.induction_on a $ by simp
theorem prod_le_prod {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : prod f ≤ prod g :=
⟨embedding.Pi_congr_right $ λ i, classical.choice $
by have := H i; rwa [← mk_out (f i), ← mk_out (g i)] at this⟩
theorem prod_ne_zero {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : prod f ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i ≠ 0 :=
begin
conv in (f _) {rw ← mk_out (f i)},
simp [prod, ne_zero_iff_nonempty, -mk_out, -ne.def],
exact ⟨λ ⟨F⟩ i, ⟨F i⟩, λ h, ⟨λ i, classical.choice (h i)⟩⟩,
end
theorem prod_eq_zero {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : prod f = 0 ↔ ∃ i, f i = 0 :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by simpa using prod_ne_zero f
/-- The universe lift operation on cardinals. You can specify the universes explicitly with
`lift.{u v} : cardinal.{u} → cardinal.{max u v}` -/
def lift (c : cardinal.{u}) : cardinal.{max u v} :=
quotient.lift_on c (λ α, ⟦ulift α⟧) $ λ α β ⟨e⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans $ e.trans equiv.ulift.symm⟩
theorem lift_mk (α) : lift.{u v} (mk α) = mk (ulift.{v u} α) := rfl
theorem lift_umax : lift.{u (max u v)} = lift.{u v} :=
funext $ λ a, quot.induction_on a $ λ α,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans equiv.ulift.symm⟩
theorem lift_id' (a : cardinal) : lift a = a :=
quot.induction_on a $ λ α, quot.sound ⟨equiv.ulift⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u u} a = a := lift_id'.{u u}
@[simp] theorem lift_lift (a : cardinal) : lift.{(max u v) w} (lift.{u v} a) = lift.{u (max v w)} a :=
quot.induction_on a $ λ α,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans $ equiv.ulift.trans equiv.ulift.symm⟩
theorem lift_mk_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{u (max v w)} (mk α) ≤ lift.{v (max u w)} (mk β) ↔ nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨embedding.congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift f⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨embedding.congr equiv.ulift.symm equiv.ulift.symm f⟩⟩
theorem lift_mk_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{u (max v w)} (mk α) = lift.{v (max u w)} (mk β) ↔ nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
quotient.eq.trans
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨equiv.ulift.symm.trans $ f.trans equiv.ulift⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨equiv.ulift.trans $ f.trans equiv.ulift.symm⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_le {a b : cardinal} : lift a ≤ lift b ↔ a ≤ b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
by rw ← lift_umax; exact lift_mk_le
@[simp] theorem lift_inj {a b : cardinal} : lift a = lift b ↔ a = b :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp] theorem lift_lt {a b : cardinal} : lift a < lift b ↔ a < b :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le, -not_le]
@[simp] theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans equiv.pempty_equiv_pempty⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans equiv.punit_equiv_punit⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_add (a b) : lift (a + b) = lift a + lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans (equiv.sum_congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_mul (a b) : lift (a * b) = lift a * lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans (equiv.prod_congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_power (a b) : lift (a ^ b) = lift a ^ lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.ulift.trans (equiv.arrow_congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_two_power (a) : lift (2 ^ a) = 2 ^ lift a :=
by simp [bit0]
@[simp] theorem lift_min {ι I} (f : ι → cardinal) : lift (min I f) = min I (lift ∘ f) :=
le_antisymm (le_min.2 $ λ a, lift_le.2 $ min_le _ a) $
let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I (lift ∘ f) in
by rw e; exact lift_le.2 (le_min.2 $ λ j, lift_le.1 $
by have := min_le (lift ∘ f) j; rwa e at this)
theorem lift_down {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift a → ∃ a', lift a' = b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
by dsimp; rw [← lift_id (mk β), ← lift_umax, ← lift_umax.{u v}, lift_mk_le]; exact
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨mk (set.range f), eq.symm $ lift_mk_eq.2
⟨embedding.equiv_of_surjective
(embedding.cod_restrict _ f set.mem_range_self)
$ λ ⟨a, ⟨b, e⟩⟩, ⟨b, subtype.eq e⟩⟩⟩
theorem le_lift_iff {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h in ⟨a', e, lift_le.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h) in
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_succ (a) : lift (succ a) = succ (lift a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt $ λ h, begin
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨b, e, h⟩,
rw [lt_succ, ← lift_le, e] at h,
exact not_lt_of_le h (lt_succ_self _)
end)
(succ_le.2 $ lift_lt.2 $ lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] theorem lift_max {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{v}} :
lift.{u (max v w)} a = lift.{v (max u w)} b ↔ lift.{u v} a = lift.{v u} b :=
calc lift.{u (max v w)} a = lift.{v (max u w)} b
↔ lift.{(max u v) w} (lift.{u v} a)
= lift.{(max u v) w} (lift.{v u} b) : by simp
... ↔ lift.{u v} a = lift.{v u} b : lift_inj
theorem mk_prod {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
mk (α × β) = lift.{u v} (mk α) * lift.{v u} (mk β) :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.prod_congr (equiv.ulift).symm (equiv.ulift).symm⟩
theorem sum_const_eq_lift_mul (ι : Type u) (a : cardinal.{v}) :
sum (λ _:ι, a) = lift.{u v} (mk ι) * lift.{v u} a :=
begin
apply quotient.induction_on a,
intro α,
simp only [cardinal.mk_def, cardinal.sum_mk, cardinal.lift_id],
convert mk_prod using 1,
exact quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sigma_equiv_prod ι α⟩,
end
/-- `ω` is the smallest infinite cardinal, also known as ℵ₀. -/
def omega : cardinal.{u} := lift (mk ℕ)
lemma mk_nat : mk nat = omega := (lift_id _).symm
theorem omega_ne_zero : omega ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 ⟨⟨0⟩⟩
theorem omega_pos : 0 < omega :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 omega_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem lift_omega : lift omega = omega := lift_lift _
/- properties about the cast from nat -/
@[simp] theorem mk_fin : ∀ (n : ℕ), mk (fin n) = n
| 0 := quotient.sound ⟨(equiv.pempty_of_not_nonempty $ λ ⟨h⟩, h.elim0)⟩
| (n+1) := by rw [nat.cast_succ, ← mk_fin]; exact
quotient.sound (fintype.card_eq.1 $ by simp)
@[simp] theorem lift_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : lift n = n :=
by induction n; simp *
lemma lift_eq_nat_iff {a : cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} : lift.{u v} a = n ↔ a = n :=
by rw [← lift_nat_cast.{u v} n, lift_inj]
lemma nat_eq_lift_eq_iff {n : ℕ} {a : cardinal.{u}} :
(n : cardinal) = lift.{u v} a ↔ (n : cardinal) = a :=
by rw [← lift_nat_cast.{u v} n, lift_inj]
theorem lift_mk_fin (n : ℕ) : lift (mk (fin n)) = n := by simp
theorem fintype_card (α : Type u) [fintype α] : mk α = fintype.card α :=
by rw [← lift_mk_fin.{u}, ← lift_id (mk α), lift_mk_eq.{u 0 u}];
exact fintype.card_eq.1 (by simp)
theorem card_le_of_finset {α} (s : finset α) :
(s.card : cardinal) ≤ cardinal.mk α :=
begin
rw (_ : (s.card : cardinal) = cardinal.mk (↑s : set α)),
{ exact ⟨function.embedding.subtype _⟩ },
rw [cardinal.fintype_card, fintype.card_coe]
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_pow {m n : ℕ} : (↑(pow m n) : cardinal) = m ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [nat.pow_succ, -_root_.add_comm, power_add, *]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_le {m n : ℕ} : (m : cardinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_mk_fin, lift_le]; exact
⟨λ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩, begin
have : _ = fintype.card _ := finset.card_image_of_injective finset.univ hf,
simp at this,
rw [← fintype.card_fin n, ← this],
exact finset.card_le_of_subset (finset.subset_univ _)
end,
λ h, ⟨⟨λ i, ⟨i.1, lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 h⟩, λ a b h,
have _, from fin.veq_of_eq h, fin.eq_of_veq this⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : cardinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le, -not_le]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : cardinal) = n ↔ m = n :=
by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp, norm_cast, priority 900] theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : cardinal) = succ n :=
le_antisymm (add_one_le_succ _) (succ_le.2 $ nat_cast_lt.2 $ nat.lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] theorem succ_zero : succ 0 = 1 :=
by norm_cast
theorem cantor' (a) {b : cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a :=
by rw [← succ_le, (by norm_cast : succ 1 = 2)] at hb;
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (cantor _) (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c :=
by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 :=
by rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem nat_lt_omega (n : ℕ) : (n : cardinal.{u}) < omega :=
succ_le.1 $ by rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, omega, lift_mk_le.{0 0 u}]; exact
⟨⟨fin.val, λ a b, fin.eq_of_veq⟩⟩
theorem one_lt_omega : 1 < omega :=
by simpa using nat_lt_omega 1
theorem lt_omega {c : cardinal.{u}} : c < omega ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨λ h, begin
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, rfl, h'⟩,
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩,
suffices : finite S,
{ cases this, resetI,
existsi fintype.card S,
rw [← lift_nat_cast.{0 u}, lift_inj, fintype_card S] },
by_contra nf,
have P : ∀ (n : ℕ) (IH : ∀ i<n, S), ∃ a : S, ¬ ∃ y h, IH y h = a :=
λ n IH,
let g : {i | i < n} → S := λ ⟨i, h⟩, IH i h in
classical.not_forall.1 (λ h, nf
⟨fintype.of_surjective g (λ a, subtype.exists.2 (h a))⟩),
let F : ℕ → S := nat.lt_wf.fix (λ n IH, classical.some (P n IH)),
refine not_le_of_lt h' ⟨⟨F, _⟩⟩,
suffices : ∀ (n : ℕ) (m < n), F m ≠ F n,
{ refine λ m n, not_imp_not.1 (λ ne, _),
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with h|h|h,
{ exact this n m h },
{ contradiction },
{ exact (this m n h).symm } },
intros n m h,
have := classical.some_spec (P n (λ y _, F y)),
rw [← show F n = classical.some (P n (λ y _, F y)),
from nat.lt_wf.fix_eq (λ n IH, classical.some (P n IH)) n] at this,
exact λ e, this ⟨m, h, e⟩,
end, λ ⟨n, e⟩, e.symm ▸ nat_lt_omega _⟩
theorem omega_le {c : cardinal.{u}} : omega ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n:cardinal) ≤ c :=
⟨λ h n, le_trans (le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) h,
λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn, begin
rcases lt_omega.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact not_le_of_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _) (nat_cast_le.1 (h (n+1)))
end⟩
theorem lt_omega_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : mk α < omega ↔ nonempty (fintype α) :=
lt_omega.trans ⟨λ ⟨n, e⟩, begin
rw [← lift_mk_fin n] at e,
cases quotient.exact e with f,
exact ⟨fintype.of_equiv _ f.symm⟩
end, λ ⟨_⟩, by exactI ⟨_, fintype_card _⟩⟩
theorem lt_omega_iff_finite {α} {S : set α} : mk S < omega ↔ finite S :=
lt_omega_iff_fintype
instance can_lift_cardinal_nat : can_lift cardinal ℕ :=
⟨ coe, λ x, x < omega, λ x hx, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_omega.mp hx in ⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_omega {a b : cardinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a + b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
lemma add_lt_omega_iff {a b : cardinal} : a + b < omega ↔ a < omega ∧ b < omega :=
⟨λ h, ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) h, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_left _ _) h⟩,
λ⟨h1, h2⟩, add_lt_omega h1 h2⟩
theorem mul_lt_omega {a b : cardinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a * b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
lemma mul_lt_omega_iff {a b : cardinal} : a * b < omega ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < omega ∧ b < omega :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, by_cases ha : a = 0, { left, exact ha },
right, by_cases hb : b = 0, { left, exact hb },
right, rw [← ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb, split,
{ rw [← mul_one a], refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul (le_refl a) hb) h },
{ rw [← _root_.one_mul b], refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul ha (le_refl b)) h }},
rintro (rfl|rfl|⟨ha,hb⟩); simp only [*, mul_lt_omega, omega_pos, _root_.zero_mul, mul_zero]
end
lemma mul_lt_omega_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < omega ↔ a < omega ∧ b < omega :=
by simp [mul_lt_omega_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_omega {a b : cardinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a ^ b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
lemma eq_one_iff_subsingleton_and_nonempty {α : Type*} :
mk α = 1 ↔ (subsingleton α ∧ nonempty α) :=
calc mk α = 1 ↔ mk α ≤ 1 ∧ ¬mk α < 1 : eq_iff_le_not_lt
... ↔ subsingleton α ∧ nonempty α :
begin
apply and_congr le_one_iff_subsingleton,
push_neg,
rw [one_le_iff_ne_zero, ne_zero_iff_nonempty]
end
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : infinite α ↔ omega ≤ mk α :=
by rw [←not_lt, lt_omega_iff_fintype, not_nonempty_fintype]
lemma countable_iff (s : set α) : countable s ↔ mk s ≤ omega :=
begin
rw [countable_iff_exists_injective], split,
rintro ⟨f, hf⟩, exact ⟨embedding.trans ⟨f, hf⟩ equiv.ulift.symm.to_embedding⟩,
rintro ⟨f'⟩, cases embedding.trans f' equiv.ulift.to_embedding with f hf, exact ⟨f, hf⟩
end
lemma denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : nonempty (denumerable α) ↔ mk α = omega :=
⟨λ⟨h⟩, quotient.sound $ by exactI ⟨ (denumerable.eqv α).trans equiv.ulift.symm ⟩,
λ h, by { cases quotient.exact h with f, exact ⟨denumerable.mk' $ f.trans equiv.ulift⟩ }⟩
lemma mk_int : mk ℤ = omega :=
denumerable_iff.mp ⟨by apply_instance⟩
lemma mk_pnat : mk ℕ+ = omega :=
denumerable_iff.mp ⟨by apply_instance⟩
lemma two_le_iff : (2 : cardinal) ≤ mk α ↔ ∃x y : α, x ≠ y :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨f⟩, refine ⟨f $ sum.inl ⟨⟩, f $ sum.inr ⟨⟩, _⟩, intro h, cases f.2 h },
{ rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩, by_contra h',
rw [not_le, ←nat.cast_two, nat_succ, lt_succ, nat.cast_one, le_one_iff_subsingleton] at h',
apply h, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _ }
end
lemma two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : cardinal) ≤ mk α ↔ ∃y : α, x ≠ y :=
begin
rw [two_le_iff],
split,
{ rintro ⟨y, z, h⟩, refine classical.by_cases (λ(h' : x = y), _) (λ h', ⟨y, h'⟩),
rw [←h'] at h, exact ⟨z, h⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨y, h⟩, exact ⟨x, y, h⟩ }
end
/-- König's theorem -/
theorem sum_lt_prod {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i < g i) : sum f < prod g :=
lt_of_not_ge $ λ ⟨F⟩, begin
have : inhabited (Π (i : ι), (g i).out),
{ refine ⟨λ i, classical.choice $ ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 _⟩,
rw mk_out,
exact ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) (H i)) }, resetI,
let G := inv_fun F,
have sG : surjective G := inv_fun_surjective F.2,
choose C hc using show ∀ i, ∃ b, ∀ a, G ⟨i, a⟩ i ≠ b,
{ assume i,
simp only [- not_exists, not_exists.symm, classical.not_forall.symm],
refine λ h, not_le_of_lt (H i) _,
rw [← mk_out (f i), ← mk_out (g i)],
exact ⟨embedding.of_surjective _ h⟩ },
exact (let ⟨⟨i, a⟩, h⟩ := sG C in hc i a (congr_fun h _))
end
@[simp] theorem mk_empty : mk empty = 0 :=
fintype_card empty
@[simp] theorem mk_pempty : mk pempty = 0 :=
fintype_card pempty
@[simp] theorem mk_plift_of_false {p : Prop} (h : ¬ p) : mk (plift p) = 0 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.plift.trans $ equiv.equiv_pempty h⟩
theorem mk_unit : mk unit = 1 :=
(fintype_card unit).trans nat.cast_one
@[simp] theorem mk_punit : mk punit = 1 :=
(fintype_card punit).trans nat.cast_one
@[simp] theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : mk ({x} : set α) = 1 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.set.singleton x⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_plift_of_true {p : Prop} (h : p) : mk (plift p) = 1 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.plift.trans $ equiv.prop_equiv_punit h⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_bool : mk bool = 2 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_Prop : mk Prop = 2 :=
(quotient.sound ⟨equiv.Prop_equiv_bool⟩ : mk Prop = mk bool).trans mk_bool
@[simp] theorem mk_option {α : Type u} : mk (option α) = mk α + 1 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit α⟩
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : mk (list α) = sum (λ n : ℕ, (mk α)^(n:cardinal.{u})) :=
calc mk (list α)
= mk (Σ n, vector α n) : quotient.sound ⟨(equiv.sigma_preimage_equiv list.length).symm⟩
... = mk (Σ n, fin n → α) : quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sigma_congr_right $ λ n,
⟨vector.nth, vector.of_fn, vector.of_fn_nth, λ f, funext $ vector.nth_of_fn f⟩⟩
... = mk (Σ n : ℕ, ulift.{u} (fin n) → α) : quotient.sound ⟨equiv.sigma_congr_right $ λ n,
equiv.arrow_congr equiv.ulift.symm (equiv.refl α)⟩
... = sum (λ n : ℕ, (mk α)^(n:cardinal.{u})) : by simp only [(lift_mk_fin _).symm, lift_mk, power_def, sum_mk]
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : mk (quot r) ≤ mk α :=
mk_le_of_surjective quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : setoid α} : mk (quotient s) ≤ mk α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) : mk (subtype p) ≤ mk α :=
⟨embedding.subtype p⟩
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
mk (subtype p) ≤ mk (subtype q) :=
⟨embedding.subtype_map (embedding.refl α) h⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_emptyc (α : Type u) : mk (∅ : set α) = 0 :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.set.pempty α⟩
lemma mk_emptyc_iff {α : Type u} {s : set α} : mk s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have h2 : cardinal.mk s = cardinal.mk pempty, by simp [h],
refine set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr (λ _ hx, _),
rcases cardinal.eq.mp h2 with ⟨f, _⟩,
cases f ⟨_, hx⟩ },
{ intro, convert mk_emptyc _ }
end
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : mk (@univ α) = mk α :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.set.univ α⟩
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : set α} : mk (f '' s) ≤ mk s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
lift.{v u} (mk (f '' s)) ≤ lift.{u v} (mk s) :=
lift_mk_le.{v u 0}.mpr ⟨embedding.of_surjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : mk (range f) ≤ mk α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
lemma mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : injective f) : mk (range f) = mk α :=
quotient.sound ⟨(equiv.set.range f h).symm⟩
lemma mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) :
lift.{v u} (mk (range f)) = lift.{u v} (mk α) :=
begin
have := (@lift_mk_eq.{v u max u v} (range f) α).2 ⟨(equiv.set.range f hf).symm⟩,
simp only [lift_umax.{u v}, lift_umax.{v u}] at this,
exact this
end
lemma mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) :
lift.{v (max u w)} (# (range f)) = lift.{u (max v w)} (# α) :=
lift_mk_eq.mpr ⟨(equiv.set.range f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : set α} (hf : injective f) :
mk (f '' s) = mk s :=
quotient.sound ⟨(equiv.set.image f s hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_Union_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → set α} : mk (⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum (λ i, mk (f i)) :=
calc mk (⋃ i, f i) ≤ mk (Σ i, f i) : mk_le_of_surjective (set.sigma_to_Union_surjective f)
... = sum (λ i, mk (f i)) : (sum_mk _).symm
theorem mk_Union_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (f i) (f j)) :
mk (⋃ i, f i) = sum (λ i, mk (f i)) :=
calc mk (⋃ i, f i) = mk (Σi, f i) : quot.sound ⟨set.Union_eq_sigma_of_disjoint h⟩
... = sum (λi, mk (f i)) : (sum_mk _).symm
lemma mk_Union_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → set α) :
mk (⋃ i, f i) ≤ mk ι * cardinal.sup.{u u} (λ i, mk (f i)) :=
le_trans mk_Union_le_sum_mk (sum_le_sup _)
lemma mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : set (set α)) :
mk (⋃₀ A) ≤ mk A * cardinal.sup.{u u} (λ s : A, mk s) :=
by { rw [sUnion_eq_Union], apply mk_Union_le }
lemma mk_bUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → set α) (s : set ι) :
mk (⋃(x ∈ s), A x) ≤ mk s * cardinal.sup.{u u} (λ x : s, mk (A x.1)) :=
by { rw [bUnion_eq_Union], apply mk_Union_le }
@[simp] lemma finset_card {α : Type u} {s : finset α} : ↑(finset.card s) = mk (↑s : set α) :=
by rw [fintype_card, nat_cast_inj, fintype.card_coe]
lemma finset_card_lt_omega (s : finset α) : mk (↑s : set α) < omega :=
by { rw [lt_omega_iff_fintype], exact ⟨finset.subtype.fintype s⟩ }
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : set α} :
mk (S ∪ T : set α) + mk (S ∩ T : set α) = mk S + mk T :=
quot.sound ⟨equiv.set.union_sum_inter S T⟩
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : set α} (H : disjoint S T) :
mk (S ∪ T : set α) = mk S + mk T :=
quot.sound ⟨equiv.set.union H⟩
lemma mk_sum_compl {α} (s : set α) : #s + #(-s : set α) = #α :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.set.sum_compl s⟩
lemma mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : mk s ≤ mk t :=
⟨set.embedding_of_subset s t h⟩
lemma mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀x, p x → q x) : mk {x // p x} ≤ mk {x // q x} :=
⟨embedding_of_subset _ _ h⟩
lemma mk_set_le (s : set α) : mk s ≤ mk α :=
mk_subtype_le s
lemma mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : injective f) :
lift.{v u} (mk (f '' s)) = lift.{u v} (mk s) :=
lift_mk_eq.{v u 0}.mpr ⟨(equiv.set.image f s h).symm⟩
lemma mk_image_eq_of_inj_on_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set α)
(h : inj_on f s) : lift.{v u} (mk (f '' s)) = lift.{u v} (mk s) :=
lift_mk_eq.{v u 0}.mpr ⟨(equiv.set.image_of_inj_on f s h).symm⟩
lemma mk_image_eq_of_inj_on {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : inj_on f s) :
mk (f '' s) = mk s :=
quotient.sound ⟨(equiv.set.image_of_inj_on f s h).symm⟩
lemma mk_subtype_of_equiv {α β : Type u} (p : β → Prop) (e : α ≃ β) :
mk {a : α // p (e a)} = mk {b : β // p b} :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype e⟩
lemma mk_sep (s : set α) (t : α → Prop) : mk ({ x ∈ s | t x } : set α) = mk { x : s | t x.1 } :=
quotient.sound ⟨equiv.set.sep s t⟩
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : injective f) : lift.{u v} (mk (f ⁻¹' s)) ≤ lift.{v u} (mk s) :=
begin
rw lift_mk_le.{u v 0}, use subtype.coind (λ x, f x.1) (λ x, x.2),
apply subtype.coind_injective, exact h.comp subtype.val_injective
end
lemma mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v u} (mk s) ≤ lift.{u v} (mk (f ⁻¹' s)) :=
begin
rw lift_mk_le.{v u 0},
refine ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ rintro ⟨y, hy⟩, rcases classical.subtype_of_exists (h hy) with ⟨x, rfl⟩, exact ⟨x, hy⟩ },
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨y', hy'⟩, dsimp,
rcases classical.subtype_of_exists (h hy) with ⟨x, rfl⟩,
rcases classical.subtype_of_exists (h hy') with ⟨x', rfl⟩,
simp, intro hxx', rw hxx'
end
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u v} (mk (f ⁻¹' s)) = lift.{v u} (mk s) :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : set β) (h : injective f) :
mk (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ mk s :=
by { convert mk_preimage_of_injective_lift.{u u} f s h using 1; rw [lift_id] }
lemma mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : mk s ≤ mk (f ⁻¹' s) :=
by { convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift.{u u} f s h using 1; rw [lift_id] }
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : mk (f ⁻¹' s) = mk s :=
by { convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u u} f s h h2 using 1; rw [lift_id] }
lemma mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : set α}
{t : set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
lift.{v u} (mk t) ≤ lift.{u v} (mk ({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : set α)) :=
by { rw [image_eq_range] at h, convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1, rw [mk_sep], refl }
lemma mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : set α} {t : set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
mk t ≤ mk ({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : set α) :=
by { rw [image_eq_range] at h, convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1, rw [mk_sep], refl }
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : set α} :
c ≤ mk s ↔ ∃ p : set α, p ⊆ s ∧ mk p = c :=
begin
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ←subtype.exists_set_subtype],
apply exists_congr, intro t, rw [mk_image_eq], apply subtype.val_injective
end
/-- The function α^{<β}, defined to be sup_{γ < β} α^γ.
We index over {s : set β.out // mk s < β } instead of {γ // γ < β}, because the latter lives in a
higher universe -/
noncomputable def powerlt (α β : cardinal.{u}) : cardinal.{u} :=
sup.{u u} (λ(s : {s : set β.out // mk s < β}), α ^ mk.{u} s)
infix ` ^< `:80 := powerlt
theorem powerlt_aux {c c' : cardinal} (h : c < c') :
∃(s : {s : set c'.out // mk s < c'}), mk s = c :=
begin
cases out_embedding.mp (le_of_lt h) with f,
have : mk ↥(range ⇑f) = c, { rwa [mk_range_eq, mk, quotient.out_eq c], exact f.2 },
exact ⟨⟨range f, by convert h⟩, this⟩
end
lemma le_powerlt {c₁ c₂ c₃ : cardinal} (h : c₂ < c₃) : c₁ ^ c₂ ≤ c₁ ^< c₃ :=
by { rcases powerlt_aux h with ⟨s, rfl⟩, apply le_sup _ s }
lemma powerlt_le {c₁ c₂ c₃ : cardinal} : c₁ ^< c₂ ≤ c₃ ↔ ∀(c₄ < c₂), c₁ ^ c₄ ≤ c₃ :=
begin
rw [powerlt, sup_le],
split,
{ intros h c₄ hc₄, rcases powerlt_aux hc₄ with ⟨s, rfl⟩, exact h s },
intros h s, exact h _ s.2
end
lemma powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
by { rw [powerlt, sup_le], rintro ⟨s, hs⟩, apply le_powerlt, exact lt_of_lt_of_le hs h }
lemma powerlt_succ {c₁ c₂ : cardinal} (h : c₁ ≠ 0) : c₁ ^< c₂.succ = c₁ ^ c₂ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw powerlt_le, intros c₃ h2, apply power_le_power_left h, rwa [←lt_succ] },
{ apply le_powerlt, apply lt_succ_self }
end
lemma powerlt_max {c₁ c₂ c₃ : cardinal} : c₁ ^< max c₂ c₃ = max (c₁ ^< c₂) (c₁ ^< c₃) :=
by { cases le_total c₂ c₃; simp only [max_eq_left, max_eq_right, h, powerlt_le_powerlt_left] }
lemma zero_powerlt {a : cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [powerlt_le], intros c hc, apply zero_power_le },
convert le_powerlt (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h), rw [power_zero]
end
lemma powerlt_zero {a : cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 :=
by { apply sup_eq_zero, rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, rw [←not_le] at hx, apply hx, apply zero_le }
end cardinal
|
f5cbf757640ea0e6c10fd4b88e67a4118eed9caf | a721fe7446524f18ba361625fc01033d9c8b7a78 | /elaborate/append_init_last_nat.lean | 1fb9d286a15d1cbdcecbf0133c95b2eff9624ca9 | [] | no_license | Sterrs/leaning | 8fd80d1f0a6117a220bb2e57ece639b9a63deadc | 3901cc953694b33adda86cb88ca30ba99594db31 | refs/heads/master | 1,627,023,822,744 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 245,512,190 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,616,429,050,000 | 1,583,527,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 39,023 | lean | λ {lst : mylist mynat} (h : lst = empty → false),
mylist.rec
(λ (h : empty = empty → false),
false.rec (false.rec (mylist mynat) (h (eq.refl empty)) ++ false.rec mynat (h (eq.refl empty)) :: empty = empty)
(h (eq.refl empty)))
(λ (lst_head : mynat) (lst_tail : mylist mynat)
(lst_ih : ∀ (h : lst_tail = empty → false), init lst_tail h ++ last lst_tail h :: empty = lst_tail)
(h : lst_head :: lst_tail = empty → false),
mylist.rec
(λ
(lst_ih :
∀ (h : empty = empty → false),
false.rec (mylist mynat) (h (eq.refl empty)) ++ false.rec mynat (h (eq.refl empty)) :: empty = empty)
(h : lst_head :: empty = empty → false),
eq.rec true.intro
(eq.rec (eq.refl (lst_head :: empty = lst_head :: empty))
(eq.rec
(eq.rec
(eq.rec (eq.refl (lst_head :: empty = lst_head :: empty))
(propext
{mp := λ (h : lst_head :: empty = lst_head :: empty),
⟨eq.refl lst_head, eq.refl empty⟩,
mpr := λ (a : lst_head = lst_head ∧ empty = empty),
and.rec
(λ (left : lst_head = lst_head) (right : empty = empty)
(«_» : lst_head = lst_head ∧ empty = empty), eq.refl (lst_head :: empty))
a
a}))
(eq.rec
(eq.rec (eq.refl (lst_head = lst_head ∧ empty = empty))
(propext
{mp := λ (hl : empty = empty), true.intro, mpr := λ (hr : true), eq.refl empty}))
(eq.rec (eq.refl (and (lst_head = lst_head)))
(propext
{mp := λ (hl : lst_head = lst_head), true.intro,
mpr := λ (hr : true), eq.refl lst_head}))))
(propext {mp := and.left true, mpr := λ (h : true), ⟨h, h⟩}))))
(λ (head : mynat) (tail : mylist mynat)
(ih :
(∀ (h : tail = empty → false), init tail h ++ last tail h :: empty = tail) →
∀ (h : lst_head :: tail = empty → false),
init (lst_head :: tail) h ++ last (lst_head :: tail) h :: empty = lst_head :: tail)
(lst_ih :
∀ (h : head :: tail = empty → false),
init (head :: tail) h ++ last (head :: tail) h :: empty = head :: tail)
(h : lst_head :: head :: tail = empty → false),
eq.rec
(lst_ih
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec (λ (h11 : empty = empty) (a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a) H_1 H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)))
(eq.rec
(eq.refl
(lst_head ::
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec (λ (h11 : empty = empty) (a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec (λ (h11 : empty = empty) (a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty) =
lst_head :: head :: tail))
(eq.rec
(eq.rec
(eq.rec
(eq.refl
(lst_head ::
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty) (a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false),
a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty) =
lst_head :: head :: tail))
(propext
{mp := λ
(h :
lst_head ::
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty) =
lst_head :: head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ
(h11 :
lst_head ::
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty) =
lst_head ::
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty))
(a :
lst_head = lst_head →
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty →
lst_head = lst_head ∧
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
head :: tail),
a (eq.refl lst_head)
(eq.refl
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty)))
h
h
(λ (head_eq : lst_head = lst_head)
(tail_eq :
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
head :: tail), ⟨head_eq, tail_eq⟩),
mpr := λ
(a :
lst_head = lst_head ∧
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
head :: tail),
and.rec
(λ (left : lst_head = lst_head)
(right :
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
head :: tail)
(«_» :
lst_head = lst_head ∧
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
head :: tail),
eq.rec
(eq.refl
(lst_head ::
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail)
(H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty)))
right)
a
a}))
(eq.rec
(eq.refl
(lst_head = lst_head ∧
init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty) (a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false),
a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty) (a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false),
a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
head :: tail))
(eq.rec (eq.refl (and (lst_head = lst_head)))
(propext
{mp := λ (hl : lst_head = lst_head), true.intro,
mpr := λ (hr : true), eq.refl lst_head}))))
(propext
{mp := and.right
(init (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty) (a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false),
a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ++
last (head :: tail)
(λ (h : head :: tail = empty),
eq.rec
(λ («_» : head :: tail = head :: tail) (H_1 : empty = head :: tail),
eq.rec
(λ (h11 : empty = empty)
(a : h == eq.refl (head :: tail) → false), a)
H_1
H_1)
h
h
(eq.refl empty)
(heq.refl h)) ::
empty =
head :: tail),
mpr := and.intro true.intro}))))
lst_tail
lst_ih
h)
lst
h
|
a7d62cc4894cb5d780f5ffdd751acb2b8605a696 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/geometry/euclidean/inversion.lean | 0ad5c99bb4357a18e2f97ca749056afc5d44c7e2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,370 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import geometry.euclidean.basic
/-!
# Inversion in an affine space
In this file we define inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to
the point `y` such that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center
and the radius the sphere.
In many applications, it is convenient to assume that the inversions swaps the center and the point
at infinity. In order to stay in the original affine space, we define the map so that it sends
center to itself.
Currently, we prove only a few basic lemmas needed to prove Ptolemy's inequality, see
`euclidean_geometry.mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open metric real function
namespace euclidean_geometry
variables {V P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P] [normed_add_torsor V P]
{a b c d x y z : P} {R : ℝ}
include V
/-- Inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to the point `y` such
that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center and the radius the
sphere. -/
def inversion (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) : P := (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) +ᵥ c
lemma inversion_vsub_center (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c R x -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) :=
vadd_vsub _ _
@[simp] lemma inversion_self (c : P) (R : ℝ) : inversion c R c = c := by simp [inversion]
@[simp] lemma inversion_dist_center (c x : P) : inversion c (dist x c) x = x :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne x c with rfl|hne,
{ apply inversion_self },
{ rw [inversion, div_self, one_pow, one_smul, vsub_vadd],
rwa [dist_ne_zero] }
end
lemma inversion_of_mem_sphere (h : x ∈ sphere c R) : inversion c R x = x :=
h.out ▸ inversion_dist_center c x
/-- Distance from the image of a point under inversion to the center. This formula accidentally
works for `x = c`. -/
lemma dist_inversion_center (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist (inversion c R x) c = R ^ 2 / dist x c :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl|hx), { simp },
have : dist x c ≠ 0, from dist_ne_zero.2 hx,
field_simp [inversion, norm_smul, abs_div, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, sq, mul_assoc]
end
/-- Distance from the center of an inversion to the image of a point under the inversion. This
formula accidentally works for `x = c`. -/
lemma dist_center_inversion (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist c (inversion c R x) = R ^ 2 / dist c x :=
by rw [dist_comm c, dist_comm c, dist_inversion_center]
@[simp] lemma inversion_inversion (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) (x : P) :
inversion c R (inversion c R x) = x :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne x c with rfl|hne,
{ rw [inversion_self, inversion_self] },
{ rw [inversion, dist_inversion_center, inversion_vsub_center, smul_smul, ← mul_pow,
div_mul_div_comm, div_mul_cancel _ (dist_ne_zero.2 hne), ← sq, div_self, one_pow, one_smul,
vsub_vadd],
exact pow_ne_zero _ hR }
end
lemma inversion_involutive (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : involutive (inversion c R) :=
inversion_inversion c hR
lemma inversion_surjective (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : surjective (inversion c R) :=
(inversion_involutive c hR).surjective
lemma inversion_injective (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : injective (inversion c R) :=
(inversion_involutive c hR).injective
lemma inversion_bijective (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : bijective (inversion c R) :=
(inversion_involutive c hR).bijective
/-- Distance between the images of two points under an inversion. -/
lemma dist_inversion_inversion (hx : x ≠ c) (hy : y ≠ c) (R : ℝ) :
dist (inversion c R x) (inversion c R y) = (R ^ 2 / (dist x c * dist y c)) * dist x y :=
begin
dunfold inversion,
simp_rw [dist_vadd_cancel_right, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ c],
simpa only [dist_vsub_cancel_right]
using dist_div_norm_sq_smul (vsub_ne_zero.2 hx) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hy) R
end
/-- **Ptolemy's inequality**: in a quadrangle `ABCD`, `|AC| * |BD| ≤ |AB| * |CD| + |BC| * |AD|`. If
`ABCD` is a convex cyclic polygon, then this inequality becomes an equality, see
`euclidean_geometry.mul_dist_add_mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical`. -/
lemma mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist (a b c d : P) :
dist a c * dist b d ≤ dist a b * dist c d + dist b c * dist a d :=
begin
-- If one of the points `b`, `c`, `d` is equal to `a`, then the inequality is trivial.
rcases eq_or_ne b a with rfl|hb,
{ rw [dist_self, zero_mul, zero_add] },
rcases eq_or_ne c a with rfl|hc,
{ rw [dist_self, zero_mul],
apply_rules [add_nonneg, mul_nonneg, dist_nonneg] },
rcases eq_or_ne d a with rfl|hd,
{ rw [dist_self, mul_zero, add_zero, dist_comm d, dist_comm d, mul_comm] },
/- Otherwise, we apply the triangle inequality to `euclidean_geometry.inversion a 1 b`,
`euclidean_geometry.inversion a 1 c`, and `euclidean_geometry.inversion a 1 d`. -/
have H := dist_triangle (inversion a 1 b) (inversion a 1 c) (inversion a 1 d),
rw [dist_inversion_inversion hb hd, dist_inversion_inversion hb hc,
dist_inversion_inversion hc hd, one_pow] at H,
rw [← dist_pos] at hb hc hd,
rw [← div_le_div_right (mul_pos hb (mul_pos hc hd))],
convert H; { field_simp [hb.ne', hc.ne', hd.ne', dist_comm a], ring }
end
end euclidean_geometry
|
c259e5b81def8390e8efbce32ef0574d6e2ac486 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebra/lie/engel.lean | 78ba41c33c521738a658ca087a646f9126bfdc6b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,623 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import algebra.lie.nilpotent
import algebra.lie.centralizer
/-!
# Engel's theorem
This file contains a proof of Engel's theorem providing necessary and sufficient conditions for Lie
algebras and Lie modules to be nilpotent.
The key result `lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff_forall` says that if `M` is a Lie module of a
Noetherian Lie algebra `L`, then `M` is nilpotent iff the image of `L → End(M)` consists of
nilpotent elements. In the special case that we have the adjoint representation `M = L`, this says
that a Lie algebra is nilpotent iff `ad x : End(L)` is nilpotent for all `x : L`.
Engel's theorem is true for any coefficients (i.e., it is really a theorem about Lie rings) and so
we work with coefficients in any commutative ring `R` throughout.
On the other hand, Engel's theorem is not true for infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and so a
finite-dimensionality assumption is required. We prove the theorem subject to the the assumption
that the Lie algebra is Noetherian as an `R`-module, though actually we only need the slightly
weaker property that the relation `>` is well-founded on the complete lattice of Lie subalgebras.
## Remarks about the proof
Engel's theorem is usually proved in the special case that the coefficients are a field, and uses
an inductive argument on the dimension of the Lie algebra. One begins by choosing either a maximal
proper Lie subalgebra (in some proofs) or a maximal nilpotent Lie subalgebra (in other proofs, at
the cost of obtaining a weaker end result).
Since we work with general coefficients, we cannot induct on dimension and an alternate approach
must be taken. The key ingredient is the concept of nilpotency, not just for Lie algebras, but for
Lie modules. Using this concept, we define an _Engelian Lie algebra_ `lie_algebra.is_engelian` to
be one for which a Lie module is nilpotent whenever the action consists of nilpotent endomorphisms.
The argument then proceeds by selecting a maximal Engelian Lie subalgebra and showing that it cannot
be proper.
The first part of the traditional statement of Engel's theorem consists of the statement that if `M`
is a non-trivial `R`-module and `L ⊆ End(M)` is a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra of nilpotent
elements, then there exists a non-zero element `m : M` that is annihilated by every element of `L`.
This follows trivially from the result established here `lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff_forall`, that
`M` is a nilpotent Lie module over `L`, since the last non-zero term in the lower central series
will consist of such elements `m` (see: `lie_module.nontrivial_max_triv_of_is_nilpotent`). It seems
that this result has not previously been established at this level of generality.
The second part of the traditional statement of Engel's theorem concerns nilpotency of the Lie
algebra and a proof of this for general coefficients appeared in the literature as long ago
[as 1937](zorn1937). This also follows trivially from `lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff_forall` simply by
taking `M = L`.
It is pleasing that the two parts of the traditional statements of Engel's theorem are thus unified
into a single statement about nilpotency of Lie modules. This is not usually emphasised.
## Main definitions
* `lie_algebra.is_engelian`
* `lie_algebra.is_engelian_of_is_noetherian`
* `lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff_forall`
* `lie_algebra.is_nilpotent_iff_forall`
-/
universes u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variables {R : Type u₁} {L : Type u₂} {L₂ : Type u₃} {M : Type u₄}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L] [lie_ring L₂] [lie_algebra R L₂]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
include R L
namespace lie_submodule
open lie_module
variables {I : lie_ideal R L} {x : L} (hxI : (R ∙ x) ⊔ I = ⊤)
include hxI
lemma exists_smul_add_of_span_sup_eq_top (y : L) : ∃ (t : R) (z ∈ I), y = t • x + z :=
begin
have hy : y ∈ (⊤ : submodule R L) := submodule.mem_top,
simp only [← hxI, submodule.mem_sup, submodule.mem_span_singleton] at hy,
obtain ⟨-, ⟨t, rfl⟩, z, hz, rfl⟩ := hy,
exact ⟨t, z, hz, rfl⟩,
end
lemma lie_top_eq_of_span_sup_eq_top (N : lie_submodule R L M) :
(↑⁅(⊤ : lie_ideal R L), N⁆ : submodule R M) =
(N : submodule R M).map (to_endomorphism R L M x) ⊔ (↑⁅I, N⁆ : submodule R M) :=
begin
simp only [lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span', submodule.sup_span, mem_top, exists_prop,
exists_true_left, submodule.map_coe, to_endomorphism_apply_apply],
refine le_antisymm (submodule.span_le.mpr _) (submodule.span_mono (λ z hz, _)),
{ rintros z ⟨y, n, hn : n ∈ N, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨t, z, hz, rfl⟩ := exists_smul_add_of_span_sup_eq_top hxI y,
simp only [set_like.mem_coe, submodule.span_union, submodule.mem_sup],
exact ⟨t • ⁅x, n⁆, submodule.subset_span ⟨t • n, N.smul_mem' t hn, lie_smul t x n⟩,
⁅z, n⁆, submodule.subset_span ⟨z, hz, n, hn, rfl⟩, by simp⟩, },
{ rcases hz with ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩ | ⟨y, hy, m, hm, rfl⟩,
exacts [⟨x, m, hm, rfl⟩, ⟨y, m, hm, rfl⟩], },
end
lemma lcs_le_lcs_of_is_nilpotent_span_sup_eq_top {n i j : ℕ} (hxn : (to_endomorphism R L M x)^n = 0)
(hIM : lower_central_series R L M i ≤ I.lcs M j) :
lower_central_series R L M (i + n) ≤ I.lcs M (j + 1) :=
begin
suffices : ∀ l, ((⊤ : lie_ideal R L).lcs M (i + l) : submodule R M) ≤
(I.lcs M j : submodule R M).map
((to_endomorphism R L M x)^l) ⊔ (I.lcs M (j + 1) : submodule R M),
{ simpa only [bot_sup_eq, lie_ideal.incl_coe, submodule.map_zero, hxn] using this n, },
intros l,
induction l with l ih,
{ simp only [add_zero, lie_ideal.lcs_succ, pow_zero, linear_map.one_eq_id, submodule.map_id],
exact le_sup_of_le_left hIM, },
{ simp only [lie_ideal.lcs_succ, i.add_succ l, lie_top_eq_of_span_sup_eq_top hxI, sup_le_iff],
refine ⟨(submodule.map_mono ih).trans _, le_sup_of_le_right _⟩,
{ rw [submodule.map_sup, ← submodule.map_comp, ← linear_map.mul_eq_comp, ← pow_succ,
← I.lcs_succ],
exact sup_le_sup_left coe_map_to_endomorphism_le _, },
{ refine le_trans (mono_lie_right _ _ I _) (mono_lie_right _ _ I hIM),
exact antitone_lower_central_series R L M le_self_add, }, },
end
lemma is_nilpotent_of_is_nilpotent_span_sup_eq_top
(hnp : is_nilpotent $ to_endomorphism R L M x) (hIM : is_nilpotent R I M) :
is_nilpotent R L M :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hnp,
unfreezingI { obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hIM, },
have hk' : I.lcs M k = ⊥,
{ simp only [← coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, I.coe_lcs_eq, hk, bot_coe_submodule], },
suffices : ∀ l, lower_central_series R L M (l * n) ≤ I.lcs M l,
{ use k * n,
simpa [hk'] using this k, },
intros l,
induction l with l ih,
{ simp, },
{ exact (l.succ_mul n).symm ▸ lcs_le_lcs_of_is_nilpotent_span_sup_eq_top hxI hn ih, },
end
end lie_submodule
section lie_algebra
open lie_module (hiding is_nilpotent)
variables (R L)
/-- A Lie algebra `L` is said to be Engelian if a sufficient condition for any `L`-Lie module `M` to
be nilpotent is that the image of the map `L → End(M)` consists of nilpotent elements.
Engel's theorem `lie_algebra.is_engelian_of_is_noetherian` states that any Noetherian Lie algebra is
Engelian. -/
def lie_algebra.is_engelian : Prop :=
∀ (M : Type u₄) [add_comm_group M], by exactI ∀ [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M], by exactI ∀
[lie_module R L M], by exactI ∀ (h : ∀ (x : L), is_nilpotent (to_endomorphism R L M x)),
lie_module.is_nilpotent R L M
variables {R L}
lemma lie_algebra.is_engelian_of_subsingleton [subsingleton L] : lie_algebra.is_engelian R L :=
begin
intros M _i1 _i2 _i3 _i4 h,
use 1,
suffices : (⊤ : lie_ideal R L) = ⊥, { simp [this], },
haveI := (lie_submodule.subsingleton_iff R L L).mpr infer_instance,
apply subsingleton.elim,
end
lemma function.surjective.is_engelian
{f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂} (hf : function.surjective f) (h : lie_algebra.is_engelian.{u₁ u₂ u₄} R L) :
lie_algebra.is_engelian.{u₁ u₃ u₄} R L₂ :=
begin
introsI M _i1 _i2 _i3 _i4 h',
letI : lie_ring_module L M := lie_ring_module.comp_lie_hom M f,
letI : lie_module R L M := comp_lie_hom M f,
have hnp : ∀ x, is_nilpotent (to_endomorphism R L M x) := λ x, h' (f x),
have surj_id : function.surjective (linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) := function.surjective_id,
haveI : lie_module.is_nilpotent R L M := h M hnp,
apply hf.lie_module_is_nilpotent surj_id,
simp,
end
lemma lie_equiv.is_engelian_iff (e : L ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) :
lie_algebra.is_engelian.{u₁ u₂ u₄} R L ↔ lie_algebra.is_engelian.{u₁ u₃ u₄} R L₂ :=
⟨e.surjective.is_engelian, e.symm.surjective.is_engelian⟩
lemma lie_algebra.exists_engelian_lie_subalgebra_of_lt_normalizer
{K : lie_subalgebra R L} (hK₁ : lie_algebra.is_engelian.{u₁ u₂ u₄} R K) (hK₂ : K < K.normalizer) :
∃ (K' : lie_subalgebra R L) (hK' : lie_algebra.is_engelian.{u₁ u₂ u₄} R K'), K < K' :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := set_like.exists_of_lt hK₂,
let K' : lie_subalgebra R L :=
{ lie_mem' := λ y z, lie_subalgebra.lie_mem_sup_of_mem_normalizer hx₁,
.. (R ∙ x) ⊔ (K : submodule R L) },
have hxK' : x ∈ K' := submodule.mem_sup_left (submodule.subset_span (set.mem_singleton _)),
have hKK' : K ≤ K' := (lie_subalgebra.coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule K K').mp le_sup_right,
have hK' : K' ≤ K.normalizer,
{ rw ← lie_subalgebra.coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule,
exact sup_le ((submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem _ _).mpr hx₁) hK₂.le, },
refine ⟨K', _, lt_iff_le_and_ne.mpr ⟨hKK', λ contra, hx₂ (contra.symm ▸ hxK')⟩⟩,
introsI M _i1 _i2 _i3 _i4 h,
obtain ⟨I, hI₁ : (I : lie_subalgebra R K') = lie_subalgebra.of_le hKK'⟩ :=
lie_subalgebra.exists_nested_lie_ideal_of_le_normalizer hKK' hK',
have hI₂ : (R ∙ (⟨x, hxK'⟩ : K')) ⊔ I = ⊤,
{ rw [← lie_ideal.coe_to_lie_subalgebra_to_submodule R K' I, hI₁],
apply submodule.map_injective_of_injective (K' : submodule R L).injective_subtype,
simpa, },
have e : K ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ I := (lie_subalgebra.equiv_of_le hKK').trans
(lie_equiv.of_eq _ _ ((lie_subalgebra.coe_set_eq _ _).mpr hI₁.symm)),
have hI₃ : lie_algebra.is_engelian R I := e.is_engelian_iff.mp hK₁,
exact lie_submodule.is_nilpotent_of_is_nilpotent_span_sup_eq_top hI₂ (h _) (hI₃ _ (λ x, h x)),
end
local attribute [instance] lie_subalgebra.subsingleton_bot
variables [is_noetherian R L]
/-- *Engel's theorem*.
