id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-22400
Category of Semilattices is Category
Let $\mathbf{SLat}$ denote the category of semilattices. Then: :$\mathbf{SLat}$ is a metacategory
Let us verify the axioms $(\text C 1)$ up to $(\text C 3)$ for a metacategory. For any two semilattice homomorphisms their composition (in the usual set theoretic sense) is again a semilattice homomorphism by Composite Semilattice Homomorphisms is Semilattice Homomorphism. For any semilattice $\struct{S, \circ}$, we ha...
Let $\mathbf{SLat}$ denote the [[Definition:Category of Semilattices|category of semilattices]]. Then: :$\mathbf{SLat}$ is a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]
Let us verify the axioms $(\text C 1)$ up to $(\text C 3)$ for a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. For any two [[Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism|semilattice homomorphisms]] their [[Definition:Composition of Mappings|composition]] (in the usual [[Definition:Set Theory|set theoretic]] sense) is again a [[De...
Category of Semilattices is Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Semilattices_is_Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Semilattices_is_Category
[ "Category of Semilattices" ]
[ "Definition:Category of Semilattices", "Definition:Metacategory" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Set Theory", "Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism", "Composite Semilattice Homomorphisms is Semilattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Semilattice", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Identit...
proofwiki-22401
Composite Semilattice Homomorphisms is Semilattice Homomorphism
Let $S_1 = \struct{A_1, \circ_1}$, $S_2 = \struct{A_2, \circ_2}$ and $S_3 = \struct{A_3, \circ_3}$ be semilattices. Let $\phi_1: S_1 \to S_2$ and $\phi_2: S_2 \to S_3$ be semilattice homomorphisms. Let $\phi_2 \circ \phi_1 : A_1 \to A_3$ be the composite mapping of $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ Then: :$\phi_2 \circ \phi_1$ i...
Follows immediately from Composite of Homomorphisms is Homomorphism {{qed}} Category:Semilattice Homomorphisms 1et9giqbcjvdauvmpsn69utj7xxx85j
Let $S_1 = \struct{A_1, \circ_1}$, $S_2 = \struct{A_2, \circ_2}$ and $S_3 = \struct{A_3, \circ_3}$ be [[Definition:Semilattice|semilattices]]. Let $\phi_1: S_1 \to S_2$ and $\phi_2: S_2 \to S_3$ be [[Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism|semilattice homomorphisms]]. Let $\phi_2 \circ \phi_1 : A_1 \to A_3$ be the [[Def...
Follows immediately from [[Composite of Homomorphisms is Homomorphism]] {{qed}} [[Category:Semilattice Homomorphisms]] 1et9giqbcjvdauvmpsn69utj7xxx85j
Composite Semilattice Homomorphisms is Semilattice Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_Semilattice_Homomorphisms_is_Semilattice_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_Semilattice_Homomorphisms_is_Semilattice_Homomorphism
[ "Semilattice Homomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Semilattice", "Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism" ]
[ "Composite of Homomorphisms is Homomorphism", "Category:Semilattice Homomorphisms" ]
proofwiki-22402
Identity Mapping is Semilattice Homomorphism
Let $S = \struct{A, \circ}$ be a semilattice. Let $\operatorname{id}_A$ denote the identity mapping on $A$. Then: :$\operatorname{id}_A$ is a semilattice homomorphism of $S$ to $S$
Follows immediately from Identity Mapping is Automorphism. {{qed}} Category:Semilattice Homomorphisms npgqu71tccimkqe5gc43a4q5ky38tmm
Let $S = \struct{A, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Semilattice|semilattice]]. Let $\operatorname{id}_A$ denote the [[Definition:Identity Mapping|identity mapping]] on $A$. Then: :$\operatorname{id}_A$ is a [[Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism|semilattice homomorphism]] of $S$ to $S$
Follows immediately from [[Identity Mapping is Automorphism]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Semilattice Homomorphisms]] npgqu71tccimkqe5gc43a4q5ky38tmm
Identity Mapping is Semilattice Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Mapping_is_Semilattice_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Mapping_is_Semilattice_Homomorphism
[ "Semilattice Homomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Semilattice", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Semilattice Homomorphism" ]
[ "Identity Mapping is Automorphism", "Category:Semilattice Homomorphisms" ]
proofwiki-22403
Scalene Triangle Tessellates the Plane
Let $T$ be a triangle, which can be any shape at all, even scalene. Then $T$ can tessellate the plane.
By placing $2$ copies of $T$ together so their corresponding sides coincide, it is possible to form a quadrilateral. The result follows from Quadrilateral Tessellates the Plane. {{qed}}
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangle]], which can be any shape at all, even [[Definition:Scalene Triangle|scalene]]. Then $T$ can [[Definition:Tessellation|tessellate]] [[Definition:The Plane|the plane]].
By placing $2$ copies of $T$ together so their corresponding [[Definition:Side of Polygon|sides]] coincide, it is possible to form a [[Definition:Quadrilateral|quadrilateral]]. The result follows from [[Quadrilateral Tessellates the Plane]]. {{qed}}
Scalene Triangle Tessellates the Plane
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalene_Triangle_Tessellates_the_Plane
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalene_Triangle_Tessellates_the_Plane
[ "Scalene Triangles", "Tessellations" ]
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)/Scalene", "Definition:Tessellation", "Definition:Plane Surface/The Plane" ]
[ "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Quadrilateral", "Quadrilateral Tessellates the Plane" ]
proofwiki-22404
Surface Area of Torus/Formulation 1
Let $\TT$ be a torus. Let $r$ be the radius of the generating circle of $\TT$. Let $R$ be the distance of the center of the generating circle from the axis of revolution of $\TT$. Then the area $\AA$ of $\TT$ is given by: :$\AA = 4 \pi^2 r R$
Recall Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Surface Area: {{:Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Surface Area}} In this context: :$C$ is the generating circle of $\TT$, which has radius $r$ :the centroid of $C$ is the center of $C$, which is at a distance $R$ from the axis of revolution. From Perimeter of Circle, the perimeter of $...
Let $\TT$ be a [[Definition:Torus (Geometry)|torus]]. Let $r$ be the [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] of the [[Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution|generating]] [[Definition:Circle|circle]] of $\TT$. Let $R$ be the [[Definition:Perpendicular Distance between Point and Straight Line|distance]] of...
Recall [[Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Surface Area]]: {{:Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Surface Area}} In this context: :$C$ is the [[Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution|generating]] [[Definition:Circle|circle]] of $\TT$, which has [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius $r$]] :the [[Definition:Centroi...
Surface Area of Torus/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Surface_Area_of_Torus/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Surface_Area_of_Torus/Formulation_1
[ "Surface Area of Torus" ]
[ "Definition:Torus (Geometry)", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Perpendicular Distance between Point and Straight Line", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution", "Definition:C...
[ "Second Pappus-Guldinus Theorem", "Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Centroid", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Perpendicular Distance between Point and Straight Line", "Definition:Axis of Revolution", "Perimet...
proofwiki-22405
Volume of Torus/Formulation 1
Let $\TT$ be a torus. Let $r$ be the radius of the generating circle of $\TT$. Let $R$ be the distance of the center of the generating circle from the axis of revolution of $\TT$. Then the volume $\VV$ enclosed by $\TT$ is given by: :$\VV = 2 \pi^2 r^2 R$
Recall Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Volume: {{:Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Volume}} In this context: :$C$ is the generating circle of $\TT$, which has radius $r$ :the centroid of $C$ is the center of $C$, which is at a distance $R$ from the axis of revolution. From Area of Circle, the area of $C$ is $\pi r^2$. From ...
Let $\TT$ be a [[Definition:Torus (Geometry)|torus]]. Let $r$ be the [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] of the [[Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution|generating]] [[Definition:Circle|circle]] of $\TT$. Let $R$ be the [[Definition:Perpendicular Distance between Point and Straight Line|distance]] of...
Recall [[Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Volume]]: {{:Pappus's Centroid Theorem for Volume}} In this context: :$C$ is the [[Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution|generating]] [[Definition:Circle|circle]] of $\TT$, which has [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius $r$]] :the [[Definition:Centroid|centroid]]...
Volume of Torus/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Torus/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Torus/Formulation_1
[ "Volume of Torus" ]
[ "Definition:Torus (Geometry)", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Perpendicular Distance between Point and Straight Line", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution", "Definition:C...
[ "First Pappus-Guldinus Theorem", "Definition:Generating Curve of Surface of Revolution", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Centroid", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Perpendicular Distance between Point and Straight Line", "Definition:Axis of Revolution", "Area of ...
proofwiki-22406
Equivalence of Definitions of Embedding of Categories
Let $\mathbf C$ and $\mathbf D$ be categories. Let $F : \mathbf C \to \mathbf D$ be a functor. {{TFAE|def=Embedding of Categories}} === Definition 1 === {{:Definition:Embedding of Categories/Definition 1}} === Definition 2 === {{:Definition:Embedding of Categories/Definition 2}} === Definition 3 === {{:Definition:Embed...
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Embeddings of Categories masz0f4irqjpkki8dub7whs14e559da
Let $\mathbf C$ and $\mathbf D$ be [[Definition:Category|categories]]. Let $F : \mathbf C \to \mathbf D$ be a [[Definition:Functor|functor]]. {{TFAE|def=Embedding of Categories}} === [[Definition:Embedding of Categories/Definition 1|Definition 1]] === {{:Definition:Embedding of Categories/Definition 1}} === [[Defin...
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Embeddings of Categories]] masz0f4irqjpkki8dub7whs14e559da
Equivalence of Definitions of Embedding of Categories
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Embedding_of_Categories
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Embedding_of_Categories
[ "Embeddings of Categories" ]
[ "Definition:Category", "Definition:Functor", "Definition:Embedding of Categories/Definition 1", "Definition:Embedding of Categories/Definition 2", "Definition:Embedding of Categories/Definition 3" ]
[ "Category:Embeddings of Categories" ]
proofwiki-22407
Transpose of Column Matrix is Row Matrix
Let $\mathbf x = \sqbrk x_{1 n} = \begin {bmatrix} x_1 & x_2 & \cdots & x_n \end {bmatrix}$ be a column matrix. Then $\mathbf x^\intercal$, the transpose of $\mathbf x$, is a row matrix: :$\begin {bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ \vdots \\ x_n \end{bmatrix}^\intercal = \begin {bmatrix} x_1 & x_2 & \cdots & x_n \end {bmatrix}$
Self-evident. {{Qed}}
Let $\mathbf x = \sqbrk x_{1 n} = \begin {bmatrix} x_1 & x_2 & \cdots & x_n \end {bmatrix}$ be a [[Definition:Column Matrix|column matrix]]. Then $\mathbf x^\intercal$, the [[Definition:Transpose of Matrix|transpose]] of $\mathbf x$, is a [[Definition:Row Matrix|row matrix]]: :$\begin {bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ \vdots ...
Self-evident. {{Qed}}
Transpose of Column Matrix is Row Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Transpose_of_Column_Matrix_is_Row_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Transpose_of_Column_Matrix_is_Row_Matrix
[ "Transposes of Matrices", "column Matrices", "Row Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Column Matrix", "Definition:Transpose of Matrix", "Definition:Row Matrix" ]
[]
proofwiki-22408
Cotangent is Cosecant divided by Secant
Let $\theta$ be an angle such that $\sin \theta \ne 0$. Then: :$\cot \theta = \dfrac {\cosec \theta} {\sec \theta}$ where $\cot$, $\cosec$ and $\sec$ mean cotangent, cosecant and secant respectively.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cot \theta | r = \dfrac {\cos \theta} {\sin \theta} | c = Cotangent is Cosine divided by Sine, which holds when $\sin \theta \ne 0$ }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 / \sec \theta} {1 / \cosec \theta} | c = Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine, Cosecant is Reciprocal of Sine }} {{eqn | r =...
Let $\theta$ be an [[Definition:Angle|angle]] such that $\sin \theta \ne 0$. Then: :$\cot \theta = \dfrac {\cosec \theta} {\sec \theta}$ where $\cot$, $\cosec$ and $\sec$ mean [[Definition:Cotangent of Angle|cotangent]], [[Definition:Cosecant of Angle|cosecant]] and [[Definition:Secant of Angle|secant]] respectively.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cot \theta | r = \dfrac {\cos \theta} {\sin \theta} | c = [[Cotangent is Cosine divided by Sine]], which holds when $\sin \theta \ne 0$ }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {1 / \sec \theta} {1 / \cosec \theta} | c = [[Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine]], [[Cosecant is Reciprocal of Sine]] }}...
Cotangent is Cosecant divided by Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cotangent_is_Cosecant_divided_by_Secant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cotangent_is_Cosecant_divided_by_Secant
[ "Secant Function", "Cosecant Function", "Cotangent Function" ]
[ "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Cotangent/Definition from Triangle", "Definition:Cosecant/Definition from Triangle", "Definition:Secant Function/Definition from Triangle" ]
[ "Cotangent is Cosine divided by Sine", "Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine", "Cosecant is Reciprocal of Sine", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-22409
Sine of Obtuse Angle is Positive
Let $\theta$ be an obtuse angle. Then: :$\sin \theta > 0$ where $\sin$ denotes the sine function.
{{ProofWanted|trivial but I don't want to be distracted.}}
Let $\theta$ be an [[Definition:Obtuse Angle|obtuse angle]]. Then: :$\sin \theta > 0$ where $\sin$ denotes the [[Definition:Sine Function|sine function]].
{{ProofWanted|trivial but I don't want to be distracted.}}
Sine of Obtuse Angle is Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Obtuse_Angle_is_Positive
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_of_Obtuse_Angle_is_Positive
[ "Sine Function", "Obtuse Angles" ]
[ "Definition:Obtuse Angle", "Definition:Sine" ]
[]
proofwiki-22410
Cosine of Obtuse Angle is Negative
Let $\theta$ be an obtuse angle. Then: :$\cos \theta < 0$ where $\cos$ denotes the cosine function.
Let $\theta$ be an obtuse angle. By definition of obtuse angle: :$90 \degrees < \theta < 180 \degrees$ Let us align $\theta$ in a Cartesian plane such that: :$\theta$ itself is at the origin :one arm of $\theta$ is aligned with the positive $x$-axis. Then the other arm of $\theta$ is in either the second quadrant or th...
Let $\theta$ be an [[Definition:Obtuse Angle|obtuse angle]]. Then: :$\cos \theta < 0$ where $\cos$ denotes the [[Definition:Cosine Function|cosine function]].
Let $\theta$ be an [[Definition:Obtuse Angle|obtuse angle]]. By definition of [[Definition:Obtuse Angle|obtuse angle]]: :$90 \degrees < \theta < 180 \degrees$ Let us align $\theta$ in a [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|Cartesian plane]] such that: :$\theta$ itself is at the [[Definition:Origin|origin]] :one [[Definition:...
Cosine of Obtuse Angle is Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Obtuse_Angle_is_Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_of_Obtuse_Angle_is_Negative
[ "Cosine Function", "Obtuse Angles" ]
[ "Definition:Obtuse Angle", "Definition:Cosine" ]
[ "Definition:Obtuse Angle", "Definition:Obtuse Angle", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Angle/Arm", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Angle/Arm", "Definition:Cartesian Plane/Quadrants/Second", "Definition:Cart...
proofwiki-22411
Tangent of Obtuse Angle is Negative
Let $\theta$ be an obtuse angle. Then: :$\tan \theta < 0$ where $\tan$ denotes the tangent function.
{{ProofWanted|trivial but I don't want to be distracted.}}
Let $\theta$ be an [[Definition:Obtuse Angle|obtuse angle]]. Then: :$\tan \theta < 0$ where $\tan$ denotes the [[Definition:Tangent Function|tangent function]].
{{ProofWanted|trivial but I don't want to be distracted.}}
Tangent of Obtuse Angle is Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Obtuse_Angle_is_Negative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Obtuse_Angle_is_Negative
[ "Tangent Function", "Obtuse Angles" ]
[ "Definition:Obtuse Angle", "Definition:Tangent Function" ]
[]
proofwiki-22412
Scalar Triple Product as Product of Magnitudes
Let $\mathbf a$, $\mathbf b$ and $\mathbf c$ be vectors in a Cartesian $3$-space: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf a | r = a_i \mathbf i + a_j \mathbf j + a_k \mathbf k }} {{eqn | l = \mathbf b | r = b_i \mathbf i + b_j \mathbf j + b_k \mathbf k }} {{eqn | l = \mathbf c | r = c_i \mathbf i + c_j \mat...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {\mathbf a, \mathbf b, \mathbf c} | r = \mathbf a \cdot \paren {\mathbf b \times \mathbf c} | c = {{Defof|Scalar Triple Product}} }} {{eqn | r = \size {\mathbf a} \size {\mathbf b \times \mathbf c} \cos \alpha | c = {{Defof|Dot Product}} in real Euclidean spac...
