id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-23500
Fully T4 Space is Paracompact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a fully $T_4$ space. Then $T$ is paracompact.
{{Recall|Paracompact Space|paracompact}} {{:Definition:Paracompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a fully $T_4$ space. {{Recall|Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$}} {{:Definition:Fully T4 Space}} Let $\UU$ be an open cover for $T$. Then, from the definition of barycentric refinement, there exists a cover $\VV$ for $T$ ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Paracompact Space|paracompact]].
{{Recall|Paracompact Space|paracompact}} {{:Definition:Paracompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space]]. {{Recall|Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$}} {{:Definition:Fully T4 Space}} Let $\UU$ be an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] for $T$. Then, from the definition of...
Fully T4 Space is Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fully_T4_Space_is_Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fully_T4_Space_is_Paracompact
[ "Fully T4 Spaces", "Paracompact Spaces", "Sequence of Implications of Paracompactness Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Fully T4 Space", "Definition:Paracompact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Fully T4 Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Barycentric Refinement", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Fully Normal Space is Paracompact" ]
proofwiki-23501
Matrix is Unitary iff Columns are Orthonormal Basis
Let $\mathbf U$ be an $n \times n$ square matrix over $\mathbb C$. Then: :$\mathbf U$ is a unitary matrix {{Iff}} :The columns of $\mathbf U$ form an orthonormal basis of $\mathbb C^n$.
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $\mathbf U$ be unitary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf U^\dagger | r = \mathbf U^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Unitary Matrix}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \mathbf U^\dagger \mathbf U | r = \mathbf U^{-1} \mathbf U }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \mathbf U^\d...
Let $\mathbf U$ be an $n \times n$ [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] over $\mathbb C$. Then: :$\mathbf U$ is a [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary matrix]] {{Iff}} :The [[Definition:Column of Matrix|columns]] of $\mathbf U$ form an [[Definition:Orthonormal Basis of Vector Space|orthonormal basis]] of $\mathbb...
=== Sufficient Condition === Let $\mathbf U$ be [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf U^\dagger | r = \mathbf U^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Unitary Matrix}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \mathbf U^\dagger \mathbf U | r = \mathbf U^{-1} \mathbf U }} {{eqn | ll= \...
Matrix is Unitary iff Columns are Orthonormal Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_is_Unitary_iff_Columns_are_Orthonormal_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_is_Unitary_iff_Columns_are_Orthonormal_Basis
[ "Unitary Matrices", "Orthonormal Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Orthonormal Basis of Vector Space" ]
[ "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Equation", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Orthonormal Basis of Vector Space", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "D...
proofwiki-23502
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Products/Lemma 1
Let $a: X \to Y, b_1 : Y \to Z_1, b_2 : Y \to Z_2 \in \mathbf C$ be morphisms. ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ & X \ar[d]_*+{a} \\ & Y \ar[ld]_*+{b_1} \ar[rd]^*+{b_2} \\ Z_1 & & Z_2 }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Then: :$\family{b_1 \circ a, b_2 \circ a} = \family{b_1, b_2} \circ a$
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ && X \ar[ldld]_*+{b_1 \circ a} \ar[d]^*+{a} \ar[rdrd]^*+{b_2 \circ a} \\ && Y \ar[ldl]_*+{b_1} \ar@{-->}[d]^*+{\family{b_1, b_2} } \ar[rdr]^*+{b_2} \\ Z_1 && Z_1 \times Z_2 \ar[ll]^*+{p_1} \ar[rr]_*+{p_2} && Z_2 }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Th...
Let $a: X \to Y, b_1 : Y \to Z_1, b_2 : Y \to Z_2 \in \mathbf C$ be [[Definition:Morphism (Category Theory)|morphisms]]. ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ & X \ar[d]_*+{a} \\ & Y \ar[ld]_*+{b_1} \ar[rd]^*+{b_2} \\ Z_1 & & Z_2 }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Then: :$\family{b_1 \circ a, b_2 \circ a} = \family...
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ && X \ar[ldld]_*+{b_1 \circ a} \ar[d]^*+{a} \ar[rdrd]^*+{b_2 \circ a} \\ && Y \ar[ldl]_*+{b_1} \ar@{-->}[d]^*+{\family{b_1, b_2} } \ar[rdr]^*+{b_2} \\ Z_1 && Z_1 \times Z_2 \ar[ll]^*+{p_1} \ar[rr]_*+{p_2} && Z_2 }\end{xy}$</nowiki> ...
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Products/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Right_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Products/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Right_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Products/Lemma_1
[ "Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Products" ]
[ "Definition:Morphism" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Binary Product UMP (Category Theory)", "Definition:Binary Product UMP (Category Theory)", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "definition:Unique", "Definition:Morphism", "Category:Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary P...
proofwiki-23503
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Products/Lemma 2
Let $a_1: X \to Y_1, a_2: X \to Y_2, b_1 : Y_1 \to Z_1, b_2 : Y_2 \to Z_2 \in \mathbf C$ be morphisms: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ & X \ar[ld]_*+{a_1} \ar[rd]^*+{a_2} \\ Y_1 \ar[d]_*+{b_1} && Y_2 \ar[d]^*+{b_2} \\ Z_1 && Z_2 }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Then: :$\family{b_1 \circ a_1, b_2 \circ a_2} =...
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy} <0em,5em>*+{X} = "TM", <-6em,0em>*+{Y_1} = "ML", <0em,0em>*+{Y_1 \times Y_2} = "MM", <6em,0em>*+{Y_2} = "MR", <-6em,-5em>*+{Z_1} = "BL", <0em,-5em>*+{Z_1 \times Z_2} = "BM", <6em,-5em>*+{Z_2} = "BR", "TM";"ML" **\crv{<-4em,5em>} ?>*@{>} ?<>(.8)*!/^.8em/{a_1}, "TM";"MM" **@{--...
Let $a_1: X \to Y_1, a_2: X \to Y_2, b_1 : Y_1 \to Z_1, b_2 : Y_2 \to Z_2 \in \mathbf C$ be [[Definition:Morphism (Category Theory)|morphisms]]: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ & X \ar[ld]_*+{a_1} \ar[rd]^*+{a_2} \\ Y_1 \ar[d]_*+{b_1} && Y_2 \ar[d]^*+{b_2} \\ Z_1 && Z_2 }\end{xy}$</nowiki> T...
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy} <0em,5em>*+{X} = "TM", <-6em,0em>*+{Y_1} = "ML", <0em,0em>*+{Y_1 \times Y_2} = "MM", <6em,0em>*+{Y_2} = "MR", <-6em,-5em>*+{Z_1} = "BL", <0em,-5em>*+{Z_1 \times Z_2} = "BM", <6em,-5em>*+{Z_2} = "BR", "TM";"ML" **\crv{<-4em,5em>} ?>*@{>} ?<>(.8)*!/^.8em/{a_1}, "TM";"MM" **@...
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Products/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Right_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Products/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Right_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Products/Lemma_2
[ "Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Products" ]
[ "Definition:Morphism" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Binary Product UMP (Category Theory)", "Definition:Product of Morphisms", "Definition:Binary Product UMP (Category Theory)", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "definition:Unique", "Definition:Morphism", "Category:Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Ri...
proofwiki-23504
Compact Space is Strongly Paracompact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a compact topological space. Then $T$ is strongly paracompact.
{{Recall|Strongly Paracompact Space|strongly paracompact space}} {{:Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a compact topological space. {{Recall|Compact Topological Space|compact topological space}} {{:Definition:Compact Topological Space/Definition 1}} Let $\CC$ be an arbitrary open cov...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact topological space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space|strongly paracompact]].
{{Recall|Strongly Paracompact Space|strongly paracompact space}} {{:Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact topological space]]. {{Recall|Compact Topological Space|compact topological space}} {{:Definition:Compact Topological Space/Defini...
Compact Space is Strongly Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Space_is_Strongly_Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Space_is_Strongly_Paracompact
[ "Compact Topological Spaces", "Strongly Paracompact Spaces", "Sequence of Implications of Paracompactness Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Open Refinement", "Finite Cover is Star-Finite", "Definition:Star-Finite", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Open Cover", "...
proofwiki-23505
Finite Cover is Star-Finite
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $\CC$ be a finite cover for $T$. Then $\CC$ is star-finite.
{{Recall|Star-Finite|star-finite}} {{:Definition:Star-Finite}} Let $\CC$ be a finite cover for $T$. Let $H \in \CC$. As $\CC$ is a finite set, it follows trivially that only a finite number of elements of $\CC$ intersect $H$. Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:Star-Finite Category:Covers 73eh4e2pdx5dj2hdke1fdb2mswybmdh
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Finite Cover|finite cover]] for $T$. Then $\CC$ is [[Definition:Star-Finite|star-finite]].
{{Recall|Star-Finite|star-finite}} {{:Definition:Star-Finite}} Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Finite Cover|finite cover]] for $T$. Let $H \in \CC$. As $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]], it follows trivially that only a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite number]] of [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $\CC$ [[D...
Finite Cover is Star-Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Cover_is_Star-Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Cover_is_Star-Finite
[ "Star-Finite", "Covers" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Cover of Set/Finite", "Definition:Star-Finite" ]
[ "Definition:Cover of Set/Finite", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Category:Star-Finite", "Category:Covers" ]
proofwiki-23506
Locally Finite Refinement is Point Finite
Let $\CC$ be a cover of a topological space $T = \struct {S, \tau}$. Let $\UU$ be a locally finite refinement of $\CC$. Then $\UU$ is also a point finite refinement of $\CC$.
{{Recall|Locally Finite Cover|locally finite cover}} {{:Definition:Locally Finite Cover}} {{Recall|Point Finite Cover|point finite cover}} {{:Definition:Point Finite Cover}} Let $\UU$ be a locally finite refinement of a cover $\CC$ of $S$. Let $x \in S$. Then there exists some neighborhood $N_x$ of $x$ which intersects...
Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Cover of Set|cover]] of a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] $T = \struct {S, \tau}$. Let $\UU$ be a [[Definition:Locally Finite Cover|locally finite]] [[Definition:Refinement of Cover|refinement]] of $\CC$. Then $\UU$ is also a [[Definition:Point Finite Cover|point finite]...
{{Recall|Locally Finite Cover|locally finite cover}} {{:Definition:Locally Finite Cover}} {{Recall|Point Finite Cover|point finite cover}} {{:Definition:Point Finite Cover}} Let $\UU$ be a [[Definition:Locally Finite Cover|locally finite]] [[Definition:Refinement of Cover|refinement]] of a [[Definition:Cover of Set|c...
Locally Finite Refinement is Point Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Finite_Refinement_is_Point_Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Finite_Refinement_is_Point_Finite
[ "Refinements of Covers", "Locally Finite Covers", "Point Finite Covers" ]
[ "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Locally Finite Cover", "Definition:Refinement of Cover", "Definition:Point Finite Cover", "Definition:Refinement of Cover" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Finite Cover", "Definition:Refinement of Cover", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)/Point", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Refinement of Cover",...
proofwiki-23507
Submetacompact Space is Countably Metacompact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a submetacompact topological space. Then $T$ is countably metacompact.
{{Recall|Countably Metacompact Space|countably metacompact space}} {{:Definition:Countably Metacompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a submetacompact space. {{Recall|Submetacompact Space|submetacompact space}} {{:Definition:Submetacompact Space}} {{ProofWanted}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Submetacompact Space|submetacompact topological space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Countably Metacompact Space|countably metacompact]].
{{Recall|Countably Metacompact Space|countably metacompact space}} {{:Definition:Countably Metacompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Submetacompact Space|submetacompact space]]. {{Recall|Submetacompact Space|submetacompact space}} {{:Definition:Submetacompact Space}} {{ProofWanted}}
Submetacompact Space is Countably Metacompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Submetacompact_Space_is_Countably_Metacompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Submetacompact_Space_is_Countably_Metacompact
[ "Submetacompact Spaces", "Countably Metacompact Spaces", "Sequence of Implications of Paracompactness Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Submetacompact Space", "Definition:Countably Metacompact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Submetacompact Space" ]
proofwiki-23508
Pseudometrizable Space has Sigma-Locally Finite Basis
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a pseudometrizable topological space. Then $T$ has a basis that is $\sigma$-locally finite.
=== Construction of Basis $\VV$ === We construct a $\sigma$-locally finite basis $\VV$. For each $n \in \N$, let: :$\UU_n = \set {\map {B_{1 / 2^n} } x : x \in S}$ That is, $\UU_n$ is the set of all open balls of radius $\dfrac 1 {2^n}$. From Open Balls of Same Radius form Open Cover: :$\forall n \in \N: \UU_n$ is an o...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Pseudometrizable Space|pseudometrizable topological space]]. Then $T$ has a [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] that is [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Basis|$\sigma$-locally finite]].
=== Construction of Basis $\VV$ === We construct a [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets|$\sigma$-locally finite]] [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] $\VV$. For each $n \in \N$, let: :$\UU_n = \set {\map {B_{1 / 2^n} } x : x \in S}$ That is, $\UU_n$ is the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Op...
Pseudometrizable Space has Sigma-Locally Finite Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pseudometrizable_Space_has_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pseudometrizable_Space_has_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Basis
[ "Pseudometrizable Topologies", "Sigma-Locally Finite Bases", "Nagata-Smirnov Metrization Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Pseudometrizable Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Open Balls of Same Radius form Open Cover", "Definition:Open Cover", "Metric Space is Paracompact", "Definition:Paracompact Space", "Definition...
proofwiki-23509
Hermitian Conjugate of Unitary Matrix is Unitary
The Hermitian conjugate of a unitary matrix is unitary.
Let $\mathbf U$ be unitary. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf U | r = \mathbf U }} {{eqn | ll=\leadsto | l = \paren {\mathbf U^\dagger}^\dagger | r = \paren {\mathbf U^{-1} }^{-1} | c = Hermitian Conjugate is Involution }} {{eqn | ll=\leadsto | l = \paren {\mathbf U^\dagger}^\dagger ...
The [[Definition:Hermitian Conjugate|Hermitian conjugate]] of a [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary matrix]] is [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary]].
Let $\mathbf U$ be [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf U | r = \mathbf U }} {{eqn | ll=\leadsto | l = \paren {\mathbf U^\dagger}^\dagger | r = \paren {\mathbf U^{-1} }^{-1} | c = [[Hermitian Conjugate is Involution]] }} {{eqn | ll=\leadsto | l = ...
Hermitian Conjugate of Unitary Matrix is Unitary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_of_Unitary_Matrix_is_Unitary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_of_Unitary_Matrix_is_Unitary
[ "Unitary Matrices", "Hermitian Conjugates" ]
[ "Definition:Hermitian Conjugate", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Hermitian Conjugate is Involution", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Category:Unitary Matrices", "Category:Hermitian Conjugates" ]
proofwiki-23510
Countable Anticompact Space has Countable K-Network
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a countable anticompact topological space. Then $T$ has a countable $k$-network.
{{Recall|K-Network|$k$-network}} {{:Definition:K-Network/K-Network}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a countable anticompact topological space. {{Recall|Anticompact Space|anticompact space}} {{:Definition:Anticompact Space}} Let $\VV$ be the set of all singleton subsets of $S$. For all $U \in \VV$, $U$ is a compact subs...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Countable Topological Space|countable]] [[Definition:Anticompact Space|anticompact topological space]]. Then $T$ has a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] [[Definition:K-Network|$k$-network]].
{{Recall|K-Network|$k$-network}} {{:Definition:K-Network/K-Network}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Countable Topological Space|countable]] [[Definition:Anticompact Space|anticompact topological space]]. {{Recall|Anticompact Space|anticompact space}} {{:Definition:Anticompact Space}} Let $\VV$ be the ...
Countable Anticompact Space has Countable K-Network
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Anticompact_Space_has_Countable_K-Network
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Anticompact_Space_has_Countable_K-Network
[ "Anticompact Spaces", "Countable Topological Spaces", "K-Networks" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Topological Space", "Definition:Anticompact Space", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Network (Topology)/K-Network" ]
[ "Definition:Countable Topological Space", "Definition:Anticompact Space", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Netwo...
proofwiki-23511
T3 Space with Sigma-Locally Finite Basis is Pseudometrizable
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_3$ topological space. Let $\BB$ be a $\sigma$-locally finite basis of $T$. Then $T$ is pseudometrizable.
{{ProofWanted|see Nagata-Smirnov Metrization Theorem/Sufficient Condition}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T3 Space|$T_3$ topological space]]. Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Basis|$\sigma$-locally finite basis]] of $T$. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Pseudometrizable Space|pseudometrizable]].
