id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-12800
4 Consecutive Integers cannot be Square-Free
Let $n, n + 1, n + 2, n + 3$ be four consecutive positive integers. At least one of these is not square-free.
Exactly one of $n, n + 1, n + 2, n + 3$ is divisible by $4 = 2^2$. Thus, by definition, one of these is not square-free. {{qed}}
Let $n, n + 1, n + 2, n + 3$ be four consecutive [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]]. At least one of these is not [[Definition:Square-Free|square-free]].
Exactly one of $n, n + 1, n + 2, n + 3$ is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $4 = 2^2$. Thus, by definition, one of these is not [[Definition:Square-Free|square-free]]. {{qed}}
4 Consecutive Integers cannot be Square-Free
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/4_Consecutive_Integers_cannot_be_Square-Free
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/4_Consecutive_Integers_cannot_be_Square-Free
[ "Square-Free Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Square-Free" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Square-Free" ]
proofwiki-12801
Sequence of 4 Consecutive Square-Free Triplets
The following sets of $4$ consecutive triplets of integers, with one integer between each triplet, are square-free: :$29, 30, 31; 33, 34, 35; 37, 38, 39; 41, 42, 43$ :$101, 102, 103; 105, 106, 107; 109, 110, 111; 113, 114, 115$
Note that $32, 36, 40$ and $104, 108, 112$ are all divisible by $4 = 2^2$, so are by definition not square-free. Then inspecting each number in turn: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 29 | o = | c = is prime }} {{eqn | l = 30 | r = 2 \times 3 \times 5 | c = and so is square-free }} {{eqn | l = 31 ...
The following sets of $4$ consecutive triplets of [[Definition:Integer|integers]], with one [[Definition:Integer|integer]] between each triplet, are [[Definition:Square-Free|square-free]]: :$29, 30, 31; 33, 34, 35; 37, 38, 39; 41, 42, 43$ :$101, 102, 103; 105, 106, 107; 109, 110, 111; 113, 114, 115$
Note that $32, 36, 40$ and $104, 108, 112$ are all [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $4 = 2^2$, so are by definition not [[Definition:Square-Free|square-free]]. Then inspecting each number in turn: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 29 | o = | c = is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] }} {{eqn | l = ...
Sequence of 4 Consecutive Square-Free Triplets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_4_Consecutive_Square-Free_Triplets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_4_Consecutive_Square-Free_Triplets
[ "Square-Free Integers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Square-Free" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Square-Free", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Square-Free", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Square-Free", "Definition:Square-Free", "Definition:Square-Free", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Square-Free", "Definition:Square-...
proofwiki-12802
Image of Doubleton under Mapping
Let $S, T$ be sets. Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping. Then: :$\forall x, y \in S: f \sqbrk {\set {x, y} } = \set {\map f x, \map f y}$
Let $x, y \in S$. Thus {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = f \sqbrk {\set {x, y} } | r = f \sqbrk {\set x \cup \set y} | c = Union of Unordered Tuples }} {{eqn | r = f \sqbrk {\set x} \cup f \sqbrk {\set y} | c = Image of Union under Mapping }} {{eqn | r = \set {\map f x} \cup \set {\map f y} | c = Image ...
Let $S, T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then: :$\forall x, y \in S: f \sqbrk {\set {x, y} } = \set {\map f x, \map f y}$
Let $x, y \in S$. Thus {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = f \sqbrk {\set {x, y} } | r = f \sqbrk {\set x \cup \set y} | c = [[Union of Unordered Tuples]] }} {{eqn | r = f \sqbrk {\set x} \cup f \sqbrk {\set y} | c = [[Image of Union under Mapping]] }} {{eqn | r = \set {\map f x} \cup \set {\map f y} | c...
Image of Doubleton under Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Doubleton_under_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Doubleton_under_Mapping
[ "Images", "Doubletons" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping" ]
[ "Union of Unordered Tuples", "Image of Union under Mapping", "Image of Singleton under Mapping", "Union of Unordered Tuples" ]
proofwiki-12803
Image under Increasing Mapping equal to Special Set is Complete Lattice
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a complete lattice. Let $f: S \to S$ be an increasing mapping. Let $P = \struct {M, \precsim}$ be an ordered subset of $L$ such that :$M = \set {x \in S: x = \map f x}$ Then $P$ is complete lattice.
We will prove that :$\forall X \subseteq M: \forall Y \subseteq S: Y = \left\{ {x \in S: x}\right.$ is upper bound for $\left.{X \land \map f x \preceq x}\right\} \implies \inf_L Y \in M$ Let $X \subseteq M$, $Y \subseteq S$ such that :$Y = \left\{ {x \in S: x}\right.$ is upper bound for $\left.{X \land \map f x \prece...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattice]]. Let $f: S \to S$ be an [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]]. Let $P = \struct {M, \precsim}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Subset|ordered subset]] of $L$ such that :$M = \set {x \in S: x = \map f x}$ The...
We will prove that :$\forall X \subseteq M: \forall Y \subseteq S: Y = \left\{ {x \in S: x}\right.$ is [[Definition:Upper Bound of Set|upper bound]] for $\left.{X \land \map f x \preceq x}\right\} \implies \inf_L Y \in M$ Let $X \subseteq M$, $Y \subseteq S$ such that :$Y = \left\{ {x \in S: x}\right.$ is [[Definition...
Image under Increasing Mapping equal to Special Set is Complete Lattice
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_under_Increasing_Mapping_equal_to_Special_Set_is_Complete_Lattice
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_under_Increasing_Mapping_equal_to_Special_Set_is_Complete_Lattice
[ "Complete Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Complete Lattice" ]
[ "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Transitive", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:U...
proofwiki-12804
Hensel's Lemma/First Form
Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $k > 0$ be a positive integer. Let $\map f X \in \Z \sqbrk X$ be a polynomial. Let $x_k \in \Z$ such that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x_k} | o = \equiv | r = 0 | rr= \pmod {p^k} }} {{eqn | l = \map {f'} {x_k} | o = \not \equiv | r = 0 | rr= \pmod...
We use induction on $l$. The base case $l = 0$ is trivial. Let $l \ge 0$ be such that a solution $x_{k + l}$ exists and is unique up to a multiple of $p^{k + l}$. Choose a solution $x_{k + l}$ satisfying: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x_{k + l} } | o = \equiv | r = 0 | rr= \pmod {p^{k + l} } }} {{...
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Let $k > 0$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Let $\map f X \in \Z \sqbrk X$ be a [[Definition:Polynomial (Abstract Algebra)|polynomial]]. Let $x_k \in \Z$ such that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x_k} | o = \equiv | r = 0 ...
We use [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $l$. The base case $l = 0$ is trivial. Let $l \ge 0$ be such that a solution $x_{k + l}$ exists and is unique up to a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|multiple]] of $p^{k + l}$. Choose a solution $x_{k + l}$ satisfying: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x_{k...
Hensel's Lemma/First Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hensel's_Lemma/First_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hensel's_Lemma/First_Form
[ "Hensel's Lemma" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Polynomial over Ring", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Congruence by Divisor of Modulus", "Taylor Expansion for Polynomials/Order 1", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-12805
Hensel's Lemma for Composite Numbers
Let $b \in \Z \setminus \set {-1, 0, 1}$ be an integer. Let $k > 0$ be a positive integer. Let $\map f X \in \Z \sqbrk X$ be a polynomial. Let $x_k \in \Z$ such that: :$\map f {x_k} \equiv 0 \pmod {b^k}$ :$\gcd \set {\map {f'} {x_k}, b} = 1$ Then for every integer $l \ge 0$, there exists an integer $x_{k + l}$ such tha...
We use induction on $l$. The base case $l = 0$ is trivial. Let $l \ge 0$ be such that a solution $x_{k + l}$ exists and is unique up to a multiple of $b^{k + l}$. Choose a solution $x_{k + l}$. Each solution $x_{k + l + 1}$ is also a solution of the previous congruence. By uniqueness, it has to satisfy $x_{k + l + 1} \...
Let $b \in \Z \setminus \set {-1, 0, 1}$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Let $k > 0$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Let $\map f X \in \Z \sqbrk X$ be a [[Definition:Polynomial (Abstract Algebra)|polynomial]]. Let $x_k \in \Z$ such that: :$\map f {x_k} \equiv 0 \pmod {b^k}$ :$\gcd \set {...
We use [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $l$. The base case $l = 0$ is trivial. Let $l \ge 0$ be such that a solution $x_{k + l}$ exists and is unique up to a multiple of $b^{k + l}$. Choose a solution $x_{k + l}$. Each solution $x_{k + l + 1}$ is also a solution of the previous congruence. By u...
Hensel's Lemma for Composite Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hensel's_Lemma_for_Composite_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hensel's_Lemma_for_Composite_Numbers
[ "Hensel's Lemma" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Polynomial over Ring", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Integers" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Taylor Expansion for Polynomials/Order 1", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-12806
Divisor Sum of Power of 2
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a power of $2$. Then: :$\map {\sigma_1} n = 2 n - 1$
Let $n = 2^k$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_1} n | r = \dfrac {2^{k + 1} - 1} {2 - 1} | c = Divisor Sum of Power of Prime }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 2^k - 1 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 n - 1 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Divisor Sum Function Category:2 5adh8ba8ttxo6k4732otbkyj3...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Integer Power|power]] of $2$. Then: :$\map {\sigma_1} n = 2 n - 1$
Let $n = 2^k$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\sigma_1} n | r = \dfrac {2^{k + 1} - 1} {2 - 1} | c = [[Divisor Sum of Power of Prime]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 \times 2^k - 1 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 n - 1 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Divisor Sum Function]] [[Category:2]] 5adh8ba8ttx...
Divisor Sum of Power of 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Divisor_Sum_of_Power_of_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Divisor_Sum_of_Power_of_2
[ "Divisor Sum Function", "2" ]
[ "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Divisor Sum of Power of Prime", "Category:Divisor Sum Function", "Category:2" ]
proofwiki-12807
Equivalence of Definitions of Saturation Under Equivalence Relation
Let $\sim$ be an equivalence relation on a set $S$. Let $T \subset S$ be a subset. {{TFAE|def = Saturation (Equivalence Relation)|view = saturation}}
=== Definitions 1 and 2 are equivalent === {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \bigcup_{t \mathop \in T} \eqclass t \sim | r = \set {s \in S: \exists t \in T: s \in \eqclass t \sim} | c = {{Defof|Union of Family of Subsets}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {s \in S: \exists t \in T: s \sim t} | c = {{Defof|Equivalence Clas...
Let $\sim$ be an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. Let $T \subset S$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]]. {{TFAE|def = Saturation (Equivalence Relation)|view = saturation}}
=== Definitions 1 and 2 are equivalent === {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \bigcup_{t \mathop \in T} \eqclass t \sim | r = \set {s \in S: \exists t \in T: s \in \eqclass t \sim} | c = {{Defof|Union of Family of Subsets}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {s \in S: \exists t \in T: s \sim t} | c = {{Defof|Equivalence Cla...
Equivalence of Definitions of Saturation Under Equivalence Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Saturation_Under_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Saturation_Under_Equivalence_Relation
[ "Equivalence Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset" ]
[]
proofwiki-12808
Equivalence of Definitions of Saturated Set Under Equivalence Relation
Let $\sim$ be an equivalence relation on a set $S$. Let $T \subset S$ be a subset. {{TFAE|def = Saturated Set (Equivalence Relation)|view = saturated set|context = Equivalence Relation}}
=== 1 implies 2 === Let $T = \overline T$. By definition of saturation: :$T = \ds \bigcup_{t \mathop \in T} \eqclass t {}$ so we can take $U = T$. {{qed}}
Let $\sim$ be an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. Let $T \subset S$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]]. {{TFAE|def = Saturated Set (Equivalence Relation)|view = saturated set|context = Equivalence Relation}}
=== 1 implies 2 === Let $T = \overline T$. By definition of [[Definition:Saturation (Equivalence Relation)|saturation]]: :$T = \ds \bigcup_{t \mathop \in T} \eqclass t {}$ so we can take $U = T$. {{qed}}
Equivalence of Definitions of Saturated Set Under Equivalence Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Saturated_Set_Under_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Saturated_Set_Under_Equivalence_Relation
[ "Equivalence Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Saturation (Equivalence Relation)", "Definition:Saturation (Equivalence Relation)", "Definition:Saturation (Equivalence Relation)" ]
proofwiki-12809
Compact Subset is Bounded Below Join Semilattice
Let $L = \left({S, \vee, \preceq}\right)$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $P = \left({K\left({L}\right), \precsim}\right)$ be an ordered subset of $L$, where $K\left({L}\right)$ denotes the compact subset of $L$. Then $P$ is a bounded below join semilattice.
By Bottom is Compact: :$\bot_L$ is a compact element, where $\bot_L$ denotes the smallest element in $L$. By definition of compact subset: :$\bot_L \in K \left({L} \right)$ By definition of the smallest element: :$\forall x \in K\left({L}\right): \bot_L \preceq x$ By definition of ordered subset: :$\forall x \in K\left...
Let $L = \left({S, \vee, \preceq}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below Set|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $P = \left({K\left({L}\right), \precsim}\right)$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Subset|ordered subset]] of $L$, where $K\left({L}\right)$ denotes the [[Definition:Compact Sub...
By [[Bottom is Compact]]: :$\bot_L$ is a [[Definition:Compact Element|compact element]], where $\bot_L$ denotes the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]] in $L$. By definition of [[Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice|compact subset]]: :$\bot_L \in K \left({L} \right)$ By definition of the [[Definition:Sma...
Compact Subset is Bounded Below Join Semilattice
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subset_is_Bounded_Below_Join_Semilattice
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subset_is_Bounded_Below_Join_Semilattice
[ "Join and Meet Semilattices" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Join Semilattice" ]
[ "Bottom is Compact", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Compact Subset is Join Subsemilattice", "Definition:Join Semilattice" ]
proofwiki-12810
Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Quadratic Functional to be Positive Definite/Lemma 2
Let $\map h x : \closedint a b \to \R$ be continuously differentiable $\forall x \in \closedint a b$. Suppose the function $\map h x$ satisfies the equation: :$-\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\paren {t P + \paren {1 - t} } h'} + t Q h = 0$ subject to the boundary conditions: :$\map h {a, t} = \map h {b, t} = 0$ Then: :$\ds ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | r = \int_a^b \paren 0 h \rd x }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b \paren {-\map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\paren {t P + \paren {1 - t} } h'} + t Q h } h \rd x }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b t Q h^2 \rd x - \int_a^b h \map \d {\paren {t P + \paren {1 - t} } h'} }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b t Q h^2 \rd x - h \bigin...
Let $\map h x : \closedint a b \to \R$ be [[Definition:Continuously Differentiable|continuously differentiable]] $\forall x \in \closedint a b$. Suppose the function $\map h x$ satisfies the equation: :$-\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\paren {t P + \paren {1 - t} } h'} + t Q h = 0$ subject to the boundary conditions: :$...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0 | r = \int_a^b \paren 0 h \rd x }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b \paren {-\map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\paren {t P + \paren {1 - t} } h'} + t Q h } h \rd x }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b t Q h^2 \rd x - \int_a^b h \map \d {\paren {t P + \paren {1 - t} } h'} }} {{eqn | r = \int_a^b t Q h^2 \rd x - h \bigin...
Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Quadratic Functional to be Positive Definite/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Necessary_and_Sufficient_Condition_for_Quadratic_Functional_to_be_Positive_Definite/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Necessary_and_Sufficient_Condition_for_Quadratic_Functional_to_be_Positive_Definite/Lemma_2
[ "Calculus of Variations" ]
[ "Definition:Continuously Differentiable" ]
[ "Integration by Parts" ]
proofwiki-12811
Jacobi's Necessary Condition
Let $J$ be a functional, such that: :$J \sqbrk y = \ds \int_a^b \map F {x, y, y'} \rd x$ Let $\map y x$ correspond to the minimum of $J$. Let: :$F_{y'y'}>0$ along $\map y x$. Then the open interval $\openint a b$ contains no points conjugate to $a$.
By Necessary Condition for Twice Differentiable Functional to have Minimum, $J$ is minimised by $y = \map {\hat y} x$ if: :$\delta^2 J \sqbrk {\hat y; h} \ge 0$ for all admissable real functions $h$. By lemma 1 of Legendre's Condition, :$\ds \delta^2 J \sqbrk {y; h} = \int_a^b \paren {P h'^2 + Q h^2} \rd x$ where: :$P...
Let $J$ be a [[Definition:Real Functional|functional]], such that: :$J \sqbrk y = \ds \int_a^b \map F {x, y, y'} \rd x$ Let $\map y x$ correspond to the [[Definition:Minimum Value of Functional|minimum]] of $J$. Let: :$F_{y'y'}>0$ along $\map y x$. Then the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval]] $\openi...
By [[Necessary Condition for Twice Differentiable Functional to have Minimum]], $J$ is minimised by $y = \map {\hat y} x$ if: :$\delta^2 J \sqbrk {\hat y; h} \ge 0$ for all admissable [[Definition:Real Function|real functions]] $h$. By [[Legendre's Condition/Lemma 1|lemma 1 of Legendre's Condition]], :$\ds \delta^...
