id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-200
Cancellation Laws
Let $G$ be a group. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = h g | r = g | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \paren {h g} g^{-1} | r = g g^{-1} | c = {{Group-axiom|2}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = h \paren {g g^{-1} } | r = g g^{-1} | c = {{Group-axiom|1}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = h e | ...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = h g | r = g | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \paren {h g} g^{-1} | r = g g^{-1} | c = {{Group-axiom|2}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = h \paren {g g^{-1} } | r = g g^{-1} | c = {{Group-axiom|1}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = h e | ...
Cancellation Laws/Corollary 2/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws/Corollary_2/Proof_2
[ "Cancellation Laws", "Group Theory", "Cancellability", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Group" ]
[]
proofwiki-201
Cancellation Laws
Let $G$ be a group. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
Let $a, b, c \in G$ and let $a^{-1}$ be the inverse of $a$. Suppose $b a = c a$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {b a} a^{-1} | r = \paren {c a} a^{-1} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = b \paren {a a^{-1} } | r = c \paren {a a^{-1} } | c = {{Defof|Associative Operation}} }} {{eqn...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
Let $a, b, c \in G$ and let $a^{-1}$ be the [[Definition:Inverse Element|inverse]] of $a$. Suppose $b a = c a$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {b a} a^{-1} | r = \paren {c a} a^{-1} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = b \paren {a a^{-1} } | r = c \paren {a a^{-1} } | c = {{Defo...
Cancellation Laws/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws/Proof_1
[ "Cancellation Laws", "Group Theory", "Cancellability", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Group" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Inverse" ]
proofwiki-202
Cancellation Laws
Let $G$ be a group. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
From its definition, a group is a monoid, all of whose elements have inverses and thus are invertible. From Invertible Element of Monoid is Cancellable, it follows that all its elements are therefore cancellable. {{qed}}
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
From its [[Definition:Group|definition]], a group is a [[Definition:Monoid|monoid]], all of whose elements have [[Definition:Inverse Element|inverses]] and thus are [[Definition:Invertible Element|invertible]]. From [[Invertible Element of Monoid is Cancellable]], it follows that all its elements are therefore [[Defin...
Cancellation Laws/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws/Proof_2
[ "Cancellation Laws", "Group Theory", "Cancellability", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Group" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Monoid", "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Inverse", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Invertible Element of Associative Structure is Cancellable/Corollary", "Definition:Cancellable Element" ]
proofwiki-203
Cancellation Laws
Let $G$ be a group. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
Suppose $x = b a = c a$. By Group has Latin Square Property, there exists exactly one $y \in G$ such that $x = y a$. That is, $x = b a = c a \implies b = c$. Similarly, suppose $x = a b = a c$. Again by Group has Latin Square Property, there exists exactly one $y \in G$ such that $x = a y$. That is, $a b = a c \implies...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $a, b, c \in G$. Then the following hold: ;Right cancellation law :$b a = c a \implies b = c$ ;Left cancellation law :$a b = a c \implies b = c$
Suppose $x = b a = c a$. By [[Group has Latin Square Property]], there exists [[Definition:Exactly One|exactly one]] $y \in G$ such that $x = y a$. That is, $x = b a = c a \implies b = c$. Similarly, suppose $x = a b = a c$. Again by [[Group has Latin Square Property]], there exists [[Definition:Exactly One|exactl...
Cancellation Laws/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellation_Laws/Proof_3
[ "Cancellation Laws", "Group Theory", "Cancellability", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Group" ]
[ "Group has Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique", "Group has Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique" ]
proofwiki-204
Center of Group is Normal Subgroup
Let $G$ be a group The center $\map Z G$ of $G$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.
Recall that Center of Group is Abelian Subgroup. Since $g x = x g$ for each $g \in G$ and $x \in \map Z G$: :$g \map Z G = \map Z G g$ Thus: :$\map Z G \lhd G$ {{qed}}
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] The [[Definition:Center of Group|center]] $\map Z G$ of $G$ is a [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $G$.
Recall that [[Center of Group is Abelian Subgroup]]. Since $g x = x g$ for each $g \in G$ and $x \in \map Z G$: :$g \map Z G = \map Z G g$ Thus: :$\map Z G \lhd G$ {{qed}}
Center of Group is Normal Subgroup/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Group_is_Normal_Subgroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Group_is_Normal_Subgroup/Proof_1
[ "Normal Subgroups", "Centers of Groups", "Center of Group is Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Center of Group is Abelian Subgroup" ]
proofwiki-205
Center of Group is Normal Subgroup
Let $G$ be a group The center $\map Z G$ of $G$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.
We have: :$\forall a \in G: x \in \map Z G^a \iff a x a^{-1} = x a a^{-1} = x \in \map Z G$ Therefore: :$\forall a \in G: \map Z G^a = \map Z G$ and $\map Z G$ is a normal subgroup of $G$. {{qed}}
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] The [[Definition:Center of Group|center]] $\map Z G$ of $G$ is a [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $G$.
We have: :$\forall a \in G: x \in \map Z G^a \iff a x a^{-1} = x a a^{-1} = x \in \map Z G$ Therefore: :$\forall a \in G: \map Z G^a = \map Z G$ and $\map Z G$ is a [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $G$. {{qed}}
Center of Group is Normal Subgroup/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Group_is_Normal_Subgroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Group_is_Normal_Subgroup/Proof_2
[ "Normal Subgroups", "Centers of Groups", "Center of Group is Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Center (Abstract Algebra)/Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Subgroup" ]
proofwiki-206
Composition of Relations is Associative
The composition of relations is an associative binary operation: :$\paren {\RR_3 \circ \RR_2} \circ \RR_1 = \RR_3 \circ \paren {\RR_2 \circ \RR_1}$
{{Rewrite|Needs to be rewritten in light of the actual definition of the composition of relations and domain of relations. These equalities may not hold for all relations}} First, note that from the definition of composition of relations, the following must be the case before the above expression is even to be defined:...
The [[Definition:Composition of Relations|composition of relations]] is an [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]] [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operation]]: :$\paren {\RR_3 \circ \RR_2} \circ \RR_1 = \RR_3 \circ \paren {\RR_2 \circ \RR_1}$
{{Rewrite|Needs to be rewritten in light of the actual definition of the composition of relations and domain of relations. These equalities may not hold for all relations}} First, note that from the definition of [[Definition:Composition of Relations|composition of relations]], the following must be the case before th...
Composition of Relations is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composition_of_Relations_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composition_of_Relations_is_Associative
[ "Composite Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Composition of Relations", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Composition of Relations", "Definition:Composition of Relations", "Definition:Domain (Set Theory)/Relation", "Domain of Composite Relation", "Domain of Composite Relation", "Domain of Composite Relation", "Definition:Codomain (Set Theory)/Relation", "Codomain of Composite Relation", "Cod...
proofwiki-207
Intersection of Subsemigroups
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a semigroup. Let $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ be subsemigroups of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then the intersection of $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ is itself a subsemigroup of that $\struct {S, \circ}$.
{{Proofread| check if proof is correct if $\struct {S, \circ}$ is the empty semigroup}} Suppose $\struct {S, \circ}$ is a semigroup where $S$ is the empty set. Suppose $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ are subsemigroups of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then it follows that $T_1$ and $T_2$ are both empty. Sinc...
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]]. Let $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ be [[Definition:Subsemigroup|subsemigroups]] of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ is itself a [[Definit...
{{Proofread| check if proof is correct if $\struct {S, \circ}$ is the empty semigroup}} Suppose $\struct {S, \circ}$ is a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]] where $S$ is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]. Suppose $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ are [[Definition:Subsemigroup|subsemigroups]] of $...
Intersection of Subsemigroups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subsemigroups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subsemigroups
[ "Set Intersection", "Subsemigroups", "Intersection of Subsemigroups" ]
[ "Definition:Semigroup", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Subsemigroup" ]
[ "Definition:Semigroup", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Intersection with Empty Set", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Semigroup is Subsemigroup of Itself", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Se...
proofwiki-208
Intersection of Subsemigroups
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a semigroup. Let $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ be subsemigroups of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then the intersection of $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ is itself a subsemigroup of that $\struct {S, \circ}$.
Let $T = \bigcap \mathbb S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a, b | o = \in | r = T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \forall K \in \mathbb S | l = a, b | o = \in | r = K | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \forall K \in \mathbb S ...
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]]. Let $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ be [[Definition:Subsemigroup|subsemigroups]] of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ is itself a [[Definit...
Let $T = \bigcap \mathbb S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a, b | o = \in | r = T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \forall K \in \mathbb S | l = a, b | o = \in | r = K | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | q = \forall K \in \mathbb S ...
Intersection of Subsemigroups/General Result/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subsemigroups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subsemigroups/General_Result/Proof_1
[ "Set Intersection", "Subsemigroups", "Intersection of Subsemigroups" ]
[ "Definition:Semigroup", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Subsemigroup" ]
[ "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Subsemigroup Closure Test", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Subsemigroup" ]
proofwiki-209
Intersection of Subsemigroups
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a semigroup. Let $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ be subsemigroups of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then the intersection of $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ is itself a subsemigroup of that $\struct {S, \circ}$.
From Set of Subsemigroups forms Complete Lattice: :$\struct {\mathbb S, \subseteq}$ is a complete lattice. where for every set $\mathbb H$ of subsemigroups of $S$: :the infimum of $\mathbb H$ necessarily admitted by $\mathbb H$ is $\ds \bigcap \mathbb H$. Hence the result, by definition of infimum. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]]. Let $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ be [[Definition:Subsemigroup|subsemigroups]] of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of $\struct {T_1, \circ}$ and $\struct {T_2, \circ}$ is itself a [[Definit...
From [[Set of Subsemigroups forms Complete Lattice]]: :$\struct {\mathbb S, \subseteq}$ is a [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattice]]. where for every [[Definition:Set|set]] $\mathbb H$ of [[Definition:Subsemigroup|subsemigroups]] of $S$: :the [[Definition:Infimum of Set|infimum]] of $\mathbb H$ necessarily ad...
Intersection of Subsemigroups/General Result/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subsemigroups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Subsemigroups/General_Result/Proof_2
[ "Set Intersection", "Subsemigroups", "Intersection of Subsemigroups" ]
[ "Definition:Semigroup", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Subsemigroup" ]
[ "Set of Subsemigroups forms Complete Lattice", "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subsemigroup", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Definition:Infimum of Set" ]
proofwiki-210
Cancellable Elements of Semigroup form Subsemigroup
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a semigroup. Let $C$ be the set of cancellable elements of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then $\struct {C, \circ}$ is a subsemigroup of $\struct {S, \circ}$.
Now let $C$ be the set of cancellable elements of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Let $x, y \in C$. Then $x$ and $y$ are both left cancellable and right cancellable. Thus by Left Cancellable Elements of Semigroup form Subsemigroup: :$x \circ y$ is left cancellable and by Right Cancellable Elements of Semigroup form Subsemigroup:...
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]]. Let $C$ be the set of [[Definition:Cancellable Element|cancellable elements]] of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then $\struct {C, \circ}$ is a [[Definition:Subsemigroup|subsemigroup]] of $\struct {S, \circ}$.
Now let $C$ be the set of [[Definition:Cancellable Element|cancellable elements]] of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Let $x, y \in C$. Then $x$ and $y$ are both [[Definition:Left Cancellable Element|left cancellable]] and [[Definition:Right Cancellable Element|right cancellable]]. Thus by [[Left Cancellable Elements of Semig...
Cancellable Elements of Semigroup form Subsemigroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellable_Elements_of_Semigroup_form_Subsemigroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellable_Elements_of_Semigroup_form_Subsemigroup
[ "Subsemigroups", "Cancellability" ]
[ "Definition:Semigroup", "Definition:Cancellable Element", "Definition:Subsemigroup" ]
[ "Definition:Cancellable Element", "Definition:Cancellable Element/Left Cancellable", "Definition:Cancellable Element/Right Cancellable", "Left Cancellable Elements of Semigroup form Subsemigroup", "Definition:Cancellable Element/Left Cancellable", "Right Cancellable Elements of Semigroup form Subsemigroup...
proofwiki-211
Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic
Let $G$ be a cyclic group. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. Then $H$ is cyclic.
