id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-23600
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 5
:There exists $\tau \in \R_{>0}$ such that $0 < t < \tau \implies \map \sigma {\map {\mathbf A} t}$ is simple
Let $\lambda_i = \lambda_j$ be a non-simple eigenvalue of $\mathbf A$. Let $\varepsilon_i$ be the $i^{th}$ diagonal element of $\mathbf E$. Then, by a previous proof, the corresponding eigenvalues of $\map {\mathbf A} t$ are :$\lambda_i + t \varepsilon_i$ :$\lambda_j + t \varepsilon_j$ The difference between these when...
:There exists $\tau \in \R_{>0}$ such that $0 < t < \tau \implies \map \sigma {\map {\mathbf A} t}$ is [[Definition:Simple Eigenvalue|simple]]
Let $\lambda_i = \lambda_j$ be a non-[[Definition:Simple Eigenvalue|simple eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf A$. Let $\varepsilon_i$ be the $i^{th}$ [[Definition:Diagonal Element|diagonal element]] of $\mathbf E$. Then, by [[Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 4|a previous proof]], the correspondi...
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_5
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Simple Eigenvalue" ]
[ "Definition:Simple Eigenvalue", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements", "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 4", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix", "Definition:Simple Eigenvalue", "Definition:Simple Eigenvalue", "Definition:Absolute Difference", "Definition:Eigenv...
proofwiki-23601
Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable/Lemma
Let $\set {v_i}$ be a subset of eigenvectors of $A$ each associated with a distinct eigenvalue. Then: :$\ds \sum_i v_i \in W \implies \forall i : v_i \in W$
Proof by induction. Let $\map P n$ be the statement that: :If $\size {\set {v_i}} = n$, then $\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n v_i \in W \implies \forall i \in \closedint 1 n : v_i \in W$
Let $\set {v_i}$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of [[Definition:Eigenvector of Linear Operator|eigenvectors]] of $A$ each associated with a distinct [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Linear Operator|eigenvalue]]. Then: :$\ds \sum_i v_i \in W \implies \forall i : v_i \in W$
Proof by [[Definition:Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. Let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Statement|statement]] that: :If $\size {\set {v_i}} = n$, then $\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n v_i \in W \implies \forall i \in \closedint 1 n : v_i \in W$
Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonalizable_Linear_Operator_Restricted_to_Invariant_Subspace_is_Diagonalizable/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonalizable_Linear_Operator_Restricted_to_Invariant_Subspace_is_Diagonalizable/Lemma
[ "Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Statement" ]
proofwiki-23602
Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable
Let $V$ be a vector space. Let $A : V \to V$ be a diagonalizable linear operator. Let $W \subseteq V$ be an invariant subspace of $\mathbf A$. Let $A {\restriction_W}$ be the restriction of $A$ to $W$. Then, $A {\restriction_W}$ is diagonalizable in $W$.
=== Lemma === {{:Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Since $A$ is diagonalizable it has an eigenbasis. Therefore, every vector in $W$ can be written as a linear combination of a subset of the eigenvectors of $A$. By the {{Lemma|Diagonalizable Linear Ope...
Let $V$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]]. Let $A : V \to V$ be a [[Definition:Diagonalizable Linear Operator|diagonalizable linear operator]]. Let $W \subseteq V$ be an [[Definition:Invariant Subspace|invariant subspace]] of $\mathbf A$. Let $A {\restriction_W}$ be the [[Definition:Restriction of Mappin...
=== [[Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable/Lemma|Lemma]] === {{:Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Since $A$ is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Linear Operator|diagonalizable]] it has an [[Definition:Eigenbasi...
Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonalizable_Linear_Operator_Restricted_to_Invariant_Subspace_is_Diagonalizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonalizable_Linear_Operator_Restricted_to_Invariant_Subspace_is_Diagonalizable
[ "Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable", "Diagonalizable Linear Operators", "Restrictions" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Diagonalizable Linear Operator", "Definition:Invariant Subspace", "Definition:Restriction/Mapping", "Definition:Diagonalizable Linear Operator" ]
[ "Diagonalizable Linear Operator Restricted to Invariant Subspace is Diagonalizable/Lemma", "Definition:Diagonalizable Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenbasis/Vector Space", "Definition:Vector", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition...
proofwiki-23603
Diagonalizable Matrices Commute iff Simultaneously Diagonalizable
Let $\mathbb F$ be a field. Let $M$ be a set of diagonalizable matrices over $\mathbb F$. Then, $M$ is a commuting set {{Iff}} $M$ is simultaneously diagonalizable.
=== Necessary Case === We have that $M$ is simultaneously diagonalizable. Thus, there is a nonsingular matrix $\mathbf X$ that diagonalizes all elements of $M$. Let $\mathbf A, \mathbf B \in M$ be arbitrary. Let $\mathbf D_{\mathbf A} = \mathbf X^{-1} \mathbf A \mathbf X$ Let $\mathbf D_{\mathbf B} = \mathbf X^{-1} \ma...
Let $\mathbb F$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable matrices]] over $\mathbb F$. Then, $M$ is a [[Definition:Commuting Set of Elements|commuting set]] {{Iff}} $M$ is [[Definition:Simultaneously Diagonalizable Mat...
=== Necessary Case === We have that $M$ is [[Definition:Simultaneously Diagonalizable Matrices|simultaneously diagonalizable]]. Thus, there is a [[Definition:Nonsingular Matrix|nonsingular matrix]] $\mathbf X$ that [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizes]] all [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $M$. Let $\m...
Diagonalizable Matrices Commute iff Simultaneously Diagonalizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonalizable_Matrices_Commute_iff_Simultaneously_Diagonalizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonalizable_Matrices_Commute_iff_Simultaneously_Diagonalizable
[ "Diagonalizable Matrices", "Commutativity" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Commutative/Set", "Definition:Simultaneously Diagonalizable Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Simultaneously Diagonalizable Matrices", "Definition:Nonsingular Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Matrix Multiplication is Associative", "Matrix Multiplication on Diagonal Matrices is Commutative", "...
proofwiki-23604
Rule of Association/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Reverse Implication
:$\vdash \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } \impliedby \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r} \implies \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } }} {{Assumption |1|\paren {p \land q} \land r}} {{Simplification|2|1|p \land q|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|r|1|2}} {{Simplification|4|1|p|2|1}} {{Simplification|5|1|q|2|2}} {{Conjunction|6|1|q \land r|5|3}} {{Conjunc...
:$\vdash \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } \impliedby \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r} \implies \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } }} {{Assumption |1|\paren {p \land q} \land r}} {{Simplification|2|1|p \land q|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|r|1|2}} {{Simplification|4|1|p|2|1}} {{Simplification|5|1|q|2|2}} {{Conjunction|6|1|q \land r|5|3}} {{Conjunc...
