id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-15600
Order of Boolean Group is Power of 2
Let $G$ be a Boolean group. Let $\order G$ denote the order of $G$. Then: :$\order G = 2^n$ where $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ is a positive integer.
The case where $n = 0$ is clear: :$\order {\set e} = 1$ and $e^2 = e$. {{AimForCont}} $\order G = m \times 2^k$ for some odd integer $m$. Then $m$ itself has an odd prime $p$ as a integer (which may of course equal $m$ if $m$ is itself prime). Then by Cauchy's Lemma (Group Theory) there exists $g \in G$ such that $\ord...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Boolean Group|Boolean group]]. Let $\order G$ denote the [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] of $G$. Then: :$\order G = 2^n$ where $n \in \Z_{\ge 0}$ is a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]].
The case where $n = 0$ is clear: :$\order {\set e} = 1$ and $e^2 = e$. {{AimForCont}} $\order G = m \times 2^k$ for some [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]] $m$. Then $m$ itself has an [[Definition:Odd Prime|odd prime]] $p$ as a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|integer]] (which may of course equal $m$ if $m$ is it...
Order of Boolean Group is Power of 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_of_Boolean_Group_is_Power_of_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_of_Boolean_Group_is_Power_of_2
[ "Boolean Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Boolean Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Positive/Integer" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Odd Prime", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Odd Prime", "Cauchy's Lemma (Group Theory)", "Definition:Prime Factor", "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
proofwiki-15601
Subgroup of Index 2 contains all Squares of Group Elements
Let $G$ be a group. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ whose index is $2$. Then: :$\forall x \in G: x^2 \in H$
By Subgroup of Index 2 is Normal, $H$ is normal in $G$. Hence the quotient group $G / H$ exists. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in G | l = \paren {x^2} H | r = \paren {x H}^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = H | c = as $G / H$ is of order $2$ }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$ whose [[Definition:Index of Subgroup|index]] is $2$. Then: :$\forall x \in G: x^2 \in H$
By [[Subgroup of Index 2 is Normal]], $H$ is [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal]] in $G$. Hence the [[Definition:Quotient Group|quotient group]] $G / H$ exists. Then we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in G | l = \paren {x^2} H | r = \paren {x H}^2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = H | c = as $...
Subgroup of Index 2 contains all Squares of Group Elements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Index_2_contains_all_Squares_of_Group_Elements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Index_2_contains_all_Squares_of_Group_Elements
[ "Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Index of Subgroup" ]
[ "Subgroup of Index 2 is Normal", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Quotient Group", "Definition:Order of Structure" ]
proofwiki-15602
Subgroup of Index 3 does not necessarily contain all Cubes of Group Elements
Let $G$ be a group. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ whose index is $3$. Then it is not necessarily the case that: :$\forall x \in G: x^3 \in H$
Proof by Counterexample: Consider $S_3$, the symmetric group on $3$ letters. From Subgroups of Symmetric Group on 3 Letters, the subsets of $S_3$ which form subgroups of $S_3$ are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = S_3 }} {{eqn | o = | r = \set e }} {{eqn | o = | r = \set {e, \tuple {123}, \tuple {13...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$ whose [[Definition:Index of Subgroup|index]] is $3$. Then it is not necessarily the case that: :$\forall x \in G: x^3 \in H$
[[Proof by Counterexample]]: Consider $S_3$, the [[Definition:Symmetric Group on 3 Letters|symmetric group on $3$ letters]]. From [[Subgroups of Symmetric Group on 3 Letters]], the [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S_3$ which form [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroups]] of $S_3$ are: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r =...
Subgroup of Index 3 does not necessarily contain all Cubes of Group Elements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Index_3_does_not_necessarily_contain_all_Cubes_of_Group_Elements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Index_3_does_not_necessarily_contain_all_Cubes_of_Group_Elements
[ "Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Index of Subgroup" ]
[ "Proof by Counterexample", "Symmetric Group on 3 Letters", "Symmetric Group on 3 Letters/Subgroups", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Index of Subgroup" ]
proofwiki-15603
Center of Non-Abelian Group of Order pq is Trivial
Let $p$ and $q$ be distinct prime numbers. Let $G$ be a non-abelian group of order $p q$ whose identity is $e$. Then the center of $G$ is trivial: :$\map Z G = \set e$
From Center of Group is Normal Subgroup, $\map Z G$ is a normal subgroup of $G$. By Lagrange's Theorem, the order of $\map Z G$ is either $1$, $p$, $q$ or $p q$. Because $G$ is not abelian, $G \ne \map Z G$. Hence $\order {\map Z G} \ne p q$. From Quotient of Group by Center Cyclic implies Abelian: :$G / \map Z G$ cann...
Let $p$ and $q$ be [[Definition:Distinct Elements|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]]. Let $G$ be a non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]] [[Definition:Group|group]] of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $p q$ whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] is $e$. Then the [[Definition:Center of ...
From [[Center of Group is Normal Subgroup]], $\map Z G$ is a [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $G$. By [[Definition:Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)|Lagrange's Theorem]], the [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] of $\map Z G$ is either $1$, $p$, $q$ or $p q$. Because $G$ is not [[Definition:Abelian Gr...
Center of Non-Abelian Group of Order pq is Trivial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Non-Abelian_Group_of_Order_pq_is_Trivial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Non-Abelian_Group_of_Order_pq_is_Trivial
[ "Centers of Groups", "Groups of Order p q" ]
[ "Definition:Distinct/Plural", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Group", "Definition:Trivial Subgroup" ]
[ "Center of Group is Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Quotient of Group by Center Cyclic implies Abelian", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Trivial Subgroup", "Definition:Centralize...
proofwiki-15604
Number of Elements of Order p in Group of Order pq is Multiple of q
Let $p$ and $q$ be distinct prime numbers. Let $G$ be a non-abelian group of order $p q$. Then the number of elements of $G$ of order $p$ is a multiple of $q$.
Let $x$ be an element of $G$ of order $p$. From Center of Non-Abelian Group of Order pq is Trivial: :$p \notin \map Z G$ where $\map Z G$ denotes the center of $G$. As $x \notin \map Z G$: :$\map C x \subsetneq G$ where $\map C x$ is the centralizer of $x$. From Order of Element divides Order of Centralizer: :$p \divid...
Let $p$ and $q$ be [[Definition:Distinct Elements|distinct]] [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]]. Let $G$ be a non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]] [[Definition:Group|group]] of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $p q$. Then the number of [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $G$ of order $p$ is a [[Definiti...
Let $x$ be an [[Definition:Element|element]] of $G$ of order $p$. From [[Center of Non-Abelian Group of Order pq is Trivial]]: :$p \notin \map Z G$ where $\map Z G$ denotes the [[Definition:Center of Group|center]] of $G$. As $x \notin \map Z G$: :$\map C x \subsetneq G$ where $\map C x$ is the [[Definition:Centraliz...
Number of Elements of Order p in Group of Order pq is Multiple of q
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Elements_of_Order_p_in_Group_of_Order_pq_is_Multiple_of_q
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Elements_of_Order_p_in_Group_of_Order_pq_is_Multiple_of_q
[ "Groups of Order p q" ]
[ "Definition:Distinct/Plural", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Integral Multiple/Real Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Element", "Center of Non-Abelian Group of Order pq is Trivial", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Group", "Definition:Centralizer/Group Element", "Order of Element divides Order of Centralizer", "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Number of Conjugates is Number of Cosets of Centralizer...
proofwiki-15605
Intersection of Normal Subgroup with Center in p-Group
Let $p$ be a prime number Let $G$ be a $p$-group. Let $N$ be a non-trivial normal subgroup of $G$. Let $\map Z G$ denote the center of $G$. Then: :$N \cap \map Z G$ is a non-trivial normal subgroup of $G$.
First we note that: :Center of Group is Normal Subgroup and from Intersection of Normal Subgroups is Normal: :$N \cap \map Z G$ is normal in $G$. Suppose $G$ is abelian. By definition: :$\map Z G = G$ Then: :$N \cap \map Z G = N$ which is non-trivial. From Prime Group is Cyclic and Cyclic Group is Abelian, this will al...
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] Let $G$ be a [[Definition:P-Group|$p$-group]]. Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Non-Trivial Subgroup|non-trivial]] [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $G$. Let $\map Z G$ denote the [[Definition:Center of Group|center]] of $G$. Then: :$N \cap \map Z G$ i...
First we note that: :[[Center of Group is Normal Subgroup]] and from [[Intersection of Normal Subgroups is Normal]]: :$N \cap \map Z G$ is [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal]] in $G$. Suppose $G$ is [[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]]. By definition: :$\map Z G = G$ Then: :$N \cap \map Z G = N$ which is [[Defini...
Intersection of Normal Subgroup with Center in p-Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Normal_Subgroup_with_Center_in_p-Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Normal_Subgroup_with_Center_in_p-Group
[ "Normal Subgroups", "P-Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:P-Group", "Definition:Non-Trivial Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Group", "Definition:Non-Trivial Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Center of Group is Normal Subgroup", "Intersection of Normal Subgroups is Normal", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Non-Trivial Subgroup", "Prime Group is Cyclic", "Cyclic Group is Abelian", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Center of Group of Prime Power Order is No...
proofwiki-15606
Normal Subgroup of p-Group of Order p is Subset of Center
Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $G$ be a $p$-group. Let $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$ of order $p$. Then: :$N \subseteq \map Z G$ where $\map Z G$ denotes the center of $G$.
From Intersection of Normal Subgroup with Center in p-Group: :$\order {N \cap \map Z G} > 1$ From Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup, $N \cap \map Z G$ is a subgroup of $N$. It follows from Lagrange's Theorem that: :$\order {N \cap \map Z G} = p$ and so: :$N \cap \map Z G = N$ But from Intersection of Subgroups is S...
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Let $G$ be a [[Definition:P-Group|$p$-group]]. Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $G$ of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $p$. Then: :$N \subseteq \map Z G$ where $\map Z G$ denotes the [[Definition:Center of Group|center]] of $G$...
From [[Intersection of Normal Subgroup with Center in p-Group]]: :$\order {N \cap \map Z G} > 1$ From [[Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup]], $N \cap \map Z G$ is a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $N$. It follows from [[Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)|Lagrange's Theorem]] that: :$\order {N \cap \map Z G} = p...
Normal Subgroup of p-Group of Order p is Subset of Center
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Subgroup_of_p-Group_of_Order_p_is_Subset_of_Center
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Subgroup_of_p-Group_of_Order_p_is_Subset_of_Center
[ "Normal Subgroups", "Centers of Groups", "P-Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:P-Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Group" ]
[ "Intersection of Normal Subgroup with Center in p-Group", "Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup" ]
proofwiki-15607
Non-Abelian Group of Order p Cubed has Exactly One Normal Subgroup of Order p
Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $G$ be a non-abelian group of order $p^3$. Then $G$ contains exactly one normal subgroup of order $p$.
From Center of Group of Prime Power Order is Non-Trivial, $\map Z G$ is not the trivial subgroup. From Quotient of Group by Center Cyclic implies Abelian, $G / \map G Z$ cannot be cyclic and non-trivial. Thus $\order {G / \map G Z}$ cannot be $p$ and so must be $p^2$. Thus $\order {\map G Z} = p$. Let $N$ be a normal s...
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Let $G$ be a non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian group]] of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $p^3$. Then $G$ contains [[Definition:Unique|exactly one]] [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $p$.
From [[Center of Group of Prime Power Order is Non-Trivial]], $\map Z G$ is not the [[Definition:Trivial Subgroup|trivial subgroup]]. From [[Quotient of Group by Center Cyclic implies Abelian]], $G / \map G Z$ cannot be [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic]] and [[Definition:Non-Trivial Subgroup|non-trivial]]. Thus $\ord...
Non-Abelian Group of Order p Cubed has Exactly One Normal Subgroup of Order p
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Group_of_Order_p_Cubed_has_Exactly_One_Normal_Subgroup_of_Order_p
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Group_of_Order_p_Cubed_has_Exactly_One_Normal_Subgroup_of_Order_p
[ "P-Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Order of Structure" ]
[ "Center of Group of Prime Power Order is Non-Trivial", "Definition:Trivial Subgroup", "Quotient of Group by Center Cyclic implies Abelian", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Non-Trivial Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Normal Subgroup of p-Group of Order ...
proofwiki-15608
Quaternion Group has Normal Subgroup without Complement
Let $Q$ denote the quaternion group. There exists a normal subgroup of $Q$ which has no complement.
From Subgroups of Quaternion Group: {{:Subgroups of Quaternion Group}} From Quaternion Group is Hamiltonian, all these subgroups are normal. For two subgroups to be complementary, they need to have an intersection which is trivial. However, apart from $\set e$ itself, all these subgroups contain $a^2$. Hence none of th...
Let $Q$ denote the [[Definition:Quaternion Group|quaternion group]]. There exists a [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $Q$ which has no [[Definition:Complement of Subgroup|complement]].
From [[Subgroups of Quaternion Group]]: {{:Subgroups of Quaternion Group}} From [[Quaternion Group is Hamiltonian]], all these [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroups]] are [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal]]. For two [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroups]] to be [[Definition:Complement of Subgroup|complementary]], they need t...
Quaternion Group has Normal Subgroup without Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Group_has_Normal_Subgroup_without_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quaternion_Group_has_Normal_Subgroup_without_Complement
[ "Subgroup Complements", "Quaternion Group" ]
[ "Definition:Dicyclic Group/Quaternion Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Complement of Subgroup" ]
[ "Quaternion Group/Subgroups", "Quaternion Group is Hamiltonian", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Complement of Subgroup", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Trivial Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definitio...
proofwiki-15609
Non-Abelian Order 2p Group has Order p Element
Let $p$ be an odd prime. Let $G$ be a non-abelian group of order $2 p$. Then $G$ has at least one element of order $p$.
By Lagrange's Theorem, all the elements of $G$ have orders $1$, $2$, $p$ or $2p$. From Identity is Only Group Element of Order 1, $2 p - 1$ elements of $G$ have orders greater than $1$. From Cyclic Group is Abelian, $G$ is not the cyclic group $2 p$. If $g \in G$ was of order $2 p$ then $g$ would generate the cyclic gr...
Let $p$ be an [[Definition:Odd Prime|odd prime]]. Let $G$ be a non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian group]] of [[Definition:Order of Structure|order $2 p$]]. Then $G$ has at least one [[Definition:Element|element]] of [[Definition:Order of Group Element|order $p$]].
By [[Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)|Lagrange's Theorem]], all the [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $G$ have [[Definition:Order of Group Element|orders]] $1$, $2$, $p$ or $2p$. From [[Identity is Only Group Element of Order 1]], $2 p - 1$ [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $G$ have [[Definition:Order of Group Elem...
Non-Abelian Order 2p Group has Order p Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Order_2p_Group_has_Order_p_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Order_2p_Group_has_Order_p_Element
[ "Order of Group Elements", "Groups of Order 2 p" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Prime", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Order of Group Element" ]
[ "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Identity is Only Group Element of Order 1", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Cyclic Group is Abelian", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Defini...
proofwiki-15610
Fourth Power Modulo 5
Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer. Then: :$n^4 \equiv m \pmod 5$ where $m \in \set {0, 1}$.
By Congruence of Powers: :$a \equiv b \pmod 5 \iff a^4 \equiv b^4 \pmod 5$ so it is sufficient to demonstrate the result for $n \in \set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}$. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0^4 | m = 0 | mo= \equiv | r = 0 | rr= \pmod 5 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1^4 | m = 1 | mo= \equ...
Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. Then: :$n^4 \equiv m \pmod 5$ where $m \in \set {0, 1}$.
By [[Congruence of Powers]]: :$a \equiv b \pmod 5 \iff a^4 \equiv b^4 \pmod 5$ so it is sufficient to demonstrate the result for $n \in \set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}$. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0^4 | m = 0 | mo= \equiv | r = 0 | rr= \pmod 5 | c = }} {{eqn | l = 1^4 | m = 1 | ...
Fourth Power Modulo 5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourth_Power_Modulo_5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourth_Power_Modulo_5
[ "Fourth Powers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Congruence of Powers", "Category:Fourth Powers" ]
proofwiki-15611
Subgroup of Order p in Group of Order 2p is Normal/Corollary
Let $G$ be non-abelian. Every element of $G \setminus K$ is of order $2$, and: :$\forall b \in G \setminus K: b a b^{-1} = a^{-1}$
By Lagrange's Theorem, the elements of $G \setminus K$ can be of order $1$, $2$, $p$ or $2 p$. $1$ is not possible because Identity is Only Group Element of Order 1. Then we have that $G$ is non-abelian. Hence from Cyclic Group is Abelian, $G$ is not cyclic. Thus $\order b \ne 2 p$. It remains to investigate $2$ and $p...
Let $G$ be non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]]. Every [[Definition:Element|element]] of $G \setminus K$ is of [[Definition:Order of Group Element|order]] $2$, and: :$\forall b \in G \setminus K: b a b^{-1} = a^{-1}$
By [[Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)|Lagrange's Theorem]], the [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $G \setminus K$ can be of [[Definition:Order of Group Element|order]] $1$, $2$, $p$ or $2 p$. $1$ is not possible because [[Identity is Only Group Element of Order 1]]. Then we have that $G$ is non-[[Definition:Abelia...
