id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-2900
Quotient Group is Group
Let $G$ be a group. Let $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Then the quotient group $G / N$ is indeed a group.
By Subgroup is Normal iff Left Cosets are Right Cosets, the set of left cosets for $N$ equals the set of right cosets. It follows that $G / N$ does not depend on whether left cosets are used to define it or right cosets. {{WLOG}}, we will work with the left cosets. By definition of quotient group, the elements of $G / ...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $N$ be a [[Definition:Normal Subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $G$. Then the [[Definition:Quotient Group|quotient group]] $G / N$ is indeed a [[Definition:Group|group]].
By [[Subgroup is Normal iff Left Cosets are Right Cosets]], the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Left Coset|left cosets]] for $N$ equals the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Right Coset|right cosets]]. It follows that $G / N$ does not depend on whether [[Definition:Left Coset|left cosets]] are used to defi...
Quotient Group is Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Group_is_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Group_is_Group
[ "Quotient Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Normal Subgroup", "Definition:Quotient Group", "Definition:Group" ]
[ "Subgroup is Normal iff Left Cosets are Right Cosets", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Coset/Left Coset", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Coset/Right Coset", "Definition:Coset/Left Coset", "Definition:Coset/Right Coset", "Definition:Coset/Left Coset", "Definition:Quotient Group", "Definition:Coset", ...
proofwiki-2901
Principal Ideal is Ideal
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a ring with unity. Let $a \in R$. Let $\ideal a$ be the principal ideal of $R$ generated by $a$. Then $\ideal a$ is an ideal of $R$.
First we establish that $\ideal a$ is an ideal of $R$, by verifying the conditions of Test for Ideal. $\ideal a \ne \O$, as $1_R \circ a = a \in \ideal a$. Let $x, y \in \ideal a$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \exists r, s \in R | l = x | r = r \circ a, y = s \circ a | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto ...
Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Ring with Unity|ring with unity]]. Let $a \in R$. Let $\ideal a$ be the [[Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring|principal ideal]] of $R$ generated by $a$. Then $\ideal a$ is an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $R$.
First we establish that $\ideal a$ is an [[Definition:Ideal of Ring|ideal]] of $R$, by verifying the conditions of [[Test for Ideal]]. $\ideal a \ne \O$, as $1_R \circ a = a \in \ideal a$. Let $x, y \in \ideal a$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \exists r, s \in R | l = x | r = r \circ a, y = s \circ...
Principal Ideal is Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principal_Ideal_is_Ideal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principal_Ideal_is_Ideal
[ "Ideal Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Ring with Unity", "Definition:Principal Ideal of Ring", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
[ "Definition:Ideal of Ring", "Test for Ideal", "Test for Ideal", "Definition:Ideal of Ring" ]
proofwiki-2902
Bézout's Theorem
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two plane projective curves defined over a field $F$ that do not have a common component. Then the total number of intersection points of $X$ and $Y$ with coordinates in an algebraically closed field $E$ which contains $F$, counted with their multiplicities, is equal to the product of the degrees of ...
The condition that $X$ and $Y$ have no common component is true if both $X$ and $Y$ are defined by different irreducible polynomials. In particular, it holds for a pair of "generic" curves. {{ExtractTheorem|Link to a proof of the above}} {{ProofWanted}}
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two [[Definition:Plane Projective Curve|plane projective curves]] defined over a [[Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)|field]] $F$ that do not have a common component. Then the total number of [[Definition:Intersection (Geometry)|intersection points]] of $X$ and $Y$ with [[Definition:Cartesian Coord...
The condition that $X$ and $Y$ have no common component is [[Definition:True|true]] if both $X$ and $Y$ are defined by different [[Definition:Irreducible Polynomial|irreducible polynomials]]. In particular, it holds for a pair of "generic" curves. {{ExtractTheorem|Link to a proof of the above}} {{ProofWanted}}
Bézout's Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bézout's_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bézout's_Theorem
[ "Bézout's Theorem", "Polynomial Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Plane Projective Curve", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Intersection (Geometry)", "Definition:Cartesian Coordinate System", "Definition:Algebraically Closed Field", "Definition:Multiplicity (Real Analysis)", "Definition:Degree of Polynomial" ]
[ "Definition:True", "Definition:Irreducible Polynomial" ]
proofwiki-2903
Forward Difference of Power
:$\Delta c^x = \paren {c - 1} c^x$ where $\Delta$ denotes the forward difference operator.
From the definitions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \Delta c^x | r = c^{x + 1} - c^x | c = {{Defof|Forward Difference Operator}} }} {{eqn | r = c \cdot c^x - c^x }} {{eqn | r = \paren {c - 1} c^x }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} Category:Finite Calculus m0tf2vwc49nhv5xfxhzhmznqqd9sidk
:$\Delta c^x = \paren {c - 1} c^x$ where $\Delta$ denotes the [[Definition:Forward Difference Operator|forward difference operator]].
From the definitions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \Delta c^x | r = c^{x + 1} - c^x | c = {{Defof|Forward Difference Operator}} }} {{eqn | r = c \cdot c^x - c^x }} {{eqn | r = \paren {c - 1} c^x }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}} [[Category:Finite Calculus]] m0tf2vwc49nhv5xfxhzhmznqqd9sidk
Forward Difference of Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Forward_Difference_of_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Forward_Difference_of_Power
[ "Finite Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Difference Operator/Forward Difference" ]
[ "Category:Finite Calculus" ]
proofwiki-2904
Forward Difference of Harmonic Number Function
Let $H_x$ denote the harmonic number function. Then: :$\Delta H_x = \dfrac 1 {x + 1}$ where $\Delta H_x$ denotes the forward difference operator.
From the definitions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \Delta H_x | r = H_{x + 1} - H_x | c = {{Defof|Forward Difference Operator}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{x + 1} \frac 1 k - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^x \frac 1 k | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^x \frac 1 k + \frac ...
Let $H_x$ denote the [[Definition:Harmonic Number|harmonic number function]]. Then: :$\Delta H_x = \dfrac 1 {x + 1}$ where $\Delta H_x$ denotes the [[Definition:Forward Difference Operator|forward difference operator]].
From the definitions: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \Delta H_x | r = H_{x + 1} - H_x | c = {{Defof|Forward Difference Operator}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{x + 1} \frac 1 k - \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^x \frac 1 k | c = {{Defof|Harmonic Number}} }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^x \frac 1 k + \frac...
Forward Difference of Harmonic Number Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Forward_Difference_of_Harmonic_Number_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Forward_Difference_of_Harmonic_Number_Function
[ "Finite Calculus", "Harmonic Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Harmonic Numbers", "Definition:Finite Difference Operator/Forward Difference" ]
[ "Category:Finite Calculus", "Category:Harmonic Numbers" ]
proofwiki-2905
Equality of Ordered Tuples
Let $a = \tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n}$ and $b = \tuple {b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n}$ be ordered tuples. Then: :$a = b \iff \forall i: 1 \le i \le n: a_i = b_i$ That is, for two ordered tuples to be equal, all the corresponding elements have to be equal.
Proof by induction: For all $n \in \N_{>0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n} = \tuple {b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n} \iff \forall i: 1 \le i \le n: a_i = b_i$ $\map P 1$ is true, as this just says $\tuple {a_1} = \tuple {b_1} \iff a_1 = b_1$ which is trivial.
Let $a = \tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n}$ and $b = \tuple {b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set|ordered tuples]]. Then: :$a = b \iff \forall i: 1 \le i \le n: a_i = b_i$ That is, for two [[Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set|ordered tuples]] to be [[Definition:Equal|equal]], all the...
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]: For all $n \in \N_{>0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n} = \tuple {b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n} \iff \forall i: 1 \le i \le n: a_i = b_i$ $\map P 1$ is true, as this just says $\tuple {a_1} = \tuple {...
Equality of Ordered Tuples
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equality_of_Ordered_Tuples
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equality_of_Ordered_Tuples
[ "Cartesian Product", "Equality of Ordered Tuples", "Equality" ]
[ "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordered Tuple as Ordered Set", "Definition:Equals", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Equals" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-2906
Zero of Power Set with Union
Let $S$ be a set and let $\powerset S$ be its power set. Consider the algebraic structure $\struct {\powerset S, \cup}$, where $\cup$ denotes set union. Then $S$ serves as the zero element for $\struct {\powerset S, \cup}$.
We note that by Set is Subset of Itself, $S \subseteq S$ and so $S \in \powerset S$ from the definition of the power set. From Union with Superset is Superset, we have: :$A \subseteq S \iff A \cup S = S = S \cup A$. By definition of power set: :$A \subseteq S \iff A \in \powerset S$ So: :$\forall A \in \powerset S: A \...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] and let $\powerset S$ be its [[Definition:Power Set|power set]]. Consider the [[Definition:Algebraic Structure|algebraic structure]] $\struct {\powerset S, \cup}$, where $\cup$ denotes [[Definition:Set Union|set union]]. Then $S$ serves as the [[Definition:Zero Element|zero elemen...
We note that by [[Set is Subset of Itself]], $S \subseteq S$ and so $S \in \powerset S$ from the definition of the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]]. From [[Union with Superset is Superset]], we have: :$A \subseteq S \iff A \cup S = S = S \cup A$. By definition of [[Definition:Power Set|power set]]: :$A \subseteq S \...
Zero of Power Set with Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Power_Set_with_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Power_Set_with_Union
[ "Set Union", "Power Set", "Zero Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Zero Element" ]
[ "Set is Subset of Itself", "Definition:Power Set", "Union with Superset is Superset", "Definition:Power Set" ]
proofwiki-2907
Zero of Power Set with Intersection
Let $S$ be a set and let $\powerset S$ be its power set. Consider the algebraic structure $\struct {\powerset S, \cap}$, where $\cap$ denotes set intersection. Then the empty set $\O$ serves as the zero element for $\struct {\powerset S, \cap}$.
From Empty Set is Element of Power Set: :$\O \in \powerset S$ From Intersection with Empty Set: :$\forall A \subseteq S: A \cap \O = \O = \O \cap A$ By definition of power set: :$A \subseteq S \iff A \in \powerset S$ So: :$\forall A \in \powerset S: A \cap \O = \O = \O \cap A$ Thus we see that $\O$ acts as the zero ele...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] and let $\powerset S$ be its [[Definition:Power Set|power set]]. Consider the [[Definition:Algebraic Structure|algebraic structure]] $\struct {\powerset S, \cap}$, where $\cap$ denotes [[Definition:Set Intersection|set intersection]]. Then the [[Definition:Empty Set|empty set]] $\...
From [[Empty Set is Element of Power Set]]: :$\O \in \powerset S$ From [[Intersection with Empty Set]]: :$\forall A \subseteq S: A \cap \O = \O = \O \cap A$ By definition of [[Definition:Power Set|power set]]: :$A \subseteq S \iff A \in \powerset S$ So: :$\forall A \in \powerset S: A \cap \O = \O = \O \cap A$ Thus ...
Zero of Power Set with Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Power_Set_with_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_of_Power_Set_with_Intersection
[ "Set Intersection", "Power Set", "Empty Set", "Zero Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Zero Element" ]
[ "Empty Set is Element of Power Set", "Intersection with Empty Set", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Zero Element" ]
proofwiki-2908
Strictly Positive Real Numbers under Multiplication form Uncountable Abelian Group
Let $\R_{>0}$ be the set of strictly positive real numbers: :$\R_{>0} = \set {x \in \R: x > 0}$ The structure $\struct {\R_{>0}, \times}$ is an uncountable abelian group.
From Strictly Positive Real Numbers under Multiplication form Subgroup of Non-Zero Real Numbers we have that $\struct {\R_{>0}, \times}$ is a subgroup of $\struct {\R_{\ne 0}, \times}$, where $\R_{\ne 0}$ is the set of real numbers without zero: :$\R_{\ne 0} = \R \setminus \set 0$ From Subgroup of Abelian Group is Abel...
Let $\R_{>0}$ be the set of [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|strictly positive real numbers]]: :$\R_{>0} = \set {x \in \R: x > 0}$ The [[Definition:Algebraic Structure with One Operation|structure]] $\struct {\R_{>0}, \times}$ is an [[Definition:Uncountable Group|uncountable]] [[Definition:Abelian Group|abel...
From [[Strictly Positive Real Numbers under Multiplication form Subgroup of Non-Zero Real Numbers]] we have that $\struct {\R_{>0}, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $\struct {\R_{\ne 0}, \times}$, where $\R_{\ne 0}$ is the set of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] without [[Definition:Zero (Number...
Strictly Positive Real Numbers under Multiplication form Uncountable Abelian Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Strictly_Positive_Real_Numbers_under_Multiplication_form_Uncountable_Abelian_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Strictly_Positive_Real_Numbers_under_Multiplication_form_Uncountable_Abelian_Group
[ "Real Multiplication", "Examples of Abelian Groups", "Examples of Infinite Groups" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Algebraic Structure/One Operation", "Definition:Infinite Group/Uncountable", "Definition:Abelian Group" ]
[ "Strictly Positive Real Numbers under Multiplication form Subgroup of Non-Zero Real Numbers", "Definition:Subgroup", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Zero (Number)", "Subgroup of Abelian Group is Abelian", "Definition:Abelian Group" ]
proofwiki-2909
Solution to Legendre's Differential Equation
The solution of Legendre's differential equation: {{:Definition:Legendre's Differential Equation}} is: :$\ds A \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\paren {2 n - 2 k} \paren {2 n - \paren {2 k - 1} } - p \paren {p + 1} } a_0 \frac {x^{2 n} } {2 n!} } + B \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\inft...
Begin with the ansatz: :$\ds y = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty a_n x^n$ Differentating {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$: :$\ds \dot y = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty a_n n x^{n - 1}$ :$\ds \ddot y = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty a_n n \paren {n - 1} x^{n - 2}$ Substituting in the original equation: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \pare...
The solution of [[Definition:Legendre's Differential Equation|Legendre's differential equation]]: {{:Definition:Legendre's Differential Equation}} is: :$\ds A \paren {\sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {\paren {2 n - 2 k} \paren {2 n - \paren {2 k - 1} } - p \paren {p + 1} } a_0 \frac {x^{2 n} ...
Begin with the [[Definition:Ansatz|ansatz]]: :$\ds y = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty a_n x^n$ [[Definition:Differentiation|Differentating]] {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$: :$\ds \dot y = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty a_n n x^{n - 1}$ :$\ds \ddot y = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty a_n n \paren {n - 1} x^{n - 2}$ Substitutin...
Solution to Legendre's Differential Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solution_to_Legendre's_Differential_Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Solution_to_Legendre's_Differential_Equation
[ "Legendre's Differential Equation", "Second Order ODEs" ]
[ "Definition:Legendre's Differential Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Ansatz", "Definition:Differentiation", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Summation", "Definition:Coefficient", "Definition:Term", "Definition:Recursive Sequence/Recurrence Relation", "Definition:Legendre's Differential Equation", "Def...
proofwiki-2910
Law of Mass Action
Let $\AA$ and $\BB$ be two chemical substances in a solution $C$ which are involved in a second-order reaction. Let $x$ grams of $\CC$ contain $a x$ grams of $\AA$ and $b x$ grams of $\BB$, where $a + b = 1$. Let there be $a A$ grams of $\AA$ and $b B$ grams of $\BB$ at time $t = t_0$, at which time $x = 0$. Then: :<no...
