id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-16900
Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Then $M$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$
A minimally inductive class under $g$ is the same thing as a minimally closed class under $g$ with respect to $\O$. The result then follows by a direct application of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest. {{qed}}
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Then $M$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq...
A [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive class under $g$]] is the same thing as a [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed class under $g$ with respect to $\O$]]. The result then follows by a direct application of [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping ...
Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_induces_Nest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_induces_Nest/Proof_2
[ "Progressing Mappings", "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest" ]
proofwiki-16901
Sandwich Principle
Let $A$ be a class. Let $g: A \to A$ be a mapping on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there is no element $y$ of $A$ such that: :$x \subset y \subset \map g x$ w...
From Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest, we have that $M$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the Sandwich Principle applies directly. {{qed}}
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let $g: A \to A$ be a [[Definition:Class Mapping|mapping]] on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there...
From [[Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]], we have that $M$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the [[Sandwich Principle]] applies directly. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_1
[ "Well-Orderings", "Named Theorems", "Sandwich Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Proper Subset" ]
[ "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory", "Sandwich Principle" ]
proofwiki-16902
Sandwich Principle
Let $A$ be a class. Let $g: A \to A$ be a mapping on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there is no element $y$ of $A$ such that: :$x \subset y \subset \map g x$ w...
By definition of minimally inductive class, $M$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $\O$. The result is then seen to be a direct application of Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class. {{qed}}
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let $g: A \to A$ be a [[Definition:Class Mapping|mapping]] on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there...
By definition of [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive class]], $M$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $\O$]]. The result is then seen to be a direct application of [[Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class]]. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_2
[ "Well-Orderings", "Named Theorems", "Sandwich Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Proper Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class" ]
proofwiki-16903
Sandwich Principle
Let $A$ be a class. Let $g: A \to A$ be a mapping on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there is no element $y$ of $A$ such that: :$x \subset y \subset \map g x$ w...
We are given that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Let $x, y \in A$ such that: :$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x$ {{AimForCont}} both $x \subset y$ and $y \subset \map g x$. From $x \subset y$, it follows by definition of proper subset that: :$\exists a \in y: a \notin x$ and s...
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let $g: A \to A$ be a [[Definition:Class Mapping|mapping]] on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there...
We are given that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Let $x, y \in A$ such that: :$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x$ {{AimForCont}} both $x \subset y$ and $y \subset \map g x$. From $x \subset y$, it follows by definition of [[Definition:Proper Subset|proper subset]] that: :...
Sandwich Principle/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_1
[ "Well-Orderings", "Named Theorems", "Sandwich Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Proper Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Proper Subset", "Definition:Proper Subset", "Definition:Contradiction", "Proof by Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-16904
Sandwich Principle
Let $A$ be a class. Let $g: A \to A$ be a mapping on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there is no element $y$ of $A$ such that: :$x \subset y \subset \map g x$ w...
We are given that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Let $x, y \in A$ such that: :$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x$ Then either we have: :$\map g x \subseteq y$ and $y \subseteq \map g x$ in which case, by definition of set equality: :$y = \map g x$ or we have that: :$x \subseteq...
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let $g: A \to A$ be a [[Definition:Class Mapping|mapping]] on $A$ such that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Then: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$ That is, there...
We are given that: :for all $x, y \in A$, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. Let $x, y \in A$ such that: :$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x$ Then either we have: :$\map g x \subseteq y$ and $y \subseteq \map g x$ in which case, by definition of [[Definition:Set Equality|set equality]]: :$y = \map g ...
Sandwich Principle/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_2
[ "Well-Orderings", "Named Theorems", "Sandwich Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Proper Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Set Equality", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-16905
Sandwich Principle/Corollary 1
Let: :$x \subset y$ where $\subset$ denotes a proper subset. Then: :$\map g x \subseteq y$
Let $x \subset y$. By hypothesis, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. But because $x \subset y$, it follows that $y \subseteq x$ cannot be the case. Hence the result. {{Qed}}
Let: :$x \subset y$ where $\subset$ denotes a [[Definition:Proper Subset|proper subset]]. Then: :$\map g x \subseteq y$
Let $x \subset y$. By hypothesis, either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$. But because $x \subset y$, it follows that $y \subseteq x$ cannot be the case. Hence the result. {{Qed}}
Sandwich Principle/Corollary 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle/Corollary_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle/Corollary_1
[ "Sandwich Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Proper Subset" ]
[]
proofwiki-16906
Sandwich Principle/Corollary 2
Let $g$ be a progressing mapping. Let $x \subseteq y$. Then: :$\map g x \subseteq \map g y$
Let $x \subseteq y$. Suppose $x = y$. Then $\map g x \subseteq \map g y$ and the result holds. {{qed|lemma}} Suppose that $x \ne y$. Then $x \subset y$ It follows from {{Corollary|Sandwich Principle|1}} that: :$\map g x \subseteq y$ As $g$ is a progressing mapping on $A$: :$y \subseteq \map g y$ Hence by Subset Relatio...
Let $g$ be a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]]. Let $x \subseteq y$. Then: :$\map g x \subseteq \map g y$
Let $x \subseteq y$. Suppose $x = y$. Then $\map g x \subseteq \map g y$ and the result holds. {{qed|lemma}} Suppose that $x \ne y$. Then $x \subset y$ It follows from {{Corollary|Sandwich Principle|1}} that: :$\map g x \subseteq y$ As $g$ is a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] on $A$: :$y \...
Sandwich Principle/Corollary 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle/Corollary_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle/Corollary_2
[ "Sandwich Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Subset Relation is Transitive" ]
proofwiki-16907
Class under Progressing Mapping such that Elements are Sandwiched is Nest
Let $A$ be a class. Let $g: A \to A$ be a progressing mapping on $A$ such that: :$\forall x, y \in A: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Then $A$ is a nest: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$
By definition of progressing mapping: :$\forall x \in A: x \subseteq \map g x$ Thus by Subset Relation is Transitive: :$\map g x \subseteq y \implies x \subseteq y$ and it follows that: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Hence the result by definition of nest. {{qed}}
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let $g: A \to A$ be a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] on $A$ such that: :$\forall x, y \in A: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Then $A$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]]: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \lor y \sub...
By definition of [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]]: :$\forall x \in A: x \subseteq \map g x$ Thus by [[Subset Relation is Transitive]]: :$\map g x \subseteq y \implies x \subseteq y$ and it follows that: :$\forall x, y \in A: x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Hence the result by definition of [[...
Class under Progressing Mapping such that Elements are Sandwiched is Nest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_such_that_Elements_are_Sandwiched_is_Nest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_such_that_Elements_are_Sandwiched_is_Nest
[ "Progressing Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Subset Relation is Transitive", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory" ]
proofwiki-16908
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Then for all $x, y \in M$:
From Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest, we have that $M$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the Sandwich Principle applies directly. {{qed}}
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Then for all $x, y \in M$:
From [[Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]], we have that $M$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the [[Sandwich Principle]] applies directly. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_1
[ "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory", "Sandwich Principle" ]
proofwiki-16909
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Then for all $x, y \in M$:
By definition of minimally inductive class, $M$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $\O$. The result is then seen to be a direct application of Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class. {{qed}}
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Then for all $x, y \in M$:
By definition of [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive class]], $M$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $\O$]]. The result is then seen to be a direct application of [[Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class]]. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_2
[ "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class" ]
proofwiki-16910
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle
:$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$
From Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest, we have that $M$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the Sandwich Principle applies directly. {{qed}}
:$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$
From [[Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]], we have that $M$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the [[Sandwich Principle]] applies directly. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_1
[ "Sandwich Principle", "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping", "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle" ]
[]
[ "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory", "Sandwich Principle" ]
proofwiki-16911
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle
:$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$
By definition of minimally inductive class, $M$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $\O$. The result is then seen to be a direct application of Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class. {{qed}}
:$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$
By definition of [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive class]], $M$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $\O$]]. The result is then seen to be a direct application of [[Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class]]. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Sandwich_Principle/Proof_2
[ "Sandwich Principle", "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping", "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Sandwich Principle" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class" ]
proofwiki-16912
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Image of Proper Subset is Subset
:$x \subset y \implies \map g x \subseteq y$
From Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest, we have that $M$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus corollary $1$ of the Sandwich Principle applies directly. {{qed}}
:$x \subset y \implies \map g x \subseteq y$
From [[Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]], we have that $M$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus [[Sandwich Principle/Corollary 1|corollary $1$ of the Sandwich Principle]] applies directly. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Image of Proper Subset is Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Image_of_Proper_Subset_is_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Image_of_Proper_Subset_is_Subset
[ "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping" ]
[]
[ "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory", "Sandwich Principle/Corollary 1" ]
proofwiki-16913
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Mapping Preserves Subsets
:$x \subseteq y \implies \map g x \subseteq \map g y$
From Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest, we have that $M$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus corollary $2$ of the Sandwich Principle applies directly. {{qed}}
:$x \subseteq y \implies \map g x \subseteq \map g y$
From [[Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]], we have that $M$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus [[Sandwich Principle/Corollary 2|corollary $2$ of the Sandwich Principle]] applies directly. {{qed}}
Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping/Mapping Preserves Subsets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Mapping_Preserves_Subsets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristics_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Mapping_Preserves_Subsets
[ "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping" ]
[]
[ "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory", "Sandwich Principle/Corollary 2" ]
proofwiki-16914
Bounded Class is Set
Let $B$ be a class. Let it be assumed that $B$ is a subclass of a basic universe $V$. Let $B$ be bounded by a set $x$. Then $B$ is itself a set.
By definition, every element of $B$ is a subset of $x$. Then every element of $B$ is an element of the power set $\powerset x$ of $x$. Thus $B$ is a subclass of $\powerset x$. By the Axiom of Powers, $\powerset x$ is a set. That is, $\powerset x$ is an element of $V$. As $V$ is a swelled class, then by definition, then...
Let $B$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let it be assumed that $B$ is a [[Definition:Subclass|subclass]] of a [[Definition:Basic Universe|basic universe]] $V$. Let $B$ be [[Definition:Set Bounded by Set|bounded]] by a [[Definition:Set|set]] $x$. Then $B$ is itself a [[Definition:Set|set]].
By definition, every [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] of $B$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $x$. Then every [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] of $B$ is an [[Definition:Element|element]] of the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] $\powerset x$ of $x$. Thus $B$ is a [[Definition:Subclass|subclass]] of...
Bounded Class is Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Class_is_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Class_is_Set
[ "Bounded Classes" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Basic Universe", "Definition:Bounded Class/Bounded by Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Subclass", "Axiom:Axiom of Powers/Class Theory", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Swelled Class", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:E...
proofwiki-16915
Non-Empty Bounded Subset of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Then every non-empty bounded subset of $M$ has a greatest element.
Let the hypothesis be assumed. The proof proceeds by general induction. For all $x \in M$, let $\map P x$ be the proposition: :Every non-empty subset of $M$ which is bounded by $x$ has a greatest element. === Basis for the Induction === Let $x = \O$. The only non-empty subset of $M$ which is bounded by $\O$ is $\set \O...
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Then every [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Bounded Subset of Class|bounded subset]] ...
Let the hypothesis be assumed. The proof proceeds by [[Principle of General Induction|general induction]]. For all $x \in M$, let $\map P x$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :Every [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $M$ which is [[Definition:Set Bounded by Set|bounde...
Non-Empty Bounded Subset of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Empty_Bounded_Subset_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_has_Greatest_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Empty_Bounded_Subset_of_Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_has_Greatest_Element/Proof_1
[ "Bounded Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Non-Empty Bounded Subset of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Bounded Class/Bounded Subset of Class", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory" ]
[ "Principle of General Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Bounded Class/Bounded by Set", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Bounded Class/Bounded by Set",...
proofwiki-16916
Projection is Injection iff Factor is Singleton/Family of Sets/Necessary Condition
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a non-empty family of non-empty sets where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $S = \ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the Cartesian product of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $\pr_j: S \to S_j$ be the $j$th projection on $S$. Let $\pr_j$ be an injection. Then $S_i$ is a ...
Let $\pr_j$ be an injection. Then: :$\forall x, y \in S: \map {\pr_j} x = \map {\pr_j} y \implies x = y$ We have that $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ is a non-empty family of non-empty sets Hence, by the axiom of choice (formulation $2$), $S$ is non-empty. Let $z \in S$. By the definition of Cartesian product $S$: :$...
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Indexed Family of Sets|family]] of [[Definition: Non-Empty Set|non-empty sets]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $S = \ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product...
Let $\pr_j$ be an [[Definition:Injection|injection]]. Then: :$\forall x, y \in S: \map {\pr_j} x = \map {\pr_j} y \implies x = y$ We have that $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ is a [[Definition: Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Indexed Family of Sets|family]] of [[Definition: Non-Empty Set|non-empty sets]] H...
Projection is Injection iff Factor is Singleton/Family of Sets/Necessary Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_is_Injection_iff_Factor_is_Singleton/Family_of_Sets/Necessary_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_is_Injection_iff_Factor_is_Singleton/Family_of_Sets/Necessary_Condition
[ "Projection is Injection iff Factor is Singleton" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Sets", "Definition: Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product of Family ", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Injection", "Definition:Singleton" ]
[ "Definition:Injection", "Definition: Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Sets", "Definition: Non-Empty Set", "Axiom:Axiom of Choice/Formulation 2", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Family of Sets" ]
proofwiki-16917
Projection is Injection iff Factor is Singleton/Family of Sets/Sufficient Condition
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a non-empty family of non-empty sets where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $S = \ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the Cartesian product of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $\pr_j: S \to S_j$ be the $j$th projection on $S$. Let $S_i$ be a singleton for all $i \in I \se...
Let $S_i = \set {s_i}$ for all $i \in I \setminus \set {j}$. Let $\map {\pr_j} x = \map {\pr_j} y = s_j$ for $x, y \in S$. By definition of $j$th projection: :$\map x j = \map {\pr_j} x = s_j$ :$\map y j = \map {\pr_j} y = s_j$ and so $\map x j = \map y j$. By the definition of Cartesian product, for all $i \in I \setm...
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Indexed Family of Sets|family]] of [[Definition: Non-Empty Set|non-empty sets]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $S = \ds \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product...
Let $S_i = \set {s_i}$ for all $i \in I \setminus \set {j}$. Let $\map {\pr_j} x = \map {\pr_j} y = s_j$ for $x, y \in S$. By definition of [[Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)|$j$th projection]]: :$\map x j = \map {\pr_j} x = s_j$ :$\map y j = \map {\pr_j} y = s_j$ and so $\map x j = \map y j$. By the defini...
Projection is Injection iff Factor is Singleton/Family of Sets/Sufficient Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_is_Injection_iff_Factor_is_Singleton/Family_of_Sets/Sufficient_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_is_Injection_iff_Factor_is_Singleton/Family_of_Sets/Sufficient_Condition
[ "Projection is Injection iff Factor is Singleton" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Sets", "Definition: Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product of Family ", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Injection" ]
[ "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Family of Sets", "Definition:Injection" ]
proofwiki-16918
Product Space of Subspaces is Subspace of Product Space
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a family of topological spaces where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $\ds T = \struct {X, \tau} = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be the product space of $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $\family {\struct {Y_i, \upsil...
From Cartesian Product of Family of Subsets, $Y \subseteq X$. Thus the topological subspace $T_Y$ is well-defined. From Natural Basis of Product Topology, a (synthetic) basis for $T$ is: :$\ds \BB_T = \set {\prod_{i \mathop \in I} U_i : U_i \in \tau_i, U_i = X_i \text{ for all but finitely many } i \in I}$ From Basis f...