Let $\mathbf a$, $\mathbf b$ and $\mathbf c$ be [[Definition:Vector Quantity|vectors]] in a [[Definition:Cartesian 3-Space|Cartesian $3$-space]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf a | r = a_i \mathbf i + a_j \mathbf j + a_k \mathbf k }} {{eqn | l = \mathbf b | r = b_i \mathbf i + b_j \mathbf j + b_k \mathb...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sqbrk {\mathbf a, \mathbf b, \mathbf c} | r = \mathbf a \cdot \paren {\mathbf b \times \mathbf c} | c = {{Defof|Scalar Triple Product}} }} {{eqn | r = \size {\mathbf a} \size {\mathbf b \times \mathbf c} \cos \alpha | c = {{Defof|Dot Product}} in [[Definition:Real E...
Scalar Triple Product as Product of Magnitudes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_Triple_Product_as_Product_of_Magnitudes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_Triple_Product_as_Product_of_Magnitudes
[ "Scalar Triple Product" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Quantity", "Definition:Cartesian 3-Space", "Definition:Standard Ordered Basis/Vector Space", "Definition:Scalar Triple Product", "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Angle" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Real" ]
proofwiki-22413
Velocity of Point in Straight Line
Let $\mathbf v$ be the velocity of a particle $P$ in space. Let $P$ be moving along a straight line $\LL$ whose positive direction has been established. Then the motion of $P$ can be defined by: :$\mathbf v = \dfrac {\d s} {\d t} \mathbf i$ where $\mathbf i$ denotes the unit vector in the positive direction of $\LL$.
We have {{hypothesis}} that $P$ moves along a straight line $\LL$. Then the rate of change of displacement perpendicular to $\LL$ is zero. Let the $\LL$ be embedded in a Cartesian space $\CC$. From the components of velocity vector, we have: :$\mathbf v = \dfrac {\d \mathbf r} {\d t}$ where $\mathbf r$ is the displacem...
Let $\mathbf v$ be the [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] of a [[Definition:Particle|particle]] $P$ in [[Definition:Ordinary Space|space]]. Let $P$ be [[Definition:Motion|moving]] along a [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]] $\LL$ whose [[Definition:Positive Direction|positive direction]] has been established. T...
We have {{hypothesis}} that $P$ [[Definition:Motion|moves]] along a [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]] $\LL$. Then the [[Definition:Rate of Change|rate of change]] of [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]] [[Definition:Perpendicular|perpendicular]] to $\LL$ is [[Definition:Zero Vector|zero]]. Let the $\LL$...
Velocity of Point in Straight Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_of_Point_in_Straight_Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_of_Point_in_Straight_Line
[ "Velocity" ]
[ "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Particle", "Definition:Ordinary Space", "Definition:Motion", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction", "Definition:Motion", "Definition:Unit Vector", "Definition:Axis/Positive Direction" ]
[ "Definition:Motion", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Rate of Change", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular", "Definition:Zero Vector", "Definition:Cartesian Product/Cartesian Space", "Component of Vector/Examples/Velocity", "Definition:Displacement", "Defin...
proofwiki-22414
Draft:Union of Set of Sets is Greatest Element under Subset Relation
Let $M$ be a set. Let $\bigcup M \in M$. Let $(M, \subseteq)$ be the ordered set formed on $M$ by the subset relation (see Subset Relation is Ordering). Then $\bigcup M$ is the greatest set by set inclusion ($M$ corresponds to $\TT$) of $(M, \subseteq)$.
By Set is Subset of Union: :$\forall \paren {N \in M}: N \subseteq \bigcup M$. Therefore, $\bigcup M$ is the greatest element under the subset relation. {{qed}} Category:Set Union t8lxntmh3eyvirjlfrkqmh01w7u7mtb
Let $M$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\bigcup M \in M$. Let $(M, \subseteq)$ be the [[Definition:Ordered Set|ordered set]] formed on $M$ by the [[Definition:Subset Relation|subset relation]] (see [[Subset Relation is Ordering]]). Then $\bigcup M$ is the [[Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion|greatest set by...
By [[Set is Subset of Union/Set of Sets|Set is Subset of Union]]: :$\forall \paren {N \in M}: N \subseteq \bigcup M$. Therefore, $\bigcup M$ is the [[Definition:Greatest Element|greatest element]] under the subset relation. {{qed}} [[Category:Set Union]] t8lxntmh3eyvirjlfrkqmh01w7u7mtb
Draft:Union of Set of Sets is Greatest Element under Subset Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Draft:Union_of_Set_of_Sets_is_Greatest_Element_under_Subset_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Draft:Union_of_Set_of_Sets_is_Greatest_Element_under_Subset_Relation
[ "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Ordered Set", "Definition:Subset Relation", "Subset Relation is Ordering", "Definition:Greatest Set by Set Inclusion" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Union/Set of Sets", "Definition:Greatest Element", "Category:Set Union" ]
proofwiki-22415
Binomial Coefficient over Power Not Greater than Reciprocal of Factorial
Let $r > 0$. Let $k \in \N$ such that $k \le 2r + 1$. Then: :$\dfrac {\dbinom r k} {r^k} \le \dfrac 1 {k!}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac {\binom r k} {r^k} | r = \frac 1 {k !} \cdot \frac {r^{\underline k} } {r^k} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient/Real Numbers|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {k !} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \frac {r - j} r | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}}, {{Defof|Inte...
Let $r > 0$. Let $k \in \N$ such that $k \le 2r + 1$. Then: :$\dfrac {\dbinom r k} {r^k} \le \dfrac 1 {k!}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac {\binom r k} {r^k} | r = \frac 1 {k !} \cdot \frac {r^{\underline k} } {r^k} | c = {{Defof|Binomial Coefficient/Real Numbers|Binomial Coefficient}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {k !} \prod_{j \mathop = 0}^{k - 1} \frac {r - j} r | c = {{Defof|Falling Factorial}}, {{Defof|Inte...
Binomial Coefficient over Power Not Greater than Reciprocal of Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_over_Power_Not_Greater_than_Reciprocal_of_Factorial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Coefficient_over_Power_Not_Greater_than_Reciprocal_of_Factorial
[ "Binomial Coefficients", "Factorials" ]
[]
[ "Absolute Value Function is Completely Multiplicative", "Negative of Absolute Value", "Category:Binomial Coefficients", "Category:Factorials" ]
proofwiki-22416
Exponential Sequence Converges Compactly
For each $n \in \N$, let $f_n : \C \to \C$ be defined as: :$\map {f_n} z = \paren {1 + \dfrac z n}^n$ Then, $\sequence {f_n}$ converges compactly to the complex exponential function.
Let $D$ be a compact subset of $\C$. By definition, $D$ is bounded, so there is some $M \in \R$ such that: :$\forall z \in D: \size z \le M$ Let $\epsilon > 0$ be arbitrary. By definition of the exponential function, there is some $N \in \N$ such that: :$\forall n \ge N: \map \exp M - \paren {1 + \dfrac M n}^n < \epsil...
For each $n \in \N$, let $f_n : \C \to \C$ be defined as: :$\map {f_n} z = \paren {1 + \dfrac z n}^n$ Then, $\sequence {f_n}$ [[Definition:Compact Convergence|converges compactly]] to the [[Definition:Exponential Function/Complex|complex exponential function]].
Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Compact Subset of Complex Plane|compact subset]] of $\C$. By definition, $D$ is [[Definition:Bounded Subset of Complex Plane|bounded]], so there is some $M \in \R$ such that: :$\forall z \in D: \size z \le M$ Let $\epsilon > 0$ be arbitrary. By definition of the [[Definition:Real Exponenti...
Exponential Sequence Converges Compactly
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Sequence_Converges_Compactly
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Sequence_Converges_Compactly
[ "Compact Convergence", "Exponential Function" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Convergence", "Definition:Exponential Function/Complex" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space/Complex", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space/Complex", "Definition:Exponential Function/Real", "Binomial Theorem/Integral Index", "Triangle Inequality/Complex Numbers", "Binomial Coefficient over Power Not Greater than Reciprocal of Factorial", "Binomial Theorem/Inte...
proofwiki-22417
Wald's Equation
Let $\sequence {X_n}_{n \ge 0}$ be a sequence of i.i.d. real-valued random variables. Let $\sequence {\FF_n}_{n \ge 0}$ be the filtration generated by $\sequence {X_i}_{n \ge 0}$, that is: :$\FF_n := \map \sigma {X_0, \ldots, X_n}$ the $\sigma$-algebra generated by $X_0, \ldots ,X_n$. Let $T$ be a stopping time with re...
Let $M,N > 0$. Let $\mathbb I = \closedint {-M} N$. Let $\map {\phi_\mathbb{I} }x := \begin{cases} x & : x \in \mathbb I \\ 0 & : x \notin \mathbb I \end{cases}$. For $n\ge 0$, let: :$X^\mathbb{I}_n := \map {\phi_\mathbb{I} } {X_n}$ :$S^\mathbb{I}_n := X^\mathbb{I}_0 + \cdots + X^\mathbb{I}_n$ :$M^\mathbb{I}_n := S^\ma...
Let $\sequence {X_n}_{n \ge 0}$ be a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] of [[Definition:Independent and Identically Distributed|i.i.d.]] [[Definition:Real-Valued Random Variable|real-valued random variables]]. Let $\sequence {\FF_n}_{n \ge 0}$ be the [[Definition:Filtration of Sigma-Algebra/Discrete Time|filtration]] ge...
Let $M,N > 0$. Let $\mathbb I = \closedint {-M} N$. Let $\map {\phi_\mathbb{I} }x := \begin{cases} x & : x \in \mathbb I \\ 0 & : x \notin \mathbb I \end{cases}$. For $n\ge 0$, let: :$X^\mathbb{I}_n := \map {\phi_\mathbb{I} } {X_n}$ :$S^\mathbb{I}_n := X^\mathbb{I}_0 + \cdots + X^\mathbb{I}_n$ :$M^\mathbb{I}_n := S^...
Wald's Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wald's_Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Wald's_Equation
[ "Stopping Times" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Random Sample (Probability Theory)", "Definition:Random Variable/Real-Valued", "Definition:Filtration of Sigma-Algebra/Discrete Time", "Definition:Sigma-Algebra Generated by Collection of Random Variables", "Definition:Stopping Time/Discrete Time" ]
[ "Definition:Martingale", "Doob's Optional Stopping Theorem/Discrete Time/Martingale", "Monotone Convergence Theorem (Measure Theory)" ]
proofwiki-22418
Convergent Sequences Characterize Metrizable Topology
Let $X$ be a set. Let $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$ be metrizable topologies induced by metrics $d_1$ and $d_2$ respectively. Suppose that: :a sequence $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N} \subseteq X$ converges to $x \in X$ in $\struct {X, d_1}$ {{iff}} it converges to $x$ in $\struct {X, d_2}$. Then $\tau_1 = \tau_2$.
Let $U$ be open in $\struct {X, d_1}$. Then $X \setminus U$ is closed in $\struct {X, d_1}$. That is, from the definition of closedness in a metric space, for each $x \in X \setminus U$ there exists a sequence $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N}$ in $X \setminus U$ converging to $x$ in $\struct {X, d_1}$. By hypothesis, each ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$ be [[Definition:Metrizable Topology|metrizable topologies]] [[Definition:Topology Induced by Metric|induced by]] [[Definition:Metric|metrics]] $d_1$ and $d_2$ respectively. Suppose that: :a [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] $\sequence {x_n}_{n \in \N} \su...
Let $U$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $\struct {X, d_1}$. Then $X \setminus U$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $\struct {X, d_1}$. That is, from the definition of [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closedness in a metric space]], for each $x \in X \setminus U$ there exists a [[D...
Convergent Sequences Characterize Metrizable Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Sequences_Characterize_Metrizable_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Convergent_Sequences_Characterize_Metrizable_Topology
[ "Convergent Sequences (Metric Space)", "Metric Spaces", "Convergent Sequences (Metric Space)" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Metrizable Space", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Metric Space", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence", "Definition:Convergent Sequence", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Category:Metric Spaces", "Catego...
proofwiki-22419
Open Subspace of Polish Space is Polish Space
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a Polish space. Let $d$ be a metric on $X$ that induces $\tau$ and is such that $\struct {X, d}$ is a complete metric space. Let $U \subseteq X$ be open. Let $\tau_U$ be the subspace topology on $U$ induced by $\tau$. Then $\struct {U, \tau_U}$ is a Polish space.
From Subspace of Separable Metric Space is Separable, $\struct {U, \tau_U}$ is separable. Next, we have that $X \setminus U$ is closed in $\struct {X, \tau}$. Define $f : U \to \hointr 0 \infty$ by: :$\map f x = \map d {x, X \setminus U}$ for each $x \in U$. From Point at Distance Zero from Closed Set is Element, we h...
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Polish Space|Polish space]]. Let $d$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric]] on $X$ that [[Definition:Topology Induced by Metric|induces]] $\tau$ and is such that $\struct {X, d}$ is a [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete metric space]]. Let $U \subseteq X$ be [[Defini...
From [[Subspace of Separable Metric Space is Separable]], $\struct {U, \tau_U}$ is [[Definition:Separable Space|separable]]. Next, we have that $X \setminus U$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $\struct {X, \tau}$. Define $f : U \to \hointr 0 \infty$ by: :$\map f x = \map d {x, X \setminus U}$ for ea...
Open Subspace of Polish Space is Polish Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Subspace_of_Polish_Space_is_Polish_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Subspace_of_Polish_Space_is_Polish_Space
[ "Polish Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Polish Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Polish Space" ]
[ "Subspace of Separable Metric Space is Separable", "Definition:Separable Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Point at Distance Zero from Closed Set is Element", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Topology Induced by Metric", "Definition:Complete Me...
proofwiki-22420
Primitive of Arccosine of a x
:$\ds \int \arccos a x \rd x = x \arccos a x - \dfrac 1 a \sqrt {1 - a^2 x^2} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \arccos x \rd x | r = x \arccos x - \sqrt {1 - x^2} + C | c = Primitive of $\arccos x$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \arccos a x \rd x | r = \dfrac 1 a \paren {\paren {a x} \arccos a x - \sqrt {1 - \paren {a x}^2} } + C | c = Primitive of Function of Con...
:$\ds \int \arccos a x \rd x = x \arccos a x - \dfrac 1 a \sqrt {1 - a^2 x^2} + C$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \arccos x \rd x | r = x \arccos x - \sqrt {1 - x^2} + C | c = [[Primitive of Arccosine Function|Primitive of $\arccos x$]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \arccos a x \rd x | r = \dfrac 1 a \paren {\paren {a x} \arccos a x - \sqrt {1 - \paren {a x}^2} } + C ...
Primitive of Arccosine of a x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Arccosine_of_a_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Arccosine_of_a_x
[ "Primitives involving Inverse Cosine Function" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Arccosine Function", "Primitive of Function of Constant Multiple" ]
proofwiki-22421
Sequence of Mappings Converges Pointwise iff Converges at Each Point
Let $D$ be a set. Let $T$ be a topological space. For each $n \in \N$, let $f_n : D \to T$ be a mapping. Let $f : D \to T$ also be a mapping. Then: :$\sequence {f_n}$ converges pointwise to $f$ {{iff}} :for every $x \in D$, $\sequence {\map {f_n} x}$ converges to $\map f x$
Follows from Sequence on Product Space Converges to Point iff Projections Converge to Projections of Point, with: :$I = D$ :$\forall i \in D: T_i = T$ {{qed}}
Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. For each $n \in \N$, let $f_n : D \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $f : D \to T$ also be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Then: :$\sequence {f_n}$ [[Definition:Pointwise Convergence/Topology|conver...
Follows from [[Sequence on Product Space Converges to Point iff Projections Converge to Projections of Point]], with: :$I = D$ :$\forall i \in D: T_i = T$ {{qed}}
Sequence of Mappings Converges Pointwise iff Converges at Each Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Mappings_Converges_Pointwise_iff_Converges_at_Each_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sequence_of_Mappings_Converges_Pointwise_iff_Converges_at_Each_Point
[ "Convergence" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Pointwise Convergence/Topology", "Definition:Convergent Sequence/Topology" ]
[ "Sequence on Product Space Converges to Point iff Projections Converge to Projections of Point" ]
proofwiki-22422
Center of Mass of Uniform Solid Hemisphere
Let $\BB$ be a solid hemisphere of radius $r$ of uniform density. Then the center of mass of $\BB$ is the point $\dfrac {3 r} 8$ from the center of $\BB$ along the radius of $\BB$ perpendicular to the base of $\BB$.