Subgroup of Order p in Group of Order 2p is Normal/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Order_p_in_Group_of_Order_2p_is_Normal/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Order_p_in_Group_of_Order_2p_is_Normal/Corollary
[ "Groups of Order 2 p" ]
[ "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Order of Group Element" ]
[ "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Identity is Only Group Element of Order 1", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Cyclic Group is Abelian", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Subgroup of Index 2 contains all Squares of Group Elements", "Definition:Ord...
proofwiki-15612
Subgroup of Order p in Group of Order 2p is Normal
Let $p$ be an odd prime. Let $G$ be a group of order $2 p$. Let $a \in G$ be of order $p$. Let $K = \gen a$ be the subgroup of $G$ generated by $a$. Then $K$ is normal in $G$.
The result Non-Abelian Order 2p Group has Order p Element demonstrates that such an element $a$ exists in $G$. By definition of generator of cyclic group, $K$ is the cyclic group $C_p$ of order $p$. By Lagrange's Theorem, the index of $K$ is: :$\index G K = \dfrac {\order G} {\order K} = \dfrac {2 p} p = 2$ The result ...
Let $p$ be an [[Definition:Odd Prime|odd prime]]. Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] of [[Definition:Order of Structure|order $2 p$]]. Let $a \in G$ be of [[Definition:Order of Group Element|order]] $p$. Let $K = \gen a$ be the [[Definition:Generated Subgroup|subgroup of $G$ generated]] by $a$. Then $K$ is [[...
The result [[Non-Abelian Order 2p Group has Order p Element]] demonstrates that such an [[Definition:Element|element]] $a$ exists in $G$. By definition of [[Definition:Generator of Cyclic Group|generator of cyclic group]], $K$ is the [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]] $C_p$ of [[Definition:Order of Group Element...
Subgroup of Order p in Group of Order 2p is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Order_p_in_Group_of_Order_2p_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Order_p_in_Group_of_Order_2p_is_Normal
[ "Groups of Order 2 p" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Prime", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Definition:Generated Subgroup", "Definition:Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Non-Abelian Order 2p Group has Order p Element", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Cyclic Group/Generator", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Order of Group Element", "Lagrange's Theorem (Group Theory)", "Definition:Index of Subgroup", "Subgroup of Index 2 is Normal" ]
proofwiki-15613
Inner Automorphisms form Subgroup of Automorphism Group
Let $G$ be a group. Then the set $\Inn G$ of all inner automorphisms of $G$ forms a normal subgroup of the automorphism group $\Aut G$ of $G$: :$\Inn G \le \Aut G$
Let $G$ be a group whose identity is $e$. Let $\kappa_x: G \to G$ be the inner automorphism defined as: :$\forall g \in G: \map {\kappa_x} g = x g x^{-1}$ We see that: :$\Inn G \ne \O$ as $\kappa_x$ is defined for all $x \in G$. We show that: :$\kappa_x, \kappa_y \in \Inn G: \kappa_x \circ \paren {\kappa_y}^{-1} \in \I...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then the [[Definition:Set|set]] $\Inn G$ of all [[Definition:Inner Automorphism|inner automorphisms]] of $G$ forms a [[Definition:Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of the [[Definition:Automorphism Group of Group|automorphism group]] $\Aut G$ of $G$: :$\Inn G \le \Aut G$
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] is $e$. Let $\kappa_x: G \to G$ be the [[Definition:Inner Automorphism|inner automorphism]] defined as: :$\forall g \in G: \map {\kappa_x} g = x g x^{-1}$ We see that: :$\Inn G \ne \O$ as $\kappa_x$ is defined for all $x \in G$. ...
Inner Automorphisms form Subgroup of Automorphism Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inner_Automorphisms_form_Subgroup_of_Automorphism_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inner_Automorphisms_form_Subgroup_of_Automorphism_Group
[ "Automorphism Groups", "Inner Automorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Inner Automorphism", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Automorphism Group/Group" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Inner Automorphism", "Inverse of Inner Automorphism", "Inverse of Product", "One-Step Subgroup Test" ]
proofwiki-15614
Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only
Let $G$ be a finite group whose identity is $e$. Let $\phi: G \to G$ be a group automorphism. Let $\phi$ have the property that: :$\forall g \in G \setminus \set e: \map \phi t \ne t$ That is, the only fixed element of $\phi$ is $e$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in G: x^{-1} \, \map \phi x = y^{-1} \, \map \phi y \implies x =...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{-1} \, \map \phi x | r = y^{-1} \, \map \phi y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map \phi x | r = x y^{-1} \, \map \phi y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map \phi x \paren {\map \phi y}^{-1} | r = x y^{-1} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \lead...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Finite Group|finite group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] is $e$. Let $\phi: G \to G$ be a [[Definition:Group Automorphism|group automorphism]]. Let $\phi$ have the property that: :$\forall g \in G \setminus \set e: \map \phi t \ne t$ That is, the only [[Definition:Fixed El...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^{-1} \, \map \phi x | r = y^{-1} \, \map \phi y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map \phi x | r = x y^{-1} \, \map \phi y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map \phi x \paren {\map \phi y}^{-1} | r = x y^{-1} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \lead...
Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Property_of_Group_Automorphism_which_Fixes_Identity_Only
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Property_of_Group_Automorphism_which_Fixes_Identity_Only
[ "Group Automorphisms", "Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Group Automorphism", "Definition:Fixed Element" ]
[]
proofwiki-15615
Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only/Corollary 1
:$\forall x \in G: \exists g \in G: x = g^{-1} \, \map \phi g$
Let $\psi: G \to G$ be the mapping: :$\forall x \in G: \map \psi x = x^{-1} \, \map \phi x$ From Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only: :$\forall x, y \in G: x^{-1} \, \map \phi x = y^{-1} \, \map \phi y \implies x = y$ That is, $\psi$ is an injection. From Injection from Finite Set to Itself is Surj...
:$\forall x \in G: \exists g \in G: x = g^{-1} \, \map \phi g$
Let $\psi: G \to G$ be the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]: :$\forall x \in G: \map \psi x = x^{-1} \, \map \phi x$ From [[Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only]]: :$\forall x, y \in G: x^{-1} \, \map \phi x = y^{-1} \, \map \phi y \implies x = y$ That is, $\psi$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injecti...
Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only/Corollary 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Property_of_Group_Automorphism_which_Fixes_Identity_Only/Corollary_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Property_of_Group_Automorphism_which_Fixes_Identity_Only/Corollary_1
[ "Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Property of Group Automorphism which Fixes Identity Only", "Definition:Injection", "Injection from Finite Set to Itself is Surjection", "Definition:Surjection" ]
proofwiki-15616
Automorphism Group of Cyclic Group is Abelian
Let $G$ be a cyclic group. Let $\Aut G$ denote the automorphism group of $G$. Then $\Aut G$ is abelian.
Let $G = \gen g$ Let $\phi, \psi \in \Aut G$. As $G$ is cyclic: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \exists a \in \Z | l = \map \phi g | r = g^a }} {{eqn | q = \exists b \in \Z | l = \map \psi g | r = g^b }} {{end-eqn}} Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\phi \circ \psi} g | r = \paren {g^a}^b ...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]]. Let $\Aut G$ denote the [[Definition:Automorphism Group|automorphism group]] of $G$. Then $\Aut G$ is [[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]].
Let $G = \gen g$ Let $\phi, \psi \in \Aut G$. As $G$ is [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \exists a \in \Z | l = \map \phi g | r = g^a }} {{eqn | q = \exists b \in \Z | l = \map \psi g | r = g^b }} {{end-eqn}} Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\phi \circ \p...
Automorphism Group of Cyclic Group is Abelian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Automorphism_Group_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Abelian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Automorphism_Group_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Abelian
[ "Cyclic Groups", "Automorphism Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Automorphism Group", "Definition:Abelian Group" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Cyclic Group/Generator", "Definition:Group Automorphism" ]
proofwiki-15617
Order of Automorphism Group of Prime Group
Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $G$ be a group of order $p$. Let $\Aut G$ denote the automorphism group of $G$. Then: :$\order {\Aut G} = p - 1$ where $\order {\, \cdot \,}$ denotes the order of a group.
From Prime Group is Cyclic we have that $G$ is a cyclic group. From Order of Automorphism Group of Cyclic Group: :$\order {\Aut G} = \map \phi p$ where $\map \phi n$ denotes the Euler $\phi$ function. The result follows from Euler Phi Function of Prime. {{qed}}
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] of [[Definition:Order of Group|order]] $p$. Let $\Aut G$ denote the [[Definition:Automorphism Group|automorphism group]] of $G$. Then: :$\order {\Aut G} = p - 1$ where $\order {\, \cdot \,}$ denotes the [[Definition:Order...
From [[Prime Group is Cyclic]] we have that $G$ is a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]]. From [[Order of Automorphism Group of Cyclic Group]]: :$\order {\Aut G} = \map \phi p$ where $\map \phi n$ denotes the [[Definition:Euler Phi Function|Euler $\phi$ function]]. The result follows from [[Euler Phi Function of...
Order of Automorphism Group of Prime Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_of_Automorphism_Group_of_Prime_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Order_of_Automorphism_Group_of_Prime_Group
[ "Prime Groups", "Automorphism Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Automorphism Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Group" ]
[ "Prime Group is Cyclic", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Order of Automorphism Group of Cyclic Group", "Definition:Euler Phi Function", "Euler Phi Function of Prime" ]
proofwiki-15618
Square Order 2 Matrices over Real Numbers form Ring with Unity
Let $S$ denote the set of square matrices of order $2$ whose entries are the set of real numbers. Then $S$ forms a non-commutative '''ring with unity''' whose unity is the matrix $\begin {pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end {pmatrix}$.
This is an instance of Ring of Square Matrices over Field is Ring with Unity. {{qed}}
Let $S$ denote the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrices]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order $2$]] whose [[Definition:Matrix Entry|entries]] are the [[Definition:Real Number|set of real numbers]]. Then $S$ forms a [[Definition:Non-Commutative Ring|non-commutative]] '''[[Defini...
This is an instance of [[Ring of Square Matrices over Field is Ring with Unity]]. {{qed}}
Square Order 2 Matrices over Real Numbers form Ring with Unity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Order_2_Matrices_over_Real_Numbers_form_Ring_with_Unity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Square_Order_2_Matrices_over_Real_Numbers_form_Ring_with_Unity
[ "Examples of Rings with Unity" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Non-Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Unity", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix" ]
[ "Ring of Square Matrices over Field is Ring with Unity" ]
proofwiki-15619
Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals
Let $\Q_{\ne 0}$ be the set of non-zero rational numbers. Let $\Bbb P$ denote the set of prime numbers. Let $a \in \Q_{\ne 0}$. Then the following infinite product converges: :$\size a \times \ds \prod_{p \mathop \in \Bbb P}^{} \norm a_p = 1$ where: :$\size {\,\cdot\,}$ is the absolute value on $\Q$ :$\norm {\,\cdot\,...
=== Lemma === {{:Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $a = \dfrac b c$, where $b, c \in \Z_{\ne 0}$. From the Lemma, the following infinite products converge: :$\size b \ds \times \prod_{p \mathop \in \Bbb P} \norm b_p = 1$ :$\size c \ds \times \prod_{p \mathop \in \Bbb P} \norm c_p ...
Let $\Q_{\ne 0}$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of non-zero [[Definition:Rational Numbers|rational numbers]]. Let $\Bbb P$ denote the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Prime Number|prime numbers]]. Let $a \in \Q_{\ne 0}$. Then the following [[Definition:Infinite Product|infinite product]] [[Definition:Converge...
=== [[Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals/Lemma|Lemma]] === {{:Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $a = \dfrac b c$, where $b, c \in \Z_{\ne 0}$. From the [[Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals/Lemma|Lemma]], the following [[Definition:Infinite Product|infi...
Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Formula_for_Norms_on_Non-zero_Rationals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Formula_for_Norms_on_Non-zero_Rationals
[ "P-adic Number Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Continued Product/Infinite", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Real Numbers", "Definition:Absolute Value", "Definition:P-adic Norm", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals/Lemma", "Product Formula for Norms on Non-zero Rationals/Lemma", "Definition:Continued Product/Infinite", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Real Numbers", "Combination Theorem for Sequences/Real/Quotient Rule", "Definition:Continued Product/Infinite", "Defi...
proofwiki-15620
Ring is Subring of Itself
Let $R$ be a ring. Then $R$ is a subring of itself.
$R$ is a ring and $R \subseteq R$. It follows by definition that $R$ is a subring of $R$. {{qed}}
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Then $R$ is a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of itself.
$R$ is a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]] and $R \subseteq R$. It follows by definition that $R$ is a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$. {{qed}}
Ring is Subring of Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ring_is_Subring_of_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ring_is_Subring_of_Itself
[ "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subring" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subring" ]
proofwiki-15621
Null Ring is Subring of Ring
Let $R$ be a ring. Then the null ring is a subring of $R$.
From Null Ring is Ring, the null ring $\struct {\set {0_R}, +, \circ}$ is a ring. We also have that $\set {0_R}$ is a subset of $R$ Hence the result by definition of subring. {{qed}}
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Then the [[Definition:Null Ring|null ring]] is a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$.
From [[Null Ring is Ring]], the [[Definition:Null Ring|null ring]] $\struct {\set {0_R}, +, \circ}$ is a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. We also have that $\set {0_R}$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $R$ Hence the result by definition of [[Definition:Subring|subring]]. {{qed}}
Null Ring is Subring of Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Null_Ring_is_Subring_of_Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Null_Ring_is_Subring_of_Ring
[ "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Null Ring", "Definition:Subring" ]
[ "Null Ring is Ring", "Definition:Null Ring", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Subring" ]
proofwiki-15622
Integers form Subring of Reals
The ring of integers $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ forms a subring of the field of real numbers.
We have that the set of integers $\Z$ are a subset of the real numbers $\R$. The field of real numbers is, a fortiori, also a ring. Hence the result, by definition of subring. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Ring of Integers|ring of integers]] $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ forms a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of the [[Definition:Field of Real Numbers|field of real numbers]].
We have that the [[Definition:Integer|set of integers]] $\Z$ are a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the [[Definition:Real Numbers|real numbers]] $\R$. The [[Definition:Field of Real Numbers|field of real numbers]] is, [[Definition:A Fortiori|a fortiori]], also a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Hence the r...
Integers form Subring of Reals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_form_Subring_of_Reals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_form_Subring_of_Reals
[ "Integers", "Real Numbers", "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring of Integers", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Field of Real Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Field of Real Numbers", "Definition:A Fortiori", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subring" ]
proofwiki-15623
Unity of Subring is not necessarily Unity of Ring
Let $\struct {S, +, \circ}$ be a ring with unity whose unity is $1_S$. Let $\struct {T, + \circ}$ be a subring of $\struct {S, + \circ}$ whose unity is $1_T$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $1_T = 1_S$.
Let $\struct {S, + \times}$ be the ring formed by the set of order $2$ square matrices over the real numbers $R$ under (conventional) matrix addition and (conventional) matrix multiplication. Let $T$ be the subset of $S$ consisting of the matrices of the form $\begin{bmatrix} x & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$ for $x \in \R...
Let $\struct {S, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_S$. Let $\struct {T, + \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $\struct {S, + \circ}$ whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_T$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $1_T ...
Let $\struct {S, + \times}$ be the [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]] formed by the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order $2$]] [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrices]] over the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $R$ under [[Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition|(conventio...
Unity of Subring is not necessarily Unity of Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_of_Subring_is_not_necessarily_Unity_of_Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_of_Subring_is_not_necessarily_Unity_of_Ring
[ "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Matrix Entrywise Addition", "Definition:Matrix Product (Conventional)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", ...
proofwiki-15624
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field
The zero of $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is also $0$.
By definition, $\struct {F, +, \times}$ and $\struct {K, +, \times}$ are both rings. Thus $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a subring of $\struct {F, +, \times}$ The result follows from Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Field Zero|zero]] of $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is also $0$.
By definition, $\struct {F, +, \times}$ and $\struct {K, +, \times}$ are both [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|rings]]. Thus $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $\struct {F, +, \times}$ The result follows from [[Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring]]. {{qed}}
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field/Proof_1
[ "Subfields", "Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field" ]
[ "Definition:Field Zero" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subring", "Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring" ]
proofwiki-15625
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field
The zero of $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is also $0$.
By definition, $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a subset of $F$ which is a field. By definition of field, $\struct {K, +}$ and $\struct {F, +}$ are groups such that $K \subseteq F$. So, by definition, $\struct {K, +}$ is a subgroup of $\struct {F, +}$. By Identity of Subgroup, the identity of $\struct {F, +}$, which is $0$,...
The [[Definition:Field Zero|zero]] of $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is also $0$.
By definition, $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $F$ which is a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. By definition of [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]], $\struct {K, +}$ and $\struct {F, +}$ are [[Definition:Group|groups]] such that $K \subseteq F$. So, by definition,...