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Indexed Family|family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $\ds T = \struct {X, \tau} = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be the [[Definition:...
From [[Cartesian Product of Family of Subsets]], $Y \subseteq X$. Thus the [[Definition:Topological Subspace|topological subspace]] $T_Y$ is [[Definition:Well-Defined|well-defined]]. From [[Natural Basis of Product Topology]], a [[Definition:Synthetic Basis|(synthetic) basis]] for $T$ is: :$\ds \BB_T = \set {\prod_{...
Product Space of Subspaces is Subspace of Product Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_of_Subspaces_is_Subspace_of_Product_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_of_Subspaces_is_Subspace_of_Product_Space
[ "Product Topology", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Topological Subs...
[ "Cartesian Product of Subsets/Family of Subsets", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Well-Defined", "Natural Basis of Product Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Basis for Topological Subspace", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Cartesian Product of Int...
proofwiki-16919
Difference of Complex Conjugates
Let $z_1, z_2 \in \C$ be complex numbers. Let $\overline z$ denote the complex conjugate of the complex number $z$. Then: :$\overline {z_1 - z_2} = \overline {z_1} - \overline {z_2}$
Let $w = -z_2$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {z_1 - z_2} | r = \overline {z_1 + \paren {-z_2} } | c = {{Defof|Complex Subtraction}} }} {{eqn | r = \overline {z_1 + w} | c = Definition of $w$ }} {{eqn | r = \overline {z_1} + \overline w | c = Sum of Complex Conjugates }} {{eqn | r = ...
Let $z_1, z_2 \in \C$ be [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]]. Let $\overline z$ denote the [[Definition:Complex Conjugate|complex conjugate]] of the [[Definition:Complex Number|complex number]] $z$. Then: :$\overline {z_1 - z_2} = \overline {z_1} - \overline {z_2}$
Let $w = -z_2$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \overline {z_1 - z_2} | r = \overline {z_1 + \paren {-z_2} } | c = {{Defof|Complex Subtraction}} }} {{eqn | r = \overline {z_1 + w} | c = Definition of $w$ }} {{eqn | r = \overline {z_1} + \overline w | c = [[Sum of Complex Conjugates]] }} {{eqn ...
Difference of Complex Conjugates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Complex_Conjugates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Complex_Conjugates
[ "Complex Conjugates", "Complex Subtraction" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Complex Conjugate", "Definition:Complex Number" ]
[ "Sum of Complex Conjugates" ]
proofwiki-16920
Nonzero Natural Number is Successor
Let $\N$ be the $0$-based natural numbers: :$\N = \set {0, 1, 2, \ldots}$ Let $s: \N \to \N: \map s n = n + 1$ be the successor mapping. Then: :$\forall n \in \N \setminus \set 0 \paren {\exists m \in \N: \map s m = n}$
The proof will proceed by the Principle of Finite Induction on $\N \setminus \set 0$.
Let $\N$ be the [[Definition:Natural Numbers|$0$-based natural numbers]]: :$\N = \set {0, 1, 2, \ldots}$ Let $s: \N \to \N: \map s n = n + 1$ be the [[Definition:Successor Mapping|successor mapping]]. Then: :$\forall n \in \N \setminus \set 0 \paren {\exists m \in \N: \map s m = n}$
The proof will proceed by the [[Principle of Finite Induction]] on $\N \setminus \set 0$.
Nonzero Natural Number is Successor
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Nonzero_Natural_Number_is_Successor
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Nonzero_Natural_Number_is_Successor
[ "Proofs by Induction", "Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Successor Mapping" ]
[ "Principle of Finite Induction", "Principle of Finite Induction" ]
proofwiki-16921
Determinant with Columns Transposed
If two columns of a matrix with determinant $D$ are transposed, its determinant becomes $-D$.
Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_n$ be a square matrix of order $n$. Let $\map \det {\mathbf A}$ be the determinant of $\mathbf A$. Let $1 \le r < s \le n$. Let $\mathbf B$ be $\mathbf A$ with columns $r$ and $s$ transposed. Consider: :the transpose $\mathbf A^\intercal$ of $\mathbf A$ :the transpose $\mathbf B^\intercal$ of ...
If two [[Definition:Column of Matrix|columns]] of a [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] with [[Definition:Determinant of Matrix|determinant]] $D$ are [[Definition:Transposition|transposed]], its determinant becomes $-D$.
Let $\mathbf A = \sqbrk a_n$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix of order $n$]]. Let $\map \det {\mathbf A}$ be the [[Definition:Determinant of Matrix|determinant]] of $\mathbf A$. Let $1 \le r < s \le n$. Let $\mathbf B$ be $\mathbf A$ with [[Definition:Column of Matrix|columns]] $r$ and $s$ [[Definition...
Determinant with Columns Transposed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Determinant_with_Columns_Transposed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Determinant_with_Columns_Transposed
[ "Determinants" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Determinant/Matrix", "Definition:Transposition" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Determinant/Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Transposition", "Definition:Transpose of Matrix", "Definition:Transpose of Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Transposition", "Determinant with Rows Transposed", "Determinant of T...
proofwiki-16922
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 1/Lemma 2
:$\pr_i {\restriction_{Y_i} } = p_i$
For all $y \in Y_i$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\pr_i {\restriction_{Y_i} } } y | r = \map {\pr_i} y | c = {{Defof|Restriction of Mapping}}: $\pr_i {\restriction_{Y_i} } : Y_i \to X_i$ }} {{eqn | r = y_i | c = {{Defof|Projection}}: $\pr_i: X \to X_i$ }} {{eqn | r = \map {p_i} y | c = {{Defo...
:$\pr_i {\restriction_{Y_i} } = p_i$
For all $y \in Y_i$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\pr_i {\restriction_{Y_i} } } y | r = \map {\pr_i} y | c = {{Defof|Restriction of Mapping}}: $\pr_i {\restriction_{Y_i} } : Y_i \to X_i$ }} {{eqn | r = y_i | c = {{Defof|Projection}}: $\pr_i: X \to X_i$ }} {{eqn | r = \map {p_i} y | c = {{Def...
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 1/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_1/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_1/Lemma_2
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[]
[ "Equality of Mappings", "Category:Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
proofwiki-16923
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 1/Lemma 1
:$Y_i = \prod_{j \mathop \in I} Z_j$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = x \in Y_i | o = }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | q = \forall j \in I | l = x_j | r = \begin {cases} z_j & j \ne i \\ x_i \in X_i & i = j \end {cases} | c = Definition of $Y_i$ }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | q = \forall j \in I | l = x_j | o =...
:$Y_i = \prod_{j \mathop \in I} Z_j$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = x \in Y_i | o = }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | q = \forall j \in I | l = x_j | r = \begin {cases} z_j & j \ne i \\ x_i \in X_i & i = j \end {cases} | c = Definition of $Y_i$ }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | q = \forall j \in I | l = x_j | o =...
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 1/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_1/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_1/Lemma_1
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Set Equality", "Category:Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
proofwiki-16924
Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $x$ be a fixed point of $g$. Then $x$ is the greatest element of $M$.
Let $x$ be an element of $M$ such that $\map g x = x$. From Empty Set is Subset of All Sets, we have that: :$\O \subseteq x$ Suppose that $y \subseteq x$. Then by Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping: :$\map g y \subseteq \map g x$ But we have that $\map g x = x$. Thus: :$\map g y \sub...
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Fixed Point|fixed point]] of $g$. Then $x$ is the [[Definition:Greatest Set ...
Let $x$ be an [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] of $M$ such that $\map g x = x$. From [[Empty Set is Subset of All Sets]], we have that: :$\O \subseteq x$ Suppose that $y \subseteq x$. Then by [[Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping]]: :$\map g y \subseteq \map g x$ But we ha...
Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Inductive_Class_is_Greatest_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Inductive_Class_is_Greatest_Element/Proof_1
[ "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element", "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Progressing Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Element/Class", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets", "Characteristics of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping", "Principle of General Induction" ]
proofwiki-16925
Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $x$ be a fixed point of $g$. Then $x$ is the greatest element of $M$.
A minimally inductive class under $g$ is the same thing as a minimally closed class under $g$ with respect to $\O$. The result then follows by a direct application of Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element. {{qed}}
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Fixed Point|fixed point]] of $g$. Then $x$ is the [[Definition:Greatest Set ...
A [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive class under $g$]] is the same thing as a [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed class under $g$ with respect to $\O$]]. The result then follows by a direct application of [[Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally C...
Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Inductive_Class_is_Greatest_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Inductive_Class_is_Greatest_Element/Proof_2
[ "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element", "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Progressing Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element" ]
proofwiki-16926
Closed Class under Progressing Mapping Lemma
Let $N$ be a class which is closed under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $g$ be such that: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ :if $\map g x = x$, then $x$ is the greatest element of $N$. Let the following hold: :$A \subseteq N$ is a subclass of $N$ :$x \in N$ is an element of $N$ Let $x$ be: ...
Let the hypothesis be assumed. Let $A$ be an arbitrary non-empty subclass of $N$. Let $L$ be the class of all elements $y$ of $N$ such that $y$ is a proper subset of all elements of $A$. Let $x$ be the greatest element of $L$. It is to be shown that $\map g x$ is the smallest element of $A$. We have that $x$ is a prope...
Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Closed Class under Mapping|closed]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $g$ be such that: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ :if $\map g x = x$, then $x$ is the [[Definition:Grea...
Let the hypothesis be assumed. Let $A$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Non-Empty Class|non-empty]] [[Definition:Subclass|subclass]] of $N$. Let $L$ be the [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] of all [[Definition:Element of Class|elements]] $y$ of $N$ such that $y$ is a [[Definition:Proper Subset|proper subset]] of ...
Closed Class under Progressing Mapping Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_Lemma
[ "Progressing Mappings", "Closedness under Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Proper Subset", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Greates...
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set/Class Theory", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Proper Subset", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "De...
proofwiki-16927
Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered under Subset Relation
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $x$ be a fixed point of $g$. Then $M$ is well-ordered under the subset relation.
According to hypothesis, let $M$ be minimally inductive under $g$. By Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ By Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element: :if $x$ is a fixed point of $g$, ...
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Fixed Point|fixed point]] of $g$. Then $M$ is [[Definition:Well-Ordered Clas...
According to hypothesis, let $M$ be [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under $g$. By [[Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]]: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ By [[Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally...
Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered under Subset Relation/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_is_Well-Ordered_under_Subset_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_is_Well-Ordered_under_Subset_Relation/Proof_1
[ "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Well-Orderings", "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered under Subset Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Well-Ordered Class under Subset Relation", "Definition:Subset Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Inductive Class is Greatest Element", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Close...
proofwiki-16928
Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered under Subset Relation
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $x$ be a fixed point of $g$. Then $M$ is well-ordered under the subset relation.
A minimally inductive class under $g$ is the same thing as a minimally closed class under $g$ with respect to $\O$. The result then follows by a direct application of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered. {{qed}}
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Fixed Point|fixed point]] of $g$. Then $M$ is [[Definition:Well-Ordered Clas...
A [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping|minimally inductive class under $g$]] is the same thing as a [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed class under $g$ with respect to $\O$]]. The result then follows by a direct application of [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping ...
Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered under Subset Relation/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_is_Well-Ordered_under_Subset_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Inductive_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_is_Well-Ordered_under_Subset_Relation/Proof_2
[ "Minimally Inductive Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Well-Orderings", "Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered under Subset Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Well-Ordered Class under Subset Relation", "Definition:Subset Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Inductive Class under General Mapping", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered" ]
proofwiki-16929
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest
For all $x, y \in N$: :either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$ and $N$ forms a nest: :$\forall x, y \in N: x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$
Let $\RR$ be the relation on $N$ defined as: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map \RR {x, y} \iff \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ We are given that $g$ is a progressing mapping. From the Progressing Function Lemma, we have that: {{begin-axiom}} {{axiom | n = 1 | q = \forall y \in \Dom g | ml= \map \RR {y...
For all $x, y \in N$: :either $\map g x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$ and $N$ forms a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]]: :$\forall x, y \in N: x \subseteq y$ or $y \subseteq x$
Let $\RR$ be the [[Definition:Relation (Class Theory)|relation]] on $N$ defined as: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map \RR {x, y} \iff \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ We are given that $g$ is a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]]. From the [[Progressing Function Lemma]], we have that: {{begin-a...
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_induces_Nest
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_induces_Nest/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Nest/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Relation/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Progressing Function Lemma", "Double Induction Principle/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Relation/Class Theory", "Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping", "Rule of Addition", "Double Induction Pri...
proofwiki-16930
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping
Statement of Conditions: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest}} === Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressin...
Let the hypothesis be assumed. The proof proceeds by general induction. For all $x \in N$, let $\map P x$ be the proposition: :Every subset of $N$ which is bounded by $x$ has a greatest element. === Basis for the Induction === Let $x = b$. From Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping, $b$ i...
[[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement|Statement of Conditions]]: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]] === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induce...
Let the hypothesis be assumed. The proof proceeds by [[Principle of General Induction for Minimally Closed Class|general induction]]. For all $x \in N$, let $\map P x$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :Every [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $N$ which is [[Definition:Set Bounded by Set|bounded]] by $x$ h...
Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Subset_of_Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_has_Greatest_Element/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element", "Minim...
[ "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Bounded Class/Bounded by Set", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Smallest Set by ...
proofwiki-16931
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping
Statement of Conditions: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest}} === Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressin...
Let $\RR$ be the relation on $N$ defined as: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map \RR {x, y} \iff \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ We are given that $g$ is a progressing mapping. From the Progressing Function Lemma, we have that: {{begin-axiom}} {{axiom | n = 1 | q = \forall y \in \Dom g | ml= \map \RR {y...
[[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement|Statement of Conditions]]: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]] === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induce...
Let $\RR$ be the [[Definition:Relation (Class Theory)|relation]] on $N$ defined as: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map \RR {x, y} \iff \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ We are given that $g$ is a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]]. From the [[Progressing Function Lemma]], we have that: {{begin-a...
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_induces_Nest/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element", "Minim...
[ "Definition:Relation/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Progressing Function Lemma", "Double Induction Principle/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Relation/Class Theory", "Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping", "Rule of Addition", "Double Induction Pri...
proofwiki-16932
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping
Statement of Conditions: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest}} === Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressin...
According to hypothesis, let $M$ be a minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$. By Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ By Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element: :if $x$ is a fixed p...
[[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement|Statement of Conditions]]: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]] === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induce...
According to hypothesis, let $M$ be a [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed]] under $g$ with respect to $b$. By [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]]: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ By [[Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed C...
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_is_Well-Ordered/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element", "Minim...
[ "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Closed Class under Progressing Mappi...
proofwiki-16933
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping
Statement of Conditions: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest}} === Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressin...
{{AimForCont}} $b$ is not the smallest element of $N$. Then there exists $m \in N$ such that $b \nsubseteq m$. In particular: :$m \ne b$ Let $B$ be the subclass of $A$ defined as: :$B = \set {x \in A: \paren {x = b} \lor \paren {\exists y \in B: x = \map g y} }$ This is a subclass of $A$ containing $b$ which is closed ...
[[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement|Statement of Conditions]]: {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement}} Then the following results hold: === [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]] === {{:Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induce...