{{ProofWanted|see [[Nagata-Smirnov Metrization Theorem/Sufficient Condition]]}}
T3 Space with Sigma-Locally Finite Basis is Pseudometrizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Space_with_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Basis_is_Pseudometrizable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T3_Space_with_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Basis_is_Pseudometrizable
[ "T3 Spaces", "Sigma-Locally Finite Bases", "Pseudometrizable Topologies" ]
[ "Definition:T3 Space", "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Basis", "Definition:Pseudometrizable Topology" ]
[ "Nagata-Smirnov Metrization Theorem/Sufficient Condition" ]
proofwiki-23512
Spectral Theorem for Real Symmetric Matrices
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix. Then $\mathbf A$ is a real symmetric matrix {{Iff}} it is diagonalizable to a real diagonal matrix via an orthogonal transformation. That is, we can write: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\intercal$ where: :$\mathbf D$ is a real diagonal matrix :$\mathbf U$ is a real orth...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be diagonalizable to a real diagonal matrix via an orthogonal transformation. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\intercal | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\intercal}^\intercal }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf U \mathbf D^\intercal \mathbf U^\intercal | c = Tra...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]]. Then $\mathbf A$ is a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Symmetric Matrix|symmetric matrix]] {{Iff}} it is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] to a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] v...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] to a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] via an [[Definition:Orthogonal Transformation|orthogonal transformation]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\intercal | r = \...
Spectral Theorem for Real Symmetric Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Real_Symmetric_Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Real_Symmetric_Matrices
[ "Spectral Theorems", "Symmetric Matrices", "Diagonalizable Matrices", "Real Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Symmetric Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal Transformation", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Real M...
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal Transformation", "Transpose of Matrix Product", "Transpose of Transpose of Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Symmetric Matrix", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:...
proofwiki-23513
Hermitian Conjugate of Real Matrix is Transpose
Let $\mathbf A$ be a real matrix. Then: :$\mathbf A^\dagger = \mathbf A^\intercal$ where :$\mathbf A^\dagger$ is the Hermitian conjugate of $\mathbf A$ :$\mathbf A^\intercal$ is the transpose of $\mathbf A$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \overline {\paren {\mathbf A^\intercal} } | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A^\intercal | c = Complex Number equals Conjugate iff Wholly Real }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Hermitian Conjugates Category:Transposes of Matrices ...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real matrix]]. Then: :$\mathbf A^\dagger = \mathbf A^\intercal$ where :$\mathbf A^\dagger$ is the [[Definition:Hermitian Conjugate|Hermitian conjugate]] of $\mathbf A$ :$\mathbf A^\intercal$ is the [[Definition:Transpose of Matrix|transpose]] of $\mathbf A$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \overline {\paren {\mathbf A^\intercal} } | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Conjugate}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A^\intercal | c = [[Complex Number equals Conjugate iff Wholly Real]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Hermitian Conjugates]] [[Category:Transposes ...
Hermitian Conjugate of Real Matrix is Transpose
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_of_Real_Matrix_is_Transpose
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_of_Real_Matrix_is_Transpose
[ "Hermitian Conjugates", "Transposes of Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Hermitian Conjugate", "Definition:Transpose of Matrix" ]
[ "Complex Number equals Conjugate iff Wholly Real", "Category:Hermitian Conjugates", "Category:Transposes of Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23514
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Necessary Condition
Let $\mathbf C$ be a locally small category. Let $\mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ be the product category of $\mathbf C$ with itself. Let $\Delta: \mathbf C \to \mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ denote the diagonal functor. Let $\Delta$ have a left adjoint. Then $\mathbf C$ has all binary coproducts such that the left adjoint is...
Let $\oplus:\mathbf {C \times C} \to \mathbf C$ be a left adjoint of $\Delta$. ==== $\mathbf C$ has all Binary Products ==== By definition of left adjoint there exists an adjunction $\tuple{\oplus, \Delta, \alpha}$. Let $\iota : \operatorname{id}_{\mathbf {C \times C} } \to \Delta \oplus$ denote the unit of adjunction ...
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Locally Small Category|locally small category]]. Let $\mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ be the [[Definition:Product Category|product category]] of $\mathbf C$ with itself. Let $\Delta: \mathbf C \to \mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ denote the [[Definition:Diagonal Functor on Product Category|di...
Let $\oplus:\mathbf {C \times C} \to \mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Left Adjoint Functor|left adjoint]] of $\Delta$. ==== $\mathbf C$ has all Binary Products ==== By definition of [[Definition:Left Adjoint Functor|left adjoint]] there exists an [[Definition:Adjunction|adjunction]] $\tuple{\oplus, \Delta, \alpha}$. Let...
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Necessary Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Necessary_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Necessary_Condition
[ "Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Small Category", "Definition:Product Category", "Definition:Diagonal Functor/Product Category", "Definition:Left Adjoint Functor", "Definition:Coproduct", "Definition:Left Adjoint Functor", "Definition:Coproduct Functor" ]
[ "Definition:Left Adjoint Functor", "Definition:Left Adjoint Functor", "Definition:Adjunction", "Definition:Unit of Adjunction", "Morphism of Unit of Adjunction is Universal", "Definition:Object (Category Theory)", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Universal Morphism from Object to Functor", "Defini...
proofwiki-23515
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Sufficient Condition
Let $\mathbf C$ be a locally small category. Let $\mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ be the product category of $\mathbf C$ with itself. Let $\Delta: \mathbf C \to \mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ denote the diagonal functor. Let $\mathbf C$ have all binary coproducts. Then $\Delta$ has a left adjoint.
Let $\sqcup: \mathbf {C \times C} \to \mathbf C$ denote the coproduct functor. It will be shown that there exists an adjunction $\tuple {\sqcup, \Delta, \alpha}$. ==== Construction of $\alpha$ ==== We construct $\alpha$ as follows. Let $X \in \mathbf C$ and $\tuple{C_1, C_2} \in \mathbf{C \times C}$ be objects. Let $\t...
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Locally Small Category|locally small category]]. Let $\mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ be the [[Definition:Product Category|product category]] of $\mathbf C$ with itself. Let $\Delta: \mathbf C \to \mathbf C \times \mathbf C$ denote the [[Definition:Diagonal Functor on Product Category|di...
Let $\sqcup: \mathbf {C \times C} \to \mathbf C$ denote the [[Definition:Coproduct Functor|coproduct functor]]. It will be shown that there exists an [[Definition:Adjunction|adjunction]] $\tuple {\sqcup, \Delta, \alpha}$. ==== Construction of $\alpha$ ==== We construct $\alpha$ as follows. Let $X \in \mathbf C$ ...
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Sufficient Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Sufficient_Condition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Sufficient_Condition
[ "Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Small Category", "Definition:Product Category", "Definition:Diagonal Functor/Product Category", "Definition:Coproduct", "Definition:Left Adjoint Functor" ]
[ "Definition:Coproduct Functor", "Definition:Adjunction", "Definition:Object (Category Theory)", "Definition:Coproduct", "Definition:Coproduct/Binary Coproduct Injection", "Definition:Coproduct", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set/Ordered Triple", "Definition:Binary Coproduct UMP", "Definition:...
proofwiki-23516
Identity Morphism of Coproduct
Let $\mathbf C$ be a metacategory. Let $C$ and $D$ be objects of $\mathbf C$, and let $C \sqcup D$ be a binary coproduct for $C$ and $D$. Then: :$\operatorname{id}_{\paren {C \mathop \sqcup D} } = \operatorname{id}_C \sqcup \operatorname{id}_D$ where $\operatorname{id}$ denotes an identity morphism, and $\sqcup$ signif...
By definition of the coproduct morphism $\operatorname{id}_C \sqcup \operatorname{id}_D$, it is the unique morphism making: $\quad\quad \begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+5px{ C \ar[r]^*+{i_1} \ar[d]_*+{\operatorname{id}_C} & C \sqcup D \ar@{-->}[d]^*+{\operatorname{id}_C \sqcup \operatorname{id}_D} & D \ar[l]_*+{i_2} \ar[d]^*...
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Let $C$ and $D$ be [[Definition:Object|objects]] of $\mathbf C$, and let $C \sqcup D$ be a [[Definition:Binary Coproduct (Category Theory)|binary coproduct]] for $C$ and $D$. Then: :$\operatorname{id}_{\paren {C \mathop \sqcup D} } = \operatorname{id}_C...
By definition of the [[Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms|coproduct morphism]] $\operatorname{id}_C \sqcup \operatorname{id}_D$, it is the [[Definition:Unique|unique]] [[Definition:Morphism (Category Theory)|morphism]] making: $\quad\quad \begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+5px{ C \ar[r]^*+{i_1} \ar[d]_*+{\operatorname{id}_C} &...
Identity Morphism of Coproduct
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Morphism_of_Coproduct
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Morphism_of_Coproduct
[ "Morphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Object", "Definition:Coproduct", "Definition:Identity Morphism", "Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Identity Morphism", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Identity Morphism", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Morphism", "Category:Morphisms" ]
proofwiki-23517
Coproduct of Composite Morphisms
Let $\mathbf C$ be a metacategory. Let $f \sqcup f': A \sqcup A' \to B \sqcup B'$ and $g \sqcup g': B \sqcup B' \to C \sqcup C'$ be two composable coproducts of morphisms in $\mathbf C$. Then: :$\paren {g \circ f} \sqcup \paren {g' \circ f'} = \paren {g \sqcup g'} \circ \paren {f \sqcup f'}$ where $\sqcup$ signifies co...
The situation is efficiently captured in the following commutative diagram: $\quad\quad \begin{xy} <-5em,0em>*+{A} = "A", <0em,0em>*+{A \sqcup A'} = "P", <5em,0em>*+{A'} = "A2", <-5em,-5em>*+{B} = "B", <0em,-5em>*+{B \sqcup B'} = "Q", <5em,-5em>*+{B'} = "B2", <-5em,-10em>*+{...
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Let $f \sqcup f': A \sqcup A' \to B \sqcup B'$ and $g \sqcup g': B \sqcup B' \to C \sqcup C'$ be two [[Definition:Composable Morphisms|composable]] [[Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms|coproducts of morphisms]] in $\mathbf C$. Then: :$\paren {g \circ f} ...
The situation is efficiently captured in the following [[Definition:Commutative Diagram|commutative diagram]]: $\quad\quad \begin{xy} <-5em,0em>*+{A} = "A", <0em,0em>*+{A \sqcup A'} = "P", <5em,0em>*+{A'} = "A2", <-5em,-5em>*+{B} = "B", <0em,-5em>*+{B \sqcup B'} = "Q", <5em,-5em>*+{B...
Coproduct of Composite Morphisms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Coproduct_of_Composite_Morphisms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Coproduct_of_Composite_Morphisms
[ "Product Categories", "Morphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Composable Morphisms", "Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms", "Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Category:Product Categories", "Category:Morphisms" ]
proofwiki-23518
Lindelöf Space is Meta-Lindelöf
Let $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ be a Lindelöf space. Then $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ is also a meta-Lindelöf space.
{{Recall|Meta-Lindelöf Space|meta-Lindelöf space}} {{:Definition:Meta-Lindelöf Space}} Let $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ be a Lindelöf space. {{Recall|Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space}} {{:Definition:Lindelöf Space}} Let $\CC$ be an open cover of $S$. Then by Countable Cover is Point Countable, $\CC$ is an open point countable c...
Let $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]]. Then $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ is also a [[Definition:Meta-Lindelöf Space|meta-Lindelöf space]].
{{Recall|Meta-Lindelöf Space|meta-Lindelöf space}} {{:Definition:Meta-Lindelöf Space}} Let $T = \struct{S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space]]. {{Recall|Lindelöf Space|Lindelöf space}} {{:Definition:Lindelöf Space}} Let $\CC$ be an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $S$. Then by [[Countabl...
Lindelöf Space is Meta-Lindelöf
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lindelöf_Space_is_Meta-Lindelöf
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lindelöf_Space_is_Meta-Lindelöf
[ "Meta-Lindelöf Spaces", "Lindelöf Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Meta-Lindelöf Space" ]
[ "Definition:Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Countable Cover is Point Countable", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Point Countable Cover", "Cover is Refinement of Itself", "Definition:Refinement of Cover", "Definition:Point Countable Cover", "Definition:Open Refinement" ]
proofwiki-23519
Countable Cover is Point Countable
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\CC$ be a countable cover of $S$. Then $\CC$ is a point countable cover of $S$.
Let $\CC$ be a countable cover of a set $S$. Let $x$ be a point of $S$. As $\CC$ is a countable set of sets, $x$ can be an element of only a countable number of elements of $\CC$. Hence the result, by definition of point countable cover. {{qed}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Countable Cover|countable cover]] of $S$. Then $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Point Countable Cover|point countable cover]] of $S$.
Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Countable Cover|countable cover]] of a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Point of Set|point]] of $S$. As $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable set]] of [[Definition:Set|sets]], $x$ can be an [[Definition:Element|element]] of only a [[Definition:Countable Set|c...
Countable Cover is Point Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Cover_is_Point_Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Cover_is_Point_Countable
[ "Countable Covers", "Point Countable Covers" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cover of Set/Countable", "Definition:Point Countable Cover" ]
[ "Definition:Cover of Set/Countable", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Point Countable Cover" ]
proofwiki-23520
Cover is Refinement of Itself
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\CC$ be a cover for $S$. Then $\CC$ is a refinement of $\CC$ itself.
From Set is Subset of Itself, $\CC$ is a subcover of itself. From Subcover is Refinement of Cover, $\CC$ is a refinement of itself. Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:Refinements of Covers Category:Covers c3yb90hrnczsaefmu905f6vm5usxiub
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Cover of Set|cover]] for $S$. Then $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Refinement of Cover|refinement]] of $\CC$ itself.
From [[Set is Subset of Itself]], $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Subcover|subcover]] of itself. From [[Subcover is Refinement of Cover]], $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Refinement of Cover|refinement]] of itself. Hence the result. {{qed}} [[Category:Refinements of Covers]] [[Category:Covers]] c3yb90hrnczsaefmu905f6vm5usxiub
Cover is Refinement of Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cover_is_Refinement_of_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cover_is_Refinement_of_Itself
[ "Refinements of Covers", "Covers" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cover of Set", "Definition:Refinement of Cover" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Itself", "Definition:Subcover", "Subcover is Refinement of Cover", "Definition:Refinement of Cover", "Category:Refinements of Covers", "Category:Covers" ]
proofwiki-23521
Weakly Locally Compact R1 Space is T3.5
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be an $R_1$ space which is weakly locally compact. Then $T$ is a $T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space.
{{Recall|T3.5 Space|$T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space}} {{:Definition:T3.5 Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a weakly locally compact $R_1$ space. {{Recall|Weakly Locally Compact Space|weakly locally compact space}} {{:Definition:Weakly Locally Compact Space}} {{ProofWanted}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be an [[Definition:R1 Space|$R_1$ space]] which is [[Definition:Weakly Locally Compact Space|weakly locally compact]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:T3.5 Space|$T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space]].
{{Recall|T3.5 Space|$T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space}} {{:Definition:T3.5 Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Weakly Locally Compact Space|weakly locally compact]] [[Definition:R1 Space|$R_1$ space]]. {{Recall|Weakly Locally Compact Space|weakly locally compact space}} {{:Definition:Weakly Local...
Weakly Locally Compact R1 Space is T3.5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weakly_Locally_Compact_R1_Space_is_T3.5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weakly_Locally_Compact_R1_Space_is_T3.5
[ "Weakly Locally Compact Spaces", "T3.5 Spaces", "R1 Spaces", "Sequence of Implications of Compactness Properties in Hausdorff Space" ]
[ "Definition:R1 Space", "Definition:Weakly Locally Compact Space", "Definition:T3.5 Space" ]
[ "Definition:Weakly Locally Compact Space", "Definition:R1 Space" ]
proofwiki-23522
T2 Space is R1
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is also a $R_1$ space.
Let $T$ be a $T_2$ space. {{Recall|T2 Space|$T_2$ space}} {{:Definition:T2 Space/Definition 3}} By $T_2$ Space is $T_1$ and $T_1$ Space is $T_0$, $T$ is a $T_0$ space. Hence by definition, for every pair of points $x, y \in T$, $x$ and $y$ are topologically distinguishable. {{Recall|R1 Space|$R_1$ space}} {{:Definition...
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]]. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is also a [[Definition:R1 Space|$R_1$ space]].
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ space]]. {{Recall|T2 Space|$T_2$ space}} {{:Definition:T2 Space/Definition 3}} By [[T2 Space is T1|$T_2$ Space is $T_1$]] and [[T1 Space is T0|$T_1$ Space is $T_0$]], $T$ is a [[Definition:T0 Space|$T_0$ space]]. Hence by definition, for every [[Definition:Doubleton|pair]] of...