Let $G$ be a cyclic group generated by $a$. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. If $H = \set e$, then $H$ is a cyclic group subgroup generated by $e$. Let $H \ne \set e$. By definition of cyclic group, every element of $G$ has the form $a^n$. Then as $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, $a^n \in H$ for some $n \in \Z$. Let $m$ be the s...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$. Then $H$ is [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic]].
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]] [[Definition:Generator of Cyclic Group|generated]] by $a$. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$. If $H = \set e$, then $H$ is a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]] [[Definition:Generated Subgroup|subgroup generated]] by $e$. Let $H \ne \set ...
Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Cyclic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Cyclic/Proof_1
[ "Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic", "Cyclic Groups", "Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Cyclic Group" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Cyclic Group/Generator", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Generated Subgroup", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Sub...
proofwiki-212
Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic
Let $G$ be a cyclic group. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. Then $H$ is cyclic.
Let $G$ be a cyclic group generated by $a$. === Finite Group === Let $G$ be finite. By Bijection from Divisors to Subgroups of Cyclic Group there are exactly as many subgroups of $G$ as divisors of the order of $G$. As each one of these is cyclic by Subgroup of Finite Cyclic Group is Determined by Order, the result fol...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$. Then $H$ is [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic]].
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]] [[Definition:Generator of Cyclic Group|generated]] by $a$. === Finite Group === Let $G$ be [[Definition:Finite Group|finite]]. By [[Bijection from Divisors to Subgroups of Cyclic Group]] there are exactly as many [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroups]] of $G$ as [[Def...
Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Cyclic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Cyclic/Proof_2
[ "Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic", "Cyclic Groups", "Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Cyclic Group" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Cyclic Group/Generator", "Definition:Finite Group", "Bijection from Divisors to Subgroups of Cyclic Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Subgroup of Finite Cyclic Gro...
proofwiki-213
Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic
Let $G$ be a cyclic group. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. Then $H$ is cyclic.
Let $G$ be a cyclic group generated by $a$. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. By Cyclic Group is Abelian, $G$ is abelian. By Subgroup of Abelian Group is Normal, $H$ is normal in $G$. Let $G / H$ be the quotient group of $G$ by $H$. Let $q_H: G \to G / H$ be the quotient epimorphism from $G$ to $G / H$: :$\forall x \in G: ...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$. Then $H$ is [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic]].
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic group]] [[Definition:Generator of Cyclic Group|generated]] by $a$. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $G$. By [[Cyclic Group is Abelian]], $G$ is [[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]]. By [[Subgroup of Abelian Group is Normal]], $H$ is [[Definition:Normal Su...
Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Cyclic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_of_Cyclic_Group_is_Cyclic/Proof_3
[ "Subgroup of Cyclic Group is Cyclic", "Cyclic Groups", "Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Cyclic Group" ]
[ "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Definition:Cyclic Group/Generator", "Definition:Subgroup", "Cyclic Group is Abelian", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Subgroup of Abelian Group is Normal", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Quotient Group", "Definition:Quotient Epimorphism/Group", "Quotient Epimorp...
proofwiki-214
Empty Set is Subset of All Sets
The empty set $\O$ is a subset of every set (including itself). That is: :$\forall S: \O \subseteq S$
By the definition of subset, $\O \subseteq S$ means: :$\forall x: \paren {x \in \O \implies x \in S}$ By the definition of the empty set: :$\forall x: \neg \paren {x \in \O}$ Thus $\O \subseteq S$ is vacuously true. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] $\O$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of every [[Definition:Set|set]] (including itself). That is: :$\forall S: \O \subseteq S$
By the definition of [[Definition:Subset|subset]], $\O \subseteq S$ means: :$\forall x: \paren {x \in \O \implies x \in S}$ By the definition of the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$\forall x: \neg \paren {x \in \O}$ Thus $\O \subseteq S$ is [[Definition:Vacuous Truth|vacuously true]]. {{qed}}
Empty Set is Subset of All Sets/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Subset_of_All_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Subset_of_All_Sets/Proof_1
[ "Subsets", "Empty Set", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Vacuous Truth" ]
proofwiki-215
Empty Set is Subset of All Sets
The empty set $\O$ is a subset of every set (including itself). That is: :$\forall S: \O \subseteq S$
$S \subseteq T$ means: :'''every element of $S$ is also in $T$''' or, equivalently: :'''every element that is ''not'' in $T$ is not in $S$ either.''' Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = S \subseteq T | c = }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \forall x \in S: x \in T | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }...
The [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] $\O$ is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of every [[Definition:Set|set]] (including itself). That is: :$\forall S: \O \subseteq S$
$S \subseteq T$ means: :'''every [[Definition:Element|element]] of $S$ is also in $T$''' or, equivalently: :'''every [[Definition:Element|element]] that is ''not'' in $T$ is not in $S$ either.''' Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = S \subseteq T | c = }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \foral...
Empty Set is Subset of All Sets/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Subset_of_All_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Set_is_Subset_of_All_Sets/Proof_2
[ "Subsets", "Empty Set", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "De Morgan's Laws (Predicate Logic)", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Vacuous Truth", "Definition:Set" ]
proofwiki-216
Relation Reflexivity
Every relation has exactly one of these properties: it is either: :reflexive, :antireflexive or :non-reflexive.
A reflexive relation can not be antireflexive, and vice versa: :$\tuple {x, x} \in \RR \iff \neg \paren {\tuple {x, x} \notin \RR}$ By the definition of non-reflexive, a reflexive relation can not also be non-reflexive. So a reflexive relation is neither antireflexive nor non-reflexive. An antireflexive relation can be...
Every [[Definition:Relation|relation]] has exactly one of these properties: it is either: :[[Definition:Reflexive Relation|reflexive]], :[[Definition:Antireflexive Relation|antireflexive]] or :[[Definition:Non-Reflexive Relation|non-reflexive]].
A [[Definition:Reflexive Relation|reflexive relation]] can not be [[Definition:Antireflexive Relation|antireflexive]], and vice versa: :$\tuple {x, x} \in \RR \iff \neg \paren {\tuple {x, x} \notin \RR}$ By the definition of [[Definition:Non-Reflexive Relation|non-reflexive]], a [[Definition:Reflexive Relation|refle...
Relation Reflexivity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relation_Reflexivity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relation_Reflexivity
[ "Reflexive Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Antireflexive Relation", "Definition:Non-Reflexive Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Antireflexive Relation", "Definition:Non-Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Non-Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Antireflexive Relation", "Definition:Non-Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Anti...
proofwiki-217
Set Union is Idempotent
Set union is idempotent: :$S \cup S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S \cup S | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x \in S | o = \lor | r = x \in S | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = Rule of Idempotence: Disjunction }}...
[[Definition:Set Union|Set union]] is [[Definition:Idempotent Operation|idempotent]]: :$S \cup S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S \cup S | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x \in S | o = \lor | r = x \in S | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = [[Rule of Idempotence/Disjunction|R...
Set Union is Idempotent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Union_is_Idempotent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Union_is_Idempotent
[ "Set Union", "Examples of Idempotence" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Idempotence/Operation" ]
[ "Rule of Idempotence/Disjunction" ]
proofwiki-218
Set Intersection is Idempotent
Set intersection is idempotent: :$S \cap S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S \cap S | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x \in S | o = \land | r = x \in S | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = Rule of Idempotence: Conjunc...
[[Definition:Set Intersection|Set intersection]] is [[Definition:Idempotent Operation|idempotent]]: :$S \cap S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S \cap S | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x \in S | o = \land | r = x \in S | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = [[Rule of Idempotence/Conjun...
Set Intersection is Idempotent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Intersection_is_Idempotent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Intersection_is_Idempotent
[ "Set Intersection", "Examples of Idempotence" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Idempotence/Operation" ]
[ "Rule of Idempotence/Conjunction" ]
proofwiki-219
Set is Subset of Union
The union of two sets is a superset of each: :$S \subseteq S \cup T$ :$T \subseteq S \cup T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \in S | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S \lor x \in T | c = Rule of Addition }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S \cup T | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = S \subseteq S \cup T | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }} {{end-eqn}} Similarly for $T$. ...
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] is a [[Definition:Superset|superset]] of each: :$S \subseteq S \cup T$ :$T \subseteq S \cup T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \in S | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S \lor x \in T | c = [[Rule of Addition]] }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S \cup T | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = S \subseteq S \cup T | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }} {{end-eqn}} Similarly for ...
Set is Subset of Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Union
[ "Set is Subset of Union", "Set Union", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset/Superset" ]
[ "Rule of Addition" ]
proofwiki-220
Set is Subset of Union
The union of two sets is a superset of each: :$S \subseteq S \cup T$ :$T \subseteq S \cup T$
Let $x \in S_\beta$ for some $\beta \in I$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S_\beta | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r = \set {x: \exists \alpha \in I: x \in S_\alpha} | c = {{Defof|Indexed Family of Sets}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l =...
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] is a [[Definition:Superset|superset]] of each: :$S \subseteq S \cup T$ :$T \subseteq S \cup T$
Let $x \in S_\beta$ for some $\beta \in I$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S_\beta | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r = \set {x: \exists \alpha \in I: x \in S_\alpha} | c = {{Defof|Indexed Family of Sets}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l ...
Set is Subset of Union/Family of Sets/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Union/Family_of_Sets/Proof_1
[ "Set is Subset of Union", "Set Union", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset/Superset" ]
[]
proofwiki-221
Set is Subset of Union
The union of two sets is a superset of each: :$S \subseteq S \cup T$ :$T \subseteq S \cup T$
Let $\beta \in I$ be arbitrary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \beta | o = \in | r = I | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \set \beta | o = \subseteq | r = I | c = Singleton of Element is Subset }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \bigcup \set {S_\beta} | o = \subseteq ...
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] is a [[Definition:Superset|superset]] of each: :$S \subseteq S \cup T$ :$T \subseteq S \cup T$
Let $\beta \in I$ be arbitrary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \beta | o = \in | r = I | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \set \beta | o = \subseteq | r = I | c = [[Singleton of Element is Subset]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \bigcup \set {S_\beta} | o = \subs...
Set is Subset of Union/Family of Sets/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Union/Family_of_Sets/Proof_2
[ "Set is Subset of Union", "Set Union", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset/Superset" ]
[ "Singleton of Element is Subset", "Union of Subset of Family is Subset of Union of Family" ]
proofwiki-222
Set is Subset of Itself
Every set is a subset of itself: :$\forall S: S \subseteq S$ Thus, by definition, the relation '''is a subset of''' is reflexive.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x | l = \leftparen {x \in S} | o = \implies | r = \rightparen {x \in S} | c = Law of Identity: | cc= a statement implies itself }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Every [[Definition:Set|set]] is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of itself: :$\forall S: S \subseteq S$ Thus, by definition, the [[Definition:Relation|relation]] '''is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of''' is [[Definition:Reflexive Relation|reflexive]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x | l = \leftparen {x \in S} | o = \implies | r = \rightparen {x \in S} | c = [[Law of Identity]]: | cc= a [[Definition:Statement|statement]] implies itself }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = {{Defof|Subse...
Set is Subset of Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_is_Subset_of_Itself
[ "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Reflexive Relation" ]
[ "Law of Identity", "Definition:Statement" ]
proofwiki-223
Subset of Set with Propositional Function
Let $S$ be a set. Let $P: S \to \set {\T, \F}$ be a propositional function on $S$. Then: :$\set {x \in S: \map P x} \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s | o = \in | r = \set {x \in S: \map P x} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = s | o = \in | r = \set {x \in S \land \map P x} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = s | o = \in | r = \set {x \in S} \land \map P s | c = {{Defof|S...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $P: S \to \set {\T, \F}$ be a [[Definition:Propositional Function|propositional function]] on $S$. Then: :$\set {x \in S: \map P x} \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s | o = \in | r = \set {x \in S: \map P x} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = s | o = \in | r = \set {x \in S \land \map P x} | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = s | o = \in | r = \set {x \in S} \land \map P s | c = {{Defof|S...