{{AimForCont}} $b$ is not the [[Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion (Class Theory)|smallest element]] of $N$. Then there exists $m \in N$ such that $b \nsubseteq m$. In particular: :$m \ne b$ Let $B$ be the [[Definition:Subclass|subclass]] of $A$ defined as: :$B = \set {x \in A: \paren {x = b} \lor \paren {\ex...
Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Element_of_Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes", "Progressing Mappings", "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Statement", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element", "Minim...
[ "Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Proper Subclass", "Definition:Closed under Mappi...
proofwiki-16934
Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element
Every bounded subset of $N$ has a greatest element.
Let the hypothesis be assumed. The proof proceeds by general induction. For all $x \in N$, let $\map P x$ be the proposition: :Every subset of $N$ which is bounded by $x$ has a greatest element. === Basis for the Induction === Let $x = b$. From Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping, $b$ i...
Every [[Definition:Bounded Subset of Class|bounded subset]] of $N$ has a [[Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion (Class Theory)|greatest element]].
Let the hypothesis be assumed. The proof proceeds by [[Principle of General Induction for Minimally Closed Class|general induction]]. For all $x \in N$, let $\map P x$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :Every [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $N$ which is [[Definition:Set Bounded by Set|bounded]] by $x$ h...
Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Subset_of_Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_has_Greatest_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bounded_Subset_of_Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_has_Greatest_Element/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Class/Bounded Subset of Class", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory" ]
[ "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Bounded Class/Bounded by Set", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Smallest Set by ...
proofwiki-16935
Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element
$g$ has no fixed point, unless possibly the greatest element, if there is one.
Suppose $g$ has a fixed point. Let $x$ be an element of $M$ such that $\map g x = x$. We have from Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping that: :$b \subseteq x$ Suppose that $y \subseteq x$. Then by Image of Proper Subset under Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class: :$\map g y \sub...
$g$ has no [[Definition:Fixed Point|fixed point]], unless possibly the [[Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion (Class Theory)|greatest element]], if there is one.
Suppose $g$ has a [[Definition:Fixed Point|fixed point]]. Let $x$ be an [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] of $M$ such that $\map g x = x$. We have from [[Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping]] that: :$b \subseteq x$ Suppose that $y \subseteq x$. Then by [[Image of Proper Subse...
Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Closed_Class_is_Greatest_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fixed_Point_of_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Closed_Class_is_Greatest_Element/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Element/Class", "Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping", "Image of Proper Subset under Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class", "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class" ]
proofwiki-16936
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered
$N$ is well-ordered under the subset relation.
According to hypothesis, let $M$ be a minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$. By Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ By Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element: :if $x$ is a fixed p...
$N$ is [[Definition:Well-Ordered Class under Subset Relation|well-ordered]] under the [[Definition:Subset Relation|subset relation]].
According to hypothesis, let $M$ be a [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed]] under $g$ with respect to $b$. By [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]]: :$\forall x, y \in M: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ By [[Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed C...
Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping is Well-Ordered/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_is_Well-Ordered
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping_is_Well-Ordered/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Well-Ordered Class under Subset Relation", "Definition:Subset Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Fixed Point of Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class is Greatest Element", "Definition:Fixed Point", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Closed Class under Progressing Mappi...
proofwiki-16937
Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping
$b$ is the smallest element of $N$.
{{AimForCont}} $b$ is not the smallest element of $N$. Then there exists $m \in N$ such that $b \nsubseteq m$. In particular: :$m \ne b$ Let $B$ be the subclass of $A$ defined as: :$B = \set {x \in A: \paren {x = b} \lor \paren {\exists y \in B: x = \map g y} }$ This is a subclass of $A$ containing $b$ which is closed ...
$b$ is the [[Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion (Class Theory)|smallest element]] of $N$.
{{AimForCont}} $b$ is not the [[Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion (Class Theory)|smallest element]] of $N$. Then there exists $m \in N$ such that $b \nsubseteq m$. In particular: :$m \ne b$ Let $B$ be the [[Definition:Subclass|subclass]] of $A$ defined as: :$B = \set {x \in A: \paren {x = b} \lor \paren {\ex...
Smallest Element of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Element_of_Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smallest_Element_of_Minimally_Closed_Class_under_Progressing_Mapping/Proof
[ "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion/Class Theory", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Proper Subclass", "Definition:Closed under Mappi...
proofwiki-16938
Equivalence of Definitions of Minimally Closed Class
Let $A$ be a class. Let $g$ be a mapping on $A$. {{TFAE|def = Minimally Closed Class|view = minimally closed class under $g$}}
Let it be given that $A$ is closed under $g$.
Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let $g$ be a [[Definition:Class Mapping|mapping]] on $A$. {{TFAE|def = Minimally Closed Class|view = minimally closed class under $g$}}
Let it be given that $A$ is [[Definition:Closed Class under Mapping|closed under $g$]].
Equivalence of Definitions of Minimally Closed Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Minimally_Closed_Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Minimally_Closed_Class
[ "Minimally Closed Classes" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Mapping/Class Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory" ]
proofwiki-16939
Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class
Let $M$ be a class. Let $g: M \to M$ be a mapping on $M$. Let $b \in M$ such that $M$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$. Let $P: M \to \set {\T, \F}$ be a propositional function on $M$. Suppose that: :$(1): \quad \map P b = \T$ :$(2): \quad \forall x \in M: \map P x = \T \implies \map P {\map g x} = \T$...
We are given that $M$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$. That is, $M$ is closed under $g$ with the extra property that $M$ has no proper class containing $b$ which is also closed under $g$. Let $P$ be a propositional function on $M$ which has the properties specified: :$(1): \quad \map P b = \T$ :$(2): ...
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]]. Let $g: M \to M$ be a [[Definition:Class Mapping|mapping]] on $M$. Let $b \in M$ such that $M$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$]]. Let $P: M \to \set {\T, \F}$ be a [[Definition:Propositional Function|propos...
We are given that $M$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$]]. That is, $M$ is [[Definition:Closed Class under Mapping|closed under $g$]] with the extra property that $M$ has no [[Definition:Proper Class|proper class]] containing $b$ which is also [[Definition:Closed Cla...
Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_General_Induction/Minimally_Closed_Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principle_of_General_Induction/Minimally_Closed_Class
[ "Mathematical Induction", "Proof Techniques", "Principle of General Induction" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Propositional Function" ]
[ "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Class (Class Theory)/Proper Class", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Propositional Function", "Definition:Subclass", "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Element/Class"...
proofwiki-16940
Double Induction Principle/Minimally Closed Class
Let $M$ be a class which is closed under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $b$ be an element of $M$ such that $M$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$. Let $\RR$ be a relation on $M$ which satisfies: {{begin-axiom}} {{axiom | n = \text D_1 | q = \forall x \in M | m = \map \RR {x, b} }} {{axiom...
The proof proceeds by general induction. Let an element $x$ of $M$ be defined as: :'''left normal''' with respect to $\RR$ {{iff}} $\map \RR {x, y}$ for all $y \in M$ :'''right normal''' with respect to $\RR$ {{iff}} $\map \RR {y, x}$ for all $y \in M$. Let the hypothesis be assumed. First we demonstrate a lemma:
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Closed Class under Mapping|closed]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $b$ be an [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] of $M$ such that $M$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $...
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of General Induction for Minimally Closed Class|general induction]]. Let an [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] $x$ of $M$ be defined as: :'''[[Definition:Left Normal Element of Relation|left normal]]''' with respect to $\RR$ {{iff}} $\map \RR {x, y}$ for all $y \in M$ :'''[[Defin...
Double Induction Principle/Minimally Closed Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Induction_Principle/Minimally_Closed_Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Induction_Principle/Minimally_Closed_Class
[ "Double Induction Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Relation/Class Theory" ]
[ "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Left Normal Element of Relation", "Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation", "Definition:Lemma", "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation", ...
proofwiki-16941
Double Induction Principle/Minimally Closed Class/Lemma
Let $x$ be a right normal element of $M$ with respect to $\RR$. Then $x$ is also a left normal element of $M$ with respect to $\RR$.
The proof proceeds by general induction. Let $x \in M$ be right normal with respect to $\RR$ Let $\map P y$ be the proposition: :$\map \RR {x, y}$ holds.
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation|right normal element]] of $M$ with respect to $\RR$. Then $x$ is also a [[Definition:Left Normal Element of Relation|left normal element]] of $M$ with respect to $\RR$.
The proof proceeds by [[Principle of General Induction for Minimally Closed Class|general induction]]. Let $x \in M$ be [[Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation|right normal]] with respect to $\RR$ Let $\map P y$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\map \RR {x, y}$ holds.
Double Induction Principle/Minimally Closed Class/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Induction_Principle/Minimally_Closed_Class/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Double_Induction_Principle/Minimally_Closed_Class/Lemma
[ "Double Induction Principle" ]
[ "Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation", "Definition:Left Normal Element of Relation" ]
[ "Principle of General Induction/Minimally Closed Class", "Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation", "Principle of General Induction", "Definition:Right Normal Element of Relation" ]
proofwiki-16942
Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class
Let $N$ be a class which is closed under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $b$ be an element of $N$ such that $N$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$. Then for all $x, y \in N$: :$x \subseteq y \subseteq \map g x \implies x = y \lor y = \map g x$
From Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest, we have that $N$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the Sandwich Principle applies directly. {{qed}} Category:Sandwich Principle Category:Minimally Closed Classes Category:Progressing Mappings lt38fy...
Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Closed Class under Mapping|closed]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $b$ be an [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] of $N$ such that $N$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $...
From [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]], we have that $N$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the [[Sandwich Principle]] applies directly. {{qed}} [[Category:Sandwich Principle]] [[Category:Minimally ...
Sandwich Principle for Minimally Closed Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle_for_Minimally_Closed_Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sandwich_Principle_for_Minimally_Closed_Class
[ "Sandwich Principle", "Minimally Closed Classes", "Progressing Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class" ]
[ "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory", "Sandwich Principle", "Category:Sandwich Principle", "Category:Minimally Closed Classes", "Category:Progressing Mappings" ]
proofwiki-16943
Image of Proper Subset under Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class
Let $N$ be a class which is closed under a progressing mapping $g$. Let $b$ be an element of $N$ such that $N$ is minimally closed under $g$ with respect to $b$. Then: :$x \subset y \implies \map g x \subseteq y$
From Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest, we have that $N$ is a nest in which: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the corollary 1 of the Sandwich Principle applies directly. {{qed}} Category:Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping nj5p8p3qi74wqw5b8x5...
Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|class]] which is [[Definition:Closed Class under Mapping|closed]] under a [[Definition:Progressing Mapping|progressing mapping]] $g$. Let $b$ be an [[Definition:Element of Class|element]] of $N$ such that $N$ is [[Definition:Minimally Closed Class|minimally closed under $...
From [[Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest]], we have that $N$ is a [[Definition:Nest (Class Theory)|nest]] in which: :$\forall x, y \in N: \map g x \subseteq y \lor y \subseteq x$ Thus the [[Sandwich Principle/Corollary 1|corollary 1 of the Sandwich Principle]] applies directly. {{qed}} [[C...
Image of Proper Subset under Progressing Mapping on Minimally Closed Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Proper_Subset_under_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Closed_Class
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Image_of_Proper_Subset_under_Progressing_Mapping_on_Minimally_Closed_Class
[ "Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Definition:Closed under Mapping/Class Theory", "Definition:Progressing Mapping", "Definition:Element/Class", "Definition:Minimally Closed Class" ]
[ "Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping induces Nest", "Definition:Nest/Class Theory", "Sandwich Principle/Corollary 1", "Category:Minimally Closed Classes under Progressing Mapping" ]
proofwiki-16944
Even Impulse Pair is Fourier Transform of Cosine Function
Consider the (real) cosine function $\map \cos x: \R \to \R$. :$\map f x = \map \cos {\pi x}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\hat f} s | r = \dfrac 1 2 \map \delta {s - \dfrac 1 2} + \dfrac 1 2 \map \delta {s + \dfrac 1 2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map {\operatorname {II} } s | c = }} {{end-eqn}}...
By the definition of a Fourier transform: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\hat f} s | r = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i x s} \map f x \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i x s} \map \cos {\pi x} \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i x s} \dfrac 1 2 \...
Consider the [[Definition:Real Cosine Function|(real) cosine function]] $\map \cos x: \R \to \R$. :$\map f x = \map \cos {\pi x}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\hat f} s | r = \dfrac 1 2 \map \delta {s - \dfrac 1 2} + \dfrac 1 2 \map \delta {s + \dfrac 1 2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map {\operatorna...
By the definition of a [[Definition:Fourier Transform of Real Function|Fourier transform]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\hat f} s | r = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i x s} \map f x \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i x s} \map \cos {\pi x} \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = ...
Even Impulse Pair is Fourier Transform of Cosine Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Even_Impulse_Pair_is_Fourier_Transform_of_Cosine_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Even_Impulse_Pair_is_Fourier_Transform_of_Cosine_Function
[ "Cosine Function", "Even Impulse Pair Function", "Examples of Fourier Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Cosine/Real Function", "Definition:Fourier Transform/Real Function", "Definition:Even Impulse Pair Function" ]
[ "Definition:Fourier Transform/Real Function", "Euler's Cosine Identity", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Definite", "Fourier Transform of 1" ]
proofwiki-16945
Convolution of Real Function with Rectangle Function
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a bounded piecewise continuous real function. Consider the rectangle function $\Pi: \R \to \R$. Then: :$\forall x \in \R: \map \Pi x * \map f x = \ds \int_{x \mathop - \frac 1 2}^{x \mathop + \frac 1 2} \map f u \rd u$ where $*$ denotes the convolution integral.
{{MissingLinks}} By definition of convolution integral: :$\ds \map \Pi x * \map f x = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \map \Pi {x - t} \map f x \rd t$ The above integral exists because $f$ is discontinuous on a countable set (see Lebesgue-Vitali Theorem). This is equal to: :$\ds \int_{-\infty}^{x - \frac 1 2} \map \Pi {x - t} \...
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Real-Valued Function|bounded]] [[Definition:Piecewise Continuous Function/Variant 3|piecewise continuous]] [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. Consider the [[Definition:Rectangle Function|rectangle function]] $\Pi: \R \to \R$. Then: :$\forall x \in \R: \map \Pi x *...
{{MissingLinks}} By definition of [[Definition:Convolution Integral|convolution integral]]: :$\ds \map \Pi x * \map f x = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \map \Pi {x - t} \map f x \rd t$ The above integral exists because $f$ is discontinuous on a countable set (see [[Lebesgue-Vitali Theorem]]). This is equal to: :$\ds \int_{...