By the definition of a second-order reaction: :The rate of formation of $\CC$ is jointly proportional to the quantities of $\AA$ and $\BB$ which have not yet transformed. By definition of joint proportion: :$\dfrac {\d x} {\d t} \propto \paren {A - x} a \paren {B - x} b$ or: :$\dfrac {\d x} {\d t} = k a b \paren {A - x...
Let $\AA$ and $\BB$ be two [[Definition:Substance|chemical substances]] in a solution $C$ which are involved in a [[Definition:Second-Order Reaction|second-order reaction]]. Let $x$ [[Definition:Gram|grams]] of $\CC$ contain $a x$ [[Definition:Gram|grams]] of $\AA$ and $b x$ [[Definition:Gram|grams]] of $\BB$, where ...
By the definition of a [[Definition:Second-Order Reaction|second-order reaction]]: :The [[Definition:Rate|rate]] of formation of $\CC$ is [[Definition:Joint Proportion|jointly proportional]] to the quantities of $\AA$ and $\BB$ which have not yet transformed. By definition of [[Definition:Joint Proportion|joint prop...
Law of Mass Action
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Law_of_Mass_Action
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Law_of_Mass_Action
[ "Chemistry", "First Order ODEs", "Named Theorems" ]
[ "Definition:Substance", "Definition:Second-Order Reaction", "Definition:Metric System/Mass/Gram", "Definition:Metric System/Mass/Gram", "Definition:Metric System/Mass/Gram", "Definition:Metric System/Mass/Gram", "Definition:Metric System/Mass/Gram", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Con...
[ "Definition:Second-Order Reaction", "Definition:Rate", "Definition:Proportion/Joint", "Definition:Proportion/Joint", "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Constant", "Solution to Separable Differential Equation", "Definition:Partial Fractions Expansion", "Definition:Primitive (Calculus)/Con...
proofwiki-2911
Motion of Simple Pendulum
Consider a simple pendulum consisting of a bob whose mass is $m$, at the end of a rod of negligible mass of length $a$. Let the bob be pulled to one side so that the rod is at an angle $\alpha$ from the vertical and then released. Let $T$ be the time period of the simple pendulum, that is, the time through which the bo...
At a time $t$, let: :the rod be at an angle $\theta$ to the vertical :the bob be travelling at a speed $v$ :the displacement of the bob from where it is when the rod is vertical, along its line of travel, be $s$. :350px At its maximum displacement, the speed of the bob is $0$, so its kinetic energy is $0$. By the Princ...
Consider a [[Definition:Simple Pendulum|simple pendulum]] consisting of a [[Definition:Pendulum Bob|bob]] whose [[Definition:Mass|mass]] is $m$, at the end of a [[Definition:Rod|rod]] of negligible [[Definition:Mass|mass]] of [[Definition:Length (Linear Measure)|length]] $a$. Let the [[Definition:Pendulum Bob|bob]] be...
At a time $t$, let: :the [[Definition:Rod|rod]] be at an [[Definition:Angle|angle]] $\theta$ to [[Definition:Vertical|the vertical]] :the [[Definition:Pendulum Bob|bob]] be travelling at a [[Definition:Speed|speed]] $v$ :the [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]] of the [[Definition:Pendulum Bob|bob]] from where it i...
Motion of Simple Pendulum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Motion_of_Simple_Pendulum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Motion_of_Simple_Pendulum
[ "Mathematical Physics", "Simple Pendulums", "Complete Elliptic Integral of the First Kind" ]
[ "Definition:Pendulum/Simple", "Definition:Simple Pendulum/Bob", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Rod", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Linear Measure/Length", "Definition:Simple Pendulum/Bob", "Definition:Rod", "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Vertical", "Definition:Time Period", "Definition:Pendu...
[ "Definition:Rod", "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Vertical", "Definition:Simple Pendulum/Bob", "Definition:Speed", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Simple Pendulum/Bob", "Definition:Rod", "Definition:Vertical Line", "File:MotionOfPendulum.png", "Definition:Speed", "Definition:Simple Pend...
proofwiki-2912
One-Parameter Family of Curves for First Order ODE
Every one-parameter family of curves is the general solution of some first order ordinary differential equation. Conversely, every first order ordinary differential equation has as its general solution some one-parameter family of curves.
From Picard's Existence Theorem, every point in a given rectangle is passed through by some curve which is the solution of a given integral curve of a differential equation. The equation of this family can be written as: :$y = \map y {x, c}$ where different values of $c$ give different curves. The integral curve which ...
Every [[Definition:One-Parameter Family of Curves|one-parameter family of curves]] is the [[Definition:General Solution to Differential Equation|general solution]] of some [[Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation|first order ordinary differential equation]]. Conversely, every [[Definition:First Order Or...
From [[Picard's Existence Theorem]], every point in a given rectangle is passed through by some curve which is the solution of a given integral curve of a differential equation. The equation of this family can be written as: :$y = \map y {x, c}$ where different values of $c$ give different curves. The integral curve ...
One-Parameter Family of Curves for First Order ODE
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One-Parameter_Family_of_Curves_for_First_Order_ODE
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/One-Parameter_Family_of_Curves_for_First_Order_ODE
[ "First Order ODEs", "One-Parameter Families" ]
[ "Definition:Family of Curves/One-Parameter", "Definition:Differential Equation/Solution/General Solution", "Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation", "Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation", "Definition:Differential Equation/Solution/General Solution", "Definition:Family of C...
[ "Picard's Existence Theorem", "Definition:Family of Curves/One-Parameter", "Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation" ]
proofwiki-2913
Orthogonal Trajectories of One-Parameter Family of Curves
Every one-parameter family of curves has a unique family of orthogonal trajectories.
Let $\map f {x, y, z}$ define a one-parameter family of curves $\FF$. From One-Parameter Family of Curves for First Order ODE, there is a corresponding first order ODE: :$\map F {x, y, \dfrac {\d y} {\d x} }$ whose solution is $\FF$. From Slope of Orthogonal Curves, the slope of one curve is the negative reciprocal of ...
Every [[Definition:One-Parameter Family of Curves|one-parameter family of curves]] has a unique [[Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories|family of orthogonal trajectories]].
Let $\map f {x, y, z}$ define a [[Definition:One-Parameter Family of Curves|one-parameter family of curves]] $\FF$. From [[One-Parameter Family of Curves for First Order ODE]], there is a corresponding [[Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation|first order ODE]]: :$\map F {x, y, \dfrac {\d y} {\d x} }$ wh...
Orthogonal Trajectories of One-Parameter Family of Curves
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories_of_One-Parameter_Family_of_Curves
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories_of_One-Parameter_Family_of_Curves
[ "Orthogonal Trajectories", "One-Parameter Families" ]
[ "Definition:Family of Curves/One-Parameter", "Definition:Orthogonal Trajectories" ]
[ "Definition:Family of Curves/One-Parameter", "One-Parameter Family of Curves for First Order ODE", "Definition:First Order Ordinary Differential Equation", "Slope of Orthogonal Curves", "Definition:Slope", "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Reciprocal", "Definition:Orthogonal Curves", "Definition:...
proofwiki-2914
Brachistochrone is Cycloid
The shape of the brachistochrone is a cycloid.
:500px Recall from the Snell-Descartes Law: :$\dfrac {\sin \alpha_1} {v_1} = \dfrac {\sin \alpha_2} {v_2}$ Here, we invoke a generalization of the Snell-Descartes Law. This is justified, as we are attempting to demonstrate the curve that takes the smallest time. Thus we have $\dfrac {\sin \alpha} v = k$, where $k$ is s...
The [[Definition:Geometric Figure|shape]] of the [[Definition:Brachistochrone|brachistochrone]] is a [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]].
:[[File:Brachistochrone.png|500px]] Recall from the [[Snell-Descartes Law]]: :$\dfrac {\sin \alpha_1} {v_1} = \dfrac {\sin \alpha_2} {v_2}$ Here, we invoke a generalization of the [[Snell-Descartes Law]]. This is justified, as we are attempting to demonstrate the [[Definition:Curve|curve]] that takes the smallest [[...
Brachistochrone is Cycloid/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_is_Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_is_Cycloid/Proof_1
[ "Brachistochrone is Cycloid", "Cycloids" ]
[ "Definition:Geometric Figure", "Definition:Brachistochrone", "Definition:Cycloid" ]
[ "File:Brachistochrone.png", "Snell-Descartes Law", "Snell-Descartes Law", "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Time", "Definition:Constant", "Principle of Conservation of Energy", "Definition:Speed", "Definition:Potential Energy", "Definition:Point", "Principle of Conservation of Energy", "Def...
proofwiki-2915
Brachistochrone is Cycloid
The shape of the brachistochrone is a cycloid.
Throughout this proof, we use the standard alignment of coordinate axes: :$X$-axis pointing rightwards :$Y$-axis is pointing upwards. Suppose that the curve passes through the point $\tuple {x, y}$ for some value of variable $t$. Due to smoothness of the curve, one can define velocity $v$ at a point $\tuple {\map x t, ...
The [[Definition:Geometric Figure|shape]] of the [[Definition:Brachistochrone|brachistochrone]] is a [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]].
Throughout this [[Definition:Proof|proof]], we use the standard alignment of [[Definition:Coordinate Axis|coordinate axes]]: :[[Definition:X-Axis|$X$-axis]] pointing rightwards :[[Definition:Y-Axis|$Y$-axis]] is pointing upwards. Suppose that the [[Definition:Curve|curve]] passes through the [[Definition:Point|point]]...
Brachistochrone is Cycloid/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_is_Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_is_Cycloid/Proof_2
[ "Brachistochrone is Cycloid", "Cycloids" ]
[ "Definition:Geometric Figure", "Definition:Brachistochrone", "Definition:Cycloid" ]
[ "Definition:Proof", "Definition:Axis/Coordinate Axes", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Axis/Y-Axis", "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Variable/Real", "Definition:Smooth Real Function", "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Point", "Definition...
proofwiki-2916
Equation of Cycloid
Consider a circle of radius $a$ rolling without slipping along the x-axis of a cartesian plane. Consider the point $P$ on the circumference of this circle which is at the origin when its center is on the y-axis. Consider the cycloid traced out by the point $P$. Let $\tuple {x, y}$ be the coordinates of $P$ as it travel...
Let the circle have rolled so that the radius to the point $P = \tuple {x, y}$ is at angle $\theta$ to the vertical. :700px The center of the circle is at $\tuple {a \theta, a}$. From the diagram above, we see: :The $x$-coordinate is to the left of the center of the circle by $a \sin \theta$ :The $y$-coordinate is belo...
Consider a [[Definition:Circle|circle]] of [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] $a$ rolling without slipping along the [[Definition:X-Axis|x-axis]] of a [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|cartesian plane]]. Consider the [[Definition:Point|point]] $P$ on the [[Definition:Circumference of Circle|circumference]] of this [[De...
Let the circle have rolled so that the [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] to the point $P = \tuple {x, y}$ is at [[Definition:Angle|angle]] $\theta$ to [[Definition:Vertical|the vertical]]. :[[File:Cycloid.png|700px]] The [[Definition:Center of Circle|center]] of the [[Definition:Circle|circle]] is at $\tuple {...
Equation of Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Cycloid
[ "Cycloids" ]
[ "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Circle/Circumference", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Axis/Y-Axis", "Definition:Cycloid", ...
[ "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Angle", "Definition:Vertical", "File:Cycloid.png", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Diagram (Graphical Technique)", "Definition:Cartesian Coordinate System/X Coordinate", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Circle", "Definit...
proofwiki-2917
Length of Arc of Cycloid
Let $C$ be a cycloid generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the length of one arc of the cycloid is $8 a$.
Let $L$ be the length of one arc of the cycloid. From Arc Length for Parametric Equations: :$\ds L = \int_0^{2 \pi} \sqrt {\paren {\frac {\d x} {\d \theta} }^2 + \paren {\frac {\d y} {\d \theta} }^2} \rd \theta$ where, from Equation of Cycloid: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ we...
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the length of one [[Definition:Arc of Cycloid|arc]] of the [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] is $8 a$.
Let $L$ be the [[Definition:Arc Length|length]] of one [[Definition:Arc of Cycloid|arc]] of the [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]]. From [[Arc Length for Parametric Equations]]: :$\ds L = \int_0^{2 \pi} \sqrt {\paren {\frac {\d x} {\d \theta} }^2 + \paren {\frac {\d y} {\d \theta} }^2} \rd \theta$ where, from [[Equation...
Length of Arc of Cycloid/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Length_of_Arc_of_Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Length_of_Arc_of_Cycloid/Proof_1
[ "Arc Length", "Length of Arc of Cycloid", "Cycloids" ]
[ "Definition:Cycloid", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Cycloid" ]
[ "Definition:Arc Length", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Cycloid", "Arc Length for Parametric Equations", "Equation of Cycloid", "Derivative of Sine Function", "Derivative of Cosine Function", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denomina...
proofwiki-2918
Length of Arc of Cycloid
Let $C$ be a cycloid generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the length of one arc of the cycloid is $8 a$.
Consider the tangent line $PQ$ to the cycloid generated by a generating circle moving at '''constant''' angular speed of $\omega = \dfrac \theta t$. :750px From Angular Speed of Particle in Circular Motion at Constant Speed, point $P$ is moving at a speed of $\dfrac {\d s} {\d t} = r \omega = 2 a \map \sin {\dfrac \the...
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the length of one [[Definition:Arc of Cycloid|arc]] of the [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] is $8 a$.
Consider the [[Definition:Tangent Line|tangent line]] $PQ$ to the [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] generated by a [[Definition:Generating Circle of Cycloid|generating circle]] [[Definition:Motion|moving]] at '''[[Definition:Constant|constant]]''' [[Definition:Angular Speed|angular speed]] of $\omega = \dfrac \theta t$. ...
Length of Arc of Cycloid/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Length_of_Arc_of_Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Length_of_Arc_of_Cycloid/Proof_2
[ "Arc Length", "Length of Arc of Cycloid", "Cycloids" ]
[ "Definition:Cycloid", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Cycloid" ]
[ "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Cycloid", "Definition:Cycloid/Generating Circle", "Definition:Motion", "Definition:Constant", "Definition:Angular Speed", "File:ArcLengthOfCycloid2.png", "Angular Speed of Particle in Circular Motion at Constant Speed", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Motion"...
proofwiki-2919
Length of Arc of Cycloid
Let $C$ be a cycloid generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the length of one arc of the cycloid is $8 a$.
{{AuthorRef|René Descartes|Descartes}} approximated the cycloid by substituting a polygon for the generating circle. For example, a hexagon (where $n = 6$) produces $5$ arches (that is, $n - 1$). Each arch is generated by turning through the external angle of the polygon. For the hexagon, this is $\dfrac {2 \pi} ...
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the length of one [[Definition:Arc of Cycloid|arc]] of the [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] is $8 a$.
{{AuthorRef|René Descartes|Descartes}} approximated the [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] by substituting a [[Definition:Polygon|polygon]] for the [[Definition:Generating Circle of Cycloid|generating circle]]. For example, a [[Definition:Hexagon|hexagon]] (where $n = 6$) produces $5$ [[Definition:Arc of Cycloid|arches]...