T2 Space is R1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T2_Space_is_R1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T2_Space_is_R1
[ "R1 Spaces", "Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:R1 Space" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "T2 Space is T1", "T1 Space is T0", "Definition:T0 Space", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Topologically Distinguishable" ]
proofwiki-23523
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Lemma 1
Let $a_1 : X_1 \to Y, a_2 : X_2 \to Y, b: Y \to Z \in \mathbf C$ be morphisms. ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ X_1 \ar[rd]_*+{a_1} & & X_2 \ar[ld]^*+{a_2} \\ & Y \ar[d]_*+{b} \\ & Z }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Then: :$\sqbrk{b \circ a_1, b \circ a_2} = b \circ \sqbrk{a_1, a_2}$
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ X_1 \ar[rr]^*+{i_1} \ar[rdr]_*+{a_1} \ar[rdrd]_*+{b \circ a_1} && X_1 \sqcup X_2 \ar@{-->}[d]^*+{\sqbrk{a_1, a_2} } && X_2 \ar[ll]_*+{i_2} \ar[ldl]^*+{a_2} \ar[ldld]^*+{b \circ a_2} \\ && Y \ar[d]^*+{b} \\ && Z }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Thi...
Let $a_1 : X_1 \to Y, a_2 : X_2 \to Y, b: Y \to Z \in \mathbf C$ be [[Definition:Morphism (Category Theory)|morphisms]]. ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ X_1 \ar[rd]_*+{a_1} & & X_2 \ar[ld]^*+{a_2} \\ & Y \ar[d]_*+{b} \\ & Z }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Then: :$\sqbrk{b \circ a_1, b \circ a_2} = b \circ...
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ X_1 \ar[rr]^*+{i_1} \ar[rdr]_*+{a_1} \ar[rdrd]_*+{b \circ a_1} && X_1 \sqcup X_2 \ar@{-->}[d]^*+{\sqbrk{a_1, a_2} } && X_2 \ar[ll]_*+{i_2} \ar[ldl]^*+{a_2} \ar[ldld]^*+{b \circ a_2} \\ && Y \ar[d]^*+{b} \\ && Z }\end{xy}$</nowiki> ...
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Lemma 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Lemma_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Lemma_1
[ "Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts" ]
[ "Definition:Morphism" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Binary Coproduct UMP", "Definition:Binary Coproduct UMP", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "definition:Unique", "Definition:Morphism", "Category:Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts" ]
proofwiki-23524
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Lemma 2
Let $a_1: X_1 \to Y_1, a_2: X_1 \to Y_2, b_1 : Y_1 \to Z, b_2 : Y_2 \to Z \in \mathbf C$ be morphisms: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ X_1 \ar[d]_*+{a_1} && X_2 \ar[d]^*+{a_2} \\ Y_1 \ar[rd]_*+{b_1} && Y_2 \ar[ld]^*+{b_2} \\ & Z }\end{xy}$</nowiki> Then: :$\sqbrk{b_1 \circ a_1, b_2 \circ a_2} = ...
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy} <-6em,5em>*+{X_1} = "TL", <0em,5em>*+{X_1 \sqcup X_2} = "TM", <6em,5em>*+{X_2} = "TR", <-6em,0em>*+{Y_1} = "ML", <0em,0em>*+{Y_1 \sqcup Y_2} = "MM", <6em,0em>*+{Y_2} = "MR", <0em,-5em>*+{Z} = "BM", "TL";"TM" **@{-} ?>*@{>} ?<>(.5)*!/_.8em/{i_1}, "TR";"TM" **@{-} ?>*@{>} ?<>(....
Let $a_1: X_1 \to Y_1, a_2: X_1 \to Y_2, b_1 : Y_1 \to Z, b_2 : Y_2 \to Z \in \mathbf C$ be [[Definition:Morphism (Category Theory)|morphisms]]: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy}\xymatrix@+1em@L+3px{ X_1 \ar[d]_*+{a_1} && X_2 \ar[d]^*+{a_2} \\ Y_1 \ar[rd]_*+{b_1} && Y_2 \ar[ld]^*+{b_2} \\ & Z }\end{xy}$</nowiki> T...
Consider the diagram: ::<nowiki>$\begin{xy} <-6em,5em>*+{X_1} = "TL", <0em,5em>*+{X_1 \sqcup X_2} = "TM", <6em,5em>*+{X_2} = "TR", <-6em,0em>*+{Y_1} = "ML", <0em,0em>*+{Y_1 \sqcup Y_2} = "MM", <6em,0em>*+{Y_2} = "MR", <0em,-5em>*+{Z} = "BM", "TL";"TM" **@{-} ?>*@{>} ?<>(.5)*!/_.8em/{i_1}, "TR";"TM" **@{-} ?>*@{>} ?<...
Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Left Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Coproducts/Lemma 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Lemma_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Diagonal_Functor_on_Product_Category_has_Left_Adjoint_Iff_Category_has_Binary_Coproducts/Lemma_2
[ "Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has Binary Products" ]
[ "Definition:Morphism" ]
[ "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Coproduct of Morphisms", "Definition:Binary Coproduct UMP", "Definition:Binary Coproduct UMP", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "definition:Unique", "Definition:Morphism", "Category:Diagonal Functor on Product Category has Right Adjoint Iff Category has B...
proofwiki-23525
First-Countable T2 Countably Compact Space is Regular
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a first-countable $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space which is countably compact. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is also a regular space.
{{Recall|Regular Space|regular space}} {{:Definition:Regular Space/Definition 3}} So, let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a first-countable $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space which is countably compact. Let $A$ be a closed set of $T$. Let $x \notin A$ be a point of $S$ which is not in $A$. {{Recall|First-Countable Space|first-countable sp...
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]] [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]] which is [[Definition:Countably Compact Space|countably compact]]. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is also a [[Definition:Regular Space|regular space]].
{{Recall|Regular Space|regular space}} {{:Definition:Regular Space/Definition 3}} So, let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]] [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]] which is [[Definition:Countably Compact Space|countably compact]]. Let $A$ be a [[Definition:Closed Se...
First-Countable T2 Countably Compact Space is Regular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First-Countable_T2_Countably_Compact_Space_is_Regular
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/First-Countable_T2_Countably_Compact_Space_is_Regular
[ "First-Countable Spaces", "Hausdorff Spaces", "Countably Compact Spaces", "Regular Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Countably Compact Space", "Definition:Regular Space" ]
[ "Definition:First-Countable Space", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Countably Compact Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Defin...
proofwiki-23526
Topological Space with Countable Network has Sigma-Locally Finite Network
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which has a countable network. Then $T$ has a $\sigma$-locally finite network.
{{ProofWanted|Clarification needed as to the nature of a $\sigma$-locally finite set decoupled from the context of a topological space}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which has a [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]] [[Definition:Network (Topology)|network]]. Then $T$ has a [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets|$\sigma$-locally finite]] [[Definition:Network (Topology)|network]].
{{ProofWanted|Clarification needed as to the nature of a [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets|$\sigma$-locally finite set]] decoupled from the context of a topological space}}
Topological Space with Countable Network has Sigma-Locally Finite Network
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Space_with_Countable_Network_has_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Network
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Space_with_Countable_Network_has_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Network
[ "Networks (Topology)", "Countable Sets", "Sigma-Locally Finite Sets of Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Network (Topology)", "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets", "Definition:Network (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets" ]
proofwiki-23527
Strongly Paracompact Space is Paracompact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a strongly paracompact space. Then $T$ is paracompact.
{{Recall|Paracompact Space|paracompact space}} {{:Definition:Paracompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a strongly paracompact space. {{Recall|Strongly Paracompact Space|strongly paracompact space}} {{:Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space}} The result follows directly from Star-Finite Set is Locally Finite. {{...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space|strongly paracompact space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Paracompact Space|paracompact]].
{{Recall|Paracompact Space|paracompact space}} {{:Definition:Paracompact Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space|strongly paracompact space]]. {{Recall|Strongly Paracompact Space|strongly paracompact space}} {{:Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space}} The result follows direct...
Strongly Paracompact Space is Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Strongly_Paracompact_Space_is_Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Strongly_Paracompact_Space_is_Paracompact
[ "Strongly Paracompact Spaces", "Paracompact Spaces", "Sequence of Implications of Paracompactness Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space", "Definition:Paracompact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Strongly Paracompact Space", "Star-Finite Set is Locally Finite" ]
proofwiki-23528
Star-Finite Set is Locally Finite
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\FF$ be a set of subsets of $S$ which is '''star-finite'''. Then $\FF$ is locally finite.
{{Recall|Locally Finite Set of Subsets|locally finite}} {{:Definition:Locally Finite Set of Subsets}} Let $\FF \subseteq \powerset S$ be '''star-finite'''. {{Recall|Star-Finite|star-finite}} {{:Definition:Star-Finite}} {{ProofWanted}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\FF$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$ which is '''[[Definition:Star-Finite|star-finite]]'''. Then $\FF$ is [[Definition:Locally Finite|locally finite]].
{{Recall|Locally Finite Set of Subsets|locally finite}} {{:Definition:Locally Finite Set of Subsets}} Let $\FF \subseteq \powerset S$ be '''[[Definition:Star-Finite|star-finite]]'''. {{Recall|Star-Finite|star-finite}} {{:Definition:Star-Finite}} {{ProofWanted}}
Star-Finite Set is Locally Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Star-Finite_Set_is_Locally_Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Star-Finite_Set_is_Locally_Finite
[ "Star-Finite", "Locally Finite" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Star-Finite", "Definition:Locally Finite" ]
[ "Definition:Star-Finite" ]
proofwiki-23529
Topological Space with Sigma-Locally Finite K-Network has Sigma-Locally Finite Network
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which has a $\sigma$-locally finite $k$-network. Then $T$ has a $\sigma$-locally finite network.
Follows directly from K-Network is Network. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which has a [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets|$\sigma$-locally finite]] [[Definition:K-Network|$k$-network]]. Then $T$ has a [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets|$\sigma$-locally finite]] [[Definition:Network...
Follows directly from [[K-Network is Network]]. {{qed}}
Topological Space with Sigma-Locally Finite K-Network has Sigma-Locally Finite Network
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Space_with_Sigma-Locally_Finite_K-Network_has_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Network
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Space_with_Sigma-Locally_Finite_K-Network_has_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Network
[ "K-Networks", "Networks (Topology)", "Sigma-Locally Finite Sets of Subsets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets", "Definition:Network (Topology)/K-Network", "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Set of Subsets", "Definition:Network (Topology)" ]
[ "K-Network is Network" ]
proofwiki-23530
Taylor Series of Lorentz Factor at Low Speeds
The Lorentz factor has the following Taylor polynomial around $v = 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \gamma v | r = \frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2} } } }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {n!} \paren {\frac {\paren {2 n - 1} !!} {2 n} } \paren {\frac v c }^{2 n} }} {{eqn | o = \approx ...
{{Recall|Lorentz Factor|Lorentz factor}} {{:Definition:Lorentz Factor}} Let $x = v^2 / c^2$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \gamma x | r = \frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x} } }} {{eqn | r = \paren {1 - x}^{-\frac 1 2} }} {{end-eqn}} Note that $\map \gamma 0 = 1$. Proof by induction: For all $n \in \mathbb N_{> 0}$, le...
The [[Definition:Lorentz Factor|Lorentz factor]] has the following [[Taylor's Theorem/One Variable|Taylor polynomial]] around $v = 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \gamma v | r = \frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2} } } }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 1 {n!} \paren {\frac {\paren {2 n - 1} !!}...
{{Recall|Lorentz Factor|Lorentz factor}} {{:Definition:Lorentz Factor}} Let $x = v^2 / c^2$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \gamma x | r = \frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x} } }} {{eqn | r = \paren {1 - x}^{-\frac 1 2} }} {{end-eqn}} Note that $\map \gamma 0 = 1$. Proof by [[Definition:Principle of Mathematical I...
Taylor Series of Lorentz Factor at Low Speeds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Taylor_Series_of_Lorentz_Factor_at_Low_Speeds
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Taylor_Series_of_Lorentz_Factor_at_Low_Speeds
[ "Relativistic Mechanics", "Lorentz Factor", "Proofs by Induction" ]
[ "Definition:Lorentz Factor", "Taylor's Theorem/One Variable", "Definition:Speed", "Definition:Speed of Light", "Definition:Double Factorial" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Derivative/Real Function", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Derivative/Real Function", "Definition:Derivative/Real Function", "Definition:Derivative/Real Function" ]
proofwiki-23531
T4 and R0 Space is T3.5
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_4$ space which is also an $R_0$ space. Then $T$ is also a $T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space.
{{Recall|T3.5 Space|$T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space}} {{:Definition:T3.5 Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_4$ space and also an $R_0$ space {{Recall|T4 Space|$T_4$ space}} {{:Definition:T4 Space/Definition 1}} {{Recall|R0 Space|$R_0$ space}} {{:Definition:R0 Space}} {{ProofWanted|Should be similar to Nor...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T4 Space|$T_4$ space]] which is also an [[Definition:R0 Space|$R_0$ space]]. Then $T$ is also a [[Definition:T3.5 Space|$T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space]].
{{Recall|T3.5 Space|$T_{3 \frac 1 2}$ space}} {{:Definition:T3.5 Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T4 Space|$T_4$ space]] and also an [[Definition:R0 Space|$R_0$ space]] {{Recall|T4 Space|$T_4$ space}} {{:Definition:T4 Space/Definition 1}} {{Recall|R0 Space|$R_0$ space}} {{:Definiti...
T4 and R0 Space is T3.5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T4_and_R0_Space_is_T3.5
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T4_and_R0_Space_is_T3.5
[ "T4 Spaces", "R0 Spaces", "T3.5 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T4 Space", "Definition:R0 Space", "Definition:T3.5 Space" ]
[ "Definition:T4 Space", "Definition:R0 Space", "Normal Space is T3.5" ]
proofwiki-23532
Topological Space with Dispersion Point is not Empty
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which has a dispersion point. Then $T$ is not the empty space.
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ have a dispersion point $p$. Then $p \in S$ and so $S \ne \O$. The result follows. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which has a [[Definition:Dispersion Point|dispersion point]]. Then $T$ is not the [[Definition:Empty Space|empty space]].
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ have a [[Definition:Dispersion Point|dispersion point]] $p$. Then $p \in S$ and so $S \ne \O$. The result follows. {{qed}}
Topological Space with Dispersion Point is not Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Space_with_Dispersion_Point_is_not_Empty
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Space_with_Dispersion_Point_is_not_Empty
[ "Dispersion Points", "Empty Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Dispersion Point", "Definition:Empty Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Dispersion Point" ]
proofwiki-23533
Partition Space is Extremally Disconnected
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a partition space. Then $T$ is extremally disconnected.
{{Recall|Extremally Disconnected Space|extremally disconnected space}} {{:Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space/Definition 1}} Let $U \in \tau$ be an open set of $T$. By Subset of Partition Space is Open iff Closed, $U$ is also closed in $T$. From Closed Set equals its Closure, $U$ equals its closure. Hence the resu...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Partition Space|partition space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space|extremally disconnected]].
{{Recall|Extremally Disconnected Space|extremally disconnected space}} {{:Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space/Definition 1}} Let $U \in \tau$ be an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open set]] of $T$. By [[Subset of Partition Space is Open iff Closed]], $U$ is also [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $...
Partition Space is Extremally Disconnected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Partition_Space_is_Extremally_Disconnected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Partition_Space_is_Extremally_Disconnected
[ "Partition Topologies", "Examples of Extremally Disconnected Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Partition Topology", "Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Subset of Partition Space is Open iff Closed", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Set is Closed iff Equals Topological Closure", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space" ]
proofwiki-23534
Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space is T1
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which is totally pathwise disconnected space. Then $T$ is a $T_1$ space.
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a totally pathwise disconnected space. By Total Pathwise Disconnectedness is Hereditary, every subspace of $T$ is also totally pathwise disconnected. In particular, every doubleton subspace of $T$ is totally pathwise disconnected. Let $a, b \in S$ be arbitrary distinct points. From Double...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which is [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$ space]].
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected space]]. By [[Total Pathwise Disconnectedness is Hereditary]], every [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$ is also [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected...
Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space is T1/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Totally_Pathwise_Disconnected_Space_is_T1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Totally_Pathwise_Disconnected_Space_is_T1/Proof_2
[ "Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space is T1", "Totally Pathwise Disconnected Spaces", "T1 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:T1 Space" ]
[ "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Total Pathwise Disconnectedness is Hereditary", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definiti...
proofwiki-23535
Total Pathwise Disconnectedness is Hereditary
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which is totally pathwise disconnected space. Let $H$ be a subspace of $T$. Then $H$ is also a totally pathwise disconnected space.
{{Recall|Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected space}} {{:Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be totally pathwise disconnected. {{AimForCont}} $H$ is a subspace of $T$ which is not totally pathwise disconnected. Then by definition there e...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which is [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected space]]. Let $H$ be a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$. Then $H$ is also a [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|to...
{{Recall|Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected space}} {{:Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space/Definition 1}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected]]. {{AimForCont}} $H$ is a [[Definition:Topological Subspace...