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field/Proof_2
[ "Subfields", "Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field" ]
[ "Definition:Field Zero" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Identity of Subgroup", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
proofwiki-15626
Unity of Subfield is Unity of Field
The unity of $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is also $1$.
By definition, $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a subset of $F$ which is a field. By definition of field, $\struct {K^*, \times}$ and $\struct {F^*, \times}$ are groups such that $K \subseteq F$. So $\struct {K^*, \times}$ is a subgroup of $\struct {F^*, \times}$. By Identity of Subgroup, the identity of $\struct {F^*, \tim...
The [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] of $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is also $1$.
By definition, $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $F$ which is a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. By definition of [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]], $\struct {K^*, \times}$ and $\struct {F^*, \times}$ are [[Definition:Group|groups]] such that $K \subseteq F$. So $...
Unity of Subfield is Unity of Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_of_Subfield_is_Unity_of_Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_of_Subfield_is_Unity_of_Field
[ "Subfields" ]
[ "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Identity of Subgroup", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
proofwiki-15627
Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring
The zero of $\struct {S, +, \times}$ is also $0$.
By definition, $\struct {S, +, \times}$ is a subset of $R$ which is a ring. By definition of ring, $\struct {S, +}$ and $\struct {R, +}$ are groups such that $S \subseteq R$. So, by definition, $\struct {S, +}$ is a subgroup of $\struct {R, +}$. By Identity of Subgroup, the identity of $\struct {S, +}$, which is $0$, i...
The [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] of $\struct {S, +, \times}$ is also $0$.
By definition, $\struct {S, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $R$ which is a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. By definition of [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]], $\struct {S, +}$ and $\struct {R, +}$ are [[Definition:Group|groups]] such that $S \subseteq R$. So, by definition, $\s...
Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subring_is_Zero_of_Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subring_is_Zero_of_Ring
[ "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring Zero" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Identity of Subgroup", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Category:Subrings" ]
proofwiki-15628
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field/Proof 1
Let $\struct {F, +, \times}$ be a field whose zero is $0$. Let $\struct {K, +, \times}$ be a subfield of $\struct {F, +, \times}$. {{:Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field}}
By definition, $\struct {F, +, \times}$ and $\struct {K, +, \times}$ are both rings. Thus $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a subring of $\struct {F, +, \times}$ The result follows from Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {F, +, \times}$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] whose [[Definition:Field Zero|zero]] is $0$. Let $\struct {K, +, \times}$ be a [[Definition:Subfield|subfield]] of $\struct {F, +, \times}$. {{:Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field}}
By definition, $\struct {F, +, \times}$ and $\struct {K, +, \times}$ are both [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|rings]]. Thus $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $\struct {F, +, \times}$ The result follows from [[Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring]]. {{qed}}
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field/Proof_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field/Proof_1
[ "Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Field Zero", "Definition:Subfield" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subring", "Zero of Subring is Zero of Ring" ]
proofwiki-15629
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field/Proof 2
Let $\struct {F, +, \times}$ be a field whose zero is $0$. Let $\struct {K, +, \times}$ be a subfield of $\struct {F, +, \times}$. {{:Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field}}
By definition, $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a subset of $F$ which is a field. By definition of field, $\struct {K, +}$ and $\struct {F, +}$ are groups such that $K \subseteq F$. So, by definition, $\struct {K, +}$ is a subgroup of $\struct {F, +}$. By Identity of Subgroup, the identity of $\struct {F, +}$, which is $0$,...
Let $\struct {F, +, \times}$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] whose [[Definition:Field Zero|zero]] is $0$. Let $\struct {K, +, \times}$ be a [[Definition:Subfield|subfield]] of $\struct {F, +, \times}$. {{:Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field}}
By definition, $\struct {K, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $F$ which is a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. By definition of [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]], $\struct {K, +}$ and $\struct {F, +}$ are [[Definition:Group|groups]] such that $K \subseteq F$. So, by definition,...
Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field/Proof_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Subfield_is_Zero_of_Field/Proof_2
[ "Zero of Subfield is Zero of Field" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Field Zero", "Definition:Subfield" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Identity of Subgroup", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
proofwiki-15630
P-adic Norm not Complete on Rational Numbers/Proof 1/Case 1
Let $\norm {\,\cdot\,}_p$ be the $p$-adic norm on the rationals $\Q$ for some prime $p > 3$. Then: :$\struct {\Q, \norm {\,\cdot\,}_p}$ is not a complete normed division ring. That is, there exists a Cauchy sequence in $\struct {\Q, \norm{\,\cdot\,}_p}$ which does not converge to a limit in $\Q$.
Let $p > 3$. Then there exists $a \in \Z: 1 < a < p-1$. Consider the sequence $\sequence {x_n} \subseteq \Q$ where $x_n = a^{p^n}$ for some $a \in \Z: 1 < a < p-1$. Let $n \in \N$. Then: :$\norm {a^{p^{n + 1} } - a^{p^n} }_p = \norm {a^{p^n} (a^{p^n \paren {p - 1} } - 1) }_p$ From {{Corollary|Euler's Theorem (Number Th...
Let $\norm {\,\cdot\,}_p$ be the [[Definition:P-adic Norm|$p$-adic norm]] on the [[Definition:Rational Numbers|rationals $\Q$]] for some [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]] $p > 3$. Then: :$\struct {\Q, \norm {\,\cdot\,}_p}$ is not a [[Definition:Complete Normed Division Ring|complete normed division ring]]. That i...
Let $p > 3$. Then there exists $a \in \Z: 1 < a < p-1$. Consider the [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] $\sequence {x_n} \subseteq \Q$ where $x_n = a^{p^n}$ for some $a \in \Z: 1 < a < p-1$. Let $n \in \N$. Then: :$\norm {a^{p^{n + 1} } - a^{p^n} }_p = \norm {a^{p^n} (a^{p^n \paren {p - 1} } - 1) }_p$ From {{Coroll...
P-adic Norm not Complete on Rational Numbers/Proof 1/Case 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/P-adic_Norm_not_Complete_on_Rational_Numbers/Proof_1/Case_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/P-adic_Norm_not_Complete_on_Rational_Numbers/Proof_1/Case_1
[ "P-adic Norm not Complete on Rational Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:P-adic Norm", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Complete Normed Division Ring", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Normed Division Ring", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Normed Division Ring", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Normed Division Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Characterisation of Cauchy Sequence in Non-Archimedean Norm", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence", "Modulus of Limit/Normed Division Ring", "Definition:Norm/Division Ring", "Limit of Subsequence equals Limit of Sequence", "Combination Theorem for Sequ...
proofwiki-15631
P-adic Norm not Complete on Rational Numbers/Proof 1/Case 2
Let $\norm {\,\cdot\,}_p$ be the $p$-adic norm on the rationals $\Q$ for $p = 2$ or $3$. Then: :$\struct {\Q, \norm {\,\cdot\,}_p}$ is not a complete normed division ring. That is, there exists a Cauchy sequence in $\struct {\Q, \norm{\,\cdot\,}_p}$ which does not converge to a limit in $\Q$.
{{WIP}}
Let $\norm {\,\cdot\,}_p$ be the [[Definition:P-adic Norm|$p$-adic norm]] on the [[Definition:Rational Numbers|rationals $\Q$]] for $p = 2$ or $3$. Then: :$\struct {\Q, \norm {\,\cdot\,}_p}$ is not a [[Definition:Complete Normed Division Ring|complete normed division ring]]. That is, there exists a [[Definition:C...
{{WIP}}
P-adic Norm not Complete on Rational Numbers/Proof 1/Case 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/P-adic_Norm_not_Complete_on_Rational_Numbers/Proof_1/Case_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/P-adic_Norm_not_Complete_on_Rational_Numbers/Proof_1/Case_2
[ "P-adic Norm not Complete on Rational Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:P-adic Norm", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Complete Normed Division Ring", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Normed Division Ring", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Normed Division Ring", "Definition:Limit of Sequence/Normed Division Ring" ]
[]
proofwiki-15632
Element in Integral Domain is Divisor iff Principal Ideal is Superset
:$x \divides y \iff \ideal y \subseteq \ideal x$
Let that $x \divides y$. Then by definition of divisor: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \divides y | o = \leadsto | r = \exists t \in D: y = t x | c = {{Defof|Divisor of Ring Element}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = y \in \ideal x | c = {{Defof|Principal Ideal of Ring}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto...
:$x \divides y \iff \ideal y \subseteq \ideal x$
Let that $x \divides y$. Then by definition of [[Definition:Divisor of Ring Element|divisor]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \divides y | o = \leadsto | r = \exists t \in D: y = t x | c = {{Defof|Divisor of Ring Element}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = y \in \ideal x | c = {{Defof|Principa...
Element in Integral Domain is Divisor iff Principal Ideal is Superset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_in_Integral_Domain_is_Divisor_iff_Principal_Ideal_is_Superset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_in_Integral_Domain_is_Divisor_iff_Principal_Ideal_is_Superset
[ "Integral Domains", "Principal Ideals of Rings", "Factorization" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Ring with Unity" ]
proofwiki-15633
Element in Integral Domain is Unit iff Principal Ideal is Whole Domain
:$x \in U_D \iff \ideal x = D$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = U_D | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists u \in U_D | l = u | o = \in | r = \ideal x | c = Ideal of Unit is Whole Ring }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \ideal x | r = D | c = Ideal of Unit is Whole Ring }} ...
:$x \in U_D \iff \ideal x = D$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = U_D | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists u \in U_D | l = u | o = \in | r = \ideal x | c = [[Ideal of Unit is Whole Ring]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \ideal x | r = D | c = [[Ideal of Unit is Whole Ri...
Element in Integral Domain is Unit iff Principal Ideal is Whole Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_in_Integral_Domain_is_Unit_iff_Principal_Ideal_is_Whole_Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_in_Integral_Domain_is_Unit_iff_Principal_Ideal_is_Whole_Domain
[ "Integral Domains", "Principal Ideals of Rings" ]
[]
[ "Ideal of Unit is Whole Ring", "Ideal of Unit is Whole Ring" ]
proofwiki-15634
Residue of Gamma Function
Let $\Gamma$ be the Definition:Gamma Function. Let $n$ be a non-negative integer. Then: :$\Res \Gamma {-n} = \dfrac {\paren {-1}^n} {n!}$
By Poles of Gamma Function, $\Gamma$ has simple poles at the non-positive integers, so $-n$ is a simple pole of $\Gamma$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \Res \Gamma {-n} | r = \lim_{z \mathop \to -n} \paren {z - \paren {-n} } \map \Gamma z | c = Residue at Simple Pole }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{z \mathop \to -n} \paren {...
Let $\Gamma$ be the [[Definition:Gamma Function]]. Let $n$ be a non-[[Definition:Negative Integer|negative integer]]. Then: :$\Res \Gamma {-n} = \dfrac {\paren {-1}^n} {n!}$
By [[Poles of Gamma Function]], $\Gamma$ has [[Definition:Simple Pole|simple poles]] at the non-positive integers, so $-n$ is a simple pole of $\Gamma$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \Res \Gamma {-n} | r = \lim_{z \mathop \to -n} \paren {z - \paren {-n} } \map \Gamma z | c = [[Residue at Simple Pole]] }} {{eqn |...
Residue of Gamma Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Residue_of_Gamma_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Residue_of_Gamma_Function
[ "Gamma Function" ]
[ "Definition:Gamma Function", "Definition:Negative/Integer" ]
[ "Poles of Gamma Function", "Definition:Order of Pole/Simple Pole", "Residue at Simple Pole", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Category:Gamma Function" ]
proofwiki-15635
Periodic Element is Multiple of Period
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real periodic function with period $P$. Let $L$ be a periodic element of $f$. Then $P \divides L$.
{{AimForCont}} that $P \nmid L$. Then by the Division Theorem we have $L = q P + r$ where $q \in \Z$ and $0 < r < P$. And so: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x + L} | r = \map f {x + \paren {q P + r} } }} {{eqn | r = \map f {\paren {x + r} + q P} }} {{eqn | r = \map f {x + r} | c = General Periodicity Pro...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Periodic Function|real periodic function]] with [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]] $P$. Let $L$ be a [[Definition:Periodic Element|periodic element]] of $f$. Then $P \divides L$.
{{AimForCont}} that $P \nmid L$. Then by the [[Division Theorem/Real Number Index|Division Theorem]] we have $L = q P + r$ where $q \in \Z$ and $0 < r < P$. And so: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x + L} | r = \map f {x + \paren {q P + r} } }} {{eqn | r = \map f {\paren {x + r} + q P} }} {{eqn | r = \map f {x...
Periodic Element is Multiple of Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Periodic_Element_is_Multiple_of_Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Periodic_Element_is_Multiple_of_Period
[ "Periodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Periodic Function/Real", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Definition:Periodic Function/Periodic Element" ]
[ "Division Theorem/Real Number Index", "General Periodicity Property", "Definition:Periodic Function/Periodic Element", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period", "Proof by Contradiction", "Category:Periodic Functions" ]
proofwiki-15636
Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain
{{TFAE|def = Associate in Integral Domain|view = associate|context = Integral Domain|contextview = integral domains}} Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an integral domain. Let $x, y \in D$.
=== $(1)$ is Equivalent to $(2)$ === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain/Definition 1 Equivalent to Definition 2}}
{{TFAE|def = Associate in Integral Domain|view = associate|context = Integral Domain|contextview = integral domains}} Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]]. Let $x, y \in D$.
=== [[Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain/Definition 1 Equivalent to Definition 2|$(1)$ is Equivalent to $(2)$]] === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain/Definition 1 Equivalent to Definition 2}}
Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Associate_in_Integral_Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Associate_in_Integral_Domain
[ "Integral Domains", "Associates", "Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Domain" ]
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain/Definition 1 Equivalent to Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-15637
Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a principal ideal domain. Let $a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n$ be non-zero elements of $D$. Then $a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n$ all have a greatest common divisor.
Let $0_D$ and $1_D$ be the zero and unity respectively of $D$. Let $J$ be the set of all linear combinations in $D$ of $\set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$. From Set of Linear Combinations of Finite Set of Elements of Principal Ideal Domain is Principal Ideal: :$J = \ideal x$ for some $x \in D$, where $\ideal x$ denotes the ...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Principal Ideal Domain|principal ideal domain]]. Let $a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n$ be non-[[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $D$. Then $a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n$ all have a [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Ring Elements|greatest common divisor...
Let $0_D$ and $1_D$ be the [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] and [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] respectively of $D$. Let $J$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Linear Combination|linear combinations]] in $D$ of $\set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$. From [[Set of Linear Combinations of Finite Set of Elements ...
Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Set_of_Elements_in_Principal_Ideal_Domain_has_GCD
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Set_of_Elements_in_Principal_Ideal_Domain_has_GCD
[ "Principal Ideal Domains", "GCD Domains", "Greatest Common Divisor" ]
[ "Definition:Principal Ideal Domain", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain" ]
[ "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Set of Linear Combinations of Finite Set of Elements of Principal Ideal Domain is Principal Ideal", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Generator of Ideal of Ring", "De...
proofwiki-15638
Set of Linear Combinations of Finite Set of Elements of Principal Ideal Domain is Principal Ideal
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a principal ideal domain. Let $a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n$ be non-zero elements of $D$. Let $J$ be the set of all linear combinations in $D$ of $\set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$ Then for some $x \in D$: :$J = \ideal x$ where $\ideal x$ denotes the principal ideal generated by $x$.
Let the unity of $D$ be $1_D$. By definition of principal ideal: :$\ds \ideal a = \set {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n r_i \circ a \circ s_i: n \in \N, r_i, s_i \in D}$ Let $x, y \in J$. By definition of linear combination: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n r_i \circ a_i | c = for some $n \in...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Principal Ideal Domain|principal ideal domain]]. Let $a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n$ be non-[[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $D$. Let $J$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Linear Combination|linear combinations]] in $D$ of $\set {a_...
Let the [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] of $D$ be $1_D$. By definition of [[Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring|principal ideal]]: :$\ds \ideal a = \set {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n r_i \circ a \circ s_i: n \in \N, r_i, s_i \in D}$ Let $x, y \in J$. By definition of [[Definition:Linear Combination|linear combination...
Set of Linear Combinations of Finite Set of Elements of Principal Ideal Domain is Principal Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Linear_Combinations_of_Finite_Set_of_Elements_of_Principal_Ideal_Domain_is_Principal_Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Linear_Combinations_of_Finite_Set_of_Elements_of_Principal_Ideal_Domain_is_Principal_Ideal
[ "Principal Ideal Domains" ]
[ "Definition:Principal Ideal Domain", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Generator of Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Product with Ring Negative/Corollary", "Product with Ring Negative/Corollary", "Product with Ring Negative", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Test for...
proofwiki-15639
Greatest Common Divisors in Principal Ideal Domain are Associates
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a principal ideal domain. Let $S = \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$ be a set of non-zero elements of $D$. Let $y_1$ and $y_2$ be greatest common divisors of $S$. Then $y_1$ and $y_2$ are associates.
From Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD we have that at least one such greatest common divisor exists. So, let $y_1$ and $y_2$ be greatest common divisors of $S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = y_1 | o = \divides | r = y_2 | c = as $y_2$ is a greatest common divisor }} {{eqn | l...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Principal Ideal Domain|principal ideal domain]]. Let $S = \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of non-[[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $D$. Let $y_1$ and $y_2$ be [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Ring Elements|g...
From [[Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD]] we have that at least one such [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Ring Elements|greatest common divisor]] exists. So, let $y_1$ and $y_2$ be [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Ring Elements|greatest common divisors]] of $S$. Then: {{begin-e...
Greatest Common Divisors in Principal Ideal Domain are Associates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Greatest_Common_Divisors_in_Principal_Ideal_Domain_are_Associates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Greatest_Common_Divisors_in_Principal_Ideal_Domain_are_Associates
[ "Principal Ideal Domains", "Greatest Common Divisor", "Associates" ]
[ "Definition:Principal Ideal Domain", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain", "Definition:Associate/Integral Domain" ]
[ "Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/...
proofwiki-15640
Bézout's Identity/Principal Ideal Domain
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a principal ideal domain. Let $S = \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$ be a set of non-zero elements of $D$. Let $y$ be a greatest common divisor of $S$. Then $y$ is expressible in the form: :$y = d_1 a_1 + d_2 a_2 + \dotsb + d_n a_n$ where $d_1, d_2, \dotsc, d_n \in D$.
From Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD we have that at least one such greatest common divisor exists. So, let $y$ be a greatest common divisor of $S$. Let $J$ be the set of all linear combinations in $D$ of $\set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$. From Set of Linear Combinations of Finite Set of Elements ...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Principal Ideal Domain|principal ideal domain]]. Let $S = \set {a_1, a_2, \dotsc, a_n}$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of non-[[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $D$. Let $y$ be a [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Ring Elements|greatest co...
From [[Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD]] we have that at least one such [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Ring Elements|greatest common divisor]] exists. So, let $y$ be a [[Definition:Greatest Common Divisor of Ring Elements|greatest common divisor]] of $S$. Let $J$ be the [[Definition...
Bézout's Identity/Principal Ideal Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bézout's_Identity/Principal_Ideal_Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bézout's_Identity/Principal_Ideal_Domain
[ "Principal Ideal Domains", "Bézout's Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Principal Ideal Domain", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain" ]
[ "Finite Set of Elements in Principal Ideal Domain has GCD", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain", "Definition:Greatest Common Divisor/Integral Domain", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Linear Combination", "Set of Linear Combinations of Finite Set of Elements of Principal Ideal Domain is Prin...
proofwiki-15641
Complete Factorizations of Proper Element in Principal Ideal Domain are Equivalent
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a principal ideal domain. Let $x \in D$ be a proper element of $D$. Let there be two complete factorizations of $x$: :$x = u_y \circ y_1 \circ y_2 \circ \cdots \circ y_m = F_1$ :$x = u_z \circ z_1 \circ z_2 \circ \cdots \circ z_n = F_2$ Then $F_1$ and $F_2$ are equivalent.
{{ProofWanted|Whitelaw leaves this unresolved at the end of $\S 62$ as an exercise for the student. I haven't read ahead that far, but it may be proved in the exercises. Will return to this later.}}#
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Principal Ideal Domain|principal ideal domain]]. Let $x \in D$ be a [[Definition:Proper Element of Ring|proper element]] of $D$. Let there be two [[Definition:Complete Factorization|complete factorizations]] of $x$: :$x = u_y \circ y_1 \circ y_2 \circ \cdots \circ y_m = F...
{{ProofWanted|Whitelaw leaves this unresolved at the end of $\S 62$ as an exercise for the student. I haven't read ahead that far, but it may be proved in the exercises. Will return to this later.}}#
Complete Factorizations of Proper Element in Principal Ideal Domain are Equivalent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_Factorizations_of_Proper_Element_in_Principal_Ideal_Domain_are_Equivalent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_Factorizations_of_Proper_Element_in_Principal_Ideal_Domain_are_Equivalent
[ "Factorization", "Principal Ideal Domains" ]
[ "Definition:Principal Ideal Domain", "Definition:Proper Element of Ring", "Definition:Complete Factorization", "Definition:Equivalent Factorizations" ]
[]
proofwiki-15642
Moment Generating Function of Poisson Distribution
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable with a Poisson distribution with parameter $\lambda$ for some $\lambda \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the moment generating function $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} t = e^{\lambda \paren {e^t - 1} }$
From the definition of the Poisson distribution, $X$ has probability mass function: :$\map \Pr {X = n} = \dfrac {\lambda^n e^{-\lambda} } {n!}$ From the definition of a moment generating function: :$\ds \map {M_X} t = \expect {e^{t X} } = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \map \Pr {X = n} e^{t n}$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with a [[Definition:Poisson Distribution|Poisson distribution with parameter $\lambda$]] for some $\lambda \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]] $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} ...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Poisson Distribution|Poisson distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Mass Function|probability mass function]]: :$\map \Pr {X = n} = \dfrac {\lambda^n e^{-\lambda} } {n!}$ From the definition of a [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]]: :...
Moment Generating Function of Poisson Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Poisson_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Poisson_Distribution
[ "Moment Generating Functions", "Poisson Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Poisson Distribution", "Definition:Moment Generating Function" ]
[ "Definition:Poisson Distribution", "Definition:Probability Mass Function", "Definition:Moment Generating Function", "Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function", "Exponential of Sum" ]
proofwiki-15643
Moment Generating Function of Binomial Distribution
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable with a binomial distribution with parameters $n$ and $p$ for some $n \in \N$ and $0 \le p \le 1$: :$X \sim \Binomial n p$ Then the moment generating function $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} t = \paren {1 - p + p e^t}^n$
From the definition of the Binomial distribution, $X$ has probability mass function: :$\map \Pr {X = k} = \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n - k}$ From the definition of a moment generating function: :$\ds \map {M_X} t = \expect {e^{t X} } = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \map \Pr {X = k} e^{t k}$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l =...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with a [[Definition:Binomial Distribution|binomial distribution with parameters $n$ and $p$]] for some $n \in \N$ and $0 \le p \le 1$: :$X \sim \Binomial n p$ Then the [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]] $M_...
From the definition of the [[Definition: Binomial Distribution|Binomial distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Mass Function|probability mass function]]: :$\map \Pr {X = k} = \dbinom n k p^k \paren {1 - p}^{n - k}$ From the definition of a [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]]...
Moment Generating Function of Binomial Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Binomial_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Binomial_Distribution
[ "Moment Generating Function of Binomial Distribution", "Moment Generating Functions", "Binomial Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Binomial Distribution", "Definition:Moment Generating Function" ]
[ "Definition: Binomial Distribution", "Definition:Probability Mass Function", "Definition:Moment Generating Function", "Binomial Theorem" ]
proofwiki-15644
Moment Generating Function of Exponential Distribution
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable with an exponential distribution with parameter $\beta$ for some $\beta \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the moment generating function $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} t = \dfrac 1 {1 - \beta t}$ for $t < \dfrac 1 \beta$, and is undefined otherwise.
From the definition of the exponential distribution, $X$ has probability density function: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 \beta e^{-\frac x \beta}$ From the definition of a moment generating function: :$\ds \map {M_X} t = \expect {e^{t X} } = \int_0^\infty e^{t x} \map {f_X} x \rd x$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {M...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]] with an [[Definition:Exponential Distribution|exponential distribution]] with parameter $\beta$ for some $\beta \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]] $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\m...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Exponential Distribution|exponential distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Density Function|probability density function]]: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 \beta e^{-\frac x \beta}$ From the definition of a [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function...
Moment Generating Function of Exponential Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Exponential_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Exponential_Distribution
[ "Moment Generating Function of Exponential Distribution", "Moment Generating Functions", "Exponential Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Exponential Distribution", "Definition:Moment Generating Function" ]
[ "Definition:Exponential Distribution", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Definition:Moment Generating Function", "Exponential of Sum", "Primitive of Exponential Function", "Exponential Tends to Zero and Infinity", "Exponential Tends to Zero and Infinity", "Exponential Tends to Zero and Infin...
proofwiki-15645
Moment Generating Function of Discrete Uniform Distribution
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable with a discrete uniform distribution with parameter $n$ for some $n \in \N$. Then the moment generating function $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} t = \dfrac {e^t \paren {1 - e^{n t} } } {n \paren {1 - e^t} }$
From the definition of the discrete uniform distribution, $X$ has probability mass function: :$\map \Pr {X = N} = \dfrac 1 n$ From the definition of a moment generating function: :$\ds \map {M_X} t = \expect {e^{t X} } = \sum_{N \mathop = 1}^n \map \Pr {X = N} e^{N t}$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {M_X} t | r =...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with a [[Definition:Discrete Uniform Distribution|discrete uniform distribution with parameter $n$]] for some $n \in \N$. Then the [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]] $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} ...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Discrete Uniform Distribution|discrete uniform distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Mass Function|probability mass function]]: :$\map \Pr {X = N} = \dfrac 1 n$ From the definition of a [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]]: :$\ds \map...
Moment Generating Function of Discrete Uniform Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Discrete_Uniform_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Discrete_Uniform_Distribution
[ "Moment Generating Functions", "Discrete Uniform Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Discrete", "Definition:Moment Generating Function" ]
[ "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Discrete", "Definition:Probability Mass Function", "Definition:Moment Generating Function", "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Category:Moment Generating Functions", "Category:Discrete Uniform Distribution" ]
proofwiki-15646
Maximal Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Field/Proof 1/Maximal Ideal implies Quotient Ring is Field
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a commutative ring with unity whose zero is $0_R$ and whose unity is $1_R$. Let $J$ be an ideal of $R$. Let $J$ be a maximal ideal. Then the quotient ring $R / J$ is a field.
Let $J$ be a maximal ideal. Because $J \subset R$, it follows from Quotient Ring of Commutative Ring is Commutative and Quotient Ring of Ring with Unity is Ring with Unity that $R / J$ is a commutative ring with unity. We now need to prove that every non-zero element of $\struct {R / J, +, \circ}$ has a product invers...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring|commutative ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_R$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_R$. Let $J$ be an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $R$. Let $J$ be a [[Definition:Maximal Ideal of Ring|maximal...
Let $J$ be a [[Definition:Maximal Ideal of Ring|maximal ideal]]. Because $J \subset R$, it follows from [[Quotient Ring of Commutative Ring is Commutative]] and [[Quotient Ring of Ring with Unity is Ring with Unity]] that $R / J$ is a [[Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring|commutative ring with unity]]. We now ne...
Maximal Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Field/Proof 1/Maximal Ideal implies Quotient Ring is Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Maximal_Ideal_iff_Quotient_Ring_is_Field/Proof_1/Maximal_Ideal_implies_Quotient_Ring_is_Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Maximal_Ideal_iff_Quotient_Ring_is_Field/Proof_1/Maximal_Ideal_implies_Quotient_Ring_is_Field
[ "Maximal Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Field" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Maximal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Quotient Ring", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)" ]
[ "Definition:Maximal Ideal of Ring", "Quotient Ring of Commutative Ring is Commutative", "Quotient Ring of Ring with Unity is Ring with Unity", "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Product Inverse", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Su...
proofwiki-15647
Maximal Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Field/Proof 1/Quotient Ring is Field implies Ideal is Maximal
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a commutative ring with unity whose zero is $0_R$ and whose unity is $1_R$. Let $J$ be an ideal of $R$. Let the quotient ring $R / J$ be a field. Then $J$ is a maximal ideal.
Let $R / J$ be a field. Let $K$ be a left ideal of $R$ such that $J \subsetneq K \subseteq R$. We have that $J$ is the zero of $R / J$. Let $x \in K \setminus J$. Because $x \notin J$ then $x + J \ne J$. Because $R / J$ is a field then $x + J \in R / J$ has a product inverse, say $s + J$. Hence: :$1_R + J = \paren {s +...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring|commutative ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_R$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_R$. Let $J$ be an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $R$. Let the [[Definition:Quotient Ring|quotient ring]] $R /...
Let $R / J$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $K$ be a [[Definition:Left Ideal of Ring|left ideal]] of $R$ such that $J \subsetneq K \subseteq R$. We have that $J$ is the [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] of $R / J$. Let $x \in K \setminus J$. Because $x \notin J$ then $x + J \ne J$. Because $R /...
Maximal Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Field/Proof 1/Quotient Ring is Field implies Ideal is Maximal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Maximal_Ideal_iff_Quotient_Ring_is_Field/Proof_1/Quotient_Ring_is_Field_implies_Ideal_is_Maximal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Maximal_Ideal_iff_Quotient_Ring_is_Field/Proof_1/Quotient_Ring_is_Field_implies_Ideal_is_Maximal
[ "Maximal Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Field" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Quotient Ring", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Maximal Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Ideal of Ring/Left Ideal", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Product Inverse", "Left Cosets are Equal iff Product with Inverse in Subgroup", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
proofwiki-15648
Ring of Polynomial Forms is not necessarily Isomorphic to Ring of Polynomial Functions
Let $D$ be an integral domain. Let $D \sqbrk X$ be the ring of polynomial forms in $X$ over $D$. Let $\map P D$ be the ring of polynomial functions over $D$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $D \sqbrk X$ is isomorphic with $\map P D$.
Proof by Counterexample: Consider the integral domain $\struct {\Z_2, +, \times}$. From Ring of Integers Modulo Prime is Integral Domain, it is seen that $\struct {\Z_2, +, \times}$ is indeed an integral domain. Consider the ring of polynomial forms $\Z_2 \sqbrk X$. This is an infinite ring, as it can be seen that $S \...
Let $D$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]]. Let $D \sqbrk X$ be the [[Definition:Ring of Polynomial Forms|ring of polynomial forms]] in $X$ over $D$. Let $\map P D$ be the [[Definition:Ring of Polynomial Functions|ring of polynomial functions]] over $D$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $D...
[[Proof by Counterexample]]: Consider the [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] $\struct {\Z_2, +, \times}$. From [[Ring of Integers Modulo Prime is Integral Domain]], it is seen that $\struct {\Z_2, +, \times}$ is indeed an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]]. Consider the [[Definition:Ring of P...
Ring of Polynomial Forms is not necessarily Isomorphic to Ring of Polynomial Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ring_of_Polynomial_Forms_is_not_necessarily_Isomorphic_to_Ring_of_Polynomial_Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ring_of_Polynomial_Forms_is_not_necessarily_Isomorphic_to_Ring_of_Polynomial_Functions
[ "Polynomial Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Ring of Polynomial Forms", "Definition:Ring of Polynomial Functions", "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/Ring Isomorphism" ]
[ "Proof by Counterexample", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Ring of Integers Modulo Prime is Integral Domain", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Ring of Polynomials in Ring Element", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Ring of Polynomial Functions", "De...
proofwiki-15649
Moment Generating Function of Bernoulli Distribution
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable with a Bernoulli distribution with parameter $p$ for some $0 \le p \le 1$. Then the moment generating function $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} t = q + p e^t$ where $q = 1 - p$.
From the definition of the Bernoulli distribution, $X$ has probability mass function: :<nowiki>$\map \Pr {X = n} = \begin{cases} q & : n = 0 \\ p & : n = 1 \\ 0 & : n \notin \set {0, 1} \\ \end{cases}$</nowiki> From the definition of a moment generating function: :$\ds \map {M_X} t = \expect {e^{t X} } = \sum_{n \matho...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with a [[Definition:Bernoulli Distribution|Bernoulli distribution with parameter $p$]] for some $0 \le p \le 1$. Then the [[Definition:Moment Generating Function|moment generating function]] $M_X$ of $X$ is given by: :$\map {M_X} t = q + ...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Bernoulli Distribution|Bernoulli distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Mass Function|probability mass function]]: :<nowiki>$\map \Pr {X = n} = \begin{cases} q & : n = 0 \\ p & : n = 1 \\ 0 & : n \notin \set {0, 1} \\ \end{cases}$</nowiki> From the definition of a [[D...
Moment Generating Function of Bernoulli Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Bernoulli_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_Generating_Function_of_Bernoulli_Distribution
[ "Moment Generating Functions", "Bernoulli Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Moment Generating Function" ]
[ "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Probability Mass Function", "Definition:Moment Generating Function", "Exponential of Zero", "Category:Moment Generating Functions", "Category:Bernoulli Distribution" ]
proofwiki-15650
Field of Quotients of Ring of Polynomial Forms on Reals that yields Complex Numbers
Let $\struct {\R, +, \times}$ denote the field of real numbers. Let $X$ be transcendental over $\R$. Let $\R \sqbrk X$ be the ring of polynomials in $X$ over $F$. Consider the field of quotients: :$\R \sqbrk X / \ideal p$ where: :$p = X^2 + 1$ :$\ideal p$ denotes the ideal generated by $p$. Then $\R \sqbrk X / \ideal p...
It is taken as read that $X^2 + 1$ is irreducible in $\R \sqbrk X$. Hence by Polynomial Forms over Field form Principal Ideal Domain: Corollary 1, $\R \sqbrk X / \ideal p$ is indeed a field. Let $\nu$ be the quotient epimorphism from $\R \sqbrk X$ onto $\R \sqbrk X / \ideal p$. From Quotient Ring Epimorphism is Epimorp...
