id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-11700
Ceiling is between Number and One More
:$x \le \ceiling x < x + 1$ where $\ceiling x$ denotes the ceiling of $x$.
From Number is between Ceiling and One Less: :$\ceiling x - 1 < x \le \ceiling x$ Thus by adding $1$: :$x + 1 > \paren {\ceiling x - 1} + 1 = \ceiling x$ So: :$x \le \ceiling x$ and: :$\ceiling x < x + 1$ as required. {{qed}}
:$x \le \ceiling x < x + 1$ where $\ceiling x$ denotes the [[Definition:Ceiling Function|ceiling]] of $x$.
From [[Number is between Ceiling and One Less]]: :$\ceiling x - 1 < x \le \ceiling x$ Thus by adding $1$: :$x + 1 > \paren {\ceiling x - 1} + 1 = \ceiling x$ So: :$x \le \ceiling x$ and: :$\ceiling x < x + 1$ as required. {{qed}}
Ceiling is between Number and One More
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ceiling_is_between_Number_and_One_More
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ceiling_is_between_Number_and_One_More
[ "Ceiling Function" ]
[ "Definition:Ceiling Function" ]
[ "Number is between Ceiling and One Less" ]
proofwiki-11701
Ceiling of Number plus Integer
:$\forall n \in \Z: \ceiling x + n = \ceiling {x + n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \ceiling {x + n} - 1 | o = < | m = x + n | mo= \le | r = \ceiling {x + n} | c = Number is between Ceiling and One Less }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \ceiling {x + n} - n - 1 | o = < | m = x | mo= \le | r = \ceiling {x + n} - n ...
:$\forall n \in \Z: \ceiling x + n = \ceiling {x + n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \ceiling {x + n} - 1 | o = < | m = x + n | mo= \le | r = \ceiling {x + n} | c = [[Number is between Ceiling and One Less]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \ceiling {x + n} - n - 1 | o = < | m = x | mo= \le | r = \ceiling {x + n} - n ...
Ceiling of Number plus Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ceiling_of_Number_plus_Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ceiling_of_Number_plus_Integer
[ "Ceiling Function" ]
[]
[ "Number is between Ceiling and One Less", "Number is between Ceiling and One Less" ]
proofwiki-11702
Relation Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Ideal
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $R$ be auxiliary relation on $S$. Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^R$ is ideal in $L$ where $x^R$ denotes the $R$-segment of $x$.
=== Non-empty === By definition of auxiliary relation: :$\tuple {\bot, x} \in R$ where $\bot$ denotes the smallest element in $L$. By definition of relation segment: :$\bot \in x^R$ Thus by definition: :$x^R$ is non-empty. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $R$ be [[Definition:Auxiliary Relation|auxiliary relation]] on $S$. Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^R$ is [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideal]] in $L$ where $x^R$ denotes the [[Defi...
=== Non-empty === By definition of [[Definition:Auxiliary Relation|auxiliary relation]]: :$\tuple {\bot, x} \in R$ where $\bot$ denotes the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]] in $L$. By definition of [[Definition:Relation Segment|relation segment]]: :$\bot \in x^R$ Thus by definition: :$x^R$ is [[Defin...
Relation Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relation_Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_is_Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relation_Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_is_Ideal
[ "Auxiliary Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Relation Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Rela...
proofwiki-11703
Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus
Let $x, y \in \R$ be real numbers. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the floor of $\dfrac x y$. Let $y \ne 0$. Then: :$0 \le \dfrac x y - \floor {\dfrac x y} = \dfrac {x \bmod y}...
From Real Number minus Floor: :$\dfrac x y - \floor {\dfrac x y} \in \hointr 0 1$ Thus by definition of half-open real interval: :$0 \le \dfrac x y - \floor {\dfrac x y} < 1$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \bmod y | r = x - y \floor {\frac x y} | c = {{Defof|Modulo Operation}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto ...
Let $x, y \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $\dfra...
From [[Real Number minus Floor]]: :$\dfrac x y - \floor {\dfrac x y} \in \hointr 0 1$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Half-Open Real Interval|half-open real interval]]: :$0 \le \dfrac x y - \floor {\dfrac x y} < 1$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \bmod y | r = x - y \floor {\frac x y} | c = {{Defof...
Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_of_Modulo_Operation_with_Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_of_Modulo_Operation_with_Modulus
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Modulo Operation", "Definition:Floor Function" ]
[ "Real Number minus Floor", "Definition:Real Interval/Half-Open" ]
proofwiki-11704
Range of Modulo Operation for Positive Modulus
Let $x, y \in \R$ be real numbers. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the floor of $\dfrac x y$. Let $y > 0$. Then: :$0 \le x \bmod y < y$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | o = \le | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y | mo= < | r = 1 | c = Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 0 | o = \le | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y \times y | mo= < | r = 1 \times y | c = Real Number Orderi...
Let $x, y \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $\dfra...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | o = \le | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y | mo= < | r = 1 | c = [[Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 0 | o = \le | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y \times y | mo= < | r = 1 \times y | c = [[Real Number ...
Range of Modulo Operation for Positive Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Range_of_Modulo_Operation_for_Positive_Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Range_of_Modulo_Operation_for_Positive_Modulus
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Modulo Operation", "Definition:Floor Function" ]
[ "Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus", "Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication" ]
proofwiki-11705
Range of Modulo Operation for Negative Modulus
Let $x, y \in \R$ be real numbers. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the floor of $\dfrac x y$. Let $y < 0$. Then: :$0 \ge x \bmod y > y$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | o = \le | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y | mo= < | r = 1 | c = Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 0 | o = \ge | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y \times y | mo= > | r = 1 \times y | c = Real Number Orderi...
Let $x, y \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $\dfra...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | o = \le | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y | mo= < | r = 1 | c = [[Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = 0 | o = \ge | m = \frac {x \bmod y} y \times y | mo= > | r = 1 \times y | c = [[Real Number ...
Range of Modulo Operation for Negative Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Range_of_Modulo_Operation_for_Negative_Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Range_of_Modulo_Operation_for_Negative_Modulus
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Modulo Operation", "Definition:Floor Function" ]
[ "Quotient of Modulo Operation with Modulus", "Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication" ]
proofwiki-11706
Zero is Integer Multiple of Zero
Zero is an integer multiple of zero.
We have that: :$0 \times 0 = 0$ The result follows by definition of integer multiple. {{qed}} Category:Number Theory cr4qeo16keg2mqnhx82y0t2xypme5gz
[[Definition:Zero (Number)|Zero]] is an [[Definition:Integer Multiple|integer multiple]] of [[Definition:Zero (Number)|zero]].
We have that: :$0 \times 0 = 0$ The result follows by definition of [[Definition:Integer Multiple|integer multiple]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Number Theory]] cr4qeo16keg2mqnhx82y0t2xypme5gz
Zero is Integer Multiple of Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_is_Integer_Multiple_of_Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_is_Integer_Multiple_of_Zero
[ "Number Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers", "Definition:Zero (Number)" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers", "Category:Number Theory" ]
proofwiki-11707
Number minus Modulo is Integer Multiple
Let $x, y \in \R$ be real numbers. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the floor of $\dfrac x y$. Let $y < 0$. Then: :$x - \paren {x \bmod y}$ is an integer multiple of $y$.
When $y = 0$ we have: :$x \bmod y := x$ Thus: :$x - \paren {x \bmod y} = 0$ From Zero is Integer Multiple of Zero it follows that: :$x - \paren {x \bmod y}$ is an integer multiple of $y$. Let $y \ne 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \bmod y | r = x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} | c = {{Defof|Modulo Operation}...
Let $x, y \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := \begin{cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end{cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $\dfra...
When $y = 0$ we have: :$x \bmod y := x$ Thus: :$x - \paren {x \bmod y} = 0$ From [[Zero is Integer Multiple of Zero]] it follows that: :$x - \paren {x \bmod y}$ is an [[Definition:Integer Multiple|integer multiple]] of $y$. Let $y \ne 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \bmod y | r = x - y \floor {\dfrac x...
Number minus Modulo is Integer Multiple
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_minus_Modulo_is_Integer_Multiple
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_minus_Modulo_is_Integer_Multiple
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Modulo Operation", "Definition:Floor Function", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers" ]
[ "Zero is Integer Multiple of Zero", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers", "Floor Function is Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers" ]
proofwiki-11708
Modulo Operation/Examples/5 mod 3
:$5 \bmod 3 = 2$
By definition of modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := x - y \floor {\dfrac x y}$ for $y \ne 0$. We have: :$\dfrac 5 3 = 1 + \dfrac 2 3$ and so: :$\floor {\dfrac 5 3} = 1$ Thus: :$5 \bmod 3 = 5 - 3 \times \floor {\dfrac 5 3} = 5 - 3 \times 1 = 2$ {{qed}}
:$5 \bmod 3 = 2$
By definition of [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := x - y \floor {\dfrac x y}$ for $y \ne 0$. We have: :$\dfrac 5 3 = 1 + \dfrac 2 3$ and so: :$\floor {\dfrac 5 3} = 1$ Thus: :$5 \bmod 3 = 5 - 3 \times \floor {\dfrac 5 3} = 5 - 3 \times 1 = 2$ {{qed}}
Modulo Operation/Examples/5 mod 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Operation/Examples/5_mod_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Operation/Examples/5_mod_3
[ "Examples of Modulo Operation" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Modulo Operation" ]
proofwiki-11709
Modulo Operation/Examples/18 mod 3
:$18 \bmod 3 = 0$
By definition of modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := x - y \floor {\dfrac x y}$ for $y \ne 0$. We have: :$\dfrac {18} 3 = 6 + \dfrac 0 3$ and so: :$\floor {\dfrac {18} 3} = 6$ Thus: :$18 \bmod 3 = 18 - 3 \times \floor {\dfrac {18} 3} = 18 - 3 \times 6 = 0$ {{qed}}
:$18 \bmod 3 = 0$
By definition of [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := x - y \floor {\dfrac x y}$ for $y \ne 0$. We have: :$\dfrac {18} 3 = 6 + \dfrac 0 3$ and so: :$\floor {\dfrac {18} 3} = 6$ Thus: :$18 \bmod 3 = 18 - 3 \times \floor {\dfrac {18} 3} = 18 - 3 \times 6 = 0$ {{qed}}
Modulo Operation/Examples/18 mod 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Operation/Examples/18_mod_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Operation/Examples/18_mod_3
[ "Examples of Modulo Operation" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Modulo Operation" ]
proofwiki-11710
Modulo Operation/Examples/-2 mod 3
:$-2 \bmod 3 = 1$
By definition of modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := x - y \floor {\dfrac x y}$ for $y \ne 0$. We have: :$\dfrac {-2} 3 = -1 + \dfrac 1 3$ and so: :$\floor {\dfrac {-2} 3} = -1$ Thus: :$-2 \bmod 3 = -2 - 3 \times \floor {\dfrac {-2} 3} = -2 - 3 \times \paren {-1} = 1$ {{qed}}
:$-2 \bmod 3 = 1$
By definition of [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := x - y \floor {\dfrac x y}$ for $y \ne 0$. We have: :$\dfrac {-2} 3 = -1 + \dfrac 1 3$ and so: :$\floor {\dfrac {-2} 3} = -1$ Thus: :$-2 \bmod 3 = -2 - 3 \times \floor {\dfrac {-2} 3} = -2 - 3 \times \paren {-1} = 1$ {{qed}}
Modulo Operation/Examples/-2 mod 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Operation/Examples/-2_mod_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Operation/Examples/-2_mod_3
[ "Examples of Modulo Operation" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Modulo Operation" ]
proofwiki-11711
Number is Divisor iff Modulo is Zero
Let $x, y \in \R$ be real numbers. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the modulo operation: :$x \bmod y := \begin {cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end {cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the floor of $\dfrac x y$. Then $x \bmod y = 0$ {{iff}} $x$ is an integer multiple of $y$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $x \bmod y = 0$. From Number minus Modulo is Integer Multiple: :$x - \paren {x \bmod y}$ is an integer multiple of $y$. As $x \bmod y = 0$ it follows that $x - 0 = x$ is an integer multiple of $y$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $x, y \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $x \bmod y$ denote the [[Definition:Modulo Operation|modulo operation]]: :$x \bmod y := \begin {cases} x - y \floor {\dfrac x y} & : y \ne 0 \\ x & : y = 0 \end {cases}$ where $\floor {\dfrac x y}$ denotes the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $\df...
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $x \bmod y = 0$. From [[Number minus Modulo is Integer Multiple]]: :$x - \paren {x \bmod y}$ is an [[Definition:Integer Multiple|integer multiple]] of $y$. As $x \bmod y = 0$ it follows that $x - 0 = x$ is an [[Definition:Integer Multiple|integer multiple]] of $y$. {{qed|lemma}}
Number is Divisor iff Modulo is Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_is_Divisor_iff_Modulo_is_Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_is_Divisor_iff_Modulo_is_Zero
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Modulo Operation", "Definition:Floor Function", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers" ]
[ "Number minus Modulo is Integer Multiple", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers" ]
proofwiki-11712
Correctness of Definition of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be an ordered set. Let $\map {\it Ids} R$ be the set of all ideals in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\it Ids} R, \precsim}$ be an ordered set where $\precsim \mathop = \subseteq \restriction_{\map {\it Ids} R \times \map {\it Ids} R}$ Let: :$M = \struct {F, \preccurlyeq}$ where: :$F = \left...
=== Reflexivity === Let $f \in F$. By definition of reflexivity: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x \precsim \map f x$ Thus by definition of ordering on mappings: :$f \preccurlyeq f$ {{qed|lemma}}
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Let $\map {\it Ids} R$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of all [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideals]] in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\it Ids} R, \precsim}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]] where $\precsim \mathop = \sub...
