id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-14500
Wosets are Isomorphic to Each Other or Initial Segments
Let $\struct {S, \preceq_S}$ and $\struct {T, \preceq_T}$ be well-ordered sets. Then precisely one of the following hold: :$\struct {S, \preceq_S}$ is order isomorphic to $\struct {T, \preceq_T}$ or: :$\struct {S, \preceq_S}$ is order isomorphic to an initial segment in $\struct {T, \preceq_T}$ or: :$\struct {T, \prece...
If the sets $S$ and $T$ considered are empty or singletons, the theorem holds vacuously or trivially. Thus assume $S$ and $T$ each contain at least two elements. Let $U = \struct {S, \preceq_S} \cup \struct {T, \preceq_T}$. Define the following relation $\preceq$ on $U$: :$\forall x, y \in U: x \preceq y$ {{iff}}: :$x,...
Let $\struct {S, \preceq_S}$ and $\struct {T, \preceq_T}$ be [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered sets]]. Then precisely one of the following hold: :$\struct {S, \preceq_S}$ is [[Definition:Order Isomorphic Well-Orderings|order isomorphic]] to $\struct {T, \preceq_T}$ or: :$\struct {S, \preceq_S}$ is [[Definit...
If the [[Definition:Set|sets]] $S$ and $T$ considered are [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]] or [[Definition:Singleton|singletons]], the theorem holds [[Definition:Vacuous|vacuously]] or trivially. Thus assume $S$ and $T$ each contain at least two elements. Let $U = \struct {S, \preceq_S} \cup \struct {T, \preceq_T}$. ...
Wosets are Isomorphic to Each Other or Initial Segments/Proof Without Using Choice
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wosets_are_Isomorphic_to_Each_Other_or_Initial_Segments
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wosets_are_Isomorphic_to_Each_Other_or_Initial_Segments/Proof_Without_Using_Choice
[ "Wosets are Isomorphic to Each Other or Initial Segments", "Well-Orderings" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Order Isomorphism/Well-Orderings", "Definition:Order Isomorphism/Well-Orderings", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Order Isomorphism/Well-Orderings", "Definition:Initial Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Vacuous", "Definition:Well-Ordering", "Definition:Total Ordering", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Transitive Relation", "Definition:Antisymmetric Relation", "Definition:Total Ordering", "Definition:Well-O...
proofwiki-14501
Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set Unique up to Isomorphism
Let $\Omega, \Omega'$ be minimal uncountable well-ordered sets. Then $\Omega$ is order isomorphic to $\Omega'$. That is, the minimal uncountable well-ordered set is unique up to order isomorphism.
From Wosets are Isomorphic to Each Other or Initial Segments, precisely one of the following holds: :$\Omega$ is order isomorphic to $\Omega'$ or: :$\Omega$ is order isomorphic to an initial segment in $\Omega'$ or: :$\Omega'$ is order isomorphic to an initial segment in $\Omega$. By the definition of minimal uncountab...
Let $\Omega, \Omega'$ be [[Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set|minimal uncountable well-ordered sets]]. Then $\Omega$ is [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphic]] to $\Omega'$. That is, the [[Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set|minimal uncountable well-ordered set]] is [[Definition:Un...
From [[Wosets are Isomorphic to Each Other or Initial Segments]], precisely one of the following holds: :$\Omega$ is [[Definition:Order Isomorphic Well-Orderings|order isomorphic]] to $\Omega'$ or: :$\Omega$ is [[Definition:Order Isomorphic Well-Orderings|order isomorphic]] to an [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial...
Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set Unique up to Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimal_Uncountable_Well-Ordered_Set_Unique_up_to_Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimal_Uncountable_Well-Ordered_Set_Unique_up_to_Isomorphism
[ "Well-Orderings", "Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Order Isomorphism" ]
[ "Wosets are Isomorphic to Each Other or Initial Segments", "Definition:Order Isomorphism/Well-Orderings", "Definition:Order Isomorphism/Well-Orderings", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Order Isomorphism/Well-Orderings", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered...
proofwiki-14502
Addition Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients/Formulation 1
:$\dbinom n m_q = \dbinom {n - 1} m_q + \dbinom {n - 1} {m - 1}_q q^{n - m}$
By definition of Gaussian binomial coefficient: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom n m_q | o = := | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{n - j} } {1 - q^{j + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {1 - q^n} \paren {1 - q^{n - 1} } \dotsm \paren {1 - q^{n - m + 1} } } {\paren {1 - q^m} \pa...
:$\dbinom n m_q = \dbinom {n - 1} m_q + \dbinom {n - 1} {m - 1}_q q^{n - m}$
By definition of [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom n m_q | o = := | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{n - j} } {1 - q^{j + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {1 - q^n} \paren {1 - q^{n - 1} } \dotsm \pare...
Addition Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients/Formulation_1
[ "Addition Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-14503
Addition Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients/Formulation 2
:$\dbinom n m_q = \dbinom {n - 1} m_q q^m + \dbinom {n - 1} {m - 1}_q$
By definition of Gaussian binomial coefficient: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom n m_q | o = := | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{n - j} } {1 - q^{j + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {1 - q^n} \paren {1 - q^{n - 1} } \dotsm \paren {1 - q^{n - m + 1} } } {\paren {1 - q^m} \pa...
:$\dbinom n m_q = \dbinom {n - 1} m_q q^m + \dbinom {n - 1} {m - 1}_q$
By definition of [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom n m_q | o = := | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{n - j} } {1 - q^{j + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\paren {1 - q^n} \paren {1 - q^{n - 1} } \dotsm \pare...
Addition Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients/Formulation 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Addition_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients/Formulation_2
[ "Addition Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-14504
Union of Initial Segments is Initial Segment or All of Woset
Let $\struct {X, \preccurlyeq}$ be a well-ordered non-empty set. Let $A \subseteq X$. Let: :$\ds J = \bigcup_{x \mathop \in A} S_x$ be a union of initial segments defined by the elements of $A$. Then either: :$J = X$ or: :$J$ is an initial segment of $X$.
Suppose the hypotheses of the theorem hold. If $J = X$ then the theorem is satisfied. Assume $J \ne X$. Then $X \setminus J$ is non-empty. By Subset of Well-Ordered Set is Well-Ordered, $X \setminus J$ is itself well-ordered. Thus $X \setminus J$ has a smallest element; call it $b$. We claim that $b \preccurlyeq y$ for...
Let $\struct {X, \preccurlyeq}$ be a [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered]] [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $A \subseteq X$. Let: :$\ds J = \bigcup_{x \mathop \in A} S_x$ be a [[Definition:Union of Family|union]] of [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segments]] defined by ...
Suppose the hypotheses of the theorem hold. If $J = X$ then the theorem is satisfied. Assume $J \ne X$. Then $X \setminus J$ is [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]]. By [[Subset of Well-Ordered Set is Well-Ordered]], $X \setminus J$ is itself [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered]]. Thus $X \setminus J$ has...
Union of Initial Segments is Initial Segment or All of Woset/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Initial_Segments_is_Initial_Segment_or_All_of_Woset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Initial_Segments_is_Initial_Segment_or_All_of_Woset/Proof_1
[ "Well-Orderings", "Union of Initial Segments is Initial Segment or All of Woset" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Union/Family of Sets", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Initial Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Subset of Well-Ordered Set is Well-Ordered", "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Contradiction", "Definition:Strictly Precede", "Definition:Strictly Succeed", "Definition:Initial Segment" ]
proofwiki-14505
Union of Initial Segments is Initial Segment or All of Woset
Let $\struct {X, \preccurlyeq}$ be a well-ordered non-empty set. Let $A \subseteq X$. Let: :$\ds J = \bigcup_{x \mathop \in A} S_x$ be a union of initial segments defined by the elements of $A$. Then either: :$J = X$ or: :$J$ is an initial segment of $X$.
Suppose the hypotheses of the theorem hold. For every $x \in A$, we have $S_x \subseteq X$ by the definition of initial segment. By Union of Family of Subsets is Subset, we have $J \subseteq X$. Consider $X \setminus J$. If $X \setminus J$ is empty, then $X \subseteq J$ by Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set, and...
Let $\struct {X, \preccurlyeq}$ be a [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered]] [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $A \subseteq X$. Let: :$\ds J = \bigcup_{x \mathop \in A} S_x$ be a [[Definition:Union of Family|union]] of [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segments]] defined by ...
Suppose the hypotheses of the theorem hold. For every $x \in A$, we have $S_x \subseteq X$ by the [[Definition:Initial Segment|definition of initial segment]]. By [[Union of Family of Subsets is Subset]], we have $J \subseteq X$. Consider $X \setminus J$. If $X \setminus J$ is [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]], then $...
Union of Initial Segments is Initial Segment or All of Woset/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Initial_Segments_is_Initial_Segment_or_All_of_Woset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_of_Initial_Segments_is_Initial_Segment_or_All_of_Woset/Proof_2
[ "Well-Orderings", "Union of Initial Segments is Initial Segment or All of Woset" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Union/Family of Sets", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Initial Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Initial Segment", "Union of Subsets is Subset/Family of Sets", "Definition:Empty Set", "Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set", "Subset Relation is Antisymmetric", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Subset of Well-Ordered Set is Well-Ordered", "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Sma...
proofwiki-14506
Countable Subset of Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set Has Upper Bound
Let $\Omega$ denote the minimal uncountable well-ordered set. Let $\omega$ be a countable subset of $\Omega$. Then $\omega$ has an upper bound in $\Omega$.
By the minimal uncountable well-ordered set, $\Omega$ is uncountable Then $\omega \ne \Omega$, for the former is countable and the latter is not. Consider the union: :$\ds \bigcup_{x \mathop \in \omega} S_x$ of initial segments $S_x$ in $\omega$. By the definition of $\Omega$, any $S_x$ is countable. Thus $\ds \bigcup_...
Let $\Omega$ denote the [[Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set|minimal uncountable well-ordered set]]. Let $\omega$ be a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $\Omega$. Then $\omega$ has an [[Definition:Upper Bound of Set|upper bound]] in $\Omega$.
By the [[Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set|minimal uncountable well-ordered set]], $\Omega$ is [[Definition:Uncountable|uncountable]] Then $\omega \ne \Omega$, for the former is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] and the latter is not. Consider the [[Definition:Union of Family|union]]: :$\ds \bigcu...
Countable Subset of Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set Has Upper Bound
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Subset_of_Minimal_Uncountable_Well-Ordered_Set_Has_Upper_Bound
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Subset_of_Minimal_Uncountable_Well-Ordered_Set_Has_Upper_Bound
[ "Order Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Upper Bound of Set" ]
[ "Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Uncountable", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Set Union/Family of Sets", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Set Union/Countable Union", "Definition:Countable Set", "Countable Union of Countable ...
proofwiki-14507
Gaussian Binomial Coefficient of 1
:$\dbinom 1 m_q = \delta_{0 m} + \delta_{1 m}$ That is: :$\dbinom 1 m_q = \begin{cases} 1 & : m = 0 \text { or } m = 1 \\0 & : \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$ where $\dbinom 1 m_q$ denotes a Gaussian binomial coefficient.
By definition of Gaussian binomial coefficient: :$\dbinom 1 m_q = \ds \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{1 - k} } {1 - q^{k + 1} }$ When $m = 0$ the continued product on the {{RHS}} is vacuous, and so: :$\dbinom 1 0_q = 1$ Let $m > 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom 1 m_q | r = \prod_{k \mathop...
:$\dbinom 1 m_q = \delta_{0 m} + \delta_{1 m}$ That is: :$\dbinom 1 m_q = \begin{cases} 1 & : m = 0 \text { or } m = 1 \\0 & : \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$ where $\dbinom 1 m_q$ denotes a [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]].
By definition of [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]]: :$\dbinom 1 m_q = \ds \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{m - 1} \dfrac {1 - q^{1 - k} } {1 - q^{k + 1} }$ When $m = 0$ the [[Definition:Continued Product|continued product]] on the {{RHS}} is [[Definition:Vacuous Product|vacuous]], and ...
Gaussian Binomial Coefficient of 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficient_of_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficient_of_1
[ "Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Continued Product", "Definition:Continued Product/Vacuous Product", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Category:Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
proofwiki-14508
Negated Upper Index of Gaussian Binomial Coefficient
:$\dbinom r k_q = \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {k - r - 1} k_q q^{k r - k \paren {k - 1} / 2}$
First note that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 - q^t | r = q^{-t} \dfrac {1 - q^t} {q^{-t} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {q^{-t} - 1} {q^{-t} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = q^t \paren {q^{-t} - 1} | c = }} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = -q^t \paren {1 - q^{-t} } | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin-eqn...
:$\dbinom r k_q = \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {k - r - 1} k_q q^{k r - k \paren {k - 1} / 2}$
First note that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 - q^t | r = q^{-t} \dfrac {1 - q^t} {q^{-t} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {q^{-t} - 1} {q^{-t} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = q^t \paren {q^{-t} - 1} | c = }} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = -q^t \paren {1 - q^{-t} } | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Then: {{begin...
Negated Upper Index of Gaussian Binomial Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Negated_Upper_Index_of_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Negated_Upper_Index_of_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficient
[ "Gaussian Binomial Coefficients", "Negated Upper Index of Binomial Coefficient" ]
[]
[ "Permutation of Indices of Product", "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers" ]
proofwiki-14509
Chu-Vandermonde Identity for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom {r + s} n_q | r = \sum_k \binom r k_q \binom s {n - k}_q q^{\paren {r - k} \paren {n - k} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom r k_q \binom s {n - k}_q q^{\paren {s - n + k} k} | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{n \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom {r + s} n_q q^{n \paren {n - 1} / 2} x^n | r = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^{r + s} \paren {1 + q^{k - 1} x} | c = Gaussian Binomial Theorem }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^r \paren {1 + q^{k - 1} x} \prod_{k \mathop = r + 1}^s \paren {1 + q^{k - 1} x}...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom {r + s} n_q | r = \sum_k \binom r k_q \binom s {n - k}_q q^{\paren {r - k} \paren {n - k} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_k \binom r k_q \binom s {n - k}_q q^{\paren {s - n + k} k} | c = }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{n \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom {r + s} n_q q^{n \paren {n - 1} / 2} x^n | r = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^{r + s} \paren {1 + q^{k - 1} x} | c = [[Gaussian Binomial Theorem]] }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^r \paren {1 + q^{k - 1} x} \prod_{k \mathop = r + 1}^s \paren {1 + q^{k - 1...
Chu-Vandermonde Identity for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Chu-Vandermonde_Identity_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Chu-Vandermonde_Identity_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients
[ "Chu-Vandermonde Identity", "Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Gaussian Binomial Theorem", "Translation of Index Variable of Product" ]
proofwiki-14510
Symmetry Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients
Let $q \in \R_{\ne 1}, n \in \Z_{>0}, k \in \Z$. Then: :$\dbinom n k_q = \dbinom n {n - k}_q$ where $\dbinom n k_q$ is a Gaussian binomial coefficient.
If $k < 0$ then $n - k > n$. Similarly, if $k > n$, then $n - k < 0$. In both cases: :$\dbinom n k_q = \dbinom n {n - k}_q = 0$ {{explain|While we do indeed know that $\dbinom n k {{=}} 0$ for $k < 0$ and $k > n$, we haven't demonstrated anywhere that this still holds for $\dbinom n k_q$.}} Let $0 \le k \le n$. Conside...
Let $q \in \R_{\ne 1}, n \in \Z_{>0}, k \in \Z$. Then: :$\dbinom n k_q = \dbinom n {n - k}_q$ where $\dbinom n k_q$ is a [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]].
If $k < 0$ then $n - k > n$. Similarly, if $k > n$, then $n - k < 0$. In both cases: :$\dbinom n k_q = \dbinom n {n - k}_q = 0$ {{explain|While we do indeed know that $\dbinom n k {{=}} 0$ for $k < 0$ and $k > n$, we haven't demonstrated anywhere that this still holds for $\dbinom n k_q$.}} Let $0 \le k \le n$. ...
Symmetry Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetry_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetry_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients
[ "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients", "Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient" ]
[]
proofwiki-14511
Reflection Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients
Let $q \in \R_{\ne 1}, n \in \Z_{>0}, k \in \Z$. Then: :$\dbinom n k_q = q^{k \paren {n - k} } \dbinom n k_{q^{-1} }$ where $\dbinom n k_q$ is a Gaussian binomial coefficient.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n k_{q^{-1} } | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \dfrac {1 - \paren {q^{-1} }^{n - j} } {1 - \paren {q^{-1} }^{j + 1} } | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \dfrac {\frac {q^{n - j} - 1} {q^{n - j} } } {\frac {q^{j + 1}...
Let $q \in \R_{\ne 1}, n \in \Z_{>0}, k \in \Z$. Then: :$\dbinom n k_q = q^{k \paren {n - k} } \dbinom n k_{q^{-1} }$ where $\dbinom n k_q$ is a [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n k_{q^{-1} } | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \dfrac {1 - \paren {q^{-1} }^{n - j} } {1 - \paren {q^{-1} }^{j + 1} } | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | r = \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \dfrac {\frac {q^{n - j} - 1} {q^{n - j} } } {\frac {q^{j + 1}...
Reflection Rule for Gaussian Binomial Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reflection_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reflection_Rule_for_Gaussian_Binomial_Coefficients
[ "Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Closed Form for Triangular Numbers" ]
proofwiki-14512
Gaussian Binomial Theorem/Real Numbers
Let $r \in \R$ be a real number. :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom r k_q q^{k \paren {k - 1} / 2} x^k = \prod_{k \mathop \ge 0} \dfrac {1 + q^k x} {1 + q^{r + k} x}$ where: :$\dbinom r k_q$ denotes a Gaussian binomial coefficient :$x \in \R: \size x < 1$ :$q \in \R: \size q < 1$.
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Carl Friedrich Gauss}}
Let $r \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom r k_q q^{k \paren {k - 1} / 2} x^k = \prod_{k \mathop \ge 0} \dfrac {1 + q^k x} {1 + q^{r + k} x}$ where: :$\dbinom r k_q$ denotes a [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]] :$x \in \R: ...