Let $\struct {\R, +, \times}$ denote the [[Definition:Field of Real Numbers|field of real numbers]]. Let $X$ be [[Definition:Transcendental over Field|transcendental over $\R$]]. Let $\R \sqbrk X$ be the [[Definition:Ring of Polynomials|ring of polynomials]] in $X$ over $F$. Consider the [[Definition:Field of Quotie...
It is taken as read that $X^2 + 1$ is [[Definition:Irreducible Element of Ring|irreducible]] in $\R \sqbrk X$. Hence by [[Polynomial Forms over Field form Principal Ideal Domain/Corollary 1|Polynomial Forms over Field form Principal Ideal Domain: Corollary 1]], $\R \sqbrk X / \ideal p$ is indeed a [[Definition:Field (...
Field of Quotients of Ring of Polynomial Forms on Reals that yields Complex Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_of_Quotients_of_Ring_of_Polynomial_Forms_on_Reals_that_yields_Complex_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_of_Quotients_of_Ring_of_Polynomial_Forms_on_Reals_that_yields_Complex_Numbers
[ "Polynomial Theory", "Fields of Quotients", "Real Numbers", "Complex Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Field of Real Numbers", "Definition:Transcendental (Abstract Algebra)/Field Extension/Element", "Definition:Polynomial Ring", "Definition:Field of Quotients", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Generator of Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Field of Complex Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Irreducible Element of Ring", "Polynomial Forms over Field form Principal Ideal Domain/Corollary 1", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Quotient Epimorphism/Ring", "Quotient Epimorphism is Epimorphism/Ring", "Definition:Ring Monomorphism", "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Al...
proofwiki-15651
Double of Antiperiodic Element is Periodic
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real function. Let $L \in \R_{>0}$ be an anti-periodic element of $f$. Then $2 L$ is a periodic element of $f$. In other words, every anti-periodic function is also periodic.
By Non-Zero Real Numbers Closed under Multiplication we have that $2 L \in \R_{>0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x + 2 L} | r = \map f {x + \paren {L + L} } }} {{eqn | r = \map f {\paren {x + L} + L} | c = Real Addition is Associative }} {{eqn | r = -\map f {x + L} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x ...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. Let $L \in \R_{>0}$ be an [[Definition:Antiperiodic Element|anti-periodic element]] of $f$. Then $2 L$ is a [[Definition:Periodic Element|periodic element]] of $f$. In other words, every [[Definition:Antiperiodic Function|anti-periodic function]] i...
By [[Non-Zero Real Numbers Closed under Multiplication]] we have that $2 L \in \R_{>0}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x + 2 L} | r = \map f {x + \paren {L + L} } }} {{eqn | r = \map f {\paren {x + L} + L} | c = [[Real Addition is Associative]] }} {{eqn | r = -\map f {x + L} }} {{eqn | r = \map ...
Double of Antiperiodic Element is Periodic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_of_Antiperiodic_Element_is_Periodic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_of_Antiperiodic_Element_is_Periodic
[ "Antiperiodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiodic Element", "Definition:Periodic Function/Periodic Element", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function", "Definition:Periodic Function/Real" ]
[ "Non-Zero Real Numbers Closed under Multiplication", "Real Addition is Associative", "Negative of Negative Real Number", "Category:Antiperiodic Functions" ]
proofwiki-15652
Idempotent Ring has Characteristic Two/Corollary
:$\forall x \in R: -x = x$
Let $0_R$ denote the zero of $R$. Let $x \in R$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x + x | r = 0_R | c = Idempotent Ring has Characteristic Two }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -x + x + x | r = -x + 0_R | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | r = -x | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Henc...
:$\forall x \in R: -x = x$
Let $0_R$ denote the [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] of $R$. Let $x \in R$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x + x | r = 0_R | c = [[Idempotent Ring has Characteristic Two]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -x + x + x | r = -x + 0_R | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | r = -x...
Idempotent Ring has Characteristic Two/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Idempotent_Ring_has_Characteristic_Two/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Idempotent_Ring_has_Characteristic_Two/Corollary
[ "Idempotent Rings" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Ring Zero", "Idempotent Ring has Characteristic Two" ]
proofwiki-15653
Skewness of Normal Distribution
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable with a normal distribution with parameters $\mu$ and $\sigma^2$ for some $\mu \in \R$ and $\sigma \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the skewness $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
From the definition of skewness: :$\gamma_1 = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3}$ From the definition of the normal distribution, $X$ has probability density function: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 {\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi} } \, \map \exp {-\dfrac { \paren {x - \mu}^2} {2 \sigma^2} }$ So, from Expectation of Function...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]] with a [[Definition:Normal Distribution|normal distribution with parameters $\mu$ and $\sigma^2$]] for some $\mu \in \R$ and $\sigma \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]] $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
From the definition of [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]]: :$\gamma_1 = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3}$ From the definition of the [[Definition:Normal Distribution|normal distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Density Function|probability density function]]: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 {\sigma \...
Skewness of Normal Distribution/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Normal_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Normal_Distribution/Proof_1
[ "Skewness of Normal Distribution", "Normal Distribution", "Skewness" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Normal Distribution", "Definition:Skewness" ]
[ "Definition:Skewness", "Definition:Normal Distribution", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Expectation of Function of Continuous Random Variable", "Integration by Substitution", "Definition:Odd Function", "Definite Integral of Odd Function" ]
proofwiki-15654
Skewness of Normal Distribution
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable with a normal distribution with parameters $\mu$ and $\sigma^2$ for some $\mu \in \R$ and $\sigma \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the skewness $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
From the definition of skewness, we have: :$\gamma_1 = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3}$ where: :$\mu$ is the expectation of $X$. :$\sigma$ is the standard deviation of $X$. By Expectation of Normal Distribution, we have: :$\mu = \mu$ By Variance of Normal Distribution, we have: :$\sigma = \sigma$ So:...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]] with a [[Definition:Normal Distribution|normal distribution with parameters $\mu$ and $\sigma^2$]] for some $\mu \in \R$ and $\sigma \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]] $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
From the definition of [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]], we have: :$\gamma_1 = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3}$ where: :$\mu$ is the [[Definition:Expectation|expectation]] of $X$. :$\sigma$ is the [[Definition:Standard Deviation|standard deviation]] of $X$. By [[Expectation of Normal Distribution]], ...
Skewness of Normal Distribution/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Normal_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Normal_Distribution/Proof_2
[ "Skewness of Normal Distribution", "Normal Distribution", "Skewness" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Normal Distribution", "Definition:Skewness" ]
[ "Definition:Skewness", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Standard Deviation", "Expectation of Normal Distribution", "Variance of Normal Distribution", "Binomial Theorem/Examples/Cube of Difference", "Expectation is Linear", "Variance of Normal Distribution", "Moment in terms of Moment Generating...
proofwiki-15655
Inverse of Unit in Centralizer of Ring is in Centralizer
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring. Let $S$ be a subset of $R$. Let $\map {C_R} S$ denote the centralizer of $S$ in $R$ Let $u \in R$ be a unit of $R$. Then: :$u \in \map {C_R} S \implies u^{-1} \in \map {C_R} S$
Let $u \in R$ be a unit of $R$. Let $u \in \map {C_R} S$. Then from Commutation with Inverse in Monoid: :$u^{-1} \in \map {C_R} S$ {{qed}}
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $R$. Let $\map {C_R} S$ denote the [[Definition:Centralizer of Ring Subset|centralizer]] of $S$ in $R$ Let $u \in R$ be a [[Definition:Unit of Ring|unit]] of $R$. Then: :$u \in \map {C_R} S \...
Let $u \in R$ be a [[Definition:Unit of Ring|unit]] of $R$. Let $u \in \map {C_R} S$. Then from [[Commutation with Inverse in Monoid]]: :$u^{-1} \in \map {C_R} S$ {{qed}}
Inverse of Unit in Centralizer of Ring is in Centralizer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Unit_in_Centralizer_of_Ring_is_in_Centralizer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Unit_in_Centralizer_of_Ring_is_in_Centralizer
[ "Ring Theory", "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Centralizer/Ring Subset", "Definition:Unit of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Unit of Ring", "Commutation with Inverse in Monoid" ]
proofwiki-15656
Inverse of Central Unit of Ring is in Center
Let $R$ be a ring. Let $\map Z R$ denote the center of $R$. Let $u \in R$ be a unit of $R$. Then: :$u \in \map Z R \implies u^{-1} \in \map Z R$
Follows directly from the definition of center and Inverse of Unit in Centralizer of Ring is in Centralizer. {{qed}}
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $\map Z R$ denote the [[Definition:Center of Ring|center]] of $R$. Let $u \in R$ be a [[Definition:Unit of Ring|unit]] of $R$. Then: :$u \in \map Z R \implies u^{-1} \in \map Z R$
Follows directly from the definition of [[Definition:Center of Ring|center]] and [[Inverse of Unit in Centralizer of Ring is in Centralizer]]. {{qed}}
Inverse of Central Unit of Ring is in Center
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Central_Unit_of_Ring_is_in_Center
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Central_Unit_of_Ring_is_in_Center
[ "Ring Theory", "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Unit of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Inverse of Unit in Centralizer of Ring is in Centralizer" ]
proofwiki-15657
Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments
Let $X$ be a random variable with mean $\mu$ and standard deviation $\sigma$. Then the skewness $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is given by: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \sigma^2 - \mu^3} {\sigma^3}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \gamma_1 | r = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3} | c = {{Defof|Skewness}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\expect {X^3 - 3 \mu X^2 + 3 \mu^2 X - \mu^3} } {\sigma^3} | c = Expectation is Linear, Cube of Difference }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \expect {X^2} + 3...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]] with [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] $\mu$ and [[Definition:Standard Deviation|standard deviation]] $\sigma$. Then the [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]] $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is given by: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \sigma^2 - \mu^3} {\sigma^3}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \gamma_1 | r = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3} | c = {{Defof|Skewness}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\expect {X^3 - 3 \mu X^2 + 3 \mu^2 X - \mu^3} } {\sigma^3} | c = [[Expectation is Linear]], [[Cube of Difference]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \expect {...
Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_in_terms_of_Non-Central_Moments
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_in_terms_of_Non-Central_Moments
[ "Skewness" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Standard Deviation", "Definition:Skewness" ]
[ "Expectation is Linear", "Binomial Theorem/Examples/Cube of Difference", "Expectation is Linear", "Variance as Expectation of Square minus Square of Expectation", "Category:Skewness" ]
proofwiki-15658
Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring Let $\mathbb L$ be a non-empty set of ideals of $R$. Then the intersection $\bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is itself an ideal of $R$.
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From Intersection of Subrings is Subring, we have that $L$ is a subring of $R$. Let $x \in L$ and $y \in R$. Then: :$\forall T \in \bigcap \mathbb L: x \circ y \in T, y \circ x \in T$ as every element of $\bigcap \mathbb L$, including $T$, is an ideal of $R$. If $y \in R$, then $x \circ y$ ...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]] Let $\mathbb L$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] of $R$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] $\bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is itself an [[Definition...
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From [[Intersection of Subrings is Subring]], we have that $L$ is a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$. Let $x \in L$ and $y \in R$. Then: :$\forall T \in \bigcap \mathbb L: x \circ y \in T, y \circ x \in T$ as every [[Definition:Element|element]] of $\bigcap \mathbb L$, including $T...
Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Ring_Ideals_is_Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Ring_Ideals_is_Ideal
[ "Set Intersection", "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Intersection of Subrings is Subring", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
proofwiki-15659
Set of Ring Elements forming Zero Product with given Element is Ideal
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a commutative ring whose zero is $0_R$. Let $a \in R$ be an arbitrary element of $R$. Let $A$ be the subset of $R$ defined as: :$A = \set {x \in R: x \circ a = 0_R}$ Then $A$ is an ideal of $A$.
By definition of ring zero: :$\forall x \in R: x \circ 0_R = 0_R$ Hence $0_R \in A$ and so $A \ne \O$. Let $a, b \in A$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in R | l = x \circ b | r = 0_R | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -\paren {x \circ b} | r = 0_R | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leads...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative ring]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_R$. Let $a \in R$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Element|element]] of $R$. Let $A$ be the [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $R$ defined as: :$A = \set {x \in R: x \circ a = 0_R}$ Then $A$ is an [...
By definition of [[Definition:Ring Zero|ring zero]]: :$\forall x \in R: x \circ 0_R = 0_R$ Hence $0_R \in A$ and so $A \ne \O$. Let $a, b \in A$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in R | l = x \circ b | r = 0_R | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -\paren {x \circ b} | r = 0_R ...
Set of Ring Elements forming Zero Product with given Element is Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Ring_Elements_forming_Zero_Product_with_given_Element_is_Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Ring_Elements_forming_Zero_Product_with_given_Element_is_Ideal
[ "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Test for Ideal" ]
proofwiki-15660
Skewness of Bernoulli Distribution
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable with a Bernoulli distribution with parameter $p$. Then the skewness $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is given by: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {1 - 2 p} {\sqrt {p q} }$ where $q = 1 - p$.
From Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \sigma^2 - \mu^3} {\sigma^3}$ where $\mu$ is the mean of $X$, and $\sigma$ the standard deviation. We have, by Expectation of Bernoulli Distribution: :$\mu = p$ By Variance of Bernoulli Distribution, we also have: :$\var X = \s...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with a [[Definition:Bernoulli Distribution|Bernoulli distribution with parameter $p$]]. Then the [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]] $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is given by: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {1 - 2 p} {\sqrt {p q} }$ where $q = 1 - p$.
From [[Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments]]: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \sigma^2 - \mu^3} {\sigma^3}$ where $\mu$ is the [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] of $X$, and $\sigma$ the [[Definition:Standard Deviation|standard deviation]]. We have, by [[Expectation of Bernoulli Distribution]]: :$\mu...
Skewness of Bernoulli Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Bernoulli_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Bernoulli_Distribution
[ "Bernoulli Distribution", "Skewness" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Skewness" ]
[ "Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Standard Deviation", "Expectation of Bernoulli Distribution", "Variance of Bernoulli Distribution", "Raw Moment of Bernoulli Distribution", "Difference of Two Squares", "Category:Bernoulli Distribution", "Category:Skew...
proofwiki-15661
Intersection of Subrings is Subring
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring. Let $\mathbb L$ be a non-empty set of subrings of $R$. Then the intersection $\bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is itself a subring of $R$.
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. By Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup, $\struct {L, +}$ is a subgroup of $\struct {R, +}$. By the One-Step Subgroup Test: :$\forall x, y \in \struct {L, +}: x + \paren {-y} \in L$ By Intersection of Subsemigroups, $\struct {L, \circ}$ a subsemigroup of $\struct {R, \circ}$. So by definit...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $\mathbb L$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Subring|subrings]] of $R$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] $\bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is itself a [[Definition:Sub...
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. By [[Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup]], $\struct {L, +}$ is a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $\struct {R, +}$. By the [[One-Step Subgroup Test]]: :$\forall x, y \in \struct {L, +}: x + \paren {-y} \in L$ By [[Intersection of Subsemigroups]], $\struct {L, \circ}$ a [[Definitio...
Intersection of Subrings is Subring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subrings_is_Subring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subrings_is_Subring
[ "Set Intersection", "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Subring" ]
[ "Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "One-Step Subgroup Test", "Intersection of Subsemigroups", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Subring Test", "Definition:Subring" ]
proofwiki-15662
Median of Exponential Distribution
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable of the exponential distribution with parameter $\beta$ for some $\beta \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the median of $X$ is equal to $\beta \ln 2$.
Let $M$ be the median of $X$. From the definition of the exponential distribution, $X$ has probability density function: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 \beta e^{-\frac x \beta}$ Note that $f_X$ is non-zero, so the median is unique. {{Explain|Why the above follows}} We have by the definition of a median: :$\ds \map \Pr {X ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]] of the [[Definition:Exponential Distribution|exponential distribution]] with parameter $\beta$ for some $\beta \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the [[Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable|median]] of $X$ is equal to $\beta \ln 2$.
Let $M$ be the [[Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable|median]] of $X$. From the definition of the [[Definition:Exponential Distribution|exponential distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Density Function|probability density function]]: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 \beta e^{-\frac x \beta}$ Note th...
Median of Exponential Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Median_of_Exponential_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Median_of_Exponential_Distribution
[ "Exponential Distribution", "Medians" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Exponential Distribution", "Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable" ]
[ "Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable", "Definition:Exponential Distribution", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable", "Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable", "Definition:Definite Integral", "Primitive of Exponential Function", ...
proofwiki-15663
Intersection of Ring Ideals is Largest Ideal Contained in all Ideals
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring Let $\mathbb L$ be a non-empty set of ideals of $R$. Then the intersection $\bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is the largest ideal of $R$ contained in each member of $\mathbb L$.
