text stringlengths 6 2.91M |
|---|
["36b569f069fe63c86cf9124a94be4ee0e08dba5e"] |
{
"first_traded_price": 8870.0,
"highest_price": 8870.0,
"isin": "IRO1PSIR0001",
"last_traded_price": 8266.0,
"lowest_price": 8266.0,
"trade_volume": 995219.0,
"unix_time": 1455580800
} |
{"artist": "Russ Freeman", "timestamp": "2011-09-07 15:14:46.717427", "similars": [], "tags": [], "track_id": "TRTQSFS128F428C42D", "title": "From The Redwoods To The Rockies"} |
{
"add": {
"doc": {
"id": "73f17aec25f9b97b2f454753d289a747bb8be3d3e2694c725392ee4cb00614fd",
"url": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/Gw_donkeykong_trans.png/150px-Gw_donkeykong_trans.png",
"previous": " ",
"after": " Donkey Kong Donk Kongu is an arcade game that was released by Nintendo in 1981 The game is an early example of the platform genre as the gameplay focuses on maneuvering the main character across a series of platforms while dodging obstacles The storyline is thin but well developed for its time In it Mario originally called Jumpman must rescue a damsel in distress Pauline from a giant ape named Donkey Kong The hero and ape went on to become two of Nintendo s more popular characters ",
"color": "tomato|0.30318 salmon|0.22012 light|0.058954 pink|0.058954 coral|0.052131 pink|0.038536 light|0.037865 coral|0.037865 rosy|0.033677 brown|0.033677 dark|0.032563 gray|0.032563 dark|0.032563 grey|0.032563 gray|0.02574 grey|0.02574 dim|0.02567 gray|0.02567 dim|0.02567 grey|0.02567 silver|0.02276 indian|0.012949 red|0.012949 dark|0.012564 salmon|0.012564 light|0.01215 gray|0.01215 light|0.01215 grey|0.01215 honeydew|0.008167 gainsboro|0.0080298 misty|0.0072847 rose|0.0072847 powder|0.0071828 blue|0.0071828 thistle|0.0065946 lavender|0.0065352 light|0.0054306 salmon|0.0054306 light|0.0049211 steel|0.0049211 blue|0.0049211 dark|0.0042003 slate|0.0042003 gray|0.0042003 lavender|0.0041129 blush|0.0041129 ",
"after_weights": " Donkey|1 Kong|0.98851 Donk|0.97701 Kongu|0.96552 is|0.95402 an|0.94253 arcade|0.93103 game|0.91954 that|0.90805 was|0.89655 released|0.88506 by|0.87356 Nintendo|0.86207 in|0.85057 1981|0.83908 The|0.82759 game|0.81609 is|0.8046 an|0.7931 early|0.78161 example|0.77011 of|0.75862 the|0.74713 platform|0.73563 genre|0.72414 as|0.71264 the|0.70115 gameplay|0.68966 focuses|0.67816 on|0.66667 maneuvering|0.65517 the|0.64368 main|0.63218 character|0.62069 across|0.6092 a|0.5977 series|0.58621 of|0.57471 platforms|0.56322 while|0.55172 dodging|0.54023 obstacles|0.52874 The|0.51724 storyline|0.50575 is|0.49425 thin|0.48276 but|0.47126 well|0.45977 developed|0.44828 for|0.43678 its|0.42529 time|0.41379 In|0.4023 it|0.3908 Mario|0.37931 originally|0.36782 called|0.35632 Jumpman|0.34483 must|0.33333 rescue|0.32184 a|0.31034 damsel|0.29885 in|0.28736 distress|0.27586 Pauline|0.26437 from|0.25287 a|0.24138 giant|0.22989 ape|0.21839 named|0.2069 Donkey|0.1954 Kong|0.18391 The|0.17241 hero|0.16092 and|0.14943 ape|0.13793 went|0.12644 on|0.11494 to|0.10345 become|0.091954 two|0.08046 of|0.068966 Nintendo|0.057471 s|0.045977 more|0.034483 popular|0.022989 characters|0.011494 |0",
"previous_weights": " "
}
}
}
|
{
"vorgangId": "148946",
"VORGANG": {
"WAHLPERIODE": "12",
"VORGANGSTYP": "Große Anfrage",
"TITEL": "Ökologischer Gesundheitsschutz (G-SIG: 12011030)",
"INITIATIVE": "Fraktion der SPD",
"AKTUELLER_STAND": "Beantwortet",
"SIGNATUR": "",
"GESTA_ORDNUNGSNUMMER": "",
"WICHTIGE_DRUCKSACHE": [
{
"DRS_HERAUSGEBER": "BT",
"DRS_NUMMER": "12/3385",
"DRS_TYP": "Große Anfrage",
"DRS_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btd/12/033/1203385.pdf"
},
{
"DRS_HERAUSGEBER": "BT",
"DRS_NUMMER": "12/6128",
"DRS_TYP": "Antwort",
"DRS_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btd/12/061/1206128.pdf"
}
],
"PLENUM": {
"PLPR_KLARTEXT": "Beratung",
"PLPR_HERAUSGEBER": "BT",
"PLPR_NUMMER": "12/235",
"PLPR_SEITEN": "20611A - 20629B",
"PLPR_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btp/12/12235.pdf#P.20611"
},
"EU_DOK_NR": "",
"SACHGEBIET": [
"Umwelt",
"Gesundheit"
],
"SCHLAGWORT": [
"Arzt",
"Cadmium",
"Emissionskataster",
"Forschungsförderung",
"Gesundheit",
"Gesundheitsvorsorge",
"Halogenkohlenwasserstoff",
"Krebsregister",
"Luftreinhaltung",
"Muttermilch",
"Ökologie",
"Umweltepidemiologie",
"Umweltschutz",
"Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung",
"Zusatzstoff in Lebensmitteln"
],
"ABSTRAKT": "Entwicklung der Umweltepidemiologie, Weiterführung des DDR-Krebsregisters, Forschungsförderung in der Umweltmedizin, Produktlinienanalyse und Lebensmittel-Monitoring, Immissionskataster, Cadmiumbelastung, Organohalogenbelastung der Muttermilch, Weiterentwicklung der Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung zur Gesundheitsverträglichkeitsprüfung, Umweltmedizin in der ärztlichen Ausbildung "
},
"VORGANGSABLAUF": {
"VORGANGSPOSITION": [
{
"ZUORDNUNG": "BT",
"URHEBER": "Große Anfrage, Urheber : Fraktion der SPD ",
"FUNDSTELLE": "07.10.1992 - BT-Drucksache 12/3385",
"FUNDSTELLE_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btd/12/033/1203385.pdf",
"PERSOENLICHER_URHEBER": [
{
"VORNAME": "Klaus",
"NACHNAME": "Lennartz",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "SPD",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Große Anfrage"
},
{
"VORNAME": "Klaus",
"NACHNAME": "Kirschner",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "SPD",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Große Anfrage"
}
]
},
{
"ZUORDNUNG": "BT",
"URHEBER": "Antwort, Urheber : Bundesregierung, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (federführend)",
"FUNDSTELLE": "11.11.1993 - BT-Drucksache 12/6128",
"FUNDSTELLE_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btd/12/061/1206128.pdf"
},
{
"ZUORDNUNG": "BT",
"URHEBER": "Beratung",
"FUNDSTELLE": "23.06.1994 - BT-Plenarprotokoll 12/235, S. 20611A - 20629B",
"FUNDSTELLE_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btp/12/12235.pdf#P.20611",
"PERSOENLICHER_URHEBER": [
{
"PERSON_TITEL": "Dr.",
"VORNAME": "Klaus W.",
"NACHNAME": "Lippold",
"WAHLKREISZUSATZ": "Offenbach",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "CDU/CSU",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20613C-20615A"
},
{
"VORNAME": "Monika",
"NACHNAME": "Ganseforth",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "SPD",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20615A-20616B"
},
{
"VORNAME": "Gerhart Rudolf",
"NACHNAME": "Baum",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "FDP",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20616C-20618B"
},
{
"VORNAME": "Petra",
"NACHNAME": "Bläss",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "PDS/LL",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20618B-20619B"
},
{
"PERSON_TITEL": "Dr.",
"VORNAME": "Klaus-Dieter",
"NACHNAME": "Feige",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20619B-20621A"
},
{
"PERSON_TITEL": "Dr.",
"VORNAME": "Peter",
"NACHNAME": "Paziorek",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "CDU/CSU",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20621A-20622B"
},
{
"VORNAME": "Michael",
"NACHNAME": "Müller",
"WAHLKREISZUSATZ": "Düsseldorf",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "SPD",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20622B-20624B"
},
{
"PERSON_TITEL": "Dr.",
"VORNAME": "Norbert",
"NACHNAME": "Rieder",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "CDU/CSU",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20624B-20625A"
},
{
"PERSON_TITEL": "Dr.",
"VORNAME": "Klaus",
"NACHNAME": "Töpfer",
"FUNKTION": "Bundesmin.",
"RESSORT": "Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20625A-20627A"
},
{
"PERSON_TITEL": "Dr.",
"VORNAME": "Ulrich",
"NACHNAME": "Briefs",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "fraktionslos",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Rede",
"SEITE": "20627A-D"
}
]
}
]
}
}
|
{
"first_traded_price": 2550.0,
"highest_price": 2560.0,
"isin": "IRO1DJBR0001",
"last_traded_price": 2550.0,
"lowest_price": 2550.0,
"trade_volume": 591078.0,
"unix_time": 1352592000
} |
{
"automerge": "minor",
"extends": [":app"]
}
|
{"name":"VBS Holdings LLC","permalink":"vbs-holdings-llc","crunchbase_url":"http://www.crunchbase.com/company/vbs-holdings-llc","homepage_url":"http://www.interviewtrail.com","blog_url":"http://myinterviewtrail.blogspot.com","blog_feed_url":"http://myinterviewtrail.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss","twitter_username":null,"category_code":"web","number_of_employees":4,"founded_year":2006,"founded_month":6,"founded_day":1,"deadpooled_year":null,"deadpooled_month":null,"deadpooled_day":null,"deadpooled_url":null,"tag_list":"residency, residency-rankings, hospitals, hospital-rankings, residency-reviews, residency-interviews, medical-school, medical-students, medicine","alias_list":null,"email_address":"adam@interviewtrail.com","phone_number":"585 615-0432","description":null,"created_at":"Tue Aug 26 02:35:33 UTC 2008","updated_at":"Wed Feb 17 21:02:37 UTC 2010","overview":"<p>InterviewTrail.com generates hospital rankings based on aggregate data submitted by residency applicants. </p>\n\n<p>Each year over 40,000 medical students apply for U.S. residency positions. They submit their hospital rankings to a centralized service, with the hopes of matching at their number one program. But the rankings are put into a lockbox. No one knows how the hospitals are actually ranked.</p>\n\n<p>Until now, the U.S. News and World Report has been the only source for hospital rankings. But by aggregating hospital rankings among our members, we make the hospital rankings game completely objective. </p>\n\n<p>Not only do we provide patients, medical students and doctors with a true aggregation of the best hospitals, but delving a little deeper into the data enables us to tell individual medical students their chances of getting a job at their top hospital -AND- show hospital administrators which other hospitals are competing with them for applicants.</p>\n\n<p>In addition, InterviewTrail.com acts as a TripIt for the 40,000 residency applicants who travel the nation each year. InterviewTrail.com saves money for applicants through a travel affiliation with Expedia.</p>\n\n<p>At its core, InterviewTrail.com is a source for hospital rankings based on legitimate, objective ranking data. Through the mass collaboration of over 40,000 of the world’s newest doctors each year, InterviewTrail.com aims to redefine the “Best Hospitals” in the U.S.</p>","image":{"available_sizes":[[[150,41],"assets/images/resized/0002/4340/24340v2-max-150x150.png"],[[250,68],"assets/images/resized/0002/4340/24340v2-max-250x250.png"],[[320,88],"assets/images/resized/0002/4340/24340v2-max-450x450.png"]],"attribution":null},"products":[{"name":"InterviewTrail.com","permalink":"interviewtrail-com","image":null}],"relationships":[{"is_past":false,"title":"CTO","person":{"first_name":"Michael","last_name":"Leung","permalink":"michael-leung","image":{"available_sizes":[[[67,150],"assets/images/resized/0002/4341/24341v2-max-150x150.jpg"],[[113,250],"assets/images/resized/0002/4341/24341v2-max-250x250.jpg"],[[152,336],"assets/images/resized/0002/4341/24341v2-max-450x450.jpg"]],"attribution":""}}},{"is_past":false,"title":"President","person":{"first_name":"Adam","last_name":"J. Oppenheimer","permalink":"adam-j-oppenheimer","image":{"available_sizes":[[[119,150],"assets/images/resized/0002/8872/28872v2-max-150x150.png"],[[199,250],"assets/images/resized/0002/8872/28872v2-max-250x250.png"],[[250,313],"assets/images/resized/0002/8872/28872v2-max-450x450.png"]],"attribution":""}}}],"competitions":[],"providerships":[],"total_money_raised":"$0","funding_rounds":[],"investments":[],"acquisition":null,"acquisitions":[],"offices":[],"milestones":[],"ipo":null,"video_embeds":[],"screenshots":[],"external_links":[]} |
{"draft":"draft-ogier-ospf-dbex-opt-03","doc_id":"RFC5243","title":"OSPF Database Exchange Summary List Optimization","authors":["R. Ogier"],"format":["ASCII","HTML"],"page_count":"5","pub_status":"INFORMATIONAL","status":"INFORMATIONAL","source":"IETF - NON WORKING GROUP","abstract":"This document describes a backward-compatible optimization for the\r\nDatabase Exchange process in OSPFv2 and OSPFv3. In this optimization,\r\na router does not list a Link State Advertisement (LSA) in Database\r\nDescription packets sent to a neighbor, if the same or a more recent\r\ninstance of the LSA was listed in a Database Description packet\r\nalready received from the neighbor. This optimization reduces\r\nDatabase Description overhead by about 50% in large networks. This\r\noptimization does not affect synchronization, since it only omits\r\nunnecessary information from Database Description packets. This memo \r\nprovides information for the Internet community.","pub_date":"May 2008","keywords":[],"obsoletes":[],"obsoleted_by":[],"updates":[],"updated_by":[],"see_also":[],"doi":"10.17487\/RFC5243","errata_url":"https:\/\/www.rfc-editor.org\/errata\/rfc5243"} |
[[["woman", 2464], ["president", 1152], ["won", 1092], ["you're", 1067], ["would", 1053], ["binder", 1043], ["great", 999], ["think", 987], ["tonight's", 977], ["black", 959], ["poor", 924], ["mexican", 917], ["student", 914], ["gay", 912], ["dog", 908], ["unless", 904], ["presidency", 898], ["like", 678], ["full", 660], ["candy", 568], ["tonight", 514], ["say", 512], ["crowley", 456], ["libya", 435], ["one", 382], ["job", 372], ["presidential", 359], ["don't", 349], ["doesn't", 348], ["new", 340], ["time", 338], ["right", 335], ["question", 313], ["fact", 306], ["get", 300], ["people", 281], ["keeping", 262], ["stop", 255], ["video", 252], ["big", 239], ["moderator", 238], ["listen", 231], ["guy", 220], ["second", 218], ["main", 214], ["watch", 209], ["change", 208], ["love", 207], ["candidate", 199], ["takeaway", 198], ["climate", 190], ["answer", 178], ["actually", 171], ["vote", 168], ["gun", 159], ["parent", 159], ["news", 158], ["good", 157], ["high", 150], ["it's", 149], ["tweet", 146], ["audience", 146], ["home", 142], ["ecosystem", 138], ["know", 138], ["twitter", 138], ["sure", 136], ["friend", 134], ["need", 134], ["didn't", 133], ["abrupt", 132], ["worse", 131], ["going", 128], ["said", 124], ["can't", 119], ["comment", 118], ["back", 116], ["saying", 114], ["every", 113], ["school", 111], ["minute", 108], ["got", 107], ["long", 102], ["really", 101], ["group", 100], ["pool", 100], ["reminds", 99], ["bird", 99], ["food", 98], ["thing", 97], ["view", 96], ["swimming", 96], ["make", 95], ["end", 94], ["coal", 92], ["water", 90], ["voter", 89], ["number", 89], ["text", 89], ["fox", 89]], [["@chrisrockoz", 1503], ["@huffingtonpost", 920], ["@mittromney", 323], ["@barackobama", 259], ["@bbcworld", 189], ["@chrisdelia", 182], ["@onionpolitics", 168], ["@abc", 157], ["@romneyresponse", 150], ["@dickmorristweet", 149], ["@romneysbinder", 139], ["@gabbybirchak", 131], ["@cnn", 124], ["@cenkuygur", 116], ["@yahoonews", 116], ["@kerstinshamberg", 110], ["@shelbywhite", 106], ["@karlrove", 102], ["@kim", 100], ["@crowleycnn", 92], ["@ajenglish", 77], ["@gov", 75], ["@grrr", 73], ["@romneybinders", 72], ["@reince", 71], ["@politicoroger", 70], ["@darthvader", 60], ["@marieclaire", 58], ["@itswillyferrell", 55], ["@annmcelhinney", 53], ["@littleslav", 53], ["@angelikuh", 53], ["@cbsnews", 51], ["@producermatthew", 48], ["@teamromney", 48], ["@occupywallst", 48], ["@mikedrucker", 45], ["@nydailynews", 44], ["@upworthy", 44], ["@bernardgoldberg", 40], ["@toddbarry", 40], ["@dominicnanni", 38], ["@jordansekulow", 38], ["@yerdua", 36], ["@gop", 34], ["@cracked", 33], ["@ajstream", 32], ["@hofstrau", 32], ["@huffpostpol", 31], ["@mcuban", 31], ["@megynkelly", 30], ["@jesseinoh", 30], ["@cosmopolitan", 29], ["@tyleroakley", 28], ["@newsninja2012", 28], ["@indecision", 28], ["@rncresearch", 27], ["@reuterspolitics", 27], ["@huffpostmedia", 25], ["@bbcbreaking", 24], ["@msnbc", 24], ["@cschweitz", 23], ["@lukewearechange", 23], ["@melissafleis", 23], ["@bad", 22], ["@keahukahuanui", 22], ["@erik", 21], ["@lizzwinstead", 21], ["@chrishelman", 20], ["@grauface", 20], ["@carloscreates", 20], ["@democracynow", 19], ["@robdelaney", 19], ["@gurmeetsingh", 18], ["@dennygirltwo", 18], ["@simonhelberg", 18], ["@jillstein2012", 17], ["@bbcnewsus", 17], ["@michaelskolnik", 17], ["@pants", 17], ["@afphq", 17], ["@arrghpaine", 17], ["@middleamericams", 17], ["@jenhatmaker", 17], ["@nowthisnews", 16], ["@aynrandpaulryan", 16], ["@gretawire", 16], ["@asheycake", 16], ["@remroum", 16], ["@seanspicer", 16], ["@glen", 16], ["@jrubinblogger", 16], ["@danabrams", 16], ["@digiphile", 15], ["@andreamsaul", 15], ["@blitznbeans", 15], ["@hardball", 15], ["@thefix", 15], ["@andrewhclark", 15], ["@ppact", 15]], [["#debates", 12476], ["#leadfromwithin", 882], ["#debate2012", 553], ["#bindersfullofwomen", 511], ["#debate", 470], ["#romney", 395], ["#tcot", 364], ["#obama", 354], ["#romneyryan2012", 242], ["#hofstradebate", 170], ["#p2", 166], ["#binderfullofwomen", 136], ["#election2012", 131], ["#current2012", 125], ["#teamobama", 109], ["#cantafford4more", 94], ["#ajstream", 92], ["#gop", 85], ["#obama2012", 80], ["#bindersofwomen", 57], ["#hofdebate", 55], ["#stonersafterdark", 53], ["#weed", 53], ["#cnndebate", 45], ["#tlot", 43], ["#fastandfurious", 32], ["#election", 32], ["#mitt", 29], ["#binders", 27], ["#mockthevote", 27], ["#mittromney", 25], ["#teammelissa", 24], ["#women", 23], ["#potus", 22], ["#teaparty", 21], ["#lnyhbt", 21], ["#changethedebate", 21], ["#dnc", 21], ["#benghazi", 20], ["#obamawinning", 19], ["#politics", 19], ["#atfgunwalking", 18], ["#romneyryan", 18], ["#binder", 17], ["#climate", 17], ["#dems", 17], ["#realromney", 16], ["#libya", 16], ["#failingagenda", 16], ["#immigration", 15], ["#teambarack", 15], ["#cnn", 15], ["#candy", 14], ["#cspan2012", 14], ["#presidential", 13], ["#fb", 13], ["#ryan", 13], ["#strong", 13], ["#news", 13], ["#mitt2012", 13], ["#romney2012", 12], ["#malarkey", 12], ["#takeyourtopoffalready", 12], ["#occupy", 12], ["#barackobama", 12], ["#lgbt", 12], ["#bindergate", 12], ["#youtubepolitics", 11], ["#binderofwomen", 11], ["#rs", 11], ["#wiright", 11], ["#tagteam", 11], ["#fail", 11], ["#iran", 11], ["#presidentialdebate", 10], ["#greenparty", 10], ["#ccot", 10], ["#president", 10], ["#hofstradebates", 10], ["#factcheck", 10], ["#mittens", 10], ["#democrats", 10], ["#china", 9], ["#jillstein", 9], ["#whitehouse", 9], ["#israel", 9], ["#energy", 9], ["#pagop", 9], ["#cpd", 9], ["#tpp", 9], ["#ohgop", 9], ["#msnbc", 9], ["#sgp", 8], ["#ff", 8], ["#bigbird", 8], ["#debates2012", 8], ["#sarcasm", 8], ["#romneyshambles", 8], ["#romneylies", 8], ["#msnbc2012", 8]], [["Romney", 5844], ["Obama", 3066]]] |
{"Angle":178.68353271484375,"MACAddresses":["00:1c:f0:cb:ec:92","00:1c:f0:cb:ec:5b","00:1c:f0:cb:e9:21","00:1c:f0:cb:ec:89"],"TimeMs":1308545833881,"00:1c:f0:cb:ec:89":{"APSSID":"ravinder","APCapabilities":"[WPA-EAP-TKIP+CCMP][WPA2-EAP-TKIP+CCMP-preauth]","APFrequency":"2437","APRSSI":"-92"},"MapId":1,"00:1c:f0:cb:e9:21":{"APSSID":"ravinder","APCapabilities":"[WPA-EAP-TKIP+CCMP][WPA2-EAP-TKIP+CCMP-preauth]","APFrequency":"2437","APRSSI":"-92"},"SampleName":"survey2","00:1c:f0:cb:ec:5b":{"APSSID":"ravinder","APCapabilities":"[WPA-EAP-TKIP+CCMP][WPA2-EAP-TKIP+CCMP-preauth]","APFrequency":"2437","APRSSI":"-76"},"HumanTime":"Mon Jun 20 10:27:13 GMT+05:30 2011 10:27:13","Y":0.17867708206176758,"X":0.3254687488079071,"00:1c:f0:cb:ec:92":{"APSSID":"ravinder","APCapabilities":"[WPA-EAP-TKIP+CCMP][WPA2-EAP-TKIP+CCMP-preauth]","APFrequency":"2412","APRSSI":"-64"}} |
{"name":"curve_downLeft","subject":1007,"date":"1412010-012637","paths":{"Pen":{"strokes":[{"x":368,"y":-725,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":0,"stroke_id":0},{"x":368,"y":-725,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":1,"stroke_id":0},{"x":368,"y":-725,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":2,"stroke_id":0},{"x":366,"y":-713,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":3,"stroke_id":0},{"x":366,"y":-713,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":4,"stroke_id":0},{"x":366,"y":-713,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":5,"stroke_id":0},{"x":366,"y":-713,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":6,"stroke_id":0},{"x":366,"y":-713,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":7,"stroke_id":0},{"x":366,"y":-713,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":8,"stroke_id":0},{"x":372,"y":-724,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":9,"stroke_id":0},{"x":372,"y":-724,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":10,"stroke_id":0},{"x":374,"y":-741,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":11,"stroke_id":0},{"x":372,"y":-755,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":12,"stroke_id":0},{"x":368,"y":-770,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":13,"stroke_id":0},{"x":360,"y":-790,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":14,"stroke_id":0},{"x":347,"y":-806,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":15,"stroke_id":0},{"x":327,"y":-825,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":16,"stroke_id":0},{"x":300,"y":-839,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":17,"stroke_id":0},{"x":263,"y":-848,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":18,"stroke_id":0},{"x":217,"y":-850,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":19,"stroke_id":0},{"x":162,"y":-845,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":20,"stroke_id":0},{"x":97,"y":-831,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":21,"stroke_id":0},{"x":27,"y":-807,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":22,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-48,"y":-773,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":23,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-120,"y":-731,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":24,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-194,"y":-682,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":25,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-264,"y":-627,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":26,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-325,"y":-567,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":27,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-378,"y":-505,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":28,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-419,"y":-437,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":29,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-451,"y":-366,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":30,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-468,"y":-299,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":31,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-472,"y":-232,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":32,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-467,"y":-170,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":33,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-444,"y":-110,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":34,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-411,"y":-53,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":35,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-363,"y":-2,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":36,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-306,"y":39,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":37,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-236,"y":72,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":38,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-162,"y":99,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":39,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-85,"y":119,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":40,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-8,"y":134,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":41,"stroke_id":0},{"x":68,"y":143,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":42,"stroke_id":0},{"x":139,"y":147,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":43,"stroke_id":0},{"x":198,"y":147,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":44,"stroke_id":0},{"x":249,"y":146,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":45,"stroke_id":0},{"x":286,"y":144,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":46,"stroke_id":0},{"x":315,"y":142,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":47,"stroke_id":0},{"x":334,"y":141,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":48,"stroke_id":0},{"x":348,"y":141,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":49,"stroke_id":0},{"x":348,"y":141,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":50,"stroke_id":0},{"x":348,"y":141,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":51,"stroke_id":0},{"x":348,"y":141,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":52,"stroke_id":0},{"x":348,"y":141,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":53,"stroke_id":0},{"x":348,"y":141,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":54,"stroke_id":0},{"x":360,"y":133,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":55,"stroke_id":0},{"x":360,"y":133,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":56,"stroke_id":0},{"x":349,"y":124,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":57,"stroke_id":0},{"x":338,"y":112,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":58,"stroke_id":0},{"x":317,"y":93,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":59,"stroke_id":0},{"x":291,"y":66,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":60,"stroke_id":0}]}},"device":{"osBrowserInfo":"Fujitsu-Siemens Lenovo X61 Tablet PC","resolutionHeight":null,"resolutionWidth":null,"windowHeight":null,"windowWidth":null,"pixelRatio":null,"mouse":false,"pen":true,"finger":false,"acceleration":false,"webcam":false}} |
{"title":"Jan Johansen - We Are The Champions (Live Så Ska Det Låta 2009","uid":5575722,"size":18593328,"categoryP":"video","categoryS":"music_videos","magnet":"?xt=urn:btih:2e8012277b1c1c2d0b3f675b13675ea4d477a97c&dn=Jan+Johansen+-+We+Are+The+Champions+%28Live+S%C3%83%C2%A5+Ska+Det+L%C3%83%C2%A5ta+2009&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969","seeders":0,"leechers":1,"uploader":"RosaMannen","files":1,"time":1274379317,"description":"Från SVTs Så Ska Det Låta.\n\n\n\n.ooOO ROSA MANNEN 2010 OOoo.\n <a href=" http://thepiratebay.se/user/RosaMannen" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW"> http://thepiratebay.se/user/RosaMannen</a>\t","torrent":{"xt":"urn:btih:2e8012277b1c1c2d0b3f675b13675ea4d477a97c","amp;dn":"Jan+Johansen+-+We+Are+The+Champions+%28Live+S%C3%83%C2%A5+Ska+Det+L%C3%83%C2%A5ta+2009","amp;tr":["udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80","udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337","udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969","udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969"],"infoHash":"2e8012277b1c1c2d0b3f675b13675ea4d477a97c","infoHashBuffer":{"type":"Buffer","data":[46,128,18,39,123,28,28,45,11,63,103,91,19,103,94,164,212,119,169,124]},"announce":[],"urlList":[]}} |
[
"http://www.happycow.net/reviews/la-vie-claire-le-thillot-67222"
] |
{
"first_traded_price": 14808.0,
"highest_price": 14808.0,
"isin": "IRT1FKNF0001",
"last_traded_price": 14799.0,
"lowest_price": 14799.0,
"trade_volume": 164270.0,
"unix_time": 1539475200
} |
{
"first_traded_price": 703444.0,
"highest_price": 7.2e5,
"isin": "IRO3MSZ95121",
"last_traded_price": 7.2e5,
"lowest_price": 6.81e5,
"trade_volume": 1303.0,
"unix_time": 1518912000
} |
{"textgrid.poem.51545": {"metadata": {"author": {"name": "Czepko von Reigersfeld, Daniel", "birth": "N.A.", "death": "N.A."}, "title": "58.", "genre": "verse", "period": "N.A.", "pub_year": 1632, "urn": "N.A.", "language": ["de:0.99"], "booktitle": "N.A."}, "text": null, "poem": {"stanza.1": {"line.1": {"text": "Was uns erhebt und st\u00fcrtzt, ist Willen und Verstand,", "tokens": ["Was", "uns", "er\u00b7hebt", "und", "st\u00fcrtzt", ",", "ist", "Wil\u00b7len", "und", "Ver\u00b7stand", ","], "token_info": ["word", "word", "word", "word", "word", "punct", "word", "word", "word", "word", "punct"], "pos": ["PWS", "PPER", "VVFIN", "KON", "VVFIN", "$,", "VAFIN", "NN", "KON", "NN", "$,"], "meter": "-+-+-+-+-+-+", "measure": "alexandrine.iambic.hexa"}, "line.2": {"text": "Wer \u00fcber beyde steigt, der wird mit Gott bekannt.", "tokens": ["Wer", "\u00fc\u00b7ber", "bey\u00b7de", "steigt", ",", "der", "wird", "mit", "Gott", "be\u00b7kannt", "."], "token_info": ["word", "word", "word", "word", "punct", "word", "word", "word", "word", "word", "punct"], "pos": ["PWS", "APPR", "PIS", "VVFIN", "$,", "PRELS", "VAFIN", "APPR", "NN", "PTKVZ", "$."], "meter": "-+-+-+-+-+-+", "measure": "alexandrine.iambic.hexa"}}, "stanza.2": {"line.1": {"text": "Was uns erhebt und st\u00fcrtzt, ist Willen und Verstand,", "tokens": ["Was", "uns", "er\u00b7hebt", "und", "st\u00fcrtzt", ",", "ist", "Wil\u00b7len", "und", "Ver\u00b7stand", ","], "token_info": ["word", "word", "word", "word", "word", "punct", "word", "word", "word", "word", "punct"], "pos": ["PWS", "PPER", "VVFIN", "KON", "VVFIN", "$,", "VAFIN", "NN", "KON", "NN", "$,"], "meter": "-+-+-+-+-+-+", "measure": "alexandrine.iambic.hexa"}, "line.2": {"text": "Wer \u00fcber beyde steigt, der wird mit Gott bekannt.", "tokens": ["Wer", "\u00fc\u00b7ber", "bey\u00b7de", "steigt", ",", "der", "wird", "mit", "Gott", "be\u00b7kannt", "."], "token_info": ["word", "word", "word", "word", "punct", "word", "word", "word", "word", "word", "punct"], "pos": ["PWS", "APPR", "PIS", "VVFIN", "$,", "PRELS", "VAFIN", "APPR", "NN", "PTKVZ", "$."], "meter": "-+-+-+-+-+-+", "measure": "alexandrine.iambic.hexa"}}}}} |
{"parse":{"title":"Template:\u4fe1\u606f\u680f","pageid":230353,"wikitext":{"*":"{|border=1 style=\"float: right; width: {{{width|250px}}}; font-size: 90%; margin: 0 0 1em 1em; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #999999 solid; border-collapse: collapse; clear: right;\" cellpadding=\"2\" cellspacing=\"0\"\n| colspan=\"2\" align=\"center\" |{{#if: {{{tabs|}}}| {{{tabs|}}} | {{#if:{{{image|}}}|[[Image:{{{image}}}|{{{imgwidth|250px}}}]]|{{{imglost|\u554a\u561e<br />\u8fd9\u91cc\u8fd8\u5c11\u4e00\u5f20\u56fe\u7247\uff1f}}}}}{{#if:{{{\u56fe\u7247\u8bf4\u660e|{{{\u56fe\u7247\u4fe1\u606f|}}}}}}|<br /><small>{{{\u56fe\u7247\u8bf4\u660e|{{{\u56fe\u7247\u4fe1\u606f|}}}}}}</small>}}}}\n{{ #if: {{{hideT1|}}} ||{{!-}}\n{{!}} colspan=2 align=\"center\" bgcolor=\"{{{tbgcolor|#E0FFFF}}}\" {{!}}{{{title|'''\u57fa\u672c\u8d44\u6599'''}}}}}\n|-\n{{#forargs:\n| key\n| val\n|<nowiki/>\n{{#switch: {{#var:key}}\n |tabs\n |image|imgwidth|imglost|\u56fe\u7247\u8bf4\u660e|\u56fe\u7247\u4fe1\u606f\n |tbgcolor\n |title\n |width\n |lwidth|lalign|ralign\n |hideT1 = <!-- \u5c4f\u853d\u5df2\u5b58\u5728\u7684\u9879\u76ee -->\n |#default =\n {{#if: {{#var:val}} |\n {{#switch: {{#invoke:String|sub|{{#var:key}}|j=1}}\n |T=\n {{!}} colspan=2 align=\"center\" bgcolor=\"{{{tbgcolor|#E0FFFF}}}\" {{!}}{{#var: val}}\n |#default=\n {{!}} style=\"text-align:{{{lalign|center}}}\" width={{{lwidth|80px}}} {{!}}'''{{#var: key}}''' {{!!}} style=\"text-align:{{{ralign|center}}}\" {{!}} {{#var: val}}\n }}<!-- end switch -->\n {{!}}-\n }}<!-- end if -->\n}}<!-- end switch -->\n}}<!-- end forargs -->\n|}\n<noinclude>\n\u53ef\u4ee5\u81ea\u5b9a\u4e49\u6240\u6709\u9879\u7684\u683c\u5f0f\u6bd4\u8f83\u7b80\u5355\u7684\u4fe1\u606f\u680f\u6a21\u677f\u3002\n\n\u672c\u6a21\u677f\u53ef\u4ee5\uff1a\n* \u652f\u6301\u81ea\u5b9a\u4e49\u6240\u6709\u9879\u76ee\u3002\n* \u652f\u6301\u6a2a\u680f\u5206\u9694\u3002\n* \u9002\u7528\u4e8e\u8bbe\u5b9a\u3001\u7528\u8bed\u3001\u6210\u53e5\u548c\u840c\u5c5e\u6027\u7b49\u6761\u76ee\u7684\u53f3\u4fa7\u4fe1\u606f\u680f\u3002\n* \u5411\u4e0b\u517c\u5bb9\u5927\u90e8\u5206\u7684\u4fe1\u606f\u680f\uff08\u4fe1\u606f\u680f2.0\u98ce\u683c\u9664\u5916\uff09\uff0c\u53ea\u9700\u8981\u5c06\u6a21\u677f\u540d\u6539\u4e3a\u4fe1\u606f\u680f\u5c31\u80fd\u76f4\u63a5\u83b7\u5f97\u672c\u6a21\u677f\u7684\u6240\u6709\u7279\u6027\u3002\n\n\u529f\u80fd\u66f4\u5f3a\u5927\u7684\u6a21\u677f\u53c2\u89c1{{tl|\u4fe1\u606f\u680f2.0}}\n== \u53c2\u6570\u8bf4\u660e ==\n<pre>\n{{\u4fe1\u606f\u680f\n|image = <!-- \u914d\u56fe -->\n|imgwidth = <!-- \u56fe\u7247\u5bbd\u5ea6\uff0c\u9ed8\u8ba4\u4e3a250px -->\n|\u56fe\u7247\u4fe1\u606f = <!-- \u663e\u793a\u5728\u914d\u56fe\u4e0b\u9762\u7684\u56fe\u7247\u4fe1\u606f -->\n|tabs = <!-- \u4f7f\u7528tabs\u7684\u8bdd\uff0c\u4f1a\u8986\u76d6\u56fe\u7247\u548c\u56fe\u7247\u4fe1\u606f\u7684\u8bbe\u7f6e -->\n|width = <!-- \u603b\u5bbd\u5ea6\uff0c\u9ed8\u8ba4250px -->\n|tbgcolor = <!-- \u6a2a\u680f\u80cc\u666f\u8272\uff0c\u9ed8\u8ba4\u4e3a#E0FFFF -->\n|title = <!-- \u7b2c\u4e00\u6a2a\u680f\u7684\u663e\u793a\u6587\u672c\uff0c\u9ed8\u8ba4\u4e3a\u201c\u57fa\u672c\u8d44\u6599\u201d -->\n|hideT1 = <!-- \u8bbe\u7f6e\u540e\u9690\u85cf\u7b2c\u4e00\u6a2a\u680f -->\n|lwidth = <!-- \u5de6\u680f\u5bbd\u5ea6\uff0c\u9ed8\u8ba480px -->\n|lalign = <!-- \u5de6\u680f\u5bf9\u5176\u65b9\u5f0f\uff0c\u9ed8\u8ba4\u5c45\u4e2dcenter -->\n|ralign = <!-- \u53f3\u680f\u5bf9\u5176\u65b9\u5f0f\uff0c\u9ed8\u8ba4\u5c45\u4e2dcenter -->\n|\u9879\u76ee1 =\n|\u9879\u76ee2 =\n|\u9879\u76ee3 =\n\u2026\u2026\n|Txx = <!-- \u4ee5T\u5f00\u5934\u7684\u9879\u76ee\u53ef\u8bbe\u7f6e\u4e00\u4e2a\u6a2a\u680f-->\n|\u9879\u76ee5 =\n|\u9879\u76ee6 =\n\u2026\u2026\n}}\n</pre>\n== \u4f7f\u7528\u793a\u4f8b ==\n{{\u4fe1\u606f\u680f\n|image = Hst.jpg\n|title = <small>'''\u57fa\u672c\u4fe1\u606f'''</small>\n|\u59d3\u540d = \u9ec4\u5c11\u5929\n|\u6027\u522b = \u7537\n|\u89d2\u8272\u5361 = \u591c\u96e8\u58f0\u70e6\n|\u804c\u4e1a = \u5251\u5ba2\n|\u6240\u5c5e\u6218\u961f = \u84dd\u96e8\n|T\u7b2c\u4e8c\u680f = <small>'''\u8be6\u7ec6\u4fe1\u606f'''</small>\n|\u5c01\u53f7 = \u5251\u5723\n|\u6635\u79f0 = \u5c0f\u5929\u5929\n|\u8eab\u9ad8 = 176cm\n|\u751f\u65e5 = 8\u670810\u65e5\n|\u840c\u70b9 = \u8bdd\u75e8\n|T\u7b2c\u4e09\u680f = <small>'''[[\u5168\u804c\u9ad8\u624b]]'''</small>\n}}\n<pre>\n{{\u4fe1\u606f\u680f\n|image = 23207028 p0.jpg\n|title = <small>'''\u57fa\u672c\u4fe1\u606f'''</small>\n|\u59d3\u540d = \u9ec4\u5c11\u5929\n|\u6027\u522b = \u7537\n|\u89d2\u8272\u5361 = \u591c\u96e8\u58f0\u70e6\n|\u804c\u4e1a = \u5251\u5ba2\n|\u6240\u5c5e\u6218\u961f = \u84dd\u96e8\n|T\u7b2c\u4e8c\u680f = <small>'''\u8be6\u7ec6\u4fe1\u606f'''</small>\n|\u5c01\u53f7 = \u5251\u5723\n|\u6635\u79f0 = \u5c0f\u5929\u5929\n|\u8eab\u9ad8 = 176cm\n|\u751f\u65e5 = 8\u670810\u65e5\n|\u840c\u70b9 = \u8bdd\u75e8\n|T\u7b2c\u4e09\u680f = <small>'''[[\u5168\u804c\u9ad8\u624b]]'''</small>\n}}\n</pre>\n\n== \u5176\u4ed6 ==\n[[\u5206\u7c7b:\u4fe1\u606f\u6a21\u677f]]\n</noinclude>"}}} |