Note that this implies all traditional forms of Engel's theorem via
`lie_module.nontrivial_max_triv_of_is_nilpotent`, `lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff_forall`,
`lie_algebra.is_nilpotent_iff_forall`. -/
lemma lie_algebra.is_engelian_of_is_noetherian : lie_algebra.is_engelian R L :=
begin
introsI M _i1 _i2 _i3 _i4 h,
rw ← is_nilpotent_range_to_endomorphism_iff,
let L' := (to_endomorphism R L M).range,
replace h : ∀ (y : L'), is_nilpotent (y : module.End R M),
{ rintros ⟨-, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩,
simp [h], },
change lie_module.is_nilpotent R L' M,
let s := { K : lie_subalgebra R L' | lie_algebra.is_engelian R K },
have hs : s.nonempty := ⟨⊥, lie_algebra.is_engelian_of_subsingleton⟩,
suffices : ⊤ ∈ s,
{ rw ← is_nilpotent_of_top_iff,
apply this M,
simp [lie_subalgebra.to_endomorphism_eq, h], },
have : ∀ (K ∈ s), K ≠ ⊤ → ∃ (K' ∈ s), K < K',
{ rintros K (hK₁ : lie_algebra.is_engelian R K) hK₂,
apply lie_algebra.exists_engelian_lie_subalgebra_of_lt_normalizer hK₁,
apply lt_of_le_of_ne K.le_normalizer,
rw [ne.def, eq_comm, K.normalizer_eq_self_iff, ← ne.def,
← lie_submodule.nontrivial_iff_ne_bot R K],
haveI : nontrivial (L' ⧸ K.to_lie_submodule),
{ replace hK₂ : K.to_lie_submodule ≠ ⊤ :=
by rwa [ne.def, ← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, K.coe_to_lie_submodule,
lie_submodule.top_coe_submodule, ← lie_subalgebra.top_coe_submodule,
K.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff],
exact submodule.quotient.nontrivial_of_lt_top _ hK₂.lt_top, },
haveI : lie_module.is_nilpotent R K (L' ⧸ K.to_lie_submodule),
{ refine hK₁ _ (λ x, _),
have hx := lie_algebra.is_nilpotent_ad_of_is_nilpotent (h x),
exact module.End.is_nilpotent.mapq _ hx, },
exact nontrivial_max_triv_of_is_nilpotent R K (L' ⧸ K.to_lie_submodule), },
haveI _i5 : is_noetherian R L' :=
is_noetherian_of_surjective L _ (linear_map.range_range_restrict (to_endomorphism R L M)),
obtain ⟨K, hK₁, hK₂⟩ :=
well_founded.well_founded_iff_has_max'.mp (lie_subalgebra.well_founded_of_noetherian R L') s hs,
have hK₃ : K = ⊤,
{ by_contra contra,
obtain ⟨K', hK'₁, hK'₂⟩ := this K hK₁ contra,
specialize hK₂ K' hK'₁ (le_of_lt hK'₂),
replace hK'₂ := (ne_of_lt hK'₂).symm,
contradiction, },
exact hK₃ ▸ hK₁,
end
/-- Engel's theorem. -/
lemma lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff_forall :
lie_module.is_nilpotent R L M ↔ ∀ x, is_nilpotent $ to_endomorphism R L M x :=
⟨begin
introsI h,
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := nilpotent_endo_of_nilpotent_module R L M,
exact λ x, ⟨k, hk x⟩,
end,
λ h, lie_algebra.is_engelian_of_is_noetherian M h⟩
/-- Engel's theorem. -/
lemma lie_algebra.is_nilpotent_iff_forall :
lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L ↔ ∀ x, is_nilpotent $ lie_algebra.ad R L x :=
lie_module.is_nilpotent_iff_forall
end lie_algebra
|
c937324434db5e6155b33ef60ba49834a1ac5cde | fecda8e6b848337561d6467a1e30cf23176d6ad0 | /src/algebra/group_power/lemmas.lean | e5f001a7bdfac68d7a5f6277d85e4a90200ac5af | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | spolu/mathlib | bacf18c3d2a561d00ecdc9413187729dd1f705ed | 480c92cdfe1cf3c2d083abded87e82162e8814f4 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,684,094,325 | 1,600,736,045,000 | 1,600,736,045,000 | 297,564,749 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,600,758,368,000 | 1,600,758,367,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 34,910 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import algebra.group_power.basic
import algebra.opposites
import data.list.basic
import data.int.cast
import data.equiv.basic
import deprecated.group
/-!
# Lemmas about power operations on monoids and groups
This file contains lemmas about `monoid.pow`, `group.pow`, `nsmul`, `gsmul`
which require additional imports besides those available in `.basic`.
-/
universes u v w x y z u₁ u₂
variables {M : Type u} {N : Type v} {G : Type w} {H : Type x} {A : Type y} {B : Type z}
{R : Type u₁} {S : Type u₂}
/-!
### (Additive) monoid
-/
section monoid
variables [monoid M] [monoid N] [add_monoid A] [add_monoid B]
@[simp] theorem pow_one (a : M) : a^1 = a := mul_one _
@[simp] theorem one_nsmul (a : A) : 1 •ℕ a = a := add_zero _
@[simp] lemma pow_ite (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a : M) (b c : ℕ) :
a ^ (if P then b else c) = if P then a ^ b else a ^ c :=
by split_ifs; refl
@[simp] lemma ite_pow (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a b : M) (c : ℕ) :
(if P then a else b) ^ c = if P then a ^ c else b ^ c :=
by split_ifs; refl
@[simp] lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a : M) :
a ^ (if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem one_pow (n : ℕ) : (1 : M)^n = 1 :=
by induction n with n ih; [refl, rw [pow_succ, ih, one_mul]]
@[simp] theorem nsmul_zero (n : ℕ) : n •ℕ (0 : A) = 0 :=
by induction n with n ih; [refl, rw [succ_nsmul, ih, zero_add]]
theorem pow_mul (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : a^(m * n) = (a^m)^n :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw mul_zero, rw [nat.mul_succ, pow_add, pow_succ', ih]]; refl
theorem mul_nsmul' : ∀ (a : A) (m n : ℕ), m * n •ℕ a = n •ℕ (m •ℕ a) :=
@pow_mul (multiplicative A) _
theorem pow_mul' (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : a^(m * n) = (a^n)^m :=
by rw [mul_comm, pow_mul]
theorem mul_nsmul (a : A) (m n : ℕ) : m * n •ℕ a = m •ℕ (n •ℕ a) :=
@pow_mul' (multiplicative A) _ a m n
theorem pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n :=
by rw [←pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
theorem nsmul_add_sub_nsmul (a : A) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : (m •ℕ a) + ((n - m) •ℕ a) = n •ℕ a :=
@pow_mul_pow_sub (multiplicative A) _ _ _ _ h
theorem pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n :=
by rw [←pow_add, nat.sub_add_cancel h]
theorem sub_nsmul_nsmul_add (a : A) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : ((n - m) •ℕ a) + (m •ℕ a) = n •ℕ a :=
@pow_sub_mul_pow (multiplicative A) _ _ _ _ h
@[simp] theorem nsmul_one [has_one A] : ∀ n : ℕ, n •ℕ (1 : A) = n :=
add_monoid_hom.eq_nat_cast
⟨λ n, n •ℕ (1 : A), zero_nsmul _, λ _ _, add_nsmul _ _ _⟩
(one_nsmul _)
theorem pow_bit0 (a : M) (n : ℕ) : a ^ bit0 n = a^n * a^n := pow_add _ _ _
theorem bit0_nsmul (a : A) (n : ℕ) : bit0 n •ℕ a = n •ℕ a + n •ℕ a := add_nsmul _ _ _
theorem pow_bit1 (a : M) (n : ℕ) : a ^ bit1 n = a^n * a^n * a :=
by rw [bit1, pow_succ', pow_bit0]
theorem bit1_nsmul : ∀ (a : A) (n : ℕ), bit1 n •ℕ a = n •ℕ a + n •ℕ a + a :=
@pow_bit1 (multiplicative A) _
theorem pow_mul_comm (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : a^m * a^n = a^n * a^m :=
commute.pow_pow_self a m n
theorem nsmul_add_comm : ∀ (a : A) (m n : ℕ), m •ℕ a + n •ℕ a = n •ℕ a + m •ℕ a :=
@pow_mul_comm (multiplicative A) _
@[simp, priority 500]
theorem list.prod_repeat (a : M) (n : ℕ) : (list.repeat a n).prod = a ^ n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ refl },
{ rw [list.repeat_succ, list.prod_cons, ih], refl, }
end
@[simp, priority 500]
theorem list.sum_repeat : ∀ (a : A) (n : ℕ), (list.repeat a n).sum = n •ℕ a :=
@list.prod_repeat (multiplicative A) _
theorem monoid_hom.map_pow (f : M →* N) (a : M) : ∀(n : ℕ), f (a ^ n) = (f a) ^ n
| 0 := f.map_one
| (n+1) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, f.map_mul, monoid_hom.map_pow]
theorem add_monoid_hom.map_nsmul (f : A →+ B) (a : A) (n : ℕ) : f (n •ℕ a) = n •ℕ f a :=
f.to_multiplicative.map_pow a n
theorem is_monoid_hom.map_pow (f : M → N) [is_monoid_hom f] (a : M) :
∀(n : ℕ), f (a ^ n) = (f a) ^ n :=
(monoid_hom.of f).map_pow a
theorem is_add_monoid_hom.map_nsmul (f : A → B) [is_add_monoid_hom f] (a : A) (n : ℕ) :
f (n •ℕ a) = n •ℕ f a :=
(add_monoid_hom.of f).map_nsmul a n
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma units.coe_pow (u : units M) (n : ℕ) : ((u ^ n : units M) : M) = u ^ n :=
(units.coe_hom M).map_pow u n
lemma commute.mul_pow {a b : M} (h : commute a b) (n : ℕ) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n :=
nat.rec_on n (by simp) $ λ n ihn,
by simp only [pow_succ, ihn, ← mul_assoc, (h.pow_left n).right_comm]
theorem neg_pow [ring R] (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (- a) ^ n = (-1) ^ n * a ^ n :=
(neg_one_mul a) ▸ (commute.neg_one_left a).mul_pow n
end monoid
theorem nat.nsmul_eq_mul (m n : ℕ) : m •ℕ n = m * n :=
by induction m with m ih; [rw [zero_nsmul, zero_mul],
rw [succ_nsmul', ih, nat.succ_mul]]
/-!
### Commutative (additive) monoid
-/
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid A]
theorem mul_pow (a b : M) (n : ℕ) : (a * b)^n = a^n * b^n :=
(commute.all a b).mul_pow n
theorem nsmul_add : ∀ (a b : A) (n : ℕ), n •ℕ (a + b) = n •ℕ a + n •ℕ b :=
@mul_pow (multiplicative A) _
instance pow.is_monoid_hom (n : ℕ) : is_monoid_hom ((^ n) : M → M) :=
{ map_mul := λ _ _, mul_pow _ _ _, map_one := one_pow _ }
instance nsmul.is_add_monoid_hom (n : ℕ) : is_add_monoid_hom (nsmul n : A → A) :=
{ map_add := λ _ _, nsmul_add _ _ _, map_zero := nsmul_zero _ }
lemma dvd_pow {x y : M} :
∀ {n : ℕ} (hxy : x ∣ y) (hn : n ≠ 0), x ∣ y^n
| 0 hxy hn := (hn rfl).elim
| (n+1) hxy hn := by { rw [pow_succ], exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hxy _ }
end comm_monoid
section group
variables [group G] [group H] [add_group A] [add_group B]
section nat
@[simp] theorem inv_pow (a : G) (n : ℕ) : (a⁻¹)^n = (a^n)⁻¹ :=
by induction n with n ih; [exact one_inv.symm,
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, ih, mul_inv_rev]]
@[simp] theorem neg_nsmul : ∀ (a : A) (n : ℕ), n •ℕ (-a) = -(n •ℕ a) :=
@inv_pow (multiplicative A) _
theorem pow_sub (a : G) {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : a^(m - n) = a^m * (a^n)⁻¹ :=
have h1 : m - n + n = m, from nat.sub_add_cancel h,
have h2 : a^(m - n) * a^n = a^m, by rw [←pow_add, h1],
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h2
theorem nsmul_sub : ∀ (a : A) {m n : ℕ}, n ≤ m → (m - n) •ℕ a = m •ℕ a - n •ℕ a :=
@pow_sub (multiplicative A) _
theorem pow_inv_comm (a : G) (m n : ℕ) : (a⁻¹)^m * a^n = a^n * (a⁻¹)^m :=
(commute.refl a).inv_left.pow_pow m n
theorem nsmul_neg_comm : ∀ (a : A) (m n : ℕ), m •ℕ (-a) + n •ℕ a = n •ℕ a + m •ℕ (-a) :=
@pow_inv_comm (multiplicative A) _
end nat
open int
@[simp] theorem gpow_coe_nat (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n:ℤ) = a ^ n := rfl
@[simp] theorem gsmul_coe_nat (a : A) (n : ℕ) : n •ℤ a = n •ℕ a := rfl
theorem gpow_of_nat (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ of_nat n = a ^ n := rfl
theorem gsmul_of_nat (a : A) (n : ℕ) : of_nat n •ℤ a = n •ℕ a := rfl
@[simp] theorem gpow_neg_succ_of_nat (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ -[1+n] = (a ^ n.succ)⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] theorem gsmul_neg_succ_of_nat (a : A) (n : ℕ) : -[1+n] •ℤ a = - (n.succ •ℕ a) := rfl
local attribute [ematch] le_of_lt
open nat
@[simp] theorem gpow_zero (a : G) : a ^ (0:ℤ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_gsmul (a : A) : (0:ℤ) •ℤ a = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem gpow_one (a : G) : a ^ (1:ℤ) = a := pow_one a
@[simp] theorem one_gsmul (a : A) : (1:ℤ) •ℤ a = a := add_zero _
@[simp] theorem one_gpow : ∀ (n : ℤ), (1 : G) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) := one_pow _
| -[1+ n] := show _⁻¹=(1:G), by rw [_root_.one_pow, one_inv]
@[simp] theorem gsmul_zero : ∀ (n : ℤ), n •ℤ (0 : A) = 0 :=
@one_gpow (multiplicative A) _
@[simp] theorem gpow_neg (a : G) : ∀ (n : ℤ), a ^ -n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| 0 := one_inv.symm
| -[1+ n] := (inv_inv _).symm
lemma mul_gpow_neg_one (a b : G) : (a*b)^(-(1:ℤ)) = b^(-(1:ℤ))*a^(-(1:ℤ)) :=
by simp only [mul_inv_rev, gpow_one, gpow_neg]
@[simp] theorem neg_gsmul : ∀ (a : A) (n : ℤ), -n •ℤ a = -(n •ℤ a) :=
@gpow_neg (multiplicative A) _
theorem gpow_neg_one (x : G) : x ^ (-1:ℤ) = x⁻¹ := congr_arg has_inv.inv $ pow_one x
theorem neg_one_gsmul (x : A) : (-1:ℤ) •ℤ x = -x := congr_arg has_neg.neg $ one_nsmul x
theorem gsmul_one [has_one A] (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ (1 : A) = n :=
by cases n; simp
theorem inv_gpow (a : G) : ∀n:ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) := inv_pow a n
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg has_inv.inv $ inv_pow a (n+1)
theorem gsmul_neg (a : A) (n : ℤ) : gsmul n (- a) = - gsmul n a :=
@inv_gpow (multiplicative A) _ a n
lemma gpow_add_one (a : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (n + 1) = a ^ n * a
| (of_nat n) := by simp [← int.coe_nat_succ, pow_succ']
| -[1+0] := by simp [int.neg_succ_of_nat_eq]
| -[1+(n+1)] := by rw [int.neg_succ_of_nat_eq, gpow_neg, neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right, gpow_neg,
← int.coe_nat_succ, gpow_coe_nat, gpow_coe_nat, _root_.pow_succ _ (n + 1), mul_inv_rev,
inv_mul_cancel_right]
theorem add_one_gsmul : ∀ (a : A) (i : ℤ), (i + 1) •ℤ a = i •ℤ a + a :=
@gpow_add_one (multiplicative A) _
lemma gpow_sub_one (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n * a⁻¹ :=
calc a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ (n - 1) * a * a⁻¹ : (mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
... = a^n * a⁻¹ : by rw [← gpow_add_one, sub_add_cancel]
lemma gpow_add (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m + n) = a ^ m * a ^ n :=
begin
induction n using int.induction_on with n ihn n ihn,
case hz : { simp },
{ simp only [← add_assoc, gpow_add_one, ihn, mul_assoc] },
{ rw [gpow_sub_one, ← mul_assoc, ← ihn, ← gpow_sub_one, add_sub_assoc] }
end
lemma mul_self_gpow (b : G) (m : ℤ) : b*b^m = b^(m+1) :=
by { conv_lhs {congr, rw ← gpow_one b }, rw [← gpow_add, add_comm] }
lemma mul_gpow_self (b : G) (m : ℤ) : b^m*b = b^(m+1) :=
by { conv_lhs {congr, skip, rw ← gpow_one b }, rw [← gpow_add, add_comm] }
theorem add_gsmul : ∀ (a : A) (i j : ℤ), (i + j) •ℤ a = i •ℤ a + j •ℤ a :=
@gpow_add (multiplicative A) _
lemma gpow_sub (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n)⁻¹ :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, gpow_add, gpow_neg]
lemma sub_gsmul (m n : ℤ) (a : A) : (m - n) •ℤ a = m •ℤ a - n •ℤ a :=
@gpow_sub (multiplicative A) _ _ _ _
theorem gpow_one_add (a : G) (i : ℤ) : a ^ (1 + i) = a * a ^ i :=
by rw [gpow_add, gpow_one]
theorem one_add_gsmul : ∀ (a : A) (i : ℤ), (1 + i) •ℤ a = a + i •ℤ a :=
@gpow_one_add (multiplicative A) _
theorem gpow_mul_comm (a : G) (i j : ℤ) : a ^ i * a ^ j = a ^ j * a ^ i :=
by rw [← gpow_add, ← gpow_add, add_comm]
theorem gsmul_add_comm : ∀ (a : A) (i j), i •ℤ a + j •ℤ a = j •ℤ a + i •ℤ a :=
@gpow_mul_comm (multiplicative A) _
theorem gpow_mul (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n :=
int.induction_on n (by simp) (λ n ihn, by simp [mul_add, gpow_add, ihn])
(λ n ihn, by simp only [mul_sub, gpow_sub, ihn, mul_one, gpow_one])
theorem gsmul_mul' : ∀ (a : A) (m n : ℤ), m * n •ℤ a = n •ℤ (m •ℤ a) :=
@gpow_mul (multiplicative A) _
theorem gpow_mul' (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m :=
by rw [mul_comm, gpow_mul]
theorem gsmul_mul (a : A) (m n : ℤ) : m * n •ℤ a = m •ℤ (n •ℤ a) :=
by rw [mul_comm, gsmul_mul']
theorem gpow_bit0 (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ bit0 n = a ^ n * a ^ n := gpow_add _ _ _
theorem bit0_gsmul (a : A) (n : ℤ) : bit0 n •ℤ a = n •ℤ a + n •ℤ a := gpow_add _ _ _
theorem gpow_bit1 (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ bit1 n = a ^ n * a ^ n * a :=
by rw [bit1, gpow_add]; simp [gpow_bit0]
theorem bit1_gsmul : ∀ (a : A) (n : ℤ), bit1 n •ℤ a = n •ℤ a + n •ℤ a + a :=
@gpow_bit1 (multiplicative A) _
theorem monoid_hom.map_gpow (f : G →* H) (a : G) (n : ℤ) : f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n :=
by cases n; [exact f.map_pow _ _, exact (f.map_inv _).trans (congr_arg _ $ f.map_pow _ _)]
theorem add_monoid_hom.map_gsmul (f : A →+ B) (a : A) (n : ℤ) : f (n •ℤ a) = n •ℤ f a :=
f.to_multiplicative.map_gpow a n
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma units.coe_gpow (u : units G) (n : ℤ) : ((u ^ n : units G) : G) = u ^ n :=
(units.coe_hom G).map_gpow u n
theorem commute.mul_gpow {a b : G} (h : commute a b) : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) := h.mul_pow n
| -[1+n] := by simp [h.mul_pow, (h.pow_pow n.succ n.succ).inv_inv.symm.eq]
end group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group G] [add_comm_group A]
theorem mul_gpow (a b : G) (n : ℤ) : (a * b)^n = a^n * b^n := (commute.all a b).mul_gpow n
theorem gsmul_add : ∀ (a b : A) (n : ℤ), n •ℤ (a + b) = n •ℤ a + n •ℤ b :=
@mul_gpow (multiplicative A) _
theorem gsmul_sub (a b : A) (n : ℤ) : gsmul n (a - b) = gsmul n a - gsmul n b :=
by simp only [gsmul_add, gsmul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
instance gpow.is_group_hom (n : ℤ) : is_group_hom ((^ n) : G → G) :=
{ map_mul := λ _ _, mul_gpow _ _ n }
instance gsmul.is_add_group_hom (n : ℤ) : is_add_group_hom (gsmul n : A → A) :=
{ map_add := λ _ _, gsmul_add _ _ n }
end comm_group
@[simp] lemma with_bot.coe_nsmul [add_monoid A] (a : A) (n : ℕ) :
((nsmul n a : A) : with_bot A) = nsmul n a :=
add_monoid_hom.map_nsmul ⟨(coe : A → with_bot A), with_bot.coe_zero, with_bot.coe_add⟩ a n
theorem nsmul_eq_mul' [semiring R] (a : R) (n : ℕ) : n •ℕ a = a * n :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw [zero_nsmul, nat.cast_zero, mul_zero],
rw [succ_nsmul', ih, nat.cast_succ, mul_add, mul_one]]
@[simp] theorem nsmul_eq_mul [semiring R] (n : ℕ) (a : R) : n •ℕ a = n * a :=
by rw [nsmul_eq_mul', (n.cast_commute a).eq]
theorem mul_nsmul_left [semiring R] (a b : R) (n : ℕ) : n •ℕ (a * b) = a * (n •ℕ b) :=
by rw [nsmul_eq_mul', nsmul_eq_mul', mul_assoc]
theorem mul_nsmul_assoc [semiring R] (a b : R) (n : ℕ) : n •ℕ (a * b) = n •ℕ a * b :=
by rw [nsmul_eq_mul, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
lemma zero_pow [monoid_with_zero R] : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → (0 : R) ^ n = 0
| (n+1) _ := zero_mul _
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat.cast_pow [semiring R] (n m : ℕ) : (↑(n ^ m) : R) = ↑n ^ m :=
by induction m with m ih; [exact nat.cast_one, rw [nat.pow_succ, pow_succ', nat.cast_mul, ih]]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem int.coe_nat_pow (n m : ℕ) : ((n ^ m : ℕ) : ℤ) = n ^ m :=
by induction m with m ih; [exact int.coe_nat_one, rw [nat.pow_succ, pow_succ', int.coe_nat_mul, ih]]
theorem int.nat_abs_pow (n : ℤ) (k : ℕ) : int.nat_abs (n ^ k) = (int.nat_abs n) ^ k :=
by induction k with k ih; [refl, rw [pow_succ', int.nat_abs_mul, nat.pow_succ, ih]]
namespace ring_hom
variables [semiring R] [semiring S]
@[simp] lemma map_pow (f : R →+* S) (a) :
∀ n : ℕ, f (a ^ n) = (f a) ^ n :=
f.to_monoid_hom.map_pow a
end ring_hom
theorem neg_one_pow_eq_or [ring R] : ∀ n : ℕ, (-1 : R)^n = 1 ∨ (-1 : R)^n = -1
| 0 := or.inl rfl
| (n+1) := (neg_one_pow_eq_or n).swap.imp
(λ h, by rw [pow_succ, h, neg_one_mul, neg_neg])
(λ h, by rw [pow_succ, h, mul_one])
lemma pow_dvd_pow [monoid R] (a : R) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
a ^ m ∣ a ^ n := ⟨a ^ (n - m), by rw [← pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h]⟩
theorem pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd [comm_monoid R] {a b : R} (h : a ∣ b) : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b ^ n
| 0 := dvd_refl _
| (n+1) := mul_dvd_mul h (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd n)
lemma pow_two_sub_pow_two {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (a b : R) :
a ^ 2 - b ^ 2 = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
by simp only [pow_two, mul_sub, add_mul, sub_sub, add_sub, mul_comm, sub_add_cancel]
lemma eq_or_eq_neg_of_pow_two_eq_pow_two [integral_domain R] (a b : R) (h : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2) :
a = b ∨ a = -b :=
by rwa [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← sub_eq_zero, or_comm, ← mul_eq_zero,
← pow_two_sub_pow_two a b, sub_eq_zero]
-- The next four lemmas allow us to replace multiplication by a numeral with a `gsmul` expression.
-- They are used by the `noncomm_ring` tactic, to normalise expressions before passing to `abel`.
lemma bit0_mul [ring R] {n r : R} : bit0 n * r = gsmul 2 (n * r) :=
by { dsimp [bit0], rw [add_mul, add_gsmul, one_gsmul], }
lemma mul_bit0 [ring R] {n r : R} : r * bit0 n = gsmul 2 (r * n) :=
by { dsimp [bit0], rw [mul_add, add_gsmul, one_gsmul], }
lemma bit1_mul [ring R] {n r : R} : bit1 n * r = gsmul 2 (n * r) + r :=
by { dsimp [bit1], rw [add_mul, bit0_mul, one_mul], }
lemma mul_bit1 [ring R] {n r : R} : r * bit1 n = gsmul 2 (r * n) + r :=
by { dsimp [bit1], rw [mul_add, mul_bit0, mul_one], }
@[simp] theorem gsmul_eq_mul [ring R] (a : R) : ∀ n, n •ℤ a = n * a
| (n : ℕ) := nsmul_eq_mul _ _
| -[1+ n] := show -(_ •ℕ _)=-_*_, by rw [neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, nsmul_eq_mul, nat.cast_succ]
theorem gsmul_eq_mul' [ring R] (a : R) (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ a = a * n :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_mul, (n.cast_commute a).eq]
theorem mul_gsmul_left [ring R] (a b : R) (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ (a * b) = a * (n •ℤ b) :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_mul', gsmul_eq_mul', mul_assoc]
theorem mul_gsmul_assoc [ring R] (a b : R) (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ (a * b) = n •ℤ a * b :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_mul, gsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma gsmul_int_int (a b : ℤ) : a •ℤ b = a * b := by simp [gsmul_eq_mul]
lemma gsmul_int_one (n : ℤ) : n •ℤ 1 = n := by simp
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem int.cast_pow [ring R] (n : ℤ) (m : ℕ) : (↑(n ^ m) : R) = ↑n ^ m :=
by induction m with m ih; [exact int.cast_one,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, int.cast_mul, ih]]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two [ring R] {n : ℕ} : (-1 : R) ^ n = (-1) ^ (n % 2) :=
by rw [← nat.mod_add_div n 2, pow_add, pow_mul]; simp [pow_two]
theorem sq_sub_sq [comm_ring R] (a b : R) : a ^ 2 - b ^ 2 = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
by rw [pow_two, pow_two, mul_self_sub_mul_self]
theorem pow_eq_zero [monoid_with_zero R] [no_zero_divisors R] {x : R} {n : ℕ} (H : x^n = 0) : x = 0 :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ rw pow_zero at H,
rw [← mul_one x, H, mul_zero] },
exact or.cases_on (mul_eq_zero.1 H) id ih
end
@[field_simps] theorem pow_ne_zero [monoid_with_zero R] [no_zero_divisors R]
{a : R} (n : ℕ) (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 :=
mt pow_eq_zero h
theorem nsmul_nonneg [ordered_add_comm_monoid R] {a : R} (H : 0 ≤ a) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ n •ℕ a
| 0 := le_refl _
| (n+1) := add_nonneg H (nsmul_nonneg n)
lemma pow_abs [decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring R] (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (abs a)^n = abs (a^n) :=
by induction n with n ih; [exact (abs_one).symm,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ih, abs_mul]]
lemma abs_neg_one_pow [decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring R] (n : ℕ) : abs ((-1 : R)^n) = 1 :=
by rw [←pow_abs, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
section add_monoid
variable [ordered_add_comm_monoid A]
theorem nsmul_le_nsmul {a : A} {n m : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : n •ℕ a ≤ m •ℕ a :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.le.dest h in
calc n •ℕ a = n •ℕ a + 0 : (add_zero _).symm
... ≤ n •ℕ a + k •ℕ a : add_le_add_left (nsmul_nonneg ha _) _
... = m •ℕ a : by rw [← hk, add_nsmul]
lemma nsmul_le_nsmul_of_le_right {a b : A} (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, i •ℕ a ≤ i •ℕ b
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := add_le_add hab (nsmul_le_nsmul_of_le_right _)
end add_monoid
namespace canonically_ordered_semiring
variable [canonically_ordered_comm_semiring R]
theorem pow_pos {a : R} (H : 0 < a) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < a ^ n
| 0 := canonically_ordered_semiring.zero_lt_one
| (n+1) := canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_pos.2 ⟨H, pow_pos n⟩
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_left {a b : R} (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, a^i ≤ b^i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul hab (pow_le_pow_of_le_left k)
theorem one_le_pow_of_one_le {a : R} (H : 1 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : 1 ≤ a ^ n :=
by simpa only [one_pow] using pow_le_pow_of_le_left H n
theorem pow_le_one {a : R} (H : a ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n ≤ 1:=
by simpa only [one_pow] using pow_le_pow_of_le_left H n
end canonically_ordered_semiring
section linear_ordered_semiring
variable [linear_ordered_semiring R]
theorem pow_pos {a : R} (H : 0 < a) : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < a ^ n
| 0 := zero_lt_one
| (n+1) := mul_pos H (pow_pos _)
theorem pow_nonneg {a : R} (H : 0 ≤ a) : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 := zero_le_one
| (n+1) := mul_nonneg H (pow_nonneg _)
theorem pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left {x y : R} {n : ℕ} (Hxy : x < y) (Hxpos : 0 ≤ x) (Hnpos : 0 < n) :
x ^ n < y ^ n :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le Hxpos,
{ rw ←nat.sub_add_cancel Hnpos,
induction (n - 1), { simpa only [pow_one] },
rw [pow_add, pow_add, nat.succ_eq_add_one, pow_one, pow_one],
apply mul_lt_mul ih (le_of_lt Hxy) h (le_of_lt (pow_pos (lt_trans h Hxy) _)) },
{ rw [←h, zero_pow Hnpos], apply pow_pos (by rwa ←h at Hxy : 0 < y),}
end
theorem pow_left_inj {x y : R} {n : ℕ} (Hxpos : 0 ≤ x) (Hypos : 0 ≤ y) (Hnpos : 0 < n)
(Hxyn : x ^ n = y ^ n) : x = y :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy x y with hxy | rfl | hyx,
{ exact absurd Hxyn (ne_of_lt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left hxy Hxpos Hnpos)) },
{ refl },
{ exact absurd Hxyn (ne_of_gt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left hyx Hypos Hnpos)) },
end
theorem one_le_pow_of_one_le {a : R} (H : 1 ≤ a) : ∀ (n : ℕ), 1 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 := le_refl _
| (n+1) := by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul H (one_le_pow_of_one_le n)
zero_le_one (le_trans zero_le_one H)
/-- Bernoulli's inequality. This version works for semirings but requires
an additional hypothesis `0 ≤ a * a`. -/
theorem one_add_mul_le_pow' {a : R} (Hsqr : 0 ≤ a * a) (H : 0 ≤ 1 + a) :
∀ (n : ℕ), 1 + n •ℕ a ≤ (1 + a) ^ n
| 0 := le_of_eq $ add_zero _
| (n+1) :=
calc 1 + (n + 1) •ℕ a ≤ (1 + a) * (1 + n •ℕ a) :
by simpa [succ_nsmul, mul_add, add_mul, mul_nsmul_left, add_comm, add_left_comm]
using nsmul_nonneg Hsqr n
... ≤ (1 + a)^(n+1) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (one_add_mul_le_pow' n) H
theorem pow_le_pow {a : R} {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.le.dest h in
calc a ^ n = a ^ n * 1 : (mul_one _).symm
... ≤ a ^ n * a ^ k : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(one_le_pow_of_one_le ha _)
(pow_nonneg (le_trans zero_le_one ha) _)
... = a ^ m : by rw [←hk, pow_add]
lemma pow_lt_pow {a : R} {n m : ℕ} (h : 1 < a) (h2 : n < m) : a ^ n < a ^ m :=
begin
have h' : 1 ≤ a := le_of_lt h,
have h'' : 0 < a := lt_trans zero_lt_one h,
cases m, cases h2, rw [pow_succ, ←one_mul (a ^ n)],
exact mul_lt_mul h (pow_le_pow h' (nat.le_of_lt_succ h2)) (pow_pos h'' _) (le_of_lt h'')
end
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_left {a b : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, a^i ≤ b^i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := mul_le_mul hab (pow_le_pow_of_le_left _) (pow_nonneg ha _) (le_trans ha hab)
lemma lt_of_pow_lt_pow {a b : R} (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ^ n < b ^ n) : a < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn, not_lt_of_ge (pow_le_pow_of_le_left hb hn _) h
private lemma pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one_aux {a : R} (h : 0 < a) (ha : a < 1) (i : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, a ^ (i + k + 1) < a ^ i
| 0 :=
begin
simp only [add_zero],
rw ←one_mul (a^i), exact mul_lt_mul ha (le_refl _) (pow_pos h _) zero_le_one
end
| (k+1) :=
begin
rw ←one_mul (a^i),
apply mul_lt_mul ha _ _ zero_le_one,
{ apply le_of_lt, apply pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one_aux },
{ show 0 < a ^ (i + (k + 1) + 0), apply pow_pos h }
end
private lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_one_aux {a : R} (h : 0 ≤ a) (ha : a ≤ 1) (i : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, a ^ (i + k) ≤ a ^ i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := by rw [←add_assoc, ←one_mul (a^i)];
exact mul_le_mul ha (pow_le_pow_of_le_one_aux _) (pow_nonneg h _) zero_le_one
lemma pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one {a : R} (h : 0 < a) (ha : a < 1)
{i j : ℕ} (hij : i < j) : a ^ j < a ^ i :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hij in
by rw hk; exact pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one_aux h ha _ _
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_one {a : R} (h : 0 ≤ a) (ha : a ≤ 1)
{i j : ℕ} (hij : i ≤ j) : a ^ j ≤ a ^ i :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hij in
by rw hk; exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one_aux h ha _ _
lemma pow_le_one {x : R} : ∀ (n : ℕ) (h0 : 0 ≤ x) (h1 : x ≤ 1), x ^ n ≤ 1
| 0 h0 h1 := le_refl (1 : R)
| (n+1) h0 h1 := mul_le_one h1 (pow_nonneg h0 _) (pow_le_one n h0 h1)
end linear_ordered_semiring
theorem pow_two_nonneg [linear_ordered_ring R] (a : R) : 0 ≤ a ^ 2 :=
by { rw pow_two, exact mul_self_nonneg _ }
theorem pow_two_pos_of_ne_zero [linear_ordered_ring R] (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ 2 :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (pow_two_nonneg a) (pow_ne_zero 2 h).symm
/-- Bernoulli's inequality for `n : ℕ`, `-2 ≤ a`. -/
theorem one_add_mul_le_pow [linear_ordered_ring R] {a : R} (H : -2 ≤ a) :
∀ (n : ℕ), 1 + n •ℕ a ≤ (1 + a) ^ n
| 0 := le_of_eq $ add_zero _
| 1 := by simp
| (n+2) :=
have H' : 0 ≤ 2 + a,
from neg_le_iff_add_nonneg.1 H,
have 0 ≤ n •ℕ (a * a * (2 + a)) + a * a,
from add_nonneg (nsmul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg a) H') n)
(mul_self_nonneg a),
calc 1 + (n + 2) •ℕ a ≤ 1 + (n + 2) •ℕ a + (n •ℕ (a * a * (2 + a)) + a * a) :
(le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).2 this
... = (1 + a) * (1 + a) * (1 + n •ℕ a) :
by { simp only [add_mul, mul_add, mul_two, mul_one, one_mul, succ_nsmul, nsmul_add,
mul_nsmul_assoc, (mul_nsmul_left _ _ _).symm],
ac_refl }
... ≤ (1 + a) * (1 + a) * (1 + a)^n :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (one_add_mul_le_pow n) (mul_self_nonneg (1 + a))
... = (1 + a)^(n + 2) : by simp only [pow_succ, mul_assoc]
/-- Bernoulli's inequality reformulated to estimate `a^n`. -/
theorem one_add_sub_mul_le_pow [linear_ordered_ring R]
{a : R} (H : -1 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : 1 + n •ℕ (a - 1) ≤ a ^ n :=
have -2 ≤ a - 1, by { rw [bit0, neg_add], exact sub_le_sub_right H 1 },
by simpa only [add_sub_cancel'_right] using one_add_mul_le_pow this n
namespace int
lemma units_pow_two (u : units ℤ) : u ^ 2 = 1 :=
(units_eq_one_or u).elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl) (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl)
lemma units_pow_eq_pow_mod_two (u : units ℤ) (n : ℕ) : u ^ n = u ^ (n % 2) :=
by conv {to_lhs, rw ← nat.mod_add_div n 2}; rw [pow_add, pow_mul, units_pow_two, one_pow, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_pow_two (x : ℤ) : (x.nat_abs ^ 2 : ℤ) = x ^ 2 :=
by rw [pow_two, int.nat_abs_mul_self', pow_two]
end int
@[simp] lemma neg_square {α} [ring α] (z : α) : (-z)^2 = z^2 :=
by simp [pow, monoid.pow]
lemma of_add_nsmul [add_monoid A] (x : A) (n : ℕ) :
multiplicative.of_add (n •ℕ x) = (multiplicative.of_add x)^n := rfl
lemma of_add_gsmul [add_group A] (x : A) (n : ℤ) :
multiplicative.of_add (n •ℤ x) = (multiplicative.of_add x)^n := rfl
variables (M G A)
/-- Monoid homomorphisms from `multiplicative ℕ` are defined by the image
of `multiplicative.of_add 1`. -/
def powers_hom [monoid M] : M ≃ (multiplicative ℕ →* M) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨λ n, x ^ n.to_add, pow_zero x, λ m n, pow_add x m n⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, f (multiplicative.of_add 1),
left_inv := pow_one,
right_inv := λ f, monoid_hom.ext $ λ n, by { simp [← f.map_pow, ← of_add_nsmul] } }
/-- Monoid homomorphisms from `multiplicative ℤ` are defined by the image
of `multiplicative.of_add 1`. -/
def gpowers_hom [group G] : G ≃ (multiplicative ℤ →* G) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨λ n, x ^ n.to_add, gpow_zero x, λ m n, gpow_add x m n⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, f (multiplicative.of_add 1),
left_inv := gpow_one,
right_inv := λ f, monoid_hom.ext $ λ n, by { simp [← f.map_gpow, ← of_add_gsmul ] } }
/-- Additive homomorphisms from `ℕ` are defined by the image of `1`. -/
def multiples_hom [add_monoid A] : A ≃ (ℕ →+ A) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨λ n, n •ℕ x, zero_nsmul x, λ m n, add_nsmul _ _ _⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, f 1,
left_inv := one_nsmul,
right_inv := λ f, add_monoid_hom.ext_nat $ one_nsmul (f 1) }
/-- Additive homomorphisms from `ℤ` are defined by the image of `1`. -/
def gmultiples_hom [add_group A] : A ≃ (ℤ →+ A) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨λ n, n •ℤ x, zero_gsmul x, λ m n, add_gsmul _ _ _⟩,
inv_fun := λ f, f 1,
left_inv := one_gsmul,
right_inv := λ f, add_monoid_hom.ext_int $ one_gsmul (f 1) }
variables {M G A}
@[simp] lemma powers_hom_apply [monoid M] (x : M) (n : multiplicative ℕ) :
powers_hom M x n = x ^ n.to_add := rfl
@[simp] lemma powers_hom_symm_apply [monoid M] (f : multiplicative ℕ →* M) :
(powers_hom M).symm f = f (multiplicative.of_add 1) := rfl
lemma mnat_monoid_hom_eq [monoid M] (f : multiplicative ℕ →* M) (n : multiplicative ℕ) :
f n = (f (multiplicative.of_add 1)) ^ n.to_add :=
by rw [← powers_hom_symm_apply, ← powers_hom_apply, equiv.apply_symm_apply]
lemma mnat_monoid_hom_ext [monoid M] ⦃f g : multiplicative ℕ →* M⦄
(h : f (multiplicative.of_add 1) = g (multiplicative.of_add 1)) : f = g :=
monoid_hom.ext $ λ n, by rw [mnat_monoid_hom_eq f, mnat_monoid_hom_eq g, h]
/-!
### Commutativity (again)
Facts about `semiconj_by` and `commute` that require `gpow` or `gsmul`, or the fact that integer
multiplication equals semiring multiplication.