Subset of Set with Propositional Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_of_Set_with_Propositional_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_of_Set_with_Propositional_Function
[ "Subsets", "Mapping Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Propositional Function" ]
[ "Rule of Simplification" ]
proofwiki-224
Singleton of Element is Subset
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\set x$ be the singleton of $x$. Then: :$x \in S \iff \set x \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \set x \subseteq A | c = }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \forall y: \paren {y \in \set x \implies y \in A} | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \forall y: \paren {y = x \implies y \in A} | c = {{Defof|Singleton}} }} {{eqn ...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\set x$ be the [[Definition:Singleton|singleton of $x$]]. Then: :$x \in S \iff \set x \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \set x \subseteq A | c = }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \forall y: \paren {y \in \set x \implies y \in A} | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \forall y: \paren {y = x \implies y \in A} | c = {{Defof|Singleton}} }} {{eqn ...
Singleton of Element is Subset/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_of_Element_is_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_of_Element_is_Subset/Proof_1
[ "Subsets", "Singletons", "Singleton of Element is Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Singleton" ]
[ "Equality implies Substitution" ]
proofwiki-225
Singleton of Element is Subset
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\set x$ be the singleton of $x$. Then: :$x \in S \iff \set x \subseteq S$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x \in S$. We have: :$\set x = \set {y \in S: y = x}$ From Subset of Set with Propositional Function: :$\set {x \in S: \map P x} \subseteq S$ Hence: :$\set x \subseteq S$ {{qed|lemma}} === Sufficient Condition === Let $\set x \subseteq S$. From the definition of a subset: :$x \in \set x ...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\set x$ be the [[Definition:Singleton|singleton of $x$]]. Then: :$x \in S \iff \set x \subseteq S$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x \in S$. We have: :$\set x = \set {y \in S: y = x}$ From [[Subset of Set with Propositional Function]]: :$\set {x \in S: \map P x} \subseteq S$ Hence: :$\set x \subseteq S$ {{qed|lemma}} === Sufficient Condition === Let $\set x \subseteq S$. From the definition of a [[Definitio...
Singleton of Element is Subset/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_of_Element_is_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Singleton_of_Element_is_Subset/Proof_2
[ "Subsets", "Singletons", "Singleton of Element is Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Singleton" ]
[ "Subset of Set with Propositional Function", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-226
Subset Relation is Transitive
The subset relation is transitive: :$\paren {R \subseteq S} \land \paren {S \subseteq T} \implies R \subseteq T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \paren {R \subseteq S} \land \paren {S \subseteq T} | c = }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = \paren {x \in R \implies x \in S} \land \paren {x \in S \implies x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = \paren {x \in R \implies x \in T} | c...
The [[Definition:Subset Relation|subset relation]] is [[Definition:Transitive Relation|transitive]]: :$\paren {R \subseteq S} \land \paren {S \subseteq T} \implies R \subseteq T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \paren {R \subseteq S} \land \paren {S \subseteq T} | c = }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = \paren {x \in R \implies x \in S} \land \paren {x \in S \implies x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Subset}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = \paren {x \in R \implies x \in T} | c...
Subset Relation is Transitive/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_Relation_is_Transitive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_Relation_is_Transitive/Proof_1
[ "Subset Relation", "Examples of Transitive Relations", "Subset Relation is Transitive" ]
[ "Definition:Subset Relation", "Definition:Transitive Relation" ]
[ "Hypothetical Syllogism" ]
proofwiki-227
Subset Relation is Transitive
The subset relation is transitive: :$\paren {R \subseteq S} \land \paren {S \subseteq T} \implies R \subseteq T$
Let $V$ be a basic universe. By definition of basic universe, $R$, $S$ and $T$ are all elements of $V$. By the {{axiom-link|Transitivity}}, $R$, $S$ and $T$ are all classes. We are given that $R \subseteq S$ and $S \subseteq T$. Hence by Subclass of Subclass is Subclass, $R$ is a subclass of $T$. By Subclass of Set is ...
The [[Definition:Subset Relation|subset relation]] is [[Definition:Transitive Relation|transitive]]: :$\paren {R \subseteq S} \land \paren {S \subseteq T} \implies R \subseteq T$
Let $V$ be a [[Definition:Basic Universe|basic universe]]. By definition of [[Definition:Basic Universe|basic universe]], $R$, $S$ and $T$ are all [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $V$. By the {{axiom-link|Transitivity}}, $R$, $S$ and $T$ are all [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|classes]]. We are given that $R \su...
Subset Relation is Transitive/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_Relation_is_Transitive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_Relation_is_Transitive/Proof_2
[ "Subset Relation", "Examples of Transitive Relations", "Subset Relation is Transitive" ]
[ "Definition:Subset Relation", "Definition:Transitive Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Basic Universe", "Definition:Basic Universe", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Subclass of Subclass is Subclass", "Definition:Subclass", "Subclass of Set is Set", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-228
Set Inequality
:$S \ne T \iff \paren {S \nsubseteq T} \lor \paren {T \nsubseteq S}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l=S \ne T | o=\iff | r=\neg \paren {S = T} | c= }} {{eqn | o=\iff | r=\neg \paren {\paren {S \subseteq T} \land \paren {T \subseteq S} } | c={{Defof|Set Equality|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | o=\iff | r=\neg \paren {S \subseteq T} \lor \neg \paren {T \subseteq S} ...
:$S \ne T \iff \paren {S \nsubseteq T} \lor \paren {T \nsubseteq S}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l=S \ne T | o=\iff | r=\neg \paren {S = T} | c= }} {{eqn | o=\iff | r=\neg \paren {\paren {S \subseteq T} \land \paren {T \subseteq S} } | c={{Defof|Set Equality|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | o=\iff | r=\neg \paren {S \subseteq T} \lor \neg \paren {T \subseteq S} ...
Set Inequality
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Inequality
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Inequality
[ "Set Theory", "Subsets" ]
[]
[ "De Morgan's Laws (Logic)/Disjunction of Negations", "Category:Set Theory", "Category:Subsets" ]
proofwiki-229
Set Equals Itself
All sets are equal to themselves: :$\forall S: S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \subseteq S | o = \land | r = S \supseteq S | c = Set is Subset of Itself }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S | r = S | c = {{Defof|Set Equality}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Set Equality 0sgjaz6fxne0e6dc2vi4eh1wrgw4gsw
All [[Definition:Set|sets]] are [[Definition:Set Equality|equal]] to themselves: :$\forall S: S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \subseteq S | o = \land | r = S \supseteq S | c = [[Set is Subset of Itself]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S | r = S | c = {{Defof|Set Equality}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Set Equality]] 0sgjaz6fxne0e6dc2vi4eh1wrgw4gsw
Set Equals Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equals_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equals_Itself
[ "Set Equality" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Equality" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Itself", "Category:Set Equality" ]
proofwiki-230
Union is Smallest Superset
Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be sets. Then $S_1 \cup S_2$ is the smallest set containing both $S_1$ and $S_2$. That is: :$\paren {S_1 \subseteq T} \land \paren {S_2 \subseteq T} \iff \paren {S_1 \cup S_2} \subseteq T$
=== Necessary Condition === From Union of Subsets is Subset: :$\paren {S_1 \subseteq T} \land \paren {S_2 \subseteq T} \implies \paren {S_1 \cup S_2} \subseteq T$ {{qed|lemma}}
Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Then $S_1 \cup S_2$ is the [[Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion|smallest set]] containing both $S_1$ and $S_2$. That is: :$\paren {S_1 \subseteq T} \land \paren {S_2 \subseteq T} \iff \paren {S_1 \cup S_2} \subseteq T$
=== Necessary Condition === From [[Union of Subsets is Subset]]: :$\paren {S_1 \subseteq T} \land \paren {S_2 \subseteq T} \implies \paren {S_1 \cup S_2} \subseteq T$ {{qed|lemma}}
Union is Smallest Superset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_is_Smallest_Superset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_is_Smallest_Superset
[ "Set Union", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Smallest Set by Set Inclusion" ]
[ "Union of Subsets is Subset" ]
proofwiki-231
Union with Empty Set
The union of any set with the empty set is the set itself: :$S \cup \O = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = Set is Subset of Itself }} {{eqn | l = \O | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = Empty Set is Subset of All Sets }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S \cup \O | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = Union is Smallest Superset }...
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of any [[Definition:Set|set]] with the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] is the [[Definition:Set|set]] itself: :$S \cup \O = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = [[Set is Subset of Itself]] }} {{eqn | l = \O | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = [[Empty Set is Subset of All Sets]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S \cup \O | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = [[Union is Smallest ...
Union with Empty Set/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Empty_Set/Proof_1
[ "Union with Empty Set", "Set Union", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Itself", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets", "Union is Smallest Superset", "Set is Subset of Union" ]
proofwiki-232
Union with Empty Set
The union of any set with the empty set is the set itself: :$S \cup \O = S$
From Empty Set is Subset of All Sets: :$\O \subseteq S$ From Union with Superset is Superset: :$S \cup \O = S$ {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of any [[Definition:Set|set]] with the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] is the [[Definition:Set|set]] itself: :$S \cup \O = S$
From [[Empty Set is Subset of All Sets]]: :$\O \subseteq S$ From [[Union with Superset is Superset]]: :$S \cup \O = S$ {{qed}}
Union with Empty Set/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Empty_Set/Proof_2
[ "Union with Empty Set", "Set Union", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets", "Union with Superset is Superset" ]
proofwiki-233
Intersection is Subset
The intersection of two sets is a subset of each: :$S \cap T \subseteq S$ :$S \cap T \subseteq T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S \cap T }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r = S \land x \in T | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = Rule of Simplification }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto |...
The [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of each: :$S \cap T \subseteq S$ :$S \cap T \subseteq T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S \cap T }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r = S \land x \in T | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = [[Rule of Simplification]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto ...
Intersection is Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_is_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_is_Subset
[ "Set Intersection", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset" ]
[ "Rule of Simplification" ]
proofwiki-234
Intersection with Empty Set
The intersection of any set with the empty set is itself the empty set: :$S \cap \O = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \cap \O | o = \subseteq | r = \O | c = Intersection is Subset }} {{eqn | l = \O | o = \subseteq | r = S \cap \O | c = Empty Set is Subset of All Sets }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S \cap \O | r = \O | c = {{Defof|Set Equality|index = 2}} ...
The [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of any [[Definition:Set|set]] with the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] is itself the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$S \cap \O = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \cap \O | o = \subseteq | r = \O | c = [[Intersection is Subset]] }} {{eqn | l = \O | o = \subseteq | r = S \cap \O | c = [[Empty Set is Subset of All Sets]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S \cap \O | r = \O | c = {{Defof|Set Equality|inde...
Intersection with Empty Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Empty_Set
[ "Set Intersection", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Intersection is Subset", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets" ]
proofwiki-235
Intersection is Largest Subset
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be sets. Then $T_1 \cap T_2$ is the largest set contained in both $T_1$ and $T_2$. That is: :$S \subseteq T_1 \land S \subseteq T_2 \iff S \subseteq T_1 \cap T_2$
=== Sufficient Condition === From Set is Subset of Intersection of Supersets we have that: :$S \subseteq T_1 \land S \subseteq T_2 \implies S \subseteq T_1 \cap T_2$ {{qed|lemma}}
Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Then $T_1 \cap T_2$ is the [[Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion|largest set]] contained in both $T_1$ and $T_2$. That is: :$S \subseteq T_1 \land S \subseteq T_2 \iff S \subseteq T_1 \cap T_2$
=== Sufficient Condition === From [[Set is Subset of Intersection of Supersets]] we have that: :$S \subseteq T_1 \land S \subseteq T_2 \implies S \subseteq T_1 \cap T_2$ {{qed|lemma}}
Intersection is Largest Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_is_Largest_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_is_Largest_Subset
[ "Set Intersection", "Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Intersection of Supersets" ]
proofwiki-236
Intersection is Subset of Union
The intersection of two sets is a subset of their union: :$S \cap T \subseteq S \cup T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \cap T | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = Intersection is Subset }} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S \cup T | c = Set is Subset of Union }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S \cap T | o = \subseteq | r = S \cup T | c = Subset Relation is...
The [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] is a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of their [[Definition:Set Union|union]]: :$S \cap T \subseteq S \cup T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \cap T | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = [[Intersection is Subset]] }} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S \cup T | c = [[Set is Subset of Union]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S \cap T | o = \subseteq | r = S \cup T | c = [[Subset R...