Convolution of Real Function with Rectangle Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convolution_of_Real_Function_with_Rectangle_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convolution_of_Real_Function_with_Rectangle_Function
[ "Rectangle Function", "Convolution Integrals" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Mapping/Real-Valued", "Definition:Piecewise Continuous Function/Variant 3", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Rectangle Function", "Definition:Convolution Integral" ]
[ "Definition:Convolution Integral", "Lebesgue-Vitali Theorem", "Definition:Rectangle Function" ]
proofwiki-16946
Repeated Fourier Transform of Even Function
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be an even real function which is Lebesgue integrable. Let $\ds \map \FF {\map f t} = \map F s = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i s t} \map f t \rd t$ be the Fourier transform of $f$. Let $\ds \map \FF {\map F s} = \map g t = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i t s} \map F s \rd s$ be the Fourier tran...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map g t | r = \map f {-t} | c = Repeated Fourier Transform of Real Function }} {{eqn | r = \map f t | c = {{Defof|Even Function}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be an [[Definition:Even Function|even]] [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] which is [[Definition:Lebesgue Integrable Function|Lebesgue integrable]]. Let $\ds \map \FF {\map f t} = \map F s = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i s t} \map f t \rd t$ be the [[Definition:Fourier Transform of Real ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map g t | r = \map f {-t} | c = [[Repeated Fourier Transform of Real Function]] }} {{eqn | r = \map f t | c = {{Defof|Even Function}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Repeated Fourier Transform of Even Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Repeated_Fourier_Transform_of_Even_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Repeated_Fourier_Transform_of_Even_Function
[ "Fourier Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Even Function", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Integrable Function/Lebesgue", "Definition:Fourier Transform/Real Function", "Definition:Fourier Transform/Real Function" ]
[ "Repeated Fourier Transform of Real Function" ]
proofwiki-16947
Repeated Fourier Transform of Odd Function
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be an odd real function which is Lebesgue integrable. Let $\ds \map \FF {\map f t} = \map F s = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i s t} \map f t \rd t$ be the Fourier transform of $f$. Let $\ds \map \FF {\map F s} = \map g t = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i t s} \map F s \rd s$ be the Fourier trans...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map g t | r = \map f {-t} | c = Repeated Fourier Transform of Real Function }} {{eqn | r = -\map f t | c = {{Defof|Odd Function}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be an [[Definition:Odd Function|odd]] [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] which is [[Definition:Lebesgue Integrable Function|Lebesgue integrable]]. Let $\ds \map \FF {\map f t} = \map F s = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i s t} \map f t \rd t$ be the [[Definition:Fourier Transform of Real Fu...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map g t | r = \map f {-t} | c = [[Repeated Fourier Transform of Real Function]] }} {{eqn | r = -\map f t | c = {{Defof|Odd Function}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Repeated Fourier Transform of Odd Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Repeated_Fourier_Transform_of_Odd_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Repeated_Fourier_Transform_of_Odd_Function
[ "Fourier Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Function", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Integrable Function/Lebesgue", "Definition:Fourier Transform/Real Function", "Definition:Fourier Transform/Real Function" ]
[ "Repeated Fourier Transform of Real Function" ]
proofwiki-16948
Fourier's Theorem/Integral Form
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a real function which satisfies the Dirichlet conditions on $\R$. Then: :$\dfrac {\map f {t^+} + \map f {t^-} } 2 = \ds \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{2 \pi i t s} \paren {\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i t s} \map f t \rd t} \rd s$ where: :$\map f {t^+}$ and $\map f {t^-}$ denote the limit from above ...
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Joseph Fourier|cat = Fourier}}
Let $f: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] which satisfies the [[Definition:Dirichlet Conditions|Dirichlet conditions]] on $\R$. Then: :$\dfrac {\map f {t^+} + \map f {t^-} } 2 = \ds \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{2 \pi i t s} \paren {\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i t s} \map f t \rd t} \rd s$ whe...
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Joseph Fourier|cat = Fourier}}
Fourier's Theorem/Integral Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier's_Theorem/Integral_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier's_Theorem/Integral_Form
[ "Fourier Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Dirichlet Conditions", "Definition:Limit of Real Function/Right", "Definition:Limit of Real Function/Left" ]
[]
proofwiki-16949
Fourier's Theorem/Integral Form/Continuous Point
Let $f$ be continuous at $t \in \R$. Then: :$\ds \map f t = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{2 \pi i t s} \paren {\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i t s} \map f t \rd t} \rd s$
At a point of continuity we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac {\map f {t^+} + \map f {t^-} } 2 | r = \dfrac {\map f t + \map f t} 2 | c = as $\map f t = \map f {t^+} = \map f {t^-}$ at a point of continuity }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {2 \map f t} 2 | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map f t | c = }} {{end-...
Let $f$ be [[Definition:Continuous Real Function at Point|continuous]] at $t \in \R$. Then: :$\ds \map f t = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{2 \pi i t s} \paren {\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2 \pi i t s} \map f t \rd t} \rd s$
At a [[Definition:Continuous Real Function at Point|point of continuity]] we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac {\map f {t^+} + \map f {t^-} } 2 | r = \dfrac {\map f t + \map f t} 2 | c = as $\map f t = \map f {t^+} = \map f {t^-}$ at a [[Definition:Continuous Real Function at Point|point of continuity...
Fourier's Theorem/Integral Form/Continuous Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier's_Theorem/Integral_Form/Continuous_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier's_Theorem/Integral_Form/Continuous_Point
[ "Fourier Transforms" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Point" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Point", "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Point", "Fourier's Theorem/Integral Form" ]
proofwiki-16950
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Lemma 1
:$\map {p_i^\to} {\map {\pr_k^\gets} {V_k} \cap Y_i}$ is open in $\struct{X_i, \tau_i}$
We have that $p_i$ is a bijection from the lemmas: :$p_i$ is an injection :$p_i$ is a surjection Let $x \in X_i$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = \map {p_i^\to} {\map {\pr_k^\gets} {V_k} \cap Y_i} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \map {p_i^{-1} } x | o = \in | r = \...
:$\map {p_i^\to} {\map {\pr_k^\gets} {V_k} \cap Y_i}$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $\struct{X_i, \tau_i}$
We have that $p_i$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]] from the [[Definition:Lemma|lemmas]]: :[[Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Injection|$p_i$ is an injection]] :[[Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Surjection|$p_i$ is a surjection]] Let $x \in X...
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Lemma_1
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lemma", "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Injection", "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Surjection" ]
proofwiki-16951
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Injection
Let $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a family of sets where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $\ds X = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} X_i$ be the Cartesian product of $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $z \in X$. Let $i \in I$. Let $Y_i = \set {x \in X: \forall j \in I \setminus \set i: x_j = z_j}$. Let $p_i = \pr_i...
Let $x, y \in Y_i$. Then for all $j \in I \setminus \set i$: :$x_j = z_j = y_j$ Let $\map {p_i} x = \map {p_i} y$. Then: :$x_i = y_i$ Thus: :$x = y$ It follows that $p_i$ is an injection by definition.
Let $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Indexed Family|family]] of [[Definition:Set|sets]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $\ds X = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} X_i$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product of Family|Cartesian product]] of $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$....
Let $x, y \in Y_i$. Then for all $j \in I \setminus \set i$: :$x_j = z_j = y_j$ Let $\map {p_i} x = \map {p_i} y$. Then: :$x_i = y_i$ Thus: :$x = y$ It follows that $p_i$ is an [[Definition:Injection|injection]] by definition.
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Injection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Injection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Injection
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Family of Sets", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Injection" ]
[ "Definition:Injection" ]
proofwiki-16952
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Surjection
Let $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a family of sets where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $\ds X = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} X_i$ be the Cartesian product of $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $z \in X$. Let $i \in I$. Let $Y_i = \set {x \in X: \forall j \in I \setminus \set i: x_j = z_j}$. Let $p_i = \pr_i...
Let $x \in X_i$. Let $y \in Y_i$ be defined by: :<nowiki>$\forall j \in I: y_j = \begin{cases} z_j & j \ne i \\ x & j = i \end{cases}$</nowiki> Then: :$\map {p_i} y = y_i = x$ It follows that $p_i$ is a surjection by definition.
Let $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Indexed Family|family]] of [[Definition:Set|sets]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $\ds X = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} X_i$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product of Family|Cartesian product]] of $\family {X_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$....
Let $x \in X_i$. Let $y \in Y_i$ be defined by: :<nowiki>$\forall j \in I: y_j = \begin{cases} z_j & j \ne i \\ x & j = i \end{cases}$</nowiki> Then: :$\map {p_i} y = y_i = x$ It follows that $p_i$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]] by definition.
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Surjection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Surjection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Surjection
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Family of Sets", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Surjection" ]
[ "Definition:Surjection" ]
proofwiki-16953
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Continuous Mapping
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a family of topological spaces where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $\ds \struct {X, \tau} = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be the product space of $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $z \in X$. Let $i \in I$. Let $Y_...
Let $V \in \tau_i$. Let $\ds U = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} U_i$ where: :$U_j = \begin{cases} X_j & j \ne i \\ V & j = i \end{cases}$ From Natural Basis of Product Topology, $U$ is an element of the the natural basis. By definition of the product topology $\tau$ on the product space $\struct {X, \tau}$ the natural basis i...
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Indexed Family|family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $\ds \struct {X, \tau} = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be the [[Definition:Prod...
Let $V \in \tau_i$. Let $\ds U = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} U_i$ where: :$U_j = \begin{cases} X_j & j \ne i \\ V & j = i \end{cases}$ From [[Natural Basis of Product Topology]], $U$ is an [[Definition:Element|element]] of the the [[Definition:Natural Basis of Product Topology|natural basis]]. By definition of the [[De...
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Continuous Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Continuous_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Continuous_Mapping
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Continuous Mapping" ]
[ "Natural Basis of Product Topology", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Product Topology/Natural Basis", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Product Topology/Natural Basis", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Synthetic Basis", "Definition:Product Topology", "De...
proofwiki-16954
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Open Mapping
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a family of topological spaces where $I$ is an arbitrary index set. Let $\ds \struct {X, \tau} = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be the product space of $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$. Let $z \in X$. Let $i \in I$. Let $Y_...
Let $U \in \upsilon_i$. Let $x \in \map {p_i^\to} U$. Then by definition of the direct image mapping: :$\exists y \in U : x = \map {p_i} y$ By the definition of the subspace topology: :$\exists U' \in \tau: U = U' \cap Y_i$ For all $k \in I$ let $\pr_k$ denote the projection from $X$ to $X_k$. By definition of the natu...
Let $\family {\struct {X_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Indexed Family|family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] where $I$ is an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexing Set|index set]]. Let $\ds \struct {X, \tau} = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} \struct {X_i, \tau_i}$ be the [[Definition:Prod...
Let $U \in \upsilon_i$. Let $x \in \map {p_i^\to} U$. Then by definition of the [[Definition:Direct Image Mapping of Mapping|direct image mapping]]: :$\exists y \in U : x = \map {p_i} y$ By the definition of the [[Definition:Subspace Topology|subspace topology]]: :$\exists U' \in \tau: U = U' \cap Y_i$ For all $k ...
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Proof 2/Open Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Open_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Proof_2/Open_Mapping
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Open Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Direct Image Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Product Topology/Natural Basis", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Direct Image Mapping/Mapping", ...
proofwiki-16955
Exponential Distribution in terms of Continuous Uniform Distribution
Let $X \sim \mathrm U \hointl 0 1$ where $\mathrm U \hointl 0 1$ is the continuous uniform distribution on $\hointl 0 1$. Let $\beta$ be a positive real number. Then: :$-\beta \ln X \sim \Exponential \lambda$ where $\Exponential \cdot$ is the exponential distribution.
Let $Y \sim \Exponential \lambda$. We aim to show that: :$\map \Pr {Y < -\beta \ln x} = \map \Pr {X > x}$ for all $x \in \hointl 0 1$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \Pr {Y < -\beta \ln x} | r = \frac 1 \beta \int_0^{-\beta \ln x} \map \exp {-\frac u \beta} \rd u | c = {{Defof|Exponential Distribution}} }} {...
Let $X \sim \mathrm U \hointl 0 1$ where $\mathrm U \hointl 0 1$ is the [[Definition:Continuous Uniform Distribution|continuous uniform distribution]] on $\hointl 0 1$. Let $\beta$ be a [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive real number]]. Then: :$-\beta \ln X \sim \Exponential \lambda$ where $\Exponential \c...
Let $Y \sim \Exponential \lambda$. We aim to show that: :$\map \Pr {Y < -\beta \ln x} = \map \Pr {X > x}$ for all $x \in \hointl 0 1$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \Pr {Y < -\beta \ln x} | r = \frac 1 \beta \int_0^{-\beta \ln x} \map \exp {-\frac u \beta} \rd u | c = {{Defof|Exponential Distribution}}...
Exponential Distribution in terms of Continuous Uniform Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Distribution_in_terms_of_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Distribution_in_terms_of_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution
[ "Exponential Distribution", "Continuous Uniform Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Continuous", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Exponential Distribution" ]
[ "Primitive of Exponential of a x", "Exponential of Zero", "Primitive of Constant", "Category:Exponential Distribution", "Category:Continuous Uniform Distribution" ]
proofwiki-16956
Power of Random Variable with Continuous Uniform Distribution has Beta Distribution
Let $X \sim \ContinuousUniform 0 1$ where $\ContinuousUniform 0 1$ is the continuous uniform distribution on $\closedint 0 1$. Let $n$ be a positive real number. Then: :$X^n \sim \BetaDist {\dfrac 1 n} 1$ where $\operatorname {Beta}$ is the beta distribution.
Let: :$Y \sim \BetaDist {\dfrac 1 n} 1$ We aim to show that: :$\map \Pr {Y < x^n} = \map \Pr {X < x}$ for all $x \in \closedint 0 1$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \Pr {Y < x^n} | r = \int_0^{x^n} \frac 1 {\map \Beta {\frac 1 n, 1} } u^{\frac 1 n - 1} \paren {1 - u}^{1 - 1} \rd u | c = {{Defof|Beta Distri...
Let $X \sim \ContinuousUniform 0 1$ where $\ContinuousUniform 0 1$ is the [[Definition:Continuous Uniform Distribution|continuous uniform distribution]] on $\closedint 0 1$. Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive real number]]. Then: :$X^n \sim \BetaDist {\dfrac 1 n} 1$ where $\operatorname {Beta...
Let: :$Y \sim \BetaDist {\dfrac 1 n} 1$ We aim to show that: :$\map \Pr {Y < x^n} = \map \Pr {X < x}$ for all $x \in \closedint 0 1$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \Pr {Y < x^n} | r = \int_0^{x^n} \frac 1 {\map \Beta {\frac 1 n, 1} } u^{\frac 1 n - 1} \paren {1 - u}^{1 - 1} \rd u | c = {{Defof|Beta ...
Power of Random Variable with Continuous Uniform Distribution has Beta Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Random_Variable_with_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution_has_Beta_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Random_Variable_with_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution_has_Beta_Distribution
[ "Continuous Uniform Distribution", "Beta Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Continuous", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Beta Distribution" ]
[ "Primitive of Power", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Primitive of Constant", "Category:Continuous Uniform Distribution", "Category:Beta Distribution" ]
proofwiki-16957
Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative
Let $X$ be a random variable. Let $\map \Pr {X \ge 0} = 1$. Then: :$\expect X \ge 0$ where $\expect X$ denotes the expectation of $X$.
=== Discrete Random Variable === {{:Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative/Discrete}}
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]]. Let $\map \Pr {X \ge 0} = 1$. Then: :$\expect X \ge 0$ where $\expect X$ denotes the [[Definition:Expectation|expectation]] of $X$.
=== [[Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative/Discrete|Discrete Random Variable]] === {{:Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative/Discrete}}
Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Non-Negative_Random_Variable_is_Non-Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Non-Negative_Random_Variable_is_Non-Negative
[ "Expectation", "Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Expectation" ]
[ "Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative/Discrete" ]
proofwiki-16958
Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative/Discrete
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable. Let $\map \Pr {X \ge 0} = 1$. Then: :$\expect X \ge 0$ where $\expect X$ denotes the expectation of $X$.