{"artist": "Luther Allison", "timestamp": "2011-08-01 03:09:10.560020", "similars": [["TRDCJPZ128F421B27E", 1], ["TRLDDJY128F421B291", 0.80193599999999998], ["TRQPWBI128F4290679", 0.151029], ["TRYSENK128F42906E8", 0.151029], ["TRHKYQK128F932A174", 0.130385], ["TRRWFGD128F930CD1C", 0.122947], ["TRCIAGM128F1468138", 0.118215], ["TRAPMFR128F9316841", 0.118215], ["TRKDXDM128F42515E4", 0.118215], ["TRHUVXR128F4240472", 0.117713], ["TRMHUHR128F92FB70C", 0.113425], ["TRBAZYH128F4288198", 0.113425], ["TRQXBWR128F4295D7C", 0.113425], ["TRUZQZN128F92E2708", 0.113425], ["TRYLNBB12903CE5780", 0.11212800000000001], ["TRKDGNB128F93613A4", 0.109475], ["TRETFWX128F421A7E4", 0.10918600000000001], ["TRSXSBK128F92CBF10", 0.10787099999999999], ["TRAMFAF128F421A973", 0.107275], ["TRLPXOS128F92D1A0E", 0.106807], ["TRGTFOW128F93613A7", 0.10559499999999999], ["TRCUJPB128F4234470", 0.10476199999999999], ["TRVPYYY128F92F2D64", 0.102622], ["TRBMAOD128F4234159", 0.101494], ["TROYHOX128F421A861", 0.101217], ["TRYBFAK128F421A85E", 0.100633], ["TRSWGSV12903CB5E2C", 0.100451], ["TRJZZUF128F9332693", 0.100008], ["TRYREAT128F421AE5F", 0.098224699999999998], ["TRMJBYI12903CC5108", 0.096795099999999995], ["TRCWCLM128F92FB6E2", 0.096795099999999995], ["TRZQPVP128F92FB5FA", 0.096795099999999995], ["TREHWFM128F92F7645", 0.096557000000000004], ["TRDFZEP128F421A78F", 0.096557000000000004], ["TRPWVOD128F426372F", 0.096285700000000002], ["TRCAFYW128F421A985", 0.095870399999999995], ["TRNHLBZ128F42626A3", 0.095439499999999997], ["TRWMGAC128F4263AAC", 0.095313300000000004], ["TRGJTQE128F9305F3F", 0.095313300000000004], ["TRIZWQJ128F429FE21", 0.094640000000000002], ["TRVUTUU12903CD46E5", 0.093771800000000002], ["TRYDKRC128F421AD5C", 0.093540499999999999], ["TRWQRNQ128E0792F7A", 0.093506000000000006], ["TRNWUBG12903D0DBE2", 0.093506000000000006], ["TRBQTUS128F425A2F7", 0.093504799999999999], ["TRIFLIJ12903CD3DB6", 0.092285599999999995], ["TRVCYRQ128EF347501", 0.092285599999999995], ["TRMERIM128F93497BC", 0.091397099999999995], ["TRRFBND128F42B74A4", 0.091397099999999995], ["TRFJUKP128F9334C43", 0.091397099999999995], ["TRTBXAG128F1484C94", 0.091397099999999995], ["TROXQFE128F149854B", 0.091397099999999995], ["TRXJMKN128E078A31A", 0.091397099999999995], ["TRYAMBW128F932728A", 0.091265399999999997], ["TRCENRJ128F92F6236", 0.087770799999999996], ["TRFNPBT12903D082F5", 0.087637300000000001], ["TRAPGOZ128F933A945", 0.087637300000000001], ["TRWXCLJ128F9305F45", 0.087443099999999996], ["TRATDTH128F4263AAD", 0.087443099999999996], ["TRBRLFR12903CE6A41", 0.0869669], ["TRHTZMH128F92D9130", 0.085990700000000003], ["TRXQJQP128F4250F28", 0.084126999999999993], ["TRLTDOJ128F9302A2D", 0.083952899999999997], ["TRMCCWI128F9332172", 0.082500799999999999], ["TRYCWAP128F146742A", 0.081861000000000003], ["TRCACFQ128F424B243", 0.081616099999999997], ["TROURCA12903CE6B0B", 0.081408900000000006], ["TRVUMMR128F1469780", 0.080890100000000006], ["TRIXEAW128F93566B6", 0.080881900000000007], ["TRROCGA128E0793688", 0.080643999999999993], ["TRYPDDB128F93612A8", 0.080052600000000002], ["TRMIUYV128E079366D", 0.078979900000000006], ["TRYTZLX128F42346CA", 0.078501899999999999], ["TRCQPDT128F92FA6BC", 0.078100199999999995], ["TRMLBMX128F9325B17", 0.078070100000000003], ["TRHFJCW12903CB571B", 0.078070100000000003], ["TRLBSWL128E078FA92", 0.077963599999999994], ["TRJEBVT128F92F207B", 0.077716499999999994], ["TRESWPN128F936126E", 0.075714000000000004], ["TRCFXXN128F933710F", 0.075321600000000002], ["TRRVHXW128F421A830", 0.074945399999999995], ["TRBRRNI128F147B251", 0.074400900000000006], ["TRBLDFD128F148833A", 0.074400900000000006], ["TRXIZMQ12903CAAD30", 0.073817499999999994], ["TRBNVPY128F93148CF", 0.073777200000000001], ["TRCGXYF128F4233C2B", 0.073733900000000005], ["TRKLSXY128F42AC68B", 0.073668399999999995], ["TRUNGLI128F425AD28", 0.073499700000000001], ["TRIWQPP128F1469783", 0.072724300000000006], ["TRNZUJT128F427076E", 0.0725383], ["TRQQWCU128F426C2B6", 0.071712700000000004], ["TRMZBEI128F1467429", 0.069333800000000001], ["TRBJHIW128F932C816", 0.069333800000000001], ["TRYPPQJ128F932AA46", 0.069333800000000001], ["TRNPEUW128F4262E21", 0.067111799999999999], ["TRINNQX128F425AD26", 0.066251699999999997], ["TRUBQPW128F4236D9A", 0.064554299999999995], ["TRANZOR128F9307EFD", 0.064105999999999996], ["TREDKUV128F421EEA1", 0.063920599999999994], ["TRGCHDW128F92D0669", 0.0635656], ["TRFYYPB128E0791CE8", 0.0635656], ["TRNRKIR128F42B7443", 0.0635656], ["TRUURCE128F425787C", 0.061814300000000003], ["TRDBEPD128F93080B0", 0.060599], ["TRCDRBW128F93461B4", 0.059314899999999997], ["TRFLWAS12903CAA70C", 0.059314899999999997], ["TREPLLT128F934BFEC", 0.059314899999999997], ["TROGYEI128F4244588", 0.059314899999999997], ["TRHQETO128F4277F9D", 0.058602700000000001], ["TRVROLZ128F92D0610", 0.058602700000000001], ["TRQJTGX128F42B06CE", 0.0584241], ["TRNVLSC128F932FB06", 0.058185899999999999], ["TRPTGDO128F92EF895", 0.058185899999999999], ["TRXRBWX128F932AC86", 0.058185899999999999], ["TRROPWM128F42AC689", 0.058022200000000003], ["TRGRCOX128F425789D", 0.057413499999999999], ["TRXFCSG128F4257874", 0.057413499999999999], ["TRDMJLH128F149DAF6", 0.057059400000000003], ["TRTIZRP128F92FD0CC", 0.0563863], ["TRVTAYV12903CE43D9", 0.056148700000000003], ["TRWHYCN128F423323E", 0.055883200000000001], ["TREUIXS128F4271AB7", 0.055883200000000001], ["TRANSAG128F147389D", 0.055376000000000002], ["TRWUZFE128F423323A", 0.055165400000000003], ["TRYILRB128F92D0642", 0.054929800000000001], ["TRGXZKB128F930FD74", 0.0541103], ["TRZECJD128F422483F", 0.0541103], ["TRVYLXP128F9305135", 0.053657999999999997], ["TRHJAUP128F145E735", 0.051669399999999997], ["TRXMYDJ128F421B364", 0.050849600000000002], ["TRMYPKE128F92EFA6D", 0.050616700000000001], ["TRQDOUA128F9343E5F", 0.050053300000000002], ["TRQYLQY12903CE5E28", 0.049628100000000001], ["TRNJHNE12903CEC1E3", 0.049104700000000001], ["TRQJZHB128F92FA42D", 0.048806200000000001], ["TRULDJD12903CF58BD", 0.048806200000000001], ["TRJLRVQ128F92FB80E", 0.048806200000000001], ["TRSRWKG128F92E15CC", 0.048806200000000001], ["TRVZFQM128F92D064F", 0.048806200000000001], ["TRQPWJW128F934BFF0", 0.047821000000000002], ["TRZTVAP128F9339380", 0.047821000000000002], ["TROBFJQ12903CAA709", 0.047821000000000002], ["TRKWSYG12903CB54E6", 0.047821000000000002], ["TRBMTMD128F42336E2", 0.047709399999999999], ["TRTMNPF128F42437CA", 0.047582600000000003], ["TRWEVIE128F92CC822", 0.0471064], ["TRMKAFD128F4233D4C", 0.045863300000000003], ["TRFHXBP128F4233D73", 0.045863300000000003], ["TRNNHHJ128F93172D9", 0.045863300000000003], ["TRAUFHA128F9300B82", 0.045047299999999998], ["TRNNPWU128F92FDF8C", 0.045047299999999998], ["TRMWQYD128F426639B", 0.0448362], ["TRIRYYZ128E0791CDC", 0.044605199999999998], ["TRPFHNL128F933F222", 0.044605199999999998], ["TRBQULK128F424B074", 0.044517000000000001], ["TRBPYVH128F424B07D", 0.044517000000000001], ["TRQHEPI128F146CC26", 0.044517000000000001], ["TRUESIZ128F92D0641", 0.044517000000000001], ["TREKHPV12903CBB897", 0.044517000000000001], ["TRPLZCT128F932DA39", 0.044382199999999997], ["TRBIKVT128F426F644", 0.043171000000000001], ["TRUVIVX128F4291EDB", 0.041994499999999997], ["TRNUOPJ12903CBDC35", 0.041154099999999999], ["TRLSJSL128F92FA6C3", 0.041154099999999999], ["TROHRRJ128F93080E7", 0.041154099999999999], ["TRIUCGT128F422F67A", 0.0389749], ["TRSEAAS128F421A9AF", 0.037966899999999998], ["TRWXSWC128F42354B9", 0.037810000000000003], ["TRGVLNM128F92C3B22", 0.035377899999999997], ["TRRKUMV128F9300330", 0.032456600000000002], ["TRPVPZV128F4224346", 0.032456600000000002], ["TRIVWBX128F931354A", 0.031319300000000001]], "tags": [["blues", "100"], ["blues rock", "68"], ["electric blues", "34"], ["guitar", "25"], ["rock", "6"], ["serious", "6"], ["Classic Blues", "6"], ["Luther Allison", "6"], ["plus", "3"], ["Karlsruhe", "3"], ["soul blues", "3"], ["My pop music", "3"], ["desiderio", "3"], ["Tilos Blues", "3"], ["men in blues", "3"], ["all- time favourite", "3"], ["feelintheblues type", "3"], ["double-ender 4", "3"], ["Gitarrenunterricht", "3"], ["allboutguitar", "3"], ["covern", "3"], ["Radiotsar approved", "3"], ["awsome guitar solos", "3"], ["Contemporary Blues", "3"], ["modern electric blues", "3"], ["classik rock", "3"], ["Modern Blues", "3"], ["Chicago Blues", "3"], ["love songs", "3"], ["favoriten", "3"], ["Recommended", "3"], ["Favorite", "3"], ["chill", "3"], ["rhythm and blues", "3"], ["alternative rock", "3"], ["classic rock", "3"], ["seen live", "0"], ["Blues Tag", "0"]], "track_id": "TRCJLCC12903CBF4AE", "title": "Serious"} |
{
"subtitle": "Tell your healthcare provider",
"description": "Tell your healthcare provider",
"language": "eng_GB",
"title": "Who shall I tell?",
"primary_category": "5e354c9c57df4314b7e1214a733bbcdf",
"created_at": "2015-04-23T09:48:18+00:00",
"featured_in_category": false,
"modified_at": "2015-06-22T12:14:42.028064+00:00",
"_version": {
"package_version": "1.0.1",
"language_version": "2.7.6",
"language": "python",
"language_version_string": "2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 23:03:41) \n[GCC 4.8.2]",
"package": "elastic-git"
},
"linked_pages": [
"c33b483d4b1440a2963d358214ab19bd",
"8411a8b1f11c4436956ca3421552fc69",
"4ec2d75b8e2a487893468c06e8a18df3",
"b46e373d829c4bd7a9981ef3f9b88e13",
"0b5e815f44e04e78b0b7766f21708ea1",
"9b893bf6191e4c27a138da812673a130"
],
"id": null,
"content": "Created by BabyCenter\r\n\r\nSome women want to keep their pregnancy a secret at first. \r\n\r\nBut telling your healthcare provider does not mean you have to tell everyone else. \r\n\r\nTalking about being pregnant with a healthcare provider will be good for you and your baby. It will mean fewer problems if you get the right care early on.\r\n\r\nYou can have tests to make sure that you and your baby are healthy. You can have blood and urine (water) tests, and tests for HIV.\r\n\r\nYou can also get medicine to stop you getting malaria while you are pregnant.\r\n\r\nIf you know you are living with HIV, you may be able to have free medication to prevent your baby from becoming HIV+. \r\n\r\nEven if you feel well, get regular check-ups so that you and your baby can stay healthy.\r\n",
"source": null,
"featured": false,
"author_tags": [],
"image": null,
"published": null,
"position": 97,
"image_host": "http://thumbor.unicore.io",
"slug": "who-shall-i-tell",
"uuid": "324aad220878494e858b0f8abf4ea280"
} |
{
"name": "salami-annotate-web",
"version": "0.0.0",
"private": true,
"scripts": {
"start": "node --inspect ./bin/www"
},
"dependencies": {
"cookie-parser": "~1.4.4",
"csv": "^5.3.2",
"debug": "~2.6.9",
"express": "~4.16.1",
"http-errors": "~1.6.3",
"jade": "~1.11.0",
"jquery": "^3.5.1",
"morgan": "~1.9.1",
"multer": "^1.4.2",
"multistream": "^4.1.0",
"system-commands": "^1.1.7",
"vue": "^2.6.12",
"vue-global-events": "^1.2.1",
"vue-hot-reload-api": "^2.3.4",
"vue-router": "^3.5.1",
"vuetable-3": "^3.3.3",
"wavesurfer.js": "github:katspaugh/wavesurfer.js#osheroff/playhead_plugin"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@vue/component-compiler-utils": "^3.2.0",
"vue-template-compiler": "^2.6.12"
}
}
|
{
"id": 115575,
"rating": 1734,
"attempts": 12280,
"fen": "r4rk1/pp3p2/2p1pbp1/3q3p/3P3P/P1B4R/1PP1QP2/1K4R1 b - - 1 22",
"color": "white",
"initialPly": 44,
"gameId": "Mc8TJOjG",
"lines": {
"h3f3": {
"f5b5": {
"e2b5": {
"c6b5": {
"f3f6": {
"f8d8": "win"
}
}
}
}
}
},
"vote": 249,
"enabled": true
} |
[{"description":"treehash per file","signed_content":{"payload":"eyJjb250ZW50X2hhc2hlcyI6W3siYmxvY2tfc2l6ZSI6NDA5NiwiZGlnZXN0Ijoic2hhMjU2IiwiZmlsZXMiOlt7InBhdGgiOiJjcmwtc2V0Iiwicm9vdF9oYXNoIjoidzh0Z2VBM25Dbjk4bG9USmxxUDBWZkdVRjZDeUtZUmhJaDdPZnpzX184RSJ9LHsicGF0aCI6Im1hbmlmZXN0Lmpzb24iLCJyb290X2hhc2giOiJpMUR4YThoVy03ZjBLRlBsaU8yM19xRFhKbEloNnhZdUVqeGFPMmwzdUNVIn1dLCJmb3JtYXQiOiJ0cmVlaGFzaCIsImhhc2hfYmxvY2tfc2l6ZSI6NDA5Nn1dLCJpdGVtX2lkIjoiaGZua3BpbWxoaGdpZWFkZGdmZW1qaG9mbWZibG1uaWIiLCJpdGVtX3ZlcnNpb24iOiI0MjYxIiwicHJvdG9jb2xfdmVyc2lvbiI6MX0","signatures":[{"header":{"kid":"publisher"},"protected":"eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9","signature":"hiIN_2Hiz9zA99i9jT_71F4WnNtf2Qc1qIYoRaerDaWoO7ZJywyTCUmrYfqU9UyWE5jB31xr9ds-axez75QBRGNaYtc314s216ks6k8lPRZyE6xdF_6S_kjUUV9lVcxfP9_p6IOqkLQhuAPwaIahXie9FkIeblyu0zXYqU8CYRTmGsjmKjLouktL0br3YQ7ZcfqvhH6B3PsnJVUEJZmwYJqPkuzlC4AnMaOmoUvfXQ_fzsgvlB3styES4WvDSbsenrd4sXLe_xD8LVXMLatdC2QWtUrTN_-Mv89U5rCOSkx0ktYsP0y5p3ZsDnjCTd7MFF8kKZXFtwgP2kGJRBDKtQ"},{"header":{"kid":"webstore"},"protected":"eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9","signature":"W0UD-Et9f2koZuBJUj2p8JiEF98iAKYCF9NJ7NUnyXcCHA5WVpJoh2eW3dqvNpm3gfzHUlapAQG6rp6-nVjBHUxe5aW6twtbri1K1VakgNsdPzODDLHvylolUHhUCGlrYXTEwwpxN6XzCjXg744oMk5rNQheU2r6e7XqadoiAoJEazDZmv_vFd35M590c_9pU9j5pnEsGb17QvZn0_lR59avVPviYbI0MrPtA5SWFlugPC1WhGZoZ2UOwPri5EtYspnz8Q5Q4VbT6QyDnb4Q_YBE19IYMi8ktBjllwvChtIwfzH19itO0pxijWrVv6QmvY0-xo-9wKWQ8MHdp2RCkQ"}]}}] |
{
"func": "gravity",
"material": {
"type": "young_poisson",
"young": 680000,
"poisson": 0.45,
"density": 3200
},
"energy_model": "neohookean_i",
"mesh": "model/bob_origface.1",
"g": [0, -9.81, 0],
"out_filename": "bob_origface",
"out_surface_vtx": "bob_origface.vtx",
"scale": 0.08,
"boundary_proj_dir": [-1, 0, 0],
"boundary_thresh": 0.04
}
|
{
"project_info": {
"project_number": "383264275213",
"firebase_url": "https://smartshopper-e4b3c.firebaseio.com",
"project_id": "smartshopper-e4b3c",
"storage_bucket": "smartshopper-e4b3c.appspot.com"
},
"client": [
{
"client_info": {
"mobilesdk_app_id": "1:383264275213:android:7daec0c4b407b9aa448e44",
"android_client_info": {
"package_name": "com.example.smartshopper"
}
},
"oauth_client": [
{
"client_id": "383264275213-g6rrpbebstjdv8gmrh7ratf3mo8fr50t.apps.googleusercontent.com",
"client_type": 1,
"android_info": {
"package_name": "com.example.smartshopper",
"certificate_hash": "fe2a98623ccee68d3fbd40882cbfd0e77f4f2ea3"
}
},
{
"client_id": "383264275213-1cs94ohsuehda42a7m4d2clkfcqdsvjv.apps.googleusercontent.com",
"client_type": 3
}
],
"api_key": [
{
"current_key": "AIzaSyBGyhKmFUhqukjdRY6pkcIb5coZ0gIiAhI"
}
],
"services": {
"appinvite_service": {
"other_platform_oauth_client": [
{
"client_id": "383264275213-1cs94ohsuehda42a7m4d2clkfcqdsvjv.apps.googleusercontent.com",
"client_type": 3
}
]
}
}
}
],
"configuration_version": "1"
} |
{
"actions": [
{
"acted_at": "1994-09-28",
"committee": "Committee on Foreign Relations",
"references": [],
"status": "REFERRED",
"text": "Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.",
"type": "referral"
},
{
"acted_at": "1994-09-29",
"in_committee": "Committee on Foreign Relations",
"references": [],
"status": "REPORTED",
"text": "Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.",
"type": "calendar"
},
{
"acted_at": "1994-09-29",
"references": [],
"text": "Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported to Senate by Senator Pell without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.",
"type": "action"
},
{
"acted_at": "1994-09-29",
"calendar": "Senate Legislative",
"number": "696",
"references": [],
"text": "Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 696.",
"type": "calendar",
"under": "General Orders"
},
{
"acted_at": "1994-10-05",
"how": "by Voice Vote",
"references": [
{
"reference": "CR S14234-14235",
"type": "consideration"
}
],
"result": "pass",
"status": "PASSED:SIMPLERES",
"text": "Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote.",
"type": "vote",
"vote_type": "vote",
"where": "s"
}
],
"amendments": [],
"bill_id": "sres270-103",
"bill_type": "sres",
"committees": [
{
"activity": [
"referral",
"markup",
"reporting"
],
"committee": "Senate Foreign Relations",
"committee_id": "SSFR"
}
],
"congress": "103",
"cosponsors": [
{
"district": null,
"name": "Brown, Hank",
"sponsored_at": "1994-09-28",
"state": "CO",
"thomas_id": "00135",
"title": "Sen",
"withdrawn_at": null
},
{
"district": null,
"name": "Coats, Daniel",
"sponsored_at": "1994-10-07",
"state": "IN",
"thomas_id": "00209",
"title": "Sen",
"withdrawn_at": null
},
{
"district": null,
"name": "Helms, Jesse",
"sponsored_at": "1994-09-28",
"state": "NC",
"thomas_id": "01359",
"title": "Sen",
"withdrawn_at": null
},
{
"district": null,
"name": "Mathews, Harlan",
"sponsored_at": "1994-09-29",
"state": "TN",
"thomas_id": "01390",
"title": "Sen",
"withdrawn_at": null
},
{
"district": null,
"name": "Pell, Claiborne",
"sponsored_at": "1994-09-28",
"state": "RI",
"thomas_id": "01417",
"title": "Sen",
"withdrawn_at": null
},
{
"district": null,
"name": "Robb, Charles S.",
"sponsored_at": "1994-09-28",
"state": "VA",
"thomas_id": "01423",
"title": "Sen",
"withdrawn_at": null
},
{
"district": null,
"name": "Simon, Paul",
"sponsored_at": "1994-09-28",
"state": "IL",
"thomas_id": "01059",
"title": "Sen",
"withdrawn_at": null
}
],
"enacted_as": null,
"history": {
"awaiting_signature": false,
"enacted": false,
"senate_passage_result": "pass",
"senate_passage_result_at": "1994-10-05",
"vetoed": false
},
"introduced_at": "1994-09-28",
"number": "270",
"official_title": "A resolution to express the sense of the Senate concerning U.S. relations with Taiwan.",
"popular_title": null,
"related_bills": [],
"short_title": null,
"sponsor": {
"district": null,
"name": "Murkowski, Frank H.",
"state": "AK",
"thomas_id": "01408",
"title": "Sen",
"type": "person"
},
"status": "PASSED:SIMPLERES",
"status_at": "1994-10-05",
"subjects": [
"Advice and consent of the Senate",
"Ambassadors",
"Annexation (International law)",
"Armed forces and national security",
"Arms sales",
"Cabinet officers",
"China",
"Congress",
"Congressional reporting requirements",
"Diplomacy",
"East Asia",
"Foreign trade and international finance",
"Government operations and politics",
"International affairs",
"International agencies",
"International economic relations",
"International monetary system",
"Multilateral development banks",
"Recognition (International law)",
"Taiwan",
"United Nations delegations",
"United Nations membership"
],
"subjects_top_term": "International affairs",
"summary": {
"as": "Introduced",
"date": "1994-09-28",
"text": "Expresses the sense of the Senate that U.S. policy toward Taiwan should: (1) welcome the President of the Republic of China on Taiwan and other high-level Government officials to the United States; (2) allow unrestricted office calls by all representatives of Taiwan in the United States to all U.S. departments and agencies; (3) send cabinet-level officials to Taiwan on a regular basis; (4) support a proposal in the United Nations for formal observer status for Taiwan, a proposal for its full admission into a wide range of international organizations, and participation of the President of the Republic of China on Taiwan in the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum; (5) change the name of Taiwan's representative office in the United States to the \"Taipei Representative Office\"; (6) approve defensive arms sales to Taiwan based solely on Taiwan's self-defense needs; (7) require advice and consent of the Senate for the highest level U.S. representative in Taiwan; (8) upgrade the status of the existing American Institute in Taiwan; (9) include a report by the Secretary of State to specified congressional committees on U.S. relations with Taiwan; and (10) raise U.S. concerns about the People's Republic of China's threat to forcefully reunify with Taiwan."
},
"titles": [
{
"as": "introduced",
"title": "A resolution to express the sense of the Senate concerning U.S. relations with Taiwan.",
"type": "official"
}
],
"updated_at": "2013-02-02T20:31:45-05:00"
} |
{
"name": "apollo-example",
"version": "0.1.0",
"private": true,
"scripts": {
"dev": "next dev",
"build": "next build",
"start": "next start"
},
"dependencies": {
"@apollo/react-hooks": "^3.1.2",
"apollo-cache-inmemory": "^1.6.3",
"apollo-client": "^2.6.4",
"apollo-link-http": "^1.5.16",
"apollo-server": "^2.9.12",
"apollo-server-micro": "^2.9.12",
"eslint": "^6.5.1",
"graphql": "^14.5.8",
"graphql-tag": "^2.10.1",
"immer": "^5.0.0",
"isomorphic-unfetch": "^3.0.0",
"next": "9.1.1",
"next-with-apollo": "^4.3.0",
"ramda": "^0.26.1",
"react": "16.10.2",
"react-beautiful-dnd": "^12.1.1",
"react-dom": "16.10.2",
"styled-components": "^4.4.1",
"use-immer": "^0.3.5"
}
}
|
{"RecordFormat":{"value":"AlephXML"},"RecordType":{"value":"Bibliographic"},"RecordLeader":{"recordType":"Main record","recordStatus":"Unchanged"},"xbib":[{"uid":"HT002093334"},{"uid":"005288351"},{"identifier":["DE-575","DE-1042","DE-Hag4","DE-Hag4-4","DE-38-409","DE-38","DE-Bo404","DE-38-459","DE-38-448","DE-38-434","DE-6-259","DE-6","DE-1156","DE-Tr2","DE-464","DE-466","DE-467","DE-Kn38-W","DE-Kn38","DE-6-298","DE-386","DE-82-711","DE-82","DE-61","DE-369","DE-364","DE-6-153","DE-6-211","DE-6-210","DE-5-76","DE-5","DE-Kn28","DE-6-186","DE-6-162","DE-5-162","DE-5-39","DE-1116","DE-5-225","DE-Walb1","DE-5-22","DE-98","DE-211","DE-6-309","DE-6-033","DE-6-290","DE-6-139a","DE-6-021","DE-Tr5","DE-5-21","DE-743","DE-836","DE-6-164","DE-38M","DE-294-28","DE-294","DE-294-21","DE-294-32","DE-290","DE-294-11","DE-294-14","DE-294-60","DE-5-95","DE-5-182","DE-5-142","DE-5-79","DE-5-181","DE-5-97","DE-5-187","DE-6-311","DE-6-N","DE-294-42","DE-294-56","DE-5-190","DE-5N","DE-294-67","DE-294-37","DE-5-184","DE-5-26","DE-1044","DE-5-141","DE-294-23","DE-294-36","DE-294-47","DE-Due18","DE-Bed1","DE-294-51","DE-294-33","DE-5-11","DE-294-25","DE-5-51","DE-6-249","DE-Bi10","DE-294-22","DE-5-20","DE-6-023","DE-38-461","DE-38-432","DE-1393-BOT","DE-1393","DE-465","DE-Kn3","DE-82-601","DE-6-192","DE-Dm13","DE-Due62","DE-121","DE-1018","DE-38-410","DE-Bm40","DE-Kn41","DE-1010","DE-294-18","DE-361","DE-362","DE-385","DE-468","DE-51","DE-6-A","DE-6-332","DE-6-M","DE-6-006","DE-6-007","DE-6-011","DE-6-015","DE-6-016","DE-6-020","DE-6-049","DE-6-050","DE-6-058","DE-6-069","DE-6-115","DE-6-123","DE-6-125","DE-6-152","DE-6-165","DE-6-177","DE-6-178","DE-6-187","DE-6-228","DE-6-230","DE-6-244","DE-6-248","DE-708","DE-929","DE-Kob7","DE-Lan1","DE-82-715","DE-82-745","DE-82-707","DE-82-748","DE-82-765","DE-82-744","DE-Zw1","DE-6-246","DE-62","DE-Kn133","DE-131","DE-6-183","DE-6-250","DE-294-39","DE-107","DE-6-096","DE-5-7","DE-6-052","DE-5-99","DE-5-8","DE-5-13","DE-6-258","DE-6-318","DE-260","DE-294-27","DE-6-097","DE-5-4","DE-82-749","DE-6-190","DE-829","DE-294-24","DE-A96","DE-832","DE-6-136","DE-6-156","DE-6-151","DE-6-154","DE-6-193","DE-6-053","DE-6-191","DE-6-166","DE-6-119","DE-6-017","DE-6-255","DE-294-34","DE-294-26","DE-6-295","DE-5-14","DE-6-260","DE-6-282","DE-6-284","DE-6-286","DE-6-293","DE-6-326","DE-5-34","DE-294-30","DE-6-139b","DE-294-17","DE-5-185","DE-6-336","DE-5-91","DE-6-334","DE-5-183","DE-294-29","DE-987","DE-294-61","DE-6-337","DE-5-175","DE-294-38","DE-5-60","DE-5-58","DE-5-90","DE-5-108","DE-294-35","DE-1383a","DE-5-74","DE-294-55","DE-6-256","DE-385-EX","DE-38-418","DE-465-KWI","DE-1383","DE-38-414","DE-38-426","DE-5-198","DE-38-460","DE-38-401","DE-38-101","DE-38-429","DE-Sie5","DE-38-405","DE-294-19","DE-5-82","DE-5-41","DE-5-205","DE-5-61","DE-5-161","DE-1105","DE-38-623","DE-Bm3-2","DE-Bm3","DE-38-411","DE-385-823","DE-38-132","DE-294-13","DE-6-022","DE-38-427","DE-6-257","DE-38-622","DE-38-404","DE-294-15","DE-38-438","DE-5-169","DE-575-1"]}],"RecordIdentifier":{"identifierForTheRecord":"HT002093334"},"CatalogDate":{"value":"19991215"},"CatalogDateOfLastUpdate":{"value":"20151223"},"IdentifierRegion":{"identifierRegion":"HBZHT002093334"},"RecordCodes":{"value":["Autopsie","MAB-Zeichenvorrat","Unicode / ISO 10646 (UTF 8)","RAK-WB","Sachtitelwerk","Ordnungssachtitel ist der Inhalt des Feldes 331"]},"Country":{"countryCode":"Deutschland"},"Language":{"language":"Deutsch"},"Carrier":{"value":"Druckschrift"},"Type":{"value":"Schriftenreihe"},"IdentifierOfProcessingInstitution":{"identifier":"466"},"Identifier":{"identifier":"HBZ/Red"},"ClassifierBibliographic":{"classifier":"VERLEGERREIHE OHNE VERKNÜPFUNG AB 2016"},"UpdateAndAccess":{"value":"60"},"TitleStatement":{"title":"Kohlhammer-Urban-Taschenbücher"},"TitleOther":[{"title":"Urban-Bücher"},{"title":"Urban-Taschenbücher"},{"title":"Kohlhammer-Taschenbücher"}],"ChronologyAndEnumeration":{"value":"1.1953 -"},"PublicationPlace":{"printingPlace":"Stuttgart"},"PublisherName":{"printerName":"Kohlhammer"},"DateFirst":{"date":"1953"},"DescriptionOfAdditionalTitle":{"prefix":"Nebent. teils","description":"Urban-Taschenbücher. - Teils: Kohlhammer-Taschenbücher"},"DescriptionOfUniformTitle":{"prefix":"Hauptsacht. teils","description":"Urban-Bücher. - Teils: Urban-Taschenbücher. - Teils: Kohlhammer-Taschenbücher"},"DescriptionOfRelatedEditions":{"prefix":"Online-Ausg.","description":"Kohlhammer-Urban-Taschenbücher","identifier":"HT018446210"},"RecordLocalOwner":[{"localOwner":"A0001"},{"localOwner":"A2007"},{"localOwner":"A2011"},{"localOwner":"A2015"},{"localOwner":"A2036"},{"localOwner":"A2037"},{"localOwner":"A2040"},{"localOwner":"A2041"},{"localOwner":"A2057"},{"localOwner":"A5001"},{"localOwner":"B0001"},{"localOwner":"B1001"},{"localOwner":"B2001"},{"localOwner":"B3001"},{"localOwner":"B4002"},{"localOwner":"B4003"},{"localOwner":"B4006"},{"localOwner":"B4009"},{"localOwner":"B4010"},{"localOwner":"B4011"},{"localOwner":"B4012"},{"localOwner":"B4013"},{"localOwner":"B4014"},{"localOwner":"B4015"},{"localOwner":"B4016"},{"localOwner":"B4017"},{"localOwner":"B4018"},{"localOwner":"B4020"},{"localOwner":"B4021"},{"localOwner":"B4022"},{"localOwner":"B4024"},{"localOwner":"B4025"},{"localOwner":"B4026"},{"localOwner":"B4028"},{"localOwner":"B4033"},{"localOwner":"B4037"},{"localOwner":"B4042"},{"localOwner":"B4046"},{"localOwner":"B4047"},{"localOwner":"B4056"},{"localOwner":"B5001"},{"localOwner":"C0001"},{"localOwner":"C5001"},{"localOwner":"G5001"},{"localOwner":"J5001"},{"localOwner":"K0001"},{"localOwner":"K5001"},{"localOwner":"KM001"},{"localOwner":"L0001"},{"localOwner":"L5001"},{"localOwner":"M0001"},{"localOwner":"M0002"},{"localOwner":"M0003"},{"localOwner":"M0004"},{"localOwner":"M1006"},{"localOwner":"M1007"},{"localOwner":"M1008"},{"localOwner":"M1010"},{"localOwner":"M1011"},{"localOwner":"M1012"},{"localOwner":"M1014"},{"localOwner":"M1015"},{"localOwner":"M1021"},{"localOwner":"M1035"},{"localOwner":"M1036"},{"localOwner":"M1037"},{"localOwner":"M1038"},{"localOwner":"M1043"},{"localOwner":"M1044"},{"localOwner":"M1045"},{"localOwner":"M1046"},{"localOwner":"M1049"},{"localOwner":"M1052"},{"localOwner":"M1054"},{"localOwner":"M1055"},{"localOwner":"M1059"},{"localOwner":"M1061"},{"localOwner":"M1062"},{"localOwner":"M1063"},{"localOwner":"M1064"},{"localOwner":"M1066"},{"localOwner":"M1071"},{"localOwner":"M1073"},{"localOwner":"M1074"},{"localOwner":"M1075"},{"localOwner":"M1083"},{"localOwner":"M1084"},{"localOwner":"M1089"},{"localOwner":"M1092"},{"localOwner":"M1093"},{"localOwner":"M1096"},{"localOwner":"M1097"},{"localOwner":"M1099"},{"localOwner":"M1101"},{"localOwner":"M1102"},{"localOwner":"M1114"},{"localOwner":"M1115"},{"localOwner":"M1125"},{"localOwner":"M1127"},{"localOwner":"M1129"},{"localOwner":"M1130"},{"localOwner":"M1131"},{"localOwner":"M1135"},{"localOwner":"M1138"},{"localOwner":"M1140"},{"localOwner":"M1160"},{"localOwner":"M1162"},{"localOwner":"M1164"},{"localOwner":"M1168"},{"localOwner":"M1170"},{"localOwner":"M1172"},{"localOwner":"M1175"},{"localOwner":"M1184"},{"localOwner":"M1185"},{"localOwner":"M1192"},{"localOwner":"M1200"},{"localOwner":"M1216"},{"localOwner":"M1219"},{"localOwner":"M1220"},{"localOwner":"M1221"},{"localOwner":"M1223"},{"localOwner":"M1224"},{"localOwner":"M5001"},{"localOwner":"N5001"},{"localOwner":"O9023"},{"localOwner":"Q0001"},{"localOwner":"Q0003"},{"localOwner":"Q1005"},{"localOwner":"Q1016"},{"localOwner":"Q1024"},{"localOwner":"Q1026"},{"localOwner":"Q1027"},{"localOwner":"Q1037"},{"localOwner":"Q1045"},{"localOwner":"Q1046"},{"localOwner":"Q1047"},{"localOwner":"Q1048"},{"localOwner":"Q1049"},{"localOwner":"Q1050"},{"localOwner":"Q1052"},{"localOwner":"Q1055"},{"localOwner":"Q1064"},{"localOwner":"Q1074"},{"localOwner":"Q1085"},{"localOwner":"Q1091"},{"localOwner":"Q1097"},{"localOwner":"Q1105"},{"localOwner":"Q1107"},{"localOwner":"Q1108"},{"localOwner":"Q1119"},{"localOwner":"Q1133"},{"localOwner":"Q1135"},{"localOwner":"Q1142"},{"localOwner":"Q1147"},{"localOwner":"Q1148"},{"localOwner":"Q1149"},{"localOwner":"Q1158"},{"localOwner":"Q1160"},{"localOwner":"Q1162"},{"localOwner":"Q1163"},{"localOwner":"QL001"},{"localOwner":"R0001"},{"localOwner":"R0002"},{"localOwner":"R0003"},{"localOwner":"R1007"},{"localOwner":"SM001"},{"localOwner":"T0010"},{"localOwner":"T0012"},{"localOwner":"U0001"},{"localOwner":"U5001"},{"localOwner":"V0001"},{"localOwner":"X5001"},{"localOwner":"Z9005"},{"localOwner":"Z9007"},{"localOwner":"Q1157"},{"localOwner":"Q1004"},{"localOwner":"B4023"},{"localOwner":"Q1146"},{"localOwner":"B4041"},{"localOwner":"F5002"},{"localOwner":"M1017"},{"localOwner":"M1136"},{"localOwner":"J5005"},{"localOwner":"A3128"},{"localOwner":"M1139"},{"localOwner":"F5001"},{"localOwner":"Q1036"},{"localOwner":"Q1136"},{"localOwner":"Q1070"},{"localOwner":"Q1109"},{"localOwner":"Q1151"},{"localOwner":"O9007"},{"localOwner":"F5011"},{"localOwner":"R2001"},{"localOwner":"R5001"},{"localOwner":"Z9037"},{"localOwner":"Z9042"},{"localOwner":"Z9038"},{"localOwner":"Z9045"},{"localOwner":"X6001"},{"localOwner":"D0001"},{"localOwner":"S0001"},{"localOwner":"RL002"},{"localOwner":"Q1062"},{"localOwner":"K1032"},{"localOwner":"K1188"},{"localOwner":"F5010"},{"localOwner":"M1098"},{"localOwner":"K1140"},{"localOwner":"K1128"},{"localOwner":"K1126"},{"localOwner":"M1137"},{"localOwner":"K1117"},{"localOwner":"K1161"},{"localOwner":"K1131"},{"localOwner":"B4007"},{"localOwner":"K1100"},{"localOwner":"K1113"},{"localOwner":"K1103"},{"localOwner":"K1108"},{"localOwner":"M1016"},{"localOwner":"B4004"},{"localOwner":"K1110"},{"localOwner":"T0006"},{"localOwner":"P0001"},{"localOwner":"K1125"},{"localOwner":"K1137"},{"localOwner":"K1144"},{"localOwner":"K1133"},{"localOwner":"K1167"},{"localOwner":"K1166"},{"localOwner":"K1109"},{"localOwner":"K1162"},{"localOwner":"K6001"},{"localOwner":"Q1043"},{"localOwner":"K1104"}],"rak":[{"carrier":"Druckschrift"},{"type":"Schriftenreihe"}],"dc":[{"type":"Schriftenreihe"},{"coverage":"Deutschland"},{"format":"Gedruckte Ressource"},{"date":1953},{"language":"Deutsch"}],"rda":[{"carrier":"Band"},{"content":"Text"},{"media":"ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen"}]} |
{
"id": "294d71bb-ca22-2ebf-1217-895b2f411df2",
"offset": "1838",
"occurred": "2015-11-13T17:02:29.393Z",
"processed": "2015-11-13T17:02:29.393Z",
"device": {
"ios_channel": "860b7385-cafc-435d-b341-15cf16063da8"
},
"type": "FIRST_OPEN"
} |
{
"type" : "record",
"namespace" : "hortonworks.hdp.refapp.trucking",
"name" : "truckgeoeventkafka",
"fields" : [
{ "name" : "eventTime" , "type" : "string" },
{ "name" : "eventTimeLong" , "type" : "long", "default": 0 },
{ "name" : "eventSource" , "type" : "string" },
{ "name" : "truckId" , "type" : "int" },
{ "name" : "driverId" , "type" : "int"},
{ "name" : "driverName" , "type" : "string"},
{ "name" : "routeId" , "type" : "int"},
{ "name" : "route" , "type" : "string"},
{ "name" : "eventType" , "type" : "string"},
{ "name" : "latitude" , "type" : "double"},
{ "name" : "longitude" , "type" : "double"},
{ "name" : "correlationId" , "type" : "long"},
{ "name" : "geoAddress", "type" : ["string", "null"], "default": "No Address Available"}
]
}
|
{
"date_blocked": null,
"citation": {
"state_cite_three": null,
"federal_cite_one": null,
"federal_cite_two": null,
"specialty_cite_one": null,
"federal_cite_three": null,
"lexis_cite": null,
"document_uris": [
"/api/rest/v2/document/800858/"
],
"scotus_early_cite": null,
"case_name": "Blueford v. Arkansas",
"westlaw_cite": null,
"state_cite_one": null,
"neutral_cite": null,
"state_cite_regional": null,
"state_cite_two": null,
"docket_number": "10-1320",
"id": 773616,
"resource_uri": "/api/rest/v2/citation/773616/"
},
"id": 800858,
"blocked": false,
"judges": "",
"court": "/api/rest/v2/jurisdiction/scotus/",
"date_filed": "2012-05-24",
"download_url": "http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1320.pdf",
"source": "C",
"local_path": "pdf/2012/05/24/blueford_v._arkansas.pdf",
"html_lawbox": "",
"time_retrieved": "2012-05-24T07:22:33",
"nature_of_suit": "",
"plain_text": "(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337.\n\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n\n Syllabus\n\n BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS\n\n No. 10\u20131320. Argued February 22, 2012\u2014Decided May 24, 2012\nThe State of Arkansas charged petitioner Alex Blueford with capital\n murder for the death of a one-year-old child. That charge included\n the lesser offenses of first-degree murder, manslaughter, and negli-\n gent homicide. Before the start of deliberations, the trial court in-\n structed the jury to consider the offenses as follows: \u201cIf you have a\n reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge of capital\n murder, you will consider the charge of murder in the first degree. . . .\n If you have a reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge\n of murder in the first degree, you will then consider the charge of\n manslaughter. . . . If you have a reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s\n guilt on the charge of manslaughter, you will then consider the\n charge of negligent homicide.\u201d The court also presented the jury with\n a set of verdict forms, which allowed the jury either to convict\n Blueford of one of the charged offenses, or to acquit him of all of\n them. Acquitting on some but not others was not an option.\n After deliberating for a few hours, the jury reported that it could\n not reach a verdict. The court inquired about the jury\u2019s progress on\n each offense. The foreperson disclosed that the jury was unanimous\n against guilt on the charges of capital murder and first-degree mur-\n der, was deadlocked on manslaughter, and had not voted on negli-\n gent homicide. The court told the jury to continue to deliberate. The\n jury did so but still could not reach a verdict, and the court declared a\n mistrial. When the State subsequently sought to retry Blueford, he\n moved to dismiss the capital and first-degree murder charges on dou-\n ble jeopardy grounds. The trial court denied the motion, and the Su-\n preme Court of Arkansas affirmed on interlocutory appeal.\nHeld: The Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar retrying Blueford on\n charges of capital murder and first-degree murder. Pp. 5\u221210.\n (a) The jury did not acquit Blueford of capital or first-degree mur-\n2 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Syllabus\n\n der. Blueford contends that the foreperson\u2019s report that the jury was\n unanimous against guilt on the murder offenses represented a reso-\n lution of some or all of the elements of those offenses in his favor.\n But the report was not a final resolution of anything. When the fore-\n person told the court how the jury had voted on each offense, the jury\u2019s\n deliberations had not yet concluded. The jurors in fact went back to\n the jury room to deliberate further, and nothing in the court\u2019s in-\n structions prohibited them from reconsidering their votes on capital\n and first-degree murder as deliberations continued. The foreperson\u2019s\n report prior to the end of deliberations therefore lacked the finality\n necessary to amount to an acquittal on those offenses. That same\n lack of finality undermines Blueford\u2019s reliance on Green v. United\n States, 355 U. S. 184, and Price v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323. In both of\n those cases, the verdict of the jury was a final decision; here, the re-\n port of the foreperson was not. Pp. 5\u22128.\n (b) The trial court\u2019s declaration of a mistrial was not improper. A\n trial can be discontinued without barring a subsequent one for the\n same offense when \u201cparticular circumstances manifest a necessity\u201d to\n declare a mistrial. Wade v. Hunter, 336 U. S. 684, 690. Blueford con-\n tends that there was no necessity for a mistrial on capital and first-\n degree murder, given the foreperson\u2019s report that the jury had voted\n unanimously against guilt on those charges. According to Blueford,\n the court at that time should have taken some action, whether\n through new partial verdict forms or other means, to allow the jury to\n give effect to those votes, and then considered a mistrial only as to\n the remaining charges. Blueford acknowledges, however, that the\n trial court\u2019s reason for declaring a mistrial here\u2014that the jury was\n unable to reach a verdict\u2014has long been considered the \u201cclassic ba-\n sis\u201d establishing necessity for doing so. Arizona v. Washington, 434\n U. S. 497, 509. And this Court has never required a trial court, be-\n fore declaring a mistrial because of a hung jury, to consider any par-\n ticular means of breaking the impasse\u2015let alone to consider giving\n the jury new options for a verdict. See Renico v. Lett, 559 U. S. ___,\n ___. As permitted under Arkansas law, the jury\u2019s options in this case\n were limited to two: either convict on one of the offenses, or acquit on\n all. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to add an-\n other option\u2014that of acquitting on some offenses but not others.\n Pp. 9\u221210.\n2011 Ark. 8, ___ S. W. 3d ___, affirmed.\n\n ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SCALIA,\nKENNEDY, THOMAS, BREYER, and ALITO, JJ., joined. SOTOMAYOR, J.,\nfiled a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and KAGAN, JJ., joined.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 1\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the\n preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to\n notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-\n ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order\n that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.\n\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n _________________\n\n No. 10\u20131320\n _________________\n\n\n ALEX BLUEFORD, PETITIONER v. ARKANSAS\n ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF\n\n ARKANSAS\n\n [May 24, 2012] \n\n\n CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the\nCourt.\n The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against being\ntried twice for the same offense. The Clause does not,\nhowever, bar a second trial if the first ended in a mistrial.\nBefore the jury concluded deliberations in this case, it re-\nported that it was unanimous against guilt on charges of\ncapital murder and first-degree murder, was deadlocked\non manslaughter, and had not voted on negligent homi-\ncide. The court told the jury to continue to deliberate.\nThe jury did so but still could not reach a verdict, and the\ncourt declared a mistrial. All agree that the defendant\nmay be retried on charges of manslaughter and negligent\nhomicide. The question is whether he may also be retried\non charges of capital and first-degree murder.\n I\n One-year-old Matthew McFadden, Jr., suffered a severe\nhead injury on November 28, 2007, while home with his\nmother\u2019s boyfriend, Alex Blueford. Despite treatment at a\nhospital, McFadden died a few days later.\n The State of Arkansas charged Blueford with capital\nmurder, but waived the death penalty. The State\u2019s theory\n2 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\nat trial was that Blueford had injured McFadden inten-\ntionally, causing the boy\u2019s death \u201c[u]nder circumstances\nmanifesting extreme indifference to the value of human\nlife.\u201d Ark. Code Ann. \u00a75\u201310\u2013101(a)(9)(A) (Supp. 2011).\nThe defense, in contrast, portrayed the death as the re-\nsult of Blueford accidentally knocking McFadden onto the\nground.\n The trial court instructed the jury that the charge of\ncapital murder included three lesser offenses: first-degree\nmurder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide. In addi-\ntion to describing these offenses, the court addressed the\norder in which the jury was to consider them: \u201cIf you have\na reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge\nof capital murder, you will consider the charge of murder\nin the first degree. . . . If you have a reasonable doubt of\nthe defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge of murder in the first\ndegree, you will then consider the charge of manslaugh-\nter. . . . If you have a reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s\nguilt on the charge of manslaughter, you will then con-\nsider the charge of negligent homicide.\u201d App. 51\u201352.\n The prosecution commented on these instructions in its\nclosing argument. It told the jury, for example, that \u201cbe-\nfore you can consider a lesser included of capital murder,\nyou must first, all 12, vote that this man is not guilty of\ncapital murder.\u201d Id., at 55. The prosecution explained\nthat this was \u201cnot a situation where you just lay every-\nthing out here and say, well, we have four choices. Which\none does it fit the most?\u201d Id., at 59. Rather, the prose-\ncution emphasized, \u201cunless all 12 of you agree that this\nman\u2019s actions were not consistent with capital murder,\nthen and only then would you go down to murder in the\nfirst degree.\u201d Ibid.\n After the parties concluded their arguments, the court\npresented the jury with a set of five verdict forms, each\nrepresenting a possible verdict. There were four separate\nforms allowing the jury to convict on each of the charged\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 3\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\noffenses: capital murder, first-degree murder, manslaugh-\nter, and negligent homicide. A fifth form allowed the jury\nto return a verdict of acquittal, if the jury found Blueford\nnot guilty of any offense. There was no form allowing the\njury to acquit on some offenses but not others. As stated\nin the court\u2019s instructions, the jury could either \u201cfind the\ndefendant guilty of one of these offenses\u201d or \u201cacquit him\noutright.\u201d Id., at 51. Any verdict\u2014whether to convict on\none or to acquit on all\u2014had to be unanimous.\n A few hours after beginning its deliberations, the jury\nsent the court a note asking \u201cwhat happens if we cannot\nagree on a charge at all.\u201d Id., at 62. The court called the\njury back into the courtroom and issued a so-called \u201cAllen\ninstruction,\u201d emphasizing the importance of reaching a ver-\ndict. See Allen v. United States, 164 U. S. 492, 501\u2013502\n(1896). The jury then deliberated for a half hour more\nbefore sending out a second note, stating that it \u201ccannot\nagree on any one charge in this case.