Length of Arc of Cycloid/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Length_of_Arc_of_Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Length_of_Arc_of_Cycloid/Proof_3
[ "Arc Length", "Length of Arc of Cycloid", "Cycloids" ]
[ "Definition:Cycloid", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Cycloid" ]
[ "Definition:Cycloid", "Definition:Polygon", "Definition:Cycloid/Generating Circle", "Definition:Hexagon", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Polygon/External Angle", "Definition:Polygon", "Definition:Hexagon", "File:Cycloid of hexagon.png", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", ...
proofwiki-2920
Area under Arc of Cycloid
Let $C$ be a cycloid generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the area under one arc of the cycloid is $3 \pi a^2$. That is, the area under one arc of the cycloid is three times the area of the generating circle.
Let $A$ be the area under of one arc of the cycloid. From Area under Curve, $A$ is defined by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A | r = \int_0^{2 \pi a} y \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{2 \pi} a \paren {1 - \cos \theta} \frac {\d x} {\d \theta} \rd \theta | c = }} {{end-eqn}} But: :$\dfrac {\d x} {\d ...
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Cycloid|cycloid]] generated by the equations: :$x = a \paren {\theta - \sin \theta}$ :$y = a \paren {1 - \cos \theta}$ Then the [[Definition:Area|area]] under one [[Definition:Arc of Cycloid|arc of the cycloid]] is $3 \pi a^2$. That is, the [[Definition:Area|area]] under one [[Definition:A...
Let $A$ be the [[Definition:Area|area]] under of one [[Definition:Arc of Cycloid|arc of the cycloid]]. From [[Area under Curve]], $A$ is defined by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A | r = \int_0^{2 \pi a} y \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int_0^{2 \pi} a \paren {1 - \cos \theta} \frac {\d x} {\d \theta} \rd \the...
Area under Arc of Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_under_Arc_of_Cycloid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Area_under_Arc_of_Cycloid
[ "Cycloids" ]
[ "Definition:Cycloid", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Cycloid/Generating Circle" ]
[ "Definition:Area", "Definition:Cycloid/Arc", "Area under Curve" ]
proofwiki-2921
Goldbach Conjecture implies Weak Goldbach Conjecture
The Goldbach Conjecture: : Every even integer greater than $2$ is the sum of two primes implies Goldbach's Weak Conjecture: : Every odd integer greater than $7$ is the sum of three odd primes.
Take any odd integer $n$ such that $n > 7$. Then $m = n - 3$ is an even integer $n$ such that $m > 4$. If the Goldbach Conjecture holds, then $m$ is the sum of two primes: $m = p_1 + p_2$. If one of them were $2$, then $m - 2$ would have to be even, which if it is prime it can not be. So if $m > 4$, both $p_1$ and $p_2...
The [[Goldbach Conjecture]]: : Every [[Definition:Even Integer|even integer]] greater than $2$ is the sum of two [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]] implies [[Goldbach's Weak Conjecture]]: : Every [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]] greater than $7$ is the sum of three [[Definition:Odd Prime|odd primes]].
Take any [[Definition:Odd Integer|odd integer]] $n$ such that $n > 7$. Then $m = n - 3$ is an [[Definition:Even Integer|even integer]] $n$ such that $m > 4$. If the [[Goldbach Conjecture]] holds, then $m$ is the sum of two [[Definition:Prime Number|primes]]: $m = p_1 + p_2$. If one of them were $2$, then $m - 2$ wo...
Goldbach Conjecture implies Weak Goldbach Conjecture
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Goldbach_Conjecture_implies_Weak_Goldbach_Conjecture
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Goldbach_Conjecture_implies_Weak_Goldbach_Conjecture
[ "Number Theory", "Goldbach Conjecture" ]
[ "Goldbach Conjecture", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Prime Number", "Goldbach's Weak Conjecture", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Odd Prime" ]
[ "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Even Integer", "Goldbach Conjecture", "Definition:Prime Number", "Definition:Even Integer", "Goldbach Conjecture", "Goldbach's Weak Conjecture", "Category:Number Theory", "Category:Goldbach Conjecture" ]
proofwiki-2922
Euclidean Domain is UFD
Let $\struct {D, +, \times}$ be a Euclidean domain. Then $\struct {D, +, \times}$ is a unique factorization domain.
By the definition of unique factorization domain, we need to show that: For all $x \in D$ such that $x$ is non-zero and not a unit of $D$: :$(1): \quad x$ has a complete factorization in $D$ :$(2): \quad$ Any two complete factorizations of $x$ in $D$ are equivalent.
Let $\struct {D, +, \times}$ be a [[Definition:Euclidean Domain|Euclidean domain]]. Then $\struct {D, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Unique Factorization Domain|unique factorization domain]].
By the definition of [[Definition:Unique Factorization Domain|unique factorization domain]], we need to show that: For all $x \in D$ such that $x$ is non-[[Definition:Ring Zero|zero]] and not a [[Definition:Unit of Ring|unit]] of $D$: :$(1): \quad x$ has a [[Definition:Complete Factorization|complete factorization]]...
Euclidean Domain is UFD
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclidean_Domain_is_UFD
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclidean_Domain_is_UFD
[ "Euclidean Domains", "Unique Factorization Domains", "Factorization" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Domain", "Definition:Unique Factorization Domain" ]
[ "Definition:Unique Factorization Domain", "Definition:Ring Zero", "Definition:Unit of Ring", "Definition:Complete Factorization", "Definition:Complete Factorization", "Definition:Equivalent Factorizations", "Definition:Unit of Ring", "Definition:Complete Factorization", "Definition:Unit of Ring", ...
proofwiki-2923
Quadrature of Parabola
Let $T$ be a parabola. Consider the parabolic segment bounded by an arbitrary chord $AB$. Let $C$ be the point on $T$ where the tangent to $T$ is parallel to $AB$. Then the area $S$ of the parabolic segment $ABC$ of $T$ is given by: :$S = \dfrac 4 3 \triangle ABC$
{{WLOG}}, consider the parabola $y = a x^2$. Let $A, B, C$ be the points: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A | r = \tuple {x_0, a {x_0}^2} }} {{eqn | l = B | r = \tuple {x_2, a {x_2}^2} }} {{eqn | l = C | r = \tuple {x_1, a {x_1}^2} }} {{end-eqn}} :500px The slope of the tangent at $C$ is given by using: :$\...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Parabola|parabola]]. Consider the [[Definition:Parabolic Segment|parabolic segment]] bounded by an arbitrary [[Definition:Chord of Parabola|chord]] $AB$. Let $C$ be the point on $T$ where the [[Definition:Tangent Line|tangent]] to $T$ is [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] to $AB$. Then ...
{{WLOG}}, consider the [[Definition:Parabola|parabola]] $y = a x^2$. Let $A, B, C$ be the points: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = A | r = \tuple {x_0, a {x_0}^2} }} {{eqn | l = B | r = \tuple {x_2, a {x_2}^2} }} {{eqn | l = C | r = \tuple {x_1, a {x_1}^2} }} {{end-eqn}} :[[File:ParabolaQuadrature2.png|5...
Quadrature of Parabola/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrature_of_Parabola
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrature_of_Parabola/Proof_1
[ "Quadrature of Parabola", "Parabolas", "Area Formulas" ]
[ "Definition:Parabola", "Definition:Parabolic Segment", "Definition:Chord of Conic Section/Parabola", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Parabolic Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Parabola", "File:ParabolaQuadrature2.png", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Vertical", "Definition:Line/Straight Line", "Definition:Bisection", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Parallelogram", "Definition:Point", "Definition:...
proofwiki-2924
Quadrature of Parabola
Let $T$ be a parabola. Consider the parabolic segment bounded by an arbitrary chord $AB$. Let $C$ be the point on $T$ where the tangent to $T$ is parallel to $AB$. Then the area $S$ of the parabolic segment $ABC$ of $T$ is given by: :$S = \dfrac 4 3 \triangle ABC$
Let $T$ be the parabola which is the locus of points $\tuple {x, y}$ satisfying $y = x^2$. By Area of Triangle Inscribed in Parabola: :the point $C$ where the tangent to $T$ at $C$ is parallel to $AB$ has $x$-coordinate $\dfrac 1 2 \paren {x_0 + x_2}$. Let $d$ be the horizontal distance between $A$ and $B$. By Area of ...
Let $T$ be a [[Definition:Parabola|parabola]]. Consider the [[Definition:Parabolic Segment|parabolic segment]] bounded by an arbitrary [[Definition:Chord of Parabola|chord]] $AB$. Let $C$ be the point on $T$ where the [[Definition:Tangent Line|tangent]] to $T$ is [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]] to $AB$. Then ...
Let $T$ be the [[Definition:Parabola|parabola]] which is the [[Definition:Locus|locus]] of [[Definition:Point|points]] $\tuple {x, y}$ satisfying $y = x^2$. By [[Area of Triangle Inscribed in Parabola]]: :the point $C$ where the [[Definition:Tangent Line|tangent]] to $T$ at $C$ is [[Definition:Parallel Lines|parallel]...
Quadrature of Parabola/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrature_of_Parabola
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quadrature_of_Parabola/Proof_2
[ "Quadrature of Parabola", "Parabolas", "Area Formulas" ]
[ "Definition:Parabola", "Definition:Parabolic Segment", "Definition:Chord of Conic Section/Parabola", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Parabolic Segment" ]
[ "Definition:Parabola", "Definition:Locus", "Definition:Point", "Area of Triangle Inscribed in Parabola", "Definition:Tangent Line", "Definition:Parallel (Geometry)/Lines", "Definition:Cartesian Coordinate System", "Definition:Distance between Points", "Area of Triangle Inscribed in Parabola", "Def...
proofwiki-2925
Lune of Hippocrates
Take the circle whose center is $A$ and whose radius is $AB = AC = AD = AE$. Let $C$ be the center of a circle whose radius is $CD = CF = CE$. :400px Consider the lune $DFEB$. Its area is equal to that of the square $AEGC$.
:400px The chords $DB$ and $EB$ are tangent to the arc $DFE$. They divide the lune into three regions: yellow, green and blue. From Pythagoras's Theorem, $CD = \sqrt 2 AD$. The green and blue areas are of equal area as each subtend a right angle. The orange area also subtends a right angle. So the area of the orange ar...
Take the [[Definition:Circle|circle]] whose [[Definition:Center of Circle|center]] is $A$ and whose [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] is $AB = AC = AD = AE$. Let $C$ be the [[Definition:Center of Circle|center]] of a circle whose [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] is $CD = CF = CE$. :[[File:LuneOfHippocrates...
:[[File:LuneOfHippocratesProof.png|400px]] The [[Definition:Chord of Circle|chords]] $DB$ and $EB$ are [[Definition:Tangent to Circle|tangent]] to the [[Definition:Arc of Circle|arc]] $DFE$. They divide the [[Definition:Lune (Plane Geometry)|lune]] into three regions: yellow, green and blue. From [[Pythagoras's Theor...
Lune of Hippocrates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lune_of_Hippocrates
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Lune_of_Hippocrates
[ "Lunes (Plane Geometry)", "Plane Geometry" ]
[ "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "File:LuneOfHippocrates.png", "Definition:Lune (Plane Geometry)", "Definition:Area", "Definition:Quadrilateral/Square" ]
[ "File:LuneOfHippocratesProof.png", "Definition:Circle/Chord", "Definition:Tangent Line/Circle", "Definition:Circle/Arc", "Definition:Lune (Plane Geometry)", "Pythagoras's Theorem", "Definition:Subtend", "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:Subtend", "Definition:Right Angle", "Definition:Lune (P...
proofwiki-2926
Integral of Power
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
From the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: :$(1): \quad \ds \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \bigintlimits {\map F x} 0 b = \map F b - \map F 0$ where $\map F x$ is a primitive of $x^n$. By Primitive of Power, $\dfrac {x^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$ is a primitive of $x^n$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int_0^b x^n \rd x | r = \intl...
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
From the [[Fundamental Theorem of Calculus]]: :$(1): \quad \ds \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \bigintlimits {\map F x} 0 b = \map F b - \map F 0$ where $\map F x$ is a [[Definition:Primitive (Calculus)|primitive]] of $x^n$. By [[Primitive of Power]], $\dfrac {x^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$ is a [[Definition:Primitive (Calculus)|primiti...
Integral of Power/Conventional Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power/Conventional_Proof
[ "Integral Calculus" ]
[]
[ "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", "Definition:Primitive (Calculus)", "Primitive of Power", "Definition:Primitive (Calculus)" ]
proofwiki-2927
Integral of Power
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
First let $n$ be a positive integer. Take a real number $r \in \R$ such that $0 < r < 1$ but reasonably close to $1$. Consider a subdivision $S$ of the closed interval $\closedint 0 b$ defined as: :$S = \set {0, \ldots, r^2 b, r b, b}$ that is, by taking as the points of subdivision successive powers of $r$. Now we tak...
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
First let $n$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Take a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] $r \in \R$ such that $0 < r < 1$ but reasonably close to $1$. Consider a [[Definition:Subdivision of Interval|subdivision]] $S$ of the [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] $\closedint 0 b$...
Integral of Power/Fermat's Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power/Fermat's_Proof
[ "Integral Calculus" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Upper Darboux Sum", "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Strictly Positive", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Ra...
proofwiki-2928
Integral of Power
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
Let $n \ge 2$. Let: :$\ds I_n := \int \sin^n x \rd x$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = I_n | r = \int \sin^n x \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int \sin^{n - 1} x \sin x \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int \sin^{n - 1} x \map \rd {-\cos x} | c = Derivative of Cosine Function }} {{eqn | r = - \sin^{n - 1...
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
Let $n \ge 2$. Let: :$\ds I_n := \int \sin^n x \rd x$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = I_n | r = \int \sin^n x \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int \sin^{n - 1} x \sin x \rd x | c = }} {{eqn | r = \int \sin^{n - 1} x \map \rd {-\cos x} | c = [[Derivative of Cosine Function]] }} {{eqn | r = - \sin...
Reduction Formula for Integral of Power of Sine/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reduction_Formula_for_Integral_of_Power_of_Sine/Proof_1
[ "Integral Calculus" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Cosine Function", "Integration by Parts", "Power Rule for Derivatives", "Derivative of Composite Function", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Indefinite", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Primitive of Sine Function" ]
proofwiki-2929
Integral of Power
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
With a view to expressing the problem in the form: :$\ds \int u \frac {\d v} {\d x} \rd x = u v - \int v \frac {\d u} {\d x} \rd x$ let: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = u | r = \sin^{n - 1} x | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d u} {\d x} | r = \paren {n - 1} \sin ^{n - 2} x \cos x | c...
:$\ds \forall n \in \R_{\ne -1}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
With a view to expressing the problem in the form: :$\ds \int u \frac {\d v} {\d x} \rd x = u v - \int v \frac {\d u} {\d x} \rd x$ let: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = u | r = \sin^{n - 1} x | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d u} {\d x} | r = \paren {n - 1} \sin ^{n - 2} x \cos x | ...
Reduction Formula for Integral of Power of Sine/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Reduction_Formula_for_Integral_of_Power_of_Sine/Proof_2
[ "Integral Calculus" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Sine Function", "Power Rule for Derivatives", "Primitive of Sine Function", "Integration by Parts", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Linear Combination of Integrals/Indefinite" ]
proofwiki-2930
Volume of Sphere
The volume $V$ of a sphere of radius $r$ is given by: :$V = \dfrac {4 \pi r^3} 3$
Consider the circle in the cartesian plane whose center is at $\tuple {a, 0}$ and whose radius is $a$. From Equation of Circle, its equation is: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = 2 a x$ Consider this circle as the cross-section through the center of a sphere which has the x-axis passing through its center, which is at $\tuple {...