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Carl Friedrich Gauss}}
Gaussian Binomial Theorem/Real Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Binomial_Theorem/Real_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Binomial_Theorem/Real_Numbers
[ "Gaussian Binomial Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient" ]
[]
proofwiki-14513
Gaussian Binomial Theorem/Negation of Upper Index
Let $r \in \R$ be a real number. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \prod_{k \mathop \ge 0} \dfrac {1 + q^{k + r + 1} x} {1 + q^k x} | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom {-r - 1} k_q q^{k \left({k - 1}\right) / 2} \left({-q^{r + 1} x}\right)^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom {k + r} x^k ...
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Carl Friedrich Gauss}}
Let $r \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \prod_{k \mathop \ge 0} \dfrac {1 + q^{k + r + 1} x} {1 + q^k x} | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom {-r - 1} k_q q^{k \left({k - 1}\right) / 2} \left({-q^{r + 1} x}\right)^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \...
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Carl Friedrich Gauss}}
Gaussian Binomial Theorem/Negation of Upper Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Binomial_Theorem/Negation_of_Upper_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Binomial_Theorem/Negation_of_Upper_Index
[ "Gaussian Binomial Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient" ]
[]
proofwiki-14514
Binomial Coefficient n Choose k by n Plus 1 Minus n Choose k + 1
Let $\sequence {A_{n k} }$ be a sequence defined on $n, k \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ as: :$A_{n k} = \begin{cases} 1 & : k = 0 \\ 0 & : k \ne 0, n = 0 \\ A_{\paren {n - 1} k} + A_{\paren {n - 1} \paren {k - 1} } + \dbinom n k & : \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$ Then the closed form for $A_{n k}$ is given as: :$A_{n k} = \paren {n +...
The proof proceeds by induction on $n$. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$A_{n k} = \paren {n + 1} \dbinom n k - \dbinom n {k + 1} + \dbinom n k$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case $A_{0 k}$: Let $k = 0$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A_{0 k} | r = 1 | c ...
Let $\sequence {A_{n k} }$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] defined on $n, k \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ as: :$A_{n k} = \begin{cases} 1 & : k = 0 \\ 0 & : k \ne 0, n = 0 \\ A_{\paren {n - 1} k} + A_{\paren {n - 1} \paren {k - 1} } + \dbinom n k & : \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$ Then the closed form for $A_{n k}$ is given ...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $n$. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$A_{n k} = \paren {n + 1} \dbinom n k - \dbinom n {k + 1} + \dbinom n k$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 0$ is the case $A_{0 k}$: Let $...
Binomial Coefficient n Choose k by n Plus 1 Minus n Choose k + 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_n_Choose_k_by_n_Plus_1_Minus_n_Choose_k_+_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_n_Choose_k_by_n_Plus_1_Minus_n_Choose_k_+_1
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Zero Choose n", "Zero Choose n", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Binomial Coefficient n Choose k by n Plus 1 Minus n Choose k + 1", "Pascal's Rule", "Principle o...
proofwiki-14515
Cardinality of Set of Combinations with Repetition
Let $S$ be a finite set with $n$ elements The number of $k$-combinations of $S$ with repetition is given by: :$N = \dbinom {n + k - 1} k$
Let the elements of $S$ be (totally) ordered in some way, by assigning an index to each element. Thus let $S = \left\{ {a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots, a_n}\right\}$. Thus each $k$-combination of $S$ with repetition can be expressed as: :$\left\{ {\left\{ {a_{r_1}, a_{r_1}, \ldots, a_{r_k} }\right\} }\right\}$ where: :$r_1, r_2...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]] with $n$ [[Definition:Element|elements]] The number of [[Definition:Combination with Repetition|$k$-combinations of $S$ with repetition]] is given by: :$N = \dbinom {n + k - 1} k$
Let the [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $S$ be [[Definition:Total Ordering|(totally) ordered]] in some way, by assigning an [[Definition:Index (Indexing Set)|index]] to each [[Definition:Element|element]]. Thus let $S = \left\{ {a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots, a_n}\right\}$. Thus each [[Definition:Combination with Repetiti...
Cardinality of Set of Combinations with Repetition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_of_Combinations_with_Repetition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Set_of_Combinations_with_Repetition
[ "Combinations with Repetition" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Combination with Repetition" ]
[ "Definition:Element", "Definition:Total Ordering", "Definition:Indexing Set/Index", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Combination with Repetition", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Cardinality of Set...
proofwiki-14516
Sum over k of Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of n+1 with k+1 by Stirling Number of the Second Kind of k with m by -1^k-m
Let $m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. :$\ds \sum_k {n + 1 \brack k + 1} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{k - m} = \sqbrk {n \ge m} \dfrac {n!} {m!}$ where: :$\sqbrk {n \ge m}$ is Iverson's convention :$\ds {n + 1 \brack k + 1}$ denotes an unsigned Stirling number of the first kind :$\ds {k \brace m}$ denotes a Stirling number of the sec...
The proof proceeds by induction on $n$. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \sum_k {n + 1 \brack k + 1} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{k - m} = \sqbrk {n \ge m} \dfrac {n!} {m!}$
Let $m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. :$\ds \sum_k {n + 1 \brack k + 1} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{k - m} = \sqbrk {n \ge m} \dfrac {n!} {m!}$ where: :$\sqbrk {n \ge m}$ is [[Definition:Iverson's Convention|Iverson's convention]] :$\ds {n + 1 \brack k + 1}$ denotes an [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|unsig...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] on $n$. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \sum_k {n + 1 \brack k + 1} {k \brace m} \paren {-1}^{k - m} = \sqbrk {n \ge m} \dfrac {n!} {m!}$
Sum over k of Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of n+1 with k+1 by Stirling Number of the Second Kind of k with m by -1^k-m
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_n+1_with_k+1_by_Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_k_with_m_by_-1^k-m
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_the_First_Kind_of_n+1_with_k+1_by_Stirling_Number_of_the_Second_Kind_of_k_with_m_by_-1^k-m
[ "Stirling Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Iverson's Convention", "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned", "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-14517
Dixon's Identity/General Case
For $l, m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {l + m} {l + k} \dbinom {m + n} {m + k} \dbinom {n + l} {n + k} = \dfrac {\paren {l + m + n}!} {l! \, m! \, n!}$
From Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {m - r + s} k$ by $\dbinom {n + r - s} {n - k}$ by $\dbinom {r + k} {m + n}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom {m - r + s} k \binom {n + r - s} {n - k} \binom {r + k} {m + n} = \binom r m \binom s n$ Setting $\tuple {m, n, r, s, k} \gets \tuple {m + k, l - k, m + n, n + l, j}$ into the...
For $l, m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {l + m} {l + k} \dbinom {m + n} {m + k} \dbinom {n + l} {n + k} = \dfrac {\paren {l + m + n}!} {l! \, m! \, n!}$
From [[Sum over k of m+r+s Choose k by n+r-s Choose n-k by r+k Choose m+n|Sum over $k$ of $\dbinom {m - r + s} k$ by $\dbinom {n + r - s} {n - k}$ by $\dbinom {r + k} {m + n}$]]: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom {m - r + s} k \binom {n + r - s} {n - k} \binom {r + k} {m + n} = \binom r m \binom s n$ Setting $\tu...
Dixon's Identity/General Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity/General_Case
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity/General_Case
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Sum over k of m+r+s Choose k by n+r-s Choose n-k by r+k Choose m+n", "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients" ]
proofwiki-14518
Dixon's Identity
For $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \binom {2 n} {n + k}^3 = \dfrac {\paren {3 n}!} {\paren {n!}^3}$
Follows directly from Dixon's Identity/General Case: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {l + m} {l + k} \dbinom {m + n} {m + k} \dbinom {n + l} {n + k} = \dfrac {\paren {l + m + n}!} {l! \, m! \, n!}$ setting $l = m = n$. {{qed}} {{Namedfor|Alfred Cardew Dixon|cat = Dixon, A.C.}}
For $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \binom {2 n} {n + k}^3 = \dfrac {\paren {3 n}!} {\paren {n!}^3}$
Follows directly from [[Dixon's Identity/General Case]]: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {l + m} {l + k} \dbinom {m + n} {m + k} \dbinom {n + l} {n + k} = \dfrac {\paren {l + m + n}!} {l! \, m! \, n!}$ setting $l = m = n$. {{qed}} {{Namedfor|Alfred Cardew Dixon|cat = Dixon, A.C.}}
Dixon's Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Dixon's Identity/General Case" ]
proofwiki-14519
Dixon's Identity/Gaussian Binomial Form/Formulation 2
For $l, m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {l + m} {l + k}_q \dbinom {m + n} {m + k}_q \dbinom {n + l} {n + k}_q = \dfrac {\paren {l + m + n}!_q} {l!_q \, m!_q \, n!_q}$ where: :$\dbinom {l + m} {l + k}_q$ denotes a Gaussian binomial coefficient :$l!_q$ is defined as $\ds \prod_{k...
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Alfred Cardew Dixon}}
For $l, m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {l + m} {l + k}_q \dbinom {m + n} {m + k}_q \dbinom {n + l} {n + k}_q = \dfrac {\paren {l + m + n}!_q} {l!_q \, m!_q \, n!_q}$ where: :$\dbinom {l + m} {l + k}_q$ denotes a [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial co...
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Alfred Cardew Dixon}}
Dixon's Identity/Gaussian Binomial Form/Formulation 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity/Gaussian_Binomial_Form/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity/Gaussian_Binomial_Form/Formulation_2
[ "Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient" ]
[]
proofwiki-14520
Dixon's Identity/Gaussian Binomial Form/Formulation 1
For $l, m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {m - r - s} k_q \dbinom {n + r - s} {n - k}_q \dbinom {r + k} {m + n}_q = \dbinom r m_q \dbinom s n_q$ where $\dbinom r m_q$ denotes a Gaussian binomial coefficient
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Alfred Cardew Dixon}}
For $l, m, n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {-1}^k \dbinom {m - r - s} k_q \dbinom {n + r - s} {n - k}_q \dbinom {r + k} {m + n}_q = \dbinom r m_q \dbinom s n_q$ where $\dbinom r m_q$ denotes a [[Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient|Gaussian binomial coefficient]]
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Alfred Cardew Dixon}}
Dixon's Identity/Gaussian Binomial Form/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity/Gaussian_Binomial_Form/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dixon's_Identity/Gaussian_Binomial_Form/Formulation_1
[ "Gaussian Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Gaussian Binomial Coefficient" ]
[]
proofwiki-14521
Analytic Continuation of Generating Function of Dirichlet Series
Let $\ds \map \lambda s = \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {a_n} {n^s}$ be a Dirichlet series Let $c \in \R$ be greater than the abscissa of absolute convergence of $\lambda$ and greater than $0$. Let $\ds \map g z = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\infty \map \lambda {c k} z^k $ be the generating function of $\map \lambda {c k...
We will first show that the series is meromorphic functions on $\C$ with simple poles at $n^c$. For $\cmod z < R$, pick $M$ such that: :$M^c > 2 R$ This is always possible, as: :$c > 0$ Then for $n > M$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cmod {1 - \frac z {n^c} } | o = > | r = 1 - \cmod {\frac z {n^c} } | c...
Let $\ds \map \lambda s = \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {a_n} {n^s}$ be a [[Definition:Dirichlet Series|Dirichlet series]] Let $c \in \R$ be greater than the [[Existence of Abscissa of Absolute Convergence|abscissa of absolute convergence]] of $\lambda$ and greater than $0$. Let $\ds \map g z = \sum_{k \mathop =...
We will first show that the [[Definition:Series|series]] is [[Definition:Meromorphic Function|meromorphic functions]] on $\C$ with [[Definition:Simple Pole|simple poles]] at $n^c$. For $\cmod z < R$, pick $M$ such that: :$M^c > 2 R$ This is always possible, as: :$c > 0$ Then for $n > M$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = ...
Analytic Continuation of Generating Function of Dirichlet Series
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Analytic_Continuation_of_Generating_Function_of_Dirichlet_Series
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Analytic_Continuation_of_Generating_Function_of_Dirichlet_Series
[ "Dirichlet Series" ]
[ "Definition:Dirichlet Series", "Existence of Abscissa of Absolute Convergence", "Definition:Generating Function", "Definition:Analytic Continuation" ]
[ "Definition:Series", "Definition:Meromorphic Function", "Definition:Order of Pole/Simple Pole", "Triangle Inequality", "Existence of Abscissa of Absolute Convergence", "Definition:Series", "Definition:Convergent Series/Number Field", "Definition:Addition/Summand", "Definition:Meromorphic Function", ...
proofwiki-14522
Uniqueness of Real z such that x Choose n+1 Equals y Choose n+1 Plus z Choose n
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a positive integer. Let $x, y \in \R$ be real numbers which satisfy: :$n \le y \le x \le y + 1$ Then there exists a unique real number $z$ such that: :$\dbinom x {n + 1} = \dbinom y {n + 1} + \dbinom z n$ where $n - 1 \le z \le y$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom y {n + 1} | o = \le | r = \dbinom x {n + 1} | c = Ordering of Binomial Coefficients }} {{eqn | o = \le | r = \dbinom {y + 1} {n + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dbinom y {n + 1} + \dbinom y n | c = Pascal's Rule }} {{end-eqn}} {{finish}}
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Let $x, y \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] which satisfy: :$n \le y \le x \le y + 1$ Then there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] $z$ such that: :$\dbinom x {n + 1} = \dbinom y ...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom y {n + 1} | o = \le | r = \dbinom x {n + 1} | c = [[Ordering of Binomial Coefficients]] }} {{eqn | o = \le | r = \dbinom {y + 1} {n + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dbinom y {n + 1} + \dbinom y n | c = [[Pascal's Rule]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{finish}}
Uniqueness of Real z such that x Choose n+1 Equals y Choose n+1 Plus z Choose n
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Uniqueness_of_Real_z_such_that_x_Choose_n+1_Equals_y_Choose_n+1_Plus_z_Choose_n
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Uniqueness_of_Real_z_such_that_x_Choose_n+1_Equals_y_Choose_n+1_Plus_z_Choose_n
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Real Number" ]
[ "Ordering of Binomial Coefficients", "Pascal's Rule" ]
proofwiki-14523
X Choose n leq y Choose n + z Choose n-1 where n leq y leq x leq y+1 and n-1 leq z leq y
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a positive integer. Let $x, y \in \R$ be real numbers which satisfy: :$n \le y \le x \le y + 1$ Let $z$ be the unique real number $z$ such that: :$\dbinom x {n + 1} = \dbinom y {n + 1} + \dbinom z n$ where $n - 1 \le z \le y$. Its uniqueness is proved at Uniqueness of Real $z$ such that $\dbin...
If $z \ge n$, then from Ordering of Binomial Coefficients: :$\dbinom z {n + 1} \le \dbinom y {n + 1}$ Otherwise $n - 1 \le z \le n$, and: :$\dbinom z {n + 1} \le 0 \le \dbinom y {n + 1}$ In either case: :$(1): \quad \dbinom z {n + 1} \le \dbinom y {n + 1}$ Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom {z + 1} {n + 1} ...
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Let $x, y \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] which satisfy: :$n \le y \le x \le y + 1$ Let $z$ be the [[Definition:Unique|unique]] [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] $z$ such that: :$\dbinom x {n + 1} = \dbinom y {n + ...
If $z \ge n$, then from [[Ordering of Binomial Coefficients]]: :$\dbinom z {n + 1} \le \dbinom y {n + 1}$ Otherwise $n - 1 \le z \le n$, and: :$\dbinom z {n + 1} \le 0 \le \dbinom y {n + 1}$ In either case: :$(1): \quad \dbinom z {n + 1} \le \dbinom y {n + 1}$ Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom {z + 1...
X Choose n leq y Choose n + z Choose n-1 where n leq y leq x leq y+1 and n-1 leq z leq y
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/X_Choose_n_leq_y_Choose_n_+_z_Choose_n-1_where_n_leq_y_leq_x_leq_y+1_and_n-1_leq_z_leq_y
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/X_Choose_n_leq_y_Choose_n_+_z_Choose_n-1_where_n_leq_y_leq_x_leq_y+1_and_n-1_leq_z_leq_y
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Real Number", "Uniqueness of Real z such that x Choose n+1 Equals y Choose n+1 Plus z Choose n" ]
[ "Ordering of Binomial Coefficients", "Pascal's Rule", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Negative/Integer", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Kronecker Delta",...
proofwiki-14524
Upper Bound for Binomial Coefficient
Let $n, k \in \Z$ such that $n \ge k \ge 0$. Then: :$\dbinom n k \le \left({\dfrac {n e} k}\right)^k$ where $\dbinom n k$ denotes a binomial coefficient.
From Lower and Upper Bound of Factorial, we have that: :$\dfrac {k^k} {e^{k - 1} } \le k!$ so that: :$(1): \quad \dfrac 1 {k!} \le \dfrac {e^{k - 1} } {k^k}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n k | r = \dfrac {n^\underline k} {k!} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | o = \le | r = \df...
Let $n, k \in \Z$ such that $n \ge k \ge 0$. Then: :$\dbinom n k \le \left({\dfrac {n e} k}\right)^k$ where $\dbinom n k$ denotes a [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]].
From [[Lower and Upper Bound of Factorial]], we have that: :$\dfrac {k^k} {e^{k - 1} } \le k!$ so that: :$(1): \quad \dfrac 1 {k!} \le \dfrac {e^{k - 1} } {k^k}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n k | r = \dfrac {n^\underline k} {k!} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | o = \le ...
Upper Bound for Binomial Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_Bound_for_Binomial_Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_Bound_for_Binomial_Coefficient
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Lower and Upper Bound of Factorial" ]
proofwiki-14525
Lower Bound for Binomial Coefficient
Let $n, k \in \Z$ such that $n \ge k \ge 0$. Then: :$\dbinom n k \ge \paren {\dfrac {\paren {n - k} e} k}^k \dfrac 1 {e k}$ where $\dbinom n k$ denotes a binomial coefficient.