Let $V$ be the volume of $\BB$. Let the density $\map \rho {\mathbf r}$ of $\BB$ be a constant $\rho$. Let $M = \rho V$ be the total mass of $\BB$. Let $\mathbf r$ be a position within $V$. Let the base of the hemisphere lie in the $x y$ plane centered at the origin with all of $\BB$ in the $z \geq 0$ region. Let $\d V...
Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Solid Figure|solid]] [[Definition:Hemisphere|hemisphere]] of [[Definition:Radius of Hemisphere|radius]] $r$ of [[Definition:Uniform Density|uniform density]]. Then the [[Definition:Center of Mass|center of mass]] of $\BB$ is the [[Definition:Point|point]] $\dfrac {3 r} 8$ from the [[Definit...
Let $V$ be the [[Definition:Volume|volume]] of $\BB$. Let the [[Definition:Mass Density|density]] $\map \rho {\mathbf r}$ of $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Constant|constant]] $\rho$. Let $M = \rho V$ be the [[Definition:Mass|total mass]] of $\BB$. Let $\mathbf r$ be a [[Definition:Position Vector|position]] within $V$. L...
Center of Mass of Uniform Solid Hemisphere/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Mass_of_Uniform_Solid_Hemisphere
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Mass_of_Uniform_Solid_Hemisphere/Proof_1
[ "Center of Mass of Uniform Solid Hemisphere", "Centers of Mass", "Hemispheres", "Uniform Density" ]
[ "Definition:Geometric Figure/Three-Dimensional Figure", "Definition:Hemisphere", "Definition:Hemisphere/Radius", "Definition:Uniform Density", "Definition:Center of Mass", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Hemisphere/Center", "Definition:Hemisphere/Radius", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular/Plane"...
[ "Definition:Volume", "Definition:Mass Density", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Position Vector", "Definition:Hemisphere/Base", "Definition:Hemisphere", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Hemisphere/Center", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Region",...
proofwiki-22423
Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be lattices. {{TFAE|def=Lattice Isomorphism}} === Definition 1 === {{:Definition:Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1}} === Definition 2 === {{:Definition:Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 2}}
=== Definition 1 implies Definition 2 === Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a bijective lattice homomorphism. {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1 Implies Definition 2}}{{qed|lemma}}
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]]. {{TFAE|def=Lattice Isomorphism}} === [[Definition:Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1|Definition 1]] === {{:Definition:Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1}} === ...
=== [[Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1 Implies Definition 2|Definition 1 implies Definition 2]] === Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]]. {{:Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1...
Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Lattice_Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Lattice_Isomorphism
[ "Lattice Isomorphisms", "Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 2" ]
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1 Implies Definition 2", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism" ]
proofwiki-22424
Center of Mass of Uniform Circular Arc
Let $\WW$ be a wire of uniform density. Let $\WW$ be bent into the shape of the arc of a circle $\CC$ of radius $r$ subtending an angle of $2 \alpha$ from the center of $\CC$. Then the center of mass of $\WW$ is the point $\dfrac {r \sin \alpha} \alpha$ from the center of $\CC$.
Let $\lambda$ be the linear mass density of the wire. From definition of radian, the total length of the wire is: :$L = 2 \alpha r$ Therefore, the total mass of the wire is: :$M = L \lambda = 2 \alpha r \lambda$ Arrange a coordinate system so that: :the wire is within the $x$-$y$ plane :the center of the circle contain...
Let $\WW$ be a [[Definition:Wire|wire]] of [[Definition:Uniform Density|uniform]] [[Definition:Linear Mass Density|density]]. Let $\WW$ be bent into the shape of the [[Definition:Arc of Circle|arc]] of a [[Definition:Circle|circle]] $\CC$ of [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] $r$ [[Definition:Angle Subtended by Ar...
Let $\lambda$ be the [[Definition:Linear Mass Density|linear mass density]] of the [[Definition:Wire|wire]]. From definition of [[Definition:Radian|radian]], the total [[Definition:Arc Length|length]] of the [[Definition:Wire|wire]] is: :$L = 2 \alpha r$ Therefore, the total [[Definition:Mass|mass]] of the [[Definiti...
Center of Mass of Uniform Circular Arc
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Mass_of_Uniform_Circular_Arc
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Mass_of_Uniform_Circular_Arc
[ "Centers of Mass", "Circles", "Wires", "Uniform Density" ]
[ "Definition:Wire", "Definition:Uniform Density", "Definition:Mass Density/Linear", "Definition:Circle/Arc", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Circle/Arc/Subtend", "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Center of Mass", "Definition:Point", "Defini...
[ "Definition:Mass Density/Linear", "Definition:Wire", "Definition:Angular Measure/Radian", "Definition:Arc Length", "Definition:Wire", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Wire", "Definition:Coordinate System", "Definition:Wire", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:C...
proofwiki-22425
Center of Mass of Uniform Circular Sector
Let $\WW$ be a uniform lamina in the shape of the sector of a circle $\CC$ of radius $r$ of an angle of $2 \alpha$. Then the center of mass of $\PP$ is the point $\dfrac {2 r \sin \alpha} {3 \alpha}$ from the center of $\CC$.
Let the sector have a constant area mass density of $\sigma$. Let $\CC$ lie in the $x$-$y$ plane of a Cartesian coordinate system. Let the center of $\CC$ coincide with the origin. Let the $x$-axis bisect the sector. We have the center of mass equation: :$\ds M \bar {\mathbf r} = \int_V \map \rho {\mathbf r} \mathbf r ...
Let $\WW$ be a [[Definition:Uniform Lamina|uniform lamina]] in the shape of the [[Definition:Sector of Circle|sector]] of a [[Definition:Circle|circle]] $\CC$ of [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] $r$ of an [[Definition:Angle of Sector|angle]] of $2 \alpha$. Then the [[Definition:Center of Mass|center of mass]] of...
Let the [[Definition:Sector of Circle|sector]] have a [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Area Mass Density|area mass density]] of $\sigma$. Let $\CC$ lie in the [[Definition:XY Plane|$x$-$y$ plane]] of a [[Definition:Cartesian Coordinate System|Cartesian coordinate system]]. Let the [[Definition:Center of ...
Center of Mass of Uniform Circular Sector
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Mass_of_Uniform_Circular_Sector
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Center_of_Mass_of_Uniform_Circular_Sector
[ "Centers of Mass", "Sectors of Circles", "Uniform Laminae" ]
[ "Definition:Lamina/Uniform", "Definition:Sector of Circle", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Sector of Circle/Angle", "Definition:Center of Mass", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Circle/Center" ]
[ "Definition:Sector of Circle", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Mass Density/Area", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Cartesian Coordinate System", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Angle Bisector", "Definition:Sector...
proofwiki-22426
Moment of Inertia of Uniform Rectangular Lamina through Midpoint about Perpendicular Axis
Let $\LL$ be a uniform lamina of mass $M$ in the shape of a rectangle whose sides are of length $2 a$ and $2 b$. Let $\AA$ be the straight line through the centroid of $\LL$ perpendicular to $\LL$. Then the moment of inertia $\II$ of $\LL$ about $\AA$ is given by: :$\II = \dfrac {M \paren {a^2 + b^2} } 3$
Let $\AA_a$ be the straight line: :through the centroid of $\LL$ :in the plane of $\LL$ :perpendicular to the side of $\LL$ of length $2 a$. Let $\AA_b$ be the straight line: :through the centroid of $\LL$ :in the plane of $\LL$ :perpendicular to the side of $\LL$ of length $2 b$. Let $\II_a$ be the moment of inertia o...
Let $\LL$ be a [[Definition:Uniform Lamina|uniform lamina]] of [[Definition:Mass|mass]] $M$ in the shape of a [[Definition:Rectangle|rectangle]] whose [[Definition:Side of Polygon|sides]] are of [[Definition:Length (Linear Measure)|length]] $2 a$ and $2 b$. Let $\AA$ be the [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]] t...
Let $\AA_a$ be the [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]]: :through the [[Definition:Centroid of Surface|centroid]] of $\LL$ :in the [[Definition:Plane|plane]] of $\LL$ :[[Definition:Line Perpendicular to Plane|perpendicular]] to the [[Definition:Side of Polygon|side]] of $\LL$ of [[Definition:Length (Linear Measur...
Moment of Inertia of Uniform Rectangular Lamina through Midpoint about Perpendicular Axis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_of_Inertia_of_Uniform_Rectangular_Lamina_through_Midpoint_about_Perpendicular_Axis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_of_Inertia_of_Uniform_Rectangular_Lamina_through_Midpoint_about_Perpendicular_Axis
[ "Moments of Inertia", "Uniform Laminae", "Rectangles" ]
[ "Definition:Lamina/Uniform", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Rectangle", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Centroid/Surface", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular/Plane", "Definition:Moment of Inertia" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Centroid/Surface", "Definition:Plane Surface", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular/Plane", "Definition:Polygon/Side", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Centroid/Surface", "Definition:Plane Surface", "Defi...
proofwiki-22427
Moment of Inertia of Uniform Elliptical Lamina through Midpoint about Perpendicular Axis
Let $\LL$ be a uniform lamina of mass $M$ in the shape of a ellipse whose axes are of length $2 a$ and $2 b$. Let $\AA$ be the straight line through the centroid of $\LL$ perpendicular to $\LL$. Then the moment of inertia $\II$ of $\LL$ about $\AA$ is given by: :$\II = \dfrac {M \paren {a^2 + b^2} } 4$
Let $\AA_a$ be the straight line coinciding with the axis of $\LL$ of length $2 a$. Let $\AA_b$ be the straight line coinciding with the axis of $\LL$ of length $2 b$. Let $\II_a$ be the moment of inertia of $\LL$ about $\AA_a$. Let $\II_b$ be the moment of inertia of $\LL$ about $\AA_b$. We note that $\AA$ is perpendi...
Let $\LL$ be a [[Definition:Uniform Lamina|uniform lamina]] of [[Definition:Mass|mass]] $M$ in the shape of a [[Definition:Ellipse|ellipse]] whose [[Definition:Axis of Ellipse|axes]] are of [[Definition:Length (Linear Measure)|length]] $2 a$ and $2 b$. Let $\AA$ be the [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]] throug...
Let $\AA_a$ be the [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]] coinciding with the [[Definition:Axis of Ellipse|axis]] of $\LL$ of [[Definition:Length (Linear Measure)|length]] $2 a$. Let $\AA_b$ be the [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]] coinciding with the [[Definition:Axis of Ellipse|axis]] of $\LL$ of [[Defi...
Moment of Inertia of Uniform Elliptical Lamina through Midpoint about Perpendicular Axis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_of_Inertia_of_Uniform_Elliptical_Lamina_through_Midpoint_about_Perpendicular_Axis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Moment_of_Inertia_of_Uniform_Elliptical_Lamina_through_Midpoint_about_Perpendicular_Axis
[ "Moments of Inertia", "Uniform Laminae", "Ellipses" ]
[ "Definition:Lamina/Uniform", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Ellipse", "Definition:Ellipse/Axis", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Centroid/Surface", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular/Plane", "Definition:Moment of Inertia" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Ellipse/Axis", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Ellipse/Axis", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Moment of Inertia", "Definition:Moment of Inertia", "Definition:Right Angle/Perpendicular", "M...
proofwiki-22428
Category of Lattices is Category
Let $\mathbf{Lat}$ denote the category of lattices. Then: :$\mathbf{Lat}$ is a metacategory
Let us verify the axioms $(\text C 1)$ up to $(\text C 3)$ for a metacategory. For any two lattice homomorphisms their composition (in the usual set theoretic sense) is again a lattice homomorphism by Composite Lattice Homomorphisms is Lattice Homomorphism. For any lattice $\struct{L, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$, we have t...
Let $\mathbf{Lat}$ denote the [[Definition:Category of Lattices|category of lattices]]. Then: :$\mathbf{Lat}$ is a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]
Let us verify the axioms $(\text C 1)$ up to $(\text C 3)$ for a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. For any two [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphisms]] their [[Definition:Composition of Mappings|composition]] (in the usual [[Definition:Set Theory|set theoretic]] sense) is again a [[Definition...
Category of Lattices is Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Lattices_is_Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Lattices_is_Category
[ "Category of Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Category of Lattices", "Definition:Metacategory" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Set Theory", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Composite Lattice Homomorphisms is Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Identity Map...
proofwiki-22429
Composite Lattice Homomorphisms is Lattice Homomorphism
Let $L_1 = \struct{A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$, $L_2 = \struct{A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ and $L_3 = \struct{A_3, \vee_3, \wedge_3, \preceq_3}$ be lattices. Let $\phi_1: L_1 \to L_2$ and $\phi_2: L_2 \to L_3$ be lattice homomorphisms. Let $\phi_2 \circ \phi_1 : A_1 \to A_3$ be the composite mapping of $\...
Follows immediately from Composite of Homomorphisms is Homomorphism {{qed}} Category:Lattice Homomorphisms om3nw5mtzzsvjroe9k0fllt2g207brh
Let $L_1 = \struct{A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$, $L_2 = \struct{A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ and $L_3 = \struct{A_3, \vee_3, \wedge_3, \preceq_3}$ be [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]]. Let $\phi_1: L_1 \to L_2$ and $\phi_2: L_2 \to L_3$ be [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphis...
Follows immediately from [[Composite of Homomorphisms is Homomorphism]] {{qed}} [[Category:Lattice Homomorphisms]] om3nw5mtzzsvjroe9k0fllt2g207brh
Composite Lattice Homomorphisms is Lattice Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_Lattice_Homomorphisms_is_Lattice_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_Lattice_Homomorphisms_is_Lattice_Homomorphism
[ "Lattice Homomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism" ]
[ "Composite of Homomorphisms is Homomorphism", "Category:Lattice Homomorphisms" ]
proofwiki-22430
Identity Mapping is Lattice Homomorphism
Let $L = \struct{A, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a lattice. Let $\operatorname{id}_A$ denote the identity mapping on $A$. Then: :$\operatorname{id}_A$ is a lattice homomorphism of $L$ to $L$
Follows from Identity Mapping is Automorphism applied to $\struct{A, \vee}$ and $\struct{A, \wedge}$. {{qed}} Category:Lattice Homomorphisms o3t1i1hguvpqxsl9jh1hima14sabg0l
Let $L = \struct{A, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a [[Definition:Lattice|lattice]]. Let $\operatorname{id}_A$ denote the [[Definition:Identity Mapping|identity mapping]] on $A$. Then: :$\operatorname{id}_A$ is a [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]] of $L$ to $L$
Follows from [[Identity Mapping is Automorphism]] applied to $\struct{A, \vee}$ and $\struct{A, \wedge}$. {{qed}} [[Category:Lattice Homomorphisms]] o3t1i1hguvpqxsl9jh1hima14sabg0l
Identity Mapping is Lattice Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Mapping_is_Lattice_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Mapping_is_Lattice_Homomorphism
[ "Lattice Homomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism" ]
[ "Identity Mapping is Automorphism", "Category:Lattice Homomorphisms" ]
proofwiki-22431
Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1 Implies Definition 2
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be lattices. Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a bijective lattice homomorphism. Then: :$\phi : \struct{A_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{A_2, \preceq_2}$ is an order isomorphism by definition.
From Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism: :$\phi^{-1}: L_2 \to L_1$ is a bijective lattice homomorphism. From Lattice Homomorphism is Order-Preserving: :$\phi : \struct{A_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{A_2, \preceq_2}$ and $\phi^{-1} : \struct{A_2, \preceq_2} \to \struct{A_1, \preceq_...
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]]. Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]]. Then: :$\phi : \struct{A_1, \pre...
From [[Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism]]: :$\phi^{-1}: L_2 \to L_1$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]]. From [[Lattice Homomorphism is Order-Preserving]]: :$\phi : \struct{A_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{A_2, \preceq...
Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 1 Implies Definition 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Lattice_Isomorphism/Definition_1_Implies_Definition_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Lattice_Isomorphism/Definition_1_Implies_Definition_2
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Order Isomorphism" ]
[ "Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Lattice Homomorphism is Order-Preserving", "Definition:Increasing", "Definition:Order Isomorphism" ]
proofwiki-22432
Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 2 Implies Definition 1
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be lattices. Let $\phi : \struct{A_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{A_2, \preceq_2}$ be an order isomorphism. Then: :$\phi$ is a bijective lattice homomorphism
By definition of order isomorphism: :$\phi : \struct{A_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{A_2, \preceq_2}$ is an order-preserving bijection Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be the inverse of $\phi : A_1 \to A_2$. From Inverse of Order Isomorphism is Order Isomorphism: :$\phi^{-1} : \struct{A_2, \preceq_2} \to \struct{A_1, \preceq...