The [[Definition:Volume|volume]] $V$ of a [[Definition:Sphere (Geometry)|sphere]] of [[Definition:Radius of Sphere|radius]] $r$ is given by: :$V = \dfrac {4 \pi r^3} 3$
Consider the [[Definition:Circle|circle]] in the [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|cartesian plane]] whose [[Definition:Center of Circle|center]] is at $\tuple {a, 0}$ and whose [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] is $a$. From [[Equation of Circle]], its equation is: :$(1): \quad x^2 + y^2 = 2 a x$ Consider this circle...
Volume of Sphere/Proof by Archimedes
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Sphere
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Sphere/Proof_by_Archimedes
[ "Volume of Sphere", "Spheres", "Volume Formulas" ]
[ "Definition:Volume", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry/Radius" ]
[ "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Equation of Circle", "Definition:Cross-Section", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry", "Definition:Axis/X-Axis", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry/Center", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry", "Definition:Cone...
proofwiki-2931
Volume of Sphere
The volume $V$ of a sphere of radius $r$ is given by: :$V = \dfrac {4 \pi r^3} 3$
:600px Consider a sphere $S$ of radius $r$. Consider a right circular cylinder $C$ whose bases are circles of radius $r$ and whose height is $2 r$. Let $K$ be a double napped cone each of whose nappes has bases which coincide with the bases of $C$. Let $K$ be removed from $C$ to leave a solid figure $C'$ described as a...
The [[Definition:Volume|volume]] $V$ of a [[Definition:Sphere (Geometry)|sphere]] of [[Definition:Radius of Sphere|radius]] $r$ is given by: :$V = \dfrac {4 \pi r^3} 3$
:[[File:VolumeOfSphereCavalieri.png|600px]] Consider a [[Definition:Sphere (Geometry)|sphere]] $S$ of [[Definition:Radius of Sphere|radius]] $r$. Consider a [[Definition:Right Circular Cylinder|right circular cylinder]] $C$ whose [[Definition:Base of Right Circular Cylinder|bases]] are [[Definition:Circle|circles]] o...
Volume of Sphere/Proof by Cavalieri
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Sphere
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Sphere/Proof_by_Cavalieri
[ "Volume of Sphere", "Spheres", "Volume Formulas" ]
[ "Definition:Volume", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry/Radius" ]
[ "File:VolumeOfSphereCavalieri.png", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry/Radius", "Definition:Right Circular Cylinder", "Definition:Right Circular Cylinder/Base", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Cylinder/Height", "Definition:Cone (Geometry)/Double Na...
proofwiki-2932
Volume of Sphere
The volume $V$ of a sphere of radius $r$ is given by: :$V = \dfrac {4 \pi r^3} 3$
=== Construction === Describe a circle on the $x y$-plane. Let its center be the origin. By Equation of Circle, this circle is the locus of: :$x^2 + y^2 = r^2$ where $r$ is a constant radius. Solving for $y$: :$y = \pm \sqrt {r^2 - x^2}$ Considering only the upper half of the circle: :$y = \sqrt {r^2 - x^2}$ :300px Thi...
The [[Definition:Volume|volume]] $V$ of a [[Definition:Sphere (Geometry)|sphere]] of [[Definition:Radius of Sphere|radius]] $r$ is given by: :$V = \dfrac {4 \pi r^3} 3$
=== Construction === Describe a [[Definition:Circle|circle]] on the [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|$x y$-plane]]. Let its [[Definition:Center of Circle|center]] be the [[Definition:Origin|origin]]. By [[Equation of Circle]], this circle is the [[Definition:Locus|locus]] of: :$x^2 + y^2 = r^2$ where $r$ is a constant [...
Volume of Sphere/Proof by Method of Disks
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Sphere
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Sphere/Proof_by_Method_of_Disks
[ "Volume of Sphere", "Spheres", "Volume Formulas" ]
[ "Definition:Volume", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry", "Definition:Sphere/Geometry/Radius" ]
[ "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Equation of Circle", "Definition:Locus", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "File:Semicircle.png", "Definition:Geometric Figure/Plane Figure", "Definition:Circle/Semicircle", "Definiti...
proofwiki-2933
Einstein's Mass-Energy Equation
The energy imparted to a body to cause that body to move causes the body to increase in mass by a value $M$ as given by the equation: :$E = M c^2$ where $c$ is the speed of light.
From Einstein's Law of Motion, we have: :$\mathbf F = \dfrac {m_0 \mathbf a} {\paren {1 - \dfrac {v^2} {c^2} }^{\tfrac 3 2} }$ where: :$\mathbf F$ is the force on the body :$\mathbf a$ is the acceleration induced on the body :$v$ is the magnitude of the velocity of the body :$c$ is the speed of light :$m_0$ is the rest...
The [[Definition:Energy|energy]] imparted to a [[Definition:Body|body]] to cause that [[Definition:Body|body]] to move causes the [[Definition:Body|body]] to increase in [[Definition:Mass|mass]] by a value $M$ as given by the equation: :$E = M c^2$ where $c$ is the [[Definition:Speed of Light|speed of light]].
From [[Einstein's Law of Motion]], we have: :$\mathbf F = \dfrac {m_0 \mathbf a} {\paren {1 - \dfrac {v^2} {c^2} }^{\tfrac 3 2} }$ where: :$\mathbf F$ is the [[Definition:Force|force]] on the [[Definition:Body|body]] :$\mathbf a$ is the [[Definition:Acceleration|acceleration]] induced on the [[Definition:Body|body]] ...
Einstein's Mass-Energy Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Einstein's_Mass-Energy_Equation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Einstein's_Mass-Energy_Equation
[ "Einstein's Mass-Energy Equation", "Mass", "Energy", "Relativistic Mechanics", "Physics" ]
[ "Definition:Energy", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Speed of Light" ]
[ "Einstein's Law of Motion", "Definition:Force", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Acceleration", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Magnitude", "Definition:Velocity", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Speed of Light", "Definition:Rest Mass", "Definition:Body", "Definition:Stationary", "Definition:Coor...
proofwiki-2934
Dimension of Universal Gravitational Constant
The dimension of the universal gravitational constant $G$ is $M^{-1} L^3 T^{-2}$.
From Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation: :$\mathbf F = \dfrac {G m_1 m_2 \mathbf r} {r^3}$ We have that: : The dimension of force is $M L T^{-2}$ : The dimension of displacement is $L$ : The dimension of mass is $M$. Let $x$ be the dimension of $G$. Then we have: :$M L T^{-2} = x \dfrac {M^2 L}{L^3}$ Hence, after al...
The [[Definition:Dimension of Measurement|dimension]] of the [[Definition:Universal Gravitational Constant|universal gravitational constant]] $G$ is $M^{-1} L^3 T^{-2}$.
From [[Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation]]: :$\mathbf F = \dfrac {G m_1 m_2 \mathbf r} {r^3}$ We have that: : The [[Definition:Dimension of Measurement|dimension]] of [[Definition:Force|force]] is $M L T^{-2}$ : The [[Definition:Dimension of Measurement|dimension]] of [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]] is $L...
Dimension of Universal Gravitational Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dimension_of_Universal_Gravitational_Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dimension_of_Universal_Gravitational_Constant
[ "Universal Gravitational Constant", "Dimensional Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Definition:Universal Gravitational Constant" ]
[ "Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation", "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Definition:Force", "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Definition:Mass", "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Category:Universal Gravitational Constan...
proofwiki-2935
Dimension of Spring Force Constant
The dimension of a spring force constant is $\mathsf {M T}^{-2}$.
From Hooke's Law, we have: :$\mathbf F = -k \mathbf x$ where: :$\mathbf F$ is a force, of dimension $\mathsf {M L T}^{-2}$ :$k$ is the spring force constant :$\mathbf x$ is a displacement, of dimension $\mathsf L$. Let the dimension of $k$ be $D$. Then we have: :$\mathsf {M L T}^{-2} = D \mathsf L$ from which the resul...
The [[Definition:Dimension of Measurement|dimension]] of a [[Definition:Spring Force Constant|spring force constant]] is $\mathsf {M T}^{-2}$.
From [[Hooke's Law]], we have: :$\mathbf F = -k \mathbf x$ where: :$\mathbf F$ is a [[Definition:Force|force]], of [[Definition:Dimension of Measurement|dimension]] $\mathsf {M L T}^{-2}$ :$k$ is the [[Definition:Spring Force Constant|spring force constant]] :$\mathbf x$ is a [[Definition:Displacement|displacement]], ...
Dimension of Spring Force Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dimension_of_Spring_Force_Constant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Dimension_of_Spring_Force_Constant
[ "Dimensional Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Definition:Spring/Force Constant" ]
[ "Hooke's Law", "Definition:Force", "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Definition:Spring/Force Constant", "Definition:Displacement", "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Definition:Dimension (Measurement)", "Category:Dimensional Analysis" ]
proofwiki-2936
Vieta's Formula for Pi
:$\pi = 2 \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt 2} \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt {2 + \sqrt 2} } \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt {2 + \sqrt {2 + \sqrt 2} } } \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt {2 + \sqrt {2 + \sqrt {2 + \sqrt 2 } } } } \times \cdots$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \sin \frac \pi 2 | c = Sine of Half-Integer Multiple of Pi }} {{eqn | r = 2 \sin \frac \pi 4 \cos \frac \pi 4 | c = Double Angle Formula for Sine }} {{eqn | r = 2 \paren {2 \sin \frac \pi 8 \cos \frac \pi 8} \cos \frac \pi 4 | c = Double Angle Formula for Sine }...
:$\pi = 2 \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt 2} \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt {2 + \sqrt 2} } \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt {2 + \sqrt {2 + \sqrt 2} } } \times \dfrac 2 {\sqrt {2 + \sqrt {2 + \sqrt {2 + \sqrt 2 } } } } \times \cdots$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 1 | r = \sin \frac \pi 2 | c = [[Sine of Half-Integer Multiple of Pi]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 \sin \frac \pi 4 \cos \frac \pi 4 | c = [[Double Angle Formula for Sine]] }} {{eqn | r = 2 \paren {2 \sin \frac \pi 8 \cos \frac \pi 8} \cos \frac \pi 4 | c = [[Double Angle Formula ...
Vieta's Formula for Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vieta's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vieta's_Formula_for_Pi
[ "Vieta's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi", "Examples of Infinite Products" ]
[]
[ "Sine of Half-Integer Multiple of Pi", "Double Angle Formulas/Sine", "Double Angle Formulas/Sine", "Double Angle Formulas/Sine", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Half Angle Formulas/Cosine", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "De...
proofwiki-2937
Leibniz's Formula for Pi
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
First we note that: :$(1): \quad \dfrac 1 {1 + t^2} = 1 - t^2 + t^4 - t^6 + \cdots + t^{4 n} - \dfrac {t^{4 n + 2} } {1 + t^2}$ which is demonstrated here. Now consider the real number $x \in \R: 0 \le x \le 1$. We can integrate expression $(1)$ {{WRT|Integration}} $t$ from $0$ to $x$: :$(2): \quad \ds \int_0^x \frac {...
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
First we note that: :$(1): \quad \dfrac 1 {1 + t^2} = 1 - t^2 + t^4 - t^6 + \cdots + t^{4 n} - \dfrac {t^{4 n + 2} } {1 + t^2}$ which is demonstrated [[Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Lemma|here]]. Now consider the [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] $x \in \R: 0 \le x \le 1$. We can [[Definition:Integration|integrate...
Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Elementary Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi/Elementary_Proof
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi" ]
[]
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Lemma", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Primitive (Calculus)/Integration", "Square of Real Number is Non-Negative", "Relative Sizes of Definite Integrals", "Definition:Basic Null Sequence", "Squeeze Theorem", "Derivative of Arctangent Function", "Fundamental Theorem o...
proofwiki-2938
Leibniz's Formula for Pi
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
:500px The area $OAT$ is a quarter-circle whose area is $\dfrac \pi 4$ by Area of Circle. Now consider the area $C$ of the segment $OPQT$, bounded by the arc $OT$ and the chord $OT$. Consider the area $OPQ$, bounded by the line segments $OP$ and $OQ$ and the arc $PQ$. As $P$ and $Q$ approach each other, the arc $PQ$ te...
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
:[[File:LeibnizFormula.png|500px]] The area $OAT$ is a quarter-[[Definition:Circle|circle]] whose area is $\dfrac \pi 4$ by [[Area of Circle]]. Now consider the area $C$ of the [[Definition:Segment of Circle|segment]] $OPQT$, bounded by the [[Definition:Arc of Circle|arc]] $OT$ and the [[Definition:Chord of Circle|ch...
Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Leibniz's Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi/Leibniz's_Proof
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi" ]
[]
[ "File:LeibnizFormula.png", "Definition:Circle", "Area of Circle", "Definition:Segment of Circle", "Definition:Circle/Arc", "Definition:Circle/Chord", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Circle/Arc", "Definition:Circle/Arc", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Triangle (Geometry)", "Defin...
proofwiki-2939
Leibniz's Formula for Pi
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 b \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\infty \dfrac {\paren {-1}^{k + 1} } {a + b k} | r = \map \psi {\dfrac a {2 b} + 1} - \map \psi {\dfrac a {2 b} + \dfrac 1 2} | c = {{Corollary|Reciprocal times Derivative of Gamma Function|2}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -4 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\in...
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 b \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\infty \dfrac {\paren {-1}^{k + 1} } {a + b k} | r = \map \psi {\dfrac a {2 b} + 1} - \map \psi {\dfrac a {2 b} + \dfrac 1 2} | c = {{Corollary|Reciprocal times Derivative of Gamma Function|2}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = -4 \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\in...
Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Proof by Digamma Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi/Proof_by_Digamma_Function
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi" ]
[]
[ "Digamma Function of Three Fourths", "Digamma Function/Examples/Digamma Function of Five Fourths" ]
proofwiki-2940
Leibniz's Formula for Pi
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
{{Recall|Dirichlet Beta Function}} {{:Definition:Dirichlet Beta Function}} From Dirichlet Beta Function at Odd Positive Integers, we obtain: :$\map \beta {2 n + 1} = \paren {-1}^n \dfrac {E_{2 n} \pi^{2 n + 1} } {4^{n + 1} \paren {2 n}!}$ Therefore, setting $n = 0$ above: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta 1 | ...
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
{{Recall|Dirichlet Beta Function}} {{:Definition:Dirichlet Beta Function}} From [[Dirichlet Beta Function at Odd Positive Integers]], we obtain: :$\map \beta {2 n + 1} = \paren {-1}^n \dfrac {E_{2 n} \pi^{2 n + 1} } {4^{n + 1} \paren {2 n}!}$ Therefore, setting $n = 0$ above: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \beta 1 ...
Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Proof by Dirichlet Beta Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi/Proof_by_Dirichlet_Beta_Function
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi" ]
[]
[ "Dirichlet Beta Function at Odd Positive Integers", "Dirichlet Beta Function at Odd Positive Integers", "Factorial/Examples/0" ]
proofwiki-2941
Leibniz's Formula for Pi
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
From {{Corollary|Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cotangent Function|1}}, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \pi {2 n} \map \cot {\frac {\pi m} {2 n} } | r = \frac 1 m + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {\frac 1 {2 k n + m} - \frac 1 {2 k n - m} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 m + \paren {\frac 1 {2 n +...