Total Pathwise Disconnectedness is Hereditary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Total_Pathwise_Disconnectedness_is_Hereditary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Total_Pathwise_Disconnectedness_is_Hereditary
[ "Totally Pathwise Disconnected Spaces", "Examples of Hereditary Properties" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space" ]
[ "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:Path Component", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Path Component", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:Path Component", "Defin...
proofwiki-23536
Doubleton Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space is Discrete
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space whose underlying set $S$ is a doubleton. Let $T$ be totally pathwise disconnected space. Then $T$ is a discrete space.
{{WLOG}}, let $S = \set {0, 1}$. Hence let $T = \struct {\set {0, 1}, \tau}$ be a totally pathwise disconnected space. {{AimForCont}} $T$ is not a discrete space. {{WLOG}}, let $\set 1$ not be an open set of $T$. Let $f: \closedint 0 1 \to S$ be the mapping defined as: :$\map f x = \begin {cases} 0 & : x < \dfrac 1 2 \...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] whose [[Definition:Underlying Set of Topological Space|underlying set]] $S$ is a [[Definition:Doubleton|doubleton]]. Let $T$ be [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected space]]. Then $T$ is a [[D...
{{WLOG}}, let $S = \set {0, 1}$. Hence let $T = \struct {\set {0, 1}, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space|totally pathwise disconnected space]]. {{AimForCont}} $T$ is not a [[Definition:Discrete Space|discrete space]]. {{WLOG}}, let $\set 1$ not be an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open se...
Doubleton Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space is Discrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Doubleton_Totally_Pathwise_Disconnected_Space_is_Discrete
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Doubleton_Totally_Pathwise_Disconnected_Space_is_Discrete
[ "Totally Pathwise Disconnected Spaces", "Discrete Topologies" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Underlying Set/Topological Space", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:Discrete Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Constant Mapping", "Definition:Contradiction", "Definition:Totally Pathwise Disconnected Space", "Proof by C...
proofwiki-23537
Pseudometrizable Space is Fully T4
A pseudometrizable space $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ is a fully $T_4$ space.
{{Recall|Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space}} {{:Definition:Fully T4 Space}} {{proof wanted}}
A [[Definition:Pseudometrizable Space|pseudometrizable space]] $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ is a [[Definition:Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space]].
{{Recall|Fully T4 Space|fully $T_4$ space}} {{:Definition:Fully T4 Space}} {{proof wanted}}
Pseudometrizable Space is Fully T4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pseudometrizable_Space_is_Fully_T4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pseudometrizable_Space_is_Fully_T4
[ "Pseudometrizable Topologies", "Fully T4 Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Pseudometrizable Topology", "Definition:Fully T4 Space" ]
[]
proofwiki-23538
Locally Pseudometrizable Space is First-Countable
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which is locally pseudometrizable. Then $T$ is first-countable.
Let $\NN$ be a pseudometrizable neighborhood. The open balls of rational radius within $\NN$ form a local basis. Hence the result from the definition of first-countable. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which is [[Definition:Locally Pseudometrizable Space|locally pseudometrizable]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:First-Countable Space|first-countable]].
Let $\NN$ be a [[Definition:Pseudometrizable Space|pseudometrizable]] [[Definition:Neighborhood of Point|neighborhood]]. The [[Definition:Open Ball|open balls]] of [[Definition:Rational Number|rational]] [[Definition:Radius of Open Ball|radius]] within $\NN$ form a [[Definition:Local Basis|local basis]]. Hence the re...
Locally Pseudometrizable Space is First-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Pseudometrizable_Space_is_First-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Locally_Pseudometrizable_Space_is_First-Countable
[ "Locally Pseudometrizable Spaces", "First-Countable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Locally Pseudometrizable Space", "Definition:First-Countable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Pseudometrizable Topology", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)/Point", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Local Basis", "Definition:First-Countable Space" ]
proofwiki-23539
K1-Space which is K1-Hausdorff is K3
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space which is both a $k_1$-space and a $k_1$-Hausdorff space. Then $T$ is a $k_3$-space.
{{Recall|K3-Space|$k_3$-space}} {{:Definition:K3-Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be both a $k_1$-space and a $k_1$-Hausdorff space. {{Recall|K1-Space|$k_1$-space}} {{:Definition:K1-Space/Definition 1}} {{Recall|K1-Hausdorff Space|$k_1$-Hausdorff space}} {{:Definition:K1-Hausdorff Space/Definition 2}} The result fol...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]] which is both a [[Definition:K1-Space|$k_1$-space]] and a [[Definition:K1-Hausdorff Space|$k_1$-Hausdorff space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:K3-Space|$k_3$-space]].
{{Recall|K3-Space|$k_3$-space}} {{:Definition:K3-Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be both a [[Definition:K1-Space|$k_1$-space]] and a [[Definition:K1-Hausdorff Space|$k_1$-Hausdorff space]]. {{Recall|K1-Space|$k_1$-space}} {{:Definition:K1-Space/Definition 1}} {{Recall|K1-Hausdorff Space|$k_1$-Hausdorff space}} {...
K1-Space which is K1-Hausdorff is K3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/K1-Space_which_is_K1-Hausdorff_is_K3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/K1-Space_which_is_K1-Hausdorff_is_K3
[ "K1-Spaces", "K1-Hausdorff Spaces", "K3-Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:K1-Space", "Definition:K1-Hausdorff Space", "Definition:K3-Space" ]
[ "Definition:K1-Space", "Definition:K1-Hausdorff Space" ]
proofwiki-23540
Weakly Lindelöf Space with Sigma-Locally Finite Basis is Second-Countable
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a weakly Lindelöf topological space. Let $\BB$ be a $\sigma$-locally finite basis of $T$. Then $T$ is second-countable.
{{Refactor}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Weakly Lindelöf Space|weakly Lindelöf topological space]]. Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Basis|$\sigma$-locally finite basis]] of $T$. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable]].
{{Refactor}}
Weakly Lindelöf Space with Sigma-Locally Finite Basis is Second-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weakly_Lindelöf_Space_with_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Basis_is_Second-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weakly_Lindelöf_Space_with_Sigma-Locally_Finite_Basis_is_Second-Countable
[ "Weakly Lindelöf Spaces", "Sigma-Locally Finite Bases", "Second-Countable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Weakly Lindelöf Space", "Definition:Sigma-Locally Finite Basis", "Definition:Second-Countable Space" ]
[]
proofwiki-23541
Point in T1 Space is Intersection of Open Sets
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Then: :$T$ is a $T_1$ space {{iff}} :for every point $x \in S$, the singleton $\set x$ is the intersection of every open set $U$ of $T$ such that $x \in U$: ::$\forall x \in S: \set x = \ds \bigcap_{x \mathop \in U} \set {U \in \tau}$
{{Recall|T1 Space|$T_1$ space}} {{:Definition:T1 Space/Definition 1}} For arbitrary $x \in S$, let $\CC_x$ be the intersection of every open set $U$ of $T$ such that $x \in U$: :$\CC_x = \ds \bigcap_{x \mathop \in U} \set {U \in \tau}$
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then: :$T$ is a [[Definition:T1 Space|$T_1$ space]] {{iff}} :for every [[Definition:Point of Set|point]] $x \in S$, the [[Definition:Singleton|singleton]] $\set x$ is the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of every [[Definit...
{{Recall|T1 Space|$T_1$ space}} {{:Definition:T1 Space/Definition 1}} For [[Definition:Arbitrary|arbitrary]] $x \in S$, let $\CC_x$ be the [[Definition:Set Intersection|intersection]] of every [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open set]] $U$ of $T$ such that $x \in U$: :$\CC_x = \ds \bigcap_{x \mathop \in U} \set {U \i...
Point in T1 Space is Intersection of Open Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Point_in_T1_Space_is_Intersection_of_Open_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Point_in_T1_Space_is_Intersection_of_Open_Sets
[ "T1 Spaces", "Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Singleton", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:T1 Space", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definitio...
proofwiki-23542
Hermitian Conjugate is Adjoint
Let $\mathbf A$ be an $n \times m$ matrix over $\mathbb C$ that represents a linear transformation :$\LL : V \to W$ where :$V$ is $m$-dimensional :$W$ is $n$-dimensional in some orthonormal bases for $V$ and $W$. Then, the adjoint $\LL^*$ is given by $\mathbf A^\dagger$, the Hermitian conjugate of $\mathbf A$.
Let $\mathbf x \in \mathbb C^m$ and $\mathbf y \in \mathbb C^n$ be vectors representing elements of $V$ and $W$, respectively. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \innerprod {\mathbf A \mathbf x} {\mathbf y} | r = \mathbf y^\dagger \paren {\mathbf A \mathbf x} | c = {{Defof|Complex Vector Inner Product}} }} {{e...
Let $\mathbf A$ be an $n \times m$ [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] over $\mathbb C$ that represents a [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transformation]] :$\LL : V \to W$ where :$V$ is $m$-[[Definition:Dimension of Vector Space|dimensional]] :$W$ is $n$-[[Definition:Dimension of Vector Space|dimensional]] in some [...
Let $\mathbf x \in \mathbb C^m$ and $\mathbf y \in \mathbb C^n$ be [[Definition:Vector|vectors]] representing elements of $V$ and $W$, respectively. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \innerprod {\mathbf A \mathbf x} {\mathbf y} | r = \mathbf y^\dagger \paren {\mathbf A \mathbf x} | c = {{Defof|Complex Vector...
Hermitian Conjugate is Adjoint
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_is_Adjoint
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Conjugate_is_Adjoint
[ "Adjoint Linear Transformations", "Hermitian Conjugates" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space", "Definition:Orthonormal Basis", "Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation", "Definition:Hermitian Conjugate" ]
[ "Definition:Vector", "Matrix Multiplication is Associative", "Hermitian Conjugate of Matrix Product", "Hermitian Conjugate is Involution" ]
proofwiki-23543
Normal Matrix is Normal Operator
A normal matrix is a normal operator.
Let $\mathbf A$ be a normal matrix. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \mathbf A^\dagger \mathbf A | c = {{Defof|Normal Matrix}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \mathbf A \mathbf A^* | r = \mathbf A^* \mathbf A | c = Hermitian Conjugate is Adjoint }} {{end-eqn}...
A [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal matrix]] is a [[Definition:Normal Operator|normal operator]].
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal matrix]]. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \mathbf A^\dagger \mathbf A | c = {{Defof|Normal Matrix}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \mathbf A \mathbf A^* | r = \mathbf A^* \mathbf A | c = [[Hermitian Co...
Normal Matrix is Normal Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Matrix_is_Normal_Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Normal_Matrix_is_Normal_Operator
[ "Normal Matrices", "Normal Operators" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Normal Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Hermitian Conjugate is Adjoint", "Category:Normal Matrices", "Category:Normal Operators" ]
proofwiki-23544
Hermitian Matrix is Normal
All Hermitian matrices are normal.
Let $\mathbf T$ be a Hermitian matrix. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf T \mathbf T^\dagger | r = \mathbf T \mathbf T | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf T^\dagger \mathbf T | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Matrix}} }} {{end-eqn}} Thus, $\mathbf T$ is normal. {{qed}} Category:Herm...
All [[Definition:Hermitian Matrix|Hermitian matrices]] are [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]].
Let $\mathbf T$ be a [[Definition:Hermitian Matrix|Hermitian matrix]]. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf T \mathbf T^\dagger | r = \mathbf T \mathbf T | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf T^\dagger \mathbf T | c = {{Defof|Hermitian Matrix}} }} {{end-eqn}} Thus, $\mathbf T$...
Hermitian Matrix is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Matrix_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Hermitian_Matrix_is_Normal
[ "Hermitian Matrices", "Normal Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Hermitian Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Hermitian Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Category:Hermitian Matrices", "Category:Normal Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23545
Anti-Hermitian Matrix is Normal
All anti-Hermitian matrices are normal.
Let $\mathbf T$ be an anti-Hermitian matrix. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf T \mathbf T^\dagger | r = \mathbf T \paren {-\mathbf T} | c = {{Defof|Anti-Hermitian Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = -\mathbf T \mathbf T | c = Matrix Multiplication is Homogeneous of Degree 1 }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf T^\dagger...
All [[Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix|anti-Hermitian matrices]] are [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]].
Let $\mathbf T$ be an [[Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix|anti-Hermitian matrix]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf T \mathbf T^\dagger | r = \mathbf T \paren {-\mathbf T} | c = {{Defof|Anti-Hermitian Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = -\mathbf T \mathbf T | c = [[Matrix Multiplication is Homogeneous of D...
Anti-Hermitian Matrix is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Anti-Hermitian_Matrix_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Anti-Hermitian_Matrix_is_Normal
[ "Normal Matrices", "Anti-Hermitian Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix", "Matrix Multiplication is Homogeneous of Degree 1", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Category:Normal Matrices", "Category:Anti-Hermitian Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23546
Unitary Matrix is Normal
All unitary matrices are normal.
Let $\mathbf U$ be a unitary matrix of order $n$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf U \mathbf U^\dagger | r = \mathbf U \mathbf U^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Unitary Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf I_n | c = {{Defof|Inverse Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf U^{-1} \mathbf U | c = {{Defof|Inverse Matr...
All [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary matrices]] are [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]].
Let $\mathbf U$ be a [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] $n$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf U \mathbf U^\dagger | r = \mathbf U \mathbf U^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Unitary Matrix}} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf I_n | c = {{Defof|Inverse Matrix}} }} {{eqn |...
Unitary Matrix is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unitary_Matrix_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unitary_Matrix_is_Normal
[ "Unitary Matrices", "Normal Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Category:Unitary Matrices", "Category:Normal Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23547
Eigenvalues of Unitary Matrix have Unit Modulus
Let $\mathbf U$ be a unitary matrix. Let $\lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $\mathbf U$. Then: :$\size \lambda = 1$
Let $\mathbf v$ be an eigenvector of $\mathbf U$ associated with $\lambda$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \norm {\mathbf U \mathbf v}^2 | r = \innerprod {\mathbf U \mathbf v} {\mathbf U \mathbf v} | c = {{Defof|Inner Product Norm}} }} {{eqn | r = \innerprod {\lambda \mathbf v} {\lambda \mathbf v} | ...
Let $\mathbf U$ be a [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary matrix]]. Let $\lambda$ be an [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf U$. Then: :$\size \lambda = 1$
Let $\mathbf v$ be an [[Definition:Eigenvector|eigenvector]] of $\mathbf U$ associated with $\lambda$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \norm {\mathbf U \mathbf v}^2 | r = \innerprod {\mathbf U \mathbf v} {\mathbf U \mathbf v} | c = {{Defof|Inner Product Norm}} }} {{eqn | r = \innerprod {\lambda \mathbf v} ...
Eigenvalues of Unitary Matrix have Unit Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Unitary_Matrix_have_Unit_Modulus
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Unitary_Matrix_have_Unit_Modulus
[ "Unitary Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Eigenvalue" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvector", "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Modulus in Terms of Conjugate", "Hermitian Conjugate is Adjoint", "Definition:Eigenvector", "Definition:Inner Product", "Category:Unitary Matrices", "Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23548
Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space is Weakly Locally Compact
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a weakly $\sigma$-locally compact space. Then $T$ is weakly locally compact.
{{Recall|Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space|weakly $\sigma$-locally compact space}} {{:Definition:Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space}} The result follows by definition. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space|weakly $\sigma$-locally compact space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Weakly Locally Compact Space|weakly locally compact]].
{{Recall|Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space|weakly $\sigma$-locally compact space}} {{:Definition:Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space}} The result follows by definition. {{qed}}
Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space is Weakly Locally Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weakly_Sigma-Locally_Compact_Space_is_Weakly_Locally_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Weakly_Sigma-Locally_Compact_Space_is_Weakly_Locally_Compact
[ "Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Spaces", "Weakly Locally Compact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Weakly Sigma-Locally Compact Space", "Definition:Weakly Locally Compact Space" ]
[]
proofwiki-23549
Subcover of Open Cover is Open
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $\CC$ be an open cover of $T$. Let $\CC'$ be a subcover of $S$. Then $\CC'$ is also an open cover of $T$.
{{Recall|Open Cover|open cover}} {{:Definition:Open Cover}} {{Recall|Subcover|subcover}} {{:Definition:Subcover}} Let $U \in \CC'$ be arbitrary. By definition of subcover, $U \in \CC$. By definition of open cover, $U$ is open in $T$. As $U$ is arbitrary, it follows that all elements of $\CC$ are open in $T$. Hence, by ...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\CC$ be an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $T$. Let $\CC'$ be a [[Definition:Subcover|subcover]] of $S$. Then $\CC'$ is also an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $T$.
{{Recall|Open Cover|open cover}} {{:Definition:Open Cover}} {{Recall|Subcover|subcover}} {{:Definition:Subcover}} Let $U \in \CC'$ be [[Definition:Arbitrary|arbitrary]]. By definition of [[Definition:Subcover|subcover]], $U \in \CC$. By definition of [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]], $U$ is [[Definition:Open Se...