From Lower and Upper Bound of Factorial, we have that: :$k! \le \dfrac {k^{k + 1} } {e^{k - 1} }$ so that: :$(1): \quad \dfrac 1 {k!} \ge \dfrac {e^{k - 1} } {k^{k + 1} }$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n k | r = \dfrac {n^\underline k} {k!} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | o = \ge ...
Let $n, k \in \Z$ such that $n \ge k \ge 0$. Then: :$\dbinom n k \ge \paren {\dfrac {\paren {n - k} e} k}^k \dfrac 1 {e k}$ where $\dbinom n k$ denotes a [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]].
From [[Lower and Upper Bound of Factorial]], we have that: :$k! \le \dfrac {k^{k + 1} } {e^{k - 1} }$ so that: :$(1): \quad \dfrac 1 {k!} \ge \dfrac {e^{k - 1} } {k^{k + 1} }$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dbinom n k | r = \dfrac {n^\underline k} {k!} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | ...
Lower Bound for Binomial Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lower_Bound_for_Binomial_Coefficient
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lower_Bound_for_Binomial_Coefficient
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Lower and Upper Bound of Factorial" ]
proofwiki-14526
Sum over k of n Choose k by p^k by (1-p)^n-k by Absolute Value of k-np
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a non-negative integer. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n - k} \size {k - n p} = 2 \ceiling {n p} \dbinom n {\ceiling {n p} } p^{\ceiling {n p} } \paren {1 - p}^{n - 1 - \ceiling {n p} }$
Let $t_k = k \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n + 1 - k}$. Then: :$t_k - t_{k + 1} = \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n - k} \paren {k - n p}$ Thus the stated summation is: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop < \ceiling {n p} } \paren {t_{k + 1} - t_k} + \sum_{k \mathop \ge \ceiling {n p} } \paren {t_k - t_{k + 1} } = 2 t_{\ceiling {n...
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ be a [[Definition:Non-Negative Integer|non-negative integer]]. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n - k} \size {k - n p} = 2 \ceiling {n p} \dbinom n {\ceiling {n p} } p^{\ceiling {n p} } \paren {1 - p}^{n - 1 - \ceiling {n p} }$
Let $t_k = k \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n + 1 - k}$. Then: :$t_k - t_{k + 1} = \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n - k} \paren {k - n p}$ Thus the stated summation is: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop < \ceiling {n p} } \paren {t_{k + 1} - t_k} + \sum_{k \mathop \ge \ceiling {n p} } \paren {t_k - t_{k + 1} } = 2 t_{\ceiling...
Sum over k of n Choose k by p^k by (1-p)^n-k by Absolute Value of k-np
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n_Choose_k_by_p^k_by_(1-p)^n-k_by_Absolute_Value_of_k-np
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n_Choose_k_by_p^k_by_(1-p)^n-k_by_Absolute_Value_of_k-np
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
[]
proofwiki-14527
Sequence of General Harmonic Numbers Converges for Index Greater than 1
Let $\map {H^{\paren r} } n$ denote the general harmonic number: :$\ds \map {H^{\paren r} } n = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \frac 1 {k^r}$ for $r \in \R_{>0}$. Let $r > 1$. Then as $n \to \infty$, $\map {H^{\paren r} } n$ is convergent with an upper bound of $\dfrac {2^{r - 1} } {2^{r - 1} - 1}$.
Let $m \in \N$ be arbitrary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \harm r {2^{m - 1} } | r = \harm r {2^{m - 1} - 1} + \dfrac 1 {\paren {2^{m - 1} }^r} + \dfrac 1 {\paren {2^{m - 1} + 1}^r} + \cdots + \dfrac 1 {\paren {2^{m - 1} + \paren {2^{m - 1} - 1} }^r} | c = }} {{eqn | o = < | r = \harm r {2^{m - 1}...
Let $\map {H^{\paren r} } n$ denote the [[Definition:General Harmonic Numbers|general harmonic number]]: :$\ds \map {H^{\paren r} } n = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \frac 1 {k^r}$ for $r \in \R_{>0}$. Let $r > 1$. Then as $n \to \infty$, $\map {H^{\paren r} } n$ is [[Definition:Convergent Series of Numbers|convergent]] w...
Let $m \in \N$ be arbitrary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \harm r {2^{m - 1} } | r = \harm r {2^{m - 1} - 1} + \dfrac 1 {\paren {2^{m - 1} }^r} + \dfrac 1 {\paren {2^{m - 1} + 1}^r} + \cdots + \dfrac 1 {\paren {2^{m - 1} + \paren {2^{m - 1} - 1} }^r} | c = }} {{eqn | o = < | r = \harm r {2^{m - ...
Sequence of General Harmonic Numbers Converges for Index Greater than 1/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_General_Harmonic_Numbers_Converges_for_Index_Greater_than_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_General_Harmonic_Numbers_Converges_for_Index_Greater_than_1/Proof
[ "Sequence of General Harmonic Numbers Converges for Index Greater than 1", "General Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers/General Definition", "Definition:Convergent Series/Number Field", "Definition:Upper Bound" ]
[ "Ordering of Reciprocals", "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Definition:Series/Sequence of Partial Sums", "Monotone Convergence Theorem (Real Analysis)", "Definition:Convergent Series/Number Field", "Definition:Upper Bound" ]
proofwiki-14528
Inductive Construction of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets
Let $\EE$ be a set of sets which are subsets of some set $X$. Let $\map \sigma \EE$ be the $\sigma$-algebra generated by $\EE$. Then $\map \sigma \EE$ can be constructed inductively. The construction is as follows: Let $\Omega$ denote the minimal uncountable well-ordered set. Let $\alpha$ be an arbitrary initial segme...
=== Step 1 === We will show that: :$\map \sigma \EE \subseteq \EE_\Omega$. Define: :$\OO := \set {o \in \Omega: \EE_o \in \map \sigma \EE}$ By the definition of a $\sigma$-algebra: :$\EE_1 \subseteq \map \sigma \EE$. From $\sigma$-Algebra of Countable Sets, if $\beta$ immediately precedes $\alpha$, then $\EE_\alpha$ i...
Let $\EE$ be a [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of sets]] which are [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of some [[Definition:Set|set]] $X$. Let $\map \sigma \EE$ be the [[Definition:Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets|$\sigma$-algebra generated by $\EE$]]. Then $\map \sigma \EE$ can be constructed [[Induction on...
=== Step 1 === We will show that: :$\map \sigma \EE \subseteq \EE_\Omega$. Define: :$\OO := \set {o \in \Omega: \EE_o \in \map \sigma \EE}$ By the [[Definition:Sigma-Algebra|definition of a $\sigma$-algebra]]: :$\EE_1 \subseteq \map \sigma \EE$. From [[Sigma-Algebra of Countable Sets|$\sigma$-Algebra of Countabl...
Inductive Construction of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inductive_Construction_of_Sigma-Algebra_Generated_by_Collection_of_Subsets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inductive_Construction_of_Sigma-Algebra_Generated_by_Collection_of_Subsets
[ "Sigma-Algebras" ]
[ "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Subsets", "Principle of Mathematical Induction/Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Minimal Uncountable Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordinal/Definition 3", "Definition:Immediate Predecesso...
[ "Definition:Sigma-Algebra", "Sigma-Algebra of Countable Sets", "Definition:Immediate Predecessor Element", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra", "Definition:Strictly Precede", "Definition:Set Union/Countable Union", "Definition:Measurable Set", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra", "Definition:Set Union/Family of Sets"...
proofwiki-14529
Generating Function for Bernoulli Polynomials
Let $\map {B_n} x$ denote the $n$th Bernoulli polynomial. Then the generating function for $B_n$ is: :$\ds \frac {t e^{t x} } {e^t - 1} = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\map {B_k} x} {k!} t^k$
By definition of the generating function for Bernoulli numbers: :$\ds \frac t {e^t - 1} = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {B_k} {k!} t^k$ By Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function: :$\ds e^{t x} = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {x^k} {k!} t^k$ Thus: :$\ds \frac {t e^{t x} } {e^t - 1} = \paren {\sum_{k \ma...
Let $\map {B_n} x$ denote the $n$th [[Definition:Bernoulli Polynomial|Bernoulli polynomial]]. Then the [[Definition:Generating Function|generating function]] for $B_n$ is: :$\ds \frac {t e^{t x} } {e^t - 1} = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\map {B_k} x} {k!} t^k$
By definition of the [[Definition:Bernoulli Numbers/Generating Function|generating function for Bernoulli numbers]]: :$\ds \frac t {e^t - 1} = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {B_k} {k!} t^k$ By [[Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function]]: :$\ds e^{t x} = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {x^k} {k!} t^k$ ...
Generating Function for Bernoulli Polynomials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Generating_Function_for_Bernoulli_Polynomials
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Generating_Function_for_Bernoulli_Polynomials
[ "Bernoulli Polynomials", "Examples of Generating Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Bernoulli Polynomial", "Definition:Generating Function" ]
[ "Definition:Bernoulli Numbers/Generating Function", "Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function", "Category:Bernoulli Polynomials", "Category:Examples of Generating Functions" ]
proofwiki-14530
Symmetry of Bernoulli Polynomial
Let $\map {B_n} x$ denote the nth Bernoulli polynomial. Then: :$\map {B_n} {1 - x} = \paren {-1}^n \map {B_n} x$
Let $\map G {t, x}$ denote the Generating Function for Bernoulli Polynomials: :$\map G {t, x} = \dfrac {t e^{t x} } {e^t - 1}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map G {t, 1 - x} | r = \frac {t e^{t \paren {1 - x} } } {e^t - 1} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {t e^{t - t x} } {e^t - 1} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {t e^{-t x} } {1 - ...
Let $\map {B_n} x$ denote the nth [[Definition:Bernoulli Polynomial|Bernoulli polynomial]]. Then: :$\map {B_n} {1 - x} = \paren {-1}^n \map {B_n} x$
Let $\map G {t, x}$ denote the [[Generating Function for Bernoulli Polynomials]]: :$\map G {t, x} = \dfrac {t e^{t x} } {e^t - 1}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map G {t, 1 - x} | r = \frac {t e^{t \paren {1 - x} } } {e^t - 1} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {t e^{t - t x} } {e^t - 1} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {t e^{-t x} ...
Symmetry of Bernoulli Polynomial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetry_of_Bernoulli_Polynomial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetry_of_Bernoulli_Polynomial
[ "Bernoulli Polynomials" ]
[ "Definition:Bernoulli Polynomial" ]
[ "Generating Function for Bernoulli Polynomials", "Category:Bernoulli Polynomials" ]
proofwiki-14531
Value of Odd Bernoulli Polynomial at One Half
Let $\map {B_n} x$ denote the $n$th Bernoulli polynomial. Then: :$\map {B_{2 n + 1} } {\dfrac 1 2} = 0$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {B_{2 n + 1} } {1 - x} | r = \paren {-1}^{2 n + 1} \map {B_{2 n + 1} } x | c = Symmetry of Bernoulli Polynomial }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-1} \map {B_{2 n + 1} } x }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map {B_{2 n + 1} } {\frac 1 2} | r = \paren {-1} \map {B_{2 n + 1} } {\fr...
Let $\map {B_n} x$ denote the $n$th [[Definition:Bernoulli Polynomial|Bernoulli polynomial]]. Then: :$\map {B_{2 n + 1} } {\dfrac 1 2} = 0$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {B_{2 n + 1} } {1 - x} | r = \paren {-1}^{2 n + 1} \map {B_{2 n + 1} } x | c = [[Symmetry of Bernoulli Polynomial]] }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-1} \map {B_{2 n + 1} } x }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map {B_{2 n + 1} } {\frac 1 2} | r = \paren {-1} \map {B_{2 n + 1} } ...
Value of Odd Bernoulli Polynomial at One Half
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Odd_Bernoulli_Polynomial_at_One_Half
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Value_of_Odd_Bernoulli_Polynomial_at_One_Half
[ "Bernoulli Polynomials" ]
[ "Definition:Bernoulli Polynomial" ]
[ "Symmetry of Bernoulli Polynomial", "Category:Bernoulli Polynomials" ]
proofwiki-14532
Harmonic Number is Greater than Logarithm plus Gamma
:$H_n > \ln n + \gamma$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number :$\gamma$ denotes the Euler-Mascheroni constant.
From Approximate Size of Sum of Harmonic Series: :$H_n \approx \ln n + \gamma + \dfrac 1 {2 n} - \dfrac 1 {12 n^2} + \dfrac 1 {120 n^4} - \epsilon$ where $0 < \epsilon < \dfrac 1 {252 n^6}$. We have that: :$\dfrac 1 {2 n} + \dfrac 1 {120 n^4} > \dfrac 1 {12 n^2} + \dfrac 1 {252 n^6}$ and the result follows. {{qed}}
:$H_n > \ln n + \gamma$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$\gamma$ denotes the [[Definition:Euler-Mascheroni Constant|Euler-Mascheroni constant]].
From [[Approximate Size of Sum of Harmonic Series]]: :$H_n \approx \ln n + \gamma + \dfrac 1 {2 n} - \dfrac 1 {12 n^2} + \dfrac 1 {120 n^4} - \epsilon$ where $0 < \epsilon < \dfrac 1 {252 n^6}$. We have that: :$\dfrac 1 {2 n} + \dfrac 1 {120 n^4} > \dfrac 1 {12 n^2} + \dfrac 1 {252 n^6}$ and the result follows. {{...
Harmonic Number is Greater than Logarithm plus Gamma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Harmonic_Number_is_Greater_than_Logarithm_plus_Gamma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Harmonic_Number_is_Greater_than_Logarithm_plus_Gamma
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Euler-Mascheroni Constant" ]
[ "Approximate Size of Sum of Harmonic Series" ]
proofwiki-14533
Summation to n of Power of k over k
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k = H_n + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dbinom n k \dfrac {\paren {x - 1}^k} k$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number :$\dbinom n k$ denotes a binomial coefficient.
The proof proceeds by induction over $n$. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 1}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k = H_n + \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dbinom n k \dfrac {\paren {x - 1}^k} k$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 1$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \math...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k = H_n + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dbinom n k \dfrac {\paren {x - 1}^k} k$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$\dbinom n k$ denotes a [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]].
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]] over $n$. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 1}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k = H_n + \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dbinom n k \dfrac {\paren {x - 1}^k} k$ === Basis for the Inducti...
Summation to n of Power of k over k/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Power_of_k_over_k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Power_of_k_over_k/Proof_1
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "Binomial Coefficients", "Summation to n of Power of k over k" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Binomial Coefficient with Self", "Harmonic Numbers/Examples/H1", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Summation to n of Power of k over k/Proof 1", "Pascal's Rule", "...
proofwiki-14534
Summation to n of Power of k over k
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k = H_n + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dbinom n k \dfrac {\paren {x - 1}^k} k$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number :$\dbinom n k$ denotes a binomial coefficient.
Differentiating {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac \d {\d x} \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n\dfrac \d {\d x}\paren {\dfrac {x^k} k} | c = Applications of Linear Combination of Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k \dfrac {x...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k = H_n + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dbinom n k \dfrac {\paren {x - 1}^k} k$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$\dbinom n k$ denotes a [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient|binomial coefficient]].
[[Definition:Differentiation|Differentiating]] {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac \d {\d x} \paren {\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {x^k} k} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n\dfrac \d {\d x}\paren {\dfrac {x^k} k} | c = Applications of [[Linear Combination of Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r ...
Summation to n of Power of k over k/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Power_of_k_over_k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Power_of_k_over_k/Proof_2
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "Binomial Coefficients", "Summation to n of Power of k over k" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient" ]
[ "Definition:Differentiation", "Linear Combination of Derivatives", "Power Rule for Derivatives", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Integration by Substitution", "Binomial Theorem", "Binomial Coefficient with Zero", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Indefinite...
proofwiki-14535
Harmonic Number as Unsigned Stirling Number of First Kind over Factorial
:$H_n = \dfrac { {n + 1} \brack 2} {n!}$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number :$n!$ denotes the $n$th factorial :$\ds { {n + 1} \brack 2}$ denotes an unsigned Stirling number of the first kind.
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$H_n = \dfrac { {n + 1} \brack 2} {n!}$ $\map P 0$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = H_0 | r = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 \brack 2} {0!} | c = Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Numb...
:$H_n = \dfrac { {n + 1} \brack 2} {n!}$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$n!$ denotes the [[Definition:Factorial|$n$th factorial]] :$\ds { {n + 1} \brack 2}$ denotes an [[Definition:Unsigned Stirling Numbers of the First Kind|unsigned Stirling number of the first kind]].
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$H_n = \dfrac { {n + 1} \brack 2} {n!}$ $\map P 0$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = H_0 | r = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 \brack...
Harmonic Number as Unsigned Stirling Number of First Kind over Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Harmonic_Number_as_Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_First_Kind_over_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Harmonic_Number_as_Unsigned_Stirling_Number_of_First_Kind_over_Factorial
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "Stirling Numbers", "Factorials" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Unsigned Stirling Number of the First Kind of Number with Greater", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-14536
Sum of Harmonic Numbers approaches Harmonic Number of Product of Indices
Let $m, n \in \Z_{>0}$ be (strictly) positive integers. Let: :$\map T {m, n} := H_m + H_n - H_{m n}$ where $H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number. Then as $m$ or $n$ increases, $\map T {m, n}$ never increases, and reaches its minimum when $m$ and $n$ approach infinity.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map T {m + 1, n} - \map T {m, n} | r = \left({H_{m + 1} + H_n - H_{\paren {m + 1} n} }\right) - \paren {H_m + H_n - H_{m n} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {m + 1} + \paren {H_{\paren {m + 1} n} - H_{m n} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {m + 1} - \paren {\frac 1 {m n + 1} ...