-/
namespace semiconj_by
section
variables [semiring R] {a x y : R}
@[simp] lemma cast_nat_mul_right (h : semiconj_by a x y) (n : ℕ) : semiconj_by a ((n : R) * x) (n * y) :=
semiconj_by.mul_right (nat.commute_cast _ _) h
@[simp] lemma cast_nat_mul_left (h : semiconj_by a x y) (n : ℕ) : semiconj_by ((n : R) * a) x y :=
semiconj_by.mul_left (nat.cast_commute _ _) h
@[simp] lemma cast_nat_mul_cast_nat_mul (h : semiconj_by a x y) (m n : ℕ) :
semiconj_by ((m : R) * a) (n * x) (n * y) :=
(h.cast_nat_mul_left m).cast_nat_mul_right n
end
variables [monoid M] [group G] [ring R]
@[simp] lemma units_gpow_right {a : M} {x y : units M} (h : semiconj_by a x y) :
∀ m : ℤ, semiconj_by a (↑(x^m)) (↑(y^m))
| (n : ℕ) := by simp only [gpow_coe_nat, units.coe_pow, h, pow_right]
| -[1+n] := by simp only [gpow_neg_succ_of_nat, units.coe_pow, units_inv_right, h, pow_right]
@[simp] lemma gpow_right {a x y : G} (h : semiconj_by a x y) : ∀ m : ℤ, semiconj_by a (x^m) (y^m)
| (n : ℕ) := h.pow_right n
| -[1+n] := (h.pow_right n.succ).inv_right
variables {a b x y x' y' : R}
@[simp] lemma cast_int_mul_right (h : semiconj_by a x y) (m : ℤ) :
semiconj_by a ((m : ℤ) * x) (m * y) :=
semiconj_by.mul_right (int.commute_cast _ _) h
@[simp] lemma cast_int_mul_left (h : semiconj_by a x y) (m : ℤ) : semiconj_by ((m : R) * a) x y :=
semiconj_by.mul_left (int.cast_commute _ _) h
@[simp] lemma cast_int_mul_cast_int_mul (h : semiconj_by a x y) (m n : ℤ) :
semiconj_by ((m : R) * a) (n * x) (n * y) :=
(h.cast_int_mul_left m).cast_int_mul_right n
end semiconj_by
namespace commute
section
variables [semiring R] {a b : R}
@[simp] theorem cast_nat_mul_right (h : commute a b) (n : ℕ) : commute a ((n : R) * b) :=
h.cast_nat_mul_right n
@[simp] theorem cast_nat_mul_left (h : commute a b) (n : ℕ) : commute ((n : R) * a) b :=
h.cast_nat_mul_left n
@[simp] theorem cast_nat_mul_cast_nat_mul (h : commute a b) (m n : ℕ) :
commute ((m : R) * a) (n * b) :=
h.cast_nat_mul_cast_nat_mul m n
@[simp] theorem self_cast_nat_mul (n : ℕ) : commute a (n * a) :=
(commute.refl a).cast_nat_mul_right n
@[simp] theorem cast_nat_mul_self (n : ℕ) : commute ((n : R) * a) a :=
(commute.refl a).cast_nat_mul_left n
@[simp] theorem self_cast_nat_mul_cast_nat_mul (m n : ℕ) : commute ((m : R) * a) (n * a) :=
(commute.refl a).cast_nat_mul_cast_nat_mul m n
end
variables [monoid M] [group G] [ring R]
@[simp] lemma units_gpow_right {a : M} {u : units M} (h : commute a u) (m : ℤ) :
commute a (↑(u^m)) :=
h.units_gpow_right m
@[simp] lemma units_gpow_left {u : units M} {a : M} (h : commute ↑u a) (m : ℤ) :
commute (↑(u^m)) a :=
(h.symm.units_gpow_right m).symm
section
variables {a b : G}
@[simp] lemma gpow_right (h : commute a b) (m : ℤ) : commute a (b^m) :=
h.gpow_right m
@[simp] lemma gpow_left (h : commute a b) (m : ℤ) : commute (a^m) b :=
(h.symm.gpow_right m).symm
lemma gpow_gpow (h : commute a b) (m n : ℤ) : commute (a^m) (b^n) := (h.gpow_left m).gpow_right n
variables (a) (m n : ℕ)
@[simp] theorem self_gpow : commute a (a ^ n) := (commute.refl a).gpow_right n
@[simp] theorem gpow_self : commute (a ^ n) a := (commute.refl a).gpow_left n
@[simp] theorem gpow_gpow_self : commute (a ^ m) (a ^ n) := (commute.refl a).gpow_gpow m n
end
variables {a b : R}
@[simp] lemma cast_int_mul_right (h : commute a b) (m : ℤ) : commute a (m * b) :=
h.cast_int_mul_right m
@[simp] lemma cast_int_mul_left (h : commute a b) (m : ℤ) : commute ((m : R) * a) b :=
h.cast_int_mul_left m
lemma cast_int_mul_cast_int_mul (h : commute a b) (m n : ℤ) : commute ((m : R) * a) (n * b) :=
h.cast_int_mul_cast_int_mul m n
variables (a) (m n : ℤ)
@[simp] theorem self_cast_int_mul : commute a (n * a) := (commute.refl a).cast_int_mul_right n
@[simp] theorem cast_int_mul_self : commute ((n : R) * a) a := (commute.refl a).cast_int_mul_left n
theorem self_cast_int_mul_cast_int_mul : commute ((m : R) * a) (n * a) :=
(commute.refl a).cast_int_mul_cast_int_mul m n
end commute
section multiplicative
open multiplicative
@[simp] lemma nat.to_add_pow (a : multiplicative ℕ) (b : ℕ) : to_add (a ^ b) = to_add a * b :=
begin
induction b with b ih,
{ erw [pow_zero, to_add_one, mul_zero] },
{ simp [*, pow_succ, add_comm, nat.mul_succ] }
end
@[simp] lemma nat.of_add_mul (a b : ℕ) : of_add (a * b) = of_add a ^ b :=
(nat.to_add_pow _ _).symm
@[simp] lemma int.to_add_pow (a : multiplicative ℤ) (b : ℕ) : to_add (a ^ b) = to_add a * b :=
by induction b; simp [*, mul_add, pow_succ, add_comm]
@[simp] lemma int.to_add_gpow (a : multiplicative ℤ) (b : ℤ) : to_add (a ^ b) = to_add a * b :=
int.induction_on b (by simp)
(by simp [gpow_add, mul_add] {contextual := tt})
(by simp [gpow_add, mul_add, sub_eq_add_neg] {contextual := tt})
@[simp] lemma int.of_add_mul (a b : ℤ) : of_add (a * b) = of_add a ^ b :=
(int.to_add_gpow _ _).symm
end multiplicative
namespace units
variables [monoid M]
lemma conj_pow (u : units M) (x : M) (n : ℕ) : (↑u * x * ↑(u⁻¹))^n = u * x^n * ↑(u⁻¹) :=
(divp_eq_iff_mul_eq.2 ((u.mk_semiconj_by x).pow_right n).eq.symm).symm
lemma conj_pow' (u : units M) (x : M) (n : ℕ) : (↑(u⁻¹) * x * u)^n = ↑(u⁻¹) * x^n * u:=
(u⁻¹).conj_pow x n
open opposite
/-- Moving to the opposite monoid commutes with taking powers. -/
@[simp] lemma op_pow (x : M) (n : ℕ) : op (x ^ n) = (op x) ^ n :=
begin
induction n with n h,
{ simp },
{ rw [pow_succ', op_mul, h, pow_succ] }
end
@[simp] lemma unop_pow (x : Mᵒᵖ) (n : ℕ) : unop (x ^ n) = (unop x) ^ n :=
begin
induction n with n h,
{ simp },
{ rw [pow_succ', unop_mul, h, pow_succ] }
end
end units
|
2be731b34fe28e0fa78092dbfc785ad68457b552 | 3b1abba731363bfec018d9d2cfee7fd90e1dc93c | /RT_n_m.lean | bfe8c4055f59646a065f9ebb1bee1f85a1e7e0e8 | [] | no_license | minchaowu/Ramsey.lean | dcf4e0845cca6dc02ef898f3fd9123c079c5a1a9 | 8ebbead4869bdf3f4788137411c5f36f2e72943a | refs/heads/master | 1,610,462,544,433 | 1,488,596,497,000 | 1,488,596,497,000 | 72,063,527 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,959 | lean | import definitions lemmas_for_RT_n_m RT_1_2 RT_n_2
open classical set nat decidable
noncomputable theory
theorem RT_n_m (n m : ℕ) : ∀ X : set ℕ, ∀ c : set ℕ → ℕ, infinite X → is_coloring X (n+1) (m+2) c → ∃ S, S ⊆ X ∧ infinite S ∧ is_homogeneous X c (n+1) (m+2) S :=
nat.induction_on m
(take X, take c, assume H1, assume H2,
show ∃ S, S ⊆ X ∧ infinite S ∧ is_homogeneous X c (n+1) (0+2) S, from RT_n_2 n X c H1 H2)
(take m, assume IH,
take X, take c, assume Hinf, assume Hic,
let c' (s : set ℕ) : ℕ := if c s = (m+(2:ℕ)) then (1:ℕ) else 0 in
have is_coloring X (n+1) 2 c', from
take a, assume Ha,
by_cases
(suppose Hca : c a = m+2,
have Hcca : c' a = (1:ℕ),from if_pos Hca,
by_contradiction
(assume Hn : ¬ c' a < 2,
have H12 : 1 < (2:ℕ), from dec_trivial,
have ¬ 1 < (2:ℕ), by+ rewrite Hcca at Hn;exact Hn,
this H12))
(suppose Hnca : c a ≠ m+2,
have Hcca : c' a = (0:ℕ),from if_neg Hnca,
by_contradiction
(assume Hn : ¬ c' a < 2,
have H02 : 0 < (2:ℕ), from dec_trivial,
have ¬ 0 < (2:ℕ), by+ rewrite Hcca at Hn;exact Hn,
this H02)),
have ∃ S, S ⊆ X ∧ infinite S ∧ is_homogeneous X c' (n+1) 2 S, from RT_n_2 _ _ _ Hinf this,
obtain (H : set ℕ) (Hp : H ⊆ X ∧ infinite H ∧ is_homogeneous X c' (n+1) 2 H), from this,
have Hsub : H ⊆ X, from and.left Hp,
have HinfH : infinite H, from and.left (and.right Hp),
--show ∃ H, H ⊆ X ∧ infinite H ∧ is_homogeneous X c (n+1) (m+3) H, from
by_cases
(suppose Ha : ∀₀ a ∈ tuples H (n+1), c' a = 1,
have Hp1 : H ⊆ X, from and.left Hp,
have ∀₀ a ∈ tuples H (n+1), ∀₀ b ∈ tuples H (n+1), c a = c b, from
take a, assume Hta, take b, assume Htb,
have Hc'a : c' a = 1, from Ha Hta,
have (1:ℕ) ≠ 0, from dec_trivial,
have Hcaneq0 : c' a ≠ 0, by+ rewrite -Hc'a at this;exact this,
have Hca : c a = m+2, from
by_contradiction
(assume Hc : c a ≠ m+2,
have c' a = 0, from if_neg Hc,
Hcaneq0 this),
have Hc'b : c' b = 1, from Ha Htb,
have (1:ℕ) ≠ 0, from dec_trivial,
have Hcbneq0 : c' b ≠ 0, by+ rewrite -Hc'b at this;exact this,
have Hcb : c b = m+2, from
by_contradiction
(assume Hc : c b ≠ m+2,
have c' b = 0, from if_neg Hc,
Hcbneq0 this),
begin+ rewrite -Hcb at Hca, exact Hca end,
have is_homogeneous X c (n+1) (m+3) H, from and.intro Hic (and.intro Hp1 this),
have H ⊆ X ∧ infinite H ∧ is_homogeneous X c (n+1) (m+3) H, from and.intro Hsub (and.intro HinfH this),
exists.intro H this)
(suppose ¬∀₀ a ∈ tuples H (n+1), c' a = 1,
have ∃₀ a ∈ tuples H (n+1), ¬ c' a = 1, by+ rewrite not_bounded_forall at this;exact this,
obtain (a : set ℕ) (Hc'a1 : a ∈ tuples H (n+1) ∧ c' a ≠ 1), from this,
have Hc'aneq1 : c' a ≠ 1, from and.right Hc'a1,
have c a ≠ m+2, from
by_contradiction
(suppose ¬ c a ≠ m+2,
have c a = m+2, from dne this,
have c' a = 1, from if_pos this,
Hc'aneq1 this),
have Hc'aeq0 : c' a = 0, from if_neg this,
have Hall0 : ∀₀ a ∈ tuples H (n+1), c' a = 0, from
take b, assume Hbt,
have is_homogeneous X c' (n+1) 2 H, from and.right (and.right Hp),
have ∀₀ a ∈ tuples H (n+1), ∀₀ b ∈ tuples H (n+1), c' a = c' b, from and.right (and.right this),
have c' a = c' b, from this (and.left Hc'a1) Hbt,
by+ rewrite this at Hc'aeq0;exact Hc'aeq0,
have is_coloring H (n+1) (m+2) c, from
take d, assume Hdt,
have Hcdneq : c d ≠ m+2, from
by_contradiction
(suppose ¬ c d ≠ m+2,
have c d = m+2, from dne this,
have Hc'deq1 : c' d = 1, from if_pos this,
have Hc'd0 : c' d = 0, from Hall0 Hdt,
have (0:ℕ) ≠ 1, from dec_trivial,
have c' d ≠ 1, by+ rewrite -Hc'd0 at this;exact this,
this Hc'deq1),
have d ∈ tuples X (n+1), from sub_tuples H X (and.left Hp) (n+1) Hdt,
have c d < m+3, from Hic this,
have c d ≤ m+2, from le_of_lt_succ this,
have c d < m+2 ∨ c d = m+2, from lt_or_eq_of_le this,
or_resolve_left this Hcdneq,
have ∃ S, S ⊆ H ∧ infinite S ∧ is_homogeneous H c (n+1) (m+2) S, from IH H c HinfH this,
obtain (S : set ℕ) (HS : S ⊆ H ∧ infinite S ∧ is_homogeneous H c (n+1) (m+2) S), from this,
have HsubS : S ⊆ X, from subset.trans (and.left HS) Hsub,
have HinfS : infinite S, from and.left (and.right HS),
have is_homogeneous H c (n+1) (m+2) S, from and.right (and.right HS),
have ∀₀ a ∈ tuples S (n+1), ∀₀ b ∈ tuples S (n+1), c a = c b, from and.right (and.right this),
have is_homogeneous X c (n+1) (m+3) S, from and.intro Hic (and.intro HsubS this),
have S ⊆ X ∧ infinite S ∧ is_homogeneous X c (n+1) (m+3) S, from and.intro HsubS (and.intro HinfS this),
exists.intro S this))
check RT_n_m
|
e3233bba1cc6ce22d324dba016f141ea8e89043c | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/topology/homeomorph.lean | 64328f6ebcc5a2bebc04b04cb1c08487ca2c11a7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,608 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel, Zhouhang Zhou, Reid Barton
-/
import topology.dense_embedding
open set filter
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
/-- Homeomorphism between `α` and `β`, also called topological isomorphism -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance] -- not all spaces are homeomorphic to each other
structure homeomorph (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
extends α ≃ β :=
(continuous_to_fun : continuous to_fun . tactic.interactive.continuity')
(continuous_inv_fun : continuous inv_fun . tactic.interactive.continuity')
infix ` ≃ₜ `:25 := homeomorph
namespace homeomorph
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ] [topological_space δ]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (α ≃ₜ β) := ⟨λ_, α → β, λe, e.to_equiv⟩
@[simp] lemma homeomorph_mk_coe (a : equiv α β) (b c) :
((homeomorph.mk a b c) : α → β) = a :=
rfl
lemma coe_eq_to_equiv (h : α ≃ₜ β) (a : α) : h a = h.to_equiv a := rfl
lemma to_equiv_injective : function.injective (to_equiv : α ≃ₜ β → α ≃ β)
| ⟨e, h₁, h₂⟩ ⟨e', h₁', h₂'⟩ rfl := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {h h' : α ≃ₜ β} (H : ∀ x, h x = h' x) : h = h' :=
to_equiv_injective $ equiv.ext H
/-- Identity map as a homeomorphism. -/
protected def refl (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : α ≃ₜ α :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_id,
to_equiv := equiv.refl α }
@[simp] lemma coe_refl : ⇑(homeomorph.refl α) = id := rfl
/-- Composition of two homeomorphisms. -/
protected def trans (h₁ : α ≃ₜ β) (h₂ : β ≃ₜ γ) : α ≃ₜ γ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := h₂.continuous_to_fun.comp h₁.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := h₁.continuous_inv_fun.comp h₂.continuous_inv_fun,
to_equiv := equiv.trans h₁.to_equiv h₂.to_equiv }
/-- Inverse of a homeomorphism. -/
protected def symm (h : α ≃ₜ β) : β ≃ₜ α :=
{ continuous_to_fun := h.continuous_inv_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := h.continuous_to_fun,
to_equiv := h.to_equiv.symm }
@[simp] lemma homeomorph_mk_coe_symm (a : equiv α β) (b c) :
((homeomorph.mk a b c).symm : β → α) = a.symm :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_symm : (homeomorph.refl α).symm = homeomorph.refl α := rfl
@[continuity]
protected lemma continuous (h : α ≃ₜ β) : continuous h := h.continuous_to_fun
@[simp] lemma apply_symm_apply (h : α ≃ₜ β) (x : β) : h (h.symm x) = x :=
h.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply x
@[simp] lemma symm_apply_apply (h : α ≃ₜ β) (x : α) : h.symm (h x) = x :=
h.to_equiv.symm_apply_apply x
protected lemma bijective (h : α ≃ₜ β) : function.bijective h := h.to_equiv.bijective
protected lemma injective (h : α ≃ₜ β) : function.injective h := h.to_equiv.injective
protected lemma surjective (h : α ≃ₜ β) : function.surjective h := h.to_equiv.surjective
/-- Change the homeomorphism `f` to make the inverse function definitionally equal to `g`. -/
def change_inv (f : α ≃ₜ β) (g : β → α) (hg : function.right_inverse g f) : α ≃ₜ β :=
have g = f.symm, from funext (λ x, calc g x = f.symm (f (g x)) : (f.left_inv (g x)).symm
... = f.symm x : by rw hg x),
{ to_fun := f,
inv_fun := g,
left_inv := by convert f.left_inv,
right_inv := by convert f.right_inv,
continuous_to_fun := f.continuous,
continuous_inv_fun := by convert f.symm.continuous }
@[simp] lemma symm_comp_self (h : α ≃ₜ β) : ⇑h.symm ∘ ⇑h = id :=
funext h.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] lemma self_comp_symm (h : α ≃ₜ β) : ⇑h ∘ ⇑h.symm = id :=
funext h.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma range_coe (h : α ≃ₜ β) : range h = univ :=
h.surjective.range_eq
lemma image_symm (h : α ≃ₜ β) : image h.symm = preimage h :=
funext h.symm.to_equiv.image_eq_preimage
lemma preimage_symm (h : α ≃ₜ β) : preimage h.symm = image h :=
(funext h.to_equiv.image_eq_preimage).symm
@[simp] lemma image_preimage (h : α ≃ₜ β) (s : set β) : h '' (h ⁻¹' s) = s :=
h.to_equiv.image_preimage s
@[simp] lemma preimage_image (h : α ≃ₜ β) (s : set α) : h ⁻¹' (h '' s) = s :=
h.to_equiv.preimage_image s
protected lemma inducing (h : α ≃ₜ β) : inducing h :=
inducing_of_inducing_compose h.continuous h.symm.continuous $
by simp only [symm_comp_self, inducing_id]
lemma induced_eq (h : α ≃ₜ β) : topological_space.induced h ‹_› = ‹_› := h.inducing.1.symm
protected lemma quotient_map (h : α ≃ₜ β) : quotient_map h :=
quotient_map.of_quotient_map_compose h.symm.continuous h.continuous $
by simp only [self_comp_symm, quotient_map.id]
lemma coinduced_eq (h : α ≃ₜ β) : topological_space.coinduced h ‹_› = ‹_› :=
h.quotient_map.2.symm
protected lemma embedding (h : α ≃ₜ β) : embedding h :=
⟨h.inducing, h.to_equiv.injective⟩
lemma compact_image {s : set α} (h : α ≃ₜ β) : is_compact (h '' s) ↔ is_compact s :=
h.embedding.compact_iff_compact_image.symm
lemma compact_preimage {s : set β} (h : α ≃ₜ β) : is_compact (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ is_compact s :=
by rw ← image_symm; exact h.symm.compact_image
protected lemma dense_embedding (h : α ≃ₜ β) : dense_embedding h :=
{ dense := h.surjective.dense_range,
inj := h.injective,
induced := h.induced_eq.symm }
@[simp] lemma is_open_preimage (h : α ≃ₜ β) {s : set β} : is_open (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ is_open s :=
h.quotient_map.is_open_preimage
@[simp] lemma is_open_image (h : α ≃ₜ β) {s : set α} : is_open (h '' s) ↔ is_open s :=
by rw [← preimage_symm, is_open_preimage]
@[simp] lemma is_closed_preimage (h : α ≃ₜ β) {s : set β} : is_closed (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ is_closed s :=
by simp only [is_closed, ← preimage_compl, is_open_preimage]
@[simp] lemma is_closed_image (h : α ≃ₜ β) {s : set α} : is_closed (h '' s) ↔ is_closed s :=
by rw [← preimage_symm, is_closed_preimage]
lemma preimage_closure (h : α ≃ₜ β) (s : set β) : h ⁻¹' (closure s) = closure (h ⁻¹' s) :=
by rw [h.embedding.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, h.image_preimage]
lemma image_closure (h : α ≃ₜ β) (s : set α) : h '' (closure s) = closure (h '' s) :=
by rw [← preimage_symm, preimage_closure]
protected lemma is_open_map (h : α ≃ₜ β) : is_open_map h := λ s, h.is_open_image.2
protected lemma is_closed_map (h : α ≃ₜ β) : is_closed_map h := λ s, h.is_closed_image.2
protected lemma closed_embedding (h : α ≃ₜ β) : closed_embedding h :=
closed_embedding_of_embedding_closed h.embedding h.is_closed_map
@[simp] lemma map_nhds_eq (h : α ≃ₜ β) (x : α) : map h (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (h x) :=
h.embedding.map_nhds_of_mem _ (by simp)
lemma nhds_eq_comap (h : α ≃ₜ β) (x : α) : 𝓝 x = comap h (𝓝 (h x)) :=
h.embedding.to_inducing.nhds_eq_comap x
@[simp] lemma comap_nhds_eq (h : α ≃ₜ β) (y : β) : comap h (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (h.symm y) :=
by rw [h.nhds_eq_comap, h.apply_symm_apply]
/-- If an bijective map `e : α ≃ β` is continuous and open, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
def homeomorph_of_continuous_open (e : α ≃ β) (h₁ : continuous e) (h₂ : is_open_map e) :
α ≃ₜ β :=
{ continuous_to_fun := h₁,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
rw continuous_def,
intros s hs,
convert ← h₂ s hs using 1,
apply e.image_eq_preimage
end,
to_equiv := e }
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_on_iff (h : α ≃ₜ β) (f : γ → α) (s : set γ) :
continuous_on (h ∘ f) s ↔ continuous_on f s :=
h.inducing.continuous_on_iff.symm
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_iff (h : α ≃ₜ β) {f : γ → α} :
continuous (h ∘ f) ↔ continuous f :=
h.inducing.continuous_iff.symm
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_iff' (h : α ≃ₜ β) {f : β → γ} :
continuous (f ∘ h) ↔ continuous f :=
h.quotient_map.continuous_iff.symm
/-- If two sets are equal, then they are homeomorphic. -/
def set_congr {s t : set α} (h : s = t) : s ≃ₜ t :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_subtype_mk _ continuous_subtype_val,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_subtype_mk _ continuous_subtype_val,
to_equiv := equiv.set_congr h }
/-- Sum of two homeomorphisms. -/
def sum_congr (h₁ : α ≃ₜ β) (h₂ : γ ≃ₜ δ) : α ⊕ γ ≃ₜ β ⊕ δ :=
{ continuous_to_fun :=
begin
convert continuous_sum_rec (continuous_inl.comp h₁.continuous)
(continuous_inr.comp h₂.continuous),
ext x, cases x; refl,
end,
continuous_inv_fun :=
begin
convert continuous_sum_rec (continuous_inl.comp h₁.symm.continuous)
(continuous_inr.comp h₂.symm.continuous),
ext x, cases x; refl
end,
to_equiv := h₁.to_equiv.sum_congr h₂.to_equiv }
/-- Product of two homeomorphisms. -/
def prod_congr (h₁ : α ≃ₜ β) (h₂ : γ ≃ₜ δ) : α × γ ≃ₜ β × δ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := (h₁.continuous.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
(h₂.continuous.comp continuous_snd),
continuous_inv_fun := (h₁.symm.continuous.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
(h₂.symm.continuous.comp continuous_snd),
to_equiv := h₁.to_equiv.prod_congr h₂.to_equiv }
@[simp] lemma prod_congr_symm (h₁ : α ≃ₜ β) (h₂ : γ ≃ₜ δ) :
(h₁.prod_congr h₂).symm = h₁.symm.prod_congr h₂.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_prod_congr (h₁ : α ≃ₜ β) (h₂ : γ ≃ₜ δ) :
⇑(h₁.prod_congr h₂) = prod.map h₁ h₂ := rfl
section
variables (α β γ)
/-- `α × β` is homeomorphic to `β × α`. -/
def prod_comm : α × β ≃ₜ β × α :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_snd.prod_mk continuous_fst,
to_equiv := equiv.prod_comm α β }
@[simp] lemma prod_comm_symm : (prod_comm α β).symm = prod_comm β α := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_prod_comm : ⇑(prod_comm α β) = prod.swap := rfl
/-- `(α × β) × γ` is homeomorphic to `α × (β × γ)`. -/
def prod_assoc : (α × β) × γ ≃ₜ α × (β × γ) :=
{ continuous_to_fun := (continuous_fst.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
((continuous_snd.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd),
continuous_inv_fun := (continuous_fst.prod_mk (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd),
to_equiv := equiv.prod_assoc α β γ }
/-- `α × {*}` is homeomorphic to `α`. -/
def prod_punit : α × punit ≃ₜ α :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.prod_punit α,
continuous_to_fun := continuous_fst,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const }
@[simp] lemma coe_prod_punit : ⇑(prod_punit α) = prod.fst := rfl
/-- `{*} × α` is homeomorphic to `α`. -/
def punit_prod : punit × α ≃ₜ α :=
(prod_comm _ _).trans (prod_punit _)
@[simp] lemma coe_punit_prod : ⇑(punit_prod α) = prod.snd := rfl
end
/-- `ulift α` is homeomorphic to `α`. -/
def {u v} ulift {α : Type u} [topological_space α] : ulift.{v u} α ≃ₜ α :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_ulift_down,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_ulift_up,
to_equiv := equiv.ulift }
section distrib
/-- `(α ⊕ β) × γ` is homeomorphic to `α × γ ⊕ β × γ`. -/
def sum_prod_distrib : (α ⊕ β) × γ ≃ₜ α × γ ⊕ β × γ :=
begin
refine (homeomorph.homeomorph_of_continuous_open (equiv.sum_prod_distrib α β γ).symm _ _).symm,
{ convert continuous_sum_rec
((continuous_inl.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd)
((continuous_inr.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd),
ext1 x, cases x; refl, },
{ exact (is_open_map_sum
(open_embedding_inl.prod open_embedding_id).is_open_map
(open_embedding_inr.prod open_embedding_id).is_open_map) }
end
/-- `α × (β ⊕ γ)` is homeomorphic to `α × β ⊕ α × γ`. -/
def prod_sum_distrib : α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ₜ α × β ⊕ α × γ :=
(prod_comm _ _).trans $
sum_prod_distrib.trans $
sum_congr (prod_comm _ _) (prod_comm _ _)
variables {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} [Π i, topological_space (σ i)]
/-- `(Σ i, σ i) × β` is homeomorphic to `Σ i, (σ i × β)`. -/
def sigma_prod_distrib : ((Σ i, σ i) × β) ≃ₜ (Σ i, (σ i × β)) :=
homeomorph.symm $
homeomorph_of_continuous_open (equiv.sigma_prod_distrib σ β).symm
(continuous_sigma $ λ i,
(continuous_sigma_mk.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd)
(is_open_map_sigma $ λ i,
(open_embedding_sigma_mk.prod open_embedding_id).is_open_map)
end distrib
end homeomorph
|
e81818efaae534aa9a0ede07055efb49a35edc8a | fe84e287c662151bb313504482b218a503b972f3 | /src/data/int_lemmas.lean | d1ed1c411bd6ccd3e7a5c28281b105d297051ba6 | [] | no_license | NeilStrickland/lean_lib | 91e163f514b829c42fe75636407138b5c75cba83 | 6a9563de93748ace509d9db4302db6cd77d8f92c | refs/heads/master | 1,653,408,198,261 | 1,652,996,419,000 | 1,652,996,419,000 | 181,006,067 | 4 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,305 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
Some basic lemmas about integers. I should check whether the
new coercion tactic makes them trivial.
-/
import data.fintype.basic data.nat.sqrt
lemma int.lt_succ_iff {n m : ℤ} : n < m + 1 ↔ n ≤ m :=
⟨int.le_of_lt_add_one,int.lt_add_one_of_le⟩
lemma nat.square_le {n m : ℕ} : m ^ 2 ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
⟨λ h0, le_of_not_gt (λ h1, not_le_of_gt ((pow_two m).symm.subst (nat.sqrt_lt.mp h1)) h0),
λ h0, le_of_not_gt (λ h1,not_le_of_gt (nat.sqrt_lt.mpr ((pow_two m).subst h1)) h0)⟩
lemma nat.square_lt {n m : ℕ} : m ^ 2 < n.succ ↔ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
(@nat.lt_succ_iff (m ^ 2) n).trans (@nat.square_le n m)
lemma int.abs_le {n m : ℤ} : abs m ≤ n ↔ (- n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n) :=
begin
by_cases hm : 0 ≤ m,
{ rw[abs_of_nonneg hm],
exact ⟨
λ hmn, ⟨le_trans (neg_nonpos_of_nonneg (le_trans hm hmn)) hm,hmn⟩,
λ hmn, hmn.right
⟩
},{
let hma := le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge hm),
let hmb := neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hma,
rw[abs_of_nonpos hma],
exact ⟨
λ hmn, ⟨(neg_neg m) ▸ (neg_le_neg hmn),le_trans (le_trans hma hmb) hmn⟩,
λ hmn, (neg_neg n) ▸ (neg_le_neg hmn.left),
⟩
}
end
lemma int.abs_le' {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} : m.nat_abs ≤ n ↔ (- (n : ℤ) ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n) :=
begin
let h := @int.abs_le n m,
rw[int.abs_eq_nat_abs,int.coe_nat_le] at h,
exact h,
end
lemma int.abs_square (n : ℤ) : n ^ 2 = (abs n) ^ 2 := begin
by_cases h0 : n ≥ 0,
{rw[abs_of_nonneg h0]},
{rw[abs_of_neg (lt_of_not_ge h0),pow_two,pow_two,neg_mul_neg],}
end
lemma int.abs_square' (n : ℤ) : n ^ 2 = ((int.nat_abs n) ^ 2 : ℕ) :=
calc
n ^ 2 = n * n : pow_two n
... = ↑ (n.nat_abs * n.nat_abs) : int.nat_abs_mul_self.symm
... = ↑ (n.nat_abs ^ 2 : ℕ) : by rw[(pow_two n.nat_abs).symm]
lemma int.square_le {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} :
m ^ 2 ≤ n ↔ - (n.sqrt : ℤ) ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
begin
rw[int.abs_square',int.coe_nat_le,nat.square_le,int.abs_le'],
end
lemma int.square_lt {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} :
m ^ 2 < n.succ ↔ - (n.sqrt : ℤ) ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
begin
rw[int.abs_square',int.coe_nat_lt,nat.square_lt,int.abs_le'],
end
|
6ef92f625f3739569c5f2640cf61717526ec0dc0 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/typeclass_metas_internal_goals2.lean | 98a2df71077d79c5b84ff7be847b1767ba5d9b52 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 413 | lean |
class Foo (α β : Type) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Bar (α β : Type) : Type := (u : Unit := ())
class Top : Type := (u : Unit := ())
instance FooNatA (β : Type) : Foo Nat β := {u:=()}
instance BarANat (α : Type) : Bar α Nat := {u:=()}
set_option synthInstance.checkSynthOrder false in
instance FooBarToTop (α β : Type) [Foo α β] [Bar α β] : Top := {u:=()}
set_option pp.all true
#synth Top
|
90263087f6f33a692d903e26e6b27c90759ab35e | 969dbdfed67fda40a6f5a2b4f8c4a3c7dc01e0fb | /src/algebra/module/linear_map.lean | 6d8920ced26b250ffc5b7206c4b38b16cc6016b3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SAAluthwela/mathlib | 62044349d72dd63983a8500214736aa7779634d3 | 83a4b8b990907291421de54a78988c024dc8a552 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,433,873,417 | 1,615,998,031,000 | 1,615,998,031,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,859 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Anne Baanen
-/
import algebra.group.hom
import algebra.module.basic
import algebra.group_action_hom
/-!
# Linear maps and linear equivalences
In this file we define
* `linear_map R M M₂`, `M →ₗ[R] M₂` : a linear map between two R-`semimodule`s.
* `is_linear_map R f` : predicate saying that `f : M → M₂` is a linear map.
* `linear_equiv R M ₂`, `M ≃ₗ[R] M₂`: an invertible linear map
## Tags
linear map, linear equiv, linear equivalences, linear isomorphism, linear isomorphic
-/
open function
open_locale big_operators
universes u u' v w x y z
variables {R : Type u} {k : Type u'} {S : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type x} {M₃ : Type y}
{ι : Type z}
/-- A map `f` between semimodules over a semiring is linear if it satisfies the two properties
`f (x + y) = f x + f y` and `f (c • x) = c • f x`. The predicate `is_linear_map R f` asserts this
property. A bundled version is available with `linear_map`, and should be favored over
`is_linear_map` most of the time. -/
structure is_linear_map (R : Type u) {M : Type v} {M₂ : Type w}
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
(f : M → M₂) : Prop :=
(map_add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(map_smul : ∀ (c : R) x, f (c • x) = c • f x)
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A map `f` between semimodules over a semiring is linear if it satisfies the two properties
`f (x + y) = f x + f y` and `f (c • x) = c • f x`. Elements of `linear_map R M M₂` (available under
the notation `M →ₗ[R] M₂`) are bundled versions of such maps. An unbundled version is available with
the predicate `is_linear_map`, but it should be avoided most of the time. -/
structure linear_map (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (M₂ : Type w)
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends add_hom M M₂, M →[R] M₂
end
/-- The `add_hom` underlying a `linear_map`. -/
add_decl_doc linear_map.to_add_hom
/-- The `mul_action_hom` underlying a `linear_map`. -/
add_decl_doc linear_map.to_mul_action_hom
infixr ` →ₗ `:25 := linear_map _
notation M ` →ₗ[`:25 R:25 `] `:0 M₂:0 := linear_map R M M₂
namespace linear_map
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
section
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
/-- The `distrib_mul_action_hom` underlying a `linear_map`. -/
def to_distrib_mul_action_hom (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : distrib_mul_action_hom R M M₂ :=
{ map_zero' := zero_smul R (0 : M) ▸ zero_smul R (f.to_fun 0) ▸ f.map_smul' 0 0, ..f }
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨_, to_fun⟩
initialize_simps_projections linear_map (to_fun → apply)
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : M → M₂) (h₁ h₂) :
((linear_map.mk f h₁ h₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = f := rfl
/-- Identity map as a `linear_map` -/
def id : M →ₗ[R] M :=
⟨id, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
lemma id_apply (x : M) :
@id R M _ _ _ x = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma id_coe : ((linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) : M → M) = _root_.id :=
by { ext x, refl }
end
section
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
variables (f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe : f.to_fun = ⇑f := rfl
theorem is_linear : is_linear_map R f := ⟨f.2, f.3⟩
variables {f g}
theorem coe_injective : injective (λ f : M →ₗ[R] M₂, show M → M₂, from f) :=
by rintro ⟨f, _⟩ ⟨g, _⟩ ⟨h⟩; congr
@[ext] theorem ext (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_injective $ funext H
protected lemma congr_arg : Π {x x' : M}, x = x' → f x = f x'
| _ _ rfl := rfl
/-- If two linear maps are equal, they are equal at each point. -/
protected lemma congr_fun (h : f = g) (x : M) : f x = g x := h ▸ rfl
theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨by { rintro rfl x, refl }, ext⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_coe (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h₁ h₂) :
(linear_map.mk f h₁ h₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = f := ext $ λ _, rfl
variables (f g)
@[simp] lemma map_add (x y : M) : f (x + y) = f x + f y := f.map_add' x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (c : R) (x : M) : f (c • x) = c • f x := f.map_smul' c x
@[simp] lemma map_zero : f 0 = 0 :=
f.to_distrib_mul_action_hom.map_zero
variables (M M₂)
/--
A typeclass for `has_scalar` structures which can be moved through a `linear_map`.
This typeclass is generated automatically from a `is_scalar_tower` instance, but exists so that
we can also add an instance for `add_comm_group.int_module`, allowing `z •` to be moved even if
`R` does not support negation.
-/
class compatible_smul (R S : Type*) [semiring S] [has_scalar R M]
[semimodule S M] [has_scalar R M₂] [semimodule S M₂] :=
(map_smul : ∀ (f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) (c : R) (x : M), f (c • x) = c • f x)
variables {M M₂}
@[priority 100]
instance compatible_smul.is_scalar_tower
{R S : Type*} [semiring S] [has_scalar R S]
[has_scalar R M] [semimodule S M] [is_scalar_tower R S M]
[has_scalar R M₂] [semimodule S M₂] [is_scalar_tower R S M₂] : compatible_smul M M₂ R S :=
⟨λ f c x, by rw [← smul_one_smul S c x, ← smul_one_smul S c (f x), map_smul]⟩
@[simp, priority 900]
lemma map_smul_of_tower {R S : Type*} [semiring S] [has_scalar R M]
[semimodule S M] [has_scalar R M₂] [semimodule S M₂]
[compatible_smul M M₂ R S] (f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) (c : R) (x : M) :
f (c • x) = c • f x :=
compatible_smul.map_smul f c x
instance : is_add_monoid_hom f :=
{ map_add := map_add f,
map_zero := map_zero f }
/-- convert a linear map to an additive map -/
def to_add_monoid_hom : M →+ M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_zero' := f.map_zero,
map_add' := f.map_add }
@[simp] lemma to_add_monoid_hom_coe : ⇑f.to_add_monoid_hom = f := rfl
variable (R)
/-- If `M` and `M₂` are both `R`-semimodules and `S`-semimodules and `R`-semimodule structures
are defined by an action of `R` on `S` (formally, we have two scalar towers), then any `S`-linear
map from `M` to `M₂` is `R`-linear.
See also `linear_map.map_smul_of_tower`. -/
def restrict_scalars {S : Type*} [semiring S] [semimodule S M] [semimodule S M₂]
[compatible_smul M M₂ R S] (f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_add' := f.map_add,
map_smul' := f.map_smul_of_tower }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma map_sum {ι} {t : finset ι} {g : ι → M} :
f (∑ i in t, g i) = (∑ i in t, f (g i)) :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_sum _ _
theorem to_add_monoid_hom_injective :
function.injective (to_add_monoid_hom : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) → (M →+ M₂)) :=
λ f g h, ext $ add_monoid_hom.congr_fun h
/-- If two `R`-linear maps from `R` are equal on `1`, then they are equal. -/
@[ext] theorem ext_ring {f g : R →ₗ[R] M} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext $ λ x, by rw [← mul_one x, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul, g.map_smul, h]
theorem ext_ring_iff {f g : R →ₗ[R] M} : f = g ↔ f 1 = g 1 :=
⟨λ h, h ▸ rfl, ext_ring⟩
end
section
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
{semimodule_M₃ : semimodule R M₃}
variables (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- Composition of two linear maps is a linear map -/
def comp : M →ₗ[R] M₃ := ⟨f ∘ g, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (x : M) : f.comp g x = f (g x) := rfl
@[norm_cast]
lemma comp_coe : (f : M₂ → M₃) ∘ (g : M → M₂) = f.comp g := rfl
end
/-- If a function `g` is a left and right inverse of a linear map `f`, then `g` is linear itself. -/
def inverse [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ → M) (h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
M₂ →ₗ[R] M :=
by dsimp [left_inverse, function.right_inverse] at h₁ h₂; exact
⟨g, λ x y, by { rw [← h₁ (g (x + y)), ← h₁ (g x + g y)]; simp [h₂] },
λ a b, by { rw [← h₁ (g (a • b)), ← h₁ (a • g b)]; simp [h₂] }⟩
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂]
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
@[simp] lemma map_neg (x : M) : f (- x) = - f x :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_neg x
@[simp] lemma map_sub (x y : M) : f (x - y) = f x - f y :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_sub x y
instance : is_add_group_hom f :=
{ map_add := map_add f }
instance compatible_smul.int_module
{S : Type*} [semiring S] [semimodule ℤ M]
[semimodule S M] [semimodule ℤ M₂] [semimodule S M₂] : compatible_smul M M₂ ℤ S :=
⟨λ f c x, begin
induction c using int.induction_on,
case hz : { simp },
case hp : n ih { simpa [add_smul] using ih },
case hn : n ih { simpa [sub_smul] using ih }
end⟩
end add_comm_group
end linear_map
namespace is_linear_map
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
include R
/-- Convert an `is_linear_map` predicate to a `linear_map` -/
def mk' (f : M → M₂) (H : is_linear_map R f) : M →ₗ M₂ := ⟨f, H.1, H.2⟩
@[simp] theorem mk'_apply {f : M → M₂} (H : is_linear_map R f) (x : M) :
mk' f H x = f x := rfl
lemma is_linear_map_smul {R M : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
(c : R) :
is_linear_map R (λ (z : M), c • z) :=
begin
refine is_linear_map.mk (smul_add c) _,
intros _ _,
simp only [smul_smul, mul_comm]
end
lemma is_linear_map_smul' {R M : Type*} [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] (a : M) :
is_linear_map R (λ (c : R), c • a) :=
is_linear_map.mk (λ x y, add_smul x y a) (λ x y, mul_smul x y a)
variables {f : M → M₂} (lin : is_linear_map R f)
include M M₂ lin
lemma map_zero : f (0 : M) = (0 : M₂) := (lin.mk' f).map_zero
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
include R
lemma is_linear_map_neg :
is_linear_map R (λ (z : M), -z) :=
is_linear_map.mk neg_add (λ x y, (smul_neg x y).symm)
variables {f : M → M₂} (lin : is_linear_map R f)
include M M₂ lin
lemma map_neg (x : M) : f (- x) = - f x := (lin.mk' f).map_neg x
lemma map_sub (x y) : f (x - y) = f x - f y := (lin.mk' f).map_sub x y
end add_comm_group
end is_linear_map
/-- Linear endomorphisms of a module, with associated ring structure
`linear_map.endomorphism_semiring` and algebra structure `module.endomorphism_algebra`. -/
abbreviation module.End (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] := M →ₗ[R] M
/-- Reinterpret an additive homomorphism as a `ℤ`-linear map. -/
def add_monoid_hom.to_int_linear_map [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
M →ₗ[ℤ] M₂ :=
⟨f, f.map_add, f.map_int_module_smul⟩
/-- Reinterpret an additive homomorphism as a `ℚ`-linear map. -/
def add_monoid_hom.to_rat_linear_map [add_comm_group M] [vector_space ℚ M]
[add_comm_group M₂] [vector_space ℚ M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
M →ₗ[ℚ] M₂ :=
{ map_smul' := f.map_rat_module_smul, ..f }
/-! ### Linear equivalences -/
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A linear equivalence is an invertible linear map. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure linear_equiv (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (M₂ : Type w)
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends M →ₗ[R] M₂, M ≃+ M₂
end
attribute [nolint doc_blame] linear_equiv.to_linear_map
attribute [nolint doc_blame] linear_equiv.to_add_equiv
infix ` ≃ₗ ` := linear_equiv _
notation M ` ≃ₗ[`:50 R `] ` M₂ := linear_equiv R M M₂
namespace linear_equiv
section add_comm_monoid
variables {M₄ : Type*}
variables [semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
section
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
include R
instance : has_coe (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨to_linear_map⟩
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨_, λ f, f.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mk {to_fun inv_fun map_add map_smul left_inv right_inv } :
⇑(⟨to_fun, map_add, map_smul, inv_fun, left_inv, right_inv⟩ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) = to_fun :=
rfl
-- This exists for compatibility, previously `≃ₗ[R]` extended `≃` instead of `≃+`.
@[nolint doc_blame]
def to_equiv : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → M ≃ M₂ := λ f, f.to_add_equiv.to_equiv
lemma injective_to_equiv : function.injective (to_equiv : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → M ≃ M₂) :=
λ ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _⟩ ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _⟩ h, linear_equiv.mk.inj_eq.mpr (equiv.mk.inj h)
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_inj {e₁ e₂ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂} : e₁.to_equiv = e₂.to_equiv ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
injective_to_equiv.eq_iff
lemma injective_to_linear_map : function.injective (coe : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → (M →ₗ[R] M₂)) :=
λ e₁ e₂ H, injective_to_equiv $ equiv.ext $ linear_map.congr_fun H
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma to_linear_map_inj {e₁ e₂ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂} :
(e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = e₂ ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
injective_to_linear_map.eq_iff
end
section
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables (e e' : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
lemma to_linear_map_eq_coe : e.to_linear_map = ↑e := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_coe : ⇑(e : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_equiv : ⇑e.to_equiv = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_linear_map : ⇑e.to_linear_map = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe : e.to_fun = e := rfl
section
variables {e e'}
@[ext] lemma ext (h : ∀ x, e x = e' x) : e = e' :=
injective_to_equiv (equiv.ext h)
protected lemma congr_arg : Π {x x' : M}, x = x' → e x = e x'
| _ _ rfl := rfl
protected lemma congr_fun (h : e = e') (x : M) : e x = e' x := h ▸ rfl
lemma ext_iff : e = e' ↔ ∀ x, e x = e' x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, ext⟩
end
section
variables (M R)
/-- The identity map is a linear equivalence. -/
@[refl]
def refl [semimodule R M] : M ≃ₗ[R] M := { .. linear_map.id, .. equiv.refl M }
end
@[simp] lemma refl_apply [semimodule R M] (x : M) : refl R M x = x := rfl
/-- Linear equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ .. e.to_linear_map.inverse e.inv_fun e.left_inv e.right_inv,
.. e.to_equiv.symm }
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.inv_fun [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) : M₂ → M := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections linear_equiv (to_fun → apply, inv_fun → symm_apply)
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_eq_symm : e.inv_fun = e.symm := rfl
variables {semimodule_M₃ : semimodule R M₃} (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃)
/-- Linear equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans : M ≃ₗ[R] M₃ :=
{ .. e₂.to_linear_map.comp e₁.to_linear_map,
.. e₁.to_equiv.trans e₂.to_equiv }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_add_equiv : ⇑(e.to_add_equiv) = e := rfl
/-- The two paths coercion can take to an `add_monoid_hom` are equivalent -/
lemma to_add_monoid_hom_commutes :
e.to_linear_map.to_add_monoid_hom = e.to_add_equiv.to_add_monoid_hom :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (c : M) :
(e₁.trans e₂) c = e₂ (e₁ c) := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (c : M₂) : e (e.symm c) = c := e.6 c
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (b : M) : e.symm (e b) = b := e.5 b
@[simp] lemma symm_trans_apply (c : M₃) : (e₁.trans e₂).symm c = e₁.symm (e₂.symm c) := rfl
@[simp] lemma trans_refl : e.trans (refl R M₂) = e := injective_to_equiv e.to_equiv.trans_refl
@[simp] lemma refl_trans : (refl R M).trans e = e := injective_to_equiv e.to_equiv.refl_trans
lemma symm_apply_eq {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y := e.to_equiv.symm_apply_eq
lemma eq_symm_apply {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x := e.to_equiv.eq_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma trans_symm [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) :
f.trans f.symm = linear_equiv.refl R M :=
by { ext x, simp }
@[simp] lemma symm_trans [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) :
f.symm.trans f = linear_equiv.refl R M₂ :=
by { ext x, simp }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma refl_to_linear_map [semimodule R M] :
(linear_equiv.refl R M : M →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.id :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma comp_coe [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
(f' : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) : (f' : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f.trans f' : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_coe (h₁ h₂ f h₃ h₄) :
(linear_equiv.mk e h₁ h₂ f h₃ h₄ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) = e := ext $ λ _, rfl
@[simp] theorem map_add (a b : M) : e (a + b) = e a + e b := e.map_add' a b
@[simp] theorem map_zero : e 0 = 0 := e.to_linear_map.map_zero
@[simp] theorem map_smul (c : R) (x : M) : e (c • x) = c • e x := e.map_smul' c x
@[simp] lemma map_sum {s : finset ι} (u : ι → M) : e (∑ i in s, u i) = ∑ i in s, e (u i) :=
e.to_linear_map.map_sum
@[simp] theorem map_eq_zero_iff {x : M} : e x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
e.to_add_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
theorem map_ne_zero_iff {x : M} : e x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
e.to_add_equiv.map_ne_zero_iff
@[simp] theorem symm_symm : e.symm.symm = e := by { cases e, refl }
lemma symm_bijective [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] :
function.bijective (symm : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → (M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M)) :=
equiv.bijective ⟨symm, symm, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_coe' (f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
(linear_equiv.mk f h₁ h₂ ⇑e h₃ h₄ : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M) = e.symm :=
symm_bijective.injective $ ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_mk (f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
(⟨e, h₁, h₂, f, h₃, h₄⟩ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂).symm =
{ to_fun := f, inv_fun := e,
..(⟨e, h₁, h₂, f, h₃, h₄⟩ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂).symm } := rfl
protected lemma bijective : function.bijective e := e.to_equiv.bijective
protected lemma injective : function.injective e := e.to_equiv.injective
protected lemma surjective : function.surjective e := e.to_equiv.surjective
protected lemma image_eq_preimage (s : set M) : e '' s = e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.to_equiv.image_eq_preimage s
end
/-- An involutive linear map is a linear equivalence. -/
def of_involutive [semimodule R M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (hf : involutive f) : M ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ .. f, .. hf.to_equiv f }
@[simp] lemma coe_of_involutive [semimodule R M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (hf : involutive f) :
⇑(of_involutive f hf) = f :=
rfl
end add_comm_monoid
end linear_equiv
|
5848ff383c9a4443803ee4b31cf1178daa7eb866 | 976d2334b51721ddc405deb2e1754016d454286e | /src/game_files/sqrt2/sq_eq_zero2.lean | fa9a134e62ae1fbb95563188a3a634f6c85c300b | [] | no_license | kbuzzard/lean-at-MC2020 | 11bb6ac9ec38a6caace9d5d9a1705d6794d9f477 | 1f7ca65a7ba5cc17eb49f525c02dc6b0e65d6543 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,496,422,317 | 1,594,131,838,000 | 1,594,131,838,000 | 277,877,735 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,594,142,006,000 | 1,594,142,005,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 143 | lean | lemma sq_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero (m : ℕ) : m^2 = 0 ↔ m = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ apply eq_zero_of_sq_eq_zero },
intro h, rw h, ring,
end |
9e896c20b2278f544ede191627119a920ee9aeac | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/monoidal/End.lean | 872bc5a39375725eb13bc5619804747f8ecbec91 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,527 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.monoidal.functor
/-!
# Endofunctors as a monoidal category.
We give the monoidal category structure on `C ⥤ C`,
and show that when `C` itself is monoidal, it embeds via a monoidal functor into `C ⥤ C`.
## TODO
Can we use this to show coherence results, e.g. a cheap proof that `λ_ (𝟙_ C) = ρ_ (𝟙_ C)`?
I suspect this is harder than is usually made out.
-/
universes v u
namespace category_theory
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
/--
The category of endofunctors of any category is a monoidal category,
with tensor product given by composition of functors
(and horizontal composition of natural transformations).
-/
def endofunctor_monoidal_category : monoidal_category (C ⥤ C) :=
{ tensor_obj := λ F G, F ⋙ G,
tensor_hom := λ F G F' G' α β, nat_trans.hcomp α β,
tensor_unit := 𝟭 C,
associator := λ F G H, functor.associator F G H,
left_unitor := λ F, functor.left_unitor F,
right_unitor := λ F, functor.right_unitor F, }.
open category_theory.monoidal_category
variables [monoidal_category.{v} C]
local attribute [instance] endofunctor_monoidal_category
local attribute [reducible] endofunctor_monoidal_category
/--
Tensoring on the right gives a monoidal functor from `C` into endofunctors of `C`.
-/
@[simps]
def tensoring_right_monoidal : monoidal_functor C (C ⥤ C) :=
{ ε := (right_unitor_nat_iso C).inv,
μ := λ X Y,
{ app := λ Z, (α_ Z X Y).hom,
naturality' := λ Z Z' f, by { dsimp, rw associator_naturality, simp, } },
μ_natural' := λ X Y X' Y' f g, by { ext Z, dsimp, simp [associator_naturality], },
associativity' := λ X Y Z, by { ext W, dsimp, simp [pentagon], },
left_unitality' := λ X, by { ext Y, dsimp, rw [category.id_comp, triangle, ←tensor_comp], simp, },
right_unitality' := λ X,
begin
ext Y, dsimp,
rw [tensor_id, category.comp_id, right_unitor_tensor_inv, category.assoc, iso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
←id_tensor_comp, iso.inv_hom_id, tensor_id],
end,
ε_is_iso := by apply_instance,
μ_is_iso := λ X Y,
{ inv :=
-- We could avoid needing to do this explicitly by
-- constructing a partially applied analogue of `associator_nat_iso`.
{ app := λ Z, (α_ Z X Y).inv,
naturality' := λ Z Z' f, by { dsimp, rw ←associator_inv_naturality, simp, } }, },
..tensoring_right C }.
end category_theory
|
6320ba3b6b628f0736fd277871732ec647fd6e48 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/representation_theory/maschke.lean | 0eee7243865a4b133e9f15788b627d4776c46d8f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,491 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.monoid_algebra.basic
import algebra.char_p.invertible
import linear_algebra.basis
/-!
# Maschke's theorem
We prove **Maschke's theorem** for finite groups,
in the formulation that every submodule of a `k[G]` module has a complement,
when `k` is a field with `invertible (fintype.card G : k)`.
We do the core computation in greater generality.
For any `[comm_ring k]` in which `[invertible (fintype.card G : k)]`,
and a `k[G]`-linear map `i : V → W` which admits a `k`-linear retraction `π`,
we produce a `k[G]`-linear retraction by
taking the average over `G` of the conjugates of `π`.
## Implementation Notes
* These results assume `invertible (fintype.card G : k)` which is equivalent to the more
familiar `¬(ring_char k ∣ fintype.card G)`. It is possible to convert between them using
`invertible_of_ring_char_not_dvd` and `not_ring_char_dvd_of_invertible`.
## Future work
It's not so far to give the usual statement, that every finite dimensional representation
of a finite group is semisimple (i.e. a direct sum of irreducibles).
-/
universes u
noncomputable theory
open module
open monoid_algebra
open_locale big_operators
section
-- At first we work with any `[comm_ring k]`, and add the assumption that
-- `[invertible (fintype.card G : k)]` when it is required.
variables {k : Type u} [comm_ring k] {G : Type u} [group G]
variables {V : Type u} [add_comm_group V] [module k V] [module (monoid_algebra k G) V]
variables [is_scalar_tower k (monoid_algebra k G) V]
variables {W : Type u} [add_comm_group W] [module k W] [module (monoid_algebra k G) W]
variables [is_scalar_tower k (monoid_algebra k G) W]
/-!
We now do the key calculation in Maschke's theorem.
Given `V → W`, an inclusion of `k[G]` modules,,
assume we have some retraction `π` (i.e. `∀ v, π (i v) = v`),
just as a `k`-linear map.
(When `k` is a field, this will be available cheaply, by choosing a basis.)
We now construct a retraction of the inclusion as a `k[G]`-linear map,
by the formula
$$ \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} g⁻¹ • π(g • -). $$
-/
namespace linear_map
variables (π : W →ₗ[k] V)
include π
/--
We define the conjugate of `π` by `g`, as a `k`-linear map.
-/
def conjugate (g : G) : W →ₗ[k] V :=
((group_smul.linear_map k V g⁻¹).comp π).comp (group_smul.linear_map k W g)
variables (i : V →ₗ[monoid_algebra k G] W) (h : ∀ v : V, π (i v) = v)
section
include h
lemma conjugate_i (g : G) (v : V) : (conjugate π g) (i v) = v :=
begin
dsimp [conjugate],
simp only [←i.map_smul, h, ←mul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_one, mul_left_inv],
change (1 : monoid_algebra k G) • v = v,
simp,
end
end
variables (G) [fintype G]
/--
The sum of the conjugates of `π` by each element `g : G`, as a `k`-linear map.
(We postpone dividing by the size of the group as long as possible.)
-/
def sum_of_conjugates : W →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ g : G, π.conjugate g
/--
In fact, the sum over `g : G` of the conjugate of `π` by `g` is a `k[G]`-linear map.
-/
def sum_of_conjugates_equivariant : W →ₗ[monoid_algebra k G] V :=
monoid_algebra.equivariant_of_linear_of_comm (π.sum_of_conjugates G) (λ g v,
begin
simp only [sum_of_conjugates, linear_map.sum_apply,
-- We have a `module (monoid_algebra k G)` instance but are working with `finsupp`s,
-- so help the elaborator unfold everything correctly.