Subcover of Open Cover is Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subcover_of_Open_Cover_is_Open
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subcover_of_Open_Cover_is_Open
[ "Open Covers", "Subcovers" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover", "Definition:Open Cover" ]
[ "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Subcover", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Cover", "Category:Open Covers", "Category:Subcovers" ]
proofwiki-23550
Product of Matrix and Standard Basis Vector is Column of Matrix
Let $\mathbb F$ be a field. Let $\mathbf M$ be an $n \times m$ matrix over $\mathbb F$. Let $\mathbf m_p$ be the $p^{th}$ column of $\mathbf M$. Let $\mathbf e_p$ be the $p^{th}$ standard basis vector of $\mathbb F^m$ represented as a column vector. Then: :$\mathbf M \mathbf e_p = \mathbf m_p$
By definition, since the order of $\mathbf M$ is $n \times m$ and the order of $\mathbf e_p$ is $m \times 1$, the order of $\mathbf M \mathbf e_p$ is $n \times 1$. Thus, $\mathbf M \mathbf e_p$ is a column vector. Let $\sqbrk {\mathbf M \mathbf e_p}_i$ be the $i^{th}$ component of $\mathbf M \mathbf e_p$. Let $M_{ij}$ ...
Let $\mathbb F$ be a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]]. Let $\mathbf M$ be an $n \times m$ [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] over $\mathbb F$. Let $\mathbf m_p$ be the $p^{th}$ [[Definition:Column of Matrix|column]] of $\mathbf M$. Let $\mathbf e_p$ be the $p^{th}$ [[Definition:Standard Ordered Basis on Vecto...
By [[Definition:Matrix Product (Conventional)|definition]], since the [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] of $\mathbf M$ is $n \times m$ and the [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] of $\mathbf e_p$ is $m \times 1$, the [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] of $\mathbf M \mathbf e_p$ is $n \times 1$. Thus, $\mathbf M ...
Product of Matrix and Standard Basis Vector is Column of Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Matrix_and_Standard_Basis_Vector_is_Column_of_Matrix
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_Matrix_and_Standard_Basis_Vector_is_Column_of_Matrix
[ "Conventional Matrix Multiplication", "Standard Ordered Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Standard Ordered Basis/Vector Space", "Definition:Column Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix Product (Conventional)", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Column Matrix", "Definition:Vector Quantity/Component", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Vector Quantity/Component", "Definition:Vector Quantity/Component"...
proofwiki-23551
Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary
All real orthogonal matrices are unitary.
Let $\mathbf R$ be a real orthogonal matrix. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf R^\dagger | r = \mathbf R^\intercal | c = Hermitian Conjugate of Real Matrix is Transpose }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf R^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Orthogonal Matrix}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Orthogonal Matrices Category:Un...
All [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Orthogonal Matrix|orthogonal matrices]] are [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary]].
Let $\mathbf R$ be a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Orthogonal Matrix|orthogonal matrix]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf R^\dagger | r = \mathbf R^\intercal | c = [[Hermitian Conjugate of Real Matrix is Transpose]] }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf R^{-1} | c = {{Defof|Orthogonal Matrix}...
Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Orthogonal_Matrix_is_Unitary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Orthogonal_Matrix_is_Unitary
[ "Orthogonal Matrices", "Unitary Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal Matrix", "Hermitian Conjugate of Real Matrix is Transpose", "Category:Orthogonal Matrices", "Category:Unitary Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23552
Real Orthogonal Matrix is Normal
All real orthogonal matrices are normal.
Follows directly from Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary and Unitary Matrix is Normal. Category:Orthogonal Matrices Category:Normal Matrices jkm9uk6mt4vxvk5irw8c2dikrq10uo1
All [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Orthogonal Matrix|orthogonal matrices]] are [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]].
Follows directly from [[Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary]] and [[Unitary Matrix is Normal]]. [[Category:Orthogonal Matrices]] [[Category:Normal Matrices]] jkm9uk6mt4vxvk5irw8c2dikrq10uo1
Real Orthogonal Matrix is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Orthogonal_Matrix_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Orthogonal_Matrix_is_Normal
[ "Orthogonal Matrices", "Normal Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary", "Unitary Matrix is Normal", "Category:Orthogonal Matrices", "Category:Normal Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23553
Real Symmetric Matrix is Normal
All real symmetric matrices are normal.
Follows directly from Real Symmetric Matrix is Hermitian and Hermitian Matrix is Normal. Category:Real Matrices Category:Symmetric Matrices Category:Normal Matrices 2bnl4xd6ljue8ogkehtv45glhcqvye1
All [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Symmetric Matrix|symmetric matrices]] are [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]].
Follows directly from [[Real Symmetric Matrix is Hermitian]] and [[Hermitian Matrix is Normal]]. [[Category:Real Matrices]] [[Category:Symmetric Matrices]] [[Category:Normal Matrices]] 2bnl4xd6ljue8ogkehtv45glhcqvye1
Real Symmetric Matrix is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Symmetric_Matrix_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Symmetric_Matrix_is_Normal
[ "Real Matrices", "Symmetric Matrices", "Normal Matrices", "Real Matrices", "Symmetric Matrices", "Normal Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Symmetric Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Real Symmetric Matrix is Hermitian", "Hermitian Matrix is Normal", "Category:Real Matrices", "Category:Symmetric Matrices", "Category:Normal Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23554
Matrix Normality Preserved by Unitary Transformation
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be square matrices over $\mathbb C$. Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be similar via a unitary transformation, that is: :$\mathbf B = \mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger$ where :$\mathbf U$ is a unitary matrix :$\mathbf U^\dagger$ is the Hermitian conjugate of $\mathbf U$ Then, $\mathbf...
Let $\mathbf A$ be normal. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf B \mathbf B^\dagger | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger} \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger}^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger} \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A^\dagger \mathbf U^\dagger} ...
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrices]] over $\mathbb C$. Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be [[Definition:Similar Matrices|similar]] via a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]], that is: :$\mathbf B = \mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger$ where :$\mathbf ...
Let $\mathbf A$ be [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf B \mathbf B^\dagger | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger} \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger}^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A \mathbf U^\dagger} \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf A...
Matrix Normality Preserved by Unitary Transformation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_Normality_Preserved_by_Unitary_Transformation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Matrix_Normality_Preserved_by_Unitary_Transformation
[ "Matrix Similarity", "Normal Matrices", "Unitary Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix Similarity", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Hermitian Conjugate", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Hermitian Conjugate of Matrix Product", "Hermitian Conjugate is Involution", "Matrix Multiplication is Associative", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Matrix Multiplication is Associative", "Hermitian Conjugate of Matr...
proofwiki-23555
Finite Cover is Locally Finite
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\CC$ be a finite cover for a set $S$. Then $\CC$ is also a locally finite cover for $S$.
{{Recall|Locally Finite Cover|locally finite cover}} {{:Definition:Locally Finite Cover}} Let $\CC$ be a finite cover for a set $S$. {{Recall|Finite Cover|finite cover}} {{:Definition:Finite Cover}} Let $x \in S$ be arbitrary. From Topological Space is Neighborhood of all its Points, $S$ is a neighborhood of $x$. As $\...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Finite Cover|finite cover]] for a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. Then $\CC$ is also a [[Definition:Locally Finite Cover|locally finite cover]] for $S$.
{{Recall|Locally Finite Cover|locally finite cover}} {{:Definition:Locally Finite Cover}} Let $\CC$ be a [[Definition:Finite Cover|finite cover]] for a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. {{Recall|Finite Cover|finite cover}} {{:Definition:Finite Cover}} Let $x \in S$ be [[Definition:Arbitrary|arbitrary]]. From [[Topologica...
Finite Cover is Locally Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Cover_is_Locally_Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Finite_Cover_is_Locally_Finite
[ "Finite Covers", "Locally Finite Covers" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cover of Set/Finite", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Locally Finite Cover" ]
[ "Definition:Cover of Set/Finite", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Arbitrary", "Topological Space is Neighborhood of all its Points", "Definition:Neighborhood (Topology)/Point", "Definition:Cover of Set/Finite", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition...
proofwiki-23556
Characterization of Diagonalizable Matrices
Let $\mathbf A$ be a diagonalizable matrix of order $n$ over a field $\mathbb F$: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf X \mathbf D \mathbf X^{-1}$ where {{begin-itemize}} {{item||$\mathbf X$ is a nonsingular matrix of order $n$}} {{item||$\mathbf D$ is a diagonal matrix of order $n$.}} {{end-itemize}} Then: {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(...
We have that $\mathbf D$ is diagonal. Let $d_i = \sqbrk {\mathbf D}_{ii}$ be the $i^{th}$ diagonal element of $\mathbf D$. Let $\mathbf x_i$ be a column of $\mathbf X$. Let $\mathbf e_i$ be the $i^{th}$ standard basis vector of $\mathbb F^n$. Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A | r = \mathbf X \mathbf ...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] $n$ over a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] $\mathbb F$: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf X \mathbf D \mathbf X^{-1}$ where {{begin-itemize}} {{item||$\mathbf X$ is a [[Definition:Nonsingular Matrix...
We have that $\mathbf D$ is [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal]]. Let $d_i = \sqbrk {\mathbf D}_{ii}$ be the $i^{th}$ [[Definition:Main Diagonal|diagonal]] [[Definition:Element of Matrix|element]] of $\mathbf D$. Let $\mathbf x_i$ be a [[Definition:Column of Matrix|column]] of $\mathbf X$. Let $\mathbf e_i$ be th...
Characterization of Diagonalizable Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Diagonalizable_Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Characterization_of_Diagonalizable_Matrices
[ "Diagonalizable Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices", "Eigenvectors of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Nonsingular Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Eig...
[ "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Definition:Standard Ordered Basis/Vector Space", "Definition:Matrix Product (Conventional)/Post-Multiplication", "Definition:Matrix/Column", "Matrix Multiplication is Homogeneous ...
proofwiki-23557
Upper Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal
A square matrix that is both upper triangular and normal is diagonal.
Proof by induction. For all $n \in \mathbb N_{>0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :An $n \times n$ upper triangular normal matrix is diagonal
A [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] that is both [[Definition:Upper Triangular Matrix|upper triangular]] and [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]] is [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal]].
Proof by [[Definition:Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. For all $n \in \mathbb N_{>0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :An $n \times n$ [[Definition:Upper Triangular Matrix|upper triangular]] [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]] [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] is [[Definition:...
Upper Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_Triangular_Normal_Matrix_is_Diagonal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Upper_Triangular_Normal_Matrix_is_Diagonal
[ "Triangular Normal Matrix is Diagonal", "Normal Matrices", "Upper Triangular Matrices", "Diagonal Matrices", "Proofs by Induction" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Upper Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Upper Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Triangular Matrix/Upper Triangular Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:No...
proofwiki-23558
Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix over $\mathbb C$. Then $\mathbf A$ is normal {{Iff}} it is diagonalizable by a unitary transformation. That is, we can write: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger$ where :$\mathbf U$ is a unitary matrix :$\mathbf D$ is a diagonal matrix
=== Necessary Case === Assume $\mathbf A$ is diagonalizable by a unitary transformation. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger} \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger}^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dag...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] over $\mathbb C$. Then $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Normal Matrix|normal]] {{Iff}} it is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] by a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]]. That is, we can write: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf U ...
=== Necessary Case === Assume $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] by a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger} \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf...
Spectral Theorem for Normal Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Normal_Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Normal_Matrices
[ "Spectral Theorems", "Normal Matrices", "Diagonalizable Matrices", "Unitary Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Normal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Hermitian Conjugate of Matrix Product", "Hermitian Conjugate is Involution", "Matrix Multiplication is Associative", "Matrix Multiplication on Diagonal Matrices is Commutative", "Matrix Multiplication is Associative", "Hermitian...
proofwiki-23559
Spectral Theorem for Unitary Matrices
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix. Then, $\mathbf A$ is a unitary matrix {{Iff}} it is diagonalizable via a unitary transformation to a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are of unit modulus. That is, we can write: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger$ where :$\mathbf U$ is a unitary matrix :$\math...
=== Necessary Case === Let $A$ be diagonalizable via a unitary transformation to a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are of unit modulus. Let $d_i = \sqbrk {\mathbf D}_{ii}$ be the $i^{th}$ diagonal element of $\mathbf D$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^{-1} | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mat...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]]. Then, $\mathbf A$ is a [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary matrix]] {{Iff}} it is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] via a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]] to a [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] w...
=== Necessary Case === Let $A$ be [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] via a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]] to a [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] whose [[Definition:Main Diagonal|diagonal elements]] are of [[Definition:Unit (One)|unit]] [[Definition:Complex Mo...
Spectral Theorem for Unitary Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Unitary_Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Unitary_Matrices
[ "Spectral Theorems", "Unitary Transformations", "Diagonalizable Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Unit (One)", "Definition:Complex Modulus", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Definition:...
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Unit (One)", "Definition:Complex Modulus", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Matrix/Element", "Inverse of Matrix Product", "Inverse of ...
proofwiki-23560
Eigenvalues of Anti-Hermitian Matrix are Imaginary
The eigenvalues of an anti-Hermitian matrix are imaginary.
Let $\mathbf H$ be an anti-Hermitian matrix. Let $\lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $\mathbf H$. Let $\mathbf v$ be a eigenvector of $\mathbf H$ associated with $\lambda$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lambda \innerprod {\mathbf v} {\mathbf v} | r = \innerprod {\lambda \mathbf v} {\mathbf v} | c = Inner Produ...
The [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalues]] of an [[Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix|anti-Hermitian matrix]] are [[Definition:Wholly Imaginary|imaginary]].
Let $\mathbf H$ be an [[Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix|anti-Hermitian matrix]]. Let $\lambda$ be an [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf H$. Let $\mathbf v$ be a [[Definition:Eigenvector|eigenvector]] of $\mathbf H$ associated with $\lambda$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lambda \innerprod {\mathbf ...
Eigenvalues of Anti-Hermitian Matrix are Imaginary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Anti-Hermitian_Matrix_are_Imaginary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Anti-Hermitian_Matrix_are_Imaginary
[ "Anti-Hermitian Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary" ]
[ "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix", "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Eigenvector", "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Hermitian Conjugate is Adjoint", "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Definition:Eigenvector", "Definition:Zero Vector", "Definition:Inner Product", "Complex Number equals Negative...
proofwiki-23561
Spectral Theorem for Anti-Hermitian Matrices
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix over $\mathbb C$. Then $\mathbf A$ is anti-Hermitian {{Iff}} it is diagonalizable to an imaginary diagonal matrix via a unitary transformation. That is, we can write: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger$ where: :$\mathbf D$ is an imaginary diagonal matrix :$\mathbf U$ ...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be diagonalizable to a imaginary diagonal matrix via a unitary transformation. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \paren {\mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger}^\dagger }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf U \mathbf D^\dagger \mathbf U^\dagger | c = Hermitian Co...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] over $\mathbb C$. Then $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix|anti-Hermitian]] {{Iff}} it is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] to an [[Definition:Wholly Imaginary|imaginary]] [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] via ...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] to a [[Definition:Wholly Imaginary|imaginary]] [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] via a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\dagger | r = ...
Spectral Theorem for Anti-Hermitian Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Anti-Hermitian_Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Anti-Hermitian_Matrices
[ "Spectral Theorems", "Anti-Hermitian Matrices", "Diagonalizable Matrices", "Unitary Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Def...
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Hermitian Conjugate of Matrix Product", "Hermitian Conjugate is Involution", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix",...
proofwiki-23562
Real Anti-Symmetric Matrix is Anti-Hermitian
A real anti-symmetric matrix is anti-Hermitian.
Let $\mathbf A$ be a real anti-symmetric matrix. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \mathbf A^\intercal | c = $\mathbf A$ is real }} {{eqn | r = -\mathbf A | c = {{Defof|Anti-Symmetric Matrix}} }} {{end-eqn}} Therefore, $\mathbf A$ is anti-Hermitian. {{qed}} Category:Antisymmetric...
A [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Anti-Symmetric Matrix|anti-symmetric matrix]] is [[Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix|anti-Hermitian]].
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Anti-Symmetric Matrix|anti-symmetric matrix]]. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf A^\dagger | r = \mathbf A^\intercal | c = $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] }} {{eqn | r = -\mathbf A | c = {{Defof|Anti-Symmetric Matr...
Real Anti-Symmetric Matrix is Anti-Hermitian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Anti-Symmetric_Matrix_is_Anti-Hermitian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Anti-Symmetric_Matrix_is_Anti-Hermitian
[ "Antisymmetric Matrices", "Anti-Hermitian Matrices", "Real Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Antisymmetric Matrix", "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Antisymmetric Matrix", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix", "Category:Antisymmetric Matrices", "Category:Anti-Hermitian Matrices", "Category:Real Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23563
Eigenvalues of Real Anti-Symmetric Matrix are Imaginary
The eigenvalues of a real anti-symmetric matrix are imaginary.