Let $m, n \in \Z_{>0}$ be [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integers]]. Let: :$\map T {m, n} := H_m + H_n - H_{m n}$ where $H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]]. Then as $m$ or $n$ increases, $\map T {m, n}$ never increases, and reaches its minimum when $m$ a...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map T {m + 1, n} - \map T {m, n} | r = \left({H_{m + 1} + H_n - H_{\paren {m + 1} n} }\right) - \paren {H_m + H_n - H_{m n} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {m + 1} + \paren {H_{\paren {m + 1} n} - H_{m n} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {m + 1} - \paren {\frac 1 {m n + 1} ...
Sum of Harmonic Numbers approaches Harmonic Number of Product of Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Harmonic_Numbers_approaches_Harmonic_Number_of_Product_of_Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Harmonic_Numbers_approaches_Harmonic_Number_of_Product_of_Indices
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Infinity" ]
[ "Approximate Size of Sum of Harmonic Series", "Definition:Euler-Mascheroni Constant" ]
proofwiki-14537
Summation over k to n of Natural Logarithm of k
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \ln k = \map \ln {n!}$ where $n!$ denotes the $n$th factorial.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \ln k | r = \ln \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n k | c = Summation of General Logarithms }} {{eqn | r = \map \ln {n!} | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \ln k = \map \ln {n!}$ where $n!$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Factorial|factorial]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \ln k | r = \ln \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n k | c = [[Summation of General Logarithms]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \ln {n!} | c = {{Defof|Factorial}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Summation over k to n of Natural Logarithm of k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_k_to_n_of_Natural_Logarithm_of_k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_k_to_n_of_Natural_Logarithm_of_k
[ "Factorials", "Natural Logarithms" ]
[ "Definition:Factorial" ]
[ "Summation of General Logarithms" ]
proofwiki-14538
Difference between Summation of Natural Logarithms and Summation of Harmonic Numbers
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n H_k - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \map \ln {n!} \approx \gamma n + \dfrac {\ln n} 2 + 0 \cdotp 158$ where: :$H_k$ denotes the $k$th harmonic number :$n!$ denotes the $n$th factorial :$\gamma$ denotes the Euler-Mascheroni constant.
From Summation over k to n of Natural Logarithm of k: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \ln k = \map \ln {n!}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \ln {n!} | o = \approx | r = \map \ln {\sqrt {2 \pi n} \paren {\dfrac n e}^n} | c = Stirling's Formula }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 \map \ln {2 \pi} + \frac 1 2 \l...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n H_k - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \map \ln {n!} \approx \gamma n + \dfrac {\ln n} 2 + 0 \cdotp 158$ where: :$H_k$ denotes the $k$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$n!$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Factorial|factorial]] :$\gamma$ denotes the [[Definition:Euler-Mascheroni Const...
From [[Summation over k to n of Natural Logarithm of k]]: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \ln k = \map \ln {n!}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \ln {n!} | o = \approx | r = \map \ln {\sqrt {2 \pi n} \paren {\dfrac n e}^n} | c = [[Stirling's Formula]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 2 \map \ln {2 \pi} + \f...
Difference between Summation of Natural Logarithms and Summation of Harmonic Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_between_Summation_of_Natural_Logarithms_and_Summation_of_Harmonic_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_between_Summation_of_Natural_Logarithms_and_Summation_of_Harmonic_Numbers
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "Natural Logarithms" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Factorial", "Definition:Euler-Mascheroni Constant" ]
[ "Summation over k to n of Natural Logarithm of k", "Stirling's Formula", "Sum of Sequence of Harmonic Numbers", "Approximate Size of Sum of Harmonic Series" ]
proofwiki-14539
Sum over k of n Choose k by x to the k by kth Harmonic Number/x = -1
While for $x \in \R_{>0}$ be a real number: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x^k H_k = \paren {x + 1}^n \paren {H_n - \map \ln {1 + \frac 1 x} } + \epsilon$ when $x = -1$ we have: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x^k H_k = \dfrac {-1} n$ where: :$\dbinom n k$ denotes a binomial coefficient :$H_k$ denote...
When $x = -1$ we have that $1 + \dfrac 1 x = 0$, so $\map \ln {1 + \dfrac 1 x}$ is undefined. Let $S_n = \ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x^k H_k$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S_{n + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom {n + 1} k x^k H_k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {\bin...
While for $x \in \R_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x^k H_k = \paren {x + 1}^n \paren {H_n - \map \ln {1 + \frac 1 x} } + \epsilon$ when $x = -1$ we have: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x^k H_k = \dfrac {-1} n$ where: :$\dbinom n k$ denotes a [[D...
When $x = -1$ we have that $1 + \dfrac 1 x = 0$, so $\map \ln {1 + \dfrac 1 x}$ is undefined. Let $S_n = \ds \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom n k x^k H_k$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S_{n + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \binom {n + 1} k x^k H_k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop \in \Z} \paren {...
Sum over k of n Choose k by x to the k by kth Harmonic Number/x = -1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n_Choose_k_by_x_to_the_k_by_kth_Harmonic_Number/x_=_-1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_k_of_n_Choose_k_by_x_to_the_k_by_kth_Harmonic_Number/x_=_-1
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Pascal's Rule", "Alternating Sum and Difference of Binomial Coefficients for Given n", "Binomial Coefficient with Zero" ]
proofwiki-14540
Summation to n of Reciprocal of k by k-1 of Harmonic Number
:$\ds \sum_{1 \mathop < k \mathop \le n} \dfrac 1 {k \paren {k - 1} } H_k = 2 - \dfrac {H_n} n - \dfrac 1 n$ where $H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{1 \mathop < k \mathop \le n} \dfrac 1 {k \paren {k - 1} } H_k | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac 1 {\paren {k + 1} k} H_{k + 1} | c = Translation of Index Variable of Summation }} {{eqn | r = -\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \paren {\dfrac 1 {k + 1} - \dfrac 1 k} H_{k + 1...
:$\ds \sum_{1 \mathop < k \mathop \le n} \dfrac 1 {k \paren {k - 1} } H_k = 2 - \dfrac {H_n} n - \dfrac 1 n$ where $H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{1 \mathop < k \mathop \le n} \dfrac 1 {k \paren {k - 1} } H_k | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac 1 {\paren {k + 1} k} H_{k + 1} | c = [[Translation of Index Variable of Summation]] }} {{eqn | r = -\sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \paren {\dfrac 1 {k + 1} - \dfrac 1 k} H_{k...
Summation to n of Reciprocal of k by k-1 of Harmonic Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Reciprocal_of_k_by_k-1_of_Harmonic_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Reciprocal_of_k_by_k-1_of_Harmonic_Number
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Abel's Lemma/Formulation 1", "Harmonic Numbers/Examples/H2", "Definition:Telescoping Series" ]
proofwiki-14541
Riemann Zeta Function of 1000
To at least $100$ decimal places: :$\map \zeta {1000} \approx 1$ where $\zeta$ denotes the Riemann zeta function.
By definition of the general harmonic numbers: :$\ds \map \zeta r = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} H_n^{\paren r} = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 1} \frac 1 {k^r}$ From Sequence of General Harmonic Numbers Converges for Index Greater than 1: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \zeta {1000} | o = \le | r = \dfrac {2^{1000} } ...
To at least $100$ [[Definition:Decimal Place|decimal places]]: :$\map \zeta {1000} \approx 1$ where $\zeta$ denotes the [[Definition:Riemann Zeta Function|Riemann zeta function]].
By definition of the [[Definition:General Harmonic Numbers|general harmonic numbers]]: :$\ds \map \zeta r = \lim_{n \mathop \to \infty} H_n^{\paren r} = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 1} \frac 1 {k^r}$ From [[Sequence of General Harmonic Numbers Converges for Index Greater than 1]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \zeta {1000} ...
Riemann Zeta Function of 1000
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Riemann_Zeta_Function_of_1000
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Riemann_Zeta_Function_of_1000
[ "Riemann Zeta Function" ]
[ "Definition:Decimal Expansion/Decimal Place", "Definition:Riemann Zeta Function" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers/General Definition", "Sequence of General Harmonic Numbers Converges for Index Greater than 1", "Definition:Decimal Expansion/Decimal Place" ]
proofwiki-14542
Summation to n of kth Harmonic Number over k
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} k = \dfrac { {H_n}^2 + \harm 2 n } 2$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number :$\harm 2 n$ denotes the general harmonic number of order $2$ evaluated at $n$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} k | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 k \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^k \dfrac 1 j | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^k \dfrac 1 j \dfrac 1 k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 2 \paren {\paren {...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} k = \dfrac { {H_n}^2 + \harm 2 n } 2$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$\harm 2 n$ denotes the [[Definition:General Harmonic Numbers|general harmonic number of order $2$]] evaluated at $n$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} k | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 k \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^k \dfrac 1 j | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^k \dfrac 1 j \dfrac 1 k | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 2 \paren {\paren {...
Summation to n of kth Harmonic Number over k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_kth_Harmonic_Number_over_k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_kth_Harmonic_Number_over_k
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "General Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers/General Definition" ]
[ "Summation of Products of n Numbers taken m at a time with Repetitions/Examples/Order 2" ]
proofwiki-14543
Summation to n of kth Harmonic Number over k+1
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {k + 1} = \dfrac { {H_{n + 1} }^2 - \harm 2 {n + 1} } 2$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number :$\harm 2 n$ denotes the general harmonic number of order $2$ evaluated at $n$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {k + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {k + 1} \paren {H_{k + 1} - \dfrac 1 {\paren {k + 1} } } | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\dfrac {H_{k + 1} } {k + 1} - \dfrac 1 {\paren {k + 1} \paren {k ...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {k + 1} = \dfrac { {H_{n + 1} }^2 - \harm 2 {n + 1} } 2$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$\harm 2 n$ denotes the [[Definition:General Harmonic Numbers|general harmonic number of order $2$]] evaluated at $n$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {k + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {k + 1} \paren {H_{k + 1} - \dfrac 1 {\paren {k + 1} } } | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\dfrac {H_{k + 1} } {k + 1} - \dfrac 1 {\paren {k + 1} \paren {k ...
Summation to n of kth Harmonic Number over k+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_kth_Harmonic_Number_over_k+1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_kth_Harmonic_Number_over_k+1
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "General Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers/General Definition" ]
[ "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Harmonic Numbers/Examples/H1", "Summation to n of kth Harmonic Number over k" ]
proofwiki-14544
Sum of External Angles of Polygon equals Four Right Angles
Let the external angles of a polygon be generated in the same direction going around the polygon. Then the sum of all these external angles equals $4$ right angles, that is, $360 \degrees$.
Let $V$ be an arbitrary vertex of a polygon $P$. Let $T$ be the sum of all the external angles of $P$ Let $A$ be the size of the internal angle of $V$. Let $E$ be the size of the external angle of $V$. By definition, $E = 180 \degrees - A$. Let $S$ denote the sum of all internal angles of $P$. Hence we have: :$T = n \t...
Let the [[Definition:External Angle of Polygon|external angles]] of a [[Definition:Polygon|polygon]] be generated in the same direction going around the [[Definition:Polygon|polygon]]. Then the [[Definition:Real Addition|sum]] of all these [[Definition:External Angle|external angles]] equals $4$ [[Definition:Right Ang...
Let $V$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Vertex of Polygon|vertex]] of a [[Definition:Polygon|polygon]] $P$. Let $T$ be the sum of all the [[Definition:External Angle|external angles]] of $P$ Let $A$ be the [[Definition:Measure of Angle|size]] of the [[Definition:Internal Angle|internal angle]] of $V$. Let $E$ be the [...
Sum of External Angles of Polygon equals Four Right Angles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_External_Angles_of_Polygon_equals_Four_Right_Angles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_External_Angles_of_Polygon_equals_Four_Right_Angles
[ "External Angles", "Polygons" ]
[ "Definition:External Angle of Polygon", "Definition:Polygon", "Definition:Polygon", "Definition:Addition/Real Numbers", "Definition:Polygon/External Angle", "Definition:Right Angle" ]
[ "Definition:Polygon/Vertex", "Definition:Polygon", "Definition:Polygon/External Angle", "Definition:Angular Measure", "Definition:Polygon/Internal Angle", "Definition:Angular Measure", "Definition:Polygon/External Angle", "Definition:Polygon/Internal Angle", "Sum of Internal Angles of Polygon" ]
proofwiki-14545
Bisector of Apex of Isosceles Triangle also Bisects Base
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an isosceles triangle whose apex is $A$. Let $AD$ be the bisector of $\angle BAC$ such that $AD$ intersects $BC$ at $D$. Then $AD$ bisects $BC$.
By definition of isosceles triangle, $AB = AC$. By definition of bisector, $\angle BAD = \angle CAD$. By construction, $AD$ is common. Thus by Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence, $\triangle ABD = \triangle ACD$. Thus $AD = DC$. The result follows by definition of bisection. {{qed}}
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an [[Definition:Isosceles Triangle|isosceles triangle]] whose [[Definition:Apex of Isosceles Triangle|apex]] is $A$. Let $AD$ be the [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]] of $\angle BAC$ such that $AD$ [[Definition:Intersection (Geometry)|intersects]] $BC$ at $D$. Then $AD$ [[Definition:Bisection|...
By definition of [[Definition:Isosceles Triangle|isosceles triangle]], $AB = AC$. By definition of [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]], $\angle BAD = \angle CAD$. By construction, $AD$ is common. Thus by [[Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence]], $\triangle ABD = \triangle ACD$. Thus $AD = DC$. The result follows by d...
Bisector of Apex of Isosceles Triangle also Bisects Base
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bisector_of_Apex_of_Isosceles_Triangle_also_Bisects_Base
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bisector_of_Apex_of_Isosceles_Triangle_also_Bisects_Base
[ "Isosceles Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles/Apex", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Intersection (Geometry)", "Definition:Bisection" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles", "Definition:Bisection", "Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence", "Definition:Bisection" ]
proofwiki-14546
Bisector of Apex of Isosceles Triangle is Perpendicular to Base
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an isosceles triangle whose apex is $A$. Let $AD$ be the bisector of $\angle BAC$ such that $AD$ intersects $BC$ at $D$. Then $AD$ is perpendicular to $BC$.
By definition of isosceles triangle, $AB = AC$. By definition of bisector, $\angle BAD = \angle CAD$. By construction, $AD$ is common. Thus by Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence, $\triangle ABD = \triangle ACD$. Thus $\angle ADB = \angle ADC$. By Two Angles on Straight Line make Two Right Angles, $\angle ADB + \angle ...
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an [[Definition:Isosceles Triangle|isosceles triangle]] whose [[Definition:Apex of Isosceles Triangle|apex]] is $A$. Let $AD$ be the [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]] of $\angle BAC$ such that $AD$ [[Definition:Intersection (Geometry)|intersects]] $BC$ at $D$. Then $AD$ is [[Definition:Perpend...
By definition of [[Definition:Isosceles Triangle|isosceles triangle]], $AB = AC$. By definition of [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]], $\angle BAD = \angle CAD$. By construction, $AD$ is common. Thus by [[Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence]], $\triangle ABD = \triangle ACD$. Thus $\angle ADB = \angle ADC$. By [[Tw...
Bisector of Apex of Isosceles Triangle is Perpendicular to Base
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bisector_of_Apex_of_Isosceles_Triangle_is_Perpendicular_to_Base
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bisector_of_Apex_of_Isosceles_Triangle_is_Perpendicular_to_Base
[ "Isosceles Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles/Apex", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Intersection (Geometry)", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles", "Definition:Bisection", "Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence", "Two Angles on Straight Line make Two Right Angles", "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular" ]
proofwiki-14547
Equilateral Triangle is Equiangular
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an equilateral triangle. Then $\triangle ABC$ is also equiangular, with each internal angle equal to $60 \degrees$.
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an equilateral triangle. By definition of equilateral triangle, any two of the sides of $\triangle ABC$ are equal. {{WLOG}}, let $AB = AC$. Then by Isosceles Triangle has Two Equal Angles: :$\angle ABC = \angle ACB$ As the choice of equal sides was arbitrary, it follows that every two of the inte...
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an [[Definition:Equilateral Triangle|equilateral triangle]]. Then $\triangle ABC$ is also [[Definition:Equiangular Polygon|equiangular]], with each [[Definition:Internal Angle|internal angle]] equal to $60 \degrees$.
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an [[Definition:Equilateral Triangle|equilateral triangle]]. By definition of [[Definition:Equilateral Triangle|equilateral triangle]], any two of the [[Definition:Side of Polygon|sides]] of $\triangle ABC$ are equal. {{WLOG}}, let $AB = AC$. Then by [[Isosceles Triangle has Two Equal Angles]]...
Equilateral Triangle is Equiangular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equilateral_Triangle_is_Equiangular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equilateral_Triangle_is_Equiangular
[ "Equilateral Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Equilateral", "Definition:Polygon/Equiangular", "Definition:Polygon/Internal Angle" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Equilateral", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Equilateral", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Isosceles Triangle has Two Equal Angles", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Polygon/Internal Angle", "Definition:Polygon/Internal Angle", "Sum of Angles of Triangle equals Two R...
proofwiki-14548
Equiangular Triangle is Equilateral
Let $\triangle ABC$ be equiangular. Then $\triangle ABC$ is an equilateral triangle.
Let $\triangle ABC$ be equiangular. By definition of equiangular polygon, any two of the internal angles of $\triangle ABC$ are equal. {{WLOG}}, let $\angle ABC = \angle ACB$. Then by Triangle with Two Equal Angles is Isosceles, $AB = AC$. As the choice of equal angles was arbitrary, it follows that any two sides of $\...
Let $\triangle ABC$ be [[Definition:Equiangular Polygon|equiangular]]. Then $\triangle ABC$ is an [[Definition:Equilateral Triangle|equilateral triangle]].