\u201d App. 64. When the\ncourt summoned the jury again, the jury foreperson re-\nported that the jury was \u201chopelessly\u201d deadlocked. Ibid.\nThe court asked the foreperson to disclose the jury\u2019s votes\non each offense:\n \u201cTHE COURT: All right. If you have your numbers\n together, and I don\u2019t want names, but if you have your\n numbers I would like to know what your count was on\n capital murder.\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: That was unanimous\n against that. No.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Okay, on murder in the first degree?\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: That was unanimous\n against that.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Okay. Manslaughter?\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: Nine for, three against.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Okay. And negligent homicide?\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: We did not vote on that,\n4 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n sir.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Did not vote on that.\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: No, sir. We couldn\u2019t get\n past the manslaughter. Were we supposed to go past\n that? I thought we were supposed to go one at a\n time.\u201d Id., at 64\u201365.\n Following this exchange, the court gave another Allen\ninstruction and sent the jurors back to the jury room.\nAfter deliberations resumed, Blueford\u2019s counsel asked the\ncourt to submit new verdict forms to the jurors, to be\ncompleted \u201cfor those counts that they have reached a\nverdict on.\u201d Id., at 67. The prosecution objected on the\ngrounds that the jury was \u201cstill deliberating\u201d and that a\nverdict of acquittal had to be \u201call or nothing.\u201d Id., at 68.\nThe court denied Blueford\u2019s request. To allow for a partial\nverdict, the court explained, would be \u201clike changing\nhorses in the middle of the stream,\u201d given that the jury\nhad already received instructions and verdict forms. Ibid.\nThe court informed counsel that it would declare a mis-\ntrial \u201cif the jury doesn\u2019t make a decision.\u201d Id., at 69.\n When the jury returned a half hour later, the foreperson\nstated that they had not reached a verdict. The court\ndeclared a mistrial and discharged the jury.\n The State subsequently sought to retry Blueford. He\nmoved to dismiss the capital and first-degree murder\ncharges on double jeopardy grounds, citing the foreper-\nson\u2019s report that the jurors had voted unanimously against\nguilt on those offenses. The trial court denied the motion,\nand the Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed on interlocu-\ntory appeal. According to the State Supreme Court, the\nforeperson\u2019s report had no effect on the State\u2019s ability to\nretry Blueford, because the foreperson \u201cwas not making a\nformal announcement of acquittal\u201d when she disclosed the\njury\u2019s votes. 2011 Ark. 8, p. 9, ___ S. W. 3d ___, ___. This\nwas not a case, the court observed, \u201cwhere a formal verdict\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 5\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\nwas announced or entered of record.\u201d Ibid. The court\nadded that the trial court did not err in denying Blueford\u2019s\nrequest for new verdict forms that would have allowed the\njury to render a partial verdict on the charges of capital\nand first-degree murder.\n Blueford sought review in this Court, and we granted\ncertiorari. 565 U. S. ___ (2011).\n II\n The Double Jeopardy Clause provides that no person\nshall \u201cbe subject for the same offence to be twice put in\njeopardy of life or limb.\u201d U. S. Const., Amdt. 5. The\nClause \u201cguarantees that the State shall not be permitted\nto make repeated attempts to convict the accused, thereby\nsubjecting him to embarrassment, expense and ordeal and\ncompelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and\ninsecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even\nthough innocent he may be found guilty.\u201d United States v.\nMartin Linen Supply Co., 430 U. S. 564, 569 (1977) (inter-\nnal quotation marks omitted).\n Blueford contends that the foreperson\u2019s report means\nthat he cannot be tried again on charges of capital and\nfirst-degree murder. According to Blueford, the Double\nJeopardy Clause prohibits a second trial on those charges,\nfor two reasons.\n A\n Blueford\u2019s primary submission is that he cannot be\nretried for capital and first-degree murder because the\njury actually acquitted him of those offenses. See Green v.\nUnited States, 355 U. S. 184, 188 (1957). The Arkansas\nSupreme Court noted\u2014and Blueford acknowledges\u2014that\nno formal judgment of acquittal was entered in his case.\nBut none was necessary, Blueford maintains, because an\nacquittal is a matter of substance, not form. Quoting from\nour decision in Martin Linen, supra, at 571, Blueford\n6 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\ncontends that despite the absence of a formal verdict, a\njury\u2019s announcement constitutes an acquittal if it \u201c \u2018actu-\nally represents a resolution . . . of some or all of the factual\nelements of the offense charged.\u2019 \u201d Brief for Petitioner 21.\nHere, according to Blueford, the foreperson\u2019s announce-\nment of the jury\u2019s unanimous votes on capital and first-\ndegree murder represented just that: a resolution of some\nor all of the elements of those offenses in Blueford\u2019s favor.\n We disagree. The foreperson\u2019s report was not a final\nresolution of anything. When the foreperson told the court\nhow the jury had voted on each offense, the jury\u2019s deliber-\nations had not yet concluded. The jurors in fact went back\nto the jury room to deliberate further, even after the fore-\nperson had delivered her report. When they emerged a\nhalf hour later, the foreperson stated only that they were\nunable to reach a verdict. She gave no indication whether\nit was still the case that all 12 jurors believed Blueford\nwas not guilty of capital or first-degree murder, that 9 of\nthem believed he was guilty of manslaughter, or that a\nvote had not been taken on negligent homicide. The fact\nthat deliberations continued after the report deprives that\nreport of the finality necessary to constitute an acquittal\non the murder offenses.\n Blueford maintains, however, that any possibility that\nthe jurors revisited the murder offenses was foreclosed by\nthe instructions given to the jury. Those instructions, he\ncontends, not only required the jury to consider the of-\nfenses in order, from greater to lesser, but also prevented\nit from transitioning from one offense to the next with-\nout unanimously\u2014and definitively\u2014resolving the greater\noffense in his favor. \u201cA jury is presumed to follow its\ninstructions.\u201d Weeks v. Angelone, 528 U. S. 225, 234\n(2000). So, Blueford says, the foreperson\u2019s report that the\njury was deadlocked on manslaughter necessarily estab-\nlishes that the jury had acquitted Blueford of the greater\noffenses of capital and first-degree murder.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 7\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n But even if we assume that the instructions required a\nunanimous vote before the jury could consider a lesser\noffense\u2014as the State assumes for purposes of this case,\nsee Brief for Respondent 25, n. 3\u2014nothing in the instruc-\ntions prohibited the jury from reconsidering such a vote.\nThe instructions said simply, \u201cIf you have a reasonable\ndoubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge of [the greater\noffense], you will [then] consider the charge of [the lesser\noffense].\u201d App. 51\u201352. The jurors were never told that\nonce they had a reasonable doubt, they could not rethink\nthe issue. The jury was free to reconsider a greater of-\nfense, even after considering a lesser one.1\n A simple example illustrates the point. A jury enters\nthe jury room, having just been given these instructions.\nThe foreperson decides that it would make sense to deter-\nmine the extent of the jurors\u2019 agreement before discus-\nsions begin. Accordingly, she conducts a vote on capital\nmurder, and everyone votes against guilt. She does the\nsame for first-degree murder, and again, everyone votes\nagainst guilt. She then calls for a vote on manslaughter,\nand there is disagreement. Only then do the jurors en-\ngage in a discussion about the circumstances of the crime.\nWhile considering the arguments of the other jurors on\nhow the death was caused, one of the jurors starts rethink-\ning his own stance on a greater offense. After reflecting on\nthe evidence, he comes to believe that the defendant did\nknowingly cause the death\u2014satisfying the definition of\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 1 In reaching a contrary conclusion, post, at 6 (opinion of SOTOMAYOR,\n\nJ.), the dissent construes the jury instructions to \u201crequire a jury to\ncomplete its deliberations on a greater offense before it may consider a\nlesser,\u201d post, at 3 (emphasis added). But no such requirement can be\nfound in the text of the instructions themselves. And the dissent\u2019s\nattempt to glean such a requirement from the Arkansas Supreme\nCourt\u2019s decision in Hughes v. State, 347 Ark. 696, 66 S. W. 3d 645\n(2002), is unavailing, for that decision nowhere addresses the issue\nhere\u2014whether a jury can reconsider a greater offense after considering\na lesser one.\n8 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\nfirst-degree murder. At that point, nothing in the instruc-\ntions prohibits the jury from doing what juries often do:\nrevisit a prior vote. \u201cThe very object of the jury system,\u201d\nafter all, \u201cis to secure unanimity by a comparison of views,\nand by arguments among the jurors themselves.\u201d Allen,\n164 U. S., at 501. A single juror\u2019s change of mind is all it\ntakes to require the jury to reconsider a greater offense.\n It was therefore possible for Blueford\u2019s jury to revisit the\noffenses of capital and first-degree murder, notwithstand-\ning its earlier votes. And because of that possibility, the\nforeperson\u2019s report prior to the end of deliberations lacked\nthe finality necessary to amount to an acquittal on those\noffenses, quite apart from any requirement that a formal\nverdict be returned or judgment entered.\n That same lack of finality undermines Blueford\u2019s reli-\nance on Green v. United States, 355 U. S. 184 (1957), and\nPrice v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323 (1970). In those cases, we\nheld that the Double Jeopardy Clause is violated when\na defendant, tried for a greater offense and convicted of\na lesser included offense, is later retried for the greater\noffense. See Green, supra, at 190; Price, supra, at 329.\nBlueford argues that the only fact distinguishing his case\nfrom Green and Price is that his case involves a deadlock\non the lesser included offense, as opposed to a conviction.\nIn his view, that distinction only favors him, because the\nDouble Jeopardy Clause should, if anything, afford greater\nprotection to a defendant who is not found guilty of the\nlesser included offense.\n Blueford\u2019s argument assumes, however, that the votes\nreported by the foreperson did not change, even though\nthe jury deliberated further after that report. That as-\nsumption is unjustified, because the reported votes were,\nfor the reasons noted, not final. Blueford thus overlooks\nthe real distinction between the cases: In Green and Price,\nthe verdict of the jury was a final decision; here, the report\nof the foreperson was not.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 9\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n B\n Blueford maintains that even if the jury did not acquit\nhim of capital and first-degree murder, a second trial on\nthose offenses would nonetheless violate the Double Jeop-\nardy Clause, because the trial court\u2019s declaration of a\nmistrial was improper. Blueford acknowledges that a trial\ncan be discontinued without barring a subsequent one for\nthe same offense when \u201cparticular circumstances manifest\na necessity\u201d to declare a mistrial. Wade v. Hunter, 336\nU. S. 684, 690 (1949); see also United States v. Perez, 9\nWheat. 579, 580 (1824). He also acknowledges that the\ntrial court\u2019s reason for declaring a mistrial here\u2014that\nthe jury was unable to reach a verdict\u2014has long been con-\nsidered the \u201cclassic basis\u201d establishing such a necessity.\nArizona v. Washington, 434 U. S. 497, 509 (1978).\nBlueford therefore accepts that a second trial on man-\nslaughter and negligent homicide would pose no double\njeopardy problem. He contends, however, that there was\nno necessity for a mistrial on capital and first-degree\nmurder, given the foreperson\u2019s report that the jury had\nvoted unanimously against guilt on those charges. Accord-\ning to Blueford, the court at that time should have taken\n\u201csome action,\u201d whether through partial verdict forms or\nother means, to allow the jury to give effect to those votes,\nand then considered a mistrial only as to the remaining\ncharges. Reply Brief for Petitioner 11, n. 8.\n We reject that suggestion. We have never required a\ntrial court, before declaring a mistrial because of a hung\njury, to consider any particular means of breaking the\nimpasse\u2014let alone to consider giving the jury new options\nfor a verdict. See Renico v. Lett, 559 U. S. ___, ___ (2010)\n(slip op., at 8).2 As permitted under Arkansas law, the\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 2 Finding our reliance on Renico \u201cperplexing,\u201d the dissent reads that\n\ndecision to have \u201clittle to say about a trial judge\u2019s responsibilities, or\nthis Court\u2019s, on direct review.\u201d Post, at 10\u201311, n. 4. But Renico\u2019s\n10 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\njury\u2019s options in this case were limited to two: either con-\nvict on one of the offenses, or acquit on all. The instruc-\ntions explained those options in plain terms, and the\nverdict forms likewise contemplated no other outcome.\nThere were separate forms to convict on each of the possi-\nble offenses, but there was only one form to acquit, and it\nwas to acquit on all of them. When the foreperson dis-\nclosed the jury\u2019s votes on capital and first-degree murder,\nthe trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to\nadd another option\u2014that of acquitting on some offenses\nbut not others. That, however, is precisely the relief\nBlueford seeks\u2014relief the Double Jeopardy Clause does\nnot afford him.\n * * *\n The jury in this case did not convict Blueford of any\noffense, but it did not acquit him of any either. When the\njury was unable to return a verdict, the trial court prop-\nerly declared a mistrial and discharged the jury. As a\nconsequence, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not stand\nin the way of a second trial on the same offenses.\n The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arkansas is\n\n Affirmed.\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014 \n\ndiscussion of the applicable legal principles concerns just that, and the \n\ndissent in any event does not dispute that we have never required a \n\ntrial court to consider any particular means of breaking a jury impasse.\n\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 1\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n _________________\n\n No. 10\u20131320\n _________________\n\n\n ALEX BLUEFORD, PETITIONER v. ARKANSAS\n ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF\n\n ARKANSAS\n\n [May 24, 2012] \n\n\n JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG\nand JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting.\n The Double Jeopardy Clause \u201cunequivocally prohibits a\nsecond trial following an acquittal.\u201d Arizona v. Washing-\nton, 434 U. S. 497, 503 (1978). To implement this rule, our\ncases have articulated two principles. First, an acquittal\noccurs if a jury\u2019s decision, \u201cwhatever its label, actually rep-\nresents a resolution, correct or not, of some or all of the\nfactual elements of the offense charged.\u201d United States v.\nMartin Linen Supply Co., 430 U. S. 564, 571 (1977). Sec-\nond, a trial judge may not defeat a defendant\u2019s entitlement\nto \u201cthe verdict of a tribunal he might believe to be favora-\nbly disposed to his fate\u201d by declaring a mistrial before\ndeliberations end, absent a defendant\u2019s consent or a\n\u201c \u2018manifest necessity\u2019 \u201d to do so. United States v. Jorn, 400\nU. S. 470, 486, 481 (1971) (plurality opinion) (quoting\nUnited States v. Perez, 9 Wheat. 579, 580 (1824)).\n Today\u2019s decision misapplies these longstanding prin-\nciples. The Court holds that petitioner Alex Blueford\nwas not acquitted of capital or first-degree murder, even\nthough the forewoman of the Arkansas jury empaneled to\ntry him announced in open court that the jury was \u201cunan-\nimous against\u201d convicting Blueford of those crimes. Nor,\nthe Court concludes, did the Double Jeopardy Clause\noblige the trial judge to take any action to give effect to the\njury\u2019s unambiguous decision before declaring a mistrial as\n2 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nto those offenses. The Court thus grants the State what\nthe Constitution withholds: \u201cthe proverbial \u2018second bite at\nthe apple.\u2019 \u201d Burks v. United States, 437 U. S. 1, 17 (1978).\n I respectfully dissent.\n I\n\n A\n\n The bar on retrials following acquittals is \u201cthe most\nfundamental rule in the history of double jeopardy juris-\nprudence.\u201d Martin Linen, 430 U. S., at 571; see, e.g.,\nUnited States v. Ball, 163 U. S. 662, 671 (1896); 4 W.\nBlackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 329\n(1769). This prohibition stops the State, \u201cwith all its\nresources and power,\u201d from mounting abusive, harassing\nreprosecutions, Green v. United States, 355 U. S. 184, 187\n(1957), which subject a defendant to \u201cembarrassment,\nexpense, anxiety, and insecurity, and the possibility that\nhe may be found guilty even though innocent,\u201d United\nStates v. DiFrancesco, 449 U. S. 117, 136 (1980).\n In ascertaining whether an acquittal has occurred,\n\u201cform is not to be exalted over substance.\u201d Sanabria v.\nUnited States, 437 U. S. 54, 66 (1978). Rather, we ask\nwhether the factfinder has made \u201ca substantive determi-\nnation that the prosecution has failed to carry its burden.\u201d\nSmith v. Massachusetts, 543 U. S. 462, 468 (2005). Ju-\nrisdictions have different procedures respecting the an-\nnouncement of verdicts and the entry of judgments, but\nthat diversity has no constitutional significance. Jeopardy\nterminates upon a determination, however characterized,\nthat the \u201cevidence is insufficient\u201d to prove a defendant\u2019s\n\u201cfactual guilt.\u201d Smalis v. Pennsylvania, 476 U. S. 140, 144\n(1986). Thus, we have treated as acquittals a trial judge\u2019s\ndirected verdict of not guilty, Smith, 543 U. S., at 468; an\nappellate reversal of a conviction for insufficiency of the\nevidence, Burks, 437 U. S., at 10; and, most pertinent\nhere, a jury\u2019s announcement of a not guilty verdict that\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 3\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nwas \u201cnot followed by any judgment,\u201d Ball, 163 U. S., at\n671.\n A straightforward application of that principle suffices\nto decide this case. Arkansas is a classic \u201cacquittal-first\u201d\nor \u201chard-transition\u201d jurisdiction. See generally People v.\nRichardson, 184 P. 3d 755, 764, n. 7 (Colo. 2008). Arkan-\nsas\u2019 model jury instructions require a jury to complete its\ndeliberations on a greater offense before it may consider\na lesser. 1 Ark. Model Jury Instr., Crim., No. 302 (2d\ned. 1994). As a matter of Arkansas law, \u201c[b]efore it may\nconsider any lesser-included offense, the jury must first\ndetermine that the proof is insufficient to convict on the\ngreater offense. Thus, the jury must, in essence, acquit\nthe defendant of the greater offense before considering his\nor her guilt on the lesser-included offense.\u201d Hughes v.\nState, 347 Ark. 696, 706\u2013707, 66 S. W. 3d 645, 651 (2002).1\n Here, the trial judge instructed Blueford\u2019s jury to con-\nsider the offenses in order, from the charged offense of\ncapital murder to the lesser included offenses of first-\ndegree murder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide.\nThe judge told the jury to proceed past capital murder only\nupon a unanimous finding of a \u201creasonable doubt\u201d as to\nthat offense\u2014that is, upon an acquittal. See In re Win-\nship, 397 U. S. 358, 363 (1970). The State\u2019s closing argu-\nments repeated this directive: \u201c[B]efore you can consider a\nlesser included of capital murder, you must first, all 12,\nvote that this man is not guilty of capital murder.\u201d App.\n55. And the forewoman\u2019s colloquy with the judge leaves no\ndoubt that the jury understood the instructions to man-\ndate unanimous acquittal on a greater offense as a pre-\nrequisite to consideration of a lesser: The forewoman\n\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 1 The State has taken the same position. See Brief for Appellee in\nBoyd v. State, No. CR 06\u2013973 (Ark.), p. 13 (\u201c[U]nanimity is the essence\nof a jury verdict as it pertains to acquitting a defendant of the charged\noffense and the subsequent consideration of lesser-included offenses\u201d).\n4 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nreported that the jury had not voted on negligent homicide\nbecause the jurors \u201ccouldn\u2019t get past the manslaughter\u201d\ncount on which they were deadlocked. Id., at 65.\n In this context, the forewoman\u2019s announcement in open\ncourt that the jury was \u201cunanimous against\u201d conviction on\ncapital and first-degree murder, id., at 64\u201365, was an\nacquittal for double jeopardy purposes.2 Per Arkansas\nlaw, the jury\u2019s determination of reasonable doubt as to\nthose offenses was an acquittal \u201cin essence.\u201d Hughes, 347\nArk., at 707, 66 S. W. 3d, at 651. By deciding that the\nState \u201chad failed to come forward with sufficient proof,\u201d\nthe jury resolved the charges of capital and first-degree\nmurder adversely to the State. Burks, 437 U. S., at 10.\nThat acquittal cannot be reconsidered without putting\nBlueford twice in jeopardy.\n Green and Price v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323 (1970), bolster\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 2 The jury\u2019s acquittals on the murder counts were unsurprising in\n\nlight of the deficiencies in the State\u2019s case. For example, Dr. Adam\nCraig\u2014the medical examiner who autopsied the victim, Matthew\nMcFadden, Jr., and whose testimony was essential to the State\u2019s theory\nof the crime\u2014was not board certified in anatomical pathology, hav-\ning failed the certification examination five times. Dr. Craig took only\n2 slides of Matthew\u2019s brain, not the 10 to 20 called for by prevail-\ning professional standards. He dismissed Blueford\u2019s explanation for\nMatthew\u2019s death\u2014that Blueford accidentally knocked Matthew to the\nfloor\u2014on the basis of an outdated paper on child head injuries, ac-\nknowledging that he was only \u201cvaguely aware\u201d of a more recent, semi-\nnal paper that supported Blueford\u2019s account. Record 390; see Gold-\nsmith & Plunkett, A Biomechanical Analysis of the Causes of\nTraumatic Brain Injury in Infants and Children, 25 Am. J. Forensic\nMed. & Pathology 89 (2004). Blueford\u2019s expert pathologist, Dr. Robert\nBux, testified that Dr. Craig\u2019s autopsy was inadequate to establish\nwhether Matthew\u2019s death was accidental or intentional. And Blue-\nford\u2019s expert pediatrician, Dr. John Galaznik, testified that the State\u2019s\ntheory\u2014that Blueford slammed Matthew into a mattress on the floor\u2014\nwas \u201cnot a likely cause\u201d of the boy\u2019s injuries when assessed in view of\ncurrent medical literature. Record 766. Even the trial judge observed\nthat the State\u2019s proof was \u201ccircumstantial at best,\u201d and that this was\n\u201cprobably . . . a lesser included offense case.\u201d Id., at 610.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 5\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nthat conclusion. In Green, the jury convicted the defend-\nant on the lesser included offense of second-degree murder\nwithout returning a verdict on the charged offense of first-\ndegree murder. This Court concluded that this result was\nan \u201cimplicit acquittal\u201d on the greater offense of first-\ndegree murder, barring retrial. 355 U. S., at 190. The\ndefendant \u201cwas forced to run the gantlet once on that\ncharge and the jury refused to convict him. When given\nthe choice between finding him guilty of either first or\nsecond degree murder it chose the latter.\u201d Ibid.; see also\nPrice, 398 U. S., at 329 (\u201c[T]his Court has consistently\nrefused to rule that jeopardy for an offense continues after\nan acquittal, whether that acquittal is express or implied\nby a conviction on a lesser included offense when the\njury was given a full opportunity to return a verdict on\nthe greater charge\u201d (footnote omitted)). Notably, Green\nacknowledged that its finding of an \u201cimplicit acquittal\u201d\nwas an \u201cassumption,\u201d because the jury had made no ex-\npress statement with respect to the greater offense. 355\nU. S., at 190\u2013191.\n Blueford\u2019s position is even stronger because his jury was\nnot silent on the murder counts, but announced that it\nwas \u201cunanimous against\u201d conviction. And the trial judge\nspecifically instructed the jury to consider manslaughter\nonly after acquitting Blueford of the murder counts.\nCourts in several acquittal-first jurisdictions have held\nthat a jury\u2019s deadlock on a lesser included offense justifies\nthe assumption that the jury acquitted on any greater\noffenses. See State v. Tate, 256 Conn. 262, 283\u2013285, 773\nA. 2d. 308, 323\u2013324 (2001); Stone v. Superior Ct. of San\nDiego Cty., 31 Cal. 3d 503, 511\u2013512, n. 5, 646 P. 2d 809,\n815, n. 5 (1982). That assumption is not even necessary\nhere because the jury unmistakably announced acquittal.\n B\n The majority holds that the forewoman\u2019s announcement\n6 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nwas not an acquittal because it \u201cwas not a final resolution\nof anything.\u201d Ante, at 6. In the majority\u2019s view, the jury\nmight have revisited its decisions on the murder counts\nduring the 31 minutes of deliberations that followed the\nforewoman\u2019s announcement. We cannot know whether\nthe jury did so, the majority reasons, because the jury was\ndischarged without confirming that it remained \u201cunani-\nmous against\u201d convicting Blueford of capital and first-\ndegree murder. Ante, at 6\u20138.3\n Putting to one side the lack of record evidence to support\nthis speculation\u2014by far the more plausible inference is\nthat the jurors spent those 31 minutes attempting to\nresolve their deadlock on manslaughter\u2014I do not agree\nthat the jury was free to reconsider its decisions when\nits deliberations resumed. \u201cA verdict of acquittal on the\nissue of guilt or innocence is, of course, absolutely final.\u201d\nBullington v. Missouri, 451 U. S. 430, 445 (1981). The\njury heard instructions and argument that it was required\nunanimously to acquit on capital and first-degree murder\nbefore it could reach manslaughter. And as the forewom-\nan\u2019s colloquy makes plain, the jury followed those instruc-\ntions scrupulously. There is no reason to believe that the\njury\u2019s vote was anything other than a verdict in sub-\nstance\u2014that is, a \u201cfinal collective decision . . . reached\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 3 This Court granted certiorari to decide \u201c[w]hether, if a jury dead-\n\nlocks on a lesser-included offense, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars\nreprosecution of a greater offense after a jury announces that it has\nvoted against guilt on the greater offense.\u201d Pet. for Cert. i. The major-\nity resolves the question presented by determining that the forewoman\u2019s\nannouncements were not final, such that Blueford\u2019s jury did not neces-\nsarily deadlock on the lesser included offense of manslaughter. See\nante, at 8\u20139, n. 2. In light of that determination, I do not read today\u2019s\nopinion to express any view with respect to the requirements of the\nDouble Jeopardy Clause where a jury does deadlock on a lesser in-\ncluded offense. Cf., e.g., State v. Tate, 256 Conn. 262, 284\u2013285, 773\nA. 2d 308, 324\u2013325 (2001); Whiteaker v. State, 808 P. 2d 270, 274\n(Alaska App. 1991).\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 7\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nafter full deliberation, consideration, and compromise\namong the individual jurors.\u201d Harrison v. Gillespie, 640\nF. 3d 888, 906 (CA9 2011) (en banc). And when that deci-\nsion was announced in open court, it became entitled to\nfull double jeopardy protection. See, e.g., Commonwealth\nv. Roth, 437 Mass. 777, 796, 776 N. E. 2d 437, 450\u2013451\n(2002) (declining to give effect to \u201c \u2018 \u201cthe verdict received\nfrom the lips of the foreman in open court\u201d \u2019 \u201d would \u201cele-\nvate form over substance\u201d); Stone, 31 Cal. 3d, at 511, 646\nP. 2d, at 814\u2013815 (\u201c[I]n determining what verdict, if any, a\njury intended to return, the oral declaration of the jurors\nendorsing the result is the true return of the verdict\u201d\n(internal quotation marks omitted)); see also, e.g., Dixon v.\nState, 29 Ark. 165, 171 (1874) (technical defect in verdict\n\u201cis of no consequence whatever, for the verdict need not be\nin writing, but may be announced by the foreman of the\njury orally\u201d); State v. Mills, 19 Ark. 476 (1858) (\u201cThe ver-\ndict was of no validity until delivered, by the jury, in\nCourt\u201d).\n The majority\u2019s example of a jury that takes a prelimi-\nnary vote on greater offenses, advances to the considera-\ntion of a lesser, and then returns to a greater, is inapposite.\nSee ante, at 7. In the majority\u2019s example, the jury has\nnot announced its vote in open court. Moreover, the\ninstructions in this case did not contemplate that the\njury\u2019s deliberations could take the course that the majority\nimagines. Arkansas\u2019 model instruction requires acquittal\nas a prerequisite to consideration of a lesser offense, and\nthe Double Jeopardy Clause entitles an acquittal to final-\nity. Indeed, the purpose of an acquittal-first instruction is\nto ensure careful and conclusive deliberation on a greater\noffense. See United States v. Tsanas, 572 F. 2d 340, 346\n(CA2 1978) (Friendly, J.) (acquittal-first instruction avoids\n\u201cthe danger that the jury will not adequately discharge its\nduties with respect to the greater offense, and instead will\nmove too quickly to the lesser\u201d). True, Arkansas\u2019 instruc-\n8 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\ntion does not expressly forbid reconsideration, but it does\nnot expressly permit reconsideration either. In any event,\nnothing indicates that the jury\u2019s announced decisions were\ntentative, compromises, or mere steps en route to a final\nverdict, and the Double Jeopardy Clause demands that\nambiguity be resolved in favor of the defendant. See\nDownum v. United States, 372 U. S. 734, 738 (1963).\n The fact that the jury was not given the express option\nof acquitting on individual offenses is irrelevant. See ante,\nat 3, 9. Arkansas law ascribes no significance to the pres-\nence of such options on a verdict form. See Rowland v.\nState, 263 Ark. 77, 85, 562 S. W. 2d 590, 594 (1978) (\u201cThe\njury may prepare and present its own form of verdict\u201d).\nThe lack of a state procedural vehicle for the entry of a\njudgment of acquittal does not prevent the recognition of\nan acquittal for constitutional purposes. See Hudson v.\nLouisiana, 450 U. S. 40, 41, n. 1 (1981).\n Finally, the majority\u2019s distinction of Green and Price is\nunavailing. The majority observes that Green and Price,\nunlike this case, involved final decisions. Ante, at 8. As I\nhave explained, I view the forewoman\u2019s announcements of\nacquittal in this case as similarly final. In any event,\nGreen clarified that the defendant\u2019s \u201cclaim of former jeop-\nardy\u201d was \u201cnot based on his previous conviction for second\ndegree murder but instead on the original jury\u2019s refusal to\nconvict him of first degree murder.\u201d 355 U. S., at 190,\nn. 11; accord, id., at 194, n. 14. That is, the jury\u2019s silence\non the greater offense spoke with sufficient clarity to\njustify the assumption of acquittal and to invoke the Dou-\nble Jeopardy Clause. Id., at 191; see also Price, 398 U. S.,\nat 329. In light of the forewoman\u2019s announcement, this is\nan a fortiori case.\n In short, the Double Jeopardy Clause demands an in-\nquiry into the substance of the jury\u2019s actions. Blueford\u2019s\njury had the option to convict him of capital and first-\ndegree murder, but expressly declined to do so. That\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 9\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nought to be the end of the matter.\n II\n\n A\n\n Even if the majority were correct that the jury might\nhave reconsidered an acquitted count\u2014a doubtful assump-\ntion for the reasons just explained\u2014that would not defeat\nBlueford\u2019s double jeopardy claim. It \u201chas been long estab-\nlished as an integral part of double jeopardy jurispru-\ndence\u201d that \u201ca defendant could be put in jeopardy even in\na prosecution that did not culminate in a conviction or an\nacquittal.\u201d Crist v. Bretz, 437 U. S. 28, 34 (1978). This\nrule evolved in response to the \u201cabhorrent\u201d practice under\nthe Stuart monarchs of terminating prosecutions, and\nthereby evading the bar on retrials, when it appeared that\nthe Crown\u2019s proof might be insufficient. Washington, 434\nU. S., at 507; see, e.g., Ireland\u2019s Case, 7 How. St. Tr. 79,\n120 (1678). Accordingly, retrial is barred if a jury is dis-\ncharged before returning a verdict unless the defendant\nconsents or there is a \u201cmanifest necessity\u201d for the dis-\ncharge. Perez, 9 Wheat., at 580; see also King v. Perkins,\n90 Eng. Rep. 1122 (K. B. 1698).\n In Perez, this Court explained that \u201cmanifest necessity\u201d\nis a high bar: \u201c[T]he power ought to be used with the\ngreatest caution, under urgent circumstances, and for very\nplain and obvious causes.\u201d 9 Wheat., at 580. Since Perez,\nthis Court has not relaxed the showing required. See, e.g.,\nWashington, 434 U. S., at 506 (requiring a \u201c \u2018high degree\u2019 \u201d\nof necessity); Downum, 372 U. S., at 736 (\u201cimperious\nnecessity\u201d); see also, e.g., United States v. Coolidge, 25\nF. Cas. 622, 623 (No. 14,858) (CC Mass. 1815) (Story, J.)\n(\u201cextraordinary and striking circumstances\u201d). Before de-\nclaring a mistrial, therefore, a trial judge must weigh\nheavily a \u201cdefendant\u2019s valued right to have his trial com-\npleted by a particular tribunal.\u201d Wade v. Hunter, 336\nU. S. 684, 689 (1949). And in light of the historical abuses\n10 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nagainst which the Double Jeopardy Clause guards, a trial\njudge must tread with special care where a mistrial would\n\u201chelp the prosecution, at a trial in which its case is going\nbadly, by affording it another, more favorable opportunity\nto convict the accused.\u201d Gori v. United States, 367 U. S.\n364, 369 (1961); see Green, 355 U. S., at 188.\n A jury\u2019s genuine inability to reach a verdict constitutes\nmanifest necessity. But in an acquittal-first jurisdiction, a\njury that advances to the consideration of a lesser included\noffense has not demonstrated an inability to decide a de-\nfendant\u2019s guilt or innocence on a greater\u2014it has acquit-\nted on the greater. Under Green, that is unquestionably\ntrue if the jury convicts on the lesser. See id., at 189. It\nwould be anomalous if the Double Jeopardy Clause offered\nless protection to a defendant whose jury has deadlocked\non the lesser and thus convicted of nothing at all. See\nStone, 31 Cal. 3d, at 511\u2013512, n. 5, 646 P. 2d, at 815, n. 5.\n I would therefore hold that the Double Jeopardy Clause\nrequires a trial judge, in an acquittal-first jurisdiction, to\nhonor a defendant\u2019s request for a partial verdict before\ndeclaring a mistrial on the ground of jury deadlock.\nCourts in acquittal-first jurisdictions have so held. See,\ne.g., Tate, 256 Conn., at 285\u2013287, 773 A. 2d, at 324\u2013325;\nWhiteaker v. State, 808 P. 2d 270, 274 (Alaska App. 1991);\nStone, 31 Cal. 3d, at 519, 646 P. 2d, at 820; State v.\nPugliese, 120 N. H. 728, 730, 422 A. 2d 1319, 1321 (1980)\n(per curiam); State v. Castrillo, 90 N. M. 608, 611, 566\nP. 2d 1146, 1149 (1977); see also N. Y. Crim. Proc. Law\nAnn. \u00a7310.70 (West 2002). Requiring a partial verdict in\nan acquittal-first jurisdiction ensures that the jurisdiction\ntakes the bitter with the sweet. In general, an acquittal-\nfirst instruction increases the likelihood of conviction on a\ngreater offense. See People v. Boettcher, 69 N. Y. 2d 174,\n182, 505 N. E. 2d 594, 597 (1987). True, such an instruc-\ntion may also result in deadlock on a greater, preventing a\nState \u201cfrom obtaining a conviction on the lesser charge\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 11\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nthat would otherwise have been forthcoming and thus\nrequire the expense of a retrial.\u201d Tsanas, 572 F. 2d, at\n346. But a State willing to incur that expense loses noth-\ning by overcharging in an acquittal-first regime. At worst,\nthe State enjoys a second opportunity to convict, \u201cwith the\npossibility that the earlier \u2018trial run\u2019 will strengthen the\nprosecution\u2019s case.