Intersection is Subset of Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_is_Subset_of_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_is_Subset_of_Union
[ "Set Intersection", "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Union" ]
[ "Intersection is Subset", "Set is Subset of Union", "Subset Relation is Transitive" ]
proofwiki-237
Union Distributes over Intersection
Set union is distributive over set intersection: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$
=== Union Subset of Intersection === Let $\ds x \in S \cup \bigcap \mathbb T$. We need to show that: :$\ds x \in \bigcap_{X \mathop \in \mathbb T} \paren {S \cup X}$ and then by definition of subset we will have shown that: :$\ds S \cup \bigcap \mathbb T \subseteq \bigcap_{X \mathop \in \mathbb T} \paren {S \cup X}$. S...
[[Definition:Set Union|Set union]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Set Intersection|set intersection]]: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$
=== Union Subset of Intersection === Let $\ds x \in S \cup \bigcap \mathbb T$. We need to show that: :$\ds x \in \bigcap_{X \mathop \in \mathbb T} \paren {S \cup X}$ and then by definition of [[Definition:Subset|subset]] we will have shown that: :$\ds S \cup \bigcap \mathbb T \subseteq \bigcap_{X \mathop \in \mathbb...
Union Distributes over Intersection/General Result/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_Distributes_over_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_Distributes_over_Intersection/General_Result/Proof
[ "Union Distributes over Intersection", "Distributive Laws of Set Theory", "Set Union", "Set Intersection", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Union", "Proof by Cases", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set Union", "Proof by Cases", "...
proofwiki-238
Union Distributes over Intersection
Set union is distributive over set intersection: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in R \cup \paren {S \cap T} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in R \lor \paren {x \in S \land x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} and {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \paren {x \in R \lor x \in S} \land \paren {x \in R \lor ...
[[Definition:Set Union|Set union]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Set Intersection|set intersection]]: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in R \cup \paren {S \cap T} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in R \lor \paren {x \in S \land x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} and {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \paren {x \in R \lor x \in S} \land \paren {x \in R \lor ...
Union Distributes over Intersection/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_Distributes_over_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_Distributes_over_Intersection/Proof_1
[ "Union Distributes over Intersection", "Distributive Laws of Set Theory", "Set Union", "Set Intersection", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Set Intersection" ]
[ "Rule of Distribution/Disjunction Distributes over Conjunction/Left Distributive" ]
proofwiki-239
Union Distributes over Intersection
Set union is distributive over set intersection: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$
From Intersection Distributes over Union: :$R \cap \paren {S \cup T} = \paren {R \cap S} \cup \paren {R \cap T}$ From the Duality Principle for Sets, exchanging $\cup$ for $\cap$ throughout, and vice versa, reveals the result: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$ {{qed}}
[[Definition:Set Union|Set union]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Set Intersection|set intersection]]: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$
From [[Intersection Distributes over Union]]: :$R \cap \paren {S \cup T} = \paren {R \cap S} \cup \paren {R \cap T}$ From the [[Duality Principle for Sets]], exchanging $\cup$ for $\cap$ throughout, and vice versa, reveals the result: :$R \cup \paren {S \cap T} = \paren {R \cup S} \cap \paren {R \cup T}$ {{qed}}
Union Distributes over Intersection/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_Distributes_over_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_Distributes_over_Intersection/Proof_2
[ "Union Distributes over Intersection", "Distributive Laws of Set Theory", "Set Union", "Set Intersection", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Set Intersection" ]
[ "Intersection Distributes over Union", "Duality Principle for Sets" ]
proofwiki-240
Intersection Distributes over Union
Set intersection is distributive over set union: :$R \cap \paren {S \cup T} = \paren {R \cap S} \cup \paren {R \cap T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in R \cap \paren {S \cup T} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in R \land \paren {x \in S \lor x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} and {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \paren {x \in R \land x \in S} \lor \paren {x \in R \land...
[[Definition:Set Intersection|Set intersection]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Set Union|set union]]: :$R \cap \paren {S \cup T} = \paren {R \cap S} \cup \paren {R \cap T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in R \cap \paren {S \cup T} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = x \in R \land \paren {x \in S \lor x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Set Union}} and {{Defof|Set Intersection}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \paren {x \in R \land x \in S} \lor \paren {x \in R \land...
Intersection Distributes over Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_Distributes_over_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_Distributes_over_Union
[ "Intersection Distributes over Union", "Distributive Laws of Set Theory", "Set Intersection", "Set Union", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Set Union" ]
[ "Rule of Distribution/Conjunction Distributes over Disjunction/Left Distributive" ]
proofwiki-241
Set Difference is Subset
:$S \setminus T \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \in S \setminus T | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S \land x \notin T | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S | c = Rule of Simplification }} {{end-eqn}} The result follows from the definition of subset. {{Qed}}
:$S \setminus T \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \in S \setminus T | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S \land x \notin T | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadsto | r = x \in S | c = [[Rule of Simplification]] }} {{end-eqn}} The result follows from the definition of [[Definition:Subset|subset]]. {{Qed}}
Set Difference is Subset/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_is_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_is_Subset/Proof_1
[ "Set Difference", "Subsets", "Set Difference is Subset" ]
[]
[ "Rule of Simplification", "Definition:Subset" ]
proofwiki-242
Set Difference is Subset
:$S \setminus T \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \setminus T | r = S \cap \complement_S \left({T}\right) | c = Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement }} {{eqn | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = Intersection is Subset }} {{end-eqn}} {{Qed}}
:$S \setminus T \subseteq S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \setminus T | r = S \cap \complement_S \left({T}\right) | c = [[Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement]] }} {{eqn | o = \subseteq | r = S | c = [[Intersection is Subset]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{Qed}}
Set Difference is Subset/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_is_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_is_Subset/Proof_2
[ "Set Difference", "Subsets", "Set Difference is Subset" ]
[]
[ "Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement", "Intersection is Subset" ]
proofwiki-243
Set Difference with Empty Set is Self
The set difference between a set and the empty set is the set itself: :$S \setminus \O = S$
From Set Difference is Subset: :$S \setminus \O \subseteq S$ From the definition of the empty set: :$\forall x \in S: x \notin \O$ Let $x \in S$. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r = S \land x \notin \O | c =...
The [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]] between a [[Definition:Set|set]] and the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] is the [[Definition:Set|set]] itself: :$S \setminus \O = S$
From [[Set Difference is Subset]]: :$S \setminus \O \subseteq S$ From the definition of the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$\forall x \in S: x \notin \O$ Let $x \in S$. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | o = \in | r = S | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | o = \in | r...
Set Difference with Empty Set is Self
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Empty_Set_is_Self
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Empty_Set_is_Self
[ "Set Difference", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Set Difference is Subset", "Definition:Empty Set", "Rule of Conjunction", "Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-244
Set Difference with Self is Empty Set
The set difference of a set with itself is the empty set: :$S \setminus S = \O$
From Set is Subset of Itself: :$S \subseteq S$ From Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set we have: :$S \subseteq T \iff S \setminus T = \O$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] with itself is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$S \setminus S = \O$
From [[Set is Subset of Itself]]: :$S \subseteq S$ From [[Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set]] we have: :$S \subseteq T \iff S \setminus T = \O$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
Set Difference with Self is Empty Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Self_is_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Self_is_Empty_Set
[ "Set Difference", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Itself", "Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set" ]
proofwiki-245
Set Difference Equals First Set iff Sets are Disjoint
:$S \setminus T = S \iff S \cap T = \O$
Assume $S, T \subseteq \Bbb U$ where $\Bbb U$ is a universal set. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \setminus T | r = S }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = S \cap \map \complement T | r = S | c = Set Difference as Intersection with Complement }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = S | o = \...
:$S \setminus T = S \iff S \cap T = \O$
Assume $S, T \subseteq \Bbb U$ where $\Bbb U$ is a [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \setminus T | r = S }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = S \cap \map \complement T | r = S | c = [[Set Difference as Intersection with Complement]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoa...
Set Difference Equals First Set iff Sets are Disjoint
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Equals_First_Set_iff_Sets_are_Disjoint
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Equals_First_Set_iff_Sets_are_Disjoint
[ "Set Difference", "Set Intersection", "Disjoint Sets" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Universal Set", "Set Difference as Intersection with Complement", "Intersection with Subset is Subset", "Intersection with Complement is Empty iff Subset", "Complement of Complement" ]
proofwiki-246
Equal Set Differences iff Equal Intersections
:$R \setminus S = R \setminus T \iff R \cap S = R \cap T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = R \setminus S | r = R \setminus T }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \set {x \in R: x \notin S} | r = \set {x \in R: x \notin T} | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | q = \forall x \in R | l = x \notin S | o = \iff | r...
:$R \setminus S = R \setminus T \iff R \cap S = R \cap T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = R \setminus S | r = R \setminus T }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \set {x \in R: x \notin S} | r = \set {x \in R: x \notin T} | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | q = \forall x \in R | l = x \notin S | o = \iff | r...
Equal Set Differences iff Equal Intersections/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equal_Set_Differences_iff_Equal_Intersections
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equal_Set_Differences_iff_Equal_Intersections/Proof_1
[ "Set Difference", "Set Intersection", "Equal Set Differences iff Equal Intersections" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-247
Equal Set Differences iff Equal Intersections
:$R \setminus S = R \setminus T \iff R \cap S = R \cap T$
From Set Difference and Intersection form Partition: : $\paren {R \setminus S} \cup \paren {R \cap S} = R = \paren {R \setminus T} \cup \paren {R \cap T}$ : $\paren {R \cap S} \cap \paren {R \setminus S} = \O = \paren {R \cap T} \cap \paren {R \setminus T}$ whatever $R, S, T$ might be. Let $R \setminus S = R \setminus ...
:$R \setminus S = R \setminus T \iff R \cap S = R \cap T$
From [[Set Difference and Intersection form Partition]]: : $\paren {R \setminus S} \cup \paren {R \cap S} = R = \paren {R \setminus T} \cup \paren {R \cap T}$ : $\paren {R \cap S} \cap \paren {R \setminus S} = \O = \paren {R \cap T} \cap \paren {R \setminus T}$ whatever $R, S, T$ might be. Let $R \setminus S = R \set...
Equal Set Differences iff Equal Intersections/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equal_Set_Differences_iff_Equal_Intersections
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equal_Set_Differences_iff_Equal_Intersections/Proof_2
[ "Set Difference", "Set Intersection", "Equal Set Differences iff Equal Intersections" ]
[]
[ "Set Difference and Intersection form Partition", "Set Difference with Union is Set Difference", "Set Difference with Disjoint Set", "Set Difference with Union is Set Difference", "Set Difference with Disjoint Set" ]
proofwiki-248
Euler's Number is Irrational
Euler's number $e$ is irrational.
{{AimForCont}} that $e$ is rational. Then there exist coprime integers $m$ and $n$ (and we can choose $n$ to be positive) such that: :$\dfrac m n = e = \ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {i!}$ from the definition of Euler's number. Multiplying both sides by $n!$, observe that: :$\dfrac m n n! = n! \ds \sum_{i \mat...
[[Definition:Euler's Number|Euler's number]] $e$ is [[Definition:Irrational Number|irrational]].
{{AimForCont}} that $e$ is [[Definition:Rational Number|rational]]. Then there exist [[Definition:Coprime Integers|coprime integers]] $m$ and $n$ (and we can choose $n$ to be [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive]]) such that: :$\dfrac m n = e = \ds \sum_{i \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {i!}$ from the definition of [[...
Euler's Number is Irrational
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler's_Number_is_Irrational
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler's_Number_is_Irrational
[ "Irrationality Proofs", "Euler's Number" ]
[ "Definition:Euler's Number", "Definition:Irrational Number" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Coprime/Integers", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Euler's Number/Limit of Series", "Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Subtraction/Integers", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:...
proofwiki-249
Set Difference with Intersection
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets.
Consider $R, S, T \subseteq \mathbb U$, where $\mathbb U$ is considered as the universe. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \setminus S} \cap T | r = \paren {R \cap \map \complement S} \cap T | c = Set Difference as Intersection with Complement }} {{eqn | r = \paren {R \cap T} \cap \map \complement S...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]].
Consider $R, S, T \subseteq \mathbb U$, where $\mathbb U$ is considered as the [[Definition:Universal Set|universe]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \setminus S} \cap T | r = \paren {R \cap \map \complement S} \cap T | c = [[Set Difference as Intersection with Complement]] }} {{eqn | r = \pare...