Let $\map \supp X$ be the support of $X$. Note that since $X$ is discrete, its sample space and hence support is countable. Therefore, there exists some sequence $\sequence {x_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ such that: :$\map \supp X = \set {x_i \mid i \in I}$ for some $I \subseteq \N$. By the definition of a sample space, w...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]]. Let $\map \Pr {X \ge 0} = 1$. Then: :$\expect X \ge 0$ where $\expect X$ denotes the [[Definition:Expectation of Discrete Random Variable|expectation]] of $X$.
Let $\map \supp X$ be the [[Definition:Support of Random Variable/Discrete|support]] of $X$. Note that since $X$ is [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete]], its [[Definition:Sample Space|sample space]] and hence support is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]]. Therefore, there exists some [[Definition:Se...
Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative/Discrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Non-Negative_Random_Variable_is_Non-Negative/Discrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Non-Negative_Random_Variable_is_Non-Negative/Discrete
[ "Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Expectation/Discrete" ]
[ "Definition:Support of Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Sample Space", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Sample Space", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Expectation/Discrete" ]
proofwiki-16959
Expectation of Almost Surely Constant Random Variable
Let $X$ be an almost surely constant random variable. That is, there exists some $c \in \R$ such that: :$\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$ Then: :$\expect X = c$
Note that since $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$, we have $\map \Pr {X \ne c} = 0$ from Probability of Event not Occurring. Therefore: :$\map {\mathrm {supp} } X = \set c$ {{MissingLinks|supp}} We therefore have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \expect X | r = \sum_{x \mathop \in \map {\mathrm {supp} } X} x \map \Pr {X = x} | c = {...
Let $X$ be an [[Definition:Almost Surely Constant Random Variable|almost surely constant random variable]]. That is, there exists some $c \in \R$ such that: :$\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$ Then: :$\expect X = c$
Note that since $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$, we have $\map \Pr {X \ne c} = 0$ from [[Probability of Event not Occurring]]. Therefore: :$\map {\mathrm {supp} } X = \set c$ {{MissingLinks|supp}} We therefore have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \expect X | r = \sum_{x \mathop \in \map {\mathrm {supp} } X} x \map \Pr {X = x}...
Expectation of Almost Surely Constant Random Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Almost_Surely_Constant_Random_Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Almost_Surely_Constant_Random_Variable
[ "Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Almost Surely Constant Random Variable" ]
[ "Probability of Event not Occurring", "Category:Expectation" ]
proofwiki-16960
Expectation Preserves Inequality
Let $X$, $Y$ be random variables. Let $\map \Pr {X \ge Y} = 1$. Then: :$\expect X \ge \expect Y$
Note that we have: :$\map \Pr {X - Y \ge 0} = 1$ From Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative, we then have: :$\expect {X - Y} \ge 0$ From Sum of Expectations of Independent Trials, we have: :$\expect X + \expect {-Y} \ge 0$ From Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable, we have: :...
Let $X$, $Y$ be [[Definition:Random Variable|random variables]]. Let $\map \Pr {X \ge Y} = 1$. Then: :$\expect X \ge \expect Y$
Note that we have: :$\map \Pr {X - Y \ge 0} = 1$ From [[Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative]], we then have: :$\expect {X - Y} \ge 0$ From [[Sum of Expectations of Independent Trials]], we have: :$\expect X + \expect {-Y} \ge 0$ From [[Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Vari...
Expectation Preserves Inequality
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_Preserves_Inequality
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_Preserves_Inequality
[ "Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable" ]
[ "Expectation of Non-Negative Random Variable is Non-Negative", "Sum of Expectations of Independent Trials", "Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable", "Category:Expectation" ]
proofwiki-16961
Random Variable has Zero Variance iff Almost Surely Constant
Let $X$ be a random variable such that $\expect {X^2}$ exists. Then $\var X = 0$ {{iff}} there exists $c \in \R$ with $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$. That is, $X$ is almost surely constant.
=== Sufficient Condition === Suppose that there exists some $c \in \R$ with $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$. From Expectation of Almost Surely Constant Random Variable: :$\expect X = c$ Let $\map \supp X$ be the support of $X$. Since $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$, we have: :$\map \supp X = \set c$ We therefore have: {{begin-eqn}} ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]] such that $\expect {X^2}$ exists. Then $\var X = 0$ {{iff}} there exists $c \in \R$ with $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$. That is, $X$ is [[Definition:Almost Surely Constant Random Variable|almost surely constant]].
=== Sufficient Condition === Suppose that there exists some $c \in \R$ with $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$. From [[Expectation of Almost Surely Constant Random Variable]]: :$\expect X = c$ Let $\map \supp X$ be the [[Definition:Support of Random Variable|support]] of $X$. Since $\map \Pr {X = c} = 1$, we have: :$\map ...
Random Variable has Zero Variance iff Almost Surely Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Random_Variable_has_Zero_Variance_iff_Almost_Surely_Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Random_Variable_has_Zero_Variance_iff_Almost_Surely_Constant
[ "Variance" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Almost Surely Constant Random Variable" ]
[ "Expectation of Almost Surely Constant Random Variable", "Definition:Support of Random Variable", "Variance as Expectation of Square minus Square of Expectation" ]
proofwiki-16962
Covariance of Random Variable with Itself
Let $X$ be a random variable. Then $\cov {X, X} = \var X$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cov {X, X} | r = \expect {\paren {X - \expect X} \paren {X - \expect X} } | c = {{Defof|Covariance}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {\paren {X - \expect X}^2} }} {{eqn | r = \var X | c = {{Defof|Variance}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Covariance Category:Variance ir6l7arixypl4c30xq378...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]]. Then $\cov {X, X} = \var X$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cov {X, X} | r = \expect {\paren {X - \expect X} \paren {X - \expect X} } | c = {{Defof|Covariance}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {\paren {X - \expect X}^2} }} {{eqn | r = \var X | c = {{Defof|Variance}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Covariance]] [[Category:Variance]] ir6l7arixyp...
Covariance of Random Variable with Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Random_Variable_with_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Random_Variable_with_Itself
[ "Covariance", "Variance" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable" ]
[ "Category:Covariance", "Category:Variance" ]
proofwiki-16963
Covariance is Symmetric
Let $X$ and $Y$ be random variables. Suppose the covariance $\cov {X, Y}$ exists. Then $\cov {X, Y} = \cov {Y, X}$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cov {X, Y} | r = \expect {\paren {X - \expect X} \paren {Y - \expect Y} } | c = {{Defof|Covariance}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {\paren {Y - \expect Y} \paren {X - \expect X} } | c = Real Multiplication is Commutative }} {{eqn | r = \cov {Y, X} | c = {{Defof|Covariance}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}...
Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Random Variable|random variables]]. Suppose the [[Definition:Covariance|covariance]] $\cov {X, Y}$ exists. Then $\cov {X, Y} = \cov {Y, X}$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cov {X, Y} | r = \expect {\paren {X - \expect X} \paren {Y - \expect Y} } | c = {{Defof|Covariance}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {\paren {Y - \expect Y} \paren {X - \expect X} } | c = [[Real Multiplication is Commutative]] }} {{eqn | r = \cov {Y, X} | c = {{Defof|Covariance}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{...
Covariance is Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_is_Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_is_Symmetric
[ "Covariance" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Covariance" ]
[ "Real Multiplication is Commutative", "Category:Covariance" ]
proofwiki-16964
Covariance of Linear Combination of Random Variables with Another
Let $X, Y, Z$ be random variables. Let $a, b$ be real numbers. Then: :$\cov {a X + b Y, Z} = a \cov {X, Z} + b \cov {Y, Z}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cov {a X + b Y, Z} | r = \expect {\paren {a X + b Y} Z} - \expect {a X + b Y} \expect Z | c = Covariance as Expectation of Product minus Product of Expectations }} {{eqn | r = a \expect {X Z} + b \expect {Y Z} - \paren {a \expect X + b \expect Y} \expect Z | c = Expectation ...
Let $X, Y, Z$ be [[Definition:Random Variable|random variables]]. Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Then: :$\cov {a X + b Y, Z} = a \cov {X, Z} + b \cov {Y, Z}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cov {a X + b Y, Z} | r = \expect {\paren {a X + b Y} Z} - \expect {a X + b Y} \expect Z | c = [[Covariance as Expectation of Product minus Product of Expectations]] }} {{eqn | r = a \expect {X Z} + b \expect {Y Z} - \paren {a \expect X + b \expect Y} \expect Z | c = [[Expect...
Covariance of Linear Combination of Random Variables with Another
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Linear_Combination_of_Random_Variables_with_Another
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Linear_Combination_of_Random_Variables_with_Another
[ "Covariance" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Real Number" ]
[ "Covariance as Expectation of Product minus Product of Expectations", "Expectation is Linear", "Covariance as Expectation of Product minus Product of Expectations", "Category:Covariance" ]
proofwiki-16965
Covariance of Sums of Random Variables
Let $n$ be a strictly positive integer. Let $\sequence {X_i}_{1 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n}$, $\sequence {Y_j}_{1 \mathop \le j \mathop \le n}$ be sequences of random variables. Then: :$\ds \cov {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i, \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n Y_j} = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \cov {X_i, Y_j}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \cov {X_i, Y_j} | r = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \cov {Y_j, X_i} } | c = Covariance is Symmetric }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \cov {\sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n Y_j, X_i} | c = Covariance of Sums of Random Variables...
Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|strictly positive integer]]. Let $\sequence {X_i}_{1 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n}$, $\sequence {Y_j}_{1 \mathop \le j \mathop \le n}$ be [[Definition:Sequence|sequences]] of [[Definition:Random Variable|random variables]]. Then: :$\ds \cov {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \cov {X_i, Y_j} | r = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \cov {Y_j, X_i} } | c = [[Covariance is Symmetric]] }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \cov {\sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n Y_j, X_i} | c = [[Covariance of Sums of Random Var...
Covariance of Sums of Random Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Sums_of_Random_Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Sums_of_Random_Variables
[ "Covariance", "Covariance of Sums of Random Variables" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Random Variable" ]
[ "Covariance is Symmetric", "Covariance of Sums of Random Variables/Lemma", "Covariance is Symmetric", "Covariance of Sums of Random Variables/Lemma", "Category:Covariance", "Category:Covariance of Sums of Random Variables" ]
proofwiki-16966
Covariance of Sums of Random Variables/Lemma
Let $n$ be a strictly positive integer. Let $\sequence {X_i}_{1 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n}$ be a sequence of random variables. Let $Y$ be a random variable. Then: :$\ds \cov {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i, Y} = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \cov {X_i, Y}$
Proof by induction: For all $n \in \N$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \cov {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i, Y} = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \cov {X_i, Y}$
Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|strictly positive integer]]. Let $\sequence {X_i}_{1 \mathop \le i \mathop \le n}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Random Variable|random variables]]. Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]]. Then: :$\ds \cov {\sum_{i \m...
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]: For all $n \in \N$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\ds \cov {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n X_i, Y} = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \cov {X_i, Y}$
Covariance of Sums of Random Variables/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Sums_of_Random_Variables/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Covariance_of_Sums_of_Random_Variables/Lemma
[ "Covariance", "Covariance of Sums of Random Variables" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Random Variable" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-16967
Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable
Let $X$ be a random variable. Let $a, b$ be real numbers. Let $\expect X$ denote the expectation of $X$. Then we have: :$\expect {a X + b} = a \expect X + b$ if that expectation exists.
=== Discrete Random Variable === {{:Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Discrete}}
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]]. Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $\expect X$ denote the [[Definition:Expectation|expectation]] of $X$. Then we have: :$\expect {a X + b} = a \expect X + b$ if that [[Definition:Expectation|expectation]] exists.
=== [[Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Discrete|Discrete Random Variable]] === {{:Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Discrete}}
Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable
[ "Expectation", "Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Expectation" ]
[ "Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Discrete" ]
proofwiki-16968
Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Discrete
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable. Let $a, b$ be real numbers. Then we have: :$\expect {a X + b} = a \expect X + b$ where $\expect X$ denotes the expectation of $X$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \expect {a X + b} | r = \sum_{x \mathop \in \Img X} \paren {a x + b} \map \Pr {X = x} | c = Expectation of Function of Discrete Random Variable }} {{eqn | r = a \sum_{x \mathop \in \Img X} x \map \Pr {X = x} + b \sum_{x \mathop \in \Img X} \map \Pr {X = x} }} {{eqn | r = a \expect ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]]. Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Then we have: :$\expect {a X + b} = a \expect X + b$ where $\expect X$ denotes the [[Definition:Expectation of Discrete Random Variable|expectation]] of $X$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \expect {a X + b} | r = \sum_{x \mathop \in \Img X} \paren {a x + b} \map \Pr {X = x} | c = [[Expectation of Function of Discrete Random Variable]] }} {{eqn | r = a \sum_{x \mathop \in \Img X} x \map \Pr {X = x} + b \sum_{x \mathop \in \Img X} \map \Pr {X = x} }} {{eqn | r = a \ex...
Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Discrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable/Discrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable/Discrete
[ "Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Expectation/Discrete" ]
[ "Expectation of Function of Discrete Random Variable" ]
proofwiki-16969
Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Continuous
Let $X$ be a continuous random variable. Let $a, b$ be real numbers. Then we have: :$\expect {a X + b} = a \expect X + b$ where $\expect X$ denotes the expectation of $X$.
Let $\map \supp X$ be the support of $X$. Let $f_X : \map \supp X \to \R$ be the probability density function of $X$. {{questionable|What if the density $f_X$ does not exist?}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \expect {a X + b} | r = \int_{x \mathop \in \map \supp X} \paren {a x + b} \map {f_X} x \rd x | c = Expectat...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Random Variable|continuous random variable]]. Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Then we have: :$\expect {a X + b} = a \expect X + b$ where $\expect X$ denotes the [[Definition:Expectation|expectation]] of $X$.
Let $\map \supp X$ be the [[Definition:Support of Random Variable|support]] of $X$. Let $f_X : \map \supp X \to \R$ be the [[Definition:Probability Density Function|probability density function]] of $X$. {{questionable|What if the density $f_X$ does not exist?}} Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \expect {a X + b} | r...
Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable/Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable/Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable/Continuous
[ "Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Continuous", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Support of Random Variable", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Expectation of Function of Continuous Random Variable", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Definite" ]
proofwiki-16970
Cauchy's Mean Theorem/Proof of Equality Condition
Let $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n \in \R$ be real numbers which are all positive. Let $A_n$ be the arithmetic mean of $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$. Let $G_n$ be the geometric mean of $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$. Then: :$A_n = G_n$ {{iff}}: :$\forall i, j \in \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}: x_i = x_j$ That is, {{iff}} all terms are equal. Then...
=== Necessary Condition === Let: :$\forall i, j \in \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}: x_i = x_j = x$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A_n | r = \dfrac 1 n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 n n x | c = }} {{eqn | r = x | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = G_n | r = \p...
Let $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n \in \R$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] which are all [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive]]. Let $A_n$ be the [[Definition:Arithmetic Mean|arithmetic mean]] of $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$. Let $G_n$ be the [[Definition:Geometric Mean|geometric mean]] of $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$...
=== Necessary Condition === Let: :$\forall i, j \in \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}: x_i = x_j = x$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A_n | r = \dfrac 1 n \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 n n x | c = }} {{eqn | r = x | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = G_n | ...