\u201d Crist, 437 U. S., at 52 (Powell, J.,\ndissenting). If a State wants the benefits of requiring a\njury to acquit before compromising, it should not be per-\nmitted to deprive a defendant of the corresponding bene-\nfits of having been acquitted. The Double Jeopardy Clause\nexpressly prohibits that outcome.\n The majority observes that we \u201chave never required a\ntrial court, before declaring a mistrial because of a hung\njury, to consider any particular means of breaking the\nimpasse\u2014let alone to consider giving the jury new options\nfor a verdict.\u201d Ante, at 10 (citing Renico v. Lett, 559 U. S.\n___, ___ (2010) (slip op., at 8)). That hands-off approach\ndilutes Perez beyond recognition. This Court has never\nexcused a trial judge from exercising \u201cscrupulous\u201d care\nbefore discharging a jury. Jorn, 400 U. S., at 485 (plural-\nity opinion). Rather, we have insisted that a trial judge\nmay not act \u201cirrationally,\u201d \u201cirresponsibly,\u201d or \u201cprecipi-\ntately.\u201d Washington, 434 U. S., at 514\u2013515. Nor have we\nretreated from the rule that \u201creviewing courts have an\nobligation to ensure themselves that . . . the trial judge\nexercised \u2018sound discretion\u2019 in declaring a mistrial.\u201d Id., at\n514 (quoting Perez, 9 Wheat., at 580).4\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 4 The majority\u2019s reliance on Renico, a habeas corpus case decided\nunder the deferential standard of review prescribed by the Antiterror-\nism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), is perplexing.\nAs Renico made clear, the question there was \u201cnot whether the trial\njudge should have declared a mistrial. It is not even whether it was an\nabuse of discretion for her to have done so\u2014the applicable standard on\ndirect review. The question under AEDPA is instead whether the\ndetermination of the Michigan Supreme Court that there was no abuse\n12 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\n B\n Even if the Double Jeopardy Clause did not compel that\nbroader rule, the facts of this case confirm that there was\nno necessity, let alone manifest necessity, for a mistrial.\nThere was no reason for the judge not to have asked the\njury, prior to discharge, whether it remained \u201cunanimous\nagainst\u201d conviction on capital and first-degree murder.\nThere would have been no intrusion on the jury\u2019s delibera-\ntive process. The judge was not required to issue new\ninstructions or verdict forms, allow new arguments, direct\nfurther deliberations, or take any other action that might\nhave threatened to coerce the jury. Merely repeating his\nearlier question would have sufficed. Because the judge\nfailed to take even this modest step\u2014or indeed, to explore\nany alternatives to a mistrial, or even to make an on-the-\nrecord finding of manifest necessity\u2014I conclude that there\nwas an abuse of discretion. See, e.g., id., at 486; see also\nWashington, 434 U. S., at 525 (Marshall, J., dissenting)\n(manifest necessity requires showing \u201cthat there were no\nmeaningful and practical alternatives to a mistrial, or\nthat the trial court scrupulously considered available alter-\nnatives and found all wanting but a termination of the\nproceedings\u201d).\n Indeed, the only reason I can divine for the judge\u2019s\nfailure to take this modest step is his misperception of\nArkansas law with respect to the transitional instruction.\nAfter the colloquy with the forewoman, the judge com-\nmented at sidebar that the jurors \u201chaven\u2019t even taken a\nvote on [negligent homicide]. . . . I don\u2019t think they\u2019ve\ncompleted their deliberation. . . . I mean, under any rea-\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\nof discretion was \u2018an unreasonable application of . . . clearly established\nFederal law.\u2019 \u201d 559 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 5) (quoting 28 U. S. C.\n\u00a72254(d)(1)); accord, 559 U. S., at ___, n. 3 (slip op., at 11, n. 3). Renico\nthus has little to say about a trial judge\u2019s responsibilities, or this\nCourt\u2019s, on direct review. Cf. Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U. S. ___, ___\n(2011) (slip op., at 30\u201331).\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 13\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nsonable circumstances, they would at least take a vote\non negligent homicide.\u201d App. 65\u201366. And after the jury\nretired for the last half-hour of deliberations, the judge\nsaid, \u201cI don\u2019t think they have an understanding of really\nthat they don\u2019t have to get past every charge unanimously\nbefore they can move to the next charge.\u201d Id., at 69. That\nmisstated Arkansas law as well as the judge\u2019s own in-\nstructions. The jury was required to reach a unanimous\ndecision on a greater offense before considering a lesser.\nSee supra, at 2\u20133. In discharging the jury, the judge said,\n\u201cMadam Foreman, there seems to be a lot of confusion on\nthe part . . . of the jury about some of the instructions.\nAnd because of the confusion and because of the timeliness\nand the amount of hours that has gone by without being\nable to reach a verdict, the Court is going to declare a\nmistrial.\u201d App. 69\u201370.\n If, as these comments suggest, the judge wrongly be-\nlieved that the jury was not required to reach unanimity\non a greater offense before considering a lesser, then he\naccorded insufficient finality and weight to the forewom-\nan\u2019s earlier announcement of acquittal on capital and first-\ndegree murder. That mistake of law negates the deference\ndue the judge\u2019s decision to declare a mistrial. The judge\nexplained that the jury was being discharged in part based\non its \u201cconfusion\u201d with respect to the instructions, when in\nfact, the confusion was the judge\u2019s. Ibid.; see, e.g., Wash-\nington, 434 U. S., at 510, n. 28 (\u201cIf the record reveals that\nthe trial judge has failed to exercise the \u2018sound discretion\u2019\nentrusted to him, the reason for . . . deference by an appel-\nlate court disappears\u201d); Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U. S.\n458, 469 (1973) (critiquing \u201cerratic\u201d mistrial inquiry); Gori,\n367 U. S., at 371, n. 3 (Douglas, J., dissenting) (noting that\n\u201c[i]n state cases, a second prosecution has been barred\nwhere the jury was discharged through the trial judge\u2019s\nmisconstruction of the law,\u201d and collecting cases). And a\ntrial court \u201cby definition abuses its discretion when it\n14 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nmakes an error of law.\u201d Koon v. United States, 518 U. S.\n81, 100 (1996).\n * * *\n At its core, the Double Jeopardy Clause reflects the\nwisdom of the founding generation, familiar to \u201c \u2018every\nperson acquainted with the history of governments,\u2019 \u201d that\n\u201c \u2018state trials have been employed as a formidable engine\nin the hands of a dominant administration. . . . To prevent\nthis mischief the ancient common law . . . provided that\none acquittal or conviction should satisfy the law.\u2019 \u201d Ex\nparte Lange, 18 Wall. 163, 171 (1874) (quoting Common-\nwealth v. Olds, 15 Ky. 137, 139 (1824)). The Double Jeop-\nardy Clause was enacted \u201c \u2018[t]o perpetuate this wise rule,\nso favorable and necessary to the liberty of the citizen\nin a government like ours.\u2019 \u201d 18 Wall., at 171. This case\ndemonstrates that the threat to individual freedom from\nreprosecutions that favor States and unfairly rescue them\nfrom weak cases has not waned with time. Only this\nCourt\u2019s vigilance has.\n I respectfully dissent.\n",
"html_with_citations": "<pre class=\"inline\">(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1\n\n Syllabus\n\n NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is\n being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.\n The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been\n prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.\n See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337.\n\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n\n Syllabus\n\n BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS\n\n No. 10\u20131320. Argued February 22, 2012\u2014Decided May 24, 2012\nThe State of Arkansas charged petitioner Alex Blueford with capital\n murder for the death of a one-year-old child. That charge included\n the lesser offenses of first-degree murder, manslaughter, and negli-\n gent homicide. Before the start of deliberations, the trial court in-\n structed the jury to consider the offenses as follows: \u201cIf you have a\n reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge of capital\n murder, you will consider the charge of murder in the first degree. . . .\n If you have a reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge\n of murder in the first degree, you will then consider the charge of\n manslaughter. . . . If you have a reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s\n guilt on the charge of manslaughter, you will then consider the\n charge of negligent homicide.\u201d The court also presented the jury with\n a set of verdict forms, which allowed the jury either to convict\n Blueford of one of the charged offenses, or to acquit him of all of\n them. Acquitting on some but not others was not an option.\n After deliberating for a few hours, the jury reported that it could\n not reach a verdict. The court inquired about the jury\u2019s progress on\n each offense. The foreperson disclosed that the jury was unanimous\n against guilt on the charges of capital murder and first-degree mur-\n der, was deadlocked on manslaughter, and had not voted on negli-\n gent homicide. The court told the jury to continue to deliberate. The\n jury did so but still could not reach a verdict, and the court declared a\n mistrial. When the State subsequently sought to retry Blueford, he\n moved to dismiss the capital and first-degree murder charges on dou-\n ble jeopardy grounds. The trial court denied the motion, and the Su-\n preme Court of Arkansas affirmed on interlocutory appeal.\nHeld: The Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar retrying Blueford on\n charges of capital murder and first-degree murder. Pp. 5\u221210.\n (a) The jury did not acquit Blueford of capital or first-degree mur-\n2 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Syllabus\n\n der. Blueford contends that the foreperson\u2019s report that the jury was\n unanimous against guilt on the murder offenses represented a reso-\n lution of some or all of the elements of those offenses in his favor.\n But the report was not a final resolution of anything. When the fore-\n person told the court how the jury had voted on each offense, the jury\u2019s\n deliberations had not yet concluded. The jurors in fact went back to\n the jury room to deliberate further, and nothing in the court\u2019s in-\n structions prohibited them from reconsidering their votes on capital\n and first-degree murder as deliberations continued. The foreperson\u2019s\n report prior to the end of deliberations therefore lacked the finality\n necessary to amount to an acquittal on those offenses. That same\n lack of finality undermines Blueford\u2019s reliance on Green v. United\n States, 355 U. S. 184, and Price v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323. In both of\n those cases, the verdict of the jury was a final decision; here, the re-\n port of the foreperson was not. Pp. 5\u22128.\n (b) The trial court\u2019s declaration of a mistrial was not improper. A\n trial can be discontinued without barring a subsequent one for the\n same offense when \u201cparticular circumstances manifest a necessity\u201d to\n declare a mistrial. Wade v. Hunter, 336 U. S. 684, 690. Blueford con-\n tends that there was no necessity for a mistrial on capital and first-\n degree murder, given the foreperson\u2019s report that the jury had voted\n unanimously against guilt on those charges. According to Blueford,\n the court at that time should have taken some action, whether\n through new partial verdict forms or other means, to allow the jury to\n give effect to those votes, and then considered a mistrial only as to\n the remaining charges. Blueford acknowledges, however, that the\n trial court\u2019s reason for declaring a mistrial here\u2014that the jury was\n unable to reach a verdict\u2014has long been considered the \u201cclassic ba-\n sis\u201d establishing necessity for doing so. Arizona v. Washington, 434\n U. S. 497, 509. And this Court has never required a trial court, be-\n fore declaring a mistrial because of a hung jury, to consider any par-\n ticular means of breaking the impasse\u2015let alone to consider giving\n the jury new options for a verdict. See Renico v. Lett, 559 U. S. ___,\n ___. As permitted under Arkansas law, the jury\u2019s options in this case\n were limited to two: either convict on one of the offenses, or acquit on\n all. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to add an-\n other option\u2014that of acquitting on some offenses but not others.\n Pp. 9\u221210.\n</pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">2011</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ark.</span> <span class=\"page\">8</span></span><pre class=\"inline\">, ___ S. W. 3d ___, affirmed.\n\n ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SCALIA,\nKENNEDY, THOMAS, BREYER, and ALITO, JJ., joined. SOTOMAYOR, J.,\nfiled a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and KAGAN, JJ., joined.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 1\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the\n preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to\n notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-\n ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order\n that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.\n\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n _________________\n\n No. 10\u20131320\n _________________\n\n\n ALEX BLUEFORD, PETITIONER v. ARKANSAS\n ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF\n\n ARKANSAS\n\n [May 24, 2012] \n\n\n CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the\nCourt.\n The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against being\ntried twice for the same offense. The Clause does not,\nhowever, bar a second trial if the first ended in a mistrial.\nBefore the jury concluded deliberations in this case, it re-\nported that it was unanimous against guilt on charges of\ncapital murder and first-degree murder, was deadlocked\non manslaughter, and had not voted on negligent homi-\ncide. The court told the jury to continue to deliberate.\nThe jury did so but still could not reach a verdict, and the\ncourt declared a mistrial. All agree that the defendant\nmay be retried on charges of manslaughter and negligent\nhomicide. The question is whether he may also be retried\non charges of capital and first-degree murder.\n I\n One-year-old Matthew McFadden, Jr., suffered a severe\nhead injury on November 28, 2007, while home with his\nmother\u2019s boyfriend, Alex Blueford. Despite treatment at a\nhospital, McFadden died a few days later.\n The State of Arkansas charged Blueford with capital\nmurder, but waived the death penalty. The State\u2019s theory\n2 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\nat trial was that Blueford had injured McFadden inten-\ntionally, causing the boy\u2019s death \u201c[u]nder circumstances\nmanifesting extreme indifference to the value of human\nlife.\u201d Ark. Code Ann. \u00a75\u201310\u2013101(a)(9)(A) (Supp. 2011).\nThe defense, in contrast, portrayed the death as the re-\nsult of Blueford accidentally knocking McFadden onto the\nground.\n The trial court instructed the jury that the charge of\ncapital murder included three lesser offenses: first-degree\nmurder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide. In addi-\ntion to describing these offenses, the court addressed the\norder in which the jury was to consider them: \u201cIf you have\na reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge\nof capital murder, you will consider the charge of murder\nin the first degree. . . . If you have a reasonable doubt of\nthe defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge of murder in the first\ndegree, you will then consider the charge of manslaugh-\nter. . . . If you have a reasonable doubt of the defendant\u2019s\nguilt on the charge of manslaughter, you will then con-\nsider the charge of negligent homicide.\u201d App. 51\u201352.\n The prosecution commented on these instructions in its\nclosing argument. It told the jury, for example, that \u201cbe-\nfore you can consider a lesser included of capital murder,\nyou must first, all 12, vote that this man is not guilty of\ncapital murder.\u201d Id., at 55. The prosecution explained\nthat this was \u201cnot a situation where you just lay every-\nthing out here and say, well, we have four choices. Which\none does it fit the most?\u201d Id., at 59. Rather, the prose-\ncution emphasized, \u201cunless all 12 of you agree that this\nman\u2019s actions were not consistent with capital murder,\nthen and only then would you go down to murder in the\nfirst degree.\u201d Ibid.\n After the parties concluded their arguments, the court\npresented the jury with a set of five verdict forms, each\nrepresenting a possible verdict. There were four separate\nforms allowing the jury to convict on each of the charged\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 3\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\noffenses: capital murder, first-degree murder, manslaugh-\nter, and negligent homicide. A fifth form allowed the jury\nto return a verdict of acquittal, if the jury found Blueford\nnot guilty of any offense. There was no form allowing the\njury to acquit on some offenses but not others. As stated\nin the court\u2019s instructions, the jury could either \u201cfind the\ndefendant guilty of one of these offenses\u201d or \u201cacquit him\noutright.\u201d Id., at 51. Any verdict\u2014whether to convict on\none or to acquit on all\u2014had to be unanimous.\n A few hours after beginning its deliberations, the jury\nsent the court a note asking \u201cwhat happens if we cannot\nagree on a charge at all.\u201d Id., at 62. The court called the\njury back into the courtroom and issued a so-called \u201cAllen\ninstruction,\u201d emphasizing the importance of reaching a ver-\ndict. See Allen v. United States, 164 U. S. 492, 501\u2013502\n(1896). The jury then deliberated for a half hour more\nbefore sending out a second note, stating that it \u201ccannot\nagree on any one charge in this case.\u201d App. 64. When the\ncourt summoned the jury again, the jury foreperson re-\nported that the jury was \u201chopelessly\u201d deadlocked. Ibid.\nThe court asked the foreperson to disclose the jury\u2019s votes\non each offense:\n \u201cTHE COURT: All right. If you have your numbers\n together, and I don\u2019t want names, but if you have your\n numbers I would like to know what your count was on\n capital murder.\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: That was unanimous\n against that. No.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Okay, on murder in the first degree?\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: That was unanimous\n against that.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Okay. Manslaughter?\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: Nine for, three against.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Okay. And negligent homicide?\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: We did not vote on that,\n4 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n sir.\n \u201cTHE COURT: Did not vote on that.\n \u201cJUROR NUMBER ONE: No, sir. We couldn\u2019t get\n past the manslaughter. Were we supposed to go past\n that? I thought we were supposed to go one at a\n time.\u201d Id., at 64\u201365.\n Following this exchange, the court gave another Allen\ninstruction and sent the jurors back to the jury room.\nAfter deliberations resumed, Blueford\u2019s counsel asked the\ncourt to submit new verdict forms to the jurors, to be\ncompleted \u201cfor those counts that they have reached a\nverdict on.\u201d Id., at 67. The prosecution objected on the\ngrounds that the jury was \u201cstill deliberating\u201d and that a\nverdict of acquittal had to be \u201call or nothing.\u201d Id., at 68.\nThe court denied Blueford\u2019s request. To allow for a partial\nverdict, the court explained, would be \u201clike changing\nhorses in the middle of the stream,\u201d given that the jury\nhad already received instructions and verdict forms. Ibid.\nThe court informed counsel that it would declare a mis-\ntrial \u201cif the jury doesn\u2019t make a decision.\u201d Id., at 69.\n When the jury returned a half hour later, the foreperson\nstated that they had not reached a verdict. The court\ndeclared a mistrial and discharged the jury.\n The State subsequently sought to retry Blueford. He\nmoved to dismiss the capital and first-degree murder\ncharges on double jeopardy grounds, citing the foreper-\nson\u2019s report that the jurors had voted unanimously against\nguilt on those offenses. The trial court denied the motion,\nand the Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed on interlocu-\ntory appeal. According to the State Supreme Court, the\nforeperson\u2019s report had no effect on the State\u2019s ability to\nretry Blueford, because the foreperson \u201cwas not making a\nformal announcement of acquittal\u201d when she disclosed the\njury\u2019s votes. </pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">2011</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ark.</span> <span class=\"page\">8</span></span><pre class=\"inline\">, p. 9, ___ S. W. 3d ___, ___. This\nwas not a case, the court observed, \u201cwhere a formal verdict\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 5\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\nwas announced or entered of record.\u201d Ibid. The court\nadded that the trial court did not err in denying Blueford\u2019s\nrequest for new verdict forms that would have allowed the\njury to render a partial verdict on the charges of capital\nand first-degree murder.\n Blueford sought review in this Court, and we granted\ncertiorari. 565 U. S. ___ (2011).\n II\n The Double Jeopardy Clause provides that no person\nshall \u201cbe subject for the same offence to be twice put in\njeopardy of life or limb.\u201d U. S. Const., Amdt. 5. The\nClause \u201cguarantees that the State shall not be permitted\nto make repeated attempts to convict the accused, thereby\nsubjecting him to embarrassment, expense and ordeal and\ncompelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and\ninsecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even\nthough innocent he may be found guilty.\u201d United States v.\nMartin Linen Supply Co., 430 U. S. 564, 569 (1977) (inter-\nnal quotation marks omitted).\n Blueford contends that the foreperson\u2019s report means\nthat he cannot be tried again on charges of capital and\nfirst-degree murder. According to Blueford, the Double\nJeopardy Clause prohibits a second trial on those charges,\nfor two reasons.\n A\n Blueford\u2019s primary submission is that he cannot be\nretried for capital and first-degree murder because the\njury actually acquitted him of those offenses. See Green v.\nUnited States, 355 U. S. 184, 188 (1957). The Arkansas\nSupreme Court noted\u2014and Blueford acknowledges\u2014that\nno formal judgment of acquittal was entered in his case.\nBut none was necessary, Blueford maintains, because an\nacquittal is a matter of substance, not form. Quoting from\nour decision in Martin Linen, supra, at 571, Blueford\n6 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\ncontends that despite the absence of a formal verdict, a\njury\u2019s announcement constitutes an acquittal if it \u201c \u2018actu-\nally represents a resolution . . . of some or all of the factual\nelements of the offense charged.\u2019 \u201d Brief for Petitioner 21.\nHere, according to Blueford, the foreperson\u2019s announce-\nment of the jury\u2019s unanimous votes on capital and first-\ndegree murder represented just that: a resolution of some\nor all of the elements of those offenses in Blueford\u2019s favor.\n We disagree. The foreperson\u2019s report was not a final\nresolution of anything. When the foreperson told the court\nhow the jury had voted on each offense, the jury\u2019s deliber-\nations had not yet concluded. The jurors in fact went back\nto the jury room to deliberate further, even after the fore-\nperson had delivered her report. When they emerged a\nhalf hour later, the foreperson stated only that they were\nunable to reach a verdict. She gave no indication whether\nit was still the case that all 12 jurors believed Blueford\nwas not guilty of capital or first-degree murder, that 9 of\nthem believed he was guilty of manslaughter, or that a\nvote had not been taken on negligent homicide. The fact\nthat deliberations continued after the report deprives that\nreport of the finality necessary to constitute an acquittal\non the murder offenses.\n Blueford maintains, however, that any possibility that\nthe jurors revisited the murder offenses was foreclosed by\nthe instructions given to the jury. Those instructions, he\ncontends, not only required the jury to consider the of-\nfenses in order, from greater to lesser, but also prevented\nit from transitioning from one offense to the next with-\nout unanimously\u2014and definitively\u2014resolving the greater\noffense in his favor. \u201cA jury is presumed to follow its\ninstructions.\u201d Weeks v. Angelone, 528 U. S. 225, 234\n(2000). So, Blueford says, the foreperson\u2019s report that the\njury was deadlocked on manslaughter necessarily estab-\nlishes that the jury had acquitted Blueford of the greater\noffenses of capital and first-degree murder.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 7\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n But even if we assume that the instructions required a\nunanimous vote before the jury could consider a lesser\noffense\u2014as the State assumes for purposes of this case,\nsee Brief for Respondent 25, n. 3\u2014nothing in the instruc-\ntions prohibited the jury from reconsidering such a vote.\nThe instructions said simply, \u201cIf you have a reasonable\ndoubt of the defendant\u2019s guilt on the charge of [the greater\noffense], you will [then] consider the charge of [the lesser\noffense].\u201d App. 51\u201352. The jurors were never told that\nonce they had a reasonable doubt, they could not rethink\nthe issue. The jury was free to reconsider a greater of-\nfense, even after considering a lesser one.1\n A simple example illustrates the point. A jury enters\nthe jury room, having just been given these instructions.\nThe foreperson decides that it would make sense to deter-\nmine the extent of the jurors\u2019 agreement before discus-\nsions begin. Accordingly, she conducts a vote on capital\nmurder, and everyone votes against guilt. She does the\nsame for first-degree murder, and again, everyone votes\nagainst guilt. She then calls for a vote on manslaughter,\nand there is disagreement. Only then do the jurors en-\ngage in a discussion about the circumstances of the crime.\nWhile considering the arguments of the other jurors on\nhow the death was caused, one of the jurors starts rethink-\ning his own stance on a greater offense. After reflecting on\nthe evidence, he comes to believe that the defendant did\nknowingly cause the death\u2014satisfying the definition of\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 1 In reaching a contrary conclusion, post, at 6 (opinion of SOTOMAYOR,\n\nJ.), the dissent construes the jury instructions to \u201crequire a jury to\ncomplete its deliberations on a greater offense before it may consider a\nlesser,\u201d post, at 3 (emphasis added). But no such requirement can be\nfound in the text of the instructions themselves. And the dissent\u2019s\nattempt to glean such a requirement from the Arkansas Supreme\nCourt\u2019s decision in Hughes v. State, </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/ark/91cW/hughes-v-state/\"><span class=\"volume\">347</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ark.</span> <span class=\"page\">696</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 66 S. W. 3d 645\n(2002), is unavailing, for that decision nowhere addresses the issue\nhere\u2014whether a jury can reconsider a greater offense after considering\na lesser one.\n8 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\nfirst-degree murder. At that point, nothing in the instruc-\ntions prohibits the jury from doing what juries often do:\nrevisit a prior vote. \u201cThe very object of the jury system,\u201d\nafter all, \u201cis to secure unanimity by a comparison of views,\nand by arguments among the jurors themselves.\u201d Allen,\n164 U. S., at 501. A single juror\u2019s change of mind is all it\ntakes to require the jury to reconsider a greater offense.\n It was therefore possible for Blueford\u2019s jury to revisit the\noffenses of capital and first-degree murder, notwithstand-\ning its earlier votes. And because of that possibility, the\nforeperson\u2019s report prior to the end of deliberations lacked\nthe finality necessary to amount to an acquittal on those\noffenses, quite apart from any requirement that a formal\nverdict be returned or judgment entered.\n That same lack of finality undermines Blueford\u2019s reli-\nance on Green v. United States, 355 U. S. 184 (1957), and\nPrice v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323 (1970). In those cases, we\nheld that the Double Jeopardy Clause is violated when\na defendant, tried for a greater offense and convicted of\na lesser included offense, is later retried for the greater\noffense. See Green, supra, at 190; Price, supra, at 329.\nBlueford argues that the only fact distinguishing his case\nfrom Green and Price is that his case involves a deadlock\non the lesser included offense, as opposed to a conviction.\nIn his view, that distinction only favors him, because the\nDouble Jeopardy Clause should, if anything, afford greater\nprotection to a defendant who is not found guilty of the\nlesser included offense.\n Blueford\u2019s argument assumes, however, that the votes\nreported by the foreperson did not change, even though\nthe jury deliberated further after that report. That as-\nsumption is unjustified, because the reported votes were,\nfor the reasons noted, not final. Blueford thus overlooks\nthe real distinction between the cases: In Green and Price,\nthe verdict of the jury was a final decision; here, the report\nof the foreperson was not.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 9\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\n B\n Blueford maintains that even if the jury did not acquit\nhim of capital and first-degree murder, a second trial on\nthose offenses would nonetheless violate the Double Jeop-\nardy Clause, because the trial court\u2019s declaration of a\nmistrial was improper. Blueford acknowledges that a trial\ncan be discontinued without barring a subsequent one for\nthe same offense when \u201cparticular circumstances manifest\na necessity\u201d to declare a mistrial. Wade v. Hunter, 336\nU. S. 684, 690 (1949); see also United States v. Perez, </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/scotus/rp7/united-states-v-perez/\"><span class=\"volume\">9</span>\n<span class=\"reporter\">Wheat.</span> <span class=\"page\">579</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 580 (1824). He also acknowledges that the\ntrial court\u2019s reason for declaring a mistrial here\u2014that\nthe jury was unable to reach a verdict\u2014has long been con-\nsidered the \u201cclassic basis\u201d establishing such a necessity.\nArizona v. Washington, 434 U. S. 497, 509 (1978).\nBlueford therefore accepts that a second trial on man-\nslaughter and negligent homicide would pose no double\njeopardy problem. He contends, however, that there was\nno necessity for a mistrial on capital and first-degree\nmurder, given the foreperson\u2019s report that the jury had\nvoted unanimously against guilt on those charges. Accord-\ning to Blueford, the court at that time should have taken\n\u201csome action,\u201d whether through partial verdict forms or\nother means, to allow the jury to give effect to those votes,\nand then considered a mistrial only as to the remaining\ncharges. Reply Brief for Petitioner 11, n. 8.\n We reject that suggestion. We have never required a\ntrial court, before declaring a mistrial because of a hung\njury, to consider any particular means of breaking the\nimpasse\u2014let alone to consider giving the jury new options\nfor a verdict. See Renico v. Lett, 559 U. S. ___, ___ (2010)\n(slip op., at 8).2 As permitted under Arkansas law, the\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 2 Finding our reliance on Renico \u201cperplexing,\u201d the dissent reads that\n\ndecision to have \u201clittle to say about a trial judge\u2019s responsibilities, or\nthis Court\u2019s, on direct review.\u201d Post, at 10\u201311, n. 4. But Renico\u2019s\n10 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n Opinion of the Court\n\njury\u2019s options in this case were limited to two: either con-\nvict on one of the offenses, or acquit on all. The instruc-\ntions explained those options in plain terms, and the\nverdict forms likewise contemplated no other outcome.\nThere were separate forms to convict on each of the possi-\nble offenses, but there was only one form to acquit, and it\nwas to acquit on all of them. When the foreperson dis-\nclosed the jury\u2019s votes on capital and first-degree murder,\nthe trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to\nadd another option\u2014that of acquitting on some offenses\nbut not others. That, however, is precisely the relief\nBlueford seeks\u2014relief the Double Jeopardy Clause does\nnot afford him.\n * * *\n The jury in this case did not convict Blueford of any\noffense, but it did not acquit him of any either. When the\njury was unable to return a verdict, the trial court prop-\nerly declared a mistrial and discharged the jury. As a\nconsequence, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not stand\nin the way of a second trial on the same offenses.\n The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arkansas is\n\n Affirmed.\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014 \n\ndiscussion of the applicable legal principles concerns just that, and the \n\ndissent in any event does not dispute that we have never required a \n\ntrial court to consider any particular means of breaking a jury impasse.\n\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 1\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES\n _________________\n\n No. 10\u20131320\n _________________\n\n\n ALEX BLUEFORD, PETITIONER v. ARKANSAS\n ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF\n\n ARKANSAS\n\n [May 24, 2012] \n\n\n JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG\nand JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting.\n The Double Jeopardy Clause \u201cunequivocally prohibits a\nsecond trial following an acquittal.\u201d Arizona v. Washing-\nton, 434 U. S. 497, 503 (1978). To implement this rule, our\ncases have articulated two principles. First, an acquittal\noccurs if a jury\u2019s decision, \u201cwhatever its label, actually rep-\nresents a resolution, correct or not, of some or all of the\nfactual elements of the offense charged.\u201d United States v.\nMartin Linen Supply Co., 430 U. S. 564, 571 (1977). Sec-\nond, a trial judge may not defeat a defendant\u2019s entitlement\nto \u201cthe verdict of a tribunal he might believe to be favora-\nbly disposed to his fate\u201d by declaring a mistrial before\ndeliberations end, absent a defendant\u2019s consent or a\n\u201c \u2018manifest necessity\u2019 \u201d to do so. United States v. Jorn, 400\nU. S. 470, 486, 481 (1971) (plurality opinion) (quoting\nUnited States v. Perez, </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/scotus/rp7/united-states-v-perez/\"><span class=\"volume\">9</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Wheat.</span> <span class=\"page\">579</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 580 (1824)).\n Today\u2019s decision misapplies these longstanding prin-\nciples. The Court holds that petitioner Alex Blueford\nwas not acquitted of capital or first-degree murder, even\nthough the forewoman of the Arkansas jury empaneled to\ntry him announced in open court that the jury was \u201cunan-\nimous against\u201d convicting Blueford of those crimes. Nor,\nthe Court concludes, did the Double Jeopardy Clause\noblige the trial judge to take any action to give effect to the\njury\u2019s unambiguous decision before declaring a mistrial as\n2 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nto those offenses. The Court thus grants the State what\nthe Constitution withholds: \u201cthe proverbial \u2018second bite at\nthe apple.\u2019 \u201d Burks v. United States, 437 U. S. 1, 17 (1978).\n I respectfully dissent.\n I\n\n A\n\n The bar on retrials following acquittals is \u201cthe most\nfundamental rule in the history of double jeopardy juris-\nprudence.\u201d Martin Linen, 430 U. S., at 571; see, e.g.,\nUnited States v. Ball, 163 U. S. 662, 671 (1896); 4 W.\nBlackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 329\n(1769). This prohibition stops the State, \u201cwith all its\nresources and power,\u201d from mounting abusive, harassing\nreprosecutions, Green v. United States, 355 U. S. 184, 187\n(1957), which subject a defendant to \u201cembarrassment,\nexpense, anxiety, and insecurity, and the possibility that\nhe may be found guilty even though innocent,\u201d United\nStates v. DiFrancesco, 449 U. S. 117, 136 (1980).\n In ascertaining whether an acquittal has occurred,\n\u201cform is not to be exalted over substance.\u201d Sanabria v.\nUnited States, 437 U. S. 54, 66 (1978). Rather, we ask\nwhether the factfinder has made \u201ca substantive determi-\nnation that the prosecution has failed to carry its burden.\u201d\nSmith v. Massachusetts, 543 U. S. 462, 468 (2005). Ju-\nrisdictions have different procedures respecting the an-\nnouncement of verdicts and the entry of judgments, but\nthat diversity has no constitutional significance. Jeopardy\nterminates upon a determination, however characterized,\nthat the \u201cevidence is insufficient\u201d to prove a defendant\u2019s\n\u201cfactual guilt.