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
From {{Corollary|Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cotangent Function|1}}, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \pi {2 n} \map \cot {\frac {\pi m} {2 n} } | r = \frac 1 m + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^\infty \paren {\frac 1 {2 k n + m} - \frac 1 {2 k n - m} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 m + \paren {\frac 1 {2 n ...
Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Proof by Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Cotangent Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi/Proof_by_Mittag-Leffler_Expansion_for_Cotangent_Function
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-2942
Leibniz's Formula for Pi
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
From {{Corollary|Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Tangent Function}}, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \pi {2 n} \map \tan {\frac {\pi m} {2 n} } | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {\frac 1 {\paren {2 k + 1} n - m} - \frac 1 {\paren {2 k + 1} n + m} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\frac 1 {n - m} ...
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
From {{Corollary|Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Tangent Function}}, we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \pi {2 n} \map \tan {\frac {\pi m} {2 n} } | r = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^\infty \paren {\frac 1 {\paren {2 k + 1} n - m} - \frac 1 {\paren {2 k + 1} n + m} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\frac 1 {n - m}...
Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Proof by Mittag-Leffler Expansion for Tangent Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi/Proof_by_Mittag-Leffler_Expansion_for_Tangent_Function
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-2943
Leibniz's Formula for Pi
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
From Power Series Expansion for Real Arctangent Function, we obtain: :$\arctan x = x - \dfrac {x^3} 3 + \dfrac {x^5} 5 - \dfrac {x^7} 7 + \dfrac {x^9} 9 - \cdots$ Substituting $x = 1$ gives the required result. {{qed}}
:$\dfrac \pi 4 = 1 - \dfrac 1 3 + \dfrac 1 5 - \dfrac 1 7 + \dfrac 1 9 - \cdots \approx 0 \cdotp 78539 \, 81633 \, 9744 \ldots$
From [[Power Series Expansion for Real Arctangent Function]], we obtain: :$\arctan x = x - \dfrac {x^3} 3 + \dfrac {x^5} 5 - \dfrac {x^7} 7 + \dfrac {x^9} 9 - \cdots$ Substituting $x = 1$ gives the required result. {{qed}}
Leibniz's Formula for Pi/Proof by Taylor Expansion
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Formula_for_Pi/Proof_by_Taylor_Expansion
[ "Leibniz's Formula for Pi", "Formulas for Pi" ]
[]
[ "Power Series Expansion for Real Arctangent Function" ]
proofwiki-2944
Derivative of Arc Length
Let $C$ be a curve in the cartesian plane described by the equation $y = \map f x$. Let $s$ be the length along the arc of the curve from some reference point $P$. Then the derivative of $s$ with respect to $x$ is given by: :$\dfrac {\d s} {\d x} = \sqrt {1 + \paren {\dfrac {\d y} {\d x} }^2}$
Consider a length $\d s$ of $C$, short enough for it to be approximated to a straight line segment: :250px By Pythagoras's Theorem, we have: :$\d s^2 = \d x^2 + \d y^2$ Dividing by $\d x^2$ we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {\frac {\d s} {\d x} }^2 | r = \paren {\frac {\d x} {\d x} }^2 + \paren {\frac {\d...
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Curve|curve]] in the [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|cartesian plane]] described by the equation $y = \map f x$. Let $s$ be the [[Definition:Linear Measure|length]] along the [[Definition:Arc of Curve|arc]] of the curve from some reference point $P$. Then the [[Definition:Derivative|derivative]...
Consider a length $\d s$ of $C$, short enough for it to be approximated to a [[Definition:Line Segment|straight line segment]]: :[[File:DSbyDX.png|250px]] By [[Pythagoras's Theorem]], we have: :$\d s^2 = \d x^2 + \d y^2$ Dividing by $\d x^2$ we have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {\frac {\d s} {\d x} }^2 ...
Derivative of Arc Length/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Arc_Length
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Arc_Length/Proof_1
[ "Analytic Geometry", "Differential Calculus", "Integral Calculus", "Derivative of Arc Length" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Linear Measure", "Definition:Curve/Arc", "Definition:Derivative" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Segment", "File:DSbyDX.png", "Pythagoras's Theorem", "Definition:Square Root/Complex Number/Principal Square Root" ]
proofwiki-2945
Derivative of Arc Length
Let $C$ be a curve in the cartesian plane described by the equation $y = \map f x$. Let $s$ be the length along the arc of the curve from some reference point $P$. Then the derivative of $s$ with respect to $x$ is given by: :$\dfrac {\d s} {\d x} = \sqrt {1 + \paren {\dfrac {\d y} {\d x} }^2}$
From Continuously Differentiable Curve has Finite Arc Length, $s$ exists and is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s | r = \int_P^x \sqrt {1 + \paren {\frac {\d y} {\d u} }^2} \rd u }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d s} {\d x} | r = \frac {\d} {\d x} \int_P^x \sqrt {1 + \paren {\frac {\d y} {\d ...
Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Curve|curve]] in the [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|cartesian plane]] described by the equation $y = \map f x$. Let $s$ be the [[Definition:Linear Measure|length]] along the [[Definition:Arc of Curve|arc]] of the curve from some reference point $P$. Then the [[Definition:Derivative|derivative]...
From [[Continuously Differentiable Curve has Finite Arc Length]], $s$ exists and is given by: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = s | r = \int_P^x \sqrt {1 + \paren {\frac {\d y} {\d u} }^2} \rd u }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d s} {\d x} | r = \frac {\d} {\d x} \int_P^x \sqrt {1 + \paren {\frac {\d y}...
Derivative of Arc Length/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Arc_Length
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Arc_Length/Proof_2
[ "Analytic Geometry", "Differential Calculus", "Integral Calculus", "Derivative of Arc Length" ]
[ "Definition:Line/Curve", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Linear Measure", "Definition:Curve/Arc", "Definition:Derivative" ]
[ "Continuously Differentiable Curve has Finite Arc Length", "Definition:Differentiation", "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus/First Part" ]
proofwiki-2946
Duality Principle for Sets
Any identity in set theory which uses any or all of the operations: :Set intersection $\cap$ :Set union $\cup$ :Empty set $\O$ :Universal set $\mathbb U$ and none other, remains valid if: :$\cap$ and $\cup$ are exchanged throughout :$\O$ and $\mathbb U$ are exchanged throughout.
Follows from: * Algebra of Sets is Huntington Algebra * Principle of Duality of Huntington Algebras {{qed}}
Any identity in [[Definition:Set Theory|set theory]] which uses any or all of the operations: :[[Definition:Set Intersection|Set intersection]] $\cap$ :[[Definition:Set Union|Set union]] $\cup$ :[[Definition:Empty Set|Empty set]] $\O$ :[[Definition:Universal Set|Universal set]] $\mathbb U$ and none other, remains valid...
Follows from: * [[Algebra of Sets is Huntington Algebra]] * [[Principle of Duality of Huntington Algebras]] {{qed}}
Duality Principle for Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Duality_Principle_for_Sets
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Duality_Principle_for_Sets
[ "Named Theorems", "Set Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set Theory", "Definition:Set Intersection", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Universal Set" ]
[ "Algebra of Sets is Huntington Algebra", "Principle of Duality of Huntington Algebras" ]
proofwiki-2947
Rational Addition is Commutative
The operation of addition on the set of rational numbers $\Q$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \Q: x + y = y + x$
Follows directly from the definition of rational numbers as the field of quotients of the integral domain $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of integers. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a field, and therefore a fortiori $+$ is commutative on $\Q$. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Rational Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \Q: x + y = y + x$
Follows directly from the [[Definition:Rational Number|definition of rational numbers]] as the [[Definition:Field of Quotients|field of quotients]] of the [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Field (A...
Rational Addition is Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Addition_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Addition_is_Commutative
[ "Rational Addition", "Examples of Commutative Operations", "Commutative Law of Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Rational Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Field of Quotients", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:A Fortiori", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
proofwiki-2948
Rational Addition is Associative
The operation of addition on the set of rational numbers $\Q$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Q: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Follows directly from the definition of rational numbers as the field of quotients of the integral domain $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of integers. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a field, and therefore a fortiori $+$ is associative on $\Q$. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Rational Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Q: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Follows directly from the [[Definition:Rational Number|definition of rational numbers]] as the [[Definition:Field of Quotients|field of quotients]] of the [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Field (A...
Rational Addition is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Addition_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Addition_is_Associative
[ "Rational Addition", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Associative Law of Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Rational Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Field of Quotients", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:A Fortiori", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
proofwiki-2949
Subtraction on Numbers is Anticommutative
The operation of subtraction on the numbers is anticommutative. That is: :$a - b = b - a \iff a = b$
=== Natural Numbers === {{:Subtraction on Numbers is Anticommutative/Natural Numbers}}
The operation of [[Definition:Subtraction|subtraction]] on the [[Definition:Number|numbers]] is [[Definition:Anticommutative|anticommutative]]. That is: :$a - b = b - a \iff a = b$
=== [[Subtraction on Numbers is Anticommutative/Natural Numbers|Natural Numbers]] === {{:Subtraction on Numbers is Anticommutative/Natural Numbers}}
Subtraction on Numbers is Anticommutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subtraction_on_Numbers_is_Anticommutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subtraction_on_Numbers_is_Anticommutative
[ "Numbers", "Subtraction", "Examples of Anticommutativity", "Subtraction on Numbers is Anticommutative" ]
[ "Definition:Subtraction", "Definition:Number", "Definition:Anticommutative" ]
[ "Subtraction on Numbers is Anticommutative/Natural Numbers" ]
proofwiki-2950
Integer Addition is Commutative
The operation of addition on the set of integers $\Z$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \Z: x + y = y + x$
From the formal definition of integers, $\eqclass {a, b} {}$ is an equivalence class of ordered pairs of natural numbers. From Integers under Addition form Abelian Group, the integers under addition form an abelian group, from which commutativity follows {{afortiori}}. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Integer Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \Z: x + y = y + x$
From the [[Definition:Integer/Formal Definition|formal definition of integers]], $\eqclass {a, b} {}$ is an [[Definition:Equivalence Class|equivalence class]] of [[Definition:Ordered Pair|ordered pairs]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]]. From [[Integers under Addition form Abelian Group]], the [[Defin...
Integer Addition is Commutative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Commutative/Proof_1
[ "Integer Addition is Commutative", "Integer Addition", "Commutative Law of Addition", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Integer/Formal Definition", "Definition:Equivalence Class", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Integers under Addition form Abelian Group", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
proofwiki-2951
Integer Addition is Commutative
The operation of addition on the set of integers $\Z$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \Z: x + y = y + x$
Let $x = \eqclass {a, b} {}$ and $y = \eqclass {c, d} {}$ for some $x, y \in \Z$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x + y | r = \eqclass {a, b} {} + \eqclass {c, d} {} | c = {{Defof|Integer|subdef = Formal Definition}} }} {{eqn | r = \eqclass {a + c, b + d} {} | c = {{Defof|Integer Addition}} }} {{eqn |...
The operation of [[Definition:Integer Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \Z: x + y = y + x$
Let $x = \eqclass {a, b} {}$ and $y = \eqclass {c, d} {}$ for some $x, y \in \Z$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x + y | r = \eqclass {a, b} {} + \eqclass {c, d} {} | c = {{Defof|Integer|subdef = Formal Definition}} }} {{eqn | r = \eqclass {a + c, b + d} {} | c = {{Defof|Integer Addition}} }} {{eqn ...
Integer Addition is Commutative/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Commutative/Proof_2
[ "Integer Addition is Commutative", "Integer Addition", "Commutative Law of Addition", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Natural Number Addition is Commutative" ]
proofwiki-2952
Integer Addition is Associative
The operation of addition on the set of integers $\Z$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Z: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
From the formal definition of integers, $\eqclass {a, b} {}$ is an equivalence class of ordered pairs of natural numbers. From Integers under Addition form Abelian Group, the integers under addition form a group, from which associativity follows from {{Group-axiom|1}}. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Integer Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Z: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
From the [[Definition:Integer/Formal Definition|formal definition of integers]], $\eqclass {a, b} {}$ is an [[Definition:Equivalence Class|equivalence class]] of [[Definition:Ordered Pair|ordered pairs]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]]. From [[Integers under Addition form Abelian Group]], the [[Defin...
Integer Addition is Associative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Associative/Proof_1
[ "Integer Addition", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Integer Addition is Associative", "Associative Law of Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Integer/Formal Definition", "Definition:Equivalence Class", "Definition:Ordered Pair", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Integers under Addition form Abelian Group", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
proofwiki-2953
Integer Addition is Associative
The operation of addition on the set of integers $\Z$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Z: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Let $a, b, c, d, e, f \in \N$ such that: :$x = \eqclass {a, b} {}$, $y = \eqclass {c, d} {}$ and $z = \eqclass {e, f} {}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x + \paren {y + z} | r = \eqclass {a, b} {} + \paren {\eqclass {c, d} {} + \eqclass {e, f} {} } | c = {{Defof|Integer|subdef = Formal Definition}} }} {{e...
The operation of [[Definition:Integer Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Z: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Let $a, b, c, d, e, f \in \N$ such that: :$x = \eqclass {a, b} {}$, $y = \eqclass {c, d} {}$ and $z = \eqclass {e, f} {}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x + \paren {y + z} | r = \eqclass {a, b} {} + \paren {\eqclass {c, d} {} + \eqclass {e, f} {} } | c = {{Defof|Integer|subdef = Formal Definition}} }} ...
Integer Addition is Associative/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integer_Addition_is_Associative/Proof_2
[ "Integer Addition", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Integer Addition is Associative", "Associative Law of Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Integers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Natural Number Addition is Associative" ]
proofwiki-2954
Natural Number Addition is Commutative
The operation of addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is commutative: :$\forall m, n \in \N: m + n = n + m$
Consider the natural numbers defined as a naturally ordered semigroup. By definition, the operation in a naturally ordered semigroup is commutative. Hence the result. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall m, n \in \N: m + n = n + m$
Consider the [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] defined as a [[Definition:Naturally Ordered Semigroup|naturally ordered semigroup]]. By definition, the [[Definition:Binary Operation|operation]] in a [[Definition:Naturally Ordered Semigroup|naturally ordered semigroup]] is [[Definition:Commutative Operatio...
Natural Number Addition is Commutative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Commutative/Proof_1
[ "Natural Number Addition is Commutative", "Natural Number Addition", "Commutative Law of Addition", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Naturally Ordered Semigroup", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Naturally Ordered Semigroup", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
proofwiki-2955
Natural Number Addition is Commutative
The operation of addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is commutative: :$\forall m, n \in \N: m + n = n + m$
Proof by induction. Consider the natural numbers $\N$ defined as the elements of the minimally inductive set $\omega$. From the definition of addition in $\omega$, we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m + 0 | r = m }} {{eqn | l = m + n^+ | r = \paren {m + n}^+ }} {{end-eqn...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall m, n \in \N: m + n = n + m$
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]. Consider the [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ defined as the [[Definition:Element|elements]] of the [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Set|minimally inductive set]] $\omega$. From the definition of [[Definition:Addition in Minimally Inducti...
