blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
96ecb08532855d1800fcb4fa52b40e81e0016505 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/group_theory/presented_group.lean | eeaf9f3ee73f75a7044d547506bb37edafafa837 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,840 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Michael Howes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Howes
Defining a group given by generators and relations
-/
import group_theory.free_group group_theory.quotient_group
variables {α : Type}
/-- Given a set of relations, rels, over a type α, presented_group constructs the group with
generators α and relations rels as a quotient of free_group α.-/
def presented_group (rels : set (free_group α)) : Type :=
quotient_group.quotient $ group.normal_closure rels
namespace presented_group
instance (rels : set (free_group α)) : group (presented_group (rels)) :=
quotient_group.group _
/-- `of x` is the canonical map from α to a presented group with generators α. The term x is
mapped to the equivalence class of the image of x in free_group α. -/
def of {rels : set (free_group α)} (x : α) : presented_group rels :=
quotient_group.mk (free_group.of x)
section to_group
/-
Presented groups satisfy a universal property. If β is a group and f : α → β is a map such that the
images of f satisfy all the given relations, then f extends uniquely to a group homomorphism from
presented_group rels to β
-/
variables {β : Type} [group β] {f : α → β} {rels : set (free_group α)}
local notation `F` := free_group.to_group f
variable (h : ∀ r ∈ rels, F r = 1)
lemma closure_rels_subset_ker : group.normal_closure rels ⊆ is_group_hom.ker F :=
group.normal_closure_subset (λ x w, (is_group_hom.mem_ker F).2 (h x w))
lemma to_group_eq_one_of_mem_closure : ∀ x ∈ group.normal_closure rels, F x = 1 :=
λ x w, (is_group_hom.mem_ker F).1 ((closure_rels_subset_ker h) w)
/-- The extension of a map f : α → β that satisfies the given relations to a group homomorphism
from presented_group rels → β. -/
def to_group : presented_group rels → β :=
quotient_group.lift (group.normal_closure rels) F (to_group_eq_one_of_mem_closure h)
instance to_group.is_group_hom : is_group_hom (to_group h) :=
quotient_group.is_group_hom_quotient_lift _ _ _
@[simp] lemma to_group.of {x : α} : to_group h (of x) = f x := free_group.to_group.of
@[simp] lemma to_group.mul {x y} : to_group h (x * y) = to_group h x * to_group h y :=
is_mul_hom.map_mul _ _ _
@[simp] lemma to_group.one : to_group h 1 = 1 :=
is_group_hom.map_one _
@[simp] lemma to_group.inv {x}: to_group h x⁻¹ = (to_group h x)⁻¹ :=
is_group_hom.map_inv _ _
theorem to_group.unique (g : presented_group rels → β) [is_group_hom g]
(hg : ∀ x : α, g (of x) = f x) : ∀ {x}, g x = to_group h x :=
have is_group_hom (λ x, g (quotient_group.mk x)) := is_group_hom.comp _ _, by exactI
λ x, quotient_group.induction_on x
(λ _, free_group.to_group.unique (λ (x : free_group α), g (quotient_group.mk x)) hg)
end to_group
end presented_group
|
a6ce61c736274330ae5af8ea8ee7c943bc0d6806 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/local_ref_bugs.lean | 613504d744e8189545054243ca2815b07a1c204f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 710 | lean | set_option pp.all true
section
parameter α : Type
inductive foo : Type | a : α → foo | b
#check (foo.b : foo)
open foo
#check (foo.b : foo)
#check (b : foo)
open tactic
include α
example : true :=
by do
e ← to_expr ```(b),
t ← infer_type e,
trace "-------",
trace e,
trace t,
trace "-------",
triv
def ex : foo := begin trace_state, exact b end
end
namespace bla
section
parameter α : Type
inductive foo : Type | a : α → foo | b
#check (foo.b : foo)
open foo
#check (foo.b : foo)
#check (b : foo)
end
end bla
namespace boo
section
parameter α : Type
inductive foo : Type | a : α → foo | b
#check (foo.b : foo)
open foo (b)
#check (foo.b : foo)
#check (b : foo)
end
end boo
|
2097c0188d89cd2a6917a4eacb3d526a8876a9a4 | 30b012bb72d640ec30c8fdd4c45fdfa67beb012c | /linear_algebra/tensor_product.lean | 9f31518e6ec3131e0efcbb4fdf692b14457a82ff | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kckennylau/mathlib | 21fb810b701b10d6606d9002a4004f7672262e83 | 47b3477e20ffb5a06588dd3abb01fe0fe3205646 | refs/heads/master | 1,634,976,409,281 | 1,542,042,832,000 | 1,542,319,733,000 | 109,560,458 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,542,369,208,000 | 1,509,867,494,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,957 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro
Tensor product of modules over commutative rings.
-/
import group_theory.free_abelian_group
import linear_algebra.direct_sum_module
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} {Q : Type*}
variables [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group N] [add_comm_group P] [add_comm_group Q]
variables [module R M] [module R N] [module R P] [module R Q]
include R
set_option class.instance_max_depth 100
namespace linear_map
def mk₂ (f : M → N → P)
(H1 : ∀ m₁ m₂ n, f (m₁ + m₂) n = f m₁ n + f m₂ n)
(H2 : ∀ c m n, f (c • m) n = c • f m n)
(H3 : ∀ m n₁ n₂, f m (n₁ + n₂) = f m n₁ + f m n₂)
(H4 : ∀ c m n, f m (c • n) = c • f m n) : M →ₗ N →ₗ P :=
⟨λ m, ⟨f m, H3 m, λ c, H4 c m⟩,
λ m₁ m₂, linear_map.ext $ H1 m₁ m₂,
λ c m, linear_map.ext $ H2 c m⟩
@[simp] theorem mk₂_apply
(f : M → N → P) {H1 H2 H3 H4} (m : M) (n : N) :
(mk₂ f H1 H2 H3 H4 : M →ₗ N →ₗ P) m n = f m n := rfl
variables (f : M →ₗ N →ₗ P)
theorem ext₂ {f g : M →ₗ N →ₗ P}
(H : ∀ m n, f m n = g m n) : f = g :=
linear_map.ext (λ m, linear_map.ext $ λ n, H m n)
def flip : N →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
mk₂ (λ n m, f m n)
(λ n₁ n₂ m, (f m).map_add _ _)
(λ c n m, (f m).map_smul _ _)
(λ n m₁ m₂, by rw f.map_add; refl)
(λ c n m, by rw f.map_smul; refl)
@[simp] theorem flip_apply (m : M) (n : N) : flip f n m = f m n := rfl
theorem flip_inj {f g : M →ₗ N →ₗ P} (H : flip f = flip g) : f = g :=
ext₂ $ λ m n, show flip f n m = flip g n m, by rw H
variables (R M N P)
def lflip : (M →ₗ N →ₗ P) →ₗ N →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
⟨flip, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
variables {R M N P}
@[simp] theorem lflip_apply (m : M) (n : N) : lflip R M N P f n m = f m n := rfl
theorem map_zero₂ (y) : f 0 y = 0 := (flip f y).map_zero
theorem map_neg₂ (x y) : f (-x) y = -f x y := (flip f y).map_neg _
theorem map_add₂ (x₁ x₂ y) : f (x₁ + x₂) y = f x₁ y + f x₂ y := (flip f y).map_add _ _
theorem map_smul₂ (r x y) : f (r • x) y = r • f x y := (flip f y).map_smul _ _
variables (P)
def lcomp (f : M →ₗ N) : (N →ₗ P) →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
flip $ (flip id).comp f
variables {P}
@[simp] theorem lcomp_apply (f : M →ₗ N) (g : N →ₗ P) (x : M) :
lcomp P f g x = g (f x) := rfl
variables (M N P)
def llcomp : (N →ₗ P) →ₗ (M →ₗ N) →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
flip ⟨lcomp P,
λ f f', ext₂ $ λ g x, g.map_add _ _,
λ c f, ext₂ $ λ g x, g.map_smul _ _⟩
variables {M N P}
section
@[simp] theorem llcomp_apply (f : N →ₗ P) (g : M →ₗ N) (x : M) :
llcomp M N P f g x = f (g x) := rfl
end
def compl₂ (g : Q →ₗ N) : M →ₗ Q →ₗ P := (lcomp _ g).comp f
@[simp] theorem compl₂_apply (g : Q →ₗ N) (m : M) (q : Q) :
f.compl₂ g m q = f m (g q) := rfl
def compr₂ (g : P →ₗ Q) : M →ₗ N →ₗ Q :=
linear_map.comp (llcomp N P Q g) f
@[simp] theorem compr₂_apply (g : P →ₗ Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
f.compr₂ g m n = g (f m n) := rfl
variables (R M)
def lsmul : R →ₗ M →ₗ M :=
mk₂ (•) add_smul (λ _ _ _, eq.symm $ smul_smul _ _ _) smul_add
(λ r s m, by simp only [smul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm])
variables {R M}
@[simp] theorem lsmul_apply (r : R) (m : M) : lsmul R M r m = r • m := rfl
end linear_map
variables (M N)
namespace tensor_product
section
open free_abelian_group
def relators : set (free_abelian_group (M × N)) :=
add_group.closure { x : free_abelian_group (M × N) |
(∃ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N), x = of (m₁, n) + of (m₂, n) - of (m₁ + m₂, n)) ∨
(∃ (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), x = of (m, n₁) + of (m, n₂) - of (m, n₁ + n₂)) ∨
(∃ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), x = of (r • m, n) - of (m, r • n)) }
end
namespace relators
instance : normal_add_subgroup (relators M N) :=
by unfold relators; apply normal_add_subgroup_of_add_comm_group
end relators
end tensor_product
def tensor_product : Type* :=
quotient_add_group.quotient (tensor_product.relators M N)
local infix ` ⊗ `:100 := tensor_product
namespace tensor_product
section module
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.left_rel normal_add_subgroup.to_is_add_subgroup
instance : add_comm_group (M ⊗ N) := quotient_add_group.add_comm_group _
instance quotient.mk.is_add_group_hom :
is_add_group_hom (quotient.mk : free_abelian_group (M × N) → M ⊗ N) :=
quotient_add_group.is_add_group_hom _
variables {M N}
def tmul (m : M) (n : N) : M ⊗ N := quotient_add_group.mk $ free_abelian_group.of (m, n)
infix ` ⊗ₜ `:100 := tmul
lemma add_tmul (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : (m₁ + m₂) ⊗ₜ n = m₁ ⊗ₜ n + m₂ ⊗ₜ n :=
eq.symm $ sub_eq_zero.1 $ eq.symm $ quotient.sound $
group.in_closure.basic $ or.inl $ ⟨m₁, m₂, n, rfl⟩
lemma tmul_add (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N) : m ⊗ₜ (n₁ + n₂) = m ⊗ₜ n₁ + m ⊗ₜ n₂ :=
eq.symm $ sub_eq_zero.1 $ eq.symm $ quotient.sound $
group.in_closure.basic $ or.inr $ or.inl $ ⟨m, n₁, n₂, rfl⟩
lemma smul_tmul (r : R) (m : M) (n : N) : (r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ (r • n) :=
sub_eq_zero.1 $ eq.symm $ quotient.sound $
group.in_closure.basic $ or.inr $ or.inr $ ⟨r, m, n, rfl⟩
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.is_add_group_hom_quotient_lift
def smul.aux (r : R) : free_abelian_group (M × N) → M ⊗ N :=
free_abelian_group.lift (λ (y : M × N), (r • y.1) ⊗ₜ y.2)
instance (r : R) : is_add_group_hom (smul.aux r : _ → M ⊗ N) :=
by unfold smul.aux; apply_instance
instance : has_scalar R (M ⊗ N) :=
⟨λ r, quotient_add_group.lift _ (smul.aux r) $ λ x hx, begin
refine (is_add_group_hom.mem_ker (smul.aux r : _ → M ⊗ N)).1
(add_group.closure_subset _ hx),
clear hx x, rintro x (⟨m₁, m₂, n, rfl⟩ | ⟨m, n₁, n₂, rfl⟩ | ⟨q, m, n, rfl⟩);
simp only [smul.aux, is_add_group_hom.mem_ker, -sub_eq_add_neg,
sub_self, add_tmul, tmul_add, smul_tmul,
smul_add, smul_smul, mul_comm, free_abelian_group.lift.of,
free_abelian_group.lift.add, free_abelian_group.lift.sub]
end⟩
instance smul.is_add_group_hom (r : R) : is_add_group_hom ((•) r : M ⊗ N → M ⊗ N) :=
by unfold has_scalar.smul; apply_instance
protected theorem smul_add (r : R) (x y : M ⊗ N) :
r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
is_add_group_hom.add _ _ _
instance : module R (M ⊗ N) := module.of_core
{ smul := (•),
smul_add := tensor_product.smul_add,
add_smul := begin
intros r s x,
apply quotient_add_group.induction_on' x,
intro z,
symmetry,
refine @free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ _ _ _ ⟨λ p q, _⟩ _ z,
{ simp [tensor_product.smul_add] },
rintro ⟨m, n⟩,
change (r • m) ⊗ₜ n + (s • m) ⊗ₜ n = ((r + s) • m) ⊗ₜ n,
rw [add_smul, add_tmul]
end,
mul_smul := begin
intros r s x,
apply quotient_add_group.induction_on' x,
intro z,
symmetry,
refine @free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ _ _ _
⟨λ p q, _⟩ _ z,
{ simp [tensor_product.smul_add] },
rintro ⟨m, n⟩,
change r • s • (m ⊗ₜ n) = ((r * s) • m) ⊗ₜ n,
rw mul_smul, refl
end,
one_smul := λ x, quotient.induction_on x $ λ _,
eq.symm $ free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ $ λ ⟨p, q⟩,
by rw one_smul; refl }
@[simp] lemma tmul_smul (r : R) (x : M) (y : N) : x ⊗ₜ (r • y) = r • (x ⊗ₜ y) :=
(smul_tmul _ _ _).symm
variables (R M N)
def mk : M →ₗ N →ₗ M ⊗ N :=
linear_map.mk₂ (⊗ₜ) add_tmul (λ c m n, by rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul]) tmul_add tmul_smul
variables {R M N}
@[simp] lemma mk_apply (m : M) (n : N) : mk R M N m n = m ⊗ₜ n := rfl
lemma zero_tmul (n : N) : (0 ⊗ₜ n : M ⊗ N) = 0 := (mk R M N).map_zero₂ _
lemma tmul_zero (m : M) : (m ⊗ₜ 0 : M ⊗ N) = 0 := (mk R M N _).map_zero
lemma neg_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (-m) ⊗ₜ n = -(m ⊗ₜ n) := (mk R M N).map_neg₂ _ _
lemma tmul_neg (m : M) (n : N) : m ⊗ₜ (-n) = -(m ⊗ₜ n) := (mk R M N _).map_neg _
end module
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.left_rel normal_add_subgroup.to_is_add_subgroup
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on
{C : M ⊗ N → Prop}
(z : M ⊗ N)
(C0 : C 0)
(C1 : ∀ x y, C $ x ⊗ₜ y)
(Cp : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C z :=
quotient.induction_on z $ λ x, free_abelian_group.induction_on x
C0 (λ ⟨p, q⟩, C1 p q)
(λ ⟨p, q⟩ _, show C (-(p ⊗ₜ q)), by rw ← neg_tmul; from C1 (-p) q)
(λ _ _, Cp _ _)
section UMP
variables {M N P Q}
variables (f : M →ₗ N →ₗ P)
local attribute [instance] free_abelian_group.lift.is_add_group_hom
def lift_aux : M ⊗ N → P :=
quotient_add_group.lift _
(free_abelian_group.lift $ λ z, f z.1 z.2) $ λ x hx,
begin
refine (is_add_group_hom.mem_ker _).1 (add_group.closure_subset _ hx),
clear hx x, rintro x (⟨m₁, m₂, n, rfl⟩ | ⟨m, n₁, n₂, rfl⟩ | ⟨q, m, n, rfl⟩);
simp [is_add_group_hom.mem_ker, -sub_eq_add_neg,
f.map_add, f.map_add₂, f.map_smul, f.map_smul₂, sub_self],
end
variable {f}
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.left_rel normal_add_subgroup.to_is_add_subgroup
@[simp] lemma lift_aux.add (x y) : lift_aux f (x + y) = lift_aux f x + lift_aux f y :=
quotient.induction_on₂ x y $ λ m n, free_abelian_group.lift.add _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lift_aux.smul (r x) : lift_aux f (r • x) = r • lift_aux f x :=
tensor_product.induction_on _ _ x (smul_zero _).symm
(λ p q, by rw [← tmul_smul]; simp [lift_aux, tmul])
(λ p q ih1 ih2, by simp [@smul_add _ _ _ _ _ _ p _,
lift_aux.add, ih1, ih2, smul_add])
variable (f)
def lift : M ⊗ N →ₗ P :=
{ to_fun := lift_aux f,
add := lift_aux.add,
smul := lift_aux.smul }
variable {f}
@[simp] lemma lift.tmul (x y) : lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
zero_add _
@[simp] lemma lift.tmul' (x y) : (lift f).1 (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
lift.tmul _ _
theorem lift.unique {g : linear_map (M ⊗ N) P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y) :
g = lift f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ z, begin
apply quotient_add_group.induction_on' z,
intro z,
refine @free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ _ _ _ ⟨λ p q, _⟩ _ z,
{ simp [g.2] },
exact λ ⟨m, n⟩, H m n
end
theorem lift_mk : lift (mk R M N) = linear_map.id :=
eq.symm $ lift.unique $ λ x y, rfl
theorem lift_compr₂ (g : P →ₗ Q) : lift (f.compr₂ g) = g.comp (lift f) :=
eq.symm $ lift.unique $ λ x y, by simp
theorem lift_mk_compr₂ (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) : lift ((mk R M N).compr₂ f) = f :=
by rw [lift_compr₂, lift_mk, linear_map.comp_id]
theorem ext {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ P}
(H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
by rw ← lift_mk_compr₂ h; exact lift.unique H
theorem mk_compr₂_inj {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ P}
(H : (mk R M N).compr₂ g = (mk R M N).compr₂ h) : g = h :=
by rw [← lift_mk_compr₂ g, H, lift_mk_compr₂]
example : M → N → (M → N → P) → P :=
λ m, flip $ λ f, f m
variables (M N P)
def uncurry : (M →ₗ N →ₗ P) →ₗ M ⊗ N →ₗ P :=
linear_map.flip $ lift $ (linear_map.lflip _ _ _ _).comp linear_map.id.flip
variables {M N P}
@[simp] theorem uncurry_apply (f : M →ₗ N →ₗ P) (m : M) (n : N) :
uncurry M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
by rw [uncurry, linear_map.flip_apply, lift.tmul]; refl
variables (M N P)
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ N →ₗ P) ≃ₗ (M ⊗ N →ₗ P) :=
{ inv_fun := λ f, (mk R M N).compr₂ f,
left_inv := λ f, linear_map.ext₂ $ λ m n, lift.tmul _ _,
right_inv := λ f, ext $ λ m n, lift.tmul _ _,
.. uncurry M N P }
def lcurry : (M ⊗ N →ₗ P) →ₗ M →ₗ N →ₗ P :=
(lift.equiv M N P).symm
variables {M N P}
@[simp] theorem lcurry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) (m : M) (n : N) :
lcurry M N P f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) := rfl
def curry (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) : M →ₗ N →ₗ P := lcurry M N P f
@[simp] theorem curry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) (m : M) (n : N) :
curry f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) := rfl
end UMP
variables {M N}
protected def lid : R ⊗ M ≃ₗ M :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (lift $ linear_map.lsmul R M) (mk R R M 1)
(linear_map.ext $ λ _, by simp)
(ext $ λ r m, by simp; rw [← tmul_smul, ← smul_tmul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one])
protected def comm : M ⊗ N ≃ₗ N ⊗ M :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (lift (mk R N M).flip) (lift (mk R M N).flip)
(ext $ λ m n, rfl)
(ext $ λ m n, rfl)
open linear_map
protected def assoc : (M ⊗ N) ⊗ P ≃ₗ M ⊗ (N ⊗ P) :=
begin
refine linear_equiv.of_linear
(lift $ lift $ comp (lcurry _ _ _) $ mk _ _ _)
(lift $ comp (uncurry _ _ _) $ curry $ mk _ _ _)
(mk_compr₂_inj $ linear_map.ext $ λ m, ext $ λ n p, _)
(mk_compr₂_inj $ flip_inj $ linear_map.ext $ λ p, ext $ λ m n, _);
repeat { rw lift.tmul <|> rw compr₂_apply <|> rw comp_apply <|>
rw mk_apply <|> rw flip_apply <|> rw lcurry_apply <|>
rw uncurry_apply <|> rw curry_apply <|> rw id_apply }
end
def map (f : M →ₗ P) (g : N →ₗ Q) : M ⊗ N →ₗ P ⊗ Q :=
lift $ comp (compl₂ (mk _ _ _) g) f
@[simp] theorem map_tmul (f : M →ₗ P) (g : N →ₗ Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
map f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
def congr (f : M ≃ₗ P) (g : N ≃ₗ Q) : M ⊗ N ≃ₗ P ⊗ Q :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (map f g) (map f.symm g.symm)
(ext $ λ m n, by simp; simp only [linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply])
(ext $ λ m n, by simp; simp only [linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply])
variables (ι₁ : Type*) (ι₂ : Type*)
variables [decidable_eq ι₁] [decidable_eq ι₂]
variables (β₁ : ι₁ → Type*) (β₂ : ι₂ → Type*)
variables [Π i₁, add_comm_group (β₁ i₁)] [Π i₂, add_comm_group (β₂ i₂)]
variables [Π i₁, module R (β₁ i₁)] [Π i₂, module R (β₂ i₂)]
def direct_sum : direct_sum R ι₁ β₁ ⊗ direct_sum R ι₂ β₂
≃ₗ direct_sum R (ι₁ × ι₂) (λ i, β₁ i.1 ⊗ β₂ i.2) :=
begin
refine linear_equiv.of_linear
(lift $ direct_sum.to_module $ λ i₁, flip $ direct_sum.to_module $ λ i₂,
flip $ curry $ direct_sum.of (λ i : ι₁ × ι₂, β₁ i.1 ⊗ β₂ i.2) (i₁, i₂))
(direct_sum.to_module $ λ i, map (direct_sum.of _ _) (direct_sum.of _ _))
(linear_map.ext $ direct_sum.to_module.ext $ λ i, mk_compr₂_inj $
linear_map.ext $ λ x₁, linear_map.ext $ λ x₂, _)
(mk_compr₂_inj $ linear_map.ext $ direct_sum.to_module.ext $ λ i₁, linear_map.ext $ λ x₁,
linear_map.ext $ direct_sum.to_module.ext $ λ i₂, linear_map.ext $ λ x₂, _);
repeat { rw compr₂_apply <|> rw comp_apply <|> rw id_apply <|> rw mk_apply <|>
rw direct_sum.to_module.of <|> rw map_tmul <|> rw lift.tmul <|> rw flip_apply <|>
rw curry_apply },
cases i; refl
end
end tensor_product
|
007c1f1b3947d4fef74d3aabd354b6a5dc69fc16 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/const.lean | 78a6411ac0cdc0e776e69143ef7b5af4ce0537e2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,814 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.opposites
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.functor
variables (J : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} J]
variables {C : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} C]
/--
The functor sending `X : C` to the constant functor `J ⥤ C` sending everything to `X`.
-/
def const : C ⥤ (J ⥤ C) :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ obj := λ j, X,
map := λ j j' f, 𝟙 X },
map := λ X Y f, { app := λ j, f } }
namespace const
open opposite
variables {J}
@[simp] lemma obj_obj (X : C) (j : J) : ((const J).obj X).obj j = X := rfl
@[simp] lemma obj_map (X : C) {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') : ((const J).obj X).map f = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_app {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (j : J) : ((const J).map f).app j = f := rfl
/--
The contant functor `Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` sending everything to `op X`
is (naturally isomorphic to) the opposite of the constant functor `J ⥤ C` sending everything to `X`.
-/
def op_obj_op (X : C) :
(const Jᵒᵖ).obj (op X) ≅ ((const J).obj X).op :=
{ hom := { app := λ j, 𝟙 _ },
inv := { app := λ j, 𝟙 _ } }
@[simp] lemma op_obj_op_hom_app (X : C) (j : Jᵒᵖ) : (op_obj_op X).hom.app j = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma op_obj_op_inv_app (X : C) (j : Jᵒᵖ) : (op_obj_op X).inv.app j = 𝟙 _ := rfl
/--
The contant functor `Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C` sending everything to `unop X`
is (naturally isomorphic to) the opposite of
the constant functor `J ⥤ Cᵒᵖ` sending everything to `X`.
-/
def op_obj_unop (X : Cᵒᵖ) :
(const Jᵒᵖ).obj (unop X) ≅ ((const J).obj X).left_op :=
{ hom := { app := λ j, 𝟙 _ },
inv := { app := λ j, 𝟙 _ } }
-- Lean needs some help with universes here.
@[simp] lemma op_obj_unop_hom_app (X : Cᵒᵖ) (j : Jᵒᵖ) : (op_obj_unop.{v₁ v₂} X).hom.app j = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma op_obj_unop_inv_app (X : Cᵒᵖ) (j : Jᵒᵖ) : (op_obj_unop.{v₁ v₂} X).inv.app j = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma unop_functor_op_obj_map (X : Cᵒᵖ) {j₁ j₂ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) :
(unop ((functor.op (const J)).obj X)).map f = 𝟙 (unop X) := rfl
end const
section
variables {D : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} D]
/-- These are actually equal, of course, but not definitionally equal
(the equality requires F.map (𝟙 _) = 𝟙 _). A natural isomorphism is
more convenient than an equality between functors (compare id_to_iso). -/
@[simps] def const_comp (X : C) (F : C ⥤ D) :
(const J).obj X ⋙ F ≅ (const J).obj (F.obj X) :=
{ hom := { app := λ _, 𝟙 _ },
inv := { app := λ _, 𝟙 _ } }
end
end category_theory.functor
|
daec594cddd9e82536e39f7b00abaf9ed095ad80 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/error_pos.lean | ef4706d2e32b2fd38aae2ddfa6e1c6c55450b56e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 491 | lean | example (A : Type) (B : A → Type) (b : B) : true :=
trivial
example : ∀ (A : Type) (B : A → Type) (b : B), true :=
begin
intros, trivial
end
#check λ (A : Type) (B : A → Type) (b : B), true
#check λ (A : Type) (B : A → Type), B → true
#check λ (A : Type) (B : A → Type) b, (b : B)
example {A : Type} {B : Type} {a₁ a₂ : B} {b₁ b₂ : A → B} : a₁ = a₂ → (∀ x, b₁ x = b₂ x) → (let x : A := a₁ in b₁ x) = (let x : A := a₂ in b₂ x) :=
sorry
|
e2b1cb1d4f6a223fd8a509ec8528b0b78bded12b | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/data/matrix/notation.lean | 32585fcf769c580533455582e464088f16be1966 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,732 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import data.fintype.card
import data.matrix.basic
import tactic.fin_cases
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file defines notation for vectors and matrices. Given `a b c d : α`,
the notation allows us to write `![a, b, c, d] : fin 4 → α`.
Nesting vectors gives a matrix, so `![![a, b], ![c, d]] : matrix (fin 2) (fin 2) α`.
This file includes `simp` lemmas for applying operations in
`data.matrix.basic` to values built out of this notation.
## Main definitions
* `vec_empty` is the empty vector (or `0` by `n` matrix) `![]`
* `vec_cons` prepends an entry to a vector, so `![a, b]` is `vec_cons a (vec_cons b vec_empty)`
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vec_cons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
The main new notation is `![a, b]`, which gets expanded to `vec_cons a (vec_cons b vec_empty)`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `test/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace matrix
universe u
variables {α : Type u}
open_locale matrix
section matrix_notation
/-- `![]` is the vector with no entries. -/
def vec_empty : fin 0 → α :=
fin_zero_elim
/-- `vec_cons h t` prepends an entry `h` to a vector `t`.
The inverse functions are `vec_head` and `vec_tail`.
The notation `![a, b, ...]` expands to `vec_cons a (vec_cons b ...)`.
-/
def vec_cons {n : ℕ} (h : α) (t : fin n → α) : fin n.succ → α :=
fin.cons h t
notation `![` l:(foldr `, ` (h t, vec_cons h t) vec_empty `]`) := l
/-- `vec_head v` gives the first entry of the vector `v` -/
def vec_head {n : ℕ} (v : fin n.succ → α) : α :=
v 0
/-- `vec_tail v` gives a vector consisting of all entries of `v` except the first -/
def vec_tail {n : ℕ} (v : fin n.succ → α) : fin n → α :=
v ∘ fin.succ
variables {m n : ℕ}
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a vector `fin n → α`, for example:
```
#eval ![1, 2] + ![3, 4] -- ![4, 6]
```
-/
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (fin n → α) :=
{ repr := λ f, "![" ++ (string.intercalate ", " ((list.fin_range n).map (λ n, repr (f n)))) ++ "]" }
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a `fin`-indexed matrix, for example:
```
#eval ![![1, 2], ![3, 4]] + ![![3, 4], ![5, 6]] -- ![![4, 6], ![8, 10]]
```
-/
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (matrix (fin m) (fin n) α) :=
(by apply_instance : has_repr (fin m → fin n → α))
end matrix_notation
variables {m n o : ℕ} {m' n' o' : Type*}
lemma empty_eq (v : fin 0 → α) : v = ![] :=
by { ext i, fin_cases i }
section val
@[simp] lemma head_fin_const (a : α) : vec_head (λ (i : fin (n + 1)), a) = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_val_zero (x : α) (u : fin m → α) : vec_cons x u 0 = x := rfl
lemma cons_val_zero' (h : 0 < m.succ) (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
vec_cons x u ⟨0, h⟩ = x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_val_succ (x : α) (u : fin m → α) (i : fin m) :
vec_cons x u i.succ = u i :=
by simp [vec_cons]
@[simp] lemma cons_val_succ' {i : ℕ} (h : i.succ < m.succ) (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
vec_cons x u ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = u ⟨i, nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ :=
by simp only [vec_cons, fin.cons, fin.cases_succ']
@[simp] lemma head_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
vec_head (vec_cons x u) = x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
vec_tail (vec_cons x u) = u :=
by { ext, simp [vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma empty_val' {n' : Type*} (j : n') :
(λ i, (![] : fin 0 → n' → α) i j) = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : matrix (fin m) n' α) (i j) :
vec_cons v B i j = vec_cons (v j) (λ i, B i j) i :=
by { refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
@[simp] lemma head_val' (B : matrix (fin m.succ) n' α) (j : n') :
vec_head (λ i, B i j) = vec_head B j := rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_val' (B : matrix (fin m.succ) n' α) (j : n') :
vec_tail (λ i, B i j) = λ i, vec_tail B i j :=
by { ext, simp [vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma cons_head_tail (u : fin m.succ → α) :
vec_cons (vec_head u) (vec_tail u) = u :=
fin.cons_self_tail _
@[simp] lemma range_cons (x : α) (u : fin n → α) :
set.range (vec_cons x u) = {x} ∪ set.range u :=
set.ext $ λ y, by simp [fin.exists_fin_succ, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma range_empty (u : fin 0 → α) : set.range u = ∅ :=
set.range_eq_empty _
@[simp] lemma vec_cons_const (a : α) : vec_cons a (λ k : fin n, a) = λ _, a :=
funext $ fin.forall_fin_succ.2 ⟨rfl, cons_val_succ _ _⟩
lemma vec_single_eq_const (a : α) : ![a] = λ _, a :=
funext $ unique.forall_iff.2 rfl
/-- `![a, b, ...] 1` is equal to `b`.
The simplifier needs a special lemma for length `≥ 2`, in addition to
`cons_val_succ`, because `1 : fin 1 = 0 : fin 1`.
-/
@[simp] lemma cons_val_one (x : α) (u : fin m.succ → α) :
vec_cons x u 1 = vec_head u :=
by { rw [← fin.succ_zero_eq_one, cons_val_succ], refl }
@[simp] lemma cons_val_fin_one (x : α) (u : fin 0 → α) (i : fin 1) :
vec_cons x u i = x :=
by { fin_cases i, refl }
lemma cons_fin_one (x : α) (u : fin 0 → α) : vec_cons x u = (λ _, x) :=
funext (cons_val_fin_one x u)
/-! ### Numeral (`bit0` and `bit1`) indices
The following definitions and `simp` lemmas are to allow any
numeral-indexed element of a vector given with matrix notation to
be extracted by `simp` (even when the numeral is larger than the
number of elements in the vector, which is taken modulo that number
of elements by virtue of the semantics of `bit0` and `bit1` and of
addition on `fin n`).
-/
@[simp] lemma empty_append (v : fin n → α) : fin.append (zero_add _).symm ![] v = v :=
by { ext, simp [fin.append] }
@[simp] lemma cons_append (ho : o + 1 = m + 1 + n) (x : α) (u : fin m → α) (v : fin n → α) :
fin.append ho (vec_cons x u) v =
vec_cons x (fin.append (by rwa [add_assoc, add_comm 1, ←add_assoc,
add_right_cancel_iff] at ho) u v) :=
begin
ext i,
simp_rw [fin.append],
split_ifs with h,
{ rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩,
{ simp },
{ simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_lt_add_iff_right, fin.coe_mk] at h,
simp [h] } },
{ rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩,
{ simpa using h },
{ rw [not_lt, fin.coe_mk, nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_le_add_iff_right] at h,
simp [h] } }
end
/-- `vec_alt0 v` gives a vector with half the length of `v`, with
only alternate elements (even-numbered). -/
def vec_alt0 (hm : m = n + n) (v : fin m → α) (k : fin n) : α :=
v ⟨(k : ℕ) + k, hm.symm ▸ add_lt_add k.property k.property⟩
/-- `vec_alt1 v` gives a vector with half the length of `v`, with
only alternate elements (odd-numbered). -/
def vec_alt1 (hm : m = n + n) (v : fin m → α) (k : fin n) : α :=
v ⟨(k : ℕ) + k + 1, hm.symm ▸ nat.add_succ_lt_add k.property k.property⟩
lemma vec_alt0_append (v : fin n → α) : vec_alt0 rfl (fin.append rfl v v) = v ∘ bit0 :=
begin
ext i,
simp_rw [function.comp, bit0, vec_alt0, fin.append],
split_ifs with h; congr,
{ rw fin.coe_mk at h,
simp only [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_add, fin.coe_mk],
exact (nat.mod_eq_of_lt h).symm },
{ rw [fin.coe_mk, not_lt] at h,
simp only [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_add, fin.coe_mk, nat.mod_eq_sub_mod h],
refine (nat.mod_eq_of_lt _).symm,
rw sub_lt_iff_left h,
exact add_lt_add i.property i.property }
end
lemma vec_alt1_append (v : fin (n + 1) → α) : vec_alt1 rfl (fin.append rfl v v) = v ∘ bit1 :=
begin
ext i,
simp_rw [function.comp, vec_alt1, fin.append],
cases n,
{ simp, congr },
{ split_ifs with h; simp_rw [bit1, bit0]; congr,
{ simp only [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_add, fin.coe_mk],
rw fin.coe_mk at h,
rw fin.coe_one,
rw nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.lt_of_succ_lt h),
rw nat.mod_eq_of_lt h },
{ rw [fin.coe_mk, not_lt] at h,
simp only [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_add, fin.coe_mk, nat.mod_add_mod, fin.coe_one,
nat.mod_eq_sub_mod h],
refine (nat.mod_eq_of_lt _).symm,
rw sub_lt_iff_left h,
exact nat.add_succ_lt_add i.property i.property } }
end
@[simp] lemma vec_head_vec_alt0 (hm : (m + 2) = (n + 1) + (n + 1)) (v : fin (m + 2) → α) :
vec_head (vec_alt0 hm v) = v 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma vec_head_vec_alt1 (hm : (m + 2) = (n + 1) + (n + 1)) (v : fin (m + 2) → α) :
vec_head (vec_alt1 hm v) = v 1 :=
by simp [vec_head, vec_alt1]
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_bit0_eq_alt0 (x : α) (u : fin n → α) (i : fin (n + 1)) :
vec_cons x u (bit0 i) = vec_alt0 rfl (fin.append rfl (vec_cons x u) (vec_cons x u)) i :=
by rw vec_alt0_append
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_bit1_eq_alt1 (x : α) (u : fin n → α) (i : fin (n + 1)) :
vec_cons x u (bit1 i) = vec_alt1 rfl (fin.append rfl (vec_cons x u) (vec_cons x u)) i :=
by rw vec_alt1_append
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_alt0 (h : m + 1 + 1 = (n + 1) + (n + 1)) (x y : α) (u : fin m → α) :
vec_alt0 h (vec_cons x (vec_cons y u)) = vec_cons x (vec_alt0
(by rwa [add_assoc n, add_comm 1, ←add_assoc, ←add_assoc, add_right_cancel_iff,
add_right_cancel_iff] at h) u) :=
begin
ext i,
simp_rw [vec_alt0],
rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩,
{ refl },
{ simp [vec_alt0, nat.add_succ, nat.succ_add] }
end
-- Although proved by simp, extracting element 8 of a five-element
-- vector does not work by simp unless this lemma is present.
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_alt0 (α) {h} : vec_alt0 h (![] : fin 0 → α) = ![] :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_alt1 (h : m + 1 + 1 = (n + 1) + (n + 1)) (x y : α) (u : fin m → α) :
vec_alt1 h (vec_cons x (vec_cons y u)) = vec_cons y (vec_alt1
(by rwa [add_assoc n, add_comm 1, ←add_assoc, ←add_assoc, add_right_cancel_iff,
add_right_cancel_iff] at h) u) :=
begin
ext i,
simp_rw [vec_alt1],
rcases i with ⟨⟨⟩ | i, hi⟩,
{ refl },
{ simp [vec_alt1, nat.add_succ, nat.succ_add] }
end
-- Although proved by simp, extracting element 9 of a five-element
-- vector does not work by simp unless this lemma is present.
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_alt1 (α) {h} : vec_alt1 h (![] : fin 0 → α) = ![] :=
by simp
end val
section dot_product
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_empty (v w : fin 0 → α) :
dot_product v w = 0 := finset.sum_empty
@[simp] lemma cons_dot_product (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (w : fin n.succ → α) :
dot_product (vec_cons x v) w = x * vec_head w + dot_product v (vec_tail w) :=
by simp [dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ, vec_head, vec_tail]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (x : α) (w : fin n → α) :
dot_product v (vec_cons x w) = vec_head v * x + dot_product (vec_tail v) w :=
by simp [dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ, vec_head, vec_tail]
end dot_product
section col_row
@[simp] lemma col_empty (v : fin 0 → α) : col v = vec_empty :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma col_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
col (vec_cons x u) = vec_cons (λ _, x) (col u) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_head, vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma row_empty : row (vec_empty : fin 0 → α) = λ _, vec_empty :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma row_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
row (vec_cons x u) = λ _, vec_cons x u :=
by { ext, refl }
end col_row
section transpose
@[simp] lemma transpose_empty_rows (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) : Aᵀ = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma transpose_empty_cols : (![] : matrix (fin 0) m' α)ᵀ = λ i, ![] :=
funext (λ i, empty_eq _)
@[simp] lemma cons_transpose (v : n' → α) (A : matrix (fin m) n' α) :
(vec_cons v A)ᵀ = λ i, vec_cons (v i) (Aᵀ i) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ j; simp }
@[simp] lemma head_transpose (A : matrix m' (fin n.succ) α) : vec_head (Aᵀ) = vec_head ∘ A :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_transpose (A : matrix m' (fin n.succ) α) : vec_tail (Aᵀ) = (vec_tail ∘ A)ᵀ :=
by { ext i j, refl }
end transpose
section mul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_mul [fintype n'] (A : matrix (fin 0) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) :
A ⬝ B = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma empty_mul_empty (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) (B : matrix (fin 0) o' α) :
A ⬝ B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_empty [fintype n'] (A : matrix m' n' α) (B : matrix n' (fin 0) α) :
A ⬝ B = λ _, ![] :=
funext (λ _, empty_eq _)
lemma mul_val_succ [fintype n']
(A : matrix (fin m.succ) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) (i : fin m) (j : o') :
(A ⬝ B) i.succ j = (vec_tail A ⬝ B) i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_mul [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : matrix (fin m) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) :
vec_cons v A ⬝ B = vec_cons (vec_mul v B) (A ⬝ B) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i, { refl }, simp [mul_val_succ] }
end mul
section vec_mul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_mul (v : fin 0 → α) (B : matrix (fin 0) o' α) :
vec_mul v B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_empty [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (B : matrix n' (fin 0) α) :
vec_mul v B = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_mul (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (B : matrix (fin n.succ) o' α) :
vec_mul (vec_cons x v) B = x • (vec_head B) + vec_mul v (vec_tail B) :=
by { ext i, simp [vec_mul] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (w : o' → α) (B : matrix (fin n) o' α) :
vec_mul v (vec_cons w B) = vec_head v • w + vec_mul (vec_tail v) B :=
by { ext i, simp [vec_mul] }
end vec_mul
section mul_vec
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_mul_vec [fintype n'] (A : matrix (fin 0) n' α) (v : n' → α) :
mul_vec A v = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_empty (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) (v : fin 0 → α) :
mul_vec A v = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_mul_vec [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : fin m → n' → α) (w : n' → α) :
mul_vec (vec_cons v A) w = vec_cons (dot_product v w) (mul_vec A w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_cons {α} [comm_semiring α] (A : m' → (fin n.succ) → α) (x : α)
(v : fin n → α) :
mul_vec A (vec_cons x v) = (x • vec_head ∘ A) + mul_vec (vec_tail ∘ A) v :=
by { ext i, simp [mul_vec, mul_comm] }
end mul_vec
section vec_mul_vec
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_mul_vec (v : fin 0 → α) (w : n' → α) :
vec_mul_vec v w = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_vec_empty (v : m' → α) (w : fin 0 → α) :
vec_mul_vec v w = λ _, ![] :=
funext (λ i, empty_eq _)
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_mul_vec (x : α) (v : fin m → α) (w : n' → α) :
vec_mul_vec (vec_cons x v) w = vec_cons (x • w) (vec_mul_vec v w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_vec_cons (v : m' → α) (x : α) (w : fin n → α) :
vec_mul_vec v (vec_cons x w) = λ i, v i • vec_cons x w :=
by { ext i j, simp [vec_mul_vec]}
end vec_mul_vec
section smul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma smul_empty (x : α) (v : fin 0 → α) : x • v = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma smul_mat_empty {m' : Type*} (x : α) (A : fin 0 → m' → α) : x • A = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma smul_cons (x y : α) (v : fin n → α) :
x • vec_cons y v = vec_cons (x * y) (x • v) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
@[simp] lemma smul_mat_cons (x : α) (v : n' → α) (A : matrix (fin m) n' α) :
x • vec_cons v A = vec_cons (x • v) (x • A) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
end smul
section add
variables [has_add α]
@[simp] lemma empty_add_empty (v w : fin 0 → α) : v + w = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma cons_add (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (w : fin n.succ → α) :
vec_cons x v + w = vec_cons (x + vec_head w) (v + vec_tail w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_head, vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma add_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (y : α) (w : fin n → α) :
v + vec_cons y w = vec_cons (vec_head v + y) (vec_tail v + w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_head, vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma head_add (a b : fin n.succ → α) : vec_head (a + b) = vec_head a + vec_head b := rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_add (a b : fin n.succ → α) : vec_tail (a + b) = vec_tail a + vec_tail b := rfl
end add
section sub
variables [has_sub α]
@[simp] lemma empty_sub_empty (v w : fin 0 → α) : v - w = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma cons_sub (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (w : fin n.succ → α) :
vec_cons x v - w = vec_cons (x - vec_head w) (v - vec_tail w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_head, vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma sub_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (y : α) (w : fin n → α) :
v - vec_cons y w = vec_cons (vec_head v - y) (vec_tail v - w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_head, vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma head_sub (a b : fin n.succ → α) : vec_head (a - b) = vec_head a - vec_head b := rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_sub (a b : fin n.succ → α) : vec_tail (a - b) = vec_tail a - vec_tail b := rfl
end sub
section zero
variables [has_zero α]
@[simp] lemma zero_empty : (0 : fin 0 → α) = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma cons_zero_zero : vec_cons (0 : α) (0 : fin n → α) = 0 :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i, { refl }, simp }
@[simp] lemma head_zero : vec_head (0 : fin n.succ → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_zero : vec_tail (0 : fin n.succ → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_eq_zero_iff {v : fin n → α} {x : α} :
vec_cons x v = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ v = 0 :=
⟨ λ h, ⟨ congr_fun h 0, by { convert congr_arg vec_tail h, simp } ⟩,
λ ⟨hx, hv⟩, by simp [hx, hv] ⟩
open_locale classical
lemma cons_nonzero_iff {v : fin n → α} {x : α} :
vec_cons x v ≠ 0 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∨ v ≠ 0) :=
⟨ λ h, not_and_distrib.mp (h ∘ cons_eq_zero_iff.mpr),
λ h, mt cons_eq_zero_iff.mp (not_and_distrib.mpr h) ⟩
end zero
section neg
variables [has_neg α]
@[simp] lemma neg_empty (v : fin 0 → α) : -v = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma neg_cons (x : α) (v : fin n → α) :
-(vec_cons x v) = vec_cons (-x) (-v) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
@[simp] lemma head_neg (a : fin n.succ → α) : vec_head (-a) = -vec_head a := rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_neg (a : fin n.succ → α) : vec_tail (-a) = -vec_tail a := rfl
end neg
section minor
@[simp] lemma minor_empty (A : matrix m' n' α) (row : fin 0 → m') (col : o' → n') :
minor A row col = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma minor_cons_row (A : matrix m' n' α) (i : m') (row : fin m → m') (col : o' → n') :
minor A (vec_cons i row) col = vec_cons (λ j, A i (col j)) (minor A row col) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [minor] }
end minor
end matrix
|
dae07152693644608827b75c5d019383ff005e3b | 3618c6e11aa822fd542440674dfb9a7b9921dba0 | /scratch/coprod/free_group.lean | 3c47af6e9857a644f994c1af124174e811d0b08f | [] | no_license | ChrisHughes24/single_relation | 99ceedcc02d236ce46d6c65d72caa669857533c5 | 057e157a59de6d0e43b50fcb537d66792ec20450 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,652,062,698 | 1,683,360,089,000 | 1,683,360,089,000 | 279,346,432 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,607 | lean | import data.list.chain data.int.basic tactic data.list.basic
variables {α : Type*}
open list
def reduced (l : list (α × ℤ)) : Prop :=
l.chain' (λ a b, a.1 ≠ b.1) ∧ ∀ a : α × ℤ, a ∈ l → a.2 ≠ 0
@[simp] lemma reduced_nil : reduced ([] : list (α × ℤ)) :=
⟨list.chain'_nil, λ _, false.elim⟩
lemma reduced_of_reduced_cons {a : α × ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)}
(h : reduced (a :: l)) : reduced l :=
⟨(list.chain'_cons'.1 h.1).2, λ b hb, h.2 _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ hb)⟩
lemma reduced_cons_of_reduced_cons {a : α} {i j : ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)}
(h : reduced ((a, i) :: l)) (hj : j ≠ 0) : reduced ((a, j) :: l) :=
⟨chain'_cons'.2 (chain'_cons'.1 h.1),
begin
rintros ⟨b, k⟩ hb,
cases (mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 hb with hb hb,
{ cc },
{ exact h.2 _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ hb) }
end⟩
lemma reduced_cons_cons {a b : α} {i j : ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)} (hab : a ≠ b) (hi : i ≠ 0)
(hbl : reduced ((b, j) :: l)) : reduced ((a, i) :: (b, j) :: l) :=
⟨chain'_cons.2 ⟨hab, hbl.1⟩,
begin
rintros ⟨c, k⟩ hc,
cases (mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 hc with hc hc,
{ cc },
{ exact hbl.2 _ hc }
end⟩
lemma reduced_reverse {l : list (α × ℤ)} (h : reduced l) : reduced l.reverse :=
⟨chain'_reverse.2 $ by {convert h.1, simp [function.funext_iff, eq_comm] },
by simpa using h.2⟩
@[simp] lemma reduced_reverse_iff {l : list (α × ℤ)} : reduced l.reverse ↔ reduced l :=
⟨λ h, by convert reduced_reverse h; simp, reduced_reverse⟩
variable (α)
def free_group : Type* := {l : list (α × ℤ) // reduced l}
namespace free_group
instance : has_one (free_group α) := ⟨⟨[], trivial, by simp⟩⟩
variables {α} [decidable_eq α]
def rcons : α × ℤ → list (α × ℤ) → list (α × ℤ)
| a [] := [a]
| a (b::l) :=
if a.1 = b.1
then let k := a.2 + b.2 in
if k = 0
then l
else (a.1, k) :: l
else a :: b :: l
-- def rconcat (a : α × ℤ) (l : list (α × ℤ)) : list (α × ℤ) :=
-- (rcons a l.reverse).reverse
def reduce : list (α × ℤ) → list (α × ℤ)
| [] := []
| (a :: l) := if a.2 = 0 then reduce l else rcons a (reduce l)
lemma reduced_rcons : ∀ {a : α × ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)},
a.2 ≠ 0 → reduced l → reduced (rcons a l)
| (a, i) [] ha h := ⟨list.chain'_singleton _, by simp [rcons]; cc⟩
| (a, i) ((b, j) :: l) ha h := begin
simp [rcons],
split_ifs,
{ exact reduced_of_reduced_cons h },
{ subst h_1,
exact reduced_cons_of_reduced_cons h h_2 },
{ exact reduced_cons_cons h_1 ha h }
end
-- lemma reduced_rconcat {a : α × ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)}
-- (ha : a.2 ≠ 0) (hl : reduced l) : reduced (rconcat a l) :=
-- begin
-- rw [rconcat, reduced_reverse_iff],
-- exact reduced_rcons ha (reduced_reverse hl)
-- end
lemma reduced_reduce : ∀ l : list (α × ℤ), reduced (reduce l)
| [] := reduced_nil
| (a::l) := begin
rw reduce,
split_ifs,
{ exact reduced_reduce l },
{ exact reduced_rcons h (reduced_reduce l) }
end
lemma rcons_eq_cons : ∀ {a : α × ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)},
reduced (a :: l) → rcons a l = a :: l
| a [] h := rfl
| a (b::l) h := if_neg (chain'_cons.1 h.1).1
-- lemma rconcat_eq_concat {a : α × ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)}
-- (h : reduced (l ++ [a])) : rconcat a l = l ++ [a] :=
-- begin
-- rw [rconcat, rcons_eq_cons], simp,
-- convert reduced_reverse h, simp,
-- end
lemma rcons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons : ∀ {a : α × ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)},
a.2 ≠ 0 → rcons a (reduce l) = reduce (a :: l)
| a [] ha := by simp [rcons, reduce, ha]
| a (b::l) ha := begin
rw [reduce],
split_ifs,
{ rw [reduce, if_neg ha, reduce, if_pos h] },
{ rw [reduce, if_neg ha, reduce, if_neg h] }
end
-- inductive rel : list (α × ℤ) → list (α × ℤ) → Prop
-- | refl : ∀ l, rel l l
-- | zero : ∀ {a : α}, rel [(a, 0)] []
-- | add : ∀ {a i j}, rel [(a, i), (a, j)] [(a, i + j)]
-- | append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ l₄}, rel l₁ l₂ → rel l₃ l₄ → rel (l₁ ++ l₃) (l₂ ++ l₄)
-- | symm : ∀ {l₁ l₂}, rel l₁ l₂ → rel l₂ l₁
-- | trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃}, rel l₁ l₂ → rel l₂ l₃ → rel l₁ l₃
-- attribute [refl] rel.refl
-- attribute [symm] rel.symm
-- attribute [trans] rel.trans
-- -- @[refl] lemma rel.refl : ∀ l : list (α × ℤ), rel l l := sorry
-- lemma rel_rcons_cons : ∀ (a : α × ℤ) (l : list (α × ℤ)),
-- rel (rcons a l) (a::l)
-- | a [] := rel.refl _
-- | (a, i) ((b,j)::l) := begin
-- rw rcons,
-- split_ifs,
-- { replace h : a = b := h, subst h,
-- show rel ([] ++ l) ([(a,i), (a, j)] ++ l),
-- refine rel.append _ (rel.refl _),
-- symmetry,
-- exact rel.add.trans (h_1.symm ▸ rel.zero) },
-- { replace h : a = b := h, subst h,
-- show rel ([(a, i + j)] ++ l) ([(a, i), (a, j)] ++ l),
-- exact rel.append rel.add.symm (rel.refl _) },
-- { refl },
-- end
-- lemma rel_cons_of_rel {l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)} (h : rel l₁ l₂) (a : α × ℤ) :
-- rel (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) :=
-- show rel ([a] ++ l₁) ([a] ++ l₂), from rel.append (rel.refl _) h
-- lemma rel_rcons_cons_of_rel {a : α × ℤ} {l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)} (h : rel l₁ l₂) :
-- rel (rcons a l₁) (a ::l₂) :=
-- (rel_rcons_cons a l₁).trans (rel_cons_of_rel h _)
-- lemma rel_reduce : ∀ l : list (α × ℤ), rel l (reduce l)
-- | [] := rel.refl _
-- | ((a, i)::l) := begin
-- rw reduce,
-- split_ifs,
-- { replace h : i = 0 := h, subst h,
-- show rel ([(a, 0)] ++ l) ([] ++ reduce l),
-- exact rel.append rel.zero (rel_reduce _) },
-- { exact (rel_rcons_cons_of_rel (rel_reduce _).symm).symm }
-- end
-- lemma reduce_eq_reduce_of_rel {l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)} (h : rel l₁ l₂) : reduce l₁ = reduce l₂ :=
-- begin
-- induction h,
-- { refl },
-- { simp [reduce] },
-- { simp only [reduce],
-- split_ifs,
-- { refl },
-- { simp * at * },
-- { exfalso, omega },
-- { simp [rcons, *] },
-- { exfalso, omega },
-- { simp [rcons, *] },
-- { simp [rcons, *] },
-- { simp [rcons, *] } },
-- { }
-- end
lemma reduce_eq_self_of_reduced : ∀ {l : list (α × ℤ)}, reduced l → reduce l = l
| [] h := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw [← rcons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons (h.2 a (mem_cons_self _ _)),
reduce_eq_self_of_reduced (reduced_of_reduced_cons h), rcons_eq_cons h]
lemma rcons_eq_reduce_cons {a : α × ℤ} {l : list (α × ℤ)}
(ha : a.2 ≠ 0) (hl : reduced l) : rcons a l = reduce (a :: l) :=
by rw [← rcons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons ha, reduce_eq_self_of_reduced hl]
@[simp] lemma reduce_reduce (l : list (α × ℤ)) : reduce (reduce l) = reduce l :=
reduce_eq_self_of_reduced (reduced_reduce l)
@[simp] lemma reduce_cons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons (a : α × ℤ) (l : list (α × ℤ)) :
reduce (a :: reduce l) = reduce (a :: l) :=
if ha : a.2 = 0 then by rw [reduce, if_pos ha, reduce, if_pos ha, reduce_reduce]
else by rw [← rcons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons ha, ← rcons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons ha,
reduce_reduce]
lemma length_rcons_le : ∀ (a : α × ℤ) (l : list (α × ℤ)),
(rcons a l).length ≤ (a::l : list _).length
| a [] := le_refl _
| (a,i) ((b,j)::l) := begin
simp [rcons],
split_ifs,
{ linarith },
{ simp },
{ simp }
end
lemma length_reduce_le : ∀ (l : list (α × ℤ)),
(reduce l).length ≤ l.length
| [] := le_refl _
| [a] := by { simp [reduce], split_ifs; simp [rcons] }
| (a::b::l) := begin
simp only [reduce, rcons],
split_ifs,
{ exact le_trans (length_reduce_le _)
(le_trans (nat.le_succ _) (nat.le_succ _)) },
{ exact le_trans (length_rcons_le _ _) (nat.succ_le_succ
(le_trans (length_reduce_le _) (nat.le_succ _))) },
{ exact le_trans (length_rcons_le _ _) (nat.succ_le_succ
(le_trans (length_reduce_le _) (nat.le_succ _))) },
{ exact le_trans (length_rcons_le _ _) (nat.succ_le_succ
(le_trans (length_rcons_le _ _) (nat.succ_le_succ
(length_reduce_le _)))) }
end
lemma length_rcons_lt_or_eq_rcons : ∀ (a : α × ℤ) (l : list (α × ℤ)),
(rcons a l).length < (a :: l : list _).length ∨ rcons a l = (a::l)
| a [] := or.inr rfl
| a (b::l) := begin
simp only [rcons],
split_ifs,
{ exact or.inl (nat.lt_succ_of_le (nat.le_succ _)) },
{ exact or.inl (nat.lt_succ_self _) },
{ simp }
end
lemma length_reduce_lt_or_eq_reduce : ∀ (l : list (α × ℤ)),
(reduce l).length < l.length ∨ reduce l = l
| [] := or.inr rfl
| (a::l) := begin
simp only [reduce],
split_ifs,
{ exact or.inl (nat.lt_succ_of_le (length_reduce_le _)) },
{ cases length_rcons_lt_or_eq_rcons a (reduce l) with h h,
{ exact or.inl (lt_of_lt_of_le h (nat.succ_le_succ (length_reduce_le _))) },
{ rw h,
cases length_reduce_lt_or_eq_reduce l with h h,
{ exact or.inl (nat.succ_lt_succ h) },
{ rw h, right, refl } } }
end
lemma rcons_append : ∀ {a b : α × ℤ} {l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)},
rcons a ((b::l₁) ++ l₂) = rcons a (b::l₁) ++ l₂
| a b [] l₂ := begin
simp [rcons], split_ifs; simp
end
| a b (c::l₁) l₂ := begin
rw [cons_append, rcons],
dsimp,
split_ifs,
{ simp [rcons, *] },
{ simp [rcons, *] },
{ simp [rcons, *] }
end
lemma rcons_rcons_of_add_eq_zero {a : α} {i j : ℤ} : ∀ {l : list (α × ℤ)},
i + j = 0 → reduced l → rcons (a, i) (rcons (a, j) l) = l
| [] hij hl := by simp [rcons, hij]
| ((b, k)::l) hij hl := begin
simp only [rcons],
split_ifs,
{ rw [← rcons_eq_cons hl, show a = b, from h, show i = k, by omega] },
{ simp only [rcons, if_pos rfl],
rw [if_neg, ← add_assoc, hij, zero_add, show a = b, from h],
have hk0 : k ≠ 0 := hl.2 (b, k) (mem_cons_self _ _),
omega },
{ rw [rcons, if_pos rfl], dsimp, rw [if_pos hij] }
end
lemma rcons_rcons_of_add_ne_zero {a : α} {i j : ℤ} : ∀ {l : list (α × ℤ)},
i + j ≠ 0 → i ≠ 0 → reduced l → rcons (a, i) (rcons (a, j) l) = rcons (a, i + j) l
| [] hij hi hl := by simp [rcons, hij]
| [(b, k)] hij hi hl := begin
simp only [rcons],
split_ifs,
{ exfalso, omega },
{ simp [rcons], omega },
{ simp only [rcons, ← add_assoc, *, if_pos rfl] },
{ simp only [rcons, if_pos rfl, ← add_assoc, *],
simp },
{ simp [rcons, if_neg hij, if_pos rfl] }
end
| ((b, k)::(c, m)::l) hij hi hl := begin
have hbc : b ≠ c, from (chain'_cons.1 hl.1).1,
simp only [rcons],
split_ifs,
{ exfalso, omega },
{ simp [*, rcons] at *, omega },
{ simp [*, rcons, ← add_assoc] at * },
{ simp [*, rcons, ← add_assoc] },
{ simp [*, rcons] }
end
lemma reduce_rcons : ∀ {a : α × ℤ} (l : list (α × ℤ)), a.2 ≠ 0 →
reduce (rcons a l) = rcons a (reduce l)
| a [] ha := by simp [rcons, reduce, ha]
| (a, i) [(b, j)] hi := begin
replace hi : i ≠ 0 := hi,
simp only [reduce, rcons],
split_ifs; simp [reduce, rcons, *] at *
end
| (a,i) ((b,j)::l) hi := begin
simp only [rcons],
split_ifs,
{ rw [reduce, if_neg, h,
rcons_rcons_of_add_eq_zero h_1 (reduced_reduce _)],
omega },
{ simp only [reduce, if_neg h_1, reduce],
split_ifs,
{ simp [h_2] },
{ rw [h, rcons_rcons_of_add_ne_zero h_1 hi (reduced_reduce _)] } },
{ rw [rcons_eq_reduce_cons hi (reduced_reduce _), reduce_cons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons] }
end
@[simp] lemma reduce_reduce_append_eq_reduce_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)),
reduce (reduce l₁ ++ l₂) = reduce (l₁ ++ l₂)
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := begin
simp only [reduce, cons_append],
split_ifs with ha ha,
{ exact reduce_reduce_append_eq_reduce_append _ _ },
{ rw [← reduce_reduce_append_eq_reduce_append l₁ l₂],
induction h : reduce l₁,
{ simp [rcons, rcons_eq_reduce_cons ha (reduced_reduce _)] },
{ rw [← rcons_append, reduce_rcons _ ha] } }
end
@[simp] lemma reduce_append_reduce_eq_reduce_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)},
reduce (l₁ ++ reduce l₂) = reduce (l₁ ++ l₂)
| [] l₂ := by simp
| (a::l₁) l₂ := by rw [cons_append, ← reduce_cons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons,
reduce_append_reduce_eq_reduce_append,
reduce_cons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons, cons_append]
/- TODO: Speed up, not the best definition, no need to reduce entire first list. -/
def mul_aux : list (α × ℤ) → list (α × ℤ) → list (α × ℤ)
| [] l₂ := l₂
| (a :: l₁) l₂ := rcons a (mul_aux l₁ l₂)
lemma reduced_mul_aux : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)}, reduced l₁ →
reduced l₂ → reduced (mul_aux l₁ l₂)
| [] l₂ _ h := h
| (a::l₁) l₂ h₁ h₂ := reduced_rcons
(h₁.2 _ (mem_cons_self _ _))
(reduced_mul_aux (reduced_of_reduced_cons h₁) h₂)
lemma mul_aux_eq_reduce_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list (α × ℤ)}, reduced l₁ →
reduced l₂ → mul_aux l₁ l₂ = reduce (l₁ ++ l₂)
| [] l₂ _ h := by simp [reduce, mul_aux, reduce_eq_self_of_reduced h]
| (a::l₁) l₂ h₁ h₂ :=
by rw [mul_aux, mul_aux_eq_reduce_append (reduced_of_reduced_cons h₁) h₂,
rcons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons (h₁.2 a (mem_cons_self _ _)), cons_append]
lemma mul_aux_assoc {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list (α × ℤ)}
(h₁ : reduced l₁) (h₂ : reduced l₂) (h₃ : reduced l₃) :
mul_aux (mul_aux l₁ l₂) l₃ = mul_aux l₁ (mul_aux l₂ l₃) :=
begin
rw [mul_aux_eq_reduce_append h₁ h₂, mul_aux_eq_reduce_append h₂ h₃,
mul_aux_eq_reduce_append (reduced_reduce _) h₃,
mul_aux_eq_reduce_append h₁ (reduced_reduce _)],
simp [append_assoc]
end
instance : has_mul (free_group α) :=
⟨λ a b : free_group α, ⟨mul_aux a.1 b.1, reduced_mul_aux a.2 b.2⟩⟩
def inv_aux (l : list (α × ℤ)) : list (α × ℤ) :=
l.reverse.map (λ a, (a.1, -a.2))
lemma inv_aux_cons (a : α) (i : ℤ) (l : list (α × ℤ)) :
inv_aux ((a, i) :: l) = inv_aux l ++ [(a, -i)] :=
by simp [inv_aux]
lemma reduced_inv_aux {l : list (α × ℤ)} (hl : reduced l) : reduced (inv_aux l) :=
⟨(list.chain'_map _).2 (list.chain'_reverse.2 begin
convert hl.1, simp [function.funext_iff, eq_comm],
end), begin
rintros ⟨a, i⟩ ha,
have := hl.2 (a, -i),
finish [inv_aux]
end⟩
instance : has_inv (free_group α) :=
⟨λ a, ⟨inv_aux a.1, reduced_inv_aux a.2⟩⟩
lemma mul_aux_inv_aux_cancel : ∀ {l : list (α × ℤ)}, reduced l →
mul_aux l (inv_aux l) = []
| [] hl := rfl
| ((a, i)::l) hal :=
have hi : i ≠ 0, from hal.2 (a, i) (mem_cons_self _ _),
have hl : reduced l, from reduced_of_reduced_cons hal,
begin
rw [mul_aux_eq_reduce_append hal (reduced_inv_aux hal), inv_aux_cons, cons_append,
← append_assoc, ← reduce_cons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons,
← reduce_reduce_append_eq_reduce_append, reduce_cons_reduce_eq_reduce_cons,
← mul_aux_eq_reduce_append hl (reduced_inv_aux hl), mul_aux_inv_aux_cancel hl],
simp [reduce, hi, rcons]
end
instance : group (free_group α) :=
{ mul := (*),
inv := has_inv.inv,
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, subtype.eq (mul_aux_assoc a.2 b.2 c.2),
one_mul := λ ⟨_, _⟩, rfl,
mul_one := λ ⟨_, _⟩, sorry,
mul_left_inv := sorry }
lemma mul_def (a b : free_group α) : a * b = ⟨mul_aux a.1 b.1, reduced_mul_aux a.2 b.2⟩ := rfl
def of (a : α) : free_group α := ⟨[(a, 1)], by simp [reduced] { contextual := tt }⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma induction_on {P : free_group α → Prop}
(g : free_group α)
(h1 : P 1)
(atom : ∀ a, P (of a))
(atom_inv : ∀ a, P (of a)⁻¹)
(hmul : ∀ a g, P g → P (of a * g)) :
P g :=
begin
cases g with l hl,
induction l with a l ihl,
{ exact h1 },
{ cases a with a i,
induction i using int.induction_on with i ihi i ihi,
{ simpa [reduced] using hl },
{ by_cases hi : i = 0,
{ subst i,
convert hmul a ⟨l, reduced_of_reduced_cons hl⟩ (ihl (reduced_of_reduced_cons hl)),
rw [mul_aux_eq_reduce_append (of a).2 (reduced_of_reduced_cons hl), of,
cons_append, nil_append, ← reduce_eq_self_of_reduced hl, int.coe_nat_zero, zero_add] },
{ have hil : reduced ((a, i) :: l),
from reduced_cons_of_reduced_cons hl (by norm_cast; exact hi),
convert hmul a ⟨(a, i) :: l, hil⟩ (ihi hil),
rw [mul_aux_eq_reduce_append (of a).2 hil, of, cons_append, nil_append,
reduce, if_neg, reduce, if_neg, rcons_rcons_of_add_ne_zero],
}, }
}
end
variables {β : Type*} [decidable_eq β] (e : α → β)
def map : free_group α →* free_group β :=
{ to_fun := λ ⟨l, hl⟩, ⟨l.map e, _⟩ }
end free_group
|
dc7798b568a8172410eec9a7a76ae25c288162b0 | 4f643cce24b2d005aeeb5004c2316a8d6cc7f3b1 | /omin/presheaf3.lean | 9e89d58e103e24240c7f3e9f3553e46162f66509 | [] | no_license | rwbarton/lean-omin | da209ed061d64db65a8f7f71f198064986f30eb9 | fd733c6d95ef6f4743aae97de5e15df79877c00e | refs/heads/master | 1,674,408,673,325 | 1,607,343,535,000 | 1,607,343,535,000 | 285,150,399 | 9 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 791 | lean | import .presheaf2
universes v u
namespace o_minimal
variables {R : Type} (S : struc R)
class psh' (X : Type v) :=
(definable : Π {K : Def S}, (K → X) → Sort v)
-- restriction
-- coherence
instance (X : Type) [definable_psh S X] : psh' S X :=
{ definable := λ K f, definable_psh.definable f }
instance Type.psh' : psh' S Type :=
{ definable := λ K X, Π {L : Def S} (z : Hom L K), (Π l, X (z l)) → Prop }
-- plus coherence
instance function.psh' (X : Type) (Y : Type 1) [psh' S X] [psh' S Y] : psh' S (X → Y) :=
{ definable := λ K Φ, Π {L : Def.{0} S} (z : Hom L K) (f : L → X),
psh'.definable f → psh'.definable (λ l, Φ (z l) (f l)) }
-- plus coherence
instance Pi.psh' (X : Type) [psh' S X] (Y : X → Type) : psh' S (Π (x : X), Y x) :=
sorry
end o_minimal
|
b9eac421b55bebb2b89778675b6c0efa4d51813f | 6b10c15e653d49d146378acda9f3692e9b5b1950 | /examples/basic_skills/unnamed_813.lean | fe9c1e2571f831aa54ae4136a1da298ae4aaaf2f | [] | no_license | gebner/mathematics_in_lean | 3cf7f18767208ea6c3307ec3a67c7ac266d8514d | 6d1462bba46d66a9b948fc1aef2714fd265cde0b | refs/heads/master | 1,655,301,945,565 | 1,588,697,505,000 | 1,588,697,505,000 | 261,523,603 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,588,695,611,000 | 1,588,695,610,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 183 | lean | namespace my_ring
variables {R : Type*} [ring R]
-- BEGIN
lemma one_add_one_eq_two : 1 + 1 = (2 : R) :=
by refl
theorem two_mul (a : R) : 2 * a = a + a :=
sorry
-- END
end my_ring |
7bdec28216d032c6bd0dc47855fe55cc95a5cf2d | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebraic_geometry/prime_spectrum.lean | d1e458e19e3e4ac7896ffc16932d8e8acfa253f8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,167 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import topology.opens
import ring_theory.ideal.prod
import linear_algebra.finsupp
import algebra.punit_instances
/-!
# Prime spectrum of a commutative ring
The prime spectrum of a commutative ring is the type of all prime ideals.
It is naturally endowed with a topology: the Zariski topology.
(It is also naturally endowed with a sheaf of rings,
which is constructed in `algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf`.)
## Main definitions
* `prime_spectrum R`: The prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R`,
i.e., the set of all prime ideals of `R`.
* `zero_locus s`: The zero locus of a subset `s` of `R`
is the subset of `prime_spectrum R` consisting of all prime ideals that contain `s`.
* `vanishing_ideal t`: The vanishing ideal of a subset `t` of `prime_spectrum R`
is the intersection of points in `t` (viewed as prime ideals).
## Conventions
We denote subsets of rings with `s`, `s'`, etc...
whereas we denote subsets of prime spectra with `t`, `t'`, etc...
## Inspiration/contributors
The contents of this file draw inspiration from
<https://github.com/ramonfmir/lean-scheme>
which has contributions from Ramon Fernandez Mir, Kevin Buzzard, Kenny Lau,
and Chris Hughes (on an earlier repository).
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
universe variables u v
variables (R : Type u) [comm_ring R]
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R`
is the type of all prime ideals of `R`.
It is naturally endowed with a topology (the Zariski topology),
and a sheaf of commutative rings (see `algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf`).
It is a fundamental building block in algebraic geometry. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def prime_spectrum := {I : ideal R // I.is_prime}
variable {R}
namespace prime_spectrum
/-- A method to view a point in the prime spectrum of a commutative ring
as an ideal of that ring. -/
abbreviation as_ideal (x : prime_spectrum R) : ideal R := x.val
instance is_prime (x : prime_spectrum R) :
x.as_ideal.is_prime := x.2
/--
The prime spectrum of the zero ring is empty.
-/
lemma punit (x : prime_spectrum punit) : false :=
x.1.ne_top_iff_one.1 x.2.1 $ subsingleton.elim (0 : punit) 1 ▸ x.1.zero_mem
section
variables (R) (S : Type v) [comm_ring S]
/-- The prime spectrum of `R × S` is in bijection with the disjoint unions of the prime spectrum of
`R` and the prime spectrum of `S`. -/
noncomputable def prime_spectrum_prod :
prime_spectrum (R × S) ≃ prime_spectrum R ⊕ prime_spectrum S :=
ideal.prime_ideals_equiv R S
variables {R S}
@[simp] lemma prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inl_as_ideal (x : prime_spectrum R) :
((prime_spectrum_prod R S).symm (sum.inl x)).as_ideal = ideal.prod x.as_ideal ⊤ :=
by { cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inr_as_ideal (x : prime_spectrum S) :
((prime_spectrum_prod R S).symm (sum.inr x)).as_ideal = ideal.prod ⊤ x.as_ideal :=
by { cases x, refl }
end
@[ext] lemma ext {x y : prime_spectrum R} :
x = y ↔ x.as_ideal = y.as_ideal :=
subtype.ext_iff_val
/-- The zero locus of a set `s` of elements of a commutative ring `R`
is the set of all prime ideals of the ring that contain the set `s`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function
on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal)
the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring `R` modulo the prime ideal `x`.
In this manner, `zero_locus s` is exactly the subset of `prime_spectrum R`
where all "functions" in `s` vanish simultaneously.
-/
def zero_locus (s : set R) : set (prime_spectrum R) :=
{x | s ⊆ x.as_ideal}
@[simp] lemma mem_zero_locus (x : prime_spectrum R) (s : set R) :
x ∈ zero_locus s ↔ s ⊆ x.as_ideal := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_span (s : set R) :
zero_locus (ideal.span s : set R) = zero_locus s :=
by { ext x, exact (submodule.gi R R).gc s x.as_ideal }
/-- The vanishing ideal of a set `t` of points
of the prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R`
is the intersection of all the prime ideals in the set `t`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function
on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal)
the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring `R` modulo the prime ideal `x`.
In this manner, `vanishing_ideal t` is exactly the ideal of `R`
consisting of all "functions" that vanish on all of `t`.
-/
def vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) : ideal R :=
⨅ (x : prime_spectrum R) (h : x ∈ t), x.as_ideal
lemma coe_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
(vanishing_ideal t : set R) = {f : R | ∀ x : prime_spectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.as_ideal} :=
begin
ext f,
rw [vanishing_ideal, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_infi],
apply forall_congr, intro x,
rw [submodule.mem_infi],
end
lemma mem_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) (f : R) :
f ∈ vanishing_ideal t ↔ ∀ x : prime_spectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.as_ideal :=
by rw [← set_like.mem_coe, coe_vanishing_ideal, set.mem_set_of_eq]
@[simp] lemma vanishing_ideal_singleton (x : prime_spectrum R) :
vanishing_ideal ({x} : set (prime_spectrum R)) = x.as_ideal :=
by simp [vanishing_ideal]
lemma subset_zero_locus_iff_le_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) (I : ideal R) :
t ⊆ zero_locus I ↔ I ≤ vanishing_ideal t :=
⟨λ h f k, (mem_vanishing_ideal _ _).mpr (λ x j, (mem_zero_locus _ _).mpr (h j) k), λ h,
λ x j, (mem_zero_locus _ _).mpr (le_trans h (λ f h, ((mem_vanishing_ideal _ _).mp h) x j))⟩
section gc
variable (R)
/-- `zero_locus` and `vanishing_ideal` form a galois connection. -/
lemma gc : @galois_connection
(ideal R) (order_dual (set (prime_spectrum R))) _ _
(λ I, zero_locus I) (λ t, vanishing_ideal t) :=
λ I t, subset_zero_locus_iff_le_vanishing_ideal t I
/-- `zero_locus` and `vanishing_ideal` form a galois connection. -/
lemma gc_set : @galois_connection
(set R) (order_dual (set (prime_spectrum R))) _ _
(λ s, zero_locus s) (λ t, vanishing_ideal t) :=
have ideal_gc : galois_connection (ideal.span) coe := (submodule.gi R R).gc,
by simpa [zero_locus_span, function.comp] using galois_connection.compose _ _ _ _ ideal_gc (gc R)
lemma subset_zero_locus_iff_subset_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) (s : set R) :
t ⊆ zero_locus s ↔ s ⊆ vanishing_ideal t :=
(gc_set R) s t
end gc
lemma subset_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus (s : set R) :
s ⊆ vanishing_ideal (zero_locus s) :=
(gc_set R).le_u_l s
lemma le_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus (I : ideal R) :
I ≤ vanishing_ideal (zero_locus I) :=
(gc R).le_u_l I
@[simp] lemma vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical (I : ideal R) :
vanishing_ideal (zero_locus (I : set R)) = I.radical := ideal.ext $ λ f,
begin
rw [mem_vanishing_ideal, ideal.radical_eq_Inf, submodule.mem_Inf],
exact ⟨(λ h x hx, h ⟨x, hx.2⟩ hx.1), (λ h x hx, h x.1 ⟨hx, x.2⟩)⟩
end
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_radical (I : ideal R) : zero_locus (I.radical : set R) = zero_locus I :=
vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical I ▸ congr_fun (gc R).l_u_l_eq_l I
lemma subset_zero_locus_vanishing_ideal (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
t ⊆ zero_locus (vanishing_ideal t) :=
(gc R).l_u_le t
lemma zero_locus_anti_mono {s t : set R} (h : s ⊆ t) : zero_locus t ⊆ zero_locus s :=
(gc_set R).monotone_l h
lemma zero_locus_anti_mono_ideal {s t : ideal R} (h : s ≤ t) :
zero_locus (t : set R) ⊆ zero_locus (s : set R) :=
(gc R).monotone_l h
lemma vanishing_ideal_anti_mono {s t : set (prime_spectrum R)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
vanishing_ideal t ≤ vanishing_ideal s :=
(gc R).monotone_u h
lemma zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_iff (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus (I : set R) ⊆ zero_locus (J : set R) ↔ J ≤ I.radical :=
⟨λ h, ideal.radical_le_radical_iff.mp (vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical I ▸
vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical J ▸ vanishing_ideal_anti_mono h),
λ h, zero_locus_radical I ▸ zero_locus_anti_mono_ideal h⟩
lemma zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_singleton_iff (f g : R) :
zero_locus ({f} : set R) ⊆ zero_locus {g} ↔ g ∈ (ideal.span ({f} : set R)).radical :=
by rw [← zero_locus_span {f}, ← zero_locus_span {g}, zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_iff,
ideal.span_le, set.singleton_subset_iff, set_like.mem_coe]
lemma zero_locus_bot :
zero_locus ((⊥ : ideal R) : set R) = set.univ :=
(gc R).l_bot
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_singleton_zero :
zero_locus ({0} : set R) = set.univ :=
zero_locus_bot
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_empty :
zero_locus (∅ : set R) = set.univ :=
(gc_set R).l_bot
@[simp] lemma vanishing_ideal_univ :
vanishing_ideal (∅ : set (prime_spectrum R)) = ⊤ :=
by simpa using (gc R).u_top
lemma zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem {s : set R} (h : (1:R) ∈ s) :
zero_locus s = ∅ :=
begin
rw set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
intros x hx,
rw mem_zero_locus at hx,
have x_prime : x.as_ideal.is_prime := by apply_instance,
have eq_top : x.as_ideal = ⊤, { rw ideal.eq_top_iff_one, exact hx h },
apply x_prime.ne_top eq_top,
end
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_singleton_one :
zero_locus ({1} : set R) = ∅ :=
zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem (set.mem_singleton (1 : R))
lemma zero_locus_empty_iff_eq_top {I : ideal R} :
zero_locus (I : set R) = ∅ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
begin
split,
{ contrapose!,
intro h,
apply set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty.mpr,
rcases ideal.exists_le_maximal I h with ⟨M, hM, hIM⟩,
exact ⟨⟨M, hM.is_prime⟩, hIM⟩ },
{ rintro rfl, apply zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem, trivial }
end
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_univ :
zero_locus (set.univ : set R) = ∅ :=
zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem (set.mem_univ 1)
lemma zero_locus_sup (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus ((I ⊔ J : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I ∩ zero_locus J :=
(gc R).l_sup
lemma zero_locus_union (s s' : set R) :
zero_locus (s ∪ s') = zero_locus s ∩ zero_locus s' :=
(gc_set R).l_sup
lemma vanishing_ideal_union (t t' : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal (t ∪ t') = vanishing_ideal t ⊓ vanishing_ideal t' :=
(gc R).u_inf
lemma zero_locus_supr {ι : Sort*} (I : ι → ideal R) :
zero_locus ((⨆ i, I i : ideal R) : set R) = (⋂ i, zero_locus (I i)) :=
(gc R).l_supr
lemma zero_locus_Union {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → set R) :
zero_locus (⋃ i, s i) = (⋂ i, zero_locus (s i)) :=
(gc_set R).l_supr
lemma zero_locus_bUnion (s : set (set R)) :
zero_locus (⋃ s' ∈ s, s' : set R) = ⋂ s' ∈ s, zero_locus s' :=
by simp only [zero_locus_Union]
lemma vanishing_ideal_Union {ι : Sort*} (t : ι → set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal (⋃ i, t i) = (⨅ i, vanishing_ideal (t i)) :=
(gc R).u_infi
lemma zero_locus_inf (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus ((I ⊓ J : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I ∪ zero_locus J :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.inf_le
lemma union_zero_locus (s s' : set R) :
zero_locus s ∪ zero_locus s' = zero_locus ((ideal.span s) ⊓ (ideal.span s') : ideal R) :=
by { rw zero_locus_inf, simp }
lemma zero_locus_mul (I J : ideal R) :
zero_locus ((I * J : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I ∪ zero_locus J :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.mul_le
lemma zero_locus_singleton_mul (f g : R) :
zero_locus ({f * g} : set R) = zero_locus {f} ∪ zero_locus {g} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_pow (I : ideal R) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
zero_locus ((I ^ n : ideal R) : set R) = zero_locus I :=
zero_locus_radical (I ^ n) ▸ (I.radical_pow n hn).symm ▸ zero_locus_radical I
@[simp] lemma zero_locus_singleton_pow (f : R) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
zero_locus ({f ^ n} : set R) = zero_locus {f} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa using x.2.pow_mem_iff_mem n hn
lemma sup_vanishing_ideal_le (t t' : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal t ⊔ vanishing_ideal t' ≤ vanishing_ideal (t ∩ t') :=
begin
intros r,
rw [submodule.mem_sup, mem_vanishing_ideal],
rintro ⟨f, hf, g, hg, rfl⟩ x ⟨hxt, hxt'⟩,
rw mem_vanishing_ideal at hf hg,
apply submodule.add_mem; solve_by_elim
end
lemma mem_compl_zero_locus_iff_not_mem {f : R} {I : prime_spectrum R} :
I ∈ (zero_locus {f} : set (prime_spectrum R))ᶜ ↔ f ∉ I.as_ideal :=
by rw [set.mem_compl_eq, mem_zero_locus, set.singleton_subset_iff]; refl
/-- The Zariski topology on the prime spectrum of a commutative ring
is defined via the closed sets of the topology:
they are exactly those sets that are the zero locus of a subset of the ring. -/
instance zariski_topology : topological_space (prime_spectrum R) :=
topological_space.of_closed (set.range prime_spectrum.zero_locus)
(⟨set.univ, by simp⟩)
begin
intros Zs h,
rw set.sInter_eq_Inter,
let f : Zs → set R := λ i, classical.some (h i.2),
have hf : ∀ i : Zs, ↑i = zero_locus (f i) := λ i, (classical.some_spec (h i.2)).symm,
simp only [hf],
exact ⟨_, zero_locus_Union _⟩
end
(by { rintro _ _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ ⟨t, rfl⟩, exact ⟨_, (union_zero_locus s t).symm⟩ })
lemma is_open_iff (U : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
is_open U ↔ ∃ s, Uᶜ = zero_locus s :=
by simp only [@eq_comm _ Uᶜ]; refl
lemma is_closed_iff_zero_locus (Z : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
is_closed Z ↔ ∃ s, Z = zero_locus s :=
by rw [← is_open_compl_iff, is_open_iff, compl_compl]
lemma is_closed_zero_locus (s : set R) :
is_closed (zero_locus s) :=
by { rw [is_closed_iff_zero_locus], exact ⟨s, rfl⟩ }
lemma zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
zero_locus (vanishing_ideal t : set R) = closure t :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ rintro x hx t' ⟨ht', ht⟩,
obtain ⟨fs, rfl⟩ : ∃ s, t' = zero_locus s,
by rwa [is_closed_iff_zero_locus] at ht',
rw [subset_zero_locus_iff_subset_vanishing_ideal] at ht,
exact set.subset.trans ht hx },
{ rw (is_closed_zero_locus _).closure_subset_iff,
exact subset_zero_locus_vanishing_ideal t }
end
lemma vanishing_ideal_closure (t : set (prime_spectrum R)) :
vanishing_ideal (closure t) = vanishing_ideal t :=
zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure t ▸ congr_fun (gc R).u_l_u_eq_u t
section comap
variables {S : Type v} [comm_ring S] {S' : Type*} [comm_ring S']
/-- The function between prime spectra of commutative rings induced by a ring homomorphism.
This function is continuous. -/
def comap (f : R →+* S) : prime_spectrum S → prime_spectrum R :=
λ y, ⟨ideal.comap f y.as_ideal, infer_instance⟩
variables (f : R →+* S)
@[simp] lemma comap_as_ideal (y : prime_spectrum S) :
(comap f y).as_ideal = ideal.comap f y.as_ideal :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_id : comap (ring_hom.id R) = id :=
funext $ λ _, subtype.ext $ ideal.ext $ λ _, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_comp (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* S') :
comap (g.comp f) = comap f ∘ comap g :=
funext $ λ _, subtype.ext $ ideal.ext $ λ _, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_comap_zero_locus (s : set R) :
(comap f) ⁻¹' (zero_locus s) = zero_locus (f '' s) :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_zero_locus, set.mem_preimage, comap_as_ideal, set.image_subset_iff],
refl
end
lemma comap_continuous (f : R →+* S) : continuous (comap f) :=
begin
rw continuous_iff_is_closed,
simp only [is_closed_iff_zero_locus],
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, preimage_comap_zero_locus f s⟩
end
end comap
section basic_open
/-- `basic_open r` is the open subset containing all prime ideals not containing `r`. -/
def basic_open (r : R) : topological_space.opens (prime_spectrum R) :=
{ val := { x | r ∉ x.as_ideal },
property := ⟨{r}, set.ext $ λ x, set.singleton_subset_iff.trans $ not_not.symm⟩ }
@[simp] lemma mem_basic_open (f : R) (x : prime_spectrum R) :
x ∈ basic_open f ↔ f ∉ x.as_ideal := iff.rfl
lemma is_open_basic_open {a : R} : is_open ((basic_open a) : set (prime_spectrum R)) :=
(basic_open a).property
@[simp] lemma basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl (r : R) :
(basic_open r : set (prime_spectrum R)) = (zero_locus {r})ᶜ :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simpa only [set.mem_compl_eq, mem_zero_locus, set.singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma basic_open_one : basic_open (1 : R) = ⊤ :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by {simp, refl}
@[simp] lemma basic_open_zero : basic_open (0 : R) = ⊥ :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by {simp, refl}
lemma basic_open_le_basic_open_iff (f g : R) :
basic_open f ≤ basic_open g ↔ f ∈ (ideal.span ({g} : set R)).radical :=
by rw [topological_space.opens.le_def, basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl,
basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl, set.le_eq_subset, set.compl_subset_compl,
zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_singleton_iff]
lemma basic_open_mul (f g : R) : basic_open (f * g) = basic_open f ⊓ basic_open g :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by {simp [zero_locus_singleton_mul]}
lemma basic_open_mul_le_left (f g : R) : basic_open (f * g) ≤ basic_open f :=
by { rw basic_open_mul f g, exact inf_le_left }
lemma basic_open_mul_le_right (f g : R) : basic_open (f * g) ≤ basic_open g :=
by { rw basic_open_mul f g, exact inf_le_right }
@[simp] lemma basic_open_pow (f : R) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : basic_open (f ^ n) = basic_open f :=
topological_space.opens.ext $ by simpa using zero_locus_singleton_pow f n hn
lemma is_topological_basis_basic_opens : topological_space.is_topological_basis
(set.range (λ (r : R), (basic_open r : set (prime_spectrum R)))) :=
begin
apply topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds,
{ rintros _ ⟨r, rfl⟩,
exact is_open_basic_open },
{ rintros p U hp ⟨s, hs⟩,
rw [← compl_compl U, set.mem_compl_eq, ← hs, mem_zero_locus, set.not_subset] at hp,
obtain ⟨f, hfs, hfp⟩ := hp,
refine ⟨basic_open f, ⟨f, rfl⟩, hfp, _⟩,
rw [← set.compl_subset_compl, ← hs, basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl, compl_compl],
exact zero_locus_anti_mono (set.singleton_subset_iff.mpr hfs) }
end
lemma is_compact_basic_open (f : R) : is_compact (basic_open f : set (prime_spectrum R)) :=
is_compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed $ λ ι Z hZc hZ,
begin
let I : ι → ideal R := λ i, vanishing_ideal (Z i),
have hI : ∀ i, Z i = zero_locus (I i) := λ i,
by simpa only [zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure] using (hZc i).closure_eq.symm,
rw [basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl f, set.inter_comm, ← set.diff_eq,
set.diff_eq_empty, funext hI, ← zero_locus_supr] at hZ,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : f ∈ (⨆ (i : ι), I i).radical,
{ rw ← vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical,
apply vanishing_ideal_anti_mono hZ,
exact (subset_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus {f} (set.mem_singleton f)) },
rcases submodule.exists_finset_of_mem_supr I hn with ⟨s, hs⟩,
use s,
-- Using simp_rw here, because `hI` and `zero_locus_supr` need to be applied underneath binders
simp_rw [basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl f, set.inter_comm, ← set.diff_eq,
set.diff_eq_empty, hI, ← zero_locus_supr],
rw ← zero_locus_radical, -- this one can't be in `simp_rw` because it would loop
apply zero_locus_anti_mono,
rw set.singleton_subset_iff,
exact ⟨n, hs⟩
end
end basic_open
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative ring is a compact topological space. -/
instance : compact_space (prime_spectrum R) :=
{ compact_univ := by { convert is_compact_basic_open (1 : R), rw basic_open_one, refl } }
section order
/-!
## The specialization order
We endow `prime_spectrum R` with a partial order,
where `x ≤ y` if and only if `y ∈ closure {x}`.
TODO: maybe define sober topological spaces, and generalise this instance to those
-/
instance : partial_order (prime_spectrum R) :=
subtype.partial_order _
@[simp] lemma as_ideal_le_as_ideal (x y : prime_spectrum R) :
x.as_ideal ≤ y.as_ideal ↔ x ≤ y :=
subtype.coe_le_coe
@[simp] lemma as_ideal_lt_as_ideal (x y : prime_spectrum R) :
x.as_ideal < y.as_ideal ↔ x < y :=
subtype.coe_lt_coe
lemma le_iff_mem_closure (x y : prime_spectrum R) :
x ≤ y ↔ y ∈ closure ({x} : set (prime_spectrum R)) :=
by rw [← as_ideal_le_as_ideal, ← zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure,
mem_zero_locus, vanishing_ideal_singleton, set_like.coe_subset_coe]
end order
end prime_spectrum
|
b75e1e9ccb7a459762d1d50be74cc6fb24644eb3 | 4efff1f47634ff19e2f786deadd394270a59ecd2 | /src/order/directed.lean | 0ad66c03c30ebbd7b95f93d58f15fd73b3f652db | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | agjftucker/mathlib | d634cd0d5256b6325e3c55bb7fb2403548371707 | 87fe50de17b00af533f72a102d0adefe4a2285e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,378,131,941 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 160,748,509 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,141,789,000 | 1,544,141,789,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,083 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import order.lattice
import data.set.basic
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} (r : α → α → Prop)
local infix ` ≼ ` : 50 := r
/-- A family of elements of α is directed (with respect to a relation `≼` on α)
if there is a member of the family `≼`-above any pair in the family. -/
def directed (f : ι → α) := ∀x y, ∃z, f x ≼ f z ∧ f y ≼ f z
/-- A subset of α is directed if there is an element of the set `≼`-above any
pair of elements in the set. -/
def directed_on (s : set α) := ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∃z ∈ s, x ≼ z ∧ y ≼ z
variables {r}
theorem directed_on_iff_directed {s} : @directed_on α r s ↔ directed r (coe : s → α) :=
by simp [directed, directed_on]; refine ball_congr (λ x hx, by simp; refl)
alias directed_on_iff_directed ↔ directed_on.directed_coe _
theorem directed_on_image {s} {f : β → α} :
directed_on r (f '' s) ↔ directed_on (f ⁻¹'o r) s :=
by simp only [directed_on, set.ball_image_iff, set.bex_image_iff, order.preimage]
theorem directed_on.mono {s : set α} (h : directed_on r s)
{r' : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ {a b}, r a b → r' a b) :
directed_on r' s :=
λ x hx y hy, let ⟨z, zs, xz, yz⟩ := h x hx y hy in ⟨z, zs, H xz, H yz⟩
theorem directed_comp {ι} {f : ι → β} {g : β → α} :
directed r (g ∘ f) ↔ directed (g ⁻¹'o r) f := iff.rfl
theorem directed.mono {s : α → α → Prop} {ι} {f : ι → α}
(H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) (h : directed r f) : directed s f :=
λ a b, let ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := h a b in ⟨c, H _ _ h₁, H _ _ h₂⟩
theorem directed.mono_comp {ι} {rb : β → β → Prop} {g : α → β} {f : ι → α}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≼ y → rb (g x) (g y)) (hf : directed r f) :
directed rb (g ∘ f) :=
directed_comp.2 $ hf.mono hg
/-- A monotone function on a sup-semilattice is directed. -/
lemma directed_of_sup [semilattice_sup α] {f : α → β} {r : β → β → Prop}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ≤ j → r (f i) (f j)) : directed r f :=
λ a b, ⟨a ⊔ b, H le_sup_left, H le_sup_right⟩
/-- An antimonotone function on an inf-semilattice is directed. -/
lemma directed_of_inf [semilattice_inf α] {r : β → β → Prop} {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀a₁ a₂, a₁ ≤ a₂ → r (f a₂) (f a₁)) : directed r f :=
assume x y, ⟨x ⊓ y, hf _ _ inf_le_left, hf _ _ inf_le_right⟩
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A `preorder` is a `directed_order` if for any two elements `i`, `j`
there is an element `k` such that `i ≤ k` and `j ≤ k`. -/
class directed_order (α : Type u) extends preorder α :=
(directed : ∀ i j : α, ∃ k, i ≤ k ∧ j ≤ k)
instance linear_order.to_directed_order (α) [linear_order α] : directed_order α :=
⟨λ i j, or.cases_on (le_total i j) (λ hij, ⟨j, hij, le_refl j⟩) (λ hji, ⟨i, le_refl i, hji⟩)⟩
end prio
|
1d6446bb5b2ac4800470ccf2498d0a280c56adcf | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Rewrite.lean | 87ffadfd08761e0602ef2aefc67f43a0840bf080 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,560 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.AppBuilder
import Lean.Meta.KAbstract
import Lean.Meta.Check
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Apply
namespace Lean
namespace Meta
structure RewriteResult :=
(eNew : Expr)
(eqProof : Expr)
(mvarIds : List MVarId) -- new goals
def rewrite (mvarId : MVarId) (e : Expr) (heq : Expr) (symm : Bool := false) (occs : Occurrences := Occurrences.all) : MetaM RewriteResult :=
withMVarContext mvarId $ do
checkNotAssigned mvarId `rewrite;
heqType ← inferType heq;
(newMVars, binderInfos, heqType) ← forallMetaTelescopeReducing heqType;
let heq := mkAppN heq newMVars;
let continue (heq heqType : Expr) : MetaM RewriteResult :=
match heqType.eq? with
| none => throwTacticEx `rewrite mvarId ("equality of iff proof expected")
| some (α, lhs, rhs) =>
let continue (heq heqType lhs rhs : Expr) : MetaM RewriteResult := do {
when lhs.getAppFn.isMVar $
throwTacticEx `rewrite mvarId ("pattern is a metavariable " ++ indentExpr lhs ++ Format.line ++ "from equation" ++ indentExpr heqType);
e ← instantiateMVars e;
eAbst ← kabstract e lhs occs;
unless eAbst.hasLooseBVars $
throwTacticEx `rewrite mvarId ("did not find instance of the pattern in the target expression");
-- construct rewrite proof
let eNew := eAbst.instantiate1 rhs;
eNew ← instantiateMVars eNew;
eEqE ← mkEq e e;
let eEqEAbst := mkApp eEqE.appFn! eAbst;
let motive := Lean.mkLambda `_a BinderInfo.default α eEqEAbst;
unlessM (isTypeCorrect motive) $
throwTacticEx `rewrite mvarId ("motive is not type correct");
eqRefl ← mkEqRefl e;
eqPrf ← mkEqNDRec motive eqRefl heq;
postprocessAppMVars `rewrite mvarId newMVars binderInfos;
newMVars ← newMVars.filterM $ fun mvar => not <$> isExprMVarAssigned mvar.mvarId!;
pure { eNew := eNew, eqProof := eqPrf, mvarIds := newMVars.toList.map Expr.mvarId! }
};
match symm with
| false => continue heq heqType lhs rhs
| true => do {
heq ← mkEqSymm heq;
heqType ← mkEq rhs lhs;
continue heq heqType rhs lhs
};
match heqType.iff? with
| some (lhs, rhs) => do
heqType ← mkEq lhs rhs;
let heq := mkApp3 (mkConst `propext) lhs rhs heq;
continue heq heqType
| none =>
continue heq heqType
end Meta
end Lean
|
6e6a8cd05e0b65e618c1bc7a917fb30ae8b5e516 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/topology/continuous_on.lean | 0a3c6b24c34ef70bb5f3cb70710aca7571695a2c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,277 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file defines relative versions
`nhds_within` of `nhds`
`continuous_on` of `continuous`
`continuous_within_at` of `continuous_at`
and proves their basic properties, including the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
-/
open set filter
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
variables [topological_space α]
/-- The "neighborhood within" filter. Elements of `nhds_within a s` are sets containing the
intersection of `s` and a neighborhood of `a`. -/
def nhds_within (a : α) (s : set α) : filter α := 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s
theorem nhds_within_eq (a : α) (s : set α) :
nhds_within a s = ⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (t ∩ s) :=
have set.univ ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, from ⟨set.mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩,
begin
rw [nhds_within, nhds, binfi_inf]; try { exact this },
simp only [inf_principal]
end
theorem nhds_within_univ (a : α) : nhds_within a set.univ = 𝓝 a :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
lemma nhds_within_has_basis {p : β → Prop} {s : β → set α} {a : α} (h : (𝓝 a).has_basis p s)
(t : set α) :
(nhds_within a t).has_basis p (λ i, s i ∩ t) :=
h.inf_principal t
lemma nhds_within_basis_open (a : α) (t : set α) :
(nhds_within a t).has_basis (λ u, a ∈ u ∧ is_open u) (λ u, u ∩ t) :=
nhds_within_has_basis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhds_within {t : set α} {a : α} {s : set α} :
t ∈ nhds_within a s ↔ ∃ u, is_open u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
by simpa only [exists_prop, and_assoc, and_comm] using nhds_within_basis_open a s t
lemma mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : set α} {a : α} {s : set α} :
t ∈ nhds_within a s ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
nhds_within_has_basis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s t
lemma mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds {s t : set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
s ∈ nhds_within a t :=
mem_inf_sets_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhds_within {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ nhds_within a s :=
mem_inf_sets_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem inter_mem_nhds_within (s : set α) {t : set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) :
s ∩ t ∈ nhds_within a s :=
inter_mem_sets (mem_inf_sets_of_right (mem_principal_self s)) (mem_inf_sets_of_left h)
theorem nhds_within_mono (a : α) {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : nhds_within a s ≤ nhds_within a t :=
inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr h)
lemma mem_of_mem_nhds_within {a : α} {s t : set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ nhds_within a s) :
a ∈ t :=
let ⟨u, hu, H⟩ := mem_nhds_within.1 ht in H.2 ⟨H.1, ha⟩
lemma filter.eventually.self_of_nhds_within {p : α → Prop} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhds_within hx h
theorem nhds_within_restrict'' {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h : t ∈ nhds_within a s) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem_sets self_mem_nhds_within h)))
(inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr (set.inter_subset_left _ _)))
theorem nhds_within_restrict' {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
nhds_within_restrict'' s $ mem_inf_sets_of_left h
theorem nhds_within_restrict {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : is_open t) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
nhds_within_restrict' s (mem_nhds_sets h₁ h₀)
theorem nhds_within_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : set α} (h : s ∈ nhds_within a t) :
nhds_within a t ≤ nhds_within a s :=
begin
rcases mem_nhds_within.1 h with ⟨u, u_open, au, uts⟩,
have : nhds_within a t = nhds_within a (t ∩ u) := nhds_within_restrict _ au u_open,
rw [this, inter_comm],
exact nhds_within_mono _ uts
end
theorem nhds_within_eq_nhds_within {a : α} {s t u : set α}
(h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
nhds_within a t = nhds_within a u :=
by rw [nhds_within_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhds_within_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
theorem nhds_within_eq_of_open {a : α} {s : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) :
nhds_within a s = 𝓝 a :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ]; apply nhds_within_eq_nhds_within h₀ h₁;
rw [set.univ_inter, set.inter_self]
@[simp] theorem nhds_within_empty (a : α) : nhds_within a {} = ⊥ :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhds_within_union (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∪ t) = nhds_within a s ⊔ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [←inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_within_inter (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = nhds_within a s ⊓ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal,
←inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhds_within_inter' (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = (nhds_within a s) ⊓ principal t :=
by { unfold nhds_within, rw [←inf_principal, inf_assoc] }
lemma nhds_within_prod_eq {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {β : Type*} [topological_space β]
(a : α) (b : β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
nhds_within (a, b) (s.prod t) = (nhds_within a s).prod (nhds_within b t) :=
by { unfold nhds_within, rw [nhds_prod_eq, ←filter.prod_inf_prod, filter.prod_principal_principal] }
theorem tendsto_if_nhds_within {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter β}
(h₀ : tendsto f (nhds_within a (s ∩ p)) l)
(h₁ : tendsto g (nhds_within a (s ∩ {x | ¬ p x})) l) :
tendsto (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) (nhds_within a s) l :=
by apply tendsto_if; rw [←nhds_within_inter']; assumption
lemma map_nhds_within (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : set α) :
map f (nhds_within a s) =
⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (set.image f (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhds_within_basis_open a s).map f).eq_binfi
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s t : set α} {l : filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f (nhds_within a t) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : filter β}
{a : α} {s t : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f l (nhds_within a s)) :
tendsto f l (nhds_within a t) :=
tendsto_le_right (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s : set α} {l : filter β} (h : tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ] at h; exact tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left (set.subset_univ _) h
theorem principal_subtype {α : Type*} (s : set α) (t : set {x // x ∈ s}) :
principal t = comap subtype.val (principal (subtype.val '' t)) :=
by rw comap_principal; rw set.preimage_image_eq; apply subtype.val_injective
lemma mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ nhds_within x s ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds.trans (nhds_within_has_basis (𝓝 x).basis_sets s).forall_nonempty_iff_ne_bot
lemma nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem {s : set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
nhds_within x s ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 $ subset_closure hx
lemma is_closed.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s)
{x : α} (hx : nhds_within x s ≠ ⊥) : x ∈ s :=
by simpa only [closure_eq_of_is_closed hs] using mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.2 hx
/-
nhds_within and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhds_within_subtype (s : set α) (a : {x // x ∈ s}) (t u : set {x // x ∈ s}) :
t ∈ nhds_within a u ↔
t ∈ comap (@subtype.val _ s) (nhds_within a.val (subtype.val '' u)) :=
by rw [nhds_within, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ←comap_inf, ←nhds_within]
theorem nhds_within_subtype (s : set α) (a : {x // x ∈ s}) (t : set {x // x ∈ s}) :
nhds_within a t = comap (@subtype.val _ s) (nhds_within a.val (subtype.val '' t)) :=
filter_eq $ by ext u; rw mem_nhds_within_subtype
theorem nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_val {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
nhds_within a s = map subtype.val (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
have h₀ : s ∈ nhds_within a s,
by { rw [mem_nhds_within], existsi set.univ, simp [set.diff_eq] },
have h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ x, @subtype.val _ s x = y,
from λ y h, ⟨⟨y, h⟩, rfl⟩,
begin
rw [←nhds_within_univ, nhds_within_subtype, subtype.val_image_univ],
exact (map_comap_of_surjective' h₀ h₁).symm,
end
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : filter β) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l ↔ tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l :=
by { simp only [tendsto, nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_val h, filter.map_map], refl }
variables [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous at a point `x₀` within a subset `s`
if `f x` tends to `f x₀` when `x` tends to `x₀` while staying within `s`. -/
def continuous_within_at (f : α → β) (s : set α) (x : α) : Prop :=
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 (f x))
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `tendsto.comp` as
`continuous_within_at.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
lemma continuous_within_at.tendsto {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous_within_at f s x) :
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 (f x)) := h
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous on a subset `s`
when it's continuous at every point of `s` within `s`. -/
def continuous_on (f : α → β) (s : set α) : Prop := ∀ x ∈ s, continuous_within_at f s x
lemma continuous_on.continuous_within_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} (hf : continuous_on f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuous_within_at_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
continuous_within_at f set.univ x ↔ continuous_at f x :=
by rw [continuous_at, continuous_within_at, nhds_within_univ]
theorem continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
continuous_within_at f s x ↔ continuous_at (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype h f _
theorem continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : set α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) :
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (nhds_within (f x) (f '' s)) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 $
mem_inf_sets_of_right $ mem_principal_sets.2 $
λ x, mem_image_of_mem _⟩
theorem continuous_on_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : set β, is_open t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, is_open u ∧ x ∈ u ∧
u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
by simp only [continuous_on, continuous_within_at, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhds_within]
theorem continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ continuous (s.restrict f) :=
begin
rw [continuous_on, continuous_iff_continuous_at], split,
{ rintros h ⟨x, xs⟩,
exact (continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs) },
intros h x xs,
exact (continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
end
theorem continuous_on_iff' {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ t : set β, is_open t → ∃ u, is_open u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
have ∀ t, is_open (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ (u : set α), is_open u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s,
begin
intro t,
rw [is_open_induced_iff, set.restrict_eq, set.preimage_comp],
simp only [preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff],
split; { rintros ⟨u, ou, useq⟩, exact ⟨u, ou, useq.symm⟩ }
end,
by rw [continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_on_iff_is_closed {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ t : set β, is_closed t → ∃ u, is_closed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
have ∀ t, is_closed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ (u : set α), is_closed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s,
begin
intro t,
rw [is_closed_induced_iff, set.restrict_eq, set.preimage_comp],
simp only [preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
end,
by rw [continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_is_closed]; simp only [this]
lemma continuous_on_empty (f : α → β) : continuous_on f ∅ :=
λ x, false.elim
theorem nhds_within_le_comap {x : α} {s : set α} {f : α → β} (ctsf : continuous_within_at f s x) :
nhds_within x s ≤ comap f (nhds_within (f x) (f '' s)) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 ctsf.tendsto_nhds_within_image
theorem continuous_within_at_iff_ptendsto_res (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : set α} :
continuous_within_at f s x ↔ ptendsto (pfun.res f s) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
tendsto_iff_ptendsto _ _ _ _
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ {f : α → β} : continuous f ↔ continuous_on f univ :=
by simp [continuous_iff_continuous_at, continuous_on, continuous_at, continuous_within_at,
nhds_within_univ]
lemma continuous_within_at.mono {f : α → β} {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous_within_at f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono x hs) h
lemma continuous_within_at_inter' {f : α → β} {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : t ∈ nhds_within x s) :
continuous_within_at f (s ∩ t) x ↔ continuous_within_at f s x :=
by simp [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_restrict'' s h]
lemma continuous_within_at_inter {f : α → β} {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
continuous_within_at f (s ∩ t) x ↔ continuous_within_at f s x :=
by simp [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_restrict' s h]
lemma continuous_within_at.union {f : α → β} {s t : set α} {x : α}
(hs : continuous_within_at f s x) (ht : continuous_within_at f t x) :
continuous_within_at f (s ∪ t) x :=
by simp only [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_union, tendsto, map_sup, sup_le_iff.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩]
lemma continuous_within_at.mem_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
mem_closure_of_tendsto (mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 hx) h $
mem_sets_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within (subset_preimage_image f s)
lemma continuous_within_at.mem_closure {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} {A : set β}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hA : s ⊆ f⁻¹' A) : f x ∈ closure A :=
closure_mono (image_subset_iff.2 hA) (h.mem_closure_image hx)
lemma continuous_within_at.image_closure {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ closure s, continuous_within_at f s x) :
f '' (closure s) ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
begin
rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact (hf x hx).mem_closure_image hx
end
theorem is_open_map.continuous_on_image_of_left_inv_on {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(h : is_open_map (s.restrict f)) {finv : β → α} (hleft : left_inv_on finv f s) :
continuous_on finv (f '' s) :=
begin
rintros _ ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩ t ht,
rw [hleft xs] at ht,
replace h := h.nhds_le ⟨x, xs⟩,
apply mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds,
apply h,
erw [map_compose.symm, function.comp, mem_map, ← nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_val],
apply mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_nhds_within _ ht),
assume y hy,
rw [mem_set_of_eq, mem_preimage, hleft hy.1],
exact hy.2
end
theorem is_open_map.continuous_on_range_of_left_inverse {f : α → β} (hf : is_open_map f)
{finv : β → α} (hleft : function.left_inverse finv f) :
continuous_on finv (range f) :=
begin
rw [← image_univ],
exact (hf.restrict is_open_univ).continuous_on_image_of_left_inv_on (λ x _, hleft x)
end
lemma continuous_on.congr_mono {f g : α → β} {s s₁ : set α} (h : continuous_on f s)
(h' : ∀x ∈ s₁, g x = f x) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) : continuous_on g s₁ :=
begin
assume x hx,
unfold continuous_within_at,
have A := (h x (h₁ hx)).mono h₁,
unfold continuous_within_at at A,
rw ← h' x hx at A,
have : {x : α | g x = f x} ∈ nhds_within x s₁ := mem_inf_sets_of_right h',
apply tendsto.congr' _ A,
convert this,
ext,
finish
end
lemma continuous_on.congr {f g : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous_on f s)
(h' : ∀x ∈ s, g x = f x) : continuous_on g s :=
h.congr_mono h' (subset.refl _)
lemma continuous_on_congr {f g : α → β} {s : set α} (h' : ∀x ∈ s, g x = f x) :
continuous_on g s ↔ continuous_on f s :=
⟨λ h, continuous_on.congr h (λx hx, (h' x hx).symm), λ h, continuous_on.congr h h'⟩
lemma continuous_at.continuous_within_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous_at f x) :
continuous_within_at f s x :=
continuous_within_at.mono ((continuous_within_at_univ f x).2 h) (subset_univ _)
lemma continuous_within_at.continuous_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : continuous_at f x :=
begin
have : s = univ ∩ s, by rw univ_inter,
rwa [this, continuous_within_at_inter hs, continuous_within_at_univ] at h
end
lemma continuous_on.continuous_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_on f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : continuous_at f x :=
(h x (mem_of_nhds hx)).continuous_at hx
lemma continuous_within_at.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β} {x : α}
(hg : continuous_within_at g t (f x)) (hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (h : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
continuous_within_at (g ∘ f) s x :=
begin
have : tendsto f (principal s) (principal t),
by { rw tendsto_principal_principal, exact λx hx, h hx },
have : tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (principal t) :=
tendsto_le_left inf_le_right this,
have : tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (nhds_within (f x) t) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hf, this⟩,
exact tendsto.comp hg this
end
lemma continuous_on.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hg : continuous_on g t) (hf : continuous_on f s) (h : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
continuous_on (g ∘ f) s :=
λx hx, continuous_within_at.comp (hg _ (h hx)) (hf x hx) h
lemma continuous_on.mono {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (hf : continuous_on f s) (h : t ⊆ s) :
continuous_on f t :=
λx hx, tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono _ h) (hf x (h hx))
lemma continuous.continuous_on {f : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous f) :
continuous_on f s :=
begin
rw continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ at h,
exact h.mono (subset_univ _)
end
lemma continuous.continuous_within_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous f) :
continuous_within_at f s x :=
tendsto_le_left inf_le_left (h.tendsto x)
lemma continuous.comp_continuous_on {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hg : continuous g) (hf : continuous_on f s) :
continuous_on (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.continuous_on.comp hf subset_preimage_univ
lemma continuous_within_at.preimage_mem_nhds_within {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ nhds_within x s :=
h ht
lemma continuous_within_at.preimage_mem_nhds_within' {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (ht : t ∈ nhds_within (f x) (f '' s)) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ nhds_within x s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨u, u_open, fxu, hu⟩,
have : f ⁻¹' u ∩ s ∈ nhds_within x s :=
filter.inter_mem_sets (h (mem_nhds_sets u_open fxu)) self_mem_nhds_within,
apply mem_sets_of_superset this,
calc f ⁻¹' u ∩ s
⊆ f ⁻¹' u ∩ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) : inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_preimage_image f s)
... = f ⁻¹' (u ∩ f '' s) : rfl
... ⊆ f ⁻¹' t : preimage_mono hu
end
lemma continuous_within_at.congr_of_mem_nhds_within {f f₁ : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (h₁ : {y | f₁ y = f y} ∈ nhds_within x s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
continuous_within_at f₁ s x :=
by rwa [continuous_within_at, filter.tendsto, hx, filter.map_cong h₁]
lemma continuous_within_at.congr {f f₁ : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (h₁ : ∀y∈s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
continuous_within_at f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_mem_nhds_within (mem_sets_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within h₁) hx
lemma continuous_on_const {s : set α} {c : β} : continuous_on (λx, c) s :=
continuous_const.continuous_on
lemma continuous_within_at_const {b : β} {s : set α} {x : α} :
continuous_within_at (λ _:α, b) s x :=
continuous_const.continuous_within_at
lemma continuous_on_id {s : set α} : continuous_on id s :=
continuous_id.continuous_on
lemma continuous_within_at_id {s : set α} {x : α} : continuous_within_at id s x :=
continuous_id.continuous_within_at
lemma continuous_on_open_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) :
continuous_on f s ↔ (∀t, is_open t → is_open (s ∩ f⁻¹' t)) :=
begin
rw continuous_on_iff',
split,
{ assume h t ht,
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩,
rw [inter_comm, hu],
apply is_open_inter u_open hs },
{ assume h t ht,
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, _⟩,
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self] }
end
lemma continuous_on.preimage_open_of_open {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hs : is_open s) (ht : is_open t) : is_open (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) :=
(continuous_on_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
lemma continuous_on.preimage_closed_of_closed {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hs : is_closed s) (ht : is_closed t) : is_closed (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) :=
begin
rcases continuous_on_iff_is_closed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩,
rw [inter_comm, hu.2],
apply is_closed_inter hu.1 hs
end
lemma continuous_on.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hs : is_open s) : s ∩ f⁻¹' (interior t) ⊆ s ∩ interior (f⁻¹' t) :=
calc s ∩ f ⁻¹' (interior t)
= interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (interior t)) :
(interior_eq_of_open (hf.preimage_open_of_open hs is_open_interior)).symm
... ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :
interior_mono (inter_subset_inter (subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
... = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :
by rw [interior_inter, interior_eq_of_open hs]
lemma continuous_on_of_locally_continuous_on {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(h : ∀x∈s, ∃t, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ continuous_on f (s ∩ t)) : continuous_on f s :=
begin
assume x xs,
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩,
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩,
rwa [continuous_within_at, ← nhds_within_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
end
lemma continuous_on_open_of_generate_from {β : Type*} {s : set α} {T : set (set β)} {f : α → β}
(hs : is_open s) (h : ∀t ∈ T, is_open (s ∩ f⁻¹' t)) :
@continuous_on α β _ (topological_space.generate_from T) f s :=
begin
rw continuous_on_open_iff,
assume t ht,
induction ht with u hu u v Tu Tv hu hv U hU hU',
{ exact h u hu },
{ simp only [preimage_univ, inter_univ], exact hs },
{ have : s ∩ f ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) = (s ∩ f ⁻¹' u) ∩ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' v),
by { ext x, simp, split, finish, finish },
rw this,
exact is_open_inter hu hv },
{ rw [preimage_sUnion, inter_bUnion],
exact is_open_bUnion hU' },
{ exact hs }
end
lemma continuous_within_at.prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : set α} {x : α}
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (hg : continuous_within_at g s x) :
continuous_within_at (λx, (f x, g x)) s x :=
hf.prod_mk_nhds hg
lemma continuous_on.prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : set α}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) : continuous_on (λx, (f x, g x)) s :=
λx hx, continuous_within_at.prod (hf x hx) (hg x hx)
|
b5aecb49e0c9617852e6960383e24222e3e00e97 | 097294e9b80f0d9893ac160b9c7219aa135b51b9 | /instructor/types/identifier_types.lean | 653fd5a04f29740ebf21403b6e5f601a69a24d3e | [] | no_license | AbigailCastro17/CS2102-Discrete-Math | cf296251be9418ce90206f5e66bde9163e21abf9 | d741e4d2d6a9b2e0c8380e51706218b8f608cee4 | refs/heads/main | 1,682,891,087,358 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 368,749,959 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 412 | lean | /-
Identifiers, bindings, types
-/
/-
Identifiers are terms in Lean. All terms have
types. So identifiers have types. The type of
an identifier is the type of the term to which
the identifier is bound.
-/
def b' : bool := (tt : bool) -- types explicit
def b := tt -- types inferred
-- type inference
def s : string := "I love logic!"
def n : ℕ := 1
def n' := 1 -- Lean assumes (1 : ℕ)
|
0072dffae043948ea70d89681af40a26d7bf29f1 | e00ea76a720126cf9f6d732ad6216b5b824d20a7 | /src/data/equiv/list.lean | bb378be238a5230f12c228c8c5521e69d2795182 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | vaibhavkarve/mathlib | a574aaf68c0a431a47fa82ce0637f0f769826bfe | 17f8340912468f49bdc30acdb9a9fa02eeb0473a | refs/heads/master | 1,621,263,802,637 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 250,833,447 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,410,341,000 | 1,585,410,341,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,362 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
Additional equiv and encodable instances for lists, finsets, and fintypes.
-/
import data.equiv.denumerable data.nat.pairing order.order_iso
data.array.lemmas data.fintype
open nat list
namespace encodable
variables {α : Type*}
section list
variable [encodable α]
def encode_list : list α → ℕ
| [] := 0
| (a::l) := succ (mkpair (encode a) (encode_list l))
def decode_list : ℕ → option (list α)
| 0 := some []
| (succ v) := match unpair v, unpair_le_right v with
| (v₁, v₂), h :=
have v₂ < succ v, from lt_succ_of_le h,
(::) <$> decode α v₁ <*> decode_list v₂
end
instance list : encodable (list α) :=
⟨encode_list, decode_list, λ l,
by induction l with a l IH; simp [encode_list, decode_list, unpair_mkpair, encodek, *]⟩
@[simp] theorem encode_list_nil : encode (@nil α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem encode_list_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
encode (a :: l) = succ (mkpair (encode a) (encode l)) := rfl
@[simp] theorem decode_list_zero : decode (list α) 0 = some [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem decode_list_succ (v : ℕ) :
decode (list α) (succ v) =
(::) <$> decode α v.unpair.1 <*> decode (list α) v.unpair.2 :=
show decode_list (succ v) = _, begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
simp [decode_list, e], refl
end
theorem length_le_encode : ∀ (l : list α), length l ≤ encode l
| [] := _root_.zero_le _
| (a :: l) := succ_le_succ $
le_trans (length_le_encode l) (le_mkpair_right _ _)
end list
section finset
variables [encodable α]
private def enle : α → α → Prop := encode ⁻¹'o (≤)
private lemma enle.is_linear_order : is_linear_order α enle :=
(order_embedding.preimage ⟨encode, encode_injective⟩ (≤)).is_linear_order
private def decidable_enle (a b : α) : decidable (enle a b) :=
by unfold enle order.preimage; apply_instance
local attribute [instance] enle.is_linear_order decidable_enle
def encode_multiset (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
encode (s.sort enle)
def decode_multiset (n : ℕ) : option (multiset α) :=
coe <$> decode (list α) n
instance multiset : encodable (multiset α) :=
⟨encode_multiset, decode_multiset,
λ s, by simp [encode_multiset, decode_multiset, encodek]⟩
end finset
def encodable_of_list [decidable_eq α] (l : list α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ l) : encodable α :=
⟨λ a, index_of a l, l.nth, λ a, index_of_nth (H _)⟩
def trunc_encodable_of_fintype (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : trunc (encodable α) :=
@@quot.rec_on_subsingleton _
(λ s : multiset α, (∀ x:α, x ∈ s) → trunc (encodable α)) _
finset.univ.1
(λ l H, trunc.mk $ encodable_of_list l H)
finset.mem_univ
instance vector [encodable α] {n} : encodable (vector α n) :=
encodable.subtype
instance fin_arrow [encodable α] {n} : encodable (fin n → α) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.vector_equiv_fin _ _).symm
instance fin_pi (n) (π : fin n → Type*) [∀i, encodable (π i)] : encodable (Πi, π i) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma (fin n) π)
instance array [encodable α] {n} : encodable (array n α) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.array_equiv_fin _ _)
instance finset [encodable α] : encodable (finset α) :=
by haveI := decidable_eq_of_encodable α; exact
of_equiv {s : multiset α // s.nodup}
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, ⟨a, b⟩, λ⟨a, b⟩, ⟨a, b⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl, λ⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
def fintype_arrow (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [fintype α] [decidable_eq α] [encodable β] :
trunc (encodable (α → β)) :=
(fintype.equiv_fin α).map $
λf, encodable.of_equiv (fin (fintype.card α) → β) $
equiv.arrow_congr f (equiv.refl _)
def fintype_pi (α : Type*) (π : α → Type*) [fintype α] [decidable_eq α] [∀a, encodable (π a)] :
trunc (encodable (Πa, π a)) :=
(encodable.trunc_encodable_of_fintype α).bind $ λa,
(@fintype_arrow α (Σa, π a) _ _ (@encodable.sigma _ _ a _)).bind $ λf,
trunc.mk $ @encodable.of_equiv _ _ (@encodable.subtype _ _ f _) (equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma α π)
/-- The elements of a `fintype` as a sorted list. -/
def sorted_univ (α) [fintype α] [encodable α] : list α :=
finset.univ.sort (encodable.encode' α ⁻¹'o (≤))
theorem mem_sorted_univ {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] (x : α) : x ∈ sorted_univ α :=
(finset.mem_sort _).2 (finset.mem_univ _)
theorem length_sorted_univ {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] : (sorted_univ α).length = fintype.card α :=
finset.length_sort _
theorem sorted_univ_nodup {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] : (sorted_univ α).nodup :=
finset.sort_nodup _ _
/-- An encodable `fintype` is equivalent a `fin`.-/
def fintype_equiv_fin {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] :
α ≃ fin (fintype.card α) :=
begin
haveI : decidable_eq α := encodable.decidable_eq_of_encodable _,
transitivity,
{ exact fintype.equiv_fin_of_forall_mem_list mem_sorted_univ (@sorted_univ_nodup α _ _) },
exact equiv.cast (congr_arg _ (@length_sorted_univ α _ _))
end
instance fintype_arrow_of_encodable {α β : Type*} [encodable α] [fintype α] [encodable β] :
encodable (α → β) :=
of_equiv (fin (fintype.card α) → β) $ equiv.arrow_congr fintype_equiv_fin (equiv.refl _)
end encodable
namespace denumerable
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [denumerable α] [denumerable β]
open encodable
section list
theorem denumerable_list_aux : ∀ n : ℕ,
∃ a ∈ @decode_list α _ n, encode_list a = n
| 0 := ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
| (succ v) := begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
have h := unpair_le_right v,
rw e at h,
rcases have v₂ < succ v, from lt_succ_of_le h,
denumerable_list_aux v₂ with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
simp at h₁,
simp [decode_list, e, h₂, h₁, encode_list, mkpair_unpair' e]
end
instance denumerable_list : denumerable (list α) := ⟨denumerable_list_aux⟩
@[simp] theorem list_of_nat_zero : of_nat (list α) 0 = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem list_of_nat_succ (v : ℕ) :
of_nat (list α) (succ v) =
of_nat α v.unpair.1 :: of_nat (list α) v.unpair.2 :=
of_nat_of_decode $ show decode_list (succ v) = _,
begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
simp [decode_list, e],
rw [show decode_list v₂ = decode (list α) v₂,
from rfl, decode_eq_of_nat]; refl
end
end list
section multiset
def lower : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m - n) :: lower l m
def raise : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m + n) :: raise l (m + n)
lemma lower_raise : ∀ l n, lower (raise l n) n = l
| [] n := rfl
| (m :: l) n := by simp [raise, lower, nat.add_sub_cancel, lower_raise]
lemma raise_lower : ∀ {l n}, list.sorted (≤) (n :: l) → raise (lower l n) n = l
| [] n h := rfl
| (m :: l) n h :=
have n ≤ m, from list.rel_of_sorted_cons h _ (l.mem_cons_self _),
by simp [raise, lower, nat.sub_add_cancel this,
raise_lower (list.sorted_of_sorted_cons h)]
lemma raise_chain : ∀ l n, list.chain (≤) n (raise l n)
| [] n := list.chain.nil
| (m :: l) n := list.chain.cons (nat.le_add_left _ _) (raise_chain _ _)
lemma raise_sorted : ∀ l n, list.sorted (≤) (raise l n)
| [] n := list.sorted_nil
| (m :: l) n := (list.chain_iff_pairwise (@le_trans _ _)).1 (raise_chain _ _)
/- Warning: this is not the same encoding as used in `encodable` -/
instance multiset : denumerable (multiset α) := mk' ⟨
λ s : multiset α, encode $ lower ((s.map encode).sort (≤)) 0,
λ n, multiset.map (of_nat α) (raise (of_nat (list ℕ) n) 0),
λ s, by have := raise_lower
(list.sorted_cons.2 ⟨λ n _, zero_le n, (s.map encode).sort_sorted _⟩);
simp [-multiset.coe_map, this],
λ n, by simp [-multiset.coe_map, list.merge_sort_eq_self _ (raise_sorted _ _), lower_raise]⟩
end multiset
section finset
def lower' : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m - n) :: lower' l (m + 1)
def raise' : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m + n) :: raise' l (m + n + 1)
lemma lower_raise' : ∀ l n, lower' (raise' l n) n = l
| [] n := rfl
| (m :: l) n := by simp [raise', lower', nat.add_sub_cancel, lower_raise']
lemma raise_lower' : ∀ {l n}, (∀ m ∈ l, n ≤ m) → list.sorted (<) l → raise' (lower' l n) n = l
| [] n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (m :: l) n h₁ h₂ :=
have n ≤ m, from h₁ _ (l.mem_cons_self _),
by simp [raise', lower', nat.sub_add_cancel this, raise_lower'
(list.rel_of_sorted_cons h₂ : ∀ a ∈ l, m < a) (list.sorted_of_sorted_cons h₂)]
lemma raise'_chain : ∀ l {m n}, m < n → list.chain (<) m (raise' l n)
| [] m n h := list.chain.nil
| (a :: l) m n h := list.chain.cons
(lt_of_lt_of_le h (nat.le_add_left _ _)) (raise'_chain _ (lt_succ_self _))
lemma raise'_sorted : ∀ l n, list.sorted (<) (raise' l n)
| [] n := list.sorted_nil
| (m :: l) n := (list.chain_iff_pairwise (@lt_trans _ _)).1
(raise'_chain _ (lt_succ_self _))
def raise'_finset (l : list ℕ) (n : ℕ) : finset ℕ :=
⟨raise' l n, (raise'_sorted _ _).imp (@ne_of_lt _ _)⟩
/- Warning: this is not the same encoding as used in `encodable` -/
instance finset : denumerable (finset α) := mk' ⟨
λ s : finset α, encode $ lower' ((s.map (eqv α).to_embedding).sort (≤)) 0,
λ n, finset.map (eqv α).symm.to_embedding (raise'_finset (of_nat (list ℕ) n) 0),
λ s, finset.eq_of_veq $ by simp [-multiset.coe_map, raise'_finset,
raise_lower' (λ n _, zero_le n) (finset.sort_sorted_lt _)],
λ n, by simp [-multiset.coe_map, finset.map, raise'_finset, finset.sort,
list.merge_sort_eq_self (≤) ((raise'_sorted _ _).imp (@le_of_lt _ _)),
lower_raise']⟩
end finset
end denumerable
namespace equiv
/-- The type lists on unit is canonically equivalent to the natural numbers. -/
def list_unit_equiv : list unit ≃ ℕ :=
{ to_fun := list.length,
inv_fun := list.repeat (),
left_inv := λ u, list.injective_length (by simp),
right_inv := λ n, list.length_repeat () n }
def list_nat_equiv_nat : list ℕ ≃ ℕ := denumerable.eqv _
def list_equiv_self_of_equiv_nat {α : Type} (e : α ≃ ℕ) : list α ≃ α :=
calc list α ≃ list ℕ : list_equiv_of_equiv e
... ≃ ℕ : list_nat_equiv_nat
... ≃ α : e.symm
end equiv
|
58db610ea8e067c723c1318f25981418f78f9a4e | 07c6143268cfb72beccd1cc35735d424ebcb187b | /src/linear_algebra/basic.lean | e5b380bf5488b5a436913372b9cfeabd322ed287 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | khoek/mathlib | bc49a842910af13a3c372748310e86467d1dc766 | aa55f8b50354b3e11ba64792dcb06cccb2d8ee28 | refs/heads/master | 1,588,232,063,837 | 1,587,304,803,000 | 1,587,304,803,000 | 176,688,517 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,553,070,585,000 | 1,553,070,585,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 78,692 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import algebra.pi_instances data.finsupp data.equiv.mul_add order.order_iso
/-!
# Linear algebra
This file defines the basics of linear algebra. It sets up the "categorical/lattice structure" of
modules over a ring, submodules, and linear maps. If `p` and `q` are submodules of a module, `p ≤ q`
means that `p ⊆ q`.
Many of the relevant definitions, including `module`, `submodule`, and `linear_map`, are found in
`src/algebra/module.lean`.
## Main definitions
* Many constructors for linear maps, including `prod` and `coprod`
* `submodule.span s` is defined to be the smallest submodule containing the set `s`.
* If `p` is a submodule of `M`, `submodule.quotient p` is the quotient of `M` with respect to `p`:
that is, elements of `M` are identified if their difference is in `p`. This is itself a module.
* The kernel `ker` and range `range` of a linear map are submodules of the domain and codomain
respectively.
* `linear_equiv M M₂`, the type of linear equivalences between `M` and `M₂`, is a structure that
extends `linear_map` and `equiv`.
* The general linear group is defined to be the group of invertible linear maps from `M` to itself.
## Main statements
* The first and second isomorphism laws for modules are proved as `quot_ker_equiv_range` and
`sup_quotient_equiv_quotient_inf`.
## Notations
* We continue to use the notation `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of linear maps from `M` to `M₂` over the
ring `R`.
* We introduce the notations `M ≃ₗ M₂` and `M ≃ₗ[R] M₂` for `linear_equiv M M₂`. In the first, the
ring `R` is implicit.
## Implementation notes
We note that, when constructing linear maps, it is convenient to use operations defined on bundled
maps (`prod`, `coprod`, arithmetic operations like `+`) instead of defining a function and proving
it is linear.
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module
-/
open function
reserve infix ` ≃ₗ `:25
universes u v w x y z u' v' w' y'
variables {R : Type u} {K : Type u'} {M : Type v} {V : Type v'} {M₂ : Type w} {V₂ : Type w'}
variables {M₃ : Type y} {V₃ : Type y'} {M₄ : Type z} {ι : Type x}
namespace finsupp
lemma smul_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {R : Type w} {M : Type y}
[has_zero β] [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{v : α →₀ β} {c : R} {h : α → β → M} :
c • (v.sum h) = v.sum (λa b, c • h a b) :=
finset.smul_sum
end finsupp
section
open_locale classical
/-- decomposing `x : ι → R` as a sum along the canonical basis -/
lemma pi_eq_sum_univ {ι : Type u} [fintype ι] {R : Type v} [semiring R] (x : ι → R) :
x = finset.sum finset.univ (λi:ι, x i • (λj, if i = j then 1 else 0)) :=
begin
ext k,
rw pi.finset_sum_apply,
have : finset.sum finset.univ (λ (x_1 : ι), x x_1 * ite (k = x_1) 1 0) = x k,
by { have := finset.sum_mul_boole finset.univ x k, rwa if_pos (finset.mem_univ _) at this },
rw ← this,
apply finset.sum_congr rfl (λl hl, _),
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_ite, pi.smul_apply],
conv_lhs { rw eq_comm }
end
end
namespace linear_map
section
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃] [add_comm_group M₄]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [module R M₄]
variables (f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
include R
@[simp] theorem comp_id : f.comp id = f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp : id.comp f = f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, rfl
theorem comp_assoc (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (h : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) : (h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
/-- A linear map `f : M₂ → M` whose values lie in a submodule `p ⊆ M` can be restricted to a
linear map M₂ → p. -/
def cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (h : ∀c, f c ∈ p) : M₂ →ₗ[R] p :=
by refine {to_fun := λc, ⟨f c, h c⟩, ..}; intros; apply set_coe.ext; simp
@[simp] theorem cod_restrict_apply (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) {h} (x : M₂) :
(cod_restrict p f h x : M) = f x := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀b, f b ∈ p) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M) :
(cod_restrict p f h).comp g = cod_restrict p (f.comp g) (assume b, h _) :=
ext $ assume b, rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_comp_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀b, f b ∈ p) :
p.subtype.comp (cod_restrict p f h) = f :=
ext $ assume b, rfl
/-- If a function `g` is a left and right inverse of a linear map `f`, then `g` is linear itself. -/
def inverse (g : M₂ → M) (h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) : M₂ →ₗ[R] M :=
by dsimp [left_inverse, function.right_inverse] at h₁ h₂; exact
⟨g, λ x y, by rw [← h₁ (g (x + y)), ← h₁ (g x + g y)]; simp [h₂],
λ a b, by rw [← h₁ (g (a • b)), ← h₁ (a • g b)]; simp [h₂]⟩
/-- The constant 0 map is linear. -/
instance : has_zero (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨⟨λ _, 0, by simp, by simp⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply (x : M) : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) x = 0 := rfl
/-- The negation of a linear map is linear. -/
instance : has_neg (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨λ b, - f b, by simp [add_comm], by simp⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply (x : M) : (- f) x = - f x := rfl
/-- The sum of two linear maps is linear. -/
instance : has_add (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨λ b, f b + g b, by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm], by simp [smul_add]⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply (x : M) : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
/-- The type of linear maps is an additive group. -/
instance : add_comm_group (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..};
intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
instance linear_map.is_add_group_hom : is_add_group_hom f :=
{ map_add := f.add }
instance linear_map_apply_is_add_group_hom (a : M) :
is_add_group_hom (λ f : M →ₗ[R] M₂, f a) :=
{ map_add := λ f g, linear_map.add_apply f g a }
lemma sum_apply (t : finset ι) (f : ι → M →ₗ[R] M₂) (b : M) :
t.sum f b = t.sum (λd, f d b) :=
(t.sum_hom (λ g : M →ₗ[R] M₂, g b)).symm
@[simp] lemma sub_apply (x : M) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
/-- `λb, f b • x` is a linear map. -/
def smul_right (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (x : M) : M₂ →ₗ[R] M :=
⟨λb, f b • x, by simp [add_smul], by simp [smul_smul]⟩.
@[simp] theorem smul_right_apply (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (x : M) (c : M₂) :
(smul_right f x : M₂ → M) c = f c • x := rfl
instance : has_one (M →ₗ[R] M) := ⟨linear_map.id⟩
instance : has_mul (M →ₗ[R] M) := ⟨linear_map.comp⟩
@[simp] lemma one_app (x : M) : (1 : M →ₗ[R] M) x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_app (A B : M →ₗ[R] M) (x : M) : (A * B) x = A (B x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_zero : f.comp (0 : M₃ →ₗ[R] M) = 0 :=
ext $ assume c, by rw [comp_apply, zero_apply, zero_apply, f.map_zero]
@[simp] theorem zero_comp : (0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp f = 0 :=
rfl
section
variables (R M)
include M
instance endomorphism_ring : ring (M →ₗ[R] M) :=
by refine {mul := (*), one := 1, ..linear_map.add_comm_group, ..};
{ intros, apply linear_map.ext, simp }
end
section
open_locale classical
/-- A linear map `f` applied to `x : ι → R` can be computed using the image under `f` of elements
of the canonical basis. -/
lemma pi_apply_eq_sum_univ [fintype ι] (f : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) (x : ι → R) :
f x = finset.sum finset.univ (λi:ι, x i • (f (λj, if i = j then 1 else 0))) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [pi_eq_sum_univ x, f.map_sum] },
apply finset.sum_congr rfl (λl hl, _),
rw f.map_smul
end
end
section
variables (R M M₂)
/-- The first projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M := ⟨prod.fst, λ x y, rfl, λ x y, rfl⟩
/-- The second projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂ := ⟨prod.snd, λ x y, rfl, λ x y, rfl⟩
end
@[simp] theorem fst_apply (x : M × M₂) : fst R M M₂ x = x.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_apply (x : M × M₂) : snd R M M₂ x = x.2 := rfl
/-- The prod of two linear maps is a linear map. -/
def prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (f x, g x),
add := λ x y, by simp only [prod.mk_add_mk, map_add],
smul := λ c x, by simp only [prod.smul_mk, map_smul] }
@[simp] theorem prod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (x : M) :
prod f g x = (f x, g x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem fst_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(fst R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = f := by ext; refl
@[simp] theorem snd_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(snd R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = g := by ext; refl
@[simp] theorem pair_fst_snd : prod (fst R M M₂) (snd R M M₂) = linear_map.id :=
by ext; refl
section
variables (R M M₂)
/-- The left injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inl : M →ₗ[R] M × M₂ := by refine ⟨prod.inl, _, _⟩; intros; simp [prod.inl]
/-- The right injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inr : M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ := by refine ⟨prod.inr, _, _⟩; intros; simp [prod.inr]
end
@[simp] theorem inl_apply (x : M) : inl R M M₂ x = (x, 0) := rfl
@[simp] theorem inr_apply (x : M₂) : inr R M M₂ x = (0, x) := rfl
/-- The coprod function `λ x : M × M₂, f x.1 + g x.2` is a linear map. -/
def coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, f x.1 + g x.2,
add := λ x y, by simp only [map_add, prod.snd_add, prod.fst_add]; cc,
smul := λ x y, by simp only [smul_add, prod.smul_snd, prod.smul_fst, map_smul] }
@[simp] theorem coprod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (x : M) (y : M₂) :
coprod f g (x, y) = f x + g y := rfl
@[simp] theorem coprod_inl (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(coprod f g).comp (inl R M M₂) = f :=
by ext; simp only [map_zero, add_zero, coprod_apply, inl_apply, comp_apply]
@[simp] theorem coprod_inr (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(coprod f g).comp (inr R M M₂) = g :=
by ext; simp only [map_zero, coprod_apply, inr_apply, zero_add, comp_apply]
@[simp] theorem coprod_inl_inr : coprod (inl R M M₂) (inr R M M₂) = linear_map.id :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp only [prod.mk_add_mk, add_zero, id_apply, coprod_apply,
inl_apply, inr_apply, zero_add]
theorem fst_eq_coprod : fst R M M₂ = coprod linear_map.id 0 := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
theorem snd_eq_coprod : snd R M M₂ = coprod 0 linear_map.id := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
theorem inl_eq_prod : inl R M M₂ = prod linear_map.id 0 := rfl
theorem inr_eq_prod : inr R M M₂ = prod 0 linear_map.id := rfl
/-- `prod.map` of two linear maps. -/
def prod_map (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : (M × M₂) →ₗ[R] (M₃ × M₄) :=
(f.comp (fst R M M₂)).prod (g.comp (snd R M M₂))
@[simp] theorem prod_map_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) :
f.prod_map g x = (f x.1, g x.2) := rfl
end
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
variables (f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
include R
instance : has_scalar R (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨λ a f,
⟨λ b, a • f b, by simp [smul_add], by simp [smul_smul, mul_comm]⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (a : R) (x : M) : (a • f) x = a • f x := rfl
instance : module R (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
module.of_core $ by refine { smul := (•), ..};
intros; ext; simp [smul_add, add_smul, smul_smul]
/-- Composition by `f : M₂ → M₃` is a linear map from the space of linear maps `M → M₂`
to the space of linear maps `M₂ → M₃`. -/
def comp_right (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) →ₗ[R] (M →ₗ[R] M₃) :=
⟨linear_map.comp f,
λ _ _, linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.2 _ _,
λ _ _, linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.3 _ _⟩
theorem smul_comp (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (a : R) : (a • g).comp f = a • (g.comp f) :=
rfl
theorem comp_smul (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (a : R) : g.comp (a • f) = a • (g.comp f) :=
ext $ assume b, by rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, g.map_smul]; refl
/--
The family of linear maps `M₂ → M` parameterised by `f ∈ M₂ → R`, `x ∈ M`, is linear in `f`, `x`.
-/
def smul_rightₗ : (M₂ →ₗ[R] R) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M :=
{ to_fun := λ f, {
to_fun := linear_map.smul_right f,
add := λ m m', by { ext, apply smul_add, },
smul := λ c m, by { ext, apply smul_comm, } },
add := λ f f', by { ext, apply add_smul, },
smul := λ c f, by { ext, apply mul_smul, } }
@[simp] lemma smul_rightₗ_apply (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (x : M) (c : M₂) :
(smul_rightₗ : (M₂ →ₗ R) →ₗ M →ₗ M₂ →ₗ M) f x c = (f c) • x := rfl
end comm_ring
end linear_map
namespace submodule
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
variables (p p' : submodule R M) (q q' : submodule R M₂)
variables {r : R} {x y : M}
open set
instance : partial_order (submodule R M) :=
partial_order.lift (coe : submodule R M → set M) (λ a b, ext') (by apply_instance)
variables {p p'}
lemma le_def : p ≤ p' ↔ (p : set M) ⊆ p' := iff.rfl
lemma le_def' : p ≤ p' ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x ∈ p' := iff.rfl
lemma lt_def : p < p' ↔ (p : set M) ⊂ p' := iff.rfl
lemma not_le_iff_exists : ¬ (p ≤ p') ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ∉ p' := not_subset
lemma exists_of_lt {p p' : submodule R M} : p < p' → ∃ x ∈ p', x ∉ p := exists_of_ssubset
lemma lt_iff_le_and_exists : p < p' ↔ p ≤ p' ∧ ∃ x ∈ p', x ∉ p :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_le_iff_exists]
/-- If two submodules p and p' satisfy p ⊆ p', then `of_le p p'` is the linear map version of this
inclusion. -/
def of_le (h : p ≤ p') : p →ₗ[R] p' :=
p.subtype.cod_restrict p' $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, h hx
@[simp] theorem coe_of_le (h : p ≤ p') (x : p) :
(of_le h x : M) = x := rfl
theorem of_le_apply (h : p ≤ p') (x : p) : of_le h x = ⟨x, h x.2⟩ := rfl
variables (p p')
lemma subtype_comp_of_le (p q : submodule R M) (h : p ≤ q) :
q.subtype.comp (of_le h) = p.subtype :=
by { ext ⟨b, hb⟩, refl }
/-- The set `{0}` is the bottom element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : has_bot (submodule R M) :=
⟨by split; try {exact {0}}; simp {contextual := tt}⟩
instance inhabited' : inhabited (submodule R M) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp] lemma bot_coe : ((⊥ : submodule R M) : set M) = {0} := rfl
section
variables (R)
@[simp] lemma mem_bot : x ∈ (⊥ : submodule R M) ↔ x = 0 := mem_singleton_iff
end
instance : order_bot (submodule R M) :=
{ bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ p x, by simp {contextual := tt},
..submodule.partial_order }
/-- The universal set is the top element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : has_top (submodule R M) :=
⟨by split; try {exact set.univ}; simp⟩
@[simp] lemma top_coe : ((⊤ : submodule R M) : set M) = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_top : x ∈ (⊤ : submodule R M) := trivial
lemma eq_bot_of_zero_eq_one (zero_eq_one : (0 : R) = 1) : p = ⊥ :=
by ext x; simp [semimodule.eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one x zero_eq_one]
instance : order_top (submodule R M) :=
{ top := ⊤,
le_top := λ p x _, trivial,
..submodule.partial_order }
instance : has_Inf (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ S, {
carrier := ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s,
zero := by simp,
add := by simp [add_mem] {contextual := tt},
smul := by simp [smul_mem] {contextual := tt} }⟩
private lemma Inf_le' {S : set (submodule R M)} {p} : p ∈ S → Inf S ≤ p :=
bInter_subset_of_mem
private lemma le_Inf' {S : set (submodule R M)} {p} : (∀p' ∈ S, p ≤ p') → p ≤ Inf S :=
subset_bInter
instance : has_inf (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ p p', {
carrier := p ∩ p',
zero := by simp,
add := by simp [add_mem] {contextual := tt},
smul := by simp [smul_mem] {contextual := tt} }⟩
instance : complete_lattice (submodule R M) :=
{ sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
le_sup_left := λ a b, le_Inf' $ λ x ⟨ha, hb⟩, ha,
le_sup_right := λ a b, le_Inf' $ λ x ⟨ha, hb⟩, hb,
sup_le := λ a b c h₁ h₂, Inf_le' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
inf := (⊓),
le_inf := λ a b c, subset_inter,
inf_le_left := λ a b, inter_subset_left _ _,
inf_le_right := λ a b, inter_subset_right _ _,
Sup := λtt, Inf {t | ∀t'∈tt, t' ≤ t},
le_Sup := λ s p hs, le_Inf' $ λ p' hp', hp' _ hs,
Sup_le := λ s p hs, Inf_le' hs,
Inf := Inf,
le_Inf := λ s a, le_Inf',
Inf_le := λ s a, Inf_le',
..submodule.order_top,
..submodule.order_bot }
instance : add_comm_monoid (submodule R M) :=
{ add := (⊔),
add_assoc := λ _ _ _, sup_assoc,
zero := ⊥,
zero_add := λ _, bot_sup_eq,
add_zero := λ _, sup_bot_eq,
add_comm := λ _ _, sup_comm }
@[simp] lemma add_eq_sup (p q : submodule R M) : p + q = p ⊔ q := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_bot : (0 : submodule R M) = ⊥ := rfl
lemma eq_top_iff' {p : submodule R M} : p = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ p :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨λ h x, @h x trivial, λ h x _, h x⟩
@[simp] theorem inf_coe : (p ⊓ p' : set M) = p ∩ p' := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inf {p p' : submodule R M} :
x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem Inf_coe (P : set (submodule R M)) : (↑(Inf P) : set M) = ⋂ p ∈ P, ↑p := rfl
@[simp] theorem infi_coe {ι} (p : ι → submodule R M) :
(↑⨅ i, p i : set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) :=
by rw [infi, Inf_coe]; ext a; simp; exact
⟨λ h i, h _ i rfl, λ h i x e, e ▸ h _⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_infi {ι} (p : ι → submodule R M) :
x ∈ (⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i :=
by rw [← mem_coe, infi_coe, mem_Inter]; refl
theorem disjoint_def {p p' : submodule R M} :
disjoint p p' ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x ∈ p' → x = (0:M) :=
show (∀ x, x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' → x ∈ ({0} : set M)) ↔ _, by simp
/-- The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂` -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) : submodule R M₂ :=
{ carrier := f '' p,
zero := ⟨0, p.zero_mem, f.map_zero⟩,
add := by rintro _ _ ⟨b₁, hb₁, rfl⟩ ⟨b₂, hb₂, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨_, p.add_mem hb₁ hb₂, f.map_add _ _⟩,
smul := by rintro a _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨_, p.smul_mem _ hb, f.map_smul _ _⟩ }
lemma map_coe (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) :
(map f p : set M₂) = f '' p := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_map {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} {x : M₂} :
x ∈ map f p ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ p ∧ f y = x := iff.rfl
theorem mem_map_of_mem {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} {r} (h : r ∈ p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
lemma map_id : map linear_map.id p = p :=
submodule.ext $ λ a, by simp
lemma map_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : submodule R M) :
map (g.comp f) p = map g (map f p) :=
submodule.ext' $ by simp [map_coe]; rw ← image_comp
lemma map_mono {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p p' : submodule R M} : p ≤ p' → map f p ≤ map f p' :=
image_subset _
@[simp] lemma map_zero : map (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) p = ⊥ :=
have ∃ (x : M), x ∈ p := ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩,
ext $ by simp [this, eq_comm]
/-- The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂` -/
def comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) : submodule R M :=
{ carrier := f ⁻¹' p,
zero := by simp,
add := λ x y h₁ h₂, by simp [p.add_mem h₁ h₂],
smul := λ a x h, by simp [p.smul_mem _ h] }
@[simp] lemma comap_coe (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) :
(comap f p : set M) = f ⁻¹' p := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M₂} :
x ∈ comap f p ↔ f x ∈ p := iff.rfl
lemma comap_id : comap linear_map.id p = p :=
submodule.ext' rfl
lemma comap_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : submodule R M₃) :
comap (g.comp f) p = comap f (comap g p) := rfl
lemma comap_mono {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {q q' : submodule R M₂} : q ≤ q' → comap f q ≤ comap f q' :=
preimage_mono
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} {q : submodule R M₂} :
map f p ≤ q ↔ p ≤ comap f q := image_subset_iff
lemma gc_map_comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)
| p q := map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp] lemma map_bot (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp] lemma map_sup (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map f (p ⊔ p') = map f p ⊔ map f p' :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[simp] lemma map_supr {ι : Sort*} (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : ι → submodule R M) :
map f (⨆i, p i) = (⨆i, map f (p i)) :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_supr
@[simp] lemma comap_top (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_inf (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : comap f (q ⊓ q') = comap f q ⊓ comap f q' := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_infi {ι : Sort*} (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : ι → submodule R M₂) :
comap f (⨅i, p i) = (⨅i, comap f (p i)) :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_infi
@[simp] lemma comap_zero : comap (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) q = ⊤ :=
ext $ by simp
lemma map_comap_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (q : submodule R M₂) : map f (comap f q) ≤ q :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
lemma le_comap_map (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) : p ≤ comap f (map f p) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
--TODO(Mario): is there a way to prove this from order properties?
lemma map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂}
{p : submodule R M} {p' : submodule R M₂} :
map f p ⊓ p' = map f (p ⊓ comap f p') :=
le_antisymm
(by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩)
(le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 inf_le_right))
lemma map_comap_subtype : map p.subtype (comap p.subtype p') = p ⊓ p' :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩; exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_bot_submodule : ∀(b : (⊥ : submodule R M)), b = 0
| ⟨b', hb⟩ := subtype.eq $ show b' = 0, from (mem_bot R).1 hb
section
variables (R)
/-- The span of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest submodule of M that contains `s`. -/
def span (s : set M) : submodule R M := Inf {p | s ⊆ p}
end
variables {s t : set M}
lemma mem_span : x ∈ span R s ↔ ∀ p : submodule R M, s ⊆ p → x ∈ p :=
mem_bInter_iff
lemma subset_span : s ⊆ span R s :=
λ x h, mem_span.2 $ λ p hp, hp h
lemma span_le {p} : span R s ≤ p ↔ s ⊆ p :=
⟨subset.trans subset_span, λ ss x h, mem_span.1 h _ ss⟩
lemma span_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : span R s ≤ span R t :=
span_le.2 $ subset.trans h subset_span
lemma span_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ p) (h₂ : p ≤ span R s) : span R s = p :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 h₁) h₂
@[simp] lemma span_eq : span R (p : set M) = p :=
span_eq_of_le _ (subset.refl _) subset_span
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for 0 and all elements of `s`, and is
preserved under addition and scalar multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements of the span of
`s`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma span_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s)
(Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (H0 : p 0)
(H1 : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(H2 : ∀ (a:R) x, p x → p (a • x)) : p x :=
(@span_le _ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨p, H0, H1, H2⟩).2 Hs h
section
variables (R M)
/-- `span` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from submodule to set. -/
protected def gi : galois_insertion (@span R M _ _ _) coe :=
{ choice := λ s _, span R s,
gc := λ s t, span_le,
le_l_u := λ s, subset_span,
choice_eq := λ s h, rfl }
end
@[simp] lemma span_empty : span R (∅ : set M) = ⊥ :=
(submodule.gi R M).gc.l_bot
@[simp] lemma span_univ : span R (univ : set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ le_def.2 $ subset_span
lemma span_union (s t : set M) : span R (s ∪ t) = span R s ⊔ span R t :=
(submodule.gi R M).gc.l_sup
lemma span_Union {ι} (s : ι → set M) : span R (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, span R (s i) :=
(submodule.gi R M).gc.l_supr
@[simp] theorem coe_supr_of_directed {ι} [hι : nonempty ι]
(S : ι → submodule R M) (H : directed (≤) S) :
((supr S : submodule R M) : set M) = ⋃ i, S i :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm _ (Union_subset $ le_supr S),
suffices : (span R (⋃ i, (S i : set M)) : set M) ⊆ ⋃ (i : ι), ↑(S i),
by simpa only [span_Union, span_eq] using this,
refine (λ x hx, span_induction hx (λ _, id) _ _ _);
simp only [mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib],
{ exact hι.elim (λ i, ⟨i, (S i).zero_mem⟩) },
{ intros x y i hi j hj,
rcases H i j with ⟨k, ik, jk⟩,
exact ⟨k, add_mem _ (ik hi) (jk hj)⟩ },
{ exact λ a x i hi, ⟨i, smul_mem _ a hi⟩ },
end
lemma mem_supr_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {b : M} (p : ι → submodule R M) (i : ι) (h : b ∈ p i) :
b ∈ (⨆i, p i) :=
have p i ≤ (⨆i, p i) := le_supr p i,
@this b h
@[simp] theorem mem_supr_of_directed {ι} [nonempty ι]
(S : ι → submodule R M) (H : directed (≤) S) {x} :
x ∈ supr S ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i :=
by { rw [← mem_coe, coe_supr_of_directed S H, mem_Union], refl }
theorem mem_Sup_of_directed {s : set (submodule R M)}
{z} (hs : s.nonempty) (hdir : directed_on (≤) s) :
z ∈ Sup s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, z ∈ y :=
begin
haveI : nonempty s := hs.to_subtype,
rw [Sup_eq_supr, supr_subtype', mem_supr_of_directed, subtype.exists],
exact (directed_on_iff_directed _).1 hdir
end
section
variables {p p'}
lemma mem_sup : x ∈ p ⊔ p' ↔ ∃ (y ∈ p) (z ∈ p'), y + z = x :=
⟨λ h, begin
rw [← span_eq p, ← span_eq p', ← span_union] at h,
apply span_induction h,
{ rintro y (h | h),
{ exact ⟨y, h, 0, by simp, by simp⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, by simp, y, h, by simp⟩ } },
{ exact ⟨0, by simp, 0, by simp⟩ },
{ rintro _ _ ⟨y₁, hy₁, z₁, hz₁, rfl⟩ ⟨y₂, hy₂, z₂, hz₂, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, add_mem _ hy₁ hy₂, _, add_mem _ hz₁ hz₂, by simp; cc⟩ },
{ rintro a _ ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, smul_mem _ a hy, _, smul_mem _ a hz, by simp [smul_add]⟩ }
end,
by rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩; exact add_mem _
((le_sup_left : p ≤ p ⊔ p') hy)
((le_sup_right : p' ≤ p ⊔ p') hz)⟩
end
lemma mem_span_singleton {y : M} : x ∈ span R ({y} : set M) ↔ ∃ a:R, a • y = x :=
⟨λ h, begin
apply span_induction h,
{ rintro y (rfl|⟨⟨⟩⟩), exact ⟨1, by simp⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, by simp⟩ },
{ rintro _ _ ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨a + b, by simp [add_smul]⟩ },
{ rintro a _ ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨a * b, by simp [smul_smul]⟩ }
end,
by rintro ⟨a, y, rfl⟩; exact
smul_mem _ _ (subset_span $ by simp)⟩
lemma span_singleton_eq_range (y : M) : (span R ({y} : set M) : set M) = range ((• y) : R → M) :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_span_singleton
lemma disjoint_span_singleton {K E : Type*} [division_ring K] [add_comm_group E] [module K E]
{s : submodule K E} {x : E} :
disjoint s (span K {x}) ↔ (x ∈ s → x = 0) :=
begin
refine disjoint_def.trans ⟨λ H hx, H x hx $ subset_span $ mem_singleton x, _⟩,
assume H y hy hyx,
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hyx,
subst y,
classical, by_cases hc : c = 0, by simp only [hc, zero_smul],
rw [s.smul_mem_iff hc] at hy,
rw [H hy, smul_zero]
end
lemma mem_span_insert {y} : x ∈ span R (insert y s) ↔ ∃ (a:R) (z ∈ span R s), x = a • y + z :=
begin
rw [← union_singleton, span_union, mem_sup],
simp [mem_span_singleton, add_comm, add_left_comm], split,
{ rintro ⟨z, hz, _, ⟨a, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, exact ⟨a, z, hz, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, z, hz, rfl⟩, exact ⟨z, hz, _, ⟨a, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma mem_span_insert' {y} : x ∈ span R (insert y s) ↔ ∃(a:R), x + a • y ∈ span R s :=
begin
rw mem_span_insert, split,
{ rintro ⟨a, z, hz, rfl⟩, exact ⟨-a, by simp [hz]⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, h⟩, exact ⟨-a, _, h, by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩ }
end
lemma span_insert_eq_span (h : x ∈ span R s) : span R (insert x s) = span R s :=
span_eq_of_le _ (set.insert_subset.mpr ⟨h, subset_span⟩) (span_mono $ subset_insert _ _)
lemma span_span : span R (span R s : set M) = span R s := span_eq _
lemma span_eq_bot : span R (s : set M) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, (x:M) = 0 :=
eq_bot_iff.trans ⟨
λ H x h, (mem_bot R).1 $ H $ subset_span h,
λ H, span_le.2 (λ x h, (mem_bot R).2 $ H x h)⟩
lemma span_singleton_eq_bot : span R ({x} : set M) = ⊥ ↔ x = 0 :=
span_eq_bot.trans $ by simp
@[simp] lemma span_image (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : span R (f '' s) = map f (span R s) :=
span_eq_of_le _ (image_subset _ subset_span) $ map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $
span_le.2 $ image_subset_iff.1 subset_span
lemma linear_eq_on (s : set M) {f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (H : ∀x∈s, f x = g x) {x} (h : x ∈ span R s) :
f x = g x :=
by apply span_induction h H; simp {contextual := tt}
lemma supr_eq_span {ι : Sort w} (p : ι → submodule R M) :
(⨆ (i : ι), p i) = submodule.span R (⋃ (i : ι), ↑(p i)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume i, subset.trans (assume m hm, set.mem_Union.mpr ⟨i, hm⟩) subset_span)
(span_le.mpr $ Union_subset_iff.mpr $ assume i m hm, mem_supr_of_mem _ i hm)
lemma span_singleton_le_iff_mem (m : M) (p : submodule R M) :
span R {m} ≤ p ↔ m ∈ p :=
by rw [span_le, singleton_subset_iff, mem_coe]
lemma mem_supr {ι : Sort w} (p : ι → submodule R M) {m : M} :
(m ∈ ⨆ i, p i) ↔ (∀ N, (∀ i, p i ≤ N) → m ∈ N) :=
begin
rw [← span_singleton_le_iff_mem, le_supr_iff],
simp only [span_singleton_le_iff_mem],
end
/-- The product of two submodules is a submodule. -/
def prod : submodule R (M × M₂) :=
{ carrier := set.prod p q,
zero := ⟨zero_mem _, zero_mem _⟩,
add := by rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩ ⟨x₂, y₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hy₁⟩ ⟨hx₂, hy₂⟩;
exact ⟨add_mem _ hx₁ hx₂, add_mem _ hy₁ hy₂⟩,
smul := by rintro a ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩;
exact ⟨smul_mem _ a hx, smul_mem _ a hy⟩ }
@[simp] lemma prod_coe :
(prod p q : set (M × M₂)) = set.prod p q := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_prod {p : submodule R M} {q : submodule R M₂} {x : M × M₂} :
x ∈ prod p q ↔ x.1 ∈ p ∧ x.2 ∈ q := set.mem_prod
lemma span_prod_le (s : set M) (t : set M₂) :
span R (set.prod s t) ≤ prod (span R s) (span R t) :=
span_le.2 $ set.prod_mono subset_span subset_span
@[simp] lemma prod_top : (prod ⊤ ⊤ : submodule R (M × M₂)) = ⊤ :=
by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma prod_bot : (prod ⊥ ⊥ : submodule R (M × M₂)) = ⊥ :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [prod.zero_eq_mk]
lemma prod_mono {p p' : submodule R M} {q q' : submodule R M₂} :
p ≤ p' → q ≤ q' → prod p q ≤ prod p' q' := prod_mono
@[simp] lemma prod_inf_prod : prod p q ⊓ prod p' q' = prod (p ⊓ p') (q ⊓ q') :=
ext' set.prod_inter_prod
@[simp] lemma prod_sup_prod : prod p q ⊔ prod p' q' = prod (p ⊔ p') (q ⊔ q') :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (sup_le
(prod_mono le_sup_left le_sup_left)
(prod_mono le_sup_right le_sup_right)) _,
simp [le_def'], intros xx yy hxx hyy,
rcases mem_sup.1 hxx with ⟨x, hx, x', hx', rfl⟩,
rcases mem_sup.1 hyy with ⟨y, hy, y', hy', rfl⟩,
refine mem_sup.2 ⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩, (x', y'), ⟨hx', hy'⟩, rfl⟩
end
-- TODO(Mario): Factor through add_subgroup
/-- The equivalence relation associated to a submodule `p`, defined by `x ≈ y` iff `y - x ∈ p`. -/
def quotient_rel : setoid M :=
⟨λ x y, x - y ∈ p, λ x, by simp,
λ x y h, by simpa using neg_mem _ h,
λ x y z h₁ h₂, by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_comm] using add_mem _ h₁ h₂⟩
/-- The quotient of a module `M` by a submodule `p ⊆ M`. -/
def quotient : Type* := quotient (quotient_rel p)
namespace quotient
/-- Map associating to an element of `M` the corresponding element of `M/p`,
when `p` is a submodule of `M`. -/
def mk {p : submodule R M} : M → quotient p := quotient.mk'
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_mk {p : submodule R M} (x : M) : (quotient.mk x : quotient p) = mk x := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk'_eq_mk {p : submodule R M} (x : M) : (quotient.mk' x : quotient p) = mk x := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_eq_mk {p : submodule R M} (x : M) : (quot.mk _ x : quotient p) = mk x := rfl
protected theorem eq {x y : M} : (mk x : quotient p) = mk y ↔ x - y ∈ p := quotient.eq'
instance : has_zero (quotient p) := ⟨mk 0⟩
instance : inhabited (quotient p) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_zero : mk 0 = (0 : quotient p) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_zero : (mk x : quotient p) = 0 ↔ x ∈ p :=
by simpa using (quotient.eq p : mk x = 0 ↔ _)
instance : has_add (quotient p) :=
⟨λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂' a b (λ a b, mk (a + b)) $
λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂, (quotient.eq p).2 $
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_comm, add_comm] using add_mem p h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_add : (mk (x + y) : quotient p) = mk x + mk y := rfl
instance : has_neg (quotient p) :=
⟨λ a, quotient.lift_on' a (λ a, mk (-a)) $
λ a b h, (quotient.eq p).2 $ by simpa using neg_mem p h⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_neg : (mk (-x) : quotient p) = -mk x := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (quotient p) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..};
repeat {rintro ⟨⟩};
simp [-mk_zero, (mk_zero p).symm, -mk_add, (mk_add p).symm, -mk_neg, (mk_neg p).symm]; cc
instance : has_scalar R (quotient p) :=
⟨λ a x, quotient.lift_on' x (λ x, mk (a • x)) $
λ x y h, (quotient.eq p).2 $ by simpa [smul_sub] using smul_mem p a h⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_smul : (mk (r • x) : quotient p) = r • mk x := rfl
instance : module R (quotient p) :=
module.of_core $ by refine {smul := (•), ..};
repeat {rintro ⟨⟩ <|> intro}; simp [smul_add, add_smul, smul_smul,
-mk_add, (mk_add p).symm, -mk_smul, (mk_smul p).symm]
end quotient
end submodule
namespace submodule
variables [field K]
variables [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V]
variables [add_comm_group V₂] [vector_space K V₂]
lemma comap_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.comap (a • f) = p.comap f :=
by ext b; simp only [submodule.mem_comap, p.smul_mem_iff h, linear_map.smul_apply]
lemma map_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.map (a • f) = p.map f :=
le_antisymm
begin rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap], exact le_refl _ end
begin rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, ← comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap], exact le_refl _ end
set_option class.instance_max_depth 40
lemma comap_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V₂) (a : K) :
p.comap (a • f) = (⨅ h : a ≠ 0, p.comap f) :=
by classical; by_cases a = 0; simp [h, comap_smul]
lemma map_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : submodule K V) (a : K) :
p.map (a • f) = (⨆ h : a ≠ 0, p.map f) :=
by classical; by_cases a = 0; simp [h, map_smul]
end submodule
namespace linear_map
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
include R
open submodule
@[simp] lemma finsupp_sum {R M M₂ γ} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
[add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂] [has_zero γ]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {t : ι →₀ γ} {g : ι → γ → M} :
f (t.sum g) = t.sum (λi d, f (g i d)) := f.map_sum
theorem map_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (h p') :
submodule.map (cod_restrict p f h) p' = comap p.subtype (p'.map f) :=
submodule.ext $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, by simp [subtype.coe_ext]
theorem comap_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf p') :
submodule.comap (cod_restrict p f hf) p' = submodule.comap f (map p.subtype p') :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, ⟨⟨_, hf x⟩, h, rfl⟩, by rintro ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩; exact h⟩
/-- The range of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`. -/
def range (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : submodule R M₂ := map f ⊤
theorem range_coe (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (range f : set M₂) = set.range f := set.image_univ
@[simp] theorem mem_range {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : ∀ {x}, x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
(set.ext_iff _ _).1 (range_coe f).