Let $\triangle ABC$ be [[Definition:Equiangular Polygon|equiangular]]. By definition of [[Definition:Equiangular Polygon|equiangular polygon]], any two of the [[Definition:Internal Angle|internal angles]] of $\triangle ABC$ are equal. {{WLOG}}, let $\angle ABC = \angle ACB$. Then by [[Triangle with Two Equal Angles ...
Equiangular Triangle is Equilateral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equiangular_Triangle_is_Equilateral
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equiangular_Triangle_is_Equilateral
[ "Equilateral Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Polygon/Equiangular", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Equilateral" ]
[ "Definition:Polygon/Equiangular", "Definition:Polygon/Equiangular", "Definition:Polygon/Internal Angle", "Triangle with Two Equal Angles is Isosceles", "Definition:Polygon/Internal Angle", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Equilateral" ]
proofwiki-14549
Characterization of Strictly Increasing Mapping on Woset
Let $J$ and $E$ be well-ordered sets. Let $h: J \to E$ be a mapping. Let $S_\alpha$ denote an initial segment determined by $\alpha$. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad h$ is strictly increasing and its image is either all of $E$ or an initial segment of $E$ :$(2): \quad \forall \alpha \in J: \map h \alpha = \map \min {E \setminus ...
=== $(1)$ implies $(2)$ === Suppose $h$ satisfies: :$h$ is strictly increasing and its image is either all of $E$ or an initial segment of $E$ Then for any $x,y \in J$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \prec | r = y }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map h x | o = \prec | r = \map h y |...
Let $J$ and $E$ be [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered sets]]. Let $h: J \to E$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $S_\alpha$ denote an [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segment determined by $\alpha$]]. {{TFAE}} :$(1): \quad h$ is [[Definition:Strictly Increasing Mapping|strictly increasing]] and ...
=== $(1)$ implies $(2)$ === Suppose $h$ satisfies: :$h$ is [[Definition:Strictly Increasing Mapping|strictly increasing]] and its [[Definition:Image Set of Mapping|image]] is either all of $E$ or an [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segment]] of $E$ Then for any $x,y \in J$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o...
Characterization of Strictly Increasing Mapping on Woset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Strictly_Increasing_Mapping_on_Woset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Strictly_Increasing_Mapping_on_Woset
[ "Well-Orderings" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Strictly Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Smallest Element" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Strictly Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Initial Segment" ]
proofwiki-14550
No Order Isomophism Between Distinct Initial Segments of Woset
Let $E$ be a well-ordered set. Let $S_\alpha, S_\beta$ be initial segments of $E$ that are order isomorphic. Then $S_\alpha = S_\beta$.
{{AimForCont}} $S_\alpha \ne S_\beta$. Then $\alpha \ne \beta$. By the trichotomy law, $\alpha \prec \beta$ or $\beta \prec \alpha$. {{WLOG}} assume $\alpha \prec \beta$. Then $S_\alpha \subsetneqq S_\beta$. That is, $S_\alpha$ is an initial segment of $S_\beta$. We have {{hypothesis}} that $S_\alpha$ and $S_\beta$ are...
Let $E$ be a [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered set]]. Let $S_\alpha, S_\beta$ be [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segments]] of $E$ that are [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphic]]. Then $S_\alpha = S_\beta$.
{{AimForCont}} $S_\alpha \ne S_\beta$. Then $\alpha \ne \beta$. By the [[Trichotomy Law (Ordering)|trichotomy law]], $\alpha \prec \beta$ or $\beta \prec \alpha$. {{WLOG}} assume $\alpha \prec \beta$. Then $S_\alpha \subsetneqq S_\beta$. That is, $S_\alpha$ is an [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segment]] of $...
No Order Isomophism Between Distinct Initial Segments of Woset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/No_Order_Isomophism_Between_Distinct_Initial_Segments_of_Woset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/No_Order_Isomophism_Between_Distinct_Initial_Segments_of_Woset
[ "Well-Orderings" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Order Isomorphism" ]
[ "Trichotomy Law (Ordering)", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Contradiction", "Well-Ordered Class is not Isomorphic to Initial Segment" ]
proofwiki-14551
Perpendicular is Shortest Straight Line from Point to Straight Line
Let $AB$ be a straight line. Let $C$ be a point which is not on $AB$. Let $D$ be a point on $AB$ such that $CD$ is perpendicular to $AB$. Then the length of $CD$ is less than the length of all other line segments that can be drawn from $C$ to $AB$.
Let $E$ on $AB$ such that $E$ is different from $D$. Then $CDE$ forms a right triangle where $CE$ is the hypotenuse. By Pythagoras's Theorem: :$CD^2 + DE^2 = CE^2$ and so $CD < CE$. {{qed}}
Let $AB$ be a [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]]. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Point|point]] which is not on $AB$. Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Point|point]] on $AB$ such that $CD$ is [[Definition:Perpendicular|perpendicular]] to $AB$. Then the [[Definition:Length of Line|length]] of $CD$ is less than the [[Defin...
Let $E$ on $AB$ such that $E$ is different from $D$. Then $CDE$ forms a [[Definition:Right Triangle|right triangle]] where $CE$ is the [[Definition:Hypotenuse|hypotenuse]]. By [[Pythagoras's Theorem]]: :$CD^2 + DE^2 = CE^2$ and so $CD < CE$. {{qed}}
Perpendicular is Shortest Straight Line from Point to Straight Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Perpendicular_is_Shortest_Straight_Line_from_Point_to_Straight_Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Perpendicular_is_Shortest_Straight_Line_from_Point_to_Straight_Line
[ "Perpendicular Distance from Straight Line in Plane to Point" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Line/Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled/Hypotenuse", "Pythagoras's Theorem" ]
proofwiki-14552
Straight Lines which make Equal Angles with Perpendicular to Straight Line are Equal
Let $AB$ be a straight line. Let $C$ be a point which is not on $AB$. Let $D$ be a point on $AB$ such that $CD$ is perpendicular to $AB$. Let $E, F$ be points on $AB$ such that $\angle DCE = \angle DCF$. Then $CE = CF$.
$\triangle CDE$ and $\triangle CDF$ are right triangle where $CE$ and $CF$ are the hypotenuses. We have: :$\angle CDE = \angle CDF$ as both are right angles. :$\angle DCE = \angle DCF$ by hypothesis. :$CD$ is common. Thus by Triangle Angle-Side-Angle Congruence, $\triangle CDE$ and $\triangle CDF$ are congruent. Hence ...
Let $AB$ be a [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]]. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Point|point]] which is not on $AB$. Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Point|point]] on $AB$ such that $CD$ is [[Definition:Perpendicular|perpendicular]] to $AB$. Let $E, F$ be [[Definition:Point|points]] on $AB$ such that $\angle DCE = \angl...
$\triangle CDE$ and $\triangle CDF$ are [[Definition:Right Triangle|right triangle]] where $CE$ and $CF$ are the [[Definition:Hypotenuse|hypotenuses]]. We have: :$\angle CDE = \angle CDF$ as both are [[Definition:Right Angle|right angles]]. :$\angle DCE = \angle DCF$ [[Definition:By Hypothesis|by hypothesis]]. :$CD$...
Straight Lines which make Equal Angles with Perpendicular to Straight Line are Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Straight_Lines_which_make_Equal_Angles_with_Perpendicular_to_Straight_Line_are_Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Straight_Lines_which_make_Equal_Angles_with_Perpendicular_to_Straight_Line_are_Equal
[ "Lines", "Angles" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular", "Definition:Point" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled/Hypotenuse", "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Triangle Angle-Side-Angle Congruence", "Definition:Congruence (Geometry)" ]
proofwiki-14553
Distance between Two Parallel Straight Lines is Everywhere the Same
Let $AB$ and $CD$ be parallel straight lines. Let perpendiculars $EF$ and $GH$ be drawn from $AB$ to $CD$, where $E, G$ are on $AB$ and $F, H$ are on $CD$. Then $EF = GH$. That is, the distance between $AB$ and $CD$ is the same everywhere along their length.
$\angle EFH, \angle FEG, \angle EGH, \angle FHG$ are all right angles. Then $EF$ and $GH$ are parallel. Thus $\Box EFHG$ is by definition a parallelogram. From Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal it follows that $EF = GH$. {{qed}}
Let $AB$ and $CD$ be [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] [[Definition:Straight Line|straight lines]]. Let [[Definition:Perpendicular|perpendiculars]] $EF$ and $GH$ be drawn from $AB$ to $CD$, where $E, G$ are on $AB$ and $F, H$ are on $CD$. Then $EF = GH$. That is, the [[Definition:Distance between Parallel Line...
$\angle EFH, \angle FEG, \angle EGH, \angle FHG$ are all [[Definition:Right Angle|right angles]]. Then $EF$ and $GH$ are [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]]. Thus $\Box EFHG$ is by definition a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]]. From [[Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal]] it follows tha...
Distance between Two Parallel Straight Lines is Everywhere the Same
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distance_between_Two_Parallel_Straight_Lines_is_Everywhere_the_Same
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distance_between_Two_Parallel_Straight_Lines_is_Everywhere_the_Same
[ "Parallel Lines" ]
[ "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular", "Definition:Distance between Parallel Lines", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length" ]
[ "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal" ]
proofwiki-14554
Diagonals of Rhombus Bisect Each Other at Right Angles
Let $ABCD$ be a rhombus. The diagonals $AC$ and $BD$ of $ABCD$ bisect each other at right angles.
By the definition of a rhombus, $AB = AD = BC = DC$. {{WLOG}}, consider the diagonal $BD$. Thus: : $\triangle ABD$ is an isosceles triangle whose apex is $A$ and whose base is $BD$. By Diagonals of Rhombus Bisect Angles, $AC$ bisects $\angle BAD$. From Bisector of Apex of Isosceles Triangle also Bisects Base, $AC$ bise...
Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Rhombus|rhombus]]. The [[Definition:Diagonal of Parallelogram|diagonals]] $AC$ and $BD$ of $ABCD$ [[Definition:Bisection|bisect]] each other at [[Definition:Right Angle|right angles]].
By the definition of a [[Definition:Rhombus|rhombus]], $AB = AD = BC = DC$. {{WLOG}}, consider the [[Definition:Diagonal of Parallelogram|diagonal]] $BD$. Thus: : $\triangle ABD$ is an [[Definition:Isosceles Triangle|isosceles triangle]] whose [[Definition:Apex of Isosceles Triangle|apex]] is $A$ and whose [[Definiti...
Diagonals of Rhombus Bisect Each Other at Right Angles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonals_of_Rhombus_Bisect_Each_Other_at_Right_Angles
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonals_of_Rhombus_Bisect_Each_Other_at_Right_Angles
[ "Parallelograms" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rhombus", "Definition:Diameter of Parallelogram", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Right Angle" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rhombus", "Definition:Diameter of Parallelogram", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles/Apex", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Isosceles/Base", "Diagonals of Rhombus Bisect Angles", "Definition:Bisection", "Bisector of Apex of I...
proofwiki-14555
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff One Pair of Opposite Sides is Equal and Parallel
Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral. Then: :$ABCD$ is a parallelogram {{iff}}: :$AB = CD$ and $AB \parallel CD$ where $AB \parallel CD$ denotes that $AB$ is parallel to $CD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. Then $AB \parallel CD$ by definition. From Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal it follows that $AB = CD$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Quadrilateral|quadrilateral]]. Then: :$ABCD$ is a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]] {{iff}}: :$AB = CD$ and $AB \parallel CD$ where $AB \parallel CD$ denotes that $AB$ is [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] to $CD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]]. Then $AB \parallel CD$ by definition. From [[Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal]] it follows that $AB = CD$. {{qed|lemma}}
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff One Pair of Opposite Sides is Equal and Parallel
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_One_Pair_of_Opposite_Sides_is_Equal_and_Parallel
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_One_Pair_of_Opposite_Sides_is_Equal_and_Parallel
[ "Parallelograms" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram" ]
proofwiki-14556
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Sides are Equal or Parallel
Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral. Then: :$ABCD$ is a parallelogram {{iff}}: :either $AB = CD$ and $AD = BC$ :or $AB \parallel CD$ and $AD \parallel BC$ where $AB \parallel CD$ denotes that $AB$ is parallel to $CD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. Then by definition: :$AB \parallel CD$ and $AD \parallel BC$ and from Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal: :$AB = CD$ and $AD = BC$ From Conjunction implies Disjunction, it follows that: :either $AB = CD$ and $AD = BC$ :or $AB \parallel CD$ an...
Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Quadrilateral|quadrilateral]]. Then: :$ABCD$ is a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]] {{iff}}: :either $AB = CD$ and $AD = BC$ :or $AB \parallel CD$ and $AD \parallel BC$ where $AB \parallel CD$ denotes that $AB$ is [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] to $CD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]]. Then by definition: :$AB \parallel CD$ and $AD \parallel BC$ and from [[Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal]]: :$AB = CD$ and $AD = BC$ From [[Conjunction implies Disjunction]], it follows that: :either $AB = C...
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Sides are Equal or Parallel
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_Both_Pairs_of_Opposite_Sides_are_Equal_or_Parallel
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_Both_Pairs_of_Opposite_Sides_are_Equal_or_Parallel
[ "Parallelograms" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal", "Conjunction implies Disjunction", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram" ]
proofwiki-14557
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Angles are Equal
Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral. Then: :$ABCD$ is a parallelogram {{iff}}: :$\angle ABC = \angle ADC$ and $\angle BAD = \angle BCD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. Then by Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal: :$\angle ABC = \angle ADC$ and $\angle BAD = \angle BCD$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Quadrilateral|quadrilateral]]. Then: :$ABCD$ is a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]] {{iff}}: :$\angle ABC = \angle ADC$ and $\angle BAD = \angle BCD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]]. Then by [[Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal]]: :$\angle ABC = \angle ADC$ and $\angle BAD = \angle BCD$. {{qed|lemma}}
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Angles are Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_Both_Pairs_of_Opposite_Angles_are_Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_Both_Pairs_of_Opposite_Angles_are_Equal
[ "Parallelograms" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal" ]
proofwiki-14558
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Diagonals Bisect each other
Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral. Then: : $ABCD$ is a parallelogram {{iff}}: :both: :: $AD$ is a bisector of $BC$ :and: :: $BC$ is a bisector of $AD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. Then by Diameters of Parallelogram Bisect each other: : $AD$ is a bisector of $BC$ and : $BC$ is a bisector of $AD$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Quadrilateral|quadrilateral]]. Then: : $ABCD$ is a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]] {{iff}}: :both: :: $AD$ is a [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]] of $BC$ :and: :: $BC$ is a [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]] of $AD$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]]. Then by [[Diameters of Parallelogram Bisect each other]]: : $AD$ is a [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]] of $BC$ and : $BC$ is a [[Definition:Bisection|bisector]] of $AD$. {{qed|lemma}}
Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Diagonals Bisect each other
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_Diagonals_Bisect_each_other
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_is_Parallelogram_iff_Diagonals_Bisect_each_other
[ "Parallelograms" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Bisection" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Diameters of Parallelogram Bisect each other", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram" ]
proofwiki-14559
Parallelograms are Congruent if Two Adjacent Sides and Included Angle are respectively Equal
Let $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ be parallelograms. Then $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ are congruent if: : $2$ adjacent sides of $ABCD$ are equal to $2$ corresponding adjacent sides of $EFGH$ : the angle between those $2$ adjacent sides on both $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ are equal.
{{WLOG}} let the $2$ adjacent sides of $ABCD$ be $AB$ and $BC$. Let the $2$ corresponding adjacent sides of $EFGH$ be $EF$ and $FG$ such that $AB = EF$ and $BC = FG$. Hence let $\angle ABC = \angle EFG$. From Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence: :$\triangle ABC = \triangle EFG$ From Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff B...
Let $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ be [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelograms]]. Then $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ are [[Definition:Congruence (Geometry)|congruent]] if: : $2$ [[Definition:Adjacent Sides|adjacent sides]] of $ABCD$ are equal to $2$ corresponding [[Definition:Adjacent Sides|adjacent sides]] of $EFGH$ : the [[Definition:Plane...
{{WLOG}} let the $2$ [[Definition:Adjacent Sides|adjacent sides]] of $ABCD$ be $AB$ and $BC$. Let the $2$ corresponding [[Definition:Adjacent Sides|adjacent sides]] of $EFGH$ be $EF$ and $FG$ such that $AB = EF$ and $BC = FG$. Hence let $\angle ABC = \angle EFG$. From [[Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence]]: :$\tri...
Parallelograms are Congruent if Two Adjacent Sides and Included Angle are respectively Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Parallelograms_are_Congruent_if_Two_Adjacent_Sides_and_Included_Angle_are_respectively_Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Parallelograms_are_Congruent_if_Two_Adjacent_Sides_and_Included_Angle_are_respectively_Equal
[ "Parallelograms" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Congruence (Geometry)", "Definition:Polygon/Adjacent/Sides", "Definition:Polygon/Adjacent/Sides", "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Polygon/Adjacent/Sides" ]
[ "Definition:Polygon/Adjacent/Sides", "Definition:Polygon/Adjacent/Sides", "Triangle Side-Angle-Side Congruence", "Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Angles are Equal", "Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Sides are Equal or Parallel", "Triangle Side-Angle-Side ...
proofwiki-14560
Rectangles with Equal Bases and Equal Altitudes are Congruent
Let $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ be rectangles. Then $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ are congruent if: : the base of $ABCD$ equals the base of $EFGH$ : the altitude of $ABCD$ equals the altitude of $EFGH$.
A rectangle is a parallelogram whose vertices are right angles. Thus the altitudes of $ABCD$ and of $EFGH$ coincide with the sides of $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ which are adjacent to the bases. The result then follows from Parallelograms are Congruent if Two Adjacent Sides and Included Angle are respectively Equal. {{qed}}
Let $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ be [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangles]]. Then $ABCD$ and $EFGH$ are [[Definition:Congruence (Geometry)|congruent]] if: : the [[Definition:Base of Parallelogram|base]] of $ABCD$ equals the [[Definition:Base of Parallelogram|base]] of $EFGH$ : the [[Definition:Altitude of Parallelogram|altitude]] of...