\u201d Smalis v. Pennsylvania, 476 U. S. 140, 144\n(1986). Thus, we have treated as acquittals a trial judge\u2019s\ndirected verdict of not guilty, Smith, 543 U. S., at 468; an\nappellate reversal of a conviction for insufficiency of the\nevidence, Burks, 437 U. S., at 10; and, most pertinent\nhere, a jury\u2019s announcement of a not guilty verdict that\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 3\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nwas \u201cnot followed by any judgment,\u201d Ball, 163 U. S., at\n671.\n A straightforward application of that principle suffices\nto decide this case. Arkansas is a classic \u201cacquittal-first\u201d\nor \u201chard-transition\u201d jurisdiction. See generally People v.\nRichardson, 184 P. 3d 755, 764, n. 7 (Colo. 2008). Arkan-\nsas\u2019 model jury instructions require a jury to complete its\ndeliberations on a greater offense before it may consider\na lesser. 1 Ark. Model Jury Instr., Crim., No. 302 (2d\ned. 1994). As a matter of Arkansas law, \u201c[b]efore it may\nconsider any lesser-included offense, the jury must first\ndetermine that the proof is insufficient to convict on the\ngreater offense. Thus, the jury must, in essence, acquit\nthe defendant of the greater offense before considering his\nor her guilt on the lesser-included offense.\u201d Hughes v.\nState, </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/ark/91cW/hughes-v-state/\"><span class=\"volume\">347</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ark.</span> <span class=\"page\">696</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 706\u2013707, 66 S. W. 3d 645, 651 (2002).1\n Here, the trial judge instructed Blueford\u2019s jury to con-\nsider the offenses in order, from the charged offense of\ncapital murder to the lesser included offenses of first-\ndegree murder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide.\nThe judge told the jury to proceed past capital murder only\nupon a unanimous finding of a \u201creasonable doubt\u201d as to\nthat offense\u2014that is, upon an acquittal. See In re Win-\nship, 397 U. S. 358, 363 (1970). The State\u2019s closing argu-\nments repeated this directive: \u201c[B]efore you can consider a\nlesser included of capital murder, you must first, all 12,\nvote that this man is not guilty of capital murder.\u201d App.\n55. And the forewoman\u2019s colloquy with the judge leaves no\ndoubt that the jury understood the instructions to man-\ndate unanimous acquittal on a greater offense as a pre-\nrequisite to consideration of a lesser: The forewoman\n\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 1 The State has taken the same position. See Brief for Appellee in\nBoyd v. State, No. CR 06\u2013973 (Ark.), p. 13 (\u201c[U]nanimity is the essence\nof a jury verdict as it pertains to acquitting a defendant of the charged\noffense and the subsequent consideration of lesser-included offenses\u201d).\n4 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nreported that the jury had not voted on negligent homicide\nbecause the jurors \u201ccouldn\u2019t get past the manslaughter\u201d\ncount on which they were deadlocked. Id., at 65.\n In this context, the forewoman\u2019s announcement in open\ncourt that the jury was \u201cunanimous against\u201d conviction on\ncapital and first-degree murder, id., at 64\u201365, was an\nacquittal for double jeopardy purposes.2 Per Arkansas\nlaw, the jury\u2019s determination of reasonable doubt as to\nthose offenses was an acquittal \u201cin essence.\u201d Hughes, 347\nArk., at 707, 66 S. W. 3d, at 651. By deciding that the\nState \u201chad failed to come forward with sufficient proof,\u201d\nthe jury resolved the charges of capital and first-degree\nmurder adversely to the State. Burks, 437 U. S., at 10.\nThat acquittal cannot be reconsidered without putting\nBlueford twice in jeopardy.\n Green and Price v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323 (1970), bolster\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 2 The jury\u2019s acquittals on the murder counts were unsurprising in\n\nlight of the deficiencies in the State\u2019s case. For example, Dr. Adam\nCraig\u2014the medical examiner who autopsied the victim, Matthew\nMcFadden, Jr., and whose testimony was essential to the State\u2019s theory\nof the crime\u2014was not board certified in anatomical pathology, hav-\ning failed the certification examination five times. Dr. Craig took only\n2 slides of Matthew\u2019s brain, not the 10 to 20 called for by prevail-\ning professional standards. He dismissed Blueford\u2019s explanation for\nMatthew\u2019s death\u2014that Blueford accidentally knocked Matthew to the\nfloor\u2014on the basis of an outdated paper on child head injuries, ac-\nknowledging that he was only \u201cvaguely aware\u201d of a more recent, semi-\nnal paper that supported Blueford\u2019s account. Record 390; see Gold-\nsmith & Plunkett, A Biomechanical Analysis of the Causes of\nTraumatic Brain Injury in Infants and Children, 25 Am. J. Forensic\nMed. & Pathology 89 (2004). Blueford\u2019s expert pathologist, Dr. Robert\nBux, testified that Dr. Craig\u2019s autopsy was inadequate to establish\nwhether Matthew\u2019s death was accidental or intentional. And Blue-\nford\u2019s expert pediatrician, Dr. John Galaznik, testified that the State\u2019s\ntheory\u2014that Blueford slammed Matthew into a mattress on the floor\u2014\nwas \u201cnot a likely cause\u201d of the boy\u2019s injuries when assessed in view of\ncurrent medical literature. Record 766. Even the trial judge observed\nthat the State\u2019s proof was \u201ccircumstantial at best,\u201d and that this was\n\u201cprobably . . . a lesser included offense case.\u201d Id., at 610.\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 5\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nthat conclusion. In Green, the jury convicted the defend-\nant on the lesser included offense of second-degree murder\nwithout returning a verdict on the charged offense of first-\ndegree murder. This Court concluded that this result was\nan \u201cimplicit acquittal\u201d on the greater offense of first-\ndegree murder, barring retrial. 355 U. S., at 190. The\ndefendant \u201cwas forced to run the gantlet once on that\ncharge and the jury refused to convict him. When given\nthe choice between finding him guilty of either first or\nsecond degree murder it chose the latter.\u201d Ibid.; see also\nPrice, 398 U. S., at 329 (\u201c[T]his Court has consistently\nrefused to rule that jeopardy for an offense continues after\nan acquittal, whether that acquittal is express or implied\nby a conviction on a lesser included offense when the\njury was given a full opportunity to return a verdict on\nthe greater charge\u201d (footnote omitted)). Notably, Green\nacknowledged that its finding of an \u201cimplicit acquittal\u201d\nwas an \u201cassumption,\u201d because the jury had made no ex-\npress statement with respect to the greater offense. 355\nU. S., at 190\u2013191.\n Blueford\u2019s position is even stronger because his jury was\nnot silent on the murder counts, but announced that it\nwas \u201cunanimous against\u201d conviction. And the trial judge\nspecifically instructed the jury to consider manslaughter\nonly after acquitting Blueford of the murder counts.\nCourts in several acquittal-first jurisdictions have held\nthat a jury\u2019s deadlock on a lesser included offense justifies\nthe assumption that the jury acquitted on any greater\noffenses. See State v. Tate, </pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">256</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Conn.</span> <span class=\"page\">262</span></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 283\u2013285, 773\nA. 2d. 308, 323\u2013324 (2001); Stone v. Superior Ct. of San\nDiego Cty., </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/cal/85Gy/stone-v-superior-court/\"><span class=\"volume\">31</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Cal. 3d</span> <span class=\"page\">503</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 511\u2013512, n. 5, 646 P. 2d 809,\n815, n. 5 (1982). That assumption is not even necessary\nhere because the jury unmistakably announced acquittal.\n B\n The majority holds that the forewoman\u2019s announcement\n6 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nwas not an acquittal because it \u201cwas not a final resolution\nof anything.\u201d Ante, at 6. In the majority\u2019s view, the jury\nmight have revisited its decisions on the murder counts\nduring the 31 minutes of deliberations that followed the\nforewoman\u2019s announcement. We cannot know whether\nthe jury did so, the majority reasons, because the jury was\ndischarged without confirming that it remained \u201cunani-\nmous against\u201d convicting Blueford of capital and first-\ndegree murder. Ante, at 6\u20138.3\n Putting to one side the lack of record evidence to support\nthis speculation\u2014by far the more plausible inference is\nthat the jurors spent those 31 minutes attempting to\nresolve their deadlock on manslaughter\u2014I do not agree\nthat the jury was free to reconsider its decisions when\nits deliberations resumed. \u201cA verdict of acquittal on the\nissue of guilt or innocence is, of course, absolutely final.\u201d\nBullington v. Missouri, 451 U. S. 430, 445 (1981). The\njury heard instructions and argument that it was required\nunanimously to acquit on capital and first-degree murder\nbefore it could reach manslaughter. And as the forewom-\nan\u2019s colloquy makes plain, the jury followed those instruc-\ntions scrupulously. There is no reason to believe that the\njury\u2019s vote was anything other than a verdict in sub-\nstance\u2014that is, a \u201cfinal collective decision . . . reached\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 3 This Court granted certiorari to decide \u201c[w]hether, if a jury dead-\n\nlocks on a lesser-included offense, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars\nreprosecution of a greater offense after a jury announces that it has\nvoted against guilt on the greater offense.\u201d Pet. for Cert. i. The major-\nity resolves the question presented by determining that the forewoman\u2019s\nannouncements were not final, such that Blueford\u2019s jury did not neces-\nsarily deadlock on the lesser included offense of manslaughter. See\nante, at 8\u20139, n. 2. In light of that determination, I do not read today\u2019s\nopinion to express any view with respect to the requirements of the\nDouble Jeopardy Clause where a jury does deadlock on a lesser in-\ncluded offense. Cf., e.g., State v. Tate, </pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">256</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Conn.</span> <span class=\"page\">262</span></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 284\u2013285, 773\nA. 2d 308, 324\u2013325 (2001); Whiteaker v. State, 808 P. 2d 270, 274\n(Alaska App. 1991).\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 7\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nafter full deliberation, consideration, and compromise\namong the individual jurors.\u201d Harrison v. Gillespie, 640\nF. 3d 888, 906 (CA9 2011) (en banc). And when that deci-\nsion was announced in open court, it became entitled to\nfull double jeopardy protection. See, e.g., Commonwealth\nv. Roth, </pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">437</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Mass.</span> <span class=\"page\">777</span></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 796, 776 N. E. 2d 437, 450\u2013451\n(2002) (declining to give effect to \u201c \u2018 \u201cthe verdict received\nfrom the lips of the foreman in open court\u201d \u2019 \u201d would \u201cele-\nvate form over substance\u201d); Stone, 31 Cal. 3d, at 511, 646\nP. 2d, at 814\u2013815 (\u201c[I]n determining what verdict, if any, a\njury intended to return, the oral declaration of the jurors\nendorsing the result is the true return of the verdict\u201d\n(internal quotation marks omitted)); see also, e.g., Dixon v.\nState, </pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">29</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ark.</span> <span class=\"page\">165</span></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 171 (1874) (technical defect in verdict\n\u201cis of no consequence whatever, for the verdict need not be\nin writing, but may be announced by the foreman of the\njury orally\u201d); State v. Mills, </pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">19</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ark.</span> <span class=\"page\">476</span></span><pre class=\"inline\"> (1858) (\u201cThe ver-\ndict was of no validity until delivered, by the jury, in\nCourt\u201d).\n The majority\u2019s example of a jury that takes a prelimi-\nnary vote on greater offenses, advances to the considera-\ntion of a lesser, and then returns to a greater, is inapposite.\nSee ante, at 7. In the majority\u2019s example, the jury has\nnot announced its vote in open court. Moreover, the\ninstructions in this case did not contemplate that the\njury\u2019s deliberations could take the course that the majority\nimagines. Arkansas\u2019 model instruction requires acquittal\nas a prerequisite to consideration of a lesser offense, and\nthe Double Jeopardy Clause entitles an acquittal to final-\nity. Indeed, the purpose of an acquittal-first instruction is\nto ensure careful and conclusive deliberation on a greater\noffense. See United States v. Tsanas, 572 F. 2d 340, 346\n(CA2 1978) (Friendly, J.) (acquittal-first instruction avoids\n\u201cthe danger that the jury will not adequately discharge its\nduties with respect to the greater offense, and instead will\nmove too quickly to the lesser\u201d). True, Arkansas\u2019 instruc-\n8 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\ntion does not expressly forbid reconsideration, but it does\nnot expressly permit reconsideration either. In any event,\nnothing indicates that the jury\u2019s announced decisions were\ntentative, compromises, or mere steps en route to a final\nverdict, and the Double Jeopardy Clause demands that\nambiguity be resolved in favor of the defendant. See\nDownum v. United States, 372 U. S. 734, 738 (1963).\n The fact that the jury was not given the express option\nof acquitting on individual offenses is irrelevant. See ante,\nat 3, 9. Arkansas law ascribes no significance to the pres-\nence of such options on a verdict form. See Rowland v.\nState, </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/ark/9kXE/rowland-v-state/\"><span class=\"volume\">263</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ark.</span> <span class=\"page\">77</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 85, 562 S. W. 2d 590, 594 (1978) (\u201cThe\njury may prepare and present its own form of verdict\u201d).\nThe lack of a state procedural vehicle for the entry of a\njudgment of acquittal does not prevent the recognition of\nan acquittal for constitutional purposes. See Hudson v.\nLouisiana, 450 U. S. 40, 41, n. 1 (1981).\n Finally, the majority\u2019s distinction of Green and Price is\nunavailing. The majority observes that Green and Price,\nunlike this case, involved final decisions. Ante, at 8. As I\nhave explained, I view the forewoman\u2019s announcements of\nacquittal in this case as similarly final. In any event,\nGreen clarified that the defendant\u2019s \u201cclaim of former jeop-\nardy\u201d was \u201cnot based on his previous conviction for second\ndegree murder but instead on the original jury\u2019s refusal to\nconvict him of first degree murder.\u201d 355 U. S., at 190,\nn. 11; accord, id., at 194, n. 14. That is, the jury\u2019s silence\non the greater offense spoke with sufficient clarity to\njustify the assumption of acquittal and to invoke the Dou-\nble Jeopardy Clause. Id., at 191; see also Price, 398 U. S.,\nat 329. In light of the forewoman\u2019s announcement, this is\nan a fortiori case.\n In short, the Double Jeopardy Clause demands an in-\nquiry into the substance of the jury\u2019s actions. Blueford\u2019s\njury had the option to convict him of capital and first-\ndegree murder, but expressly declined to do so. That\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 9\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nought to be the end of the matter.\n II\n\n A\n\n Even if the majority were correct that the jury might\nhave reconsidered an acquitted count\u2014a doubtful assump-\ntion for the reasons just explained\u2014that would not defeat\nBlueford\u2019s double jeopardy claim. It \u201chas been long estab-\nlished as an integral part of double jeopardy jurispru-\ndence\u201d that \u201ca defendant could be put in jeopardy even in\na prosecution that did not culminate in a conviction or an\nacquittal.\u201d Crist v. Bretz, 437 U. S. 28, 34 (1978). This\nrule evolved in response to the \u201cabhorrent\u201d practice under\nthe Stuart monarchs of terminating prosecutions, and\nthereby evading the bar on retrials, when it appeared that\nthe Crown\u2019s proof might be insufficient. Washington, 434\nU. S., at 507; see, e.g., Ireland\u2019s Case, 7 How. St. Tr. 79,\n120 (1678). Accordingly, retrial is barred if a jury is dis-\ncharged before returning a verdict unless the defendant\nconsents or there is a \u201cmanifest necessity\u201d for the dis-\ncharge. Perez, 9 Wheat., at 580; see also King v. Perkins,\n90 Eng. Rep. 1122 (K. B. 1698).\n In Perez, this Court explained that \u201cmanifest necessity\u201d\nis a high bar: \u201c[T]he power ought to be used with the\ngreatest caution, under urgent circumstances, and for very\nplain and obvious causes.\u201d 9 Wheat., at 580. Since Perez,\nthis Court has not relaxed the showing required. See, e.g.,\nWashington, 434 U. S., at 506 (requiring a \u201c \u2018high degree\u2019 \u201d\nof necessity); Downum, 372 U. S., at 736 (\u201cimperious\nnecessity\u201d); see also, e.g., United States v. Coolidge, </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/minn/amJn/state-v-coolidge/\"><span class=\"volume\">25</span>\n<span class=\"reporter\">F. Cas.</span> <span class=\"page\">622</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 623 (No. 14,858) (CC Mass. 1815) (Story, J.)\n(\u201cextraordinary and striking circumstances\u201d). Before de-\nclaring a mistrial, therefore, a trial judge must weigh\nheavily a \u201cdefendant\u2019s valued right to have his trial com-\npleted by a particular tribunal.\u201d Wade v. Hunter, 336\nU. S. 684, 689 (1949). And in light of the historical abuses\n10 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nagainst which the Double Jeopardy Clause guards, a trial\njudge must tread with special care where a mistrial would\n\u201chelp the prosecution, at a trial in which its case is going\nbadly, by affording it another, more favorable opportunity\nto convict the accused.\u201d Gori v. United States, 367 U. S.\n364, 369 (1961); see Green, 355 U. S., at 188.\n A jury\u2019s genuine inability to reach a verdict constitutes\nmanifest necessity. But in an acquittal-first jurisdiction, a\njury that advances to the consideration of a lesser included\noffense has not demonstrated an inability to decide a de-\nfendant\u2019s guilt or innocence on a greater\u2014it has acquit-\nted on the greater. Under Green, that is unquestionably\ntrue if the jury convicts on the lesser. See id., at 189. It\nwould be anomalous if the Double Jeopardy Clause offered\nless protection to a defendant whose jury has deadlocked\non the lesser and thus convicted of nothing at all. See\nStone, 31 Cal. 3d, at 511\u2013512, n. 5, 646 P. 2d, at 815, n. 5.\n I would therefore hold that the Double Jeopardy Clause\nrequires a trial judge, in an acquittal-first jurisdiction, to\nhonor a defendant\u2019s request for a partial verdict before\ndeclaring a mistrial on the ground of jury deadlock.\nCourts in acquittal-first jurisdictions have so held. See,\ne.g., Tate, 256 Conn., at 285\u2013287, 773 A. 2d, at 324\u2013325;\nWhiteaker v. State, 808 P. 2d 270, 274 (Alaska App. 1991);\nStone, 31 Cal. 3d, at 519, 646 P. 2d, at 820; State v.\nPugliese, 120 N. H. 728, 730, 422 A. 2d 1319, 1321 (1980)\n(per curiam); State v. Castrillo, 90 N. M. 608, 611, 566\nP. 2d 1146, 1149 (1977); see also N. Y. Crim. Proc. Law\nAnn. \u00a7310.70 (West 2002). Requiring a partial verdict in\nan acquittal-first jurisdiction ensures that the jurisdiction\ntakes the bitter with the sweet. In general, an acquittal-\nfirst instruction increases the likelihood of conviction on a\ngreater offense. See People v. Boettcher, 69 N. Y. 2d 174,\n182, 505 N. E. 2d 594, 597 (1987). True, such an instruc-\ntion may also result in deadlock on a greater, preventing a\nState \u201cfrom obtaining a conviction on the lesser charge\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 11\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nthat would otherwise have been forthcoming and thus\nrequire the expense of a retrial.\u201d Tsanas, 572 F. 2d, at\n346. But a State willing to incur that expense loses noth-\ning by overcharging in an acquittal-first regime. At worst,\nthe State enjoys a second opportunity to convict, \u201cwith the\npossibility that the earlier \u2018trial run\u2019 will strengthen the\nprosecution\u2019s case.\u201d Crist, 437 U. S., at 52 (Powell, J.,\ndissenting). If a State wants the benefits of requiring a\njury to acquit before compromising, it should not be per-\nmitted to deprive a defendant of the corresponding bene-\nfits of having been acquitted. The Double Jeopardy Clause\nexpressly prohibits that outcome.\n The majority observes that we \u201chave never required a\ntrial court, before declaring a mistrial because of a hung\njury, to consider any particular means of breaking the\nimpasse\u2014let alone to consider giving the jury new options\nfor a verdict.\u201d Ante, at 10 (citing Renico v. Lett, 559 U. S.\n___, ___ (2010) (slip op., at 8)). That hands-off approach\ndilutes Perez beyond recognition. This Court has never\nexcused a trial judge from exercising \u201cscrupulous\u201d care\nbefore discharging a jury. Jorn, 400 U. S., at 485 (plural-\nity opinion). Rather, we have insisted that a trial judge\nmay not act \u201cirrationally,\u201d \u201cirresponsibly,\u201d or \u201cprecipi-\ntately.\u201d Washington, 434 U. S., at 514\u2013515. Nor have we\nretreated from the rule that \u201creviewing courts have an\nobligation to ensure themselves that . . . the trial judge\nexercised \u2018sound discretion\u2019 in declaring a mistrial.\u201d Id., at\n514 (quoting Perez, 9 Wheat., at 580).4\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\n 4 The majority\u2019s reliance on Renico, a habeas corpus case decided\nunder the deferential standard of review prescribed by the Antiterror-\nism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), is perplexing.\nAs Renico made clear, the question there was \u201cnot whether the trial\njudge should have declared a mistrial. It is not even whether it was an\nabuse of discretion for her to have done so\u2014the applicable standard on\ndirect review. The question under AEDPA is instead whether the\ndetermination of the Michigan Supreme Court that there was no abuse\n12 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\n B\n Even if the Double Jeopardy Clause did not compel that\nbroader rule, the facts of this case confirm that there was\nno necessity, let alone manifest necessity, for a mistrial.\nThere was no reason for the judge not to have asked the\njury, prior to discharge, whether it remained \u201cunanimous\nagainst\u201d conviction on capital and first-degree murder.\nThere would have been no intrusion on the jury\u2019s delibera-\ntive process. The judge was not required to issue new\ninstructions or verdict forms, allow new arguments, direct\nfurther deliberations, or take any other action that might\nhave threatened to coerce the jury. Merely repeating his\nearlier question would have sufficed. Because the judge\nfailed to take even this modest step\u2014or indeed, to explore\nany alternatives to a mistrial, or even to make an on-the-\nrecord finding of manifest necessity\u2014I conclude that there\nwas an abuse of discretion. See, e.g., id., at 486; see also\nWashington, 434 U. S., at 525 (Marshall, J., dissenting)\n(manifest necessity requires showing \u201cthat there were no\nmeaningful and practical alternatives to a mistrial, or\nthat the trial court scrupulously considered available alter-\nnatives and found all wanting but a termination of the\nproceedings\u201d).\n Indeed, the only reason I can divine for the judge\u2019s\nfailure to take this modest step is his misperception of\nArkansas law with respect to the transitional instruction.\nAfter the colloquy with the forewoman, the judge com-\nmented at sidebar that the jurors \u201chaven\u2019t even taken a\nvote on [negligent homicide]. . . . I don\u2019t think they\u2019ve\ncompleted their deliberation. . . . I mean, under any rea-\n\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\nof discretion was \u2018an unreasonable application of . . . clearly established\nFederal law.\u2019 \u201d 559 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 5) (quoting 28 U. S. C.\n\u00a72254(d)(1)); accord, 559 U. S., at ___, n. 3 (slip op., at 11, n. 3). Renico\nthus has little to say about a trial judge\u2019s responsibilities, or this\nCourt\u2019s, on direct review. Cf. Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U. S. ___, ___\n(2011) (slip op., at 30\u201331).\n Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 13\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nsonable circumstances, they would at least take a vote\non negligent homicide.\u201d App. 65\u201366. And after the jury\nretired for the last half-hour of deliberations, the judge\nsaid, \u201cI don\u2019t think they have an understanding of really\nthat they don\u2019t have to get past every charge unanimously\nbefore they can move to the next charge.\u201d Id., at 69. That\nmisstated Arkansas law as well as the judge\u2019s own in-\nstructions. The jury was required to reach a unanimous\ndecision on a greater offense before considering a lesser.\nSee supra, at 2\u20133. In discharging the jury, the judge said,\n\u201cMadam Foreman, there seems to be a lot of confusion on\nthe part . . . of the jury about some of the instructions.\nAnd because of the confusion and because of the timeliness\nand the amount of hours that has gone by without being\nable to reach a verdict, the Court is going to declare a\nmistrial.\u201d App. 69\u201370.\n If, as these comments suggest, the judge wrongly be-\nlieved that the jury was not required to reach unanimity\non a greater offense before considering a lesser, then he\naccorded insufficient finality and weight to the forewom-\nan\u2019s earlier announcement of acquittal on capital and first-\ndegree murder. That mistake of law negates the deference\ndue the judge\u2019s decision to declare a mistrial. The judge\nexplained that the jury was being discharged in part based\non its \u201cconfusion\u201d with respect to the instructions, when in\nfact, the confusion was the judge\u2019s. Ibid.; see, e.g., Wash-\nington, 434 U. S., at 510, n. 28 (\u201cIf the record reveals that\nthe trial judge has failed to exercise the \u2018sound discretion\u2019\nentrusted to him, the reason for . . . deference by an appel-\nlate court disappears\u201d); Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U. S.\n458, 469 (1973) (critiquing \u201cerratic\u201d mistrial inquiry); Gori,\n367 U. S., at 371, n. 3 (Douglas, J., dissenting) (noting that\n\u201c[i]n state cases, a second prosecution has been barred\nwhere the jury was discharged through the trial judge\u2019s\nmisconstruction of the law,\u201d and collecting cases). And a\ntrial court \u201cby definition abuses its discretion when it\n14 BLUEFORD v. ARKANSAS\n\n SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting\n\nmakes an error of law.\u201d Koon v. United States, 518 U. S.\n81, 100 (1996).\n * * *\n At its core, the Double Jeopardy Clause reflects the\nwisdom of the founding generation, familiar to \u201c \u2018every\nperson acquainted with the history of governments,\u2019 \u201d that\n\u201c \u2018state trials have been employed as a formidable engine\nin the hands of a dominant administration. . . . To prevent\nthis mischief the ancient common law . . . provided that\none acquittal or conviction should satisfy the law.\u2019 \u201d Ex\nparte Lange, </pre><span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"/scotus/sp7/ex-parte-lange/\"><span class=\"volume\">18</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Wall.</span> <span class=\"page\">163</span></a></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 171 (1874) (quoting Common-\nwealth v. Olds, </pre><span class=\"citation no-link\"><span class=\"volume\">15</span> <span class=\"reporter\">Ky.</span> <span class=\"page\">137</span></span><pre class=\"inline\">, 139 (1824)). The Double Jeop-\nardy Clause was enacted \u201c \u2018[t]o perpetuate this wise rule,\nso favorable and necessary to the liberty of the citizen\nin a government like ours.\u2019 \u201d 18 Wall., at 171. This case\ndemonstrates that the threat to individual freedom from\nreprosecutions that favor States and unfairly rescue them\nfrom weak cases has not waned with time. Only this\nCourt\u2019s vigilance has.\n I respectfully dissent.\n</pre>",
"sha1": "7709659dadb54a596607bde2080f5bc9176e0f61",
"date_modified": "2014-10-30T14:07:23.200823",
"precedential_status": "Published",
"absolute_url": "/opinion/800858/blueford-v-arkansas/",
"citation_count": 6,
"extracted_by_ocr": false,
"docket": "/api/rest/v2/docket/1998737/",
"html": "",
"resource_uri": "/api/rest/v2/document/800858/"
} |
{"draft":"","doc_id":"RFC0293","title":" Network Host Status ","authors":["E. Westheimer"],"format":["ASCII","HTML"],"page_count":"4","pub_status":"UNKNOWN","status":"UNKNOWN","source":"Legacy","abstract":" ","pub_date":"January 1972","keywords":[" "],"obsoletes":["RFC0288"],"obsoleted_by":[" RFC0298"],"updates":[" RFC0288"],"updated_by":[],"see_also":[],"doi":"10.17487\/RFC0293","errata_url":null} |
{
"id": 2479733,
"type": "Feature",
"properties": {
"name":"Reece",
"placetype":"locality",
"woe:id":2479733,
"woe:name":"Reece, Kansas, United States",
"woe:place_id":"W7FtG8.bBZvNgMpV",
"woe:placetype":"locality",
"woe:placetype_id":7
},
"bbox": [-96.430779,37.808697,-96.403877,37.81385],
"geometry": {"alpha":0.00015,"bbox":[-96.430778503418,37.808696746826,-96.403877258301,37.813850402832],"coordinates":[[[[-96.420479,37.808697],[-96.430779,37.812225],[-96.419273,37.81385],[-96.403877,37.811649],[-96.420479,37.808697]]]],"created":1292456767,"edges":5,"is_donuthole":0,"link":{"href":"http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5090/shapefiles/2479733_20101215_1ef56d6e6c.tar.gz"},"points":10,"type":"MultiPolygon"}
} |
{"Kent": {"Kentwood High School (Washington)": "Kentwood High School is a high school in Covington, Washington. Kentwood is one of four high schools in the Kent School District. It serves students in grades nine through twelve who live in mainly in the east central region of the district."}} |
{
"id": 29399295,
"type": "Feature",
"properties": {
"name":"Stropkov",
"placetype":"county",
"woe:id":29399295,
"woe:name":"Stropkov, Presovsky, Slovakia",
"woe:place_id":"WY9SFLqbCJ.ABr..hQ",
"woe:placetype":"county",
"woe:placetype_id":9
},
"bbox": [21.625385,49.180916,21.660233,49.258507],
"geometry": {"alpha":0.0015,"bbox":[21.625385284424,49.18091583252,21.660232543945,49.258506774902],"coordinates":[[[[21.655769,49.216587],[21.660233,49.181927],[21.660233,49.180916],[21.650791,49.20459],[21.625385,49.258507],[21.655769,49.216587]]]],"created":1239413401,"edges":6,"is_donuthole":0,"link":{"href":"http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3611/shapefiles/29399295_20090411_579cce1c32.tar.gz"},"points":7,"type":"MultiPolygon"}
} |
[
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6M01fTuBhyE/W3D8UapVCYI/AAAAAAADEuA/4TjCouLLVSgBDRywPhTNJKCIXjLG3aRXgCHMYCw/s0/000.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-e6eHES90Z1s/W3D8Uk8lx3I/AAAAAAADEuE/qhJkVuwEs4c19aeK3tNfv-OYskKt-594wCHMYCw/s0/001.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QvVF58WTf7M/W3D8U1_jSuI/AAAAAAADEuI/1iT03SGnlIkNNsUgoKNo7H-S4DpV4C8TgCHMYCw/s0/002.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ogD290pBf44/W3D8VEPIF6I/AAAAAAADEuM/U0Iex9mWWHA19KEzR_0jdab5XFOS4wE8wCHMYCw/s0/003.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XhftiYG1t-I/W3D8VeIgqRI/AAAAAAADEuQ/tXK07tItKnQVR7_RQh-3-2Woe20TYBgNwCHMYCw/s0/004.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZMJWmuZr8I4/W3D8Vq6vgYI/AAAAAAADEuU/oJCGh5ewuFUwDjGV4ivBFF98HOR-8GdJgCHMYCw/s0/005.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ibTie3AbZhw/W3D8V2L6JvI/AAAAAAADEuY/g-bhKgC9GqIp8QiNpo91LCEQMyCg8PQNQCHMYCw/s0/006.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1VVZI5QbZxU/W3D8WemyUhI/AAAAAAADEuc/0nWsUQUaYvEvHFSE9pidoT8gg86JQaapQCHMYCw/s0/007.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BoOHvvfU5H4/W3D8WgaSblI/AAAAAAADEug/36PtDqrdtNo2N_feD-bYGGjrqUS1ACcaACHMYCw/s0/008.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bSHSuEDNmMk/W3D8WwCn4RI/AAAAAAADEuk/WqVT2grWs9crnFYEPnMfYIERQ3Z29IIVACHMYCw/s0/009.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Ob5PmTyy_K8/W3D8XCOqk4I/AAAAAAADEuo/xF3cBbvmZsQj-VljWaYT9pGl4JwClBiSwCHMYCw/s0/010.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XO5Vp49UK0M/W3D8XYFubjI/AAAAAAADEus/VZD3QJrycEEuBQ26SOPbLCRN3hg-EqG6QCHMYCw/s0/011.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-l-p1K68Dtmc/W3D8XthZi_I/AAAAAAADEuw/4FIqzsDvZL4ca5cUynVB4kmATkrEh2c4QCHMYCw/s0/012.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wTtbmVUv234/W3D8X2XrJ7I/AAAAAAADEu0/_GtKvZ5Htlw_JNPanYnZgVCCiTxrK9PSACHMYCw/s0/013.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uk09ljSeJ8M/W3D8Yf9YtYI/AAAAAAADEu4/kBiGHHPKOlQXttElbYxV5tpA0mMisR1KACHMYCw/s0/014.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BulTr65xg1w/W3D8YZe7xWI/AAAAAAADEu8/RgPbkq1DNmoto5r88RRImODP_HBcmNqNQCHMYCw/s0/015.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IwPy-lxkQYo/W3D8R-fB3kI/AAAAAAADEvA/Y8bVOfJEeFsUDSuSvQjeAl0MGnOUqFakACHMYCw/s0/016.png"
] |
{
"appService.defaultWebAppToDeploy": "/subscriptions/b722ef2e-0825-4fab-8157-b53d0da65754/resourceGroups/SE-2015-002/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/ashdashboard",
"appService.deploySubpath": "dist\\my-dashboard"
} |
{"id":"aefefad6-9c01-4ead-88c2-685178a76e89","version_id":"0528e3af-5586-5619-88c0-5e436d566add","version":1,"created_at":"2018-08-14T00:28:27.050Z","modified_at":"2018-08-14T00:28:27.050Z","type":"vessel","body":{"name":"ODEON","mmsi":"244700411","imo":"0","eni":"2332317","callsign":"PB7864","shiptype":"79"}} |
{
"logout": "Logi välja",
"hello": "Tere",
"your_albums": "Sinu albumid",
"Error_getting_album": "Viga albumi laadimisel",
"fb_api_error": "Viga Facebookiga ühendumisel",
"please_login": "Palun logi sisse!",
"invalid_url": "Vigane aadress!"
} |
{
"EggMoves": [
{"Move":"Harden"},
{"Move":"Bide"},
{"Move":"Flail"},
{"Move":"Revenge"},
{"Move":"Pursuit"},
{"Move":"DoubleEdge"},
{"Move":"SeismicToss"},
{"Move":"FocusPunch"},
{"Move":"Megahorn"}
]
} |
{
"project_info": {
"project_number": "192153102151",
"project_id": "bikemapper-834d"
},
"client": [
{
"client_info": {
"mobilesdk_app_id": "1:192153102151:android:e3c84107ab13a6f5",
"android_client_info": {
"package_name": "co.uk.sentinelweb.bikemapper"
}
},
"oauth_client": [],
"api_key": [
{
"current_key": "AIzaSyDQDz5a82BWWsF673kjB6KjLMcdl1h5mNc"
}
],
"services": {
"analytics_service": {
"status": 1
},
"appinvite_service": {
"status": 1,
"other_platform_oauth_client": []
},
"ads_service": {
"status": 1
}
}
}
],
"configuration_version": "1"
} |
{"title":"Vladimir Asmolov - Zvezdnaya seriya (2002) RUS [FLAC]","uid":7495934,"size":556505797,"categoryP":"audio","categoryS":"flac","magnet":"?xt=urn:btih:c49908b5c6ee3425f9415e8f9f6e7e09aab30240&dn=Vladimir+Asmolov+-+Zvezdnaya+seriya+%282002%29+RUS+%5BFLAC%5D&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969","seeders":1,"leechers":0,"uploader":"lonelyb0y","files":-1,"time":1343879460,"description":"Genre: Shanson\nYear: 2002\nCodec: FLAC \nType: Image+CUE\nBitrate: Lossless\nDuration: 01:14:50\n\n01 - Grustnaya neskladushka \n02 - Geysha Sonya \n03 - Osen' jizni \n04 - V stepi \n05 - Vesna \n06 - Reketmeny \n07 - Slavyanskiy bazar \n08 - Prosti menya, lyubov' \n09 - Ey, oglyanis' \n10 - Skaji-spasibo \n11 - Devyatyy val \n12 - Rossiya \n13 - V kotoryy raz \n14 - Olovyannaya dusha \n15 - 42 \n16 - Perepela \n17 - Raspahnis', doha \n18 - Katya-Katerina \n19 - Bessonnica \n20 - Filimon","torrent":{"xt":"urn:btih:c49908b5c6ee3425f9415e8f9f6e7e09aab30240","amp;dn":"Vladimir+Asmolov+-+Zvezdnaya+seriya+%282002%29+RUS+%5BFLAC%5D","amp;tr":["udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80","udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337","udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969","udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969"],"infoHash":"c49908b5c6ee3425f9415e8f9f6e7e09aab30240","infoHashBuffer":{"type":"Buffer","data":[196,153,8,181,198,238,52,37,249,65,94,143,159,110,126,9,170,179,2,64]},"announce":[],"urlList":[]}} |
{"ImmunityType": 3, "ImmunitySource": 11}
|
{
"vorgangId": "56225",
"VORGANG": {
"WAHLPERIODE": "17",
"VORGANGSTYP": "Schriftliche Frage",
"TITEL": "Einstufung der Schlei als \"Bundeswasserstraße\"",
"AKTUELLER_STAND": "Beantwortet",
"SIGNATUR": "",
"GESTA_ORDNUNGSNUMMER": "",
"WICHTIGE_DRUCKSACHE": {
"DRS_HERAUSGEBER": "BT",
"DRS_NUMMER": "17/14837",
"DRS_TYP": "Schriftliche Fragen",
"DRS_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btd/17/148/1714837.pdf"
},
"EU_DOK_NR": "",
"SCHLAGWORT": [
"Bundeswasserstraße",
"Schlei"
],
"ABSTRAKT": "Originaltext der Frage(n): \r\n \r\nBeabsichtigt die Bundesregierung, den Status \"Bundeswasserstraße\" für die Schlei vor dem Hintergrund der Forderungen der Initiative \"Regionale Lebensader in Gefahr! – Zukunft für die Bundeswasserstraße Schlei\" zu belassen, bzw. welche Schlussfolgerungen zieht sie aus diesen Forderungen (bitte begründen)? \r\n \r\nWelche Kosten hat die bisherige Einstufung der Schlei in den vergangenen fünf Jahren verursacht, und mit welchen Kosten rechnet die Bundesregierung ab der Neueinstufung in den Folgejahren?"