@[simp] theorem range_id : range (linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ := map_id _
theorem range_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : range (g.comp f) = map g (range f) :=
map_comp _ _ _
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : range (g.comp f) ≤ range g :=
by rw range_comp; exact map_mono le_top
theorem range_eq_top {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : range f = ⊤ ↔ surjective f :=
by rw [← submodule.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, set.range_iff_surjective]
lemma range_le_iff_comap {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M₂} : range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ :=
by rw [range, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
lemma map_le_range {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
map_mono le_top
lemma sup_range_inl_inr :
(inl R M M₂).range ⊔ (inr R M M₂).range = ⊤ :=
begin
refine eq_top_iff'.2 (λ x, mem_sup.2 _),
rcases x with ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ,
have h₁ : prod.mk x₁ (0 : M₂) ∈ (inl R M M₂).range,
by simp,
have h₂ : prod.mk (0 : M) x₂ ∈ (inr R M M₂).range,
by simp,
use [⟨x₁, 0⟩, h₁, ⟨0, x₂⟩, h₂],
simp
end
/-- The kernel of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is defined to be `comap f ⊥`. This is equivalent to the
set of `x : M` such that `f x = 0`. The kernel is a submodule of `M`. -/
def ker (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : submodule R M := comap f ⊥
@[simp] theorem mem_ker {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {y} : y ∈ ker f ↔ f y = 0 := mem_bot R
@[simp] theorem ker_id : ker (linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊥ := rfl
theorem ker_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : ker (g.comp f) = comap f (ker g) := rfl
theorem ker_le_ker_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : ker f ≤ ker (g.comp f) :=
by rw ker_comp; exact comap_mono bot_le
theorem sub_mem_ker_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {x y} : x - y ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = f y :=
by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem disjoint_ker {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} :
disjoint p (ker f) ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, f x = 0 → x = 0 :=
by simp [disjoint_def]
theorem disjoint_ker' {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} :
disjoint p (ker f) ↔ ∀ x y ∈ p, f x = f y → x = y :=
disjoint_ker.trans
⟨λ H x y hx hy h, eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ H _ (sub_mem _ hx hy) (by simp [h]),
λ H x h₁ h₂, H x 0 h₁ (zero_mem _) (by simpa using h₂)⟩
theorem inj_of_disjoint_ker {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M}
{s : set M} (h : s ⊆ p) (hd : disjoint p (ker f)) :
∀ x y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y :=
λ x y hx hy, disjoint_ker'.1 hd _ _ (h hx) (h hy)
lemma disjoint_inl_inr : disjoint (inl R M M₂).range (inr R M M₂).range :=
by simp [disjoint_def, @eq_comm M 0, @eq_comm M₂ 0] {contextual := tt}; intros; refl
theorem ker_eq_bot {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : ker f = ⊥ ↔ injective f :=
by simpa [disjoint] using @disjoint_ker' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f ⊤
theorem ker_eq_bot' {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} :
ker f = ⊥ ↔ (∀ m, f m = 0 → m = 0) :=
have h : (∀ m ∈ (⊤ : submodule R M), f m = 0 → m = 0) ↔ (∀ m, f m = 0 → m = 0),
from ⟨λ h m, h m mem_top, λ h m _, h m⟩,
by simpa [h, disjoint] using @disjoint_ker _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f ⊤
lemma le_ker_iff_map {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} : p ≤ ker f ↔ map f p = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker, eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap]
lemma ker_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf) :
ker (cod_restrict p f hf) = ker f :=
by rw [ker, comap_cod_restrict, map_bot]; refl
lemma range_cod_restrict (p : submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf) :
range (cod_restrict p f hf) = comap p.subtype f.range :=
map_cod_restrict _ _ _ _
lemma map_comap_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (q : submodule R M₂) :
map f (comap f q) = range f ⊓ q :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (map_mono le_top) (map_comap_le _ _)) $
by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, _, rfl⟩, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
lemma map_comap_eq_self {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {q : submodule R M₂} (h : q ≤ range f) :
map f (comap f q) = q :=
by rw [map_comap_eq, inf_of_le_right h]
lemma comap_map_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M) :
comap f (map f p) = p ⊔ ker f :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (sup_le (le_comap_map _ _) (comap_mono bot_le)),
rintro x ⟨y, hy, e⟩,
exact mem_sup.2 ⟨y, hy, x - y, by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 e.symm, by simp⟩
end
lemma comap_map_eq_self {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : submodule R M} (h : ker f ≤ p) :
comap f (map f p) = p :=
by rw [comap_map_eq, sup_of_le_left h]
@[simp] theorem ker_zero : ker (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, by simp
@[simp] theorem range_zero : range (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = ⊥ :=
submodule.map_zero _
theorem ker_eq_top {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} : ker f = ⊤ ↔ f = 0 :=
⟨λ h, ext $ λ x, mem_ker.1 $ h.symm ▸ trivial, λ h, h.symm ▸ ker_zero⟩
lemma range_le_bot_iff (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : range f ≤ ⊥ ↔ f = 0 :=
by rw [range_le_iff_comap]; exact ker_eq_top
lemma range_le_ker_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} : range f ≤ ker g ↔ g.comp f = 0 :=
⟨λ h, ker_eq_top.1 $ eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, h $ mem_map_of_mem trivial,
λ h x hx, mem_ker.2 $ exists.elim hx $ λ y ⟨_, hy⟩, by rw [←hy, ←comp_apply, h, zero_apply]⟩
theorem map_le_map_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : ker f = ⊥) {p p'} : map f p ≤ map f p' ↔ p ≤ p' :=
⟨λ H x hx, let ⟨y, hy, e⟩ := H ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ in ker_eq_bot.1 hf e ▸ hy, map_mono⟩
theorem map_injective {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : ker f = ⊥) : injective (map f) :=
λ p p' h, le_antisymm ((map_le_map_iff hf).1 (le_of_eq h)) ((map_le_map_iff hf).1 (ge_of_eq h))
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : range f = ⊤) {p p'} :
comap f p ≤ comap f p' ↔ p ≤ p' :=
⟨λ H x hx, by rcases range_eq_top.1 hf x with ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩; exact H hx, comap_mono⟩
theorem comap_injective {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : range f = ⊤) : injective (comap f) :=
λ p p' h, le_antisymm ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (le_of_eq h))
((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (ge_of_eq h))
theorem map_coprod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂) :
map (coprod f g) (p.prod q) = map f p ⊔ map g q :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 _)),
{ rw le_def', rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩,
exact mem_sup.2 ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, rfl⟩, _, ⟨_, h₂, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ },
{ exact λ x hx, ⟨(x, 0), by simp [hx]⟩ },
{ exact λ x hx, ⟨(0, x), by simp [hx]⟩ }
end
theorem comap_prod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃)
(p : submodule R M₂) (q : submodule R M₃) :
comap (prod f g) (p.prod q) = comap f p ⊓ comap g q :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_inf_comap (p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.comap (linear_map.fst R M M₂) ⊓ q.comap (linear_map.snd R M M₂) :=
submodule.ext $ λ x, iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_sup_map (p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.map (linear_map.inl R M M₂) ⊔ q.map (linear_map.inr R M M₂) :=
by rw [← map_coprod_prod, coprod_inl_inr, map_id]
lemma span_inl_union_inr {s : set M} {t : set M₂} :
span R (prod.inl '' s ∪ prod.inr '' t) = (span R s).prod (span R t) :=
by rw [span_union, prod_eq_sup_map, ← span_image, ← span_image]; refl
lemma ker_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
ker (prod f g) = ker f ⊓ ker g :=
by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, comap_prod_prod]; refl
end linear_map
namespace linear_map
variables [field K]
variables [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V]
variables [add_comm_group V₂] [vector_space K V₂]
lemma ker_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : ker (a • f) = ker f :=
submodule.comap_smul f _ a h
lemma ker_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) : ker (a • f) = ⨅(h : a ≠ 0), ker f :=
submodule.comap_smul' f _ a
lemma range_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : range (a • f) = range f :=
submodule.map_smul f _ a h
lemma range_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) : range (a • f) = ⨆(h : a ≠ 0), range f :=
submodule.map_smul' f _ a
end linear_map
namespace is_linear_map
lemma is_linear_map_add {R M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]:
is_linear_map R (λ (x : M × M), x.1 + x.2) :=
begin
apply is_linear_map.mk,
{ intros x y,
simp, cc },
{ intros x y,
simp [smul_add] }
end
lemma is_linear_map_sub {R M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]:
is_linear_map R (λ (x : M × M), x.1 - x.2) :=
begin
apply is_linear_map.mk,
{ intros x y,
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg] },
{ intros x y,
simp [smul_sub] }
end
end is_linear_map
namespace submodule
variables {T : ring R} [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
variables (p p' : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂)
include T
open linear_map
@[simp] theorem map_top (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map f ⊤ = range f := rfl
@[simp] theorem comap_bot (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : comap f ⊥ = ker f := rfl
@[simp] theorem ker_subtype : p.subtype.ker = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot.2 $ λ x y, subtype.eq'
@[simp] theorem range_subtype : p.subtype.range = p :=
by simpa using map_comap_subtype p ⊤
lemma map_subtype_le (p' : submodule R p) : map p.subtype p' ≤ p :=
by simpa using (map_mono le_top : map p.subtype p' ≤ p.subtype.range)
/-- Under the canonical linear map from a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`, the image of the
maximal submodule of `p` is just `p `. -/
@[simp] lemma map_subtype_top : map p.subtype (⊤ : submodule R p) = p :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem ker_of_le (p p' : submodule R M) (h : p ≤ p') : (of_le h).ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [of_le, ker_cod_restrict, ker_subtype]
lemma range_of_le (p q : submodule R M) (h : p ≤ q) : (of_le h).range = comap q.subtype p :=
by rw [← map_top, of_le, linear_map.map_cod_restrict, map_top, range_subtype]
lemma disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot (p q : submodule R M) :
disjoint p q ↔ comap p.subtype q = ⊥ :=
by rw [eq_bot_iff, ← map_le_map_iff p.ker_subtype, map_bot, map_comap_subtype]; refl
/-- If N ⊆ M then submodules of N are the same as submodules of M contained in N -/
def map_subtype.order_iso :
((≤) : submodule R p → submodule R p → Prop) ≃o
((≤) : {p' : submodule R M // p' ≤ p} → {p' : submodule R M // p' ≤ p} → Prop) :=
{ to_fun := λ p', ⟨map p.subtype p', map_subtype_le p _⟩,
inv_fun := λ q, comap p.subtype q,
left_inv := λ p', comap_map_eq_self $ by simp,
right_inv := λ ⟨q, hq⟩, subtype.eq' $ by simp [map_comap_subtype p, inf_of_le_right hq],
ord := λ p₁ p₂, (map_le_map_iff $ ker_subtype _).symm }
/-- If `p ⊆ M` is a submodule, the ordering of submodules of `p` is embedded in the ordering of
submodules of M. -/
def map_subtype.le_order_embedding :
((≤) : submodule R p → submodule R p → Prop) ≼o ((≤) : submodule R M → submodule R M → Prop) :=
(order_iso.to_order_embedding $ map_subtype.order_iso p).trans (subtype.order_embedding _ _)
@[simp] lemma map_subtype_embedding_eq (p' : submodule R p) :
map_subtype.le_order_embedding p p' = map p.subtype p' := rfl
/-- If `p ⊆ M` is a submodule, the ordering of submodules of `p` is embedded in the ordering of
submodules of M. -/
def map_subtype.lt_order_embedding :
((<) : submodule R p → submodule R p → Prop) ≼o ((<) : submodule R M → submodule R M → Prop) :=
(map_subtype.le_order_embedding p).lt_embedding_of_le_embedding
@[simp] theorem map_inl : p.map (inl R M M₂) = prod p ⊥ :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp only [and.left_comm, eq_comm, mem_map, prod.mk.inj_iff, inl_apply, mem_bot,
exists_eq_left', mem_prod]
@[simp] theorem map_inr : q.map (inr R M M₂) = prod ⊥ q :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [and.left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem comap_fst : p.comap (fst R M M₂) = prod p ⊤ :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp] theorem comap_snd : q.comap (snd R M M₂) = prod ⊤ q :=
by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp] theorem prod_comap_inl : (prod p q).comap (inl R M M₂) = p := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem prod_comap_inr : (prod p q).comap (inr R M M₂) = q := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem prod_map_fst : (prod p q).map (fst R M M₂) = p :=
by ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ q)]
@[simp] theorem prod_map_snd : (prod p q).map (snd R M M₂) = q :=
by ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ p)]
@[simp] theorem ker_inl : (inl R M M₂).ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inl]
@[simp] theorem ker_inr : (inr R M M₂).ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inr]
@[simp] theorem range_fst : (fst R M M₂).range = ⊤ :=
by rw [range, ← prod_top, prod_map_fst]
@[simp] theorem range_snd : (snd R M M₂).range = ⊤ :=
by rw [range, ← prod_top, prod_map_snd]
/-- The map from a module `M` to the quotient of `M` by a submodule `p` as a linear map. -/
def mkq : M →ₗ[R] p.quotient := ⟨quotient.mk, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp] theorem mkq_apply (x : M) : p.mkq x = quotient.mk x := rfl
/-- The map from the quotient of `M` by a submodule `p` to `M₂` induced by a linear map `f : M → M₂`
vanishing on `p`, as a linear map. -/
def liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h : p ≤ f.ker) : p.quotient →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
⟨λ x, _root_.quotient.lift_on' x f $
λ a b (ab : a - b ∈ p), eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ by simpa using h ab,
by rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩; exact f.map_add x y,
by rintro a ⟨x⟩; exact f.map_smul a x⟩
@[simp] theorem liftq_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {h} (x : M) :
p.liftq f h (quotient.mk x) = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem liftq_mkq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) : (p.liftq f h).comp p.mkq = f :=
by ext; refl
@[simp] theorem range_mkq : p.mkq.range = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff'.2 $ by rintro ⟨x⟩; exact ⟨x, trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem ker_mkq : p.mkq.ker = p :=
by ext; simp
lemma le_comap_mkq (p' : submodule R p.quotient) : p ≤ comap p.mkq p' :=
by simpa using (comap_mono bot_le : p.mkq.ker ≤ comap p.mkq p')
@[simp] theorem mkq_map_self : map p.mkq p = ⊥ :=
by rw [eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_bot, ker_mkq]; exact le_refl _
@[simp] theorem comap_map_mkq : comap p.mkq (map p.mkq p') = p ⊔ p' :=
by simp [comap_map_eq, sup_comm]
/-- The map from the quotient of `M` by submodule `p` to the quotient of `M₂` by submodule `q` along
`f : M → M₂` is linear. -/
def mapq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h : p ≤ comap f q) : p.quotient →ₗ[R] q.quotient :=
p.liftq (q.mkq.comp f) $ by simpa [ker_comp] using h
@[simp] theorem mapq_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {h} (x : M) :
mapq p q f h (quotient.mk x) = quotient.mk (f x) := rfl
theorem mapq_mkq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) {h} : (mapq p q f h).comp p.mkq = q.mkq.comp f :=
by ext x; refl
theorem comap_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) :
q.comap (p.liftq f h) = (q.comap f).map (mkq p) :=
le_antisymm
(by rintro ⟨x⟩ hx; exact ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩)
(by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, ← comap_comp, liftq_mkq]; exact le_refl _)
theorem map_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) (q : submodule R (quotient p)) :
q.map (p.liftq f h) = (q.comap p.mkq).map f :=
le_antisymm
(by rintro _ ⟨⟨x⟩, hxq, rfl⟩; exact ⟨x, hxq, rfl⟩)
(by rintro _ ⟨x, hxq, rfl⟩; exact ⟨quotient.mk x, hxq, rfl⟩)
theorem ker_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) :
ker (p.liftq f h) = (ker f).map (mkq p) := comap_liftq _ _ _ _
theorem range_liftq (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) :
range (p.liftq f h) = range f := map_liftq _ _ _ _
theorem ker_liftq_eq_bot (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) (h' : ker f ≤ p) : ker (p.liftq f h) = ⊥ :=
by rw [ker_liftq, le_antisymm h h', mkq_map_self]
/-- The correspondence theorem for modules: there is an order isomorphism between submodules of the
quotient of `M` by `p`, and submodules of `M` larger than `p`. -/
def comap_mkq.order_iso :
((≤) : submodule R p.quotient → submodule R p.quotient → Prop) ≃o
((≤) : {p' : submodule R M // p ≤ p'} → {p' : submodule R M // p ≤ p'} → Prop) :=
{ to_fun := λ p', ⟨comap p.mkq p', le_comap_mkq p _⟩,
inv_fun := λ q, map p.mkq q,
left_inv := λ p', map_comap_eq_self $ by simp,
right_inv := λ ⟨q, hq⟩, subtype.eq' $ by simp [comap_map_mkq p, sup_of_le_right hq],
ord := λ p₁ p₂, (comap_le_comap_iff $ range_mkq _).symm }
/-- The ordering on submodules of the quotient of `M` by `p` embeds into the ordering on submodules
of `M`. -/
def comap_mkq.le_order_embedding :
((≤) : submodule R p.quotient → submodule R p.quotient → Prop) ≼o ((≤) : submodule R M → submodule R M → Prop) :=
(order_iso.to_order_embedding $ comap_mkq.order_iso p).trans (subtype.order_embedding _ _)
@[simp] lemma comap_mkq_embedding_eq (p' : submodule R p.quotient) :
comap_mkq.le_order_embedding p p' = comap p.mkq p' := rfl
/-- The ordering on submodules of the quotient of `M` by `p` embeds into the ordering on submodules
of `M`. -/
def comap_mkq.lt_order_embedding :
((<) : submodule R p.quotient → submodule R p.quotient → Prop) ≼o ((<) : submodule R M → submodule R M → Prop) :=
(comap_mkq.le_order_embedding p).lt_embedding_of_le_embedding
end submodule
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A linear equivalence is an invertible linear map. -/
@[nolint doc_blame has_inhabited_instance]
structure linear_equiv (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (M₂ : Type w)
[ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
extends M →ₗ[R] M₂, M ≃ M₂
end
infix ` ≃ₗ ` := linear_equiv _
notation M ` ≃ₗ[`:50 R `] ` M₂ := linear_equiv R M M₂
namespace linear_equiv
section ring
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
section
variables [module R M] [module R M₂]
include R
instance : has_coe (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨to_linear_map⟩
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨_, λ f, f.to_fun⟩
lemma to_equiv_injective : function.injective (to_equiv : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → M ≃ M₂) :=
λ ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _⟩ ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _⟩ h, linear_equiv.mk.inj_eq.mpr (equiv.mk.inj h)
end
section
variables {module_M : module R M} {module_M₂ : module R M₂}
variables (e e' : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
@[simp] theorem coe_apply (b : M) : (e : M →ₗ[R] M₂) b = e b := rfl
section
variables {e e'}
@[ext] lemma ext (h : (e : M → M₂) = e') : e = e' :=
to_equiv_injective (equiv.eq_of_to_fun_eq h)
end
section
variables (M R)
/-- The identity map is a linear equivalence. -/
@[refl]
def refl [module R M] : M ≃ₗ[R] M := { .. linear_map.id, .. equiv.refl M }
end
@[simp] lemma refl_apply [module R M] (x : M) : refl R M x = x := rfl
/-- Linear equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ .. e.to_linear_map.inverse e.inv_fun e.left_inv e.right_inv,
.. e.to_equiv.symm }
variables {module_M₃ : module R M₃} (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃)
/-- Linear equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans : M ≃ₗ[R] M₃ :=
{ .. e₂.to_linear_map.comp e₁.to_linear_map,
.. e₁.to_equiv.trans e₂.to_equiv }
/-- A linear equivalence is an additive equivalence. -/
def to_add_equiv : M ≃+ M₂ := { map_add' := e.add, .. e }
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (c : M) :
(e₁.trans e₂) c = e₂ (e₁ c) := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (c : M₂) : e (e.symm c) = c := e.6 c
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (b : M) : e.symm (e b) = b := e.5 b
@[simp] theorem map_add (a b : M) : e (a + b) = e a + e b := e.add a b
@[simp] theorem map_zero : e 0 = 0 := e.to_linear_map.map_zero
@[simp] theorem map_neg (a : M) : e (-a) = -e a := e.to_linear_map.map_neg a
@[simp] theorem map_sub (a b : M) : e (a - b) = e a - e b :=
e.to_linear_map.map_sub a b
@[simp] theorem map_smul (c : R) (x : M) : e (c • x) = c • e x := e.smul c x
@[simp] theorem map_eq_zero_iff {x : M} : e x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
e.to_add_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
theorem map_ne_zero_iff {x : M} : e x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
e.to_add_equiv.map_ne_zero_iff
@[simp] theorem symm_symm : e.symm.symm = e := by { cases e, refl }
@[simp] theorem symm_symm_apply (x : M) : e.symm.symm x = e x :=
by { cases e, refl }
protected lemma bijective : function.bijective e := e.to_equiv.bijective
protected lemma injective : function.injective e := e.to_equiv.injective
protected lemma surjective : function.surjective e := e.to_equiv.surjective
end
section prod
variables [add_comm_group M₄]
variables {module_M : module R M} {module_M₂ : module R M₂}
variables {module_M₃ : module R M₃} {module_M₄ : module R M₄}
variables (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₃ ≃ₗ[R] M₄)
/-- Product of linear equivalences; the maps come from `equiv.prod_congr`. -/
protected def prod :
(M × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
{ add := λ x y, prod.ext (e₁.map_add _ _) (e₂.map_add _ _),
smul := λ c x, prod.ext (e₁.map_smul c _) (e₂.map_smul c _),
.. equiv.prod_congr e₁.to_equiv e₂.to_equiv }
lemma prod_symm : (e₁.prod e₂).symm = e₁.symm.prod e₂.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_apply (p) :
e₁.prod e₂ p = (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod :
(e₁.prod e₂ : (M × M₃) →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = (e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prod_map (e₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) :=
rfl
/-- Equivalence given by a block lower diagonal matrix. `e₁` and `e₂` are diagonal square blocks,
and `f` is a rectangular block below the diagonal. -/
protected def skew_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) :
(M × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ inv_fun := λ p : M₂ × M₄, (e₁.symm p.1, e₂.symm (p.2 - f (e₁.symm p.1))),
left_inv := λ p, by simp,
right_inv := λ p, by simp,
.. ((e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).comp (linear_map.fst R M M₃)).prod
((e₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄).comp (linear_map.snd R M M₃) +
f.comp (linear_map.fst R M M₃)) }
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) :
e₁.skew_prod e₂ f x = (e₁ x.1, e₂ x.2 + f x.1) := rfl
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_symm_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) :
(e₁.skew_prod e₂ f).symm x = (e₁.symm x.1, e₂.symm (x.2 - f (e₁.symm x.1))) := rfl
end prod
section
variables {module_M : module R M} {module_M₂ : module R M₂}
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- A bijective linear map is a linear equivalence. Here, bijectivity is described by saying that
the kernel of `f` is `{0}` and the range is the universal set. -/
noncomputable def of_bijective (hf₁ : f.ker = ⊥) (hf₂ : f.range = ⊤) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ ..f, ..@equiv.of_bijective _ _ f
⟨linear_map.ker_eq_bot.1 hf₁, linear_map.range_eq_top.1 hf₂⟩ }
@[simp] theorem of_bijective_apply {hf₁ hf₂} (x : M) :
of_bijective f hf₁ hf₂ x = f x := rfl
variables (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M)
/-- If a linear map has an inverse, it is a linear equivalence. -/
def of_linear (h₁ : f.comp g = linear_map.id) (h₂ : g.comp f = linear_map.id) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ inv_fun := g,
left_inv := linear_map.ext_iff.1 h₂,
right_inv := linear_map.ext_iff.1 h₁,
..f }
@[simp] theorem of_linear_apply {h₁ h₂} (x : M) : of_linear f g h₁ h₂ x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem of_linear_symm_apply {h₁ h₂} (x : M₂) : (of_linear f g h₁ h₂).symm x = g x := rfl
variables (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
@[simp] protected theorem ker : (e : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker = ⊥ :=
linear_map.ker_eq_bot.2 e.to_equiv.injective
@[simp] protected theorem range : (e : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range = ⊤ :=
linear_map.range_eq_top.2 e.to_equiv.surjective
variables (p : submodule R M)
/-- The top submodule of `M` is linearly equivalent to `M`. -/
def of_top (h : p = ⊤) : p ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, h.symm ▸ trivial⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, h⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ x, rfl,
.. p.subtype }
@[simp] theorem of_top_apply {h} (x : p) : of_top p h x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem of_top_symm_apply {h} (x : M) :
(of_top p h).symm x = ⟨x, h.symm ▸ trivial⟩ := rfl
lemma eq_bot_of_equiv [module R M₂] (e : p ≃ₗ[R] (⊥ : submodule R M₂)) :
p = ⊥ :=
begin
refine bot_unique (submodule.le_def'.2 $ assume b hb, (submodule.mem_bot R).2 _),
have := e.symm_apply_apply ⟨b, hb⟩,
rw [← e.coe_apply, submodule.eq_zero_of_bot_submodule ((e : p →ₗ[R] (⊥ : submodule R M₂)) ⟨b, hb⟩),
← e.symm.coe_apply, linear_map.map_zero] at this,
exact congr_arg (coe : p → M) this.symm
end
end
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
include R
open linear_map
set_option class.instance_max_depth 39
/-- Multiplying by a unit `a` of the ring `R` is a linear equivalence. -/
def smul_of_unit (a : units R) : M ≃ₗ[R] M :=
of_linear ((a:R) • 1 : M →ₗ M) (((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • 1 : M →ₗ M)
(by rw [smul_comp, comp_smul, smul_smul, units.mul_inv, one_smul]; refl)
(by rw [smul_comp, comp_smul, smul_smul, units.inv_mul, one_smul]; refl)
/-- A linear isomorphism between the domains and codomains of two spaces of linear maps gives a
linear isomorphism between the two function spaces. -/
def arrow_congr {R M₁ M₂ M₂₁ M₂₂ : Sort*} [comm_ring R]
[add_comm_group M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₂₁] [add_comm_group M₂₂]
[module R M₁] [module R M₂] [module R M₂₁] [module R M₂₂]
(e₁ : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂₂) :
(M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂₁) ≃ₗ[R] (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, e₂.to_linear_map.comp $ f.comp e₁.symm.to_linear_map,
inv_fun := λ f, e₂.symm.to_linear_map.comp $ f.comp e₁.to_linear_map,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext x, unfold_coes,
change e₂.inv_fun (e₂.to_fun $ f.to_fun $ e₁.inv_fun $ e₁.to_fun x) = _,
rw [e₁.left_inv, e₂.left_inv] },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext x, unfold_coes,
change e₂.to_fun (e₂.inv_fun $ f.to_fun $ e₁.to_fun $ e₁.inv_fun x) = _,
rw [e₁.right_inv, e₂.right_inv] },
add := λ f g, by { ext x, change e₂.to_fun ((f + g) (e₁.inv_fun x)) = _,
rw [linear_map.add_apply, e₂.add], refl },
smul := λ c f, by { ext x, change e₂.to_fun ((c • f) (e₁.inv_fun x)) = _,
rw [linear_map.smul_apply, e₂.smul], refl } }
/-- If M₂ and M₃ are linearly isomorphic then the two spaces of linear maps from M into M₂ and
M into M₃ are linearly isomorphic. -/
def congr_right (f : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) ≃ₗ (M →ₗ M₃) := arrow_congr (linear_equiv.refl R M) f
/-- If M and M₂ are linearly isomorphic then the two spaces of linear maps from M and M₂ to
themselves are linearly isomorphic. -/
def conj (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) : (module.End R M) ≃ₗ[R] (module.End R M₂) := arrow_congr e e
end comm_ring
section field
variables [field K] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module K M] [module K M₂] [module K M₃]
variable (M)
open linear_map
/-- Multiplying by a nonzero element `a` of the field `K` is a linear equivalence. -/
def smul_of_ne_zero (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : M ≃ₗ[K] M :=
smul_of_unit $ units.mk0 a ha
end field
end linear_equiv
namespace submodule
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
variables (p : submodule R M) (q : submodule R M₂)
lemma comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (c : R) :
comap f q ≤ comap (c • f) q :=
begin
rw le_def',
intros m h,
change c • (f m) ∈ q,
change f m ∈ q at h,
apply submodule.smul _ _ h,
end
lemma inf_comap_le_comap_add (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
comap f₁ q ⊓ comap f₂ q ≤ comap (f₁ + f₂) q :=
begin
rw le_def',
intros m h,
change f₁ m + f₂ m ∈ q,
change f₁ m ∈ q ∧ f₂ m ∈ q at h,
apply submodule.add _ h.1 h.2,
end
/-- Given modules `M`, `M₂` over a commutative ring, together with submodules `p ⊆ M`, `q ⊆ M₂`, the
set of maps $\{f ∈ Hom(M, M₂) | f(p) ⊆ q \}$ is a submodule of `Hom(M, M₂)`. -/
def compatible_maps : submodule R (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
{ carrier := {f | p ≤ comap f q},
zero := by { change p ≤ comap 0 q, rw comap_zero, refine le_top, },
add := λ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂, by { apply le_trans _ (inf_comap_le_comap_add q f₁ f₂), rw le_inf_iff,
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, },
smul := λ c f h, le_trans h (comap_le_comap_smul q f c), }
/-- Given modules `M`, `M₂` over a commutative ring, together with submodules `p ⊆ M`, `q ⊆ M₂`, the
natural map $\{f ∈ Hom(M, M₂) | f(p) ⊆ q \} \to Hom(M/p, M₂/q)$ is linear. -/
def mapq_linear : compatible_maps p q →ₗ[R] p.quotient →ₗ[R] q.quotient :=
{ to_fun := λ f, mapq _ _ f.val f.property,
add := λ x y, by { ext m', apply quotient.induction_on' m', intros m, refl, },
smul := λ c f, by { ext m', apply quotient.induction_on' m', intros m, refl, } }
end submodule
namespace equiv
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
/-- An equivalence whose underlying function is linear is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃ M₂) (h : is_linear_map R (e : M → M₂)) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ add := h.add, smul := h.smul, .. e}
end equiv
namespace linear_map
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- The first isomorphism law for modules. The quotient of `M` by the kernel of `f` is linearly
equivalent to the range of `f`. -/
noncomputable def quot_ker_equiv_range : f.ker.quotient ≃ₗ[R] f.range :=
have hr : ∀ x : f.range, ∃ y, f y = ↑x := λ x, x.2.imp $ λ _, and.right,
let F : f.ker.quotient →ₗ[R] f.range :=
f.ker.liftq (cod_restrict f.range f $ λ x, ⟨x, trivial, rfl⟩)
(λ x hx, by simp; apply subtype.coe_ext.2; simpa using hx) in
{ inv_fun := λx, submodule.quotient.mk (classical.some (hr x)),
left_inv := by rintro ⟨x⟩; exact
(submodule.quotient.eq _).2 (sub_mem_ker_iff.2 $
classical.some_spec $ hr $ F $ submodule.quotient.mk x),
right_inv := λ x : range f, subtype.eq $ classical.some_spec (hr x),
.. F }
open submodule
/--
Canonical linear map from the quotient p/(p ∩ p') to (p+p')/p', mapping x + (p ∩ p') to x + p',
where p and p' are submodules of an ambient module.
-/
def sup_quotient_to_quotient_inf (p p' : submodule R M) :
(comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).quotient →ₗ[R] (comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').quotient :=
(comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).liftq
((comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').mkq.comp (of_le le_sup_left)) begin
rw [ker_comp, of_le, comap_cod_restrict, ker_mkq, map_comap_subtype],
exact comap_mono (inf_le_inf le_sup_left (le_refl _)) end
set_option class.instance_max_depth 41
/--
Second Isomorphism Law : the canonical map from p/(p ∩ p') to (p+p')/p' as a linear isomorphism.
-/
noncomputable def sup_quotient_equiv_quotient_inf (p p' : submodule R M) :
(comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).quotient ≃ₗ[R] (comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').quotient :=
{ .. sup_quotient_to_quotient_inf p p',
.. show (comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).quotient ≃ (comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').quotient, from
@equiv.of_bijective _ _ (sup_quotient_to_quotient_inf p p') begin
constructor,
{ rw [← ker_eq_bot, sup_quotient_to_quotient_inf, ker_liftq_eq_bot],
rw [ker_comp, ker_mkq],
rintros ⟨x, hx1⟩ hx2, exact ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ },
rw [← range_eq_top, sup_quotient_to_quotient_inf, range_liftq, eq_top_iff'],
rintros ⟨x, hx⟩, rcases mem_sup.1 hx with ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
use [⟨y, hy⟩, trivial], apply (submodule.quotient.eq _).2,
change y - (y + z) ∈ p', rwa [sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, neg_mem_iff]
end }
section prod
lemma is_linear_map_prod_iso {R M M₂ M₃ : Type*}
[comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂]
[add_comm_group M₃] [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] :
is_linear_map R (λ(p : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) × (M →ₗ[R] M₃)),
(linear_map.prod p.1 p.2 : (M →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₃)))) :=
⟨λu v, rfl, λc u, rfl⟩
end prod
section pi
universe i
variables {φ : ι → Type i}
variables [∀i, add_comm_group (φ i)] [∀i, module R (φ i)]
/-- `pi` construction for linear functions. From a family of linear functions it produces a linear
function into a family of modules. -/
def pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : M₂ →ₗ[R] (Πi, φ i) :=
⟨λc i, f i c,
assume c d, funext $ assume i, (f i).add _ _, assume c d, funext $ assume i, (f i).smul _ _⟩
@[simp] lemma pi_apply (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (c : M₂) (i : ι) :
pi f c i = f i c := rfl
lemma ker_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : ker (pi f) = (⨅i:ι, ker (f i)) :=
by ext c; simp [funext_iff]; refl
lemma pi_eq_zero (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : pi f = 0 ↔ (∀i, f i = 0) :=
by simp only [linear_map.ext_iff, pi_apply, funext_iff]; exact ⟨λh a b, h b a, λh a b, h b a⟩
lemma pi_zero : pi (λi, 0 : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) = 0 :=
by ext; refl
lemma pi_comp (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₂) : (pi f).comp g = pi (λi, (f i).comp g) :=
rfl
/-- The projections from a family of modules are linear maps. -/
def proj (i : ι) : (Πi, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i :=
⟨ λa, a i, assume f g, rfl, assume c f, rfl ⟩
@[simp] lemma proj_apply (i : ι) (b : Πi, φ i) : (proj i : (Πi, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) b = b i := rfl
lemma proj_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (pi f) = f i :=
ext $ assume c, rfl
lemma infi_ker_proj : (⨅i, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ submodule.le_def'.2 $ assume a h,
begin
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] at h,
exact (mem_bot _).2 (funext $ assume i, h i)
end
section
variables (R φ)
/-- If `I` and `J` are disjoint index sets, the product of the kernels of the `J`th projections of
`φ` is linearly equivalent to the product over `I`. -/
def infi_ker_proj_equiv {I J : set ι} [decidable_pred (λi, i ∈ I)]
(hd : disjoint I J) (hu : set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) :
(⨅i ∈ J, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) ≃ₗ[R] (Πi:I, φ i) :=
begin
refine linear_equiv.of_linear
(pi $ λi, (proj (i:ι)).comp (submodule.subtype _))
(cod_restrict _ (pi $ λi, if h : i ∈ I then proj (⟨i, h⟩ : I) else 0) _) _ _,
{ assume b,
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, funext_iff, proj_apply, pi_apply],
assume j hjJ,
have : j ∉ I := assume hjI, hd ⟨hjI, hjJ⟩,
rw [dif_neg this, zero_apply] },
{ simp only [pi_comp, comp_assoc, subtype_comp_cod_restrict, proj_pi, dif_pos, subtype.val_prop'],
ext b ⟨j, hj⟩, refl },
{ ext ⟨b, hb⟩,
apply subtype.coe_ext.2,
ext j,
have hb : ∀i ∈ J, b i = 0,
{ simpa only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] using (mem_infi _).1 hb },
simp only [comp_apply, pi_apply, id_apply, proj_apply, subtype_apply, cod_restrict_apply],
split_ifs,
{ rw [dif_pos h], refl },
{ rw [dif_neg h],
exact (hb _ $ (hu trivial).resolve_left h).symm } }
end
end
section
variable [decidable_eq ι]
/-- `diag i j` is the identity map if `i = j`. Otherwise it is the constant 0 map. -/
def diag (i j : ι) : φ i →ₗ[R] φ j :=
@function.update ι (λj, φ i →ₗ[R] φ j) _ 0 i id j
lemma update_apply (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (c : M₂) (i j : ι) (b : M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) :
(update f i b j) c = update (λi, f i c) i (b c) j :=
begin
by_cases j = i,
{ rw [h, update_same, update_same] },
{ rw [update_noteq h, update_noteq h] }
end
end
section
variable [decidable_eq ι]
variables (R φ)
/-- The standard basis of the product of `φ`. -/
def std_basis (i : ι) : φ i →ₗ[R] (Πi, φ i) := pi (diag i)
lemma std_basis_apply (i : ι) (b : φ i) : std_basis R φ i b = update 0 i b :=
by ext j; rw [std_basis, pi_apply, diag, update_apply]; refl
@[simp] lemma std_basis_same (i : ι) (b : φ i) : std_basis R φ i b i = b :=
by rw [std_basis_apply, update_same]
lemma std_basis_ne (i j : ι) (h : j ≠ i) (b : φ i) : std_basis R φ i b j = 0 :=
by rw [std_basis_apply, update_noteq h]; refl
lemma ker_std_basis (i : ι) : ker (std_basis R φ i) = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot.2 $ assume f g hfg,
have std_basis R φ i f i = std_basis R φ i g i := hfg ▸ rfl,
by simpa only [std_basis_same]
lemma proj_comp_std_basis (i j : ι) : (proj i).comp (std_basis R φ j) = diag j i :=
by rw [std_basis, proj_pi]
lemma proj_std_basis_same (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (std_basis R φ i) = id :=
by ext b; simp
lemma proj_std_basis_ne (i j : ι) (h : i ≠ j) : (proj i).comp (std_basis R φ j) = 0 :=
by ext b; simp [std_basis_ne R φ _ _ h]
lemma supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj (I J : set ι) (h : disjoint I J) :
(⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) ≤ (⨅i∈J, ker (proj i)) :=
begin
refine (supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume hi, range_le_iff_comap.2 _),
simp only [(ker_comp _ _).symm, eq_top_iff, le_def', mem_ker, comap_infi, mem_infi],
assume b hb j hj,
have : i ≠ j := assume eq, h ⟨hi, eq.symm ▸ hj⟩,
rw [proj_std_basis_ne R φ j i this.symm, zero_apply]
end
lemma infi_ker_proj_le_supr_range_std_basis {I : finset ι} {J : set ι} (hu : set.univ ⊆ ↑I ∪ J) :
(⨅ i∈J, ker (proj i)) ≤ (⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) :=
submodule.le_def'.2
begin
assume b hb,
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] at hb,
rw ← show I.sum (λi, std_basis R φ i (b i)) = b,
{ ext i,
rw [pi.finset_sum_apply, ← std_basis_same R φ i (b i)],
refine finset.sum_eq_single i (assume j hjI ne, std_basis_ne _ _ _ _ ne.symm _) _,
assume hiI,
rw [std_basis_same],
exact hb _ ((hu trivial).resolve_left hiI) },
exact sum_mem _ (assume i hiI, mem_supr_of_mem _ i $ mem_supr_of_mem _ hiI $
linear_map.mem_range.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩)
end
lemma supr_range_std_basis_eq_infi_ker_proj {I J : set ι}
(hd : disjoint I J) (hu : set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) (hI : set.finite I) :
(⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) = (⨅i∈J, ker (proj i)) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj _ _ _ _ hd) _,
have : set.univ ⊆ ↑hI.to_finset ∪ J, { rwa [finset.coe_to_finset] },
refine le_trans (infi_ker_proj_le_supr_range_std_basis R φ this) (supr_le_supr $ assume i, _),
rw [← finset.mem_coe, finset.coe_to_finset],
exact le_refl _
end
lemma supr_range_std_basis [fintype ι] : (⨆i:ι, range (std_basis R φ i)) = ⊤ :=
have (set.univ : set ι) ⊆ ↑(finset.univ : finset ι) ∪ ∅ := by rw [finset.coe_univ, set.union_empty],
begin
apply top_unique,
convert (infi_ker_proj_le_supr_range_std_basis R φ this),
exact infi_emptyset.symm,
exact (funext $ λi, (@supr_pos _ _ _ (λh, range (std_basis R φ i)) $ finset.mem_univ i).symm)
end
lemma disjoint_std_basis_std_basis (I J : set ι) (h : disjoint I J) :
disjoint (⨆i∈I, range (std_basis R φ i)) (⨆i∈J, range (std_basis R φ i)) :=
begin
refine disjoint.mono
(supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj _ _ _ _ $ set.disjoint_compl I)
(supr_range_std_basis_le_infi_ker_proj _ _ _ _ $ set.disjoint_compl J) _,
simp only [disjoint, submodule.le_def', mem_infi, mem_inf, mem_ker, mem_bot, proj_apply,
funext_iff],
rintros b ⟨hI, hJ⟩ i,
classical,
by_cases hiI : i ∈ I,
{ by_cases hiJ : i ∈ J,
{ exact (h ⟨hiI, hiJ⟩).elim },
{ exact hJ i hiJ } },
{ exact hI i hiI }
end
lemma std_basis_eq_single {a : R} :
(λ (i : ι), (std_basis R (λ _ : ι, R) i) a) = λ (i : ι), (finsupp.single i a) :=
begin
ext i j,
rw [std_basis_apply, finsupp.single_apply],
split_ifs,
{ rw [h, function.update_same] },
{ rw [function.update_noteq (ne.symm h)], refl },
end
end
end pi
variables (R M)
instance automorphism_group : group (M ≃ₗ[R] M) :=
{ mul := λ f g, g.trans f,
one := linear_equiv.refl R M,
inv := λ f, f.symm,
mul_assoc := λ f g h, by {ext, refl},
mul_one := λ f, by {ext, refl},
one_mul := λ f, by {ext, refl},
mul_left_inv := λ f, by {ext, exact f.left_inv x} }
instance automorphism_group.to_linear_map_is_monoid_hom :
is_monoid_hom (linear_equiv.to_linear_map : (M ≃ₗ[R] M) → (M →ₗ[R] M)) :=
{ map_one := rfl,
map_mul := λ f g, rfl }
/-- The group of invertible linear maps from `M` to itself -/
def general_linear_group := units (M →ₗ[R] M)
namespace general_linear_group
variables {R M}
instance : group (general_linear_group R M) := by delta general_linear_group; apply_instance
instance : inhabited (general_linear_group R M) := ⟨1⟩
/-- An invertible linear map `f` determines an equivalence from `M` to itself. -/
def to_linear_equiv (f : general_linear_group R M) : (M ≃ₗ[R] M) :=
{ inv_fun := f.inv.to_fun,
left_inv := λ m, show (f.inv * f.val) m = m,
by erw f.inv_val; simp,
right_inv := λ m, show (f.val * f.inv) m = m,
by erw f.val_inv; simp,
..f.val }
/-- An equivalence from `M` to itself determines an invertible linear map. -/
def of_linear_equiv (f : (M ≃ₗ[R] M)) : general_linear_group R M :=
{ val := f,
inv := f.symm,
val_inv := linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.apply_symm_apply _,
inv_val := linear_map.ext $ λ _, f.symm_apply_apply _ }
variables (R M)
/-- The general linear group on `R` and `M` is multiplicatively equivalent to the type of linear
equivalences between `M` and itself. -/
def general_linear_equiv : general_linear_group R M ≃* (M ≃ₗ[R] M) :=
{ to_fun := to_linear_equiv,
inv_fun := of_linear_equiv,
left_inv := λ f,
begin
delta to_linear_equiv of_linear_equiv,
cases f with f f_inv, cases f, cases f_inv,
congr
end,
right_inv := λ f,
begin
delta to_linear_equiv of_linear_equiv,
cases f,
congr
end,
map_mul' := λ x y, by {ext, refl} }
@[simp] lemma general_linear_equiv_to_linear_map (f : general_linear_group R M) :
((general_linear_equiv R M).to_equiv f).to_linear_map = f.val :=
by {ext, refl}
end general_linear_group
end linear_map
|
06c3269dbabd7accff0aab0941b2869f58d51e4d | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Util/MonadBacktrack.lean | e9b1262e0d4a4e4c96ee41d1d367c66b4cdb0dfb | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,215 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
namespace Lean
/-- Similar to `MonadState`, but it retrieves/restores only the "backtrackable" part of the state -/
class MonadBacktrack (s : outParam Type) (m : Type → Type) where
saveState : m s
restoreState : s → m Unit
export MonadBacktrack (saveState restoreState)
/--
Execute `x?`, but backtrack state if result is `none` or an exception was thrown.
-/
def commitWhenSome? [Monad m] [MonadBacktrack s m] [MonadExcept ε m] (x? : m (Option α)) : m (Option α) := do
let s ← saveState
try
match (← x?) with
| some a => return some a
| none =>
restoreState s
return none
catch ex =>
restoreState s
throw ex
/--
Execute `x?`, but backtrack state if result is `none` or an exception was thrown.
If an exception is thrown, `none` is returned.
That is, this function is similar to `commitWhenSome?`, but swallows the exception and returns `none`.
-/
def commitWhenSomeNoEx? [Monad m] [MonadBacktrack s m] [MonadExcept ε m] (x? : m (Option α)) : m (Option α) :=
try
commitWhenSome? x?
catch _ =>
return none
def commitWhen [Monad m] [MonadBacktrack s m] [MonadExcept ε m] (x : m Bool) : m Bool := do
let s ← saveState
try
match (← x) with
| true => pure true
| false =>
restoreState s
pure false
catch ex =>
restoreState s
throw ex
def commitIfNoEx [Monad m] [MonadBacktrack s m] [MonadExcept ε m] (x : m α) : m α := do
let s ← saveState
try
x
catch ex =>
restoreState s
throw ex
def withoutModifyingState [Monad m] [MonadFinally m] [MonadBacktrack s m] (x : m α) : m α := do
let s ← saveState
try
x
finally
restoreState s
def observing? [Monad m] [MonadBacktrack s m] [MonadExcept ε m] (x : m α) : m (Option α) := do
let s ← saveState
try
x
catch _ =>
restoreState s
return none
instance [MonadBacktrack s m] [Monad m] : MonadBacktrack s (ExceptT ε m) where
saveState := ExceptT.lift saveState
restoreState s := ExceptT.lift <| restoreState s
end Lean
|
cf01c3a08852437d75c8de42a8227b0886f98a89 | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /tests/lean/run/class6.lean | 3b75c188e863495e114900bf211da5542c0b991f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 294 | lean | import logic data.prod
open prod
inductive t1 : Type :=
mk1 : t1
inductive t2 : Type :=
mk2 : t2
theorem inhabited_t1 : inhabited t1
:= inhabited.mk t1.mk1
theorem inhabited_t2 : inhabited t2
:= inhabited.mk t2.mk2
instance inhabited_t1 inhabited_t2
theorem T : inhabited (t1 × t2)
:= _
|
eb5512b139e5a4dd1fa72c033b31bfb8e22fae0b | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/set_theory/ordinal/arithmetic.lean | 2f30eb33d62a759d47a7692db2cb755b841ba806 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 95,991 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import set_theory.ordinal.basic
import tactic.by_contra
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limit_rec_on`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We also define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals, and discuss the properties
of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `is_limit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limit_rec_on` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `is_normal`: a function `f : ordinal → ordinal` satisfies `is_normal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
* `enum_ord`: enumerates an unbounded set of ordinals by the ordinals themselves.
* `sup`, `lsub`: the supremum / least strict upper bound of an indexed family of ordinals in
`Type u`, as an ordinal in `Type u`.
* `bsup`, `blsub`: the supremum / least strict upper bound of a set of ordinals indexed by ordinals
less than a given ordinal `o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `principal.lean` instead.
-/
noncomputable theory
open function cardinal set equiv order
open_locale classical cardinal ordinal
universes u v w
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
namespace ordinal
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp] theorem lift_add (a b) : lift (a + b) = lift a + lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(rel_iso.sum_lex_congr (rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_succ (a) : lift (succ a) = succ (lift a) :=
by { rw [←add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one], refl }
instance add_contravariant_class_le : contravariant_class ordinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (+) (≤) :=
⟨λ a b c, induction_on a $ λ α r hr, induction_on b $ λ β₁ s₁ hs₁, induction_on c $ λ β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩,
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (sum.inl a) = sum.inl a := λ a,
by simpa only [initial_seg.trans_apply, initial_seg.le_add_apply]
using @initial_seg.eq _ _ _ _ (@sum.lex.is_well_order _ _ _ _ hr hs₂)
((initial_seg.le_add r s₁).trans f) (initial_seg.le_add r s₂) a,
have ∀ b, {b' // f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr b'}, begin
intro b, cases e : f (sum.inr b),
{ rw ← fl at e, have := f.inj' e, contradiction },
{ exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ }
end,
let g (b) := (this b).1 in
have fr : ∀ b, f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr (g b), from λ b, (this b).2,
⟨⟨⟨g, λ x y h, by injection f.inj'
(by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (sum.inr x) = f (sum.inr y))⟩,
λ a b, by simpa only [sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, rel_embedding.coe_fn_to_embedding,
initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding, embedding.coe_fn_mk]
using @rel_embedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.to_rel_embedding (sum.inr a) (sum.inr b)⟩,
λ a b H, begin
rcases f.init' (by rw fr; exact sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a'|a', h⟩,
{ rw fl at h, cases h },
{ rw fr at h, exact ⟨a', sum.inr.inj h⟩ }
end⟩⟩⟩
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : ordinal) = 1 := zero_add 1
@[simp] theorem succ_one : succ (1 : ordinal) = 2 := rfl
theorem one_le_iff_pos {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ 0 < o :=
by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
by rw [one_le_iff_pos, ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem succ_pos (o : ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
(ordinal.zero_le o).trans_lt (lt_succ o)
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt $ succ_pos o
@[simp] theorem card_succ (o : ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 :=
by simp only [←add_one_eq_succ, card_add, card_one]
theorem nat_cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ↑n.succ = succ (n : ordinal) := rfl
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {a : ordinal} : a < 1 ↔ a = 0 :=
by rw [←succ_zero, lt_succ_iff, ordinal.le_zero]
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c :=
by rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariant_class_lt : covariant_class ordinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (+) (<) :=
⟨λ a b c, (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance add_contravariant_class_lt : contravariant_class ordinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (+) (<) :=
⟨λ a b c, (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance add_swap_contravariant_class_lt :
contravariant_class ordinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (swap (+)) (<) :=
⟨λ a b c, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, add_le_add_right h _)⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by rw [nat_cast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
/-! ### The zero ordinal -/
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {o} : card o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨induction_on o $ λ α r _ h, begin
refine le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt $
λ hn, mk_ne_zero_iff.2 _ h) (ordinal.zero_le _),
rw [← succ_le_iff, succ_zero] at hn, cases hn with f,
exact ⟨f punit.star⟩
end, λ e, by simp only [e, card_zero]⟩
protected lemma one_ne_zero : (1 : ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance : nontrivial ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ordinal) < 1 :=
lt_iff_le_and_ne.2 ⟨ordinal.zero_le _, ordinal.one_ne_zero.symm⟩
instance : zero_le_one_class ordinal := ⟨zero_lt_one.le⟩
instance unique_out_one : unique (1 : ordinal).out.α :=
{ default := enum (<) 0 (by simp),
uniq := λ a, begin
rw ←enum_typein (<) a,
unfold default,
congr,
rw ←lt_one_iff_zero,
apply typein_lt_self
end }
theorem one_out_eq (x : (1 : ordinal).out.α) : x = enum (<) 0 (by simp) :=
unique.eq_default x
@[simp] theorem typein_one_out (x : (1 : ordinal).out.α) : typein (<) x = 0 :=
by rw [one_out_eq x, typein_enum]
theorem le_one_iff {a : ordinal} : a ≤ 1 ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ ha, _, _⟩,
{ rcases eq_or_lt_of_le ha with rfl | ha,
exacts [or.inr rfl, or.inl (lt_one_iff_zero.1 ha)], },
{ rintro (rfl | rfl),
exacts [zero_le_one, le_rfl], }
end
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ (a = 0 ∧ b = 0) :=
induction_on a $ λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _, begin
simp_rw [←type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_is_empty],
exact is_empty_sum
end
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then classical.some h else o
@[simp] theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o :=
by have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective $ classical.some_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then let ⟨a, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e ⟨a, e'⟩, by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e,
λ h, dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e, ⟨_, e.symm⟩, λ ⟨a, e⟩, by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : ordinal} (h : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, λ l, lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) (λ e, h ⟨_, e.symm⟩)⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then let ⟨c, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp] theorem lift_is_succ {o} : (∃ a, lift o = succ a) ↔ (∃ a, o = succ a) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, h⟩,
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down $ show a ≤ lift o, from le_of_lt $
h.symm ▸ lt_succ a in
⟨b, lift_inj.1 $ by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨lift a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_pred (o) : lift (pred o) = pred (lift o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by cases h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h,
pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor. -/
def is_limit (o : ordinal) : Prop := o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
theorem not_zero_is_limit : ¬ is_limit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h rfl
theorem not_succ_is_limit (o) : ¬ is_limit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ := lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
theorem not_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ := not_succ_is_limit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_is_limit {o a : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
theorem le_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ succ_lt_of_is_limit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨λ h x l, l.le.trans h,
λ H, (le_succ_of_is_limit h).1 $ le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x :=
by simpa only [not_ball, not_le] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp] theorem lift_is_limit (o) : is_limit (lift o) ↔ is_limit o :=
and_congr (not_congr $ by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨λ H a h, lift_lt.1 $ by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h),
λ H a h, begin
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le,
rw [←lift_succ, lift_lt],
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)
end⟩
theorem is_limit.pos {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
theorem is_limit.one_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 1 < o :=
by simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
theorem is_limit.nat_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) < o
| 0 := h.pos
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (is_limit.nat_lt n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : ordinal) :
o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ is_limit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then or.inl o0 else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then or.inr (or.inl h) else
or.inr $ or.inr ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def limit_rec_on {C : ordinal → Sort*}
(o : ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, is_limit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
lt_wf.fix (λ o IH,
if o0 : o = 0 then by rw o0; exact H₁ else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by rw ← succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h; exact
H₂ _ (IH _ $ pred_lt_iff_is_succ.2 h)
else H₃ _ ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩ IH) o
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limit_rec_on C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, lt_wf.fix_eq, dif_pos rfl]; refl
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limit_rec_on C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
begin
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩,
rw [limit_rec_on, lt_wf.fix_eq, dif_neg (succ_ne_zero o), dif_pos h],
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_2 (succ o) h = h₂,
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_3 (succ o) h = h₃,
revert h₂ h₃, generalize e : pred (succ o) = o', intros,
rw pred_succ at e, subst o', refl
end
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h (λ x h, @limit_rec_on C x H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, lt_wf.fix_eq, dif_neg h.1, dif_neg (not_succ_of_is_limit h)]; refl
instance order_top_out_succ (o : ordinal) : order_top (succ o).out.α :=
⟨_, le_enum_succ⟩
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : ordinal} :
enum (<) o (by { rw type_lt, exact lt_succ o }) = (⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
lemma has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : is_well_order α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y :=
begin
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x)),
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x) _).mpr (lt_succ _), rw [enum_typein]
end
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : no_max_order o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa type_lt)⟩
lemma bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [is_well_order α r] (hr : (type r).is_limit) (x) :
bounded r {x} :=
begin
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), _⟩,
intros b hb,
rw mem_singleton_iff.1 hb,
nth_rewrite 0 ←enum_typein r x,
rw @enum_lt_enum _ r,
apply lt_succ
end
lemma type_subrel_lt (o : ordinal.{u}) :
type (subrel (<) {o' : ordinal | o' < o}) = ordinal.lift.{u+1} o :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on o _,
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩, resetI, apply quotient.sound,
constructor, symmetry, refine (rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans (enum_iso r).symm
end
lemma mk_initial_seg (o : ordinal.{u}) :
#{o' : ordinal | o' < o} = cardinal.lift.{u+1} o.card :=
by rw [lift_card, ←type_subrel_lt, card_type]
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def is_normal (f : ordinal → ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, is_limit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem is_normal.limit_le {f} (H : is_normal f) : ∀ {o}, is_limit o →
∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a := H.2
theorem is_normal.limit_lt {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem is_normal.strict_mono {f} (H : is_normal f) : strict_mono f :=
λ a b, limit_rec_on b (not.elim (not_lt_of_le $ ordinal.zero_le _))
(λ b IH h, (lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim
(λ h, (IH h).trans (H.1 _))
(λ e, e ▸ H.1 _))
(λ b l IH h, lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a)
((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h)))
theorem is_normal.monotone {f} (H : is_normal f) : monotone f :=
H.strict_mono.monotone
theorem is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit (f : ordinal → ordinal) :
is_normal f ↔ (strict_mono f ∧ ∀ o, is_limit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a) :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨hf.strict_mono, λ a ha c, (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, λ ⟨hs, hl⟩, ⟨λ a, hs (lt_succ a),
λ a ha c, ⟨λ hac b hba, ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem is_normal.lt_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt $ H.strict_mono
theorem is_normal.le_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem is_normal.inj {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem is_normal.self_le {f} (H : is_normal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strict_mono H.strict_mono a
theorem is_normal.le_set {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : set ordinal) (p0 : p.nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) {o : ordinal} : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨λ h a pa, (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h,
λ h, begin
revert H₂, refine limit_rec_on b (λ H₂, _) (λ S _ H₂, _) (λ S L _ H₂, (H.2 _ L _).2 (λ a h', _)),
{ cases p0 with x px,
have := ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (ordinal.zero_le _) _ px),
rw this at px, exact h _ px },
{ rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 $ (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact (H.le_iff.2 $ succ_le_of_lt $ not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁) },
{ rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact (H.le_iff.2 $ (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁) }
end⟩
theorem is_normal.le_set' {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : set α) (g : α → ordinal) (p0 : p.nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) {o} : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o :=
(H.le_set (λ x, ∃ y, p y ∧ x = g y)
(let ⟨x, px⟩ := p0 in ⟨_, _, px, rfl⟩) _
(λ o, (H₂ o).trans ⟨λ H a ⟨y, h1, h2⟩, h2.symm ▸ H y h1,
λ H a h1, H (g a) ⟨a, h1, rfl⟩⟩)).trans
⟨λ H a h, H (g a) ⟨a, h, rfl⟩, λ H a ⟨y, h1, h2⟩, h2.symm ▸ H y h1⟩
theorem is_normal.refl : is_normal id :=
⟨lt_succ, λ o l a, limit_le l⟩
theorem is_normal.trans {f g} (H₁ : is_normal f) (H₂ : is_normal g) :
is_normal (λ x, f (g x)) :=
⟨λ x, H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _),
λ o l a, H₁.le_set' (< o) g ⟨_, l.pos⟩ _ (λ c, H₂.2 _ l _)⟩
theorem is_normal.is_limit {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (l : is_limit o) :
is_limit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ (ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt $ H.lt_iff.2 l.pos,
λ a h, let ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h in
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
theorem is_normal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : is_normal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (h : is_limit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $
induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _ h H l, begin
resetI,
suffices : ∀ x : β, sum.lex r s (sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with x x,
{ cases this (enum s 0 h.pos) },
{ exact irrefl _ (this _) } },
intros x,
rw [←typein_lt_typein (sum.lex r s), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x)),
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this,
refine (type_le'.2 ⟨rel_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _)⟩).trans_lt this,
{ rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩,
{ exact sum.inl a },
{ exact sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩ } },
{ rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩; rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩; cases h₁; cases h₂;
rintro ⟨⟩; constructor; assumption }
end) h H⟩
theorem add_is_normal (a : ordinal) : is_normal ((+) a) :=
⟨λ b, (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b),
λ b l c, add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem add_is_limit (a) {b} : is_limit b → is_limit (a + b) :=
(add_is_normal a).is_limit
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals-/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : ordinal} : {o | a ≤ b + o}.nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance : has_sub ordinal := ⟨λ a b, Inf {o | a ≤ b + o}⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
Inf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨λ h, (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), λ h, cInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 $ le_rfl)
((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 $ le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 $ le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm' begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a-b) with e|⟨c,e⟩|l,
{ simp only [e, add_zero, h] },
{ rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e], exact lt_succ c },
{ exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 (λ c l, (lt_sub.1 l).le) }
end
instance : has_exists_add_of_le ordinal :=
⟨λ a b h, ⟨_, (ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem sub_zero (a : ordinal) : a - 0 = a :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp] theorem zero_sub (a : ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 :=
by rw ← ordinal.le_zero; apply sub_le_self
@[simp] theorem sub_self (a : ordinal) : a - a = 0 :=
by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b,
λ h, by rwa [← ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
theorem sub_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d, by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c :=
by rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem sub_is_limit {a b} (l : is_limit a) (h : b < a) : is_limit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ lt_sub.2 $ by rwa add_zero,
λ c h, by rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
@[simp] theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_add_left _ _),
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex],
refine ⟨rel_embedding.collapse (rel_embedding.of_monotone _ _)⟩,
{ apply sum.rec, exact λ _, 0, exact nat.succ },
{ intros a b, cases a; cases b; intro H; cases H with _ _ H _ _ H;
[cases H, exact nat.succ_pos _, exact nat.succ_lt_succ H] }
end
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
by rw [← ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals-/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance : monoid ordinal.{u} :=
{ mul := λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂ a b
(λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, ⟦⟨β × α, prod.lex s r, by exactI prod.lex.is_well_order⟩⟧
: Well_order → Well_order → ordinal) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
quot.sound ⟨rel_iso.prod_lex_congr g f⟩,
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
eq.symm $ quotient.sound ⟨⟨prod_assoc _ _ _, λ a b, begin
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩,
simp [prod.lex_def, and_or_distrib_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]
end⟩⟩,
mul_one := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, quotient.sound
⟨⟨punit_prod _, λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩;
simp only [prod.lex_def, empty_relation, false_or];
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]; refl⟩⟩,
one_mul := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, quotient.sound
⟨⟨prod_punit _, λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩;
simp only [prod.lex_def, empty_relation, and_false, or_false]; refl⟩⟩ }
@[simp] theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type (prod.lex s r) = type r * type s := rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α _ _, induction_on b $ λ β _ _, begin
simp_rw [←type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_is_empty],
rw or_comm,
exact is_empty_prod
end
instance : monoid_with_zero ordinal :=
{ zero := 0,
mul_zero := λ a, mul_eq_zero'.2 $ or.inr rfl,
zero_mul := λ a, mul_eq_zero'.2 $ or.inl rfl,
..ordinal.monoid }
instance : no_zero_divisors ordinal :=
⟨λ a b, mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_mul (a b) : lift (a * b) = lift a * lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(rel_iso.prod_lex_congr (rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
mul_comm (mk β) (mk α)
instance : left_distrib_class ordinal.{u} :=
⟨λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨⟨sum_prod_distrib _ _ _, begin
rintro ⟨a₁|a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁|b₁, b₂⟩;
simp only [prod.lex_def,
sum.lex_inl_inl, sum.lex.sep, sum.lex_inr_inl, sum.lex_inr_inr,
sum_prod_distrib_apply_left, sum_prod_distrib_apply_right];
simp only [sum.inl.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]
end⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a := mul_add_one a b
instance mul_covariant_class_le : covariant_class ordinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (*) (≤) :=
⟨λ c a b, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨rel_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (f a.1, a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩, clear_,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ (f.to_rel_embedding.map_rel_iff.2 h') },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ h' }
end⟩
instance mul_swap_covariant_class_le : covariant_class ordinal.{u} ordinal.{u} (swap (*)) (≤) :=
⟨λ c a b, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨rel_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (a.1, f a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ h' },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ (f.to_rel_embedding.map_rel_iff.2 h') }
end⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : ordinal) {b : ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b :=
by { convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a, rw mul_one a }
theorem le_mul_right (a : ordinal) {b : ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a :=
by { convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a, rw one_mul a }
private lemma mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s]
{c} (h : is_limit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c)
(l : c < type r * type s) : false :=
begin
suffices : ∀ a b, prod.lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with b a, exact irrefl _ (this _ _) },
intros a b,
rw [←typein_lt_typein (prod.lex s r), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b)),
rw mul_succ at this,
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this,
refine (type_le'.2 _).trans_lt this,
constructor,
refine rel_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _),
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩,
by_cases e : b = b',
{ refine sum.inr ⟨a', _⟩,
subst e, cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact (irrefl _ h).elim },
{ exact h } },
{ refine sum.inl (⟨b', _⟩, a'),
cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact h }, { exact (e rfl).elim } } },
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩,
intro h, by_cases e₁ : b = b₁; by_cases e₂ : b = b₂,
{ substs b₁ b₂,
simpa only [subrel_val, prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or, eq_self_iff_true,
dif_pos, sum.lex_inr_inr] using h },
{ subst b₁,
simp only [subrel_val, prod.lex_def, e₂, prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢,
cases h₂; [exact asymm h h₂_h, exact e₂ rfl] },
{ simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁, by cc] },
{ simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, prod.lex_def, subrel_val, subtype.mk_eq_mk,
sum.lex_inl_inl] using h } }
end
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (h : is_limit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $ induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _,
by exactI mul_le_of_limit_aux) h H⟩
theorem mul_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : is_normal ((*) a) :=
⟨λ b, by rw mul_succ; simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a*b)).2 h,
λ b l c, mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : ordinal}
(h : is_limit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' :=
by simpa only [not_ball, not_le] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b :=
by simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (λ h', mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).inj
theorem mul_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a0 : 0 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a * b) :=
(mul_is_normal a0).is_limit
theorem mul_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : is_limit (a * b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with rfl|⟨b,rfl⟩|lb,
{ exact b0.false.elim },
{ rw mul_succ, exact add_is_limit _ l },
{ exact mul_is_limit l.pos lb }
end
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0 a := by rw [zero_smul, nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| (n + 1) a := by rw [succ_nsmul', nat.cast_add, mul_add, nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul]
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
theorem div_nonempty {a b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : {o | a < b * succ o}.nonempty :=
⟨a, succ_le_iff.1 $
by simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul]
using mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance : has_div ordinal := ⟨λ a b, if h : b = 0 then 0 else Inf {o | a < b * succ o}⟩
@[simp] theorem div_zero (a : ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
lemma div_def (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = Inf {o | a < b * succ o} :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) :=
by rw div_def a h; exact Inf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b :=
by simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨λ h, (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _),
λ h, by rw div_def a b0; exact cInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, div_le c0, not_lt]
theorem le_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) :
a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a,
{ simp only [mul_zero, ordinal.zero_le] },
{ intros, rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0] },
{ simp only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt} }
end
theorem div_lt {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) :
a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, ordinal.zero_le] else
(div_le b0).2 $ h.trans_lt $ mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp] theorem zero_div (a : ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
ordinal.le_zero.1 $ div_le_of_le_mul $ ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply (div_le b0).2,
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left],
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0 },
{ rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left],
apply mul_div_le }
end
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
begin
rw [←ordinal.le_zero, div_le $ ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ (ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h],
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
end
@[simp] theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a :=
by simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
@[simp] theorem div_one (a : ordinal) : a / 1 = a :=
by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem div_self {a : ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self] else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d,
by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem is_limit_add_iff {a b} : is_limit (a + b) ↔ is_limit b ∨ (b = 0 ∧ is_limit a) :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ by_cases h' : b = 0,
{ rw [h', add_zero] at h, right, exact ⟨h', h⟩ },
left, rw [←add_sub_cancel a b], apply sub_is_limit h,
suffices : a + 0 < a + b, simpa only [add_zero],
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] },
rcases h with h|⟨rfl, h⟩, exact add_is_limit a h, simpa only [add_zero]
end
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a _ c ⟨b, rfl⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨d, e⟩, ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩,
λ ⟨d, e⟩, by { rw [e, ← mul_add], apply dvd_mul_right }⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a _ a0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a _ b0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 (λ h : b = 0, by simpa only [h, mul_zero] using b0)) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂ else
(le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance : is_antisymm ordinal (∣) := ⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance : has_mod ordinal := ⟨λ a b, a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mod_zero (a : ordinal) : a % 0 = a :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 :=
by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le $ mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 $
by rw div_add_mod; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp] theorem mod_self (a : ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod] else
by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp] theorem mod_one (a : ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 :=
begin
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩,
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb,
{ simp },
{ simp [mod_def, hb] }
end
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
/-! ### Families of ordinals
There are two kinds of indexed families that naturally arise when dealing with ordinals: those
indexed by some type in the appropriate universe, and those indexed by ordinals less than another.
The following API allows one to convert from one kind of family to the other.
In many cases, this makes it easy to prove claims about one kind of family via the corresponding
claim on the other. -/
/-- Converts a family indexed by a `Type u` to one indexed by an `ordinal.{u}` using a specified
well-ordering. -/
def bfamily_of_family' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] (f : ι → α) :
Π a < type r, α :=
λ a ha, f (enum r a ha)
/-- Converts a family indexed by a `Type u` to one indexed by an `ordinal.{u}` using a well-ordering
given by the axiom of choice. -/
def bfamily_of_family {ι : Type u} : (ι → α) → Π a < type (@well_ordering_rel ι), α :=
bfamily_of_family' well_ordering_rel
/-- Converts a family indexed by an `ordinal.{u}` to one indexed by an `Type u` using a specified
well-ordering. -/
def family_of_bfamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o)
(f : Π a < o, α) : ι → α :=
λ i, f (typein r i) (by { rw ←ho, exact typein_lt_type r i })
/-- Converts a family indexed by an `ordinal.{u}` to one indexed by a `Type u` using a well-ordering
given by the axiom of choice. -/
def family_of_bfamily (o : ordinal) (f : Π a < o, α) : o.out.α → α :=
family_of_bfamily' (<) (type_lt o) f
@[simp] theorem bfamily_of_family'_typein {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] (f : ι → α)
(i) : bfamily_of_family' r f (typein r i) (typein_lt_type r i) = f i :=
by simp only [bfamily_of_family', enum_typein]
@[simp] theorem bfamily_of_family_typein {ι} (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamily_of_family f (typein _ i) (typein_lt_type _ i) = f i :=
bfamily_of_family'_typein _ f i
@[simp] theorem family_of_bfamily'_enum {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : Π a < o, α) (i hi) :
family_of_bfamily' r ho f (enum r i (by rwa ho)) = f i hi :=
by simp only [family_of_bfamily', typein_enum]
@[simp] theorem family_of_bfamily_enum (o : ordinal) (f : Π a < o, α) (i hi) :
family_of_bfamily o f (enum (<) i (by { convert hi, exact type_lt _ })) = f i hi :=
family_of_bfamily'_enum _ (type_lt o) f _ _
/-- The range of a family indexed by ordinals. -/
def brange (o : ordinal) (f : Π a < o, α) : set α :=
{a | ∃ i hi, f i hi = a}
theorem mem_brange {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, α} {a} : a ∈ brange o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = a :=
iff.rfl
theorem mem_brange_self {o} (f : Π a < o, α) (i hi) : f i hi ∈ brange o f :=
⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem range_family_of_bfamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : Π a < o, α) : range (family_of_bfamily' r ho f) = brange o f :=
begin
refine set.ext (λ a, ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩,
apply mem_brange_self },
{ rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, family_of_bfamily'_enum _ _ _ _ _⟩ }
end
@[simp] theorem range_family_of_bfamily {o} (f : Π a < o, α) :
range (family_of_bfamily o f) = brange o f :=
range_family_of_bfamily' _ _ f
@[simp] theorem brange_bfamily_of_family' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r]
(f : ι → α) : brange _ (bfamily_of_family' r f) = range f :=
begin
refine set.ext (λ a, ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩,
apply mem_range_self },
{ rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, _, bfamily_of_family'_typein _ _ _⟩ },
end
@[simp] theorem brange_bfamily_of_family {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) :
brange _ (bfamily_of_family f) = range f :=
brange_bfamily_of_family' _ _
@[simp] theorem brange_const {o : ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) {c : α} : brange o (λ _ _, c) = {c} :=
begin
rw ←range_family_of_bfamily,
exact @set.range_const _ o.out.α (out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.2 ho) c
end
theorem comp_bfamily_of_family' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] (f : ι → α)
(g : α → β) : (λ i hi, g (bfamily_of_family' r f i hi)) = bfamily_of_family' r (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
theorem comp_bfamily_of_family {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) (g : α → β) :
(λ i hi, g (bfamily_of_family f i hi)) = bfamily_of_family (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
theorem comp_family_of_bfamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : Π a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ (family_of_bfamily' r ho f) = family_of_bfamily' r ho (λ i hi, g (f i hi)) :=
rfl
theorem comp_family_of_bfamily {o} (f : Π a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ (family_of_bfamily o f) = family_of_bfamily o (λ i hi, g (f i hi)) :=
rfl
/-! ### Supremum of a family of ordinals -/
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals -/
def sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → ordinal.{max u v}) : ordinal.{max u v} :=
supr f
@[simp] theorem Sup_eq_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → ordinal.{max u v}) : Sup (set.range f) = sup f :=
rfl
/-- The range of an indexed ordinal function, whose outputs live in a higher universe than the
inputs, is always bounded above. See `ordinal.lsub` for an explicit bound. -/
theorem bdd_above_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → ordinal.{max u v}) : bdd_above (set.range f) :=
⟨(supr (succ ∘ card ∘ f)).ord, begin
rintros a ⟨i, rfl⟩,
exact le_of_lt (cardinal.lt_ord.2 ((lt_succ _).trans_le (le_csupr (bdd_above_range _) _)))
end⟩
theorem le_sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ∀ i, f i ≤ sup f :=
λ i, le_cSup (bdd_above_range f) (mem_range_self i)
theorem sup_le_iff {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(cSup_le_iff' (bdd_above_range f)).trans (by simp)
theorem sup_le {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : (∀ i, f i ≤ a) → sup f ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.2
theorem lt_sup {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : a < sup f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i :=
by simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@sup_le_iff _ f a)
theorem ne_sup_iff_lt_sup {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} : (∀ i, f i ≠ sup f) ↔ ∀ i, f i < sup f :=
⟨λ hf _, lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf _), λ hf _, ne_of_lt (hf _)⟩
theorem sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ sup f) {a}
(hao : a < sup f) : succ a < sup f :=
begin
by_contra' hoa,
exact hao.not_le (sup_le $ λ i, le_of_lt_succ $
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf i)).trans_le hoa)
end
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_zero_iff {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} : sup f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h i, _, λ h, le_antisymm
(sup_le (λ i, ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i))) (ordinal.zero_le _)⟩,
rw [←ordinal.le_zero, ←h],
exact le_sup f i
end
theorem is_normal.sup {f} (H : is_normal f) {ι} (g : ι → ordinal) (h : nonempty ι) :
f (sup g) = sup (f ∘ g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a,
by rw [sup_le_iff, comp, H.le_set' (λ_:ι, true) g (let ⟨i⟩ := h in ⟨i, ⟨⟩⟩)];
intros; simp only [sup_le_iff, true_implies_iff]; tauto
@[simp] theorem sup_empty {ι} [is_empty ι] (f : ι → ordinal) : sup f = 0 :=
csupr_of_empty f
@[simp] theorem sup_const {ι} [hι : nonempty ι] (o : ordinal) : sup (λ _ : ι, o) = o :=
csupr_const
@[simp] theorem sup_unique {ι} [unique ι] (f : ι → ordinal) : sup f = f default :=
supr_unique
theorem sup_le_of_range_subset {ι ι'} {f : ι → ordinal} {g : ι' → ordinal}
(h : set.range f ⊆ set.range g) : sup.{u (max v w)} f ≤ sup.{v (max u w)} g :=
sup_le $ λ i, match h (mem_range_self i) with ⟨j, hj⟩ := hj ▸ le_sup _ _ end
theorem sup_eq_of_range_eq {ι ι'} {f : ι → ordinal} {g : ι' → ordinal}
(h : set.range f = set.range g) : sup.{u (max v w)} f = sup.{v (max u w)} g :=
(sup_le_of_range_subset h.le).antisymm (sup_le_of_range_subset.{v u w} h.ge)
lemma unbounded_range_of_sup_ge {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f : β → α)
(h : type r ≤ sup.{u u} (typein r ∘ f)) : unbounded r (range f) :=
(not_bounded_iff _).1 $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, not_lt_of_le h $ lt_of_le_of_lt
(sup_le $ λ y, le_of_lt $ (typein_lt_typein r).2 $ hx _ $ mem_range_self y)
(typein_lt_type r x)
theorem le_sup_shrink_equiv {s : set ordinal.{u}} (hs : small.{u} s) (a) (ha : a ∈ s) :
a ≤ sup.{u u} (λ x, ((@equiv_shrink s hs).symm x).val) :=
by { convert le_sup.{u u} _ ((@equiv_shrink s hs) ⟨a, ha⟩), rw symm_apply_apply }
theorem small_Iio (o : ordinal.{u}) : small.{u} (set.Iio o) :=
let f : o.out.α → set.Iio o := λ x, ⟨typein (<) x, typein_lt_self x⟩ in
let hf : surjective f := λ b, ⟨enum (<) b.val (by { rw type_lt, exact b.prop }),
subtype.ext (typein_enum _ _)⟩ in
small_of_surjective hf
theorem bdd_above_iff_small {s : set ordinal.{u}} : bdd_above s ↔ small.{u} s :=
⟨λ ⟨a, h⟩, @small_subset _ _ _ (by exact λ b hb, lt_succ_iff.2 (h hb)) (small_Iio (succ a)),
λ h, ⟨sup.{u u} (λ x, ((@equiv_shrink s h).symm x).val), le_sup_shrink_equiv h⟩⟩
theorem sup_eq_Sup {s : set ordinal.{u}} (hs : small.{u} s) :
sup.{u u} (λ x, (@equiv_shrink s hs).symm x) = Sup s :=
let hs' := bdd_above_iff_small.2 hs in
((cSup_le_iff' hs').2 (le_sup_shrink_equiv hs)).antisymm'
(sup_le (λ x, le_cSup hs' (subtype.mem _)))
theorem Sup_ord {s : set cardinal.{u}} (hs : bdd_above s) : (Sup s).ord = Sup (ord '' s) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a, begin
rw [cSup_le_iff' (bdd_above_iff_small.2 (@small_image _ _ _ s
(cardinal.bdd_above_iff_small.1 hs))), ord_le, cSup_le_iff' hs],
simp [ord_le]
end
theorem supr_ord {ι} {f : ι → cardinal} (hf : bdd_above (range f)) :
(supr f).ord = ⨆ i, (f i).ord :=
by { unfold supr, convert Sup_ord hf, rw range_comp }
private theorem sup_le_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop)
[is_well_order ι r] [is_well_order ι' r'] {o} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : Π a < o, ordinal) : sup (family_of_bfamily' r ho f) ≤ sup (family_of_bfamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_le $ λ i, begin
cases typein_surj r' (by { rw [ho', ←ho], exact typein_lt_type r i }) with j hj,
simp_rw [family_of_bfamily', ←hj],
apply le_sup
end
theorem sup_eq_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop) [is_well_order ι r]
[is_well_order ι' r'] {o : ordinal.{u}} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : Π a < o, ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup (family_of_bfamily' r ho f) = sup (family_of_bfamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_eq_of_range_eq.{u u v} (by simp)
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals indexed by the set of ordinals less than some
`o : ordinal.{u}`. This is a special case of `sup` over the family provided by
`family_of_bfamily`. -/
def bsup (o : ordinal.{u}) (f : Π a < o, ordinal.{max u v}) : ordinal.{max u v} :=
sup (family_of_bfamily o f)
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : sup (family_of_bfamily o f) = bsup o f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_bsup' {o ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] (ho : type r = o) (f) :
sup (family_of_bfamily' r ho f) = bsup o f :=
sup_eq_sup r _ ho _ f
@[simp] theorem Sup_eq_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : Sup (brange o f) = bsup o f :=
by { congr, rw range_family_of_bfamily }
@[simp] theorem bsup_eq_sup' {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] (f : ι → ordinal) :
bsup _ (bfamily_of_family' r f) = sup f :=
by simp only [←sup_eq_bsup' r, enum_typein, family_of_bfamily', bfamily_of_family']
theorem bsup_eq_bsup {ι : Type u} (r r' : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] [is_well_order ι r']
(f : ι → ordinal) : bsup _ (bfamily_of_family' r f) = bsup _ (bfamily_of_family' r' f) :=
by rw [bsup_eq_sup', bsup_eq_sup']
@[simp] theorem bsup_eq_sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : bsup _ (bfamily_of_family f) = sup f :=
bsup_eq_sup' _ f
@[congr] lemma bsup_congr {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} (f : Π a < o₁, ordinal) (ho : o₁ = o₂) :
bsup o₁ f = bsup o₂ (λ a h, f a (h.trans_eq ho.symm)) :=
by subst ho
theorem bsup_le_iff {o f a} : bsup.{u v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.trans ⟨λ h i hi, by { rw ←family_of_bfamily_enum o f, exact h _ }, λ h i, h _ _⟩
theorem bsup_le {o : ordinal} {f : Π b < o, ordinal} {a} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≤ a) → bsup.{u v} o f ≤ a :=
bsup_le_iff.2
theorem le_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) (i h) : f i h ≤ bsup o f :=
bsup_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ _
theorem lt_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) {a} : a < bsup o f ↔ ∃ i hi, a < f i hi :=
by simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@bsup_le_iff _ f a)
theorem is_normal.bsup {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} :
∀ (g : Π a < o, ordinal) (h : o ≠ 0), f (bsup o g) = bsup o (λ a h, f (g a h)) :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _ g h,
by { resetI, rw [←sup_eq_bsup' r, H.sup _ (type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h), ←sup_eq_bsup' r]; refl }
theorem lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≠ o.bsup f) ↔ ∀ i h, f i h < o.bsup f :=
⟨λ hf _ _, lt_of_le_of_ne (le_bsup _ _ _) (hf _ _), λ hf _ _, ne_of_lt (hf _ _)⟩
theorem bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup {o} {f : Π a < o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i : ordinal} (h : i < o), f i h ≠ o.bsup f) (a) :
a < bsup o f → succ a < bsup o f :=
by { rw ←sup_eq_bsup at *, exact sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup (λ i, hf _) }
@[simp] theorem bsup_eq_zero_iff {o} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} : bsup o f = 0 ↔ ∀ i hi, f i hi = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h i hi, _, λ h, le_antisymm
(bsup_le (λ i hi, ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i hi))) (ordinal.zero_le _)⟩,
rw [←ordinal.le_zero, ←h],
exact le_bsup f i hi,
end
theorem lt_bsup_of_limit {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {a a'} (ha : a < o) (ha' : a' < o), a < a' → f a ha < f a' ha')
(ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) (i h) : f i h < bsup o f :=
(hf _ _ $ lt_succ i).trans_le (le_bsup f (succ i) $ ho _ h)
theorem bsup_succ_of_mono {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < succ o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i j} hi hj, i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) : bsup _ f = f o (lt_succ o) :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le $ λ i hi, hf _ _ $ le_of_lt_succ hi) (le_bsup _ _ _)
@[simp] theorem bsup_zero (f : Π a < (0 : ordinal), ordinal) : bsup 0 f = 0 :=
bsup_eq_zero_iff.2 (λ i hi, (ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim)
theorem bsup_const {o : ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) (a : ordinal) : bsup o (λ _ _, a) = a :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le (λ _ _, le_rfl)) (le_bsup _ 0 (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho))
@[simp] theorem bsup_one (f : Π a < (1 : ordinal), ordinal) : bsup 1 f = f 0 zero_lt_one :=
by simp_rw [←sup_eq_bsup, sup_unique, family_of_bfamily, family_of_bfamily', typein_one_out]
theorem bsup_le_of_brange_subset {o o'} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} {g : Π a < o', ordinal}
(h : brange o f ⊆ brange o' g) : bsup.{u (max v w)} o f ≤ bsup.{v (max u w)} o' g :=
bsup_le $ λ i hi, begin
obtain ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩ := h ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩,
rw ←hj',
apply le_bsup
end
theorem bsup_eq_of_brange_eq {o o'} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} {g : Π a < o', ordinal}
(h : brange o f = brange o' g) : bsup.{u (max v w)} o f = bsup.{v (max u w)} o' g :=
(bsup_le_of_brange_subset h.le).antisymm (bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{v u w} h.ge)
/-- The least strict upper bound of a family of ordinals. -/
def lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ordinal := sup (succ ∘ f)
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : sup (succ ∘ f) = lsub f := rfl
theorem lsub_le_iff {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : lsub f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i < a :=
by { convert sup_le_iff, simp only [succ_le_iff] }
theorem lsub_le {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : (∀ i, f i < a) → lsub f ≤ a :=
lsub_le_iff.2
theorem lt_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) (i) : f i < lsub f :=
succ_le_iff.1 (le_sup _ i)
theorem lt_lsub_iff {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : a < lsub f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i :=
by simpa only [not_forall, not_lt, not_le] using not_congr (@lsub_le_iff _ f a)
theorem sup_le_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : sup f ≤ lsub f :=
sup_le $ λ i, (lt_lsub f i).le
theorem lsub_le_sup_succ {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : lsub f ≤ succ (sup f) :=
lsub_le $ λ i, lt_succ_iff.2 (le_sup f i)
theorem sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) :
sup f = lsub f ∨ succ (sup f) = lsub f :=
begin
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (sup_le_lsub f),
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ((succ_le_of_lt h).antisymm (lsub_le_sup_succ f)) }
end
theorem sup_succ_le_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : succ (sup f) ≤ lsub f ↔ ∃ i, f i = sup f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ by_contra' hf,
exact (succ_le_iff.1 h).ne ((sup_le_lsub f).antisymm
(lsub_le (ne_sup_iff_lt_sup.1 hf))) },
rintro ⟨_, hf⟩,
rw [succ_le_iff, ←hf],
exact lt_lsub _ _
end
theorem sup_succ_eq_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : succ (sup f) = lsub f ↔ ∃ i, f i = sup f :=
(lsub_le_sup_succ f).le_iff_eq.symm.trans (sup_succ_le_lsub f)
theorem sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) :
sup f = lsub f ↔ ∀ a < lsub f, succ a < lsub f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ hf, le_antisymm (sup_le_lsub f) (lsub_le (λ i, _))⟩,
{ rw ←h,
exact λ a, sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup (λ i, (lsub_le_iff.1 (le_of_eq h.symm) i).ne) },
by_contra' hle,
have heq := (sup_succ_eq_lsub f).2 ⟨i, le_antisymm (le_sup _ _) hle⟩,
have := hf _ (by { rw ←heq, exact lt_succ (sup f) }),
rw heq at this,
exact this.false
end
theorem sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : sup f = lsub f ↔ ∀ i, f i < sup f :=
⟨λ h i, (by { rw h, apply lt_lsub }), λ h, le_antisymm (sup_le_lsub f) (lsub_le h)⟩
@[simp] lemma lsub_empty {ι} [h : is_empty ι] (f : ι → ordinal) : lsub f = 0 :=
by { rw [←ordinal.le_zero, lsub_le_iff], exact h.elim }
lemma lsub_pos {ι} [h : nonempty ι] (f : ι → ordinal) : 0 < lsub f :=
h.elim $ λ i, (ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt (lt_lsub f i)
@[simp] theorem lsub_eq_zero_iff {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} : lsub f = 0 ↔ is_empty ι :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨λ i, _⟩, λ h, @lsub_empty _ h _⟩,
have := @lsub_pos _ ⟨i⟩ f,
rw h at this,
exact this.false
end
@[simp] theorem lsub_const {ι} [hι : nonempty ι] (o : ordinal) : lsub (λ _ : ι, o) = succ o :=
sup_const (succ o)
@[simp] theorem lsub_unique {ι} [hι : unique ι] (f : ι → ordinal) : lsub f = succ (f default) :=
sup_unique _
theorem lsub_le_of_range_subset {ι ι'} {f : ι → ordinal} {g : ι' → ordinal}
(h : set.range f ⊆ set.range g) : lsub.{u (max v w)} f ≤ lsub.{v (max u w)} g :=
sup_le_of_range_subset (by convert set.image_subset _ h; apply set.range_comp)
theorem lsub_eq_of_range_eq {ι ι'} {f : ι → ordinal} {g : ι' → ordinal}
(h : set.range f = set.range g) : lsub.{u (max v w)} f = lsub.{v (max u w)} g :=
(lsub_le_of_range_subset h.le).antisymm (lsub_le_of_range_subset.{v u w} h.ge)
theorem lsub_not_mem_range {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : lsub f ∉ set.range f :=
λ ⟨i, h⟩, h.not_lt (lt_lsub f i)
theorem nonempty_compl_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → ordinal.{max u v}) : (set.range f)ᶜ.nonempty :=
⟨_, lsub_not_mem_range f⟩
@[simp] theorem lsub_typein (o : ordinal) :
lsub.{u u} (typein ((<) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop)) = o :=
(lsub_le.{u u} typein_lt_self).antisymm begin
by_contra' h,
nth_rewrite 0 ←type_lt o at h,
simpa [typein_enum] using lt_lsub.{u u} (typein (<)) (enum (<) _ h)
end
theorem sup_typein_limit {o : ordinal} (ho : ∀ a, a < o → succ a < o) :
sup.{u u} (typein ((<) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop)) = o :=
by rw (sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ.{u u} (typein (<))).2; rwa lsub_typein o
@[simp] theorem sup_typein_succ {o : ordinal} :
sup.{u u} (typein ((<) : (succ o).out.α → (succ o).out.α → Prop)) = o :=
begin
cases sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub.{u u}
(typein ((<) : (succ o).out.α → (succ o).out.α → Prop)) with h h,
{ rw sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ at h,
simp only [lsub_typein] at h,
exact (h o (lt_succ o)).false.elim },
rw [←succ_eq_succ_iff, h],
apply lsub_typein
end
/-- The least strict upper bound of a family of ordinals indexed by the set of ordinals less than
some `o : ordinal.{u}`.
This is to `lsub` as `bsup` is to `sup`. -/
def blsub (o : ordinal.{u}) (f : Π a < o, ordinal.{max u v}) : ordinal.{max u v} :=
o.bsup (λ a ha, succ (f a ha))
@[simp] theorem bsup_eq_blsub (o : ordinal) (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
bsup o (λ a ha, succ (f a ha)) = blsub o f :=
rfl
theorem lsub_eq_blsub' {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o) (f) :
lsub (family_of_bfamily' r ho f) = blsub o f :=
sup_eq_bsup' r ho (λ a ha, succ (f a ha))
theorem lsub_eq_lsub {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop)
[is_well_order ι r] [is_well_order ι' r'] {o} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : Π a < o, ordinal) : lsub (family_of_bfamily' r ho f) = lsub (family_of_bfamily' r' ho' f) :=
by rw [lsub_eq_blsub', lsub_eq_blsub']
@[simp] theorem lsub_eq_blsub {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
lsub (family_of_bfamily o f) = blsub o f :=
lsub_eq_blsub' _ _ _
@[simp] theorem blsub_eq_lsub' {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] (f : ι → ordinal) :
blsub _ (bfamily_of_family' r f) = lsub f :=
bsup_eq_sup' r (succ ∘ f)
theorem blsub_eq_blsub {ι : Type u} (r r' : ι → ι → Prop) [is_well_order ι r] [is_well_order ι r']
(f : ι → ordinal) : blsub _ (bfamily_of_family' r f) = blsub _ (bfamily_of_family' r' f) :=
by rw [blsub_eq_lsub', blsub_eq_lsub']
@[simp] theorem blsub_eq_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : blsub _ (bfamily_of_family f) = lsub f :=
blsub_eq_lsub' _ _
@[congr] lemma blsub_congr {o₁ o₂ : ordinal} (f : Π a < o₁, ordinal) (ho : o₁ = o₂) :
blsub o₁ f = blsub o₂ (λ a h, f a (h.trans_eq ho.symm)) :=
by subst ho
theorem blsub_le_iff {o f a} : blsub o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h < a :=
by { convert bsup_le_iff, simp [succ_le_iff] }
theorem blsub_le {o : ordinal} {f : Π b < o, ordinal} {a} : (∀ i h, f i h < a) → blsub o f ≤ a :=
blsub_le_iff.2
theorem lt_blsub {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) (i h) : f i h < blsub o f :=
blsub_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ _
theorem lt_blsub_iff {o f a} : a < blsub o f ↔ ∃ i hi, a ≤ f i hi :=
by simpa only [not_forall, not_lt, not_le] using not_congr (@blsub_le_iff _ f a)
theorem bsup_le_blsub {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : bsup o f ≤ blsub o f :=
bsup_le (λ i h, (lt_blsub f i h).le)
theorem blsub_le_bsup_succ {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : blsub o f ≤ succ (bsup o f) :=
blsub_le (λ i h, lt_succ_iff.2 (le_bsup f i h))
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_or_succ_bsup_eq_blsub {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
bsup o f = blsub o f ∨ succ (bsup o f) = blsub o f :=
by { rw [←sup_eq_bsup, ←lsub_eq_blsub], exact sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub _ }
theorem bsup_succ_le_blsub {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
succ (bsup o f) ≤ blsub o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = bsup o f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ by_contra' hf,
exact ne_of_lt (succ_le_iff.1 h) (le_antisymm (bsup_le_blsub f)
(blsub_le (lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup.1 hf))) },
rintro ⟨_, _, hf⟩,
rw [succ_le_iff, ←hf],
exact lt_blsub _ _ _
end
theorem bsup_succ_eq_blsub {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
succ (bsup o f) = blsub o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = bsup o f :=
(blsub_le_bsup_succ f).le_iff_eq.symm.trans (bsup_succ_le_blsub f)
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_iff_succ {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
bsup o f = blsub o f ↔ ∀ a < blsub o f, succ a < blsub o f :=
by { rw [←sup_eq_bsup, ←lsub_eq_blsub], apply sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ }
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
bsup o f = blsub o f ↔ ∀ i hi, f i hi < bsup o f :=
⟨λ h i, (by { rw h, apply lt_blsub }), λ h, le_antisymm (bsup_le_blsub f) (blsub_le h)⟩
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_of_lt_succ_limit {o} (ho : is_limit o) {f : Π a < o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha < f (succ a) (ho.2 a ha)) : bsup o f = blsub o f :=
begin
rw bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup,
exact λ i hi, (hf i hi).trans_le (le_bsup f _ _)
end
theorem blsub_succ_of_mono {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < succ o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i j} hi hj, i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) : blsub _ f = succ (f o (lt_succ o)) :=
bsup_succ_of_mono $ λ i j hi hj h, succ_le_succ (hf hi hj h)
@[simp] theorem blsub_eq_zero_iff {o} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} : blsub o f = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
by { rw [←lsub_eq_blsub, lsub_eq_zero_iff], exact out_empty_iff_eq_zero }
@[simp] lemma blsub_zero (f : Π a < (0 : ordinal), ordinal) : blsub 0 f = 0 :=
by rwa blsub_eq_zero_iff
lemma blsub_pos {o : ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : 0 < blsub o f :=
(ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt (lt_blsub f 0 ho)
theorem blsub_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f) :
blsub (type r) f = lsub (λ a, f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _)) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ o,
by rw [blsub_le_iff, lsub_le_iff]; exact
⟨λ H b, H _ _, λ H i h, by simpa only [typein_enum] using H (enum r i h)⟩
theorem blsub_const {o : ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) (a : ordinal) : blsub.{u v} o (λ _ _, a) = succ a :=
bsup_const.{u v} ho (succ a)
@[simp] theorem blsub_one (f : Π a < (1 : ordinal), ordinal) : blsub 1 f = succ (f 0 zero_lt_one) :=
bsup_one _
@[simp] theorem blsub_id : ∀ o, blsub.{u u} o (λ x _, x) = o :=
lsub_typein
theorem bsup_id_limit {o : ordinal} : (∀ a < o, succ a < o) → bsup.{u u} o (λ x _, x) = o :=
sup_typein_limit
@[simp] theorem bsup_id_succ (o) : bsup.{u u} (succ o) (λ x _, x) = o :=
sup_typein_succ
theorem blsub_le_of_brange_subset {o o'} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} {g : Π a < o', ordinal}
(h : brange o f ⊆ brange o' g) : blsub.{u (max v w)} o f ≤ blsub.{v (max u w)} o' g :=
bsup_le_of_brange_subset $ λ a ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩, begin
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := h ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩,
simp_rw ←hc' at hb',
exact ⟨c, hc, hb'⟩
end
theorem blsub_eq_of_brange_eq {o o'} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} {g : Π a < o', ordinal}
(h : {o | ∃ i hi, f i hi = o} = {o | ∃ i hi, g i hi = o}) :
blsub.{u (max v w)} o f = blsub.{v (max u w)} o' g :=
(blsub_le_of_brange_subset h.le).antisymm (blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{v u w} h.ge)
theorem bsup_comp {o o' : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi) (hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) {g : Π a < o', ordinal} (hg : blsub o' g = o) :
bsup o' (λ a ha, f (g a ha) (by { rw ←hg, apply lt_blsub })) = bsup o f :=
begin
apply le_antisymm;
refine bsup_le (λ i hi, _),
{ apply le_bsup },
{ rw [←hg, lt_blsub_iff] at hi,
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩,
exact (hf _ _ hj').trans (le_bsup _ _ _) }
end
theorem blsub_comp {o o' : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi) (hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) {g : Π a < o', ordinal} (hg : blsub o' g = o) :
blsub o' (λ a ha, f (g a ha) (by { rw ←hg, apply lt_blsub })) = blsub o f :=
@bsup_comp o _ (λ a ha, succ (f a ha)) (λ i j _ _ h, succ_le_succ_iff.2 (hf _ _ h)) g hg
theorem is_normal.bsup_eq {f} (H : is_normal f) {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) :
bsup.{u} o (λ x _, f x) = f o :=
by { rw [←is_normal.bsup.{u u} H (λ x _, x) h.1, bsup_id_limit h.2] }
theorem is_normal.blsub_eq {f} (H : is_normal f) {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) :
blsub.{u} o (λ x _, f x) = f o :=
by { rw [←H.bsup_eq h, bsup_eq_blsub_of_lt_succ_limit h], exact (λ a _, H.1 a) }
theorem is_normal_iff_lt_succ_and_bsup_eq {f} :
is_normal f ↔ (∀ a, f a < f (succ a)) ∧ ∀ o, is_limit o → bsup o (λ x _, f x) = f o :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.1, @is_normal.bsup_eq f h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, λ o ho a,
(by {rw ←h₂ o ho, exact bsup_le_iff})⟩⟩
theorem is_normal_iff_lt_succ_and_blsub_eq {f} :
is_normal f ↔ (∀ a, f a < f (succ a)) ∧ ∀ o, is_limit o → blsub o (λ x _, f x) = f o :=
begin
rw [is_normal_iff_lt_succ_and_bsup_eq, and.congr_right_iff],
intro h,
split;
intros H o ho;
have := H o ho;
rwa ←bsup_eq_blsub_of_lt_succ_limit ho (λ a _, h a) at *
end
theorem is_normal.eq_iff_zero_and_succ {f g : ordinal.{u} → ordinal.{u}} (hf : is_normal f)
(hg : is_normal g) : f = g ↔ f 0 = g 0 ∧ ∀ a, f a = g a → f (succ a) = g (succ a) :=
⟨λ h, by simp [h], λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, funext (λ a, begin
apply a.limit_rec_on,
assumption',
intros o ho H,
rw [←is_normal.bsup_eq.{u u} hf ho, ←is_normal.bsup_eq.{u u} hg ho],
congr,
ext b hb,
exact H b hb
end)⟩
/-! ### Minimum excluded ordinals -/
/-- The minimum excluded ordinal in a family of ordinals. -/
def mex {ι : Type u} (f : ι → ordinal.{max u v}) : ordinal :=
Inf (set.range f)ᶜ
theorem mex_not_mem_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → ordinal.{max u v}) : mex f ∉ set.range f :=
Inf_mem (nonempty_compl_range f)
theorem ne_mex {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ∀ i, f i ≠ mex f :=
by simpa using mex_not_mem_range f
theorem mex_le_of_ne {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} (ha : ∀ i, f i ≠ a) : mex f ≤ a :=
cInf_le' (by simp [ha])
theorem exists_of_lt_mex {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} (ha : a < mex f) : ∃ i, f i = a :=
by { by_contra' ha', exact ha.not_le (mex_le_of_ne ha') }
theorem mex_le_lsub {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : mex f ≤ lsub f :=
cInf_le' (lsub_not_mem_range f)
theorem mex_monotone {α β} {f : α → ordinal} {g : β → ordinal} (h : set.range f ⊆ set.range g) :
mex f ≤ mex g :=
begin
refine mex_le_of_ne (λ i hi, _),
cases h ⟨i, rfl⟩ with j hj,
rw ←hj at hi,
exact ne_mex g j hi
end
theorem mex_lt_ord_succ_mk {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : mex f < (succ (#ι)).ord :=
begin
by_contra' h,
apply (lt_succ (#ι)).not_le,
have H := λ a, exists_of_lt_mex ((typein_lt_self a).trans_le h),
let g : (succ (#ι)).ord.out.α → ι := λ a, classical.some (H a),
have hg : injective g := λ a b h', begin
have Hf : ∀ x, f (g x) = typein (<) x := λ a, classical.some_spec (H a),
apply_fun f at h',
rwa [Hf, Hf, typein_inj] at h'
end,
convert cardinal.mk_le_of_injective hg,
rw cardinal.mk_ord_out
end
/-- The minimum excluded ordinal of a family of ordinals indexed by the set of ordinals less than
some `o : ordinal.{u}`. This is a special case of `mex` over the family provided by
`family_of_bfamily`.
This is to `mex` as `bsup` is to `sup`. -/
def bmex (o : ordinal) (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : ordinal :=
mex (family_of_bfamily o f)
theorem bmex_not_mem_brange {o : ordinal} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : bmex o f ∉ brange o f :=
by { rw ←range_family_of_bfamily, apply mex_not_mem_range }
theorem ne_bmex {o : ordinal} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) {i} (hi) : f i hi ≠ bmex o f :=
begin
convert ne_mex _ (enum (<) i (by rwa type_lt)),
rw family_of_bfamily_enum
end
theorem bmex_le_of_ne {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} {a} (ha : ∀ i hi, f i hi ≠ a) :
bmex o f ≤ a :=
mex_le_of_ne (λ i, ha _ _)
theorem exists_of_lt_bmex {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} {a} (ha : a < bmex o f) :
∃ i hi, f i hi = a :=
begin
cases exists_of_lt_mex ha with i hi,
exact ⟨_, typein_lt_self i, hi⟩
end
theorem bmex_le_blsub {o : ordinal} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) : bmex o f ≤ blsub o f :=
mex_le_lsub _
theorem bmex_monotone {o o' : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal} {g : Π a < o', ordinal}
(h : brange o f ⊆ brange o' g) : bmex o f ≤ bmex o' g :=
mex_monotone (by rwa [range_family_of_bfamily, range_family_of_bfamily])
theorem bmex_lt_ord_succ_card {o : ordinal} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) :
bmex o f < (succ o.card).ord :=
by { rw ←mk_ordinal_out, exact (mex_lt_ord_succ_mk (family_of_bfamily o f)) }
end ordinal
/-! ### Results about injectivity and surjectivity -/
lemma not_surjective_of_ordinal {α : Type u} (f : α → ordinal.{u}) : ¬ surjective f :=
λ h, ordinal.lsub_not_mem_range.{u u} f (h _)
lemma not_injective_of_ordinal {α : Type u} (f : ordinal.{u} → α) : ¬ injective f :=
λ h, not_surjective_of_ordinal _ (inv_fun_surjective h)
lemma not_surjective_of_ordinal_of_small {α : Type v} [small.{u} α] (f : α → ordinal.{u}) :
¬ surjective f :=
λ h, not_surjective_of_ordinal _ (h.comp (equiv_shrink _).symm.surjective)
lemma not_injective_of_ordinal_of_small {α : Type v} [small.{u} α] (f : ordinal.{u} → α) :
¬ injective f :=
λ h, not_injective_of_ordinal _ ((equiv_shrink _).injective.comp h)
/-- The type of ordinals in universe `u` is not `small.{u}`. This is the type-theoretic analog of
the Burali-Forti paradox. -/
theorem not_small_ordinal : ¬ small.{u} ordinal.{max u v} :=
λ h, @not_injective_of_ordinal_of_small _ h _ (λ a b, ordinal.lift_inj.1)
/-! ### Enumerating unbounded sets of ordinals with ordinals -/
namespace ordinal
section
/-- Enumerator function for an unbounded set of ordinals. -/
def enum_ord (S : set ordinal.{u}) : ordinal → ordinal :=
lt_wf.fix (λ o f, Inf (S ∩ set.Ici (blsub.{u u} o f)))
variables {S : set ordinal.{u}}
/-- The equation that characterizes `enum_ord` definitionally. This isn't the nicest expression to
work with, so consider using `enum_ord_def` instead. -/
theorem enum_ord_def' (o) :
enum_ord S o = Inf (S ∩ set.Ici (blsub.{u u} o (λ a _, enum_ord S a))) :=
lt_wf.fix_eq _ _
/-- The set in `enum_ord_def'` is nonempty. -/
theorem enum_ord_def'_nonempty (hS : unbounded (<) S) (a) : (S ∩ set.Ici a).nonempty :=
let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := hS a in ⟨b, hb, le_of_not_gt hb'⟩
private theorem enum_ord_mem_aux (hS : unbounded (<) S) (o) :
(enum_ord S o) ∈ S ∩ set.Ici (blsub.{u u} o (λ c _, enum_ord S c)) :=
by { rw enum_ord_def', exact Inf_mem (enum_ord_def'_nonempty hS _) }
theorem enum_ord_mem (hS : unbounded (<) S) (o) : enum_ord S o ∈ S :=
(enum_ord_mem_aux hS o).left
theorem blsub_le_enum_ord (hS : unbounded (<) S) (o) :
blsub.{u u} o (λ c _, enum_ord S c) ≤ enum_ord S o :=
(enum_ord_mem_aux hS o).right
theorem enum_ord_strict_mono (hS : unbounded (<) S) : strict_mono (enum_ord S) :=
λ _ _ h, (lt_blsub.{u u} _ _ h).trans_le (blsub_le_enum_ord hS _)
/-- A more workable definition for `enum_ord`. -/
theorem enum_ord_def (o) :
enum_ord S o = Inf (S ∩ {b | ∀ c, c < o → enum_ord S c < b}) :=
begin
rw enum_ord_def',
congr, ext,
exact ⟨λ h a hao, (lt_blsub.{u u} _ _ hao).trans_le h, blsub_le⟩
end
/-- The set in `enum_ord_def` is nonempty. -/
lemma enum_ord_def_nonempty (hS : unbounded (<) S) {o} :
{x | x ∈ S ∧ ∀ c, c < o → enum_ord S c < x}.nonempty :=
(⟨_, enum_ord_mem hS o, λ _ b, enum_ord_strict_mono hS b⟩)
@[simp] theorem enum_ord_range {f : ordinal → ordinal} (hf : strict_mono f) :
enum_ord (range f) = f :=
funext (λ o, begin
apply ordinal.induction o,
intros a H,
rw enum_ord_def a,
have Hfa : f a ∈ range f ∩ {b | ∀ c, c < a → enum_ord (range f) c < b} :=
⟨mem_range_self a, λ b hb, (by {rw H b hb, exact hf hb})⟩,
refine (cInf_le' Hfa).antisymm ((le_cInf_iff'' ⟨_, Hfa⟩).2 _),
rintros _ ⟨⟨c, rfl⟩, hc : ∀ b < a, enum_ord (range f) b < f c⟩,
rw hf.le_iff_le,
contrapose! hc,
exact ⟨c, hc, (H c hc).ge⟩,
end)
@[simp] theorem enum_ord_univ : enum_ord set.univ = id :=
by { rw ←range_id, exact enum_ord_range strict_mono_id }
@[simp] theorem enum_ord_zero : enum_ord S 0 = Inf S :=
by { rw enum_ord_def, simp [ordinal.not_lt_zero] }
theorem enum_ord_succ_le {a b} (hS : unbounded (<) S) (ha : a ∈ S) (hb : enum_ord S b < a) :
enum_ord S (succ b) ≤ a :=
begin
rw enum_ord_def,
exact cInf_le' ⟨ha, λ c hc, ((enum_ord_strict_mono hS).monotone (le_of_lt_succ hc)).trans_lt hb⟩
end
theorem enum_ord_le_of_subset {S T : set ordinal} (hS : unbounded (<) S) (hST : S ⊆ T) (a) :
enum_ord T a ≤ enum_ord S a :=
begin
apply ordinal.induction a,
intros b H,
rw enum_ord_def,
exact cInf_le' ⟨hST (enum_ord_mem hS b), λ c h, (H c h).trans_lt (enum_ord_strict_mono hS h)⟩
end
theorem enum_ord_surjective (hS : unbounded (<) S) : ∀ s ∈ S, ∃ a, enum_ord S a = s :=
λ s hs, ⟨Sup {a | enum_ord S a ≤ s}, begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw enum_ord_def,
refine cInf_le' ⟨hs, λ a ha, _⟩,
have : enum_ord S 0 ≤ s := by { rw enum_ord_zero, exact cInf_le' hs },
rcases exists_lt_of_lt_cSup (by exact ⟨0, this⟩) ha with ⟨b, hb, hab⟩,
exact (enum_ord_strict_mono hS hab).trans_le hb },
{ by_contra' h,
exact (le_cSup ⟨s, λ a,
(lt_wf.self_le_of_strict_mono (enum_ord_strict_mono hS) a).trans⟩
(enum_ord_succ_le hS hs h)).not_lt (lt_succ _) }
end⟩
/-- An order isomorphism between an unbounded set of ordinals and the ordinals. -/
def enum_ord_order_iso (hS : unbounded (<) S) : ordinal ≃o S :=
strict_mono.order_iso_of_surjective (λ o, ⟨_, enum_ord_mem hS o⟩) (enum_ord_strict_mono hS)
(λ s, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := enum_ord_surjective hS s s.prop in ⟨a, subtype.eq ha⟩)
theorem range_enum_ord (hS : unbounded (<) S) : range (enum_ord S) = S :=
by { rw range_eq_iff, exact ⟨enum_ord_mem hS, enum_ord_surjective hS⟩ }
/-- A characterization of `enum_ord`: it is the unique strict monotonic function with range `S`. -/
theorem eq_enum_ord (f : ordinal → ordinal) (hS : unbounded (<) S) :
strict_mono f ∧ range f = S ↔ f = enum_ord S :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
rwa [←lt_wf.eq_strict_mono_iff_eq_range h₁ (enum_ord_strict_mono hS), range_enum_ord hS] },
{ rintro rfl,
exact ⟨enum_ord_strict_mono hS, range_enum_ord hS⟩ }
end
end
/-! ### Ordinal exponential -/
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion. -/
instance : has_pow ordinal ordinal :=
⟨λ a b, if a = 0 then 1 - b else limit_rec_on b 1 (λ _ IH, IH * a) (λ b _, bsup.{u u} b)⟩
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem opow_def (a b : ordinal) :
a ^ b = if a = 0 then 1 - b else limit_rec_on b 1 (λ _ IH, IH * a) (λ b _, bsup.{u u} b) :=
rfl
theorem zero_opow' (a : ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
by simp only [opow_def, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem zero_opow {a : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^ a = 0 :=
by rwa [zero_opow', ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp] theorem opow_zero (a : ordinal) : a ^ 0 = 1 :=
by by_cases a = 0; [simp only [opow_def, if_pos h, sub_zero],
simp only [opow_def, if_neg h, limit_rec_on_zero]]
@[simp] theorem opow_succ (a b : ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a :=
if h : a = 0 then by subst a; simp only [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero _), mul_zero]
else by simp only [opow_def, limit_rec_on_succ, if_neg h]
theorem opow_limit {a b : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b = bsup.{u u} b (λ c _, a ^ c) :=
by simp only [opow_def, if_neg a0]; rw limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _ h; refl
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c :=
by rw [opow_limit a0 h, bsup_le_iff]
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : is_limit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' :=
by rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]; simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
@[simp] theorem opow_one (a : ordinal) : a ^ 1 = a :=
by rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]; simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
@[simp] theorem one_opow (a : ordinal) : 1 ^ a = 1 :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a,
{ simp only [opow_zero] },
{ intros _ ih, simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one] },
refine λ b l IH, eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
rw [opow_le_of_limit ordinal.one_ne_zero l],
exact ⟨λ H, by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos,
λ H b' h, by rwa IH _ h⟩,
end
theorem opow_pos {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b :=
begin
have h0 : 0 < a ^ 0, {simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]},
apply limit_rec_on b,
{ exact h0 },
{ intros b IH, rw [opow_succ],
exact mul_pos IH a0 },
{ exact λ b l _, (lt_opow_of_limit (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2
⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩ },
end
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ opow_pos b $ ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
theorem opow_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : is_normal ((^) a) :=
have a0 : 0 < a, from zero_lt_one.trans h,
⟨λ b, by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
λ b l c, opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(opow_is_normal a1).lt_iff
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(opow_is_normal a1).le_iff
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(opow_is_normal a1).inj
theorem opow_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a ^ b) :=
(opow_is_normal a1).is_limit
theorem opow_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : is_limit (a ^ b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with e|⟨b,rfl⟩|l',
{ exact absurd e hb },
{ rw opow_succ,
exact mul_is_limit (opow_pos _ l.pos) l },
{ exact opow_is_limit l.one_lt l' }
end
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : ordinal}
(h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ h₁,
{ exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂ },
{ subst a, simp only [one_opow] }
end
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : ordinal} (c)
(ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a, by_cases c0 : c = 0,
{ subst c, simp only [opow_zero] },
{ simp only [zero_opow c0, ordinal.zero_le] } },
{ apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [opow_zero] },
{ intros c IH, simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab },
{ exact λ c l IH, (opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2
(λ b' h, (IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right
((ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)) } }
end
theorem left_le_opow (a : ordinal) {b : ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ←opow_one a,
cases le_or_gt a 1 with a1 a1,
{ cases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 a1,
{ rw lt_one_iff_zero at a0,
rw [a0, zero_opow ordinal.one_ne_zero],
exact ordinal.zero_le _ },
rw [a1, one_opow, one_opow] },
rwa [opow_le_opow_iff_right a1, one_le_iff_pos]
end
theorem right_le_opow {a : ordinal} (b) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(opow_is_normal a1).self_le _
theorem opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ {a b c : ordinal}
(ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c :=
by { rw [opow_succ, opow_succ], exact
(mul_le_mul_right' (opow_le_opow_left c ab.le) a).trans_lt
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (opow_pos c ((ordinal.zero_le a).trans_lt ab))) }
theorem opow_add (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | a0,
{ rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with rfl | c0, { simp },
have : b + c ≠ 0 := ((ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0).trans_le (le_add_left _ _)).ne',
simp only [zero_opow c0, zero_opow this, mul_zero] },
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with rfl | a1,
{ simp only [one_opow, mul_one] },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp },
{ intros c IH,
rw [add_succ, opow_succ, IH, opow_succ, mul_assoc] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((opow_is_normal a1).trans
(add_is_normal b)).limit_le l).trans _),
simp only [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (((mul_is_normal $ opow_pos b (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(opow_is_normal a1)).limit_le l).symm }
end
theorem opow_one_add (a b : ordinal) : a ^ (1 + b) = a * a ^ b :=
by rw [opow_add, opow_one]
theorem opow_dvd_opow (a) {b c : ordinal}
(h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
by { rw [← ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, opow_add], apply dvd_mul_right }
theorem opow_dvd_opow_iff {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_le_of_lt ((opow_lt_opow_iff_right a1).2 hn) $
le_of_dvd (opow_ne_zero _ $ one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 $ a1.le) h,
opow_dvd_opow _⟩
theorem opow_mul (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp only [b0, zero_mul, opow_zero, one_opow]},
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a,
by_cases c0 : c = 0, {simp only [c0, mul_zero, opow_zero]},
simp only [zero_opow b0, zero_opow c0, zero_opow (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)] },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1,
{ subst a1, simp only [one_opow] },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [mul_zero, opow_zero] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, opow_add, IH, opow_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((opow_is_normal a1).trans
(mul_is_normal (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le l).trans _),
simp only [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (opow_le_of_limit (opow_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm }
end
/-! ### Ordinal logarithm -/
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation `x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and
`w < b ^ u`. -/
@[pp_nodot] def log (b : ordinal) (x : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if h : 1 < b then pred (Inf {o | x < b ^ o}) else 0
/-- The set in the definition of `log` is nonempty. -/
theorem log_nonempty {b x : ordinal} (h : 1 < b) : {o | x < b ^ o}.nonempty :=
⟨_, succ_le_iff.1 (right_le_opow _ h)⟩
theorem log_def {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x = pred (Inf {o | x < b ^ o}) :=
by simp only [log, dif_pos b1]
theorem log_of_not_one_lt_left {b : ordinal} (b1 : ¬ 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x = 0 :=
by simp only [log, dif_neg b1]
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ordinal} (b1 : b ≤ 1) : ∀ x, log b x = 0 :=
log_of_not_one_lt_left b1.not_lt
@[simp] lemma log_zero_left : ∀ b, log 0 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one zero_le_one
@[simp] theorem log_zero_right (b : ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 :=
if b1 : 1 < b then begin
rw [log_def b1, ← ordinal.le_zero, pred_le],
apply cInf_le',
dsimp,
rw [succ_zero, opow_one],
exact zero_lt_one.trans b1
end
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left b1]
@[simp] theorem log_one_left : ∀ b, log 1 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
theorem succ_log_def {b x : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) :
succ (log b x) = Inf {o | x < b ^ o} :=
begin
let t := Inf {o | x < b ^ o},
have : x < b ^ t := Inf_mem (log_nonempty b1),
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with h|h|h,
{ refine ((one_le_iff_pos.2 x0).not_lt _).elim,
simpa only [h, opow_zero] },
{ rw [show log b x = pred t, from log_def b1 x,
succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h] },
{ rcases (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans b1).ne' h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact h₁.not_le.elim ((le_cInf_iff'' (log_nonempty b1)).1 le_rfl a h₂) }
end
theorem lt_opow_succ_log_self {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : x < b ^ succ (log b x) :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (ordinal.zero_le x) with x0 x0,
{ rw [succ_log_def b1 x0], exact Inf_mem (log_nonempty b1) },
{ subst x, apply opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans b1) }
end
theorem opow_log_le_self (b) {x : ordinal} (x0 : 0 < x) : b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | b0,
{ rw zero_opow',
refine (sub_le_self _ _).trans (one_le_iff_pos.2 x0) },
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with b1 b1,
{ refine le_of_not_lt (λ h, (lt_succ (log b x)).not_le _),
have := @cInf_le' _ _ {o | x < b ^ o} _ h,
rwa ←succ_log_def b1 x0 at this },
{ rw [←b1, one_opow], exact one_le_iff_pos.2 x0 }
end
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection. -/
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
(lt_opow_succ_log_self b1 x).not_le $
((opow_le_opow_iff_right b1).2 (succ_le_of_lt hn)).trans h,
λ h, ((opow_le_opow_iff_right b1).2 h).trans (opow_log_le_self b x0)⟩
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log b1 x0)
@[mono] theorem log_mono_right (b) {x y : ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) : log b x ≤ log b y :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp only [x0, log_zero_right, ordinal.zero_le] else
have x0 : 0 < x, from ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0,
if b1 : 1 < b then
(opow_le_iff_le_log b1 (lt_of_lt_of_le x0 xy)).1 $ (opow_log_le_self _ x0).trans xy
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left b1, ordinal.zero_le]
theorem log_le_self (b x : ordinal) : log b x ≤ x :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp only [x0, log_zero_right, ordinal.zero_le] else
if b1 : 1 < b then (right_le_opow _ b1).trans (opow_log_le_self b (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0))
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left b1, ordinal.zero_le]
@[simp] theorem log_one_right (b : ordinal) : log b 1 = 0 :=
if hb : 1 < b then by rwa [←lt_one_iff_zero, ←lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb zero_lt_one, opow_one]
else log_of_not_one_lt_left hb 1
theorem mod_opow_log_lt_self {b o : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o0 : o ≠ 0) : o % b ^ log b o < o :=
(mod_lt _ $ opow_ne_zero _ b0).trans_le (opow_log_le_self _ $ ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 o0)
lemma opow_mul_add_pos {b v : ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (u) (hv : 0 < v) (w) : 0 < b ^ u * v + w :=
(opow_pos u hb).trans_le ((le_mul_left _ hv).trans (le_add_right _ _))
lemma opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ {b u w : ordinal} (v : ordinal) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ u * (succ v) :=
by rwa [mul_succ, add_lt_add_iff_left]
lemma opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ {b u v w : ordinal} (hvb : v < b) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ (succ u) :=
begin
convert (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ v hw).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt hvb) _),
exact opow_succ b u
end
theorem log_opow_mul_add {b u v w : ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hv : 0 < v) (hvb : v < b)
(hw : w < b ^ u) : log b (b ^ u * v + w) = u :=
begin
have hpos := opow_mul_add_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hb) u hv w,
by_contra' hne,
cases lt_or_gt_of_ne hne with h h,
{ rw ←lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb hpos at h,
exact h.not_le ((le_mul_left _ hv).trans (le_add_right _ _)) },
{ change _ < _ at h,
rw [←succ_le_iff, ←opow_le_iff_le_log hb hpos] at h,
exact (not_lt_of_le h) (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ hvb hw) }
end
@[simp] theorem log_opow {b : ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b (b ^ x) = x :=
begin
convert log_opow_mul_add hb zero_lt_one hb (opow_pos x (zero_lt_one.trans hb)),
rw [add_zero, mul_one]
end
theorem add_log_le_log_mul {x y : ordinal} (b : ordinal) (x0 : 0 < x) (y0 : 0 < y) :
log b x + log b y ≤ log b (x * y) :=
begin
by_cases hb : 1 < b,
{ rw [←opow_le_iff_le_log hb (mul_pos x0 y0), opow_add],
exact mul_le_mul' (opow_log_le_self b x0) (opow_log_le_self b y0) },
simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left hb, zero_add]
end
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m * n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by rw [nat.mul_succ, nat.cast_add, nat_cast_mul, nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_opow (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((pow m n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by rw [pow_succ', nat_cast_mul, nat_cast_opow, nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_le {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw [←cardinal.ord_nat, ←cardinal.ord_nat, cardinal.ord_le_ord, cardinal.nat_cast_le]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
by simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, nat_cast_le]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) = n ↔ m = n :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, nat_cast_le]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
@nat_cast_inj n 0
theorem nat_cast_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr nat_cast_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : ordinal) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
@nat_cast_lt 0 n
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m - n :=
begin
cases le_total m n with h h,
{ rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (nat_cast_le.2 h)],
refl },
{ apply (add_left_cancel n).1,
rw [←nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h, ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (nat_cast_le.2 h)] }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m / n :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn,
{ simp },
{ have hn' := nat_cast_ne_zero.2 hn,
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [le_div hn', ←nat_cast_mul, nat_cast_le, mul_comm],
apply nat.div_mul_le_self },
{ rw [div_le hn', ←add_one_eq_succ, ←nat.cast_succ, ←nat_cast_mul, nat_cast_lt, mul_comm,
←nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)],
apply nat.lt_succ_self } }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m % n :=
by rw [←add_left_cancel, div_add_mod, ←nat_cast_div, ←nat_cast_mul, ←nat.cast_add, nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp] theorem lift_nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u v} n = n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by simp [lift_nat_cast n]
end ordinal
/-! ### Properties of `omega` -/
namespace cardinal
open ordinal
@[simp] theorem ord_aleph_0 : ord.{u} ℵ₀ = ω :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ le_rfl) $
le_of_forall_lt $ λ o h, begin
rcases ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨o, rfl, h'⟩,
rw [lt_ord, ←lift_card, ←lift_aleph_0.{0 u}, lift_lt, ←typein_enum (<) h'],
exact lt_aleph_0_iff_fintype.2 ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
end
@[simp] theorem add_one_of_aleph_0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c :=
begin
rw [add_comm, ←card_ord c, ←card_one, ←card_add, one_add_of_omega_le],
rwa [←ord_aleph_0, ord_le_ord]
end
end cardinal
namespace ordinal
theorem lt_add_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit c) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b + c' :=
by rw [←is_normal.bsup_eq.{u u} (add_is_normal b) h, lt_bsup]
theorem lt_omega {o : ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n :=
by simp_rw [←cardinal.ord_aleph_0, cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph_0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem omega_pos : 0 < ω := nat_lt_omega 0
theorem omega_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 := omega_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega : 1 < ω := by simpa only [nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega 1
theorem omega_is_limit : is_limit ω :=
⟨omega_ne_zero, λ o h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e]; exact nat_lt_omega (n+1)⟩
theorem omega_le {o : ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨λ h n, (nat_lt_omega _).le.trans h,
λ H, le_of_forall_lt $ λ a h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e, ←succ_le_iff]; exact H (n+1)⟩
@[simp] theorem sup_nat_cast : sup nat.cast = ω :=
(sup_le $ λ n, (nat_lt_omega n).le).antisymm $ omega_le.2 $ le_sup _
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 := lt_of_le_of_ne (ordinal.zero_le o) h.1.symm
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (nat_lt_limit n)
theorem omega_le_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega_le.2 $ λ n, le_of_lt $ nat_lt_limit h n
theorem is_limit_iff_omega_dvd {a : ordinal} : is_limit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a :=
begin
refine ⟨λ l, ⟨l.1, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm _ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, λ h, _⟩,
{ refine (limit_le l).2 (λ x hx, le_of_lt _),
rw [←div_lt omega_ne_zero, ←succ_le_iff, le_div omega_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit omega_is_limit],
intros b hb,
rcases lt_omega.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact (add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 $ nat_lt_limit (sub_is_limit l hx) _).le },
{ rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩,
refine mul_is_limit_left omega_is_limit (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ mt _ a0),
intro e, simp only [e, mul_zero] }
end
theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) :
(a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 $ λ c' h, begin
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans,
rw IH _ h,
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans,
{ rw ← mul_succ, exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt $ l.2 _ h) _ },
{ apply_instance },
{ rw ← ba, exact le_add_right _ _ }
end)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) :
(a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [succ_zero, mul_one] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
have := add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH,
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc] }
end
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l (λ c' _, add_mul_succ c' ba)
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
begin
have H : a + (c - a) = c := ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (by {rw ←add_zero a, exact (h _ hb).le}),
rw ←H,
apply add_le_add_left _ a,
by_contra' hb,
exact (h _ hb).ne H
end
theorem is_normal.apply_omega {f : ordinal.{u} → ordinal.{u}} (hf : is_normal f) :
sup.{0 u} (f ∘ nat.cast) = f ω :=
by rw [←sup_nat_cast, is_normal.sup.{0 u u} hf _ ⟨0⟩]
@[simp] theorem sup_add_nat (o : ordinal) : sup (λ n : ℕ, o + n) = o + ω :=
(add_is_normal o).apply_omega
@[simp] theorem sup_mul_nat (o : ordinal) : sup (λ n : ℕ, o * n) = o * ω :=
begin
rcases eq_zero_or_pos o with rfl | ho,
{ rw zero_mul, exact sup_eq_zero_iff.2 (λ n, zero_mul n) },
{ exact (mul_is_normal ho).apply_omega }
end
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem sup_opow_nat {o : ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : sup (λ n : ℕ, o ^ n) = o ^ ω :=
begin
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 ho) with ho₁ | rfl,
{ exact (opow_is_normal ho₁).apply_omega },
{ rw one_opow,
refine le_antisymm (sup_le (λ n, by rw one_opow)) _,
convert le_sup _ 0,
rw [nat.cast_zero, opow_zero] }
end
end ordinal
|
d6c1f90214798a63df7cf4254e4d9c4ecfb508a7 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/data/lazy_list_auto.lean | e6e15040b2c3c4547c3feee1505983fb00239149 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,590 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
universes u l v w
namespace Mathlib
inductive lazy_list (α : Type u) where
| nil : lazy_list α
| cons : α → thunk (lazy_list α) → lazy_list α
namespace lazy_list
def singleton {α : Type u} : α → lazy_list α := sorry
def of_list {α : Type u} : List α → lazy_list α := sorry
def to_list {α : Type u} : lazy_list α → List α := sorry
def head {α : Type u} [Inhabited α] : lazy_list α → α := sorry
def tail {α : Type u} : lazy_list α → lazy_list α := sorry
def append {α : Type u} : lazy_list α → thunk (lazy_list α) → lazy_list α := sorry
def map {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) : lazy_list α → lazy_list β := sorry
def map₂ {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w} (f : α → β → δ) :
lazy_list α → lazy_list β → lazy_list δ :=
sorry
def zip {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lazy_list α → lazy_list β → lazy_list (α × β) := map₂ Prod.mk
def join {α : Type u} : lazy_list (lazy_list α) → lazy_list α := sorry
def for {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (l : lazy_list α) (f : α → β) : lazy_list β := map f l
def approx {α : Type u} : ℕ → lazy_list α → List α := sorry
def filter {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : lazy_list α → lazy_list α := sorry
def nth {α : Type u} : lazy_list α → ℕ → Option α := sorry
end Mathlib |
f438a8b3910682d6ad6f51bf2b375a56b439b0ef | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/geometry/euclidean/basic.lean | 57d4ced0134472fee9ffe6f08c4c74ab255965dd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,868 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import analysis.inner_product_space.projection
import algebra.quadratic_discriminant
/-!
# Euclidean spaces
This file makes some definitions and proves very basic geometrical
results about real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
Results about real inner product spaces that involve the norm and
inner product but not angles generally go in
`analysis.normed_space.inner_product`. Results with longer
proofs or more geometrical content generally go in separate files.
## Main definitions
* `euclidean_geometry.orthogonal_projection` is the orthogonal
projection of a point onto an affine subspace.
* `euclidean_geometry.reflection` is the reflection of a point in an
affine subspace.
## Implementation notes
To declare `P` as the type of points in a Euclidean affine space with
`V` as the type of vectors, use `[inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]`. This works better with `out_param` to make
`V` implicit in most cases than having a separate type alias for
Euclidean affine spaces.
Rather than requiring Euclidean affine spaces to be finite-dimensional
(as in the definition on Wikipedia), this is specified only for those
theorems that need it.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_space
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators
open_locale classical
open_locale real_inner_product_space
namespace euclidean_geometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some geometrical definitions and results on
Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
/-- The midpoint of the segment AB is the same distance from A as it is from B. -/
lemma dist_left_midpoint_eq_dist_right_midpoint (p1 p2 : P) :
dist p1 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) = dist p2 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) :=
by rw [dist_left_midpoint p1 p2, dist_right_midpoint p1 p2]
/-- The inner product of two vectors given with `weighted_vsub`, in
terms of the pairwise distances. -/
lemma inner_weighted_vsub {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ} (p₁ : ι₁ → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i in s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ} (p₂ : ι₂ → P)
(h₂ : ∑ i in s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪s₁.weighted_vsub p₁ w₁, s₂.weighted_vsub p₂ w₂⟫ =
(-∑ i₁ in s₁, ∑ i₂ in s₂,
w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂) * dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂))) / 2 :=
begin
rw [finset.weighted_vsub_apply, finset.weighted_vsub_apply,
inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero _ h₁ _ h₂],
simp_rw [vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right],
rcongr i₁ i₂; rw dist_eq_norm_vsub V (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂)
end
/-- The distance between two points given with `affine_combination`,
in terms of the pairwise distances between the points in that
combination. -/
lemma dist_affine_combination {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {w₁ w₂ : ι → ℝ} (p : ι → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i in s, w₁ i = 1) (h₂ : ∑ i in s, w₂ i = 1) :
by have a₁ := s.affine_combination p w₁; have a₂ := s.affine_combination p w₂; exact
dist a₁ a₂ * dist a₁ a₂ = (-∑ i₁ in s, ∑ i₂ in s,
(w₁ - w₂) i₁ * (w₁ - w₂) i₂ * (dist (p i₁) (p i₂) * dist (p i₁) (p i₂))) / 2 :=
begin
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.affine_combination p w₁) (s.affine_combination p w₂),
←inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, finset.affine_combination_vsub],
have h : ∑ i in s, (w₁ - w₂) i = 0,
{ simp_rw [pi.sub_apply, finset.sum_sub_distrib, h₁, h₂, sub_self] },
exact inner_weighted_vsub p h p h
end
/-- Suppose that `c₁` is equidistant from `p₁` and `p₂`, and the same
applies to `c₂`. Then the vector between `c₁` and `c₂` is orthogonal
to that between `p₁` and `p₂`. (In two dimensions, this says that the
diagonals of a kite are orthogonal.) -/
lemma inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq {c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ : P} (hc₁ : dist p₁ c₁ = dist p₂ c₁)
(hc₂ : dist p₁ c₂ = dist p₂ c₂) : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
begin
have h : ⟪(c₂ -ᵥ c₁) + (c₂ -ᵥ c₁), p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0,
{ conv_lhs { congr, congr, rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right c₂ c₁ p₁,
skip, rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right c₂ c₁ p₂ },
rw [sub_add_sub_comm, inner_sub_left],
conv_lhs { congr, rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₂ p₁ c₂,
skip, rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₂ p₁ c₁ },
rw [dist_comm p₁, dist_comm p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p₁,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p₂, ←real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff] at hc₁ hc₂,
simp_rw [←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev c₁, ←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev c₂, sub_neg_eq_add,
neg_add_eq_sub, hc₁, hc₂, sub_zero] },
simpa [inner_add_left, ←mul_two, (by norm_num : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0)] using h
end
/-- The squared distance between points on a line (expressed as a
multiple of a fixed vector added to a point) and another point,
expressed as a quadratic. -/
lemma dist_smul_vadd_sq (r : ℝ) (v : V) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ * dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ =
⟪v, v⟫ * r * r + 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * r + ⟪p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ :=
begin
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p₂, ←real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, vadd_vsub_assoc,
real_inner_add_add_self, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right],
ring
end
/-- The condition for two points on a line to be equidistant from
another point. -/
lemma dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist {v : V} (p₁ p₂ : P) (hv : v ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ = dist p₁ p₂ ↔ (r = 0 ∨ r = -2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ / ⟪v, v⟫) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg, dist_smul_vadd_sq,
←sub_eq_zero, add_sub_assoc, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂,
←real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, sub_self] },
have hvi : ⟪v, v⟫ ≠ 0, by simpa using hv,
have hd : discrim ⟪v, v⟫ (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) 0 =
(2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) * (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫),
{ rw discrim, ring },
rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff hvi hd, add_left_neg, zero_div, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
←mul_sub_right_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg, ←mul_two, mul_assoc, mul_div_assoc,
mul_div_mul_left, mul_div_assoc],
norm_num
end
open affine_subspace finite_dimensional
/-- Distances `r₁` `r₂` of `p` from two different points `c₁` `c₂` determine at
most two points `p₁` `p₂` in a two-dimensional subspace containing those points
(two circles intersect in at most two points). -/
lemma eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two {s : affine_subspace ℝ P}
[finite_dimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = 2) {c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ p : P}
(hc₁s : c₁ ∈ s) (hc₂s : c₂ ∈ s) (hp₁s : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂s : p₂ ∈ s) (hps : p ∈ s) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
(hc : c₁ ≠ c₂) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁c₁ : dist p₁ c₁ = r₁) (hp₂c₁ : dist p₂ c₁ = r₁)
(hpc₁ : dist p c₁ = r₁) (hp₁c₂ : dist p₁ c₂ = r₂) (hp₂c₂ : dist p₂ c₂ = r₂)
(hpc₂ : dist p c₂ = r₂) : p = p₁ ∨ p = p₂ :=
begin
have ho : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq (hp₁c₁.trans hp₂c₁.symm) (hp₁c₂.trans hp₂c₂.symm),
have hop : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq (hp₁c₁.trans hpc₁.symm) (hp₁c₂.trans hpc₂.symm),
let b : fin 2 → V := ![c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁],
have hb : linear_independent ℝ b,
{ refine linear_independent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero _ _,
{ intro i,
fin_cases i; simp [b, hc.symm, hp.symm], },
{ intros i j hij,
fin_cases i; fin_cases j; try { exact false.elim (hij rfl) },
{ exact ho },
{ rw real_inner_comm, exact ho } } },
have hbs : submodule.span ℝ (set.range b) = s.direction,
{ refine eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq _ _,
{ rw [submodule.span_le, set.range_subset_iff],
intro i,
fin_cases i,
{ exact vsub_mem_direction hc₂s hc₁s },
{ exact vsub_mem_direction hp₂s hp₁s } },
{ rw [finrank_span_eq_card hb, fintype.card_fin, hd] } },
have hv : ∀ v ∈ s.direction, ∃ t₁ t₂ : ℝ, v = t₁ • (c₂ -ᵥ c₁) + t₂ • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁),
{ intros v hv,
have hr : set.range b = {c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁},
{ have hu : (finset.univ : finset (fin 2)) = {0, 1}, by dec_trivial,
rw [←fintype.coe_image_univ, hu],
simp,
refl },
rw [←hbs, hr, submodule.mem_span_insert] at hv,
rcases hv with ⟨t₁, v', hv', hv⟩,
rw submodule.mem_span_singleton at hv',
rcases hv' with ⟨t₂, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨t₁, t₂, hv⟩ },
rcases hv (p -ᵥ p₁) (vsub_mem_direction hps hp₁s) with ⟨t₁, t₂, hpt⟩,
simp only [hpt, inner_add_right, inner_smul_right, ho, mul_zero, add_zero, mul_eq_zero,
inner_self_eq_zero, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, hc.symm, or_false] at hop,
rw [hop, zero_smul, zero_add, ←eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hpt,
subst hpt,
have hp' : (p₂ -ᵥ p₁ : V) ≠ 0, { simp [hp.symm] },
have hp₂ : dist ((1 : ℝ) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₁) c₁ = r₁, { simp [hp₂c₁] },
rw [←hp₁c₁, dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist _ _ hp'] at hpc₁ hp₂,
simp only [one_ne_zero, false_or] at hp₂,
rw hp₂.symm at hpc₁,
cases hpc₁; simp [hpc₁]
end
/-- Distances `r₁` `r₂` of `p` from two different points `c₁` `c₂` determine at
most two points `p₁` `p₂` in two-dimensional space (two circles intersect in at
most two points). -/
lemma eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_finrank_eq_two [finite_dimensional ℝ V] (hd : finrank ℝ V = 2)
{c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ p : P} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hc : c₁ ≠ c₂) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁c₁ : dist p₁ c₁ = r₁)
(hp₂c₁ : dist p₂ c₁ = r₁) (hpc₁ : dist p c₁ = r₁) (hp₁c₂ : dist p₁ c₂ = r₂)
(hp₂c₂ : dist p₂ c₂ = r₂) (hpc₂ : dist p c₂ = r₂) : p = p₁ ∨ p = p₂ :=
begin
have hd' : finrank ℝ (⊤ : affine_subspace ℝ P).direction = 2,
{ rw [direction_top, finrank_top],
exact hd },
exact eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two hd'
(mem_top ℝ V _) (mem_top ℝ V _) (mem_top ℝ V _) (mem_top ℝ V _) (mem_top ℝ V _)
hc hp hp₁c₁ hp₂c₁ hpc₁ hp₁c₂ hp₂c₂ hpc₂
end
variables {V}
/-- The orthogonal projection of a point onto a nonempty affine
subspace, whose direction is complete, as an unbundled function. This
definition is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
`orthogonal_projection` and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
def orthogonal_projection_fn (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction]
(p : P) : P :=
classical.some $ inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_is_compl
(nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›)
(mk'_nonempty p s.directionᗮ)
begin
rw direction_mk' p s.directionᗮ,
exact submodule.is_compl_orthogonal_of_complete_space,
end
/-- The intersection of the subspace and the orthogonal subspace
through the given point is the `orthogonal_projection_fn` of that
point onto the subspace. This lemma is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
lemma inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection_fn {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
(s : set P) ∩ (mk' p s.directionᗮ) = {orthogonal_projection_fn s p} :=
classical.some_spec $ inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_is_compl
(nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›)
(mk'_nonempty p s.directionᗮ)
begin
rw direction_mk' p s.directionᗮ,
exact submodule.is_compl_orthogonal_of_complete_space
end
/-- The `orthogonal_projection_fn` lies in the given subspace. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version and
should not be used once that is defined. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_mem {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) : orthogonal_projection_fn s p ∈ s :=
begin
rw [←mem_coe, ←set.singleton_subset_iff, ←inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection_fn],
exact set.inter_subset_left _ _
end
/-- The `orthogonal_projection_fn` lies in the orthogonal
subspace. This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the
bundled version and should not be used once that is defined. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_mem_orthogonal {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonal_projection_fn s p ∈ mk' p s.directionᗮ :=
begin
rw [←mem_coe, ←set.singleton_subset_iff, ←inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection_fn],
exact set.inter_subset_right _ _
end
/-- Subtracting `p` from its `orthogonal_projection_fn` produces a
result in the orthogonal direction. This lemma is only intended for
use in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that
is defined. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonal_projection_fn s p -ᵥ p ∈ s.directionᗮ :=
direction_mk' p s.directionᗮ ▸
vsub_mem_direction (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem_orthogonal p) (self_mem_mk' _ _)
local attribute [instance] affine_subspace.to_add_torsor
/-- The orthogonal projection of a point onto a nonempty affine
subspace, whose direction is complete. The corresponding linear map
(mapping a vector to the difference between the projections of two
points whose difference is that vector) is the `orthogonal_projection`
for real inner product spaces, onto the direction of the affine
subspace being projected onto. -/
def orthogonal_projection (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] :
P →ᵃ[ℝ] s :=
{ to_fun := λ p, ⟨orthogonal_projection_fn s p, orthogonal_projection_fn_mem p⟩,
linear := orthogonal_projection s.direction,
map_vadd' := λ p v, begin
have hs : ((orthogonal_projection s.direction) v : V) +ᵥ orthogonal_projection_fn s p ∈ s :=
vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (orthogonal_projection s.direction v).2
(orthogonal_projection_fn_mem p),
have ho : ((orthogonal_projection s.direction) v : V) +ᵥ orthogonal_projection_fn s p ∈
mk' (v +ᵥ p) s.directionᗮ,
{ rw [←vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (self_mem_mk' _ _) _, direction_mk',
vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc],
refine submodule.add_mem _ (orthogonal_projection_fn_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal p) _,
rw submodule.mem_orthogonal',
intros w hw,
rw [←neg_sub, inner_neg_left, orthogonal_projection_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, neg_zero], },
have hm : ((orthogonal_projection s.direction) v : V) +ᵥ orthogonal_projection_fn s p ∈
({orthogonal_projection_fn s (v +ᵥ p)} : set P),
{ rw ←inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection_fn (v +ᵥ p),
exact set.mem_inter hs ho },
rw set.mem_singleton_iff at hm,
ext,
exact hm.symm
end }
@[simp] lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_eq {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonal_projection_fn s p = orthogonal_projection s p :=
rfl
/-- The linear map corresponding to `orthogonal_projection`. -/
@[simp] lemma orthogonal_projection_linear {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] :
(orthogonal_projection s).linear = _root_.orthogonal_projection s.direction :=
rfl
/-- The intersection of the subspace and the orthogonal subspace
through the given point is the `orthogonal_projection` of that point
onto the subspace. -/
lemma inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
(s : set P) ∩ (mk' p s.directionᗮ) = {orthogonal_projection s p} :=
begin
rw ←orthogonal_projection_fn_eq,
exact inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection_fn p
end
/-- The `orthogonal_projection` lies in the given subspace. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_mem {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction]
(p : P) : ↑(orthogonal_projection s p) ∈ s :=
(orthogonal_projection s p).2
/-- The `orthogonal_projection` lies in the orthogonal subspace. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_mem_orthogonal (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
↑(orthogonal_projection s p) ∈ mk' p s.directionᗮ :=
orthogonal_projection_fn_mem_orthogonal p
/-- Subtracting a point in the given subspace from the
`orthogonal_projection` produces a result in the direction of the
given subspace. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_vsub_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p1 : P} (p2 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
↑(orthogonal_projection s p2 -ᵥ ⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s.direction) ∈ s.direction :=
(orthogonal_projection s p2 -ᵥ ⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s.direction).2
/-- Subtracting the `orthogonal_projection` from a point in the given
subspace produces a result in the direction of the given subspace. -/
lemma vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p1 : P} (p2 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
↑((⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s) -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p2 : s.direction) ∈ s.direction :=
((⟨p1, hp1⟩ : s) -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p2 : s.direction).2
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in
the subspace. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p : P} :
↑(orthogonal_projection s p) = p ↔ p ∈ s :=
begin
split,
{ exact λ h, h ▸ orthogonal_projection_mem p },
{ intro h,
have hp : p ∈ ((s : set P) ∩ mk' p s.directionᗮ) := ⟨h, self_mem_mk' p _⟩,
rw [inter_eq_singleton_orthogonal_projection p] at hp,
symmetry,
exact hp }
end
@[simp] lemma orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : s) :
orthogonal_projection s p = p :=
begin
ext,
rw orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff,
exact p.2
end
/-- Orthogonal projection is idempotent. -/
@[simp] lemma orthogonal_projection_orthogonal_projection (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
orthogonal_projection s (orthogonal_projection s p) = orthogonal_projection s p :=
begin
ext,
rw orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff,
exact orthogonal_projection_mem p,
end
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_subspace {s s' : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[nonempty s'] [complete_space s.direction] [complete_space s'.direction] (h : s = s') (p : P) :
(orthogonal_projection s p : P) = (orthogonal_projection s' p : P) :=
begin
change orthogonal_projection_fn s p = orthogonal_projection_fn s' p,
congr,
exact h
end
/-- The distance to a point's orthogonal projection is 0 iff it lies in the subspace. -/
lemma dist_orthogonal_projection_eq_zero_iff {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p : P} :
dist p (orthogonal_projection s p) = 0 ↔ p ∈ s :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_zero, orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff]
/-- The distance between a point and its orthogonal projection is
nonzero if it does not lie in the subspace. -/
lemma dist_orthogonal_projection_ne_zero_of_not_mem {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p : P} (hp : p ∉ s) :
dist p (orthogonal_projection s p) ≠ 0 :=
mt dist_orthogonal_projection_eq_zero_iff.mp hp
/-- Subtracting `p` from its `orthogonal_projection` produces a result
in the orthogonal direction. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
(orthogonal_projection s p : P) -ᵥ p ∈ s.directionᗮ :=
orthogonal_projection_fn_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal p
/-- Subtracting the `orthogonal_projection` from `p` produces a result
in the orthogonal direction. -/
lemma vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction_orthogonal (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
p -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p ∈ s.directionᗮ :=
direction_mk' p s.directionᗮ ▸
vsub_mem_direction (self_mem_mk' _ _) (orthogonal_projection_mem_orthogonal s p)
/-- Subtracting the `orthogonal_projection` from `p` produces a result in the kernel of the linear
part of the orthogonal projection. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_vsub_orthogonal_projection (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
_root_.orthogonal_projection s.direction (p -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p) = 0 :=
begin
apply orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_complement_eq_zero,
intros c hc,
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, inner_neg_right,
(orthogonal_projection_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal s p c hc), neg_zero]
end
/-- Adding a vector to a point in the given subspace, then taking the
orthogonal projection, produces the original point if the vector was
in the orthogonal direction. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_vadd_eq_self {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) {v : V}
(hv : v ∈ s.directionᗮ) :
orthogonal_projection s (v +ᵥ p) = ⟨p, hp⟩ :=
begin
have h := vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction_orthogonal s (v +ᵥ p),
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, submodule.add_mem_iff_right _ hv] at h,
refine (eq_of_vsub_eq_zero _).symm,
ext,
refine submodule.disjoint_def.1 s.direction.orthogonal_disjoint _ _ h,
exact (_ : s.direction).2
end
/-- Adding a vector to a point in the given subspace, then taking the
orthogonal projection, produces the original point if the vector is a
multiple of the result of subtracting a point's orthogonal projection
from that point. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection {s : affine_subspace ℝ P}
[nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] {p1 : P} (p2 : P) (r : ℝ) (hp : p1 ∈ s) :
orthogonal_projection s (r • (p2 -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p2 : V) +ᵥ p1) = ⟨p1, hp⟩ :=
orthogonal_projection_vadd_eq_self hp
(submodule.smul_mem _ _ (vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction_orthogonal s _))
/-- The square of the distance from a point in `s` to `p2` equals the
sum of the squares of the distances of the two points to the
`orthogonal_projection`. -/
lemma dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq
{s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] {p1 : P}
(p2 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
dist p1 p2 * dist p1 p2 =
dist p1 (orthogonal_projection s p2) * dist p1 (orthogonal_projection s p2) +
dist p2 (orthogonal_projection s p2) * dist p2 (orthogonal_projection s p2) :=
begin
rw [dist_comm p2 _, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 _, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 _,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p2, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p1 (orthogonal_projection s p2) p2,
norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero],
exact submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal
(vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction p2 hp1)
(orthogonal_projection_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal s p2),
end
/-- The square of the distance between two points constructed by
adding multiples of the same orthogonal vector to points in the same
subspace. -/
lemma dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd {s : affine_subspace ℝ P}
{p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) (r1 r2 : ℝ) {v : V}
(hv : v ∈ s.directionᗮ) :
dist (r1 • v +ᵥ p1) (r2 • v +ᵥ p2) * dist (r1 • v +ᵥ p1) (r2 • v +ᵥ p2) =
dist p1 p2 * dist p1 p2 + (r1 - r2) * (r1 - r2) * (‖v‖ * ‖v‖) :=
calc dist (r1 • v +ᵥ p1) (r2 • v +ᵥ p2) * dist (r1 • v +ᵥ p1) (r2 • v +ᵥ p2)
= ‖(p1 -ᵥ p2) + (r1 - r2) • v‖ * ‖(p1 -ᵥ p2) + (r1 - r2) • v‖
: by rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (r1 • v +ᵥ p1), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, sub_smul,
add_comm, add_sub_assoc]
... = ‖p1 -ᵥ p2‖ * ‖p1 -ᵥ p2‖ + ‖(r1 - r2) • v‖ * ‖(r1 - r2) • v‖
: norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real
(submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal (vsub_mem_direction hp1 hp2)
(submodule.smul_mem _ _ hv))
... = ‖(p1 -ᵥ p2 : V)‖ * ‖(p1 -ᵥ p2 : V)‖ + |r1 - r2| * |r1 - r2| * ‖v‖ * ‖v‖
: by { rw [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs], ring }
... = dist p1 p2 * dist p1 p2 + (r1 - r2) * (r1 - r2) * (‖v‖ * ‖v‖)
: by { rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1, abs_mul_abs_self, mul_assoc] }
/-- Reflection in an affine subspace, which is expected to be nonempty
and complete. The word "reflection" is sometimes understood to mean
specifically reflection in a codimension-one subspace, and sometimes
more generally to cover operations such as reflection in a point. The
definition here, of reflection in an affine subspace, is a more
general sense of the word that includes both those common cases. -/
def reflection (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] :
P ≃ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P :=
affine_isometry_equiv.mk'
(λ p, (↑(orthogonal_projection s p) -ᵥ p) +ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p)
(_root_.reflection s.direction)
↑(classical.arbitrary s)
begin
intros p,
let v := p -ᵥ ↑(classical.arbitrary s),
let a : V := _root_.orthogonal_projection s.direction v,
let b : P := ↑(classical.arbitrary s),
have key : a +ᵥ b -ᵥ (v +ᵥ b) +ᵥ (a +ᵥ b) = a + a - v +ᵥ (b -ᵥ b +ᵥ b),
{ rw [← add_vadd, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd, vadd_vsub],
congr' 1,
abel },
have : p = v +ᵥ ↑(classical.arbitrary s) := (vsub_vadd p ↑(classical.arbitrary s)).symm,
simpa only [coe_vadd, reflection_apply, affine_map.map_vadd, orthogonal_projection_linear,
orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self, vadd_vsub, continuous_linear_map.coe_coe,
continuous_linear_equiv.coe_coe, this] using key,
end
/-- The result of reflecting. -/
lemma reflection_apply (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
reflection s p = (↑(orthogonal_projection s p) -ᵥ p) +ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p :=
rfl
lemma eq_reflection_of_eq_subspace {s s' : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[nonempty s'] [complete_space s.direction] [complete_space s'.direction] (h : s = s') (p : P) :
(reflection s p : P) = (reflection s' p : P) :=
by unfreezingI { subst h }
/-- Reflecting twice in the same subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma reflection_reflection (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] (p : P) :
reflection s (reflection s p) = p :=
begin
have : ∀ a : s, ∀ b : V, (_root_.orthogonal_projection s.direction) b = 0
→ reflection s (reflection s (b +ᵥ a)) = b +ᵥ a,
{ intros a b h,
have : (a:P) -ᵥ (b +ᵥ a) = - b,
{ rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self, zero_sub] },
simp [reflection, h, this] },
rw ← vsub_vadd p (orthogonal_projection s p),
exact this (orthogonal_projection s p) _ (orthogonal_projection_vsub_orthogonal_projection s p),
end
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp] lemma reflection_symm (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] :
(reflection s).symm = reflection s :=
by { ext, rw ← (reflection s).injective.eq_iff, simp }
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
lemma reflection_involutive (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] :
function.involutive (reflection s) :=
reflection_reflection s
/-- A point is its own reflection if and only if it is in the
subspace. -/
lemma reflection_eq_self_iff {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction]
(p : P) : reflection s p = p ↔ p ∈ s :=
begin
rw [←orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff, reflection_apply],
split,
{ intro h,
rw [←@vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub_assoc,
←two_smul ℝ (↑(orthogonal_projection s p) -ᵥ p), smul_eq_zero] at h,
norm_num at h,
exact h },
{ intro h,
simp [h] }
end
/-- Reflecting a point in two subspaces produces the same result if
and only if the point has the same orthogonal projection in each of
those subspaces. -/
lemma reflection_eq_iff_orthogonal_projection_eq (s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace ℝ P)
[nonempty s₁] [nonempty s₂] [complete_space s₁.direction] [complete_space s₂.direction] (p : P) :
reflection s₁ p = reflection s₂ p ↔
(orthogonal_projection s₁ p : P) = orthogonal_projection s₂ p :=
begin
rw [reflection_apply, reflection_apply],
split,
{ intro h,
rw [←@vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right,
←two_smul ℝ ((orthogonal_projection s₁ p : P) -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s₂ p),
smul_eq_zero] at h,
norm_num at h,
exact h },
{ intro h,
rw h }
end
/-- The distance between `p₁` and the reflection of `p₂` equals that
between the reflection of `p₁` and `p₂`. -/
lemma dist_reflection (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction]
(p₁ p₂ : P) :
dist p₁ (reflection s p₂) = dist (reflection s p₁) p₂ :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw ←reflection_reflection s p₁ },
exact (reflection s).dist_map _ _
end
/-- A point in the subspace is equidistant from another point and its
reflection. -/
lemma dist_reflection_eq_of_mem (s : affine_subspace ℝ P) [nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction]
{p₁ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ : P) :
dist p₁ (reflection s p₂) = dist p₁ p₂ :=
begin
rw ←reflection_eq_self_iff p₁ at hp₁,
convert (reflection s).dist_map p₁ p₂,
rw hp₁
end
/-- The reflection of a point in a subspace is contained in any larger
subspace containing both the point and the subspace reflected in. -/
lemma reflection_mem_of_le_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s₁]
[complete_space s₁.direction] (hle : s₁ ≤ s₂) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ s₂) : reflection s₁ p ∈ s₂ :=
begin
rw [reflection_apply],
have ho : ↑(orthogonal_projection s₁ p) ∈ s₂ := hle (orthogonal_projection_mem p),
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (vsub_mem_direction ho hp) ho
end
/-- Reflecting an orthogonal vector plus a point in the subspace
produces the negation of that vector plus the point. -/
lemma reflection_orthogonal_vadd {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) {v : V}
(hv : v ∈ s.directionᗮ) : reflection s (v +ᵥ p) = -v +ᵥ p :=
begin
rw [reflection_apply, orthogonal_projection_vadd_eq_self hp hv, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub],
simp
end
/-- Reflecting a vector plus a point in the subspace produces the
negation of that vector plus the point if the vector is a multiple of
the result of subtracting a point's orthogonal projection from that
point. -/
lemma reflection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p₁ : P} (p₂ : P) (r : ℝ) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) :
reflection s (r • (p₂ -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p₂) +ᵥ p₁) =
-(r • (p₂ -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p₂)) +ᵥ p₁ :=
reflection_orthogonal_vadd hp₁
(submodule.smul_mem _ _ (vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction_orthogonal s _))
omit V
variables (P)
/-- A `sphere P` bundles a `center` and `radius`. This definition does not require the radius to
be positive; that should be given as a hypothesis to lemmas that require it. -/
@[ext] structure sphere :=
(center : P)
(radius : ℝ)
variables {P}
instance [nonempty P] : nonempty (sphere P) := ⟨⟨classical.arbitrary P, 0⟩⟩
instance : has_coe (sphere P) (set P) := ⟨λ s, metric.sphere s.center s.radius⟩
instance : has_mem P (sphere P) := ⟨λ p s, p ∈ (s : set P)⟩
lemma sphere.mk_center (c : P) (r : ℝ) : (⟨c, r⟩ : sphere P).center = c := rfl
lemma sphere.mk_radius (c : P) (r : ℝ) : (⟨c, r⟩ : sphere P).radius = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma sphere.mk_center_radius (s : sphere P) : (⟨s.center, s.radius⟩ : sphere P) = s :=
by ext; refl
lemma sphere.coe_def (s : sphere P) : (s : set P) = metric.sphere s.center s.radius := rfl
@[simp] lemma sphere.coe_mk (c : P) (r : ℝ) : ↑(⟨c, r⟩ : sphere P) = metric.sphere c r := rfl
@[simp] lemma sphere.mem_coe {p : P} {s : sphere P} : p ∈ (s : set P) ↔ p ∈ s := iff.rfl
lemma mem_sphere {p : P} {s : sphere P} : p ∈ s ↔ dist p s.center = s.radius := iff.rfl
lemma mem_sphere' {p : P} {s : sphere P} : p ∈ s ↔ dist s.center p = s.radius :=
metric.mem_sphere'
lemma subset_sphere {ps : set P} {s : sphere P} : ps ⊆ s ↔ ∀ p ∈ ps, p ∈ s := iff.rfl
lemma dist_of_mem_subset_sphere {p : P} {ps : set P} {s : sphere P} (hp : p ∈ ps)
(hps : ps ⊆ (s : set P)) : dist p s.center = s.radius :=
mem_sphere.1 (sphere.mem_coe.1 (set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp hps))
lemma dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere {p c : P} {ps : set P} {r : ℝ} (hp : p ∈ ps)
(hps : ps ⊆ ↑(⟨c, r⟩ : sphere P)) : dist p c = r :=
dist_of_mem_subset_sphere hp hps
lemma sphere.ne_iff {s₁ s₂ : sphere P} :
s₁ ≠ s₂ ↔ s₁.center ≠ s₂.center ∨ s₁.radius ≠ s₂.radius :=
by rw [←not_and_distrib, ←sphere.ext_iff]
lemma sphere.center_eq_iff_eq_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : sphere P} {p : P} (hs₁ : p ∈ s₁) (hs₂ : p ∈ s₂) :
s₁.center = s₂.center ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, sphere.ext _ _ h _, λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩,
rw mem_sphere at hs₁ hs₂,
rw [←hs₁, ←hs₂, h]
end
lemma sphere.center_ne_iff_ne_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : sphere P} {p : P} (hs₁ : p ∈ s₁) (hs₂ : p ∈ s₂) :
s₁.center ≠ s₂.center ↔ s₁ ≠ s₂ :=
(sphere.center_eq_iff_eq_of_mem hs₁ hs₂).not
lemma dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere {p₁ p₂ : P} {s : sphere P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : dist p₁ s.center = dist p₂ s.center :=
by rw [mem_sphere.1 hp₁, mem_sphere.1 hp₂]
lemma dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere' {p₁ p₂ : P} {s : sphere P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : dist s.center p₁ = dist s.center p₂ :=
by rw [mem_sphere'.1 hp₁, mem_sphere'.1 hp₂]
/-- A set of points is cospherical if they are equidistant from some
point. In two dimensions, this is the same thing as being
concyclic. -/
def cospherical (ps : set P) : Prop :=
∃ (center : P) (radius : ℝ), ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius
/-- The definition of `cospherical`. -/
lemma cospherical_def (ps : set P) :
cospherical ps ↔ ∃ (center : P) (radius : ℝ), ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius :=
iff.rfl
/-- A set of points is cospherical if and only if they lie in some sphere. -/
lemma cospherical_iff_exists_sphere {ps : set P} :
cospherical ps ↔ ∃ s : sphere P, ps ⊆ (s : set P) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with ⟨c, r, h⟩,
exact ⟨⟨c, r⟩, h⟩ },
{ rcases h with ⟨s, h⟩,
exact ⟨s.center, s.radius, h⟩ }
end
/-- The set of points in a sphere is cospherical. -/
lemma sphere.cospherical (s : sphere P) : cospherical (s : set P) :=
cospherical_iff_exists_sphere.2 ⟨s, set.subset.rfl⟩
/-- A subset of a cospherical set is cospherical. -/
lemma cospherical.subset {ps₁ ps₂ : set P} (hs : ps₁ ⊆ ps₂) (hc : cospherical ps₂) :
cospherical ps₁ :=
begin
rcases hc with ⟨c, r, hcr⟩,
exact ⟨c, r, λ p hp, hcr p (hs hp)⟩
end
include V
/-- The empty set is cospherical. -/
lemma cospherical_empty : cospherical (∅ : set P) :=
begin
use add_torsor.nonempty.some,
simp,
end
omit V
/-- A single point is cospherical. -/
lemma cospherical_singleton (p : P) : cospherical ({p} : set P) :=
begin
use p,
simp
end
include V
/-- Two points are cospherical. -/
lemma cospherical_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : cospherical ({p₁, p₂} : set P) :=
begin
use [(2⁻¹ : ℝ) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₁, (2⁻¹ : ℝ) * (dist p₂ p₁)],
intro p,
rw [set.mem_insert_iff, set.mem_singleton_iff],
rintro ⟨_|_⟩,
{ rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self, zero_sub, norm_neg, norm_smul,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₂],
simp },
{ rw [H, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₂, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₂],
conv_lhs { congr, congr, rw ←one_smul ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁ : V) },
rw [←sub_smul, norm_smul],
norm_num }
end
/-- Any three points in a cospherical set are affinely independent. -/
lemma cospherical.affine_independent {s : set P} (hs : cospherical s) {p : fin 3 → P}
(hps : set.range p ⊆ s) (hpi : function.injective p) :
affine_independent ℝ p :=
begin
rw affine_independent_iff_not_collinear,
intro hc,
rw collinear_iff_of_mem (set.mem_range_self (0 : fin 3)) at hc,
rcases hc with ⟨v, hv⟩,
rw set.forall_range_iff at hv,
have hv0 : v ≠ 0,
{ intro h,
have he : p 1 = p 0, by simpa [h] using hv 1,
exact (dec_trivial : (1 : fin 3) ≠ 0) (hpi he) },
rcases hs with ⟨c, r, hs⟩,
have hs' := λ i, hs (p i) (set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (set.mem_range_self _) hps),
choose f hf using hv,
have hsd : ∀ i, dist ((f i • v) +ᵥ p 0) c = r,
{ intro i,
rw ←hf,
exact hs' i },
have hf0 : f 0 = 0,
{ have hf0' := hf 0,
rw [eq_comm, ←@vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, smul_eq_zero] at hf0',
simpa [hv0] using hf0' },
have hfi : function.injective f,
{ intros i j h,
have hi := hf i,
rw [h, ←hf j] at hi,
exact hpi hi },
simp_rw [←hsd 0, hf0, zero_smul, zero_vadd, dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist (p 0) c hv0] at hsd,
have hfn0 : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → f i ≠ 0 := λ i, (hfi.ne_iff' hf0).2,
have hfn0' : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → f i = (-2) * ⟪v, (p 0 -ᵥ c)⟫ / ⟪v, v⟫,
{ intros i hi,
have hsdi := hsd i,
simpa [hfn0, hi] using hsdi },
have hf12 : f 1 = f 2, { rw [hfn0' 1 dec_trivial, hfn0' 2 dec_trivial] },
exact (dec_trivial : (1 : fin 3) ≠ 2) (hfi hf12)
end
/-- Suppose that `p₁` and `p₂` lie in spheres `s₁` and `s₂`. Then the vector between the centers
of those spheres is orthogonal to that between `p₁` and `p₂`; this is a version of
`inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq` for bundled spheres. (In two dimensions, this says that
the diagonals of a kite are orthogonal.) -/
lemma inner_vsub_vsub_of_mem_sphere_of_mem_sphere {p₁ p₂ : P} {s₁ s₂ : sphere P}
(hp₁s₁ : p₁ ∈ s₁) (hp₂s₁ : p₂ ∈ s₁) (hp₁s₂ : p₁ ∈ s₂) (hp₂s₂ : p₂ ∈ s₂) :
⟪s₂.center -ᵥ s₁.center, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq (dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere hp₁s₁ hp₂s₁)
(dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere hp₁s₂ hp₂s₂)
/-- Two spheres intersect in at most two points in a two-dimensional subspace containing their
centers; this is a version of `eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two` for bundled
spheres. -/
lemma eq_of_mem_sphere_of_mem_sphere_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two {s : affine_subspace ℝ P}
[finite_dimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = 2) {s₁ s₂ : sphere P}
{p₁ p₂ p : P} (hs₁ : s₁.center ∈ s) (hs₂ : s₂.center ∈ s) (hp₁s : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂s : p₂ ∈ s)
(hps : p ∈ s) (hs : s₁ ≠ s₂) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁s₁ : p₁ ∈ s₁) (hp₂s₁ : p₂ ∈ s₁) (hps₁ : p ∈ s₁)
(hp₁s₂ : p₁ ∈ s₂) (hp₂s₂ : p₂ ∈ s₂) (hps₂ : p ∈ s₂) : p = p₁ ∨ p = p₂ :=
eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two hd hs₁ hs₂ hp₁s hp₂s hps
((sphere.center_ne_iff_ne_of_mem hps₁ hps₂).2 hs) hp hp₁s₁ hp₂s₁ hps₁ hp₁s₂ hp₂s₂ hps₂
/-- Two spheres intersect in at most two points in two-dimensional space; this is a version of
`eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_finrank_eq_two` for bundled spheres. -/
lemma eq_of_mem_sphere_of_mem_sphere_of_finrank_eq_two [finite_dimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = 2) {s₁ s₂ : sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p : P} (hs : s₁ ≠ s₂) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂)
(hp₁s₁ : p₁ ∈ s₁) (hp₂s₁ : p₂ ∈ s₁) (hps₁ : p ∈ s₁) (hp₁s₂ : p₁ ∈ s₂) (hp₂s₂ : p₂ ∈ s₂)
(hps₂ : p ∈ s₂) : p = p₁ ∨ p = p₂ :=
eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_finrank_eq_two hd ((sphere.center_ne_iff_ne_of_mem hps₁ hps₂).2 hs)
hp hp₁s₁ hp₂s₁ hps₁ hp₁s₂ hp₂s₂ hps₂
/-- A set of points is concyclic if it is cospherical and coplanar. (Most results are stated
directly in terms of `cospherical` instead of using `concyclic`.) -/
structure concyclic (ps : set P) : Prop :=
(cospherical : cospherical ps)
(coplanar : coplanar ℝ ps)
/-- A subset of a concyclic set is concyclic. -/
lemma concyclic.subset {ps₁ ps₂ : set P} (hs : ps₁ ⊆ ps₂) (h : concyclic ps₂) : concyclic ps₁ :=
⟨h.1.subset hs, h.2.subset hs⟩
/-- The empty set is concyclic. -/
lemma concyclic_empty : concyclic (∅ : set P) :=
⟨cospherical_empty, coplanar_empty ℝ P⟩
/-- A single point is concyclic. -/
lemma concyclic_singleton (p : P) : concyclic ({p} : set P) :=
⟨cospherical_singleton p, coplanar_singleton ℝ p⟩
/-- Two points are concyclic. -/
lemma concyclic_pair (p₁ p₂ : P) : concyclic ({p₁, p₂} : set P) :=
⟨cospherical_pair p₁ p₂, coplanar_pair ℝ p₁ p₂⟩
end euclidean_geometry
|
fdd829f86cba93b67264b19be004acc2b323b51c | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/tactic/omega/coeffs.lean | 769ca23c08e6bee8458443d8abf2ff2619521dd9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,603 | lean | /- Copyright (c) 2019 Seul Baek. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Seul Baek
Non-constant terms of linear constraints are represented
by storing their coefficients in integer lists. -/
import data.list.func
import tactic.ring
import tactic.omega.misc
namespace omega
namespace coeffs
open list.func
variable {v : nat → int}
/-- `val_between v as l o` is the value (under valuation `v`) of the term
obtained taking the term represented by `(0, as)` and dropping all
subterms that include variables outside the range `[l,l+o)` -/
@[simp] def val_between (v : nat → int) (as : list int) (l : nat) : nat → int
| 0 := 0
| (o+1) := (val_between o) + (get (l+o) as * v (l+o))
@[simp] lemma val_between_nil {l : nat} :
∀ m, val_between v [] l m = 0
| 0 := by simp only [val_between]
| (m+1) :=
by simp only [val_between_nil m, omega.coeffs.val_between,
get_nil, zero_add, zero_mul, int.default_eq_zero]
/-- Evaluation of the nonconstant component of a normalized linear arithmetic term. -/
def val (v : nat → int) (as : list int) : int :=
val_between v as 0 as.length
@[simp] lemma val_nil : val v [] = 0 := rfl
lemma val_between_eq_of_le {as : list int} {l : nat} :
∀ m, as.length ≤ l + m →
val_between v as l m = val_between v as l (as.length - l)
| 0 h1 :=
begin rw (nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.elim_right _), apply h1 end
| (m+1) h1 :=
begin
rw le_iff_eq_or_lt at h1, cases h1,
{ rw [h1, add_comm l, nat.add_sub_cancel] },
have h2 : list.length as ≤ l + m,
{ rw ← nat.lt_succ_iff, apply h1 },
simpa [ get_eq_default_of_le _ h2, zero_mul, add_zero,
val_between ] using val_between_eq_of_le _ h2
end
lemma val_eq_of_le {as : list int} {k : nat} :
as.length ≤ k → val v as = val_between v as 0 k :=
begin
intro h1, unfold val,
rw [val_between_eq_of_le k _], refl,
rw zero_add, exact h1
end
lemma val_between_eq_val_between
{v w : nat → int} {as bs : list int} {l : nat} :
∀ {m}, (∀ x, l ≤ x → x < l + m → v x = w x) →
(∀ x, l ≤ x → x < l + m → get x as = get x bs) →
val_between v as l m = val_between w bs l m
| 0 h1 h2 := rfl
| (m+1) h1 h2 :=
begin
unfold val_between,
have h3 : l + m < l + (m + 1),
{ rw ← add_assoc, apply lt_add_one },
apply fun_mono_2,
apply val_between_eq_val_between; intros x h4 h5,
{ apply h1 _ h4 (lt_trans h5 h3) },
{ apply h2 _ h4 (lt_trans h5 h3) },
rw [h1 _ _ h3, h2 _ _ h3];
apply nat.le_add_right
end
open_locale list.func
lemma val_between_set {a : int} {l n : nat} :
∀ {m}, l ≤ n → n < l + m → val_between v ([] {n ↦ a}) l m = a * v n
| 0 h1 h2 :=
begin exfalso, apply lt_irrefl l (lt_of_le_of_lt h1 h2) end
| (m+1) h1 h2 :=
begin
rw [← add_assoc, nat.lt_succ_iff, le_iff_eq_or_lt] at h2,
cases h2; unfold val_between,
{ have h3 : val_between v ([] {l + m ↦ a}) l m = 0,
{ apply @eq.trans _ _ (val_between v [] l m),
{ apply val_between_eq_val_between,
{ intros, refl },
{ intros x h4 h5, rw [get_nil,
get_set_eq_of_ne, get_nil],
apply ne_of_lt h5 } },
apply val_between_nil },
rw h2,
simp only [h3, zero_add, list.func.get_set] },
{ have h3 : l + m ≠ n,
{ apply ne_of_gt h2 },
rw [@val_between_set m h1 h2, get_set_eq_of_ne _ _ h3],
simp only [h3, get_nil, add_zero, zero_mul, int.default_eq_zero] }
end
@[simp] lemma val_set {m : nat} {a : int} :
val v ([] {m ↦ a}) = a * v m :=
begin
apply val_between_set, apply zero_le,
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _),
simp only [length_set, zero_add, le_max_right],
end
lemma val_between_neg {as : list int} {l : nat} :
∀ {o}, val_between v (neg as) l o = -(val_between v as l o)
| 0 := rfl
| (o+1) :=
begin
unfold val_between,
rw [neg_add, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul],
apply fun_mono_2,
apply val_between_neg,
apply fun_mono_2 _ rfl,
apply get_neg
end
@[simp] lemma val_neg {as : list int} :
val v (neg as) = -(val v as) :=
by simpa only [val, length_neg] using val_between_neg
lemma val_between_add {is js : list int} {l : nat} :
∀ m, val_between v (add is js) l m =
(val_between v is l m) + (val_between v js l m)
| 0 := rfl
| (m+1) :=
by { simp only [val_between, val_between_add m,
list.func.get, get_add], ring }
@[simp] lemma val_add {is js : list int} :
val v (add is js) = (val v is) + (val v js) :=
begin
unfold val,
rw val_between_add, apply fun_mono_2;
apply val_between_eq_of_le;
rw [zero_add, length_add],
apply le_max_left, apply le_max_right
end
lemma val_between_sub {is js : list int} {l : nat} :
∀ m, val_between v (sub is js) l m =
(val_between v is l m) - (val_between v js l m)
| 0 := rfl
| (m+1) :=
by { simp only [val_between, val_between_sub m,
list.func.get, get_sub], ring }
@[simp] lemma val_sub {is js : list int} :
val v (sub is js) = (val v is) - (val v js) :=
begin
unfold val,
rw val_between_sub,
apply fun_mono_2;
apply val_between_eq_of_le;
rw [zero_add, length_sub],
apply le_max_left,
apply le_max_right
end
/-- `val_except k v as` is the value (under valuation `v`) of the term
obtained taking the term represented by `(0, as)` and dropping the
subterm that includes the `k`th variable. -/
def val_except (k : nat) (v : nat → int) (as) :=
val_between v as 0 k + val_between v as (k+1) (as.length - (k+1))
lemma val_except_eq_val_except
{k : nat} {is js : list int} {v w : nat → int} :
(∀ x ≠ k, v x = w x) → (∀ x ≠ k, get x is = get x js) →
val_except k v is = val_except k w js :=
begin
intros h1 h2, unfold val_except,
apply fun_mono_2,
{ apply val_between_eq_val_between;
intros x h3 h4;
[ {apply h1}, {apply h2} ];
apply ne_of_lt;
rw zero_add at h4;
apply h4 },
{ repeat { rw ← val_between_eq_of_le
((max is.length js.length) - (k+1)) },
{ apply val_between_eq_val_between;
intros x h3 h4;
[ {apply h1}, {apply h2} ];
apply ne.symm;
apply ne_of_lt;
rw nat.lt_iff_add_one_le;
exact h3 },
repeat { rw add_comm,
apply le_trans _ (nat.le_sub_add _ _),
{ apply le_max_right <|> apply le_max_left } } }
end
open_locale omega
lemma val_except_update_set
{n : nat} {as : list int} {i j : int} :
val_except n (v⟨n ↦ i⟩) (as {n ↦ j}) = val_except n v as :=
by apply val_except_eq_val_except update_eq_of_ne (get_set_eq_of_ne _)
lemma val_between_add_val_between {as : list int} {l m : nat} :
∀ {n}, val_between v as l m + val_between v as (l+m) n =
val_between v as l (m+n)
| 0 := by simp only [val_between, add_zero]
| (n+1) :=
begin
rw ← add_assoc,
unfold val_between,
rw add_assoc,
rw ← @val_between_add_val_between n,
ring,
end
lemma val_except_add_eq (n : nat) {as : list int} :
(val_except n v as) + ((get n as) * (v n)) = val v as :=
begin
unfold val_except, unfold val,
by_cases h1 : n + 1 ≤ as.length,
{ have h4 := @val_between_add_val_between v as 0 (n+1) (as.length - (n+1)),
have h5 : n + 1 + (as.length - (n + 1)) = as.length,
{ rw [add_comm, nat.sub_add_cancel h1] },
rw h5 at h4, apply eq.trans _ h4,
simp only [val_between, zero_add], ring },
have h2 : (list.length as - (n + 1)) = 0,
{ apply nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le
(le_trans (not_lt.1 h1) (nat.le_add_right _ _)) },
have h3 : val_between v as 0 (list.length as) =
val_between v as 0 (n + 1),
{ simpa only [val] using @val_eq_of_le v as (n+1)
(le_trans (not_lt.1 h1) (nat.le_add_right _ _)) },
simp only [add_zero, val_between, zero_add, h2, h3]
end
@[simp] lemma val_between_map_mul {i : int} {as: list int} {l : nat} :
∀ {m}, val_between v (list.map ((*) i) as) l m = i * val_between v as l m
| 0 := by simp only [val_between, mul_zero, list.map]
| (m+1) :=
begin
unfold val_between,
rw [@val_between_map_mul m, mul_add],
apply fun_mono_2 rfl,
by_cases h1 : l + m < as.length,
{ rw [get_map h1, mul_assoc] },
rw not_lt at h1,
rw [get_eq_default_of_le, get_eq_default_of_le];
try {simp}; apply h1
end
lemma forall_val_dvd_of_forall_mem_dvd {i : int} {as : list int} :
(∀ x ∈ as, i ∣ x) → (∀ n, i ∣ get n as) | h1 n :=
by { apply forall_val_of_forall_mem _ h1,
apply dvd_zero }
lemma dvd_val_between {i} {as: list int} {l : nat} :
∀ {m}, (∀ x ∈ as, i ∣ x) → (i ∣ val_between v as l m)
| 0 h1 := dvd_zero _
| (m+1) h1 :=
begin
unfold val_between,
apply dvd_add,
apply dvd_val_between h1,
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left,
by_cases h2 : get (l+m) as = 0,
{ rw h2, apply dvd_zero },
apply h1, apply mem_get_of_ne_zero h2
end
lemma dvd_val {as : list int} {i : int} :
(∀ x ∈ as, i ∣ x) → (i ∣ val v as) := by apply dvd_val_between
@[simp] lemma val_between_map_div
{as: list int} {i : int} {l : nat} (h1 : ∀ x ∈ as, i ∣ x) :
∀ {m}, val_between v (list.map (λ x, x / i) as) l m = (val_between v as l m) / i
| 0 := by simp only [int.zero_div, val_between, list.map]
| (m+1) :=
begin
unfold val_between,
rw [@val_between_map_div m, int.add_div_of_dvd (dvd_val_between h1)],
apply fun_mono_2 rfl,
{ apply calc get (l + m) (list.map (λ (x : ℤ), x / i) as) * v (l + m)
= ((get (l + m) as) / i) * v (l + m) :
begin
apply fun_mono_2 _ rfl,
rw get_map',
apply int.zero_div
end
... = get (l + m) as * v (l + m) / i :
begin
repeat {rw mul_comm _ (v (l+m))},
rw int.mul_div_assoc,
apply forall_val_dvd_of_forall_mem_dvd h1
end },
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left,
apply forall_val_dvd_of_forall_mem_dvd h1,
end
@[simp] lemma val_map_div {as : list int} {i : int} :
(∀ x ∈ as, i ∣ x) → val v (list.map (λ x, x / i) as) = (val v as) / i :=
by {intro h1, simpa only [val, list.length_map] using val_between_map_div h1}
lemma val_between_eq_zero {is: list int} {l : nat} :
∀ {m}, (∀ x : int, x ∈ is → x = 0) → val_between v is l m = 0
| 0 h1 := rfl
| (m+1) h1 :=
begin
have h2 := @forall_val_of_forall_mem _ _ is (λ x, x = 0) rfl h1,
simpa only [val_between, h2 (l+m), zero_mul, add_zero]
using @val_between_eq_zero m h1,
end
lemma val_eq_zero {is : list int} :
(∀ x : int, x ∈ is → x = 0) → val v is = 0 :=
by apply val_between_eq_zero
end coeffs
end omega
|
576e55cbd7dee927fa3dded6f8fd063cd1630403 | abd85493667895c57a7507870867b28124b3998f | /src/data/real/cau_seq.lean | 15b55497af7825d61bbe3ac55c6861d4701a228e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pechersky/mathlib | d56eef16bddb0bfc8bc552b05b7270aff5944393 | f1df14c2214ee114c9738e733efd5de174deb95d | refs/heads/master | 1,666,714,392,571 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 270,557,274 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,591,597,975,000 | 1,591,597,974,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,856 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.big_operators
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `is_absolute_value`: a type class stating that `f : β → α` satisfies the axioms of an abs val
* `is_cau_seq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
/-- A function f is an absolute value if it is nonnegative, zero only at 0, additive, and
multiplicative. -/
class is_absolute_value {α} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β} [ring β] (f : β → α) : Prop :=
(abv_nonneg [] : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x)
(abv_eq_zero [] : ∀ {x}, f x = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(abv_add [] : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y)
(abv_mul [] : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
namespace is_absolute_value
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem abv_zero : abv 0 = 0 := (abv_eq_zero abv).2 rfl
theorem abv_one' (h : (1:β) ≠ 0) : abv 1 = 1 :=
(domain.mul_right_inj $ mt (abv_eq_zero abv).1 h).1 $
by rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_one, mul_one]
theorem abv_one
{β : Type*} [domain β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv] :
abv 1 = 1 := abv_one' abv one_ne_zero
theorem abv_pos {a : β} : 0 < abv a ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, ne, eq_comm]; simp [abv_eq_zero abv, abv_nonneg abv]
theorem abv_neg (a : β) : abv (-a) = abv a :=
by rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _),
← abv_mul abv, ← abv_mul abv]; simp
theorem abv_sub (a b : β) : abv (a - b) = abv (b - a) :=
by rw [← neg_sub, abv_neg abv]
theorem abv_inv
{β : Type*} [field β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
(a : β) : abv a⁻¹ = (abv a)⁻¹ :=
classical.by_cases
(λ h : a = 0, by simp [h, abv_zero abv])
(λ h, (domain.mul_left_inj (mt (abv_eq_zero abv).1 h)).1 $
by rw [← abv_mul abv]; simp [h, mt (abv_eq_zero abv).1 h, abv_one abv])
theorem abv_div
{β : Type*} [field β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
(a b : β) : abv (a / b) = abv a / abv b :=
by rw [division_def, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv]; refl
lemma abv_sub_le (a b c : β) : abv (a - c) ≤ abv (a - b) + abv (b - c) :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] using abv_add abv (a - b) (b - c)
lemma sub_abv_le_abv_sub (a b : β) : abv a - abv b ≤ abv (a - b) :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ by simpa using abv_add abv (a - b) b
lemma abs_abv_sub_le_abv_sub (a b : β) :
abs (abv a - abv b) ≤ abv (a - b) :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨sub_abv_le_abv_sub abv _ _,
by rw abv_sub abv; apply sub_abv_le_abv_sub abv⟩
lemma abv_pow {β : Type*} [domain β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
(a : β) (n : ℕ) : abv (a ^ n) = abv a ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [abv_mul abv, pow_succ, abv_one abv, *]
end is_absolute_value
instance abs_is_absolute_value {α} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α] :
is_absolute_value (abs : α → α) :=
{ abv_nonneg := abs_nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := λ _, abs_eq_zero,
abv_add := abs_add,
abv_mul := abs_mul }
open is_absolute_value
theorem exists_forall_ge_and {α} [linear_order α] {P Q : α → Prop} :
(∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, P j) → (∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, Q j) →
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, P j ∧ Q j
| ⟨a, h₁⟩ ⟨b, h₂⟩ := let ⟨c, ac, bc⟩ := exists_ge_of_linear a b in
⟨c, λ j hj, ⟨h₁ _ (le_trans ac hj), h₂ _ (le_trans bc hj)⟩⟩
section
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma
{ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β},
abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂,
by simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma
{ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ →
abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε :=
begin
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _),
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0,
refine ⟨_, εK, λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂, _⟩,
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _)),
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _)),
have := add_lt_add
(mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt h₁) hb₂ (abv_nonneg abv _) εK)
(mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt h₂) ha₁ (abv_nonneg abv _) εK),
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this,
simpa [mul_add, add_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
end
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma
{β : Type*} [field β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b →
abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε :=
begin
have KK := mul_pos K0 K0,
have εK := mul_pos ε0 KK,
refine ⟨_, εK, λ a b ha hb h, _⟩,
have a0 := lt_of_lt_of_le K0 ha,
have b0 := lt_of_lt_of_le K0 hb,
rw [inv_sub_inv ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0),
abv_div abv, abv_mul abv, mul_comm, abv_sub abv,
← mul_div_cancel ε (ne_of_gt KK)],
exact div_lt_div h
(mul_le_mul hb ha (le_of_lt K0) (abv_nonneg abv _))
(le_of_lt $ mul_pos ε0 KK) KK
end
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
def is_cau_seq {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] (abv : β → α) (f : ℕ → β) :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε
namespace is_cau_seq
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv] {f : ℕ → β}
theorem cauchy₂ (hf : is_cau_seq abv f) {ε:α} (ε0 : ε > 0) :
∃ i, ∀ j k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε :=
begin
refine (hf _ (half_pos ε0)).imp (λ i hi j k ij ik, _),
rw ← add_halves ε,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sub_le abv _ _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij) _),
rw abv_sub abv, exact hi _ ik
end
theorem cauchy₃ (hf : is_cau_seq abv f) {ε:α} (ε0 : ε > 0) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
let ⟨i, H⟩ := hf.cauchy₂ ε0 in ⟨i, λ j ij k jk, H _ _ (le_trans ij jk) ij⟩
end is_cau_seq
def cau_seq {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
(β : Type*) [ring β] (abv : β → α) :=
{f : ℕ → β // is_cau_seq abv f}
namespace cau_seq
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
section ring
variables {β : Type*} [ring β] {abv : β → α}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨_, subtype.val⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_to_fun (f) (hf : is_cau_seq abv f) :
@coe_fn (cau_seq β abv) _ ⟨f, hf⟩ = f := rfl
theorem ext {f g : cau_seq β abv} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
subtype.eq (funext h)
theorem is_cau (f : cau_seq β abv) : is_cau_seq abv f := f.2
theorem cauchy (f : cau_seq β abv) :
∀ {ε}, ε > 0 → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε := f.2
def of_eq (f : cau_seq β abv) (g : ℕ → β) (e : ∀ i, f i = g i) : cau_seq β abv :=
⟨g, λ ε, by rw [show g = f, from (funext e).symm]; exact f.cauchy⟩
variable [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem cauchy₂ (f : cau_seq β abv) {ε:α} : ε > 0 →
∃ i, ∀ j k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε := f.2.cauchy₂
theorem cauchy₃ (f : cau_seq β abv) {ε:α} : ε > 0 →
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε := f.2.cauchy₃
theorem bounded (f : cau_seq β abv) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
begin
cases f.cauchy zero_lt_one with i h,
let R := (finset.range (i+1)).sum (λ j, abv (f j)),
have : ∀ j ≤ i, abv (f j) ≤ R,
{ intros j ij, change (λ j, abv (f j)) j ≤ R,
apply finset.single_le_sum,
{ intros, apply abv_nonneg abv },
{ rwa [finset.mem_range, nat.lt_succ_iff] } },
refine ⟨R + 1, λ j, _⟩,
cases lt_or_le j i with ij ij,
{ exact lt_of_le_of_lt (this _ (le_of_lt ij)) (lt_add_one _) },
{ have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _)
(add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (this _ (le_refl _)) (h _ ij)),
rw [add_sub, add_comm] at this, simpa }
end
theorem bounded' (f : cau_seq β abv) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
let ⟨r, h⟩ := f.bounded in
⟨max r (x+1), lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _) (le_max_right _ _),
λ i, lt_of_lt_of_le (h i) (le_max_left _ _)⟩
instance : has_add (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨λ i, (f i + g i : β), λ ε ε0,
let ⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abv ε0,
⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ δ0) (g.cauchy₃ δ0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ (le_refl _) in Hδ (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem add_apply (f g : cau_seq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f + g) i = f i + g i := rfl
variable (abv)
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence. -/
def const (x : β) : cau_seq β abv :=
⟨λ i, x, λ ε ε0, ⟨0, λ j ij, by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩⟩
variable {abv}
local notation `const` := const abv
@[simp] theorem const_apply (x : β) (i : ℕ) : (const x : ℕ → β) i = x := rfl
theorem const_inj {x y : β} : (const x : cau_seq β abv) = const y ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, congr_arg (λ f:cau_seq β abv, (f:ℕ→β) 0) h, congr_arg _⟩
instance : has_zero (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨const 0⟩
instance : has_one (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨const 1⟩
instance : inhabited (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_apply (i) : (0 : cau_seq β abv) i = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_apply (i) : (1 : cau_seq β abv) i = 1 := rfl
theorem const_add (x y : β) : const (x + y) = const x + const y :=
ext $ λ i, rfl
instance : has_mul (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨λ i, (f i * g i : β), λ ε ε0,
let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0, ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0,
⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abv ε0,
⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ δ0) (g.cauchy₃ δ0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ (le_refl _) in
Hδ (hF j) (hG i) (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_apply (f g : cau_seq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f * g) i = f i * g i := rfl
theorem const_mul (x y : β) : const (x * y) = const x * const y :=
ext $ λ i, rfl
instance : has_neg (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f, of_eq (const (-1) * f) (λ x, -f x) (λ i, by simp)⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_apply (f : cau_seq β abv) (i) : (-f) i = -f i := rfl
theorem const_neg (x : β) : const (-x) = -const x :=
ext $ λ i, rfl
instance : ring (cau_seq β abv) :=
by refine {neg := has_neg.neg, add := (+), zero := 0, mul := (*), one := 1, ..};
{ intros, apply ext, simp [mul_add, mul_assoc, add_mul, add_comm, add_left_comm] }
instance {β : Type*} [comm_ring β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv] :
comm_ring (cau_seq β abv) :=
{ mul_comm := by intros; apply ext; simp [mul_left_comm, mul_comm],
..cau_seq.ring }
theorem const_sub (x y : β) : const (x - y) = const x - const y :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, const_add, const_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] theorem sub_apply (f g : cau_seq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f - g) i = f i - g i := rfl
/-- `lim_zero f` holds when `f` approaches 0. -/
def lim_zero (f : cau_seq β abv) := ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j) < ε
theorem add_lim_zero {f g : cau_seq β abv}
(hf : lim_zero f) (hg : lim_zero g) : lim_zero (f + g)
| ε ε0 := (exists_forall_ge_and
(hf _ $ half_pos ε0) (hg _ $ half_pos ε0)).imp $
λ i H j ij, let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij in
by simpa [add_halves ε] using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add H₁ H₂)
theorem mul_lim_zero_right (f : cau_seq β abv) {g}
(hg : lim_zero g) : lim_zero (f * g)
| ε ε0 := let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0 in
(hg _ $ div_pos ε0 F0).imp $ λ i H j ij,
by have := mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt $ hF j) (H _ ij) (abv_nonneg abv _) F0;
rwa [mul_comm F, div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_gt F0), ← abv_mul abv] at this
theorem mul_lim_zero_left {f} (g : cau_seq β abv)
(hg : lim_zero f) : lim_zero (f * g)
| ε ε0 := let ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0 in
(hg _ $ div_pos ε0 G0).imp $ λ i H j ij,
by have := mul_lt_mul'' (H _ ij) (hG j) (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _);
rwa [div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_gt G0), ← abv_mul abv] at this
theorem neg_lim_zero {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf : lim_zero f) : lim_zero (-f) :=
by rw ← neg_one_mul; exact mul_lim_zero_right _ hf
theorem sub_lim_zero {f g : cau_seq β abv}
(hf : lim_zero f) (hg : lim_zero g) : lim_zero (f - g) :=
add_lim_zero hf (neg_lim_zero hg)
theorem lim_zero_sub_rev {f g : cau_seq β abv} (hfg : lim_zero (f - g)) : lim_zero (g - f) :=
by simpa using neg_lim_zero hfg
theorem zero_lim_zero : lim_zero (0 : cau_seq β abv)
| ε ε0 := ⟨0, λ j ij, by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_lim_zero {x : β} : lim_zero (const x) ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ H, (abv_eq_zero abv).1 $
eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense (abv_nonneg abv _) $
λ ε ε0, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := H _ ε0 in le_of_lt $ hi _ (le_refl _),
λ e, e.symm ▸ zero_lim_zero⟩
instance equiv : setoid (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f g, lim_zero (f - g),
⟨λ f, by simp [zero_lim_zero],
λ f g h, by simpa using neg_lim_zero h,
λ f g h fg gh, by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] using add_lim_zero fg gh⟩⟩
theorem equiv_def₃ {f g : cau_seq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) {ε:α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - g j) < ε :=
(exists_forall_ge_and (h _ $ half_pos ε0) (f.cauchy₃ $ half_pos ε0)).imp $
λ i H j ij k jk, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := H _ ij in
by have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv (f j - g j) _) (add_lt_add h₁ (h₂ _ jk));
rwa [sub_add_sub_cancel', add_halves] at this
theorem lim_zero_congr {f g : cau_seq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : lim_zero f ↔ lim_zero g :=
⟨λ l, by simpa using add_lim_zero (setoid.symm h) l,
λ l, by simpa using add_lim_zero h l⟩
theorem abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf : ¬ lim_zero f) :
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ abv (f j) :=
begin
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
by_contra nk,
refine hf (λ ε ε0, _),
simp [not_forall] at nk,
cases f.cauchy₃ (half_pos ε0) with i hi,
rcases nk _ (half_pos ε0) i with ⟨j, ij, hj⟩,
refine ⟨j, λ k jk, _⟩,
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi j ij k jk) hj),
rwa [sub_add_cancel, add_halves] at this
end
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → β) (g : cau_seq β abv)
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - g j) < ε) : is_cau_seq abv f
| ε ε0 :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and
(h _ (half_pos $ half_pos ε0)) (g.cauchy₃ $ half_pos ε0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, begin
cases hi _ (le_refl _) with h₁ h₂, rw abv_sub abv at h₁,
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij).1 h₁),
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add this (h₂ _ ij)),
rwa [add_halves, add_halves, add_right_comm,
sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this
end⟩
lemma not_lim_zero_of_not_congr_zero {f : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) : ¬ lim_zero f :=
assume : lim_zero f,
have lim_zero (f - 0), by simpa,
hf this
lemma mul_equiv_zero (g : cau_seq _ abv) {f : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : g * f ≈ 0 :=
have lim_zero (f - 0), from hf,
have lim_zero (g*f), from mul_lim_zero_right _ $ by simpa,
show lim_zero (g*f - 0), by simpa
lemma mul_not_equiv_zero {f g : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) : ¬ (f * g) ≈ 0 :=
assume : lim_zero (f*g - 0),
have hlz : lim_zero (f*g), by simpa,
have hf' : ¬ lim_zero f, by simpa using (show ¬ lim_zero (f - 0), from hf),
have hg' : ¬ lim_zero g, by simpa using (show ¬ lim_zero (g - 0), from hg),
begin
rcases abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hf' with ⟨a1, ha1, N1, hN1⟩,
rcases abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hg' with ⟨a2, ha2, N2, hN2⟩,
have : a1 * a2 > 0, from mul_pos ha1 ha2,
cases hlz _ this with N hN,
let i := max N (max N1 N2),
have hN' := hN i (le_max_left _ _),
have hN1' := hN1 i (le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)),
have hN1' := hN2 i (le_trans (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _)),
apply not_le_of_lt hN',
change _ ≤ abv (_ * _),
rw is_absolute_value.abv_mul abv,
apply mul_le_mul; try { assumption },
{ apply le_of_lt ha2 },
{ apply is_absolute_value.abv_nonneg abv }
end
theorem const_equiv {x y : β} : const x ≈ const y ↔ x = y :=
show lim_zero _ ↔ _, by rw [← const_sub, const_lim_zero, sub_eq_zero]
end ring
section comm_ring
variables {β : Type*} [comm_ring β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv]
lemma mul_equiv_zero' (g : cau_seq _ abv) {f : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : f * g ≈ 0 :=
by rw mul_comm; apply mul_equiv_zero _ hf
end comm_ring
section integral_domain
variables {β : Type*} [integral_domain β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
lemma one_not_equiv_zero : ¬ (const abv 1) ≈ (const abv 0) :=
assume h,
have ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ k, k ≥ i → abv (1 - 0) < ε, from h,
have h1 : abv 1 ≤ 0, from le_of_not_gt $
assume h2 : abv 1 > 0,
exists.elim (this _ h2) $ λ i hi,
lt_irrefl (abv 1) $ by simpa using hi _ (le_refl _),
have h2 : abv 1 ≥ 0, from is_absolute_value.abv_nonneg _ _,
have abv 1 = 0, from le_antisymm h1 h2,
have (1 : β) = 0, from (is_absolute_value.abv_eq_zero abv).1 this,
absurd this one_ne_zero
end integral_domain
section field
variables {β : Type*} [field β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem inv_aux {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf : ¬ lim_zero f) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv ((f j)⁻¹ - (f i)⁻¹) < ε | ε ε0 :=
let ⟨K, K0, HK⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hf,
⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_inv_continuous_lemma abv ε0 K0,
⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and HK (f.cauchy₃ δ0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, let ⟨iK, H'⟩ := H _ (le_refl _) in Hδ (H _ ij).1 iK (H' _ ij)⟩
def inv (f) (hf : ¬ lim_zero f) : cau_seq β abv := ⟨_, inv_aux hf⟩
@[simp] theorem inv_apply {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf i) : inv f hf i = (f i)⁻¹ := rfl
theorem inv_mul_cancel {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf) : inv f hf * f ≈ 1 :=
λ ε ε0, let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hf in
⟨i, λ j ij,
by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)),
abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_inv {x : β} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
const abv (x⁻¹) = inv (const abv x) (by rwa const_lim_zero) :=
ext (assume n, by simp[inv_apply, const_apply])
end field
section abs
local notation `const` := const abs
/-- The entries of a positive Cauchy sequence eventually have a positive lower bound. -/
def pos (f : cau_seq α abs) : Prop := ∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ f j
theorem not_lim_zero_of_pos {f : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → ¬ lim_zero f
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ H :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ F0),
⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ (le_refl _) in
not_lt_of_le h₁ (abs_lt.1 h₂).2
theorem const_pos {x : α} : pos (const x) ↔ 0 < x :=
⟨λ ⟨K, K0, i, h⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (h _ (le_refl _)),
λ h, ⟨x, h, 0, λ j _, le_refl _⟩⟩
theorem add_pos {f g : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → pos g → pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG in
⟨_, _root_.add_pos F0 G0, i,
λ j ij, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij in add_le_add h₁ h₂⟩
theorem pos_add_lim_zero {f g : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → lim_zero g → pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ H :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ (half_pos F0)) in
⟨_, half_pos F0, i, λ j ij, begin
cases h j ij with h₁ h₂,
have := add_le_add h₁ (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 h₂).1),
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two] at this
end⟩
protected theorem mul_pos {f g : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → pos g → pos (f * g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG in
⟨_, _root_.mul_pos F0 G0, i,
λ j ij, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij in
mul_le_mul h₁ h₂ (le_of_lt G0) (le_trans (le_of_lt F0) h₁)⟩
theorem trichotomy (f : cau_seq α abs) : pos f ∨ lim_zero f ∨ pos (-f) :=
begin
cases classical.em (lim_zero f); simp *,
rcases abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero h with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩,
rcases exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ K0) with ⟨i, hi⟩,
refine (le_total 0 (f i)).imp _ _;
refine (λ h, ⟨K, K0, i, λ j ij, _⟩);
have := (hi _ ij).1;
cases hi _ (le_refl _) with h₁ h₂,
{ rwa abs_of_nonneg at this,
rw abs_of_nonneg h at h₁,
exact (le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).1
(le_trans h₁ $ neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'.1 $
le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 $ h₂ _ ij).1) },
{ rwa abs_of_nonpos at this,
rw abs_of_nonpos h at h₁,
rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right, zero_sub],
exact le_trans (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 $ h₂ _ ij).2) h₁ }
end
instance : has_lt (cau_seq α abs) := ⟨λ f g, pos (g - f)⟩
instance : has_le (cau_seq α abs) := ⟨λ f g, f < g ∨ f ≈ g⟩
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(fg : f < g) (gh : g ≈ h) : f < h :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm] using pos_add_lim_zero fg (neg_lim_zero gh)
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(fg : f ≈ g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
by have := pos_add_lim_zero gh (neg_lim_zero fg);
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right] at this
theorem lt_trans {f g h : cau_seq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm] using add_pos fg gh
theorem lt_irrefl {f : cau_seq α abs} : ¬ f < f
| h := not_lim_zero_of_pos h (by simp [zero_lim_zero])
lemma le_of_eq_of_le {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(hfg : f ≈ g) (hgh : g ≤ h) : f ≤ h :=
hgh.elim (or.inl ∘ cau_seq.lt_of_eq_of_lt hfg)
(or.inr ∘ setoid.trans hfg)
lemma le_of_le_of_eq {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(hfg : f ≤ g) (hgh : g ≈ h) : f ≤ h :=
hfg.elim (λ h, or.inl (cau_seq.lt_of_lt_of_eq h hgh))
(λ h, or.inr (setoid.trans h hgh))
instance : preorder (cau_seq α abs) :=
{ lt := (<),
le := λ f g, f < g ∨ f ≈ g,
le_refl := λ f, or.inr (setoid.refl _),
le_trans := λ f g h fg, match fg with
| or.inl fg, or.inl gh := or.inl $ lt_trans fg gh
| or.inl fg, or.inr gh := or.inl $ lt_of_lt_of_eq fg gh
| or.inr fg, or.inl gh := or.inl $ lt_of_eq_of_lt fg gh
| or.inr fg, or.inr gh := or.inr $ setoid.trans fg gh
end,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ f g,
⟨λ h, ⟨or.inl h,
not_or (mt (lt_trans h) lt_irrefl) (not_lim_zero_of_pos h)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁.resolve_right
(mt (λ h, or.inr (setoid.symm h)) h₂)⟩ }
theorem le_antisymm {f g : cau_seq α abs} (fg : f ≤ g) (gf : g ≤ f) : f ≈ g :=
fg.resolve_left (not_lt_of_le gf)
theorem lt_total (f g : cau_seq α abs) : f < g ∨ f ≈ g ∨ g < f :=
(trichotomy (g - f)).imp_right
(λ h, h.imp (λ h, setoid.symm h) (λ h, by rwa neg_sub at h))
theorem le_total (f g : cau_seq α abs) : f ≤ g ∨ g ≤ f :=
(or.assoc.2 (lt_total f g)).imp_right or.inl
theorem const_lt {x y : α} : const x < const y ↔ x < y :=
show pos _ ↔ _, by rw [← const_sub, const_pos, sub_pos]
theorem const_le {x y : α} : const x ≤ const y ↔ x ≤ y :=
by rw le_iff_lt_or_eq; exact or_congr const_lt const_equiv
lemma le_of_exists {f g : cau_seq α abs}
(h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, f j ≤ g j) : f ≤ g :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h in
(or.assoc.2 (cau_seq.lt_total f g)).elim
id
(λ hgf, false.elim (let ⟨K, hK0, j, hKj⟩ := hgf in
not_lt_of_ge (hi (max i j) (le_max_left _ _))
(sub_pos.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hK0 (hKj _ (le_max_right _ _))))))
theorem exists_gt (f : cau_seq α abs) : ∃ a : α, f < const a :=
let ⟨K, H⟩ := f.bounded in
⟨K + 1, 1, zero_lt_one, 0, λ i _, begin
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_le_add_iff_right],
exact le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H _)).2
end⟩
theorem exists_lt (f : cau_seq α abs) : ∃ a : α, const a < f :=
let ⟨a, h⟩ := (-f).exists_gt in ⟨-a, show pos _,
by rwa [const_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
end abs
end cau_seq
|
a4d568037f415dd89a400c795ed7a017944a03c6 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /archive/100-theorems-list/37_solution_of_cubic.lean | efa87d1353b091e1308c82d3ca18777dcbcd3caf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,896 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jeoff Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeoff Lee
-/
import tactic.linear_combination
import ring_theory.roots_of_unity
import ring_theory.polynomial.cyclotomic.basic
/-!