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal $L$ is indeed an ideal of $R$. Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From Intersection of Subrings is Largest Subring Contained in all Subrings, we have that $L$ is the largest subring of $R$ contained in each member of $\mathbb L$. As $L$ is the largest su...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]] Let $\mathbb L$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] of $R$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] $\bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is the largest [[Definiti...
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From [[Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal]] $L$ is indeed an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $R$. Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From [[Intersection of Subrings is Largest Subring Contained in all Subrings]], we have that $L$ is the largest [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$ c...
Intersection of Ring Ideals is Largest Ideal Contained in all Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Ring_Ideals_is_Largest_Ideal_Contained_in_all_Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Ring_Ideals_is_Largest_Ideal_Contained_in_all_Ideals
[ "Set Intersection", "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Intersection of Subrings is Largest Subring Contained in all Subrings", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
proofwiki-15664
Intersection of Subrings is Largest Subring Contained in all Subrings
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring. Let $\mathbb L$ be a non-empty set of subrings of $R$. Then the intersection $\ds \bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is the largest subring of $R$ contained in each member of $\mathbb L$.
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From Intersection of Subrings is Subring, $L$ is indeed a subring of $R$. By Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup, $\struct {L, +}$ is the largest subgroup of $\struct {R, +}$ contained in each member of $\mathbb L$. By Intersection of Subsemigroups, $\struct {L, \circ}$ is the largest...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $\mathbb L$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Subring|subrings]] of $R$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] $\ds \bigcap \mathbb L$ of the members of $\mathbb L$ is the largest [[Definit...
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb L$. From [[Intersection of Subrings is Subring]], $L$ is indeed a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$. By [[Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup]], $\struct {L, +}$ is the largest [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $\struct {R, +}$ contained in each member of $\mathbb L$. By [[Inter...
Intersection of Subrings is Largest Subring Contained in all Subrings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subrings_is_Largest_Subring_Contained_in_all_Subrings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subrings_is_Largest_Subring_Contained_in_all_Subrings
[ "Set Intersection", "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Subring" ]
[ "Intersection of Subrings is Subring", "Definition:Subring", "Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Intersection of Subsemigroups", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Subring", "Intersection is Largest Subset", "Definition:Subring" ]
proofwiki-15665
Median of Continuous Uniform Distribution
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable which is uniformly distributed on a closed real interval $\closedint a b$. Then the median $M$ of $X$ is given by: :$M = \dfrac {a + b} 2$
From the definition of the continuous uniform distribution, $X$ has probability density function: :$\map {f_X} x = \begin{cases} \dfrac 1 {b - a} & : a \leq x \leq b \\ 0 & : \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$ Note that $f_X$ is non-zero, so the median is unique. We have by the definition of a median: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]] which is [[Definition:Continuous Uniform Distribution|uniformly distributed]] on a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]] $\closedint a b$. Then the [[Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable|median]] $M$ of $X$...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Continuous Uniform Distribution|continuous uniform distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Density Function|probability density function]]: :$\map {f_X} x = \begin{cases} \dfrac 1 {b - a} & : a \leq x \leq b \\ 0 & : \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$ Note that $f_X$ is no...
Median of Continuous Uniform Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Median_of_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Median_of_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution
[ "Continuous Uniform Distribution", "Medians" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Continuous", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable" ]
[ "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Continuous", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Median of Continuous Random Variable", "Primitive of Constant", "Category:Continuous Uniform Distribution", "Category:Medians" ]
proofwiki-15666
Intersection of All Ring Ideals Containing Subset is Smallest
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring Let $S \subseteq R$ be a subset of $R$. Let $L$ be the intersection of the set of all ideals of $R$ containing $S$. Then $L$ is the smallest ideal of $R$ containing $S$.
From Intersection of All Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest, $L$ is the smallest subring of $R$ containing $S$. From Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal, $L$ is an ideal of $R$. As $L$ is the smallest subring of $R$ containing $S$, and it is an ideal of $R$, there can be no smaller ideal of $R$ containing $S$ as i...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]] Let $S \subseteq R$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $R$. Let $L$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] of $R$ containing $S$. Then $L$ is the small...
From [[Intersection of All Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest]], $L$ is the smallest [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$ containing $S$. From [[Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal]], $L$ is an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $R$. As $L$ is the smallest [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$ containing $S...
Intersection of All Ring Ideals Containing Subset is Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_All_Ring_Ideals_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_All_Ring_Ideals_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
[ "Set Intersection", "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Intersection of All Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest", "Definition:Subring", "Intersection of Ring Ideals is Ideal", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set...
proofwiki-15667
Intersection of All Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring. Let $S \subseteq R$ be a subset of $R$. Let $L$ be the intersection of the set of all subrings of $R$ containing $S$. Then $L$ is the smallest subring of $R$ containing $S$.
From Intersection of Subrings is Subring, $L$ is indeed a subring of $R$. Let $T$ be a subring of $R$ containing $S$. Let $x, y \in L$. By the Subring Test, we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x - y | o = \in | r = L }} {{eqn | l = x \circ y | o = \in | r = L }} {{end-eqn}} By Intersection i...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $S \subseteq R$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $R$. Let $L$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Subring|subrings]] of $R$ containing $S$. Then $L$ is the smallest...
From [[Intersection of Subrings is Subring]], $L$ is indeed a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$. Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$ containing $S$. Let $x, y \in L$. By the [[Subring Test]], we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x - y | o = \in | r = L }} {{eqn | l = x \circ y ...
Intersection of All Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_All_Subrings_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_All_Subrings_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
[ "Set Intersection", "Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Subring" ]
[ "Intersection of Subrings is Subring", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Subring", "Subring Test", "Intersection is Largest Subset", "Definition:Subring", "Subring Test", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-15668
Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a division ring. Let $\mathbb K$ be a non-empty set of division subrings of $D$. Then the intersection $\ds \bigcap \mathbb K$ of the members of $\mathbb K$ is itself a division subring of $D$.
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. Let $0$ be the zero of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$. By Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup: General Result, $\struct {L, +}$ is a subgroup of $\struct {D, +}$. By the One-Step Subgroup Test: :$\forall x, y \in L: x + \paren {-y} \in L$ By Non-Zero Elements of Division Ring form Group: :$\...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. Let $\mathbb K$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Division Subring|division subrings]] of $D$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] $\ds \bigcap \mathbb K$ of the members of $\mathbb K$ is itse...
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. Let $0$ be the [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$. By [[Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup/General Result|Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup: General Result]], $\struct {L, +}$ is a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $\struct {D, +}$. By the [[One-Step S...
Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Division_Subrings_is_Division_Subring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Division_Subrings_is_Division_Subring
[ "Division Subrings", "Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Division Subring" ]
[ "Definition:Ring Zero", "Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup/General Result", "Definition:Subgroup", "One-Step Subgroup Test", "Non-Zero Elements of Division Ring form Group", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Group", "Set Difference over Subset", "Definition:Subgroup", "Set Difference is Right Di...
proofwiki-15669
Intersection of Subfields is Subfield
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a field. Let $\mathbb K$ be a non-empty set of subfields of $F$. Then the intersection $\ds \bigcap \mathbb K$ of the members of $\mathbb K$ is itself a subfield of $F$.
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. A field is by definition also a division ring. From Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring, $L$ is itself a division subring of $F$. As $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ is a field, $\circ$ is commutative on $F$. By Restriction of Commutative Operation is Commutative, it follows th...
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $\mathbb K$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Subfield|subfields]] of $F$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] $\ds \bigcap \mathbb K$ of the members of $\mathbb K$ is itself a [[Defini...
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. A [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] is by definition also a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. From [[Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring]], $L$ is itself a [[Definition:Division Subring|division subring]] of $F$. As $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ is ...
Intersection of Subfields is Subfield
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subfields_is_Subfield
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subfields_is_Subfield
[ "Set Intersection", "Subfields" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subfield", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Subfield" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Division Ring", "Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Restriction of Commutative Operation is Commutative", "Definition:Commu...
proofwiki-15670
Intersection of Division Subrings is Largest Division Subring Contained in all Division Subrings
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a division ring. Let $\mathbb K$ be a non-empty set of division subrings of $D$. Let $\ds \bigcap \mathbb K$ be the intersection of the elements of $\mathbb K$. Then $\ds \bigcap \mathbb K$ is the largest division subring of $D$ contained in each element of $\mathbb K$.
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. Let $0$ be the zero of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$. From Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring, $\struct {L, +, \circ}$ is a division subring of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$. By Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup, $\struct {L, +}$ is the largest subgroup of $\struct {D, +}$ co...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. Let $\mathbb K$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Division Subring|division subrings]] of $D$. Let $\ds \bigcap \mathbb K$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of the [[Definition:Element|elements...
Let $\ds L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. Let $0$ be the [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$. From [[Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring]], $\struct {L, +, \circ}$ is a [[Definition:Division Subring|division subring]] of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$. By [[Intersection of Subgroups is Subgro...
Intersection of Division Subrings is Largest Division Subring Contained in all Division Subrings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Division_Subrings_is_Largest_Division_Subring_Contained_in_all_Division_Subrings
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Division_Subrings_is_Largest_Division_Subring_Contained_in_all_Division_Subrings
[ "Division Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Element" ]
[ "Definition:Ring Zero", "Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring", "Definition:Division Subring", "Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Element", "Intersection of Subgroups is Subgroup", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Su...
proofwiki-15671
Intersection of Division Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a division ring. Let $S \subseteq D$ be a subset of $D$. Let $L$ be the intersection of the set of all division subrings of $D$ containing $S$. Then $L$ is the smallest division subring of $D$ containing $S$.
From Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring, $L$ is indeed a division subring of $D$. Let $T$ be a division subring of $D$ containing $S$. Let $x, y \in L$. By the Division Subring Test, we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x - y | o = \in | r = L }} {{eqn | l = x \circ y | o = \in ...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. Let $S \subseteq D$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $D$. Let $L$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Division Subring|division subrings]] of $D$ containing $S$. Then $L...
From [[Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring]], $L$ is indeed a [[Definition:Division Subring|division subring]] of $D$. Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Division Subring|division subring]] of $D$ containing $S$. Let $x, y \in L$. By the [[Division Subring Test]], we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x ...
Intersection of Division Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Division_Subrings_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Division_Subrings_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
[ "Division Subrings" ]
[ "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Division Subring" ]
[ "Intersection of Division Subrings is Division Subring", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Division Subring", "Division Subring Test", "Intersection is Largest Subset", "Definition:Division Subring", "Division Subring Test", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-15672
Intersection of Subfields Containing Subset is Smallest
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a field. Let $S \subseteq F$ be a subset of $F$. Let $L$ be the intersection of the set of all subfields of $F$ containing $S$. Then $L$ is the smallest subfield of $F$ containing $S$.
A field is by definition also a division subring. Thus $L$ is the intersection of the set of all division subrings of $F$ containing $S$. From Intersection of Division Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest, $L$ is the smallest division subring of $F$ containing $S$. From Intersection of Subfields is Subfield, $L$ is a...
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $S \subseteq F$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $F$. Let $L$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Subfield|subfields]] of $F$ containing $S$. Then $L$ is the smal...
A [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] is by definition also a [[Definition:Division Subring|division subring]]. Thus $L$ is the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Division Subring|division subrings]] of $F$ containing $S$. From [[Intersection of Di...
Intersection of Subfields Containing Subset is Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subfields_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subfields_Containing_Subset_is_Smallest
[ "Set Intersection", "Subfields" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subfield", "Definition:Subfield" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Division Subring", "Intersection of Division Subrings Containing Subset is Smallest", "Definition:Division Subring", "Intersection of Subfields is Subfield", "Definition...
proofwiki-15673
Intersection of Subfields is Largest Subfield Contained in all Subfields
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a field. Let $\mathbb K$ be a non-empty set of subfields of $F$. Let $\bigcap \mathbb K$ be the intersection of the elements of $\mathbb K$. Then $\bigcap \mathbb K$ is the largest subfield of $F$ contained in each element of $\mathbb K$.
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. From Intersection of Subfields is Subfield, $\struct {L, +, \circ}$ is itself a subfield of $\struct {F, +, \circ}$. A field is by definition also a division subring. Thus $\struct {L, +, \circ}$ is the largest division subring of $F$ contained in each element of $\mathbb K$. But as $\struc...
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $\mathbb K$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]] of [[Definition:Subfield|subfields]] of $F$. Let $\bigcap \mathbb K$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of the [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $\mathbb K$...
Let $L = \bigcap \mathbb K$. From [[Intersection of Subfields is Subfield]], $\struct {L, +, \circ}$ is itself a [[Definition:Subfield|subfield]] of $\struct {F, +, \circ}$. A [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] is by definition also a [[Definition:Division Subring|division subring]]. Thus $\struct {L, +, ...
Intersection of Subfields is Largest Subfield Contained in all Subfields
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subfields_is_Largest_Subfield_Contained_in_all_Subfields
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subfields_is_Largest_Subfield_Contained_in_all_Subfields
[ "Set Intersection", "Subfields" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subfield", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Subfield", "Definition:Element" ]
[ "Intersection of Subfields is Subfield", "Definition:Subfield", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Division Subring", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Restriction of Commutative Operation ...
proofwiki-15674
Equivalent Norms on Rational Numbers/Necessary Condition
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be norms on the rational numbers $\Q$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be equivalent norms. Then: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall n \in \N: \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha$
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be equivalent. By Norm is Power of Other Norm then: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall q \in \Q: \norm q_1 = \norm q_2^\alpha$ In particular: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall n \in \N: \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha$
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be [[Definition:Norm on Division Ring|norms]] on the [[Definition:Rational Numbers|rational numbers]] $\Q$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be [[Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms|equivalent norms]]. Then: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_...
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be [[Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms|equivalent]]. By [[Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms/Norm is Power of Other Norm|Norm is Power of Other Norm]] then: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall q \in \Q: \norm q_1 = \norm q_2^\alpha$ In partic...
Equivalent Norms on Rational Numbers/Necessary Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalent_Norms_on_Rational_Numbers/Necessary_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalent_Norms_on_Rational_Numbers/Necessary_Condition
[ "Normed Division Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Norm/Division Ring", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms", "Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms/Norm is Power of Other Norm" ]
proofwiki-15675
Equivalent Norms on Rational Numbers/Sufficient Condition
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be norms on the rational numbers $\Q$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ satisfy: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall n \in \N: \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha$ Then $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ are equivalent
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ satisfy: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall n \in \N: \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha$ By Norm of Negative then: :$\forall n \in \N: \norm {-n}_1 = \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha = \norm {-n}_2^\alpha$ Hence: :$\forall k \in \Z: \norm k_1 = \norm k_2^\alpha$ By N...
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ be [[Definition:Norm on Division Ring|norms]] on the [[Definition:Rational Numbers|rational numbers]] $\Q$. Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ satisfy: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall n \in \N: \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha$ Then $\...
Let $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_1$ and $\norm {\, \cdot \,}_2$ satisfy: :$\exists \alpha \in \R_{\gt 0}: \forall n \in \N: \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha$ By [[Properties of Norm on Division Ring/Norm of Negative|Norm of Negative]] then: :$\forall n \in \N: \norm {-n}_1 = \norm n_1 = \norm n_2^\alpha = \norm {-n}_2^\alpha$ H...
Equivalent Norms on Rational Numbers/Sufficient Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalent_Norms_on_Rational_Numbers/Sufficient_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalent_Norms_on_Rational_Numbers/Sufficient_Condition
[ "Normed Division Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Norm/Division Ring", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms" ]
[ "Properties of Norm on Division Ring/Norm of Negative", "Properties of Norm on Division Ring/Norm of Quotient", "Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms/Norm is Power of Other Norm", "Definition:Equivalent Division Ring Norms" ]
proofwiki-15676
Commutative and Unitary Ring with 2 Ideals is Field
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a commutative ring with unity whose zero is $0_R$. Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be such that the only ideals of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ are: :$\set {0_R}$ and: $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ itself. That is, such that $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ has no non-null proper ideals. Then $\struct {R, +, \ci...
From Null Ring is Ideal and Ring is Ideal of Itself, it is always the case that $\set {0_R}$ and $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ are ideals of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$. Let $a \in R^*$, where $R^* := R \setminus \set {0_R}$. Let $\ideal a$ be the principal ideal of $R$ generated by $a$. We have that $\ideal a$ is a non-null ide...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring|commutative ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_R$. Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be such that the only [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ are: :$\set {0_R}$ and: $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ itself....
From [[Null Ring is Ideal]] and [[Ring is Ideal of Itself]], it is always the case that $\set {0_R}$ and $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ are [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$. Let $a \in R^*$, where $R^* := R \setminus \set {0_R}$. Let $\ideal a$ be the [[Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring|princ...
Commutative and Unitary Ring with 2 Ideals is Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutative_and_Unitary_Ring_with_2_Ideals_is_Field
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutative_and_Unitary_Ring_with_2_Ideals_is_Field
[ "Commutative Algebra", "Field Theory", "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Null Ideal", "Definition:Ideal of Ring/Proper Ideal", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)" ]
[ "Null Ring is Ideal", "Ring is Ideal of Itself", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Non-Null Ideal", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Commutativ...
proofwiki-15677
Field has 2 Ideals
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a field whose zero is $0_F$ and whose unity is $1_F$. Then the only ideals of $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ are $\struct {F, +}$ and $\set {0_F}$. That is, $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ has no non-null proper ideals.