Intersection with Set Difference is Set Difference with Intersection/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Set_Difference_is_Set_Difference_with_Intersection/Proof_1
[ "Set Difference", "Set Intersection", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Universal Set", "Set Difference as Intersection with Complement", "Intersection is Commutative", "Intersection is Associative", "Set Difference as Intersection with Complement" ]
proofwiki-250
Set Difference with Intersection
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in \paren {R \setminus S} \cap T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \paren {x \in R \land x \notin S} \land x \in T | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} and {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \par...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = x \in \paren {R \setminus S} \cap T | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \paren {x \in R \land x \notin S} \land x \in T | c = {{Defof|Set Intersection}} and {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | r = \par...
Intersection with Set Difference is Set Difference with Intersection/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Set_Difference_is_Set_Difference_with_Intersection/Proof_2
[ "Set Difference", "Set Intersection", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Rule of Commutation", "Rule of Association" ]
proofwiki-251
Pascal's Rule
For positive integers $n, k$ with $1 \le k \le n$: :$\dbinom n {k - 1} + \dbinom n k = \dbinom {n + 1} k$ This is also valid for the real number definition: :$\forall r \in \R, k \in \Z: \dbinom r {k - 1} + \dbinom r k = \dbinom {r + 1} k$
Suppose you were a member of a club with $n + 1$ members (including you). Suppose it were time to elect a committee of $k$ members from that club. From Cardinality of Set of Subsets, there are $\dbinom {n + 1} k$ ways to select the members to form this committee. Now, you yourself may or may not be elected a member of ...
For [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] $n, k$ with $1 \le k \le n$: :$\dbinom n {k - 1} + \dbinom n k = \dbinom {n + 1} k$ This is also valid for the [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient/Real Numbers|real number definition]]: :$\forall r \in \R, k \in \Z: \dbinom r {k - 1} + \dbinom r k = \dbinom {r + 1} ...
Suppose you were a member of a club with $n + 1$ members (including you). Suppose it were time to elect a committee of $k$ members from that club. From [[Cardinality of Set of Subsets]], there are $\dbinom {n + 1} k$ ways to select the members to form this committee. Now, you yourself may or may not be elected a me...
Pascal's Rule/Combinatorial Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pascal's_Rule
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pascal's_Rule/Combinatorial_Proof
[ "Pascal's Rule", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient/Real Numbers" ]
[ "Cardinality of Set of Subsets", "Cardinality of Set of Subsets", "Cardinality of Set of Subsets" ]
proofwiki-252
Pascal's Rule
For positive integers $n, k$ with $1 \le k \le n$: :$\dbinom n {k - 1} + \dbinom n k = \dbinom {n + 1} k$ This is also valid for the real number definition: :$\forall r \in \R, k \in \Z: \dbinom r {k - 1} + \dbinom r k = \dbinom {r + 1} k$
Let $n, k \in \N$ with $1 \le k \le n$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom n k + \binom n {k - 1} | r = \frac {n!} {k! \, \paren {n - k}!} + \frac {n!} {\paren {k - 1}! \, \paren {n - \paren {k - 1} }!} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {n! \, \paren {n - \paren {k - 1} } } {k! \, \par...
For [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integers]] $n, k$ with $1 \le k \le n$: :$\dbinom n {k - 1} + \dbinom n k = \dbinom {n + 1} k$ This is also valid for the [[Definition:Binomial Coefficient/Real Numbers|real number definition]]: :$\forall r \in \R, k \in \Z: \dbinom r {k - 1} + \dbinom r k = \dbinom {r + 1} ...
Let $n, k \in \N$ with $1 \le k \le n$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \binom n k + \binom n {k - 1} | r = \frac {n!} {k! \, \paren {n - k}!} + \frac {n!} {\paren {k - 1}! \, \paren {n - \paren {k - 1} }!} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {n! \, \paren {n - \paren {k - 1} } } {k! \, \pa...
Pascal's Rule/Direct Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pascal's_Rule
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pascal's_Rule/Direct_Proof
[ "Pascal's Rule", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient/Real Numbers" ]
[ "Addition of Fractions" ]
proofwiki-253
Set Difference Union Intersection
:$S = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T} | r = \paren {\paren {S \setminus T} \cup S} \cap \paren {\paren {S \setminus T} \cup T} | c = Union Distributes over Intersection }} {{eqn | r = S \cap \paren {\paren {S \setminus T} \cup T} | c = Set Difference Union First Set i...
:$S = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T} | r = \paren {\paren {S \setminus T} \cup S} \cap \paren {\paren {S \setminus T} \cup T} | c = [[Union Distributes over Intersection]] }} {{eqn | r = S \cap \paren {\paren {S \setminus T} \cup T} | c = [[Set Difference Union First...
Set Difference Union Intersection/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Union_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Union_Intersection/Proof_1
[ "Set Difference", "Set Union", "Set Intersection", "Set Difference Union Intersection" ]
[]
[ "Union Distributes over Intersection", "Set Difference Union First Set is First Set", "Set Difference Union Second Set is Union", "Absorption Laws (Set Theory)/Intersection Absorbs Union" ]
proofwiki-254
Set Difference Union Intersection
:$S = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T} | r = S \setminus \paren {T \setminus T} | c = Set Difference with Set Difference is Union of Set Difference with Intersection }} {{eqn | r = S \setminus \O | c = Set Difference with Self is Empty Set }} {{eqn | r = S | c = ...
:$S = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T} | r = S \setminus \paren {T \setminus T} | c = [[Set Difference with Set Difference is Union of Set Difference with Intersection]] }} {{eqn | r = S \setminus \O | c = [[Set Difference with Self is Empty Set]] }} {{eqn | r = S ...
Set Difference Union Intersection/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Union_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Union_Intersection/Proof_2
[ "Set Difference", "Set Union", "Set Intersection", "Set Difference Union Intersection" ]
[]
[ "Set Difference with Set Difference is Union of Set Difference with Intersection", "Set Difference with Self is Empty Set", "Set Difference with Empty Set is Self" ]
proofwiki-255
Set Difference Union Intersection
:$S = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T}$
By Set Difference is Subset: :$S \setminus T \subseteq S$ By Intersection is Subset: :$S \cap T \subseteq S$ Hence from Union is Smallest Superset: :$\paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T} \subseteq S$ Let $s \in S$. Either: :$s \in T$, in which case $s \in S \cap T$ by definition of set intersection or :$s \not...
:$S = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T}$
By [[Set Difference is Subset]]: :$S \setminus T \subseteq S$ By [[Intersection is Subset]]: :$S \cap T \subseteq S$ Hence from [[Union is Smallest Superset]]: :$\paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {S \cap T} \subseteq S$ Let $s \in S$. Either: :$s \in T$, in which case $s \in S \cap T$ by definition of [[Definitio...
Set Difference Union Intersection/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Union_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_Union_Intersection/Proof_3
[ "Set Difference", "Set Union", "Set Intersection", "Set Difference Union Intersection" ]
[]
[ "Set Difference is Subset", "Intersection is Subset", "Union is Smallest Superset", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-256
Absorption Laws (Logic)
For any two propositions $p$ and $q$, we have:
By calculation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \land \paren {p \lor q} | r = \paren {p \lor \bot} \land \paren {p \lor q} | c = Disjunction with Contradiction }} {{eqn | r = p \lor \paren {\bot \land q} | c = Disjunction is Left Distributive over Conjunction }} {{eqn | r = p \lor \bot | c = Conjunc...
For any two [[Definition:Proposition|propositions]] $p$ and $q$, we have:
By calculation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \land \paren {p \lor q} | r = \paren {p \lor \bot} \land \paren {p \lor q} | c = [[Disjunction with Contradiction]] }} {{eqn | r = p \lor \paren {\bot \land q} | c = [[Disjunction is Left Distributive over Conjunction]] }} {{eqn | r = p \lor \bot | c ...
Absorption Laws (Logic)/Conjunction Absorbs Disjunction/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)/Conjunction_Absorbs_Disjunction/Proof_2
[ "Conjunction", "Disjunction" ]
[ "Definition:Proposition" ]
[ "Disjunction with Contradiction", "Rule of Distribution/Disjunction Distributes over Conjunction/Left Distributive", "Conjunction with Contradiction", "Disjunction with Contradiction" ]
proofwiki-257
Absorption Laws (Logic)
For any two propositions $p$ and $q$, we have:
We apply the Method of Truth Tables. As can be seen by inspection, the appropriate truth values match for all boolean interpretations. $\begin{array}{|ccccc||c|} \hline p & \land & (p & \lor & q) & p \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \F & \F & \F \\ \F & \F & \F & \T & \T & \F \\ \T & \T & \T & \T & \F & \T \\ \T & \T & \T & \T...
For any two [[Definition:Proposition|propositions]] $p$ and $q$, we have:
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]. As can be seen by inspection, the appropriate [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] match for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. $\begin{array}{|ccccc||c|} \hline p & \land & (p & \lor & q) & p \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \F & \F & \F \\ \F & \F ...
Absorption Laws (Logic)/Conjunction Absorbs Disjunction/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)/Conjunction_Absorbs_Disjunction/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Conjunction", "Disjunction" ]
[ "Definition:Proposition" ]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-258
Absorption Laws (Logic)
For any two propositions $p$ and $q$, we have:
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \lor \paren {p \land q} | r = \paren {p \land \top} \lor \paren {p \land q} | c = Conjunction with Tautology }} {{eqn | r = p \land \paren {\top \lor q} | c = Conjunction is Left Distributive over Disjunction }} {{eqn | r = p \land \top | c = Disjunction with Tautolog...
For any two [[Definition:Proposition|propositions]] $p$ and $q$, we have:
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = p \lor \paren {p \land q} | r = \paren {p \land \top} \lor \paren {p \land q} | c = [[Conjunction with Tautology]] }} {{eqn | r = p \land \paren {\top \lor q} | c = [[Conjunction is Left Distributive over Disjunction]] }} {{eqn | r = p \land \top | c = [[Disjunction wit...
Absorption Laws (Logic)/Disjunction Absorbs Conjunction/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)/Disjunction_Absorbs_Conjunction/Proof_2
[ "Conjunction", "Disjunction" ]
[ "Definition:Proposition" ]
[ "Conjunction with Tautology", "Rule of Distribution/Conjunction Distributes over Disjunction/Left Distributive", "Disjunction with Tautology", "Conjunction with Tautology" ]
proofwiki-259
Absorption Laws (Logic)
For any two propositions $p$ and $q$, we have:
We apply the Method of Truth Tables. As can be seen by inspection, the appropriate truth values match for all boolean interpretations. $\begin{array}{|ccccc||c|} \hline p & \lor & (p & \land & q) & p \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \F & \F & \F \\ \F & \F & \F & \F & \T & \F \\ \T & \T & \T & \F & \F & \T \\ \T & \T & \T & \T...
For any two [[Definition:Proposition|propositions]] $p$ and $q$, we have:
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]. As can be seen by inspection, the appropriate [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] match for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. $\begin{array}{|ccccc||c|} \hline p & \lor & (p & \land & q) & p \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \F & \F & \F \\ \F & \F ...
Absorption Laws (Logic)/Disjunction Absorbs Conjunction/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Absorption_Laws_(Logic)/Disjunction_Absorbs_Conjunction/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Conjunction", "Disjunction" ]
[ "Definition:Proposition" ]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-260
Set Difference with Set Difference
:$S \setminus \paren {S \setminus T} = S \cap T = T \setminus \paren {T \setminus S}$
From the {{axiom-link|Transitivity}}, all sets are classes. The result then follows from Class Difference with Class Difference. {{finish|Find the result that demonstrate the set difference of two sets is also a set, intersection as well. Probably via subset of set is set or something.}}
:$S \setminus \paren {S \setminus T} = S \cap T = T \setminus \paren {T \setminus S}$
From the {{axiom-link|Transitivity}}, all [[Definition:Set|sets]] are [[Definition:Class (Class Theory)|classes]]. The result then follows from [[Class Difference with Class Difference]]. {{finish|Find the result that demonstrate the set difference of two sets is also a set, intersection as well. Probably via subset ...
