id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-4500
Tangent Function is Odd
:$\map \tan {-x} = -\tan x$ That is, the tangent function is odd.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {-x} | r = \frac {\map \sin {-x} } {\map \cos {-x} } | c = Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine }} {{eqn | r = \frac {-\sin x} {\cos x} | c = Sine Function is Odd; Cosine Function is Even }} {{eqn | r = -\tan x | c = Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine }} {{end-eqn...
:$\map \tan {-x} = -\tan x$ That is, the [[Definition:Real Tangent Function|tangent function]] is [[Definition:Odd Function|odd]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {-x} | r = \frac {\map \sin {-x} } {\map \cos {-x} } | c = [[Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac {-\sin x} {\cos x} | c = [[Sine Function is Odd]]; [[Cosine Function is Even]] }} {{eqn | r = -\tan x | c = [[Tangent is Sine divided by Cosin...
Tangent Function is Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_Function_is_Odd
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_Function_is_Odd
[ "Tangent Function", "Examples of Odd Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Tangent Function/Real", "Definition:Odd Function" ]
[ "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine", "Sine Function is Odd", "Cosine Function is Even", "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine" ]
proofwiki-4501
Tangent of Sum
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
First we note: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos \sum_j \theta_j + i \sin \sum_j \theta_j | r = \prod_j \paren {\cos \theta_j + i \sin \theta_j} | c = Product of Complex Numbers in Polar Form }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos \theta_j \prod_j \paren {1 + i \tan \theta_j} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos \the...
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
First we note: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos \sum_j \theta_j + i \sin \sum_j \theta_j | r = \prod_j \paren {\cos \theta_j + i \sin \theta_j} | c = [[Product of Complex Numbers in Polar Form]] }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos \theta_j \prod_j \paren {1 + i \tan \theta_j} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos ...
Tangent of Sum of Series of Angles/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum_of_Series_of_Angles/Proof_1
[ "Tangent of Sum", "Tangent Function", "Trigonometric Addition Formulas" ]
[]
[ "Product of Complex Numbers in Polar Form", "Product of Complex Numbers in Polar Form", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-4502
Tangent of Sum
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
First we note: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos \sum_j \theta_j + i \sin \sum_j \theta_j | r = \prod_j \paren {\cos \theta_j + i \sin \theta_j} | c = Product of Complex Numbers in Polar Form }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos \theta_j \prod_j \paren {1 + i \tan \theta_j} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos \the...
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
First we note: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cos \sum_j \theta_j + i \sin \sum_j \theta_j | r = \prod_j \paren {\cos \theta_j + i \sin \theta_j} | c = [[Product of Complex Numbers in Polar Form]] }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos \theta_j \prod_j \paren {1 + i \tan \theta_j} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \prod_j \cos ...
Tangent of Sum of Series of Angles/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum_of_Series_of_Angles/Proof_2
[ "Tangent of Sum", "Tangent Function", "Trigonometric Addition Formulas" ]
[]
[ "Product of Complex Numbers in Polar Form" ]
proofwiki-4503
Tangent of Sum
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {A + B + C} | r = \dfrac {\tan A + \map \tan {B + C} } {1 - \tan A \tan {B + C} } | c = Tangent of Sum }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\tan A + \frac {\tan B + \tan C} {1 - \tan B \tan C} } {1 - \tan A \frac {\tan B + \tan C} {1 - \tan B \tan C} } | c = Tangent of Sum }} {{e...
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {A + B + C} | r = \dfrac {\tan A + \map \tan {B + C} } {1 - \tan A \tan {B + C} } | c = [[Tangent of Sum]] }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac {\tan A + \frac {\tan B + \tan C} {1 - \tan B \tan C} } {1 - \tan A \frac {\tan B + \tan C} {1 - \tan B \tan C} } | c = [[Tangent of Sum]...
Tangent of Sum of Three Angles/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum_of_Three_Angles/Proof_2
[ "Tangent of Sum", "Tangent Function", "Trigonometric Addition Formulas" ]
[]
[ "Tangent of Sum", "Tangent of Sum", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator" ]
proofwiki-4504
Tangent of Sum
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
This is a special case of Tangent of Sum of Series of Angles, for $n = 3$. {{qed}}
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
This is a special case of [[Tangent of Sum of Series of Angles]], for $n = 3$. {{qed}}
Tangent of Sum of Three Angles/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum_of_Three_Angles/Proof_3
[ "Tangent of Sum", "Tangent Function", "Trigonometric Addition Formulas" ]
[]
[ "Tangent of Sum of Series of Angles" ]
proofwiki-4505
Tangent of Sum
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {a + b} | r = \frac {\map \sin {a + b} } {\map \cos {a + b} } | c = Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\sin a \cos b + \cos a \sin b} {\cos a \cos b - \sin a \sin b} | c = Sine of Sum and Cosine of Sum }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\frac {\sin a} {\cos ...