Follows directly from Real Anti-Symmetric Matrix is Anti-Hermitian and Eigenvalues of Anti-Hermitian Matrix are Imaginary. {{qed}} Category:Real Matrices Category:Antisymmetric Matrices Category:Anti-Hermitian Matrices Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrices Category:Eigenvalues of Real Square Matrices d2d60pq8lcwy5wh6...
The [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalues]] of a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Anti-Symmetric Matrix|anti-symmetric matrix]] are [[Definition:Wholly Imaginary|imaginary]].
Follows directly from [[Real Anti-Symmetric Matrix is Anti-Hermitian]] and [[Eigenvalues of Anti-Hermitian Matrix are Imaginary]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Real Matrices]] [[Category:Antisymmetric Matrices]] [[Category:Anti-Hermitian Matrices]] [[Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrices]] [[Category:Eigenvalues of Real Squa...
Eigenvalues of Real Anti-Symmetric Matrix are Imaginary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Real_Anti-Symmetric_Matrix_are_Imaginary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Real_Anti-Symmetric_Matrix_are_Imaginary
[ "Real Matrices", "Antisymmetric Matrices", "Anti-Hermitian Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Real Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Antisymmetric Matrix", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary" ]
[ "Real Anti-Symmetric Matrix is Anti-Hermitian", "Eigenvalues of Anti-Hermitian Matrix are Imaginary", "Category:Real Matrices", "Category:Antisymmetric Matrices", "Category:Anti-Hermitian Matrices", "Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrices", "Category:Eigenvalues of Real Square Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23564
Spectral Theorem for Real Anti-Symmetric Matrices
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix over $\R$. Then $\mathbf A$ is anti-symmetric {{Iff}} it is diagonalizable to an imaginary diagonal matrix via a unitary transformation. That is, we can write: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger$ where: :$\mathbf D$ is an imaginary diagonal matrix :$\mathbf U$ is a un...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be diagonalizable to an imaginary diagonal matrix via a unitary transformation. From Spectral Theorem for Anti-Hermitian Matrices, $\mathbf A$ is anti-Hermitian. Thus: :$\mathbf A^\dagger = -\mathbf A$ Since $\mathbf A$ is real, $\mathbf A^\dagger = \mathbf A^\intercal$. Thus: :$\...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] over $\R$. Then $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Anti-Symmetric Matrix|anti-symmetric]] {{Iff}} it is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] to an [[Definition:Wholly Imaginary|imaginary]] [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] via a [[Def...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] to an [[Definition:Wholly Imaginary|imaginary]] [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] via a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]]. From [[Spectral Theorem for Anti-Hermitian Matrices]], $\math...
Spectral Theorem for Real Anti-Symmetric Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Real_Anti-Symmetric_Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Real_Anti-Symmetric_Matrices
[ "Spectral Theorems", "Antisymmetric Matrices", "Diagonalizable Matrices", "Unitary Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Antisymmetric Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Defi...
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Complex Number/Wholly Imaginary", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Spectral Theorem for Anti-Hermitian Matrices", "Definition:Anti-Hermitian Matrix", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Antisymmetric Matrix", "Defin...
proofwiki-23565
Eigenvalues of Real Orthogonal Matrix have Unit Modulus and occur in Conjugate Pairs
Let $\mathbf R$ be a real orthogonal matrix. Let $\lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $\mathbf R$. Then: :$\size \lambda = 1$ and :$\overline \lambda$ is also an eigenvalue
From Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary, $\mathbf R$ is unitary. From Eigenvalues of Unitary Matrix have Unit Modulus: :$\size \lambda = 1$ We have that $\mathbf R$ is real. From Complex Eigenvalues of Real Matrix occur in Conjugate Pairs, $\overline {\mathbf \lambda}$ is also an eigenvalue. {{qed}} Category:Orthogonal ...
Let $\mathbf R$ be a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]] [[Definition:Orthogonal Matrix|orthogonal matrix]]. Let $\lambda$ be an [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf R$. Then: :$\size \lambda = 1$ and :$\overline \lambda$ is also an [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalue]]
From [[Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary]], $\mathbf R$ is [[Definition:Unitary Matrix|unitary]]. From [[Eigenvalues of Unitary Matrix have Unit Modulus]]: :$\size \lambda = 1$ We have that $\mathbf R$ is [[Definition:Real Matrix|real]]. From [[Complex Eigenvalues of Real Matrix occur in Conjugate Pairs]], $\overli...
Eigenvalues of Real Orthogonal Matrix have Unit Modulus and occur in Conjugate Pairs
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Real_Orthogonal_Matrix_have_Unit_Modulus_and_occur_in_Conjugate_Pairs
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Real_Orthogonal_Matrix_have_Unit_Modulus_and_occur_in_Conjugate_Pairs
[ "Orthogonal Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices", "Eigenvalues of Real Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal Matrix", "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Eigenvalue" ]
[ "Real Orthogonal Matrix is Unitary", "Definition:Unitary Matrix", "Eigenvalues of Unitary Matrix have Unit Modulus", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Complex Eigenvalues of Real Matrix occur in Conjugate Pairs", "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Category:Orthogonal Matrices", "Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrice...
proofwiki-23566
Spectral Theorem for Real Orthogonal Matrices
Let $\mathbf A$ be a square matrix over $\R$. Then, $\mathbf A$ is orthogonal {{Iff}} it is diagonalizable via a unitary transformation to a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are of unit modulus which occur in conjugate pairs. That is, we can write: :$\mathbf A = \mathbf U \mathbf D \mathbf U^\dagger$ where :$\ma...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be a real matrix that is diagonalizable via a unitary transformation to a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are of unit modulus which occur in conjugate pairs. From Spectral Theorem for Unitary Matrices, $\mathbf A$ is unitary. Since $\mathbf A$ is real: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn ...
Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] over $\R$. Then, $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Orthogonal Matrix|orthogonal]] {{Iff}} it is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] via a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]] to a [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal mat...
=== Necessary Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real matrix]] that is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] via a [[Definition:Unitary Transformation|unitary transformation]] to a [[Definition:Diagonal Matrix|diagonal matrix]] whose [[Definition:Main Diagonal|diagonal elements]] are ...
Spectral Theorem for Real Orthogonal Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Real_Orthogonal_Matrices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Spectral_Theorem_for_Real_Orthogonal_Matrices
[ "Spectral Theorems", "Orthogonal Matrices", "Diagonalizable Matrices", "Unitary Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Orthogonal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Unit (One)", "Definition:Complex Modulus", "Definition:Complex Conjugate", "Defin...
[ "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Unitary Transformation", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Diagonal/Main", "Definition:Unit (One)", "Definition:Complex Modulus", "Definition:Complex Conjugate", "Spectral Theorem for Unitary Matrices", "Defin...
proofwiki-23567
Complex Eigenvalues of Real Matrix occur in Conjugate Pairs
The complex eigenvalues of a real matrix occur in conjugate pairs. That is, if $\lambda$ is a complex eigenvalues of a real matrix, then so is the complex conjugate $\overline \lambda$.
By definition, the eigenvalues of a matrix are the roots of its characteristic polynomial. The characteristic polynomial of a real matrix has real coefficients. From Complex Roots of Polynomial with Real Coefficients occur in Conjugate Pairs, the complex eigenvalues come in conjugate pairs. {{qed}} Category:Eigenvalues...
The [[Definition:Complex Number|complex]] [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalues]] of a [[Definition:Real Matrix|real matrix]] occur in [[Definition:Complex Conjugate|conjugate]] pairs. That is, if $\lambda$ is a [[Definition:Complex Number|complex]] [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalues]] of a [[Definition:Real Matrix|rea...
By definition, the [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalues]] of a [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] are the [[Definition:Root of Polynomial|roots]] of its [[Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix|characteristic polynomial]]. The [[Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix|characteristic polynomial]] of a [[Definit...
Complex Eigenvalues of Real Matrix occur in Conjugate Pairs
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Eigenvalues_of_Real_Matrix_occur_in_Conjugate_Pairs
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complex_Eigenvalues_of_Real_Matrix_occur_in_Conjugate_Pairs
[ "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices", "Real Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Complex Conjugate", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Complex Conjugate" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Matrix", "Definition:Root of Polynomial", "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Definition:Characteristic Polynomial of Matrix", "Definition:Real Matrix", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Coefficient of Polynomial", "Complex Roots of Polynomial ...
proofwiki-23568
Expected Number of Rolls until Two Consecutive Heads
Let $0 < p \le 1$. Consider a coin such that we toss a head with probability $p$. We repeatedly toss this coin until we observe two consecutive heads. The expected number of tosses until we observe two consecutive heads is: :$\ds \frac 1 p + \frac 1 {p^2}$
Let $E$ be the expected number of tosses until we observe two consecutive heads. Let $E_H$ be the expected number of further tosses until we observe two consecutive heads given that our previous toss is a head. Let $q = 1 - p$. By the Total Expectation Theorem, we have: :$E = p \expect {\text {number of tosses until t...
Let $0 < p \le 1$. Consider a [[Definition:Coin|coin]] such that we [[Definition:Coin-Tossing|toss]] a [[Definition:Head of Coin|head]] with [[Definition:Probability|probability]] $p$. We repeatedly toss this [[Definition:Coin|coin]] until we observe two consecutive [[Definition:Head of Coin|heads]]. The [[Definiti...
Let $E$ be the [[Definition:Expected Value|expected number]] of [[Definition:Coin-Tossing|tosses]] until we observe two consecutive [[Definition:Head of Coin|heads]]. Let $E_H$ be the [[Definition:Expected Value|expected number]] of further [[Definition:Coin-Tossing|tosses]] until we observe two consecutive [[Definiti...
Expected Number of Rolls until Two Consecutive Heads
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expected_Number_of_Rolls_until_Two_Consecutive_Heads
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expected_Number_of_Rolls_until_Two_Consecutive_Heads
[ "Combinatorics", "Coins" ]
[ "Definition:Coin", "Definition:Coin/Coin-Tossing", "Definition:Coin/Head", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Coin", "Definition:Coin/Head", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Coin/Coin-Tossing", "Definition:Coin/Head" ]
[ "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Coin/Coin-Tossing", "Definition:Coin/Head", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Coin/Coin-Tossing", "Definition:Coin/Head", "Total Expectation Theorem", "Definition:Coin/Head", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Coin/Head", "Definition:Coin/Tail", "To...
proofwiki-23569
Probability that Uniformly Selected Subset contains Particular Element
Let $X$ be a finite set. Let $\powerset X$ be the power set of $X$. Give $\powerset X$ the discrete uniform distribution, so that: :$\ds \map \Pr {\set A} = 2^{-n}$ for each $A \in \powerset X$. Let $x \in X$. Then: :$\ds \map \Pr {\set {A \in \powerset X : x \in A} } = \frac 1 2$
We count the cardinality of $\set {A \in \powerset X : x \in A}$. All sets $C \in \set {A \in \powerset X : x \in A}$ can be written uniquely in the form $\set x \cup B$, where $B \in \powerset {A \setminus \set x}$. In particular, $B = C \setminus \set x$. From Cardinality of Power Set of Finite Set, we have $\card {...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]]. Let $\powerset X$ be the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $X$. Give $\powerset X$ the [[Definition:Discrete Uniform Distribution|discrete uniform distribution]], so that: :$\ds \map \Pr {\set A} = 2^{-n}$ for each $A \in \powerset X$. Let $x \in X$. Then: :$\...
We count the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $\set {A \in \powerset X : x \in A}$. All [[Definition:Set|sets]] $C \in \set {A \in \powerset X : x \in A}$ can be written uniquely in the form $\set x \cup B$, where $B \in \powerset {A \setminus \set x}$. In particular, $B = C \setminus \set x$. From [[Cardi...
Probability that Uniformly Selected Subset contains Particular Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_that_Uniformly_Selected_Subset_contains_Particular_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_that_Uniformly_Selected_Subset_contains_Particular_Element
[ "Probability", "Power Set" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Discrete" ]
[ "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Set", "Cardinality of Power Set of Finite Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Discrete", "Category:Probability", "Category:Power Set" ]
proofwiki-23570
Expected Sum of Randomly Drawn Subset
Let $n$ be a positive integer. Let $\sqbrk n = \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}$ be the set of integers between $1$ and $n$. Equip $\powerset {\sqbrk n}$ with the discrete uniform distribution. Let $\map \Sigma S$ be the sum of a subset $S \in \powerset {\sqbrk n}$. Then: :$\ds \expect {\map \Sigma S} = \frac {n \paren {n + 1} }...
For each $k \in \sqbrk n$, define $1_k : \powerset {\sqbrk n} \to \set {0, 1}$ by: :$\ds \map {1_k} A = \begin{cases}1 & k \in A \\ 0 & k \not \in A\end{cases}$ for each $A \in \powerset {\sqbrk n}$. We can then write: :$\ds \map \Sigma S = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k \map {1_k} S$ From Expectation is Linear, we have: :$\...
Let $n$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Let $\sqbrk n = \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] between $1$ and $n$. Equip $\powerset {\sqbrk n}$ with the [[Definition:Discrete Uniform Distribution|discrete uniform distribution]]. Let $\map \Sig...
For each $k \in \sqbrk n$, define $1_k : \powerset {\sqbrk n} \to \set {0, 1}$ by: :$\ds \map {1_k} A = \begin{cases}1 & k \in A \\ 0 & k \not \in A\end{cases}$ for each $A \in \powerset {\sqbrk n}$. We can then write: :$\ds \map \Sigma S = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^n k \map {1_k} S$ From [[Expectation is Linear]], we hav...
Expected Sum of Randomly Drawn Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expected_Sum_of_Randomly_Drawn_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expected_Sum_of_Randomly_Drawn_Subset
[ "Probability", "Power Set" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Uniform Distribution/Discrete", "Definition:Sum", "Definition:Subset" ]
[ "Expectation is Linear", "Integral of Characteristic Function", "Probability that Uniformly Selected Subset contains Particular Element", "Sum of Arithmetic Sequence", "Category:Probability", "Category:Power Set" ]
proofwiki-23571
Expected Number of Trials Until N Consecutive Successes
Let $0 < p \le 1$. Let $N$ be a positive integer. We conduct an experiment with probability of success $p$. We run this experiment until we see $N$ consecutive successes. Then the expected number of trials until we see $N$ consecutive successes is: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^N p^{-k} = \frac 1 p + \frac 1 {p^2} + \ldo...
Let $E_N$ be the expected number of trials until we see $N$ consecutive successes. We look to form a recurrence relation for $E_N$ with $N > 1$. First, we run the experiment until we see $N$ consecutive successes. In expectation, this will take $E_{N - 1}$ trials. There is a probability $p$ that our next trial will su...
Let $0 < p \le 1$. Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. We conduct an [[Definition:Experiment|experiment]] with [[Definition:Probability|probability]] of success $p$. We run this [[Definition:Experiment|experiment]] until we see $N$ consecutive successes. Then the [[Definition:Expected V...
Let $E_N$ be the [[Definition:Expected Value|expected number]] of [[Definition:Trial|trials]] until we see $N$ consecutive successes. We look to form a [[Definition:Recurrence Relation|recurrence relation]] for $E_N$ with $N > 1$. First, we run the [[Definition:Experiment|experiment]] until we see $N$ consecutive su...
Expected Number of Trials Until N Consecutive Successes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expected_Number_of_Trials_Until_N_Consecutive_Successes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Expected_Number_of_Trials_Until_N_Consecutive_Successes
[ "Expectation" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Experiment" ]
[ "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Recursive Sequence/Recurrence Relation", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Experiment", "Definition:Expectation", "Definition:Pr...
proofwiki-23572
Probability that Three Dice are Rolled in Strictly Increasing Order
Roll three fair six-sided dice one by one, recording the upwards face each time. The probability that the dice were rolled with upwards face in strictly increasing order is $5/54$.
Let $X_1, X_2, X_3$ be the values of the three rolls. Let $E$ be the event that: :$X_1 < X_2 < X_3$ Let $E'$ be the event that: :$X_1$, $X_2$ and $X_3$ are all distinct. By Bayes' Theorem, we have: :$\map \Pr E = \map \Pr {E \cap E'} = \map \Pr {E \mid E'} \map \Pr {E'}$ since $E' \subseteq E$. Given that $X_1$, $X_2$...
Roll three [[Definition:Fair Die|fair]] [[Definition:Dice|six-sided dice]] one by one, recording the [[Definition:Polyhedron/Face|upwards face]] each time. The [[Definition:Probability|probability]] that the [[Definition:Dice|dice]] were rolled with [[Definition:Polyhedron/Face|upwards face]] in [[Definition:Strictl...