Rule of Association/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Reverse Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Association/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Reverse_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Association/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Reverse_Implication
[ "Rule of Association" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-23605
Rule of Association/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Forward Implication
:$\vdash \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } \implies \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } \implies \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r} }} {{Assumption |1|p \land \paren {q \land r} }} {{Simplification|2|1|p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|q \land r|1|2}} {{Simplification|4|1|q|3|1}} {{Simplification|5|1|r|3|2}} {{Conjunction|6|1|p \land q|2|4}} {{Conjun...
:$\vdash \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } \implies \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {p \land \paren {q \land r} } \implies \paren {\paren {p \land q} \land r} }} {{Assumption |1|p \land \paren {q \land r} }} {{Simplification|2|1|p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|q \land r|1|2}} {{Simplification|4|1|q|3|1}} {{Simplification|5|1|r|3|2}} {{Conjunction|6|1|p \land q|2|4}} {{Conjun...
Rule of Association/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Forward Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Association/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Forward_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Association/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Forward_Implication
[ "Rule of Association" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-23606
Rule of Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Forward Implication
:$\vdash \paren {p \land q} \implies \paren {q \land p}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {p \land q} \implies \paren {q \land p} }} {{Assumption |1|\paren {p \land q} }} {{Simplification|2|1|p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|q|1|2}} {{Conjunction|4|1|\paren {q \land p}|3|2}} {{Implication|5||\paren {p \land q} \implies \paren {q \land p}|1|4}} {{EndTableau|lemma}}
:$\vdash \paren {p \land q} \implies \paren {q \land p}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {p \land q} \implies \paren {q \land p} }} {{Assumption |1|\paren {p \land q} }} {{Simplification|2|1|p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|q|1|2}} {{Conjunction|4|1|\paren {q \land p}|3|2}} {{Implication|5||\paren {p \land q} \implies \paren {q \land p}|1|4}} {{EndTableau|lemma}}
Rule of Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Forward Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Forward_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Forward_Implication
[ "Rule of Association" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-23607
Rule of Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Reverse Implication
:$\vdash \paren {q \land p} \implies \paren {p \land q}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {q \land p} \implies \paren {p \land q} }} {{Assumption |1|\paren {q \land p} }} {{Simplification|2|1|q|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|p|1|2}} {{Conjunction|4|1|\paren {p \land q}|3|2}} {{Implication|5||\paren {q \land p} \implies \paren {p \land q}|1|4}} {{EndTableau|lemma}}
:$\vdash \paren {q \land p} \implies \paren {p \land q}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {q \land p} \implies \paren {p \land q} }} {{Assumption |1|\paren {q \land p} }} {{Simplification|2|1|q|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|p|1|2}} {{Conjunction|4|1|\paren {p \land q}|3|2}} {{Implication|5||\paren {q \land p} \implies \paren {p \land q}|1|4}} {{EndTableau|lemma}}
Rule of Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation 2/Proof 1/Reverse Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Reverse_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Commutation/Conjunction/Formulation_2/Proof_1/Reverse_Implication
[ "Rule of Association" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-23608
Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix is Monic
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity. Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix over $R$ of order $n > 0$. Let $\mathbf I_n$ be the $n \times n$ identity matrix. Let $R \sqbrk x$ be the polynomial ring in one variable over $R$. Let $\map {p_{\mathbf A} } x$ be the characteristic polynomial of $\mathbf A$. Then $\map {p_{\...
From Existence of Schur Decomposition for Square Matrix, matrix $\mathbf A$ is similar to an upper triangular matrix $\mathbf T$. Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {p_{\mathbf A} } x | r = \map \det {x \mathbf I_n - \mathbf A} | c = {{Defof|Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \map \det ...
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring with Unity|commutative ring with unity]]. Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] over $R$ of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order]] $n > 0$. Let $\mathbf I_n$ be the $n \times n$ [[Definition:Identity Matrix|identity matrix]]. Let $R \sqbrk x$ ...
From [[Existence of Schur Decomposition for Square Matrix]], [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Matrix Similarity|similar]] to an [[Definition:Upper Triangular Matrix|upper triangular matrix]] $\mathbf T$. Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {p_{\mathbf A} } x | r = \map \det {x \mathbf I...
Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix is Monic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristic_Polynomial_of_Matrix_is_Monic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristic_Polynomial_of_Matrix_is_Monic
[ "Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Unit Matrix", "Definition:Polynomial Ring", "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Definition:Monic Polynomial" ]
[ "Existence of Schur Decomposition for Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Matrix Similarity", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Upper Triangular Matrix", "Similar Matrices have Same Characteristic Polynomial", "Determinant of Upper Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements...
proofwiki-23609
Characteristic Polynomial of Triangular Matrix
Let $\mathbf T$ be a square triangular matrix of order $n$. Then, the characteristic polynomial $\map {p_T} x$ is given by: :$\ds \map {p_T} x = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x - t_{ii} }$ where $t_{ii}$ are the diagonal elements of $\mathbf T$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {p_T} x | r = \map \det {x \mathbf I - \mathbf T} | c = {{Defof|Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x - t_{ii} } | c = Determinant of Triangular Matrix }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Triangular Matrices Category:...
Let $\mathbf T$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square]] [[Definition:Triangular Matrix|triangular matrix]] of order $n$. Then, the [[Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix|characteristic polynomial]] $\map {p_T} x$ is given by: :$\ds \map {p_T} x = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x - t_{ii} }$ where $t_{ii}$...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {p_T} x | r = \map \det {x \mathbf I - \mathbf T} | c = {{Defof|Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x - t_{ii} } | c = [[Determinant of Triangular Matrix]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Triangular Matrices]]...
Characteristic Polynomial of Triangular Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristic_Polynomial_of_Triangular_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristic_Polynomial_of_Triangular_Matrix
[ "Triangular Matrices", "Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements" ]
[ "Determinant of Triangular Matrix", "Category:Triangular Matrices", "Category:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix" ]
proofwiki-23610
Eigenvalues of Triangular Matrix
The eigenvalues of a square triangular matrix are its diagonal elements.
Let $\mathbf T$ be a square triangular matrix. From Characteristic Polynomial of Triangular Matrix, we have: :$\ds \map {p_T} x = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x - t_{ii} }$ where $t_{ii}$ are the diagonal elements of $\mathbf T$. The eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial of $\mathbf T$. Thus, th...
The [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Square Matrix|eigenvalues]] of a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square]] [[Definition:Triangular Matrix|triangular matrix]] are its [[Definition:Diagonal Element|diagonal elements]].
Let $\mathbf T$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square]] [[Definition:Triangular Matrix|triangular matrix]]. From [[Characteristic Polynomial of Triangular Matrix]], we have: :$\ds \map {p_T} x = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x - t_{ii} }$ where $t_{ii}$ are the [[Definition:Diagonal Element|diagonal elements]] of $...
Eigenvalues of Triangular Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Triangular_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Triangular_Matrix
[ "Triangular Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix", "Characteristic Polynomial of Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix", "Definition:Root of Polynomial", "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Definition:Eigen...
proofwiki-23611
Trace of Matrix is Sum of Eigenvalues
Let $\mathbf A$ be a matrix of order $n$ over $\mathbb C$. Let $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n$ be the eigenvalues of $\mathbf A$ including algebraic multiplicity. Then: :$\ds \map \tr {\mathbf A} = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \lambda_i$ where $\map \tr {\mathbf A}$ is the trace of $\mathbf A$.