:$\map \tan {a + b} = \dfrac {\tan a + \tan b} {1 - \tan a \tan b}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map \tan {a + b} | r = \frac {\map \sin {a + b} } {\map \cos {a + b} } | c = [[Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\sin a \cos b + \cos a \sin b} {\cos a \cos b - \sin a \sin b} | c = [[Sine of Sum]] and [[Cosine of Sum]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac {\frac {\s...
Tangent of Sum/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Tangent_of_Sum/Proof
[ "Tangent of Sum", "Tangent Function", "Trigonometric Addition Formulas" ]
[]
[ "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine", "Sine of Sum", "Cosine of Sum", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine" ]
proofwiki-4506
Natural Logarithm Function is Differentiable
The (real) natural logarithm function is differentiable.
This proof assumes the definition of $\ln$ as: :$\ln x = \ds \int_1^x \frac 1 t \rd t$ As $\ln$ is defined as a definite integral, the result follows from the {{Corollary|Fundamental Theorem of Calculus/First Part|disp = Fundamental Theorem of Calculus}}. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Real Natural Logarithm|(real) natural logarithm function]] is [[Definition:Differentiable Real Function|differentiable]].
This proof assumes the [[Definition:Natural Logarithm/Positive Real/Definition 1|definition of $\ln$]] as: :$\ln x = \ds \int_1^x \frac 1 t \rd t$ As $\ln$ is defined as a [[Definition:Definite Integral|definite integral]], the result follows from the {{Corollary|Fundamental Theorem of Calculus/First Part|disp = Fund...
Natural Logarithm Function is Differentiable/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Logarithm_Function_is_Differentiable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Logarithm_Function_is_Differentiable/Proof_1
[ "Differential Calculus", "Natural Logarithms", "Natural Logarithm Function is Differentiable" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Logarithm/Positive Real", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Logarithm/Positive Real/Definition 1", "Definition:Definite Integral" ]
proofwiki-4507
Natural Logarithm Function is Differentiable
The (real) natural logarithm function is differentiable.
This proof assumes the definition of $\ln$ as the inverse of the exponential function. As the Exponential Function is Differentiable, the result follows from the differentiability of inverse functions. {{qed}}
The [[Definition:Real Natural Logarithm|(real) natural logarithm function]] is [[Definition:Differentiable Real Function|differentiable]].
This proof assumes the definition of $\ln$ as the [[Definition:Inverse Mapping|inverse]] of the [[Definition:Real Exponential Function|exponential function]]. As the [[Exponential Function is Differentiable]], the result follows from the [[Derivative of Inverse Function|differentiability of inverse functions]]. {{qed}...
Natural Logarithm Function is Differentiable/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Logarithm_Function_is_Differentiable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Natural_Logarithm_Function_is_Differentiable/Proof_2
[ "Differential Calculus", "Natural Logarithms", "Natural Logarithm Function is Differentiable" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Logarithm/Positive Real", "Definition:Differentiable Mapping/Real Function" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Exponential Function/Real", "Derivative of Exponential Function", "Derivative of Inverse Function" ]
proofwiki-4508
Countable Basis of Real Number Line
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Let $\BB$ be the set of subsets of $\R$ defined as: :$\BB = \set {\openint a b: a, b \in \Q,\ a < b}$ That is, $\BB$ is the set of open intervals of $\R$ whose endpoints are rational numbers. Then $\BB$ forms a countable basis of $\...
Let $U \in \tau_d$. Let $x \in U$. Let: :$\BB' = \set {\openint c d: c, d \in \R,\ c < d}$ By Basis for Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line, $\BB'$ is an analytic basis for the Euclidean topology on $\R$. Then let $\openint c d \in \BB'$ such that $x \in \openint c d \subseteq U$. That is, $c < x < d$. By Between tw...
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Let $\BB$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of subsets]] of $\R$ defined as: :$\BB = \set {\openint a b: a, b \in \Q,\ a < b}$ That is, $\BB$ is the [[Definition:Set|set]] ...
Let $U \in \tau_d$. Let $x \in U$. Let: :$\BB' = \set {\openint c d: c, d \in \R,\ c < d}$ By [[Basis for Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line]], $\BB'$ is an [[Definition:Analytic Basis|analytic basis]] for the [[Definition:Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line|Euclidean topology]] on $\R$. Then let $\openint c...
Countable Basis of Real Number Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Basis_of_Real_Number_Line
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Countable_Basis_of_Real_Number_Line
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Countable Bases", "Examples of Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Real Interval/Endpoints", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Countable Basis" ]
[ "Basis for Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Between two Real Numbers exists Rational Number", "Between two Real Numbers exists Rational Number", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Defini...
proofwiki-4509
Second-Countable Space is Separable
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a second-countable topological space. Then $T$ is also a separable space.