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]]. Let $\phi : \struct{A_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{A_2, \preceq_2}$ be an [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]]. Then: :$\phi$ is a [[Definition:...
By definition of [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]]: :$\phi : \struct{A_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{A_2, \preceq_2}$ is an [[Definition:Order-preserving|order-preserving]] [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]] Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be the [[Definition:Inverse Mapping|inverse]] of $\phi : A_1 \to A_...
Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism/Definition 2 Implies Definition 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Lattice_Isomorphism/Definition_2_Implies_Definition_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Lattice_Isomorphism/Definition_2_Implies_Definition_1
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Lattice Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Increasing", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Inverse of Order Isomorphism is Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Order Isomorphism", "Definition:Morphism Property", "Definition:Dual Statement (Order Theory)", "Dual Pairs (Order Theory)",...
proofwiki-22433
Carnot's Theorem
All reversible heat engines operating between the same temperatures are equally efficient.
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot|cat = Carnot, Sadi}}
All [[Definition:Reversible Heat Engine|reversible heat engines]] operating between the same [[Definition:Temperature|temperatures]] are equally [[Definition:Efficiency|efficient]].
{{ProofWanted}} {{Namedfor|Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot|cat = Carnot, Sadi}}
Carnot's Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Carnot's_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Carnot's_Theorem
[ "Thermodynamics" ]
[ "Definition:Reversible Heat Engine", "Definition:Temperature", "Definition:Efficiency" ]
[]
proofwiki-22434
Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be lattices. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a bijective lattice homomorphism. Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be the inverse of $\phi : A_1 \to A_2$. Then: :$\phi^{-1} : L_2 \to L_1$ is a bijective lattice homomorphi...
From Inverse of Bijection is Bijection: :$\phi^{-1}$ is a bijection It remains to show that $\phi^{-1}$ is a lattice homomorphism.
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]]. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]]. Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be t...
From [[Inverse of Bijection is Bijection]]: :$\phi^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]] It remains to show that $\phi^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]].
Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Bijective_Lattice_Homomorphism_is_Bijective_Lattice_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Bijective_Lattice_Homomorphism_is_Bijective_Lattice_Homomorphism
[ "Lattice Homomorphisms", "Bijections" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism" ]
[ "Inverse of Bijection is Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism" ]
proofwiki-22435
Number of Eigenvalues of Square Complex Matrix
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix of order $n$ over the complex numbers $\C$. Then $\mathbf A$ has $n$ eigenvalues.
Let $p_A$ be the characteristic polynomial of $\mathbf A$. By definition, an eigenvalue of $\mathbf A$ is a root of $p_A$. Since Degree of Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix equals Order of Matrix, the degree of $p_A$ is $n$. From the Number of Roots of Polynomial With Complex Coefficients Equals Degree of Polynomial,...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order]] $n$ over the [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]] $\C$. Then $\mathbf A$ has $n$ [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Square Matrix|eigenvalues]].
Let $p_A$ be the [[Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix|characteristic polynomial]] of $\mathbf A$. By definition, an [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Square Matrix|eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf A$ is a [[Definition:Root of Polynomial|root]] of $p_A$. Since [[Degree of Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix equals Order ...
Number of Eigenvalues of Square Complex Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Eigenvalues_of_Square_Complex_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Eigenvalues_of_Square_Complex_Matrix
[ "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices", "Square Matrices", "Complex Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix", "Definition:Root of Polynomial", "Degree of Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix equals Order of Matrix", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Number of Roots of Polynomial With Complex Coefficients Equals Degree of Pol...
proofwiki-22436
Number of Linearly Independent Eigenvectors of Square Complex Matrix
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix of order $n$ over the complex numbers $\C$. Then $\mathbf A$ has no more than $n$ linearly independent eigenvectors.
By the definition of eigenvalue, it is a root of the characteristic polynomial of $\mathbf A$. By Degree of Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix equals Order of Matrix, the degree of the characteristic polynomial is $n$. By Number of Roots of Polynomial With Complex Coefficients Equals Degree of Polynomial, the number o...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Square Matrix|order]] $n$ over the [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]] $\C$. Then $\mathbf A$ has no more than $n$ [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set of Complex Vectors|linearly independent]] [[Definition:Eigenvector ...
By the [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Square Matrix|definition of eigenvalue]], it is a root of the [[Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix|characteristic polynomial]] of $\mathbf A$. By [[Degree of Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix equals Order of Matrix]], the [[Definition:Degree of Polynomial|degree]] of the...
Number of Linearly Independent Eigenvectors of Square Complex Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Linearly_Independent_Eigenvectors_of_Square_Complex_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Number_of_Linearly_Independent_Eigenvectors_of_Square_Complex_Matrix
[ "Eigenvectors of Square Matrices", "Linear Independence", "Square Matrices", "Complex Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix/Order", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set/Complex Vector Space", "Definition:Eigenvector/Square Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvalue/Square Matrix", "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Degree of Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix equals Order of Matrix", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial", "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Number of Roots of Polynomial With Complex Coefficients Equ...
proofwiki-22437
Velocity from Integration of Equation of Motion
Let $P$ be a particle of constant mass $m$ moving under a force $\mathbf F$ as a function of time $t$ according to the '''equation of motion''': :$m \dfrac {\d^2 \mathbf r} {\d t^2} = \map {\mathbf F} {\mathbf r}$ where $\mathbf r$ is the position vector of $P$. Let the velocity of $P$ at time $t = 0$ be $\mathbf v_0$....
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = m \dfrac {\d^2 \mathbf r} {\d t^2} | r = \map {\mathbf F} {\mathbf r} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\map \d {m \mathbf v} } {\d t} | c = Newton's First Law of Motion }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = m \dfrac {\d^2 \mathbf r} {\d t^2} | r = m \dfrac {\d \mathbf v} {\d...
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Particle|particle]] of [[Definition:Constant|constant]] [[Definition:Mass|mass]] $m$ moving under a [[Definition:Force|force]] $\mathbf F$ as a [[Definition:Real Function|function]] of [[Definition:Time|time]] $t$ according to the '''[[Definition:Equation of Motion|equation of motion]]''': :$m...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = m \dfrac {\d^2 \mathbf r} {\d t^2} | r = \map {\mathbf F} {\mathbf r} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\map \d {m \mathbf v} } {\d t} | c = [[Newton's First Law of Motion]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = m \dfrac {\d^2 \mathbf r} {\d t^2} | r = m \dfrac {\d \mathbf v}...
Velocity from Integration of Equation of Motion
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_from_Integration_of_Equation_of_Motion
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Velocity_from_Integration_of_Equation_of_Motion
[ "Velocity", "Equations of Motion" ]
[ "Definition:Particle", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Force", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Equation of Motion", "Definition:Position Vector", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Velocity" ]
[ "Newton's Laws of Motion/First Law", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Primitive (Calculus)/Integration", "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ]
proofwiki-22438
Lattice Isomorphism is Isomorphism in Category Lat
Let $\mathbf{Lat}$ denote the category of lattices. Let $f : L_1 \to L_2$ be a morphism of $\mathbf{Lat}$. Then: :$f$ is an isomorphism of $\mathbf{Lat}$ {{iff}} $f$ is a lattice isomorphsm
Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be the lattices $L_1 = \struct{A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct{A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ respectively. By definition of category of lattices: :$f$ is a lattice homomorphisms By definition of an isomorphism: :$f$ be an isomorphism of $\mathbf{Lat}$ {{iff}}: :$(1):$ ther...
Let $\mathbf{Lat}$ denote the [[Definition:Category of Lattices|category of lattices]]. Let $f : L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Morphism|morphism]] of $\mathbf{Lat}$. Then: :$f$ is an [[Definition:Isomorphism (Category Theory)|isomorphism]] of $\mathbf{Lat}$ {{iff}} $f$ is a [[Definition:Lattice Isomorphism|lattice...
Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be the [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]] $L_1 = \struct{A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct{A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ respectively. By definition of [[Definition:Category of Lattices|category of lattices]]: :$f$ is a [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattic...
Lattice Isomorphism is Isomorphism in Category Lat
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lattice_Isomorphism_is_Isomorphism_in_Category_Lat
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lattice_Isomorphism_is_Isomorphism_in_Category_Lat
[ "Lattice Isomorphisms", "Category of Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Category of Lattices", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Isomorphism (Category Theory)", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Category of Lattices", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Isomorphism (Category Theory)", "Definition:Isomorphism (Category Theory)", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Identity Morphism", "Definition:Category of Lattices", "Definition:Lat...
proofwiki-22439
Creation of Orthogonal Vector from Independent Vectors
Let $\mathbf V$ be a vector space. Let $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ be vectors of $\mathbf V$ such that $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ form a linearly independent set. Let $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ be expressed as column vectors. Let $\mathbf b'$ be calculated as: :$\mathbf b' = \mathbf b - \dfrac {\mathbf a^\intercal \m...
{{Recall|Orthogonal (Linear Algebra)|orthogonal}}: {{:Definition:Orthogonal (Linear Algebra)}} We will show that $\mathbf b'^\intercal \mathbf a = 0$. {{explain|why the inner product of $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ is the operation $\mathbf b'^\intercal \mathbf a$}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf b'^\intercal \mathbf...
Let $\mathbf V$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]]. Let $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ be [[Definition:Vector|vectors]] of $\mathbf V$ such that $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ form a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent set]]. Let $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ be expressed as [[Definition:Col...
{{Recall|Orthogonal (Linear Algebra)|orthogonal}}: {{:Definition:Orthogonal (Linear Algebra)}} We will show that $\mathbf b'^\intercal \mathbf a = 0$. {{explain|why the inner product of $\mathbf a$ and $\mathbf b$ is the operation $\mathbf b'^\intercal \mathbf a$}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf b'^\intercal \mat...
Creation of Orthogonal Vector from Independent Vectors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Creation_of_Orthogonal_Vector_from_Independent_Vectors
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Creation_of_Orthogonal_Vector_from_Independent_Vectors
[ "Orthogonality (Linear Algebra)", "Linear Independence" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Vector", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Column Matrix", "Definition:Transpose of Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal (Linear Algebra)" ]
[]
proofwiki-22440
Coset Space wrt Subring forms Ring iff Subring is Ideal
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring. Let $S$ be a subring of $R$. For $a \in R$, let $\paren {a + S}$ denote the coset of $S$ by $a$. Then: :The coset space of $R$ {{WRT}} $S$ forms a ring {{iff}}: :$S$ is an ideal of $R$.
{{ProofWanted|bit more consolidation of background needed yet}}
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)|ring]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Subring|subring]] of $R$. For $a \in R$, let $\paren {a + S}$ denote the [[Definition:Coset of Subring|coset of $S$]] by $a$. Then: :The [[Definition:Coset Space of Ring|coset space]] of $R$ {{WRT}} $S$ forms a [...
{{ProofWanted|bit more consolidation of background needed yet}}
Coset Space wrt Subring forms Ring iff Subring is Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Coset_Space_wrt_Subring_forms_Ring_iff_Subring_is_Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Coset_Space_wrt_Subring_forms_Ring_iff_Subring_is_Ideal
[ "Coset Spaces of Rings", "Ideals of Rings" ]
[ "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Subring", "Definition:Coset of Subring", "Definition:Coset Space of Ring", "Definition:Ring (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[]
proofwiki-22441
Basis of Point Lattice is not Necessarily Unique
Let $\LL$ be a point lattice of dimension $n$. Let $\BB = \set {\mathbf v_1, \mathbf v_2, \ldots, \mathbf v_n}$ be a basis of $\LL$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $\BB$ is the '''only''' basis of $\LL$.
{{MissingLinks}} Let $\LL$ be a point lattice of dimension $n$. Let $\BB = \set {\mathbf v_1,\mathbf v_2,\dots,\mathbf v_n}$ be a basis of $\LL$. Let $\BB' = \set {\mathbf v_1, \mathbf v_1 + \mathbf v_2, \dots, \mathbf v_n} = \set {\mathbf w_1, \mathbf w_2, \dots, \mathbf w_n}$. We will show that $\BB'$ is a basis for ...
Let $\LL$ be a [[Definition:Point Lattice|point lattice]] of [[Definition:Dimension of Point Lattice|dimension]] $n$. Let $\BB = \set {\mathbf v_1, \mathbf v_2, \ldots, \mathbf v_n}$ be a [[Definition:Basis of Point Lattice|basis]] of $\LL$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $\BB$ is the '''[[Definition:Uniqu...
{{MissingLinks}} Let $\LL$ be a point lattice of dimension $n$. Let $\BB = \set {\mathbf v_1,\mathbf v_2,\dots,\mathbf v_n}$ be a basis of $\LL$. Let $\BB' = \set {\mathbf v_1, \mathbf v_1 + \mathbf v_2, \dots, \mathbf v_n} = \set {\mathbf w_1, \mathbf w_2, \dots, \mathbf w_n}$. We will show that $\BB'$ is a basis ...
Basis of Point Lattice is not Necessarily Unique
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Basis_of_Point_Lattice_is_not_Necessarily_Unique
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Basis_of_Point_Lattice_is_not_Necessarily_Unique
[ "Bases of Point Lattices", "Point Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Point Lattice", "Definition:Point Lattice/Dimension", "Definition:Point Lattice/Basis", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Point Lattice/Basis" ]
[]
proofwiki-22442
Packing of Circles into Plane
The most space-efficient way to pack unit circles into the plane is to place their centers at the lattice points of the point lattice in $\R^n$ with a basis $\set {\tuple {2, 0}, \tuple {1, \sqrt 3} }$.
{{ProofWanted|see Point Lattice/Examples/2-Dimensional}}
The most space-efficient way to pack [[Definition:Unit Circle|unit circles]] into [[Definition:The Plane|the plane]] is to place their [[Definition:Center of Circle|centers]] at the [[Definition:Lattice Point|lattice points]] of the [[Definition:Point Lattice|point lattice]] in $\R^n$ with a [[Definition:Basis of Point...
{{ProofWanted|see [[Point Lattice/Examples/2-Dimensional]]}}
Packing of Circles into Plane
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Packing_of_Circles_into_Plane
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Packing_of_Circles_into_Plane
[ "Unit Circles", "Point Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Unit Circle", "Definition:Plane Surface/The Plane", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Lattice Point", "Definition:Point Lattice", "Definition:Point Lattice/Basis" ]
[ "Point Lattice/Examples/2-Dimensional" ]
proofwiki-22443
Inverse of Frame Isomorphism is Frame Isomorphism
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be frames. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a frame isomorphism. Let $\phi^{-1} : S_2 \to S_1$ be the inverse of $\phi : S_1 \to S_2$. Then: :$\phi^{-1} : L_2 \to L_1$ is a frame isomorphism
By definition of frame isomorphism: :$\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ is a complete lattice isomorphism From Inverse of Complete Lattice Isomorphism is Complete Lattice Isomorphism: :$\phi^{-1} : L_2 \to L_1$ is a complete lattice isomorphism By definition of frame isomorphism: :$\phi^{-1}: L_2 \to L_1$ is a frame isomorphism {{qed...
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frames]]. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Frame Isomorphism|frame isomorphism]]. Let $\phi^{-1} : S_2 \to S_1$ be the [[Definition:Inverse Mapping|inverse]] of $\phi : S_1 \to S_2$. Then: :$\p...
By definition of [[Definition:Frame Isomorphism|frame isomorphism]]: :$\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ is a [[Definition:Complete Lattice Isomorphism|complete lattice isomorphism]] From [[Inverse of Complete Lattice Isomorphism is Complete Lattice Isomorphism]]: :$\phi^{-1} : L_2 \to L_1$ is a [[Definition:Complete Lattice Isomor...
Inverse of Frame Isomorphism is Frame Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Frame_Isomorphism_is_Frame_Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Frame_Isomorphism_is_Frame_Isomorphism
[ "Frame Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Frame Isomorphism", "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Frame Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Frame Isomorphism", "Definition:Complete Lattice Isomorphism", "Inverse of Complete Lattice Isomorphism is Complete Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Complete Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Frame Isomorphism", "Definition:Frame Isomorphism", "Category:Frame Isomorphisms" ]
proofwiki-22444
Inverse of Lattice Isomorphism is Lattice Isomorphism
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be lattices. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a lattice isomorphism. Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be the inverse of $\phi : A_1 \to A_2$. Then: :$\phi^{-1} : L_2 \to L_1$ is a lattice isomorphism
By definition, a lattice isomorphism is a bijective lattice homomorphism. The result follows from Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism. {{qed}} Category:Lattice Isomorphisms i95oqn5vwwxq6ea85bsheaycwjh75sh
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]]. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Lattice Isomorphism|lattice isomorphism]]. Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be the [[Definition:Inverse Mapping|inver...