=== Reflexivity === Let $f \in F$. By definition of [[Definition:Reflexivity|reflexivity]]: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x \precsim \map f x$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Ordering on Mappings|ordering on mappings]]: :$f \preccurlyeq f$ {{qed|lemma}}
Correctness of Definition of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Correctness_of_Definition_of_Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Correctness_of_Definition_of_Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure
[ "Order Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Ordering on Mappings", "Definition:Lower Closure/Element", "Definition:Ordered Set" ]
[ "Definition:Reflexivity", "Definition:Ordering on Mappings", "Definition:Ordering on Mappings", "Definition:Ordering on Mappings", "Definition:Ordering on Mappings" ]
proofwiki-11713
Number less than Integer iff Floor less than Integer
:$\floor x < n \iff x < n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x < n$. By definition of the floor of $x$: :$\floor x \le x$ Hence: :$\floor x < n$ {{qed|lemma}}
:$\floor x < n \iff x < n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x < n$. By definition of the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $x$: :$\floor x \le x$ Hence: :$\floor x < n$ {{qed|lemma}}
Number less than Integer iff Floor less than Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_less_than_Integer_iff_Floor_less_than_Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_less_than_Integer_iff_Floor_less_than_Integer
[ "Floor Function" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Floor Function" ]
proofwiki-11714
Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer
:$x \ge n \iff \floor x \ge n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $\floor x \ge n$. By definition of the floor of $x$: :$x \ge \floor x$ Hence: :$x \ge n$ {{qed|lemma}}
:$x \ge n \iff \floor x \ge n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $\floor x \ge n$. By definition of the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $x$: :$x \ge \floor x$ Hence: :$x \ge n$ {{qed|lemma}}
Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_not_less_than_Integer_iff_Floor_not_less_than_Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_not_less_than_Integer_iff_Floor_not_less_than_Integer
[ "Floor Function" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Floor Function", "Definition:Floor Function" ]
proofwiki-11715
Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer
:$\ceiling x \le n \iff x \le n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $\ceiling x \le n$. By Number is between Ceiling and One Less: :$x \le \ceiling x$ Hence: :$x \le n$ {{qed|lemma}}
:$\ceiling x \le n \iff x \le n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $\ceiling x \le n$. By [[Number is between Ceiling and One Less]]: :$x \le \ceiling x$ Hence: :$x \le n$ {{qed|lemma}}
Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_not_greater_than_Integer_iff_Ceiling_not_greater_than_Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_not_greater_than_Integer_iff_Ceiling_not_greater_than_Integer
[ "Ceiling Function" ]
[]
[ "Number is between Ceiling and One Less", "Number is between Ceiling and One Less" ]
proofwiki-11716
Number greater than Integer iff Ceiling greater than Integer
:$\ceiling x > n \iff x > n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x > n$. By Number is between Ceiling and One Less: :$\ceiling x \ge x$ Hence: :$\ceiling x > n$ {{qed|lemma}}
:$\ceiling x > n \iff x > n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x > n$. By [[Number is between Ceiling and One Less]]: :$\ceiling x \ge x$ Hence: :$\ceiling x > n$ {{qed|lemma}}
Number greater than Integer iff Ceiling greater than Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_greater_than_Integer_iff_Ceiling_greater_than_Integer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_greater_than_Integer_iff_Ceiling_greater_than_Integer
[ "Ceiling Function" ]
[]
[ "Number is between Ceiling and One Less", "Number is between Ceiling and One Less" ]
proofwiki-11717
Integer equals Floor iff between Number and One Less
:$\floor x = n \iff x - 1 < n \le x$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x - 1 < n \le x$. From $n \le x$, we have by Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer: :$n \le \floor x$ From $x - 1 < n$: :$x < n + 1$ Hence by Number less than Integer iff Floor less than Integer: :$\floor x < n + 1$ We have that: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: m \le n \if...
:$\floor x = n \iff x - 1 < n \le x$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x - 1 < n \le x$. From $n \le x$, we have by [[Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer]]: :$n \le \floor x$ From $x - 1 < n$: :$x < n + 1$ Hence by [[Number less than Integer iff Floor less than Integer]]: :$\floor x < n + 1$ We have that: :$\forall m, n \in \Z...
Integer equals Floor iff between Number and One Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Floor_iff_between_Number_and_One_Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Floor_iff_between_Number_and_One_Less
[ "Floor Function" ]
[]
[ "Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer", "Number less than Integer iff Floor less than Integer", "Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer" ]
proofwiki-11718
Integer equals Floor iff Number between Integer and One More
:$\floor x = n \iff n \le x < n + 1$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $n \le x < n + 1$. From Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer: :$n \le x \implies n \le \floor x$ By definition of the floor of $x$: :$\floor x \le x$ and so by hypothesis: :$\floor x < n + 1$ We have that: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: m \le n \iff m < n + 1$ and so: :$\...
:$\floor x = n \iff n \le x < n + 1$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $n \le x < n + 1$. From [[Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer]]: :$n \le x \implies n \le \floor x$ By definition of the [[Definition:Floor Function|floor]] of $x$: :$\floor x \le x$ and so [[Definition:By Hypothesis|by hypothesis]]: :$\floor x < n + 1$ We ...
Integer equals Floor iff Number between Integer and One More
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Floor_iff_Number_between_Integer_and_One_More
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Floor_iff_Number_between_Integer_and_One_More
[ "Floor Function" ]
[]
[ "Number not less than Integer iff Floor not less than Integer", "Definition:Floor Function", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Definition:Floor Function", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Definition:Floor Function", "Definition:By Hypothesis" ]
proofwiki-11719
Integer equals Ceiling iff between Number and One More
:$\ceiling x = n \iff x \le n < x + 1$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x \le n < x + 1$. From $x \le n$, we have by Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer: :$\ceiling x \le n$ From $n < x + 1$: :$n - 1 < x$ Hence by Number greater than Integer iff Ceiling greater than Integer: :$n - 1 < \ceiling x$ We have that: :$\forall m, n...
:$\ceiling x = n \iff x \le n < x + 1$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x \le n < x + 1$. From $x \le n$, we have by [[Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer]]: :$\ceiling x \le n$ From $n < x + 1$: :$n - 1 < x$ Hence by [[Number greater than Integer iff Ceiling greater than Integer]]: :$n - 1 < \ceiling x$ We have that: :...
Integer equals Ceiling iff between Number and One More
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Ceiling_iff_between_Number_and_One_More
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Ceiling_iff_between_Number_and_One_More
[ "Ceiling Function" ]
[]
[ "Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer", "Number greater than Integer iff Ceiling greater than Integer", "Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer" ]
proofwiki-11720
Integer equals Ceiling iff Number between Integer and One Less
:$\ceiling x = n \iff n - 1 < x \le n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $n - 1 < x \le n$. From Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer: :$x \le n \implies \ceiling x \le n$ From Number is between Ceiling and One Less: :$x \le \ceiling x$ and so: :$n - 1 < \ceiling x$ We have that: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: m - 1 < n \iff m \le n$ a...
:$\ceiling x = n \iff n - 1 < x \le n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $n - 1 < x \le n$. From [[Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer]]: :$x \le n \implies \ceiling x \le n$ From [[Number is between Ceiling and One Less]]: :$x \le \ceiling x$ and so: :$n - 1 < \ceiling x$ We have that: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: m - 1 < n \...
Integer equals Ceiling iff Number between Integer and One Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Ceiling_iff_Number_between_Integer_and_One_Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_equals_Ceiling_iff_Number_between_Integer_and_One_Less
[ "Ceiling Function" ]
[]
[ "Number not greater than Integer iff Ceiling not greater than Integer", "Number is between Ceiling and One Less", "Number is between Ceiling and One Less", "Number is between Ceiling and One Less" ]
proofwiki-11721
Floor of Root of Floor equals Floor of Root
:$\ds \floor {\sqrt {\floor x} } = \floor {\sqrt x}$
The square root is defined on the interval $\hointr 0 \to$. We have that Square Root is Strictly Increasing. From Continuity of Root Function, the square root is continuous. Hence the conditions are fulfilled for for McEliece's Theorem (Integer Functions) to be applied: :$\forall x \in A: \paren {\map f x \in \Z \impli...
:$\ds \floor {\sqrt {\floor x} } = \floor {\sqrt x}$
The [[Definition:Square Root|square root]] is defined on the [[Definition:Real Interval|interval]] $\hointr 0 \to$. We have that [[Square Root is Strictly Increasing]]. From [[Continuity of Root Function]], the [[Definition:Square Root|square root]] is [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous]]. Hence the co...
Floor of Root of Floor equals Floor of Root/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Floor_of_Root_of_Floor_equals_Floor_of_Root
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Floor_of_Root_of_Floor_equals_Floor_of_Root/Proof_2
[ "Floor Function", "Floor of Root of Floor equals Floor of Root" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Real Interval", "Square Root is Strictly Increasing", "Continuity of Root Function", "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "McEliece's Theorem (Integer Functions)", "Definition:Square Root", "Integer Multiplication is Closed" ]
proofwiki-11722
Ceiling of Root of Ceiling equals Ceiling of Root
:$\ds \ceiling {\sqrt {\ceiling x} } = \ceiling {\sqrt x}$
The square root is defined on the interval $\hointr 0 \to$. We have that Square Root is Strictly Increasing. From Continuity of Root Function, the square root is continuous. Hence the conditions are fulfilled for for McEliece's Theorem (Integer Functions) to be applied: :$\forall x \in A: \paren {\map f x \in \Z \impli...
:$\ds \ceiling {\sqrt {\ceiling x} } = \ceiling {\sqrt x}$
The [[Definition:Square Root|square root]] is defined on the [[Definition:Real Interval|interval]] $\hointr 0 \to$. We have that [[Square Root is Strictly Increasing]]. From [[Continuity of Root Function]], the [[Definition:Square Root|square root]] is [[Definition:Continuous Real Function|continuous]]. Hence the co...
Ceiling of Root of Ceiling equals Ceiling of Root/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ceiling_of_Root_of_Ceiling_equals_Ceiling_of_Root
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ceiling_of_Root_of_Ceiling_equals_Ceiling_of_Root/Proof_2
[ "Ceiling Function", "Ceiling of Root of Ceiling equals Ceiling of Root" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Real Interval", "Square Root is Strictly Increasing", "Continuity of Root Function", "Definition:Square Root", "Definition:Continuous Real Function", "McEliece's Theorem (Integer Functions)", "Definition:Square Root", "Integer Multiplication is Closed" ]
proofwiki-11723
Congruence by Divisor of Modulus/Integer Modulus
Let $r, s \in \Z$ be integers. Let $a, b \in \Z$ such that $a$ is congruent modulo $r s$ to $b$, that is: :$a \equiv b \pmod {r s}$ Then: :$a \equiv b \pmod r$ and: :$a \equiv b \pmod s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod {r s} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a - b | r = q r s | c = {{Defof|Congruence Modulo Integer}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a - b | r = \paren {q r} s | c = }} {{eqn | lo= \land | l =...
Let $r, s \in \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. Let $a, b \in \Z$ such that $a$ is [[Definition:Congruence Modulo Integer|congruent modulo $r s$]] to $b$, that is: :$a \equiv b \pmod {r s}$ Then: :$a \equiv b \pmod r$ and: :$a \equiv b \pmod s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod {r s} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a - b | r = q r s | c = {{Defof|Congruence Modulo Integer}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a - b | r = \paren {q r} s | c = }} {{eqn | lo= \land | l =...
Congruence by Divisor of Modulus/Integer Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Congruence_by_Divisor_of_Modulus/Integer_Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Congruence_by_Divisor_of_Modulus/Integer_Modulus
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
proofwiki-11724
Modulo Addition is Well-Defined/Real Modulus
Let $z \in \R$ be a real number. {{Explain|What if z is zero?}} Let: :$a \equiv b \pmod z$ and: :$x \equiv y \pmod z$ where $a, b, x, y \in \R$. Then: : $a + x \equiv b + y \pmod z$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod z | c = }} {{eqn | l = c | o = \equiv | r = d | rr= \pmod z | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \bmod z | r = b \bmod z | c = {{Defof|Congruence (Number Theory)|Congruence}} }} {{eqn | l = x ...
Let $z \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. {{Explain|What if z is zero?}} Let: :$a \equiv b \pmod z$ and: :$x \equiv y \pmod z$ where $a, b, x, y \in \R$. Then: : $a + x \equiv b + y \pmod z$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod z | c = }} {{eqn | l = c | o = \equiv | r = d | rr= \pmod z | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \bmod z | r = b \bmod z | c = {{Defof|Congruence (Number Theory)|Congruence}} }} {{eqn | l = x ...
Modulo Addition is Well-Defined/Real Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Addition_is_Well-Defined/Real_Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Addition_is_Well-Defined/Real_Modulus
[ "Modulo Addition", "Modulo Addition is Well-Defined" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number" ]
[]
proofwiki-11725
Modulo Multiplication is Well-Defined/Warning
Let $z \in \R$ be a real number. Let: :$a \equiv b \pmod z$ and: :$x \equiv y \pmod z$ where $a, b, x, y \in \R$. Then it does '''not''' necessarily hold that: :$a x \equiv b y \pmod z$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod m | c = }} {{eqn | l = x | o = \equiv | r = y | rr= \pmod m | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \bmod m | r = b \bmod m | c = {{Defof|Congruence (Number Theory)|Congruence}} }} {{eqn | l = ...
Let $z \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let: :$a \equiv b \pmod z$ and: :$x \equiv y \pmod z$ where $a, b, x, y \in \R$. Then it does '''not''' necessarily hold that: :$a x \equiv b y \pmod z$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod m | c = }} {{eqn | l = x | o = \equiv | r = y | rr= \pmod m | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \bmod m | r = b \bmod m | c = {{Defof|Congruence (Number Theory)|Congruence}} }} {{eqn | l = ...
Modulo Multiplication is Well-Defined/Warning
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Multiplication_is_Well-Defined/Warning
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Modulo_Multiplication_is_Well-Defined/Warning
[ "Modulo Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number" ]
[ "Integer Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer" ]
proofwiki-11726
Congruence by Product of Moduli/Real Modulus
Let $a, b, z \in \R$. Let $a \equiv b \pmod z$ denote that $a$ is congruent to $b$ modulo $z$. Then $\forall y \in \R, y \ne 0$: :$a \equiv b \pmod z \iff y a \equiv y b \pmod {y z}$
Let $y \in \R: y \ne 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod z | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = a \bmod z | r = b \bmod z | c = {{Defof|Congruence (Number Theory)|Congruence}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = y \paren {a \bmod ...
Let $a, b, z \in \R$. Let $a \equiv b \pmod z$ denote that [[Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)|$a$ is congruent to $b$ modulo $z$]]. Then $\forall y \in \R, y \ne 0$: :$a \equiv b \pmod z \iff y a \equiv y b \pmod {y z}$
Let $y \in \R: y \ne 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | o = \equiv | r = b | rr= \pmod z | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = a \bmod z | r = b \bmod z | c = {{Defof|Congruence (Number Theory)|Congruence}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = y \paren {a \bmo...