{{Recall|Separable Space|separable space}} {{:Definition:Separable Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a second-countable space. {{Recall|Second-Countable Space|second-countable space}} {{:Definition:Second-Countable Space}} By definition, there exists a countable basis $\BB$ for $\tau$. Using the {{Axiom-link|Count...
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable]] [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Then $T$ is also a [[Definition:Separable Space|separable space]].
{{Recall|Separable Space|separable space}} {{:Definition:Separable Space}} Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable space]]. {{Recall|Second-Countable Space|second-countable space}} {{:Definition:Second-Countable Space}} By definition, there exists a [[Definition:Countabl...
Second-Countable Space is Separable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second-Countable_Space_is_Separable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Second-Countable_Space_is_Separable
[ "Second-Countable Spaces", "Separable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Second-Countable Space", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Separable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Second-Countable Space", "Definition:Countable Basis", "Definition:Choice Function", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "Image of Countable Set under Mapping is Countable", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Everywhere Dense", "Equivalence of Definitions of Analytic Basis",...
proofwiki-4510
Real Number Line is Second-Countable
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a second-countable space.
From Countable Basis of Real Number Line we have that $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ has a countable basis. The result follows directly from the definition of a second-countable space. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable space]].
From [[Countable Basis of Real Number Line]] we have that $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ has a [[Definition:Countable Basis|countable basis]]. The result follows directly from the definition of a [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable space]]. {{qed}}
Real Number Line is Second-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Second-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Second-Countable
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Second-Countable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Second-Countable Space" ]
[ "Countable Basis of Real Number Line", "Definition:Countable Basis", "Definition:Second-Countable Space" ]
proofwiki-4511
Real Number Line is not Countably Compact
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is not a countably compact space.
Let $\CC$ be the set of subsets of $\R$ defined as: :$\CC = \set {\openint n {n + 2}: n \in \Z}$ Then $\CC$ is an open cover of $\R$ which is countable. However, there is no finite subcover for $\R$ of $\CC$. Hence the result, by definition of countably compact. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is not a [[Definition:Countably Compact Space|countably compact space]].
Let $\CC$ be the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of subsets]] of $\R$ defined as: :$\CC = \set {\openint n {n + 2}: n \in \Z}$ Then $\CC$ is an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] of $\R$ which is [[Definition:Countable Set|countable]]. However, there is no [[Definition:Finite Subcover|finite subcover]] for $\R$ of $\C...
Real Number Line is not Countably Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_not_Countably_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_not_Countably_Compact
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Countably Compact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Countably Compact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Countably Compact Space" ]
proofwiki-4512
Real Number Line is Locally Compact Hausdorff Space
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a locally compact Hausdorff space.
We have that a Real Number Line satisfies all Separation Axioms. Specifically, $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a Hausdorff space. Consider $\CC$ the set of subsets of $\R$ defined as: :$\CC = \set {\closedint n {n + 1}: n \in \Z}$ where $\closedint n {n + 1}$ is the closed real interval between successive integers. By the He...
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a [[Definition:Locally Compact Hausdorff Space|locally compact Hausdorff space]].
We have that a [[Real Number Line satisfies all Separation Axioms]]. Specifically, $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a [[Definition:Hausdorff Space|Hausdorff space]]. Consider $\CC$ the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of subsets]] of $\R$ defined as: :$\CC = \set {\closedint n {n + 1}: n \in \Z}$ where $\closedint n {n + 1}$ i...
Real Number Line is Locally Compact Hausdorff Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Locally_Compact_Hausdorff_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Locally_Compact_Hausdorff_Space
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Locally Compact Hausdorff Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Locally Compact Hausdorff Space" ]
[ "Real Number Line satisfies all Separation Axioms", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Integer", "Heine-Borel Theorem", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Locally Compact Hausdorff Space" ]
proofwiki-4513
Real Number Line is Sigma-Compact
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a $\sigma$-compact space.
We have that a Real Number Line satisfies all Separation Axioms. Specifically, $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a Hausdorff space. Consider $\CC$ the set of subsets of $\R$ defined as: :$\CC = \set {\closedint n {n + 1}: n \in \Z}$ where $\closedint n {n + 1}$ is the closed real interval between successive integers. By the He...
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a [[Definition:Sigma-Compact Space|$\sigma$-compact space]].
We have that a [[Real Number Line satisfies all Separation Axioms]]. Specifically, $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a [[Definition:Hausdorff Space|Hausdorff space]]. Consider $\CC$ the [[Definition:Set of Sets|set of subsets]] of $\R$ defined as: :$\CC = \set {\closedint n {n + 1}: n \in \Z}$ where $\closedint n {n + 1}$ i...