@finset.smul_sum (monoid_algebra k G)],
dsimp [conjugate],
conv_lhs
{ rw [←finset.univ_map_embedding (mul_right_embedding g⁻¹)],
simp only [mul_right_embedding], },
simp only [←mul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_inv_rev, mul_one, function.embedding.coe_fn_mk,
finset.sum_map, inv_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
end)
section
variables [inv : invertible (fintype.card G : k)]
include inv
/--
We construct our `k[G]`-linear retraction of `i` as
$$ \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} g⁻¹ • π(g • -). $$
-/
def equivariant_projection : W →ₗ[monoid_algebra k G] V :=
⅟(fintype.card G : k) • (π.sum_of_conjugates_equivariant G)
include h
lemma equivariant_projection_condition (v : V) : (π.equivariant_projection G) (i v) = v :=
begin
rw [equivariant_projection, smul_apply, sum_of_conjugates_equivariant,
equivariant_of_linear_of_comm_apply, sum_of_conjugates],
rw [linear_map.sum_apply],
simp only [conjugate_i π i h],
rw [finset.sum_const, finset.card_univ, nsmul_eq_smul_cast k,
←mul_smul, invertible.inv_of_mul_self, one_smul],
end
end
end linear_map
end
namespace char_zero
variables {k : Type u} [field k] {G : Type u} [fintype G] [group G] [char_zero k]
instance : invertible (fintype.card G : k) :=
invertible_of_ring_char_not_dvd (by simp [fintype.card_eq_zero_iff])
end char_zero
namespace monoid_algebra
-- Now we work over a `[field k]`.
variables {k : Type u} [field k] {G : Type u} [fintype G] [invertible (fintype.card G : k)]
variables [group G]
variables {V : Type u} [add_comm_group V] [module k V] [module (monoid_algebra k G) V]
variables [is_scalar_tower k (monoid_algebra k G) V]
variables {W : Type u} [add_comm_group W] [module k W] [module (monoid_algebra k G) W]
variables [is_scalar_tower k (monoid_algebra k G) W]
lemma exists_left_inverse_of_injective
(f : V →ₗ[monoid_algebra k G] W) (hf : f.ker = ⊥) :
∃ (g : W →ₗ[monoid_algebra k G] V), g.comp f = linear_map.id :=
begin
obtain ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := (f.restrict_scalars k).exists_left_inverse_of_injective
(by simp only [hf, submodule.restrict_scalars_bot, linear_map.ker_restrict_scalars]),
refine ⟨φ.equivariant_projection G, _⟩,
apply linear_map.ext,
intro v,
simp only [linear_map.id_coe, id.def, linear_map.comp_apply],
apply linear_map.equivariant_projection_condition,
intro v,
have := congr_arg linear_map.to_fun hφ,
exact congr_fun this v
end
namespace submodule
lemma exists_is_compl
(p : submodule (monoid_algebra k G) V) :
∃ q : submodule (monoid_algebra k G) V, is_compl p q :=
let ⟨f, hf⟩ := monoid_algebra.exists_left_inverse_of_injective p.subtype p.ker_subtype in
⟨f.ker, linear_map.is_compl_of_proj $ linear_map.ext_iff.1 hf⟩
/-- This also implies an instance `is_semisimple_module (monoid_algebra k G) V`. -/
instance complemented_lattice : complemented_lattice (submodule (monoid_algebra k G) V) :=
⟨exists_is_compl⟩
end submodule
end monoid_algebra
|
405a8979395d22156eda41af17c39d758dcb7300 | 92b50235facfbc08dfe7f334827d47281471333b | /library/data/quotient/util.lean | 174bd121b2b8dfe9f0eb16caf0eba2554a1be303 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | htzh/lean | 24f6ed7510ab637379ec31af406d12584d31792c | d70c79f4e30aafecdfc4a60b5d3512199200ab6e | refs/heads/master | 1,607,677,731,270 | 1,437,089,952,000 | 1,437,089,952,000 | 37,078,816 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,433,780,956,000 | 1,433,780,955,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,023 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
-/
import logic ..prod algebra.relation
open prod eq.ops
namespace quotient
/- auxiliary facts about products -/
variables {A B : Type}
/- flip -/
definition flip (a : A × B) : B × A := pair (pr2 a) (pr1 a)
theorem flip_def (a : A × B) : flip a = pair (pr2 a) (pr1 a) := rfl
theorem flip_pair (a : A) (b : B) : flip (pair a b) = pair b a := rfl
theorem flip_pr1 (a : A × B) : pr1 (flip a) = pr2 a := rfl
theorem flip_pr2 (a : A × B) : pr2 (flip a) = pr1 a := rfl
theorem flip_flip (a : A × B) : flip (flip a) = a :=
destruct a (take x y, rfl)
theorem P_flip {P : A → B → Prop} (a : A × B) (H : P (pr1 a) (pr2 a))
: P (pr2 (flip a)) (pr1 (flip a)) :=
(flip_pr1 a)⁻¹ ▸ (flip_pr2 a)⁻¹ ▸ H
theorem flip_inj {a b : A × B} (H : flip a = flip b) : a = b :=
have H2 : flip (flip a) = flip (flip b), from congr_arg flip H,
show a = b, from (flip_flip a) ▸ (flip_flip b) ▸ H2
/- coordinatewise unary maps -/
definition map_pair (f : A → B) (a : A × A) : B × B :=
pair (f (pr1 a)) (f (pr2 a))
theorem map_pair_def (f : A → B) (a : A × A)
: map_pair f a = pair (f (pr1 a)) (f (pr2 a)) :=
rfl
theorem map_pair_pair (f : A → B) (a a' : A)
: map_pair f (pair a a') = pair (f a) (f a') :=
(pr1.mk a a') ▸ (pr2.mk a a') ▸ rfl
theorem map_pair_pr1 (f : A → B) (a : A × A) : pr1 (map_pair f a) = f (pr1 a) :=
by esimp
theorem map_pair_pr2 (f : A → B) (a : A × A) : pr2 (map_pair f a) = f (pr2 a) :=
by esimp
/- coordinatewise binary maps -/
definition map_pair2 {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) (a : A × A) (b : B × B) : C × C :=
pair (f (pr1 a) (pr1 b)) (f (pr2 a) (pr2 b))
theorem map_pair2_def {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) (a : A × A) (b : B × B) :
map_pair2 f a b = pair (f (pr1 a) (pr1 b)) (f (pr2 a) (pr2 b)) := rfl
theorem map_pair2_pair {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) (a a' : A) (b b' : B) :
map_pair2 f (pair a a') (pair b b') = pair (f a b) (f a' b') :=
calc
map_pair2 f (pair a a') (pair b b')
= pair (f (pr1 (pair a a')) b) (f (pr2 (pair a a')) (pr2 (pair b b')))
: {pr1.mk b b'}
... = pair (f (pr1 (pair a a')) b) (f (pr2 (pair a a')) b') : {pr2.mk b b'}
... = pair (f (pr1 (pair a a')) b) (f a' b') : {pr2.mk a a'}
... = pair (f a b) (f a' b') : {pr1.mk a a'}
theorem map_pair2_pr1 {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) (a : A × A) (b : B × B) :
pr1 (map_pair2 f a b) = f (pr1 a) (pr1 b) := by esimp
theorem map_pair2_pr2 {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) (a : A × A) (b : B × B) :
pr2 (map_pair2 f a b) = f (pr2 a) (pr2 b) := by esimp
theorem map_pair2_flip {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) (a : A × A) (b : B × B) :
flip (map_pair2 f a b) = map_pair2 f (flip a) (flip b) :=
have Hx : pr1 (flip (map_pair2 f a b)) = pr1 (map_pair2 f (flip a) (flip b)), from
calc
pr1 (flip (map_pair2 f a b)) = pr2 (map_pair2 f a b) : flip_pr1 _
... = f (pr2 a) (pr2 b) : map_pair2_pr2 f a b
... = f (pr1 (flip a)) (pr2 b) : {(flip_pr1 a)⁻¹}
... = f (pr1 (flip a)) (pr1 (flip b)) : {(flip_pr1 b)⁻¹}
... = pr1 (map_pair2 f (flip a) (flip b)) : (map_pair2_pr1 f _ _)⁻¹,
have Hy : pr2 (flip (map_pair2 f a b)) = pr2 (map_pair2 f (flip a) (flip b)), from
calc
pr2 (flip (map_pair2 f a b)) = pr1 (map_pair2 f a b) : flip_pr2 _
... = f (pr1 a) (pr1 b) : map_pair2_pr1 f a b
... = f (pr2 (flip a)) (pr1 b) : {flip_pr2 a}
... = f (pr2 (flip a)) (pr2 (flip b)) : {flip_pr2 b}
... = pr2 (map_pair2 f (flip a) (flip b)) : (map_pair2_pr2 f _ _)⁻¹,
pair_eq Hx Hy
-- add_rewrite flip_pr1 flip_pr2 flip_pair
-- add_rewrite map_pair_pr1 map_pair_pr2 map_pair_pair
-- add_rewrite map_pair2_pr1 map_pair2_pr2 map_pair2_pair
theorem map_pair2_comm {A B : Type} {f : A → A → B} (Hcomm : ∀a b : A, f a b = f b a)
(v w : A × A) : map_pair2 f v w = map_pair2 f w v :=
have Hx : pr1 (map_pair2 f v w) = pr1 (map_pair2 f w v), from
calc
pr1 (map_pair2 f v w) = f (pr1 v) (pr1 w) : map_pair2_pr1 f v w
... = f (pr1 w) (pr1 v) : Hcomm _ _
... = pr1 (map_pair2 f w v) : (map_pair2_pr1 f w v)⁻¹,
have Hy : pr2 (map_pair2 f v w) = pr2 (map_pair2 f w v), from
calc
pr2 (map_pair2 f v w) = f (pr2 v) (pr2 w) : map_pair2_pr2 f v w
... = f (pr2 w) (pr2 v) : Hcomm _ _
... = pr2 (map_pair2 f w v) : (map_pair2_pr2 f w v)⁻¹,
pair_eq Hx Hy
theorem map_pair2_assoc {A : Type} {f : A → A → A}
(Hassoc : ∀a b c : A, f (f a b) c = f a (f b c)) (u v w : A × A) :
map_pair2 f (map_pair2 f u v) w = map_pair2 f u (map_pair2 f v w) :=
have Hx : pr1 (map_pair2 f (map_pair2 f u v) w) =
pr1 (map_pair2 f u (map_pair2 f v w)), from
calc
pr1 (map_pair2 f (map_pair2 f u v) w)
= f (pr1 (map_pair2 f u v)) (pr1 w) : map_pair2_pr1 f _ _
... = f (f (pr1 u) (pr1 v)) (pr1 w) : {map_pair2_pr1 f _ _}
... = f (pr1 u) (f (pr1 v) (pr1 w)) : Hassoc (pr1 u) (pr1 v) (pr1 w)
... = f (pr1 u) (pr1 (map_pair2 f v w)) : by rewrite [map_pair2_pr1 f]
... = pr1 (map_pair2 f u (map_pair2 f v w)) : (map_pair2_pr1 f _ _)⁻¹,
have Hy : pr2 (map_pair2 f (map_pair2 f u v) w) =
pr2 (map_pair2 f u (map_pair2 f v w)), from
calc
pr2 (map_pair2 f (map_pair2 f u v) w)
= f (pr2 (map_pair2 f u v)) (pr2 w) : map_pair2_pr2 f _ _
... = f (f (pr2 u) (pr2 v)) (pr2 w) : {map_pair2_pr2 f _ _}
... = f (pr2 u) (f (pr2 v) (pr2 w)) : Hassoc (pr2 u) (pr2 v) (pr2 w)
... = f (pr2 u) (pr2 (map_pair2 f v w)) : {map_pair2_pr2 f _ _}
... = pr2 (map_pair2 f u (map_pair2 f v w)) : (map_pair2_pr2 f _ _)⁻¹,
pair_eq Hx Hy
theorem map_pair2_id_right {A B : Type} {f : A → B → A} {e : B} (Hid : ∀a : A, f a e = a)
(v : A × A) : map_pair2 f v (pair e e) = v :=
have Hx : pr1 (map_pair2 f v (pair e e)) = pr1 v, from
(calc
pr1 (map_pair2 f v (pair e e)) = f (pr1 v) (pr1 (pair e e)) : by simp
... = f (pr1 v) e : by simp
... = pr1 v : Hid (pr1 v)),
have Hy : pr2 (map_pair2 f v (pair e e)) = pr2 v, from
(calc
pr2 (map_pair2 f v (pair e e)) = f (pr2 v) (pr2 (pair e e)) : by simp
... = f (pr2 v) e : by simp
... = pr2 v : Hid (pr2 v)),
prod.eq Hx Hy
theorem map_pair2_id_left {A B : Type} {f : B → A → A} {e : B} (Hid : ∀a : A, f e a = a)
(v : A × A) : map_pair2 f (pair e e) v = v :=
have Hx : pr1 (map_pair2 f (pair e e) v) = pr1 v, from
calc
pr1 (map_pair2 f (pair e e) v) = f (pr1 (pair e e)) (pr1 v) : by simp
... = f e (pr1 v) : by simp
... = pr1 v : Hid (pr1 v),
have Hy : pr2 (map_pair2 f (pair e e) v) = pr2 v, from
calc
pr2 (map_pair2 f (pair e e) v) = f (pr2 (pair e e)) (pr2 v) : by simp
... = f e (pr2 v) : by simp
... = pr2 v : Hid (pr2 v),
prod.eq Hx Hy
end quotient
|
fc20c772a589ea515d30cb3558ba7ac5adcf3c80 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/topology/bases.lean | 0dc17441b19f6d715f2993dc664872c07aeea852 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,042 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import topology.continuous_on
/-!
# Bases of topologies. Countability axioms.
A topological basis on a topological space `t` is a collection of sets,
such that all open sets can be generated as unions of these sets, without the need to take
finite intersections of them. This file introduces a framework for dealing with these collections,
and also what more we can say under certain countability conditions on bases,
which are referred to as first- and second-countable.
We also briefly cover the theory of separable spaces, which are those with a countable, dense
subset. If a space is second-countable, and also has a countably generated uniformity filter
(for example, if `t` is a metric space), it will automatically be separable (and indeed, these
conditions are equivalent in this case).
## Main definitions
* `is_topological_basis s`: The topological space `t` has basis `s`.
* `separable_space α`: The topological space `t` has a countable, dense subset.
* `first_countable_topology α`: A topology in which `𝓝 x` is countably generated for every `x`.
* `second_countable_topology α`: A topology which has a topological basis which is countable.
## Main results
* `first_countable_topology.tendsto_subseq`: In a first-countable space,
cluster points are limits of subsequences.
* `second_countable_topology.is_open_Union_countable`: In a second-countable space, the union of
arbitrarily-many open sets is equal to a sub-union of only countably many of these sets.
* `second_countable_topology.countable_cover_nhds`: Consider `f : α → set α` with the property that
`f x ∈ 𝓝 x` for all `x`. Then there is some countable set `s` whose image covers the space.
## Implementation Notes
For our applications we are interested that there exists a countable basis, but we do not need the
concrete basis itself. This allows us to declare these type classes as `Prop` to use them as mixins.
### TODO:
More fine grained instances for `first_countable_topology`, `separable_space`, `t2_space`, and more
(see the comment below `subtype.second_countable_topology`.)
-/
open set filter classical
open_locale topological_space filter
noncomputable theory
namespace topological_space
universe u
variables {α : Type u} [t : topological_space α]
include t
/-- A topological basis is one that satisfies the necessary conditions so that
it suffices to take unions of the basis sets to get a topology (without taking
finite intersections as well). -/
structure is_topological_basis (s : set (set α)) : Prop :=
(exists_subset_inter : ∀t₁∈s, ∀t₂∈s, ∀ x ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, ∃ t₃∈s, x ∈ t₃ ∧ t₃ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂)
(sUnion_eq : (⋃₀ s) = univ)
(eq_generate_from : t = generate_from s)
/-- If a family of sets `s` generates the topology, then nonempty intersections of finite
subcollections of `s` form a topological basis. -/
lemma is_topological_basis_of_subbasis {s : set (set α)} (hs : t = generate_from s) :
is_topological_basis ((λ f, ⋂₀ f) '' {f : set (set α) | finite f ∧ f ⊆ s ∧ (⋂₀ f).nonempty}) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ rintro _ ⟨t₁, ⟨hft₁, ht₁b, ht₁⟩, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t₂, ⟨hft₂, ht₂b, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩ x h,
have : ⋂₀ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = ⋂₀ t₁ ∩ ⋂₀ t₂ := sInter_union t₁ t₂,
exact ⟨_, ⟨t₁ ∪ t₂, ⟨hft₁.union hft₂, union_subset ht₁b ht₂b, this.symm ▸ ⟨x, h⟩⟩, this⟩, h,
subset.rfl⟩ },
{ rw [sUnion_image, bUnion_eq_univ_iff],
intro x, have : x ∈ ⋂₀ ∅, { rw sInter_empty, exact mem_univ x },
exact ⟨∅, ⟨finite_empty, empty_subset _, x, this⟩, this⟩ },
{ rw hs,
apply le_antisymm; apply le_generate_from,
{ rintro _ ⟨t, ⟨hft, htb, ht⟩, rfl⟩,
exact @is_open_sInter _ (generate_from s) _ hft (λ s hs, generate_open.basic _ $ htb hs) },
{ intros t ht,
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|hne, { apply @is_open_empty _ _ },
rw ← sInter_singleton t at hne ⊢,
exact generate_open.basic _ ⟨{t}, ⟨finite_singleton t, singleton_subset_iff.2 ht, hne⟩,
rfl⟩ } }
end
/-- If a family of open sets `s` is such that every open neighbourhood contains some
member of `s`, then `s` is a topological basis. -/
lemma is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds {s : set (set α)}
(h_open : ∀ u ∈ s, is_open u)
(h_nhds : ∀(a:α) (u : set α), a ∈ u → is_open u → ∃v ∈ s, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u) :
is_topological_basis s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ x hx, h_nhds _ _ hx (is_open.inter (h_open _ ht₁) (h_open _ ht₂)), _, _⟩,
{ refine sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 (λ a, _),
rcases h_nhds a univ trivial is_open_univ with ⟨u, h₁, h₂, -⟩,
exact ⟨u, h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ refine (le_generate_from h_open).antisymm (λ u hu, _),
refine (@is_open_iff_nhds α (generate_from s) u).mpr (λ a ha, _),
rcases h_nhds a u ha hu with ⟨v, hvs, hav, hvu⟩,
rw nhds_generate_from,
exact binfi_le_of_le v ⟨hav, hvs⟩ (le_principal_iff.2 hvu) }
end
/-- A set `s` is in the neighbourhood of `a` iff there is some basis set `t`, which
contains `a` and is itself contained in `s`. -/
lemma is_topological_basis.mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : set α} {b : set (set α)}
(hb : is_topological_basis b) : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃t∈b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
begin
change s ∈ (𝓝 a).sets ↔ ∃t∈b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s,
rw [hb.eq_generate_from, nhds_generate_from, binfi_sets_eq],
{ simp only [mem_bUnion_iff, exists_prop, mem_set_of_eq, and_assoc, and.left_comm], refl },
{ exact assume s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩,
have a ∈ s ∩ t, from ⟨hs₁, ht₁⟩,
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩ := hb.1 _ hs₂ _ ht₂ _ this in
⟨u, ⟨hu₂, hu₁⟩, le_principal_iff.2 (subset.trans hu₃ (inter_subset_left _ _)),
le_principal_iff.2 (subset.trans hu₃ (inter_subset_right _ _))⟩ },
{ rcases eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb.sUnion_eq a with ⟨i, h1, h2⟩,
exact ⟨i, h2, h1⟩ }
end
lemma is_topological_basis.nhds_has_basis {b : set (set α)} (hb : is_topological_basis b) {a : α} :
(𝓝 a).has_basis (λ t : set α, t ∈ b ∧ a ∈ t) (λ t, t) :=
⟨λ s, hb.mem_nhds_iff.trans $ by simp only [exists_prop, and_assoc]⟩
protected lemma is_topological_basis.is_open {s : set α} {b : set (set α)}
(hb : is_topological_basis b) (hs : s ∈ b) : is_open s :=
by { rw hb.eq_generate_from, exact generate_open.basic s hs }
lemma is_topological_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open {b : set (set α)}
(hb : is_topological_basis b) {a:α} {u : set α} (au : a ∈ u)
(ou : is_open u) : ∃v ∈ b, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
hb.mem_nhds_iff.1 $ is_open.mem_nhds ou au
/-- Any open set is the union of the basis sets contained in it. -/
lemma is_topological_basis.open_eq_sUnion' {B : set (set α)}
(hB : is_topological_basis B) {u : set α} (ou : is_open u) :
u = ⋃₀ {s ∈ B | s ⊆ u} :=
ext $ λ a,
⟨λ ha, let ⟨b, hb, ab, bu⟩ := hB.exists_subset_of_mem_open ha ou in ⟨b, ⟨hb, bu⟩, ab⟩,
λ ⟨b, ⟨hb, bu⟩, ab⟩, bu ab⟩
lemma is_topological_basis.open_eq_sUnion {B : set (set α)}
(hB : is_topological_basis B) {u : set α} (ou : is_open u) :
∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨{s ∈ B | s ⊆ u}, λ s h, h.1, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou⟩
lemma is_topological_basis.open_eq_Union {B : set (set α)}
(hB : is_topological_basis B) {u : set α} (ou : is_open u) :
∃ (β : Type u) (f : β → set α), u = (⋃ i, f i) ∧ ∀ i, f i ∈ B :=
⟨↥{s ∈ B | s ⊆ u}, coe, by { rw ← sUnion_eq_Union, apply hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou }, λ s, and.left s.2⟩
/-- A point `a` is in the closure of `s` iff all basis sets containing `a` intersect `s`. -/
lemma is_topological_basis.mem_closure_iff {b : set (set α)} (hb : is_topological_basis b)
{s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).nonempty :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' hb.nhds_has_basis).trans $ by simp only [and_imp]
/-- A set is dense iff it has non-trivial intersection with all basis sets. -/
lemma is_topological_basis.dense_iff {b : set (set α)} (hb : is_topological_basis b) {s : set α} :
dense s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, set.nonempty o → (o ∩ s).nonempty :=
begin
simp only [dense, hb.mem_closure_iff],
exact ⟨λ h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩, h a o hb ha, λ h a o hb ha, h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
end
protected lemma is_topological_basis.prod {β} [topological_space β] {B₁ : set (set α)}
{B₂ : set (set β)} (h₁ : is_topological_basis B₁) (h₂ : is_topological_basis B₂) :
is_topological_basis (image2 set.prod B₁ B₂) :=
begin
refine is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds _ _,
{ rintro _ ⟨u₁, u₂, hu₁, hu₂, rfl⟩,
exact (h₁.is_open hu₁).prod (h₂.is_open hu₂) },
{ rintro ⟨a, b⟩ u hu uo,
rcases (h₁.nhds_has_basis.prod_nhds h₂.nhds_has_basis).mem_iff.1 (is_open.mem_nhds uo hu)
with ⟨⟨s, t⟩, ⟨⟨hs, ha⟩, ht, hb⟩, hu⟩,
exact ⟨s.prod t, mem_image2_of_mem hs ht, ⟨ha, hb⟩, hu⟩ }
end
lemma is_topological_basis_of_cover {ι} {U : ι → set α} (Uo : ∀ i, is_open (U i))
(Uc : (⋃ i, U i) = univ) {b : Π i, set (set (U i))} (hb : ∀ i, is_topological_basis (b i)) :
is_topological_basis (⋃ i : ι, image (coe : U i → α) '' (b i)) :=
begin
refine is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds (λ u hu, _) _,
{ simp only [mem_Union, mem_image] at hu,
rcases hu with ⟨i, s, sb, rfl⟩,
exact (Uo i).is_open_map_subtype_coe _ ((hb i).is_open sb) },
{ intros a u ha uo,
rcases Union_eq_univ_iff.1 Uc a with ⟨i, hi⟩,
lift a to ↥(U i) using hi,
rcases (hb i).exists_subset_of_mem_open (by exact ha) (uo.preimage continuous_subtype_coe)
with ⟨v, hvb, hav, hvu⟩,
exact ⟨coe '' v, mem_Union.2 ⟨i, mem_image_of_mem _ hvb⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hav,
image_subset_iff.2 hvu⟩ }
end
variables (α)
/-- A separable space is one with a countable dense subset, available through
`topological_space.exists_countable_dense`. If `α` is also known to be nonempty, then
`topological_space.dense_seq` provides a sequence `ℕ → α` with dense range, see
`topological_space.dense_range_dense_seq`.
If `α` is a uniform space with countably generated uniformity filter (e.g., an `emetric_space`),
then this condition is equivalent to `topological_space.second_countable_topology α`. In this case
the latter should be used as a typeclass argument in theorems because Lean can automatically deduce
`separable_space` from `second_countable_topology` but it can't deduce `second_countable_topology`
and `emetric_space`. -/
class separable_space : Prop :=
(exists_countable_dense : ∃s:set α, countable s ∧ dense s)
lemma exists_countable_dense [separable_space α] :
∃ s : set α, countable s ∧ dense s :=
separable_space.exists_countable_dense
/-- A nonempty separable space admits a sequence with dense range. Instead of running `cases` on the
conclusion of this lemma, you might want to use `topological_space.dense_seq` and
`topological_space.dense_range_dense_seq`.
If `α` might be empty, then `exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use separability of `α`. -/
lemma exists_dense_seq [separable_space α] [nonempty α] : ∃ u : ℕ → α, dense_range u :=
begin
obtain ⟨s : set α, hs, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α,
cases countable_iff_exists_surjective.mp hs with u hu,
exact ⟨u, s_dense.mono hu⟩,
end
/-- A dense sequence in a non-empty separable topological space.
If `α` might be empty, then `exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use separability of `α`. -/
def dense_seq [separable_space α] [nonempty α] : ℕ → α := classical.some (exists_dense_seq α)
/-- The sequence `dense_seq α` has dense range. -/
@[simp] lemma dense_range_dense_seq [separable_space α] [nonempty α] :
dense_range (dense_seq α) := classical.some_spec (exists_dense_seq α)
end topological_space
open topological_space
/-- If `α` is a separable space and `f : α → β` is a continuous map with dense range, then `β` is
a separable space as well. E.g., the completion of a separable uniform space is separable. -/
protected lemma dense_range.separable_space {α β : Type*} [topological_space α] [separable_space α]
[topological_space β] {f : α → β} (h : dense_range f) (h' : continuous f) :
separable_space β :=
let ⟨s, s_cnt, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α in
⟨⟨f '' s, countable.image s_cnt f, h.dense_image h' s_dense⟩⟩
namespace topological_space
universe u
variables (α : Type u) [t : topological_space α]
include t
/-- A first-countable space is one in which every point has a
countable neighborhood basis. -/
class first_countable_topology : Prop :=
(nhds_generated_countable : ∀a:α, (𝓝 a).is_countably_generated)
namespace first_countable_topology
variable {α}
/-- In a first-countable space, a cluster point `x` of a sequence
is the limit of some subsequence. -/
lemma tendsto_subseq [first_countable_topology α] {u : ℕ → α} {x : α}
(hx : map_cluster_pt x at_top u) :
∃ (ψ : ℕ → ℕ), (strict_mono ψ) ∧ (tendsto (u ∘ ψ) at_top (𝓝 x)) :=
(nhds_generated_countable x).subseq_tendsto hx
end first_countable_topology
variables {α}
lemma is_countably_generated_nhds [first_countable_topology α] (x : α) :
is_countably_generated (𝓝 x) :=
first_countable_topology.nhds_generated_countable x
lemma is_countably_generated_nhds_within [first_countable_topology α] (x : α) (s : set α) :
is_countably_generated (𝓝[s] x) :=
(is_countably_generated_nhds x).inf_principal s
variable (α)
/-- A second-countable space is one with a countable basis. -/
class second_countable_topology : Prop :=
(is_open_generated_countable [] :
∃ b : set (set α), countable b ∧ t = topological_space.generate_from b)
variable {α}
protected lemma is_topological_basis.second_countable_topology
{b : set (set α)} (hb : is_topological_basis b) (hc : countable b) :
second_countable_topology α :=
⟨⟨b, hc, hb.eq_generate_from⟩⟩
variable (α)
lemma exists_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] :
∃b:set (set α), countable b ∧ ∅ ∉ b ∧ is_topological_basis b :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := second_countable_topology.is_open_generated_countable α in
let b' := (λs, ⋂₀ s) '' {s:set (set α) | finite s ∧ s ⊆ b ∧ (⋂₀ s).nonempty} in
⟨b',
((countable_set_of_finite_subset hb₁).mono
(by { simp only [← and_assoc], apply inter_subset_left })).image _,
assume ⟨s, ⟨_, _, hn⟩, hp⟩, absurd hn (not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.2 hp),
is_topological_basis_of_subbasis hb₂⟩
/-- A countable topological basis of `α`. -/
def countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] : set (set α) :=
(exists_countable_basis α).some
lemma countable_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] : countable (countable_basis α) :=
(exists_countable_basis α).some_spec.1
instance encodable_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] :
encodable (countable_basis α) :=
(countable_countable_basis α).to_encodable
lemma empty_nmem_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] : ∅ ∉ countable_basis α :=
(exists_countable_basis α).some_spec.2.1
lemma is_basis_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] :
is_topological_basis (countable_basis α) :=
(exists_countable_basis α).some_spec.2.2
lemma eq_generate_from_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] :
‹topological_space α› = generate_from (countable_basis α) :=
(is_basis_countable_basis α).eq_generate_from
variable {α}
lemma is_open_of_mem_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] {s : set α}
(hs : s ∈ countable_basis α) : is_open s :=
(is_basis_countable_basis α).is_open hs
lemma nonempty_of_mem_countable_basis [second_countable_topology α] {s : set α}
(hs : s ∈ countable_basis α) : s.nonempty :=
ne_empty_iff_nonempty.1 $ ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hs $ empty_nmem_countable_basis α
variable (α)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance second_countable_topology.to_first_countable_topology
[second_countable_topology α] : first_countable_topology α :=
⟨λ x, has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated $
⟨(is_basis_countable_basis α).nhds_has_basis, (countable_countable_basis α).mono $
inter_subset_left _ _⟩⟩
/-- If `β` is a second-countable space, then its induced topology
via `f` on `α` is also second-countable. -/
lemma second_countable_topology_induced (β)
[t : topological_space β] [second_countable_topology β] (f : α → β) :
@second_countable_topology α (t.induced f) :=
begin
rcases second_countable_topology.is_open_generated_countable β with ⟨b, hb, eq⟩,
refine { is_open_generated_countable := ⟨preimage f '' b, hb.image _, _⟩ },
rw [eq, induced_generate_from_eq]
end
instance subtype.second_countable_topology (s : set α) [second_countable_topology α] :
second_countable_topology s :=
second_countable_topology_induced s α coe
/- TODO: more fine grained instances for first_countable_topology, separable_space, t2_space, ... -/
instance {β : Type*} [topological_space β]
[second_countable_topology α] [second_countable_topology β] : second_countable_topology (α × β) :=
((is_basis_countable_basis α).prod (is_basis_countable_basis β)).second_countable_topology $
(countable_countable_basis α).image2 (countable_countable_basis β) _
instance second_countable_topology_fintype {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
[fintype ι] [t : ∀a, topological_space (π a)] [sc : ∀a, second_countable_topology (π a)] :
second_countable_topology (∀a, π a) :=
begin
have : t = (λa, generate_from (countable_basis (π a))),
from funext (assume a, (is_basis_countable_basis (π a)).eq_generate_from),
rw this,
constructor,
refine ⟨pi univ '' pi univ (λ a, countable_basis (π a)), countable.image _ _, _⟩,
{ suffices : countable {f : Πa, set (π a) | ∀a, f a ∈ countable_basis (π a)}, { simpa [pi] },
exact countable_pi (assume i, (countable_countable_basis _)), },
rw [pi_generate_from_eq_fintype],
{ congr' 1 with f, simp [pi, eq_comm] },
exact assume a, (is_basis_countable_basis (π a)).sUnion_eq
end
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance second_countable_topology.to_separable_space
[second_countable_topology α] : separable_space α :=
begin
choose p hp using λ s : countable_basis α, nonempty_of_mem_countable_basis s.2,
exact ⟨⟨range p, countable_range _,
(is_basis_countable_basis α).dense_iff.2 $ λ o ho _, ⟨p ⟨o, ho⟩, hp _, mem_range_self _⟩⟩⟩
end
variables {α}
/-- A countable open cover induces a second-countable topology if all open covers
are themselves second countable. -/
lemma second_countable_topology_of_countable_cover {ι} [encodable ι] {U : ι → set α}
[∀ i, second_countable_topology (U i)] (Uo : ∀ i, is_open (U i)) (hc : (⋃ i, U i) = univ) :
second_countable_topology α :=
begin
have : is_topological_basis (⋃ i, image (coe : U i → α) '' (countable_basis (U i))),
from is_topological_basis_of_cover Uo hc (λ i, is_basis_countable_basis (U i)),
exact this.second_countable_topology
(countable_Union $ λ i, (countable_countable_basis _).image _)
end
/-- In a second-countable space, an open set, given as a union of open sets,
is equal to the union of countably many of those sets. -/
lemma is_open_Union_countable [second_countable_topology α]
{ι} (s : ι → set α) (H : ∀ i, is_open (s i)) :
∃ T : set ι, countable T ∧ (⋃ i ∈ T, s i) = ⋃ i, s i :=
begin
let B := {b ∈ countable_basis α | ∃ i, b ⊆ s i},
choose f hf using λ b : B, b.2.2,
haveI : encodable B := ((countable_countable_basis α).mono (sep_subset _ _)).to_encodable,
refine ⟨_, countable_range f,
subset.antisymm (bUnion_subset_Union _ _) (sUnion_subset _)⟩,
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ x xs,
rcases (is_basis_countable_basis α).exists_subset_of_mem_open xs (H _) with ⟨b, hb, xb, bs⟩,
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, ⟨⟨⟨_, hb, _, bs⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf _ (by exact xb)⟩
end
lemma is_open_sUnion_countable [second_countable_topology α]
(S : set (set α)) (H : ∀ s ∈ S, is_open s) :
∃ T : set (set α), countable T ∧ T ⊆ S ∧ ⋃₀ T = ⋃₀ S :=
let ⟨T, cT, hT⟩ := is_open_Union_countable (λ s:S, s.1) (λ s, H s.1 s.2) in
⟨subtype.val '' T, cT.image _,
image_subset_iff.2 $ λ ⟨x, xs⟩ xt, xs,
by rwa [sUnion_image, sUnion_eq_Union]⟩
/-- In a topological space with second countable topology, if `f` is a function that sends each
point `x` to a neighborhood of `x`, then for some countable set `s`, the neighborhoods `f x`,
`x ∈ s`, cover the whole space. -/
lemma countable_cover_nhds [second_countable_topology α] {f : α → set α}
(hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ s : set α, countable s ∧ (⋃ x ∈ s, f x) = univ :=
begin
rcases is_open_Union_countable (λ x, interior (f x)) (λ x, is_open_interior) with ⟨s, hsc, hsU⟩,
suffices : (⋃ x ∈ s, interior (f x)) = univ,
from ⟨s, hsc, flip eq_univ_of_subset this (bUnion_mono $ λ _ _, interior_subset)⟩,
simp only [hsU, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_Union],
exact λ x, ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hf x)⟩
end
end topological_space
open topological_space
variables {α β : Type*} [topological_space α] [topological_space β] {f : α → β}
protected lemma inducing.second_countable_topology [second_countable_topology β]
(hf : inducing f) : second_countable_topology α :=
by { rw hf.1, exact second_countable_topology_induced α β f }
protected lemma embedding.second_countable_topology [second_countable_topology β]
(hf : embedding f) : second_countable_topology α :=
hf.1.second_countable_topology
|
c5ee50956ab57df85d10824dcc989d355f699175 | 2385ce0e3b60d8dbea33dd439902a2070cca7a24 | /tests/lean/run/1685.lean | 7de58d60c5a6dde4bdbfc271673b9018d90620b9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | TehMillhouse/lean | 68d6fdd2fb11a6c65bc28dec308d70f04dad38b4 | 6bbf2fbd8912617e5a973575bab8c383c9c268a1 | refs/heads/master | 1,620,830,893,339 | 1,515,592,479,000 | 1,515,592,997,000 | 116,964,828 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,515,592,734,000 | 1,515,592,734,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,622 | lean | /- This test assumes the total order on terms used by simp compares local constants
using the order they appear in the local context. -/
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, m + n = k → n + m = k := by intros; simp; assumption
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
example (m : ℕ) : ∀ n k, n + m = k → n + m = k :=
begin intros, simp, fail_if_success {assumption}, sorry end
|
d8d20000f34ae5359992d528a703036293ba12c3 | 2eab05920d6eeb06665e1a6df77b3157354316ad | /src/linear_algebra/matrix/nonsingular_inverse.lean | e247fa8e54051c6875368c818677803ae5553a3d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ayush1801/mathlib | 78949b9f789f488148142221606bf15c02b960d2 | ce164e28f262acbb3de6281b3b03660a9f744e3c | refs/heads/master | 1,692,886,907,941 | 1,635,270,866,000 | 1,635,270,866,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 31,211 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Tim Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import algebra.associated
import algebra.regular.smul
import data.matrix.notation
import linear_algebra.matrix.polynomial
import tactic.linarith
import tactic.ring_exp
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible
determinant. For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a
more general notion of pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
The adjugate is calculated with Cramer's rule, which we introduce first.
The vectors returned by Cramer's rule are given by the linear map `cramer`,
which sends a matrix `A` and vector `b` to the vector consisting of the
determinant of replacing the `i`th column of `A` with `b` at index `i`
(written as `(A.update_column i b).det`).
Using Cramer's rule, we can compute for each matrix `A` the matrix `adjugate A`.
The entries of the adjugate are the determinants of each minor of `A`.
Instead of defining a minor to be `A` with row `i` and column `j` deleted, we
replace the `i`th row of `A` with the `j`th basis vector; this has the same
determinant as the minor but more importantly equals Cramer's rule applied
to `A` and the `j`th basis vector, simplifying the subsequent proofs.
We prove the adjugate behaves like `det A • A⁻¹`. Finally, we show that dividing
the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`), will
result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace matrix
universes u v
variables {n : Type u} [decidable_eq n] [fintype n] {α : Type v} [comm_ring α]
open_locale matrix big_operators
open equiv equiv.perm finset
section cramer
/-!
### `cramer` section
Introduce the linear map `cramer` with values defined by `cramer_map`.
After defining `cramer_map` and showing it is linear,
we will restrict our proofs to using `cramer`.
-/
variables (A : matrix n n α) (b : n → α)
/--
`cramer_map A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramer_map A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A ⬝ x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramer_map A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramer_map` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramer_map (i : n) : α := (A.update_column i b).det
lemma cramer_map_is_linear (i : n) : is_linear_map α (λ b, cramer_map A b i) :=
{ map_add := det_update_column_add _ _,
map_smul := det_update_column_smul _ _ }
lemma cramer_is_linear : is_linear_map α (cramer_map A) :=
begin
split; intros; ext i,
{ apply (cramer_map_is_linear A i).1 },
{ apply (cramer_map_is_linear A i).2 }
end
/--
`cramer A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramer A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A ⬝ x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramer A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramer` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramer (A : matrix n n α) : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (n → α) :=
is_linear_map.mk' (cramer_map A) (cramer_is_linear A)
lemma cramer_apply (i : n) : cramer A b i = (A.update_column i b).det := rfl
lemma cramer_transpose_row_self (i : n) :
Aᵀ.cramer (A i) = pi.single i A.det :=
begin
ext j,
rw [cramer_apply, pi.single_apply],
split_ifs with h,
{ -- i = j: this entry should be `A.det`
subst h,
simp only [update_column_transpose, det_transpose, update_row, function.update_eq_self] },
{ -- i ≠ j: this entry should be 0
rw [update_column_transpose, det_transpose],
apply det_zero_of_row_eq h,
rw [update_row_self, update_row_ne (ne.symm h)] }
end
lemma cramer_row_self (i : n) (h : ∀ j, b j = A j i) :
A.cramer b = pi.single i A.det :=
begin
rw [← transpose_transpose A, det_transpose],
convert cramer_transpose_row_self Aᵀ i,
exact funext h
end
@[simp] lemma cramer_one : cramer (1 : matrix n n α) = 1 :=
begin
ext i j,
convert congr_fun (cramer_row_self (1 : matrix n n α) (pi.single i 1) i _) j,
{ simp },
{ intros j, rw [matrix.one_eq_pi_single, pi.single_comm] }
end
lemma cramer_smul (r : α) (A : matrix n n α) :
cramer (r • A) = r ^ (fintype.card n - 1) • cramer A :=
linear_map.ext $ λ b, funext $ λ _, det_update_column_smul' _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma cramer_subsingleton_apply [subsingleton n] (A : matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (i : n) :
cramer A b i = b i :=
by rw [cramer_apply, det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ i, update_column_self]
lemma cramer_zero [nontrivial n] : cramer (0 : matrix n n α) = 0 :=
begin
ext i j,
obtain ⟨j', hj'⟩ : ∃ j', j' ≠ j := exists_ne j,
apply det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero j',
intro j'',
simp [update_column_ne hj'],
end
/-- Use linearity of `cramer` to take it out of a summation. -/
lemma sum_cramer {β} (s : finset β) (f : β → n → α) :
∑ x in s, cramer A (f x) = cramer A (∑ x in s, f x) :=
(linear_map.map_sum (cramer A)).symm
/-- Use linearity of `cramer` and vector evaluation to take `cramer A _ i` out of a summation. -/
lemma sum_cramer_apply {β} (s : finset β) (f : n → β → α) (i : n) :
∑ x in s, cramer A (λ j, f j x) i = cramer A (λ (j : n), ∑ x in s, f j x) i :=
calc ∑ x in s, cramer A (λ j, f j x) i
= (∑ x in s, cramer A (λ j, f j x)) i : (finset.sum_apply i s _).symm
... = cramer A (λ (j : n), ∑ x in s, f j x) i :
by { rw [sum_cramer, cramer_apply], congr' with j, apply finset.sum_apply }
end cramer
section adjugate
/-!
### `adjugate` section
Define the `adjugate` matrix and a few equations.
These will hold for any matrix over a commutative ring,
while the `inv` section is specifically for invertible matrices.
-/
/-- The adjugate matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix.
Typically, the cofactor matrix is defined by taking the determinant of minors,
i.e. the matrix with a row and column removed.
However, the proof of `mul_adjugate` becomes a lot easier if we define the
minor as replacing a column with a basis vector, since it allows us to use
facts about the `cramer` map.
-/
def adjugate (A : matrix n n α) : matrix n n α := λ i, cramer Aᵀ (pi.single i 1)
lemma adjugate_def (A : matrix n n α) :
adjugate A = λ i, cramer Aᵀ (pi.single i 1) := rfl
lemma adjugate_apply (A : matrix n n α) (i j : n) :
adjugate A i j = (A.update_row j (pi.single i 1)).det :=
by { rw adjugate_def, simp only, rw [cramer_apply, update_column_transpose, det_transpose], }
lemma adjugate_transpose (A : matrix n n α) : (adjugate A)ᵀ = adjugate (Aᵀ) :=
begin
ext i j,
rw [transpose_apply, adjugate_apply, adjugate_apply, update_row_transpose, det_transpose],
rw [det_apply', det_apply'],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
intros σ _,
congr' 1,
by_cases i = σ j,
{ -- Everything except `(i , j)` (= `(σ j , j)`) is given by A, and the rest is a single `1`.
congr; ext j',
subst h,
have : σ j' = σ j ↔ j' = j := σ.injective.eq_iff,
rw [update_row_apply, update_column_apply],
simp_rw this,
rw [←dite_eq_ite, ←dite_eq_ite],
congr' 1 with rfl,
rw [pi.single_eq_same, pi.single_eq_same], },
{ -- Otherwise, we need to show that there is a `0` somewhere in the product.
have : (∏ j' : n, update_column A j (pi.single i 1) (σ j') j') = 0,
{ apply prod_eq_zero (mem_univ j),
rw [update_column_self, pi.single_eq_of_ne' h], },
rw this,
apply prod_eq_zero (mem_univ (σ⁻¹ i)),
erw [apply_symm_apply σ i, update_row_self],
apply pi.single_eq_of_ne,
intro h',
exact h ((symm_apply_eq σ).mp h') }
end
/-- Since the map `b ↦ cramer A b` is linear in `b`, it must be multiplication by some matrix. This
matrix is `A.adjugate`. -/
lemma cramer_eq_adjugate_mul_vec (A : matrix n n α) (b : n → α) :
cramer A b = A.adjugate.mul_vec b :=
begin
nth_rewrite 1 ← A.transpose_transpose,
rw [← adjugate_transpose, adjugate_def],
have : b = ∑ i, (b i) • (pi.single i 1),
{ refine (pi_eq_sum_univ b).trans _, congr' with j, simp [pi.single_apply, eq_comm], congr, },
nth_rewrite 0 this, ext k,
simp [mul_vec, dot_product, mul_comm],
end
lemma mul_adjugate_apply (A : matrix n n α) (i j k) :
A i k * adjugate A k j = cramer Aᵀ (pi.single k (A i k)) j :=
begin
erw [←smul_eq_mul, ←pi.smul_apply, ←linear_map.map_smul, ←pi.single_smul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one],
end
lemma mul_adjugate (A : matrix n n α) : A ⬝ adjugate A = A.det • 1 :=
begin
ext i j,
rw [mul_apply, pi.smul_apply, pi.smul_apply, one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_boole],
simp [mul_adjugate_apply, sum_cramer_apply, cramer_transpose_row_self, pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
end
lemma adjugate_mul (A : matrix n n α) : adjugate A ⬝ A = A.det • 1 :=
calc adjugate A ⬝ A = (Aᵀ ⬝ (adjugate Aᵀ))ᵀ :
by rw [←adjugate_transpose, ←transpose_mul, transpose_transpose]
... = A.det • 1 : by rw [mul_adjugate (Aᵀ), det_transpose, transpose_smul, transpose_one]
lemma adjugate_smul (r : α) (A : matrix n n α) :
adjugate (r • A) = r ^ (fintype.card n - 1) • adjugate A :=
begin
rw [adjugate, adjugate, transpose_smul, cramer_smul],
refl,
end
/-- `det_adjugate_of_cancel` is an auxiliary lemma for computing `(adjugate A).det`,
used in `det_adjugate_eq_one` and `det_adjugate_of_is_unit`.
The formula for the determinant of the adjugate of an `n` by `n` matrix `A`
is in general `(adjugate A).det = A.det ^ (n - 1)`, but the proof differs in several cases.
This lemma `det_adjugate_of_cancel` covers the case that `det A` cancels
on the left of the equation `A.det * b = A.det ^ n`.
-/
lemma det_adjugate_of_cancel {A : matrix n n α}
(h : ∀ b, A.det * b = A.det ^ fintype.card n → b = A.det ^ (fintype.card n - 1)) :
(adjugate A).det = A.det ^ (fintype.card n - 1) :=
h (adjugate A).det (calc A.det * (adjugate A).det = (A ⬝ adjugate A).det : (det_mul _ _).symm
... = A.det ^ fintype.card n : by simp [mul_adjugate])
lemma adjugate_subsingleton [subsingleton n] (A : matrix n n α) : adjugate A = 1 :=
begin
ext i j,
simp [subsingleton.elim i j, adjugate_apply, det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ i]
end
lemma adjugate_eq_one_of_card_eq_one {A : matrix n n α} (h : fintype.card n = 1) : adjugate A = 1 :=
begin
haveI : subsingleton n := fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le,
exact adjugate_subsingleton _
end
@[simp] lemma adjugate_zero [nontrivial n] : adjugate (0 : matrix n n α) = 0 :=
begin
ext i j,
obtain ⟨j', hj'⟩ : ∃ j', j' ≠ j := exists_ne j,
apply det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero j',
intro j'',
simp [update_column_ne hj'],
end
@[simp] lemma adjugate_one : adjugate (1 : matrix n n α) = 1 :=
by { ext, simp [adjugate_def, matrix.one_apply, pi.single_apply, eq_comm] }
lemma det_adjugate_eq_one {A : matrix n n α} (h : A.det = 1) : (adjugate A).det = 1 :=
calc (adjugate A).det
= A.det ^ (fintype.card n - 1) : det_adjugate_of_cancel (λ b hb, by simpa [h] using hb)
... = 1 : by rw [h, one_pow]
/-- `det_adjugate_of_is_unit` gives the formula for `(adjugate A).det` if `A.det` has an inverse.
The formula for the determinant of the adjugate of an `n` by `n` matrix `A`
is in general `(adjugate A).det = A.det ^ (n - 1)`, but the proof differs in several cases.
This lemma `det_adjugate_of_is_unit` covers the case that `det A` has an inverse.
-/
lemma det_adjugate_of_is_unit {A : matrix n n α} (h : is_unit A.det) :
(adjugate A).det = A.det ^ (fintype.card n - 1) :=
begin
rcases is_unit_iff_exists_inv'.mp h with ⟨a, ha⟩,
by_cases card_lt_zero : fintype.card n ≤ 0,
{ have h : fintype.card n = 0 := by linarith,
simp [det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero h] },
have zero_lt_card : 0 < fintype.card n := by linarith,
have n_nonempty : nonempty n := fintype.card_pos_iff.mp zero_lt_card,
by_cases card_lt_one : fintype.card n ≤ 1,
{ have h : fintype.card n = 1 := by linarith,
simp [h, adjugate_eq_one_of_card_eq_one h] },
have one_lt_card : 1 < fintype.card n := by linarith,
have zero_lt_card_sub_one : 0 < fintype.card n - 1 :=
(tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right (refl 1)).mpr one_lt_card,
apply det_adjugate_of_cancel,
intros b hb,
calc b = a * (det A ^ (fintype.card n - 1 + 1)) :
by rw [←one_mul b, ←ha, mul_assoc, hb, tsub_add_cancel_of_le zero_lt_card.nat_succ_le]
... = a * det A * det A ^ (fintype.card n - 1) : by ring_exp
... = det A ^ (fintype.card n - 1) : by rw [ha, one_mul]
end
@[simp] lemma adjugate_fin_zero (A : matrix (fin 0) (fin 0) α) : adjugate A = 0 :=
@subsingleton.elim _ matrix.subsingleton_of_empty_left _ _
@[simp] lemma adjugate_fin_one (A : matrix (fin 1) (fin 1) α) : adjugate A = 1 :=
adjugate_subsingleton A
lemma adjugate_fin_two (A : matrix (fin 2) (fin 2) α) :
adjugate A = ![![A 1 1, -A 0 1], ![-A 1 0, A 0 0]] :=
begin
ext i j,
rw [adjugate_apply, det_fin_two],
fin_cases i with [0, 1]; fin_cases j with [0, 1];
simp only [nat.one_ne_zero, one_mul, fin.one_eq_zero_iff, pi.single_eq_same, zero_mul,
fin.zero_eq_one_iff, sub_zero, pi.single_eq_of_ne, ne.def, not_false_iff, update_row_self,
update_row_ne, cons_val_zero, mul_zero, mul_one, zero_sub, cons_val_one, head_cons],
end
@[simp] lemma adjugate_fin_two' (a b c d : α) :
adjugate ![![a, b], ![c, d]] = ![![d, -b], ![-c, a]] :=
adjugate_fin_two _
end adjugate
section inv
/-!
### `inv` section
Defines the matrix `A⁻¹` and proves it is the inverse matrix
of a square matrix `A` as long as `det A` has a multiplicative inverse.