A [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangle]] is a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]] whose [[Definition:Vertex of Polygon|vertices]] are [[Definition:Right Angle|right angles]]. Thus the [[Definition:Altitude of Parallelogram|altitudes]] of $ABCD$ and of $EFGH$ coincide with the [[Definition:Side of Polygon|sides]] of...
Rectangles with Equal Bases and Equal Altitudes are Congruent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rectangles_with_Equal_Bases_and_Equal_Altitudes_are_Congruent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rectangles_with_Equal_Bases_and_Equal_Altitudes_are_Congruent
[ "Rectangles" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:Congruence (Geometry)", "Definition:Parallelogram/Base", "Definition:Parallelogram/Base", "Definition:Parallelogram/Altitude", "Definition:Parallelogram/Altitude" ]
[ "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Polygon/Vertex", "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:Parallelogram/Altitude", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Polygon/Adjacent/Sides", "Definition:Parallelogram/Base", "Parallelograms are Congruent i...
proofwiki-14561
Parallel Lines which intercept Equal Segments on Transversals
Let $3$ or more parallel lines intersect equal line segments on one transversal. Then those same $3$ or more parallel lines intersect equal line segments on every transversal.
{{ProofWanted|Someone who understands what this is really trying to say?}}
Let $3$ or more [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel lines]] intersect equal [[Definition:Line Segment|line segments]] on one [[Definition:Transversal|transversal]]. Then those same $3$ or more [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel lines]] intersect equal [[Definition:Line Segment|line segments]] on every [[Definition:...
{{ProofWanted|Someone who understands what this is really trying to say?}}
Parallel Lines which intercept Equal Segments on Transversals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Parallel_Lines_which_intercept_Equal_Segments_on_Transversals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Parallel_Lines_which_intercept_Equal_Segments_on_Transversals
[ "Parallel Lines" ]
[ "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Transversal", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Transversal" ]
[]
proofwiki-14562
Line Parallel to Side of Triangle which Bisects One Side also Bisects Other Side
Let $ABC$ be a triangle. Let $DE$ be a straight line parallel to $BC$. Let $DE$ bisect $AB$. Then $DE$ also bisects $AC$. That is, $DE$ is a midline of $\triangle ABC$. 400px
This is a direct application of the Parallel Transversal Theorem. {{qed}}
Let $ABC$ be a [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangle]]. Let $DE$ be a [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]] [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] to $BC$. Let $DE$ [[Definition:Bisection|bisect]] $AB$. Then $DE$ also [[Definition:Bisection|bisects]] $AC$. That is, $DE$ is a [[Definition:Midline of Triang...
This is a direct application of the [[Parallel Transversal Theorem]]. {{qed}}
Line Parallel to Side of Triangle which Bisects One Side also Bisects Other Side
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Line_Parallel_to_Side_of_Triangle_which_Bisects_One_Side_also_Bisects_Other_Side
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Line_Parallel_to_Side_of_Triangle_which_Bisects_One_Side_also_Bisects_Other_Side
[ "Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Midline of Triangle", "File:Midline of Triangle.png" ]
[ "Parallel Transversal Theorem" ]
proofwiki-14563
Midline Theorem
The midline of a triangle is parallel to the third side of that triangle and half its length.
400px Let $\triangle ABC$ be a triangle. Let $DE$ be the midline of $\triangle ABC$ through $AB$ and $AC$. Extend $DE$ to $DF$ so $DE = EF$. As $E$ is the midpoint of $AC$, the diagonals of the quadrilateral $ADCF$ bisect each other. From Quadrilateral with Bisecting Diagonals is Parallelogram, $ADCF$ is a parallelogra...
The [[Definition:Midline of Triangle|midline]] of a [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangle]] is [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] to the third [[Definition:Side of Polygon|side]] of that [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangle]] and half its [[Definition:Length of Line|length]].
[[File:Midline Theorem.png|400px]] Let $\triangle ABC$ be a [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangle]]. Let $DE$ be the [[Definition:Midline of Triangle|midline]] of $\triangle ABC$ through $AB$ and $AC$. Extend $DE$ to $DF$ so $DE = EF$. As $E$ is the [[Definition:Midpoint of Line|midpoint]] of $AC$, the [[Defini...
Midline Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Midline_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Midline_Theorem
[ "Midline Theorem", "Triangles", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Midline of Triangle", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length" ]
[ "File:Midline Theorem.png", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Definition:Midline of Triangle", "Definition:Line/Midpoint", "Definition:Diameter of Quadrilateral", "Definition:Quadrilateral", "Definition:Bisection", "Quadrilateral with Bisecting Diagonals is Parallelogram", "Definition:Quadrilateral...
proofwiki-14564
Midline and Median of Triangle Bisect Each Other
Let $\triangle ABC$ be a triangle. Let $DE$ be the midline of $\triangle ABC$ which bisects $AB$ and $AC$. Let $AF$ be the median of $ABC$ which bisects $BC$. Then $AF$ and $DE$ bisect each other.
400px Construct the midlines $DF$ and $EF$. Then by the Midline Theorem $DF \parallel AE$ and $EF \parallel AD$. Thus by Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Sides are Equal or Parallel, $\Box ADFE$ is a parallelogram. By construction, $AF$ and $DE$ are the diagonals of $\Box ADFE$. The result foll...
Let $\triangle ABC$ be a [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangle]]. Let $DE$ be the [[Definition:Midline of Triangle|midline]] of $\triangle ABC$ which [[Definition:Bisection|bisects]] $AB$ and $AC$. Let $AF$ be the [[Definition:Median of Triangle|median]] of $ABC$ which [[Definition:Bisection|bisects]] $BC$. The...
[[File:Midline and Median of Triangle Bisect Each Other.png|400px]] Construct the [[Definition:Midline of Triangle|midlines]] $DF$ and $EF$. Then by the [[Midline Theorem]] $DF \parallel AE$ and $EF \parallel AD$. Thus by [[Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Sides are Equal or Parallel]], $\Bo...
Midline and Median of Triangle Bisect Each Other
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Midline_and_Median_of_Triangle_Bisect_Each_Other
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Midline_and_Median_of_Triangle_Bisect_Each_Other
[ "Triangles", "Medians of Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Definition:Midline of Triangle", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Median of Triangle", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Bisection" ]
[ "File:Midline and Median of Triangle Bisect Each Other.png", "Definition:Midline of Triangle", "Midline Theorem", "Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Both Pairs of Opposite Sides are Equal or Parallel", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Diameter of Quadrilateral", "Diameters of Paral...
proofwiki-14565
Median to Hypotenuse of Right Triangle equals Half Hypotenuse
Let $\triangle ABC$ be a right triangle such that $BC$ is the hypotenuse. Let $AD$ be the median to $BC$. Then $AD$ is half of $BC$.
400px Construct $BE$ and $CE$ parallel to $AC$ and $AB$ respectively. Then by definition $ABEC$ is a parallelogram. By construction, $BC$ is a diagonal of $ABEC$ such that $AD$ is a bisector of it. Thus by Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Diagonals Bisect each other, $AE$ is also a bisector of $ABEC$. As $\angle BAC$...
Let $\triangle ABC$ be a [[Definition:Right Triangle|right triangle]] such that $BC$ is the [[Definition:Hypotenuse|hypotenuse]]. Let $AD$ be the [[Definition:Median of Triangle|median]] to $BC$. Then $AD$ is half of $BC$.
[[File:Median to Hypotenuse of Right Triangle equals Half Hypotenuse.png|400px]] Construct $BE$ and $CE$ [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] to $AC$ and $AB$ respectively. Then by definition $ABEC$ is a [[Definition:Parallelogram|parallelogram]]. By construction, $BC$ is a [[Definition:Diagonal of Parallelogram|d...
Median to Hypotenuse of Right Triangle equals Half Hypotenuse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Median_to_Hypotenuse_of_Right_Triangle_equals_Half_Hypotenuse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Median_to_Hypotenuse_of_Right_Triangle_equals_Half_Hypotenuse
[ "Right Triangles", "Medians of Triangles" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Right-Angled/Hypotenuse", "Definition:Median of Triangle" ]
[ "File:Median to Hypotenuse of Right Triangle equals Half Hypotenuse.png", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Diameter of Parallelogram", "Definition:Bisection", "Quadrilateral is Parallelogram iff Diagonals Bisect each other", "Definition:Bisect...
proofwiki-14566
Diagonals of Rectangle are Equal
The diagonals of a rectangle are equal.
:400px Let $ABCD$ be a rectangle. The diagonals of $ABCD$ are $AC$ and $BD$. Then $\angle ADC = \angle DAB$ as both are right angles by definition of rectangle. By Rectangle is Parallelogram, $ABCD$ is also a type of parallelogram. Thus by Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram are Equal $AB = DC$. Thus we have: :$...
The [[Definition:Diagonal of Quadrilateral|diagonals]] of a [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangle]] are equal.
:[[File:Diagonals of Rectangle are Equal.png|400px]] Let $ABCD$ be a [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangle]]. The [[Definition:Diagonal of Quadrilateral|diagonals]] of $ABCD$ are $AC$ and $BD$. Then $\angle ADC = \angle DAB$ as both are [[Definition:Right Angle|right angles]] by definition of [[Definition:Rectangle|recta...
Diagonals of Rectangle are Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonals_of_Rectangle_are_Equal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonals_of_Rectangle_are_Equal
[ "Rectangles" ]
[ "Definition:Diameter of Quadrilateral", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle" ]
[ "File:Diagonals of Rectangle are Equal.png", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:Diameter of Quadrilateral", "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Rectangle is Parallelogram", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Opposite Sides and Angles of Parallelogram...
proofwiki-14567
Summation to n of Square of kth Harmonic Number
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {H_k}^2 = \paren {n + 1} {H_n}^2 - \paren {2 n + 1} H_n + 2 n$ where $H_k$ denotes the $k$th harmonic number.
Consider: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac k {k + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac {\paren {k + 1} - 1} {k + 1} | c = factorizing }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} 1 - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac 1 {k + 1} | c = Sum of Summations equals Summat...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n {H_k}^2 = \paren {n + 1} {H_n}^2 - \paren {2 n + 1} H_n + 2 n$ where $H_k$ denotes the $k$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]].
Consider: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac k {k + 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac {\paren {k + 1} - 1} {k + 1} | c = factorizing }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} 1 - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{n - 1} \dfrac 1 {k + 1} | c = [[Sum of Summations equals Sum...
Summation to n of Square of kth Harmonic Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Square_of_kth_Harmonic_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_to_n_of_Square_of_kth_Harmonic_Number
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Sum of Summations equals Summation of Sum", "Summation of Unity over Elements", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Abel's Lemma", "Sum of Sequence of Harmonic Numbers", "Sum of Summations equals Summation of Sum", "Sum of Sequence of Harmonic Numbers" ]
proofwiki-14568
Summation of Odd Reciprocals in terms of Harmonic Numbers
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} = H_{2 n} - \dfrac {H_n} 2$ where $H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k} - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{2 n} \dfrac 1 k - \dfrac 1 2 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 k ...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} = H_{2 n} - \dfrac {H_n} 2$ where $H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k} - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{2 n} \dfrac 1 k - \dfrac 1 2 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 k ...
Summation of Odd Reciprocals in terms of Harmonic Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Odd_Reciprocals_in_terms_of_Harmonic_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Odd_Reciprocals_in_terms_of_Harmonic_Numbers
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers" ]
[]
proofwiki-14569
Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by Prime p
Let $p$ be an odd prime. Consider the harmonic number $H_{p - 1}$ expressed in canonical form. The numerator of $H_{p - 1}$ is divisible by $p$.
Add the terms of $H_{p - 1}$ using the definition of rational addition to obtain $\dfrac m n$. Do not cancel common prime factors from $m$ and $n$. It is seen that $n = \paren {p - 1}!$ Hence $p$ is not a divisor of $n$. The numerator $m$ is seen to be: :$m = \dfrac {\paren {p - 1}!} 1 + \dfrac {\paren {p - 1}!} 2 + \c...
Let $p$ be an [[Definition:Odd Prime|odd prime]]. Consider the [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] $H_{p - 1}$ expressed in [[Definition:Canonical Form of Rational Number|canonical form]]. The [[Definition:Numerator|numerator]] of $H_{p - 1}$ is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $p$.
Add the terms of $H_{p - 1}$ using the definition of [[Definition:Rational Addition|rational addition]] to obtain $\dfrac m n$. Do not cancel common [[Definition:Prime Factor|prime factors]] from $m$ and $n$. It is seen that $n = \paren {p - 1}!$ Hence $p$ is not a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisor]] of $n$. ...
Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by Prime p/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numerator_of_p-1th_Harmonic_Number_is_Divisible_by_Prime_p
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numerator_of_p-1th_Harmonic_Number_is_Divisible_by_Prime_p/Proof_1
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by Prime p" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Prime", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Rational Number/Canonical Form", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Rational Numbers", "Definition:Prime Factor", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Multiple/Integer", "Wilson's Theorem", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Inverse in Group is Unique", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set", "Closed For...
proofwiki-14570
Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by Prime p
Let $p$ be an odd prime. Consider the harmonic number $H_{p - 1}$ expressed in canonical form. The numerator of $H_{p - 1}$ is divisible by $p$.
Note that for any integer $x$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^p - x | o = \equiv | r = 0 | rr= \pmod p | c = Corollary $1$ to Fermat's Little Theorem }} {{eqn | o = \equiv | r = x^{\overline p} | rr= \pmod p | c = Divisibility of Product of Consecutive Integers }} {{eqn | o = \equ...
Let $p$ be an [[Definition:Odd Prime|odd prime]]. Consider the [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] $H_{p - 1}$ expressed in [[Definition:Canonical Form of Rational Number|canonical form]]. The [[Definition:Numerator|numerator]] of $H_{p - 1}$ is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisible]] by $p$.
Note that for any [[Definition:Integer|integer]] $x$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^p - x | o = \equiv | r = 0 | rr= \pmod p | c = [[Fermat's Little Theorem/Corollary 1|Corollary $1$ to Fermat's Little Theorem]] }} {{eqn | o = \equiv | r = x^{\overline p} | rr= \pmod p | c = [[Di...
Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by Prime p/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numerator_of_p-1th_Harmonic_Number_is_Divisible_by_Prime_p
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numerator_of_p-1th_Harmonic_Number_is_Divisible_by_Prime_p/Proof_2
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by Prime p" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Prime", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Rational Number/Canonical Form", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Fermat's Little Theorem/Corollary 1", "Divisibility of Product of Consecutive Integers", "Sum over k of Unsigned Stirling Numbers of First Kind by x^k", "Definition:Stirling Numbers of the First Kind/Unsigned", "Definition:Kronecker Delta", "Harmonic Number as Unsigned Stirling Nu...
proofwiki-14571
Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by p^2 for Prime Greater than 3
Let $p$ be a prime number such that $p > 3$. Consider the harmonic number $H_{p - 1}$ expressed in canonical form. The numerator of $H_{p - 1}$ is divisible by $p^2$.
{{ProofWanted|research and invoke Wolstenholme's Theorem}}
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] such that $p > 3$. Consider the [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] $H_{p - 1}$ expressed in [[Definition:Canonical Form of Rational Number|canonical form]]. The [[Definition:Numerator|numerator]] of $H_{p - 1}$ is [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divis...
{{ProofWanted|research and invoke [[Wolstenholme's Theorem]]}}
Numerator of p-1th Harmonic Number is Divisible by p^2 for Prime Greater than 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numerator_of_p-1th_Harmonic_Number_is_Divisible_by_p^2_for_Prime_Greater_than_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Numerator_of_p-1th_Harmonic_Number_is_Divisible_by_p^2_for_Prime_Greater_than_3
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Rational Number/Canonical Form", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Wolstenholme's Theorem" ]
proofwiki-14572
Highest Power of 2 Dividing Numerator of Sum of Odd Reciprocals
Let: : $S = \dfrac p q = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1}$ where $\dfrac p q$ is the canonical form of $S$. Let $n = 2^k m$ where $m$ is odd. Then the largest power of $2$ that divides $p$ is $2^{2 k}$.
We have that: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} = \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{M - 1} \paren {\dfrac 1 {i \times 2^{r + 1} + 1} + \dfrac 1 {i \times 2^{r + 1} + 3} + \cdots + \dfrac 1 {\paren {i + 1} \times 2^{r + 1} - 1} }$ where $k = 2^r M$ where $M$ is odd. Collect the $r$ terms in the parenthesis on the {{RH...
Let: : $S = \dfrac p q = \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1}$ where $\dfrac p q$ is the [[Definition:Canonical Form of Rational Number|canonical form]] of $S$. Let $n = 2^k m$ where $m$ is [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]]. Then the largest [[Definition:Integer Power|power of $2$]] that [[Definition:Divisor o...
We have that: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac 1 {2 k - 1} = \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^{M - 1} \paren {\dfrac 1 {i \times 2^{r + 1} + 1} + \dfrac 1 {i \times 2^{r + 1} + 3} + \cdots + \dfrac 1 {\paren {i + 1} \times 2^{r + 1} - 1} }$ where $k = 2^r M$ where $M$ is [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]]. Collect the $r$ terms i...
Highest Power of 2 Dividing Numerator of Sum of Odd Reciprocals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Highest_Power_of_2_Dividing_Numerator_of_Sum_of_Odd_Reciprocals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Highest_Power_of_2_Dividing_Numerator_of_Sum_of_Odd_Reciprocals
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Number/Canonical Form", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Parenthesis", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Residue", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)/Residue", "Definition:Odd Integer", "D...
proofwiki-14573
Summation of Power Series by Harmonic Sequence
Consider the power series: :$\map f x = \ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k x^k$ Let $\map f x$ converge for $x = x_0$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k H_k = \int_0^1 \dfrac {\map f {x_0} - \map f {x_0 y} } {1 - y} \rd y$ where $H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^1 \dfrac {\map f {x_0} - \map f {x_0 y} } {1 - y} \rd y | r = \int_0^1 \dfrac {\sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k - \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k y^k} {1 - y} \rd y | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k \int_0^1 \dfrac {1 - y^k} {1 - y} \rd y | ...