Let $X_1, X_2, X_3$ be the values of the three rolls. Let $E$ be the [[Definition:Event|event]] that: :$X_1 < X_2 < X_3$ Let $E'$ be the [[Definition:Event|event]] that: :$X_1$, $X_2$ and $X_3$ are all distinct. By [[Bayes' Theorem]], we have: :$\map \Pr E = \map \Pr {E \cap E'} = \map \Pr {E \mid E'} \map \Pr {E'}...
Probability that Three Dice are Rolled in Strictly Increasing Order
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_that_Three_Dice_are_Rolled_in_Strictly_Increasing_Order
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Probability_that_Three_Dice_are_Rolled_in_Strictly_Increasing_Order
[ "Probability", "Dice" ]
[ "Definition:Fair/Die", "Definition:Die", "Definition:Polyhedron/Face", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Die", "Definition:Polyhedron/Face", "Definition:Strictly Increasing/Sequence" ]
[ "Definition:Event", "Definition:Event", "Bayes' Theorem", "Definition:Permutation", "Number of Permutations of All Elements", "Definition:Independent Events", "Bayes' Theorem", "Definition:Probability", "Definition:Probability", "Category:Probability", "Category:Dice" ]
proofwiki-23573
Similar Matrices have Same Eigenvalues
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be similar matrices. Then, every eigenvalue of $\mathbf A$ is an eigenvalue of $\mathbf B$ and vice versa.
Follows directly from Similar Matrices have Same Characteristic Polynomial. {{qed}} Category:Matrix Similarity Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrices ssyzamawrcyxcndurnqnrs02l2u8n3x
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be [[Definition:Matrix Similarity|similar matrices]]. Then, every [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf A$ is an [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf B$ and vice versa.
Follows directly from [[Similar Matrices have Same Characteristic Polynomial]]. {{qed}} [[Category:Matrix Similarity]] [[Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrices]] ssyzamawrcyxcndurnqnrs02l2u8n3x
Similar Matrices have Same Eigenvalues
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Similar_Matrices_have_Same_Eigenvalues
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Similar_Matrices_have_Same_Eigenvalues
[ "Matrix Similarity", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix Similarity", "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Eigenvalue" ]
[ "Similar Matrices have Same Characteristic Polynomial", "Category:Matrix Similarity", "Category:Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
proofwiki-23574
Euler Phi Function of Power Minus One is Divisible by Exponent
Let $a, n \in \Z$ with $a \ge 2$ and $n \ge 1$. Then: :$n \divides \map \phi {a^n - 1}$ where $\phi$ is the Euler phi function.
Clearly: :$a^n = \paren {a^n - 1} + 1$ By definition of congruence: :$a^n \equiv 1 \pmod {a^n - 1}$ From Power Function on Base Greater than One is Strictly Increasing: :$\forall m \in \Z: 0 < m < n \implies 1 < a^m < a^n$ So $n$ is the multiplicative order of $a$ modulo $a^n - 1$. The result follows from {{Corollary|I...
Let $a, n \in \Z$ with $a \ge 2$ and $n \ge 1$. Then: :$n \divides \map \phi {a^n - 1}$ where $\phi$ is the [[Definition:Euler Phi Function|Euler phi function]].
Clearly: :$a^n = \paren {a^n - 1} + 1$ By definition of [[Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)|congruence]]: :$a^n \equiv 1 \pmod {a^n - 1}$ From [[Power Function on Base Greater than One is Strictly Increasing/Positive Integer|Power Function on Base Greater than One is Strictly Increasing]]: :$\forall m \in \Z: 0 <...
Euler Phi Function of Power Minus One is Divisible by Exponent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler_Phi_Function_of_Power_Minus_One_is_Divisible_by_Exponent
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euler_Phi_Function_of_Power_Minus_One_is_Divisible_by_Exponent
[ "Euler Phi Function" ]
[ "Definition:Euler Phi Function" ]
[ "Definition:Congruence (Number Theory)", "Power Function on Base Greater than One is Strictly Increasing/Positive Integer", "Definition:Multiplicative Order of Integer", "Category:Euler Phi Function" ]
proofwiki-23575
Determinant Equals Product of Eigenvalues
Let $\mathbf M$ be a square matrix over $\C$ of order $n$. Let $\tuple {\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n}$ be the eigenvalues of $\mathbf M$ including algebraic multiplicity. Then: :$\ds \map \det {\mathbf M} = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \lambda_i$
The eigenvalues of $\mathbf M$ are the roots of its characteristic equation. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \det {\lambda \mathbf I - \mathbf M} | r = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\lambda - \lambda_i} | c = Polynomial Factor Theorem }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \map \det {-\mathbf M} |...
Let $\mathbf M$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] over $\C$ of [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] $n$. Let $\tuple {\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n}$ be the [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalues]] of $\mathbf M$ including [[Definition:Algebraic Multiplicity|algebraic multiplicity]]. Then: :$\ds...
The [[Definition:Eigenvalue|eigenvalues]] of $\mathbf M$ are the [[Definition:Root of Polynomial|roots]] of its [[Definition:Characteristic Equation of Matrix|characteristic equation]]. Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \det {\lambda \mathbf I - \mathbf M} | r = \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\lambda - \lamb...
Determinant Equals Product of Eigenvalues/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Determinant_Equals_Product_of_Eigenvalues
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Determinant_Equals_Product_of_Eigenvalues/Proof_2
[ "Determinant Equals Product of Eigenvalues", "Determinants", "Eigenvalues of Square Matrices" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Algebraic Multiplicity" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvalue", "Definition:Root of Polynomial", "Definition:Characteristic Equation of Matrix", "Polynomial Factor Theorem", "Determinant of Matrix Multiplied by Constant" ]
proofwiki-23576
Similar Matrices have Same Rank
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be similar square matrices of order $n$ over a field $\mathbb F$. Then: :$\map \rho {\mathbf A} = \map \rho {\mathbf B}$ where :$\map \rho {\mathbf A}$ is the rank of $\mathbf A$
=== Full Rank Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be full rank: :$\map \rho {\mathbf A} = n$ Then, by Square Matrix has Full Rank iff Nonsingular, $\mathbf A$ is nonsingular. Therefore: :$\map \det {\mathbf A} \neq 0$ From Similar Matrices have Same Determinant: :$\map \det {\mathbf A} = \map \det {\mathbf B}$ Thus: :$\map \det {...
Let $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ be [[Definition:Matrix Similarity|similar]] [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrices]] of [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] $n$ over a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] $\mathbb F$. Then: :$\map \rho {\mathbf A} = \map \rho {\mathbf B}$ where :$\map \rho {\mathbf A}$ i...
=== Full Rank Case === Let $\mathbf A$ be [[Definition:Full Rank|full rank]]: :$\map \rho {\mathbf A} = n$ Then, by [[Square Matrix has Full Rank iff Nonsingular]], $\mathbf A$ is [[Definition:Nonsingular Matrix|nonsingular]]. Therefore: :$\map \det {\mathbf A} \neq 0$ From [[Similar Matrices have Same Determinan...
Similar Matrices have Same Rank
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Similar_Matrices_have_Same_Rank
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Similar_Matrices_have_Same_Rank
[ "Rank of Matrix", "Matrix Similarity" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix Similarity", "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Rank/Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Full Rank", "Square Matrix has Full Rank iff Nonsingular", "Definition:Nonsingular Matrix", "Similar Matrices have Same Determinant", "Definition:Nonsingular Matrix", "Definition:Full Rank", "Definition:Nonsingular Matrix" ]
proofwiki-23577
Determinant of Matrix Multiplied by Constant
Let $\mathbf M$ be a square matrix of order $n$ over a field $\mathbb F$. Let $k$ be a scalar in $\mathbb F$. Then: :$\map \det {k \mathbf M} = k^n \map \det {\mathbf M}$
For $1 \le i \le n$, let $e_i$ be the elementary row operation that multiplies row $i$ of $\mathbf A$ by $k$. By definition of the scalar product, $k \mathbf A$ is obtained by multiplying every row of $\mathbf A$ by $k$. That is the same as applying $e_i$ to $\mathbf A$ for each of $i \in \set {1, 2, \ldots, n}$. Let $...
Let $\mathbf M$ be a [[Definition:Square Matrix|square matrix]] of [[Definition:Order of Matrix|order]] $n$ over a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] $\mathbb F$. Let $k$ be a [[Definition:Scalar|scalar]] in $\mathbb F$. Then: :$\map \det {k \mathbf M} = k^n \map \det {\mathbf M}$
For $1 \le i \le n$, let $e_i$ be the [[Definition:Elementary Row Operation|elementary row operation]] that [[Definition:Matrix Scalar Product|multiplies]] [[Definition:Row of Matrix|row]] $i$ of $\mathbf A$ by $k$. By definition of the [[Definition:Matrix Scalar Product|scalar product]], $k \mathbf A$ is obtained by ...
Determinant of Matrix Multiplied by Constant/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Determinant_of_Matrix_Multiplied_by_Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Determinant_of_Matrix_Multiplied_by_Constant/Proof_3
[ "Determinant of Matrix Multiplied by Constant", "Determinants" ]
[ "Definition:Matrix/Square Matrix", "Definition:Matrix/Order", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Scalar" ]
[ "Definition:Elementary Operation/Row", "Definition:Matrix Scalar Product", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Matrix Scalar Product", "Definition:Matrix Scalar Product", "Definition:Matrix/Row", "Definition:Elementary Matrix/Row Operation", "Determinant of Elementary Row Matrix/Scale Row", "Determ...
proofwiki-23578
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Forward Implication
:$\vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p}$
{{BeginTableau |\vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} }} {{Assumption |1|p \implies q}} {{Assumption |2|\neg q}} {{ModusTollens |3|1, 2|\neg p|1|2}} {{Implication |4|1|\neg q \implies \neg p|2|3}} {{Implication |5||\paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p}|1|4}...
:$\vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p}$
{{BeginTableau |\vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} }} {{Assumption |1|p \implies q}} {{Assumption |2|\neg q}} {{ModusTollens |3|1, 2|\neg p|1|2}} {{Implication |4|1|\neg q \implies \neg p|2|3}} {{Implication |5||\paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p}|1|4}...
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Forward Implication/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Forward_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Forward_Implication/Proof_1
[ "Rule of Transposition" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-23579
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Forward Implication
:$\vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p}$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables to the proposition. As can be seen by inspection, the truth value under the main connective is true for all boolean interpretations. :<nowiki>$\begin {array} {|ccc|c|ccccc|} \hline (p & \implies & q) & \implies & (\neg & q & \implies & \neg & p) \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F ...
:$\vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p}$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]] to the proposition. As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth value]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logic)|main connective]] is [[Definition:True|true]] for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. :<nowik...
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Forward Implication/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Forward_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Forward_Implication/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Rule of Transposition" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:True", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-23580
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Reverse Implication
:$\vdash \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} \implies \paren {p \implies q}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} \implies \paren {p \implies q} }} {{Assumption|1|\neg q \implies \neg p}} {{Assumption|2|p}} {{DoubleNegIntro|3|2|\neg \neg p|2}} {{ModusTollens|4|1, 2|\neg \neg q|1|3}} {{DoubleNegElimination|5|1, 2|q|4}} {{Implication|6|1|p \implies q|2|5}} {{Implication|7||\paren...
:$\vdash \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} \implies \paren {p \implies q}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} \implies \paren {p \implies q} }} {{Assumption|1|\neg q \implies \neg p}} {{Assumption|2|p}} {{DoubleNegIntro|3|2|\neg \neg p|2}} {{ModusTollens|4|1, 2|\neg \neg q|1|3}} {{DoubleNegElimination|5|1, 2|q|4}} {{Implication|6|1|p \implies q|2|5}} {{Implication|7||\paren...
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Reverse Implication/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Reverse_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Reverse_Implication/Proof_1
[ "Rule of Transposition" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-23581
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Reverse Implication
:$\vdash \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} \implies \paren {p \implies q}$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables to the proposition. As can be seen by inspection, the truth value under the main connective is is true for all boolean interpretations. :<nowiki>$\begin {array} {|ccccc|c|ccc|} \hline (\neg & q & \implies & \neg & p) & \implies & (p & \implies & q) \\ \hline \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & ...
:$\vdash \paren {\neg q \implies \neg p} \implies \paren {p \implies q}$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]] to the proposition. As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth value]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logic)|main connective]] is is [[Definition:True|true]] for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. :<no...
Rule of Transposition/Formulation 2/Reverse Implication/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Reverse_Implication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rule_of_Transposition/Formulation_2/Reverse_Implication/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Rule of Transposition" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:True", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-23582
Identity Mapping is Normal
The identity mapping is normal.
Follows directly from Identity Mapping is Hermitian and Hermitian Operator is Normal. Category:Identity Mappings Category:Normal Operators cy43ogpqgzu7rhz3l3qds6u6xh3z0f8
The [[Definition:Identity Mapping|identity mapping]] is [[Definition:Normal Operator|normal]].
Follows directly from [[Identity Mapping is Hermitian]] and [[Hermitian Operator is Normal]]. [[Category:Identity Mappings]] [[Category:Normal Operators]] cy43ogpqgzu7rhz3l3qds6u6xh3z0f8
Identity Mapping is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Mapping_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Mapping_is_Normal
[ "Identity Mappings", "Normal Operators", "Identity Mappings", "Normal Operators" ]
[ "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Normal Operator" ]
[ "Identity Mapping is Hermitian", "Hermitian Operator is Normal", "Category:Identity Mappings", "Category:Normal Operators" ]
proofwiki-23583
Adjoint is Conjugate Linear
Let $\HH$ and $\KK$ be Hilbert spaces over $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be the set of bounded linear transformations from $\HH$ to $\KK$. Let $A, B \in \map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be bounded linear transformations. Let $\lambda \in \mathbb F$ be a scalar. Then: :$\paren {A + \lambda B}^* = A^* + \bar ...
Let $x \in \HH$ and $y \in \KK$ be vectors. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \innerprod x {\paren {A + \lambda B}^* y} | r = \innerprod {\paren {A + \lambda B} x} y | c = {{Defof|Adjoint Linear Transformation}} }} {{eqn | r = \innerprod {A x + \lambda B x} y }} {{eqn | r = \innerprod {A x} y + \lambda \in...
Let $\HH$ and $\KK$ be [[Definition:Hilbert Space|Hilbert spaces]] over $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation|bounded linear transformations]] from $\HH$ to $\KK$. Let $A, B \in \map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be [[Definition:Bounded Lin...
Let $x \in \HH$ and $y \in \KK$ be [[Definition:Vector|vectors]]. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \innerprod x {\paren {A + \lambda B}^* y} | r = \innerprod {\paren {A + \lambda B} x} y | c = {{Defof|Adjoint Linear Transformation}} }} {{eqn | r = \innerprod {A x + \lambda B x} y }} {{eqn | r = \innerpro...
Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_is_Conjugate_Linear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_is_Conjugate_Linear/Proof_1
[ "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Conjugate Linear Mappings", "Adjoint Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Space", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Scalar/Vector Space", "Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation", "Definition:Complex Conjugate", "Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation", "Definition:...
[ "Definition:Vector", "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Inner Product is Sesquilinear", "Existence and Uniqueness of Adjoint" ]
proofwiki-23584
Adjoint is Conjugate Linear
Let $\HH$ and $\KK$ be Hilbert spaces over $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be the set of bounded linear transformations from $\HH$ to $\KK$. Let $A, B \in \map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be bounded linear transformations. Let $\lambda \in \mathbb F$ be a scalar. Then: :$\paren {A + \lambda B}^* = A^* + \bar ...
Let $\innerprod \cdot \cdot_\HH$ and $\innerprod \cdot \cdot_\KK$ be inner products on $\HH$ and $\KK$ respectively. === Lemma $1$ === {{:Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} === Lemma $2$ === {{:Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Lemma 2}}{{qed|lemma}} Thus: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {A + \lambda B}^* ...
Let $\HH$ and $\KK$ be [[Definition:Hilbert Space|Hilbert spaces]] over $\Bbb F \in \set {\R, \C}$. Let $\map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation|bounded linear transformations]] from $\HH$ to $\KK$. Let $A, B \in \map \BB {\HH, \KK}$ be [[Definition:Bounded Lin...
Let $\innerprod \cdot \cdot_\HH$ and $\innerprod \cdot \cdot_\KK$ be [[Definition:Inner Product|inner products]] on $\HH$ and $\KK$ respectively. === [[Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Lemma 1|Lemma $1$]] === {{:Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Lemma 1}}{{qed|lemma}} === [[Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Lemma 2|Lemma $2$]] === ...
Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_is_Conjugate_Linear
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_is_Conjugate_Linear/Proof_2
[ "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Conjugate Linear Mappings", "Adjoint Linear Transformations" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Space", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Bounded Linear Transformation", "Definition:Scalar/Vector Space", "Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation", "Definition:Complex Conjugate", "Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation", "Definition:...