Congruence by Product of Moduli/Real Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Congruence_by_Product_of_Moduli/Real_Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Congruence_by_Product_of_Moduli/Real_Modulus
[ "Modulo Arithmetic" ]
[ "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)" ]
[ "Product Distributes over Modulo Operation" ]
proofwiki-11727
Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Subset of Lower Closure
Let $\struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $R$ be auxiliary relation on $S$. Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^R \subseteq x^\preceq$ where :$x^R$ denotes the $R$-segment of $x$, :$x^\preceq$ denotes the lower closure of $x$.
Let $a \in x^R$. By definition of $R$-segment of $x$: :$\tuple {a, x} \in R$ By definition of auxiliary relation: :$a \preceq x$ Thus by definition of lower closure of element: :$a \in x^\preceq$ {{qed}}
Let $\struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $R$ be [[Definition:Auxiliary Relation|auxiliary relation]] on $S$. Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^R \subseteq x^\preceq$ where :$x^R$ denotes the [[Definition:Relation Segment|$R$-segment...
Let $a \in x^R$. By definition of [[Definition:Relation Segment|$R$-segment]] of $x$: :$\tuple {a, x} \in R$ By definition of [[Definition:Auxiliary Relation|auxiliary relation]]: :$a \preceq x$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Lower Closure of Element|lower closure of element]]: :$a \in x^\preceq$ {{qed}}
Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Subset of Lower Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_is_Subset_of_Lower_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_is_Subset_of_Lower_Closure
[ "Auxiliary Relations", "Lower Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Lower Closure/Element" ]
[ "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Lower Closure/Element" ]
proofwiki-11728
Power Function is Completely Multiplicative/Integers
Let $c \in \Z$ be an integer. Let $f_c: \Z \to \Z$ be the mapping defined as: :$\forall n \in \Z: \map {f_c} n = n^c$ Then $f_c$ is completely multiplicative.
Let $r, s \in \Z$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {f_c} {r s} | r = \paren {r s}^c | c = }} {{eqn | r = r^c s^c | c = Product of Powers }} {{eqn | r = \map {f_c} r \map {f_c} s | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{Qed}}
Let $c \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Let $f_c: \Z \to \Z$ be the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] defined as: :$\forall n \in \Z: \map {f_c} n = n^c$ Then $f_c$ is [[Definition:Completely Multiplicative Function|completely multiplicative]].
Let $r, s \in \Z$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {f_c} {r s} | r = \paren {r s}^c | c = }} {{eqn | r = r^c s^c | c = [[Product of Powers]] }} {{eqn | r = \map {f_c} r \map {f_c} s | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{Qed}}
Power Function is Completely Multiplicative/Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Function_is_Completely_Multiplicative/Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Function_is_Completely_Multiplicative/Integers
[ "Completely Multiplicative Functions", "Number Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Completely Multiplicative Function" ]
[ "Exponent Combination Laws/Product of Powers" ]
proofwiki-11729
Preceding implies Inclusion of Segments of Auxiliary Relation
Let $\left({S, \vee, \preceq}\right)$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $R$ be an auxiliary relation on $S$. Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq y$ Then :$x^R \subseteq y^R$ where $x^R$ denotes the $R$-segment of $x$.
Let $a \in x^R$. By definition of $R$-segment of $x$: :$\left({a, x}\right) \in R$ By definition of reflexivity: :$a \preceq a$ By definition of auxiliary relation: :$\left({a, y}\right) \in R$ Thus by definition of $R$-segment of $y$: :$a \in y^R$ {{qed}}
Let $\left({S, \vee, \preceq}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $R$ be an [[Definition:Auxiliary Relation|auxiliary relation]] on $S$. Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq y$ Then :$x^R \subseteq y^R$ where $x^R$ denotes the [[Definition:...
Let $a \in x^R$. By definition of [[Definition:Relation Segment|$R$-segment]] of $x$: :$\left({a, x}\right) \in R$ By definition of [[Definition:Reflexivity|reflexivity]]: :$a \preceq a$ By definition of [[Definition:Auxiliary Relation|auxiliary relation]]: :$\left({a, y}\right) \in R$ Thus by definition of [[Defin...
Preceding implies Inclusion of Segments of Auxiliary Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Preceding_implies_Inclusion_of_Segments_of_Auxiliary_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Preceding_implies_Inclusion_of_Segments_of_Auxiliary_Relation
[ "Auxiliary Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Relation Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Reflexivity", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Relation Segment" ]
proofwiki-11730
Characteristic Function of Square-Free Integers is Multiplicative
Let $S \subseteq \Z$ be the set of positive integers defined as: :$S := \set {n \in \Z: \forall k \in \Z_{>1}: k^2 \nmid n}$ That is, let $S$ be the set of all square-free positive integers. Let $\chi_S: \N \to \Z$ denote the characteristic function of $S$: :$\forall n \in \Z: \map {\chi_S} n = \sqbrk {n \in S}$ where ...
Let $r, s \in \Z$ such that $r \perp s$.
Let $S \subseteq \Z$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] defined as: :$S := \set {n \in \Z: \forall k \in \Z_{>1}: k^2 \nmid n}$ That is, let $S$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Square-Free Integer|square-free]] [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive int...
Let $r, s \in \Z$ such that $r \perp s$.
Characteristic Function of Square-Free Integers is Multiplicative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristic_Function_of_Square-Free_Integers_is_Multiplicative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristic_Function_of_Square-Free_Integers_is_Multiplicative
[ "Multiplicative Functions", "Number Theory", "Square-Free Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Square-Free Integer", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Characteristic Function (Set Theory)/Set", "Definition:Iverson's Convention", "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function" ]
[]
proofwiki-11731
Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Increasing
Let $R = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be an ordered set. Let ${\it Ids}\left({R}\right)$ be the set of all ideals in $R$. Let $L = \left({ {\it Ids}\left({R}\right), \precsim}\right)$ be an ordered set where $\precsim \mathop = \subseteq\restriction_{ {\it Ids}\left({R}\right) \times {\it Ids}\left({R}\right)}$ Let $r$ b...
$f$ is well-defined because by Relation Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Ideal: :$\forall x \in S: x^r$ is ideal in $L$ Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq y$ By Preceding implies Inclusion of Segments of Auxiliary Relation: :$x^r \subseteq y^r$ Thus by definitions of $\precsim$ and $f$: :$f\left({x}\right) \precsim...
Let $R = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Let ${\it Ids}\left({R}\right)$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of all [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideals]] in $R$. Let $L = \left({ {\it Ids}\left({R}\right), \precsim}\right)$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]] w...
$f$ is well-defined because by [[Relation Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Ideal]]: :$\forall x \in S: x^r$ is [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideal]] in $L$ Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq y$ By [[Preceding implies Inclusion of Segments of Auxiliary Relation]]: :$x^r \subseteq y^r$ Thus by definitions of $...
Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_Mapping_is_Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_Mapping_is_Increasing
[ "Auxiliary Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping" ]
[ "Relation Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Ideal", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Preceding implies Inclusion of Segments of Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping" ]
proofwiki-11732
Constant to Power of Number of Distinct Prime Divisors is Multiplicative Function
Let $c \in \R$ be a constant. Let $f: \N \to \R$ denotes the mapping defined as: :$\forall n \in \N: \map f n = c^k$ where $k$ is number of distinct primes that divide $n$. Then $f$ is multiplicative.
Let $r, s \in \Z$ such that $r \perp s$. Let $r$ be composed of $p$ distinct primes: :$r_1, r_2, \ldots r_p$ Thus: :$\map f r = c^p$ Let $s$ be composed of $q$ distinct primes: :$s_1, s_2, \ldots s_q$ Thus: :$\map f s = c^q$ As $r \perp s$, all the $r_k$ and $s_k$ are distinct. Thus $r s$ is composed of: :the $p$ disti...
Let $c \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Constant|constant]]. Let $f: \N \to \R$ denotes the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] defined as: :$\forall n \in \N: \map f n = c^k$ where $k$ is [[Definition:Number|number]] of [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] that [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divid...
Let $r, s \in \Z$ such that $r \perp s$. Let $r$ be composed of $p$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]: :$r_1, r_2, \ldots r_p$ Thus: :$\map f r = c^p$ Let $s$ be composed of $q$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]: :$s_1, s_2, \ldots s_q$ Thus: :$\ma...
Constant to Power of Number of Distinct Prime Divisors is Multiplicative Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Constant_to_Power_of_Number_of_Distinct_Prime_Divisors_is_Multiplicative_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Constant_to_Power_of_Number_of_Distinct_Prime_Divisors_is_Multiplicative_Function
[ "Multiplicative Functions", "Number Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Number", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function" ]
[ "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Exponent Combination...
proofwiki-11733
Product of Multiplicative Functions is Multiplicative
Let $f: \N \to \C$ and $g: \N \to \C$ be multiplicative functions. Then their pointwise product: :$f \times g: \Z \to \Z: \forall s \in S: \map {\paren {f \times g} } s := \map f s \times \map g s$ is also multiplicative.
Let $f$ and $g$ be multiplicative. Let $m \perp n$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {f \times g} {m \times n} | r = \map f {m \times n} \times \map g {m \times n} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f m \times \map f n \times \map g m \times \map g n...
Let $f: \N \to \C$ and $g: \N \to \C$ be [[Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function|multiplicative functions]]. Then their [[Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions|pointwise product]]: :$f \times g: \Z \to \Z: \forall s \in S: \map {\paren {f \times g} } s := \map f s \times \map g s$ is ...
Let $f$ and $g$ be [[Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function|multiplicative]]. Let $m \perp n$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {f \times g} {m \times n} | r = \map f {m \times n} \times \map g {m \times n} | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map...
Product of Multiplicative Functions is Multiplicative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Multiplicative_Functions_is_Multiplicative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Multiplicative_Functions_is_Multiplicative
[ "Multiplicative Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions", "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function", "Integer Multiplication is Commutative", "Definition:Multiplicative Arithmetic Function" ]
proofwiki-11734
Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Element of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be an ordered set. Let $\map {\mathit {Ids} } R$ be the set of all ideals in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\mathit {Ids} } R, \precsim}$ be an ordered set where $\precsim \mathop = \subseteq {\restriction_{\map {\mathit {Ids} } R \times \map {\mathit {Ids} } R} }$. Let $r$ be an auxiliary ...
=== Condition $(1)$ === By Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Increasing: :$f$ is an increasing mapping. By Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Subset of Lower Closure: :$\forall x \in S: x^r \subseteq x^\preceq$ By definition of $f$: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x \subseteq x^\preceq$ Thus :$f \in F$ {{qed|lemma}}
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Let $\map {\mathit {Ids} } R$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of all [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideals]] in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\mathit {Ids} } R, \precsim}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]] where $\precsim ...
=== Condition $(1)$ === By [[Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Increasing]]: :$f$ is an [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]]. By [[Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Subset of Lower Closure]]: :$\forall x \in S: x^r \subseteq x^\preceq$ By definition of $f$: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x \subseteq...
Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Element of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_Mapping_is_Element_of_Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Segment_of_Auxiliary_Relation_Mapping_is_Element_of_Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure
[ "Auxiliary Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Smallest Element"...
[ "Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Increasing", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Subset of Lower Closure", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Segment of Auxiliary Relation is Subset of Lower Closure", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping" ]
proofwiki-11735
Singleton of Bottom is Ideal
Let $\struct {S, \preceq}$ be a bounded below ordered set. Then :$\set \bot$ is an ideal in $\struct {S, \preceq}$ where $\bot$ denotes the smallest element in $S$.
=== Non-empty === By definition of singleton: :$\bot \in \set \bot$ By definition: :$\set \bot$ is a non-empty set. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\struct {S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Then :$\set \bot$ is an [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideal]] in $\struct {S, \preceq}$ where $\bot$ denotes the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]] in $S$.
=== Non-empty === By definition of [[Definition:Singleton|singleton]]: :$\bot \in \set \bot$ By definition: :$\set \bot$ is a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]]. {{qed|lemma}}
Singleton of Bottom is Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_of_Bottom_is_Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_of_Bottom_is_Ideal
[ "Order Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Smallest Element" ]
[ "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Singleton" ]
proofwiki-11736
Number of Digits in Factorial
Let $n!$ denote the factorial of $n$. The number of digits in $n!$ is approximately: :$1 + \floor {\dfrac 1 2 \paren {\log_{10} 2 + \log_{10} \pi} + \dfrac 1 2 \log_{10} n + n \paren {\log_{10} n - \log_{10} e} }$ when $n!$ is shown in decimal notation. This evaluates to: :$1 + \floor {\paren {n + \dfrac 1 2} \log_{10}...
From Stirling's Formula: :$n! \sim \sqrt {2 \pi n} \paren {\dfrac n e}^n$ from which the result can be calculated. To count the number of digits: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \log_{10} n! | o = \sim | r = \log_{10} \paren {\sqrt {2 \pi n} \paren {\dfrac n e}^n} | c = Stirling's Formula }} {{eqn | r = \lo...
Let $n!$ denote the [[Definition:Factorial|factorial]] of $n$. The number of [[Definition:Digit|digits]] in $n!$ is approximately: :$1 + \floor {\dfrac 1 2 \paren {\log_{10} 2 + \log_{10} \pi} + \dfrac 1 2 \log_{10} n + n \paren {\log_{10} n - \log_{10} e} }$ when $n!$ is shown in [[Definition:Decimal Notation|decimal...
From [[Stirling's Formula]]: :$n! \sim \sqrt {2 \pi n} \paren {\dfrac n e}^n$ from which the result can be calculated. To count the number of [[Definition:Digit|digits]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \log_{10} n! | o = \sim | r = \log_{10} \paren {\sqrt {2 \pi n} \paren {\dfrac n e}^n} | c = [[Stirling...
Number of Digits in Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Digits_in_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Digits_in_Factorial
[ "Factorials" ]
[ "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Digit", "Definition:Decimal Notation" ]
[ "Stirling's Formula", "Definition:Digit", "Stirling's Formula", "Sum of Logarithms", "Logarithm of Power", "Sum of Logarithms", "Difference of Logarithms", "Common Logarithm/Examples/2", "Common Logarithm/Examples/pi", "Common Logarithm/Examples/e", "Number of Digits in Number", "Category:Fact...
proofwiki-11737
Rising Factorial in terms of Falling Factorial
:$x^{\overline n} = \paren {x + n - 1}^{\underline n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\overline n} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x + j} | c = {{Defof|Rising Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = x \paren {x + 1} \cdots \paren {x + n - 1} | c = {{Defof|Continued Product}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x + n - 1} \paren {x + n - 2} \cdots \paren {x + 1} x |...