Consider the [[Definition:Power Series|power series]]: :$\map f x = \ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k x^k$ Let $\map f x$ [[Definition:Convergent Series of Numbers|converge]] for $x = x_0$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k H_k = \int_0^1 \dfrac {\map f {x_0} - \map f {x_0 y} } {1 - y} \rd y$ where $H_n$...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^1 \dfrac {\map f {x_0} - \map f {x_0 y} } {1 - y} \rd y | r = \int_0^1 \dfrac {\sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k - \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k y^k} {1 - y} \rd y | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} a_k {x_0}^k \int_0^1 \dfrac {1 - y^k} {1 - y} \rd y | ...
Summation of Power Series by Harmonic Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Power_Series_by_Harmonic_Sequence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_of_Power_Series_by_Harmonic_Sequence
[ "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Power Series", "Definition:Convergent Series/Number Field", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Primitive of Power" ]
proofwiki-14574
Summation over k to n of Harmonic Numbers over n+1-k
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {n + 1 - k} = {H_{n + 1} }^2 - H_{n + 1}^{\paren 2}$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th harmonic number :$H_n^{\paren 2}$ denotes a general harmonic number.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {n + 1 - k} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_{n + 1 - k} } k | c = Permutation of Indices of Summation }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^k \dfrac 1 {j \paren {n + 1 - k} } | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }} {{...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {n + 1 - k} = {H_{n + 1} }^2 - H_{n + 1}^{\paren 2}$ where: :$H_n$ denotes the $n$th [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number]] :$H_n^{\paren 2}$ denotes a [[Definition:General Harmonic Numbers|general harmonic number]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_k} {n + 1 - k} | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \dfrac {H_{n + 1 - k} } k | c = [[Permutation of Indices of Summation]] }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^k \dfrac 1 {j \paren {n + 1 - k} } | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }...
Summation over k to n of Harmonic Numbers over n+1-k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_k_to_n_of_Harmonic_Numbers_over_n+1-k
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_k_to_n_of_Harmonic_Numbers_over_n+1-k
[ "Harmonic Numbers", "General Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers/General Definition" ]
[ "Permutation of Indices of Summation" ]
proofwiki-14575
Extension of Harmonic Number to Non-Integer Argument
Let $\map H x$ be the real function defined as: :$\map H x = \gamma + \dfrac {\map {\Gamma'} {x + 1} } {\map \Gamma {x + 1} }$ where: :$\map \Gamma x$ denotes the Gamma function :$\map {\Gamma'} x$ denotes the derivative of the Gamma function :$\gamma$ denotes the Euler-Mascheroni constant. Then $H$ is an extension of ...
For $n \in \N$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map H n | r = \gamma + \frac {\map {\Gamma'} {n + 1} } {\map \Gamma {n + 1} } }} {{eqn | r = \gamma - \gamma + \sum_{m \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {\frac 1 m - \frac 1 {n + m} } | c = Reciprocal times Derivative of Gamma Function }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{k \mathop \to \...
Let $\map H x$ be the [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] defined as: :$\map H x = \gamma + \dfrac {\map {\Gamma'} {x + 1} } {\map \Gamma {x + 1} }$ where: :$\map \Gamma x$ denotes the [[Definition:Gamma Function|Gamma function]] :$\map {\Gamma'} x$ denotes the [[Definition:Derivative|derivative]] of the [[Defin...
For $n \in \N$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map H n | r = \gamma + \frac {\map {\Gamma'} {n + 1} } {\map \Gamma {n + 1} } }} {{eqn | r = \gamma - \gamma + \sum_{m \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {\frac 1 m - \frac 1 {n + m} } | c = [[Reciprocal times Derivative of Gamma Function]] }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{k \mathop ...
Extension of Harmonic Number to Non-Integer Argument
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Harmonic_Number_to_Non-Integer_Argument
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Harmonic_Number_to_Non-Integer_Argument
[ "Gamma Function", "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Gamma Function", "Definition:Derivative", "Definition:Gamma Function", "Definition:Euler-Mascheroni Constant", "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Reciprocal times Derivative of Gamma Function", "Linear Combination of Convergent Series" ]
proofwiki-14576
Initial Segment Determined by Smallest Element is Empty
Let $\struct {S, \preceq}$ be a well-ordered set, where $S$ is non-empty. Let $s_0 = \min S$, the smallest element of $S$. Then the initial segment determined by $s_0$, $S_{s_0}$, is empty.
By the definition of initial segment: :$S_{s_0} := \set {b \in S: b \prec s_0}$ By the definition of smallest element: :$\forall b \in S: s_0 \preceq b$ Thus $S_{s_0}$ is empty. {{qed}} Category:Initial Segments Category:Well-Orderings cxsawbph07ijlb2ilxdcb4u5ecu9848
Let $\struct {S, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered set]], where $S$ is [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]]. Let $s_0 = \min S$, the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]] of $S$. Then the [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segment determined by $s_0$]], $S_{s_0}$, is [[Definiti...
By the definition of [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial segment]]: :$S_{s_0} := \set {b \in S: b \prec s_0}$ By the definition of [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest element]]: :$\forall b \in S: s_0 \preceq b$ Thus $S_{s_0}$ is [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Initial Segments]] [[Category:...
Initial Segment Determined by Smallest Element is Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Segment_Determined_by_Smallest_Element_is_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Segment_Determined_by_Smallest_Element_is_Empty
[ "Initial Segments", "Well-Orderings" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Empty Set", "Category:Initial Segments", "Category:Well-Orderings" ]
proofwiki-14577
Strictly Increasing Mapping Between Wosets Implies Order Isomorphism
Let $J$ and $E$ be well-ordered sets. Let there exist a mapping $k: J \to E$ which is strictly increasing. Then $J$ is order isomorphic to $E$ or an initial segment of $E$.
If the sets considered are empty or singletons, the theorem holds vacuously or trivially. Suppose $J, E$ both have at least two elements. Let $e_0 = \min E$, the smallest element of $E$. Define the mapping: :$h: J \to E$: :$\map h \alpha = \begin {cases} \map \min {E \setminus h \sqbrk {S_\alpha} } & : h \sqbrk {S_\alp...
Let $J$ and $E$ be [[Definition:Well-Ordered Set|well-ordered sets]]. Let there exist a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $k: J \to E$ which is [[Definition:Strictly Increasing Mapping|strictly increasing]]. Then $J$ is [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphic]] to $E$ or an [[Definition:Initial Segment|initial ...
If the [[Definition:Set|sets]] considered are [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]] or [[Definition:Singleton|singletons]], the theorem holds [[Definition:Vacuous|vacuously]] or trivially. Suppose $J, E$ both have at least two [[Definition:Element|elements]]. Let $e_0 = \min E$, the [[Definition:Smallest Element|smallest e...
Strictly Increasing Mapping Between Wosets Implies Order Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Strictly_Increasing_Mapping_Between_Wosets_Implies_Order_Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Strictly_Increasing_Mapping_Between_Wosets_Implies_Order_Isomorphism
[ "Well-Orderings" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Strictly Increasing/Mapping", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Initial Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Vacuous", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Principle of Recursive Definition for Well-Ordered Sets"...
proofwiki-14578
Equality to Initial Segment Imposes Well-Ordering
Let $X$ be a set. Let $\AA$ be the set of all ordered pairs $\struct {A, <}$ such that $A$ is a subset of $X$ and $<$ is a strict well-ordering of $A$. Define $\prec$ as: :$\struct {A, <} \prec \struct {A', <'}$ {{iff}} :$\struct {A, <}$ equals an initial segment of $\struct {A', <'}$. Let $\BB$ be a set of ordered pa...
If the set $X$ considered is empty or a singleton, the lemma holds vacuously or trivially. Thus assume $X$ contains at least two elements. We first prove that $\prec$ is a strict partial ordering on $\AA$. From the definition of initial segment, no $\struct {A, <}$ can equal an initial segment of itself. Thus $\prec$ i...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\AA$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Ordered Pair|ordered pairs]] $\struct {A, <}$ such that $A$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $X$ and $<$ is a [[Definition:Strict Well-Ordering|strict well-ordering]] of $A$. Define $\prec$ as: :$\struct {A, <} \prec...
If the [[Definition:Set|set]] $X$ considered is [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]] or a [[Definition:Singleton|singleton]], the [[Definition:Lemma|lemma]] holds [[Definition:Vacuous|vacuously]] or trivially. Thus assume $X$ contains at least two [[Definition:Element|elements]]. We first prove that $\prec$ is a [[Definit...
Equality to Initial Segment Imposes Well-Ordering
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equality_to_Initial_Segment_Imposes_Well-Ordering
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equality_to_Initial_Segment_Imposes_Well-Ordering
[ "Well-Orderings", "Set Equality" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Strict Well-Ordering", "Definition:Equals", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Order", "Definition:Union", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:R...
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Lemma", "Definition:Vacuous", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Strict Partial Ordering", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Initial Segment", "Definition:Antireflexive Relation", "Definition:Initial Segment", ...
proofwiki-14579
Empty Mapping is Injective
Let $\nu: \O \to T$ be an empty mapping. Then $\nu$ is an injection.
There are no elements in the domain of $\nu$. Thus $\nu$ is an injection vacuously. {{qed}}
Let $\nu: \O \to T$ be an [[Definition:Empty Mapping|empty mapping]]. Then $\nu$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]].
There are no [[Definition:Element|elements]] in the [[Definition:Domain of Mapping|domain]] of $\nu$. Thus $\nu$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]] [[Definition:Vacuous Truth|vacuously]]. {{qed}}
Empty Mapping is Injective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Mapping_is_Injective
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Mapping_is_Injective
[ "Injections", "Empty Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Empty Mapping", "Definition:Injection" ]
[ "Definition:Element", "Definition:Domain (Set Theory)/Mapping", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Vacuous Truth" ]
proofwiki-14580
Upper and Lower Bound of Fibonacci Number
For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$: :$\phi^{n - 2} \le F_n \le \phi^{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ is the $n$th Fibonacci number :$\phi$ is the golden section: $\phi = \dfrac {1 + \sqrt 5} 2$
From Fibonacci Number greater than Golden Section to Power less Two: :$F_n \ge \phi^{n - 2}$ From Fibonacci Number less than Golden Section to Power less One: :$F_n \le \phi^{n - 1}$ {{qed}}
For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$: :$\phi^{n - 2} \le F_n \le \phi^{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ is the $n$th [[Definition:Fibonacci Numbers|Fibonacci number]] :$\phi$ is the [[Definition:Golden Section|golden section]]: $\phi = \dfrac {1 + \sqrt 5} 2$
From [[Fibonacci Number greater than Golden Section to Power less Two]]: :$F_n \ge \phi^{n - 2}$ From [[Fibonacci Number less than Golden Section to Power less One]]: :$F_n \le \phi^{n - 1}$ {{qed}}
Upper and Lower Bound of Fibonacci Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_and_Lower_Bound_of_Fibonacci_Number
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_and_Lower_Bound_of_Fibonacci_Number
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Golden Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Golden Mean" ]
[ "Fibonacci Number greater than Golden Section to Power less Two", "Fibonacci Number less than Golden Section to Power less One" ]
proofwiki-14581
Generating Function for Fibonacci Numbers
Let $\map G z$ be the function defined as: :$\map G z = \dfrac z {1 - z - z^2}$ Then $\map G z$ is a generating function for the Fibonacci numbers.
Let the form of $\map G z$ be assumed as: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map G z | r = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} F_k z^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = F_0 + F_1 z + F_2 z^2 + F_3 z^3 + F_4 z^4 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = 0 + z + z^2 + 2 z^3 + 3 z^4 + \cdots | c = }} {{end-eqn}} where $F_n$ denotes the $n$t...
Let $\map G z$ be the [[Definition:Real Function|function]] defined as: :$\map G z = \dfrac z {1 - z - z^2}$ Then $\map G z$ is a [[Definition:Generating Function|generating function]] for the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]].
Let the form of $\map G z$ be assumed as: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map G z | r = \sum_{k \mathop \ge 0} F_k z^k | c = }} {{eqn | r = F_0 + F_1 z + F_2 z^2 + F_3 z^3 + F_4 z^4 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = 0 + z + z^2 + 2 z^3 + 3 z^4 + \cdots | c = }} {{end-eqn}} where $F_n$ denotes the [[...
Generating Function for Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Generating_Function_for_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Generating_Function_for_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Examples of Generating Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Generating Function", "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
proofwiki-14582
Summation over k to n of Product of kth with n-kth Fibonacci Numbers
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n F_k F_{n - k} = \dfrac {\paren {n - 1} F_n + 2n F_{n - 1} } 5$ where $F_n$ denotes the $n$th Fibonacci number.
From Generating Function for Fibonacci Numbers, a generating function for the Fibonacci numbers is: :$\map G z = \dfrac z {1 - z - z^2}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map G z | r = \dfrac z {1 - z - z^2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 5} \paren {\dfrac 1 {1 - \phi z} - \dfrac 1 {1 - \hat \phi z} }...
:$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n F_k F_{n - k} = \dfrac {\paren {n - 1} F_n + 2n F_{n - 1} } 5$ where $F_n$ denotes the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|$n$th Fibonacci number]].
From [[Generating Function for Fibonacci Numbers]], a [[Definition:Generating Function|generating function]] for the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]] is: :$\map G z = \dfrac z {1 - z - z^2}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map G z | r = \dfrac z {1 - z - z^2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfra...
Summation over k to n of Product of kth with n-kth Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_k_to_n_of_Product_of_kth_with_n-kth_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Summation_over_k_to_n_of_Product_of_kth_with_n-kth_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Generating Function for Fibonacci Numbers", "Definition:Generating Function", "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Partial Fractions Expansion", "Power Series Expansion for Reciprocal of Square of 1 - z", "Generating Function for Fibonacci Numbers", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", ...
proofwiki-14583
Fibonacci Numbers which equal their Index
The only Fibonacci numbers which equal their index are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{eqn | l = F_5 | r = 5 }} {{end-eqn}}
By definition of the Fibonacci numbers: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{end-eqn}} Then it is observed that $F_5 = 5$. After that, for $n > 5$, we have that $F_n > n$. {{qed}}
The only [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]] which equal their [[Definition:Index (Indexing Set)|index]] are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{eqn | l = F_5 | r = 5 }} {{end-eqn}}
By definition of the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{end-eqn}} Then it is observed that $F_5 = 5$. After that, for $n > 5$, we have that $F_n > n$. {{qed}}
Fibonacci Numbers which equal their Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Numbers_which_equal_their_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Numbers_which_equal_their_Index
[ "Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Indexing Set/Index" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
proofwiki-14584
Fibonacci Numbers which equal the Square of their Index
The only Fibonacci numbers which equal the square of their index are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{eqn | l = F_{12} | r = 12^2 = 144 }} {{end-eqn}}
By definition of the Fibonacci numbers: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{end-eqn}} Then it is observed that $F_{12} = 144$. After that, for $n > 12$, we have that $F_n > n^2$. {{qed}}
The only [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]] which equal the [[Definition:Square (Algebra)|square]] of their [[Definition:Index (Indexing Set)|index]] are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{eqn | l = F_{12} | r = 12^2 = 144 }} {{end-eqn}}
By definition of the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = F_1 | r = 1 }} {{end-eqn}} Then it is observed that $F_{12} = 144$. After that, for $n > 12$, we have that $F_n > n^2$. {{qed}}
Fibonacci Numbers which equal the Square of their Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Numbers_which_equal_the_Square_of_their_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Numbers_which_equal_the_Square_of_their_Index
[ "Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Square/Function", "Definition:Indexing Set/Index" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
proofwiki-14585
Cassini's Identity/Negative Indices
Let $n \in \Z_{<0}$ be a negative integer. Let $F_n$ be the $n$th Fibonacci number (as extended to negative integers). Then Cassini's Identity: :$F_{n + 1} F_{n - 1} - F_n^2 = \paren {-1}^n$ continues to hold.
Let $n \in \Z_{> 0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{-\paren {n + 1} } F_{-\paren {n - 1} } - {F_{-n} }^2 | r = \paren {-1}^{n + 2} F_{n + 1} \paren {-1}^n F_{n - 1} - \paren {\paren {-1}^{n + 1} F_n}^2 | c = Fibonacci Number with Negative Index }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-1}^{2 n + 2} F_{n + 1} F_{n - 1} -...
Let $n \in \Z_{<0}$ be a [[Definition:Negative Integer|negative integer]]. Let $F_n$ be the $n$th [[Definition:Fibonacci Number for Negative Index|Fibonacci number (as extended to negative integers)]]. Then [[Cassini's Identity]]: :$F_{n + 1} F_{n - 1} - F_n^2 = \paren {-1}^n$ continues to hold.
Let $n \in \Z_{> 0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{-\paren {n + 1} } F_{-\paren {n - 1} } - {F_{-n} }^2 | r = \paren {-1}^{n + 2} F_{n + 1} \paren {-1}^n F_{n - 1} - \paren {\paren {-1}^{n + 1} F_n}^2 | c = [[Fibonacci Number with Negative Index]] }} {{eqn | r = \paren {-1}^{2 n + 2} F_{n + 1} F_{n ...
Cassini's Identity/Negative Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cassini's_Identity/Negative_Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cassini's_Identity/Negative_Indices
[ "Cassini's Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Negative/Integer", "Definition:Fibonacci Number/Negative", "Cassini's Identity" ]
[ "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Even Power" ]
proofwiki-14586
Honsberger's Identity/Negative Indices
Let $n \in \Z_{< 0}$ be a negative integer. Let $F_n$ be the $n$th Fibonacci number (as extended to negative integers). Then Honsberger's Identity: :$F_{m + n} = F_{m - 1} F_n + F_m F_{n + 1}$ continues to hold, whether $m$ or $n$ are positive or negative.