Set Difference with Set Difference/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Set_Difference
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_with_Set_Difference/Proof_2
[ "Set Difference with Set Difference", "Set Intersection", "Set Difference" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Class (Class Theory)", "Class Difference with Class Difference" ]
proofwiki-261
Set Difference is Anticommutative
Set difference is an anticommutative operation: :$S = T \iff S \setminus T = T \setminus S = \O$
From Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set we have: :$S \subseteq T \iff S \setminus T = \O$ :$T \subseteq S \iff T \setminus S = \O$ The result follows from definition of set equality: :$S = T \iff \paren {S \subseteq T} \land \paren {T \subseteq S}$ {{qed}}
[[Definition:Set Difference|Set difference]] is an [[Definition:Anticommutative|anticommutative]] operation: :$S = T \iff S \setminus T = T \setminus S = \O$
From [[Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set]] we have: :$S \subseteq T \iff S \setminus T = \O$ :$T \subseteq S \iff T \setminus S = \O$ The result follows from definition of [[Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2|set equality]]: :$S = T \iff \paren {S \subseteq T} \land \paren {T \subseteq S}$ {{qed}}
Set Difference is Anticommutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_is_Anticommutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_is_Anticommutative
[ "Set Difference", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Anticommutative" ]
[ "Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set", "Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-262
Dirichlet's Test for Uniform Convergence
Let $D$ be a set. Let $\struct {V, \norm {\,\cdot\,} }$ be a normed vector space. Let $a_i, b_i$ be mappings from $D \to M$. {{explain|What is $M$? Should be $V$?}} Let the following conditions be satisfied: :$(1): \quad$ The sequence of partial sums of $\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \map {a_n} x$ be bounded on $D$ :...
Suppose $\map {b_n} x \ge \map {b_{n + 1} } x$ for each $x \in D$. All we need to show is that: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \size {\map {b_n} x - \map {b_{n + 1} } x}$ converges uniformly on $D$. {{explain|Why is the above sufficient? On the surface of it, no reference has been made to $\map {a_n} x$. Its connect...
Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\struct {V, \norm {\,\cdot\,} }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $a_i, b_i$ be [[Definition:Mapping|mappings]] from $D \to M$. {{explain|What is $M$? Should be $V$?}} Let the following conditions be satisfied: :$(1): \quad$ The [[Definition...
Suppose $\map {b_n} x \ge \map {b_{n + 1} } x$ for each $x \in D$. All we need to show is that: :$\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \size {\map {b_n} x - \map {b_{n + 1} } x}$ [[Definition:Uniform Convergence|converges uniformly]] on $D$. {{explain|Why is the above sufficient? On the surface of it, no reference has bee...
Dirichlet's Test for Uniform Convergence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirichlet's_Test_for_Uniform_Convergence
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dirichlet's_Test_for_Uniform_Convergence
[ "Dirichlet's Test for Uniform Convergence", "Convergence Tests", "Convergence", "Direct Proofs", "Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Series/Sequence of Partial Sums", "Definition:Bounded Sequence", "Definition:Monotone (Order Theory)/Sequence", "Definition:Uniform Convergence", "Definition:Uniform Convergence" ]
[ "Definition:Uniform Convergence", "Definition:Cauchy Sequence/Cauchy Criterion", "Definition:Uniform Convergence" ]
proofwiki-263
Relative Complement of Empty Set
The relative complement of the empty set is the set itself: :$\relcomp S \O = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S \O | r = S \setminus \O | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = S | c = Set Difference with Empty Set is Self }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] of the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] is the [[Definition:Set|set]] itself: :$\relcomp S \O = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S \O | r = S \setminus \O | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = S | c = [[Set Difference with Empty Set is Self]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Relative Complement of Empty Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_of_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_of_Empty_Set
[ "Relative Complement", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Set Difference with Empty Set is Self" ]
proofwiki-264
Relative Complement with Self is Empty Set
The relative complement of a set in itself is the empty set: :$\relcomp S S = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S S | r = S \setminus S | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = \O | c = Set Difference with Self is Empty Set }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] in itself is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$\relcomp S S = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S S | r = S \setminus S | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = \O | c = [[Set Difference with Self is Empty Set]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Relative Complement with Self is Empty Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_with_Self_is_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_with_Self_is_Empty_Set
[ "Relative Complement", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Set Difference with Self is Empty Set" ]
proofwiki-265
Relative Complement of Relative Complement
:$\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = T$
By the definition of relative complement: :$\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = S \setminus \paren {S \setminus T}$ Let $t \in T$. Then by the definition of set difference: :$t \notin S \setminus T$ Since $t \in T$ and $T \subseteq S$, by the definition of subset: :$t \in S$ Thus: :$t \in \paren {S \setminus \paren {S \setminu...
:$\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = T$
By the definition of [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]]: :$\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = S \setminus \paren {S \setminus T}$ Let $t \in T$. Then by the definition of [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]]: :$t \notin S \setminus T$ Since $t \in T$ and $T \subseteq S$, by the definition of [[D...
Relative Complement of Relative Complement/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_of_Relative_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_of_Relative_Complement/Proof_1
[ "Relative Complement of Relative Complement", "Relative Complement" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:subset", "Conditional is Equivalent to Negation of Conjunction with Negative/Formulation 1/Reverse Implication", "Modus Ponendo Ponens" ]
proofwiki-266
Relative Complement of Relative Complement
:$\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S {\relcomp S T} | r = S \setminus \paren {S \setminus T} | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = S \cap T | c = Set Difference with Set Difference }} {{end-eqn}} The definition of the relative complement requires that: :$T \subseteq S$ But from Intersecti...
:$\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S {\relcomp S T} | r = S \setminus \paren {S \setminus T} | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = S \cap T | c = [[Set Difference with Set Difference]] }} {{end-eqn}} The definition of the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] requires t...
Relative Complement of Relative Complement/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_of_Relative_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Relative_Complement_of_Relative_Complement/Proof_2
[ "Relative Complement of Relative Complement", "Relative Complement" ]
[]
[ "Set Difference with Set Difference", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Intersection with Subset is Subset" ]
proofwiki-267
Intersection with Relative Complement is Empty
The intersection of a set and its relative complement is the empty set: :$T \cap \relcomp S T = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T \cap \relcomp S T | r = \paren {S \setminus T} \cap T | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = \O | c = Set Difference Intersection with Second Set is Empty Set }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] and its [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$T \cap \relcomp S T = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = T \cap \relcomp S T | r = \paren {S \setminus T} \cap T | c = {{Defof|Relative Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = \O | c = [[Set Difference Intersection with Second Set is Empty Set]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Intersection with Relative Complement is Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Relative_Complement_is_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Relative_Complement_is_Empty
[ "Relative Complement", "Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Set Difference Intersection with Second Set is Empty Set" ]
proofwiki-268
Union with Relative Complement
The union of a set $T$ and its relative complement in $S$ is the set $S$: :$\relcomp S T \cup T = S$
=== Step 1 === By the definition of relative complement, we have that: :$\relcomp S T \subseteq S$ and: :$T \subseteq S$ Hence by Union is Smallest Superset: :$\relcomp S T \cup T\subseteq S$ {{qed|lemma}}
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] $T$ and its [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] in $S$ is the set $S$: :$\relcomp S T \cup T = S$
=== Step 1 === By the definition of [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]], we have that: :$\relcomp S T \subseteq S$ and: :$T \subseteq S$ Hence by [[Union is Smallest Superset]]: :$\relcomp S T \cup T\subseteq S$ {{qed|lemma}}
Union with Relative Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Relative_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Relative_Complement
[ "Relative Complement", "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Relative Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Union is Smallest Superset", "Definition:Relative Complement" ]
proofwiki-269
Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement
Let $A, B \subseteq S$. Then the set difference between $A$ and $B$ can be expressed as the intersection with the relative complement with respect to $S$: :$A \setminus B = A \cap \relcomp S B$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A \setminus B | r = \set {x: x \in A \land x \notin B} | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: \paren {x \in A \land x \in X} \land x \notin B} | c = {{Defof|Subset}}, Modus Ponens and Rule of Conjunction }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: x \in A \land \paren {x \in X \l...
Let $A, B \subseteq S$. Then the [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]] between $A$ and $B$ can be expressed as the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] with the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] with respect to $S$: :$A \setminus B = A \cap \relcomp S B$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A \setminus B | r = \set {x: x \in A \land x \notin B} | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: \paren {x \in A \land x \in X} \land x \notin B} | c = {{Defof|Subset}}, [[Modus Ponens]] and [[Rule of Conjunction]] }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: x \in A \land \paren {x ...
Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_as_Intersection_with_Relative_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_as_Intersection_with_Relative_Complement
[ "Set Difference", "Relative Complement", "Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Relative Complement" ]
[ "Modus Ponendo Ponens", "Rule of Conjunction", "Rule of Association/Conjunction" ]
proofwiki-270
Equivalence of Axiom Schemata for Groups
In the definition of a group, the axioms for the existence of an identity element and for closure under taking inverses can be replaced by the following two axioms: :Given a group $G$, there exists at least one element $e \in G$ such that $e$ is a '''left identity'''; :For any element $g$ in a group $G$, there exists a...
Suppose we define a group $G$ in the usual way, but make the first pair of axiom replacements listed above: :the existence of a left identity :every element has a left inverse. Let $e \in G$ be a left identity and $g \in G$. Then, from Left Inverse for All is Right Inverse, each left inverse is also a right inverse wit...
In the definition of a [[Definition:Group|group]], the [[Axiom:Group Axioms|axioms]] for the existence of an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] and for [[Definition:Closed Algebraic Structure|closure]] under taking [[Definition:Inverse Element|inverses]] can be replaced by the following two axioms: :Give...
Suppose we define a [[Definition:Group|group]] $G$ in the usual way, but make the first pair of axiom replacements listed above: :the existence of a [[Definition:Left Identity|left identity]] :every element has a [[Definition:Left Inverse Element|left inverse]]. Let $e \in G$ be a [[Definition:Left Identity|left iden...
Equivalence of Axiom Schemata for Groups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Axiom_Schemata_for_Groups
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Axiom_Schemata_for_Groups
[ "Group Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Axiom:Group Axioms", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)/Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Inverse", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Left Identity", "Definition...
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Left Identity", "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Left Inverse", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Left Identity", "Left Inverse for All is Right Inverse", "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Left Inverse", "Definition:Inverse (Ab...
proofwiki-271
Group has Latin Square Property
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Then $G$ satisfies the Latin square property. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a unique $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a unique $h \in G$ such that $h \circ a = b$.
Follows directly from the definition of both a Cayley table and a Latin square.
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then $G$ satisfies the [[Definition:Latin Square Property|Latin square property]]. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $h \in G$...
Follows directly from the definition of both a [[Definition:Cayley Table|Cayley table]] and a [[Definition:Latin Square|Latin square]].
Group has Latin Square Property/Corollary/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property/Corollary/Proof_1
[ "Group has Latin Square Property", "Latin Square Property", "Latin Squares", "Group Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Definition:Cayley Table", "Definition:Latin Square" ]
proofwiki-272
Group has Latin Square Property
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Then $G$ satisfies the Latin square property. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a unique $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a unique $h \in G$ such that $h \circ a = b$.
Let $G$ be a finite group whose order is $n$. Let $\tuple {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be the elements of the underlying set of $G$ in the order they appear in the headings of the Cayley table of $G$. Consider the row of the Cayley table headed with $a$. The elements of that row are: :$\tuple {a x_1, a x_2, \ldots, a x_n}$...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then $G$ satisfies the [[Definition:Latin Square Property|Latin square property]]. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $h \in G$...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Finite Group|finite group]] whose [[Definition:Order of Structure|order]] is $n$. Let $\tuple {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be the [[Definition:Element|elements]] of the [[Definition:Underlying Set of Structure|underlying set]] of $G$ in the order they appear in the headings of the [[Definition:Ca...
Group has Latin Square Property/Corollary/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property/Corollary/Proof_2
[ "Group has Latin Square Property", "Latin Square Property", "Latin Squares", "Group Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Underlying Set/Abstract Algebra", "Definition:Cayley Table", "Definition:Array/Row", "Definition:Cayley Table", "Definition:Array/Element", "Definition:Array/Row", "Definition:Regular Representations/Left...
proofwiki-273
Group has Latin Square Property
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Then $G$ satisfies the Latin square property. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a unique $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a unique $h \in G$ such that $h \circ a = b$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = g | r = a^{-1} \circ b }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \circ g | r = a \circ \paren {a^{-1} \circ b} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \circ g | r = \paren {a \circ a^{-1} } \circ b | c = {{Group-axiom|1}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \circ g | ...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then $G$ satisfies the [[Definition:Latin Square Property|Latin square property]]. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $h \in G$...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = g | r = a^{-1} \circ b }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \circ g | r = a \circ \paren {a^{-1} \circ b} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \circ g | r = \paren {a \circ a^{-1} } \circ b | c = {{Group-axiom|1}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a \circ g | ...