-/
variables (A : matrix n n α) (B : matrix n n α)
open_locale classical
lemma is_unit_det_transpose (h : is_unit A.det) : is_unit Aᵀ.det :=
by { rw det_transpose, exact h, }
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise).-/
noncomputable instance : has_inv (matrix n n α) := ⟨λ A, ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
lemma inv_def (A : matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate := rfl
lemma nonsing_inv_apply_not_is_unit (h : ¬ is_unit A.det) :
A⁻¹ = 0 :=
by rw [inv_def, ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
lemma nonsing_inv_apply (h : is_unit A.det) :
A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate :=
begin
rw [inv_def, ←ring.inverse_unit h.unit],
refl,
end
lemma transpose_nonsing_inv : (A⁻¹)ᵀ = (Aᵀ)⁻¹ :=
by rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp] lemma mul_nonsing_inv (h : is_unit A.det) : A ⬝ A⁻¹ = 1 :=
by rw [A.nonsing_inv_apply h, mul_smul, mul_adjugate, smul_smul,
units.inv_mul_of_eq h.unit_spec, one_smul]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp] lemma nonsing_inv_mul (h : is_unit A.det) : A⁻¹ ⬝ A = 1 :=
calc A⁻¹ ⬝ A = (Aᵀ ⬝ (Aᵀ)⁻¹)ᵀ : by { rw [transpose_mul,
Aᵀ.transpose_nonsing_inv,
transpose_transpose], }
... = 1ᵀ : by { rw Aᵀ.mul_nonsing_inv, exact A.is_unit_det_transpose h, }
... = 1 : transpose_one
lemma nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero :
(A⁻¹ ⬝ A = 1 ∧ A ⬝ A⁻¹ = 1) ∨ A⁻¹ = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h : is_unit A.det,
{ exact or.inl ⟨nonsing_inv_mul _ h, mul_nonsing_inv _ h⟩ },
{ exact or.inr (nonsing_inv_apply_not_is_unit _ h) }
end
@[simp] lemma nonsing_inv_det (h : is_unit A.det) : A⁻¹.det * A.det = 1 :=
by rw [←det_mul, A.nonsing_inv_mul h, det_one]
lemma is_unit_nonsing_inv_det (h : is_unit A.det) : is_unit A⁻¹.det :=
is_unit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (A.nonsing_inv_det h)
@[simp] lemma nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv (h : is_unit A.det) : (A⁻¹)⁻¹ = A :=
calc (A⁻¹)⁻¹ = 1 ⬝ (A⁻¹)⁻¹ : by rw matrix.one_mul
... = A ⬝ A⁻¹ ⬝ (A⁻¹)⁻¹ : by rw A.mul_nonsing_inv h
... = A : by { rw [matrix.mul_assoc,
(A⁻¹).mul_nonsing_inv (A.is_unit_nonsing_inv_det h),
matrix.mul_one], }
@[simp] lemma is_unit_nonsing_inv_det_iff {A : matrix n n α} :
is_unit A⁻¹.det ↔ is_unit A.det :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, is_unit_nonsing_inv_det _⟩,
nontriviality α,
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty n,
{ simp },
contrapose! h,
rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_is_unit _ h, det_zero],
{ simp },
{ apply_instance }
end
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertible_of_det_invertible [invertible A.det] : invertible A :=
{ inv_of := ⅟A.det • A.adjugate,
mul_inv_of_self :=
by rw [mul_smul_comm, matrix.mul_eq_mul, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, inv_of_mul_self, one_smul],
inv_of_mul_self :=
by rw [smul_mul_assoc, matrix.mul_eq_mul, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, inv_of_mul_self, one_smul] }
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def det_invertible_of_left_inverse (h : B ⬝ A = 1) : invertible A.det :=
{ inv_of := B.det,
mul_inv_of_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one],
inv_of_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one] }
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def det_invertible_of_right_inverse (h : A ⬝ B = 1) : invertible A.det :=
{ inv_of := B.det,
mul_inv_of_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one],
inv_of_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one] }
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def det_invertible_of_invertible [invertible A] : invertible A.det :=
det_invertible_of_left_inverse A (⅟A) (inv_of_mul_self _)
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `units (matrix n n α)`-/
def unit_of_det_invertible [invertible A.det] : units (matrix n n α) :=
@unit_of_invertible _ _ A (invertible_of_det_invertible A)
/-- A matrix whose determinant is a unit is itself a unit. This is a noncomputable version of
`matrix.units_of_det_invertible`, with the inverse defeq to `matrix.nonsing_inv`. -/
noncomputable def nonsing_inv_unit (h : is_unit A.det) : units (matrix n n α) :=
{ val := A,
inv := A⁻¹,
val_inv := by { rw matrix.mul_eq_mul, apply A.mul_nonsing_inv h, },
inv_val := by { rw matrix.mul_eq_mul, apply A.nonsing_inv_mul h, } }
lemma unit_of_det_invertible_eq_nonsing_inv_unit [invertible A.det] :
unit_of_det_invertible A = nonsing_inv_unit A (is_unit_of_invertible _) :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- When lowered to a prop, `matrix.det_invertible_of_invertible` and
`matrix.invertible_of_det_invertible` form an `iff`. -/
lemma is_unit_iff_is_unit_det : is_unit A ↔ is_unit A.det :=
begin
split; rintros ⟨x, hx⟩; refine @is_unit_of_invertible _ _ _ (id _),
{ haveI : invertible A := hx.rec x.invertible,
apply det_invertible_of_invertible, },
{ haveI : invertible A.det := hx.rec x.invertible,
apply invertible_of_det_invertible, },
end
/- `is_unit_of_invertible A`
converts the "stronger" condition `invertible A` to proposition `is_unit A`. -/
/-- `matrix.is_unit_det_of_invertible` converts `invertible A` to `is_unit A.det`. -/
lemma is_unit_det_of_invertible [invertible A] : is_unit A.det :=
@is_unit_of_invertible _ _ _(det_invertible_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
lemma inv_eq_nonsing_inv_of_invertible [invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ :=
begin
suffices : is_unit A,
{ rw [←this.mul_left_inj, inv_of_mul_self, matrix.mul_eq_mul, nonsing_inv_mul],
rwa ←is_unit_iff_is_unit_det },
exact is_unit_of_invertible _
end
variables {A} {B}
/- `is_unit.invertible` lifts the proposition `is_unit A` to a constructive inverse of `A`. -/
/-- "Lift" the proposition `is_unit A.det` to a constructive inverse of `A`. -/
noncomputable def invertible_of_is_unit_det (h : is_unit A.det) : invertible A :=
⟨A⁻¹, nonsing_inv_mul A h, mul_nonsing_inv A h⟩
lemma is_unit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B ⬝ A = 1) : is_unit A.det :=
@is_unit_of_invertible _ _ _ (det_invertible_of_left_inverse _ _ h)
lemma is_unit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A ⬝ B = 1) : is_unit A.det :=
@is_unit_of_invertible _ _ _ (det_invertible_of_right_inverse _ _ h)
lemma det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [nontrivial α] (h : B ⬝ A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
is_unit.ne_zero (matrix.is_unit_det_of_left_inverse h)
lemma det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [nontrivial α] (h : A ⬝ B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
is_unit.ne_zero (matrix.is_unit_det_of_right_inverse h)
lemma nonsing_inv_left_right (h : A ⬝ B = 1) : B ⬝ A = 1 :=
begin
have h' : is_unit B.det := is_unit_det_of_left_inverse h,
calc B ⬝ A = (B ⬝ A) ⬝ (B ⬝ B⁻¹) : by simp only [h', matrix.mul_one, mul_nonsing_inv]
... = B ⬝ ((A ⬝ B) ⬝ B⁻¹) : by simp only [matrix.mul_assoc]
... = B ⬝ B⁻¹ : by simp only [h, matrix.one_mul]
... = 1 : mul_nonsing_inv B h',
end
lemma nonsing_inv_right_left (h : B ⬝ A = 1) : A ⬝ B = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_left_right h
/-- If matrix A is left invertible, then its inverse equals its left inverse. -/
lemma inv_eq_left_inv (h : B ⬝ A = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
begin
have h1 := (is_unit_det_of_left_inverse h),
have h2 := matrix.invertible_of_is_unit_det h1,
have := @inv_of_eq_left_inv (matrix n n α) (infer_instance) A B h2 h,
simp* at *,
end
/-- If matrix A is right invertible, then its inverse equals its right inverse. -/
lemma inv_eq_right_inv (h : A ⬝ B = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
begin
have h1 := (is_unit_det_of_right_inverse h),
have h2 := matrix.invertible_of_is_unit_det h1,
have := @inv_of_eq_right_inv (matrix n n α) (infer_instance) A B h2 h,
simp* at *,
end
/-- We can construct an instance of invertible A if A has a left inverse. -/
def invertible_of_left_inverse (h: B ⬝ A = 1) : invertible A :=
⟨B, h, nonsing_inv_right_left h⟩
/-- We can construct an instance of invertible A if A has a right inverse. -/
def invertible_of_right_inverse (h: A ⬝ B = 1) : invertible A :=
⟨B, nonsing_inv_left_right h, h⟩
section inv_eq_inv
variables {C : matrix n n α}
/-- The left inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
lemma left_inv_eq_left_inv (h: B ⬝ A = 1) (g: C ⬝ A = 1) : B = C :=
by rw [←(inv_eq_left_inv h), ←(inv_eq_left_inv g)]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
lemma right_inv_eq_right_inv (h: A ⬝ B = 1) (g: A ⬝ C = 1) : B = C :=
by rw [←(inv_eq_right_inv h), ←(inv_eq_right_inv g)]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A equals the left inverse of A when they exist. -/
lemma right_inv_eq_left_inv (h: A ⬝ B = 1) (g: C ⬝ A = 1) : B = C :=
by rw [←(inv_eq_right_inv h), ←(inv_eq_left_inv g)]
lemma inv_inj (h : A⁻¹ = B⁻¹) (h' : is_unit A.det) : A = B :=
begin
refine left_inv_eq_left_inv (mul_nonsing_inv _ h') _,
rw h,
refine mul_nonsing_inv _ _,
rwa [←is_unit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, ←h, is_unit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
end
end inv_eq_inv
variable (A)
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_of_invertible [invertible A] : A ⬝ A⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_nonsing_inv A (is_unit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp] lemma inv_mul_of_invertible [invertible A] : A⁻¹ ⬝ A = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_mul A (is_unit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp] lemma inv_zero : (0 : matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 0 :=
begin
casesI (subsingleton_or_nontrivial α) with ht ht,
{ simp },
cases (fintype.card n).zero_le.eq_or_lt with hc hc,
{ rw [eq_comm, fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hc,
haveI := hc,
ext i,
exact (is_empty.false i).elim },
{ have hn : nonempty n := fintype.card_pos_iff.mp hc,
refine nonsing_inv_apply_not_is_unit _ _,
simp [hn] },
end
@[simp] lemma inv_one : (1 : matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 1 :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp)
lemma inv_smul (k : α) [invertible k] (h : is_unit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = ⅟k • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
lemma inv_smul' (k : units α) (h : is_unit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = k⁻¹ • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
lemma inv_adjugate (A : matrix n n α) (h : is_unit A.det) :
(adjugate A)⁻¹ = h.unit⁻¹ • A :=
begin
refine inv_eq_left_inv _,
rw [smul_mul, mul_adjugate, units.smul_def, smul_smul, h.coe_inv_mul, one_smul]
end
@[simp] lemma inv_inv_inv (A : matrix n n α) : A⁻¹⁻¹⁻¹ = A⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases h : is_unit A.det,
{ rw [nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv _ h] },
{ simp [nonsing_inv_apply_not_is_unit _ h] }
end
lemma _root_.ring_hom.map_adjugate {R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S)
(M : matrix n n R) : f.map_matrix M.adjugate = matrix.adjugate (f.map_matrix M) :=
begin
ext i k,
have : pi.single i (1 : S) = f ∘ pi.single i 1,
{ rw ←f.map_one,
exact pi.single_op (λ i, f) (λ i, f.map_zero) i (1 : R) },
rw [adjugate_apply, ring_hom.map_matrix_apply, map_apply, ring_hom.map_matrix_apply,
this, ←map_update_row, ←ring_hom.map_matrix_apply, ←ring_hom.map_det, ←adjugate_apply]
end
lemma adjugate_conj_transpose [star_ring α] (A : matrix n n α) : A.adjugateᴴ = adjugate (Aᴴ) :=
begin
dsimp only [conj_transpose],
have : Aᵀ.adjugate.map star = adjugate (Aᵀ.map star) :=
((star_ring_aut : α ≃+* α).to_ring_hom.map_adjugate Aᵀ),
rw [A.adjugate_transpose, this],
end
lemma is_regular_of_is_left_regular_det {A : matrix n n α} (hA : is_left_regular A.det) :
is_regular A :=
begin
split,
{ intros B C h,
refine hA.matrix _,
rw [←matrix.one_mul B, ←matrix.one_mul C, ←matrix.smul_mul, ←matrix.smul_mul, ←adjugate_mul,
matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.mul_assoc, ←mul_eq_mul A, h, mul_eq_mul] },
{ intros B C h,
simp only [mul_eq_mul] at h,
refine hA.matrix _,
rw [←matrix.mul_one B, ←matrix.mul_one C, ←matrix.mul_smul, ←matrix.mul_smul, ←mul_adjugate,
←matrix.mul_assoc, ←matrix.mul_assoc, h] }
end
lemma adjugate_mul_distrib_aux (A B : matrix n n α)
(hA : is_left_regular A.det)
(hB : is_left_regular B.det) :
adjugate (A ⬝ B) = adjugate B ⬝ adjugate A :=
begin
have hAB : is_left_regular (A ⬝ B).det,
{ rw [det_mul],
exact hA.mul hB },
refine (is_regular_of_is_left_regular_det hAB).left _,
rw [mul_eq_mul, mul_adjugate, mul_eq_mul, matrix.mul_assoc, ←matrix.mul_assoc B, mul_adjugate,
smul_mul, matrix.one_mul, mul_smul, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, mul_comm, ←det_mul]
end
/--
Proof follows from "The trace Cayley-Hamilton theorem" by Darij Grinberg, Section 5.3
-/
lemma adjugate_mul_distrib (A B : matrix n n α) : adjugate (A ⬝ B) = adjugate B ⬝ adjugate A :=
begin
casesI subsingleton_or_nontrivial α,
{ simp },
let g : matrix n n α → matrix n n (polynomial α) :=
λ M, M.map polynomial.C + (polynomial.X : polynomial α) • 1,
let f' : matrix n n (polynomial α) →+* matrix n n α := (polynomial.eval_ring_hom 0).map_matrix,
have f'_inv : ∀ M, f' (g M) = M,
{ intro,
ext,
simp [f', g], },
have f'_adj : ∀ (M : matrix n n α), f' (adjugate (g M)) = adjugate M,
{ intro,
rw [ring_hom.map_adjugate, f'_inv] },
have f'_g_mul : ∀ (M N : matrix n n α), f' (g M ⬝ g N) = M ⬝ N,
{ intros,
rw [←mul_eq_mul, ring_hom.map_mul, f'_inv, f'_inv, mul_eq_mul] },
have hu : ∀ (M : matrix n n α), is_regular (g M).det,
{ intros M,
refine polynomial.monic.is_regular _,
simp only [g, polynomial.monic.def, ←polynomial.leading_coeff_det_X_one_add_C M, add_comm] },
rw [←f'_adj, ←f'_adj, ←f'_adj, ←mul_eq_mul (f' (adjugate (g B))), ←f'.map_mul, mul_eq_mul,
←adjugate_mul_distrib_aux _ _ (hu A).left (hu B).left, ring_hom.map_adjugate,
ring_hom.map_adjugate, f'_inv, f'_g_mul]
end
lemma mul_inv_rev (A B : matrix n n α) : (A ⬝ B)⁻¹ = B⁻¹ ⬝ A⁻¹ :=
begin
simp only [inv_def],
rw [matrix.smul_mul, matrix.mul_smul, smul_smul, det_mul, adjugate_mul_distrib,
ring.mul_inverse_rev],
end
@[simp] lemma adjugate_pow (A : matrix n n α) (k : ℕ) :
adjugate (A ^ k) = (adjugate A) ^ k :=
begin
induction k with k IH,
{ simp },
{ rw [pow_succ', mul_eq_mul, adjugate_mul_distrib, IH, ←mul_eq_mul, pow_succ] }
end
end inv
/-- One form of Cramer's rule -/
@[simp] lemma det_smul_inv_mul_vec_eq_cramer (A : matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : is_unit A.det) :
A.det • A⁻¹.mul_vec b = cramer A b :=
begin
rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mul_vec, A.nonsing_inv_apply h, ← smul_mul_vec_assoc,
smul_smul, h.mul_coe_inv, one_smul]
end
/-- A stronger form of **Cramer's rule** that allows us to solve some instances of `A ⬝ x = b` even
if the determinant is not a unit. A sufficient (but still not necessary) condition is that `A.det`
divides `b`. -/
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_cramer (A : matrix n n α) (b : n → α) :
A.mul_vec (cramer A b) = A.det • b :=
by rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mul_vec, mul_vec_mul_vec, mul_adjugate, smul_mul_vec_assoc, one_mul_vec]
section nondegenerate
variables {m R A : Type*} [fintype m] [comm_ring R]
/-- A matrix `M` is nondegenerate if for all `v ≠ 0`, there is a `w ≠ 0` with `w ⬝ M ⬝ v ≠ 0`. -/
def nondegenerate (M : matrix m m R) :=
∀ v, (∀ w, matrix.dot_product v (mul_vec M w) = 0) → v = 0
/-- If `M` is nondegenerate and `w ⬝ M ⬝ v = 0` for all `w`, then `v = 0`. -/
lemma nondegenerate.eq_zero_of_ortho {M : matrix m m R} (hM : nondegenerate M)
{v : m → R} (hv : ∀ w, matrix.dot_product v (mul_vec M w) = 0) : v = 0 :=
hM v hv
/-- If `M` is nondegenerate and `v ≠ 0`, then there is some `w` such that `w ⬝ M ⬝ v ≠ 0`. -/
lemma nondegenerate.exists_not_ortho_of_ne_zero {M : matrix m m R} (hM : nondegenerate M)
{v : m → R} (hv : v ≠ 0) : ∃ w, matrix.dot_product v (mul_vec M w) ≠ 0 :=
not_forall.mp (mt hM.eq_zero_of_ortho hv)
variables [comm_ring A] [is_domain A]
/-- If `M` has a nonzero determinant, then `M` as a bilinear form on `n → A` is nondegenerate.
See also `bilin_form.nondegenerate_of_det_ne_zero'` and `bilin_form.nondegenerate_of_det_ne_zero`.
-/
theorem nondegenerate_of_det_ne_zero {M : matrix n n A} (hM : M.det ≠ 0) :
nondegenerate M :=
begin
intros v hv,
ext i,
specialize hv (M.cramer (pi.single i 1)),
refine (mul_eq_zero.mp _).resolve_right hM,
convert hv,
simp only [mul_vec_cramer M (pi.single i 1), dot_product, pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul],
rw [finset.sum_eq_single i, pi.single_eq_same, mul_one],
{ intros j _ hj, simp [hj] },
{ intros, have := finset.mem_univ i, contradiction }
end
theorem eq_zero_of_vec_mul_eq_zero {M : matrix n n A} (hM : M.det ≠ 0) {v : n → A}
(hv : M.vec_mul v = 0) : v = 0 :=
(nondegenerate_of_det_ne_zero hM).eq_zero_of_ortho
(λ w, by rw [dot_product_mul_vec, hv, zero_dot_product])
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_vec_eq_zero {M : matrix n n A} (hM : M.det ≠ 0) {v : n → A}
(hv : M.mul_vec v = 0) :
v = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_vec_mul_eq_zero (by rwa det_transpose) ((vec_mul_transpose M v).trans hv)
end nondegenerate
end matrix
|
ce43c75ed9aaca688b0f173644a8fefd1d543aa9 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Lean/Util/FindMVar.lean | 4d18130a1f78ab74a27aa0a1601bc525140ff928 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,046 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Expr
namespace Lean
namespace FindMVar
abbrev Visitor := Option MVarId → Option MVarId
mutual
partial def visit (p : MVarId → Bool) (e : Expr) : Visitor := fun s =>
if s.isSome || !e.hasMVar then s else main p e s
@[specialize]
partial def main (p : MVarId → Bool) : Expr → Visitor
| Expr.proj _ _ e _ => visit p e
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ => visit p b ∘ visit p d
| Expr.lam _ d b _ => visit p b ∘ visit p d
| Expr.letE _ t v b _ => visit p b ∘ visit p v ∘ visit p t
| Expr.app f a _ => visit p a ∘ visit p f
| Expr.mdata _ b _ => visit p b
| Expr.mvar mvarId _ => fun s => if s.isNone && p mvarId then some mvarId else s
| _ => id
end
end FindMVar
@[inline] def Expr.findMVar? (e : Expr) (p : MVarId → Bool) : Option MVarId :=
FindMVar.main p e none
end Lean
|
35457238d83b048d9fe67f34a270e6596756a1d8 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/algebra/continued_fractions/computation/terminates_iff_rat.lean | dddf5af9ecba89477720c3e7adaa1b5b2df3f07f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,232 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import algebra.continued_fractions.computation.approximations
import algebra.continued_fractions.computation.correctness_terminating
import data.rat
/-!
# Termination of Continued Fraction Computations (`gcf.of`)
## Summary
We show that the continued fraction for a value `v`, as defined in
`algebra.continued_fractions.computation.basic`, terminates if and only if `v` corresponds to a
rational number, that is `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Main Theorems
- `generalized_continued_fraction.coe_of_rat` shows that
`generalized_continued_fraction.of v = generalized_continued_fraction.of q` for `v : α` given that
`↑v = q` and `q : ℚ`.
- `generalized_continued_fraction.terminates_iff_rat` shows that
`generalized_continued_fraction.of v` terminates if and only if `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Tags
rational, continued fraction, termination
-/
namespace generalized_continued_fraction
open generalized_continued_fraction (of)
variables {K : Type*} [linear_ordered_field K] [floor_ring K]
/-
We will have to constantly coerce along our structures in the following proofs using their provided
map functions.
-/
local attribute [simp] pair.map int_fract_pair.mapFr
section rat_of_terminates
/-!
### Terminating Continued Fractions Are Rational
We want to show that the computation of a continued fraction `generalized_continued_fraction.of v`
terminates if and only if `v ∈ ℚ`. In this section, we show the implication from left to right.
We first show that every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number `q` and then use the
finite correctness proof (`of_correctness_of_terminates`) of `generalized_continued_fraction.of` to
show that `v = ↑q`.
-/
variables (v : K) (n : ℕ)
lemma exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_conts_aux :
∃ (conts : pair ℚ),
(of v).continuants_aux n = (conts.map coe : pair K) :=
nat.strong_induction_on n
begin
clear n,
let g := of v,
assume n IH,
rcases n with _|_|n,
-- n = 0
{ suffices : ∃ (gp : pair ℚ), pair.mk (1 : K) 0 = gp.map coe, by simpa [continuants_aux],
use (pair.mk 1 0),
simp },
-- n = 1
{ suffices : ∃ (conts : pair ℚ), pair.mk g.h 1 = conts.map coe, by
simpa [continuants_aux],
use (pair.mk ⌊v⌋ 1),
simp },
-- 2 ≤ n
{ cases (IH (n + 1) $ lt_add_one (n + 1)) with pred_conts pred_conts_eq, -- invoke the IH
cases s_ppred_nth_eq : (g.s.nth n) with gp_n,
-- option.none
{ use pred_conts,
have : g.continuants_aux (n + 2) = g.continuants_aux (n + 1), from
continuants_aux_stable_of_terminated (n + 1).le_succ s_ppred_nth_eq,
simp only [this, pred_conts_eq] },
-- option.some
{ -- invoke the IH a second time
cases (IH n $ lt_of_le_of_lt (n.le_succ) $ lt_add_one $ n + 1)
with ppred_conts ppred_conts_eq,
obtain ⟨a_eq_one, z, b_eq_z⟩ : gp_n.a = 1 ∧ ∃ (z : ℤ), gp_n.b = (z : K), from
of_part_num_eq_one_and_exists_int_part_denom_eq s_ppred_nth_eq,
-- finally, unfold the recurrence to obtain the required rational value.
simp only [a_eq_one, b_eq_z,
(continuants_aux_recurrence s_ppred_nth_eq ppred_conts_eq pred_conts_eq)],
use (next_continuants 1 (z : ℚ) ppred_conts pred_conts),
cases ppred_conts, cases pred_conts,
simp [next_continuants, next_numerator, next_denominator] } }
end
lemma exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts :
∃ (conts : pair ℚ), (of v).continuants n = (conts.map coe : pair K) :=
by { rw [nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_cont_aux], exact (exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_conts_aux v $ n + 1) }
lemma exists_rat_eq_nth_numerator : ∃ (q : ℚ), (of v).numerators n = (q : K) :=
begin
rcases (exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n) with ⟨⟨a, _⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩,
use a,
simp [num_eq_conts_a, nth_cont_eq],
end
lemma exists_rat_eq_nth_denominator : ∃ (q : ℚ), (of v).denominators n = (q : K) :=
begin
rcases (exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n) with ⟨⟨_, b⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩,
use b,
simp [denom_eq_conts_b, nth_cont_eq]
end
/-- Every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number. -/
lemma exists_rat_eq_nth_convergent : ∃ (q : ℚ), (of v).convergents n = (q : K) :=
begin
rcases (exists_rat_eq_nth_numerator v n) with ⟨Aₙ, nth_num_eq⟩,
rcases (exists_rat_eq_nth_denominator v n) with ⟨Bₙ, nth_denom_eq⟩,
use (Aₙ / Bₙ),
simp [nth_num_eq, nth_denom_eq, convergent_eq_num_div_denom]
end
variable {v}
/-- Every terminating continued fraction corresponds to a rational number. -/
theorem exists_rat_eq_of_terminates
(terminates : (of v).terminates) :
∃ (q : ℚ), v = ↑q :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, v_eq_conv⟩ : ∃ n, v = (of v).convergents n, from
of_correctness_of_terminates terminates,
obtain ⟨q, conv_eq_q⟩ :
∃ (q : ℚ), (of v).convergents n = (↑q : K), from exists_rat_eq_nth_convergent v n,
have : v = (↑q : K), from eq.trans v_eq_conv conv_eq_q,
use [q, this]
end
end rat_of_terminates
section rat_translation
/-!
### Technical Translation Lemmas
Before we can show that the continued fraction of a rational number terminates, we have to prove
some technical translation lemmas. More precisely, in this section, we show that, given a rational
number `q : ℚ` and value `v : K` with `v = ↑q`, the continued fraction of `q` and `v` coincide.
In particular, we show that
```lean
(↑(generalized_continued_fraction.of q : generalized_continued_fraction ℚ)
: generalized_continued_fraction K)
= generalized_continued_fraction.of v`
```
in `generalized_continued_fraction.coe_of_rat`.
To do this, we proceed bottom-up, showing the correspondence between the basic functions involved in
the computation first and then lift the results step-by-step.
-/
/- The lifting works for arbitrary linear ordered fields with a floor function. -/
variables {v : K} {q : ℚ} (v_eq_q : v = (↑q : K)) (n : ℕ)
include v_eq_q
/-! First, we show the correspondence for the very basic functions in
`generalized_continued_fraction.int_fract_pair`. -/
namespace int_fract_pair
lemma coe_of_rat_eq :
((int_fract_pair.of q).mapFr coe : int_fract_pair K) = int_fract_pair.of v :=
by simp [int_fract_pair.of, v_eq_q]
lemma coe_stream_nth_rat_eq :
((int_fract_pair.stream q n).map (mapFr coe) : option $ int_fract_pair K)
= int_fract_pair.stream v n :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
case nat.zero : { simp [int_fract_pair.stream, (coe_of_rat_eq v_eq_q)] },
case nat.succ :
{ rw v_eq_q at IH,
cases stream_q_nth_eq : (int_fract_pair.stream q n) with ifp_n,
case option.none : { simp [int_fract_pair.stream, IH.symm, v_eq_q, stream_q_nth_eq] },
case option.some :
{ cases ifp_n with b fr,
cases decidable.em (fr = 0) with fr_zero fr_ne_zero,
{ simp [int_fract_pair.stream, IH.symm, v_eq_q, stream_q_nth_eq, fr_zero] },
{ replace IH : some (int_fract_pair.mk b ↑fr) = int_fract_pair.stream ↑q n, by
rwa [stream_q_nth_eq] at IH,
have : (fr : K)⁻¹ = ((fr⁻¹ : ℚ) : K), by norm_cast,
have coe_of_fr := (coe_of_rat_eq this),
simp [int_fract_pair.stream, IH.symm, v_eq_q, stream_q_nth_eq, fr_ne_zero],
unfold_coes,
simpa [coe_of_fr] } } }
end
lemma coe_stream_rat_eq :
((int_fract_pair.stream q).map (option.map (mapFr coe)) : stream $ option $ int_fract_pair K) =
int_fract_pair.stream v :=
by { funext n, exact (int_fract_pair.coe_stream_nth_rat_eq v_eq_q n) }
end int_fract_pair
/-! Now we lift the coercion results to the continued fraction computation. -/
lemma coe_of_h_rat_eq : (↑((of q).h : ℚ) : K) = (of v).h :=
begin
unfold of int_fract_pair.seq1,
rw ←(int_fract_pair.coe_of_rat_eq v_eq_q),
simp
end
lemma coe_of_s_nth_rat_eq :
(((of q).s.nth n).map (pair.map coe) : option $ pair K) = (of v).s.nth n :=
begin
simp only [of, int_fract_pair.seq1, seq.map_nth, seq.nth_tail],
simp only [seq.nth],
rw [←(int_fract_pair.coe_stream_rat_eq v_eq_q)],
rcases succ_nth_stream_eq : (int_fract_pair.stream q (n + 1)) with _ | ⟨_, _⟩;
simp [stream.map, stream.nth, succ_nth_stream_eq]
end
lemma coe_of_s_rat_eq : (((of q).s).map (pair.map coe) : seq $ pair K) = (of v).s :=
by { ext n, rw ←(coe_of_s_nth_rat_eq v_eq_q), refl }
/-- Given `(v : K), (q : ℚ), and v = q`, we have that `gcf.of q = gcf.of v` -/
lemma coe_of_rat_eq :
(⟨(of q).h, (of q).s.map (pair.map coe)⟩ : generalized_continued_fraction K) = of v :=
begin
cases gcf_v_eq : (of v) with h s, subst v,
obtain rfl : ↑⌊↑q⌋ = h, by { injection gcf_v_eq },
simp [coe_of_h_rat_eq rfl, coe_of_s_rat_eq rfl, gcf_v_eq]
end
lemma of_terminates_iff_of_rat_terminates {v : K} {q : ℚ} (v_eq_q : v = (q : K)) :
(of v).terminates ↔ (of q).terminates :=
begin
split;
intro h;
cases h with n h;
use n;
simp only [seq.terminated_at, (coe_of_s_nth_rat_eq v_eq_q n).symm] at h ⊢;
cases ((of q).s.nth n);
trivial
end
end rat_translation
section terminates_of_rat
/-!
### Continued Fractions of Rationals Terminate
Finally, we show that the continued fraction of a rational number terminates.
The crucial insight is that, given any `q : ℚ` with `0 < q < 1`, the numerator of `int.fract q` is
smaller than the numerator of `q`. As the continued fraction computation recursively operates on
the fractional part of a value `v` and `0 ≤ int.fract v < 1`, we infer that the numerator of the
fractional part in the computation decreases by at least one in each step. As `0 ≤ int.fract v`,
this process must stop after finite number of steps, and the computation hence terminates.
-/
namespace int_fract_pair
variables {q : ℚ} {n : ℕ}
/--
Shows that for any `q : ℚ` with `0 < q < 1`, the numerator of the fractional part of
`int_fract_pair.of q⁻¹` is smaller than the numerator of `q`.
-/
lemma of_inv_fr_num_lt_num_of_pos (q_pos : 0 < q) :
(int_fract_pair.of q⁻¹).fr.num < q.num :=
rat.fract_inv_num_lt_num_of_pos q_pos
/-- Shows that the sequence of numerators of the fractional parts of the stream is strictly
antitone. -/
lemma stream_succ_nth_fr_num_lt_nth_fr_num_rat {ifp_n ifp_succ_n : int_fract_pair ℚ}
(stream_nth_eq : int_fract_pair.stream q n = some ifp_n)
(stream_succ_nth_eq : int_fract_pair.stream q (n + 1) = some ifp_succ_n) :
ifp_succ_n.fr.num < ifp_n.fr.num :=
begin
obtain ⟨ifp_n', stream_nth_eq', ifp_n_fract_ne_zero, int_fract_pair.of_eq_ifp_succ_n⟩ :
∃ ifp_n', int_fract_pair.stream q n = some ifp_n' ∧ ifp_n'.fr ≠ 0
∧ int_fract_pair.of ifp_n'.fr⁻¹ = ifp_succ_n, from
succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff.elim_left stream_succ_nth_eq,
have : ifp_n = ifp_n', by injection (eq.trans stream_nth_eq.symm stream_nth_eq'),
cases this,
rw [←int_fract_pair.of_eq_ifp_succ_n],
cases (nth_stream_fr_nonneg_lt_one stream_nth_eq) with zero_le_ifp_n_fract ifp_n_fract_lt_one,
have : 0 < ifp_n.fr, from (lt_of_le_of_ne zero_le_ifp_n_fract $ ifp_n_fract_ne_zero.symm),
exact (of_inv_fr_num_lt_num_of_pos this)
end
lemma stream_nth_fr_num_le_fr_num_sub_n_rat : ∀ {ifp_n : int_fract_pair ℚ},
int_fract_pair.stream q n = some ifp_n → ifp_n.fr.num ≤ (int_fract_pair.of q).fr.num - n :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
case nat.zero
{ assume ifp_zero stream_zero_eq,
have : int_fract_pair.of q = ifp_zero, by injection stream_zero_eq,
simp [le_refl, this.symm] },
case nat.succ
{ assume ifp_succ_n stream_succ_nth_eq,
suffices : ifp_succ_n.fr.num + 1 ≤ (int_fract_pair.of q).fr.num - n, by
{ rw [int.coe_nat_succ, sub_add_eq_sub_sub],
solve_by_elim [le_sub_right_of_add_le] },
rcases (succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff.elim_left stream_succ_nth_eq) with
⟨ifp_n, stream_nth_eq, -⟩,
have : ifp_succ_n.fr.num < ifp_n.fr.num, from
stream_succ_nth_fr_num_lt_nth_fr_num_rat stream_nth_eq stream_succ_nth_eq,
have : ifp_succ_n.fr.num + 1 ≤ ifp_n.fr.num, from int.add_one_le_of_lt this,
exact (le_trans this (IH stream_nth_eq)) }
end
lemma exists_nth_stream_eq_none_of_rat (q : ℚ) : ∃ (n : ℕ), int_fract_pair.stream q n = none :=
begin
let fract_q_num := (int.fract q).num, let n := fract_q_num.nat_abs + 1,
cases stream_nth_eq : (int_fract_pair.stream q n) with ifp,
{ use n, exact stream_nth_eq },
{ -- arrive at a contradiction since the numerator decreased num + 1 times but every fractional
-- value is nonnegative.
have ifp_fr_num_le_q_fr_num_sub_n : ifp.fr.num ≤ fract_q_num - n, from
stream_nth_fr_num_le_fr_num_sub_n_rat stream_nth_eq,
have : fract_q_num - n = -1, by
{ have : 0 ≤ fract_q_num, from rat.num_nonneg_iff_zero_le.elim_right (int.fract_nonneg q),
simp [(int.nat_abs_of_nonneg this), sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap, sub_right_comm] },
have : ifp.fr.num ≤ -1, by rwa this at ifp_fr_num_le_q_fr_num_sub_n,
have : 0 ≤ ifp.fr, from (nth_stream_fr_nonneg_lt_one stream_nth_eq).left,
have : 0 ≤ ifp.fr.num, from rat.num_nonneg_iff_zero_le.elim_right this,
linarith }
end
end int_fract_pair
/-- The continued fraction of a rational number terminates. -/
theorem terminates_of_rat (q : ℚ) : (of q).terminates :=
exists.elim (int_fract_pair.exists_nth_stream_eq_none_of_rat q)
( assume n stream_nth_eq_none,
exists.intro n
( have int_fract_pair.stream q (n + 1) = none, from
int_fract_pair.stream_is_seq q stream_nth_eq_none,
(of_terminated_at_n_iff_succ_nth_int_fract_pair_stream_eq_none.elim_right this) ) )
end terminates_of_rat
/--
The continued fraction `generalized_continued_fraction.of v` terminates if and only if `v ∈ ℚ`.
-/
theorem terminates_iff_rat (v : K) : (of v).terminates ↔ ∃ (q : ℚ), v = (q : K) :=
iff.intro
( assume terminates_v : (of v).terminates,
show ∃ (q : ℚ), v = (q : K), from exists_rat_eq_of_terminates terminates_v )
( assume exists_q_eq_v : ∃ (q : ℚ), v = (↑q : K),
exists.elim exists_q_eq_v
( assume q,
assume v_eq_q : v = ↑q,
have (of q).terminates, from terminates_of_rat q,
(of_terminates_iff_of_rat_terminates v_eq_q).elim_right this ) )
end generalized_continued_fraction
|
edc8064a9ba67bcee232627849385762037b3d68 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/group_with_zero/defs.lean | 2465879a2a70252a4004b1e4ad6e2d68a1ddfab8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,434 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import algebra.group.defs
import logic.nontrivial
/-!
# Typeclasses for groups with an adjoined zero element
This file provides just the typeclass definitions, and the projection lemmas that expose their
members.
## Main definitions
* `group_with_zero`
* `comm_group_with_zero`
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
universe u
-- We have to fix the universe of `G₀` here, since the default argument to
-- `group_with_zero.div'` cannot contain a universe metavariable.
variables {G₀ : Type u} {M₀ M₀' G₀' : Type*}
section
/-- Typeclass for expressing that a type `M₀` with multiplication and a zero satisfies
`0 * a = 0` and `a * 0 = 0` for all `a : M₀`. -/
@[protect_proj, ancestor has_mul has_zero]
class mul_zero_class (M₀ : Type*) extends has_mul M₀, has_zero M₀ :=
(zero_mul : ∀ a : M₀, 0 * a = 0)
(mul_zero : ∀ a : M₀, a * 0 = 0)
section mul_zero_class
variables [mul_zero_class M₀] {a b : M₀}
@[ematch, simp] lemma zero_mul (a : M₀) : 0 * a = 0 :=
mul_zero_class.zero_mul a
@[ematch, simp] lemma mul_zero (a : M₀) : a * 0 = 0 :=
mul_zero_class.mul_zero a
end mul_zero_class
/-- Predicate typeclass for expressing that `a * b = 0` implies `a = 0` or `b = 0`
for all `a` and `b` of type `G₀`. -/
class no_zero_divisors (M₀ : Type*) [has_mul M₀] [has_zero M₀] : Prop :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {a b : M₀}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0)
export no_zero_divisors (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero)
/-- A type `S₀` is a "semigroup with zero” if it is a semigroup with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
@[protect_proj] class semigroup_with_zero (S₀ : Type*) extends semigroup S₀, mul_zero_class S₀.
/- By defining this _after_ `semigroup_with_zero`, we ensure that searches for `mul_zero_class` find
this class first. -/
/-- A typeclass for non-associative monoids with zero elements. -/
@[protect_proj] class mul_zero_one_class (M₀ : Type*) extends mul_one_class M₀, mul_zero_class M₀.
/-- A type `M₀` is a “monoid with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
@[protect_proj] class monoid_with_zero (M₀ : Type*) extends monoid M₀, mul_zero_one_class M₀.
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance monoid_with_zero.to_semigroup_with_zero (M₀ : Type*) [monoid_with_zero M₀] :
semigroup_with_zero M₀ :=
{ ..‹monoid_with_zero M₀› }
/-- A type `M` is a `cancel_monoid_with_zero` if it is a monoid with zero element, `0` is left
and right absorbing, and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
@[protect_proj] class cancel_monoid_with_zero (M₀ : Type*) extends monoid_with_zero M₀ :=
(mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, a ≠ 0 → a * b = a * c → b = c)
(mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, b ≠ 0 → a * b = c * b → a = c)
section cancel_monoid_with_zero
variables [cancel_monoid_with_zero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
lemma mul_left_cancel' (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a * b = a * c) : b = c :=
cancel_monoid_with_zero.mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero ha h
lemma mul_right_cancel' (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c * b) : a = c :=
cancel_monoid_with_zero.mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero hb h
lemma mul_right_injective' (ha : a ≠ 0) : function.injective ((*) a) :=
λ b c, mul_left_cancel' ha
lemma mul_left_injective' (hb : b ≠ 0) : function.injective (λ a, a * b) :=
λ a c, mul_right_cancel' hb
end cancel_monoid_with_zero
/-- A type `M` is a commutative “monoid with zero” if it is a commutative monoid with zero
element, and `0` is left and right absorbing. -/
@[protect_proj]
class comm_monoid_with_zero (M₀ : Type*) extends comm_monoid M₀, monoid_with_zero M₀.
/-- A type `M` is a `comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero` if it is a commutative monoid with zero element,
`0` is left and right absorbing,
and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
@[protect_proj] class comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero (M₀ : Type*) extends
comm_monoid_with_zero M₀, cancel_monoid_with_zero M₀.
/-- A type `G₀` is a “group with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element (distinct from `1`)
such that every nonzero element is invertible.
The type is required to come with an “inverse” function, and the inverse of `0` must be `0`.
Examples include division rings and the ordered monoids that are the
target of valuations in general valuation theory.-/
class group_with_zero (G₀ : Type u) extends
monoid_with_zero G₀, div_inv_monoid G₀, nontrivial G₀ :=
(inv_zero : (0 : G₀)⁻¹ = 0)
(mul_inv_cancel : ∀ a:G₀, a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1)
section group_with_zero
variables [group_with_zero G₀]
@[simp] lemma inv_zero : (0 : G₀)⁻¹ = 0 :=
group_with_zero.inv_zero
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_cancel {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
group_with_zero.mul_inv_cancel a h
end group_with_zero
/-- A type `G₀` is a commutative “group with zero”
if it is a commutative monoid with zero element (distinct from `1`)
such that every nonzero element is invertible.
The type is required to come with an “inverse” function, and the inverse of `0` must be `0`. -/
class comm_group_with_zero (G₀ : Type*) extends comm_monoid_with_zero G₀, group_with_zero G₀.
end
|
a479406d02696cb40e7383d4e4ca277cb56aa91d | 3dc4623269159d02a444fe898d33e8c7e7e9461b | /.github/workflows/geo/src/pfin/default.lean | bbdf59fc03d21ad227a3a36125637f39ae044b93 | [] | no_license | Or7ando/lean | cc003e6c41048eae7c34aa6bada51c9e9add9e66 | d41169cf4e416a0d42092fb6bdc14131cee9dd15 | refs/heads/master | 1,650,600,589,722 | 1,587,262,906,000 | 1,587,262,906,000 | 255,387,160 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 52 | lean | import pfin.basic pfin.ops pfin.lemmas pfin.fintype
|
9e891b19cc2131b9c77afdc6ec05e0bc5c5b8672 | 82b86ba2ae0d5aed0f01f49c46db5afec0eb2bd7 | /stage0/src/Lean/Data/OpenDecl.lean | 6fef6f08a68e63612654c10ac053a4398b4efdd4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | banksonian/lean4 | 3a2e6b0f1eb63aa56ff95b8d07b2f851072d54dc | 78da6b3aa2840693eea354a41e89fc5b212a5011 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,703,624,165 | 1,605,123,551,000 | 1,605,123,551,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 758 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.Name
namespace Lean
inductive OpenDecl
| simple (ns : Name) (except : List Name)
| explicit (id : Name) (declName : Name)
namespace OpenDecl
instance : Inhabited OpenDecl := ⟨simple Name.anonymous []⟩
instance : ToString OpenDecl := ⟨fun decl =>
match decl with
| explicit id decl => toString id ++ " → " ++ toString decl
| simple ns ex => toString ns ++ (if ex == [] then "" else " hiding " ++ toString ex)⟩
end OpenDecl
def rootNamespace := `_root_
def removeRoot (n : Name) : Name :=
n.replacePrefix rootNamespace Name.anonymous
end Lean
|
8d4148192c7c80ff3987061e6d42c3d1864556b0 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/hashableBug.lean | 0e21932fc4556888967345217201eac18e110290 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 87 | lean | inductive Step (α : Type u) where
| impossible : α → Step α
deriving Hashable
|
1d6a73be99b195335c5905f1d194d1a36d2e529a | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/coe2.lean | 84c2e92ab2436b5a344e011ca11b21618a48f97f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 895 | lean | namespace hidden
set_option pp.coercions false
#check if tt then "a" else "b"
/- Remark: in the standard library nat_to_int and int_to_real are has_lift instances
instead of has_coe. -/
constant int : Type
constant real : Type
constant nat_to_int : has_coe nat int
constant int_to_real : has_coe int real
attribute [instance] nat_to_int int_to_real
constant sine : real → real
constants n m : nat
constants i j : int
constants x y : real
#check sine x
#check sine n
#check sine i
constant int_has_add : has_add int
constant real_has_add : has_add real
attribute [instance] int_has_add real_has_add
#check x + i
/- The following one does not work because the implicit argument ?A of add is bound to int
when x is processed. -/
#check i + x -- FAIL
/- The workaround is to use the explicit lift -/
#check ↑i + x
#check x + n
#check n + x -- FAIL
#check ↑n + x
end hidden
|
60cea66fa0cab941a0b818843230a345a95baa99 | 037dba89703a79cd4a4aec5e959818147f97635d | /src/2020/problem_sheets/Part_II_sheet1.lean | 72cffe0a58e5fe06448bef58c6063b721a7998c4 | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/M40001_lean | 3a6a09298da395ab51bc220a535035d45bbe919b | 62a76fa92654c855af2b2fc2bef8e60acd16ccec | refs/heads/master | 1,666,750,403,259 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 209,141,835 | 115 | 12 | null | 1,640,270,596,000 | 1,568,749,174,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 660 | lean | import tactic
variables (x y : ℕ)
open nat
theorem Q1a : x + y = y + x :=
begin
sorry
end
theorem Q1b : x + y = x → y = 0 :=
begin
sorry
end
theorem Q1c : x + y = 0 → x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
begin
sorry
end
theorem Q1d : x * y = y * x :=
begin
sorry
end
theorem Q2a : 1 * x = x ∧ x = x * 1 :=
begin
sorry
end
variable z : ℕ
theorem Q2b : (x + y) * z = x * z + y * z :=
begin
sorry
end
theorem Q2c : (x * y) * z = x * (y * z) :=
begin
sorry
end
-- Q3 def
def is_pred (x y : ℕ) := x.succ = y
theorem Q3a : ¬ ∃ x : ℕ, is_pred x 0 :=
begin
sorry
end
theorem Q3b : y ≠ 0 → ∃! x, is_pred x y :=
begin
sorry
end
|
17d9bd468a61f92bb3381b0acbb6d90dc70e2119 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /stage0/src/Init/Lean/Meta/Message.lean | 7cc26d0fa3d1ab805b81ac9b0fbf6f316cba21d6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,608 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Meta.Basic
namespace Lean
namespace Meta
namespace Exception
private def run? {α} (ctx : ExceptionContext) (x : MetaM α) : Option α :=
match x { lctx := ctx.lctx, currRecDepth := 0, maxRecDepth := getMaxRecDepth ctx.opts } { env := ctx.env, mctx := ctx.mctx, ngen := { namePrefix := `_meta_exception } } with
| EStateM.Result.ok a _ => some a
| EStateM.Result.error _ _ => none
private def inferType? (ctx : ExceptionContext) (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
run? ctx (inferType e)
private def inferDomain? (ctx : ExceptionContext) (f : Expr) : Option Expr :=
run? ctx $ do
fType ← inferType f;
fType ← whnf fType;
match fType with
| Expr.forallE _ d _ _ => pure d
| _ => throw $ Exception.other "unexpected"
private def whnf? (ctx : ExceptionContext) (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
run? ctx (whnf e)
def mkAppTypeMismatchMessage (f a : Expr) (ctx : ExceptionContext) : MessageData :=
mkCtx ctx $
let e := mkApp f a;
match inferType? ctx a, inferDomain? ctx f with
| some aType, some expectedType =>
"application type mismatch" ++ indentExpr e
++ Format.line ++ "argument" ++ indentExpr a
++ Format.line ++ "has type" ++ indentExpr aType
++ Format.line ++ "but is expected to have type" ++ indentExpr expectedType
| _, _ =>
"application type mismatch" ++ indentExpr e
def mkLetTypeMismatchMessage (fvarId : FVarId) (ctx : ExceptionContext) : MessageData :=
mkCtx ctx $
match ctx.lctx.find? fvarId with
| some (LocalDecl.ldecl _ n t v b) =>
match inferType? ctx v with
| some vType =>
"invalid let declaration, term" ++ indentExpr v
++ Format.line ++ "has type " ++ indentExpr vType
++ Format.line ++ "but is expected to have type" ++ indentExpr t
| none => "type mismatch at let declaration for " ++ n
| _ => unreachable!
/--
Convert to `MessageData` that is supposed to be displayed in user-friendly error messages. -/
def toMessageData : Exception → MessageData
| unknownConst c ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "unknown constant " ++ c
| unknownFVar fvarId ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "unknown free variable " ++ fvarId
| unknownExprMVar mvarId ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "unknown metavariable " ++ mvarId
| unknownLevelMVar mvarId ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "unknown universe level metavariable " ++ mvarId
| unexpectedBVar bvarIdx => "unexpected bound variable " ++ mkBVar bvarIdx
| functionExpected f a ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "function expected " ++ mkApp f a
| typeExpected t ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "type expected " ++ t
| incorrectNumOfLevels c lvls ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "incorrect number of universe levels " ++ mkConst c lvls
| invalidProjection s i e ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "invalid projection" ++ indentExpr (mkProj s i e)
| revertFailure xs decl ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "revert failure"
| readOnlyMVar mvarId ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "tried to update read only metavariable " ++ mkMVar mvarId
| isLevelDefEqStuck u v ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "stuck at universe level constraint " ++ u ++ " =?= " ++ v
| isExprDefEqStuck t s ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "stuck at constraint " ++ t ++ " =?= " ++ s
| letTypeMismatch fvarId ctx => mkLetTypeMismatchMessage fvarId ctx
| appTypeMismatch f a ctx => mkAppTypeMismatchMessage f a ctx
| notInstance i ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "not a type class instance " ++ i
| appBuilder op msg args ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "application builder failure " ++ op ++ " " ++ args ++ " " ++ msg
| synthInstance inst ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "failed to synthesize" ++ indentExpr inst
| tactic tacName mvarId msg ctx => mkCtx ctx $ "tactic '" ++ tacName ++ "' failed, " ++ msg ++ Format.line ++ MessageData.ofGoal mvarId
| kernel ex opts => ex.toMessageData opts
| bug _ _ => "internal bug" -- TODO improve
| other s => s
end Exception
instance MetaHasEval {α} [MetaHasEval α] : MetaHasEval (MetaM α) :=
⟨fun env opts x _ => do
match x { config := { opts := opts }, currRecDepth := 0, maxRecDepth := getMaxRecDepth opts } { env := env } with
| EStateM.Result.ok a s => do
s.traceState.traces.forM $ fun m => IO.println $ format m;
MetaHasEval.eval s.env opts a
| EStateM.Result.error err s => do
s.traceState.traces.forM $ fun m => IO.println $ format m;
throw (IO.userError (toString (format err.toMessageData)))⟩
end Meta
end Lean
|
8aed5134f84c770bb29afb3c4ca3a770ad4c63b5 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/ring_theory/ideal/over.lean | 016bad775a0082602137f5bb4cdd23dbfac523a8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,558 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Anne Baanen
-/
import ring_theory.algebraic
import ring_theory.localization
/-!