From Existence of Schur Decomposition for Square Matrix, $\mathbf A$ is similar to an upper triangular matrix $\mathbf T$. Let $\omega_1, \omega_2, \ldots, \omega_n$ be the eigenvalues of $\mathbf T$. Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tr {\mathbf A} | r = \map \tr {\mathbf T} | c = Similar Matrices...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order]] $n$ over $\mathbb C$. Let $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n$ be the [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Square Matrix|eigenvalues]] of $\mathbf A$ including [[Definition:Algebraic Multiplicity|algebraic multiplicity]]. The...
From [[Existence of Schur Decomposition for Square Matrix]], $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Matrix Similarity|similar]] to an [[Definition:Upper Triangular Matrix|upper triangular matrix]] $\mathbf T$. Let $\omega_1, \omega_2, \ldots, \omega_n$ be the [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Square Matrix|eigenvalues]] of $\mathbf T$....
Trace of Matrix is Sum of Eigenvalues
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Trace_of_Matrix_is_Sum_of_Eigenvalues
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Trace_of_Matrix_is_Sum_of_Eigenvalues
[ "Traces of Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix", "Definition:Algebraic Multiplicity", "Definition:Trace (Linear Algebra)/Matrix" ]
[ "Existence of Schur Decomposition for Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix Similarity", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Upper Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix", "Similar Matrices have same Traces", "Eigenvalues of Triangular Matrix", "Similar Matrices have Same Eigenvalues" ]
proofwiki-23612
Hermitian Conjugate of Normal Matrix is Normal
The Hermitian conjugate of a normal matrix is normal.
Let $\mathbf N$ be a normal matrix. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf N \mathbf N^\dagger | r = \mathbf N^\dagger \mathbf N | c = {{Defof|Normal Matrix}} }} {{eqn | l = \paren {\mathbf N^\dagger}^\dagger \paren {\mathbf N^\dagger} | r = \paren {\mathbf N^\dagger} \paren {\mathbf N^\dagger}^\d...
The [[Definition:Hermitian Conjugate|Hermitian conjugate]] of a [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal matrix]] is [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]].
Let $\mathbf N$ be a [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal matrix]]. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf N \mathbf N^\dagger | r = \mathbf N^\dagger \mathbf N | c = {{Defof|Normal Matrix}} }} {{eqn | l = \paren {\mathbf N^\dagger}^\dagger \paren {\mathbf N^\dagger} | r = \paren {\mathbf N^\dagger}...
Hermitian Conjugate of Normal Matrix is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_of_Normal_Matrix_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_of_Normal_Matrix_is_Normal
[ "Normal Matrices", "Hermitian Conjugates" ]
[ "Definition:Hermitian Conjugate", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Hermitian Conjugate is Involution", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Category:Normal Matrices", "Category:Hermitian Conjugates" ]
proofwiki-23613
Lower Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal
A square matrix that is both lower triangular and normal is diagonal.
Let $\mathbf L$ be a square matrix that is both lower triangular and normal. From Transpose of Upper Triangular Matrix is Lower Triangular, $\mathbf L^\intercal$ is upper triangular. Since $\bar 0 = 0$, $\overline {\mathbf L^\intercal} = \mathbf L^\dagger$ is upper triangular. From Hermitian Conjugate of Normal Matrix ...
A [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] that is both [[Definition:Lower Triangular Matrix|lower triangular]] and [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]] is [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal]].
Let $\mathbf L$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] that is both [[Definition:Lower Triangular Matrix|lower triangular]] and [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]]. From [[Transpose of Upper Triangular Matrix is Lower Triangular]], $\mathbf L^\intercal$ is [[Definition:Upper Triangular Matrix|upper triangular...
Lower Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lower_Triangular_Normal_Matrix_is_Diagonal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lower_Triangular_Normal_Matrix_is_Diagonal
[ "Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal", "Normal Matrices", "Lower Triangular Matrices", "Diagonal Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Lower Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Lower Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Transpose of Upper Triangular Matrix is Lower Triangular", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Upper Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Upper Triangular Matrix", "Hermitian Co...
proofwiki-23614
Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal
A square matrix that is both triangular and normal is diagonal.
=== Upper Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal === {{:Upper Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal}}{{qed|lemma}}
A [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] that is both [[Definition:Triangular Matrix|triangular]] and [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]] is [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal]].
=== [[Upper Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal]] === {{:Upper Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal}}{{qed|lemma}}
Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangular_Normal_Matrix_is_Diagonal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triangular_Normal_Matrix_is_Diagonal
[ "Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal", "Triangular Matrices", "Normal Matrices", "Diagonal Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix" ]
[ "Upper Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal" ]
proofwiki-23615
(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p/Theorem Form
:$\paren {\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p} } \implies p$
{{BeginTableau|\paren {\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p} } \implies p}} {{Assumption|1|\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p} }} {{TheoremIntro|2|\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies r} } \implies \paren {p \implies r}|Hypothetical Syl...
:$\paren {\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p} } \implies p$
{{BeginTableau|\paren {\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p} } \implies p}} {{Assumption|1|\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p} }} {{TheoremIntro|2|\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies r} } \implies \paren {p \implies r}|[[Hypothetical S...
(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p/Theorem Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/(p_implies_q)_implies_q,_q_implies_p_therefore_p/Theorem_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/(p_implies_q)_implies_q,_q_implies_p_therefore_p/Theorem_Form
[ "(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p" ]
[]
[ "Hypothetical Syllogism/Formulation 3", "Peirce's Law/Formulation 2" ]
proofwiki-23616
Finite Infimum in Subframe Equals Infimum in Frame
Let $L = \struct{S, \preceq}$ be a frame. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct{T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a subframe of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the restriction of $\preceq$ to $T$. Let $F \subseteq T$ be finite. The infimum ${\bigwedge}_M F$ of $F$ exists in $M$ and equals the infimum $\bigvee F$ in ...
{{Recall|Subframe|subframe}} {{:Definition:Subframe}} From Infimum in Ordered Subset: :$\forall $ finite $F \subseteq T$, the infimum ${\bigwedge}_M F$ of $F$ exists in $M$ and ${\bigvee}_M F {{=}} \bigvee F$ {{qed}} Category:Subframes Category:Frames fm06rx5ji40p569es64ppu97uj9312n
Let $L = \struct{S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame]]. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct{T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a [[Definition:Subframe|subframe]] of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the [[Definition:Restriction of Ordering|restriction]] of $\preceq$ to $T$. Let $F \subset...
{{Recall|Subframe|subframe}} {{:Definition:Subframe}} From [[Infimum in Ordered Subset]]: :$\forall $ [[Definition:Finite Subset|finite]] $F \subseteq T$, the [[Definition:Infimum of Set|infimum]] ${\bigwedge}_M F$ of $F$ exists in $M$ and ${\bigvee}_M F {{=}} \bigvee F$ {{qed}} [[Category:Subframes]] [[Category:Fram...
