|
|
--- |
|
|
pretty_name: OrgStrategy Reasoning 1k (v2) |
|
|
license: cc-by-4.0 |
|
|
language: |
|
|
- en |
|
|
task_categories: |
|
|
- text-generation |
|
|
tags: |
|
|
- business |
|
|
- strategy |
|
|
- consulting |
|
|
- operations |
|
|
- chain-of-thought |
|
|
- reasoning |
|
|
- frameworks |
|
|
- management |
|
|
size_categories: |
|
|
- 1K<n<10K |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
# OrgStrategy Reasoning 1k (v2) |
|
|
|
|
|
## What This Dataset Is About |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset contains **1,000 real-world business strategy scenarios** with structured reasoning chains that teach AI models to apply proven strategic frameworks to complex organizational problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Core Purpose |
|
|
- **Train models to think strategically** using established business frameworks |
|
|
- **Provide structured reasoning patterns** for complex problem-solving |
|
|
- **Bridge the gap** between generic AI responses and domain-specific strategic analysis |
|
|
- **Enable AI assistants** to provide consultant-quality strategic advice |
|
|
|
|
|
### Why This Dataset Matters |
|
|
|
|
|
**The Problem:** Most AI models give generic business advice without applying proven strategic frameworks. They lack the structured thinking that consultants use to solve complex organizational challenges. |
|
|
|
|
|
**The Solution:** This dataset teaches models to: |
|
|
1. **Identify the right framework** for each problem type |
|
|
2. **Apply structured analysis** (problem decomposition, root cause analysis, strategic options) |
|
|
3. **Generate actionable plans** with owners, timelines, and budgets |
|
|
4. **Think like a consultant** using proven methodologies |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
### Columns |
|
|
- **`prompt`**: Business problem with context (sector, metrics, budget, timeline) |
|
|
- **`reasoning`**: Structured analysis using the specified framework |
|
|
- **`solution`**: Actionable implementation plan |
|
|
- **`framework`**: Strategic framework applied (e.g., "Disruptive Innovation", "Blue Ocean") |
|
|
- **`scenario_type`**: Problem category (finance, people, process, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
### Framework Distribution |
|
|
The dataset covers 9 major strategic frameworks: |
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Competitive Advantage** (124 cases) - Cost leadership vs differentiation strategies |
|
|
2. **7 Powers** (121 cases) - Scale economies, network effects, switching costs |
|
|
3. **Lean** (116 cases) - Waste elimination, value stream optimization |
|
|
4. **Blue Ocean** (115 cases) - Creating uncontested market space |
|
|
5. **Playing To Win** (110 cases) - 5 strategic choices framework |
|
|
6. **Five Forces** (108 cases) - Porter's industry structure analysis |
|
|
7. **Good Strategy** (108 cases) - Diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent actions |
|
|
8. **Disruptive Innovation** (106 cases) - Christensen's disruption theory |
|
|
9. **Systems Thinking** (92 cases) - Holistic problem-solving approach |
|
|
|
|
|
### Scenario Types |
|
|
- **Finance** (181) - Revenue, costs, profitability challenges |
|
|
- **People** (176) - HR, talent, organizational development |
|
|
- **Supply** (175) - Supply chain, procurement, logistics |
|
|
- **Process** (174) - Operations, workflows, efficiency |
|
|
- **Customer** (151) - Customer experience, satisfaction |
|
|
- **Technology** (143) - Digital transformation, IT challenges |
|
|
|
|
|
## Example Entry |
|
|
|
|
|
### Prompt |
|
|
``` |
|
|
Healthcare sector: orders processed worsened from 120units/day to 80units/day because of Cycle time increased due to long queues and poor coordination across departments. Budget: $0.41M. Timeline: 5 months. Apply Disruptive Innovation. |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Framework Applied |
|
|
**Disruptive Innovation** - Focuses on simpler, cheaper solutions that start in overlooked segments and move upmarket |
|
|
|
|
|
### Reasoning Structure |
|
|
```xml |
|
|
<strategic_analysis> |
|
|
**Framework:** Disruptive Innovation |
|
|
|
|
|
Disruptive innovation describes how simpler, more affordable solutions initially target overlooked segments and then move upmarket, eventually displacing established products. |
|
|
|
|
|
**Problem Decomposition:** Cycle time increased due to long queues and poor coordination across departments. |
|
|
|
|
|
**Organizational Impact:** |
|
|
- Marketing team: 7 FTEs |
|
|
- Operations team: 12 FTEs |
|
|
- IT team: 5 FTEs |
|
|
|
|
|
**Root Cause Analysis:** |
|
|
1. Manual approval processes creating bottlenecks |
|
|
2. Lack of cross-department coordination |
|
|
3. Outdated workflow systems |
|
|
|
|
|
**Strategic Options:** |
|
|
1. Implement automated workflow system (Disruptive approach) |
|
|
2. Redesign approval processes (Sustaining approach) |
|
|
3. Cross-train staff for flexibility (Hybrid approach) |
|
|
</strategic_analysis> |
|
|
|
|
|
<action_plan> |
|
|
1. Deploy automated workflow platform (Owner: IT Director; Timeline: 8 weeks; Budget: $0.15M) |
|
|
2. Implement cross-department coordination protocols (Owner: Operations Manager; Timeline: 4 weeks; Budget: $0.05M) |
|
|
3. Train staff on new systems (Owner: HR Director; Timeline: 6 weeks; Budget: $0.08M) |