By definition, a field is a division ring. From Null Ring is Ideal and Ring is Ideal of Itself, it is always the case that $\set {0_F}$ and $\struct {F, +}$ are ideals of $\struct {F, +, \circ}$. From Ideals of Division Ring, it follows that the only ideals of $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ are $\struct {F, +}$ and $\set {0_F...
Let $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] whose [[Definition:Field Zero|zero]] is $0_F$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Field|unity]] is $1_F$. Then the only [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] of $\struct {F, +, \circ}$ are $\struct {F, +}$ and $\set {0_F}$. That is, $\struct {F...
By definition, a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] is a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. From [[Null Ring is Ideal]] and [[Ring is Ideal of Itself]], it is always the case that $\set {0_F}$ and $\struct {F, +}$ are [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] of $\struct {F, +, \circ}$. From [[Ideals of...
Field has 2 Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_has_2_Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_has_2_Ideals
[ "Commutative Algebra", "Field Theory", "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Field Zero", "Definition:Multiplicative Identity", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Null Ideal", "Definition:Ideal of Ring/Proper Ideal" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Division Ring", "Null Ring is Ideal", "Ring is Ideal of Itself", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Ideals of Division Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
proofwiki-15678
Non-Commutative Ring with Unity and 2 Ideals not necessarily Division Ring
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring with unity whose zero is $0_F$ and whose unity is $1_F$. Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ specifically not be commutative. Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be such that the only ideals of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ are $\set {0_R}$ and $R$ itself. Then it is not necessarily the case that $\stru...
Let $S$ be the set of square matrices of order $2$ over the real numbers $\R$. $S$ is not a division ring, as for example: :$\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$ and so both $\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_F$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_F$. Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ specifically not be [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative]]. Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be such that the ...
Let $S$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrices]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order $2$]] over the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$. $S$ is not a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]], as for example: :$\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{...
Non-Commutative Ring with Unity and 2 Ideals not necessarily Division Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Commutative_Ring_with_Unity_and_2_Ideals_not_necessarily_Division_Ring
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Commutative_Ring_with_Unity_and_2_Ideals_not_necessarily_Division_Ring
[ "Division Rings", "Rings with Unity", "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Division Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Proper Zero Divisor", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Zero Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Element"...
proofwiki-15679
General Antiperiodicity Property
Let $f: X \to X$ be an antiperiodic function, where $X$ is either $\R$ or $\C$. Let $L$ be an antiperiodic element of $f$. Let $n \in \Z$ be an integer. :If $n$ is even, then $n L$ is a periodic element of $f$. :If $n$ is odd, then $n L$ is an antiperiodic element of $f$.
Suppose that $X = \C$.
Let $f: X \to X$ be an [[Definition:Antiperiodic Function|antiperiodic function]], where $X$ is either $\R$ or $\C$. Let $L$ be an [[Definition:Antiperiodic Element|antiperiodic element]] of $f$. Let $n \in \Z$ be an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. :If $n$ is [[Definition:Even Integer|even]], then $n L$ is a [[Defi...
Suppose that $X = \C$.
General Antiperiodicity Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/General_Antiperiodicity_Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/General_Antiperiodicity_Property
[ "Antiperiodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Antiperiodic Function", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiodic Element", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Periodic Function/Periodic Element", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiodic Element" ]
[]
proofwiki-15680
Antiperiodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real anti-periodic function with anti-period $A$. Let $L$ be an anti-periodic element of $f$. Then $A \divides L$.
{{AimForCont}} that $A \nmid L$. By the Division Theorem we have: :$\exists! q \in \Z, r \in \R: L = q A + r, 0 < r < A$ By Even and Odd Integers form Partition of Integers, it follows that $q$ must be either even or odd.
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Antiperiodic Function|real anti-periodic function]] with [[Definition:Antiperiod|anti-period]] $A$. Let $L$ be an [[Definition:Antiperiodic Element|anti-periodic element]] of $f$. Then $A \divides L$.
{{AimForCont}} that $A \nmid L$. By the [[Division Theorem/Real Number Index|Division Theorem]] we have: :$\exists! q \in \Z, r \in \R: L = q A + r, 0 < r < A$ By [[Even and Odd Integers form Partition of Integers]], it follows that $q$ must be either [[Definition:Even Integer|even]] or [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd]]...
Antiperiodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Antiperiodic_Element_is_Multiple_of_Antiperiod
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Antiperiodic_Element_is_Multiple_of_Antiperiod
[ "Antiperiodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Real", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiod", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiodic Element" ]
[ "Division Theorem/Real Number Index", "Even and Odd Integers form Partition of Integers", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer" ]
proofwiki-15681
Differential Entropy of Exponential Distribution
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable of the exponential distribution with parameter $\beta$ for some $\beta \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the differential entropy of $X$, $\map h X$, is given by: :$\map h X = 1 + \map \ln \beta$
From the definition of the exponential distribution, $X$ has probability density function: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 \beta e^{-\frac x \beta}$ From the definition of differential entropy: :$\ds \map h X = -\int_0^\infty \map {f_X} x \map \ln {\map {f_X} x} \rd x$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map h X | r = -\fr...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]] of the [[Definition:Exponential Distribution|exponential distribution]] with parameter $\beta$ for some $\beta \in \R_{> 0}$. Then the [[Definition:Differential Entropy|differential entropy]] of $X$, $\map h X$, is given by: :$\map h ...
From the definition of the [[Definition:Exponential Distribution|exponential distribution]], $X$ has [[Definition:Probability Density Function|probability density function]]: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 \beta e^{-\frac x \beta}$ From the definition of [[Definition:Differential Entropy|differential entropy]]: :$\ds \m...
Differential Entropy of Exponential Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Differential_Entropy_of_Exponential_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Differential_Entropy_of_Exponential_Distribution
[ "Differential Entropy", "Exponential Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Exponential Distribution", "Definition:Differential Entropy" ]
[ "Definition:Exponential Distribution", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Definition:Differential Entropy", "Reciprocal of Logarithm", "Sum of Logarithms", "Primitive of Exponential Function", "Integration by Parts", "Exponential Tends to Zero and Infinity", "Limit at Infinity of Polynomial...
proofwiki-15682
Skewness of Poisson Distribution
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable with a Poisson distribution with parameter $\lambda$. Then the skewness $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is given by: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt \lambda}$
From Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \sigma^2 - \mu^3} {\sigma^3}$ where $\mu$ is the mean of $X$, and $\sigma$ the standard deviation. We have, by Expectation of Poisson Distribution: :$\expect X = \lambda$ By Variance of Poisson Distribution: :$\var X = \sigma^2 ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with a [[Definition:Poisson Distribution|Poisson distribution with parameter $\lambda$]]. Then the [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]] $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is given by: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt \lambda}$
From [[Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments]]: :$\gamma_1 = \dfrac {\expect {X^3} - 3 \mu \sigma^2 - \mu^3} {\sigma^3}$ where $\mu$ is the [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] of $X$, and $\sigma$ the [[Definition:Standard Deviation|standard deviation]]. We have, by [[Expectation of Poisson Distribution]]: :$\expe...
Skewness of Poisson Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Poisson_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Poisson_Distribution
[ "Skewness", "Poisson Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Poisson Distribution", "Definition:Skewness" ]
[ "Skewness in terms of Non-Central Moments", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Standard Deviation", "Expectation of Poisson Distribution", "Variance of Poisson Distribution", "Definition:Moment Generating Function", "Moment Generating Function of Poisson Distribution", "Moment in terms of Moment Ge...
proofwiki-15683
Periodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real anti-periodic function with anti-period $A$. Let $L$ be a periodic element of $f$. Then $A \divides L$.
Consider $A + L$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x + \paren {A + L} } | r = \map f {\paren {x + A} + L} }} {{eqn | r = \map f {x + A} }} {{eqn | r = -\map f x }} {{end-eqn}} Hence $A + L$ is an anti-periodic element of $f$. Combining Antiperiodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod, Divides is Reflexive, and Com...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Antiperiodic Function|real anti-periodic function]] with [[Definition:Antiperiod|anti-period]] $A$. Let $L$ be a [[Definition:Periodic Element|periodic element]] of $f$. Then $A \divides L$.
Consider $A + L$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f {x + \paren {A + L} } | r = \map f {\paren {x + A} + L} }} {{eqn | r = \map f {x + A} }} {{eqn | r = -\map f x }} {{end-eqn}} Hence $A + L$ is an [[Definition:Antiperiodic Element|anti-periodic element]] of $f$. Combining [[Antiperiodic Element is Multiple of ...
Periodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Periodic_Element_is_Multiple_of_Antiperiod
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Periodic_Element_is_Multiple_of_Antiperiod
[ "Antiperiodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Real", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiod", "Definition:Periodic Function/Periodic Element" ]
[ "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiodic Element", "Antiperiodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod", "Integer Divisor Results/Integer Divides Itself", "Common Divisor Divides Difference", "Category:Antiperiodic Functions" ]
proofwiki-15684
Skewness of Continuous Uniform Distribution
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable which is uniformly distributed on a closed real interval $\closedint a b$. Then the skewness $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
From the definition of skewness: :$\gamma_1 = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3}$ where: :$\mu$ is the mean of $X$ :$\sigma$ is the standard deviation of $X$. From the definition of the continuous uniform distribution, $X$ has probability density function: :$\map {f_X} x = \dfrac 1 {b - a}$ So, from Expect...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]] which is [[Definition:Continuous Uniform Distribution|uniformly distributed]] on a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]] $\closedint a b$. Then the [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]] $\gamma_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
From the definition of [[Definition:Skewness|skewness]]: :$\gamma_1 = \expect {\paren {\dfrac {X - \mu} \sigma}^3}$ where: :$\mu$ is the [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] of $X$ :$\sigma$ is the [[Definition:Standard Deviation|standard deviation]] of $X$. From the definition of the [[Definition:Continuous Uniform ...
Skewness of Continuous Uniform Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Skewness_of_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution
[ "Skewness", "Continuous Uniform Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Continuous", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Skewness" ]
[ "Definition:Skewness", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Standard Deviation", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Continuous", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Expectation of Function of Continuous Random Variable", "Expectation of Continuous Uniform Distribution", "Integration by Substitu...
proofwiki-15685
Double of Antiperiod is Period
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real antiperiodic function with an anti-period of $A$. Then $f$ is also periodic with a period of $2A$.
Let $L_f$ be the set of all periodic elements of $f$. By Periodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod and Absolute Value of Real Number is not less than Divisors: :$\forall p \in L_f: A \divides p \land A \le p$ Suppose there is a $p \in L_f$ such that $p = A$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | r = \map ...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Antiperiodic Function|real antiperiodic function]] with an [[Definition:Antiperiod|anti-period]] of $A$. Then $f$ is also [[Definition:Real Periodic Function|periodic]] with a [[Definition:Period of Periodic Real Function|period]] of $2A$.
Let $L_f$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Periodic Element|periodic elements]] of $f$. By [[Periodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod]] and [[Absolute Value of Real Number is not less than Divisors]]: :$\forall p \in L_f: A \divides p \land A \le p$ Suppose there is a $p \in L_f$ such that $p = A$...
Double of Antiperiod is Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_of_Antiperiod_is_Period
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_of_Antiperiod_is_Period
[ "Antiperiodic Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Real", "Definition:Antiperiodic Function/Antiperiod", "Definition:Periodic Function/Real", "Definition:Periodic Real Function/Period" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Periodic Function/Periodic Element", "Periodic Element is Multiple of Antiperiod", "Absolute Value of Real Number is not less than Divisors", "Constant Function has no Period", "Definition:Smallest Element/Subset", "Double of Antiperiodic Element is Periodic", "Definition...
proofwiki-15686
Principal Ideal in Integral Domain generated by Power Plus One is Subset of Principal Ideal generated by Power
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an integral domain whose unity is $1_D$. Let $a \in D$ be a proper element of $D$. Then: :$\forall n \in \Z_{\ge 0}: \ideal {a^{n + 1} } \subsetneq \ideal {a_n}$ where $\ideal x$ denotes the principal ideal of $D$ generated by $x$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = \ideal {a^{n + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists r \in D | l = x | r = r \circ a^{n + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | r = \paren {r \circ a} \circ a^n | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leads...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_D$. Let $a \in D$ be a [[Definition:Proper Element of Ring|proper element]] of $D$. Then: :$\forall n \in \Z_{\ge 0}: \ideal {a^{n + 1} } \subsetneq \ideal {a_n}$ where $\ideal x$ denotes ...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = \ideal {a^{n + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \exists r \in D | l = x | r = r \circ a^{n + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | r = \paren {r \circ a} \circ a^n | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \lead...
Principal Ideal in Integral Domain generated by Power Plus One is Subset of Principal Ideal generated by Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principal_Ideal_in_Integral_Domain_generated_by_Power_Plus_One_is_Subset_of_Principal_Ideal_generated_by_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principal_Ideal_in_Integral_Domain_generated_by_Power_Plus_One_is_Subset_of_Principal_Ideal_generated_by_Power
[ "Integral Domains", "Principal Ideals of Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Proper Element of Ring", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Cancellation Law for Ring Product of Integral Domain", "Definition:Unit of Ring", "Definition:Contradiction", "Definition:Proper Element of Ring", "Proof by Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-15687
Non-Field Integral Domain has Infinite Number of Ideals
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an integral domain which is not a field. Then $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ has an infinite number of distinct ideals.
Let $a \in D$ be a proper element of $D$. Because $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ is not a field, such an element is known to exist. From Principal Ideal in Integral Domain generated by Power Plus One is Subset of Principal Ideal generated by Power: :$\forall n \in \Z_{\ge 0}: \ideal {a^{n + 1} } \subsetneq \ideal {a_n}$ where...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] which is not a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Then $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ has an [[Definition:Infinite Set|infinite number]] of [[Definition:Distinct Elements|distinct]] [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]].
Let $a \in D$ be a [[Definition:Proper Element of Ring|proper element]] of $D$. Because $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ is not a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]], such an [[Definition:Element|element]] is known to exist. From [[Principal Ideal in Integral Domain generated by Power Plus One is Subset of Principa...
Non-Field Integral Domain has Infinite Number of Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Field_Integral_Domain_has_Infinite_Number_of_Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Field_Integral_Domain_has_Infinite_Number_of_Ideals
[ "Integral Domains", "Ideals of Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Distinct/Plural", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Proper Element of Ring", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Element", "Principal Ideal in Integral Domain generated by Power Plus One is Subset of Principal Ideal generated by Power", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Infinite Set" ]
proofwiki-15688
Ring Homomorphism from Ring with Unity to Integral Domain Preserves Unity
Let $\struct {R, +_R, \circ_R}$ be a ring with unity whose zero is $0_R$ and whose unity is $1_R$. Let $\struct {D, +_D, \circ_D}$ be an integral domain whose zero is $0_D$ and whose unity is $1_D$. Let $\phi: R \to D$ be a ring homomorphism such that: :$\map \ker \phi \ne R$ where $\map \ker \phi$ denotes the kernel o...
{{AimForCont}} $\map \phi {1_R} = 0_D$. Let $x \in R$ be arbitrary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi x | r = \map \phi {x \circ_R 1_R} | c = {{Defof|Unity of Ring}} }} {{eqn | r = \map \phi x \circ_D \map \phi {1_R} | c = {{Defof|Ring Homomorphism}} }} {{eqn | r = \map \phi x \circ_D 0_D ...
Let $\struct {R, +_R, \circ_R}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_R$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_R$. Let $\struct {D, +_D, \circ_D}$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_D$ and w...
{{AimForCont}} $\map \phi {1_R} = 0_D$. Let $x \in R$ be arbitrary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \phi x | r = \map \phi {x \circ_R 1_R} | c = {{Defof|Unity of Ring}} }} {{eqn | r = \map \phi x \circ_D \map \phi {1_R} | c = {{Defof|Ring Homomorphism}} }} {{eqn | r = \map \phi x \circ_D 0_D ...
Ring Homomorphism from Ring with Unity to Integral Domain Preserves Unity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ring_Homomorphism_from_Ring_with_Unity_to_Integral_Domain_Preserves_Unity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ring_Homomorphism_from_Ring_with_Unity_to_Integral_Domain_Preserves_Unity
[ "Ring Homomorphisms", "Rings with Unity", "Integral Domains" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Ring Homomorphism", "Definition:Kernel of Ring Homomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Definition:Contradiction", "Cancellation Law for Ring Product of Integral Domain" ]
proofwiki-15689
Unity plus Negative of Nilpotent Ring Element is Unit
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring with unity whose zero is $0_R$ and whose unity is $1_R$. Let $x \in R$ be nilpotent. Then $1_R - x$ is a unit of $R$.
By definition of nilpotent element: :$x^n = 0_R$ for some $n \in \Z_{>0}$. From Difference of Two Powers: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a^n - b^n | r = \paren {a - b} \circ \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} a^{n - j - 1} \circ b^j | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {a - b} \circ \paren {a^{n - 1} + a^{n - 2} \circ b + a^{...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_R$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_R$. Let $x \in R$ be [[Definition:Nilpotent Ring Element|nilpotent]]. Then $1_R - x$ is a [[Definition:Unit of Ring|unit]] of $R$.