:$x^{\overline n} = \paren {x + n - 1}^{\underline n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\overline n} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x + j} | c = {{Defof|Rising Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = x \paren {x + 1} \cdots \paren {x + n - 1} | c = {{Defof|Continued Product}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x + n - 1} \paren {x + n - 2} \cdots \paren {x + 1} x |...
Rising Factorial in terms of Falling Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rising_Factorial_in_terms_of_Falling_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rising_Factorial_in_terms_of_Falling_Factorial
[ "Falling Factorials", "Rising Factorials" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-11738
Rising Factorial in terms of Falling Factorial of Negative
:$x^{\overline k} = \paren {-1}^k \paren {-x}^{\underline k}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {-x}^{\underline k} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \paren {-x - j} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \paren {-1} \paren {x + j} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \paren {-1} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - ...
:$x^{\overline k} = \paren {-1}^k \paren {-x}^{\underline k}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {-x}^{\underline k} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \paren {-x - j} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \paren {-1} \paren {x + j} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \paren {-1} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - ...
Rising Factorial in terms of Falling Factorial of Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rising_Factorial_in_terms_of_Falling_Factorial_of_Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rising_Factorial_in_terms_of_Falling_Factorial_of_Negative
[ "Falling Factorials", "Rising Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Product of Products" ]
proofwiki-11739
Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials
:$x^{\underline n} = \dfrac {x!} {\paren {x - n}!} = \dfrac {\map \Gamma {x + 1} } {\map \Gamma {x - n + 1} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline n} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x - j} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = x \paren {x - 1} \paren {x - 2} \dotsm \paren {x - n + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {x!} {\paren {x - n}!} | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = \d...
:$x^{\underline n} = \dfrac {x!} {\paren {x - n}!} = \dfrac {\map \Gamma {x + 1} } {\map \Gamma {x - n + 1} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline n} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x - j} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = x \paren {x - 1} \paren {x - 2} \dotsm \paren {x - n + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {x!} {\paren {x - n}!} | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = \d...
Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Falling_Factorial_as_Quotient_of_Factorials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Falling_Factorial_as_Quotient_of_Factorials
[ "Falling Factorials", "Factorials" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-11740
One to Integer Rising is Integer Factorial
:$1^{\overline n} = n!$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1^{\overline n} | r = \dfrac {\paren {1 + n - 1}!} {\paren {1 - 1}!} | c = Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n!} {0!} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = Factorial of Zero }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Rising Factorials Category:Factorials 4...
:$1^{\overline n} = n!$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1^{\overline n} | r = \dfrac {\paren {1 + n - 1}!} {\paren {1 - 1}!} | c = [[Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n!} {0!} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = [[Factorial of Zero]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Rising Factorials]] [[Catego...
One to Integer Rising is Integer Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One_to_Integer_Rising_is_Integer_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One_to_Integer_Rising_is_Integer_Factorial
[ "Rising Factorials", "Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Factorial/Examples/0", "Category:Rising Factorials", "Category:Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11741
Number to Power of One Rising is Itself
:$x^{\overline 1} = x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\overline 1} | r = \dfrac {\map \Gamma {x + 1} } {\map \Gamma x} | c = Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials }} {{eqn | r = x | c = Gamma Difference Equation }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Rising Factorials sa1f6ul61j0vgsfk8waanaiyu8o7pg1
:$x^{\overline 1} = x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\overline 1} | r = \dfrac {\map \Gamma {x + 1} } {\map \Gamma x} | c = [[Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials]] }} {{eqn | r = x | c = [[Gamma Difference Equation]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Rising Factorials]] sa1f6ul61j0vgsfk8waanaiyu8o7pg1
Number to Power of One Rising is Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_One_Rising_is_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_One_Rising_is_Itself
[ "Rising Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Category:Rising Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11742
Integer to Power of Itself Falling is Factorial
:$n^{\underline n} = n!$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n^{\underline n} | r = \dfrac {n!} {\paren {n - n}!} | c = Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n!} {0!} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = Factorial of Zero }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Falling Factorials opk3w0uaoprxmpgvd9rzvqako48cfx9
:$n^{\underline n} = n!$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n^{\underline n} | r = \dfrac {n!} {\paren {n - n}!} | c = [[Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n!} {0!} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = [[Factorial of Zero]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Falling Factorials]] opk3w0uaoprxmpgvd9rzvq...
Integer to Power of Itself Falling is Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_to_Power_of_Itself_Falling_is_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_to_Power_of_Itself_Falling_is_Factorial
[ "Falling Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Factorial/Examples/0", "Category:Falling Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11743
Number to Power of One Falling is Itself
:$x^{\underline 1} = x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 1} | r = \dfrac {\Gamma \left({x + 1}\right)} {\Gamma \left({x - 1 + 1}\right)} | c = Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\Gamma \left({x + 1}\right)} {\Gamma \left({x}\right)} | c = }} {{eqn | r = x | c = Gamma Difference E...
:$x^{\underline 1} = x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 1} | r = \dfrac {\Gamma \left({x + 1}\right)} {\Gamma \left({x - 1 + 1}\right)} | c = [[Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\Gamma \left({x + 1}\right)} {\Gamma \left({x}\right)} | c = }} {{eqn | r = x | c = [[Gamma Differ...
Number to Power of One Falling is Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_One_Falling_is_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_One_Falling_is_Itself
[ "Falling Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Falling Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Category:Falling Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11744
Number of Permutations of One Less
:${}^{n - 1} P_n = {}^n P_n$ where ${}^k P_n$ denotes the number of ordered selections of $k$ objects from $n$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {}^{n - 1} P_n | r = \dfrac {n!} {\paren {n - \paren {n - 1} }!} | c = Number of Permutations }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n!} {1!} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = }} {{eqn | r = {}^n P_n | c = Number of Permutations }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:${}^{n - 1} P_n = {}^n P_n$ where ${}^k P_n$ denotes the number of [[Definition:Permutation (Ordered Selection)|ordered selections of $k$ objects from $n$]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {}^{n - 1} P_n | r = \dfrac {n!} {\paren {n - \paren {n - 1} }!} | c = [[Number of Permutations]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {n!} {1!} | c = }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = }} {{eqn | r = {}^n P_n | c = [[Number of Permutations]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Number of Permutations of One Less/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Permutations_of_One_Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Permutations_of_One_Less/Proof_1
[ "Number of Permutations of One Less", "Permutations (Ordered Selections)" ]
[ "Definition:Permutation/Ordered Selection" ]
[ "Number of Permutations", "Number of Permutations" ]
proofwiki-11745
Number of Permutations of One Less
:${}^{n - 1} P_n = {}^n P_n$ where ${}^k P_n$ denotes the number of ordered selections of $k$ objects from $n$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {}^{n - 1} P_n | r = n^{\underline {n - 1} } | c = Number of Permutations: $n^{\underline {n - 1} }$ denotes Falling Factorial }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = Integer to Power of Itself Less One Falling is Factorial }} {{eqn | r = {}^n P_n | c = Number of Permutations }} {{end-...
:${}^{n - 1} P_n = {}^n P_n$ where ${}^k P_n$ denotes the number of [[Definition:Permutation (Ordered Selection)|ordered selections of $k$ objects from $n$]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {}^{n - 1} P_n | r = n^{\underline {n - 1} } | c = [[Number of Permutations]]: $n^{\underline {n - 1} }$ denotes [[Definition:Falling Factorial|Falling Factorial]] }} {{eqn | r = n! | c = [[Integer to Power of Itself Less One Falling is Factorial]] }} {{eqn | r = {}^n P_n ...
Number of Permutations of One Less/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Permutations_of_One_Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Permutations_of_One_Less/Proof_2
[ "Number of Permutations of One Less", "Permutations (Ordered Selections)" ]
[ "Definition:Permutation/Ordered Selection" ]
[ "Number of Permutations", "Definition:Falling Factorial", "Integer to Power of Itself Less One Falling is Factorial", "Number of Permutations" ]
proofwiki-11746
Element of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure is Generated by Auxiliary Relation
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R$ be the set of all ideals in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R, \precsim}$ be an ordered set where $\precsim \mathop = \subseteq\restriction_{\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R \times \map {\operatorname{Id...
Define relation $\RR$ on $S$: :$\forall x, y \in S: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR \iff x \in \map f y$ We will prove that: :$(1): \quad \forall x, y \in S: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR \implies x \preceq y$ Let $x, y \in S$ such that: :$\tuple {x, y} \in \RR$ By definitions of $\RR$ and $F$: :$x \in \map f y \subseteq y^\preceq$ By d...
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of all [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideals]] in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R, \precsim}$...
Define [[Definition:Relation|relation]] $\RR$ on $S$: :$\forall x, y \in S: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR \iff x \in \map f y$ We will prove that: :$(1): \quad \forall x, y \in S: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR \implies x \preceq y$ Let $x, y \in S$ such that: :$\tuple {x, y} \in \RR$ By definitions of $\RR$ and $F$: :$x \in \map f ...
Element of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure is Generated by Auxiliary Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_of_Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure_is_Generated_by_Auxiliary_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_of_Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure_is_Generated_by_Auxiliary_Relation
[ "Auxiliary Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Relation Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Lower Closure/Element", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Lower Section", "Definition:Lower Section", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "...
proofwiki-11747
Binomial Coefficient with Two/Corollary
:$\forall n \in \N: \dbinom n 2 = T_{n - 1} = \dfrac {n \paren {n - 1} } 2$ where $T_n$ is the $n$th triangular number.
From the definition of binomial coefficient: :$\dbinom n 2 = \dfrac {n!} {2! \paren {n - 2}!}$ The result follows directly from the definition of the factorial: :$2! = 1 \times 2$ {{qed}}
:$\forall n \in \N: \dbinom n 2 = T_{n - 1} = \dfrac {n \paren {n - 1} } 2$ where $T_n$ is the [[Definition:Triangular Number|$n$th triangular number]].
From the definition of [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]]: :$\dbinom n 2 = \dfrac {n!} {2! \paren {n - 2}!}$ The result follows directly from the definition of the [[Definition:Factorial|factorial]]: :$2! = 1 \times 2$ {{qed}}
Binomial Coefficient with Two/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_with_Two/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_with_Two/Corollary
[ "Examples of Binomial Coefficients", "Triangular Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Factorial" ]
proofwiki-11748
Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure is Isomorphic to Auxiliary Relations
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R$ be the set of all ideals in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R, \precsim}$ be an ordered set where $\precsim \mathop = \subseteq\restriction_{\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R \times \map {\operatorname{Id...
By Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Element of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure define $G: \map {\operatorname{Aux} } R \to F$: :$\forall \RR \in \map {\operatorname{Aux} } R: \map G \RR = \paren {S \ni x \mapsto x^\RR}$ We will prove by Order Isomorphism is Surjective Order Embedding t...
Let $R = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of all [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideals]] in $R$. Let $L = \struct {\map {\operatorname{Ids} } R, \precsim}$...
By [[Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Element of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure]] define $G: \map {\operatorname{Aux} } R \to F$: :$\forall \RR \in \map {\operatorname{Aux} } R: \map G \RR = \paren {S \ni x \mapsto x^\RR}$ We will prove by [[Order Isomorphism is Surjective Order Embe...
Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure is Isomorphic to Auxiliary Relations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure_is_Isomorphic_to_Auxiliary_Relations
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Mappings_Satisfying_Inclusion_in_Lower_Closure_is_Isomorphic_to_Auxiliary_Relations
[ "Auxiliary Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Auxiliary Relation", "Definition:Ordered Set...
[ "Segment of Auxiliary Relation Mapping is Element of Increasing Mappings Satisfying Inclusion in Lower Closure", "Order Isomorphism is Surjective Order Embedding", "Definition:Order Isomorphism" ]
proofwiki-11749
Binomial Theorem/Abel's Generalisation
:$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k}$
By admitting $y = \paren {x + y} - x$, we have that: :$\paren {x + y}^n = \paren {x + \paren {x + y} - x}^n$ Expanding the {{RHS}} in powers of $\paren {x + y}$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom n k x \...
:$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k}$
By admitting $y = \paren {x + y} - x$, we have that: :$\paren {x + y}^n = \paren {x + \paren {x + y} - x}^n$ Expanding the {{RHS}} in powers of $\paren {x + y}$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom n k ...
Binomial Theorem/Abel's Generalisation/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Abel's_Generalisation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Abel's_Generalisation/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Theorem" ]
[]
[ "Binomial Theorem/Abel's Generalisation/x+y = 0", "Binomial Theorem" ]
proofwiki-11750
Binomial Theorem/Abel's Generalisation
:$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k}$
From this formula: :$(1): \quad \ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x \paren {x + k z}^{k - 1} y \paren {y + \paren {n - k} z}^{n - k - 1} = \paren {x + y} \paren {x + y + n z}^{n - 1}$ The given formula: :$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k}$ can then be tran...
:$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k}$
From [[Link required to result in Knuth: exercise 2.3.4.4-29|this formula]]: :$(1): \quad \ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x \paren {x + k z}^{k - 1} y \paren {y + \paren {n - k} z}^{n - k - 1} = \paren {x + y} \paren {x + y + n z}^{n - 1}$ The given formula: :$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {...
Binomial Theorem/Abel's Generalisation/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Abel's_Generalisation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Abel's_Generalisation/Proof_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Theorem" ]
[]
[ "Link required to result in Knuth: exercise 2.3.4.4-29" ]
proofwiki-11751
Binomial Theorem/Abel's Generalisation
:$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k}$
From Hurwitz's Generalisation of Binomial Theorem: :$(1): \quad \paren {x + y}^n = \ds \sum x \paren {x + \epsilon_1 z_1 + \cdots + \epsilon_n z_n}^{\epsilon_1 + \cdots + \epsilon_n - 1} \paren {y - \epsilon_1 z_1 - \cdots - \epsilon_n z_n}^{n - \epsilon_1 - \cdots - \epsilon_n}$ Setting $z = z_1 = z_2 = \cdots z_n$ we...
:$\ds \paren {x + y}^n = \sum_k \binom n k x \paren {x - k z}^{k - 1} \paren {y + k z}^{n - k}$
From [[Hurwitz's Generalisation of Binomial Theorem]]: :$(1): \quad \paren {x + y}^n = \ds \sum x \paren {x + \epsilon_1 z_1 + \cdots + \epsilon_n z_n}^{\epsilon_1 + \cdots + \epsilon_n - 1} \paren {y - \epsilon_1 z_1 - \cdots - \epsilon_n z_n}^{n - \epsilon_1 - \cdots - \epsilon_n}$ Setting $z = z_1 = z_2 = \cdots z_...