By definition, a [[Definition:Lattice Isomorphism|lattice isomorphism]] is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]]. The result follows from [[Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Lattice Isomorphisms]] ...
Inverse of Lattice Isomorphism is Lattice Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Lattice_Isomorphism_is_Lattice_Isomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Lattice_Isomorphism_is_Lattice_Isomorphism
[ "Lattice Isomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Inverse of Bijective Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Lattice Homomorphism", "Category:Lattice Isomorphisms" ]
proofwiki-22445
Frame Homomorphism is Lattice Homomorphism
Let $L_1 = \struct{S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct{S_2, \preceq_2}$ be frames. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a frame homomorphism. Then: :$\phi: \struct{S_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{S_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ is a lattice homomorphism where: :$\wedge_1, \vee_1$ denote the meet and join on $L_...
By definition of frame: :$L_1$ and $L_2$ are complete lattices From Complete Lattice is Lattice: :$\struct{S_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $\struct{S_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ are lattices where: :$\wedge_1, \vee_1$ denote the meet and join on $L_1$ :$\wedge_2, \vee_2$ denote the meet and join on $L_2$ ...
Let $L_1 = \struct{S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct{S_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frames]]. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Frame Homomorphism|frame homomorphism]]. Then: :$\phi: \struct{S_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1} \to \struct{S_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ is a [[Def...
By definition of [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frame]]: :$L_1$ and $L_2$ are [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattices]] From [[Complete Lattice is Lattice]]: :$\struct{S_1, \vee_1, \wedge_1, \preceq_1}$ and $\struct{S_2, \vee_2, \wedge_2, \preceq_2}$ are [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattices]] wher...
Frame Homomorphism is Lattice Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frame_Homomorphism_is_Lattice_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Frame_Homomorphism_is_Lattice_Homomorphism
[ "Frame Homomorphisms", "Lattice Homomorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Frame Homomorphism", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Meet", "Definition:Join", "Definition:Meet", "Definition:Join" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Complete Lattice is Lattice", "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Meet", "Definition:Join", "Definition:Meet", "Definition:Join", "Definition:Frame Homomorphism", "Definition:Arbitrary Join Preserving Mapping", "De...
proofwiki-22446
Ramanujan's Continued Fraction of One
Let $x \notin \Z_{<0}$. Then: :$1 = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 1 + \cfrac {x + 3 } {x + 2 + \ddots} } }$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \frac {x + 1} {x + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 2} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 1 + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 1 + \cfrac {x + 3} {x + 3} } } ...
Let $x \notin \Z_{<0}$. Then: :$1 = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 1 + \cfrac {x + 3 } {x + 2 + \ddots} } }$
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \frac {x + 1} {x + 1} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 2} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 1 + 1} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac {x + 1} {x + \cfrac {x + 2} {x + 1 + \cfrac {x + 3} {x + 3} } }...
Ramanujan's Continued Fraction of One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ramanujan's_Continued_Fraction_of_One
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ramanujan's_Continued_Fraction_of_One
[ "Ramanujan's Continued Fraction of One", "Continued Fractions", "Number Theory" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-22447
Continued Fraction for Real Arctangent Function
:$\arctan x = \cfrac x {1 + \cfrac {x^2} {3 - x^2 + \cfrac {\paren {3 x}^2} {5 - 3 x^2 + \cfrac {\paren {5 x}^2} {7 - 5 x^2 + \cfrac {\paren {7 x}^2} {\ddots } } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \arctan x | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {-1}^n \frac {x^{2 n + 1} } {2 n + 1} | c = Power Series Expansion for Real Arctangent Function for $-1 \le x \le 1$ }} {{eqn | r = x - \dfrac {x^3} 3 + \dfrac {x^5} 5 - \dfrac {x^7} 7 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = x + x \pa...
:$\arctan x = \cfrac x {1 + \cfrac {x^2} {3 - x^2 + \cfrac {\paren {3 x}^2} {5 - 3 x^2 + \cfrac {\paren {5 x}^2} {7 - 5 x^2 + \cfrac {\paren {7 x}^2} {\ddots } } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \arctan x | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {-1}^n \frac {x^{2 n + 1} } {2 n + 1} | c = [[Power Series Expansion for Real Arctangent Function]] for $-1 \le x \le 1$ }} {{eqn | r = x - \dfrac {x^3} 3 + \dfrac {x^5} 5 - \dfrac {x^7} 7 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = x + x...
Continued Fraction for Real Arctangent Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Real_Arctangent_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Real_Arctangent_Function
[ "Arctangent Function", "Continued Fractions", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula", "Examples of Euler's Continued Fraction Formula" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Real Arctangent Function", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula" ]
proofwiki-22448
Probability Mass Function of Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)/Also defined as
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable on a probability space $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $X$ have the '''type $2$ negative binomial distribution with parameters $r$ and $p$''', defined as the number of failures before $r$ successes have occurred. Then the probability mass function of $X$ is given by: :$\map \P...
{{Recall|Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)|subdef = Also defined as}} {{:Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)/Also defined as}} The number of Bernoulli trials may be as few as $0$, so the image is correct: :$\Img X = \set {0, 1, 2, \ldots}$ If $X$ takes the value $k$, then there must have been $k + ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] on a [[Definition:Probability Space|probability space]] $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $X$ have the '''[[Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)|type $2$ negative binomial distribution]] with parameters $r$ and $p$''', defin...
{{Recall|Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)|subdef = Also defined as}} {{:Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)/Also defined as}} The number of [[Definition:Bernoulli Trial|Bernoulli trials]] may be as few as $0$, so the [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] is correct: :$\Img X = \set {0, 1, 2, \ld...
Probability Mass Function of Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)/Also defined as
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_Mass_Function_of_Negative_Binomial_Distribution_(Type_2)/Also_defined_as
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_Mass_Function_of_Negative_Binomial_Distribution_(Type_2)/Also_defined_as
[ "Probability Mass Function of Negative Binomial Distribution", "Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)", "Probability Mass Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Probability Space", "Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution/Type 2", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Occurrence", "Definition:Probability Mass Function" ]
[ "Definition:Bernoulli Trial", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Event/Occurrence", "Definition:E...
proofwiki-22449
Probability Mass Function of Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)/Also defined as
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable on a probability space $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $X$ have the '''type $1$ negative binomial distribution with parameters $r$ and $p$''', defined as number of number of Bernoulli trials before the $r$th failure has occurred. Then the probability mass function of $X$ is gi...
{{Recall|Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)|subdef = Also defined as}} {{:Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)/Also defined as}} First note that the number of Bernoulli trials has to be at least $r$, so the image is correct: $\Img X = \set {r, r + 1, r + 2, \ldots}$. Now, note that if $X$ takes the v...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] on a [[Definition:Probability Space|probability space]] $\struct {\Omega, \Sigma, \Pr}$. Let $X$ have the '''[[Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)|type $1$ negative binomial distribution]] with parameters $r$ and $p$''', defin...
{{Recall|Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)|subdef = Also defined as}} {{:Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)/Also defined as}} First note that the number of [[Definition:Bernoulli Trial|Bernoulli trials]] has to be at least $r$, so the [[Definition:Image of Mapping|image]] is correct: $\Img X = \s...
Probability Mass Function of Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)/Also defined as
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_Mass_Function_of_Negative_Binomial_Distribution_(Type_1)/Also_defined_as
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_Mass_Function_of_Negative_Binomial_Distribution_(Type_1)/Also_defined_as
[ "Probability Mass Function of Negative Binomial Distribution", "Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 1)", "Probability Mass Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Probability Space", "Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution/Type 1", "Definition:Bernoulli Trial", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Occurrence", "Definition:Probability Mass Function", "Definition:Probability Mass Function" ]
[ "Definition:Bernoulli Trial", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Event/Occurrence", "Definition:Event", "Defin...
proofwiki-22450
Equivalence of Definitions of Frame Isomorphism/Definition 1 Implies Definition 2
Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be frames. Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a bijective frame homomorphism. Then: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is an order isomorphism.
From Frame Homomorphism is Lattice Homomorphism: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a bijective lattice homomorphism By definition of lattice isomorphism: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a lattice isomorphism From Inverse of Lattice Isomorphism is Lattice Isomorphism: :$\phi^{-1} : L_2 \to L_1$ is a lattice isomorphism By definition of...
Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frames]]. Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Frame Homomorphism|frame homomorphism]]. Then: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is an [[Definition:Order Isomorphism|order isomorphism]].
From [[Frame Homomorphism is Lattice Homomorphism]]: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Lattice Homomorphism|lattice homomorphism]] By definition of [[Definition:Lattice Isomorphism|lattice isomorphism]]: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a [[Definition:Lattice Isomorphism|lattice isomo...
Equivalence of Definitions of Frame Isomorphism/Definition 1 Implies Definition 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Frame_Isomorphism/Definition_1_Implies_Definition_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Frame_Isomorphism/Definition_1_Implies_Definition_2
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Frame Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Frame Homomorphism", "Definition:Order Isomorphism" ]
[ "Frame Homomorphism is Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism", "Inverse of Lattice Isomorphism is Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Lattice Isomorphism", "D...
proofwiki-22451
Expectation of Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)/Also defined as
Let $X$ be a discrete random variable with the type $2$ negative binomial distribution with parameters $r$ and $p$. Let $X$ use the definition as the number of failures before $r$ successes have occurred. Then the expectation of $X$ is given by: :$\expect X = \dfrac {r q} p$ where $q = 1 - p$.
Let $Y$ be a discrete random variable with the type $2$ negative binomial distribution with parameters $r$ and $p$. Let $Y$ use the definition as the number of successes before $r$ failures have occurred. From Expectation of Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2): :$\expect X = \dfrac {r p} q$ By definition: :$p$ is t...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with the [[Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)|type $2$ negative binomial distribution]] with parameters $r$ and $p$. Let $X$ use the definition as the number of [[Definition:Failure|failures]] before $r$ [[Definition:Success|...
Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]] with the [[Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)|type $2$ negative binomial distribution]] with parameters $r$ and $p$. Let $Y$ use the definition as the number of [[Definition:Success|successes]] before $r$ [[Definition:Failure...
Expectation of Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)/Also defined as
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Negative_Binomial_Distribution_(Type_2)/Also_defined_as
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expectation_of_Negative_Binomial_Distribution_(Type_2)/Also_defined_as
[ "Expectation of Negative Binomial Distribution", "Negative Binomial Distribution (Type 2)", "Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution/Type 2", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Occurrence", "Definition:Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Definition:Negative Binomial Distribution/Type 2", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribution", "Definition:Occurrence", "Expectation of Negative Binomial Distribution/Type 2", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Bernoulli Distribu...
proofwiki-22452
Equivalence of Definitions of Frame Isomorphism/Definition 4 Implies Definition 1
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be frames. Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a complete lattice isomorphism. Then: :$\phi$ is a bijective frame homomorphism
By definition of complete lattice isomorphism: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a bijective complete lattice homomorphism. From Complete Lattice Homomorphism is Frame Homomorphism: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a bijective frame homomorphism.
Let $L_1 = \struct {S_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {S_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)|frames]]. Let $\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Complete Lattice Isomorphism|complete lattice isomorphism]]. Then: :$\phi$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Frame Homomorphism|fra...
By definition of [[Definition:Complete Lattice Isomorphism|complete lattice isomorphism]]: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism|complete lattice homomorphism]]. From [[Complete Lattice Homomorphism is Frame Homomorphism]]: :$\phi : L_1 \to L_2$ is a ...
Equivalence of Definitions of Frame Isomorphism/Definition 4 Implies Definition 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Frame_Isomorphism/Definition_4_Implies_Definition_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Frame_Isomorphism/Definition_4_Implies_Definition_1
[ "Equivalence of Definitions of Frame Isomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Frame (Lattice Theory)", "Definition:Complete Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Frame Homomorphism" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice Isomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism", "Complete Lattice Homomorphism is Frame Homomorphism", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Frame Homomorphism" ]
proofwiki-22453
Continued Fraction for Exponential Function
:$e^x = \cfrac 1 {1 - \cfrac x {1 + x - \cfrac x {2 + x - \cfrac {2 x} {3 + x - \cfrac {3 x} {4 + x - \cfrac \ddots \ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = e^x | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {x^n } {n!} | c = Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function }} {{eqn | r = 1 + x + \frac {x^2} {2!} + \frac {x^3} {3!} + \frac {x^4} {4!} + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \paren 1 \paren x + \paren 1 \paren x \paren {\dfrac ...
:$e^x = \cfrac 1 {1 - \cfrac x {1 + x - \cfrac x {2 + x - \cfrac {2 x} {3 + x - \cfrac {3 x} {4 + x - \cfrac \ddots \ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = e^x | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {x^n } {n!} | c = [[Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function]] }} {{eqn | r = 1 + x + \frac {x^2} {2!} + \frac {x^3} {3!} + \frac {x^4} {4!} + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \paren 1 \paren x + \paren 1 \paren x \paren {\df...
Continued Fraction for Exponential Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Exponential_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Exponential_Function
[ "Continued Fraction for Exponential Function", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula", "Examples of Euler's Continued Fraction Formula", "Examples of Continued Fractions", "Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula" ]
proofwiki-22454
One Represented With Infinite Twos
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} + \cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} } + \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} + \cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} } } + \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} + \cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} } + \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots +...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \cfrac 2 {1 + 1} | c = One Layer Deep: $2^1$ ones and $\paren{2^1 - 1}$ twos }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {1 + 1} + \cfrac 2 {1 + 1} } | c = Two Layers Deep: $2^2$ ones and $\paren{2^2 - 1}$ twos }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {1 + 1} + \cfr...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} + \cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} } + \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} + \cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} } } + \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} + \cfrac 2 {\ddots + \ddots} } + \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\ddots +...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \cfrac 2 {1 + 1} | c = One Layer Deep: $2^1$ ones and $\paren{2^1 - 1}$ twos }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {1 + 1} + \cfrac 2 {1 + 1} } | c = Two Layers Deep: $2^2$ ones and $\paren{2^2 - 1}$ twos }} {{eqn | r = \cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {\cfrac 2 {1 + 1} + \...
One Represented With Infinite Twos
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One_Represented_With_Infinite_Twos
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One_Represented_With_Infinite_Twos
[ "Continued Fractions", "Number Theory", "Recreational Mathematics" ]
[]
[ "Category:Continued Fractions", "Category:Number Theory", "Category:Recreational Mathematics" ]
proofwiki-22455
Continued Fraction for Logarithm of 1 + x
:$\map \ln {1 + x} = \cfrac x {1 + \cfrac x {2 - x + \cfrac {2^2 x} {3 - 2 x + \cfrac {3^2 x} {4 - 3 x + \cfrac {\ddots} {\ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \ln {1 + x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {-1}^{n - 1} \frac {x^n} n | c = Power Series Expansion for Logarithm of 1 + x }} {{eqn | r = x - \frac {x^2} 2 + \frac {x^3} 3 - \frac {x^4} 4 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren x + \paren x \paren {-\dfrac x 2} + ...
:$\map \ln {1 + x} = \cfrac x {1 + \cfrac x {2 - x + \cfrac {2^2 x} {3 - 2 x + \cfrac {3^2 x} {4 - 3 x + \cfrac {\ddots} {\ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \ln {1 + x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {-1}^{n - 1} \frac {x^n} n | c = [[Power Series Expansion for Logarithm of 1 + x]] }} {{eqn | r = x - \frac {x^2} 2 + \frac {x^3} 3 - \frac {x^4} 4 + \cdots | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren x + \paren x \paren {-\dfrac x 2...
Continued Fraction for Logarithm of 1 + x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Logarithm_of_1_+_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Logarithm_of_1_+_x
[ "Continued Fractions", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula", "Examples of Euler's Continued Fraction Formula", "Natural Logarithms" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Logarithm of 1 + x", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-22456
Continued Fraction for Real Arcsine Function
:$\arcsin x = \cfrac x {1 - \cfrac {x^2} {2 \times 3 + x^2 - \cfrac {2 \times 3 \times \paren {3 x}^2} {4 \times 5 + \paren {3 x}^2 - \cfrac {4 \times 5 \times \paren {5 x}^2} {6 \times 7 + \paren {5 x}^2 - \cfrac {6 \times 7 \times \paren {7 x}^2} {\ddots } } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \arcsin x | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {2 n}!} {2^{2 n} \paren {n!}^2} \frac {x^{2 n + 1} } {2 n + 1} | c = Power Series Expansion for Real Arcsine Function for $-1 \le x \le 1$ }} {{eqn | r = x + \frac {x^3} {2 \times 3} + \frac {\paren {1 \times 3} x^5} {2 \tim...