[ "Definition:Inner Product", "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Lemma 1", "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear/Lemma 2" ]
proofwiki-23585
Operator is Normal iff Operator Minus Multiple of Identity Operator is Normal
Let $\HH$ be a Hilbert space. Let $\mathbf T: \HH \to \HH$ be a bounded linear operator. Let $\lambda$ be a scalar under $\HH$. Let $\mathbf I$ be the identity operator. Then $\mathbf T$ is normal {{iff}} $\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I$ is normal.
=== Sufficient Case === We have that $\mathbf T$ is normal. Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I} \paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I}^* | r = \paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I} \paren {\mathbf T^* - \overline \lambda \mathbf I^*} | c = Adjoint is Conjugate Linear...
Let $\HH$ be a [[Definition:Hilbert Space|Hilbert space]]. Let $\mathbf T: \HH \to \HH$ be a [[Definition:Bounded Linear Operator|bounded linear operator]]. Let $\lambda$ be a [[Definition:Scalar (Vector Space)|scalar]] under $\HH$. Let $\mathbf I$ be the [[Definition:Identity Operator|identity operator]]. Then $\...
=== Sufficient Case === We have that $\mathbf T$ is [[Definition:Normal Operator|normal]]. Therefore: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I} \paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I}^* | r = \paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I} \paren {\mathbf T^* - \overline \lambda \mathbf I^*} ...
Operator is Normal iff Operator Minus Multiple of Identity Operator is Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Operator_is_Normal_iff_Operator_Minus_Multiple_of_Identity_Operator_is_Normal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Operator_is_Normal_iff_Operator_Minus_Multiple_of_Identity_Operator_is_Normal
[ "Normal Operators" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Space", "Definition:Bounded Linear Operator", "Definition:Scalar/Vector Space", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Normal Operator", "Definition:Normal Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Normal Operator", "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Identity Mapping is Normal", "Identity Mapping is Hermitian", "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Definition:Normal Operator", "Definition:Normal Operator", "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Identity Mapping is Hermitian", "Definition:Normal ...
proofwiki-23586
Adjoint of Normal Operator has Same Eigenvectors and Complex Conjugated Eigenvalues
Let $\HH$ be a Hilbert space. Let $\mathbf T: \HH \to \HH$ be a normal operator. Let $\lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $\mathbf T$. Let $\mathbf v$ be a eigenvector of $\mathbf T$ associated with $\lambda$. Then, $\mathbf v$ is also an eigenvector of the adjoint $\mathbf T^*$ with an associated eigenvalue $\overline \lambd...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf {T v} | r = \lambda \mathbf v }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \mathbf 0 | r = \mathbf {T v} - \lambda \mathbf v }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = 0 | r = \norm {\paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I} \mathbf v} | c = Norm is positive...
Let $\HH$ be a [[Definition:Hilbert Space|Hilbert space]]. Let $\mathbf T: \HH \to \HH$ be a [[Definition:Normal Operator|normal operator]]. Let $\lambda$ be an [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Linear Operator|eigenvalue]] of $\mathbf T$. Let $\mathbf v$ be a [[Definition:Eigenvector of Linear Operator|eigenvector]] of $\...
We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \mathbf {T v} | r = \lambda \mathbf v }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = \mathbf 0 | r = \mathbf {T v} - \lambda \mathbf v }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = 0 | r = \norm {\paren {\mathbf T - \lambda \mathbf I} \mathbf v} | c = [[Definition:Nor...
Adjoint of Normal Operator has Same Eigenvectors and Complex Conjugated Eigenvalues
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_of_Normal_Operator_has_Same_Eigenvectors_and_Complex_Conjugated_Eigenvalues
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Adjoint_of_Normal_Operator_has_Same_Eigenvectors_and_Complex_Conjugated_Eigenvalues
[ "Normal Operators", "Eigenvectors of Linear Operators", "Eigenvalues of Linear Operators", "Adjoints" ]
[ "Definition:Hilbert Space", "Definition:Normal Operator", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Adjoint Linear Transformation", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Definition:Complex Conjugate" ]
[ "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Definition:Positive Definite (Ring)", "Operator is Normal iff Operator Minus Multiple of Identity Operator is Normal", "Characterization of Normal Operators", "Adjoint is Conjugate Linear", "Definition:Norm/Vector Space", "Definition:Positive Definite (Ring)", "Definit...
proofwiki-23587
Eigenvalues of Linear Operator Shifted by Scaled Identity Operator
Let $V$ be a vector space over a field $\mathbb F$. Let $A : V \to V$ be a linear operator. Let $s$ be a scalar in $\mathbb F$. Let $I$ be the identity operator on $V$. Then, the operator $T + s I$ has the same eigenvectors as $A$ with all eigenvalues shifted by $s$.
Let $\lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $A$. Let $v$ be an eigenvector of $A$ associated with $\lambda$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {T + s I} v | r = T v + s v }} {{eqn | r = \lambda v + s v }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\lambda + s} v }} {{end-eqn}} Therefore, $v$ is an eigenvector of $T + s I$ with a shifted ...
Let $V$ be a [[Definition:Vector Space|vector space]] over a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] $\mathbb F$. Let $A : V \to V$ be a [[Definition:Linear Operator|linear operator]]. Let $s$ be a [[Definition:Scalar (Vector Space)|scalar]] in $\mathbb F$. Let $I$ be the [[Definition:Identity Operator|identit...
Let $\lambda$ be an [[Definition:Eigenvalue of Linear Operator|eigenvalue]] of $A$. Let $v$ be an [[Definition:Eigenvector of Linear Operator|eigenvector]] of $A$ associated with $\lambda$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {T + s I} v | r = T v + s v }} {{eqn | r = \lambda v + s v }} {{eqn | r = \pare...
Eigenvalues of Linear Operator Shifted by Scaled Identity Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Linear_Operator_Shifted_by_Scaled_Identity_Operator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eigenvalues_of_Linear_Operator_Shifted_by_Scaled_Identity_Operator
[ "Linear Operators", "Eigenvalues of Linear Operators", "Identity Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Linear Operator", "Definition:Scalar/Vector Space", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Definition:Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator" ]
[ "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvector/Linear Operator", "Definition:Eigenvalue/Linear Operator", "Category:Linear Operators", "Category:Eigenvalues of Linear Operators", "Category:Identity Mappings" ]
proofwiki-23588
Eckmann-Hilton Argument
Let $S$ be a non-empty set. Let $\circ$ and $\ast$ be binary operations on $S$ such that: {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(\text a):|$\circ$ and $\ast$ have respective identity elements $e_\circ$ and $e_\ast$ in $S$}} {{item|(\text b):|$\forall a, b, c, d \in S: \paren {a \circ b} \ast \paren {c \circ d} {{=}} \paren {a \ast ...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = e_\circ | r = e_\circ \circ e_\circ | c = {{Defof|Identity Element}}: $e_\circ$ }} {{eqn | r = \paren {e_\circ \ast e_\ast} \circ \paren {e_\ast \ast e_\circ} | c = {{Defof|Identity Element}}: $e_\ast$ }} {{eqn | r = \paren {e_\circ \circ e_\ast} \ast \paren {e_\ast \circ e_\...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty set]]. Let $\circ$ and $\ast$ be [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] on $S$ such that: {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(\text a):|$\circ$ and $\ast$ have respective [[Definition:Identity Element|identity elements]] $e_\circ$ and $e_\ast$ in $S$}} {{item|(\text b...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = e_\circ | r = e_\circ \circ e_\circ | c = {{Defof|Identity Element}}: $e_\circ$ }} {{eqn | r = \paren {e_\circ \ast e_\ast} \circ \paren {e_\ast \ast e_\circ} | c = {{Defof|Identity Element}}: $e_\ast$ }} {{eqn | r = \paren {e_\circ \circ e_\ast} \ast \paren {e_\ast \circ e_\...
Eckmann-Hilton Argument
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eckmann-Hilton_Argument
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Eckmann-Hilton_Argument
[ "Commutative Monoids" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Equality of Mappings", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
proofwiki-23589
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \dashv \vdash p$
=== $(1):$ $\vdash$ Direction === {{:Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Forward Direction}}
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \dashv \vdash p$
=== $(1):$ [[Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Forward Direction|$\vdash$ Direction]] === {{:Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Forward Direction}}
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1
[ "Peirce's Law" ]
[]
[ "Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Forward Direction" ]
proofwiki-23590
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \dashv \vdash p$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables. As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the main connectives match for all boolean interpretations. :<nowiki>$\begin{array}{|ccccc||c|}\hline ((p & \implies & q) & \implies & p) & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \F & \F & \F \\ \F & \T & \T & \F & \F & \F \\ \T & \F & \F & \...
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \dashv \vdash p$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]. As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logic)|main connectives]] match for all [[Definition:Boolean Interpretation|boolean interpretations]]. :<nowiki>$\begin{array}{|ccccc||c|}\hline ((p ...
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Peirce's Law" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-23591
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Forward Direction
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \vdash p$
This is none other than Peirce's law itself, whose proof we transclude here: {{:Peirce's Law/Formulation 1/Proof 2}}
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \vdash p$
This is none other than [[Peirce's Law/Formulation 1|Peirce's law]] itself, whose [[Peirce's Law/Formulation 1/Proof 2|proof]] we transclude here: {{:Peirce's Law/Formulation 1/Proof 2}}
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Forward Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1/Forward_Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1/Forward_Direction
[ "Peirce's Law" ]
[]
[ "Peirce's Law/Formulation 1", "Peirce's Law/Formulation 1/Proof 2" ]
proofwiki-23592
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Reverse Direction
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \dashv p$
{{BeginTableau|p \vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies p}} {{Premise|1|p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies p|1|True Statement is implied by Every Statement}} {{EndTableau|qed}}
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \dashv p$
{{BeginTableau|p \vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies p}} {{Premise|1|p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies p|1|[[True Statement is implied by Every Statement]]}} {{EndTableau|qed}}
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Reverse Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1/Reverse_Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_1/Reverse_Direction
[ "Peirce's Law", "Peirce's Law" ]
[]
[ "True Statement is implied by Every Statement" ]
proofwiki-23593
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 2/Forward Direction
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \implies p$
This is none other than Peirce's law itself, whose proof we transclude here: {{:Peirce's Law/Formulation 2/Proof 1}}
:$\paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} \implies p$
This is none other than [[Peirce's Law/Formulation 2|Peirce's law]] itself, whose [[Peirce's Law/Formulation 2/Proof 1|proof]] we transclude here: {{:Peirce's Law/Formulation 2/Proof 1}}
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 2/Forward Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_2/Forward_Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_2/Forward_Direction
[ "Peirce's Law", "Peirce's Law" ]
[]
[ "Peirce's Law/Formulation 2", "Peirce's Law/Formulation 2/Proof 1" ]
proofwiki-23594
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 2/Reverse Direction
:$\vdash p \implies \paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash p \implies \paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} }} {{Assumption|1|p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies p|1|Peirce's Law Strong Form: Formulation 1: $p \vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies p$}} {{Implication|3||p \implies \paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p}|1|2}} {{EndT...
:$\vdash p \implies \paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p}$
{{BeginTableau|\vdash p \implies \paren {\paren {p \implies q} \implies p} }} {{Assumption|1|p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies p|1|[[Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Reverse Direction|Peirce's Law Strong Form: Formulation 1]]: $p \vdash \paren {p \implies q} \implies p$}} {{Implication|3||p \i...
Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 2/Reverse Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_2/Reverse_Direction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Peirce's_Law/Strong_Form/Formulation_2/Reverse_Direction
[ "Peirce's Law" ]
[]
[ "Peirce's Law/Strong Form/Formulation 1/Reverse Direction" ]
proofwiki-23595
(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p
:$\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p$
{{BeginTableau|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p}} {{Premise|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q}} {{Premise|2|q \implies p}} {{Assumption|3|\neg p}} {{ModusTollens|4|2,3|\neg q|2|3}} {{ModusTollens|5|1,2,3|\neg \paren {p \implies q}|1|4}} {{SequentIntro|6|3|p \implies q|3|False Statement implies E...
:$\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p$
{{BeginTableau|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p}} {{Premise|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q}} {{Premise|2|q \implies p}} {{Assumption|3|\neg p}} {{ModusTollens|4|2,3|\neg q|2|3}} {{ModusTollens|5|1,2,3|\neg \paren {p \implies q}|1|4}} {{SequentIntro|6|3|p \implies q|3|[[False Statement implies...
(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/(p_implies_q)_implies_q,_q_implies_p_therefore_p
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/(p_implies_q)_implies_q,_q_implies_p_therefore_p/Proof_1
[ "(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p", "Conditional" ]
[]
[ "False Statement implies Every Statement" ]
proofwiki-23596
(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p
:$\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p$
{{BeginTableau|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p}} {{Premise|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q}} {{Premise|2|q \implies p}} {{Assumption|3|\neg p}} {{ModusTollens|4|2, 3|\neg q|2|3}} {{ModusTollens|5|1, 2, 3|\neg \paren {p \implies q}|1|4}} {{Assumption|6|p}} {{NonContradiction|7|3, 6|3|6}} {{Exp...
:$\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p$
{{BeginTableau|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q, q \implies p \vdash p}} {{Premise|1|\paren {p \implies q} \implies q}} {{Premise|2|q \implies p}} {{Assumption|3|\neg p}} {{ModusTollens|4|2, 3|\neg q|2|3}} {{ModusTollens|5|1, 2, 3|\neg \paren {p \implies q}|1|4}} {{Assumption|6|p}} {{NonContradiction|7|3, 6|3|6}} {{Exp...
(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/(p_implies_q)_implies_q,_q_implies_p_therefore_p
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/(p_implies_q)_implies_q,_q_implies_p_therefore_p/Proof_2
[ "(p implies q) implies q, q implies p therefore p", "Conditional" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-23597
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 1
:$\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t {{=}} \mathbf A$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \map {\mathbf A} 0 }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A + 0 \mathbf P \mathbf E \mathbf P^{-1} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix 8op46iqjpu9w5ns2yycw7hlh6uevfs9
:$\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t {{=}} \mathbf A$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \map {\mathbf A} 0 }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A + 0 \mathbf P \mathbf E \mathbf P^{-1} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf A }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix]] 8op46iqjpu9w5ns2yycw7hlh6uevfs9
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_1
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix" ]
[]
[ "Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix" ]
proofwiki-23598
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 2
:$\map {\mathbf A} t$ is diagonalizable for all values of $t$
Let $\mathbf D = \mathbf P^{-1} \mathbf A \mathbf P$ be $\mathbf A$ diagonalized. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \mathbf A + t \mathbf P \mathbf E \mathbf P^{-1} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf P \mathbf D \mathbf P^{-1} + t \mathbf P \mathbf E \mathbf P^{-1} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf P \paren {\mathbf D ...
:$\map {\mathbf A} t$ is [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalizable]] for all values of $t$
Let $\mathbf D = \mathbf P^{-1} \mathbf A \mathbf P$ be $\mathbf A$ [[Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix|diagonalized]]. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\mathbf A} t | r = \mathbf A + t \mathbf P \mathbf E \mathbf P^{-1} }} {{eqn | r = \mathbf P \mathbf D \mathbf P^{-1} + t \mathbf P \mathbf E \mathbf P^{-1} }} {{...
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_2
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix" ]
[ "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Definition:Matrix Similarity", "Definition:Diagonal Matrix", "Definition:Diagonalizable Matrix", "Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix" ]
proofwiki-23599
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 4
:$\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map \sigma {\map {\mathbf A} t} {{=}} \map \sigma {\mathbf A}$
From a previous proof, we have that: :$\map {\mathbf A} t = \mathbf P \paren {\mathbf D + t \mathbf E} \mathbf P^{-1}$ where $\mathbf D = \mathbf P^{-1} \mathbf A \mathbf P$ Let $\varepsilon_i$ be the $i^{th}$ diagonal element of $\mathbf E$. By Characterization of Diagonalizable Matrices, the eigenvalues of $\map {\ma...
:$\ds \lim_{t \mathop \to 0} \map \sigma {\map {\mathbf A} t} {{=}} \map \sigma {\mathbf A}$
From [[Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 2|a previous proof]], we have that: :$\map {\mathbf A} t = \mathbf P \paren {\mathbf D + t \mathbf E} \mathbf P^{-1}$ where $\mathbf D = \mathbf P^{-1} \mathbf A \mathbf P$ Let $\varepsilon_i$ be the $i^{th}$ [[Definition:Diagonal Element|diagonal...
Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Simple_Spectrum_Approximation_of_Diagonalizable_Matrix/Property_4
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix" ]
[]
[ "Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix/Property 2", "Definition:Main Diagonal/Diagonal Elements", "Characterization of Diagonalizable Matrices", "Definition:Spectrum (Spectral Theory)/Square Matrix", "Category:Simple Spectrum Approximation of Diagonalizable Matrix" ]