|
|
</action_plan> |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## How Strategic Frameworks Are Applied |
|
|
|
|
|
Each framework provides a **structured lens** for analysis: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Disruptive Innovation**: Simpler, cheaper solutions starting in overlooked segments |
|
|
- **Blue Ocean**: Eliminate competition by creating new market space |
|
|
- **Five Forces**: Analyze industry structure (suppliers, buyers, substitutes, new entrants, rivalry) |
|
|
- **7 Powers**: Identify structural advantages (scale, network effects, switching costs) |
|
|
- **Lean**: Eliminate waste and optimize value streams |
|
|
- **Systems Thinking**: View problems holistically across interconnected parts |
|
|
- **Competitive Advantage**: Choose between cost leadership and differentiation |
|
|
- **Playing To Win**: Make 5 strategic choices (aspiration, where to play, how to win, capabilities, systems) |
|
|
- **Good Strategy**: Diagnose, create guiding policy, design coherent actions |
|
|
|
|
|
## Intended Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
### Primary Applications |
|
|
- **Train strategic reasoning models** for business consulting |
|
|
- **Fine-tune LLMs** for structured problem-solving |
|
|
- **Develop AI consultants** that apply proven frameworks |
|
|
- **Create strategic planning assistants** for organizations |
|
|
|
|
|
### Research Applications |
|
|
- **Study framework application patterns** across different problem types |
|
|
- **Analyze reasoning chain effectiveness** in strategic decision-making |
|
|
- **Develop evaluation metrics** for strategic reasoning quality |
|
|
- **Compare framework performance** across scenarios |
|
|
|
|
|
## Usage Examples |
|
|
|
|
|
### Basic Loading |
|
|
```python |
|
|
from datasets import load_dataset |
|
|
|
|
|
# Load the dataset |
|
|
ds = load_dataset("Wildstash/OrgStrategy-Reasoning-1k-v2", split="train") |
|
|
print(f"Dataset size: {len(ds)}") |
|
|
print(f"Columns: {ds.column_names}") |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Filter by Framework |
|
|
```python |
|
|
# Get all Disruptive Innovation cases |
|
|
disruptive_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['framework'] == 'Disruptive Innovation') |
|
|
print(f"Disruptive Innovation cases: {len(disruptive_cases)}") |
|
|
|
|
|
# Get all Blue Ocean Strategy cases |
|
|
blue_ocean_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['framework'] == 'Blue Ocean') |
|
|
print(f"Blue Ocean cases: {len(blue_ocean_cases)}") |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Filter by Scenario Type |
|
|
```python |
|
|
# Get finance-related scenarios |
|
|
finance_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['scenario_type'] == 'finance') |
|
|
print(f"Finance scenarios: {len(finance_cases)}") |
|
|
|
|
|
# Get process optimization cases |
|
|
process_cases = ds.filter(lambda x: x['scenario_type'] == 'process') |
|
|
print(f"Process scenarios: {len(process_cases)}") |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Training Example |
|
|
```python |
|
|
# Example training loop for strategic reasoning |
|
|
for example in ds: |
|
|
prompt = example['prompt'] |
|
|
reasoning = example['reasoning'] |
|
|
solution = example['solution'] |
|
|
framework = example['framework'] |
|
|
|
|
|
# Use this for fine-tuning your model |
|
|
training_example = { |
|
|
"instruction": f"Apply {framework} framework to solve this business problem: {prompt}", |
|
|
"response": f"{reasoning}\n\n{solution}" |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation Example |
|
|
```python |
|
|
# Evaluate model's framework application |
|
|
def evaluate_framework_usage(model_output, expected_framework): |
|
|
return expected_framework.lower() in model_output.lower() |
|
|
|
|
|
# Test on a sample |
|
|
sample = ds[0] |
|
|
model_response = your_model.generate(sample['prompt']) |
|
|
framework_correct = evaluate_framework_usage(model_response, sample['framework']) |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
### Validation |
|
|
- **Framework consistency**: Each entry applies the specified framework correctly |
|
|
- **Reasoning structure**: Structured analysis follows consistent patterns |
|
|
- **Actionability**: Solutions include owners, timelines, and budgets |
|
|
- **Diversity**: Covers multiple sectors, problem types, and frameworks |
|
|
|
|
|
### Limitations |
|
|
- **English only**: All content is in English |
|
|
- **Business focus**: Primarily corporate/organizational scenarios |
|
|
- **Framework scope**: Limited to 9 major strategic frameworks |
|
|
- **Synthetic elements**: Some scenarios may be constructed for training purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
|
|
|
|
If you use this dataset, please cite: |
|
|
|
|
|
```bibtex |
|
|
@dataset{wildstash_orgstrategy_2025, |
|
|
title={OrgStrategy Reasoning 1k (v2): Business Strategy Scenarios with Structured Reasoning}, |
|
|
author={Wildstash}, |
|
|
year={2025}, |
|
|
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/Wildstash/OrgStrategy-Reasoning-1k-v2}, |
|
|
license={CC-BY-4.0} |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## License |
|
|
CC-BY-4.0 - You are free to use, modify, and distribute this dataset for any purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|