Real Number Line is Sigma-Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Sigma-Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Sigma-Compact
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Sigma-Compact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Sigma-Compact Space" ]
[ "Real Number Line satisfies all Separation Axioms", "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Set of Sets", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Integer", "Heine-Borel Theorem", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Biject...
proofwiki-4514
Closed Subset of Real Number Line is G-Delta
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Let $H \subseteq \R$ be a closed subset of $\R$. Then $H$ is a $G_\delta$ set.
We have: :Real Number Line is Metric Space :Closed Set in Metric Space is $G_\delta$ Hence the result. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Let $H \subseteq \R$ be a [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed subset]] of $\R$. Then $H$ is a [[Definition:G-Delta Set|$G_\delta$ set]].
We have: :[[Real Number Line is Metric Space]] :[[Closed Set in Metric Space is G-Delta|Closed Set in Metric Space is $G_\delta$]] Hence the result. {{qed}}
Closed Subset of Real Number Line is G-Delta
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Subset_of_Real_Number_Line_is_G-Delta
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Subset_of_Real_Number_Line_is_G-Delta
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of G-Delta Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:G-Delta Set" ]
[ "Real Number Line is Metric Space", "Closed Set in Metric Space is G-Delta" ]
proofwiki-4515
Real Number Line is Paracompact
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is paracompact.
Let $\CC$ be an open cover for $\R$. Then $\CC$ covers each of the closed real intervals $\closedint n {n + 1}$ for all $n \in \Z$. By the Heine-Borel Theorem, each of $\closedint n {n + 1}$ is compact. So, for each of these intervals $\closedint n {n + 1}$, it follows that $\CC$ can be reduced to a sequence $\sequence...
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Then $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is [[Definition:Paracompact Space|paracompact]].
Let $\CC$ be an [[Definition:Open Cover|open cover]] for $\R$. Then $\CC$ covers each of the [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real intervals]] $\closedint n {n + 1}$ for all $n \in \Z$. By the [[Heine-Borel Theorem]], each of $\closedint n {n + 1}$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]]. So, for...
Real Number Line is Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Paracompact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_is_Paracompact
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Paracompact Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Paracompact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Heine-Borel Theorem", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Refinement of Cover", "Definition:Locally Finite Cover", "Definition:Paracompact Space" ]
proofwiki-4516
Real Number Line with Off-Center Distance Function is Quasimetric Space
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology. Then $\tau_d$ can be given by a quasimetric defined as: :<nowiki>$\map d {x, y} = \begin {cases} y - x & : y \ge x \\ 2 \paren {x - y} & : y < x \end {cases}$</nowiki> Thus $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ is a quasimetric space.
To show that $\map d {x, y}$ is a quasimetric, we need to show that $d: \R \times \R \to \R$ satisfies the following conditions for all $x, y, z \in \R$: {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(\text M 1):|$\map d {x, x} {{=}} 0$}} {{item|(\text M 2):|$\map d {x, y} + \map d {y, z} \ge \map d {x, z}$}} {{item|(\text M 4):|$x \ne y \...
Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) topology]]. Then $\tau_d$ can be given by a [[Definition:Quasimetric|quasimetric]] defined as: :<nowiki>$\map d {x, y} = \begin {cases} y - x & : y \ge x \\ 2 \paren {x - y} & : y < x \e...
To show that $\map d {x, y}$ is a [[Definition:Quasimetric|quasimetric]], we need to show that $d: \R \times \R \to \R$ satisfies the following conditions for all $x, y, z \in \R$: {{begin-itemize}} {{item|(\text M 1):|$\map d {x, x} {{=}} 0$}} {{item|(\text M 2):|$\map d {x, y} + \map d {y, z} \ge \map d {x, z}$}} {{...
Real Number Line with Off-Center Distance Function is Quasimetric Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_with_Off-Center_Distance_Function_is_Quasimetric_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_with_Off-Center_Distance_Function_is_Quasimetric_Space
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Quasimetric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Quasimetric", "Definition:Quasimetric/Quasimetric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Quasimetric" ]
proofwiki-4517
NAND with Equal Arguments
:$p \uparrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the NAND of a proposition with itself corresponds to the negation operation.
{{BeginTableau|p \uparrow p \vdash \neg p}} {{Premise|1|p \uparrow p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \land p}|1|Definition of Logical NAND}} {{Idempotence|3|1|\neg p|2|Conjunction}} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|\neg p \vdash p \uparrow p}} {{Premise|1|\neg p}} {{Idempotence|2|1|\neg \paren {p \land p}|1|Conj...
:$p \uparrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the [[Definition:Logical NAND|NAND]] of a [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]] with itself corresponds to the [[Definition:Logical Not|negation]] operation.
{{BeginTableau|p \uparrow p \vdash \neg p}} {{Premise|1|p \uparrow p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \land p}|1|Definition of [[Definition:Logical NAND|Logical NAND]]}} {{Idempotence|3|1|\neg p|2|Conjunction}} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|\neg p \vdash p \uparrow p}} {{Premise|1|\neg p}} {{Idempotence|2|1|...