Jacobi's Necessary Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Jacobi's_Necessary_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Jacobi's_Necessary_Condition
[ "Calculus of Variations" ]
[ "Definition:Functional/Real", "Definition:Minimum Value of Functional", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Conjugate Point (Calculus of Variations)" ]
[ "Necessary Condition for Twice Differentiable Functional to have Minimum", "Definition:Real Function", "Legendre's Condition/Lemma 1", "Nonnegative Quadratic Functional implies no Interior Conjugate Points", "Definition:Conjugate Point (Calculus of Variations)" ]
proofwiki-12812
Stolz-Cesàro Theorem
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be a sequence. {{explain|Domain of $\sequence {a_n}$ -- $\R$ presumably but could it be $\C$?}} Let $\sequence {b_n}$ be a sequence of (strictly) positive real numbers such that: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^\infty b_n = \infty$ If: :$\ds \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} \dfrac {a_n} {b_n} = L \in \R$ th...
Define the following sums: :$\ds A_n = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n a_i$ :$\ds B_n = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n b_i$ Let $\epsilon > 0$ and $\mu = \dfrac {\epsilon} 2$. By the definition of convergent sequences, there exists $k \in \N$ such that: :$\forall n > k: \paren {L - \mu} b_n < a_n < \paren {L + \mu} b_n$ Rewrite the su...
Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]]. {{explain|Domain of $\sequence {a_n}$ -- $\R$ presumably but could it be $\C$?}} Let $\sequence {b_n}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|(strictly) positive real numbers]] such that: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = ...
Define the following sums: :$\ds A_n = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n a_i$ :$\ds B_n = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n b_i$ Let $\epsilon > 0$ and $\mu = \dfrac {\epsilon} 2$. By the definition of [[Definition:Convergent Sequence (Analysis)|convergent sequences]], there exists $k \in \N$ such that: :$\forall n > k: \paren {L - \mu}...
Stolz-Cesàro Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stolz-Cesàro_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Stolz-Cesàro_Theorem
[ "Analysis", "Limits of Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number" ]
[ "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Analysis", "Reciprocal of Null Sequence", "Combination Theorem for Sequences", "Definition:Sequence" ]
proofwiki-12813
Bottom is Compact
Let $L$ be a bounded below ordered set. Then $\bot$ is a compact element where $\bot$ is the smallest element in $L$.
By Bottom is Way Below Any Element: :$\bot \ll \bot$ where $\ll$ denotes the way below relation. Hence $\bot$ is a compact element. {{qed}}
Let $L$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below Set|bounded below]] [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Then $\bot$ is a [[Definition:Compact Element|compact element]] where $\bot$ is the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]] in $L$.
By [[Bottom is Way Below Any Element]]: :$\bot \ll \bot$ where $\ll$ denotes the [[Definition:Element is Way Below|way below relation]]. Hence $\bot$ is a [[Definition:Compact Element|compact element]]. {{qed}}
Bottom is Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bottom_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bottom_is_Compact
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Smallest Element" ]
[ "Bottom is Way Below Any Element", "Definition:Element is Way Below", "Definition:Compact Element" ]
proofwiki-12814
Saturation Under Equivalence Relation in Terms of Graph
Let $\RR \subset S \times S$ be an equivalence relation on a set $S$. Let $\pr_1, \pr_2 : S \times S \to S$ denote the projections. Let $T\subset S$ be a subset. Let $\overline T$ denote its saturation. Then the following hold: :$\overline T = \map {\pr_1} {\RR \cap \map {\pr_2^{-1} } T}$ :$\overline T = \map {\pr_2} {...
Let $s \in S$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = s \in \map {\pr_1} {\RR \cap \map {\pr_2^{-1} } T} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \exists t \in S: \tuple {s, t} \in \RR \cap \map {\pr_2^{-1} } T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \ex...
Let $\RR \subset S \times S$ be an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. Let $\pr_1, \pr_2 : S \times S \to S$ denote the [[Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)|projections]]. Let $T\subset S$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]]. Let $\overline T$ denote its [[Defi...
Let $s \in S$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = s \in \map {\pr_1} {\RR \cap \map {\pr_2^{-1} } T} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \exists t \in S: \tuple {s, t} \in \RR \cap \map {\pr_2^{-1} } T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \...
Saturation Under Equivalence Relation in Terms of Graph
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Saturation_Under_Equivalence_Relation_in_Terms_of_Graph
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Saturation_Under_Equivalence_Relation_in_Terms_of_Graph
[ "Equivalence Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Saturation (Equivalence Relation)" ]
[ "Category:Equivalence Relations" ]
proofwiki-12815
Nonnegative Quadratic Functional implies no Interior Conjugate Points
If the quadratic functional :$\ds \int_a^b \paren {P h'^2 + Q h^2} \rd x$ where: :$\forall x \in \closedint a b: \map P x > 0$ is nonnegative for all $\map h x$: :$\map h a = \map h b = 0$ then the closed interval $\closedint a b$ contains no inside points conjugate to $a$. In other words, the open interval $\openint ...
Consider the functional: :$\forall t \in \closedint 0 1: \ds \int_a^b \paren {t \paren {P h^2 + Q h'^2} + \paren {1 - t} h'^2} \rd x$ By assumption: :$\ds \int_a^b \paren {P h'^2 + Q h^2} \rd x \ge 0$ For $t = 1$, Euler's Equation reads: :$\map {h''} x = 0$ which, along with condition $\map h a = 0$, is solved by: :$\m...
If the [[Definition:Quadratic Functional|quadratic functional]] :$\ds \int_a^b \paren {P h'^2 + Q h^2} \rd x$ where: :$\forall x \in \closedint a b: \map P x > 0$ is nonnegative for all $\map h x$: :$\map h a = \map h b = 0$ then the [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] $\closedint a b$ contains n...
Consider the [[Definition:Real Functional|functional]]: :$\forall t \in \closedint 0 1: \ds \int_a^b \paren {t \paren {P h^2 + Q h'^2} + \paren {1 - t} h'^2} \rd x$ By assumption: :$\ds \int_a^b \paren {P h'^2 + Q h^2} \rd x \ge 0$ For $t = 1$, [[Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation|Euler's Equation]...
Nonnegative Quadratic Functional implies no Interior Conjugate Points
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Nonnegative_Quadratic_Functional_implies_no_Interior_Conjugate_Points
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Nonnegative_Quadratic_Functional_implies_no_Interior_Conjugate_Points
[ "Calculus of Variations" ]
[ "Definition:Quadratic Functional", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Conjugate Point (Calculus of Variations)", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Conjugate Point (Calculus of Variations)" ]
[ "Definition:Functional/Real", "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation", "Definition:Conjugate Point (Calculus of Variations)", "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation", "Definition:Differential Equation/Solution", "Definition:Conjugate Point (Calculus of Variations)", "Necessar...
proofwiki-12816
Projection of Subset is Open iff Saturation is Open
Let $\sim$ be an equivalence relation on a topological space $\struct {X, \tau}$. Let $p$ denote the quotient mapping induced by $\sim$. Let $\tau_\sim$ be the quotient topology on $X / \sim$ by $p$. Let $\struct {X / \sim, \tau_\sim}$ be the quotient space of $X$ by $\sim$. Let $U \subset X$. {{TFAE}} {{begin-itemize}...
By definition of quotient topology, $\map p U$ is open in $\struct {X / \sim, \tau_\sim}$ {{iff}} $\map {p^{-1} } {\map p U}$ is open in $\struct {X, \tau}$. {{qed}}
Let $\sim$ be an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] $\struct {X, \tau}$. Let $p$ denote the [[Definition:Quotient Mapping|quotient mapping induced by $\sim$]]. Let $\tau_\sim$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Topology|quotient topology]] on $X ...
By definition of [[Definition:Quotient Topology|quotient topology]], $\map p U$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $\struct {X / \sim, \tau_\sim}$ {{iff}} $\map {p^{-1} } {\map p U}$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $\struct {X, \tau}$. {{qed}}
Projection of Subset is Open iff Saturation is Open/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_of_Subset_is_Open_iff_Saturation_is_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_of_Subset_is_Open_iff_Saturation_is_Open/Proof_1
[ "Projection of Subset is Open iff Saturation is Open", "Quotient Spaces (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Quotient Mapping", "Definition:Quotient Topology", "Definition:Quotient Topology/Quotient Space", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Saturation (Equivalence Relation)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Quotient Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
proofwiki-12817
Compact Closure of Element is Principal Ideal on Compact Subset iff Element is Compact
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a bounded below algebraic join semilattice. Let $P = \struct {\map K L, \precsim}$ be an ordered subset of $L$ where $\map K L$ denotes the compact subset of $L$. Let $x \in S$. Then $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ is principal ideal in $P$ {{iff}} $x$ is a compact element.
=== Sufficient Condition === Assume that :$x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ is principal ideal in $P$. By definitions of compact subset and compact closure: :$x^{\mathrm{compact} } \subseteq \map K L$ By definition of principal ideal: :$\exists y \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }: y$ is upper bound for $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ in $P$. By...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below Set|bounded below]] [[Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set|algebraic]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $P = \struct {\map K L, \precsim}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Subset|ordered subset]] of $L$ where $\map K L$ denotes the [[Defi...
=== Sufficient Condition === Assume that :$x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ is [[Definition:Principal Ideal of Preordered Set|principal ideal]] in $P$. By definitions of [[Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice|compact subset]] and [[Definition:Compact Closure|compact closure]]: :$x^{\mathrm{compact} } \subseteq \map K L$ By de...
Compact Closure of Element is Principal Ideal on Compact Subset iff Element is Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Closure_of_Element_is_Principal_Ideal_on_Compact_Subset_iff_Element_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Closure_of_Element_is_Principal_Ideal_on_Compact_Subset_iff_Element_is_Compact
[ "Principal Ideals of Preordered Sets", "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Preordered Set", "Definition:Compact Element" ]
[ "Definition:Principal Ideal of Preordered Set", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Compact Closure", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Preordered Set", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Definiti...
proofwiki-12818
Multiple of 6 is Semiperfect
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a multiple of $6$. Then $n$ is semiperfect.
Let $n = 6 k$. Then: :$n = 2 \times 3 k$ and so $3 k$ is a factor of $n$. :$n = 3 \times 2 k$ and so $2 k$ is a factor of $n$. :$n = 6 \times k$ and so $k$ is a factor of $n$. But: :$n = k + 2 k + 3 k$ and so is the sum of a subset of its factors Hence the result by definition of semiperfect. {{qed}} Category:Semiperfe...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Multiple of Integer|multiple]] of $6$. Then $n$ is [[Definition:Semiperfect Number|semiperfect]].
Let $n = 6 k$. Then: :$n = 2 \times 3 k$ and so $3 k$ is a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|factor]] of $n$. :$n = 3 \times 2 k$ and so $2 k$ is a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|factor]] of $n$. :$n = 6 \times k$ and so $k$ is a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|factor]] of $n$. But: :$n = k + 2 k + 3 k$ and so is th...
Multiple of 6 is Semiperfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiple_of_6_is_Semiperfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiple_of_6_is_Semiperfect
[ "Semiperfect Numbers", "6" ]
[ "Definition:Multiple/Integer", "Definition:Semiperfect Number" ]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Semiperfect Number", "Category:Semiperfect Numbers", "Category:6" ]
proofwiki-12819
Open Projection and Closed Graph Implies Quotient is Hausdorff
Let $\RR \subseteq X \times X$ be an equivalence relation on a topological space $\struct {X, \tau}$. Let $X / \RR$ be the quotient space. Let $p$ denote the quotient mapping. Let: :$\RR$ be closed in $X \times X$ :$p$ be an open mapping. Then $X / \RR$ is Hausdorff.
Let $\eqclass x \RR, \eqclass y \RR \in X / \RR$ such that $\eqclass x \RR \ne \eqclass y \RR$. Then $\tuple {x, y} \notin \RR$. Since $\RR$ is closed, $\paren {X \times X} \setminus \RR$ is open. Let: :$\BB = \set { U \times V : U, V \in \tau}$ By Natural Basis of Product Topology, $\BB$ is a basis for the product top...
Let $\RR \subseteq X \times X$ be an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] $\struct {X, \tau}$. Let $X / \RR$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Space (Topology)|quotient space]]. Let $p$ denote the [[Definition:Quotient Mapping|quotient mapping]]. ...
Let $\eqclass x \RR, \eqclass y \RR \in X / \RR$ such that $\eqclass x \RR \ne \eqclass y \RR$. Then $\tuple {x, y} \notin \RR$. Since $\RR$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]], $\paren {X \times X} \setminus \RR$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]]. Let: :$\BB = \set { U \times V : U, V \in \tau}$...
Open Projection and Closed Graph Implies Quotient is Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Projection_and_Closed_Graph_Implies_Quotient_is_Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Projection_and_Closed_Graph_Implies_Quotient_is_Hausdorff
[ "Hausdorff Spaces", "Quotient Spaces (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Quotient Topology/Quotient Space", "Definition:Quotient Mapping", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Mapping", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Natural Basis of Product Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Open Mapping", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-12820
Subgroup is Closed iff Quotient is Hausdorff
Let $G$ be a topological group. Let $H \le G$ be a subgroup. Let $G / H$ be their quotient. {{TFAE}} {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(1):|$H$ is closed in $G$}} {{item|(2):|$G / H$ is Hausdorff}} {{end-itemize}}
{{ProofWanted|use Group Acts by Homeomorphisms Implies Projection on Quotient Space is Open and Open Projection and Closed Graph Implies Quotient is Hausdorff}} Category:Topological Groups Category:Hausdorff Spaces q2a4yzdbsj9cz236j6j2e36yywa9a9o
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Topological Group|topological group]]. Let $H \le G$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]]. Let $G / H$ be their [[Definition:Quotient of Topological Groups|quotient]]. {{TFAE}} {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(1):|$H$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $G$}} {{item|(2):|$G / H$ is...
{{ProofWanted|use [[Group Acts by Homeomorphisms Implies Projection on Quotient Space is Open]] and [[Open Projection and Closed Graph Implies Quotient is Hausdorff]]}} [[Category:Topological Groups]] [[Category:Hausdorff Spaces]] q2a4yzdbsj9cz236j6j2e36yywa9a9o
Subgroup is Closed iff Quotient is Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_is_Closed_iff_Quotient_is_Hausdorff
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_is_Closed_iff_Quotient_is_Hausdorff
[ "Topological Groups", "Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Quotient of Topological Groups", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:T2 Space" ]
[ "Group Acts by Homeomorphisms Implies Projection on Quotient Space is Open", "Open Projection and Closed Graph Implies Quotient is Hausdorff", "Category:Topological Groups", "Category:Hausdorff Spaces" ]
proofwiki-12821
Higher Homotopy Groups are Abelian
Let $T = \left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a topological space. Let $x_0 \in S$. Let $n \ge 2$ be a integer. Let $\pi_n \left({T, x_0}\right)$ be the $n$th homotopy group with base point $x_0$. Then $\pi_n \left({T, x_0}\right)$ is abelian.
{{proof wanted}} Category:Homotopy Theory Category:Algebraic Topology g4qe2zuesl24pqvto0uiq5uikf4igaz
Let $T = \left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $x_0 \in S$. Let $n \ge 2$ be a [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Let $\pi_n \left({T, x_0}\right)$ be the $n$th [[Definition:Homotopy Group|homotopy group]] with base point $x_0$. Then $\pi_n \left({T, x_0}\right)$ is [[De...
{{proof wanted}} [[Category:Homotopy Theory]] [[Category:Algebraic Topology]] g4qe2zuesl24pqvto0uiq5uikf4igaz
Higher Homotopy Groups are Abelian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Higher_Homotopy_Groups_are_Abelian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Higher_Homotopy_Groups_are_Abelian
[ "Homotopy Theory", "Algebraic Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Homotopy Group", "Definition:Abelian Group" ]
[ "Category:Homotopy Theory", "Category:Algebraic Topology" ]
proofwiki-12822
Multiple of Semiperfect Number is Semiperfect
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a semiperfect number. Let $k \in \Z_{>0}$ be a (strictly) positive integer. Then $k n$ is also a semiperfect number.
Let $P$ be a subset of the divisors of $n$ such that the sum of the elements of $P$ equals $n$. Let $\sigma = \ds \sum_{p \mathop \in P} p$ be the sum of the elements of $P$. Let: :$Q = \set {k p: p \in P}$ be the set of elements of $P$ multiplied by $k$. We have by definition that: :$\forall p \in P: p \divides P$ whe...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Semiperfect Number|semiperfect number]]. Let $k \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Then $k n$ is also a [[Definition:Semiperfect Number|semiperfect number]].
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]] of $n$ such that the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of the [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $P$ equals $n$. Let $\sigma = \ds \sum_{p \mathop \in P} p$ be the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of the [[Definition:Eleme...