Finite Infimum in Subframe Equals Infimum in Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Infimum_in_Subframe_Equals_Infimum_in_Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Infimum_in_Subframe_Equals_Infimum_in_Frame
[ "Subframes", "Frames" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Subframe", "Definition:Restriction of Ordering", "Definition:Finite Subset", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Infimum of Set" ]
[ "Infimum in Ordered Subset", "Definition:Finite Subset", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Category:Subframes", "Category:Frames" ]
proofwiki-23617
Increasing Sum of Squares of Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{r \mathop = 1}^n r \binom n r^2 = \dfrac {\paren {2 n - 1}!} {\paren {\paren {n - 1}!}^2}$ where $\dbinom n r$ denotes the binomial coefficient: :$\dbinom n r = \dfrac {n!} {r! \paren {n - r} }$
We note that $\ds \sum_{r = 1}^n r \binom n r^2$ is the same as $\ds \sum_{r = 0}^n r \binom n r^2$ because the zeroth term is $0 \dbinom n 0^2 = 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \sum_{r \mathop = 0}^n r \binom n r^2 | r = 0 \binom n 0^2 + 1 \binom n 1^2 + 2 \binom n 2^2 + 3 \binom n 3^2 + \cdots...
:$\ds \sum_{r \mathop = 1}^n r \binom n r^2 = \dfrac {\paren {2 n - 1}!} {\paren {\paren {n - 1}!}^2}$ where $\dbinom n r$ denotes the [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]]: :$\dbinom n r = \dfrac {n!} {r! \paren {n - r} }$
We note that $\ds \sum_{r = 1}^n r \binom n r^2$ is the same as $\ds \sum_{r = 0}^n r \binom n r^2$ because the zeroth term is $0 \dbinom n 0^2 = 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \sum_{r \mathop = 0}^n r \binom n r^2 | r = 0 \binom n 0^2 + 1 \binom n 1^2 + 2 \binom n 2^2 + 3 \binom n 3^2 + \cdo...
Increasing Sum of Squares of Binomial Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Squares_of_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Squares_of_Binomial_Coefficients
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients", "Sum of Squares of Binomial Coefficients", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-23618
Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be frames. Let $\phi: S_1 \to S_2$ be a frame homomorphism. Let $L_3 = \struct{S_3, \preceq_3}$ be the ordered set where: :$S_3$ denotes the image of $S_1$ under $\phi$ :$\preceq_3$ denotes the restricted ordering of $\preceq_2$ to the subset $S_...
=== {{Lemma|Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame|1|Lemma 1}} === {{:Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}}
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frames]]. Let $\phi: S_1 \to S_2$ be a [[Definition:Frame Homomorphism|frame homomorphism]]. Let $L_3 = \struct{S_3, \preceq_3}$ be the [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]] where: :$S_3$ denotes the [[D...
=== {{Lemma|Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame|1|Lemma 1}} === {{:Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}}
Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Frame_under_Frame_Homomorphism_is_Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Frame_under_Frame_Homomorphism_is_Frame
[ "Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame", "Frame Homomorphisms", "Frames" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Frame Homomorphism", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Restriction of Ordering", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Subframe" ]
[]
proofwiki-23619
Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame/Lemma 1
Let $T \subseteq S_3$. Let $\bigvee T$ denote the supremum of $T$ in $L_2$. Then: :$\bigvee T \in S_3$.
{{Recall|Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame}} {{:Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)}} {{Recall|Complete Lattice|complete Lattice}} {{:Definition:Complete Lattice/Definition 1}} By definition of image: :$S_3 = \phi \sqbrk {S_1}$ From {{Corollary|Image of Preimage under Mapping}}: :$(1) \quad T = \phi \sqbrk {\phi^{-1} \sqbrk T...
Let $T \subseteq S_3$. Let $\bigvee T$ denote the [[Definition:Supremum of Set|supremum]] of $T$ in $L_2$. Then: :$\bigvee T \in S_3$.
{{Recall|Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame}} {{:Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)}} {{Recall|Complete Lattice|complete Lattice}} {{:Definition:Complete Lattice/Definition 1}} By definition of [[Definition:Image of Subset under Mapping|image]]: :$S_3 = \phi \sqbrk {S_1}$ From {{Corollary|Image of Preimage under Mapping}}:...
Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Frame_under_Frame_Homomorphism_is_Frame/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Frame_under_Frame_Homomorphism_is_Frame/Lemma_1
[ "Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame" ]
[ "Definition:Supremum of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Category:Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame" ]
proofwiki-23620
Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame/Lemma 2
Let $F \subseteq S_3$ be a finite subset. Let $\bigwedge F$ denote the infimum of $F$ in $L_2$. Then: :$\bigwedge F \in S_3$.
{{Recall|Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame}} {{:Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)}} {{Recall|Complete Lattice|complete Lattice}} {{:Definition:Complete Lattice/Definition 1}} By definition of image: :$\forall y \in F : \exists x \in S_1 : \map \phi x = y$ For each $y \in F$ choose $x_y \in S_1 : \map \phi {x_y} = y$. Let $G...
Let $F \subseteq S_3$ be a [[Definition:Finite Subset|finite subset]]. Let $\bigwedge F$ denote the [[Definition:Infimum of Set|infimum]] of $F$ in $L_2$. Then: :$\bigwedge F \in S_3$.
{{Recall|Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame}} {{:Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)}} {{Recall|Complete Lattice|complete Lattice}} {{:Definition:Complete Lattice/Definition 1}} By definition of [[Definition:Image of Subset under Mapping|image]]: :$\forall y \in F : \exists x \in S_1 : \map \phi x = y$ For each $y \in F$ c...
Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Frame_under_Frame_Homomorphism_is_Frame/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Frame_under_Frame_Homomorphism_is_Frame/Lemma_2
[ "Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Subset", "Definition:Infimum of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Category:Image of Frame under Frame Homomorphism is Frame" ]
proofwiki-23621
Normal Matrix has Orthogonal Eigenspaces
Let $\mathbf N$ be a normal matrix. Let $\lambda_1, \lambda_2$ be distinct eigenvalues of $\mathbf N$. Then, the eigenspaces of $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ are orthogonal: :$\map \ker {\mathbf N - \lambda_1 \mathbf I} \perp \map \ker {\mathbf N - \lambda_2 \mathbf I}$ where: :$\ker$ denotes kernel :$\mathbf I$ denotes ...
Follows immediately from Normal Matrix is Normal Operator and Eigenvalues of Normal Operator have Orthogonal Eigenspaces {{qed}} Category:Normal Matrices Category:Eigenspaces fte1v1yw5dz4nzxkd9c2l4vks7vbz81
Let $\mathbf N$ be a [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal matrix]]. Let $\lambda_1, \lambda_2$ be distinct [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Linear Operator|eigenvalues]] of $\mathbf N$. Then, the [[Definition:Eigenspace of Linear Operator|eigenspaces]] of $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ are [[Definition:Orthogonal Sets|orthogona...