NAND with Equal Arguments/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_with_Equal_Arguments
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_with_Equal_Arguments/Proof_1
[ "Logical NAND", "NAND with Equal Arguments" ]
[ "Definition:Logical NAND", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Logical Not" ]
[ "Definition:Logical NAND", "Definition:Logical NAND" ]
proofwiki-4518
NAND with Equal Arguments
:$p \uparrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the NAND of a proposition with itself corresponds to the negation operation.
We apply the Method of Truth Tables: :$\begin{array}{|ccc||cc|} \hline p & \uparrow & p & \neg & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \F \\ \T & \F & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the main connectives match for all boolean interpretations. {{qed}}
:$p \uparrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the [[Definition:Logical NAND|NAND]] of a [[Definition:Proposition|proposition]] with itself corresponds to the [[Definition:Logical Not|negation]] operation.
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]: :$\begin{array}{|ccc||cc|} \hline p & \uparrow & p & \neg & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \F \\ \T & \F & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Logi...
NAND with Equal Arguments/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_with_Equal_Arguments
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_with_Equal_Arguments/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Logical NAND", "NAND with Equal Arguments" ]
[ "Definition:Logical NAND", "Definition:Proposition", "Definition:Logical Not" ]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-4519
NAND is Commutative
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash q \uparrow p$
{{BeginTableau|p \uparrow q \vdash q \uparrow p}} {{Premise|1|p \uparrow q}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \land q}|1|{{Defof|Logical NAND}} }} {{Commutation|3|1|\neg \paren {q \land p}|2|Conjunction}} {{SequentIntro|4|1|q \uparrow p|3|{{Defof|Logical NAND}} }} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|q \uparrow p \vdas...
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash q \uparrow p$
{{BeginTableau|p \uparrow q \vdash q \uparrow p}} {{Premise|1|p \uparrow q}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \land q}|1|{{Defof|Logical NAND}} }} {{Commutation|3|1|\neg \paren {q \land p}|2|Conjunction}} {{SequentIntro|4|1|q \uparrow p|3|{{Defof|Logical NAND}} }} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|q \uparrow p \vd...
NAND is Commutative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_Commutative/Proof_1
[ "Logical NAND", "NAND is Commutative", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-4520
NAND is Commutative
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash q \uparrow p$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables: :$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccc|} \hline p & \uparrow & q & q & \uparrow & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \T & \T & \T & \F \\ \T & \T & \F & \F & \T & \T \\ \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the m...
:$p \uparrow q \dashv \vdash q \uparrow p$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]: :$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccc|} \hline p & \uparrow & q & q & \uparrow & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \T & \T & \T & \F \\ \T & \T & \F & \F & \T & \T \\ \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Trut...
NAND is Commutative/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_Commutative/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Logical NAND", "NAND is Commutative", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-4521
NAND is not Associative
:$p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r$
{{BeginTableau|\neg \paren {\paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r \implies p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} } }} {{Assumption|1|\paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r \implies p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} }} {{Assumption|2|p \land \neg r}} {{Simplification|3|2|p|2|1}} {{Simplification|4|2|\neg r|2|2}} {{Addition|5|2|\paren {\...
:$p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r$
{{BeginTableau|\neg \paren {\paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r \implies p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} } }} {{Assumption|1|\paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r \implies p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} }} {{Assumption|2|p \land \neg r}} {{Simplification|3|2|p|2|1}} {{Simplification|4|2|\neg r|2|2}} {{Addition|5|2|\paren {\...
NAND is not Associative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_not_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_not_Associative/Proof_1
[ "Logical NAND", "NAND is not Associative" ]
[]
[ "Disjunction and Conditional" ]
proofwiki-4522
NAND is not Associative
:$p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r$
We apply the Method of Truth Tables: :$\begin{array}{|ccccc||ccccc|} \hline p & \uparrow & (q & \uparrow & r) & (p & \uparrow & q) & \uparrow & r \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T \\ \F & \T & \T & \T & \F & \F & \T & \T & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \...
:$p \uparrow \paren {q \uparrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \uparrow q} \uparrow r$
We apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]: :$\begin{array}{|ccccc||ccccc|} \hline p & \uparrow & (q & \uparrow & r) & (p & \uparrow & q) & \uparrow & r \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F & \T & \F \\ \F & \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T \\ \F & \T & \T & \T & \F & \F & \T & \T & \T & \F \\ \F & \...
NAND is not Associative/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_not_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NAND_is_not_Associative/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Logical NAND", "NAND is not Associative" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-4523
NOR with Equal Arguments
:$p \downarrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the NOR of a proposition with itself corresponds to the negation operator.