Cauchy's Mean Theorem/Proof of Equality Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cauchy's_Mean_Theorem/Proof_of_Equality_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cauchy's_Mean_Theorem/Proof_of_Equality_Condition
[ "Cauchy's Mean Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Arithmetic Mean", "Definition:Geometric Mean", "Definition:Term of Sequence" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Forward-Backward Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Cauchy's Mean Theorem/Proof of Equality Condition", "Definition:Induction Step", "Cauchy's Mean Theorem/Proof of Equality Condition",...
proofwiki-16971
Variance of Linear Transformation of Random Variable
Let $X$ be a random variable. Let $a, b$ be real numbers. Then we have: :$\var {a X + b} = a^2 \var X$ where $\var X$ denotes the variance of $X$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \var {a X + b} | r = \expect {\paren {a X + b - \expect {a X + b} }^2} | c = {{Defof|Variance}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {\paren {a X + b - a \expect X - b}^2} | c = Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable }} {{eqn | r = \expect {a^2 \paren {X - \expect X}^2} }} {{eqn...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Random Variable|random variable]]. Let $a, b$ be [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Then we have: :$\var {a X + b} = a^2 \var X$ where $\var X$ denotes the [[Definition:Variance|variance]] of $X$.
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \var {a X + b} | r = \expect {\paren {a X + b - \expect {a X + b} }^2} | c = {{Defof|Variance}} }} {{eqn | r = \expect {\paren {a X + b - a \expect X - b}^2} | c = [[Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable]] }} {{eqn | r = \expect {a^2 \paren {X - \expect X}^2} }} ...
Variance of Linear Transformation of Random Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Variance_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Variance_of_Linear_Transformation_of_Random_Variable
[ "Variance" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Variance" ]
[ "Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable", "Expectation of Linear Transformation of Random Variable", "Category:Variance" ]
proofwiki-16972
Fourier Series/Square Wave
600pxthumbrightSquare Wave and $9$th Approximation Let $\map S x$ be the square wave defined on the real numbers $\R$ as: :$\forall x \in \R: \map S x = \begin {cases} 1 & : x \in \openint 0 l \\ -1 & : x \in \openint {-l} 0 \\ \map S {x + 2 l} & : x < -l \\ \map S {x - 2 l} & : x > +l \end {cases}$ Then its Fourier se...
Let $\map f x$ be the function defined as: :$\forall x \in \openint {-l} l: \begin{cases} -1 & : -l < x < 0 \\ 1 & : 0 < x < l \end {cases}$ By inspection we see that $\map f x$ is an odd function. Hence from Fourier Series for Odd Function over Symmetric Range we can express $f$ by a half-range Fourier sine series: :$...
[[File:Square-wave-Fourier-series.png|600px|thumb|right|Square Wave and $9$th Approximation]] Let $\map S x$ be the [[Definition:Square Wave|square wave]] defined on the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ as: :$\forall x \in \R: \map S x = \begin {cases} 1 & : x \in \openint 0 l \\ -1 & : x \in \openint {-l...
Let $\map f x$ be the [[Definition:Real Function|function]] defined as: :$\forall x \in \openint {-l} l: \begin{cases} -1 & : -l < x < 0 \\ 1 & : 0 < x < l \end {cases}$ By inspection we see that $\map f x$ is an [[Definition:Odd Function|odd function]]. Hence from [[Fourier Series for Odd Function over Symmetric Ra...
Fourier Series/Square Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Square_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Square_Wave
[ "Square Waves", "Fourier Series for Square Wave" ]
[ "File:Square-wave-Fourier-series.png", "Definition:Square Wave", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Fourier Series" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Odd Function", "Fourier Series for Odd Function over Symmetric Range", "Definition:Half-Range Fourier Sine Series", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Primitive of Sine Function/Corollary", "Cosine of Zero is One", "Cosine of Integer Multiple of Pi" ]
proofwiki-16973
Fourier Series/Triangle Wave
600pxthumbrightTriangle Wave and $9$th Approximation <onlyinclude> Let $\map T x$ be the triangle wave defined on the real numbers $\R$ as: :<nowiki>$\forall x \in \R: \map T x = \begin {cases} \size x & : x \in \closedint {-l} l \\ \map T {x + 2 l} & : x < -l \\ \map T {x - 2 l} & : x > +l \end {cases}$</nowiki> where...
Let $\map f x: \openint {-l} l \to \R$ denote the absolute value function on the open interval $\openint {-l} l$: :<nowiki>$\map f x = \size x = \begin{cases} x & : x > 0 \\ 0 & : x = 0 \\ -x & : x < 0 \end{cases}$</nowiki> From Fourier Series for Absolute Value Function over Symmetric Range, $\map f x$ can immediately...
[[File:Triangle-wave-Fourier-series.png|600px|thumb|right|Triangle Wave and $9$th Approximation]] <onlyinclude> Let $\map T x$ be the [[Definition:Triangle Wave|triangle wave]] defined on the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ as: :<nowiki>$\forall x \in \R: \map T x = \begin {cases} \size x & : x \in \close...
Let $\map f x: \openint {-l} l \to \R$ denote the [[Definition:Absolute Value|absolute value function]] on the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval $\openint {-l} l$]]: :<nowiki>$\map f x = \size x = \begin{cases} x & : x > 0 \\ 0 & : x = 0 \\ -x & : x < 0 \end{cases}$</nowiki> From [[Fourier Series for Abso...
Fourier Series/Triangle Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Triangle_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Triangle_Wave
[ "Triangle Waves", "Fourier Series for Triangle Wave" ]
[ "File:Triangle-wave-Fourier-series.png", "Definition:Triangle Wave", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Given", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Absolute Value", "Definition:Fourier Series" ]
[ "Definition:Absolute Value", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Fourier Series/Absolute Value Function over Symmetric Range" ]
proofwiki-16974
Fourier Series/Sawtooth Wave
600pxthumbrightSawtooth Wave and $6$th Approximation Let $\map S x$ be the sawtooth wave defined on the real numbers $\R$ as: :$\forall x \in \R: \map S x = \begin {cases} x & : x \in \openint {-l} l \\ \map S {x + 2 l} & : x < -l \\ \map S {x - 2 l} & : x > +l \end {cases}$ where $l$ is a given real constant. Then its...
Let $\map f x: \openint {-l} l \to \R$ denote the identity function on the open interval $\openint {-l} l$: :$\map f x = x$ From Fourier Series for Identity Function over Symmetric Range, $\map f x$ can immediately be expressed as: :$\ds \map f x \sim \frac {2 l} \pi \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^{n + ...
[[File:Sawtooth-wave-Fourier-series.png|600px|thumb|right|Sawtooth Wave and $6$th Approximation]] Let $\map S x$ be the [[Definition:Sawtooth Wave|sawtooth wave]] defined on the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ as: :$\forall x \in \R: \map S x = \begin {cases} x & : x \in \openint {-l} l \\ \map S {x + 2 ...
Let $\map f x: \openint {-l} l \to \R$ denote the [[Definition:Identity Mapping|identity function]] on the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval $\openint {-l} l$]]: :$\map f x = x$ From [[Fourier Series for Identity Function over Symmetric Range]], $\map f x$ can immediately be expressed as: :$\ds \map f x ...
Fourier Series/Sawtooth Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Sawtooth_Wave
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Sawtooth_Wave
[ "Sawtooth Waves", "Fourier Series for Sawtooth Wave" ]
[ "File:Sawtooth-wave-Fourier-series.png", "Definition:Sawtooth Wave", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Given", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Fourier Series" ]
[ "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Fourier Series/Identity Function over Symmetric Range" ]
proofwiki-16975
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Product with Singleton/Lemma
:$f$ is a bijection.
=== $f$ is an Injection === Let $x, y \in T_1$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | r = \map f y }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | l = \tuple {x, b} | r = \tuple {y, b} | c = Definition of $f$ }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | l = x | r = y | c = Equality of ordered pairs }} {...
:$f$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]].
=== $f$ is an Injection === Let $x, y \in T_1$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | r = \map f y }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | l = \tuple {x, b} | r = \tuple {y, b} | c = Definition of $f$ }} {{eqn | ll = \leadstoandfrom | l = x | r = y | c = [[Definition:Equality|Equali...
Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space/Product with Singleton/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Product_with_Singleton/Lemma
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_of_Product_Space_is_Homeomorphic_to_Factor_Space/Product_with_Singleton/Lemma
[ "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space" ]
[ "Definition:Bijection" ]
[ "Definition:Equals", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Injection" ]
proofwiki-16976
Standard Continuous Uniform Distribution in terms of Exponential Distribution
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent random variables. Let $\beta$ be a strictly positive real number. Let $X$ and $Y$ be random samples from the exponential distribution with parameter $\beta$. Then: :$\dfrac X {X + Y} \sim \operatorname U \openint 0 1$ where $\operatorname U \openint 0 1$ is the uniform distribution on $\...
Note that the support of $\operatorname U \openint 0 1$ is $\openint 0 1$. It is therefore sufficient to show that for $0 < z < 1$: :$\map \Pr {\dfrac X {X + Y} \le z} = z$ Note that if $x, y > 0$ then: :$0 < \dfrac x {x + y} < 1$ Note also that: :$\dfrac x {x + y} \le z$ with $0 < z < 1$ is equivalent to: :$x \le...
Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Independent Random Variables|independent random variables]]. Let $\beta$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|strictly positive real number]]. Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Random Sample (Probability Theory)|random samples]] from the [[Definition:Exponential Distribution|e...
Note that the [[Definition:Support of Random Variable|support]] of $\operatorname U \openint 0 1$ is $\openint 0 1$. It is therefore sufficient to show that for $0 < z < 1$: :$\map \Pr {\dfrac X {X + Y} \le z} = z$ Note that if $x, y > 0$ then: :$0 < \dfrac x {x + y} < 1$ Note also that: :$\dfrac x {x + y} \le...
Standard Continuous Uniform Distribution in terms of Exponential Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Standard_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution_in_terms_of_Exponential_Distribution
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Standard_Continuous_Uniform_Distribution_in_terms_of_Exponential_Distribution
[ "Continuous Uniform Distribution", "Exponential Distribution" ]
[ "Definition:Independent Random Variables", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Random Sample (Probability Theory)", "Definition:Exponential Distribution", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Continuous" ]
[ "Definition:Support of Random Variable", "Definition:Joint Probability Density Function", "Definition:Probability Density Function", "Condition for Independence from Joint Probability Density Function", "Primitive of Exponential of a x", "Exponential of Zero", "Primitive of Exponential of a x", "Expon...
proofwiki-16977
Inverse Image Mapping Induced by Projection
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a family of sets. Let $\ds S = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the Cartesian product of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. For each $j \in I$, let $\pr_j: S \to S_j$ denote the $j$-th projection. For each $j \in I$ let $\pr_j^\gets: \powerset {S_i} \to \powerset S$ denote the in...
Let $j \in I$. Let $T \subseteq S_j$. Let $\family {T_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be the family of sets defined by: :$T_i = \begin {cases} T & : i = j \\ S_i & : i \ne j \end {cases}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\pr_j^\gets} T | r = \set {x \in S: \map {\pr_j} x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Inverse Image Mappin...
Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Indexed Family of Sets|family of sets]]. Let $\ds S = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product of Family|Cartesian product]] of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. For each $j \in I$, let $\pr_j: S \to S_j$ denote the [[Definition:Projec...
Let $j \in I$. Let $T \subseteq S_j$. Let $\family {T_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be the [[Definition:Indexed Family of Sets|family of sets]] defined by: :$T_i = \begin {cases} T & : i = j \\ S_i & : i \ne j \end {cases}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\pr_j^\gets} T | r = \set {x \in S: \map {\pr_j} x \in T}...
Inverse Image Mapping Induced by Projection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_Image_Mapping_Induced_by_Projection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_Image_Mapping_Induced_by_Projection
[ "Projections", "Inverse Image Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Sets", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Family of Sets", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Family of Sets", "Definition:Inverse Image Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Sets", "Category:Projections", "Category:Inverse Image Mappings" ]
proofwiki-16978
Identity Function is Odd Function
Let $I_\R: \R \to \R$ denote the identity function on $\R$. Then $I_\R$ is an odd function.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {I_\R} {-x} | r = -x | c = {{Defof|Identity Function}} }} {{eqn | r = -\map {I_\R} x | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Hence the result by definition of odd function. {{qed}} Category:Identity Mappings Category:Examples of Odd Functions oxam7nnhno8vncvpprywkit3jqbco7m
Let $I_\R: \R \to \R$ denote the [[Definition:Identity Function|identity function]] on $\R$. Then $I_\R$ is an [[Definition:Odd Function|odd function]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {I_\R} {-x} | r = -x | c = {{Defof|Identity Function}} }} {{eqn | r = -\map {I_\R} x | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Hence the result by definition of [[Definition:Odd Function|odd function]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Identity Mappings]] [[Category:Examples of Odd Functions]] oxam7nnh...
Identity Function is Odd Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Function_is_Odd_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Function_is_Odd_Function
[ "Identity Mappings", "Examples of Odd Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Odd Function" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Function", "Category:Identity Mappings", "Category:Examples of Odd Functions" ]
proofwiki-16979
Half-Range Fourier Series/Identity Function/Cosine
The half-range Fourier cosine series for $\map f x$ can be expressed as: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | o = \sim | r = \frac \lambda 2 - \frac {4 \lambda} {\pi^2} \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {2 n + 1}^2} \cos \dfrac {\paren {2 n + 1} \pi x} \lambda | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac \la...
By definition of half-range Fourier cosine series: :$\ds \map f x \sim \frac {a_0} 2 + \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty a_n \cos \dfrac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where for all $n \in \Z_{> 0}$: :$a_n = \ds \frac 2 \lambda \int_0^\lambda \map f x \cos \dfrac {n \pi x} \lambda \rd x$ Thus by definition of $f$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | ...
The [[Definition:Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series|half-range Fourier cosine series]] for $\map f x$ can be expressed as: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | o = \sim | r = \frac \lambda 2 - \frac {4 \lambda} {\pi^2} \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {2 n + 1}^2} \cos \dfrac {\paren {2 n + 1} \pi...
By definition of [[Definition:Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series|half-range Fourier cosine series]]: :$\ds \map f x \sim \frac {a_0} 2 + \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty a_n \cos \dfrac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where for all $n \in \Z_{> 0}$: :$a_n = \ds \frac 2 \lambda \int_0^\lambda \map f x \cos \dfrac {n \pi x} \lambda \rd x...
Half-Range Fourier Series/Identity Function/Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Half-Range_Fourier_Series/Identity_Function/Cosine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Half-Range_Fourier_Series/Identity_Function/Cosine
[ "Half-Range Fourier Series for Identity Function" ]
[ "Definition:Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series" ]
[ "Definition:Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series", "Cosine of Zero is One", "Primitive of Power", "Primitive of x by Cosine of a x", "Sine of Integer Multiple of Pi", "Cosine of Integer Multiple of Pi", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Category:Half-Range Fourier Series for Identity...
proofwiki-16980
Half-Range Fourier Series/Identity Function/Sine
The half-range Fourier sine series for $\map f x$ can be expressed as: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | o = \sim | r = \dfrac {2 \lambda} \pi \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^{n + 1} } n \sin \frac {n \pi x} \lambda | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {2 \lambda} \pi \paren {\sin \dfrac {\p...
By definition of half-range Fourier sine series: :$(1): \quad \map f x \sim \ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty b_n \sin \dfrac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where for all $n \in \Z_{> 0}$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = b_n | r = \frac 2 \lambda \int_0^\lambda \map f x \sin \dfrac {n \pi x} \lambda \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r =...