:$\arcsin x = \cfrac x {1 - \cfrac {x^2} {2 \times 3 + x^2 - \cfrac {2 \times 3 \times \paren {3 x}^2} {4 \times 5 + \paren {3 x}^2 - \cfrac {4 \times 5 \times \paren {5 x}^2} {6 \times 7 + \paren {5 x}^2 - \cfrac {6 \times 7 \times \paren {7 x}^2} {\ddots } } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \arcsin x | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {2 n}!} {2^{2 n} \paren {n!}^2} \frac {x^{2 n + 1} } {2 n + 1} | c = [[Power Series Expansion for Real Arcsine Function]] for $-1 \le x \le 1$ }} {{eqn | r = x + \frac {x^3} {2 \times 3} + \frac {\paren {1 \times 3} x^5} {2 ...
Continued Fraction for Real Arcsine Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Real_Arcsine_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Real_Arcsine_Function
[ "Arcsine Function", "Continued Fractions", "Examples of Euler's Continued Fraction Formula", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Real Arcsine Function", "Euler's Continued Fraction Formula" ]
proofwiki-22457
Inverse of Bijective Complete Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Complete Lattice Homomorphism
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \preceq_2}$ be complete lattices. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a bijective complete lattice homomorphism. Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be the inverse of $\phi : A_1 \to A_2$. Then: :$\phi^{-1} : L_2 \to L_1$ is a bijective complete lattice homomorphism.
From Inverse of Bijection is Bijection: :$\phi^{-1}$ is a bijection It remains to show that $\phi^{-1}$ is a complete lattice homomorphism.
Let $L_1 = \struct {A_1, \preceq_1}$ and $L_2 = \struct {A_2, \preceq_2}$ be [[Definition:Complete Lattice|complete lattices]]. Let $\phi: L_1 \to L_2$ be a [[Definition:Bijection|bijective]] [[Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism|complete lattice homomorphism]]. Let $\phi^{-1} : A_2 \to A_1$ be the [[Definition...
From [[Inverse of Bijection is Bijection]]: :$\phi^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]] It remains to show that $\phi^{-1}$ is a [[Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism|complete lattice homomorphism]].
Inverse of Bijective Complete Lattice Homomorphism is Bijective Complete Lattice Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Bijective_Complete_Lattice_Homomorphism_is_Bijective_Complete_Lattice_Homomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Inverse_of_Bijective_Complete_Lattice_Homomorphism_is_Bijective_Complete_Lattice_Homomorphism
[ "Complete Lattice Homomorphisms", "Bijections" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Lattice", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism" ]
[ "Inverse of Bijection is Bijection", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism", "Definition:Complete Lattice Homomorphism" ]
proofwiki-22458
Converse of Fermat's Little Theorem does not hold
Let $n$ be a natural number. Let: :$n \divides a^n - a$ where: :$a$ is a natural number such that $n$ is not a divisor of $a$. :$\divides$ denotes divisibility. Then it is not necessarily the case that $n$ is prime
;Proof by Counterexample We have that: :$2^{341} \equiv 2 \pmod {341}$ despite the fact that $341$ is not prime: :$341 = 11 \times 31$ {{qed}}
Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]]. Let: :$n \divides a^n - a$ where: :$a$ is a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] such that $n$ is not a [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisor]] of $a$. :$\divides$ denotes [[Definition:Divisor of Integer|divisibility]]. Then it is not necessarily t...
;[[Proof by Counterexample]] We have that: :$2^{341} \equiv 2 \pmod {341}$ despite the fact that $341$ is not [[Definition:Prime Number|prime]]: :$341 = 11 \times 31$ {{qed}}
Converse of Fermat's Little Theorem does not hold
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Converse_of_Fermat's_Little_Theorem_does_not_hold
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Converse_of_Fermat's_Little_Theorem_does_not_hold
[ "Fermat's Little Theorem", "Fermat Pseudoprimes" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Proof by Counterexample", "Definition:Prime Number" ]
proofwiki-22459
Category DLat is Full Subcategory of Lat
Let $\mathbf {DLat}$ denote the category of distributive lattices. Let $\mathbf {Lat}$ denote the category of lattices. Then: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a full subcategory of $\mathbf {Lat}$
By definition of distributive lattice: :a distributive lattice is a lattice Hence the objects of $\mathbf {DLat}$ is a collection of objects of $\mathbf {Lat}$ By definition of category of distributive lattices: :every morphism of $\mathbf {DLat}$ is a morphism of $\mathbf {Lat}$ Hence the morphisms of $\mathbf {DLat}$...
Let $\mathbf {DLat}$ denote the [[Definition:Category of Distributive Lattices|category of distributive lattices]]. Let $\mathbf {Lat}$ denote the [[Definition:Category of Lattices|category of lattices]]. Then: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a [[Definition:Full Subcategory|full subcategory]] of $\mathbf {Lat}$
By definition of [[Definition:Distributive Lattice|distributive lattice]]: :a [[Definition:Distributive Lattice|distributive lattice]] is a [[Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)|lattice]] Hence the [[Definition:Object (Category Theory)|objects]] of $\mathbf {DLat}$ is a [[Definition:Collection|collection]] of [[Definiti...
Category DLat is Full Subcategory of Lat
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_DLat_is_Full_Subcategory_of_Lat
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_DLat_is_Full_Subcategory_of_Lat
[ "Category of Distributive Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Category of Distributive Lattices", "Definition:Category of Lattices", "Definition:Full Subcategory" ]
[ "Definition:Distributive Lattice", "Definition:Distributive Lattice", "Definition:Lattice (Order Theory)", "Definition:Object (Category Theory)", "Definition:Collection", "Definition:Object (Category Theory)", "Definition:Category of Distributive Lattices", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Morphis...
proofwiki-22460
Category of Distributive Lattices is Category
Let $\mathbf {DLat}$ denote the category of distributive lattices. Then: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a metacategory
From Category DLat is Full Subcategory of Lat: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a full subcategory of the category of lattices By definition of subcategory: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a metacategory {{qed}} Category:Category of Distributive Lattices h6ioghc0zqpd1un1b97ltg2f80zeicz
Let $\mathbf {DLat}$ denote the [[Definition:Category of Distributive Lattices|category of distributive lattices]]. Then: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]
From [[Category DLat is Full Subcategory of Lat]]: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a [[Definition:Full Subcategory|full subcategory]] of the [[Definition:Category of Lattices|category of lattices]] By definition of [[Definition:Subcategory|subcategory]]: :$\mathbf {DLat}$ is a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]] {{qed}} [...
Category of Distributive Lattices is Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Distributive_Lattices_is_Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Distributive_Lattices_is_Category
[ "Category of Distributive Lattices" ]
[ "Definition:Category of Distributive Lattices", "Definition:Metacategory" ]
[ "Category DLat is Full Subcategory of Lat", "Definition:Full Subcategory", "Definition:Category of Lattices", "Definition:Subcategory", "Definition:Metacategory", "Category:Category of Distributive Lattices" ]
proofwiki-22461
Tangent of Three Right Angles minus Angle
:$\map \tan {x - \dfrac {3 \pi} 2} = \cot x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {x - \frac {3 \pi} 2} | r = \frac {\map \sin {x - \frac {3 \pi} 2} } {\map \cos {x - \frac {3 \pi} 2} } | c = Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine }} {{eqn | r = \frac {-\cos x} {-\sin x} | c = Sine of Angle minus Three Right Angles and Cosine of Angle minus Three Rig...
:$\map \tan {x - \dfrac {3 \pi} 2} = \cot x$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {x - \frac {3 \pi} 2} | r = \frac {\map \sin {x - \frac {3 \pi} 2} } {\map \cos {x - \frac {3 \pi} 2} } | c = [[Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac {-\cos x} {-\sin x} | c = [[Sine of Angle minus Three Right Angles]] and [[Cosine of Angle minus...
Tangent of Three Right Angles minus Angle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Three_Right_Angles_minus_Angle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Three_Right_Angles_minus_Angle
[ "Tangent Function" ]
[]
[ "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine", "Sine of Angle minus Three Right Angles", "Cosine of Angle minus Three Right Angles", "Cotangent is Cosine divided by Sine" ]
proofwiki-22462
Gauss's Continued Fraction
:$\ds \frac {\map F {\alpha, \beta + 1; \gamma + 1; x} } {\map F {\alpha, \beta; \gamma; x} } = \cfrac 1 {1 - \cfrac {a x} {1 - \cfrac {b x} {1 - \cfrac {c x} {1 - \cfrac {d x} {1 - \cfrac {\ddots} {\ddots } } } } } }$ where: :$\map F {a, b; c; x}$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function of $x$: $\ds \sum_{k \mathop = ...
:First, we demonstate: :$\ds \dfrac {\map F {\alpha, \beta + 1, \gamma + 1; x} } {\map F {\alpha, \beta, \gamma; x} } = \dfrac 1 {1 - \dfrac {\alpha \paren {\gamma - \beta} x } {\gamma \paren {\gamma + 1} } \dfrac {\map F {\alpha + 1, \beta + 1, \gamma + 2; x} } {\map F {\alpha, \beta + 1, \gamma + 1; x} } }$ {{begin-e...
:$\ds \frac {\map F {\alpha, \beta + 1; \gamma + 1; x} } {\map F {\alpha, \beta; \gamma; x} } = \cfrac 1 {1 - \cfrac {a x} {1 - \cfrac {b x} {1 - \cfrac {c x} {1 - \cfrac {d x} {1 - \cfrac {\ddots} {\ddots } } } } } }$ where: :$\map F {a, b; c; x}$ is the [[Definition:Gaussian Hypergeometric Function|Gaussian hypergeo...
:First, we demonstate: :$\ds \dfrac {\map F {\alpha, \beta + 1, \gamma + 1; x} } {\map F {\alpha, \beta, \gamma; x} } = \dfrac 1 {1 - \dfrac {\alpha \paren {\gamma - \beta} x } {\gamma \paren {\gamma + 1} } \dfrac {\map F {\alpha + 1, \beta + 1, \gamma + 2; x} } {\map F {\alpha, \beta + 1, \gamma + 1; x} } }$ {{begin-...
Gauss's Continued Fraction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gauss's_Continued_Fraction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gauss's_Continued_Fraction
[ "Continued Fractions", "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function" ]
[ "Definition:Hypergeometric Function/Gaussian", "Definition:Rising Factorial" ]
[ "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 1", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 2", "Definition:Reciprocal" ]
proofwiki-22463
Empty Mapping is Surjective iff Codomain is Empty
Let $T$ be a set. Let $\O$ denote the empty set. Let $e: \O \to T$ be the empty mapping. Then $e$ is a surjection {{iff}} $T = \O$.
Let $T = \O$. From Empty Mapping to Empty Set is Bijective, $e$ is a bijection. Hence {{afortiori}} $e$ is a surjection. {{qed|lemma}} Let $T \ne \O$. {{AimForCont}} $e$ is a surjection. Let $t \in T$. As $e$ is a surjection: :$(1): \quad \exists s \in S: \map e s = t$ But by Null Relation is Mapping iff Domain is Empt...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\O$ denote the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]]. Let $e: \O \to T$ be the [[Definition:Empty Mapping|empty mapping]]. Then $e$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]] {{iff}} $T = \O$.
Let $T = \O$. From [[Empty Mapping to Empty Set is Bijective]], $e$ is a [[Definition:Bijection|bijection]]. Hence {{afortiori}} $e$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]]. {{qed|lemma}} Let $T \ne \O$. {{AimForCont}} $e$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]]. Let $t \in T$. As $e$ is a [[Definition:Surje...
Empty Mapping is Surjective iff Codomain is Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Mapping_is_Surjective_iff_Codomain_is_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Empty_Mapping_is_Surjective_iff_Codomain_is_Empty
[ "Empty Mapping", "Surjections" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Empty Mapping", "Definition:Surjection" ]
[ "Empty Mapping to Empty Set is Bijective", "Definition:Bijection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Null Relation is Mapping iff Domain is Empty Set", "Definition:Contradiction", "Proof by Contradiction", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", ...
proofwiki-22464
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 1
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c + 1; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {a \paren {c - b} x } {c \paren {c + 1} } \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 2; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c + 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} \paren {b + 1}^{\overline n} } {\paren {c + 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {a \paren {b + 1} } {\paren {c + 1} } x + \cdots + \fr...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c + 1; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {a \paren {c - b} x } {c \paren {c + 1} } \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 2; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c + 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} \paren {b + 1}^{\overline n} } {\paren {c + 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {a \paren {b + 1} } {\paren {c + 1} } x + \cdots + \fr...
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_1
[ "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22465
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c + 1; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {b \paren {c - a} x } {c \paren {c + 1} } \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 2; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c + 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {a + 1}^{\overline n} b^{\overline n} } {\paren {c + 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {\paren {a + 1} b } {\paren {c + 1} } x + \cdots + \...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c + 1; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {b \paren {c - a} x } {c \paren {c + 1} } \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 2; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c + 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {a + 1}^{\overline n} b^{\overline n} } {\paren {c + 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {\paren {a + 1} b } {\paren {c + 1} } x + \cdots + \...
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_2
[ "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22466
Classification of Stationary Points/Function of Two Variables
Let $\SS$ be a surface defined by the Cartesian equation $z = \map f {x, y}$. Let $P$ be a stationary point on $\SS$. Then $P$ is either: :a local maximum :a local minimum :a saddle point.
{{ProofWanted|one direction immediate, the other not so much}}
Let $\SS$ be a [[Definition:Surface|surface]] defined by the [[Definition:Cartesian Coordinates|Cartesian equation]] $z = \map f {x, y}$. Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Stationary Point of Function of Two Variables|stationary point]] on $\SS$. Then $P$ is either: :a [[Definition:Local Maximum|local maximum]] :a [[Definit...
{{ProofWanted|one direction immediate, the other not so much}}
Classification of Stationary Points/Function of Two Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Classification_of_Stationary_Points/Function_of_Two_Variables
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Classification_of_Stationary_Points/Function_of_Two_Variables
[ "Classification of Stationary Points" ]
[ "Definition:Surface", "Definition:Cartesian Coordinate System", "Definition:Stationary Point/Function of Two Variables", "Definition:Maximum Value of Real Function/Local", "Definition:Minimum Value of Real Function/Local", "Definition:Saddle Point (Geometry)" ]
[]
proofwiki-22467
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 3
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {a x } c \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} \paren {b + 1}^{\overline n} } {c^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {a \paren {b + 1} } c x + \cdots + \frac {\map \Gamma {a + n} \map \Gam...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {a x } c \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a, b + 1, c; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} \paren {b + 1}^{\overline n} } {c^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {a \paren {b + 1} } c x + \cdots + \frac {\map \Gamma {a + n} \map \Gam...
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_3
[ "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22468
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 4
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {b x } c \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {a + 1}^{\overline n} b^{\overline n} } {c^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {\paren {a + 1} b } c x + \cdots + \frac {\map \Gamma {a + 1 + n} \map ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c; x} - \map F {a, b, c; x} | r = \frac {b x } c \map F {a + 1, b + 1, c + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map F {a + 1, b, c; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {a + 1}^{\overline n} b^{\overline n} } {c^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {\paren {a + 1} b } c x + \cdots + \frac {\map \Gamma {a + 1 + n} \map ...
Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_4
[ "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22469
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 1
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a - 1; x} - \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a; x} | r = \frac x {a \paren {a - 1} } \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a - 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {a - 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac 1 {\paren {a - 1} } x + \cdots + \frac {\map \G...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a - 1; x} - \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a; x} | r = \frac x {a \paren {a - 1} } \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {a - 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {a - 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac 1 {\paren {a - 1} } x + \cdots + \frac {\map \G...
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_1
[ "Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22470
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 2
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} - \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} | r = \frac {\paren {a - b + 1} x} {b \paren {b - 1} } \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} } {\paren {b - 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac a {\paren {b - 1} } x + \cd...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} - \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} | r = \frac {\paren {a - b + 1} x} {b \paren {b - 1} } \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} } {\paren {b - 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac a {\paren {b - 1} } x + \cd...
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_2
[ "Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22471
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 3
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} - \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} | r = \frac {a x} {b \paren {b - 1} } \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} } {\paren {b - 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac a {\paren {b - 1} } x + \cd...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} - \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} | r = \frac {a x} {b \paren {b - 1} } \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b - 1; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {a^{\overline n} } {\paren {b - 1}^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac a {\paren {b - 1} } x + \cd...
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_3
[ "Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22472
Hyperbolic Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
:$\sinh x = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 3 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} } | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 3 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty ...
:$\sinh x = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 3 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} } | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 3 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty ...