Group has Latin Square Property/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property/Proof_1
[ "Group has Latin Square Property", "Latin Square Property", "Latin Squares", "Group Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Unique" ]
[]
proofwiki-274
Group has Latin Square Property
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Then $G$ satisfies the Latin square property. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a unique $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a unique $h \in G$ such that $h \circ a = b$.
We shall prove that this is true for the first equation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a \circ g | r = b }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ g} | r = a^{-1} \circ b | c = $\circ$ is a Cancellable Binary Operation }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \paren {a^{-1}...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then $G$ satisfies the [[Definition:Latin Square Property|Latin square property]]. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $h \in G$...
We shall prove that this is true for the first equation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a \circ g | r = b }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ g} | r = a^{-1} \circ b | c = $\circ$ is a [[Cancellation Laws|Cancellable Binary Operation]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom ...
Group has Latin Square Property/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property/Proof_2
[ "Group has Latin Square Property", "Latin Square Property", "Latin Squares", "Group Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Cancellation Laws", "Definition:Logical Equivalence" ]
proofwiki-275
Group has Latin Square Property
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Then $G$ satisfies the Latin square property. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a unique $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a unique $h \in G$ such that $h \circ a = b$.
Suppose that $\exists x, y \in G: a \circ x = b = a \circ y$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a \circ x | r = a \circ y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ x} | r = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ y} | c = {{Group-axiom|3}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \paren {a...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then $G$ satisfies the [[Definition:Latin Square Property|Latin square property]]. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $h \in G$...
Suppose that $\exists x, y \in G: a \circ x = b = a \circ y$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a \circ x | r = a \circ y | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ x} | r = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ y} | c = {{Group-axiom|3}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \paren {...
Group has Latin Square Property/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property/Proof_3
[ "Group has Latin Square Property", "Latin Square Property", "Latin Squares", "Group Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Definition:Unique", "Axiom:Group Axioms", "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Inverse" ]
proofwiki-276
Group has Latin Square Property
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Then $G$ satisfies the Latin square property. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a unique $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a unique $h \in G$ such that $h \circ a = b$.
We shall prove that this is true for the first equation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = b | r = a \circ g }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a^{-1} \circ b | r = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ g} | c = {{Group-axiom|3}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {a^{-1} \circ a} \circ g | c = {{Group-axiom|1}} }} {{eqn | ...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Then $G$ satisfies the [[Definition:Latin Square Property|Latin square property]]. That is, for all $a, b \in G$, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $g \in G$ such that $a \circ g = b$. Similarly, there exists a [[Definition:Unique|unique]] $h \in G$...
We shall prove that this is true for the first equation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = b | r = a \circ g }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = a^{-1} \circ b | r = a^{-1} \circ \paren {a \circ g} | c = {{Group-axiom|3}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {a^{-1} \circ a} \circ g | c = {{Group-axiom|1}} }} {{eqn ...
Group has Latin Square Property/Proof 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_has_Latin_Square_Property/Proof_4
[ "Group has Latin Square Property", "Latin Square Property", "Latin Squares", "Group Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Latin Square Property", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Unique" ]
[]
proofwiki-277
Symmetric Difference is Commutative
Symmetric difference is commutative: :$S \symdif T = T \symdif S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \symdif T | r = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {T \setminus S} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {T \setminus S} \cup \paren {S \setminus T} | c = Union is Commutative }} {{eqn | r = T \symdif S | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference}} }} {{en...
[[Definition:Symmetric Difference|Symmetric difference]] is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$S \symdif T = T \symdif S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \symdif T | r = \paren {S \setminus T} \cup \paren {T \setminus S} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {T \setminus S} \cup \paren {S \setminus T} | c = [[Union is Commutative]] }} {{eqn | r = T \symdif S | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference}} }} ...
Symmetric Difference is Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_is_Commutative
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Commutative Laws of Set Theory", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Union is Commutative" ]
proofwiki-278
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets. {{TFAE|def = Symmetric Difference|view = symmetric difference $S \symdif T$ between $S$ and $T$}} === Definition 1 === {{:Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 1}} === Definition 2 === {{:Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 2}} === Definition 3 === {{:Definition:Symmetric Difference...
=== $(1)$ iff $(2)$ === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(1) iff (2)}} {{qed|lemma}}
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. {{TFAE|def = Symmetric Difference|view = symmetric difference $S \symdif T$ between $S$ and $T$}} === [[Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 1|Definition 1]] === {{:Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 1}} === [[Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 2|Defin...
=== [[Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(1) iff (2)|$(1)$ iff $(2)$]] === {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(1) iff (2)}} {{qed|lemma}}
Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Difference
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Symmetric_Difference
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference", "Symmetric Difference", "Set Difference", "Set Intersection", "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 1", "Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 2", "Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 3", "Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 4", "Definition:Symmetric Difference/Definition 5" ]
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Symmetric Difference/(1) iff (2)" ]
proofwiki-279
Symmetric Difference of Equal Sets
The symmetric difference of two equal sets is the empty set: :$S = T \iff S \symdif T = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S = T | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = S \subseteq T \land T \subseteq S | c = {{Defof|Set Equality}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \paren {S \setminus T = \O} \land \paren {T \setminus S = \O} | c = Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set }} {{eqn | o = \lead...
The [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]] of two [[Definition:Set Equality|equal sets]] is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$S = T \iff S \symdif T = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S = T | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = S \subseteq T \land T \subseteq S | c = {{Defof|Set Equality}} }} {{eqn | o = \leadstoandfrom | r = \paren {S \setminus T = \O} \land \paren {T \setminus S = \O} | c = [[Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set]] }} {{eqn | o = \...
Symmetric Difference of Equal Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_of_Equal_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_of_Equal_Sets
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Empty Set", "Set Equality" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Set Equality", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set", "Union is Empty iff Sets are Empty" ]
proofwiki-280
Union is Empty iff Sets are Empty
If the union of two sets is the empty set, then both are themselves empty: :$S \cup T = \O \iff S = \O \land T = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = S \cup T = \O | o = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | q = \neg \exists x | r = x \in \paren {S \cup T} | c = {{Defof|Empty Set}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | q = \forall x | r = \neg \paren {x \in \paren {S \cup T} } | c =...
If the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]], then both are themselves [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]: :$S \cup T = \O \iff S = \O \land T = \O$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | r = S \cup T = \O | o = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | q = \neg \exists x | r = x \in \paren {S \cup T} | c = {{Defof|Empty Set}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | o = | q = \forall x | r = \neg \paren {x \in \paren {S \cup T} } | c =...
Union is Empty iff Sets are Empty/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_is_Empty_iff_Sets_are_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_is_Empty_iff_Sets_are_Empty/Proof_1
[ "Union is Empty iff Sets are Empty", "Set Union", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "De Morgan's Laws (Predicate Logic)", "De Morgan's Laws (Logic)/Conjunction of Negations" ]
proofwiki-281
Union is Empty iff Sets are Empty
If the union of two sets is the empty set, then both are themselves empty: :$S \cup T = \O \iff S = \O \land T = \O$
Let $S \cup T = \O$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S \cup T | c = Set is Subset of Union }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = \O | c = {{hypothesis}} }} {{end-eqn}} From Empty Set is Subset of All Sets: :$\O \subseteq S$ So it follo...
If the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]], then both are themselves [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]: :$S \cup T = \O \iff S = \O \land T = \O$
Let $S \cup T = \O$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = S \cup T | c = [[Set is Subset of Union]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = \O | c = {{hypothesis}} }} {{end-eqn}} From [[Empty Set is Subset of All Sets]]: :$\O \subseteq S$ ...
Union is Empty iff Sets are Empty/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_is_Empty_iff_Sets_are_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_is_Empty_iff_Sets_are_Empty/Proof_2
[ "Union is Empty iff Sets are Empty", "Set Union", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Union", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets", "Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2" ]
proofwiki-282
Symmetric Difference with Empty Set
:$S \symdif \O = S$ where $\symdif$ denotes the symmetric difference.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \symdif \O | r = \paren {S \cup \O} \setminus \paren {S \cap \O} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = S \setminus \paren {S \cap \O} | c = Union with Empty Set }} {{eqn | r = S \setminus \O | c = Intersection with Empty Set }} {{eqn | r = S ...
:$S \symdif \O = S$ where $\symdif$ denotes the [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \symdif \O | r = \paren {S \cup \O} \setminus \paren {S \cap \O} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = S \setminus \paren {S \cap \O} | c = [[Union with Empty Set]] }} {{eqn | r = S \setminus \O | c = [[Intersection with Empty Set]] }} {{eqn | ...
Symmetric Difference with Empty Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Empty_Set
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Difference" ]
[ "Union with Empty Set", "Intersection with Empty Set", "Set Difference with Empty Set is Self" ]
proofwiki-283
Intersection Distributes over Symmetric Difference
Intersection is distributive over symmetric difference: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \symdif S} \cap T | r = \paren {R \cap T} \symdif \paren {S \cap T} }} {{eqn | l = T \cap \paren {R \symdif S} | r = \paren {T \cap R} \symdif \paren {T \cap S} }} {{end-eqn}}
From Set Intersection Distributes over Set Difference, we have: :$\paren {R \setminus S} \cap T = \paren {R \cap T} \setminus \paren {S \cap T}$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \cap T} \symdif \paren {S \cap T} | r = \paren {\paren {R \cap T} \setminus \paren {S \cap T} } \cup \paren {\paren {S \cap T} \s...
[[Definition:Set Intersection|Intersection]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \symdif S} \cap T | r = \paren {R \cap T} \symdif \paren {S \cap T} }} {{eqn | l = T \cap \paren {R \symdif S} ...
From [[Set Intersection Distributes over Set Difference]], we have: :$\paren {R \setminus S} \cap T = \paren {R \cap T} \setminus \paren {S \cap T}$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \cap T} \symdif \paren {S \cap T} | r = \paren {\paren {R \cap T} \setminus \paren {S \cap T} } \cup \paren {\paren {S \ca...
Intersection Distributes over Symmetric Difference
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_Distributes_over_Symmetric_Difference
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_Distributes_over_Symmetric_Difference
[ "Set Intersection", "Symmetric Difference", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Symmetric Difference" ]
[ "Set Intersection Distributes over Set Difference", "Set Intersection Distributes over Set Difference", "Intersection Distributes over Union", "Intersection is Commutative" ]
proofwiki-284
Symmetric Difference of Unions
Let $R$, $S$ and $T$ be sets. Then: :$\paren {R \cup T} \symdif \paren {S \cup T} = \paren {R \symdif S} \setminus T$ where: :$\symdif$ denotes the symmetric difference :$\setminus$ denotes set difference :$\cup$ denotes set union
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \cup T} \symdif \paren {S \cup T} | r = \paren {\paren {R \cup T} \setminus \paren {S \cup T} } \cup \paren {\paren {S \cup T} \setminus \paren {R \cup T} } | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 1}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\paren {R \setminus S} \setminus T} \cup \par...
Let $R$, $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Then: :$\paren {R \cup T} \symdif \paren {S \cup T} = \paren {R \symdif S} \setminus T$ where: :$\symdif$ denotes the [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]] :$\setminus$ denotes [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]] :$\cup$ denotes [[Definition:...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {R \cup T} \symdif \paren {S \cup T} | r = \paren {\paren {R \cup T} \setminus \paren {S \cup T} } \cup \paren {\paren {S \cup T} \setminus \paren {R \cup T} } | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 1}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\paren {R \setminus S} \setminus T} \cup \par...