# The Solution of a Cubic
This file proves Theorem 37 from the [100 Theorems List](https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/).
In this file, we give the solutions to the cubic equation `a * x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d = 0`
over a field `K` that has characteristic neither 2 nor 3, that has a third primitive root of
unity, and in which certain other quantities admit square and cube roots.
This is based on the [Cardano's Formula](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation#Cardano's_formula).
## Main statements
- `cubic_eq_zero_iff` : gives the roots of the cubic equation
where the discriminant `p = 3 * a * c - b^2` is nonzero.
- `cubic_eq_zero_iff_of_p_eq_zero` : gives the roots of the cubic equation
where the discriminant equals zero.
## References
Originally ported from Isabelle/HOL. The
[original file](https://isabelle.in.tum.de/dist/library/HOL/HOL-ex/Cubic_Quartic.html) was written by Amine Chaieb.
## Tags
polynomial, cubic, root
-/
section field
open polynomial
variables {K : Type*} [field K]
variables [invertible (2 : K)] [invertible (3 : K)]
variables (a b c d : K)
variables {ω p q r s t : K}
lemma cube_root_of_unity_sum (hω : is_primitive_root ω 3) : 1 + ω + ω^2 = 0 :=
begin
convert hω.is_root_cyclotomic (nat.succ_pos _),
simp only [cyclotomic_prime, eval_geom_sum],
simp [finset.sum_range_succ]
end
/-- The roots of a monic cubic whose quadratic term is zero and whose discriminant is nonzero. -/
lemma cubic_basic_eq_zero_iff
(hω : is_primitive_root ω 3)
(hp_nonzero : p ≠ 0)
(hr : r^2 = q^2 + p^3)
(hs3 : s^3 = q + r)
(ht : t * s = p)
(x : K) :
x^3 + 3 * p * x - 2 * q = 0 ↔
x = s - t ∨
x = s * ω - t * ω^2 ∨
x = s * ω^2 - t * ω :=
begin
have h₁ : ∀ x a₁ a₂ a₃ : K, x = a₁ ∨ x = a₂ ∨ x = a₃ ↔ (x - a₁) * (x - a₂) * (x - a₃) = 0,
{ intros, simp only [mul_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero, or.assoc] },
rw h₁,
refine eq.congr _ rfl,
have hs_nonzero : s ≠ 0,
{ contrapose! hp_nonzero with hs_nonzero,
linear_combination -1*ht + t*hs_nonzero },
rw ← mul_left_inj' (pow_ne_zero 3 hs_nonzero),
have H := cube_root_of_unity_sum hω,
linear_combination
hr +
(- q + r + s ^ 3) * hs3 -
(3 * x * s ^ 3 + (t * s) ^ 2 + (t * s) * p + p ^ 2) * ht +
((x ^ 2 * (s - t) + x * (- ω * (s ^ 2 + t ^ 2) + s * t * (3 + ω ^ 2 - ω))
- (-(s ^ 3 - t ^ 3) * (ω - 1) + s^2 * t * ω ^ 2 - s * t^2 * ω ^ 2)) * s ^ 3) * H,
end
/-- Roots of a monic cubic whose discriminant is nonzero. -/
lemma cubic_monic_eq_zero_iff
(hω : is_primitive_root ω 3)
(hp : p = (3 * c - b^2) / 9)
(hp_nonzero : p ≠ 0)
(hq : q = (9 * b * c - 2 * b^3 - 27 * d) / 54)
(hr : r^2 = q^2 + p^3)
(hs3 : s^3 = q + r)
(ht : t * s = p)
(x : K) :
x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d = 0 ↔
x = s - t - b / 3 ∨
x = s * ω - t * ω^2 - b / 3 ∨
x = s * ω^2 - t * ω - b / 3 :=
begin
let y := x + b / 3,
have hi2 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := nonzero_of_invertible _,
have hi3 : (3 : K) ≠ 0 := nonzero_of_invertible _,
have h9 : (9 : K) = 3^2 := by norm_num,
have h54 : (54 : K) = 2*3^3 := by norm_num,
have h₁ : x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d = y^3 + 3 * p * y - 2 * q,
{ dsimp only [y],
rw [hp, hq],
field_simp [h9, h54], ring, },
rw [h₁, cubic_basic_eq_zero_iff hω hp_nonzero hr hs3 ht y],
dsimp only [y],
simp_rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq],
end
/-- **The Solution of Cubic**.
The roots of a cubic polynomial whose discriminant is nonzero. -/
theorem cubic_eq_zero_iff (ha : a ≠ 0)
(hω : is_primitive_root ω 3)
(hp : p = (3 * a * c - b^2) / (9 * a^2))
(hp_nonzero : p ≠ 0)
(hq : q = (9 * a * b * c - 2 * b^3 - 27 * a^2 * d) / (54 * a^3))
(hr : r^2 = q^2 + p^3)
(hs3 : s^3 = q + r)
(ht : t * s = p)
(x : K) :
a * x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d = 0 ↔
x = s - t - b / (3 * a) ∨
x = s * ω - t * ω^2 - b / (3 * a) ∨
x = s * ω^2 - t * ω - b / (3 * a) :=
begin
have hi2 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := nonzero_of_invertible _,
have hi3 : (3 : K) ≠ 0 := nonzero_of_invertible _,
have h9 : (9 : K) = 3^2 := by norm_num,
have h54 : (54 : K) = 2*3^3 := by norm_num,
have h₁ : a * x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d = a * (x^3 + b/a * x^2 + c/a * x + d/a),
{ field_simp, ring },
have h₂ : ∀ x, a * x = 0 ↔ x = 0, { intros x, simp [ha], },
have hp' : p = (3 * (c/a) - (b/a) ^ 2) / 9, { field_simp [hp, h9], ring_nf },
have hq' : q = (9 * (b/a) * (c/a) - 2 * (b/a) ^ 3 - 27 * (d/a)) / 54,
{ field_simp [hq, h54], ring_nf },
rw [h₁, h₂, cubic_monic_eq_zero_iff (b/a) (c/a) (d/a) hω hp' hp_nonzero hq' hr hs3 ht x],
have h₄ := calc b / a / 3 = b / (a * 3) : by { field_simp [ha] }
... = b / (3 * a) : by rw mul_comm,
rw [h₄],
end
/-- the solution of the cubic equation when p equals zero. -/
lemma cubic_eq_zero_iff_of_p_eq_zero (ha : a ≠ 0)
(hω : is_primitive_root ω 3)
(hpz : 3 * a * c - b^2 = 0)
(hq : q = (9 * a * b * c - 2 * b^3 - 27 * a^2 * d) / (54 * a^3))
(hs3 : s^3 = 2 * q)
(x : K) :
a * x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d = 0 ↔
x = s - b / (3 * a) ∨
x = s * ω - b / (3 * a) ∨
x = s * ω^2 - b / (3 * a) :=
begin
have h₁ : ∀ x a₁ a₂ a₃ : K, x = a₁ ∨ x = a₂ ∨ x = a₃ ↔ (x - a₁) * (x - a₂) * (x - a₃) = 0,
{ intros, simp only [mul_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero, or.assoc] },
have hi2 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := nonzero_of_invertible _,
have hi3 : (3 : K) ≠ 0 := nonzero_of_invertible _,
have h54 : (54 : K) = 2*3^3 := by norm_num,
have hb2 : b^2 = 3 * a * c, { rw sub_eq_zero at hpz, rw hpz },
have hb3 : b^3 = 3 * a * b * c, { rw [pow_succ, hb2], ring },
have h₂ :=
calc a * x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d
= a * (x + b/(3*a))^3 + (c - b^2/(3*a)) * x + (d - b^3*a/(3*a)^3)
: by { field_simp, ring }
... = a * (x + b/(3*a))^3 + (d - (9*a*b*c-2*b^3)*a/(3*a)^3)
: by { simp only [hb2, hb3], field_simp, ring }
... = a * ((x + b/(3*a))^3 - s^3)
: by { rw [hs3, hq], field_simp [h54], ring, },
have h₃ : ∀ x, a * x = 0 ↔ x = 0, { intro x, simp [ha] },
have h₄ : ∀ x : K, x^3 - s^3 = (x - s) * (x - s * ω) * (x - s * ω^2),
{ intro x,
calc x^3 - s^3
= (x - s) * (x^2 + x*s + s^2) : by ring
... = (x - s) * (x^2 - (ω+ω^2)*x*s + (1+ω+ω^2)*x*s + s^2) : by ring
... = (x - s) * (x^2 - (ω+ω^2)*x*s + ω^3*s^2)
: by { rw [hω.pow_eq_one, cube_root_of_unity_sum hω], simp, }
... = (x - s) * (x - s * ω) * (x - s * ω^2) : by ring },
rw [h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄ (x + b/(3*a))],
ring_nf,
end
end field
|
85163aae0ef8d3a8698d3ffe3647bc6f84d990bf | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/model_theory/skolem.lean | 517db8987361f380bbe45d6daf5e52e17f206b08 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,154 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import model_theory.elementary_maps
/-!
# Skolem Functions and Downward Löwenheim–Skolem
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
## Main Definitions
* `first_order.language.skolem₁` is a language consisting of Skolem functions for another language.
## Main Results
* `first_order.language.exists_elementary_substructure_card_eq` is the Downward Löwenheim–Skolem
theorem: If `s` is a set in an `L`-structure `M` and `κ` an infinite cardinal such that
`max (# s, L.card) ≤ κ` and `κ ≤ # M`, then `M` has an elementary substructure containing `s` of
cardinality `κ`.
## TODO
* Use `skolem₁` recursively to construct an actual Skolemization of a language.
-/
universes u v w w'
namespace first_order
namespace language
open Structure cardinal
open_locale cardinal
variables (L : language.{u v}) {M : Type w} [nonempty M] [L.Structure M]
/-- A language consisting of Skolem functions for another language.
Called `skolem₁` because it is the first step in building a Skolemization of a language. -/
@[simps] def skolem₁ : language := ⟨λ n, L.bounded_formula empty (n + 1), λ _, empty⟩
variables {L}
theorem card_functions_sum_skolem₁ :
# (Σ n, (L.sum L.skolem₁).functions n) = # (Σ n, L.bounded_formula empty (n + 1)) :=
begin
simp only [card_functions_sum, skolem₁_functions, lift_id', mk_sigma, sum_add_distrib'],
rw [add_comm, add_eq_max, max_eq_left],
{ refine sum_le_sum _ _ (λ n, _),
rw [← lift_le, lift_lift, lift_mk_le],
refine ⟨⟨λ f, (func f default).bd_equal (func f default), λ f g h, _⟩⟩,
rcases h with ⟨rfl, ⟨rfl⟩⟩,
refl },
{ rw ← mk_sigma,
exact infinite_iff.1 (infinite.of_injective (λ n, ⟨n, ⊥⟩) (λ x y xy, (sigma.mk.inj xy).1)) }
end
theorem card_functions_sum_skolem₁_le :
# (Σ n, (L.sum L.skolem₁).functions n) ≤ max ℵ₀ L.card :=
begin
rw card_functions_sum_skolem₁,
transitivity # (Σ n, L.bounded_formula empty n),
{ exact ⟨⟨sigma.map nat.succ (λ _, id), nat.succ_injective.sigma_map
(λ _, function.injective_id)⟩⟩ },
{ refine trans bounded_formula.card_le (lift_le.1 _),
simp only [mk_empty, lift_zero, lift_uzero, zero_add] }
end
/-- The structure assigning each function symbol of `L.skolem₁` to a skolem function generated with
choice. -/
noncomputable instance skolem₁_Structure : L.skolem₁.Structure M :=
⟨λ n φ x, classical.epsilon (λ a, φ.realize default (fin.snoc x a : _ → M)), λ _ r, empty.elim r⟩
namespace substructure
lemma skolem₁_reduct_is_elementary (S : (L.sum L.skolem₁).substructure M) :
(Lhom.sum_inl.substructure_reduct S).is_elementary :=
begin
apply (Lhom.sum_inl.substructure_reduct S).is_elementary_of_exists,
intros n φ x a h,
let φ' : (L.sum L.skolem₁).functions n := (Lhom.sum_inr.on_function φ),
exact ⟨⟨fun_map φ' (coe ∘ x), S.fun_mem (Lhom.sum_inr.on_function φ) (coe ∘ x) (λ i, (x i).2)⟩,
classical.epsilon_spec ⟨a, h⟩⟩,
end
/-- Any `L.sum L.skolem₁`-substructure is an elementary `L`-substructure. -/
noncomputable def elementary_skolem₁_reduct (S : (L.sum L.skolem₁).substructure M) :
L.elementary_substructure M :=
⟨Lhom.sum_inl.substructure_reduct S, S.skolem₁_reduct_is_elementary⟩
lemma coe_sort_elementary_skolem₁_reduct
(S : (L.sum L.skolem₁).substructure M) :
(S.elementary_skolem₁_reduct : Type w) = S :=
rfl
end substructure
open substructure
variables (L) (M)
instance : small (⊥ : (L.sum L.skolem₁).substructure M).elementary_skolem₁_reduct :=
begin
rw [coe_sort_elementary_skolem₁_reduct],
apply_instance,
end
theorem exists_small_elementary_substructure :
∃ (S : L.elementary_substructure M), small.{max u v} S :=
⟨substructure.elementary_skolem₁_reduct ⊥, infer_instance⟩
variables {M}
/-- The Downward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem :
If `s` is a set in an `L`-structure `M` and `κ` an infinite cardinal such that
`max (# s, L.card) ≤ κ` and `κ ≤ # M`, then `M` has an elementary substructure containing `s` of
cardinality `κ`. -/
theorem exists_elementary_substructure_card_eq (s : set M) (κ : cardinal.{w'})
(h1 : ℵ₀ ≤ κ)
(h2 : cardinal.lift.{w'} (# s) ≤ cardinal.lift.{w} κ)
(h3 : cardinal.lift.{w'} L.card ≤ cardinal.lift.{max u v} κ)
(h4 : cardinal.lift.{w} κ ≤ cardinal.lift.{w'} (# M)) :
∃ (S : L.elementary_substructure M), s ⊆ S ∧
cardinal.lift.{w'} (# S) = cardinal.lift.{w} κ :=
begin
obtain ⟨s', hs'⟩ := cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h4,
rw ← aleph_0_le_lift at h1,
rw ← hs' at *,
refine ⟨elementary_skolem₁_reduct (closure (L.sum L.skolem₁)
(s ∪ (equiv.ulift '' s'))),
(s.subset_union_left _).trans subset_closure, _⟩,
have h := mk_image_eq_lift _ s' equiv.ulift.injective,
rw [lift_umax, lift_id'] at h,
rw [coe_sort_elementary_skolem₁_reduct, ← h, lift_inj],
refine le_antisymm (lift_le.1 (lift_card_closure_le.trans _))
(mk_le_mk_of_subset ((set.subset_union_right _ _).trans subset_closure)),
rw [max_le_iff, aleph_0_le_lift, ← aleph_0_le_lift, h, add_eq_max, max_le_iff, lift_le],
refine ⟨h1, (mk_union_le _ _).trans _, (lift_le.2 card_functions_sum_skolem₁_le).trans _⟩,
{ rw [← lift_le, lift_add, h, add_comm, add_eq_max h1],
exact max_le le_rfl h2 },
{ rw [lift_max, lift_aleph_0, max_le_iff, aleph_0_le_lift, and_comm,
← lift_le.{_ w'}, lift_lift, lift_lift, ← aleph_0_le_lift, h],
refine ⟨_, h1⟩,
simp only [← lift_lift, lift_umax, lift_umax'],
rw [lift_lift, ← lift_lift.{w' w} L.card],
refine trans ((lift_le.{_ w}).2 h3) _,
rw [lift_lift, ← lift_lift.{w (max u v)}, ← hs', ← h, lift_lift, lift_lift, lift_lift] },
{ refine trans _ (lift_le.2 (mk_le_mk_of_subset (set.subset_union_right _ _))),
rw [aleph_0_le_lift, ← aleph_0_le_lift, h],
exact h1 }
end
end language
end first_order
|
b5962b4e41515861b60d968f269bef7302f9daa1 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/algebraic_geometry/stalks.lean | afb7eb2c5e230dead3e4958905aa5ca9ae91f5a5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,853 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebraic_geometry.presheafed_space
import topology.sheaves.stalks
/-!
# Stalks for presheaved spaces
This file lifts constructions of stalks and pushforwards of stalks to work with
the category of presheafed spaces.
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u v' u'
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits category_theory.category category_theory.functor
open algebraic_geometry
open topological_space
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [has_colimits C]
local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
open Top.presheaf
namespace algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace
/--
The stalk at `x` of a `PresheafedSpace`.
-/
def stalk (X : PresheafedSpace C) (x : X) : C := X.presheaf.stalk x
/--
A morphism of presheafed spaces induces a morphism of stalks.
-/
def stalk_map {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (x : X) : Y.stalk (α.base x) ⟶ X.stalk x :=
(stalk_functor C (α.base x)).map (α.c) ≫ X.presheaf.stalk_pushforward C α.base x
section restrict
-- PROJECT: restriction preserves stalks.
-- We'll want to define cofinal functors, show precomposing with a cofinal functor preserves
-- colimits, and (easily) verify that "open neighbourhoods of x within U" is cofinal in "open
-- neighbourhoods of x".
/-
def restrict_stalk_iso {U : Top} (X : PresheafedSpace C)
(f : U ⟶ (X : Top.{v})) (h : open_embedding f) (x : U) :
(X.restrict f h).stalk x ≅ X.stalk (f x) :=
begin
dsimp only [stalk, Top.presheaf.stalk, stalk_functor],
dsimp [colim],
sorry
end
-- TODO `restrict_stalk_iso` is compatible with `germ`.
-/
end restrict
namespace stalk_map
@[simp] lemma id (X : PresheafedSpace C) (x : X) : stalk_map (𝟙 X) x = 𝟙 (X.stalk x) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_map],
simp only [stalk_pushforward.id],
rw [←map_comp],
convert (stalk_functor C x).map_id X.presheaf,
tidy,
end
-- TODO understand why this proof is still gross (i.e. requires using `erw`)
@[simp] lemma comp {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) :
stalk_map (α ≫ β) x =
(stalk_map β (α.base x) : Z.stalk (β.base (α.base x)) ⟶ Y.stalk (α.base x)) ≫
(stalk_map α x : Y.stalk (α.base x) ⟶ X.stalk x) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_map, stalk_functor, stalk_pushforward],
ext U,
op_induction U,
cases U,
simp only [colimit.ι_map_assoc, colimit.ι_pre_assoc, colimit.ι_pre,
whisker_left_app, whisker_right_app,
assoc, id_comp, map_id, map_comp],
dsimp,
simp only [map_id, assoc, pushforward.comp_inv_app],
-- FIXME Why doesn't simp do this:
erw [category_theory.functor.map_id],
erw [category_theory.functor.map_id],
erw [id_comp, id_comp, id_comp],
end
end stalk_map
end algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace
|
9b748685611b20b54d7e594bea5fd88b08448778 | 856e2e1615a12f95b551ed48fa5b03b245abba44 | /src/topology/algebra/module.lean | 1bd3d014e0e7d6306d4a19bb084e223ed247e440 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pimsp/mathlib | 8b77e1ccfab21703ba8fbe65988c7de7765aa0e5 | 913318ca9d6979686996e8d9b5ebf7e74aae1c63 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,812,465,182 | 1,597,133,610,000 | 1,597,133,610,000 | 281,890,685 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,595,491,577,000 | 1,595,491,576,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,545 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.algebra.ring
import topology.uniform_space.uniform_embedding
import ring_theory.algebra
import linear_algebra.projection
/-!
# Theory of topological modules and continuous linear maps.
We define classes `topological_semimodule`, `topological_module` and `topological_vector_spaces`,
as extensions of the corresponding algebraic classes where the algebraic operations are continuous.
We also define continuous linear maps, as linear maps between topological modules which are
continuous. The set of continuous linear maps between the topological `R`-modules `M` and `M₂` is
denoted by `M →L[R] M₂`.
Continuous linear equivalences are denoted by `M ≃L[R] M₂`.
## Implementation notes
Topological vector spaces are defined as an `abbreviation` for topological modules,
if the base ring is a field. This has as advantage that topological vector spaces are completely
transparent for type class inference, which means that all instances for topological modules
are immediately picked up for vector spaces as well.
A cosmetic disadvantage is that one can not extend topological vector spaces.
The solution is to extend `topological_module` instead.
-/
open filter
open_locale topological_space big_operators
universes u v w u'
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological semimodule, over a semiring which is also a topological space, is a
semimodule in which scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, R will be a topological
semiring and M a topological additive semigroup, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_semimodule (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] : Prop :=
(continuous_smul : continuous (λp : R × M, p.1 • p.2))
end prio
section
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] [topological_semimodule R M]
lemma continuous_smul : continuous (λp:R×M, p.1 • p.2) :=
topological_semimodule.continuous_smul
lemma continuous.smul {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {f : α → R} {g : α → M}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λp, f p • g p) :=
continuous_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma tendsto_smul {c : R} {x : M} : tendsto (λp:R×M, p.fst • p.snd) (𝓝 (c, x)) (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
continuous_smul.tendsto _
lemma filter.tendsto.smul {α : Type*} {l : filter α} {f : α → R} {g : α → M} {c : R} {x : M}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) (hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 x)) : tendsto (λ a, f a • g a) l (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
tendsto_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological module, over a ring which is also a topological space, is a module in which
scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, `R` will be a topological ring and `M` a
topological additive group, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_module (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M]
extends topological_semimodule R M : Prop
/-- A topological vector space is a topological module over a field. -/
abbreviation topological_vector_space (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] :=
topological_module R M
end prio
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M] [topological_module R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a unit is a homeomorphism from a
topological module onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_unit (a : units R) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (a : R) • x,
inv_fun := λ x, ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x,
right_inv := λ x, calc (a : R) • ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.mul_inv, one_smul],
left_inv := λ x, calc ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • (a : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.inv_mul, one_smul],
continuous_to_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id }
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_closed_map
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior.
This is the case, e.g., if `R` is a nondiscrete normed field. -/
lemma submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [has_continuous_add M]
[ne_bot (nhds_within (0:R) {x | is_unit x})]
(s : submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s:set M)).nonempty) :
s = ⊤ :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine (submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, _),
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy,
have : tendsto (λ c:R, y + c • x) (nhds_within 0 {x | is_unit x}) (𝓝 (y + (0:R) • x)),
from tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul
tendsto_const_nhds),
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this,
rcases nonempty_of_mem_sets (inter_mem_sets (mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhds_within)
with ⟨_, hu, u, rfl⟩,
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_nhds hy,
exact (s.smul_mem_iff' _).1 ((s.add_mem_iff_right hy').1 hu)
end
end
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {a : R}
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[vector_space R M] [topological_vector_space R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a non-zero field element is a
homeomorphism from a topological vector space onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{.. homeomorph.smul_of_unit (units.mk0 a ha)}
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_closed_map
end
/-- Continuous linear maps between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary for the
definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the topological
ring `R`. -/
structure continuous_linear_map
(R : Type*) [semiring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends linear_map R M M₂ :=
(cont : continuous to_fun)
notation M ` →L[`:25 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_map R M M₂
/-- Continuous linear equivalences between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary
for the definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the
topological ring `R`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure continuous_linear_equiv
(R : Type*) [semiring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends linear_equiv R M M₂ :=
(continuous_to_fun : continuous to_fun)
(continuous_inv_fun : continuous inv_fun)
notation M ` ≃L[`:50 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_equiv R M M₂
namespace continuous_linear_map
section semiring
/- Properties that hold for non-necessarily commutative semirings. -/
variables
{R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M →L[R] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨to_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to functions. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance to_fun : has_coe_to_fun $ M →L[R] M₂ := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) : (mk f h : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk' (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (h) : (mk f h : M → M₂) = f := rfl
protected lemma continuous (f : M →L[R] M₂) : continuous f := f.2
theorem coe_injective : function.injective (coe : (M →L[R] M₂) → (M →ₗ[R] M₂)) :=
by { intros f g H, cases f, cases g, congr' 1, exact H }
theorem coe_injective' ⦃f g : M →L[R] M₂⦄ (H : (f : M → M₂) = g) : f = g :=
coe_injective $ linear_map.coe_injective H
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : M →L[R] M₂} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_injective' $ funext h
theorem ext_iff {f g : M →L[R] M₂} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, by ext⟩
variables (c : R) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x y z : M)
-- make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero : f (0 : M) = 0 := (to_linear_map _).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add : f (x + y) = f x + f y := (to_linear_map _).map_add _ _
@[simp] lemma map_smul : f (c • x) = c • f x := (to_linear_map _).map_smul _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_coe : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (M → M₂)) = (f : M → M₂) := rfl
/-- The continuous map that is constantly zero. -/
instance: has_zero (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨⟨0, continuous_const⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply : (0 : M →L[R] M₂) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = 0 := rfl
/- no simp attribute on the next line as simp does not always simplify `0 x` to `0`
when `0` is the zero function, while it does for the zero continuous linear map,
and this is the most important property we care about. -/
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_zero' : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = 0 := rfl
section
variables (R M)
/-- the identity map as a continuous linear map. -/
def id : M →L[R] M :=
⟨linear_map.id, continuous_id⟩
end
instance : has_one (M →L[R] M) := ⟨id R M⟩
lemma id_apply : id R M x = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id : (id R M : M →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.id := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id' : (id R M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_apply : (1 : M →L[R] M) x = x := rfl
section add
variables [has_continuous_add M₂]
instance : has_add (M →L[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) + g := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_add' : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) + g := rfl
instance : add_comm_monoid (M →L[R] M₂) :=
by { refine {zero := 0, add := (+), ..}; intros; ext;
apply_rules [zero_add, add_assoc, add_zero, add_left_neg, add_comm] }
lemma sum_apply {ι : Type*} (t : finset ι) (f : ι → M →L[R] M₂) (b : M) :
(∑ d in t, f d) b = ∑ d in t, f d b :=
begin
haveI : is_add_monoid_hom (λ (g : M →L[R] M₂), g b) :=
{ map_add := λ f g, continuous_linear_map.add_apply f g b, map_zero := by simp },
exact (finset.sum_hom t (λ g : M →L[R] M₂, g b)).symm
end
end add
/-- Composition of bounded linear maps. -/
def comp (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.comp g.to_linear_map f.to_linear_map, g.2.comp f.2⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp : ((h.comp f) : (M →ₗ[R] M₃)) = (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp' : ((h.comp f) : (M → M₃)) = (h : M₂ → M₃) ∘ f := rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id : f.comp (id R M) = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp : (id R M₂).comp f = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_zero : f.comp (0 : M₃ →L[R] M) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem zero_comp : (0 : M₂ →L[R] M₃).comp f = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma comp_add [has_continuous_add M₂] [has_continuous_add M₃]
(g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : M →L[R] M₂) :
g.comp (f₁ + f₂) = g.comp f₁ + g.comp f₂ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma add_comp [has_continuous_add M₃]
(g₁ g₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).comp f = g₁.comp f + g₂.comp f :=
by { ext, simp }
theorem comp_assoc (h : M₃ →L[R] M₄) (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
instance : has_mul (M →L[R] M) := ⟨comp⟩
lemma mul_def (f g : M →L[R] M) : f * g = f.comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g : M →L[R] M) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g := rfl
lemma mul_apply (f g : M →L[R] M) (x : M) : (f * g) x = f (g x) := rfl
/-- The cartesian product of two bounded linear maps, as a bounded linear map. -/
protected def prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) : M →L[R] (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ cont := f₁.2.prod_mk f₂.2,
..f₁.to_linear_map.prod f₂.to_linear_map }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.prod f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃) = linear_map.prod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) (x : M) :
f₁.prod f₂ x = (f₁ x, f₂ x) :=
rfl
/-- Kernel of a continuous linear map. -/
def ker (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker
@[norm_cast] lemma ker_coe : (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker = f.ker := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_ker {f : M →L[R] M₂} {x} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 0 := linear_map.mem_ker
lemma is_closed_ker [t1_space M₂] : is_closed (f.ker : set M) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.1 f.cont _ is_closed_singleton
@[simp] lemma apply_ker (x : f.ker) : f x = 0 := mem_ker.1 x.2
lemma is_complete_ker {M' : Type*} [uniform_space M'] [complete_space M'] [add_comm_monoid M']
[semimodule R M'] [t1_space M₂] (f : M' →L[R] M₂) :
is_complete (f.ker : set M') :=
f.is_closed_ker.is_complete
instance complete_space_ker {M' : Type*} [uniform_space M'] [complete_space M'] [add_comm_monoid M']
[semimodule R M'] [t1_space M₂] (f : M' →L[R] M₂) :
complete_space f.ker :=
f.is_closed_ker.complete_space_coe
@[simp] lemma ker_prod (f : M →L[R] M₂) (g : M →L[R] M₃) :
ker (f.prod g) = ker f ⊓ ker g :=
linear_map.ker_prod f g
/-- Range of a continuous linear map. -/
def range (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M₂ := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range
lemma range_coe : (f.range : set M₂) = set.range f := linear_map.range_coe _
lemma mem_range {f : M →L[R] M₂} {y} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y := linear_map.mem_range
lemma range_prod_le (f : M →L[R] M₂) (g : M →L[R] M₃) :
range (f.prod g) ≤ (range f).prod (range g) :=
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range_prod_le g
/-- Restrict codomain of a continuous linear map. -/
def cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
M →L[R] p :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_mk h f.continuous,
to_linear_map := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h}
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
(f.cod_restrict p h : M →ₗ[R] p) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_cod_restrict_apply (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) (x) :
(f.cod_restrict p h x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma ker_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
ker (f.cod_restrict p h) = ker f :=
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker_cod_restrict p h
/-- Embedding of a submodule into the ambient space as a continuous linear map. -/
def subtype_val (p : submodule R M) : p →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_val,
to_linear_map := p.subtype }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_subtype_val (p : submodule R M) :
(subtype_val p : p →ₗ[R] M) = p.subtype :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma subtype_val_apply (p : submodule R M) (x : p) :
(subtype_val p : p → M) x = x :=
rfl
variables (R M M₂)
/-- `prod.fst` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_fst, to_linear_map := linear_map.fst R M M₂ }
/-- `prod.snd` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := continuous_snd, to_linear_map := linear_map.snd R M M₂ }
variables {R M M₂}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.fst R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst' : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M) = prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = linear_map.snd R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd' : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M₂) = prod.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_prod_snd : (fst R M M₂).prod (snd R M M₂) = id R (M × M₂) := ext $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, rfl
/-- `prod.map` of two continuous linear maps. -/
def prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
(f₁.comp (fst R M M₃)).prod (f₂.comp (snd R M M₃))
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
(f₁.prod_map f₂ : (M × M₃) →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = ((f₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prod_map (f₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄)) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map' (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
⇑(f₁.prod_map f₂) = prod.map f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
/-- The continuous linear map given by `(x, y) ↦ f₁ x + f₂ y`. -/
def coprod [has_continuous_add M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(M × M₂) →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂, (f₁.cont.comp continuous_fst).add (f₂.cont.comp continuous_snd)⟩
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_coprod [has_continuous_add M₃]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.coprod f₂ : (M × M₂) →ₗ[R] M₃) = linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coprod_apply [has_continuous_add M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x) :
f₁.coprod f₂ x = f₁ x.1 + f₂ x.2 := rfl
variables [topological_space R] [topological_semimodule R M₂]
/-- The linear map `λ x, c x • f`. Associates to a scalar-valued linear map and an element of
`M₂` the `M₂`-valued linear map obtained by multiplying the two (a.k.a. tensoring by `M₂`) -/
def smul_right (c : M →L[R] R) (f : M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := c.2.smul continuous_const,
..c.to_linear_map.smul_right f }
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_apply {c : M →L[R] R} {f : M₂} {x : M} :
(smul_right c f : M → M₂) x = (c : M → R) x • f :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_one (c : R →L[R] M₂) : smul_right 1 ((c : R → M₂) 1) = c :=
by ext; simp [-continuous_linear_map.map_smul, (continuous_linear_map.map_smul _ _ _).symm]
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_eq_iff {f f' : M₂} :
smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f = smul_right 1 f' ↔ f = f' :=
⟨λ h, have (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f : R → M₂) 1 = (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f' : R → M₂) 1,
by rw h,
by simp at this; assumption,
by cc⟩
lemma smul_right_comp [topological_semimodule R R] {x : M₂} {c : R} :
(smul_right 1 x : R →L[R] M₂).comp (smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R) = smul_right 1 (c • x) :=
by { ext, simp [mul_smul] }
end semiring
section pi
variables
{R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M₂]
{ι : Type*} {φ : ι → Type*} [∀i, topological_space (φ i)] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (φ i)] [∀i, semimodule R (φ i)]
/-- `pi` construction for continuous linear functions. From a family of continuous linear functions
it produces a continuous linear function into a family of topological modules. -/
def pi (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) : M →L[R] (Πi, φ i) :=
⟨linear_map.pi (λ i, (f i : M →ₗ[R] φ i)),
continuous_pi (λ i, (f i).continuous)⟩
@[simp] lemma pi_apply (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) (c : M) (i : ι) :
pi f c i = f i c := rfl
lemma pi_eq_zero (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) : pi f = 0 ↔ (∀i, f i = 0) :=
by simp only [ext_iff, pi_apply, function.funext_iff]; exact ⟨λh a b, h b a, λh a b, h b a⟩
lemma pi_zero : pi (λi, 0 : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) = 0 := by ext; refl
lemma pi_comp (f : Πi, M →L[R] φ i) (g : M₂ →L[R] M) : (pi f).comp g = pi (λi, (f i).comp g) := rfl
/-- The projections from a family of topological modules are continuous linear maps. -/
def proj (i : ι) : (Πi, φ i) →L[R] φ i :=
⟨linear_map.proj i, continuous_apply _⟩
@[simp] lemma proj_apply (i : ι) (b : Πi, φ i) : (proj i : (Πi, φ i) →L[R] φ i) b = b i := rfl
lemma proj_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →L[R] φ i) (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (pi f) = f i :=
ext $ assume c, rfl
lemma infi_ker_proj : (⨅i, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) = ⊥ :=
linear_map.infi_ker_proj
variables (R φ)
/-- If `I` and `J` are complementary index sets, the product of the kernels of the `J`th projections of
`φ` is linearly equivalent to the product over `I`. -/
def infi_ker_proj_equiv {I J : set ι} [decidable_pred (λi, i ∈ I)]
(hd : disjoint I J) (hu : set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) :
(⨅i ∈ J, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) ≃L[R] (Πi:I, φ i) :=
⟨ linear_map.infi_ker_proj_equiv R φ hd hu,
continuous_pi (λ i, begin
have := @continuous_subtype_coe _ _ (λ x, x ∈ (⨅i ∈ J, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i))),
have := continuous.comp (by exact continuous_apply i) this,
exact this
end),
continuous_subtype_mk _ (continuous_pi (λ i, begin
dsimp, split_ifs; [apply continuous_apply, exact continuous_const]
end)) ⟩
end pi
section ring
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
variables (c : R) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x y z : M)
@[simp] lemma map_neg : f (-x) = - (f x) := (to_linear_map _).map_neg _
@[simp] lemma map_sub : f (x - y) = f x - f y := (to_linear_map _).map_sub _ _
@[simp] lemma sub_apply' (x : M) : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
lemma range_prod_eq {f : M →L[R] M₂} {g : M →L[R] M₃} (h : ker f ⊔ ker g = ⊤) :
range (f.prod g) = (range f).prod (range g) :=
linear_map.range_prod_eq h
section
variables [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : has_neg (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ f, ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply : (-f) x = - (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = -(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_neg' : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = -(f : M → M₂) := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (M →L[R] M₂) :=
by { refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..}; intros; ext;
apply_rules [zero_add, add_assoc, add_zero, add_left_neg, add_comm] }
lemma sub_apply (x : M) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub' : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) - g := rfl
end
instance [topological_add_group M] : ring (M →L[R] M) :=
{ mul := (*),
one := 1,
mul_one := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
one_mul := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
mul_assoc := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
left_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, map_add _ _ _,
right_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, linear_map.add_apply _ _ _,
..continuous_linear_map.add_comm_group }
lemma smul_right_one_pow [topological_space R]
[topological_add_group R] [topological_semimodule R R] (c : R) (n : ℕ) :
(smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R)^n = smul_right 1 (c^n) :=
begin
induction n with n ihn,
{ ext, simp },
{ rw [pow_succ, ihn, mul_def, smul_right_comp, smul_eq_mul, pow_succ'] }
end
/-- Given a right inverse `f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M` to `f₁ : M →L[R] M₂`,
`proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h` is the projection `M →L[R] f₁.ker` along `f₂.range`. -/
def proj_ker_of_right_inverse [topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M →L[R] f₁.ker :=
(id R M - f₂.comp f₁).cod_restrict f₁.ker $ λ x, by simp [h (f₁ x)]
@[simp] lemma coe_proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : f₁.ker) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x = x :=
subtype.ext_iff_val.2 $ by simp
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_comp_inv [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h (f₂ y) = 0 :=
subtype.ext_iff_val.2 $ by simp [h y]
end ring
section comm_ring
variables
{R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [topological_space R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [topological_module R M₃]
instance : has_scalar R (M →L[R] M₃) :=
⟨λ c f, ⟨c • f, continuous_const.smul f.2⟩⟩
variables (c : R) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (x y z : M)
@[simp] lemma smul_comp : (c • h).comp f = c • (h.comp f) := rfl
variable [topological_module R M₂]
@[simp] lemma smul_apply : (c • f) x = c • (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_apply : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = c • (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_apply' : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = c • (f : M → M₂) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_smul : h.comp (c • f) = c • (h.comp f) := by { ext, simp }
variable [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : module R (M →L[R] M₂) :=
{ smul_zero := λ _, ext $ λ _, smul_zero _,
zero_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, zero_smul _ _,
one_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, mul_smul _ _ _,
add_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, add_smul _ _ _,
smul_add := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, smul_add _ _ _ }
instance : algebra R (M₂ →L[R] M₂) :=
algebra.of_semimodule' (λ c f, ext $ λ x, rfl) (λ c f, ext $ λ x, f.map_smul c x)
end comm_ring
end continuous_linear_map
namespace continuous_linear_equiv
section add_comm_monoid
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a continuous linear map. -/
def to_continuous_linear_map (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := e.continuous_to_fun,
..e.to_linear_equiv.to_linear_map }
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to continuous linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M ≃L[R] M₂) (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨to_continuous_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to maps. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_def_rev (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.to_continuous_linear_map = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : (e : M →L[R] M₂) b = e b := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = e := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : M ≃L[R] M₂} (h : (f : M → M₂) = g) : f = g :=
begin
cases f; cases g,
simp only,
ext x,
induction h,
refl
end
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a homeomorphism. -/
def to_homeomorph (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M ≃ₜ M₂ := { ..e }
-- Make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e (0 : M) = 0 := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x + y) = e x + e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_add x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : R) (x : M) : e (c • x) = c • (e x) :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_smul c x
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : e x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
e.to_linear_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
protected lemma continuous (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : continuous (e : M → M₂) :=
e.continuous_to_fun
protected lemma continuous_on (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} : continuous_on (e : M → M₂) s :=
e.continuous.continuous_on
protected lemma continuous_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : continuous_at (e : M → M₂) x :=
e.continuous.continuous_at
protected lemma continuous_within_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} {x : M} :
continuous_within_at (e : M → M₂) s x :=
e.continuous.continuous_within_at
lemma comp_continuous_on_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) (s : set α) :
continuous_on (e ∘ f) s ↔ continuous_on f s :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_on_iff _ _
lemma comp_continuous_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) :
continuous (e ∘ f) ↔ continuous f :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_iff _
/-- An extensionality lemma for `R ≃L[R] M`. -/
lemma ext₁ [topological_space R] {f g : R ≃L[R] M} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext $ funext $ λ x, mul_one x ▸ by rw [← smul_eq_mul, map_smul, h, map_smul]
section
variables (R M)
/-- The identity map as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[refl] protected def refl : M ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_id,
.. linear_equiv.refl R M }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl' :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M → M) = id := rfl
/-- The inverse of a continuous linear equivalence as a continuous linear equivalence-/
@[symm] protected def symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M₂ ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_to_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.symm }
@[simp] lemma symm_to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
e.symm.to_linear_equiv = e.to_linear_equiv.symm :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- The composition of two continuous linear equivalences as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[trans] protected def trans (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) : M ≃L[R] M₃ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e₂.continuous_to_fun.comp e₁.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e₁.continuous_inv_fun.comp e₂.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp] lemma trans_to_linear_equiv (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).to_linear_equiv = e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- Product of two continuous linear equivalences. The map comes from `equiv.prod_congr`. -/
def prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) ≃L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_to_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.prod e'.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.prod e' x = (e x.1, e' x.2) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) :
(e.prod e' : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = (e : M →L[R] M₂).prod_map (e' : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :=
rfl
theorem bijective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.bijective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.bijective
theorem injective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.injective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.injective
theorem surjective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.surjective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.surjective
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : M₂) : e (e.symm c) = c := e.1.6 c
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : e.symm (e b) = b := e.1.5 b
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_coe_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M →L[R] M₂).comp (e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M₂ :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_symm_comp_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M).comp (e : M →L[R] M₂) = continuous_linear_map.id R M :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.symm_apply_apply
lemma symm_comp_self (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ → M) ∘ (e : M → M₂) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact symm_apply_apply e x }
lemma self_comp_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M → M₂) ∘ (e.symm : M₂ → M) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact apply_symm_apply e x }
@[simp] lemma symm_comp_self' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) ∘ ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = id :=
symm_comp_self e
@[simp] lemma self_comp_symm' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) ∘ ((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) = id :=
self_comp_symm e
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.symm.symm = e :=
by { ext x, refl }
theorem symm_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e.symm.symm x = e x :=
rfl
lemma symm_apply_eq (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
e.to_linear_equiv.symm_apply_eq
lemma eq_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
e.to_linear_equiv.eq_symm_apply
/-- Create a `continuous_linear_equiv` from two `continuous_linear_map`s that are
inverse of each other. -/
def equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h₁ : function.left_inverse f₂ f₁)
(h₂ : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f₁,
continuous_to_fun := f₁.continuous,
inv_fun := f₂,
continuous_inv_fun := f₂.continuous,
left_inv := h₁,
right_inv := h₂,
.. f₁ }
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_inverse_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂ x) :
equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ x = f₁ x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂) :
(equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂).symm = equiv_of_inverse f₂ f₁ h₂ h₁ :=
rfl
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M₄]
variables [topological_add_group M₄]
/-- Equivalence given by a block lower diagonal matrix. `e` and `e'` are diagonal square blocks,
and `f` is a rectangular block below the diagonal. -/
def skew_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) :
(M × M₃) ≃L[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := (e.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
((e'.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_snd).add $ f.continuous.comp continuous_fst),
continuous_inv_fun := (e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
(e'.continuous_inv_fun.comp $ continuous_snd.sub $ f.continuous.comp $
e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst),
.. e.to_linear_equiv.skew_prod e'.to_linear_equiv ↑f }
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.skew_prod e' f x = (e x.1, e' x.2 + f x.1) := rfl
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
(e.skew_prod e' f).symm x = (e.symm x.1, e'.symm (x.2 - f (e.symm x.1))) := rfl
end add_comm_group
section ring
variables {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [semimodule R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [semimodule R M₂]
@[simp] lemma map_sub (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x - y) = e x - e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_sub x y
@[simp] lemma map_neg (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e (-x) = -e x := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_neg x
section
variables (R) [topological_space R] [topological_module R R]
/-- Continuous linear equivalences `R ≃L[R] R` are enumerated by `units R`. -/
def units_equiv_aut : units R ≃ (R ≃L[R] R) :=
{ to_fun := λ u, equiv_of_inverse
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u)
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u⁻¹)
(λ x, by simp) (λ x, by simp),
inv_fun := λ e, ⟨e 1, e.symm 1,
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, symm_apply_apply],
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, apply_symm_apply]⟩,
left_inv := λ u, units.ext $ by simp,
right_inv := λ e, ext₁ $ by simp }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply (u : units R) (x : R) : units_equiv_aut R u x = x * u := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply_symm (u : units R) (x : R) :
(units_equiv_aut R u).symm x = x * ↑u⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_symm_apply (e : R ≃L[R] R) :
↑((units_equiv_aut R).symm e) = e 1 :=
rfl
end
variables [topological_add_group M]
open continuous_linear_map (id fst snd subtype_val mem_ker)
/-- A pair of continuous linear maps such that `f₁ ∘ f₂ = id` generates a continuous
linear equivalence `e` between `M` and `M₂ × f₁.ker` such that `(e x).2 = x` for `x ∈ f₁.ker`,
`(e x).1 = f₁ x`, and `(e (f₂ y)).2 = 0`. The map is given by `e x = (f₁ x, x - f₂ (f₁ x))`. -/
def equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ × f₁.ker :=
equiv_of_inverse (f₁.prod (f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h)) (f₂.coprod (subtype_val f₁.ker))
(λ x, by simp)
(λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp [h x])
@[simp] lemma fst_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).1 = f₁ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
((equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).2 : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_right_inverse_symm_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂ × f₁.ker) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h).symm y = f₂ y.1 + y.2 := rfl
end ring
end continuous_linear_equiv
namespace submodule
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
open continuous_linear_map
/-- A submodule `p` is called *complemented* if there exists a continuous projection `M →ₗ[R] p`. -/
def closed_complemented (p : submodule R M) : Prop := ∃ f : M →L[R] p, ∀ x : p, f x = x
lemma closed_complemented.has_closed_complement {p : submodule R M} [t1_space p]
(h : closed_complemented p) :
∃ (q : submodule R M) (hq : is_closed (q : set M)), is_compl p q :=
exists.elim h $ λ f hf, ⟨f.ker, f.is_closed_ker, linear_map.is_compl_of_proj hf⟩
protected lemma closed_complemented.is_closed [topological_add_group M] [t1_space M]
{p : submodule R M} (h : closed_complemented p) :
is_closed (p : set M) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f, hf⟩,
have : ker (id R M - (subtype_val p).comp f) = p := linear_map.ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj hf,
exact this ▸ (is_closed_ker _)
end
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_bot : closed_complemented (⊥ : submodule R M) :=
⟨0, λ x, by simp only [zero_apply, eq_zero_of_bot_submodule x]⟩
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_top : closed_complemented (⊤ : submodule R M) :=
⟨(id R M).cod_restrict ⊤ (λ x, trivial), λ x, subtype.ext_iff_val.2 $ by simp⟩
end submodule
lemma continuous_linear_map.closed_complemented_ker_of_right_inverse {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
[topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
f₁.ker.closed_complemented :=
⟨f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h, f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem f₂ h⟩
|
861d9bf953dfde8690fc1239ee4aef95347eb43c | abd85493667895c57a7507870867b28124b3998f | /src/category_theory/fully_faithful.lean | 22672639a22a0fffe537f7804d7fa3bc25da99a1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pechersky/mathlib | d56eef16bddb0bfc8bc552b05b7270aff5944393 | f1df14c2214ee114c9738e733efd5de174deb95d | refs/heads/master | 1,666,714,392,571 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 270,557,274 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,591,597,975,000 | 1,591,597,974,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,454 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import logic.function.basic
import category_theory.natural_isomorphism
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/--
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is full if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is surjective.
In fact, we use a constructive definition, so the `full F` typeclass contains data,
specifying a particular preimage of each `f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y`.
-/
class full (F : C ⥤ D) :=
(preimage : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : (F.obj X) ⟶ (F.obj Y)), X ⟶ Y)
(witness' : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : (F.obj X) ⟶ (F.obj Y)), F.map (preimage f) = f . obviously)
restate_axiom full.witness'
attribute [simp] full.witness
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is faithful if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is injective.-/
class faithful (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop :=
(injectivity' [] : ∀ {X Y : C}, function.injective (@functor.map _ _ _ _ F X Y) . obviously)
restate_axiom faithful.injectivity'
namespace functor
lemma injectivity (F : C ⥤ D) [faithful F] {X Y : C} :
function.injective $ @functor.map _ _ _ _ F X Y :=
faithful.injectivity F
/-- The specified preimage of a morphism under a full functor. -/
def preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [full F] {X Y : C} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
full.preimage.{v₁ v₂} f
@[simp] lemma image_preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [full F] {X Y : C} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
F.map (preimage F f) = f :=
by unfold preimage; obviously
end functor
variables {F : C ⥤ D} [full F] [faithful F] {X Y Z : C}
@[simp] lemma preimage_id : F.preimage (𝟙 (F.obj X)) = 𝟙 X :=
F.injectivity (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_comp (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) (g : F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj Z) :
F.preimage (f ≫ g) = F.preimage f ≫ F.preimage g :=
F.injectivity (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_map (f : X ⟶ Y) :
F.preimage (F.map f) = f :=
F.injectivity (by simp)
/-- If `F : C ⥤ D` is fully faithful, every isomorphism `F.obj X ≅ F.obj Y` has a preimage. -/
def preimage_iso (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) : X ≅ Y :=
{ hom := F.preimage f.hom,
inv := F.preimage f.inv,
hom_inv_id' := F.injectivity (by simp),
inv_hom_id' := F.injectivity (by simp), }
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_hom (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) :
(preimage_iso f).hom = F.preimage f.hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_inv (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) :
(preimage_iso f).inv = F.preimage (f.inv) := rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_map_iso (f : X ≅ Y) : preimage_iso (F.map_iso f) = f :=
by tidy
variables (F)
def is_iso_of_fully_faithful (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso (F.map f)] : is_iso f :=
{ inv := F.preimage (inv (F.map f)),
hom_inv_id' := F.injectivity (by simp),
inv_hom_id' := F.injectivity (by simp) }
end category_theory
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
instance full.id : full (𝟭 C) :=
{ preimage := λ _ _ f, f }
instance faithful.id : faithful (𝟭 C) := by obviously
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D] {E : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} E]
variables (F F' : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
instance faithful.comp [faithful F] [faithful G] : faithful (F ⋙ G) :=
{ injectivity' := λ _ _ _ _ p, F.injectivity (G.injectivity p) }
lemma faithful.of_comp [faithful $ F ⋙ G] : faithful F :=
{ injectivity' := λ X Y, (F ⋙ G).injectivity.of_comp }
section
variables {F F'}
lemma faithful.of_iso [faithful F] (α : F ≅ F') : faithful F' :=
{ injectivity' := λ X Y f f' h, F.injectivity
(by rw [←nat_iso.naturality_1 α.symm, h, nat_iso.naturality_1 α.symm]) }
end
variables {F G}
lemma faithful.of_comp_iso {H : C ⥤ E} [ℋ : faithful H] (h : F ⋙ G ≅ H) : faithful F :=
@faithful.of_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ F G (faithful.of_iso h.symm)
alias faithful.of_comp_iso ← category_theory.iso.faithful_of_comp
-- We could prove this from `faithful.of_comp_iso` using `eq_to_iso`,
-- but that would introduce a cyclic import.
lemma faithful.of_comp_eq {H : C ⥤ E} [ℋ : faithful H] (h : F ⋙ G = H) : faithful F :=
@faithful.of_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ F G (h.symm ▸ ℋ)
alias faithful.of_comp_eq ← eq.faithful_of_comp
variables (F G)
/-- “Divide” a functor by a faithful functor. -/
protected def faithful.div (F : C ⥤ E) (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
C ⥤ D :=
{ obj := obj,
map := @map,
map_id' :=
begin
assume X,
apply G.injectivity,
apply eq_of_heq,
transitivity F.map (𝟙 X), from h_map,
rw [F.map_id, G.map_id, h_obj X]
end,
map_comp' :=
begin
assume X Y Z f g,
apply G.injectivity,
apply eq_of_heq,
transitivity F.map (f ≫ g), from h_map,
rw [F.map_comp, G.map_comp],
congr' 1;
try { exact (h_obj _).symm };
exact h_map.symm
end }
-- This follows immediately from `functor.hext` (`functor.hext h_obj @h_map`),
-- but importing `category_theory.eq_to_hom` causes an import loop:
-- category_theory.eq_to_hom → category_theory.opposites →
-- category_theory.equivalence → category_theory.fully_faithful
lemma faithful.div_comp (F : C ⥤ E) [faithful F] (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
(faithful.div F G obj @h_obj @map @h_map) ⋙ G = F :=
begin
tactic.unfreeze_local_instances,
cases F with F_obj _ _ _; cases G with G_obj _ _ _,
unfold faithful.div functor.comp,
unfold_projs at h_obj,
have: F_obj = G_obj ∘ obj := (funext h_obj).symm,
subst this,
congr,
funext,
exact eq_of_heq h_map
end
lemma faithful.div_faithful (F : C ⥤ E) [faithful F] (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
faithful (faithful.div F G obj @h_obj @map @h_map) :=
(faithful.div_comp F G _ h_obj _ @h_map).faithful_of_comp
instance full.comp [full F] [full G] : full (F ⋙ G) :=
{ preimage := λ _ _ f, F.preimage (G.preimage f) }
end category_theory
|
7c35a064f43645070cde6b7148ac4241a59ce680 | ce6917c5bacabee346655160b74a307b4a5ab620 | /src/ch3/ex0315.lean | 83aedc001d115d351c0b91f3edc4058b32d5ccce | [] | no_license | Ailrun/Theorem_Proving_in_Lean | ae6a23f3c54d62d401314d6a771e8ff8b4132db2 | 2eb1b5caf93c6a5a555c79e9097cf2ba5a66cf68 | refs/heads/master | 1,609,838,270,467 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 240,967,761 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 77 | lean | variables p q : Prop
example (hp : p) (hnp: ¬p) : q := false.elim (hnp hp)
|
5036688b16849a34d3fb7a52aab9e72d767bc98f | 26ac254ecb57ffcb886ff709cf018390161a9225 | /src/data/polynomial/coeff.lean | ffe52898e3a2f79f5f7e12f22f954e6e115721fc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/mathlib | 42842584f584359bbe1fc8b88b3ff937c8acd72d | d0df6b81cd0920ad569158c06a3fd5abb9e63301 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,546,404,255 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 1,595,254,668,000 | 281,173,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,263,582,000 | 1,595,263,581,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,267 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.monomial
import data.finset.nat_antidiagonal
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The theorems include formulas for computing coefficients, such as
`coeff_add`, `coeff_sum`, `coeff_mul`
-/
noncomputable theory
open finsupp finset add_monoid_algebra
open_locale big_operators
namespace polynomial
universes u v
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
variables [semiring R] {p q r : polynomial R}
section coeff
lemma coeff_one (n : ℕ) : coeff (1 : polynomial R) n = if 0 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
lemma coeff_add (p q : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p + q) n = coeff p n + coeff q n := rfl
lemma coeff_sum [semiring S] (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R → polynomial S) :
coeff (p.sum f) n = p.sum (λ a b, coeff (f a b) n) := finsupp.sum_apply
@[simp] lemma coeff_smul (p : polynomial R) (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (r • p) n = r * coeff p n := finsupp.smul_apply
variable (R)
/-- The nth coefficient, as a linear map. -/
def lcoeff (n : ℕ) : polynomial R →ₗ[R] R :=
{ to_fun := λ f, coeff f n,
map_add' := λ f g, coeff_add f g n,
map_smul' := λ r p, coeff_smul p r n }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma lcoeff_apply (n : ℕ) (f : polynomial R) : lcoeff R n f = coeff f n := rfl
lemma coeff_mul (p q : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (p * q) n = ∑ x in nat.antidiagonal n, coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 :=
have hite : ∀ a : ℕ × ℕ, ite (a.1 + a.2 = n) (coeff p (a.fst) * coeff q (a.snd)) 0 ≠ 0
→ a.1 + a.2 = n, from λ a ha, by_contradiction
(λ h, absurd (eq.refl (0 : R)) (by rwa if_neg h at ha)),
calc coeff (p * q) n = ∑ a in p.support, ∑ b in q.support,
ite (a + b = n) (coeff p a * coeff q b) 0 :
by { simp only [mul_def, coeff_sum, coeff_single], refl }
... = ∑ v in p.support.product q.support, ite (v.1 + v.2 = n) (coeff p v.1 * coeff q v.2) 0 :
by rw sum_product
... = ∑ x in nat.antidiagonal n, coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 :
begin
refine sum_bij_ne_zero (λ x _ _, x)
(λ x _ hx, nat.mem_antidiagonal.2 (hite x hx)) (λ _ _ _ _ _ _ h, h)
(λ x h₁ h₂, ⟨x, _, _, rfl⟩) _,
{ rw [mem_product, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff],
exact ne_zero_and_ne_zero_of_mul h₂ },
{ rw nat.mem_antidiagonal at h₁, rwa [if_pos h₁] },
{ intros x h hx, rw [if_pos (hite x hx)] }
end
@[simp] lemma mul_coeff_zero (p q : polynomial R) : coeff (p * q) 0 = coeff p 0 * coeff q 0 :=
by simp [coeff_mul]
lemma coeff_mul_X_zero (p : polynomial R) : coeff (p * X) 0 = 0 :=
by simp
lemma coeff_X_mul_zero (p : polynomial R) : coeff (X * p) 0 = 0 :=
by simp
lemma coeff_C_mul_X (x : R) (k n : ℕ) :
coeff (C x * X^k : polynomial R) n = if n = k then x else 0 :=
by rw [← single_eq_C_mul_X]; simp [monomial, single, eq_comm, coeff]; congr
@[simp] lemma coeff_C_mul (p : polynomial R) : coeff (C a * p) n = a * coeff p n :=
begin
conv in (a * _) { rw [← @sum_single _ _ _ p, coeff_sum] },
rw [mul_def, ←monomial_zero_left, monomial, sum_single_index],
{ simp only [coeff_single, finsupp.mul_sum, coeff_sum],
apply sum_congr rfl,
assume i hi, by_cases i = n; simp [h] },
{ simp [finsupp.sum] }
end
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_C (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff (p * C a) n = coeff p n * a :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [← @finsupp.sum_single _ _ _ p, coeff_sum] },
rw [mul_def, ←monomial_zero_left], simp_rw [sum_single_index],
{ simp only [coeff_single, finsupp.sum_mul, coeff_sum],
apply sum_congr rfl,
assume i hi, by_cases i = n; simp [h], },
end
lemma monomial_one_eq_X_pow : ∀{n}, monomial n (1 : R) = X^n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) :=
calc monomial (n + 1) (1 : R) = monomial n 1 * X : by rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
... = X^n * X : by rw [monomial_one_eq_X_pow]
... = X^(n+1) : by simp only [pow_add, pow_one]
lemma monomial_eq_smul_X {n} : monomial n (a : R) = a • X^n :=
begin
calc monomial n a = monomial n (a * 1) : by simp
... = a • monomial n 1 : (smul_single' _ _ _).symm
... = a • X^n : by rw monomial_one_eq_X_pow
end
lemma coeff_X_pow (k n : ℕ) :
coeff (X^k : polynomial R) n = if n = k then 1 else 0 :=
by rw [← monomial_one_eq_X_pow]; simp [monomial, single, eq_comm, coeff]; congr
@[simp]
lemma coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) :
coeff (X^n : polynomial R) n = 1 :=
by simp [coeff_X_pow]
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow (p : polynomial R) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff (p * polynomial.X ^ n) (d + n) = coeff p d :=
begin
rw [coeff_mul, sum_eq_single (d,n), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, mul_one],
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ h1 h2, rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero], rintro rfl, apply h2,
rw [nat.mem_antidiagonal, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1, subst h1 },
{ exact λ h1, (h1 (nat.mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim }
end
@[simp] theorem coeff_mul_X (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (p * X) (n + 1) = coeff p n :=
by simpa only [pow_one] using coeff_mul_X_pow p 1 n
theorem mul_X_pow_eq_zero {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ}
(H : p * X ^ n = 0) : p = 0 :=
ext $ λ k, (coeff_mul_X_pow p n k).symm.trans $ ext_iff.1 H (k+n)
end coeff
end polynomial
|
a2d29ce6d333e4fbb11e6da3351d6aeed510befa | a047a4718edfa935d17231e9e6ecec8c7b701e05 | /src/field_theory/splitting_field.lean | 5b91a3dd6dade1ec6f8f58a5a9beee9070464fdb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | utensil-contrib/mathlib | bae0c9fafe5e2bdb516efc89d6f8c1502ecc9767 | b91909e77e219098a2f8cc031f89d595fe274bd2 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,048,976,965 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 1,592,442,701,000 | 273,197,855 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,592,472,812,000 | 1,592,472,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,905 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
Definition of splitting fields, and definition of homomorphism into any field that splits
-/
import data.polynomial
import ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace polynomial
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators
variables [field α] [field β] [field γ]
open polynomial
section splits
variables (i : α →+* β)
/-- a polynomial `splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1 -/
def splits (f : polynomial α) : Prop :=
f = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : polynomial β}, irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
@[simp] lemma splits_zero : splits i (0 : polynomial α) := or.inl rfl
@[simp] lemma splits_C (a : α) : splits i (C a) :=
if ha : a = 0 then ha.symm ▸ (@C_0 α _).symm ▸ splits_zero i
else
have hia : i a ≠ 0, from mt ((is_add_group_hom.injective_iff i).1
i.injective _) ha,
or.inr $ λ g hg ⟨p, hp⟩, absurd hg.1 (classical.not_not.2 (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 $
by have := congr_arg degree hp;
simp [degree_C hia, @eq_comm (with_bot ℕ) 0,
nat.with_bot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this; clear _fun_match; tautology))
lemma splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : polynomial α} (hf : degree f = 1) : splits i f :=
or.inr $ λ g hg ⟨p, hp⟩,
by have := congr_arg degree hp;
simp [nat.with_bot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (with_bot ℕ) 1,
mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this;
clear _fun_match; tauto
lemma splits_of_degree_le_one {f : polynomial α} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : splits i f :=
begin
cases h : degree f with n,
{ rw [degree_eq_bot.1 h]; exact splits_zero i },
{ cases n with n,
{ rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (trans_rel_right (≤) h (le_refl _))];
exact splits_C _ _ },
{ have hn : n = 0,
{ rw h at hf,
cases n, { refl }, { exact absurd hf dec_trivial } },
exact splits_of_degree_eq_one _ (by rw [h, hn]; refl) } }
end
lemma splits_mul {f g : polynomial α} (hf : splits i f) (hg : splits i g) : splits i (f * g) :=
if h : f * g = 0 then by simp [h]
else or.inr $ λ p hp hpf, ((principal_ideal_domain.irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g, by convert hpf; rw polynomial.map_mul)).elim
(hf.resolve_left (λ hf, by simpa [hf] using h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (λ hg, by simpa [hg] using h) hp)
lemma splits_of_splits_mul {f g : polynomial α} (hfg : f * g ≠ 0) (h : splits i (f * g)) :
splits i f ∧ splits i g :=
⟨or.inr $ λ g hgi hg, or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw map_mul; exact dvd.trans hg (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
or.inr $ λ g hgi hg, or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw map_mul; exact dvd.trans hg (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
lemma splits_map_iff (j : β →+* γ) {f : polynomial α} :
splits j (f.map i) ↔ splits (j.comp i) f :=
by simp [splits, polynomial.map_map]
theorem splits_one : splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : α} : (X - C x).splits i :=
splits_of_degree_eq_one _ $ degree_X_sub_C x
theorem splits_id_iff_splits {f : polynomial α} :
(f.map i).splits (ring_hom.id β) ↔ f.splits i :=
by rw [splits_map_iff, ring_hom.id_comp]
theorem splits_mul_iff {f g : polynomial α} (hf : f ≠ 0) (hg : g ≠ 0) :
(f * g).splits i ↔ f.splits i ∧ g.splits i :=
⟨splits_of_splits_mul i (mul_ne_zero hf hg), λ ⟨hfs, hgs⟩, splits_mul i hfs hgs⟩
theorem splits_prod {ι : Type w} {s : ι → polynomial α} {t : finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).splits i) → (∏ x in t, s x).splits i :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on t (λ _, splits_one i) (λ a t hat ih ht, _),
rw finset.forall_mem_insert at ht, rw finset.prod_insert hat,
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
end
theorem splits_prod_iff {ι : Type w} {s : ι → polynomial α} {t : finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, s j ≠ 0) → ((∏ x in t, s x).splits i ↔ ∀ j ∈ t, (s j).splits i) :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on t (λ _, ⟨λ _ _ h, h.elim, λ _, splits_one i⟩) (λ a t hat ih ht, _),
rw finset.forall_mem_insert at ht ⊢,
rw [finset.prod_insert hat, splits_mul_iff i ht.1 (finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 ht.2), ih ht.2]
end
lemma exists_root_of_splits {f : polynomial α} (hs : splits i f) (hf0 : degree f ≠ 0) :
∃ x, eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then ⟨37, by simp [hf0]⟩
else
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := is_noetherian_ring.exists_irreducible_factor
(show ¬ is_unit (f.map i), from mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 (by rwa degree_map))
(by rw [ne.def, map_eq_zero]; exact hf0) in
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (hs.resolve_left hf0 hg.1 hg.2) in
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg.2 in
⟨x, by rw [← eval_map, hi, eval_mul, show _ = _, from hx, zero_mul]⟩
lemma exists_multiset_of_splits {f : polynomial α} : splits i f →
∃ (s : multiset β), f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) *
(s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod :=
suffices splits (ring_hom.id _) (f.map i) → ∃ s : multiset β, f.map i =
(C (f.map i).leading_coeff) * (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod,
by rwa [splits_map_iff, leading_coeff_map i] at this,
is_noetherian_ring.irreducible_induction_on (f.map i)
(λ _, ⟨{37}, by simp [i.map_zero]⟩)
(λ u hu _, ⟨0,
by conv_lhs { rw eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu) };
simp [leading_coeff, nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu)]⟩)
(λ f p hf0 hp ih hfs,
have hpf0 : p * f ≠ 0, from mul_ne_zero hp.ne_zero hf0,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := ih (splits_of_splits_mul _ hpf0 hfs).2 in
⟨-(p * norm_unit p).coeff 0 :: s,
have hp1 : degree p = 1, from hfs.resolve_left hpf0 hp (by simp),
begin
rw [multiset.map_cons, multiset.prod_cons, leading_coeff_mul, C_mul, mul_assoc,
mul_left_comm (C f.leading_coeff), ← hs, ← mul_assoc, domain.mul_left_inj hf0],
conv_lhs {rw eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hp1},
simp only [mul_add, coe_norm_unit hp.ne_zero, mul_comm p, coeff_neg,
C_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg, coeff_C_mul, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, C_mul.symm,
mul_inv_cancel (show p.leading_coeff ≠ 0, from mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1
hp.ne_zero), one_mul],
end⟩)
section UFD
local attribute [instance, priority 10] principal_ideal_domain.to_unique_factorization_domain
local infix ` ~ᵤ ` : 50 := associated
open unique_factorization_domain associates
lemma splits_of_exists_multiset {f : polynomial α} {s : multiset β}
(hs : f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) * (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod) :
splits i f :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then or.inl hf0
else
or.inr $ λ p hp hdp,
have ht : multiset.rel associated
(factors (f.map i)) (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)) :=
unique
(λ p hp, irreducible_factors (mt (map_eq_zero i).1 hf0) _ hp)
(λ p' m, begin
obtain ⟨a,m,rfl⟩ := multiset.mem_map.1 m,
exact irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (degree_X_sub_C _),
end)
(associated.symm $ calc _ ~ᵤ f.map i :
⟨(units.map' C : units β →* units (polynomial β)) (units.mk0 (f.map i).leading_coeff
(mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 (mt (map_eq_zero i).1 hf0))),
by conv_rhs {rw [hs, ← leading_coeff_map i, mul_comm]}; refl⟩
... ~ᵤ _ : associated.symm (unique_factorization_domain.factors_prod (by simpa using hf0))),
let ⟨q, hq, hpq⟩ := exists_mem_factors_of_dvd (by simpa) hp hdp in
let ⟨q', hq', hqq'⟩ := multiset.exists_mem_of_rel_of_mem ht hq in
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := multiset.mem_map.1 hq' in
by rw [← degree_X_sub_C a, ha.2];
exact degree_eq_degree_of_associated (hpq.trans hqq')
lemma splits_of_splits_id {f : polynomial α} : splits (ring_hom.id _) f → splits i f :=
unique_factorization_domain.induction_on_prime f (λ _, splits_zero _)
(λ _ hu _, splits_of_degree_le_one _
((is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu).symm ▸ dec_trivial))
(λ a p ha0 hp ih hfi, splits_mul _
(splits_of_degree_eq_one _
((splits_of_splits_mul _ (mul_ne_zero hp.1 ha0) hfi).1.resolve_left
hp.1 (irreducible_of_prime hp) (by rw map_id)))
(ih (splits_of_splits_mul _ (mul_ne_zero hp.1 ha0) hfi).2))
end UFD
lemma splits_iff_exists_multiset {f : polynomial α} : splits i f ↔
∃ (s : multiset β), f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) *
(s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod :=
⟨exists_multiset_of_splits i, λ ⟨s, hs⟩, splits_of_exists_multiset i hs⟩
lemma splits_comp_of_splits (j : β →+* γ) {f : polynomial α}
(h : splits i f) : splits (j.comp i) f :=
begin
change i with ((ring_hom.id _).comp i) at h,
rw [← splits_map_iff],
rw [← splits_map_iff i] at h,
exact splits_of_splits_id _ h
end
end splits
end polynomial
|
158019ddb9cb864296516ea6d43f3315d3019192 | 690889011852559ee5ac4dfea77092de8c832e7e | /src/meta/expr.lean | a7e184993a7705481352f9e66e0b467ecd35a497 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/mathlib | f6df180148f8acc91de9ba5e558976ab40a872c7 | 1fa03c29f9f273203bbffb79d10d31f696b3d317 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,785,260,929 | 1,572,195,914,000 | 1,572,195,913,000 | 138,435,193 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,529,789,739,000 | 1,529,789,739,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,596 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison, Keeley Hoek, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.string.defs
/-!
# Additional operations on expr and related types
This file defines basic operations on the types expr, name, declaration, level, environment.
This file is mostly for non-tactics. Tactics should generally be placed in `tactic.core`.
## Tags
expr, name, declaration, level, environment, meta, metaprogramming, tactic
-/
namespace binder_info
instance : inhabited binder_info := ⟨ binder_info.default ⟩
/-- The brackets corresponding to a given binder_info. -/
def brackets : binder_info → string × string
| binder_info.implicit := ("{", "}")
| binder_info.strict_implicit := ("{{", "}}")
| binder_info.inst_implicit := ("[", "]")
| _ := ("(", ")")
end binder_info
namespace name
/-- Find the largest prefix `n` of a `name` such that `f n ≠ none`, then replace this prefix
with the value of `f n`. -/
def map_prefix (f : name → option name) : name → name
| anonymous := anonymous
| (mk_string s n') := (f (mk_string s n')).get_or_else (mk_string s $ map_prefix n')
| (mk_numeral d n') := (f (mk_numeral d n')).get_or_else (mk_numeral d $ map_prefix n')
/-- If `nm` is a simple name (having only one string component) starting with `_`, then `deinternalize_field nm` removes the underscore. Otherwise, it does nothing. -/
meta def deinternalize_field : name → name
| (mk_string s name.anonymous) :=
let i := s.mk_iterator in
if i.curr = '_' then i.next.next_to_string else s
| n := n
/-- `get_nth_prefix nm n` removes the last `n` components from `nm` -/
meta def get_nth_prefix : name → ℕ → name
| nm 0 := nm
| nm (n + 1) := get_nth_prefix nm.get_prefix n
/-- Auxilliary definition for `pop_nth_prefix` -/
private meta def pop_nth_prefix_aux : name → ℕ → name × ℕ
| anonymous n := (anonymous, 1)
| nm n := let (pfx, height) := pop_nth_prefix_aux nm.get_prefix n in
if height ≤ n then (anonymous, height + 1)
else (nm.update_prefix pfx, height + 1)
/-- Pops the top `n` prefixes from the given name. -/
meta def pop_nth_prefix (nm : name) (n : ℕ) : name :=
prod.fst $ pop_nth_prefix_aux nm n
/-- Pop the prefix of a name -/
meta def pop_prefix (n : name) : name :=
pop_nth_prefix n 1
/-- Auxilliary definition for `from_components` -/
private def from_components_aux : name → list string → name
| n [] := n
| n (s :: rest) := from_components_aux (name.mk_string s n) rest
/-- Build a name from components. For example `from_components ["foo","bar"]` becomes
``` `foo.bar``` -/
def from_components : list string → name :=
from_components_aux name.anonymous
/-- `name`s can contain numeral pieces, which are not legal names
when typed/passed directly to the parser. We turn an arbitrary
name into a legal identifier name by turning the numbers to strings. -/
meta def sanitize_name : name → name
| name.anonymous := name.anonymous
| (name.mk_string s p) := name.mk_string s $ sanitize_name p
| (name.mk_numeral s p) := name.mk_string sformat!"n{s}" $ sanitize_name p
/-- Append a string to the last component of a name -/
def append_suffix : name → string → name
| (mk_string s n) s' := mk_string (s ++ s') n
| n _ := n
/-- The first component of a name, turning a number to a string -/
meta def head : name → string
| (mk_string s anonymous) := s
| (mk_string s p) := head p
| (mk_numeral n p) := head p
| anonymous := "[anonymous]"
/-- Tests whether the first component of a name is `"_private"` -/
meta def is_private (n : name) : bool :=
n.head = "_private"
/-- Get the last component of a name, and convert it to a string. -/
meta def last : name → string
| (mk_string s _) := s
| (mk_numeral n _) := repr n
| anonymous := "[anonymous]"
/-- Returns the number of characters used to print all the string components of a name,
including periods between name segments. Ignores numerical parts of a name. -/
meta def length : name → ℕ
| (mk_string s anonymous) := s.length
| (mk_string s p) := s.length + 1 + p.length
| (mk_numeral n p) := p.length
| anonymous := "[anonymous]".length
/-- checks whether `nm` has a prefix (including itself) such that P is true -/
def has_prefix (P : name → bool) : name → bool
| anonymous := ff
| (mk_string s nm) := P (mk_string s nm) ∨ has_prefix nm
| (mk_numeral s nm) := P (mk_numeral s nm) ∨ has_prefix nm
end name
namespace level
/-- Tests whether a universe level is non-zero for all assignments of its variables -/
meta def nonzero : level → bool
| (succ _) := tt
| (max l₁ l₂) := l₁.nonzero || l₂.nonzero
| (imax _ l₂) := l₂.nonzero
| _ := ff
end level
/- converting between expressions and numerals -/
/--
`nat.mk_numeral n` embeds `n` as a numeral expression inside a type with 0, 1, and +.
`type`: an expression representing the target type. This must live in Type 0.
`has_zero`, `has_one`, `has_add`: expressions of the type `has_zero %%type`, etc.
-/
meta def nat.mk_numeral (type has_zero has_one has_add : expr) : ℕ → expr :=
let z : expr := `(@has_zero.zero.{0} %%type %%has_zero),
o : expr := `(@has_one.one.{0} %%type %%has_one) in
nat.binary_rec z
(λ b n e, if n = 0 then o else
if b then `(@bit1.{0} %%type %%has_one %%has_add %%e)
else `(@bit0.{0} %%type %%has_add %%e))
/--
`int.mk_numeral z` embeds `z` as a numeral expression inside a type with 0, 1, +, and -.
`type`: an expression representing the target type. This must live in Type 0.
`has_zero`, `has_one`, `has_add`, `has_neg`: expressions of the type `has_zero %%type`, etc.
-/
meta def int.mk_numeral (type has_zero has_one has_add has_neg : expr) : ℤ → expr
| (int.of_nat n) := n.mk_numeral type has_zero has_one has_add
| -[1+n] := let ne := (n+1).mk_numeral type has_zero has_one has_add in
`(@has_neg.neg.{0} %%type %%has_neg %%ne)
namespace expr
/-- Turns an expression into a positive natural number, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0` and `bit1`. -/
protected meta def to_pos_nat : expr → option ℕ
| `(has_one.one _) := some 1
| `(bit0 %%e) := bit0 <$> e.to_pos_nat
| `(bit1 %%e) := bit1 <$> e.to_pos_nat
| _ := none
/-- Turns an expression into a natural number, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0`, `bit1` and `has_zero.zero`. -/
protected meta def to_nat : expr → option ℕ
| `(has_zero.zero _) := some 0
| e := e.to_pos_nat
/-- Turns an expression into a integer, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0`, `bit1`, `has_zero.zero` and a optionally a single `has_neg.neg` as head. -/
protected meta def to_int : expr → option ℤ
| `(has_neg.neg %%e) := do n ← e.to_nat, some (-n)
| e := coe <$> e.to_nat
end expr
namespace expr
open tactic
/-- Apply a function to each constant (inductive type, defined function etc) in an expression. -/
protected meta def apply_replacement_fun (f : name → name) (e : expr) : expr :=
e.replace $ λ e d,
match e with
| expr.const n ls := some $ expr.const (f n) ls
| _ := none
end
/-- Tests whether an expression is a meta-variable. -/
meta def is_mvar : expr → bool
| (mvar _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Tests whether an expression is a sort. -/
meta def is_sort : expr → bool
| (sort _) := tt
| e := ff
/-- Returns a list of all local constants in an expression (without duplicates). -/
meta def list_local_consts (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_local_constant then insert e' es else es)
/-- Returns a name_set of all constants in an expression. -/
meta def list_constant (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_constant then es.insert e'.const_name else es)
/-- Returns a list of all meta-variables in an expression (without duplicates). -/
meta def list_meta_vars (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_mvar then insert e' es else es)
/-- Returns a name_set of all constants in an expression starting with a certain prefix. -/
meta def list_names_with_prefix (pre : name) (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set $ λ e' _ l,
match e' with
| expr.const n _ := if n.get_prefix = pre then l.insert n else l
| _ := l
end
/-- Returns true if `e` contains a name `n` where `p n` is true.
Returns `true` if `p name.anonymous` is true -/
meta def contains_constant (e : expr) (p : name → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : bool :=
e.fold ff (λ e' _ b, if p (e'.const_name) then tt else b)
/--
is_num_eq n1 n2 returns true if n1 and n2 are both numerals with the same numeral structure,
ignoring differences in type and type class arguments.
-/
meta def is_num_eq : expr → expr → bool
| `(@has_zero.zero _ _) `(@has_zero.zero _ _) := tt
| `(@has_one.one _ _) `(@has_one.one _ _) := tt
| `(bit0 %%a) `(bit0 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(bit1 %%a) `(bit1 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(-%%a) `(-%%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(%%a/%%a') `(%%b/%%b') := a.is_num_eq b
| _ _ := ff
/-- Simplifies the expression `t` with the specified options.
The result is `(new_e, pr)` with the new expression `new_e` and a proof
`pr : e = new_e`. -/
meta def simp (t : expr)
(cfg : simp_config := {}) (discharger : tactic unit := failed)
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic (expr × expr) :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
simplify s to_unfold t cfg `eq discharger
/-- Definitionally simplifies the expression `t` with the specified options.
The result is the simplified expression. -/
meta def dsimp (t : expr)
(cfg : dsimp_config := {})
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic expr :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
s.dsimplify to_unfold t cfg
/-- Auxilliary definition for `expr.pi_arity` -/
meta def pi_arity_aux : ℕ → expr → ℕ
| n (pi _ _ _ b) := pi_arity_aux (n + 1) b
| n e := n
/-- The arity of a pi-type. Does not perform any reduction of the expression.
In one application this was ~30 times quicker than `tactic.get_pi_arity`. -/
meta def pi_arity : expr → ℕ :=
pi_arity_aux 0
/-- Get the names of the bound variables by a sequence of pis or lambdas. -/
meta def binding_names : expr → list name
| (pi n _ _ e) := n :: e.binding_names
| (lam n _ _ e) := n :: e.binding_names
| e := []
/-- Instantiate lambdas in the second argument by expressions from the first. -/
meta def instantiate_lambdas : list expr → expr → expr
| (e'::es) (lam n bi t e) := instantiate_lambdas es (e.instantiate_var e')
| _ e := e
/-- Instantiate lambdas in the second argument `e` by expressions from the first argument `es`.
If the length of `es` is larger than the number of lambdas in `e`,
then the term is applied to the remaining terms -/
meta def instantiate_lambdas_or_apps : list expr → expr → expr
| (e'::es) (lam n bi t e) := instantiate_lambdas_or_apps es (e.instantiate_var e')
| es e := mk_app e es
end expr
namespace environment
/-- Tests whether a name is declared in the current file. Fixes an error in `in_current_file`
which returns `tt` for the four names `quot, quot.mk, quot.lift, quot.ind` -/
meta def in_current_file' (env : environment) (n : name) : bool :=
env.in_current_file n && (n ∉ [``quot, ``quot.mk, ``quot.lift, ``quot.ind])
/-- Tests whether `n` is an inductive type with one constructor without indices.
If so, returns the number of paramaters and the name of the constructor.
Otherwise, returns `none`. -/
meta def is_structure_like (env : environment) (n : name) : option (nat × name) :=
do guardb (env.is_inductive n),
d ← (env.get n).to_option,
[intro] ← pure (env.constructors_of n) | none,
guard (env.inductive_num_indices n = 0),
some (env.inductive_num_params n, intro)
/-- Tests whether `n` is a structure.
It will first test whether `n` is structure-like and then test that the first projection is
defined in the environment and is a projection. -/
meta def is_structure (env : environment) (n : name) : bool :=
option.is_some $ do
(nparams, intro) ← env.is_structure_like n,
di ← (env.get intro).to_option,
expr.pi x _ _ _ ← nparams.iterate
(λ e : option expr, do expr.pi _ _ _ body ← e | none, some body)
(some di.type) | none,
env.is_projection (n ++ x.deinternalize_field)
/-- Get all projections of the structure `n`. Returns `none` if `n` is not structure-like.
If `n` is not a structure, but is structure-like, this does not check whether the names
are existing declarations. -/
meta def get_projections (env : environment) (n : name) : option (list name) := do
(nparams, intro) ← env.is_structure_like n,
di ← (env.get intro).to_option,
tgt ← nparams.iterate
(λ e : option expr, do expr.pi _ _ _ body ← e | none, some body)
(some di.type) | none,
return $ tgt.binding_names.map (λ x, n ++ x.deinternalize_field)
/-- Tests whether `nm` is a generalized inductive type that is not a normal inductive type.
Note that `is_ginductive` returns `tt` even on regular inductive types.
This returns `tt` if `nm` is (part of a) mutually defined inductive type or a nested inductive
type. -/
meta def is_ginductive' (e : environment) (nm : name) : bool :=
e.is_ginductive nm ∧ ¬ e.is_inductive nm
/-- For all declarations `d` where `f d = some x` this adds `x` to the returned list. -/
meta def decl_filter_map {α : Type} (e : environment) (f : declaration → option α) : list α :=
e.fold [] $ λ d l, match f d with
| some r := r :: l
| none := l
end
/-- Maps `f` to all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def decl_map {α : Type} (e : environment) (f : declaration → α) : list α :=
e.decl_filter_map $ λ d, some (f d)
/-- Lists all declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_decls (e : environment) : list declaration :=
e.decl_map id
/-- Lists all trusted (non-meta) declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_trusted_decls (e : environment) : list declaration :=
e.decl_filter_map (λ d, if d.is_trusted then some d else none)
/-- Lists the name of all declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_decl_names (e : environment) : list name :=
e.decl_map declaration.to_name
/-- Fold a monad over all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def mfold {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [monad m] (e : environment) (x : α)
(fn : declaration → α → m α) : m α :=
e.fold (return x) (λ d t, t >>= fn d)
/-- Filters all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def mfilter (e : environment) (test : declaration → tactic bool) : tactic (list declaration) :=
e.mfold [] $ λ d ds, do b ← test d, return $ if b then d::ds else ds
/-- Checks whether `s` is a prefix of the file where `n` is declared.
This is used to check whether `n` is declared in mathlib, where `s` is the mathlib directory. -/
meta def is_prefix_of_file (e : environment) (s : string) (n : name) : bool :=
s.is_prefix_of $ (e.decl_olean n).get_or_else ""
end environment
namespace expr
/- In this section we define the tactic `is_eta_expansion` which checks whether an expression
is an eta-expansion of a structure. (not to be confused with eta-expanion for `λ`). -/
open tactic
/-- Checks whether for all elements `(nm, val)` in the list we have `val = nm.{univs} args` -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_of (args : list expr) (univs : list level) (l : list (name × expr)) :
bool :=
l.all $ λ⟨proj, val⟩, val = (const proj univs).mk_app args
/-- Checks whether there is an expression `e` such that for all elements `(nm, val)` in the list
`val = nm ... e` where `...` denotes the same list of parameters for all applications.
Returns e if it exists. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_test : list (name × expr) → option expr
| [] := none
| (⟨proj, val⟩::l) :=
match val.get_app_fn with
| (const nm univs : expr) :=
if nm = proj then
let args := val.get_app_args in
let e := args.ilast in
if is_eta_expansion_of args univs l then some e else none
else
none
| _ := none
end
/-- Checks whether there is an expression `e` such that for all *non-propositional* elements
`(nm, val)` in the list `val = e ... nm` where `...` denotes the same list of parameters for all
applications. Also checks whether the resulting expression unifies with the given one -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_aux (val : expr) (l : list (name × expr)) : tactic (option expr) :=
do l' ← l.mfilter (λ⟨proj, val⟩, bnot <$> is_proof val),
match is_eta_expansion_test l' with
| some e := option.map (λ _, e) <$> try_core (unify e val)
| none := return none
end
/-- Checks whether there is an expression `e` such that `val` is the eta-expansion of `e`.
This assumes that `val` is a fully-applied application of the constructor of a structure.
This is useful to reduce expressions generated by the notation
`{ field_1 := _, ..other_structure }`
If `other_structure` is itself a field of the structure, then the elaborator will insert an
eta-expanded version of `other_structure`. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion (val : expr) : tactic (option expr) := do
e ← get_env,
type ← infer_type val,
projs ← e.get_projections type.get_app_fn.const_name,
let args := (val.get_app_args).drop type.get_app_args.length,
is_eta_expansion_aux val (projs.zip args)
end expr
namespace declaration
open tactic
protected meta def update_with_fun (f : name → name) (tgt : name) (decl : declaration) :
declaration :=
let decl := decl.update_name $ tgt in
let decl := decl.update_type $ decl.type.apply_replacement_fun f in
decl.update_value $ decl.value.apply_replacement_fun f
/-- Checks whether the declaration is declared in the current file.
This is a simple wrapper around `environment.in_current_file'`
Use `environment.in_current_file'` instead if performance matters. -/
meta def in_current_file (d : declaration) : tactic bool :=
do e ← get_env, return $ e.in_current_file' d.to_name
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a theorem -/
meta def is_theorem : declaration → bool
| (thm _ _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a constant -/
meta def is_constant : declaration → bool
| (cnst _ _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a axiom -/
meta def is_axiom : declaration → bool
| (ax _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is automatically generated in the environment.
There is no cheap way to check whether a declaration in the namespace of a generalized
inductive type is automatically generated, so for now we say that all of them are automatically
generated. -/
meta def is_auto_generated (e : environment) (d : declaration) : bool :=
e.is_constructor d.to_name ∨
(e.is_projection d.to_name).is_some ∨
(e.is_constructor d.to_name.get_prefix ∧
d.to_name.last ∈ ["inj", "inj_eq", "sizeof_spec", "inj_arrow"]) ∨
(e.is_inductive d.to_name.get_prefix ∧
d.to_name.last ∈ ["below", "binduction_on", "brec_on", "cases_on", "dcases_on", "drec_on", "drec",
"rec", "rec_on", "no_confusion", "no_confusion_type", "sizeof", "ibelow", "has_sizeof_inst"]) ∨
d.to_name.has_prefix (λ nm, e.is_ginductive' nm)
/-- Returns the list of universe levels of a declaration. -/
meta def univ_levels (d : declaration) : list level :=
d.univ_params.map level.param
end declaration
/-- The type of binders containing a name, the binding info and the binding type -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
meta structure binder :=
(name : name)
(info : binder_info)
(type : expr)
namespace binder
/-- Turn a binder into a string. Uses expr.to_string for the type. -/
protected meta def to_string (b : binder) : string :=
let (l, r) := b.info.brackets in
l ++ b.name.to_string ++ " : " ++ b.type.to_string ++ r
open tactic
meta instance : inhabited binder := ⟨⟨default _, default _, default _⟩⟩
meta instance : has_to_string binder := ⟨ binder.to_string ⟩
meta instance : has_to_format binder := ⟨ λ b, b.to_string ⟩
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format binder :=
⟨ λ b, let (l, r) := b.info.brackets in
(λ e, l ++ b.name.to_string ++ " : " ++ e ++ r) <$> pp b.type ⟩
end binder
|
ffc3bc82bc62f73e0c50d28ba3a3f462bdf39f67 | e5c11e5a7d990ce404047c2bd848eeafac3c0a85 | /src/defs.lean | df42a970c9eec179f8b4df5ba314af4ca5231782 | [
"LPPL-1.3c"
] | permissive | lean-forward/class-number | 9ec63c24845e46efc8fa8b15324d0815918292c7 | 4fccf36d5e0e16accae84c16df77a3839ad964e4 | refs/heads/main | 1,686,927,014,542 | 1,624,886,724,000 | 1,624,886,724,000 | 327,319,245 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,971 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.equiv.basic
import algebra.group.defs
import algebra.group.hom
import logic.embedding
/-!
# Definitions of group actions
This file defines a hierarchy of group action type-classes:
* `has_scalar α β`
* `mul_action α β`
* `distrib_mul_action α β`
The hierarchy is extended further by `semimodule`, defined elsewhere.
Also provided are type-classes regarding the interaction of different group actions,
* `smul_comm_class M N α`
* `is_scalar_tower M N α`
## Notation
`a • b` is used as notation for `smul a b`.
## Implementation details
This file should avoid depending on other parts of `group_theory`, to avoid import cycles.
More sophisticated lemmas belong in `group_theory.group_action`.
-/
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open function
/-- Typeclass for types with a scalar multiplication operation, denoted `•` (`\bu`) -/
class has_scalar (α : Type u) (γ : Type v) := (smul : α → γ → γ)
infixr ` • `:73 := has_scalar.smul
/-- Typeclass for multiplicative actions by monoids. This generalizes group actions. -/
@[protect_proj] class mul_action (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [monoid α] extends has_scalar α β :=
(one_smul : ∀ b : β, (1 : α) • b = b)
(mul_smul : ∀ (x y : α) (b : β), (x * y) • b = x • y • b)
/-- A typeclass mixin saying that two actions on the same space commute. -/
class smul_comm_class (M N α : Type*) [has_scalar M α] [has_scalar N α] : Prop :=
(smul_comm : ∀ (m : M) (n : N) (a : α), m • n • a = n • m • a)
export mul_action (mul_smul) smul_comm_class (smul_comm)
/-- Commutativity of actions is a symmetric relation. This lemma can't be an instance because this
would cause a loop in the instance search graph. -/
lemma smul_comm_class.symm (M N α : Type*) [has_scalar M α] [has_scalar N α]
[smul_comm_class M N α] : smul_comm_class N M α :=
⟨λ a' a b, (smul_comm a a' b).symm⟩
instance smul_comm_class_self (M α : Type*) [comm_monoid M] [mul_action M α] :
smul_comm_class M M α :=
⟨λ a a' b, by rw [← mul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul]⟩
/-- An instance of `is_scalar_tower M N α` states that the multiplicative
action of `M` on `α` is determined by the multiplicative actions of `M` on `N`
and `N` on `α`. -/
class is_scalar_tower (M N α : Type*) [has_scalar M N] [has_scalar N α] [has_scalar M α] : Prop :=
(smul_assoc : ∀ (x : M) (y : N) (z : α), (x • y) • z = x • (y • z))
@[simp] lemma smul_assoc {M N} [has_scalar M N] [has_scalar N α] [has_scalar M α]
[is_scalar_tower M N α] (x : M) (y : N) (z : α) :
(x • y) • z = x • y • z :=
is_scalar_tower.smul_assoc x y z
section
variables [monoid α] [mul_action α β]
lemma smul_smul (a₁ a₂ : α) (b : β) : a₁ • a₂ • b = (a₁ * a₂) • b := (mul_smul _ _ _).symm
variable (α)
@[simp] theorem one_smul (b : β) : (1 : α) • b = b := mul_action.one_smul _
variables {α}
/-- Pullback a multiplicative action along an injective map respecting `•`. -/
protected def function.injective.mul_action [has_scalar α γ] (f : γ → β)
(hf : injective f) (smul : ∀ (c : α) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) :
mul_action α γ :=
{ smul := (•),
one_smul := λ x, hf $ (smul _ _).trans $ one_smul _ (f x),
mul_smul := λ c₁ c₂ x, hf $ by simp only [smul, mul_smul] }
/-- Pushforward a multiplicative action along a surjective map respecting `•`. -/
protected def function.surjective.mul_action [has_scalar α γ] (f : β → γ) (hf : surjective f)
(smul : ∀ (c : α) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) :
mul_action α γ :=
{ smul := (•),
one_smul := λ y, by { rcases hf y with ⟨x, rfl⟩, rw [← smul, one_smul] },
mul_smul := λ c₁ c₂ y, by { rcases hf y with ⟨x, rfl⟩, simp only [← smul, mul_smul] } }
section ite
variables (p : Prop) [decidable p]
lemma ite_smul (a₁ a₂ : α) (b : β) : (ite p a₁ a₂) • b = ite p (a₁ • b) (a₂ • b) :=
by split_ifs; refl
lemma smul_ite (a : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) : a • (ite p b₁ b₂) = ite p (a • b₁) (a • b₂) :=
by split_ifs; refl
end ite
namespace mul_action
variables (α)
/-- The regular action of a monoid on itself by left multiplication. -/
def regular : mul_action α α :=
{ smul := λ a₁ a₂, a₁ * a₂,
one_smul := λ a, one_mul a,
mul_smul := λ a₁ a₂ a₃, mul_assoc _ _ _, }
section regular
local attribute [instance] regular
instance is_scalar_tower.left : is_scalar_tower α α β :=
⟨λ x y z, mul_smul x y z⟩
end regular
variables (α β)
/-- Embedding induced by action. -/
def to_fun : β ↪ (α → β) :=
⟨λ y x, x • y, λ y₁ y₂ H, one_smul α y₁ ▸ one_smul α y₂ ▸ by convert congr_fun H 1⟩
variables {α β}
@[simp] lemma to_fun_apply (x : α) (y : β) : mul_action.to_fun α β y x = x • y :=
rfl
variable (β)
/-- An action of `α` on `β` and a monoid homomorphism `γ → α` induce an action of `γ` on `β`. -/
def comp_hom [monoid γ] (g : γ →* α) :
mul_action γ β :=
{ smul := λ x b, (g x) • b,
one_smul := by simp [g.map_one, mul_action.one_smul],
mul_smul := by simp [g.map_mul, mul_action.mul_smul] }
end mul_action
end
section compatible_scalar
@[simp] lemma smul_one_smul {M} (N) [monoid N] [has_scalar M N] [mul_action N α] [has_scalar M α]
[is_scalar_tower M N α] (x : M) (y : α) :
(x • (1 : N)) • y = x • y :=
by rw [smul_assoc, one_smul]
end compatible_scalar
/-- Typeclass for multiplicative actions on additive structures. This generalizes group modules. -/
class distrib_mul_action (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [monoid α] [add_monoid β]
extends mul_action α β :=
(smul_add : ∀(r : α) (x y : β), r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y)
(smul_zero : ∀(r : α), r • (0 : β) = 0)
section
variables [monoid α] [add_monoid β] [distrib_mul_action α β]
theorem smul_add (a : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) : a • (b₁ + b₂) = a • b₁ + a • b₂ :=
distrib_mul_action.smul_add _ _ _
@[simp] theorem smul_zero (a : α) : a • (0 : β) = 0 :=
distrib_mul_action.smul_zero _
/-- Pullback a distributive multiplicative action along an injective additive monoid
homomorphism. -/
protected def function.injective.distrib_mul_action [add_monoid γ] [has_scalar α γ] (f : γ →+ β)
(hf : injective f) (smul : ∀ (c : α) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) :
distrib_mul_action α γ :=
{ smul := (•),
smul_add := λ c x y, hf $ by simp only [smul, f.map_add, smul_add],
smul_zero := λ c, hf $ by simp only [smul, f.map_zero, smul_zero],
.. hf.mul_action f smul }
/-- Pushforward a distributive multiplicative action along a surjective additive monoid
homomorphism.-/
protected def function.surjective.distrib_mul_action [add_monoid γ] [has_scalar α γ] (f : β →+ γ)
(hf : surjective f) (smul : ∀ (c : α) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) :
distrib_mul_action α γ :=
{ smul := (•),
smul_add := λ c x y, by { rcases hf x with ⟨x, rfl⟩, rcases hf y with ⟨y, rfl⟩,
simp only [smul_add, ← smul, ← f.map_add] },
smul_zero := λ c, by simp only [← f.map_zero, ← smul, smul_zero],
.. hf.mul_action f smul }
variable (β)
/-- Scalar multiplication by `r` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def const_smul_hom (r : α) : β →+ β :=
{ to_fun := (•) r,
map_zero' := smul_zero r,
map_add' := smul_add r }
variable {β}
@[simp] lemma const_smul_hom_apply (r : α) (x : β) :
const_smul_hom β r x = r • x := rfl
end
section
variables [monoid α] [add_group β] [distrib_mul_action α β]
@[simp] theorem smul_neg (r : α) (x : β) : r • (-x) = -(r • x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero $ by rw [← smul_add, neg_add_self, smul_zero]
theorem smul_sub (r : α) (x y : β) : r • (x - y) = r • x - r • y :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, smul_add, smul_neg]
end
|
fb17afbb87eb2932e6083d33b4bc89acf4b11234 | 0d4c30038160d9c35586ce4dace36fe26a35023b | /src/analysis/calculus/deriv.lean | a091080593086e38ef9f3f756c977700114dba22 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | b-mehta/mathlib | b0c8ec929ec638447e4262f7071570d23db52e14 | ce72cde867feabe5bb908cf9e895acc0e11bf1eb | refs/heads/master | 1,599,457,264,781 | 1,586,969,260,000 | 1,586,969,260,000 | 220,672,634 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,583,944,480,000 | 1,573,317,991,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 57,102 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.calculus.fderiv data.polynomial
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives
This file defines the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` where `𝕜` is a
normed field and `F` is a normed space over this field. The derivative of
such a function `f` at a point `x` is given by an element `f' : F`.
The theory is developed analogously to the [Fréchet
derivatives](./fderiv.lean). We first introduce predicates defined in terms
of the corresponding predicates for Fréchet derivatives:
- `has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
- `has_deriv_within_at f f' s x` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
- `has_deriv_at f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x`.
For the last two notions we also define a functional version:
- `deriv_within f s x` is a derivative of `f` at `x` within `s`. If the
derivative does not exist, then `deriv_within f s x` equals zero.
- `deriv f x` is a derivative of `f` at `x`. If the derivative does not
exist, then `deriv f x` equals zero.
The theorems `fderiv_within_deriv_within` and `fderiv_deriv` show that the
one-dimensional derivatives coincide with the general Fréchet derivatives.
We also show the existence and compute the derivatives of:
- constants
- the identity function
- linear maps
- addition
- negation
- subtraction
- multiplication
- inverse `x → x⁻¹`
- multiplication of two functions in `𝕜 → 𝕜`
- multiplication of a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` and of a function in `𝕜 → E`
- composition of a function in `𝕜 → F` with a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜`
- composition of a function in `F → E` with a function in `𝕜 → F`
- division
- polynomials
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `has_deriv_at`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
## Implementation notes
Most of the theorems are direct restatements of the corresponding theorems
for Fréchet derivatives.
-/
universes u v w
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space
open filter asymptotics set
open continuous_linear_map (smul_right smul_right_one_eq_iff)
set_option class.instance_max_depth 100
variables {𝕜 : Type u} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
section
variables {F : Type v} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
variables {E : Type w} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
/--
`f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges along the filter `L`.
-/
def has_deriv_at_filter (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) (L : filter 𝕜) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter f (smul_right 1 f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) x L
/--
`f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def has_deriv_within_at (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (s : set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x (nhds_within x s)
/--
`f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def has_deriv_at (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/--
Derivative of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', has_deriv_within_at f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv_within f s x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def deriv_within (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
(fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) 1
/--
Derivative of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', has_deriv_at f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv f x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def deriv (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) :=
(fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) 1
variables {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variables {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variables {x : 𝕜}
variables {s t : set 𝕜}
variables {L L₁ L₂ : filter 𝕜}
/-- Expressing `has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L` in terms of `has_deriv_at_filter` -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L ↔ has_deriv_at_filter f (f' 1) x L :=
by simp [has_deriv_at_filter]
/-- Expressing `has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x` in terms of `has_deriv_within_at` -/
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_iff_has_deriv_within_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x ↔ has_deriv_within_at f (f' 1) s x :=
by simp [has_deriv_within_at, has_deriv_at_filter, has_fderiv_within_at]
/-- Expressing `has_deriv_within_at f f' s x` in terms of `has_fderiv_within_at` -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at {f' : F} :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
has_fderiv_within_at f (smul_right 1 f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iff.rfl
/-- Expressing `has_fderiv_at f f' x` in terms of `has_deriv_at` -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_iff_has_deriv_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_at f f' x ↔ has_deriv_at f (f' 1) x :=
by simp [has_deriv_at, has_deriv_at_filter, has_fderiv_at]
/-- Expressing `has_deriv_at f f' x` in terms of `has_fderiv_at` -/
lemma has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at {f' : F} :
has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
has_fderiv_at f (smul_right 1 f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iff.rfl
lemma deriv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at
(h : ¬ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) : deriv_within f s x = 0 :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at, simp, assumption }
lemma deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at (h : ¬ differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) : deriv f x = 0 :=
by { unfold deriv, rw fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at, simp, assumption }
theorem unique_diff_within_at.eq_deriv (s : set 𝕜) (H : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (h₁ : has_deriv_within_at f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
smul_right_one_eq_iff.mp $ unique_diff_within_at.eq H h h₁
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L ↔
tendsto (λ x' : 𝕜, ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'∥) L (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'∥) (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto : has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
/-- If the domain has dimension one, then Fréchet derivative is equivalent to the classical
definition with a limit. In this version we have to take the limit along the subset `-{x}`,
because for `y=x` the slope equals zero due to the convention `0⁻¹=0`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} {L : filter 𝕜} :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (L ⊓ principal (-{x})) (𝓝 f') :=
begin
conv_lhs { simp only [has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto, (normed_field.norm_inv _).symm,
(norm_smul _ _).symm, tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.symm] },
conv_rhs { rw [← nhds_translation f', tendsto_comap_iff] },
refine (tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq $ by simp).symm.trans (tendsto_congr' _),
rw mem_inf_principal,
refine univ_mem_sets' (λ z hz, _),
have : z ≠ x, by simpa [function.comp] using hz,
simp only [mem_set_of_eq],
rw [smul_sub, ← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel (sub_ne_zero.2 this), one_smul]
end
lemma has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜} :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (nhds_within x (s \ {x})) (𝓝 f') :=
begin
simp only [has_deriv_within_at, nhds_within, diff_eq, inf_assoc.symm, inf_principal.symm],
exact has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto_slope
end
lemma has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope' {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜} (hs : x ∉ s) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 f') :=
begin
convert ← has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope,
exact diff_singleton_eq_self hs
end
lemma has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} :
has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (nhds_within x (-{x})) (𝓝 f') :=
has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto_slope
theorem has_deriv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero : has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
is_o (λh, f (x + h) - f x - h • f') (λh, h) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.mono (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L₁ :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.mono h hst
theorem has_deriv_within_at.mono (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.mono h hst
theorem has_deriv_at.has_deriv_at_filter (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L :=
has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_at_filter h hL
theorem has_deriv_at.has_deriv_within_at
(h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_within_at h
lemma has_deriv_within_at.differentiable_within_at (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.differentiable_within_at h
lemma has_deriv_at.differentiable_at (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at h
@[simp] lemma has_deriv_within_at_univ : has_deriv_within_at f f' univ x ↔ has_deriv_at f f' x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_univ
theorem has_deriv_at_unique
(h₀ : has_deriv_at f f₀' x) (h₁ : has_deriv_at f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
smul_right_one_eq_iff.mp $ has_fderiv_at_unique h₀ h₁
lemma has_deriv_within_at_inter' (h : t ∈ nhds_within x s) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_inter' h
lemma has_deriv_within_at_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_inter h
lemma has_deriv_within_at.union (hs : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (ht : has_deriv_within_at f f' t x) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' (s ∪ t) x :=
begin
simp only [has_deriv_within_at, nhds_within_union],
exact hs.join ht,
end
lemma has_deriv_within_at.nhds_within (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(ht : s ∈ nhds_within x t) : has_deriv_within_at f f' t x :=
(has_deriv_within_at_inter' ht).1 (h.mono (inter_subset_right _ _))
lemma has_deriv_within_at.has_deriv_at (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_deriv_at f f' x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.has_fderiv_at h hs
lemma differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
has_deriv_within_at f (deriv_within f s x) s x :=
show has_fderiv_within_at _ _ _ _, by { convert h.has_fderiv_within_at, simp [deriv_within] }
lemma differentiable_at.has_deriv_at (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) : has_deriv_at f (deriv f x) x :=
show has_fderiv_at _ _ _, by { convert h.has_fderiv_at, simp [deriv] }
lemma has_deriv_at.deriv (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : deriv f x = f' :=
has_deriv_at_unique h.differentiable_at.has_deriv_at h
lemma has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within f s x = f' :=
hxs.eq_deriv _ h.differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at h
lemma fderiv_within_deriv_within : (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = deriv_within f s x :=
rfl
lemma deriv_within_fderiv_within :
smul_right 1 (deriv_within f s x) = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
by simp [deriv_within]
lemma fderiv_deriv : (fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = deriv f x :=
rfl
lemma deriv_fderiv :
smul_right 1 (deriv f x) = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
by simp [deriv]
lemma differentiable_at.deriv_within (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) : deriv_within f s x = deriv f x :=
by { unfold deriv_within deriv, rw h.fderiv_within hxs }
lemma deriv_within_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f t x) :
deriv_within f s x = deriv_within f t x :=
((differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at h).mono st).deriv_within ht
@[simp] lemma deriv_within_univ : deriv_within f univ = deriv f :=
by { ext, unfold deriv_within deriv, rw fderiv_within_univ }
lemma deriv_within_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within f (s ∩ t) x = deriv_within f s x :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_inter ht hs }
section congr
/-! ### Congruence properties of derivatives -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_congr_of_mem_sets
(hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₀ : ∀ᶠ x in L, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : f₀' = f₁') :
has_deriv_at_filter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ has_deriv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_congr_of_mem_sets hx h₀ (by simp [h₁])
lemma has_deriv_at_filter.congr_of_mem_sets (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L)
(hL : ∀ᶠ x in L, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_deriv_at_filter f₁ f' x L :=
by rwa has_deriv_at_filter_congr_of_mem_sets hx hL rfl
lemma has_deriv_within_at.congr_mono (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (ht : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f' t x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono h ht hx h₁
lemma has_deriv_within_at.congr (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hs : ∀x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (subset.refl _)
lemma has_deriv_within_at.congr_of_mem_nhds_within (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(h₁ : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f' s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.congr_of_mem_sets h h₁ hx
lemma has_deriv_at.congr_of_mem_nhds (h : has_deriv_at f f' x)
(h₁ : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f₁ y = f y) : has_deriv_at f₁ f' x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.congr_of_mem_sets h h₁ (mem_of_nhds h₁ : _)
lemma deriv_within_congr_of_mem_nhds_within (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hL : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
deriv_within f₁ s x = deriv_within f s x :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_congr_of_mem_nhds_within hs hL hx }
lemma deriv_within_congr (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hL : ∀y∈s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
deriv_within f₁ s x = deriv_within f s x :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_congr hs hL hx }
lemma deriv_congr_of_mem_nhds (hL : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f₁ y = f y) : deriv f₁ x = deriv f x :=
by { unfold deriv, rwa fderiv_congr_of_mem_nhds }
end congr
section id
/-! ### Derivative of the identity -/
variables (s x L)
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_id : has_deriv_at_filter id 1 x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ by simp
theorem has_deriv_within_at_id : has_deriv_within_at id 1 s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_id _ _
theorem has_deriv_at_id : has_deriv_at id 1 x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_id _ _
lemma deriv_id : deriv id x = 1 :=
has_deriv_at.deriv (has_deriv_at_id x)
@[simp] lemma deriv_id' : deriv (@id 𝕜) = λ _, 1 :=
funext deriv_id
lemma deriv_within_id (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) : deriv_within id s x = 1 :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_id, simp, assumption }
end id
section const
/-! ### Derivative of constant functions -/
variables (c : F) (s x L)
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_const : has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, c) 0 x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ λ _, by simp [continuous_linear_map.zero_apply, sub_self]
theorem has_deriv_within_at_const : has_deriv_within_at (λ x, c) 0 s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_const _ _ _
theorem has_deriv_at_const : has_deriv_at (λ x, c) 0 x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_const _ _ _
lemma deriv_const : deriv (λ x, c) x = 0 :=
has_deriv_at.deriv (has_deriv_at_const x c)
@[simp] lemma deriv_const' : deriv (λ x:𝕜, c) = λ x, 0 :=
funext (λ x, deriv_const x c)
lemma deriv_within_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) : deriv_within (λ x, c) s x = 0 :=
by { rw (differentiable_at_const _).deriv_within hxs, apply deriv_const }
end const
section is_linear_map
/-! ### Derivative of linear maps -/
variables (s x L) [is_linear_map 𝕜 f]
lemma is_linear_map.has_deriv_at_filter : has_deriv_at_filter f (f 1) x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left begin
intro y,
simp only [sub_smul, continuous_linear_map.one_apply, continuous_linear_map.smul_right_apply],
rw ← is_linear_map.smul f x,
rw ← is_linear_map.smul f y,
simp
end
lemma is_linear_map.has_deriv_within_at : has_deriv_within_at f (f 1) s x :=
is_linear_map.has_deriv_at_filter _ _
lemma is_linear_map.has_deriv_at : has_deriv_at f (f 1) x :=
is_linear_map.has_deriv_at_filter _ _
lemma is_linear_map.differentiable_at : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
(is_linear_map.has_deriv_at _).differentiable_at
lemma is_linear_map.differentiable_within_at : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
(is_linear_map.differentiable_at _).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma is_linear_map.deriv : deriv f x = f 1 :=
has_deriv_at.deriv (is_linear_map.has_deriv_at _)
lemma is_linear_map.deriv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within f s x = f 1 :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.deriv_within (is_linear_map.differentiable_at _) hxs,
apply is_linear_map.deriv,
assumption
end
lemma is_linear_map.differentiable : differentiable 𝕜 f :=
λ x, is_linear_map.differentiable_at _
lemma is_linear_map.differentiable_on : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
is_linear_map.differentiable.differentiable_on
end is_linear_map
section add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.add
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_deriv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') x L :=
(hf.add hg).congr_left $ by simp [add_smul, smul_add]
theorem has_deriv_within_at.add
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
theorem has_deriv_at.add
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_deriv_at g g' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
lemma deriv_within_add (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
deriv_within (λy, f y + g y) s x = deriv_within f s x + deriv_within g s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.add hg.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_add
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
deriv (λy, f y + g y) x = deriv f x + deriv g x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.add hg.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.add_const
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ y, f y + c) f' x L :=
add_zero f' ▸ hf.add (has_deriv_at_filter_const x L c)
theorem has_deriv_within_at.add_const
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, f y + c) f' s x :=
hf.add_const c
theorem has_deriv_at.add_const
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x + c) f' x :=
hf.add_const c
lemma deriv_within_add_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
deriv_within (λy, f y + c) s x = deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.add_const c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_add_const (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
deriv (λy, f y + c) x = deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.add_const c).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.const_add (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ y, c + f y) f' x L :=
zero_add f' ▸ (has_deriv_at_filter_const x L c).add hf
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_add (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c + f y) f' s x :=
hf.const_add c
theorem has_deriv_at.const_add (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, c + f x) f' x :=
hf.const_add c
lemma deriv_within_const_add (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : F) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λy, c + f y) s x = deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.const_add c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_add (c : F) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λy, c + f y) x = deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.const_add c).deriv
end add
section mul_vector
/-! ### Derivative of the multiplication of a scalar function and a vector function -/
variables {c : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' : 𝕜}
theorem has_deriv_within_at.smul
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) s x :=
begin
show has_fderiv_within_at _ _ _ _,
convert has_fderiv_within_at.smul hc hf,
ext,
simp [smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, mul_comm]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.smul
(hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.smul hf
end
lemma deriv_within_smul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y • f y) s x = c x • deriv_within f s x + (deriv_within c s x) • f x :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.smul hf.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_smul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, c y • f y) x = c x • deriv f x + (deriv c x) • f x :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.smul hf.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.smul_const
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (f : F) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y • f) (c' • f) s x :=
begin
have := hc.smul (has_deriv_within_at_const x s f),
rwa [smul_zero, zero_add] at this
end
theorem has_deriv_at.smul_const
(hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (f : F) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y • f) (c' • f) x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.smul_const f
end
lemma deriv_within_smul_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (f : F) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y • f) s x = (deriv_within c s x) • f :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.smul_const f).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_smul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (f : F) :
deriv (λ y, c y • f) x = (deriv c x) • f :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.smul_const f).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_smul
(c : 𝕜) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c • f y) (c • f') s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_within_at_const x s c).smul hf,
rw [zero_smul, add_zero]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.const_smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c • f y) (c • f') x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hf.const_smul c
end
lemma deriv_within_const_smul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : 𝕜) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c • f y) s x = c • deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.const_smul c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, c • f y) x = c • deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.const_smul c).deriv
end mul_vector
section neg
/-! ### Derivative of the negative of a function -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.neg (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, -f x) (-f') x L :=
h.neg.congr (by simp) (by simp)
theorem has_deriv_within_at.neg (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
theorem has_deriv_at.neg (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : has_deriv_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
lemma deriv_within_neg (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λy, -f y) s x = - deriv_within f s x :=
h.has_deriv_within_at.neg.deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_neg : deriv (λy, -f y) x = - deriv f x :=
if h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x then h.has_deriv_at.neg.deriv else
have ¬differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, -f y) x, from λ h', by simpa only [neg_neg] using h'.neg,
by simp only [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at h,
deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at this, neg_zero]
@[simp] lemma deriv_neg' : deriv (λy, -f y) = (λ x, - deriv f x) :=
funext $ λ x, deriv_neg
end neg
section sub
/-! ### Derivative of the difference of two functions -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.sub
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_deriv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x L :=
hf.add hg.neg
theorem has_deriv_within_at.sub
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
theorem has_deriv_at.sub
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_deriv_at g g' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
lemma deriv_within_sub (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
deriv_within (λy, f y - g y) s x = deriv_within f s x - deriv_within g s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.sub hg.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_sub
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
deriv (λ y, f y - g y) x = deriv f x - deriv g x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.sub hg.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
is_O (λ x', f x' - f x) (λ x', x' - x) L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.is_O_sub h
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.sub_const
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, f x - c) f' x L :=
hf.add_const (-c)
theorem has_deriv_within_at.sub_const
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, f x - c) f' s x :=
hf.sub_const c
theorem has_deriv_at.sub_const
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x - c) f' x :=
hf.sub_const c
lemma deriv_within_sub_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
deriv_within (λy, f y - c) s x = deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.sub_const c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_sub_const (c : F) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, f y - c) x = deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.sub_const c).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.const_sub (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, c - f x) (-f') x L :=
hf.neg.const_add c
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_sub (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, c - f x) (-f') s x :=
hf.const_sub c
theorem has_deriv_at.const_sub (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, c - f x) (-f') x :=
hf.const_sub c
lemma deriv_within_const_sub (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : F) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λy, c - f y) s x = -deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.const_sub c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_sub (c : F) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, c - f y) x = -deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.const_sub c).deriv
end sub
section continuous
/-! ### Continuity of a function admitting a derivative -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds
(hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
tendsto f L (𝓝 (f x)) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds hL h
theorem has_deriv_within_at.continuous_within_at
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds inf_le_left h
theorem has_deriv_at.continuous_at (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : continuous_at f x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds (le_refl _) h
end continuous
section cartesian_product
/-! ### Derivative of the cartesian product of two functions -/
variables {G : Type w} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
variables {f₂ : 𝕜 → G} {f₂' : G}
lemma has_deriv_at_filter.prod
(hf₁ : has_deriv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L) (hf₂ : has_deriv_at_filter f₂ f₂' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁', f₂') x L :=
show has_fderiv_at_filter _ _ _ _,
by convert has_fderiv_at_filter.prod hf₁ hf₂
lemma has_deriv_within_at.prod
(hf₁ : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f₁' s x) (hf₂ : has_deriv_within_at f₂ f₂' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁', f₂') s x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
lemma has_deriv_at.prod (hf₁ : has_deriv_at f₁ f₁' x) (hf₂ : has_deriv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁', f₂') x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
end cartesian_product
section composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of a vector function and a scalar function
We use `scomp` in lemmas on composition of vector valued and scalar valued functions, and `comp`
in lemmas on composition of scalar valued functions, in analogy for `smul` and `mul` (and also
because the `comp` version with the shorter name will show up much more often in applications).
The formula for the derivative involves `smul` in `scomp` lemmas, which can be reduced to
usual multiplication in `comp` lemmas.
-/
variables {h h₁ h₂ : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {h' h₁' h₂' : 𝕜}
/- For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable (x)
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.scomp
(hg : has_deriv_at_filter g g' (h x) (L.map h))
(hh : has_deriv_at_filter h h' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (g ∘ h) (h' • g') x L :=
have (smul_right 1 g' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] _).comp
(smul_right 1 h' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] _) =
smul_right 1 (h' • g'), by { ext, simp [mul_smul] },
begin
unfold has_deriv_at_filter,
rw ← this,
exact has_fderiv_at_filter.comp x hg hh,
end
theorem has_deriv_within_at.scomp {t : set 𝕜}
(hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' t (h x))
(hh : has_deriv_within_at h h' s x) (hst : s ⊆ h ⁻¹' t) :
has_deriv_within_at (g ∘ h) (h' • g') s x :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at_filter.scomp _ (has_deriv_at_filter.mono hg _) hh,
calc map h (nhds_within x s)
≤ nhds_within (h x) (h '' s) : hh.continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image
... ≤ nhds_within (h x) t : nhds_within_mono _ (image_subset_iff.mpr hst)
end
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem has_deriv_at.scomp
(hg : has_deriv_at g g' (h x)) (hh : has_deriv_at h h' x) :
has_deriv_at (g ∘ h) (h' • g') x :=
(hg.mono hh.continuous_at).scomp x hh
theorem has_deriv_at.scomp_has_deriv_within_at
(hg : has_deriv_at g g' (h x)) (hh : has_deriv_within_at h h' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (g ∘ h) (h' • g') s x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at hg,
exact has_deriv_within_at.scomp x hg hh subset_preimage_univ
end
lemma deriv_within.scomp
(hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g t (h x)) (hh : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 h s x)
(hs : s ⊆ h ⁻¹' t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (g ∘ h) s x = deriv_within h s x • deriv_within g t (h x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within _ hxs,
exact has_deriv_within_at.scomp x (hg.has_deriv_within_at) (hh.has_deriv_within_at) hs
end
lemma deriv.scomp
(hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g (h x)) (hh : differentiable_at 𝕜 h x) :
deriv (g ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g (h x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at.deriv,
exact has_deriv_at.scomp x hg.has_deriv_at hh.has_deriv_at
end
/-! ### Derivative of the composition of two scalar functions -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.comp
(hh₁ : has_deriv_at_filter h₁ h₁' (h₂ x) (L.map h₂))
(hh₂ : has_deriv_at_filter h₂ h₂' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') x L :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact hh₁.scomp x hh₂ }
theorem has_deriv_within_at.comp {t : set 𝕜}
(hh₁ : has_deriv_within_at h₁ h₁' t (h₂ x))
(hh₂ : has_deriv_within_at h₂ h₂' s x) (hst : s ⊆ h₂ ⁻¹' t) :
has_deriv_within_at (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') s x :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact hh₁.scomp x hh₂ hst, }
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem has_deriv_at.comp
(hh₁ : has_deriv_at h₁ h₁' (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : has_deriv_at h₂ h₂' x) :
has_deriv_at (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') x :=
(hh₁.mono hh₂.continuous_at).comp x hh₂
theorem has_deriv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at
(hh₁ : has_deriv_at h₁ h₁' (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : has_deriv_within_at h₂ h₂' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') s x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at hh₁,
exact has_deriv_within_at.comp x hh₁ hh₂ subset_preimage_univ
end
lemma deriv_within.comp
(hh₁ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 h₁ t (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 h₂ s x)
(hs : s ⊆ h₂ ⁻¹' t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (h₁ ∘ h₂) s x = deriv_within h₁ t (h₂ x) * deriv_within h₂ s x :=
begin
apply has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within _ hxs,
exact has_deriv_within_at.comp x (hh₁.has_deriv_within_at) (hh₂.has_deriv_within_at) hs
end
lemma deriv.comp
(hh₁ : differentiable_at 𝕜 h₁ (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : differentiable_at 𝕜 h₂ x) :
deriv (h₁ ∘ h₂) x = deriv h₁ (h₂ x) * deriv h₂ x :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at.deriv,
exact has_deriv_at.comp x hh₁.has_deriv_at hh₂.has_deriv_at
end
end composition
section composition_vector
/-! ### Derivative of the composition of a function between vector spaces and of a function defined on `𝕜` -/
variables {l : F → E} {l' : F →L[𝕜] E}
variable (x)
/-- The composition `l ∘ f` where `l : F → E` and `f : 𝕜 → F`, has a derivative within a set
equal to the Fréchet derivative of `l` applied to the derivative of `f`. -/
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at {t : set F}
(hl : has_fderiv_within_at l l' t (f x)) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hst : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
has_deriv_within_at (l ∘ f) (l' (f')) s x :=
begin
rw has_deriv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at,
convert has_fderiv_within_at.comp x hl hf hst,
ext,
simp
end
/-- The composition `l ∘ f` where `l : F → E` and `f : 𝕜 → F`, has a derivative equal to the
Fréchet derivative of `l` applied to the derivative of `f`. -/
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp_has_deriv_at
(hl : has_fderiv_at l l' (f x)) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (l ∘ f) (l' (f')) x :=
begin
rw has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at,
convert has_fderiv_at.comp x hl hf,
ext,
simp
end
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at
(hl : has_fderiv_at l l' (f x)) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (l ∘ f) (l' (f')) s x :=
begin
rw ← has_fderiv_within_at_univ at hl,
exact has_fderiv_within_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at x hl hf subset_preimage_univ
end
lemma fderiv_within.comp_deriv_within {t : set F}
(hl : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 l t (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (l ∘ f) s x = (fderiv_within 𝕜 l t (f x) : F → E) (deriv_within f s x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within _ hxs,
exact (hl.has_fderiv_within_at).comp_has_deriv_within_at x (hf.has_deriv_within_at) hs
end
lemma fderiv.comp_deriv
(hl : differentiable_at 𝕜 l (f x)) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (l ∘ f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 l (f x) : F → E) (deriv f x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at.deriv _,
exact (hl.has_fderiv_at).comp_has_deriv_at x (hf.has_deriv_at)
end
end composition_vector
section mul
/-! ### Derivative of the multiplication of two scalar functions -/
variables {c d : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' d' : 𝕜}
theorem has_deriv_within_at.mul
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (hd : has_deriv_within_at d d' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') s x :=
begin
convert hc.smul hd using 1,
rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, add_comm]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.mul (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (hd : has_deriv_at d d' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.mul hd
end
lemma deriv_within_mul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y * d y) s x = deriv_within c s x * d x + c x * deriv_within d s x :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.mul hd.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_mul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) :
deriv (λ y, c y * d y) x = deriv c x * d x + c x * deriv d x :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.mul hd.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.mul_const (hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y * d) (c' * d) s x :=
begin
convert hc.mul (has_deriv_within_at_const x s d),
rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.mul_const (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y * d) (c' * d) x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.mul_const d
end
lemma deriv_within_mul_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝕜) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y * d) s x = deriv_within c s x * d :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.mul_const d).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_mul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝕜) :
deriv (λ y, c y * d) x = deriv c x * d :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.mul_const d).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hd : has_deriv_within_at d d' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c * d y) (c * d') s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_within_at_const x s c).mul hd,
rw [zero_mul, zero_add]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hd : has_deriv_at d d' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c * d y) (c * d') x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hd.const_mul c
end
lemma deriv_within_const_mul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : 𝕜) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c * d y) s x = c * deriv_within d s x :=
(hd.has_deriv_within_at.const_mul c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) :
deriv (λ y, c * d y) x = c * deriv d x :=
(hd.has_deriv_at.const_mul c).deriv
end mul
section inverse
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x⁻¹` -/
lemma has_deriv_at_inv_one :
has_deriv_at (λx, x⁻¹) (-1) (1 : 𝕜) :=
begin
rw has_deriv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero,
have : is_o (λ (h : 𝕜), h^2 * (1 + h)⁻¹) (λ (h : 𝕜), h * 1) (𝓝 0),
{ have : tendsto (λ (h : 𝕜), (1 + h)⁻¹) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 (1 + 0)⁻¹) :=
((tendsto_const_nhds).add tendsto_id).inv' (by norm_num),
exact is_o.mul_is_O (is_o_pow_id one_lt_two) (is_O_one_of_tendsto _ this) },
apply this.congr' _ _,
{ have : metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) 1 ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜),
from metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 zero_lt_one,
filter_upwards [this],
assume h hx,
have : 0 < ∥1 + h∥ := calc
0 < ∥(1:𝕜)∥ - ∥-h∥ : by rwa [norm_neg, sub_pos, ← dist_zero_right h, normed_field.norm_one]
... ≤ ∥1 - -h∥ : norm_sub_norm_le _ _
... = ∥1 + h∥ : by simp,
have : 1 + h ≠ 0 := norm_pos_iff.mp this,
simp,
rw ← eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ (inv_ne_zero this),
field_simp,
simp [right_distrib, sub_mul,
(show (1 + h)⁻¹ * (1 + h) = 1, by rw mul_comm; exact field.mul_inv_cancel this)],
ring },
{ exact univ_mem_sets' mul_one }
end
theorem has_deriv_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λy, y⁻¹) (-(x^2)⁻¹) x :=
begin
have A : has_deriv_at (λy, y⁻¹) (-1) (x⁻¹ * x : 𝕜),
by { simp only [inv_mul_cancel x_ne_zero, has_deriv_at_inv_one] },
have B : has_deriv_at (λy, x⁻¹ * y) (x⁻¹) x,
by simpa only [mul_one] using (has_deriv_at_id x).const_mul x⁻¹,
convert (A.comp x B : _).const_mul x⁻¹,
{ ext y,
rw [function.comp_apply, mul_inv', inv_inv', mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel x_ne_zero,
mul_one] },
{ field_simp [pow_two] }
end
theorem has_deriv_within_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, x⁻¹) (-(x^2)⁻¹) s x :=
(has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero).has_deriv_within_at
lemma differentiable_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) x :=
(has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) s x :=
(differentiable_at_inv x_ne_zero).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_on_inv : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx:𝕜, x⁻¹) {x | x ≠ 0} :=
λx hx, differentiable_within_at_inv hx
lemma deriv_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, x⁻¹) x = -(x^2)⁻¹ :=
(has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero).deriv
lemma deriv_within_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, x⁻¹) s x = -(x^2)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.deriv_within (differentiable_at_inv x_ne_zero) hxs,
exact deriv_inv x_ne_zero
end
lemma has_fderiv_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_at (λx, x⁻¹) (smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λx, x⁻¹) (smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) s x :=
(has_fderiv_at_inv x_ne_zero).has_fderiv_within_at
lemma fderiv_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) x = smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) :=
(has_fderiv_at_inv x_ne_zero).fderiv
lemma fderiv_within_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) s x = smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within (differentiable_at_inv x_ne_zero) hxs,
exact fderiv_inv x_ne_zero
end
end inverse
section division
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ c x / d x` -/
variables {c d : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' d' : 𝕜}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.div
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (hd : has_deriv_within_at d d' s x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / (d x)^2) s x :=
begin
have A : (d x)⁻¹ * (d x)⁻¹ * (c' * d x) = (d x)⁻¹ * c',
by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hx, one_mul],
convert hc.mul ((has_deriv_at_inv hx).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hd),
simp [div_eq_inv_mul', pow_two, mul_inv', mul_add, A, sub_eq_add_neg],
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.div (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (hd : has_deriv_at d d' x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / (d x)^2) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hc.div hd hx
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.div
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) s x :=
((hc.has_deriv_within_at).div (hd.has_deriv_within_at) hx).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.div
(hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) x :=
((hc.has_deriv_at).div (hd.has_deriv_at) hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.div
(hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (hd : differentiable_on 𝕜 d s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).div (hd x h) (hx x h)
lemma differentiable.div
(hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (hd : differentiable 𝕜 d) (hx : ∀ x, d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) :=
λx, (hc x).div (hd x) (hx x)
lemma deriv_within_div
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) (hx : d x ≠ 0)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, c x / d x) s x
= ((deriv_within c s x) * d x - c x * (deriv_within d s x)) / (d x)^2 :=
((hc.has_deriv_within_at).div (hd.has_deriv_within_at) hx).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_div
(hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, c x / d x) x = ((deriv c x) * d x - c x * (deriv d x)) / (d x)^2 :=
((hc.has_deriv_at).div (hd.has_deriv_at) hx).deriv
end division
end
namespace polynomial
/-! ### Derivative of a polynomial -/
variables {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜}
variable (p : polynomial 𝕜)
/-- The derivative (in the analysis sense) of a polynomial `p` is given by `p.derivative`. -/
protected lemma has_deriv_at (x : 𝕜) : has_deriv_at (λx, p.eval x) (p.derivative.eval x) x :=
begin
apply p.induction_on,
{ simp [has_deriv_at_const] },
{ assume p q hp hq,
convert hp.add hq;
simp },
{ assume n a h,
convert h.mul (has_deriv_at_id x),
{ ext y, simp [pow_add, mul_assoc] },
{ simp [pow_add], ring } }
end
protected theorem has_deriv_within_at (x : 𝕜) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, p.eval x) (p.derivative.eval x) s x :=
(p.has_deriv_at x).has_deriv_within_at
protected lemma differentiable_at : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) x :=
(p.has_deriv_at x).differentiable_at
protected lemma differentiable_within_at : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) s x :=
p.differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
protected lemma differentiable : differentiable 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) :=
λx, p.differentiable_at
protected lemma differentiable_on : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) s :=
p.differentiable.differentiable_on
@[simp] protected lemma deriv : deriv (λx, p.eval x) x = p.derivative.eval x :=
(p.has_deriv_at x).deriv
protected lemma deriv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, p.eval x) s x = p.derivative.eval x :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.deriv_within p.differentiable_at hxs,
exact p.deriv
end
protected lemma continuous : continuous (λx, p.eval x) :=
p.differentiable.continuous
protected lemma continuous_on : continuous_on (λx, p.eval x) s :=
p.continuous.continuous_on
protected lemma continuous_at : continuous_at (λx, p.eval x) x :=
p.continuous.continuous_at
protected lemma continuous_within_at : continuous_within_at (λx, p.eval x) s x :=
p.continuous_at.continuous_within_at
protected lemma has_fderiv_at (x : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_at (λx, p.eval x) (smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
by simpa [has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at] using p.has_deriv_at x
protected lemma has_fderiv_within_at (x : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λx, p.eval x) (smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) s x :=
(p.has_fderiv_at x).has_fderiv_within_at
@[simp] protected lemma fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) x = smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) :=
(p.has_fderiv_at x).fderiv
protected lemma fderiv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) s x = smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within p.differentiable_at hxs,
exact p.fderiv
end
end polynomial
section pow
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x^n` for `n : ℕ` -/
variables {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜}
variable {n : ℕ }
lemma has_deriv_at_pow (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕜) : has_deriv_at (λx, x^n) ((n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1)) x :=
begin
convert (polynomial.C 1 * (polynomial.X)^n).has_deriv_at x,
{ simp },
{ rw [polynomial.derivative_monomial], simp }
end
theorem has_deriv_within_at_pow (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕜) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, x^n) ((n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1)) s x :=
(has_deriv_at_pow n x).has_deriv_within_at
lemma differentiable_at_pow : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, x^n) x :=
(has_deriv_at_pow n x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_pow : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, x^n) s x :=
differentiable_at_pow.differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_pow : differentiable 𝕜 (λx:𝕜, x^n) :=
λx, differentiable_at_pow
lemma differentiable_on_pow : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, x^n) s :=
differentiable_pow.differentiable_on
lemma deriv_pow : deriv (λx, x^n) x = (n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1) :=
(has_deriv_at_pow n x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_pow' : deriv (λx, x^n) = λ x, (n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1) :=
funext $ λ x, deriv_pow
lemma deriv_within_pow (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, x^n) s x = (n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1) :=
(has_deriv_within_at_pow n x s).deriv_within hxs
lemma iter_deriv_pow' {k : ℕ} :
deriv^[k] (λx:𝕜, x^n) = λ x, ((finset.range k).prod (λ i, n - i):ℕ) * x^(n-k) :=
begin
induction k with k ihk,
{ simp only [one_mul, finset.prod_range_zero, nat.iterate_zero, nat.sub_zero, nat.cast_one] },
{ simp only [nat.iterate_succ', ihk, finset.prod_range_succ],
ext x,
rw [((has_deriv_at_pow (n - k) x).const_mul _).deriv, nat.cast_mul, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc,
nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.sub_sub] }
end
lemma iter_deriv_pow {k : ℕ} :
deriv^[k] (λx:𝕜, x^n) x = ((finset.range k).prod (λ i, n - i):ℕ) * x^(n-k) :=
congr_fun iter_deriv_pow' x
end pow
section fpow
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x^m` for `m : ℤ` -/
variables {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜}
variable {m : ℤ}
lemma has_deriv_at_fpow (m : ℤ) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λx, x^m) ((m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1)) x :=
begin
have : ∀ m : ℤ, 0 < m → has_deriv_at (λx, x^m) ((m:𝕜) * x^(m-1)) x,
{ assume m hm,
lift m to ℕ using (le_of_lt hm),
simp only [fpow_of_nat, int.cast_coe_nat],
convert has_deriv_at_pow _ _ using 2,
rw [← int.coe_nat_one, ← int.coe_nat_sub, fpow_coe_nat],
norm_cast at hm,
exact nat.succ_le_of_lt hm },
rcases lt_trichotomy m 0 with hm|hm|hm,
{ have := (has_deriv_at_inv _).scomp _ (this (-m) (neg_pos.2 hm));
[skip, exact fpow_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hx _],
simp only [(∘), fpow_neg, one_div_eq_inv, inv_inv', smul_eq_mul] at this,
convert this using 1,
rw [pow_two, mul_inv', inv_inv', int.cast_neg, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, neg_mul_neg,
← fpow_add hx, mul_assoc, ← fpow_add hx], congr, abel },
{ simp only [hm, fpow_zero, int.cast_zero, zero_mul, has_deriv_at_const] },
{ exact this m hm }
end
theorem has_deriv_within_at_fpow (m : ℤ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, x^m) ((m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1)) s x :=
(has_deriv_at_fpow m hx).has_deriv_within_at
lemma differentiable_at_fpow (hx : x ≠ 0) : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, x^m) x :=
(has_deriv_at_fpow m hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_fpow (hx : x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, x^m) s x :=
(differentiable_at_fpow hx).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_on_fpow (hs : (0:𝕜) ∉ s) : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, x^m) s :=
λ x hxs, differentiable_within_at_fpow (λ hx, hs $ hx ▸ hxs)
-- TODO : this is true at `x=0` as well
lemma deriv_fpow (hx : x ≠ 0) : deriv (λx, x^m) x = (m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1) :=
(has_deriv_at_fpow m hx).deriv
lemma deriv_within_fpow (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
deriv_within (λx, x^m) s x = (m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1) :=
(has_deriv_within_at_fpow m hx s).deriv_within hxs
lemma iter_deriv_fpow {k : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
deriv^[k] (λx:𝕜, x^m) x = ((finset.range k).prod (λ i, m - i):ℤ) * x^(m-k) :=
begin
induction k with k ihk generalizing x hx,
{ simp only [one_mul, finset.prod_range_zero, nat.iterate_zero, int.coe_nat_zero, sub_zero,
int.cast_one] },
{ rw [nat.iterate_succ', finset.prod_range_succ, int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, int.coe_nat_succ,
← sub_sub, ← ((has_deriv_at_fpow _ hx).const_mul _).deriv],
apply deriv_congr_of_mem_nhds,
apply eventually.mono _ @ihk,
exact mem_nhds_sets (is_open_neg $ is_closed_eq continuous_id continuous_const) hx }
end
end fpow
/-! ### Upper estimates on liminf and limsup -/
section real
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' : ℝ} {s : set ℝ} {x : ℝ} {r : ℝ}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_slope_le (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hr : f' < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x (s \ {x}), (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r :=
has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope.1 hf (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio hr)
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_slope_le' (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(hs : x ∉ s) (hr : f' < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x s, (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r :=
(has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope' hs).1 hf (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio hr)
lemma has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_slope_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' (Ioi x) x) (hr : f' < r) :
∃ᶠ z in nhds_within x (Ioi x), (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r :=
(hf.limsup_slope_le' (lt_irrefl x) hr).frequently (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot x)
end real
section real_space
open metric
variables {E : Type u} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] {f : ℝ → E} {f' : E} {s : set ℝ}
{x r : ℝ}
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `s` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`∥f z - f x∥ / ∥z - x∥` is less than `r` in some neighborhood of `x` within `s`.