Follows immediately from [[Normal Matrix is Normal Operator]] and [[Eigenvalues of Normal Operator have Orthogonal Eigenspaces]] {{qed}} [[Category:Normal Matrices]] [[Category:Eigenspaces]] fte1v1yw5dz4nzxkd9c2l4vks7vbz81
Normal Matrix has Orthogonal Eigenspaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Matrix_has_Orthogonal_Eigenspaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Matrix_has_Orthogonal_Eigenspaces
[ "Normal Matrices", "Eigenspaces" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenspace/Linear Operator", "Definition:Orthogonal (Linear Algebra)/Sets", "Definition:Kernel of Linear Transformation", "Definition:Unit Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal (Linear Algebra)/Sets" ]
[ "Normal Matrix is Normal Operator", "Eigenvalues of Normal Operator have Orthogonal Eigenspaces", "Category:Normal Matrices", "Category:Eigenspaces" ]
proofwiki-23622
Inclusion Mapping of Subframe into Frame is Frame Homomorphism
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a frame. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct {T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a subframe of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the restriction of $\preceq$ to $T$. The inclusion mapping $i: M \to L$ is a frame homomorphism.
{{Recall|theorem = Supremum in Subframe Equals Supremum in Frame}} {{:Supremum in Subframe Equals Supremum in Frame}} {{Recall|theorem = Finite Infimum in Subframe Equals Infimum in Frame}} {{:Finite Infimum in Subframe Equals Infimum in Frame}} We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall A \subseteq T | l = \map ...
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame]]. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct {T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a [[Definition:Subframe|subframe]] of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the [[Definition:Restriction of Ordering|restriction]] of $\preceq$ to $T$. The [[Defini...
{{Recall|theorem = Supremum in Subframe Equals Supremum in Frame}} {{:Supremum in Subframe Equals Supremum in Frame}} {{Recall|theorem = Finite Infimum in Subframe Equals Infimum in Frame}} {{:Finite Infimum in Subframe Equals Infimum in Frame}} We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall A \subseteq T | l = \m...
Inclusion Mapping of Subframe into Frame is Frame Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inclusion_Mapping_of_Subframe_into_Frame_is_Frame_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inclusion_Mapping_of_Subframe_into_Frame_is_Frame_Homomorphism
[ "Subframes", "Frame Homomorphisms", "Inclusion Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Subframe", "Definition:Restriction of Ordering", "Definition:Inclusion Mapping", "Definition:Frame Homomorphism" ]
[ "Category:Subframes", "Category:Frame Homomorphisms", "Category:Inclusion Mappings" ]
proofwiki-23623
Supremum in Subframe Equals Supremum in Frame
Let $L = \struct{S, \preceq}$ be a frame. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct{T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a subframe of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the restriction of $\preceq$ to $T$. Let $A \subseteq T$. The supremum ${\bigvee}_M A$ of $A$ exists in $M$ and equals the supremum $\bigvee A$ in $L$.
{{Recall|Subframe|subframe}} {{:Definition:Subframe}} From Supremum in Ordered Subset: :$\forall A \subseteq T$, the supremum ${\bigvee}_M A$ of $A$ exists in $M$ and ${\bigvee}_M A {{=}} \bigvee A$ {{qed}} Category:Subframes Category:Frames p3ghvw0nb6ahqffgw770zo3k2htzyyh
Let $L = \struct{S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame]]. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct{T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a [[Definition:Subframe|subframe]] of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the [[Definition:Restriction of Ordering|restriction]] of $\preceq$ to $T$. Let $A \subset...
{{Recall|Subframe|subframe}} {{:Definition:Subframe}} From [[Supremum in Ordered Subset]]: :$\forall A \subseteq T$, the [[Definition:Supremum of Set|supremum]] ${\bigvee}_M A$ of $A$ exists in $M$ and ${\bigvee}_M A {{=}} \bigvee A$ {{qed}} [[Category:Subframes]] [[Category:Frames]] p3ghvw0nb6ahqffgw770zo3k2htzyyh
Supremum in Subframe Equals Supremum in Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Supremum_in_Subframe_Equals_Supremum_in_Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Supremum_in_Subframe_Equals_Supremum_in_Frame
[ "Subframes", "Frames" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Subframe", "Definition:Restriction of Ordering", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Definition:Supremum of Set" ]
[ "Supremum in Ordered Subset", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Category:Subframes", "Category:Frames" ]
proofwiki-23624
Subframe is a Frame
Let $L = \struct{S, \preceq}$ be a frame. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct{T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a subframe of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the restriction of $\preceq$ to $T$. Then $M$ is a frame.
{{Recall|Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame}} {{:Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)}}
Let $L = \struct{S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame]]. Let $T \subseteq S$. Let $M = \struct{T, \preceq \restriction_T}$ be a [[Definition:Subframe|subframe]] of $L$ where $\preceq \restriction_T$ is the [[Definition:Restriction of Ordering|restriction]] of $\preceq$ to $T$. Then $M$ is a ...
{{Recall|Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame}} {{:Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)}}
Subframe is a Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subframe_is_a_Frame
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subframe_is_a_Frame
[ "Subframes", "Frames" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Subframe", "Definition:Restriction of Ordering", "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)" ]
[]
proofwiki-23625
Greatest Term of Binomial Expansion/Examples/Arbitrary Example 2
Consider the expression: :$E = \paren {1 - 3 x}^{-\frac 7 3}$ Let $x = \dfrac 1 4$. Then the greatest terms in the power series expansion of $E$ by means of the General Binomial Theorem are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \dfrac {7 \times 10 \times 13} {4^3 \times 3!} }} {{eqn | r = \size {-\dfrac {7 \times 10 ...
Let us perform the expansion: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 - 3 x}^{-\frac 7 3} | r = 1 + \paren {-\dfrac 4 3 - 1} \paren {-3 x} + \dfrac {\paren {-\frac 4 3 - 1} \paren {-\frac 4 3 - 2} } {2!} \paren {-3 x}^2 + \dfrac {\paren {-\frac 4 3 - 1} \paren {-\frac 4 3 - 2} \paren {-\frac 4 3 - 3} } {3!} \paren {-...
Consider the [[Definition:Expression|expression]]: :$E = \paren {1 - 3 x}^{-\frac 7 3}$ Let $x = \dfrac 1 4$. Then the greatest terms in the [[Definition:Power Series Expansion|power series expansion]] of $E$ by means of the [[General Binomial Theorem]] are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \dfrac {7 \times ...
Let us perform the expansion: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 - 3 x}^{-\frac 7 3} | r = 1 + \paren {-\dfrac 4 3 - 1} \paren {-3 x} + \dfrac {\paren {-\frac 4 3 - 1} \paren {-\frac 4 3 - 2} } {2!} \paren {-3 x}^2 + \dfrac {\paren {-\frac 4 3 - 1} \paren {-\frac 4 3 - 2} \paren {-\frac 4 3 - 3} } {3!} \paren {...