Multiple of Semiperfect Number is Semiperfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiple_of_Semiperfect_Number_is_Semiperfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiple_of_Semiperfect_Number_is_Semiperfect
[ "Semiperfect Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Semiperfect Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Semiperfect Number" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Divisor (Algeb...
proofwiki-12823
Image of Compact Subset under Directed Suprema Preserving Closure Operator is Subset of Compact Subset
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be an algebric lattice. Let $c: S \to S$ be a closure operator that preserves directed suprema. Then: :$c \sqbrk {\map K L} \subseteq \map K {\struct {c \sqbrk S, \precsim} }$ where: :$\map K L$ denotes the compact subset of $L$ :$c \sqbrk S$ denotes the image of $S$ under $c$ :$\mathord ...
Let $x \in c \sqbrk {\map K L}$. By definition of image of set: :$\exists y \in \map K L: x = \map c y$ and :$x \in c \sqbrk S$ By definition of compact subset: :$y$ is compact in $L$. By definition of compact element: :$y \ll y$ where $\ll$ denotes the way below relation. Define $P = \struct {c \sqbrk S, \precsim}$ as...
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be an [[Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set|algebric]] [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattice]]. Let $c: S \to S$ be a [[Definition:Closure Operator|closure operator]] that [[Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/Directed|preserves directed suprema]]. Then: :$c \sqbrk {\map K L} \sub...
Let $x \in c \sqbrk {\map K L}$. By definition of [[Definition:Image of Subset under Mapping|image of set]]: :$\exists y \in \map K L: x = \map c y$ and :$x \in c \sqbrk S$ By definition of [[Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice|compact subset]]: :$y$ is [[Definition:Compact Element|compact]] in $L$. By definition o...
Image of Compact Subset under Directed Suprema Preserving Closure Operator is Subset of Compact Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Compact_Subset_under_Directed_Suprema_Preserving_Closure_Operator_is_Subset_of_Compact_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Compact_Subset_under_Directed_Suprema_Preserving_Closure_Operator_is_Subset_of_Compact_Subset
[ "Continuous Lattices", "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set", "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Closure Operator", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/Directed", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Element is Way Below", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Ordered Subset",...
proofwiki-12824
Integers such that all Coprime and Less are Prime
The following positive integers have the property that all positive integers less than and coprime to it, excluding $1$, are prime: :$1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30$ {{OEIS|A048597}} There are no other positive integers with this property.
Let $S_n$ denote the set of all positive integers less than and coprime to $n$, excluding $1$. Let $\map P n$ denote the propositional function: :All positive integers less than and coprime to $n$, excluding $1$, are prime. We establish that $\map P n = \T$ for all the positive integers given: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l =...
The following [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] have the property that all [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] less than and [[Definition:Coprime Integers|coprime]] to it, excluding $1$, are [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]: :$1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30$ {{OEIS|A048597}} There are ...
Let $S_n$ denote the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] less than and [[Definition:Coprime Integers|coprime]] to $n$, excluding $1$. Let $\map P n$ denote the [[Definition:Propositional Function|propositional function]]: :All [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]...
Integers such that all Coprime and Less are Prime
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_such_that_all_Coprime_and_Less_are_Prime
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_such_that_all_Coprime_and_Less_are_Prime
[ "Euler Phi Function" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Propositional Function", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Defi...
proofwiki-12825
Pythagorean Triangles whose Area equal their Perimeter
There exist exactly $2$ Pythagorean triples which define a Pythagorean triangle whose area equals its perimeter: :$(1): \quad \tuple {6, 8, 10}$, leading to an area and perimeter of $24$ :$(2): \quad \tuple {5, 12, 13}$, leading to an area and perimeter of $30$.
From Area of Right Triangle, the area $\AA$ is: :$\AA = \dfrac {a b} 2$ where $a$ and $b$ are the legs. $(1): \quad$ The area of the $\tuple {6, 8, 10}$ triangle is $\dfrac {6 \times 8} 2 = 24$. Its perimeter equals $6 + 8 + 10 = 24$. $(2): \quad$ The area of the $\tuple {5, 12, 13}$ triangle is $\dfrac {5 \times 12} 2...
There exist exactly $2$ [[Definition:Pythagorean Triple|Pythagorean triples]] which define a [[Definition:Pythagorean Triangle|Pythagorean triangle]] whose [[Definition:Area|area]] equals its [[Definition:Perimeter|perimeter]]: :$(1): \quad \tuple {6, 8, 10}$, leading to an [[Definition:Area|area]] and [[Definition:Pe...
From [[Area of Right Triangle]], the [[Definition:Area|area]] $\AA$ is: :$\AA = \dfrac {a b} 2$ where $a$ and $b$ are the [[Definition:Leg of Right Triangle|legs]]. $(1): \quad$ The [[Definition:Area|area]] of the $\tuple {6, 8, 10}$ [[Definition:Pythagorean Triangle|triangle]] is $\dfrac {6 \times 8} 2 = 24$. Its [[...
Pythagorean Triangles whose Area equal their Perimeter
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pythagorean_Triangles_whose_Area_equal_their_Perimeter
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pythagorean_Triangles_whose_Area_equal_their_Perimeter
[ "Pythagorean Triangles", "24", "30" ]
[ "Definition:Pythagorean Triple", "Definition:Pythagorean Triangle", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Perimeter", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Perimeter", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Perimeter" ]
[ "Area of Right Triangle", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled/Legs", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Pythagorean Triangle", "Definition:Perimeter", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Pythagorean Triangle", "Definition:Perimeter", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Defini...
proofwiki-12826
Separable Extension is Contained in Galois Extension
Let $E/F$ be a separable finite field extension. Then there exists a finite field extension $L/E$ such that $L/F$ is Galois.
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Galois Theory lh89mtvcdjlsiei1e74gdkpyl4lil3k
Let $E/F$ be a [[Definition:Separable Extension|separable]] [[Definition:Finite Field Extension|finite field extension]]. Then there exists a [[Definition:Finite Field Extension|finite field extension]] $L/E$ such that $L/F$ is [[Definition:Galois Extension|Galois]].
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Galois Theory]] lh89mtvcdjlsiei1e74gdkpyl4lil3k
Separable Extension is Contained in Galois Extension
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Separable_Extension_is_Contained_in_Galois_Extension
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Separable_Extension_is_Contained_in_Galois_Extension
[ "Galois Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Separable Extension", "Definition:Field Extension/Degree/Finite", "Definition:Field Extension/Degree/Finite", "Definition:Galois Extension" ]
[ "Category:Galois Theory" ]
proofwiki-12827
Galois Extension is Galois over Intermediate Field
Let $L / F$ be a Galois Extension. Let $E$ be an intermediate field. Then $L / E$ is Galois.
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Galois Theory s3zuqy3xgnauel2aduazzo1ksnwjq25
Let $L / F$ be a [[Definition:Galois Extension|Galois Extension]]. Let $E$ be an [[Definition:Intermediate Field|intermediate field]]. Then $L / E$ is [[Definition:Galois Extension|Galois]].
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Galois Theory]] s3zuqy3xgnauel2aduazzo1ksnwjq25
Galois Extension is Galois over Intermediate Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Galois_Extension_is_Galois_over_Intermediate_Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Galois_Extension_is_Galois_over_Intermediate_Field
[ "Galois Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Galois Extension", "Definition:Intermediate Field", "Definition:Galois Extension" ]
[ "Category:Galois Theory" ]
proofwiki-12828
Frobenius Endomorphism on Field is Injective
Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $F$ be a field of characteristic $p$. Then the Frobenius endomorphism $\Frob: F \to F$ is injective.
We have: :$\map \Frob 1 = 1$ By Ring Homomorphism from Field is Monomorphism or Zero Homomorphism, $\Frob$ is injective. {{qed}}
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Let $F$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] of [[Definition:Characteristic of Field|characteristic]] $p$. Then the [[Definition:Frobenius Endomorphism|Frobenius endomorphism]] $\Frob: F \to F$ is [[Definition:Injection|injective]].
We have: :$\map \Frob 1 = 1$ By [[Ring Homomorphism from Field is Monomorphism or Zero Homomorphism]], $\Frob$ is [[Definition:Injection|injective]]. {{qed}}
Frobenius Endomorphism on Field is Injective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frobenius_Endomorphism_on_Field_is_Injective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frobenius_Endomorphism_on_Field_is_Injective
[ "Frobenius Endomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Characteristic of Field", "Definition:Frobenius Endomorphism", "Definition:Injection" ]
[ "Ring Homomorphism from Field is Monomorphism or Zero Homomorphism", "Definition:Injection" ]
proofwiki-12829
Galois Field is Perfect
Let $\GF$ be a Galois field. Then $\GF$ is perfect.
By Characteristic of Galois Field is Prime, $\Char \GF$ is a prime number, say $p$. By Frobenius Endomorphism on Field is Injective, $\Frob$ is injective. By Injection from Finite Set to Itself is Surjection, $\Frob$ is bijective. By Bijective Ring Homomorphism is Isomorphism, $\Frob$ is an automorphism. {{qed}} Catego...
Let $\GF$ be a [[Definition:Galois Field|Galois field]]. Then $\GF$ is [[Definition:Perfect Field|perfect]].
By [[Characteristic of Galois Field is Prime]], $\Char \GF$ is a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]], say $p$. By [[Frobenius Endomorphism on Field is Injective]], $\Frob$ is [[Definition:Injection|injective]]. By [[Injection from Finite Set to Itself is Surjection]], $\Frob$ is [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]...
Galois Field is Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Galois_Field_is_Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Galois_Field_is_Perfect
[ "Galois Fields", "Perfect Fields" ]
[ "Definition:Galois Field", "Definition:Perfect Field" ]
[ "Characteristic of Galois Field is Prime", "Definition:Prime Number", "Frobenius Endomorphism on Field is Injective", "Definition:Injection", "Injection from Finite Set to Itself is Surjection", "Definition:Bijection", "Bijective Ring Homomorphism is Isomorphism", "Definition:Field Automorphism", "C...
proofwiki-12830
Algebraically Closed Field is Perfect
Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. Then $F$ is perfect.
Let $E / F$ be any algebraic extension. Since $F$ is an algebraically closed field, $E = F$. By Field is Separable over itself, $E$ is separable over $F$. Hence $F$ is perfect. {{qed}} Category:Field Extensions Category:Perfect Fields oe9rzy5e66rnq45gbo0dhdf23qfa3hz
Let $F$ be an [[Definition:Algebraically Closed Field|algebraically closed field]]. Then $F$ is [[Definition:Perfect Field|perfect]].
Let $E / F$ be any [[Definition:Algebraic Extension|algebraic extension]]. Since $F$ is an [[Definition:Algebraically Closed Field|algebraically closed field]], $E = F$. By [[Field is Separable over itself]], $E$ is [[Definition:Separable Extension|separable]] over $F$. Hence $F$ is [[Definition:Perfect Field|perfec...
Algebraically Closed Field is Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebraically_Closed_Field_is_Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Algebraically_Closed_Field_is_Perfect
[ "Field Extensions", "Perfect Fields" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraically Closed Field", "Definition:Perfect Field" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Extension", "Definition:Algebraically Closed Field", "Field is Separable over itself", "Definition:Separable Extension", "Definition:Perfect Field", "Category:Field Extensions", "Category:Perfect Fields" ]
proofwiki-12831
Area of Smallest Rectangle accommodating Re-Entrant Knight's Tour
The area of the smallest rectangular chessboard on which a re-entrant knight's tour is possible is $30$ squares. This can be configured either as a $5 \times 6$ chessboard or a $3 \times 10$ chessboard.
{{ProofWanted|Haven't even started the definitions yet for chess problems}}
The [[Definition:Area|area]] of the smallest [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangular]] [[Definition:Chessboard|chessboard]] on which a [[Definition:Re-Entrant Knight's Tour|re-entrant knight's tour]] is possible is $30$ squares. This can be configured either as a $5 \times 6$ [[Definition:Chessboard|chessboard]] or a $3 \...
{{ProofWanted|Haven't even started the definitions yet for chess problems}}
Area of Smallest Rectangle accommodating Re-Entrant Knight's Tour
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Smallest_Rectangle_accommodating_Re-Entrant_Knight's_Tour
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Smallest_Rectangle_accommodating_Re-Entrant_Knight's_Tour
[ "30", "Knight's Tours" ]
[ "Definition:Area", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:Chess/Chessboard", "Definition:Re-Entrant Knight's Tour", "Definition:Chess/Chessboard", "Definition:Chess/Chessboard" ]
[]
proofwiki-12832
Area of Smallest Square accommodating Re-Entrant Knight's Tour
The area of the smallest square chessboard on which a re-entrant knight's tour is possible is $6 \times 6 = 36$ squares.
{{ProofWanted|Haven't even started the definitions yet for chess problems}}
The [[Definition:Area|area]] of the smallest [[Definition:Square (Geometry)|square]] [[Definition:Chessboard|chessboard]] on which a [[Definition:Re-Entrant Knight's Tour|re-entrant knight's tour]] is possible is $6 \times 6 = 36$ squares.
{{ProofWanted|Haven't even started the definitions yet for chess problems}}
Area of Smallest Square accommodating Re-Entrant Knight's Tour
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Smallest_Square_accommodating_Re-Entrant_Knight's_Tour
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Smallest_Square_accommodating_Re-Entrant_Knight's_Tour
[ "Recreational Mathematics", "6", "36", "Knight's Tours" ]
[ "Definition:Area", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Square", "Definition:Chess/Chessboard", "Definition:Re-Entrant Knight's Tour" ]
[]
proofwiki-12833
Subgroup of Index Least Prime Divisor is Normal
Let $G$ be a finite group of order $n>1$. Let $p$ be the least prime divisor of $n$. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ such that: :$\index G H = p$ where $\index G H$ denotes the index of $H$ in $G$. Then $H$ is normal.
Let $G / H$ denote the left coset space of $G$ modulo $H$. Consider the group action $G \curvearrowright G / H$, defined as: :$\forall g \in G, \forall x H \in G / H: g * \paren {x H} := \paren {g x} H$ {{explain|Expand group action as defined on {{ProofWiki}} to explain the notation $G \curvearrowright G / H$}} Let $\...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Finite Group|finite group]] of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $n>1$. Let $p$ be the least [[Definition:Prime Divisor|prime divisor]] of $n$. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$ such that: :$\index G H = p$ where $\index G H$ denotes the [[Definition:Index of Subgroup|in...
Let $G / H$ denote the [[Definition:Left Coset Space|left coset space of $G$ modulo $H$]]. Consider the [[Definition:Group Action on Coset Space|group action]] $G \curvearrowright G / H$, defined as: :$\forall g \in G, \forall x H \in G / H: g * \paren {x H} := \paren {g x} H$ {{explain|Expand [[Definition:Group Acti...
Subgroup of Index Least Prime Divisor is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Index_Least_Prime_Divisor_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Index_Least_Prime_Divisor_is_Normal
[ "Finite Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Prime Factor", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Index of Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Definition:Coset Space/Left Coset Space", "Definition:Group Action on Coset Space", "Definition:Group Action", "Definition:Kernel of Group Action", "Definition:Kernel of Group Action", "Kernel of Group Action is Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Stabilizer of Coset Action on Set of Sub...
proofwiki-12834
Alternating Group is Simple except on 4 Letters
Let $n$ be an integer such that $n \ne 4$. Then the $n$th alternating group $A_n$ is simple.
Recall that a group is simple if its normal subgroups are itself and the trivial subgroup. Let $n < 4$. $A_2$ is the trivial group and hence simple. $A_3$ is the cyclic group of order $3$, hence a prime group. By Prime Group is Simple, $A_3$ is simple. {{qed|lemma}} We note that $A_4$ is a special case. From Normality ...
Let $n$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] such that $n \ne 4$. Then the $n$th [[Definition:Alternating Group|alternating group]] $A_n$ is [[Definition:Simple Group|simple]].
Recall that a [[Definition:Group|group]] is [[Definition:Simple Group|simple]] if its [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroups]] are itself and the [[Definition:Trivial Subgroup|trivial subgroup]]. Let $n < 4$. $A_2$ is the [[Definition:Trivial Group|trivial group]] and hence [[Definition:Simple Group|simple]]. ...
Alternating Group is Simple except on 4 Letters
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Alternating_Group_is_Simple_except_on_4_Letters
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Alternating_Group_is_Simple_except_on_4_Letters
[ "Alternating Group is Simple except on 4 Letters", "Alternating Groups", "Simple Groups", "4" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Alternating Group", "Definition:Simple Group" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Simple Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Trivial Subgroup", "Definition:Trivial Group", "Definition:Simple Group", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Prime Group", "Prime Group is Simple", "Definition:Simple Gro...
proofwiki-12835
Universal Property of Quotient Ring
Let $R, S$ be commutative rings. Let $I \trianglelefteq R$ be an ideal of $R$. Let $\pi : R \to R / I$ be the quotient epimorphism. Let $f: R \to S$ be a ring homomorphism with $\map f I = \set 0$. Then there exists a unique ring homomorphism $\overline f: R / I \to S$ such that $f = \overline f \circ \pi$. :<nowiki>$\...
{{MissingLinks|justification for the statements and steps made in the chain of reasoning}} Define $\overline f: R / I \to S$ by: :$\forall r \in R: \map {\overline f} {r + I} = \map f r$ Since $f$ is a ring homomorphism, $f$ is well-defined. Suppose for some $r_1, r_2 \in R$ that: :$r_1 + I = r_2 + I$ Since $I$ is an...