In other words, the limit superior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x` along `s`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x s, ∥z - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f z - f x∥ < r :=
begin
have hr₀ : 0 < r, from lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg f') hr,
have A : ∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x (s \ {x}), ∥(z - x)⁻¹ • (f z - f x)∥ ∈ Iio r,
from (has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope.1 hf).norm (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio hr),
have B : ∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x {x}, ∥(z - x)⁻¹ • (f z - f x)∥ ∈ Iio r,
from mem_sets_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within
(singleton_subset_iff.2 $ by simp [hr₀]),
have C := mem_sup_sets.2 ⟨A, B⟩,
rw [← nhds_within_union, diff_union_self, nhds_within_union, mem_sup_sets] at C,
filter_upwards [C.1],
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, norm_smul, mem_Iio, normed_field.norm_inv],
exact λ _, id
end
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `s` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`(∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) / ∥z - x∥` is less than `r` in some neighborhood of `x` within `s`.
In other words, the limit superior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x` along `s`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`.
This lemma is a weaker version of `has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le`
where `∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥` is replaced by `∥f z - f x∥`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_slope_norm_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x s, ∥z - x∥⁻¹ * (∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) < r :=
begin
apply (hf.limsup_norm_slope_le hr).mono,
assume z hz,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_sub_norm_le _ _) _) hz,
exact inv_nonneg.2 (norm_nonneg _)
end
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `(x, +∞)` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`∥f z - f x∥ / ∥z - x∥` is frequently less than `r` as `z → x+0`.
In other words, the limit inferior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x+0`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`. See also `has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le`
for a stronger version using limit superior and any set `s`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_norm_slope_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' (Ioi x) x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∃ᶠ z in nhds_within x (Ioi x), ∥z - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f z - f x∥ < r :=
(hf.limsup_norm_slope_le hr).frequently (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot x)
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `(x, +∞)` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`(∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) / (z - x)` is frequently less than `r` as `z → x+0`.
In other words, the limit inferior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x+0`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`.
See also
* `has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le` for a stronger version using
limit superior and any set `s`;
* `has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_norm_slope_le` for a stronger version using
`∥f z - f x∥` instead of `∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_slope_norm_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' (Ioi x) x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∃ᶠ z in nhds_within x (Ioi x), (z - x)⁻¹ * (∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) < r :=
begin
have := (hf.limsup_slope_norm_le hr).frequently (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot x),
refine this.mp (eventually.mono self_mem_nhds_within _),
assume z hxz hz,
rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos (sub_pos_of_lt hxz)] at hz
end
end real_space
|
f8ab1d20cc8169bc55b0d9282b064b77fe14cc0a | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /tests/lean/run/proj.lean | a21d773b07c70e583f299dc6d36864c7fcc9a9a8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 353 | lean | import logic.eq
inductive sigma2 {A : Type} (B : A → Type) :=
mk : Π (a : A), B a → sigma2 B
#projections sigma2 :: proj1 proj2
check sigma2.proj1
check sigma2.proj2
variables {A : Type} {B : A → Type}
variables (a : A) (b : B a)
theorem tst1 : sigma2.proj1 (sigma2.mk a b) = a :=
rfl
theorem tst2 : sigma2.proj2 (sigma2.mk a b) = b :=
rfl
|
910562f60440084caefe027e49f6087c4fc15bbc | a721fe7446524f18ba361625fc01033d9c8b7a78 | /src/principia/myring/basic.lean | 7807263989a37bbc6fd3fe8cb631c11b1efd8bb3 | [] | no_license | Sterrs/leaning | 8fd80d1f0a6117a220bb2e57ece639b9a63deadc | 3901cc953694b33adda86cb88ca30ba99594db31 | refs/heads/master | 1,627,023,822,744 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 245,512,190 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,616,429,050,000 | 1,583,527,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,526 | lean | namespace hidden
-- Commutative Unitary Ring
class myring (α : Type) extends has_add α, has_zero α, has_neg α, has_mul α, has_one α :=
(decidable_eq : ∀ a b : α, decidable (a = b))
(add_assoc (a b c : α) : a + b + c = a + (b + c))
(add_zero (a : α) : a + 0 = a)
(add_neg (a : α) : a + -a = 0)
(mul_assoc (a b c : α) : a * b * c = a * (b * c))
(mul_comm (a b : α) : a * b = b * a)
(mul_one (a : α) : a * 1 = a)
(mul_add (a b c : α) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c)
namespace myring
variables {α : Type} [myring α] (a b c : α)
instance (a b : α) : decidable (a = b) := decidable_eq a b
theorem one_mul : 1 * a = a :=
begin
rw [mul_comm],
from mul_one _,
end
theorem add_mul : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_comm _ c, mul_comm _ c, mul_add]
theorem add_cancel_right : a + c = b + c → a = b :=
begin
assume h,
rw [←add_zero a, ←add_zero b, ←add_neg c, ←add_assoc, ←add_assoc, h],
end
theorem add_cancel_right_iff: a + c = b + c ↔ a = b :=
begin
split, {
from add_cancel_right _ _ _,
}, {
assume hbc,
rw hbc,
},
end
theorem zero_add : 0 + a = a :=
begin
apply add_cancel_right _ _ (-a),
rw [add_assoc, add_neg, add_zero],
end
theorem neg_zero : -(0 : α) = 0 :=
begin
rw [←zero_add (-(0 : α)), add_neg],
end
private lemma important_first_lemma : a + b = 0 → b + a = 0 :=
begin
assume h,
apply add_cancel_right _ _ b,
rw [add_assoc, h, zero_add, add_zero],
end
theorem neg_add : -a + a = 0 :=
begin
apply important_first_lemma,
rw add_neg,
end
theorem add_cancel_left : a + b = a + c → b = c :=
begin
assume h,
rw [←zero_add b, ←zero_add c, ←neg_add a, add_assoc, add_assoc, h],
end
theorem add_cancel_left_iff: a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
begin
split, {
from add_cancel_left _ _ _,
}, {
assume hbc, rw hbc,
},
end
theorem neg_neg : -(-a) = a :=
begin
apply add_cancel_right _ _ (-a),
rw [add_neg, neg_add],
end
theorem neg_unique : a + b = 0 ↔ a = -b :=
begin
split,
assume h,
rw [←add_zero a, ←add_neg b, ←add_assoc],
conv {
to_rhs,
rw ←zero_add (-b),
},
congr,
assumption,
assume h,
subst h,
from neg_add b,
end
private theorem neg_distr_swap : -(a + b) = -b + -a :=
begin
symmetry,
rw [←neg_unique, add_assoc, ←add_assoc (-a), neg_add, zero_add, neg_add],
end
theorem mul_zero : a * 0 = 0 :=
begin
apply add_cancel_left (a * 0),
rw [←mul_add a, zero_add, add_zero],
end
theorem zero_mul : 0 * a = 0 :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_zero]
theorem neg_eq_mul_neg_one : -a = -1 * a :=
begin
symmetry,
conv {
to_rhs,
rw ←mul_one a,
},
rw [←neg_unique, mul_comm, ←mul_add, neg_add, mul_zero],
end
theorem neg_mul : (-a) * b = -(a * b) :=
begin
rw [←neg_unique, mul_comm (-a), mul_comm a, ←mul_add, neg_add, mul_zero],
end
theorem mul_neg : a * (-b) = -(a * b) :=
begin
rw [mul_comm a (-b), mul_comm a b],
apply neg_mul,
end
theorem neg_mul_neg : (-a) * (-b) = a * b :=
by rw [mul_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg]
theorem neg_distr : -(a + b) = -a + -b :=
by rw [neg_eq_mul_neg_one a, neg_eq_mul_neg_one b, ←mul_add, ←neg_eq_mul_neg_one]
-- "Negate Equality"
theorem neg_eq : a = b ↔ -a = -b :=
begin
split; assume h,
congr, assumption,
rw [←neg_neg a, ←neg_neg b, h],
end
theorem add_comm : a + b = b + a :=
by rw [neg_eq, neg_distr, neg_distr_swap]
theorem add_cancel_left_to_zero : a + b = b → a = 0 :=
begin
assume h,
apply add_cancel_right _ _ b,
rwa zero_add,
end
theorem add_cancel_left_to_zero_iff: a + b = b ↔ a = 0 :=
begin
split, {
from add_cancel_left_to_zero _ _,
}, {
assume ha0,
rw ha0,
rw zero_add,
},
end
theorem add_cancel_right_to_zero : a + b = a → b = 0 :=
λ h, add_cancel_left_to_zero b a (by rwa add_comm at h)
theorem add_cancel_right_to_zero_iff: a + b = a ↔ b = 0 :=
begin
split, {
from add_cancel_right_to_zero _ _,
}, {
assume hb0,
rw hb0,
rw add_zero,
},
end
theorem add_left : a = b → c + a = c + b :=
begin
assume h,
congr,
assumption,
end
theorem add_right : a = b → a + c = b + c :=
begin
assume h,
congr,
assumption,
end
theorem one_eq_zero_impl_all_zero : (1 : α) = 0 → ∀ x : α, x = 0 :=
begin
assume h10,
intro x,
rw [←one_mul x, h10, zero_mul],
end
def sub : α → α → α := λ a b, a + (-b)
instance: has_sub α := ⟨sub⟩
theorem sub_def : a - b = a + -b := rfl
theorem sub_self : a - a = 0 :=
begin
change a + -a = 0,
apply add_neg,
end
theorem sub_zero : a - 0 = a :=
by rw [sub_def, neg_zero, add_zero]
theorem zero_sub : 0 - a = -a :=
by rw [sub_def, zero_add]
theorem mul_sub : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
begin
change a * (b + (-c)) = a * b + -(a * c),
rw [mul_add, ←mul_neg],
end
theorem neg_sub : -(a - b) = b - a :=
by rw [sub_def, sub_def, neg_distr, neg_neg, add_comm]
theorem sub_mul : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c:=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_sub, mul_comm a, mul_comm b]
-- This is handy imo
-- Imma have to firmly agree, bro
theorem sub_to_zero_iff_eq : a - b = 0 ↔ a = b :=
begin
split; assume h, {
symmetry,
rwa [neg_eq, ←neg_unique, add_comm],
}, {
change a + -b = 0,
rwa [neg_unique, neg_neg],
},
end
instance add_is_assoc: is_associative α (+) := ⟨add_assoc⟩
instance add_is_comm: is_commutative α (+) := ⟨add_comm⟩
instance mul_is_assoc: is_associative α (*) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
instance mul_is_comm: is_commutative α (*) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
end myring
end hidden
|
42b74fb2aabb75d5a1e238d8202862877470b7e3 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/category_theory/limits/shapes/types.lean | 52068c9106ad267339290a401cbec574892104a5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,173 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.limits.types
import category_theory.limits.shapes.products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.terminal
/-!
# Special shapes for limits in `Type`.
The general shape (co)limits defined in `category_theory.limits.types`
are intended for use through the limits API,
and the actual implementation should mostly be considered "sealed".
In this file, we provide definitions of the "standard" special shapes of limits in `Type`,
giving the expected definitional implementation:
* the terminal object is `punit`
* the binary product of `X` and `Y` is `X × Y`
* the product of a family `f : J → Type` is `Π j, f j`.
Because these are not intended for use with the `has_limit` API,
we instead construct terms of `limit_data`.
As an example, when setting up the monoidal category structure on `Type`
we use the `types_has_terminal` and `types_has_binary_products` instances.
-/
universes u
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory.limits.types
/-- A restatement of `types.lift_π_apply` that uses `pi.π` and `pi.lift`. -/
@[simp]
lemma pi_lift_π_apply {β : Type u} (f : β → Type u) {P : Type u} (s : Π b, P ⟶ f b) (b : β) (x : P) :
(pi.π f b : (∏ f) → f b) (@pi.lift β _ _ f _ P s x) = s b x :=
congr_fun (limit.lift_π (fan.mk P s) b) x
/-- A restatement of `types.map_π_apply` that uses `pi.π` and `pi.map`. -/
@[simp]
lemma pi_map_π_apply {β : Type u} {f g : β → Type u} (α : Π j, f j ⟶ g j) (b : β) (x) :
(pi.π g b : (∏ g) → g b) (pi.map α x) = α b ((pi.π f b : (∏ f) → f b) x) :=
limit.map_π_apply _ _ _
/-- The category of types has `punit` as a terminal object. -/
def terminal_limit_cone : limits.limit_cone (functor.empty (Type u)) :=
{ cone :=
{ X := punit,
π := by tidy, },
is_limit := by tidy, }
/-- The category of types has `pempty` as an initial object. -/
def initial_limit_cone : limits.colimit_cocone (functor.empty (Type u)) :=
{ cocone :=
{ X := pempty,
ι := by tidy, },
is_colimit := by tidy, }
open category_theory.limits.walking_pair
/-- The product type `X × Y` forms a cone for the binary product of `X` and `Y`. -/
-- We manually generate the other projection lemmas since the simp-normal form for the legs is
-- otherwise not created correctly.
@[simps X]
def binary_product_cone (X Y : Type u) : binary_fan X Y :=
binary_fan.mk prod.fst prod.snd
@[simp]
lemma binary_product_cone_fst (X Y : Type u) :
(binary_product_cone X Y).fst = prod.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma binary_product_cone_snd (X Y : Type u) :
(binary_product_cone X Y).snd = prod.snd :=
rfl
/-- The product type `X × Y` is a binary product for `X` and `Y`. -/
@[simps]
def binary_product_limit (X Y : Type u) : is_limit (binary_product_cone X Y) :=
{ lift := λ (s : binary_fan X Y) x, (s.fst x, s.snd x),
fac' := λ s j, walking_pair.cases_on j rfl rfl,
uniq' := λ s m w, funext $ λ x, prod.ext (congr_fun (w left) x) (congr_fun (w right) x) }
/--
The category of types has `X × Y`, the usual cartesian product,
as the binary product of `X` and `Y`.
-/
@[simps]
def binary_product_limit_cone (X Y : Type u) : limits.limit_cone (pair X Y) :=
⟨_, binary_product_limit X Y⟩
/-- The functor which sends `X, Y` to the product type `X × Y`. -/
-- We add the option `type_md` to tell `@[simps]` to not treat homomorphisms `X ⟶ Y` in `Type*` as
-- a function type
@[simps {type_md := reducible}]
def binary_product_functor : Type u ⥤ Type u ⥤ Type u :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ obj := λ Y, X × Y,
map := λ Y₁ Y₂ f, (binary_product_limit X Y₂).lift (binary_fan.mk prod.fst (prod.snd ≫ f)) },
map := λ X₁ X₂ f,
{ app := λ Y, (binary_product_limit X₂ Y).lift (binary_fan.mk (prod.fst ≫ f) prod.snd) } }
/--
The product functor given by the instance `has_binary_products (Type u)` is isomorphic to the
explicit binary product functor given by the product type.
-/
noncomputable def binary_product_iso_prod : binary_product_functor ≅ (prod.functor : Type u ⥤ _) :=
begin
apply nat_iso.of_components (λ X, _) _,
{ apply nat_iso.of_components (λ Y, _) _,
{ exact ((limit.is_limit _).cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (binary_product_limit X Y)).symm },
{ intros Y₁ Y₂ f,
ext1;
simp } },
{ intros X₁ X₂ g,
ext : 3;
simp }
end
/-- The sum type `X ⊕ Y` forms a cocone for the binary coproduct of `X` and `Y`. -/
@[simps]
def binary_coproduct_cocone (X Y : Type u) : cocone (pair X Y) :=
binary_cofan.mk sum.inl sum.inr
/-- The sum type `X ⊕ Y` is a binary coproduct for `X` and `Y`. -/
@[simps]
def binary_coproduct_colimit (X Y : Type u) : is_colimit (binary_coproduct_cocone X Y) :=
{ desc := λ (s : binary_cofan X Y), sum.elim s.inl s.inr,
fac' := λ s j, walking_pair.cases_on j rfl rfl,
uniq' := λ s m w, funext $ λ x, sum.cases_on x (congr_fun (w left)) (congr_fun (w right)) }
/--
The category of types has `X ⊕ Y`,
as the binary coproduct of `X` and `Y`.
-/
def binary_coproduct_colimit_cocone (X Y : Type u) : limits.colimit_cocone (pair X Y) :=
⟨_, binary_coproduct_colimit X Y⟩
/--
The category of types has `Π j, f j` as the product of a type family `f : J → Type`.
-/
def product_limit_cone {J : Type u} (F : J → Type u) : limits.limit_cone (discrete.functor F) :=
{ cone :=
{ X := Π j, F j,
π := { app := λ j f, f j }, },
is_limit :=
{ lift := λ s x j, s.π.app j x,
uniq' := λ s m w, funext $ λ x, funext $ λ j, (congr_fun (w j) x : _) } }
/--
The category of types has `Σ j, f j` as the coproduct of a type family `f : J → Type`.
-/
def coproduct_colimit_cocone {J : Type u} (F : J → Type u) :
limits.colimit_cocone (discrete.functor F) :=
{ cocone :=
{ X := Σ j, F j,
ι :=
{ app := λ j x, ⟨j, x⟩ }, },
is_colimit :=
{ desc := λ s x, s.ι.app x.1 x.2,
uniq' := λ s m w,
begin
ext ⟨j, x⟩,
have := congr_fun (w j) x,
exact this,
end }, }
section fork
variables {X Y Z : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : f ≫ g = f ≫ h)
/--
Show the given fork in `Type u` is an equalizer given that any element in the "difference kernel"
comes from `X`.
The converse of `unique_of_type_equalizer`.
-/
noncomputable def type_equalizer_of_unique (t : ∀ (y : Y), g y = h y → ∃! (x : X), f x = y) :
is_limit (fork.of_ι _ w) :=
fork.is_limit.mk' _ $ λ s,
begin
refine ⟨λ i, _, _, _⟩,
{ apply classical.some (t (s.ι i) _),
apply congr_fun s.condition i },
{ ext i,
apply (classical.some_spec (t (s.ι i) _)).1 },
{ intros m hm,
ext i,
apply (classical.some_spec (t (s.ι i) _)).2,
apply congr_fun hm i },
end
/-- The converse of `type_equalizer_of_unique`. -/
lemma unique_of_type_equalizer (t : is_limit (fork.of_ι _ w)) (y : Y) (hy : g y = h y) :
∃! (x : X), f x = y :=
begin
let y' : punit ⟶ Y := λ _, y,
have hy' : y' ≫ g = y' ≫ h := funext (λ _, hy),
refine ⟨(fork.is_limit.lift' t _ hy').1 ⟨⟩, congr_fun (fork.is_limit.lift' t y' _).2 ⟨⟩, _⟩,
intros x' hx',
suffices : (λ (_ : punit), x') = (fork.is_limit.lift' t y' hy').1,
rw ← this,
apply fork.is_limit.hom_ext t,
ext ⟨⟩,
apply hx'.trans (congr_fun (fork.is_limit.lift' t _ hy').2 ⟨⟩).symm,
end
lemma type_equalizer_iff_unique :
nonempty (is_limit (fork.of_ι _ w)) ↔ (∀ (y : Y), g y = h y → ∃! (x : X), f x = y) :=
⟨λ i, unique_of_type_equalizer _ _ (classical.choice i), λ k, ⟨type_equalizer_of_unique f w k⟩⟩
/-- Show that the subtype `{x : Y // g x = h x}` is an equalizer for the pair `(g,h)`. -/
def equalizer_limit : limits.limit_cone (parallel_pair g h) :=
{ cone := fork.of_ι (subtype.val : {x : Y // g x = h x} → Y) (funext subtype.prop),
is_limit := fork.is_limit.mk' _ $ λ s,
⟨λ i, ⟨s.ι i, by apply congr_fun s.condition i⟩,
rfl,
λ m hm, funext $ λ x, subtype.ext (congr_fun hm x)⟩ }
end fork
end category_theory.limits.types
|
a8941b385dda0e256b2eb9122df397f2e8cdc3a6 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/category_theory/limits/presheaf.lean | d91f2030933606d907530c0cb29514d0312b07df | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,018 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.adjunction.limits
import category_theory.adjunction.opposites
import category_theory.elements
import category_theory.limits.functor_category
import category_theory.limits.kan_extension
import category_theory.limits.preserves.limits
import category_theory.limits.shapes.terminal
import category_theory.limits.types
/-!
# Colimit of representables
This file constructs an adjunction `yoneda_adjunction` between `(Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)` and `ℰ` given a
functor `A : C ⥤ ℰ`, where the right adjoint sends `(E : ℰ)` to `c ↦ (A.obj c ⟶ E)` (provided `ℰ`
has colimits).
This adjunction is used to show that every presheaf is a colimit of representables.
Further, the left adjoint `colimit_adj.extend_along_yoneda : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) ⥤ ℰ` satisfies
`yoneda ⋙ L ≅ A`, that is, an extension of `A : C ⥤ ℰ` to `(Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) ⥤ ℰ` through
`yoneda : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u`. It is the left Kan extension of `A` along the yoneda embedding,
sometimes known as the Yoneda extension, as proved in `extend_along_yoneda_iso_Kan`.
`unique_extension_along_yoneda` shows `extend_along_yoneda` is unique amongst cocontinuous functors
with this property, establishing the presheaf category as the free cocompletion of a small category.
## Tags
colimit, representable, presheaf, free cocompletion
## References
* [S. MacLane, I. Moerdijk, *Sheaves in Geometry and Logic*][MM92]
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Yoneda+extension
-/
namespace category_theory
noncomputable theory
open category limits
universes u₁ u₂
variables {C : Type u₁} [small_category C]
variables {ℰ : Type u₂} [category.{u₁} ℰ]
variable (A : C ⥤ ℰ)
namespace colimit_adj
/--
The functor taking `(E : ℰ) (c : Cᵒᵖ)` to the homset `(A.obj C ⟶ E)`. It is shown in `L_adjunction`
that this functor has a left adjoint (provided `E` has colimits) given by taking colimits over
categories of elements.
In the case where `ℰ = Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u` and `A = yoneda`, this functor is isomorphic to the identity.
Defined as in [MM92], Chapter I, Section 5, Theorem 2.
-/
@[simps]
def restricted_yoneda : ℰ ⥤ (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) :=
yoneda ⋙ (whiskering_left _ _ (Type u₁)).obj (functor.op A)
/--
The functor `restricted_yoneda` is isomorphic to the identity functor when evaluated at the yoneda
embedding.
-/
def restricted_yoneda_yoneda : restricted_yoneda (yoneda : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ P, nat_iso.of_components (λ X, yoneda_sections_small X.unop _)
(λ X Y f, funext $ λ x,
begin
dsimp,
rw ← functor_to_types.naturality _ _ x f (𝟙 _),
dsimp,
simp,
end))
(λ _ _ _, rfl)
/--
(Implementation). The equivalence of homsets which helps construct the left adjoint to
`colimit_adj.restricted_yoneda`.
It is shown in `restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv_natural` that this is a natural bijection.
-/
def restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) (E : ℰ)
{c : cocone ((category_of_elements.π P).left_op ⋙ A)} (t : is_colimit c) :
(c.X ⟶ E) ≃ (P ⟶ (restricted_yoneda A).obj E) :=
((ulift_trivial _).symm ≪≫ t.hom_iso' E).to_equiv.trans
{ to_fun := λ k,
{ app := λ c p, k.1 (opposite.op ⟨_, p⟩),
naturality' := λ c c' f, funext $ λ p,
(k.2 (quiver.hom.op ⟨f, rfl⟩ :
(opposite.op ⟨c', P.map f p⟩ : P.elementsᵒᵖ) ⟶ opposite.op ⟨c, p⟩)).symm },
inv_fun := λ τ,
{ val := λ p, τ.app p.unop.1 p.unop.2,
property := λ p p' f,
begin
simp_rw [← f.unop.2],
apply (congr_fun (τ.naturality f.unop.1) p'.unop.2).symm,
end },
left_inv :=
begin
rintro ⟨k₁, k₂⟩,
ext,
dsimp,
congr' 1,
simp,
end,
right_inv :=
begin
rintro ⟨_, _⟩,
refl,
end }
/--
(Implementation). Show that the bijection in `restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv` is natural (on the right).
-/
lemma restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv_natural (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) (E₁ E₂ : ℰ) (g : E₁ ⟶ E₂)
{c : cocone _} (t : is_colimit c) (k : c.X ⟶ E₁) :
restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv A P E₂ t (k ≫ g) =
restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv A P E₁ t k ≫ (restricted_yoneda A).map g :=
begin
ext _ X p,
apply (assoc _ _ _).symm,
end
variables [has_colimits ℰ]
/--
The left adjoint to the functor `restricted_yoneda` (shown in `yoneda_adjunction`). It is also an
extension of `A` along the yoneda embedding (shown in `is_extension_along_yoneda`), in particular
it is the left Kan extension of `A` through the yoneda embedding.
-/
def extend_along_yoneda : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) ⥤ ℰ :=
adjunction.left_adjoint_of_equiv
(λ P E, restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv A P E (colimit.is_colimit _))
(λ P E E' g, restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv_natural A P E E' g _)
@[simp]
lemma extend_along_yoneda_obj (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) : (extend_along_yoneda A).obj P =
colimit ((category_of_elements.π P).left_op ⋙ A) := rfl
lemma extend_along_yoneda_map {X Y : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(extend_along_yoneda A).map f = colimit.pre ((category_of_elements.π Y).left_op ⋙ A)
(category_of_elements.map f).op :=
begin
ext J,
erw colimit.ι_pre ((category_of_elements.π Y).left_op ⋙ A) (category_of_elements.map f).op,
dsimp only [extend_along_yoneda, restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv,
is_colimit.hom_iso', is_colimit.hom_iso, ulift_trivial],
simpa
end
/--
Show `extend_along_yoneda` is left adjoint to `restricted_yoneda`.
The construction of [MM92], Chapter I, Section 5, Theorem 2.
-/
def yoneda_adjunction : extend_along_yoneda A ⊣ restricted_yoneda A :=
adjunction.adjunction_of_equiv_left _ _
/--
The initial object in the category of elements for a representable functor. In `is_initial` it is
shown that this is initial.
-/
def elements.initial (A : C) : (yoneda.obj A).elements :=
⟨opposite.op A, 𝟙 _⟩
/--
Show that `elements.initial A` is initial in the category of elements for the `yoneda` functor.
-/
def is_initial (A : C) : is_initial (elements.initial A) :=
{ desc := λ s, ⟨s.X.2.op, comp_id _⟩,
uniq' := λ s m w,
begin
simp_rw ← m.2,
dsimp [elements.initial],
simp,
end,
fac' := by rintros s ⟨⟨⟩⟩, }
/--
`extend_along_yoneda A` is an extension of `A` to the presheaf category along the yoneda embedding.
`unique_extension_along_yoneda` shows it is unique among functors preserving colimits with this
property (up to isomorphism).
The first part of [MM92], Chapter I, Section 5, Corollary 4.
See Property 1 of <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Yoneda+extension#properties>.
-/
def is_extension_along_yoneda : (yoneda : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) ⋙ extend_along_yoneda A ≅ A :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ X, (colimit.is_colimit _).cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso
(colimit_of_diagram_terminal (terminal_op_of_initial (is_initial _)) _))
begin
intros X Y f,
change (colimit.desc _ ⟨_, _⟩ ≫ colimit.desc _ _) = colimit.desc _ _ ≫ _,
apply colimit.hom_ext,
intro j,
rw [colimit.ι_desc_assoc, colimit.ι_desc_assoc],
change (colimit.ι _ _ ≫ 𝟙 _) ≫ colimit.desc _ _ = _,
rw [comp_id, colimit.ι_desc],
dsimp,
rw ← A.map_comp,
congr' 1,
end
/-- See Property 2 of https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Yoneda+extension#properties. -/
instance : preserves_colimits (extend_along_yoneda A) :=
(yoneda_adjunction A).left_adjoint_preserves_colimits
/--
Show that the images of `X` after `extend_along_yoneda` and `Lan yoneda` are indeed isomorphic.
This follows from `category_theory.category_of_elements.costructured_arrow_yoneda_equivalence`.
-/
@[simps] def extend_along_yoneda_iso_Kan_app (X) :
(extend_along_yoneda A).obj X ≅ ((Lan yoneda : (_ ⥤ ℰ) ⥤ _).obj A).obj X :=
let eq := category_of_elements.costructured_arrow_yoneda_equivalence X in
{ hom := colimit.pre (Lan.diagram (yoneda : C ⥤ _ ⥤ Type u₁) A X) eq.functor,
inv := colimit.pre ((category_of_elements.π X).left_op ⋙ A) eq.inverse,
hom_inv_id' :=
begin
erw colimit.pre_pre ((category_of_elements.π X).left_op ⋙ A) eq.inverse,
transitivity colimit.pre ((category_of_elements.π X).left_op ⋙ A) (𝟭 _),
congr,
{ exact congr_arg functor.op (category_of_elements.from_to_costructured_arrow_eq X) },
{ ext, simp only [colimit.ι_pre], erw category.comp_id, congr }
end,
inv_hom_id' :=
begin
erw colimit.pre_pre (Lan.diagram (yoneda : C ⥤ _ ⥤ Type u₁) A X) eq.functor,
transitivity colimit.pre (Lan.diagram (yoneda : C ⥤ _ ⥤ Type u₁) A X) (𝟭 _),
congr,
{ exact category_of_elements.to_from_costructured_arrow_eq X },
{ ext, simp only [colimit.ι_pre], erw category.comp_id, congr }
end }
/--
Verify that `extend_along_yoneda` is indeed the left Kan extension along the yoneda embedding.
-/
@[simps]
def extend_along_yoneda_iso_Kan : extend_along_yoneda A ≅ (Lan yoneda : (_ ⥤ ℰ) ⥤ _).obj A :=
nat_iso.of_components (extend_along_yoneda_iso_Kan_app A)
begin
intros X Y f, simp,
rw extend_along_yoneda_map,
erw colimit.pre_pre (Lan.diagram (yoneda : C ⥤ _ ⥤ Type u₁) A Y) (costructured_arrow.map f),
erw colimit.pre_pre (Lan.diagram (yoneda : C ⥤ _ ⥤ Type u₁) A Y)
(category_of_elements.costructured_arrow_yoneda_equivalence Y).functor,
congr' 1,
apply category_of_elements.costructured_arrow_yoneda_equivalence_naturality,
end
/-- extending `F ⋙ yoneda` along the yoneda embedding is isomorphic to `Lan F.op`. -/
@[simps] def extend_of_comp_yoneda_iso_Lan {D : Type u₁} [small_category D] (F : C ⥤ D) :
extend_along_yoneda (F ⋙ yoneda) ≅ Lan F.op :=
adjunction.nat_iso_of_right_adjoint_nat_iso
(yoneda_adjunction (F ⋙ yoneda))
(Lan.adjunction (Type u₁) F.op)
(iso_whisker_right curried_yoneda_lemma' ((whiskering_left Cᵒᵖ Dᵒᵖ (Type u₁)).obj F.op : _))
end colimit_adj
open colimit_adj
/-- `F ⋙ yoneda` is naturally isomorphic to `yoneda ⋙ Lan F.op`. -/
@[simps] def comp_yoneda_iso_yoneda_comp_Lan {D : Type u₁} [small_category D] (F : C ⥤ D) :
F ⋙ yoneda ≅ yoneda ⋙ Lan F.op :=
(is_extension_along_yoneda (F ⋙ yoneda)).symm ≪≫
iso_whisker_left yoneda (extend_of_comp_yoneda_iso_Lan F)
/--
Since `extend_along_yoneda A` is adjoint to `restricted_yoneda A`, if we use `A = yoneda`
then `restricted_yoneda A` is isomorphic to the identity, and so `extend_along_yoneda A` is as well.
-/
def extend_along_yoneda_yoneda : extend_along_yoneda (yoneda : C ⥤ _) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
adjunction.nat_iso_of_right_adjoint_nat_iso
(yoneda_adjunction _)
adjunction.id
restricted_yoneda_yoneda
/--
A functor to the presheaf category in which everything in the image is representable (witnessed
by the fact that it factors through the yoneda embedding).
`cocone_of_representable` gives a cocone for this functor which is a colimit and has point `P`.
-/
-- Maybe this should be reducible or an abbreviation?
def functor_to_representables (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) :
(P.elements)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁ :=
(category_of_elements.π P).left_op ⋙ yoneda
/--
This is a cocone with point `P` for the functor `functor_to_representables P`. It is shown in
`colimit_of_representable P` that this cocone is a colimit: that is, we have exhibited an arbitrary
presheaf `P` as a colimit of representables.
The construction of [MM92], Chapter I, Section 5, Corollary 3.
-/
def cocone_of_representable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) :
cocone (functor_to_representables P) :=
cocone.extend (colimit.cocone _) (extend_along_yoneda_yoneda.hom.app P)
@[simp] lemma cocone_of_representable_X (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) :
(cocone_of_representable P).X = P :=
rfl
/-- An explicit formula for the legs of the cocone `cocone_of_representable`. -/
-- Marking this as a simp lemma seems to make things more awkward.
lemma cocone_of_representable_ι_app (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) (j : (P.elements)ᵒᵖ):
(cocone_of_representable P).ι.app j = (yoneda_sections_small _ _).inv j.unop.2 :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
/-- The legs of the cocone `cocone_of_representable` are natural in the choice of presheaf. -/
lemma cocone_of_representable_naturality {P₁ P₂ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁} (α : P₁ ⟶ P₂)
(j : (P₁.elements)ᵒᵖ) :
(cocone_of_representable P₁).ι.app j ≫ α =
(cocone_of_representable P₂).ι.app ((category_of_elements.map α).op.obj j) :=
begin
ext T f,
simpa [cocone_of_representable_ι_app] using functor_to_types.naturality _ _ α f.op _,
end
/--
The cocone with point `P` given by `the_cocone` is a colimit: that is, we have exhibited an
arbitrary presheaf `P` as a colimit of representables.
The result of [MM92], Chapter I, Section 5, Corollary 3.
-/
def colimit_of_representable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) : is_colimit (cocone_of_representable P) :=
begin
apply is_colimit.of_point_iso (colimit.is_colimit (functor_to_representables P)),
change is_iso (colimit.desc _ (cocone.extend _ _)),
rw [colimit.desc_extend, colimit.desc_cocone],
apply_instance,
end
/--
Given two functors L₁ and L₂ which preserve colimits, if they agree when restricted to the
representable presheaves then they agree everywhere.
-/
def nat_iso_of_nat_iso_on_representables (L₁ L₂ : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) ⥤ ℰ)
[preserves_colimits L₁] [preserves_colimits L₂]
(h : yoneda ⋙ L₁ ≅ yoneda ⋙ L₂) : L₁ ≅ L₂ :=
begin
apply nat_iso.of_components _ _,
{ intro P,
refine (is_colimit_of_preserves L₁ (colimit_of_representable P)).cocone_points_iso_of_nat_iso
(is_colimit_of_preserves L₂ (colimit_of_representable P)) _,
apply functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫ _,
exact iso_whisker_left (category_of_elements.π P).left_op h },
{ intros P₁ P₂ f,
apply (is_colimit_of_preserves L₁ (colimit_of_representable P₁)).hom_ext,
intro j,
dsimp only [id.def, is_colimit.cocone_points_iso_of_nat_iso_hom, iso_whisker_left_hom],
have :
(L₁.map_cocone (cocone_of_representable P₁)).ι.app j ≫ L₁.map f =
(L₁.map_cocone (cocone_of_representable P₂)).ι.app ((category_of_elements.map f).op.obj j),
{ dsimp,
rw [← L₁.map_comp, cocone_of_representable_naturality],
refl },
rw [reassoc_of this, is_colimit.ι_map_assoc, is_colimit.ι_map],
dsimp,
rw [← L₂.map_comp, cocone_of_representable_naturality],
refl }
end
variable [has_colimits ℰ]
/--
Show that `extend_along_yoneda` is the unique colimit-preserving functor which extends `A` to
the presheaf category.
The second part of [MM92], Chapter I, Section 5, Corollary 4.
See Property 3 of https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Yoneda+extension#properties.
-/
def unique_extension_along_yoneda (L : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) ⥤ ℰ) (hL : yoneda ⋙ L ≅ A)
[preserves_colimits L] :
L ≅ extend_along_yoneda A :=
nat_iso_of_nat_iso_on_representables _ _ (hL ≪≫ (is_extension_along_yoneda _).symm)
/--
If `L` preserves colimits and `ℰ` has them, then it is a left adjoint. This is a special case of
`is_left_adjoint_of_preserves_colimits` used to prove that.
-/
def is_left_adjoint_of_preserves_colimits_aux (L : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) ⥤ ℰ) [preserves_colimits L] :
is_left_adjoint L :=
{ right := restricted_yoneda (yoneda ⋙ L),
adj := (yoneda_adjunction _).of_nat_iso_left
((unique_extension_along_yoneda _ L (iso.refl _)).symm) }
/--
If `L` preserves colimits and `ℰ` has them, then it is a left adjoint. Note this is a (partial)
converse to `left_adjoint_preserves_colimits`.
-/
def is_left_adjoint_of_preserves_colimits (L : (C ⥤ Type u₁) ⥤ ℰ) [preserves_colimits L] :
is_left_adjoint L :=
let e : (_ ⥤ Type u₁) ≌ (_ ⥤ Type u₁) := (op_op_equivalence C).congr_left,
t := is_left_adjoint_of_preserves_colimits_aux (e.functor ⋙ L : _)
in by exactI adjunction.left_adjoint_of_nat_iso (e.inv_fun_id_assoc _)
end category_theory
|
7db03ad94d94ac812e97620328db87ce6b47d0be | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/category_theory/concrete_category/bundled_hom.lean | 82130073462e72aa8888346977a60d7d117d248e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,581 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import category_theory.concrete_category.basic
import category_theory.concrete_category.bundled
/-!
# Category instances for algebraic structures that use bundled homs.
Many algebraic structures in Lean initially used unbundled homs (e.g. a bare function between types,
along with an `is_monoid_hom` typeclass), but the general trend is towards using bundled homs.
This file provides a basic infrastructure to define concrete categories using bundled homs, and
define forgetful functors between them.
-/
universes u
namespace category_theory
variables {c : Type u → Type u} (hom : Π ⦃α β : Type u⦄ (Iα : c α) (Iβ : c β), Type u)
/-- Class for bundled homs. Note that the arguments order follows that of lemmas for `monoid_hom`.
This way we can use `⟨@monoid_hom.to_fun, @monoid_hom.id ...⟩` in an instance. -/
structure bundled_hom :=
(to_fun : Π {α β : Type u} (Iα : c α) (Iβ : c β), hom Iα Iβ → α → β)
(id : Π {α : Type u} (I : c α), hom I I)
(comp : Π {α β γ : Type u} (Iα : c α) (Iβ : c β) (Iγ : c γ),
hom Iβ Iγ → hom Iα Iβ → hom Iα Iγ)
(hom_ext : ∀ {α β : Type u} (Iα : c α) (Iβ : c β), function.injective (to_fun Iα Iβ) . obviously)
(id_to_fun : ∀ {α : Type u} (I : c α), to_fun I I (id I) = _root_.id . obviously)
(comp_to_fun : ∀ {α β γ : Type u} (Iα : c α) (Iβ : c β) (Iγ : c γ)
(f : hom Iα Iβ) (g : hom Iβ Iγ),
to_fun Iα Iγ (comp Iα Iβ Iγ g f) = (to_fun Iβ Iγ g) ∘ (to_fun Iα Iβ f) . obviously)
attribute [class] bundled_hom
attribute [simp] bundled_hom.id_to_fun bundled_hom.comp_to_fun
namespace bundled_hom
variable [𝒞 : bundled_hom hom]
include 𝒞
/-- Every `@bundled_hom c _` defines a category with objects in `bundled c`.
This instance generates the type-class problem `bundled_hom ?m` (which is why this is marked as
`[nolint]`). Currently that is not a problem, as there are almost no instances of `bundled_hom`. -/
@[nolint dangerous_instance] instance category : category (bundled c) :=
by refine
{ hom := λ X Y, @hom X Y X.str Y.str,
id := λ X, @bundled_hom.id c hom 𝒞 X X.str,
comp := λ X Y Z f g, @bundled_hom.comp c hom 𝒞 X Y Z X.str Y.str Z.str g f,
comp_id' := _,
id_comp' := _,
assoc' := _};
intros; apply 𝒞.hom_ext;
simp only [𝒞.id_to_fun, 𝒞.comp_to_fun, function.left_id, function.right_id]
/-- A category given by `bundled_hom` is a concrete category.
This instance generates the type-class problem `bundled_hom ?m` (which is why this is marked as
`[nolint]`). Currently that is not a problem, as there are almost no instances of `bundled_hom`. -/
@[nolint dangerous_instance] instance : concrete_category (bundled c) :=
{ forget := { obj := λ X, X,
map := λ X Y f, 𝒞.to_fun X.str Y.str f,
map_id' := λ X, 𝒞.id_to_fun X.str,
map_comp' := by intros; erw 𝒞.comp_to_fun; refl },
forget_faithful := { map_injective' := by intros; apply 𝒞.hom_ext } }
variables {hom}
local attribute [instance] concrete_category.has_coe_to_fun
/-- A version of `has_forget₂.mk'` for categories defined using `@bundled_hom`. -/
def mk_has_forget₂ {d : Type u → Type u} {hom_d : Π ⦃α β : Type u⦄ (Iα : d α) (Iβ : d β), Type u}
[bundled_hom hom_d] (obj : Π ⦃α⦄, c α → d α)
(map : Π {X Y : bundled c}, (X ⟶ Y) → ((bundled.map obj X) ⟶ (bundled.map obj Y)))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y : bundled c} (f : X ⟶ Y), (map f : X → Y) = f)
: has_forget₂ (bundled c) (bundled d) :=
has_forget₂.mk'
(bundled.map @obj)
(λ _, rfl)
@map
(by intros; apply heq_of_eq; apply h_map)
variables {d : Type u → Type u}
variables (hom)
section
omit 𝒞
/--
The `hom` corresponding to first forgetting along `F`, then taking the `hom` associated to `c`.
For typical usage, see the construction of `CommMon` from `Mon`.
-/
@[reducible] def map_hom (F : Π {α}, d α → c α) : Π ⦃α β : Type u⦄ (Iα : d α) (Iβ : d β), Type u :=
λ α β iα iβ, hom (F iα) (F iβ)
end
/--
Construct the `bundled_hom` induced by a map between type classes.
This is useful for building categories such as `CommMon` from `Mon`.
-/
def map (F : Π {α}, d α → c α) : bundled_hom (map_hom hom @F) :=
{ to_fun := λ α β iα iβ f, 𝒞.to_fun (F iα) (F iβ) f,
id := λ α iα, 𝒞.id (F iα),
comp := λ α β γ iα iβ iγ f g, 𝒞.comp (F iα) (F iβ) (F iγ) f g,
hom_ext := λ α β iα iβ f g h, 𝒞.hom_ext (F iα) (F iβ) h }
section
omit 𝒞
/--
We use the empty `parent_projection` class to label functions like `comm_monoid.to_monoid`,
which we would like to use to automatically construct `bundled_hom` instances from.
Once we've set up `Mon` as the category of bundled monoids,
this allows us to set up `CommMon` by defining an instance
```instance : parent_projection (comm_monoid.to_monoid) := ⟨⟩```
-/
class parent_projection (F : Π {α}, d α → c α)
end
@[nolint unused_arguments] -- The `parent_projection` typeclass is just a marker, so won't be used.
instance bundled_hom_of_parent_projection (F : Π {α}, d α → c α) [parent_projection @F] :
bundled_hom (map_hom hom @F) :=
map hom @F
instance forget₂ (F : Π {α}, d α → c α) [parent_projection @F] : has_forget₂ (bundled d) (bundled c) :=
{ forget₂ :=
{ obj := λ X, ⟨X, F X.2⟩,
map := λ X Y f, f } }
end bundled_hom
end category_theory
|
df2f0e0368e335d2b11659e5bd90271b46949841 | f7315930643edc12e76c229a742d5446dad77097 | /tests/lean/run/tactic5.lean | 268cdc81e770a365154123225fba21fbcad89288 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bmalehorn/lean | 8f77b762a76c59afff7b7403f9eb5fc2c3ce70c1 | 53653c352643751c4b62ff63ec5e555f11dae8eb | refs/heads/master | 1,610,945,684,489 | 1,429,681,220,000 | 1,429,681,449,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 186 | lean | import logic
open tactic (renaming id->id_tac)
definition id {A : Type} (a : A) := a
theorem tst {A B : Prop} (H1 : A) (H2 : B) : id A
:= by !(unfold id; state); assumption
check tst
|
2ac3127eba97c1eb4096fea80e60665d86f8ccdf | e61a235b8468b03aee0120bf26ec615c045005d2 | /tests/lean/run/termElab.lean | 1901a93a5cfe68daa0928f8aeb74b8aff7a6ca1a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SCKelemen/lean4 | 140dc63a80539f7c61c8e43e1c174d8500ec3230 | e10507e6615ddbef73d67b0b6c7f1e4cecdd82bc | refs/heads/master | 1,660,973,595,917 | 1,590,278,033,000 | 1,590,278,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 687 | lean | import Init.Lean
open Lean
open Lean.Elab
open Lean.Elab.Term
set_option trace.Elab.debug true
def tst1 : TermElabM Unit := do
opt ← getOptions;
stx ← `(forall (a b : Nat), Nat);
dbgTrace "message 1"; -- This message goes direct to stdio. It will be displayed before trace messages.
e ← elabTermAndSynthesize stx none;
logDbgTrace (">>> " ++ e); -- display message when `trace.Elab.debug` is true
dbgTrace "message 2"
#eval tst1
def tst2 : TermElabM Unit := do
opt ← getOptions;
let a := mkTermId `a;
let b := mkTermId `b;
stx ← `((fun ($a : Type) (x : $a) => @id $a x) _ 1);
e ← elabTermAndSynthesize stx none;
logDbgTrace (">>> " ++ e);
throwErrorIfErrors
#eval tst2
|
d64a947bf55fba0a2dcf9c3edbe2eea6bc515d14 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/simp21.lean | 495221b86d3c162b85f383829a682244503d00a2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 257 | lean | variable vec : Nat → Type
rewrite_set simple
add_rewrite Nat::add_assoc Nat::add_zeror eq_id : simple
variable n : Nat
(*
local t = parse_lean([[ vec n = vec (n + 0) ]])
print(t)
print("===>")
local t2, pr = simplify(t, "simple")
print(t2)
print(pr)
*) |
f729fc80880973a7fc98395bbf6608b6be355e62 | 57aec6ee746bc7e3a3dd5e767e53bd95beb82f6d | /src/Lean/Meta/DiscrTree.lean | f000aff5544ad7d5287d3464db5130f4eebf8200 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | collares/lean4 | 861a9269c4592bce49b71059e232ff0bfe4594cc | 52a4f535d853a2c7c7eea5fee8a4fa04c682c1ee | refs/heads/master | 1,691,419,031,324 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 358,989,750 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,696,333,000 | 1,618,696,333,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,237 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Basic
import Lean.Meta.FunInfo
import Lean.Meta.InferType
namespace Lean.Meta.DiscrTree
/-
(Imperfect) discrimination trees.
We use a hybrid representation.
- A `PersistentHashMap` for the root node which usually contains many children.
- A sorted array of key/node pairs for inner nodes.
The edges are labeled by keys:
- Constant names (and arity). Universe levels are ignored.
- Free variables (and arity). Thus, an entry in the discrimination tree
may reference hypotheses from the local context.
- Literals
- Star/Wildcard. We use them to represent metavariables and terms
we want to ignore. We ignore implicit arguments and proofs.
- Other. We use to represent other kinds of terms (e.g., nested lambda, forall, sort, etc).
We reduce terms using `TransparencyMode.reducible`. Thus, all reducible
definitions in an expression `e` are unfolded before we insert it into the
discrimination tree.
Recall that projections from classes are **NOT** reducible.
For example, the expressions `Add.add α (ringAdd ?α ?s) ?x ?x`
and `Add.add Nat Nat.hasAdd a b` generates paths with the following keys
respctively
```
⟨Add.add, 4⟩, *, *, *, *
⟨Add.add, 4⟩, *, *, ⟨a,0⟩, ⟨b,0⟩
```
That is, we don't reduce `Add.add Nat inst a b` into `Nat.add a b`.
We say the `Add.add` applications are the de-facto canonical forms in
the metaprogramming framework.
Moreover, it is the metaprogrammer's responsibility to re-pack applications such as
`Nat.add a b` into `Add.add Nat inst a b`.
Remark: we store the arity in the keys
1- To be able to implement the "skip" operation when retrieving "candidate"
unifiers.
2- Distinguish partial applications `f a`, `f a b`, and `f a b c`.
-/
def Key.ctorIdx : Key → Nat
| Key.star => 0
| Key.other => 1
| Key.lit _ => 2
| Key.fvar _ _ => 3
| Key.const _ _ => 4
| Key.arrow => 5
def Key.lt : Key → Key → Bool
| Key.lit v₁, Key.lit v₂ => v₁ < v₂
| Key.fvar n₁ a₁, Key.fvar n₂ a₂ => Name.quickLt n₁ n₂ || (n₁ == n₂ && a₁ < a₂)
| Key.const n₁ a₁, Key.const n₂ a₂ => Name.quickLt n₁ n₂ || (n₁ == n₂ && a₁ < a₂)
| k₁, k₂ => k₁.ctorIdx < k₂.ctorIdx
instance : HasLess Key := ⟨fun a b => Key.lt a b⟩
instance (a b : Key) : Decidable (a < b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Key.lt a b))
def Key.format : Key → Format
| Key.star => "*"
| Key.other => "◾"
| Key.lit (Literal.natVal v) => fmt v
| Key.lit (Literal.strVal v) => repr v
| Key.const k _ => fmt k
| Key.fvar k _ => fmt k
| Key.arrow => "→"
instance : ToFormat Key := ⟨Key.format⟩
def Key.arity : Key → Nat
| Key.const _ a => a
| Key.fvar _ a => a
| Key.arrow => 2
| _ => 0
instance : Inhabited (Trie α) := ⟨Trie.node #[] #[]⟩
def empty : DiscrTree α := { root := {} }
partial def Trie.format [ToFormat α] : Trie α → Format
| Trie.node vs cs => Format.group $ Format.paren $
"node" ++ (if vs.isEmpty then Format.nil else " " ++ fmt vs)
++ Format.join (cs.toList.map $ fun ⟨k, c⟩ => Format.line ++ Format.paren (fmt k ++ " => " ++ format c))
instance [ToFormat α] : ToFormat (Trie α) := ⟨Trie.format⟩
partial def format [ToFormat α] (d : DiscrTree α) : Format :=
let (_, r) := d.root.foldl
(fun (p : Bool × Format) k c =>
(false, p.2 ++ (if p.1 then Format.nil else Format.line) ++ Format.paren (fmt k ++ " => " ++ fmt c)))
(true, Format.nil)
Format.group r
instance [ToFormat α] : ToFormat (DiscrTree α) := ⟨format⟩
/- The discrimination tree ignores implicit arguments and proofs.
We use the following auxiliary id as a "mark". -/
private def tmpMVarId : MVarId := `_discr_tree_tmp
private def tmpStar := mkMVar tmpMVarId
instance : Inhabited (DiscrTree α) where
default := {}
/--
Return true iff the argument should be treated as a "wildcard" by the discrimination tree.
- We ignore proofs because of proof irrelevance. It doesn't make sense to try to
index their structure.
- We ignore instance implicit arguments (e.g., `[Add α]`) because they are "morally" canonical.
Moreover, we may have many definitionally equal terms floating around.
Example: `Ring.hasAdd Int Int.isRing` and `Int.hasAdd`.
- We considered ignoring implicit arguments (e.g., `{α : Type}`) since users don't "see" them,
and may not even understand why some simplification rule is not firing.
However, in type class resolution, we have instance such as `Decidable (@Eq Nat x y)`,
where `Nat` is an implicit argument. Thus, we would add the path
```
Decidable -> Eq -> * -> * -> * -> [Nat.decEq]
```
to the discrimination tree IF we ignored the implict `Nat` argument.
This would be BAD since **ALL** decidable equality instances would be in the same path.
So, we index implicit arguments if they are types.
This setting seems sensible for simplification lemmas such as:
```
forall (x y : Unit), (@Eq Unit x y) = true
```
If we ignore the implicit argument `Unit`, the `DiscrTree` will say it is a candidate
simplification lemma for any equality in our goal.
Remark: if users have problems with the solution above, we may provide a `noIndexing` annotation,
and `ignoreArg` would return true for any term of the form `noIndexing t`.
-/
private def ignoreArg (a : Expr) (i : Nat) (infos : Array ParamInfo) : MetaM Bool := do
if h : i < infos.size then
let info := infos.get ⟨i, h⟩
if info.instImplicit then
return true
else if info.implicit then
return not (← isType a)
else
isProof a
else
isProof a
private partial def pushArgsAux (infos : Array ParamInfo) : Nat → Expr → Array Expr → MetaM (Array Expr)
| i, Expr.app f a _, todo => do
if (← ignoreArg a i infos) then
pushArgsAux infos (i-1) f (todo.push tmpStar)
else
pushArgsAux infos (i-1) f (todo.push a)
| _, _, todo => return todo
private partial def whnfEta (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
let e ← whnf e
match e.etaExpandedStrict? with
| some e => whnfEta e
| none => return e
/--
Return true if `e` is one of the following
- A nat literal (numeral)
- `Nat.zero`
- `Nat.succ x` where `isNumeral x`
- `OfNat.ofNat _ x _` where `isNumeral x` -/
private partial def isNumeral (e : Expr) : Bool :=
if e.isNatLit then true
else
let f := e.getAppFn
if !f.isConst then false
else
let fName := f.constName!
if fName == ``Nat.succ && e.getAppNumArgs == 1 then isNumeral e.appArg!
else if fName == ``OfNat.ofNat && e.getAppNumArgs == 3 then isNumeral (e.getArg! 1)
else if fName == ``Nat.zero && e.getAppNumArgs == 0 then true
else false
private def isNatType (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
return (← whnf e).isConstOf ``Nat
/--
Return true if `e` is one of the following
- `Nat.add _ k` where `isNumeral k`
- `Add.add Nat _ _ k` where `isNumeral k`
- `HAdd.hAdd _ Nat _ _ k` where `isNumeral k`
- `Nat.succ _`
This function assumes `e.isAppOf fName`
-/
private def isOffset (fName : Name) (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
if fName == ``Nat.add && e.getAppNumArgs == 2 then
return isNumeral e.appArg!
else if fName == ``Add.add && e.getAppNumArgs == 4 then
if (← isNatType (e.getArg! 0)) then return isNumeral e.appArg! else return false
else if fName == ``HAdd.hAdd && e.getAppNumArgs == 6 then
if (← isNatType (e.getArg! 1)) then return isNumeral e.appArg! else return false
else
return fName == ``Nat.succ && e.getAppNumArgs == 1
/-
TODO: add hook for users adding their own functions for controlling `shouldAddAsStar`
Different `DiscrTree` users may populate this set using, for example, attributes.
Remark: we currently tag `Nat.zero` and "offset" terms to avoid having to add special
support for `Expr.lit` and offset terms.
Example, suppose the discrimination tree contains the entry
`Nat.succ ?m |-> v`, and we are trying to retrieve the matches for `Expr.lit (Literal.natVal 1) _`.
In this scenario, we want to retrieve `Nat.succ ?m |-> v` -/
private def shouldAddAsStar (fName : Name) (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
if fName == `Nat.zero then
return true
else
isOffset fName e
def mkNoindexAnnotation (e : Expr) : Expr :=
mkAnnotation `noindex e
def hasNoindexAnnotation (e : Expr) : Bool :=
annotation? `noindex e |>.isSome
/- Remark: we use `shouldAddAsStar` only for nested terms, and `root == false` for nested terms -/
private def pushArgs (root : Bool) (todo : Array Expr) (e : Expr) : MetaM (Key × Array Expr) := do
if hasNoindexAnnotation e then
return (Key.star, todo)
else
let e ← whnfEta e
let fn := e.getAppFn
let push (k : Key) (nargs : Nat) : MetaM (Key × Array Expr) := do
let info ← getFunInfoNArgs fn nargs
let todo ← pushArgsAux info.paramInfo (nargs-1) e todo
return (k, todo)
match fn with
| Expr.lit v _ => return (Key.lit v, todo)
| Expr.const c _ _ =>
unless root do
if (← shouldAddAsStar c e) then
return (Key.star, todo)
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs
push (Key.const c nargs) nargs
| Expr.fvar fvarId _ =>
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs
push (Key.fvar fvarId nargs) nargs
| Expr.mvar mvarId _ =>
if mvarId == tmpMVarId then
-- We use `tmp to mark implicit arguments and proofs
return (Key.star, todo)
else if (← isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaqueExprMVar mvarId) then
return (Key.other, todo)
else
return (Key.star, todo)
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ =>
if b.hasLooseBVars then
return (Key.other, todo)
else
return (Key.arrow, todo.push d |>.push b)
| _ =>
return (Key.other, todo)
partial def mkPathAux (root : Bool) (todo : Array Expr) (keys : Array Key) : MetaM (Array Key) := do
if todo.isEmpty then
return keys
else
let e := todo.back
let todo := todo.pop
let (k, todo) ← pushArgs root todo e
mkPathAux false todo (keys.push k)
private def initCapacity := 8
def mkPath (e : Expr) : MetaM (Array Key) := do
withReducible do
let todo : Array Expr := Array.mkEmpty initCapacity
let keys : Array Key := Array.mkEmpty initCapacity
mkPathAux (root := true) (todo.push e) keys
private partial def createNodes (keys : Array Key) (v : α) (i : Nat) : Trie α :=
if h : i < keys.size then
let k := keys.get ⟨i, h⟩
let c := createNodes keys v (i+1)
Trie.node #[] #[(k, c)]
else
Trie.node #[v] #[]
private def insertVal [BEq α] (vs : Array α) (v : α) : Array α :=
if vs.contains v then vs else vs.push v
private partial def insertAux [BEq α] (keys : Array Key) (v : α) : Nat → Trie α → Trie α
| i, Trie.node vs cs =>
if h : i < keys.size then
let k := keys.get ⟨i, h⟩
let c := Id.run $ cs.binInsertM
(fun a b => a.1 < b.1)
(fun ⟨_, s⟩ => let c := insertAux keys v (i+1) s; (k, c)) -- merge with existing
(fun _ => let c := createNodes keys v (i+1); (k, c))
(k, arbitrary)
Trie.node vs c
else
Trie.node (insertVal vs v) cs
def insertCore [BEq α] (d : DiscrTree α) (keys : Array Key) (v : α) : DiscrTree α :=
if keys.isEmpty then panic! "invalid key sequence"
else
let k := keys[0]
match d.root.find? k with
| none =>
let c := createNodes keys v 1
{ root := d.root.insert k c }
| some c =>
let c := insertAux keys v 1 c
{ root := d.root.insert k c }
def insert [BEq α] (d : DiscrTree α) (e : Expr) (v : α) : MetaM (DiscrTree α) := do
let keys ← mkPath e
return d.insertCore keys v
private def getKeyArgs (e : Expr) (isMatch : Bool) : MetaM (Key × Array Expr) := do
let e ← whnfEta e
match e.getAppFn with
| Expr.lit v _ => return (Key.lit v, #[])
| Expr.const c _ _ =>
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs
return (Key.const c nargs, e.getAppRevArgs)
| Expr.fvar fvarId _ =>
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs
return (Key.fvar fvarId nargs, e.getAppRevArgs)
| Expr.mvar mvarId _ =>
if isMatch then
return (Key.other, #[])
else do
let ctx ← read
if ctx.config.isDefEqStuckEx then
/-
When the configuration flag `isDefEqStuckEx` is set to true,
we want `isDefEq` to throw an exception whenever it tries to assign
a read-only metavariable.
This feature is useful for type class resolution where
we may want to notify the caller that the TC problem may be solveable
later after it assigns `?m`.
The method `DiscrTree.getUnify e` returns candidates `c` that may "unify" with `e`.
That is, `isDefEq c e` may return true. Now, consider `DiscrTree.getUnify d (Add ?m)`
where `?m` is a read-only metavariable, and the discrimination tree contains the keys
`HadAdd Nat` and `Add Int`. If `isDefEqStuckEx` is set to true, we must treat `?m` as
a regular metavariable here, otherwise we return the empty set of candidates.
This is incorrect because it is equivalent to saying that there is no solution even if
the caller assigns `?m` and try again. -/
return (Key.star, #[])
else if (← isReadOnlyOrSyntheticOpaqueExprMVar mvarId) then
return (Key.other, #[])
else
return (Key.star, #[])
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ =>
if b.hasLooseBVars then
return (Key.other, #[])
else
return (Key.arrow, #[d, b])
| _ =>
return (Key.other, #[])
private abbrev getMatchKeyArgs (e : Expr) : MetaM (Key × Array Expr) :=
getKeyArgs e (isMatch := true)
private abbrev getUnifyKeyArgs (e : Expr) : MetaM (Key × Array Expr) :=
getKeyArgs e (isMatch := false)
private def getStarResult (d : DiscrTree α) : Array α :=
let result : Array α := Array.mkEmpty initCapacity
match d.root.find? Key.star with
| none => result
| some (Trie.node vs _) => result ++ vs
private abbrev findKey (cs : Array (Key × Trie α)) (k : Key) : Option (Key × Trie α) :=
cs.binSearch (k, arbitrary) (fun a b => a.1 < b.1)
partial def getMatch (d : DiscrTree α) (e : Expr) : MetaM (Array α) :=
withReducible do
let result := getStarResult d
let (k, args) ← getMatchKeyArgs e
match k with
| Key.star => return result
| _ =>
match d.root.find? k with
| none => return result
| some c => process args c result
where
process (todo : Array Expr) (c : Trie α) (result : Array α) : MetaM (Array α) := do
match c with
| Trie.node vs cs =>
if todo.isEmpty then
return result ++ vs
else if cs.isEmpty then
return result
else
let e := todo.back
let todo := todo.pop
let first := cs[0] /- Recall that `Key.star` is the minimal key -/
let (k, args) ← getMatchKeyArgs e
/- We must always visit `Key.star` edges since they are wildcards.
Thus, `todo` is not used linearly when there is `Key.star` edge
and there is an edge for `k` and `k != Key.star`. -/
let visitStar (result : Array α) : MetaM (Array α) :=
if first.1 == Key.star then
process todo first.2 result
else
return result
let visitNonStar (k : Key) (args : Array Expr) (result : Array α) : MetaM (Array α) :=
match findKey cs k with
| none => result
| some c => process (todo ++ args) c.2 result
let result ← visitStar result
match k with
| Key.star => result
/-
Recall that dependent arrows are `(Key.other, #[])`, and non-dependent arrows are `(Key.arrow, #[a, b])`.
A non-dependent arrow may be an instance of a dependent arrow (stored at `DiscrTree`). Thus, we also visit the `Key.other` child.
-/
| Key.arrow => visitNonStar Key.other #[] (← visitNonStar k args result)
| _ => visitNonStar k args result
partial def getUnify (d : DiscrTree α) (e : Expr) : MetaM (Array α) :=
withReducible do
let (k, args) ← getUnifyKeyArgs e
match k with
| Key.star => d.root.foldlM (init := #[]) fun result k c => process k.arity #[] c result
| _ =>
let result := getStarResult d
match d.root.find? k with
| none => return result
| some c => process 0 args c result
where
process (skip : Nat) (todo : Array Expr) (c : Trie α) (result : Array α) : MetaM (Array α) := do
match skip, c with
| skip+1, Trie.node vs cs =>
if cs.isEmpty then
return result
else
cs.foldlM (init := result) fun result ⟨k, c⟩ => process (skip + k.arity) todo c result
| 0, Trie.node vs cs => do
if todo.isEmpty then
return result ++ vs
else if cs.isEmpty then
return result
else
let e := todo.back
let todo := todo.pop
let (k, args) ← getUnifyKeyArgs e
let visitStar (result : Array α) : MetaM (Array α) :=
let first := cs[0]
if first.1 == Key.star then
process 0 todo first.2 result
else
return result
let visitNonStar (k : Key) (args : Array Expr) (result : Array α) : MetaM (Array α) :=
match findKey cs k with
| none => result
| some c => process 0 (todo ++ args) c.2 result
match k with
| Key.star => cs.foldlM (init := result) fun result ⟨k, c⟩ => process k.arity todo c result
-- See comment a `getMatch` regarding non-dependent arrows vs dependent arrows
| Key.arrow => visitNonStar Key.other #[] (← visitNonStar k args (← visitStar result))
| _ => visitNonStar k args (← visitStar result)
end Lean.Meta.DiscrTree
|
57e6194e87671df00dd5143bf5ddb6747b1c5b58 | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /src/Init/Control/Reader.lean | 8690305af56a2a24f556baeef9cf3dd6b5e6e37f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,071 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
The Reader monad transformer for passing immutable State.
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.MonadControl
import Init.Control.Id
import Init.Control.Alternative
import Init.Control.Except
universes u v w
/-- An implementation of [ReaderT](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/transformers-0.5.5.0/docs/Control-Monad-Trans-Reader.html#t:ReaderT) -/
def ReaderT (ρ : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) (α : Type u) : Type (max u v) :=
ρ → m α
instance ReaderT.inhabited (ρ : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) (α : Type u) [Inhabited (m α)] : Inhabited (ReaderT ρ m α) :=
⟨fun _ => arbitrary _⟩
@[inline] def ReaderT.run {ρ : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} {α : Type u} (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (r : ρ) : m α :=
x r
@[reducible] def Reader (ρ : Type u) := ReaderT ρ id
namespace ReaderT
section
variables {ρ : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} {α : Type u}
@[inline] protected def lift (a : m α) : ReaderT ρ m α :=
fun r => a
instance : MonadLift m (ReaderT ρ m) :=
⟨@ReaderT.lift ρ m⟩
instance (ε) [MonadExceptOf ε m] : MonadExceptOf ε (ReaderT ρ m) :=
{ throw := fun α => ReaderT.lift ∘ throwThe ε,
catch := fun α x c r => catchThe ε (x r) (fun e => (c e) r) }
@[inline] protected def orelse [Alternative m] {α : Type u} (x₁ x₂ : ReaderT ρ m α) : ReaderT ρ m α :=
fun s => x₁ s <|> x₂ s
@[inline] protected def failure [Alternative m] {α : Type u} : ReaderT ρ m α :=
fun s => failure
end
section
variables {ρ : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α β : Type u}
@[inline] protected def read : ReaderT ρ m ρ :=
pure
@[inline] protected def pure (a : α) : ReaderT ρ m α :=
fun r => pure a
@[inline] protected def bind (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (f : α → ReaderT ρ m β) : ReaderT ρ m β :=
fun r => do a ← x r; f a r
@[inline] protected def map (f : α → β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) : ReaderT ρ m β :=
fun r => f <$> x r
instance : Monad (ReaderT ρ m) :=
{ pure := @ReaderT.pure _ _ _, bind := @ReaderT.bind _ _ _, map := @ReaderT.map _ _ _ }
instance (ρ m m') [Monad m] [Monad m'] : MonadFunctor m m' (ReaderT ρ m) (ReaderT ρ m') :=
⟨fun _ f x r => f (x r)⟩
@[inline] protected def adapt {ρ' : Type u} [Monad m] {α : Type u} (f : ρ' → ρ) : ReaderT ρ m α → ReaderT ρ' m α :=
fun x r => x (f r)
instance [Alternative m] : Alternative (ReaderT ρ m) :=
{ ReaderT.Monad with
failure := @ReaderT.failure _ _ _,
orelse := @ReaderT.orelse _ _ _ }
end
end ReaderT
/-- An implementation of [MonadReader](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mtl-2.2.2/docs/Control-Monad-Reader-Class.html#t:MonadReader).
It does not contain `local` because this Function cannot be lifted using `monadLift`.
Instead, the `MonadReaderAdapter` class provides the more general `adaptReader` Function.
Note: This class can be seen as a simplification of the more "principled" definition
```
class MonadReader (ρ : outParam (Type u)) (n : Type u → Type u) :=
(lift {α : Type u} : (∀ {m : Type u → Type u} [Monad m], ReaderT ρ m α) → n α)
```
-/
class MonadReaderOf (ρ : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) :=
(read : m ρ)
@[inline] def readThe (ρ : Type u) {m : Type u → Type v} [MonadReaderOf ρ m] : m ρ :=
MonadReaderOf.read
/-- Similar to `MonadReaderOf`, but `ρ` is an outParam for convenience -/
class MonadReader (ρ : outParam (Type u)) (m : Type u → Type v) :=
(read : m ρ)
export MonadReader (read)
instance MonadReaderOf.isMonadReader (ρ : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) [MonadReaderOf ρ m] : MonadReader ρ m :=
⟨readThe ρ⟩
instance monadReaderTrans {ρ : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} {n : Type u → Type w}
[MonadReaderOf ρ m] [MonadLift m n] : MonadReaderOf ρ n :=
⟨monadLift (MonadReader.read : m ρ)⟩
instance {ρ : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] : MonadReaderOf ρ (ReaderT ρ m) :=
⟨ReaderT.read⟩
/-- Adapt a Monad stack, changing the Type of its top-most environment.
This class is comparable to [Control.Lens.Magnify](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/lens-4.15.4/docs/Control-Lens-Zoom.html#t:Magnify), but does not use lenses (why would it), and is derived automatically for any transformer implementing `MonadFunctor`.
Note: This class can be seen as a simplification of the more "principled" definition
```
class MonadReaderFunctor (ρ ρ' : outParam (Type u)) (n n' : Type u → Type u) :=
(map {α : Type u} : (∀ {m : Type u → Type u} [Monad m], ReaderT ρ m α → ReaderT ρ' m α) → n α → n' α)
```
-/
class MonadReaderAdapterOf (ρ : outParam (Type u)) (ρ' : Type u) (m m' : Type u → Type v) :=
(adaptReader {α : Type u} : (ρ' → ρ) → m α → m' α)
@[inline] def adaptTheReader {ρ : Type u} (ρ' : Type u) {m m' : Type u → Type v} [MonadReaderAdapterOf ρ ρ' m m'] {α} : (ρ' → ρ) → m α → m' α :=
MonadReaderAdapterOf.adaptReader
/-- Similar to `MonadReaderAdapterOf`, but `ρ'` is an `outParam` for convenience -/
class MonadReaderAdapter (ρ ρ' : outParam (Type u)) (m m' : Type u → Type v) :=
(adaptReader {α : Type u} : (ρ' → ρ) → m α → m' α)
export MonadReaderAdapter (adaptReader)
instance MonadReaderAdapterOf.isMonadReaderAdapter (ρ ρ' : Type u) (m m' : Type u → Type v) [MonadReaderAdapterOf ρ ρ' m m'] : MonadReaderAdapter ρ ρ' m m' :=
⟨fun α => adaptTheReader ρ'⟩
section
variables {ρ ρ' : Type u} {m m' : Type u → Type v}
instance monadReaderAdapterTrans {n n' : Type u → Type v} [MonadReaderAdapterOf ρ ρ' m m'] [MonadFunctor m m' n n'] : MonadReaderAdapterOf ρ ρ' n n' :=
⟨fun α f => monadMap (fun α => (adaptReader f : m α → m' α))⟩
instance [Monad m] : MonadReaderAdapterOf ρ ρ' (ReaderT ρ m) (ReaderT ρ' m) :=
⟨fun α => ReaderT.adapt⟩
end
instance (ρ : Type u) (m out) [MonadRun out m] : MonadRun (fun α => ρ → out α) (ReaderT ρ m) :=
⟨fun α x => run ∘ x⟩
class MonadReaderRunner (ρ : Type u) (m m' : Type u → Type u) :=
(runReader {α : Type u} : m α → ρ → m' α)
export MonadReaderRunner (runReader)
section
variables {ρ ρ' : Type u} {m m' : Type u → Type u}
instance monadReaderRunnerTrans {n n' : Type u → Type u} [MonadReaderRunner ρ m m'] [MonadFunctor m m' n n'] : MonadReaderRunner ρ n n' :=
⟨fun α x r => monadMap (fun (α) (y : m α) => (runReader y r : m' α)) x⟩
instance ReaderT.MonadStateRunner [Monad m] : MonadReaderRunner ρ (ReaderT ρ m) m :=
⟨fun α x r => x r⟩
end
instance ReaderT.monadControl (ρ : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) : MonadControl m (ReaderT ρ m) := {
stM := fun α => α,
liftWith := fun α f ctx => f fun β x => x ctx,
restoreM := fun α x ctx => x,
}
instance ReaderT.finally {m : Type u → Type v} {ρ : Type u} [MonadFinally m] [Monad m] : MonadFinally (ReaderT ρ m) :=
{ finally' := fun α β x h ctx => finally' (x ctx) (fun a? => h a? ctx) }
|
058ef31ce7d1b365de4dbc249d88eb80c97c148f | 302c785c90d40ad3d6be43d33bc6a558354cc2cf | /src/algebra/quadratic_discriminant.lean | 096cf464351051640dcc04190e1b9fe33e1c3408 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ilitzroth/mathlib | ea647e67f1fdfd19a0f7bdc5504e8acec6180011 | 5254ef14e3465f6504306132fe3ba9cec9ffff16 | refs/heads/master | 1,680,086,661,182 | 1,617,715,647,000 | 1,617,715,647,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,785 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import algebra.char_p.invertible
import order.filter.at_top_bot
import tactic.linarith
/-!
# Quadratic discriminants and roots of a quadratic
This file defines the discriminant of a quadratic and gives the solution to a quadratic equation.
## Main definition
- `discrim a b c`: the discriminant of a quadratic `a * x * x + b * x + c` is `b * b - 4 * a * c`.
## Main statements
- `quadratic_eq_zero_iff`: roots of a quadratic can be written as
`(-b + s) / (2 * a)` or `(-b - s) / (2 * a)`, where `s` is a square root of the discriminant.
- `quadratic_ne_zero_of_discrim_ne_square`: if the discriminant has no square root,
then the corresponding quadratic has no root.
- `discrim_le_zero`: if a quadratic is always non-negative, then its discriminant is non-positive.
## Tags
polynomial, quadratic, discriminant, root
-/
open filter
section ring
variables {R : Type*}
/-- Discriminant of a quadratic -/
def discrim [ring R] (a b c : R) : R := b^2 - 4 * a * c
variables [integral_domain R] {a b c : R}
/--
A quadratic has roots if and only if its discriminant equals some square.
-/
lemma quadratic_eq_zero_iff_discrim_eq_square (h2 : (2 : R) ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ 0) (x : R) :
a * x * x + b * x + c = 0 ↔ discrim a b c = (2 * a * x + b) ^ 2 :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
calc discrim a b c
= 4 * a * (a * x * x + b * x + c) + b * b - 4 * a * c : by { rw [h, discrim], ring }
... = (2*a*x + b)^2 : by ring },
{ assume h,
have ha : 2 * 2 * a ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero h2 h2) ha,
apply mul_left_cancel' ha,
calc
2 * 2 * a * (a * x * x + b * x + c) = (2 * a * x + b) ^ 2 - (b ^ 2 - 4 * a * c) : by ring
... = 0 : by { rw [← h, discrim], ring }
... = 2*2*a*0 : by ring }
end
/-- A quadratic has no root if its discriminant has no square root. -/
lemma quadratic_ne_zero_of_discrim_ne_square (h2 : (2 : R) ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ s : R, discrim a b c ≠ s * s) (x : R) :
a * x * x + b * x + c ≠ 0 :=
begin
assume h',
rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff_discrim_eq_square h2 ha, pow_two] at h',
exact h _ h'
end
end ring
section field
variables {K : Type*} [field K] [invertible (2 : K)] {a b c x : K}
/-- Roots of a quadratic -/
lemma quadratic_eq_zero_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) {s : K} (h : discrim a b c = s * s) (x : K) :
a * x * x + b * x + c = 0 ↔ x = (-b + s) / (2 * a) ∨ x = (-b - s) / (2 * a) :=
begin
have h2 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := nonzero_of_invertible 2,
rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff_discrim_eq_square h2 ha, h, pow_two, mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff],
have ne : 2 * a ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero h2 ha,
have : x = 2 * a * x / (2 * a) := (mul_div_cancel_left x ne).symm,
have h₁ : 2 * a * ((-b + s) / (2 * a)) = -b + s := mul_div_cancel' _ ne,
have h₂ : 2 * a * ((-b - s) / (2 * a)) = -b - s := mul_div_cancel' _ ne,
split,
{ intro h', rcases h',
{ left, rw h', simpa [add_comm] },
{ right, rw h', simpa [add_comm, sub_eq_add_neg] } },
{ intro h', rcases h', { left, rw [h', h₁], ring }, { right, rw [h', h₂], ring } }
end
/-- A quadratic has roots if its discriminant has square roots -/
lemma exists_quadratic_eq_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ∃ s, discrim a b c = s * s) :
∃ x, a * x * x + b * x + c = 0 :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨s, hs⟩,
use (-b + s) / (2 * a),
rw quadratic_eq_zero_iff ha hs,
simp
end
/-- Root of a quadratic when its discriminant equals zero -/
lemma quadratic_eq_zero_iff_of_discrim_eq_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : discrim a b c = 0) (x : K) :
a * x * x + b * x + c = 0 ↔ x = -b / (2 * a) :=
begin
have : discrim a b c = 0 * 0, by rw [h, mul_zero],
rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff ha this, add_zero, sub_zero, or_self]
end
end field
section linear_ordered_field
variables {K : Type*} [linear_ordered_field K] {a b c : K}
/-- If a polynomial of degree 2 is always nonnegative, then its discriminant is nonpositive -/
lemma discrim_le_zero (h : ∀ x : K, 0 ≤ a * x * x + b * x + c) : discrim a b c ≤ 0 :=
begin
rw [discrim, pow_two],
obtain ha|rfl|ha : a < 0 ∨ a = 0 ∨ 0 < a := lt_trichotomy a 0,
-- if a < 0
{ have : tendsto (λ x, (a * x + b) * x + c) at_top at_bot :=
tendsto_at_bot_add_const_right _ c ((tendsto_at_bot_add_const_right _ b
(tendsto_id.neg_const_mul_at_top ha)).at_bot_mul_at_top tendsto_id),
rcases (this.eventually (eventually_lt_at_bot 0)).exists with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact false.elim ((h x).not_lt $ by rwa ← add_mul) },
-- if a = 0
{ rcases em (b = 0) with (rfl|hb),
{ simp },
{ have := h ((-c - 1) / b), rw [mul_div_cancel' _ hb] at this, linarith } },
-- if a > 0
{ have := calc
4 * a * (a * (-(b / a) * (1 / 2)) * (-(b / a) * (1 / 2)) + b * (-(b / a) * (1 / 2)) + c)
= (a * (b / a)) * (a * (b / a)) - 2 * (a * (b / a)) * b + 4 * a * c : by ring
... = -(b * b - 4 * a * c) : by { simp only [mul_div_cancel' b (ne_of_gt ha)], ring },
have ha' : 0 ≤ 4 * a, by linarith,
have h := (mul_nonneg ha' (h (-(b / a) * (1 / 2)))),
rw this at h, rwa ← neg_nonneg }
end
/--
If a polynomial of degree 2 is always positive, then its discriminant is negative,
at least when the coefficient of the quadratic term is nonzero.
-/
lemma discrim_lt_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ∀ x : K, 0 < a * x * x + b * x + c) : discrim a b c < 0 :=
begin
have : ∀ x : K, 0 ≤ a*x*x + b*x + c := assume x, le_of_lt (h x),
refine lt_of_le_of_ne (discrim_le_zero this) _,
assume h',
have := h (-b / (2 * a)),
have : a * (-b / (2 * a)) * (-b / (2 * a)) + b * (-b / (2 * a)) + c = 0,
{ rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff_of_discrim_eq_zero ha h' (-b / (2 * a))] },
linarith
end
end linear_ordered_field
|
8a64843b272ff389d189b313bc465ccf2001d9fb | b147e1312077cdcfea8e6756207b3fa538982e12 | /data/list/basic.lean | 894b1ce7df5b7940a2bcfff5417592094ec38055 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SzJS/mathlib | 07836ee708ca27cd18347e1e11ce7dd5afb3e926 | 23a5591fca0d43ee5d49d89f6f0ee07a24a6ca29 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,980,332,064 | 1,532,063,841,000 | 1,532,063,841,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 153,451 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
Basic properties of lists.
-/
import
tactic.interactive tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop tactic.split_ifs
logic.basic logic.function logic.relation
algebra.group order.basic
data.nat.basic data.option data.bool data.prod data.sigma data.fin
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
@[simp] theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
theorem cons_inj {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
@[simp] theorem cons_inj' (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
⟨λ e, cons_inj e, congr_arg _⟩
/- mem -/
theorem eq_nil_of_forall_not_mem : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a, a ∉ l) → l = nil
| [] := assume h, rfl
| (b :: l') := assume h, absurd (mem_cons_self b l') (h b)
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, by intro h; simp [h]⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih; simp at h; cases h with h h,
{ subst h, exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, e⟩,
subst l, exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{simp at h, contradiction },
{simp, simp at h, cases h with h h,
{simp *},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{simp at h, contradiction},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{existsi c, simp [h]},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
existsi a, simp * }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_map_of_inj {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp [join, @mem_join L, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) : b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp [bind_map l]
/- list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_app_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_app_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp [subset_def, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem app_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp [mem_map]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
/- append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_foldl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s t : list β) : foldl f a (s ++ t) = foldl f (foldl f a s) t :=
by {induction s with b s H generalizing a, refl, simp [foldl], rw H _}
theorem append_foldr (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (s t : list α) : foldr f a (s ++ t) = foldr f (foldr f a t) s :=
by {induction s with b s H generalizing a, refl, simp [foldr], rw H _}
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c]
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { simp [nil_eq_append_iff, iff_def, or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt} },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp, exact eq_comm },
{ simp [ih, @eq_comm _ a, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left] } }
end
/-- Split a list at an index. `split 2 [a, b, c] = ([a, b], [c])` -/
def split_at : ℕ → list α → list α × list α
| 0 a := ([], a)
| (succ n) [] := ([], [])
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := let (l, r) := split_at n xs in (x :: l, r)
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp [take_append_drop n xs]
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj : ∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_left h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_right' h rfl
theorem append_left_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
⟨append_left_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem append_right_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨append_right_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply le_add_right
end
/- join -/
attribute [simp] join
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; simp *
/- repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n → b = a
| (n+1) h := or.elim h id $ @eq_of_mem_repeat _
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H :=
have b = a ∧ ∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → x = a,
by simpa [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] using H,
by dsimp; congr; [exact this.1, exact eq_repeat_of_mem this.2]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp [*, repeat, nat.succ_add, -add_comm]
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; simp [repeat, -add_comm, *]
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) : b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; simp *
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
/- bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_append {α β} (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
by simp [bind]
/- concat -/
/-- Concatenate an element at the end of a list. `concat [a, b] c = [a, b, c]` -/
@[simp] def concat : list α → α → list α
| [] a := [a]
| (b::l) a := b :: concat l a
@[simp] theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by induction l; intro h; contradiction
@[simp] theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with b l₁ ih; [simp, simp [ih]]
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp [*, concat]
@[simp] theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp [succ_eq_add_one]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by induction l₂ with b l₂ ih; simp
/- reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; simp *,
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; simp *
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; simp *
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
injective_of_left_inverse reverse_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; simp *
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp [reverse_core_eq]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; simp [*, or_comm]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp, λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ simp, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/- last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : ∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, simp *, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l; [refl, simp *]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp *
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
/- head and tail -/
@[simp] def head' : list α → option α
| [] := none
| (a :: l) := some a
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) : head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, simp}
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
by {induction l, contradiction, simp}
/- map -/
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h :=
have f a = g a, from h _ (mem_cons_self _ _),
have map f l = map g l, from map_congr $ assume a', h _ ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _,
show f a :: map f l = g a :: map g l, by simp [*]
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; simp *
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
theorem foldl_hom (f : α → β) (g : α → γ → α) (g' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (g a x) = g' (f a) x) (l : list γ) : f (foldl g a l) = foldl g' (f a) l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
theorem foldr_hom (f : α → β) (g : γ → α → α) (g' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (g x a) = g' x (f a)) (l : list γ) : f (foldr g a l) = foldr g' (f a) l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; simp *
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (begin rw [← length_map f l], simp [h] end)
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; simp *
theorem bind_ret_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by simp [list.bind]; induction l; simp [list.ret, join, *]
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
/- map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
/- sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ := sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_app_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_app_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h; simp * },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem reverse_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih; simp,
{ exact sublist_app_of_sublist_left ih },
{ exact append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right ih [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by have := reverse_sublist h; simp at this; assumption, reverse_sublist⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by have := reverse_sublist h; simp at this; assumption,
λ h, append_sublist_append_of_sublist_right h l⟩
theorem subset_of_sublist : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (subset_of_sublist s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (subset_of_sublist s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, subset_of_sublist h (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ subset_of_sublist s
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [apply sublist.refl, simp [*, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist_antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/- index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih; simp [-add_comm],
by_cases h : a = b; simp [h, -add_comm],
{ intro, contradiction },
{ rw ← ih, exact ⟨succ_inj, congr_arg _⟩ }
end
@[simp] theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih; simp [-add_comm, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b; simp [h, -add_comm, zero_le],
exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/- nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_ge_len : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, n ≥ length l → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_ge_len (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_ge_len hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
@[extensionality]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa; simp [*, ext (λn, h (n+1))]
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by rw [nth_ge_len h₁, nth_ge_len (by rwa [← hl])]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b; simp *
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i := by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, by simp); exact
λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
/-- Convert a list into an array (whose length is the length of `l`) -/
def to_array (l : list α) : array l.length α :=
{data := λ v, l.nth_le v.1 v.2}
/-- "inhabited" `nth` function: returns `default` instead of `none` in the case
that the index is out of bounds. -/
@[simp] def inth [h : inhabited α] (l : list α) (n : nat) : α := (nth l n).iget
/- nth tail operation -/
/-- Apply a function to the nth tail of `l`.
`modify_nth_tail f 2 [a, b, c] = [a, b] ++ f [c]`. Returns the input without
using `f` if the index is larger than the length of the list. -/
@[simp] def modify_nth_tail (f : list α → list α) : ℕ → list α → list α
| 0 l := f l
| (n+1) [] := []
| (n+1) (a::l) := a :: modify_nth_tail n l
/-- Apply `f` to the head of the list, if it exists. -/
@[simp] def modify_head (f : α → α) : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) := f a :: l
/-- Apply `f` to the nth element of the list, if it exists. -/
def modify_nth (f : α → α) : ℕ → list α → list α :=
modify_nth_tail (modify_head f)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m; simp [h, mt succ_inj]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp [update_nth_eq_modify_nth]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp [nth_modify_nth]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp [nth_modify_nth, h]; cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp [update_nth_eq_modify_nth]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, h]
/- take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero : ∀ (l : list α), take 0 l = [] :=
begin intros, reflexivity end
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
theorem take_all : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_all end
theorem take_all_of_ge : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, n ≥ length l → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_ge (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_take]
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
def take' : ∀ n, list α → list α
| 0 l := []
| (n+1) l := l.head :: take' n l.tail
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp [le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/- take_while -/
/-- Get the longest initial segment of the list whose members all satisfy `p`.
`take_while (λ x, x < 3) [0, 2, 5, 1] = [0, 2]` -/
def take_while (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) := if p a then a :: take_while l else []
/- foldl, foldr, scanl, scanr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
by induction l generalizing a; simp * {contextual := tt}
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
by induction l; simp * {contextual := tt}
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp [foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp [foldr_append]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp [foldl_join]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp [foldr_join]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; simp [*, foldr]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) : foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp [foldr_eta l]
/-- Fold a function `f` over the list from the left, returning the list
of partial results. `scanl (+) 0 [1, 2, 3] = [0, 1, 3, 6]` -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) : α → list β → list α
| a [] := [a]
| a (b::l) := a :: scanl (f a b) l
def scanr_aux (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : list α → β × list β
| [] := (b, [])
| (a::l) := let (b', l') := scanr_aux l in (f a b', b' :: l')
/-- Fold a function `f` over the list from the right, returning the list
of partial results. `scanr (+) 0 [1, 2, 3] = [6, 5, 3, 0]` -/
def scanr (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (l : list α) : list β :=
let (b', l') := scanr_aux f b l in b' :: l'
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp [scanr, scanr_aux] at t; simp [scanr, scanr_aux, t]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp [scanr]
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by simp [foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp;
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; simp
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp [foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := by simp
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp [ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc]; simp
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := by simp
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp [foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/- sum -/
/-- Product of a list. `prod [a, b, c] = ((1 * a) * b) * c` -/
@[to_additive list.sum]
def prod [has_mul α] [has_one α] : list α → α := foldl (*) 1
attribute [to_additive list.sum.equations._eqn_1] list.prod.equations._eqn_1
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_nil]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_cons]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp [list.prod]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_append]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive list.sum_join]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; simp [list.join, *] at *
end monoid
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; simp [*, nat.mul_succ]
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; simp *
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) : length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
/- lexicographic ordering -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {} {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
instance [decidable_linear_order α] : decidable_linear_order (list α) :=
decidable_linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
/- all & any, bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_cons' {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ (x : α), x = a ∨ x ∈ l → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x :=
by simp
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (by simp) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (by simp [xl]) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, simp [px] end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
@[simp] theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by induction l with a l; simp [forall_and_distrib, *]
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [all_iff_forall]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) : any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by induction l with a l; simp [or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, *]
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/- map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; simp *; apply ih
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp [pmap_eq_map_attach]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; simp *
/- find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
/-- `find p l` is the first element of `l` satisfying `p`, or `none` if no such
element exists. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → option α
| [] := none
| (a::l) := if p a then some a else find l
def find_indexes_aux (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → nat → list nat
| [] n := []
| (a::l) n := let t := find_indexes_aux l (succ n) in if p a then n :: t else t
/-- `find_indexes p l` is the list of indexes of elements of `l` that satisfy `p`. -/
def find_indexes (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) : list nat :=
find_indexes_aux p l 0
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
by_cases p a; simp [h, IH]
end
@[simp] theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases p b; simp [h] at H,
{ subst b, assumption },
{ exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases p b; simp [h] at H,
{ subst b, apply mem_cons_self },
{ exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-- `indexes_of a l` is the list of all indexes of `a` in `l`.
`indexes_of a [a, b, a, a] = [0, 2, 3]` -/
def indexes_of [decidable_eq α] (a : α) : list α → list nat := find_indexes (eq a)
/- filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp [filter_map, h]
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
simp [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH]
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
by_cases pa : p a; simp [filter_map, option.guard, pa, IH]
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp [h, option.bind] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp [h, h', option.bind]
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases p x; simp [h, option.guard, option.bind]
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {simp},
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp [map_filter_map, H]
theorem filter_map_sublist_filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem map_sublist_map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_map; exact filter_map_sublist_filter_map _ s
/- filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by simp at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp [pa, h.1.1 pa, filter_congr h.2],
simp [pa, mt h.1.2 pa, filter_congr h.2]]
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist $ filter_sublist l
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| [] ain := absurd ain (not_mem_nil a)
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, begin simp [pb] at ain, assumption end,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp [pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| [] ain pa := absurd ain (not_mem_nil a)
| (b::l) ain pa :=
if pb : p b then
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain)
(assume : a = b, by simp [pb, this])
(assume : a ∈ l, begin simp [pb], exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_filter_of_mem this pa)) end)
else
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain)
(assume : a = b, begin simp [this] at pa, contradiction end) --absurd (this ▸ pa) pb)
(assume : a ∈ l, by simp [pa, pb, mem_filter_of_mem this])
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l, {simp},
by_cases p a; simp [filter, *],
show filter p l ≠ a :: l, intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _)
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp [-and.comm, eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter]
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_filter; exact filter_map_sublist_filter_map _ s
theorem filter_of_map (f : β → α) (l) : filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : ∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [span, take_while, drop_while, pa, span_eq_take_drop l]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : ∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [take_while, drop_while, pa, take_while_append_drop l]
/-- `countp p l` is the number of elements of `l` that satisfy `p`. -/
def countp (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → nat
| [] := 0
| (x::xs) := if p x then succ (countp xs) else countp xs
@[simp] theorem countp_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l; [refl, by_cases (p x)]; simp [*, -add_comm]
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter s)
end filter
/- count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `count a l` is the number of occurrences of `a` in `l`. -/
def count (a : α) : list α → nat := countp (eq a)
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append
@[simp] theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, count_append, count_singleton]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp [count, countp_pos]
@[simp] theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
end count
/- prefix, suffix, infix -/
/-- `is_prefix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <+: l₂`, means that `l₁` is a prefix of `l₂`,
that is, `l₂` has the form `l₁ ++ t` for some `t`. -/
def is_prefix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ t, l₁ ++ t = l₂
/-- `is_suffix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <:+ l₂`, means that `l₁` is a suffix of `l₂`,
that is, `l₂` has the form `t ++ l₁` for some `t`. -/
def is_suffix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ t, t ++ l₁ = l₂
/-- `is_infix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <:+: l₂`, means that `l₁` is a contiguous
substring of `l₂`, that is, `l₂` has the form `s ++ l₁ ++ t` for some `s, t`. -/
def is_infix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ s t, s ++ l₁ ++ t = l₂
infix ` <+: `:50 := is_prefix
infix ` <:+ `:50 := is_suffix
infix ` <:+: `:50 := is_infix
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
@[simp] theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp [h]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, by simp⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, by simp⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_left_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_left_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_left_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨r, e⟩ := h in begin
rwa append_inj_left ((take_append_drop (length l₁) l₂).trans e.symm) _,
simp [min_eq_left, length_le_of_sublist (sublist_of_prefix h)],
end, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, begin
rwa append_inj_right ((take_append_drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂).trans e.symm) _,
simp [min_eq_left, nat.sub_le, e.symm],
apply nat.add_sub_cancel_left
end, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
/-- `inits l` is the list of initial segments of `l`.
`inits [1, 2, 3] = [[], [1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3]]` -/
@[simp] def inits : list α → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (a::l) := [] :: map (λt, a::t) (inits l)
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa,
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
/-- `tails l` is the list of terminal segments of `l`.
`tails [1, 2, 3] = [[1, 2, 3], [2, 3], [3], []]` -/
@[simp] def tails : list α → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (a::l) := (a::l) :: tails l
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp; exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp [mem_tails s t]; exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/- sublists -/
def sublists'_aux : list α → (list α → list β) → list (list β) → list (list β)
| [] f r := f [] :: r
| (a::l) f r := sublists'_aux l f (sublists'_aux l (f ∘ cons a) r)
/-- `sublists' l` is the list of all (non-contiguous) sublists of `l`.
It differs from `sublists` only in the order of appearance of the sublists;
`sublists'` uses the first element of the list as the MSB,
`sublists` uses the first element of the list as the LSB.
`sublists' [1, 2, 3] = [[], [3], [2], [2, 3], [1], [1, 3], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3]]` -/
def sublists' (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists'_aux l id []
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; simp! *
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; simp! *
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists']
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s; simp,
{ exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ (IH.1 h) },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ (IH.1 h) },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl (IH.2 h) },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, IH.2 h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, *]; rw [← two_mul, mul_comm]; refl
def sublists_aux : list α → (list α → list β → list β) → list β
| [] f := []
| (a::l) f := f [a] (sublists_aux l (λys r, f ys (f (a :: ys) r)))
/-- `sublists l` is the list of all (non-contiguous) sublists of `l`.
`sublists [1, 2, 3] = [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [3], [1, 3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3]]` -/
def sublists (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
[] :: sublists_aux l cons
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
def sublists_aux₁ : list α → (list α → list β) → list β
| [] f := []
| (a::l) f := f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λys, f ys ++ f (a :: ys))
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp *
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp [sublists_aux], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih; simp *
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp [sublists_aux₁]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp [sublists_aux₁];
rw [sublists_aux₁_append]; simp
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := by simp [sublists_aux₁]
| (a::l) f g := by simp [sublists_aux₁];
rw [sublists_aux₁_bind]; simp
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁],
rw [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, simp,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], simp [list.ret]
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp [sublists_aux_cons_append, sublists, map_id']
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by simp [sublists_append];
rw [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁];
simp [map_id', sublists_aux₁]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l; simp [(∘), *]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp [sublists_eq_sublists', map_id']
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro; simp [not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_inj reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp [sublists_eq_sublists', length_sublists']
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2
(singleton_sublist.2 $ mem_map.2 ⟨[], by simp [list.ret]⟩)).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/- transpose -/
def transpose_aux : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] ls := ls
| (a::i) [] := [a] :: transpose_aux i []
| (a::i) (l::ls) := (a::l) :: transpose_aux i ls
/-- transpose of a list of lists, treated as a matrix.
`transpose [[1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6]] = [[1, 3, 5], [2, 4, 6]]` -/
def transpose : list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] := []
| (l::ls) := transpose_aux l (transpose ls)
/- forall₂ -/
section forall₂
variables {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
open relator relation
inductive forall₂ (R : α → β → Prop) : list α → list β → Prop
| nil {} : forall₂ [] []
| cons {a b l₁ l₂} : R a b → forall₂ l₁ l₂ → forall₂ (a::l₁) (b::l₂)
run_cmd tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop `list.forall₂ `list.forall₂_iff
attribute [simp] forall₂.nil
@[simp] theorem forall₂_cons {R : α → β → Prop} {a b l₁ l₂} :
forall₂ R (a::l₁) (b::l₂) ↔ R a b ∧ forall₂ R l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with h₁ h₂; simp *, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, forall₂.cons h₁ h₂⟩
lemma forall₂_flip : ∀{a b}, forall₂ (flip r) b a → forall₂ r a b
| _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := forall₂.cons h₁ (forall₂_flip h₂)
lemma forall₂_same {r : α → α → Prop} : ∀{l}, (∀x∈l, r x x) → forall₂ r l l
| [] _ := forall₂.nil
| (a::as) h := forall₂.cons
(h _ (mem_cons_self _ _))
(forall₂_same $ assume a ha, h a $ mem_cons_of_mem _ ha)
lemma forall₂_refl {r} [is_refl α r] (l : list α) : forall₂ r l l :=
forall₂_same $ assume a h, is_refl.refl _ _
lemma forall₂_eq_eq_eq : forall₂ ((=) : α → α → Prop) = (=) :=
begin
funext a b, apply propext,
split,
{ assume h, induction h; simp * },
{ assume h, subst h, exact forall₂_refl _ }
end
@[simp] lemma forall₂_nil_left_iff {l} : forall₂ r nil l ↔ l = nil :=
by rw [forall₂_iff]; simp
@[simp] lemma forall₂_nil_right_iff {l} : forall₂ r l nil ↔ l = nil :=
by rw [forall₂_iff]; simp
lemma forall₂_cons_left_iff {a l u} : forall₂ r (a::l) u ↔ (∃b u', r a b ∧ forall₂ r l u' ∧ u = b :: u') :=
iff.intro
(assume h, match u, h with (b :: u'), forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ := ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ end)
(assume h, match u, h with _, ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ end)
lemma forall₂_cons_right_iff {b l u} :
forall₂ r u (b::l) ↔ (∃a u', r a b ∧ forall₂ r u' l ∧ u = a :: u') :=
iff.intro
(assume h, match u, h with (b :: u'), forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ := ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ end)
(assume h, match u, h with _, ⟨b, u', h₁, h₂, rfl⟩ := forall₂.cons h₁ h₂ end)
@[simp] lemma forall₂_map_left_iff {f : γ → α} :
∀{l u}, forall₂ r (map f l) u ↔ forall₂ (λc b, r (f c) b) l u
| [] _ := by simp
| (a::l) _ := by simp [forall₂_cons_left_iff, forall₂_map_left_iff]
@[simp] lemma forall₂_map_right_iff {f : γ → β} :
∀{l u}, forall₂ r l (map f u) ↔ forall₂ (λa c, r a (f c)) l u
| _ [] := by simp
| _ (b::u) := by simp [forall₂_cons_right_iff, forall₂_map_right_iff]
lemma left_unique_forall₂ (hr : left_unique r) : left_unique (forall₂ r)
| a₀ nil a₁ forall₂.nil forall₂.nil := rfl
| (a₀::l₀) (b::l) (a₁::l₁) (forall₂.cons ha₀ h₀) (forall₂.cons ha₁ h₁) :=
hr ha₀ ha₁ ▸ left_unique_forall₂ h₀ h₁ ▸ rfl
lemma right_unique_forall₂ (hr : right_unique r) : right_unique (forall₂ r)
| nil a₀ a₁ forall₂.nil forall₂.nil := rfl
| (b::l) (a₀::l₀) (a₁::l₁) (forall₂.cons ha₀ h₀) (forall₂.cons ha₁ h₁) :=
hr ha₀ ha₁ ▸ right_unique_forall₂ h₀ h₁ ▸ rfl
lemma bi_unique_forall₂ (hr : bi_unique r) : bi_unique (forall₂ r) :=
⟨assume a b c, left_unique_forall₂ hr.1, assume a b c, right_unique_forall₂ hr.2⟩
theorem forall₂_length_eq {R : α → β → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ l₂}, forall₂ R l₁ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂
| _ _ forall₂.nil := rfl
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := congr_arg succ (forall₂_length_eq h₂)
theorem forall₂_zip {R : α → β → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ l₂}, forall₂ R l₁ l₂ → ∀ {a b}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → R a b
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) x y (or.inl rfl) := h₁
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) x y (or.inr h₃) := forall₂_zip h₂ h₃
theorem forall₂_iff_zip {R : α → β → Prop} {l₁ l₂} : forall₂ R l₁ l₂ ↔
length l₁ = length l₂ ∧ ∀ {a b}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → R a b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨forall₂_length_eq h, @forall₂_zip _ _ _ _ _ h⟩,
λ h, begin
cases h with h₁ h₂,
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂,
{ simp [length_eq_zero.1 h₁.symm] },
{ cases l₂ with b l₂; injection h₁ with h₁,
exact forall₂.cons (h₂ $ or.inl rfl) (IH h₁ $ λ a b h, h₂ $ or.inr h) }
end⟩
lemma rel_mem (hr : bi_unique r) : (r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ iff) (∈) (∈)
| a b h [] [] forall₂.nil := by simp
| a b h (a'::as) (b'::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := rel_or (rel_eq hr h h₁) (rel_mem h h₂)
lemma rel_map : ((r ⇒ p) ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ p) map map
| f g h [] [] forall₂.nil := by simp [forall₂.nil]
| f g h (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := forall₂.cons (h h₁) (rel_map @h h₂)
lemma rel_append : (forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r) append append
| [] [] h l₁ l₂ hl := hl
| (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) l₁ l₂ hl := forall₂.cons h₁ (rel_append h₂ hl)
lemma rel_join : (forall₂ (forall₂ r) ⇒ forall₂ r) join join
| [] [] forall₂.nil := by simp [forall₂.nil]
| (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) := rel_append h₁ (rel_join h₂)
lemma rel_bind : (forall₂ r ⇒ (r ⇒ forall₂ p) ⇒ forall₂ p) list.bind list.bind :=
assume a b h₁ f g h₂, rel_join (rel_map @h₂ h₁)
lemma rel_foldl : ((p ⇒ r ⇒ p) ⇒ p ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ p) foldl foldl
| f g hfg _ _ h _ _ forall₂.nil := h
| f g hfg x y hxy _ _ (forall₂.cons hab hs) := rel_foldl @hfg (hfg hxy hab) hs
lemma rel_foldr : ((r ⇒ p ⇒ p) ⇒ p ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ p) foldr foldr
| f g hfg _ _ h _ _ forall₂.nil := h
| f g hfg x y hxy _ _ (forall₂.cons hab hs) := hfg hab (rel_foldr @hfg hxy hs)
lemma rel_filter {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
(hpq : (r ⇒ (↔)) p q) :
(forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r) (filter p) (filter q)
| _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) :=
begin
by_cases p a,
{ have : q b, { rwa [← hpq h₁] },
simp [h, this, h₁, rel_filter h₂], },
{ have : ¬ q b, { rwa [← hpq h₁] },
simp [h, this, h₁, rel_filter h₂], },
end
theorem filter_map_cons (f : α → option β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = option.cases_on (f a) (filter_map f l) (λb, b :: filter_map f l) :=
begin
generalize eq : f a = b,
cases b,
{ simp [filter_map_cons_none _ _ eq]},
{ simp [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ eq]},
end
lemma rel_filter_map {f : α → option γ} {q : β → option δ} :
((r ⇒ option.rel p) ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ p) filter_map filter_map
| f g hfg _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.nil
| f g hfg (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h₁ h₂) :=
by rw [filter_map_cons, filter_map_cons];
from match f a, g b, hfg h₁ with
| _, _, option.rel.none := rel_filter_map @hfg h₂
| _, _, option.rel.some h := forall₂.cons h (rel_filter_map @hfg h₂)
end
@[to_additive list.rel_sum]
lemma rel_prod [monoid α] [monoid β]
(h : r 1 1) (hf : (r ⇒ r ⇒ r) (*) (*)) : (forall₂ r ⇒ r) prod prod :=
assume a b, rel_foldl (assume a b, hf) h
end forall₂
/- sections -/
/-- List of all sections through a list of lists. A section
of `[L₁, L₂, ..., Lₙ]` is a list whose first element comes from
`L₁`, whose second element comes from `L₂`, and so on. -/
def sections : list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (l::L) := bind (sections L) $ λ s, map (λ a, a::s) l
theorem mem_sections {L : list (list α)} {f} : f ∈ sections L ↔ forall₂ (∈) f L :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ induction L generalizing f; simp [sections] at h;
casesm* [Exists _, _ ∧ _, _ = _]; simp * },
{ induction h with a l f L al fL fs; simp [sections],
exact ⟨_, fs, _, al, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_sections_length {L : list (list α)} {f} (h : f ∈ sections L) : length f = length L :=
forall₂_length_eq (mem_sections.1 h)
lemma rel_sections {r : α → β → Prop} : (forall₂ (forall₂ r) ⇒ forall₂ (forall₂ r)) sections sections
| _ _ forall₂.nil := forall₂.cons forall₂.nil forall₂.nil
| _ _ (forall₂.cons h₀ h₁) :=
rel_bind (rel_sections h₁) (assume _ _ hl, rel_map (assume _ _ ha, forall₂.cons ha hl) h₀)
/- permutations -/
section permutations
def permutations_aux2 (t : α) (ts : list α) (r : list β) : list α → (list α → β) → list α × list β
| [] f := (ts, r)
| (y::ys) f := let (us, zs) := permutations_aux2 ys (λx : list α, f (y::x)) in
(y :: us, f (t :: y :: us) :: zs)
private def meas : (Σ'_:list α, list α) → ℕ × ℕ | ⟨l, i⟩ := (length l + length i, length l)
local infix ` ≺ `:50 := inv_image (prod.lex (<) (<)) meas
@[elab_as_eliminator] def permutations_aux.rec {C : list α → list α → Sort v}
(H0 : ∀ is, C [] is)
(H1 : ∀ t ts is, C ts (t::is) → C is [] → C (t::ts) is) : ∀ l₁ l₂, C l₁ l₂
| [] is := H0 is
| (t::ts) is :=
have h1 : ⟨ts, t :: is⟩ ≺ ⟨t :: ts, is⟩, from
show prod.lex _ _ (succ (length ts + length is), length ts) (succ (length ts) + length is, length (t :: ts)),
by rw nat.succ_add; exact prod.lex.right _ _ (lt_succ_self _),
have h2 : ⟨is, []⟩ ≺ ⟨t :: ts, is⟩, from prod.lex.left _ _ _ (lt_add_of_pos_left _ (succ_pos _)),
H1 t ts is (permutations_aux.rec ts (t::is)) (permutations_aux.rec is [])
using_well_founded {
dec_tac := tactic.assumption,
rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨(≺), @inv_image.wf _ _ _ meas (prod.lex_wf lt_wf lt_wf)⟩] }
def permutations_aux : list α → list α → list (list α) :=
@@permutations_aux.rec (λ _ _, list (list α)) (λ is, [])
(λ t ts is IH1 IH2, foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2) IH1 (is :: IH2))
/-- List of all permutations of `l`.
permutations [1, 2, 3] =
[[1, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3], [3, 2, 1],
[2, 3, 1], [3, 1, 2], [1, 3, 2]] -/
def permutations (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
l :: permutations_aux l []
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by simp [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by simp [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec, permutations]
end permutations
/- insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp [insert.def, h]
@[simp] theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp [insert.def, h]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l; simp [h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h'
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; simp *
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by simp [h]
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by simp [h]
end insert
/- erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : (b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp [erase_cons]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) : (b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp [erase_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [(ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l with b l ih; [cases h, {
simp at h,
by_cases e : b = a,
{ subst b, exact ⟨[], l, not_mem_nil _, rfl, by simp⟩ },
{ exact let ⟨l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ih (h.resolve_left (ne.symm e)) in
⟨b::l₁, l₂, not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (ne.symm e) h₁,
by rw h₂; refl,
by simp [e, h₃]⟩ } }]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq h with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, _, rfl, rfl⟩ := by simp [-add_comm]; refl
end
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : x = a; simp [h'],
rw erase_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (ne.symm h') h)
end
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∉ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [*, (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h)]
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
if h : a ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq h with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, _, rfl, rfl⟩ := by simp
end else by simp [h]
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist (erase_sublist a l)
theorem erase_sublist_erase (a : α) : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil := sublist.slnil
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ b s) := if h : b = a
then by rw [h, erase_cons_head]; exact (erase_sublist _ _).trans s
else by rw erase_cons_tail _ h; exact (erase_sublist_erase s).cons _ _ _
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ b s) := if h : b = a
then by rw [h, erase_cons_head, erase_cons_head]; exact s
else by rw [erase_cons_tail _ h, erase_cons_tail _ h]; exact (erase_sublist_erase s).cons2 _ _ _
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erase, λ al,
if h : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase b, exists_erase_eq h, al with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, _, rfl, rfl⟩, al := by simpa [ab] using al
end else by simp [h, al]⟩
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by simp [ab] else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp [hb, mt mem_of_mem_erase hb]
else by simp [ha, mt mem_of_mem_erase ha]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α} :
∀ (l : list α), map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a)
| [] := by simp [list.erase]
| (b::l) := if h : f b = f a then by simp [h, finj h] else by simp [h, mt (congr_arg f) h, map_erase l]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; simp [map_erase finj, *]
end erase
/- diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
by by_cases a ∈ l₁; simp [list.diff, h]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp [diff_eq_foldl]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp [diff_eq_foldl, map_foldl_erase finj]
end diff
/- zip & unzip -/
@[simp] theorem zip_cons_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip (a :: l₁) (b :: l₂) = (a, b) :: zip l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_left (l : list α) : zip ([] : list β) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_right (l : list α) : zip l ([] : list β) = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem unzip_nil : unzip (@nil (α × β)) = ([], []) := rfl
@[simp] theorem unzip_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l : list (α × β)) :
unzip ((a, b) :: l) = (a :: (unzip l).1, b :: (unzip l).2) :=
by rw unzip; cases unzip l; refl
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ (l : list (α × β)), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
| [] := rfl
| ((a, b) :: l) := by simp [zip_unzip l]
/- enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp [enum]
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
/- product -/
/-- `product l₁ l₂` is the list of pairs `(a, b)` where `a ∈ l₁` and `b ∈ l₂`.
product [1, 2] [5, 6] = [(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6)] -/
def product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) : list (α × β) :=
l₁.bind $ λ a, l₂.map $ prod.mk a
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp [product, and.left_comm]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; simp [*, right_distrib]
/- sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
/-- `sigma l₁ l₂` is the list of dependent pairs `(a, b)` where `a ∈ l₁` and `b ∈ l₂ a`.
sigma [1, 2] (λ_, [5, 6]) = [(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6)] -/
protected def sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) : list (Σ a, σ a) :=
l₁.bind $ λ a, (l₂ a).map $ sigma.mk a
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp [list.sigma, and.left_comm]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; simp *
end
/- of_fn -/
def of_fn_aux {n} (f : fin n → α) : ∀ m, m ≤ n → list α → list α
| 0 h l := l
| (succ m) h l := of_fn_aux m (le_of_lt h) (f ⟨m, h⟩ :: l)
def of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) : list α :=
of_fn_aux f n (le_refl _) []
theorem length_of_fn_aux {n} (f : fin n → α) :
∀ m h l, length (of_fn_aux f m h l) = length l + m
| 0 h l := rfl
| (succ m) h l := (length_of_fn_aux m _ _).trans (succ_add _ _)
theorem length_of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) : length (of_fn f) = n :=
(length_of_fn_aux f _ _ _).trans (zero_add _)
def of_fn_nth_val {n} (f : fin n → α) (i : ℕ) : option α :=
if h : _ then some (f ⟨i, h⟩) else none
theorem nth_of_fn_aux {n} (f : fin n → α) (i) :
∀ m h l,
(∀ i, nth l i = of_fn_nth_val f (i + m)) →
nth (of_fn_aux f m h l) i = of_fn_nth_val f i
| 0 h l H := H i
| (succ m) h l H := nth_of_fn_aux m _ _ begin
intro j, cases j with j,
{ simp [of_fn_nth_val, show m < n, from h], refl },
{ simp [H, succ_add, -add_comm] }
end
@[simp] theorem nth_of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) (i) :
nth (of_fn f) i = of_fn_nth_val f i :=
nth_of_fn_aux f _ _ _ _ $ λ i,
by simp [of_fn_nth_val, not_lt.2 (le_add_right n i)]
theorem nth_le_of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) (i : fin n) :
nth_le (of_fn f) i.1 ((length_of_fn f).symm ▸ i.2) = f i :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth];
simp [of_fn_nth_val, i.2]; cases i; refl
theorem array_eq_of_fn {n} (a : array n α) : a.to_list = of_fn a.read :=
suffices ∀ {m h l}, d_array.rev_iterate_aux a
(λ i, cons) m h l = of_fn_aux (d_array.read a) m h l, from this,
begin
intros, induction m with m IH generalizing l, {refl},
simp [d_array.rev_iterate_aux, of_fn_aux, IH]
end
theorem of_fn_zero (f : fin 0 → α) : of_fn f = [] := rfl
theorem of_fn_succ {n} (f : fin (succ n) → α) :
of_fn f = f 0 :: of_fn (λ i, f i.succ) :=
suffices ∀ {m h l}, of_fn_aux f (succ m) (succ_le_succ h) l =
f 0 :: of_fn_aux (λ i, f i.succ) m h l, from this,
begin
intros, induction m with m IH generalizing l, {refl},
rw [of_fn_aux, IH], refl
end
theorem of_fn_nth_le : ∀ l : list α, of_fn (λ i, nth_le l i.1 i.2) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw of_fn_succ; congr; simp; exact of_fn_nth_le l
/- disjoint -/
section disjoint
/-- `disjoint l₁ l₂` means that `l₁` and `l₂` have no elements in common. -/
def disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → false
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
@[simp] theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) : disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp [disjoint]; refl
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp [disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp [disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) : disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
end disjoint
/- union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp [*, or_assoc]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
by simp [e.symm]; by_cases h : a ∈ t ++ l₂;
[existsi t, existsi a::t]; simp [h];
[apply sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, apply cons_sublist_cons _ s]
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/- inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
end inter
/- bag_inter -/
section bag_inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_bag_inter (l : list α) : [].bag_inter l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem bag_inter_nil (l : list α) : l.bag_inter [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem cons_bag_inter_of_pos {a} (l₁ : list α) {l₂} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bag_inter l₂ = a :: l₁.bag_inter (l₂.erase a) :=
by cases l₂; exact if_pos h
@[simp] theorem cons_bag_inter_of_neg {a} (l₁ : list α) {l₂} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bag_inter l₂ = l₁.bag_inter l₂ :=
by cases l₂; simp [h, list.bag_inter]
theorem mem_bag_inter {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁.bag_inter l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂
| [] l₂ := by simp
| (b::l₁) l₂ := by
by_cases b ∈ l₂; simp [*, and_or_distrib_left];
by_cases ba : a = b; simp *
theorem bag_inter_sublist_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.bag_inter l₂ <+ l₁
| [] l₂ := by simp [nil_sublist]
| (b::l₁) l₂ := begin
by_cases b ∈ l₂; simp [h],
{ apply cons_sublist_cons, apply bag_inter_sublist_left },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist, apply bag_inter_sublist_left }
end
end bag_inter
/- pairwise relation (generalized no duplicate) -/
section pairwise
variable (R : α → α → Prop)
/-- `pairwise R l` means that all the elements with earlier indexes are
`R`-related to all the elements with later indexes.
pairwise R [1, 2, 3] ↔ R 1 2 ∧ R 1 3 ∧ R 2 3
For example if `R = (≠)` then it asserts `l` has no duplicates,
and if `R = (<)` then it asserts that `l` is (strictly) sorted. -/
inductive pairwise : list α → Prop
| nil : pairwise []
| cons : ∀ {a : α} {l : list α}, (∀ a' ∈ l, R a a') → pairwise l → pairwise (a::l)
attribute [simp] pairwise.nil
run_cmd tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop `list.pairwise `list.pariwise_iff
variable {R}
@[simp] theorem pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
pairwise R (a::l) ↔ (∀ a' ∈ l, R a a') ∧ pairwise R l :=
⟨λ p, by cases p with a l n p; exact ⟨n, p⟩, λ ⟨n, p⟩, p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R (a::l)) : ∀ {a'}, a' ∈ l → R a a' :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).1
theorem pairwise_of_pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R (a::l)) : pairwise R l :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).2
theorem pairwise.imp_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → R a b → S a b) (p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S l :=
begin
induction p with a l r p IH generalizing H; constructor,
{ exact ball.imp_right
(λ x h, H (mem_cons_self _ _) (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)) r },
{ exact IH (λ a b m m', H
(mem_cons_of_mem _ m) (mem_cons_of_mem _ m')) }
end
theorem pairwise.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {l : list α} : pairwise R l → pairwise S l :=
pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b _ _, H a b)
theorem pairwise.and {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α} :
pairwise (λ a b, R a b ∧ S a b) l ↔ pairwise R l ∧ pairwise S l :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.imp (λ a b h, h.1), h.imp (λ a b h, h.2)⟩,
λ ⟨hR, hS⟩, begin
clear_, induction hR with a l R1 R2 IH; simp at *,
exact ⟨λ b bl, ⟨R1 b bl, hS.1 b bl⟩, IH hS.2⟩
end⟩
theorem pairwise.imp₂ {S : α → α → Prop} {T : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b → T a b) {l : list α}
(hR : pairwise R l) (hS : pairwise S l) : pairwise T l :=
(pairwise.and.2 ⟨hR, hS⟩).imp $ λ a b, and.rec (H a b)
theorem pairwise.iff_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → (R a b ↔ S a b)) : pairwise R l ↔ pairwise S l :=
⟨pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b m m', (H m m').1),
pairwise.imp_of_mem (λ a b m m', (H m m').2)⟩
theorem pairwise.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {l : list α} : pairwise R l ↔ pairwise S l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (λ a b _ _, H a b)
theorem pairwise_of_forall {l : list α} (H : ∀ x y, R x y) : pairwise R l :=
by induction l; simp *
theorem pairwise.and_mem {l : list α} :
pairwise R l ↔ pairwise (λ x y, x ∈ l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (by simp {contextual := tt})
theorem pairwise.imp_mem {l : list α} :
pairwise R l ↔ pairwise (λ x y, x ∈ l → y ∈ l → R x y) l :=
pairwise.iff_of_mem (by simp {contextual := tt})
theorem pairwise_of_sublist : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → pairwise R l₂ → pairwise R l₁
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) (pairwise.cons i n) := pairwise_of_sublist s n
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) (pairwise.cons i n) :=
(pairwise_of_sublist s n).cons (ball.imp_left (subset_of_sublist s) i)
theorem pairwise_singleton (R) (a : α) : pairwise R [a] :=
by simp
theorem pairwise_pair {a b : α} : pairwise R [a, b] ↔ R a b :=
by simp
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : pairwise R (l₁++l₂) ↔
pairwise R l₁ ∧ pairwise R l₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ l₁, ∀ y ∈ l₂, R x y :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; simp [*,
or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
theorem pairwise_app_comm (s : symmetric R) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
pairwise R (l₁++l₂) ↔ pairwise R (l₂++l₁) :=
have ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α,
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₁ → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ l₂ → R x y) →
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₂ → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ l₁ → R x y),
from λ l₁ l₂ a x xm y ym, s (a y ym x xm),
by simp [pairwise_append, and.left_comm]; rw iff.intro (this l₁ l₂) (this l₂ l₁)
theorem pairwise_middle (s : symmetric R) {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
pairwise R (l₁ ++ a::l₂) ↔ pairwise R (a::(l₁++l₂)) :=
show pairwise R (l₁ ++ ([a] ++ l₂)) ↔ pairwise R ([a] ++ l₁ ++ l₂),
by rw [← append_assoc, pairwise_append, @pairwise_append _ _ ([a] ++ l₁), pairwise_app_comm s];
simp only [mem_append, or_comm]
theorem pairwise_map (f : β → α) :
∀ {l : list β}, pairwise R (map f l) ↔ pairwise (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) l
| [] := by simp
| (b::l) :=
have (∀ a b', b' ∈ l → f b' = a → R (f b) a) ↔ ∀ (b' : β), b' ∈ l → R (f b) (f b'), from
forall_swap.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a, forall_swap.trans $ by simp,
by simp *; rw this
theorem pairwise_of_pairwise_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {l : list α}
(p : pairwise S (map f l)) : pairwise R l :=
((pairwise_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem pairwise_map_of_pairwise {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S (map f l) :=
(pairwise_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem pairwise_filter_map (f : β → option α) {l : list β} :
pairwise R (filter_map f l) ↔ pairwise (λ a a' : β, ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), R b b') l :=
let S (a a' : β) := ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), R b b' in
begin
simp, induction l with a l IH; simp,
cases e : f a with b; simp [e, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ e], simp [IH],
show (∀ (a' : α) (x : β), x ∈ l → f x = some a' → R b a') ∧ pairwise S l ↔
(∀ (a' : β), a' ∈ l → ∀ (b' : α), f a' = some b' → R b b') ∧ pairwise S l,
from and_congr ⟨λ h b mb a ma, h a b mb ma, λ h a b mb ma, h b mb a ma⟩ iff.rfl
end
theorem pairwise_filter_map_of_pairwise {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → option β)
(H : ∀ (a a' : α), R a a' → ∀ (b ∈ f a) (b' ∈ f a'), S b b') {l : list α}
(p : pairwise R l) : pairwise S (filter_map f l) :=
(pairwise_filter_map _).2 $ p.imp H
theorem pairwise_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} :
pairwise R (filter p l) ↔ pairwise (λ x y, p x → p y → R x y) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, pairwise_filter_map],
apply pairwise.iff, simp
end
theorem pairwise_filter_of_pairwise (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l : list α}
: pairwise R l → pairwise R (filter p l) :=
pairwise_of_sublist (filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_join {L : list (list α)} : pairwise R (join L) ↔
(∀ l ∈ L, pairwise R l) ∧ pairwise (λ l₁ l₂, ∀ (x ∈ l₁) (y ∈ l₂), R x y) L :=
begin
induction L with l L IH, {simp},
have : (∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → ∀ (y : α) (x_1 : list α), x_1 ∈ L → y ∈ x_1 → R x y) ↔
∀ (a' : list α), a' ∈ L → ∀ (x : α), x ∈ l → ∀ (y : α), y ∈ a' → R x y :=
⟨λ h a b c d e, h c d e a b, λ h c d e a b, h a b c d e⟩,
simp [pairwise_append, IH, this], simp [and_assoc, and_comm, and.left_comm],
end
@[simp] theorem pairwise_reverse : ∀ {R} {l : list α},
pairwise R (reverse l) ↔ pairwise (λ x y, R y x) l :=
suffices ∀ {R l}, @pairwise α R l → pairwise (λ x y, R y x) (reverse l),
from λ R l, ⟨λ p, reverse_reverse l ▸ this p, this⟩,
λ R l p, by induction p with a l h p IH;
[simp, simpa [pairwise_append, IH] using h]
theorem pairwise_iff_nth_le {R} : ∀ {l : list α},
pairwise R l ↔ ∀ i j (h₁ : j < length l) (h₂ : i < j), R (nth_le l i (lt_trans h₂ h₁)) (nth_le l j h₁)
| [] := by simp; exact λ i j h, (not_lt_zero j).elim h
| (a::l) := begin
rw [pairwise_cons, pairwise_iff_nth_le],
refine ⟨λ H i j h₁ h₂, _, λ H, ⟨λ a' m, _,
λ i j h₁ h₂, H _ _ (succ_lt_succ h₁) (succ_lt_succ h₂)⟩⟩,
{ cases j with j, {exact (not_lt_zero _).elim h₂},
cases i with i,
{ apply H.1, simp [nth_le_mem] },
{ exact H.2 _ _ (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₁) (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₂) } },
{ rcases nth_le_of_mem m with ⟨n, h, rfl⟩,
exact H _ _ (succ_lt_succ h) (succ_pos _) }
end
theorem pairwise_sublists' {R} : ∀ {l : list α}, pairwise R l →
pairwise (lex (swap R)) (sublists' l)
| _ (pairwise.nil _) := pairwise_singleton _ _
| _ (@pairwise.cons _ _ a l H₁ H₂) :=
begin
simp [pairwise_append, pairwise_map],
have IH := pairwise_sublists' H₂,
refine ⟨IH, IH.imp (λ l₁ l₂, lex.cons), _⟩,
intros l₁ sl₁ x l₂ sl₂ e, subst e,
cases l₁ with b l₁, {constructor},
exact lex.rel (H₁ _ $ subset_of_sublist sl₁ $ mem_cons_self _ _)
end
theorem pairwise_sublists {R} {l : list α} (H : pairwise R l) :
pairwise (λ l₁ l₂, lex R (reverse l₁) (reverse l₂)) (sublists l) :=
by have := pairwise_sublists' (pairwise_reverse.2 H);
rwa [sublists'_reverse, pairwise_map] at this
variable [decidable_rel R]
instance decidable_pairwise (l : list α) : decidable (pairwise R l) :=
by induction l; simp; resetI; apply_instance
/- pairwise reduct -/
/-- `pw_filter R l` is a maximal sublist of `l` which is `pairwise R`.
`pw_filter (≠)` is the erase duplicates function, and `pw_filter (<)` finds
a maximal increasing subsequence in `l`. For example,
pw_filter (<) [0, 1, 5, 2, 6, 3, 4] = [0, 1, 5, 6] -/
def pw_filter (R : α → α → Prop) [decidable_rel R] : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (x :: xs) := let IH := pw_filter xs in if ∀ y ∈ IH, R x y then x :: IH else IH
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_nil : pw_filter R [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) :
pw_filter R (a::l) = a :: pw_filter R l := if_pos h
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ ∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) :
pw_filter R (a::l) = pw_filter R l := if_neg h
theorem pw_filter_sublist : ∀ (l : list α), pw_filter R l <+ l
| [] := nil_sublist _
| (x::l) := begin
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y); dsimp at h,
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact cons_sublist_cons _ (pw_filter_sublist l) },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ (pw_filter_sublist l) },
end
theorem pw_filter_subset (l : list α) : pw_filter R l ⊆ l :=
subset_of_sublist (pw_filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_pw_filter : ∀ (l : list α), pairwise R (pw_filter R l)
| [] := pairwise.nil _
| (x::l) := begin
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y); dsimp at h,
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact pairwise_cons.2 ⟨h, pairwise_pw_filter l⟩ },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
exact pairwise_pw_filter l },
end
theorem pw_filter_eq_self {l : list α} : pw_filter R l = l ↔ pairwise R l :=
⟨λ e, e ▸ pairwise_pw_filter l, λ p, begin
induction l with x l IH, {simp},
cases pairwise_cons.1 p with al p,
rw [pw_filter_cons_of_pos (ball.imp_left (pw_filter_subset l) al), IH p],
end⟩
@[simp] theorem pw_filter_idempotent {l : list α} :
pw_filter R (pw_filter R l) = pw_filter R l :=
pw_filter_eq_self.mpr (pairwise_pw_filter l)
theorem forall_mem_pw_filter (neg_trans : ∀ {x y z}, R x z → R x y ∨ R y z)
(a : α) (l : list α) : (∀ b ∈ pw_filter R l, R a b) ↔ (∀ b ∈ l, R a b) :=
⟨begin
induction l with x l IH; simp *,
by_cases (∀ y ∈ pw_filter R l, R x y); dsimp at h,
{ simp [pw_filter_cons_of_pos h],
exact λ r H, ⟨r, IH H⟩ },
{ rw [pw_filter_cons_of_neg h],
refine λ H, ⟨_, IH H⟩,
cases e : find (λ y, ¬ R x y) (pw_filter R l) with k,
{ refine h.elim (ball.imp_right _ (find_eq_none.1 e)),
exact λ y _, not_not.1 },
{ have := find_some e,
exact (neg_trans (H k (find_mem e))).resolve_right this } }
end, ball.imp_left (pw_filter_subset l)⟩
end pairwise
/- chain relation (conjunction of R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d ...) -/
section chain
variable (R : α → α → Prop)
/-- `chain R a l` means that `R` holds between adjacent elements of `a::l`.
`chain R a [b, c, d] ↔ R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d` -/
inductive chain : α → list α → Prop
| nil (a : α) : chain a []
| cons : ∀ {a b : α} {l : list α}, R a b → chain b l → chain a (b::l)
attribute [simp] chain.nil
run_cmd tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop `list.chain `list.chain_iff
variable {R}
@[simp] theorem chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a (b::l) ↔ R a b ∧ chain R b l :=
⟨λ p, by cases p with _ a b l n p; exact ⟨n, p⟩, λ ⟨n, p⟩, p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem chain.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} (p : chain R a l) : chain S a l :=
by induction p with _ a b l r p IH; constructor;
[exact H _ _ r, exact IH]
theorem chain.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} : chain R a l ↔ chain S a l :=
⟨chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).1), chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).2)⟩
theorem chain.iff_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ chain (λ x y, x ∈ a :: l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) a l :=
⟨λ p, by induction p with _ a b l r p IH; constructor;
[exact ⟨mem_cons_self _ _, mem_cons_self _ _, r⟩,
exact IH.imp (λ a b ⟨am, bm, h⟩,
⟨mem_cons_of_mem _ am, mem_cons_of_mem _ bm, h⟩)],
chain.imp (λ a b h, h.2.2)⟩
theorem chain_singleton {a b : α} : chain R a [b] ↔ R a b :=
by simp
theorem chain_split {a b : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : chain R a (l₁++b::l₂) ↔
chain R a (l₁++[b]) ∧ chain R b l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH generalizing a; simp [*, and_assoc]
theorem chain_map (f : β → α) {b : β} {l : list β} :
chain R (f b) (map f l) ↔ chain (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) b l :=
by induction l generalizing b; simp *
theorem chain_of_chain_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain S (f a) (map f l)) : chain R a l :=
((chain_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem chain_map_of_chain {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a l) : chain S (f a) (map f l) :=
(chain_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem chain_of_pairwise {a : α} {l : list α} (p : pairwise R (a::l)) : chain R a l :=
begin
cases pairwise_cons.1 p with r p', clear p,
induction p' with b l r' p IH generalizing a; simp,
simp at r, simp [r],
show chain R b l, from IH r'
end
theorem chain_iff_pairwise (tr : transitive R) {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ pairwise R (a::l) :=
⟨λ c, begin
induction c with b b c l r p IH, {simp},
apply IH.cons _, simp [r],
show ∀ x ∈ l, R b x, from λ x m, (tr r (rel_of_pairwise_cons IH m)),
end, chain_of_pairwise⟩
instance decidable_chain [decidable_rel R] (a : α) (l : list α) : decidable (chain R a l) :=
by induction l generalizing a; simp; resetI; apply_instance
end chain
/- no duplicates predicate -/
/-- `nodup l` means that `l` has no duplicates, that is, any element appears at most
once in the list. It is defined as `pairwise (≠)`. -/
def nodup : list α → Prop := pairwise (≠)
section nodup
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_ne {a : α} {l : list α} : (∀ (a' : α), a' ∈ l → ¬a = a') ↔ a ∉ l :=
⟨λ h m, h _ m rfl, λ h a' m e, h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_nil : @nodup α [] := pairwise.nil _
@[simp] theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : nodup (a::l) ↔ a ∉ l ∧ nodup l :=
by simp [nodup]
lemma rel_nodup {r : α → β → Prop} (hr : relator.bi_unique r) : (forall₂ r ⇒ (↔)) nodup nodup
| _ _ forall₂.nil := by simp
| _ _ (forall₂.cons hab h) :=
by simpa using relator.rel_and (relator.rel_not (rel_mem hr hab h)) (rel_nodup h)
theorem nodup_cons_of_nodup {a : α} {l : list α} (m : a ∉ l) (n : nodup l) : nodup (a::l) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨m, n⟩
theorem nodup_singleton (a : α) : nodup [a] :=
nodup_cons_of_nodup (not_mem_nil a) nodup_nil
theorem nodup_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : nodup l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
theorem not_mem_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup (a::l)) : a ∉ l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
theorem not_nodup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l → ¬ nodup (a :: l) :=
imp_not_comm.1 not_mem_of_nodup_cons
theorem nodup_of_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → nodup l₂ → nodup l₁ :=
pairwise_of_sublist
theorem not_nodup_pair (a : α) : ¬ nodup [a, a] :=
not_nodup_cons_of_mem $ mem_singleton_self _
theorem nodup_iff_sublist {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, ¬ [a, a] <+ l :=
⟨λ d a h, not_nodup_pair a (nodup_of_sublist h d), begin
induction l with a l IH; intro h, {simp},
exact nodup_cons_of_nodup
(λ al, h a $ cons_sublist_cons _ $ singleton_sublist.2 al)
(IH $ λ a s, h a $ sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s)
end⟩
theorem nodup_iff_nth_le_inj {l : list α} :
nodup l ↔ ∀ i j h₁ h₂, nth_le l i h₁ = nth_le l j h₂ → i = j :=
pairwise_iff_nth_le.trans
⟨λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ((lt_trichotomy _ _)
.resolve_left (λ h', H _ _ h₂ h' h))
.resolve_right (λ h', H _ _ h₁ h' h.symm),
λ H i j h₁ h₂ h, ne_of_lt h₂ (H _ _ _ _ h)⟩
@[simp] theorem nth_le_index_of [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} (H : nodup l) (n h) : index_of (nth_le l n h) l = n :=
nodup_iff_nth_le_inj.1 H _ _ _ h $
index_of_nth_le $ index_of_lt_length.2 $ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} : nodup l ↔ ∀ a, count a l ≤ 1 :=
nodup_iff_sublist.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a,
have [a, a] <+ l ↔ 1 < count a l, from (@le_count_iff_repeat_sublist _ _ a l 2).symm,
(not_congr this).trans not_lt
@[simp] theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α}
(d : nodup l) (h : a ∈ l) : count a l = 1 :=
le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (count_pos.2 h)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₁ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₂ :=
nodup_of_sublist (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup l₁ ∧ nodup l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp [nodup, pairwise_append, disjoint_iff_ne]
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : nodup (l₁++l₂)) : disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(nodup_append.1 d).2.2
theorem nodup_append_of_nodup {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) (dj : disjoint l₁ l₂) : nodup (l₁++l₂) :=
nodup_append.2 ⟨d₁, d₂, dj⟩
theorem nodup_app_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁++l₂) ↔ nodup (l₂++l₁) :=
by simp [nodup_append, and.left_comm]
theorem nodup_middle {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : nodup (l₁ ++ a::l₂) ↔ nodup (a::(l₁++l₂)) :=
by simp [nodup_append, not_or_distrib, and.left_comm, and_assoc]
theorem nodup_of_nodup_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} : nodup (map f l) → nodup l :=
pairwise_of_pairwise_map f $ λ a b, mt $ congr_arg f
theorem nodup_map_on {f : α → β} {l : list α} (H : ∀x∈l, ∀y∈l, f x = f y → x = y)
(d : nodup l) : nodup (map f l) :=
pairwise_map_of_pairwise _ (by exact λ a b ⟨ma, mb, n⟩ e, n (H a ma b mb e)) (pairwise.and_mem.1 d)
theorem nodup_map {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup l → nodup (map f l) :=
nodup_map_on (assume x _ y _ h, hf h)
theorem nodup_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} (hf : injective f) : nodup (map f l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨nodup_of_nodup_map _, nodup_map hf⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_attach {l : list α} : nodup (attach l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, attach_map_val l ▸ nodup_map (λ a b, subtype.eq) h,
λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map subtype.val ((attach_map_val l).symm ▸ h)⟩
theorem nodup_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {l : list α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h : nodup l) : nodup (pmap f l H) :=
by rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]; exact nodup_map
(λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h, by congr; exact hf a (H _ ha) b (H _ hb) h)
(nodup_attach.2 h)
theorem nodup_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {l} : nodup l → nodup (filter p l) :=
pairwise_filter_of_pairwise p
@[simp] theorem nodup_reverse {l : list α} : nodup (reverse l) ↔ nodup l :=
pairwise_reverse.trans $ by simp [nodup, eq_comm]
instance nodup_decidable [decidable_eq α] : ∀ l : list α, decidable (nodup l) :=
list.decidable_pairwise
theorem nodup_erase_eq_filter [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} (d : nodup l) : l.erase a = filter (≠ a) l :=
begin
induction d with b l m d IH; simp [list.erase, list.filter],
by_cases b = a; simp *, subst b,
show l = filter (λ a', ¬ a' = a) l, rw filter_eq_self.2,
simpa only [eq_comm] using m
end
theorem nodup_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} : nodup l → nodup (l.erase a) :=
nodup_of_sublist (erase_sublist _ _)
theorem mem_erase_iff_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a b : α} {l} (d : nodup l) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l :=
by rw nodup_erase_eq_filter b d; simp [and_comm]
theorem mem_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l} (h : nodup l) : a ∉ l.erase a :=
by rw mem_erase_iff_of_nodup h; simp
theorem nodup_join {L : list (list α)} : nodup (join L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, nodup l) ∧ pairwise disjoint L :=
by simp [nodup, pairwise_join, disjoint_left.symm]
theorem nodup_bind {l₁ : list α} {f : α → list β} : nodup (l₁.bind f) ↔
(∀ x ∈ l₁, nodup (f x)) ∧ pairwise (λ (a b : α), disjoint (f a) (f b)) l₁ :=
by simp [list.bind, nodup_join, pairwise_map, and_comm, and.left_comm];
rw [show (∀ (l : list β) (x : α), f x = l → x ∈ l₁ → nodup l) ↔
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ l₁ → nodup (f x)),
from forall_swap.trans $ forall_congr $ λ_, by simp]
theorem nodup_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) :
nodup (product l₁ l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (injective_of_left_inverse (λ b, (rfl : (a,b).2 = b))) d₂,
d₁.imp (λ a₁ a₂ n x,
suffices ∀ (b₁ : β), b₁ ∈ l₂ → (a₁, b₁) = x → ∀ (b₂ : β), b₂ ∈ l₂ → (a₂, b₂) ≠ x, by simpa,
λ b₁ mb₁ e b₂ mb₂ e', by subst e'; injection e; contradiction)⟩
theorem nodup_sigma {σ : α → Type*} {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)}
(d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : ∀ a, nodup (l₂ a)) : nodup (l₁.sigma l₂) :=
nodup_bind.2
⟨λ a ma, nodup_map (λ b b' h, by injection h with _ h; exact eq_of_heq h) (d₂ a),
d₁.imp (λ a₁ a₂ n x,
suffices ∀ (b₁ : σ a₁), sigma.mk a₁ b₁ = x → b₁ ∈ l₂ a₁ →
∀ (b₂ : σ a₂), sigma.mk a₂ b₂ = x → b₂ ∉ l₂ a₂, by simpa [and_comm],
λ b₁ e mb₁ b₂ e' mb₂, by subst e'; injection e; contradiction)⟩
theorem nodup_filter_map {f : α → option β} {l : list α}
(H : ∀ (a a' : α) (b : β), b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') :
nodup l → nodup (filter_map f l) :=
pairwise_filter_map_of_pairwise f $ λ a a' n b bm b' bm' e, n $ H a a' b' (e ▸ bm) bm'
theorem nodup_concat {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) (h' : nodup l) : nodup (concat l a) :=
by simp; exact nodup_append_of_nodup h' (nodup_singleton _) (disjoint_singleton.2 h)
theorem nodup_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : nodup l) : nodup (insert a l) :=
by by_cases h' : a ∈ l; simp [h', h]; apply nodup_cons h' h
theorem nodup_union [decidable_eq α] (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : nodup l₂) :
nodup (l₁ ∪ l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ ih generalizing l₂,
{ exact h },
simp,
apply nodup_insert,
exact ih h
end
theorem nodup_inter_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {l₁ : list α} (l₂) : nodup l₁ → nodup (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
nodup_filter _
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists {l : list α} : nodup (sublists l) ↔ nodup l :=
⟨λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map _ (nodup_of_sublist (map_ret_sublist_sublists _) h),
λ h, (pairwise_sublists h).imp (λ _ _ h, mt reverse_inj.2 h.to_ne)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_sublists' {l : list α} : nodup (sublists' l) ↔ nodup l :=
by rw [sublists'_eq_sublists, nodup_map_iff reverse_injective,
nodup_sublists, nodup_reverse]
end nodup
/- erase duplicates function -/
section erase_dup
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `erase_dup l` removes duplicates from `l` (taking only the first occurrence).
erase_dup [1, 2, 2, 0, 1] = [1, 2, 0] -/
def erase_dup : list α → list α := pw_filter (≠)
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_nil : erase_dup [] = ([] : list α) := rfl
theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ erase_dup l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_neg $ by simpa using h
theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ erase_dup l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = a :: erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_pos $ by simpa using h
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_dup {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ erase_dup l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simpa using not_congr (@forall_mem_pw_filter α (≠) _
(λ x y z xz, not_and_distrib.1 $ mt (and.rec eq.trans) xz) a l)
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = erase_dup l :=
erase_dup_cons_of_mem' $ mem_erase_dup.2 h
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
erase_dup (a::l) = a :: erase_dup l :=
erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' $ mt mem_erase_dup.1 h
theorem erase_dup_sublist : ∀ (l : list α), erase_dup l <+ l := pw_filter_sublist
theorem erase_dup_subset : ∀ (l : list α), erase_dup l ⊆ l := pw_filter_subset
theorem subset_erase_dup (l : list α) : l ⊆ erase_dup l :=
λ a, mem_erase_dup.2
theorem nodup_erase_dup : ∀ l : list α, nodup (erase_dup l) := pairwise_pw_filter
theorem erase_dup_eq_self {l : list α} : erase_dup l = l ↔ nodup l := pw_filter_eq_self
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_idempotent {l : list α} : erase_dup (erase_dup l) = erase_dup l :=
pw_filter_idempotent
theorem erase_dup_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ∪ erase_dup l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH; simp, rw ← IH,
show erase_dup (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) = insert a (erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂)),
by_cases a ∈ erase_dup (l₁ ++ l₂);
[ rw [erase_dup_cons_of_mem' h, insert_of_mem h],
rw [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem' h, insert_of_not_mem h]]
end
end erase_dup
/- iota and range -/
/-- `range' s n` is the list of numbers `[s, s+1, ..., s+n-1]`.
It is intended mainly for proving properties of `range` and `iota`. -/
@[simp] def range' : ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| s 0 := []
| s (n+1) := s :: range' (s+1) n
@[simp] theorem length_range' : ∀ (s n : ℕ), length (range' s n) = n
| s 0 := rfl
| s (n+1) := congr_arg succ (length_range' _ _)
@[simp] theorem mem_range' {m : ℕ} : ∀ {s n : ℕ}, m ∈ range' s n ↔ s ≤ m ∧ m < s + n
| s 0 := by simp
| s (n+1) :=
have m = s → m < s + (n + 1),
from λ e, e ▸ lt_succ_of_le (le_add_right _ _),
have l : m = s ∨ s + 1 ≤ m ↔ s ≤ m,
by simpa [eq_comm] using (@le_iff_eq_or_lt _ _ s m).symm,
by simp [@mem_range' (s+1) n, or_and_distrib_left, or_iff_right_of_imp this, l]
theorem map_add_range' (a) : ∀ s n : ℕ, map ((+) a) (range' s n) = range' (a + s) n
| s 0 := rfl
| s (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (map_add_range' (s+1) n)
theorem chain_succ_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, chain (λ a b, b = succ a) s (range' (s+1) n)
| s 0 := chain.nil _ _
| s (n+1) := (chain_succ_range' (s+1) n).cons rfl
theorem chain_lt_range' (s n : ℕ) : chain (<) s (range' (s+1) n) :=
(chain_succ_range' s n).imp (λ a b e, e.symm ▸ lt_succ_self _)
theorem pairwise_lt_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, pairwise (<) (range' s n)
| s 0 := pairwise.nil _
| s (n+1) := (chain_iff_pairwise (by exact λ a b c, lt_trans)).1 (chain_lt_range' s n)
theorem nodup_range' (s n : ℕ) : nodup (range' s n) :=
(pairwise_lt_range' s n).imp (λ a b, ne_of_lt)
theorem range'_append : ∀ s m n : ℕ, range' s m ++ range' (s+m) n = range' s (n+m)
| s 0 n := rfl
| s (m+1) n := show s :: (range' (s+1) m ++ range' (s+m+1) n) = s :: range' (s+1) (n+m),
by rw [add_right_comm, range'_append]
theorem range'_sublist_right {s m n : ℕ} : range' s m <+ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by rw [← nat.sub_add_cancel h, ← range'_append]; apply sublist_append_left⟩
theorem range'_subset_right {s m n : ℕ} : range' s m ⊆ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn, lt_irrefl (s+n) $
(mem_range'.1 $ h $ mem_range'.2 ⟨le_add_right _ _, nat.add_lt_add_left hn s⟩).2,
λ h, subset_of_sublist (range'_sublist_right.2 h)⟩
theorem nth_range' : ∀ s {m n : ℕ}, m < n → nth (range' s n) m = some (s + m)
| s 0 (n+1) _ := by simp
| s (m+1) (n+1) h := by simp [nth_range' (s+1) (lt_of_add_lt_add_right h)]
theorem range'_concat (s n : ℕ) : range' s (n + 1) = range' s n ++ [s+n] :=
by rw add_comm n 1; exact (range'_append s n 1).symm
theorem range_core_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ, range_core s (range' s n) = range' 0 (n + s)
| 0 n := rfl
| (s+1) n := by rw [show n+(s+1) = n+1+s, by simp]; exact range_core_range' s (n+1)
theorem range_eq_range' (n : ℕ) : range n = range' 0 n :=
(range_core_range' n 0).trans $ by rw zero_add
theorem range_succ_eq_map (n : ℕ) : range (n + 1) = 0 :: map succ (range n) :=
by rw [range_eq_range', range_eq_range', range',
add_comm, ← map_add_range'];
congr; exact funext one_add
theorem range'_eq_map_range (s n : ℕ) : range' s n = map ((+) s) (range n) :=
by rw [range_eq_range', map_add_range']; refl
@[simp] theorem length_range (n : ℕ) : length (range n) = n :=
by simp [range_eq_range']
theorem pairwise_lt_range (n : ℕ) : pairwise (<) (range n) :=
by simp [range_eq_range', pairwise_lt_range']
theorem nodup_range (n : ℕ) : nodup (range n) :=
by simp [range_eq_range', nodup_range']
theorem range_sublist {m n : ℕ} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by simp [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
theorem range_subset {m n : ℕ} : range m ⊆ range n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by simp [range_eq_range', range'_subset_right]
@[simp] theorem mem_range {m n : ℕ} : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n :=
by simp [range_eq_range', zero_le]
@[simp] theorem not_mem_range_self {n : ℕ} : n ∉ range n :=
mt mem_range.1 $ lt_irrefl _
theorem nth_range {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : nth (range n) m = some m :=
by simp [range_eq_range', nth_range' _ h]
theorem range_concat (n : ℕ) : range (n + 1) = range n ++ [n] :=
by simp [range_eq_range', range'_concat]
theorem iota_eq_reverse_range' : ∀ n : ℕ, iota n = reverse (range' 1 n)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by simp [iota, range'_concat, iota_eq_reverse_range' n]
@[simp] theorem length_iota (n : ℕ) : length (iota n) = n :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range']
theorem pairwise_gt_iota (n : ℕ) : pairwise (>) (iota n) :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', pairwise_lt_range']
theorem nodup_iota (n : ℕ) : nodup (iota n) :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', nodup_range']
theorem mem_iota {m n : ℕ} : m ∈ iota n ↔ 1 ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n :=
by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', lt_succ_iff]
theorem reverse_range' : ∀ s n : ℕ,
reverse (range' s n) = map (λ i, s + n - 1 - i) (range n)
| s 0 := rfl
| s (n+1) := by rw [range'_concat, reverse_append, range_succ_eq_map];
simpa [show s + (n + 1) - 1 = s + n, from rfl, (∘),
λ a i, show a - 1 - i = a - succ i,
by rw [nat.sub_sub, add_comm]; refl]
using reverse_range' s n
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_fst : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.fst (enum_from n l) = range' n l.length
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_fst _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_fst (l : list α) :
map prod.fst (enum l) = range l.length :=
by simp [enum, range_eq_range']
end list
theorem option.to_list_nodup {α} (o : option α) : o.to_list.nodup :=
by cases o; simp [option.to_list]
|
644667384e2d634e30e1e4c5d1ad2ae0acc08122 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/category_theory/glue_data.lean | 94b388c7c0448bb3d444ba865f9387317f265d50 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,673 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import tactic.elementwise
import category_theory.limits.shapes.multiequalizer
import category_theory.limits.constructions.epi_mono
import category_theory.limits.preserves.limits
import category_theory.limits.shapes.types
/-!
# Gluing data
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
We define `glue_data` as a family of data needed to glue topological spaces, schemes, etc. We
provide the API to realize it as a multispan diagram, and also states lemmas about its
interaction with a functor that preserves certain pullbacks.
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory
universes v u₁ u₂
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v} C] {C' : Type u₂} [category.{v} C']
/--
A gluing datum consists of
1. An index type `J`
2. An object `U i` for each `i : J`.
3. An object `V i j` for each `i j : J`.
4. A monomorphism `f i j : V i j ⟶ U i` for each `i j : J`.
5. A transition map `t i j : V i j ⟶ V j i` for each `i j : J`.
such that
6. `f i i` is an isomorphism.
7. `t i i` is the identity.
8. The pullback for `f i j` and `f i k` exists.
9. `V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V i j ⟶ V j i` factors through `V j k ×[U j] V j i ⟶ V j i` via some
`t' : V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V j k ×[U j] V j i`.
10. `t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _`.
-/
@[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure glue_data :=
(J : Type v)
(U : J → C)
(V : J × J → C)
(f : Π i j, V (i, j) ⟶ U i)
(f_mono : ∀ i j, mono (f i j) . tactic.apply_instance)
(f_has_pullback : ∀ i j k, has_pullback (f i j) (f i k) . tactic.apply_instance)
(f_id : ∀ i, is_iso (f i i) . tactic.apply_instance)
(t : Π i j, V (i, j) ⟶ V (j, i))
(t_id : ∀ i, t i i = 𝟙 _)
(t' : Π i j k, pullback (f i j) (f i k) ⟶ pullback (f j k) (f j i))
(t_fac : ∀ i j k, t' i j k ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst ≫ t i j)
(cocycle : ∀ i j k , t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _)
attribute [simp] glue_data.t_id
attribute [instance] glue_data.f_id glue_data.f_mono glue_data.f_has_pullback
attribute [reassoc] glue_data.t_fac glue_data.cocycle
namespace glue_data
variables {C} (D : glue_data C)
@[simp] lemma t'_iij (i j : D.J) : D.t' i i j = (pullback_symmetry _ _).hom :=
begin
have eq₁ := D.t_fac i i j,
have eq₂ := (is_iso.eq_comp_inv (D.f i i)).mpr (@pullback.condition _ _ _ _ _ _ (D.f i j) _),
rw [D.t_id, category.comp_id, eq₂] at eq₁,
have eq₃ := (is_iso.eq_comp_inv (D.f i i)).mp eq₁,
rw [category.assoc, ←pullback.condition, ←category.assoc] at eq₃,
exact mono.right_cancellation _ _
((mono.right_cancellation _ _ eq₃).trans (pullback_symmetry_hom_comp_fst _ _).symm)
end
lemma t'_jii (i j : D.J) : D.t' j i i = pullback.fst ≫ D.t j i ≫ inv pullback.snd :=
by { rw [←category.assoc, ←D.t_fac], simp }
lemma t'_iji (i j : D.J) : D.t' i j i = pullback.fst ≫ D.t i j ≫ inv pullback.snd :=
by { rw [←category.assoc, ←D.t_fac], simp }
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise] lemma t_inv (i j : D.J) :
D.t i j ≫ D.t j i = 𝟙 _ :=
begin
have eq : (pullback_symmetry (D.f i i) (D.f i j)).hom = pullback.snd ≫ inv pullback.fst,
{ simp },
have := D.cocycle i j i,
rw [D.t'_iij, D.t'_jii, D.t'_iji, fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq, eq] at this,
simp only [category.assoc, is_iso.inv_hom_id_assoc] at this,
rw [←is_iso.eq_inv_comp, ←category.assoc, is_iso.comp_inv_eq] at this,
simpa using this,
end
lemma t'_inv (i j k : D.J) : D.t' i j k ≫ (pullback_symmetry _ _).hom ≫
D.t' j i k ≫ (pullback_symmetry _ _).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
begin
rw ← cancel_mono (pullback.fst : pullback (D.f i j) (D.f i k) ⟶ _),
simp [t_fac, t_fac_assoc]
end
instance t_is_iso (i j : D.J) : is_iso (D.t i j) :=
⟨⟨D.t j i, D.t_inv _ _, D.t_inv _ _⟩⟩
instance t'_is_iso (i j k : D.J) : is_iso (D.t' i j k) :=
⟨⟨D.t' j k i ≫ D.t' k i j, D.cocycle _ _ _, (by simpa using D.cocycle _ _ _)⟩⟩
@[reassoc]
lemma t'_comp_eq_pullback_symmetry (i j k : D.J) :
D.t' j k i ≫ D.t' k i j = (pullback_symmetry _ _).hom ≫
D.t' j i k ≫ (pullback_symmetry _ _).hom :=
begin
transitivity inv (D.t' i j k),
{ exact is_iso.eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id (D.cocycle _ _ _) },
{ rw ← cancel_mono (pullback.fst : pullback (D.f i j) (D.f i k) ⟶ _),
simp [t_fac, t_fac_assoc] }
end
/-- (Implementation) The disjoint union of `U i`. -/
def sigma_opens [has_coproduct D.U] : C := ∐ D.U
/-- (Implementation) The diagram to take colimit of. -/
def diagram : multispan_index C :=
{ L := D.J × D.J, R := D.J,
fst_from := _root_.prod.fst, snd_from := _root_.prod.snd,
left := D.V, right := D.U,
fst := λ ⟨i, j⟩, D.f i j,
snd := λ ⟨i, j⟩, D.t i j ≫ D.f j i }
@[simp] lemma diagram_L : D.diagram.L = (D.J × D.J) := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_R : D.diagram.R = D.J := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_fst_from (i j : D.J) : D.diagram.fst_from ⟨i, j⟩ = i := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_snd_from (i j : D.J) : D.diagram.snd_from ⟨i, j⟩ = j := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_fst (i j : D.J) : D.diagram.fst ⟨i, j⟩ = D.f i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_snd (i j : D.J) : D.diagram.snd ⟨i, j⟩ = D.t i j ≫ D.f j i := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_left : D.diagram.left = D.V := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_right : D.diagram.right = D.U := rfl
section
variable [has_multicoequalizer D.diagram]
/-- The glued object given a family of gluing data. -/
def glued : C := multicoequalizer D.diagram
/-- The map `D.U i ⟶ D.glued` for each `i`. -/
def ι (i : D.J) : D.U i ⟶ D.glued :=
multicoequalizer.π D.diagram i
@[simp, elementwise]
lemma glue_condition (i j : D.J) :
D.t i j ≫ D.f j i ≫ D.ι j = D.f i j ≫ D.ι i :=
(category.assoc _ _ _).symm.trans (multicoequalizer.condition D.diagram ⟨i, j⟩).symm
/-- The pullback cone spanned by `V i j ⟶ U i` and `V i j ⟶ U j`.
This will often be a pullback diagram. -/
def V_pullback_cone (i j : D.J) : pullback_cone (D.ι i) (D.ι j) :=
pullback_cone.mk (D.f i j) (D.t i j ≫ D.f j i) (by simp)
variables [has_colimits C]
/-- The projection `∐ D.U ⟶ D.glued` given by the colimit. -/
def π : D.sigma_opens ⟶ D.glued := multicoequalizer.sigma_π D.diagram
instance π_epi : epi D.π := by { unfold π, apply_instance }
end
lemma types_π_surjective (D : glue_data Type*) :
function.surjective D.π := (epi_iff_surjective _).mp infer_instance
lemma types_ι_jointly_surjective (D : glue_data Type*) (x : D.glued) :
∃ i (y : D.U i), D.ι i y = x :=
begin
delta category_theory.glue_data.ι,
simp_rw ← multicoequalizer.ι_sigma_π D.diagram,
rcases D.types_π_surjective x with ⟨x', rfl⟩,
have := colimit.iso_colimit_cocone (types.coproduct_colimit_cocone _),
rw ← (show (colimit.iso_colimit_cocone (types.coproduct_colimit_cocone _)).inv _ = x',
from concrete_category.congr_hom
((colimit.iso_colimit_cocone (types.coproduct_colimit_cocone _)).hom_inv_id) x'),
rcases (colimit.iso_colimit_cocone (types.coproduct_colimit_cocone _)).hom x' with ⟨i, y⟩,
exact ⟨i, y, by { simpa [← multicoequalizer.ι_sigma_π, -multicoequalizer.ι_sigma_π] }⟩
end
variables (F : C ⥤ C') [H : ∀ i j k, preserves_limit (cospan (D.f i j) (D.f i k)) F]
include H
instance (i j k : D.J) : has_pullback (F.map (D.f i j)) (F.map (D.f i k)) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, is_limit_of_has_pullback_of_preserves_limit F (D.f i j) (D.f i k)⟩⟩⟩
/-- A functor that preserves the pullbacks of `f i j` and `f i k` can map a family of glue data. -/
@[simps] def map_glue_data :
glue_data C' :=
{ J := D.J,
U := λ i, F.obj (D.U i),
V := λ i, F.obj (D.V i),
f := λ i j, F.map (D.f i j),
f_mono := λ i j, preserves_mono_of_preserves_limit _ _,
f_id := λ i, infer_instance,
t := λ i j, F.map (D.t i j),
t_id := λ i, by { rw D.t_id i, simp },
t' := λ i j k, (preserves_pullback.iso F (D.f i j) (D.f i k)).inv ≫
F.map (D.t' i j k) ≫ (preserves_pullback.iso F (D.f j k) (D.f j i)).hom,
t_fac := λ i j k, by simpa [iso.inv_comp_eq] using congr_arg (λ f, F.map f) (D.t_fac i j k),
cocycle := λ i j k, by simp only [category.assoc, iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, ← functor.map_comp_assoc,
D.cocycle, iso.inv_hom_id, category_theory.functor.map_id, category.id_comp] }
/--
The diagram of the image of a `glue_data` under a functor `F` is naturally isomorphic to the
original diagram of the `glue_data` via `F`.
-/
def diagram_iso : D.diagram.multispan ⋙ F ≅ (D.map_glue_data F).diagram.multispan :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ x, match x with
| walking_multispan.left a := iso.refl _
| walking_multispan.right b := iso.refl _
end)
(begin
rintros (⟨_,_⟩|_) _ (_|_|_),
{ erw [category.comp_id, category.id_comp, functor.map_id], refl },
{ erw [category.comp_id, category.id_comp], refl },
{ erw [category.comp_id, category.id_comp, functor.map_comp], refl },
{ erw [category.comp_id, category.id_comp, functor.map_id], refl },
end)
@[simp] lemma diagram_iso_app_left (i : D.J × D.J) :
(D.diagram_iso F).app (walking_multispan.left i) = iso.refl _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_iso_app_right (i : D.J) :
(D.diagram_iso F).app (walking_multispan.right i) = iso.refl _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_iso_hom_app_left (i : D.J × D.J) :
(D.diagram_iso F).hom.app (walking_multispan.left i) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_iso_hom_app_right (i : D.J) :
(D.diagram_iso F).hom.app (walking_multispan.right i) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_iso_inv_app_left (i : D.J × D.J) :
(D.diagram_iso F).inv.app (walking_multispan.left i) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma diagram_iso_inv_app_right (i : D.J) :
(D.diagram_iso F).inv.app (walking_multispan.right i) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
variables [has_multicoequalizer D.diagram] [preserves_colimit D.diagram.multispan F]
omit H
lemma has_colimit_multispan_comp : has_colimit (D.diagram.multispan ⋙ F) :=
⟨⟨⟨_,preserves_colimit.preserves (colimit.is_colimit _)⟩⟩⟩
include H
local attribute [instance] has_colimit_multispan_comp
lemma has_colimit_map_glue_data_diagram : has_multicoequalizer (D.map_glue_data F).diagram :=
has_colimit_of_iso (D.diagram_iso F).symm
local attribute [instance] has_colimit_map_glue_data_diagram
/-- If `F` preserves the gluing, we obtain an iso between the glued objects. -/
def glued_iso : F.obj D.glued ≅ (D.map_glue_data F).glued :=
preserves_colimit_iso F D.diagram.multispan ≪≫
(limits.has_colimit.iso_of_nat_iso (D.diagram_iso F))
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma ι_glued_iso_hom (i : D.J) :
F.map (D.ι i) ≫ (D.glued_iso F).hom = (D.map_glue_data F).ι i :=
by { erw ι_preserves_colimits_iso_hom_assoc, rw has_colimit.iso_of_nat_iso_ι_hom,
erw category.id_comp, refl }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma ι_glued_iso_inv (i : D.J) :
(D.map_glue_data F).ι i ≫ (D.glued_iso F).inv = F.map (D.ι i) :=
by rw [iso.comp_inv_eq, ι_glued_iso_hom]
/-- If `F` preserves the gluing, and reflects the pullback of `U i ⟶ glued` and `U j ⟶ glued`,
then `F` reflects the fact that `V_pullback_cone` is a pullback. -/
def V_pullback_cone_is_limit_of_map (i j : D.J) [reflects_limit (cospan (D.ι i) (D.ι j)) F]
(hc : is_limit ((D.map_glue_data F).V_pullback_cone i j)) :
is_limit (D.V_pullback_cone i j) :=
begin
apply is_limit_of_reflects F,
apply (is_limit_map_cone_pullback_cone_equiv _ _).symm _,
let e : cospan (F.map (D.ι i)) (F.map (D.ι j)) ≅
cospan ((D.map_glue_data F).ι i) ((D.map_glue_data F).ι j),
exact nat_iso.of_components
(λ x, by { cases x, exacts [D.glued_iso F, iso.refl _] })
(by rintros (_|_) (_|_) (_|_|_); simp),
apply is_limit.postcompose_hom_equiv e _ _,
apply hc.of_iso_limit,
refine cones.ext (iso.refl _) _,
{ rintro (_|_|_),
change _ = _ ≫ (_ ≫ _) ≫ _,
all_goals { change _ = 𝟙 _ ≫ _ ≫ _, simpa } }
end
omit H
/-- If there is a forgetful functor into `Type` that preserves enough (co)limits, then `D.ι` will
be jointly surjective. -/
lemma ι_jointly_surjective (F : C ⥤ Type v) [preserves_colimit D.diagram.multispan F]
[Π (i j k : D.J), preserves_limit (cospan (D.f i j) (D.f i k)) F] (x : F.obj (D.glued)) :
∃ i (y : F.obj (D.U i)), F.map (D.ι i) y = x :=
begin
let e := D.glued_iso F,
obtain ⟨i, y, eq⟩ := (D.map_glue_data F).types_ι_jointly_surjective (e.hom x),
replace eq := congr_arg e.inv eq,
change ((D.map_glue_data F).ι i ≫ e.inv) y = (e.hom ≫ e.inv) x at eq,
rw [e.hom_inv_id, D.ι_glued_iso_inv] at eq,
exact ⟨i, y, eq⟩
end
end glue_data
end category_theory
|
25067ca8a3eff26424ba55004ea39dca1ccd4998 | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /hott/homotopy/interval.hlean | 05bb96132c8345d97b64af2cd21a5406e9493439 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,398 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
Declaration of the interval
-/
import .susp types.eq types.prod cubical.square
open eq susp unit equiv equiv.ops is_trunc nat prod
definition interval : Type₀ := susp unit
namespace interval
definition zero : interval := north
definition one : interval := south
definition seg : zero = one := merid star
protected definition rec {P : interval → Type} (P0 : P zero) (P1 : P one)
(Ps : P0 =[seg] P1) (x : interval) : P x :=
begin
fapply susp.rec_on x,
{ exact P0},
{ exact P1},
{ intro x, cases x, exact Ps}
end
protected definition rec_on [reducible] {P : interval → Type} (x : interval)
(P0 : P zero) (P1 : P one) (Ps : P0 =[seg] P1) : P x :=
interval.rec P0 P1 Ps x
theorem rec_seg {P : interval → Type} (P0 : P zero) (P1 : P one) (Ps : P0 =[seg] P1)
: apdo (interval.rec P0 P1 Ps) seg = Ps :=
!rec_merid
protected definition elim {P : Type} (P0 P1 : P) (Ps : P0 = P1) (x : interval) : P :=
interval.rec P0 P1 (pathover_of_eq Ps) x
protected definition elim_on [reducible] {P : Type} (x : interval) (P0 P1 : P)
(Ps : P0 = P1) : P :=
interval.elim P0 P1 Ps x
theorem elim_seg {P : Type} (P0 P1 : P) (Ps : P0 = P1)
: ap (interval.elim P0 P1 Ps) seg = Ps :=
begin
apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv !(pathover_constant seg),
rewrite [▸*,-apdo_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑interval.elim,rec_seg],
end
protected definition elim_type (P0 P1 : Type) (Ps : P0 ≃ P1) (x : interval) : Type :=
interval.elim P0 P1 (ua Ps) x
protected definition elim_type_on [reducible] (x : interval) (P0 P1 : Type) (Ps : P0 ≃ P1)
: Type :=
interval.elim_type P0 P1 Ps x
theorem elim_type_seg (P0 P1 : Type) (Ps : P0 ≃ P1)
: transport (interval.elim_type P0 P1 Ps) seg = Ps :=
by rewrite [tr_eq_cast_ap_fn,↑interval.elim_type,elim_seg];apply cast_ua_fn
definition is_contr_interval [instance] [priority 900] : is_contr interval :=
is_contr.mk zero (λx, interval.rec_on x idp seg !pathover_eq_r_idp)
open is_equiv equiv
definition naive_funext_of_interval : naive_funext :=
λA P f g p, ap (λ(i : interval) (x : A), interval.elim_on i (f x) (g x) (p x)) seg
end interval open interval
definition cube : ℕ → Type₀
| cube 0 := unit
| cube (succ n) := cube n × interval
abbreviation square := cube (succ (succ nat.zero))
definition cube_one_equiv_interval : cube 1 ≃ interval :=
!prod_comm_equiv ⬝e !prod_unit_equiv
definition prod_square {A B : Type} {a a' : A} {b b' : B} (p : a = a') (q : b = b')
: square (pair_eq p idp) (pair_eq p idp) (pair_eq idp q) (pair_eq idp q) :=
by cases p; cases q; exact ids
namespace square
definition tl : square := (star, zero, zero)
definition tr : square := (star, one, zero)
definition bl : square := (star, zero, one )
definition br : square := (star, one, one )
-- s stands for "square" in the following definitions
definition st : tl = tr := pair_eq (pair_eq idp seg) idp
definition sb : bl = br := pair_eq (pair_eq idp seg) idp
definition sl : tl = bl := pair_eq idp seg
definition sr : tr = br := pair_eq idp seg
definition sfill : square st sb sl sr := !prod_square
definition fill : st ⬝ sr = sl ⬝ sb := !square_equiv_eq sfill
end square
|
2b1bb42f79c60fee2ae2f1026c220c0e27907331 | 22e97a5d648fc451e25a06c668dc03ac7ed7bc25 | /src/analysis/normed_space/real_inner_product.lean | 875e8e789e1cf535b09ef9e5ccc3699ff27e43c9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | keeferrowan/mathlib | f2818da875dbc7780830d09bd4c526b0764a4e50 | aad2dfc40e8e6a7e258287a7c1580318e865817e | refs/heads/master | 1,661,736,426,952 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 266,892,663 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,445,835,000 | 1,590,445,835,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,029 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import algebra.quadratic_discriminant
import analysis.special_functions.pow
import tactic.monotonicity
/-!