Binomial Theorem/Abel's Generalisation/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Abel's_Generalisation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Abel's_Generalisation/Proof_3
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Theorem" ]
[]
[ "Binomial Theorem/Hurwitz's Generalisation", "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients" ]
proofwiki-11752
Sum over k of r Choose m+k by s Choose n+k
Let $s \in \R, r \in \Z_{\ge 0}, m, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r {m + k} \binom s {n + k} = \binom {r + s} {r - m + n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_k \binom r {m + k} \binom s {n + k} | r = \sum_k \binom r {r - m - k} \binom s {s - n - k} | c = Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom r k \binom s {s - n - \left({r - m - k}\right)} | c = Change of Index Variable of Summation }} {{eqn | r ...
Let $s \in \R, r \in \Z_{\ge 0}, m, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r {m + k} \binom s {n + k} = \binom {r + s} {r - m + n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_k \binom r {m + k} \binom s {n + k} | r = \sum_k \binom r {r - m - k} \binom s {s - n - k} | c = [[Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients]] }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom r k \binom s {s - n - \left({r - m - k}\right)} | c = [[Change of Index Variable of Summation]] }} {{...
Sum over k of r Choose m+k by s Choose n+k/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_m+k_by_s_Choose_n+k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_m+k_by_s_Choose_n+k/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients", "Change of Index Variable of Summation", "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients", "Chu-Vandermonde Identity" ]
proofwiki-11753
Sum over k of r Choose k by s+k Choose n by -1^r-k
Let $s \in \R, r \in \Z_{\ge 0}, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s + k} n \paren {-1}^{r - k} = \binom s {n - r}$
The proof proceeds by induction on $r$. For all $r \in \Z_{>0}$, let $\map P r$ be the proposition: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s + k} n \paren {-1}^{r - k} = \binom s {n - r}$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_k \binom 0 k \binom {s + k} n \paren {-1}^{0 - k} ...
Let $s \in \R, r \in \Z_{\ge 0}, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s + k} n \paren {-1}^{r - k} = \binom s {n - r}$
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $r$. For all $r \in \Z_{>0}$, let $\map P r$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s + k} n \paren {-1}^{r - k} = \binom s {n - r}$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case: {{begin-eqn...
Sum over k of r Choose k by s+k Choose n by -1^r-k/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_s+k_Choose_n_by_-1^r-k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_s+k_Choose_n_by_-1^r-k/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of r Choose k by s+k Choose n by -1^r-k" ]
[]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Zero Choose n", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Pascal's Rule", "Sum over k of r Choose k by s+k Choose n by -1^r-k/Proof 1", "Pascal's Rule", "Translation of In...
proofwiki-11754
Sum over k of r-k Choose m by s+k Choose n
Let $m, n, r, s \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ such that $n \ge s$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {r - k} m \binom {s + k} n = \binom {r + s + 1} {m + n + 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {r - k} m \binom {s + k} n | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {-\left({m + 1}\right)} {r - k - m} \binom {-\left({n + 1}\right)} {s + k - m} \left({-1}\right)^{r - m + s - m} | c = Moving Top Index to Bottom in Binomial Co...
Let $m, n, r, s \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ such that $n \ge s$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {r - k} m \binom {s + k} n = \binom {r + s + 1} {m + n + 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {r - k} m \binom {s + k} n | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {-\left({m + 1}\right)} {r - k - m} \binom {-\left({n + 1}\right)} {s + k - m} \left({-1}\right)^{r - m + s - m} | c = [[Moving Top Index to Bottom in Binomial ...
Sum over k of r-k Choose m by s+k Choose n/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-k_Choose_m_by_s+k_Choose_n
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-k_Choose_m_by_s+k_Choose_n/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient/Corollary 2", "Chu-Vandermonde Identity", "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient/Corollary 2" ]
proofwiki-11755
Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk
Let $r, s, t \in \R, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \binom {r - t k} k \binom {s - t \paren {n - k} } {n - k} \frac r {r - t k} = \binom {r + s - t n} n$
For all $n \in \Z$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \binom {r - t k} k \binom {s - t \paren {n - k} } {n - k} \frac r {r - t k} = \binom {r + s - t n} n$ Let the {{LHS}} of this equation be denoted $\tuple {r, s, t, n}$. Let $n = 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \tuple {r...
Let $r, s, t \in \R, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \binom {r - t k} k \binom {s - t \paren {n - k} } {n - k} \frac r {r - t k} = \binom {r + s - t n} n$
For all $n \in \Z$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \binom {r - t k} k \binom {s - t \paren {n - k} } {n - k} \frac r {r - t k} = \binom {r + s - t n} n$ Let the {{LHS}} of this equation be denoted $\tuple {r, s, t, n}$. Let $n = 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{e...
Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-tk_Choose_k_by_s-t(n-k)_Choose_n-k_by_r_over_r-tk
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-tk_Choose_k_by_s-t(n-k)_Choose_n-k_by_r_over_r-tk/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Proposition", "N Choose Negative Number is Zero", "Binomial Coefficient with Zero", "Binomial Coefficient with Zero", "N Choose Negative Number is Zero", "N Choose Negative Number is Zero", "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Sum over k of r-tk Choose...
proofwiki-11756
Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk
Let $r, s, t \in \R, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \binom {r - t k} k \binom {s - t \paren {n - k} } {n - k} \frac r {r - t k} = \binom {r + s - t n} n$
From Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {r - k t} k$ by $\dfrac r {r - k t}$ by $z^k$: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} z^k = x^r$ where: :$\map {A_n} {x, t}$ is the polynomial of degree $n$ defined as: ::$\map {A_n} {x, t} := \dbinom {x - n t} n \dfrac x {x - n t}$ :for $x \ne n t$ :$z = x^{t + 1} - x^t$. From Sum over $k$ of $\d...
Let $r, s, t \in \R, n \in \Z$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \binom {r - t k} k \binom {s - t \paren {n - k} } {n - k} \frac r {r - t k} = \binom {r + s - t n} n$
From [[Sum over k of r-kt choose k by r over r-kt by z^k|Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {r - k t} k$ by $\dfrac r {r - k t}$ by $z^k$]]: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} z^k = x^r$ where: :$\map {A_n} {x, t}$ is the [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomial]] of [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree $n$]] defin...
Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-tk_Choose_k_by_s-t(n-k)_Choose_n-k_by_r_over_r-tk
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-tk_Choose_k_by_s-t(n-k)_Choose_n-k_by_r_over_r-tk/Proof_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk" ]
[]
[ "Sum over k of r-kt choose k by r over r-kt by z^k", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Sum over k of r-kt choose k by z^k" ]
proofwiki-11757
Sum over k of r Choose k by s Choose k by k
:$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom s k k = \binom {r + s - 1} {r - 1} s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_k \binom r k \binom s k k | r = \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s - 1} {k - 1} s | c = Factors of Binomial Coefficient }} {{eqn | r = s \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s - 1} {k - 1} | c = as $s$ is constant }} {{eqn | r = s \binom {r + s - 1} {r - 1} | c = Sum over $k$ of $\d...
:$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom s k k = \binom {r + s - 1} {r - 1} s$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_k \binom r k \binom s k k | r = \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s - 1} {k - 1} s | c = [[Factors of Binomial Coefficient]] }} {{eqn | r = s \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s - 1} {k - 1} | c = as $s$ is [[Definition:Constant|constant]] }} {{eqn | r = s \binom {r + s - 1} {r - 1} ...
Sum over k of r Choose k by s Choose k by k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_s_Choose_k_by_k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_s_Choose_k_by_k
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Constant", "Sum over k of r Choose m+k by s Choose n+k" ]
proofwiki-11758
Relation Segment is Increasing
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\RR, \QQ$ be relations on $S$ such that :$\RR \subseteq \QQ$ Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^\RR \subseteq x^\QQ$ where $x^\RR$ denotes the $\RR$-segment of $x$.
Let $y \in x^\RR$. By definition of $\RR$-segment: :$\tuple {y, x} \in \RR$ By definition of subset: :$\tuple {y, x} \in \QQ$ Thus by definition of $\QQ$-segment: :$y \in x^\QQ$ {{qed}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\RR, \QQ$ be [[Definition:Relation|relations]] on $S$ such that :$\RR \subseteq \QQ$ Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^\RR \subseteq x^\QQ$ where $x^\RR$ denotes the [[Definition:Relation Segment|$\RR$-segment]] of $x$.
Let $y \in x^\RR$. By definition of [[Definition:Relation Segment|$\RR$-segment]]: :$\tuple {y, x} \in \RR$ By definition of [[Definition:Subset|subset]]: :$\tuple {y, x} \in \QQ$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Relation Segment|$\QQ$-segment]]: :$y \in x^\QQ$ {{qed}}
Relation Segment is Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relation_Segment_is_Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relation_Segment_is_Increasing
[ "Relation Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Relation Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Relation Segment", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Relation Segment" ]
proofwiki-11759
Sum over k of n+k Choose 2 k by 2 k Choose k by -1^k over k+1
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \sqbrk {n = 0}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\left({-1}\right)^k} {k + 1} | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} k \binom n k \frac {\left({-1}\right)} {k + 1} | c = Product of $\dbinom r m$ with $\dbinom m k$ }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} k \binom {n ...
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \sqbrk {n = 0}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\left({-1}\right)^k} {k + 1} | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} k \binom n k \frac {\left({-1}\right)} {k + 1} | c = [[Product of r Choose m with m Choose k|Product of $\dbinom r m$ with $\dbinom m k$]] }} {{eq...
Sum over k of n+k Choose 2 k by 2 k Choose k by -1^k over k+1/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_2_k_by_2_k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_2_k_by_2_k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of n+k Choose 2 k by 2 k Choose k by -1^k over k+1" ]
[]
[ "Product of r Choose m with m Choose k", "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Sum over k of r Choose k by s+k Choose n by -1^r-k" ]
proofwiki-11760
Sum over k of n+k Choose 2 k by 2 k Choose k by -1^k over k+1
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \sqbrk {n = 0}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\left({-1}\right)^k} {k + 1} | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} k \binom n k \frac {\left({-1}\right)} {k + 1} | c = Product of $\dbinom r m$ with $\dbinom m k$ }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} k \binom {n ...
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \sqbrk {n = 0}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} {2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\left({-1}\right)^k} {k + 1} | o = | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom {n + k} k \binom n k \frac {\left({-1}\right)} {k + 1} | c = [[Product of r Choose m with m Choose k|Product of $\dbinom r m$ with $\dbinom m k$]] }} {{eq...
Sum over k of n+k Choose 2 k by 2 k Choose k by -1^k over k+1/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_2_k_by_2_k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_2_k_by_2_k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1/Proof_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of n+k Choose 2 k by 2 k Choose k by -1^k over k+1" ]
[]
[ "Product of r Choose m with m Choose k", "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient", "Sum over k of r Choose m+k by s Choose n+k" ]
proofwiki-11761
Sum over k of n+k Choose m+2k by 2k Choose k by -1^k over k+1
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {m + 2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \binom {n - 1} {m - 1}$
From Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {r - k} m \dbinom {s + k} n$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {r - k} m \binom {s + k} n = \binom {r + s + 1} {m + n + 1}$ Setting $r = n + k - 1$, $m = 2 k$, $s = 0$, $n = m - 1$ and using $j$ as the index variable, this gives us: :$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^{n + k - 1} \binom {n + k -...
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {m + 2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \binom {n - 1} {m - 1}$
From [[Sum over k of r-k Choose m by s+k Choose n|Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {r - k} m \dbinom {s + k} n$]]: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^r \binom {r - k} m \binom {s + k} n = \binom {r + s + 1} {m + n + 1}$ Setting $r = n + k - 1$, $m = 2 k$, $s = 0$, $n = m - 1$ and using $j$ as the [[Definition:Index Variable of Summa...
Sum over k of n+k Choose m+2k by 2k Choose k by -1^k over k+1/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_m+2k_by_2k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_m+2k_by_2k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of n+k Choose m+2k by 2k Choose k by -1^k over k+1" ]
[]
[ "Sum over k of r-k Choose m by s+k Choose n", "Definition:Summation/Index Variable", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Summation", "Sum over k of n+k Choose 2 k by 2 k Choose k by -1^k over k+1", "Definition:Kronecker Delta" ]
proofwiki-11762
Sum over k of n+k Choose m+2k by 2k Choose k by -1^k over k+1
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {m + 2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \binom {n - 1} {m - 1}$
Let: :$\ds S := \sum_k \binom {n + k} {m + 2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom {2 k + 1} {k + 1} | r = \binom {2 k} k \frac {2 k + 1} {k + 1} | c = Factors of Binomial Coefficient }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \binom {2 k} k | r = \binom {2 k...
:$\ds \sum_k \binom {n + k} {m + 2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1} = \binom {n - 1} {m - 1}$
Let: :$\ds S := \sum_k \binom {n + k} {m + 2 k} \binom {2 k} k \frac {\paren {-1}^k} {k + 1}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom {2 k + 1} {k + 1} | r = \binom {2 k} k \frac {2 k + 1} {k + 1} | c = [[Factors of Binomial Coefficient]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \binom {2 k} k | r = \binom...
Sum over k of n+k Choose m+2k by 2k Choose k by -1^k over k+1/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_m+2k_by_2k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n+k_Choose_m+2k_by_2k_Choose_k_by_-1^k_over_k+1/Proof_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of n+k Choose m+2k by 2k Choose k by -1^k over k+1" ]
[]
[ "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients", "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient/Corollary 2", "Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk", "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient", "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients" ]
proofwiki-11763
Intersection of Ideals with Suprema Succeed Element equals Way Below Closure of Element
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a complete lattice. Let $x \in S$. Then: :$\ds \bigcap \set {I \in \mathit {Ids}: x \preceq \sup I} = x^\ll$ where $\mathit {Ids}$ denotes the set of all ideals in $L$.