Let $R, S$ be [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative rings]]. Let $I \trianglelefteq R$ be an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $R$. Let $\pi : R \to R / I$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Epimorphism|quotient epimorphism]]. Let $f: R \to S$ be a [[Definition:Ring Homomorphism|ring homomorphism]] with $\map f I ...
{{MissingLinks|justification for the statements and steps made in the chain of reasoning}} Define $\overline f: R / I \to S$ by: :$\forall r \in R: \map {\overline f} {r + I} = \map f r$ Since $f$ is a [[Definition:Ring Homomorphism|ring homomorphism]], $f$ is [[Definition:Well-Defined|well-defined]]. Suppose for ...
Universal Property of Quotient Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Quotient_Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Quotient_Ring
[ "Quotient Rings", "Universal Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Quotient Epimorphism", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Well-Defined", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Well-Defined", "Quotient Ring is Ring/Quotient Ring Addition is Well-Defined", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition...
proofwiki-12836
Universal Property of Quotient Space
Let $X$ and $Y$ be topological spaces. Let $\sim$ be an equivalence relation on $X$. Let $\pi : X \to X / {\sim}$ be the quotient mapping. Let $f : X \to Y$ be continuous and $\sim$-invariant. Then there exists a unique continuous map $\overline f : X / {\sim} \to Y$ such that $f = \overline f \circ \pi$.
{{proofread}}
Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $\sim$ be an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on $X$. Let $\pi : X \to X / {\sim}$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Mapping|quotient mapping]]. Let $f : X \to Y$ be [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]] ...
{{proofread}}
Universal Property of Quotient Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Quotient_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Quotient_Space
[ "Quotient Spaces (Topology)", "Universal Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Quotient Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Invariant Mapping Under Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[]
proofwiki-12837
Universal Property of Quotient Group
Let $G$ and $H$ be groups. Let $N \trianglelefteq G$ be an normal subgroup. Let $\pi: G \to G / N$ be the quotient epimorphism. Let $f: G \to H$ be a group homomorphism with $N \subseteq \ker f$. Then there exists a unique group homomorphism $\overline f: G / N \to H$ such that $f = \overline f \circ \pi$. $\xymatrix{ ...
=== Existence === {{proofread}} Let $\sim$ denote (left) congruence modulo $N$. From Congruence Modulo Subgroup is Equivalence Relation, $\sim$ is an equivalence relation on $X$. For all $g \in G$, let $\eqclass g \sim$ denote the equivalence class of $g$ under $\sim$. Note that Group Homomorphism is Invariant under Co...
Let $G$ and $H$ be [[Definition:Group|groups]]. Let $N \trianglelefteq G$ be an [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]]. Let $\pi: G \to G / N$ be the [[Definition:Quotient Epimorphism|quotient epimorphism]]. Let $f: G \to H$ be a [[Definition:Group Homomorphism|group homomorphism]] with $N \subseteq \ker f$....
=== Existence === {{proofread}} Let $\sim$ denote [[Definition:Left Congruence Modulo Subgroup|(left) congruence modulo $N$]]. From [[Congruence Modulo Subgroup is Equivalence Relation]], $\sim$ is an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on $X$. For all $g \in G$, let $\eqclass g \sim$ denote th...
Universal Property of Quotient Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Quotient_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Universal_Property_of_Quotient_Group
[ "Quotient Groups", "Universal Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Quotient Epimorphism", "Definition:Group Homomorphism", "Definition:Group Homomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Congruence Modulo Subgroup/Left Congruence", "Congruence Modulo Subgroup is Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Class", "Group Homomorphism is Invariant under Congruence Modulo Kernel", "Definition:Invariant Mapping Under Equivalence Relation", "...
proofwiki-12838
Arithmetic Sequence of 4 Terms with 3 Distinct Prime Factors
The arithmetic sequence: :$30, 66, 102, 138$ is the smallest of $4$ terms which consists entirely of positive integers each with $3$ distinct prime factors.
We demonstrate that this is indeed an arithmetic sequence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 66 - 30 | r = 36 }} {{eqn | l = 102 - 66 | r = 36 }} {{eqn | l = 138 - 102 | r = 36 }} {{end-eqn}} demonstrating the common difference of $36$. Then we note: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 30 | r = 2 \times 3 \times ...
The [[Definition:Arithmetic Sequence|arithmetic sequence]]: :$30, 66, 102, 138$ is the smallest of $4$ terms which consists entirely of [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] each with $3$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Factor|prime factors]].
We demonstrate that this is indeed an [[Definition:Arithmetic Sequence|arithmetic sequence]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 66 - 30 | r = 36 }} {{eqn | l = 102 - 66 | r = 36 }} {{eqn | l = 138 - 102 | r = 36 }} {{end-eqn}} demonstrating the [[Definition:Common Difference|common difference]] of $36$. T...
Arithmetic Sequence of 4 Terms with 3 Distinct Prime Factors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Arithmetic_Sequence_of_4_Terms_with_3_Distinct_Prime_Factors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Arithmetic_Sequence_of_4_Terms_with_3_Distinct_Prime_Factors
[ "Arithmetic Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Factor" ]
[ "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence", "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence/Common Difference", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Length of Sequence", "Definition:Term of Sequence", "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Integer Se...
proofwiki-12839
Sum of Successive Powers in 2 ways
$31$ and $8191$ can be expressed as the sum of successive powers starting from $1$ in in $2$ different ways.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 31 | r = 1 + 5 + 5^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 8191 | r = 1 + 90 + 90^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 + 2^5 + 2^6 + 2^7 + 2^8 + 2^9 + 2^{10}+ 2^{11}+ 2^{12} | c = }} {{end-e...
$31$ and $8191$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of successive [[Definition:Integer Power|powers]] starting from $1$ in in $2$ different ways.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 31 | r = 1 + 5 + 5^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 8191 | r = 1 + 90 + 90^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 + 2^5 + 2^6 + 2^7 + 2^8 + 2^9 + 2^{10}+ 2^{11}+ 2^{12} | c = }} {{end...
Sum of Successive Powers in 2 ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Successive_Powers_in_2_ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Successive_Powers_in_2_ways
[ "Sums of Sequences", "Powers", "31", "8191" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-12840
31 is Smallest Prime whose Reciprocal has Odd Period
$31$ is the smallest prime number to have a decimal expansion of the reciprocal with an odd period greater than $1$: :$\dfrac 1 {31} = 0 \cdotp \dot 03225 \, 80645 \, 1612 \dot 9$
From Reciprocal of $31$: {{:Reciprocal of 31}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a period of recurrence of $15$, an odd integer. The prime numbers less than $31$ are $2$, $3$, $5$, $7$, $11$, $13$, $17$, $19$, $23$, $29$. We investigate the reciprocal of each of these: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac 1 2 ...
$31$ is the smallest [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] to have a [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] with an [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]] [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period]] greater than $1$: :$\dfrac 1 {31} = 0 \cdotp \dot 03225 \, 80645 \, 16...
From [[Reciprocal of 31|Reciprocal of $31$]]: {{:Reciprocal of 31}} Counting the digits, it is seen that this has a [[Definition:Period of Recurrence|period of recurrence]] of $15$, an [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]]. The [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]] less than $31$ are $2$, $3$, $5$, $7$, $11$, $1...
31 is Smallest Prime whose Reciprocal has Odd Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/31_is_Smallest_Prime_whose_Reciprocal_has_Odd_Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/31_is_Smallest_Prime_whose_Reciprocal_has_Odd_Period
[ "31", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 31", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Reciprocal of 2", "Reciprocal of 3", "Definition:Basis Expansion/Recurrence/Period", "Reciprocal of 5", "Reciprocal of 7", "Definition:Basis Expansio...
proofwiki-12841
Properties of Periodic Part of Reciprocal of 31
We have from Reciprocal of $31$ that the decimal expansion of the reciprocal of $31$ is: {{:Reciprocal of 31}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 032258 \times 2 | r = 64 \, 516 }} {{eqn | l = 032258 \times 4 | r = 129 \, 032 }} {{eqn | l = 032258 \times 5 | r = 161 \, 290 }} {{eqn | l = 032258 \times 7 ...
Verified by calculation.
We have from [[Reciprocal of 31|Reciprocal of $31$]] that the [[Definition:Decimal Expansion|decimal expansion]] of the [[Definition:Reciprocal|reciprocal]] of $31$ is: {{:Reciprocal of 31}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 032258 \times 2 | r = 64 \, 516 }} {{eqn | l = 032258 \times 4 | r = 129 \, 032 }} {...
Verified by calculation.
Properties of Periodic Part of Reciprocal of 31
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Properties_of_Periodic_Part_of_Reciprocal_of_31
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Properties_of_Periodic_Part_of_Reciprocal_of_31
[ "31", "Examples of Reciprocals" ]
[ "Reciprocal of 31", "Definition:Decimal Expansion", "Definition:Reciprocal" ]
[]
proofwiki-12842
Smallest Adjacent Happy Numbers
The smallest adjacent happy numbers are $31$ and $32$.
This can be determined by testing all the positive integers in succession for happiness. Checking $31$ and $32$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 31 | o = \to | r = 3^2 + 1^2 = 9 + 1 = 10 | c = }} {{eqn | o = \to | r = 1^2 = 1 | c = and so $31$ is happy. }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = ...
The smallest adjacent [[Definition:Happy Number|happy numbers]] are $31$ and $32$.
This can be determined by testing all the [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] in succession for [[Definition:Happy Number|happiness]]. Checking $31$ and $32$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 31 | o = \to | r = 3^2 + 1^2 = 9 + 1 = 10 | c = }} {{eqn | o = \to | r = 1^2 = 1 | c = ...
Smallest Adjacent Happy Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Adjacent_Happy_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Adjacent_Happy_Numbers
[ "Happy Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Happy Number" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Happy Number", "Definition:Happy Number", "Definition:Happy Number" ]
proofwiki-12843
Increasing Mapping Preserves Lower Bounds
Let $L = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$, $L' = \left({S', \preceq'}\right)$ be ordered sets. Let $f:S \to S'$ be an increasing mapping. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$ such that :$x$ is lower bound for $X$. Then $f \left({x}\right)$ is lower bound for $f \left[{X}\right]$.
Let $y \in f\left[{X}\right]$. By definition of image of set: :$\exists z \in X: y = f \left({z}\right)$ By definition of lower bound: :$x \preceq z$ Thus by definition of increasing mapping: :$f \left({x}\right) \preceq' y$ {{qed}}
Let $L = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$, $L' = \left({S', \preceq'}\right)$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $f:S \to S'$ be an [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]]. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$ such that :$x$ is [[Definition:Lower Bound of Set|lower bound]] for $X$. Then $f \left({x}\r...
Let $y \in f\left[{X}\right]$. By definition of [[Definition:Image of Subset under Mapping|image of set]]: :$\exists z \in X: y = f \left({z}\right)$ By definition of [[Definition:Lower Bound of Set|lower bound]]: :$x \preceq z$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]]: :$f \left({x...
Increasing Mapping Preserves Lower Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Mapping_Preserves_Lower_Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Mapping_Preserves_Lower_Bounds
[ "Increasing Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping" ]
proofwiki-12844
Order Isomorphism Preserves Lower Bounds
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$, $L' = \struct {S', \preceq'}$ be ordered sets. Let $f: S \to S'$ be an order isomorphism between $L$ and $L'$. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$. Then $x$ is lower bound for $X$ {{iff}} $\map f x$ is lower bound for $f \sqbrk X$.
By definition of order isomorphism: :$f$ is an order embedding.
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$, $L' = \struct {S', \preceq'}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $f: S \to S'$ be an [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]] between $L$ and $L'$. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$. Then $x$ is [[Definition:Lower Bound of Set|lower bound]] for $X$ {{iff}} $\map f...
By definition of [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]]: :$f$ is an [[Definition:Order Embedding|order embedding]].
Order Isomorphism Preserves Lower Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Isomorphism_Preserves_Lower_Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Isomorphism_Preserves_Lower_Bounds
[ "Order Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Order Embedding", "Definition:Order Embedding" ]
proofwiki-12845
Order Embedding is Increasing Mapping
Let $\left({S_1, \preceq_1}\right)$, $\left({S_2, \preceq_2}\right)$ be ordered sets. Let $f:S_1 \to S_2$ be an order embedding. Then $f$ is increasing mapping.
By definition of order embedding: :$\forall x, y \in S_1: x \preceq_1 y \implies f\left({x}\right) \preceq_2 f\left({y}\right)$ Hence $f$ is an increasing mapping. {{qed}} Category:Order Embeddings Category:Increasing Mappings 2dys8l0sul24o8x0jrg12yha84gkk4f
Let $\left({S_1, \preceq_1}\right)$, $\left({S_2, \preceq_2}\right)$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $f:S_1 \to S_2$ be an [[Definition:Order Embedding|order embedding]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]].
By definition of [[Definition:Order Embedding|order embedding]]: :$\forall x, y \in S_1: x \preceq_1 y \implies f\left({x}\right) \preceq_2 f\left({y}\right)$ Hence $f$ is an [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Order Embeddings]] [[Category:Increasing Mappings]] 2dys8l0sul24o8x0jr...
Order Embedding is Increasing Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Embedding_is_Increasing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Embedding_is_Increasing_Mapping
[ "Order Embeddings", "Increasing Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Order Embedding", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Order Embedding", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Category:Order Embeddings", "Category:Increasing Mappings" ]
proofwiki-12846
Order Isomorphism Preserves Upper Bounds
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$, $L' = \struct {S', \preceq'}$ be ordered sets. Let $f: S \to S'$ be an order isomorphism between $L$ and $L'$. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$. Then: :$x$ is an upper bound for $X$ {{iff}}: :$\map f x$ is an upper bound for $f \sqbrk X$.
By definition of order isomorphism: :$f$ is an order embedding.
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$, $L' = \struct {S', \preceq'}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $f: S \to S'$ be an [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]] between $L$ and $L'$. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$. Then: :$x$ is an [[Definition:Upper Bound of Set|upper bound]] for $X$ {{iff}}: :...
By definition of [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]]: :$f$ is an [[Definition:Order Embedding|order embedding]].
Order Isomorphism Preserves Upper Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Isomorphism_Preserves_Upper_Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Isomorphism_Preserves_Upper_Bounds
[ "Order Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Order Embedding", "Definition:Order Embedding" ]
proofwiki-12847
Increasing Mapping Preserves Upper Bounds
Let $L = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$, $L' = \left({S', \preceq'}\right)$ be ordered sets. Let $f:S \to S'$ be an increasing mapping. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$ such that :$x$ is upper bound for $X$. Then $f\left({x}\right)$ is upper bound for $f\left[{X}\right]$.
Let $y \in f\left[{X}\right]$. By definition of image of set: :$\exists z \in X: y = f\left({z}\right)$ By definition of upper bound: :$z \preceq x$ Thus by definition of increasing mapping: :$y \preceq' f\left({x}\right)$ {{qed}}
Let $L = \left({S, \preceq}\right)$, $L' = \left({S', \preceq'}\right)$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $f:S \to S'$ be an [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]]. Let $x \in S$, $X \subseteq S$ such that :$x$ is [[Definition:Upper Bound of Set|upper bound]] for $X$. Then $f\left({x}\ri...
Let $y \in f\left[{X}\right]$. By definition of [[Definition:Image of Subset under Mapping|image of set]]: :$\exists z \in X: y = f\left({z}\right)$ By definition of [[Definition:Upper Bound of Set|upper bound]]: :$z \preceq x$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Increasing Mapping|increasing mapping]]: :$y \preceq' ...
Increasing Mapping Preserves Upper Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Mapping_Preserves_Upper_Bounds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Mapping_Preserves_Upper_Bounds
[ "Increasing Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Increasing/Mapping" ]
proofwiki-12848
Order Isomorphism Preserves Infima and Suprema
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ and $L' = \struct {S', \preceq'}$ be ordered sets. Let $f: S \to S'$ be an order isomorphism between $L$ and $L'$. Then $f$ preserves infima and suprema.
=== $f$ preserves infima === Let $X$ be a subset of $S$ such that :$X$ admits an infimum in $L$. By definition of infimum: :$\inf X$ is lower bound for $X$. Thus by Order Isomorphism Preserves Lower Bounds: :$\map f {\inf X}$ is lower bound for $f \sqbrk X$. We will prove that :$\forall x \in S': x$ is lower bound for ...
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ and $L' = \struct {S', \preceq'}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $f: S \to S'$ be an [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]] between $L$ and $L'$. Then $f$ [[Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All|preserves infima]] and [[Definition:Mapping Preserves Supre...
=== $f$ [[Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All|preserves infima]] === Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$ such that :$X$ admits an [[Definition:Infimum of Set|infimum]] in $L$. By definition of [[Definition:Infimum of Set|infimum]]: :$\inf X$ is [[Definition:Lower Bound of Set|lower bound]] for $X$. ...