Greatest Term of Binomial Expansion/Examples/Arbitrary Example 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Greatest_Term_of_Binomial_Expansion/Examples/Arbitrary_Example_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Greatest_Term_of_Binomial_Expansion/Examples/Arbitrary_Example_2
[ "Binomial Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Expression", "Definition:Power Series Expansion", "Binomial Theorem/General Binomial Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Sign of Number", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial", "Definition:Absolute Value" ]
proofwiki-23626
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 1
:$\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t = \mathbf A$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \map {\mathbf A} 0 }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A + 0 \mathbf U \mathbf E \mathbf U^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix 9ikjtwsrk54q2ommh9xft6xaa5e41fr
:$\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t = \mathbf A$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \map {\mathbf A} 0 }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A + 0 \mathbf U \mathbf E \mathbf U^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix]] 9ikjtwsrk54q2ommh9xft6xaa5e41fr
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_1
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix" ]
[]
[ "Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix" ]
proofwiki-23627
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 2
:$\map {\mathbf A} t$ is normal for all values of $t$
Let $\mathbf D = \mathbf U^\dagger \mathbf D \mathbf U$ be the diagonalized version of $\mathbf A$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \mathbf A + t \mathbf U \mathbf E \mathbf U^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger + t \mathbf U \mathbf E \mathbf U^\dagger }} {{eq...
:$\map {\mathbf A} t$ is [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]] for all values of $t$
Let $\mathbf D = \mathbf U^\dagger \mathbf D \mathbf U$ be the [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalized]] version of $\mathbf A$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \mathbf A + t \mathbf U \mathbf E \mathbf U^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger + t \mathbf...
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_2
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Matrix Similarity", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of No...
proofwiki-23628
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 3
:$\map {\mathbf A} t$ has the same eigenvectors as $\mathbf A$ for all values of $t$
From Property $(2)$ of Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix, $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is normal. From Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices, $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is diagonalizable. From Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix, $\map {\mathbf A} t$ has the same eigenvectors as $\mathbf A$. {{qed}} Ca...
:$\map {\mathbf A} t$ has the same [[Definition:Eigenvector of Square Matrix|eigenvectors]] as $\mathbf A$ for all values of $t$
From Property $(2)$ of [[Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix]], $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]]. From [[Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices]], $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]]. From [[Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Mat...
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_3
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvector/Square Matrix" ]
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Eigenvector/Square Matrix", "Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Ma...
proofwiki-23629
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 5
:There exists $\tau > 0$ such that $0 < t < \tau \implies \map \sigma {\map {\mathbf A} t}$ is simple.
From Property $(2)$ of Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix, $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is normal. From Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices, $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is diagonalizable. From Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix, there exists $\tau > 0$ such that: :$0 < t < \tau \implies \map \sigma {\...
:There exists $\tau > 0$ such that $0 < t < \tau \implies \map \sigma {\map {\mathbf A} t}$ is [[Definition:Simple Eigenvalue|simple]].
From Property $(2)$ of [[Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix]], $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]]. From [[Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices]], $\map {\mathbf A} t$ is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]]. From [[Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Mat...
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix/Property 5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Normal_Matrix/Property_5
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Simple Eigenvalue" ]
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Simple Eigenvalue", "Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Normal Matrix" ]
proofwiki-23630
Halting Problem is Undecidable
No Turing machine can be programmed to determine whether an arbitrary Turing machine will halt on arbitrary input.
{{AimForCont}} there exists a Turing machine $\map H {T, I}$ that determines whether another Turing machine $T$ halts with input $I$: :$\map H {T, I} = \begin{cases} \text{true} & : T \text{ halts on input } I \\ \text{false} & : T \text{ never halts on input } I \end{cases}$ Then, the following Turing machine can be i...
No [[Definition:Turing Machine|Turing machine]] can be programmed to determine whether an [[Definition:Arbitrary|arbitrary]] [[Definition:Turing Machine|Turing machine]] will [[Definition:Halt|halt]] on [[Definition:Arbitrary|arbitrary]] input.
{{AimForCont}} there exists a [[Definition:Turing Machine|Turing machine]] $\map H {T, I}$ that determines whether another [[Definition:Turing Machine|Turing machine]] $T$ [[Definition:Halt|halts]] with input $I$: :$\map H {T, I} = \begin{cases} \text{true} & : T \text{ halts on input } I \\ \text{false} & : T \text{ n...
Halting Problem is Undecidable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Halting_Problem_is_Undecidable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Halting_Problem_is_Undecidable
[ "Halting Problem", "Turing Machines" ]
[ "Definition:Turing Machine", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Turing Machine", "Definition:Halt", "Definition:Arbitrary" ]
[ "Definition:Turing Machine", "Definition:Turing Machine", "Definition:Halt", "Definition:Turing Machine", "Definition:Halt", "Definition:Halt", "Definition:Halt", "Definition:Halt", "Definition:Halt", "Definition:Contradiction", "Category:Halting Problem", "Category:Turing Machines" ]
proofwiki-23631
Sum from 0 to Infinity of (r+1) x^r
Let $x \in \R$ such that $\size x < 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{r \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {r + 1} x^r | r = 1 + 2 x + 3 x^2 + 4 x^3 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\paren {1 - x}^2} | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
From Sum from $0$ to $n - 1$ of $\paren {r + 1} x^r$: :$\ds \sum_{r \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {r + 1} x^r = \dfrac {1 - x^n} {\paren {1 - x}^2} - \dfrac {n x^n} {1 - x}$ From Real Null Sequence: $n^\alpha x^n$: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} n x^n = 0$ Then we have that: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} x^n = 0$ ...
Let $x \in \R$ such that $\size x < 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{r \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {r + 1} x^r | r = 1 + 2 x + 3 x^2 + 4 x^3 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\paren {1 - x}^2} | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
From [[Sum from 0 to n-1 of (r+1) x^r|Sum from $0$ to $n - 1$ of $\paren {r + 1} x^r$]]: :$\ds \sum_{r \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {r + 1} x^r = \dfrac {1 - x^n} {\paren {1 - x}^2} - \dfrac {n x^n} {1 - x}$ From [[Real Null Sequence/Examples/n^alpha x^n|Real Null Sequence: $n^\alpha x^n$]]: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to ...
Sum from 0 to Infinity of (r+1) x^r/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_0_to_Infinity_of_(r+1)_x^r
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_0_to_Infinity_of_(r+1)_x^r/Proof_1
[ "Sum from 0 to Infinity of (r+1) x^r", "Examples of Power Series" ]
[]
[ "Sum from 0 to n-1 of (r+1) x^r", "Real Null Sequence/Examples/n^alpha x^n" ]
proofwiki-23632
Dirac Bra Grouping is Conjugate Linear
Let $\bra \alpha$ and $\bra \beta$ be bras in some dual space. Let $h$ and $k$ be scalars. Then: :$\bra {h \alpha + k \beta} = \bra \alpha h^\dagger + \bra \beta k^\dagger$ where $h^\dagger$ is the complex conjugate of $h$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \bra {h \alpha + k \beta} | r = \ket {h \alpha + k \beta}^* | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Bra|Bra}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {h \ket \alpha + k \ket \beta}^* | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Ket/Abuse of Notation|Ket notation}} }} {{eqn | r = h^\dagger \ket \alpha^* + k^\dagger \ket ...