By Supremum of Lower Closure of Element: :$\map \sup {x^\preceq} = x$ By Lower Closure of Element is Ideal: :$x^\preceq \in \mathit {Ids}$ Then by definition of reflexivity: :$x^\preceq \in \set {I \in \mathit {Ids}: x \preceq \sup I}$ We will prove that: :$\ds \bigcap \set {I \in \mathit {Ids}: x \preceq \sup I} \subs...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattice]]. Let $x \in S$. Then: :$\ds \bigcap \set {I \in \mathit {Ids}: x \preceq \sup I} = x^\ll$ where $\mathit {Ids}$ denotes the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set]] of all [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideals]] in $L$.
By [[Supremum of Lower Closure of Element]]: :$\map \sup {x^\preceq} = x$ By [[Lower Closure of Element is Ideal]]: :$x^\preceq \in \mathit {Ids}$ Then by definition of [[Definition:Reflexivity|reflexivity]]: :$x^\preceq \in \set {I \in \mathit {Ids}: x \preceq \sup I}$ We will prove that: :$\ds \bigcap \set {I \in ...
Intersection of Ideals with Suprema Succeed Element equals Way Below Closure of Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Ideals_with_Suprema_Succeed_Element_equals_Way_Below_Closure_of_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Ideals_with_Suprema_Succeed_Element_equals_Way_Below_Closure_of_Element
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set" ]
[ "Supremum of Lower Closure of Element", "Lower Closure of Element is Ideal", "Definition:Reflexivity", "Definition:Set Intersection/Set of Sets", "Way Below iff Second Operand Preceding Supremum of Ideal implies First Operand is Element of Ideal", "Definition:Way Below Closure", "Definition:Set Equality...
proofwiki-11764
Way Below Closure is Ideal in Bounded Below Join Semilattice
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^\ll$ is ideal in $L$.
By Way Below Closure is Directed in Bounded Below Join Semilattice: :$x^\ll$ is a non-empty directed set. Let $y \in x^\ll, z \in S$ such that :$z \preceq y$ By definition of way below closure: :$y \ll x$ By definition of reflexivity: :$x \preceq x$ By Preceding and Way Below implies Way Below: :$z \ll x$ Thus by defin...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $x \in S$. Then :$x^\ll$ is [[Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set|ideal]] in $L$.
By [[Way Below Closure is Directed in Bounded Below Join Semilattice]]: :$x^\ll$ is a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed set]]. Let $y \in x^\ll, z \in S$ such that :$z \preceq y$ By definition of [[Definition:Way Below Closure|way below closure]]: :$y \ll x$ By definition o...
Way Below Closure is Ideal in Bounded Below Join Semilattice
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Below_Closure_is_Ideal_in_Bounded_Below_Join_Semilattice
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Way_Below_Closure_is_Ideal_in_Bounded_Below_Join_Semilattice
[ "Join and Meet Semilattices", "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Ideal in Ordered Set" ]
[ "Way Below Closure is Directed in Bounded Below Join Semilattice", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Way Below Closure", "Definition:Reflexivity", "Preceding and Way Below implies Way Below", "Definition:Way Below Closure", "Definition:Lower Section", "Definition:...
proofwiki-11765
Sum over k of r-kt Choose k by r over r-kt by s-(n-k)t Choose n-k by s over s-(n-k)t
For $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} \map {A_{n - k} } {s, t} = \map {A_n} {r + s, t}$ where $\map {A_n} {x, t}$ is the polynomial of degree $n$ defined as: :$\map {A_n} {x, t} = \dbinom {x - n t} n \dfrac x {x - n t}$ where $x \ne n t$.
Let: :$\ds S = \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} \map {A_{n - k} } {s, t}$ Both sides of the statement of the theorem are polynomials in $r$, $s$ and $t$. Therefore it can be assumed that $r \ne k t \ne s$ for $0 \le k \le n$ or something will become undefined. By replacing the polynomials $A_n$ with their binomial coefficient ...
For $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} \map {A_{n - k} } {s, t} = \map {A_n} {r + s, t}$ where $\map {A_n} {x, t}$ is the [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomial]] of [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree]] $n$ defined as: :$\map {A_n} {x, t} = \dbinom {x - n t} n \dfrac x {x - n t}$ w...
Let: :$\ds S = \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} \map {A_{n - k} } {s, t}$ Both sides of the statement of the theorem are [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomials]] in $r$, $s$ and $t$. Therefore it can be assumed that $r \ne k t \ne s$ for $0 \le k \le n$ or something will become undefined. By replacing the [[D...
Sum over k of r-kt Choose k by r over r-kt by s-(n-k)t Choose n-k by s over s-(n-k)t/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-kt_Choose_k_by_r_over_r-kt_by_s-(n-k)t_Choose_n-k_by_s_over_s-(n-k)t
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-kt_Choose_k_by_r_over_r-kt_by_s-(n-k)t_Choose_n-k_by_s_over_s-(n-k)t/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of r-kt Choose k by r over r-kt by s-(n-k)t Choose n-k by s over s-(n-k)t" ]
[ "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial" ]
[ "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Partial Fractions Expansion", "Sum over k of r-tk Choose k by s-t(n-k) Choose n-k by r over r-tk" ]
proofwiki-11766
Sum over k of r-kt Choose k by r over r-kt by s-(n-k)t Choose n-k by s over s-(n-k)t
For $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} \map {A_{n - k} } {s, t} = \map {A_n} {r + s, t}$ where $\map {A_n} {x, t}$ is the polynomial of degree $n$ defined as: :$\map {A_n} {x, t} = \dbinom {x - n t} n \dfrac x {x - n t}$ where $x \ne n t$.
From Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {r - k t} k$ by $\dfrac r {r - k t}$ by $z^k$: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} z^k = x^r$ and: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {s, t} z^k = x^s$ Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{r + s} | r = \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} z^k \sum_k \map {A_k} {s, t} z^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \map {...
For $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} \map {A_{n - k} } {s, t} = \map {A_n} {r + s, t}$ where $\map {A_n} {x, t}$ is the [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomial]] of [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree]] $n$ defined as: :$\map {A_n} {x, t} = \dbinom {x - n t} n \dfrac x {x - n t}$ w...
From [[Sum over k of r-kt choose k by r over r-kt by z^k|Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {r - k t} k$ by $\dfrac r {r - k t}$ by $z^k$]]: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} z^k = x^r$ and: :$\ds \sum_k \map {A_k} {s, t} z^k = x^s$ Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{r + s} | r = \sum_k \map {A_k} {r, t} z^k \sum_k \ma...
Sum over k of r-kt Choose k by r over r-kt by s-(n-k)t Choose n-k by s over s-(n-k)t/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-kt_Choose_k_by_r_over_r-kt_by_s-(n-k)t_Choose_n-k_by_s_over_s-(n-k)t
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r-kt_Choose_k_by_r_over_r-kt_by_s-(n-k)t_Choose_n-k_by_s_over_s-(n-k)t/Proof_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of r-kt Choose k by r over r-kt by s-(n-k)t Choose n-k by s over s-(n-k)t" ]
[ "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial" ]
[ "Sum over k of r-kt choose k by r over r-kt by z^k" ]
proofwiki-11767
Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial
Let $r \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \paren {-1}^{r - k} \map {P_r} k = r! \, b_r$ where: :$\map {P_r} k = b_0 + b_1 k + \cdots + b_r k^r$ is a polynomial in $k$ of degree $r$.
From the {{Corollary|Sum over k of r Choose k by s+k Choose n by -1^r-k|disp = Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom r k \dbinom {s + k} n \paren {-1}^{r - k}$}}: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom k n \paren {-1}^{r - k} = \delta_{n r}$ where $\delta_{n r}$ denotes the Kronecker delta. Thus when $n \ne r$: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \bin...
Let $r \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \paren {-1}^{r - k} \map {P_r} k = r! \, b_r$ where: :$\map {P_r} k = b_0 + b_1 k + \cdots + b_r k^r$ is a [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomial]] in $k$ of [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree]] $r$.
From the {{Corollary|Sum over k of r Choose k by s+k Choose n by -1^r-k|disp = Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom r k \dbinom {s + k} n \paren {-1}^{r - k}$}}: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom k n \paren {-1}^{r - k} = \delta_{n r}$ where $\delta_{n r}$ denotes the [[Definition:Kronecker Delta|Kronecker delta]]. Thus when $n \n...
Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_-1^r-k_by_Polynomial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_-1^r-k_by_Polynomial/Proof_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial" ]
[ "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial" ]
[ "Definition:Kronecker Delta", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Definition:Degree of ...
proofwiki-11768
Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial
Let $r \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \paren {-1}^{r - k} \map {P_r} k = r! \, b_r$ where: :$\map {P_r} k = b_0 + b_1 k + \cdots + b_r k^r$ is a polynomial in $k$ of degree $r$.
From Summation of Powers over Product of Differences: :$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \begin {pmatrix} {\dfrac { {x_j}^r} {\ds \prod_{\substack {1 \mathop \le k \mathop \le n \\ k \mathop \ne j} } \paren {x_j - x_k} } } \end {pmatrix} = \begin {cases} 0 & : 0 \le r < n - 1 \\ 1 & : r = n - 1 \\ \ds \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n ...
Let $r \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \paren {-1}^{r - k} \map {P_r} k = r! \, b_r$ where: :$\map {P_r} k = b_0 + b_1 k + \cdots + b_r k^r$ is a [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomial]] in $k$ of [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree]] $r$.
From [[Summation of Powers over Product of Differences]]: :$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \begin {pmatrix} {\dfrac { {x_j}^r} {\ds \prod_{\substack {1 \mathop \le k \mathop \le n \\ k \mathop \ne j} } \paren {x_j - x_k} } } \end {pmatrix} = \begin {cases} 0 & : 0 \le r < n - 1 \\ 1 & : r = n - 1 \\ \ds \sum_{j \mathop = 1...
Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_-1^r-k_by_Polynomial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_-1^r-k_by_Polynomial/Proof_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial" ]
[ "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial" ]
[ "Summation of Powers over Product of Differences" ]
proofwiki-11769
Sum over k of r Choose k by s-kt Choose r by -1^k
Let $r \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s - k t} r \paren {-1}^k = t^r$ where $\dbinom r k$ etc. are binomial coefficients.
From Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom r k \paren {-1}^k$ by Polynomial: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \paren {-1}^{r - k} \map {P_r} k = r! \, b_r$ where: :$\map {P_r} k = b_0 + b_1 k + \cdots + b_r k^r$ is a polynomial in $k$ of degree $r$. {{proof wanted}}
Let $r \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \binom {s - k t} r \paren {-1}^k = t^r$ where $\dbinom r k$ etc. are [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficients]].
From [[Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial|Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom r k \paren {-1}^k$ by Polynomial]]: :$\ds \sum_k \binom r k \paren {-1}^{r - k} \map {P_r} k = r! \, b_r$ where: :$\map {P_r} k = b_0 + b_1 k + \cdots + b_r k^r$ is a [[Definition:Polynomial over Real Numbers|polynomial]] in $k$ of [[Defi...
Sum over k of r Choose k by s-kt Choose r by -1^k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_s-kt_Choose_r_by_-1^k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_r_Choose_k_by_s-kt_Choose_r_by_-1^k
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Sum over k of r Choose k by -1^r-k by Polynomial", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial" ]
proofwiki-11770
Sum over k of -2 Choose k
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom {-2} k = \paren {-1}^n \ceiling {\dfrac {n + 1} 2}$ where: :$\dbinom {-2} k$ is a binomial coefficient :$\ceiling x$ denotes the ceiling of $x$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom {-2} k | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1} \binom {k - \paren {-2} - 1} k | c = Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1} \binom {k + 1} k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \pare...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom {-2} k = \paren {-1}^n \ceiling {\dfrac {n + 1} 2}$ where: :$\dbinom {-2} k$ is a [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]] :$\ceiling x$ denotes the [[Definition:Ceiling Function|ceiling]] of $x$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom {-2} k | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1} \binom {k - \paren {-2} - 1} k | c = [[Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient]] }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1} \binom {k + 1} k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \...
Sum over k of -2 Choose k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_-2_Choose_k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_-2_Choose_k
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Ceiling Function" ]
[ "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient", "Binomial Coefficient with Self minus One", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Closed Fo...
proofwiki-11771
Sum over k of m Choose k by k minus m over 2
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k \paren {k - \dfrac m 2} = -\dfrac m 2 \binom {m - 1} n$ where $\dbinom m k$ etc. are binomial coefficients.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k \paren {k - \dfrac m 2} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n k \binom m k - \dfrac m 2 \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n m \binom {m - 1} {k - 1} - \dfrac m 2 \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k | c = Factor...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k \paren {k - \dfrac m 2} = -\dfrac m 2 \binom {m - 1} n$ where $\dbinom m k$ etc. are [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficients]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k \paren {k - \dfrac m 2} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n k \binom m k - \dfrac m 2 \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n m \binom {m - 1} {k - 1} - \dfrac m 2 \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom m k | c = [[Fact...
Sum over k of m Choose k by k minus m over 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_m_Choose_k_by_k_minus_m_over_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_m_Choose_k_by_k_minus_m_over_2
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Pascal's Rule", "Definition:Telescoping Series" ]
proofwiki-11772
Binomial Coefficient is instance of Gaussian Binomial Coefficient
Let $\dbinom r m_q$ denote the Gaussian binomial coefficient: Then: :$\ds \lim_{q \mathop \to 1^-} \dbinom r m_q = \dbinom r m$ where $\dbinom r m$ denotes the conventional binomial coefficient.
We have by definition of Gaussian binomial coefficient: :$\ds \dbinom r m_q = \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{r - k} } {1 - q^{k + 1} }$ Consider a typical factor of this continued product: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac {1 - q^{r - k} } {1 - q^{k + 1} } | r = \dfrac {\paren {1 - q^{r - k} } / \par...
Let $\dbinom r m_q$ denote the [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]]: Then: :$\ds \lim_{q \mathop \to 1^-} \dbinom r m_q = \dbinom r m$ where $\dbinom r m$ denotes the conventional [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]].
We have by definition of [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]]: :$\ds \dbinom r m_q = \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{r - k} } {1 - q^{k + 1} }$ Consider a typical [[Definition:Factor (Algebra)|factor]] of this [[Definition:Continued Product|continued product]]: {{be...
Binomial Coefficient is instance of Gaussian Binomial Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_is_instance_of_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_is_instance_of_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficient
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Continued Product", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Translation of Index Variable of Product" ]
proofwiki-11773
Multinomial Coefficient expressed as Product of Binomial Coefficients
:$\dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1, k_2, \ldots, k_m} = \dbinom {k_1 + k_2} {k_1} \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + k_3} {k_1 + k_2} \cdots \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_{m - 1} }$ where: :$\dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1, k_2, \ldots, k_m}$ denotes a multinomial coefficient :$\dbinom {k_...