},
"VORGANGSABLAUF": {
"VORGANGSPOSITION": {
"ZUORDNUNG": "BT",
"URHEBER": "Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort ",
"FUNDSTELLE": "21.10.2013 - BT-Drucksache 17/14837, Nr. 60, 61",
"FUNDSTELLE_LINK": "http://dipbt.bundestag.de:80/dip21/btd/17/148/1714837.pdf",
"PERSOENLICHER_URHEBER": [
{
"VORNAME": "Sönke",
"NACHNAME": "Rix",
"FUNKTION": "MdB",
"FRAKTION": "SPD",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Frage"
},
{
"VORNAME": "Enak",
"NACHNAME": "Ferlemann",
"FUNKTION": "Parl. Staatssekr.",
"RESSORT": "Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung",
"AKTIVITAETSART": "Antwort"
}
]
}
}
}
|
{"properties": {"unk_19": 0, "ambient": 64, "width": 5, "length": 5, "unk_81": 60, "unk_17": false, "models": [{"type": 10, "values": [97791]}], "occludes_2": false, "id": 92157}, "uniques": [{"plane": 0, "i": 29, "j": 85, "x": 9, "y": 30, "id": 92157, "type": 10, "rotation": 2}, {"plane": 0, "i": 29, "j": 85, "x": 24, "y": 10, "id": 92157, "type": 10, "rotation": 1}]} |
{"title":"YSN-423 Sakuragi Yukion JAV CENSORED","uid":11706434,"size":1447931204,"categoryP":"porn","categoryS":"movie_clips","magnet":"?xt=urn:btih:b3acb18a7a2aaaf059252d47fe3246d8083c8779&dn=YSN-423+Sakuragi+Yukion+JAV+CENSORED&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969","seeders":0,"leechers":3,"uploader":"3xplanet","files":1,"time":1424146464,"description":"YSN-423 Sakuragi Yukion JAV CENSORED\nCover <a href="\nhttp://www.3xplanet.com/view/78416.html" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://www.3xplanet.com/view/78416.html</a>\nScreenshot <a href="\nhttp://www.3xplanet.com/view/78494.html" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://www.3xplanet.com/view/78494.html</a>\nTitle: \nStarring: Sakuragi Yukion\nStudio: NON\n\nTag: JAV, CENSORED, NON, Work alone, squirting, housewife, cum inside, Creampie","torrent":{"xt":"urn:btih:b3acb18a7a2aaaf059252d47fe3246d8083c8779","amp;dn":"YSN-423+Sakuragi+Yukion+JAV+CENSORED","amp;tr":["udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80","udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337","udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969","udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969"],"infoHash":"b3acb18a7a2aaaf059252d47fe3246d8083c8779","infoHashBuffer":{"type":"Buffer","data":[179,172,177,138,122,42,170,240,89,37,45,71,254,50,70,216,8,60,135,121]},"announce":[],"urlList":[]}} |
{
"head" : {
"vars" : [ "statement", "item", "name_es", "name_en", "party", "party_name_es", "party_name_en", "district", "district_name_es", "district_name_en", "role", "role_es", "role_en", "start", "end", "facebook", "role_superclass", "role_superclass_es", "role_superclass_en", "org", "org_es", "org_en", "org_jurisdiction" ]
},
"results" : {
"bindings" : [ {
"party" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q16985955"
},
"party_name_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Independiente"
},
"party_name_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Independiente"
},
"item" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q28367149"
},
"district" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1489"
},
"district_name_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Mexico City"
},
"district_name_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Ciudad de México"
},
"role" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2962015"
},
"role_superclass" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2962015"
},
"role_superclass_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Head of Mexico City government"
},
"role_superclass_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Jefe de Gobierno de la Ciudad de México"
},
"role_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Head of Mexico City government"
},
"role_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Jefe de Gobierno de la Ciudad de México"
},
"name_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "José Ramón Amieva Gálvez"
},
"name_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "José Ramón Amieva Gálvez"
},
"org" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q52634094"
},
"org_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "governor and cabinet of Ciudad de México"
},
"org_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "gobernador y gabinete de Ciudad de México"
},
"statement" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/statement/Q28367149-362ce499-493d-2237-c4a4-1af6637c3792"
},
"org_jurisdiction" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1489"
}
}, {
"party" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q16985955"
},
"party_name_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Independiente"
},
"party_name_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Independiente"
},
"item" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q28367149"
},
"district" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1489"
},
"district_name_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Mexico City"
},
"district_name_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Ciudad de México"
},
"role" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2962015"
},
"role_superclass" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2962015"
},
"role_superclass_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Head of Mexico City government"
},
"role_superclass_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Jefe de Gobierno de la Ciudad de México"
},
"role_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Head of Mexico City government"
},
"role_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "Jefe de Gobierno de la Ciudad de México"
},
"name_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "José Ramón Amieva Gálvez"
},
"name_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "José Ramón Amieva Gálvez"
},
"org" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q52634094"
},
"org_en" : {
"xml:lang" : "en",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "governor and cabinet of Ciudad de México"
},
"org_es" : {
"xml:lang" : "es",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "gobernador y gabinete de Ciudad de México"
},
"statement" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/statement/Q28367149-5e24d45f-41b6-d3dc-dec2-5a3f4b4e9fac"
},
"org_jurisdiction" : {
"type" : "uri",
"value" : "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1489"
},
"start" : {
"datatype" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime",
"type" : "literal",
"value" : "2018-01-01T00:00:00Z"
}
} ]
}
} |
{"title":"Recount.2008.TV.DVDRip.XviD-NODLABS","uid":4338478,"size":1466402142,"categoryP":"video","categoryS":"movies","magnet":"?xt=urn:btih:34ae648b2edf1664c055127d7da4052364c65fad&dn=Recount.2008.TV.DVDRip.XviD-NODLABS&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969","seeders":1,"leechers":0,"uploader":"AiTB","files":3,"time":1218415385,"description":"more info\n <a href="\nhttp://www.btarena.org/movies/recount-2008-tv-dvdrip-xvid-nodlabs" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://www.btarena.org/movies/recount-2008-tv-dvdrip-xvid-nodlabs</a>","torrent":{"xt":"urn:btih:34ae648b2edf1664c055127d7da4052364c65fad","amp;dn":"Recount.2008.TV.DVDRip.XviD-NODLABS","amp;tr":["udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80","udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337","udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969","udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969"],"infoHash":"34ae648b2edf1664c055127d7da4052364c65fad","infoHashBuffer":{"type":"Buffer","data":[52,174,100,139,46,223,22,100,192,85,18,125,125,164,5,35,100,198,95,173]},"announce":[],"urlList":[]}} |
[
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bQ8-4p_mIwk/TsVIEN6QofI/AAAAAAAAB2A/ztm5jtJ_wtI/s0/000.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dT8YcFOdayk/TsVII2PejpI/AAAAAAAAB2I/5rWKVw_7hbU/s0/001.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_ejy1epEft8/TsVIPzau7sI/AAAAAAAAB2Q/02VzRYEYS3A/s0/002.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bvyZ8U1k3Ts/TsVIWouVeyI/AAAAAAAAB2Y/clf57yj7a5M/s0/003.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-8HKZPDMa8mE/TsVIb_4UD7I/AAAAAAAAB2g/0qcPNlbSiKQ/s0/004.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C3GMqYQ0gzg/TsVIiz6etSI/AAAAAAAAB2s/NmhrY-9rcLc/s0/005.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0p7g9Pe0Z5g/TsVIjhL1jmI/AAAAAAAAB2w/LTPOkxOsGp0/s0/006.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oGXCzL9Aqe4/TsVIkVCcidI/AAAAAAAAB28/-rRYbroLaW0/s0/007.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rck5rlKMolc/TsVIlBA4AAI/AAAAAAAAB3E/lcbYHxhRnsg/s0/008.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fIciBv-MEAI/TsVIl0kXYEI/AAAAAAAAB3M/6utL91GitpE/s0/009.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_CdNOzBDRXo/TsVImJMqQFI/AAAAAAAAB3U/bKH54IKsFfA/s0/010.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-W-M-gbrRHE8/TsVIm8Ka5eI/AAAAAAAAB3c/iWpfDBxY__8/s0/011.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YMN7LRclql8/TsVInbjlNVI/AAAAAAAAB3k/wOhhij0nv8c/s0/012.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Q7r7sCz-6aE/TsVIoTwgySI/AAAAAAAAB3w/6geHMUg8kiU/s0/013.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VlsvlOBo07I/TsVIo-tUBMI/AAAAAAAAB34/nEz7mYB2_TU/s0/014.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ovFPWwUxQzw/TsVIpmIB07I/AAAAAAAAB4A/dVOgD_wvFXY/s0/015.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-W_57KAWks6E/TsVIqabjajI/AAAAAAAAB4I/kgZYttp7yDM/s0/016.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J_jDRTnSWAg/TsVIq77vXQI/AAAAAAAAB4Q/Qu8HtbwjNMM/s0/017.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wYALYIryL1s/TsVIrTeuRII/AAAAAAAAB4Y/rq6TufrH5zs/s0/018.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eHJ_wy4CZk0/TsVIripl-uI/AAAAAAAAB4g/Yo1yjZvbVYU/s0/019.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BDR81C9e2ko/TsVIsefFkqI/AAAAAAAAB4o/HzW33hCajUo/s0/020.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zwYeQp0HBd0/TsVItI_cC0I/AAAAAAAAB4w/gf_XmzhOJBI/s0/021.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SWvhpylVcPg/TsVIt1ySpXI/AAAAAAAAB44/FOEPcQ6r0IQ/s0/022.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wFgy3GCA4R4/TsVIubXi1kI/AAAAAAAAB5A/jaPhRdZ0WQY/s0/023.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--34BJuJbSX8/TsVIvf1XEII/AAAAAAAAB5I/pz8Q13SdYVc/s0/024.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hbkTqRkcl28/TsVIxbSOFYI/AAAAAAAAB5Q/h2wd3d36JyI/s0/025.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-vBHIlgyfx90/TsVIyI1oZMI/AAAAAAAAB5Y/wgVMXWo8CEs/s0/026.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Kua8Mb8mi7E/TsVIzZbGP6I/AAAAAAAAB5g/ppKl9AXKKWQ/s0/027.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_JWeER-uM3k/TsVIz9zQhuI/AAAAAAAAB5o/_nHSGJWvcS8/s0/028.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zXOu7Wetn9U/TsVI0ZlFqeI/AAAAAAAAB5w/8H87NhXN-sA/s0/029.png",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IUa7YbWiAt4/TsVI1L0ZM-I/AAAAAAAAB54/3sguwo70CB4/s0/030.png"
] |
{
"data": [
{
"id": "motorola-xoom-with-wi-fi",
"imageUrl": "img/motorola-xoom-with-wi-fi.jpg"
},
{
"id": "motorola-atrix-4g",
"imageUrl": "img/motorola-atrix-4g.jpg"
},
{
"id": "dell-streak-7",
"imageUrl": "img/dell-streak-7.jpg"
},
{
"id": "samsung-gem",
"imageUrl": "img/samsung-gem.jpg"
},
{
"id": "dell-venue",
"imageUrl": "img/dell-venue.jpg"
}
]
} |
[{"text": "\n 【重磅：英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心(National Cyber Security Centre)在一份尚未公布的报告中已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。报道援引一位知情人士称，由于是英国“五眼联盟”成员，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生 展开全文c \n 【重磅：英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心(National Cyber Security Centre)在一份尚未公布的报告中已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。报道援引一位知情人士称，由于是英国“五眼联盟”成员，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对国家安全的威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，他们将会以审慎方式继续允许他们的通讯服务商使用中国设备，只要采取英国建议的防范措施。英国国家网络安全中心也正在参与英国政府对通讯基础设施的评估。这项评估由英国数字、文化、媒体和体育部(DCMS)牵头，预计在今年春季完成。报道援引知情人士称，DCMS的包括可能会包括如何应对华为对5G网络安全威胁的建议措施，可能会推荐供应商多样化，并对5G网络的某些领域进行部分限制。上周五，英国秘密情报机构军情六处(MI6)负责人Alex Younge表示，英国可能对华为采取相对温和的立场，他表示，这个问题太复杂，不能简单地禁止华为。他表示，这是一个“比加入或退出更复杂的问题”，各国“有主权解决这些问题”。评：美国费尽心机组织的对华为5G设备的围堵边境墙开始出现裂缝。 收起全文d\n", "author": "平民王小石", "time": "平民王小石2019年02月18日16:43 来自魅族16旗舰手机", "transmit": " 转发 49", "comment": "评论 27", "zan": " 73"}, {"text": "\n英国结论：使用华为设备5G网络的风险在可控范围内，英国国家网络安全中心（UK National Cyber Security Centre）的研究得出这一结论。 《金融时报》说，英政府的结论对欧洲领导人来说分量很重，因为英国是“五眼联盟”成员，能够接触美国提供的敏感情报。. ", "author": "Kevin在纽约", "time": "Kevin在纽约2019年02月18日22:39 来自iPhoneXSMax", "transmit": " 转发 47", "comment": "评论 285", "zan": " 111"}, {"text": "\n 【英政府称华为参与5G风险可控 欧洲运营商难吞美国要求】美国国家安全局此前一直在向盟国情报机构提供游说信息，强调华为5G设备可能带来的风险。但在这一问题上，英国和德国方面都仍在就如何应对华为的参与进行研究，并未直接接受美国的施压。 O英政府称华为参与5G风险可控 欧洲运营商难吞美国要求 ", "author": "财新网", "time": "财新网2019年02月18日19:43 来自财新网", "transmit": " 转发 11", "comment": "评论 27", "zan": " 44"}, {"text": "\n华为风波是欧洲独立性试金石：中国不会像美国一样傲慢而变愚蠢去搞后门杀鸡取卵！迄今为止，没有任何国家、任何机构发现过华为在设备上做手脚、非法搜集设备使用者信息的证据，所有华为“为中国政府搜集情报”的指控都是基于想象。英国政府的结论，即英国国家网络安全中心认定，有办法限制在未来5G高 展开全文c \n华为风波是欧洲独立性试金石：中国不会像美国一样傲慢而变愚蠢去搞后门杀鸡取卵！迄今为止，没有任何国家、任何机构发现过华为在设备上做手脚、非法搜集设备使用者信息的证据，所有华为“为中国政府搜集情报”的指控都是基于想象。英国政府的结论，即英国国家网络安全中心认定，有办法限制在未来5G高速网络中使用华为设备的风险，为打消人们的这种担心提供了第三方的可信依据。其实对“华为搞情报”的担心本来就没那么重，因为它在市场和政治逻辑上都讲不通。华为这样的高科技巨头如果这么干，无异于自杀。中国政府如果强迫华为这么干，等于是扼杀国家的新兴产业，而华为所带动的产业繁荣对中国国家利益的贡献是一点情报根本无法同日而语的。近段时间西方有一些人跟着炒作“华为威胁”，背离了基本的实事求是精神，他们搞的是意识形态优先，为营造排挤中国的“政治正确”推波助澜。是否能够实事求是地使用物美价廉的华为设备，建设一个高效、便宜的5G网络，是欧洲能否捍卫自己独立角色的试金石。O社评：欧洲有独立性吗？华为风波是试金石 收起全文d\n", "author": "HW前HR", "time": "HW前HR2019年02月18日21:55 来自HUAWEIMate20Pro", "transmit": " 转发 59", "comment": "评论 57", "zan": " 107"}, {"text": "\n 【美国遭“沉重打击”？英国政府认为华为5G设备风险可控】英国《金融时报》2月17日称，英国政府已得出结论，认为5G网络使用华为设备所产生的风险可得到有效控制。这个结论沉重打击了美国说服盟国把华为挡在电信系统门外的努力。新加坡《联合早报》18日评论称，华为参与英国未来网络建设因此浮现生机。 ", "author": "新浪军事", "time": "新浪军事2019年02月18日10:52 来自微博weibo.com", "transmit": " 转发 52", "comment": "评论 98", "zan": " 397"}, {"text": "\n 【重磅：英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备 展开全文c \n 【重磅：英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备，只要采取英国建议的防范措施。O重磅：英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控 收起全文d\n", "author": "华尔街见闻APP", "time": "华尔街见闻APP2019年02月18日09:57 来自微博weibo.com", "transmit": " 转发 31", "comment": "评论 22", "zan": " 50"}, {"text": "\n英国政府已经得出结论，认为5G网络使用华为的通讯设备所产生的风险可以得到有效的控制，华为参与英国未来的网络建设因此浮现一丝生机。英国军情六处负责人杨格表示，英国可能会就华为问题采取相对温和的立场，因为华为问题过于复杂，不能简单地一禁了事。他同时强调，各国都有权找出解决问题的办法。 展开全文c \n英国政府已经得出结论，认为5G网络使用华为的通讯设备所产生的风险可以得到有效的控制，华为参与英国未来的网络建设因此浮现一丝生机。英国军情六处负责人杨格表示，英国可能会就华为问题采取相对温和的立场，因为华为问题过于复杂，不能简单地一禁了事。他同时强调，各国都有权找出解决问题的办法。英国政府通信总部前负责人汉尼根最近也在媒体撰文说，英国国家网络安全中心“从未发现中国通过华为实施国家网络活动的证据”，“任何中国科技对5G网络的任何部分构成无法接受的威胁的指称都是胡说八道”。《金融时报》援引一位消息人士的话说，英国政府的结论对欧洲领导人来说分量很重，因为英国是“五眼联盟”成员，能够接触美国提供的敏感情报。他说：“其他国家就能争辩说，如果英国确信国家安全面临的威胁能够减轻，他们也能向公众和美国政府保证，他们将会审慎行事，继续允许他们的通讯服务商使用中国设备，前提是他们采取英国建议的防范措施。”消息人士透露，英国国家网络安全中心正在参与英国通讯基础设施的政府评估，并在计划今年春季发布的调查报告中提出防范华为对5G网络安全威胁的建议措施，后者可能包括提高供应商的多样性，并宣布5G网络的部分区域为禁区。 收起全文d\n", "author": "寰亚SYHP", "time": "寰亚SYHP2019年02月18日08:40", "transmit": " 转发 31", "comment": "评论 101", "zan": " 126"}, {"text": "\n 【“铁杆盟友”再打脸美国，英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已得出结论，在5G网络中使用华为设备风险可控。英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”，这在欧洲及全球都是巨大的示范效应，痛击美国的华为5G“安全威胁”阴谋#华为##5G# ", "author": "建华Wei业", "time": "建华Wei业2019年02月18日12:22 来自华为超话", "transmit": " 转发 12", "comment": "评论 26", "zan": " 42"}, {"text": "\n 【英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备，只要 展开全文c \n 【英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备，只要采取英国建议的防范措施。详见O英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控 收起全文d\n", "author": "环球市场播报", "time": "环球市场播报2019年02月18日08:53 来自微博weibo.com", "transmit": " 转发 29", "comment": "评论 8", "zan": " 24"}, {"text": "\n 【英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备，只要 展开全文c \n 【英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备，只要采取英国建议的防范措施。O英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控 收起全文d\n", "author": "中国经济网", "time": "中国经济网2019年02月18日12:15 来自微博weibo.com", "transmit": " 转发 9", "comment": "评论 8", "zan": " 24"}, {"text": "\n 自我封闭没有前途，改革开放才是正路美国遭“沉重打击”？英国政府认为华为风险可控O美国遭“沉重打击”？英国政府认为华为5G设备风险可控 在中美两国在慕尼黑国际安全会议上就华为问题激烈交锋之际，当地时间2月17日，英国《金融时报》称，英国政府已经得出结论，认为5G网络使用华为的通讯设备所产生的风险可以得到有效的控 展开全文c \n 自我封闭没有前途，改革开放才是正路美国遭“沉重打击”？英国政府认为华为风险可控O美国遭“沉重打击”？英国政府认为华为5G设备风险可控 在中美两国在慕尼黑国际安全会议上就华为问题激烈交锋之际，当地时间2月17日，英国《金融时报》称，英国政府已经得出结论，认为5G网络使用华为的通讯设备所产生的风险可以得到有效的控制。这个结论沉重打击了美国说服盟国把华为挡在高速电信系统门外的努力。对此，新加坡《联合早报》18日评论称，华为参与英国未来的网络建设因此浮现一丝生机。《华尔街日报》15日也刊文称，美国政府试图让一些关系最密切的欧洲盟友放弃使用中国企业生产的电信设备，但这一努力似乎很难奏效。来自欧洲最大的移动和互联网服务提供商的反馈却让这项决定变得复杂。 收起全文d\n", "author": "中科大胡不归", "time": "中科大胡不归2019年02月18日12:40 来自观网App", "transmit": " 转发 11", "comment": "评论 3", "zan": " 45"}, {"text": "\n 【英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备，只要 展开全文c \n 【英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控】据英国《金融时报》报道，英国国家网络安全中心已经得出结论称，在5G网络中使用华为设备的风险是可控。知情人士称，英国的结论对欧洲其他国家将产生“重大影响”。如果英国有信心控制对威胁，其他国家也可以向公众保证，以审慎方式继续允许使用中国设备，只要采取英国建议的防范措施。O重磅：英国确认华为设备在5G应用上的风险可控 收起全文d\n", "author": "见闻实时新闻", "time": "见闻实时新闻2019年02月18日09:44 来自360安全浏览器", "transmit": " 转发 22", "comment": "评论 2", "zan": " 5"}, {"text": "\n 【美国遭“沉重打击”？英国政府认为华为5G设备风险可控】在中美两国在慕尼黑国际安全会议上就华为问题激烈交锋之际，当地时间2月17日，英国《金融时报》称，英国政府已经得出结论，认为5G网络使用华为的通讯设备所产生的风险可以得到有效的控制。这个结论沉重打击了美国说服盟国把华为挡在高速电信系 展开全文c \n 【美国遭“沉重打击”？英国政府认为华为5G设备风险可控】在中美两国在慕尼黑国际安全会议上就华为问题激烈交锋之际，当地时间2月17日，英国《金融时报》称，英国政府已经得出结论，认为5G网络使用华为的通讯设备所产生的风险可以得到有效的控制。这个结论沉重打击了美国说服盟国把华为挡在高速电信系统门外的努力。对此，新加坡《联合早报》18日评论称，华为参与英国未来的网络建设因此浮现一丝生机。《华尔街日报》15日也刊文称，美国政府试图让一些关系最密切的欧洲盟友放弃使用中国企业生产的电信设备，但这一努力似乎很难奏效。来自欧洲最大的移动和互联网服务提供商的反馈却让这项决定变得复杂。O生机？英国政府认为华为5G设备风险可控 收起全文d\n", "author": "科工力量", "time": "科工力量2019年02月18日15:01 来自微博weibo.com", "transmit": " 转发 6", "comment": "评论 20", "zan": " 39"}, {"text": "\n 媒体：英情报机构负责人暗示“不会施压彻底禁止华为”15日在慕尼黑，英国军情六处处长亚历克斯·扬格告诉媒体，在如何平衡安全风险和发展5G网络时，设备供应商匮乏是需要考虑的一个因素。此外，选择的第一原则是质量，与来自哪个国家没有关系。美国彭博社称，这是迄今为止英国情报机构最高负责人给出的 展开全文c \n 媒体：英情报机构负责人暗示“不会施压彻底禁止华为”15日在慕尼黑，英国军情六处处长亚历克斯·扬格告诉媒体，在如何平衡安全风险和发展5G网络时，设备供应商匮乏是需要考虑的一个因素。此外，选择的第一原则是质量，与来自哪个国家没有关系。美国彭博社称，这是迄今为止英国情报机构最高负责人给出的最强烈暗示：他不会施压彻底禁止华为。 还是两句话，天帮忙（中国市场和力量）、人争气（华为自己的技术和行为清白），让英国人做出合理判断。 上次小徐总接受英国媒体采访说以为一个华为5G设备里面的美国软件英国人会放心，结果不是。 网友都笑了，老谋深算的英帝国知道他生出的儿子美帝是干什么的。O美媒：英情报机构负责人暗示“不会施压彻底禁止华为” 收起全文d\n", "author": "HW前HR", "time": "HW前HR2019年02月18日08:19 来自HUAWEIMate20Pro", "transmit": " 转发 29", "comment": "评论 13", "zan": " 55"}, {"text": "\n 据两位知情人士称，英国国家网络安全中心(National Cyber Security Centre, NCSC)认定，英国有办法限制在未来5G超高速网络中使用华为设备的风险。这个结论沉重打击了美国说服盟国把华为挡在高速电信系统门外的努力。一位熟悉相关争论的人士表示，英国的结论对欧洲各国领导人将“有很大分量”，因为英国 展开全文c \n 据两位知情人士称，英国国家网络安全中心(National Cyber Security Centre, NCSC)认定，英国有办法限制在未来5G超高速网络中使用华为设备的风险。这个结论沉重打击了美国说服盟国把华为挡在高速电信系统门外的努力。一位熟悉相关争论的人士表示，英国的结论对欧洲各国领导人将“有很大分量”，因为英国是五眼联盟(Five Eyes)情报分享网络的成员，可以获得敏感的美国情报。 收起全文d\n", "author": "历史的进城", "time": "历史的进城2019年02月18日07:52 来自历史的进城Android", "transmit": " 转发 35", "comment": "评论 31", "zan": " 67"}] |
{"rendered": {"description": {"raw": "a new `groups` variable is added to the token to describe the groups that the user is part of\r\n", "markup": "markdown", "html": "<p>a new <code>groups</code> variable is added to the token to describe the groups that the user is part of</p>", "type": "rendered"}, "title": {"raw": "Add group data in token", "markup": "markdown", "html": "<p>Add group data in token</p>", "type": "rendered"}}, "type": "pullrequest", "description": "a new `groups` variable is added to the token to describe the groups that the user is part of\r\n", "links": {"decline": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8/decline"}, "diffstat": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/diffstat/osrf/cloudsim-auth:5c7a8d5d15f6%0D317e23f1df64?from_pullrequest_id=8"}, "commits": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8/commits.json"}, "self": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8.json"}, "comments": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8/comments_page=1.json"}, "merge": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8/merge"}, "html": {"href": "#!/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pull-requests/8"}, "activity": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8/activity.json"}, "diff": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/diff/osrf/cloudsim-auth:5c7a8d5d15f6%0D317e23f1df64?from_pullrequest_id=8"}, "approve": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8/approve"}, "statuses": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/pullrequests/8/statuses_page=1.json"}}, "title": "Add group data in token", "close_source_branch": true, "reviewers": [], "id": 8, "destination": {"commit": {"hash": "317e23f1df64", "type": "commit", "links": {"self": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/commit/317e23f1df64.json"}, "html": {"href": "#!/osrf/cloudsim-auth/commits/317e23f1df64"}}}, "repository": {"links": {"self": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth.json"}, "html": {"href": "#!/osrf/cloudsim-auth"}, "avatar": {"href": "data/bytebucket.org/ravatar/{fcbe065d-e7d7-4c83-9ca6-5e91154a993c}ts=default"}}, "type": "repository", "name": "cloudsim-auth", "full_name": "osrf/cloudsim-auth", "uuid": "{fcbe065d-e7d7-4c83-9ca6-5e91154a993c}"}, "branch": {"name": "default"}}, "created_on": "2016-09-13T23:50:42.776467+00:00", "summary": {"raw": "a new `groups` variable is added to the token to describe the groups that the user is part of\r\n", "markup": "markdown", "html": "<p>a new <code>groups</code> variable is added to the token to describe the groups that the user is part of</p>", "type": "rendered"}, "source": {"commit": {"hash": "0537296a4a3a", "type": "commit", "links": {"self": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/commit/0537296a4a3a.json"}, "html": {"href": "#!/osrf/cloudsim-auth/commits/0537296a4a3a"}}}, "repository": {"links": {"self": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth.json"}, "html": {"href": "#!/osrf/cloudsim-auth"}, "avatar": {"href": "data/bytebucket.org/ravatar/{fcbe065d-e7d7-4c83-9ca6-5e91154a993c}ts=default"}}, "type": "repository", "name": "cloudsim-auth", "full_name": "osrf/cloudsim-auth", "uuid": "{fcbe065d-e7d7-4c83-9ca6-5e91154a993c}"}, "branch": {"name": "token_group"}}, "comment_count": 37, "state": "MERGED", "task_count": 1, "participants": [{"role": "PARTICIPANT", "participated_on": "2016-09-19T17:35:35.995932+00:00", "type": "participant", "approved": true, "user": {"display_name": "Hugo Boyer", "uuid": "{3d87874e-7099-4981-b04f-57f0272faa7d}", "links": {"self": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/users/%7B3d87874e-7099-4981-b04f-57f0272faa7d%7D"}, "html": {"href": "https://bitbucket.org/%7B3d87874e-7099-4981-b04f-57f0272faa7d%7D/"}, "avatar": {"href": "data/secure.gravatar.com/avatar/21198da8539b599e3633017f5f5f8150d=httpsavatar-management--avatars.us-west-2.prod.public.atl-paas.netinitialsHB-6.png"}}, "nickname": "hugomatic", "type": "user", "account_id": "557058:869c02bb-b246-4cdc-9db3-0064e8add185"}}, {"role": "PARTICIPANT", "participated_on": "2016-09-27T00:22:54.661863+00:00", "type": "participant", "approved": true, "user": {"display_name": "Louise Poubel", "uuid": "{5cfa2075-477b-4ded-bdb9-8d2479544ec4}", "links": {"self": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/users/%7B5cfa2075-477b-4ded-bdb9-8d2479544ec4%7D"}, "html": {"href": "https://bitbucket.org/%7B5cfa2075-477b-4ded-bdb9-8d2479544ec4%7D/"}, "avatar": {"href": "https://avatar-management--avatars.us-west-2.prod.public.atl-paas.net/557058:6ff86fcb-b7ab-44a5-b8a6-f6d9cae8b6e8/7d903d90-c5ea-4182-b7ef-0d467e9e1c74/128"}}, "nickname": "chapulina", "type": "user", "account_id": "557058:6ff86fcb-b7ab-44a5-b8a6-f6d9cae8b6e8"}}, {"role": "PARTICIPANT", "participated_on": "2016-09-27T00:10:29.345624+00:00", "type": "participant", "approved": false, "user": {"display_name": "Ian Chen", "uuid": "{eaa6fca5-6deb-43f6-907f-971c144735dd}", "links": {"self": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/users/%7Beaa6fca5-6deb-43f6-907f-971c144735dd%7D"}, "html": {"href": "https://bitbucket.org/%7Beaa6fca5-6deb-43f6-907f-971c144735dd%7D/"}, "avatar": {"href": "https://avatar-management--avatars.us-west-2.prod.public.atl-paas.net/557058:10b01d41-a2e9-4a41-a907-e6e2f03b6cd5/1e4adcdf-1946-4280-9aea-eb5f15a7f912/128"}}, "nickname": "Ian Chen", "type": "user", "account_id": "557058:10b01d41-a2e9-4a41-a907-e6e2f03b6cd5"}}], "reason": "", "updated_on": "2016-09-28T02:59:22.956020+00:00", "author": {"display_name": "Ian Chen", "uuid": "{eaa6fca5-6deb-43f6-907f-971c144735dd}", "links": {"self": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/users/%7Beaa6fca5-6deb-43f6-907f-971c144735dd%7D"}, "html": {"href": "https://bitbucket.org/%7Beaa6fca5-6deb-43f6-907f-971c144735dd%7D/"}, "avatar": {"href": "https://avatar-management--avatars.us-west-2.prod.public.atl-paas.net/557058:10b01d41-a2e9-4a41-a907-e6e2f03b6cd5/1e4adcdf-1946-4280-9aea-eb5f15a7f912/128"}}, "nickname": "Ian Chen", "type": "user", "account_id": "557058:10b01d41-a2e9-4a41-a907-e6e2f03b6cd5"}, "merge_commit": {"hash": "5c7a8d5d15f6", "type": "commit", "links": {"self": {"href": "data/repositories/osrf/cloudsim-auth/commit/5c7a8d5d15f6.json"}, "html": {"href": "#!/osrf/cloudsim-auth/commits/5c7a8d5d15f6"}}}, "closed_by": {"display_name": "Louise Poubel", "uuid": "{5cfa2075-477b-4ded-bdb9-8d2479544ec4}", "links": {"self": {"href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/users/%7B5cfa2075-477b-4ded-bdb9-8d2479544ec4%7D"}, "html": {"href": "https://bitbucket.org/%7B5cfa2075-477b-4ded-bdb9-8d2479544ec4%7D/"}, "avatar": {"href": "https://avatar-management--avatars.us-west-2.prod.public.atl-paas.net/557058:6ff86fcb-b7ab-44a5-b8a6-f6d9cae8b6e8/7d903d90-c5ea-4182-b7ef-0d467e9e1c74/128"}}, "nickname": "chapulina", "type": "user", "account_id": "557058:6ff86fcb-b7ab-44a5-b8a6-f6d9cae8b6e8"}} |
{"university of michigan": {"Citation Count": 61.667, "Geo Mean W Impact": 514.419, "Geo Mean Score": 25.102, "Arith Mean Score": 43.765, "Publication Count": 4.667}, "university of texas at austin": {"Citation Count": 69.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 95.067, "Geo Mean Score": 18.826, "Arith Mean Score": 32.824, "Publication Count": 3.5}, "university of washington": {"Citation Count": 0.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 4.068, "Geo Mean Score": 7.172, "Arith Mean Score": 12.504, "Publication Count": 1.333}, "rice university": {"Citation Count": 11.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 10.924, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "tsmc": {"Citation Count": 3.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 8.453, "Geo Mean Score": 8.068, "Arith Mean Score": 14.067, "Publication Count": 1.5}, "sandia national laboratories": {"Citation Count": 0.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 6.425, "Geo Mean Score": 1.345, "Arith Mean Score": 2.345, "Publication Count": 0.25}, "seoul national university": {"Citation Count": 9.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 31.995, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "city university of hong kong": {"Citation Count": 0.833, "Geo Mean W Impact": 5.5, "Geo Mean Score": 4.482, "Arith Mean Score": 7.815, "Publication Count": 0.833}, "university of california san diego": {"Citation Count": 36.233, "Geo Mean W Impact": 298.542, "Geo Mean Score": 17.392, "Arith Mean Score": 30.323, "Publication Count": 3.233}, "university of utah": {"Citation Count": 2.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 11.723, "Geo Mean Score": 4.482, "Arith Mean Score": 7.815, "Publication Count": 0.833}, "peking university": {"Citation Count": 24.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 126.508, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "national taiwan university": {"Citation Count": 12.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 43.783, "Geo Mean Score": 14.344, "Arith Mean Score": 25.008, "Publication Count": 2.667}, "national chi nan university": {"Citation Count": 0.667, "Geo Mean W Impact": 5.795, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "case western reserve university": {"Citation Count": 2.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 11.258, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "intel": {"Citation Count": 42.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 77.414, "Geo Mean Score": 32.274, "Arith Mean Score": 56.269, "Publication Count": 6.0}, "university of notre dame": {"Citation Count": 0.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 6.425, "Geo Mean Score": 1.345, "Arith Mean Score": 2.345, "Publication Count": 0.25}, "dresden university of technology": {"Citation Count": 5.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 336.519, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "illinois institute of technology": {"Citation Count": 25.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 37.05, "Geo Mean Score": 10.758, "Arith Mean Score": 18.756, "Publication Count": 2.0}, "carnegie mellon university": {"Citation Count": 12.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 28.511, "Geo Mean Score": 8.068, "Arith Mean Score": 14.067, "Publication Count": 1.5}, "national chiao tung university": {"Citation Count": 65.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 118.114, "Geo Mean Score": 16.137, "Arith Mean Score": 28.134, "Publication Count": 3.0}, "google": {"Citation Count": 2.2, "Geo Mean W Impact": 450.2, "Geo Mean Score": 1.076, "Arith Mean Score": 1.876, "Publication Count": 0.2}, "university of thessaly": {"Citation Count": 7.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 14.419, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "globalfoundries": {"Citation Count": 5.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 116.757, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "goethe university frankfurt": {"Citation Count": 9.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 16.303, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "university of hong kong": {"Citation Count": 6.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 42.598, "Geo Mean Score": 4.482, "Arith Mean Score": 7.815, "Publication Count": 0.833}, "cadence design systems": {"Citation Count": 0.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 2.319, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "georgia institute of technology": {"Citation Count": 15.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 49.499, "Geo Mean Score": 10.758, "Arith Mean Score": 18.756, "Publication Count": 2.0}, "hewlett packard": {"Citation Count": 2.2, "Geo Mean W Impact": 450.2, "Geo Mean Score": 1.076, "Arith Mean Score": 1.876, "Publication Count": 0.2}, "stmicroelectronics": {"Citation Count": 1.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 8.568, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "hp labs": {"Citation Count": 2.2, "Geo Mean W Impact": 450.2, "Geo Mean Score": 1.076, "Arith Mean Score": 1.876, "Publication Count": 0.2}, "katholieke universiteit leuven": {"Citation Count": 1.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 15.355, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "mediatek": {"Citation Count": 0.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 2.319, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "university of california santa barbara": {"Citation Count": 4.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 22.016, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "university of connecticut": {"Citation Count": 50.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 53.797, "Geo Mean Score": 10.758, "Arith Mean Score": 18.756, "Publication Count": 2.0}, "tsinghua university": {"Citation Count": 12.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 18.777, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "missouri university of science and technology": {"Citation Count": 3.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 13.764, "Geo Mean Score": 8.068, "Arith Mean Score": 14.067, "Publication Count": 1.5}, "arizona state university": {"Citation Count": 7.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 14.419, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "pace university": {"Citation Count": 2.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 7.953, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "northeastern university": {"Citation Count": 6.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 13.378, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "pdf solutions": {"Citation Count": 2.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 11.258, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "ipc": {"Citation Count": 5.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 12.249, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "lawrence berkeley national laboratory": {"Citation Count": 0.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 6.425, "Geo Mean Score": 1.345, "Arith Mean Score": 2.345, "Publication Count": 0.25}, "texas a m university": {"Citation Count": 30.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 45.285, "Geo Mean Score": 26.895, "Arith Mean Score": 46.891, "Publication Count": 5.0}, "university of freiburg": {"Citation Count": 14.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 75.805, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "inesc id": {"Citation Count": 2.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 13.947, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "michigan technological university": {"Citation Count": 6.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 11.14, "Geo Mean Score": 10.758, "Arith Mean Score": 18.756, "Publication Count": 2.0}, "broadcom": {"Citation Count": 1.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 5.858, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "yale university": {"Citation Count": 5.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 106.105, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "freescale semiconductor": {"Citation Count": 4.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 22.016, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "university of california berkeley": {"Citation Count": 4.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 24.705, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "the chinese university of hong kong": {"Citation Count": 17.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 43.532, "Geo Mean Score": 8.068, "Arith Mean Score": 14.067, "Publication Count": 1.5}, "american university of beirut": {"Citation Count": 4.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 352.299, "Geo Mean Score": 1.345, "Arith Mean Score": 2.345, "Publication Count": 0.25}, "university of passau": {"Citation Count": 14.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 75.805, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "university of new south wales": {"Citation Count": 2.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 7.953, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "northwestern university": {"Citation Count": 9.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 37.414, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "ibm": {"Citation Count": 55.833, "Geo Mean W Impact": 101.178, "Geo Mean Score": 21.964, "Arith Mean Score": 38.294, "Publication Count": 4.083}, "national cheng kung university": {"Citation Count": 51.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 144.597, "Geo Mean Score": 31.377, "Arith Mean Score": 54.706, "Publication Count": 5.833}, "qualcomm": {"Citation Count": 28.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 151.611, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "university of massachusetts amherst": {"Citation Count": 3.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 9.601, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "george washington university": {"Citation Count": 0.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 0.5, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "centre national de la recherche scientifique": {"Citation Count": 3.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 19.643, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "university of texas at dallas": {"Citation Count": 5.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 106.105, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "university of minnesota": {"Citation Count": 33.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 55.769, "Geo Mean Score": 21.516, "Arith Mean Score": 37.513, "Publication Count": 4.0}, "national tsing hua university": {"Citation Count": 2.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 7.421, "Geo Mean Score": 8.068, "Arith Mean Score": 14.067, "Publication Count": 1.5}, "texas instruments": {"Citation Count": 5.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 106.105, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "nanyang technological university": {"Citation Count": 4.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 352.299, "Geo Mean Score": 1.345, "Arith Mean Score": 2.345, "Publication Count": 0.25}, "mentor graphics": {"Citation Count": 17.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 22.518, "Geo Mean Score": 10.758, "Arith Mean Score": 18.756, "Publication Count": 2.0}, "fudan university": {"Citation Count": 4.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 24.705, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "national chung cheng university": {"Citation Count": 4.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 85.85, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "drexel university": {"Citation Count": 4.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 7.322, "Geo Mean Score": 4.482, "Arith Mean Score": 7.815, "Publication Count": 0.833}, "karlsruhe institute of technology": {"Citation Count": 0.667, "Geo Mean W Impact": 5.795, "Geo Mean Score": 1.793, "Arith Mean Score": 3.126, "Publication Count": 0.333}, "polytechnic institute of new york university": {"Citation Count": 28.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 151.611, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "university of california los angeles": {"Citation Count": 33.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 59.86, "Geo Mean Score": 21.516, "Arith Mean Score": 37.513, "Publication Count": 4.0}, "indian institute of technology madras": {"Citation Count": 3.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 9.601, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "university of toronto": {"Citation Count": 7.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 14.419, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "school of electrical and electronic engineering university of manchester": {"Citation Count": 8.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 15.39, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "university of california santa cruz": {"Citation Count": 0.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 0.5, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "synopsys": {"Citation Count": 40.833, "Geo Mean W Impact": 232.701, "Geo Mean Score": 11.654, "Arith Mean Score": 20.319, "Publication Count": 2.167}, "nvidia": {"Citation Count": 0.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 6.425, "Geo Mean Score": 1.345, "Arith Mean Score": 2.345, "Publication Count": 0.25}, "university of illinois at urbana champaign": {"Citation Count": 54.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 76.803, "Geo Mean Score": 28.688, "Arith Mean Score": 50.017, "Publication Count": 5.333}, "shanghai jiao tong university": {"Citation Count": 0.333, "Geo Mean W Impact": 4.068, "Geo Mean Score": 7.172, "Arith Mean Score": 12.504, "Publication Count": 1.333}, "university of southern california": {"Citation Count": 9.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 31.995, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "pennsylvania state university": {"Citation Count": 21.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 29.68, "Geo Mean Score": 10.758, "Arith Mean Score": 18.756, "Publication Count": 2.0}, "oracle corporation": {"Citation Count": 7.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 59.962, "Geo Mean Score": 4.482, "Arith Mean Score": 7.815, "Publication Count": 0.833}, "northwestern polytechnical university": {"Citation Count": 1.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 5.879, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "duke university": {"Citation Count": 7.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 38.153, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "ohio state university": {"Citation Count": 0.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 2.319, "Geo Mean Score": 5.379, "Arith Mean Score": 9.378, "Publication Count": 1.0}, "universidade federal do rio grande do sul": {"Citation Count": 2.5, "Geo Mean W Impact": 13.947, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "purdue university": {"Citation Count": 9.0, "Geo Mean W Impact": 48.911, "Geo Mean Score": 2.689, "Arith Mean Score": 4.689, "Publication Count": 0.5}, "university of pittsburgh": {"Citation Count": 21.167, "Geo Mean W Impact": 60.246, "Geo Mean Score": 10.31, "Arith Mean Score": 17.975, "Publication Count": 1.917}} |
{"categorias":[""],"corpora":"Fundação Gabo seleciona jornalistas para curso gratuito sobre cobertura da migração venezuelana\nA Fundação Gabo, criada pelo jornalista e vencedor do Nobel de literatura Gabriel García Márquez, está com inscrições abertas para o curso \"Refugiados e Migrantes: Como Cobrir o Caso Venezuelano\". As aulas serão ministradas em espanhol pela jornalista colombiana Ginna Morelo e pelo escritor venezuelano Tulio Hernández. O curso de cinco dias é uma parceria [...] ... Leia post completo no blog Leia mais (02/05/2020 - 10h53)\nFundação Gabo seleciona jornalistas para curso gratuito sobre cobertura da migração venezuelana – Novo em Folha Menu Assine Folha de S.Paulo Entrar Buscar Colunas e Blogs Blogs Blogs Ícone fechar Busca Buscar no sites da Folha de S.Paulo Buscar Ícone fechar Novo em Folha Programa de Treinamento Novo em Folha Perfil do blogueiro Ícone fechar O blog é uma extensão do Programa de Treinamento em Jornalismo da Folha. É produzido pela equipe da Editoria de Treinamento, pelos trainees e por outros colaboradores da Redação da Folha. Perfil completo Link externo, abre um novo e-mail Ícone envelope Link externo, abre perfil do blogueiro no Facebook Link externo, abre perfil do blogueiro no Twitter Link externo, abre página RSS do blog Ícone RSS Home Geral Dicas Cursos Reflexões Concursos e prêmios Inspirações Vagas O blog pergunta Ferramentas Blog responde Sugestão de leitura Como foi feito Desafio Great Texto dos trainees Humor no jornalismo Palestra Exercício Bolsas de estudos Eventos Mais Patrocínios Assine Fechar sidebar menu Ícone fechar Editar perfil Senha e conta Newsletter Assinatura Sair Edição Impressa Últimas Contraste Claro Escuro Edições United States of America flag ENG Spain flag ESP Siga a folha Link externo, abre a página da Folha no Twitter Link externo, abre a página da Folha no Linkedin Ícone Linkedin Link externo, abre o perfil da Folha no Instagram Link externo, abre a página RSS da Folha Ícone RSS 5.fev.2020 às 10h53 Fundação Gabo seleciona jornalistas para curso gratuito sobre cobertura da migração venezuelana compartilhamento Especial compartilhamento Especial Assinantes podem liberar 5 acessos por dia para conteúdos da Folha Assinantes podem liberar 5 acessos por dia para conteúdos da Folha Assinantes podem liberar 5 acessos por dia para conteúdos da Folha ASSINE ou FAÇA LOGIN Ícone mais opções Ícone fechar Copiar link O escritor venezuelano Tulio Hernández e a jornalista colombiana Ginna Morelo (Fundação Gabo/Divulgação) treinamento A Fundação Gabo, criada pelo jornalista e vencedor do Nobel de literatura Gabriel García Márquez, está com inscrições abertas para o curso “Refugiados e Migrantes: Como Cobrir o Caso Venezuelano”. As aulas serão ministradas em espanhol pela jornalista colombiana Ginna Morelo e pelo escritor venezuelano Tulio Hernández. O curso de cinco dias é uma parceria da Fundação Gabo com o Alto Comissariado das Nações Unidas para os Refugiados (Acnur). As aulas serão em Medelín, na Colômbia, de 13 a 17 de abril, para 11 jornalistas selecionados. Podem se inscrever jornalistas do Brasil, Colômbia, Equador, Chile, Peru e Argentina, com experiência comprovada de pelo menos três anos. Cada um dos escolhidos precisa pagar apenas uma taxa de matrícula de US$ 100 (cerca de R$ 425). Os participantes receberão hospedagem, passagens aéreas, alimentação e seguro médico internacional. Ao final do curso, três participantes serão selecionados para apurar e produzir reportagens sobre a migração venezuelana. Para isso, receberão um subsídio de US$ 5.000 (cerca de R$ 21.000) e a mentoria de Ginna Morelo. A inscrição deve conter uma biografia do candidato em até 400 palavras, com ênfase na experiência profissional e uma proposta de projeto jornalístico sobre o tema em até 600 palavras. Além disso, os candidatos precisam apresentar uma carta do veículo em que trabalham expressando o compromisso de publicar o material produzido no curso. Os nomes dos jornalistas selecionados para o curso serão divulgados no dia 13 de março. As inscrições vão até 2 de março e podem ser feitas pelo site. Envie sua notícia Erramos? Busca Busca no blog Mais lidas Folha abre inscrições para Programa de Treinamento em Jornalismo Diário Jornalistas idealizam manchetes que gostariam de ler em 2020 Jornalistas criam plataforma que reúne mulheres especialistas MIT recebe inscrições para bolsa de estudo em jornalismo científico Prêmio internacional de jornalismo de dados está com inscrições abertas Tags jornalismo treinamento prêmio Folha redação curso reportagem Trainees dicas Marcelo Soares Premiação fotografia redes sociais estágio conselhos online frila matemática emprego Ciência e Saúde Folha de S.Paulo Topo Copyright Folha de S.Paulo. Todos os direitos reservados. É proibida a reprodução do conteúdo desta página em qualquer meio de comunicação, eletrônico ou impresso, sem autorização escrita da Folhapress"}
|
{
"order": "39447"
,"word": "biographies"
,"count": "52"
}
|
[
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/439473511",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-439473511",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 439473511,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzOTQ3MzUxMQ==",
"user": {
"login": "mroeschke",
"id": 10647082,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjEwNjQ3MDgy",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/10647082?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke",
"html_url": "https://github.com/mroeschke",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-16T17:52:18Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-16T17:52:18Z",
"author_association": "MEMBER",
"body": "I get the same error as you in the latest release v0.23.4, but this does not raise on master (as lot of timezone things were fixed recently) and will be available with the upcomming v0.24.0 release.\r\n\r\n```\r\nIn [3]: pd.__version__\r\nOut[3]: '0.24.0.dev0+1028.gdb2066b7d'\r\n\r\nIn [4]: import pandas as pd\r\n ...: idx = pd.date_range(start='2017-10-10', end='2017-10-20', fre\r\n ...: q='1H')\r\n ...: idx = idx.tz_localize('UTC').tz_convert('America/Sao_Paulo')\r\n ...: df = pd.DataFrame(data=list(range(len(idx))), index=idx)\r\n ...: groups = df.groupby(pd.Grouper(freq='1D'))\r\n ...:\r\n ...:\r\n\r\nIn [5]: groups\r\nOut[5]: <pandas.core.groupby.generic.DataFrameGroupBy object at 0x117b940b8>\r\n```\r\n\r\nCanonically though, `df.groupby(pd.Grouper(freq='1D'))` is equivalent to `df.resample('D')`"
},
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/439555777",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-439555777",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 439555777,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzOTU1NTc3Nw==",
"user": {
"login": "gfyoung",
"id": 9273653,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjkyNzM2NTM=",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/9273653?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung",
"html_url": "https://github.com/gfyoung",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-16T23:05:22Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-16T23:05:22Z",
"author_association": "MEMBER",
"body": "@mroeschke : Add a test to close this? Or is this sufficiently covered?"