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\le 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$F_{m + n} = F_{m - 1} F_n + F_m F_{n + 1}$ This can equivalently be written: For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$F_{m - n} = F_{m - 1} F_{-n} + F_m F_{-n + 1}$ $\map P 0$ is the case: {{begin-e...
Let $n \in \Z_{< 0}$ be a [[Definition:Negative Integer|negative integer]]. Let $F_n$ be the $n$th [[Definition:Fibonacci Number for Negative Index|Fibonacci number (as extended to negative integers)]]. Then [[Honsberger's Identity]]: :$F_{m + n} = F_{m - 1} F_n + F_m F_{n + 1}$ continues to hold, whether $m$ or $n...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\le 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$F_{m + n} = F_{m - 1} F_n + F_m F_{n + 1}$ This can equivalently be written: For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition...
Honsberger's Identity/Negative Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Honsberger's_Identity/Negative_Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Honsberger's_Identity/Negative_Indices
[ "Honsberger's Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Negative/Integer", "Definition:Fibonacci Number/Negative", "Honsberger's Identity", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Negative/Integer" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-14587
Euler-Binet Formula/Negative Index
Let $n \in \Z_{< 0}$ be a negative integer. Let $F_n$ be the $n$th Fibonacci number (as extended to negative integers). Then the Euler-Binet Formula: :$F_n = \dfrac {\phi^n - \hat \phi^n} {\sqrt 5} = \dfrac {\phi^n - \hat \phi^n} {\phi - \hat \phi}$ continues to hold.
Let $n \in \Z_{> 0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac {\phi^{-n} - \hat \phi^{-n} } {\sqrt 5} | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 5} \paren {\phi^{-n} - \paren {-\dfrac 1 \phi}^{-n} } | c = Definition of $\hat \phi$ }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 5} \paren {\dfrac 1 {\phi^n} - \paren {-1}^n \phi^n} | c = Exp...
Let $n \in \Z_{< 0}$ be a [[Definition:Negative Integer|negative integer]]. Let $F_n$ be the $n$th [[Definition:Fibonacci Number for Negative Index|Fibonacci number (as extended to negative integers)]]. Then the [[Euler-Binet Formula]]: :$F_n = \dfrac {\phi^n - \hat \phi^n} {\sqrt 5} = \dfrac {\phi^n - \hat \phi^n}...
Let $n \in \Z_{> 0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac {\phi^{-n} - \hat \phi^{-n} } {\sqrt 5} | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 5} \paren {\phi^{-n} - \paren {-\dfrac 1 \phi}^{-n} } | c = Definition of $\hat \phi$ }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 5} \paren {\dfrac 1 {\phi^n} - \paren {-1}^n \phi^n} | c = [...
Euler-Binet Formula/Negative Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler-Binet_Formula/Negative_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler-Binet_Formula/Negative_Index
[ "Euler-Binet Formula" ]
[ "Definition:Negative/Integer", "Definition:Fibonacci Number/Negative", "Euler-Binet Formula" ]
[ "Exponent Combination Laws/Negative Power", "Euler-Binet Formula", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index" ]
proofwiki-14588
Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less
Let $n \in \Z$. Then: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the $n$th Fibonacci number :$\phi$ denotes the golden mean.
=== Positive Index === First the result is proved for positive integers. {{:Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Positive Index}}{{qed|lemma}}
Let $n \in \Z$. Then: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|$n$th Fibonacci number]] :$\phi$ denotes the [[Definition:Golden Mean|golden mean]].
=== [[Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Positive Index|Positive Index]] === First the result is proved for [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]]. {{:Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Positive Index}}{{qed|lemma}}
Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Golden Mean", "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Golden Mean" ]
[ "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Positive Index", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
proofwiki-14589
Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Positive Index
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the $n$th Fibonacci number :$\phi$ denotes the golden mean.
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $P \left({n}\right)$ be the proposition: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ $P \left({0}\right)$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 \times \phi + F_{-1} | r = F_0 \times \phi + \left({-1}\right)^0 F_1 | c = Fibonacci Number with Negative...
Let $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$. Then: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|$n$th Fibonacci number]] :$\phi$ denotes the [[Definition:Golden Mean|golden mean]].
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $P \left({n}\right)$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ $P \left({0}\right)$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_0 \times \phi + F_{-1} | r = F_0 \times \p...
Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Positive Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less/Positive_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less/Positive_Index
[ "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Golden Mean" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Square of Golden Mean equals One plus Golden Mean", "Fibonacci Number by Golden...
proofwiki-14590
Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Negative Index
Let $n \in \Z_{\le 0}$. Then: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the $n$th Fibonacci number as extended to negative indices :$\phi$ denotes the golden mean.
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\le 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ This can equivalently be expressed as: For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\phi^{-n} = F_{-n} \phi + F_{-n - 1}$ $\map P 0$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l =...
Let $n \in \Z_{\le 0}$. Then: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number for Negative Index|$n$th Fibonacci number as extended to negative indices]] :$\phi$ denotes the [[Definition:Golden Mean|golden mean]].
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\le 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\phi^n = F_n \phi + F_{n - 1}$ This can equivalently be expressed as: For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposi...
Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less/Negative Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less/Negative_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less/Negative_Index
[ "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number/Negative", "Definition:Golden Mean" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Proposition", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Fibonacci Number with Nega...
proofwiki-14591
Fibonacci Number by One Minus Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less
Let $n \in \Z$. Then: :$\hat \phi^n = F_n \hat \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the $n$th Fibonacci number :$\hat \phi$ denotes the $1$ minus the golden mean: ::$\hat \phi := 1 - \phi$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_n \hat \phi + F_{n - 1} | r = F_n \paren {-\dfrac 1 \phi} + F_{n - 1} | c = Reciprocal Form of One Minus Golden Mean }} {{eqn | r = -\dfrac 1 \phi \paren {F_n - \phi F_{n - 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\dfrac 1 \phi \paren {\paren {-1}^{n + 1} F_{-n} - \phi \paren {-1}^n F_{...
Let $n \in \Z$. Then: :$\hat \phi^n = F_n \hat \phi + F_{n - 1}$ where: :$F_n$ denotes the [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|$n$th Fibonacci number]] :$\hat \phi$ denotes the [[Definition:One Minus Golden Mean|$1$ minus the golden mean]]: ::$\hat \phi := 1 - \phi$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_n \hat \phi + F_{n - 1} | r = F_n \paren {-\dfrac 1 \phi} + F_{n - 1} | c = [[Reciprocal Form of One Minus Golden Mean]] }} {{eqn | r = -\dfrac 1 \phi \paren {F_n - \phi F_{n - 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\dfrac 1 \phi \paren {\paren {-1}^{n + 1} F_{-n} - \phi \paren {-1}^n...
Fibonacci Number by One Minus Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_One_Minus_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_by_One_Minus_Golden_Mean_plus_Fibonacci_Number_of_Index_One_Less
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Golden Mean", "Fibonacci Number by One Minus Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less" ]
[ "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Golden Mean/One Minus Golden Mean" ]
[ "Reciprocal Form of One Minus Golden Mean", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Fibonacci Number by Golden Mean plus Fibonacci Number of Index One Less" ]
proofwiki-14592
Reciprocal Form of One Minus Golden Mean
:$\hat \phi = - \dfrac 1 \phi$ where: :$\phi$ denotes the golden mean :$\hat \phi$ denotes one minus the golden mean: $\hat \phi = 1 - \phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \hat \phi | r = 1 - \phi | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\left({\phi - 1}\right) | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\frac 1 \phi | c = {{Defof|Golden Mean|index = 3}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Golden Mean k9cbb5cuwgltozh1uhujnnwmhw70wd4
:$\hat \phi = - \dfrac 1 \phi$ where: :$\phi$ denotes the [[Definition:Golden Mean|golden mean]] :$\hat \phi$ denotes [[Definition:One Minus Golden Mean|one minus the golden mean]]: $\hat \phi = 1 - \phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \hat \phi | r = 1 - \phi | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\left({\phi - 1}\right) | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\frac 1 \phi | c = {{Defof|Golden Mean|index = 3}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Golden Mean]] k9cbb5cuwgltozh1uhujnnwmhw70wd4
Reciprocal Form of One Minus Golden Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Form_of_One_Minus_Golden_Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Form_of_One_Minus_Golden_Mean
[ "Golden Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Golden Mean", "Definition:Golden Mean/One Minus Golden Mean" ]
[ "Category:Golden Mean" ]
proofwiki-14593
Closed Form of One Minus Golden Mean
:$\hat \phi = \dfrac {1 - \sqrt 5} 2$ where: :$\hat \phi$ denotes one minus the golden mean: $\hat \phi = 1 - \phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \hat \phi | r = 1 - \phi | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \dfrac {1 + \sqrt 5} 2 | c = {{Defof|Golden Mean|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {2 - \left({1 + \sqrt 5}\right)} 2 | c = common denominator }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 - \sqrt 5} 2 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Ca...
:$\hat \phi = \dfrac {1 - \sqrt 5} 2$ where: :$\hat \phi$ denotes [[Definition:One Minus Golden Mean|one minus the golden mean]]: $\hat \phi = 1 - \phi$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \hat \phi | r = 1 - \phi | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \dfrac {1 + \sqrt 5} 2 | c = {{Defof|Golden Mean|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {2 - \left({1 + \sqrt 5}\right)} 2 | c = common denominator }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 - \sqrt 5} 2 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [...
Closed Form of One Minus Golden Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Form_of_One_Minus_Golden_Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Form_of_One_Minus_Golden_Mean
[ "Golden Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Golden Mean/One Minus Golden Mean" ]
[ "Category:Golden Mean" ]
proofwiki-14594
Second Order Fibonacci Number in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
The second order Fibonacci number $\FF_n$ can be expressed in terms of Fibonacci numbers as: :$\dfrac {3 n + 3} 5 F_n - \dfrac n 5 F_{n + 1}$
Let $\map \GG z = \ds \sum_{n \mathop \ge 0} \mathop F_n z^n$ be a generating function for $\FF_n$. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 - z - z^2} \map \GG z | r = \paren {\FF_0 + \FF_1 z + \FF_2 z^2 + \FF_3 z^3 + \FF_4 z^4 + \cdots} | c = }} {{eqn | o = | ro= - | r = \paren {\FF...
The [[Definition:Second Order Fibonacci Number|second order Fibonacci number]] $\FF_n$ can be expressed in terms of [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]] as: :$\dfrac {3 n + 3} 5 F_n - \dfrac n 5 F_{n + 1}$
Let $\map \GG z = \ds \sum_{n \mathop \ge 0} \mathop F_n z^n$ be a [[Definition:Generating Function|generating function]] for $\FF_n$. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 - z - z^2} \map \GG z | r = \paren {\FF_0 + \FF_1 z + \FF_2 z^2 + \FF_3 z^3 + \FF_4 z^4 + \cdots} | c = }} {{eqn | o = ...
Second Order Fibonacci Number in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Order_Fibonacci_Number_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Order_Fibonacci_Number_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Second Order Fibonacci Number", "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Definition:Generating Function", "Definition:Generating Function", "Definition:Fibonacci Number", "Generating Function for Fibonacci Numbers", "Summation over k to n of Product of kth with n-kth Fibonacci Numbers" ]
proofwiki-14595
General Fibonacci Number in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
Let $r$ and $s$ be numbers, usually integers but not necessarily so limited. Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be the general Fibonacci sequence: :<nowiki>$a_n = \begin{cases} r & : n = 0 \\ s & : n = 1 \\ a_{n - 2} + a_{n - 1} & : n > 1 \end{cases}$</nowiki> Then $a_n$ can be expressed in Fibonacci numbers as: :$a_n = F_{n - 1} r...
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$a_n = F_{n - 1} r + F_n s$
Let $r$ and $s$ be [[Definition:Number|numbers]], usually [[Definition:Integer|integers]] but not necessarily so limited. Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be the [[Definition:General Fibonacci Sequence|general Fibonacci sequence]]: :<nowiki>$a_n = \begin{cases} r & : n = 0 \\ s & : n = 1 \\ a_{n - 2} + a_{n - 1} & : n > 1 \end{c...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$a_n = F_{n - 1} r + F_n s$
General Fibonacci Number in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/General_Fibonacci_Number_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/General_Fibonacci_Number_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:General Fibonacci Sequence", "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-14596
Fibonacci Number plus Constant in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
Let $c$ be a number. Let $\sequence {b_n}$ be the sequence defined as: :$b_n = \begin{cases} 0 & : n = 0 \\ 1 & : n = 1 \\ b_{n - 2} + b_{n - 1} + c & : n > 1 \end{cases}$ Then $\sequence {b_n}$ can be expressed in Fibonacci numbers as: :$b_n = c F_{n - 1} + \paren {c + 1} F_n - c$
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$b_n = c F_{n - 1} + \paren {c + 1} F_n - c$
Let $c$ be a [[Definition:Number|number]]. Let $\sequence {b_n}$ be the [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] defined as: :$b_n = \begin{cases} 0 & : n = 0 \\ 1 & : n = 1 \\ b_{n - 2} + b_{n - 1} + c & : n > 1 \end{cases}$ Then $\sequence {b_n}$ can be expressed in [[Definition:Fibonacci Number|Fibonacci numbers]] as: :...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$b_n = c F_{n - 1} + \paren {c + 1} F_n - c$
Fibonacci Number plus Constant in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_plus_Constant_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_plus_Constant_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-14597
Fibonacci Number plus Binomial Coefficient in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
Let $m \in \Z_{>0}$ be a positive integer. Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be the sequence defined as: :$a_n = \begin{cases} 0 & : n = 0 \\ 1 & : n = 1 \\ a_{n - 2} + a_{n - 1} + \dbinom {n - 2} m & : n > 1 \end{cases}$ where $\dbinom {n - 2} m$ denotes a binonial coefficient. Then $\sequence {a_n}$ can be expressed in Fibonacc...
The proof proceeds by induction. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$a_n = F_{m + 1} F_{n - 1} + \paren {F_{m + 2} + 1} F_n - \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^m \binom {n + m - k} k$
Let $m \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be the [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] defined as: :$a_n = \begin{cases} 0 & : n = 0 \\ 1 & : n = 1 \\ a_{n - 2} + a_{n - 1} + \dbinom {n - 2} m & : n > 1 \end{cases}$ where $\dbinom {n - 2} m$ denotes a [[Definition:Bin...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$a_n = F_{m + 1} F_{n - 1} + \paren {F_{m + 2} + 1} F_n - \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^m \binom {n + m - k} k$
Fibonacci Number plus Binomial Coefficient in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_plus_Binomial_Coefficient_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_plus_Binomial_Coefficient_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient", "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-14598
Fibonacci Number plus Arbitrary Function in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
Let $\map f n$ and $\map g n$ be arbitrary arithmetic functions. Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be the sequence defined as: :$a_n = \begin{cases} 0 & : n = 0 \\ 1 & : n = 1 \\ a_{n - 1} + a_{n - 2} + \map f {n - 2} & : n > 1 \end{cases}$ Let $\sequence {b_n}$ be the sequence defined as: :$b_n = \begin{cases} 0 & : n = 0 \\ 1 & ...
=== Lemma === {{:Fibonacci Number plus Arbitrary Function in terms of Fibonacci Numbers/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Hence also: :$b_n = F_n + \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 2} F_{n - k - 1} \map g k$ Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = c_n | r = F_n + \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 2} F_{n - k - 1} \paren {x \map f k + y \map g k...
Let $\map f n$ and $\map g n$ be arbitrary [[Definition:Arithmetic Function|arithmetic functions]]. Let $\sequence {a_n}$ be the [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] defined as: :$a_n = \begin{cases} 0 & : n = 0 \\ 1 & : n = 1 \\ a_{n - 1} + a_{n - 2} + \map f {n - 2} & : n > 1 \end{cases}$ Let $\sequence {b_n}$ be the ...
=== [[Fibonacci Number plus Arbitrary Function in terms of Fibonacci Numbers/Lemma|Lemma]] === {{:Fibonacci Number plus Arbitrary Function in terms of Fibonacci Numbers/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Hence also: :$b_n = F_n + \ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 2} F_{n - k - 1} \map g k$ Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = c_n ...
Fibonacci Number plus Arbitrary Function in terms of Fibonacci Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_plus_Arbitrary_Function_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fibonacci_Number_plus_Arbitrary_Function_in_terms_of_Fibonacci_Numbers
[ "Fibonacci Numbers", "Fibonacci Number plus Arbitrary Function in terms of Fibonacci Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Arithmetic Function", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Fibonacci Number" ]
[ "Fibonacci Number plus Arbitrary Function in terms of Fibonacci Numbers/Lemma" ]
proofwiki-14599
Vajda's Identity/Formulation 1
:$F_{n + i} F_{n + j} - F_n F_{n + i + j} = \paren {-1}^n F_i F_j$
From Honsberger's Identity: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{n + i} | r = F_n F_{i - 1} + F_{n + 1} F_i }} {{eqn | l = F_{n + j} | r = F_n F_{j - 1} + F_{n + 1} F_j }} {{eqn | l = F_{n + i + j} | r = F_{i - 1} F_{n + j} + F_i F_{n + j + 1} }} {{end-eqn}} Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = F_...
:$F_{n + i} F_{n + j} - F_n F_{n + i + j} = \paren {-1}^n F_i F_j$
From [[Honsberger's Identity]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = F_{n + i} | r = F_n F_{i - 1} + F_{n + 1} F_i }} {{eqn | l = F_{n + j} | r = F_n F_{j - 1} + F_{n + 1} F_j }} {{eqn | l = F_{n + i + j} | r = F_{i - 1} F_{n + j} + F_i F_{n + j + 1} }} {{end-eqn}} Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = ...
Vajda's Identity/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vajda's_Identity/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vajda's_Identity/Formulation_1
[ "Vajda's Identity" ]
[]
[ "Honsberger's Identity", "Fibonacci Number in terms of Larger Fibonacci Numbers", "Fibonacci Number with Negative Index", "Category:Vajda's Identity" ]