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $m \in \Z_{> 1}$, let $\map P m$ be the proposition: :$\dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1, k_2, \ldots, k_m} = \dbinom {k_1 + k_2} {k_1} \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + k_3} {k_1 + k_2} \cdots \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_{m - 1} }$
:$\dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1, k_2, \ldots, k_m} = \dbinom {k_1 + k_2} {k_1} \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + k_3} {k_1 + k_2} \cdots \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_{m - 1} }$ where: :$\dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1, k_2, \ldots, k_m}$ denotes a [[Definition:Multinomial Coefficient...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $m \in \Z_{> 1}$, let $\map P m$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_m} {k_1, k_2, \ldots, k_m} = \dbinom {k_1 + k_2} {k_1} \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + k_3} {k_1 + k_2} \cdots \dbinom {k_1 + k_2 + \cd...
Multinomial Coefficient expressed as Product of Binomial Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multinomial_Coefficient_expressed_as_Product_of_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multinomial_Coefficient_expressed_as_Product_of_Binomial_Coefficients
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Multinomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Multinomial Coefficient", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-11774
Equivalence of Definitions of Semantic Equivalence for Predicate Logic
Let $\mathbf A, \mathbf B$ be WFFs of predicate logic. {{TFAE|def = Semantic Equivalence for Predicate Logic|view = semantic equivalence|context = Predicate Logic|contextview = predicate logic}}
Let $\AA$ be a structure for predicate logic. Let $\sigma$ be an assignment for $\mathbf A \iff \mathbf B$ in $\AA$. Then the value of $\mathbf A \iff \mathbf B$ under $\sigma$ is given by: :$\map {f^\leftrightarrow} {\map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} {\mathbf A} \sqbrk \sigma, \map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} {\mathbf B} \sq...
Let $\mathbf A, \mathbf B$ be [[Definition:WFF of Predicate Logic|WFFs of predicate logic]]. {{TFAE|def = Semantic Equivalence for Predicate Logic|view = semantic equivalence|context = Predicate Logic|contextview = predicate logic}}
Let $\AA$ be a [[Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic|structure for predicate logic]]. Let $\sigma$ be an [[Definition:Assignment for Formula|assignment]] for $\mathbf A \iff \mathbf B$ in $\AA$. Then the [[Definition:Value of Formula under Assignment|value of $\mathbf A \iff \mathbf B$ under $\sigma$]] is given...
Equivalence of Definitions of Semantic Equivalence for Predicate Logic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Semantic_Equivalence_for_Predicate_Logic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Semantic_Equivalence_for_Predicate_Logic
[ "Definitions/Semantic Equivalence for Predicate Logic" ]
[ "Definition:Language of Predicate Logic/Formal Grammar" ]
[ "Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic", "Definition:Assignment for Structure/Formula", "Definition:Value of Formula under Assignment", "Definition:Biconditional/Truth Function", "Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic/Formal Semantics/Well-Formed Formula", "Definition:Tautology/Formal Semantics/Pred...
proofwiki-11775
Universal Closures are Semantically Equivalent
Let $\mathbf A$ be a WFF of predicate logic. Let $\mathbf B, \mathbf B'$ be universal closures of $\mathbf A$. Then $\mathbf B$ and $\mathbf B'$ are semantically equivalent.
Let $\AA$ be a structure for predicate logic. Let $\mathbf B$ be any universal closure of $\mathbf A$. Then $\mathbf B$ is a sentence of the form: :$\forall x_1: \cdots \forall x_n: \mathbf A$ By definition of the models relation: :$\AA \models_{\mathrm{PL}} \mathbf B$ {{iff}} $\map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} {\mathbf B}...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:WFF of Predicate Logic|WFF of predicate logic]]. Let $\mathbf B, \mathbf B'$ be [[Definition:Universal Closure of Well-Formed Formula|universal closures]] of $\mathbf A$. Then $\mathbf B$ and $\mathbf B'$ are [[Definition:Semantic Equivalence (Predicate Logic)|semantically equivalen...
Let $\AA$ be a [[Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic|structure for predicate logic]]. Let $\mathbf B$ be any [[Definition:Universal Closure of Well-Formed Formula|universal closure]] of $\mathbf A$. Then $\mathbf B$ is a [[Definition:Sentence|sentence]] of the form: :$\forall x_1: \cdots \forall x_n: \mathbf A...
Universal Closures are Semantically Equivalent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Closures_are_Semantically_Equivalent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Closures_are_Semantically_Equivalent
[ "Predicate Logic" ]
[ "Definition:Language of Predicate Logic/Formal Grammar", "Definition:Universal Closure of Well-Formed Formula", "Definition:Semantic Equivalence/Predicate Logic" ]
[ "Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic", "Definition:Universal Closure of Well-Formed Formula", "Definition:Classes of WFFs/Sentence", "Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic/Formal Semantics/Sentence", "Definition:Value of Formula under Assignment", "Definition:Extension of Assignment", "Value of ...
proofwiki-11776
Meet-Continuous iff if Element Precedes Supremum of Directed Subset then Element equals Supremum of Meet of Element by Directed Subset
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be an up-complete lattice. Then :$L$ is meet-continuous {{iff}}: :$\forall x \in S$, the directed subset $D$ of $S: x \preceq \sup D \implies x = \sup \set {x \wedge d: d \in D}$
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $L$ be meet-continuous. Let $x$ be an element of $S$, $D$ be a directed subset of $S$ such that :$x \preceq \sup D$ Thus {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = x \wedge \sup D | c = Preceding iff Meet equals Less Operand }} {{eqn | r = \sup \set {x \wedge d: d \in D} | c = ...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be an [[Definition:Up-Complete|up-complete]] [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattice]]. Then :$L$ is [[Definition:Meet-Continuous Lattice|meet-continuous]] {{iff}}: :$\forall x \in S$, the [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed subset]] $D$ of $S: x \preceq \sup D \impl...
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $L$ be [[Definition:Meet-Continuous Lattice|meet-continuous]]. Let $x$ be an [[Definition:Element|element]] of $S$, $D$ be a [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed subset]] of $S$ such that :$x \preceq \sup D$ Thus {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = x \wedge \sup D | c = [[...
Meet-Continuous iff if Element Precedes Supremum of Directed Subset then Element equals Supremum of Meet of Element by Directed Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Meet-Continuous_iff_if_Element_Precedes_Supremum_of_Directed_Subset_then_Element_equals_Supremum_of_Meet_of_Element_by_Directed_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Meet-Continuous_iff_if_Element_Precedes_Supremum_of_Directed_Subset_then_Element_equals_Supremum_of_Meet_of_Element_by_Directed_Subset
[ "Meet-Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Up-Complete", "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Meet-Continuous Lattice", "Definition:Directed Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Meet-Continuous Lattice", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Preceding iff Meet equals Less Operand", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Meet-Continuous Lattice" ]
proofwiki-11777
Continuous Lattice is Meet-Continuous
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a bounded below continuous lattice. Then $L$ is meet-continuous.
Let $x \in S$, $D$ be a directed subset of $S$ such that :$x \preceq \sup D$ By Way Below Closure is Directed in Bounded Below Join Semilattice: :$x^\ll$ is directed. By definition of continuous: :$L$ is up-complete and satisfies the axiom of approximation. By definition of up-complete: :$x^\ll$ admits a supremum. By L...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below|bounded below]] [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]] [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattice]]. Then $L$ is [[Definition:Meet-Continuous Lattice|meet-continuous]].
Let $x \in S$, $D$ be a [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed subset]] of $S$ such that :$x \preceq \sup D$ By [[Way Below Closure is Directed in Bounded Below Join Semilattice]]: :$x^\ll$ is [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed]]. By definition of [[Definition:Continuous Ordered Set|continuous]]: :$L$ is [[Definiti...
Continuous Lattice is Meet-Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Lattice_is_Meet-Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Lattice_is_Meet-Continuous
[ "Meet-Continuous Lattices", "Continuous Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Meet-Continuous Lattice" ]
[ "Definition:Directed Subset", "Way Below Closure is Directed in Bounded Below Join Semilattice", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Continuous Ordered Set", "Definition:Up-Complete", "Axiom:Axiom of Approximation", "Definition:Up-Complete", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Lower Closure of Elem...
proofwiki-11778
Number to Power of Zero Rising is One
:$x^{\overline 0} = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\overline 0} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{-1} \paren {x + j} | c = {{Defof|Rising Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 | c = Product is Vacuous }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Rising Factorials 1tfwsij49sdapn8zmyovlleahasydr4
:$x^{\overline 0} = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\overline 0} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{-1} \paren {x + j} | c = {{Defof|Rising Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 | c = Product is [[Definition:Vacuous Product|Vacuous]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Rising Factorials]] 1tfwsij49sdapn8zmyovlleahasydr4
Number to Power of Zero Rising is One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_Zero_Rising_is_One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_Zero_Rising_is_One
[ "Rising Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Continued Product/Vacuous Product", "Category:Rising Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11779
Number to Power of Zero Falling is One
:$x^{\underline 0} = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 0} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{-1} \paren {x - j} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 | c = Product is Vacuous }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Falling Factorials 0thb0bl3pugwn0hxx3fa89xkjtu0dbp
:$x^{\underline 0} = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 0} | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{-1} \paren {x - j} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 | c = Product is [[Definition:Vacuous Product|Vacuous]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Falling Factorials]] 0thb0bl3pugwn0hxx3fa89xkjtu0dbp
Number to Power of Zero Falling is One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_Zero_Falling_is_One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_to_Power_of_Zero_Falling_is_One
[ "Falling Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Continued Product/Vacuous Product", "Category:Falling Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11780
Product of Number by its Falling Factorial
Let $x^{\underline n}$ denote the $n$th falling factorial power of $x$. Then: :$x x^{\underline n} = x^{\underline {n + 1} } + n x^{\underline n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x x^{\underline n} | r = \paren {x - n + n} x^{\underline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x - n} x^{\underline n} + n x^{\underline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x - n} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x - j} + n x^{\underline n} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial...
Let $x^{\underline n}$ denote the [[Definition:Falling Factorial|$n$th falling factorial power]] of $x$. Then: :$x x^{\underline n} = x^{\underline {n + 1} } + n x^{\underline n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x x^{\underline n} | r = \paren {x - n + n} x^{\underline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x - n} x^{\underline n} + n x^{\underline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x - n} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x - j} + n x^{\underline n} | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial...
Product of Number by its Falling Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Number_by_its_Falling_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Number_by_its_Falling_Factorial
[ "Falling Factorials" ]
[ "Definition:Falling Factorial" ]
[ "Category:Falling Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11781
Product of Number by its Rising Factorial
Let $x^{\overline n}$ denote the $n$th rising factorial power of $x$. Then: :$x x^{\overline n} = x^{\overline {n + 1} } - n x^{\overline n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x x^{\overline n} | r = \paren {x + n - n} x^{\overline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x + n} x^{\overline n} - n x^{\overline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x + n} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x + j} - n x^{\overline n} | c = {{Defof|Rising Factorial}} }} ...
Let $x^{\overline n}$ denote the [[Definition:Rising Factorial|$n$th rising factorial power]] of $x$. Then: :$x x^{\overline n} = x^{\overline {n + 1} } - n x^{\overline n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x x^{\overline n} | r = \paren {x + n - n} x^{\overline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x + n} x^{\overline n} - n x^{\overline n} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {x + n} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {x + j} - n x^{\overline n} | c = {{Defof|Rising Factorial}} }} ...
Product of Number by its Rising Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Number_by_its_Rising_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Number_by_its_Rising_Factorial
[ "Rising Factorials" ]
[ "Definition:Rising Factorial" ]
[ "Category:Rising Factorials" ]
proofwiki-11782
Value of Formula under Assignment Determined by Free Variables
Let $\mathbf A$ be a WFF of predicate logic. Let $\AA$ be a structure for predicate logic. Let $\sigma, \sigma'$ be assignments for $\mathbf A$ in $\AA$ such that: :For each free variable $x$ of $\mathbf A$, $\map \sigma x = \map {\sigma'} x$ Then: :$\map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} {\mathbf A} \sqbrk \sigma = \map {\oper...
Proceed by the Principle of Structural Induction applied to the bottom-up specification of predicate logic. If $\mathbf A = \map p {\tau_1, \ldots, \tau_n}$, then: :$\map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} {\mathbf A} \sqbrk \sigma = \map {p_\AA} {\map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} {\tau_1} \sqbrk \sigma, \ldots, \map {\operatorname{...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:WFF of Predicate Logic|WFF of predicate logic]]. Let $\AA$ be a [[Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic|structure for predicate logic]]. Let $\sigma, \sigma'$ be [[Definition:Assignment for Formula|assignments for $\mathbf A$ in $\AA$]] such that: :For each [[Definition:Free Vari...
Proceed by the [[Principle of Structural Induction]] applied to the [[Definition:Bottom-Up Specification of Predicate Logic|bottom-up specification of predicate logic]]. If $\mathbf A = \map p {\tau_1, \ldots, \tau_n}$, then: :$\map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} {\mathbf A} \sqbrk \sigma = \map {p_\AA} {\map {\operatorna...
Value of Formula under Assignment Determined by Free Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Formula_under_Assignment_Determined_by_Free_Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Formula_under_Assignment_Determined_by_Free_Variables
[ "Predicate Logic" ]
[ "Definition:Language of Predicate Logic/Formal Grammar", "Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic", "Definition:Assignment for Structure/Formula", "Definition:Free Variable", "Definition:Value of Formula under Assignment" ]
[ "Principle of Structural Induction", "Definition:Language of Predicate Logic/Formal Grammar", "Definition:Quantifier", "Definition:Free Variable", "Definition:Domain (Set Theory)/Mapping", "Definition:Assignment for Structure/Formula", "Definition:Assignment for Structure/Term", "Value of Term under A...
proofwiki-11783
First Inversion Formula for Stirling Numbers
For all $m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k {n \brack k} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$ where: :$\ds {n \brack k}$ denotes an unsigned Stirling number of the first kind :$\ds {k \brace m}$ denotes a Stirling number of the second kind :$\delta_{m n}$ denotes the Kronecker delta.