Hyperbolic Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_Sine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_Sine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Hypergeometric Functions", "Hyperbolic Sine Function" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Legendre's Duplication Formula", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Power Series Expansion for Hyperbolic Sine Function" ]
proofwiki-22473
Area under Acceleration-Time Graph
Let $P$ be a particle moving in a straight line. Let the acceleration of $P$ as a function of time be $\map a t$. Let the velocity of $P$ as a function of time be $\map v t$. Let the motion of $P$ be plotted on an acceleration-time-graph $G$. Let $v_1$ and $v_2$ be the velocities of $P$ at times $t_1$ and $t_2$ respect...
Let $A$ be the area under $G$ between times $t_1$ and $t_2$. Then {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A | r = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \map a t \rd t | c = Area under Curve }} {{eqn | r = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \map {\dfrac {\d v} {\d t} } t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Acceleration}} }} {{eqn | r = \map v {t_2} - \map v {t_1} ...
Let $P$ be a [[Definition:Particle|particle]] [[Definition:Motion|moving]] in a [[Definition:Straight Line|straight line]]. Let the [[Definition:Acceleration|acceleration]] of $P$ as a [[Definition:Function|function]] of [[Definition:Time|time]] be $\map a t$. Let the [[Definition:Velocity|velocity]] of $P$ as a [[De...
Let $A$ be the [[Definition:Area under Graph|area under $G$]] between [[Definition:Time|times]] $t_1$ and $t_2$. Then {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A | r = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \map a t \rd t | c = [[Area under Curve]] }} {{eqn | r = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \map {\dfrac {\d v} {\d t} } t \rd t | c = {{Defof|Acceler...
Area under Acceleration-Time Graph
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_under_Acceleration-Time_Graph
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_under_Acceleration-Time_Graph
[ "Acceleration-Time Graphs" ]
[ "Definition:Particle", "Definition:Motion", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Acceleration", "Definition:Function", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Function", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Motion", "Definition:Acceleration-Time Graph", "Definition:Velocity", ...
[ "Definition:Darboux Integral/Geometric Interpretation", "Definition:Time", "Area under Curve", "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus/Second Part" ]
proofwiki-22474
Hyperbolic Cosine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
:$\cosh x = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 1 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 1 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\map \Gam...
:$\cosh x = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 1 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 1 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\map \Gam...
Hyperbolic Cosine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_Cosine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_Cosine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Hypergeometric Functions", "Hyperbolic Cosine Function" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Legendre's Duplication Formula", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Power Series Expansion for Hyperbolic Cosine Fu...
proofwiki-22475
Continued Fraction for Real Hyperbolic Tangent Function
:$\tanh x = \cfrac x {1 + \cfrac {x^2} {3 + \cfrac {x^2} {5 + \cfrac {x^2} {7 + \cfrac {x^2} {9 + \cfrac {x^2} \ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tanh x | r = \dfrac {\sinh x} {\cosh x} | c = {{Defof|Hyperbolic Tangent}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {x \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} } {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} } | c = Hyperbolic Sine Function in terms of Hypergeo...
:$\tanh x = \cfrac x {1 + \cfrac {x^2} {3 + \cfrac {x^2} {5 + \cfrac {x^2} {7 + \cfrac {x^2} {9 + \cfrac {x^2} \ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tanh x | r = \dfrac {\sinh x} {\cosh x} | c = {{Defof|Hyperbolic Tangent}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {x \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} } {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {x^2} 4} } | c = [[Hyperbolic Sine Function in terms of Hyperg...
Continued Fraction for Real Hyperbolic Tangent Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Real_Hyperbolic_Tangent_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Real_Hyperbolic_Tangent_Function
[ "Hyperbolic Tangent Function", "Continued Fractions", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Hyperbolic Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function", "Hyperbolic Cosine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Continued Fraction/Formulation 1", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-22476
Cosine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
:$\cos x = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 1 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 1 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {-x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\map \G...
:$\cos x = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 1 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 1 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {-x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\map \G...
Cosine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Hypergeometric Functions", "Cosine Function" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Legendre's Duplication Formula", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Power Series Expansion for Cosine Function" ]
proofwiki-22477
Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
:$\sin x = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 3 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} } | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 3 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {-x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\inft...
:$\sin x = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x \paren {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\frac 3 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} } | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {\paren {\frac 3 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {\frac {-x^2} 4 }^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\inft...
Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sine_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Hypergeometric Functions", "Sine Function" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Power", "Legendre's Duplication Formula", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Power Series Expansion for Hyperbolic Sine Function" ]
proofwiki-22478
Continued Fraction for Tangent Function
:$\tan x = \cfrac x {1 - \cfrac {x^2} {3 - \cfrac {x^2} {5 - \cfrac {x^2} {7 - \cfrac {x^2} {9 - \cfrac {x^2} \ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = \dfrac {\sin x} {\cos x} | c = {{Defof|Tangent}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {x \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} } {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} } | c = Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function, Cosine...
:$\tan x = \cfrac x {1 - \cfrac {x^2} {3 - \cfrac {x^2} {5 - \cfrac {x^2} {7 - \cfrac {x^2} {9 - \cfrac {x^2} \ddots} } } } }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \tan x | r = \dfrac {\sin x} {\cos x} | c = {{Defof|Tangent}} }} {{eqn | r = \frac {x \map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} } {\map { {}_0 \operatorname F_1} {\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac {-x^2} 4} } | c = [[Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function]], [[...
Continued Fraction for Tangent Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Tangent_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continued_Fraction_for_Tangent_Function
[ "Tangent Function", "Continued Fractions", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Sine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function", "Cosine Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Continued Fraction/Formulation 1", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-22479
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 4
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} - \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} | r = \frac x b \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {a + 1}^{\overline n} } {b^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {\paren {a + 1} } b x + \cd...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} - \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} | r = \frac x b \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} }} {{end-eqn}}
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {a + 1}^{\overline n} } {b^{\overline n} n!} x^n | c = {{Defof|Hypergeometric Function/Generalized|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 1 + \frac {\paren {a + 1} } b x + \cd...
Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Function_Difference_Equation/Formulation_4
[ "Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation" ]
[]
[ "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gamma Difference Equation" ]
proofwiki-22480
Exponential Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
:$e^x = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {p; p; x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {p; p; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {p}^{\bar n} } {\paren {p}^{\bar n} } \frac {x^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {x^n} {n!} | c = }} {{eqn | r ...
:$e^x = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {p; p; x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {p; p; x} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {p}^{\bar n} } {\paren {p}^{\bar n} } \frac {x^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Generalized Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {x^n} {n!} | c = }} {{eqn | r ...
Exponential Function in terms of Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Function_in_terms_of_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Hypergeometric Functions", "Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function" ]
proofwiki-22481
Hypergeometric Continued Fraction/Formulation 2
Let $a, b \in \C$. Let $b \notin \Z_{\le 0}$. :$\ds \frac {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} } {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} } = \cfrac 1 {1 - \cfrac x {b + \cfrac {\paren {a + 1} x} {\paren {b + 1} + \cfrac {\paren {a - b } x} {\paren {b + 2} + \cfrac {\paren {a + 2} x} {\paren {b + 3} + \cfrac ...
:First, we demonstate: :$\ds \frac {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} } {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} } = \frac 1 {1 - \dfrac x b \dfrac {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} } {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} } }$ {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} ...
Let $a, b \in \C$. Let $b \notin \Z_{\le 0}$. :$\ds \frac {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} } {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} } = \cfrac 1 {1 - \cfrac x {b + \cfrac {\paren {a + 1} x} {\paren {b + 1} + \cfrac {\paren {a - b } x} {\paren {b + 2} + \cfrac {\paren {a + 2} x} {\paren {b + 3} + \cfrac...
:First, we demonstate: :$\ds \frac {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} } {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a; b; x} } = \frac 1 {1 - \dfrac x b \dfrac {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b + 1; x} } {\map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1} {a + 1; b; x} } }$ {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map { {}_1 \operatorname F_1}...
Hypergeometric Continued Fraction/Formulation 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Continued_Fraction/Formulation_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_Continued_Fraction/Formulation_2
[ "Continued Fractions", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 4", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 3", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Hypergeometric Function Difference Equation/Formulation 2", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Category:Continued Fractions", "Category:Hy...
proofwiki-22482
Exponential Function as Limit of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
:$\ds e^x = \lim_{p \mathop \to \infty} \map F {1, p; 1; \dfrac x p}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{p \mathop \to \infty} \map F {1, p; 1; \dfrac x p} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \lim_{p \mathop \to \infty} \frac {\paren {p}^{\overline n} 1^{\overline n} } {1^{\overline n} } \frac {\paren {\dfrac x p}^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn |...
:$\ds e^x = \lim_{p \mathop \to \infty} \map F {1, p; 1; \dfrac x p}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{p \mathop \to \infty} \map F {1, p; 1; \dfrac x p} | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \lim_{p \mathop \to \infty} \frac {\paren {p}^{\overline n} 1^{\overline n} } {1^{\overline n} } \frac {\paren {\dfrac x p}^n} {n!} | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn |...
Exponential Function as Limit of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Function_as_Limit_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Function_as_Limit_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "Exponent Combination Laws/Power of Quotient", "Limit of Real Function/Examples/Reciprocal of x at Infinity", "Power Series Expansion for Exponential Function" ]
proofwiki-22483
Group of Rationals Modulo One Induces Equivalence Relation
Define a relation $\sim$ on $\Q$ such that: :$\forall p, q \in \Q: p \sim q \iff p - q \in \Z$ Then $\sim$ is an equivalence relation
{{proofread}} From Integers under Addition form Abelian Group, $\struct {\Z, +}$ forms an abelian group. Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence:
Define a [[Definition:Relation|relation]] $\sim$ on $\Q$ such that: :$\forall p, q \in \Q: p \sim q \iff p - q \in \Z$ Then $\sim$ is an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]]
{{proofread}} From [[Integers under Addition form Abelian Group]], $\struct {\Z, +}$ forms an [[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian group]]. Checking in turn each of the criteria for [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence]]:
Group of Rationals Modulo One Induces Equivalence Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_of_Rationals_Modulo_One_Induces_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_of_Rationals_Modulo_One_Induces_Equivalence_Relation
[ "Examples of Groups", "Rational Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
[ "Integers under Addition form Abelian Group", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
proofwiki-22484
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Real-Valued Functions is Equivalence Relation
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space. <onlyinclude> Let $\map {\mathcal M} {X, \Sigma, \R}$ be the real-valued $\Sigma$-measurable functions on $X$. Let $\sim_\mu$ be the $\mu$-almost-everywhere equality relation on $\map {\mathcal M} {X, \Sigma, \R}$ by: :$f \sim_\mu g$ {{iff}} $\map f x = \map g x$ for...
Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence:
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a [[Definition:Measure Space|measure space]]. <onlyinclude> Let $\map {\mathcal M} {X, \Sigma, \R}$ be the [[Definition:Space of Real-Valued Measurable Functions|real-valued $\Sigma$-measurable functions]] on $X$. Let $\sim_\mu$ be the $\mu$-almost-everywhere equality relation on $\...
Checking in turn each of the criteria for [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence]]:
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Real-Valued Functions is Equivalence Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Real-Valued_Functions_is_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Real-Valued_Functions_is_Equivalence_Relation
[ "Definitions/Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Measure Space", "Definition:Space of Measurable Functions/Real-Valued", "Definition:Almost Everywhere", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
proofwiki-22485
Cosecant Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
:$\csc x = \dfrac 1 x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; \sin^2 x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \arcsin x | r = x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; x^2} | c = Arcsine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \map \arcsin {\sin x} | r = \sin x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; \sin^2 x} | c = $x ...
:$\csc x = \dfrac 1 x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; \sin^2 x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \arcsin x | r = x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; x^2} | c = [[Arcsine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function]] }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \map \arcsin {\sin x} | r = \sin x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; \sin^2 x} | c =...
Cosecant Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosecant_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosecant_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Cosecant Function", "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Arcsine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Sine is Reciprocal of Cosecant" ]
proofwiki-22486
Secant Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
:$\sec x = \map F {\dfrac 1 2, 1; 1; \sin^2 x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 + x}^p | r = \map F {-p, 1; 1; -x} | c = Power of One plus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\sqrt {\paren {1 - \sin^2 x} } } | r = \map F {\frac 1 2, 1; 1; \sin^2 x} | c = $p \gets -\dfrac 1 2$ and $-...
:$\sec x = \map F {\dfrac 1 2, 1; 1; \sin^2 x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 + x}^p | r = \map F {-p, 1; 1; -x} | c = [[Power of One plus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function]] }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \frac 1 {\sqrt {\paren {1 - \sin^2 x} } } | r = \map F {\frac 1 2, 1; 1; \sin^2 x} | c = $p \gets -\dfrac 1 2$ an...
Secant Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Secant_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Secant_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Secant Function", "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Power of One plus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Cosine is Reciprocal of Secant" ]
proofwiki-22487
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Lebesgue Space is Equivalence Relation
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space, and let $p \in \closedint 1 \infty$. Let $\map {\mathcal L^p} {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be the Lebesgue $p$-space of $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$. We define the $\mu$-almost-everywhere equality relation $\sim_\mu$ on $\map {\mathcal L^p} {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ by: :$\forall f, g \in...
Let $f, g, h \in \LL^p$. Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence: === Reflexivity === From P-Seminorm of Function Zero iff A.E. Zero, we have: :$\norm {f - f}_p = 0$ Therefore: :$f \sim_\mu f$ Hence $\sim_\mu$ is a reflexive relation. {{qed|lemma}} === Symmetry === Suppose: :$f \sim_\mu g$ Then: :$\norm {...
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a [[Definition:Measure Space|measure space]], and let $p \in \closedint 1 \infty$. Let $\map {\mathcal L^p} {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be the [[Definition:Lebesgue Space|Lebesgue $p$-space]] of $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$. We define the [[Definition:Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation/Lebesgue...
Let $f, g, h \in \LL^p$. Checking in turn each of the criteria for [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence]]: === Reflexivity === From [[P-Seminorm of Function Zero iff A.E. Zero]], we have: :$\norm {f - f}_p = 0$ Therefore: :$f \sim_\mu f$ Hence $\sim_\mu$ is a [[Definition:Reflexive Relation|reflexive rel...
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Lebesgue Space is Equivalence Relation/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Lebesgue_Space_is_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Lebesgue_Space_is_Equivalence_Relation/Proof_1
[ "Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Lebesgue Space is Equivalence Relation", "Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation", "Functional Analysis", "Measure Theory", "Lebesgue Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Measure Space", "Definition:Lebesgue Space", "Definition:Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation/Lebesgue Space/Definition 1", "Definition:P-Seminorm", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "P-Seminorm of Function Zero iff A.E. Zero", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Transitive Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
proofwiki-22488
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Lebesgue Space is Equivalence Relation
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space, and let $p \in \closedint 1 \infty$. Let $\map {\mathcal L^p} {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be the Lebesgue $p$-space of $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$. We define the $\mu$-almost-everywhere equality relation $\sim_\mu$ on $\map {\mathcal L^p} {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ by: :$\forall f, g \in...
Let $f, g, h \in \LL^p$. Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence: === Reflexivity === By Equality is Reflexive, we have: :$f \sim_\mu f$ {{iff}} $\map f x = \map f x$ for $\mu$-almost all $x \in X$. Therefore: :$f \sim_\mu f$ Hence $\sim_\mu$ is a reflexive relation. {{qed|lemma}} === Symmetry === Suppose...
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a [[Definition:Measure Space|measure space]], and let $p \in \closedint 1 \infty$. Let $\map {\mathcal L^p} {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be the [[Definition:Lebesgue Space|Lebesgue $p$-space]] of $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$. We define the [[Definition:Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation/Lebesgue...
Let $f, g, h \in \LL^p$. Checking in turn each of the criteria for [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence]]: === Reflexivity === By [[Equality is Reflexive]], we have: :$f \sim_\mu f$ {{iff}} $\map f x = \map f x$ for [[Definition:Almost All|$\mu$-almost all]] $x \in X$. Therefore: :$f \sim_\mu f$ Hence $\...
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Lebesgue Space is Equivalence Relation/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Lebesgue_Space_is_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Lebesgue_Space_is_Equivalence_Relation/Proof_2
[ "Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Lebesgue Space is Equivalence Relation", "Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation", "Functional Analysis", "Measure Theory", "Lebesgue Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Measure Space", "Definition:Lebesgue Space", "Definition:Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation/Lebesgue Space/Definition 1", "Definition:P-Seminorm", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Equality is Reflexive", "Definition:Almost All", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Almost All", "Equality is Symmetric", "Definition:Almost All", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Almost All", "Definition:Almost All", "Equality is Transit...
proofwiki-22489
Cosine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
:$\map \cos x = \map F {\dfrac 1 2, -\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 1 2; \sin^2 x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 + x}^p | r = \map F {-p, 1; 1; -x} | c = Power of One plus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \sqrt {\paren {1 - \sin^2 x} } | r = \map F {-\frac 1 2, 1; 1; \sin^2 x} | c = $p \to \frac 1 2$ and $-x \to \sin^2 x...