Let $\bra \alpha$ and $\bra \beta$ be [[Definition:Dirac Notation/Bra|bras]] in some [[Definition:Dual Vector Space|dual space]]. Let $h$ and $k$ be [[Definition:Scalar|scalars]]. Then: :$\bra {h \alpha + k \beta} = \bra \alpha h^\dagger + \bra \beta k^\dagger$ where $h^\dagger$ is the [[Definition:Complex Conjugate...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \bra {h \alpha + k \beta} | r = \ket {h \alpha + k \beta}^* | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Bra|Bra}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {h \ket \alpha + k \ket \beta}^* | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Ket/Abuse of Notation|Ket notation}} }} {{eqn | r = h^\dagger \ket \alpha^* + k^\dagger \ket ...
Dirac Bra Grouping is Conjugate Linear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirac_Bra_Grouping_is_Conjugate_Linear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirac_Bra_Grouping_is_Conjugate_Linear
[ "Bras", "Dirac Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Dirac Notation/Bra", "Definition:Algebraic Dual/Vector Space", "Definition:Scalar", "Definition:Complex Conjugate" ]
[ "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Category:Bras", "Category:Dirac Notation" ]
proofwiki-23633
Linear Transform on Dirac Bra
Let $\bra x$ be a bra in some dual space. Let $T$ be a linear transform. Then: :$\bra x T = \bra {T^* x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \bra x T | r = \ket x^* T | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Bra|Bra}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {T^* \ket x}^* | c = Adjoint of Composition of Linear Transformations is Composition of Adjoints }} {{eqn | r = \ket {T^* x}^* | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Ket/Abuse of Notation|Ket n...
Let $\bra x$ be a [[Definition:Dirac Notation/Bra|bra]] in some [[Definition:Dual Vector Space|dual space]]. Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transform]]. Then: :$\bra x T = \bra {T^* x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \bra x T | r = \ket x^* T | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Bra|Bra}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {T^* \ket x}^* | c = [[Adjoint of Composition of Linear Transformations is Composition of Adjoints]] }} {{eqn | r = \ket {T^* x}^* | c = {{Defof|Dirac Notation/Ket/Abuse of Notation|K...
Linear Transform on Dirac Bra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transform_on_Dirac_Bra
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transform_on_Dirac_Bra
[ "Bras", "Dirac Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Dirac Notation/Bra", "Definition:Algebraic Dual/Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Transformation" ]
[ "Adjoint of Composition of Linear Transformations is Composition of Adjoints", "Category:Bras", "Category:Dirac Notation" ]
proofwiki-23634
Dirac Inner Product is Conjugate Linear in First Argument
Let $\ket \alpha$, $\ket \beta$, and $\ket \gamma$ be kets. Let $k$ be a scalar. Then: :$\braket {k \alpha + \beta} \gamma = \bar k \braket \alpha \gamma + \braket \beta \gamma$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \braket {k \alpha + \beta} \gamma | r = \overline {\braket \gamma {k \alpha + \beta} } | c = Inner product is conjugate symmetric }} {{eqn | r = \overline {k \braket \gamma \alpha + \braket \gamma \beta} | c = Dirac inner product is linear in the second argument }} {...
Let $\ket \alpha$, $\ket \beta$, and $\ket \gamma$ be [[Definition:Ket|kets]]. Let $k$ be a [[Definition:Scalar|scalar]]. Then: :$\braket {k \alpha + \beta} \gamma = \bar k \braket \alpha \gamma + \braket \beta \gamma$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \braket {k \alpha + \beta} \gamma | r = \overline {\braket \gamma {k \alpha + \beta} } | c = [[Definition:Inner Product|Inner product]] is [[Definition:Conjugate Symmetric Mapping|conjugate symmetric]] }} {{eqn | r = \overline {k \braket \gamma \alpha + \braket \gamma \bet...
Dirac Inner Product is Conjugate Linear in First Argument
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirac_Inner_Product_is_Conjugate_Linear_in_First_Argument
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirac_Inner_Product_is_Conjugate_Linear_in_First_Argument
[ "Dirac Notation", "Inner Products", "Quantum Mechanics" ]
[ "Definition:Dirac Notation/Ket", "Definition:Scalar" ]
[ "Definition:Inner Product", "Definition:Conjugate Symmetric Mapping", "Definition:Dirac Notation/Inner Product", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Sum of Complex Conjugates", "Product of Complex Conjugates", "Definition:Inner Product", "Definition:Conjugate Symmetric Mapping", "Category:Dirac Not...
proofwiki-23635
Power Series Expansion for Logarithm of m over n
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \ln {\frac m n} | r = 2 \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {2 n + 1} \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} }^{2 n + 1} }} {{eqn | r = 2 \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} + \frac 1 3 \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} }^3 + \frac 1 5 \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} }^5 + \frac 1 7 \paren {\frac {m - n...
From Power Series Expansion for $\map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} }$: :$(1): \quad \ds \map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} } = 2 \paren {x + \frac {x^3} 3 + \frac {x^5} 5 + \frac {x^7} 7 + \cdots}$ for $-1 < x \le 1$. Let $m, n \in \R_{>0}$. Let $x = \dfrac {m - n} {m + n}$. Then as $m$ and $n$ are both positive: :$0 < x ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \ln {\frac m n} | r = 2 \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {2 n + 1} \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} }^{2 n + 1} }} {{eqn | r = 2 \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} + \frac 1 3 \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} }^3 + \frac 1 5 \paren {\frac {m - n} {m + n} }^5 + \frac 1 7 \paren {\frac {m - n...
From [[Power Series Expansion for Half Logarithm of 1 + x over 1 - x|Power Series Expansion for $\map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} }$]]: :$(1): \quad \ds \map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} } = 2 \paren {x + \frac {x^3} 3 + \frac {x^5} 5 + \frac {x^7} 7 + \cdots}$ for $-1 < x \le 1$. Let $m, n \in \R_{>0}$. Let $x = \df...
Power Series Expansion for Logarithm of m over n
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Series_Expansion_for_Logarithm_of_m_over_n
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Series_Expansion_for_Logarithm_of_m_over_n
[ "Power Series Expansion for Logarithm of m over n", "Examples of Power Series", "Logarithms" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Half Logarithm of 1 + x over 1 - x", "Definition:Positive/Real Number" ]
proofwiki-23636
Sum from 1 to Infinity of x^r over r(r+1)
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{r \mathop = 1}^\infty \dfrac {x^r} {r \paren {r + 1} } | r = \dfrac x {1 \times 2} + \dfrac {x^2} {2 \times 3} + \dfrac {x^3} {3 \times 4} + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\dfrac 1 x - 1} \map \ln {1 - x} + 1 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} valid for $-1 \le x < 1$.