# Inner Product Space
This file defines real inner product space and proves its basic properties.
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. It generalizes the notion of
dot product in `ℝ^n` and provides the means of defining the length of a vector and the angle between
two vectors. In particular vectors `x` and `y` are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero.
## Main statements
Existence of orthogonal projection onto nonempty complete subspace:
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a unique `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
The point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
## Implementation notes
We decide to develop the theory of real inner product spaces and that of complex inner product
spaces separately.
## Tags
inner product space, norm, orthogonal projection
## References
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable theory
open real set
open_locale topological_space
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {F : Type v} {G : Type w}
class has_inner (α : Type*) := (inner : α → α → ℝ)
export has_inner (inner)
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
-- see Note[vector space definition] for why we extend `module`.
/--
An inner product space is a real vector space with an additional operation called inner product.
Inner product spaces over complex vector space will be defined in another file.
-/
class inner_product_space (α : Type*) extends add_comm_group α, module ℝ α, has_inner α :=
(comm : ∀ x y, inner x y = inner y x)
(nonneg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ inner x x)
(definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0)
(add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z)
(smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = r * inner x y)
end prio
variables [inner_product_space α]
section basic_properties
lemma inner_comm (x y : α) : inner x y = inner y x := inner_product_space.comm x y
lemma inner_self_nonneg {x : α} : 0 ≤ inner x x := inner_product_space.nonneg _
lemma inner_add_left {x y z : α} : inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z :=
inner_product_space.add_left _ _ _
lemma inner_add_right {x y z : α} : inner x (y + z) = inner x y + inner x z :=
by { rw [inner_comm, inner_add_left], simp [inner_comm] }
lemma inner_smul_left {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : inner (r • x) y = r * inner x y :=
inner_product_space.smul_left _ _ _
lemma inner_smul_right {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : inner x (r • y) = r * inner x y :=
by { rw [inner_comm, inner_smul_left, inner_comm] }
@[simp] lemma inner_zero_left {x : α} : inner 0 x = 0 :=
by { rw [← zero_smul ℝ (0:α), inner_smul_left, zero_mul] }
@[simp] lemma inner_zero_right {x : α} : inner x 0 = 0 :=
by { rw [inner_comm, inner_zero_left] }
lemma inner_self_eq_zero (x : α) : inner x x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
iff.intro (inner_product_space.definite _) (by { rintro rfl, exact inner_zero_left })
@[simp] lemma inner_neg_left {x y : α} : inner (-x) y = -inner x y :=
by { rw [← neg_one_smul ℝ x, inner_smul_left], simp }
@[simp] lemma inner_neg_right {x y : α} : inner x (-y) = -inner x y :=
by { rw [inner_comm, inner_neg_left, inner_comm] }
@[simp] lemma inner_neg_neg {x y : α} : inner (-x) (-y) = inner x y := by simp
lemma inner_sub_left {x y z : α} : inner (x - y) z = inner x z - inner y z :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left] }
lemma inner_sub_right {x y z : α} : inner x (y - z) = inner x y - inner x z :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right] }
/-- Expand `inner (x + y) (x + y)` -/
lemma inner_add_add_self {x y : α} : inner (x + y) (x + y) = inner x x + 2 * inner x y + inner y y :=
by simpa [inner_add_left, inner_add_right, two_mul, add_assoc] using inner_comm _ _
/-- Expand `inner (x - y) (x - y)` -/
lemma inner_sub_sub_self {x y : α} : inner (x - y) (x - y) = inner x x - 2 * inner x y + inner y y :=
begin
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, two_mul],
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm] using inner_comm _ _
end
/-- Parallelogram law -/
lemma parallelogram_law {x y : α} :
inner (x + y) (x + y) + inner (x - y) (x - y) = 2 * (inner x x + inner y y) :=
by simp [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self, two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality -/
lemma inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : α) : inner x y * inner x y ≤ inner x x * inner y y :=
begin
have : ∀ t, 0 ≤ inner y y * t * t + 2 * inner x y * t + inner x x, from
assume t, calc
0 ≤ inner (x+t•y) (x+t•y) : inner_self_nonneg
... = inner y y * t * t + 2 * inner x y * t + inner x x :
by { simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_smul_right, inner_smul_left], ring },
have := discriminant_le_zero this, rw discrim at this,
have h : (2 * inner x y)^2 - 4 * inner y y * inner x x =
4 * (inner x y * inner x y - inner x x * inner y y) := by ring,
rw h at this,
linarith
end
end basic_properties
section norm
/-- An inner product naturally induces a norm. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance inner_product_space_has_norm : has_norm α := ⟨λx, sqrt (inner x x)⟩
lemma norm_eq_sqrt_inner {x : α} : ∥x∥ = sqrt (inner x x) := rfl
lemma inner_self_eq_norm_square (x : α) : inner x x = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ := (mul_self_sqrt inner_self_nonneg).symm
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_pow_two {x y : α} : ∥x + y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 + 2 * inner x y + ∥y∥^2 :=
by { repeat {rw [pow_two, ← inner_self_eq_norm_square]}, exact inner_add_add_self }
/-- Same lemma as above but in a different form -/
lemma norm_add_mul_self {x y : α} : ∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + 2 * inner x y + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { repeat {rw [← pow_two]}, exact norm_add_pow_two }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_pow_two {x y : α} : ∥x - y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 - 2 * inner x y + ∥y∥^2 :=
by { repeat {rw [pow_two, ← inner_self_eq_norm_square]}, exact inner_sub_sub_self }
/-- Same lemma as above but in a different form -/
lemma norm_sub_mul_self {x y : α} : ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - 2 * inner x y + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { repeat {rw [← pow_two]}, exact norm_sub_pow_two }
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma abs_inner_le_norm (x y : α) : abs (inner x y) ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le (mul_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _))
begin
rw abs_mul_abs_self,
have : ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ * (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = inner x x * inner y y,
simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_square], ring,
rw this,
exact inner_mul_inner_self_le _ _
end
lemma parallelogram_law_with_norm {x y : α} :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ + ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = 2 * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) :=
by { simp only [(inner_self_eq_norm_square _).symm], exact parallelogram_law }
/-- An inner product space forms a normed group w.r.t. its associated norm. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance inner_product_space_is_normed_group : normed_group α :=
normed_group.of_core α
{ norm_eq_zero_iff := assume x, iff.intro
(λ h : sqrt (inner x x) = 0, (inner_self_eq_zero x).1 $ (sqrt_eq_zero inner_self_nonneg).1 h )
(by {rintro rfl, show sqrt (inner (0:α) 0) = 0, simp }),
triangle := assume x y,
begin
have := calc
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = inner (x + y) (x + y) : (inner_self_eq_norm_square _).symm
... = inner x x + 2 * inner x y + inner y y : inner_add_add_self
... ≤ inner x x + 2 * (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) + inner y y :
by linarith [abs_inner_le_norm x y, le_abs_self (inner x y)]
... = (∥x∥ + ∥y∥) * (∥x∥ + ∥y∥) : by { simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_square], ring },
exact nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le (add_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) this
end,
norm_neg := λx, show sqrt (inner (-x) (-x)) = sqrt (inner x x), by simp }
/-- An inner product space forms a normed space over reals w.r.t. its associated norm. -/
instance inner_product_space_is_normed_space : normed_space ℝ α :=
{ norm_smul_le := assume r x, le_of_eq $
begin
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_square],
exact calc
abs(r) * ∥x∥ * (abs(r) * ∥x∥) = (abs(r) * abs(r)) * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥) : by ring
... = r * (r * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥)) : by { rw abs_mul_abs_self, ring },
exact inner_self_nonneg,
exact mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)
end }
end norm
section orthogonal
open filter
/--
Existence of minimizers
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a unique `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
-/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
theorem exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex {K : set α} (ne : K.nonempty) (h₁ : is_complete K)
(h₂ : convex K) : ∀ u : α, ∃ v ∈ K, ∥u - v∥ = ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥ := assume u,
begin
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥,
letI : nonempty K := ne.to_subtype,
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_cinfi (λ _, norm_nonneg _),
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥,
from cinfi_le ⟨0, forall_range_iff.2 $ λ _, norm_nonneg _⟩,
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥ := assume w hw, δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩,
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `∥u - w n∥ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `∥u - w n∥ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ∥u - w n∥ < δ + 1 / (n + 1),
{ have hδ : ∀n:ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1), from
λ n, lt_add_of_le_of_pos (le_refl _) nat.one_div_pos_of_nat,
have h := λ n, exists_lt_of_cinfi_lt (hδ n),
let w : ℕ → K := λ n, classical.some (h n),
exact ⟨w, λ n, classical.some_spec (h n)⟩ },
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩,
have norm_tendsto : tendsto (λ n, ∥u - w n∥) at_top (𝓝 δ),
{ have h : tendsto (λ n:ℕ, δ) at_top (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds,
have h' : tendsto (λ n:ℕ, δ + 1 / (n + 1)) at_top (𝓝 δ),
{ convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat, simp only [add_zero] },
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h'
(λ x, δ_le _) (λ x, le_of_lt (hw _)) },
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : cauchy_seq (λ n, ((w n):α)),
{ rw cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0, -- splits into three goals
let b := λ n:ℕ, (8 * δ * (1/(n+1)) + 4 * (1/(n+1)) * (1/(n+1))),
use (λn, sqrt (b n)),
split,
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ sqrt (b n)`
assume n, exact sqrt_nonneg _,
split,
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ sqrt (b N)`
assume p q N hp hq,
let wp := ((w p):α), let wq := ((w q):α),
let a := u - wq, let b := u - wp,
let half := 1 / (2:ℝ), let div := 1 / ((N:ℝ) + 1),
have : 4 * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ + ∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥ =
2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) :=
calc
4 * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥ + ∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥
= (2*∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) * (2 * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) + ∥wp-wq∥*∥wp-wq∥ : by ring
... = (abs((2:ℝ)) * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) * (abs((2:ℝ)) * ∥u - half•(wq+wp)∥) + ∥wp-wq∥*∥wp-wq∥ :
by { rw abs_of_nonneg, exact add_nonneg zero_le_one zero_le_one }
... = ∥(2:ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))∥ * ∥(2:ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))∥ + ∥wp-wq∥ * ∥wp-wq∥ :
by { rw [norm_smul], refl }
... = ∥a + b∥ * ∥a + b∥ + ∥a - b∥ * ∥a - b∥ :
begin
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0),
← one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul],
simp only [one_smul],
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b, show wp - wq = (u - wq) - (u - wp), abel,
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b, show u + u - (wq + wp) = (u - wq) + (u - wp), abel,
rw [eq₁, eq₂],
end
... = 2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) : parallelogram_law_with_norm,
have eq : δ ≤ ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥,
{ rw smul_add,
apply δ_le', apply h₂,
repeat {exact subtype.mem _},
repeat {exact le_of_lt one_half_pos},
exact add_halves 1 },
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥,
{ mono, mono, norm_num, apply mul_nonneg, norm_num, exact norm_nonneg _ },
have eq₂ : ∥a∥ * ∥a∥ ≤ (δ + div) * (δ + div) :=
mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
(le_trans (le_of_lt $ hw q) (add_le_add_left (nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)),
have eq₂' : ∥b∥ * ∥b∥ ≤ (δ + div) * (δ + div) :=
mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
(le_trans (le_of_lt $ hw p) (add_le_add_left (nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)),
rw dist_eq_norm,
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le, { exact sqrt_nonneg _ },
rw mul_self_sqrt,
exact calc
∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥ = 2 * (∥a∥*∥a∥ + ∥b∥*∥b∥) - 4 * ∥u - half • (wq+wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq+wp)∥ :
by { rw ← this, simp }
... ≤ 2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) - 4 * δ * δ : sub_le_sub_left eq₁ _
... ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ :
sub_le_sub_right (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (add_le_add eq₂ eq₂') (by norm_num)) _
... = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div : by ring,
exact add_nonneg (mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) zero_le_δ) (le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat))
(mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) (le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat)) (le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat)),
-- third goal : `tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), sqrt (b n)) at_top (𝓝 0)`
apply tendsto.comp,
{ convert continuous_sqrt.continuous_at, exact sqrt_zero.symm },
have eq₁ : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (𝓝 (0:ℝ)),
{ convert (@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ (8 * δ) _).mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), (4:ℝ) * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (𝓝 (0:ℝ)),
{ convert (@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ (4:ℝ) _).mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
have eq₂ : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), (4:ℝ) * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (𝓝 (0:ℝ)),
{ convert this.mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
convert eq₁.add eq₂, simp only [add_zero] },
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_is_complete h₁ (λ n, _) seq_is_cauchy with ⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩,
use v, use hv,
have h_cont : continuous (λ v, ∥u - v∥) :=
continuous.comp continuous_norm (continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id),
have : tendsto (λ n, ∥u - w n∥) at_top (𝓝 ∥u - v∥),
convert (tendsto.comp h_cont.continuous_at w_tendsto),
exact tendsto_nhds_unique at_top_ne_bot this norm_tendsto,
exact subtype.mem _
end
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the above theorem -/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_le_zero {K : set α} (h : convex K) {u : α} {v : α}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, inner (u - v) (w - v) ≤ 0 :=
iff.intro
begin
assume eq w hw,
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥, let p := inner (u - v) (w - v), let q := ∥w - v∥^2,
letI : nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩,
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ,
apply le_cinfi, intro, exact norm_nonneg _,
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥,
assume w, apply cinfi_le, use (0:ℝ), rintros _ ⟨_, rfl⟩, exact norm_nonneg _,
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥ := assume w hw, δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩,
have : ∀θ:ℝ, 0 < θ → θ ≤ 1 → 2 * p ≤ θ * q,
assume θ hθ₁ hθ₂,
have : ∥u - v∥^2 ≤ ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ*θ*∥w - v∥^2 :=
calc
∥u - v∥^2 ≤ ∥u - (θ•w + (1-θ)•v)∥^2 :
begin
simp only [pow_two], apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _),
rw [eq], apply δ_le',
apply h hw hv,
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel'_right _ _],
end
... = ∥(u - v) - θ • (w - v)∥^2 :
begin
have : u - (θ•w + (1-θ)•v) = (u - v) - θ • (w - v),
{ rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul],
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev] },
rw this
end
... = ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ*θ*∥w - v∥^2 :
begin
rw [norm_sub_pow_two, inner_smul_right, norm_smul],
simp only [pow_two],
show ∥u-v∥*∥u-v∥-2*(θ*inner(u-v)(w-v))+abs(θ)*∥w-v∥*(abs(θ)*∥w-v∥)=
∥u-v∥*∥u-v∥-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)+θ*θ*(∥w-v∥*∥w-v∥),
rw abs_of_pos hθ₁, ring
end,
have eq₁ : ∥u-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)+θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2=∥u-v∥^2+(θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)), abel,
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this,
have eq₂ : θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)=θ*(θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*inner(u-v)(w-v)), ring,
rw eq₂ at this,
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left this hθ₁),
exact this,
by_cases hq : q = 0,
{ rw hq at this,
have : p ≤ 0,
have := this (1:ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num),
linarith,
exact this },
{ have q_pos : 0 < q,
apply lt_of_le_of_ne, exact pow_two_nonneg _, intro h, exact hq h.symm,
by_contradiction hp, rw not_le at hp,
let θ := min (1:ℝ) (p / q),
have eq₁ : θ*q ≤ p := calc
θ*q ≤ (p/q) * q : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (pow_two_nonneg _)
... = p : div_mul_cancel _ hq,
have : 2 * p ≤ p := calc
2 * p ≤ θ*q : by { refine this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num) }
... ≤ p : eq₁,
linarith }
end
begin
assume h,
letI : nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩,
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply le_cinfi, assume w,
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le (norm_nonneg _),
have := h w w.2,
exact calc
∥u - v∥ * ∥u - v∥ ≤ ∥u - v∥ * ∥u - v∥ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w:α) - v) : by linarith
... ≤ ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w:α) - v) + ∥(w:α) - v∥^2 :
by { rw pow_two, refine le_add_of_nonneg_right _, exact pow_two_nonneg _ }
... = ∥(u - v) - (w - v)∥^2 : norm_sub_pow_two.symm
... = ∥u - w∥ * ∥u - w∥ :
by { have : (u - v) - (w - v) = u - w, abel, rw [this, pow_two] } },
{ show (⨅ (w : K), ∥u - w∥) ≤ (λw:K, ∥u - w∥) ⟨v, hv⟩,
apply cinfi_le, use 0, rintros y ⟨z, rfl⟩, exact norm_nonneg _ }
end
/--
Existence of minimizers.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a unique `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace (K : subspace ℝ α)
(h : is_complete (↑K : set α)) : ∀ u : α, ∃ v ∈ K, ∥u - v∥ = ⨅ w : (↑K : set α), ∥u - w∥ :=
exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K.zero⟩ h K.convex
/--
Characterization of minimizers in the above theorem.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `inner (u - v) w = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero (K : subspace ℝ α) {u : α} {v : α}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : (↑K : set α), ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, inner (u - v) w = 0 :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h,
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, inner (u - v) (w - v) ≤ 0,
{ rwa [norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_le_zero] at h, exacts [K.convex, hv] },
assume w hw,
have le : inner (u - v) w ≤ 0,
let w' := w + v,
have : w' ∈ K := submodule.add_mem _ hw hv,
have h₁ := h w' this,
have h₂ : w' - v = w, simp only [add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg],
rw h₂ at h₁, exact h₁,
have ge : inner (u - v) w ≥ 0,
let w'' := -w + v,
have : w'' ∈ K := submodule.add_mem _ (submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv,
have h₁ := h w'' this,
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w, simp only [neg_inj', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg],
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁,
linarith,
exact le_antisymm le ge
end
begin
assume h,
have : ∀ w ∈ K, inner (u - v) (w - v) ≤ 0,
assume w hw,
let w' := w - v,
have : w' ∈ K := submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv,
have h₁ := h w' this,
exact le_of_eq h₁,
rwa norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_le_zero,
exacts [submodule.convex _, hv]
end
end orthogonal
|
22923a25d6de53403f9c5b71838435009eeda7bc | fa01e273a2a9f22530e6adb1ed7d4f54bb15c8d7 | /src/N2O/Data/Bytes.lean | 8b3f6385e4d3d8648a6fa4b675395d48d0cbc719 | [
"LicenseRef-scancode-mit-taylor-variant",
"LicenseRef-scancode-warranty-disclaimer"
] | permissive | o89/n2o | 4c99afb11fff0a1e3dae6b3bc8a3b7fc42c314ac | 58c1fbf4ef892ed86bdc6b78ec9ca5a403715c2d | refs/heads/master | 1,670,314,676,229 | 1,669,086,375,000 | 1,669,086,375,000 | 200,506,953 | 16 | 6 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 816 | lean | def UInt16.nthByte (x : UInt16) (n : Nat) : UInt8 :=
(UInt16.land (x.shiftRight $ 8 * UInt16.ofNat n) 255).toUInt8
def UInt32.nthByte (x : UInt32) (n : Nat) : UInt8 :=
(UInt32.land (x.shiftRight $ 8 * UInt32.ofNat n) 255).toUInt8
def iotaZero : Nat → List Nat
| 0 => [0]
| n + 1 => (n + 1) :: iotaZero n
def UInt16.toBytes (x : UInt16) : ByteArray :=
List.toByteArray (List.map (UInt16.nthByte x) (iotaZero 1))
def UInt32.toBytes (x : UInt32) : ByteArray :=
List.toByteArray (List.map (UInt32.nthByte x) (iotaZero 3))
def UInt8.shiftl16 (x : UInt8) (y : UInt16) : UInt16 :=
UInt16.shiftRight x.toUInt16 y
def UInt8.shiftl32 (x : UInt8) (y : UInt32) : UInt32 :=
UInt32.shiftRight x.toUInt32 y
def String.bytes (x : String) : ByteArray :=
List.toByteArray (List.map (UInt8.ofNat ∘ Char.toNat) x.toList)
|
2a5ac1581b39c94c641579c96065a8956406bda9 | 302c785c90d40ad3d6be43d33bc6a558354cc2cf | /src/data/qpf/multivariate/constructions/fix.lean | c4042efdb0ddfcc2e08984be1040caf65e30f47d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ilitzroth/mathlib | ea647e67f1fdfd19a0f7bdc5504e8acec6180011 | 5254ef14e3465f6504306132fe3ba9cec9ffff16 | refs/heads/master | 1,680,086,661,182 | 1,617,715,647,000 | 1,617,715,647,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,880 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import data.pfunctor.multivariate.W
import data.qpf.multivariate.basic
universes u v
/-!
# The initial algebra of a multivariate qpf is again a qpf.
For a `(n+1)`-ary QPF `F (α₀,..,αₙ)`, we take the least fixed point of `F` with
regards to its last argument `αₙ`. The result is a `n`-ary functor: `fix F (α₀,..,αₙ₋₁)`.
Making `fix F` into a functor allows us to take the fixed point, compose with other functors
and take a fixed point again.
## Main definitions
* `fix.mk` - constructor
* `fix.dest - destructor
* `fix.rec` - recursor: basis for defining functions by structural recursion on `fix F α`
* `fix.drec` - dependent recursor: generalization of `fix.rec` where
the result type of the function is allowed to depend on the `fix F α` value
* `fix.rec_eq` - defining equation for `recursor`
* `fix.ind` - induction principle for `fix F α`
## Implementation notes
For `F` a QPF`, we define `fix F α` in terms of the W-type of the polynomial functor `P` of `F`.
We define the relation `Wequiv` and take its quotient as the definition of `fix F α`.
```lean
inductive Wequiv {α : typevec n} : q.P.W α → q.P.W α → Prop
| ind (a : q.P.A) (f' : q.P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f₀ f₁ : q.P.last.B a → q.P.W α) :
(∀ x, Wequiv (f₀ x) (f₁ x)) → Wequiv (q.P.W_mk a f' f₀) (q.P.W_mk a f' f₁)
| abs (a₀ : q.P.A) (f'₀ : q.P.drop.B a₀ ⟹ α) (f₀ : q.P.last.B a₀ → q.P.W α)
(a₁ : q.P.A) (f'₁ : q.P.drop.B a₁ ⟹ α) (f₁ : q.P.last.B a₁ → q.P.W α) :
abs ⟨a₀, q.P.append_contents f'₀ f₀⟩ = abs ⟨a₁, q.P.append_contents f'₁ f₁⟩ →
Wequiv (q.P.W_mk a₀ f'₀ f₀) (q.P.W_mk a₁ f'₁ f₁)
| trans (u v w : q.P.W α) : Wequiv u v → Wequiv v w → Wequiv u w
```
See [avigad-carneiro-hudon2019] for more details.
## Reference
* [Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon, *Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
namespace mvqpf
open typevec
open mvfunctor (liftp liftr)
open_locale mvfunctor
variables {n : ℕ} {F : typevec.{u} (n+1) → Type u} [mvfunctor F] [q : mvqpf F]
include q
/-- `recF` is used as a basis for defining the recursor on `fix F α`. `recF`
traverses recursively the W-type generated by `q.P` using a function on `F`
as a recursive step -/
def recF {α : typevec n} {β : Type*} (g : F (α.append1 β) → β) : q.P.W α → β :=
q.P.W_rec (λ a f' f rec, g (abs ⟨a, split_fun f' rec⟩))
theorem recF_eq {α : typevec n} {β : Type*} (g : F (α.append1 β) → β)
(a : q.P.A) (f' : q.P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : q.P.last.B a → q.P.W α) :
recF g (q.P.W_mk a f' f) = g (abs ⟨a, split_fun f' (recF g ∘ f)⟩) :=
by rw [recF, mvpfunctor.W_rec_eq]; refl
theorem recF_eq' {α : typevec n} {β : Type*} (g : F (α.append1 β) → β)
(x : q.P.W α) :
recF g x = g (abs ((append_fun id (recF g)) <$$> q.P.W_dest' x)) :=
begin
apply q.P.W_cases _ x,
intros a f' f,
rw [recF_eq, q.P.W_dest'_W_mk, mvpfunctor.map_eq, append_fun_comp_split_fun,
typevec.id_comp]
end
/-- Equivalence relation on W-types that represent the same `fix F`
value -/
inductive Wequiv {α : typevec n} : q.P.W α → q.P.W α → Prop
| ind (a : q.P.A) (f' : q.P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f₀ f₁ : q.P.last.B a → q.P.W α) :
(∀ x, Wequiv (f₀ x) (f₁ x)) → Wequiv (q.P.W_mk a f' f₀) (q.P.W_mk a f' f₁)
| abs (a₀ : q.P.A) (f'₀ : q.P.drop.B a₀ ⟹ α) (f₀ : q.P.last.B a₀ → q.P.W α)
(a₁ : q.P.A) (f'₁ : q.P.drop.B a₁ ⟹ α) (f₁ : q.P.last.B a₁ → q.P.W α) :
abs ⟨a₀, q.P.append_contents f'₀ f₀⟩ = abs ⟨a₁, q.P.append_contents f'₁ f₁⟩ →
Wequiv (q.P.W_mk a₀ f'₀ f₀) (q.P.W_mk a₁ f'₁ f₁)
| trans (u v w : q.P.W α) : Wequiv u v → Wequiv v w → Wequiv u w
theorem recF_eq_of_Wequiv (α : typevec n) {β : Type*} (u : F (α.append1 β) → β)
(x y : q.P.W α) :
Wequiv x y → recF u x = recF u y :=
begin
apply q.P.W_cases _ x,
intros a₀ f'₀ f₀,
apply q.P.W_cases _ y,
intros a₁ f'₁ f₁,
intro h, induction h,
case mvqpf.Wequiv.ind : a f' f₀ f₁ h ih { simp only [recF_eq, function.comp, ih] },
case mvqpf.Wequiv.abs : a₀ f'₀ f₀ a₁ f'₁ f₁ h
{ simp only [recF_eq', abs_map, mvpfunctor.W_dest'_W_mk, h] },
case mvqpf.Wequiv.trans : x y z e₁ e₂ ih₁ ih₂
{ exact eq.trans ih₁ ih₂ }
end
theorem Wequiv.abs' {α : typevec n} (x y : q.P.W α)
(h : abs (q.P.W_dest' x) = abs (q.P.W_dest' y)) :
Wequiv x y :=
begin
revert h,
apply q.P.W_cases _ x,
intros a₀ f'₀ f₀,
apply q.P.W_cases _ y,
intros a₁ f'₁ f₁,
apply Wequiv.abs
end
theorem Wequiv.refl {α : typevec n} (x : q.P.W α) : Wequiv x x :=
by apply q.P.W_cases _ x; intros a f' f; exact Wequiv.abs a f' f a f' f rfl
theorem Wequiv.symm {α : typevec n} (x y : q.P.W α) : Wequiv x y → Wequiv y x :=
begin
intro h, induction h,
case mvqpf.Wequiv.ind : a f' f₀ f₁ h ih
{ exact Wequiv.ind _ _ _ _ ih },
case mvqpf.Wequiv.abs : a₀ f'₀ f₀ a₁ f'₁ f₁ h
{ exact Wequiv.abs _ _ _ _ _ _ h.symm },
case mvqpf.Wequiv.trans : x y z e₁ e₂ ih₁ ih₂
{ exact mvqpf.Wequiv.trans _ _ _ ih₂ ih₁}
end
/-- maps every element of the W type to a canonical representative -/
def Wrepr {α : typevec n} : q.P.W α → q.P.W α := recF (q.P.W_mk' ∘ repr)
theorem Wrepr_W_mk {α : typevec n}
(a : q.P.A) (f' : q.P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : q.P.last.B a → q.P.W α) :
Wrepr (q.P.W_mk a f' f) =
q.P.W_mk' (repr (abs ((append_fun id Wrepr) <$$> ⟨a, q.P.append_contents f' f⟩))) :=
by rw [Wrepr, recF_eq', q.P.W_dest'_W_mk]; refl
theorem Wrepr_equiv {α : typevec n} (x : q.P.W α) : Wequiv (Wrepr x) x :=
begin
apply q.P.W_ind _ x, intros a f' f ih,
apply Wequiv.trans _ (q.P.W_mk' ((append_fun id Wrepr) <$$> ⟨a, q.P.append_contents f' f⟩)),
{ apply Wequiv.abs',
rw [Wrepr_W_mk, q.P.W_dest'_W_mk', q.P.W_dest'_W_mk', abs_repr] },
rw [q.P.map_eq, mvpfunctor.W_mk', append_fun_comp_split_fun, id_comp],
apply Wequiv.ind, exact ih
end
theorem Wequiv_map {α β : typevec n} (g : α ⟹ β) (x y : q.P.W α) :
Wequiv x y → Wequiv (g <$$> x) (g <$$> y) :=
begin
intro h, induction h,
case mvqpf.Wequiv.ind : a f' f₀ f₁ h ih
{ rw [q.P.W_map_W_mk, q.P.W_map_W_mk], apply Wequiv.ind, apply ih },
case mvqpf.Wequiv.abs : a₀ f'₀ f₀ a₁ f'₁ f₁ h
{ rw [q.P.W_map_W_mk, q.P.W_map_W_mk], apply Wequiv.abs,
show abs (q.P.obj_append1 a₀ (g ⊚ f'₀) (λ x, q.P.W_map g (f₀ x))) =
abs (q.P.obj_append1 a₁ (g ⊚ f'₁) (λ x, q.P.W_map g (f₁ x))),
rw [←q.P.map_obj_append1, ←q.P.map_obj_append1, abs_map, abs_map, h] },
case mvqpf.Wequiv.trans : x y z e₁ e₂ ih₁ ih₂
{ apply mvqpf.Wequiv.trans, apply ih₁, apply ih₂ }
end
/--
Define the fixed point as the quotient of trees under the equivalence relation.
-/
def W_setoid (α : typevec n) : setoid (q.P.W α) :=
⟨Wequiv, @Wequiv.refl _ _ _ _ _, @Wequiv.symm _ _ _ _ _, @Wequiv.trans _ _ _ _ _⟩
local attribute [instance] W_setoid
/-- Least fixed point of functor F. The result is a functor with one fewer parameters
than the input. For `F a b c` a ternary functor, fix F is a binary functor such that
```lean
fix F a b = F a b (fix F a b)
```
-/
def fix {n : ℕ} (F : typevec (n+1) → Type*) [mvfunctor F] [q : mvqpf F] (α : typevec n) :=
quotient (W_setoid α : setoid (q.P.W α))
attribute [nolint has_inhabited_instance] fix
/-- `fix F` is a functor -/
def fix.map {α β : typevec n} (g : α ⟹ β) : fix F α → fix F β :=
quotient.lift (λ x : q.P.W α, ⟦q.P.W_map g x⟧)
(λ a b h, quot.sound (Wequiv_map _ _ _ h))
instance fix.mvfunctor : mvfunctor (fix F) :=
{ map := @fix.map _ _ _ _}
variable {α : typevec.{u} n}
/-- Recursor for `fix F` -/
def fix.rec {β : Type u} (g : F (α ::: β) → β) : fix F α → β :=
quot.lift (recF g) (recF_eq_of_Wequiv α g)
/-- Access W-type underlying `fix F` -/
def fix_to_W : fix F α → q.P.W α :=
quotient.lift Wrepr (recF_eq_of_Wequiv α (λ x, q.P.W_mk' (repr x)))
/-- Constructor for `fix F` -/
def fix.mk (x : F (append1 α (fix F α))) : fix F α :=
quot.mk _ (q.P.W_mk' (append_fun id fix_to_W <$$> repr x))
/-- Destructor for `fix F` -/
def fix.dest : fix F α → F (append1 α (fix F α)) :=
fix.rec (mvfunctor.map (append_fun id fix.mk))
theorem fix.rec_eq {β : Type u} (g : F (append1 α β) → β) (x : F (append1 α (fix F α))) :
fix.rec g (fix.mk x) = g (append_fun id (fix.rec g) <$$> x) :=
have recF g ∘ fix_to_W = fix.rec g,
by { apply funext, apply quotient.ind, intro x, apply recF_eq_of_Wequiv,
apply Wrepr_equiv },
begin
conv { to_lhs, rw [fix.rec, fix.mk], dsimp },
cases h : repr x with a f,
rw [mvpfunctor.map_eq, recF_eq', ←mvpfunctor.map_eq, mvpfunctor.W_dest'_W_mk'],
rw [←mvpfunctor.comp_map, abs_map, ←h, abs_repr, ←append_fun_comp, id_comp, this]
end
theorem fix.ind_aux (a : q.P.A) (f' : q.P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : q.P.last.B a → q.P.W α) :
fix.mk (abs ⟨a, q.P.append_contents f' (λ x, ⟦f x⟧)⟩) = ⟦q.P.W_mk a f' f⟧ :=
have fix.mk (abs ⟨a, q.P.append_contents f' (λ x, ⟦f x⟧)⟩) = ⟦Wrepr (q.P.W_mk a f' f)⟧,
begin
apply quot.sound, apply Wequiv.abs',
rw [mvpfunctor.W_dest'_W_mk', abs_map, abs_repr, ←abs_map, mvpfunctor.map_eq],
conv { to_rhs, rw [Wrepr_W_mk, q.P.W_dest'_W_mk', abs_repr, mvpfunctor.map_eq] },
congr' 2, rw [mvpfunctor.append_contents, mvpfunctor.append_contents],
rw [append_fun, append_fun, ←split_fun_comp, ←split_fun_comp],
reflexivity
end,
by { rw this, apply quot.sound, apply Wrepr_equiv }
theorem fix.ind_rec {β : Type*} (g₁ g₂ : fix F α → β)
(h : ∀ x : F (append1 α (fix F α)),
(append_fun id g₁) <$$> x = (append_fun id g₂) <$$> x → g₁ (fix.mk x) = g₂ (fix.mk x)) :
∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x :=
begin
apply quot.ind,
intro x,
apply q.P.W_ind _ x, intros a f' f ih,
show g₁ ⟦q.P.W_mk a f' f⟧ = g₂ ⟦q.P.W_mk a f' f⟧,
rw [←fix.ind_aux a f' f], apply h,
rw [←abs_map, ←abs_map, mvpfunctor.map_eq, mvpfunctor.map_eq],
congr' 2,
rw [mvpfunctor.append_contents, append_fun, append_fun, ←split_fun_comp, ←split_fun_comp],
have : g₁ ∘ (λ x, ⟦f x⟧) = g₂ ∘ (λ x, ⟦f x⟧),
{ ext x, exact ih x },
rw this
end
theorem fix.rec_unique {β : Type*} (g : F (append1 α β) → β) (h : fix F α → β)
(hyp : ∀ x, h (fix.mk x) = g (append_fun id h <$$> x)) :
fix.rec g = h :=
begin
ext x,
apply fix.ind_rec,
intros x hyp',
rw [hyp, ←hyp', fix.rec_eq]
end
theorem fix.mk_dest (x : fix F α) : fix.mk (fix.dest x) = x :=
begin
change (fix.mk ∘ fix.dest) x = x,
apply fix.ind_rec,
intro x, dsimp,
rw [fix.dest, fix.rec_eq, ←comp_map, ←append_fun_comp, id_comp],
intro h, rw h,
show fix.mk (append_fun id id <$$> x) = fix.mk x,
rw [append_fun_id_id, mvfunctor.id_map]
end
theorem fix.dest_mk (x : F (append1 α (fix F α))) : fix.dest (fix.mk x) = x :=
begin
unfold fix.dest, rw [fix.rec_eq, ←fix.dest, ←comp_map],
conv { to_rhs, rw ←(mvfunctor.id_map x) },
rw [←append_fun_comp, id_comp],
have : fix.mk ∘ fix.dest = id, {ext x, apply fix.mk_dest },
rw [this, append_fun_id_id]
end
theorem fix.ind {α : typevec n} (p : fix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x : F (α.append1 (fix F α)), liftp (pred_last α p) x → p (fix.mk x)) :
∀ x, p x :=
begin
apply quot.ind,
intro x,
apply q.P.W_ind _ x, intros a f' f ih,
change p ⟦q.P.W_mk a f' f⟧,
rw [←fix.ind_aux a f' f],
apply h,
rw mvqpf.liftp_iff,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, _⟩,
intros i j,
cases i,
{ apply ih },
{ triv },
end
instance mvqpf_fix : mvqpf (fix F) :=
{ P := q.P.Wp,
abs := λ α, quot.mk Wequiv,
repr := λ α, fix_to_W,
abs_repr := by { intros α, apply quot.ind, intro a, apply quot.sound, apply Wrepr_equiv },
abs_map :=
begin
intros α β g x, conv { to_rhs, dsimp [mvfunctor.map]},
rw fix.map, apply quot.sound,
apply Wequiv.refl
end }
/-- Dependent recursor for `fix F` -/
def fix.drec {β : fix F α → Type u}
(g : Π x : F (α ::: sigma β), β (fix.mk $ (id ::: sigma.fst) <$$> x)) (x : fix F α) : β x :=
let y := @fix.rec _ F _ _ α (sigma β) (λ i, ⟨_,g i⟩) x in
have x = y.1,
by { symmetry, dsimp [y], apply fix.ind_rec _ id _ x, intros x' ih,
rw fix.rec_eq, dsimp, simp [append_fun_id_id] at ih,
congr, conv { to_rhs, rw [← ih] }, rw [mvfunctor.map_map,← append_fun_comp,id_comp], },
cast (by rw this) y.2
end mvqpf
|
111fda742b0233eec0c324d2a64e1d9ff89c4e6e | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/algebra/polynomial/group_ring_action.lean | b1d42107295c785d763d5fcf73b822222c425103 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,318 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import data.polynomial.monic
import data.polynomial.algebra_map
import algebra.group_ring_action
import algebra.group_action_hom
/-!
# Group action on rings applied to polynomials
This file contains instances and definitions relating `mul_semiring_action` to `polynomial`.
-/
variables (M : Type*) [monoid M]
namespace polynomial
variables (R : Type*) [semiring R]
variables {M}
lemma smul_eq_map [mul_semiring_action M R] (m : M) :
((•) m) = map (mul_semiring_action.to_ring_hom M R m) :=
begin
suffices :
distrib_mul_action.to_add_monoid_hom M (polynomial R) m =
(map_ring_hom (mul_semiring_action.to_ring_hom M R m)).to_add_monoid_hom,
{ ext1 r, exact add_monoid_hom.congr_fun this r, },
ext n r : 2,
change m • monomial n r = map (mul_semiring_action.to_ring_hom M R m) (monomial n r),
simpa only [polynomial.map_monomial, polynomial.smul_monomial],
end
variables (M)
noncomputable instance [mul_semiring_action M R] : mul_semiring_action M (polynomial R) :=
{ smul := (•),
smul_one := λ m, (smul_eq_map R m).symm ▸ map_one (mul_semiring_action.to_ring_hom M R m),
smul_mul := λ m p q, (smul_eq_map R m).symm ▸ map_mul (mul_semiring_action.to_ring_hom M R m),
..polynomial.distrib_mul_action }
noncomputable instance [faithful_mul_semiring_action M R] :
faithful_mul_semiring_action M (polynomial R) :=
{ eq_of_smul_eq_smul' := λ m₁ m₂ h, eq_of_smul_eq_smul R $ λ s, C_inj.1 $
calc C (m₁ • s)
= m₁ • C s : (smul_C _ _).symm
... = m₂ • C s : h (C s)
... = C (m₂ • s) : smul_C _ _,
.. polynomial.mul_semiring_action M R }
variables {M R}
variables [mul_semiring_action M R]
@[simp] lemma smul_X (m : M) : (m • X : polynomial R) = X :=
(smul_eq_map R m).symm ▸ map_X _
variables (S : Type*) [comm_semiring S] [mul_semiring_action M S]
theorem smul_eval_smul (m : M) (f : polynomial S) (x : S) :
(m • f).eval (m • x) = m • f.eval x :=
polynomial.induction_on f
(λ r, by rw [smul_C, eval_C, eval_C])
(λ f g ihf ihg, by rw [smul_add, eval_add, ihf, ihg, eval_add, smul_add])
(λ n r ih, by rw [smul_mul', smul_pow, smul_C, smul_X, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_pow, eval_X,
eval_mul, eval_C, eval_pow, eval_X, smul_mul', smul_pow])
variables (G : Type*) [group G]
theorem eval_smul' [mul_semiring_action G S] (g : G) (f : polynomial S) (x : S) :
f.eval (g • x) = g • (g⁻¹ • f).eval x :=
by rw [← smul_eval_smul, smul_inv_smul]
theorem smul_eval [mul_semiring_action G S] (g : G) (f : polynomial S) (x : S) :
(g • f).eval x = g • f.eval (g⁻¹ • x) :=
by rw [← smul_eval_smul, smul_inv_smul]
end polynomial
section comm_ring
variables (G : Type*) [group G] [fintype G]
variables (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] [mul_semiring_action G R]
open mul_action
open_locale classical
/-- the product of `(X - g • x)` over distinct `g • x`. -/
noncomputable def prod_X_sub_smul (x : R) : polynomial R :=
(finset.univ : finset (quotient_group.quotient $ mul_action.stabilizer G x)).prod $
λ g, polynomial.X - polynomial.C (of_quotient_stabilizer G x g)
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.monic (x : R) : (prod_X_sub_smul G R x).monic :=
polynomial.monic_prod_of_monic _ _ $ λ g _, polynomial.monic_X_sub_C _
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.eval (x : R) : (prod_X_sub_smul G R x).eval x = 0 :=
(monoid_hom.map_prod
((polynomial.aeval x).to_ring_hom.to_monoid_hom : polynomial R →* R) _ _).trans $
finset.prod_eq_zero (finset.mem_univ $ quotient_group.mk 1) $
by simp
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.smul (x : R) (g : G) :
g • prod_X_sub_smul G R x = prod_X_sub_smul G R x :=
(smul_prod _ _ _ _ _).trans $ fintype.prod_bijective _ (mul_action.bijective g) _ _
(λ g', by rw [of_quotient_stabilizer_smul, smul_sub, polynomial.smul_X, polynomial.smul_C])
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.coeff (x : R) (g : G) (n : ℕ) :
g • (prod_X_sub_smul G R x).coeff n =
(prod_X_sub_smul G R x).coeff n :=
by rw [← polynomial.coeff_smul, prod_X_sub_smul.smul]
end comm_ring
namespace mul_semiring_action_hom
variables {M}
variables {P : Type*} [comm_semiring P] [mul_semiring_action M P]
variables {Q : Type*} [comm_semiring Q] [mul_semiring_action M Q]
open polynomial
/-- An equivariant map induces an equivariant map on polynomials. -/
protected noncomputable def polynomial (g : P →+*[M] Q) : polynomial P →+*[M] polynomial Q :=
{ to_fun := map g,
map_smul' := λ m p, polynomial.induction_on p
(λ b, by rw [smul_C, map_C, coe_fn_coe, g.map_smul, map_C, coe_fn_coe, smul_C])
(λ p q ihp ihq, by rw [smul_add, polynomial.map_add, ihp, ihq, polynomial.map_add, smul_add])
(λ n b ih, by rw [smul_mul', smul_C, smul_pow, smul_X, polynomial.map_mul, map_C,
polynomial.map_pow, map_X, coe_fn_coe, g.map_smul, polynomial.map_mul, map_C,
polynomial.map_pow, map_X, smul_mul', smul_C, smul_pow, smul_X, coe_fn_coe]),
map_zero' := polynomial.map_zero g,
map_add' := λ p q, polynomial.map_add g,
map_one' := polynomial.map_one g,
map_mul' := λ p q, polynomial.map_mul g }
@[simp] theorem coe_polynomial (g : P →+*[M] Q) :
(g.polynomial : polynomial P → polynomial Q) = map g :=
rfl
end mul_semiring_action_hom
|
ff3cc894db79d9bcfd054f5e410fc876956cb9ce | b7b549d2cf38ac9d4e49372b7ad4d37f70449409 | /src/LeanLLVM/Driver.lean | cf4eed10dedb43ea914f90ecdc05dc26b7a2b42f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean-llvm | 7cc196172fe02ff3554edba6cc82f333c30fdc2b | 36e2ec604ae22d8ec1b1b66eca0f8887880db6c6 | refs/heads/master | 1,637,359,020,356 | 1,629,332,114,000 | 1,629,402,464,000 | 146,700,234 | 29 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,631,225,695,000 | 1,535,607,191,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,908 | lean | import Init.Data.RBMap
import Init.Control.Except
import Galois.Data.Bitvec
import LeanLLVM.AST
import LeanLLVM.PP
import LeanLLVM.DataLayout
import LeanLLVM.LLVMLib
import LeanLLVM.LLVMOutput
import LeanLLVM.SimMonad
import LeanLLVM.Simulate
open LLVM.
def readmainActual (x:String) : IO UInt32 := do
ctx ← FFI.newContext;
mb ← FFI.newMemoryBufferFromFile x;
m ← FFI.parseBitcodeFile mb ctx >>= loadModule;
dl <- match computeDataLayout m.dataLayout with
| (Except.error msg) => throw (IO.userError msg)
| (Except.ok dl) => pure dl;
IO.println (ppLLVM m);
st0 <- runInitializers m dl
[(Symbol.mk "arr", bitvec.of_nat 64 0x202000) ];
--let st0 := initializeState m dl;
-- let res :=
-- sim.runFunc (Symbol.mk "add_offset")
-- [ sim.value.bv 64 (bv.from_nat 64 8)
-- , sim.value.bv 32 (bv.from_nat 32 8)
-- ]
-- st0;
res <-
Sim.runFuncPrintTrace (Symbol.mk "run_test")
[
]
st0;
match res with
| (Sim.Value.bv x, _) =>
do IO.println ("0x" ++ (Nat.toDigits 16 x.to_nat).asString);
pure 0
| _ => pure 0
def readmain (xs : List String) : IO UInt32 :=
match xs with
| [x] => readmainActual x
| _ => throw (IO.userError "expected a single command line argument")
def testModule : LLVM.Module :=
LLVM.Module.mk
(some "testmodule")
[]
Array.empty -- types
Array.empty -- named md
Array.empty -- unnamed md
RBMap.empty -- comdat
Array.empty -- globals
Array.empty -- declares
Array.empty -- defines
Array.empty -- inline ASM
Array.empty -- global aliases
def buildmain (xs : List String) : IO UInt32 := do
ctx <- FFI.newContext;
(_,mod) <- Output.run (outputModule ctx testModule);
FFI.printModule mod;
pure 0
--def main := buildmain
def main := readmain
|
1b39bc0bdf8f90318f320042b60f9bdd83953c22 | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/data/set/finite.lean | 671a1b373e3c8ec42633aaed235b1daaf679c966 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,213 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.fintype.basic
/-!
# Finite sets
This file defines predicates `finite : set α → Prop` and `infinite : set α → Prop` and proves some
basic facts about finite sets.
-/
open set function
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace set
/-- A set is finite if the subtype is a fintype, i.e. there is a
list that enumerates its members. -/
def finite (s : set α) : Prop := nonempty (fintype s)
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite. -/
def infinite (s : set α) : Prop := ¬ finite s
/-- The subtype corresponding to a finite set is a finite type. Note
that because `finite` isn't a typeclass, this will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
noncomputable def finite.fintype {s : set α} (h : finite s) : fintype s :=
classical.choice h
/-- Get a finset from a finite set -/
noncomputable def finite.to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) : finset α :=
@set.to_finset _ _ h.fintype
@[simp] theorem finite.mem_to_finset {s : set α} {h : finite s} {a : α} : a ∈ h.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_to_finset _ _ h.fintype _
@[simp] theorem finite.to_finset.nonempty {s : set α} (h : finite s) :
h.to_finset.nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
show (∃ x, x ∈ h.to_finset) ↔ (∃ x, x ∈ s),
from exists_congr (λ _, finite.mem_to_finset)
@[simp] lemma finite.coe_to_finset {α} {s : set α} (h : finite s) : ↑h.to_finset = s :=
@set.coe_to_finset _ s h.fintype
theorem finite.exists_finset {s : set α} : finite s →
∃ s' : finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s
| ⟨h⟩ := by exactI ⟨to_finset s, λ _, mem_to_finset⟩
theorem finite.exists_finset_coe {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
∃ s' : finset α, ↑s' = s :=
⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset⟩
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : can_lift (set α) (finset α) :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := finite,
prf := λ s hs, hs.exists_finset_coe }
theorem finite_mem_finset (s : finset α) : finite {a | a ∈ s} :=
⟨fintype.of_finset s (λ _, iff.rfl)⟩
theorem finite.of_fintype [fintype α] (s : set α) : finite s :=
by classical; exact ⟨set_fintype s⟩
theorem exists_finite_iff_finset {p : set α → Prop} :
(∃ s, finite s ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s : finset α, p ↑s :=
⟨λ ⟨s, hs, hps⟩, ⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset.symm ▸ hps⟩,
λ ⟨s, hs⟩, ⟨↑s, finite_mem_finset s, hs⟩⟩
/-- Membership of a subset of a finite type is decidable.
Using this as an instance leads to potential loops with `subtype.fintype` under certain decidability
assumptions, so it should only be declared a local instance. -/
def decidable_mem_of_fintype [decidable_eq α] (s : set α) [fintype s] (a) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ mem_to_finset
instance fintype_empty : fintype (∅ : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ∅ $ by simp
theorem empty_card : fintype.card (∅ : set α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_card' {h : fintype.{u} (∅ : set α)} :
@fintype.card (∅ : set α) h = 0 :=
eq.trans (by congr) empty_card
@[simp] theorem finite_empty : @finite α ∅ := ⟨set.fintype_empty⟩
instance finite.inhabited : inhabited {s : set α // finite s} := ⟨⟨∅, finite_empty⟩⟩
/-- A `fintype` structure on `insert a s`. -/
def fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨a ::ₘ s.to_finset.1,
multiset.nodup_cons_of_nodup (by simp [h]) s.to_finset.2⟩ $ by simp
theorem card_fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
@fintype.card _ (fintype_insert' s h) = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw [fintype_insert', fintype.card_of_finset];
simp [finset.card, to_finset]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_insert {a : α} (s : set α)
[fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) {d : fintype.{u} (insert a s : set α)} :
@fintype.card _ d = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw ← card_fintype_insert' s h; congr
lemma card_image_of_inj_on {s : set α} [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
calc fintype.card (f '' s) = (s.to_finset.image f).card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... = s.to_finset.card : finset.card_image_of_inj_on
(λ x hx y hy hxy, H x (mem_to_finset.1 hx) y (mem_to_finset.1 hy) hxy)
... = fintype.card s : (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ a, mem_to_finset)).symm
lemma card_image_of_injective (s : set α) [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : function.injective f) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ _ _ _ _ h, H h
section
local attribute [instance] decidable_mem_of_fintype
instance fintype_insert [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : set α) [fintype s] : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then by rwa [insert_eq, union_eq_self_of_subset_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 h)]
else fintype_insert' _ h
end
@[simp] theorem finite.insert (a : α) {s : set α} : finite s → finite (insert a s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_insert _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ h⟩
lemma to_finset_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
(hs.insert a).to_finset = insert a hs.to_finset :=
finset.ext $ by simp
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.induction_on {C : set α → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅) (H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → finite s → C s → C (insert a s)) : C s :=
let ⟨t⟩ := h in by exactI
match s.to_finset, @mem_to_finset _ s _ with
| ⟨l, nd⟩, al := begin
change ∀ a, a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ s at al,
clear _let_match _match t h, revert s nd al,
refine multiset.induction_on l _ (λ a l IH, _); intros s nd al,
{ rw show s = ∅, from eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (by simpa using al),
exact H0 },
{ rw ← show insert a {x | x ∈ l} = s, from set.ext (by simpa using al),
cases multiset.nodup_cons.1 nd with m nd',
refine H1 _ ⟨finset.subtype.fintype ⟨l, nd'⟩⟩ (IH nd' (λ _, iff.rfl)),
exact m }
end
end
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.dinduction_on {C : ∀s:set α, finite s → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅ finite_empty)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → ∀h:finite s, C s h → C (insert a s) (h.insert a)) :
C s h :=
have ∀h:finite s, C s h,
from finite.induction_on h (assume h, H0) (assume a s has hs ih h, H1 has hs (ih _)),
this h
instance fintype_singleton (a : α) : fintype ({a} : set α) :=
unique.fintype
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) :
fintype.card ({a} : set α) = 1 :=
fintype.card_of_subsingleton _
@[simp] theorem finite_singleton (a : α) : finite ({a} : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_singleton _⟩
instance fintype_pure : ∀ a : α, fintype (pure a : set α) :=
set.fintype_singleton
theorem finite_pure (a : α) : finite (pure a : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_pure a⟩
instance fintype_univ [fintype α] : fintype (@univ α) :=
fintype.of_equiv α $ (equiv.set.univ α).symm
theorem finite_univ [fintype α] : finite (@univ α) := ⟨set.fintype_univ⟩
theorem infinite_univ_iff : (@univ α).infinite ↔ _root_.infinite α :=
⟨λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ $ @finite_univ α h₂⟩,
λ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩, h₁ $ @fintype.of_equiv _ _ h₂ $ equiv.set.univ _⟩
theorem infinite_univ [h : _root_.infinite α] : infinite (@univ α) :=
infinite_univ_iff.2 h
theorem infinite_coe_iff {s : set α} : _root_.infinite s ↔ infinite s :=
⟨λ ⟨h₁⟩ h₂, h₁ h₂.some, λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ ⟨h₂⟩⟩⟩
theorem infinite.to_subtype {s : set α} (h : infinite s) : _root_.infinite s :=
infinite_coe_iff.2 h
/-- Embedding of `ℕ` into an infinite set. -/
noncomputable def infinite.nat_embedding (s : set α) (h : infinite s) : ℕ ↪ s :=
by { haveI := h.to_subtype, exact infinite.nat_embedding s }
lemma infinite.exists_subset_card_eq {s : set α} (hs : infinite s) (n : ℕ) :
∃ t : finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.card = n :=
⟨((finset.range n).map (hs.nat_embedding _)).map (embedding.subtype _), by simp⟩
instance fintype_union [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (s ∪ t : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset) $ by simp
theorem finite.union {s t : set α} : finite s → finite t → finite (s ∪ t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ hs ht⟩
instance fintype_sep (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) [fintype s] [decidable_pred p] : fintype ({a ∈ s | p a} : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.filter p) $ by simp
instance fintype_inter (s t : set α) [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] : fintype (s ∩ t : set α) :=
set.fintype_sep s t
/-- A `fintype` structure on a set defines a `fintype` structure on its subset. -/
def fintype_subset (s : set α) {t : set α} [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] (h : t ⊆ s) : fintype t :=
by rw ← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h; apply_instance
theorem finite.subset {s : set α} : finite s → ∀ {t : set α}, t ⊆ s → finite t
| ⟨hs⟩ t h := ⟨@set.fintype_subset _ _ _ hs (classical.dec_pred t) h⟩
theorem infinite_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : infinite s → infinite t :=
mt (λ ht, ht.subset h)
instance fintype_image [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s] : fintype (f '' s) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.image f) $ by simp
instance fintype_range [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) [fintype α] : fintype (range f) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.image f) $ by simp [range]
theorem finite_range (f : α → β) [fintype α] : finite (range f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact ⟨by apply_instance⟩
theorem finite.image {s : set α} (f : α → β) : finite s → finite (f '' s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_image _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ _ h⟩
lemma finite.dependent_image {s : set α} (hs : finite s) {F : Π i ∈ s, β} {t : set β}
(H : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x (hx : x ∈ s), y = F x hx) : set.finite t :=
begin
let G : s → β := λ x, F x.1 x.2,
have A : t ⊆ set.range G,
{ assume y hy,
rcases H y hy with ⟨x, hx, xy⟩,
refine ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, xy.symm⟩ },
letI : fintype s := finite.fintype hs,
exact (finite_range G).subset A
end
instance fintype_map {α β} [decidable_eq β] :
∀ (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s], fintype (f <$> s) := set.fintype_image
theorem finite.map {α β} {s : set α} :
∀ (f : α → β), finite s → finite (f <$> s) := finite.image
/-- If a function `f` has a partial inverse and sends a set `s` to a set with `[fintype]` instance,
then `s` has a `fintype` structure as well. -/
def fintype_of_fintype_image (s : set α)
{f : α → β} {g} (I : is_partial_inv f g) [fintype (f '' s)] : fintype s :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨_, @multiset.nodup_filter_map β α g _
(@injective_of_partial_inv_right _ _ f g I) (f '' s).to_finset.2⟩ $ λ a,
begin
suffices : (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s,
by simpa [exists_and_distrib_left.symm, and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc],
rw exists_swap,
suffices : (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s, {simpa [and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc]},
simp [I _, (injective_of_partial_inv I).eq_iff]
end
theorem finite_of_finite_image {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : set.inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) → finite s | ⟨h⟩ :=
⟨@fintype.of_injective _ _ h (λa:s, ⟨f a.1, mem_image_of_mem f a.2⟩) $
assume a b eq, subtype.eq $ hi a.2 b.2 $ subtype.ext_iff_val.1 eq⟩
theorem finite_image_iff {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) ↔ finite s :=
⟨finite_of_finite_image hi, finite.image _⟩
theorem finite.preimage {s : set β} {f : α → β}
(I : set.inj_on f (f⁻¹' s)) (h : finite s) : finite (f ⁻¹' s) :=
finite_of_finite_image I (h.subset (image_preimage_subset f s))
instance fintype_Union [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
(f : ι → set α) [∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.bind (λ i, (f i).to_finset)) $ by simp
theorem finite_Union {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {f : ι → set α} (H : ∀i, finite (f i)) : finite (⋃ i, f i) :=
⟨@set.fintype_Union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ _ (λ i, finite.fintype (H i))⟩
/-- A union of sets with `fintype` structure over a set with `fintype` structure has a `fintype`
structure. -/
def fintype_bUnion [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) (H : ∀ i ∈ s, fintype (f i)) : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
by rw bUnion_eq_Union; exact
@set.fintype_Union _ _ _ _ _ (by rintro ⟨i, hi⟩; exact H i hi)
instance fintype_bUnion' [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) [H : ∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
fintype_bUnion _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite.sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : finite s) (H : ∀t∈s, finite t) : finite (⋃₀ s) :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union; haveI := finite.fintype h;
apply finite_Union; simpa using H
theorem finite.bUnion {α} {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} {f : Π i ∈ s, set α} :
finite s → (∀ i ∈ s, finite (f i ‹_›)) → finite (⋃ i∈s, f i ‹_›)
| ⟨hs⟩ h := by rw [bUnion_eq_Union]; exactI finite_Union (λ i, h _ _)
instance fintype_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i < n} :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
instance fintype_le_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i ≤ n} :=
by simpa [nat.lt_succ_iff] using set.fintype_lt_nat (n+1)
lemma finite_le_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i ≤ n} := ⟨set.fintype_le_nat _⟩
lemma finite_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i < n} := ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
instance fintype_prod (s : set α) (t : set β) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (set.prod s t) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.product t.to_finset) $ by simp
lemma finite.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} : finite s → finite t → finite (set.prod s t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := by exactI ⟨set.fintype_prod s t⟩
/-- `image2 f s t` is finitype if `s` and `t` are. -/
instance fintype_image2 [decidable_eq γ] (f : α → β → γ) (s : set α) (t : set β)
[hs : fintype s] [ht : fintype t] : fintype (image2 f s t : set γ) :=
by { rw ← image_prod, apply set.fintype_image }
lemma finite.image2 (f : α → β → γ) {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : finite s) (ht : finite t) :
finite (image2 f s t) :=
by { rw ← image_prod, exact (hs.prod ht).image _ }
/-- If `s : set α` is a set with `fintype` instance and `f : α → set β` is a function such that
each `f a`, `a ∈ s`, has a `fintype` structure, then `s >>= f` has a `fintype` structure. -/
def fintype_bind {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, fintype (f a)) : fintype (s >>= f) :=
set.fintype_bUnion _ H
instance fintype_bind' {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) [H : ∀ a, fintype (f a)] : fintype (s >>= f) :=
fintype_bind _ _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite_bind {α β} {s : set α} {f : α → set β} :
finite s → (∀ a ∈ s, finite (f a)) → finite (s >>= f)
| ⟨hs⟩ H := ⟨@fintype_bind _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ hs _ (λ a ha, (H a ha).fintype)⟩
instance fintype_seq {α β : Type u} [decidable_eq β]
(f : set (α → β)) (s : set α) [fintype f] [fintype s] :
fintype (f <*> s) :=
by rw seq_eq_bind_map; apply set.fintype_bind'
theorem finite.seq {α β : Type u} {f : set (α → β)} {s : set α} :
finite f → finite s → finite (f <*> s)
| ⟨hf⟩ ⟨hs⟩ := by { haveI := classical.dec_eq β, exactI ⟨set.fintype_seq _ _⟩ }
/-- There are finitely many subsets of a given finite set -/
lemma finite.finite_subsets {α : Type u} {a : set α} (h : finite a) : finite {b | b ⊆ a} :=
begin
-- we just need to translate the result, already known for finsets,
-- to the language of finite sets
let s : set (set α) := coe '' (↑(finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)) : set (finset α)),
have : finite s := (finite_mem_finset _).image _,
apply this.subset,
refine λ b hb, ⟨(h.subset hb).to_finset, _, finite.coe_to_finset _⟩,
simpa [finset.subset_iff]
end
lemma exists_min_image [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f a ≤ f b
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using (finite.to_finset h1).exists_min_image f ⟨x, finite.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
lemma exists_max_image [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ f a
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using (finite.to_finset h1).exists_max_image f ⟨x, finite.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
end set
namespace finset
variables [decidable_eq β]
variables {s : finset α}
lemma finite_to_set (s : finset α) : set.finite (↑s : set α) :=
set.finite_mem_finset s
@[simp] lemma coe_bind {f : α → finset β} : ↑(s.bind f) = (⋃x ∈ (↑s : set α), ↑(f x) : set β) :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma finite_to_set_to_finset {α : Type*} (s : finset α) :
(finite_to_set s).to_finset = s :=
by { ext, rw [set.finite.mem_to_finset, mem_coe] }
end finset
namespace set
lemma finite_subset_Union {s : set α} (hs : finite s)
{ι} {t : ι → set α} (h : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i) : ∃ I : set ι, finite I ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i :=
begin
casesI hs,
choose f hf using show ∀ x : s, ∃ i, x.1 ∈ t i, {simpa [subset_def] using h},
refine ⟨range f, finite_range f, _⟩,
rintro x hx,
simp,
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx, hf _⟩⟩,
end
lemma eq_finite_Union_of_finite_subset_Union {ι} {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} (tfin : finite t) (h : t ⊆ ⋃ i, s i) :
∃ I : set ι, (finite I) ∧ ∃ σ : {i | i ∈ I} → set α,
(∀ i, finite (σ i)) ∧ (∀ i, σ i ⊆ s i) ∧ t = ⋃ i, σ i :=
let ⟨I, Ifin, hI⟩ := finite_subset_Union tfin h in
⟨I, Ifin, λ x, s x ∩ t,
λ i, tfin.subset (inter_subset_right _ _),
λ i, inter_subset_left _ _,
begin
ext x,
rw mem_Union,
split,
{ intro x_in,
rcases mem_Union.mp (hI x_in) with ⟨i, _, ⟨hi, rfl⟩, H⟩,
use [i, hi, H, x_in] },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact H }
end⟩
/-- An increasing union distributes over finite intersection. -/
lemma Union_Inter_of_monotone {ι ι' α : Type*} [fintype ι] [decidable_linear_order ι']
[nonempty ι'] {s : ι → ι' → set α} (hs : ∀ i, monotone (s i)) :
(⋃ j : ι', ⋂ i : ι, s i j) = ⋂ i : ι, ⋃ j : ι', s i j :=
begin
ext x, refine ⟨λ hx, Union_Inter_subset hx, λ hx, _⟩,
simp only [mem_Inter, mem_Union, mem_Inter] at hx ⊢, choose j hj using hx,
obtain ⟨j₀⟩ := show nonempty ι', by apply_instance,
refine ⟨finset.univ.fold max j₀ j, λ i, hs i _ (hj i)⟩,
rw [finset.fold_op_rel_iff_or (@le_max_iff _ _)],
exact or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_univ i, le_rfl⟩
end
instance nat.fintype_Iio (n : ℕ) : fintype (Iio n) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
/--
If `P` is some relation between terms of `γ` and sets in `γ`,
such that every finite set `t : set γ` has some `c : γ` related to it,
then there is a recursively defined sequence `u` in `γ`
so `u n` is related to the image of `{0, 1, ..., n-1}` under `u`.
(We use this later to show sequentially compact sets
are totally bounded.)
-/
lemma seq_of_forall_finite_exists {γ : Type*}
{P : γ → set γ → Prop} (h : ∀ t, finite t → ∃ c, P c t) :
∃ u : ℕ → γ, ∀ n, P (u n) (u '' Iio n) :=
⟨λ n, @nat.strong_rec_on' (λ _, γ) n $ λ n ih, classical.some $ h
(range $ λ m : Iio n, ih m.1 m.2)
(finite_range _),
λ n, begin
classical,
refine nat.strong_rec_on' n (λ n ih, _),
rw nat.strong_rec_on_beta', convert classical.some_spec (h _ _),
ext x, split,
{ rintros ⟨m, hmn, rfl⟩, exact ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, rfl⟩, exact ⟨m, hmn, rfl⟩ }
end⟩
lemma finite_range_ite {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f g : α → β} (hf : finite (range f))
(hg : finite (range g)) : finite (range (λ x, if p x then f x else g x)) :=
(hf.union hg).subset range_ite_subset
lemma finite_range_const {c : β} : finite (range (λ x : α, c)) :=
(finite_singleton c).subset range_const_subset
lemma range_find_greatest_subset {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ}:
range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b) ⊆ ↑(finset.range (b + 1)) :=
by { rw range_subset_iff, assume x, simp [nat.lt_succ_iff, nat.find_greatest_le] }
lemma finite_range_find_greatest {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ} :
finite (range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b)) :=
(finset.range (b + 1)).finite_to_set.subset range_find_greatest_subset
lemma card_lt_card {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (h : s ⊂ t) :
fintype.card s < fintype.card t :=
begin
rw [← s.coe_to_finset, ← t.coe_to_finset, finset.coe_ssubset] at h,
rw [fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset),
fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset)],
exact finset.card_lt_card h,
end
lemma card_le_of_subset {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (hsub : s ⊆ t) :
fintype.card s ≤ fintype.card t :=
calc fintype.card s = s.to_finset.card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... ≤ t.to_finset.card : finset.card_le_of_subset (λ x hx, by simp [set.subset_def, *] at *)
... = fintype.card t : eq.symm (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp))
lemma eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t]
(hsub : s ⊆ t) (hcard : fintype.card t ≤ fintype.card s) : s = t :=
(eq_or_ssubset_of_subset hsub).elim id
(λ h, absurd hcard $ not_le_of_lt $ card_lt_card h)
lemma card_range_of_injective [fintype α] {f : α → β} (hf : injective f)
[fintype (range f)] : fintype.card (range f) = fintype.card α :=
eq.symm $ fintype.card_congr $ equiv.set.range f hf
lemma finite.exists_maximal_wrt [partial_order β] (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : set.finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃a∈s, ∀a'∈s, f a ≤ f a' → f a = f a' :=
begin
classical,
refine h.induction_on _ _,
{ assume h, exact absurd h empty_not_nonempty },
assume a s his _ ih _,
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ use a, simp [h] },
rcases ih h with ⟨b, hb, ih⟩,
by_cases f b ≤ f a,
{ refine ⟨a, set.mem_insert _ _, assume c hc hac, le_antisymm hac _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ refl },
{ rwa [← ih c hcs (le_trans h hac)] } },
{ refine ⟨b, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hb, assume c hc hbc, _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ exact (h hbc).elim },
{ exact ih c hcs hbc } }
end
lemma finite.card_to_finset {s : set α} [fintype s] (h : s.finite) :
h.to_finset.card = fintype.card s :=
by { rw [← finset.card_attach, finset.attach_eq_univ, ← fintype.card], congr' 2, funext,
rw set.finite.mem_to_finset }
section
local attribute [instance, priority 1] classical.prop_decidable
lemma to_finset_inter {α : Type*} [fintype α] (s t : set α) :
(s ∩ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∩ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
end
section
variables [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded above.-/
protected lemma finite.bdd_above (hs : finite s) : bdd_above s :=
finite.induction_on hs bdd_above_empty $ λ a s _ _ h, h.insert a
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded above is still bounded above.-/
lemma finite.bdd_above_bUnion {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_above (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_above (S i)) :=
finite.induction_on H
(by simp only [bUnion_empty, bdd_above_empty, ball_empty_iff])
(λ a s ha _ hs, by simp only [bUnion_insert, ball_insert_iff, bdd_above_union, hs])
end
section
variables [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded below.-/
protected lemma finite.bdd_below (hs : finite s) : bdd_below s :=
@finite.bdd_above (order_dual α) _ _ _ hs
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded below is still bounded below.-/
lemma finite.bdd_below_bUnion {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_below (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_below (S i)) :=
@finite.bdd_above_bUnion (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ H
end
end set
namespace finset
/-- A finset is bounded above. -/
protected lemma bdd_above [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] (s : finset α) :
bdd_above (↑s : set α) :=
s.finite_to_set.bdd_above
/-- A finset is bounded below. -/
protected lemma bdd_below [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] (s : finset α) :
bdd_below (↑s : set α) :=
s.finite_to_set.bdd_below
end finset
lemma fintype.exists_max [fintype α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type*} [linear_order β] (f : α → β) :
∃ x₀ : α, ∀ x, f x ≤ f x₀ :=
begin
rcases set.finite_univ.exists_maximal_wrt f _ univ_nonempty with ⟨x, _, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, λ y, (le_total (f x) (f y)).elim (λ h, ge_of_eq $ hx _ trivial h) id⟩
end
|
e7c1a94ecd2625a42f2fa8cb9f81c6fb6792491e | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/class4.lean | c66da2bd2c05697a5186156fb796804ae3adad58 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,469 | lean | prelude
import logic
namespace experiment
inductive nat : Type :=
| zero : nat
| succ : nat → nat
open eq
namespace nat
definition add (x y : nat)
:= nat.rec x (λ n r, succ r) y
infixl `+` := add
theorem add.left_id (x : nat) : x + zero = x
:= refl _
theorem succ_add (x y : nat) : x + (succ y) = succ (x + y)
:= refl _
definition is_zero (x : nat)
:= nat.rec true (λ n r, false) x
theorem is_zero_zero : is_zero zero
:= of_eq_true (refl _)
theorem not_is_zero_succ (x : nat) : ¬ is_zero (succ x)
:= not_of_eq_false (refl _)
theorem dichotomy (m : nat) : m = zero ∨ (∃ n, m = succ n)
:= nat.rec
(or.intro_left _ (refl zero))
(λ m H, or.intro_right _ (exists.intro m (refl (succ m))))
m
theorem is_zero_to_eq (x : nat) (H : is_zero x) : x = zero
:= or.elim (dichotomy x)
(assume Hz : x = zero, Hz)
(assume Hs : (∃ n, x = succ n),
exists.elim Hs (λ (w : nat) (Hw : x = succ w),
absurd H (eq.subst (symm Hw) (not_is_zero_succ w))))
theorem is_not_zero_to_eq {x : nat} (H : ¬ is_zero x) : ∃ n, x = succ n
:= or.elim (dichotomy x)
(assume Hz : x = zero,
absurd (eq.subst (symm Hz) is_zero_zero) H)
(assume Hs, Hs)
theorem not_zero_add (x y : nat) (H : ¬ is_zero y) : ¬ is_zero (x + y)
:= exists.elim (is_not_zero_to_eq H)
(λ (w : nat) (Hw : y = succ w),
have H1 : x + y = succ (x + w), from
calc x + y = x + succ w : {Hw}
... = succ (x + w) : refl _,
have H2 : ¬ is_zero (succ (x + w)), from
not_is_zero_succ (x+w),
subst (symm H1) H2)
inductive not_zero [class] (x : nat) : Prop :=
intro : ¬ is_zero x → not_zero x
theorem not_zero_not_is_zero {x : nat} (H : not_zero x) : ¬ is_zero x
:= not_zero.rec (λ H1, H1) H
theorem not_zero_add_right [instance] (x y : nat) (H : not_zero y) : not_zero (x + y)
:= not_zero.intro (not_zero_add x y (not_zero_not_is_zero H))
theorem not_zero_succ [instance] (x : nat) : not_zero (succ x)
:= not_zero.intro (not_is_zero_succ x)
constant dvd : Π (x y : nat) {H : not_zero y}, nat
constants a b : nat
set_option pp.implicit true
attribute add [reducible]
check dvd a (succ b)
check (λ H : not_zero b, dvd a b)
check (succ zero)
check a + (succ zero)
check dvd a (a + (succ b))
attribute add [irreducible]
check dvd a (a + (succ b))
attribute add [reducible]
check dvd a (a + (succ b))
attribute add [irreducible]
check dvd a (a + (succ b))
end nat
end experiment
|
0ec0e261b5cbfaebe8a88da2756e344de8c661e9 | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/ring_theory/ideal/operations.lean | 25dfa32d00f421ba5d712a1e9aec09a7443745e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 89,968 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.algebra.operations
import algebra.ring.equiv
import data.nat.choose.sum
import ring_theory.coprime.lemmas
import ring_theory.ideal.quotient
import ring_theory.non_zero_divisors
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
universes u v w x
open_locale big_operators pointwise
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {F : Type*} {G : Type*}
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
open_locale pointwise
instance has_smul' : has_smul (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
⟨submodule.map₂ (linear_map.lsmul R M)⟩
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected lemma _root_.ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : ideal R) : I • J = I * J := rfl
/-- `N.annihilator` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • N = 0`. -/
def annihilator (N : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
(linear_map.lsmul R N).ker
variables {I J : ideal R} {N P : submodule R M}
theorem mem_annihilator {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0:M) :=
⟨λ hr n hn, congr_arg subtype.val (linear_map.ext_iff.1 (linear_map.mem_ker.1 hr) ⟨n, hn⟩),
λ h, linear_map.mem_ker.2 $ linear_map.ext $ λ n, subtype.eq $ h n.1 n.2⟩
theorem mem_annihilator' {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ N ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) ⊥ :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).2 $ H n hn, λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).1 $ H hn⟩
lemma mem_annihilator_span (s : set M) (r : R) :
r ∈ (submodule.span R s).annihilator ↔ ∀ n : s, r • (n : M) = 0 :=
begin
rw submodule.mem_annihilator,
split,
{ intros h n, exact h _ (submodule.subset_span n.prop) },
{ intros h n hn,
apply submodule.span_induction hn,
{ intros x hx, exact h ⟨x, hx⟩ },
{ exact smul_zero _ },
{ intros x y hx hy, rw [smul_add, hx, hy, zero_add] },
{ intros a x hx, rw [smul_comm, hx, smul_zero] } }
end
lemma mem_annihilator_span_singleton (g : M) (r : R) :
r ∈ (submodule.span R ({g} : set M)).annihilator ↔ r • g = 0 :=
by simp [mem_annihilator_span]
theorem annihilator_bot : (⊥ : submodule R M).annihilator = ⊤ :=
(ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ mem_annihilator'.2 bot_le
theorem annihilator_eq_top_iff : N.annihilator = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊥ :=
⟨λ H, eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ (n:M) hn, (mem_bot R).2 $
one_smul R n ▸ mem_annihilator.1 ((ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).1 H) n hn,
λ H, H.symm ▸ annihilator_bot⟩
theorem annihilator_mono (h : N ≤ P) : P.annihilator ≤ N.annihilator :=
λ r hrp, mem_annihilator.2 $ λ n hn, mem_annihilator.1 hrp n $ h hn
theorem annihilator_supr (ι : Sort w) (f : ι → submodule R M) :
(annihilator ⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, annihilator (f i) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, annihilator_mono $ le_supr _ _)
(λ r H, mem_annihilator'.2 $ supr_le $ λ i,
have _ := (mem_infi _).1 H i, mem_annihilator'.1 this)
theorem smul_mem_smul {r} {n} (hr : r ∈ I) (hn : n ∈ N) : r • n ∈ I • N := apply_mem_map₂ _ hr hn
theorem smul_le {P : submodule R M} : I • N ≤ P ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), r • n ∈ P := map₂_le
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem smul_induction_on {p : M → Prop} {x} (H : x ∈ I • N)
(Hb : ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), p (r • n))
(H1 : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) : p x :=
begin
have H0 : p 0 := by simpa only [zero_smul] using Hb 0 I.zero_mem 0 N.zero_mem,
refine submodule.supr_induction _ H _ H0 H1,
rintros ⟨i, hi⟩ m ⟨j, hj, (rfl : i • _ = m) ⟩,
exact Hb _ hi _ hj,
end
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨λ hx, smul_induction_on hx
(λ r hri n hnm,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm in ⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
(λ m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩,
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩),
λ ⟨y, hyi, hy⟩, hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span $ set.mem_singleton m)⟩
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n, N.smul_mem r
theorem smul_mono (hij : I ≤ J) (hnp : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ J • P := map₂_le_map₂ hij hnp
theorem smul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I • N ≤ J • N := map₂_le_map₂_left h
theorem smul_mono_right (h : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ I • P := map₂_le_map₂_right h
lemma map_le_smul_top (I : ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : submodule R M) :=
begin
rintros _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩,
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul],
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
end
@[simp] theorem annihilator_smul (N : submodule R M) : annihilator N • N = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 (smul_le.2 (λ r, mem_annihilator.1))
@[simp] theorem annihilator_mul (I : ideal R) : annihilator I * I = ⊥ :=
annihilator_smul I
@[simp] theorem mul_annihilator (I : ideal R) : I * annihilator I = ⊥ :=
by rw [mul_comm, annihilator_mul]
variables (I J N P)
@[simp] theorem smul_bot : I • (⊥ : submodule R M) = ⊥ := map₂_bot_right _ _
@[simp] theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : ideal R) • N = ⊥ := map₂_bot_left _ _
@[simp] theorem top_smul : (⊤ : ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right $ λ r hri, one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
theorem smul_sup : I • (N ⊔ P) = I • N ⊔ I • P := map₂_sup_right _ _ _ _
theorem sup_smul : (I ⊔ J) • N = I • N ⊔ J • N := map₂_sup_left _ _ _ _
protected theorem smul_assoc : (I • J) • N = I • (J • N) :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ rs hrsij t htn,
smul_induction_on hrsij
(λ r hr s hs,
(@smul_eq_mul R _ r s).symm ▸ smul_smul r s t ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (smul_mem_smul hs htn))
(λ x y, (add_smul x y t).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _))
(smul_le.2 $ λ r hr sn hsn, suffices J • N ≤ submodule.comap (r • linear_map.id) ((I • J) • N),
from this hsn,
smul_le.2 $ λ s hs n hn, show r • (s • n) ∈ (I • J) • N,
from mul_smul r s n ▸ smul_mem_smul (smul_mem_smul hr hs) hn)
lemma smul_inf_le (M₁ M₂ : submodule R M) : I • (M₁ ⊓ M₂) ≤ I • M₁ ⊓ I • M₂ :=
le_inf (submodule.smul_mono_right inf_le_left) (submodule.smul_mono_right inf_le_right)
lemma smul_supr {ι : Sort*} {I : ideal R} {t : ι → submodule R M} :
I • supr t = ⨆ i, I • t i :=
map₂_supr_right _ _ _
lemma smul_infi_le {ι : Sort*} {I : ideal R} {t : ι → submodule R M} :
I • infi t ≤ ⨅ i, I • t i :=
le_infi (λ i, smul_mono_right (infi_le _ _))
variables (S : set R) (T : set M)
theorem span_smul_span : (ideal.span S) • (span R T) =
span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) :=
(map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans $ congr_arg _ $ set.image2_eq_Union _ _ _
lemma ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : submodule R M) :
(ideal.span {r} : ideal R) • N = r • N :=
begin
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (x : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N,
{ convert span_eq _, exact (set.image_eq_Union _ (N : set M)).symm },
conv_lhs { rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span] },
simpa
end
lemma span_smul_eq (r : R) (s : set M) : span R (r • s) = r • span R s :=
by rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, span_smul_span, ←set.image2_eq_Union,
set.image2_singleton_left, set.image_smul]
lemma mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : submodule R M)
(s : set R) (hs : ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' :=
begin
suffices : (⊤ : ideal R) • (span R ({x} : set M)) ≤ M',
{ rw top_smul at this, exact this (subset_span (set.mem_singleton x)) },
rw [← hs, span_smul_span, span_le],
simpa using H
end
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
lemma mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : submodule R M)
(s : set R) (hs : ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, ∃ (n : ℕ), (r ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' :=
begin
obtain ⟨s', hs₁, hs₂⟩ := (ideal.span_eq_top_iff_finite _).mp hs,
replace H : ∀ r : s', ∃ (n : ℕ), (r ^ n : R) • x ∈ M' := λ r, H ⟨_, hs₁ r.prop⟩,
choose n₁ n₂ using H,
let N := s'.attach.sup n₁,
have hs' := ideal.span_pow_eq_top (s' : set R) hs₂ N,
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ hs',
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩,
convert M'.smul_mem (r ^ (N - n₁ ⟨r, hr⟩)) (n₂ ⟨r, hr⟩) using 1,
simp only [subtype.coe_mk, smul_smul, ← pow_add],
rw tsub_add_cancel_of_le (finset.le_sup (s'.mem_attach _) : n₁ ⟨r, hr⟩ ≤ N),
end
variables {M' : Type w} [add_comm_monoid M'] [module R M']
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f,
from (f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) $
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn in
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
variables {I}
lemma mem_smul_span {s : set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : set M)) :=
by rw [← I.span_eq, submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]; refl
variables (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
lemma mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (ha : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), a.sum (λ i c, c • f i) = x :=
begin
split, swap,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
exact submodule.sum_mem _ (λ c _, smul_mem_smul (ha c) $ subset_span $ set.mem_range_self _) },
refine λ hx, span_induction (mem_smul_span.mp hx) _ _ _ _,
{ simp only [set.mem_Union, set.mem_range, set.mem_singleton_iff],
rintros x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨finsupp.single i y, λ j, _, _⟩,
{ letI := classical.dec_eq ι,
rw finsupp.single_apply, split_ifs, { assumption }, { exact I.zero_mem } },
refine @finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (λ i y, y • f i) _,
simp },
{ exact ⟨0, λ i, I.zero_mem, finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩ },
{ rintros x y ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨ax + ay, λ i, I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), finsupp.sum_add_index _ _⟩;
intros; simp only [zero_smul, add_smul] },
{ rintros c x ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨c • a, λ i, I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), _⟩,
rw [finsupp.sum_smul_index, finsupp.smul_sum];
intros; simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul] },
end
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (ha : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), a.sum (λ i c, c • f i) = x :=
by rw [← submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← set.image_eq_range]
@[simp] lemma smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : submodule R M') (I : ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f :=
begin
refine (submodule.smul_le.mpr (λ r hr x hx, _)),
rw [submodule.mem_comap] at ⊢ hx,
rw f.map_smul,
exact submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end
end comm_semiring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {N N₁ N₂ P P₁ P₂ : submodule R M}
/-- `N.colon P` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • P ⊆ N`. -/
def colon (N P : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
annihilator (P.map N.mkq)
theorem mem_colon {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ ∀ p ∈ P, r • p ∈ N :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H p hp, (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).1 (H (quotient.mk p) (mem_map_of_mem hp)),
λ H m ⟨p, hp, hpm⟩, hpm ▸ (N.mkq).map_smul r p ▸ (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).2 $ H p hp⟩
theorem mem_colon' {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ P ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) N :=
mem_colon
theorem colon_mono (hn : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hp : P₁ ≤ P₂) : N₁.colon P₂ ≤ N₂.colon P₁ :=
λ r hrnp, mem_colon.2 $ λ p₁ hp₁, hn $ mem_colon.1 hrnp p₁ $ hp hp₁
theorem infi_colon_supr (ι₁ : Sort w) (f : ι₁ → submodule R M)
(ι₂ : Sort x) (g : ι₂ → submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, f i).colon (⨆ j, g j) = ⨅ i j, (f i).colon (g j) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ λ j, colon_mono (infi_le _ _) (le_supr _ _))
(λ r H, mem_colon'.2 $ supr_le $ λ j, map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ le_infi $ λ i,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mem_colon'.1 $ have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 H i),
have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 this j), this)
end comm_ring
end submodule
namespace ideal
section add
variables {R : Type u} [semiring R]
@[simp] lemma add_eq_sup {I J : ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_bot : (0 : ideal R) = ⊥ := rfl
end add
section mul_and_radical
variables {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
variables {I J K L : ideal R}
instance : has_mul (ideal R) := ⟨(•)⟩
@[simp] lemma one_eq_top : (1 : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
by erw [submodule.one_eq_range, linear_map.range_id]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
lemma pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
lemma prod_mem_prod {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {I : ι → ideal R} {x : ι → R} :
(∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ I i) → ∏ i in s, x i ∈ ∏ i in s, I i :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
{ intro _, rw [finset.prod_empty, finset.prod_empty, one_eq_top], exact submodule.mem_top },
{ intros a s ha IH h,
rw [finset.prod_insert ha, finset.prod_insert ha],
exact mul_mem_mul (h a $ finset.mem_insert_self a s)
(IH $ λ i hi, h i $ finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) }
end
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (s ∈ J), r * s ∈ K :=
submodule.smul_le
lemma mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
ideal.mul_le.2 (λ r hr s, J.mul_mem_left _)
lemma mul_le_right : I * J ≤ I :=
ideal.mul_le.2 (λ r hr s hs, I.mul_mem_right _ hr)
@[simp] lemma sup_mul_right_self : I ⊔ (I * J) = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 ideal.mul_le_right
@[simp] lemma sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ (J * I) = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 ideal.mul_le_left
@[simp] lemma mul_right_self_sup : (I * J) ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 ideal.mul_le_right
@[simp] lemma mul_left_self_sup : (J * I) ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 ideal.mul_le_left
variables (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 $ λ r hrI s hsJ, mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 $ λ r hrJ s hsI, mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
protected theorem mul_assoc : (I * J) * K = I * (J * K) :=
submodule.smul_assoc I J K
theorem span_mul_span (S T : set R) : span S * span T =
span ⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t} :=
submodule.span_smul_span S T
variables {I J K}
lemma span_mul_span' (S T : set R) : span S * span T = span (S*T) :=
by { unfold span, rw submodule.span_mul_span, }
lemma span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : ideal R) :=
by { unfold span, rw [submodule.span_mul_span, set.singleton_mul_singleton], }
lemma span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ):
span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : ideal R) :=
begin
induction n with n ih, { simp [set.singleton_one], },
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton],
end
lemma mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : R} {I : ideal R} :
x ∈ I * span {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, z * y = x :=
submodule.mem_smul_span_singleton
lemma mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I : ideal R} :
x ∈ span {y} * I ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, y * z = x :=
by simp only [mul_comm, mem_mul_span_singleton]
lemma le_span_singleton_mul_iff {x : R} {I J : ideal R} :
I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (hzI : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ span {x} * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI,
by simp only [mem_span_singleton_mul]
lemma span_singleton_mul_le_iff {x : R} {I J : ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J :=
begin
simp only [mul_le, mem_span_singleton_mul, mem_span_singleton],
split,
{ intros h zI hzI,
exact h x (dvd_refl x) zI hzI },
{ rintros h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI,
rw [mul_comm x z, mul_assoc],
exact J.mul_mem_left _ (h zI hzI) },
end
lemma span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I J : ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ span {y} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ :=
by simp only [span_singleton_mul_le_iff, mem_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
lemma eq_span_singleton_mul {x : R} (I J : ideal R) :
I = span {x} * J ↔ ((∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ (∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I)) :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_mul_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_iff]
lemma span_singleton_mul_eq_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} (I J : ideal R) :
span {x} * I = span {y} * J ↔
((∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ) ∧
(∀ zJ ∈ J, ∃ zI ∈ I, x * zI = y * zJ)) :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
lemma prod_span {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (I : ι → set R) :
(∏ i in s, ideal.span (I i)) = ideal.span (∏ i in s, I i) :=
submodule.prod_span s I
lemma prod_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (I : ι → R) :
(∏ i in s, ideal.span ({I i} : set R)) = ideal.span {∏ i in s, I i} :=
submodule.prod_span_singleton s I
lemma finset_inf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (I : ι → R)
(hI : set.pairwise ↑s (is_coprime on I)) :
(s.inf $ λ i, ideal.span ({I i} : set R)) = ideal.span {∏ i in s, I i} :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [submodule.mem_finset_inf, ideal.mem_span_singleton],
exact ⟨finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime hI,
λ h i hi, (finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ hi).trans h⟩
end
lemma infi_span_singleton {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] (I : ι → R)
(hI : ∀ i j (hij : i ≠ j), is_coprime (I i) (I j)):
(⨅ i, ideal.span ({I i} : set R)) = ideal.span {∏ i, I i} :=
begin
rw [← finset.inf_univ_eq_infi, finset_inf_span_singleton],
rwa [finset.coe_univ, set.pairwise_univ]
end
lemma sup_eq_top_iff_is_coprime {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (x y : R) :
span ({x} : set R) ⊔ span {y} = ⊤ ↔ is_coprime x y :=
begin
rw [eq_top_iff_one, submodule.mem_sup],
split,
{ rintro ⟨u, hu, v, hv, h1⟩,
rw mem_span_singleton' at hu hv,
rw [← hu.some_spec, ← hv.some_spec] at h1,
exact ⟨_, _, h1⟩ },
{ exact λ ⟨u, v, h1⟩,
⟨_, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, h1⟩ },
end
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj, ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem multiset_prod_le_inf {s : multiset (ideal R)} :
s.prod ≤ s.inf :=
begin
classical, refine s.induction_on _ _,
{ rw [multiset.inf_zero], exact le_top },
intros a s ih,
rw [multiset.prod_cons, multiset.inf_cons],
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf le_rfl ih)
end
theorem prod_le_inf {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
multiset_prod_le_inf
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf $ λ r ⟨hri, hrj⟩,
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h) in
mul_one r ▸ hst ▸ (mul_add r s t).symm ▸ ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj)
(mul_mem_mul hri htj)
lemma sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ (J * K) = I ⊔ K :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left mul_le_left _) $ λ i hi,
begin
rw eq_top_iff_one at h, rw submodule.mem_sup at h hi ⊢,
obtain ⟨i1, hi1, j, hj, h⟩ := h, obtain ⟨i', hi', k, hk, hi⟩ := hi,
refine ⟨_, add_mem hi' (mul_mem_right k _ hi1), _, mul_mem_mul hj hk, _⟩,
rw [add_assoc, ← add_mul, h, one_mul, hi]
end
lemma sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right (h : I ⊔ K = ⊤) : I ⊔ (J * K) = I ⊔ J :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h }
lemma mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : (I * K) ⊔ J = K ⊔ J :=
by { rw sup_comm at h, rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h, sup_comm] }
lemma mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_right (h : K ⊔ J = ⊤) : (I * K) ⊔ J = I ⊔ J :=
by { rw sup_comm at h, rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right h, sup_comm] }
lemma sup_prod_eq_top {s : finset ι} {J : ι → ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
I ⊔ ∏ i in s, J i = ⊤ :=
finset.prod_induction _ (λ J, I ⊔ J = ⊤) (λ J K hJ hK, (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hJ).trans hK)
(by rw [one_eq_top, sup_top_eq]) h
lemma sup_infi_eq_top {s : finset ι} {J : ι → ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
I ⊔ (⨅ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr $ le_of_eq_of_le (sup_prod_eq_top h).symm $ sup_le_sup_left
(le_of_le_of_eq prod_le_inf $ finset.inf_eq_infi _ _) _
lemma prod_sup_eq_top {s : finset ι} {J : ι → ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(∏ i in s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ :=
sup_comm.trans (sup_prod_eq_top $ λ i hi, sup_comm.trans $ h i hi)
lemma infi_sup_eq_top {s : finset ι} {J : ι → ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ :=
sup_comm.trans (sup_infi_eq_top $ λ i hi, sup_comm.trans $ h i hi)
lemma sup_pow_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ (J ^ n) = ⊤ :=
by { rw [← finset.card_range n, ← finset.prod_const], exact sup_prod_eq_top (λ _ _, h) }
lemma pow_sup_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : (I ^ n) ⊔ J = ⊤ :=
by { rw [← finset.card_range n, ← finset.prod_const], exact prod_sup_eq_top (λ _ _, h) }
lemma pow_sup_pow_eq_top {m n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : (I ^ m) ⊔ (J ^ n) = ⊤ :=
sup_pow_eq_top (pow_sup_eq_top h)
variables (I)
@[simp] theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
submodule.smul_bot I
@[simp] theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ :=
submodule.bot_smul I
@[simp] theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ submodule.top_smul I
@[simp] theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
submodule.top_smul I
variables {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_right h
variables (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
submodule.sup_smul I J K
variables {I J K}
lemma pow_le_pow {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
I^n ≤ I^m :=
begin
cases nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with k hk,
rw [hk, pow_add],
exact le_trans (mul_le_inf) (inf_le_left)
end
lemma pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I^n ≤ I :=
calc I^n ≤ I ^ 1 : pow_le_pow (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
... = I : pow_one _
lemma pow_mono {I J : ideal R} (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n :=
begin
induction n,
{ rw [pow_zero, pow_zero], exact rfl.le },
{ rw [pow_succ, pow_succ], exact ideal.mul_mono e n_ih }
end
lemma mul_eq_bot {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [no_zero_divisors R] {I J : ideal R} :
I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨λ hij, or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr (λ I_ne_bot, J.eq_bot_iff.mpr (λ j hj,
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot in
or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0)),
λ h, by cases h; rw [← ideal.mul_bot, h, ideal.mul_comm]⟩
instance {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [no_zero_divisors R] : no_zero_divisors (ideal R) :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ I J, mul_eq_bot.1 }
/-- A product of ideals in an integral domain is zero if and only if one of the terms is zero. -/
lemma prod_eq_bot {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [is_domain R]
{s : multiset (ideal R)} : s.prod = ⊥ ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I = ⊥ :=
prod_zero_iff_exists_zero
/-- The radical of an ideal `I` consists of the elements `r` such that `r^n ∈ I` for some `n`. -/
def radical (I : ideal R) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := { r | ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I },
zero_mem' := ⟨1, (pow_one (0:R)).symm ▸ I.zero_mem⟩,
add_mem' := λ x y ⟨m, hxmi⟩ ⟨n, hyni⟩, ⟨m + n,
(add_pow x y (m + n)).symm ▸ I.sum_mem $
show ∀ c ∈ finset.range (nat.succ (m + n)),
x ^ c * y ^ (m + n - c) * (nat.choose (m + n) c) ∈ I,
from λ c hc, or.cases_on (le_total c m)
(λ hcm, I.mul_mem_right _ $ I.mul_mem_left _ $ nat.add_comm n m ▸
(add_tsub_assoc_of_le hcm n).symm ▸
(pow_add y n (m-c)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hyni)
(λ hmc, I.mul_mem_right _ $ I.mul_mem_right _ $ add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmc ▸
(pow_add x m (c-m)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hxmi)⟩,
smul_mem' := λ r s ⟨n, hsni⟩, ⟨n, (mul_pow r s n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_left (r^n) hsni⟩ }
theorem le_radical : I ≤ radical I :=
λ r hri, ⟨1, (pow_one r).symm ▸ hri⟩
variables (R)
theorem radical_top : (radical ⊤ : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 ⟨0, submodule.mem_top⟩
variables {R}
theorem radical_mono (H : I ≤ J) : radical I ≤ radical J :=
λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, H hrni⟩
variables (I)
@[simp] theorem radical_idem : radical (radical I) = radical I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, k, hrnki⟩, ⟨n * k, (pow_mul r n k).symm ▸ hrnki⟩) le_radical
variables {I}
theorem radical_le_radical_iff : radical I ≤ radical J ↔ I ≤ radical J :=
⟨λ h, le_trans le_radical h, λ h, radical_idem J ▸ radical_mono h⟩
theorem radical_eq_top : radical I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨λ h, (eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (eq_top_iff_one _).1 h in
@one_pow R _ n ▸ hn, λ h, h.symm ▸ radical_top R⟩
theorem is_prime.radical (H : is_prime I) : radical I = I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, H.mem_of_pow_mem n hrni) le_radical
variables (I J)
theorem radical_sup : radical (I ⊔ J) = radical (radical I ⊔ radical J) :=
le_antisymm (radical_mono $ sup_le_sup le_radical le_radical) $
λ r ⟨n, hrnij⟩, let ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrnij in
@radical_idem _ _ (I ⊔ J) ▸ ⟨n, hst ▸ ideal.add_mem _
(radical_mono le_sup_left hs) (radical_mono le_sup_right ht)⟩
theorem radical_inf : radical (I ⊓ J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (radical_mono inf_le_left) (radical_mono inf_le_right))
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hrm,
(pow_add r m n).symm ▸ J.mul_mem_left _ hrn⟩)
theorem radical_mul : radical (I * J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (radical_inf I J ▸ radical_mono $ @mul_le_inf _ _ I J)
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ mul_mem_mul hrm hrn⟩)
variables {I J}
theorem is_prime.radical_le_iff (hj : is_prime J) :
radical I ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨le_trans le_radical, λ hij r ⟨n, hrni⟩, hj.mem_of_pow_mem n $ hij hrni⟩
theorem radical_eq_Inf (I : ideal R) :
radical I = Inf { J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J } :=
le_antisymm (le_Inf $ λ J hJ, hJ.2.radical_le_iff.2 hJ.1) $
λ r hr, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hri,
let ⟨m, (hrm : r ∉ radical m), him, hm⟩ := zorn_nonempty_partial_order₀
{K : ideal R | r ∉ radical K}
(λ c hc hcc y hyc, ⟨Sup c, λ ⟨n, hrnc⟩, let ⟨y, hyc, hrny⟩ :=
(submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed ⟨y, hyc⟩ hcc.directed_on).1 hrnc in hc hyc ⟨n, hrny⟩,
λ z, le_Sup⟩) I hri in
have ∀ x ∉ m, r ∈ radical (m ⊔ span {x}) := λ x hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hrmx, hxm $
hm (m ⊔ span {x}) hrmx le_sup_left ▸ (le_sup_right : _ ≤ m ⊔ span {x})
(subset_span $ set.mem_singleton _),
have is_prime m, from ⟨by rintro rfl; rw radical_top at hrm; exact hrm trivial,
λ x y hxym, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hym,
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := this _ hxm,
⟨p, hpm, q, hq, hpqrn⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrn,
⟨c, hcxq⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq in
let ⟨k, hrk⟩ := this _ hym,
⟨f, hfm, g, hg, hfgrk⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrk,
⟨d, hdyg⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hg in
hrm ⟨n + k, by rw [pow_add, ← hpqrn, ← hcxq, ← hfgrk, ← hdyg, add_mul, mul_add (c*x),
mul_assoc c x (d*y), mul_left_comm x, ← mul_assoc];
refine m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_right _ hpm) (m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_left _ hfm)
(m.mul_mem_left _ hxym))⟩⟩,
hrm $ this.radical.symm ▸ (Inf_le ⟨him, this⟩ : Inf {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J} ≤ m) hr
@[simp] lemma radical_bot_of_is_domain {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R] [no_zero_divisors R] :
radical (⊥ : ideal R) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 (λ x hx, hx.rec_on (λ n hn, pow_eq_zero hn))
instance : comm_semiring (ideal R) := submodule.comm_semiring
variables (R)
theorem top_pow (n : ℕ) : (⊤ ^ n : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
nat.rec_on n one_eq_top $ λ n ih, by rw [pow_succ, ih, top_mul]
variables {R}
variables (I)
theorem radical_pow (n : ℕ) (H : n > 0) : radical (I^n) = radical I :=
nat.rec_on n (not.elim dec_trivial) (λ n ih H,
or.cases_on (lt_or_eq_of_le $ nat.le_of_lt_succ H)
(λ H, calc radical (I^(n+1))
= radical I ⊓ radical (I^n) : by { rw pow_succ, exact radical_mul _ _ }
... = radical I ⊓ radical I : by rw ih H
... = radical I : inf_idem)
(λ H, H ▸ (pow_one I).symm ▸ rfl)) H
theorem is_prime.mul_le {I J P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P) :
I * J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hip j hj, let ⟨i, hi, hip⟩ := set.not_subset.1 hip in
(hp.mem_or_mem $ h $ mul_mem_mul hi hj).resolve_left hip,
λ h, or.cases_on h (le_trans $ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_left)
(le_trans $ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_right)⟩
theorem is_prime.inf_le {I J P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P) :
I ⊓ J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, hp.mul_le.1 $ le_trans mul_le_inf h,
λ h, or.cases_on h (le_trans inf_le_left) (le_trans inf_le_right)⟩
theorem is_prime.multiset_prod_le {s : multiset (ideal R)} {P : ideal R}
(hp : is_prime P) (hne : s ≠ 0) :
s.prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I ≤ P :=
suffices s.prod ≤ P → ∃ I ∈ s, I ≤ P,
from ⟨this, λ ⟨i, his, hip⟩, le_trans multiset_prod_le_inf $
le_trans (multiset.inf_le his) hip⟩,
begin
classical,
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b, b ∈ s := multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero hne,
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, s = b ::ₘ t,
from ⟨s.erase b, (multiset.cons_erase hb).symm⟩,
refine t.induction_on _ _,
{ simp only [exists_prop, ←multiset.singleton_eq_cons, multiset.prod_singleton,
multiset.mem_singleton, exists_eq_left, imp_self] },
intros a s ih h,
rw [multiset.cons_swap, multiset.prod_cons, hp.mul_le] at h,
rw multiset.cons_swap,
cases h,
{ exact ⟨a, multiset.mem_cons_self a _, h⟩ },
obtain ⟨I, hI, ih⟩ : ∃ I ∈ b ::ₘ s, I ≤ P := ih h,
exact ⟨I, multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hI, ih⟩
end
theorem is_prime.multiset_prod_map_le {s : multiset ι} (f : ι → ideal R) {P : ideal R}
(hp : is_prime P) (hne : s ≠ 0) :
(s.map f).prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
begin
rw hp.multiset_prod_le (mt multiset.map_eq_zero.mp hne),
simp_rw [exists_prop, multiset.mem_map, exists_exists_and_eq_and],
end
theorem is_prime.prod_le {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {P : ideal R}
(hp : is_prime P) (hne : s.nonempty) :
s.prod f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
hp.multiset_prod_map_le f (mt finset.val_eq_zero.mp hne.ne_empty)
theorem is_prime.inf_le' {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P)
(hsne: s.nonempty) :
s.inf f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, (hp.prod_le hsne).1 $ le_trans prod_le_inf h,
λ ⟨i, his, hip⟩, le_trans (finset.inf_le his) hip⟩
theorem subset_union {R : Type u} [ring R] {I J K : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ J ∪ K ↔ I ≤ J ∨ I ≤ K :=
⟨λ h, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hij s hsi,
let ⟨r, hri, hrj⟩ := set.not_subset.1 hij in classical.by_contradiction $ λ hsk,
or.cases_on (h $ I.add_mem hri hsi)
(λ hj, hrj $ add_sub_cancel r s ▸ J.sub_mem hj ((h hsi).resolve_right hsk))
(λ hk, hsk $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ K.sub_mem hk ((h hri).resolve_left hrj)),
λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset_union_left J K)
(λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset_union_right J K)⟩
theorem subset_union_prime' {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {a b : ι}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, is_prime (f i)) {I : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) ↔ I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) →
I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i,
from ⟨this, λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset.trans
(set.subset_union_left _ _) (set.subset_union_left _ _)) $
λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset.trans
(set.subset_union_right _ _) (set.subset_union_left _ _)) $
λ ⟨i, his, hi⟩, by refine (set.subset.trans hi $ set.subset.trans _ $
set.subset_union_right _ _);
exact set.subset_bUnion_of_mem (finset.mem_coe.2 his)⟩,
begin
generalize hn : s.card = n, intros h,
unfreezingI { induction n with n ih generalizing a b s },
{ clear hp,
rw finset.card_eq_zero at hn, subst hn,
rw [finset.coe_empty, set.bUnion_empty, set.union_empty, subset_union] at h,
simpa only [exists_prop, finset.not_mem_empty, false_and, exists_false, or_false] },
classical,
replace hn : ∃ (i : ι) (t : finset ι), i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s ∧ t.card = n :=
finset.card_eq_succ.1 hn,
unfreezingI { rcases hn with ⟨i, t, hit, rfl, hn⟩ },
replace hp : is_prime (f i) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, is_prime (f x) := (t.forall_mem_insert _ _).1 hp,
by_cases Ht : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i,
{ obtain ⟨j, hjt, hfji⟩ : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i := Ht,
obtain ⟨u, hju, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, j ∉ u ∧ insert j u = t,
{ exact ⟨t.erase j, t.not_mem_erase j, finset.insert_erase hjt⟩ },
have hp' : ∀ k ∈ insert i u, is_prime (f k),
{ rw finset.forall_mem_insert at hp ⊢, exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.2⟩ },
have hiu : i ∉ u := mt finset.mem_insert_of_mem hit,
have hn' : (insert i u).card = n,
{ rwa finset.card_insert_of_not_mem at hn ⊢, exacts [hiu, hju] },
have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ k ∈ (↑(insert i u) : set ι), f k),
{ rw finset.coe_insert at h ⊢, rw finset.coe_insert at h,
simp only [set.bUnion_insert] at h ⊢,
rw [← set.union_assoc ↑(f i)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right hfji] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih a b (insert i u) hp' hn' h',
refine ih.imp id (or.imp id (exists_imp_exists $ λ k, _)), simp only [exists_prop],
exact and.imp (λ hk, finset.insert_subset_insert i (finset.subset_insert j u) hk) id },
by_cases Ha : f a ≤ f i,
{ have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f i ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j),
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_assoc,
set.union_right_comm ↑(f a)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Ha] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih i b t hp.2 hn h', right,
rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩ },
{ exact or.inl ih },
{ exact or.inr ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩ } },
by_cases Hb : f b ≤ f i,
{ have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f i ∪ (⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j),
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_assoc, set.union_assoc ↑(f a)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Hb] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih a i t hp.2 hn h',
rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ exact or.inl ih },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩) } },
by_cases Hi : I ≤ f i,
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, Hi⟩) },
have : ¬I ⊓ f a ⊓ f b ⊓ t.inf f ≤ f i,
{ rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hsne),
{ rw [finset.inf_empty, inf_top_eq, hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le, not_or_distrib, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩ },
simp only [hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le' hsne, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩, Ht⟩ },
rcases set.not_subset.1 this with ⟨r, ⟨⟨⟨hrI, hra⟩, hrb⟩, hr⟩, hri⟩,
by_cases HI : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j,
{ specialize ih hp.2 hn HI, rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ left, exact ih }, { right, left, exact ih },
{ right, right, exact ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩ } },
exfalso, rcases set.not_subset.1 HI with ⟨s, hsI, hs⟩,
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert] at h,
have hsi : s ∈ f i := ((h hsI).resolve_left (mt or.inl hs)).resolve_right (mt or.inr hs),
rcases h (I.add_mem hrI hsI) with ⟨ha | hb⟩ | hi | ht,
{ exact hs (or.inl $ or.inl $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f a).sub_mem ha hra) },
{ exact hs (or.inl $ or.inr $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f b).sub_mem hb hrb) },
{ exact hri (add_sub_cancel r s ▸ (f i).sub_mem hi hsi) },
{ rw set.mem_Union₂ at ht, rcases ht with ⟨j, hjt, hj⟩,
simp only [finset.inf_eq_infi, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_infi] at hr,
exact hs (or.inr $ set.mem_bUnion hjt $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f j).sub_mem hj $ hr j hjt) }
end
/-- Prime avoidance. Atiyah-Macdonald 1.11, Eisenbud 3.3, Stacks 00DS, Matsumura Ex.1.6. -/
theorem subset_union_prime {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} (a b : ι)
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ a → i ≠ b → is_prime (f i)) {I : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices (I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) → ∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ I ≤ f i,
from ⟨λ h, bex_def.2 $ this h, λ ⟨i, his, hi⟩, set.subset.trans hi $ set.subset_bUnion_of_mem $
show i ∈ (↑s : set ι), from his⟩,
assume h : (I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i),
begin
classical,
by_cases has : a ∈ s,
{ unfreezingI { obtain ⟨t, hat, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s :=
⟨s.erase a, finset.not_mem_erase a s, finset.insert_erase has⟩ },
by_cases hbt : b ∈ t,
{ unfreezingI { obtain ⟨u, hbu, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, b ∉ u ∧ insert b u = t :=
⟨t.erase b, finset.not_mem_erase b t, finset.insert_erase hbt⟩ },
have hp' : ∀ i ∈ u, is_prime (f i),
{ intros i hiu, refine hp i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hiu)) _ _;
unfreezingI { rintro rfl }; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, set.bUnion_insert,
← set.union_assoc, subset_union_prime' hp', bex_def] at h,
rwa [finset.exists_mem_insert, finset.exists_mem_insert] },
{ have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
unfreezingI { rintro rfl }; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f a : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert } },
{ by_cases hbs : b ∈ s,
{ unfreezingI { obtain ⟨t, hbt, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, b ∉ t ∧ insert b t = s :=
⟨s.erase b, finset.not_mem_erase b s, finset.insert_erase hbs⟩ },
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
unfreezingI { rintro rfl }; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f b : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert },
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hse hsne,
{ substI hse, rw [finset.coe_empty, set.bUnion_empty, set.subset_empty_iff] at h,
have : (I : set R) ≠ ∅ := set.nonempty.ne_empty (set.nonempty_of_mem I.zero_mem),
exact absurd h this },
{ cases hsne.bex with i his,
unfreezingI { obtain ⟨t, hit, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s :=
⟨s.erase i, finset.not_mem_erase i s, finset.insert_erase his⟩ },
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
unfreezingI { rintro rfl }; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f i : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert } }
end
section dvd
/-- If `I` divides `J`, then `I` contains `J`.
In a Dedekind domain, to divide and contain are equivalent, see `ideal.dvd_iff_le`.
-/
lemma le_of_dvd {I J : ideal R} : I ∣ J → J ≤ I
| ⟨K, h⟩ := h.symm ▸ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_left
lemma is_unit_iff {I : ideal R} :
is_unit I ↔ I = ⊤ :=
is_unit_iff_dvd_one.trans ((@one_eq_top R _).symm ▸
⟨λ h, eq_top_iff.mpr (ideal.le_of_dvd h), λ h, ⟨⊤, by rw [mul_top, h]⟩⟩)
instance unique_units : unique ((ideal R)ˣ) :=
{ default := 1,
uniq := λ u, units.ext
(show (u : ideal R) = 1, by rw [is_unit_iff.mp u.is_unit, one_eq_top]) }
end dvd
end mul_and_radical
section map_and_comap
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section semiring
variables {F : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S]
variables [rc : ring_hom_class F R S]
variables (f : F)
variables {I J : ideal R} {K L : ideal S}
include rc
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : ideal R) : ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap (I : ideal S) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := f ⁻¹' I,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy, by simp only [set.mem_preimage, set_like.mem_coe,
map_add, add_mem hx hy] at *,
zero_mem' := by simp only [set.mem_preimage, map_zero, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.zero_mem],
smul_mem' := λ c x hx, by { simp only [smul_eq_mul, set.mem_preimage, map_mul,
set_like.mem_coe] at *,
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx } }
variables {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono $ set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
lemma apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap :
map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans set.image_subset_iff
@[simp] theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K := iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
set.preimage_mono (λ x hx, h hx)
variables (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 $ by rw [mem_comap, map_one];
exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
variables {G : Type*} [rcg : ring_hom_class G S R]
include rcg
lemma map_le_comap_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : ideal R) (hf : set.left_inv_on g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
begin
refine ideal.span_le.2 _,
rintros x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
rw [set_like.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx],
exact hx,
end
lemma comap_le_map_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : ideal S) (hf : set.left_inv_on g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
λ x (hx : f x ∈ I), hf hx ▸ ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `ideal` version of `set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
lemma map_le_comap_of_inverse (g : G) (I : ideal R) (h : function.left_inverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ $ h.left_inv_on _
/-- The `ideal` version of `set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
lemma comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : ideal S) (h : function.left_inverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ $ h.left_inv_on _
omit rcg
instance is_prime.comap [hK : K.is_prime] : (comap f K).is_prime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, λ x y,
by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variables (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
variable (f)
lemma gc_map_comap : galois_connection (ideal.map f) (ideal.comap f) :=
λ I J, ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
omit rc
@[simp] lemma comap_id : I.comap (ring_hom.id R) = I :=
ideal.ext $ λ _, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_id : I.map (ring_hom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (ring_hom.id R)).l_unique galois_connection.id comap_id
lemma comap_comap {T : Type*} [semiring T] {I : ideal T} (f : R →+* S)
(g : S →+* T) : (I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) := rfl
lemma map_map {T : Type*} [semiring T] {I : ideal R} (f : R →+* S)
(g : S →+* T) : (I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique
(gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) (λ _, comap_comap _ _)
include rc
lemma map_span (f : F) (s : set R) :
map f (span s) = span (f '' s) :=
symm $ submodule.span_eq_of_le _
(λ y ⟨x, hy, x_eq⟩, x_eq ▸ mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hy))
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ span_le.2 $ set.image_subset_iff.1 subset_span)
variables {f I J K L}
lemma map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
lemma le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
lemma le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
lemma map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp] lemma comap_top : (⊤ : ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp] lemma comap_eq_top_iff {I : ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨ λ h, I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
λ h, by rw [h, comap_top] ⟩
@[simp] lemma map_bot : (⊥ : ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
variables (f I J K L)
@[simp] lemma map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp] lemma comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
lemma map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L := rfl
variables {ι : Sort*}
lemma map_supr (K : ι → ideal R) : (supr K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)).l_supr
lemma comap_infi (K : ι → ideal S) : (infi K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)).u_infi
lemma map_Sup (s : set (ideal R)): (Sup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)).l_Sup
lemma comap_Inf (s : set (ideal S)): (Inf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)).u_Inf
lemma comap_Inf' (s : set (ideal S)) : (Inf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ (comap f '' s), I :=
trans (comap_Inf f s) (by rw infi_image)
theorem comap_is_prime [H : is_prime K] : is_prime (comap f K) :=
⟨comap_ne_top f H.ne_top,
λ x y h, H.mem_or_mem $ by rwa [mem_comap, map_mul] at h⟩
variables {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : galois_connection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
omit rc
@[simp] lemma smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [algebra R S]
(I : ideal R) : I • (⊤ : submodule R S) = (I.map (algebra_map R S)).restrict_scalars R :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (submodule.smul_le.mpr (λ r hr y _, _) )
(λ x hx, submodule.span_induction hx _ _ _ _),
{ rw algebra.smul_def,
exact mul_mem_right _ _ (mem_map_of_mem _ hr) },
{ rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
rw [← mul_one (algebra_map R S x), ← algebra.smul_def],
exact submodule.smul_mem_smul hx submodule.mem_top },
{ exact submodule.zero_mem _ },
{ intros x y, exact submodule.add_mem _ },
intros a x hx,
refine submodule.smul_induction_on hx _ _,
{ intros r hr s hs,
rw smul_comm,
exact submodule.smul_mem_smul hr submodule.mem_top },
{ intros x y hx hy,
rw smul_add, exact submodule.add_mem _ hx hy },
end
section surjective
variables (hf : function.surjective f)
include hf
open function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : ideal S) :
map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl)
(λ s hsi, let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s in
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f $ show f r ∈ I, from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi))
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def gi_map_comap : galois_insertion (map f) (comap f) :=
galois_insertion.monotone_intro
((gc_map_comap f).monotone_u)
((gc_map_comap f).monotone_l)
(λ _, le_comap_map)
(map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
lemma map_surjective_of_surjective : surjective (map f) :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_surjective
lemma comap_injective_of_surjective : injective (comap f) :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).u_injective
lemma map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
lemma map_supr_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → ideal S) : (⨆i, (K i).comap f).map f = supr K :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_supr_u _
lemma map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
lemma map_infi_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → ideal S) : (⨅i, (K i).comap f).map f = infi K :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_infi_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : ideal R} {y}
(H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
submodule.span_induction H (λ _, id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(λ y1 y2 ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩,
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
(λ c y ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩,
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c in ⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩)
lemma mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : ideal R} {y} :
y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨λ h, (set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h),
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, hx.right ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f hx.left)⟩
lemma le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I :=
λ h, (map_comap_of_surjective f hf K) ▸ map_mono h
end surjective
section injective
variables (hf : function.injective f)
include hf
lemma comap_bot_le_of_injective : comap f ⊥ ≤ I :=
begin
refine le_trans (λ x hx, _) bot_le,
rw [mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx,
exact eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ (submodule.zero_mem ⊥)
end
end injective
end semiring
section ring
variables {F : Type*} [ring R] [ring S]
variables [ring_hom_class F R S] (f : F) {I : ideal R}
section surjective
variables (hf : function.surjective f)
include hf
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (I : ideal R) : comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (assume r h, let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h in
submodule.mem_sup.2 ⟨s, hsi, r - s, (submodule.mem_bot S).2 $ by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel'_right s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def rel_iso_of_surjective : ideal S ≃o { p : ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } :=
{ to_fun := λ J, ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩,
inv_fun := λ I, map f I.1,
left_inv := λ J, map_comap_of_surjective f hf J,
right_inv := λ I, subtype.eq $ show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1,
from (comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm
(sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left,
map_rel_iff' := λ I1 I2, ⟨λ H, map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸
map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H, comap_mono⟩ }
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def order_embedding_of_surjective : ideal S ↪o ideal R :=
(rel_iso_of_surjective f hf).to_rel_embedding.trans (subtype.rel_embedding _ _)
theorem map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective {I : ideal R} (H : is_maximal I) :
(map f I) = ⊤ ∨ is_maximal (map f I) :=
begin
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (λ ne_top, ⟨⟨λ h, ne_top h, λ J hJ, _⟩⟩),
{ refine (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf).injective
(subtype.ext_iff.2 (eq.trans (H.1.2 (comap f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne _ _)) comap_top.symm)),
{ exact (map_le_iff_le_comap).1 (le_of_lt hJ) },
{ exact λ h, hJ.right (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf (le_of_eq h.symm)) } }
end
theorem comap_is_maximal_of_surjective {K : ideal S} [H : is_maximal K] : is_maximal (comap f K) :=
begin
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, λ J hJ, _⟩⟩,
suffices : map f J = ⊤,
{ replace this := congr_arg (comap f) this,
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this,
rw eq_top_iff,
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono (bot_le)) (le_of_lt hJ))) },
refine H.1.2 (map f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ))
(λ h, ne_of_lt hJ (trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) _))),
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left],
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (I J : ideal S) : comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨λ h, (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h),
λ h, le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
end surjective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `map f (map f.symm) = I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma map_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : (I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I :=
by simp [← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, map_map]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `comap f.symm (comap f) = I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma comap_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I :=
by simp [← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, comap_comap]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
lemma map_comap_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (le_comap_of_map_le (map_of_equiv I f).le)
(le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ f.surjective (comap_of_equiv I f).le)
section bijective
variables (hf : function.bijective f)
include hf
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def rel_iso_of_bijective : ideal S ≃o ideal R :=
{ to_fun := comap f,
inv_fun := map f,
left_inv := (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).left_inv,
right_inv := λ J, subtype.ext_iff.1
((rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).right_inv ⟨J, comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf.left⟩),
map_rel_iff' := (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).map_rel_iff' }
lemma comap_le_iff_le_map {I : ideal R} {K : ideal S} : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨λ h, le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h,
λ h, ((rel_iso_of_bijective f hf).right_inv I) ▸ comap_mono h⟩
theorem map.is_maximal {I : ideal R} (H : is_maximal I) : is_maximal (map f I) :=
by refine or_iff_not_imp_left.1
(map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective f hf.right H) (λ h, H.1.1 _);
calc I = comap f (map f I) : ((rel_iso_of_bijective f hf).right_inv I).symm
... = comap f ⊤ : by rw h
... = ⊤ : by rw comap_top
end bijective
lemma ring_equiv.bot_maximal_iff (e : R ≃+* S) :
(⊥ : ideal R).is_maximal ↔ (⊥ : ideal S).is_maximal :=
⟨λ h, (@map_bot _ _ _ _ _ _ e.to_ring_hom) ▸ map.is_maximal e.to_ring_hom e.bijective h,
λ h, (@map_bot _ _ _ _ _ _ e.symm.to_ring_hom) ▸ map.is_maximal e.symm.to_ring_hom
e.symm.bijective h⟩
end ring
section comm_ring
variables {F : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
variables [rc : ring_hom_class F R S]
variables (f : F)
variables {I J : ideal R} {K L : ideal S}
variables (I J K L)
include rc
theorem map_mul : map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj,
show f (r * s) ∈ _, by rw map_mul;
exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(trans_rel_right _ (span_mul_span _ _) $ span_le.2 $
set.Union₂_subset $ λ i ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩,
set.Union₂_subset $ λ j ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩,
set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ hfri ▸ hfsj ▸
by rw [← map_mul];
exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj))
/-- The pushforward `ideal.map` as a monoid-with-zero homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def map_hom : ideal R →*₀ ideal S :=
{ to_fun := map f,
map_mul' := λ I J, ideal.map_mul f I J,
map_one' := by convert ideal.map_top f; exact one_eq_top,
map_zero' := ideal.map_bot }
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I^n) = (map f I)^n :=
map_pow (map_hom f) I n
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, show f (r ^ n) ∈ K,
from (map_pow f r n).symm ▸ hfrnk⟩)
(λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ hfrnk⟩)
omit rc
@[simp] lemma map_quotient_self :
map (quotient.mk I) I = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ x hx,
(submodule.mem_bot (R ⧸ I)).2 $ ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 hx
variables {I J K L}
include rc
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ (map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_rfl)
lemma le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) :
(K.comap f) ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f :=
begin
induction n,
{ rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, ideal.one_eq_top, ideal.one_eq_top], exact rfl.le },
{ rw [pow_succ, pow_succ], exact (ideal.mul_mono_right n_ih).trans (ideal.le_comap_mul f) }
end
omit rc
end comm_ring
end map_and_comap
section is_primary
variables {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R]
/-- A proper ideal `I` is primary iff `xy ∈ I` implies `x ∈ I` or `y ∈ radical I`. -/
def is_primary (I : ideal R) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ {x y : R}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ radical I
theorem is_prime.is_primary {I : ideal R} (hi : is_prime I) : is_primary I :=
⟨hi.1, λ x y hxy, (hi.mem_or_mem hxy).imp id $ λ hyi, le_radical hyi⟩
theorem mem_radical_of_pow_mem {I : ideal R} {x : R} {m : ℕ} (hx : x ^ m ∈ radical I) :
x ∈ radical I :=
radical_idem I ▸ ⟨m, hx⟩
theorem is_prime_radical {I : ideal R} (hi : is_primary I) : is_prime (radical I) :=
⟨mt radical_eq_top.1 hi.1, λ x y ⟨m, hxy⟩, begin
rw mul_pow at hxy, cases hi.2 hxy,
{ exact or.inl ⟨m, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inr (mem_radical_of_pow_mem h) }
end⟩
theorem is_primary_inf {I J : ideal R} (hi : is_primary I) (hj : is_primary J)
(hij : radical I = radical J) : is_primary (I ⊓ J) :=
⟨ne_of_lt $ lt_of_le_of_lt inf_le_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hi.1), λ x y ⟨hxyi, hxyj⟩,
begin
rw [radical_inf, hij, inf_idem],
cases hi.2 hxyi with hxi hyi, cases hj.2 hxyj with hxj hyj,
{ exact or.inl ⟨hxi, hxj⟩ },
{ exact or.inr hyj },
{ rw hij at hyi, exact or.inr hyi }
end⟩
end is_primary
section total
variables (ι : Type*)
variables (M : Type*) [add_comm_group M] {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [module R M] (I : ideal R)
variables (v : ι → M) (hv : submodule.span R (set.range v) = ⊤)
open_locale big_operators
/-- A variant of `finsupp.total` that takes in vectors valued in `I`. -/
noncomputable
def finsupp_total : (ι →₀ I) →ₗ[R] M :=
(finsupp.total ι M R v).comp (finsupp.map_range.linear_map I.subtype)
variables {ι M v}
lemma finsupp_total_apply (f : ι →₀ I) :
finsupp_total ι M I v f = f.sum (λ i x, (x : R) • v i) :=
begin
dsimp [finsupp_total],
rw [finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum_map_range_index],
exact λ _, zero_smul _ _
end
lemma finsupp_total_apply_eq_of_fintype [fintype ι] (f : ι →₀ I) :
finsupp_total ι M I v f = ∑ i, (f i : R) • v i :=
by { rw [finsupp_total_apply, finsupp.sum_fintype], exact λ _, zero_smul _ _ }
lemma range_finsupp_total :
(finsupp_total ι M I v).range = I • (submodule.span R (set.range v)) :=
begin
ext,
rw submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum,
refine ⟨λ ⟨f, h⟩, ⟨finsupp.map_range.linear_map I.subtype f, λ i, (f i).2, h⟩, _⟩,
rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
classical,
refine ⟨a.map_range (λ r, if h : r ∈ I then ⟨r, h⟩ else 0) (by split_ifs; refl), _⟩,
rw [finsupp_total_apply, finsupp.sum_map_range_index],
{ apply finsupp.sum_congr, intros i _, rw dif_pos (ha i), refl },
{ exact λ _, zero_smul _ _ },
end
end total
end ideal
lemma associates.mk_ne_zero' {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] {r : R} :
(associates.mk (ideal.span {r} : ideal R)) ≠ 0 ↔ (r ≠ 0):=
by rw [associates.mk_ne_zero, ideal.zero_eq_bot, ne.def, ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
namespace ring_hom
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type v}
section semiring
variables {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S] [semiring T]
variables [rcf : ring_hom_class F R S] [rcg : ring_hom_class G T S]
(f : F) (g : G)
include rcf
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : ideal R := ideal.comap f ⊥
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero.-/
lemma mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 :=
by rw [ker, ideal.mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot]
lemma ker_eq : ((ker f) : set R) = set.preimage f {0} := rfl
lemma ker_eq_comap_bot (f : F) : ker f = ideal.comap f ⊥ := rfl
omit rcf
lemma comap_ker (f : S →+* R) (g : T →+* S) : f.ker.comap g = (f.comp g).ker :=
by rw [ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot, ideal.comap_comap, ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
include rcf
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel.-/
lemma not_one_mem_ker [nontrivial S] (f : F) : (1:R) ∉ ker f :=
by { rw [mem_ker, map_one], exact one_ne_zero }
lemma ker_ne_top [nontrivial S] (f : F) : ker f ≠ ⊤ :=
(ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).mpr $ not_one_mem_ker f
omit rcf
end semiring
section ring
variables {F : Type*} [ring R] [semiring S] [rc : ring_hom_class F R S] (f : F)
include rc
lemma injective_iff_ker_eq_bot : function.injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ :=
by { rw [set_like.ext'_iff, ker_eq, set.ext_iff], exact injective_iff_map_eq_zero' f }
lemma ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 → x = 0 :=
by { rw [← injective_iff_map_eq_zero f, injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] }
omit rc
@[simp] lemma ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) :
ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ :=
by simpa only [←injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] using equiv_like.injective f
@[simp] lemma ker_equiv {F' : Type*} [ring_equiv_class F' R S] (f : F') :
ker f = ⊥ :=
by simpa only [←injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] using equiv_like.injective f
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse`) /
is surjective (`quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective`).
-/
def ker_lift (f : R →+* S) : R ⧸ f.ker →+* S :=
ideal.quotient.lift _ f $ λ r, f.mem_ker.mp
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_mk (f : R →+* S) (r : R) : ker_lift f (ideal.quotient.mk f.ker r) = f r :=
ideal.quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
lemma ker_lift_injective (f : R →+* S) : function.injective (ker_lift f) :=
assume a b, quotient.induction_on₂' a b $
assume a b (h : f a = f b), ideal.quotient.eq.2 $
show a - b ∈ ker f, by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, h, sub_self]
variable {f}
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings, computable version. -/
def quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse
{g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f) :
R ⧸ f.ker ≃+* S :=
{ to_fun := ker_lift f,
inv_fun := (ideal.quotient.mk f.ker) ∘ g,
left_inv := begin
rintro ⟨x⟩,
apply ker_lift_injective,
simp [hf (f x)],
end,
right_inv := hf,
..ker_lift f}
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply {g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f)
(x : R ⧸ f.ker) : quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse hf x = ker_lift f x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.symm.apply {g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f)
(x : S) : (quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse hf).symm x = ideal.quotient.mk f.ker (g x) := rfl
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings. -/
noncomputable def quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective (hf : function.surjective f) :
R ⧸ f.ker ≃+* S :=
quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse (classical.some_spec hf.has_right_inverse)
end comm_ring
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a domain is a prime ideal. -/
lemma ker_is_prime {F : Type*} [ring R] [ring S] [is_domain S] [ring_hom_class F R S]
(f : F) : (ker f).is_prime :=
⟨by { rw [ne.def, ideal.eq_top_iff_one], exact not_one_mem_ker f },
λ x y, by simpa only [mem_ker, map_mul] using @eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero S _ _ _ _ _⟩
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a field is a maximal ideal. -/
lemma ker_is_maximal_of_surjective {R K F : Type*} [ring R] [field K] [ring_hom_class F R K]
(f : F) (hf : function.surjective f) :
(ker f).is_maximal :=
begin
refine ideal.is_maximal_iff.mpr
⟨λ h1, @one_ne_zero K _ _ $ map_one f ▸ (mem_ker f).mp h1,
λ J x hJ hxf hxJ, _⟩,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf (f x)⁻¹,
have H : 1 = y * x - (y * x - 1) := (sub_sub_cancel _ _).symm,
rw H,
refine J.sub_mem (J.mul_mem_left _ hxJ) (hJ _),
rw mem_ker,
simp only [hy, map_sub, map_one, map_mul,
inv_mul_cancel (mt (mem_ker f).mpr hxf), sub_self],
end
end ring_hom
namespace ideal
variables {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {F : Type*}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] [semiring S] [rc : ring_hom_class F R S]
include rc
lemma map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker {I : ideal R} (f : F) : I.map f = ⊥ ↔ I ≤ (ring_hom.ker f) :=
by rw [ring_hom.ker, eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap]
lemma ker_le_comap {K : ideal S} (f : F) : ring_hom.ker f ≤ comap f K :=
λ x hx, mem_comap.2 (((ring_hom.mem_ker f).1 hx).symm ▸ K.zero_mem)
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [ring S] [rc : ring_hom_class F R S]
include rc
lemma map_Inf {A : set (ideal R)} {f : F} (hf : function.surjective f) :
(∀ J ∈ A, ring_hom.ker f ≤ J) → map f (Inf A) = Inf (map f '' A) :=
begin
refine λ h, le_antisymm (le_Inf _) _,
{ intros j hj y hy,
cases (mem_map_iff_of_surjective f hf).1 hy with x hx,
cases (set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hj with J hJ,
rw [← hJ.right, ← hx.right],
exact mem_map_of_mem f (Inf_le_of_le hJ.left (le_of_eq rfl) hx.left) },
{ intros y hy,
cases hf y with x hx,
refine hx ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f _),
have : ∀ I ∈ A, y ∈ map f I, by simpa using hy,
rw [submodule.mem_Inf],
intros J hJ,
rcases (mem_map_iff_of_surjective f hf).1 (this J hJ) with ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩,
have : x - x' ∈ J,
{ apply h J hJ,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, map_sub, hx, sub_self] },
simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using J.add_mem this hx' }
end
theorem map_is_prime_of_surjective {f : F} (hf : function.surjective f) {I : ideal R}
[H : is_prime I] (hk : ring_hom.ker f ≤ I) : is_prime (map f I) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, H.ne_top (eq_top_iff.2 _), λ x y, _⟩,
{ replace h := congr_arg (comap f) h,
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, comap_top] at h,
exact h ▸ sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) hk },
{ refine λ hxy, (hf x).rec_on (λ a ha, (hf y).rec_on (λ b hb, _)),
rw [← ha, ← hb, ← _root_.map_mul f, mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf] at hxy,
rcases hxy with ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub] at hc',
have : a * b ∈ I,
{ convert I.sub_mem hc (hk (hc' : c - a * b ∈ ring_hom.ker f)),
abel },
exact (H.mem_or_mem this).imp (λ h, ha ▸ mem_map_of_mem f h) (λ h, hb ▸ mem_map_of_mem f h) }
end
omit rc
theorem map_is_prime_of_equiv {F' : Type*} [ring_equiv_class F' R S]
(f : F') {I : ideal R} [is_prime I] :
is_prime (map f I) :=
map_is_prime_of_surjective (equiv_like.surjective f) $ by simp only [ring_hom.ker_equiv, bot_le]
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
@[simp] lemma mk_ker {I : ideal R} : (quotient.mk I).ker = I :=
by ext; rw [ring_hom.ker, mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
lemma map_mk_eq_bot_of_le {I J : ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) : I.map (J^.quotient.mk) = ⊥ :=
by { rw [map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker, mk_ker], exact h }
lemma ker_quotient_lift {S : Type v} [comm_ring S] {I : ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (H : I ≤ f.ker) :
(ideal.quotient.lift I f H).ker = (f.ker).map I^.quotient.mk :=
begin
ext x,
split,
{ intro hx,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective x,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ← hy, ideal.quotient.lift_mk, ← ring_hom.mem_ker] at hx,
rw [← hy, mem_map_iff_of_surjective I^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective],
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩ },
{ intro hx,
rw mem_map_iff_of_surjective I^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective at hx,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ← hy.right, ideal.quotient.lift_mk, ← (ring_hom.mem_ker f)],
exact hy.left },
end
theorem map_eq_iff_sup_ker_eq_of_surjective {I J : ideal R} (f : R →+* S)
(hf : function.surjective f) : map f I = map f J ↔ I ⊔ f.ker = J ⊔ f.ker :=
by rw [← (comap_injective_of_surjective f hf).eq_iff, comap_map_of_surjective f hf,
comap_map_of_surjective f hf, ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
theorem map_radical_of_surjective {f : R →+* S} (hf : function.surjective f) {I : ideal R}
(h : ring_hom.ker f ≤ I) : map f (I.radical) = (map f I).radical :=
begin
rw [radical_eq_Inf, radical_eq_Inf],
have : ∀ J ∈ {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ J.is_prime}, f.ker ≤ J := λ J hJ, le_trans h hJ.left,
convert map_Inf hf this,
refine funext (λ j, propext ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintros ⟨hj, hj'⟩,
haveI : j.is_prime := hj',
exact ⟨comap f j, ⟨⟨map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hj, comap_is_prime f j⟩,
map_comap_of_surjective f hf j⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨J, ⟨hJ, hJ'⟩⟩,
haveI : J.is_prime := hJ.right,
refine ⟨hJ' ▸ map_mono hJ.left, hJ' ▸ map_is_prime_of_surjective hf (le_trans h hJ.left)⟩ },
end
@[simp] lemma bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff (I : ideal R) :
(⊥ : ideal (R ⧸ I)).is_maximal ↔ I.is_maximal :=
⟨λ hI, (@mk_ker _ _ I) ▸
@comap_is_maximal_of_surjective _ _ _ _ _ _ (quotient.mk I) quotient.mk_surjective ⊥ hI,
λ hI, @bot_is_maximal _ (@field.to_division_ring _ (@quotient.field _ _ I hI)) ⟩
/-- See also `ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem` in case `I ≤ J`. -/
@[simp]
lemma mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup {I J : ideal R} {x : R} :
quotient.mk I x ∈ J.map (quotient.mk I) ↔ x ∈ J ⊔ I :=
by rw [← mem_comap, comap_map_of_surjective (quotient.mk I) quotient.mk_surjective,
← ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot, mk_ker]
/-- See also `ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup` if the assumption `I ≤ J` is not available. -/
lemma mem_quotient_iff_mem {I J : ideal R} (hIJ : I ≤ J) {x : R} :
quotient.mk I x ∈ J.map (quotient.mk I) ↔ x ∈ J :=
by rw [mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup, sup_eq_left.mpr hIJ]
section quotient_algebra
variables (R₁ R₂ : Type*) {A B : Type*}
variables [comm_semiring R₁] [comm_semiring R₂] [comm_ring A] [comm_ring B]
variables [algebra R₁ A] [algebra R₂ A] [algebra R₁ B]
/-- The `R₁`-algebra structure on `A/I` for an `R₁`-algebra `A` -/
instance quotient.algebra {I : ideal A} : algebra R₁ (A ⧸ I) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ideal.quotient.mk I (algebra_map R₁ A x),
smul := (•),
smul_def' := λ r x, quotient.induction_on' x $ λ x,
((quotient.mk I).congr_arg $ algebra.smul_def _ _).trans (ring_hom.map_mul _ _ _),
commutes' := λ _ _, mul_comm _ _,
.. ring_hom.comp (ideal.quotient.mk I) (algebra_map R₁ A) }
-- Lean can struggle to find this instance later if we don't provide this shortcut
instance quotient.is_scalar_tower [has_smul R₁ R₂] [is_scalar_tower R₁ R₂ A] (I : ideal A) :
is_scalar_tower R₁ R₂ (A ⧸ I) :=
by apply_instance
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R₁] A ⧸ I` as morphism of `R₁`-algebras, for `I` an ideal of
`A`, where `A` is an `R₁`-algebra. -/
def quotient.mkₐ (I : ideal A) : A →ₐ[R₁] A ⧸ I :=
⟨λ a, submodule.quotient.mk a, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, λ _, rfl⟩
lemma quotient.alg_map_eq (I : ideal A) :
algebra_map R₁ (A ⧸ I) = (algebra_map A (A ⧸ I)).comp (algebra_map R₁ A) :=
rfl
lemma quotient.mkₐ_to_ring_hom (I : ideal A) :
(quotient.mkₐ R₁ I).to_ring_hom = ideal.quotient.mk I := rfl
@[simp] lemma quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk (I : ideal A) :
⇑(quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) = ideal.quotient.mk I := rfl
@[simp] lemma quotient.algebra_map_eq (I : ideal R) :
algebra_map R (R ⧸ I) = I^.quotient.mk :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma quotient.mk_comp_algebra_map (I : ideal A) :
(quotient.mk I).comp (algebra_map R₁ A) = algebra_map R₁ (A ⧸ I) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma quotient.mk_algebra_map (I : ideal A) (x : R₁) :
quotient.mk I (algebra_map R₁ A x) = algebra_map R₁ (A ⧸ I) x :=
rfl
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R₁] I.quotient` is surjective. -/
lemma quotient.mkₐ_surjective (I : ideal A) : function.surjective (quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) :=
surjective_quot_mk _
/-- The kernel of `A →ₐ[R₁] I.quotient` is `I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma quotient.mkₐ_ker (I : ideal A) : (quotient.mkₐ R₁ I : A →+* A ⧸ I).ker = I :=
ideal.mk_ker
variables {R₁}
/-- `ideal.quotient.lift` as an `alg_hom`. -/
def quotient.liftₐ (I : ideal A) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hI : ∀ (a : A), a ∈ I → f a = 0) :
A ⧸ I →ₐ[R₁] B :=
{ commutes' := λ r, begin
-- this is is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply R₁ A (A ⧸ I) but the file `algebra.algebra.tower`
-- imports this file.
have : algebra_map R₁ (A ⧸ I) r = algebra_map A (A ⧸ I) (algebra_map R₁ A r),
{ simp_rw [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul] },
rw [this, ideal.quotient.algebra_map_eq,
ring_hom.to_fun_eq_coe, ideal.quotient.lift_mk, alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom,
algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, map_smul, map_one],
end
..(ideal.quotient.lift I (f : A →+* B) hI) }
@[simp]
lemma quotient.liftₐ_apply (I : ideal A) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hI : ∀ (a : A), a ∈ I → f a = 0) (x) :
ideal.quotient.liftₐ I f hI x = ideal.quotient.lift I (f : A →+* B) hI x :=
rfl
lemma quotient.liftₐ_comp (I : ideal A) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hI : ∀ (a : A), a ∈ I → f a = 0) :
(ideal.quotient.liftₐ I f hI).comp (ideal.quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) = f :=
alg_hom.ext (λ x, (ideal.quotient.lift_mk I (f : A →+* B) hI : _))
lemma ker_lift.map_smul (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (r : R₁) (x : A ⧸ f.to_ring_hom.ker) :
f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift (r • x) = r • f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift x :=
begin
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := quotient.mkₐ_surjective R₁ _ x,
rw [← alg_hom.map_smul, quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, ring_hom.ker_lift_mk],
exact f.map_smul _ _
end
/-- The induced algebras morphism from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse`) /
is surjective (`quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_surjective`).
-/
def ker_lift_alg (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) : (A ⧸ f.to_ring_hom.ker) →ₐ[R₁] B :=
alg_hom.mk' f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift (λ _ _, ker_lift.map_smul f _ _)
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_alg_mk (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (a : A) :
ker_lift_alg f (quotient.mk f.to_ring_hom.ker a) = f a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_alg_to_ring_hom (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) :
(ker_lift_alg f).to_ring_hom = ring_hom.ker_lift f := rfl
/-- The induced algebra morphism from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
lemma ker_lift_alg_injective (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) : function.injective (ker_lift_alg f) :=
ring_hom.ker_lift_injective f
/-- The **first isomorphism** theorem for algebras, computable version. -/
def quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse
{f : A →ₐ[R₁] B} {g : B → A} (hf : function.right_inverse g f) :
(A ⧸ f.to_ring_hom.ker) ≃ₐ[R₁] B :=
{ ..ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse (λ x, show f.to_ring_hom (g x) = x, from hf x),
..ker_lift_alg f}
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply {f : A →ₐ[R₁] B} {g : B → A}
(hf : function.right_inverse g f) (x : A ⧸ f.to_ring_hom.ker) :
quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse hf x = ker_lift_alg f x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse_symm.apply {f : A →ₐ[R₁] B} {g : B → A}
(hf : function.right_inverse g f) (x : B) :
(quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse hf).symm x = quotient.mkₐ R₁ f.to_ring_hom.ker (g x) :=
rfl
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for algebras. -/
noncomputable def quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_surjective
{f : A →ₐ[R₁] B} (hf : function.surjective f) : (A ⧸ f.to_ring_hom.ker) ≃ₐ[R₁] B :=
quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse (classical.some_spec hf.has_right_inverse)
/-- The ring hom `R/I →+* S/J` induced by a ring hom `f : R →+* S` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)` -/
def quotient_map {I : ideal R} (J : ideal S) (f : R →+* S) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) :
R ⧸ I →+* S ⧸ J :=
(quotient.lift I ((quotient.mk J).comp f) (λ _ ha,
by simpa [function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] using hIJ ha))
@[simp]
lemma quotient_map_mk {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
{x : R} : quotient_map I f H (quotient.mk J x) = quotient.mk I (f x) :=
quotient.lift_mk J _ _
@[simp]
lemma quotient_map_algebra_map {J : ideal A} {I : ideal S} {f : A →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
{x : R₁} :
quotient_map I f H (algebra_map R₁ (A ⧸ J) x) = quotient.mk I (f (algebra_map _ _ x)) :=
quotient.lift_mk J _ _
lemma quotient_map_comp_mk {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} (H : J ≤ I.comap f) :
(quotient_map I f H).comp (quotient.mk J) = (quotient.mk I).comp f :=
ring_hom.ext (λ x, by simp only [function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, ideal.quotient_map_mk])
/-- The ring equiv `R/I ≃+* S/J` induced by a ring equiv `f : R ≃+** S`, where `J = f(I)`. -/
@[simps]
def quotient_equiv (I : ideal R) (J : ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S)) :
R ⧸ I ≃+* S ⧸ J :=
{ inv_fun := quotient_map I ↑f.symm (by {rw hIJ, exact le_of_eq (map_comap_of_equiv I f)}),
left_inv := by {rintro ⟨r⟩, simp },
right_inv := by {rintro ⟨s⟩, simp },
..quotient_map J ↑f (by {rw hIJ, exact @le_comap_map _ S _ _ _ _ _ _}) }
@[simp]
lemma quotient_equiv_mk (I : ideal R) (J : ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S))
(x : R) : quotient_equiv I J f hIJ (ideal.quotient.mk I x) = ideal.quotient.mk J (f x) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotient_equiv_symm_mk (I : ideal R) (J : ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S)
(hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S)) (x : S) :
(quotient_equiv I J f hIJ).symm (ideal.quotient.mk J x) = ideal.quotient.mk I (f.symm x) := rfl
/-- `H` and `h` are kept as separate hypothesis since H is used in constructing the quotient map. -/
lemma quotient_map_injective' {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(h : I.comap f ≤ J) : function.injective (quotient_map I f H) :=
begin
refine (injective_iff_map_eq_zero (quotient_map I f H)).2 (λ a ha, _),
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective a,
rw [quotient_map_mk, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] at ha,
exact (quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem).mpr (h ha),
end
/-- If we take `J = I.comap f` then `quotient_map` is injective automatically. -/
lemma quotient_map_injective {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} :
function.injective (quotient_map I f le_rfl) :=
quotient_map_injective' le_rfl
lemma quotient_map_surjective {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(hf : function.surjective f) : function.surjective (quotient_map I f H) :=
λ x, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective x in
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x in ⟨(quotient.mk J) y, by simp [hx, hy]⟩
/-- Commutativity of a square is preserved when taking quotients by an ideal. -/
lemma comp_quotient_map_eq_of_comp_eq {R' S' : Type*} [comm_ring R'] [comm_ring S']
{f : R →+* S} {f' : R' →+* S'} {g : R →+* R'} {g' : S →+* S'} (hfg : f'.comp g = g'.comp f)
(I : ideal S') : (quotient_map I g' le_rfl).comp (quotient_map (I.comap g') f le_rfl) =
(quotient_map I f' le_rfl).comp (quotient_map (I.comap f') g
(le_of_eq (trans (comap_comap f g') (hfg ▸ (comap_comap g f'))))) :=
begin
refine ring_hom.ext (λ a, _),
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective a,
simp only [ring_hom.comp_apply, quotient_map_mk],
exact congr_arg (quotient.mk I) (trans (g'.comp_apply f r).symm (hfg ▸ (f'.comp_apply g r))),
end
/-- The algebra hom `A/I →+* B/J` induced by an algebra hom `f : A →ₐ[R₁] B` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)`. -/
def quotient_mapₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal B) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) :
A ⧸ I →ₐ[R₁] B ⧸ J :=
{ commutes' := λ r, by simp,
..quotient_map J (f : A →+* B) hIJ }
@[simp]
lemma quotient_map_mkₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal B) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (H : I ≤ J.comap f)
{x : A} : quotient_mapₐ J f H (quotient.mk I x) = quotient.mkₐ R₁ J (f x) := rfl
lemma quotient_map_comp_mkₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal B) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (H : I ≤ J.comap f) :
(quotient_mapₐ J f H).comp (quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) = (quotient.mkₐ R₁ J).comp f :=
alg_hom.ext (λ x, by simp only [quotient_map_mkₐ, quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, alg_hom.comp_apply])
/-- The algebra equiv `A/I ≃ₐ[R] B/J` induced by an algebra equiv `f : A ≃ₐ[R] B`,
where`J = f(I)`. -/
def quotient_equiv_alg (I : ideal A) (J : ideal B) (f : A ≃ₐ[R₁] B)
(hIJ : J = I.map (f : A →+* B)) :
(A ⧸ I) ≃ₐ[R₁] B ⧸ J :=
{ commutes' := λ r, by simp,
..quotient_equiv I J (f : A ≃+* B) hIJ }
@[priority 100]
instance quotient_algebra {I : ideal A} [algebra R A] :
algebra (R ⧸ I.comap (algebra_map R A)) (A ⧸ I) :=
(quotient_map I (algebra_map R A) (le_of_eq rfl)).to_algebra
lemma algebra_map_quotient_injective {I : ideal A} [algebra R A]:
function.injective (algebra_map (R ⧸ I.comap (algebra_map R A)) (A ⧸ I)) :=
begin
rintros ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ hab,
replace hab := quotient.eq.mp hab,
rw ← ring_hom.map_sub at hab,
exact quotient.eq.mpr hab
end
end quotient_algebra
end comm_ring
end ideal
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
-- TODO: show `[algebra R A] : algebra (ideal R) A` too
instance module_submodule : module (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
{ smul_add := smul_sup,
add_smul := sup_smul,
mul_smul := submodule.smul_assoc,
one_smul := by simp,
zero_smul := bot_smul,
smul_zero := smul_bot }
end submodule
namespace ring_hom
variables {A B C : Type*} [ring A] [ring B] [ring C]
variables (f : A →+* B) (f_inv : B → A)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `lift_of_right_inverse` -/
def lift_of_right_inverse_aux
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
B →+* C :=
{ to_fun := λ b, g (f_inv b),
map_one' :=
begin
rw [← g.map_one, ← sub_eq_zero, ← g.map_sub, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, f.map_one],
exact hf 1
end,
map_mul' :=
begin
intros x y,
rw [← g.map_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← g.map_sub, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, f.map_mul],
simp only [hf _],
end,
.. add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse f.to_add_monoid_hom f_inv hf ⟨g.to_add_monoid_hom, hg⟩ }
@[simp] lemma lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (a : A) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g hg) (f a) = g a :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply f_inv hf ⟨g.to_add_monoid_hom, hg⟩ a
/-- `lift_of_right_inverse f hf g hg` is the unique ring homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp`),
* where `f : A →+* B` is has a right_inverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : B →+* C` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `ring_hom.eq_lift_of_right_inverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
A .
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
B ----> C
∃!φ
```
-/
def lift_of_right_inverse
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (B →+* C) :=
{ to_fun := λ g, f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g.1 g.2,
inv_fun := λ φ, ⟨φ.comp f, λ x hx, (mem_ker _).mpr $ by simp [(mem_ker _).mp hx]⟩,
left_inv := λ g, by
{ ext,
simp only [comp_apply, lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply, subtype.coe_mk,
subtype.val_eq_coe], },
right_inv := λ φ, by
{ ext b,
simp [lift_of_right_inverse_aux, hf b], } }
/-- A non-computable version of `ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `function.surj_inv`. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable abbreviation lift_of_surjective
(hf : function.surjective f) : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (B →+* C) :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse (function.surj_inv hf) (function.right_inverse_surj_inv hf)
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) (x : A) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g x :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f)
(g : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
ring_hom.ext $ f.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
lemma eq_lift_of_right_inverse (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : B →+* C) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = (f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩) :=
begin
simp_rw ←hh,
exact ((f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm,
end
end ring_hom
namespace double_quot
open ideal
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] (I J : ideal R)
/-- The obvious ring hom `R/I → R/(I ⊔ J)` -/
def quot_left_to_quot_sup : R ⧸ I →+* R ⧸ (I ⊔ J) :=
ideal.quotient.factor I (I ⊔ J) le_sup_left
/-- The kernel of `quot_left_to_quot_sup` -/
lemma ker_quot_left_to_quot_sup :
(quot_left_to_quot_sup I J).ker = J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I) :=
by simp only [mk_ker, sup_idem, sup_comm, quot_left_to_quot_sup, quotient.factor, ker_quotient_lift,
map_eq_iff_sup_ker_eq_of_surjective I^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective, ← sup_assoc]
/-- The ring homomorphism `(R/I)/J' -> R/(I ⊔ J)` induced by `quot_left_to_quot_sup` where `J'`
is the image of `J` in `R/I`-/
def quot_quot_to_quot_sup : (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I) →+* R ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
by exact ideal.quotient.lift (J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I)) (quot_left_to_quot_sup I J)
(ker_quot_left_to_quot_sup I J).symm.le
/-- The composite of the maps `R → (R/I)` and `(R/I) → (R/I)/J'` -/
def quot_quot_mk : R →+* ((R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map I^.quotient.mk) :=
by exact ((J.map I^.quotient.mk)^.quotient.mk).comp I^.quotient.mk
/-- The kernel of `quot_quot_mk` -/
lemma ker_quot_quot_mk : (quot_quot_mk I J).ker = I ⊔ J :=
by rw [ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot, quot_quot_mk, ← comap_comap, ← ring_hom.ker, mk_ker,
comap_map_of_surjective (ideal.quotient.mk I) (quotient.mk_surjective), ← ring_hom.ker, mk_ker,
sup_comm]
/-- The ring homomorphism `R/(I ⊔ J) → (R/I)/J' `induced by `quot_quot_mk` -/
def lift_sup_quot_quot_mk (I J : ideal R) :
R ⧸ (I ⊔ J) →+* (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I) :=
ideal.quotient.lift (I ⊔ J) (quot_quot_mk I J) (ker_quot_quot_mk I J).symm.le
/-- `quot_quot_to_quot_add` and `lift_sup_double_qot_mk` are inverse isomorphisms -/
def quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup : (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I) ≃+* R ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
ring_equiv.of_hom_inv (quot_quot_to_quot_sup I J) (lift_sup_quot_quot_mk I J)
(by { ext z, refl }) (by { ext z, refl })
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup_quot_quot_mk (x : R) :
quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup I J (quot_quot_mk I J x) = ideal.quotient.mk (I ⊔ J) x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup_symm_quot_quot_mk (x : R) :
(quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup I J).symm (ideal.quotient.mk (I ⊔ J) x) = quot_quot_mk I J x :=
rfl
/-- The obvious isomorphism `(R/I)/J' → (R/J)/I' ` -/
def quot_quot_equiv_comm :
(R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map I^.quotient.mk ≃+* (R ⧸ J) ⧸ I.map J^.quotient.mk :=
((quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup I J).trans (quot_equiv_of_eq sup_comm)).trans
(quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup J I).symm
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_comm_quot_quot_mk (x : R) :
quot_quot_equiv_comm I J (quot_quot_mk I J x) = quot_quot_mk J I x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_comm_comp_quot_quot_mk :
ring_hom.comp ↑(quot_quot_equiv_comm I J) (quot_quot_mk I J) = quot_quot_mk J I :=
ring_hom.ext $ quot_quot_equiv_comm_quot_quot_mk I J
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_comm_symm :
(quot_quot_equiv_comm I J).symm = quot_quot_equiv_comm J I :=
rfl
end double_quot
|
c71af327df1c963b7df3cb0f16412a0b498bfa80 | e21db629d2e37a833531fdcb0b37ce4d71825408 | /src/def_lookup.lean | a672400c2e5848bfa1f31f9a575ef8b4440d4567 | [] | no_license | fischerman/GPU-transformation-verifier | 614a28cb4606a05a0eb27e8d4eab999f4f5ea60c | 75a5016f05382738ff93ce5859c4cfa47ccb63c1 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,985,789,300 | 1,579,290,514,000 | 1,579,290,514,000 | 165,031,073 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 102 | lean | import ..alt.def_lookup
import parlang
import mcl
import syncablep
meta def main := def_lookup.main
|
cb86eadda7bfe0951d8414827b3ec62a7c82696b | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/tactic/linarith/parsing.lean | c31cdc3b9fcee330dd77d25d9e169ff29f4a44b3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,534 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import tactic.linarith.datatypes
/-!
# Parsing input expressions into linear form
`linarith` computes the linear form of its input expressions,
assuming (without justification) that the type of these expressions
is a commutative semiring.
It identifies atoms up to ring-equivalence: that is, `(y*3)*x` will be identified `3*(x*y)`,
where the monomial `x*y` is the linear atom.
* Variables are represented by natural numbers.
* Monomials are represented by `monom := rb_map ℕ ℕ`.
The monomial `1` is represented by the empty map.
* Linear combinations of monomials are represented by `sum := rb_map monom ℤ`.
All input expressions are converted to `sum`s, preserving the map from expressions to variables.
We then discard the monomial information, mapping each distinct monomial to a natural number.
The resulting `rb_map ℕ ℤ` represents the ring-normalized linear form of the expression.
This is ultimately converted into a `linexp` in the obvious way.
`linear_forms_and_vars` is the main entry point into this file. Everything else is contained.
-/
open native linarith.ineq tactic
namespace linarith
/-! ### Parsing datatypes -/
/-- Variables (represented by natural numbers) map to their power. -/
@[reducible] meta def monom : Type := rb_map ℕ ℕ
/-- `1` is represented by the empty monomial, the product of no variables. -/
meta def monom.one : monom := rb_map.mk _ _
/-- Compare monomials by first comparing their keys and then their powers. -/
@[reducible] meta def monom.lt : monom → monom → Prop :=
λ a b, (a.keys < b.keys) || ((a.keys = b.keys) && (a.values < b.values))
meta instance : has_lt monom := ⟨monom.lt⟩
/-- Linear combinations of monomials are represented by mapping monomials to coefficients. -/
@[reducible] meta def sum : Type := rb_map monom ℤ
/-- `1` is represented as the singleton sum of the monomial `monom.one` with coefficient 1. -/
meta def sum.one : sum := rb_map.of_list [(monom.one, 1)]
/-- `sum.scale_by_monom s m` multiplies every monomial in `s` by `m`. -/
meta def sum.scale_by_monom (s : sum) (m : monom) : sum :=
s.fold mk_rb_map $ λ m' coeff sm, sm.insert (m.add m') coeff
/-- `sum.mul s1 s2` distributes the multiplication of two sums.` -/
meta def sum.mul (s1 s2 : sum) : sum :=
s1.fold mk_rb_map $ λ mn coeff sm, sm.add $ (s2.scale_by_monom mn).scale coeff
/-- The `n`th power of `s : sum` is the `n`-fold product of `s`, with `s.pow 0 = sum.one`. -/
meta def sum.pow (s : sum) : ℕ → sum
| 0 := sum.one
| (k+1) := s.mul (sum.pow k)
/-- `sum_of_monom m` lifts `m` to a sum with coefficient `1`. -/
meta def sum_of_monom (m : monom) : sum :=
mk_rb_map.insert m 1
/-- The unit monomial `one` is represented by the empty rb map. -/
meta def one : monom := mk_rb_map
/-- A scalar `z` is represented by a `sum` with coefficient `z` and monomial `one` -/
meta def scalar (z : ℤ) : sum :=
mk_rb_map.insert one z
/-- A single variable `n` is represented by a sum with coefficient `1` and monomial `n`. -/
meta def var (n : ℕ) : sum :=
mk_rb_map.insert (mk_rb_map.insert n 1) 1
/-! ### Parsing algorithms -/
local notation `exmap` := list (expr × ℕ)
/--
`linear_form_of_atom red map e` is the atomic case for `linear_form_of_expr`.
If `e` appears with index `k` in `map`, it returns the singleton sum `var k`.
Otherwise it updates `map`, adding `e` with index `n`, and returns the singleton sum `var n`.
-/
meta def linear_form_of_atom (red : transparency) (m : exmap) (e : expr) : tactic (exmap × sum) :=
(do (_, k) ← m.find_defeq red e, return (m, var k)) <|>
(let n := m.length + 1 in return ((e, n)::m, var n))
/--
`linear_form_of_expr red map e` computes the linear form of `e`.
`map` is a lookup map from atomic expressions to variable numbers.
If a new atomic expression is encountered, it is added to the map with a new number.
It matches atomic expressions up to reducibility given by `red`.
Because it matches up to definitional equality, this function must be in the `tactic` monad,
and forces some functions that call it into `tactic` as well.
-/
meta def linear_form_of_expr (red : transparency) : exmap → expr → tactic (exmap × sum)
| m e@`(%%e1 * %%e2) :=
do (m', comp1) ← linear_form_of_expr m e1,
(m', comp2) ← linear_form_of_expr m' e2,
return (m', comp1.mul comp2)
| m `(%%e1 + %%e2) :=
do (m', comp1) ← linear_form_of_expr m e1,
(m', comp2) ← linear_form_of_expr m' e2,
return (m', comp1.add comp2)
| m `(%%e1 - %%e2) :=
do (m', comp1) ← linear_form_of_expr m e1,
(m', comp2) ← linear_form_of_expr m' e2,
return (m', comp1.add (comp2.scale (-1)))
| m `(-%%e) := do (m', comp) ← linear_form_of_expr m e, return (m', comp.scale (-1))
| m p@`(@has_pow.pow _ ℕ _ %%e %%n) :=
match n.to_nat with
| some k :=
do (m', comp) ← linear_form_of_expr m e,
return (m', comp.pow k)
| none := linear_form_of_atom red m p
end
| m e :=
match e.to_int with
| some 0 := return ⟨m, mk_rb_map⟩
| some z := return ⟨m, scalar z⟩
| none := linear_form_of_atom red m e
end
/--
`sum_to_lf s map` eliminates the monomial level of the `sum` `s`.
`map` is a lookup map from monomials to variable numbers.
The output `rb_map ℕ ℤ` has the same structure as `sum`,
but each monomial key is replaced with its index according to `map`.
If any new monomials are encountered, they are assigned variable numbers and `map` is updated.
-/
meta def sum_to_lf (s : sum) (m : rb_map monom ℕ) : rb_map monom ℕ × rb_map ℕ ℤ :=
s.fold (m, mk_rb_map) $ λ mn coeff ⟨map, out⟩,
match map.find mn with
| some n := ⟨map, out.insert n coeff⟩
| none := let n := map.size in ⟨map.insert mn n, out.insert n coeff⟩
end
/--
`to_comp red e e_map monom_map` converts an expression of the form `t < 0`, `t ≤ 0`, or `t = 0`
into a `comp` object.
`e_map` maps atomic expressions to indices; `monom_map` maps monomials to indices.
Both of these are updated during processing and returned.
-/
meta def to_comp (red : transparency) (e : expr) (e_map : exmap) (monom_map : rb_map monom ℕ) :
tactic (comp × exmap × rb_map monom ℕ) :=
do (iq, e) ← parse_into_comp_and_expr e,
(m', comp') ← linear_form_of_expr red e_map e,
let ⟨nm, mm'⟩ := sum_to_lf comp' monom_map,
return ⟨⟨iq, mm'.to_list⟩, m', nm⟩
/--
`to_comp_fold red e_map exprs monom_map` folds `to_comp` over `exprs`,
updating `e_map` and `monom_map` as it goes.
-/
meta def to_comp_fold (red : transparency) : exmap → list expr → rb_map monom ℕ →
tactic (list comp × exmap × rb_map monom ℕ)
| m [] mm := return ([], m, mm)
| m (h::t) mm :=
do (c, m', mm') ← to_comp red h m mm,
(l, mp, mm') ← to_comp_fold m' t mm',
return (c::l, mp, mm')
/--
`linear_forms_and_vars red pfs` is the main interface for computing the linear forms of a list
of expressions. Given a list `pfs` of proofs of comparisons, it produces a list `c` of `comps` of
the same length, such that `c[i]` represents the linear form of the type of `pfs[i]`.
It also returns the largest variable index that appears in comparisons in `c`.