{{BeginTableau|p \downarrow p \vdash \neg p}} {{Premise|1|p \downarrow p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \lor p}|1|Definition of Logical NOR}} {{Idempotence|3|1|\neg p|2|Disjunction}} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|\neg p \vdash p \downarrow p}} {{Premise|1|\neg p}} {{Idempotence|2|1|\neg \paren {p \lor p}|1|D...
:$p \downarrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the [[Definition:Logical NOR|NOR]] of a proposition with itself corresponds to the [[Definition:Logical Not|negation]] operator.
{{BeginTableau|p \downarrow p \vdash \neg p}} {{Premise|1|p \downarrow p}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \lor p}|1|Definition of [[Definition:Logical NOR|Logical NOR]]}} {{Idempotence|3|1|\neg p|2|Disjunction}} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|\neg p \vdash p \downarrow p}} {{Premise|1|\neg p}} {{Idempotence|2...
NOR with Equal Arguments/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_with_Equal_Arguments
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_with_Equal_Arguments/Proof_1
[ "Logical NOR", "NOR with Equal Arguments" ]
[ "Definition:Logical NOR", "Definition:Logical Not" ]
[ "Definition:Logical NOR", "Definition:Logical NOR" ]
proofwiki-4524
NOR with Equal Arguments
:$p \downarrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the NOR of a proposition with itself corresponds to the negation operator.
Apply the Method of Truth Tables: :$\begin {array} {|ccc||cc|} \hline p & \downarrow & p & \neg & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \F \\ \T & \F & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the main connectives match for all boolean interpretations. {{qed}}
:$p \downarrow p \dashv \vdash \neg p$ That is, the [[Definition:Logical NOR|NOR]] of a proposition with itself corresponds to the [[Definition:Logical Not|negation]] operator.
Apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]: :$\begin {array} {|ccc||cc|} \hline p & \downarrow & p & \neg & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \T & \F \\ \T & \F & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Truth Value|truth values]] under the [[Definition:Main Connective (Propositional Log...
NOR with Equal Arguments/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_with_Equal_Arguments
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_with_Equal_Arguments/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Logical NOR", "NOR with Equal Arguments" ]
[ "Definition:Logical NOR", "Definition:Logical Not" ]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-4525
NOR is Commutative
:$p \downarrow q \dashv \vdash q \downarrow p$
{{BeginTableau|p \downarrow q \vdash q \downarrow p}} {{Premise|1|p \downarrow q}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \lor q}|1|{{Defof|Logical NOR}} }} {{Commutation|3|1|\neg \paren {q \lor p}|2|Disjunction}} {{SequentIntro|4|1|q \uparrow p|3|{{Defof|Logical NOR}} }} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|q \downarrow p \...
:$p \downarrow q \dashv \vdash q \downarrow p$
{{BeginTableau|p \downarrow q \vdash q \downarrow p}} {{Premise|1|p \downarrow q}} {{SequentIntro|2|1|\neg \paren {p \lor q}|1|{{Defof|Logical NOR}} }} {{Commutation|3|1|\neg \paren {q \lor p}|2|Disjunction}} {{SequentIntro|4|1|q \uparrow p|3|{{Defof|Logical NOR}} }} {{EndTableau|lemma}} {{BeginTableau|q \downarrow p...
NOR is Commutative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_Commutative/Proof_1
[ "Logical NOR", "NOR is Commutative", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[]
[]
proofwiki-4526
NOR is Commutative
:$p \downarrow q \dashv \vdash q \downarrow p$
Apply the Method of Truth Tables: :$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccc|} \hline p & \downarrow & q & q & \downarrow & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F \\ \F & \F & \T & \T & \F & \F \\ \T & \F & \F & \F & \F & \T \\ \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the truth values under the ...
:$p \downarrow q \dashv \vdash q \downarrow p$
Apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]: :$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccc|} \hline p & \downarrow & q & q & \downarrow & p \\ \hline \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F \\ \F & \F & \T & \T & \F & \F \\ \T & \F & \F & \F & \F & \T \\ \T & \F & \T & \T & \F & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$ As can be seen by inspection, the [[Definition:Tru...
NOR is Commutative/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_Commutative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_Commutative/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Logical NOR", "NOR is Commutative", "Examples of Commutative Operations" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-4527
NOR is not Associative
:$p \downarrow \paren {q \downarrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \downarrow q} \downarrow r$
{{BeginTableau|\neg \paren {p \downarrow \paren {q \downarrow r} \implies \paren {p \downarrow q} \downarrow r} }} {{Assumption|1|\neg p \land r}} {{Simplification|2|1|\neg p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|r|1|2}} {{Addition|4|1|q \lor r|3|2}} {{DoubleNegIntro|5|1|\neg \neg \paren {q \lor r}|4}} {{SequentIntro|6|1|\neg \pa...