Let: :$S = \ds \sum_{r \mathop = 1}^\infty \dfrac {x^r} {r \paren {r + 1} }$ From Partial Fractions Expansion: $\dfrac 1 {x \paren {x + 1} }$: :$\dfrac 1 {r \paren {r + 1} } = \dfrac 1 r - \dfrac 1 {r + 1}$ and so: :$\dfrac {x^r} {r \paren {r + 1} } = \dfrac {x^r} r - \dfrac {x^r} {r + 1}$ Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{r \mathop = 1}^\infty \dfrac {x^r} {r \paren {r + 1} } | r = \dfrac x {1 \times 2} + \dfrac {x^2} {2 \times 3} + \dfrac {x^3} {3 \times 4} + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\dfrac 1 x - 1} \map \ln {1 - x} + 1 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} valid for $-1 \le x < 1$.
Let: :$S = \ds \sum_{r \mathop = 1}^\infty \dfrac {x^r} {r \paren {r + 1} }$ From [[Partial Fractions Expansion/Examples/1 over x(x+1)|Partial Fractions Expansion: $\dfrac 1 {x \paren {x + 1} }$]]: :$\dfrac 1 {r \paren {r + 1} } = \dfrac 1 r - \dfrac 1 {r + 1}$ and so: :$\dfrac {x^r} {r \paren {r + 1} } = \dfrac {x^...
Sum from 1 to Infinity of x^r over r(r+1)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_1_to_Infinity_of_x^r_over_r(r+1)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_1_to_Infinity_of_x^r_over_r(r+1)
[ "Examples of Power Series" ]
[]
[ "Partial Fractions Expansion/Examples/1 over x(x+1)", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Power Series Expansion for Logarithm of 1 - x" ]
proofwiki-23637
Polarization Identity/Complex Vector Space/Corollary
Let $\struct {V, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be an inner product space over $\C$. Let $\norm \cdot$ be the inner product norm on $V$. Then, we have: :$4 \innerprod x y = \norm {x + y}^2 - \norm {x - y}^2 + i \norm {x + i y}^2 - i \norm {x - iy}^2$ for each $x, y \in V$.
From Inner Product is Sesquilinear, the mapping $q : V \times V \to \C$ defined by: :$\map q {x, y} = \innerprod x y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in V \times V$ is sesquilinear. Define $Q : V \to \R$ by: :$\map Q x = \innerprod x x$ for each $x \in V$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}$ be the inner product norm of $\innerprod \cd...
Let $\struct {V, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be an [[Definition:Inner Product Space|inner product space]] over $\C$. Let $\norm \cdot$ be the [[Definition:Inner Product Norm|inner product norm]] on $V$. Then, we have: :$4 \innerprod x y = \norm {x + y}^2 - \norm {x - y}^2 + i \norm {x + i y}^2 - i \norm {x - iy}^2$...
From [[Inner Product is Sesquilinear]], the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $q : V \times V \to \C$ defined by: :$\map q {x, y} = \innerprod x y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in V \times V$ is [[Definition:Sesquilinear Form|sesquilinear]]. Define $Q : V \to \R$ by: :$\map Q x = \innerprod x x$ for each $x \in V$. Let $\no...
Polarization Identity/Complex Vector Space/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Polarization_Identity/Complex_Vector_Space/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Polarization_Identity/Complex_Vector_Space/Corollary
[ "Polarization Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Inner Product Space", "Definition:Inner Product Norm" ]
[ "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Sesquilinear Form", "Definition:Inner Product Norm", "Polarization Identity/Complex Vector Space", "Category:Polarization Identity" ]
proofwiki-23638
Densely-Defined Linear Operator with Real-Valued Quadratic Form is Symmetric
Let $\struct {\HH, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $\struct {\map D T, T}$ be a densely-defined linear operator such that: :$\innerprod {T x} x \in \R$ for each $x \in \map D T$. Then $T$ is symmetric.
Define $q : \map D T \times \map D T \to \C$ by: :$\map q {x, y} = \innerprod {T x} y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in \map D T \times \map D T$. To show that $T$ is symmetric, we establish that: :$\map q {x, y} = \overline {\map q {y, x} }$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in \map D T \times \map D T$. This will show that: :$\inn...
Let $\struct {\HH, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be a [[Definition:Hilbert Space|Hilbert space]]. Let $\struct {\map D T, T}$ be a [[Definition:Densely-Defined Linear Operator|densely-defined linear operator]] such that: :$\innerprod {T x} x \in \R$ for each $x \in \map D T$. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Symmetric Densely-De...
Define $q : \map D T \times \map D T \to \C$ by: :$\map q {x, y} = \innerprod {T x} y$ for each $\tuple {x, y} \in \map D T \times \map D T$. To show that $T$ is [[Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator|symmetric]], we establish that: :$\map q {x, y} = \overline {\map q {y, x} }$ for each $\tuple {x, y} ...
Densely-Defined Linear Operator with Real-Valued Quadratic Form is Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Densely-Defined_Linear_Operator_with_Real-Valued_Quadratic_Form_is_Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Densely-Defined_Linear_Operator_with_Real-Valued_Quadratic_Form_is_Symmetric
[ "Densely-Defined Linear Operators", "Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operators" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Space", "Definition:Densely-Defined Linear Operator", "Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator", "Polarization Identity/Complex Vector Space", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Sum of Complex Conjugates", "Product of Complex Conjugates", "Category:Densely-Defined Linear Operators", "Category:Symmetric Dens...
proofwiki-23639
Positive Linear Operator is Symmetric
Let $\struct {\HH, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $\struct {\map D T, T}$ be a positive linear operator. Then $T$ is symmetric.
From the definition of a positive linear operator, we have: :$\innerprod {T x} x \in \R$ for each $x \in \map D T$. Hence, from Densely-Defined Linear Operator with Real-Valued Quadratic Form is Symmetric, we have that $T$ is symmetric. {{qed}} Category:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operators b5zozm4pd19qllk82jw5e8p...
Let $\struct {\HH, \innerprod \cdot \cdot}$ be a [[Definition:Hilbert Space|Hilbert space]]. Let $\struct {\map D T, T}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Linear Operator|positive linear operator]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator|symmetric]].
From the definition of a [[Definition:Positive Linear Operator|positive linear operator]], we have: :$\innerprod {T x} x \in \R$ for each $x \in \map D T$. Hence, from [[Densely-Defined Linear Operator with Real-Valued Quadratic Form is Symmetric]], we have that $T$ is [[Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Ope...
Positive Linear Operator is Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Linear_Operator_is_Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Positive_Linear_Operator_is_Symmetric
[ "Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operators" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Space", "Definition:Positive Linear Operator", "Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Positive Linear Operator", "Densely-Defined Linear Operator with Real-Valued Quadratic Form is Symmetric", "Definition:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operator", "Category:Symmetric Densely-Defined Linear Operators" ]