Order Isomorphism Preserves Infima and Suprema
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Isomorphism_Preserves_Infima_and_Suprema
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_Isomorphism_Preserves_Infima_and_Suprema
[ "Order Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/All" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Order Isomorphism Preserves Lower Bounds", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", "Definition:Lower Bound of Set", ...
proofwiki-12849
Moser's Circle Problem
Let $n$ points be marked on the circumference of a circle $C$. Let chords be drawn between each pair of these points. For each $n$, the maximum number $\map C n$ of regions into which $C$ can be divided is as follows: :{| border="1" |- ! align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $n$ ! align="right" style = "padding:...
:300px $\quad$ 300px $\quad$ 300px :300px $\quad$ 300px $\quad$ 300px {{proof wanted}} {{Namedfor|Leo Moser|cat = Moser}}
Let $n$ [[Definition:Point|points]] be marked on the [[Definition:Circumference of Circle|circumference]] of a [[Definition:Circle|circle]] $C$. Let [[Definition:Chord of Circle|chords]] be drawn between each pair of these [[Definition:Point|points]]. For each $n$, the maximum number $\map C n$ of [[Definition:Region...
:[[File:CircleDividedByChord1.png|300px]] $\quad$ [[File:CircleDividedByChord2.png|300px]] $\quad$ [[File:CircleDividedByChords3.png|300px]] :[[File:CircleDividedByChords4.png|300px]] $\quad$ [[File:CircleDividedByChords5.png|300px]] $\quad$ [[File:CircleDividedByChords6.png|300px]] {{proof wanted}} {{Namedfor|Leo M...
Moser's Circle Problem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moser's_Circle_Problem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moser's_Circle_Problem
[ "Moser's Circle Problem", "Chords of Circles", "Circles" ]
[ "Definition:Point", "Definition:Circle/Circumference", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Chord", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Region/Plane" ]
[ "File:CircleDividedByChord1.png", "File:CircleDividedByChord2.png", "File:CircleDividedByChords3.png", "File:CircleDividedByChords4.png", "File:CircleDividedByChords5.png", "File:CircleDividedByChords6.png" ]
proofwiki-12850
Prime Factors of 2^64 - 1
The prime decomposition of $2^{64} - 1$ is given by: :$2^{64} - 1 = 3 \times 5 \times 17 \times 257 \times 641 \times 65 \, 537 \times 6 \, 700 \, 417$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2^{64} - 1 | r = \paren {2^{32} }^2 - 1 | c = Power of Power }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2^{32} + 1} \paren {2^{32} - 1} | c = Difference of Two Squares }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2^{32} + 1} \paren {\paren {2^{16} }^2 - 1} | c = Power of Power }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2^{32} + 1}...
The [[Definition:Prime Decomposition|prime decomposition]] of $2^{64} - 1$ is given by: :$2^{64} - 1 = 3 \times 5 \times 17 \times 257 \times 641 \times 65 \, 537 \times 6 \, 700 \, 417$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2^{64} - 1 | r = \paren {2^{32} }^2 - 1 | c = [[Power of Power]] }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2^{32} + 1} \paren {2^{32} - 1} | c = [[Difference of Two Squares]] }} {{eqn | r = \paren {2^{32} + 1} \paren {\paren {2^{16} }^2 - 1} | c = [[Power of Power]] }} {{eqn | r = \paren ...
Prime Factors of 2^64 - 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Factors_of_2^64_-_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Factors_of_2^64_-_1
[ "18,446,744,073,709,551,615" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Decomposition" ]
[ "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Difference of Two Squares", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Difference of Two Squares", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Difference of Two Squares", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Difference of Two Squares", "Exponen...
proofwiki-12851
Prime Decomposition of 5th Fermat Number
The prime decomposition of the $5$th Fermat number is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2^{\paren {2^5} } + 1 | r = 4 \, 294 \, 967 \, 297 | c = Sequence of Fermat Numbers }} {{eqn | r = 641 \times 6 \, 700 \, 417 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {5 \times 2^7 + 1} \times \paren {3 \times 17449 \times 2...
From Divisor of Fermat Number, if $2^{\paren {2^n} } + 1$ has a divisor, it will be in the form: :$k \, 2^{n + 2} + 1$ In the case of $n = 5$, a divisor of $2^{\paren {2^n} } + 1$ is then of the form: :$k \, 2^7 + 1 = k \times 128 + 1$ Further, such a number will (for small $k$ at least) be prime, otherwise it will its...
The [[Definition:Prime Decomposition|prime decomposition]] of the $5$th [[Definition:Fermat Number|Fermat number]] is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2^{\paren {2^5} } + 1 | r = 4 \, 294 \, 967 \, 297 | c = [[Definition:Fermat Number/Sequence|Sequence of Fermat Numbers]] }} {{eqn | r = 641 \times 6 \, ...
From [[Divisor of Fermat Number]], if $2^{\paren {2^n} } + 1$ has a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisor]], it will be in the form: :$k \, 2^{n + 2} + 1$ In the case of $n = 5$, a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisor]] of $2^{\paren {2^n} } + 1$ is then of the form: :$k \, 2^7 + 1 = k \times 128 + 1$ Further, s...
Prime Decomposition of 5th Fermat Number/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Decomposition_of_5th_Fermat_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Decomposition_of_5th_Fermat_Number/Proof_1
[ "4,294,967,297", "641", "6,700,417", "Fermat Numbers", "Prime Decomposition of 5th Fermat Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Decomposition", "Definition:Fermat Number", "Definition:Fermat Number/Sequence" ]
[ "Divisor of Fermat Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Pri...
proofwiki-12852
Prime Decomposition of 5th Fermat Number
The prime decomposition of the $5$th Fermat number is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2^{\paren {2^5} } + 1 | r = 4 \, 294 \, 967 \, 297 | c = Sequence of Fermat Numbers }} {{eqn | r = 641 \times 6 \, 700 \, 417 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {5 \times 2^7 + 1} \times \paren {3 \times 17449 \times 2...
Note the remarkable coincidence that $2^4 + 5^4 = 2^7 \cdot 5 + 1 = 641$. First we eliminate $y$ from $x^4 + y^4 = x^7 y + 1 = 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^4 + y^4 | r = x^7 y + 1 = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -x^4 | r = y^4 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x^{28} \...
The [[Definition:Prime Decomposition|prime decomposition]] of the $5$th [[Definition:Fermat Number|Fermat number]] is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2^{\paren {2^5} } + 1 | r = 4 \, 294 \, 967 \, 297 | c = [[Definition:Fermat Number/Sequence|Sequence of Fermat Numbers]] }} {{eqn | r = 641 \times 6 \, ...
Note the remarkable coincidence that $2^4 + 5^4 = 2^7 \cdot 5 + 1 = 641$. First we eliminate $y$ from $x^4 + y^4 = x^7 y + 1 = 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^4 + y^4 | r = x^7 y + 1 = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -x^4 | r = y^4 | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x^{28...
Prime Decomposition of 5th Fermat Number/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Decomposition_of_5th_Fermat_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Decomposition_of_5th_Fermat_Number/Proof_2
[ "4,294,967,297", "641", "6,700,417", "Fermat Numbers", "Prime Decomposition of 5th Fermat Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Decomposition", "Definition:Fermat Number", "Definition:Fermat Number/Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-12853
Mapping Assigning to Element Its Compact Closure Preserves Infima and Directed Suprema
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a bounded below algebraic lattice. Let $C = \struct {\map K L, \preceq'}$ be an ordered subset of $L$ where $\map K L$ denotes the compact subset of $L$. Let $P = \struct {\powerset {\map K L}, \precsim}$ be an inclusion ordered set of power set of $\map K L$. Then there ...
By definitions of compact subset, compact closure, and subset: :$\forall x \in S: x^{\mathrm{compact} } \subseteq \map K L$ By definition of power set: :$\forall x \in S: x^{\mathrm{compact} } \in \powerset {\map K L}$ Define a mapping $f:S \to \powerset {\map K L}$ such that: :$\forall x \in S: \map f x = x^{\mathrm{c...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below Set|bounded below]] [[Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set|algebraic]] [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattice]]. Let $C = \struct {\map K L, \preceq'}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Subset|ordered subset]] of $L$ where $\map K L$ denotes the [...
By definitions of [[Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice|compact subset]], [[Definition:Compact Closure|compact closure]], and [[Definition:Subset|subset]]: :$\forall x \in S: x^{\mathrm{compact} } \subseteq \map K L$ By definition of [[Definition:Power Set|power set]]: :$\forall x \in S: x^{\mathrm{compact} } \in \po...
Mapping Assigning to Element Its Compact Closure Preserves Infima and Directed Suprema
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_Assigning_to_Element_Its_Compact_Closure_Preserves_Infima_and_Directed_Suprema
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_Assigning_to_Element_Its_Compact_Closure_Preserves_Infima_and_Directed_Suprema
[ "Continuous Lattices", "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set", "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Inclusion Ordered Set", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All", "Definition:Mapping Pr...
[ "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Compact Closure", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Compact Closure is Directed", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Lower Section", "Definition...
proofwiki-12854
Power of 2 is Difference between Two Powers
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a power of $2$. Then $n$ is the difference between powers of two positive integers greater than or equal to $2$. {{questionable|This is so trivial I wonder whether something got lost in translation.}}
$2^k = 2^{k+1} - 2^k$ {{qed}}
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Integer Power|power]] of $2$. Then $n$ is the [[Definition:Integer Subtraction|difference]] between [[Definition:Integer Power|powers]] of two [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] greater than or equal to $2$. {{questionable|This is so trivial I wonder whether somet...
$2^k = 2^{k+1} - 2^k$ {{qed}}
Power of 2 is Difference between Two Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_2_is_Difference_between_Two_Powers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_2_is_Difference_between_Two_Powers
[ "Power of 2 is Difference between Two Powers", "Powers of 2" ]
[ "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Subtraction/Integers", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-12855
Smallest Sequence of Three Consecutive Semiprimes
The smallest triple of consecutive semiprimes is: :$33, 34, 35$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 33 | r = 3 \times 11 }} {{eqn | l = 34 | r = 2 \times 17 }} {{eqn | l = 35 | r = 5 \times 7 }} {{end-eqn}} It can be seen from the sequence of semiprimes that there exist no smaller such triples. {{qed}}
The smallest [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triple]] of consecutive [[Definition:Semiprime Number|semiprimes]] is: :$33, 34, 35$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 33 | r = 3 \times 11 }} {{eqn | l = 34 | r = 2 \times 17 }} {{eqn | l = 35 | r = 5 \times 7 }} {{end-eqn}} It can be seen from the [[Definition:Semiprime Number/Sequence|sequence of semiprimes]] that there exist no smaller such [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triples]]...
Smallest Sequence of Three Consecutive Semiprimes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Sequence_of_Three_Consecutive_Semiprimes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Sequence_of_Three_Consecutive_Semiprimes
[ "Semiprimes" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Semiprime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Semiprime Number/Sequence", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple" ]
proofwiki-12856
Integers not Sum of Distinct Triangular Numbers
The sequence of integers which cannot be expressed as the sum of distinct triangular numbers is: :$2, 5, 8, 12, 23, 33$ {{OEIS|A053614}}
It will be proved that the largest integer which cannot be expressed as the sum of distinct triangular numbers is $33$. The remaining integers in the sequence can be identified by inspection. We prove this using a variant of Second Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$n$ can be expr...
The [[Definition:Integer Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] which cannot be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of [[Definition:Distinct Elements|distinct]] [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular numbers]] is: :$2, 5, 8, 12, 23, 33$ {{OEIS|A053614}}
It will be proved that the largest [[Definition:Integer|integer]] which cannot be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of [[Definition:Distinct Elements|distinct]] [[Definition:Triangular Number|triangular numbers]] is $33$. The remaining [[Definition:Integer|integers]] in the [[Definition:Integer Sequ...
Integers not Sum of Distinct Triangular Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_not_Sum_of_Distinct_Triangular_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_not_Sum_of_Distinct_Triangular_Numbers
[ "Triangular Numbers", "33" ]
[ "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Distinct/Plural", "Definition:Triangular Number" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Distinct/Plural", "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Integer Sequence", "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Distinct/Plural", "Definition:Triangula...
proofwiki-12857
Powers of 2 and 5 without Zeroes
The following $n \in \Z$ are such that both $2^n$ and $5^n$ have no zeroes in their decimal representation: :$0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 18, 33$ {{OEIS|A007496}}
:{| border="1" |- ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $n$ ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $2^n$ ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $5^n$ |- | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $0$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $1$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 1...
The following $n \in \Z$ are such that both $2^n$ and $5^n$ have no [[Definition:Zero (Number)|zeroes]] in their [[Definition:Decimal Notation|decimal representation]]: :$0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 18, 33$ {{OEIS|A007496}}
:{| border="1" |- ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $n$ ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $2^n$ ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $5^n$ |- | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $0$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $1$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 1...
Powers of 2 and 5 without Zeroes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_2_and_5_without_Zeroes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_2_and_5_without_Zeroes
[ "Powers of 2", "Powers of 5" ]
[ "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Decimal Notation" ]
[]
proofwiki-12858
Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition
The vector cross product is distributive over addition. That is, in general: :$\mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + \mathbf c} = \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf b} + \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf c}$ for $\mathbf a, \mathbf b, \mathbf c \in \R^3$.
Let: :$\mathbf a = \begin {bmatrix} a_x \\ a_y \\a_z \end {bmatrix}$, $\mathbf b = \begin {bmatrix} b_x \\ b_y \\ b_z \end {bmatrix}$, $\mathbf c = \begin {bmatrix} c_x \\ c_y \\ c_z \end {bmatrix}$ be vectors in $\R^3$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + \mathbf c} | r = \begin ...
The [[Definition:Vector Cross Product|vector cross product]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Vector Sum|addition]]. That is, in general: :$\mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + \mathbf c} = \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf b} + \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf c}$ for $\mathbf ...
Let: :$\mathbf a = \begin {bmatrix} a_x \\ a_y \\a_z \end {bmatrix}$, $\mathbf b = \begin {bmatrix} b_x \\ b_y \\ b_z \end {bmatrix}$, $\mathbf c = \begin {bmatrix} c_x \\ c_y \\ c_z \end {bmatrix}$ be [[Definition:Space Vector|vectors in $\R^3$]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + ...
Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Cross_Product_Distributes_over_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Cross_Product_Distributes_over_Addition/Proof_1
[ "Vector Cross Product", "Vector Addition", "Examples of Distributive Operations", "Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Cross Product", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Vector Sum" ]
[ "Definition:Vector/Real Euclidean Space/Space Vector", "Real Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Real Addition is Commutative" ]
proofwiki-12859
Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition
The vector cross product is distributive over addition. That is, in general: :$\mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + \mathbf c} = \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf b} + \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf c}$ for $\mathbf a, \mathbf b, \mathbf c \in \R^3$.
We draw a triangular prism whose parallel edges are in the direction of $\mathbf a$ and with its end faces as triangles with sides $\mathbf b$, $\mathbf c$ and $\mathbf b + \mathbf c$. :600px From Magnitude of Vector Cross Product equals Area of Parallelogram Contained by Vectors, the vector areas of these triangular e...
The [[Definition:Vector Cross Product|vector cross product]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Vector Sum|addition]]. That is, in general: :$\mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + \mathbf c} = \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf b} + \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf c}$ for $\mathbf ...
We draw a [[Definition:Triangular Prism|triangular prism]] whose [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] [[Definition:Edge of Polyhedron|edges]] are in the direction of $\mathbf a$ and with its end [[Definition:Face of Polyhedron|faces]] as [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangles]] with [[Definition:Side of Polygon|s...
Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Cross_Product_Distributes_over_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Cross_Product_Distributes_over_Addition/Proof_2
[ "Vector Cross Product", "Vector Addition", "Examples of Distributive Operations", "Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Cross Product", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Vector Sum" ]
[ "Definition:Prism/Triangular", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Polyhedron/Edge", "Definition:Polyhedron/Face", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "File:Cross-product-distributes-over-addition.png", "Magnitude of Vector Cross Product equals Area of Parallel...
proofwiki-12860
Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition
The vector cross product is distributive over addition. That is, in general: :$\mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + \mathbf c} = \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf b} + \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf c}$ for $\mathbf a, \mathbf b, \mathbf c \in \R^3$.
Let $\mathbf b'$ and $\mathbf c'$ be the projections of $\mathbf b$ and $\mathbf c$ onto the plane perpendicular to $\mathbf a$. Then $\mathbf b' + \mathbf c'$ is the projection of $\mathbf b + \mathbf c$ onto that plane. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf a \times \mathbf b' | r = \mathbf a \times \mathb...
The [[Definition:Vector Cross Product|vector cross product]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Vector Sum|addition]]. That is, in general: :$\mathbf a \times \paren {\mathbf b + \mathbf c} = \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf b} + \paren {\mathbf a \times \mathbf c}$ for $\mathbf ...
Let $\mathbf b'$ and $\mathbf c'$ be the [[Definition:Vector Projection|projections]] of $\mathbf b$ and $\mathbf c$ onto the [[Definition:Plane|plane]] [[Definition:Line Perpendicular to Plane|perpendicular]] to $\mathbf a$. Then $\mathbf b' + \mathbf c'$ is the [[Definition:Vector Projection|projection]] of $\mathbf...
Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Cross_Product_Distributes_over_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vector_Cross_Product_Distributes_over_Addition/Proof_3
[ "Vector Cross Product", "Vector Addition", "Examples of Distributive Operations", "Vector Cross Product Distributes over Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Cross Product", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Vector Sum" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Projection", "Definition:Plane Surface", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular/Plane", "Definition:Vector Projection", "Definition:Plane Surface", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular", "Definition:Plane Surface", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular/Plane", "Definition:Vector L...
proofwiki-12861
Jacobi's Equation is Variational Equation of Euler's Equation
The Variational equation of Euler's equation is Jacobi's equation.
Let Euler's equation be :$\map {F_y} {x, \hat y, \hat y'} - \dfrac \d {\d x} \map {F_{y'} } {x, \hat y, \hat y'} = 0$ which is derived from: :$\ds \int_a^b \paren {\map {F_y} {x, \hat y, \hat y'} - \frac \d {\d x} \map {F_{y'} } {x, \hat y, \hat y'} } \rd x = 0$ Let $\map {\hat y} x = \map y x$ and $\map {\hat y} x = \...
The [[Definition:Variational Equation of Differential Equation|Variational equation]] of [[Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation|Euler's equation]] is [[Definition:Jacobi's Equation of Functional|Jacobi's equation]].
Let [[Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation|Euler's equation]] be :$\map {F_y} {x, \hat y, \hat y'} - \dfrac \d {\d x} \map {F_{y'} } {x, \hat y, \hat y'} = 0$ which is derived from: :$\ds \int_a^b \paren {\map {F_y} {x, \hat y, \hat y'} - \frac \d {\d x} \map {F_{y'} } {x, \hat y, \hat y'} } \rd x = 0...
Jacobi's Equation is Variational Equation of Euler's Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Jacobi's_Equation_is_Variational_Equation_of_Euler's_Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Jacobi's_Equation_is_Variational_Equation_of_Euler's_Equation
[ "Calculus of Variations" ]
[ "Definition:Variational Equation of Differential Equation", "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation", "Definition:Jacobi's Equation of Functional" ]
[ "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation", "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation", "Taylor's Theorem", "Definition:Ordered Tuple", "Definition:Variable", "Definition:Differential Equation/Solution", "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation", "Integration by Parts...
proofwiki-12862
Palindromes in Base 10 and Base 2
The following $n \in \Z$ are palindromic in both decimal and binary: :$0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 33, 99, 313, 585, 717, 7447, 9009, 15 \, 351, 32 \, 223, 39 \, 993, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A007632}}
:{| border="1" |- ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $n_{10}$ ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $n_2$ |- | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $0$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $0$ |- | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $1$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2...
The following $n \in \Z$ are [[Definition:Palindromic Number|palindromic]] in both [[Definition:Decimal Notation|decimal]] and [[Definition:Binary Notation|binary]]: :$0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 33, 99, 313, 585, 717, 7447, 9009, 15 \, 351, 32 \, 223, 39 \, 993, \ldots$ {{OEIS|A007632}}
:{| border="1" |- ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $n_{10}$ ! align="center" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $n_2$ |- | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $0$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $0$ |- | align="right" style = "padding: 2px 10px" | $1$ | align="right" style = "padding: 2...
Palindromes in Base 10 and Base 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Palindromes_in_Base_10_and_Base_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Palindromes_in_Base_10_and_Base_2
[ "Palindromic Numbers", "2", "10" ]
[ "Definition:Palindromic Number", "Definition:Decimal Notation", "Definition:Binary Notation" ]
[]
proofwiki-12863
Integer as Sum of 5 Non-Zero Squares
Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer such that $n > 33$. Then $n$ can be expressed as the sum of $5$ non-zero squares.
From Lagrange's Four Square Theorem, every positive integer can be expressed as the sum of $4$ squares, some of which may be zero. The existence of positive integers which cannot be expressed as the sum of $4$ non-zero squares is noted by the trivial examples $1$, $2$ and $3$. Thus Lagrange's Four Square Theorem can be...
Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]] such that $n > 33$. Then $n$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $5$ non-[[Definition:Zero (Number)|zero]] [[Definition:Square Number|squares]].
From [[Lagrange's Four Square Theorem]], every [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] can be expressed as the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $4$ [[Definition:Square Number|squares]], some of which may be [[Definition:Zero (Number)|zero]]. The existence of [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive intege...
Integer as Sum of 5 Non-Zero Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_as_Sum_of_5_Non-Zero_Squares
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_as_Sum_of_5_Non-Zero_Squares
[ "Sums of Squares" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Square Number" ]
[ "Lagrange's Four Square Theorem", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Square Number", "Lagrange's Four Square Th...
proofwiki-12864
Bottom in Compact Closure
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a bounded below ordered set. Let $x \in S$. Then: :$\bot \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ where: :$\bot$ denotes the smallest element in $L$ :$ x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ denotes the compact closure of $x$.
By Bottom is Compact: :$\bot$ is a compact element. By definition of the smallest element: :$\bot \preceq x$ Thus by definition of compact closure: :$\bot \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ {{qed}} Category:Way Below Relation 2z4a1pcn8t5hdg1ggxblyw896p9vkg1
Let $L = \struct {S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below Set|bounded below]] [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Let $x \in S$. Then: :$\bot \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ where: :$\bot$ denotes the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]] in $L$ :$ x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ denotes the [[Definition:Comp...
By [[Bottom is Compact]]: :$\bot$ is a [[Definition:Compact Element|compact element]]. By definition of the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]]: :$\bot \preceq x$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Compact Closure|compact closure]]: :$\bot \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ {{qed}} [[Category:Way Below Relation...
Bottom in Compact Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bottom_in_Compact_Closure
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bottom_in_Compact_Closure
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Compact Closure" ]
[ "Bottom is Compact", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Compact Closure", "Category:Way Below Relation" ]
proofwiki-12865
Triplets of Products of Two Distinct Primes
The following triplets of consecutive positive integers are the smallest in which each number is the product of $2$ distinct prime numbers: :$33, 34, 35$ :$85, 86, 87$ :$93, 94, 95$ :$141, 142, 143$ :$201, 202, 203$ :$213, 214, 215$ :$217, 218, 219$
Taking each triplet in turn: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 33 | r = 3 \times 11 }} {{eqn | l = 34 | r = 2 \times 17 }} {{eqn | l = 35 | r = 5 \times 7 }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 85 | r = 5 \times 17 }} {{eqn | l = 86 | r = 2 \times 43 }} {{eqn | l = 87 | r = 3 \times 29 }} ...
The following [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triplets]] of consecutive [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] are the smallest in which each number is the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of $2$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]]: :$33, 34, 35$ :$85, 86, 87$...
Taking each [[Definition:Ordered Triple|triplet]] in turn: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 33 | r = 3 \times 11 }} {{eqn | l = 34 | r = 2 \times 17 }} {{eqn | l = 35 | r = 5 \times 7 }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 85 | r = 5 \times 17 }} {{eqn | l = 86 | r = 2 \times 43 }} {{eqn | ...
Triplets of Products of Two Distinct Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triplets_of_Products_of_Two_Distinct_Primes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Triplets_of_Products_of_Two_Distinct_Primes
[ "Semiprimes" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Semiprime Number", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-12866
Product of Two Distinct Primes has 4 Positive Divisors
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a positive integer which is the product of $2$ distinct primes. Then $n$ has exactly $4$ positive divisors.
Let $n = p \times q$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes. We have by definition of divisor: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | o = \divides | r = n | c = One Divides all Integers }} {{eqn | l = p | o = \divides | r = n | c = {{Defof|Divisor of Integer}} }} {{eqn | l = q | o = \divides ...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which is the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of $2$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]. Then $n$ has exactly $4$ [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]] [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]].
Let $n = p \times q$ where $p$ and $q$ are [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]. We have by definition of [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisor]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | o = \divides | r = n | c = [[One Divides all Integers]] }} {{eqn | l = p | o = \divides | r = n | c = {{...
Product of Two Distinct Primes has 4 Positive Divisors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Two_Distinct_Primes_has_4_Positive_Divisors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Two_Distinct_Primes_has_4_Positive_Divisors
[ "Semiprimes" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Integer Divisor Results/One Divides all Integers", "Integer Divisor Results/Integer Divides Itself", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Euclid's Lemma", "Definition:Pri...
proofwiki-12867
Product of Two Distinct Primes is Multiplicatively Perfect
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a positive integer which is the product of $2$ distinct primes. Then $n$ is multiplicatively perfect.
Let $n = p \times q$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes. From Product of Two Distinct Primes has 4 Positive Divisors, the positive divisors of $n$ are: :$1, p, q, pq$ Thus the product of all the divisors of $n$ is: :$1 \times p \times q \times p q = p^2 q^2 = n^2$ Hence the result, by definition of multiplicatively perfect. ...
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which is the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of $2$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]. Then $n$ is [[Definition:Multiplicatively Perfect Number|multiplicatively perfect]].
Let $n = p \times q$ where $p$ and $q$ are [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]. From [[Product of Two Distinct Primes has 4 Positive Divisors]], the [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]] [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]] of $n$ are: :$1, p, q, pq$ Thus the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of a...
Product of Two Distinct Primes is Multiplicatively Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Two_Distinct_Primes_is_Multiplicatively_Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Two_Distinct_Primes_is_Multiplicatively_Perfect
[ "Semiprimes", "Multiplicatively Perfect Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Multiplicatively Perfect Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Product of Two Distinct Primes has 4 Positive Divisors", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Multiplicatively Perfect Number" ]
proofwiki-12868
Cube of Prime has 4 Positive Divisors
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a positive integer which is the cube of a prime number. Then $n$ has exactly $4$ positive divisors.
Let $n = p^3$ where $p$ is prime. The positive divisors of $n$ are: :$1, p, p^2, p^3$ This result follows from Divisors of Power of Prime. {{qed}}
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which is the [[Definition:Cube (Algebra)|cube]] of a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Then $n$ has exactly $4$ [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]] [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]].
Let $n = p^3$ where $p$ is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]. The [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]] [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]] of $n$ are: :$1, p, p^2, p^3$ This result follows from [[Divisors of Power of Prime]]. {{qed}}
Cube of Prime has 4 Positive Divisors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_of_Prime_has_4_Positive_Divisors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_of_Prime_has_4_Positive_Divisors
[ "Cube Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Cube/Algebra", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Divisors of Power of Prime" ]
proofwiki-12869
Cube of Prime is Multiplicatively Perfect
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a positive integer which is the cube of a prime number. Then $n$ is multiplicatively perfect.
Let $n = p^3$ where $p$ is prime. From Cube of Prime has 4 Positive Divisors, the positive divisors of $n$ are: :$1, p, p^2, p^3$ Thus the product of all the divisors of $n$ is: :$1 \times p \times p^2 \times p^3 = p^6 = n^2$ Hence the result, by definition of multiplicatively perfect. {{qed}}
Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] which is the [[Definition:Cube (Algebra)|cube]] of a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Then $n$ is [[Definition:Multiplicatively Perfect Number|multiplicatively perfect]].
Let $n = p^3$ where $p$ is [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]. From [[Cube of Prime has 4 Positive Divisors]], the [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]] [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisors]] of $n$ are: :$1, p, p^2, p^3$ Thus the [[Definition:Integer Multiplication|product]] of all the [[Definition:Divisor of ...
Cube of Prime is Multiplicatively Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_of_Prime_is_Multiplicatively_Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cube_of_Prime_is_Multiplicatively_Perfect
[ "Cube Numbers", "Multiplicatively Perfect Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Cube/Algebra", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Multiplicatively Perfect Number" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Cube of Prime has 4 Positive Divisors", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Multiplication/Integers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Multiplicatively Perfect Number" ]
proofwiki-12870
Compact Closure is Directed
Let $L = \left({S, \vee, \preceq}\right)$ be a bounded below join semilattice. Let $x \in S$. Then $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ is directed where $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ denotes the compact closure of $x$.
By Bottom in Compact Closure: :$\bot \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ where $\bot$ denotes the smallest element in $L$. Thus by definition: :$x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ is non-empty. Let $y, z \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ By definition of compact closure: :$y$ and $z$ are compact elements and $y \preceq x$ and $z \preceq x$ By def...
Let $L = \left({S, \vee, \preceq}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below Set|bounded below]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $x \in S$. Then $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ is [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed]] where $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ denotes the [[Definition:Compact Closure|compact closur...
By [[Bottom in Compact Closure]]: :$\bot \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ where $\bot$ denotes the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]] in $L$. Thus by definition: :$x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ is [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]]. Let $y, z \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ By definition of [[Definition:Compact Clos...
Compact Closure is Directed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Closure_is_Directed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Closure_is_Directed
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Compact Closure" ]
[ "Bottom in Compact Closure", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Compact Closure", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Element is Way Below", "Join Succeeds Operand...
proofwiki-12871
Sum of 2 Lucky Numbers in 4 Ways
The number $34$ is the smallest positive integer to be the sum of $2$ lucky numbers in $4$ different ways.
The sequence of lucky numbers begins: :$1, 3, 7, 9, 13, 15, 21, 25, 31, 33, \ldots$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 34 | r = 1 + 33 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 + 31 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 9 + 25 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 13 + 21 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The number $34$ is the smallest [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]] to be the [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of $2$ [[Definition:Lucky Number|lucky numbers]] in $4$ different ways.
The [[Definition:Lucky Number/Sequence|sequence of lucky numbers]] begins: :$1, 3, 7, 9, 13, 15, 21, 25, 31, 33, \ldots$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 34 | r = 1 + 33 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 3 + 31 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 9 + 25 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 13 + 21 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{...
Sum of 2 Lucky Numbers in 4 Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_2_Lucky_Numbers_in_4_Ways
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_2_Lucky_Numbers_in_4_Ways
[ "Lucky Numbers", "34" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Lucky Number" ]
[ "Definition:Lucky Number/Sequence" ]
proofwiki-12872
35 Hexominoes
There exist $35$ distinct free hexominoes: :600px
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
There exist $35$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Free Polyomino|free]] [[Definition:Hexomino|hexominoes]]: :[[File:35Hexominoes.png|600px]]
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
35 Hexominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/35_Hexominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/35_Hexominoes
[ "Hexominoes", "35" ]
[ "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Polyomino/Free", "Definition:Hexomino", "File:35Hexominoes.png" ]
[]
proofwiki-12873
Fixed Point of Permutation is Fixed Point of Power
Let $S_n$ denote the symmetric group on $n$ letters. Let $\sigma \in S_n$. Let $i \in \Fix \sigma$, where $\Fix \sigma$ denotes the set of fixed elements of $\sigma$. Then for all $m \in \Z$: :$i \in \Fix {\sigma^m}$
It follows from Integers form Ordered Integral Domain that for any integer $m$ either: :$m = 0$ or :$m > 0$ or: :$m < 0$
Let $S_n$ denote the [[Definition:Symmetric Group on n Letters|symmetric group on $n$ letters]]. Let $\sigma \in S_n$. Let $i \in \Fix \sigma$, where $\Fix \sigma$ denotes the [[Definition:Set of Fixed Elements|set of fixed elements]] of $\sigma$. Then for all $m \in \Z$: :$i \in \Fix {\sigma^m}$
It follows from [[Integers form Ordered Integral Domain]] that for any integer $m$ either: :$m = 0$ or :$m > 0$ or: :$m < 0$
Fixed Point of Permutation is Fixed Point of Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Permutation_is_Fixed_Point_of_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Permutation_is_Fixed_Point_of_Power
[ "Symmetric Groups", "Permutations" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Group/n Letters", "Definition:Fixed Element under Permutation/Set of Fixed Elements" ]
[ "Integers form Ordered Integral Domain" ]
proofwiki-12874
Real Symmetric Matrix is Hermitian
Every real symmetric matrix is Hermitian.
Let $\mathbf A$ be a real symmetric matrix. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {\mathbf A}^\dagger_{i j} | r = \overline {\sqbrk {\mathbf A}_{ji} } | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = \sqbrk {\mathbf A}_{ji} | c = Complex Number equals Conjugate iff Wholly Real: $\mathbf A$ ...
Every [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Symmetric Matrix|symmetric matrix]] is [[Definition:Hermitian Matrix|Hermitian]].
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Symmetric Matrix|symmetric matrix]]. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {\mathbf A}^\dagger_{i j} | r = \overline {\sqbrk {\mathbf A}_{ji} } | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = \sqbrk {\mathbf A}_{ji} | c = ...
Real Symmetric Matrix is Hermitian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Symmetric_Matrix_is_Hermitian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Symmetric_Matrix_is_Hermitian
[ "Real Matrices", "Symmetric Matrices", "Hermitian Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Symmetric Matrix", "Definition:Hermitian Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Symmetric Matrix", "Complex Number equals Conjugate iff Wholly Real", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Symmetric Matrix", "Definition:Hermitian Matrix" ]
proofwiki-12875
Hexominoes cannot form Rectangle
While there are a total of $210$ squares in a complete set of hexominoes, it is impossible to build them into a rectangle of side lengths $a$ and $b$ where $a \times b = 210$.