:$p \downarrow \paren {q \downarrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \downarrow q} \downarrow r$
{{BeginTableau|\neg \paren {p \downarrow \paren {q \downarrow r} \implies \paren {p \downarrow q} \downarrow r} }} {{Assumption|1|\neg p \land r}} {{Simplification|2|1|\neg p|1|1}} {{Simplification|3|1|r|1|2}} {{Addition|4|1|q \lor r|3|2}} {{DoubleNegIntro|5|1|\neg \neg \paren {q \lor r}|4}} {{SequentIntro|6|1|\neg \pa...
NOR is not Associative/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_not_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_not_Associative/Proof_1
[ "Logical NOR", "NOR is not Associative" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Logical NOR", "Definition:Logical NOR", "Definition:Logical NOR", "Rule of Material Implication" ]
proofwiki-4528
NOR is not Associative
:$p \downarrow \paren {q \downarrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \downarrow q} \downarrow r$
Apply the Method of Truth Tables: :$\begin{array}{|ccccc||ccccc|} \hline p & \downarrow & (q & \downarrow & r) & (p & \downarrow & q) & \downarrow & r \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F & \F & \F \\ \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T \\ \F & \T & \T & \F & \F & \F & \F & \T & \T & \F \\ \F & \...
:$p \downarrow \paren {q \downarrow r} \not \vdash \paren {p \downarrow q} \downarrow r$
Apply the [[Method of Truth Tables]]: :$\begin{array}{|ccccc||ccccc|} \hline p & \downarrow & (q & \downarrow & r) & (p & \downarrow & q) & \downarrow & r \\ \hline \F & \F & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F & \F & \F \\ \F & \T & \F & \F & \T & \F & \T & \F & \F & \T \\ \F & \T & \T & \F & \F & \F & \F & \T & \T & \F \\ \...
NOR is not Associative/Proof by Truth Table
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_not_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/NOR_is_not_Associative/Proof_by_Truth_Table
[ "Logical NOR", "NOR is not Associative" ]
[]
[ "Method of Truth Tables", "Definition:Truth Value", "Definition:Main Connective/Propositional Logic", "Definition:Boolean Interpretation" ]
proofwiki-4529
Representation of Ternary Expansions
Let $x \in \R$ be a real number. Let $x$ be represented in base $3$ notation. While it may be possible for $x$ to have two different such representations, for example: :$\dfrac 1 3 = 0.100000 \ldots_3 = 0.022222 \ldots_3$ it is not possible for $x$ be written in more than one way without using the digit $1$.
It is sufficient to show that two distinct representations represents two distinct numbers. Let $a$ and $b$ two real numbers representable as the form above. Their signs are easy to distinguish, so we consider $\size a$ and $\size b$. There is some $n$ such that: :$\size a, \size b < 3^n$ In that case, $\dfrac {\size a...
Let $x \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Let $x$ be represented in [[Definition:Ternary Notation|base $3$ notation]]. While it may be possible for $x$ to have two different such representations, for example: :$\dfrac 1 3 = 0.100000 \ldots_3 = 0.022222 \ldots_3$ it is not possible for $x$ be written...
It is sufficient to show that two distinct representations represents two distinct numbers. Let $a$ and $b$ two [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]] representable as the form above. Their signs are easy to distinguish, so we consider $\size a$ and $\size b$. There is some $n$ such that: :$\size a, \size b < 3^n$ ...
Representation of Ternary Expansions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Representation_of_Ternary_Expansions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Representation_of_Ternary_Expansions
[ "Ternary Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Ternary Notation" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Integer", "Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence" ]
proofwiki-4530
Equivalence of Definitions of Cantor Set
{{TFAE|def = Cantor Set|view = the Cantor Set $\CC$}}:
Let $\CC_n$ be defined as in $(1)$. Let $x \in \closedint 0 1$. We need to show that: :$x$ can be written in base $3$ without using the digit $1$ {{iff}}: ::$\forall n \in \Z, n \ge 1: x \in C_n$ First we note that from Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence: :$\ds 1 = \sum_{n \mathop = 0}^\infty \frac 2 3 \paren {\frac 1 ...
{{TFAE|def = Cantor Set|view = the Cantor Set $\CC$}}:
Let $\CC_n$ be defined as in $(1)$. Let $x \in \closedint 0 1$. We need to show that: :$x$ can be written in [[Definition:Ternary Notation|base $3$]] without using the digit $1$ {{iff}}: ::$\forall n \in \Z, n \ge 1: x \in C_n$ First we note that from [[Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence]]: :$\ds 1 = \sum_{n \matho...
Equivalence of Definitions of Cantor Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Cantor_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Cantor_Set
[ "Cantor Set" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Ternary Notation", "Sum of Infinite Geometric Sequence" ]
proofwiki-4531
Vertices in Locally Finite Graph
Let $G$ be a locally finite graph. Then if $G$ is infinite, it contains an infinite number of vertices.