# Ideals over/under ideals
This file concerns ideals lying over other ideals.
Let `f : R →+* S` be a ring homomorphism (typically a ring extension), `I` an ideal of `R` and
`J` an ideal of `S`. We say `J` lies over `I` (and `I` under `J`) if `I` is the `f`-preimage of `J`.
This is expressed here by writing `I = J.comap f`.
## Implementation notes
The proofs of the `comap_ne_bot` and `comap_lt_comap` families use an approach
specific for their situation: we construct an element in `I.comap f` from the
coefficients of a minimal polynomial.
Once mathlib has more material on the localization at a prime ideal, the results
can be proven using more general going-up/going-down theory.
-/
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
namespace ideal
open polynomial
open submodule
section comm_ring
variables {S : Type*} [comm_ring S] {f : R →+* S} {I J : ideal S}
lemma coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem_of_eval_mem {r : S} (hr : r ∈ I) {p : polynomial R}
(hp : p.eval₂ f r ∈ I) : p.coeff 0 ∈ I.comap f :=
begin
rw [←p.div_X_mul_X_add, eval₂_add, eval₂_C, eval₂_mul, eval₂_X] at hp,
refine mem_comap.mpr ((I.add_mem_iff_right _).mp hp),
exact I.mul_mem_left _ hr
end
lemma coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem {r : S} (hr : r ∈ I) {p : polynomial R}
(hp : p.eval₂ f r = 0) : p.coeff 0 ∈ I.comap f :=
coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem_of_eval_mem hr (hp.symm ▸ I.zero_mem)
lemma exists_coeff_ne_zero_mem_comap_of_non_zero_divisor_root_mem {r : S}
(r_non_zero_divisor : ∀ {x}, x * r = 0 → x = 0) (hr : r ∈ I)
{p : polynomial R} : ∀ (p_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp : p.eval₂ f r = 0),
∃ i, p.coeff i ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff i ∈ I.comap f :=
begin
refine p.rec_on_horner _ _ _,
{ intro h, contradiction },
{ intros p a coeff_eq_zero a_ne_zero ih p_ne_zero hp,
refine ⟨0, _, coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem hr hp⟩,
simp [coeff_eq_zero, a_ne_zero] },
{ intros p p_nonzero ih mul_nonzero hp,
rw [eval₂_mul, eval₂_X] at hp,
obtain ⟨i, hi, mem⟩ := ih p_nonzero (r_non_zero_divisor hp),
refine ⟨i + 1, _, _⟩; simp [hi, mem] }
end
/-- Let `P` be an ideal in `R[x]`. The map
`R[x]/P → (R / (P ∩ R))[x] / (P / (P ∩ R))`
is injective.
-/
lemma injective_quotient_le_comap_map (P : ideal (polynomial R)) :
function.injective ((map (map_ring_hom (quotient.mk (P.comap C))) P).quotient_map
(map_ring_hom (quotient.mk (P.comap C))) le_comap_map) :=
begin
refine quotient_map_injective' (le_of_eq _),
rw comap_map_of_surjective
(map_ring_hom (quotient.mk (P.comap C))) (map_surjective _ quotient.mk_surjective),
refine le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl _) (le_sup_left_of_le le_rfl),
refine λ p hp, polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal P p (λ n, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mp _),
simpa only [coeff_map, coe_map_ring_hom] using ext_iff.mp (ideal.mem_bot.mp (mem_comap.mp hp)) n,
end
/--
The identity in this lemma asserts that the "obvious" square
```
R → (R / (P ∩ R))
↓ ↓
R[x] / P → (R / (P ∩ R))[x] / (P / (P ∩ R))
```
commutes. It is used, for instance, in the proof of `quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson`,
in the file `ring_theory/jacobson`.
-/
lemma quotient_mk_maps_eq (P : ideal (polynomial R)) :
((quotient.mk (map (map_ring_hom (quotient.mk (P.comap C))) P)).comp C).comp
(quotient.mk (P.comap C)) =
((map (map_ring_hom (quotient.mk (P.comap C))) P).quotient_map
(map_ring_hom (quotient.mk (P.comap C))) le_comap_map).comp ((quotient.mk P).comp C) :=
begin
refine ring_hom.ext (λ x, _),
repeat { rw [ring_hom.coe_comp, function.comp_app] },
rw [quotient_map_mk, coe_map_ring_hom, map_C],
end
/--
This technical lemma asserts the existence of a polynomial `p` in an ideal `P ⊂ R[x]`
that is non-zero in the quotient `R / (P ∩ R) [x]`. The assumptions are equivalent to
`P ≠ 0` and `P ∩ R = (0)`.
-/
lemma exists_nonzero_mem_of_ne_bot {P : ideal (polynomial R)}
(Pb : P ≠ ⊥) (hP : ∀ (x : R), C x ∈ P → x = 0) :
∃ p : polynomial R, p ∈ P ∧ (polynomial.map (quotient.mk (P.comap C)) p) ≠ 0 :=
begin
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr Pb),
refine ⟨m, submodule.coe_mem m, λ pp0, hm (submodule.coe_eq_zero.mp _)⟩,
refine (is_add_group_hom.injective_iff (polynomial.map (quotient.mk (P.comap C)))).mp _ _ pp0,
refine map_injective _ ((quotient.mk (P.comap C)).injective_iff_ker_eq_bot.mpr _),
rw [mk_ker],
exact (submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mpr (λ x hx, hP x (mem_comap.mp hx)),
end
end comm_ring
section integral_domain
variables {S : Type*} [integral_domain S] {f : R →+* S} {I J : ideal S}
lemma exists_coeff_ne_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem {r : S} (r_ne_zero : r ≠ 0) (hr : r ∈ I)
{p : polynomial R} : ∀ (p_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp : p.eval₂ f r = 0),
∃ i, p.coeff i ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff i ∈ I.comap f :=
exists_coeff_ne_zero_mem_comap_of_non_zero_divisor_root_mem
(λ _ h, or.resolve_right (mul_eq_zero.mp h) r_ne_zero) hr
lemma exists_coeff_mem_comap_sdiff_comap_of_root_mem_sdiff
[is_prime I] (hIJ : I ≤ J) {r : S} (hr : r ∈ (J : set S) \ I)
{p : polynomial R} (p_ne_zero : p.map (quotient.mk (I.comap f)) ≠ 0) (hpI : p.eval₂ f r ∈ I) :
∃ i, p.coeff i ∈ (J.comap f : set R) \ (I.comap f) :=
begin
obtain ⟨hrJ, hrI⟩ := hr,
have rbar_ne_zero : quotient.mk I r ≠ 0 := mt (quotient.mk_eq_zero I).mp hrI,
have rbar_mem_J : quotient.mk I r ∈ J.map (quotient.mk I) := mem_map_of_mem hrJ,
have quotient_f : ∀ x ∈ I.comap f, (quotient.mk I).comp f x = 0,
{ simp [quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] },
have rbar_root : (p.map (quotient.mk (I.comap f))).eval₂
(quotient.lift (I.comap f) _ quotient_f)
(quotient.mk I r) = 0,
{ convert quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr hpI,
exact trans (eval₂_map _ _ _) (hom_eval₂ p f (quotient.mk I) r).symm },
obtain ⟨i, ne_zero, mem⟩ :=
exists_coeff_ne_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem rbar_ne_zero rbar_mem_J p_ne_zero rbar_root,
rw coeff_map at ne_zero mem,
refine ⟨i, (mem_quotient_iff_mem hIJ).mp _, mt _ ne_zero⟩,
{ simpa using mem },
simp [quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem],
end
lemma comap_ne_bot_of_root_mem {r : S} (r_ne_zero : r ≠ 0) (hr : r ∈ I)
{p : polynomial R} (p_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp : p.eval₂ f r = 0) :
I.comap f ≠ ⊥ :=
λ h, let ⟨i, hi, mem⟩ := exists_coeff_ne_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem r_ne_zero hr p_ne_zero hp in
absurd (mem_bot.mp (eq_bot_iff.mp h mem)) hi
lemma comap_lt_comap_of_root_mem_sdiff [I.is_prime] (hIJ : I ≤ J)
{r : S} (hr : r ∈ (J : set S) \ I)
{p : polynomial R} (p_ne_zero : p.map (quotient.mk (I.comap f)) ≠ 0) (hp : p.eval₂ f r ∈ I) :
I.comap f < J.comap f :=
let ⟨i, hJ, hI⟩ := exists_coeff_mem_comap_sdiff_comap_of_root_mem_sdiff hIJ hr p_ne_zero hp
in lt_iff_le_and_exists.mpr ⟨comap_mono hIJ, p.coeff i, hJ, hI⟩
variables [algebra R S]
lemma comap_ne_bot_of_algebraic_mem {x : S}
(x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (x_mem : x ∈ I) (hx : is_algebraic R x) : I.comap (algebra_map R S) ≠ ⊥ :=
let ⟨p, p_ne_zero, hp⟩ := hx
in comap_ne_bot_of_root_mem x_ne_zero x_mem p_ne_zero hp
lemma comap_ne_bot_of_integral_mem [nontrivial R] {x : S}
(x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (x_mem : x ∈ I) (hx : is_integral R x) : I.comap (algebra_map R S) ≠ ⊥ :=
comap_ne_bot_of_algebraic_mem x_ne_zero x_mem (hx.is_algebraic R)
lemma eq_bot_of_comap_eq_bot [nontrivial R] (hRS : algebra.is_integral R S)
(hI : I.comap (algebra_map R S) = ⊥) : I = ⊥ :=
begin
refine eq_bot_iff.2 (λ x hx, _),
by_cases hx0 : x = 0,
{ exact hx0.symm ▸ ideal.zero_mem ⊥ },
{ exact absurd hI (comap_ne_bot_of_integral_mem hx0 hx (hRS x)) }
end
lemma mem_of_one_mem (h : (1 : S) ∈ I) (x) : x ∈ I :=
(I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr h).symm ▸ mem_top
lemma comap_lt_comap_of_integral_mem_sdiff [hI : I.is_prime] (hIJ : I ≤ J)
{x : S} (mem : x ∈ (J : set S) \ I) (integral : is_integral R x) :
I.comap (algebra_map R S) < J.comap (algebra_map _ _) :=
begin
obtain ⟨p, p_monic, hpx⟩ := integral,
refine comap_lt_comap_of_root_mem_sdiff hIJ mem _ _,
swap,
{ apply map_monic_ne_zero p_monic,
apply quotient.nontrivial,
apply mt comap_eq_top_iff.mp,
apply hI.1 },
convert I.zero_mem
end
lemma is_maximal_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal_comap
(hRS : algebra.is_integral R S) (I : ideal S) [I.is_prime]
(hI : is_maximal (I.comap (algebra_map R S))) : is_maximal I :=
⟨⟨mt comap_eq_top_iff.mpr hI.1.1,
λ J I_lt_J, let ⟨I_le_J, x, hxJ, hxI⟩ := lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp I_lt_J in
comap_eq_top_iff.1 $ hI.1.2 _ (comap_lt_comap_of_integral_mem_sdiff I_le_J ⟨hxJ, hxI⟩ (hRS x))⟩⟩
lemma is_maximal_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal_comap' {R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain S]
(f : R →+* S) (hf : f.is_integral) (I : ideal S) [hI' : I.is_prime]
(hI : is_maximal (I.comap f)) : is_maximal I :=
@is_maximal_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal_comap R _ S _ f.to_algebra hf I hI' hI
lemma is_maximal_comap_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal (hRS : algebra.is_integral R S)
(I : ideal S) [hI : I.is_maximal] : is_maximal (I.comap (algebra_map R S)) :=
begin
refine quotient.maximal_of_is_field _ _,
haveI : is_prime (I.comap (algebra_map R S)) := comap_is_prime _ _,
exact is_field_of_is_integral_of_is_field (is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral hRS)
algebra_map_quotient_injective (by rwa ← quotient.maximal_ideal_iff_is_field_quotient),
end
lemma is_maximal_comap_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal' {R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain S]
(f : R →+* S) (hf : f.is_integral) (I : ideal S) (hI : I.is_maximal) : is_maximal (I.comap f) :=
@is_maximal_comap_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal R _ S _ f.to_algebra hf I hI
lemma integral_closure.comap_ne_bot [nontrivial R] {I : ideal (integral_closure R S)}
(I_ne_bot : I ≠ ⊥) : I.comap (algebra_map R (integral_closure R S)) ≠ ⊥ :=
let ⟨x, x_mem, x_ne_zero⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot in
comap_ne_bot_of_integral_mem x_ne_zero x_mem (integral_closure.is_integral x)
lemma integral_closure.eq_bot_of_comap_eq_bot [nontrivial R] {I : ideal (integral_closure R S)} :
I.comap (algebra_map R (integral_closure R S)) = ⊥ → I = ⊥ :=
imp_of_not_imp_not _ _ integral_closure.comap_ne_bot
lemma integral_closure.comap_lt_comap {I J : ideal (integral_closure R S)} [I.is_prime]
(I_lt_J : I < J) :
I.comap (algebra_map R (integral_closure R S)) < J.comap (algebra_map _ _) :=
let ⟨I_le_J, x, hxJ, hxI⟩ := lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp I_lt_J in
comap_lt_comap_of_integral_mem_sdiff I_le_J ⟨hxJ, hxI⟩ (integral_closure.is_integral x)
lemma integral_closure.is_maximal_of_is_maximal_comap
(I : ideal (integral_closure R S)) [I.is_prime]
(hI : is_maximal (I.comap (algebra_map R (integral_closure R S)))) : is_maximal I :=
is_maximal_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal_comap (λ x, integral_closure.is_integral x) I hI
/-- `comap (algebra_map R S)` is a surjection from the prime spec of `R` to prime spec of `S`.
`hP : (algebra_map R S).ker ≤ P` is a slight generalization of the extension being injective -/
lemma exists_ideal_over_prime_of_is_integral' (H : algebra.is_integral R S)
(P : ideal R) [is_prime P] (hP : (algebra_map R S).ker ≤ P) :
∃ (Q : ideal S), is_prime Q ∧ Q.comap (algebra_map R S) = P :=
begin
have hP0 : (0 : S) ∉ algebra.algebra_map_submonoid S P.prime_compl,
{ rintro ⟨x, ⟨hx, x0⟩⟩,
exact absurd (hP x0) hx },
let Rₚ := localization P.prime_compl,
let f := localization.of P.prime_compl,
let Sₚ := localization (algebra.algebra_map_submonoid S P.prime_compl),
let g := localization.of (algebra.algebra_map_submonoid S P.prime_compl),
letI : integral_domain (localization (algebra.algebra_map_submonoid S P.prime_compl)) :=
localization_map.integral_domain_localization (le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain hP0),
obtain ⟨Qₚ : ideal Sₚ, Qₚ_maximal⟩ := exists_maximal Sₚ,
haveI Qₚ_max : is_maximal (comap _ Qₚ) := @is_maximal_comap_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal Rₚ _ Sₚ _
(localization_algebra P.prime_compl f g)
(is_integral_localization f g H) _ Qₚ_maximal,
refine ⟨comap g.to_map Qₚ, ⟨comap_is_prime g.to_map Qₚ, _⟩⟩,
convert localization.at_prime.comap_maximal_ideal,
rw [comap_comap, ← local_ring.eq_maximal_ideal Qₚ_max, ← f.map_comp _],
refl
end
/-- More general going-up theorem than `exists_ideal_over_prime_of_is_integral'`.
TODO: Version of going-up theorem with arbitrary length chains (by induction on this)?
Not sure how best to write an ascending chain in Lean -/
theorem exists_ideal_over_prime_of_is_integral (H : algebra.is_integral R S)
(P : ideal R) [is_prime P] (I : ideal S) [is_prime I] (hIP : I.comap (algebra_map R S) ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, is_prime Q ∧ Q.comap (algebra_map R S) = P :=
begin
obtain ⟨Q' : ideal I.quotient, ⟨Q'_prime, hQ'⟩⟩ := @exists_ideal_over_prime_of_is_integral'
(I.comap (algebra_map R S)).quotient _ I.quotient _
ideal.quotient_algebra
(is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral H)
(map (quotient.mk (I.comap (algebra_map R S))) P)
(map_is_prime_of_surjective quotient.mk_surjective (by simp [hIP]))
(le_trans
(le_of_eq ((ring_hom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot _).1 algebra_map_quotient_injective))
bot_le),
haveI := Q'_prime,
refine ⟨Q'.comap _, le_trans (le_of_eq mk_ker.symm) (ker_le_comap _), ⟨comap_is_prime _ Q', _⟩⟩,
rw comap_comap,
refine trans _ (trans (congr_arg (comap (quotient.mk (comap (algebra_map R S) I))) hQ') _),
{ simpa [comap_comap] },
{ refine trans (comap_map_of_surjective _ quotient.mk_surjective _) (sup_eq_left.2 _),
simpa [← ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot] using hIP},
end
/-- `comap (algebra_map R S)` is a surjection from the max spec of `S` to max spec of `R`.
`hP : (algebra_map R S).ker ≤ P` is a slight generalization of the extension being injective -/
lemma exists_ideal_over_maximal_of_is_integral (H : algebra.is_integral R S)
(P : ideal R) [P_max : is_maximal P] (hP : (algebra_map R S).ker ≤ P) :
∃ (Q : ideal S), is_maximal Q ∧ Q.comap (algebra_map R S) = P :=
begin
obtain ⟨Q, ⟨Q_prime, hQ⟩⟩ := exists_ideal_over_prime_of_is_integral' H P hP,
haveI : Q.is_prime := Q_prime,
exact ⟨Q, is_maximal_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal_comap H _ (hQ.symm ▸ P_max), hQ⟩,
end
end integral_domain
end ideal
|
797251f6e8b8cc4b8d4f12d542eec8561e240355 | 22e97a5d648fc451e25a06c668dc03ac7ed7bc25 | /test/library_search/basic.lean | 0e952cd412ea14b23b530ac2b2491115c06223f1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | keeferrowan/mathlib | f2818da875dbc7780830d09bd4c526b0764a4e50 | aad2dfc40e8e6a7e258287a7c1580318e865817e | refs/heads/master | 1,661,736,426,952 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 266,892,663 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,445,835,000 | 1,590,445,835,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,654 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.nat.basic
/- Turn off trace messages so they don't pollute the test build: -/
set_option trace.silence_library_search true
/- For debugging purposes, we can display the list of lemmas: -/
-- set_option trace.suggest true
namespace test.library_search
-- Check that `library_search` fails if there are no goals.
example : true :=
begin
trivial,
success_if_fail { library_search },
end
-- Verify that `library_search` solves goals via `solve_by_elim` when the library isn't
-- even needed.
example (P : Prop) (p : P) : P :=
by library_search
example (P : Prop) (p : P) (np : ¬P) : false :=
by library_search
example (X : Type) (P : Prop) (x : X) (h : Π x : X, x = x → P) : P :=
by library_search
def lt_one (n : ℕ) := n < 1
lemma zero_lt_one (n : ℕ) (h : n = 0) : lt_one n := by subst h; dsimp [lt_one]; simp
-- Verify that calls to solve_by_elim to discharge subgoals use `rfl`
example : lt_one 0 :=
by library_search
example (α : Prop) : α → α :=
by library_search -- says: `exact id`
example (p : Prop) [decidable p] : (¬¬p) → p :=
by library_search -- says: `exact not_not.mp`
example (a b : Prop) (h : a ∧ b) : a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact h.left`
example (P Q : Prop) [decidable P] [decidable Q]: (¬ Q → ¬ P) → (P → Q) :=
by library_search -- says: `exact not_imp_not.mp`
example (a b : ℕ) : a + b = b + a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_comm a b`
example {a b : ℕ} : a ≤ a + b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.le.intro rfl`
example (n m k : ℕ) : n * (m - k) = n * m - n * k :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.mul_sub_left_distrib n m k`
example (n m k : ℕ) : n * m - n * k = n * (m - k) :=
by library_search -- says: `exact eq.symm (nat.mul_sub_left_distrib n m k)`
example {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) : m ≤ n - 1 :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.le_pred_of_lt h`
example {α : Type} (x y : α) : x = y ↔ y = x :=
by library_search -- says: `exact eq_comm`
example (a b : ℕ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_pos ha hb`
example (a b : ℕ) : 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a + b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_pos`
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a ∣ b) (w : b > 0) : a ≤ b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.le_of_dvd w h`
-- We even find `iff` results:
example : ∀ P : Prop, ¬(P ↔ ¬P) :=
by library_search -- says: `λ (a : Prop), (iff_not_self a).mp`
example {a b c : ℕ} (ha : a > 0) (w : b ∣ c) : a * b ∣ a * c :=
by library_search -- exact mul_dvd_mul_left a w
example {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : a ∣ c) (h₂ : a ∣ b + c) : a ∣ b :=
by library_search -- says `exact (nat.dvd_add_left h₁).mp h₂`
-- We have control of how `library_search` uses `solve_by_elim`.
-- In particular, we can add extra lemmas to the `solve_by_elim` step
-- (i.e. for `library_search` to use to attempt to discharge subgoals
-- after successfully applying a lemma from the library.)
example {a b c d: nat} (h₁ : a < c) (h₂ : b < d) : max (c + d) (a + b) = (c + d) :=
begin
library_search [add_lt_add], -- Says: `exact max_eq_left_of_lt (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)`
end
-- We can also use attributes:
meta def ex_attr : user_attribute := {
name := `ex,
descr := "A lemma that should be applied by `library_search` when discharging subgoals."
}
run_cmd attribute.register ``ex_attr
attribute [ex] add_lt_add
example {a b c d: nat} (h₁ : a < c) (h₂ : b < d) : max (c + d) (a + b) = (c + d) :=
begin
suggest with ex,
library_search with ex, -- Says: `exact max_eq_left_of_lt (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)`
end
example (a b : ℕ) (h : 0 < b) : (a * b) / b = a :=
by library_search -- Says: `exact nat.mul_div_left a h`
example (a b : ℕ) (h : b ≠ 0) : (a * b) / b = a :=
begin
success_if_fail { library_search },
library_search [nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr],
end
-- Checking examples from issue #2220
example {α : Sort*} (h : empty) : α :=
by library_search
example {α : Type*} (h : empty) : α :=
by library_search
def map_from_sum {A B C : Type} (f : A → C) (g : B → C) : (A ⊕ B) → C := by library_search
-- Test that we can provide custom `apply` tactics,
-- e.g. to change how aggressively we unfold definitions in trying to apply lemmas.
lemma bind_singleton {α β} (x : α) (f : α → list β) : list.bind [x] f = f x :=
begin
success_if_fail {
library_search { apply := λ e, tactic.apply e { md := tactic.transparency.reducible } },
},
library_search,
end
end test.library_search
|
dac548a81e839f770bfb6c80428a3251435abdf5 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Elab/Import.lean | 4d5ac679e02b2bf02fecca5ae37691b7321b950e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,009 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Parser.Module
namespace Lean
namespace Elab
def headerToImports (header : Syntax) : List Import :=
let header := header.asNode;
let imports := if (header.getArg 0).isNone then [{Import . module := `Init.Default}] else [];
imports ++ (header.getArg 1).getArgs.toList.map (fun stx =>
-- `stx` is of the form `(Module.import "import" "runtime"? id)
let runtime := !(stx.getArg 1).isNone;
let id := stx.getIdAt 2;
{ module := normalizeModuleName id, runtimeOnly := runtime })
def processHeader (header : Syntax) (messages : MessageLog) (inputCtx : Parser.InputContext) (trustLevel : UInt32 := 0) : IO (Environment × MessageLog) :=
catch
(do env ← importModules (headerToImports header) trustLevel;
pure (env, messages))
(fun e => do
env ← mkEmptyEnvironment;
let spos := header.getPos.getD 0;
let pos := inputCtx.fileMap.toPosition spos;
pure (env, messages.add { fileName := inputCtx.fileName, data := toString e, pos := pos }))
def parseImports (input : String) (fileName : Option String := none) : IO (List Import × Position × MessageLog) := do
env ← mkEmptyEnvironment;
let fileName := fileName.getD "<input>";
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext input fileName;
match Parser.parseHeader env inputCtx with
| (header, parserState, messages) => do
pure (headerToImports header, inputCtx.fileMap.toPosition parserState.pos, messages)
@[export lean_parse_imports]
def parseImportsExport (input : String) (fileName : Option String) : IO (List Import × Position × List Message) := do
(imports, pos, log) ← parseImports input fileName;
pure (imports, pos, log.toList)
@[export lean_print_deps]
def printDeps (deps : List Import) : IO Unit :=
deps.forM $ fun dep => do
fname ← findOLean dep.module;
IO.println fname
end Elab
end Lean
|
e4f5f3b5a3863c261cb17abe32449b7103382781 | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/combinatorics/derangements/exponential.lean | 9d1a1dc3c58aeab7a300725fb7ec8e432fa7c4ef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,887 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Henry Swanson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Henry Swanson, Patrick Massot
-/
import analysis.normed_space.exponential
import combinatorics.derangements.finite
import order.filter.basic
/-!
# Derangement exponential series
This file proves that the probability of a permutation on n elements being a derangement is 1/e.
The specific lemma is `num_derangements_tendsto_inv_e`.
-/
open filter
open_locale big_operators
open_locale topological_space
theorem num_derangements_tendsto_inv_e :
tendsto (λ n, (num_derangements n : ℝ) / n.factorial) at_top
(𝓝 (real.exp (-1))) :=
begin
-- we show that d(n)/n! is the partial sum of exp(-1), but offset by 1.
-- this isn't entirely obvious, since we have to ensure that asc_factorial and
-- factorial interact in the right way, e.g., that k ≤ n always
let s : ℕ → ℝ := λ n, ∑ k in finset.range n, (-1 : ℝ)^k / k.factorial,
suffices : ∀ n : ℕ, (num_derangements n : ℝ) / n.factorial = s(n+1),
{ simp_rw this,
-- shift the function by 1, and then use the fact that the partial sums
-- converge to the infinite sum
rw tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat 1,
apply has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat,
-- there's no specific lemma for ℝ that ∑ x^k/k! sums to exp(x), but it's
-- true in more general fields, so use that lemma
rw real.exp_eq_exp_ℝ_ℝ,
exact exp_series_field_has_sum_exp (-1 : ℝ) },
intro n,
rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, num_derangements_sum],
push_cast,
rw finset.sum_div,
-- get down to individual terms
refine finset.sum_congr (refl _) _,
intros k hk,
have h_le : k ≤ n := finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hk,
rw [nat.asc_factorial_eq_div, nat.add_sub_cancel' h_le],
push_cast [nat.factorial_dvd_factorial h_le],
field_simp [nat.factorial_ne_zero],
ring,
end
|
0dc1934b134b4fef094d57063545a69f3dcfd78c | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/bigUnivOffsets.lean | 1cb12dc39230d70bbf4c8ca63ca78e9a121a6baf | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62 | lean | #check Type 100000000
universe u
#check Type (u + 10000000)
|
7f538e79c78e831485078d1166dd6df64ade7d0c | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/linear_algebra/invariant_basis_number_auto.lean | 193bc6d19807111cea9fc302eb22558e842f6ff0 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,026 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import Mathlib.ring_theory.ideal.basic
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u l v w
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Invariant basis number property
We say that a ring `R` satisfies the invariant basis number property if there is a well-defined
notion of the rank of a finitely generated free (left) `R`-module. Since a finitely generated free
module with a basis consisting of `n` elements is linearly equivalent to `fin n → R`, it is
sufficient that `(fin n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (fin m → R)` implies `n = m`.
## Main definitions
`invariant_basis_number R` is a type class stating that `R` has the invariant basis number property.
## Main results
We show that every nontrivial commutative ring has the invariant basis number property.
## Future work
So far, there is no API at all for the `invariant_basis_number` class. There are several natural
ways to formulate that a module `M` is finitely generated and free, for example
`M ≃ₗ[R] (fin n → R)`, `M ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R)`, where `ι` is a fintype, or prividing a basis indexed by
a finite type. There should be lemmas applying the invariant basis number property to each
situation.
The finite version of the invariant basis number property implies the infinite analogue, i.e., that
`(ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] (ι' →₀ R)` implies that `cardinal.mk ι = cardinal.mk ι'`. This fact (and its
variants) should be formalized.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariant_basis_number
## Tags
free module, rank, invariant basis number, IBN
-/
/-- We say that `R` has the invariant basis number property if `(fin n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (fin m → R)`
implies `n = m`. This gives rise to a well-defined notion of rank of a finitely generated free
module. -/
class invariant_basis_number (R : Type u) [ring R] where
eq_of_fin_equiv : ∀ {n m : ℕ}, linear_equiv R (fin n → R) (fin m → R) → n = m
theorem eq_of_fin_equiv (R : Type u) [ring R] [invariant_basis_number R] {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
linear_equiv R (fin n → R) (fin m → R) → n = m :=
invariant_basis_number.eq_of_fin_equiv
theorem nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number (R : Type u) [ring R] [invariant_basis_number R] :
nontrivial R :=
sorry
/-- A field has invariant basis number. This will be superseded below by the fact that any nonzero
commutative ring has invariant basis number. -/
theorem invariant_basis_number_field {K : Type u} [field K] : invariant_basis_number K := sorry
/-!
We want to show that nontrivial commutative rings have invariant basis number. The idea is to
take a maximal ideal `I` of `R` and use an isomorphism `R^n ≃ R^m` of `R` modules to produce an
isomorphism `(R/I)^n ≃ (R/I)^m` of `R/I`-modules, which will imply `n = m` since `R/I` is a field
and we know that fields have invariant basis number.
We construct the isomorphism in two steps:
1. We construct the ring `R^n/I^n`, show that it is an `R/I`-module and show that there is an
isomorphism of `R/I`-modules `R^n/I^n ≃ (R/I)^n`. This isomorphism is called
`ideal.pi_quot_equiv` and is located in the file `ring_theory/ideals.lean`.
2. We construct an isomorphism of `R/I`-modules `R^n/I^n ≃ R^m/I^m` using the isomorphism
`R^n ≃ R^m`.
-/
/-- An `R`-linear map `R^n → R^m` induces a function `R^n/I^n → R^m/I^m`. -/
/-- An isomorphism of `R`-modules `R^n ≃ R^m` induces an isomorphism `R/I`-modules
`R^n/I^n ≃ R^m/I^m`. -/
/-- Nontrivial commutative rings have the invariant basis number property. -/
protected instance invariant_basis_number_of_nontrivial_of_comm_ring {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
[nontrivial R] : invariant_basis_number R :=
invariant_basis_number.mk fun (n m : ℕ) (e : linear_equiv R (fin n → R) (fin m → R)) => sorry
end Mathlib |
87dec63672f4bc1fbc778995f732c13e39fa000a | a4673261e60b025e2c8c825dfa4ab9108246c32e | /stage0/src/Lean/Data/Lsp/Capabilities.lean | 3ad3e7386edad9e13a94aedb66eeeaf8019e5ec4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/lean4 | c02dec0cc32c4bccab009285475f265f17d73228 | 2909313475588cc20ac0436e55548a4502050d0a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,129,550,893 | 1,606,415,348,000 | 1,606,415,348,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 936 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Marc Huisinga. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Marc Huisinga, Wojciech Nawrocki
-/
import Lean.Data.JsonRpc
import Lean.Data.Lsp.TextSync
/-! Minimal LSP servers/clients do not have to implement a lot
of functionality. Most useful additional behaviour is instead
opted into via capabilities. -/
namespace Lean
namespace Lsp
open Json
-- TODO: right now we ignore the client's capabilities
inductive ClientCapabilities :=
| mk
instance : FromJson ClientCapabilities :=
⟨fun j => ClientCapabilities.mk⟩
-- TODO largely unimplemented
structure ServerCapabilities :=
(textDocumentSync? : Option TextDocumentSyncOptions := none)
(hoverProvider : Bool := false)
instance : ToJson ServerCapabilities := ⟨fun o => mkObj $
opt "textDocumentSync" o.textDocumentSync? ++
[⟨"hoverProvider", o.hoverProvider⟩]⟩
end Lsp
end Lean
|
77b3c95c3a2a9f414cec57fc32707cfe4b871c39 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/linear_algebra/alternating.lean | c828f011cb6947fb2237b9d2fc2ce36f3b77ea60 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 31,924 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhangir Azerbayev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Zhangir Azerbayev
-/
import linear_algebra.multilinear.basis
import linear_algebra.multilinear.tensor_product
import linear_algebra.linear_independent
import group_theory.perm.sign
import group_theory.perm.subgroup
import data.equiv.fin
import group_theory.quotient_group
/-!
# Alternating Maps
We construct the bundled function `alternating_map`, which extends `multilinear_map` with all the
arguments of the same type.
## Main definitions
* `alternating_map R M N ι` is the space of `R`-linear alternating maps from `ι → M` to `N`.
* `f.map_eq_zero_of_eq` expresses that `f` is zero when two inputs are equal.
* `f.map_swap` expresses that `f` is negated when two inputs are swapped.
* `f.map_perm` expresses how `f` varies by a sign change under a permutation of its inputs.
* An `add_comm_monoid`, `add_comm_group`, and `module` structure over `alternating_map`s that
matches the definitions over `multilinear_map`s.
* `multilinear_map.alternatization`, which makes an alternating map out of a non-alternating one.
* `alternating_map.dom_coprod`, which behaves as a product between two alternating maps.
## Implementation notes
`alternating_map` is defined in terms of `map_eq_zero_of_eq`, as this is easier to work with than
using `map_swap` as a definition, and does not require `has_neg N`.
`alternating_map`s are provided with a coercion to `multilinear_map`, along with a set of
`norm_cast` lemmas that act on the algebraic structure:
* `alternating_map.coe_add`
* `alternating_map.coe_zero`
* `alternating_map.coe_sub`
* `alternating_map.coe_neg`
* `alternating_map.coe_smul`
-/
-- semiring / add_comm_monoid
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R]
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
variables {N : Type*} [add_comm_monoid N] [module R N]
-- semiring / add_comm_group
variables {M' : Type*} [add_comm_group M'] [module R M']
variables {N' : Type*} [add_comm_group N'] [module R N']
variables {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
section
variables (R M N ι)
/--
An alternating map is a multilinear map that vanishes when two of its arguments are equal.
-/
structure alternating_map extends multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N :=
(map_eq_zero_of_eq' : ∀ (v : ι → M) (i j : ι) (h : v i = v j) (hij : i ≠ j), to_fun v = 0)
end
/-- The multilinear map associated to an alternating map -/
add_decl_doc alternating_map.to_multilinear_map
namespace alternating_map
variables (f f' : alternating_map R M N ι)
variables (g g₂ : alternating_map R M N' ι)
variables (g' : alternating_map R M' N' ι)
variables (v : ι → M) (v' : ι → M')
open function
/-! Basic coercion simp lemmas, largely copied from `ring_hom` and `multilinear_map` -/
section coercions
instance : has_coe_to_fun (alternating_map R M N ι) (λ _, (ι → M) → N) := ⟨λ x, x.to_fun⟩
initialize_simps_projections alternating_map (to_fun → apply)
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe : f.to_fun = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : (ι → M) → N) (h₁ h₂ h₃) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ :
alternating_map R M N ι) = f := rfl
theorem congr_fun {f g : alternating_map R M N ι} (h : f = g) (x : ι → M) : f x = g x :=
congr_arg (λ h : alternating_map R M N ι, h x) h
theorem congr_arg (f : alternating_map R M N ι) {x y : ι → M} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg (λ x : ι → M, f x) h
theorem coe_injective : injective (coe_fn : alternating_map R M N ι → ((ι → M) → N)) :=
λ f g h, by { cases f, cases g, cases h, refl }
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_inj {f g : alternating_map R M N ι} :
(f : (ι → M) → N) = g ↔ f = g :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[ext] theorem ext {f f' : alternating_map R M N ι} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
coe_injective (funext H)
theorem ext_iff {f g : alternating_map R M N ι} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, λ h, ext h⟩
instance : has_coe (alternating_map R M N ι) (multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N) :=
⟨λ x, x.to_multilinear_map⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_multilinear_map : ⇑(f : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N) = f := rfl
lemma coe_multilinear_map_injective :
function.injective (coe : alternating_map R M N ι → multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N) :=
λ x y h, ext $ multilinear_map.congr_fun h
@[simp] lemma to_multilinear_map_eq_coe : f.to_multilinear_map = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_multilinear_map_mk (f : (ι → M) → N) (h₁ h₂ h₃) :
((⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ : alternating_map R M N ι) : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N) = ⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ :=
rfl
end coercions
/-!
### Simp-normal forms of the structure fields
These are expressed in terms of `⇑f` instead of `f.to_fun`.
-/
@[simp] lemma map_add (i : ι) (x y : M) :
f (update v i (x + y)) = f (update v i x) + f (update v i y) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_add' v i x y
@[simp] lemma map_sub (i : ι) (x y : M') :
g' (update v' i (x - y)) = g' (update v' i x) - g' (update v' i y) :=
g'.to_multilinear_map.map_sub v' i x y
@[simp] lemma map_neg (i : ι) (x : M') :
g' (update v' i (-x)) = -g' (update v' i x) :=
g'.to_multilinear_map.map_neg v' i x
@[simp] lemma map_smul (i : ι) (r : R) (x : M) :
f (update v i (r • x)) = r • f (update v i x) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_smul' v i r x
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_of_eq (v : ι → M) {i j : ι} (h : v i = v j) (hij : i ≠ j) :
f v = 0 :=
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq' v i j h hij
lemma map_coord_zero {m : ι → M} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_coord_zero i h
@[simp] lemma map_update_zero (m : ι → M) (i : ι) : f (update m i 0) = 0 :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_update_zero m i
@[simp] lemma map_zero [nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_zero
lemma map_eq_zero_of_not_injective (v : ι → M) (hv : ¬function.injective v) : f v = 0 :=
begin
rw function.injective at hv,
push_neg at hv,
rcases hv with ⟨i₁, i₂, heq, hne⟩,
exact f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v heq hne
end
/-!
### Algebraic structure inherited from `multilinear_map`
`alternating_map` carries the same `add_comm_monoid`, `add_comm_group`, and `module` structure
as `multilinear_map`
-/
instance : has_add (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
⟨λ a b,
{ map_eq_zero_of_eq' :=
λ v i j h hij, by simp [a.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij, b.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
..(a + b : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N)}⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (f + f') v = f v + f' v := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_add : (↑(f + f') : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N) = f + f' := rfl
instance : has_zero (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
⟨{map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j h hij, by simp,
..(0 : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N)}⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply : (0 : alternating_map R M N ι) v = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_zero :
((0 : alternating_map R M N ι) : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N) = 0 := rfl
instance : inhabited (alternating_map R M N ι) := ⟨0⟩
instance : add_comm_monoid (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
zero_add := by intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm],
add_zero := by intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm],
add_comm := by intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm],
add_assoc := by intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm],
nsmul := λ n f, { map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j h hij, by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
.. ((n • f : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N)) },
nsmul_zero' := by { intros, ext, simp [add_smul], },
nsmul_succ' := by { intros, ext, simp [add_smul, nat.succ_eq_one_add], } }
instance : has_neg (alternating_map R M N' ι) :=
⟨λ f,
{ map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j h hij, by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
..(-(f : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N')) }⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply (m : ι → M) : (-g) m = -(g m) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_neg :
((-g : alternating_map R M N' ι) : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N') = -g := rfl
instance : has_sub (alternating_map R M N' ι) :=
⟨λ f g,
{ map_eq_zero_of_eq' :=
λ v i j h hij, by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij, g.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
..(f - g : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N') }⟩
@[simp] lemma sub_apply (m : ι → M) : (g - g₂) m = g m - g₂ m := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : (↑(g - g₂) : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N') = g - g₂ := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (alternating_map R M N' ι) :=
by refine
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
neg := has_neg.neg,
sub := has_sub.sub,
sub_eq_add_neg := _,
nsmul := λ n f, { map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j h hij, by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
.. ((n • f : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N')) },
zsmul := λ n f, { map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j h hij, by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
.. ((n • f : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N')) },
zsmul_zero' := _,
zsmul_succ' := _,
zsmul_neg' := _,
.. alternating_map.add_comm_monoid, .. };
intros; ext;
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, add_smul, nat.succ_eq_add_one, coe_nat_zsmul]
section distrib_mul_action
variables {S : Type*} [monoid S] [distrib_mul_action S N] [smul_comm_class R S N]
instance : has_scalar S (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
⟨λ c f,
{ map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j h hij, by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
..((c • f : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N)) }⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (c : S) (m : ι → M) :
(c • f) m = c • f m := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_smul (c : S):
((c • f : alternating_map R M N ι) : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N) = c • f := rfl
lemma coe_fn_smul (c : S) (f : alternating_map R M N ι) : ⇑(c • f) = c • f :=
rfl
instance : distrib_mul_action S (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
{ one_smul := λ f, ext $ λ x, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ c₁ c₂ f, ext $ λ x, mul_smul _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ r, ext $ λ x, smul_zero _,
smul_add := λ r f₁ f₂, ext $ λ x, smul_add _ _ _ }
end distrib_mul_action
section module
variables {S : Type*} [semiring S] [module S N] [smul_comm_class R S N]
/-- The space of multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the pointwise
addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : module S (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
{ add_smul := λ r₁ r₂ f, ext $ λ x, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ f, ext $ λ x, zero_smul _ _ }
instance [no_zero_smul_divisors S N] : no_zero_smul_divisors S (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
coe_injective.no_zero_smul_divisors _ rfl coe_fn_smul
end module
section
variables (R N)
/-- The evaluation map from `ι → N` to `N` at a given `i` is alternating when `ι` is subsingleton.
-/
@[simps]
def of_subsingleton [subsingleton ι] (i : ι) : alternating_map R N N ι :=
{ to_fun := function.eval i,
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j hv hij, (hij $ subsingleton.elim _ _).elim,
..multilinear_map.of_subsingleton R N i }
end
end alternating_map
/-!
### Composition with linear maps
-/
namespace linear_map
variables {N₂ : Type*} [add_comm_monoid N₂] [module R N₂]
/-- Composing a alternating map with a linear map gives again a alternating map. -/
def comp_alternating_map (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) : alternating_map R M N ι →+ alternating_map R M N₂ ι :=
{ to_fun := λ f,
{ map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j h hij, by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij],
..(g.comp_multilinear_map (f : multilinear_map R (λ _ : ι, M) N)) },
map_zero' := by { ext, simp },
map_add' := λ a b, by { ext, simp } }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp_alternating_map (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f : alternating_map R M N ι) :
⇑(g.comp_alternating_map f) = g ∘ f := rfl
lemma comp_alternating_map_apply (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f : alternating_map R M N ι) (m : ι → M) :
g.comp_alternating_map f m = g (f m) := rfl
end linear_map
namespace alternating_map
variables (f f' : alternating_map R M N ι)
variables (g g₂ : alternating_map R M N' ι)
variables (g' : alternating_map R M' N' ι)
variables (v : ι → M) (v' : ι → M')
open function
/-!
### Other lemmas from `multilinear_map`
-/
section
open_locale big_operators
lemma map_update_sum {α : Type*} (t : finset α) (i : ι) (g : α → M) (m : ι → M):
f (update m i (∑ a in t, g a)) = ∑ a in t, f (update m i (g a)) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_update_sum t i g m
end
/-!
### Theorems specific to alternating maps
Various properties of reordered and repeated inputs which follow from
`alternating_map.map_eq_zero_of_eq`.