By definition of [[Definition:Nilpotent Ring Element|nilpotent element]]: :$x^n = 0_R$ for some $n \in \Z_{>0}$. From [[Difference of Two Powers]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a^n - b^n | r = \paren {a - b} \circ \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} a^{n - j - 1} \circ b^j | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {a - b} \c...
Unity plus Negative of Nilpotent Ring Element is Unit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_plus_Negative_of_Nilpotent_Ring_Element_is_Unit
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unity_plus_Negative_of_Nilpotent_Ring_Element_is_Unit
[ "Nilpotent Ring Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Nilpotent Ring Element", "Definition:Unit of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Nilpotent Ring Element", "Difference of Two Powers", "Definition:Product Inverse", "Definition:Unit of Ring" ]
proofwiki-15690
Quotient of Commutative Ring by Nilradical is Reduced
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a commutative ring whose zero is $0_R$ and whose unity is $1_R$. Let $\struct {N, +, \circ}$ denote the nilradical of $R$. The quotient ring $R / N$ is a reduced ring.
From Nilpotent Elements of Commutative Ring form Ideal, $\struct {N, +, \circ}$ is an ideal of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$. Hence the quotient ring $R / N$ is defined. By definition of the ideal of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$, $N$ is the zero of $R / N$. Let $\paren {x + N}^n \in N$. Then: :$x^n \in N$ and so: :$\paren {x^n}^m...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Commutative Ring|commutative ring]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_R$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_R$. Let $\struct {N, +, \circ}$ denote the [[Definition:Nilradical of Ring|nilradical]] of $R$. The [[Definition:Quotient Ring|quotient rin...
From [[Nilpotent Elements of Commutative Ring form Ideal]], $\struct {N, +, \circ}$ is an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$. Hence the [[Definition:Quotient Ring|quotient ring]] $R / N$ is defined. By definition of the [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $\struct {R, +, \circ}$, $N$ is ...
Quotient of Commutative Ring by Nilradical is Reduced
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_of_Commutative_Ring_by_Nilradical_is_Reduced
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_of_Commutative_Ring_by_Nilradical_is_Reduced
[ "Nilpotent Ring Elements", "Commutative Rings", "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Nilradical of Ring", "Definition:Quotient Ring", "Definition:Reduced Ring" ]
[ "Nilpotent Elements of Commutative Ring form Ideal", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Quotient Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Coset/Left Coset", "Definition:Nilpotent Ring Element", "Definition:Coset/Left Coset" ]
proofwiki-15691
Self-Inverse Element of Integral Domain is Unity or its Negative
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an integral domain whose zero is $0_D$ and whose unity is $1_D$. Let $x \in D$ such that $x^2 = 1_D$. Then either $x = 1_D$ or $x = -1_D$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^2 | r = 1_D | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \paren {x + 1_D} \paren {x + \paren {-1_D} } | r = 0_D | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x + 1_D | r = 0_D | c = }} {{eqn | lo= \lor | l = x + \paren {-1_D} | r = 0_D | c = ...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_D$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_D$. Let $x \in D$ such that $x^2 = 1_D$. Then either $x = 1_D$ or $x = -1_D$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x^2 | r = 1_D | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \paren {x + 1_D} \paren {x + \paren {-1_D} } | r = 0_D | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x + 1_D | r = 0_D | c = }} {{eqn | lo= \lor | l = x + \paren {-1_D} | r = 0_D | c = ...
Self-Inverse Element of Integral Domain is Unity or its Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Self-Inverse_Element_of_Integral_Domain_is_Unity_or_its_Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Self-Inverse_Element_of_Integral_Domain_is_Unity_or_its_Negative
[ "Integral Domains" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring" ]
[]
proofwiki-15692
Product of Units of Integral Domain with Finite Number of Units
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an integral domain whose zero is $0_D$ and whose unity is $1_D$. Let $D$ have a finite number of units. Let $U_D$ be the set of units of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$. Then: :$\ds \prod_{x \mathop \in U_D} x = -1_D$
Consider the set $S$ defined as: :$S = U_R \setminus \set {1_D, -1_D}$ If $S$ has even cardinality, it can be partitioned into doubletons of the form $\set {u, u^{-1} }$. Each of these doubletons has a product of $1_D$. The product of all these with $1_D$ and $-1_D$ is $-1_D$. It remains to be shown that $S$ cannot be ...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] whose [[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] is $0_D$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Ring|unity]] is $1_D$. Let $D$ have a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite number]] of [[Definition:Unit of Ring|units]]. Let $U_D$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [...
Consider the [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$ defined as: :$S = U_R \setminus \set {1_D, -1_D}$ If $S$ has [[Definition:Even Integer|even]] [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]], it can be [[Definition:Set Partition|partitioned]] into [[Definition:Doubleton|doubletons]] of the form $\set {u, u^{-1} }$. Each of these [[Def...
Product of Units of Integral Domain with Finite Number of Units
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Units_of_Integral_Domain_with_Finite_Number_of_Units
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Units_of_Integral_Domain_with_Finite_Number_of_Units
[ "Integral Domains" ]
[ "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unity (Abstract Algebra)/Ring", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Unit of Ring", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Unit of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Set Partition", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Product", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)/Product", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Cardinality", "Defi...
proofwiki-15693
Prime Ideals of Ring of Integers
Let $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ denote the ring of integers. Let $J$ be a prime ideal of $\Z$. Then either: :$J = \set 0$ or: :$J = \ideal p$ where: :$p$ is a prime number :$\ideal p$ denotes the principal ideal of $\Z$ generated by $p$.
From Prime Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Integral Domain: :$J$ is a prime ideal of $\Z$ {{iff}} $\Z / J$ is an integral domain. From Quotient Ring of Integers and Zero: :$\Z / \set 0 \cong \Z$ As $\Z$ is an integral domain, it follows that $\set 0$ is a prime ideal of $\Z$. From Quotient Ring of Integers with Principal Id...
Let $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ denote the [[Definition:Ring of Integers|ring of integers]]. Let $J$ be a [[Definition:Prime Ideal of Commutative and Unitary Ring|prime ideal]] of $\Z$. Then either: :$J = \set 0$ or: :$J = \ideal p$ where: :$p$ is a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]] :$\ideal p$ denotes the [[De...
From [[Prime Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Integral Domain]]: :$J$ is a [[Definition:Prime Ideal of Commutative and Unitary Ring|prime ideal]] of $\Z$ {{iff}} $\Z / J$ is an [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]]. From [[Quotient Ring of Integers and Zero]]: :$\Z / \set 0 \cong \Z$ As $\Z$ is an [[Definition:Int...
Prime Ideals of Ring of Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Ideals_of_Ring_of_Integers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Ideals_of_Ring_of_Integers
[ "Integers", "Prime Ideals of Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring of Integers", "Definition:Prime Ideal of Ring/Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Prime Ideal iff Quotient Ring is Integral Domain", "Definition:Prime Ideal of Ring/Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Quotient Ring of Integers and Zero", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Prime Ideal of Ring/Commutative and Unitary Ring", "Quotient Ring of Integers w...
proofwiki-15694
Prime Power Mapping on Galois Field is Automorphism
Let $\GF$ be a Galois field whose zero is $0_\GF$ and whose characteristic is $p$. Let $\sigma: \GF \to \GF$ be defined as: :$\forall x \in \GF: \map \sigma x = x^p$ Then $\sigma$ is an automorphism of $\GF$.
Let $x, y \in \GF$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sigma {x y} | r = \paren {x y}^p | c = Definition of $\sigma$ }} {{eqn | r = x^p y^p | c = Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Group }} {{eqn | r = \map \sigma x \map \sigma y | c = Definition of $\sigma$ }} {{end-eqn}} and: {{beg...
Let $\GF$ be a [[Definition:Galois Field|Galois field]] whose [[Definition:Field Zero|zero]] is $0_\GF$ and whose [[Definition:Characteristic of Field|characteristic]] is $p$. Let $\sigma: \GF \to \GF$ be defined as: :$\forall x \in \GF: \map \sigma x = x^p$ Then $\sigma$ is an [[Definition:Field Automorphism|automo...
Let $x, y \in \GF$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \sigma {x y} | r = \paren {x y}^p | c = Definition of $\sigma$ }} {{eqn | r = x^p y^p | c = [[Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Group]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \sigma x \map \sigma y | c = Definition of $\sigma$ }} {{end-eqn}} an...
Prime Power Mapping on Galois Field is Automorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Power_Mapping_on_Galois_Field_is_Automorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Prime_Power_Mapping_on_Galois_Field_is_Automorphism
[ "Galois Fields", "Field Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Galois Field", "Definition:Field Zero", "Definition:Characteristic of Field", "Definition:Field Automorphism" ]
[ "Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Group", "Binomial Theorem", "Power of Sum Modulo Prime", "Definition:Field Homomorphism", "Congruence of Powers", "Congruence of Powers", "Kernel is Trivial iff Monomorphism", "Definition:Ring Monomorphism", "Definition:Injection", "Injection from Finit...
proofwiki-15695
Additive Group and Multiplicative Group of Field are not Isomorphic
Let $\struct {F, +, \times}$ be a field whose zero is $0_F$ and whose unity is $1_F$. Let $\struct {F, +}$ denote the additive group of $F$. Let $\struct {F_{\ne 0_F}, \times}$ denote the multiplicative group of $F$. Then $\struct {F, +}$ and $\struct {F_{\ne 0_F}, \times}$ are not isomorphic to each other.
{{AimForCont}} $\phi: \struct {F_{\ne 0_F}, \times} \to \struct {F, +}$ is an isomorphism. By definition: :$0_F$ is the identity of $\struct {F, +}$ and :$1_F$ is the identity of $\struct {F_{\ne 0_F}, \times}$. We have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 0_F | r = \map \phi {1_F} | c = Epimorphism Preserves Id...
Let $\struct {F, +, \times}$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] whose [[Definition:Field Zero|zero]] is $0_F$ and whose [[Definition:Unity of Field|unity]] is $1_F$. Let $\struct {F, +}$ denote the [[Definition:Additive Group of Ring|additive group]] of $F$. Let $\struct {F_{\ne 0_F}, \times}$ denote ...
{{AimForCont}} $\phi: \struct {F_{\ne 0_F}, \times} \to \struct {F, +}$ is an [[Definition:Group Isomorphism|isomorphism]]. By definition: :$0_F$ is the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] of $\struct {F, +}$ and :$1_F$ is the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] of $\struct {F_{\ne 0_F}, \times}$. We have ...
Additive Group and Multiplicative Group of Field are not Isomorphic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Additive_Group_and_Multiplicative_Group_of_Field_are_not_Isomorphic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Additive_Group_and_Multiplicative_Group_of_Field_are_not_Isomorphic
[ "Field Theory", "Group Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Field Zero", "Definition:Multiplicative Identity", "Definition:Additive Group of Ring", "Definition:Multiplicative Group", "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/Group Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Isomorphism (Abstract Algebra)/Group Isomorphism", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Epimorphism Preserves Identity", "Definition:Characteristic of Field", "Definition:Characteristic of Field", "Definiti...
proofwiki-15696
First Central Moment is Zero
Let $X$ be a random variable on some probability space with mean $\mu$. Then the first central moment $\mu_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mu_1 | r = \expect {X - \mu} | c = {{Defof|Central Moment}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect X - \mu | c = Expectation is Linear }} {{eqn | r = \mu - \mu | c = $\expect X = \mu$ }} {{eqn | r = 0 }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Expectation 9gwdh5c494qd88bkn754udl1c7f0djq
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]] on some [[Definition:Probability Space|probability space]] with [[Definition:Expectation|mean]] $\mu$. Then the first [[Definition:Central Moment|central moment]] $\mu_1$ of $X$ is equal to $0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mu_1 | r = \expect {X - \mu} | c = {{Defof|Central Moment}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect X - \mu | c = [[Expectation is Linear]] }} {{eqn | r = \mu - \mu | c = $\expect X = \mu$ }} {{eqn | r = 0 }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Expectation]] 9gwdh5c494qd88bkn754udl1c7f0djq
First Central Moment is Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Central_Moment_is_Zero
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First_Central_Moment_is_Zero
[ "Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Probability Space", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Central Moment" ]
[ "Expectation is Linear", "Category:Expectation" ]
proofwiki-15697
Principal Ideal Domain cannot have Infinite Strictly Increasing Sequence of Ideals
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a principal ideal domain. Then $D$ cannot have an infinite sequence of ideals $\sequence {j_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ such that: :$\forall n \in \N: J_n \subsetneq j_{n + 1}$
Let $K = \ds \bigcup_{n \mathop \in \N} J_n$. Then from Increasing Union of Sequence of Ideals is Ideal, $K$ is an ideal of $D$. We have that $D$ is a principal ideal domain. Hence there exists $a \in D$ such that: :$K = \ideal a$ where $\ideal a$ is the principal ideal of $D$ generated by $a$. But $a \in J_m$ for some...
Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Principal Ideal Domain|principal ideal domain]]. Then $D$ cannot have an [[Definition:Infinite Sequence|infinite sequence]] of [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideals]] $\sequence {j_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ such that: :$\forall n \in \N: J_n \subsetneq j_{n + 1}$
Let $K = \ds \bigcup_{n \mathop \in \N} J_n$. Then from [[Increasing Union of Sequence of Ideals is Ideal]], $K$ is an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $D$. We have that $D$ is a [[Definition:Principal Ideal Domain|principal ideal domain]]. Hence there exists $a \in D$ such that: :$K = \ideal a$ where $\ideal a...
Principal Ideal Domain cannot have Infinite Strictly Increasing Sequence of Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principal_Ideal_Domain_cannot_have_Infinite_Strictly_Increasing_Sequence_of_Ideals
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principal_Ideal_Domain_cannot_have_Infinite_Strictly_Increasing_Sequence_of_Ideals
[ "Principal Ideal Domains" ]
[ "Definition:Principal Ideal Domain", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Increasing Union of Ideals is Ideal/Sequence", "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Principal Ideal Domain", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-15698
Field Norm of Complex Number is Positive Definite
Let $\C$ denote the set of complex numbers. Let $N: \C \to \R_{\ge 0}$ denote the field norm on complex numbers: :$\forall z \in \C: \map N z = \cmod z^2$ where $\cmod z$ denotes the complex modulus of $z$. Then $N$ is positive definite on $\C$.
First it is shown that $\map N z = 0 \iff z = 0$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = z | r = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 0 + 0 i | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map N z | r = 0^2 + 0^2 | c = Definition of $N$ }} {{eqn | r = 0 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Let $z = x + i y$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eq...
Let $\C$ denote the [[Definition:Complex Number|set of complex numbers]]. Let $N: \C \to \R_{\ge 0}$ denote the [[Definition:Field Norm of Complex Number|field norm on complex numbers]]: :$\forall z \in \C: \map N z = \cmod z^2$ where $\cmod z$ denotes the [[Definition:Complex Modulus|complex modulus]] of $z$. Then ...
First it is shown that $\map N z = 0 \iff z = 0$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = z | r = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | r = 0 + 0 i | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map N z | r = 0^2 + 0^2 | c = Definition of $N$ }} {{eqn | r = 0 | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Let $z = x + i y$. {{begin-eqn}} ...
Field Norm of Complex Number is Positive Definite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_Norm_of_Complex_Number_is_Positive_Definite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Field_Norm_of_Complex_Number_is_Positive_Definite
[ "Field Norm of Complex Number" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Field Norm of Complex Number", "Definition:Complex Modulus", "Definition:Positive Definite (Ring)" ]
[ "Square of Real Number is Non-Negative", "Square of Real Number is Non-Negative", "Definition:Positive Definite (Ring)", "Category:Field Norm of Complex Number" ]
proofwiki-15699
Second Standardized Moment is One
Let $X$ be a random variable on some probability space with standard deviation $\sigma$. Then the second standardized moment $\alpha_2$ of $X$ is equal to $1$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \alpha_2 | r = \frac {\mu_2} {\sigma^2} | c = {{Defof|Standardized Moment}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\sigma^2} {\sigma^2} | c = {{Defof|Central Moment}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Expectation dlu8n91xg9zxqqrmbrwvdx0oozdkyaq
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]] on some [[Definition:Probability Space|probability space]] with [[Definition:Standard Deviation|standard deviation]] $\sigma$. Then the second [[Definition:Standardized Moment|standardized moment]] $\alpha_2$ of $X$ is equal to $1$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \alpha_2 | r = \frac {\mu_2} {\sigma^2} | c = {{Defof|Standardized Moment}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\sigma^2} {\sigma^2} | c = {{Defof|Central Moment}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Expectation]] dlu8n91xg9zxqqrmbrwvdx0oozdkyaq
Second Standardized Moment is One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Standardized_Moment_is_One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second_Standardized_Moment_is_One
[ "Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Probability Space", "Definition:Standard Deviation", "Definition:Standardized Moment" ]
[ "Category:Expectation" ]