{{ProofWanted|I'll have to check this, but I think the proof is along the lines that if you coloured them in a checkerboard pattern, you can't get an equal number of black and white squares.}}
While there are a total of $210$ [[Definition:Square (Geometry)|squares]] in a complete set of [[Definition:Hexomino|hexominoes]], it is impossible to build them into a [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangle]] of [[Definition:Side of Polygon|side]] [[Definition:Length of Line|lengths]] $a$ and $b$ where $a \times b = 210$.
{{ProofWanted|I'll have to check this, but I think the proof is along the lines that if you coloured them in a checkerboard pattern, you can't get an equal number of black and white squares.}}
Hexominoes cannot form Rectangle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hexominoes_cannot_form_Rectangle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hexominoes_cannot_form_Rectangle
[ "Hexominoes" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Square", "Definition:Hexomino", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length" ]
[]
proofwiki-12876
Number of Heptominoes
There exist $108$ distinct free heptominoes, one of which has a hole: :600px
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
There exist $108$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Free Polyomino|free]] [[Definition:Heptomino|heptominoes]], one of which has a hole: :[[File:108Heptominoes.png|600px]]
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
Number of Heptominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Heptominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Heptominoes
[ "Heptominoes", "108" ]
[ "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Polyomino/Free", "Definition:Heptomino", "File:108Heptominoes.png" ]
[]
proofwiki-12877
369 Octominoes
There exist $369$ distinct free octominoes, $6$ of which have a hole: :600px
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
There exist $369$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Free Polyomino|free]] [[Definition:Octomino|octominoes]], $6$ of which have a hole: :[[File:369Octominoes.png|600px]]
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
369 Octominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/369_Octominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/369_Octominoes
[ "Polyominoes", "369" ]
[ "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Polyomino/Free", "Definition:Octomino", "File:369Octominoes.png" ]
[]
proofwiki-12878
1285 9-ominoes
There exist $1285$ distinct free $9$-ominoes, $37$ of which have a hole: :600px
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
There exist $1285$ [[Definition:Distinct|distinct]] [[Definition:Free Polyomino|free]] [[Definition:Polyomino|$9$-ominoes]], $37$ of which have a hole: :[[File:1285-9ominoes.png|600px]]
{{ProofWanted|Work to be done yet to establish method of creation}}
1285 9-ominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1285_9-ominoes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/1285_9-ominoes
[ "Polyominoes", "1285" ]
[ "Definition:Distinct", "Definition:Polyomino/Free", "Definition:Polyomino", "File:1285-9ominoes.png" ]
[]
proofwiki-12879
Mapping Assigning to Element Its Compact Closure is Order Isomorphism
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a bounded below algebraic join semilattice. Let $C = \struct {\map K L, \preceq'}$ be an ordered subset of $L$ where $\map K L$ denotes the compact subset of $L$. Let $I = \struct {\map {\mathit {Ids} } C, \precsim}$ be an inclusion ordered set where $\map {\mathit {Ids} } C$ den...
We will prove that :$f$ is an order embedding. Let $x, y \in S$. '''Sufficient condition''' Assume that :$x \preceq y$ By Compact Closure is Increasing: :$x^{\mathrm {compact} } \subseteq y^{\mathrm {compact} }$ By definition of $f$: :$\map f x \subseteq \map f y$ Thus by definition of inclusion ordered set: :$\map f x...
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Below Set|bounded below]] [[Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set|algebraic]] [[Definition:Join Semilattice|join semilattice]]. Let $C = \struct {\map K L, \preceq'}$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Subset|ordered subset]] of $L$ where $\map K L$ denotes the [[Defi...
We will prove that :$f$ is an [[Definition:Order Embedding|order embedding]]. Let $x, y \in S$. '''Sufficient condition''' Assume that :$x \preceq y$ By [[Compact Closure is Increasing]]: :$x^{\mathrm {compact} } \subseteq y^{\mathrm {compact} }$ By definition of $f$: :$\map f x \subseteq \map f y$ Thus by defin...
Mapping Assigning to Element Its Compact Closure is Order Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_Assigning_to_Element_Its_Compact_Closure_is_Order_Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_Assigning_to_Element_Its_Compact_Closure_is_Order_Isomorphism
[ "Order Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Below Set", "Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set", "Definition:Join Semilattice", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Compact Subset of Lattice", "Definition:Inclusion Ordered Set", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Ideal (Order Theory)", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition...
[ "Definition:Order Embedding", "Compact Closure is Increasing", "Definition:Inclusion Ordered Set", "Definition:Inclusion Ordered Set", "Supremum of Subset", "Definition:Algebraic Ordered Set", "Axiom:Axiom of K-Approximation", "Axiom:Axiom of K-Approximation", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:...
proofwiki-12880
Maximum Length of Non-Crossing Knight's Tour
The maximum length of a non-crossing knight's tour on a standard chessboard is $35$ moves.
{{ProofWanted|Lots of background material needed first.}}
The maximum length of a non-crossing [[Definition:Knight's Tour|knight's tour]] on a standard [[Definition:Chessboard|chessboard]] is $35$ moves.
{{ProofWanted|Lots of background material needed first.}}
Maximum Length of Non-Crossing Knight's Tour
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Maximum_Length_of_Non-Crossing_Knight's_Tour
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Maximum_Length_of_Non-Crossing_Knight's_Tour
[ "Recreational Mathematics", "35", "Recreational Chess", "Knight's Tours" ]
[ "Definition:Knight's Tour", "Definition:Chess/Chessboard" ]
[]
proofwiki-12881
Prime Factors of 35, 36, 4734 and 4735
The integers: :$35, 4374$ have the same prime factors between them as the integers: :$36, 4375$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 35 | r = 5 \times 7 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 4374 | r = 2 \times 3^7 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 36 | r = 2^2 \times 3^2 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 4375 | r = 5^4 \times 7 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Thus both pairs of integers can...
The [[Definition:Integer|integers]]: :$35, 4374$ have the same [[Definition:Prime Factor|prime factors]] between them as the [[Definition:Integer|integers]]: :$36, 4375$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 35 | r = 5 \times 7 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 4374 | r = 2 \times 3^7 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 36 | r = 2^2 \times 3^2 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 4375 | r = 5^4 \times 7 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Thus both pairs of integer...
Prime Factors of 35, 36, 4734 and 4735
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Factors_of_35,_36,_4734_and_4735
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Factors_of_35,_36,_4734_and_4735
[ "Factorization", "35", "36", "4374", "4375" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Prime Factor", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Factor" ]
proofwiki-12882
Equivalence Class of Fixed Element
Let $S_n$ denote the symmetric group on $n$ letters. Let $\sigma \in S_n$. Let $\RR_\sigma$ denote the equivalence defined in Permutation Induces Equivalence Relation. Let $i \in \N^*_{\le n}$. Then: :$i \in \Fix \sigma$ {{iff}} $\eqclass i {\RR_\sigma} = \set i$ where: :$\eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ denotes the equivalenc...
By the definition of an equivalence relation it is easily seen that $\set i \subseteq \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$. Suppose that $i \in \Fix \sigma$. Let $j \in \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$. Then by Condition for Membership of Equivalence Class and Permutation Induces Equivalence Relation: :$j \in \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma} \iff ...
Let $S_n$ denote the [[Definition:Symmetric Group on n Letters|symmetric group on $n$ letters]]. Let $\sigma \in S_n$. Let $\RR_\sigma$ denote the [[Definition:Equivalence Relation Induced by Mapping|equivalence]] defined in [[Permutation Induces Equivalence Relation]]. Let $i \in \N^*_{\le n}$. Then: :$i \in \Fix...
By the definition of an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] it is easily seen that $\set i \subseteq \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$. Suppose that $i \in \Fix \sigma$. Let $j \in \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$. Then by [[Condition for Membership of Equivalence Class]] and [[Permutation Induces Equivalence ...
Equivalence Class of Fixed Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_Class_of_Fixed_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_Class_of_Fixed_Element
[ "Symmetric Groups", "Equivalence Classes" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Group/n Letters", "Definition:Equivalence Relation Induced by Mapping", "Permutation Induces Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Class", "Definition:Fixed Element under Permutation/Set of Fixed Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Condition for Membership of Equivalence Class", "Permutation Induces Equivalence Relation", "Fixed Point of Permutation is Fixed Point of Power", "Category:Symmetric Groups", "Category:Equivalence Classes" ]
proofwiki-12883
Number of Odd Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle is Power of 2
The number of odd entries in a row of Pascal's triangle is a power of $2$.
Let $n, k \in \Z$. Let the representations of $n$ and $k$ to the base $p$ be given by: :$n = 2^r a_r + \cdots + 2 a_1 + a_0$ :$k = 2^r b_r + \cdots + 2 b_1 + b_0$ By {{Corollary|Lucas' Theorem}}: :$\ds \dbinom n k \equiv \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^r \dbinom {a_j} {b_j} \pmod 2$ By definition, $a_j$ and $b_j$ are either $0$ ...
The number of [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]] entries in a [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|row]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] is a [[Definition:Integer Power|power]] of $2$.
Let $n, k \in \Z$. Let the [[Definition:Number Base|representations of $n$ and $k$ to the base $p$]] be given by: :$n = 2^r a_r + \cdots + 2 a_1 + a_0$ :$k = 2^r b_r + \cdots + 2 b_1 + b_0$ By {{Corollary|Lucas' Theorem}}: :$\ds \dbinom n k \equiv \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^r \dbinom {a_j} {b_j} \pmod 2$ By definition,...
Number of Odd Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle is Power of 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Odd_Entries_in_Row_of_Pascal's_Triangle_is_Power_of_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Odd_Entries_in_Row_of_Pascal's_Triangle_is_Power_of_2
[ "Pascal's Triangle" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Number Base", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Product Rule for Counting", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Defi...
proofwiki-12884
Compact Closure is Increasing
Let $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be an ordered set. Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq y$ Then $x^{\mathrm{compact} } \subseteq y^{\mathrm{compact} }$ where $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ denotes the compact closure of $x$.
Let $z \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ By definition of compact closure: :$z$ is a compact element and $z \preceq x$ By definition of transitivity: :$z \preceq y$ Thus by definition of compact closure: :$z \in y^{\mathrm{compact} }$ {{qed}}
Let $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be an [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]]. Let $x, y \in S$ such that :$x \preceq y$ Then $x^{\mathrm{compact} } \subseteq y^{\mathrm{compact} }$ where $x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ denotes the [[Definition:Compact Closure|compact closure]] of $x$.
Let $z \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ By definition of [[Definition:Compact Closure|compact closure]]: :$z$ is a [[Definition:Compact Element|compact element]] and $z \preceq x$ By definition of [[Definition:Transitivity|transitivity]]: :$z \preceq y$ Thus by definition of [[Definition:Compact Closure|compact closure]]:...
Compact Closure is Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Closure_is_Increasing
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Closure_is_Increasing
[ "Way Below Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Compact Closure" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Closure", "Definition:Compact Element", "Definition:Transitive", "Definition:Compact Closure" ]
proofwiki-12885
Sufficient Conditions for Weak Extremum
Let $J$ be a functional such that: :$\ds J \sqbrk y = \int_a^b \map F {x, y, y'} \rd x$ :$\map y a = A$ :$\map y b = B$ Let $y = \map y x$ be an extremum. Let the strengthened Legendre's Condition hold. Let the strengthened Jacobi's Necessary Condition hold. {{explain|specific links to those strengthened versions}} The...
By the continuity of function $\map P x$ and the solution of Jacobi's equation: :$\exists \epsilon > 0: \paren {\forall x \in \closedint a {b + \epsilon}:\map P x > 0} \land \paren {\tilde a \notin \closedint a {b + \epsilon} }$ Consider the quadratic functional: :$\ds \int_a^b \paren {P h'^2 + Q h^2} \rd x - \alpha^2 ...
Let $J$ be a [[Definition:Real Functional|functional]] such that: :$\ds J \sqbrk y = \int_a^b \map F {x, y, y'} \rd x$ :$\map y a = A$ :$\map y b = B$ Let $y = \map y x$ be an [[Definition:Extremum of Functional|extremum]]. Let the strengthened [[Legendre's Condition]] hold. Let the strengthened [[Jacobi's Necessar...
By the [[Definition:Continuous Real Function on Interval|continuity]] of [[Definition:Function|function]] $\map P x$ and the [[Definition:Solution to Differential Equation|solution]] of [[Definition:Jacobi's Equation of Functional|Jacobi's equation]]: :$\exists \epsilon > 0: \paren {\forall x \in \closedint a {b + \ep...
Sufficient Conditions for Weak Extremum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sufficient_Conditions_for_Weak_Extremum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sufficient_Conditions_for_Weak_Extremum
[ "Calculus of Variations" ]
[ "Definition:Functional/Real", "Definition:Extremum/Functional", "Legendre's Condition", "Jacobi's Necessary Condition", "Definition:Functional/Real", "Definition:Weak Minimum" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Interval", "Definition:Function", "Definition:Differential Equation/Solution", "Definition:Jacobi's Equation of Functional", "Definition:Quadratic Functional", "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation", "Definition:Euler's Equation for Vanishing Variation...
proofwiki-12886
Sum of Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle
The sum of all the entries in the $n$th row of Pascal's triangle is equal to $2^n$.
By definition, the entries in $n$th row of Pascal's triangle are exactly the binomial coefficients: :$\dbinom n 0, \dbinom n 1, \ldots, \dbinom n n$ The result follows from Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of all the entries in the [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|$n$th row]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] is equal to $2^n$.
By definition, the entries in [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|$n$th row]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] are exactly the [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficients]]: :$\dbinom n 0, \dbinom n 1, \ldots, \dbinom n n$ The result follows from [[Sum of Binomial Coefficients over L...
Sum of Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Entries_in_Row_of_Pascal's_Triangle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Entries_in_Row_of_Pascal's_Triangle/Proof_1
[ "Sum of Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle", "Pascal's Triangle" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle" ]
[ "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index" ]
proofwiki-12887
Sum of Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle
The sum of all the entries in the $n$th row of Pascal's triangle is equal to $2^n$.
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :The sum of all the entries in the $n$th row of Pascal's triangle is equal to $2^n$. === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case: :The sum of all the entries in the row $0$ of Pascal's triangle is equal to $2^0 = ...
The [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of all the entries in the [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|$n$th row]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] is equal to $2^n$.
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :The [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of all the entries in the [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|$n$th row]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pasca...
Sum of Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Entries_in_Row_of_Pascal's_Triangle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Entries_in_Row_of_Pascal's_Triangle/Proof_2
[ "Sum of Entries in Row of Pascal's Triangle", "Pascal's Triangle" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Defi...
proofwiki-12888
Columns of Pascal's Triangle contain Simplicial Polytopic Numbers
The columns of Pascal's triangle contain the simplicial polytopic numbers: : Column $0$: repeated instances of number $1$ : Column $1$: the (strictly) positive integers : Column $2$: the triangular numbers : Column $3$: the tetrahedral numbers : Column $4$: the pentatope numbers and so on.
{{ProofWanted|Need to define the simplicial polytopic numbers and demonstrate that the $n$th simplicial polytopic number of dimension $m$ is $\dbinom m n$ or whatever the formula is.}}
The [[Definition:Column of Pascal's Triangle|columns of Pascal's triangle]] contain the [[Definition:Simplicial Polytopic Number|simplicial polytopic numbers]]: : [[Definition:Column of Pascal's Triangle|Column $0$]]: repeated instances of [[1|number $1$]] : [[Definition:Column of Pascal's Triangle|Column $1$]]: the ...
{{ProofWanted|Need to define the [[Definition:Simplicial Polytopic Number|simplicial polytopic numbers]] and demonstrate that the $n$th [[Definition:Simplicial Polytopic Number|simplicial polytopic number]] of dimension $m$ is $\dbinom m n$ or whatever the formula is.}}
Columns of Pascal's Triangle contain Simplicial Polytopic Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Columns_of_Pascal's_Triangle_contain_Simplicial_Polytopic_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Columns_of_Pascal's_Triangle_contain_Simplicial_Polytopic_Numbers
[ "Pascal's Triangle", "Simplicial Polytopic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Column", "Definition:Simplicial Polytopic Number", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Column", "1", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Column", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Column", "Definition:Triangular Number", "Definition:Pascal's Tria...
[ "Definition:Simplicial Polytopic Number", "Definition:Simplicial Polytopic Number" ]
proofwiki-12889
Equivalence Class of Fixed Element/Corollary
:$i \notin \Fix \sigma$ {{iff}} $\eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ contains more than one element
From Equivalence Class of Fixed Element and Biconditional Equivalent to Biconditional of Negations: :$i \notin \Fix \sigma \iff \set i \ne \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ Because the Biconditional is Transitive, it suffices to show that: :$\set i \ne \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ {{iff}}: :$\eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ contains more t...
:$i \notin \Fix \sigma$ {{iff}} $\eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ contains more than one [[Definition:Element|element]]
From [[Equivalence Class of Fixed Element]] and [[Biconditional Equivalent to Biconditional of Negations]]: :$i \notin \Fix \sigma \iff \set i \ne \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ Because the [[Biconditional is Transitive]], it suffices to show that: :$\set i \ne \eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ {{iff}}: :$\eqclass i {\RR_\sigma}$ ...