The [[Definition:Half-Range Fourier Sine Series|half-range Fourier sine series]] for $\map f x$ can be expressed as: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map f x | o = \sim | r = \dfrac {2 \lambda} \pi \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \frac {\paren {-1}^{n + 1} } n \sin \frac {n \pi x} \lambda | c = }} {{eqn | r =...
By definition of [[Definition:Half-Range Fourier Sine Series|half-range Fourier sine series]]: :$(1): \quad \map f x \sim \ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty b_n \sin \dfrac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where for all $n \in \Z_{> 0}$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = b_n | r = \frac 2 \lambda \int_0^\lambda \map f x \sin \dfrac {...
Half-Range Fourier Series/Identity Function/Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Half-Range_Fourier_Series/Identity_Function/Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Half-Range_Fourier_Series/Identity_Function/Sine
[ "Half-Range Fourier Series for Identity Function" ]
[ "Definition:Half-Range Fourier Sine Series" ]
[ "Definition:Half-Range Fourier Sine Series", "Primitive of x by Sine of a x", "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", "Sine of Integer Multiple of Pi", "Cosine of Integer Multiple of Pi", "Category:Half-Range Fourier Series for Identity Function" ]
proofwiki-16981
Absolute Value Function is Even Function
Let $\size {\, \cdot \,} : \R \to \R$ denote the absolute value function on $\R$: Then $\size {\, \cdot \,}$ is an even function.
Recall the definition of the absolute value function: :<nowiki>$\size x = \begin{cases} x & : x > 0 \\ 0 & : x = 0 \\ -x & : x < 0 \end{cases}$</nowiki> Testing the $3$ cases in turn: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = > | r = 0 }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -x | o = < | r = 0 }} {{eqn | ll...
Let $\size {\, \cdot \,} : \R \to \R$ denote the [[Definition:Absolute Value|absolute value function]] on $\R$: Then $\size {\, \cdot \,}$ is an [[Definition:Even Function|even function]].
Recall the definition of the [[Definition:Absolute Value|absolute value function]]: :<nowiki>$\size x = \begin{cases} x & : x > 0 \\ 0 & : x = 0 \\ -x & : x < 0 \end{cases}$</nowiki> Testing the $3$ cases in turn: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = > | r = 0 }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -x | ...
Absolute Value Function is Even Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absolute_Value_Function_is_Even_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absolute_Value_Function_is_Even_Function
[ "Absolute Value Function", "Examples of Even Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Absolute Value", "Definition:Even Function" ]
[ "Definition:Absolute Value", "Definition:Even Function", "Category:Absolute Value Function", "Category:Examples of Even Functions" ]
proofwiki-16982
Fourier Series/Absolute Value Function over Symmetric Range
Let $\lambda \in \R_{>0}$ be a strictly positive real number. Let $\map f x: \openint {-\lambda} \lambda \to \R$ be the absolute value function on the open real interval $\openint {-\lambda} \lambda$: :$\forall x \in \openint {-\lambda} \lambda: \map f x = \size x$ The Fourier series of $f$ over $\openint {-\lambda} \l...
From Absolute Value Function is Even Function, $\map f x$ is an even function. By Fourier Series for Even Function over Symmetric Range, we have: :$\ds \map f x \sim \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty a_n \cos \frac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a_n | r = \frac 2 \lambda \int_0^\pi \map f x \cos \f...
Let $\lambda \in \R_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|strictly positive real number]]. Let $\map f x: \openint {-\lambda} \lambda \to \R$ be the [[Definition:Absolute Value|absolute value function]] on the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open real interval]] $\openint {-\lambda} \lambda$: :$\forall...
From [[Absolute Value Function is Even Function]], $\map f x$ is an [[Definition:Even Function|even function]]. By [[Fourier Series for Even Function over Symmetric Range]], we have: :$\ds \map f x \sim \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty a_n \cos \frac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a_n | r = \f...
Fourier Series/Absolute Value Function over Symmetric Range
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Absolute_Value_Function_over_Symmetric_Range
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fourier_Series/Absolute_Value_Function_over_Symmetric_Range
[ "Absolute Value Function", "Fourier Series for Absolute Value Function" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Absolute Value", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Fourier Series" ]
[ "Absolute Value Function is Even Function", "Definition:Even Function", "Fourier Series for Even Function over Symmetric Range", "Half-Range Fourier Series/Identity Function/Cosine", "Category:Absolute Value Function", "Category:Fourier Series for Absolute Value Function" ]
proofwiki-16983
Versed Sine Function is Even
The versed sine is an even function: :$\forall \theta \in \R: \map \vers {-\theta} = \vers \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \vers {-\theta} | r = 1 - \map \cos {-\theta} | c = {{Defof|Versed Sine}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \cos \theta | c = Cosine Function is Even }} {{eqn | r = \vers \theta | c = {{Defof|Versed Sine}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Versed Sines Category:Examples of Even Fun...
The [[Definition:Versed Sine|versed sine]] is an [[Definition:Even Function|even function]]: :$\forall \theta \in \R: \map \vers {-\theta} = \vers \theta$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \vers {-\theta} | r = 1 - \map \cos {-\theta} | c = {{Defof|Versed Sine}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 - \cos \theta | c = [[Cosine Function is Even]] }} {{eqn | r = \vers \theta | c = {{Defof|Versed Sine}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Versed Sines]] [[Category:Examples ...
Versed Sine Function is Even
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Versed_Sine_Function_is_Even
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Versed_Sine_Function_is_Even
[ "Versed Sines", "Examples of Even Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Versed Sine", "Definition:Even Function" ]
[ "Cosine Function is Even", "Category:Versed Sines", "Category:Examples of Even Functions" ]
proofwiki-16984
Cartesian Product is Empty iff Factor is Empty/Family of Sets
Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a family of sets indexed by $I$. Let $\ds S = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the Cartesian product of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. Then: :$S = \O$ {{iff}} $S_i = \O$ for some $i \in I$
=== Necessary Condition === By the axiom of choice, the contrapositive statement holds: :if $S_i \ne \O$ for all $i \in I$ then $S \ne \O$ By the Rule of Transposition, the converse holds: :if $S = \O$ then $S_i = \O$ for some $i \in I$ {{qed|lemma}}
Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be a [[Definition:Indexed Family of Sets|family of sets indexed by $I$]]. Let $\ds S = \prod_{i \mathop \in I} S_i$ be the [[Definition:Cartesian Product of Family|Cartesian product]] of $\family {S_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$. T...
=== Necessary Condition === By the [[Axiom:Axiom of Choice|axiom of choice]], the [[Definition:Contrapositive Statement|contrapositive statement]] holds: :if $S_i \ne \O$ for all $i \in I$ then $S \ne \O$ By the [[Rule of Transposition]], the [[Definition:Converse|converse]] holds: :if $S = \O$ then $S_i = \O$ for s...
Cartesian Product is Empty iff Factor is Empty/Family of Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cartesian_Product_is_Empty_iff_Factor_is_Empty/Family_of_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cartesian_Product_is_Empty_iff_Factor_is_Empty/Family_of_Sets
[ "Cartesian Product", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family of Sets", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Family of Sets" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiom of Choice", "Definition:Contrapositive Statement", "Rule of Transposition", "Definition:Converse" ]
proofwiki-16985
Derivative of P-Norm wrt P
Let $p \ge 1$ be a real number. Let $\ell^p$ denote the $p$-sequence space. Let $\mathbf x = \sequence {x_n} \in \ell^p$. Let $\norm {\mathbf x}_p$ be a $p$-norm. Suppose, $\norm {\mathbf x}_p \ne 0$. Then: :$\ds \dfrac \d {\d p} \norm {\mathbf x}_p = \frac {\norm {\mathbf x}_p} p \paren { \frac {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\...
We begin with the natural logarithm of $\norm {\mathbf x}_p$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac \d {\d p} \map \ln {\norm {\bf x}_p} | r = \frac {\dfrac \d {\d p} \norm {\bf x}_p} {\norm {\bf x}_p} }} {{eqn | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d p} } {\frac 1 p \map \ln {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \size {x_n}^p} } }} {{eqn | ...
Let $p \ge 1$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $\ell^p$ denote the [[Definition:P-Sequence Space|$p$-sequence space]]. Let $\mathbf x = \sequence {x_n} \in \ell^p$. Let $\norm {\mathbf x}_p$ be a [[Definition:P-Norm|$p$-norm]]. Suppose, $\norm {\mathbf x}_p \ne 0$. Then: :$\ds \dfrac \d {\d p} \n...
We begin with the [[Definition:Natural Logarithm|natural logarithm]] of $\norm {\mathbf x}_p$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \dfrac \d {\d p} \map \ln {\norm {\bf x}_p} | r = \frac {\dfrac \d {\d p} \norm {\bf x}_p} {\norm {\bf x}_p} }} {{eqn | r = \map {\dfrac \d {\d p} } {\frac 1 p \map \ln {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\...
Derivative of P-Norm wrt P
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_P-Norm_wrt_P
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_P-Norm_wrt_P
[ "P-Norms" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:P-Sequence Space", "Definition:P-Norm" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Logarithm", "Derivative of General Exponential Function", "Definition:Multiplication/Real Numbers", "Definition:Proof", "Category:P-Norms" ]
proofwiki-16986
P-Norm of Real Sequence is Strictly Decreasing Function of P
Let $p \ge 1$ be a real number. Let ${\ell^p}_\R$ denote the real $p$-sequence space. Let $\mathbf x = \sequence {x_n} \in {\ell^p}_\R$. Suppose $\mathbf x$ is not a sequence of zero elements. Let $\norm {\mathbf x}_p$ denote the $p$-norm of $\mathbf x$ where $p \ge 1$. Then the mapping $p \to \norm {\mathbf x}_p$ is s...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall i \in \N | l = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty {\size {x_n} } | o = \ge | r = \size {x_i} | c = {{EuclidCommonNotionLink|5}}: the whole is greater than the part }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \forall i \in \N | l = \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty {\s...
Let $p \ge 1$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let ${\ell^p}_\R$ denote the [[Definition:Real P-Sequence Space|real $p$-sequence space]]. Let $\mathbf x = \sequence {x_n} \in {\ell^p}_\R$. Suppose $\mathbf x$ is not a [[Definition:Real Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Zero (Number)|zero]] [[Definition...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall i \in \N | l = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty {\size {x_n} } | o = \ge | r = \size {x_i} | c = {{EuclidCommonNotionLink|5}}: the whole is greater than the part }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \forall i \in \N | l = \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty {\s...
P-Norm of Real Sequence is Strictly Decreasing Function of P
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/P-Norm_of_Real_Sequence_is_Strictly_Decreasing_Function_of_P
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/P-Norm_of_Real_Sequence_is_Strictly_Decreasing_Function_of_P
[ "P-Norms" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:P-Sequence Space/Real", "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:P-Norm/Real", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Strictly Decreasing" ]
[ "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Real Sequence", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Multiplication/Real Numbers", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Inequality", "Derivative of P-Norm wrt P", "Definition:Term of...
proofwiki-16987
Extension of Half-Range Fourier Sine Function to Symmetric Range
Let $\map f x$ be a real function defined on the interval $\openint 0 \lambda$. Let $\map f x$ be represented by the half-range Fourier sine series $\map S x$: :$\map f x \sim \map S x = \ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty b_n \sin \frac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where for all $n \in \Z_{> 0}$: :$b_n = \ds \frac 2 \lambda \int_0^...
It is apparent by inspection that: :$(1): \quad g$ is an extension of $f$ :$(2): \quad g$ is an odd function. Let $\map T x$ be the Fourier series representing $g$: :$\map g x \sim \map T x = \dfrac {a_0} 2 + \ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {a_n \cos \frac {n \pi x} \lambda + b_n \sin \frac {n \pi x} \lambda}$ w...
Let $\map f x$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] defined on the [[Definition:Real Interval|interval]] $\openint 0 \lambda$. Let $\map f x$ be represented by the [[Definition:Half-Range Fourier Sine Series|half-range Fourier sine series]] $\map S x$: :$\map f x \sim \map S x = \ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\i...
It is apparent by inspection that: :$(1): \quad g$ is an [[Definition:Extension of Mapping|extension]] of $f$ :$(2): \quad g$ is an [[Definition:Odd Function|odd function]]. Let $\map T x$ be the [[Definition:Fourier Series|Fourier series]] representing $g$: :$\map g x \sim \map T x = \dfrac {a_0} 2 + \ds \sum_{n \m...
Extension of Half-Range Fourier Sine Function to Symmetric Range
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Half-Range_Fourier_Sine_Function_to_Symmetric_Range
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Half-Range_Fourier_Sine_Function_to_Symmetric_Range
[ "Half-Range Fourier Series" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Half-Range Fourier Sine Series", "Definition:Extension of Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Odd Function", "Definition:Fourier Series", "Fourier Cosine Coefficients for Odd Function over Symmetric Range", "Fourier Sine Coefficients for Odd Function over Symmetric Range", "Category:Half-Range Fourier Series" ]
proofwiki-16988
Extension of Half-Range Fourier Cosine Function to Symmetric Range
Let $\map f x$ be a real function defined on the interval $\openint 0 \lambda$. Let $\map f x$ be represented by the half-range Fourier cosine series $\map S x$: :$\map f x \sim \map S x = \dfrac {a_0} 2 + \ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty a_n \cos \frac {n \pi x} \lambda$ where for all $n \in \Z_{> 0}$: :$a_n = \ds \fra...
It is apparent by inspection that: :$(1): \quad g$ is an extension of $f$ :$(2): \quad g$ is an even function. Let $\map T x$ be the Fourier series representing $g$: :$\map g x \sim \map T x = \dfrac {a_0} 2 + \ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {a_n \cos \frac {n \pi x} \lambda + b_n \sin \frac {n \pi x} \lambda}$ ...
Let $\map f x$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] defined on the [[Definition:Real Interval|interval]] $\openint 0 \lambda$. Let $\map f x$ be represented by the [[Definition:Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series|half-range Fourier cosine series]] $\map S x$: :$\map f x \sim \map S x = \dfrac {a_0} 2 + \ds \s...
It is apparent by inspection that: :$(1): \quad g$ is an [[Definition:Extension of Mapping|extension]] of $f$ :$(2): \quad g$ is an [[Definition:Even Function|even function]]. Let $\map T x$ be the [[Definition:Fourier Series|Fourier series]] representing $g$: :$\map g x \sim \map T x = \dfrac {a_0} 2 + \ds \sum_{n ...
Extension of Half-Range Fourier Cosine Function to Symmetric Range
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Half-Range_Fourier_Cosine_Function_to_Symmetric_Range
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Extension_of_Half-Range_Fourier_Cosine_Function_to_Symmetric_Range
[ "Half-Range Fourier Series" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series", "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Even Function" ]
[ "Definition:Extension of Mapping", "Definition:Even Function", "Definition:Fourier Series", "Fourier Sine Coefficients for Even Function over Symmetric Range", "Fourier Cosine Coefficients for Even Function over Symmetric Range", "Category:Half-Range Fourier Series" ]
proofwiki-16989
Primitive of x by Logarithm of x squared plus a squared
:$\ds \int x \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} \rd x = \frac {\paren {x^2 + a^2} \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} - x^2} 2 + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int x \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} \rd x | r = \frac {x^2 \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} } 2 - \int \frac {x^3} {x^2 + a^2} \rd x + C | c = Primitive of $x^m \map \ln {x^2 + a^2}$ with $m = 1$ }} {{eqn | r = \frac {x^2 \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} } 2 - \paren {\frac {x^2} 2 - \frac {a^2} 2 \map \ln {x^2 +...