Natural Number Addition is Commutative/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Commutative/Proof_2
[ "Natural Number Addition is Commutative", "Natural Number Addition", "Commutative Law of Addition", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Set", "Definition:Addition in Minimally Inductive Set", "Definition:Proposition", "Natural Number Addition Commutes with Zero", "Definition:True", "Definition:Basis for the Indu...
proofwiki-2956
Natural Number Addition is Commutative
The operation of addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is commutative: :$\forall m, n \in \N: m + n = n + m$
Using the following axioms: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} Let $x \in \N_{> 0}$ be arbitrary. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$x + n = n + x$ === Basis for the Induction === From Natural Number Commutes with 1 under Addition, we have that: :$\forall x \in \N_{> 0}: x ...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall m, n \in \N: m + n = n + m$
Using the [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|following axioms]]: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} Let $x \in \N_{> 0}$ be arbitrary. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$x + n = n + x$ === Basis for the Induction === From [[Nat...
Natural Number Addition is Commutative/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Commutative/Proof_3
[ "Natural Number Addition is Commutative", "Natural Number Addition", "Commutative Law of Addition", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Proposition", "Natural Number Commutes with 1 under Addition", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Natural Number Addition is Associative", "Natural Number Addition is Comm...
proofwiki-2957
Natural Number Addition is Associative
The operation of addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Consider the natural numbers defined as a naturally ordered semigroup. By definition, the operation in a semigroup is associative. Hence the result. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Consider the [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] defined as a [[Definition:Naturally Ordered Semigroup|naturally ordered semigroup]]. By definition, the [[Definition:Binary Operation|operation]] in a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]] is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]. Hence the result....
Natural Number Addition is Associative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Associative/Proof_1
[ "Natural Number Addition", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Natural Number Addition is Associative", "Associative Law of Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Naturally Ordered Semigroup", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Semigroup", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
proofwiki-2958
Natural Number Addition is Associative
The operation of addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Consider the von Neumann construction of natural numbers $\N$, as elements of the minimally inductive set $\omega$. We are to show that: :$\paren {x + y} + n = x + \paren {y + n}$ for all $x, y, n \in \N$. From the definition of addition, we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m + 0 ...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Consider the [[Definition:Von Neumann Construction of Natural Numbers|von Neumann construction of natural numbers]] $\N$, as [[Definition:Element|elements]] of the [[Definition:Minimally Inductive Set|minimally inductive set]] $\omega$. We are to show that: :$\paren {x + y} + n = x + \paren {y + n}$ for all $x, y, n \...
Natural Number Addition is Associative/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Associative/Proof_2
[ "Natural Number Addition", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Natural Number Addition is Associative", "Associative Law of Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers/Von Neumann Construction", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Minimally Inductive Set", "Definition:Addition in Minimally Inductive Set", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Natura...
proofwiki-2959
Natural Number Addition is Associative
The operation of addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Using the following axioms: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} Let $x, y \in \N_{> 0}$ be arbitrary. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\paren {x + y} + n = x + \paren {y + n}$ === Basis for the Induction === From Axiom $\text C$, we have by definition that: :$\forall x, y ...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: x + \paren {y + z} = \paren {x + y} + z$
Using the [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|following axioms]]: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} Let $x, y \in \N_{> 0}$ be arbitrary. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\paren {x + y} + n = x + \paren {y + n}$ === Basis for ...
Natural Number Addition is Associative/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Addition_is_Associative/Proof_3
[ "Natural Number Addition", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Natural Number Addition is Associative", "Associative Law of Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Proposition", "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Natural Number Addition is Associative/Proof 3", "Natural Number Additi...
proofwiki-2960
Rational Multiplication is Commutative
The operation of multiplication on the set of rational numbers $\Q$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \Q: x \times y = y \times x$
Follows directly from the definition of rational numbers as the field of quotients of the integral domain $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of integers. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a field, and therefore a fortiori $\times$ is commutative on $\Q$. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Rational Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \Q: x \times y = y \times x$
Follows directly from the [[Definition:Rational Number|definition of rational numbers]] as the [[Definition:Field of Quotients|field of quotients]] of the [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Field (A...
Rational Multiplication is Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Multiplication_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Multiplication_is_Commutative
[ "Rational Multiplication", "Examples of Commutative Operations", "Commutative Law of Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Rational Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Field of Quotients", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:A Fortiori", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
proofwiki-2961
Rational Multiplication is Associative
The operation of multiplication on the set of rational numbers $\Q$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Q: x \times \paren {y \times z} = \paren {x \times y} \times z$
Follows directly from the definition of rational numbers as the field of quotients of the integral domain $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of integers. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a field, and therefore a fortiori $\times$ is associative on $\Q$. {{qed}}
The operation of [[Definition:Rational Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Q: x \times \paren {y \times z} = \paren {x \times y} \times z$
Follows directly from the [[Definition:Rational Number|definition of rational numbers]] as the [[Definition:Field of Quotients|field of quotients]] of the [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Field (A...
Rational Multiplication is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Multiplication_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Multiplication_is_Associative
[ "Rational Multiplication", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Associative Law of Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Rational Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Field of Quotients", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:A Fortiori", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
proofwiki-2962
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative
The operation of multiplication on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
Let $A, B$ be two (natural) numbers, and let $A$ by multiplying $B$ make $C$, and $B$ by multiplying $A$ make $D$. We need to show that $C = D$. :350px We have that $A \times B = C$. So $B$ measures $C$ according to the units of $A$. But the unit $E$ also measures $A$ according to the units in it. So $E$ measures $A$ t...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
Let $A, B$ be two [[Definition:Natural Number|(natural) numbers]], and let $A$ by [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplying]] $B$ make $C$, and $B$ by [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplying]] $A$ make $D$. We need to show that $C = D$. :[[File:Euclid-VII-16.png|350px]] We have that $A \t...
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative/Euclid's Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative/Euclid's_Proof
[ "Commutative Law of Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication", "Examples of Commutative Operations", "Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "File:Euclid-VII-16.png", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Unit (One)", "Definition:One", "Definition:Divisor (Algebra)/Integer", "Definition:Unit (One)", "Def...
proofwiki-2963
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative
The operation of multiplication on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
Natural number multiplication is recursively defined as: :$\forall m, n \in \N: \begin{cases} m \times 0 & = 0 \\ m \times \paren {n + 1} & = m \times n + m \end{cases}$ From the Principle of Recursive Definition, there is only one mapping $f$ satisfying this definition; that is, such that: :$\forall n \in \N: \begin{c...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
[[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|Natural number multiplication]] is [[Definition:Recursively Defined Mapping|recursively defined]] as: :$\forall m, n \in \N: \begin{cases} m \times 0 & = 0 \\ m \times \paren {n + 1} & = m \times n + m \end{cases}$ From the [[Principle of Recursive Definition]], there is onl...
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative/Proof_1
[ "Commutative Law of Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication", "Examples of Commutative Operations", "Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Recursively Defined Mapping", "Principle of Recursive Definition", "Definition:Mapping", "Zero is Zero Element for Natural Number Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Principle of Recursive Definition" ]
proofwiki-2964
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative
The operation of multiplication on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
Proof by induction: From the definition of natural number multiplication, we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m \times 0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = m \times n^+ | r = \paren {m \times n} + m }} {{end-eqn}} For all $n \in \N$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\forall m \in...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]: From the definition of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|natural number multiplication]], we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m \times 0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = m \times n^+ | r = \paren {m \times n} +...
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative/Proof_2
[ "Commutative Law of Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication", "Examples of Commutative Operations", "Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Proposition", "Zero is Zero Element for Natural Number Multiplication", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Natural Number Additi...
proofwiki-2965
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative
The operation of multiplication on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is commutative: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
Using the following axioms: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\forall a \in \N_{> 0}: a \times n = n \times a$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 1$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a \times 1 | r = a | c = Axiom $\...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]]: :$\forall x, y \in \N: x \times y = y \times x$
Using the [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|following axioms]]: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\forall a \in \N_{> 0}: a \times n = n \times a$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 1$ i...
Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Commutative/Proof_3
[ "Commutative Law of Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication", "Examples of Commutative Operations", "Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Commutative/Operation" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Proposition", "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Left Distributive La...
proofwiki-2966
Natural Number Multiplication is Associative
The operation of multiplication on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x \times y} \times z = x \times \paren {y \times z}$
From Index Laws for Semigroup: Product of Indices we have: :$+^{z \times y} x = \map {+^z} {+^y x}$ By definition of multiplication, this amounts to: :$x \times \paren {z \times y} = \paren {x \times y} \times z$ From Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative, we have: :$x \times \paren {z \times y} = x \times \pare...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x \times y} \times z = x \times \paren {y \times z}$
From [[Index Laws for Semigroup/Product of Indices|Index Laws for Semigroup: Product of Indices]] we have: :$+^{z \times y} x = \map {+^z} {+^y x}$ By definition of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]], this amounts to: :$x \times \paren {z \times y} = \paren {x \times y} \times z$ From [[Nat...
Natural Number Multiplication is Associative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Associative/Proof_1
[ "Natural Number Multiplication", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Natural Number Multiplication is Associative", "Associative Law of Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Index Laws/Product of Indices/Semigroup", "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Natural Number Multiplication is Commutative" ]
proofwiki-2967
Natural Number Multiplication is Associative
The operation of multiplication on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x \times y} \times z = x \times \paren {y \times z}$
We are to show that: :$\paren {x \times y} \times n = x \times \paren {y \times n}$ for all $x, y, n \in \N$. From the definition of natural number multiplication, we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m \times 0 | r = 0 | c = }} {{eqn | l = m \times \paren {n + 1} |...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x \times y} \times z = x \times \paren {y \times z}$
We are to show that: :$\paren {x \times y} \times n = x \times \paren {y \times n}$ for all $x, y, n \in \N$. From the definition of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|natural number multiplication]], we have that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m \times 0 | r = 0 | c =...
Natural Number Multiplication is Associative/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Associative/Proof_2
[ "Natural Number Multiplication", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Natural Number Multiplication is Associative", "Associative Law of Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Natural Number Multiplication is Associative/Proof 2", "Natural Number Addition is Commutative", "Natural Number ...
proofwiki-2968
Natural Number Multiplication is Associative
The operation of multiplication on the set of natural numbers $\N$ is associative: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x \times y} \times z = x \times \paren {y \times z}$
Using the following axioms: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} Let $x, y \in \N_{> 0}$ be arbitrary. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the proposition: :$\paren {x \times y} \times n = x \times \paren {y \times n}$ === Basis for the Induction === $\map P 1$ is the case: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn |...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x \times y} \times z = x \times \paren {y \times z}$
Using the [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|following axioms]]: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} Let $x, y \in \N_{> 0}$ be arbitrary. For all $n \in \N_{> 0}$, let $\map P n$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\paren {x \times y} \times n = x \times \paren {y \times...
Natural Number Multiplication is Associative/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_is_Associative/Proof_3
[ "Natural Number Multiplication", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Natural Number Multiplication is Associative", "Associative Law of Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Proposition", "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Axiom:Axiomatization...
proofwiki-2969
Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition
The operation of multiplication is distributive over addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N:$ ::$\paren {x + y} \times z = \paren {x \times z} + \paren {y \times z}$ ::$z \times \paren {x + y} = \paren {z \times x} + \paren {z \times y}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {x + y} \times z | r = +^z \paren {x + y} | c = {{Defof|Natural Number Multiplication}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {+^z x} + \paren {+^z y} | c = Power of Product of Commuting Elements in Semigroup equals Product of Powers }} {{eqn | r = x \times z + y \times z }} {{end-eqn...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N:$ ::$\paren {x + y} \time...
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {x + y} \times z | r = +^z \paren {x + y} | c = {{Defof|Natural Number Multiplication}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {+^z x} + \paren {+^z y} | c = [[Power of Product of Commuting Elements in Semigroup equals Product of Powers]] }} {{eqn | r = x \times z + y \times z }} {{end...
Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition/Proof_1
[ "Natural Number Addition", "Natural Number Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Power of Product of Commuting Elements in Semigroup equals Product of Powers", "Index Laws/Sum of Indices/Semigroup" ]
proofwiki-2970
Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition
The operation of multiplication is distributive over addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N:$ ::$\paren {x + y} \times z = \paren {x \times z} + \paren {y \times z}$ ::$z \times \paren {x + y} = \paren {z \times x} + \paren {z \times y}$
We are to show that: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x + y} \times z = \paren {x \times z} + \paren {y \times z}$ From the definition of natural number multiplication, we have by definition that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m \times 0 | r = 0 }} {{eqn | l = m \times n^+ | r =...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N:$ ::$\paren {x + y} \time...
We are to show that: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N: \paren {x + y} \times z = \paren {x \times z} + \paren {y \times z}$ From the definition of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|natural number multiplication]], we have by definition that: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall m, n \in \N | l = m \times 0 ...
Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition/Proof_2
[ "Natural Number Addition", "Natural Number Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Proposition", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition/Proof 2", "Natural Number Addition is Commutative/Proof 2",...
proofwiki-2971
Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition
The operation of multiplication is distributive over addition on the set of natural numbers $\N$: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N:$ ::$\paren {x + y} \times z = \paren {x \times z} + \paren {y \times z}$ ::$z \times \paren {x + y} = \paren {z \times x} + \paren {z \times y}$
Using the following axioms: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} === Left Distributive Law for Natural Numbers === First we show that: :$n \times \paren {x + y} = \paren {n \times x} + \paren {n \times y}$ {{:Left Distributive Law for Natural Numbers}}{{qed|lemma}} === Right Distributive Law for Natural...
The operation of [[Definition:Natural Number Multiplication|multiplication]] is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Natural Number Addition|addition]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$: :$\forall x, y, z \in \N:$ ::$\paren {x + y} \time...
Using the [[Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers|following axioms]]: {{:Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers}} === [[Left Distributive Law for Natural Numbers]] === First we show that: :$n \times \paren {x + y} = \paren {n \times x} + \paren {n \times y}$ {{:Left Distributive Law for Natural N...
Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Number_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition/Proof_3
[ "Natural Number Addition", "Natural Number Multiplication", "Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Addition/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Axiom:Axiomatization of 1-Based Natural Numbers", "Left Distributive Law for Natural Numbers", "Right Distributive Law for Natural Numbers" ]
proofwiki-2972
Distributive Laws/Arithmetic
On all the number systems: :natural numbers $\N$ :integers $\Z$ :rational numbers $\Q$ :real numbers $\R$ :complex numbers $\C$ the operation of multiplication is distributive over addition: :$m \paren {n + p} = m n + m p$ :$\paren {m + n} p = m p + n p$
This is demonstrated in these pages: :Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition :Integer Multiplication Distributes over Addition :Rational Multiplication Distributes over Addition :Real Multiplication Distributes over Addition :Complex Multiplication Distributes over Addition {{qed}}
On all the number systems: :[[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ :[[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ :[[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ :[[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ :[[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]] $\C$ the operation of [[Definition:Multiplication|multi...