Symmetric Difference of Unions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_of_Unions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_of_Unions
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Set Union" ]
[ "Set Difference with Union", "Set Difference is Right Distributive over Union", "Category:Symmetric Difference", "Category:Set Union" ]
proofwiki-285
Intersection with Universal Set
The intersection of a set with the universal set is the set itself: :$\mathbb U \cap S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = \mathbb U | c = {{Defof|Universal Set}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \mathbb U \cap S | r = S | c = Intersection with Subset is Subset }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] with the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]] is the set itself: :$\mathbb U \cap S = S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = \mathbb U | c = {{Defof|Universal Set}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \mathbb U \cap S | r = S | c = [[Intersection with Subset is Subset]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Intersection with Universal Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Universal_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Universal_Set
[ "Universal Set", "Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
[ "Intersection with Subset is Subset" ]
proofwiki-286
Union with Universal Set
The union of a set with the universal set is the universal set: :$\mathbb U \cup S = \mathbb U$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = \mathbb U | c = {{Defof|Universal Set}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \mathbb U \cup S | r = \mathbb U | c = Union with Superset is Superset }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] with the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]] is the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]: :$\mathbb U \cup S = \mathbb U$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S | o = \subseteq | r = \mathbb U | c = {{Defof|Universal Set}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \mathbb U \cup S | r = \mathbb U | c = [[Union with Superset is Superset]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Union with Universal Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Universal_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Universal_Set
[ "Universal Set", "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Universal Set", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
[ "Union with Superset is Superset" ]
proofwiki-287
Complement of Empty Set is Universal Set
The complement of the empty set is the universal set: :$\map \complement \O = \mathbb U$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ in $\relcomp S \O = S$ from Relative Complement of Empty Set. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] of the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] is the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]: :$\map \complement \O = \mathbb U$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ in $\relcomp S \O = S$ from [[Relative Complement of Empty Set]]. {{qed}}
Complement of Empty Set is Universal Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Empty_Set_is_Universal_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Empty_Set_is_Universal_Set
[ "Set Complement", "Empty Set", "Universal Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
[ "Relative Complement of Empty Set" ]
proofwiki-288
Complement of Universal Set is Empty Set
The complement of the universal set is the empty set: :$\map \complement {\mathbb U} = \O$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ in $\relcomp S S = \O$ from Relative Complement with Self is Empty Set. {{Qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] of the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]] is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$\map \complement {\mathbb U} = \O$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ in $\relcomp S S = \O$ from [[Relative Complement with Self is Empty Set]]. {{Qed}}
Complement of Universal Set is Empty Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Universal_Set_is_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Universal_Set_is_Empty_Set
[ "Set Complement", "Universal Set", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Universal Set", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Relative Complement with Self is Empty Set" ]
proofwiki-289
Complement of Complement
The complement of the complement of a set is the set itself: :$\map \complement {\map \complement S} = S$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ and $S$ for $T$ in $\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = T$ from Relative Complement of Relative Complement. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] of the [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] is the set itself: :$\map \complement {\map \complement S} = S$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ and $S$ for $T$ in $\relcomp S {\relcomp S T} = T$ from [[Relative Complement of Relative Complement]]. {{qed}}
Complement of Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complement_of_Complement
[ "Set Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Relative Complement of Relative Complement" ]
proofwiki-290
Intersection with Complement
The intersection of a set and its complement is the empty set: :$S \cap \map \complement S = \O$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ and $S$ for $T$ in $T \cap \relcomp S T = \O$ from Intersection with Relative Complement is Empty. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] and its [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$S \cap \map \complement S = \O$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ and $S$ for $T$ in $T \cap \relcomp S T = \O$ from [[Intersection with Relative Complement is Empty]]. {{qed}}
Intersection with Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_with_Complement
[ "Set Complement", "Set Intersection", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Intersection with Relative Complement is Empty" ]
proofwiki-291
Union with Complement
The union of a set and its complement is the universal set: :$S \cup \map \complement S = \mathbb U$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ and $S$ for $T$ in $T \cup \relcomp S T = S$ from Union with Relative Complement. {{qed}} {{LEM|Union with Relative Complement}}
The [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] and its [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] is the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]: :$S \cup \map \complement S = \mathbb U$
Substitute $\mathbb U$ for $S$ and $S$ for $T$ in $T \cup \relcomp S T = S$ from [[Union with Relative Complement]]. {{qed}} {{LEM|Union with Relative Complement}}
Union with Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_with_Complement
[ "Set Union", "Set Complement", "Universal Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
[ "Union with Relative Complement" ]
proofwiki-292
Set with Complement forms Partition
Let $\O \subset S \subset \mathbb U$. Then $S$ and its complement $\map \complement S$ form a partition of the universal set $\mathbb U$.
Follows directly from Set with Relative Complement forms Partition: If $\O \subset T \subset S$, then $\set {T, \relcomp S T}$ is a partition of $S$. {{Qed}} Category:Set Complement Category:Universal Set Category:Set Partitions 6sxbs5qe78y1wegwid1kahz3yitbtoj
Let $\O \subset S \subset \mathbb U$. Then $S$ and its [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] $\map \complement S$ form a [[Definition:Set Partition|partition]] of the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]] $\mathbb U$.
Follows directly from [[Set with Relative Complement forms Partition]]: If $\O \subset T \subset S$, then $\set {T, \relcomp S T}$ is a [[Definition:Set Partition|partition]] of $S$. {{Qed}} [[Category:Set Complement]] [[Category:Universal Set]] [[Category:Set Partitions]] 6sxbs5qe78y1wegwid1kahz3yitbtoj
Set with Complement forms Partition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_with_Complement_forms_Partition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_with_Complement_forms_Partition
[ "Set Complement", "Universal Set", "Set Partitions" ]
[ "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Set Partition", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
[ "Set Difference and Intersection form Partition/Corollary 2", "Definition:Set Partition", "Category:Set Complement", "Category:Universal Set", "Category:Set Partitions" ]
proofwiki-293
Set Difference as Intersection with Complement
Set difference can be expressed as the intersection with the set complement: :$A \setminus B = A \cap \map \complement B$
This follows directly from Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement: :$A \setminus B = A \cap \relcomp S B$ Let $S = \Bbb U$. Since $A, B \subseteq \Bbb U$ by definition of the universal set, the result follows. {{qed}}
[[Definition:Set Difference|Set difference]] can be expressed as the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] with the [[Definition:Set Complement|set complement]]: :$A \setminus B = A \cap \map \complement B$
This follows directly from [[Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement]]: :$A \setminus B = A \cap \relcomp S B$ Let $S = \Bbb U$. Since $A, B \subseteq \Bbb U$ by definition of [[Definition:Universal Set|the universal set]], the result follows. {{qed}}
Set Difference as Intersection with Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_as_Intersection_with_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_as_Intersection_with_Complement
[ "Set Complement", "Set Difference", "Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Complement" ]
[ "Set Difference as Intersection with Relative Complement", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
proofwiki-294
Set Difference of Complements
:$\map \complement S \setminus \map \complement T = T \setminus S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \complement S \setminus \map \complement T | r = \set {x: x \in \map \complement S \land x \notin \map \complement T} | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: x \notin S \land x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Set Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: x \in T \land x \...
:$\map \complement S \setminus \map \complement T = T \setminus S$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \complement S \setminus \map \complement T | r = \set {x: x \in \map \complement S \land x \notin \map \complement T} | c = {{Defof|Set Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: x \notin S \land x \in T} | c = {{Defof|Set Complement}} }} {{eqn | r = \set {x: x \in T \land x \...
Set Difference of Complements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_of_Complements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Difference_of_Complements
[ "Set Difference", "Set Complement" ]
[]
[ "Rule of Commutation", "Category:Set Difference", "Category:Set Complement" ]
proofwiki-295
Symmetric Difference of Complements
The symmetric difference of two sets equals the symmetric difference of their complements: :$\map \complement S \symdif \map \complement T = S \symdif T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \complement S \symdif \map \complement T | r = \paren {\map \complement S \setminus \map \complement T} \cup \paren {\map \complement T \setminus \map \complement S} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {T \setminus S} \cup \paren {S \setminus T} | ...
The [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]] of two [[Definition:Set|sets]] equals the [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]] of their [[Definition:Set Complement|complements]]: :$\map \complement S \symdif \map \complement T = S \symdif T$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \complement S \symdif \map \complement T | r = \paren {\map \complement S \setminus \map \complement T} \cup \paren {\map \complement T \setminus \map \complement S} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {T \setminus S} \cup \paren {S \setminus T} | ...
Symmetric Difference of Complements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_of_Complements
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_of_Complements
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Set Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Set Complement" ]
[ "Set Difference of Complements" ]
proofwiki-296
Symmetric Difference with Universal Set
:$\mathbb U \symdif S = \map \complement S$ where: :$\mathbb U$ denotes the universal set :$\symdif$ denotes symmetric difference.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbb U \symdif S | r = \mathbb U \cup S \setminus \mathbb U \cap S | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbb U \cup S \setminus S | c = Intersection with Universal Set }} {{eqn | r = \mathbb U \setminus S | c = Union with Universal Set }} ...
:$\mathbb U \symdif S = \map \complement S$ where: :$\mathbb U$ denotes the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]] :$\symdif$ denotes [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbb U \symdif S | r = \mathbb U \cup S \setminus \mathbb U \cap S | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbb U \cup S \setminus S | c = [[Intersection with Universal Set]] }} {{eqn | r = \mathbb U \setminus S | c = [[Union with Universal S...
Symmetric Difference with Universal Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Universal_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Universal_Set
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Universal Set", "Set Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Universal Set", "Definition:Symmetric Difference" ]
[ "Intersection with Universal Set", "Union with Universal Set" ]
proofwiki-297
Symmetric Difference with Self is Empty Set
The symmetric difference of a set with itself is the empty set: :$S \symdif S = \O$
This follows directly from Symmetric Difference of Equal Sets: :$S \symdif T = \O \iff S = T$ substituting $S$ for $T$. {{Qed}}
The [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] with itself is the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]: :$S \symdif S = \O$
This follows directly from [[Symmetric Difference of Equal Sets]]: :$S \symdif T = \O \iff S = T$ substituting $S$ for $T$. {{Qed}}
Symmetric Difference with Self is Empty Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Self_is_Empty_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Self_is_Empty_Set
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Empty Set" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set" ]
[ "Symmetric Difference of Equal Sets" ]
proofwiki-298
Symmetric Difference with Complement
The symmetric difference of a set with its complement is the universal set: :$S \symdif \relcomp {} S = \mathbb U$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \symdif \relcomp {} S | r = \paren {S \cup \relcomp {} S} \setminus \paren {S \cap \relcomp {} S} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {S \cup \relcomp {} S} \setminus \O | c = Intersection with Complement }} {{eqn | r = \mathbb U \setminus \...
The [[Definition:Symmetric Difference|symmetric difference]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] with its [[Definition:Set Complement|complement]] is the [[Definition:Universal Set|universal set]]: :$S \symdif \relcomp {} S = \mathbb U$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = S \symdif \relcomp {} S | r = \paren {S \cup \relcomp {} S} \setminus \paren {S \cap \relcomp {} S} | c = {{Defof|Symmetric Difference|index = 2}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {S \cup \relcomp {} S} \setminus \O | c = [[Intersection with Complement]] }} {{eqn | r = \mathbb U \setmin...
Symmetric Difference with Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_with_Complement
[ "Symmetric Difference", "Set Complement", "Universal Set" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Complement", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
[ "Intersection with Complement", "Union with Complement", "Set Difference with Empty Set is Self" ]
proofwiki-299
Symmetric Difference is Associative
Symmetric difference is associative: :$R \symdif \paren {S \symdif T} = \paren {R \symdif S} \symdif T$
We can directly expand the expressions for $R \symdif \paren {S \symdif T}$ and $\paren {R \symdif S} \symdif T$, and see that they come to the same thing. Expanding the {{RHS}}: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \paren {R \symdif S} \symdif T | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\paren {\paren {R \cap \overline S}...
[[Definition:Symmetric Difference|Symmetric difference]] is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$R \symdif \paren {S \symdif T} = \paren {R \symdif S} \symdif T$
We can directly expand the expressions for $R \symdif \paren {S \symdif T}$ and $\paren {R \symdif S} \symdif T$, and see that they come to the same thing. Expanding the {{RHS}}: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | o = | r = \paren {R \symdif S} \symdif T | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\paren {\paren {R \cap \overline ...
Symmetric Difference is Associative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Symmetric_Difference_is_Associative/Proof_1
[ "Symmetric Difference is Associative", "Symmetric Difference", "Associative Laws of Set Theory", "Examples of Associative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Intersection Distributes over Union", "De Morgan's Laws (Set Theory)/Set Complement/Complement of Intersection", "De Morgan's Laws (Set Theory)/Set Complement/Complement of Union", "Intersection Distributes over Union", "Intersection Distributes over Union", "De Morgan's Laws (Set Theory)/Set Complement/...