-/
lemma map_update_self {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
f (function.update v i (v j)) = 0 :=
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ (by rw [function.update_same, function.update_noteq hij.symm]) hij
lemma map_update_update {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) (m : M) :
f (function.update (function.update v i m) j m) = 0 :=
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _
(by rw [function.update_same, function.update_noteq hij, function.update_same]) hij
lemma map_swap_add {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
f (v ∘ equiv.swap i j) + f v = 0 :=
begin
rw equiv.comp_swap_eq_update,
convert f.map_update_update v hij (v i + v j),
simp [f.map_update_self _ hij,
f.map_update_self _ hij.symm,
function.update_comm hij (v i + v j) (v _) v,
function.update_comm hij.symm (v i) (v i) v],
end
lemma map_add_swap {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
f v + f (v ∘ equiv.swap i j) = 0 :=
by { rw add_comm, exact f.map_swap_add v hij }
lemma map_swap {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
g (v ∘ equiv.swap i j) = - g v :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero (g.map_swap_add v hij)
lemma map_perm [fintype ι] (v : ι → M) (σ : equiv.perm ι) :
g (v ∘ σ) = σ.sign • g v :=
begin
apply equiv.perm.swap_induction_on' σ,
{ simp },
{ intros s x y hxy hI,
simpa [g.map_swap (v ∘ s) hxy, equiv.perm.sign_swap hxy] using hI, }
end
lemma map_congr_perm [fintype ι] (σ : equiv.perm ι) :
g v = σ.sign • g (v ∘ σ) :=
by { rw [g.map_perm, smul_smul], simp }
lemma coe_dom_dom_congr [fintype ι] (σ : equiv.perm ι) :
(g : multilinear_map R (λ _ : ι, M) N').dom_dom_congr σ
= σ.sign • (g : multilinear_map R (λ _ : ι, M) N') :=
multilinear_map.ext $ λ v, g.map_perm v σ
/-- If the arguments are linearly dependent then the result is `0`. -/
lemma map_linear_dependent
{K : Type*} [ring K]
{M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module K M]
{N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [module K N] [no_zero_smul_divisors K N]
(f : alternating_map K M N ι) (v : ι → M)
(h : ¬linear_independent K v) :
f v = 0 :=
begin
obtain ⟨s, g, h, i, hi, hz⟩ := linear_dependent_iff.mp h,
suffices : f (update v i (g i • v i)) = 0,
{ rw [f.map_smul, function.update_eq_self, smul_eq_zero] at this,
exact or.resolve_left this hz, },
conv at h in (g _ • v _) { rw ←if_t_t (i = x) (g _ • v _), },
rw [finset.sum_ite, finset.filter_eq, finset.filter_ne, if_pos hi, finset.sum_singleton,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h,
rw [h, f.map_neg, f.map_update_sum, neg_eq_zero, finset.sum_eq_zero],
intros j hj,
obtain ⟨hij, _⟩ := finset.mem_erase.mp hj,
rw [f.map_smul, f.map_update_self _ hij.symm, smul_zero],
end
end alternating_map
open_locale big_operators
namespace multilinear_map
open equiv
variables [fintype ι]
private lemma alternization_map_eq_zero_of_eq_aux
(m : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N')
(v : ι → M) (i j : ι) (i_ne_j : i ≠ j) (hv : v i = v j) :
(∑ (σ : perm ι), σ.sign • m.dom_dom_congr σ) v = 0 :=
begin
rw sum_apply,
exact finset.sum_involution
(λ σ _, swap i j * σ)
(λ σ _, by simp [perm.sign_swap i_ne_j, apply_swap_eq_self hv])
(λ σ _ _, (not_congr swap_mul_eq_iff).mpr i_ne_j)
(λ σ _, finset.mem_univ _)
(λ σ _, swap_mul_involutive i j σ)
end
/-- Produce an `alternating_map` out of a `multilinear_map`, by summing over all argument
permutations. -/
def alternatization : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N' →+ alternating_map R M N' ι :=
{ to_fun := λ m,
{ to_fun := ⇑(∑ (σ : perm ι), σ.sign • m.dom_dom_congr σ),
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j hvij hij, alternization_map_eq_zero_of_eq_aux m v i j hij hvij,
.. (∑ (σ : perm ι), σ.sign • m.dom_dom_congr σ)},
map_add' := λ a b, begin
ext,
simp only [
finset.sum_add_distrib, smul_add, add_apply, dom_dom_congr_apply, alternating_map.add_apply,
alternating_map.coe_mk, smul_apply, sum_apply],
end,
map_zero' := begin
ext,
simp only [
finset.sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply, dom_dom_congr_apply, alternating_map.zero_apply,
alternating_map.coe_mk, smul_apply, sum_apply],
end }
lemma alternatization_def (m : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N') :
⇑(alternatization m) = (∑ (σ : perm ι), σ.sign • m.dom_dom_congr σ : _) :=
rfl
lemma alternatization_coe (m : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N') :
↑m.alternatization = (∑ (σ : perm ι), σ.sign • m.dom_dom_congr σ : _) :=
coe_injective rfl
lemma alternatization_apply (m : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, M) N') (v : ι → M) :
alternatization m v = ∑ (σ : perm ι), σ.sign • m.dom_dom_congr σ v :=
by simp only [alternatization_def, smul_apply, sum_apply]
end multilinear_map
namespace alternating_map
/-- Alternatizing a multilinear map that is already alternating results in a scale factor of `n!`,
where `n` is the number of inputs. -/
lemma coe_alternatization [fintype ι] (a : alternating_map R M N' ι) :
(↑a : multilinear_map R (λ ι, M) N').alternatization = nat.factorial (fintype.card ι) • a :=
begin
apply alternating_map.coe_injective,
simp_rw [multilinear_map.alternatization_def, coe_dom_dom_congr, smul_smul,
int.units_mul_self, one_smul, finset.sum_const, finset.card_univ, fintype.card_perm,
←coe_multilinear_map, coe_smul],
end
end alternating_map
namespace linear_map
variables {N'₂ : Type*} [add_comm_group N'₂] [module R N'₂] [fintype ι]
/-- Composition with a linear map before and after alternatization are equivalent. -/
lemma comp_multilinear_map_alternatization (g : N' →ₗ[R] N'₂)
(f : multilinear_map R (λ _ : ι, M) N') :
(g.comp_multilinear_map f).alternatization = g.comp_alternating_map (f.alternatization) :=
by { ext, simp [multilinear_map.alternatization_def] }
end linear_map
section coprod
open_locale big_operators
open_locale tensor_product
variables {ιa ιb : Type*} [decidable_eq ιa] [decidable_eq ιb] [fintype ιa] [fintype ιb]
variables
{R' : Type*} {Mᵢ N₁ N₂ : Type*}
[comm_semiring R']
[add_comm_group N₁] [module R' N₁]
[add_comm_group N₂] [module R' N₂]
[add_comm_monoid Mᵢ] [module R' Mᵢ]
namespace equiv.perm
/-- Elements which are considered equivalent if they differ only by swaps within α or β -/
abbreviation mod_sum_congr (α β : Type*) :=
quotient_group.quotient (equiv.perm.sum_congr_hom α β).range
lemma mod_sum_congr.swap_smul_involutive {α β : Type*} [decidable_eq (α ⊕ β)] (i j : α ⊕ β) :
function.involutive (has_scalar.smul (equiv.swap i j) : mod_sum_congr α β → mod_sum_congr α β) :=
λ σ, begin
apply σ.induction_on' (λ σ, _),
exact _root_.congr_arg quotient.mk' (equiv.swap_mul_involutive i j σ)
end
end equiv.perm
namespace alternating_map
open equiv
/-- summand used in `alternating_map.dom_coprod` -/
def dom_coprod.summand
(a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb)
(σ : perm.mod_sum_congr ιa ιb) :
multilinear_map R' (λ _ : ιa ⊕ ιb, Mᵢ) (N₁ ⊗[R'] N₂) :=
quotient.lift_on' σ
(λ σ,
σ.sign •
(multilinear_map.dom_coprod ↑a ↑b : multilinear_map R' (λ _, Mᵢ) (N₁ ⊗ N₂)).dom_dom_congr σ)
(λ σ₁ σ₂ ⟨⟨sl, sr⟩, h⟩, begin
ext v,
simp only [multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr_apply, multilinear_map.dom_coprod_apply,
coe_multilinear_map, multilinear_map.smul_apply],
replace h := inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul.mp h.symm,
have : (σ₁ * perm.sum_congr_hom _ _ (sl, sr)).sign = σ₁.sign * (sl.sign * sr.sign) :=
by simp,
rw [h, this, mul_smul, mul_smul, smul_left_cancel_iff,
←tensor_product.tmul_smul, tensor_product.smul_tmul'],
simp only [sum.map_inr, perm.sum_congr_hom_apply, perm.sum_congr_apply, sum.map_inl,
function.comp_app, perm.coe_mul],
rw [←a.map_congr_perm (λ i, v (σ₁ _)), ←b.map_congr_perm (λ i, v (σ₁ _))],
end)
lemma dom_coprod.summand_mk'
(a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb)
(σ : equiv.perm (ιa ⊕ ιb)) :
dom_coprod.summand a b (quotient.mk' σ) = σ.sign •
(multilinear_map.dom_coprod ↑a ↑b : multilinear_map R' (λ _, Mᵢ) (N₁ ⊗ N₂)).dom_dom_congr σ :=
rfl
/-- Swapping elements in `σ` with equal values in `v` results in an addition that cancels -/
lemma dom_coprod.summand_add_swap_smul_eq_zero
(a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb)
(σ : perm.mod_sum_congr ιa ιb)
{v : ιa ⊕ ιb → Mᵢ} {i j : ιa ⊕ ιb} (hv : v i = v j) (hij : i ≠ j) :
dom_coprod.summand a b σ v + dom_coprod.summand a b (swap i j • σ) v = 0 :=
begin
apply σ.induction_on' (λ σ, _),
dsimp only [quotient.lift_on'_mk', quotient.map'_mk', mul_action.quotient.smul_mk,
dom_coprod.summand],
rw [perm.sign_mul, perm.sign_swap hij],
simp only [one_mul, units.neg_mul, function.comp_app, units.neg_smul, perm.coe_mul,
units.coe_neg, multilinear_map.smul_apply, multilinear_map.neg_apply,
multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr_apply, multilinear_map.dom_coprod_apply],
convert add_right_neg _;
{ ext k, rw equiv.apply_swap_eq_self hv },
end
/-- Swapping elements in `σ` with equal values in `v` result in zero if the swap has no effect
on the quotient. -/
lemma dom_coprod.summand_eq_zero_of_smul_invariant
(a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb)
(σ : perm.mod_sum_congr ιa ιb)
{v : ιa ⊕ ιb → Mᵢ} {i j : ιa ⊕ ιb} (hv : v i = v j) (hij : i ≠ j) :
swap i j • σ = σ → dom_coprod.summand a b σ v = 0 :=
begin
apply σ.induction_on' (λ σ, _),
dsimp only [quotient.lift_on'_mk', quotient.map'_mk', multilinear_map.smul_apply,
multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr_apply, multilinear_map.dom_coprod_apply, dom_coprod.summand],
intro hσ,
with_cases {
cases hi : σ⁻¹ i;
cases hj : σ⁻¹ j;
rw perm.inv_eq_iff_eq at hi hj;
substs hi hj, },
case [sum.inl sum.inr : i' j', sum.inr sum.inl : i' j'] {
-- the term pairs with and cancels another term
all_goals { obtain ⟨⟨sl, sr⟩, hσ⟩ := quotient.exact' hσ, },
work_on_goal 0 { replace hσ := equiv.congr_fun hσ (sum.inl i'), },
work_on_goal 1 { replace hσ := equiv.congr_fun hσ (sum.inr i'), },
all_goals {
rw [←equiv.mul_swap_eq_swap_mul, mul_inv_rev, equiv.swap_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right] at hσ,
simpa using hσ, }, },
case [sum.inr sum.inr : i' j', sum.inl sum.inl : i' j'] {
-- the term does not pair but is zero
all_goals { convert smul_zero _, },
work_on_goal 0 { convert tensor_product.tmul_zero _ _, },
work_on_goal 1 { convert tensor_product.zero_tmul _ _, },
all_goals { exact alternating_map.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ _ hv (λ hij', hij (hij' ▸ rfl)), } },
end
/-- Like `multilinear_map.dom_coprod`, but ensures the result is also alternating.
Note that this is usually defined (for instance, as used in Proposition 22.24 in [Gallier2011Notes])
over integer indices `ιa = fin n` and `ιb = fin m`, as
$$
(f \wedge g)(u_1, \ldots, u_{m+n}) =
\sum_{\operatorname{shuffle}(m, n)} \operatorname{sign}(\sigma)
f(u_{\sigma(1)}, \ldots, u_{\sigma(m)}) g(u_{\sigma(m+1)}, \ldots, u_{\sigma(m+n)}),
$$
where $\operatorname{shuffle}(m, n)$ consists of all permutations of $[1, m+n]$ such that
$\sigma(1) < \cdots < \sigma(m)$ and $\sigma(m+1) < \cdots < \sigma(m+n)$.
Here, we generalize this by replacing:
* the product in the sum with a tensor product
* the filtering of $[1, m+n]$ to shuffles with an isomorphic quotient
* the additions in the subscripts of $\sigma$ with an index of type `sum`
The specialized version can be obtained by combining this definition with `fin_sum_fin_equiv` and
`algebra.lmul'`.
-/
@[simps]
def dom_coprod
(a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb) :
alternating_map R' Mᵢ (N₁ ⊗[R'] N₂) (ιa ⊕ ιb) :=
{ to_fun := λ v, ⇑(∑ σ : perm.mod_sum_congr ιa ιb, dom_coprod.summand a b σ) v,
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := λ v i j hv hij, begin
dsimp only,
rw multilinear_map.sum_apply,
exact finset.sum_involution
(λ σ _, equiv.swap i j • σ)
(λ σ _, dom_coprod.summand_add_swap_smul_eq_zero a b σ hv hij)
(λ σ _, mt $ dom_coprod.summand_eq_zero_of_smul_invariant a b σ hv hij)
(λ σ _, finset.mem_univ _)
(λ σ _, equiv.perm.mod_sum_congr.swap_smul_involutive i j σ),
end,
..(∑ σ : perm.mod_sum_congr ιa ιb, dom_coprod.summand a b σ) }
lemma dom_coprod_coe (a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb) :
(↑(a.dom_coprod b) : multilinear_map R' (λ _, Mᵢ) _) =
∑ σ : perm.mod_sum_congr ιa ιb, dom_coprod.summand a b σ :=
multilinear_map.ext $ λ _, rfl
/-- A more bundled version of `alternating_map.dom_coprod` that maps
`((ι₁ → N) → N₁) ⊗ ((ι₂ → N) → N₂)` to `(ι₁ ⊕ ι₂ → N) → N₁ ⊗ N₂`. -/
def dom_coprod' :
(alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa ⊗[R'] alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb) →ₗ[R']
alternating_map R' Mᵢ (N₁ ⊗[R'] N₂) (ιa ⊕ ιb) :=
tensor_product.lift $ by
refine linear_map.mk₂ R' (dom_coprod)
(λ m₁ m₂ n, _)
(λ c m n, _)
(λ m n₁ n₂, _)
(λ c m n, _);
{ ext,
simp only [dom_coprod_apply, add_apply, smul_apply, ←finset.sum_add_distrib,
finset.smul_sum, multilinear_map.sum_apply, dom_coprod.summand],
congr,
ext σ,
apply σ.induction_on' (λ σ, _),
simp only [quotient.lift_on'_mk', coe_add, coe_smul, multilinear_map.smul_apply,
←multilinear_map.dom_coprod'_apply],
simp only [tensor_product.add_tmul, ←tensor_product.smul_tmul',
tensor_product.tmul_add, tensor_product.tmul_smul, linear_map.map_add, linear_map.map_smul],
rw ←smul_add <|> rw smul_comm,
congr }
@[simp]
lemma dom_coprod'_apply
(a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb) :
dom_coprod' (a ⊗ₜ[R'] b) = dom_coprod a b :=
by simp only [dom_coprod', tensor_product.lift.tmul, linear_map.mk₂_apply]
end alternating_map
open equiv
/-- A helper lemma for `multilinear_map.dom_coprod_alternization`. -/
lemma multilinear_map.dom_coprod_alternization_coe
(a : multilinear_map R' (λ _ : ιa, Mᵢ) N₁) (b : multilinear_map R' (λ _ : ιb, Mᵢ) N₂) :
multilinear_map.dom_coprod ↑a.alternatization ↑b.alternatization =
∑ (σa : perm ιa) (σb : perm ιb), σa.sign • σb.sign •
multilinear_map.dom_coprod (a.dom_dom_congr σa) (b.dom_dom_congr σb) :=
begin
simp_rw [←multilinear_map.dom_coprod'_apply, multilinear_map.alternatization_coe],
simp_rw [tensor_product.sum_tmul, tensor_product.tmul_sum, linear_map.map_sum,
←tensor_product.smul_tmul', tensor_product.tmul_smul, linear_map.map_smul_of_tower],
end
open alternating_map
/-- Computing the `multilinear_map.alternatization` of the `multilinear_map.dom_coprod` is the same
as computing the `alternating_map.dom_coprod` of the `multilinear_map.alternatization`s.
-/
lemma multilinear_map.dom_coprod_alternization
(a : multilinear_map R' (λ _ : ιa, Mᵢ) N₁) (b : multilinear_map R' (λ _ : ιb, Mᵢ) N₂) :
(multilinear_map.dom_coprod a b).alternatization =
a.alternatization.dom_coprod b.alternatization :=
begin
apply coe_multilinear_map_injective,
rw [dom_coprod_coe, multilinear_map.alternatization_coe,
finset.sum_partition (quotient_group.left_rel (perm.sum_congr_hom ιa ιb).range)],
congr' 1,
ext1 σ,
apply σ.induction_on' (λ σ, _),
-- unfold the quotient mess left by `finset.sum_partition`
conv in (_ = quotient.mk' _) {
change quotient.mk' _ = quotient.mk' _,
rw quotient.eq',
rw [quotient_group.left_rel],
dsimp only [setoid.r] },
-- eliminate a multiplication
have : @finset.univ (perm (ιa ⊕ ιb)) _ = finset.univ.image ((*) σ) :=
(finset.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr $ λ a, let ⟨a', ha'⟩ := mul_left_surjective σ a in
finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨a', finset.mem_univ _, ha'⟩).symm,
rw [this, finset.image_filter],
simp only [function.comp, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right, subgroup.inv_mem_iff],
simp only [monoid_hom.mem_range], -- needs to be separate from the above `simp only`
rw [finset.filter_congr_decidable,
finset.univ_filter_exists (perm.sum_congr_hom ιa ιb),
finset.sum_image (λ x _ y _ (h : _ = _), mul_right_injective _ h),
finset.sum_image (λ x _ y _ (h : _ = _), perm.sum_congr_hom_injective h)],
dsimp only,
-- now we're ready to clean up the RHS, pulling out the summation
rw [dom_coprod.summand_mk', multilinear_map.dom_coprod_alternization_coe,
←finset.sum_product', finset.univ_product_univ,
←multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr_equiv_apply, add_equiv.map_sum, finset.smul_sum],
congr' 1,
ext1 ⟨al, ar⟩,
dsimp only,
-- pull out the pair of smuls on the RHS, by rewriting to `_ →ₗ[ℤ] _` and back
rw [←add_equiv.coe_to_add_monoid_hom, ←add_monoid_hom.coe_to_int_linear_map,
linear_map.map_smul_of_tower,
linear_map.map_smul_of_tower,
add_monoid_hom.coe_to_int_linear_map, add_equiv.coe_to_add_monoid_hom,
multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr_equiv_apply],
-- pick up the pieces
rw [multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr_mul, perm.sign_mul,
perm.sum_congr_hom_apply, multilinear_map.dom_coprod_dom_dom_congr_sum_congr,
perm.sign_sum_congr, mul_smul, mul_smul],
end
/-- Taking the `multilinear_map.alternatization` of the `multilinear_map.dom_coprod` of two
`alternating_map`s gives a scaled version of the `alternating_map.coprod` of those maps.
-/
lemma multilinear_map.dom_coprod_alternization_eq
(a : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₁ ιa) (b : alternating_map R' Mᵢ N₂ ιb) :
(multilinear_map.dom_coprod a b : multilinear_map R' (λ _ : ιa ⊕ ιb, Mᵢ) (N₁ ⊗ N₂))
.alternatization =
((fintype.card ιa).factorial * (fintype.card ιb).factorial) • a.dom_coprod b :=
begin
rw [multilinear_map.dom_coprod_alternization, coe_alternatization, coe_alternatization, mul_smul,
←dom_coprod'_apply, ←dom_coprod'_apply, ←tensor_product.smul_tmul', tensor_product.tmul_smul,
linear_map.map_smul_of_tower dom_coprod', linear_map.map_smul_of_tower dom_coprod'],
-- typeclass resolution is a little confused here
apply_instance, apply_instance,
end
end coprod
section basis
open alternating_map
variables {ι₁ : Type*} [fintype ι]
variables {R' : Type*} {N₁ N₂ : Type*} [comm_semiring R'] [add_comm_monoid N₁] [add_comm_monoid N₂]
variables [module R' N₁] [module R' N₂]
/-- Two alternating maps indexed by a `fintype` are equal if they are equal when all arguments
are distinct basis vectors. -/
lemma basis.ext_alternating {f g : alternating_map R' N₁ N₂ ι} (e : basis ι₁ R' N₁)
(h : ∀ v : ι → ι₁, function.injective v → f (λ i, e (v i)) = g (λ i, e (v i))) : f = g :=
begin
refine alternating_map.coe_multilinear_map_injective (basis.ext_multilinear e $ λ v, _),
by_cases hi : function.injective v,
{ exact h v hi },
{ have : ¬function.injective (λ i, e (v i)) := hi.imp function.injective.of_comp,
rw [coe_multilinear_map, coe_multilinear_map,
f.map_eq_zero_of_not_injective _ this, g.map_eq_zero_of_not_injective _ this], }
end
end basis
|
0ea519315562e0034d3d912983bb389f65ac2f78 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/run/unreachable_cases.lean | 09606047a39ed95991df2e55dc1014f5efd21b1b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 600 | lean | open nat prod
inductive ifin : ℕ → Type -- inductively defined fin-type
| fz : Π n, ifin (succ n)
| fs : Π {n}, ifin n → ifin (succ n)
open ifin
noncomputable definition foo {N : Type} : Π{n : ℕ}, N → ifin n → (N × ifin n)
| (succ k) n (fz .k) := sorry
| (succ k) n (fs x) := sorry
noncomputable definition bar {N : Type} : Π{n : ℕ}, (N × ifin n) → (N × ifin n)
| (succ k) (n, fz .k) := sorry
| (succ k) (n, fs x) := sorry
noncomputable definition bar2 {N : Type} : Π{n : ℕ}, (N × ifin n) → (N × ifin n)
| (succ k) (n, fz .k) := sorry
| (succ k) (n, fs x) := sorry
|
961c79ae5a5ef198f07d9c1be7bc600c334459a1 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/mv_polynomial/monad.lean | aa55345fa1bc2ac5b8295a16568c409984f141ee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,430 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin and Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin and Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.mv_polynomial.rename
/-!
# Monad operations on `mv_polynomial`
This file defines two monadic operations on `mv_polynomial`. Given `p : mv_polynomial σ R`,
* `mv_polynomial.bind₁` and `mv_polynomial.join₁` operate on the variable type `σ`.
* `mv_polynomial.bind₂` and `mv_polynomial.join₂` operate on the coefficient type `R`.
- `mv_polynomial.bind₁ f φ` with `f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R` and `φ : mv_polynomial σ R`,
is the polynomial `φ(f 1, ..., f i, ...) : mv_polynomial τ R`.
- `mv_polynomial.join₁ φ` with `φ : mv_polynomial (mv_polynomial σ R) R` collapses `φ` to
a `mv_polynomial σ R`, by evaluating `φ` under the map `X f ↦ f` for `f : mv_polynomial σ R`.
In other words, if you have a polynomial `φ` in a set of variables indexed by a polynomial ring,
you evaluate the polynomial in these indexing polynomials.
- `mv_polynomial.bind₂ f φ` with `f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S` and `φ : mv_polynomial σ R`
is the `mv_polynomial σ S` obtained from `φ` by mapping the coefficients of `φ` through `f`
and considering the resulting polynomial as polynomial expression in `mv_polynomial σ R`.
- `mv_polynomial.join₂ φ` with `φ : mv_polynomial σ (mv_polynomial σ R)` collapses `φ` to
a `mv_polynomial σ R`, by considering `φ` as polynomial expression in `mv_polynomial σ R`.
These operations themselves have algebraic structure: `mv_polynomial.bind₁`
and `mv_polynomial.join₁` are algebra homs and
`mv_polynomial.bind₂` and `mv_polynomial.join₂` are ring homs.
They interact in convenient ways with `mv_polynomial.rename`, `mv_polynomial.map`,
`mv_polynomial.vars`, and other polynomial operations.
Indeed, `mv_polynomial.rename` is the "map" operation for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair,
whereas `mv_polynomial.map` is the "map" operation for the other pair.
## Implementation notes
We add an `is_lawful_monad` instance for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair.
The second pair cannot be instantiated as a `monad`,
since it is not a monad in `Type` but in `CommRing` (or rather `CommSemiRing`).
-/
open_locale big_operators
noncomputable theory
namespace mv_polynomial
open finsupp
variables {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*}
variables {R S T : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [comm_semiring T]
/--
`bind₁` is the "left hand side" bind operation on `mv_polynomial`, operating on the variable type.
Given a polynomial `p : mv_polynomial σ R` and a map `f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R` taking variables
in `p` to polynomials in the variable type `τ`, `bind₁ f p` replaces each variable in `p` with
its value under `f`, producing a new polynomial in `τ`. The coefficient type remains the same.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def bind₁ (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) : mv_polynomial σ R →ₐ[R] mv_polynomial τ R :=
aeval f
/--
`bind₂` is the "right hand side" bind operation on `mv_polynomial`, operating on the coefficient type.
Given a polynomial `p : mv_polynomial σ R` and a map `f : R → mv_polynomial σ S` taking coefficients
in `p` to polynomials over a new ring `S`, `bind₂ f p` replaces each coefficient in `p` with its
value under `f`, producing a new polynomial over `S`. The variable type remains the same.
This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def bind₂ (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) : mv_polynomial σ R →+* mv_polynomial σ S :=
eval₂_hom f X
/--
`join₁` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `mv_polynomial.bind₁`. Given a polynomial `p`
with coefficients in `R` whose variables are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₁ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def join₁ : mv_polynomial (mv_polynomial σ R) R →ₐ[R] mv_polynomial σ R :=
aeval id
/--
`join₂` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `mv_polynomial.bind₂`. Given a polynomial `p`
with variables in `σ` whose coefficients are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₂ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def join₂ : mv_polynomial σ (mv_polynomial σ R) →+* mv_polynomial σ R :=
eval₂_hom (ring_hom.id _) X
@[simp] lemma aeval_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) :
aeval f = bind₁ f := rfl
@[simp] lemma eval₂_hom_C_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) :
eval₂_hom C f = bind₁ f := rfl
@[simp] lemma eval₂_hom_eq_bind₂ (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) :
eval₂_hom f X = bind₂ f := rfl
section
variables (σ R)
@[simp] lemma aeval_id_eq_join₁ :
aeval id = @join₁ σ R _ := rfl
lemma eval₂_hom_C_id_eq_join₁ (φ : mv_polynomial (mv_polynomial σ R) R) :
eval₂_hom C id φ = join₁ φ := rfl
@[simp] lemma eval₂_hom_id_X_eq_join₂ :
eval₂_hom (ring_hom.id _) X = @join₂ σ R _ := rfl
end
-- In this file, we don't want to use these simp lemmas,
-- because we first need to show how these new definitions interact
-- and the proofs fall back on unfolding the definitions and call simp afterwards
local attribute [-simp] aeval_eq_bind₁ eval₂_hom_C_eq_bind₁ eval₂_hom_eq_bind₂
aeval_id_eq_join₁ eval₂_hom_id_X_eq_join₂
@[simp]
lemma bind₁_X_right (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (i : σ) : bind₁ f (X i) = f i :=
aeval_X f i
@[simp]
lemma bind₂_X_right (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (i : σ) : bind₂ f (X i) = X i :=
eval₂_hom_X' f X i
@[simp]
lemma bind₁_X_left : bind₁ (X : σ → mv_polynomial σ R) = alg_hom.id R _ :=
by { ext1 i, simp }
lemma aeval_X_left : aeval (X : σ → mv_polynomial σ R) = alg_hom.id R _ :=
by rw [aeval_eq_bind₁, bind₁_X_left]
lemma aeval_X_left_apply (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) : aeval X φ = φ :=
by rw [aeval_eq_bind₁, bind₁_X_left, alg_hom.id_apply]
variable (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R)
@[simp]
lemma bind₁_C_right (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (x) : bind₁ f (C x) = C x :=
by simp [bind₁, C, aeval_monomial, finsupp.prod_zero_index]; refl
@[simp]
lemma bind₂_C_right (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (r : R) : bind₂ f (C r) = f r :=
eval₂_hom_C f X r
@[simp]
lemma bind₂_C_left : bind₂ (C : R →+* mv_polynomial σ R) = ring_hom.id _ :=
by { ext1; simp }
@[simp]
lemma bind₂_comp_C (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) :
(bind₂ f).comp C = f :=
ring_hom.ext $ bind₂_C_right _
@[simp]
lemma join₂_map (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
join₂ (map f φ) = bind₂ f φ :=
by simp only [join₂, bind₂, eval₂_hom_map_hom, ring_hom.id_comp]
@[simp]
lemma join₂_comp_map (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) :
join₂.comp (map f) = bind₂ f :=
ring_hom.ext $ join₂_map _
lemma aeval_id_rename (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (p : mv_polynomial σ R) :
aeval id (rename f p) = aeval f p :=
by rw [aeval_rename, function.comp.left_id]
@[simp]
lemma join₁_rename (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
join₁ (rename f φ) = bind₁ f φ :=
aeval_id_rename _ _
@[simp]
lemma bind₁_id : bind₁ (@id (mv_polynomial σ R)) = join₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma bind₂_id : bind₂ (ring_hom.id (mv_polynomial σ R)) = join₂ := rfl
lemma bind₁_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (g : τ → mv_polynomial υ R)
(φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
(bind₁ g) (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (λ i, bind₁ g (f i)) φ :=
by simp [bind₁, ← comp_aeval]
lemma bind₁_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (g : τ → mv_polynomial υ R) :
(bind₁ g).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ (λ i, bind₁ g (f i)) :=
by { ext1, apply bind₁_bind₁ }
lemma bind₂_comp_bind₂ (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (g : S →+* mv_polynomial σ T) :
(bind₂ g).comp (bind₂ f) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) :=
by { ext1; simp }
lemma bind₂_bind₂ (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (g : S →+* mv_polynomial σ T) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
(bind₂ g) (bind₂ f φ) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) φ :=
ring_hom.congr_fun (bind₂_comp_bind₂ f g) φ
lemma rename_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (g : τ → υ) :
(rename g).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ (λ i, rename g $ f i) :=
by { ext1 i, simp }
lemma rename_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (g : τ → υ) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
rename g (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (λ i, rename g $ f i) φ :=
alg_hom.congr_fun (rename_comp_bind₁ f g) φ
lemma map_bind₂ (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (g : S →+* T) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
map g (bind₂ f φ) = bind₂ ((map g).comp f) φ :=
begin
simp only [bind₂, eval₂_comp_right, coe_eval₂_hom, eval₂_map],
congr' 1 with : 1,
simp only [function.comp_app, map_X]
end
lemma bind₁_comp_rename {υ : Type*} (f : τ → mv_polynomial υ R) (g : σ → τ) :
(bind₁ f).comp (rename g) = bind₁ (f ∘ g) :=
by { ext1 i, simp }
lemma bind₁_rename {υ : Type*} (f : τ → mv_polynomial υ R) (g : σ → τ) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
bind₁ f (rename g φ) = bind₁ (f ∘ g) φ :=
alg_hom.congr_fun (bind₁_comp_rename f g) φ
lemma bind₂_map (f : S →+* mv_polynomial σ T) (g : R →+* S) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
bind₂ f (map g φ) = bind₂ (f.comp g) φ :=
by simp [bind₂]
@[simp]
lemma map_comp_C (f : R →+* S) : (map f).comp (C : R →+* mv_polynomial σ R) = C.comp f :=
by { ext1, apply map_C }
-- mixing the two monad structures
lemma hom_bind₁ (f : mv_polynomial τ R →+* S) (g : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
f (bind₁ g φ) = eval₂_hom (f.comp C) (λ i, f (g i)) φ :=
by rw [bind₁, map_aeval, algebra_map_eq]
lemma map_bind₁ (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
map f (bind₁ g φ) = bind₁ (λ (i : σ), (map f) (g i)) (map f φ) :=
by { rw [hom_bind₁, map_comp_C, ← eval₂_hom_map_hom], refl }
@[simp]
lemma eval₂_hom_comp_C (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → S) :
(eval₂_hom f g).comp C = f :=
by { ext1 r, exact eval₂_C f g r }
lemma eval₂_hom_bind₁ (f : R →+* S) (g : τ → S) (h : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
eval₂_hom f g (bind₁ h φ) = eval₂_hom f (λ i, eval₂_hom f g (h i)) φ :=
by rw [hom_bind₁, eval₂_hom_comp_C]
lemma aeval_bind₁ [algebra R S] (f : τ → S) (g : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
aeval f (bind₁ g φ) = aeval (λ i, aeval f (g i)) φ :=
eval₂_hom_bind₁ _ _ _ _
lemma aeval_comp_bind₁ [algebra R S] (f : τ → S) (g : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) :
(aeval f).comp (bind₁ g) = aeval (λ i, aeval f (g i)) :=
by { ext1, apply aeval_bind₁ }
lemma eval₂_hom_comp_bind₂ (f : S →+* T) (g : σ → T) (h : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) :
(eval₂_hom f g).comp (bind₂ h) = eval₂_hom ((eval₂_hom f g).comp h) g :=
by { ext1; simp }
lemma eval₂_hom_bind₂ (f : S →+* T) (g : σ → T) (h : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
eval₂_hom f g (bind₂ h φ) = eval₂_hom ((eval₂_hom f g).comp h) g φ :=
ring_hom.congr_fun (eval₂_hom_comp_bind₂ f g h) φ
lemma aeval_bind₂ [algebra S T] (f : σ → T) (g : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
aeval f (bind₂ g φ) = eval₂_hom ((@aeval S T σ _ f _ _ : mv_polynomial σ S →+* T).comp g) f φ :=
eval₂_hom_bind₂ _ _ _ _
lemma eval₂_hom_C_left (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) : eval₂_hom C f = bind₁ f := rfl
lemma bind₁_monomial (f : σ → mv_polynomial τ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
bind₁ f (monomial d r) = C r * ∏ i in d.support, f i ^ d i :=
by simp only [monomial_eq, alg_hom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right, finsupp.prod,
alg_hom.map_prod, alg_hom.map_pow, bind₁_X_right]
lemma bind₂_monomial (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
bind₂ f (monomial d r) = f r * monomial d 1 :=
by simp only [monomial_eq, ring_hom.map_mul, bind₂_C_right, finsupp.prod,
ring_hom.map_prod, ring_hom.map_pow, bind₂_X_right, C_1, one_mul]
@[simp]
lemma bind₂_monomial_one (f : R →+* mv_polynomial σ S) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
bind₂ f (monomial d 1) = monomial d 1 :=
by rw [bind₂_monomial, f.map_one, one_mul]
instance monad : monad (λ σ, mv_polynomial σ R) :=
{ map := λ α β f p, rename f p,
pure := λ _, X,
bind := λ _ _ p f, bind₁ f p }
instance is_lawful_functor : is_lawful_functor (λ σ, mv_polynomial σ R) :=
{ id_map := by intros; simp [(<$>)],
comp_map := by intros; simp [(<$>)] }
instance is_lawful_monad : is_lawful_monad (λ σ, mv_polynomial σ R) :=
{ pure_bind := by intros; simp [pure, bind],
bind_assoc := by intros; simp [bind, ← bind₁_comp_bind₁] }
/-
Possible TODO for the future:
Enable the following definitions, and write a lot of supporting lemmas.
def bind (f : R →+* mv_polynomial τ S) (g : σ → mv_polynomial τ S) :
mv_polynomial σ R →+* mv_polynomial τ S :=
eval₂_hom f g
def join (f : R →+* S) : mv_polynomial (mv_polynomial σ R) S →ₐ[S] mv_polynomial σ S :=
aeval (map f)
def ajoin [algebra R S] : mv_polynomial (mv_polynomial σ R) S →ₐ[S] mv_polynomial σ S :=
join (algebra_map R S)
-/
end mv_polynomial
|
e7a9cafccd419f355b67ad6dc950df123a45617b | 0d107d7abd6ae235d586830f8e09b1b30e7eef0b | /src/math_limit_2/Solution.lean | 653515db20fcd292b4cb4f11fffc148e5e4d4b55 | [] | no_license | ukikagi/codewars-lean | 6b9a83ebbb159e7eebf8551b745a1c4d450e747f | 1912f2a4e25e917abfce70d65c0469cfac19dc93 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,948,190,244 | 1,603,361,004,000 | 1,603,795,841,000 | 303,746,208 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 423 | lean | import .Preloaded
theorem exercise_1p3 (x y : ℕ → ℝ) (l : ℝ)
(h₁ : ∀ n, abs (x n - l) ≤ y n) (h₂ : lim_to_inf y 0) :
lim_to_inf x l :=
begin
unfold lim_to_inf at *,
intros ε hep,
specialize h₂ ε hep, simp at h₂,
cases h₂ with N H,
use N,
intros n hn,
specialize H n hn,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
exact h₁ n,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
exact le_abs_self (y n),
exact H,
end
|
bb2ed01e52c02a36014a4f95b351a5ac7fda9c79 | 4767244035cdd124e1ce3d0c81128f8929df6163 | /data/list/basic.lean | e25ec6517a555354a80c06f07e5b07c2b74c3839 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 5HT/mathlib | b941fecacd31a9c5dd0abad58770084b8a1e56b1 | 40fa9ade2f5649569639608db5e621e5fad0cc02 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,978,681,358 | 1,546,681,764,000 | 1,546,681,764,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 183,592 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
Basic properties of lists.
-/
import
tactic.interactive tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop tactic.split_ifs
logic.basic logic.function logic.relation
algebra.group order.basic
data.list.defs data.nat.basic data.option.basic
data.bool data.prod data.sigma data.fin
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
@[simp] theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
theorem cons_inj {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
@[simp] theorem cons_inj' (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
⟨λ e, cons_inj e, congr_arg _⟩
/- mem -/
theorem eq_nil_of_forall_not_mem : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a, a ∉ l) → l = nil
| [] := assume h, rfl
| (b :: l') := assume h, absurd (mem_cons_self b l') (h b)
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
classical.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_map_of_inj {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) : b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/- bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_cons' {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ (x : α), x = a ∨ x ∈ l → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_mem_cons']
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
@[simp] theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/- list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_app_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_app_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem app_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
/- append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_foldl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s t : list β) : foldl f a (s ++ t) = foldl f (foldl f a s) t :=
by {induction s with b s H generalizing a, refl, simp only [foldl, cons_append], rw H _}
theorem append_foldr (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (s t : list α) : foldr f a (s ++ t) = foldr f (foldr f a t) s :=
by {induction s with b s H generalizing a, refl, simp only [foldr, cons_append], rw H _}
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'], exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left, exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj : ∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_left h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_right' h rfl
theorem append_left_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
⟨append_left_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem append_right_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨append_right_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/- join -/
attribute [simp] join
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
/- repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n → b = a
| (n+1) h := or.elim h id $ @eq_of_mem_repeat _
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) : b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
/- bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_append {α β} (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
/- concat -/
@[simp] theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by induction l; intro h; contradiction
@[simp] theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [*, cons_append, concat]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by induction l₂ with b l₂ ih; simp only [concat_eq_append, nil_append, cons_append, append_assoc]
/- reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]; refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
injective_of_left_inverse reverse_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff, not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat], λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/- last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : ∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
/- head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) : head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
by {induction l, contradiction, refl}
/- map -/
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_hom (f : α → β) (g : α → γ → α) (g' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (g a x) = g' (f a) x) (l : list γ) : f (foldl g a l) = foldl g' (f a) l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom (f : α → β) (g : γ → α → α) (g' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (g x a) = g' x (f a)) (l : list γ) : f (foldr g a l) = foldr g' (f a) l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
/- map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
/- sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_app_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_app_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem reverse_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_app_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right ih [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by have := reverse_sublist h; simp only [reverse_reverse] at this; assumption, reverse_sublist⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by have := reverse_sublist h; simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff] at this; assumption,
λ h, append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right h l⟩
theorem subset_of_sublist : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (subset_of_sublist s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (subset_of_sublist s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, subset_of_sublist h (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ subset_of_sublist s
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist_antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/- index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp] theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/- nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_ge_len : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, n ≥ length l → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_ge_len (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_ge_len hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m (by rwa list.length_repeat) = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length: ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
@[extensionality]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by rw [nth_ge_len h₁, nth_ge_len (by rwa [← hl])]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b; simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i := by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1); exact
λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ_inj, not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≥ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth]; exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
end insert_nth
/- take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_all : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_all end
theorem take_all_of_ge : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, n ≥ length l → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_ge (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_all (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by simp,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/- foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) : foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/- mfoldl, mfoldr -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/- sum -/
attribute [to_additive list.sum] list.prod
attribute [to_additive list.sum.equations._eqn_1] list.prod.equations._eqn_1
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_nil]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_cons]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_append]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_join]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
end monoid
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_erase]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) : length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
/- lexicographic ordering -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {} {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
instance [decidable_linear_order α] : decidable_linear_order (list α) :=
decidable_linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
/- all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/- map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach {α} (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
/- find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
@[simp] theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/- lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/- filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem filter_map_sublist_filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem map_sublist_map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_map; exact filter_map_sublist_filter_map _ s
/- filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist $ filter_sublist l
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj', ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_filter; exact filter_map_sublist_filter_map _ s
theorem filter_of_map (f : β → α) (l) : filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : ∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : ∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append, take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)]; [simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/- count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append
@[simp] theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, count_append, count_singleton]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp] theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/- prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
@[simp] theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, prefix_append]
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_left_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_left_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_left_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton]; exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t]; exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/- sublists -/
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp only [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists', map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s,
{ simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map],
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ h },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l, length_map,
length, pow_succ, mul_succ, mul_zero, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp only [*, append_assoc]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp only [sublists_aux, foldr_cons], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih, {refl},
simp only [ih, foldr_cons]
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, nil_append, append_nil]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, cons_append, sublists_aux₁_append l₁, append_assoc]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp only [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁, append_assoc, append_nil]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := rfl
| (a::l) f g := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, bind_append, sublists_aux₁_bind l]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux₁_append, bind_eq_bind, sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, apply congr_arg _,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], exact (append_nil _).symm
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp only [map, sublists, sublists_aux_cons_append, map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind,
cons_bind, map_id', append_nil, cons_append, map_id' (λ _, rfl)]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_bind, cons_bind, cons_bind, nil_bind,
map_eq_map, map_eq_map, map_id' (append_nil), append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [refl,
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind, map_map, cons_bind, append_nil, nil_bind, (∘)]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id' (reverse_reverse)]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro, {rwa foldr},
simp only [foldr, mem_cons_iff, false_or, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_inj reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2 $ singleton_sublist.2 $
mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by refl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/- forall₂ -/
section forall₂
variables {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
open relator relation
run_cmd tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop `list.forall₂ `list.forall₂_iff
@[simp] theorem forall₂_cons {R : α → β → Prop} {a b l₁ l₂} :
forall₂ R (a::l₁) (b::l₂) ↔ R a b ∧ forall₂ R l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with h₁ h₂; split; assumption, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, forall₂.cons h₁ h₂⟩
theorem forall₂.imp {R S : α → β → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {l₁ l₂}
(h : forall₂ R l₁ l₂) : forall₂ S l₁ l₂ :=
by induction h; constructor; solve_by_elim
lemma forall₂.mp {r q s : α → β → Prop} (h : ∀a b, r a b → q a b → s a b) :
∀{l₁ l₂}, forall₂ r l₁ l₂ → forall₂ q l₁ l₂ → forall₂ s l₁ l₂
| [] [] forall₂.nil forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) (forall₂.cons hr hrs) (forall₂.cons hq hqs) :=
forall₂.cons (h a b hr hq) (forall₂.mp hrs hqs)
lemma forall₂.flip : ∀{a b}, forall₂ (flip r) b a → forall₂ r a b
| _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := forall₂.cons h₁ h₂.flip
lemma forall₂_same {r : α → α → Prop} : ∀{l}, (∀x∈l, r x x) → forall₂ r l l
| [] _ := forall₂.nil
| (a::as) h := forall₂.cons
(h _ (mem_cons_self _ _))
(forall₂_same $ assume a ha, h a $ mem_cons_of_mem _ ha)
lemma forall₂_refl {r} [is_refl α r] (l : list α) : forall₂ r l l :=
forall₂_same $ assume a h, is_refl.refl _ _
lemma forall₂_eq_eq_eq : forall₂ ((=) : α → α → Prop) = (=) :=
begin
funext a b, apply propext,
split,
{ assume h, induction h, {refl}, simp only [*]; split; refl },
{ assume h, subst h, exact forall₂_refl _ }
end
@[simp] lemma forall₂_nil_left_iff {l} : forall₂ r nil l ↔ l = nil :=
⟨λ H, by cases H; refl, by rintro rfl; exact forall₂.nil⟩
@[simp] lemma forall₂_nil_right_iff {l} : forall₂ r l nil ↔ l = nil :=
⟨λ H, by cases H; refl, by rintro rfl; exact forall₂.nil⟩
lemma forall₂_cons_left_iff {a l u} : forall₂ r (a::l) u ↔ (∃b u', r a b ∧ forall₂ r l u' ∧ u = b :: u') :=
iff.intro
(assume h, match u, h with (b :: u'), forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ := ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ end)
(assume h, match u, h with _, ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ end)
lemma forall₂_cons_right_iff {b l u} :
forall₂ r u (b::l) ↔ (∃a u', r a b ∧ forall₂ r u' l ∧ u = a :: u') :=
iff.intro
(assume h, match u, h with (b :: u'), forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ := ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ end)
(assume h, match u, h with _, ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ end)
lemma forall₂_and_left {r : α → β → Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
∀l u, forall₂ (λa b, p a ∧ r a b) l u ↔ (∀a∈l, p a) ∧ forall₂ r l u
| [] u := by simp only [forall₂_nil_left_iff, forall_prop_of_false (not_mem_nil _), imp_true_iff, true_and]
| (a::l) u := by simp only [forall₂_and_left l, forall₂_cons_left_iff, forall_mem_cons,
and_assoc, and_comm, and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left.symm]
@[simp] lemma forall₂_map_left_iff {f : γ → α} :
∀{l u}, forall₂ r (map f l) u ↔ forall₂ (λc b, r (f c) b) l u
| [] _ := by simp only [map, forall₂_nil_left_iff]
| (a::l) _ := by simp only [map, forall₂_cons_left_iff, forall₂_map_left_iff]
@[simp] lemma forall₂_map_right_iff {f : γ → β} :
∀{l u}, forall₂ r l (map f u) ↔ forall₂ (λa c, r a (f c)) l u
| _ [] := by simp only [map, forall₂_nil_right_iff]
| _ (b::u) := by simp only [map, forall₂_cons_right_iff, forall₂_map_right_iff]
lemma left_unique_forall₂ (hr : left_unique r) : left_unique (forall₂ r)
| a₀ nil a₁ forall₂.nil forall₂.nil := rfl
| (a₀::l₀) (b::l) (a₁::l₁) (forall₂.cons ha₀ h₀) (forall₂.cons ha₁ h₁) :=
hr ha₀ ha₁ ▸ left_unique_forall₂ h₀ h₁ ▸ rfl
lemma right_unique_forall₂ (hr : right_unique r) : right_unique (forall₂ r)
| nil a₀ a₁ forall₂.nil forall₂.nil := rfl
| (b::l) (a₀::l₀) (a₁::l₁) (forall₂.cons ha₀ h₀) (forall₂.cons ha₁ h₁) :=
hr ha₀ ha₁ ▸ right_unique_forall₂ h₀ h₁ ▸ rfl
lemma bi_unique_forall₂ (hr : bi_unique r) : bi_unique (forall₂ r) :=
⟨assume a b c, left_unique_forall₂ hr.1, assume a b c, right_unique_forall₂ hr.2⟩
theorem forall₂_length_eq {R : α → β → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ l₂}, forall₂ R l₁ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂
| _ _ forall₂.nil := rfl
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := congr_arg succ (forall₂_length_eq h₂)
theorem forall₂_zip {R : α → β → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ l₂}, forall₂ R l₁ l₂ → ∀ {a b}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → R a b
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) x y (or.inl rfl) := h₁
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) x y (or.inr h₃) := forall₂_zip h₂ h₃
theorem forall₂_iff_zip {R : α → β → Prop} {l₁ l₂} : forall₂ R l₁ l₂ ↔
length l₁ = length l₂ ∧ ∀ {a b}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → R a b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨forall₂_length_eq h, @forall₂_zip _ _ _ _ _ h⟩,
λ h, begin
cases h with h₁ h₂,
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂,
{ cases length_eq_zero.1 h₁.symm, constructor },
{ cases l₂ with b l₂; injection h₁ with h₁,
exact forall₂.cons (h₂ $ or.inl rfl) (IH h₁ $ λ a b h, h₂ $ or.inr h) }
end⟩
theorem forall₂_take {R : α → β → Prop} :
∀ n {l₁ l₂}, forall₂ R l₁ l₂ → forall₂ R (take n l₁) (take n l₂)
| 0 _ _ _ := by simp only [forall₂.nil, take]
| (n+1) _ _ (forall₂.nil) := by simp only [forall₂.nil, take]
| (n+1) _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := by simp [and.intro h₁ h₂, forall₂_take n]
theorem forall₂_drop {R : α → β → Prop} :
∀ n {l₁ l₂}, forall₂ R l₁ l₂ → forall₂ R (drop n l₁) (drop n l₂)
| 0 _ _ h := by simp only [drop, h]
| (n+1) _ _ (forall₂.nil) := by simp only [forall₂.nil, drop]
| (n+1) _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := by simp [and.intro h₁ h₂, forall₂_drop n]
theorem forall₂_take_append {R : α → β → Prop} (l : list α) (l₁ : list β) (l₂ : list β)
(h : forall₂ R l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : forall₂ R (list.take (length l₁) l) l₁ :=
have h': forall₂ R (take (length l₁) l) (take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂)), from forall₂_take (length l₁) h,
by rwa [take_left] at h'
theorem forall₂_drop_append {R : α → β → Prop} (l : list α) (l₁ : list β) (l₂ : list β)
(h : forall₂ R l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : forall₂ R (list.drop (length l₁) l) l₂ :=
have h': forall₂ R (drop (length l₁) l) (drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂)), from forall₂_drop (length l₁) h,
by rwa [drop_left] at h'
lemma rel_mem (hr : bi_unique r) : (r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ iff) (∈) (∈)
| a b h [] [] forall₂.nil := by simp only [not_mem_nil]
| a b h (a'::as) (b'::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := rel_or (rel_eq hr h h₁) (rel_mem h h₂)
lemma rel_map : ((r ⇒ p) ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ p) map map
| f g h [] [] forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| f g h (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := forall₂.cons (h h₁) (rel_map @h h₂)
lemma rel_append : (forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r) append append
| [] [] h l₁ l₂ hl := hl
| (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) l₁ l₂ hl := forall₂.cons h₁ (rel_append h₂ hl)
lemma rel_join : (forall₂ (forall₂ r) ⇒ forall₂ r) join join
| [] [] forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := rel_append h₁ (rel_join h₂)
lemma rel_bind : (forall₂ r ⇒ (r ⇒ forall₂ p) ⇒ forall₂ p) list.bind list.bind :=
assume a b h₁ f g h₂, rel_join (rel_map @h₂ h₁)
lemma rel_foldl : ((p ⇒ r ⇒ p) ⇒ p ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ p) foldl foldl
| f g hfg _ _ h _ _ forall₂.nil := h
| f g hfg x y hxy _ _ (forall₂.cons hab hs) := rel_foldl @hfg (hfg hxy hab) hs
lemma rel_foldr : ((r ⇒ p ⇒ p) ⇒ p ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ p) foldr foldr
| f g hfg _ _ h _ _ forall₂.nil := h
| f g hfg x y hxy _ _ (forall₂.cons hab hs) := hfg hab (rel_foldr @hfg hxy hs)
lemma rel_filter {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
(hpq : (r ⇒ (↔)) p q) :
(forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r) (filter p) (filter q)
| _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) :=
begin
by_cases p a,
{ have : q b, { rwa [← hpq h₁] },
simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, filter_cons_of_pos _ this, forall₂_cons, h₁, rel_filter h₂, and_true], },
{ have : ¬ q b, { rwa [← hpq h₁] },
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ h, filter_cons_of_neg _ this, rel_filter h₂], },
end
theorem filter_map_cons (f : α → option β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = option.cases_on (f a) (filter_map f l) (λb, b :: filter_map f l) :=
begin
generalize eq : f a = b,
cases b,