This is demonstrated in these pages: :[[Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition]] :[[Integer Multiplication Distributes over Addition]] :[[Rational Multiplication Distributes over Addition]] :[[Real Multiplication Distributes over Addition]] :[[Complex Multiplication Distributes over Addition]] {{qed}}
Distributive Laws/Arithmetic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distributive_Laws/Arithmetic
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Distributive_Laws/Arithmetic
[ "Distributive Laws of Arithmetic", "Distributive Laws", "Multiplication", "Addition", "Examples of Distributive Operations", "Arithmetic", "Algebra" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Multiplication", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Addition" ]
[ "Natural Number Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Integer Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Rational Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Real Multiplication Distributes over Addition", "Complex Multiplication Distributes over Addition" ]
proofwiki-2973
Rational Multiplication Distributes over Addition
The operation of multiplication on the set of rational numbers $\Q$ is distributive over addition: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Q: x \times \paren {y + z} = \paren {x \times y} + \paren {x \times z}$ :$\forall x, y, z \in \Q: \paren {y + z} \times x = \paren {y \times x} + \paren {z \times x}$
Follows directly from the definition of rational numbers as the field of quotients of the integral domain $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of integers. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a field, and therefore {{afortiori}} $\times$ is distributive over $+$ on $\Q$. {{qed}} Category:Rational Addition Category:Rational Multiplica...
The operation of [[Definition:Rational Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ is [[Definition:Distributive Operation|distributive]] over [[Definition:Rational Addition|addition]]: :$\forall x, y, z \in \Q: x \times \paren {y + z} = \paren {...
Follows directly from the [[Definition:Rational Number|definition of rational numbers]] as the [[Definition:Field of Quotients|field of quotients]] of the [[Definition:Integral Domain|integral domain]] $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ of [[Definition:Integer|integers]]. So $\struct {\Q, +, \times}$ is a [[Definition:Field (A...
Rational Multiplication Distributes over Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rational_Multiplication_Distributes_over_Addition
[ "Rational Addition", "Rational Multiplication", "Examples of Distributive Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication/Rational Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Definition:Addition/Rational Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Field of Quotients", "Definition:Integral Domain", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Field (Abstract Algebra)", "Definition:Distributive Operation", "Category:Rational Addition", "Category:Rational Multiplication", "Category:Examples of Distributive Operatio...
proofwiki-2974
Associative Law of Multiplication
:$\forall x, y, z \in \mathbb F: x \times \paren {y \times z} = \paren {x \times y} \times z$ That is, the operation of multiplication on the standard number sets is associative.
Let a first magnitude $A$ be the same multiple of a second $B$ that a third $C$ is of a fourth $D$. Let equimultiples $EF, GH$ be taken of $A, C$. We need to show that $EF$ is the same multiple of $B$ that $GH$ is of $D$. We have that $EF$ is the same multiple of $A$ that $GH$ is of $C$. Therefore as many magnitudes as...
:$\forall x, y, z \in \mathbb F: x \times \paren {y \times z} = \paren {x \times y} \times z$ That is, the operation of [[Definition:Multiplication|multiplication]] on the [[Definition:Number|standard number sets]] is [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]].
Let a first [[Definition:Strictly Positive Real Number|magnitude]] $A$ be the same [[Definition:Multiple|multiple]] of a second $B$ that a third $C$ is of a fourth $D$. Let [[Definition:Equimultiples|equimultiples]] $EF, GH$ be taken of $A, C$. We need to show that $EF$ is the same multiple of $B$ that $GH$ is of $D$...
Associative Law of Multiplication/Euclid's Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Associative_Law_of_Multiplication
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Associative_Law_of_Multiplication/Euclid's_Proof
[ "Associative Law of Multiplication", "Numbers", "Examples of Associative Operations", "Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Multiplication", "Definition:Number", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Multiple", "Definition:Equimultiples", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Strictly Positive/R...
proofwiki-2975
Subtraction on Numbers is Not Associative
The operation of subtraction on the numbers is not associative. That is, in general: :$a - \paren {b - c} \ne \paren {a - b} - c$
By definition of subtraction: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a - \paren {b - c} | r = a + \paren {-\paren {b + \paren {-c} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = a + \paren {-b} + c | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {a - b} - c | r = \paren {a + \paren {-b} } + \paren {-c} | c = }} {{e...
The operation of [[Definition:Subtraction|subtraction]] on the [[Definition:Number|numbers]] is not [[Definition:Associative Operation|associative]]. That is, in general: :$a - \paren {b - c} \ne \paren {a - b} - c$
By definition of [[Definition:Subtraction|subtraction]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a - \paren {b - c} | r = a + \paren {-\paren {b + \paren {-c} } } | c = }} {{eqn | r = a + \paren {-b} + c | c = }} {{end-eqn}} {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {a - b} - c | r = \paren {a + \paren {-b} } + \...
Subtraction on Numbers is Not Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subtraction_on_Numbers_is_Not_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subtraction_on_Numbers_is_Not_Associative
[ "Subtraction on Numbers is Not Associative", "Numbers", "Subtraction", "Examples of Associative Operations" ]
[ "Definition:Subtraction", "Definition:Number", "Definition:Associative Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Subtraction" ]
proofwiki-2976
Identity Element of Multiplication on Numbers
On all the number systems: * natural numbers $\N$ * integers $\Z$ * rational numbers $\Q$ * real numbers $\R$ * complex numbers $\C$ the identity element of multiplication is one ($1$).
This is demonstrated in these pages: * Identity Element of Natural Number Multiplication is One * Integer Multiplication Identity is One * Rational Multiplication Identity is One * Real Multiplication Identity is One * Complex Multiplication Identity is One {{qed}}
On all the number systems: * [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ * [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ * [[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ * [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ * [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]] $\C$ the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity el...
This is demonstrated in these pages: * [[Identity Element of Natural Number Multiplication is One]] * [[Integer Multiplication Identity is One]] * [[Rational Multiplication Identity is One]] * [[Real Multiplication Identity is One]] * [[Complex Multiplication Identity is One]] {{qed}}
Identity Element of Multiplication on Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Element_of_Multiplication_on_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Element_of_Multiplication_on_Numbers
[ "Examples of Identity Elements", "Multiplication", "Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Multiplication", "Definition:One" ]
[ "Identity Element of Natural Number Multiplication is One", "Integer Multiplication Identity is One", "Rational Multiplication Identity is One", "Real Multiplication Identity is One", "Complex Multiplication Identity is One" ]
proofwiki-2977
Identity Element of Addition on Numbers
On all the number systems: * natural numbers $\N$ * integers $\Z$ * rational numbers $\Q$ * real numbers $\R$ * complex numbers $\C$ the identity element of addition is zero ($0$).
This is demonstrated in these pages: * Identity Element of Natural Number Addition is Zero * Integer Addition Identity is Zero * Rational Addition Identity is Zero * Real Addition Identity is Zero * Complex Addition Identity is Zero {{qed}}
On all the number systems: * [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $\N$ * [[Definition:Integer|integers]] $\Z$ * [[Definition:Rational Number|rational numbers]] $\Q$ * [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] $\R$ * [[Definition:Complex Number|complex numbers]] $\C$ the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity el...
This is demonstrated in these pages: * [[Identity Element of Natural Number Addition is Zero]] * [[Integer Addition Identity is Zero]] * [[Rational Addition Identity is Zero]] * [[Real Addition Identity is Zero]] * [[Complex Addition Identity is Zero]] {{qed}}
Identity Element of Addition on Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Element_of_Addition_on_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Identity_Element_of_Addition_on_Numbers
[ "Examples of Identity Elements", "Addition", "Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Complex Number", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Addition", "Definition:Zero (Number)" ]
[ "Identity Element of Natural Number Addition is Zero", "Integer Addition Identity is Zero", "Rational Addition Identity is Zero", "Real Addition Identity is Zero", "Complex Addition Identity is Zero" ]
proofwiki-2978
Zero Element is Unique
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be an algebraic structure that has a zero element $z \in S$. Then $z$ is unique.
Suppose $z_1$ and $z_2$ are both zeroes of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then by the definition of zero element: :$z_2 \circ z_1 = z_1$ by dint of $z_1$ being a zero :$z_2 \circ z_1 = z_2$ by dint of $z_2$ being a zero. So $z_1 = z_2 \circ z_1 = z_2$. So $z_1 = z_2$ and there is only one zero after all. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be an [[Definition:Algebraic Structure|algebraic structure]] that has a [[Definition:Zero Element|zero element]] $z \in S$. Then $z$ is [[Definition:Unique|unique]].
Suppose $z_1$ and $z_2$ are both zeroes of $\struct {S, \circ}$. Then by the definition of [[Definition:Zero Element|zero element]]: :$z_2 \circ z_1 = z_1$ by dint of $z_1$ being a [[Definition:Zero Element|zero]] :$z_2 \circ z_1 = z_2$ by dint of $z_2$ being a [[Definition:Zero Element|zero]]. So $z_1 = z_2 \circ z_...
Zero Element is Unique
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Element_is_Unique
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Element_is_Unique
[ "Zero Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Algebraic Structure", "Definition:Zero Element", "Definition:Unique" ]
[ "Definition:Zero Element", "Definition:Zero Element", "Definition:Zero Element", "Definition:Zero Element" ]
proofwiki-2979
Group with Zero Element is Trivial
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ have a zero element. Then $\struct {G, \circ}$ is the trivial group.
Let $e \in G$ be the identity element of $G$. Let $z \in G$ be a zero element. Let $x \in G$ be any arbitrary element of $\struct {G, \circ}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = x \circ e | c = {{Group-axiom|2}} }} {{eqn | r = x \circ \paren {z \circ z^{-1} } | c = {{Group-axiom|3}} }} {{eqn | r ...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ have a [[Definition:Zero Element|zero element]]. Then $\struct {G, \circ}$ is the [[Definition:Trivial Group|trivial group]].
Let $e \in G$ be the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] of $G$. Let $z \in G$ be a [[Definition:Zero Element|zero element]]. Let $x \in G$ be any arbitrary [[Definition:Element|element]] of $\struct {G, \circ}$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = x \circ e | c = {{Group-axiom|2}} }} {...
Group with Zero Element is Trivial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_with_Zero_Element_is_Trivial
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_with_Zero_Element_is_Trivial
[ "Group Theory", "Trivial Group", "Zero Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Zero Element", "Definition:Trivial Group" ]
[ "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Zero Element", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Trivial Group" ]
proofwiki-2980
Count of Binary Operations on Set
Let $S$ be a set whose cardinality is $n$. The number $N$ of different binary operations that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {n^2} }$
A binary operation on $S$ is by definition a mapping from the cartesian product $S \times S$ to the set $S$. Thus we are looking to evaluate: :$N = \card {\set {f: S \times S \to S} }$ The domain of $f$ has $n^2$ elements, from Cardinality of Cartesian Product of Finite Sets of Finite Sets. The result follows from Car...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] whose [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] is $n$. The number $N$ of different [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {n^2} }$
A [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operation]] on $S$ is by definition a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] from the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|cartesian product]] $S \times S$ to the set $S$. Thus we are looking to evaluate: :$N = \card {\set {f: S \times S \to S} }$ The [[Definition:Domain of Mapping|domain]] ...
Count of Binary Operations on Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_on_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_on_Set
[ "Combinatorics", "Abstract Algebra", "Count of Binary Operations on Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Domain (Set Theory)/Mapping", "Cardinality of Cartesian Product of Finite Sets of Finite Sets", "Cardinality of Set of All Mappings" ]
proofwiki-2981
Count of Commutative Binary Operations on Set
Let $S$ be a set whose cardinality is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different commutative binary operations that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\frac {n \paren {n + 1} } 2}$
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a magma. From Cardinality of Cartesian Product of Finite Sets, there are $n^2$ elements in $S \times S$. The binary operations $\circ$ is commutative {{iff}}: :$\forall x, y \in S: x \circ y = y \circ x$ Thus for every pair of elements $\tuple {x, y} \in S \times S$, it is required that $\tu...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] whose [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]] [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\frac {n \paren {n + 1} } 2}$
Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Magma|magma]]. From [[Cardinality of Cartesian Product of Finite Sets]], there are $n^2$ elements in $S \times S$. The [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] $\circ$ is [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]] {{iff}}: :$\forall x, y \in S: x \circ y = y \...
Count of Commutative Binary Operations on Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Commutative_Binary_Operations_on_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Commutative_Binary_Operations_on_Set
[ "Combinatorics", "Abstract Algebra", "Commutativity", "Count of Commutative Binary Operations on Set" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation" ]
[ "Definition:Magma", "Cardinality of Cartesian Product of Finite Sets", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Doubleton", "Cardinality of Set of Subsets", "Definition:Doubleton", "Cardinality of Set of All Mappings" ]
proofwiki-2982
Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity
Let $S$ be a set whose cardinality is $n$. Let $x \in S$. The number $N$ of possible different binary operations such that $x$ is an identity element that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {\paren {n - 1}^2} }$
Let $S$ be a set such that $\card S = n$. Let $x \in S$ be an identity element. From Count of Binary Operations on Set, there are $n^{\paren {n^2} }$ binary operations in total. We also know that $a \in S \implies a \circ x = a = x \circ a$, so all operations on $x$ are already specified. It remains to count all possib...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] whose [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] is $n$. Let $x \in S$. The number $N$ of possible different [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] such that $x$ is an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] such that $\card S = n$. Let $x \in S$ be an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]]. From [[Count of Binary Operations on Set]], there are $n^{\paren {n^2} }$ [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] in total. We also know that $a \in S \implies a \circ x = a = ...
Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_with_Fixed_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_with_Fixed_Identity
[ "Combinatorics", "Abstract Algebra", "Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Count of Binary Operations on Set", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Count of Binary Operations on Set", "Definition:Algebraic Structure/One Operation", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
proofwiki-2983
Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Fixed Identity
Let $S$ be a set whose cardinality is $n$. Let $x \in S$. The number $N$ of possible different commutative binary operations such that $x$ is an identity element that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\frac {n \paren {n - 1} } 2}$
This follows by the arguments of Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity and Count of Commutative Binary Operations on Set. From Count of Binary Operations on Set, there are $n^{\paren {n^2} }$ binary operations in total. We also know that: :$a \in S \implies a \circ x = a = x \circ a$ so all binary operations o...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] whose [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] is $n$. Let $x \in S$. The number $N$ of possible different [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]] [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] such that $x$ is an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] that can ...
This follows by the arguments of [[Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity]] and [[Count of Commutative Binary Operations on Set]]. From [[Count of Binary Operations on Set]], there are $n^{\paren {n^2} }$ [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] in total. We also know that: :$a \in S \implies a \cir...
Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Fixed Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Commutative_Binary_Operations_with_Fixed_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Commutative_Binary_Operations_with_Fixed_Identity
[ "Combinatorics", "Abstract Algebra", "Commutativity", "Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Fixed Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
[ "Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity", "Count of Commutative Binary Operations on Set", "Count of Binary Operations on Set", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Doubleton", "Cardinality of Set of Subsets", "De...
proofwiki-2984
Count of Binary Operations with Identity
Let $S$ be a set whose cardinality is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different binary operations which have an identity element that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {n - 1}^2 + 1}$
From Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity, there are $n^{\paren {n - 1}^2}$ such binary operations for each individual element of $S$. As Identity is Unique, if $x$ is the identity, no other element can also be an identity. As there are $n$ different ways of choosing such an identity, there are $n \times n^{\...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] whose [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] which have an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {n - 1}^2 + 1}$
From [[Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity]], there are $n^{\paren {n - 1}^2}$ such [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] for each individual [[Definition:Element|element]] of $S$. As [[Identity is Unique]], if $x$ is the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]], no other [[Definition:Element|el...