:$\ds \int x \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} \rd x = \frac {\paren {x^2 + a^2} \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} - x^2} 2 + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int x \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} \rd x | r = \frac {x^2 \map \ln {x^2 + a^2} } 2 - \int \frac {x^3} {x^2 + a^2} \rd x + C | c = [[Primitive of Power of x by Logarithm of x squared plus a squared|Primitive of $x^m \map \ln {x^2 + a^2}$]] with $m = 1$ }} {{eqn | r = \frac {x^2 \map \ln {x...
Primitive of x by Logarithm of x squared plus a squared/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_x_by_Logarithm_of_x_squared_plus_a_squared
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_x_by_Logarithm_of_x_squared_plus_a_squared/Proof_1
[ "Primitives involving Logarithm Function", "Primitives involving x squared plus a squared", "Primitive of x by Logarithm of x squared plus a squared" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Power of x by Logarithm of x squared plus a squared", "Primitive of x cubed over x squared plus a squared" ]
proofwiki-16990
Equivalence of Definitions of Sets Separated by Neighborhoods
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. {{TFAE|def = Separated by Neighborhoods/Sets|view = Sets Separated by Neighborhoods}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Let $A, B \subseteq S$ such that: :$\exists N_A, N_B \subseteq S: \exists U, V \in \tau: A \subseteq U \subseteq N_A, B \subseteq V \subseteq N_B: N_A \cap N_B = \O$ From Subsets of Disjoint Sets are Disjoint then: :$U \cap V = \O$ Thus: :$\exists U, V \in \tau: A \subseteq U, ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. {{TFAE|def = Separated by Neighborhoods/Sets|view = Sets Separated by Neighborhoods}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Let $A, B \subseteq S$ such that: :$\exists N_A, N_B \subseteq S: \exists U, V \in \tau: A \subseteq U \subseteq N_A, B \subseteq V \subseteq N_B: N_A \cap N_B = \O$ From [[Subsets of Disjoint Sets are Disjoint]] then: :$U \cap V = \O$ Thus: :$\exists U, V \in \tau: A \subse...
Equivalence of Definitions of Sets Separated by Neighborhoods
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Sets_Separated_by_Neighborhoods
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Sets_Separated_by_Neighborhoods
[ "Separation Axioms" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space" ]
[ "Subsets of Disjoint Sets are Disjoint" ]
proofwiki-16991
Equivalence of Definitions of Points Separated by Neighborhoods
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. {{TFAE|def = Points Separated by Neighborhoods}}
Let $x, y \in S$. From Singleton of Element is Subset: :$x$ and $y$ are separated as points by neighborhoods {{iff}} the singletons $\set x$ and $\set y$ are separated as sets by neighborhoods. From Equivalence of Definitions of Sets Separated by Neighborhoods: :the singletons $\set x$ and $\set y$ are separated as set...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. {{TFAE|def = Points Separated by Neighborhoods}}
Let $x, y \in S$. From [[Singleton of Element is Subset]]: :$x$ and $y$ are [[Definition:Points Separated by Neighborhoods|separated as points by neighborhoods]] {{iff}} the [[Definition:Singleton|singletons]] $\set x$ and $\set y$ are [[Definition:Sets Separated by Neighborhoods|separated as sets by neighborhoods]]....
Equivalence of Definitions of Points Separated by Neighborhoods
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Points_Separated_by_Neighborhoods
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Points_Separated_by_Neighborhoods
[ "Separation Axioms" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space" ]
[ "Singleton of Element is Subset", "Definition:Separated by Neighborhoods/Points", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Separated by Neighborhoods/Sets", "Equivalence of Definitions of Sets Separated by Neighborhoods", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Separated by Neighborhoods/Sets", "Definition:Sin...
proofwiki-16992
Product Space is T3 iff Factor Spaces are T3/Sufficient Condition
Let $\mathbb S = \family {\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha} }_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of non-empty topological spaces for $\alpha$ in some indexing set $I$. Let $\ds T = \struct{S, \tau} = \prod_{\alpha \mathop \in I} \struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}$ be the product space of $\mathbb S$. Let $T$ be a ...
Let $T$ be a $T_3$ space. As $S_\alpha \ne \O$ we also have $S \ne \O$ by the axiom of choice. Let $\alpha \in I$. From Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space, $\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}$ is homeomorphic to a subspace $T_\alpha$ of $T$. From $T_3$ property is hereditary, $T_\alpha$ is $T_3$. Fr...
Let $\mathbb S = \family {\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha} }_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for $\alpha$ in some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\ds T = \struct{S...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:T3 Space|$T_3$ space]]. As $S_\alpha \ne \O$ we also have $S \ne \O$ by the [[Axiom:Axiom of Choice|axiom of choice]]. Let $\alpha \in I$. From [[Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space]], $\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}$ is [[Definition:Homeomorphism (Topological Spaces)...
Product Space is T3 iff Factor Spaces are T3/Sufficient Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_is_T3_iff_Factor_Spaces_are_T3/Sufficient_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_is_T3_iff_Factor_Spaces_are_T3/Sufficient_Condition
[ "Product Space is T3 iff Factor Spaces are T3" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:T3 Space" ]
[ "Definition:T3 Space", "Axiom:Axiom of Choice", "Subspace of Product Space is Homeomorphic to Factor Space", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Subspace", "T3 Property is Hereditary", "T3 Property is Preserved under Homeomorphism", "Definition:T3 Space" ]
proofwiki-16993
Product Space is T3 iff Factor Spaces are T3/Necessary Condition
Let $\mathbb S = \family {\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha} }_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed family of non-empty topological spaces for $\alpha$ in some indexing set $I$. Let $\ds T = \struct {S, \tau} = \ds \prod_{\alpha \mathop \in I} \struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}$ be the product space of $\mathbb S$. For each...
For each $\alpha \in I$, let $\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}$ be a $T_3$ space. Let $U$ be open in $T$ and $x \in U$. From Natural Basis of Product Topology, there exists $\ds U' = \prod_{\alpha \mathop \in I} U'_\alpha$ such that: :for all $\alpha \in I : U_\alpha \in \tau_\alpha$ :$J = \set {\alpha \in I: U_\alpha \...
Let $\mathbb S = \family {\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha} }_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]] for $\alpha$ in some [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]] $I$. Let $\ds T = \struct {...
For each $\alpha \in I$, let $\struct {S_\alpha, \tau_\alpha}$ be a [[Definition:T3 Space|$T_3$ space]]. Let $U$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $T$ and $x \in U$. From [[Natural Basis of Product Topology]], there exists $\ds U' = \prod_{\alpha \mathop \in I} U'_\alpha$ such that: :for all $\alpha \in ...
Product Space is T3 iff Factor Spaces are T3/Necessary Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_is_T3_iff_Factor_Spaces_are_T3/Necessary_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Space_is_T3_iff_Factor_Spaces_are_T3/Necessary_Condition
[ "Product Space is T3 iff Factor Spaces are T3" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Product Space (Topology)", "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:T3 Space" ]
[ "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Natural Basis of Product Topology", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Natural Basis of Product Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Closed Set/To...
proofwiki-16994
Sum from -m to m of Sine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
For $0 < \theta < 2 \pi$: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m \dfrac {\sin \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha} = \int_0^\theta \map \cos {\alpha \theta} \dfrac {\sin \paren {m + \frac 1 2} \theta \rd \theta} {\sin \frac 1 2 \theta}$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i n \theta} e^{i \alpha \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | r = e^{i \alpha \theta} e^{-i m \theta} \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^{2 m} e^{i n \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = e^{i \alp...
For $0 < \theta < 2 \pi$: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m \dfrac {\sin \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha} = \int_0^\theta \map \cos {\alpha \theta} \dfrac {\sin \paren {m + \frac 1 2} \theta \rd \theta} {\sin \frac 1 2 \theta}$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i n \theta} e^{i \alpha \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | r = e^{i \alpha \theta} e^{-i m \theta} \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^{2 m} e^{i n \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = e^{i \al...
Sum from -m to m of Sine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_-m_to_m_of_Sine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_-m_to_m_of_Sine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
[ "Sine Function" ]
[]
[ "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Exponential of Sum", "Euler's Sine Identity", "Euler's Formula", "Primitive of Cosine Function/Corollary", "Sine of Zero is Zero", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Definite" ]
proofwiki-16995
Sum over Integers of Sine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
Let $\alpha \in \R$ be a real number which is specifically not an integer. For $0 < \theta < 2\pi$: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop \in \Z} \dfrac {\map \sin {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha} = \pi$
First we establish the following, as they will be needed later. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \map \sin {\alpha + n} \theta + \map \sin {\alpha - n} \theta | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \map \sin {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \theta + \paren {\alpha - n} \theta} 2} \map \cos {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \theta ...
Let $\alpha \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] which is specifically not an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. For $0 < \theta < 2\pi$: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop \in \Z} \dfrac {\map \sin {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha} = \pi$
First we establish the following, as they will be needed later. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \map \sin {\alpha + n} \theta + \map \sin {\alpha - n} \theta | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \map \sin {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \theta + \paren {\alpha - n} \theta} 2} \map \cos {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \theta...
Sum over Integers of Sine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Integers_of_Sine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Integers_of_Sine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
[ "Sine Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Prosthaphaeresis Formulas/Sine plus Sine", "Prosthaphaeresis Formulas/Sine minus Sine", "Linear Combination of Indexed Summations", "Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cosecant Function/Real Domain", "Zero Derivative implies Constant Function", "Derivative of Sine Function/Corollary", "Cosine of Sum", "Lin...
proofwiki-16996
Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cosecant Function/Real Domain
:$\pi \cosec \pi \alpha = \dfrac 1 \alpha + \ds 2 \sum_{n \mathop \ge 1} \paren {-1}^n \dfrac {\alpha} {\alpha^2 - n^2}$
From Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series for $\cos \alpha x$ over $\openint 0 \pi$: :$\ds \cos \alpha x \sim \frac {2 \alpha \sin \alpha \pi} \pi \paren {\frac 1 {2 \alpha^2} + \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {-1}^n \frac {\cos n x} {\alpha^2 - n^2} }$ Setting $x = 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos 0 | r = \frac...
:$\pi \cosec \pi \alpha = \dfrac 1 \alpha + \ds 2 \sum_{n \mathop \ge 1} \paren {-1}^n \dfrac {\alpha} {\alpha^2 - n^2}$
From [[Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series/Cosine of Non-Integer Multiple of x over 0 to Pi|Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series for $\cos \alpha x$ over $\openint 0 \pi$]]: :$\ds \cos \alpha x \sim \frac {2 \alpha \sin \alpha \pi} \pi \paren {\frac 1 {2 \alpha^2} + \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {-1}^n \frac {\cos n x} ...
Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cosecant Function/Real Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mittag-Leffler_Expansion_for_Cosecant_Function/Real_Domain
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mittag-Leffler_Expansion_for_Cosecant_Function/Real_Domain
[ "Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cosecant Function" ]
[]
[ "Half-Range Fourier Cosine Series/Cosine of Non-Integer Multiple of x over 0 to Pi", "Cosine of Zero is One" ]
proofwiki-16997
Sum from -m to m of 1 minus Cosine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
For $0 < \theta < 2 \pi$: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m \dfrac {1 - \cos \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha} = \int_0^\theta \map \sin {\alpha u} \dfrac {\sin \paren {m + \frac 1 2} u \rd u} {\sin \frac 1 2 u}$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i n \theta} e^{i \alpha \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | r = e^{i \alpha \theta} e^{-i m \theta} \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^{2 m} e^{i n \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = e^{i \alp...
For $0 < \theta < 2 \pi$: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m \dfrac {1 - \cos \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha} = \int_0^\theta \map \sin {\alpha u} \dfrac {\sin \paren {m + \frac 1 2} u \rd u} {\sin \frac 1 2 u}$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = -m}^m e^{i n \theta} e^{i \alpha \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | r = e^{i \alpha \theta} e^{-i m \theta} \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^{2 m} e^{i n \theta} | c = }} {{eqn | n = 1 | r = e^{i \al...
Sum from -m to m of 1 minus Cosine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_-m_to_m_of_1_minus_Cosine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_from_-m_to_m_of_1_minus_Cosine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
[ "Cosine Function" ]
[]
[ "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Exponential of Sum", "Euler's Sine Identity", "Euler's Formula", "Primitive of Sine Function/Corollary", "Cosine of Zero is One", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Definite" ]
proofwiki-16998
Sum over Integers of Cosine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
Let $\alpha \in \R$ be a real number which is specifically not an integer. For $0 \le \theta < 2 \pi$: :$\ds \dfrac 1 \alpha + \sum_{n \mathop \ge 1} \dfrac {2 \alpha} {\alpha^2 - n^2} = \sum_{n \mathop \in \Z} \dfrac {\cos \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha}$
First we establish the following, as they will be needed later. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \cos \paren {\alpha + n} \theta + \cos \paren {\alpha - n} \theta | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \map \cos {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \theta + \paren {\alpha - n} \theta} 2} \map \cos {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \th...
Let $\alpha \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] which is specifically not an [[Definition:Integer|integer]]. For $0 \le \theta < 2 \pi$: :$\ds \dfrac 1 \alpha + \sum_{n \mathop \ge 1} \dfrac {2 \alpha} {\alpha^2 - n^2} = \sum_{n \mathop \in \Z} \dfrac {\cos \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha}$
First we establish the following, as they will be needed later. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \cos \paren {\alpha + n} \theta + \cos \paren {\alpha - n} \theta | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \map \cos {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \theta + \paren {\alpha - n} \theta} 2} \map \cos {\dfrac {\paren {\alpha + n} \t...
Sum over Integers of Cosine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Integers_of_Cosine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_over_Integers_of_Cosine_of_n_+_alpha_of_theta_over_n_+_alpha
[ "Cosine Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer" ]
[ "Prosthaphaeresis Formulas/Cosine plus Cosine", "Prosthaphaeresis Formulas/Cosine minus Cosine", "Linear Combination of Indexed Summations", "Sine of Zero is Zero", "Cosine of Zero is One", "Zero Derivative implies Constant Function", "Derivative of Cosine Function/Corollary", "Sine of Sum", "Linear...
proofwiki-16999
Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Real Cotangent Function
:$\ds \dfrac 1 \alpha + \sum_{n \mathop \ge 1} \dfrac {2 \alpha} {\alpha^2 - n^2} = \pi \cot \pi \alpha$
Corollary of Sum over Integers of $\dfrac {\cos \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha}$ {{ProofWanted|fill in details}} {{qed}}
:$\ds \dfrac 1 \alpha + \sum_{n \mathop \ge 1} \dfrac {2 \alpha} {\alpha^2 - n^2} = \pi \cot \pi \alpha$
Corollary of [[Sum over Integers of Cosine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha|Sum over Integers of $\dfrac {\cos \paren {n + \alpha} \theta} {n + \alpha}$]] {{ProofWanted|fill in details}} {{qed}}
Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Real Cotangent Function/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mittag-Leffler_Expansion_for_Real_Cotangent_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mittag-Leffler_Expansion_for_Real_Cotangent_Function/Proof_2
[ "Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cotangent Function" ]
[]
[ "Sum over Integers of Cosine of n + alpha of theta over n + alpha" ]