-/
meta def linear_forms_and_max_var (red : transparency) (pfs : list expr) :
tactic (list comp × ℕ) :=
do pftps ← pfs.mmap infer_type,
(l, _, map) ← to_comp_fold red [] pftps mk_rb_map,
return (l, map.size - 1)
end linarith
|
b8ee5ee0752ccc49ee6df6ab8cb293e1479543df | 3fed20a6f59e2663e48ee3bfc33dbc79256b4a50 | /src/sequent.lean | 8a171961bf631498dbd3fffedb64e9bea79476b1 | [] | no_license | arademaker/alc-lean | 575203dae75f466cc686831d8b0d230fc3c00ced | 46d5b582d4272493a26d6d47c0bfa0622c52aae4 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,696,540,378 | 1,618,442,995,000 | 1,618,442,995,000 | 37,130,780 | 4 | 3 | null | 1,618,365,416,000 | 1,433,853,111,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,566 | lean | import alc
import data.multiset
open ALC
open ALC.Concept
-- the labeled concepts
inductive Label : Type
| Forall : Role → Label
| Exists : Role → Label
structure LConcept : Type :=
mk :: (roles : list Label)
(concept : Concept)
open LConcept
open Label
def isAx : Label → Prop
| (Forall _) := true
| (Exists _) := false
def isEx : Label → Prop
| (Forall _) := false
| (Exists _) := true
def every {a : Type} : (a → Prop) → (list a) → Prop
| f [] := true
| f (x::xs) := (f x) ∧ (every f xs)
def negLabel : list Label → list Label
| [] := []
| ((Forall a)::L) := Exists a :: negLabel L
| ((Exists a)::L) := Forall a :: negLabel L
#check (⟨[Forall R#0, Exists R#1], (Concept.Bot)⟩ : LConcept)
open LConcept
open Label
def sigma_aux : list Label -> Concept -> Concept
| [] c := c
| ((Forall r) :: ls) c := Every r (sigma_aux ls c)
| ((Exists r) :: ls) c := Some r (sigma_aux ls c)
def sigma' : LConcept -> Concept
| ⟨ roles , concept ⟩ := sigma_aux roles concept
#reduce sigma' (⟨[Forall R#0, Exists R#1], (Concept.Bot)⟩)
-- sequent calculus for ALC
structure Sequent : Type :=
mk :: (lhs : list LConcept)
(rhs : list LConcept)
local infix ` ⇒ `:51 := Sequent.mk -- \=>
#check [LConcept.mk [Forall R#0] (Concept.Bot)] ⇒ [LConcept.mk [Forall R#0, Exists R#1] (Concept.Bot)]
#check list.map (λ x, LConcept.mk (Forall R#1 :: LConcept.roles x) (x.concept)) [LConcept.mk [Forall R#0] (Concept.Bot)]
inductive proof : list Sequent → Sequent → Type
infix ` ⊢ ` : 25 := proof
| ax : ∀ Ω α, Ω ⊢ [α] ⇒ [α]
| ax_theory : ∀ Ω s, (s ∈ Ω) → Ω ⊢ s -- the only real use of Ω
| ax_falsum : ∀ Ω α, Ω ⊢ [⟨ [], ⊥ ⟩] ⇒ [α]
| weak_l : ∀ Ω Δ Γ δ, Ω ⊢ (Δ ⇒ Γ) → Ω ⊢ (δ::Δ) ⇒ Γ
| weak_r : ∀ Ω Δ Γ γ, Ω ⊢ (Δ ⇒ Γ) → Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ (γ::Γ)
| contraction_l : ∀ Ω Δ Γ δ, Ω ⊢ (δ::δ::Δ) ⇒ Γ → Ω ⊢ (δ::Δ) ⇒ Γ
| contraction_r : ∀ Ω Δ Γ γ, Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ (γ::γ::Γ) → Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ (γ::Γ)
| perm_l : ∀ Ω Δ₁ Δ₂ Γ δ₁ δ₂, Ω ⊢ Δ₁ ++ (δ₁ :: δ₂ :: Δ₂) ⇒ Γ → Ω ⊢ Δ₁ ++ (δ₂::δ₁::Δ₂) ⇒ Γ
| perm_r : ∀ Ω Δ Γ₁ Γ₂ γ₁ γ₂, Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ Γ₁ ++ (γ₁::γ₂::Γ₂) → Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ Γ₁ ++ (γ₂::γ₁::Γ₂)
| cut : ∀ Ω Δ₁ Δ₂ Γ₁ Γ₂ α, Ω ⊢ Δ₁ ⇒ α :: Γ₁ → Ω ⊢ α :: Δ₂ ⇒ Γ₂ → Ω ⊢ Δ₁ ++ Δ₂ ⇒ Γ₁ ++ Γ₂
| and_l : ∀ Ω Δ Γ α β L, (every isAx L) →
Ω ⊢ (⟨L, α⟩ :: ⟨L,β⟩ :: Δ) ⇒ Γ →
Ω ⊢ (⟨ L, α ⊓ β⟩ :: Δ) ⇒ Γ
| and_r : ∀ Ω₁ Ω₂ Δ Γ α β L, (every isAx L) →
Ω₁ ⊢ Δ ⇒ (⟨L, α⟩ :: Γ) →
Ω₂ ⊢ Δ ⇒ (⟨L, β⟩ :: Γ) →
Ω₁ ++ Ω₂ ⊢ Δ ⇒ (⟨L, α ⊓ β⟩ :: Γ)
| all_r : ∀ Ω Δ Γ L α R, Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨ L ++ [Forall R], α⟩ :: Γ →
Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨ L, Ax R : α⟩ :: Γ
| all_l : ∀ Ω Δ Γ L α R, Ω ⊢ ⟨ L ++ [Forall R], α⟩ :: Δ ⇒ Γ →
Ω ⊢ ⟨ L, Ax R : α ⟩ :: Δ ⇒ Γ
| exists_r : ∀ Ω Δ Γ L α R, Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨ (Exists R) :: L, α⟩ :: Γ →
Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨ L, Ex R : α⟩ :: Γ
| or_l : ∀ Ω Δ Γ α β L, (every isEx L) →
Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ (⟨L, α⟩ :: Γ) →
Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ (⟨L, β⟩ :: Γ) →
Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ (⟨L, α ⊔ β⟩ :: Γ)
| or_r : ∀ Ω Δ Γ α β L, (every isEx L) →
Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨L, α⟩ :: ⟨L,β⟩ :: Γ →
Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨L, α ⊓ β⟩ :: Γ
| neg_l : ∀ Ω Δ Γ α L L1, L1 = negLabel L → Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨L,α⟩ :: Γ → Ω ⊢ ⟨L1, ¬ₐα⟩ :: Δ ⇒ Γ
| neg_r : ∀ Ω Δ Γ α L L1, L1 = negLabel L → Ω ⊢ Δ ++ [⟨L,α⟩] ⇒ Γ → Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ ⟨L1, ¬ₐα⟩ :: Γ
| prom_ex : ∀ Ω δ Γ R, Ω ⊢ [δ] ⇒ Γ →
Ω ⊢ [⟨ Exists R :: LConcept.roles δ, LConcept.concept δ⟩] ⇒
(list.map (λ x, ⟨ (Exists R) :: LConcept.roles x, LConcept.concept x⟩) Γ)
| prom_ax : ∀ Ω γ Δ R, Ω ⊢ Δ ⇒ [γ] →
Ω ⊢ (list.map (λ x, ⟨ Forall R :: LConcept.roles x, LConcept.concept x ⟩) Δ) ⇒
[⟨ Forall R :: LConcept.roles γ, LConcept.concept γ⟩]
infix ` ⊢ ` := proof -- \vdash
def doctor := C#1
def child := R#1
lemma l1 : proof [] ([LConcept.mk [Forall child] doctor] ⇒ [LConcept.mk [Forall child] doctor]) :=
begin
have S := proof.ax [] ⟨[] , doctor⟩,
exact proof.prom_ax [] _ _ child S,
end
lemma l2 : proof [] ([⟨[], ⊤⟩, LConcept.mk [Forall child] doctor] ⇒ [LConcept.mk [Forall child] doctor]) :=
begin
apply proof.weak_l,
exact l1,
end
example : proof [] ([⟨[], ⊤⟩] ⇒
[LConcept.mk [] (Concept.Some R#1 (Concept.Negation C#1)), LConcept.mk [Forall R#1] C#1]) :=
begin
have S₁ := proof.ax [] ⟨ [] , C#1 ⟩,
have S₂ := proof.prom_ax _ _ _ R#1 S₁, simp at S₂,
have J₁ := proof.weak_l [] [{roles := [Forall R#1], concept := C#1}] [{roles := [Forall R#1], concept := C#1}] ⟨[],⊤⟩ S₂,
have J₂ := proof.neg_r [] [{roles := ([] : list Label), concept := ⊤}] [{roles := [Forall R#1], concept := C#1}] C#1 [Forall R#1] [Exists R#1] _ J₁,
clear S₁ S₂ J₁,
exact proof.exists_r [] [⟨[], ⊤⟩] [{roles := [Forall R#1], concept := C#1}] [] (¬ₐ C#1) R#1 J₂,
tauto,
end
example : proof []
([LConcept.mk ([] : list Label) (Ex R#1 : ⊤)] ⇒
[(LConcept.mk [Exists R#1] ¬ₐ C#1), (LConcept.mk [Exists R#1,Forall R#1] C#1)]) :=
begin
apply proof.neg_r []
[{roles := ([] : list Label), concept := Ex R#1:⊤}]
[{roles := [Exists R#1, Forall R#1], concept := C#1}] C#1 [Forall R#1] [Exists R#1],
rw [negLabel, negLabel],
sorry
end
lemma in_map {α β} {x : α} {A : list α} (x ∈ A) (f : α → β) : (f x) ∈ (list.map f A) :=
begin
finish,
end
lemma head_out_map {α β} {a : α } {A : list α} {f : α → β} : list.map f (a::A) = (f a) :: list.map f A :=
begin
finish,
end
def subseteq_imp_inter_subseteq {α} {A C : set α} {B : set α} : A ⊆ C → (A ∩ B) ⊆ C :=
begin
intro h, have h1 : A ∩ B ⊆ A, exact set.inter_subset_left A B, exact set.subset.trans h1 h,
end
def subseteq_imp_union_subseteq {α} {A C : set α} {B : set α} : A ⊆ C → A ⊆ B ∪ C :=
begin
intro h, have h1 : C ⊆ B ∪ C, exact set.subset_union_right B C, exact set.subset.trans h h1,
end
def foldl_inter : list LConcept → Concept
| [] := ⊤
| [a] := sigma' a
| (a::ls) := sigma' a ⊓ (foldl_inter ls)
def foldl_union : list LConcept → Concept
| [] := ⊥
| [a] := sigma' a
| (a::ls) := sigma' a ⊔ (foldl_union ls)
def seq_to_stmt : Sequent → Statement
| (Δ ⇒ Γ) := Statement.Subsumption (foldl_inter Δ) (foldl_union Γ)
lemma interp_foldl_inter_append {xs a I}: interp I (foldl_inter (xs ++ [a])) = interp I (foldl_inter (a::xs)) :=
begin
sorry,
end
lemma interp_foldl_union_reverse {xs I} : interp I (foldl_inter xs) = interp I (foldl_inter (list.reverse xs)) :=
begin
sorry,
end
lemma interp_stmt_weak_l {Δ Γ I} ( δ : LConcept) : (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ ⇒ Γ))) → (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(δ::Δ ⇒ Γ))) :=
begin
intro a,
induction Δ with δ₁ Δ₂ Δh,
induction Γ with γ₁ Γ₂ Γh,
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt foldl_union interp at *,
rw ← set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty a, exact set.subset_univ (interp I (foldl_inter [δ])),
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt interp at *,
rw (set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset a), exact (interp I (foldl_inter [δ])).subset_univ,
induction Γ with γ₁ Γ₂ Γh,
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt interp foldl_inter at *, rw set.inter_comm, exact subseteq_imp_inter_subseteq a,
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt foldl_union foldl_inter at *,
unfold1 interp, rw set.inter_comm, exact subseteq_imp_inter_subseteq a,
end
lemma gen_interp_stmt_weak_l {Δ₁ Δ₂ Γ I} : (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ₂ ⇒ Γ))) → (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ₁++Δ₂ ⇒ Γ))) :=
begin
intro h,
induction Δ₁ with Δ₁0 Δ₁1 Δ₁h, simp, exact h, exact interp_stmt_weak_l Δ₁0 Δ₁h,
end
lemma interp_stmt_weak_r {Δ Γ I} ( γ : LConcept) : (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ ⇒ Γ))) → (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ ⇒ γ::Γ))) :=
begin
intro a,
induction Δ with δ₁ Δ₂ Δh,
induction Γ with γ₁ Γ₂ Γh,
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt foldl_union interp at *,
rw set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty a, exact (interp I (sigma' γ)).empty_subset,
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt interp foldl_union at *, exact subseteq_imp_union_subseteq a,
induction Γ with γ₁ Γ₂ Γh,
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt interp foldl_union at *, rw set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty a,
exact set.empty_subset (interp I (sigma' γ)),
unfold seq_to_stmt interp_stmt foldl_union foldl_inter at *, unfold interp, exact subseteq_imp_union_subseteq a,
end
lemma gen_interp_stmt_weak_r {Δ Γ₁ Γ₂ I} : (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ ⇒ Γ₂))) → (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ ⇒ Γ₁++Γ₂))) :=
begin
intro h,
induction Γ₁ with Γ₁0 Γ₁1 Γ₁h, simp, exact h, exact interp_stmt_weak_r Γ₁0 Γ₁h,
end
#check is_commutative
lemma interp_stmt_contract_l {Δ Γ I} {δ : LConcept} : (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(δ::δ::Δ ⇒ Γ))) → (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(δ::Δ ⇒ Γ))) :=
begin
intro h,
unfold seq_to_stmt foldl_inter interp at *,
induction Δ with Δ0 Δ1,
unfold foldl_inter interp_stmt interp at *, rw set.inter_self at h, exact h,
unfold foldl_inter interp_stmt interp at *, rw ← set.inter_assoc at h , rw set.inter_self at h, exact h,
end
lemma interp_stmt_contract_r {Δ Γ I} {γ : LConcept} : (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ ⇒ γ::γ::Γ))) → (interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt(Δ ⇒ γ::Γ))) :=
begin
intro h,
unfold seq_to_stmt foldl_inter interp at *,
induction Γ with Γ0 Γ1,
unfold foldl_union interp_stmt interp at *, rw set.union_self at h, exact h,
unfold foldl_union interp_stmt interp at *, rw ← set.union_assoc at h , rw set.union_self at h, exact h,
end
lemma interp_stmt_perm_l {Δ₁ Δ₂ Γ I δ₁ δ₂} : interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt (Δ₁ ++ δ₁ :: δ₂ :: Δ₂ ⇒ Γ)) → interp_stmt I (seq_to_stmt (Δ₁ ++ δ₂ :: δ₁ :: Δ₂ ⇒ Γ)) :=
begin
intro h,
unfold seq_to_stmt at *,
induction Δ₁ with Δ₁0 Δ₁1,
simp at *, unfold foldl_inter interp_stmt interp at *,
induction Δ₂ with Δ₂0 Δ₂1,
unfold foldl_inter at *, rw set.inter_comm at h, exact h,
unfold foldl_inter interp at *, rw ← set.inter_assoc at h, nth_rewrite 1 set.inter_comm at h, rw set.inter_assoc at h, exact h,
sorry
end
theorem soundness {Ω : list Sequent} : ∀ {Δ Γ}, (proof Ω (Δ ⇒ Γ)) → models (list.map seq_to_stmt Ω) (seq_to_stmt (Δ ⇒ Γ))
| _ _ (proof.ax Ω₁ α₁) :=
by {unfold models, intros h1 h2,
unfold seq_to_stmt foldl_inter foldl_union interp_stmt,
}
| _ _ (proof.ax_theory Ω₁ (lhs ⇒ rhs) S) :=
by {unfold models, intros h1 h2, unfold satisfies at h2,
have h3 := h2 (seq_to_stmt(lhs ⇒ rhs )),
have h4 := in_map (lhs ⇒ rhs) S seq_to_stmt,
exact h2 (seq_to_stmt(lhs ⇒ rhs )) h4, exact (lhs ⇒ rhs),
}
| _ _ (proof.ax_falsum Ω₁ α₁) :=
by {unfold models, intros h1 h2,
unfold seq_to_stmt foldl_inter foldl_union interp_stmt sigma' sigma_aux interp at *, exact set.empty_subset (interp h1 (sigma' α₁)),
}
| _ _ (proof.weak_l Ω₁ Δ Γ δ h) :=
by { unfold models, intros I h2, unfold satisfies at h2,
have h4 := soundness h, unfold models at h4, have h5 := h4 I, unfold satisfies at h5, have h6 := h5 h2,
exact interp_stmt_weak_l δ h6,
}
| _ _ (proof.weak_r Ω₁ Δ Γ γ h) :=
by { unfold models, intros I h2, unfold satisfies at h2,
have h4 := soundness h, unfold models at h4, have h5 := h4 I, unfold satisfies at h5, have h6 := h5 h2,
exact interp_stmt_weak_r γ h6,
}
| _ _ (proof.contraction_l Ω₁ Δ Γ δ h) :=
by { unfold models, intros I h1, unfold satisfies at h1,
have h2 := soundness h, unfold models at h2, have h3 := h2 I, unfold satisfies at h3, have h4:= h3 h1,
exact interp_stmt_contract_l h4,
}
| _ _ (proof.contraction_r Ω₁ Δ Γ δ h) :=
by { unfold models, intros I h1, unfold satisfies at h1,
have h2 := soundness h, unfold models at h2, have h3 := h2 I, unfold satisfies at h3, have h4:= h3 h1,
exact interp_stmt_contract_r h4,
}
| _ _ (proof.perm_l Ω Δ₁ Δ₂ Γ δ₁ δ₂ h) :=
by { unfold models, intros I h1, unfold satisfies at h1,
have h2 := soundness h, unfold models at h2, have h3 := h2 I, unfold satisfies at h3, have h4:= h3 h1,
sorry,
}
/-
reserve infix ` ⊢ `:26
inductive Sequent : list LConcept → list LConcept → Type
infix ⊢ := Sequent
| One : ∀ L, L ⊢ L
| Neg : ∀ L, [LConcept.mk [] Concept.Bot] ⊢ L
| Ins : ∀ L₁ A, A ∈ L₁ → L₁ ⊢ [A]
| WeL : ∀ L₁ L₂ A, A ∈ L₁ → L₁ ⊢ L₂ → A::L₁ ⊢ L₂
| WeR : ∀ L₁ L₂ B, B ∈ L₂ → L₁ ⊢ L₂ → L₁ ⊢ B::L₂
| CoL : ∀ L₁ L₂ A, A::A::L₁ ⊢ L₂ → (A::L₁) ⊢ L₂
| CoR : ∀ L₁ L₂ B, L₁ ⊢ (B::L₂) → L₁ ⊢ (B::L₂)
| PeL : ∀ AL₁ A₁ B₁ BL₁ L₂, AL₁ ++ [A₁,B₁] ++ BL₁ ⊢ L₂ → AL₁ ++ [B₁,A₁] ++ BL₁ ⊢ L₂
| PeR : ∀ AL₂ A₂ B₂ BL₂ L₁, L₁ ⊢ AL₂ ++ [A₂,B₂] ++ BL₂ → L₁ ⊢ AL₂ ++ [B₂,A₂] ++ BL₂
| CuT : ∀ AL₁ BL₁ B AL₂ CL₂, AL₁ ⊢ BL₁ ++ [B] → B::AL₂ ⊢ CL₂ → AL₁ ++ AL₂ ⊢ BL₁ ++ CL₂
#check Sequent
instance Concept_Intersection_is_commutative {AC AR : Type}:
@is_commutative (Concept AC AR) Concept.Intersection := ⟨λ a b, by⟩
this is the idea for the implementation, we can use folds in multiset, but I still have to prove commutative to
use it, but I am having trouble as it is...
def inter_LConcepts {AC AR : Type} (as : list (qLConcept AC AR)) :=
list.foldl (Concept.Intersection) (sigma_exhaust (list.head as)) (list.map sigma_exhaust (list.tail as))
def union_LConcepts {AC AR : Type} (as : list (LConcept AC AR)) :=
list.foldl (Concept.Union) (sigma_exhaust (list.head as)) (list.map sigma_exhaust (list.tail as))
def sequent {AC AR : Type} (as : list (LConcept AC AR)) (bs : list (LConcept AC AR)) :=
subsumption (inter_LConcepts as) (union_LConcepts bs)
#reduce list.foldl (λ x y, Concept.Intersection x y) (Concept.Top) [Concept.Bot]
lemma weak_l_srule {AC AR : Type} {as bs : list (LConcept AC AR)}
(a : LConcept AC AR) (h1 : list.mem a as) (h : subsequent as bs) : subsequent (a::as) bs :=
begin
unfold subsequent at *,
unfold subsumption at *,
intro I,
have hn : interp I (inter_LConcepts as) ⊆ interp I (union_LConcepts bs), from h I,
end
pure logic! Sequent Calculus:
Man |- Person Person |- Casado
---------------------------------- cut
Man |- Casado
dependent types:
h1 : Man |- Person
h2 : Person |- Casado
cut h1 h2 : Man |- Casado
-/
|
b0600877c7dedeb5405849e7a938be0a197f5415 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/category_theory/preadditive/single_obj.lean | 00e2af87425d6c0cf2016a1c2714e0ce6febb495 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 721 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.preadditive.default
import category_theory.single_obj
/-!
# `single_obj α` is preadditive when `α` is a ring.
-/
namespace category_theory
variables {α : Type*} [ring α]
instance (X Y : single_obj α) : add_comm_group (X ⟶ Y) :=
by { change add_comm_group α, apply_instance, }
instance : preadditive (single_obj α) :=
{ add_comp' := λ _ _ _ f f' g, mul_add g f f',
comp_add' := λ _ _ _ f g g', add_mul g g' f, }
-- TODO define `PreAddCat` (with additive functors as morphisms), and `Ring ⥤ PreAddCat`.
end category_theory
|
74c21c147277cb8b9649cb0f24615a63103be9cd | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/types/pi.hlean | 28dfa92c9896b587af3cfce494896598a54d6905 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,058 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014-15 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Partially ported from Coq HoTT
Theorems about pi-types (dependent function spaces)
-/
import types.sigma arity
open eq equiv is_equiv funext sigma unit bool is_trunc prod
namespace pi
variables {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type} {B' : A' → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type}
{D : Πa b, C a b → Type}
{a a' a'' : A} {b b₁ b₂ : B a} {b' : B a'} {b'' : B a''} {f g : Πa, B a}
/- Paths -/
/-
Paths [p : f ≈ g] in a function type [Πx:X, P x] are equivalent to functions taking values
in path types, [H : Πx:X, f x ≈ g x], or concisely, [H : f ~ g].
This equivalence, however, is just the combination of [apd10] and function extensionality
[funext], and as such, [eq_of_homotopy]
Now we show how these things compute.
-/
definition apd10_eq_of_homotopy (h : f ~ g) : apd10 (eq_of_homotopy h) ~ h :=
apd10 (right_inv apd10 h)
definition eq_of_homotopy_eta (p : f = g) : eq_of_homotopy (apd10 p) = p :=
left_inv apd10 p
definition eq_of_homotopy_idp (f : Πa, B a) : eq_of_homotopy (λx : A, refl (f x)) = refl f :=
!eq_of_homotopy_eta
/-
The identification of the path space of a dependent function space,
up to equivalence, is of course just funext.
-/
definition eq_equiv_homotopy (f g : Πx, B x) : (f = g) ≃ (f ~ g) :=
equiv.mk apd10 _
definition pi_eq_equiv (f g : Πx, B x) : (f = g) ≃ (f ~ g) := !eq_equiv_homotopy
definition is_equiv_eq_of_homotopy (f g : Πx, B x)
: is_equiv (eq_of_homotopy : f ~ g → f = g) :=
_
definition homotopy_equiv_eq (f g : Πx, B x) : (f ~ g) ≃ (f = g) :=
equiv.mk eq_of_homotopy _
/- Transport -/
definition pi_transport (p : a = a') (f : Π(b : B a), C a b)
: (transport (λa, Π(b : B a), C a b) p f) ~ (λb, !tr_inv_tr ▸ (p ▸D (f (p⁻¹ ▸ b)))) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- A special case of [transport_pi] where the type [B] does not depend on [A],
and so it is just a fixed type [B]. -/
definition pi_transport_constant {C : A → A' → Type} (p : a = a') (f : Π(b : A'), C a b) (b : A')
: (transport _ p f) b = p ▸ (f b) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- Pathovers -/
definition pi_pathover {f : Πb, C a b} {g : Πb', C a' b'} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π(b : B a) (b' : B a') (q : b =[p] b'), f b =[apo011 C p q] g b') : f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
apply eq_of_pathover_idp, apply r
end
definition pi_pathover_left {f : Πb, C a b} {g : Πb', C a' b'} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π(b : B a), f b =[apo011 C p !pathover_tr] g (p ▸ b)) : f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
apply eq_of_pathover_idp, apply r
end
definition pi_pathover_right {f : Πb, C a b} {g : Πb', C a' b'} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π(b' : B a'), f (p⁻¹ ▸ b') =[apo011 C p !tr_pathover] g b') : f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
apply eq_of_pathover_idp, apply r
end
definition pi_pathover_constant {C : A → A' → Type} {f : Π(b : A'), C a b}
{g : Π(b : A'), C a' b} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π(b : A'), f b =[p] g b) : f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
exact eq_of_pathover_idp (r b),
end
-- a version where C is uncurried, but where the conclusion of r is still a proper pathover
-- instead of a heterogenous equality
definition pi_pathover' {C : (Σa, B a) → Type} {f : Πb, C ⟨a, b⟩} {g : Πb', C ⟨a', b'⟩}
{p : a = a'} (r : Π(b : B a) (b' : B a') (q : b =[p] b'), f b =[dpair_eq_dpair p q] g b')
: f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
apply (@eq_of_pathover_idp _ C), exact (r b b (pathover.idpatho b)),
end
definition pi_pathover_left' {C : (Σa, B a) → Type} {f : Πb, C ⟨a, b⟩} {g : Πb', C ⟨a', b'⟩}
{p : a = a'} (r : Π(b : B a), f b =[dpair_eq_dpair p !pathover_tr] g (p ▸ b))
: f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
apply eq_of_pathover_idp, esimp at r, exact !pathover_ap (r b)
end
definition pi_pathover_right' {C : (Σa, B a) → Type} {f : Πb, C ⟨a, b⟩} {g : Πb', C ⟨a', b'⟩}
{p : a = a'} (r : Π(b' : B a'), f (p⁻¹ ▸ b') =[dpair_eq_dpair p !tr_pathover] g b')
: f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
apply eq_of_pathover_idp, esimp at r, exact !pathover_ap (r b)
end
/- Maps on paths -/
/- The action of maps given by lambda. -/
definition ap_lambdaD {C : A' → Type} (p : a = a') (f : Πa b, C b) :
ap (λa b, f a b) p = eq_of_homotopy (λb, ap (λa, f a b) p) :=
begin
apply (eq.rec_on p),
apply inverse,
apply eq_of_homotopy_idp
end
/- Dependent paths -/
/- with more implicit arguments the conclusion of the following theorem is
(Π(b : B a), transportD B C p b (f b) = g (transport B p b)) ≃
(transport (λa, Π(b : B a), C a b) p f = g) -/
definition heq_piD (p : a = a') (f : Π(b : B a), C a b)
(g : Π(b' : B a'), C a' b') : (Π(b : B a), p ▸D (f b) = g (p ▸ b)) ≃ (p ▸ f = g) :=
eq.rec_on p (λg, !homotopy_equiv_eq) g
definition heq_pi {C : A → Type} (p : a = a') (f : Π(b : B a), C a)
(g : Π(b' : B a'), C a') : (Π(b : B a), p ▸ (f b) = g (p ▸ b)) ≃ (p ▸ f = g) :=
eq.rec_on p (λg, !homotopy_equiv_eq) g
section
open sigma sigma.ops
/- more implicit arguments:
(Π(b : B a), transport C (sigma_eq p idp) (f b) = g (p ▸ b)) ≃
(Π(b : B a), transportD B (λ(a : A) (b : B a), C ⟨a, b⟩) p b (f b) = g (transport B p b)) -/
definition heq_pi_sigma {C : (Σa, B a) → Type} (p : a = a')
(f : Π(b : B a), C ⟨a, b⟩) (g : Π(b' : B a'), C ⟨a', b'⟩) :
(Π(b : B a), (sigma_eq p !pathover_tr) ▸ (f b) = g (p ▸ b)) ≃
(Π(b : B a), p ▸D (f b) = g (p ▸ b)) :=
eq.rec_on p (λg, !equiv.refl) g
end
/- Functorial action -/
variables (f0 : A' → A) (f1 : Π(a':A'), B (f0 a') → B' a')
/- The functoriality of [forall] is slightly subtle: it is contravariant in the domain type and covariant in the codomain, but the codomain is dependent on the domain. -/
definition pi_functor [unfold_full] : (Π(a:A), B a) → (Π(a':A'), B' a') :=
λg a', f1 a' (g (f0 a'))
definition pi_functor_left [unfold_full] (B : A → Type) : (Π(a:A), B a) → (Π(a':A'), B (f0 a')) :=
pi_functor f0 (λa, id)
definition pi_functor_right [unfold_full] {B' : A → Type} (f1 : Π(a:A), B a → B' a)
: (Π(a:A), B a) → (Π(a:A), B' a) :=
pi_functor id f1
definition ap_pi_functor {g g' : Π(a:A), B a} (h : g ~ g')
: ap (pi_functor f0 f1) (eq_of_homotopy h)
= eq_of_homotopy (λa':A', (ap (f1 a') (h (f0 a')))) :=
begin
apply (is_equiv_rect (@apd10 A B g g')), intro p, clear h,
cases p,
apply concat,
exact (ap (ap (pi_functor f0 f1)) (eq_of_homotopy_idp g)),
apply symm, apply eq_of_homotopy_idp
end
/- Equivalences -/
definition is_equiv_pi_functor [instance] [constructor] [H0 : is_equiv f0]
[H1 : Πa', is_equiv (f1 a')] : is_equiv (pi_functor f0 f1) :=
begin
apply (adjointify (pi_functor f0 f1) (pi_functor f0⁻¹
(λ(a : A) (b' : B' (f0⁻¹ a)), transport B (right_inv f0 a) ((f1 (f0⁻¹ a))⁻¹ b')))),
begin
intro h, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a', esimp,
rewrite [adj f0 a',-tr_compose,fn_tr_eq_tr_fn _ f1,right_inv (f1 _)],
apply apd
end,
begin
intro h, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, esimp,
rewrite [left_inv (f1 _)],
apply apd
end
end
definition pi_equiv_pi_of_is_equiv [constructor] [H : is_equiv f0]
[H1 : Πa', is_equiv (f1 a')] : (Πa, B a) ≃ (Πa', B' a') :=
equiv.mk (pi_functor f0 f1) _
definition pi_equiv_pi [constructor] (f0 : A' ≃ A) (f1 : Πa', (B (to_fun f0 a') ≃ B' a'))
: (Πa, B a) ≃ (Πa', B' a') :=
pi_equiv_pi_of_is_equiv (to_fun f0) (λa', to_fun (f1 a'))
definition pi_equiv_pi_right [constructor] {P Q : A → Type} (g : Πa, P a ≃ Q a)
: (Πa, P a) ≃ (Πa, Q a) :=
pi_equiv_pi equiv.refl g
/- Equivalence if one of the types is contractible -/
definition pi_equiv_of_is_contr_left [constructor] (B : A → Type) [H : is_contr A]
: (Πa, B a) ≃ B (center A) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro f, exact f (center A)},
{ intro b a, exact (center_eq a) ▸ b},
{ intro b, rewrite [prop_eq_of_is_contr (center_eq (center A)) idp]},
{ intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, induction (center_eq a),
rewrite [prop_eq_of_is_contr (center_eq (center A)) idp]}
end
definition pi_equiv_of_is_contr_right [constructor] [H : Πa, is_contr (B a)]
: (Πa, B a) ≃ unit :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro f, exact star},
{ intro u a, exact !center},
{ intro u, induction u, reflexivity},
{ intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, apply is_prop.elim}
end
/- Interaction with other type constructors -/
-- most of these are in the file of the other type constructor
definition pi_empty_left [constructor] (B : empty → Type) : (Πx, B x) ≃ unit :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro f, exact star},
{ intro x y, contradiction},
{ intro x, induction x, reflexivity},
{ intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro y, contradiction},
end
definition pi_unit_left [constructor] (B : unit → Type) : (Πx, B x) ≃ B star :=
!pi_equiv_of_is_contr_left
definition pi_bool_left [constructor] (B : bool → Type) : (Πx, B x) ≃ B ff × B tt :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro f, exact (f ff, f tt)},
{ intro x b, induction x, induction b: assumption},
{ intro x, induction x, reflexivity},
{ intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b, induction b: reflexivity},
end
/- Truncatedness: any dependent product of n-types is an n-type -/
theorem is_trunc_pi (B : A → Type) (n : trunc_index)
[H : ∀a, is_trunc n (B a)] : is_trunc n (Πa, B a) :=
begin
revert B H,
eapply (trunc_index.rec_on n),
{intro B H,
fapply is_contr.mk,
intro a, apply center,
intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy,
intro x, apply (center_eq (f x))},
{intro n IH B H,
fapply is_trunc_succ_intro, intro f g,
fapply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
apply equiv.symm, apply eq_equiv_homotopy,
apply IH,
intro a,
show is_trunc n (f a = g a), from
is_trunc_eq n (f a) (g a)}
end
local attribute is_trunc_pi [instance]
theorem is_trunc_pi_eq [instance] [priority 500] (n : trunc_index) (f g : Πa, B a)
[H : ∀a, is_trunc n (f a = g a)] : is_trunc n (f = g) :=
begin
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev,
apply eq_equiv_homotopy
end
theorem is_trunc_not [instance] (n : trunc_index) (A : Type) : is_trunc (n.+1) ¬A :=
by unfold not;exact _
theorem is_prop_pi_eq [instance] [priority 490] (a : A) : is_prop (Π(a' : A), a = a') :=
is_prop_of_imp_is_contr
( assume (f : Πa', a = a'),
have is_contr A, from is_contr.mk a f,
by exact _) /- force type clas resolution -/
theorem is_prop_neg (A : Type) : is_prop (¬A) := _
local attribute ne [reducible]
theorem is_prop_ne [instance] {A : Type} (a b : A) : is_prop (a ≠ b) := _
/- Symmetry of Π -/
definition is_equiv_flip [instance] {P : A → A' → Type}
: is_equiv (@function.flip A A' P) :=
begin
fapply is_equiv.mk,
exact (@function.flip _ _ (function.flip P)),
repeat (intro f; apply idp)
end
definition pi_comm_equiv {P : A → A' → Type} : (Πa b, P a b) ≃ (Πb a, P a b) :=
equiv.mk (@function.flip _ _ P) _
end pi
attribute pi.is_trunc_pi [instance] [priority 1520]
|
0783893cddf9eff3f69f0a43ba62ed01cc4a11ac | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/analysis/asymptotics/specific_asymptotics.lean | eb6b3c4b0aa279cab8f59f4e83ad7ac957192125 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,631 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import analysis.normed_space.ordered
import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics
/-!
# A collection of specific asymptotic results
This file contains specific lemmas about asymptotics which don't have their place in the general
theory developped in `analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics`.
-/
open filter asymptotics
open_locale topological_space
section linear_ordered_field
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [linear_ordered_field 𝕜]
lemma pow_div_pow_eventually_eq_at_top {p q : ℕ} :
(λ x : 𝕜, x^p / x^q) =ᶠ[at_top] (λ x, x^((p : ℤ) -q)) :=
begin
apply ((eventually_gt_at_top (0 : 𝕜)).mono (λ x hx, _)),
simp [fpow_sub hx.ne'],
end
lemma pow_div_pow_eventually_eq_at_bot {p q : ℕ} :
(λ x : 𝕜, x^p / x^q) =ᶠ[at_bot] (λ x, x^((p : ℤ) -q)) :=
begin
apply ((eventually_lt_at_bot (0 : 𝕜)).mono (λ x hx, _)),
simp [fpow_sub hx.ne'.symm],
end
lemma tendsto_fpow_at_top_at_top {n : ℤ}
(hn : 0 < n) : tendsto (λ x : 𝕜, x^n) at_top at_top :=
begin
lift n to ℕ using hn.le,
exact tendsto_pow_at_top (nat.succ_le_iff.mpr $int.coe_nat_pos.mp hn)
end
lemma tendsto_pow_div_pow_at_top_at_top {p q : ℕ}
(hpq : q < p) : tendsto (λ x : 𝕜, x^p / x^q) at_top at_top :=
begin
rw tendsto_congr' pow_div_pow_eventually_eq_at_top,
apply tendsto_fpow_at_top_at_top,
linarith
end
lemma tendsto_pow_div_pow_at_top_zero [topological_space 𝕜] [order_topology 𝕜] {p q : ℕ}
(hpq : p < q) : tendsto (λ x : 𝕜, x^p / x^q) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rw tendsto_congr' pow_div_pow_eventually_eq_at_top,
apply tendsto_fpow_at_top_zero,
linarith
end
end linear_ordered_field
section normed_linear_ordered_field
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_linear_ordered_field 𝕜]
lemma asymptotics.is_o_pow_pow_at_top_of_lt
[order_topology 𝕜] {p q : ℕ} (hpq : p < q) :
is_o (λ x : 𝕜, x^p) (λ x, x^q) at_top :=
begin
refine (is_o_iff_tendsto' _).mpr (tendsto_pow_div_pow_at_top_zero hpq),
exact (eventually_gt_at_top 0).mono (λ x hx hxq, (pow_ne_zero q hx.ne' hxq).elim),
end
lemma asymptotics.is_O.trans_tendsto_norm_at_top {α : Type*} {u v : α → 𝕜} {l : filter α}
(huv : is_O u v l) (hu : tendsto (λ x, ∥u x∥) l at_top) : tendsto (λ x, ∥v x∥) l at_top :=
begin
rcases huv.exists_pos with ⟨c, hc, hcuv⟩,
rw is_O_with at hcuv,
convert tendsto.at_top_div_const hc (tendsto_at_top_mono' l hcuv hu),
ext x,
rw mul_div_cancel_left _ hc.ne.symm,
end
end normed_linear_ordered_field
|
2b7f3e4ca2100f797e81dd361dc6085b9ab84e90 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /stage0/src/Lean/Server/Watchdog.lean | 2402ede8ecb4d3d6c22266aa6e93a376129830e1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,001 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Marc Huisinga. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Marc Huisinga, Wojciech Nawrocki
-/
import Init.System.IO
import Init.Data.ByteArray
import Std.Data.RBMap
import Lean.Elab.Import
import Lean.Data.Lsp
import Lean.Server.FileSource
import Lean.Server.Utils
/-!
For general server architecture, see `README.md`. This module implements the watchdog process.
## Watchdog state
Most LSP clients only send us file diffs, so to facilitate sending entire file contents to freshly restarted
workers, the watchdog needs to maintain the current state of each file. It can also use this state to detect changes
to the header and thus restart the corresponding worker, freeing its imports.
TODO(WN):
We may eventually want to keep track of approximately (since this isn't knowable exactly) where in the file a worker
crashed. Then on restart, we tell said worker to only parse up to that point and query the user about how to proceed
(continue OR allow the user to fix the bug and then continue OR ..). Without this, if the crash is deterministic,
users may be confused about why the server seemingly stopped working for a single file.
## Watchdog <-> worker communication
The watchdog process and its file worker processes communicate via LSP. If the necessity arises,
we might add non-standard commands similarly based on JSON-RPC. Most requests and notifications
are forwarded to the corresponding file worker process, with the exception of these notifications:
- textDocument/didOpen: Launch the file worker, create the associated watchdog state and launch a task to
asynchronously receive LSP packets from the worker (e.g. request responses).
- textDocument/didChange: Update the local file state. If the header was mutated,
signal a shutdown to the file worker by closing the I/O channels.
Then restart the file worker. Otherwise, forward the `didChange` notification.
- textDocument/didClose: Signal a shutdown to the file worker and remove the associated watchdog state.
Moreover, we don't implement the full protocol at this level:
- Upon starting, the `initialize` request is forwarded to the worker, but it must not respond with its server
capabilities. Consequently, the watchdog will not send an `initialized` notification to the worker.
- After `initialize`, the watchdog sends the corresponding `didOpen` notification with the full current state of
the file. No additional `didOpen` notifications will be forwarded to the worker process.
- `$/cancelRequest` notifications are forwarded to all file workers.
- File workers are always terminated with an `exit` notification, without previously receiving a `shutdown` request.
Similarly, they never receive a `didClose` notification.
## Watchdog <-> client communication
The watchdog itself should implement the LSP standard as closely as possible. However we reserve the right to add
non-standard extensions in case they're needed, for example to communicate tactic state.
-/
namespace Lean.Server.Watchdog
open IO
open Std (RBMap RBMap.empty)
open Lsp
open JsonRpc
section Utils
structure OpenDocument where
meta : DocumentMeta
headerAst : Syntax
def workerCfg : Process.StdioConfig := {
stdin := Process.Stdio.piped
stdout := Process.Stdio.piped
-- We pass workers' stderr through to the editor.
stderr := Process.Stdio.inherit
}
/-- Events that worker-specific tasks signal to the main thread. -/
inductive WorkerEvent where
/- A synthetic event signalling that the grouped edits should be processed. -/
| processGroupedEdits
| terminated
| crashed (e : IO.Error)
| ioError (e : IO.Error)
inductive WorkerState where
/- The watchdog can detect a crashed file worker in two places: When trying to send a message to the file worker
and when reading a request reply.
In the latter case, the forwarding task terminates and delegates a `crashed` event to the main task.
Then, in both cases, the file worker has its state set to `crashed` and requests that are in-flight are errored.
Upon receiving the next packet for that file worker, the file worker is restarted and the packet is forwarded
to it. If the crash was detected while writing a packet, we queue that packet until the next packet for the file
worker arrives. -/
| crashed (queuedMsgs : Array JsonRpc.Message)
| running
abbrev PendingRequestMap := RBMap RequestID JsonRpc.Message (fun a b => Decidable.decide (a < b))
private def parseHeaderAst (input : String) : IO Syntax := do
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext input "<input>"
let (stx, _, _) ← Parser.parseHeader inputCtx
return stx
end Utils
section FileWorker
/-- A group of edits which will be processed at a future instant. -/
structure GroupedEdits where
/-- When to process the edits. -/
applyTime : Nat
params : DidChangeTextDocumentParams
/-- Signals when `applyTime` has been reached. -/
signalTask : Task WorkerEvent
structure FileWorker where
doc : OpenDocument
proc : Process.Child workerCfg
commTask : Task WorkerEvent
state : WorkerState
-- This should not be mutated outside of namespace FileWorker, as it is used as shared mutable state
pendingRequestsRef : IO.Ref PendingRequestMap
groupedEditsRef : IO.Ref (Option GroupedEdits)
namespace FileWorker
variable [ToJson α]
def stdin (fw : FileWorker) : FS.Stream :=
FS.Stream.ofHandle fw.proc.stdin
def stdout (fw : FileWorker) : FS.Stream :=
FS.Stream.ofHandle fw.proc.stdout
def readMessage (fw : FileWorker) : IO JsonRpc.Message := do
let msg ← fw.stdout.readLspMessage
if let Message.response id _ := msg then
fw.pendingRequestsRef.modify (fun pendingRequests => pendingRequests.erase id)
if let Message.responseError id _ _ _ := msg then
fw.pendingRequestsRef.modify (fun pendingRequests => pendingRequests.erase id)
return msg
def writeMessage (fw : FileWorker) (msg : JsonRpc.Message) : IO Unit :=
fw.stdin.writeLspMessage msg
def writeNotification (fw : FileWorker) (n : Notification α) : IO Unit :=
fw.stdin.writeLspNotification n
def writeRequest (fw : FileWorker) (r : Request α) : IO Unit := do
fw.stdin.writeLspRequest r
fw.pendingRequestsRef.modify (fun pendingRequests => pendingRequests.insert r.id r)
def errorPendingRequests (fw : FileWorker) (hError : FS.Stream) (code : ErrorCode) (msg : String) : IO Unit := do
let pendingRequests ← fw.pendingRequestsRef.modifyGet (fun pendingRequests => (pendingRequests, RBMap.empty))
for ⟨id, _⟩ in pendingRequests do
hError.writeLspResponseError { id := id, code := code, message := msg }
partial def runEditsSignalTask (fw : FileWorker) : IO (Task WorkerEvent) := do
let rec loopAction : IO WorkerEvent := do
let now ← monoMsNow
let some ge ← fw.groupedEditsRef.get
| throwServerError "Internal error: empty grouped edits reference in signal task"
if ge.applyTime ≤ now then
return WorkerEvent.processGroupedEdits
else
IO.sleep <| UInt32.ofNat <| ge.applyTime - now
loopAction
let t ← IO.asTask loopAction
return t.map fun
| Except.ok ev => ev
| Except.error e => WorkerEvent.ioError e
end FileWorker
end FileWorker
section ServerM
abbrev FileWorkerMap := RBMap DocumentUri FileWorker (fun a b => Decidable.decide (a < b))
structure ServerContext where
hIn : FS.Stream
hOut : FS.Stream
hLog : FS.Stream
/-- Command line arguments. -/
args : List String
fileWorkersRef : IO.Ref FileWorkerMap
/-- We store these to pass them to workers. -/
initParams : InitializeParams
editDelay : Nat
workerPath : String
abbrev ServerM := ReaderT ServerContext IO
def updateFileWorkers (val : FileWorker) : ServerM Unit := do
(←read).fileWorkersRef.modify (fun fileWorkers => fileWorkers.insert val.doc.meta.uri val)
def findFileWorker (uri : DocumentUri) : ServerM FileWorker := do
match (←(←read).fileWorkersRef.get).find? uri with
| some fw => fw
| none => throwServerError s!"Got unknown document URI ({uri})"
def eraseFileWorker (uri : DocumentUri) : ServerM Unit := do
(←read).fileWorkersRef.modify (fun fileWorkers => fileWorkers.erase uri)
def log (msg : String) : ServerM Unit := do
let st ← read
st.hLog.putStrLn msg
st.hLog.flush
/-- Creates a Task which forwards a worker's messages into the output stream until an event
which must be handled in the main watchdog thread (e.g. an I/O error) happens. -/
private partial def forwardMessages (fw : FileWorker) : ServerM (Task WorkerEvent) := do
let o := (←read).hOut
let rec loop : ServerM WorkerEvent := do
try
let msg ← fw.readMessage
-- Writes to Lean I/O channels are atomic, so these won't trample on each other.
o.writeLspMessage msg
catch err =>
-- If writeLspMessage from above errors we will block here, but the main task will
-- quit eventually anyways if that happens
let exitCode ← fw.proc.wait
if exitCode = 0 then
-- Worker was terminated
fw.errorPendingRequests o ErrorCode.contentModified
("The file worker has been terminated. Either the header has changed,"
++ " or the file was closed, or the server is shutting down.")
return WorkerEvent.terminated
else
-- Worker crashed
fw.errorPendingRequests o ErrorCode.internalError
s!"Server process for {fw.doc.meta.uri} crashed, {if exitCode = 1 then "see stderr for exception" else "likely due to a stack overflow in user code"}."
return WorkerEvent.crashed err
loop
let task ← IO.asTask (loop $ ←read) Task.Priority.dedicated
task.map $ fun
| Except.ok ev => ev
| Except.error e => WorkerEvent.ioError e
def startFileWorker (m : DocumentMeta) : ServerM Unit := do
let st ← read
let headerAst ← parseHeaderAst m.text.source
let workerProc ← Process.spawn {
toStdioConfig := workerCfg
cmd := st.workerPath
args := #["--worker"] ++ st.args.toArray
}
let pendingRequestsRef ← IO.mkRef (RBMap.empty : PendingRequestMap)
-- The task will never access itself, so this is fine
let fw : FileWorker := {
doc := ⟨m, headerAst⟩
proc := workerProc
commTask := Task.pure WorkerEvent.terminated
state := WorkerState.running
pendingRequestsRef := pendingRequestsRef
groupedEditsRef := ← IO.mkRef none
}
let commTask ← forwardMessages fw
let fw : FileWorker := { fw with commTask := commTask }
fw.stdin.writeLspRequest ⟨0, "initialize", st.initParams⟩
fw.writeNotification {
method := "textDocument/didOpen"
param := {
textDocument := {
uri := m.uri
languageId := "lean"
version := m.version
text := m.text.source
} : DidOpenTextDocumentParams
}
}
updateFileWorkers fw
def terminateFileWorker (uri : DocumentUri) : ServerM Unit := do
/- The file worker must have crashed just when we were about to terminate it!
That's fine - just forget about it then.
(on didClose we won't need the crashed file worker anymore,
when the header changed we'll start a new one right after
anyways and when we're shutting down the server
it's over either way.) -/
try (←findFileWorker uri).writeMessage (Message.notification "exit" none)
catch err => ()
eraseFileWorker uri
def handleCrash (uri : DocumentUri) (queuedMsgs : Array JsonRpc.Message) : ServerM Unit := do
updateFileWorkers { ←findFileWorker uri with state := WorkerState.crashed queuedMsgs }
/-- Tries to write a message, sets the state of the FileWorker to `crashed` if it does not succeed
and restarts the file worker if the `crashed` flag was already set.
Messages that couldn't be sent can be queued up via the queueFailedMessage flag and
will be discharged after the FileWorker is restarted. -/
def tryWriteMessage [Coe α JsonRpc.Message] (uri : DocumentUri) (msg : α) (writeAction : FileWorker → α → IO Unit)
(queueFailedMessage := true) (restartCrashedWorker := false) : ServerM Unit := do
let fw ← findFileWorker uri
match fw.state with
| WorkerState.crashed queuedMsgs =>
let mut queuedMsgs := queuedMsgs
if queueFailedMessage then
queuedMsgs := queuedMsgs.push msg
if !restartCrashedWorker then
return
-- restart the crashed FileWorker
eraseFileWorker uri
startFileWorker fw.doc.meta
let newFw ← findFileWorker uri
let mut crashedMsgs := #[]
-- try to discharge all queued msgs, tracking the ones that we can't discharge
for msg in queuedMsgs do
try
newFw.writeMessage msg
catch _ =>
crashedMsgs := crashedMsgs.push msg
if ¬ crashedMsgs.isEmpty then
handleCrash uri crashedMsgs
| WorkerState.running =>
let initialQueuedMsgs :=
if queueFailedMessage then
#[msg]
else
#[]
try
writeAction fw msg
catch _ =>
handleCrash uri (initialQueuedMsgs.map Coe.coe)
end ServerM
section NotificationHandling
def handleDidOpen (p : DidOpenTextDocumentParams) : ServerM Unit :=
let doc := p.textDocument
/- NOTE(WN): `toFileMap` marks line beginnings as immediately following
"\n", which should be enough to handle both LF and CRLF correctly.
This is because LSP always refers to characters by (line, column),
so if we get the line number correct it shouldn't matter that there
is a CR there. -/
startFileWorker ⟨doc.uri, doc.version, doc.text.toFileMap⟩
def handleEdits (fw : FileWorker) : ServerM Unit := do
let some ge ← fw.groupedEditsRef.modifyGet (·, none)
| throwServerError "Internal error: empty grouped edits reference"
let doc := ge.params.textDocument
let changes := ge.params.contentChanges
let oldDoc := fw.doc
let some newVersion ← pure doc.version?
| throwServerError "Expected version number"
if newVersion <= oldDoc.meta.version then
throwServerError "Got outdated version number"
if changes.isEmpty then
return
let (newDocText, _) := foldDocumentChanges changes oldDoc.meta.text
let newMeta : DocumentMeta := ⟨doc.uri, newVersion, newDocText⟩
let newHeaderAst ← parseHeaderAst newDocText.source
if newHeaderAst != oldDoc.headerAst then
terminateFileWorker doc.uri
startFileWorker newMeta
else
let newDoc : OpenDocument := ⟨newMeta, oldDoc.headerAst⟩
updateFileWorkers { fw with doc := newDoc }
tryWriteMessage doc.uri ⟨"textDocument/didChange", ge.params⟩ FileWorker.writeNotification (restartCrashedWorker := true)
def handleDidClose (p : DidCloseTextDocumentParams) : ServerM Unit :=
terminateFileWorker p.textDocument.uri
def handleCancelRequest (p : CancelParams) : ServerM Unit := do
let fileWorkers ← (←read).fileWorkersRef.get
for ⟨uri, fw⟩ in fileWorkers do
let req? ← fw.pendingRequestsRef.modifyGet (fun pendingRequests =>
(pendingRequests.find? p.id, pendingRequests.erase p.id))
if let some req := req? then
tryWriteMessage uri ⟨"$/cancelRequest", p⟩ FileWorker.writeNotification (queueFailedMessage := false)
end NotificationHandling
section MessageHandling
def parseParams (paramType : Type) [FromJson paramType] (params : Json) : ServerM paramType :=
match fromJson? params with
| some parsed => pure parsed
| none => throwServerError s!"Got param with wrong structure: {params.compress}"
def handleRequest (id : RequestID) (method : String) (params : Json) : ServerM Unit := do
let handle := fun α [FromJson α] [ToJson α] [FileSource α] => do
let parsedParams ← parseParams α params
let uri := fileSource parsedParams
tryWriteMessage uri ⟨id, method, parsedParams⟩ FileWorker.writeRequest
match method with
| "textDocument/waitForDiagnostics" => handle WaitForDiagnosticsParams
| "textDocument/hover" => handle HoverParams
| "textDocument/declaration" => handle DeclarationParams
| "textDocument/definition" => handle DefinitionParams
| "textDocument/typeDefinition" => handle TypeDefinitionParams
| "textDocument/documentHighlight" => handle DocumentHighlightParams
| "textDocument/documentSymbol" => handle DocumentSymbolParams
| "$/lean/plainGoal" => handle PlainGoalParams
| _ =>
(←read).hOut.writeLspResponseError
{ id := id
code := ErrorCode.methodNotFound
message := s!"Unsupported request method: {method}" }
def handleNotification (method : String) (params : Json) : ServerM Unit := do
let handle := (fun α [FromJson α] (handler : α → ServerM Unit) => parseParams α params >>= handler)
match method with
| "textDocument/didOpen" => handle DidOpenTextDocumentParams handleDidOpen
/- NOTE: textDocument/didChange is handled in the main loop. -/
| "textDocument/didClose" => handle DidCloseTextDocumentParams handleDidClose
| "$/cancelRequest" => handle CancelParams handleCancelRequest
| _ => (←read).hLog.putStrLn s!"Got unsupported notification: {method}"
end MessageHandling
section MainLoop
def shutdown : ServerM Unit := do
let fileWorkers ← (←read).fileWorkersRef.get
for ⟨uri, _⟩ in fileWorkers do
terminateFileWorker uri
for ⟨_, fw⟩ in fileWorkers do
discard <| IO.wait fw.commTask
inductive ServerEvent where
| workerEvent (fw : FileWorker) (ev : WorkerEvent)
| clientMsg (msg : JsonRpc.Message)
| clientError (e : IO.Error)
def runClientTask : ServerM (Task ServerEvent) := do
let st ← read
let readMsgAction : IO ServerEvent := do
/- Runs asynchronously. -/
let msg ← st.hIn.readLspMessage
ServerEvent.clientMsg msg
let clientTask := (←IO.asTask readMsgAction).map $ fun
| Except.ok ev => ev
| Except.error e => ServerEvent.clientError e
return clientTask
partial def mainLoop (clientTask : Task ServerEvent) : ServerM Unit := do
let st ← read
let workers ← st.fileWorkersRef.get
let mut workerTasks := #[]
for (_, fw) in workers do
if let WorkerState.running := fw.state then
workerTasks := workerTasks.push <| fw.commTask.map (ServerEvent.workerEvent fw)
if let some ge ← fw.groupedEditsRef.get then
workerTasks := workerTasks.push <| ge.signalTask.map (ServerEvent.workerEvent fw)
let ev ← IO.waitAny (workerTasks.push clientTask |>.toList)
match ev with
| ServerEvent.clientMsg msg =>
match msg with
| Message.request id "shutdown" _ =>
shutdown
st.hOut.writeLspResponse ⟨id, Json.null⟩
| Message.request id method (some params) =>
handleRequest id method (toJson params)
mainLoop (←runClientTask)
| Message.notification "textDocument/didChange" (some params) =>
let p ← parseParams DidChangeTextDocumentParams (toJson params)
let fw ← findFileWorker p.textDocument.uri
let now ← monoMsNow
/- We wait `editDelay`ms since last edit before applying the changes. -/
let applyTime := now + st.editDelay
let startingGroup? ← fw.groupedEditsRef.modifyGet fun
| some ge => (false, some { ge with applyTime := applyTime
params.textDocument := p.textDocument
params.contentChanges := ge.params.contentChanges ++ p.contentChanges } )
| none => (true, some { applyTime := applyTime
params := p
/- This is overwritten just below. -/
signalTask := Task.pure WorkerEvent.processGroupedEdits } )
if startingGroup? then
let t ← fw.runEditsSignalTask
fw.groupedEditsRef.modify (Option.map fun ge => { ge with signalTask := t } )
mainLoop (←runClientTask)
| Message.notification method (some params) =>
handleNotification method (toJson params)
mainLoop (←runClientTask)
| _ => throwServerError "Got invalid JSON-RPC message"
| ServerEvent.clientError e => throw e
| ServerEvent.workerEvent fw ev =>
match ev with
| WorkerEvent.processGroupedEdits =>
handleEdits fw
mainLoop clientTask
| WorkerEvent.ioError e =>
throwServerError s!"IO error while processing events for {fw.doc.meta.uri}: {e}"
| WorkerEvent.crashed e =>
handleCrash fw.doc.meta.uri #[]
mainLoop clientTask
| WorkerEvent.terminated =>
throwServerError "Internal server error: got termination event for worker that should have been removed"
end MainLoop
def mkLeanServerCapabilities : ServerCapabilities := {
textDocumentSync? := some {
openClose := true
change := TextDocumentSyncKind.incremental
willSave := false
willSaveWaitUntil := false
save? := none
}
hoverProvider := true
declarationProvider := true
definitionProvider := true
typeDefinitionProvider := true
documentHighlightProvider := true
documentSymbolProvider := true
}
def initAndRunWatchdogAux : ServerM Unit := do
let st ← read
try
discard $ st.hIn.readLspNotificationAs "initialized" InitializedParams
let clientTask ← runClientTask
mainLoop clientTask
let Message.notification "exit" none ← st.hIn.readLspMessage
| throwServerError "Expected an exit notification"
catch err =>
shutdown
throw err
def initAndRunWatchdog (args : List String) (i o e : FS.Stream) : IO Unit := do
let mut workerPath ← IO.appPath
if let some path := (←IO.getEnv "LEAN_SYSROOT") then
workerPath := s!"{path}/bin/lean{System.FilePath.exeSuffix}"
if let some path := (←IO.getEnv "LEAN_WORKER_PATH") then
workerPath := path
let fileWorkersRef ← IO.mkRef (RBMap.empty : FileWorkerMap)
let i ← maybeTee "wdIn.txt" false i
let o ← maybeTee "wdOut.txt" true o
let e ← maybeTee "wdErr.txt" true e
let initRequest ← i.readLspRequestAs "initialize" InitializeParams
o.writeLspResponse {
id := initRequest.id
result := {
capabilities := mkLeanServerCapabilities
serverInfo? := some {
name := "Lean 4 server"
version? := "0.0.1"
}
: InitializeResult
}
}
ReaderT.run initAndRunWatchdogAux {
hIn := i
hOut := o
hLog := e
args := args
fileWorkersRef := fileWorkersRef
initParams := initRequest.param
editDelay := initRequest.param.initializationOptions? |>.bind InitializationOptions.editDelay? |>.getD 200
workerPath := workerPath
: ServerContext
}
@[export lean_server_watchdog_main]
def watchdogMain (args : List String) : IO UInt32 := do
let i ← IO.getStdin
let o ← IO.getStdout
let e ← IO.getStderr
try
initAndRunWatchdog args i o e
return 0
catch err =>
e.putStrLn s!"Watchdog error: {err}"
return 1
end Lean.Server.Watchdog
|
a13143f9b43fbef62622ca83c5f2e5b60265390c | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/algebra/gcd_monoid.lean | 849561f47a7d123f3d2c8cdafd1b05799d3627e9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,161 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
TODO: Provide a GCD monoid instance for `ℕ`, port GCD facts about nats
TODO: Generalize normalization monoids commutative (cancellative) monoids with or without zero
TODO: Generalize GCD monoid to not require normalization in all cases
-/
import algebra.associated
/-!
# Monoids with normalization functions, `gcd`, and `lcm`
This file defines extra structures on `comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero`s, including `integral_domain`s.
## Main Definitions
* `normalization_monoid`
* `gcd_monoid`
* `gcd_monoid_of_exists_gcd`
* `gcd_monoid_of_exists_lcm`
## Implementation Notes
* `normalization_monoid` is defined by assigning to each element a `norm_unit` such that multiplying
by that unit normalizes the monoid, and `normalize` is an idempotent monoid homomorphism. This
definition as currently implemented does casework on `0`.
* `gcd_monoid` extends `normalization_monoid`, so the `gcd` and `lcm` are always normalized.
This makes `gcd`s of polynomials easier to work with, but excludes Euclidean domains, and monoids
without zero.
* `gcd_monoid_of_gcd` noncomputably constructs a `gcd_monoid` structure just from the `gcd`
and its properties.
* `gcd_monoid_of_exists_gcd` noncomputably constructs a `gcd_monoid` structure just from a proof
that any two elements have a (not necessarily normalized) `gcd`.
* `gcd_monoid_of_lcm` noncomputably constructs a `gcd_monoid` structure just from the `lcm`
and its properties.
* `gcd_monoid_of_exists_lcm` noncomputably constructs a `gcd_monoid` structure just from a proof
that any two elements have a (not necessarily normalized) `lcm`.
## TODO
* Provide a GCD monoid instance for `ℕ`, port GCD facts about nats, definition of coprime
* Generalize normalization monoids to commutative (cancellative) monoids with or without zero
* Generalize GCD monoid to not require normalization in all cases
## Tags
divisibility, gcd, lcm, normalize
-/
variables {α : Type*}
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- Normalization monoid: multiplying with `norm_unit` gives a normal form for associated
elements. -/
@[protect_proj] class normalization_monoid (α : Type*) [nontrivial α]
[comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] :=
(norm_unit : α → units α)
(norm_unit_zero : norm_unit 0 = 1)
(norm_unit_mul : ∀{a b}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → norm_unit (a * b) = norm_unit a * norm_unit b)
(norm_unit_coe_units : ∀(u : units α), norm_unit u = u⁻¹)
export normalization_monoid (norm_unit norm_unit_zero norm_unit_mul norm_unit_coe_units)
attribute [simp] norm_unit_coe_units norm_unit_zero norm_unit_mul
section normalization_monoid
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] [nontrivial α] [normalization_monoid α]
@[simp] theorem norm_unit_one : norm_unit (1:α) = 1 :=
norm_unit_coe_units 1
/-- Chooses an element of each associate class, by multiplying by `norm_unit` -/
def normalize : monoid_with_zero_hom α α :=
{ to_fun := λ x, x * norm_unit x,
map_zero' := by simp,
map_one' := by rw [norm_unit_one, units.coe_one, mul_one],
map_mul' := λ x y,
classical.by_cases (λ hx : x = 0, by rw [hx, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]) $ λ hx,
classical.by_cases (λ hy : y = 0, by rw [hy, mul_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero]) $ λ hy,
by simp only [norm_unit_mul hx hy, units.coe_mul]; simp only [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm y], }
theorem associated_normalize {x : α} : associated x (normalize x) :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem normalize_associated {x : α} : associated (normalize x) x :=
associated_normalize.symm
lemma associates.mk_normalize {x : α} : associates.mk (normalize x) = associates.mk x :=
associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 normalize_associated
@[simp] lemma normalize_apply {x : α} : normalize x = x * norm_unit x := rfl
@[simp] lemma normalize_zero : normalize (0 : α) = 0 := normalize.map_zero
@[simp] lemma normalize_one : normalize (1 : α) = 1 := normalize.map_one
lemma normalize_coe_units (u : units α) : normalize (u : α) = 1 := by simp
lemma normalize_eq_zero {x : α} : normalize x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ hx, (associated_zero_iff_eq_zero x).1 $ hx ▸ associated_normalize,
by rintro rfl; exact normalize_zero⟩
lemma normalize_eq_one {x : α} : normalize x = 1 ↔ is_unit x :=
⟨λ hx, is_unit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨_, hx⟩, λ ⟨u, hu⟩, hu ▸ normalize_coe_units u⟩
@[simp] theorem norm_unit_mul_norm_unit (a : α) : norm_unit (a * norm_unit a) = 1 :=
classical.by_cases (assume : a = 0, by simp only [this, norm_unit_zero, zero_mul]) $
assume h, by rw [norm_unit_mul h (units.ne_zero _), norm_unit_coe_units, mul_inv_eq_one]
theorem normalize_idem (x : α) : normalize (normalize x) = normalize x := by simp
theorem normalize_eq_normalize {a b : α}
(hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) : normalize a = normalize b :=
begin
rcases associated_of_dvd_dvd hab hba with ⟨u, rfl⟩,
refine classical.by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul]) (assume ha : a ≠ 0, _),
suffices : a * ↑(norm_unit a) = a * ↑u * ↑(norm_unit a) * ↑u⁻¹,
by simpa only [normalize_apply, mul_assoc, norm_unit_mul ha u.ne_zero, norm_unit_coe_units],
calc a * ↑(norm_unit a) = a * ↑(norm_unit a) * ↑u * ↑u⁻¹:
(units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
... = a * ↑u * ↑(norm_unit a) * ↑u⁻¹ : by rw mul_right_comm a
end
lemma normalize_eq_normalize_iff {x y : α} : normalize x = normalize y ↔ x ∣ y ∧ y ∣ x :=
⟨λ h, ⟨units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h.symm⟩, units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h⟩⟩,
λ ⟨hxy, hyx⟩, normalize_eq_normalize hxy hyx⟩
theorem dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq {a b : α}
(ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b) (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
a = b :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ normalize_eq_normalize hab hba
--can be proven by simp
lemma dvd_normalize_iff {a b : α} : a ∣ normalize b ↔ a ∣ b :=
units.dvd_mul_right
--can be proven by simp
lemma normalize_dvd_iff {a b : α} : normalize a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
units.mul_right_dvd
end normalization_monoid
namespace comm_group_with_zero
variables [decidable_eq α] [comm_group_with_zero α]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance : normalization_monoid α :=
{ norm_unit := λ x, if h : x = 0 then 1 else (units.mk0 x h)⁻¹,
norm_unit_zero := dif_pos rfl,
norm_unit_mul := λ x y x0 y0, units.eq_iff.1 (by simp [x0, y0, mul_inv']),
norm_unit_coe_units := λ u, by { rw [dif_neg (units.ne_zero _), units.mk0_coe], apply_instance } }
@[simp]
lemma coe_norm_unit {a : α} (h0 : a ≠ 0) : (↑(norm_unit a) : α) = a⁻¹ :=
by simp [norm_unit, h0]
end comm_group_with_zero
namespace associates
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] [nontrivial α] [normalization_monoid α]
local attribute [instance] associated.setoid
/-- Maps an element of `associates` back to the normalized element of its associate class -/
protected def out : associates α → α :=
quotient.lift (normalize : α → α) $ λ a b ⟨u, hu⟩, hu ▸
normalize_eq_normalize ⟨_, rfl⟩ (units.mul_right_dvd.2 $ dvd_refl a)
lemma out_mk (a : α) : (associates.mk a).out = normalize a := rfl
@[simp] lemma out_one : (1 : associates α).out = 1 :=
normalize_one
lemma out_mul (a b : associates α) : (a * b).out = a.out * b.out :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ assume a b,
by simp only [associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, out_mk, mk_mul_mk, normalize.map_mul]
lemma dvd_out_iff (a : α) (b : associates α) : a ∣ b.out ↔ associates.mk a ≤ b :=
quotient.induction_on b $
by simp [associates.out_mk, associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd_iff]
lemma out_dvd_iff (a : α) (b : associates α) : b.out ∣ a ↔ b ≤ associates.mk a :=
quotient.induction_on b $
by simp [associates.out_mk, associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd_iff]
@[simp] lemma out_top : (⊤ : associates α).out = 0 :=
normalize_zero
@[simp] lemma normalize_out (a : associates α) : normalize a.out = a.out :=
quotient.induction_on a normalize_idem
end associates
/-- GCD monoid: a `comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero` with normalization and `gcd`
(greatest common divisor) and `lcm` (least common multiple) operations. In this setting `gcd` and
`lcm` form a bounded lattice on the associated elements where `gcd` is the infimum, `lcm` is the
supremum, `1` is bottom, and `0` is top. The type class focuses on `gcd` and we derive the
corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
@[protect_proj] class gcd_monoid (α : Type*) [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] [nontrivial α]
extends normalization_monoid α :=
(gcd : α → α → α)
(lcm : α → α → α)
(gcd_dvd_left : ∀a b, gcd a b ∣ a)
(gcd_dvd_right : ∀a b, gcd a b ∣ b)
(dvd_gcd : ∀{a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b)
(normalize_gcd : ∀a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b)
(gcd_mul_lcm : ∀a b, gcd a b * lcm a b = normalize (a * b))
(lcm_zero_left : ∀a, lcm 0 a = 0)
(lcm_zero_right : ∀a, lcm a 0 = 0)
export gcd_monoid (gcd lcm gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right dvd_gcd lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right)
attribute [simp] lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right
section gcd_monoid
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] [nontrivial α] [gcd_monoid α]
@[simp] theorem normalize_gcd : ∀a b:α, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b :=
gcd_monoid.normalize_gcd
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_lcm : ∀a b:α, gcd a b * lcm a b = normalize (a * b) :=
gcd_monoid.gcd_mul_lcm
section gcd
theorem dvd_gcd_iff (a b c : α) : a ∣ gcd b c ↔ (a ∣ b ∧ a ∣ c) :=
iff.intro
(assume h, ⟨dvd_trans h (gcd_dvd_left _ _), dvd_trans h (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩)
(assume ⟨hab, hac⟩, dvd_gcd hab hac)
theorem gcd_comm (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_assoc (m n k : α) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd
(dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd (dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_right m n))
(gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) (dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
(dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
instance : is_commutative α gcd := ⟨gcd_comm⟩
instance : is_associative α gcd := ⟨gcd_assoc⟩
theorem gcd_eq_normalize {a b c : α} (habc : gcd a b ∣ c) (hcab : c ∣ gcd a b) :
gcd a b = normalize c :=
normalize_gcd a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
@[simp] theorem gcd_zero_left (a : α) : gcd 0 a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp] theorem gcd_zero_right (a : α) : gcd a 0 = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
@[simp] theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a b : α) : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
iff.intro
(assume h, let ⟨ca, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left a b, ⟨cb, hb⟩ := gcd_dvd_right a b in
by rw [h, zero_mul] at ha hb; exact ⟨ha, hb⟩)
(assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, by rw [ha, hb, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero])
@[simp] theorem gcd_one_left (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp] theorem gcd_one_right (a : α) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (one_dvd _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd {a b c d: α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : gcd a c ∣ gcd b d :=
dvd_gcd (dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left _ _) hab) (dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_right _ _) hcd)
@[simp] theorem gcd_same (a : α) : gcd a a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_left (a b c : α) : gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * gcd b c :=
classical.by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero]) $
assume ha : a ≠ 0,
suffices gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * gcd b c),
by simpa only [normalize.map_mul, normalize_gcd],
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c) in
gcd_eq_normalize
(eq.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left a $ show d ∣ gcd b c, from
dvd_gcd
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 $ eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 $ eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _))
(dvd_gcd
(mul_dvd_mul_left a $ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
(mul_dvd_mul_left a $ gcd_dvd_right _ _))
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_right (a b c : α) : gcd (b * a) (c * a) = gcd b c * normalize a :=
by simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left]
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) : gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
iff.intro (assume eq, eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _) $
assume hab, dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) h (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
(dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) hab)
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) : gcd a b = b ↔ b ∣ a :=
by simpa only [gcd_comm a b] using gcd_eq_left_iff b a h
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) (dvd_refl _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_refl _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_refl _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_refl _) (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_eq_of_associated_left {m n : α} (h : associated m n) (k : α) : gcd m k = gcd n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_of_associated h) (dvd_refl _))
(gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_of_associated h.symm) (dvd_refl _))
theorem gcd_eq_of_associated_right {m n : α} (h : associated m n) (k : α) : gcd k m = gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_refl _) (dvd_of_associated h))
(gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_refl _) (dvd_of_associated h.symm))
lemma dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ (gcd k m) * n :=
begin
transitivity gcd k m * normalize n,
{ rw ← gcd_mul_right,
exact dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) H },
{ apply dvd.intro ↑(norm_unit n)⁻¹,
rw [normalize_apply, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← units.coe_mul],
simp }
end
lemma dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m * gcd k n :=
by { rw mul_comm at H ⊢, exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H }
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
Note: In general, this representation is highly non-unique. -/
lemma exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) :
∃ d₁ (hd₁ : d₁ ∣ m) d₂ (hd₂ : d₂ ∣ n), k = d₁ * d₂ :=
begin
by_cases h0 : gcd k m = 0,
{ rw gcd_eq_zero_iff at h0,
rcases h0 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨0, dvd_refl 0, n, dvd_refl n, _⟩,
simp },
{ obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left k m,
refine ⟨gcd k m, gcd_dvd_right _ _, a, _, ha⟩,
suffices h : gcd k m * a ∣ gcd k m * n,
{ cases h with b hb,
use b,
rw mul_assoc at hb,
apply mul_left_cancel' h0 hb },
rw ← ha,
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H }
end
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd (k m n : α) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n :=
begin
obtain ⟨m', hm', n', hn', h⟩ := (exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul $ gcd_dvd_right k (m * n)),
replace h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n' := h,
rw h,
have hm'n' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _,
apply mul_dvd_mul,
{ have hm'k : m' ∣ k := dvd_trans (dvd_mul_right m' n') hm'n',
exact dvd_gcd hm'k hm' },
{ have hn'k : n' ∣ k := dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left n' m') hm'n',
exact dvd_gcd hn'k hn' }
end
theorem gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd {a b : α} {k : ℕ} : gcd a (b ^ k) ∣ (gcd a b) ^ k :=
begin
by_cases hg : gcd a b = 0,
{ rw gcd_eq_zero_iff at hg,
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
simp },
{ induction k with k hk, simp,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ],
transitivity gcd a b * gcd a (b ^ k),
apply gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd a b (b ^ k),
refine (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hg).mpr hk }
end
theorem gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd {a b : α} {k : ℕ} : gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ (gcd a b) ^ k :=
by { rw [gcd_comm, gcd_comm a b], exact gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd }
theorem pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow {a b c d₁ d₂ : α} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(hab : gcd a b = 1) {k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) (hc : c = d₁ * d₂)
(hd₁ : d₁ ∣ a) : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 ∧ d₁ ^ k ∣ a :=
begin
have h1 : gcd (d₁ ^ k) b = 1,
{ rw ← normalize_gcd (d₁ ^ k) b, rw normalize_eq_one,
apply is_unit_of_dvd_one,
transitivity (gcd d₁ b) ^ k,
{ exact gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd },
{ apply is_unit.dvd, apply is_unit.pow, apply is_unit_of_dvd_one,
rw ← hab, apply gcd_dvd_gcd hd₁ (dvd_refl b) } },
have h2 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a * b, { use d₂ ^ k, rw [h, hc], exact mul_pow d₁ d₂ k },
rw mul_comm at h2,
have h3 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a, { rw [← one_mul a, ← h1], apply dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul h2 },
have h4 : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0,
{ intro hdk, rw hdk at h3, apply absurd (zero_dvd_iff.mp h3) ha },
tauto
end
theorem exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow {a b c : α} (hab : gcd a b = 1) {k : ℕ}
(h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ (d : α), associated (d ^ k) a :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ use 0, rw ha,
by_cases hk : k = 0,
{ exfalso, revert h, rw [ha, hk, zero_mul, pow_zero], apply zero_ne_one },
{ rw zero_pow (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hk) }},
by_cases hb : b = 0,
{ rw [hb, gcd_zero_right] at hab, use 1, rw one_pow,
apply (associated_one_iff_is_unit.mpr (normalize_eq_one.mp hab)).symm },
by_cases hk : k = 0,
{ use 1, rw [hk, pow_zero] at h ⊢, use units.mk_of_mul_eq_one _ _ h,
rw [units.coe_mk_of_mul_eq_one, one_mul] },
have hc : c ∣ a * b, { rw h, refine dvd_pow (dvd_refl c) hk },
obtain ⟨d₁, hd₁, d₂, hd₂, hc⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul hc,
use d₁,
obtain ⟨h0₁, ⟨a', ha'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow ha hab h hc hd₁,
rw [mul_comm] at h hc, rw [gcd_comm] at hab,
obtain ⟨h0₂, ⟨b', hb'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow hb hab h hc hd₂,
rw [ha', hb', hc, mul_pow] at h,
have h' : a' * b' = 1,
{ apply (mul_right_inj' h0₁).mp, rw mul_one,
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₂).mp, rw ← h,
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm a', ← mul_assoc (d₁ ^ k), ← mul_assoc _ (d₁ ^ k), mul_comm b'] },
use units.mk_of_mul_eq_one _ _ h',
rw [units.coe_mk_of_mul_eq_one, ha']
end
end gcd
section lcm
lemma lcm_dvd_iff {a b c : α} : lcm a b ∣ c ↔ a ∣ c ∧ b ∣ c :=
classical.by_cases
(assume : a = 0 ∨ b = 0, by rcases this with rfl | rfl;
simp only [iff_def, lcm_zero_left, lcm_zero_right, zero_dvd_iff, dvd_zero,
eq_self_iff_true, and_true, imp_true_iff] {contextual:=tt})
(assume this : ¬ (a = 0 ∨ b = 0),
let ⟨h1, h2⟩ := not_or_distrib.1 this in
have h : gcd a b ≠ 0, from λ H, h1 ((gcd_eq_zero_iff _ _).1 H).1,
by rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h, gcd_mul_lcm, normalize_dvd_iff, ← dvd_normalize_iff,
normalize.map_mul, normalize_gcd, ← gcd_mul_right, dvd_gcd_iff,
mul_comm b c, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h1, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h2, and_comm])
lemma dvd_lcm_left (a b : α) : a ∣ lcm a b := (lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl _)).1
lemma dvd_lcm_right (a b : α) : b ∣ lcm a b := (lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl _)).2
lemma lcm_dvd {a b c : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcb : c ∣ b) : lcm a c ∣ b :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨hab, hcb⟩
@[simp] theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff (a b : α) : lcm a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
iff.intro
(assume h : lcm a b = 0,
have normalize (a * b) = 0,
by rw [← gcd_mul_lcm _ _, h, mul_zero],
by simpa only [normalize_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, units.ne_zero, or_false])
(by rintro (rfl | rfl); [apply lcm_zero_left, apply lcm_zero_right])
@[simp] lemma normalize_lcm (a b : α) : normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b :=
classical.by_cases (assume : lcm a b = 0, by rw [this, normalize_zero]) $
assume h_lcm : lcm a b ≠ 0,
have h1 : gcd a b ≠ 0, from mt (by rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff, lcm_eq_zero_iff];
rintros ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; left; refl) h_lcm,
have h2 : normalize (gcd a b * lcm a b) = gcd a b * lcm a b,
by rw [gcd_mul_lcm, normalize_idem],
by simpa only [normalize.map_mul, normalize_gcd, one_mul, mul_right_inj' h1] using h2
theorem lcm_comm (a b : α) : lcm a b = lcm b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
theorem lcm_assoc (m n k : α) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _) (dvd.trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(dvd.trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(lcm_dvd
(dvd.trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd.trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
instance : is_commutative α lcm := ⟨lcm_comm⟩
instance : is_associative α lcm := ⟨lcm_assoc⟩
lemma lcm_eq_normalize {a b c : α} (habc : lcm a b ∣ c) (hcab : c ∣ lcm a b) :
lcm a b = normalize c :=
normalize_lcm a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : lcm a c ∣ lcm b d :=
lcm_dvd (dvd.trans hab (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (dvd.trans hcd (dvd_lcm_right _ _))
@[simp] theorem lcm_units_coe_left (u : units α) (a : α) : lcm ↑u a = normalize a :=
lcm_eq_normalize (lcm_dvd units.coe_dvd (dvd_refl _)) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)
@[simp] theorem lcm_units_coe_right (a : α) (u : units α) : lcm a ↑u = normalize a :=
(lcm_comm a u).trans $ lcm_units_coe_left _ _
@[simp] theorem lcm_one_left (a : α) : lcm 1 a = normalize a :=
lcm_units_coe_left 1 a
@[simp] theorem lcm_one_right (a : α) : lcm a 1 = normalize a :=
lcm_units_coe_right a 1
@[simp] theorem lcm_same (a : α) : lcm a a = normalize a :=
lcm_eq_normalize (lcm_dvd (dvd_refl _) (dvd_refl _)) (dvd_lcm_left _ _)
@[simp] theorem lcm_eq_one_iff (a b : α) : lcm a b = 1 ↔ a ∣ 1 ∧ b ∣ 1 :=
iff.intro
(assume eq, eq ▸ ⟨dvd_lcm_left _ _, dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
(assume ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, ⟨d, hd⟩⟩,
show lcm (units.mk_of_mul_eq_one a c hc.symm : α) (units.mk_of_mul_eq_one b d hd.symm) = 1,
by rw [lcm_units_coe_left, normalize_coe_units])
@[simp] theorem lcm_mul_left (a b c : α) : lcm (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * lcm b c :=
classical.by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, lcm_zero_left, normalize_zero]) $
assume ha : a ≠ 0,
suffices lcm (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * lcm b c),
by simpa only [normalize.map_mul, normalize_lcm],
have a ∣ lcm (a * b) (a * c), from dvd.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _),
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := this in
lcm_eq_normalize
(lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left a (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (mul_dvd_mul_left a (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(eq.symm ▸ (mul_dvd_mul_left a $ lcm_dvd
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 $ eq ▸ dvd_lcm_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 $ eq ▸ dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
@[simp] theorem lcm_mul_right (a b c : α) : lcm (b * a) (c * a) = lcm b c * normalize a :=
by simp only [mul_comm, lcm_mul_left]
theorem lcm_eq_left_iff (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) : lcm a b = a ↔ b ∣ a :=
iff.intro (assume eq, eq ▸ dvd_lcm_right _ _) $
assume hab, dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) h (lcm_dvd (dvd_refl a) hab)
(dvd_lcm_left _ _)
theorem lcm_eq_right_iff (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) : lcm a b = b ↔ a ∣ b :=
by simpa only [lcm_comm b a] using lcm_eq_left_iff b a h
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_left (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm (k * m) n :=
lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_mul_left _ _) (dvd_refl _)
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_right (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm (m * k) n :=
lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_refl _)
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_left_right (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm m (k * n) :=
lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_refl _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_right_right (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm m (n * k) :=
lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_refl _) (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem lcm_eq_of_associated_left {m n : α} (h : associated m n) (k : α) : lcm m k = lcm n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_of_associated h) (dvd_refl _))
(lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_of_associated h.symm) (dvd_refl _))
theorem lcm_eq_of_associated_right {m n : α} (h : associated m n) (k : α) : lcm k m = lcm k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_refl _) (dvd_of_associated h))
(lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_refl _) (dvd_of_associated h.symm))
end lcm
namespace gcd_monoid
theorem prime_of_irreducible {x : α} (hi: irreducible x) : prime x :=
⟨hi.ne_zero, ⟨hi.1, λ a b h,
begin
cases gcd_dvd_left x a with y hy,
cases hi.is_unit_or_is_unit hy with hu hu; cases hu with u hu,
{ right, transitivity (gcd (x * b) (a * b)), apply dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right x b) h,
rw gcd_mul_right, rw ← hu,
apply dvd_of_associated, transitivity (normalize b), symmetry, use u, apply mul_comm,
apply normalize_associated, },
{ left, rw [hy, ← hu],
transitivity, {apply dvd_of_associated, symmetry, use u}, apply gcd_dvd_right, }
end ⟩⟩
theorem irreducible_iff_prime {p : α} : irreducible p ↔ prime p :=
⟨prime_of_irreducible, irreducible_of_prime⟩
end gcd_monoid
end gcd_monoid
section unique_unit
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] [unique (units α)]
lemma units_eq_one (u : units α) : u = 1 := subsingleton.elim u 1
variable [nontrivial α]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normalization_monoid_of_unique_units : normalization_monoid α :=
{ norm_unit := λ x, 1,
norm_unit_zero := rfl,
norm_unit_mul := λ x y hx hy, (mul_one 1).symm,
norm_unit_coe_units := λ u, subsingleton.elim _ _ }
@[simp] lemma norm_unit_eq_one (x : α) : norm_unit x = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma normalize_eq (x : α) : normalize x = x := mul_one x
end unique_unit
section integral_domain
variables [integral_domain α] [gcd_monoid α]
lemma gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ b - c) : gcd a b = gcd a c :=
begin
apply dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _);
rw dvd_gcd_iff; refine ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, _⟩,
{ rcases h with ⟨d, hd⟩,
rcases gcd_dvd_right a b with ⟨e, he⟩,
rcases gcd_dvd_left a b with ⟨f, hf⟩,
use e - f * d,
rw [mul_sub, ← he, ← mul_assoc, ← hf, ← hd, sub_sub_cancel] },
{ rcases h with ⟨d, hd⟩,
rcases gcd_dvd_right a c with ⟨e, he⟩,
rcases gcd_dvd_left a c with ⟨f, hf⟩,
use e + f * d,
rw [mul_add, ← he, ← mul_assoc, ← hf, ← hd, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm c b, add_sub_cancel] }
end
lemma gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_left {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ b - c) : gcd b a = gcd c a :=
by rw [gcd_comm _ a, gcd_comm _ a, gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right h]
end integral_domain
section constructors
noncomputable theory
open associates
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] [nontrivial α]
private lemma map_mk_unit_aux [decidable_eq α] {f : associates α →* α}
(hinv : function.right_inverse f associates.mk) (a : α) :
a * ↑(classical.some (associated_map_mk hinv a)) = f (associates.mk a) :=
classical.some_spec (associated_map_mk hinv a)
/-- Define `normalization_monoid` on a structure from a `monoid_hom` inverse to `associates.mk`. -/
def normalization_monoid_of_monoid_hom_right_inverse [decidable_eq α] (f : associates α →* α)
(hinv : function.right_inverse f associates.mk) :
normalization_monoid α :=
{ norm_unit := λ a, if a = 0 then 1 else
classical.some (associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.1 (hinv (associates.mk a)).symm),
norm_unit_zero := if_pos rfl,
norm_unit_mul := λ a b ha hb, by {
rw [if_neg (mul_ne_zero ha hb), if_neg ha, if_neg hb, units.ext_iff, units.coe_mul],
suffices : (a * b) * ↑(classical.some (associated_map_mk hinv (a * b))) =
(a * ↑(classical.some (associated_map_mk hinv a))) *
(b * ↑(classical.some (associated_map_mk hinv b))),
{ apply mul_left_cancel' (mul_ne_zero ha hb) _,
simpa only [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using this },
rw [map_mk_unit_aux hinv a, map_mk_unit_aux hinv (a * b), map_mk_unit_aux hinv b,
← monoid_hom.map_mul, associates.mk_mul_mk] },
norm_unit_coe_units := λ u, by {
rw [if_neg (units.ne_zero u), units.ext_iff],
apply mul_left_cancel' (units.ne_zero u),
rw [units.mul_inv, map_mk_unit_aux hinv u,
associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (associated_one_iff_is_unit.2 ⟨u, rfl⟩),
associates.mk_one, monoid_hom.map_one] } }
variable [normalization_monoid α]
/-- Define `gcd_monoid` on a structure just from the `gcd` and its properties. -/
noncomputable def gcd_monoid_of_gcd [decidable_eq α] (gcd : α → α → α)
(gcd_dvd_left : ∀a b, gcd a b ∣ a)
(gcd_dvd_right : ∀a b, gcd a b ∣ b)
(dvd_gcd : ∀{a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b)
(normalize_gcd : ∀a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b) :
gcd_monoid α :=
{ gcd := gcd,
gcd_dvd_left := gcd_dvd_left,
gcd_dvd_right := gcd_dvd_right,
dvd_gcd := λ a b c, dvd_gcd,
normalize_gcd := normalize_gcd,
lcm := λ a b, if a = 0 then 0 else classical.some (dvd_normalize_iff.2
(dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left a b) (dvd.intro b rfl))),
gcd_mul_lcm := λ a b, by {
split_ifs with a0,
{ rw [mul_zero, a0, zero_mul, normalize_zero] },
{ exact (classical.some_spec (dvd_normalize_iff.2
(dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left a b) (dvd.intro b rfl)))).symm } },
lcm_zero_left := λ a, if_pos rfl,
lcm_zero_right := λ a, by {
split_ifs with a0, { refl },
rw ← normalize_eq_zero at a0,
have h := (classical.some_spec (dvd_normalize_iff.2
(dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd.intro 0 rfl)))).symm,
have gcd0 : gcd a 0 = normalize a,
{ rw ← normalize_gcd,
exact normalize_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero a)) },
rw ← gcd0 at a0,
apply or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.1 _) a0,
rw [h, mul_zero, normalize_zero] },
.. (infer_instance : normalization_monoid α) }
/-- Define `gcd_monoid` on a structure just from the `lcm` and its properties. -/
noncomputable def gcd_monoid_of_lcm [decidable_eq α] (lcm : α → α → α)
(dvd_lcm_left : ∀a b, a ∣ lcm a b)
(dvd_lcm_right : ∀a b, b ∣ lcm a b)
(lcm_dvd : ∀{a b c}, c ∣ a → b ∣ a → lcm c b ∣ a)
(normalize_lcm : ∀a b, normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b) :
gcd_monoid α :=
let exists_gcd := λ a b, dvd_normalize_iff.2 (lcm_dvd (dvd.intro b rfl) (dvd.intro_left a rfl)) in
{ lcm := lcm,
gcd := λ a b, if a = 0 then normalize b else (if b = 0 then normalize a else
classical.some (exists_gcd a b)),
gcd_mul_lcm := λ a b, by {
split_ifs,
{ rw [h, zero_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_lcm_left _ _), mul_zero, zero_mul, normalize_zero] },
{ rw [h_1, zero_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_lcm_right _ _), mul_zero, mul_zero, normalize_zero] },
apply eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) (classical.some_spec
(dvd_normalize_iff.2 (lcm_dvd (dvd.intro b rfl) (dvd.intro_left a rfl)))).symm },
normalize_gcd := λ a b, by {
split_ifs,
{ apply normalize_idem },
{ apply normalize_idem },
have h0 : lcm a b ≠ 0,
{ intro con,
have h := lcm_dvd (dvd.intro b rfl) (dvd.intro_left a rfl),
rw [con, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at h,
cases h; tauto },
apply mul_left_cancel' h0,
refine trans _ (classical.some_spec (exists_gcd a b)),
conv_lhs { congr, rw [← normalize_lcm a b] },
erw [← normalize.map_mul, ← classical.some_spec (exists_gcd a b), normalize_idem] },
lcm_zero_left := λ a, zero_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_lcm_left _ _),
lcm_zero_right := λ a, zero_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_lcm_right _ _),
gcd_dvd_left := λ a b, by {
split_ifs,
{ rw h, apply dvd_zero },
{ apply dvd_of_associated normalize_associated },
have h0 : lcm a b ≠ 0,
{ intro con,
have h := lcm_dvd (dvd.intro b rfl) (dvd.intro_left a rfl),
rw [con, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at h,
cases h; tauto },
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← classical.some_spec (exists_gcd a b),
normalize_dvd_iff, mul_comm, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h],
apply dvd_lcm_right },
gcd_dvd_right := λ a b, by {
split_ifs,
{ apply dvd_of_associated normalize_associated },
{ rw h_1, apply dvd_zero },
have h0 : lcm a b ≠ 0,
{ intro con,
have h := lcm_dvd (dvd.intro b rfl) (dvd.intro_left a rfl),
rw [con, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at h,
cases h; tauto },
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← classical.some_spec (exists_gcd a b),
normalize_dvd_iff, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h_1],
apply dvd_lcm_left },
dvd_gcd := λ a b c ac ab, by {
split_ifs,
{ apply dvd_normalize_iff.2 ab },
{ apply dvd_normalize_iff.2 ac },
have h0 : lcm c b ≠ 0,
{ intro con,
have h := lcm_dvd (dvd.intro b rfl) (dvd.intro_left c rfl),
rw [con, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at h,
cases h; tauto },
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← classical.some_spec (dvd_normalize_iff.2
(lcm_dvd (dvd.intro b rfl) (dvd.intro_left c rfl))), dvd_normalize_iff],
rcases ab with ⟨d, rfl⟩,
rw mul_eq_zero at h_1,
push_neg at h_1,
rw [mul_comm a, ← mul_assoc, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h_1.1],
apply lcm_dvd (dvd.intro d rfl),
rw [mul_comm, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h_1.2],
apply ac },
.. (infer_instance : normalization_monoid α) }
/-- Define a `gcd_monoid` structure on a monoid just from the existence of a `gcd`. -/
noncomputable def gcd_monoid_of_exists_gcd [decidable_eq α]
(h : ∀ a b : α, ∃ c : α, ∀ d : α, d ∣ a ∧ d ∣ b ↔ d ∣ c) :
gcd_monoid α :=
gcd_monoid_of_gcd
(λ a b, normalize (classical.some (h a b)))
(λ a b, normalize_dvd_iff.2
(((classical.some_spec (h a b) (classical.some (h a b))).2 (dvd_refl _))).1)
(λ a b, normalize_dvd_iff.2
(((classical.some_spec (h a b) (classical.some (h a b))).2 (dvd_refl _))).2)
(λ a b c ac ab, dvd_normalize_iff.2 ((classical.some_spec (h c b) a).1 ⟨ac, ab⟩))
(λ a b, normalize_idem _)
/-- Define a `gcd_monoid` structure on a monoid just from the existence of an `lcm`. -/
noncomputable def gcd_monoid_of_exists_lcm [decidable_eq α]
(h : ∀ a b : α, ∃ c : α, ∀ d : α, a ∣ d ∧ b ∣ d ↔ c ∣ d) :
gcd_monoid α :=
gcd_monoid_of_lcm
(λ a b, normalize (classical.some (h a b)))
(λ a b, dvd_normalize_iff.2
(((classical.some_spec (h a b) (classical.some (h a b))).2 (dvd_refl _))).1)
(λ a b, dvd_normalize_iff.2
(((classical.some_spec (h a b) (classical.some (h a b))).2 (dvd_refl _))).2)
(λ a b c ac ab, normalize_dvd_iff.2 ((classical.some_spec (h c b) a).1 ⟨ac, ab⟩))
(λ a b, normalize_idem _)
end constructors
|
0d26a82f9e40fc47d9ce70c45a110a287128a311 | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /src/field_theory/splitting_field.lean | 33c09232c3624680e3feeb2a6d7b991b7ebdbdc9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,795 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
Definition of splitting fields, and definition of homomorphism into any field that splits
-/
import ring_theory.unique_factorization_domain
import data.polynomial ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
algebra.euclidean_domain
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace polynomial
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
variables [discrete_field α] [discrete_field β] [discrete_field γ]
open polynomial
section splits
variables (i : α → β) [is_field_hom i]
/-- a polynomial `splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1 -/
def splits (f : polynomial α) : Prop :=
f = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : polynomial β}, irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
@[simp] lemma splits_zero : splits i (0 : polynomial α) := or.inl rfl
@[simp] lemma splits_C (a : α) : splits i (C a) :=
if ha : a = 0 then ha.symm ▸ (@C_0 α _ _).symm ▸ splits_zero i
else
have hia : i a ≠ 0, from mt ((is_add_group_hom.injective_iff i).1
(is_field_hom.injective i) _) ha,
or.inr $ λ g hg ⟨p, hp⟩, absurd hg.1 (classical.not_not.2 (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 $
by have := congr_arg degree hp;
simp [degree_C hia, @eq_comm (with_bot ℕ) 0,
nat.with_bot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this; clear _fun_match; tautology))
lemma splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : polynomial α} (hf : degree f = 1) : splits i f :=
or.inr $ λ g hg ⟨p, hp⟩,
by have := congr_arg degree hp;
simp [nat.with_bot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (with_bot ℕ) 1,
mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this;
clear _fun_match; tauto
lemma splits_of_degree_le_one {f : polynomial α} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : splits i f :=
begin
cases h : degree f with n,
{ rw [degree_eq_bot.1 h]; exact splits_zero i },
{ cases n with n,
{ rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (trans_rel_right (≤) h (le_refl _))];
exact splits_C _ _ },
{ have hn : n = 0,
{ rw h at hf,
cases n, { refl }, { exact absurd hf dec_trivial } },
exact splits_of_degree_eq_one _ (by rw [h, hn]; refl) } }
end
lemma splits_mul {f g : polynomial α} (hf : splits i f) (hg : splits i g) : splits i (f * g) :=
if h : f * g = 0 then by simp [h]
else or.inr $ λ p hp hpf, ((principal_ideal_domain.irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g, by convert hpf; rw polynomial.map_mul)).elim
(hf.resolve_left (λ hf, by simpa [hf] using h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (λ hg, by simpa [hg] using h) hp)
lemma splits_of_splits_mul {f g : polynomial α} (hfg : f * g ≠ 0) (h : splits i (f * g)) :
splits i f ∧ splits i g :=
⟨or.inr $ λ g hgi hg, or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw map_mul; exact dvd.trans hg (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
or.inr $ λ g hgi hg, or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw map_mul; exact dvd.trans hg (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
lemma splits_map_iff (j : β → γ) [is_field_hom j] {f : polynomial α} :
splits j (f.map i) ↔ splits (λ x, j (i x)) f :=
by simp [splits, polynomial.map_map]
lemma exists_root_of_splits {f : polynomial α} (hs : splits i f) (hf0 : degree f ≠ 0) :
∃ x, eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then ⟨37, by simp [hf0]⟩
else
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := is_noetherian_ring.exists_irreducible_factor
(show ¬ is_unit (f.map i), from mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 (by rwa degree_map))
(by rw [ne.def, map_eq_zero]; exact hf0) in
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (hs.resolve_left hf0 hg.1 hg.2) in
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg.2 in
⟨x, by rw [← eval_map, hi, eval_mul, show _ = _, from hx, zero_mul]⟩
lemma exists_multiset_of_splits {f : polynomial α} : splits i f →
∃ (s : multiset β), f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) *
(s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod :=
suffices splits id (f.map i) → ∃ s : multiset β, f.map i =
(C (f.map i).leading_coeff) * (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod,
by rwa [splits_map_iff, leading_coeff_map i] at this,
is_noetherian_ring.irreducible_induction_on (f.map i)
(λ _, ⟨{37}, by simp [is_ring_hom.map_zero i]⟩)
(λ u hu _, ⟨0,
by conv_lhs { rw eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu) };
simp [leading_coeff, nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu)]⟩)
(λ f p hf0 hp ih hfs,
have hpf0 : p * f ≠ 0, from mul_ne_zero (nonzero_of_irreducible hp) hf0,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := ih (splits_of_splits_mul _ hpf0 hfs).2 in
⟨-(p * norm_unit p).coeff 0 :: s,
have hp1 : degree p = 1, from hfs.resolve_left hpf0 hp (by simp),
begin
rw [multiset.map_cons, multiset.prod_cons, leading_coeff_mul, C_mul, mul_assoc,
mul_left_comm (C f.leading_coeff), ← hs, ← mul_assoc, domain.mul_right_inj hf0],
conv_lhs {rw eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hp1},
simp only [mul_add, coe_norm_unit (nonzero_of_irreducible hp), mul_comm p, coeff_neg,
C_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg, coeff_C_mul, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, C_mul.symm,
mul_inv_cancel (show p.leading_coeff ≠ 0, from mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1
(nonzero_of_irreducible hp)), one_mul],
end⟩)
section UFD
local attribute [instance, priority 0] principal_ideal_domain.to_unique_factorization_domain
local infix ` ~ᵤ ` : 50 := associated
open unique_factorization_domain associates
lemma splits_of_exists_multiset {f : polynomial α} {s : multiset β}
(hs : f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) * (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod) :
splits i f :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then or.inl hf0
else
or.inr $ λ p hp hdp,
have ht : multiset.rel associated
(factors (f.map i)) (s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)) :=
unique
(λ p hp, irreducible_factors (mt (map_eq_zero i).1 hf0) _ hp)
(λ p, by simp [@eq_comm _ _ p, -sub_eq_add_neg,
irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (degree_X_sub_C _)] {contextual := tt})
(associated.symm $ calc _ ~ᵤ f.map i :
⟨units.map C (units.mk0 (f.map i).leading_coeff
(mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 (mt (map_eq_zero i).1 hf0))),
by conv_rhs {rw [hs, ← leading_coeff_map i, mul_comm]}; refl⟩
... ~ᵤ _ : associated.symm (unique_factorization_domain.factors_prod (by simpa using hf0))),
let ⟨q, hq, hpq⟩ := exists_mem_factors_of_dvd (by simpa) hp hdp in
let ⟨q', hq', hqq'⟩ := multiset.exists_mem_of_rel_of_mem ht hq in
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := multiset.mem_map.1 hq' in
by rw [← degree_X_sub_C a, ha.2];
exact degree_eq_degree_of_associated (hpq.trans hqq')
lemma splits_of_splits_id {f : polynomial α} : splits id f → splits i f :=
unique_factorization_domain.induction_on_prime f (λ _, splits_zero _)
(λ _ hu _, splits_of_degree_le_one _
((is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hu).symm ▸ dec_trivial))
(λ a p ha0 hp ih hfi, splits_mul _
(splits_of_degree_eq_one _
((splits_of_splits_mul _ (mul_ne_zero hp.1 ha0) hfi).1.resolve_left
hp.1 (irreducible_of_prime hp) (by rw map_id)))
(ih (splits_of_splits_mul _ (mul_ne_zero hp.1 ha0) hfi).2))
end UFD
lemma splits_iff_exists_multiset {f : polynomial α} : splits i f ↔
∃ (s : multiset β), f.map i = C (i f.leading_coeff) *
(s.map (λ a : β, (X : polynomial β) - C a)).prod :=
⟨exists_multiset_of_splits i, λ ⟨s, hs⟩, splits_of_exists_multiset i hs⟩
lemma splits_comp_of_splits (j : β → γ) [is_field_hom j] {f : polynomial α}
(h : splits i f) : splits (λ x, j (i x)) f :=
begin
change i with (λ x, id (i x)) at h,
rw [← splits_map_iff],
rw [← splits_map_iff i id] at h,
exact splits_of_splits_id _ h
end
end splits
end polynomial
|
fa8770dcd382d6effc07640f388770d40b1359e8 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/topology/metric_space/gromov_hausdorff_realized.lean | 1245c6d4a86c0f9edb64abfa751a223f32a0368b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,335 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.metric_space.gluing
import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance
import topology.continuous_function.bounded
/-!
# The Gromov-Hausdorff distance is realized
In this file, we construct of a good coupling between nonempty compact metric spaces, minimizing
their Hausdorff distance. This construction is instrumental to study the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance between nonempty compact metric spaces.
Given two nonempty compact metric spaces `X` and `Y`, we define `optimal_GH_coupling X Y` as a
compact metric space, together with two isometric embeddings `optimal_GH_injl` and `optimal_GH_injr`
respectively of `X` and `Y` into `optimal_GH_coupling X Y`. The main property of the optimal
coupling is that the Hausdorff distance between `X` and `Y` in `optimal_GH_coupling X Y` is smaller
than the corresponding distance in any other coupling. We do not prove completely this fact in this
file, but we show a good enough approximation of this fact in `Hausdorff_dist_optimal_le_HD`, that
will suffice to obtain the full statement once the Gromov-Hausdorff distance is properly defined,
in `Hausdorff_dist_optimal`.
The key point in the construction is that the set of possible distances coming from isometric
embeddings of `X` and `Y` in metric spaces is a set of equicontinuous functions. By Arzela-Ascoli,
it is compact, and one can find such a distance which is minimal. This distance defines a premetric
space structure on `X ⊕ Y`. The corresponding metric quotient is `optimal_GH_coupling X Y`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space nnreal
universes u v w
open classical set function topological_space filter metric quotient
open bounded_continuous_function
open sum (inl inr)
local attribute [instance] metric_space_sum
namespace Gromov_Hausdorff
section Gromov_Hausdorff_realized
/- This section shows that the Gromov-Hausdorff distance
is realized. For this, we consider candidate distances on the disjoint union
`X ⊕ Y` of two compact nonempty metric spaces, almost realizing the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance, and show that they form a compact family by applying Arzela-Ascoli
theorem. The existence of a minimizer follows. -/
section definitions
variables (X : Type u) (Y : Type v)
[metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X]
[metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [nonempty Y]
@[reducible] private def prod_space_fun : Type* := ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y)) → ℝ
@[reducible] private def Cb : Type* := bounded_continuous_function ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y)) ℝ
private def max_var : ℝ≥0 :=
2 * ⟨diam (univ : set X), diam_nonneg⟩ + 1 + 2 * ⟨diam (univ : set Y), diam_nonneg⟩
private lemma one_le_max_var : 1 ≤ max_var X Y := calc
(1 : real) = 2 * 0 + 1 + 2 * 0 : by simp
... ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set X) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set Y) :
by apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, diam_nonneg]; norm_num
/-- The set of functions on `X ⊕ Y` that are candidates distances to realize the
minimum of the Hausdorff distances between `X` and `Y` in a coupling -/
def candidates : set (prod_space_fun X Y) :=
{f | (((((∀ x y : X, f (sum.inl x, sum.inl y) = dist x y)
∧ (∀ x y : Y, f (sum.inr x, sum.inr y) = dist x y))
∧ (∀ x y, f (x, y) = f (y, x)))
∧ (∀ x y z, f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z)))
∧ (∀ x, f (x, x) = 0))
∧ (∀ x y, f (x, y) ≤ max_var X Y) }
/-- Version of the set of candidates in bounded_continuous_functions, to apply
Arzela-Ascoli -/
private def candidates_b : set (Cb X Y) := {f : Cb X Y | (f : _ → ℝ) ∈ candidates X Y}
end definitions --section
section constructions
variables {X : Type u} {Y : Type v}
[metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X] [metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [nonempty Y]
{f : prod_space_fun X Y} {x y z t : X ⊕ Y}
local attribute [instance, priority 10] inhabited_of_nonempty'
private lemma max_var_bound : dist x y ≤ max_var X Y := calc
dist x y ≤ diam (univ : set (X ⊕ Y)) :
dist_le_diam_of_mem bounded_of_compact_space (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)
... = diam (inl '' (univ : set X) ∪ inr '' (univ : set Y)) :
by apply congr_arg; ext x y z; cases x; simp [mem_univ, mem_range_self]
... ≤ diam (inl '' (univ : set X)) + dist (inl default) (inr default) +
diam (inr '' (univ : set Y)) :
diam_union (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)) (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _))
... = diam (univ : set X) + (dist default default + 1 + dist default default) +
diam (univ : set Y) :
by { rw [isometry_inl.diam_image, isometry_inr.diam_image], refl }
... = 1 * diam (univ : set X) + 1 + 1 * diam (univ : set Y) : by simp
... ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set X) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set Y) :
begin
apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, diam_nonneg, le_refl],
norm_num, norm_num
end
private lemma candidates_symm (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, y) = f (y, x) := fA.1.1.1.2 x y
private lemma candidates_triangle (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z) :=
fA.1.1.2 x y z
private lemma candidates_refl (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, x) = 0 := fA.1.2 x
private lemma candidates_nonneg (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : 0 ≤ f (x, y) :=
begin
have : 0 ≤ 2 * f (x, y) := calc
0 = f (x, x) : (candidates_refl fA).symm
... ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, x) : candidates_triangle fA
... = f (x, y) + f (x, y) : by rw [candidates_symm fA]
... = 2 * f (x, y) : by ring,
by linarith
end
private lemma candidates_dist_inl (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) (x y: X) :
f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y :=
fA.1.1.1.1.1 x y
private lemma candidates_dist_inr (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) (x y : Y) :
f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y :=
fA.1.1.1.1.2 x y
private lemma candidates_le_max_var (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : f (x, y) ≤ max_var X Y :=
fA.2 x y
/-- candidates are bounded by `max_var X Y` -/
private lemma candidates_dist_bound (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) :
∀ {x y : X ⊕ Y}, f (x, y) ≤ max_var X Y * dist x y
| (inl x) (inl y) := calc
f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y : candidates_dist_inl fA x y
... = dist (inl x) (inl y) : by { rw @sum.dist_eq X Y, refl }
... = 1 * dist (inl x) (inl y) : by simp
... ≤ max_var X Y * dist (inl x) (inl y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (one_le_max_var X Y) dist_nonneg
| (inl x) (inr y) := calc
f (inl x, inr y) ≤ max_var X Y : candidates_le_max_var fA
... = max_var X Y * 1 : by simp
... ≤ max_var X Y * dist (inl x) (inr y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left sum.one_dist_le (le_trans (zero_le_one) (one_le_max_var X Y))
| (inr x) (inl y) := calc
f (inr x, inl y) ≤ max_var X Y : candidates_le_max_var fA
... = max_var X Y * 1 : by simp
... ≤ max_var X Y * dist (inl x) (inr y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left sum.one_dist_le (le_trans (zero_le_one) (one_le_max_var X Y))
| (inr x) (inr y) := calc
f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y : candidates_dist_inr fA x y
... = dist (inr x) (inr y) : by { rw @sum.dist_eq X Y, refl }
... = 1 * dist (inr x) (inr y) : by simp
... ≤ max_var X Y * dist (inr x) (inr y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (one_le_max_var X Y) dist_nonneg
/-- Technical lemma to prove that candidates are Lipschitz -/
private lemma candidates_lipschitz_aux (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) :
f (x, y) - f (z, t) ≤ 2 * max_var X Y * dist (x, y) (z, t) :=
calc
f (x, y) - f(z, t) ≤ f (x, t) + f (t, y) - f (z, t) : sub_le_sub_right (candidates_triangle fA) _
... ≤ (f (x, z) + f (z, t) + f(t, y)) - f (z, t) :
sub_le_sub_right (add_le_add_right (candidates_triangle fA) _ ) _
... = f (x, z) + f (t, y) : by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
... ≤ max_var X Y * dist x z + max_var X Y * dist t y :
add_le_add (candidates_dist_bound fA) (candidates_dist_bound fA)
... ≤ max_var X Y * max (dist x z) (dist t y) + max_var X Y * max (dist x z) (dist t y) :
begin
apply add_le_add,
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_left (dist x z) (dist t y))
(zero_le_one.trans (one_le_max_var X Y)),
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_right (dist x z) (dist t y))
(zero_le_one.trans (one_le_max_var X Y)),
end
... = 2 * max_var X Y * max (dist x z) (dist y t) :
by { simp [dist_comm], ring }
... = 2 * max_var X Y * dist (x, y) (z, t) : by refl
/-- Candidates are Lipschitz -/
private lemma candidates_lipschitz (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) :
lipschitz_with (2 * max_var X Y) f :=
begin
apply lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul,
rintros ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨z, t⟩,
rw [real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff],
use candidates_lipschitz_aux fA,
rw [dist_comm],
exact candidates_lipschitz_aux fA
end
/-- candidates give rise to elements of bounded_continuous_functions -/
def candidates_b_of_candidates (f : prod_space_fun X Y) (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) : Cb X Y :=
bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_compact ⟨f, (candidates_lipschitz fA).continuous⟩
lemma candidates_b_of_candidates_mem (f : prod_space_fun X Y) (fA : f ∈ candidates X Y) :
candidates_b_of_candidates f fA ∈ candidates_b X Y := fA
/-- The distance on `X ⊕ Y` is a candidate -/
private lemma dist_mem_candidates : (λp : (X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y), dist p.1 p.2) ∈ candidates X Y :=
begin
simp only [candidates, dist_comm, forall_const, and_true, add_comm, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self, sum.forall, set.mem_set_of_eq, dist_self],
repeat { split
<|> exact (λa y z, dist_triangle_left _ _ _)
<|> exact (λx y, by refl)
<|> exact (λx y, max_var_bound) }
end
/-- The distance on `X ⊕ Y` as a candidate -/
def candidates_b_dist (X : Type u) (Y : Type v) [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [inhabited X]
[metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [inhabited Y] : Cb X Y :=
candidates_b_of_candidates _ dist_mem_candidates
lemma candidates_b_dist_mem_candidates_b : candidates_b_dist X Y ∈ candidates_b X Y :=
candidates_b_of_candidates_mem _ _
private lemma candidates_b_nonempty : (candidates_b X Y).nonempty :=
⟨_, candidates_b_dist_mem_candidates_b⟩
/-- To apply Arzela-Ascoli, we need to check that the set of candidates is closed and
equicontinuous. Equicontinuity follows from the Lipschitz control, we check closedness. -/
private lemma closed_candidates_b : is_closed (candidates_b X Y) :=
begin
have I1 : ∀ x y, is_closed {f : Cb X Y | f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y} :=
λx y, is_closed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_const,
have I2 : ∀ x y, is_closed {f : Cb X Y | f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y } :=
λx y, is_closed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_const,
have I3 : ∀ x y, is_closed {f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) = f (y, x)} :=
λx y, is_closed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_eval_const,
have I4 : ∀ x y z, is_closed {f : Cb X Y | f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z)} :=
λx y z, is_closed_le continuous_eval_const (continuous_eval_const.add continuous_eval_const),
have I5 : ∀ x, is_closed {f : Cb X Y | f (x, x) = 0} :=
λx, is_closed_eq continuous_eval_const continuous_const,
have I6 : ∀ x y, is_closed {f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) ≤ max_var X Y} :=
λx y, is_closed_le continuous_eval_const continuous_const,
have : candidates_b X Y = (⋂x y, {f : Cb X Y | f ((@inl X Y x), (@inl X Y y)) = dist x y})
∩ (⋂x y, {f : Cb X Y | f ((@inr X Y x), (@inr X Y y)) = dist x y})
∩ (⋂x y, {f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) = f (y, x)})
∩ (⋂x y z, {f : Cb X Y | f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z)})
∩ (⋂x, {f : Cb X Y | f (x, x) = 0})
∩ (⋂x y, {f : Cb X Y | f (x, y) ≤ max_var X Y}),
{ ext, simp only [candidates_b, candidates, mem_inter_iff, mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq] },
rw this,
repeat { apply is_closed.inter _ _
<|> apply is_closed_Inter _
<|> apply I1 _ _
<|> apply I2 _ _
<|> apply I3 _ _
<|> apply I4 _ _ _
<|> apply I5 _
<|> apply I6 _ _
<|> assume x },
end
/-- Compactness of candidates (in bounded_continuous_functions) follows. -/
private lemma is_compact_candidates_b : is_compact (candidates_b X Y) :=
begin
refine arzela_ascoli₂ (Icc 0 (max_var X Y)) is_compact_Icc (candidates_b X Y)
closed_candidates_b _ _,
{ rintros f ⟨x1, x2⟩ hf,
simp only [set.mem_Icc],
exact ⟨candidates_nonneg hf, candidates_le_max_var hf⟩ },
{ refine equicontinuous_of_continuity_modulus (λt, 2 * max_var X Y * t) _ _ _,
{ have : tendsto (λ (t : ℝ), 2 * (max_var X Y : ℝ) * t) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 (2 * max_var X Y * 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_id,
simpa using this },
{ assume x y f hf,
exact (candidates_lipschitz hf).dist_le_mul _ _ } }
end
/-- We will then choose the candidate minimizing the Hausdorff distance. Except that we are not
in a metric space setting, so we need to define our custom version of Hausdorff distance,
called HD, and prove its basic properties. -/
def HD (f : Cb X Y) := max (⨆ x, ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y)) (⨆ y, ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y))
/- We will show that HD is continuous on bounded_continuous_functions, to deduce that its
minimum on the compact set candidates_b is attained. Since it is defined in terms of
infimum and supremum on `ℝ`, which is only conditionnally complete, we will need all the time
to check that the defining sets are bounded below or above. This is done in the next few
technical lemmas -/
lemma HD_below_aux1 {f : Cb X Y} (C : ℝ) {x : X} :
bdd_below (range (λ (y : Y), f (inl x, inr y) + C)) :=
let ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 f.bounded_range).1 in
⟨cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λi, add_le_add_right ((λx, hcf (mem_range_self x)) _) _)⟩
private lemma HD_bound_aux1 (f : Cb X Y) (C : ℝ) :
bdd_above (range (λ (x : X), ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y) + C)) :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 f.bounded_range).2 with ⟨Cf, hCf⟩,
refine ⟨Cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λx, _)⟩,
calc (⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y) + C) ≤ f (inl x, inr default) + C :
cinfi_le (HD_below_aux1 C) default
... ≤ Cf + C : add_le_add ((λx, hCf (mem_range_self x)) _) le_rfl
end
lemma HD_below_aux2 {f : Cb X Y} (C : ℝ) {y : Y} :
bdd_below (range (λ (x : X), f (inl x, inr y) + C)) :=
let ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 f.bounded_range).1 in
⟨cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λi, add_le_add_right ((λx, hcf (mem_range_self x)) _) _)⟩
private lemma HD_bound_aux2 (f : Cb X Y) (C : ℝ) :
bdd_above (range (λ (y : Y), ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y) + C)) :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 f.bounded_range).2 with ⟨Cf, hCf⟩,
refine ⟨Cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λy, _)⟩,
calc (⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y) + C) ≤ f (inl default, inr y) + C :
cinfi_le (HD_below_aux2 C) default
... ≤ Cf + C : add_le_add ((λx, hCf (mem_range_self x)) _) le_rfl
end
/-- Explicit bound on `HD (dist)`. This means that when looking for minimizers it will
be sufficient to look for functions with `HD(f)` bounded by this bound. -/
lemma HD_candidates_b_dist_le :
HD (candidates_b_dist X Y) ≤ diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y) :=
begin
refine max_le (csupr_le (λx, _)) (csupr_le (λy, _)),
{ have A : (⨅ y, candidates_b_dist X Y (inl x, inr y)) ≤
candidates_b_dist X Y (inl x, inr default) :=
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux1 0) default,
have B : dist (inl x) (inr default) ≤ diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y) := calc
dist (inl x) (inr (default : Y)) = dist x (default : X) + 1 + dist default default : rfl
... ≤ diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y) :
begin
apply add_le_add (add_le_add _ le_rfl),
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem bounded_of_compact_space (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _),
any_goals { exact ordered_add_comm_monoid.to_covariant_class_left ℝ },
any_goals { exact ordered_add_comm_monoid.to_covariant_class_right ℝ },
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem bounded_of_compact_space (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _),
end,
exact le_trans A B },
{ have A : (⨅ x, candidates_b_dist X Y (inl x, inr y)) ≤
candidates_b_dist X Y (inl default, inr y) :=
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux2 0) default,
have B : dist (inl default) (inr y) ≤ diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y) := calc
dist (inl (default : X)) (inr y) = dist default default + 1 + dist default y : rfl
... ≤ diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y) :
begin
apply add_le_add (add_le_add _ le_rfl),
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem bounded_of_compact_space (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _),
any_goals { exact ordered_add_comm_monoid.to_covariant_class_left ℝ },
any_goals { exact ordered_add_comm_monoid.to_covariant_class_right ℝ },
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem bounded_of_compact_space (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)
end,
exact le_trans A B },
end
/- To check that HD is continuous, we check that it is Lipschitz. As HD is a max, we
prove separately inequalities controlling the two terms (relying too heavily on copy-paste...) -/
private lemma HD_lipschitz_aux1 (f g : Cb X Y) :
(⨆ x, ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ (⨆ x, ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 g.bounded_range).1 with ⟨cg, hcg⟩,
have Hcg : ∀ x, cg ≤ g x := λx, hcg (mem_range_self x),
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 f.bounded_range).1 with ⟨cf, hcf⟩,
have Hcf : ∀ x, cf ≤ f x := λx, hcf (mem_range_self x),
-- prove the inequality but with `dist f g` inside, by using inequalities comparing
-- supr to supr and infi to infi
have Z : (⨆ x, ⨅ y, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ ⨆ x, ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g :=
csupr_mono (HD_bound_aux1 _ (dist f g))
(λx, cinfi_mono ⟨cf, forall_range_iff.2(λi, Hcf _)⟩ (λy, coe_le_coe_add_dist)),
-- move the `dist f g` out of the infimum and the supremum, arguing that continuous monotone maps
-- (here the addition of `dist f g`) preserve infimum and supremum
have E1 : ∀ x, (⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g,
{ assume x,
refine monotone.map_cinfi_of_continuous_at (continuous_at_id.add continuous_at_const) _ _,
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ show bdd_below (range (λ (y : Y), g (inl x, inr y))),
from ⟨cg, forall_range_iff.2(λi, Hcg _)⟩ } },
have E2 : (⨆ x, ⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨆ x, (⨅ y, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g,
{ refine monotone.map_csupr_of_continuous_at (continuous_at_id.add continuous_at_const) _ _,
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ simpa using HD_bound_aux1 _ 0 } },
-- deduce the result from the above two steps
simpa [E2, E1, function.comp]
end
private lemma HD_lipschitz_aux2 (f g : Cb X Y) :
(⨆ y, ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ (⨆ y, ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 g.bounded_range).1 with ⟨cg, hcg⟩,
have Hcg : ∀ x, cg ≤ g x := λx, hcg (mem_range_self x),
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 f.bounded_range).1 with ⟨cf, hcf⟩,
have Hcf : ∀ x, cf ≤ f x := λx, hcf (mem_range_self x),
-- prove the inequality but with `dist f g` inside, by using inequalities comparing
-- supr to supr and infi to infi
have Z : (⨆ y, ⨅ x, f (inl x, inr y)) ≤ ⨆ y, ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g :=
csupr_mono (HD_bound_aux2 _ (dist f g))
(λy, cinfi_mono ⟨cf, forall_range_iff.2(λi, Hcf _)⟩ (λy, coe_le_coe_add_dist)),
-- move the `dist f g` out of the infimum and the supremum, arguing that continuous monotone maps
-- (here the addition of `dist f g`) preserve infimum and supremum
have E1 : ∀ y, (⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g,
{ assume y,
refine monotone.map_cinfi_of_continuous_at (continuous_at_id.add continuous_at_const) _ _,
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ show bdd_below (range (λx:X, g (inl x, inr y))),
from ⟨cg, forall_range_iff.2 (λi, Hcg _)⟩ } },
have E2 : (⨆ y, ⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g = ⨆ y, (⨅ x, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g,
{ refine monotone.map_csupr_of_continuous_at (continuous_at_id.add continuous_at_const) _ _,
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ simpa using HD_bound_aux2 _ 0 } },
-- deduce the result from the above two steps
simpa [E2, E1]
end
private lemma HD_lipschitz_aux3 (f g : Cb X Y) : HD f ≤ HD g + dist f g :=
max_le (le_trans (HD_lipschitz_aux1 f g) (add_le_add_right (le_max_left _ _) _))
(le_trans (HD_lipschitz_aux2 f g) (add_le_add_right (le_max_right _ _) _))
/-- Conclude that HD, being Lipschitz, is continuous -/
private lemma HD_continuous : continuous (HD : Cb X Y → ℝ) :=
lipschitz_with.continuous (lipschitz_with.of_le_add HD_lipschitz_aux3)
end constructions --section
section consequences
variables (X : Type u) (Y : Type v) [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X] [metric_space Y]
[compact_space Y] [nonempty Y]
/- Now that we have proved that the set of candidates is compact, and that HD is continuous,
we can finally select a candidate minimizing HD. This will be the candidate realizing the
optimal coupling. -/
private lemma exists_minimizer : ∃ f ∈ candidates_b X Y, ∀ g ∈ candidates_b X Y, HD f ≤ HD g :=
is_compact_candidates_b.exists_forall_le candidates_b_nonempty HD_continuous.continuous_on
private definition optimal_GH_dist : Cb X Y := classical.some (exists_minimizer X Y)
private lemma optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b : optimal_GH_dist X Y ∈ candidates_b X Y :=
by cases (classical.some_spec (exists_minimizer X Y)); assumption
private lemma HD_optimal_GH_dist_le (g : Cb X Y) (hg : g ∈ candidates_b X Y) :
HD (optimal_GH_dist X Y) ≤ HD g :=
let ⟨Z1, Z2⟩ := classical.some_spec (exists_minimizer X Y) in Z2 g hg
/-- With the optimal candidate, construct a premetric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, on which the
predistance is given by the candidate. Then, we will identify points at `0` predistance
to obtain a genuine metric space -/
def premetric_optimal_GH_dist : pseudo_metric_space (X ⊕ Y) :=
{ dist := λp q, optimal_GH_dist X Y (p, q),
dist_self := λx, candidates_refl (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b X Y),
dist_comm := λx y, candidates_symm (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b X Y),
dist_triangle := λx y z, candidates_triangle (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b X Y) }
local attribute [instance] premetric_optimal_GH_dist pseudo_metric.dist_setoid
/-- A metric space which realizes the optimal coupling between `X` and `Y` -/
@[derive metric_space, nolint has_nonempty_instance]
definition optimal_GH_coupling : Type* :=
pseudo_metric_quot (X ⊕ Y)
/-- Injection of `X` in the optimal coupling between `X` and `Y` -/
def optimal_GH_injl (x : X) : optimal_GH_coupling X Y := ⟦inl x⟧
/-- The injection of `X` in the optimal coupling between `X` and `Y` is an isometry. -/
lemma isometry_optimal_GH_injl : isometry (optimal_GH_injl X Y) :=
begin
refine isometry.of_dist_eq (λx y, _),
change dist ⟦inl x⟧ ⟦inl y⟧ = dist x y,
exact candidates_dist_inl (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b X Y) _ _,
end
/-- Injection of `Y` in the optimal coupling between `X` and `Y` -/
def optimal_GH_injr (y : Y) : optimal_GH_coupling X Y := ⟦inr y⟧
/-- The injection of `Y` in the optimal coupling between `X` and `Y` is an isometry. -/
lemma isometry_optimal_GH_injr : isometry (optimal_GH_injr X Y) :=
begin
refine isometry.of_dist_eq (λx y, _),
change dist ⟦inr x⟧ ⟦inr y⟧ = dist x y,
exact candidates_dist_inr (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b X Y) _ _,
end
/-- The optimal coupling between two compact spaces `X` and `Y` is still a compact space -/
instance compact_space_optimal_GH_coupling : compact_space (optimal_GH_coupling X Y) :=
⟨begin
have : (univ : set (optimal_GH_coupling X Y)) =
(optimal_GH_injl X Y '' univ) ∪ (optimal_GH_injr X Y '' univ),
{ refine subset.antisymm (λxc hxc, _) (subset_univ _),
rcases quotient.exists_rep xc with ⟨x, hx⟩,
cases x; rw ← hx,
{ have : ⟦inl x⟧ = optimal_GH_injl X Y x := rfl,
rw this,
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)) },
{ have : ⟦inr x⟧ = optimal_GH_injr X Y x := rfl,
rw this,
exact mem_union_right _ (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)) } },
rw this,
exact (is_compact_univ.image (isometry_optimal_GH_injl X Y).continuous).union
(is_compact_univ.image (isometry_optimal_GH_injr X Y).continuous)
end⟩
/-- For any candidate `f`, `HD(f)` is larger than or equal to the Hausdorff distance in the
optimal coupling. This follows from the fact that HD of the optimal candidate is exactly
the Hausdorff distance in the optimal coupling, although we only prove here the inequality
we need. -/
lemma Hausdorff_dist_optimal_le_HD {f} (h : f ∈ candidates_b X Y) :
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)) (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y)) ≤ HD f :=
begin
refine le_trans (le_of_forall_le_of_dense (λr hr, _)) (HD_optimal_GH_dist_le X Y f h),
have A : ∀ x ∈ range (optimal_GH_injl X Y), ∃ y ∈ range (optimal_GH_injr X Y), dist x y ≤ r,
{ assume x hx,
rcases mem_range.1 hx with ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw ← hz,
have I1 : (⨆ x, ⨅ y, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl x, inr y)) < r :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hr,
have I2 : (⨅ y, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl z, inr y)) ≤
⨆ x, ⨅ y, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl x, inr y) :=
le_cSup (by simpa using HD_bound_aux1 _ 0) (mem_range_self _),
have I : (⨅ y, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl z, inr y)) < r := lt_of_le_of_lt I2 I1,
rcases exists_lt_of_cInf_lt (range_nonempty _) I with ⟨r', r'range, hr'⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 r'range with ⟨z', hz'⟩,
existsi [optimal_GH_injr X Y z', mem_range_self _],
have : (optimal_GH_dist X Y) (inl z, inr z') ≤ r, by { rw hz', exact le_of_lt hr' },
exact this },
refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist _ A _,
{ rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty X with ⟨xX, _⟩,
have : optimal_GH_injl X Y xX ∈ range (optimal_GH_injl X Y) := mem_range_self _,
rcases A _ this with ⟨y, yrange, hy⟩,
exact le_trans dist_nonneg hy },
{ assume y hy,
rcases mem_range.1 hy with ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw ← hz,
have I1 : (⨆ y, ⨅ x, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl x, inr y)) < r :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right _ _) hr,
have I2 : (⨅ x, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl x, inr z)) ≤
⨆ y, ⨅ x, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl x, inr y) :=
le_cSup (by simpa using HD_bound_aux2 _ 0) (mem_range_self _),
have I : (⨅ x, optimal_GH_dist X Y (inl x, inr z)) < r := lt_of_le_of_lt I2 I1,
rcases exists_lt_of_cInf_lt (range_nonempty _) I with ⟨r', r'range, hr'⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 r'range with ⟨z', hz'⟩,
existsi [optimal_GH_injl X Y z', mem_range_self _],
have : (optimal_GH_dist X Y) (inl z', inr z) ≤ r, by { rw hz', exact le_of_lt hr' },
rw dist_comm,
exact this }
end
end consequences
/- We are done with the construction of the optimal coupling -/
end Gromov_Hausdorff_realized
end Gromov_Hausdorff
|
644f7c39670503afeba6c4d1cafaaa2ac5cb7332 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/logic/function/iterate.lean | d07e04274f4c6e102c1358a962933381992edf9d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,427 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import logic.function.conjugate
/-!
# Iterations of a function
In this file we prove simple properties of `nat.iterate f n` a.k.a. `f^[n]`:
* `iterate_zero`, `iterate_succ`, `iterate_succ'`, `iterate_add`, `iterate_mul`:
formulas for `f^[0]`, `f^[n+1]` (two versions), `f^[n+m]`, and `f^[n*m]`;
* `iterate_id` : `id^[n]=id`;
* `injective.iterate`, `surjective.iterate`, `bijective.iterate` :
iterates of an injective/surjective/bijective function belong to the same class;
* `left_inverse.iterate`, `right_inverse.iterate`, `commute.iterate_left`, `commute.iterate_right`,
`commute.iterate_iterate`:
some properties of pairs of functions survive under iterations
* `iterate_fixed`, `semiconj.iterate_*`, `semiconj₂.iterate`:
if `f` fixes a point (resp., semiconjugates unary/binary operarations), then so does `f^[n]`.
-/
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace function
variable (f : α → α)
@[simp] theorem iterate_zero : f^[0] = id := rfl
theorem iterate_zero_apply (x : α) : f^[0] x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem iterate_succ (n : ℕ) : f^[n.succ] = (f^[n]) ∘ f := rfl
theorem iterate_succ_apply (n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[n.succ] x = (f^[n]) (f x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem iterate_id (n : ℕ) : (id : α → α)^[n] = id :=
nat.rec_on n rfl $ λ n ihn, by rw [iterate_succ, ihn, comp.left_id]
theorem iterate_add : ∀ (m n : ℕ), f^[m + n] = (f^[m]) ∘ (f^[n])
| m 0 := rfl
| m (nat.succ n) := by rw [nat.add_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_add]
theorem iterate_add_apply (m n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[m + n] x = (f^[m] (f^[n] x)) :=
by rw iterate_add
@[simp] theorem iterate_one : f^[1] = f := funext $ λ a, rfl
lemma iterate_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, f^[m * n] = (f^[m]^[n])
| 0 := by simp only [nat.mul_zero, iterate_zero]
| (n + 1) := by simp only [nat.mul_succ, nat.mul_one, iterate_one, iterate_add, iterate_mul n]
variable {f}
theorem iterate_fixed {x} (h : f x = x) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] x = x :=
nat.rec_on n rfl $ λ n ihn, by rw [iterate_succ_apply, h, ihn]
theorem injective.iterate (Hinj : injective f) (n : ℕ) : injective (f^[n]) :=
nat.rec_on n injective_id $ λ n ihn, ihn.comp Hinj
theorem surjective.iterate (Hsurj : surjective f) (n : ℕ) : surjective (f^[n]) :=
nat.rec_on n surjective_id $ λ n ihn, ihn.comp Hsurj
theorem bijective.iterate (Hbij : bijective f) (n : ℕ) : bijective (f^[n]) :=
⟨Hbij.1.iterate n, Hbij.2.iterate n⟩
namespace semiconj
lemma iterate_right {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β} (h : semiconj f ga gb) (n : ℕ) :
semiconj f (ga^[n]) (gb^[n]) :=
nat.rec_on n id_right $ λ n ihn, ihn.comp_right h
lemma iterate_left {g : ℕ → α → α} (H : ∀ n, semiconj f (g n) (g $ n + 1)) (n k : ℕ) :
semiconj (f^[n]) (g k) (g $ n + k) :=
begin
induction n with n ihn generalizing k,
{ rw [nat.zero_add], exact id_left },
{ rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.add_right_comm, nat.add_assoc],
exact (H k).comp_left (ihn (k + 1)) }
end
end semiconj
namespace commute
variable {g : α → α}
lemma iterate_right (h : commute f g) (n : ℕ) : commute f (g^[n]) := h.iterate_right n
lemma iterate_left (h : commute f g) (n : ℕ) : commute (f^[n]) g := (h.symm.iterate_right n).symm
lemma iterate_iterate (h : commute f g) (m n : ℕ) : commute (f^[m]) (g^[n]) :=
(h.iterate_left m).iterate_right n
lemma iterate_eq_of_map_eq (h : commute f g) (n : ℕ) {x} (hx : f x = g x) : f^[n] x = (g^[n]) x :=
nat.rec_on n rfl $ λ n ihn,
by simp only [iterate_succ_apply, hx, (h.iterate_left n).eq, ihn, ((refl g).iterate_right n).eq]
lemma comp_iterate (h : commute f g) (n : ℕ) : (f ∘ g)^[n] = (f^[n]) ∘ (g^[n]) :=
begin
induction n with n ihn, { refl },
funext x,
simp only [ihn, (h.iterate_right n).eq, iterate_succ, comp_app]
end
variable (f)
lemma iterate_self (n : ℕ) : commute (f^[n]) f := (refl f).iterate_left n
lemma self_iterate (n : ℕ) : commute f (f^[n]) := (refl f).iterate_right n
lemma iterate_iterate_self (m n : ℕ) : commute (f^[m]) (f^[n]) := (refl f).iterate_iterate m n
end commute
lemma semiconj₂.iterate {f : α → α} {op : α → α → α} (hf : semiconj₂ f op op) (n : ℕ) :
semiconj₂ (f^[n]) op op :=
nat.rec_on n (semiconj₂.id_left op) (λ n ihn, ihn.comp hf)
variable (f)
theorem iterate_succ' (n : ℕ) : f^[n.succ] = f ∘ (f^[n]) :=
by rw [iterate_succ, (commute.self_iterate f n).comp_eq]
theorem iterate_succ_apply' (n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[n.succ] x = f (f^[n] x) :=
by rw [iterate_succ']
theorem iterate_pred_comp_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : f^[n.pred] ∘ f = (f^[n]) :=
by rw [← iterate_succ, nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hn]
theorem comp_iterate_pred_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : f ∘ (f^[n.pred]) = (f^[n]) :=
by rw [← iterate_succ', nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hn]
/-- A recursor for the iterate of a function. -/
def iterate.rec (p : α → Sort*) {f : α → α} (h : ∀ a, p a → p (f a)) {a : α} (ha : p a) (n : ℕ) :
p (f^[n] a) :=
nat.rec ha (λ m, by { rw iterate_succ', exact h _ }) n
lemma iterate.rec_zero (p : α → Sort*) {f : α → α} (h : ∀ a, p a → p (f a)) {a : α} (ha : p a) :
iterate.rec p h ha 0 = ha :=
rfl
variable {f}
theorem left_inverse.iterate {g : α → α} (hg : left_inverse g f) (n : ℕ) :
left_inverse (g^[n]) (f^[n]) :=
nat.rec_on n (λ _, rfl) $ λ n ihn, by { rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ], exact ihn.comp hg }
theorem right_inverse.iterate {g : α → α} (hg : right_inverse g f) (n : ℕ) :
right_inverse (g^[n]) (f^[n]) :=
hg.iterate n
lemma iterate_comm (f : α → α) (m n : ℕ) : f^[n]^[m] = (f^[m]^[n]) :=
(iterate_mul _ _ _).symm.trans (eq.trans (by rw nat.mul_comm) (iterate_mul _ _ _))
lemma iterate_commute (m n : ℕ) : commute (λ f : α → α, f^[m]) (λ f, f^[n]) :=
λ f, iterate_comm f m n
end function
namespace list
open function
theorem foldl_const (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) : l.foldl (λ b _, f b) a = (f^[l.length]) a :=
begin
induction l with b l H generalizing a,
{ refl },
{ rw [length_cons, foldl, iterate_succ_apply, H] }
end
theorem foldr_const (f : β → β) (b : β) : Π l : list α, l.foldr (λ _, f) b = (f^[l.length]) b
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [length_cons, foldr, foldr_const l, iterate_succ_apply']
end list
|
534f48d115894ca06ebace83e5546ec6582b87a2 | 491068d2ad28831e7dade8d6dff871c3e49d9431 | /tests/lean/mismatch.lean | eaa1bfd94e270b40f7cebc08ac1dc0ff6ffdb53a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | davidmueller13/lean | 65a3ed141b4088cd0a268e4de80eb6778b21a0e9 | c626e2e3c6f3771e07c32e82ee5b9e030de5b050 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,278,313,401 | 1,444,021,177,000 | 1,444,021,177,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 55 | lean | definition id {A : Type} {a : A} := a
check @id nat 1
|
ac9186f1ea3390063689893925d8c67f2007d648 | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /tests/lean/run/quote_bas.lean | 9c42f2764f10be0f86d930256dbe40697efa615d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,506 | lean | universes u v w
namespace quote_bas
inductive Expr (V : Type u)
| One {} : Expr
| Var (v : V) : Expr
| Mult (a b : Expr) : Expr
@[reducible] def Value := nat
def Env (V : Type u) := V → Value
open Expr
def evalExpr {V} (vs : Env V) : Expr V → Value
| One := 1
| (Var v) := vs v
| (Mult a b) := evalExpr a * evalExpr b
def novars : Env empty :=
empty.rec _
def singlevar (x : Value) : Env unit :=
λ _, x
open sum
def merge {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (a : Env A) (b : Env B) : Env (sum A B)
| (inl j) := a j
| (inr j) := b j
def map_var {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : Expr A → Expr B
| One := One
| (Var v) := Var (f v)
| (Mult a b) := Mult (map_var a) (map_var b)
def sum_assoc {A : Type u} {B : Type v} {C : Type w} : sum (sum A B) C → sum A (sum B C)
| (inl (inl a)) := inl a
| (inl (inr b)) := inr (inl b)
| (inr c) := inr (inr c)
attribute [simp] evalExpr map_var sum_assoc merge
@[simp] lemma eval_map_var_shift {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (v : Env A) (v' : Env B) (e : Expr A) : evalExpr (merge v v') (map_var inl e) = evalExpr v e :=
begin
induction e,
reflexivity,
reflexivity,
simp_using_hs
end
@[simp] lemma eval_map_var_sum_assoc {A : Type u} {B : Type v} {C : Type w} (v : Env A) (v' : Env B) (v'' : Env C) (e : Expr (sum (sum A B) C)) :
evalExpr (merge v (merge v' v'')) (map_var sum_assoc e) = evalExpr (merge (merge v v') v'') e :=
begin
induction e,
reflexivity,
{ cases v_1 with v₁, cases v₁, all_goals {simp} },
{ simp_using_hs }
end
class Quote {V : inout Type u} (l : inout Env V) (n : Value) {V' : inout Type v} (r : inout Env V') :=
(quote : Expr (sum V V'))
(eval_quote : evalExpr (merge l r) quote = n)
def quote {V : Type u} {l : Env V} (n : nat) {V' : Type v} {r : Env V'} [Quote l n r] : Expr (sum V V') :=
Quote.quote l n r
@[simp] lemma eval_quote {V : Type u} {l : Env V} (n : nat) {V' : Type v} {r : Env V'} [Quote l n r] : evalExpr (merge l r) (quote n) = n :=
Quote.eval_quote l n r
instance quote_one V (v : Env V) : Quote v 1 novars :=
{ quote := One,
eval_quote := rfl }
instance quote_mul {V : Type u} (v : Env V) n {V' : Type v} (v' : Env V') m {V'' : Type w} (v'' : Env V'')
[Quote v n v'] [Quote (merge v v') m v''] :
Quote v (n * m) (merge v' v'') :=
{ quote := Mult (map_var sum_assoc (map_var inl (quote n))) (map_var sum_assoc (quote m)),
eval_quote := by simp }
end quote_bas
|
a8a17f54e97b04c3b8d42b623cc5727d6663bf13 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/data/polynomial/algebra_map.lean | 58a367498c46d594b26ae4fd085cb1894116f976 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,507 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.eval
import algebra.algebra.tower
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We show that `polynomial A` is an R-algebra when `A` is an R-algebra.
We promote `eval₂` to an algebra hom in `aeval`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open finset
open_locale big_operators
namespace polynomial
universes u v w z
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] {p q r : polynomial R}
variables [semiring A] [algebra R A]
/-- Note that this instance also provides `algebra R (polynomial R)`. -/
instance algebra_of_algebra : algebra R (polynomial A) :=
{ smul_def' := λ r p, begin
rcases p,
simp only [C, monomial, monomial_fun, ring_hom.coe_mk, ring_hom.to_fun_eq_coe,
function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, smul_to_finsupp, mul_to_finsupp],
exact algebra.smul_def' _ _,
end,
commutes' := λ r p, begin
rcases p,
simp only [C, monomial, monomial_fun, ring_hom.coe_mk, ring_hom.to_fun_eq_coe,
function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, mul_to_finsupp],
convert algebra.commutes' r p,
end,
.. C.comp (algebra_map R A) }
lemma algebra_map_apply (r : R) :
algebra_map R (polynomial A) r = C (algebra_map R A r) :=
rfl
/--
When we have `[comm_ring R]`, the function `C` is the same as `algebra_map R (polynomial R)`.
(But note that `C` is defined when `R` is not necessarily commutative, in which case
`algebra_map` is not available.)
-/
lemma C_eq_algebra_map {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (r : R) :
C r = algebra_map R (polynomial R) r :=
rfl
instance [nontrivial A] : nontrivial (subalgebra R (polynomial A)) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, begin
rw [ne.def, set_like.ext_iff, not_forall],
refine ⟨X, _⟩,
simp only [algebra.mem_bot, not_exists, set.mem_range, iff_true, algebra.mem_top,
algebra_map_apply, not_forall],
intro x,
rw [ext_iff, not_forall],
refine ⟨1, _⟩,
simp [coeff_C],
end⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma alg_hom_eval₂_algebra_map
{R A B : Type*} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [ring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
(p : polynomial R) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (a : A) :
f (eval₂ (algebra_map R A) a p) = eval₂ (algebra_map R B) (f a) p :=
begin
dsimp [eval₂, sum],
simp only [f.map_sum, f.map_mul, f.map_pow, ring_hom.eq_int_cast, ring_hom.map_int_cast,
alg_hom.commutes],
end
@[simp]
lemma eval₂_algebra_map_X {R A : Type*} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A]
(p : polynomial R) (f : polynomial R →ₐ[R] A) :
eval₂ (algebra_map R A) (f X) p = f p :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [←polynomial.sum_C_mul_X_eq p], },
dsimp [eval₂, sum],
simp only [f.map_sum, f.map_mul, f.map_pow, ring_hom.eq_int_cast, ring_hom.map_int_cast],
simp [polynomial.C_eq_algebra_map],
end
@[simp]
lemma ring_hom_eval₂_algebra_map_int {R S : Type*} [ring R] [ring S]
(p : polynomial ℤ) (f : R →+* S) (r : R) :
f (eval₂ (algebra_map ℤ R) r p) = eval₂ (algebra_map ℤ S) (f r) p :=
alg_hom_eval₂_algebra_map p f.to_int_alg_hom r
@[simp]
lemma eval₂_algebra_map_int_X {R : Type*} [ring R] (p : polynomial ℤ) (f : polynomial ℤ →+* R) :
eval₂ (algebra_map ℤ R) (f X) p = f p :=
-- Unfortunately `f.to_int_alg_hom` doesn't work here, as typeclasses don't match up correctly.
eval₂_algebra_map_X p { commutes' := λ n, by simp, .. f }
end comm_semiring
section aeval
variables [comm_semiring R] {p q : polynomial R}
variables [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {B : Type*} [semiring B] [algebra R B]
variables (x : A)
/-- Given a valuation `x` of the variable in an `R`-algebra `A`, `aeval R A x` is
the unique `R`-algebra homomorphism from `R[X]` to `A` sending `X` to `x`. -/
def aeval : polynomial R →ₐ[R] A :=
{ commutes' := λ r, eval₂_C _ _,
..eval₂_ring_hom' (algebra_map R A) x (λ a, algebra.commutes _ _) }
variables {R A}
@[ext] lemma alg_hom_ext {f g : polynomial R →ₐ[R] A} (h : f X = g X) : f = g :=
begin
ext p,
rw [← sum_monomial_eq p],
simp [sum, f.map_sum, g.map_sum, monomial_eq_smul_X, h],
end
theorem aeval_def (p : polynomial R) : aeval x p = eval₂ (algebra_map R A) x p := rfl
@[simp] lemma aeval_zero : aeval x (0 : polynomial R) = 0 :=
alg_hom.map_zero (aeval x)
@[simp] lemma aeval_X : aeval x (X : polynomial R) = x := eval₂_X _ x
@[simp] lemma aeval_C (r : R) : aeval x (C r) = algebra_map R A r := eval₂_C _ x
@[simp] lemma aeval_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : aeval x (monomial n r) = (algebra_map _ _ r) * x^n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
@[simp] lemma aeval_X_pow {n : ℕ} : aeval x ((X : polynomial R)^n) = x^n :=
eval₂_X_pow _ _
@[simp] lemma aeval_add : aeval x (p + q) = aeval x p + aeval x q :=
alg_hom.map_add _ _ _
@[simp] lemma aeval_one : aeval x (1 : polynomial R) = 1 :=
alg_hom.map_one _
@[simp] lemma aeval_bit0 : aeval x (bit0 p) = bit0 (aeval x p) :=
alg_hom.map_bit0 _ _
@[simp] lemma aeval_bit1 : aeval x (bit1 p) = bit1 (aeval x p) :=
alg_hom.map_bit1 _ _
@[simp] lemma aeval_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : aeval x (n : polynomial R) = n :=
alg_hom.map_nat_cast _ _
lemma aeval_mul : aeval x (p * q) = aeval x p * aeval x q :=
alg_hom.map_mul _ _ _
lemma aeval_comp {A : Type*} [comm_semiring A] [algebra R A] (x : A) :
aeval x (p.comp q) = (aeval (aeval x q) p) :=
eval₂_comp (algebra_map R A)
@[simp] lemma aeval_map {A : Type*} [comm_semiring A] [algebra R A] [algebra A B]
[is_scalar_tower R A B] (b : B) (p : polynomial R) :
aeval b (p.map (algebra_map R A)) = aeval b p :=
by rw [aeval_def, eval₂_map, ←is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq, ←aeval_def]
theorem eval_unique (φ : polynomial R →ₐ[R] A) (p) :
φ p = eval₂ (algebra_map R A) (φ X) p :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on p,
{ intro r, rw eval₂_C, exact φ.commutes r },
{ intros f g ih1 ih2,
rw [φ.map_add, ih1, ih2, eval₂_add] },
{ intros n r ih,
rw [pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, φ.map_mul,
eval₂_mul_noncomm (algebra_map R A) _ (λ k, algebra.commutes _ _), eval₂_X, ih] }
end
theorem aeval_alg_hom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (x : A) : aeval (f x) = f.comp (aeval x) :=
alg_hom.ext $ λ p, by rw [eval_unique (f.comp (aeval x)), alg_hom.comp_apply, aeval_X, aeval_def]
theorem aeval_alg_hom_apply (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (x : A) (p : polynomial R) :
aeval (f x) p = f (aeval x p) :=
alg_hom.ext_iff.1 (aeval_alg_hom f x) p
lemma aeval_algebra_map_apply (x : R) (p : polynomial R) :
aeval (algebra_map R A x) p = algebra_map R A (p.eval x) :=
aeval_alg_hom_apply (algebra.of_id R A) x p
@[simp] lemma coe_aeval_eq_eval (r : R) :
(aeval r : polynomial R → R) = eval r := rfl
@[simp] lemma aeval_fn_apply {X : Type*} (g : polynomial R) (f : X → R) (x : X) :
((aeval f) g) x = aeval (f x) g :=
(aeval_alg_hom_apply (pi.eval_alg_hom _ _ x) f g).symm
@[norm_cast] lemma aeval_subalgebra_coe
(g : polynomial R) {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] (s : subalgebra R A) (f : s) :
(aeval f g : A) = aeval (f : A) g :=
(aeval_alg_hom_apply s.val f g).symm
lemma coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero (p : polynomial R) : p.coeff 0 = aeval 0 p :=
by simp [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero]
variables [comm_ring S] {f : R →+* S}
lemma is_root_of_eval₂_map_eq_zero
(hf : function.injective f) {r : R} : eval₂ f (f r) p = 0 → p.is_root r :=
begin
intro h,
apply hf,
rw [←eval₂_hom, h, f.map_zero],
end
lemma is_root_of_aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero [algebra R S] {p : polynomial R}
(inj : function.injective (algebra_map R S))
{r : R} (hr : aeval (algebra_map R S r) p = 0) : p.is_root r :=
is_root_of_eval₂_map_eq_zero inj hr
lemma dvd_term_of_dvd_eval_of_dvd_terms {z p : S} {f : polynomial S} (i : ℕ)
(dvd_eval : p ∣ f.eval z) (dvd_terms : ∀ (j ≠ i), p ∣ f.coeff j * z ^ j) :
p ∣ f.coeff i * z ^ i :=
begin
by_cases hf : f = 0,
{ simp [hf] },
by_cases hi : i ∈ f.support,
{ rw [eval, eval₂, sum] at dvd_eval,
rw [←finset.insert_erase hi, finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_erase _ _)] at dvd_eval,
refine (dvd_add_left _).mp dvd_eval,
apply finset.dvd_sum,
intros j hj,
exact dvd_terms j (finset.ne_of_mem_erase hj) },
{ convert dvd_zero p,
rw not_mem_support_iff at hi,
simp [hi] }
end
lemma dvd_term_of_is_root_of_dvd_terms {r p : S} {f : polynomial S} (i : ℕ)
(hr : f.is_root r) (h : ∀ (j ≠ i), p ∣ f.coeff j * r ^ j) : p ∣ f.coeff i * r ^ i :=
dvd_term_of_dvd_eval_of_dvd_terms i (eq.symm hr ▸ dvd_zero p) h
lemma aeval_eq_sum_range [algebra R S] {p : polynomial R} (x : S) :
aeval x p = ∑ i in finset.range (p.nat_degree + 1), p.coeff i • x ^ i :=
by { simp_rw algebra.smul_def, exact eval₂_eq_sum_range (algebra_map R S) x }
lemma aeval_eq_sum_range' [algebra R S] {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.nat_degree < n) (x : S) :
aeval x p = ∑ i in finset.range n, p.coeff i • x ^ i :=
by { simp_rw algebra.smul_def, exact eval₂_eq_sum_range' (algebra_map R S) hn x }
end aeval
section ring
variables [ring R]
/--
The evaluation map is not generally multiplicative when the coefficient ring is noncommutative,
but nevertheless any polynomial of the form `p * (X - monomial 0 r)` is sent to zero
when evaluated at `r`.
This is the key step in our proof of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem.
-/
lemma eval_mul_X_sub_C {p : polynomial R} (r : R) :
(p * (X - C r)).eval r = 0 :=
begin
simp only [eval, eval₂, ring_hom.id_apply],
have bound := calc
(p * (X - C r)).nat_degree
≤ p.nat_degree + (X - C r).nat_degree : nat_degree_mul_le
... ≤ p.nat_degree + 1 : add_le_add_left nat_degree_X_sub_C_le _
... < p.nat_degree + 2 : lt_add_one _,
rw sum_over_range' _ _ (p.nat_degree + 2) bound,
swap,
{ simp, },
rw sum_range_succ',
conv_lhs {
congr, apply_congr, skip,
rw [coeff_mul_X_sub_C, sub_mul, mul_assoc, ←pow_succ],
},
simp [sum_range_sub', coeff_monomial],
end
theorem not_is_unit_X_sub_C [nontrivial R] {r : R} : ¬ is_unit (X - C r) :=
λ ⟨⟨_, g, hfg, hgf⟩, rfl⟩, @zero_ne_one R _ _ $ by erw [← eval_mul_X_sub_C, hgf, eval_one]
end ring
lemma aeval_endomorphism {M : Type*}
[comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v : M) (p : polynomial R) :
aeval f p v = p.sum (λ n b, b • (f ^ n) v) :=
begin
rw [aeval_def, eval₂],
exact (finset.sum_hom p.support (λ h : M →ₗ[R] M, h v)).symm
end
end polynomial
|
20970ae6ac82d24a3154ba182a680ec9d4ac1741 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/caching_user_attribute.lean | b5459dc53bcf24790ece326c925dc68e73b88109 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 648 | lean | @[user_attribute]
meta def foo_attr : user_attribute string :=
{ name := `foo, descr := "bar",
cache_cfg := {
mk_cache := λ ns, return $ string.join (list.map (λ n, to_string n ++ "\n") ns),
dependencies := []} }
attribute [foo] eq.refl eq.mp
set_option trace.user_attributes_cache true
run_cmd do
s : string ← foo_attr.get_cache,
tactic.trace s,
s : string ← foo_attr.get_cache,
tactic.trace s,
foo_attr.set `eq.mpr () tt,
s : string ← foo_attr.get_cache,
tactic.trace s,
tactic.set_basic_attribute `reducible ``eq.mp, -- should not affect [foo] cache
s : string ← foo_attr.get_cache,
tactic.trace s
|
fc95e9024ed9a7b4f860533d838df001b52aeeca | 737dc4b96c97368cb66b925eeea3ab633ec3d702 | /src/Lean/Elab/Do.lean | 28196eb1d14cbeb3fd033ffede32db521d452345 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Bioye97/lean4 | 1ace34638efd9913dc5991443777b01a08983289 | bc3900cbb9adda83eed7e6affeaade7cfd07716d | refs/heads/master | 1,690,589,820,211 | 1,631,051,000,000 | 1,631,067,598,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 70,313 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.BindersUtil
import Lean.Elab.PatternVar
import Lean.Elab.Quotation.Util
import Lean.Parser.Do
-- HACK: avoid code explosion until heuristics are improved
set_option compiler.reuse false
namespace Lean.Elab.Term
open Lean.Parser.Term
open Meta
private def getDoSeqElems (doSeq : Syntax) : List Syntax :=
if doSeq.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doSeqBracketed then
doSeq[1].getArgs.toList.map fun arg => arg[0]
else if doSeq.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doSeqIndent then
doSeq[0].getArgs.toList.map fun arg => arg[0]
else
[]
private def getDoSeq (doStx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
doStx[1]
@[builtinTermElab liftMethod] def elabLiftMethod : TermElab := fun stx _ =>
throwErrorAt stx "invalid use of `(<- ...)`, must be nested inside a 'do' expression"
/-- Return true if we should not lift `(<- ...)` actions nested in the syntax nodes with the given kind. -/
private def liftMethodDelimiter (k : SyntaxNodeKind) : Bool :=
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.do ||
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doSeqIndent ||
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doSeqBracketed ||
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.termReturn ||
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.termUnless ||
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.termTry ||
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.termFor
/-- Given `stx` which is a `letPatDecl`, `letEqnsDecl`, or `letIdDecl`, return true if it has binders. -/
private def letDeclArgHasBinders (letDeclArg : Syntax) : Bool :=
let k := letDeclArg.getKind
if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letPatDecl then
false
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letEqnsDecl then
true
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letIdDecl then
-- letIdLhs := ident >> checkWsBefore "expected space before binders" >> many (ppSpace >> (simpleBinderWithoutType <|> bracketedBinder)) >> optType
let binders := letDeclArg[1]
binders.getNumArgs > 0
else
false
/-- Return `true` if the given `letDecl` contains binders. -/
private def letDeclHasBinders (letDecl : Syntax) : Bool :=
letDeclArgHasBinders letDecl[0]
/-- Return true if we should generate an error message when lifting a method over this kind of syntax. -/
private def liftMethodForbiddenBinder (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
let k := stx.getKind
if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.fun || k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.matchAlts ||
k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetRec || k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letrec then
-- It is never ok to lift over this kind of binder
true
-- The following kinds of `let`-expressions require extra checks to decide whether they contain binders or not
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.let then
letDeclHasBinders stx[1]
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLet then
letDeclHasBinders stx[2]
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetArrow then
letDeclArgHasBinders stx[2]
else
false
private partial def hasLiftMethod : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node k args =>
if liftMethodDelimiter k then false
-- NOTE: We don't check for lifts in quotations here, which doesn't break anything but merely makes this rare case a
-- bit slower
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.liftMethod then true
else args.any hasLiftMethod
| _ => false
structure ExtractMonadResult where
m : Expr
α : Expr
hasBindInst : Expr
expectedType : Expr
isPure : Bool -- `true` when it is a pure `do` block. That is, Lean implicitly inserted the `Id` Monad.
private def mkIdBindFor (type : Expr) : TermElabM ExtractMonadResult := do
let u ← getDecLevel type
let id := Lean.mkConst ``Id [u]
let idBindVal := Lean.mkConst ``Id.hasBind [u]
pure { m := id, hasBindInst := idBindVal, α := type, expectedType := mkApp id type, isPure := true }
private partial def extractBind (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM ExtractMonadResult := do
match expectedType? with
| none => throwError "invalid 'do' notation, expected type is not available"
| some expectedType =>
let extractStep? (type : Expr) : MetaM (Option ExtractMonadResult) := do
match type with
| Expr.app m α _ =>
try
let bindInstType ← mkAppM ``Bind #[m]
let bindInstVal ← Meta.synthInstance bindInstType
return some { m := m, hasBindInst := bindInstVal, α := α, expectedType := expectedType, isPure := false }
catch _ =>
return none
| _ =>
return none
let rec extract? (type : Expr) : MetaM (Option ExtractMonadResult) := do
match (← extractStep? type) with
| some r => return r
| none =>
let typeNew ← whnfCore type
if typeNew != type then
extract? typeNew
else
if typeNew.getAppFn.isMVar then throwError "invalid 'do' notation, expected type is not available"
match (← unfoldDefinition? typeNew) with
| some typeNew => extract? typeNew
| none => return none
match (← extract? expectedType) with
| some r => return r
| none => mkIdBindFor expectedType
namespace Do
/- A `doMatch` alternative. `vars` is the array of variables declared by `patterns`. -/
structure Alt (σ : Type) where
ref : Syntax
vars : Array Name
patterns : Syntax
rhs : σ
deriving Inhabited
/-
Auxiliary datastructure for representing a `do` code block, and compiling "reassignments" (e.g., `x := x + 1`).
We convert `Code` into a `Syntax` term representing the:
- `do`-block, or
- the visitor argument for the `forIn` combinator.
We say the following constructors are terminals:
- `break`: for interrupting a `for x in s`
- `continue`: for interrupting the current iteration of a `for x in s`
- `return e`: for returning `e` as the result for the whole `do` computation block
- `action a`: for executing action `a` as a terminal
- `ite`: if-then-else
- `match`: pattern matching
- `jmp` a goto to a join-point
We say the terminals `break`, `continue`, `action`, and `return` are "exit points"
Note that, `return e` is not equivalent to `action (pure e)`. Here is an example:
```
def f (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
if x == 0 then
return ()
IO.println "hello"
```
Executing `#eval f 0` will not print "hello". Now, consider
```
def g (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
if x == 0 then
pure ()
IO.println "hello"
```
The `if` statement is essentially a noop, and "hello" is printed when we execute `g 0`.
- `decl` represents all declaration-like `doElem`s (e.g., `let`, `have`, `let rec`).
The field `stx` is the actual `doElem`,
`vars` is the array of variables declared by it, and `cont` is the next instruction in the `do` code block.
`vars` is an array since we have declarations such as `let (a, b) := s`.
- `reassign` is an reassignment-like `doElem` (e.g., `x := x + 1`).
- `joinpoint` is a join point declaration: an auxiliary `let`-declaration used to represent the control-flow.
- `seq a k` executes action `a`, ignores its result, and then executes `k`.
We also store the do-elements `dbg_trace` and `assert!` as actions in a `seq`.
A code block `C` is well-formed if
- For every `jmp ref j as` in `C`, there is a `joinpoint j ps b k` and `jmp ref j as` is in `k`, and
`ps.size == as.size` -/
inductive Code where
| decl (xs : Array Name) (doElem : Syntax) (k : Code)
| reassign (xs : Array Name) (doElem : Syntax) (k : Code)
/- The Boolean value in `params` indicates whether we should use `(x : typeof! x)` when generating term Syntax or not -/
| joinpoint (name : Name) (params : Array (Name × Bool)) (body : Code) (k : Code)
| seq (action : Syntax) (k : Code)
| action (action : Syntax)
| «break» (ref : Syntax)
| «continue» (ref : Syntax)
| «return» (ref : Syntax) (val : Syntax)
/- Recall that an if-then-else may declare a variable using `optIdent` for the branches `thenBranch` and `elseBranch`. We store the variable name at `var?`. -/
| ite (ref : Syntax) (h? : Option Name) (optIdent : Syntax) (cond : Syntax) (thenBranch : Code) (elseBranch : Code)
| «match» (ref : Syntax) (gen : Syntax) (discrs : Syntax) (optType : Syntax) (alts : Array (Alt Code))
| jmp (ref : Syntax) (jpName : Name) (args : Array Syntax)
deriving Inhabited
/- A code block, and the collection of variables updated by it. -/
structure CodeBlock where
code : Code
uvars : NameSet := {} -- set of variables updated by `code`
private def nameSetToArray (s : NameSet) : Array Name :=
s.fold (fun (xs : Array Name) x => xs.push x) #[]
private def varsToMessageData (vars : Array Name) : MessageData :=
MessageData.joinSep (vars.toList.map fun n => MessageData.ofName (n.simpMacroScopes)) " "
partial def CodeBlocl.toMessageData (codeBlock : CodeBlock) : MessageData :=
let us := MessageData.ofList $ (nameSetToArray codeBlock.uvars).toList.map MessageData.ofName
let rec loop : Code → MessageData
| Code.decl xs _ k => m!"let {varsToMessageData xs} := ...\n{loop k}"
| Code.reassign xs _ k => m!"{varsToMessageData xs} := ...\n{loop k}"
| Code.joinpoint n ps body k => m!"let {n.simpMacroScopes} {varsToMessageData (ps.map Prod.fst)} := {indentD (loop body)}\n{loop k}"
| Code.seq e k => m!"{e}\n{loop k}"
| Code.action e => e
| Code.ite _ _ _ c t e => m!"if {c} then {indentD (loop t)}\nelse{loop e}"
| Code.jmp _ j xs => m!"jmp {j.simpMacroScopes} {xs.toList}"
| Code.«break» _ => m!"break {us}"
| Code.«continue» _ => m!"continue {us}"
| Code.«return» _ v => m!"return {v} {us}"
| Code.«match» _ _ ds t alts =>
m!"match {ds} with"
++ alts.foldl (init := m!"") fun acc alt => acc ++ m!"\n| {alt.patterns} => {loop alt.rhs}"
loop codeBlock.code
/- Return true if the give code contains an exit point that satisfies `p` -/
partial def hasExitPointPred (c : Code) (p : Code → Bool) : Bool :=
let rec loop : Code → Bool
| Code.decl _ _ k => loop k
| Code.reassign _ _ k => loop k
| Code.joinpoint _ _ b k => loop b || loop k
| Code.seq _ k => loop k
| Code.ite _ _ _ _ t e => loop t || loop e
| Code.«match» _ _ _ _ alts => alts.any (loop ·.rhs)
| Code.jmp _ _ _ => false
| c => p c
loop c
def hasExitPoint (c : Code) : Bool :=
hasExitPointPred c fun c => true
def hasReturn (c : Code) : Bool :=
hasExitPointPred c fun
| Code.«return» _ _ => true
| _ => false
def hasTerminalAction (c : Code) : Bool :=
hasExitPointPred c fun
| Code.«action» _ => true
| _ => false
def hasBreakContinue (c : Code) : Bool :=
hasExitPointPred c fun
| Code.«break» _ => true
| Code.«continue» _ => true
| _ => false
def hasBreakContinueReturn (c : Code) : Bool :=
hasExitPointPred c fun
| Code.«break» _ => true
| Code.«continue» _ => true
| Code.«return» _ _ => true
| _ => false
def mkAuxDeclFor {m} [Monad m] [MonadQuotation m] (e : Syntax) (mkCont : Syntax → m Code) : m Code := withRef e <| withFreshMacroScope do
let y ← `(y)
let yName := y.getId
let doElem ← `(doElem| let y ← $e:term)
-- Add elaboration hint for producing sane error message
let y ← `(ensureExpectedType% "type mismatch, result value" $y)
let k ← mkCont y
pure $ Code.decl #[yName] doElem k
/- Convert `action _ e` instructions in `c` into `let y ← e; jmp _ jp (xs y)`. -/
partial def convertTerminalActionIntoJmp (code : Code) (jp : Name) (xs : Array Name) : MacroM Code :=
let rec loop : Code → MacroM Code
| Code.decl xs stx k => do Code.decl xs stx (← loop k)
| Code.reassign xs stx k => do Code.reassign xs stx (← loop k)
| Code.joinpoint n ps b k => do Code.joinpoint n ps (← loop b) (← loop k)
| Code.seq e k => do Code.seq e (← loop k)
| Code.ite ref x? h c t e => do Code.ite ref x? h c (← loop t) (← loop e)
| Code.«match» ref g ds t alts => do Code.«match» ref g ds t (← alts.mapM fun alt => do pure { alt with rhs := (← loop alt.rhs) })
| Code.action e => mkAuxDeclFor e fun y =>
let ref := e
-- We jump to `jp` with xs **and** y
let jmpArgs := xs.map $ mkIdentFrom ref
let jmpArgs := jmpArgs.push y
pure $ Code.jmp ref jp jmpArgs
| c => pure c
loop code
structure JPDecl where
name : Name
params : Array (Name × Bool)
body : Code
def attachJP (jpDecl : JPDecl) (k : Code) : Code :=
Code.joinpoint jpDecl.name jpDecl.params jpDecl.body k
def attachJPs (jpDecls : Array JPDecl) (k : Code) : Code :=
jpDecls.foldr attachJP k
def mkFreshJP (ps : Array (Name × Bool)) (body : Code) : TermElabM JPDecl := do
let ps ←
if ps.isEmpty then
let y ← mkFreshUserName `y
pure #[(y, false)]
else
pure ps
-- Remark: the compiler frontend implemented in C++ currently detects jointpoints created by
-- the "do" notation by testing the name. See hack at method `visit_let` at `lcnf.cpp`
-- We will remove this hack when we re-implement the compiler frontend in Lean.
let name ← mkFreshUserName `_do_jp
pure { name := name, params := ps, body := body }
def mkFreshJP' (xs : Array Name) (body : Code) : TermElabM JPDecl :=
mkFreshJP (xs.map fun x => (x, true)) body
def addFreshJP (ps : Array (Name × Bool)) (body : Code) : StateRefT (Array JPDecl) TermElabM Name := do
let jp ← mkFreshJP ps body
modify fun (jps : Array JPDecl) => jps.push jp
pure jp.name
def insertVars (rs : NameSet) (xs : Array Name) : NameSet :=
xs.foldl (·.insert ·) rs
def eraseVars (rs : NameSet) (xs : Array Name) : NameSet :=
xs.foldl (·.erase ·) rs
def eraseOptVar (rs : NameSet) (x? : Option Name) : NameSet :=
match x? with
| none => rs
| some x => rs.insert x
/- Create a new jointpoint for `c`, and jump to it with the variables `rs` -/
def mkSimpleJmp (ref : Syntax) (rs : NameSet) (c : Code) : StateRefT (Array JPDecl) TermElabM Code := do
let xs := nameSetToArray rs
let jp ← addFreshJP (xs.map fun x => (x, true)) c
if xs.isEmpty then
let unit ← ``(Unit.unit)
return Code.jmp ref jp #[unit]
else
return Code.jmp ref jp (xs.map $ mkIdentFrom ref)
/- Create a new joinpoint that takes `rs` and `val` as arguments. `val` must be syntax representing a pure value.
The body of the joinpoint is created using `mkJPBody yFresh`, where `yFresh`
is a fresh variable created by this method. -/
def mkJmp (ref : Syntax) (rs : NameSet) (val : Syntax) (mkJPBody : Syntax → MacroM Code) : StateRefT (Array JPDecl) TermElabM Code := do
let xs := nameSetToArray rs
let args := xs.map $ mkIdentFrom ref
let args := args.push val
let yFresh ← mkFreshUserName `y
let ps := xs.map fun x => (x, true)
let ps := ps.push (yFresh, false)
let jpBody ← liftMacroM $ mkJPBody (mkIdentFrom ref yFresh)
let jp ← addFreshJP ps jpBody
pure $ Code.jmp ref jp args
/- `pullExitPointsAux rs c` auxiliary method for `pullExitPoints`, `rs` is the set of update variable in the current path. -/
partial def pullExitPointsAux : NameSet → Code → StateRefT (Array JPDecl) TermElabM Code
| rs, Code.decl xs stx k => do Code.decl xs stx (← pullExitPointsAux (eraseVars rs xs) k)
| rs, Code.reassign xs stx k => do Code.reassign xs stx (← pullExitPointsAux (insertVars rs xs) k)
| rs, Code.joinpoint j ps b k => do Code.joinpoint j ps (← pullExitPointsAux rs b) (← pullExitPointsAux rs k)
| rs, Code.seq e k => do Code.seq e (← pullExitPointsAux rs k)
| rs, Code.ite ref x? o c t e => do Code.ite ref x? o c (← pullExitPointsAux (eraseOptVar rs x?) t) (← pullExitPointsAux (eraseOptVar rs x?) e)
| rs, Code.«match» ref g ds t alts => do
Code.«match» ref g ds t (← alts.mapM fun alt => do pure { alt with rhs := (← pullExitPointsAux (eraseVars rs alt.vars) alt.rhs) })
| rs, c@(Code.jmp _ _ _) => pure c
| rs, Code.«break» ref => mkSimpleJmp ref rs (Code.«break» ref)
| rs, Code.«continue» ref => mkSimpleJmp ref rs (Code.«continue» ref)
| rs, Code.«return» ref val => mkJmp ref rs val (fun y => pure $ Code.«return» ref y)
| rs, Code.action e =>
-- We use `mkAuxDeclFor` because `e` is not pure.
mkAuxDeclFor e fun y =>
let ref := e
mkJmp ref rs y (fun yFresh => do pure $ Code.action (← ``(Pure.pure $yFresh)))
/-
Auxiliary operation for adding new variables to the collection of updated variables in a CodeBlock.