},
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/439556521",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-439556521",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 439556521,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzOTU1NjUyMQ==",
"user": {
"login": "mroeschke",
"id": 10647082,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjEwNjQ3MDgy",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/10647082?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke",
"html_url": "https://github.com/mroeschke",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-16T23:09:26Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-16T23:09:26Z",
"author_association": "MEMBER",
"body": "I _think_ this test covers a similar `resample` case, but I don't think we strictly have a test like this for `groupby(Grouper(...))`\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/db2066b7d31450aaa87f2efcef492162a3d08309/pandas/tests/test_resample.py#L2510"
},
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/439558560",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-439558560",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 439558560,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzOTU1ODU2MA==",
"user": {
"login": "gfyoung",
"id": 9273653,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjkyNzM2NTM=",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/9273653?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung",
"html_url": "https://github.com/gfyoung",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/gfyoung/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-16T23:21:18Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-16T23:21:18Z",
"author_association": "MEMBER",
"body": "Hmm...might as well add a test specifically for this case then. Doesn't hurt 🙂 "
},
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/439891462",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-439891462",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 439891462,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzOTg5MTQ2Mg==",
"user": {
"login": "pierremoulinier",
"id": 7794440,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjc3OTQ0NDA=",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/7794440?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pierremoulinier",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-19T13:25:05Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-19T13:25:05Z",
"author_association": "NONE",
"body": "Sorry for the late reply, I only just had a look at the behavior for 0.24.0 -- indeed it does not raise anymore but I am not sure the new behavior is correct.\r\n\r\nIt looks like if I call `groups.aggregate(pd.np.mean)` the timestamps in the resulting dataframe will be the following:\r\n```\r\n2017-10-10 00:00:00-03:00\r\n2017-10-11 00:00:00-03:00\r\n...\r\n2017-10-14 00:00:00-03:00\r\n2017-10-15 01:00:00-02:00\r\n2017-10-16 01:00:00-02:00\r\n2017-10-17 01:00:00-02:00\r\n...\r\n```\r\n\r\nIn other words all the days get 'shifted' by the clock change, and timestamps on or after the 16th of October no longer represent the start of the local day.\r\n\r\nI guess this is correct if we consider that `1D` acually means \"24 hours\", however this is not the behavior I was expecting when using localized timestamps in a timezone with a DST offset (I would use a fixed UTC offset timezone such as `\"Etc/GMT+3\"` to achieve that result).\r\n\r\nNote that pandas 0.23 *does* have the behavior I expect for New York timezone, for instance:\r\n\r\n```\r\npd.date_range(start='2018-03-10', end='2018-03-13', freq='D', tz=\"America/New_York\")\r\n\r\nDatetimeIndex(['2018-03-10 00:00:00-05:00', '2018-03-11 00:00:00-05:00',\r\n '2018-03-12 00:00:00-04:00', '2018-03-13 00:00:00-04:00'],\r\n dtype='datetime64[ns, America/New_York]', freq='D')\r\n```\r\n\r\nIn the example above, `1D` is *not* a synonym for 24 hours, as there is only a 23 hour interval between the timestamp on the 11th and the one on the 12th.\r\n\r\nIs the new behavior a conscious change or did this go unnoticed?"
},
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/439953593",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-439953593",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 439953593,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzOTk1MzU5Mw==",
"user": {
"login": "mroeschke",
"id": 10647082,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjEwNjQ3MDgy",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/10647082?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke",
"html_url": "https://github.com/mroeschke",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-19T16:25:58Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-19T16:25:58Z",
"author_association": "MEMBER",
"body": "In current master, the `'CD'` offset was introduced to preserve the \"1 calendar day\" behavior and `'D'` was changed to always mean 24 Hours; however, this is in the process of being reversed. https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/22867 "
},
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/440262437",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-440262437",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 440262437,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MDI2MjQzNw==",
"user": {
"login": "pierremoulinier",
"id": 7794440,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjc3OTQ0NDA=",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/7794440?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pierremoulinier",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/pierremoulinier/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-20T12:51:13Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-20T12:51:13Z",
"author_association": "NONE",
"body": "Hi Matthew, thanks for your reply above, this makes things clearer. I tried using `'CD'` on 0.24 and got the same `NonExistentTimeError` I mentionned initially.\r\n\r\n```\r\n> date_range(start='2017-10-09', end='2017-10-20', freq='CD', tz=\"America/Sao_Paulo\")\r\nTraceback (most recent call last):\r\n File \"<stdin>\", line 1, in <module>\r\n File \"/Users/github/pandas/pandas/core/indexes/datetimes.py\", line 1521, in date_range\r\n closed=closed, **kwargs)\r\n File \"/Users/github/pandas/pandas/core/indexes/datetimes.py\", line 229, in __new__\r\n closed=closed, ambiguous=ambiguous)\r\n File \"/Users/github/pandas/pandas/core/arrays/datetimes.py\", line 310, in _generate_range\r\n tz, ambiguous=ambiguous)\r\n File \"pandas/_libs/tslibs/conversion.pyx\", line 1044, in pandas._libs.tslibs.conversion.tz_localize_to_utc\r\n raise pytz.NonExistentTimeError(stamp)\r\npytz.exceptions.NonExistentTimeError: 2017-10-15 00:00:00 \r\n```\r\n\r\nI suspect the original problem was not fixed in 0.24 but only hidden by the 'Day' vs 'Calendar Day' behavior change. I think issue will reappear when reverting this behavior change unless it is addressed in PR #22867 \r\n\r\nWhat's the best way to track this? Should we re-open this issue?\r\n\r\n"
},
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/comments/440337737",
"html_url": "https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742#issuecomment-440337737",
"issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/23742",
"id": 440337737,
"node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MDMzNzczNw==",
"user": {
"login": "mroeschke",
"id": 10647082,
"node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjEwNjQ3MDgy",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/10647082?v=4",
"gravatar_id": "",
"url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke",
"html_url": "https://github.com/mroeschke",
"followers_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/followers",
"following_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/following{/other_user}",
"gists_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/gists{/gist_id}",
"starred_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/starred{/owner}{/repo}",
"subscriptions_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/subscriptions",
"organizations_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/orgs",
"repos_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/repos",
"events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/events{/privacy}",
"received_events_url": "https://api.github.com/users/mroeschke/received_events",
"type": "User",
"site_admin": false
},
"created_at": "2018-11-20T16:31:37Z",
"updated_at": "2018-11-20T16:31:37Z",
"author_association": "MEMBER",
"body": "Thanks for the example. A `nonexistent` keyword argument was added recently in `tz_localize` that can help solve this problem.\r\n\r\n```\r\ndate_range(start='2017-10-09', end='2017-10-20', freq='CD').tz_localize(\"America/Sao_Paulo\", nonexistent='shift')\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe `tz` kwarg is similar to `tz_localize` except it lacks the error handling kwargs of ambiguous or nonexistent times and therefore does not make any assumptions of how to handle these times.."
}
]
|
{
"id": 120812,
"rating": 879,
"attempts": 808,
"fen": "r1bqk2r/pp1ppp1p/5bp1/1B6/3pP3/3P4/PPP2PPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - 0 9",
"color": "black",
"initialPly": 17,
"gameId": "I6Z9AL7z",
"lines": {
"d8a5": {
"d1d2": {
"a5b5": {
"e1c1": "win"
}
}
}
},
"vote": 24,
"enabled": true
} |
{"name":"left","subject":1000,"date":"2122009-093825","paths":{"Pen":{"strokes":[{"x":601,"y":-411,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":0,"stroke_id":0},{"x":620,"y":-402,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":1,"stroke_id":0},{"x":634,"y":-396,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":2,"stroke_id":0},{"x":645,"y":-381,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":3,"stroke_id":0},{"x":645,"y":-381,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":4,"stroke_id":0},{"x":650,"y":-371,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":5,"stroke_id":0},{"x":637,"y":-370,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":6,"stroke_id":0},{"x":622,"y":-358,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":7,"stroke_id":0},{"x":587,"y":-354,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":8,"stroke_id":0},{"x":541,"y":-343,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":9,"stroke_id":0},{"x":475,"y":-331,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":10,"stroke_id":0},{"x":396,"y":-317,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":11,"stroke_id":0},{"x":296,"y":-299,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":12,"stroke_id":0},{"x":184,"y":-283,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":13,"stroke_id":0},{"x":63,"y":-267,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":14,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-69,"y":-252,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":15,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-203,"y":-237,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":16,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-340,"y":-224,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":17,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-470,"y":-216,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":18,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-593,"y":-205,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":19,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-709,"y":-199,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":20,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-812,"y":-193,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":21,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-904,"y":-189,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":22,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-984,"y":-185,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":23,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1048,"y":-183,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":24,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1096,"y":-182,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":25,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1134,"y":-178,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":26,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1157,"y":-181,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":27,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1169,"y":-177,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":28,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1169,"y":-177,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":29,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1159,"y":-174,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":30,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1159,"y":-174,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":31,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1126,"y":-173,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":32,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1104,"y":-172,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":33,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1076,"y":-169,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":34,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1051,"y":-167,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":35,"stroke_id":0},{"x":-1023,"y":-169,"w":null,"z":null,"alpha":null,"beta":null,"gamma":null,"t":36,"stroke_id":0}]}},"device":{"osBrowserInfo":"Fujitsu-Siemens Lenovo X61 Tablet PC","resolutionHeight":null,"resolutionWidth":null,"windowHeight":null,"windowWidth":null,"pixelRatio":null,"mouse":false,"pen":true,"finger":false,"acceleration":false,"webcam":false}} |
{"jquery.textcomplete.css":"sha512-kCBqPj6XOEwB596PwxSOXfZijRh7MXC827jrIOJPcrBJFDJAV9rcvfjU88yqz861PaprUUYgCTwYasEYNA8zFw==","jquery.textcomplete.js":"sha512-whk8YzCdr58Aji9yBQWGkHGLg73sR2nHRLvUip6uXLu0r5L5kXMBElQdG7ZLWNpoC8WTlqt+QPKNbJQfOzxEiw==","jquery.textcomplete.min.css":"sha512-G1yq+FHkTmL39nr+9EsF23rWfZEhIgXcz2RZM0GwEiPmttym2Z0ZDyqyyLDJd2L1E5QmGKnnscI6BXYVKaUeGA==","jquery.textcomplete.min.js":"sha512-YZuJ5g7hPcN+wKAKnVX5I+zq7Ljobv+kWQQGgQhfNRMRZJfoJ4FfhACZz9/6ElkMgzV3uG0xP+59aaeiATr7mw=="} |
{"author":"Pawel_Pediv","questions":[{"type":"quiz","question":"The train __________ (to arrive) at 12:30.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"arrives","correct":true},{"answer":"is going to arrive","correct":false},{"answer":"will arrive","correct":false},{"answer":"is arriving","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"We __________ (to have) dinner at a seaside restaurant on Sunday. Do you want to come?","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"have","correct":false},{"answer":"are going to have","correct":true},{"answer":"are having","correct":true},{"answer":"will have","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"It __________(to snow) in Brighton tomorrow evening.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"snowing","correct":false},{"answer":"snows","correct":false},{"answer":"will snow","correct":true},{"answer":"is going to snow","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"On Friday at 8 o’clock I __________ (to meet) my friend.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"am meeting","correct":true},{"answer":"meet","correct":false},{"answer":"am going to meet","correct":true},{"answer":"will meet","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"Paul __________ (to fly) to London on Monday morning.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"will fy","correct":false},{"answer":"is flying","correct":true},{"answer":"flies","correct":false},{"answer":"is going to fly","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"Wait! I __________ (to drive) you to the station.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"am driving","correct":false},{"answer":"am going to drive","correct":false},{"answer":"will drive","correct":true},{"answer":"drive","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"The English lesson __________ (to start) at 8:45.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"is going to start","correct":false},{"answer":"will start","correct":false},{"answer":"is starting","correct":false},{"answer":"starts","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"Are you still writing your essay? If you __________ (to finish) by 4pm, we can go for a walk.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"finish","correct":true},{"answer":"will finish","correct":false},{"answer":"finish up","correct":true},{"answer":"are going to finish","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"I __________ (to see) my mother in April.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"am going to see","correct":true},{"answer":"will see","correct":false},{"answer":"see","correct":false},{"answer":"am seeing","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"Look at the clouds – it __________ (to rain) in a few minutes.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"will rains","correct":false},{"answer":"will rain","correct":true},{"answer":"is going to stop raining","correct":false},{"answer":"is going to rain","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"You’re carrying too much. I __________ (to open) the door for you.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"open","correct":false},{"answer":"am opening","correct":false},{"answer":"will open","correct":true},{"answer":"am going to open","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"When I __________ (to see) you tomorrow, I __________ (show) you my new book.","time":30000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"see + will show","correct":true},{"answer":"see + am going to show","correct":false},{"answer":"will see + show","correct":false},{"answer":"will see + will show","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"After you __________ (to take) a nap, you __________ (to feel) a lot better","time":30000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"will take + are going to feel","correct":false},{"answer":"take + are going to feel","correct":false},{"answer":"will take + will feel","correct":false},{"answer":"take + will feel","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"I’m sorry but you need to stay at school until you __________ (to finish) your test.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"finish up","correct":true},{"answer":"will finish","correct":false},{"answer":"finish","correct":true},{"answer":"are going to finish","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"I __________ (to buy) the milk from the corner shop when it __________ (to open).","time":30000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"will buy + is smashed by giantic pink unicorn","correct":false},{"answer":"will buy + will open","correct":false},{"answer":"will buy + opens","correct":true},{"answer":"will buy + is open","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"Before we __________ (to start) our lesson, we __________ (to have) a review.","time":30000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"start + will have","correct":true},{"answer":"start + are going to have","correct":true},{"answer":"are starting + are going to have","correct":false},{"answer":"are starting + are having","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"We __________ (to wait) in the shelter until the bus __________ (to come).","time":30000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"are going to wait + will arrive","correct":false},{"answer":"are going to wait + arrives","correct":false},{"answer":"will wait + is going to arrive","correct":false},{"answer":"will wait + arrives","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"I’m very sorry Dr. Jones __________ (not be) back in the clinic until 2pm.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"is not going to be","correct":false},{"answer":"won't","correct":true},{"answer":"is not","correct":false},{"answer":"will not","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"I don’t think you __________ (to have) any problems when you land in Boston.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"are going to have","correct":true},{"answer":"have","correct":false},{"answer":"are having","correct":false},{"answer":"will have","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"In three years I __________ (to live) in a different country.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"live","correct":false},{"answer":"am going to live","correct":true},{"answer":"will live","correct":true},{"answer":"am living","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"When you _________ (to get) off the train, I _________ (to wait) for you by the ticket machine.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"get + am going to wait","correct":false},{"answer":"get + will be waiting","correct":true},{"answer":"will get + am going to wait","correct":false},{"answer":"will get + will be waiting","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"__________ (to take) your Darth Vader outfit with you for a trip the mountains?","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"Are you going to take","correct":true},{"answer":"Will you take","correct":true},{"answer":"Do you take","correct":false},{"answer":"Are you taking","correct":false}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"This time next week I __________ (ski) in Switzerland!","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"am skiing","correct":false},{"answer":"am going to be skiing","correct":false},{"answer":"ski","correct":false},{"answer":"will be skiing","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0},{"type":"quiz","question":"Now I __________ (to check) my answers.","time":20000,"points":true,"pointsMultiplier":1,"choices":[{"answer":"am going to check","correct":true},{"answer":"will check","correct":true},{"answer":"check","correct":false},{"answer":"am checking","correct":true}],"image":"","resources":"","video":{"id":"","startTime":0,"endTime":0,"service":"youtube","fullUrl":""},"questionFormat":0}],"answerMap":[4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4],"uuid":"41521cf0-97c5-4736-a434-236fa6218c46"} |
"200802\n当大地覆盖一层白茫茫的雪\n我看见 大地比天空更亮\n我现在才明白 大地也可以还天空一个情\n既然你帮过别人驱赶黑暗\n我站在人性的至高点 带着大地的白\n心甘情愿为你行走的路当一次灯\n平缓你的无助 也帮你寻找世界上最亮的\n那颗星星 在这个冬天 好为你发光发热" |
{
"first_traded_price": 1.36e4,
"highest_price": 1.36e4,
"isin": "IRO7RAZP0001",
"last_traded_price": 1.3e4,
"lowest_price": 12175.0,
"trade_volume": 2129699.0,
"unix_time": 1561248000
} |
{
"files": {
"src/cmd/cc/cc.h": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 3,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 3,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4042,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5c/swt.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 3,
"num_removed": 4,
"id": 4028,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5l/asm.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 3,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 4,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4033,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/cc/dpchk.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 2,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 11,
"num_removed": 7,
"id": 4044,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/cc/lexbody": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 7,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4045,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/pkg/runtime/malloc.goc": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 2,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4051,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/6l/obj.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 2,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 7,
"num_removed": 3,
"id": 4039,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5g/gg.h": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 0,
"num_removed": 1,
"id": 4030,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/cc/macbody": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 4,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4046,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/pkg/runtime/mgc0.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 2,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 2,
"num_removed": 5,
"id": 4052,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5l/l.h": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 0,
"num_removed": 1,
"id": 4034,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5g/gsubr.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 2,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 3,
"num_removed": 3,
"id": 4032,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/ld/symtab.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 4,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4049,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/6c/txt.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 2,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4037,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/8c/txt.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 2,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4040,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/ld/lib.h": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 1,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4048,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5g/gobj.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 0,
"num_removed": 1,
"id": 4031,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/cc/dcl.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 4,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4043,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5a/lex.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 0,
"num_removed": 1,
"id": 4027,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5c/txt.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 2,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4029,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/ld/data.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 7,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 34,
"num_removed": 8,
"id": 4047,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5l/span.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 2,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4036,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/5l/obj.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 3,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 8,
"num_removed": 5,
"id": 4035,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/libmach/5obj.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 1,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 1,
"num_removed": 1,
"id": 4050,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/6l/asm.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 4,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 4,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4038,
"is_binary": false
},
"src/cmd/8l/asm.c": {
"status": "M",
"num_chunks": 3,
"no_base_file": false,
"property_changes": "",
"num_added": 4,
"num_removed": 0,
"id": 4041,
"is_binary": false
}
},
"url": null,
"created": "2012-02-21 21:41:59.993896",
"owner": "rsc",
"num_comments": 2,
"patchset": 5001,
"owner_email": "rsc@golang.org",
"issue": 5686060,
"message": "diff -r 852dfc2a4fc8 https://go.googlecode.com/hg/",
"modified": "2012-02-21 23:24:11.889191"
} |
{"username": "user10", "additional_items": [], "items": {"1": "negative", "3": "negative", "2": "negative"}, "tweet_id": "578689371672571904", "timespent": 6.435840845108, "starttime": 1429798895.9864, "itemcount": "3", "savingtime": 1429798902.4222} |
{"artist": "Edge of Sanity", "timestamp": "2011-08-03 09:14:15.291840", "similars": [], "tags": [["Melodic Death Metal", "100"], ["cover", "50"], ["progressive death metal", "50"], ["The Police cover", "50"], ["metal", "25"], ["Progressive", "25"], ["Progressive metal", "25"], ["death metal", "25"], ["awesome cover", "25"], ["Coversong", "25"], ["metal cover", "25"], ["Edge Of Sanity", "25"]], "track_id": "TRSGDFW12903CDB1C2", "title": "Invisible Sun"} |
{"title":"Katja Kassin - All Up In That Ass (This is why im her fan...)","uid":5673101,"size":197017741,"categoryP":"other","categoryS":"other","magnet":"?xt=urn:btih:52d964b087504aca2ee87c1990bcfdb1233585dc&dn=Katja+Kassin+-+All+Up+In+That+Ass+%28This+is+why+im+her+fan...%29&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969","seeders":0,"leechers":1,"uploader":"dias_vld","files":5,"time":1278428426,"description":"HEre´s Katja Kassin at her best...this scene is one of those to keep for a quick one or to tease ur woman...PERFECT stuff here...:D\n\nScreens: <a href="\nhttp://www.pixsor.com/share-28A3_4C332516.html" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://www.pixsor.com/share-28A3_4C332516.html</a>\n\n\n\nAlso in this torrent a preview clip of Bailey Brooks at Facial Abuse.\n\nScreens: <a href="\nhttp://www.pixsor.com/share-5AC0_4C332516.html" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://www.pixsor.com/share-5AC0_4C332516.html</a>\n\n <a href="\nhttp://www.facialabuse.com/dias" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://www.facialabuse.com/dias</a> and get a special $10month discount.\nFor more free extreme porn, check out http://www.defaceherface.com and http://www.abusedtube.com\n\n\nWatch my list of great porn...mostly rough stuff!! :)\n <a href="\nhttp://thepiratebay.se/user/dias_vld/" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://thepiratebay.se/user/dias_vld/</a>","torrent":{"xt":"urn:btih:52d964b087504aca2ee87c1990bcfdb1233585dc","amp;dn":"Katja+Kassin+-+All+Up+In+That+Ass+%28This+is+why+im+her+fan...%29","amp;tr":["udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80","udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337","udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969","udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969"],"infoHash":"52d964b087504aca2ee87c1990bcfdb1233585dc","infoHashBuffer":{"type":"Buffer","data":[82,217,100,176,135,80,74,202,46,232,124,25,144,188,253,177,35,53,133,220]},"announce":[],"urlList":[]}} |
{"name":"RazeTheWorld","permalink":"razetheworld","crunchbase_url":"http://www.crunchbase.com/company/razetheworld","homepage_url":"http://razetheworld.com","blog_url":"http://razetheworld.com","blog_feed_url":"http://razetheworld.com/blog/feed/","twitter_username":"raze_the_world","category_code":"games_video","number_of_employees":6,"founded_year":2008,"founded_month":6,"founded_day":null,"deadpooled_year":null,"deadpooled_month":null,"deadpooled_day":null,"deadpooled_url":null,"tag_list":"razetheworld, raze-the-world, gaming-website, pc-gaming, games, hardware, grapbhics-cards, cpu, gaming-community, gaming-forum, pc-forum, hardware-forum, raze, the, world, rtw","alias_list":null,"email_address":"Info@razetheworld.com","phone_number":"","description":"","created_at":"Tue Jan 06 20:00:57 UTC 2009","updated_at":"Sun Nov 14 00:59:52 UTC 2010","overview":"<p><a href=\"http://www.razetheworld.com\" title=\"RazeTheWorld\" rel=\"nofollow\">RazeTheWorld</a> is an online PC gaming and hardware oriented blog and community. </p>\n\n<p>The website was founded by Logan back in June of 2008, containing a blog where news is posted, and a forum consisting of thousands of users. Since then, the site has expanded exponentially, moving to other areas of entertainment, such as game events, live streaming, and online video.</p>\n\n<p>RazeTheWorld features two groups of blogs. A main blog, where official writers maintain their standpoint on games or hardware, talk about current events, or post current news regarding the industry. RazeTheWorld also features a Community Blog, where any member of the community can voice their opinion in the form of a news article, blog, or rant. </p>\n\n<p>RazeTheWorld utilizes youtube as a means of relaying additional news as and general wackiness to the masses on their <a href=\"http://www.youtube.com/razethew0rld\" title=\"channel\" rel=\"nofollow\">channel</a>. Most of the videos consist of news, gameplay videos of upcoming or newly released games for PC, or other general nonsense.</p>\n\n<p>Part of what makes RazeTheWorld special is their intent to drift as far away from other gaming websites, making it a unique community, where users can voice their opinions and debate on different things in areas other websites fear to tread. The writing style of the authors often make the blogs or videos informative, yet fun and entertaining.</p>\n\n<p>RazeTheWorld also features several game servers for PC games, hosting weekly or bi-weekly “events” in which members of the community put their skills to the test with site moderators and other community members in games like Team Fortress 2, and Counter Strike: Source.</p>","image":{"available_sizes":[[[117,150],"assets/images/resized/0003/3197/33197v2-max-150x150.jpg"],[[196,250],"assets/images/resized/0003/3197/33197v2-max-250x250.jpg"],[[267,340],"assets/images/resized/0003/3197/33197v2-max-450x450.jpg"]],"attribution":null},"products":[],"relationships":[{"is_past":false,"title":"Founder","person":{"first_name":"Logan","last_name":"Hale","permalink":"logan-hale","image":{"available_sizes":[[[127,150],"assets/images/resized/0003/3198/33198v4-max-150x150.jpg"],[[211,250],"assets/images/resized/0003/3198/33198v4-max-250x250.jpg"],[[381,450],"assets/images/resized/0003/3198/33198v4-max-450x450.jpg"]],"attribution":"<p>Logan</p>"}}}],"competitions":[{"competitor":{"name":"Com.puter.Tv Forums","permalink":"com-puter-tv-forums","image":null}}],"providerships":[],"total_money_raised":"$0","funding_rounds":[],"investments":[],"acquisition":null,"acquisitions":[],"offices":[],"milestones":[],"ipo":null,"video_embeds":[],"screenshots":[{"available_sizes":[[[150,145],"assets/images/resized/0005/4113/54113v2-max-150x150.jpg"],[[250,241],"assets/images/resized/0005/4113/54113v2-max-250x250.jpg"],[[450,435],"assets/images/resized/0005/4113/54113v2-max-450x450.jpg"]],"attribution":null},{"available_sizes":[[[128,150],"assets/images/resized/0005/4128/54128v2-max-150x150.png"],[[213,250],"assets/images/resized/0005/4128/54128v2-max-250x250.png"],[[384,450],"assets/images/resized/0005/4128/54128v2-max-450x450.png"]],"attribution":null}],"external_links":[]} |
{
"first_traded_price": 4580.0,
"highest_price": 4580.0,
"isin": "IRO7GAZP0001",
"last_traded_price": 4.4e3,
"lowest_price": 4390.0,
"trade_volume": 182854.0,
"unix_time": 1512864000
} |
{
"thing" : [
{
"yyyy" : 2019,
"mm" : "Sep",
"dd" : 16,
"image": "./img/news-2.2.jpg",
"title": "國旅秋冬補助夜市抵用券",
"detail": "即日起至領完為止"
},{
"yyyy" : 2019,
"mm" : "Sep",
"dd" : 1,
"image": "./img/news-1.2.jpg",
"title": "觀光局擴大國旅秋冬補助活動開跑",
"detail": "即日起至2019.12.31"
},{
"yyyy" : 2019,
"mm" : "Sep",
"dd" : 16,
"image": "./img/news-2.2.jpg",
"title": "國旅秋冬補助夜市抵用券",
"detail": "即日起至領完為止"
},{
"yyyy" : 2019,
"mm" : "Sep",
"dd" : 16,
"image": "./img/news-2.2.jpg",
"title": "國旅秋冬補助夜市抵用券",
"detail": "即日起至領完為止"
},{
"yyyy" : 2019,
"mm" : "Sep",
"dd" : 16,
"image": "./img/news-2.2.jpg",
"title": "國旅秋冬補助夜市抵用券",
"detail": "即日起至領完為止"
},{
"yyyy" : 2019,
"mm" : "Sep",
"dd" : 16,
"image": "./img/news-2.2.jpg",
"title": "國旅秋冬補助夜市抵用券",
"detail": "即日起至領完為止"
}
]
} |
[