The proof proceeds by strong induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \forall m \in \Z_{\ge 0}: \sum_k {n \brack k} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$
For all $m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k {n \brack k} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$ where: :$\ds {n \brack k}$ denotes an [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|unsigned Stirling number of the first kind]] :$\ds {k \brace m}$ denotes a [[Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second...
The proof proceeds by [[Second Principle of Mathematical Induction|strong induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \forall m \in \Z_{\ge 0}: \sum_k {n \brack k} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$
First Inversion Formula for Stirling Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Inversion_Formula_for_Stirling_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Inversion_Formula_for_Stirling_Numbers
[ "Stirling Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned", "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind", "Definition:Kronecker Delta" ]
[ "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-11784
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of 1
:$\ds {1 \brack n} = \delta_{1 n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {1 \brack n} | r = 0 \times {0 \brack n} + {0 \brack n - 1} | c = {{Defof|Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = {0 \brack n - 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } | c = {{Defof|Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn ...
:$\ds {1 \brack n} = \delta_{1 n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {1 \brack n} | r = 0 \times {0 \brack n} + {0 \brack n - 1} | c = {{Defof|Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = {0 \brack n - 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } | c = {{Defof|Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn ...
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_1
[ "Examples of Stirling Numbers of the First Kind" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-11785
Signed Stirling Number of the First Kind of 1
:$\map s {1, n} = \delta_{1 n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map s {1, n} | r = \map s {0, n - 1} - 0 \times \map s {0, n} | c = {{Defof|Signed Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = \map s {0, n - 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } | c = {{Defof|Signed Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn |...
:$\map s {1, n} = \delta_{1 n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map s {1, n} | r = \map s {0, n - 1} - 0 \times \map s {0, n} | c = {{Defof|Signed Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = \map s {0, n - 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } | c = {{Defof|Signed Stirling Numbers of the First Kind}} }} {{eqn |...
Signed Stirling Number of the First Kind of 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Signed_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Signed_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_1
[ "Examples of Stirling Numbers of the First Kind" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-11786
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of 1
:$\ds {1 \brace n} = \delta_{1 n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {1 \brace n} | r = n \times {0 \brace n} + {0 \brace n - 1} | c = {{Defof|Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = n \times \delta_{0 n} + \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } | c = {{Defof|Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } ...
:$\ds {1 \brace n} = \delta_{1 n}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = {1 \brace n} | r = n \times {0 \brace n} + {0 \brace n - 1} | c = {{Defof|Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = n \times \delta_{0 n} + \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } | c = {{Defof|Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind}} }} {{eqn | r = \delta_{0 \paren {n - 1} } ...
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_1
[ "Stirling Numbers" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-11787
Second Inversion Formula for Stirling Numbers
For all $m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k {n \brace k} {k \brack m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$ where: :$\ds {n \brace k}$ denotes a Stirling number of the second kind :$\ds {k \brack m}$ denotes an unsigned Stirling number of the first kind :$\delta_{m n}$ denotes the Kronecker delta.
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \forall m \in \Z_{\ge 0}: \sum_k {n \brace k} {k \brack m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$
For all $m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_k {n \brace k} {k \brack m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$ where: :$\ds {n \brace k}$ denotes a [[Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind|Stirling number of the second kind]] :$\ds {k \brack m}$ denotes an [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|un...
The proof proceeds by [[Second Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \forall m \in \Z_{\ge 0}: \sum_k {n \brace k} {k \brack m} \paren {-1}^{n - k} = \delta_{m n}$
Second Inversion Formula for Stirling Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Inversion_Formula_for_Stirling_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Inversion_Formula_for_Stirling_Numbers
[ "Stirling Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind", "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned", "Definition:Kronecker Delta" ]
[ "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-11788
Zero Choose n
:$\dbinom 0 n = \delta_{0 n}$
:$\dbinom m n = \begin{cases}\dfrac {m!} {n! \paren {m - n}!} & : 0 \le n \le m \\&\\0 & : \text { otherwise } \end{cases}$
:$\dbinom 0 n = \delta_{0 n}$
:$\dbinom m n = \begin{cases}\dfrac {m!} {n! \paren {m - n}!} & : 0 \le n \le m \\&\\0 & : \text { otherwise } \end{cases}$
Zero Choose n
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Choose_n
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Choose_n
[ "Examples of Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-11789
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of 0
:$\ds {0 \brack n} = \delta_{0 n}$
By definition of unsigned Stirling number of the first kind: $\ds x^{\underline 0} = \sum_k \paren {-1}^{0 - k} {0 \brack k} x^k$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 0} | r = 1 | c = Number to Power of Zero Falling is One }} {{eqn | r = x^0 | c = {{Defof|Integer Power}} }} {{end-eqn}...
:$\ds {0 \brack n} = \delta_{0 n}$
By definition of [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|unsigned Stirling number of the first kind]]: $\ds x^{\underline 0} = \sum_k \paren {-1}^{0 - k} {0 \brack k} x^k$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 0} | r = 1 | c = [[Number to Power of Zero Falling is One]] }} ...
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of 0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_0
[ "Examples of Stirling Numbers of the First Kind" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned", "Number to Power of Zero Falling is One" ]
proofwiki-11790
Signed Stirling Number of the First Kind of 0
:$\map s {0, n} = \delta_{0 n}$
By definition of signed Stirling number of the first kind: $\ds x^{\underline 0} = \sum_k \map s {0, k} x^k$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 0} | r = 1 | c = Number to Power of Zero Falling is One }} {{eqn | r = x^0 | c = {{Defof|Integer Power}} }} {{end-eqn}} Thus, in the expres...
:$\map s {0, n} = \delta_{0 n}$
By definition of [[Definition:Signed Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|signed Stirling number of the first kind]]: $\ds x^{\underline 0} = \sum_k \map s {0, k} x^k$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{\underline 0} | r = 1 | c = [[Number to Power of Zero Falling is One]] }} {{eqn | r = x^0 |...
Signed Stirling Number of the First Kind of 0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Signed_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Signed_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_0
[ "Examples of Stirling Numbers of the First Kind" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Signed", "Number to Power of Zero Falling is One" ]
proofwiki-11791
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of 0
:$\ds {0 \brace n} = \delta_{0 n}$
By definition of Stirling numbers of the second kind: $\ds x^{\underline 0} = \sum_k {0 \brace k} x^k$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^0 | r = 1 | c = {{Defof|Integer Power}} }} {{eqn | r = x^{\underline 0} | c = Number to Power of Zero Falling is One }} {{end-eqn}} Thus, in the expression: ...
:$\ds {0 \brace n} = \delta_{0 n}$
By definition of [[Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind|Stirling numbers of the second kind]]: $\ds x^{\underline 0} = \sum_k {0 \brace k} x^k$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^0 | r = 1 | c = {{Defof|Integer Power}} }} {{eqn | r = x^{\underline 0} | c = [[Number to Power of Zer...
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of 0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_0
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_0
[ "Examples of Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind", "Number to Power of Zero Falling is One" ]
proofwiki-11792
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Self
:$\ds {n \brack n} = 1$
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds {n \brack n} = 1$
:$\ds {n \brack n} = 1$
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds {n \brack n} = 1$
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Self
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Self
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Self
[ "Stirling Numbers" ]
[]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-11793
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater
Let $\ds {n \brack k}$ denote an unsigned Stirling number of the first kind. Then: :$\ds {n \brack k} = 0$
By definition, unsigned Stirling number of the first kind are defined as the polynomial coefficients $\ds {n \brack k}$ which satisfy the equation: :$\ds x^{\underline n} = \sum_k \paren {-1}^{n - k} {n \brack k} x^k$ where $x^{\underline n}$ denotes the $n$th falling factorial of $x$. Both of the expressions on the {{...
Let $\ds {n \brack k}$ denote an [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|unsigned Stirling number of the first kind]]. Then: :$\ds {n \brack k} = 0$
By definition, [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|unsigned Stirling number of the first kind]] are defined as the [[Definition:Polynomial Coefficient|polynomial coefficients]] $\ds {n \brack k}$ which satisfy the equation: :$\ds x^{\underline n} = \sum_k \paren {-1}^{n - k} {n \brack k} x^k$ wher...
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater/Proof_1
[ "Stirling Numbers", "Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial", "Definition:Falling Factorial", "Definition:Expression", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial" ]
proofwiki-11794
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater
Let $\ds {n \brack k}$ denote an unsigned Stirling number of the first kind. Then: :$\ds {n \brack k} = 0$
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P v$ be the proposition: :$\ds k > n \implies {n \brack k} = 0$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case: :$\ds {0 \brack k} = \delta_{0 k}$ from Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of 0. So by definition of Kronecker delta: :$\fo...
Let $\ds {n \brack k}$ denote an [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|unsigned Stirling number of the first kind]]. Then: :$\ds {n \brack k} = 0$
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P v$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds k > n \implies {n \brack k} = 0$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case: :$\ds {0 \brack k} = \delta_{0 k}$ from [[Unsigned Stirli...
Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater/Proof_2
[ "Stirling Numbers", "Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of 0", "Definition:Kronecker Delta", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number ...
proofwiki-11795
Signed Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater
Let $\map s {n, k}$ denote a signed Stirling number of the first kind. Then: :$\map s {n, k} = 0$
By definition, the signed Stirling numbers of the first kind are defined as the polynomial coefficients $\map s {n, k}$ which satisfy the equation: :$\ds x^{\underline n} = \sum_k \map s {n, k} x^k$ where $x^{\underline n}$ denotes the $n$th falling factorial of $x$. Both of the expressions on the {{LHS}} and {{RHS}} a...
Let $\map s {n, k}$ denote a [[Definition:Signed Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|signed Stirling number of the first kind]]. Then: :$\map s {n, k} = 0$
By definition, the [[Definition:Signed Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|signed Stirling numbers of the first kind]] are defined as the [[Definition:Polynomial Coefficient|polynomial coefficients]] $\map s {n, k}$ which satisfy the equation: :$\ds x^{\underline n} = \sum_k \map s {n, k} x^k$ where $x^{\underline n}$ ...
Signed Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Signed_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Signed_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater
[ "Stirling Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Signed" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Signed", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial", "Definition:Falling Factorial", "Definition:Expression", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial" ]
proofwiki-11796
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Greater
Let $\ds {n \brace k}$ denote a Stirling number of the second kind. Then: :$\ds {n \brace k} = 0$
By definition, the Stirling numbers of the second kind are defined as the coefficients $\ds {n \brace k}$ which satisfy the equation: :$\ds x^n = \sum_k {n \brace k} x^{\underline k}$ where $x^{\underline k}$ denotes the $k$th falling factorial of $x$. Both of the expressions on the {{LHS}} and {{RHS}} are polynomials ...
Let $\ds {n \brace k}$ denote a [[Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind|Stirling number of the second kind]]. Then: :$\ds {n \brace k} = 0$
By definition, the [[Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind|Stirling numbers of the second kind]] are defined as the [[Definition:Coefficient|coefficients]] $\ds {n \brace k}$ which satisfy the equation: :$\ds x^n = \sum_k {n \brace k} x^{\underline k}$ where $x^{\underline k}$ denotes the [[Definition:Falling...
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Greater/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater/Proof_1
[ "Stirling Numbers", "Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Greater" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind", "Definition:Coefficient", "Definition:Falling Factorial", "Definition:Expression", "Definition:Polynomial/Real Numbers", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial" ]
proofwiki-11797
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Greater
Let $\ds {n \brace k}$ denote a Stirling number of the second kind. Then: :$\ds {n \brace k} = 0$
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds k > n \implies {n \brace k} = 0$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case: :$\ds {0 \brace k} = \delta_{0 k}$ from Stirling Number of the Second Kind of 0. So by definition of Kronecker delta: :$\forall k \...
Let $\ds {n \brace k}$ denote a [[Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind|Stirling number of the second kind]]. Then: :$\ds {n \brace k} = 0$
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds k > n \implies {n \brace k} = 0$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case: :$\ds {0 \brace k} = \delta_{0 k}$ from [[Stirling Number...
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Greater/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_Number_with_Greater/Proof_2
[ "Stirling Numbers", "Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Greater" ]
[ "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Stirling Number of the Second Kind of 0", "Definition:Kronecker Delta", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Greater/Pro...
proofwiki-11798
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Self
:$\ds {n \brace n} = 1$
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds {n \brace n} = 1$
:$\ds {n \brace n} = 1$
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds {n \brace n} = 1$
Stirling Number of the Second Kind of Number with Self
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_Number_with_Self
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_Number_with_Self
[ "Stirling Numbers" ]
[]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-11799
Value of Term under Assignment Determined by Variables
Let $\tau$ be a term of predicate logic. Let $\AA$ be a structure for predicate logic. Let $\sigma, \sigma'$ be assignments for $\tau$ in $\AA$ such that: :For each variable $x$ occurring in $\tau$, $\map \sigma x = \map {\sigma'} x$ Then: :$\map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} \tau \sqbrk \sigma = \map {\operatorname{val}_\A...
Proceed by the Principle of Structural Induction applied to the definition of a term. If $\tau = x$, then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} \tau \sqbrk \sigma | r = \map \sigma x | c = {{Defof|Value of Term under Assignment|value under $\sigma$}} }} {{eqn | r = \map {\sigma'} x ...
Let $\tau$ be a [[Definition:Term (Predicate Logic)|term of predicate logic]]. Let $\AA$ be a [[Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic|structure for predicate logic]]. Let $\sigma, \sigma'$ be [[Definition:Assignment for Formula|assignments for $\tau$ in $\AA$]] such that: :For each [[Definition:Variable (Logic)|v...
Proceed by the [[Principle of Structural Induction]] applied to the definition of a [[Definition:Term (Predicate Logic)|term]]. If $\tau = x$, then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\operatorname{val}_\AA} \tau \sqbrk \sigma | r = \map \sigma x | c = {{Defof|Value of Term under Assignment|value under $\si...
Value of Term under Assignment Determined by Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Term_under_Assignment_Determined_by_Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Term_under_Assignment_Determined_by_Variables
[ "Predicate Logic" ]
[ "Definition:Language of Predicate Logic/Formal Grammar/Term", "Definition:Structure for Predicate Logic", "Definition:Assignment for Structure/Formula", "Definition:Variable/Predicate Logic", "Definition:Occurrence (Predicate Logic)", "Definition:Value of Term under Assignment" ]
[ "Principle of Structural Induction", "Definition:Language of Predicate Logic/Formal Grammar/Term", "Principle of Structural Induction", "Category:Predicate Logic" ]