When a new variable is not already in the collection, but is shadowed by some declaration in `c`,
we create auxiliary join points to make sure we preserve the semantics of the code block.
Example: suppose we have the code block `print x; let x := 10; return x`. And we want to extend it
with the reassignment `x := x + 1`. We first use `pullExitPoints` to create
```
let jp (x!1) := return x!1;
print x;
let x := 10;
jmp jp x
```
and then we add the reassignment
```
x := x + 1
let jp (x!1) := return x!1;
print x;
let x := 10;
jmp jp x
```
Note that we created a fresh variable `x!1` to avoid accidental name capture.
As another example, consider
```
print x;
let x := 10
y := y + 1;
return x;
```
We transform it into
```
let jp (y x!1) := return x!1;
print x;
let x := 10
y := y + 1;
jmp jp y x
```
and then we add the reassignment as in the previous example.
We need to include `y` in the jump, because each exit point is implicitly returning the set of
update variables.
We implement the method as follows. Let `us` be `c.uvars`, then
1- for each `return _ y` in `c`, we create a join point
`let j (us y!1) := return y!1`
and replace the `return _ y` with `jmp us y`
2- for each `break`, we create a join point
`let j (us) := break`
and replace the `break` with `jmp us`.
3- Same as 2 for `continue`.
-/
def pullExitPoints (c : Code) : TermElabM Code := do
if hasExitPoint c then
let (c, jpDecls) ← (pullExitPointsAux {} c).run #[]
pure $ attachJPs jpDecls c
else
pure c
partial def extendUpdatedVarsAux (c : Code) (ws : NameSet) : TermElabM Code :=
let rec update : Code → TermElabM Code
| Code.joinpoint j ps b k => do Code.joinpoint j ps (← update b) (← update k)
| Code.seq e k => do Code.seq e (← update k)
| c@(Code.«match» ref g ds t alts) => do
if alts.any fun alt => alt.vars.any fun x => ws.contains x then
-- If a pattern variable is shadowing a variable in ws, we `pullExitPoints`
pullExitPoints c
else
Code.«match» ref g ds t (← alts.mapM fun alt => do pure { alt with rhs := (← update alt.rhs) })
| Code.ite ref none o c t e => do Code.ite ref none o c (← update t) (← update e)
| c@(Code.ite ref (some h) o cond t e) => do
if ws.contains h then
-- if the `h` at `if h:c then t else e` shadows a variable in `ws`, we `pullExitPoints`
pullExitPoints c
else
Code.ite ref (some h) o cond (← update t) (← update e)
| Code.reassign xs stx k => do Code.reassign xs stx (← update k)
| c@(Code.decl xs stx k) => do
if xs.any fun x => ws.contains x then
-- One the declared variables is shadowing a variable in `ws`
pullExitPoints c
else
Code.decl xs stx (← update k)
| c => pure c
update c
/-
Extend the set of updated variables. It assumes `ws` is a super set of `c.uvars`.
We **cannot** simply update the field `c.uvars`, because `c` may have shadowed some variable in `ws`.
See discussion at `pullExitPoints`.
-/
partial def extendUpdatedVars (c : CodeBlock) (ws : NameSet) : TermElabM CodeBlock := do
if ws.any fun x => !c.uvars.contains x then
-- `ws` contains a variable that is not in `c.uvars`, but in `c.dvars` (i.e., it has been shadowed)
pure { code := (← extendUpdatedVarsAux c.code ws), uvars := ws }
else
pure { c with uvars := ws }
private def union (s₁ s₂ : NameSet) : NameSet :=
s₁.fold (·.insert ·) s₂
/-
Given two code blocks `c₁` and `c₂`, make sure they have the same set of updated variables.
Let `ws` the union of the updated variables in `c₁‵ and ‵c₂`.
We use `extendUpdatedVars c₁ ws` and `extendUpdatedVars c₂ ws`
-/
def homogenize (c₁ c₂ : CodeBlock) : TermElabM (CodeBlock × CodeBlock) := do
let ws := union c₁.uvars c₂.uvars
let c₁ ← extendUpdatedVars c₁ ws
let c₂ ← extendUpdatedVars c₂ ws
pure (c₁, c₂)
/-
Extending code blocks with variable declarations: `let x : t := v` and `let x : t ← v`.
We remove `x` from the collection of updated varibles.
Remark: `stx` is the syntax for the declaration (e.g., `letDecl`), and `xs` are the variables
declared by it. It is an array because we have let-declarations that declare multiple variables.
Example: `let (x, y) := t`
-/
def mkVarDeclCore (xs : Array Name) (stx : Syntax) (c : CodeBlock) : CodeBlock := {
code := Code.decl xs stx c.code,
uvars := eraseVars c.uvars xs
}
/-
Extending code blocks with reassignments: `x : t := v` and `x : t ← v`.
Remark: `stx` is the syntax for the declaration (e.g., `letDecl`), and `xs` are the variables
declared by it. It is an array because we have let-declarations that declare multiple variables.
Example: `(x, y) ← t`
-/
def mkReassignCore (xs : Array Name) (stx : Syntax) (c : CodeBlock) : TermElabM CodeBlock := do
let us := c.uvars
let ws := insertVars us xs
-- If `xs` contains a new updated variable, then we must use `extendUpdatedVars`.
-- See discussion at `pullExitPoints`
let code ← if xs.any fun x => !us.contains x then extendUpdatedVarsAux c.code ws else pure c.code
pure { code := Code.reassign xs stx code, uvars := ws }
def mkSeq (action : Syntax) (c : CodeBlock) : CodeBlock :=
{ c with code := Code.seq action c.code }
def mkTerminalAction (action : Syntax) : CodeBlock :=
{ code := Code.action action }
def mkReturn (ref : Syntax) (val : Syntax) : CodeBlock :=
{ code := Code.«return» ref val }
def mkBreak (ref : Syntax) : CodeBlock :=
{ code := Code.«break» ref }
def mkContinue (ref : Syntax) : CodeBlock :=
{ code := Code.«continue» ref }
def mkIte (ref : Syntax) (optIdent : Syntax) (cond : Syntax) (thenBranch : CodeBlock) (elseBranch : CodeBlock) : TermElabM CodeBlock := do
let x? := if optIdent.isNone then none else some optIdent[0].getId
let (thenBranch, elseBranch) ← homogenize thenBranch elseBranch
pure {
code := Code.ite ref x? optIdent cond thenBranch.code elseBranch.code,
uvars := thenBranch.uvars,
}
private def mkUnit : MacroM Syntax :=
``((⟨⟩ : PUnit))
private def mkPureUnit : MacroM Syntax :=
``(pure PUnit.unit)
def mkPureUnitAction : MacroM CodeBlock := do
mkTerminalAction (← mkPureUnit)
def mkUnless (cond : Syntax) (c : CodeBlock) : MacroM CodeBlock := do
let thenBranch ← mkPureUnitAction
pure { c with code := Code.ite (← getRef) none mkNullNode cond thenBranch.code c.code }
def mkMatch (ref : Syntax) (genParam : Syntax) (discrs : Syntax) (optType : Syntax) (alts : Array (Alt CodeBlock)) : TermElabM CodeBlock := do
-- nary version of homogenize
let ws := alts.foldl (union · ·.rhs.uvars) {}
let alts ← alts.mapM fun alt => do
let rhs ← extendUpdatedVars alt.rhs ws
pure { ref := alt.ref, vars := alt.vars, patterns := alt.patterns, rhs := rhs.code : Alt Code }
pure { code := Code.«match» ref genParam discrs optType alts, uvars := ws }
/- Return a code block that executes `terminal` and then `k` with the value produced by `terminal`.
This method assumes `terminal` is a terminal -/
def concat (terminal : CodeBlock) (kRef : Syntax) (y? : Option Name) (k : CodeBlock) : TermElabM CodeBlock := do
unless hasTerminalAction terminal.code do
throwErrorAt kRef "'do' element is unreachable"
let (terminal, k) ← homogenize terminal k
let xs := nameSetToArray k.uvars
let y ← match y? with | some y => pure y | none => mkFreshUserName `y
let ps := xs.map fun x => (x, true)
let ps := ps.push (y, false)
let jpDecl ← mkFreshJP ps k.code
let jp := jpDecl.name
let terminal ← liftMacroM $ convertTerminalActionIntoJmp terminal.code jp xs
pure { code := attachJP jpDecl terminal, uvars := k.uvars }
def getLetIdDeclVar (letIdDecl : Syntax) : Name :=
letIdDecl[0].getId
-- support both regular and syntax match
def getPatternVarsEx (pattern : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) :=
getPatternVarNames <$> getPatternVars pattern <|>
Array.map Syntax.getId <$> Quotation.getPatternVars pattern
def getPatternsVarsEx (patterns : Array Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) :=
getPatternVarNames <$> getPatternsVars patterns <|>
Array.map Syntax.getId <$> Quotation.getPatternsVars patterns
def getLetPatDeclVars (letPatDecl : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) := do
let pattern := letPatDecl[0]
getPatternVarsEx pattern
def getLetEqnsDeclVar (letEqnsDecl : Syntax) : Name :=
letEqnsDecl[0].getId
def getLetDeclVars (letDecl : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) := do
let arg := letDecl[0]
if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letIdDecl then
pure #[getLetIdDeclVar arg]
else if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letPatDecl then
getLetPatDeclVars arg
else if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letEqnsDecl then
pure #[getLetEqnsDeclVar arg]
else
throwError "unexpected kind of let declaration"
def getDoLetVars (doLet : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) :=
-- leading_parser "let " >> optional "mut " >> letDecl
getLetDeclVars doLet[2]
def getDoHaveVar (doHave : Syntax) : Name :=
/-
`leading_parser "have " >> Term.haveDecl`
where
```
haveDecl := leading_parser optIdent >> termParser >> (haveAssign <|> fromTerm <|> byTactic)
optIdent := optional (try (ident >> " : "))
```
-/
let optIdent := doHave[1][0]
if optIdent.isNone then
`this
else
optIdent[0].getId
def getDoLetRecVars (doLetRec : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) := do
-- letRecDecls is an array of `(group (optional attributes >> letDecl))`
let letRecDecls := doLetRec[1][0].getSepArgs
let letDecls := letRecDecls.map fun p => p[2]
let mut allVars := #[]
for letDecl in letDecls do
let vars ← getLetDeclVars letDecl
allVars := allVars ++ vars
pure allVars
-- ident >> optType >> leftArrow >> termParser
def getDoIdDeclVar (doIdDecl : Syntax) : Name :=
doIdDecl[0].getId
-- termParser >> leftArrow >> termParser >> optional (" | " >> termParser)
def getDoPatDeclVars (doPatDecl : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) := do
let pattern := doPatDecl[0]
getPatternVarsEx pattern
-- leading_parser "let " >> optional "mut " >> (doIdDecl <|> doPatDecl)
def getDoLetArrowVars (doLetArrow : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) := do
let decl := doLetArrow[2]
if decl.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doIdDecl then
pure #[getDoIdDeclVar decl]
else if decl.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doPatDecl then
getDoPatDeclVars decl
else
throwError "unexpected kind of 'do' declaration"
def getDoReassignVars (doReassign : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Name) := do
let arg := doReassign[0]
if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letIdDecl then
pure #[getLetIdDeclVar arg]
else if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letPatDecl then
getLetPatDeclVars arg
else
throwError "unexpected kind of reassignment"
def mkDoSeq (doElems : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.doSeqIndent #[mkNullNode $ doElems.map fun doElem => mkNullNode #[doElem, mkNullNode]]
def mkSingletonDoSeq (doElem : Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkDoSeq #[doElem]
/-
If the given syntax is a `doIf`, return an equivalente `doIf` that has an `else` but no `else if`s or `if let`s. -/
private def expandDoIf? (stx : Syntax) : MacroM (Option Syntax) := match stx with
| `(doElem|if $p:doIfProp then $t else $e) => pure none
| `(doElem|if%$i $cond:doIfCond then $t $[else if%$is $conds:doIfCond then $ts]* $[else $e?]?) => withRef stx do
let mut e := e?.getD (← `(doSeq|pure PUnit.unit))
let mut eIsSeq := true
for (i, cond, t) in Array.zip (is.reverse.push i) (Array.zip (conds.reverse.push cond) (ts.reverse.push t)) do
e ← if eIsSeq then e else `(doSeq|$e:doElem)
e ← withRef cond <| match cond with
| `(doIfCond|let $pat := $d) => `(doElem| match%$i $d:term with | $pat:term => $t | _ => $e)
| `(doIfCond|let $pat ← $d) => `(doElem| match%$i ← $d with | $pat:term => $t | _ => $e)
| `(doIfCond|$cond:doIfProp) => `(doElem| if%$i $cond:doIfProp then $t else $e)
| _ => `(doElem| if%$i $(Syntax.missing) then $t else $e)
eIsSeq := false
return some e
| _ => pure none
structure DoIfView where
ref : Syntax
optIdent : Syntax
cond : Syntax
thenBranch : Syntax
elseBranch : Syntax
/- This method assumes `expandDoIf?` is not applicable. -/
private def mkDoIfView (doIf : Syntax) : MacroM DoIfView := do
pure {
ref := doIf,
optIdent := doIf[1][0],
cond := doIf[1][1],
thenBranch := doIf[3],
elseBranch := doIf[5][1]
}
/-
We use `MProd` instead of `Prod` to group values when expanding the
`do` notation. `MProd` is a universe monomorphic product.
The motivation is to generate simpler universe constraints in code
that was not written by the user.
Note that we are not restricting the macro power since the
`Bind.bind` combinator already forces values computed by monadic
actions to be in the same universe.
-/
private def mkTuple (elems : Array Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
if elems.size == 0 then
mkUnit
else if elems.size == 1 then
pure elems[0]
else
(elems.extract 0 (elems.size - 1)).foldrM
(fun elem tuple => ``(MProd.mk $elem $tuple))
(elems.back)
/- Return `some action` if `doElem` is a `doExpr <action>`-/
def isDoExpr? (doElem : Syntax) : Option Syntax :=
if doElem.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doExpr then
some doElem[0]
else
none
/--
Given `uvars := #[a_1, ..., a_n, a_{n+1}]` construct term
```
let a_1 := x.1
let x := x.2
let a_2 := x.1
let x := x.2
...
let a_n := x.1
let a_{n+1} := x.2
body
```
Special cases
- `uvars := #[]` => `body`
- `uvars := #[a]` => `let a := x; body`
We use this method when expanding the `for-in` notation.
-/
private def destructTuple (uvars : Array Name) (x : Syntax) (body : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
if uvars.size == 0 then
return body
else if uvars.size == 1 then
`(let $(← mkIdentFromRef uvars[0]):ident := $x; $body)
else
destruct uvars.toList x body
where
destruct (as : List Name) (x : Syntax) (body : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
match as with
| [a, b] => `(let $(← mkIdentFromRef a):ident := $x.1; let $(← mkIdentFromRef b):ident := $x.2; $body)
| a :: as => withFreshMacroScope do
let rest ← destruct as (← `(x)) body
`(let $(← mkIdentFromRef a):ident := $x.1; let x := $x.2; $rest)
| _ => unreachable!
/-
The procedure `ToTerm.run` converts a `CodeBlock` into a `Syntax` term.
We use this method to convert
1- The `CodeBlock` for a root `do ...` term into a `Syntax` term. This kind of
`CodeBlock` never contains `break` nor `continue`. Moreover, the collection
of updated variables is not packed into the result.
Thus, we have two kinds of exit points
- `Code.action e` which is converted into `e`
- `Code.return _ e` which is converted into `pure e`
We use `Kind.regular` for this case.
2- The `CodeBlock` for `b` at `for x in xs do b`. In this case, we need to generate
a `Syntax` term representing a function for the `xs.forIn` combinator.
a) If `b` contain a `Code.return _ a` exit point. The generated `Syntax` term
has type `m (ForInStep (Option α × σ))`, where `a : α`, and the `σ` is the type
of the tuple of variables reassigned by `b`.
We use `Kind.forInWithReturn` for this case
b) If `b` does not contain a `Code.return _ a` exit point. Then, the generated
`Syntax` term has type `m (ForInStep σ)`.
We use `Kind.forIn` for this case.
3- The `CodeBlock` `c` for a `do` sequence nested in a monadic combinator (e.g., `MonadExcept.tryCatch`).
The generated `Syntax` term for `c` must inform whether `c` "exited" using `Code.action`, `Code.return`,
`Code.break` or `Code.continue`. We use the auxiliary types `DoResult`s for storing this information.
For example, the auxiliary type `DoResultPBC α σ` is used for a code block that exits with `Code.action`,
**and** `Code.break`/`Code.continue`, `α` is the type of values produced by the exit `action`, and
`σ` is the type of the tuple of reassigned variables.
The type `DoResult α β σ` is usedf for code blocks that exit with
`Code.action`, `Code.return`, **and** `Code.break`/`Code.continue`, `β` is the type of the returned values.
We don't use `DoResult α β σ` for all cases because:
a) The elaborator would not be able to infer all type parameters without extra annotations. For example,
if the code block does not contain `Code.return _ _`, the elaborator will not be able to infer `β`.
b) We need to pattern match on the result produced by the combinator (e.g., `MonadExcept.tryCatch`),
but we don't want to consider "unreachable" cases.
We do not distinguish between cases that contain `break`, but not `continue`, and vice versa.
When listing all cases, we use `a` to indicate the code block contains `Code.action _`, `r` for `Code.return _ _`,
and `b/c` for a code block that contains `Code.break _` or `Code.continue _`.
- `a`: `Kind.regular`, type `m (α × σ)`
- `r`: `Kind.regular`, type `m (α × σ)`
Note that the code that pattern matches on the result will behave differently in this case.
It produces `return a` for this case, and `pure a` for the previous one.
- `b/c`: `Kind.nestedBC`, type `m (DoResultBC σ)`
- `a` and `r`: `Kind.nestedPR`, type `m (DoResultPR α β σ)`
- `a` and `bc`: `Kind.nestedSBC`, type `m (DoResultSBC α σ)`
- `r` and `bc`: `Kind.nestedSBC`, type `m (DoResultSBC α σ)`
Again the code that pattern matches on the result will behave differently in this case and
the previous one. It produces `return a` for the constructor `DoResultSPR.pureReturn a u` for
this case, and `pure a` for the previous case.
- `a`, `r`, `b/c`: `Kind.nestedPRBC`, type type `m (DoResultPRBC α β σ)`
Here is the recipe for adding new combinators with nested `do`s.
Example: suppose we want to support `repeat doSeq`. Assuming we have `repeat : m α → m α`
1- Convert `doSeq` into `codeBlock : CodeBlock`
2- Create term `term` using `mkNestedTerm code m uvars a r bc` where
`code` is `codeBlock.code`, `uvars` is an array containing `codeBlock.uvars`,
`m` is a `Syntax` representing the Monad, and
`a` is true if `code` contains `Code.action _`,
`r` is true if `code` contains `Code.return _ _`,
`bc` is true if `code` contains `Code.break _` or `Code.continue _`.
Remark: for combinators such as `repeat` that take a single `doSeq`, all
arguments, but `m`, are extracted from `codeBlock`.
3- Create the term `repeat $term`
4- and then, convert it into a `doSeq` using `matchNestedTermResult ref (repeat $term) uvsar a r bc`
-/
namespace ToTerm
inductive Kind where
| regular
| forIn
| forInWithReturn
| nestedBC
| nestedPR
| nestedSBC
| nestedPRBC
instance : Inhabited Kind := ⟨Kind.regular⟩
def Kind.isRegular : Kind → Bool
| Kind.regular => true
| _ => false
structure Context where
m : Syntax -- Syntax to reference the monad associated with the do notation.
uvars : Array Name
kind : Kind
abbrev M := ReaderT Context MacroM
def mkUVarTuple : M Syntax := do
let ctx ← read
let uvarIdents ← ctx.uvars.mapM mkIdentFromRef
mkTuple uvarIdents
def returnToTerm (val : Syntax) : M Syntax := do
let ctx ← read
let u ← mkUVarTuple
match ctx.kind with
| Kind.regular => if ctx.uvars.isEmpty then ``(Pure.pure $val) else ``(Pure.pure (MProd.mk $val $u))
| Kind.forIn => ``(Pure.pure (ForInStep.done $u))
| Kind.forInWithReturn => ``(Pure.pure (ForInStep.done (MProd.mk (some $val) $u)))
| Kind.nestedBC => unreachable!
| Kind.nestedPR => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultPR.«return» $val $u))
| Kind.nestedSBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultSBC.«pureReturn» $val $u))
| Kind.nestedPRBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultPRBC.«return» $val $u))
def continueToTerm : M Syntax := do
let ctx ← read
let u ← mkUVarTuple
match ctx.kind with
| Kind.regular => unreachable!
| Kind.forIn => ``(Pure.pure (ForInStep.yield $u))
| Kind.forInWithReturn => ``(Pure.pure (ForInStep.yield (MProd.mk none $u)))
| Kind.nestedBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultBC.«continue» $u))
| Kind.nestedPR => unreachable!
| Kind.nestedSBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultSBC.«continue» $u))
| Kind.nestedPRBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultPRBC.«continue» $u))
def breakToTerm : M Syntax := do
let ctx ← read
let u ← mkUVarTuple
match ctx.kind with
| Kind.regular => unreachable!
| Kind.forIn => ``(Pure.pure (ForInStep.done $u))
| Kind.forInWithReturn => ``(Pure.pure (ForInStep.done (MProd.mk none $u)))
| Kind.nestedBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultBC.«break» $u))
| Kind.nestedPR => unreachable!
| Kind.nestedSBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultSBC.«break» $u))
| Kind.nestedPRBC => ``(Pure.pure (DoResultPRBC.«break» $u))
def actionTerminalToTerm (action : Syntax) : M Syntax := withRef action <| withFreshMacroScope do
let ctx ← read
let u ← mkUVarTuple
match ctx.kind with
| Kind.regular => if ctx.uvars.isEmpty then pure action else ``(Bind.bind $action fun y => Pure.pure (MProd.mk y $u))
| Kind.forIn => ``(Bind.bind $action fun (_ : PUnit) => Pure.pure (ForInStep.yield $u))
| Kind.forInWithReturn => ``(Bind.bind $action fun (_ : PUnit) => Pure.pure (ForInStep.yield (MProd.mk none $u)))
| Kind.nestedBC => unreachable!
| Kind.nestedPR => ``(Bind.bind $action fun y => (Pure.pure (DoResultPR.«pure» y $u)))
| Kind.nestedSBC => ``(Bind.bind $action fun y => (Pure.pure (DoResultSBC.«pureReturn» y $u)))
| Kind.nestedPRBC => ``(Bind.bind $action fun y => (Pure.pure (DoResultPRBC.«pure» y $u)))
def seqToTerm (action : Syntax) (k : Syntax) : M Syntax := withRef action <| withFreshMacroScope do
if action.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doDbgTrace then
let msg := action[1]
`(dbg_trace $msg; $k)
else if action.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doAssert then
let cond := action[1]
`(assert! $cond; $k)
else
let action ← withRef action ``(($action : $((←read).m) PUnit))
``(Bind.bind $action (fun (_ : PUnit) => $k))
def declToTerm (decl : Syntax) (k : Syntax) : M Syntax := withRef decl <| withFreshMacroScope do
let kind := decl.getKind
if kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLet then
let letDecl := decl[2]
`(let $letDecl:letDecl; $k)
else if kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetRec then
let letRecToken := decl[0]
let letRecDecls := decl[1]
pure $ mkNode ``Lean.Parser.Term.letrec #[letRecToken, letRecDecls, mkNullNode, k]
else if kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetArrow then
let arg := decl[2]
let ref := arg
if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doIdDecl then
let id := arg[0]
let type := expandOptType id arg[1]
let doElem := arg[3]
-- `doElem` must be a `doExpr action`. See `doLetArrowToCode`
match isDoExpr? doElem with
| some action =>
let action ← withRef action `(($action : $((← read).m) $type))
``(Bind.bind $action (fun ($id:ident : $type) => $k))
| none => Macro.throwErrorAt decl "unexpected kind of 'do' declaration"
else
Macro.throwErrorAt decl "unexpected kind of 'do' declaration"
else if kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doHave then
-- The `have` term is of the form `"have " >> haveDecl >> optSemicolon termParser`
let args := decl.getArgs
let args := args ++ #[mkNullNode /- optional ';' -/, k]
pure $ mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.«have» args
else
Macro.throwErrorAt decl "unexpected kind of 'do' declaration"
def reassignToTerm (reassign : Syntax) (k : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := withRef reassign <| withFreshMacroScope do
let kind := reassign.getKind
if kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doReassign then
-- doReassign := leading_parser (letIdDecl <|> letPatDecl)
let arg := reassign[0]
if arg.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.letIdDecl then
-- letIdDecl := leading_parser ident >> many (ppSpace >> bracketedBinder) >> optType >> " := " >> termParser
let x := arg[0]
let val := arg[4]
let newVal ← `(ensureTypeOf% $x $(quote "invalid reassignment, value") $val)
let arg := arg.setArg 4 newVal
let letDecl := mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.letDecl #[arg]
`(let $letDecl:letDecl; $k)
else
-- TODO: ensure the types did not change
let letDecl := mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.letDecl #[arg]
`(let $letDecl:letDecl; $k)
else
-- Note that `doReassignArrow` is expanded by `doReassignArrowToCode
Macro.throwErrorAt reassign "unexpected kind of 'do' reassignment"
def mkIte (optIdent : Syntax) (cond : Syntax) (thenBranch : Syntax) (elseBranch : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
if optIdent.isNone then
``(ite $cond $thenBranch $elseBranch)
else
let h := optIdent[0]
``(dite $cond (fun $h => $thenBranch) (fun $h => $elseBranch))
def mkJoinPoint (j : Name) (ps : Array (Name × Bool)) (body : Syntax) (k : Syntax) : M Syntax := withRef body <| withFreshMacroScope do
let pTypes ← ps.mapM fun ⟨id, useTypeOf⟩ => do if useTypeOf then `(typeOf% $(← mkIdentFromRef id)) else `(_)
let ps ← ps.mapM fun ⟨id, useTypeOf⟩ => mkIdentFromRef id
/-
We use `let_delayed` instead of `let` for joinpoints to make sure `$k` is elaborated before `$body`.
By elaborating `$k` first, we "learn" more about `$body`'s type.
For example, consider the following example `do` expression
```
def f (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
if x > 0 then
IO.println "x is not zero" -- Error is here
IO.mkRef true
```
it is expanded into
```
def f (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
let jp (u : Unit) : IO _ :=
IO.mkRef true;
if x > 0 then
IO.println "not zero"
jp ()
else
jp ()
```
If we use the regular `let` instead of `let_delayed`, the joinpoint `jp` will be elaborated and its type will be inferred to be `Unit → IO (IO.Ref Bool)`.
Then, we get a typing error at `jp ()`. By using `let_delayed`, we first elaborate `if x > 0 ...` and learn that `jp` has type `Unit → IO Unit`.
Then, we get the expected type mismatch error at `IO.mkRef true`. -/
`(let_delayed $(← mkIdentFromRef j):ident $[($ps : $pTypes)]* : $((← read).m) _ := $body; $k)
def mkJmp (ref : Syntax) (j : Name) (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
Syntax.mkApp (mkIdentFrom ref j) args
partial def toTerm : Code → M Syntax
| Code.«return» ref val => withRef ref <| returnToTerm val
| Code.«continue» ref => withRef ref continueToTerm
| Code.«break» ref => withRef ref breakToTerm
| Code.action e => actionTerminalToTerm e
| Code.joinpoint j ps b k => do mkJoinPoint j ps (← toTerm b) (← toTerm k)
| Code.jmp ref j args => pure $ mkJmp ref j args
| Code.decl _ stx k => do declToTerm stx (← toTerm k)
| Code.reassign _ stx k => do reassignToTerm stx (← toTerm k)
| Code.seq stx k => do seqToTerm stx (← toTerm k)
| Code.ite ref _ o c t e => withRef ref <| do mkIte o c (← toTerm t) (← toTerm e)
| Code.«match» ref genParam discrs optType alts => do
let mut termAlts := #[]
for alt in alts do
let rhs ← toTerm alt.rhs
let termAlt := mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.matchAlt #[mkAtomFrom alt.ref "|", alt.patterns, mkAtomFrom alt.ref "=>", rhs]
termAlts := termAlts.push termAlt
let termMatchAlts := mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.matchAlts #[mkNullNode termAlts]
pure $ mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.«match» #[mkAtomFrom ref "match", genParam, discrs, optType, mkAtomFrom ref "with", termMatchAlts]
def run (code : Code) (m : Syntax) (uvars : Array Name := #[]) (kind := Kind.regular) : MacroM Syntax := do
let term ← toTerm code { m := m, kind := kind, uvars := uvars }
pure term
/- Given
- `a` is true if the code block has a `Code.action _` exit point
- `r` is true if the code block has a `Code.return _ _` exit point
- `bc` is true if the code block has a `Code.break _` or `Code.continue _` exit point
generate Kind. See comment at the beginning of the `ToTerm` namespace. -/
def mkNestedKind (a r bc : Bool) : Kind :=
match a, r, bc with
| true, false, false => Kind.regular
| false, true, false => Kind.regular
| false, false, true => Kind.nestedBC
| true, true, false => Kind.nestedPR
| true, false, true => Kind.nestedSBC
| false, true, true => Kind.nestedSBC
| true, true, true => Kind.nestedPRBC
| false, false, false => unreachable!
def mkNestedTerm (code : Code) (m : Syntax) (uvars : Array Name) (a r bc : Bool) : MacroM Syntax := do
ToTerm.run code m uvars (mkNestedKind a r bc)
/- Given a term `term` produced by `ToTerm.run`, pattern match on its result.
See comment at the beginning of the `ToTerm` namespace.
- `a` is true if the code block has a `Code.action _` exit point
- `r` is true if the code block has a `Code.return _ _` exit point
- `bc` is true if the code block has a `Code.break _` or `Code.continue _` exit point
The result is a sequence of `doElem` -/
def matchNestedTermResult (term : Syntax) (uvars : Array Name) (a r bc : Bool) : MacroM (List Syntax) := do
let toDoElems (auxDo : Syntax) : List Syntax := getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo)
let u ← mkTuple (← uvars.mapM mkIdentFromRef)
match a, r, bc with
| true, false, false =>
if uvars.isEmpty then
toDoElems (← `(do $term:term))
else
toDoElems (← `(do let r ← $term:term; $u:term := r.2; pure r.1))
| false, true, false =>
if uvars.isEmpty then
toDoElems (← `(do let r ← $term:term; return r))
else
toDoElems (← `(do let r ← $term:term; $u:term := r.2; return r.1))
| false, false, true => toDoElems <$>
`(do let r ← $term:term;
match r with
| DoResultBC.«break» u => $u:term := u; break
| DoResultBC.«continue» u => $u:term := u; continue)
| true, true, false => toDoElems <$>
`(do let r ← $term:term;
match r with
| DoResultPR.«pure» a u => $u:term := u; pure a
| DoResultPR.«return» b u => $u:term := u; return b)
| true, false, true => toDoElems <$>
`(do let r ← $term:term;
match r with
| DoResultSBC.«pureReturn» a u => $u:term := u; pure a
| DoResultSBC.«break» u => $u:term := u; break
| DoResultSBC.«continue» u => $u:term := u; continue)
| false, true, true => toDoElems <$>
`(do let r ← $term:term;
match r with
| DoResultSBC.«pureReturn» a u => $u:term := u; return a
| DoResultSBC.«break» u => $u:term := u; break
| DoResultSBC.«continue» u => $u:term := u; continue)
| true, true, true => toDoElems <$>
`(do let r ← $term:term;
match r with
| DoResultPRBC.«pure» a u => $u:term := u; pure a
| DoResultPRBC.«return» a u => $u:term := u; return a
| DoResultPRBC.«break» u => $u:term := u; break
| DoResultPRBC.«continue» u => $u:term := u; continue)
| false, false, false => unreachable!
end ToTerm
def isMutableLet (doElem : Syntax) : Bool :=
let kind := doElem.getKind
(kind == `Lean.Parser.Term.doLetArrow || kind == `Lean.Parser.Term.doLet)
&&
!doElem[1].isNone
namespace ToCodeBlock
structure Context where
ref : Syntax
m : Syntax -- Syntax representing the monad associated with the do notation.
mutableVars : NameSet := {}
insideFor : Bool := false
abbrev M := ReaderT Context TermElabM
def withNewMutableVars {α} (newVars : Array Name) (mutable : Bool) (x : M α) : M α :=
withReader (fun ctx => if mutable then { ctx with mutableVars := insertVars ctx.mutableVars newVars } else ctx) x
def checkReassignable (xs : Array Name) : M Unit := do
let throwInvalidReassignment (x : Name) : M Unit :=
throwError "'{x.simpMacroScopes}' cannot be reassigned"
let ctx ← read
for x in xs do
unless ctx.mutableVars.contains x do
throwInvalidReassignment x
def checkNotShadowingMutable (xs : Array Name) : M Unit := do
let throwInvalidShadowing (x : Name) : M Unit :=
throwError "mutable variable '{x.simpMacroScopes}' cannot be shadowed"
let ctx ← read
for x in xs do
if ctx.mutableVars.contains x then
throwInvalidShadowing x
def withFor {α} (x : M α) : M α :=
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with insideFor := true }) x
structure ToForInTermResult where
uvars : Array Name
term : Syntax
def mkForInBody (x : Syntax) (forInBody : CodeBlock) : M ToForInTermResult := do
let ctx ← read
let uvars := forInBody.uvars
let uvars := nameSetToArray uvars
let term ← liftMacroM $ ToTerm.run forInBody.code ctx.m uvars (if hasReturn forInBody.code then ToTerm.Kind.forInWithReturn else ToTerm.Kind.forIn)
pure ⟨uvars, term⟩
def ensureInsideFor : M Unit :=
unless (← read).insideFor do
throwError "invalid 'do' element, it must be inside 'for'"
def ensureEOS (doElems : List Syntax) : M Unit :=
unless doElems.isEmpty do
throwError "must be last element in a 'do' sequence"
private partial def expandLiftMethodAux (inQuot : Bool) (inBinder : Bool) : Syntax → StateT (List Syntax) M Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node k args) =>
if liftMethodDelimiter k then
return stx
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.liftMethod && !inQuot then withFreshMacroScope do
if inBinder then
throwErrorAt stx "cannot lift `(<- ...)` over a binder, this error usually happens when you are trying to lift a method nested in a `fun`, `let`, or `match`-alternative, and it can often be fixed by adding a missing `do`"
let term := args[1]
let term ← expandLiftMethodAux inQuot inBinder term
let auxDoElem ← `(doElem| let a ← $term:term)
modify fun s => s ++ [auxDoElem]
`(a)
else do
let inAntiquot := stx.isAntiquot && !stx.isEscapedAntiquot
let inBinder := inBinder || (!inQuot && liftMethodForbiddenBinder stx)
let args ← args.mapM (expandLiftMethodAux (inQuot && !inAntiquot || stx.isQuot) inBinder)
return Syntax.node k args
| stx => pure stx
def expandLiftMethod (doElem : Syntax) : M (List Syntax × Syntax) := do
if !hasLiftMethod doElem then
pure ([], doElem)
else
let (doElem, doElemsNew) ← (expandLiftMethodAux false false doElem).run []
pure (doElemsNew, doElem)
def checkLetArrowRHS (doElem : Syntax) : M Unit := do
let kind := doElem.getKind
if kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetArrow ||
kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLet ||
kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetRec ||
kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doHave ||
kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doReassign ||
kind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doReassignArrow then
throwErrorAt doElem "invalid kind of value '{kind}' in an assignment"
/- Generate `CodeBlock` for `doReturn` which is of the form
```
"return " >> optional termParser
```
`doElems` is only used for sanity checking. -/
def doReturnToCode (doReturn : Syntax) (doElems: List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := withRef doReturn do
ensureEOS doElems
let argOpt := doReturn[1]
let arg ← if argOpt.isNone then liftMacroM mkUnit else pure argOpt[0]
return mkReturn (← getRef) arg
structure Catch where
x : Syntax
optType : Syntax
codeBlock : CodeBlock
def getTryCatchUpdatedVars (tryCode : CodeBlock) (catches : Array Catch) (finallyCode? : Option CodeBlock) : NameSet :=
let ws := tryCode.uvars
let ws := catches.foldl (fun ws alt => union alt.codeBlock.uvars ws) ws
let ws := match finallyCode? with
| none => ws
| some c => union c.uvars ws
ws
def tryCatchPred (tryCode : CodeBlock) (catches : Array Catch) (finallyCode? : Option CodeBlock) (p : Code → Bool) : Bool :=
p tryCode.code ||
catches.any (fun «catch» => p «catch».codeBlock.code) ||
match finallyCode? with
| none => false
| some finallyCode => p finallyCode.code
mutual
/- "Concatenate" `c` with `doSeqToCode doElems` -/
partial def concatWith (c : CodeBlock) (doElems : List Syntax) : M CodeBlock :=
match doElems with
| [] => pure c
| nextDoElem :: _ => do
let k ← doSeqToCode doElems
let ref := nextDoElem
concat c ref none k
/- Generate `CodeBlock` for `doLetArrow; doElems`
`doLetArrow` is of the form
```
"let " >> optional "mut " >> (doIdDecl <|> doPatDecl)
```
where
```
def doIdDecl := leading_parser ident >> optType >> leftArrow >> doElemParser
def doPatDecl := leading_parser termParser >> leftArrow >> doElemParser >> optional (" | " >> doElemParser)
```
-/
partial def doLetArrowToCode (doLetArrow : Syntax) (doElems : List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := do
let ref := doLetArrow
let decl := doLetArrow[2]
if decl.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doIdDecl then
let y := decl[0].getId
checkNotShadowingMutable #[y]
let doElem := decl[3]
let k ← withNewMutableVars #[y] (isMutableLet doLetArrow) (doSeqToCode doElems)
match isDoExpr? doElem with
| some action => pure $ mkVarDeclCore #[y] doLetArrow k
| none =>
checkLetArrowRHS doElem
let c ← doSeqToCode [doElem]
match doElems with
| [] => pure c
| kRef::_ => concat c kRef y k
else if decl.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doPatDecl then
let pattern := decl[0]
let doElem := decl[2]
let optElse := decl[3]
if optElse.isNone then withFreshMacroScope do
let auxDo ←
if isMutableLet doLetArrow then
`(do let discr ← $doElem; let mut $pattern:term := discr)
else
`(do let discr ← $doElem; let $pattern:term := discr)
doSeqToCode <| getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo) ++ doElems
else
if isMutableLet doLetArrow then
throwError "'mut' is currently not supported in let-decls with 'else' case"
let contSeq := mkDoSeq doElems.toArray
let elseSeq := mkSingletonDoSeq optElse[1]
let auxDo ← `(do let discr ← $doElem; match discr with | $pattern:term => $contSeq | _ => $elseSeq)
doSeqToCode <| getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo)
else
throwError "unexpected kind of 'do' declaration"
/- Generate `CodeBlock` for `doReassignArrow; doElems`
`doReassignArrow` is of the form
```
(doIdDecl <|> doPatDecl)
```
-/
partial def doReassignArrowToCode (doReassignArrow : Syntax) (doElems : List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := do
let ref := doReassignArrow
let decl := doReassignArrow[0]
if decl.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doIdDecl then
let doElem := decl[3]
let y := decl[0]
let auxDo ← `(do let r ← $doElem; $y:ident := r)
doSeqToCode <| getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo) ++ doElems
else if decl.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doPatDecl then
let pattern := decl[0]
let doElem := decl[2]
let optElse := decl[3]
if optElse.isNone then withFreshMacroScope do
let auxDo ← `(do let discr ← $doElem; $pattern:term := discr)
doSeqToCode <| getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo) ++ doElems
else
throwError "reassignment with `|` (i.e., \"else clause\") is not currently supported"
else
throwError "unexpected kind of 'do' reassignment"
/- Generate `CodeBlock` for `doIf; doElems`
`doIf` is of the form
```
"if " >> optIdent >> termParser >> " then " >> doSeq
>> many (group (try (group (" else " >> " if ")) >> optIdent >> termParser >> " then " >> doSeq))
>> optional (" else " >> doSeq)
``` -/
partial def doIfToCode (doIf : Syntax) (doElems : List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := do
let view ← liftMacroM $ mkDoIfView doIf
let thenBranch ← doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems view.thenBranch)
let elseBranch ← doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems view.elseBranch)
let ite ← mkIte view.ref view.optIdent view.cond thenBranch elseBranch
concatWith ite doElems
/- Generate `CodeBlock` for `doUnless; doElems`
`doUnless` is of the form
```
"unless " >> termParser >> "do " >> doSeq
``` -/
partial def doUnlessToCode (doUnless : Syntax) (doElems : List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := withRef doUnless do
let ref := doUnless
let cond := doUnless[1]
let doSeq := doUnless[3]
let body ← doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems doSeq)
let unlessCode ← liftMacroM <| mkUnless cond body
concatWith unlessCode doElems
/- Generate `CodeBlock` for `doFor; doElems`
`doFor` is of the form
```
def doForDecl := leading_parser termParser >> " in " >> withForbidden "do" termParser
def doFor := leading_parser "for " >> sepBy1 doForDecl ", " >> "do " >> doSeq
```
-/
partial def doForToCode (doFor : Syntax) (doElems : List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := do
let doForDecls := doFor[1].getSepArgs
if doForDecls.size > 1 then
/-
Expand
```
for x in xs, y in ys do
body
```
into
```
let s := toStream ys
for x in xs do
match Stream.next? s with
| none => break
| some (y, s') =>
s := s'
body
```
-/
-- Extract second element
let doForDecl := doForDecls[1]
let y := doForDecl[0]
let ys := doForDecl[2]
let doForDecls := doForDecls.eraseIdx 1
let body := doFor[3]
withFreshMacroScope do
let toStreamFn ← withRef ys ``(toStream)
let auxDo ←
`(do let mut s := $toStreamFn:ident $ys
for $doForDecls:doForDecl,* do
match Stream.next? s with
| none => break
| some ($y, s') =>
s := s'
do $body)
doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo) ++ doElems)
else withRef doFor do
let x := doForDecls[0][0]
withRef x <| checkNotShadowingMutable (← getPatternVarsEx x)
let xs := doForDecls[0][2]
let forElems := getDoSeqElems doFor[3]
let forInBodyCodeBlock ← withFor (doSeqToCode forElems)
let ⟨uvars, forInBody⟩ ← mkForInBody x forInBodyCodeBlock
let uvarsTuple ← liftMacroM do mkTuple (← uvars.mapM mkIdentFromRef)
if hasReturn forInBodyCodeBlock.code then
let forInBody ← liftMacroM <| destructTuple uvars (← `(r)) forInBody
let forInTerm ← `(forIn% $(xs) (MProd.mk none $uvarsTuple) fun $x r => let r := r.2; $forInBody)
let auxDo ← `(do let r ← $forInTerm:term;
$uvarsTuple:term := r.2;
match r.1 with
| none => Pure.pure (ensureExpectedType% "type mismatch, 'for'" PUnit.unit)
| some a => return ensureExpectedType% "type mismatch, 'for'" a)
doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo) ++ doElems)
else
let forInBody ← liftMacroM <| destructTuple uvars (← `(r)) forInBody
let forInTerm ← `(forIn% $(xs) $uvarsTuple fun $x r => $forInBody)
if doElems.isEmpty then
let auxDo ← `(do let r ← $forInTerm:term;
$uvarsTuple:term := r;
Pure.pure (ensureExpectedType% "type mismatch, 'for'" PUnit.unit))
doSeqToCode <| getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo)
else
let auxDo ← `(do let r ← $forInTerm:term; $uvarsTuple:term := r)
doSeqToCode <| getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo) ++ doElems
/-- Generate `CodeBlock` for `doMatch; doElems` -/
partial def doMatchToCode (doMatch : Syntax) (doElems: List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := do
let ref := doMatch
let genParam := doMatch[1]
let discrs := doMatch[2]
let optType := doMatch[3]
let matchAlts := doMatch[5][0].getArgs -- Array of `doMatchAlt`
let alts ← matchAlts.mapM fun matchAlt => do
let patterns := matchAlt[1]
let vars ← getPatternsVarsEx patterns.getSepArgs
withRef patterns <| checkNotShadowingMutable vars
let rhs := matchAlt[3]
let rhs ← doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems rhs)
pure { ref := matchAlt, vars := vars, patterns := patterns, rhs := rhs : Alt CodeBlock }
let matchCode ← mkMatch ref genParam discrs optType alts
concatWith matchCode doElems
/--
Generate `CodeBlock` for `doTry; doElems`
```
def doTry := leading_parser "try " >> doSeq >> many (doCatch <|> doCatchMatch) >> optional doFinally
def doCatch := leading_parser "catch " >> binderIdent >> optional (":" >> termParser) >> darrow >> doSeq
def doCatchMatch := leading_parser "catch " >> doMatchAlts
def doFinally := leading_parser "finally " >> doSeq
```
-/
partial def doTryToCode (doTry : Syntax) (doElems: List Syntax) : M CodeBlock := do
let ref := doTry
let tryCode ← doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems doTry[1])
let optFinally := doTry[3]
let catches ← doTry[2].getArgs.mapM fun catchStx => do
if catchStx.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doCatch then
let x := catchStx[1]
if x.isIdent then
withRef x <| checkNotShadowingMutable #[x.getId]
let optType := catchStx[2]
let c ← doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems catchStx[4])
pure { x := x, optType := optType, codeBlock := c : Catch }
else if catchStx.getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doCatchMatch then
let matchAlts := catchStx[1]
let x ← `(ex)
let auxDo ← `(do match ex with $matchAlts)
let c ← doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems (getDoSeq auxDo))
pure { x := x, codeBlock := c, optType := mkNullNode : Catch }
else
throwError "unexpected kind of 'catch'"
let finallyCode? ← if optFinally.isNone then pure none else some <$> doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems optFinally[0][1])
if catches.isEmpty && finallyCode?.isNone then
throwError "invalid 'try', it must have a 'catch' or 'finally'"
let ctx ← read
let ws := getTryCatchUpdatedVars tryCode catches finallyCode?
let uvars := nameSetToArray ws
let a := tryCatchPred tryCode catches finallyCode? hasTerminalAction
let r := tryCatchPred tryCode catches finallyCode? hasReturn
let bc := tryCatchPred tryCode catches finallyCode? hasBreakContinue
let toTerm (codeBlock : CodeBlock) : M Syntax := do
let codeBlock ← liftM $ extendUpdatedVars codeBlock ws
liftMacroM $ ToTerm.mkNestedTerm codeBlock.code ctx.m uvars a r bc
let term ← toTerm tryCode
let term ← catches.foldlM
(fun term «catch» => do
let catchTerm ← toTerm «catch».codeBlock
if catch.optType.isNone then
``(MonadExcept.tryCatch $term (fun $(«catch».x):ident => $catchTerm))
else
let type := «catch».optType[1]
``(tryCatchThe $type $term (fun $(«catch».x):ident => $catchTerm)))
term
let term ← match finallyCode? with
| none => pure term
| some finallyCode => withRef optFinally do
unless finallyCode.uvars.isEmpty do
throwError "'finally' currently does not support reassignments"
if hasBreakContinueReturn finallyCode.code then
throwError "'finally' currently does 'return', 'break', nor 'continue'"
let finallyTerm ← liftMacroM <| ToTerm.run finallyCode.code ctx.m {} ToTerm.Kind.regular
``(tryFinally $term $finallyTerm)
let doElemsNew ← liftMacroM <| ToTerm.matchNestedTermResult term uvars a r bc
doSeqToCode (doElemsNew ++ doElems)
partial def doSeqToCode : List Syntax → M CodeBlock
| [] => do liftMacroM mkPureUnitAction
| doElem::doElems => withIncRecDepth <| withRef doElem do
checkMaxHeartbeats "'do'-expander"
match (← liftMacroM <| expandMacro? doElem) with
| some doElem => doSeqToCode (doElem::doElems)
| none =>
match (← liftMacroM <| expandDoIf? doElem) with
| some doElem => doSeqToCode (doElem::doElems)
| none =>
let (liftedDoElems, doElem) ← expandLiftMethod doElem
if !liftedDoElems.isEmpty then
doSeqToCode (liftedDoElems ++ [doElem] ++ doElems)
else
let ref := doElem
let concatWithRest (c : CodeBlock) : M CodeBlock := concatWith c doElems
let k := doElem.getKind
if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLet then
let vars ← getDoLetVars doElem
checkNotShadowingMutable vars
mkVarDeclCore vars doElem <$> withNewMutableVars vars (isMutableLet doElem) (doSeqToCode doElems)
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doHave then
let var := getDoHaveVar doElem
checkNotShadowingMutable #[var]
mkVarDeclCore #[var] doElem <$> (doSeqToCode doElems)
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetRec then
let vars ← getDoLetRecVars doElem
checkNotShadowingMutable vars
mkVarDeclCore vars doElem <$> (doSeqToCode doElems)
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doReassign then
let vars ← getDoReassignVars doElem
checkReassignable vars
let k ← doSeqToCode doElems
mkReassignCore vars doElem k
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doLetArrow then
doLetArrowToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doReassignArrow then
doReassignArrowToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doIf then
doIfToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doUnless then
doUnlessToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doFor then withFreshMacroScope do
doForToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doMatch then
doMatchToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doTry then
doTryToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doBreak then
ensureInsideFor
ensureEOS doElems
return mkBreak ref
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doContinue then
ensureInsideFor
ensureEOS doElems
return mkContinue ref
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doReturn then
doReturnToCode doElem doElems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doDbgTrace then
return mkSeq doElem (← doSeqToCode doElems)
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doAssert then
return mkSeq doElem (← doSeqToCode doElems)
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doNested then
let nestedDoSeq := doElem[1]
doSeqToCode (getDoSeqElems nestedDoSeq ++ doElems)
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doExpr then
let term := doElem[0]
if doElems.isEmpty then
return mkTerminalAction term
else
return mkSeq term (← doSeqToCode doElems)
else
throwError "unexpected do-element of kind {doElem.getKind}:\n{doElem}"
end
def run (doStx : Syntax) (m : Syntax) : TermElabM CodeBlock :=
(doSeqToCode <| getDoSeqElems <| getDoSeq doStx).run { ref := doStx, m }
end ToCodeBlock
/- Create a synthetic metavariable `?m` and assign `m` to it.
We use `?m` to refer to `m` when expanding the `do` notation. -/
private def mkMonadAlias (m : Expr) : TermElabM Syntax := do
let result ← `(?m)
let mType ← inferType m
let mvar ← elabTerm result mType
assignExprMVar mvar.mvarId! m
pure result
private partial def ensureArrowNotUsed : Syntax → MacroM Unit
| stx@(Syntax.node k args) => do
if k == ``Parser.Term.liftMethod || k == ``Parser.Term.doLetArrow || k == ``Parser.Term.doReassignArrow || k == ``Parser.Term.doIfLetBind then
Macro.throwErrorAt stx "`←` and `<-` are not allowed in pure `do` blocks, i.e., blocks where Lean implicitly used the `Id` monad"
args.forM ensureArrowNotUsed
| _ => pure ()
@[builtinTermElab «do»]
def elabDo : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
tryPostponeIfNoneOrMVar expectedType?
let bindInfo ← extractBind expectedType?
if bindInfo.isPure then
liftMacroM <| ensureArrowNotUsed stx
let m ← mkMonadAlias bindInfo.m
let codeBlock ← ToCodeBlock.run stx m
let stxNew ← liftMacroM $ ToTerm.run codeBlock.code m
trace[Elab.do] stxNew
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ elabTermEnsuringType stxNew bindInfo.expectedType
end Do
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Elab.do
private def toDoElem (newKind : SyntaxNodeKind) : Macro := fun stx => do
let stx := stx.setKind newKind
withRef stx `(do $stx:doElem)
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.termFor]
def expandTermFor : Macro := toDoElem ``Lean.Parser.Term.doFor
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.termTry]
def expandTermTry : Macro := toDoElem ``Lean.Parser.Term.doTry
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.termUnless]
def expandTermUnless : Macro := toDoElem ``Lean.Parser.Term.doUnless
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.termReturn]
def expandTermReturn : Macro := toDoElem ``Lean.Parser.Term.doReturn
end Lean.Elab.Term
|
218dc4c48a27df2fc8be26b4d427a07f76da5b94 | 592ee40978ac7604005a4e0d35bbc4b467389241 | /Library/generated/mathscheme-lean/LeftSpindle_Shelf.lean | 50b206d5f0ef5e363695896ff87fe8fd6b021891 | [] | no_license | ysharoda/Deriving-Definitions | 3e149e6641fae440badd35ac110a0bd705a49ad2 | dfecb27572022de3d4aa702cae8db19957523a59 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,127,857,700 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 229,785,731 | 4 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,515 | lean | import init.data.nat.basic
import init.data.fin.basic
import data.vector
import .Prelude
open Staged
open nat
open fin
open vector
section LeftSpindle_Shelf
structure LeftSpindle_Shelf (A : Type) : Type :=
(linv : (A → (A → A)))
(leftDistributive : (∀ {x y z : A} , (linv x (linv y z)) = (linv (linv x y) (linv x z))))
(idempotent_linv : (∀ {x : A} , (linv x x) = x))
(rinv : (A → (A → A)))
(rightDistributive : (∀ {x y z : A} , (rinv (rinv y z) x) = (rinv (rinv y x) (rinv z x))))
open LeftSpindle_Shelf
structure Sig (AS : Type) : Type :=
(linvS : (AS → (AS → AS)))
(rinvS : (AS → (AS → AS)))
structure Product (A : Type) : Type :=
(linvP : ((Prod A A) → ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A))))
(rinvP : ((Prod A A) → ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A))))
(leftDistributiveP : (∀ {xP yP zP : (Prod A A)} , (linvP xP (linvP yP zP)) = (linvP (linvP xP yP) (linvP xP zP))))
(idempotent_linvP : (∀ {xP : (Prod A A)} , (linvP xP xP) = xP))
(rightDistributiveP : (∀ {xP yP zP : (Prod A A)} , (rinvP (rinvP yP zP) xP) = (rinvP (rinvP yP xP) (rinvP zP xP))))
structure Hom {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (Le1 : (LeftSpindle_Shelf A1)) (Le2 : (LeftSpindle_Shelf A2)) : Type :=
(hom : (A1 → A2))
(pres_linv : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} , (hom ((linv Le1) x1 x2)) = ((linv Le2) (hom x1) (hom x2))))
(pres_rinv : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} , (hom ((rinv Le1) x1 x2)) = ((rinv Le2) (hom x1) (hom x2))))
structure RelInterp {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (Le1 : (LeftSpindle_Shelf A1)) (Le2 : (LeftSpindle_Shelf A2)) : Type 1 :=
(interp : (A1 → (A2 → Type)))
(interp_linv : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} {y1 y2 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → ((interp x2 y2) → (interp ((linv Le1) x1 x2) ((linv Le2) y1 y2))))))
(interp_rinv : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} {y1 y2 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → ((interp x2 y2) → (interp ((rinv Le1) x1 x2) ((rinv Le2) y1 y2))))))
inductive LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm : Type
| linvL : (LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → (LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm))
| rinvL : (LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → (LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm))
open LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm
inductive ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm (A : Type) : Type
| sing : (A → ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm)
| linvCl : (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm))
| rinvCl : (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm))
open ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm
inductive OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm (n : ℕ) : Type
| v : ((fin n) → OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm)
| linvOL : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm))
| rinvOL : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm))
open OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm
inductive OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 (n : ℕ) (A : Type) : Type
| v2 : ((fin n) → OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2)
| sing2 : (A → OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2)
| linvOL2 : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 → (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 → OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2))
| rinvOL2 : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 → (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 → OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2))
open OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2
def simplifyCl {A : Type} : ((ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A) → (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A))
| (linvCl x1 x2) := (linvCl (simplifyCl x1) (simplifyCl x2))
| (rinvCl x1 x2) := (rinvCl (simplifyCl x1) (simplifyCl x2))
| (sing x1) := (sing x1)
def simplifyOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n) → (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n))
| (linvOL x1 x2) := (linvOL (simplifyOpB x1) (simplifyOpB x2))
| (rinvOL x1 x2) := (rinvOL (simplifyOpB x1) (simplifyOpB x2))
| (v x1) := (v x1)
def simplifyOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A) → (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A))
| (linvOL2 x1 x2) := (linvOL2 (simplifyOp x1) (simplifyOp x2))
| (rinvOL2 x1 x2) := (rinvOL2 (simplifyOp x1) (simplifyOp x2))
| (v2 x1) := (v2 x1)
| (sing2 x1) := (sing2 x1)
def evalB {A : Type} : ((LeftSpindle_Shelf A) → (LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → A))
| Le (linvL x1 x2) := ((linv Le) (evalB Le x1) (evalB Le x2))
| Le (rinvL x1 x2) := ((rinv Le) (evalB Le x1) (evalB Le x2))
def evalCl {A : Type} : ((LeftSpindle_Shelf A) → ((ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A) → A))
| Le (sing x1) := x1
| Le (linvCl x1 x2) := ((linv Le) (evalCl Le x1) (evalCl Le x2))
| Le (rinvCl x1 x2) := ((rinv Le) (evalCl Le x1) (evalCl Le x2))
def evalOpB {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((LeftSpindle_Shelf A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n) → A)))
| Le vars (v x1) := (nth vars x1)
| Le vars (linvOL x1 x2) := ((linv Le) (evalOpB Le vars x1) (evalOpB Le vars x2))
| Le vars (rinvOL x1 x2) := ((rinv Le) (evalOpB Le vars x1) (evalOpB Le vars x2))
def evalOp {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((LeftSpindle_Shelf A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A) → A)))
| Le vars (v2 x1) := (nth vars x1)
| Le vars (sing2 x1) := x1
| Le vars (linvOL2 x1 x2) := ((linv Le) (evalOp Le vars x1) (evalOp Le vars x2))
| Le vars (rinvOL2 x1 x2) := ((rinv Le) (evalOp Le vars x1) (evalOp Le vars x2))
def inductionB {P : (LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → Type)} : ((∀ (x1 x2 : LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (linvL x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (rinvL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm) , (P x))))
| plinvl prinvl (linvL x1 x2) := (plinvl _ _ (inductionB plinvl prinvl x1) (inductionB plinvl prinvl x2))
| plinvl prinvl (rinvL x1 x2) := (prinvl _ _ (inductionB plinvl prinvl x1) (inductionB plinvl prinvl x2))
def inductionCl {A : Type} {P : ((ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A) → Type)} : ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing x1))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (linvCl x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (rinvCl x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A)) , (P x)))))
| psing plinvcl prinvcl (sing x1) := (psing x1)
| psing plinvcl prinvcl (linvCl x1 x2) := (plinvcl _ _ (inductionCl psing plinvcl prinvcl x1) (inductionCl psing plinvcl prinvcl x2))
| psing plinvcl prinvcl (rinvCl x1 x2) := (prinvcl _ _ (inductionCl psing plinvcl prinvcl x1) (inductionCl psing plinvcl prinvcl x2))
def inductionOpB {n : ℕ} {P : ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v fin))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (linvOL x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (rinvOL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n)) , (P x)))))
| pv plinvol prinvol (v x1) := (pv x1)
| pv plinvol prinvol (linvOL x1 x2) := (plinvol _ _ (inductionOpB pv plinvol prinvol x1) (inductionOpB pv plinvol prinvol x2))
| pv plinvol prinvol (rinvOL x1 x2) := (prinvol _ _ (inductionOpB pv plinvol prinvol x1) (inductionOpB pv plinvol prinvol x2))
def inductionOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} {P : ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v2 fin))) → ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing2 x1))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (linvOL2 x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (rinvOL2 x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A)) , (P x))))))
| pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 (v2 x1) := (pv2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 (sing2 x1) := (psing2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 (linvOL2 x1 x2) := (plinvol2 _ _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 x1) (inductionOp pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 x2))
| pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 (rinvOL2 x1 x2) := (prinvol2 _ _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 x1) (inductionOp pv2 psing2 plinvol2 prinvol2 x2))
def stageB : (LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm → (Staged LeftSpindle_ShelfTerm))
| (linvL x1 x2) := (stage2 linvL (codeLift2 linvL) (stageB x1) (stageB x2))
| (rinvL x1 x2) := (stage2 rinvL (codeLift2 rinvL) (stageB x1) (stageB x2))
def stageCl {A : Type} : ((ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A) → (Staged (ClLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm A)))
| (sing x1) := (Now (sing x1))
| (linvCl x1 x2) := (stage2 linvCl (codeLift2 linvCl) (stageCl x1) (stageCl x2))
| (rinvCl x1 x2) := (stage2 rinvCl (codeLift2 rinvCl) (stageCl x1) (stageCl x2))
def stageOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n) → (Staged (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm n)))
| (v x1) := (const (code (v x1)))
| (linvOL x1 x2) := (stage2 linvOL (codeLift2 linvOL) (stageOpB x1) (stageOpB x2))
| (rinvOL x1 x2) := (stage2 rinvOL (codeLift2 rinvOL) (stageOpB x1) (stageOpB x2))
def stageOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A) → (Staged (OpLeftSpindle_ShelfTerm2 n A)))
| (sing2 x1) := (Now (sing2 x1))
| (v2 x1) := (const (code (v2 x1)))
| (linvOL2 x1 x2) := (stage2 linvOL2 (codeLift2 linvOL2) (stageOp x1) (stageOp x2))
| (rinvOL2 x1 x2) := (stage2 rinvOL2 (codeLift2 rinvOL2) (stageOp x1) (stageOp x2))
structure StagedRepr (A : Type) (Repr : (Type → Type)) : Type :=
(linvT : ((Repr A) → ((Repr A) → (Repr A))))
(rinvT : ((Repr A) → ((Repr A) → (Repr A))))
end LeftSpindle_Shelf |
e6aa9e31f8ad83f3fc5c11a46b73fbaf15fc63c8 | ce6917c5bacabee346655160b74a307b4a5ab620 | /src/ch3/ex0211.lean | 0e62130052721f18ccce773fed7bef641d0424ca | [] | no_license | Ailrun/Theorem_Proving_in_Lean | ae6a23f3c54d62d401314d6a771e8ff8b4132db2 | 2eb1b5caf93c6a5a555c79e9097cf2ba5a66cf68 | refs/heads/master | 1,609,838,270,467 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 240,967,761 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 78 | lean | variables p q : Prop
variable hp : p
theorem t1 : q → p := λ (hq : q), hp
|
a701b4d3d9fc1b81e9a6d4b81a8201a1fb7217e4 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/category_theory/sites/closed.lean | 8e8c0cc40eafe5af580de71e11333228b314909b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,156 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types
import order.closure
/-!
# Closed sieves
A natural closure operator on sieves is a closure operator on `sieve X` for each `X` which commutes
with pullback.
We show that a Grothendieck topology `J` induces a natural closure operator, and define what the
closed sieves are. The collection of `J`-closed sieves forms a presheaf which is a sheaf for `J`,
and further this presheaf can be used to determine the Grothendieck topology from the sheaf
predicate.
Finally we show that a natural closure operator on sieves induces a Grothendieck topology, and hence
that natural closure operators are in bijection with Grothendieck topologies.
## Main definitions
* `category_theory.grothendieck_topology.close`: Sends a sieve `S` on `X` to the set of arrows
which it covers. This has all the usual properties of a closure operator, as well as commuting
with pullback.
* `category_theory.grothendieck_topology.closure_operator`: The bundled `closure_operator` given
by `category_theory.grothendieck_topology.close`.
* `category_theory.grothendieck_topology.closed`: A sieve `S` on `X` is closed for the topology `J`
if it contains every arrow it covers.
* `category_theory.functor.closed_sieves`: The presheaf sending `X` to the collection of `J`-closed
sieves on `X`. This is additionally shown to be a sheaf for `J`, and if this is a sheaf for a
different topology `J'`, then `J' ≤ J`.
* `category_theory.grothendieck_topology.topology_of_closure_operator`: A closure operator on the
set of sieves on every object which commutes with pullback additionally induces a Grothendieck
topology, giving a bijection with `category_theory.grothendieck_topology.closure_operator`.
## Tags
closed sieve, closure, Grothendieck topology
## References
* [S. MacLane, I. Moerdijk, *Sheaves in Geometry and Logic*][MM92]
-/
universes v u
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
variables (J₁ J₂ : grothendieck_topology C)
namespace grothendieck_topology
/-- The `J`-closure of a sieve is the collection of arrows which it covers. -/
@[simps]
def close {X : C} (S : sieve X) : sieve X :=
{ arrows := λ Y f, J₁.covers S f,
downward_closed' := λ Y Z f hS, J₁.arrow_stable _ _ hS }
/-- Any sieve is smaller than its closure. -/
lemma le_close {X : C} (S : sieve X) : S ≤ J₁.close S :=
λ Y g hg, J₁.covering_of_eq_top (S.pullback_eq_top_of_mem hg)
/--
A sieve is closed for the Grothendieck topology if it contains every arrow it covers.
In the case of the usual topology on a topological space, this means that the open cover contains
every open set which it covers.
Note this has no relation to a closed subset of a topological space.
-/
def is_closed {X : C} (S : sieve X) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), J₁.covers S f → S f
/-- If `S` is `J₁`-closed, then `S` covers exactly the arrows it contains. -/
lemma covers_iff_mem_of_closed {X : C} {S : sieve X}
(h : J₁.is_closed S) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
J₁.covers S f ↔ S f :=
⟨h _, J₁.arrow_max _ _⟩
/-- Being `J`-closed is stable under pullback. -/
lemma is_closed_pullback {X Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : sieve X) :
J₁.is_closed S → J₁.is_closed (S.pullback f) :=
λ hS Z g hg, hS (g ≫ f) (by rwa [J₁.covers_iff, sieve.pullback_comp])
/--
The closure of a sieve `S` is the largest closed sieve which contains `S` (justifying the name
"closure").
-/
lemma le_close_of_is_closed {X : C} {S T : sieve X}
(h : S ≤ T) (hT : J₁.is_closed T) :
J₁.close S ≤ T :=
λ Y f hf, hT _ (J₁.superset_covering (sieve.pullback_monotone f h) hf)
/-- The closure of a sieve is closed. -/
lemma close_is_closed {X : C} (S : sieve X) : J₁.is_closed (J₁.close S) :=
λ Y g hg, J₁.arrow_trans g _ S hg (λ Z h hS, hS)
/-- The sieve `S` is closed iff its closure is equal to itself. -/
lemma is_closed_iff_close_eq_self {X : C} (S : sieve X) :
J₁.is_closed S ↔ J₁.close S = S :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros Y f hf,
rw ← J₁.covers_iff_mem_of_closed h,
apply hf },
{ apply J₁.le_close } },
{ intro e,
rw ← e,
apply J₁.close_is_closed }
end
lemma close_eq_self_of_is_closed {X : C} {S : sieve X} (hS : J₁.is_closed S) :
J₁.close S = S :=
(J₁.is_closed_iff_close_eq_self S).1 hS
/-- Closing under `J` is stable under pullback. -/
lemma pullback_close {X Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : sieve X) :
J₁.close (S.pullback f) = (J₁.close S).pullback f :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine J₁.le_close_of_is_closed (sieve.pullback_monotone _ (J₁.le_close S)) _,
apply J₁.is_closed_pullback _ _ (J₁.close_is_closed _) },
{ intros Z g hg,
change _ ∈ J₁ _,
rw ← sieve.pullback_comp,
apply hg }
end
@[mono]
lemma monotone_close {X : C} :
monotone (J₁.close : sieve X → sieve X) :=
λ S₁ S₂ h, J₁.le_close_of_is_closed (h.trans (J₁.le_close _)) (J₁.close_is_closed S₂)
@[simp]
lemma close_close {X : C} (S : sieve X) :
J₁.close (J₁.close S) = J₁.close S :=
le_antisymm
(J₁.le_close_of_is_closed (le_refl _) (J₁.close_is_closed S))
(J₁.monotone_close (J₁.le_close _))
/--
The sieve `S` is in the topology iff its closure is the maximal sieve. This shows that the closure
operator determines the topology.
-/
lemma close_eq_top_iff_mem {X : C} (S : sieve X) :
J₁.close S = ⊤ ↔ S ∈ J₁ X :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
apply J₁.transitive (J₁.top_mem X),
intros Y f hf,
change J₁.close S f,
rwa h },
{ intro hS,
rw eq_top_iff,
intros Y f hf,
apply J₁.pullback_stable _ hS }
end
/-- A Grothendieck topology induces a natural family of closure operators on sieves. -/
@[simps {rhs_md := semireducible}]
def closure_operator (X : C) : closure_operator (sieve X) :=
closure_operator.mk'
J₁.close
(λ S₁ S₂ h, J₁.le_close_of_is_closed (h.trans (J₁.le_close _)) (J₁.close_is_closed S₂))
J₁.le_close
(λ S, J₁.le_close_of_is_closed (le_refl _) (J₁.close_is_closed S))
@[simp]
lemma closed_iff_closed {X : C} (S : sieve X) :
S ∈ (J₁.closure_operator X).closed ↔ J₁.is_closed S :=
(J₁.is_closed_iff_close_eq_self S).symm
end grothendieck_topology
/--
The presheaf sending each object to the set of `J`-closed sieves on it. This presheaf is a `J`-sheaf
(and will turn out to be a subobject classifier for the category of `J`-sheaves).
-/
@[simps]
def functor.closed_sieves : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type (max v u) :=
{ obj := λ X, {S : sieve X.unop // J₁.is_closed S},
map := λ X Y f S, ⟨S.1.pullback f.unop, J₁.is_closed_pullback f.unop _ S.2⟩ }
/--
The presheaf of `J`-closed sieves is a `J`-sheaf.
The proof of this is adapted from [MM92], Chatper III, Section 7, Lemma 1.
-/
lemma classifier_is_sheaf : presieve.is_sheaf J₁ (functor.closed_sieves J₁) :=
begin
intros X S hS,
rw ← presieve.is_separated_for_and_exists_is_amalgamation_iff_sheaf_for,
refine ⟨_, _⟩,
{ rintro x ⟨M, hM⟩ ⟨N, hN⟩ hM₂ hN₂,
ext,
dsimp only [subtype.coe_mk],
rw [← J₁.covers_iff_mem_of_closed hM, ← J₁.covers_iff_mem_of_closed hN],
have q : ∀ ⦃Z : C⦄ (g : Z ⟶ X) (hg : S g), M.pullback g = N.pullback g,
{ intros Z g hg,
apply congr_arg subtype.val ((hM₂ g hg).trans (hN₂ g hg).symm) },
have MSNS : M ⊓ S = N ⊓ S,
{ ext Z g,
rw [sieve.inter_apply, sieve.inter_apply, and_comm (N g), and_comm],
apply and_congr_right,
intro hg,
rw [sieve.pullback_eq_top_iff_mem, sieve.pullback_eq_top_iff_mem, q g hg] },
split,
{ intro hf,
rw J₁.covers_iff,
apply J₁.superset_covering (sieve.pullback_monotone f inf_le_left),
rw ← MSNS,
apply J₁.arrow_intersect f M S hf (J₁.pullback_stable _ hS) },
{ intro hf,
rw J₁.covers_iff,
apply J₁.superset_covering (sieve.pullback_monotone f inf_le_left),
rw MSNS,
apply J₁.arrow_intersect f N S hf (J₁.pullback_stable _ hS) } },
{ intros x hx,
rw presieve.compatible_iff_sieve_compatible at hx,
let M := sieve.bind S (λ Y f hf, (x f hf).1),
have : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : S f), M.pullback f = (x f hf).1,
{ intros Y f hf,
apply le_antisymm,
{ rintro Z u ⟨W, g, f', hf', (hg : (x f' hf').1 _), c⟩,
rw [sieve.pullback_eq_top_iff_mem,
←(show (x (u ≫ f) _).1 = (x f hf).1.pullback u, from congr_arg subtype.val (hx f u hf))],
simp_rw ← c,
rw (show (x (g ≫ f') _).1 = _, from congr_arg subtype.val (hx f' g hf')),
apply sieve.pullback_eq_top_of_mem _ hg },
{ apply sieve.le_pullback_bind S (λ Y f hf, (x f hf).1) } },
refine ⟨⟨_, J₁.close_is_closed M⟩, _⟩,
{ intros Y f hf,
ext1,
dsimp,
rw [← J₁.pullback_close, this _ hf],
apply le_antisymm (J₁.le_close_of_is_closed (le_refl _) (x f hf).2) (J₁.le_close _) } },
end
/--
If presheaf of `J₁`-closed sieves is a `J₂`-sheaf then `J₁ ≤ J₂`. Note the converse is true by
`classifier_is_sheaf` and `is_sheaf_of_le`.
-/
lemma le_topology_of_closed_sieves_is_sheaf {J₁ J₂ : grothendieck_topology C}
(h : presieve.is_sheaf J₁ (functor.closed_sieves J₂)) :
J₁ ≤ J₂ :=
λ X S hS,
begin
rw ← J₂.close_eq_top_iff_mem,
have : J₂.is_closed (⊤ : sieve X),
{ intros Y f hf,
trivial },
suffices : (⟨J₂.close S, J₂.close_is_closed S⟩ : subtype _) = ⟨⊤, this⟩,
{ rw subtype.ext_iff at this,
exact this },
apply (h S hS).is_separated_for.ext,
{ intros Y f hf,
ext1,
dsimp,
rw [sieve.pullback_top, ← J₂.pullback_close, S.pullback_eq_top_of_mem hf,
J₂.close_eq_top_iff_mem],
apply J₂.top_mem },
end
/-- If being a sheaf for `J₁` is equivalent to being a sheaf for `J₂`, then `J₁ = J₂`. -/
lemma topology_eq_iff_same_sheaves {J₁ J₂ : grothendieck_topology C} :
J₁ = J₂ ↔ (∀ (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type (max v u)), presieve.is_sheaf J₁ P ↔ presieve.is_sheaf J₂ P) :=
begin
split,
{ rintro rfl,
intro P,
refl },
{ intro h,
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply le_topology_of_closed_sieves_is_sheaf,
rw h,
apply classifier_is_sheaf },
{ apply le_topology_of_closed_sieves_is_sheaf,
rw ← h,
apply classifier_is_sheaf } }
end
/--
A closure (increasing, inflationary and idempotent) operation on sieves that commutes with pullback
induces a Grothendieck topology.
In fact, such operations are in bijection with Grothendieck topologies.
-/
@[simps]
def topology_of_closure_operator
(c : Π (X : C), closure_operator (sieve X))
(hc : Π ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : sieve X), c _ (S.pullback f) = (c _ S).pullback f) :
grothendieck_topology C :=
{ sieves := λ X, {S | c X S = ⊤},
top_mem' := λ X, top_unique ((c X).le_closure _),
pullback_stable' := λ X Y S f hS,
begin
rw set.mem_set_of_eq at hS,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, hc, hS, sieve.pullback_top],
end,
transitive' := λ X S hS R hR,
begin
rw set.mem_set_of_eq at hS,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, ←(c X).idempotent, eq_top_iff, ←hS],
apply (c X).monotone (λ Y f hf, _),
rw [sieve.pullback_eq_top_iff_mem, ←hc],
apply hR hf,
end }
/--
The topology given by the closure operator `J.close` on a Grothendieck topology is the same as `J`.
-/
lemma topology_of_closure_operator_self :
topology_of_closure_operator J₁.closure_operator (λ X Y, J₁.pullback_close) = J₁ :=
begin
ext X S,
apply grothendieck_topology.close_eq_top_iff_mem,
end
lemma topology_of_closure_operator_close
(c : Π (X : C), closure_operator (sieve X))
(pb : Π ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : sieve X), c Y (S.pullback f) = (c X S).pullback f)
(X : C) (S : sieve X) :
(topology_of_closure_operator c pb).close S = c X S :=
begin
ext,
change c _ (sieve.pullback f S) = ⊤ ↔ c _ S f,
rw [pb, sieve.pullback_eq_top_iff_mem],
end
end category_theory
|
30fa0a6eaca08fcdb5ee54f130445ed6e1e22d87 | 048b0801f6dafb6486ca4f22bd0957671c3002ff | /src/basic/list.lean | 628ee62c142eb0a528b297016fe4442cd0136a24 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Scikud/lean-gym | e0782e36389ecfa1605a0c12dc95f67014a0fa05 | a1ca851b7c09eca1f72be2d059e3ed5536348b0b | refs/heads/main | 1,693,940,033,482 | 1,633,522,864,000 | 1,633,522,864,000 | 419,793,692 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,638 | lean | /- Author: E.W.Ayers © 2019.
Copied from the lean-tpe projcet: https://github.com/jesse-michael-han/lean-tpe-public
Some additional helpers for working with lists.
I suspect that I have duplicated some functionality here.
-/
import data.list basic.control
universe u
namespace list
variables {α β : Type u} {T : Type u → Type u}
def mmapi_core [applicative T] (f : nat → α → T β) : nat → list α → T (list β)
| n [] := pure []
| n (h :: t) := pure (::) <*> f n h <*> mmapi_core (n+1) t
def mmapi [applicative T] (f : nat → α → T β) : list α → T (list β) :=
mmapi_core f 0
def mpicki_core [alternative T] (p : nat → α → T β) : nat → list α → T β
| i [] := failure
| i (h :: t) := p i h <|> mpicki_core (i+1) t
def mpicki [alternative T] (p : nat → α → T β) : list α → T β := mpicki_core p 0
def picki (p : nat → α → option β) : list α → option β := mpicki p
def mpick [alternative T] (p : α → T β) : list α → T β := mpicki_core (λ _, p) 0
def pick (p : α → option β) : list α → option β := mpick p
/-- Returns true if at least one item returns true under `p`.-/
def m_some {T : Type → Type u} [monad T] (p : α → T bool) : list α → T bool
| [] := pure ff
| (h :: t) := do b ← p h, if b then pure tt else m_some t
def m_all {T : Type → Type u} [monad T] (p : α → T bool) : list α → T bool
| l := bnot <$> (m_some (λ x, bnot <$> p x) l)
def find_with_index_core (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : nat → list α → option (α × nat)
| i [] := none
| i (h :: t) := if p h then some ⟨h,i⟩ else find_with_index_core (i+1) t
def mfind_with_index (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → option (α × nat) :=
find_with_index_core p 0
private def partition_sum_fold : α ⊕ β → list α × list β → list α × list β
| (sum.inl a) (as,bs) := (a::as,bs)
| (sum.inr b) (as,bs) := (as,b::bs)
def partition_sum : list (α ⊕ β) → list α × list β
| l := foldr partition_sum_fold ([],[]) l
def ohead : list α → option α
| [] := none
| (h :: t) := some h
def olast : list α → option α
| [x] := some x
| [] := none
| (h :: t) := olast t
/-- Find the maximum according to the given function. -/
def max_by (f : α → int) (l : list α) : option α :=
prod.fst <$> foldl (λ (acc : option(α×ℤ)) x, let m := f x in option.cases_on acc (some ⟨x,m⟩) (λ ⟨_,m'⟩, if m < m' then acc else some ⟨x,m⟩)) none l
def min_by (f : α → int) (l : list α) : option α := max_by (has_neg.neg ∘ f) l
def achoose [alternative T] (f : α → T β) : list α → T (list β)
| [] := pure []
| (h :: t) := ((pure cons <*> f h) <|> pure id) <*> achoose t
def apick [monad T] [alternative T] (f : α → T β) : list α → T β
| [] := failure
| (h :: t) := f h <|> (pure (punit.star) >>= λ _, apick t)
def mchoose [applicative T] (f : α → T (option β)) : list α → T (list β)
| [] := pure []
| (h :: t) := pure (@option.rec β (λ _, list β → list β) id cons) <*> f h <*> mchoose t
/-- Same as filter but explicitly takes a boolean.-/
def bfilter : (α → bool) → list α → list α
| f a := filter (λ x, f x) a
def bfind : (α → bool) → list α → option α
| f a := find (λ x, f x) a
def bfind_index (f : α → bool) : list α → option nat
| [] := none
| (h :: t) := if f h then some 0 else nat.succ <$> bfind_index t
/-- `subtract x y` is some `z` when `∃ z, x = y ++ z` -/
def subtract [decidable_eq α]: (list α) → (list α) → option (list α)
| a [] := some a -- [] ++ a = a
| [] _ := none -- (h::t) ++ _ ≠ []
-- if t₂ ++ z = t₁ then (h₁ :: t₁) ++ z = (h₁ :: t₂)
| (h₁ :: t₁) (h₂ :: t₂) := if h₁ = h₂ then subtract t₁ t₂ else none
def opartition (f : α → option β) : list α → list β × list α :=
foldr (λ x, option.rec_on (f x) (prod.map id $ cons x) $ λ b, prod.map (cons b) id) ([],[])
def apartition [alternative T] (f : α → T β) : list α → T (list β × list α)
| [] := pure $ ([],[])
| (h::rest) :=
pure (λ (o : option β) p, option.rec_on o (prod.map id (cons h) p) (λ b, prod.map (cons b) id p))
<*> ((some <$> f h) <|> pure none)
<*> apartition rest
def eq_by (e : α → α → bool) : list α → list α → bool
| [] [] := tt
| [] (_ :: _) := ff
| (_ :: _) [] := ff
| (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂) := e a₁ a₂ ∧ eq_by l₁ l₂
def collect {β} (f : α → list β) : list α → list β
| l := bind l f
def mcollect {T} [monad T] (f : α → T (list β)) : list α → T (list β)
|l := mfoldl (λ acc x, (++ acc) <$> f x) [] l
def msome {T} [monad T] {α} (f : α → T bool) : list α → T bool
|[] := pure ff
|(h::t) := f h >>= λ x, if x then pure tt else msome t
/-- `skip n l` returns `l` with the first `n` elements removed. If `n > l.length` it returns the empty list -/
def skip {α} : ℕ → list α → list α
|0 l := l
|(n+1) [] := []
|(n+1) (h::t) := skip n t
meta def get_equivalence_classes {T : Type → Type} [monad T] {α : Type} (rel : α → α → T bool) : list α → T(list (list α))
| l := do
x ← mfoldl (λ table h, do
pr : option ((α × list α) × nat) ← @mpicki _ _ (T ∘ option) _ (λ i e,
((do
b ← rel (prod.fst e) h,
pure $ if b then some (e,i) else none
) : T (option _))
) table,
pure $ match pr with
| none := (h,[h]) :: table
| (some ⟨x,i⟩) := table.update_nth i $ prod.map id (cons h) x
end
) [] $ l,
pure $ reverse $ map (reverse ∘ prod.snd) $ x
/-- Perform the given pair reduction to neighbours in the list until you can't anymore. -/
meta def pair_rewrite {m : Type u → Type} [monad m] [alternative m] (rr : α → α → m (α)) : list α → m (list α)
| [] := pure []
| [x] := pure [x]
| (x :: y :: rest) := do
(do z ← rr x y,
pair_rewrite (z :: rest)
) <|> (do
res ← pair_rewrite (y :: rest),
match res with
| [] := pure [x]
| (y2 :: rest2) := (do
z ← rr x y2,
pair_rewrite (z :: rest2)
) <|> (pure $ x :: y2 :: rest2)
end
)
def with_indices : list α → list (nat × α) := list.map_with_index prod.mk
def msplit {T : Type u → Type u} [monad T] {α β γ : Type u} (p : α → T (β ⊕ γ))
: list α → T (list β × list γ)
| l := do
⟨xs,ys⟩ ← l.mfoldl (λ (xsys : list β × list γ) a, do
⟨xs,ys⟩ ← pure xsys,
r ← p a,
pure $ sum.rec_on r (λ x, ⟨x::xs,ys⟩) (λ y, ⟨xs,y::ys⟩)
) (⟨[],[]⟩),
pure ⟨xs.reverse,ys.reverse⟩
end list |
00b3eb3e729e1ea39be0423806ff87c8a307b867 | c8af905dcd8475f414868d303b2eb0e9d3eb32f9 | /src/tactic/custom_wf.lean | db23ae0d622761eef57dc51f40229b1c422ff4a6 | [
"BSD-3-Clause"
] | permissive | continuouspi/lean-cpi | 81480a13842d67ff5f3698643210d8ed5dd08de4 | 443bf2cb236feadc45a01387099c236ab2b78237 | refs/heads/master | 1,650,307,316,582 | 1,587,033,364,000 | 1,587,033,364,000 | 207,499,661 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 595 | lean | namespace tactic
open well_founded_tactics
/-- `fst_dec_tac`, but without the `abstract` (and thus zeta reducing). -/
meta def fst_dec_tac' : tactic unit := do
clear_internals,
unfold_wf_rel,
process_lex (unfold_sizeof >> try (tactic.dunfold_target [``psigma.fst])
>> cancel_nat_add_lt >> trivial_nat_lt)
/-- An alternative version of `dec_tac` which also unfolds .fst indexing.
This is required for the various proofs which skip the implicit context
argument. -/
meta def fst_dec_tac : tactic unit := abstract fst_dec_tac'
end tactic
|
bbdb6da9fe9b27960bde0a78eece1d4f260d56ee | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/linear_algebra/projection_auto.lean | 789081aa54a8f6d1a8cbf5f8f2999a3d99053a97 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,539 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.linear_algebra.basic
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2 u_3 u_4
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Projection to a subspace
In this file we define
* `linear_proj_of_is_compl (p q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)`: the projection of a module `E`
to a submodule `p` along its complement `q`; it is the unique linear map `f : E → p` such that
`f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`.
* `is_compl_equiv_proj p`: equivalence between submodules `q` such that `is_compl p q` and
projections `f : E → p`, `∀ x ∈ p, f x = x`.
We also provide some lemmas justifying correctness of our definitions.
## Tags
projection, complement subspace
-/
namespace linear_map
theorem ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E] [module R E]
{p : submodule R E} {f : linear_map R E ↥p} (hf : ∀ (x : ↥p), coe_fn f ↑x = x) :
ker (id - comp (submodule.subtype p) f) = p :=
sorry
theorem range_eq_of_proj {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E] [module R E]
{p : submodule R E} {f : linear_map R E ↥p} (hf : ∀ (x : ↥p), coe_fn f ↑x = x) : range f = ⊤ :=
iff.mpr range_eq_top fun (x : ↥p) => Exists.intro (↑x) (hf x)
theorem is_compl_of_proj {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E] [module R E]
{p : submodule R E} {f : linear_map R E ↥p} (hf : ∀ (x : ↥p), coe_fn f ↑x = x) :
is_compl p (ker f) :=
sorry
end linear_map
namespace submodule
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `M/p ≃ q`. -/
def quotient_equiv_of_is_compl {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E]
[module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q) :
linear_equiv R (quotient p) ↥q :=
linear_equiv.symm
(linear_equiv.of_bijective (linear_map.comp (mkq p) (submodule.subtype q)) sorry sorry)
@[simp] theorem quotient_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
(x : ↥q) : coe_fn (linear_equiv.symm (quotient_equiv_of_is_compl p q h)) x = quotient.mk ↑x :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem quotient_equiv_of_is_compl_apply_mk_coe {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
(x : ↥q) : coe_fn (quotient_equiv_of_is_compl p q h) (quotient.mk ↑x) = x :=
linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply (quotient_equiv_of_is_compl p q h) x
@[simp] theorem mk_quotient_equiv_of_is_compl_apply {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
(x : quotient p) : quotient.mk ↑(coe_fn (quotient_equiv_of_is_compl p q h) x) = x :=
linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply (quotient_equiv_of_is_compl p q h) x
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `p × q` is isomorphic to `E`. It is the unique
linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`. -/
def prod_equiv_of_is_compl {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E] [module R E]
(p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q) : linear_equiv R (↥p × ↥q) E :=
linear_equiv.of_bijective (linear_map.coprod (submodule.subtype p) (submodule.subtype q)) sorry
sorry
@[simp] theorem coe_prod_equiv_of_is_compl {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E]
[module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q) :
↑(prod_equiv_of_is_compl p q h) =
linear_map.coprod (submodule.subtype p) (submodule.subtype q) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_prod_equiv_of_is_compl' {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
(x : ↥p × ↥q) : coe_fn (prod_equiv_of_is_compl p q h) x = ↑(prod.fst x) + ↑(prod.snd x) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_left {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
(x : ↥p) : coe_fn (linear_equiv.symm (prod_equiv_of_is_compl p q h)) ↑x = (x, 0) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_right {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
(x : ↥q) : coe_fn (linear_equiv.symm (prod_equiv_of_is_compl p q h)) ↑x = (0, x) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
{x : E} : prod.fst (coe_fn (linear_equiv.symm (prod_equiv_of_is_compl p q h)) x) = 0 ↔ x ∈ q :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q)
{x : E} : prod.snd (coe_fn (linear_equiv.symm (prod_equiv_of_is_compl p q h)) x) = 0 ↔ x ∈ p :=
sorry
/-- Projection to a submodule along its complement. -/
def linear_proj_of_is_compl {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E] [module R E]
(p : submodule R E) (q : submodule R E) (h : is_compl p q) : linear_map R E ↥p :=
linear_map.comp (linear_map.fst R ↥p ↥q) ↑(linear_equiv.symm (prod_equiv_of_is_compl p q h))
@[simp] theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_left {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q)
(x : ↥p) : coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) ↑x = x :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_range {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q) :
linear_map.range (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) = ⊤ :=
linear_map.range_eq_of_proj (linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_left h)
@[simp] theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_eq_zero_iff {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q)
{x : E} : coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) x = 0 ↔ x ∈ q :=
sorry
theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_right' {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q)
(x : E) (hx : x ∈ q) : coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) x = 0 :=
iff.mpr (linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_eq_zero_iff h) hx
@[simp] theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_right {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q)
(x : ↥q) : coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) ↑x = 0 :=
linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_right' h (↑x) (subtype.property x)
@[simp] theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_ker {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q) :
linear_map.ker (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) = q :=
ext fun (x : E) => iff.trans linear_map.mem_ker (linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_eq_zero_iff h)
theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_comp_subtype {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q) :
linear_map.comp (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) (submodule.subtype p) = linear_map.id :=
linear_map.ext (linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_left h)
theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_idempotent {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E]
[module R E] {p : submodule R E} {q : submodule R E} (h : is_compl p q) (x : E) :
coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) ↑(coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) x) =
coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) x :=
linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_left h (coe_fn (linear_proj_of_is_compl p q h) x)
end submodule
namespace linear_map
@[simp] theorem linear_proj_of_is_compl_of_proj {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {p : submodule R E} (f : linear_map R E ↥p)
(hf : ∀ (x : ↥p), coe_fn f ↑x = x) :
submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl p (ker f) (is_compl_of_proj hf) = f :=
sorry
/-- If `f : E →ₗ[R] F` and `g : E →ₗ[R] G` are two surjective linear maps and
their kernels are complement of each other, then `x ↦ (f x, g x)` defines
a linear equivalence `E ≃ₗ[R] F × G`. -/
def equiv_prod_of_surjective_of_is_compl {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E]
[module R E] {F : Type u_3} [add_comm_group F] [module R F] {G : Type u_4} [add_comm_group G]
[module R G] (f : linear_map R E F) (g : linear_map R E G) (hf : range f = ⊤) (hg : range g = ⊤)
(hfg : is_compl (ker f) (ker g)) : linear_equiv R E (F × G) :=
linear_equiv.of_bijective (prod f g) sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem coe_equiv_prod_of_surjective_of_is_compl {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {F : Type u_3} [add_comm_group F] [module R F] {G : Type u_4}
[add_comm_group G] [module R G] {f : linear_map R E F} {g : linear_map R E G} (hf : range f = ⊤)
(hg : range g = ⊤) (hfg : is_compl (ker f) (ker g)) :
↑(equiv_prod_of_surjective_of_is_compl f g hf hg hfg) = prod f g :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem equiv_prod_of_surjective_of_is_compl_apply {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] {F : Type u_3} [add_comm_group F] [module R F] {G : Type u_4}
[add_comm_group G] [module R G] {f : linear_map R E F} {g : linear_map R E G} (hf : range f = ⊤)
(hg : range g = ⊤) (hfg : is_compl (ker f) (ker g)) (x : E) :
coe_fn (equiv_prod_of_surjective_of_is_compl f g hf hg hfg) x = (coe_fn f x, coe_fn g x) :=
rfl
end linear_map
namespace submodule
/-- Equivalence between submodules `q` such that `is_compl p q` and linear maps `f : E →ₗ[R] p`
such that `∀ x : p, f x = x`. -/
def is_compl_equiv_proj {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2} [add_comm_group E] [module R E]
(p : submodule R E) :
(Subtype fun (q : submodule R E) => is_compl p q) ≃
Subtype fun (f : linear_map R E ↥p) => ∀ (x : ↥p), coe_fn f ↑x = x :=
equiv.mk
(fun (q : Subtype fun (q : submodule R E) => is_compl p q) =>
{ val := linear_proj_of_is_compl p ↑q sorry, property := sorry })
(fun (f : Subtype fun (f : linear_map R E ↥p) => ∀ (x : ↥p), coe_fn f ↑x = x) =>
{ val := linear_map.ker ↑f, property := sorry })
sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem coe_is_compl_equiv_proj_apply {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E)
(q : Subtype fun (q : submodule R E) => is_compl p q) :
↑(coe_fn (is_compl_equiv_proj p) q) = linear_proj_of_is_compl p (↑q) (subtype.property q) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_is_compl_equiv_proj_symm_apply {R : Type u_1} [ring R] {E : Type u_2}
[add_comm_group E] [module R E] (p : submodule R E)
(f : Subtype fun (f : linear_map R E ↥p) => ∀ (x : ↥p), coe_fn f ↑x = x) :
↑(coe_fn (equiv.symm (is_compl_equiv_proj p)) f) = linear_map.ker ↑f :=
rfl
end Mathlib |
5ab9f377bb438dff9dc424c6a433318dd1692850 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/analysis/special_functions/trigonometric/bounds.lean | a781e5dd416f6538ae9e70df3ab68814bd0fe3a6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,431 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.basic
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.deriv
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.arctan_deriv
/-!
# Polynomial bounds for trigonometric functions
## Main statements
This file contains upper and lower bounds for real trigonometric functions in terms
of polynomials. See `trigonometric.basic` for more elementary inequalities, establishing
the ranges of these functions, and their monotonicity in suitable intervals.
Here we prove the following:
* `sin_lt`: for `x > 0` we have `sin x < x`.
* `sin_gt_sub_cube`: For `0 < x ≤ 1` we have `x - x ^ 3 / 4 < sin x`.
* `lt_tan`: for `0 < x < π/2` we have `x < tan x`.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable theory
open set
namespace real
open_locale real
/-- For 0 < x, we have sin x < x. -/
lemma sin_lt {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) : sin x < x :=
begin
cases lt_or_le 1 x with h' h',
{ exact (sin_le_one x).trans_lt h' },
have hx : |x| = x := abs_of_nonneg h.le,
have := le_of_abs_le (sin_bound $ show |x| ≤ 1, by rwa [hx]),
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', hx] at this,
apply this.trans_lt,
rw [sub_add, sub_lt_self_iff, sub_pos, div_eq_mul_inv (x ^ 3)],
refine mul_lt_mul' _ (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (pow_pos h 3),
apply pow_le_pow_of_le_one h.le h',
norm_num
end
/-- For 0 < x ≤ 1 we have x - x ^ 3 / 4 < sin x.
This is also true for x > 1, but it's nontrivial for x just above 1. This inequality is not
tight; the tighter inequality is sin x > x - x ^ 3 / 6 for all x > 0, but this inequality has
a simpler proof. -/
lemma sin_gt_sub_cube {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (h' : x ≤ 1) : x - x ^ 3 / 4 < sin x :=
begin
have hx : |x| = x := abs_of_nonneg h.le,
have := neg_le_of_abs_le (sin_bound $ show |x| ≤ 1, by rwa [hx]),
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, hx] at this,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ this,
have : x ^ 3 / 4 - x ^ 3 / 6 = x ^ 3 * 12⁻¹ := by norm_num [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_sub],
rw [add_comm, sub_add, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_lt_sub_iff_left, ←lt_sub_iff_add_lt', this],
refine mul_lt_mul' _ (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (pow_pos h 3),
apply pow_le_pow_of_le_one h.le h',
norm_num
end
/-- The derivative of `tan x - x` is `1/(cos x)^2 - 1` away from the zeroes of cos. -/
lemma deriv_tan_sub_id (x : ℝ) (h : cos x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λ y : ℝ, tan y - y) x = 1 / cos x ^ 2 - 1 :=
has_deriv_at.deriv $ by simpa using (has_deriv_at_tan h).add (has_deriv_at_id x).neg
/-- For all `0 ≤ x < π/2` we have `x < tan x`.
This is proved by checking that the function `tan x - x` vanishes
at zero and has non-negative derivative. -/
theorem lt_tan (x : ℝ) (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x < π / 2) : x < tan x :=
begin
let U := Ico 0 (π / 2),
have intU : interior U = Ioo 0 (π / 2) := interior_Ico,
have half_pi_pos : 0 < π / 2 := div_pos pi_pos two_pos,
have cos_pos : ∀ {y : ℝ}, y ∈ U → 0 < cos y,
{ intros y hy,
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo (Ico_subset_Ioo_left (neg_lt_zero.mpr half_pi_pos) hy) },
have sin_pos : ∀ {y : ℝ}, y ∈ interior U → 0 < sin y,
{ intros y hy,
rw intU at hy,
exact sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo (Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (div_le_self pi_pos.le one_le_two) hy) },
have tan_cts_U : continuous_on tan U,
{ apply continuous_on.mono continuous_on_tan,
intros z hz,
simp only [mem_set_of_eq],
exact (cos_pos hz).ne' },
have tan_minus_id_cts : continuous_on (λ y : ℝ, tan y - y) U :=
tan_cts_U.sub continuous_on_id,
have deriv_pos : ∀ y : ℝ, y ∈ interior U → 0 < deriv (λ y' : ℝ, tan y' - y') y,
{ intros y hy,
have := cos_pos (interior_subset hy),
simp only [deriv_tan_sub_id y this.ne', one_div, gt_iff_lt, sub_pos],
have bd2 : cos y ^ 2 < 1,
{ apply lt_of_le_of_ne y.cos_sq_le_one,
rw cos_sq',
simpa only [ne.def, sub_eq_self, pow_eq_zero_iff, nat.succ_pos']
using (sin_pos hy).ne' },
rwa [lt_inv, inv_one],
{ exact zero_lt_one },
simpa only [sq, mul_self_pos] using this.ne' },
have mono := convex.strict_mono_on_of_deriv_pos (convex_Ico 0 (π / 2)) tan_minus_id_cts deriv_pos,
have zero_in_U : (0 : ℝ) ∈ U,
{ rwa left_mem_Ico },
have x_in_U : x ∈ U := ⟨h1.le, h2⟩,
simpa only [tan_zero, sub_zero, sub_pos] using mono zero_in_U x_in_U h1
end
end real
|
5f1cbbc68db53d00166f430e321de025b1d91817 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/group_theory/schur_zassenhaus.lean | d7523f51d3821e51be09470eaa224fd8f64fa67f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,736 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import group_theory.complement
import group_theory.index
/-!
# Complements
In this file we prove the Schur-Zassenhaus theorem for abelian normal subgroups.
## Main results
- `exists_right_complement_of_coprime` : **Schur-Zassenhaus** for abelian normal subgroups:
If `H : subgroup G` is abelian, normal, and has order coprime to its index, then there exists
a subgroup `K` which is a (right) complement of `H`.
- `exists_left_complement_of_coprime` : **Schur-Zassenhaus** for abelian normal subgroups:
If `H : subgroup G` is abelian, normal, and has order coprime to its index, then there exists
a subgroup `K` which is a (left) complement of `H`.
-/
open_locale big_operators
namespace subgroup
variables {G : Type*} [group G] {H : subgroup G}
@[to_additive] instance : mul_action G (left_transversals (H : set G)) :=
{ smul := λ g T, ⟨left_coset g T, mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_inv_mul_mem.mpr (λ g', by
{ obtain ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_inv_mul_mem.mp T.2 (g⁻¹ * g'),
simp_rw [←mul_assoc, ←mul_inv_rev] at ht1 ht2,
refine ⟨⟨g * t, mem_left_coset g t.2⟩, ht1, _⟩,
rintros ⟨_, t', ht', rfl⟩ h,
exact subtype.ext ((mul_right_inj g).mpr (subtype.ext_iff.mp (ht2 ⟨t', ht'⟩ h))) })⟩,
one_smul := λ T, subtype.ext (one_left_coset T),
mul_smul := λ g g' T, subtype.ext (left_coset_assoc ↑T g g').symm }
lemma smul_symm_apply_eq_mul_symm_apply_inv_smul
(g : G) (α : left_transversals (H : set G)) (q : quotient_group.quotient H) :
↑((equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp (g • α).2)).symm q) =
g * ((equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp α.2)).symm
(g⁻¹ • q : quotient_group.quotient H)) :=
begin
let w := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp α.2)),
let y := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp (g • α).2)),
change ↑(y.symm q) = ↑(⟨_, mem_left_coset g (subtype.mem _)⟩ : (g • α).1),
refine subtype.ext_iff.mp (y.symm_apply_eq.mpr _),
change q = g • (w (w.symm (g⁻¹ • q : quotient_group.quotient H))),
rw [equiv.apply_symm_apply, ←mul_smul, mul_inv_self, one_smul],
end
variables [is_commutative H] [fintype (quotient_group.quotient H)]
variables (α β γ : left_transversals (H : set G))
/-- The difference of two left transversals -/
@[to_additive "The difference of two left transversals"]
noncomputable def diff [hH : normal H] : H :=
let α' := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp α.2)).symm,
β' := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp β.2)).symm in
∏ (q : quotient_group.quotient H), ⟨(α' q) * (β' q)⁻¹,
hH.mem_comm (quotient.exact' ((β'.symm_apply_apply q).trans (α'.symm_apply_apply q).symm))⟩
@[to_additive] lemma diff_mul_diff [normal H] : diff α β * diff β γ = diff α γ :=
finset.prod_mul_distrib.symm.trans (finset.prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, subtype.ext
(by rw [coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, coe_mk, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left])))
@[to_additive] lemma diff_self [normal H] : diff α α = 1 :=
mul_right_eq_self.mp (diff_mul_diff α α α)
@[to_additive] lemma diff_inv [normal H]: (diff α β)⁻¹ = diff β α :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one ((diff_mul_diff α β α).trans (diff_self α))
lemma smul_diff_smul [hH : normal H] (g : G) :
diff (g • α) (g • β) = ⟨g * diff α β * g⁻¹, hH.conj_mem (diff α β).1 (diff α β).2 g⟩ :=
begin
let ϕ : H →* H :=
{ to_fun := λ h, ⟨g * h * g⁻¹, hH.conj_mem h.1 h.2 g⟩,
map_one' := subtype.ext (by rw [coe_mk, coe_one, mul_one, mul_inv_self]),
map_mul' := λ h₁ h₂, subtype.ext (by rw [coe_mk, coe_mul, coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, mul_assoc,
mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left]) },
refine eq.trans (finset.prod_bij' (λ q _, (↑g)⁻¹ * q) (λ _ _, finset.mem_univ _)
(λ q _, subtype.ext _) (λ q _, ↑g * q) (λ _ _, finset.mem_univ _)
(λ q _, mul_inv_cancel_left g q) (λ q _, inv_mul_cancel_left g q)) (ϕ.map_prod _ _).symm,
change _ * _ = g * (_ * _) * g⁻¹,
simp_rw [smul_symm_apply_eq_mul_symm_apply_inv_smul, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc],
refl,
end
lemma smul_diff [H.normal] (h : H) :
diff (h • α) β = h ^ H.index * diff α β :=
begin
rw [diff, diff, index_eq_card, ←finset.card_univ, ←finset.prod_const, ←finset.prod_mul_distrib],
refine finset.prod_congr rfl (λ q _, _),
rw [subtype.ext_iff, coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, ←mul_assoc, mul_right_cancel_iff],
rw [show h • α = (h : G) • α, from rfl, smul_symm_apply_eq_mul_symm_apply_inv_smul],
rw [mul_left_cancel_iff, ←subtype.ext_iff, equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq, inv_smul_eq_iff],
exact self_eq_mul_left.mpr ((quotient_group.eq_one_iff _).mpr h.2),
end
variables (H)
instance setoid_diff [H.normal] : setoid (left_transversals (H : set G)) :=
setoid.mk (λ α β, diff α β = 1) ⟨λ α, diff_self α, λ α β h₁,
by rw [←diff_inv, h₁, one_inv], λ α β γ h₁ h₂, by rw [←diff_mul_diff, h₁, h₂, one_mul]⟩
/-- The quotient of the transversals of an abelian normal `N` by the `diff` relation -/
def quotient_diff [H.normal] :=
quotient H.setoid_diff
instance [H.normal] : inhabited H.quotient_diff :=
quotient.inhabited
variables {H}
instance [H.normal] : mul_action G H.quotient_diff :=
{ smul := λ g, quotient.map (λ α, g • α) (λ α β h, (smul_diff_smul α β g).trans
(subtype.ext (mul_inv_eq_one.mpr (mul_right_eq_self.mpr (subtype.ext_iff.mp h))))),
mul_smul := λ g₁ g₂ q, quotient.induction_on q (λ α, congr_arg quotient.mk (mul_smul g₁ g₂ α)),
one_smul := λ q, quotient.induction_on q (λ α, congr_arg quotient.mk (one_smul G α)) }
variables [fintype H]
lemma exists_smul_eq [H.normal] (α β : H.quotient_diff)
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) H.index) :
∃ h : H, h • α = β :=
quotient.induction_on α (quotient.induction_on β
(λ β α, exists_imp_exists (λ n, quotient.sound)
⟨(pow_coprime hH).symm (diff α β)⁻¹, by
{ change diff ((_ : H) • _) _ = 1,
rw smul_diff,
change pow_coprime hH ((pow_coprime hH).symm (diff α β)⁻¹) * (diff α β) = 1,
rw [equiv.apply_symm_apply, inv_mul_self] }⟩))
lemma smul_left_injective [H.normal] (α : H.quotient_diff)
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) H.index) :
function.injective (λ h : H, h • α) :=
λ h₁ h₂, begin
refine quotient.induction_on α (λ α hα, _),
replace hα : diff (h₁ • α) (h₂ • α) = 1 := quotient.exact hα,
rw [smul_diff, ←diff_inv, smul_diff, diff_self, mul_one, mul_inv_eq_one] at hα,
exact (pow_coprime hH).injective hα,
end
lemma is_complement'_stabilizer_of_coprime [fintype G] [H.normal] {α : H.quotient_diff}
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) H.index) :
is_complement' H (mul_action.stabilizer G α) :=
begin
classical,
let ϕ : H ≃ mul_action.orbit G α := equiv.of_bijective (λ h, ⟨h • α, h, rfl⟩)
⟨λ h₁ h₂ hh, smul_left_injective α hH (subtype.ext_iff.mp hh),
λ β, exists_imp_exists (λ h hh, subtype.ext hh) (exists_smul_eq α β hH)⟩,
have key := card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup (mul_action.stabilizer G α),
rw ← fintype.card_congr (ϕ.trans (mul_action.orbit_equiv_quotient_stabilizer G α)) at key,
apply is_complement'_of_coprime key.symm,
rw [card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup H, mul_comm, mul_right_inj'] at key,
{ rwa [←key, ←index_eq_card] },
{ rw [←pos_iff_ne_zero, fintype.card_pos_iff],
apply_instance },
end
/-- **Schur-Zassenhaus** for abelian normal subgroups:
If `H : subgroup G` is abelian, normal, and has order coprime to its index, then there exists
a subgroup `K` which is a (right) complement of `H`. -/
theorem exists_right_complement'_of_coprime [fintype G] [H.normal]
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) H.index) :
∃ K : subgroup G, is_complement' H K :=
nonempty_of_inhabited.elim
(λ α : H.quotient_diff, ⟨mul_action.stabilizer G α, is_complement'_stabilizer_of_coprime hH⟩)
/-- **Schur-Zassenhaus** for abelian normal subgroups:
If `H : subgroup G` is abelian, normal, and has order coprime to its index, then there exists
a subgroup `K` which is a (left) complement of `H`. -/
theorem exists_left_complement'_of_coprime [fintype G] [H.normal]
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) H.index) :
∃ K : subgroup G, is_complement' K H :=
Exists.imp (λ _, is_complement'.symm) (exists_right_complement'_of_coprime hH)
end subgroup
|
7bd58453d1e4dfbad14db0fcf91fd6abb4eabf9b | 271e26e338b0c14544a889c31c30b39c989f2e0f | /src/Init/Data/List/Control.lean | fb9e329f358d4e02577185fc5c9d6202dcdd98a1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dgorokho/lean4 | 805f99b0b60c545b64ac34ab8237a8504f89d7d4 | e949a052bad59b1c7b54a82d24d516a656487d8a | refs/heads/master | 1,607,061,363,851 | 1,578,006,086,000 | 1,578,006,086,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,185 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Monad
import Init.Control.Alternative
import Init.Data.List.Basic
namespace List
universes u v w u₁ u₂
/-
Remark: we can define `mapM`, `mapM₂` and `forM` using `Applicative` instead of `Monad`.
Example:
```
def mapM {m : Type u → Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : List α → m (List β)
| [] => pure []
| a::as => List.cons <$> (f a) <*> mapM as
```
However, we consider `f <$> a <*> b` an anti-idiom because the generated code
may produce unnecessary closure allocations.
Suppose `m` is a `Monad`, and it uses the default implementation for `Applicative.seq`.
Then, the compiler expands `f <$> a <*> b <*> c` into something equivalent to
```
(Functor.map f a >>= fun g_1 => Functor.map g_1 b) >>= fun g_2 => Functor.map g_2 c
```
In an ideal world, the compiler may eliminate the temporary closures `g_1` and `g_2` after it inlines
`Functor.map` and `Monad.bind`. However, this can easily fail. For example, suppose
`Functor.map f a >>= fun g_1 => Functor.map g_1 b` expanded into a match-expression.
This is not unreasonable and can happen in many different ways, e.g., we are using a monad that
may throw exceptions. Then, the compiler has to decide whether it will create a join-point for
the continuation of the match or float it. If the compiler decides to float, then it will
be able to eliminate the closures, but it may not be feasible since floating match expressions
may produce exponential blowup in the code size.
Finally, we rarely use `mapM` with something that is not a `Monad`.
Users that want to use `mapM` with `Applicative` should use `mapA` instead.
-/
@[specialize]
def mapM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : List α → m (List β)
| [] => pure []
| a::as => do b ← f a; bs ← mapM as; pure (b :: bs)
@[specialize]
def mapM₂ {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type u₁} {β : Type u₂} {γ : Type u} (f : α → β → m γ) : List α → List β → m (List γ)
| a::as, b::bs => do c ← f a b; cs ← mapM₂ as bs; pure (c :: cs)
| _, _ => pure []
@[specialize]
def mapA {m : Type u → Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : List α → m (List β)
| [] => pure []
| a::as => List.cons <$> f a <*> mapA as
@[specialize]
def mapA₂ {m : Type u → Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type u₁} {β : Type u₂} {γ : Type u} (f : α → β → m γ) : List α → List β → m (List γ)
| a::as, b::bs => List.cons <$> f a b <*> mapA₂ as bs
| _, _ => pure []
@[specialize]
def forM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : List α → m PUnit
| [] => pure ⟨⟩
| h :: t => do f h; forM t
@[specialize]
def forM₂ {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type u₁} {β : Type u₂} {γ : Type u} (f : α → β → m γ) : List α → List β → m PUnit
| a::as, b::bs => do f a b; forM₂ as bs
| _, _ => pure ⟨⟩
@[specialize]
def forA {m : Type u → Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : List α → m PUnit
| [] => pure ⟨⟩
| h :: t => f h *> forA t
@[specialize]
def forA₂ {m : Type u → Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type u₁} {β : Type u₂} {γ : Type u} (f : α → β → m γ) : List α → List β → m PUnit
| a::as, b::bs => f a b *> forA₂ as bs
| _, _ => pure ⟨⟩
@[specialize]
def filterAuxM {m : Type → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α → m Bool) : List α → List α → m (List α)
| [], acc => pure acc
| h :: t, acc => do b ← f h; filterAuxM t (cond b (h :: acc) acc)
@[inline]
def filterM {m : Type → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α → m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) :=
do as ← filterAuxM f as []; pure as.reverse
@[inline]
def filterRevM {m : Type → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α → m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) :=
filterAuxM f as.reverse []
@[specialize]
def foldlM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w} : (s → α → m s) → s → List α → m s
| f, s, [] => pure s
| f, s, h :: r => do
s' ← f s h;
foldlM f s' r
@[specialize]
def foldrM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w} : (α → s → m s) → s → List α → m s
| f, s, [] => pure s
| f, s, h :: r => do
s' ← foldrM f s r;
f h s'
@[specialize]
def firstM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] [Alternative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : List α → m β
| [] => failure
| a::as => f a <|> firstM as
@[specialize]
def anyM {m : Type → Type u} [Monad m] {α : Type v} (f : α → m Bool) : List α → m Bool
| [] => pure false
| a::as => do b ← f a; match b with
| true => pure true
| false => anyM as
@[specialize]
def allM {m : Type → Type u} [Monad m] {α : Type v} (f : α → m Bool) : List α → m Bool
| [] => pure true
| a::as => do b ← f a; match b with
| true => allM as
| false => pure false
end List
|
bb407b7dc9139f61dd6042b1f7e3aa098e58356f | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/measure_theory/lp_space.lean | 3475758e81576870e5264ddb716ed1ab7442e3fd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 97,621 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.normed_space.indicator_function
import analysis.normed_space.normed_group_hom
import measure_theory.ess_sup
import measure_theory.ae_eq_fun
import measure_theory.mean_inequalities
import topology.continuous_function.compact
/-!
# ℒp space and Lp space
This file describes properties of almost everywhere measurable functions with finite seminorm,
denoted by `snorm f p μ` and defined for `p:ℝ≥0∞` as `0` if `p=0`, `(∫ ∥f a∥^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for
`0 < p < ∞` and `ess_sup ∥f∥ μ` for `p=∞`.
The Prop-valued `mem_ℒp f p μ` states that a function `f : α → E` has finite seminorm.
The space `Lp E p μ` is the subtype of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun) such that
`snorm f p μ` is finite. For `1 ≤ p`, `snorm` defines a norm and `Lp` is a complete metric space.
## Main definitions
* `snorm' f p μ` : `(∫ ∥f a∥^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `f : α → F` and `p : ℝ`, where `α` is a measurable
space and `F` is a normed group.
* `snorm_ess_sup f μ` : seminorm in `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum `ess_sup ∥f∥ μ`.
* `snorm f p μ` : for `p : ℝ≥0∞`, seminorm in `ℒp`, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `snorm' f p μ`
for `0 < p < ∞` and to `snorm_ess_sup f μ` for `p = ∞`.
* `mem_ℒp f p μ` : property that the function `f` is almost everywhere measurable and has finite
p-seminorm for measure `μ` (`snorm f p μ < ∞`)
* `Lp E p μ` : elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun) such that `snorm f p μ` is finite. Defined
as an `add_subgroup` of `α →ₘ[μ] E`.
Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `Lp`. We define this action, and prove
that it is continuous. In particular,
* `continuous_linear_map.comp_Lp` defines the action on `Lp` of a continuous linear map.
* `Lp.pos_part` is the positive part of an `Lp` function.
* `Lp.neg_part` is the negative part of an `Lp` function.
When `α` is a topological space equipped with a finite Borel measure, there is a bounded linear map
from the normed space of bounded continuous functions (`α →ᵇ E`) to `Lp E p μ`. We construct this
as `bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp`.
## Notations
* `α →₁[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 1 μ`.
* `α →₂[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 2 μ`.
## Implementation
Since `Lp` is defined as an `add_subgroup`, dot notation does not work. Use `Lp.measurable f` to
say that the coercion of `f` to a genuine function is measurable, instead of the non-working
`f.measurable`.
To prove that two `Lp` elements are equal, it suffices to show that their coercions to functions
coincide almost everywhere (this is registered as an `ext` rule). This can often be done using
`filter_upwards`. For instance, a proof from first principles that `f + (g + h) = (f + g) + h`
could read (in the `Lp` namespace)
```
example (f g h : Lp E p μ) : (f + g) + h = f + (g + h) :=
begin
ext1,
filter_upwards [coe_fn_add (f + g) h, coe_fn_add f g, coe_fn_add f (g + h), coe_fn_add g h],
assume a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4,
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, add_assoc],
end
```
The lemma `coe_fn_add` states that the coercion of `f + g` coincides almost everywhere with the sum
of the coercions of `f` and `g`. All such lemmas use `coe_fn` in their name, to distinguish the
function coercion from the coercion to almost everywhere defined functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open topological_space measure_theory filter
open_locale nnreal ennreal big_operators topological_space
lemma fact_one_le_one_ennreal : fact ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 1) := ⟨le_refl _⟩
lemma fact_one_le_two_ennreal : fact ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 2) :=
⟨ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (show (1 : ℝ≥0) ≤ 2, by norm_num)⟩
lemma fact_one_le_top_ennreal : fact ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∞) := ⟨le_top⟩
local attribute [instance] fact_one_le_one_ennreal fact_one_le_two_ennreal fact_one_le_top_ennreal
variables {α E F G : Type*} [measurable_space α] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ : measure α}
[measurable_space E] [normed_group E]
[normed_group F] [normed_group G]
namespace measure_theory
section ℒp
/-!
### ℒp seminorm
We define the ℒp seminorm, denoted by `snorm f p μ`. For real `p`, it is given by an integral
formula (for which we use the notation `snorm' f p μ`), and for `p = ∞` it is the essential
supremum (for which we use the notation `snorm_ess_sup f μ`).
We also define a predicate `mem_ℒp f p μ`, requesting that a function is almost everywhere
measurable and has finite `snorm f p μ`.
This paragraph is devoted to the basic properties of these definitions. It is constructed as
follows: for a given property, we prove it for `snorm'` and `snorm_ess_sup` when it makes sense,
deduce it for `snorm`, and translate it in terms of `mem_ℒp`.
-/
section ℒp_space_definition
/-- `(∫ ∥f a∥^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)`, which is a seminorm on the space of measurable functions for which
this quantity is finite -/
def snorm' (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ := (∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a))^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)
/-- seminorm for `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum of `∥f∥`. -/
def snorm_ess_sup (f : α → F) (μ : measure α) := ess_sup (λ x, (nnnorm (f x) : ℝ≥0∞)) μ
/-- `ℒp` seminorm, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `(∫ ∥f a∥^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `0 < p < ∞` and to
`ess_sup ∥f∥ μ` for `p = ∞`. -/
def snorm (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
if p = 0 then 0 else (if p = ∞ then snorm_ess_sup f μ else snorm' f (ennreal.to_real p) μ)
lemma snorm_eq_snorm' (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = snorm' f (ennreal.to_real p) μ :=
by simp [snorm, hp_ne_zero, hp_ne_top]
lemma snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = (∫⁻ x, (nnnorm (f x)) ^ p.to_real ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
by rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, snorm']
lemma snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {f : α → F} : snorm f 1 μ = ∫⁻ x, nnnorm (f x) ∂μ :=
by simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm one_ne_zero ennreal.coe_ne_top, ennreal.one_to_real,
one_div_one, ennreal.rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma snorm_exponent_top {f : α → F} : snorm f ∞ μ = snorm_ess_sup f μ := by simp [snorm]
/-- The property that `f:α→E` is ae_measurable and `(∫ ∥f a∥^p ∂μ)^(1/p)` is finite if `p < ∞`, or
`ess_sup f < ∞` if `p = ∞`. -/
def mem_ℒp (f : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
ae_measurable f μ ∧ snorm f p μ < ∞
lemma mem_ℒp.ae_measurable {f : α → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {μ : measure α} (h : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
ae_measurable f μ := h.1
lemma lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q) :
∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ = (snorm' f q μ) ^ q :=
begin
rw [snorm', ←ennreal.rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel, ennreal.rpow_one],
exact (ne_of_lt hq0_lt).symm,
end
end ℒp_space_definition
section top
lemma mem_ℒp.snorm_lt_top {f : α → E} (hfp : mem_ℒp f p μ) : snorm f p μ < ∞ := hfp.2
lemma mem_ℒp.snorm_ne_top {f : α → E} (hfp : mem_ℒp f p μ) : snorm f p μ ≠ ∞ := ne_of_lt (hfp.2)
lemma lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : snorm' f q μ < ∞) :
∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ < ∞ :=
begin
rw lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' hq0_lt,
exact ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq),
end
lemma lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top {f : α → F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : snorm f p μ < ∞) :
∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a)) ^ p.to_real ∂μ < ∞ :=
begin
apply lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top,
{ exact ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hp_ne_zero, hp_ne_top⟩ },
{ simpa [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp }
end
lemma snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top {f : α → F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a)) ^ p.to_real ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top,
begin
intros h,
have hp' := ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hp_ne_zero, hp_ne_top⟩,
have : 0 < 1 / p.to_real := div_pos zero_lt_one hp',
simpa [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)
end⟩
end top
section zero
@[simp] lemma snorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm' f 0 μ = 1 :=
by rw [snorm', div_zero, ennreal.rpow_zero]
@[simp] lemma snorm_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm f 0 μ = 0 :=
by simp [snorm]
lemma mem_ℒp_zero_iff_ae_measurable {f : α → E} : mem_ℒp f 0 μ ↔ ae_measurable f μ :=
by simp [mem_ℒp, snorm_exponent_zero]
@[simp] lemma snorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : snorm' (0 : α → F) q μ = 0 :=
by simp [snorm', hp0_lt]
@[simp] lemma snorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : snorm' (0 : α → F) q μ = 0 :=
begin
cases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 hq_neg,
{ exact snorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm), },
{ simp [snorm', ennreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg], },
end
@[simp] lemma snorm_ess_sup_zero : snorm_ess_sup (0 : α → F) μ = 0 :=
begin
simp_rw [snorm_ess_sup, pi.zero_apply, nnnorm_zero, ennreal.coe_zero, ←ennreal.bot_eq_zero],
exact ess_sup_const_bot,
end
@[simp] lemma snorm_zero : snorm (0 : α → F) p μ = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ simp only [h_top, snorm_exponent_top, snorm_ess_sup_zero], },
rw ←ne.def at h0,
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top,
ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h0.symm, h_top⟩],
end
lemma zero_mem_ℒp : mem_ℒp (0 : α → E) p μ :=
⟨measurable_zero.ae_measurable, by { rw snorm_zero, exact ennreal.coe_lt_top, } ⟩
lemma snorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → F} (hq_pos : 0 < q) : snorm' f q 0 = 0 :=
by simp [snorm', hq_pos]
lemma snorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm' f 0 0 = 1 := by simp [snorm']
lemma snorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → F} (hq_neg : q < 0) : snorm' f q 0 = ∞ :=
by simp [snorm', hq_neg]
@[simp] lemma snorm_ess_sup_measure_zero {f : α → F} : snorm_ess_sup f 0 = 0 :=
by simp [snorm_ess_sup]
@[simp] lemma snorm_measure_zero {f : α → F} : snorm f p 0 = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [h_top], },
rw ←ne.def at h0,
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm',
ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h0.symm, h_top⟩],
end
end zero
section const
lemma snorm'_const (c : F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (λ x : α , c) q μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
rw [snorm', lintegral_const, ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)],
congr,
rw ←ennreal.rpow_mul,
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1/q) = 1, by rw [hq_cancel, ennreal.rpow_one],
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm],
end
lemma snorm'_const' [finite_measure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
snorm' (λ x : α , c) q μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
rw [snorm', lintegral_const, ennreal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ set.univ)],
{ congr,
rw ←ennreal.rpow_mul,
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1/q) = 1, by rw [hp_cancel, ennreal.rpow_one],
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel hq_ne_zero], },
{ rw [ne.def, ennreal.rpow_eq_top_iff, auto.not_or_eq, auto.not_and_eq, auto.not_and_eq],
split,
{ left,
rwa [ennreal.coe_eq_zero, nnnorm_eq_zero], },
{ exact or.inl ennreal.coe_ne_top, }, },
end
lemma snorm_ess_sup_const (c : F) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
snorm_ess_sup (λ x : α, c) μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [snorm_ess_sup, ess_sup_const _ hμ]
lemma snorm'_const_of_probability_measure (c : F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [probability_measure μ] :
snorm' (λ x : α , c) q μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by simp [snorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
lemma snorm_const (c : F) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
snorm (λ x : α , c) p μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/(ennreal.to_real p)) :=
begin
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [h_top, snorm_ess_sup_const c hμ], },
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm'_const,
ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h0.symm, h_top⟩],
end
lemma snorm_const' (c : F) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top: p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (λ x : α , c) p μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/(ennreal.to_real p)) :=
begin
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm'_const,
ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h0.symm, h_top⟩],
end
lemma mem_ℒp_const (c : E) [finite_measure μ] : mem_ℒp (λ a:α, c) p μ :=
begin
refine ⟨measurable_const.ae_measurable, _⟩,
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
by_cases hμ : μ = 0,
{ simp [hμ], },
rw snorm_const c h0 hμ,
refine ennreal.mul_lt_top ennreal.coe_lt_top _,
refine ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg _ (measure_ne_top μ set.univ),
simp,
end
end const
lemma snorm'_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ ∥g x∥) :
snorm' f q μ ≤ snorm' g q μ :=
begin
rw [snorm'],
refine ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (one_div_nonneg.2 hq),
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono $ λ x hx, _),
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow (ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 hx) hq
end
lemma snorm'_congr_norm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ = ∥g x∥) :
snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ :=
begin
have : (λ x, (nnnorm (f x) ^ q : ℝ≥0∞)) =ᵐ[μ] (λ x, nnnorm (g x) ^ q),
from hfg.mono (λ x hx, by { simp only [← coe_nnnorm, nnreal.coe_eq] at hx, simp [hx] }),
simp only [snorm', lintegral_congr_ae this]
end
lemma snorm'_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ :=
snorm'_congr_norm_ae (hfg.fun_comp _)
lemma snorm_ess_sup_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
snorm_ess_sup f μ = snorm_ess_sup g μ :=
ess_sup_congr_ae (hfg.fun_comp (coe ∘ nnnorm))
lemma snorm_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ ∥g x∥) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
begin
simp only [snorm],
split_ifs,
{ exact le_rfl },
{ refine ess_sup_mono_ae (h.mono $ λ x hx, _),
exact_mod_cast hx },
{ exact snorm'_mono_ae ennreal.to_real_nonneg h }
end
lemma snorm_ess_sup_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
snorm_ess_sup f μ ≤ ennreal.of_real C:=
begin
simp_rw [snorm_ess_sup, ← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm],
refine ess_sup_le_of_ae_le (ennreal.of_real C) (hfC.mono (λ x hx, _)),
exact ennreal.of_real_le_of_real hx,
end
lemma snorm_ess_sup_lt_top_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
snorm_ess_sup f μ < ∞ :=
(snorm_ess_sup_le_of_ae_bound hfC).trans_lt ennreal.of_real_lt_top
lemma snorm_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
snorm f p μ ≤ ((μ set.univ) ^ p.to_real⁻¹) * (ennreal.of_real C) :=
begin
by_cases hμ : μ = 0,
{ simp [hμ] },
haveI : μ.ae.ne_bot := ae_ne_bot.mpr hμ,
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ simp [hp] },
have hC : 0 ≤ C, from le_trans (norm_nonneg _) hfC.exists.some_spec,
have hC' : ∥C∥ = C := by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr hC],
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ ∥(λ _, C) x∥, from hfC.mono (λ x hx, hx.trans (le_of_eq hC'.symm)),
convert snorm_mono_ae this,
rw [snorm_const _ hp hμ, mul_comm, ← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, hC', one_div]
end
lemma snorm_congr_norm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ = ∥g x∥) :
snorm f p μ = snorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (snorm_mono_ae $ eventually_eq.le hfg)
(snorm_mono_ae $ (eventually_eq.symm hfg).le)
@[simp] lemma snorm'_norm {f : α → F} : snorm' (λ a, ∥f a∥) q μ = snorm' f q μ :=
by simp [snorm']
@[simp] lemma snorm_norm (f : α → F) : snorm (λ x, ∥f x∥) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
snorm_congr_norm_ae $ eventually_of_forall $ λ x, norm_norm _
lemma snorm'_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (p q : ℝ) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (λ x, ∥f x∥ ^ q) p μ = (snorm' f (p * q) μ) ^ q :=
begin
simp_rw snorm',
rw [← ennreal.rpow_mul, ←one_div_mul_one_div],
simp_rw one_div,
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel hq_pos.ne.symm, mul_one],
congr,
ext1 x,
simp_rw ← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm,
rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr (real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _),
mul_comm, ← ennreal.of_real_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hq_pos.le, ennreal.rpow_mul],
end
lemma snorm_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm (λ x, ∥f x∥ ^ q) p μ = (snorm f (p * ennreal.of_real q) μ) ^ q :=
begin
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0, ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos hq_pos], },
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ simp only [hp_top, snorm_exponent_top, ennreal.top_mul, hq_pos.not_le, ennreal.of_real_eq_zero,
if_false, snorm_exponent_top, snorm_ess_sup],
have h_rpow : ess_sup (λ (x : α), (nnnorm (∥f x∥ ^ q) : ℝ≥0∞)) μ
= ess_sup (λ (x : α), (↑(nnnorm (f x))) ^ q) μ,
{ congr,
ext1 x,
nth_rewrite 1 ← nnnorm_norm,
rw [ennreal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hq_pos.le, ennreal.coe_eq_coe],
ext,
push_cast,
rw real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), },
rw h_rpow,
have h_rpow_mono := ennreal.rpow_left_strict_mono_of_pos hq_pos,
have h_rpow_surj := (ennreal.rpow_left_bijective hq_pos.ne.symm).2,
let iso := h_rpow_mono.order_iso_of_surjective _ h_rpow_surj,
exact (iso.ess_sup_apply (λ x, ((nnnorm (f x)) : ℝ≥0∞)) μ).symm, },
rw [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 hp_top, snorm_eq_snorm' _ _],
swap, { refine mul_ne_zero h0 _, rwa [ne.def, ennreal.of_real_eq_zero, not_le], },
swap, { exact ennreal.mul_ne_top hp_top ennreal.of_real_ne_top, },
rw [ennreal.to_real_mul, ennreal.to_real_of_real hq_pos.le],
exact snorm'_norm_rpow f p.to_real q hq_pos,
end
lemma snorm_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : snorm f p μ = snorm g p μ :=
snorm_congr_norm_ae $ hfg.mono (λ x hx, hx ▸ rfl)
lemma mem_ℒp_congr_ae {f g : α → E} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : mem_ℒp f p μ ↔ mem_ℒp g p μ :=
by simp only [mem_ℒp, snorm_congr_ae hfg, ae_measurable_congr hfg]
lemma mem_ℒp.ae_eq {f g : α → E} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) (hf_Lp : mem_ℒp f p μ) : mem_ℒp g p μ :=
(mem_ℒp_congr_ae hfg).1 hf_Lp
lemma mem_ℒp.of_le [measurable_space F] {f : α → E} {g : α → F}
(hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ ∥g x∥) : mem_ℒp f p μ :=
⟨hf, (snorm_mono_ae hfg).trans_lt hg.snorm_lt_top⟩
lemma mem_ℒp_top_of_bound {f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (C : ℝ)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
mem_ℒp f ∞ μ :=
⟨hf, by { rw snorm_exponent_top, exact snorm_ess_sup_lt_top_of_ae_bound hfC, }⟩
lemma mem_ℒp.of_bound [finite_measure μ] {f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
(C : ℝ) (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
mem_ℒp f p μ :=
(mem_ℒp_const C).of_le hf (hfC.mono (λ x hx, le_trans hx (le_abs_self _)))
@[mono] lemma snorm'_mono_measure {μ ν : measure α} (f : α → F) (hμν : ν ≤ μ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
snorm' f q ν ≤ snorm' f q μ :=
begin
simp_rw snorm',
suffices h_integral_mono : (∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂ν) ≤ ∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ,
from ennreal.rpow_le_rpow h_integral_mono (by simp [hq]),
exact lintegral_mono' hμν le_rfl,
end
@[mono] lemma snorm_ess_sup_mono_measure {μ ν : measure α} (f : α → F) (hμν : ν ≪ μ) :
snorm_ess_sup f ν ≤ snorm_ess_sup f μ :=
by { simp_rw snorm_ess_sup, exact ess_sup_mono_measure hμν, }
@[mono] lemma snorm_mono_measure {μ ν : measure α} (f : α → F) (hμν : ν ≤ μ) :
snorm f p ν ≤ snorm f p μ :=
begin
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ simp [hp0], },
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [hp_top, snorm_ess_sup_mono_measure f (measure.absolutely_continuous_of_le hμν)], },
simp_rw snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top,
exact snorm'_mono_measure f hμν ennreal.to_real_nonneg,
end
lemma mem_ℒp.mono_measure {μ ν : measure α} {f : α → E} (hμν : ν ≤ μ) (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
mem_ℒp f p ν :=
⟨hf.1.mono_measure hμν, (snorm_mono_measure f hμν).trans_lt hf.2⟩
lemma mem_ℒp.restrict (s : set α) {f : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
mem_ℒp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
hf.mono_measure measure.restrict_le_self
section opens_measurable_space
variable [opens_measurable_space E]
lemma mem_ℒp.norm {f : α → E} (h : mem_ℒp f p μ) : mem_ℒp (λ x, ∥f x∥) p μ :=
h.of_le h.ae_measurable.norm (eventually_of_forall (λ x, by simp))
lemma snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q) (hf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
snorm' f q μ = 0 :=
by rw [snorm'_congr_ae hf_zero, snorm'_zero hq0_lt]
lemma snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) {f : α → F} (hf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
snorm' f q μ = 0 :=
by rw [snorm'_congr_ae hf_zero, snorm'_zero' hq0_ne hμ]
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_snorm'_eq_zero {f : α → E} (hq0 : 0 ≤ q) (hf : ae_measurable f μ)
(h : snorm' f q μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
begin
rw [snorm', ennreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff] at h,
cases h,
{ rw lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (hf.ennnorm.pow_const q) at h,
refine h.left.mono (λ x hx, _),
rw [pi.zero_apply, ennreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff] at hx,
cases hx,
{ cases hx with hx _,
rwa [←ennreal.coe_zero, ennreal.coe_eq_coe, nnnorm_eq_zero] at hx, },
{ exact absurd hx.left ennreal.coe_ne_top, }, },
{ exfalso,
rw [one_div, inv_lt_zero] at h,
exact hq0.not_lt h.right },
end
lemma snorm'_eq_zero_iff (hq0_lt : 0 < q) {f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
snorm' f q μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
⟨ae_eq_zero_of_snorm'_eq_zero (le_of_lt hq0_lt) hf, snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero hq0_lt⟩
lemma coe_nnnorm_ae_le_snorm_ess_sup (f : α → F) (μ : measure α) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (nnnorm (f x) : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ snorm_ess_sup f μ :=
ennreal.ae_le_ess_sup (λ x, (nnnorm (f x) : ℝ≥0∞))
@[simp] lemma snorm_ess_sup_eq_zero_iff {f : α → F} : snorm_ess_sup f μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
by simp [eventually_eq, snorm_ess_sup]
lemma snorm_eq_zero_iff {f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (h0 : p ≠ 0) :
snorm f p μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
begin
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ rw [h_top, snorm_exponent_top, snorm_ess_sup_eq_zero_iff], },
rw snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top,
exact snorm'_eq_zero_iff
(ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h0.symm, h_top⟩) hf,
end
section trim
variables {β : Type*} {m m0 : measurable_space β} {ν : measure β}
lemma snorm'_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → E} (hf : @measurable _ _ m _ f) :
@snorm' β E m _ f q (ν.trim hm) = snorm' f q ν :=
begin
simp_rw snorm',
congr' 1,
refine lintegral_trim hm _,
refine @measurable.pow_const _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m _ (@measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal _ m _ _) _,
exact @measurable.nnnorm E _ _ _ _ m _ hf,
end
lemma limsup_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : @measurable _ _ m _ f) :
(@measure.ae _ m (ν.trim hm)).limsup f = ν.ae.limsup f :=
begin
simp_rw limsup_eq,
suffices h_set_eq : {a : ℝ≥0∞ | filter.eventually (λ n, f n ≤ a) (@measure.ae _ m (ν.trim hm))}
= {a : ℝ≥0∞ | ∀ᵐ n ∂ν, f n ≤ a},
by rw h_set_eq,
ext1 a,
suffices h_meas_eq : ν {x | ¬ f x ≤ a} = ν.trim hm {x | ¬ f x ≤ a},
by simp_rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, ae_iff, h_meas_eq],
refine (trim_measurable_set_eq hm _).symm,
refine @measurable_set.compl _ _ m (@measurable_set_le ℝ≥0∞ _ _ _ _ m _ _ _ _ _ hf _),
exact @measurable_const _ _ _ m _,
end
lemma ess_sup_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : @measurable _ _ m _ f) :
@ess_sup _ _ m _ f (ν.trim hm) = ess_sup f ν :=
by { simp_rw ess_sup, exact limsup_trim hm hf, }
lemma snorm_ess_sup_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → E} (hf : @measurable _ _ m _ f) :
@snorm_ess_sup _ E m _ f (ν.trim hm) = snorm_ess_sup f ν :=
ess_sup_trim hm (@measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal _ m _ (@measurable.nnnorm E _ _ _ _ m _ hf))
lemma snorm_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → E} (hf : @measurable _ _ m _ f) :
@snorm _ E m _ f p (ν.trim hm) = snorm f p ν :=
begin
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ simpa only [h_top, snorm_exponent_top] using snorm_ess_sup_trim hm hf, },
simpa only [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top] using snorm'_trim hm hf,
end
lemma snorm_trim_ae (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → E} (hf : @ae_measurable _ _ m _ f (ν.trim hm)) :
@snorm _ E m _ f p (ν.trim hm) = snorm f p ν :=
begin
let g := @ae_measurable.mk _ _ m _ _ _ hf,
have hg_meas : @measurable _ _ m _ g, from @ae_measurable.measurable_mk _ _ m _ _ _ hf,
have hfg := @ae_measurable.ae_eq_mk _ _ m _ _ _ hf,
rw @snorm_congr_ae _ _ m _ _ _ _ _ hfg,
rw snorm_congr_ae (ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim hfg),
exact snorm_trim hm hg_meas,
end
lemma mem_ℒp_of_mem_ℒp_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → E} (hf : @mem_ℒp _ E m _ _ f p (ν.trim hm)) :
mem_ℒp f p ν :=
⟨ae_measurable_of_ae_measurable_trim hm hf.1, (le_of_eq (snorm_trim_ae hm hf.1).symm).trans_lt hf.2⟩
end trim
end opens_measurable_space
@[simp] lemma snorm'_neg {f : α → F} : snorm' (-f) q μ = snorm' f q μ := by simp [snorm']
@[simp] lemma snorm_neg {f : α → F} : snorm (-f) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
begin
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [h_top, snorm_ess_sup], },
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top],
end
section borel_space
variable [borel_space E]
lemma mem_ℒp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) : mem_ℒp (-f) p μ :=
⟨ae_measurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
lemma snorm'_le_snorm'_mul_rpow_measure_univ {p q : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) (hpq : p ≤ q)
{f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
snorm' f p μ ≤ snorm' f q μ * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/p - 1/q) :=
begin
have hq0_lt : 0 < q, from lt_of_lt_of_le hp0_lt hpq,
by_cases hpq_eq : p = q,
{ rw [hpq_eq, sub_self, ennreal.rpow_zero, mul_one],
exact le_refl _, },
have hpq : p < q, from lt_of_le_of_ne hpq hpq_eq,
let g := λ a : α, (1 : ℝ≥0∞),
have h_rw : ∫⁻ a, ↑(nnnorm (f a))^p ∂ μ = ∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a) * (g a))^p ∂ μ,
from lintegral_congr (λ a, by simp),
repeat {rw snorm'},
rw h_rw,
let r := p * q / (q - p),
have hpqr : 1/p = 1/q + 1/r,
{ field_simp [(ne_of_lt hp0_lt).symm,
(ne_of_lt hq0_lt).symm],
ring, },
calc (∫⁻ (a : α), (↑(nnnorm (f a)) * g a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)
≤ (∫⁻ (a : α), ↑(nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) * (∫⁻ (a : α), (g a) ^ r ∂μ) ^ (1/r) :
ennreal.lintegral_Lp_mul_le_Lq_mul_Lr hp0_lt hpq hpqr μ hf.ennnorm
ae_measurable_const
... = (∫⁻ (a : α), ↑(nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1/q) * μ set.univ ^ (1/p - 1/q) :
by simp [hpqr],
end
lemma snorm'_le_snorm_ess_sup_mul_rpow_measure_univ (hq_pos : 0 < q) {f : α → F} :
snorm' f q μ ≤ snorm_ess_sup f μ * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/q) :=
begin
have h_le : ∫⁻ (a : α), ↑(nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ (a : α), (snorm_ess_sup f μ) ^ q ∂μ,
{ refine lintegral_mono_ae _,
have h_nnnorm_le_snorm_ess_sup := coe_nnnorm_ae_le_snorm_ess_sup f μ,
refine h_nnnorm_le_snorm_ess_sup.mono (λ x hx, ennreal.rpow_le_rpow hx (le_of_lt hq_pos)), },
rw [snorm', ←ennreal.rpow_one (snorm_ess_sup f μ)],
nth_rewrite 1 ←mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm,
rw [ennreal.rpow_mul, one_div,
←ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ q⁻¹)],
refine ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (by simp [hq_pos.le]),
rwa lintegral_const at h_le,
end
lemma snorm_le_snorm_mul_rpow_measure_univ {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) {f : α → E}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm f q μ * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/p.to_real - 1/q.to_real) :=
begin
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ simp [hp0, zero_le], },
rw ← ne.def at hp0,
have hp0_lt : 0 < p, from lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) hp0.symm,
have hq0_lt : 0 < q, from lt_of_lt_of_le hp0_lt hpq,
by_cases hq_top : q = ∞,
{ simp only [hq_top, div_zero, one_div, ennreal.top_to_real, sub_zero, snorm_exponent_top,
inv_zero],
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ simp only [hp_top, ennreal.rpow_zero, mul_one, ennreal.top_to_real, sub_zero, inv_zero,
snorm_exponent_top],
exact le_rfl, },
rw snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top,
have hp_pos : 0 < p.to_real, from ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨hp0_lt, hp_top⟩,
refine (snorm'_le_snorm_ess_sup_mul_rpow_measure_univ hp_pos).trans (le_of_eq _),
congr,
exact one_div _, },
have hp_lt_top : p < ∞, from hpq.trans_lt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hq_top),
have hp_pos : 0 < p.to_real, from ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨hp0_lt, hp_lt_top.ne⟩,
rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp0_lt.ne.symm hp_lt_top.ne, snorm_eq_snorm' hq0_lt.ne.symm hq_top],
have hpq_real : p.to_real ≤ q.to_real, by rwa ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hp_lt_top.ne hq_top,
exact snorm'_le_snorm'_mul_rpow_measure_univ hp_pos hpq_real hf,
end
lemma snorm'_le_snorm'_of_exponent_le {p q : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) (hpq : p ≤ q) (μ : measure α)
[probability_measure μ] {f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
snorm' f p μ ≤ snorm' f q μ :=
begin
have h_le_μ := snorm'_le_snorm'_mul_rpow_measure_univ hp0_lt hpq hf,
rwa [measure_univ, ennreal.one_rpow, mul_one] at h_le_μ,
end
lemma snorm'_le_snorm_ess_sup (hq_pos : 0 < q) {f : α → F} [probability_measure μ] :
snorm' f q μ ≤ snorm_ess_sup f μ :=
le_trans (snorm'_le_snorm_ess_sup_mul_rpow_measure_univ hq_pos) (le_of_eq (by simp [measure_univ]))
lemma snorm_le_snorm_of_exponent_le {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) [probability_measure μ]
{f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm f q μ :=
(snorm_le_snorm_mul_rpow_measure_univ hpq hf).trans (le_of_eq (by simp [measure_univ]))
lemma snorm'_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top_of_exponent_le {p q : ℝ} [finite_measure μ] {f : α → E}
(hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hfq_lt_top : snorm' f q μ < ∞) (hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) (hpq : p ≤ q) :
snorm' f p μ < ∞ :=
begin
cases le_or_lt p 0 with hp_nonpos hp_pos,
{ rw le_antisymm hp_nonpos hp_nonneg,
simp, },
have hq_pos : 0 < q, from lt_of_lt_of_le hp_pos hpq,
calc snorm' f p μ
≤ snorm' f q μ * (μ set.univ) ^ (1/p - 1/q) :
snorm'_le_snorm'_mul_rpow_measure_univ hp_pos hpq hf
... < ∞ :
begin
rw ennreal.mul_lt_top_iff,
refine or.inl ⟨hfq_lt_top, ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg _ (measure_ne_top μ set.univ)⟩,
rwa [le_sub, sub_zero, one_div, one_div, inv_le_inv hq_pos hp_pos],
end
end
lemma mem_ℒp.mem_ℒp_of_exponent_le {p q : ℝ≥0∞} [finite_measure μ] {f : α → E}
(hfq : mem_ℒp f q μ) (hpq : p ≤ q) :
mem_ℒp f p μ :=
begin
cases hfq with hfq_m hfq_lt_top,
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ rwa [hp0, mem_ℒp_zero_iff_ae_measurable], },
rw ←ne.def at hp0,
refine ⟨hfq_m, _⟩,
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ have hq_top : q = ∞,
by rwa [hp_top, top_le_iff] at hpq,
rw [hp_top],
rwa hq_top at hfq_lt_top, },
have hp_pos : 0 < p.to_real,
from ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) hp0.symm, hp_top⟩,
by_cases hq_top : q = ∞,
{ rw snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top,
rw [hq_top, snorm_exponent_top] at hfq_lt_top,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm'_le_snorm_ess_sup_mul_rpow_measure_univ hp_pos) _,
refine ennreal.mul_lt_top hfq_lt_top _,
exact ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp [le_of_lt hp_pos]) (measure_ne_top μ set.univ), },
have hq0 : q ≠ 0,
{ by_contra hq_eq_zero,
push_neg at hq_eq_zero,
have hp_eq_zero : p = 0, from le_antisymm (by rwa hq_eq_zero at hpq) (zero_le _),
rw [hp_eq_zero, ennreal.zero_to_real] at hp_pos,
exact (lt_irrefl _) hp_pos, },
have hpq_real : p.to_real ≤ q.to_real, by rwa ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hp_top hq_top,
rw snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top,
rw snorm_eq_snorm' hq0 hq_top at hfq_lt_top,
exact snorm'_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top_of_exponent_le hfq_m hfq_lt_top (le_of_lt hp_pos) hpq_real,
end
lemma snorm'_add_le {f g : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hq1 : 1 ≤ q) :
snorm' (f + g) q μ ≤ snorm' f q μ + snorm' g q μ :=
calc (∫⁻ a, ↑(nnnorm ((f + g) a)) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q)
≤ (∫⁻ a, (((λ a, (nnnorm (f a) : ℝ≥0∞))
+ (λ a, (nnnorm (g a) : ℝ≥0∞))) a) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) :
begin
refine ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (by simp [le_trans zero_le_one hq1] : 0 ≤ 1 / q),
refine lintegral_mono (λ a, ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (le_trans zero_le_one hq1)),
simp [←ennreal.coe_add, nnnorm_add_le],
end
... ≤ snorm' f q μ + snorm' g q μ :
ennreal.lintegral_Lp_add_le hf.ennnorm hg.ennnorm hq1
lemma snorm_ess_sup_add_le {f g : α → F} :
snorm_ess_sup (f + g) μ ≤ snorm_ess_sup f μ + snorm_ess_sup g μ :=
begin
refine le_trans (ess_sup_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall (λ x, _)))
(ennreal.ess_sup_add_le _ _),
simp_rw [pi.add_apply, ←ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe],
exact nnnorm_add_le _ _,
end
lemma snorm_add_le {f g : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) :
snorm (f + g) p μ ≤ snorm f p μ + snorm g p μ :=
begin
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ simp [hp0], },
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [hp_top, snorm_ess_sup_add_le], },
have hp1_real : 1 ≤ p.to_real,
by rwa [← ennreal.one_to_real, ennreal.to_real_le_to_real ennreal.one_ne_top hp_top],
repeat { rw snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top, },
exact snorm'_add_le hf hg hp1_real,
end
lemma snorm'_sum_le [second_countable_topology E] {ι} {f : ι → α → E} {s : finset ι}
(hfs : ∀ i, i ∈ s → ae_measurable (f i) μ) (hq1 : 1 ≤ q) :
snorm' (∑ i in s, f i) q μ ≤ ∑ i in s, snorm' (f i) q μ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive_on_pred (λ (f : α → E), snorm' f q μ)
(λ f, ae_measurable f μ) (snorm'_zero (zero_lt_one.trans_le hq1))
(λ f g hf hg, snorm'_add_le hf hg hq1) (λ x y, ae_measurable.add) _ hfs
lemma snorm_sum_le [second_countable_topology E] {ι} {f : ι → α → E} {s : finset ι}
(hfs : ∀ i, i ∈ s → ae_measurable (f i) μ) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) :
snorm (∑ i in s, f i) p μ ≤ ∑ i in s, snorm (f i) p μ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive_on_pred (λ (f : α → E), snorm f p μ)
(λ f, ae_measurable f μ) snorm_zero (λ f g hf hg, snorm_add_le hf hg hp1)
(λ x y, ae_measurable.add) _ hfs
lemma snorm_add_lt_top_of_one_le {f g : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ)
(hq1 : 1 ≤ p) : snorm (f + g) p μ < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_add_le hf.1 hg.1 hq1) (ennreal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hf.2, hg.2⟩)
lemma snorm'_add_lt_top_of_le_one {f g : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ)
(hf_snorm : snorm' f q μ < ∞) (hg_snorm : snorm' g q μ < ∞) (hq_pos : 0 < q) (hq1 : q ≤ 1) :
snorm' (f + g) q μ < ∞ :=
calc (∫⁻ a, ↑(nnnorm ((f + g) a)) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q)
≤ (∫⁻ a, (((λ a, (nnnorm (f a) : ℝ≥0∞))
+ (λ a, (nnnorm (g a) : ℝ≥0∞))) a) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) :
begin
refine ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q),
refine lintegral_mono (λ a, ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ hq_pos.le),
simp [←ennreal.coe_add, nnnorm_add_le],
end
... ≤ (∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q + (nnnorm (g a) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) :
begin
refine ennreal.rpow_le_rpow (lintegral_mono (λ a, _)) (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q),
exact ennreal.rpow_add_le_add_rpow _ _ hq_pos hq1,
end
... < ∞ :
begin
refine ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q) _,
rw [lintegral_add' (hf.ennnorm.pow_const q)
(hg.ennnorm.pow_const q), ennreal.add_ne_top, ←lt_top_iff_ne_top,
←lt_top_iff_ne_top],
exact ⟨lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top hq_pos hf_snorm,
lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top hq_pos hg_snorm⟩,
end
lemma snorm_add_lt_top {f g : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) :
snorm (f + g) p μ < ∞ :=
begin
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
rw ←ne.def at h0,
cases le_total 1 p with hp1 hp1,
{ exact snorm_add_lt_top_of_one_le hf hg hp1, },
have hp_top : p ≠ ∞, from (lt_of_le_of_lt hp1 ennreal.coe_lt_top).ne,
have hp_pos : 0 < p.to_real,
{ rw [← ennreal.zero_to_real, @ennreal.to_real_lt_to_real 0 p ennreal.coe_ne_top hp_top],
exact ((zero_le p).lt_of_ne h0.symm), },
have hp1_real : p.to_real ≤ 1,
{ rwa [← ennreal.one_to_real, @ennreal.to_real_le_to_real p 1 hp_top ennreal.coe_ne_top], },
rw snorm_eq_snorm' h0 hp_top,
rw [mem_ℒp, snorm_eq_snorm' h0 hp_top] at hf hg,
exact snorm'_add_lt_top_of_le_one hf.1 hg.1 hf.2 hg.2 hp_pos hp1_real,
end
section second_countable_topology
variable [second_countable_topology E]
lemma mem_ℒp.add {f g : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) : mem_ℒp (f + g) p μ :=
⟨ae_measurable.add hf.1 hg.1, snorm_add_lt_top hf hg⟩
lemma mem_ℒp.sub {f g : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) : mem_ℒp (f - g) p μ :=
by { rw sub_eq_add_neg, exact hf.add hg.neg }
end second_countable_topology
end borel_space
section normed_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
lemma snorm'_const_smul {f : α → F} (c : 𝕜) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (c • f) q μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) * snorm' f q μ :=
begin
rw snorm',
simp_rw [pi.smul_apply, nnnorm_smul, ennreal.coe_mul,
ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hq_pos.le],
suffices h_integral : ∫⁻ a, ↑(nnnorm c) ^ q * ↑(nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ
= (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞)^q * ∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f a)) ^ q ∂μ,
{ apply_fun (λ x, x ^ (1/q)) at h_integral,
rw [h_integral, ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)],
congr,
simp_rw [←ennreal.rpow_mul, one_div, mul_inv_cancel hq_pos.ne.symm, ennreal.rpow_one], },
rw lintegral_const_mul',
rw ennreal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hq_pos.le,
exact ennreal.coe_ne_top,
end
lemma snorm_ess_sup_const_smul {f : α → F} (c : 𝕜) :
snorm_ess_sup (c • f) μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) * snorm_ess_sup f μ :=
by simp_rw [snorm_ess_sup, pi.smul_apply, nnnorm_smul, ennreal.coe_mul, ennreal.ess_sup_const_mul]
lemma snorm_const_smul {f : α → F} (c : 𝕜) :
snorm (c • f) p μ = (nnnorm c : ℝ≥0∞) * snorm f p μ :=
begin
by_cases h0 : p = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [h_top, snorm_ess_sup_const_smul], },
repeat { rw snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, },
rw ←ne.def at h0,
exact snorm'_const_smul c
(ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) h0.symm, h_top⟩),
end
lemma mem_ℒp.const_smul [measurable_space 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [borel_space E] {f : α → E}
(hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (c : 𝕜) :
mem_ℒp (c • f) p μ :=
⟨ae_measurable.const_smul hf.1 c,
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq (snorm_const_smul c)) (ennreal.mul_lt_top ennreal.coe_lt_top hf.2)⟩
lemma mem_ℒp.const_mul [measurable_space 𝕜] [borel_space 𝕜]
{f : α → 𝕜} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (c : 𝕜) : mem_ℒp (λ x, c * f x) p μ :=
hf.const_smul c
lemma snorm'_smul_le_mul_snorm' [opens_measurable_space E] [measurable_space 𝕜]
[opens_measurable_space 𝕜] {p q r : ℝ}
{f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) {φ : α → 𝕜} (hφ : ae_measurable φ μ)
(hp0_lt : 0 < p) (hpq : p < q) (hpqr : 1/p = 1/q + 1/r) :
snorm' (φ • f) p μ ≤ snorm' φ q μ * snorm' f r μ :=
begin
simp_rw [snorm', pi.smul_apply', nnnorm_smul, ennreal.coe_mul],
exact ennreal.lintegral_Lp_mul_le_Lq_mul_Lr hp0_lt hpq hpqr μ hφ.ennnorm
hf.ennnorm,
end
end normed_space
section monotonicity
lemma snorm_le_mul_snorm_aux_of_nonneg {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ c * ∥g x∥) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (p : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm f p μ ≤ (ennreal.of_real c) * snorm g p μ :=
begin
lift c to ℝ≥0 using hc,
rw [ennreal.of_real_coe_nnreal, ← c.nnnorm_eq, ← snorm_norm g, ← snorm_const_smul (c : ℝ)],
swap, apply_instance,
refine snorm_mono_ae _,
simpa
end
lemma snorm_le_mul_snorm_aux_of_neg {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ c * ∥g x∥) (hc : c < 0) (p : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm f p μ = 0 ∧ snorm g p μ = 0 :=
begin
suffices : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 ∧ g =ᵐ[μ] 0,
by simp [snorm_congr_ae this.1, snorm_congr_ae this.2],
refine ⟨h.mono $ λ x hx, _, h.mono $ λ x hx, _⟩,
{ refine norm_le_zero_iff.1 (hx.trans _),
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hc.le (norm_nonneg _) },
{ refine norm_le_zero_iff.1 (nonpos_of_mul_nonneg_right _ hc),
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans hx }
end
lemma snorm_le_mul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ c * ∥g x∥) (p : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm f p μ ≤ (ennreal.of_real c) * snorm g p μ :=
begin
cases le_or_lt 0 c with hc hc,
{ exact snorm_le_mul_snorm_aux_of_nonneg h hc p },
{ simp [snorm_le_mul_snorm_aux_of_neg h hc p] }
end
lemma mem_ℒp.of_le_mul [measurable_space F] {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {c : ℝ}
(hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ c * ∥g x∥) :
mem_ℒp f p μ :=
begin
simp only [mem_ℒp, hf, true_and],
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_le_mul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul hfg p),
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, hg.snorm_ne_top],
end
end monotonicity
end ℒp
/-!
### Lp space
The space of equivalence classes of measurable functions for which `snorm f p μ < ∞`.
-/
@[simp] lemma snorm_ae_eq_fun {α E : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
[measurable_space E] [normed_group E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
snorm (ae_eq_fun.mk f hf) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
snorm_congr_ae (ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_mk _ _)
lemma mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top {α E : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
[measurable_space E] [normed_group E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfp : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
snorm (ae_eq_fun.mk f hfp.1) p μ < ∞ :=
by simp [hfp.2]
/-- Lp space -/
def Lp {α} (E : Type*) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space E] [normed_group E]
[borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
(p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : measure α) : add_subgroup (α →ₘ[μ] E) :=
{ carrier := {f | snorm f p μ < ∞},
zero_mem' := by simp [snorm_congr_ae ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_zero, snorm_zero],
add_mem' := λ f g hf hg, by simp [snorm_congr_ae (ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_add _ _),
snorm_add_lt_top ⟨f.ae_measurable, hf⟩ ⟨g.ae_measurable, hg⟩],
neg_mem' := λ f hf,
by rwa [set.mem_set_of_eq, snorm_congr_ae (ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_neg _), snorm_neg] }
localized "notation α ` →₁[`:25 μ `] ` E := measure_theory.Lp E 1 μ" in measure_theory
localized "notation α ` →₂[`:25 μ `] ` E := measure_theory.Lp E 2 μ" in measure_theory
namespace mem_ℒp
variables [borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
/-- make an element of Lp from a function verifying `mem_ℒp` -/
def to_Lp (f : α → E) (h_mem_ℒp : mem_ℒp f p μ) : Lp E p μ :=
⟨ae_eq_fun.mk f h_mem_ℒp.1, h_mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top⟩
lemma coe_fn_to_Lp {f : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) : hf.to_Lp f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_mk _ _
@[simp] lemma to_Lp_eq_to_Lp_iff {f g : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) :
hf.to_Lp f = hg.to_Lp g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
by simp [to_Lp]
@[simp] lemma to_Lp_zero (h : mem_ℒp (0 : α → E) p μ ) : h.to_Lp 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma to_Lp_add {f g : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) :
(hf.add hg).to_Lp (f + g) = hf.to_Lp f + hg.to_Lp g := rfl
lemma to_Lp_neg {f : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) : hf.neg.to_Lp (-f) = - hf.to_Lp f := rfl
lemma to_Lp_sub {f g : α → E} (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) :
(hf.sub hg).to_Lp (f - g) = hf.to_Lp f - hg.to_Lp g := rfl
end mem_ℒp
namespace Lp
variables [borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (Lp E p μ) := ⟨λ _, α → E, λ f, ((f : α →ₘ[μ] E) : α → E)⟩
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : Lp E p μ} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f = g :=
begin
cases f,
cases g,
simp only [subtype.mk_eq_mk],
exact ae_eq_fun.ext h
end
lemma ext_iff {f g : Lp E p μ} : f = g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨λ h, by rw h, λ h, ext h⟩
lemma mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ snorm f p μ < ∞ := iff.refl _
lemma mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ mem_ℒp f p μ :=
by simp [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, mem_ℒp, f.measurable.ae_measurable]
lemma antimono [finite_measure μ] {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) : Lp E q μ ≤ Lp E p μ :=
λ f hf, (mem_ℒp.mem_ℒp_of_exponent_le ⟨f.ae_measurable, hf⟩ hpq).2
@[simp] lemma coe_fn_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α → E) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α →ₘ[μ] E) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_Lp_coe_fn (f : Lp E p μ) (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) : hf.to_Lp f = f :=
by { cases f, simp [mem_ℒp.to_Lp] }
lemma snorm_lt_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ < ∞ := f.prop
lemma snorm_ne_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ ≠ ∞ := (snorm_lt_top f).ne
@[measurability]
protected lemma measurable (f : Lp E p μ) : measurable f := f.val.measurable
@[measurability]
protected lemma ae_measurable (f : Lp E p μ) : ae_measurable f μ := f.val.ae_measurable
protected lemma mem_ℒp (f : Lp E p μ) : mem_ℒp f p μ := ⟨Lp.ae_measurable f, f.prop⟩
variables (E p μ)
lemma coe_fn_zero : ⇑(0 : Lp E p μ) =ᵐ[μ] 0 := ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_zero
variables {E p μ}
lemma coe_fn_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(-f) =ᵐ[μ] -f := ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_neg _
lemma coe_fn_add (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f + g) =ᵐ[μ] f + g := ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_add _ _
lemma coe_fn_sub (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f - g) =ᵐ[μ] f - g := ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_sub _ _
lemma mem_Lp_const (α) [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α) (c : E) [finite_measure μ] :
@ae_eq_fun.const α _ _ μ _ c ∈ Lp E p μ :=
(mem_ℒp_const c).snorm_mk_lt_top
instance : has_norm (Lp E p μ) := { norm := λ f, ennreal.to_real (snorm f p μ) }
instance : has_dist (Lp E p μ) := { dist := λ f g, ∥f - g∥}
instance : has_edist (Lp E p μ) := { edist := λ f g, ennreal.of_real (dist f g) }
lemma norm_def (f : Lp E p μ) : ∥f∥ = ennreal.to_real (snorm f p μ) := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_to_Lp (f : α → E) (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
∥hf.to_Lp f∥ = ennreal.to_real (snorm f p μ) :=
by rw [norm_def, snorm_congr_ae (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp hf)]
lemma dist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = (snorm (f - g) p μ).to_real :=
begin
simp_rw [dist, norm_def],
congr' 1,
apply snorm_congr_ae (coe_fn_sub _ _),
end
lemma edist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : edist f g = snorm (f - g) p μ :=
begin
simp_rw [edist, dist, norm_def, ennreal.of_real_to_real (snorm_ne_top _)],
exact snorm_congr_ae (coe_fn_sub _ _)
end
@[simp] lemma edist_to_Lp_to_Lp (f g : α → E) (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hg : mem_ℒp g p μ) :
edist (hf.to_Lp f) (hg.to_Lp g) = snorm (f - g) p μ :=
by { rw edist_def, exact snorm_congr_ae (hf.coe_fn_to_Lp.sub hg.coe_fn_to_Lp) }
@[simp] lemma edist_to_Lp_zero (f : α → E) (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
edist (hf.to_Lp f) 0 = snorm f p μ :=
by { convert edist_to_Lp_to_Lp f 0 hf zero_mem_ℒp, simp }
@[simp] lemma norm_zero : ∥(0 : Lp E p μ)∥ = 0 :=
begin
change (snorm ⇑(0 : α →ₘ[μ] E) p μ).to_real = 0,
simp [snorm_congr_ae ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_zero, snorm_zero]
end
lemma norm_eq_zero_iff {f : Lp E p μ} (hp : 0 < p) : ∥f∥ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hf, _, λ hf, by simp [hf]⟩,
rw [norm_def, ennreal.to_real_eq_zero_iff] at hf,
cases hf,
{ rw snorm_eq_zero_iff (Lp.ae_measurable f) hp.ne.symm at hf,
exact subtype.eq (ae_eq_fun.ext (hf.trans ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_zero.symm)), },
{ exact absurd hf (snorm_ne_top f), },
end
lemma eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero {f : Lp E p μ} : f = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
rw h,
exact ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_const _ _ },
{ assume h,
ext1,
filter_upwards [h, ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_const α (0 : E)],
assume a ha h'a,
rw ha,
exact h'a.symm }
end
@[simp] lemma norm_neg {f : Lp E p μ} : ∥-f∥ = ∥f∥ :=
by rw [norm_def, norm_def, snorm_congr_ae (coe_fn_neg _), snorm_neg]
lemma norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul
[second_countable_topology F] [measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
{c : ℝ} {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ c * ∥g x∥) : ∥f∥ ≤ c * ∥g∥ :=
begin
by_cases pzero : p = 0,
{ simp [pzero, norm_def] },
cases le_or_lt 0 c with hc hc,
{ have := snorm_le_mul_snorm_aux_of_nonneg h hc p,
rw [← ennreal.to_real_le_to_real, ennreal.to_real_mul, ennreal.to_real_of_real hc] at this,
{ exact this },
{ exact (Lp.mem_ℒp _).snorm_ne_top },
{ simp [(Lp.mem_ℒp _).snorm_ne_top] } },
{ have := snorm_le_mul_snorm_aux_of_neg h hc p,
simp only [snorm_eq_zero_iff (Lp.ae_measurable _) pzero, ← eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero] at this,
simp [this] }
end
lemma norm_le_norm_of_ae_le [second_countable_topology F] [measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
{f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ ∥g x∥) : ∥f∥ ≤ ∥g∥ :=
begin
rw [norm_def, norm_def, ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (snorm_ne_top _) (snorm_ne_top _)],
exact snorm_mono_ae h
end
lemma mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul [second_countable_topology F] [measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
{c : ℝ} {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ c * ∥g x∥) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp.2 $ mem_ℒp.of_le_mul (Lp.mem_ℒp g) f.ae_measurable h
lemma mem_Lp_of_ae_le [second_countable_topology F] [measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
{f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ ∥g x∥) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp.2 $ mem_ℒp.of_le (Lp.mem_ℒp g) f.ae_measurable h
lemma mem_Lp_of_ae_bound [finite_measure μ] {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (C : ℝ) (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp.2 $ mem_ℒp.of_bound f.ae_measurable _ hfC
lemma norm_le_of_ae_bound [finite_measure μ] {f : Lp E p μ} {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
∥f∥ ≤ (measure_univ_nnreal μ) ^ (p.to_real)⁻¹ * C :=
begin
by_cases hμ : μ = 0,
{ by_cases hp : p.to_real⁻¹ = 0,
{ simpa [hp, hμ, norm_def] using hC },
{ simp [hμ, norm_def, real.zero_rpow hp] } },
let A : ℝ≥0 := (measure_univ_nnreal μ) ^ (p.to_real)⁻¹ * ⟨C, hC⟩,
suffices : snorm f p μ ≤ A,
{ exact ennreal.to_real_le_coe_of_le_coe this },
convert snorm_le_of_ae_bound hfC,
rw [← coe_measure_univ_nnreal μ, ennreal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (measure_univ_nnreal_pos hμ).ne',
ennreal.coe_mul],
congr,
rw max_eq_left hC
end
instance [hp : fact (1 ≤ p)] : normed_group (Lp E p μ) :=
normed_group.of_core _
{ norm_eq_zero_iff := λ f, norm_eq_zero_iff (ennreal.zero_lt_one.trans_le hp.1),
triangle := begin
assume f g,
simp only [norm_def],
rw ← ennreal.to_real_add (snorm_ne_top f) (snorm_ne_top g),
suffices h_snorm : snorm ⇑(f + g) p μ ≤ snorm ⇑f p μ + snorm ⇑g p μ,
{ rwa ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (snorm_ne_top (f + g)),
exact ennreal.add_ne_top.mpr ⟨snorm_ne_top f, snorm_ne_top g⟩, },
rw [snorm_congr_ae (coe_fn_add _ _)],
exact snorm_add_le (Lp.ae_measurable f) (Lp.ae_measurable g) hp.1,
end,
norm_neg := by simp }
instance normed_group_L1 : normed_group (Lp E 1 μ) := by apply_instance
instance normed_group_L2 : normed_group (Lp E 2 μ) := by apply_instance
instance normed_group_Ltop : normed_group (Lp E ∞ μ) := by apply_instance
section normed_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [measurable_space 𝕜]
[opens_measurable_space 𝕜]
lemma mem_Lp_const_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : c • ↑f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
begin
rw [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, snorm_congr_ae (ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_smul _ _), snorm_const_smul,
ennreal.mul_lt_top_iff],
exact or.inl ⟨ennreal.coe_lt_top, f.prop⟩,
end
variables (E p μ 𝕜)
/-- The `𝕜`-submodule of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` whose `Lp` norm is finite. This is `Lp E p μ`,
with extra structure. -/
def Lp_submodule : submodule 𝕜 (α →ₘ[μ] E) :=
{ smul_mem' := λ c f hf, by simpa using mem_Lp_const_smul c ⟨f, hf⟩,
.. Lp E p μ }
variables {E p μ 𝕜}
lemma coe_Lp_submodule : (Lp_submodule E p μ 𝕜).to_add_subgroup = Lp E p μ := rfl
instance : module 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
{ .. (Lp_submodule E p μ 𝕜).module }
lemma coe_fn_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(c • f) =ᵐ[μ] c • f := ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_smul _ _
lemma norm_const_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : ∥c • f∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥f∥ :=
by rw [norm_def, snorm_congr_ae (coe_fn_smul _ _), snorm_const_smul c,
ennreal.to_real_mul, ennreal.coe_to_real, coe_nnnorm, norm_def]
instance [fact (1 ≤ p)] : normed_space 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ _ _, by simp [norm_const_smul] }
instance normed_space_L1 : normed_space 𝕜 (Lp E 1 μ) := by apply_instance
instance normed_space_L2 : normed_space 𝕜 (Lp E 2 μ) := by apply_instance
instance normed_space_Ltop : normed_space 𝕜 (Lp E ∞ μ) := by apply_instance
end normed_space
end Lp
namespace mem_ℒp
variables
[borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
{𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [measurable_space 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜]
lemma to_Lp_const_smul {f : α → E} (c : 𝕜) (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
(hf.const_smul c).to_Lp (c • f) = c • hf.to_Lp f := rfl
end mem_ℒp
/-! ### Indicator of a set as an element of Lᵖ
For a set `s` with `(hs : measurable_set s)` and `(hμs : μ s < ∞)`, we build
`indicator_const_Lp p hs hμs c`, the element of `Lp` corresponding to `s.indicator (λ x, c)`.