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TblDKND367k/TmtHnaql4VI/AAAAAAAACL0/_FF5TAzg6rA/s0/000.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RIgEXHiel3c/TmtHokwC1_I/AAAAAAAACME/M8tqUTWc37s/s0/001.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SiPHu-G-Ajk/TmtHpwUyqAI/AAAAAAAACMk/gXqDTIUFmVA/s0/002.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-MQhqmIlTwco/TmtHugQvU7I/AAAAAAAACNU/_lgJdoDU5V0/s0/003.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-KG9fJEsmXAM/TmtHypYBsXI/AAAAAAAACNo/VGe4Tt-yFdg/s0/004.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C-ozBTDxftM/TmtH0PcwUuI/AAAAAAAACOA/hcJtz-jC61Q/s0/005.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xEj1rFXCc2A/TmtH1l22qkI/AAAAAAAACOc/NF7AU08hghg/s0/006.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YqkZA-yfN2Y/TmtH23GqtbI/AAAAAAAACO4/pCOW0q-kSp8/s0/007.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3BxFSPXyGSI/TmtH4V-CzXI/AAAAAAAACPs/lb26IOhWPsY/s0/008.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-88Q7pcUGEts/TmtH-uRUvzI/AAAAAAAACQA/yjQEVPLXdOw/s0/009.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9fsxTIwv2Q4/TmtIBB7f97I/AAAAAAAACQ4/6SO8p0Hk6Ug/s0/010.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0yE5BS6qYSs/TmtICVK8uqI/AAAAAAAACRQ/yut1b2W4B8w/s0/011.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Tjq44aSiRV4/TmtIDeGDCiI/AAAAAAAACRw/ei5dDUSqJIs/s0/012.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1ZQN0AxGNDE/TmtIFe22KKI/AAAAAAAACSI/MmX4fNhJlJ8/s0/013.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4MnRIcPv43U/TmtIGlrbR8I/AAAAAAAACSo/IN_i4Xx1U-w/s0/014.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wGGfofDHj3I/TmtIIoEQIoI/AAAAAAAACTA/6TMvgL_wvT4/s0/015.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-JqS5Oc3m3fU/TmtIJgbTwxI/AAAAAAAACTU/9aOFuZe4qmA/s0/016.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AouG2MOG9Ro/TmtIKSzkoCI/AAAAAAAACTs/T0kn41xRQtY/s0/017.jpg"
] |
"\n在重庆，我经常爬坡上坎，薄了公交\n轻了红灯，越界时，相戚时\n习惯了投币，大声诵读楚王\n从长江升起，汉武士从图书馆\n檐角落下，\n在木桶浴与水煮活鱼流行的时代，\n我也习惯了从身上溢出功德——\n地铁口弯腰，投截肢者一别\n血车上伸手，投白衣秀士一笑\n森林里换下猎装，投火烈鸟\n一声唤，唉\n在重庆，线装书如装订严密的人心\n古籍与盲马都在天鹅桥上游弋\n而轻雾，而轻雾，而轻雾每天拢起日头，\n我，\n我，我\n我，我，我，\n我，我，我，我\n像个仰头落泪的罪人" |
{
"order": "55557"
,"word": "corneas"
,"count": "28"
}
|
[
{
"inputs": [
{ "internalType": "address", "name": "_weth", "type": "address" },
{ "internalType": "address", "name": "_uniFactory", "type": "address" },
{
"internalType": "contract IUniswapV2Router02",
"name": "_uniRouter",
"type": "address"
},
{ "internalType": "address", "name": "_sushiFactory", "type": "address" },
{
"internalType": "contract IUniswapV2Router02",
"name": "_sushiRouter",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "contract IController",
"name": "_setController",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "contract IBasicIssuanceModule",
"name": "_basicIssuanceModule",
"type": "address"
}
],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "constructor"
},
{
"anonymous": false,
"inputs": [
{
"indexed": true,
"internalType": "address",
"name": "_recipient",
"type": "address"
},
{
"indexed": true,
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"indexed": true,
"internalType": "contract IERC20",
"name": "_inputToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"indexed": false,
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountInputToken",
"type": "uint256"
},
{
"indexed": false,
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountSetIssued",
"type": "uint256"
}
],
"name": "ExchangeIssue",
"type": "event"
},
{
"anonymous": false,
"inputs": [
{
"indexed": true,
"internalType": "address",
"name": "_recipient",
"type": "address"
},
{
"indexed": true,
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"indexed": true,
"internalType": "contract IERC20",
"name": "_outputToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"indexed": false,
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountSetRedeemed",
"type": "uint256"
},
{
"indexed": false,
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountOutputToken",
"type": "uint256"
}
],
"name": "ExchangeRedeem",
"type": "event"
},
{
"anonymous": false,
"inputs": [
{
"indexed": true,
"internalType": "address",
"name": "_recipient",
"type": "address"
},
{
"indexed": false,
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_refundAmount",
"type": "uint256"
}
],
"name": "Refund",
"type": "event"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "ETH_ADDRESS",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "address", "name": "", "type": "address" }],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "WETH",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "address", "name": "", "type": "address" }],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
}
],
"name": "approveSetToken",
"outputs": [],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{ "internalType": "contract IERC20", "name": "_token", "type": "address" }
],
"name": "approveToken",
"outputs": [],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract IERC20[]",
"name": "_tokens",
"type": "address[]"
}
],
"name": "approveTokens",
"outputs": [],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "basicIssuanceModule",
"outputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract IBasicIssuanceModule",
"name": "",
"type": "address"
}
],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "contract IERC20",
"name": "_inputToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountSetToken",
"type": "uint256"
}
],
"name": "getAmountInToIssueExactSet",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "", "type": "uint256" }],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{ "internalType": "address", "name": "_outputToken", "type": "address" },
{
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountSetToken",
"type": "uint256"
}
],
"name": "getAmountOutOnRedeemSet",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "", "type": "uint256" }],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "contract IERC20",
"name": "_inputToken",
"type": "address"
},
{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "_amountInput", "type": "uint256" }
],
"name": "getEstimatedIssueSetAmount",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "", "type": "uint256" }],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "contract IERC20",
"name": "_inputToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountSetToken",
"type": "uint256"
},
{
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_maxAmountInputToken",
"type": "uint256"
}
],
"name": "issueExactSetFromToken",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "", "type": "uint256" }],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "contract IERC20",
"name": "_inputToken",
"type": "address"
},
{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "_amountInput", "type": "uint256" },
{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "_minSetReceive", "type": "uint256" }
],
"name": "issueSetForExactToken",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "", "type": "uint256" }],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract ISetToken",
"name": "_setToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "contract IERC20",
"name": "_outputToken",
"type": "address"
},
{
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_amountSetToken",
"type": "uint256"
},
{
"internalType": "uint256",
"name": "_minOutputReceive",
"type": "uint256"
}
],
"name": "redeemExactSetForToken",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "uint256", "name": "", "type": "uint256" }],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "setController",
"outputs": [
{ "internalType": "contract IController", "name": "", "type": "address" }
],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "sushiFactory",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "address", "name": "", "type": "address" }],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "sushiRouter",
"outputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract IUniswapV2Router02",
"name": "",
"type": "address"
}
],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "uniFactory",
"outputs": [{ "internalType": "address", "name": "", "type": "address" }],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [],
"name": "uniRouter",
"outputs": [
{
"internalType": "contract IUniswapV2Router02",
"name": "",
"type": "address"
}
],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
}
]
|
{
"first_traded_price": 2964.0,
"highest_price": 2970.0,
"isin": "IRO1LMIR0001",
"last_traded_price": 2964.0,
"lowest_price": 2964.0,
"trade_volume": 11762.0,
"unix_time": 1281744000
} |
{
"name": "andreas-test",
"version": "5.2.0",
"description": "A starter Next.js project",
"author": "Fadi quader",
"license": "ISC",
"main": "index.js",
"dependencies": {
"antd": "^3.2.0",
"autoprefixer": "^7.2.6",
"axios": "^0.18.0",
"babel-core": "^6.26.0",
"babel-loader": "^7.1.2",
"babel-plugin-wrap-in-js": "^1.1.1",
"connect-mongo": "^2.0.1",
"cookie-parser": "^1.4.3",
"cookie-session": "^2.0.0-beta.3",
"css-loader": "^0.28.9",
"dotenv": "^5.0.0",
"express": "^4.16.2",
"express-session": "^1.15.6",
"intl": "^1.2.5",
"isomorphic-fetch": "^2.2.1",
"less": "^2.7.3",
"less-loader": "^4.0.5",
"lusca": "^1.5.2",
"mobx": "^3.5.1",
"mobx-react": "^4.4.2",
"mobx-state-tree": "^1.3.1",
"next": "^5.0.0",
"nprogress": "^0.2.0",
"passport": "^0.4.0",
"passport-facebook": "^2.1.1",
"passport-google-oauth": "^1.0.0",
"passport-local": "^1.0.0",
"passport-twitter": "^1.0.4",
"popper.js": "^1.12.3",
"raw-loader": "^0.5.1",
"react": "^16.2.0",
"react-dom": "^16.2.0",
"react-intl": "^2.4.0",
"universal-cookie": "^2.1.2"
},
"devDependencies": {
"babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node": "^1.2.0",
"babel-plugin-import": "^1.6.3",
"babel-plugin-inline-dotenv": "^1.1.2",
"babel-plugin-module-resolver": "^3.0.0",
"babel-plugin-react-intl": "^2.4.0",
"babel-plugin-transform-decorators-legacy": "^1.3.4",
"babel-plugin-transform-inline-environment-variables": "^0.3.0",
"babel-polyfill": "^6.26.0",
"babel-preset-es2015": "^6.24.1",
"babel-preset-es2016": "^6.24.1",
"babel-preset-stage-0": "^6.24.1",
"babel-preset-stage-2": "^6.24.1",
"babel-register": "^6.26.0",
"eslint": "^4.5.0",
"eslint-config-xo": "^0.18.2",
"eslint-config-xo-react": "^0.13.0",
"eslint-config-xo-space": "^0.16.0",
"eslint-plugin-react": "^7.3.0",
"extract-text-webpack-plugin": "^3.0.2",
"ignore-loader": "^0.1.2",
"mobx-devtools-mst": "^0.9.9",
"node-sass": "^4.7.2",
"postcss-cssnext": "^3.1.0",
"postcss-easy-import": "^3.0.0",
"postcss-loader": "^2.1.0",
"precss": "^3.1.0",
"sass-loader": "^6.0.6",
"style-loader": "^0.19.1",
"styled-jsx-css-loader": "^0.3.0",
"styled-jsx-plugin-sass": "^0.2.3",
"webpack": "3.10.0",
"webpack-bundle-analyzer": "^2.11.1",
"webpack-manifest-plugin": "^2.0.0-rc.2",
"xo": "^0.18.2"
},
"optionalDependencies": {
"fsevents": "*"
},
"scripts": {
"test": "xo",
"clean": "rm -rf .next/static",
"dev": "NODE_ENV=development PORT=3000 node server/bootstrap.js",
"build": "npm run clean && next build && node ./scripts/default-lang.js",
"start": "node server/bootstrap.js",
"postinstall": "next build "
},
"engines": {
"node": "7.x.x"
},
"xo": {
"space:": 2,
"semicolon": false,
"extends": [
"xo-space",
"xo-react/space"
],
"ignores": [
"next.config.js"
]
},
"now": {
"name": "nextjs-starter",
"alias": "nextjs-starter.now.sh"
}
}
|
{"name":"סמל מאיר שמעון דהן ז\"ל","date":"1/8/1982","age":"21"}
|
{
"name": "@reactorx/utils",
"version": "0.5.1",
"main": "cjs/index.js",
"module": "es/index.js",
"types": "src/index.ts",
"files": [
"src/",
"es/",
"cjs/"
],
"license": "MIT",
"dependencies": {
"@emotion/is-prop-valid": "0.7.3"
},
"publishConfig": {
"access": "public"
}
}
|
{
"first_traded_price": 1620.0,
"highest_price": 1638.0,
"isin": "IRO1MSKN0001",
"last_traded_price": 1.6e3,
"lowest_price": 1560.0,
"trade_volume": 622150.0,
"unix_time": 1436659200
} |
["54bac7f53452a36d21b6d0fd3214d4d5ce059a90"] |
{
"title": "Veggies na Praca",
"tags": [
"Veg Catering"
],
"description": "Now offering mobile trailer and catering. As of Jan 2016 its vegetarian restaurant at above the gallery at Rua Alagoas, 493 is shut/closed.",
"streetAddress": "Sao Paulo areas",
"phone": "tel:1130310680",
"listingFeatures": [
"Accepts credit cards"
],
"fb": "http://www.facebook.com/VeggiesNaPraca",
"gmaps": "http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/staticmap?center=-23.546195,-46.658970&zoom=15&size=458x118&maptype=roadmap&markers=icon:http%3A%2F%2Fgoo.gl%2F1RDrbh%7Cshadow:true%7C-23.546195,-46.658970&sensor=false&key=AIzaSyBrIo4v01Yet3zb6VunVdenxRtXWFnwfxk"
} |
[
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-B22-12dIL40/W2LkdyjQHYI/AAAAAAACHYs/xRTPMVVL-u8L4PlpFrceNFhgEOgfIZLlQCHMYCw/s0/000.png",
"https://2.bp.blogspot.com/--AUEwzdIYzs/W2LkiJmjvXI/AAAAAAACHZM/2z5JCATyCx4LajwaTF0SP76a7dgcFpRaQCHMYCw/s0/001.png"
] |
{"cacheUntil":1536405753804,"data":{"coordinates":"pkg:npm/listr-verbose-renderer@0.4.0","description":"Listr verbose renderer","reference":"https://ossindex.sonatype.org/component/pkg:npm/listr-verbose-renderer@0.4.0","vulnerabilities":[],"version":"0.4.0","name":"listr-verbose-renderer","format":"npm","depPaths":["/lint-staged/listr/listr-verbose-renderer","/np/listr/listr-verbose-renderer"]}} |
{"title":"[720p].SexoEnPublico.-.Katia.De.Lys","uid":7682347,"size":1153461248,"categoryP":"porn","categoryS":"hd___movies","magnet":"?xt=urn:btih:e7fa0d595226b7e0550132614832f202bd12e64f&dn=%5B720p%5D.SexoEnPublico.-.Katia.De.Lys&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969","seeders":1,"leechers":1,"uploader":"exmnova","files":1,"time":1348854139,"description":"[720p][SexoEnPublico./ Culioneros./ BangBros.] Katia De Lys (Huge ass gets fucked)\n\n\nWe ran into Katia, a Cuban mami with an ass that is a true work of art! Thin and with a beautiful pair of big natural tits, this chick was a fucking machine. She sucked Rober's cock on the patio of a beach house. After Rober was done fucking her, I was all hot so I jumped on her. I titty-fucked her and boned that pretty pussy hard until I couldn't stand it anymore and came in her face. Enjoy!\n\n\nScreens / More Info:\n\n\n <a href="\nhttp://www.69bits.net/torrent/HD/59002/%5B720p%5D.SexoEnPublico.-.Katia.De.Lys.html" rel="nofollow" target="_NEW">\nhttp://www.69bits.net/torrent/HD/59002/%5B720p%5D.SexoEnPublico.-.Katia.De.Lys.html</a>","torrent":{"xt":"urn:btih:e7fa0d595226b7e0550132614832f202bd12e64f","amp;dn":"%5B720p%5D.SexoEnPublico.-.Katia.De.Lys","amp;tr":["udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80","udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337","udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969","udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969"],"infoHash":"e7fa0d595226b7e0550132614832f202bd12e64f","infoHashBuffer":{"type":"Buffer","data":[231,250,13,89,82,38,183,224,85,1,50,97,72,50,242,2,189,18,230,79]},"announce":[],"urlList":[]}} |
{
"@metadata": {
"authors": [
"Amire80",
"MKaur",
"Muhammad Shuaib",
"MuratTheTurkish",
"Obaid Raza",
"Satdeep gill"
]
},
"article-action-sections": "مندرجات",
"article-action-quickfacts": "اجمالی معلومات",
"article-action-gallery": "نگارخانہ",
"article-action-languages": "زبان",
"article-action-share": "ساجھا",
"article-language-available": "{{PLURAL:$1|زبان|زبانوں}} $1 میں دستیاب",
"article-language-loading-message": "زبانیں لوڈ ہو رہی ہیں۔۔۔",
"article-loading-message": "صفحہ کھل رہا ہے۔۔۔",
"article-error-message": "مضمون لوڈ نہیں ہو سکا",
"search-loading-message": "مضامین لوڈ ہو رہے ہیں۔۔۔",
"app-title": "ویکیپیڈیا",
"app-subtitle": "آزاد دائرۃ المعارف",
"app-description": "آزاد ویکی پیڈیا ایپ کے ذریعہ پوری دنیا کی 300 سے زائد زبانوں میں معلومات تلاش کریں۔",
"content-license": "تمام مندرجات <a class=\"external\" rel=\"mw:ExtLink\" href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/\">CC BY-SA 3.0</a> کے تحت دستیاب ہیں جب تک کوئی تخصیص نہ کی گئی ہو۔",
"confirm-section": "\"$1\" میں جائیں",
"confirm-app-close-title": "ویکیپیڈیا سے باہر نکلیں؟",
"confirm-app-close-message": "کیا آپ واقعی اس اپلیکیشن کو بند کرنا چاہتے ہیں؟",
"consent-privacy-terms": "رازداری اور شرائط",
"about-header": "تعارف",
"about-wikipedia-header": "ویکیپیڈیا کا تعارف",
"gallery-description": "وضاحت",
"gallery-author-license": "مصنف اور اجازت نامہ",
"gallery-unknown-author": "نامعلوم مصنف",
"gallery-unknown-license": "نامعلوم اجازت نامہ",
"header-menu": "اختیارات",
"header-search": "تلاش کے نتائج",
"header-sections": "مندرجات",
"header-settings": "ترتیبات",
"header-textsize": "مضمون کے متن کا حجم",
"menu-previous": "پچھلا مضمون",
"menu-textsize": "متن کا حجم",
"more-information": "مزید معلومات",
"no-result-found": "کچھ نہیں ملا",
"softkey-about": "تعارف",
"softkey-more-info": "مزید معلومات",
"softkey-done": "مکمل",
"softkey-search": "تلاش کریں",
"search-language-placeholder": "زبان تلاش کریں",
"softkey-menu": "اختیارات",
"search-placeholder": "ویکیپیڈیا میں تلاش کریں",
"softkey-settings": "ترتیبات",
"centerkey-select": "منتخب کریں",
"softkey-close": "بند کریں",
"language-change": "اپلیکیشن کی زبان بدلیں",
"language-setting": "زبان کی ترتیبات",
"language-setting-message": "یہاں زبان کو تبدیل کرنے سے پوری ایپ میں زبان بدل جائے گی۔ آپ آرٹیکل مینو کا استعمال کرتے ہوئے ہر مضمون کی زبان بھی تبدیل کرسکتے ہیں۔",
"softkey-ok": "ٹھیک ہے",
"softkey-read": "پڑھیں",
"softkey-next": "آگے",
"softkey-back": "پیچھے",
"softkey-skip": "چھوڑیں",
"softkey-get-started": "شروع کریں",
"softkey-refresh": "تازہ کریں",
"softkey-tips": "سرسری اشارے",
"softkey-try": "آزمائیں",
"suggested-articles": "مجوزہ مضامین",
"reference-title": "حوالہ [$1]",
"offline-message": "انٹرنیٹ کنکشن دستیاب نہیں",
"onboarding-0-title": "ویکیپیڈیا کا تعارف",
"onboarding-0-description": "ویکیپیڈیا علم کا مفت ذریعہ ہے جو پوری دنیا کے رضاکاروں کے باہمی تعاون سے لکھا گیا ہے۔",
"onboarding-1-title": "سینکڑوں زبانوں ميں تلاش کریں",
"onboarding-1-description": "تلاش کرنے اور پڑھنے کے لیے اپنی پسند کی زبان یا زبانیں منتخب کریں۔",
"onboarding-2-title": "مفت علم پائیں",
"onboarding-2-description": "دنیا بھر سے شخصیات، مقامات اور اشیا کے بارے میں 50 ملین سے زیادہ مضامین پڑھیں۔ تازہ ترین معلومات اور نئے مضامین باقاعدگی سے شامل کیے جاتے ہیں۔",
"settings-language": "زبانیں",
"settings-textsize": "متن کا حجم",
"settings-about-wikipedia": "ویکیپیڈیا کا تعارف",
"settings-privacy": "اخفائے راز کے اصول",
"settings-term": "استعمال کے شرائط",
"settings-rate": "ایپ کو ریٹ کریں",
"settings-help-feedback": "اپنے تاثرات بھیجیں",
"settings-about-app": "ایپ کا تعارف",
"textsize-preview": "مضمون کا متن یوں دکھائی دے گا۔",
"textsize-label-small": "چھوٹا",
"textsize-label-large": "بڑا",
"tips-header": "سرسری اشارے",
"tips-read": "مضمون کس طرح پڑھیں؟",
"tips-search": "کسی مضمون کو کیسے تلاش کریں؟",
"tips-switch": "روابط کیسے تبدیل کریں؟",
"tips-about": "ویکیپیڈیا کیا ہے؟",
"tip-read-header": "مضمون پڑھیں",
"tip-read-message": "مختلف زبانوں میں مضامین پڑھنے، نگارخانہ دیکھنے وغیرہ امور کے لیے فوری روابط یا کلید اختیارات کا استعمال کریں۔",
"tip-search-header": "تلاش کریں",
"tip-search-message": "دنیا بھر کی شخصیات، مقامات اور دیگر اشیا کے متعلق مضامین پڑھنا چاہتے ہیں تو انھیں تلاش کے خانہ میں لکھ کر تلاش کریں۔",
"tip-switch-header": "روابط بدلیں",
"tip-switch-message": "اپنی معلومات میں اضافہ کے لیے مضمون میں موجود روابط کو منتخب کریں۔ اس کے لیے دائیں یا بائیں کلید کا استعمال کیا جائے۔",
"tip-about-header": "ویکیپیڈیا کا تعارف",
"tip-about-message": "ویکیپیڈیا آزاد اور مفت معلومات کا گنجینہ ہے جسے پوری دنیا کے رضاکاروں کے باہمی تعاون سے تیار کیا گیا ہے۔",
"toc-footer": "مجوزہ مضامین",
"view-in-browser": "مضمون کو برائزر میں دیکھیں",
"about-app-message": "اسے ویکیمیڈیا فاؤنڈیشن نے آپ جیسے رضاکاروں کی مدد سے تیار کیا ہے۔",
"softkey-read-more": "مزید پڑھیں",
"feed-header": "مقبول صفحات",
"feed-error-message": "مقبول صفحات لوڈ نہیں ہو سکے",
"feedback-header": "اپنے تاثرات بھیجیں",
"feedback-explanation": "ایپ کی مزید اصلاح و تحسین میں آپ کے تاثرات ہمارے معاون ہوں گے۔ یہ تاثرات 90 دن تک موجود رہیں گے اور ہمارے $1 اور $2 کے تحت ہوں گے۔",
"feedback-placeholder": "یہاں لکھنا شروع کریں۔۔۔",
"feedback-success": "آپ کے تاثرات کا شکریہ!",
"feedback-success-header": "تاثرات بھیج دیے گئے",
"feedback-terms-of-survey": "سروے اسٹیٹمنٹ کی شرائط",
"feedback-privacy-policy": "اخفائے راز کے اصول",
"feedback-terms-of-use": "استعمال کی شرائط",
"softkey-send": "روانہ کریں",
"softkey-cancel": "منسوخ",
"softkey-exit": "خارج ہوں",
"feedback-cancel": "کیا آپ واقعی چھوڑنا چاہتے ہیں؟ ایسا کرنے سے آپ کے تاثرات ضائع ہو جائیں گے",
"feedback-cancel-header": "رد کریں",
"softkey-yes": "ہاں",
"softkey-no": "نہیں",
"settings-privacy-terms": "رازداری اور شرائط",
"privacy-terms-header": "رازداری اور شرائط"
}
|
[
{
"titel_s": "Prof. Dr. Ing.",
"vorname_s": "Hans Dieter",
"lehrgebiet_s": "Informatik",
"name_s": "Beims"
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
},
{
"titel_s": "",
"vorname_s": "",
"lehrgebiet_s": "",
"name_s": ""
}
] |
{
"order": "13543"
,"word": "chevy"
,"count": "318"
}
|
{ "customSettings" : { "gaid" : [ "UA-157544742-1" ], "datacore" : { "user" : "TR4CKUL", "token" : "4ci7ap7tobk4CI7AP80HLA4ci7ap80gv6FNF4O4EG9V" }, "airlineName" : "SriLankan Airlines" } } |
Pays Capitale
Afrique du Sud Pretoria
Afghanistan Kaboul
Albanie Tirana
Algérie Alger
Allemagne Berlin
Andorre Andorre-la-Vieille
Angola Luanda
Antigua-et-Barbuda Saint John’s
Arabie Saoudite Riyad
Argentine Buenos Aires
Arménie Erevan
Australie Canberra
Autriche Vienne
Azerbaïdjan Bakou
Bahamas Nassau
Bahreïn Manama
Bangladesh Dacca
Barbade Bridgetown
Belgique Bruxelles
Belize Belmopan
Bénin Porto-Novo
Bhoutan Thimphou
Biélorussie Minsk
Birmanie Naypyidaw
Bolivie Sucre
Bosnie-Herzégovine Sarajevo
Botswana Gaborone
Brésil Brasilia
Brunei Bandar Seri Begawan
Bulgarie Sofia
Burkina Faso Ouagadougou
Burundi Gitega
Cambodge Phnom Penh
Cameroun Yaoundé
Canada Ottawa
Cap-Vert Praia
Chili Santiago
Chine Pékin
Chypre Nicosie
Colombie Bogota
Comores Moroni
Corée du Nord Pyongyang
Corée du Sud Séoul
Costa Rica San José
Côte d’Ivoire Yamoussoukro
Croatie Zagreb
Cuba La Havane
Danemark Copenhague
Djibouti Djibouti
Dominique Roseau
Égypte Le Caire
Émirats arabes unis Abou Dabi
Équateur Quito
Érythrée Asmara
Espagne Madrid
Eswatini Mbabane
Estonie Tallinn
États-Unis Washington
Éthiopie Addis-Abeba
Fidji Suva
Finlande Helsinki
France Paris
Gabon Libreville
Gambie Banjul
Géorgie Tbilissi
Ghana Accra
Grèce Athènes
Grenade Saint-Georges
Guatemala Guatemala
Guinée Conakry
Guinée équatoriale Malabo
Guinée-Bissau Bissau
Guyana Georgetown
Haïti Port-au-Prince
Honduras Tegucigalpa
Hongrie Budapest
Îles Cook Avarua
Îles Marshall Majuro
Inde New Delhi
Indonésie Jakarta
Irak Bagdad
Iran Téhéran
Irlande Dublin
Islande Reykjavik
Israël Jérusalem
Italie Rome
Jamaïque Kingston
Japon Tokyo
Jordanie Amman
Kazakhstan Noursoultan
Kenya Nairobi
Kirghizistan Bichkek
Kiribati Tarawa-Sud
Koweït Koweït
Laos Vientiane
Lesotho Maseru
Lettonie Riga
Liban Beyrouth
Liberia Monrovia
Libye Tripoli
Liechtenstein Vaduz
Lituanie Vilnius
Luxembourg Luxembourg
Macédoine Skopje
Madagascar Antananarivo
Malaisie Kuala Lumpur
Malawi Lilongwe
Maldives Malé
Mali Bamako
Malte La Valette
Maroc Rabat
Maurice Port-Louis
Mauritanie Nouakchott
Mexique Mexico
Micronésie Palikir
Moldavie Chișinău
Monaco Monaco
Mongolie Oulan-Bator
Monténégro Podgorica
Mozambique Maputo
Namibie Windhoek
Nauru Yaren
Népal Katmandou
Nicaragua Managua
Niger Niamey
Nigeria Abuja
Niue Alofi
Norvège Oslo
Nouvelle-Zélande Wellington
Oman Mascate
Ouganda Kampala
Ouzbékistan Tachkent
Pakistan Islamabad
Palaos Ngerulmud
Palestine Ramallah
Panama Panama
Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée Port Moresby
Paraguay Asuncion
Pays-Bas Amsterdam
Pérou Lima
Philippines Manille
Pologne Varsovie
Portugal Lisbonne
Qatar Doha
République centrafricaine Bangui
République démocratique du Congo Kinshasa
République Dominicaine Saint-Domingue
République du Congo Brazzaville
République tchèque Prague
Roumanie Bucarest
Royaume-Uni Londres
Russie Moscou
Rwanda Kigali
Saint-Kitts-et-Nevis Basseterre
Saint-Vincent-et-les-Grenadines Kingstown
Sainte-Lucie Castries
Saint-Marin Saint-Marin
Salomon Honiara
Salvador San Salvador
Samoa Apia
São Tomé-et-Principe São Tomé
Sénégal Dakar
Serbie Belgrade
Seychelles Victoria
Sierra Leone Freetown
Singapour Singapour
Slovaquie Bratislava
Slovénie Ljubljana
Somalie Mogadiscio
Soudan Khartoum
Soudan du Sud Djouba
Sri Lanka Sri Jayawardenapura
Suède Stockholm
Suisse Berne
Suriname Paramaribo
Syrie Damas
Tadjikistan Douchanbé
Tanzanie Dodoma
Tchad N’Djaména
Thaïlande Bangkok
Timor oriental Dili
Togo Lomé
Tonga Nukuʻalofa
Trinité-et-Tobago Port-d’Espagne
Tunisie Tunis
Turkménistan Achgabat
Turquie Ankara
Tuvalu Funafuti
Ukraine Kiev
Uruguay Montevideo
Vanuatu Port-Vila
Vatican Vatican
Venezuela Caracas
Viêt Nam Hanoï
Yémen Sanaa
Zambie Lusaka
Zimbabwe Harare |
[
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hBSDgE6jM-8/WbPpv67FE9I/AAAAAAABDF4/4MMnpzeT1sAMLNneYFEHdXwbj30X94kRgCHMYCw/s0/000.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xrgfMmQOodU/WbPpvxMYEVI/AAAAAAABDF8/6tL2orexbEMZzj2ccnB-9jL9a2gTjsoiACHMYCw/s0/001.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EZrM5q-oWTI/WbPpwPJSVvI/AAAAAAABDGA/3bI4z7H8MAsyzYnqWIPmmWoBXavZxf8iQCHMYCw/s0/002.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-siXic68Y938/WbPpwFrk70I/AAAAAAABDGE/gKMaSiuFA5o58YwHtRDzq0AXoXtUw6B9QCHMYCw/s0/003.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EtAP6RbJtCs/WbPpwR6xpqI/AAAAAAABDGI/FRIUZEm73nEMefiHZ3w_p9Fz8tTDEiheQCHMYCw/s0/004.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qxRloXKCAE4/WbPpwfhNyUI/AAAAAAABDGM/gCFbBF-VJFQtlO-j3CKq7yJk7AhsGPTwgCHMYCw/s0/005.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xPVsE_gusSI/WbPpwpw5axI/AAAAAAABDGQ/xRPYfb9GM78zX4wDU11c2cWngmFexldbQCHMYCw/s0/006.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LomssXdxpwM/WbPpwstpA4I/AAAAAAABDGU/QYGBWhHrNx0OdFnEZZN_nSwXcVsRP5MsACHMYCw/s0/007.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-03fGvLX7RLg/WbPpw358mFI/AAAAAAABDGY/Zy5SEz6LfIkmSBsdWylXIUgQz9SlGWBVgCHMYCw/s0/008.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TrlMRy3XUok/WbPpw_jVIMI/AAAAAAABDGc/vCl5l3FVUxYeKQGNOi_neQIsZtvtEVvyACHMYCw/s0/009.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TNXV_ibP_A4/WbPpxFSpKtI/AAAAAAABDGg/2RSBDOiRrR8wXyNaJwB62pv9HBYxpPpNACHMYCw/s0/010.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7WvlmpZqOm8/WbPpxPogxbI/AAAAAAABDGk/vBMoL6nNTR0fw350g_Y6IWhvN-74ctbQACHMYCw/s0/011.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-WBlmoeGP4Uw/WbPpxeC2i-I/AAAAAAABDGo/qZ77x980m60bYoRNteDUwWxI8vs3v8a7gCHMYCw/s0/012.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UnMA9JsqxGA/WbPpxX9i3PI/AAAAAAABDGs/Sctbd2OUokU2UgLgwP_ClbnDyYsgFdM_ACHMYCw/s0/013.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-B1DRxR7k_HE/WbPpxqsKIFI/AAAAAAABDGw/mwogyyjN-KEl2rzd5jO2xzWnGHVhsWThgCHMYCw/s0/014.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eN6tYvQuHTg/WbPpxkXoDvI/AAAAAAABDG0/PGdQeXPSnmMdccwdE7MSPdqWz2EEo2EjACHMYCw/s0/015.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-o03k7LrCrBI/WbPpyM7kZsI/AAAAAAABDG4/lZIvKPHXICc9xSGyATK1peW1-pdLpPWQgCHMYCw/s0/016.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pVjnjBijd5M/WbPpyYnX3RI/AAAAAAABDG8/tFbCVXCmALQODwymwx_uyw8Q3cdelKVAwCHMYCw/s0/017.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-h9-6OW2nrkc/WbPpyfiUC7I/AAAAAAABDHA/9fyhZOrMK0IBa_rNjBlWK_P1ITcuMXgxwCHMYCw/s0/018.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GNFEJSV7UYo/WbPpy98dDbI/AAAAAAABDHE/U1V158fmSWofcUYtlsOojsVAS-6WEglYQCHMYCw/s0/019.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_cig2dbj_mg/WbPpy8AvDII/AAAAAAABDHI/3makyc452a8xnSDr_enyIdrLqfpmDJAlQCHMYCw/s0/020.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0l1XXjchdZI/WbPpzOoR36I/AAAAAAABDHM/pTTnVOdqjcA9S8gqaye8iSBXN5bHo0DawCHMYCw/s0/021.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-58QlQnxm5aY/WbPpzebMjsI/AAAAAAABDHQ/1q2OHaE-ZrQ-XPSYmJxGY_e9H0u99MOcgCHMYCw/s0/022.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-8xfvIMRc3_A/WbPpzV8_HSI/AAAAAAABDHU/mlPLOURejIg44iXcB6HSHLGKFOmbuPHpwCHMYCw/s0/023.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Srdgnv--9cQ/WbPpzixg7oI/AAAAAAABDHY/Iw6gc3mGKho3PgDGSw9Y9YYrUWSVAnn0ACHMYCw/s0/024.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xkKy1sfl-pY/WbPpzrhl-OI/AAAAAAABDHc/sftryhzLdWEHQDNaC8uZQFSj5szB5KPxgCHMYCw/s0/025.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mASkDELiVzM/WbPpziOYzjI/AAAAAAABDHg/6V0mgRCIEYsuviI7GykTc6JgoeRcc47bgCHMYCw/s0/026.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GbBIOobnPx8/WbPpz51ojeI/AAAAAAABDHk/_brL7T_GJSsYdovqjZ-yEqqpxupz6uXTgCHMYCw/s0/027.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ximSCQiXF98/WbPpz2NfxsI/AAAAAAABDHo/XK59KFc-_oo6hwiyMkW_RTp2_Tj0mLH9QCHMYCw/s0/028.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-R6zG3EJe5K0/WbPp0JYF6OI/AAAAAAABDHs/ZMM3FkMxi5IswaFDegPP9ethzZ7j1tmJwCHMYCw/s0/029.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iHVtLUg_zI0/WbPp0Psum2I/AAAAAAABDHw/P6GeR4brKzw8PIJEWWtxXQ2jOWf0em20QCHMYCw/s0/030.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_k_y0LDk7Fk/WbPp0QkeuNI/AAAAAAABDH0/uRAV_Xt7VsILiFGadRMPeH-tSeLryY_HgCHMYCw/s0/031.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-2_URphYrDlk/WbPp0gPt7AI/AAAAAAABDH4/SIzHMBI5IxMbVFZT7TE8qM7vwdOZWMRbgCHMYCw/s0/032.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-PusoVARRsts/WbPp0o6aeyI/AAAAAAABDH8/Ok6cng4ctjImyLRdSJpYYlTMYv9A5i28wCHMYCw/s0/033.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0nA8cd-1fQ8/WbPp06gLACI/AAAAAAABDIA/S6QeHrTvjQo0xQMaG7y61ust6UANJzvbwCHMYCw/s0/034.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-O2k-N5OQwvM/WbPp0w4dAXI/AAAAAAABDIE/vBRGhpUYLBg5OpGH9RdOu_2IoMnugXClwCHMYCw/s0/035.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-O_Bp_MBVbPk/WbPp1M3bacI/AAAAAAABDII/TMKF5mjeXzYadD-AXQJAw3umNWN8IIF2gCHMYCw/s0/036.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fAQoyPErQQ0/WbPp1tzB6GI/AAAAAAABDIM/NGzxjjr8q1UDvcBd9PPZmD_g00sRqfVTACHMYCw/s0/037.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-MHZwtlrPdxo/WbPp1-Q_XgI/AAAAAAABDIQ/LF6-LF7kjGYSF7J2mWGraGVqDvyVj39HACHMYCw/s0/038.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cBsS4UQmli8/WbPp1wM4v-I/AAAAAAABDIU/3jVmS-ybINozgzitKbHUv0Tzd-f21deRwCHMYCw/s0/039.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1mE3HJYx9-c/WbPp2FdLI6I/AAAAAAABDIY/peZZicJffV8ogTzkdg5odvaCXFkwU8W3ACHMYCw/s0/040.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Toeeu1Udy10/WbPp2Lp7QfI/AAAAAAABDIc/voOOXMhJMkIzmVY9TdDzocaVxMr4W_CdgCHMYCw/s0/041.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0rLPMw1zMKE/WbPp2X2zVHI/AAAAAAABDIg/eesI_7a2y4YFI3lUzMDVLUzbGptDJaA0gCHMYCw/s0/042.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-izkPwTAHr8s/WbPp2f-RBKI/AAAAAAABDIk/WXDdhxPHU-klSXKbjEtA1wsH0hqE5--7gCHMYCw/s0/043.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nmwK89PreeE/WbPp2my8DaI/AAAAAAABDIo/f2QuEzun75E7byo2gn4M_uaQIjwtMvwhwCHMYCw/s0/044.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dC9mEXRM8Ik/WbPp2zPGFCI/AAAAAAABDIs/7vy1SS80oEYGuZm8uix_dIZFg-uHXgtegCHMYCw/s0/045.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3oYMVtX-uj0/WbPp22KZnRI/AAAAAAABDIw/oDID8mGFPqgYhGIoGI_ZkvQqWWWoWO6OACHMYCw/s0/046.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qsselzNtWb4/WbPp3O3TI8I/AAAAAAABDI0/LFfe7itNtoIV5C7IpBkgl35b7Gs--IV8wCHMYCw/s0/047.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SM14cxoTHkY/WbPp3HsxqAI/AAAAAAABDI4/LHgcO6fMy-cFflnx3BnH6S0uNswbSi69gCHMYCw/s0/048.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-M2qN8YdOVgI/WbPp3WiXF7I/AAAAAAABDI8/lkCL-egFnck4RyRZvVOELCy_jBLAFdm3wCHMYCw/s0/049.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J1rHZ0TeO9M/WbPp3Ype_mI/AAAAAAABDJA/nr-JIZIx3nMoSnS9X7W3YLXoMum5G0CkwCHMYCw/s0/050.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rpDtk622vrg/WbPp3nZL4-I/AAAAAAABDJE/Lk_ZG4vYwA4ks-nhOU9NfgQjXZ3VRQDwQCHMYCw/s0/051.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nM2w_1rUJvc/WbPp3uzF4aI/AAAAAAABDJI/qVlSa3_KMtUJdBPshwfRqTZZav2eqgKBACHMYCw/s0/052.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CiI7C71-zsA/WbPp375oW9I/AAAAAAABDJM/usML491dsPopsrEqIQEbRQ2x_XilDo-rQCHMYCw/s0/053.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-quUh7jGND6c/WbPp3ysK1KI/AAAAAAABDJQ/a1p1boOtSYo4wF5b8N6eY_E0I2UgjJrDwCHMYCw/s0/054.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TgkbcB2rP6s/WbPp4ObiAmI/AAAAAAABDJU/wmVPfO3W-f0txtaNPHwS9VdRceHINUsHACHMYCw/s0/055.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-loTyOGOTtQQ/WbPp4Q5ajuI/AAAAAAABDJY/HeuqjoIsMnIULDA0aRCo_N7fNW37H1HoACHMYCw/s0/056.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-8f2fbUfr5s4/WbPp4U3XflI/AAAAAAABDJc/c0HNX5RiiBUpthKYCU3dQyDWzLtjIW9fwCHMYCw/s0/057.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T1GMltXugnA/WbPp4qeLwmI/AAAAAAABDJg/hYrXfjhDWjwAwaFsDvBSGWBnuvu-kFrfQCHMYCw/s0/058.jpg",
"http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3SSTsqmS0YA/WbPp4pth6OI/AAAAAAABDJk/903A0u_tIMQ3Tk2Y-cS2OqcGu9L4MnlJgCHMYCw/s0/059.jpg"
] |
{"header" : {
"cloc_url" : "github.com/AlDanial/cloc",
"cloc_version" : "1.84",
"elapsed_seconds" : 70.4125938415527,
"n_files" : 161,
"n_lines" : 19391,
"files_per_second" : 2.28652278259047,
"lines_per_second" : 275.391076255974,
"report_file" : "loc/NEU-2016__NEUban.json"},
"CSS" :{
"nFiles": 4,
"blank": 7,
"comment": 24,
"code": 7325},
"Java" :{
"nFiles": 135,
"blank": 1805,
"comment": 650,
"code": 5779},
"JavaScript" :{
"nFiles": 3,
"blank": 582,
"comment": 204,
"code": 1611},
"HTML" :{
"nFiles": 9,
"blank": 2,
"comment": 0,
"code": 330},
"Maven" :{
"nFiles": 4,
"blank": 19,
"comment": 1,
"code": 329},
"SVG" :{
"nFiles": 1,
"blank": 0,
"comment": 0,
"code": 288},
"SQL" :{
"nFiles": 2,
"blank": 86,
"comment": 25,
"code": 130},
"Markdown" :{
"nFiles": 1,
"blank": 53,
"comment": 0,
"code": 100},
"XML" :{
"nFiles": 1,
"blank": 0,
"comment": 0,
"code": 22},
"YAML" :{
"nFiles": 1,
"blank": 5,
"comment": 0,
"code": 14},
"SUM": {
"blank": 2559,
"comment": 904,
"code": 15928,
"nFiles": 161} }
|
["ada761213e719a7fcf189b0f3b216a369f608e2a"] |
{"userName": "alioh", "bio": "Cats, black & white and random pictures.", "outputProfileName": "alioh", "bigrams": ["al", "li", "io", "oh", "Al", "li", "i", "O"], "pictureURL": "https://scontent-ord1-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-19/11375810_453635674818026_124981934_a.jpg", "fullName": "Ali O", "externalUrl": "http://alioh.com"} |
{
"first_traded_price": 2238.0,
"highest_price": 2256.0,
"isin": "IRO1RINM0001",
"last_traded_price": 2256.0,
"lowest_price": 2102.0,
"trade_volume": 940399.0,
"unix_time": 1400889600
} |
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Information",
"Microsoft": "Warning",
"Microsoft.Hosting.Lifetime": "Information"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*",
"IdentityServerConfigs": {
"client_id": "MobileBff",
"client_secret": "MobileBffSecret",
"AccessTokenUrl": "http://localhost:20000/connect/token"
},
"Servers": {
"Identity": "http://localhost:20000",
"Catalog": "http://localhost:20001"
},
"Services": {
"Authorization": "http://localhost:20000",
"Catalog": "http://localhost:20001",
"Transaction": "http://localhost:20002",
"ApiGateway": "http://localhost:25000",
"AdminGateway": "http://localhost:25001",
"Grpc": {
"Catalog": "http://localhost:21001",
"Authorization": "http://localhost:21000"
}
}
}
|
{"feedstocks": ["libuldaq"]} |
["46a7f80c5308d5723c2a346fcf5a3f9774e4307f"] |
{"name":"שלמה אלישיב ז\"ל","date":"25/9/1954","age":"27"}
|
{"cacheUntil":1534254479710,"data":{"coordinates":"npm:parse5@3.0.2","description":"WHATWG HTML5 specification-compliant, fast and ready for production HTML parsing/serialization toolset for Node and io.js.","reference":"https://ossindex.sonatype.org/component/npm:parse5@3.0.2","vulnerabilities":[],"version":"3.0.2","name":"parse5","format":"npm","depPaths":["/sonarwhal/jsdom/parse5"]}} |
{"Vancouver": {"Esther Short Park": "Esther Short Park is a public park and town square located in downtown Vancouver, Washington. Established in 1853, it is the oldest public park in the state of Washington. and one of the oldest public parks in the West."}} |
{"cacheUntil":1536835873940,"data":{"coordinates":"pkg:npm/grunt-exec@0.4.7","description":"Grunt task for executing shell commands.","reference":"https://ossindex.sonatype.org/component/pkg:npm/grunt-exec@0.4.7","vulnerabilities":[],"version":"0.4.7","name":"grunt-exec","format":"npm","depPaths":["/grunt-exec"]}} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.