{ rw filter_map_cons_none _ _ eq },
{ rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ eq },
end
lemma rel_filter_map {f : α → option γ} {q : β → option δ} :
((r ⇒ option.rel p) ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ p) filter_map filter_map
| f g hfg _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| f g hfg (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) :=
by rw [filter_map_cons, filter_map_cons];
from match f a, g b, hfg h₁ with
| _, _, option.rel.none := rel_filter_map @hfg h₂
| _, _, option.rel.some h := forall₂.cons h (rel_filter_map @hfg h₂)
end
@[to_additive list.rel_sum]
lemma rel_prod [monoid α] [monoid β]
(h : r 1 1) (hf : (r ⇒ r ⇒ r) (*) (*)) : (forall₂ r ⇒ r) prod prod :=
assume a b, rel_foldl (assume a b, hf) h
end forall₂
/- sections -/
theorem mem_sections {L : list (list α)} {f} : f ∈ sections L ↔ forall₂ (∈) f L :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ induction L generalizing f, {cases mem_singleton.1 h, exact forall₂.nil},
simp only [sections, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind, mem_map] at h,
rcases h with ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩,
simp only [*, forall₂_cons, true_and] },
{ induction h with a l f L al fL fs, {exact or.inl rfl},
simp only [sections, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind, mem_map],
exact ⟨_, fs, _, al, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_sections_length {L : list (list α)} {f} (h : f ∈ sections L) : length f = length L :=
forall₂_length_eq (mem_sections.1 h)
lemma rel_sections {r : α → β → Prop} : (forall₂ (forall₂ r) ⇒ forall₂ (forall₂ r)) sections sections
| _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.cons forall₂.nil forall₂.nil
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₀ h₁) :=
rel_bind (rel_sections h₁) (assume _ _ hl, rel_map (assume _ _ ha, forall₂.cons ha hl) h₀)
/- permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/- insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp] theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/- erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) : (a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right : ∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist (erasep_sublist l)
theorem erasep_sublist_erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/- erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : (b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) : (b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp] theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist (erase_sublist a l)
theorem erase_sublist_erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_sublist_erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
end erase
/- diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
subset_of_sublist $ diff_sublist _ _
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem diff_sublist_of_sublist : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, diff_sublist_of_sublist (erase_sublist_erase _ h)]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons, erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (erase_sublist_erase b h)
end diff
/- zip & unzip -/
@[simp] theorem zip_cons_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip (a :: l₁) (b :: l₂) = (a, b) :: zip l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_left (l : list α) : zip ([] : list β) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_right (l : list α) : zip l ([] : list β) = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_swap : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
(zip l₁ l₂).map prod.swap = zip l₂ l₁
| [] l₂ := (zip_nil_right _).symm
| l₁ [] := by rw zip_nil_right; refl
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := by simp only [zip_cons_cons, map_cons, zip_swap l₁ l₂, prod.swap_prod_mk]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem length_zip : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
length (zip l₁ l₂) = min (length l₁) (length l₂)
| [] l₂ := rfl
| l₁ [] := by simp only [length, zip_nil_right, min_zero]
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := by by simp only [length, zip_cons_cons, length_zip l₁ l₂, min_add_add_right]
theorem zip_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α} (h : length l₁ = length l₂),
zip (l₁ ++ r₁) (l₂ ++ r₂) = zip l₁ l₂ ++ zip r₁ r₂
| [] l₂ r₁ r₂ h := by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h.symm]; refl
| l₁ [] r₁ r₂ h := by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h]; refl
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) r₁ r₂ h := by simp only [cons_append, zip_cons_cons, zip_append (succ_inj h)]; split; refl
theorem zip_map (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
zip (l₁.map f) (l₂.map g) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (prod.map f g)
| [] l₂ := rfl
| l₁ [] := by simp only [map, zip_nil_right]
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map l₁ l₂, prod.map]; split; refl
theorem zip_map_left (f : α → γ) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip (l₁.map f) l₂ = (zip l₁ l₂).map (prod.map f id) :=
by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
theorem zip_map_right (f : β → γ) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip l₁ (l₂.map f) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (prod.map id f) :=
by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
theorem zip_map' (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) : ∀ (l : list α),
zip (l.map f) (l.map g) = l.map (λ a, (f a, g a))
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map' l]; split; refl
theorem mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β},
(a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
| (_::l₁) (_::l₂) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨or.inl rfl, or.inl rfl⟩
| (a'::l₁) (b'::l₂) (or.inr h) := by split; simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_true, mem_zip h]
@[simp] theorem unzip_nil : unzip (@nil (α × β)) = ([], []) := rfl
@[simp] theorem unzip_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l : list (α × β)) :
unzip ((a, b) :: l) = (a :: (unzip l).1, b :: (unzip l).2) :=
by rw unzip; cases unzip l; refl
theorem unzip_eq_map : ∀ (l : list (α × β)), unzip l = (l.map prod.fst, l.map prod.snd)
| [] := rfl
| ((a, b) :: l) := by simp only [unzip_cons, map_cons, unzip_eq_map l]
theorem unzip_left (l : list (α × β)) : (unzip l).1 = l.map prod.fst :=
by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
theorem unzip_right (l : list (α × β)) : (unzip l).2 = l.map prod.snd :=
by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
theorem unzip_swap (l : list (α × β)) : unzip (l.map prod.swap) = (unzip l).swap :=
by simp only [unzip_eq_map, map_map]; split; refl
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ (l : list (α × β)), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
| [] := rfl
| ((a, b) :: l) := by simp only [unzip_cons, zip_cons_cons, zip_unzip l]; split; refl
theorem unzip_zip_left : ∀ {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β}, length l₁ ≤ length l₂ →
(unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).1 = l₁
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| l₁ [] h := by rw eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (eq_zero_of_le_zero h); refl
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) h := by simp only [zip_cons_cons, unzip_cons, unzip_zip_left (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]; split; refl
theorem unzip_zip_right {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
(unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).2 = l₂ :=
by rw [← zip_swap, unzip_swap]; exact unzip_zip_left h
theorem unzip_zip {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (h : length l₁ = length l₂) :
unzip (zip l₁ l₂) = (l₁, l₂) :=
by rw [← @prod.mk.eta _ _ (unzip (zip l₁ l₂)),
unzip_zip_left (le_of_eq h), unzip_zip_right (ge_of_eq h)]
@[simp] theorem length_revzip (l : list α) : length (revzip l) = length l :=
by simp only [revzip, length_zip, length_reverse, min_self]
@[simp] theorem unzip_revzip (l : list α) : (revzip l).unzip = (l, l.reverse) :=
unzip_zip (length_reverse l).symm
@[simp] theorem revzip_map_fst (l : list α) : (revzip l).map prod.fst = l :=
by rw [← unzip_left, unzip_revzip]
@[simp] theorem revzip_map_snd (l : list α) : (revzip l).map prod.snd = l.reverse :=
by rw [← unzip_right, unzip_revzip]
theorem reverse_revzip (l : list α) : reverse l.revzip = revzip l.reverse :=
by rw [← zip_unzip.{u u} (revzip l).reverse, unzip_eq_map]; simp; simp [revzip]
theorem revzip_swap (l : list α) : (revzip l).map prod.swap = revzip l.reverse :=
by simp [revzip]
/- enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
/- product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/- sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/- of_fn -/
theorem length_of_fn_aux {n} (f : fin n → α) :
∀ m h l, length (of_fn_aux f m h l) = length l + m
| 0 h l := rfl
| (succ m) h l := (length_of_fn_aux m _ _).trans (succ_add _ _)
@[simp] theorem length_of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) : length (of_fn f) = n :=
(length_of_fn_aux f _ _ _).trans (zero_add _)
theorem nth_of_fn_aux {n} (f : fin n → α) (i) :
∀ m h l,
(∀ i, nth l i = of_fn_nth_val f (i + m)) →
nth (of_fn_aux f m h l) i = of_fn_nth_val f i
| 0 h l H := H i
| (succ m) h l H := nth_of_fn_aux m _ _ begin
intro j, cases j with j,
{ simp only [nth, of_fn_nth_val, zero_add, dif_pos (show m < n, from h)] },
{ simp only [nth, H, succ_add] }
end
@[simp] theorem nth_of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) (i) :
nth (of_fn f) i = of_fn_nth_val f i :=
nth_of_fn_aux f _ _ _ _ $ λ i,
by simp only [of_fn_nth_val, dif_neg (not_lt.2 (le_add_left n i))]; refl
@[simp] theorem nth_le_of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) (i : fin n) :
nth_le (of_fn f) i.1 ((length_of_fn f).symm ▸ i.2) = f i :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth];
simp only [list.nth_of_fn, of_fn_nth_val, fin.eta, dif_pos i.2]
theorem array_eq_of_fn {n} (a : array n α) : a.to_list = of_fn a.read :=
suffices ∀ {m h l}, d_array.rev_iterate_aux a
(λ i, cons) m h l = of_fn_aux (d_array.read a) m h l, from this,
begin
intros, induction m with m IH generalizing l, {refl},
simp only [d_array.rev_iterate_aux, of_fn_aux, IH]
end
theorem of_fn_zero (f : fin 0 → α) : of_fn f = [] := rfl
theorem of_fn_succ {n} (f : fin (succ n) → α) :
of_fn f = f 0 :: of_fn (λ i, f i.succ) :=
suffices ∀ {m h l}, of_fn_aux f (succ m) (succ_le_succ h) l =
f 0 :: of_fn_aux (λ i, f i.succ) m h l, from this,
begin
intros, induction m with m IH generalizing l, {refl},
rw [of_fn_aux, IH], refl
end
theorem of_fn_nth_le : ∀ l : list α, of_fn (λ i, nth_le l i.1 i.2) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw of_fn_succ; congr; simp only [fin.succ_val]; exact of_fn_nth_le l
/- disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
@[simp] theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
end disjoint
/- union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff, mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h]; split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/- inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
end inter
/- bag_inter -/
section bag_inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_bag_inter (l : list α) : [].bag_inter l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem bag_inter_nil (l : list α) : l.bag_inter [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem cons_bag_inter_of_pos {a} (l₁ : list α) {l₂} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bag_inter l₂ = a :: l₁.bag_inter (l₂.erase a) :=
by cases l₂; exact if_pos h
@[simp] theorem cons_bag_inter_of_neg {a} (l₁ : list α) {l₂} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bag_inter l₂ = l₁.bag_inter l₂ :=
begin
cases l₂, {simp only [bag_inter_nil]},
simp only [erase_of_not_mem h, list.bag_inter, if_neg h]
end
theorem mem_bag_inter {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁.bag_inter l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂
| [] l₂ := by simp only [nil_bag_inter, not_mem_nil, false_and]
| (b::l₁) l₂ := begin
by_cases b ∈ l₂,
{ rw [cons_bag_inter_of_pos _ h, mem_cons_iff, mem_cons_iff, mem_bag_inter],
by_cases ba : a = b,
{ simp only [ba, h, eq_self_iff_true, true_or, true_and] },
{ simp only [mem_erase_of_ne ba, ba, false_or] } },
{ rw [cons_bag_inter_of_neg _ h, mem_bag_inter, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right],
symmetry, apply or_iff_right_of_imp,
rintro ⟨rfl, h'⟩, exact h.elim h' }
end
theorem bag_inter_sublist_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.bag_inter l₂ <+ l₁
| [] l₂ := by simp [nil_sublist]
| (b::l₁) l₂ := begin
by_cases b ∈ l₂; simp [h],
{ apply cons_sublist_cons, apply bag_inter_sublist_left },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist, apply bag_inter_sublist_left }
end
end bag_inter
/- pairwise relation (generalized no duplicate) -/
section pairwise
run_cmd tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop `list.pairwise `list.pairwise_iff
variable {R : α → α → Prop}
theorem rel_of_pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R (a::l)) : ∀ {a'}, a' ∈ l → R a a' :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).1
theorem pairwise_of_pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R (a::l)) : pairwise R l :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).2
theorem pairwise.imp_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → R a b → S a b) (p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S l :=
begin
induction p with a l r p IH generalizing H; constructor,
{ exact ball.imp_right
(λ x h, H (mem_cons_self _ _) (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)) r },
{ exact IH (λ a b m m', H
(mem_cons_of_mem _ m) (mem_cons_of_mem _ m')) }
end
theorem pairwise.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {l : list α} : pairwise R l → pairwise S l :=
pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b _ _, H a b)
theorem pairwise.and {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α} :
pairwise (λ a b, R a b ∧ S a b) l ↔ pairwise R l ∧ pairwise S l :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.imp (λ a b h, h.1), h.imp (λ a b h, h.2)⟩,
λ ⟨hR, hS⟩, begin
clear_, induction hR with a l R1 R2 IH;
simp only [pairwise.nil, pairwise_cons] at *,
exact ⟨λ b bl, ⟨R1 b bl, hS.1 b bl⟩, IH hS.2⟩
end⟩
theorem pairwise.imp₂ {S : α → α → Prop} {T : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b → T a b) {l : list α}
(hR : pairwise R l) (hS : pairwise S l) : pairwise T l :=
(pairwise.and.2 ⟨hR, hS⟩).imp $ λ a b, and.rec (H a b)
theorem pairwise.iff_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → (R a b ↔ S a b)) : pairwise R l ↔ pairwise S l :=
⟨pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b m m', (H m m').1),
pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b m m', (H m m').2)⟩
theorem pairwise.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {l : list α} : pairwise R l ↔ pairwise S l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (λ a b _ _, H a b)
theorem pairwise_of_forall {l : list α} (H : ∀ x y, R x y) : pairwise R l :=
by induction l; [exact pairwise.nil,
simp only [*, pairwise_cons, forall_2_true_iff, and_true]]
theorem pairwise.and_mem {l : list α} :
pairwise R l ↔ pairwise (λ x y, x ∈ l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (by simp only [true_and, iff_self, forall_2_true_iff] {contextual := tt})
theorem pairwise.imp_mem {l : list α} :
pairwise R l ↔ pairwise (λ x y, x ∈ l → y ∈ l → R x y) l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (by simp only [forall_prop_of_true, iff_self, forall_2_true_iff] {contextual := tt})
theorem pairwise_of_sublist : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → pairwise R l₂ → pairwise R l₁
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) (pairwise.cons i n) := pairwise_of_sublist s n
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) (pairwise.cons i n) :=
(pairwise_of_sublist s n).cons (ball.imp_left (subset_of_sublist s) i)
theorem forall_of_forall_of_pairwise (H : symmetric R)
{l : list α} (H₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, R x x) (H₂ : pairwise R l) :
∀ (x ∈ l) (y ∈ l), R x y :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, { exact forall_mem_nil _ },
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H₁ with H₁₁ H₁₂,
cases pairwise_cons.1 H₂ with H₂₁ H₂₂,
rintro x (rfl | hx) y (rfl | hy),
exacts [H₁₁, H₂₁ _ hy, H (H₂₁ _ hx), IH H₁₂ H₂₂ _ hx _ hy]
end
theorem pairwise_singleton (R) (a : α) : pairwise R [a] :=
by simp only [pairwise_cons, mem_singleton, forall_prop_of_false (not_mem_nil _), forall_true_iff, pairwise.nil, and_true]
theorem pairwise_pair {a b : α} : pairwise R [a, b] ↔ R a b :=
by simp only [pairwise_cons, mem_singleton, forall_eq, forall_prop_of_false (not_mem_nil _), forall_true_iff, pairwise.nil, and_true]
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : pairwise R (l₁++l₂) ↔
pairwise R l₁ ∧ pairwise R l₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ l₁, ∀ y ∈ l₂, R x y :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [simp only [list.pairwise.nil, forall_prop_of_false (not_mem_nil _), forall_true_iff, and_true, true_and, nil_append],
simp only [cons_append, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_append, IH, forall_mem_cons, forall_and_distrib, and_assoc, and.left_comm]]
theorem pairwise_app_comm (s : symmetric R) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
pairwise R (l₁++l₂) ↔ pairwise R (l₂++l₁) :=
have ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α,
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₁ → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ l₂ → R x y) →
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₂ → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ l₁ → R x y),
from λ l₁ l₂ a x xm y ym, s (a y ym x xm),
by simp only [pairwise_append, and.left_comm]; rw iff.intro (this l₁ l₂) (this l₂ l₁)
theorem pairwise_middle (s : symmetric R) {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
pairwise R (l₁ ++ a::l₂) ↔ pairwise R (a::(l₁++l₂)) :=
show pairwise R (l₁ ++ ([a] ++ l₂)) ↔ pairwise R ([a] ++ l₁ ++ l₂),
by rw [← append_assoc, pairwise_append, @pairwise_append _ _ ([a] ++ l₁), pairwise_app_comm s];
simp only [mem_append, or_comm]
theorem pairwise_map (f : β → α) :
∀ {l : list β}, pairwise R (map f l) ↔ pairwise (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) l
| [] := by simp only [map, pairwise.nil]
| (b::l) :=
have (∀ a b', b' ∈ l → f b' = a → R (f b) a) ↔ ∀ (b' : β), b' ∈ l → R (f b) (f b'), from
forall_swap.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a, forall_swap.trans $ by simp only [forall_eq'],
by simp only [map, pairwise_cons, mem_map, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp, this, pairwise_map]
theorem pairwise_of_pairwise_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {l : list α}
(p : pairwise S (map f l)) : pairwise R l :=
((pairwise_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem pairwise_map_of_pairwise {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S (map f l) :=
(pairwise_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem pairwise_filter_map (f : β → option α) {l : list β} :
pairwise R (filter_map f l) ↔ pairwise (λ a a' : β, ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), R b b') l :=
let S (a a' : β) := ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), R b b' in
begin
simp only [option.mem_def], induction l with a l IH,
{ simp only [filter_map, pairwise.nil] },
cases e : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ e, IH, pairwise_cons],
simp only [e, forall_prop_of_false not_false, forall_3_true_iff, true_and] },
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ e],
simp only [pairwise_cons, mem_filter_map, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp, IH, e, forall_eq'],
show (∀ (a' : α) (x : β), x ∈ l → f x = some a' → R b a') ∧ pairwise S l ↔
(∀ (a' : β), a' ∈ l → ∀ (b' : α), f a' = some b' → R b b') ∧ pairwise S l,
from and_congr ⟨λ h b mb a ma, h a b mb ma, λ h a b mb ma, h b mb a ma⟩ iff.rfl
end
theorem pairwise_filter_map_of_pairwise {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → option β)
(H : ∀ (a a' : α), R a a' → ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), S b b') {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S (filter_map f l) :=
(pairwise_filter_map _).2 $ p.imp H
theorem pairwise_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} :
pairwise R (filter p l) ↔ pairwise (λ x y, p x → p y → R x y) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, pairwise_filter_map],
apply pairwise.iff, intros, simp only [option.mem_def, option.guard_eq_some, and_imp, forall_eq'],
end
theorem pairwise_filter_of_pairwise (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l : list α}
: pairwise R l → pairwise R (filter p l) :=
pairwise_of_sublist (filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_join {L : list (list α)} : pairwise R (join L) ↔
(∀ l ∈ L, pairwise R l) ∧ pairwise (λ l₁ l₂, ∀ (x ∈ l₁) (y ∈ l₂), R x y) L :=
begin
induction L with l L IH, {simp only [join, pairwise.nil, forall_prop_of_false (not_mem_nil _), forall_const, and_self]},
have : (∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → ∀ (y : α) (x_1 : list α), x_1 ∈ L → y ∈ x_1 → R x y) ↔
∀ (a' : list α), a' ∈ L → ∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ a' → R x y :=
⟨λ h a b c d e, h c d e a b, λ h c d e a b, h a b c d e⟩,
simp only [join, pairwise_append, IH, mem_join, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp, this, forall_mem_cons, pairwise_cons],
simp only [and_assoc, and_comm, and.left_comm],
end
@[simp] theorem pairwise_reverse : ∀ {R} {l : list α},
pairwise R (reverse l) ↔ pairwise (λ x y, R y x) l :=
suffices ∀ {R l}, @pairwise α R l → pairwise (λ x y, R y x) (reverse l),
from λ R l, ⟨λ p, reverse_reverse l ▸ this p, this⟩,
λ R l p, by induction p with a l h p IH;
[apply pairwise.nil, simpa only [reverse_cons, pairwise_append, IH,
pairwise_cons, forall_prop_of_false (not_mem_nil _), forall_true_iff,
pairwise.nil, mem_reverse, mem_singleton, forall_eq, true_and] using h]
theorem pairwise_iff_nth_le {R} : ∀ {l : list α},
pairwise R l ↔ ∀ i j (h₁ : j < length l) (h₂ : i < j), R (nth_le l i (lt_trans h₂ h₁)) (nth_le l j h₁)
| [] := by simp only [pairwise.nil, true_iff]; exact λ i j h, (not_lt_zero j).elim h
| (a::l) := begin
rw [pairwise_cons, pairwise_iff_nth_le],
refine ⟨λ H i j h₁ h₂, _, λ H, ⟨λ a' m, _,
λ i j h₁ h₂, H _ _ (succ_lt_succ h₁) (succ_lt_succ h₂)⟩⟩,
{ cases j with j, {exact (not_lt_zero _).elim h₂},
cases i with i,
{ exact H.1 _ (nth_le_mem l _ _) },
{ exact H.2 _ _ (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₁) (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₂) } },
{ rcases nth_le_of_mem m with ⟨n, h, rfl⟩,
exact H _ _ (succ_lt_succ h) (succ_pos _) }
end
theorem pairwise_sublists' {R} : ∀ {l : list α}, pairwise R l →
pairwise (lex (swap R)) (sublists' l)
| _ pairwise.nil := pairwise_singleton _ _
| _ (@pairwise.cons _ _ a l H₁ H₂) :=
begin
simp only [sublists'_cons, pairwise_append, pairwise_map, mem_sublists', mem_map, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp],
have IH := pairwise_sublists' H₂,
refine ⟨IH, IH.imp (λ l₁ l₂, lex.cons), _⟩,
intros l₁ sl₁ x l₂ sl₂ e, subst e,
cases l₁ with b l₁, {constructor},
exact lex.rel (H₁ _ $ subset_of_sublist sl₁ $ mem_cons_self _ _)
end
theorem pairwise_sublists {R} {l : list α} (H : pairwise R l) :
pairwise (λ l₁ l₂, lex R (reverse l₁) (reverse l₂)) (sublists l) :=
by have := pairwise_sublists' (pairwise_reverse.2 H);
rwa [sublists'_reverse, pairwise_map] at this
/- pairwise reduct -/
variable [decidable_rel R]
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_nil : pw_filter R [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) :
pw_filter R (a::l) = a :: pw_filter R l := if_pos h
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ ∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) :
pw_filter R (a::l) = pw_filter R l := if_neg h
theorem pw_filter_sublist : ∀ (l : list α), pw_filter R l <+ l
| [] := nil_sublist _
| (x::l) := begin
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y),
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact cons_sublist_cons _ (pw_filter_sublist l) },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ (pw_filter_sublist l) },
end
theorem pw_filter_subset (l : list α) : pw_filter R l ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist (pw_filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_pw_filter : ∀ (l : list α), pairwise R (pw_filter R l)
| [] := pairwise.nil
| (x::l) := begin
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y),
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact pairwise_cons.2 ⟨h, pairwise_pw_filter l⟩ },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
exact pairwise_pw_filter l },
end
theorem pw_filter_eq_self {l : list α} : pw_filter R l = l ↔ pairwise R l :=
⟨λ e, e ▸ pairwise_pw_filter l, λ p, begin
induction l with x l IH, {refl},
cases pairwise_cons.1 p with al p,
rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos (ball.imp_left (pw_filter_subset l) al), IH p],
end⟩
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_idempotent {l : list α} :
pw_filter R (pw_filter R l) = pw_filter R l :=
pw_filter_eq_self.mpr (pairwise_pw_filter l)
theorem forall_mem_pw_filter (neg_trans : ∀ {x y z}, R x z → R x y ∨ R y z)
(a : α) (l : list α) : (∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) ↔ (∀ b ∈ l, R a b) :=
⟨begin
induction l with x l IH, { exact λ _ _, false.elim },
simp only [forall_mem_cons],
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y); dsimp at h,
{ simp only [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h, forall_mem_cons, and_imp],
exact λ r H, ⟨r, IH H⟩ },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
refine λ H, ⟨_, IH H⟩,
cases e : find (λ y, ¬ R x y) (pw_filter R l) with k,
{ refine h.elim (ball.imp_right _ (find_eq_none.1 e)),
exact λ y _, not_not.1 },
{ have := find_some e,
exact (neg_trans (H k (find_mem e))).resolve_right this } }
end, ball.imp_left (pw_filter_subset l)⟩
end pairwise
/- chain relation (conjunction of R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d ...) -/
section chain
run_cmd tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop `list.chain `list.chain_iff
variable {R : α → α → Prop}
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem chain.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} (p : chain R a l) : chain S a l :=
by induction p with _ a b l r p IH; constructor;
[exact H _ _ r, exact IH]
theorem chain.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} : chain R a l ↔ chain S a l :=
⟨chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).1), chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).2)⟩
theorem chain.iff_mem {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ chain (λ x y, x ∈ a :: l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) a l :=
⟨λ p, by induction p with _ a b l r p IH; constructor;
[exact ⟨mem_cons_self _ _, mem_cons_self _ _, r⟩,
exact IH.imp (λ a b ⟨am, bm, h⟩,
⟨mem_cons_of_mem _ am, mem_cons_of_mem _ bm, h⟩)],
chain.imp (λ a b h, h.2.2)⟩
theorem chain_singleton {a b : α} : chain R a [b] ↔ R a b :=
by simp only [chain_cons, chain.nil, and_true]
theorem chain_split {a b : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : chain R a (l₁++b::l₂) ↔
chain R a (l₁++[b]) ∧ chain R b l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH generalizing a;
simp only [*, nil_append, cons_append, chain.nil, chain_cons, and_true, and_assoc]
theorem chain_map (f : β → α) {b : β} {l : list β} :
chain R (f b) (map f l) ↔ chain (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) b l :=
by induction l generalizing b; simp only [map, chain.nil, chain_cons, *]
theorem chain_of_chain_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain S (f a) (map f l)) : chain R a l :=
((chain_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem chain_map_of_chain {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a l) : chain S (f a) (map f l) :=
(chain_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem chain_of_pairwise {a : α} {l : list α} (p : pairwise R (a::l)) : chain R a l :=
begin
cases pairwise_cons.1 p with r p', clear p,
induction p' with b l r' p IH generalizing a, {exact chain.nil},
simp only [chain_cons, forall_mem_cons] at r,
exact chain_cons.2 ⟨r.1, IH r'⟩
end
theorem chain_iff_pairwise (tr : transitive R) {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ pairwise R (a::l) :=
⟨λ c, begin
induction c with b b c l r p IH, {exact pairwise_singleton _ _},
apply IH.cons _, simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_mem_cons', r, true_and],
show ∀ x ∈ l, R b x, from λ x m, (tr r (rel_of_pairwise_cons IH m)),
end, chain_of_pairwise⟩
theorem chain'.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {l : list α} (p : chain' R l) : chain' S l :=
by cases l; [trivial, exact p.imp H]
theorem chain'.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {l : list α} : chain' R l ↔ chain' S l :=
⟨chain'.imp (λ a b, (H a b).1), chain'.imp (λ a b, (H a b).2)⟩
theorem chain'.iff_mem {S : α → α → Prop} : ∀ {l : list α},
chain' R l ↔ chain' (λ x y, x ∈ l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) l
| [] := iff.rfl
| (x::l) :=
⟨λ h, (chain.iff_mem.1 h).imp $ λ a b ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, ⟨h₁, or.inr h₂, h₃⟩,
chain'.imp $ λ a b h, h.2.2⟩
theorem chain'_singleton (a : α) : chain' R [a] := chain.nil
theorem chain'_split {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, chain' R (l₁++a::l₂) ↔
chain' R (l₁++[a]) ∧ chain' R (a::l₂)
| [] l₂ := (and_iff_right (chain'_singleton a)).symm
| (b::l₁) l₂ := chain_split
theorem chain'_map (f : β → α) {l : list β} :
chain' R (map f l) ↔ chain' (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) l :=
by cases l; [refl, exact chain_map _]
theorem chain'_of_chain'_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {l : list α}
(p : chain' S (map f l)) : chain' R l :=
((chain'_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem chain'_map_of_chain' {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {l : list α}
(p : chain' R l) : chain' S (map f l) :=
(chain'_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem chain'_of_pairwise : ∀ {l : list α}, pairwise R l → chain' R l
| [] _ := trivial
| (a::l) h := chain_of_pairwise h
theorem chain'_iff_pairwise (tr : transitive R) : ∀ {l : list α},
chain' R l ↔ pairwise R l
| [] := (iff_true_intro pairwise.nil).symm
| (a::l) := chain_iff_pairwise tr
end chain
/- no duplicates predicate -/
section nodup
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_ne {a : α} {l : list α} : (∀ (a' : α), a' ∈ l → ¬a = a') ↔ a ∉ l :=
⟨λ h m, h _ m rfl, λ h a' m e, h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_nil : @nodup α [] := pairwise.nil
@[simp] theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : nodup (a::l) ↔ a ∉ l ∧ nodup l :=
by simp only [nodup, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_ne]
lemma rel_nodup {r : α → β → Prop} (hr : relator.bi_unique r) : (forall₂ r ⇒ (↔)) nodup nodup
| _ _ forall₂.nil := by simp only [nodup_nil]
| _ _ (forall₂.cons hab h) :=
by simpa only [nodup_cons] using relator.rel_and (relator.rel_not (rel_mem hr hab h)) (rel_nodup h)
theorem nodup_cons_of_nodup {a : α} {l : list α} (m : a ∉ l) (n : nodup l) : nodup (a::l) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨m, n⟩
theorem nodup_singleton (a : α) : nodup [a] :=
nodup_cons_of_nodup (not_mem_nil a) nodup_nil
theorem nodup_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : nodup l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
theorem not_mem_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : a ∉ l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
theorem not_nodup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l → ¬ nodup (a :: l) :=
imp_not_comm.1 not_mem_of_nodup_cons
theorem nodup_of_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → nodup l₂ → nodup l₁ :=
pairwise_of_sublist
theorem not_nodup_pair (a : α) : ¬ nodup [a, a] :=
not_nodup_cons_of_mem $ mem_singleton_self _
theorem nodup_iff_sublist {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, ¬ [a, a] <+ l :=
⟨λ d a h, not_nodup_pair a (nodup_of_sublist h d), begin
induction l with a l IH; intro h, {exact nodup_nil},
exact nodup_cons_of_nodup
(λ al, h a $ cons_sublist_cons _ $ singleton_sublist.2 al)
(IH $ λ a s, h a $ sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s)
end⟩
theorem nodup_iff_nth_le_inj {l : list α} :
nodup l ↔ ∀ i j h₁ h₂, nth_le l i h₁ = nth_le l j h₂ → i = j :=
pairwise_iff_nth_le.trans
⟨λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ((lt_trichotomy _ _)
.resolve_left (λ h', H _ _ h₂ h' h))
.resolve_right (λ h', H _ _ h₁ h' h.symm),
λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ne_of_lt h₂ (H _ _ _ _ h)⟩
@[simp] theorem nth_le_index_of [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (H : nodup l) (n h) : index_of (nth_le l n h) l = n :=
nodup_iff_nth_le_inj.1 H _ _ _ h $
index_of_nth_le $ index_of_lt_length.2 $ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, count a l ≤ 1 :=
nodup_iff_sublist.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a,
have [a, a] <+ l ↔ 1 < count a l, from (@le_count_iff_repeat_sublist _ _ a l 2).symm,
(not_congr this).trans not_lt
theorem nodup_repeat (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, nodup (repeat a n) ↔ n ≤ 1
| 0 := by simp [nat.zero_le]
| 1 := by simp
| (n+2) := iff_of_false
(λ H, nodup_iff_sublist.1 H a ((repeat_sublist_repeat _).2 (le_add_left 2 n)))
(not_le_of_lt $ le_add_left 2 n)
@[simp] theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α}
(d : nodup l) (h : a ∈ l) : count a l = 1 :=
le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (count_pos.2 h)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₁ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₂ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup l₁ ∧ nodup l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [nodup, pairwise_append, disjoint_iff_ne]
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : nodup (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(nodup_append.1 d).2.2
theorem nodup_append_of_nodup {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) (dj : disjoint l₁ l₂) : nodup (l₁++l₂) :=
nodup_append.2 ⟨d₁, d₂, dj⟩
theorem nodup_app_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup (l₂++l₁) :=
by simp only [nodup_append, and.left_comm, disjoint_comm]
theorem nodup_middle {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁ ++ a::l₂) ↔ nodup (a::(l₁++l₂)) :=
by simp only [nodup_append, not_or_distrib, and.left_comm, and_assoc, nodup_cons, mem_append, disjoint_cons_right]
theorem nodup_of_nodup_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} : nodup (map f l) → nodup l :=
pairwise_of_pairwise_map f $ λ a b, mt $ congr_arg f
theorem nodup_map_on {f : α → β} {l : list α} (H : ∀x∈l, ∀y∈l, f x = f y → x = y)
(d : nodup l) : nodup (map f l) :=
pairwise_map_of_pairwise _ (by exact λ a b ⟨ma, mb, n⟩ e, n (H a ma b mb e)) (pairwise.and_mem.1 d)
theorem nodup_map {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup l → nodup (map f l) :=
nodup_map_on (assume x _ y _ h, hf h)
theorem nodup_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup (map f l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨nodup_of_nodup_map _, nodup_map hf⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_attach {l : list α} : nodup (attach l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, attach_map_val l ▸ nodup_map (λ a b, subtype.eq) h,
λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map subtype.val ((attach_map_val l).symm ▸ h)⟩
theorem nodup_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {l : list α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h : nodup l) : nodup (pmap f l H) :=
by rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]; exact nodup_map
(λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h, by congr; exact hf a (H _ ha) b (H _ hb) h)
(nodup_attach.2 h)
theorem nodup_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l} : nodup l → nodup (filter p l) :=
pairwise_filter_of_pairwise p
@[simp] theorem nodup_reverse {l : list α} : nodup (reverse l) ↔ nodup l :=
pairwise_reverse.trans $ by simp only [nodup, ne.def, eq_comm]
theorem nodup_erase_eq_filter [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} (d : nodup l) : l.erase a = filter (≠ a) l :=
begin
induction d with b l m d IH, {refl},
by_cases b = a,
{ subst h, rw [erase_cons_head, filter_cons_of_neg],
symmetry, rw filter_eq_self, simpa only [ne.def, eq_comm] using m, exact not_not_intro rfl },
{ rw [erase_cons_tail _ h, filter_cons_of_pos, IH], exact h }
end
theorem nodup_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} : nodup l → nodup (l.erase a) :=
nodup_of_sublist (erase_sublist _ _)
theorem mem_erase_iff_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a b : α} {l} (d : nodup l) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l :=
by rw nodup_erase_eq_filter b d; simp only [mem_filter, and_comm]
theorem mem_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l} (h : nodup l) : a ∉ l.erase a :=
λ H, ((mem_erase_iff_of_nodup h).1 H).1 rfl
theorem nodup_join {L : list (list α)} : nodup (join L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, nodup l) ∧ pairwise disjoint L :=
by simp only [nodup, pairwise_join, disjoint_left.symm, forall_mem_ne]
theorem nodup_bind {l₁ : list α} {f : α → list β} : nodup (l₁.bind f) ↔
(∀ x ∈ l₁, nodup (f x)) ∧ pairwise (λ (a b : α), disjoint (f a) (f b)) l₁ :=
by simp only [list.bind, nodup_join, pairwise_map, and_comm, and.left_comm, mem_map, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp];
rw [show (∀ (l : list β) (x : α), f x = l → x ∈ l₁ → nodup l) ↔
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₁ → nodup (f x)),
from forall_swap.trans $ forall_congr $ λ_, forall_eq']
theorem nodup_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) :
nodup (product l₁ l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (injective_of_left_inverse (λ b, (rfl : (a,b).2 = b))) d₂,
d₁.imp $ λ a₁ a₂ n x h₁ h₂, begin
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, mb₁, rfl⟩,
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩,
exact n rfl
end⟩
theorem nodup_sigma {σ : α → Type*} {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)}
(d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : ∀ a, nodup (l₂ a)) : nodup (l₁.sigma l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (λ b b' h, by injection h with _ h; exact eq_of_heq h) (d₂ a),
d₁.imp $ λ a₁ a₂ n x h₁ h₂, begin
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, mb₁, rfl⟩,
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩,
exact n rfl
end⟩
theorem nodup_filter_map {f : α → option β} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ (a a' : α) (b : β), b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') :
nodup l → nodup (filter_map f l) :=
pairwise_filter_map_of_pairwise f $ λ a a' n b bm b' bm' e, n $ H a a' b' (e ▸ bm) bm'
theorem nodup_concat {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) (h' : nodup l) : nodup (concat l a) :=
by rw concat_eq_append; exact nodup_append_of_nodup h' (nodup_singleton _) (disjoint_singleton.2 h)
theorem nodup_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup l) : nodup (insert a l) :=
if h' : a ∈ l then by rw [insert_of_mem h']; exact h
else by rw [insert_of_not_mem h', nodup_cons]; split; assumption
theorem nodup_union [decidable_eq α] (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : nodup l₂) :
nodup (l₁ ∪ l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ ih generalizing l₂,
{ exact h },
apply nodup_insert,
exact ih h
end
theorem nodup_inter_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {l₁ : list α} (l₂) : nodup l₁ → nodup (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
nodup_filter _
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists {l : list α} : nodup (sublists l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map _ (nodup_of_sublist (map_ret_sublist_sublists _) h),
λ h, (pairwise_sublists h).imp (λ _ _ h, mt reverse_inj.2 h.to_ne)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists' {l : list α} : nodup (sublists' l) ↔ nodup l :=
by rw [sublists'_eq_sublists, nodup_map_iff reverse_injective,
nodup_sublists, nodup_reverse]
end nodup
/- erase duplicates function -/
section erase_dup
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_nil : erase_dup [] = ([] : list α) := rfl
theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ erase_dup l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_neg $ by simpa only [forall_mem_ne] using h
theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ erase_dup l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = a :: erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_pos $ by simpa only [forall_mem_ne] using h
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_dup {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ erase_dup l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simpa only [erase_dup, forall_mem_ne, not_not] using not_congr (@forall_mem_pw_filter α (≠) _
(λ x y z xz, not_and_distrib.1 $ mt (and.rec eq.trans) xz) a l)
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = erase_dup l :=
erase_dup_cons_of_mem' $ mem_erase_dup.2 h
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = a :: erase_dup l :=
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' $ mt mem_erase_dup.1 h
theorem erase_dup_sublist : ∀ (l : list α), erase_dup l <+ l := pw_filter_sublist
theorem erase_dup_subset : ∀ (l : list α), erase_dup l ⊆ l := pw_filter_subset
theorem subset_erase_dup (l : list α) : l ⊆ erase_dup l :=
λ a, mem_erase_dup.2
theorem nodup_erase_dup : ∀ l : list α, nodup (erase_dup l) := pairwise_pw_filter
theorem erase_dup_eq_self {l : list α} : erase_dup l = l ↔ nodup l := pw_filter_eq_self
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_idempotent {l : list α} : erase_dup (erase_dup l) = erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_idempotent
theorem erase_dup_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ∪ erase_dup l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH, {refl}, rw [cons_union, ← IH],
show erase_dup (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) = insert a (erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂)),
by_cases a ∈ erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂);
[ rw [erase_dup_cons_of_mem' h, insert_of_mem h],
rw [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' h, insert_of_not_mem h]]
end
end erase_dup
/- iota and range(') -/
@[simp] theorem length_range' : ∀ (s n : ℕ), length (range' s n) = n
| s 0 := rfl
| s (n+1) := congr_arg succ (length_range' _ _)
@[simp] theorem mem_range' {m : ℕ} : ∀ {s n : ℕ}, m ∈ range' s n ↔ s ≤ m ∧ m < s + n
| s 0 := (false_iff _).2 $ λ ⟨H1, H2⟩, not_le_of_lt H2 H1
| s (succ n) :=
have m = s → m < s + n + 1,
from λ e, e ▸ lt_succ_of_le (le_add_right _ _),
have l : m = s ∨ s + 1 ≤ m ↔ s ≤ m,
by simpa only [eq_comm] using (@le_iff_eq_or_lt _ _ s m).symm,
(mem_cons_iff _ _ _).trans $ by simp only [mem_range',
or_and_distrib_left, or_iff_right_of_imp this, l, add_right_comm]; refl
theorem map_add_range' (a) : ∀ s n : ℕ, map ((+) a) (range' s n) = range' (a + s) n
| s 0 := rfl
| s (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (map_add_range' (s+1) n)
theorem chain_succ_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, chain (λ a b, b = succ a) s (range' (s+1) n)
| s 0 := chain.nil
| s (n+1) := (chain_succ_range' (s+1) n).cons rfl
theorem chain_lt_range' (s n : ℕ) : chain (<) s (range' (s+1) n) :=
(chain_succ_range' s n).imp (λ a b e, e.symm ▸ lt_succ_self _)
theorem pairwise_lt_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, pairwise (<) (range' s n)
| s 0 := pairwise.nil
| s (n+1) := (chain_iff_pairwise (by exact λ a b c, lt_trans)).1 (chain_lt_range' s n)
theorem nodup_range' (s n : ℕ) : nodup (range' s n) :=
(pairwise_lt_range' s n).imp (λ a b, ne_of_lt)
theorem range'_append : ∀ s m n : ℕ, range' s m ++ range' (s+m) n = range' s (n+m)
| s 0 n := rfl
| s (m+1) n := show s :: (range' (s+1) m ++ range' (s+m+1) n) = s :: range' (s+1) (n+m),
by rw [add_right_comm, range'_append]
theorem range'_sublist_right {s m n : ℕ} : range' s m <+ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_range'] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by rw [← nat.sub_add_cancel h, ← range'_append]; apply sublist_append_left⟩
theorem range'_subset_right {s m n : ℕ} : range' s m ⊆ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn, lt_irrefl (s+n) $
(mem_range'.1 $ h $ mem_range'.2 ⟨le_add_right _ _, nat.add_lt_add_left hn s⟩).2,
λ h, subset_of_sublist (range'_sublist_right.2 h)⟩
theorem nth_range' : ∀ s {m n : ℕ}, m < n → nth (range' s n) m = some (s + m)
| s 0 (n+1) _ := rfl
| s (m+1) (n+1) h := (nth_range' (s+1) (lt_of_add_lt_add_right h)).trans $ by rw add_right_comm; refl
theorem range'_concat (s n : ℕ) : range' s (n + 1) = range' s n ++ [s+n] :=
by rw add_comm n 1; exact (range'_append s n 1).symm
theorem range_core_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, range_core s (range' s n) = range' 0 (n + s)
| 0 n := rfl
| (s+1) n := by rw [show n+(s+1) = n+1+s, from add_right_comm n s 1]; exact range_core_range' s (n+1)
theorem range_eq_range' (n : ℕ) : range n = range' 0 n :=
(range_core_range' n 0).trans $ by rw zero_add
theorem range_succ_eq_map (n : ℕ) : range (n + 1) = 0 :: map succ (range n) :=
by rw [range_eq_range', range_eq_range', range',
add_comm, ← map_add_range'];
congr; exact funext one_add
theorem range'_eq_map_range (s n : ℕ) : range' s n = map ((+) s) (range n) :=
by rw [range_eq_range', map_add_range']; refl
@[simp] theorem length_range (n : ℕ) : length (range n) = n :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', length_range']
theorem pairwise_lt_range (n : ℕ) : pairwise (<) (range n) :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', pairwise_lt_range']
theorem nodup_range (n : ℕ) : nodup (range n) :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', nodup_range']
theorem range_sublist {m n : ℕ} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
theorem range_subset {m n : ℕ} : range m ⊆ range n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', range'_subset_right]
@[simp] theorem mem_range {m n : ℕ} : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', mem_range', nat.zero_le, true_and, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem not_mem_range_self {n : ℕ} : n ∉ range n :=
mt mem_range.1 $ lt_irrefl _
theorem nth_range {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : nth (range n) m = some m :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', nth_range' _ h, zero_add]
theorem range_concat (n : ℕ) : range (n + 1) = range n ++ [n] :=
by simp only [range_eq_range', range'_concat, zero_add]
theorem iota_eq_reverse_range' : ∀ n : ℕ, iota n = reverse (range' 1 n)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by simp only [iota, range'_concat, iota_eq_reverse_range' n, reverse_append, add_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem length_iota (n : ℕ) : length (iota n) = n :=
by simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', length_reverse, length_range']
theorem pairwise_gt_iota (n : ℕ) : pairwise (>) (iota n) :=
by simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', pairwise_reverse, pairwise_lt_range']
theorem nodup_iota (n : ℕ) : nodup (iota n) :=
by simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', nodup_reverse, nodup_range']
theorem mem_iota {m n : ℕ} : m ∈ iota n ↔ 1 ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n :=
by simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', mem_reverse, mem_range', add_comm, lt_succ_iff]
theorem reverse_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ,
reverse (range' s n) = map (λ i, s + n - 1 - i) (range n)
| s 0 := rfl
| s (n+1) := by rw [range'_concat, reverse_append, range_succ_eq_map];
simpa only [show s + (n + 1) - 1 = s + n, from rfl, (∘),
λ a i, show a - 1 - i = a - succ i, from pred_sub _ _,
reverse_singleton, map_cons, nat.sub_zero, cons_append,
nil_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, map_map]
using reverse_range' s n
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_fst : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.fst (enum_from n l) = range' n l.length
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_fst _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_fst (l : list α) :
map prod.fst (enum l) = range l.length :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_map_fst, range_eq_range']
theorem last'_mem {α} : ∀ a l, @last' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (last'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach {α} (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
@[simp] lemma nth_le_range {n} (i) (H : i < (range n).length) :
nth_le (range n) i H = i :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth _, nth_range (by simpa using H)]
theorem of_fn_eq_pmap {α n} {f : fin n → α} :
of_fn f = pmap (λ i hi, f ⟨i, hi⟩) (range n) (λ _, mem_range.1) :=
by rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]; from ext_le (by simp)
(λ i hi1 hi2, by simp at hi1; simp [nth_le_of_fn f ⟨i, hi1⟩])
theorem nodup_of_fn {α n} {f : fin n → α} (hf : function.injective f) :
nodup (of_fn f) :=
by rw of_fn_eq_pmap; from nodup_pmap
(λ _ _ _ _ H, fin.veq_of_eq $ hf H) (nodup_range n)
section tfae
/- tfae: The Following (propositions) Are Equivalent -/
theorem tfae_nil : tfae [] := forall_mem_nil _
theorem tfae_singleton (p) : tfae [p] := by simp [tfae]
theorem tfae_cons_of_mem {a b} {l : list Prop} (h : b ∈ l) :
tfae (a::l) ↔ (a ↔ b) ∧ tfae l :=
⟨λ H, ⟨H a (by simp) b (or.inr h), λ p hp q hq, H _ (or.inr hp) _ (or.inr hq)⟩,
begin
rintro ⟨ab, H⟩ p (rfl | hp) q (rfl | hq),
{ refl },
{ exact ab.trans (H _ h _ hq) },
{ exact (ab.trans (H _ h _ hp)).symm },
{ exact H _ hp _ hq }
end⟩
theorem tfae_cons_cons {a b} {l : list Prop} : tfae (a::b::l) ↔ (a ↔ b) ∧ tfae (b::l) :=
tfae_cons_of_mem (or.inl rfl)
theorem tfae_of_forall (b : Prop) (l : list Prop) (h : ∀ a ∈ l, a ↔ b) : tfae l :=
λ a₁ h₁ a₂ h₂, (h _ h₁).trans (h _ h₂).symm
theorem tfae_of_cycle {a b} {l : list Prop} :
list.chain (→) a (b::l) → (last' b l → a) → tfae (a::b::l) :=
begin
induction l with c l IH generalizing a b; simp [tfae_cons_cons, tfae_singleton] at *,
{ intros a _ b, exact iff.intro a b },
intros ab bc ch la,
have := IH bc ch (ab ∘ la),
exact ⟨⟨ab, la ∘ (this.2 c (or.inl rfl) _ (last'_mem _ _)).1 ∘ bc⟩, this⟩
end
theorem tfae.out {l} (h : tfae l) (n₁ n₂)
(h₁ : n₁ < list.length l . tactic.exact_dec_trivial)
(h₂ : n₂ < list.length l . tactic.exact_dec_trivial) :
list.nth_le l n₁ h₁ ↔ list.nth_le l n₂ h₂ :=
h _ (list.nth_le_mem _ _ _) _ (list.nth_le_mem _ _ _)
end tfae
lemma rotate_mod (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n :=
by simp [rotate]
@[simp] lemma rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : list α).rotate n = [] := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma rotate_zero (l : list α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
@[simp] lemma rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : list α).rotate' n = [] := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma rotate'_zero (l : list α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l; refl
lemma rotate'_cons_succ (l : list α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : list α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
@[simp] lemma length_rotate' : ∀ (l : list α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [] n := rfl
| (a::l) 0 := rfl
| (a::l) (n+1) := by rw [list.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
lemma rotate'_eq_take_append_drop : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length →
l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [] n h := by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l 0 h := by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| (a::l) (n+1) h :=
have hnl : n ≤ l.length, from le_of_succ_le_succ h,
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length,
by rw [length_append, length_cons, list.length, zero_add];
exact (le_of_succ_le h),
by rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_take_append_drop hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl];
simp
lemma rotate'_rotate' : ∀ (l : list α) (n m : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).rotate' m = l.rotate' (n + m)
| (a::l) 0 m := by simp
| [] n m := by simp
| (a::l) (n+1) m := by rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_rotate', add_right_comm, rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp] lemma rotate'_length (l : list α) : rotate' l l.length = l :=
by rw rotate'_eq_take_append_drop (le_refl _); simp
@[simp] lemma rotate'_length_mul (l : list α) : ∀ n : ℕ, l.rotate' (l.length * n) = l
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) :=
calc l.rotate' (l.length * (n + 1)) =
(l.rotate' (l.length * n)).rotate' (l.rotate' (l.length * n)).length :
by simp [-rotate'_length, nat.mul_succ, rotate'_rotate']
... = l : by rw [rotate'_length, rotate'_length_mul]
lemma rotate'_mod (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate' (n % l.length) = l.rotate' n :=
calc l.rotate' (n % l.length) = (l.rotate' (n % l.length)).rotate'
((l.rotate' (n % l.length)).length * (n / l.length)) : by rw rotate'_length_mul
... = l.rotate' n : by rw [rotate'_rotate', length_rotate', nat.mod_add_div]
lemma rotate_eq_rotate' (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n = l.rotate' n :=
if h : l.length = 0 then by simp [length_eq_zero, *] at *
else by
rw [← rotate'_mod, rotate'_eq_take_append_drop (le_of_lt (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))];
simp [rotate]
lemma rotate_cons_succ (l : list α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : list α).rotate n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate n :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp] lemma length_rotate (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).length = l.length :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', length_rotate']
lemma rotate_eq_take_append_drop {l : list α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ l.length →
l.rotate n = l.drop n ++ l.take n :=
by rw rotate_eq_rotate'; exact rotate'_eq_take_append_drop
lemma rotate_rotate (l : list α) (n m : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).rotate m = l.rotate (n + m) :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_rotate']
@[simp] lemma rotate_length (l : list α) : rotate l l.length = l :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length]
@[simp] lemma rotate_length_mul (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (l.length * n) = l :=
by rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length_mul]
lemma prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one [group α] : ∀ {l : list α} (hl : l.prod = 1) (n : ℕ),
(l.rotate n).prod = 1
| [] _ _ := by simp
| (a::l) hl n :=
have n % list.length (a :: l) ≤ list.length (a :: l), from le_of_lt (nat.mod_lt _ dec_trivial),
by rw ← list.take_append_drop (n % list.length (a :: l)) (a :: l) at hl;
rw [← rotate_mod, rotate_eq_take_append_drop this, list.prod_append, mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq,
← one_mul (list.prod _)⁻¹, ← hl, list.prod_append, mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
end list
theorem option.to_list_nodup {α} : ∀ o : option α, o.to_list.nodup
| none := list.nodup_nil
| (some x) := list.nodup_singleton x
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.