-/
section indicator
variables {s : set α} {hs : measurable_set s} {c : E} {f : α → E} {hf : ae_measurable f μ}
lemma snorm_ess_sup_indicator_le (s : set α) (f : α → G) :
snorm_ess_sup (s.indicator f) μ ≤ snorm_ess_sup f μ :=
begin
refine ess_sup_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall (λ x, _)),
rw [ennreal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm],
exact set.indicator_le_self s _ x,
end
lemma snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_le (s : set α) (c : G) :
snorm_ess_sup (s.indicator (λ x : α , c)) μ ≤ ∥c∥₊ :=
begin
by_cases hμ0 : μ = 0,
{ rw [hμ0, snorm_ess_sup_measure_zero, ennreal.coe_nonneg],
exact zero_le', },
{ exact (snorm_ess_sup_indicator_le s (λ x, c)).trans (snorm_ess_sup_const c hμ0).le, },
end
lemma snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_eq (s : set α) (c : G) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) :
snorm_ess_sup (s.indicator (λ x : α , c)) μ = ∥c∥₊ :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_le s c) _,
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
have h' := ae_iff.mp (ae_lt_of_ess_sup_lt h),
push_neg at h',
refine hμs (measure_mono_null (λ x hx_mem, _) h'),
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.indicator_of_mem hx_mem],
exact le_rfl,
end
variables (hs)
lemma snorm_indicator_le {E : Type*} [normed_group E] (f : α → E) :
snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ snorm f p μ :=
begin
refine snorm_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall (λ x, _)),
suffices : ∥s.indicator f x∥₊ ≤ ∥f x∥₊,
{ exact nnreal.coe_mono this },
rw nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm,
exact s.indicator_le_self _ x,
end
variables {hs}
lemma snorm_indicator_const {c : G} (hs : measurable_set s) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (s.indicator (λ x, c)) p μ = ∥c∥₊ * (μ s) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
begin
have hp_pos : 0 < p.to_real,
from ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) hp.symm, hp_top⟩,
rw snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp hp_top,
simp_rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ennreal.coe_indicator],
have h_indicator_pow : (λ a : α, s.indicator (λ (x : α), (∥c∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ p.to_real)
= s.indicator (λ (x : α), ↑∥c∥₊ ^ p.to_real),
{ rw set.comp_indicator_const (∥c∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) (λ x, x ^ p.to_real) _,
simp [hp_pos], },
rw [h_indicator_pow, lintegral_indicator _ hs, set_lintegral_const, ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg],
{ rw [← ennreal.rpow_mul, mul_one_div_cancel hp_pos.ne.symm, ennreal.rpow_one], },
{ simp [hp_pos.le], },
end
lemma snorm_indicator_const' {c : G} (hs : measurable_set s) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
snorm (s.indicator (λ _, c)) p μ = ∥c∥₊ * (μ s) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
begin
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [hp_top, snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_eq s c hμs], },
{ exact snorm_indicator_const hs hp hp_top, },
end
lemma mem_ℒp.indicator (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
mem_ℒp (s.indicator f) p μ :=
⟨hf.ae_measurable.indicator hs, lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_indicator_le f) hf.snorm_lt_top⟩
lemma mem_ℒp_indicator_const (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : measurable_set s) (c : E) (hμsc : c = 0 ∨ μ s ≠ ∞) :
mem_ℒp (s.indicator (λ _, c)) p μ :=
begin
cases hμsc with hc hμs,
{ simp only [hc, set.indicator_zero],
exact zero_mem_ℒp, },
refine ⟨(ae_measurable_indicator_iff hs).mpr ae_measurable_const, _⟩,
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ simp only [hp0, snorm_exponent_zero, with_top.zero_lt_top], },
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ rw [hp_top, snorm_exponent_top],
exact (snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_le s c).trans_lt ennreal.coe_lt_top, },
have hp_pos : 0 < p.to_real,
from ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) (ne.symm hp0), hp_top⟩,
rw snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top hp0 hp_top,
simp_rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ennreal.coe_indicator],
have h_indicator_pow : (λ a : α, s.indicator (λ _, (∥c∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ p.to_real)
= s.indicator (λ _, ↑∥c∥₊ ^ p.to_real),
{ rw set.comp_indicator_const (∥c∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) (λ x, x ^ p.to_real) _, simp [hp_pos], },
rw [h_indicator_pow, lintegral_indicator _ hs, set_lintegral_const],
refine ennreal.mul_lt_top _ (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hμs),
exact ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg hp_pos.le ennreal.coe_ne_top,
end
end indicator
section indicator_const_Lp
open set function
variables {s : set α} {hs : measurable_set s} {hμs : μ s ≠ ∞} {c : E}
[borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
/-- Indicator of a set as an element of `Lp`. -/
def indicator_const_Lp (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : measurable_set s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) : Lp E p μ :=
mem_ℒp.to_Lp (s.indicator (λ _, c)) (mem_ℒp_indicator_const p hs c (or.inr hμs))
lemma indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn : ⇑(indicator_const_Lp p hs hμs c) =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (λ _, c) :=
mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp (mem_ℒp_indicator_const p hs c (or.inr hμs))
lemma indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_mem :
∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ s → indicator_const_Lp p hs hμs c x = c :=
indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn.mono (λ x hx hxs, hx.trans (set.indicator_of_mem hxs _))
lemma indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_nmem :
∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∉ s → indicator_const_Lp p hs hμs c x = 0 :=
indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn.mono (λ x hx hxs, hx.trans (set.indicator_of_not_mem hxs _))
lemma norm_indicator_const_Lp (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
∥indicator_const_Lp p hs hμs c∥ = ∥c∥ * (μ s).to_real ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
by rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn,
snorm_indicator_const hs hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ennreal.to_real_mul, ennreal.to_real_rpow,
ennreal.coe_to_real, coe_nnnorm]
lemma norm_indicator_const_Lp_top (hμs_ne_zero : μ s ≠ 0) : ∥indicator_const_Lp ∞ hs hμs c∥ = ∥c∥ :=
by rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn,
snorm_indicator_const' hs hμs_ne_zero ennreal.top_ne_zero, ennreal.top_to_real, div_zero,
ennreal.rpow_zero, mul_one, ennreal.coe_to_real, coe_nnnorm]
lemma norm_indicator_const_Lp' (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hμs_pos : μ s ≠ 0) :
∥indicator_const_Lp p hs hμs c∥ = ∥c∥ * (μ s).to_real ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
begin
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ rw [hp_top, ennreal.top_to_real, div_zero, real.rpow_zero, mul_one],
exact norm_indicator_const_Lp_top hμs_pos, },
{ exact norm_indicator_const_Lp hp_pos hp_top, },
end
@[simp] lemma indicator_const_empty :
indicator_const_Lp p measurable_set.empty (by simp : μ ∅ ≠ ∞) c = 0 :=
begin
rw Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero,
convert indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn,
simp [set.indicator_empty'],
end
lemma mem_ℒp_add_of_disjoint {f g : α → E}
(h : disjoint (support f) (support g)) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
mem_ℒp (f + g) p μ ↔ mem_ℒp f p μ ∧ mem_ℒp g p μ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hfg, ⟨_, _⟩, λ h, h.1.add h.2⟩,
{ rw ← indicator_add_eq_left h, exact hfg.indicator (measurable_set_support hf) },
{ rw ← indicator_add_eq_right h, exact hfg.indicator (measurable_set_support hg) }
end
/-- The indicator of a disjoint union of two sets is the sum of the indicators of the sets. -/
lemma indicator_const_Lp_disjoint_union {s t : set α} (hs : measurable_set s)
(ht : measurable_set t) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (hst : s ∩ t = ∅) (c : E) :
(indicator_const_Lp p (hs.union ht) ((measure_union_le s t).trans_lt
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ennreal.add_ne_top.mpr ⟨hμs, hμt⟩))).ne c)
= indicator_const_Lp p hs hμs c + indicator_const_Lp p ht hμt c :=
begin
ext1,
refine indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn.trans (eventually_eq.trans _ (Lp.coe_fn_add _ _).symm),
refine eventually_eq.trans _
(eventually_eq.add indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn.symm indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn.symm),
rw set.indicator_union_of_disjoint (set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst) _,
end
end indicator_const_Lp
end measure_theory
open measure_theory
/-!
### Composition on `L^p`
We show that Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `L^p`, and specialize
this to the composition with continuous linear maps, and to the definition of the positive
part of an `L^p` function.
-/
section composition
variables [second_countable_topology E] [borel_space E]
[second_countable_topology F] [measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
{g : E → F} {c : ℝ≥0}
namespace lipschitz_with
lemma mem_ℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz {α E F} {K K'} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
[measurable_space E] [measurable_space F] [normed_group E] [normed_group F] [borel_space E]
[borel_space F] [complete_space E]
{f : α → E} {g : E → F} (hg : lipschitz_with K g) (hg' : antilipschitz_with K' g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
mem_ℒp (g ∘ f) p μ ↔ mem_ℒp f p μ :=
begin
have := ae_measurable_comp_iff_of_closed_embedding g (hg'.closed_embedding hg.uniform_continuous),
split,
{ assume H,
have A : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ K' * ∥g (f x)∥,
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _),
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0],
apply hg'.le_mul_dist },
exact H.of_le_mul (this.1 H.ae_measurable) A },
{ assume H,
have A : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥g (f x)∥ ≤ K * ∥f x∥,
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _),
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0],
apply hg.dist_le_mul },
exact H.of_le_mul (this.2 H.ae_measurable) A }
end
/-- When `g` is a Lipschitz function sending `0` to `0` and `f` is in `Lp`, then `g ∘ f` is well
defined as an element of `Lp`. -/
def comp_Lp (hg : lipschitz_with c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) : Lp F p μ :=
⟨ae_eq_fun.comp g hg.continuous.measurable (f : α →ₘ[μ] E),
begin
suffices : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥ae_eq_fun.comp g hg.continuous.measurable (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) x∥ ≤ c * ∥f x∥,
{ exact Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul this },
filter_upwards [ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_comp g hg.continuous.measurable (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)],
assume a ha,
simp only [ha],
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0],
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) 0,
end⟩
lemma coe_fn_comp_Lp (hg : lipschitz_with c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) :
hg.comp_Lp g0 f =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_comp _ _ _
@[simp] lemma comp_Lp_zero (hg : lipschitz_with c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
hg.comp_Lp g0 (0 : Lp E p μ) = 0 :=
begin
rw Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero,
apply (coe_fn_comp_Lp _ _ _).trans,
filter_upwards [Lp.coe_fn_zero E p μ],
assume a ha,
simp [ha, g0]
end
lemma norm_comp_Lp_sub_le (hg : lipschitz_with c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f f' : Lp E p μ) :
∥hg.comp_Lp g0 f - hg.comp_Lp g0 f'∥ ≤ c * ∥f - f'∥ :=
begin
apply Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul,
filter_upwards [hg.coe_fn_comp_Lp g0 f, hg.coe_fn_comp_Lp g0 f',
Lp.coe_fn_sub (hg.comp_Lp g0 f) (hg.comp_Lp g0 f'), Lp.coe_fn_sub f f'],
assume a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4,
simp [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, ← dist_eq_norm],
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) (f' a)
end
lemma norm_comp_Lp_le (hg : lipschitz_with c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) :
∥hg.comp_Lp g0 f∥ ≤ c * ∥f∥ :=
by simpa using hg.norm_comp_Lp_sub_le g0 f 0
lemma lipschitz_with_comp_Lp [fact (1 ≤ p)] (hg : lipschitz_with c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
lipschitz_with c (hg.comp_Lp g0 : Lp E p μ → Lp F p μ) :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul $ λ f g, by simp [dist_eq_norm, norm_comp_Lp_sub_le]
lemma continuous_comp_Lp [fact (1 ≤ p)] (hg : lipschitz_with c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
continuous (hg.comp_Lp g0 : Lp E p μ → Lp F p μ) :=
(lipschitz_with_comp_Lp hg g0).continuous
end lipschitz_with
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
/-- Composing `f : Lp ` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def comp_Lp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : Lp F p μ :=
L.lipschitz.comp_Lp (map_zero L) f
lemma coe_fn_comp_Lp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (L.comp_Lp f) a = L (f a) :=
lipschitz_with.coe_fn_comp_Lp _ _ _
lemma norm_comp_Lp_le (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : ∥L.comp_Lp f∥ ≤ ∥L∥ * ∥f∥ :=
lipschitz_with.norm_comp_Lp_le _ _ _
variables (μ p) [measurable_space 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜]
/-- Composing `f : Lp E p μ` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`, seen as a `𝕜`-linear map on `Lp E p μ`. -/
def comp_Lpₗ (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : (Lp E p μ) →ₗ[𝕜] (Lp F p μ) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, L.comp_Lp f,
map_add' := begin
intros f g,
ext1,
filter_upwards [Lp.coe_fn_add f g, coe_fn_comp_Lp L (f + g), coe_fn_comp_Lp L f,
coe_fn_comp_Lp L g, Lp.coe_fn_add (L.comp_Lp f) (L.comp_Lp g)],
assume a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4 ha5,
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, ha5, map_add, pi.add_apply],
end,
map_smul' := begin
intros c f,
ext1,
filter_upwards [Lp.coe_fn_smul c f, coe_fn_comp_Lp L (c • f), Lp.coe_fn_smul c (L.comp_Lp f),
coe_fn_comp_Lp L f],
assume a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4,
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, map_smul, pi.smul_apply],
end }
/-- Composing `f : Lp E p μ` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`, seen as a continuous `𝕜`-linear map on
`Lp E p μ`. See also the similar
* `linear_map.comp_left` for functions,
* `continuous_linear_map.comp_left_continuous` for continuous functions,
* `continuous_linear_map.comp_left_continuous_bounded` for bounded continuous functions,
* `continuous_linear_map.comp_left_continuous_compact` for continuous functions on compact spaces.
-/
def comp_LpL [fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : (Lp E p μ) →L[𝕜] (Lp F p μ) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous (L.comp_Lpₗ p μ) ∥L∥ L.norm_comp_Lp_le
lemma norm_compLpL_le [fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) :
∥L.comp_LpL p μ∥ ≤ ∥L∥ :=
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _
end continuous_linear_map
namespace measure_theory
namespace Lp
section pos_part
lemma lipschitz_with_pos_part : lipschitz_with 1 (λ (x : ℝ), max x 0) :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul $ λ x y, by simp [dist, abs_max_sub_max_le_abs]
/-- Positive part of a function in `L^p`. -/
def pos_part (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : Lp ℝ p μ :=
lipschitz_with_pos_part.comp_Lp (max_eq_right (le_refl _)) f
/-- Negative part of a function in `L^p`. -/
def neg_part (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : Lp ℝ p μ := pos_part (-f)
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_pos_part (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : (pos_part f : α →ₘ[μ] ℝ) = (f : α →ₘ[μ] ℝ).pos_part := rfl
lemma coe_fn_pos_part (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ⇑(pos_part f) =ᵐ[μ] λ a, max (f a) 0 :=
ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_pos_part _
lemma coe_fn_neg_part_eq_max (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, neg_part f a = max (- f a) 0 :=
begin
rw neg_part,
filter_upwards [coe_fn_pos_part (-f), coe_fn_neg f],
assume a h₁ h₂,
rw [h₁, h₂, pi.neg_apply]
end
lemma coe_fn_neg_part (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, neg_part f a = - min (f a) 0 :=
(coe_fn_neg_part_eq_max f).mono $ assume a h,
by rw [h, ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
lemma continuous_pos_part [fact (1 ≤ p)] : continuous (λf : Lp ℝ p μ, pos_part f) :=
lipschitz_with.continuous_comp_Lp _ _
lemma continuous_neg_part [fact (1 ≤ p)] : continuous (λf : Lp ℝ p μ, neg_part f) :=
have eq : (λf : Lp ℝ p μ, neg_part f) = (λf : Lp ℝ p μ, pos_part (-f)) := rfl,
by { rw eq, exact continuous_pos_part.comp continuous_neg }
end pos_part
end Lp
end measure_theory
end composition
/-!
## `L^p` is a complete space
We show that `L^p` is a complete space for `1 ≤ p`.
-/
section complete_space
variables [borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E]
namespace measure_theory
namespace Lp
lemma snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf {ι} [nonempty ι] [linear_order ι] {f : ι → α → G} {p : ℝ}
(hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) {f_lim : α → G}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, f n x) at_top (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm' f_lim p μ = (∫⁻ a, at_top.liminf (λ m, (nnnorm (f m a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p) ∂μ) ^ (1/p) :=
begin
suffices h_no_pow : (∫⁻ a, (nnnorm (f_lim a)) ^ p ∂μ)
= (∫⁻ a, at_top.liminf (λ m, (nnnorm (f m a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p) ∂μ),
{ rw [snorm', h_no_pow], },
refine lintegral_congr_ae (h_lim.mono (λ a ha, _)),
rw tendsto.liminf_eq,
simp_rw [ennreal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hp_nonneg, ennreal.tendsto_coe],
refine ((nnreal.continuous_rpow_const hp_nonneg).tendsto (nnnorm (f_lim a))).comp _,
exact (continuous_nnnorm.tendsto (f_lim a)).comp ha,
end
lemma snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm' {E} [measurable_space E]
[normed_group E] [borel_space E] {f : ℕ → α → E} {p : ℝ} (hp_pos : 0 < p)
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) {f_lim : α → E}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, f n x) at_top (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm' f_lim p μ ≤ at_top.liminf (λ n, snorm' (f n) p μ) :=
begin
rw snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf hp_pos.le h_lim,
rw [←ennreal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p), one_div_one_div],
refine (lintegral_liminf_le' (λ m, ((hf m).ennnorm.pow_const _))).trans_eq _,
have h_pow_liminf : at_top.liminf (λ n, snorm' (f n) p μ) ^ p
= at_top.liminf (λ n, (snorm' (f n) p μ) ^ p),
{ have h_rpow_mono := ennreal.rpow_left_strict_mono_of_pos hp_pos,
have h_rpow_surj := (ennreal.rpow_left_bijective hp_pos.ne.symm).2,
refine (h_rpow_mono.order_iso_of_surjective _ h_rpow_surj).liminf_apply _ _ _ _,
all_goals { is_bounded_default }, },
rw h_pow_liminf,
simp_rw [snorm', ← ennreal.rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel hp_pos.ne.symm, ennreal.rpow_one],
end
lemma snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_ess_sup_liminf {ι} [nonempty ι] [linear_order ι] {f : ι → α → G}
{f_lim : α → G}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, f n x) at_top (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim ∞ μ = ess_sup (λ x, at_top.liminf (λ m, (nnnorm (f m x) : ℝ≥0∞))) μ :=
begin
rw [snorm_exponent_top, snorm_ess_sup],
refine ess_sup_congr_ae (h_lim.mono (λ x hx, _)),
rw tendsto.liminf_eq,
rw ennreal.tendsto_coe,
exact (continuous_nnnorm.tendsto (f_lim x)).comp hx,
end
lemma snorm_exponent_top_lim_le_liminf_snorm_exponent_top {ι} [nonempty ι] [encodable ι]
[linear_order ι] {f : ι → α → F} {f_lim : α → F}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, f n x) at_top (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim ∞ μ ≤ at_top.liminf (λ n, snorm (f n) ∞ μ) :=
begin
rw snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_ess_sup_liminf h_lim,
simp_rw [snorm_exponent_top, snorm_ess_sup],
exact ennreal.ess_sup_liminf_le (λ n, (λ x, (nnnorm (f n x) : ℝ≥0∞))),
end
lemma snorm_lim_le_liminf_snorm {E} [measurable_space E] [normed_group E] [borel_space E]
{f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) (f_lim : α → E)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, f n x) at_top (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim p μ ≤ at_top.liminf (λ n, snorm (f n) p μ) :=
begin
by_cases hp0 : p = 0,
{ simp [hp0], },
rw ← ne.def at hp0,
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ simp_rw [hp_top],
exact snorm_exponent_top_lim_le_liminf_snorm_exponent_top h_lim, },
simp_rw snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top,
have hp_pos : 0 < p.to_real,
from ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mpr ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) hp0.symm, hp_top⟩,
exact snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm' hp_pos hf h_lim,
end
/-! ### `Lp` is complete iff Cauchy sequences of `ℒp` have limits in `ℒp` -/
lemma tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp' {ι} {fi : filter ι} [fact (1 ≤ p)]
(f : ι → Lp E p μ) (f_lim : Lp E p μ) :
fi.tendsto f (𝓝 f_lim) ↔ fi.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rw tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero,
simp_rw dist_def,
rw [← ennreal.zero_to_real, ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff (λ n, _) ennreal.zero_ne_top],
rw snorm_congr_ae (Lp.coe_fn_sub _ _).symm,
exact Lp.snorm_ne_top _,
end
lemma tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp {ι} {fi : filter ι} [fact (1 ≤ p)]
(f : ι → Lp E p μ) (f_lim : α → E) (f_lim_ℒp : mem_ℒp f_lim p μ) :
fi.tendsto f (𝓝 (f_lim_ℒp.to_Lp f_lim)) ↔ fi.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rw tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp',
suffices h_eq : (λ n, snorm (f n - mem_ℒp.to_Lp f_lim f_lim_ℒp) p μ)
= (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ),
by rw h_eq,
exact funext (λ n, snorm_congr_ae (eventually_eq.rfl.sub (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp f_lim_ℒp))),
end
lemma tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp'' {ι} {fi : filter ι} [fact (1 ≤ p)]
(f : ι → α → E) (f_ℒp : ∀ n, mem_ℒp (f n) p μ) (f_lim : α → E) (f_lim_ℒp : mem_ℒp f_lim p μ) :
fi.tendsto (λ n, (f_ℒp n).to_Lp (f n)) (𝓝 (f_lim_ℒp.to_Lp f_lim))
↔ fi.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) :=
begin
convert Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp' _ _,
ext1 n,
apply snorm_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [((f_ℒp n).sub f_lim_ℒp).coe_fn_to_Lp,
Lp.coe_fn_sub ((f_ℒp n).to_Lp (f n)) (f_lim_ℒp.to_Lp f_lim)],
intros x hx₁ hx₂,
rw ← hx₂,
exact hx₁.symm
end
lemma tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ℒp {ι} {fi : filter ι} [hp : fact (1 ≤ p)]
{f : ι → Lp E p μ} (f_lim : α → E) (f_lim_ℒp : mem_ℒp f_lim p μ)
(h_tendsto : fi.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0)) :
fi.tendsto f (𝓝 (f_lim_ℒp.to_Lp f_lim)) :=
(tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp f f_lim f_lim_ℒp).mpr h_tendsto
lemma cauchy_seq_Lp_iff_cauchy_seq_ℒp {ι} [nonempty ι] [semilattice_sup ι] [hp : fact (1 ≤ p)]
(f : ι → Lp E p μ) :
cauchy_seq f ↔ tendsto (λ (n : ι × ι), snorm (f n.fst - f n.snd) p μ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
simp_rw [cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto_dist_at_top_0, dist_def],
rw [← ennreal.zero_to_real, ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff (λ n, _) ennreal.zero_ne_top],
rw snorm_congr_ae (Lp.coe_fn_sub _ _).symm,
exact snorm_ne_top _,
end
lemma complete_space_Lp_of_cauchy_complete_ℒp [hp : fact (1 ≤ p)]
(H : ∀ (f : ℕ → α → E) (hf : ∀ n, mem_ℒp (f n) p μ) (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∑' i, B i < ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ (N n m : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N),
∃ (f_lim : α → E) (hf_lim_meas : mem_ℒp f_lim p μ),
at_top.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0)) :
complete_space (Lp E p μ) :=
begin
let B := λ n : ℕ, ((1:ℝ) / 2) ^ n,
have hB_pos : ∀ n, 0 < B n, from λ n, pow_pos (div_pos zero_lt_one zero_lt_two) n,
refine metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences B hB_pos (λ f hf, _),
suffices h_limit : ∃ (f_lim : α → E) (hf_lim_meas : mem_ℒp f_lim p μ),
at_top.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0),
{ rcases h_limit with ⟨f_lim, hf_lim_meas, h_tendsto⟩,
exact ⟨hf_lim_meas.to_Lp f_lim, tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ℒp f_lim hf_lim_meas h_tendsto⟩, },
have hB : summable B, from summable_geometric_two,
cases hB with M hB,
let B1 := λ n, ennreal.of_real (B n),
have hB1_has : has_sum B1 (ennreal.of_real M),
{ have h_tsum_B1 : ∑' i, B1 i = (ennreal.of_real M),
{ change (∑' (n : ℕ), ennreal.of_real (B n)) = ennreal.of_real M,
rw ←hB.tsum_eq,
exact (ennreal.of_real_tsum_of_nonneg (λ n, le_of_lt (hB_pos n)) hB.summable).symm, },
have h_sum := (@ennreal.summable _ B1).has_sum,
rwa h_tsum_B1 at h_sum, },
have hB1 : ∑' i, B1 i < ∞, by {rw hB1_has.tsum_eq, exact ennreal.of_real_lt_top, },
let f1 : ℕ → α → E := λ n, f n,
refine H f1 (λ n, Lp.mem_ℒp (f n)) B1 hB1 (λ N n m hn hm, _),
specialize hf N n m hn hm,
rw dist_def at hf,
simp_rw [f1, B1],
rwa ennreal.lt_of_real_iff_to_real_lt,
rw snorm_congr_ae (Lp.coe_fn_sub _ _).symm,
exact Lp.snorm_ne_top _,
end
/-! ### Prove that controlled Cauchy sequences of `ℒp` have limits in `ℒp` -/
private lemma snorm'_sum_norm_sub_le_tsum_of_cauchy_snorm' {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) {p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p)
{B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (h_cau : ∀ (N n m : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm' (f n - f m) p μ < B N) (n : ℕ) :
snorm' (λ x, ∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), norm (f (i + 1) x - f i x)) p μ ≤ ∑' i, B i :=
begin
let f_norm_diff := λ i x, norm (f (i + 1) x - f i x),
have hgf_norm_diff : ∀ n, (λ x, ∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), norm (f (i + 1) x - f i x))
= ∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), f_norm_diff i,
from λ n, funext (λ x, by simp [f_norm_diff]),
rw hgf_norm_diff,
refine (snorm'_sum_le (λ i _, ((hf (i+1)).sub (hf i)).norm) hp1).trans _,
simp_rw [←pi.sub_apply, snorm'_norm],
refine (finset.sum_le_sum _).trans (sum_le_tsum _ (λ m _, zero_le _) ennreal.summable),
exact λ m _, (h_cau m (m + 1) m (nat.le_succ m) (le_refl m)).le,
end
private lemma lintegral_rpow_sum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_rpow_tsum {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) {p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (n : ℕ)
(hn : snorm' (λ x, ∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), norm (f (i + 1) x - f i x)) p μ ≤ ∑' i, B i) :
∫⁻ a, (∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ
≤ (∑' i, B i) ^ p :=
begin
have hp_pos : 0 < p := zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1,
rw [←one_div_one_div p, @ennreal.le_rpow_one_div_iff _ _ (1/p) (by simp [hp_pos]),
one_div_one_div p],
simp_rw snorm' at hn,
have h_nnnorm_nonneg :
(λ a, (nnnorm (∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), ∥f (i + 1) a - f i a∥) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p)
= λ a, (∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), (nnnorm(f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)) ^ p,
{ ext1 a,
congr,
simp_rw ←of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm,
rw ←ennreal.of_real_sum_of_nonneg,
{ rw real.norm_of_nonneg _,
exact finset.sum_nonneg (λ x hx, norm_nonneg _), },
{ exact λ x hx, norm_nonneg _, }, },
change (∫⁻ a, (λ x, ↑(nnnorm (∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), ∥f (i+1) x - f i x∥))^p) a ∂μ)^(1/p)
≤ ∑' i, B i at hn,
rwa h_nnnorm_nonneg at hn,
end
private lemma lintegral_rpow_tsum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_tsum {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) {p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, (∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ
≤ (∑' i, B i) ^ p) :
(∫⁻ a, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ ∑' i, B i :=
begin
have hp_pos : 0 < p := zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1,
suffices h_pow : ∫⁻ a, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ ≤ (∑' i, B i) ^ p,
by rwa [←ennreal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p), one_div_one_div],
have h_tsum_1 : ∀ g : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞,
∑' i, g i = at_top.liminf (λ n, ∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), g i),
by { intro g, rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat, ← liminf_nat_add _ 1], },
simp_rw h_tsum_1 _,
rw ← h_tsum_1,
have h_liminf_pow : ∫⁻ a, at_top.liminf (λ n, ∑ i in finset.range (n + 1),
(nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a)))^p ∂μ
= ∫⁻ a, at_top.liminf (λ n, (∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), (nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a)))^p) ∂μ,
{ refine lintegral_congr (λ x, _),
have h_rpow_mono := ennreal.rpow_left_strict_mono_of_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1),
have h_rpow_surj := (ennreal.rpow_left_bijective hp_pos.ne.symm).2,
refine (h_rpow_mono.order_iso_of_surjective _ h_rpow_surj).liminf_apply _ _ _ _,
all_goals { is_bounded_default }, },
rw h_liminf_pow,
refine (lintegral_liminf_le' _).trans _,
{ exact λ n, (finset.ae_measurable_sum (finset.range (n+1))
(λ i _, ((hf (i+1)).sub (hf i)).ennnorm)).pow_const _, },
{ exact liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (frequently_of_forall h), },
end
private lemma tsum_nnnorm_sub_ae_lt_top
{f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) {p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hB : ∑' i, B i < ∞)
(h : (∫⁻ a, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ ∑' i, B i) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) x - f i x) : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞ :=
begin
have hp_pos : 0 < p := zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1,
have h_integral : ∫⁻ a, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ < ∞,
{ have h_tsum_lt_top : (∑' i, B i) ^ p < ∞,
from ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg hp_pos.le (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hB),
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ h_tsum_lt_top,
rwa [←ennreal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p), one_div_one_div] at h, },
have rpow_ae_lt_top : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) x - f i x) : ℝ≥0∞)^p < ∞,
{ refine ae_lt_top' (ae_measurable.pow_const _ _) h_integral,
exact ae_measurable.ennreal_tsum (λ n, ((hf (n+1)).sub (hf n)).ennnorm), },
refine rpow_ae_lt_top.mono (λ x hx, _),
rwa [←ennreal.lt_rpow_one_div_iff hp_pos,
ennreal.top_rpow_of_pos (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p)] at hx,
end
lemma ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm' [complete_space E] {f : ℕ → α → E} {p : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i < ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ (N n m : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm' (f n - f m) p μ < B N) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : E, at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 l) :=
begin
have h_summable : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, summable (λ (i : ℕ), f (i + 1) x - f i x),
{ have h1 : ∀ n, snorm' (λ x, ∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), norm (f (i + 1) x - f i x)) p μ
≤ ∑' i, B i,
from snorm'_sum_norm_sub_le_tsum_of_cauchy_snorm' hf hp1 h_cau,
have h2 : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, (∑ i in finset.range (n + 1), nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ
≤ (∑' i, B i) ^ p,
from λ n, lintegral_rpow_sum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_rpow_tsum hf hp1 n (h1 n),
have h3 : (∫⁻ a, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) a - f i a) : ℝ≥0∞)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ ∑' i, B i,
from lintegral_rpow_tsum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_tsum hf hp1 h2,
have h4 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (∑' i, nnnorm (f (i + 1) x - f i x) : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞,
from tsum_nnnorm_sub_ae_lt_top hf hp1 hB h3,
exact h4.mono (λ x hx, summable_of_summable_nnnorm
(ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.mp (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hx))), },
have h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : E,
at_top.tendsto (λ n, ∑ i in finset.range n, (f (i + 1) x - f i x)) (𝓝 l),
{ refine h_summable.mono (λ x hx, _),
let hx_sum := hx.has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat,
exact ⟨∑' i, (f (i + 1) x - f i x), hx_sum⟩, },
refine h.mono (λ x hx, _),
cases hx with l hx,
have h_rw_sum : (λ n, ∑ i in finset.range n, (f (i + 1) x - f i x)) = λ n, f n x - f 0 x,
{ ext1 n,
change ∑ (i : ℕ) in finset.range n, ((λ m, f m x) (i + 1) - (λ m, f m x) i) = f n x - f 0 x,
rw finset.sum_range_sub, },
rw h_rw_sum at hx,
have hf_rw : (λ n, f n x) = λ n, f n x - f 0 x + f 0 x, by { ext1 n, abel, },
rw hf_rw,
exact ⟨l + f 0 x, tendsto.add_const _ hx⟩,
end
lemma ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm [complete_space E] {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i < ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ (N n m : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : E, at_top.tendsto (λ n, f n x) (𝓝 l) :=
begin
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞,
{ simp_rw [hp_top] at *,
have h_cau_ae : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ N n m, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → (nnnorm ((f n - f m) x) : ℝ≥0∞) < B N,
{ simp_rw [ae_all_iff, ae_imp_iff],
exact λ N n m hnN hmN, ae_lt_of_ess_sup_lt (h_cau N n m hnN hmN), },
simp_rw [snorm_exponent_top, snorm_ess_sup] at h_cau,
refine h_cau_ae.mono (λ x hx, cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete _),
refine cauchy_seq_of_le_tendsto_0 (λ n, (B n).to_real) _ _,
{ intros n m N hnN hmN,
specialize hx N n m hnN hmN,
rw [dist_eq_norm, ←ennreal.to_real_of_real (norm_nonneg _),
ennreal.to_real_le_to_real ennreal.of_real_ne_top
((ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hB)) N)],
rw ←of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm at hx,
exact hx.le, },
{ rw ← ennreal.zero_to_real,
exact tendsto.comp (ennreal.tendsto_to_real ennreal.zero_ne_top)
(ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero_of_tsum_lt_top hB), }, },
have hp1 : 1 ≤ p.to_real,
{ rw [← ennreal.of_real_le_iff_le_to_real hp_top, ennreal.of_real_one],
exact hp, },
have h_cau' : ∀ (N n m : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm' (f n - f m) (p.to_real) μ < B N,
{ intros N n m hn hm,
specialize h_cau N n m hn hm,
rwa snorm_eq_snorm' (ennreal.zero_lt_one.trans_le hp).ne.symm hp_top at h_cau, },
exact ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm' hf hp1 hB h_cau',
end
lemma cauchy_tendsto_of_tendsto {f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, ae_measurable (f n) μ)
(f_lim : α → E) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hB : ∑' i, B i < ∞) (h_cau : ∀ (N n m : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, f n x) at_top (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
at_top.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rw ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero,
intros ε hε,
have h_B : ∃ (N : ℕ), B N ≤ ε,
{ suffices h_tendsto_zero : ∃ (N : ℕ), ∀ n : ℕ, N ≤ n → B n ≤ ε,
from ⟨h_tendsto_zero.some, h_tendsto_zero.some_spec _ (le_refl _)⟩,
exact (ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero.mp (ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero_of_tsum_lt_top hB))
ε hε, },
cases h_B with N h_B,
refine ⟨N, λ n hn, _⟩,
have h_sub : snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ ≤ at_top.liminf (λ m, snorm (f n - f m) p μ),
{ refine snorm_lim_le_liminf_snorm (λ m, (hf n).sub (hf m)) (f n - f_lim) _,
refine h_lim.mono (λ x hx, _),
simp_rw sub_eq_add_neg,
exact tendsto.add tendsto_const_nhds (tendsto.neg hx), },
refine h_sub.trans _,
refine liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (frequently_at_top.mpr _),
refine λ N1, ⟨max N N1, le_max_right _ _, _⟩,
exact (h_cau N n (max N N1) hn (le_max_left _ _)).le.trans h_B,
end
lemma mem_ℒp_of_cauchy_tendsto (hp : 1 ≤ p) {f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, mem_ℒp (f n) p μ)
(f_lim : α → E) (h_lim_meas : ae_measurable f_lim μ)
(h_tendsto : at_top.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0)) :
mem_ℒp f_lim p μ :=
begin
refine ⟨h_lim_meas, _⟩,
rw ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero at h_tendsto,
cases (h_tendsto 1 ennreal.zero_lt_one) with N h_tendsto_1,
specialize h_tendsto_1 N (le_refl N),
have h_add : f_lim = f_lim - f N + f N, by abel,
rw h_add,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_add_le (h_lim_meas.sub (hf N).1) (hf N).1 hp) _,
rw ennreal.add_lt_top,
split,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ ennreal.one_lt_top,
have h_neg : f_lim - f N = -(f N - f_lim), by simp,
rwa [h_neg, snorm_neg], },
{ exact (hf N).2, },
end
lemma cauchy_complete_ℒp [complete_space E] (hp : 1 ≤ p)
{f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, mem_ℒp (f n) p μ) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i < ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ (N n m : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N) :
∃ (f_lim : α → E) (hf_lim_meas : mem_ℒp f_lim p μ),
at_top.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) :=
begin
obtain ⟨f_lim, h_f_lim_meas, h_lim⟩ : ∃ (f_lim : α → E) (hf_lim_meas : measurable f_lim),
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, f n x) at_top (nhds (f_lim x)),
from measurable_limit_of_tendsto_metric_ae (λ n, (hf n).1)
(ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm (λ n, (hf n).1) hp hB h_cau),
have h_tendsto' : at_top.tendsto (λ n, snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0),
from cauchy_tendsto_of_tendsto (λ m, (hf m).1) f_lim hB h_cau h_lim,
have h_ℒp_lim : mem_ℒp f_lim p μ,
from mem_ℒp_of_cauchy_tendsto hp hf f_lim h_f_lim_meas.ae_measurable h_tendsto',
exact ⟨f_lim, h_ℒp_lim, h_tendsto'⟩,
end
/-! ### `Lp` is complete for `1 ≤ p` -/
instance [complete_space E] [hp : fact (1 ≤ p)] : complete_space (Lp E p μ) :=
complete_space_Lp_of_cauchy_complete_ℒp (λ f hf B hB h_cau, cauchy_complete_ℒp hp.elim hf hB h_cau)
end Lp
end measure_theory
end complete_space
/-! ### Continuous functions in `Lp` -/
open_locale bounded_continuous_function
open bounded_continuous_function
variables [borel_space E] [second_countable_topology E] [topological_space α] [borel_space α]
variables (E p μ)
/-- An additive subgroup of `Lp E p μ`, consisting of the equivalence classes which contain a
bounded continuous representative. -/
def measure_theory.Lp.bounded_continuous_function : add_subgroup (Lp E p μ) :=
add_subgroup.add_subgroup_of
((continuous_map.to_ae_eq_fun_add_hom μ).comp (forget_boundedness_add_hom α E)).range
(Lp E p μ)
variables {E p μ}
/-- By definition, the elements of `Lp.bounded_continuous_function E p μ` are the elements of
`Lp E p μ` which contain a bounded continuous representative. -/
lemma measure_theory.Lp.mem_bounded_continuous_function_iff {f : (Lp E p μ)} :
f ∈ measure_theory.Lp.bounded_continuous_function E p μ
↔ ∃ f₀ : (α →ᵇ E), f₀.to_continuous_map.to_ae_eq_fun μ = (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) :=
add_subgroup.mem_add_subgroup_of
namespace bounded_continuous_function
variables [finite_measure μ]
/-- A bounded continuous function on a finite-measure space is in `Lp`. -/
lemma mem_Lp (f : α →ᵇ E) :
f.to_continuous_map.to_ae_eq_fun μ ∈ Lp E p μ :=
begin
refine Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound (∥f∥) _,
filter_upwards [f.to_continuous_map.coe_fn_to_ae_eq_fun μ],
intros x hx,
convert f.norm_coe_le_norm x
end
/-- The `Lp`-norm of a bounded continuous function is at most a constant (depending on the measure
of the whole space) times its sup-norm. -/
lemma Lp_norm_le (f : α →ᵇ E) :
∥(⟨f.to_continuous_map.to_ae_eq_fun μ, mem_Lp f⟩ : Lp E p μ)∥
≤ (measure_univ_nnreal μ) ^ (p.to_real)⁻¹ * ∥f∥ :=
begin
apply Lp.norm_le_of_ae_bound (norm_nonneg f),
{ refine (f.to_continuous_map.coe_fn_to_ae_eq_fun μ).mono _,
intros x hx,
convert f.norm_coe_le_norm x },
{ apply_instance }
end
variables (p μ)
/-- The normed group homomorphism of considering a bounded continuous function on a finite-measure
space as an element of `Lp`. -/
def to_Lp_hom [fact (1 ≤ p)] : normed_group_hom (α →ᵇ E) (Lp E p μ) :=
{ bound' := ⟨_, Lp_norm_le⟩,
.. add_monoid_hom.cod_restrict
((continuous_map.to_ae_eq_fun_add_hom μ).comp (forget_boundedness_add_hom α E))
(Lp E p μ)
mem_Lp }
lemma range_to_Lp_hom [fact (1 ≤ p)] :
((to_Lp_hom p μ).range : add_subgroup (Lp E p μ))
= measure_theory.Lp.bounded_continuous_function E p μ :=
begin
symmetry,
convert add_monoid_hom.add_subgroup_of_range_eq_of_le
((continuous_map.to_ae_eq_fun_add_hom μ).comp (forget_boundedness_add_hom α E))
(by { rintros - ⟨f, rfl⟩, exact mem_Lp f } : _ ≤ Lp E p μ),
end
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [measurable_space 𝕜]
/-- The bounded linear map of considering a bounded continuous function on a finite-measure space
as an element of `Lp`. -/
def to_Lp [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [fact (1 ≤ p)] :
(α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] (Lp E p μ) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
(linear_map.cod_restrict
(Lp.Lp_submodule E p μ 𝕜)
((continuous_map.to_ae_eq_fun_linear_map μ).comp (forget_boundedness_linear_map α E 𝕜))
mem_Lp)
_
Lp_norm_le
variables {𝕜}
lemma range_to_Lp [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [fact (1 ≤ p)] :
((to_Lp p μ 𝕜).range.to_add_subgroup : add_subgroup (Lp E p μ))
= measure_theory.Lp.bounded_continuous_function E p μ :=
range_to_Lp_hom p μ
variables {p}
lemma coe_fn_to_Lp [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [fact (1 ≤ p)]
(f : α →ᵇ E) :
to_Lp p μ 𝕜 f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_mk f _
lemma to_Lp_norm_le [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
[fact (1 ≤ p)] :
∥(to_Lp p μ 𝕜 : (α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] (Lp E p μ))∥ ≤ (measure_univ_nnreal μ) ^ (p.to_real)⁻¹ :=
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ ((measure_univ_nnreal μ) ^ (p.to_real)⁻¹).coe_nonneg _
end bounded_continuous_function
namespace continuous_map
variables [compact_space α] [finite_measure μ]
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [measurable_space 𝕜] (p μ) [fact (1 ≤ p)]
/-- The bounded linear map of considering a continuous function on a compact finite-measure
space `α` as an element of `Lp`. By definition, the norm on `C(α, E)` is the sup-norm, transferred
from the space `α →ᵇ E` of bounded continuous functions, so this construction is just a matter of
transferring the structure from `bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp` along the isometry. -/
def to_Lp [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] :
C(α, E) →L[𝕜] (Lp E p μ) :=
(bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp p μ 𝕜).comp
(linear_isometry_bounded_of_compact α E 𝕜).to_linear_isometry.to_continuous_linear_map
variables {𝕜}
lemma range_to_Lp [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] :
((to_Lp p μ 𝕜).range.to_add_subgroup : add_subgroup (Lp E p μ))
= measure_theory.Lp.bounded_continuous_function E p μ :=
begin
refine set_like.ext' _,
have := (linear_isometry_bounded_of_compact α E 𝕜).surjective,
convert function.surjective.range_comp this (bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp p μ 𝕜),
rw ← bounded_continuous_function.range_to_Lp p μ,
refl,
end
variables {p}
lemma coe_fn_to_Lp [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] (f : C(α, E)) :
to_Lp p μ 𝕜 f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_mk f _
lemma to_Lp_def [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] (f : C(α, E)) :
to_Lp p μ 𝕜 f
= bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp p μ 𝕜 (linear_isometry_bounded_of_compact α E 𝕜 f) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_Lp_comp_forget_boundedness [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜]
[normed_space 𝕜 E] (f : α →ᵇ E) :
to_Lp p μ 𝕜 (bounded_continuous_function.forget_boundedness α E f)
= bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp p μ 𝕜 f :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_Lp [normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
(f : C(α, E)) :
(to_Lp p μ 𝕜 f : α →ₘ[μ] E) = f.to_ae_eq_fun μ :=
rfl
variables [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [opens_measurable_space 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
lemma to_Lp_norm_eq_to_Lp_norm_coe :
∥(to_Lp p μ 𝕜 : C(α, E) →L[𝕜] (Lp E p μ))∥
= ∥(bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp p μ 𝕜 : (α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] (Lp E p μ))∥ :=
continuous_linear_map.op_norm_comp_linear_isometry_equiv _ _
/-- Bound for the operator norm of `continuous_map.to_Lp`. -/
lemma to_Lp_norm_le :
∥(to_Lp p μ 𝕜 : C(α, E) →L[𝕜] (Lp E p μ))∥ ≤ (measure_univ_nnreal μ) ^ (p.to_real)⁻¹ :=
by { rw to_Lp_norm_eq_to_Lp_norm_coe, exact bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp_norm_le μ }
end continuous_map
--(to_Lp p μ 𝕜 : (α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] (Lp E p μ))
|
55bebd02c42cf0a66e97cec8dcd9f00e975f8912 | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/data/polynomial/monic.lean | 77cad7c1143cfa71dfa21dc192a04f147e13a001 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,558 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.reverse
import algebra.regular.smul
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`monic.mul`, `monic.map`, `monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open finset
open_locale big_operators classical polynomial
namespace polynomial
universes u v y
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
lemma monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
lemma not_monic_zero_iff : ¬ monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
lemma monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ (∀ a b : R, a = b) :=
polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans ⟨by { introI, simp },
λ h, subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
lemma monic.as_sum (hp : p.monic) :
p = X^(p.nat_degree) + (∑ i in range p.nat_degree, C (p.coeff i) * X^i) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm] },
suffices : C (p.coeff p.nat_degree) = 1,
{ rw [this, one_mul] },
exact congr_arg C hp
end
lemma ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : monic q) : q ≠ 0 :=
begin
rintro rfl,
rw [monic.def, leading_coeff_zero] at hq,
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp,
exact hp rfl
end
lemma monic.map [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : monic p) : monic (p.map f) :=
begin
nontriviality,
have : f (leading_coeff p) ≠ 0,
{ rw [show _ = _, from hp, f.map_one],
exact one_ne_zero, },
rw [monic, leading_coeff, coeff_map],
suffices : p.coeff (map f p).nat_degree = 1,
{ simp [this], },
rwa nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero f this),
end
lemma monic_C_mul_of_mul_leading_coeff_eq_one {b : R} (hp : b * p.leading_coeff = 1) :
monic (C b * p) :=
by { nontriviality, rw [monic, leading_coeff_mul' _]; simp [leading_coeff_C b, hp] }
lemma monic_mul_C_of_leading_coeff_mul_eq_one {b : R} (hp : p.leading_coeff * b = 1) :
monic (p * C b) :=
by { nontriviality, rw [monic, leading_coeff_mul' _]; simp [leading_coeff_C b, hp] }
theorem monic_of_degree_le (n : ℕ) (H1 : degree p ≤ n) (H2 : coeff p n = 1) : monic p :=
decidable.by_cases
(assume H : degree p < n, eq_of_zero_eq_one
(H2 ▸ (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H).symm) _ _)
(assume H : ¬degree p < n,
by rwa [monic, leading_coeff, nat_degree, (lt_or_eq_of_le H1).resolve_left H])
theorem monic_X_pow_add {n : ℕ} (H : degree p ≤ n) : monic (X ^ (n+1) + p) :=
have H1 : degree p < n+1, from lt_of_le_of_lt H (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.2 (nat.lt_succ_self n)),
monic_of_degree_le (n+1)
(le_trans (degree_add_le _ _) (max_le (degree_X_pow_le _) (le_of_lt H1)))
(by rw [coeff_add, coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H1, add_zero])
theorem monic_X_add_C (x : R) : monic (X + C x) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ monic_X_pow_add degree_C_le
lemma monic.mul (hp : monic p) (hq : monic q) : monic (p * q) :=
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then by haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0;
exact subsingleton.elim _ _
else
have leading_coeff p * leading_coeff q ≠ 0, by simp [monic.def.1 hp, monic.def.1 hq, ne.symm h0],
by rw [monic.def, leading_coeff_mul' this, monic.def.1 hp, monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
lemma monic.pow (hp : monic p) : ∀ (n : ℕ), monic (p ^ n)
| 0 := monic_one
| (n+1) := by { rw pow_succ, exact hp.mul (monic.pow n) }
lemma monic.add_of_left (hp : monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) :
monic (p + q) :=
by rwa [monic, add_comm, leading_coeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
lemma monic.add_of_right (hq : monic q) (hpq : degree p < degree q) :
monic (p + q) :=
by rwa [monic, leading_coeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
lemma monic.of_mul_monic_left (hp : p.monic) (hpq : (p * q).monic) : q.monic :=
begin
contrapose! hpq,
rw monic.def at hpq ⊢,
rwa leading_coeff_monic_mul hp,
end
lemma monic.of_mul_monic_right (hq : q.monic) (hpq : (p * q).monic) : p.monic :=
begin
contrapose! hpq,
rw monic.def at hpq ⊢,
rwa leading_coeff_mul_monic hq,
end
namespace monic
@[simp]
lemma nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.monic) :
p.nat_degree = 0 ↔ p = 1 :=
begin
split; intro h,
swap, { rw h, exact nat_degree_one },
have : p = C (p.coeff 0),
{ rw ← polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff,
rwa polynomial.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero at h },
rw this, convert C_1, rw ← h, apply hp,
end
@[simp]
lemma degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.monic) :
p.degree ≤ 0 ↔ p = 1 :=
by rw [←hp.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
lemma nat_degree_mul (hp : p.monic) (hq : q.monic) :
(p * q).nat_degree = p.nat_degree + q.nat_degree :=
begin
nontriviality R,
apply nat_degree_mul',
simp [hp.leading_coeff, hq.leading_coeff]
end
lemma degree_mul_comm (hp : p.monic) (q : R[X]) :
(p * q).degree = (q * p).degree :=
begin
by_cases h : q = 0,
{ simp [h] },
rw [degree_mul', hp.degree_mul],
{ exact add_comm _ _ },
{ rwa [hp.leading_coeff, one_mul, leading_coeff_ne_zero] }
end
lemma nat_degree_mul' (hp : p.monic) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).nat_degree = p.nat_degree + q.nat_degree :=
begin
rw [nat_degree_mul', add_comm],
simpa [hp.leading_coeff, leading_coeff_ne_zero]
end
lemma nat_degree_mul_comm (hp : p.monic) (q : R[X]) :
(p * q).nat_degree = (q * p).nat_degree :=
begin
by_cases h : q = 0,
{ simp [h] },
rw [hp.nat_degree_mul' h, polynomial.nat_degree_mul', add_comm],
simpa [hp.leading_coeff, leading_coeff_ne_zero]
end
lemma not_dvd_of_nat_degree_lt (hp : monic p)
(h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : nat_degree q < nat_degree p) : ¬ p ∣ q :=
begin
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩,
rw [hp.nat_degree_mul' $ right_ne_zero_of_mul h0] at hl,
exact hl.not_le (nat.le_add_right _ _)
end
lemma not_dvd_of_degree_lt (hp : monic p)
(h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : degree q < degree p) : ¬ p ∣ q :=
monic.not_dvd_of_nat_degree_lt hp h0 $ nat_degree_lt_nat_degree h0 hl
lemma next_coeff_mul (hp : monic p) (hq : monic q) :
next_coeff (p * q) = next_coeff p + next_coeff q :=
begin
nontriviality,
simp only [← coeff_one_reverse],
rw reverse_mul;
simp [coeff_mul, nat.antidiagonal, hp.leading_coeff, hq.leading_coeff, add_comm]
end
lemma eq_one_of_map_eq_one {S : Type*} [semiring S] [nontrivial S]
(f : R →+* S) (hp : p.monic) (map_eq : p.map f = 1) : p = 1 :=
begin
nontriviality R,
have hdeg : p.degree = 0,
{ rw [← degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero f _, map_eq, degree_one],
{ rw [hp.leading_coeff, f.map_one],
exact one_ne_zero } },
have hndeg : p.nat_degree = 0 :=
with_bot.coe_eq_coe.mp ((degree_eq_nat_degree hp.ne_zero).symm.trans hdeg),
convert eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg,
rw [← hndeg, ← polynomial.leading_coeff, hp.leading_coeff, C.map_one]
end
lemma nat_degree_pow (hp : p.monic) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).nat_degree = n * p.nat_degree :=
begin
induction n with n hn,
{ simp },
{ rw [pow_succ, hp.nat_degree_mul (hp.pow n), hn],
ring }
end
end monic
@[simp] lemma nat_degree_pow_X_add_C [nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) (r : R) :
((X + C r) ^ n).nat_degree = n :=
by rw [(monic_X_add_C r).nat_degree_pow, nat_degree_X_add_C, mul_one]
lemma monic.eq_one_of_is_unit (hm : monic p) (hpu : is_unit p) : p = 1 :=
begin
nontriviality R,
obtain ⟨q, h⟩ := hpu.exists_right_inv,
have := hm.nat_degree_mul' (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h),
rw [h, nat_degree_one, eq_comm, add_eq_zero_iff] at this,
exact hm.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one.mp this.1,
end
lemma monic.is_unit_iff (hm : p.monic) : is_unit p ↔ p = 1 :=
⟨hm.eq_one_of_is_unit, λ h, h.symm ▸ is_unit_one⟩
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] {p : R[X]}
lemma monic_multiset_prod_of_monic (t : multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X])
(ht : ∀ i ∈ t, monic (f i)) :
monic (t.map f).prod :=
begin
revert ht,
refine t.induction_on _ _, { simp },
intros a t ih ht,
rw [multiset.map_cons, multiset.prod_cons],
exact (ht _ (multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)).mul (ih (λ _ hi, ht _ (multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi)))
end
lemma monic_prod_of_monic (s : finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, monic (f i)) :
monic (∏ i in s, f i) :=
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic s.1 f hs
lemma monic.next_coeff_multiset_prod (t : multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X])
(h : ∀ i ∈ t, monic (f i)) :
next_coeff (t.map f).prod = (t.map (λ i, next_coeff (f i))).sum :=
begin
revert h,
refine multiset.induction_on t _ (λ a t ih ht, _),
{ simp only [multiset.not_mem_zero, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false, multiset.map_zero,
multiset.prod_zero, multiset.sum_zero, not_false_iff, forall_true_iff],
rw ← C_1, rw next_coeff_C_eq_zero },
{ rw [multiset.map_cons, multiset.prod_cons, multiset.map_cons, multiset.sum_cons,
monic.next_coeff_mul, ih],
exacts [λ i hi, ht i (multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi), ht a (multiset.mem_cons_self _ _),
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ (λ b bs, ht _ (multiset.mem_cons_of_mem bs))] }
end
lemma monic.next_coeff_prod (s : finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, monic (f i)) :
next_coeff (∏ i in s, f i) = ∑ i in s, next_coeff (f i) :=
monic.next_coeff_multiset_prod s.1 f h
end comm_semiring
section semiring
variables [semiring R]
@[simp]
lemma monic.nat_degree_map [semiring S] [nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.monic)
(f : R →+* S) : (P.map f).nat_degree = P.nat_degree :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (nat_degree_map_le _ _) (le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero _),
rw [coeff_map, monic.coeff_nat_degree hmo, ring_hom.map_one],
exact one_ne_zero
end
@[simp]
lemma monic.degree_map [semiring S] [nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.monic)
(f : R →+* S) : (P.map f).degree = P.degree :=
begin
by_cases hP : P = 0,
{ simp [hP] },
{ refine le_antisymm (degree_map_le _ _) _,
rw [degree_eq_nat_degree hP],
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero _,
rw [coeff_map, monic.coeff_nat_degree hmo, ring_hom.map_one],
exact one_ne_zero }
end
section injective
open function
variables [semiring S] {f : R →+* S} (hf : injective f)
include hf
lemma degree_map_eq_of_injective (p : R[X]) : degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [← f.map_zero]; exact mt hf.eq_iff.1
(mt leading_coeff_eq_zero.1 h))
lemma nat_degree_map_eq_of_injective (p : R[X]) :
nat_degree (p.map f) = nat_degree p :=
nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_injective hf p)
lemma leading_coeff_map' (p : R[X]) :
leading_coeff (p.map f) = f (leading_coeff p) :=
begin
unfold leading_coeff,
rw [coeff_map, nat_degree_map_eq_of_injective hf p],
end
lemma next_coeff_map (p : R[X]) :
(p.map f).next_coeff = f p.next_coeff :=
begin
unfold next_coeff,
rw nat_degree_map_eq_of_injective hf,
split_ifs; simp
end
lemma leading_coeff_of_injective (p : R[X]) :
leading_coeff (p.map f) = f (leading_coeff p) :=
begin
delta leading_coeff,
rw [coeff_map f, nat_degree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
end
lemma monic_of_injective {p : R[X]} (hp : (p.map f).monic) : p.monic :=
begin
apply hf,
rw [← leading_coeff_of_injective hf, hp.leading_coeff, f.map_one]
end
end injective
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_X_sub_C (x : R) : monic (X - C x) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using monic_X_add_C (-x)
theorem monic_X_pow_sub {n : ℕ} (H : degree p ≤ n) : monic (X ^ (n+1) - p) :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add (show degree (-p) ≤ n, by rwa ←degree_neg p at H)
/-- `X ^ n - a` is monic. -/
lemma monic_X_pow_sub_C {R : Type u} [ring R] (a : R) {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (X ^ n - C a).monic :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h,
convert monic_X_pow_sub _,
exact le_trans degree_C_le nat.with_bot.coe_nonneg,
end
lemma not_is_unit_X_pow_sub_one (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] [nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
¬ is_unit (X ^ n - 1 : R[X]) :=
begin
intro h,
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn,
{ simpa using h },
apply hn,
rw [←@nat_degree_one R, ←(monic_X_pow_sub_C _ hn).eq_one_of_is_unit h, nat_degree_X_pow_sub_C],
end
lemma monic.sub_of_left {p q : R[X]} (hp : monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) :
monic (p - q) :=
by { rw sub_eq_add_neg, apply hp.add_of_left, rwa degree_neg }
lemma monic.sub_of_right {p q : R[X]}
(hq : q.leading_coeff = -1) (hpq : degree p < degree q) : monic (p - q) :=
have (-q).coeff (-q).nat_degree = 1 :=
by rw [nat_degree_neg, coeff_neg, show q.coeff q.nat_degree = -1, from hq, neg_neg],
by { rw sub_eq_add_neg, apply monic.add_of_right this, rwa degree_neg }
end ring
section nonzero_semiring
variables [semiring R] [nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp] lemma not_monic_zero : ¬monic (0 : R[X]) :=
not_monic_zero_iff.mp zero_ne_one
end nonzero_semiring
section not_zero_divisor
-- TODO: using gh-8537, rephrase lemmas that involve commutation around `*` using the op-ring
variables [semiring R] {p : R[X]}
lemma monic.mul_left_ne_zero (hp : monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
q * p ≠ 0 :=
begin
by_cases h : p = 1,
{ simpa [h] },
rw [ne.def, ←degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul, with_bot.add_eq_bot, not_or_distrib, degree_eq_bot],
refine ⟨hq, _⟩,
rw [←hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h,
refine (lt_trans _ h).ne',
simp
end
lemma monic.mul_right_ne_zero (hp : monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
p * q ≠ 0 :=
begin
by_cases h : p = 1,
{ simpa [h] },
rw [ne.def, ←degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul_comm, hp.degree_mul, with_bot.add_eq_bot,
not_or_distrib, degree_eq_bot],
refine ⟨hq, _⟩,
rw [←hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h,
refine (lt_trans _ h).ne',
simp
end
lemma monic.mul_nat_degree_lt_iff (h : monic p) {q : R[X]} :
(p * q).nat_degree < p.nat_degree ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧ q = 0 :=
begin
by_cases hq : q = 0,
{ suffices : 0 < p.nat_degree ↔ p.nat_degree ≠ 0,
{ simpa [hq, ←h.nat_degree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one] },
exact ⟨λ h, h.ne', λ h, lt_of_le_of_ne (nat.zero_le _) h.symm ⟩ },
{ simp [h.nat_degree_mul', hq] }
end
lemma monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff (h : monic p) {q : R[X]} :
p * q = 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
begin
by_cases hq : q = 0;
simp [h.mul_right_ne_zero, hq]
end
lemma monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff (h : monic p) {q : R[X]} :
q * p = 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
begin
by_cases hq : q = 0;
simp [h.mul_left_ne_zero, hq]
end
lemma monic.is_regular {R : Type*} [ring R] {p : R[X]} (hp : monic p) : is_regular p :=
begin
split,
{ intros q r h,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, ←hp.mul_right_eq_zero_iff, mul_sub, h, sub_self] },
{ intros q r h,
simp only at h,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, ←hp.mul_left_eq_zero_iff, sub_mul, h, sub_self] }
end
lemma degree_smul_of_smul_regular {S : Type*} [monoid S] [distrib_mul_action S R]
{k : S} (p : R[X]) (h : is_smul_regular R k) :
(k • p).degree = p.degree :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rw degree_le_iff_coeff_zero,
intros m hm,
rw degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero at hm,
simp [hm m le_rfl] },
{ rw degree_le_iff_coeff_zero,
intros m hm,
rw degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero at hm,
refine h _,
simpa using hm m le_rfl },
end
lemma nat_degree_smul_of_smul_regular {S : Type*} [monoid S] [distrib_mul_action S R]
{k : S} (p : R[X]) (h : is_smul_regular R k) :
(k • p).nat_degree = p.nat_degree :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ simp [hp] },
rw [←with_bot.coe_eq_coe, ←degree_eq_nat_degree hp, ←degree_eq_nat_degree,
degree_smul_of_smul_regular p h],
contrapose! hp,
rw ←smul_zero k at hp,
exact h.polynomial hp
end
lemma leading_coeff_smul_of_smul_regular {S : Type*} [monoid S] [distrib_mul_action S R]
{k : S} (p : R[X]) (h : is_smul_regular R k) :
(k • p).leading_coeff = k • p.leading_coeff :=
by rw [leading_coeff, leading_coeff, coeff_smul, nat_degree_smul_of_smul_regular p h]
lemma monic_of_is_unit_leading_coeff_inv_smul (h : is_unit p.leading_coeff) :
monic (h.unit⁻¹ • p) :=
begin
rw [monic.def, leading_coeff_smul_of_smul_regular _ (is_smul_regular_of_group _), units.smul_def],
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h,
simp only [←hk, smul_eq_mul, ←units.coe_mul, units.coe_eq_one, inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul],
simp [units.ext_iff, is_unit.unit_spec]
end
lemma is_unit_leading_coeff_mul_right_eq_zero_iff (h : is_unit p.leading_coeff) {q : R[X]} :
p * q = 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro hp,
rw ←smul_eq_zero_iff_eq (h.unit)⁻¹ at hp,
have : (h.unit)⁻¹ • (p * q) = ((h.unit)⁻¹ • p) * q,
{ ext,
simp only [units.smul_def, coeff_smul, coeff_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_sum],
refine sum_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
rw ←mul_assoc },
rwa [this, monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff] at hp,
exact monic_of_is_unit_leading_coeff_inv_smul _ },
{ rintro rfl,
simp }
end
lemma is_unit_leading_coeff_mul_left_eq_zero_iff (h : is_unit p.leading_coeff) {q : R[X]} :
q * p = 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro hp,
replace hp := congr_arg (* C ↑(h.unit)⁻¹) hp,
simp only [zero_mul] at hp,
rwa [mul_assoc, monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff] at hp,
refine monic_mul_C_of_leading_coeff_mul_eq_one _,
simp [units.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, is_unit.unit_spec] },
{ rintro rfl,
rw zero_mul }
end
end not_zero_divisor
end polynomial
|
717360f92745c3258c2eedffbae23b4ede35b584 | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /tests/lean/run/nat_bug.lean | 51fc2f301a4860e8f2b8df794229401107a26c04 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 789 | lean | import logic
using decidable
inductive nat : Type :=
zero : nat,
succ : nat → nat
definition refl := @eq.refl
namespace nat
definition pred (n : nat) := nat.rec zero (fun m x, m) n
theorem pred_zero : pred zero = zero := refl _
theorem pred_succ (n : nat) : pred (succ n) = n := refl _
theorem zero_or_succ (n : nat) : n = zero ∨ n = succ (pred n)
:= induction_on n
(or.intro_left _ (refl zero))
(take m IH, or.intro_right _
(show succ m = succ (pred (succ m)), from congr_arg succ (symm (pred_succ m))))
theorem zero_or_succ2 (n : nat) : n = zero ∨ n = succ (pred n)
:= @induction_on _ n
(or.intro_left _ (refl zero))
(take m IH, or.intro_right _
(show succ m = succ (pred (succ m)), from congr_arg succ (symm (pred_succ m))))
end nat
end experiment
|
d7ba017e2e22b3b6f6d1d94dad9de16ed5d49dce | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /test/run_parser.lean | 11103ec6722e04f00c75ec19660fc1da46938850 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 312 | lean | import tactic.core
open tactic lean.parser interactive.types
run_parser do
e ← with_input texpr "λ x:ℕ, x",
e ← to_expr e.1,
guard (e =ₐ `(λ x:ℕ, x)),
emit_code_here "def foo := 1"
example : foo = 1 := rfl
-- check that `emit_code_here` terminates properly
run_parser emit_code_here "\n"
|
3c718dc00112f0f6924d76e9631a7799082c89be | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/topology/paracompact.lean | 9e5aa0e7903451d901cd47fadeeeed699c36d0e0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,311 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.subset_properties
import topology.separation
import data.option.basic
/-!
# Paracompact topological spaces
A topological space `X` is said to be paracompact if every open covering of `X` admits a locally
finite refinement.
The definition requires that each set of the new covering is a subset of one of the sets of the
initial covering. However, one can ensure that each open covering `s : ι → set X` admits a *precise*
locally finite refinement, i.e., an open covering `t : ι → set X` with the same index set such that
`∀ i, t i ⊆ s i`, see lemma `precise_refinement`. We also provide a convenience lemma
`precise_refinement_set` that deals with open coverings of a closed subset of `X` instead of the
whole space.
We also prove the following facts.
* Every compact space is paracompact, see instance `paracompact_of_compact`.
* A locally compact sigma compact Hausdorff space is paracompact, see instance
`paracompact_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact`. Moreover, we can choose a locally finite
refinement with sets in a given collection of filter bases of `𝓝 x, `x : X`, see
`refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis`. For example, in a proper metric space
every open covering `⋃ i, s i` admits a refinement `⋃ i, metric.ball (c i) (r i)`.
* Every paracompact Hausdorff space is normal. This statement is not an instance to avoid loops in
the instance graph.
* Every `emetric_space` is a paracompact space, see instance `emetric_space.paracompact_space` in
`topology/metric_space/emetric_space`.
## TODO
* Define partition of unity.
* Prove (some of) [Michael's theorems](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Michael%27s+theorem).
## Tags
compact space, paracompact space, locally finite covering
-/
open set filter function
open_locale filter topological_space
universes u v
/-- A topological space is called paracompact, if every open covering of this space admits a locally
finite refinement. We use the same universe for all types in the definition to avoid creating a
class like `paracompact_space.{u v}`. Due to lemma `precise_refinement` below, every open covering
`s : α → set X` indexed on `α : Type v` has a *precise* locally finite refinement, i.e., a locally
finite refinement `t : α → set X` indexed on the same type such that each `∀ i, t i ⊆ s i`. -/
class paracompact_space (X : Type v) [topological_space X] : Prop :=
(locally_finite_refinement :
∀ (α : Type v) (s : α → set X) (ho : ∀ a, is_open (s a)) (hc : (⋃ a, s a) = univ),
∃ (β : Type v) (t : β → set X) (ho : ∀ b, is_open (t b)) (hc : (⋃ b, t b) = univ),
locally_finite t ∧ ∀ b, ∃ a, t b ⊆ s a)
variables {ι : Type u} {X : Type v} [topological_space X]
/-- Any open cover of a paracompact space has a locally finite *precise* refinement, that is,
one indexed on the same type with each open set contained in the corresponding original one. -/
lemma precise_refinement [paracompact_space X] (u : ι → set X) (uo : ∀ a, is_open (u a))
(uc : (⋃ i, u i) = univ) :
∃ v : ι → set X, (∀ a, is_open (v a)) ∧ (⋃ i, v i) = univ ∧ locally_finite v ∧ (∀ a, v a ⊆ u a) :=
begin
-- Apply definition to `range u`, then turn existence quantifiers into functions using `choose`
have := paracompact_space.locally_finite_refinement (range u) coe
(set_coe.forall.2 $ forall_range_iff.2 uo) (by rwa [← sUnion_range, subtype.range_coe]),
simp only [set_coe.exists, subtype.coe_mk, exists_range_iff', Union_eq_univ_iff,
exists_prop] at this,
choose α t hto hXt htf ind hind, choose t_inv ht_inv using hXt, choose U hxU hU using htf,
-- Send each `i` to the union of `t a` over `a ∈ ind ⁻¹' {i}`
refine ⟨λ i, ⋃ (a : α) (ha : ind a = i), t a, _, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact λ a, is_open_Union (λ a, is_open_Union $ λ ha, hto a) },
{ simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_Union],
exact λ x, ⟨ind (t_inv x), _, rfl, ht_inv _⟩ },
{ refine λ x, ⟨U x, hxU x, ((hU x).image ind).subset _⟩,
simp only [subset_def, mem_Union, mem_set_of_eq, set.nonempty, mem_inter_eq],
rintro i ⟨y, ⟨a, rfl, hya⟩, hyU⟩,
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨y, hya, hyU⟩ },
{ simp only [subset_def, mem_Union],
rintro i x ⟨a, rfl, hxa⟩,
exact hind _ hxa }
end
/-- In a paracompact space, every open covering of a closed set admits a locally finite refinement
indexed by the same type. -/
lemma precise_refinement_set [paracompact_space X] {s : set X} (hs : is_closed s)
(u : ι → set X) (uo : ∀ i, is_open (u i)) (us : s ⊆ ⋃ i, u i) :
∃ v : ι → set X, (∀ i, is_open (v i)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i, v i) ∧ locally_finite v ∧ (∀ i, v i ⊆ u i) :=
begin
rcases precise_refinement (λ i, option.elim i sᶜ u)
(option.forall.2 ⟨is_open_compl_iff.2 hs, uo⟩) _ with ⟨v, vo, vc, vf, vu⟩,
refine ⟨v ∘ some, λ i, vo _, _, vf.comp_injective (option.some_injective _), λ i, vu _⟩,
{ simp only [Union_option, ← compl_subset_iff_union] at vc,
exact subset.trans (subset_compl_comm.1 $ vu option.none) vc },
{ simpa only [Union_option, option.elim, ← compl_subset_iff_union, compl_compl] }
end
/-- A compact space is paracompact. -/
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance paracompact_of_compact [compact_space X] : paracompact_space X :=
begin
-- the proof is trivial: we choose a finite subcover using compactness, and use it
refine ⟨λ ι s ho hu, _⟩,
rcases compact_univ.elim_finite_subcover _ ho hu.ge with ⟨T, hT⟩,
have := hT, simp only [subset_def, mem_Union] at this,
choose i hiT hi using λ x, this x (mem_univ x),
refine ⟨(T : set ι), λ t, s t, λ t, ho _, _, locally_finite_of_fintype _, λ t, ⟨t, subset.rfl⟩⟩,
rwa [Union_subtype, finset.set_bUnion_coe, ← univ_subset_iff],
end
/-- Let `X` be a locally compact sigma compact Hausdorff topological space, let `s` be a closed set
in `X`. Suppose that for each `x ∈ s` the sets `B x : ι x → set X` with the predicate
`p x : ι x → Prop` form a basis of the filter `𝓝 x`. Then there exists a locally finite covering
`λ i, B (c i) (r i)` of `s` such that all “centers” `c i` belong to `s` and each `r i` satisfies
`p (c i)`.
The notation is inspired by the case `B x r = metric.ball x r` but the theorem applies to
`nhds_basis_opens` as well. If the covering must be subordinate to some open covering of `s`, then
the user should use a basis obtained by `filter.has_basis.restrict_subset` or a similar lemma, see
the proof of `paracompact_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact` for an example.
The formalization is based on two [ncatlab](https://ncatlab.org/) proofs:
* [locally compact and sigma compact spaces are paracompact](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/locally+compact+and+sigma-compact+spaces+are+paracompact);
* [open cover of smooth manifold admits locally finite refinement by closed balls](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/partition+of+unity#ExistenceOnSmoothManifolds).
See also `refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis` for a version of this lemma
dealing with a covering of the whole space.
In most cases (namely, if `B c r ∪ B c r'` is again a set of the form `B c r''`) it is possible
to choose `α = X`. This fact is not yet formalized in `mathlib`. -/
theorem refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis_set
[locally_compact_space X] [sigma_compact_space X] [t2_space X]
{ι : X → Type u} {p : Π x, ι x → Prop} {B : Π x, ι x → set X} {s : set X}
(hs : is_closed s) (hB : ∀ x ∈ s, (𝓝 x).has_basis (p x) (B x)) :
∃ (α : Type v) (c : α → X) (r : Π a, ι (c a)), (∀ a, c a ∈ s ∧ p (c a) (r a)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ a, B (c a) (r a)) ∧ locally_finite (λ a, B (c a) (r a)) :=
begin
classical,
-- For technical reasons we prepend two empty sets to the sequence `compact_exhaustion.choice X`
set K' : compact_exhaustion X := compact_exhaustion.choice X,
set K : compact_exhaustion X := K'.shiftr.shiftr,
set Kdiff := λ n, K (n + 1) \ interior (K n),
-- Now we restate some properties of `compact_exhaustion` for `K`/`Kdiff`
have hKcov : ∀ x, x ∈ Kdiff (K'.find x + 1),
{ intro x,
simpa only [K'.find_shiftr]
using diff_subset_diff_right interior_subset (K'.shiftr.mem_diff_shiftr_find x) },
have Kdiffc : ∀ n, is_compact (Kdiff n ∩ s),
from λ n, ((K.is_compact _).diff is_open_interior).inter_right hs,
-- Next we choose a finite covering `B (c n i) (r n i)` of each
-- `Kdiff (n + 1) ∩ s` such that `B (c n i) (r n i) ∩ s` is disjoint with `K n`
have : ∀ n (x : Kdiff (n + 1) ∩ s), (K n)ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 (x : X),
from λ n x, is_open.mem_nhds (K.is_closed n).is_open_compl
(λ hx', x.2.1.2 $ K.subset_interior_succ _ hx'),
haveI : ∀ n (x : Kdiff n ∩ s), nonempty (ι x) := λ n x, (hB x x.2.2).nonempty,
choose! r hrp hr using (λ n (x : Kdiff (n + 1) ∩ s), (hB x x.2.2).mem_iff.1 (this n x)),
have hxr : ∀ n x (hx : x ∈ Kdiff (n + 1) ∩ s), B x (r n ⟨x, hx⟩) ∈ 𝓝 x,
from λ n x hx, (hB x hx.2).mem_of_mem (hrp _ ⟨x, hx⟩),
choose T hT using λ n, (Kdiffc (n + 1)).elim_nhds_subcover' _ (hxr n),
set T' : Π n, set ↥(Kdiff (n + 1) ∩ s) := λ n, T n,
-- Finally, we take the union of all these coverings
refine ⟨Σ n, T' n, λ a, a.2, λ a, r a.1 a.2, _, _, _⟩,
{ rintro ⟨n, x, hx⟩, exact ⟨x.2.2, hrp _ _⟩ },
{ refine (λ x hx, mem_Union.2 _),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (hT _ ⟨hKcov x, hx⟩) with ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, hcT, hcx⟩,
exact ⟨⟨_, ⟨c, hc⟩, hcT⟩, hcx⟩ },
{ intro x,
refine ⟨interior (K (K'.find x + 3)),
is_open.mem_nhds is_open_interior (K.subset_interior_succ _ (hKcov x).1), _⟩,
have : (⋃ k ≤ K'.find x + 2, (range $ sigma.mk k) : set (Σ n, T' n)).finite,
from (finite_le_nat _).bUnion (λ k hk, finite_range _),
apply this.subset, rintro ⟨k, c, hc⟩,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_set_of_eq, mem_image_eq, subtype.coe_mk],
rintro ⟨x, hxB : x ∈ B c (r k c), hxK⟩,
refine ⟨k, _, ⟨c, hc⟩, rfl⟩,
have := (mem_compl_iff _ _).1 (hr k c hxB),
contrapose! this with hnk,
exact K.subset hnk (interior_subset hxK) },
end
/-- Let `X` be a locally compact sigma compact Hausdorff topological space. Suppose that for each
`x` the sets `B x : ι x → set X` with the predicate `p x : ι x → Prop` form a basis of the filter
`𝓝 x`. Then there exists a locally finite covering `λ i, B (c i) (r i)` of `X` such that each `r i`
satisfies `p (c i)`
The notation is inspired by the case `B x r = metric.ball x r` but the theorem applies to
`nhds_basis_opens` as well. If the covering must be subordinate to some open covering of `s`, then
the user should use a basis obtained by `filter.has_basis.restrict_subset` or a similar lemma, see
the proof of `paracompact_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact` for an example.
The formalization is based on two [ncatlab](https://ncatlab.org/) proofs:
* [locally compact and sigma compact spaces are paracompact](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/locally+compact+and+sigma-compact+spaces+are+paracompact);
* [open cover of smooth manifold admits locally finite refinement by closed balls](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/partition+of+unity#ExistenceOnSmoothManifolds).
See also `refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis_set` for a version of this lemma
dealing with a covering of a closed set.
In most cases (namely, if `B c r ∪ B c r'` is again a set of the form `B c r''`) it is possible
to choose `α = X`. This fact is not yet formalized in `mathlib`. -/
theorem refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis
[locally_compact_space X] [sigma_compact_space X] [t2_space X]
{ι : X → Type u} {p : Π x, ι x → Prop} {B : Π x, ι x → set X}
(hB : ∀ x, (𝓝 x).has_basis (p x) (B x)) :
∃ (α : Type v) (c : α → X) (r : Π a, ι (c a)), (∀ a, p (c a) (r a)) ∧
(⋃ a, B (c a) (r a)) = univ ∧ locally_finite (λ a, B (c a) (r a)) :=
let ⟨α, c, r, hp, hU, hfin⟩ := refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis_set
is_closed_univ (λ x _, hB x)
in ⟨α, c, r, λ a, (hp a).2, univ_subset_iff.1 hU, hfin⟩
/-- A locally compact sigma compact Hausdorff space is paracompact. See also
`refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis` for a more precise statement. -/
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance paracompact_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact [locally_compact_space X]
[sigma_compact_space X] [t2_space X] : paracompact_space X :=
begin
refine ⟨λ α s ho hc, _⟩,
choose i hi using Union_eq_univ_iff.1 hc,
have : ∀ x : X, (𝓝 x).has_basis (λ t : set X, (x ∈ t ∧ is_open t) ∧ t ⊆ s (i x)) id,
from λ x : X, (nhds_basis_opens x).restrict_subset (is_open.mem_nhds (ho (i x)) (hi x)),
rcases refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis this
with ⟨β, c, t, hto, htc, htf⟩,
exact ⟨β, t, λ x, (hto x).1.2, htc, htf, λ b, ⟨i $ c b, (hto b).2⟩⟩
end
/- Dieudonné‘s theorem: a paracompact Hausdorff space is normal. Formalization is based on the proof
at [ncatlab](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/paracompact+Hausdorff+spaces+are+normal). -/
lemma normal_of_paracompact_t2 [t2_space X] [paracompact_space X] : normal_space X :=
begin
/- First we show how to go from points to a set on one side. -/
have : ∀ (s t : set X), is_closed s → is_closed t →
(∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u v, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ disjoint u v) →
∃ u v, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ disjoint u v,
{ /- For each `x ∈ s` we choose open disjoint `u x ∋ x` and `v x ⊇ t`. The sets `u x` form an
open covering of `s`. We choose a locally finite refinement `u' : s → set X`, then `⋃ i, u' i`
and `(closure (⋃ i, u' i))ᶜ` are disjoint open neighborhoods of `s` and `t`. -/
intros s t hs ht H, choose u v hu hv hxu htv huv using set_coe.forall'.1 H,
rcases precise_refinement_set hs u hu (λ x hx, mem_Union.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, hxu _⟩)
with ⟨u', hu'o, hcov', hu'fin, hsub⟩,
refine ⟨⋃ i, u' i, (closure (⋃ i, u' i))ᶜ, is_open_Union hu'o, is_closed_closure.is_open_compl,
hcov', _, disjoint_compl_right.mono le_rfl (compl_le_compl subset_closure)⟩,
rw [hu'fin.closure_Union, compl_Union, subset_Inter_iff],
refine λ i x hxt hxu, absurd (htv i hxt) (closure_minimal _ (is_closed_compl_iff.2 $ hv _) hxu),
exact λ y hyu hyv, huv i ⟨hsub _ hyu, hyv⟩ },
/- Now we apply the lemma twice: first to `s` and `t`, then to `t` and each point of `s`. -/
refine ⟨λ s t hs ht hst, this s t hs ht (λ x hx, _)⟩,
rcases this t {x} ht is_closed_singleton (λ y hyt, _) with ⟨v, u, hv, hu, htv, hxu, huv⟩,
{ exact ⟨u, v, hu, hv, singleton_subset_iff.1 hxu, htv, huv.symm⟩ },
{ have : x ≠ y, by { rintro rfl, exact hst ⟨hx, hyt⟩ },
rcases t2_separation this with ⟨v, u, hv, hu, hxv, hyu, hd⟩,
exact ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hyu, singleton_subset_iff.2 hxv, disjoint.symm hd.le⟩ }
end
|
e0593980375044a634c4ecf1abff3d0db8b8e820 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/tactic.lean | b2c74c1474d4897e08f30e8265c9ecc43a54aebd | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 466 | lean | import Lean.Meta
open Lean
open Lean.Meta
axiom simple : forall {p q : Prop}, p → q → p
def print (msg : MessageData) : MetaM Unit := do
trace[Meta.Tactic] msg
def tst1 : MetaM Unit := do
let cinfo ← getConstInfo `simple
let mvar ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar cinfo.type
let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
let (_, mvarId) ← introN mvarId 4
assumption mvarId
let result ← instantiateMVars mvar
print result
set_option trace.Meta.Tactic true
#eval tst1
|
214fecde25de25a09438d8fd6f6172a3f678bfa8 | d6124c8dbe5661dcc5b8c9da0a56fbf1f0480ad6 | /Papyrus/IR/CallingConvention.lean | e7ec83e8e11803304ba55bf104b1d206bb8461a5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | xubaiw/lean4-papyrus | c3fbbf8ba162eb5f210155ae4e20feb2d32c8182 | 02e82973a5badda26fc0f9fd15b3d37e2eb309e0 | refs/heads/master | 1,691,425,756,824 | 1,632,122,825,000 | 1,632,123,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,540 | lean | import Papyrus.Internal.Enum
namespace Papyrus
open Internal
/--
LLVM calling conventions.
Note that LLVM IR allows arbitrary numbers as calling convention identifiers.
-/
enum CallingConvention : UInt32
| /--
The default llvm calling convention, compatible with C.
This convention is the only calling convention that supports `vararg` calls.
As with typical C calling conventions, the callee/caller have to tolerate
certain amounts of prototype mismatch.
-/
c := 0
| /--
This calling convention attempts to make calls as fast as possible
(e.g., by passing things in registers).
-/
fast := 8
| /--
This calling convention attempts to make code in the caller as
efficient as possible under the assumption that the call is not commonly
executed.
As such, these calls often preserve all registers so that the call does not
break any live ranges in the caller side.
-/
cold := 9
| /-- Calling convention used by the Glasgow Haskell Compiler (GHC) -/
ghc := 10
| /-- Calling convention used by the High-Performance Erlang Compiler (HiPE).-/
hipe := 11
| /-- Calling convention for stack based JavaScript calls. -/
webKitJS := 12
| /--
Calling convention for dynamic register based calls
(e.g., `stackmap` and `patchpoint` intrinsics).
-/
anyReg := 13
| /-- Calling convention for runtime calls that preserves most registers. -/
preserveMost := 14
| /-- Calling convention for runtime calls that preserves (almost) all registers. -/
preserveAll := 15
| /-- Calling convention for Swift. -/
swift := 16
| /-- Calling convention for access functions. -/
cxxFastTLS := 17
| /--
This calling convention attempts to make calls as fast as possible
while guaranteeing that tail call optimization can always be performed.
-/
tail := 18
| /--
Calling convention on Windows for the Control Guard Check ICall function.
The function takes exactly one argument (the address of the target function)
passed in the first argument register, and has no return value.
All register values are preserved.
-/
cfGuardCheck := 19
| /--
This follows the Swift calling convention in how arguments are passed but
guarantees tail calls will be made by making the callee clean up their stack.
-/
swiftTail := 20
| /--
`stdcall` is the calling conventions mostly used by the Win32 API.
It is basically the same as the C convention with the difference in that
the callee is responsible for popping the arguments from the stack.
-/
x86StdCall := 64
| /--
`fast` analog of `x86StdCall`.
Passes first two arguments in `ECX`:`EDX` registers, others - via stack.
Callee is responsible for stack cleaning.
-/
x86FastCall := 65
| /--
ARM Procedure Calling Standard calling convention
(obsolete, but still used on some targets).
-/
armAPCS := 55
| /--
ARM Architecture Procedure Calling Standard calling convention (aka EABI).
Soft floating point ABI.
-/
armAAPCS := 67
| /--
ARM Architecture Procedure Calling Standard calling convention (aka EABI).
Hard floating point ABI.
-/
armAAPCSVFP := 68
| /-- Calling convention used for MSP430 interrupt routines. -/
msp430Intr := 69
| /--
Similar to `x86StdCall`.
Passes first argument in ECX, others via stack.
Callee is responsible for stack cleaning.
MSVC uses this by default for methods in its ABI.
-/
x86ThisCall := 70
| /-- Call to a PTX kernel. Passes all arguments in parameter space. -/
ptxKernel := 71
| /--
Call to a PTX device function.
Passes all arguments in register or parameter space.
-/
ptxDevice := 72
| /--
Calling convention for SPIR non-kernel device functions.
* No lowering or expansion of arguments.
* Structures are passed as a pointer to a struct with the `byval` attribute.
* Functions can only call `spirFunc` and `spirKernel` functions.
* Functions can only have zero or one return values.
* Variable arguments are not allowed, except for `printf`.
* How arguments/return values are lowered are not specified.
* Functions are only visible to the devices.
-/
spirFunc := 75
| /--
Calling convention for SPIR kernel functions.
Inherits the restrictions of `spirFunc`, except:
* Cannot have non-void return values.
* Cannot have variable arguments.
* Can also be called by the host.
* Is externally visible.
-/
spirKernel := 76
| /-- Calling conventions for Intel OpenCL built-ins. -/
intelOCLBuiltin := 77
| /--
The C convention as specified in the x86-64 supplement to the System V ABI,
used on most non-Windows systems.
-/
x8664SysV := 78
| /--
The C convention as implemented on Windows/x86-64 and AArch64.
This convention differs from the more common `x8664SysV` convention in a
number of ways, most notably in that XMM registers used to pass arguments are
shadowed by GPRs, and vice versa.
On AArch64, this is identical to the normal C (AAPCS) calling
convention for normal functions, but floats are passed in integer
registers to variadic functions.
-/
win64 := 79
| /-- MSVC calling convention that passes vectors and vector aggregates in SSE registers. -/
x86VectorCall := 80
| /--
Calling convention used by HipHop Virtual Machine (HHVM) to
perform calls to and from translation cache and for calling PHP functions.
The HHVM calling convention supports tail/sibling call elimination.
-/
hhvm := 81
| /-- HHVM calling convention for invoking C/C++ helpers. -/
hhvmC := 82
| /--
x86 hardware interrupt context.
Callee may take one or two parameters, where the 1st represents a pointer
to hardware context frame and the 2nd represents hardware error code,
the presence of the later depends on the interrupt vector taken.
Valid for both 32- and 64-bit subtargets.
-/
x86Intr := 83
| /-- Calling convention used for AVR interrupt routines. -/
avrIntr := 84
| /-- Calling convention used for AVR signal routines. -/
avrSignal := 85
| /--
Calling convention used for special AVR rtlib functions which have an
"optimized" convention to preserve registers.
-/
avrBuiltin := 86
| /--
Calling convention used for Mesa vertex shaders, or AMDPAL last shader
stage before rasterization (vertex shader if tessellation and geometry
are not in use, or otherwise copy shader if one is needed).
-/
amdGpuVS := 87
| /-- Calling convention used for Mesa/AMDPAL geometry shaders. -/
amdGpuGS := 88
| /-- Calling convention used for Mesa/AMDPAL pixel shaders. -/
amdGpuPS := 89
| /-- Calling convention used for Mesa/AMDPAL compute shaders. -/
amdGpuCS := 90
| /-- Calling convention for AMDGPU code object kernels. -/
amdGpuKernel := 91
| /-- Register calling convention used for parameters transfer optimization. -/
x86RegCall := 92
| /--
Calling convention used for Mesa/AMDPAL hull shaders
(= tessellation control shaders).
-/
amdGpuHs := 93
| /--
Calling convention used for special MSP430 rtlib functions
which have an "optimized" convention using additional registers.
-/
msp430Builtin := 94
| /-- Calling convention used for AMDPAL vertex shader if tessellation is in use. -/
amdGpuLs := 95
| /--
Calling convention used for AMDPAL shader stage before geometry shader
if geometry is in use. So either the domain (= tessellation evaluation)
shader if tessellation is in use, or otherwise the vertex shader.
-/
amdGpuES := 96
| /-- Calling convention between AArch64 Advanced SIMD functions -/
aarch64VectorCall := 97
| /-- Calling convention between AArch64 SVE functions. -/
aarch64SVEVectorCall := 98
| /--
Calling convention for `emscripten __invoke_*` functions. The first
argument is required to be the function ptr being indirectly called.
The remainder matches the regular calling convention.
-/
wasmEmscriptenInvoke := 99
| /-- Calling convention used for AMD graphics targets. -/
amdGpuGfx := 100
| /-- Calling convention used for M68k interrupt routines. -/
m68kIntr := 101
deriving BEq, DecidableEq, Repr
namespace CallingConvention
/-- The default calling convention (i.e., `c`). -/
def default := c
/-- The start of the target-specific calling conventions (e.g., `x86FastCall`). -/
def firstTargetVal : UInt32 := 63
/-- The highest possible calling convention ID. -/
def maxVal : UInt32 := 1023
end CallingConvention
instance : Inhabited CallingConvention := ⟨CallingConvention.default⟩
|
762e3a235bbcee13dcff3c13fa03011b8a91d9eb | 4bcaca5dc83d49803f72b7b5920b75b6e7d9de2d | /src/Lean/Meta/PPGoal.lean | 34de76d95f05a65c74bf91cb0bf902b9d0fce2ed | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | subfish-zhou/leanprover-zh_CN.github.io | 30b9fba9bd790720bd95764e61ae796697d2f603 | 8b2985d4a3d458ceda9361ac454c28168d920d3f | refs/heads/master | 1,689,709,967,820 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 409,962,097 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,306 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.InferType
import Lean.Meta.MatchUtil
namespace Lean.Meta
register_builtin_option pp.auxDecls : Bool := {
defValue := false
group := "pp"
descr := "display auxiliary declarations used to compile recursive functions"
}
register_builtin_option pp.inaccessibleNames : Bool := {
defValue := false
group := "pp"
descr := "display inaccessible declarations in the local context"
}
def withPPInaccessibleNamesImp (flag : Bool) (x : MetaM α) : MetaM α :=
withTheReader Core.Context (fun ctx => { ctx with options := pp.inaccessibleNames.setIfNotSet ctx.options flag }) x
def withPPInaccessibleNames [MonadControlT MetaM m] [Monad m] (x : m α) (flag := true) : m α :=
mapMetaM (withPPInaccessibleNamesImp flag) x
namespace ToHide
structure State where
hiddenInaccessibleProp : FVarIdSet := {} -- FVarIds of Propostions with inaccessible names but containing only visible names. We show only their types
hiddenInaccessible : FVarIdSet := {} -- FVarIds with inaccessible names, but not in hiddenInaccessibleProp
modified : Bool := false
structure Context where
goalTarget : Expr
abbrev M := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State MetaM
/- Return true if `fvarId` is marked as an hidden inaccessible or inaccessible proposition -/
def isMarked (fvarId : FVarId) : M Bool := do
let s ← get
return s.hiddenInaccessible.contains fvarId || s.hiddenInaccessibleProp.contains fvarId
/- If `fvarId` isMarked, then unmark it. -/
def unmark (fvarId : FVarId) : M Unit := do
modify fun s => {
hiddenInaccessible := s.hiddenInaccessible.erase fvarId
hiddenInaccessibleProp := s.hiddenInaccessibleProp.erase fvarId
modified := true
}
def moveToHiddeProp (fvarId : FVarId) : M Unit := do
modify fun s => {
hiddenInaccessible := s.hiddenInaccessible.erase fvarId
hiddenInaccessibleProp := s.hiddenInaccessibleProp.insert fvarId
modified := true
}
/- Return true if the given local declaration has a "visible dependency", that is, it contains
a free variable that is `hiddenInaccessible`
Recall that hiddenInaccessibleProps are visible, only their names are hidden -/
def hasVisibleDep (localDecl : LocalDecl) : M Bool := do
let s ← get
return (← getMCtx).findLocalDeclDependsOn localDecl fun fvarId =>
!s.hiddenInaccessible.contains fvarId
/- Return true if the given local declaration has a "nonvisible dependency", that is, it contains
a free variable that is `hiddenInaccessible` or `hiddenInaccessibleProp` -/
def hasInaccessibleNameDep (localDecl : LocalDecl) : M Bool := do
let s ← get
return (← getMCtx).findLocalDeclDependsOn localDecl fun fvarId =>
s.hiddenInaccessible.contains fvarId || s.hiddenInaccessibleProp.contains fvarId
/- If `e` is visible, then any inaccessible in `e` marked as hidden should be unmarked. -/
partial def visitVisibleExpr (e : Expr) : M Unit := do
visit (← instantiateMVars e) |>.run
where
visit (e : Expr) : MonadCacheT Expr Unit M Unit := do
if e.hasFVar then
checkCache e fun _ => do
match e with
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ => visit d; visit b
| Expr.lam _ d b _ => visit d; visit b
| Expr.letE _ t v b _ => visit t; visit v; visit b
| Expr.app f a _ => visit f; visit a
| Expr.mdata _ b _ => visit b
| Expr.proj _ _ b _ => visit b
| Expr.fvar fvarId _ => if (← isMarked fvarId) then unmark fvarId
| _ => pure ()
def fixpointStep : M Unit := do
visitVisibleExpr (← read).goalTarget -- The goal target is a visible forward dependency
(← getLCtx).forM fun localDecl => do
let fvarId := localDecl.fvarId
if (← get).hiddenInaccessible.contains fvarId then
if (← hasVisibleDep localDecl) then
/- localDecl is marked to be hidden, but it has a (backward) visible dependency. -/
unmark fvarId
if (← isProp localDecl.type) then
unless (← hasInaccessibleNameDep localDecl) do
moveToHiddeProp fvarId
else
visitVisibleExpr localDecl.type
match localDecl.value? with
| some value => visitVisibleExpr value
| _ => pure ()
partial def fixpoint : M Unit := do
modify fun s => { s with modified := false }
fixpointStep
if (← get).modified then
fixpoint
/-
If pp.inaccessibleNames == false, then collect two sets of `FVarId`s : `hiddenInaccessible` and `hiddenInaccessibleProp`
1- `hiddenInaccessible` contains `FVarId`s of free variables with inaccessible names that
a) are not propositions or are propositions containing "visible" names.
2- `hiddenInaccessibleProp` contains `FVarId`s of free variables with inaccessible names that are propositions
containing "visible" names.
Both sets do not contain `FVarId`s that contain visible backward or forward dependencies.
The `goalTarget` counts as a forward dependency.
We say a name is visible if it is a free variable with FVarId not in `hiddenInaccessible` nor `hiddenInaccessibleProp`
-/
def collect (goalTarget : Expr) : MetaM (FVarIdSet × FVarIdSet) := do
if pp.inaccessibleNames.get (← getOptions) then
/- Don't hide inaccessible names when `pp.inaccessibleNames` is set to true. -/
return ({}, {})
else
let lctx ← getLCtx
let hiddenInaccessible := lctx.foldl (init := {}) fun hiddenInaccessible localDecl => do
if localDecl.userName.isInaccessibleUserName then
hiddenInaccessible.insert localDecl.fvarId
else
hiddenInaccessible
let (_, s) ← fixpoint.run { goalTarget := goalTarget } |>.run { hiddenInaccessible := hiddenInaccessible }
return (s.hiddenInaccessible, s.hiddenInaccessibleProp)
end ToHide
private def addLine (fmt : Format) : Format :=
if fmt.isNil then fmt else fmt ++ Format.line
def ppGoal (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Format := do
match (← getMCtx).findDecl? mvarId with
| none => pure "unknown goal"
| some mvarDecl => do
let indent := 2 -- Use option
let ppAuxDecls := pp.auxDecls.get (← getOptions)
let lctx := mvarDecl.lctx
let lctx := lctx.sanitizeNames.run' { options := (← getOptions) }
withLCtx lctx mvarDecl.localInstances do
let (hidden, hiddenProp) ← ToHide.collect mvarDecl.type
-- The followint two `let rec`s are being used to control the generated code size.
-- Then should be remove after we rewrite the compiler in Lean
let rec pushPending (ids : List Name) (type? : Option Expr) (fmt : Format) : MetaM Format :=
if ids.isEmpty then
pure fmt
else
let fmt := addLine fmt
match type? with
| none => pure fmt
| some type => do
let typeFmt ← ppExpr type
pure $ fmt ++ (Format.joinSep ids.reverse (format " ") ++ " :" ++ Format.nest indent (Format.line ++ typeFmt)).group
let rec ppVars (varNames : List Name) (prevType? : Option Expr) (fmt : Format) (localDecl : LocalDecl) : MetaM (List Name × Option Expr × Format) := do
if hiddenProp.contains localDecl.fvarId then
let fmt ← pushPending varNames prevType? fmt
let fmt := addLine fmt
let type ← instantiateMVars localDecl.type
let typeFmt ← ppExpr type
let fmt := fmt ++ " : " ++ typeFmt
pure ([], none, fmt)
else
match localDecl with
| LocalDecl.cdecl _ _ varName type _ =>
let varName := varName.simpMacroScopes
let type ← instantiateMVars type
if prevType? == none || prevType? == some type then
pure (varName :: varNames, some type, fmt)
else do
let fmt ← pushPending varNames prevType? fmt
pure ([varName], some type, fmt)
| LocalDecl.ldecl _ _ varName type val _ => do
let varName := varName.simpMacroScopes
let fmt ← pushPending varNames prevType? fmt
let fmt := addLine fmt
let type ← instantiateMVars type
let val ← instantiateMVars val
let typeFmt ← ppExpr type
let valFmt ← ppExpr val
let fmt := fmt ++ (format varName ++ " : " ++ typeFmt ++ " :=" ++ Format.nest indent (Format.line ++ valFmt)).group
pure ([], none, fmt)
let (varNames, type?, fmt) ← lctx.foldlM (init := ([], none, Format.nil)) fun (varNames, prevType?, fmt) (localDecl : LocalDecl) =>
if !ppAuxDecls && localDecl.isAuxDecl || hidden.contains localDecl.fvarId then
pure (varNames, prevType?, fmt)
else
ppVars varNames prevType? fmt localDecl
let fmt ← pushPending varNames type? fmt
let fmt := addLine fmt
let typeFmt ← ppExpr (← instantiateMVars mvarDecl.type)
let fmt := fmt ++ "⊢ " ++ Format.nest indent typeFmt
match mvarDecl.userName with
| Name.anonymous => pure fmt
| name => return "case " ++ format name.eraseMacroScopes ++ Format.line ++ fmt
end Lean.Meta
|
95766917039192b6d74ee1d5dc249e60bbf474ae | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /tests/lean/doIssue.lean | ba487ccb8b9602ab4e6cf8c4c00d144f6e0a31cb | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 466 | lean | def f (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
x -- Error
IO.println x
def f' (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
discard x
IO.println x
def g (xs : Array Nat) : IO Unit := do
xs.set! 0 1 -- Error
IO.println xs
def g' (xs : Array Nat) : IO Unit := do
discard <| xs.set! 0 1 -- Error
IO.println xs
def h (xs : Array Nat) : IO Unit := do
pure (xs.set! 0 1) -- Error
IO.println xs
def h' (xs : Array Nat) : IO Unit := do
discard <| pure (xs.set! 0 1)
IO.println xs
|
44a1a90164f226283107d65079dc0b38ee701c79 | 5c5878e769950eabe897ad08485b3ba1a619cea9 | /src/categories/isomorphism.lean | d210c26c64898f6db76aa5960d21d69d62eccac2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | semorrison/lean-category-theory-pr | 39dc2077fcb41b438e61be1685e4cbca298767ed | 7adc8d91835e883db0fe75aa33661bc1480dbe55 | refs/heads/master | 1,583,748,682,010 | 1,535,111,040,000 | 1,535,111,040,000 | 128,731,071 | 1 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,528,069,880,000 | 1,523,258,452,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,187 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
import category_theory.category
import category_theory.functor
import .tactics
universes u v
namespace category_theory
structure iso {C : Type u} [category.{u v} C] (X Y : C) :=
(hom : X ⟶ Y)
(inv : Y ⟶ X)
(hom_inv_id : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X . obviously)
(inv_hom_id : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y . obviously)
restate_axiom iso.hom_inv_id
restate_axiom iso.inv_hom_id
attribute [simp,ematch] iso.hom_inv_id_lemma iso.inv_hom_id_lemma
infixr ` ≅ `:10 := iso -- type as \cong
variables {C : Type u} [𝒞 : category.{u v} C]
include 𝒞
variables {X Y Z : C}
namespace iso
instance : has_coe (iso.{u v} X Y) (X ⟶ Y) :=
{ coe := iso.hom }
-- -- These lemmas are quite common, to help us avoid having to muck around with associativity.
-- -- If anyone has a suggestion for automating them away, I would be very appreciative.
-- @[simp,ematch] lemma hom_inv_id_assoc_lemma (I : X ≅ Y) (f : X ⟶ Z) : I.hom ≫ I.inv ≫ f = f :=
-- begin
-- -- `obviously'` says:
-- rw [←category.assoc_lemma, iso.hom_inv_id_lemma, category.id_comp_lemma]
-- end
-- @[simp,ematch] lemma inv_hom_id_assoc_lemma (I : X ≅ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) : I.inv ≫ I.hom ≫ f = f :=
-- begin
-- -- `obviously'` says:
-- rw [←category.assoc_lemma, iso.inv_hom_id_lemma, category.id_comp_lemma]
-- end
@[extensionality] lemma ext
(α β : X ≅ Y)
(w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
begin
induction α with f g wα1 wα2,
induction β with h k wβ1 wβ2,
simp at w,
have p : g = k,
begin
induction w,
dsimp at *,
rw [← category.id_comp_lemma C k, ←wα2, category.assoc_lemma, wβ1, category.comp_id_lemma]
end,
-- `obviously'` says:
induction p, induction w,
refl
end
@[refl] def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X :=
{ hom := 𝟙 X,
inv := 𝟙 X,
hom_inv_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end,
inv_hom_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end }
-- TODO maybe these can have ematch?
@[simp] lemma refl_map (X : C) : (iso.refl X).hom = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_inv (X : C) : (iso.refl X).inv = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[trans] def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z :=
{ hom := α.hom ≫ β.hom,
inv := β.inv ≫ α.inv,
hom_inv_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ erw [category.assoc_lemma], conv { to_lhs, congr, skip, rw ← category.assoc_lemma }, rw iso.hom_inv_id_lemma, rw category.id_comp_lemma, rw iso.hom_inv_id_lemma end,
inv_hom_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ erw [category.assoc_lemma], conv { to_lhs, congr, skip, rw ← category.assoc_lemma }, rw iso.inv_hom_id_lemma, rw category.id_comp_lemma, rw iso.inv_hom_id_lemma end }
infixr ` ♢ `:80 := iso.trans -- type as \diamonds
@[simp,ematch] lemma trans_hom (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ♢ β).hom = α.hom ≫ β.hom := rfl
@[simp,ematch] lemma trans_inv (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ♢ β).inv = β.inv ≫ α.inv := rfl
@[symm] def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X :=
{ hom := I.inv,
inv := I.hom,
hom_inv_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end,
inv_hom_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end }
end iso
class is_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(inv : Y ⟶ X)
(hom_inv_id : f ≫ inv = 𝟙 X . obviously)
(inv_hom_id : inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y . obviously)
restate_axiom is_iso.hom_inv_id
restate_axiom is_iso.inv_hom_id
attribute [simp,ematch] is_iso.hom_inv_id_lemma is_iso.inv_hom_id_lemma
namespace is_iso
instance (X : C) : is_iso (𝟙 X) :=
{ inv := 𝟙 X,
hom_inv_id := by obviously',
inv_hom_id := by obviously' }
instance of_iso (f : X ≅ Y) : is_iso f.hom :=
{ inv := f.inv,
hom_inv_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end,
inv_hom_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end }
instance of_iso_inverse (f : X ≅ Y) : is_iso f.inv :=
{ inv := f.hom,
hom_inv_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end,
inv_hom_id := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ simp end }
end is_iso
class epi (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(left_cancellation : Π {Z : C} (g h : Y ⟶ Z) (w : f ≫ g = f ≫ h), g = h)
class mono (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(right_cancellation : Π {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ X) (w : g ≫ f = h ≫ f), g = h)
instance epi_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : epi f :=
{ left_cancellation := begin
-- This is an interesting test case for better rewrite automation.
intros,
rw [←category.id_comp_lemma C g, ←category.id_comp_lemma C h],
rw [← is_iso.inv_hom_id_lemma f],
erw [category.assoc_lemma, w, category.assoc_lemma],
end }
instance mono_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : mono f :=
{ right_cancellation := begin
intros,
rw [←category.comp_id_lemma C g, ←category.comp_id_lemma C h],
rw [← is_iso.hom_inv_id_lemma f],
erw [←category.assoc_lemma, w, ←category.assoc_lemma]
end }
@[simp] lemma cancel_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) [epi f] (g h : Y ⟶ Z) : (f ≫ g = f ≫ h) ↔ g = h :=
⟨ λ p, epi.left_cancellation g h p, begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, cases a, refl end ⟩
@[simp] lemma cancel_mono (f : X ⟶ Y) [mono f] (g h : Z ⟶ X) : (g ≫ f = h ≫ f) ↔ g = h :=
⟨ λ p, mono.right_cancellation g h p, begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ intros, cases a, refl end ⟩
namespace functor
universes u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂
variables {D : Type u₂}
variables [𝒟 : category.{u₂ v₂} D]
include 𝒟
def on_isos (F : C ↝ D) {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : (F X) ≅ (F Y) :=
{ hom := F.map i.hom,
inv := F.map i.inv,
hom_inv_id := by obviously',
inv_hom_id := by obviously' }
@[simp,ematch] lemma on_isos_hom (F : C ↝ D) {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : (F.on_isos i).hom = F.map i.hom := rfl
@[simp,ematch] lemma on_isos_inv (F : C ↝ D) {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : (F.on_isos i).inv = F.map i.inv := rfl
end functor
end category_theory |
09c3070065737d8c2a1eb609957f66db576b761d | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_group.lean | 7a8f7faf8dea85efebbe7bfe2487009eb6388249 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,527 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Uniform structure on topological groups:
* `topological_add_group.to_uniform_space` and `topological_add_group_is_uniform` can be used to
construct a canonical uniformity for a topological add group.
* extension of ℤ-bilinear maps to complete groups (useful for ring completions)
* `add_group_with_zero_nhd`: construct the topological structure from a group with a neighbourhood
around zero. Then with `topological_add_group.to_uniform_space` one can derive a `uniform_space`.
-/
import topology.uniform_space.uniform_embedding topology.uniform_space.separation topology.algebra.group
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
local notation `𝓤` := uniformity
section uniform_add_group
open filter set
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- A uniform (additive) group is a group in which the addition and negation are
uniformly continuous. -/
class uniform_add_group (α : Type*) [uniform_space α] [add_group α] : Prop :=
(uniform_continuous_sub : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 - p.2))
theorem uniform_add_group.mk' {α} [uniform_space α] [add_group α]
(h₁ : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 + p.2))
(h₂ : uniform_continuous (λp:α, -p)) : uniform_add_group α :=
⟨(uniform_continuous_fst.prod_mk (uniform_continuous_snd.comp h₂)).comp h₁⟩
variables [uniform_space α] [add_group α] [uniform_add_group α]
lemma uniform_continuous_sub' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 - p.2) :=
uniform_add_group.uniform_continuous_sub α
lemma uniform_continuous_sub [uniform_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) : uniform_continuous (λx, f x - g x) :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).comp uniform_continuous_sub'
lemma uniform_continuous_neg [uniform_space β] {f : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) : uniform_continuous (λx, - f x) :=
have uniform_continuous (λx, 0 - f x),
from uniform_continuous_sub uniform_continuous_const hf,
by simp * at *
lemma uniform_continuous_neg' : uniform_continuous (λx:α, - x) :=
uniform_continuous_neg uniform_continuous_id
lemma uniform_continuous_add [uniform_space β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) : uniform_continuous (λx, f x + g x) :=
have uniform_continuous (λx, f x - - g x),
from uniform_continuous_sub hf $ uniform_continuous_neg hg,
by simp * at *
lemma uniform_continuous_add' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, p.1 + p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_add uniform_continuous_fst uniform_continuous_snd
instance uniform_add_group.to_topological_add_group : topological_add_group α :=
{ continuous_add := uniform_continuous_add'.continuous,
continuous_neg := uniform_continuous_neg'.continuous }
instance [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β] : uniform_add_group (α × β) :=
⟨uniform_continuous.prod_mk
(uniform_continuous_sub
(uniform_continuous_fst.comp uniform_continuous_fst)
(uniform_continuous_snd.comp uniform_continuous_fst))
(uniform_continuous_sub
(uniform_continuous_fst.comp uniform_continuous_snd)
(uniform_continuous_snd.comp uniform_continuous_snd)) ⟩
lemma uniformity_translate (a : α) : (𝓤 α).map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + a, x.2 + a)) = 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm
(uniform_continuous_add uniform_continuous_id uniform_continuous_const)
(calc 𝓤 α =
((𝓤 α).map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + -a, x.2 + -a))).map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + a, x.2 + a)) :
by simp [filter.map_map, (∘)]; exact filter.map_id.symm
... ≤ (𝓤 α).map (λx:α×α, (x.1 + a, x.2 + a)) :
filter.map_mono (uniform_continuous_add uniform_continuous_id uniform_continuous_const))
lemma uniform_embedding_translate (a : α) : uniform_embedding (λx:α, x + a) :=
begin
refine ⟨assume x y, eq_of_add_eq_add_right, _⟩,
rw [← uniformity_translate a, comap_map] {occs := occurrences.pos [1]},
rintros ⟨p₁, p₂⟩ ⟨q₁, q₂⟩,
simp [prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq] {contextual := tt}
end
section
variables (α)
lemma uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero : 𝓤 α = comap (λx:α×α, x.2 - x.1) (nhds (0:α)) :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, filter.comap_comap_comp],
refine le_antisymm (filter.map_le_iff_le_comap.1 _) _,
{ assume s hs,
rcases mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invarant uniform_continuous_sub' hs with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
refine mem_map.2 (mem_sets_of_superset ht _),
rintros ⟨a, b⟩,
simpa [subset_def] using hts a b a },
{ assume s hs,
rcases mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invarant uniform_continuous_add' hs with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
refine ⟨_, ht, _⟩,
rintros ⟨a, b⟩, simpa [subset_def] using hts 0 (b - a) a }
end
end
lemma group_separation_rel (x y : α) : (x, y) ∈ separation_rel α ↔ x - y ∈ closure ({0} : set α) :=
have embedding (λa, a + (y - x)), from (uniform_embedding_translate (y - x)).embedding,
show (x, y) ∈ ⋂₀ (𝓤 α).sets ↔ x - y ∈ closure ({0} : set α),
begin
rw [this.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α, sInter_comap_sets],
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds, inter_singleton_eq_empty]
end
lemma uniform_continuous_of_tendsto_zero [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β]
{f : α → β} [is_add_group_hom f] (h : tendsto f (nhds 0) (nhds 0)) :
uniform_continuous f :=
begin
have : ((λx:β×β, x.2 - x.1) ∘ (λx:α×α, (f x.1, f x.2))) = (λx:α×α, f (x.2 - x.1)),
{ simp only [is_add_group_hom.map_sub f] },
rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero β,
tendsto_comap_iff, this],
exact tendsto.comp tendsto_comap h
end
lemma uniform_continuous_of_continuous [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β]
{f : α → β} [is_add_group_hom f] (h : continuous f) :
uniform_continuous f :=
uniform_continuous_of_tendsto_zero $
suffices tendsto f (nhds 0) (nhds (f 0)), by rwa [is_add_group_hom.map_zero f] at this,
h.tendsto 0
end uniform_add_group
section topological_add_comm_group
universes u v w x
open filter
variables {G : Type u} [add_comm_group G] [topological_space G] [topological_add_group G]
variable (G)
def topological_add_group.to_uniform_space : uniform_space G :=
{ uniformity := comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds 0),
refl :=
by refine map_le_iff_le_comap.1 (le_trans _ (pure_le_nhds 0));
simp [set.subset_def] {contextual := tt},
symm :=
begin
suffices : tendsto ((λp, -p) ∘ (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1)) (comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds 0)) (nhds (-0)),
{ simpa [(∘), tendsto_comap_iff] },
exact tendsto.comp tendsto_comap (tendsto_neg tendsto_id)
end,
comp :=
begin
intros D H,
rw mem_lift'_sets,
{ rcases H with ⟨U, U_nhds, U_sub⟩,
rcases exists_nhds_half U_nhds with ⟨V, ⟨V_nhds, V_sum⟩⟩,
existsi ((λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V),
have H : (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V ∈ comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds (0 : G)),
by existsi [V, V_nhds] ; refl,
existsi H,
have comp_rel_sub : comp_rel ((λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V) ((λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' V) ⊆ (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) ⁻¹' U,
begin
intros p p_comp_rel,
rcases p_comp_rel with ⟨z, ⟨Hz1, Hz2⟩⟩,
simpa using V_sum _ _ Hz1 Hz2
end,
exact set.subset.trans comp_rel_sub U_sub },
{ exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id }
end,
is_open_uniformity :=
begin
intro S,
let S' := λ x, {p : G × G | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ S},
show is_open S ↔ ∀ (x : G), x ∈ S → S' x ∈ comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds (0 : G)),
rw [is_open_iff_mem_nhds],
refine forall_congr (assume a, forall_congr (assume ha, _)),
rw [← nhds_translation a, mem_comap_sets, mem_comap_sets],
refine exists_congr (assume t, exists_congr (assume ht, _)),
show (λ (y : G), y - a) ⁻¹' t ⊆ S ↔ (λ (p : G × G), p.snd - p.fst) ⁻¹' t ⊆ S' a,
split,
{ rintros h ⟨x, y⟩ hx rfl, exact h hx },
{ rintros h x hx, exact @h (a, x) hx rfl }
end }
section
local attribute [instance] topological_add_group.to_uniform_space
lemma uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero' : 𝓤 G = comap (λp:G×G, p.2 - p.1) (nhds (0 : G)) := rfl
variable {G}
lemma topological_add_group_is_uniform : uniform_add_group G :=
have tendsto
((λp:(G×G), p.1 - p.2) ∘ (λp:(G×G)×(G×G), (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1)))
(comap (λp:(G×G)×(G×G), (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1)) ((nhds 0).prod (nhds 0)))
(nhds (0 - 0)) :=
tendsto_comap.comp (tendsto_sub tendsto_fst tendsto_snd),
begin
constructor,
rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff,
uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero' G, tendsto_comap_iff, prod_comap_comap_eq],
simpa [(∘)]
end
end
lemma to_uniform_space_eq {α : Type*} [u : uniform_space α] [add_comm_group α] [uniform_add_group α]:
topological_add_group.to_uniform_space α = u :=
begin
ext : 1,
show @uniformity α (topological_add_group.to_uniform_space α) = 𝓤 α,
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero' α, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α]
end
end topological_add_comm_group
namespace add_comm_group
section Z_bilin
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables [add_comm_group α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ]
/- TODO: when modules are changed to have more explicit base ring, then change replace `is_Z_bilin`
by using `is_bilinear_map ℤ` from `tensor_product`. -/
class is_Z_bilin (f : α × β → γ) : Prop :=
(add_left : ∀ a a' b, f (a + a', b) = f (a, b) + f (a', b))
(add_right : ∀ a b b', f (a, b + b') = f (a, b) + f (a, b'))
variables (f : α × β → γ) [is_Z_bilin f]
instance is_Z_bilin.comp_hom {g : γ → δ} [add_comm_group δ] [is_add_group_hom g] :
is_Z_bilin (g ∘ f) :=
by constructor; simp [(∘), is_Z_bilin.add_left f, is_Z_bilin.add_right f, is_add_group_hom.map_add g]
instance is_Z_bilin.comp_swap : is_Z_bilin (f ∘ prod.swap) :=
⟨λ a a' b, is_Z_bilin.add_right f b a a',
λ a b b', is_Z_bilin.add_left f b b' a⟩
lemma is_Z_bilin.zero_left : ∀ b, f (0, b) = 0 :=
begin
intro b,
apply add_self_iff_eq_zero.1,
rw ←is_Z_bilin.add_left f,
simp
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.zero_right : ∀ a, f (a, 0) = 0 :=
is_Z_bilin.zero_left (f ∘ prod.swap)
lemma is_Z_bilin.zero : f (0, 0) = 0 :=
is_Z_bilin.zero_left f 0
lemma is_Z_bilin.neg_left : ∀ a b, f (-a, b) = -f (a, b) :=
begin
intros a b,
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg, ←is_Z_bilin.add_left f, neg_add_self, is_Z_bilin.zero_left f]
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.neg_right : ∀ a b, f (a, -b) = -f (a, b) :=
assume a b, is_Z_bilin.neg_left (f ∘ prod.swap) b a
lemma is_Z_bilin.sub_left : ∀ a a' b, f (a - a', b) = f (a, b) - f (a', b) :=
begin
intros,
dsimp [algebra.sub],
rw [is_Z_bilin.add_left f, is_Z_bilin.neg_left f]
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.sub_right : ∀ a b b', f (a, b - b') = f (a, b) - f (a,b') :=
assume a b b', is_Z_bilin.sub_left (f ∘ prod.swap) b b' a
end Z_bilin
end add_comm_group
open add_comm_group filter set function
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
-- α, β and G are abelian topological groups, G is complete Hausdorff
variables [topological_space α] [add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
variables [topological_space β] [add_comm_group β] [topological_add_group β]
variables {G : Type*} [uniform_space G] [add_comm_group G] [uniform_add_group G]
[complete_space G] [separated G]
variables {ψ : α × β → G} (hψ : continuous ψ) [ψbilin : is_Z_bilin ψ]
include hψ ψbilin
lemma is_Z_bilin.tendsto_zero_left (x₁ : α) : tendsto ψ (nhds (x₁, 0)) (nhds 0) :=
begin
have := continuous.tendsto hψ (x₁, 0),
rwa [is_Z_bilin.zero_right ψ] at this
end
lemma is_Z_bilin.tendsto_zero_right (y₁ : β) : tendsto ψ (nhds (0, y₁)) (nhds 0) :=
begin
have := continuous.tendsto hψ (0, y₁),
rwa [is_Z_bilin.zero_left ψ] at this
end
end
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variables [topological_space α] [add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
-- β is a dense subgroup of α, inclusion is denoted by e
variables [topological_space β] [add_comm_group β] [topological_add_group β]
variables {e : β → α} [is_add_group_hom e] (de : dense_embedding e)
include de
lemma tendsto_sub_comap_self (x₀ : α) :
tendsto (λt:β×β, t.2 - t.1) (comap (λp:β×β, (e p.1, e p.2)) $ nhds (x₀, x₀)) (nhds 0) :=
begin
have comm : (λx:α×α, x.2-x.1) ∘ (λt:β×β, (e t.1, e t.2)) = e ∘ (λt:β×β, t.2 - t.1),
{ ext t,
change e t.2 - e t.1 = e (t.2 - t.1),
rwa ← is_add_group_hom.map_sub e t.2 t.1 },
have lim : tendsto (λ x : α × α, x.2-x.1) (nhds (x₀, x₀)) (nhds (e 0)),
{ have := continuous.tendsto (continuous.comp continuous_swap continuous_sub') (x₀, x₀),
simpa [-sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self, eq.symm (is_add_group_hom.map_zero e)] using this },
have := de.tendsto_comap_nhds_nhds lim comm,
simp [-sub_eq_add_neg, this]
end
end
namespace dense_embedding
open filter
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
variables {β : Type*} [topological_space β]
variables {γ : Type*} [uniform_space γ] [complete_space γ] [separated γ]
lemma continuous_extend_of_cauchy {e : α → β} {f : α → γ}
(de : dense_embedding e) (h : ∀ b : β, cauchy (map f (comap e $ nhds b))) :
continuous (de.extend f) :=
continuous_extend de $ λ b, complete_space.complete (h b)
end dense_embedding
namespace dense_embedding
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables {G : Type*}
-- β is a dense subgroup of α, inclusion is denoted by e
-- δ is a dense subgroup of γ, inclusion is denoted by f
variables [topological_space α] [add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
variables [topological_space β] [add_comm_group β] [topological_add_group β]
variables [topological_space γ] [add_comm_group γ] [topological_add_group γ]
variables [topological_space δ] [add_comm_group δ] [topological_add_group δ]
variables [uniform_space G] [add_comm_group G] [uniform_add_group G] [separated G] [complete_space G]
variables {e : β → α} [is_add_group_hom e] (de : dense_embedding e)
variables {f : δ → γ} [is_add_group_hom f] (df : dense_embedding f)
variables {φ : β × δ → G} (hφ : continuous φ) [bilin : is_Z_bilin φ]
include de df hφ bilin
variables {W' : set G} (W'_nhd : W' ∈ nhds (0 : G))
include W'_nhd
private lemma extend_Z_bilin_aux (x₀ : α) (y₁ : δ) :
∃ U₂ ∈ comap e (nhds x₀), ∀ x x' ∈ U₂, φ (x' - x, y₁) ∈ W' :=
begin
let Nx := nhds x₀,
let ee := λ u : β × β, (e u.1, e u.2),
have lim1 : tendsto (λ a : β × β, (a.2 - a.1, y₁)) (filter.prod (comap e Nx) (comap e Nx)) (nhds (0, y₁)),
{ have := tendsto.prod_mk (tendsto_sub_comap_self de x₀) (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ (p : β × β), y₁) (comap ee $ nhds (x₀, x₀)) (nhds y₁)),
rw [nhds_prod_eq, prod_comap_comap_eq, ←nhds_prod_eq],
exact (this : _) },
have lim := tendsto.comp lim1 (is_Z_bilin.tendsto_zero_right hφ y₁),
rw tendsto_prod_self_iff at lim,
exact lim W' W'_nhd,
end
private lemma extend_Z_bilin_key (x₀ : α) (y₀ : γ) :
∃ U ∈ comap e (nhds x₀), ∃ V ∈ comap f (nhds y₀),
∀ x x' ∈ U, ∀ y y' ∈ V, φ (x', y') - φ (x, y) ∈ W' :=
begin
let Nx := nhds x₀,
let Ny := nhds y₀,
let dp := dense_embedding.prod de df,
let ee := λ u : β × β, (e u.1, e u.2),
let ff := λ u : δ × δ, (f u.1, f u.2),
have lim_φ : filter.tendsto φ (nhds (0, 0)) (nhds 0),
{ have := continuous.tendsto hφ (0, 0),
rwa [is_Z_bilin.zero φ] at this },
have lim_φ_sub_sub : tendsto (λ (p : (β × β) × (δ × δ)), φ (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1))
(filter.prod (comap ee $ nhds (x₀, x₀)) (comap ff $ nhds (y₀, y₀))) (nhds 0),
{ have lim_sub_sub : tendsto (λ (p : (β × β) × δ × δ), (p.1.2 - p.1.1, p.2.2 - p.2.1))
(filter.prod (comap ee (nhds (x₀, x₀))) (comap ff (nhds (y₀, y₀)))) (filter.prod (nhds 0) (nhds 0)),
{ have := filter.prod_mono (tendsto_sub_comap_self de x₀) (tendsto_sub_comap_self df y₀),
rwa prod_map_map_eq at this },
rw ← nhds_prod_eq at lim_sub_sub,
exact tendsto.comp lim_sub_sub lim_φ },
rcases exists_nhds_quarter W'_nhd with ⟨W, W_nhd, W4⟩,
have : ∃ U₁ ∈ comap e (nhds x₀), ∃ V₁ ∈ comap f (nhds y₀),
∀ x x' ∈ U₁, ∀ y y' ∈ V₁, φ (x'-x, y'-y) ∈ W,
{ have := tendsto_prod_iff.1 lim_φ_sub_sub W W_nhd,
repeat { rw [nhds_prod_eq, ←prod_comap_comap_eq] at this },
rcases this with ⟨U, U_in, V, V_in, H⟩,
rw [mem_prod_same_iff] at U_in V_in,
rcases U_in with ⟨U₁, U₁_in, HU₁⟩,
rcases V_in with ⟨V₁, V₁_in, HV₁⟩,
existsi [U₁, U₁_in, V₁, V₁_in],
intros x x' x_in x'_in y y' y_in y'_in,
exact H _ _ (HU₁ (mk_mem_prod x_in x'_in)) (HV₁ (mk_mem_prod y_in y'_in)) },
rcases this with ⟨U₁, U₁_nhd, V₁, V₁_nhd, H⟩,
have : ∃ x₁, x₁ ∈ U₁ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty
(forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.2 de.comap_nhds_neq_bot U₁ U₁_nhd),
rcases this with ⟨x₁, x₁_in⟩,
have : ∃ y₁, y₁ ∈ V₁ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty
(forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.2 df.comap_nhds_neq_bot V₁ V₁_nhd),
rcases this with ⟨y₁, y₁_in⟩,
rcases (extend_Z_bilin_aux de df hφ W_nhd x₀ y₁) with ⟨U₂, U₂_nhd, HU⟩,
rcases (extend_Z_bilin_aux df de (continuous.comp continuous_swap hφ) W_nhd y₀ x₁) with ⟨V₂, V₂_nhd, HV⟩,
existsi [U₁ ∩ U₂, inter_mem_sets U₁_nhd U₂_nhd,
V₁ ∩ V₂, inter_mem_sets V₁_nhd V₂_nhd],
rintros x x' ⟨xU₁, xU₂⟩ ⟨x'U₁, x'U₂⟩ y y' ⟨yV₁, yV₂⟩ ⟨y'V₁, y'V₂⟩,
have key_formula : φ(x', y') - φ(x, y) = φ(x' - x, y₁) + φ(x' - x, y' - y₁) + φ(x₁, y' - y) + φ(x - x₁, y' - y),
{ repeat { rw is_Z_bilin.sub_left φ },
repeat { rw is_Z_bilin.sub_right φ },
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
simp },
rw key_formula,
have h₁ := HU x x' xU₂ x'U₂,
have h₂ := H x x' xU₁ x'U₁ y₁ y' y₁_in y'V₁,
have h₃ := HV y y' yV₂ y'V₂,
have h₄ := H x₁ x x₁_in xU₁ y y' yV₁ y'V₁,
exact W4 h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
end
omit W'_nhd
/-- Bourbaki GT III.6.5 Theorem I:
ℤ-bilinear continuous maps from dense sub-groups into a complete Hausdorff group extend by continuity.
Note: Bourbaki assumes that α and β are also complete Hausdorff, but this is not necessary. -/
theorem extend_Z_bilin : continuous (extend (dense_embedding.prod de df) φ) :=
begin
let dp := dense_embedding.prod de df,
refine dense_embedding.continuous_extend_of_cauchy (dense_embedding.prod de df) _,
rintro ⟨x₀, y₀⟩,
split,
{ apply map_ne_bot,
apply comap_neq_bot,
intros U h,
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty (mem_closure_iff_nhds.1 (dp.dense (x₀, y₀)) U h)
with ⟨x, x_in, ⟨z, z_x⟩⟩,
existsi z,
cc },
{ suffices : map (λ (p : (β × δ) × (β × δ)), φ p.2 - φ p.1)
(comap (λ (p : (β × δ) × β × δ), ((e p.1.1, f p.1.2), (e p.2.1, f p.2.2)))
(filter.prod (nhds (x₀, y₀)) (nhds (x₀, y₀)))) ≤ nhds 0,
by rwa [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero G, prod_map_map_eq, ←map_le_iff_le_comap, filter.map_map,
prod_comap_comap_eq],
intros W' W'_nhd,
have key := extend_Z_bilin_key de df hφ W'_nhd x₀ y₀,
rcases key with ⟨U, U_nhd, V, V_nhd, h⟩,
rw mem_comap_sets at U_nhd,
rcases U_nhd with ⟨U', U'_nhd, U'_sub⟩,
rw mem_comap_sets at V_nhd,
rcases V_nhd with ⟨V', V'_nhd, V'_sub⟩,
rw [mem_map, mem_comap_sets, nhds_prod_eq],
existsi set.prod (set.prod U' V') (set.prod U' V'),
rw mem_prod_same_iff,
simp only [exists_prop],
split,
{ change U' ∈ nhds x₀ at U'_nhd,
change V' ∈ nhds y₀ at V'_nhd,
have := prod_mem_prod U'_nhd V'_nhd,
tauto },
{ intros p h',
simp only [set.mem_preimage_eq, set.prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq] at h',
rcases p with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨x', y'⟩⟩,
apply h ; tauto } }
end
end dense_embedding
|
9e6710d31871c3d7a33f2a5a40134f3e95b7ef6f | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /library/smt/array.lean | e324f1bc0aa202a4038b2a04a87c6f807ccc802c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 951 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
namespace smt
universes u v
def array (α : Type u) (β : Type v) := α → β
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
open tactic
def select (a : array α β) (i : α) : β :=
a i
lemma arrayext (a₁ a₂ : array α β) : (∀ i, select a₁ i = select a₂ i) → a₁ = a₂ :=
funext
variable [decidable_eq α]
def store (a : array α β) (i : α) (v : β) : array α β :=
λ j, if j = i then v else select a j
@[simp] lemma select_store (a : array α β) (i : α) (v : β) : select (store a i v) i = v :=
by unfold smt.store smt.select; dsimp; rewrite if_pos; reflexivity
@[simp] lemma select_store_ne (a : array α β) (i j : α) (v : β) : j ≠ i → select (store a i v) j = select a j :=
by intros; unfold smt.store smt.select; dsimp; rewrite if_neg; assumption
end smt
|
a2a108317f322d6ba411a374813d4147708dc8d9 | b147e1312077cdcfea8e6756207b3fa538982e12 | /tests/examples.lean | 5a5ba18c47bfa3e152bfe9bce5add46d9fe7389e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SzJS/mathlib | 07836ee708ca27cd18347e1e11ce7dd5afb3e926 | 23a5591fca0d43ee5d49d89f6f0ee07a24a6ca29 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,980,332,064 | 1,532,063,841,000 | 1,532,063,841,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,936 | lean | import tactic data.stream.basic data.set.basic data.finset data.multiset
open tactic
universe u
variable {α : Type}
example (s t u : set ℕ) (h : s ⊆ t ∩ u) (h' : u ⊆ s) : u ⊆ s → true :=
begin
dunfold has_subset.subset has_inter.inter at *,
-- trace_state,
intro1, triv
end
example (s t u : set ℕ) (h : s ⊆ t ∩ u) (h' : u ⊆ s) : u ⊆ s → true :=
begin
delta has_subset.subset has_inter.inter at *,
-- trace_state,
intro1, triv
end
example (x y z : ℕ) (h'' : true) (h : 0 + y = x) (h' : 0 + y = z) : x = z + 0 :=
begin
simp at *,
-- trace_state,
rw [←h, ←h']
end
example (x y z : ℕ) (h'' : true) (h : 0 + y = x) (h' : 0 + y = z) : x = z + 0 :=
begin
simp at *,
simp [h] at h',
simp [*]
end
def my_id (x : α) := x
def my_id_def (x : α) : my_id x = x := rfl
example (x y z : ℕ) (h'' : true) (h : 0 + my_id y = x) (h' : 0 + y = z) : x = z + 0 :=
begin
simp [my_id_def] at *, simp [h] at h', simp [*]
end
@[simp] theorem mem_set_of {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ {a | p a} = p a := rfl
-- TODO: write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def {s t : set α} : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := rfl
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem union_subset {s t r : set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
begin
dsimp [subset_def, union_def] at *,
intros x h,
cases h; back_chaining_using_hs
end
theorem subset_inter {s t r : set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t :=
begin
dsimp [subset_def, inter_def] at *,
intros x h,
split; back_chaining_using_hs
end
/- extensionality -/
example : true :=
begin
have : ∀ (s₀ s₁ : set ℕ), s₀ = s₁,
{ intros, ext1,
guard_target x ∈ s₀ ↔ x ∈ s₁,
admit },
have : ∀ (s₀ s₁ : finset ℕ), s₀ = s₁,
{ intros, ext1,
guard_target a ∈ s₀ ↔ a ∈ s₁,
admit },
have : ∀ (s₀ s₁ : multiset ℕ), s₀ = s₁,
{ intros, ext1,
guard_target multiset.count a s₀ = multiset.count a s₁,
admit },
have : ∀ (s₀ s₁ : list ℕ), s₀ = s₁,
{ intros, ext1,
guard_target list.nth s₀ n = list.nth s₁ n,
admit },
have : ∀ (s₀ s₁ : stream ℕ), s₀ = s₁,
{ intros, ext1,
guard_target stream.nth n s₀ = stream.nth n s₁,
admit },
have : ∀ n (s₀ s₁ : array n ℕ), s₀ = s₁,
{ intros, ext1,
guard_target array.read s₀ i = array.read s₁ i,
admit },
trivial
end
/- refine_struct -/
section refine_struct
variables {α} [_inst : monoid α]
include _inst
example : true :=
begin
have : group α,
{ refine_struct { .._inst },
guard_tags _field inv group, admit,
guard_tags _field mul_left_inv group, admit, },
trivial
end
end refine_struct
|
7d24d6e5e997a22c6123a58b850087e904ef31e2 | 0f5090f82d527e0df5bf3adac9f9e2e1d81d71e2 | /src/kenji/polished.lean | e644a06710817acb6896792dbf99485b1e94726f | [] | no_license | apurvanakade/mc2020-lean-projects | 36eb42c4baccc37183635c36f8e1b3afa4ec1230 | 02466225aa629ab1232043bcc0a053a099fdb939 | refs/heads/master | 1,688,791,717,534 | 1,597,874,092,000 | 1,597,874,092,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,803 | lean | import ring_theory.fractional_ideal
import ring_theory.discrete_valuation_ring
import linear_algebra.basic
universes u
open_locale classical
variables (R : Type u) [integral_domain R] (R' : Type u) [comm_ring R']
/-
`local_id_is_id` and the other lemmas probably belong in
`ring_theory/integral_domains` or whatever
For integral domains…
`local_id_is_id` asserts that for any submodule `S` that does not contain `0` induces an `integral_domain` on an `integral_domain`.
`local_at_prime_of_id_is_id` is the same, with the localization being at a prime
`lt_add_nonmem` proves that whenever a ∉ I, I < I+(a)
`zero_prime` is a proof that (0) is a prime ideal
`nonzero_mem_of_gt_bot` is whenever I ≠ ⊥, there exists a nonzero element of I
`ideal_mul_eq_zero` is that whenever I * J = ⊥, either I = ⊥ or J = ⊥.
-/
theorem local_id_is_id (S : submonoid R) (zero_non_mem : ((0 : R) ∉ S)) {f : localization_map S (localization S)} :
is_integral_domain (localization S) :=
begin
split,
{--nontrivial localization (pair ne)
use f.to_fun 1,
use f.to_fun 0,
intro one_eq_zero,
have h2 := (localization_map.eq_iff_exists f).1 one_eq_zero,
cases h2 with c h2,
rw [zero_mul, one_mul] at h2,
rw ← h2 at zero_non_mem,
exact zero_non_mem c.property },
{ exact mul_comm },
{--bulk
intros x y mul_eq_zero,
cases f.surj' x with a akey,
cases f.surj' y with b bkey,
have h1 : x * (f.to_fun( a.snd)) * y * (f.to_fun(b.snd))= 0,
{ rw [mul_assoc x, ← mul_comm y, ← mul_assoc, mul_eq_zero], simp },
rw [akey, mul_assoc, bkey, ← f.map_mul', ← f.map_zero'] at h1,
rw f.eq_iff_exists' at h1,
cases h1 with c h1,
rw [zero_mul, mul_comm] at h1,
have h2 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h1,
cases h2 with c_eq_zero h2,
{ exfalso,
rw ← c_eq_zero at zero_non_mem,
exact zero_non_mem c.property },
replace h2 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h2,
cases h2 with a_eq_zero b_eq_zero,
{ left, rw a_eq_zero at akey,
exact localization_map.eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero f akey rfl },
{ right, rw b_eq_zero at bkey,
exact localization_map.eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero f bkey rfl },
},
end
instance local_at_prime_of_id_is_id (P : ideal R) (hp_prime : P.is_prime) :
integral_domain (localization.at_prime P) :=
begin
have zero_non_mem : (0 : R) ∉ P.prime_compl,
{ have := ideal.zero_mem P, simpa },
have h1 := local_id_is_id R P.prime_compl zero_non_mem,
exact is_integral_domain.to_integral_domain (localization.at_prime P) h1,
exact localization.of (ideal.prime_compl P),
end
lemma lt_add_nonmem (I : ideal R') (a ∉ I) : I < I+ideal.span{a} :=
begin
have blah : ∀ (x y : ideal R'), x ≤ x ⊔ y,
{ intros x y, simp only [le_sup_left],},
split, exact blah I (ideal.span{a}),
have blah2 : ∀ (x y z : ideal R'), x ⊔ y ≤ z → x ≤ z → y ≤ z,
{ intros x y z, simp only [sup_le_iff], tauto,},
have h : I ≤ I, exact le_refl I,
rw ideal.add_eq_sup,
intro bad,
have h1 := blah2 I (ideal.span{a}) I bad h,
have h2 : a ∈ ideal.span{a},
{ rw ideal.mem_span_singleton', use 1, rw one_mul,},
have : ∀ (x ∈ ideal.span{a}), x ∈ I, simpa only [],
exact H (this a h2),
end
--
lemma zero_prime : (⊥ : ideal R).is_prime :=
begin
split,
{
intro,
have h1 := (ideal.eq_top_iff_one) (⊥ : ideal R) ,
rw h1 at a,
have : 1 = (0 : R), tauto,
simpa,
},
{
intros,
have h1 : x * y = 0, tauto,
have x_or_y0 : x = 0 ∨ y = 0,
exact zero_eq_mul.mp (eq.symm h1),
tauto,
},
end
lemma nonzero_mem_of_neq_bot (I : ideal R') (gt_bot : ⊥ < I) : ∃ a : I, a ≠ 0 :=
begin
have h := (submodule.lt_iff_le_and_exists.1 gt_bot).2,
clear gt_bot,
rcases h with ⟨ x, hx, key ⟩,
use [x, hx],
simp only [submodule.mem_bot] at key,
simpa only [ne.def, submodule.mk_eq_zero],
end
lemma ideal_mul_eq_zero {I J : ideal R} : (I * J = ⊥) ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
begin
have hJ : inhabited J, by exact submodule.inhabited J,
have j := inhabited.default J, clear hJ,
split, swap,
{ intros,
cases a,
{rw [← ideal.mul_bot J, a, ideal.mul_comm],},
{rw [← ideal.mul_bot I, a, ideal.mul_comm],},
},
intro hij,
by_cases J = ⊥,
right, exact h,
left,
rw submodule.eq_bot_iff,
intros i hi,
rcases J.ne_bot_iff.1 h with ⟨ j', hj, ne0⟩,
rw submodule.eq_bot_iff at hij,
specialize hij (i * j'),
have := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero ( hij (ideal.mul_mem_mul hi hj)),
cases this, assumption, exfalso, exact ne0 this,
end
theorem set_has_maximal_iff_noetherian {X : Type u} [add_comm_group X] [module R' X] : (∀(a : set $ submodule R' X), a.nonempty → ∃ (M ∈ a), ∀ (I ∈ a), M ≤ I → I=M) ↔ is_noetherian R' X :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ split,
intro I,
let S := {J | J ≤ I ∧ J.fg},
have h2 : S.nonempty, { use (⊥ : submodule R' X), convert submodule.fg_bot, simp },
rcases h S h2 with ⟨ M, ⟨hMI, ⟨Mgen, hMgen⟩⟩, max⟩,
rw submodule.fg_def,
contrapose! max,
have : ∃ x ∈ I, x ∉ M,
{ have := max ↑Mgen (finset.finite_to_set Mgen),
contrapose! this,
rw hMgen, ext, tauto },
rcases this with ⟨x, hxI, hxM⟩,
use submodule.span R' (↑Mgen ∪ {x}), split,
{ split,
{ suffices : (↑Mgen : set X) ∪ {x} ⊆ I, { convert submodule.span_mono this, simp },
have : (↑Mgen : set X) ⊆ M, { convert submodule.subset_span, cc },
apply set.union_subset, { exact set.subset.trans this hMI }, { simp [hxI] } },
{ rw submodule.fg_def, use (↑Mgen ∪ {x}), split, { split, apply_instance,}, refl } },
split,
{ rw ← hMgen, convert submodule.span_mono _, simp },
{ contrapose! hxM, rw ← hxM, apply submodule.subset_span, exact (↑Mgen : set X).mem_union_right rfl,} },
{ rintros A ⟨a, ha⟩,
rw is_noetherian_iff_well_founded at h,
rw rel_embedding.well_founded_iff_no_descending_seq at h,
by_contra hyp,
push_neg at hyp,
apply h,
constructor,
have h' : ∀ (M : submodule R' X), M ∈ A → (∃ (I : submodule R' X), I ∈ A ∧ M < I),
{
intros m mina,
rcases hyp m mina with ⟨I, iina, mlei, mneqi⟩,
use I, split, exact iina, split, exact mlei, intro ilem, apply mneqi, exact le_antisymm ilem mlei,
},
have h'' : ∀ M : A, ∃ I : A, (M : submodule R' X) < I,
{ rintros ⟨M, M_in⟩,
rcases h' M M_in with ⟨I, I_in, hMI⟩,
exact ⟨⟨I, I_in⟩, hMI⟩ },
let f : ℕ → A := λ n, nat.rec_on n ⟨a, ha⟩ (λ n M, classical.some (h'' M)),
exact rel_embedding.nat_gt (coe ∘ f) (λ n, classical.some_spec (h'' $ f n)),
},
end
|
d61b49380382f1b615031a8adf89cb6841112288 | 1dd482be3f611941db7801003235dc84147ec60a | /src/data/nat/enat.lean | 217ea571316087f598b5435e767eb773e26a07f9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sanderdahmen/mathlib | 479039302bd66434bb5672c2a4cecf8d69981458 | 8f0eae75cd2d8b7a083cf935666fcce4565df076 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,491,322,775 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 169,748,224 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,549,636,694,000 | 1,549,636,694,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,759 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
Natural numbers with infinity, represented as roption ℕ.
-/
import data.pfun algebra.ordered_group
open roption lattice
def enat : Type := roption ℕ
namespace enat
instance : has_zero enat := ⟨some 0⟩
instance : has_one enat := ⟨some 1⟩
instance : has_add enat := ⟨λ x y, ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom, λ h, get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance : has_coe ℕ enat := ⟨some⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : decidable (n : enat).dom := is_true trivial
@[simp] lemma coe_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : enat) = y ↔ x = y := roption.some_inj
instance : add_comm_monoid enat :=
{ add := (+),
zero := (0),
add_comm := λ x y, roption.ext' and.comm (λ _ _, add_comm _ _),
zero_add := λ x, roption.ext' (true_and _) (λ _ _, zero_add _),
add_zero := λ x, roption.ext' (and_true _) (λ _ _, add_zero _),
add_assoc := λ x y z, roption.ext' and.assoc (λ _ _, add_assoc _ _ _) }
instance : has_le enat := ⟨λ x y, ∃ h : y.dom → x.dom, ∀ hy : y.dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : has_top enat := ⟨none⟩
instance : has_bot enat := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_sup enat := ⟨λ x y, ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom, λ h, x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma cases_on {P : enat → Prop} : ∀ a : enat,
P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a :=
roption.induction_on
@[simp] lemma top_add (x : enat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
roption.ext' (false_and _) (λ h, h.left.elim)
@[simp] lemma add_top (x : enat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : enat) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℕ) : enat) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add (x y : ℕ) : ((x + y : ℕ) : enat) = x + y :=
roption.ext' (and_true _).symm (λ _ _, rfl)
@[simp] lemma coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : enat} (h : ((x : enat) + y).dom) :
get ((x : enat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma get_add {x y : enat} (h : (x + y).dom) :
get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_get {x : enat} (h : x.dom) : (x.get h : enat) = x :=
roption.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) (λ _ _, rfl)
@[simp] lemma get_zero (h : (0 : enat).dom) : (0 : enat).get h = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma get_one (h : (1 : enat).dom) : (1 : enat).get h = 1 := rfl
lemma dom_of_le_some {x : enat} {y : ℕ} : x ≤ y → x.dom :=
λ ⟨h, _⟩, h trivial
instance : partial_order enat :=
{ le := (≤),
le_refl := λ x, ⟨id, λ _, le_refl _⟩,
le_trans := λ x y z ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩,
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, λ _, le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩,
le_antisymm := λ x y ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩, roption.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩
(λ _ _, le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)) }
@[simp] lemma coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : enat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
⟨λ ⟨_, h⟩, h trivial, λ h, ⟨λ _, trivial, λ _, h⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : enat) < y ↔ x < y :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lt_iff_le_not_le, coe_le_coe, coe_le_coe]
lemma get_le_get {x y : enat} {hx : x.dom} {hy : y.dom} :
x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y :=
by conv { to_lhs, rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_get, coe_get]}
instance semilattice_sup_bot : semilattice_sup_bot enat :=
{ sup := (⊔),
bot := (⊥),
bot_le := λ _, ⟨λ _, trivial, λ _, nat.zero_le _⟩,
le_sup_left := λ _ _, ⟨and.left, λ _, le_sup_left⟩,
le_sup_right := λ _ _, ⟨and.right, λ _, le_sup_right⟩,
sup_le := λ x y z ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, ⟨λ hz, ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩,
λ _, sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩,
..enat.partial_order }
instance order_top : order_top enat :=
{ top := (⊤),
le_top := λ x, ⟨λ h, false.elim h, λ hy, false.elim hy⟩,
..enat.semilattice_sup_bot }
lemma coe_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : enat) < ⊤ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (λ h, absurd (congr_arg dom h) true_ne_false)
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_bot (x : ℕ) : (x : enat) ≠ ⊤ := ne_of_lt (coe_lt_top x)
lemma pos_iff_one_le {x : enat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
enat.cases_on x ⟨λ _, le_top, λ _, coe_lt_top _⟩
(λ n, ⟨λ h, enat.coe_le_coe.2 (enat.coe_lt_coe.1 h),
λ h, enat.coe_lt_coe.2 (enat.coe_le_coe.1 h)⟩)
noncomputable instance : decidable_linear_order enat :=
{ le_total := λ x y, enat.cases_on x
(or.inr le_top) (enat.cases_on y (λ _, or.inl le_top)
(λ x y, (le_total x y).elim (or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2)
(or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))),
decidable_le := classical.dec_rel _,
..enat.partial_order }
noncomputable instance : bounded_lattice enat :=
{ inf := min,
inf_le_left := min_le_left,
inf_le_right := min_le_right,
le_inf := λ _ _ _, le_min,
..enat.order_top,
..enat.semilattice_sup_bot }
lemma sup_eq_max {a b : enat} : a ⊔ b = max a b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
(max_le le_sup_left le_sup_right)
lemma inf_eq_min {a b : enat} : a ⊓ b = min a b := rfl
instance : ordered_comm_monoid enat :=
{ add_le_add_left := λ a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c,
enat.cases_on c (by simp)
(λ c, ⟨λ h, and.intro trivial (h₁ h.2),
λ _, add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩),
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := λ a b c, enat.cases_on a
(λ h, by simpa [lt_irrefl] using h)
(λ a, enat.cases_on b
(λ h, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge (by rw add_top; exact le_top)))
(λ b, enat.cases_on c
(λ _, coe_lt_top _)
(λ c h, coe_lt_coe.2 (by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_add, coe_lt_coe] at h;
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left h)))),
..enat.decidable_linear_order,
..enat.add_comm_monoid }
instance : canonically_ordered_monoid enat :=
{ le_iff_exists_add := λ a b, enat.cases_on b
(iff_of_true le_top ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩)
(λ b, enat.cases_on a
(iff_of_false (not_le_of_gt (coe_lt_top _))
(not_exists.2 (λ x, ne_of_lt (by rw [top_add]; exact coe_lt_top _))))
(λ a, ⟨λ h, ⟨(b - a : ℕ),
by rw [← coe_add, coe_inj, add_comm, nat.sub_add_cancel (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩,
(λ ⟨c, hc⟩, enat.cases_on c
(λ hc, hc.symm ▸ show (a : enat) ≤ a + ⊤, by rw [add_top]; exact le_top)
(λ c (hc : (b : enat) = a + c),
coe_le_coe.2 (by rw [← coe_add, coe_inj] at hc;
rw hc; exact nat.le_add_right _ _)) hc)⟩))
..enat.ordered_comm_monoid }
section with_top
def to_with_top (x : enat) [decidable x.dom]: with_top ℕ := x.to_option
lemma to_with_top_top : to_with_top ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_top' [decidable (⊤ : enat).dom] : to_with_top ⊤ = ⊤ :=
by convert to_with_top_top
lemma to_with_top_zero : to_with_top 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_zero' [decidable (0 : enat).dom]: to_with_top 0 = 0 :=
by convert to_with_top_zero
lemma to_with_top_coe (n : ℕ) : to_with_top n = n := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_coe' (n : ℕ) [decidable (n : enat).dom] : to_with_top (n : enat) = n :=
by convert to_with_top_coe n
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_le {x y : enat} : Π [decidable x.dom]
[decidable y.dom], by exactI to_with_top x ≤ to_with_top y ↔ x ≤ y :=
enat.cases_on y (by simp) (enat.cases_on x (by simp) (by intros; simp))
@[simp] lemma to_with_top_lt {x y : enat} [decidable x.dom] [decidable y.dom] :
to_with_top x < to_with_top y ↔ x < y :=
by simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, to_with_top_le]
end with_top
lemma lt_wf : well_founded ((<) : enat → enat → Prop) :=
show well_founded (λ a b : enat, a < b),
by haveI := classical.dec; simp only [to_with_top_lt.symm] {eta := ff};
exact inv_image.wf _ (with_top.well_founded_lt nat.lt_wf)
instance : has_well_founded enat := ⟨(<), lt_wf⟩
end enat
|
40704a1fa28323336606e42f6deeb93c3c8f1421 | 88fb7558b0636ec6b181f2a548ac11ad3919f8a5 | /tests/lean/run/converter.lean | 8a1a7af1e95812891bca0b9dea58699e286950b1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | moritayasuaki/lean | 9f666c323cb6fa1f31ac597d777914aed41e3b7a | ae96ebf6ee953088c235ff7ae0e8c95066ba8001 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,135,440,814 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 90,269,903 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,493,906,291,000 | 1,493,906,291,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,706 | lean | open tactic conv
open tactic
run_cmd mk_simp_attr `foo
run_cmd mk_simp_attr `bla
constant f : nat → nat → nat
@[foo] lemma f_lemma : ∀ x, f x x = 0 :=
sorry
constant g : nat → nat
@[bla] lemma g_lemma : ∀ x, g x = x :=
sorry
example (a b c : nat) : (λ x, g (f (a + 0) (sizeof x))) a = 0 :=
by conversion $
whnf >>
trace_lhs >>
apply_simp_set `bla >>
dsimp >>
trace "after defeq simplifier" >>
trace_lhs >>
change `(f a a) >>
trace_lhs >>
apply_simp_set `foo >>
trace_lhs
set_option trace.app_builder true
@[simp] lemma sizeof_nat_eq (n : ℕ) : sizeof n = n := rfl
example (a b c : nat) : (λ x, g (f x (sizeof x))) = (λ x, 0) :=
by conversion $
funext $ do
trace_lhs,
apply_simp_set `bla,
dsimp,
apply_simp_set `foo
constant h : nat → nat → nat
lemma ex (a : nat) : (λ a, h (f a (sizeof a)) (g a)) = (λ a, h 0 a) :=
by conversion $
bottom_up $
(apply_simp_set `foo <|> apply_simp_set `bla <|> dsimp)
lemma ex2 {A : Type} [comm_group A] (a b : A) : b * 1 * a = a * b :=
by conversion $
bottom_up (apply_simp_set `default)
lemma ex3 (p q r : Prop) : (p ∧ true ∧ p) = p :=
by conversion $
bottom_up (apply_propext_simp_set `default)
#print "---------"
lemma ex4 (a b c : nat) : g (g (g (f (f (g (g a)) (g (g a))) a))) = g (g (g (f (f a a) a))) :=
by conversion $
findp `(λ x, f (g x) (g x)) $
trace "found pattern" >> trace_lhs >>
bottom_up (apply_simp_set `bla)
lemma ex5 (a b c : nat) : g (g (g (f (f (g (g a)) (g (g a))) a))) = g (g (g (f (f a a) a))) :=
by conversion $
find $
match_expr `(λ x, f (g x) (g x)) >>
trace "found pattern" >> trace_lhs >>
bottom_up (apply_simp_set `bla)
|
0b0c66ad2d1b978ade5bd3a6aa8e9b2991b98664 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/tactic/omega/find_ees.lean | b5be8c3a58484badae1f6bead9e985b4f3aa27ab | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,566 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Seul Baek. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Seul Baek
-/
/-
A tactic for finding a sequence of equality
elimination rules for a given set of constraints.
-/
import tactic.omega.eq_elim
variables {α β : Type}
open tactic
namespace omega
/-- The state of equality elimination proof search. `eqs` is the list of
equality constraints, and each `t ∈ eqs` represents the constraint `0 = t`.
Similarly, `les` is the list of inequality constraints, and each `t ∈ eqs`
represents the constraint `0 < t`. `ees` is the sequence of equality
elimination steps that have been used so far to obtain the current set of
constraints. The list `ees` grows over time until `eqs` becomes empty. -/
@[derive inhabited]
structure ee_state :=
(eqs : list term)
(les : list term)
(ees : list ee)
@[reducible] meta def eqelim := state_t ee_state tactic
meta def abort {α : Type} : eqelim α := ⟨λ x, failed⟩
private meta def mk_eqelim_state
(eqs les : list term) : tactic ee_state :=
return (ee_state.mk eqs les [])
/-- Get the current list of equality constraints. -/
meta def get_eqs : eqelim (list term) := ee_state.eqs <$> get
/-- Get the current list of inequality constraints. -/
meta def get_les : eqelim (list term) := ee_state.les <$> get
/-- Get the current sequence of equality elimiation steps. -/
meta def get_ees : eqelim (list ee) := ee_state.ees <$> get
/-- Update the list of equality constraints. -/
meta def set_eqs (eqs : list term) : eqelim unit := modify $ λ s, {eqs := eqs, ..s}
/-- Update the list of inequality constraints. -/
meta def set_les (les : list term) : eqelim unit := modify $ λ s, {les := les, ..s}
/-- Update the sequence of equality elimiation steps. -/
meta def set_ees (es : list ee) : eqelim unit := modify $ λ s, {ees := es, ..s}
/-- Add a new step to the sequence of equality elimination steps. -/
meta def add_ee (e : ee) : eqelim unit := do
es ← get_ees, set_ees (es ++ [e])
/-- Return the first equality constraint in the current list of
equality constraints. The returned constraint is 'popped' and
no longer available in the state. -/
meta def head_eq : eqelim term :=
do eqs ← get_eqs,
match eqs with
| [] := abort
| (eq::eqs') := set_eqs eqs' >> pure eq
end
meta def run {α : Type} (eqs les : list term) (r : eqelim α) : tactic α :=
prod.fst <$> (mk_eqelim_state eqs les >>= r.run)
/-- If `t1` succeeds and returns a value, 'commit' to that choice and
run `t3` with the returned value as argument. Do not backtrack
to try `t2` even if `t3` fails. If `t1` fails outright, run `t2`. -/
meta def ee_commit (t1 : eqelim α) (t2 : eqelim β)
(t3 : α → eqelim β) : eqelim β :=
do x ← ((t1 >>= return ∘ some) <|> return none),
match x with
| none := t2
| (some a) := t3 a
end
local notation t1 `!>>=` t2 `;` t3 := ee_commit t1 t2 t3
private meta def of_tactic {α : Type} : tactic α → eqelim α := state_t.lift
/-- GCD of all elements of the list. -/
def gcd : list int → nat
| [] := 0
| (i::is) := nat.gcd i.nat_abs (gcd is)
/-- GCD of all coefficients in a term. -/
meta def get_gcd (t : term) : eqelim int :=
pure ↑(gcd t.snd)
/-- Divide a term by an integer if the integer divides
the constant component of the term. It is assumed that
the integer also divides all coefficients of the term. -/
meta def factor (i : int) (t : term) : eqelim term :=
if i ∣ t.fst
then add_ee (ee.factor i) >> pure (t.div i)
else abort
/-- If list has a nonzero element, return the minimum element
(by absolute value) with its index. Otherwise, return none. -/
meta def find_min_coeff_core : list int → eqelim (int × nat)
| [] := abort
| (i::is) := (do
(j,n) ← find_min_coeff_core is,
if i ≠ 0 ∧ i.nat_abs ≤ j.nat_abs
then pure (i,0)
else pure (j,n+1)) <|>
(if i = (0 : int) then abort else pure (i,0))
/-- Find and return the smallest coefficient (by absolute value) in a term,
along with the coefficient's variable index and the term itself.
If the coefficient is negative, negate both the coefficient and the term
before returning them. -/
meta def find_min_coeff (t : term) : eqelim (int × nat × term) :=
do (i,n) ← find_min_coeff_core t.snd,
if 0 < i
then pure (i,n,t)
else add_ee (ee.neg) >> pure (-i,n,t.neg)
/-- Find an appropriate equality elimination step for the
current state and apply it. -/
meta def elim_eq : eqelim unit := do
t ← head_eq,
i ← get_gcd t,
factor i t !>>= (set_eqs [] >> add_ee (ee.nondiv i)) ;
λ s, find_min_coeff s !>>= add_ee ee.drop ;
λ ⟨i, n, u⟩,
if i = 1
then do eqs ← get_eqs,
les ← get_les,
set_eqs (eqs.map (cancel n u)),
set_les (les.map (cancel n u)),
add_ee (ee.cancel n)
else let v : term := coeffs_reduce n u.fst u.snd in
let r : term := rhs n u.fst u.snd in
do eqs ← get_eqs,
les ← get_les,
set_eqs (v::eqs.map (subst n r)),
set_les (les.map (subst n r)),
add_ee (ee.reduce n),
elim_eq
/-- Find and return the sequence of steps for eliminating
all equality constraints in the current state. -/
meta def elim_eqs : eqelim (list ee) :=
elim_eq !>>= get_ees ; λ _, elim_eqs
/-- Given a linear constrain clause, return a list of steps for eliminating its equality constraints. -/
meta def find_ees : clause → tactic (list ee)
| (eqs,les) := run eqs les elim_eqs
end omega
|
dfccdac6be1d9d66d28d07dc5f686c0da011af54 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/fintype/sort.lean | 81e53c957ecd5dc8453aa920cc83b2bda8140b51 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 848 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.fintype.basic
import data.finset.sort
variables {α : Type*}
open finset
/-- Given a linearly ordered fintype `α` of cardinal `k`, the equiv `mono_equiv_of_fin α h`
is the increasing bijection between `fin k` and `α`. Here, `h` is a proof that
the cardinality of `s` is `k`. We use this instead of a map `fin s.card → α` to avoid
casting issues in further uses of this function. -/
noncomputable def mono_equiv_of_fin (α) [fintype α] [linear_order α] {k : ℕ}
(h : fintype.card α = k) : fin k ≃ α :=
equiv.of_bijective (mono_of_fin univ h) begin
apply set.bijective_iff_bij_on_univ.2,
rw ← @coe_univ α _,
exact mono_of_fin_bij_on (univ : finset α) h
end
|
228ea3dbba650402ddacaa8cbfff6300d08caa72 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/data/rbtree/basic_auto.lean | e0f42ca4e0802bd7b583969d88e1b513c2ab10f9 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,669 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.data.ordering.default
universes u l v
namespace Mathlib
inductive rbnode (α : Type u) where
| leaf : rbnode α
| red_node : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α
| black_node : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α
namespace rbnode
inductive color where
| red : color
| black : color
protected instance color.decidable_eq : DecidableEq color :=
fun (a b : color) =>
color.cases_on a (color.cases_on b (is_true rfl) (isFalse sorry))
(color.cases_on b (isFalse sorry) (is_true rfl))
def depth {α : Type u} (f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) : rbnode α → ℕ := sorry
protected def min {α : Type u} : rbnode α → Option α := sorry
protected def max {α : Type u} : rbnode α → Option α := sorry
def fold {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β → β) : rbnode α → β → β := sorry
def rev_fold {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β → β) : rbnode α → β → β := sorry
def balance1 {α : Type u} : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α := sorry
def balance1_node {α : Type u} : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α := sorry
def balance2 {α : Type u} : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α := sorry
def balance2_node {α : Type u} : rbnode α → α → rbnode α → rbnode α := sorry
def get_color {α : Type u} : rbnode α → color := sorry
def ins {α : Type u} (lt : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel lt] : rbnode α → α → rbnode α := sorry
def mk_insert_result {α : Type u} : color → rbnode α → rbnode α := sorry
def insert {α : Type u} (lt : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel lt] (t : rbnode α) (x : α) : rbnode α :=
mk_insert_result (get_color t) (ins lt t x)
def mem {α : Type u} (lt : α → α → Prop) : α → rbnode α → Prop := sorry
def mem_exact {α : Type u} : α → rbnode α → Prop := sorry
def find {α : Type u} (lt : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel lt] : rbnode α → α → Option α := sorry
inductive well_formed {α : Type u} (lt : α → α → Prop) : rbnode α → Prop where
| leaf_wff : well_formed lt leaf
| insert_wff :
∀ {n n' : rbnode α} {x : α} [_inst_1 : DecidableRel lt],
well_formed lt n → n' = insert lt n x → well_formed lt n'
end rbnode
def rbtree (α : Type u)
(lt :
autoParam (α → α → Prop)
(Lean.Syntax.ident Lean.SourceInfo.none (String.toSubstring "Mathlib.rbtree.default_lt")
(Lean.Name.mkStr
(Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous "Mathlib") "rbtree") "default_lt")
[])) :=
Subtype fun (t : rbnode α) => rbnode.well_formed lt t
def mk_rbtree (α : Type u)
(lt :
autoParam (α → α → Prop)
(Lean.Syntax.ident Lean.SourceInfo.none (String.toSubstring "Mathlib.rbtree.default_lt")
(Lean.Name.mkStr
(Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous "Mathlib") "rbtree") "default_lt")
[])) :
rbtree α :=
{ val := rbnode.leaf, property := rbnode.well_formed.leaf_wff }
namespace rbtree
protected def mem {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} (a : α) (t : rbtree α) :=
rbnode.mem lt a (subtype.val t)
protected instance has_mem {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} : has_mem α (rbtree α) :=
has_mem.mk rbtree.mem
def mem_exact {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} (a : α) (t : rbtree α) :=
rbnode.mem_exact a (subtype.val t)
def depth {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} (f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) (t : rbtree α) : ℕ :=
rbnode.depth f (subtype.val t)
def fold {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} (f : α → β → β) : rbtree α → β → β := sorry
def rev_fold {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} (f : α → β → β) : rbtree α → β → β :=
sorry
def empty {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} : rbtree α → Bool := sorry
def to_list {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} : rbtree α → List α := sorry
protected def min {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} : rbtree α → Option α := sorry
protected def max {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} : rbtree α → Option α := sorry
protected instance has_repr {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} [has_repr α] : has_repr (rbtree α) :=
sorry
def insert {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] : rbtree α → α → rbtree α := sorry
def find {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] : rbtree α → α → Option α := sorry
def contains {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] (t : rbtree α) (a : α) : Bool :=
option.is_some (find t a)
def from_list {α : Type u} (l : List α)
(lt :
autoParam (α → α → Prop)
(Lean.Syntax.ident Lean.SourceInfo.none (String.toSubstring "Mathlib.rbtree.default_lt")
(Lean.Name.mkStr
(Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous "Mathlib") "rbtree") "default_lt")
[]))
[DecidableRel lt] : rbtree α :=
list.foldl insert (mk_rbtree α) l
end rbtree
def rbtree_of {α : Type u} (l : List α)
(lt :
autoParam (α → α → Prop)
(Lean.Syntax.ident Lean.SourceInfo.none (String.toSubstring "Mathlib.rbtree.default_lt")
(Lean.Name.mkStr
(Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous "Mathlib") "rbtree") "default_lt")
[]))
[DecidableRel lt] : rbtree α :=
rbtree.from_list l
end Mathlib |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.