Equivalence Class of Fixed Element/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_Class_of_Fixed_Element/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_Class_of_Fixed_Element/Corollary
[ "Symmetric Groups", "Equivalence Classes" ]
[ "Definition:Element" ]
[ "Equivalence Class of Fixed Element", "Biconditional Equivalent to Biconditional of Negations", "Biconditional is Transitive", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "Category:Symmetric Groups", "Category:Equivalence Classes" ]
proofwiki-12890
Sum of Entries in Lesser Diagonal of Pascal's Triangle equal Fibonacci Number
The sum of the entries in the $n$th lesser diagonal of Pascal's triangle equals the $n + 1$th Fibonacci number.
By definition, the entries in the $n$th lesser diagonal of Pascal's triangle are: :$\dbinom n 0, \dbinom {n - 1} 1, \dbinom {n - 2} 2, \dbinom {n - 3} 3, \ldots$ and so the statement can be written: :$F_{n + 1} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \dbinom {n - k} k$ The proof proceeds by strong induction. For all $n \in \Z_{>0...
The [[Definition:Integer Addition|sum]] of the entries in the $n$th [[Definition:Lesser Diagonal of Pascal's Triangle|lesser diagonal]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] equals the $n + 1$th [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci number]].
By definition, the entries in the $n$th [[Definition:Lesser Diagonal of Pascal's Triangle|lesser diagonal]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] are: :$\dbinom n 0, \dbinom {n - 1} 1, \dbinom {n - 2} 2, \dbinom {n - 3} 3, \ldots$ and so the statement can be written: :$F_{n + 1} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop \...
Sum of Entries in Lesser Diagonal of Pascal's Triangle equal Fibonacci Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Entries_in_Lesser_Diagonal_of_Pascal's_Triangle_equal_Fibonacci_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Entries_in_Lesser_Diagonal_of_Pascal's_Triangle_equal_Fibonacci_Number
[ "Pascal's Triangle", "Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Lesser Diagonal", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Lesser Diagonal", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Second Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-12891
Extension of Infima Preserving Mapping to Complete Lattice Preserves Infima
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$, $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be ordered sets. Let $L_3 = \struct {S_3, \preceq_3}$ be a complete lattice. Suppose that. :$L_2$ is an infima inheriting ordered subset of $L_3$. Let $f: S_1 \to S_2$ be a mapping such that: :$f$ preserves infima. Then $f: S_1 \to S_3$ preserves in...
By definition of ordered subset: :$S_2 \subseteq S_3$ Then define $g = f:S_1 \to S_3$ Let $X$ be a subset of $S_1$ such that :$X$ admits a infimum in $L_1$. Thus by definition of complete lattice: :$g \sqbrk X$ admits a infimum in $L_3$. By definition of mapping preserves infima: :$f \sqbrk X$ admits a infimum in $L_2$...
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$, $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $L_3 = \struct {S_3, \preceq_3}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattice]]. Suppose that. :$L_2$ is an [[Definition:Infima Inheriting|infima inheriting]] [[Definition:Ordered Subset|orde...
By definition of [[Definition:Ordered Subset|ordered subset]]: :$S_2 \subseteq S_3$ Then define $g = f:S_1 \to S_3$ Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S_1$ such that :$X$ admits a [[Definition:Infimum of Set|infimum]] in $L_1$. Thus by definition of [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattice]]: :$g \s...
Extension of Infima Preserving Mapping to Complete Lattice Preserves Infima
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Infima_Preserving_Mapping_to_Complete_Lattice_Preserves_Infima
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Infima_Preserving_Mapping_to_Complete_Lattice_Preserves_Infima
[ "Order Theory", "Complete Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Infima Inheriting", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Infimum/All", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Infima Inheriting" ]
proofwiki-12892
Extension of Directed Suprema Preserving Mapping to Complete Lattice Preserves Directed Suprema
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be ordered sets. Let $L_3 = \struct {S_3, \preceq_3}$ be a complete lattice. Suppose that :$L_2$ is directed suprema inheriting ordered subset of $L_3$. Let $f:S_1 \to S_2$ be a mapping such that :$f$ preserves directed suprema. Then $f:S_1 \to S...
By definition of ordered subset: :$S_2 \subseteq S_3$ Then define $g = f: S_1 \to S_3$ Let $X$ be a directed subset of $S_1$ such that :$X$ admits a supremum in $L_1$. Thus by definition of complete lattice: :$g \sqbrk X$ admits a supremum in $L_3$. By definition of mapping preserves directed suprema: :$f \sqbrk X$ adm...
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered sets]]. Let $L_3 = \struct {S_3, \preceq_3}$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattice]]. Suppose that :$L_2$ is [[Definition:Directed Suprema Inheriting|directed suprema inheriting]] [[Definition:O...
By definition of [[Definition:Ordered Subset|ordered subset]]: :$S_2 \subseteq S_3$ Then define $g = f: S_1 \to S_3$ Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Directed Subset|directed subset]] of $S_1$ such that :$X$ admits a [[Definition:Supremum of Set|supremum]] in $L_1$. Thus by definition of [[Definition:Complete Lattice|compl...
Extension of Directed Suprema Preserving Mapping to Complete Lattice Preserves Directed Suprema
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Directed_Suprema_Preserving_Mapping_to_Complete_Lattice_Preserves_Directed_Suprema
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Directed_Suprema_Preserving_Mapping_to_Complete_Lattice_Preserves_Directed_Suprema
[ "Order Theory", "Complete Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Directed Suprema Inheriting", "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/Directed", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/Directed" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Subset", "Definition:Directed Subset", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Definition:Mapping Preserves Supremum/Directed", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Directed Suprema Preserving Mapping is Increasing", "Definition:Incre...
proofwiki-12893
Rows in Pascal's Triangle containing Numbers in Arithmetic Sequence
There are an infinite number of rows of Pascal's triangle which contain $3$ integers in arithmetic sequence.
Suppose $\dbinom n k$, $\dbinom n {k + 1}$ and $\dbinom n {k + 2}$ are in an arithmetic sequence. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n {k + 2} - \dbinom n {k + 1} | r = \dbinom n {k + 1} - \dbinom n k | c = {{Defof|Arithmetic Sequence}} }} {{eqn | l = \frac {n!} {\paren {n - k - 2}! \paren {k + 2}!} - ...
There are an [[Definition:Infinite Set|infinite number]] of [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|rows]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] which contain $3$ [[Definition:Integer|integers]] in [[Definition:Arithmetic Sequence|arithmetic sequence]].
Suppose $\dbinom n k$, $\dbinom n {k + 1}$ and $\dbinom n {k + 2}$ are in an [[Definition:Arithmetic Sequence|arithmetic sequence]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n {k + 2} - \dbinom n {k + 1} | r = \dbinom n {k + 1} - \dbinom n k | c = {{Defof|Arithmetic Sequence}} }} {{eqn | l = \frac {n!} {\p...
Rows in Pascal's Triangle containing Numbers in Arithmetic Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rows_in_Pascal's_Triangle_containing_Numbers_in_Arithmetic_Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rows_in_Pascal's_Triangle_containing_Numbers_in_Arithmetic_Sequence
[ "Pascal's Triangle", "Arithmetic Sequences", "Rows in Pascal's Triangle containing Numbers in Arithmetic Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Arithmetic Sequence", "Solution to Quadratic Equation", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Square Number", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle...
proofwiki-12894
Rows in Pascal's Triangle containing Numbers in Geometric Sequence
There exist no rows of Pascal's triangle which contain $3$ integers in geometric sequence.
Suppose $\dbinom n k$, $\dbinom n {k + 1}$ and $\dbinom n {k + 2}$ are in a geometric sequence. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n {k + 2} / \dbinom n {k + 1} | r = \dbinom n {k + 1} / \dbinom n k | c = {{Defof|Geometric Sequence}} }} {{eqn | l = \paren {\frac {n!} {\paren {n - k - 2}! \paren {k + 2}...
There exist no [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|rows]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] which contain $3$ [[Definition:Integer|integers]] in [[Definition:Geometric Sequence|geometric sequence]].
Suppose $\dbinom n k$, $\dbinom n {k + 1}$ and $\dbinom n {k + 2}$ are in a [[Definition:Geometric Sequence|geometric sequence]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n {k + 2} / \dbinom n {k + 1} | r = \dbinom n {k + 1} / \dbinom n k | c = {{Defof|Geometric Sequence}} }} {{eqn | l = \paren {\frac {n!}...
Rows in Pascal's Triangle containing Numbers in Geometric Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rows_in_Pascal's_Triangle_containing_Numbers_in_Geometric_Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rows_in_Pascal's_Triangle_containing_Numbers_in_Geometric_Sequence
[ "Pascal's Triangle", "Geometric Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Geometric Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Geometric Sequence", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Geometric Sequence", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Geometric Sequence" ]
proofwiki-12895
Rows in Pascal's Triangle containing Numbers in Harmonic Sequence
There exist no rows of Pascal's triangle which contain $3$ integers in harmonic sequence.
Suppose $\dbinom n k$, $\dbinom n {k + 1}$ and $\dbinom n {k + 2}$ are in a harmonic sequence. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n {k + 2}^{-1} - \dbinom n {k + 1}^{-1} | r = \dbinom n {k + 1}^{-1} - \dbinom n k^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Sequence}} }} {{eqn | l = \frac {\paren {n - k - 2}! \paren {k...
There exist no [[Definition:Row of Pascal's Triangle|rows]] of [[Definition:Pascal's Triangle|Pascal's triangle]] which contain $3$ [[Definition:Integer|integers]] in [[Definition:Harmonic Sequence|harmonic sequence]].
Suppose $\dbinom n k$, $\dbinom n {k + 1}$ and $\dbinom n {k + 2}$ are in a [[Definition:Harmonic Sequence|harmonic sequence]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n {k + 2}^{-1} - \dbinom n {k + 1}^{-1} | r = \dbinom n {k + 1}^{-1} - \dbinom n k^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Sequence}} }} {{eqn | l = \...
Rows in Pascal's Triangle containing Numbers in Harmonic Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rows_in_Pascal's_Triangle_containing_Numbers_in_Harmonic_Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rows_in_Pascal's_Triangle_containing_Numbers_in_Harmonic_Sequence
[ "Pascal's Triangle", "Harmonic Sequences" ]
[ "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Harmonic Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Sequence", "Definition:Quadratic Equation", "Definition:Discriminant of Polynomial/Quadratic Equation", "Solution to Quadratic Equation/Real Coefficients", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle/Row", "Definition:Pascal's Triangle", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Harmonic Sequence" ]
proofwiki-12896
Reciprocal as Summation of Binomial Coefficients of Reciprocals
:$\forall n \in \Z_{>0}: \dfrac 1 n = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {n - 1} k \dfrac 1 {k + 1}$ where $\dbinom {n - 1} k$ denotes a binomial coefficient. That is, for example: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac 1 1 | r = 1 }} {{eqn | l = \dfrac 1 2 | r = 1 - \dfrac 1 2 }} {{eqn | l = ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {n - 1} k \dfrac 1 {k + 1} | r = \frac 1 n \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {-1}^k \binom n {k + 1} | c = Factors of Binomial Coefficient }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 n \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {-1}^{k + 1} \binom n k | c =...
:$\forall n \in \Z_{>0}: \dfrac 1 n = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {n - 1} k \dfrac 1 {k + 1}$ where $\dbinom {n - 1} k$ denotes a [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]]. That is, for example: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac 1 1 | r = 1 }} {{eqn | l = \dfrac 1 2 ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {n - 1} k \dfrac 1 {k + 1} | r = \frac 1 n \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \paren {-1}^k \binom n {k + 1} | c = [[Factors of Binomial Coefficient]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 n \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {-1}^{k + 1} \binom n k |...
Reciprocal as Summation of Binomial Coefficients of Reciprocals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_as_Summation_of_Binomial_Coefficients_of_Reciprocals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_as_Summation_of_Binomial_Coefficients_of_Reciprocals
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Reciprocals" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Binomial Theorem" ]
proofwiki-12897
Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle is Sum of Numbers Below
The elements in the Leibniz harmonic triangle are the sum of the elements immediately below them. {{refactor|Rework this as another definition of LHT, establishing that column and diagonal $0$ are defined as the reciprocals.|level = medium}}
By definition of Leibniz harmonic triangle, element $\tuple {n, m}$ is: :$\dfrac 1 {\paren {n + 1} \binom n m}$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\paren {n + 2} \binom {n + 1} m} + \dfrac 1 {\paren {n + 2} \binom {n + 1} {m + 1} } | o = | c = Elements of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle immediatel...
The elements in the [[Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle|Leibniz harmonic triangle]] are the [[Definition:Rational Addition|sum]] of the elements immediately below them. {{refactor|Rework this as another definition of LHT, establishing that column and diagonal $0$ are defined as the reciprocals.|level = medium}}
By definition of [[Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle|Leibniz harmonic triangle]], element $\tuple {n, m}$ is: :$\dfrac 1 {\paren {n + 1} \binom n m}$ Thus we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\paren {n + 2} \binom {n + 1} m} + \dfrac 1 {\paren {n + 2} \binom {n + 1} {m + 1} } | o = | c = Eleme...
Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle is Sum of Numbers Below
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_of_Leibniz_Harmonic_Triangle_is_Sum_of_Numbers_Below
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_of_Leibniz_Harmonic_Triangle_is_Sum_of_Numbers_Below
[ "Leibniz Harmonic Triangle" ]
[ "Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle", "Definition:Addition/Rational Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle", "Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle", "Pascal's Rule" ]
proofwiki-12898
Complement of Irreducible Topological Subset is Prime Element
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $X$ be an irreducible subset of $S$ such that: :$\relcomp S X \in \tau$ Let $L = \struct {\tau, \preceq}$ be an inclusion ordered set of topology $\tau$. Then $\relcomp S X$ is prime element in $L$.
{{tidy|This proof lends itself to be rendered neatly by means of the {{TL|eqn}} template}} Let $Y, Z \in \tau$ such that :$Y \wedge Z \preceq \relcomp S X$ By definition of topological space: :$Y \cap Z \in \tau$ By Meet in Inclusion Ordered Set: :$Y \cap Z = Y \wedge Z$ By definition of inclusion ordered set: :$Y \cap...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $X$ be an [[Definition:Irreducible Space|irreducible]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $S$ such that: :$\relcomp S X \in \tau$ Let $L = \struct {\tau, \preceq}$ be an [[Definition:Inclusion Ordered Set|inclusion ordered set]] of ...
{{tidy|This proof lends itself to be rendered neatly by means of the {{TL|eqn}} template}} Let $Y, Z \in \tau$ such that :$Y \wedge Z \preceq \relcomp S X$ By definition of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]: :$Y \cap Z \in \tau$ By [[Meet in Inclusion Ordered Set]]: :$Y \cap Z = Y \wedge Z$ By defi...
Complement of Irreducible Topological Subset is Prime Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Irreducible_Topological_Subset_is_Prime_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Irreducible_Topological_Subset_is_Prime_Element
[ "Prime Elements", "Irreducible Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Irreducible Space", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Inclusion Ordered Set", "Definition:Prime Element (Order Theory)" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Meet in Inclusion Ordered Set", "Definition:Inclusion Ordered Set", "Relative Complement inverts Subsets", "Relative Complement of Relative Complement", "De Morgan's Laws (Set Theory)/Relative Complement/Complement of Intersection", "Intersection with Subset is Subset", ...
proofwiki-12899
Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle as Sum of Elements on Diagonal from Below
Consider the Leibniz harmonic triangle: {{:Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle}} Let $\tuple {n, m}$ be the element in the $n$th row and $m$th column. Then: :$\tuple {n, m} = \ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \tuple {n + 1 + k, m + k}$
Taking $r \to \infty$ in Lemma 2: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \tuple {n + 1 + k, m + k} | r = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 1} \tuple {n + k, m + k - 1} | c = Translation of Index Variable of Summation }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{r \to \infty} \paren {\tuple {n, m} - \tuple {n + r, m + r} } | c = ...
Consider the [[Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle|Leibniz harmonic triangle]]: {{:Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle}} Let $\tuple {n, m}$ be the element in the $n$th [[Definition:Row of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle|row]] and $m$th [[Definition:Column of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle|column]]. Then: :$\tuple {n, m} = \d...
Taking $r \to \infty$ in [[Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle as Sum of Elements on Diagonal from Below/Lemma 2|Lemma 2]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} \tuple {n + 1 + k, m + k} | r = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 1} \tuple {n + k, m + k - 1} | c = [[Translation of Index Variable of Summation]] ...
Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle as Sum of Elements on Diagonal from Below
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_of_Leibniz_Harmonic_Triangle_as_Sum_of_Elements_on_Diagonal_from_Below
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_of_Leibniz_Harmonic_Triangle_as_Sum_of_Elements_on_Diagonal_from_Below
[ "Leibniz Harmonic Triangle", "Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle as Sum of Elements on Diagonal from Below" ]
[ "Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle", "Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle/Row", "Definition:Leibniz Harmonic Triangle/Column" ]
[ "Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle as Sum of Elements on Diagonal from Below/Lemma 2", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Element of Leibniz Harmonic Triangle as Sum of Elements on Diagonal from Below/Lemma 2" ]