Count of Binary Operations with Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_with_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_with_Identity
[ "Combinatorics", "Abstract Algebra", "Count of Binary Operations with Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
[ "Count of Binary Operations with Fixed Identity", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Element", "Identity is Unique", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Identity (A...
proofwiki-2985
Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Identity
Let $S$ be a set whose cardinality is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different commutative binary operations that can be applied to $S$ which have an identity element is given by: :$N = n^{\frac {n \paren {n - 1} } 2 + 1}$
From Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Fixed Identity, there are $n^{\frac {n \paren {n - 1} } 2}$ such binary operations for each individual element of $S$. As Identity is Unique, if $x$ is the identity, no other element can also be an identity. As there are $n$ different ways of choosing such an identity, t...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] whose [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different [[Definition:Commutative Operation|commutative]] [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] that can be applied to $S$ which have an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] is g...
From [[Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Fixed Identity]], there are $n^{\frac {n \paren {n - 1} } 2}$ such [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] for each individual [[Definition:Element|element]] of $S$. As [[Identity is Unique]], if $x$ is the [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]], no other ...
Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Commutative_Binary_Operations_with_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Commutative_Binary_Operations_with_Identity
[ "Combinatorics", "Abstract Algebra", "Commutativity", "Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Commutative/Operation", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
[ "Count of Commutative Binary Operations with Fixed Identity", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Element", "Identity is Unique", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition...
proofwiki-2986
Count of Binary Operations Without Identity
Let $S$ be a set whose cardinality is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different binary operations which do not have an identity element that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {\paren {n - 1}^2 + 1} } \paren {n^{2 \paren {n - 1} } - 1}$
From Count of Binary Operations on Set, the total number of operations is $n^{\paren {n^2} }$. From Count of Binary Operations with Identity, the total number of operations with an identity is $n^{\paren {n - 1}^2 + 1}$. So the total number of operations without an identity is: :$n^{\paren {n^2} } - n^{\paren {n - 1}^2...
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] whose [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] is $n$. The number $N$ of possible different [[Definition:Binary Operation|binary operations]] which do not have an [[Definition:Identity Element|identity element]] that can be applied to $S$ is given by: :$N = n^{\paren {\paren {n - 1}^...
From [[Count of Binary Operations on Set]], the total number of operations is $n^{\paren {n^2} }$. From [[Count of Binary Operations with Identity]], the total number of operations with an identity is $n^{\paren {n - 1}^2 + 1}$. So the total number of operations without an identity is: :$n^{\paren {n^2} } - n^{\pare...
Count of Binary Operations Without Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_Without_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Count_of_Binary_Operations_Without_Identity
[ "Combinatorics", "Abstract Algebra", "Count of Binary Operations Without Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Operation/Binary Operation", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
[ "Count of Binary Operations on Set", "Count of Binary Operations with Identity" ]
proofwiki-2987
Power of Element in Subgroup
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group whose identity is $e$. Let $\struct {H, \circ}$ be a subgroup of $\struct {G, \circ}$. Let $x \in H$. Then: :$\forall n \in \Z: x^n \in H$
Proof by induction: For all $n \in \N^*$, let $\map P n$ be the compound proposition: :$x^n \in H \text{ and } x^{-n} \in H$. $\map P 0$ is true, as this just says $x^0 \in H$. By Powers of Group Elements, $x^0 = e$. This follows by Identity of Subgroup.
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] is $e$. Let $\struct {H, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Subgroup|subgroup]] of $\struct {G, \circ}$. Let $x \in H$. Then: :$\forall n \in \Z: x^n \in H$
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]: For all $n \in \N^*$, let $\map P n$ be the compound [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$x^n \in H \text{ and } x^{-n} \in H$. $\map P 0$ is true, as this just says $x^0 \in H$. By [[Powers of Group Elements]], $x^0 = e$. This follows by [[Identity ...
Power of Element in Subgroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Element_in_Subgroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Element_in_Subgroup
[ "Subgroups" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Subgroup" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Powers of Group Elements", "Identity of Subgroup", "Powers of Group Elements", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-2988
Element to Power of Remainder
:$\forall n \in \Z: n = q k + r: 0 \le r < k \iff a^n = a^r$
Let $n \in \Z$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n | r = q k + r | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = n - r | r = q k | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = k | o = \divides | r = \paren {n - r} | c = }} {{end-eqn}} The result follows from Equal Power...
:$\forall n \in \Z: n = q k + r: 0 \le r < k \iff a^n = a^r$
Let $n \in \Z$. We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n | r = q k + r | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = n - r | r = q k | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadstoandfrom | l = k | o = \divides | r = \paren {n - r} | c = }} {{end-eqn}} The result follows from [[Equal ...
Element to Power of Remainder
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_to_Power_of_Remainder
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_to_Power_of_Remainder
[ "Group Theory" ]
[]
[ "Equal Powers of Finite Order Element" ]
proofwiki-2989
Element to Power of Multiple of Order is Identity
:$\forall n \in \Z: k \divides n \iff a^n = e$
Let $k \in \N$ be the smallest such that $a^k = e$ as per the hypothesis.
:$\forall n \in \Z: k \divides n \iff a^n = e$
Let $k \in \N$ be the smallest such that $a^k = e$ as per the hypothesis.
Element to Power of Multiple of Order is Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_to_Power_of_Multiple_of_Order_is_Identity
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Element_to_Power_of_Multiple_of_Order_is_Identity
[ "Identity Elements", "Order of Group Elements" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-2990
List of Elements in Finite Cyclic Group
:$\set {a^0, a^1, a^2, \ldots, a^{k - 1} }$ is a complete repetition-free list of the elements of $\gen a$
By Element to Power of Remainder, every power of $a$ is equal to one appearing in the list $a^0, a^1, a^2, \ldots, a^{k - 1}$. This list has to be repetition free, otherwise it would contain $a^m = a^n$ with $0 \le m < n < k$ which contradicts the hypothesis. {{qed}}
:$\set {a^0, a^1, a^2, \ldots, a^{k - 1} }$ is a complete repetition-free list of the elements of $\gen a$
By [[Element to Power of Remainder]], every power of $a$ is equal to one appearing in the list $a^0, a^1, a^2, \ldots, a^{k - 1}$. This list has to be repetition free, otherwise it would contain $a^m = a^n$ with $0 \le m < n < k$ which contradicts the hypothesis. {{qed}}
List of Elements in Finite Cyclic Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Elements_in_Finite_Cyclic_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Elements_in_Finite_Cyclic_Group
[ "Finite Cyclic Groups" ]
[]
[ "Element to Power of Remainder" ]
proofwiki-2991
Equivalence of Definitions of Order of Group Element
{{TFAE|def = Order of Group Element}} Let $G$ be a group whose identity is $e$. Let $x \in G$.
Let $k$ be the order of $x$ in $G$ according to Definition 1. Let $l$ be the order of $x$ in $G$ according to Definition 3.
{{TFAE|def = Order of Group Element}} Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] is $e$. Let $x \in G$.
Let $k$ be the order of $x$ in $G$ according to [[Definition:Order of Group Element/Definition 1|Definition 1]]. Let $l$ be the order of $x$ in $G$ according to [[Definition:Order of Group Element/Definition 3|Definition 3]].
Equivalence of Definitions of Order of Group Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Order_of_Group_Element
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Order_of_Group_Element
[ "Subgroups", "Order of Group Elements" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity" ]
[ "Definition:Order of Group Element/Definition 1", "Definition:Order of Group Element/Definition 3", "Definition:Order of Group Element/Definition 3" ]
proofwiki-2992
Rising Sum of Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^m \binom {n + j} n = \binom {n + m + 1} {n + 1} = \binom {n + m + 1} m$
Proof by induction: Let $n \in \Z$. For all $m \in \N$, let $\map P m$ be the proposition: :$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^m \binom {n + j} n = \binom {n + m + 1} {n + 1}$ $\map P 0$ is true, as this just says: :$\dbinom n n = \dbinom {n + 1} {n + 1}$ But $\dbinom n n = \dbinom {n + 1} {n + 1} = 1$ from the {{Defof|Binomial...
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^m \binom {n + j} n = \binom {n + m + 1} {n + 1} = \binom {n + m + 1} m$
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]: Let $n \in \Z$. For all $m \in \N$, let $\map P m$ be the [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]]: :$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^m \binom {n + j} n = \binom {n + m + 1} {n + 1}$ $\map P 0$ is true, as this just says: :$\dbinom n n = \dbinom {n + 1} {n + 1}$ B...
Rising Sum of Binomial Coefficients/Proof by Induction
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rising_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Rising_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients/Proof_by_Induction
[ "Rising Sum of Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Basis for the Induction", "Definition:Induction Hypothesis", "Definition:Induction Step", "Rising Sum of Binomial Coefficients", "Pascal's Rule", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficien...
proofwiki-2993
Sum of Even Index Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \ge 0} \binom n {2 i} = 2^{n - 1}$
From Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index we have: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \in \Z} \binom n i = 2^n$ That is: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbinom n 1 + \dbinom n 2 + \dbinom n 3 + \cdots + \dbinom n n = 2^n$ as $\dbinom n i = 0$ for $i < 0$ and $i > n$. This can be written more conveniently as: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbinom n 1 +...
:$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \ge 0} \binom n {2 i} = 2^{n - 1}$
From [[Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index]] we have: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \in \Z} \binom n i = 2^n$ That is: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbinom n 1 + \dbinom n 2 + \dbinom n 3 + \cdots + \dbinom n n = 2^n$ as $\dbinom n i = 0$ for $i < 0$ and $i > n$. This can be written more conveniently as: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbino...
Sum of Even Index Binomial Coefficients/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Even_Index_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Even_Index_Binomial_Coefficients/Proof_1
[ "Sum of Even Index Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index", "Alternating Sum and Difference of Binomial Coefficients for Given n" ]
proofwiki-2994
Sum of Even Index Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \ge 0} \binom n {2 i} = 2^{n - 1}$
Let ${\N_n}^*$ be the initial segment of natural numbers, one-based. Let: :$E_n = \set {X : \paren {X \subset {\N_n}^*} \land \paren {2 \divides \size X} }$ :$O_n = \set {X : \paren {X \subset {\N_n}^*} \land \paren {2 \nmid \size X} }$ That is: :$E_n$ is the set of all subsets of ${\N_n}^*$ with an even number of elem...
:$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \ge 0} \binom n {2 i} = 2^{n - 1}$
Let ${\N_n}^*$ be the [[Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers|initial segment of natural numbers]], one-based. Let: :$E_n = \set {X : \paren {X \subset {\N_n}^*} \land \paren {2 \divides \size X} }$ :$O_n = \set {X : \paren {X \subset {\N_n}^*} \land \paren {2 \nmid \size X} }$ That is: :$E_n$ is the [[Defin...
Sum of Even Index Binomial Coefficients/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Even_Index_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Even_Index_Binomial_Coefficients/Proof_2
[ "Sum of Even Index Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Initial Segment of Natural Numbers", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Even Integer", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Odd Integer", "Definition:Element", "Cardinality of Set of Subsets", "Principle of Mathematical Induction", ...
proofwiki-2995
Sum of Odd Index Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \ge 0} \binom n {2 i + 1} = 2^{n - 1}$
From Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index we have: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \in \Z} \binom n i = 2^n$ That is: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbinom n 1 + \dbinom n 2 + \dbinom n 3 + \cdots + \dbinom n n = 2^n$ as $\dbinom n i = 0$ for $i < 0$ and $i > n$. This can be written more conveniently as: :$(1): \quad \dbinom n 0 + \d...
:$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \ge 0} \binom n {2 i + 1} = 2^{n - 1}$
From [[Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index]] we have: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop \in \Z} \binom n i = 2^n$ That is: :$\dbinom n 0 + \dbinom n 1 + \dbinom n 2 + \dbinom n 3 + \cdots + \dbinom n n = 2^n$ as $\dbinom n i = 0$ for $i < 0$ and $i > n$. This can be written more conveniently as: :$(1): \quad \dbinom n...
Sum of Odd Index Binomial Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Odd_Index_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Odd_Index_Binomial_Coefficients
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index", "Alternating Sum and Difference of Binomial Coefficients for Given n", "Definition:Even Integer" ]
proofwiki-2996
Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j = n 2^{n - 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n j \binom n j | c = as $0 \dbinom n 0 = 0$ }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n n \binom {n - 1} {j - 1} | c = Factors of Binomial Coefficient }} {{eqn | r = n \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \binom {n - 1} j ...
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j = n 2^{n - 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n j \binom n j | c = as $0 \dbinom n 0 = 0$ }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n n \binom {n - 1} {j - 1} | c = [[Factors of Binomial Coefficient]] }} {{eqn | r = n \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \binom {n - 1} j ...
Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients/Proof_1
[ "Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index" ]
proofwiki-2997
Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j = n 2^{n - 1}$
From the Binomial Theorem: :$(1): \quad \paren {1 + x}^n = \ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n \dbinom n j x^n$ Differentiating $(1)$ {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n \paren {1 + x}^{n - 1} | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n j \dbinom n j x^{j - 1} | c = Power Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | ll= \l...
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j = n 2^{n - 1}$
From the [[Binomial Theorem]]: :$(1): \quad \paren {1 + x}^n = \ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n \dbinom n j x^n$ [[Definition:Differentiation|Differentiating]] $(1)$ {{WRT|Differentiation}} $x$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = n \paren {1 + x}^{n - 1} | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n j \dbinom n j x^{j - 1} | c = [[Power...
Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients/Proof_2
[ "Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Binomial Theorem", "Definition:Differentiation", "Power Rule for Derivatives" ]
proofwiki-2998
Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j = n 2^{n - 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j | r = 0 \binom n 0 + 1 \binom n 1 + 2 \binom n 2 + 3 \binom n 3 + \cdots + \paren {n - 2} \binom n {n - 2} + \paren {n - 1} \binom n {n - 1} + n \binom n n | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | ll= \leadsto | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0...
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j = n 2^{n - 1}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n j \binom n j | r = 0 \binom n 0 + 1 \binom n 1 + 2 \binom n 2 + 3 \binom n 3 + \cdots + \paren {n - 2} \binom n {n - 2} + \paren {n - 1} \binom n {n - 1} + n \binom n n | c = }} {{eqn | n = 2 | ll= \leadsto | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0...
Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients/Proof_3
[ "Increasing Sum of Binomial Coefficients", "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Symmetry Rule for Binomial Coefficients", "Sum of Binomial Coefficients over Lower Index" ]
proofwiki-2999
Increasing Alternating Sum of Binomial Coefficients
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} j \binom n j = 0$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} j \binom n j | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} j \binom n j | c = as $0 \dbinom n 0 = 0$ }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} n \binom {n - 1} {j - 1} | c = Factors of Binomial Coefficient }} {{eqn...
:$\ds \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} j \binom n j = 0$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} j \binom n j | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} j \binom n j | c = as $0 \dbinom n 0 = 0$ }} {{eqn | r = \sum_{j \mathop = 1}^n \paren {-1}^{n + 1} n \binom {n - 1} {j - 1} | c = [[Factors of Binomial Coefficient]] }} {...
Increasing Alternating Sum of Binomial Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Alternating_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Increasing_Alternating_Sum_of_Binomial_Coefficients
[ "Binomial Coefficients" ]
[]
[ "Factors of Binomial Coefficient", "Translation of Index Variable of Summation", "Alternating Sum and Difference of Binomial Coefficients for Given n" ]