:$\map \cos x = \map F {\dfrac 1 2, -\dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 1 2; \sin^2 x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {1 + x}^p | r = \map F {-p, 1; 1; -x} | c = [[Power of One plus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function]] }} {{eqn | ll = \leadsto | l = \sqrt {\paren {1 - \sin^2 x} } | r = \map F {-\frac 1 2, 1; 1; \sin^2 x} | c = $p \to \frac 1 2$ and $-x \to \sin...
Cosine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cosine_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Cosine Function", "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Power of One plus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Real Multiplication is Commutative", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-22490
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Measurable Sets is Equivalence Relation
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space. We define the $\mu$-almost-everywhere equality relation $\sim_\mu$ on $\Sigma$ by: :$A \sim_\mu B$ {{iff}} $\map \mu {A \symdif B} = 0$ where $\symdif$ denotes set symmetric difference. Then: :$\sim_\mu$ is an equivalence relation.
Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence: === Reflexivity === By Symmetric Difference with Self is Empty Set, we have: We have: :$A \symdif A = \O$ By Measure of Empty Set is Zero: :$\map \mu \O = 0$ So: :$\map \mu {A \symdif A} = 0$ Therefore: :$A \sim_\mu A$ Hence $\sim_\mu$ is a reflexive relation. {{qe...
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a [[Definition:Measure Space|measure space]]. We define the [[Definition:Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation/Measurable Sets|$\mu$-almost-everywhere equality relation]] $\sim_\mu$ on $\Sigma$ by: :$A \sim_\mu B$ {{iff}} $\map \mu {A \symdif B} = 0$ where $\symdif$ denotes [[Definiti...
Checking in turn each of the criteria for [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence]]: === Reflexivity === By [[Symmetric Difference with Self is Empty Set]], we have: We have: :$A \symdif A = \O$ By [[Measure of Empty Set is Zero]]: :$\map \mu \O = 0$ So: :$\map \mu {A \symdif A} = 0$ Therefore: :$A \sim_\m...
Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation for Measurable Sets is Equivalence Relation/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Measurable_Sets_is_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Almost-Everywhere_Equality_Relation_for_Measurable_Sets_is_Equivalence_Relation/Proof
[ "Definitions/Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Measure Space", "Definition:Almost-Everywhere Equality Relation/Measurable Sets", "Definition:Symmetric Difference", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Symmetric Difference with Self is Empty Set", "Measure of Empty Set is Zero", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Symmetric Relation", "Definition:Transitive Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
proofwiki-22491
Space of Integrable Functions Under Pointwise Addition forms Abelian Group
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space. Let $\map {\LL^1} \mu$ be the space of real-valued $\mu$-integrable functions. Then $\map {\LL^1} \mu$, endowed with pointwise addition, forms an abelian group over $\map {\LL^1} \mu$.
Suppose $f, g \in \map {\LL^1} \mu$. By Pointwise Sum of Integrable Functions is Integrable Function: :$f + g \in \map {\LL^1} \mu$ So $\map {\LL^1} \mu$ is closed under pointwise addition. {{finish}} Hence the result. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a [[Definition:Measure Space|measure space]]. Let $\map {\LL^1} \mu$ be the [[Definition:Space of Integrable Functions|space of real-valued $\mu$-integrable functions]]. Then $\map {\LL^1} \mu$, endowed with [[Definition:Pointwise Addition of Real-Valued Functions|pointwise addition...
Suppose $f, g \in \map {\LL^1} \mu$. By [[Pointwise Sum of Integrable Functions is Integrable Function]]: :$f + g \in \map {\LL^1} \mu$ So $\map {\LL^1} \mu$ is [[Definition:Closed Operation|closed]] under [[Definition:Pointwise Addition of Real-Valued Functions|pointwise addition]]. {{finish}} Hence the result. {{q...
Space of Integrable Functions Under Pointwise Addition forms Abelian Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Space_of_Integrable_Functions_Under_Pointwise_Addition_forms_Abelian_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Space_of_Integrable_Functions_Under_Pointwise_Addition_forms_Abelian_Group
[ "Measure-Integrable Functions", "Examples of Abelian Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Measure Space", "Definition:Space of Integrable Functions", "Definition:Pointwise Addition of Real-Valued Functions", "Definition:Abelian Group" ]
[ "Pointwise Sum of Integrable Functions is Integrable Function", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)/Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Pointwise Addition of Real-Valued Functions" ]
proofwiki-22492
Adjacency Matrix for Undirected Graph is Symmetric
Let $G$ be an undirected graph. The adjacency matrix for $G$ is a symmetric matrix.
{{MissingLinks}} {{tidy}} Let $G = \struct {V, E}$ be an undirected graph and $M$ its adjacency matrix. We will show that $M_{ij} = M_{ji}$. Let $v_i, v_j \in V$ be vertices on $G$. ;Case 1: $v_i v_j \in E$ It follows from the definition of adjacency matrix that $M_{ij} = 1$. It follows from the definition of undirect...
Let $G$ be an [[Definition:Undirected Graph|undirected graph]]. The [[Definition:Adjacency Matrix|adjacency matrix]] for $G$ is a [[Definition:Symmetric Matrix|symmetric matrix]].
{{MissingLinks}} {{tidy}} Let $G = \struct {V, E}$ be an [[Definition:Undirected Graph|undirected graph]] and $M$ its [[Definition:Adjacency Matrix|adjacency matrix]]. We will show that $M_{ij} = M_{ji}$. Let $v_i, v_j \in V$ be vertices on $G$. ;Case 1: $v_i v_j \in E$ It follows from the definition of [[Defin...
Adjacency Matrix for Undirected Graph is Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjacency_Matrix_for_Undirected_Graph_is_Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjacency_Matrix_for_Undirected_Graph_is_Symmetric
[ "Adjacency Matrices", "Undirected Graphs", "Symmetric Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Undirected Graph", "Definition:Adjacency Matrix", "Definition:Symmetric Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Undirected Graph", "Definition:Adjacency Matrix", "Definition:Adjacency Matrix", "Definition:Undirected Graph", "Definition:Adjacency Matrix", "Definition:Undirected Graph", "Definition:Contradiction", "Definition:Adjacency Matrix" ]
proofwiki-22493
Logarithm of One plus x over One minus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
:$\map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} } = 2 x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, 1; \dfrac 3 2; x^2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, 1; \dfrac 3 2; x^2} | r = 2 x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {\frac 1 2}^{\bar n} \paren {1}^{\bar n} } {\paren {\frac 3 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {x^2}^n } {n!} | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 2 x \sum_{n \mathop...
:$\map \ln {\dfrac {1 + x} {1 - x} } = 2 x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, 1; \dfrac 3 2; x^2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 x \map F {\dfrac 1 2, 1; \dfrac 3 2; x^2} | r = 2 x \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac {\paren {\frac 1 2}^{\bar n} \paren {1}^{\bar n} } {\paren {\frac 3 2}^{\bar n} } \frac {\paren {x^2}^n } {n!} | c = {{Defof|Gaussian Hypergeometric Function}} }} {{eqn | r = 2 x \sum_{n \mathop...
Logarithm of One plus x over One minus x in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Logarithm_of_One_plus_x_over_One_minus_x_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Logarithm_of_One_plus_x_over_One_minus_x_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Functions", "Logarithms" ]
[]
[ "Rising Factorial as Quotient of Factorials", "One to Integer Rising is Integer Factorial", "Gamma Function Extends Factorial", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Exponent Combination Laws/Product of Powers", "Power Series Expansion for Half Logarithm of 1 + x over 1 - x" ]
proofwiki-22494
Equivalence of Definitions of Affine Hull
Let $S$ be a set. {{TFAE|def = Affine Hull}}
=== Definition $(1)$ implies Definition $(2)$ === Let $\HH$ be the affine hull of $S$ by definition $1$. {{Recall|Affine Hull|index = 1}} {{:Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 1}} {{finish}} Thus $\HH$ is the affine hull of $S$ by definition $2$. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. {{TFAE|def = Affine Hull}}
=== Definition $(1)$ implies Definition $(2)$ === Let $\HH$ be the [[Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 1|affine hull of $S$ by definition $1$]]. {{Recall|Affine Hull|index = 1}} {{:Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 1}} {{finish}} Thus $\HH$ is the [[Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 2|affine hull of $S$ by defini...
Equivalence of Definitions of Affine Hull
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Affine_Hull
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Affine_Hull
[ "Affine Hulls" ]
[ "Definition:Set" ]
[ "Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 1", "Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 2", "Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 2", "Definition:Affine Hull/Definition 1" ]
proofwiki-22495
Arccosine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
:$\arccos x = 2 \sqrt {\dfrac {1 - x} 2} \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {1 - x} 2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = u | r = \map \arcsin {\sin u} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sin u \map F {\frac 1 2, \frac 1 2; \frac 3 2; \sin^2 u} | c = Arcsine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function }} {{eqn | r = \sqrt {\dfrac {1 - \map \cos {2 u} } 2} \map F {\frac 1 2, \frac 1 2; \frac 3 2; \d...
:$\arccos x = 2 \sqrt {\dfrac {1 - x} 2} \map F {\dfrac 1 2, \dfrac 1 2; \dfrac 3 2; \dfrac {1 - x} 2}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = u | r = \map \arcsin {\sin u} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \sin u \map F {\frac 1 2, \frac 1 2; \frac 3 2; \sin^2 u} | c = [[Arcsine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function]] }} {{eqn | r = \sqrt {\dfrac {1 - \map \cos {2 u} } 2} \map F {\frac 1 2, \frac 1 2; \frac 3 2...
Arccosine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Arccosine_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Arccosine_Function_in_terms_of_Gaussian_Hypergeometric_Function
[ "Arccosine Function", "Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Hypergeometric Functions" ]
[]
[ "Arcsine Function in terms of Gaussian Hypergeometric Function", "Double Angle Formula for Cosine/Corollary 5" ]
proofwiki-22496
Area of Right Parabolic Segment
Let $ABC$ be a right parabolic segment where: :$AB$ is the defining chord $\LL$ of $ABC$ :$C$ is the vertex of the defining parabola $\PP$ of $ABC$. :480px The area $\AA$ of $ABC$ is given by: :$\AA = \dfrac {2 a b} 3$ where: :$a$ is the length of the line segment $CF$, where $F$ is the point at which the axis of $\PP$...
Construct the triangle $\triangle ABC$: :480px From Quadrature of Parabola: :$\AA = \dfrac 4 3 \triangle ABC$ From Area of Triangle in Terms of Side and Altitude, the area of $\triangle ABC$ equals $\dfrac {a b} 2$. The result follows. {{qed}}
Let $ABC$ be a [[Definition:Right Parabolic Segment|right parabolic segment]] where: :$AB$ is the defining [[Definition:Chord of Parabola|chord]] $\LL$ of $ABC$ :$C$ is the [[Definition:Vertex of Parabola|vertex]] of the defining [[Definition:Parabola|parabola]] $\PP$ of $ABC$. :[[File:Area-of-Right-Parabolic-Segment...
Construct the [[Definition:Triangle (Geometry)|triangle]] $\triangle ABC$: :[[File:Area-of-Right-Parabolic-Segment-Proof.png|480px]] From [[Quadrature of Parabola]]: :$\AA = \dfrac 4 3 \triangle ABC$ From [[Area of Triangle in Terms of Side and Altitude]], the [[Definition:Area|area]] of $\triangle ABC$ equals $\d...
Area of Right Parabolic Segment
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Right_Parabolic_Segment
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_of_Right_Parabolic_Segment
[ "Right Parabolic Segments", "Area Formulas" ]
[ "Definition:Parabolic Segment/Right", "Definition:Chord of Conic Section/Parabola", "Definition:Parabola/Vertex", "Definition:Parabola", "File:Area-of-Right-Parabolic-Segment.png", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Par...
[ "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "File:Area-of-Right-Parabolic-Segment-Proof.png", "Quadrature of Parabola", "Area of Triangle in Terms of Side and Altitude", "Definition:Area" ]
proofwiki-22497
Logarithmic Approximation of Error Term of Stirling's Formula for Gamma Function/Lemma 1
:If $\size {\arg z} \le \dfrac \pi 4 $, then $K_z = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = K_z | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {z^2} {u^2 + z^2} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {\paren {\cmod z e^{i \size {\arg z} } }^2 } {u^2 + \paren {\cmod z e^{i \size {\arg z} } }^2} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {\cmod z^2 e^{i 2 \size {\...
:If $\size {\arg z} \le \dfrac \pi 4 $, then $K_z = 1$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = K_z | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {z^2} {u^2 + z^2} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {\paren {\cmod z e^{i \size {\arg z} } }^2 } {u^2 + \paren {\cmod z e^{i \size {\arg z} } }^2} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {\cmod z^2 e^{i 2 \size {\...
Logarithmic Approximation of Error Term of Stirling's Formula for Gamma Function/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Logarithmic_Approximation_of_Error_Term_of_Stirling's_Formula_for_Gamma_Function/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Logarithmic_Approximation_of_Error_Term_of_Stirling's_Formula_for_Gamma_Function/Lemma_1
[ "Logarithmic Approximation of Error Term of Stirling's Formula for Gamma Function" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Complex Number/Real Part", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Category:Logarithmic Approximation of Error Term of Stirling's Formula for Gamma Function" ]
proofwiki-22498
Logarithmic Approximation of Error Term of Stirling's Formula for Gamma Function/Lemma 2
:If $\dfrac \pi 4 < \size {\arg z} < \dfrac \pi 2 $, then $K_z = \map \csc {2 \size {\arg z} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = K_z | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {z^2} {u^2 + z^2} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {\cmod z^2 \paren {\map \cos {2 \size {\arg z} } + i \map \sin {2 \size {\arg z} } } } {u^2 + \cmod z^2 \paren {\map \cos {2 \size {\arg z} } + i \map \sin {2 \size {\arg z} } } ...
:If $\dfrac \pi 4 < \size {\arg z} < \dfrac \pi 2 $, then $K_z = \map \csc {2 \size {\arg z} }$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = K_z | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {z^2} {u^2 + z^2} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \map \sup {\size {\dfrac {\cmod z^2 \paren {\map \cos {2 \size {\arg z} } + i \map \sin {2 \size {\arg z} } } } {u^2 + \cmod z^2 \paren {\map \cos {2 \size {\arg z} } + i \map \sin {2 \size {\arg z} } } ...
Logarithmic Approximation of Error Term of Stirling's Formula for Gamma Function/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Logarithmic_Approximation_of_Error_Term_of_Stirling's_Formula_for_Gamma_Function/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Logarithmic_Approximation_of_Error_Term_of_Stirling's_Formula_for_Gamma_Function/Lemma_2
[ "Logarithmic Approximation of Error Term of Stirling's Formula for Gamma Function" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Complex Number/Real Part", "Definition:Negative/Real Number", "Definition:Minimization", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Definition:Maximum Value of Real Function", "Definition:Ratio", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Category:Logarithmic Approxima...
proofwiki-22499
Volume of Circular Cylinder/Height
Let $\CC$ be a circular cylinder such that: :the bases of $\CC$ are circles of radius $r$ :the height of $\CC$ is $h$. The volume $\VV$ of $\CC$ is given by the formula: :$\VV = \pi r^2 h$
From Volume of Cylinder in terms of Height and Base Area: :$\VV = \AA h$ where $\AA$ is the area of the base of $\CC$. From Area of Circle: :$\AA = \pi r^2$ The result follows. {{qed}}
Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Circular Cylinder|circular cylinder]] such that: :the [[Definition:Base of Cylinder|bases]] of $\CC$ are [[Definition:Circle|circles]] of [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] $r$ :the [[Definition:Height of Cylinder|height]] of $\CC$ is $h$. The [[Definition:Volume|volume]] $\VV$ of $\CC...
From [[Volume of Cylinder in terms of Height and Base Area]]: :$\VV = \AA h$ where $\AA$ is the [[Definition:Area|area]] of the [[Definition:Base of Cylinder|base]] of $\CC$. From [[Area of Circle]]: :$\AA = \pi r^2$ The result follows. {{qed}}
Volume of Circular Cylinder/Height
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Circular_Cylinder/Height
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Circular_Cylinder/Height
[ "Volume of Circular Cylinder" ]
[ "Definition:Circular Solid Figure/Cylinder", "Definition:Cylinder/Base", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Cylinder/Height", "Definition:Volume" ]
[ "Volume of Cylinder/Height and Base Area", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Cylinder/Base", "Area of Circle" ]