Suppose $G = \struct {V, E}$ has a finite number of vertices. Let $V = \set {v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_n}$ where $n = \card V$ is the cardinality of $V$. As $G$ is locally finite, each element of $V$ has a finite number of incident edges. For each $v_k \in V$, let $r_k$ be the degree of $v_k$. Then: :$\ds \card E \le \sum_{i...
Let $G$ be a [[Definition:Locally Finite Graph|locally finite graph]]. Then if $G$ is [[Definition:Infinite Graph|infinite]], it contains an [[Definition:Infinite|infinite]] number of [[Definition:Vertex of Graph|vertices]].
Suppose $G = \struct {V, E}$ has a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] number of [[Definition:Vertex of Graph|vertices]]. Let $V = \set {v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_n}$ where $n = \card V$ is the [[Definition:Cardinality|cardinality]] of $V$. As $G$ is [[Definition:Locally Finite Graph|locally finite]], each element of $V$ has ...
Vertices in Locally Finite Graph
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vertices_in_Locally_Finite_Graph
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Vertices_in_Locally_Finite_Graph
[ "Graph Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Finite Graph", "Definition:Infinite Graph", "Definition:Infinite", "Definition:Graph (Graph Theory)/Vertex" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Graph (Graph Theory)/Vertex", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Locally Finite Graph", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Incident (Graph Theory)", "Definition:Degree of Vertex", "Definition:Cardinality", "Definition:Graph (Graph Theory)/Edge", "Definitio...
proofwiki-4532
Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space
Let $\CC$ be the Cantor set. Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number space $\R$ under the Euclidean topology $\tau_d$. Then $\CC$ is a closed subset of $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$.
By definition, the Cantor set is the complement of a union of open sets relative to the closed interval $\closedint 0 1$. By the definition of a topology, that union is itself open in $\R$. The closed interval $\closedint 0 1$ is itself the complement of a union of open sets $\openint \gets 0 \cup \openint 1 \to$. Henc...
Let $\CC$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Set|Cantor set]]. Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number space]] $\R$ under the [[Definition:Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line|Euclidean topology]] $\tau_d$. Then $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed subset]] of $\struct {...
By [[Definition:Cantor Set/Limit of Intersections|definition]], the [[Definition:Cantor Set|Cantor set]] is the [[Definition:Relative Complement|complement]] of a [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open sets]] relative to the [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] $\closedin...
Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Set_is_Closed_in_Real_Number_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Set_is_Closed_in_Real_Number_Space
[ "Cantor Set", "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Closed Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Set", "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Set/Limit of Intersections", "Definition:Cantor Set", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Real Inte...
proofwiki-4533
Word Metric is Metric
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group. Let $S$ be a generating set for $G$ which is closed under inverses (that is, $x^{-1} \in S \iff x \in S$). Let $d_S$ be the associated word metric. Then $d_S$ is a metric on $G$.
Let $g, h \in G$. It is given that $S$ is a generating set for $G$. It follows that there exist $s_1, \ldots, s_n \in S$ such that $g^{-1} \circ h = s_1 \circ \cdots \circ s_n$. Therefore $\map {d_S} {g, h} \le n$, establishing that $\R$ is a valid codomain for the mapping $d_S$ with domain $G \times G$. This is the fo...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Generator of Group|generating set]] for $G$ which is closed under inverses (that is, $x^{-1} \in S \iff x \in S$). Let $d_S$ be the associated [[Definition:Word Metric|word metric]]. Then $d_S$ is a [[Definition:Metric|metric]] on $...
Let $g, h \in G$. It is given that $S$ is a [[Definition:Generator of Group|generating set]] for $G$. It follows that there exist $s_1, \ldots, s_n \in S$ such that $g^{-1} \circ h = s_1 \circ \cdots \circ s_n$. Therefore $\map {d_S} {g, h} \le n$, establishing that $\R$ is a valid codomain for the [[Definition:Mapp...
Word Metric is Metric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Word_Metric_is_Metric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Word_Metric_is_Metric
[ "Group Theory", "Word Metric" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Generator of Group", "Definition:Word Metric", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric" ]
[ "Definition:Generator of Group", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric" ]
proofwiki-4534
Cantor Space is Compact
Let $\CC$ be the Cantor set. Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the real number space $\R$ under the Euclidean topology $\tau_d$. Then $\CC$ is a compact subset of $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$.
We have Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space. Taking, for example, $0 \in \CC$ and $1 \in \R$ it is clear that: :$\forall x \in \CC: \map d {0, x} \le 1$ and so $\CC$ is bounded. Hence the result from the Heine-Borel Theorem. {{qed}}
Let $\CC$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Set|Cantor set]]. Let $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number space]] $\R$ under the [[Definition:Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line|Euclidean topology]] $\tau_d$. Then $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Compact Topological Subspace|compact subset]] of $\...
We have [[Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space]]. Taking, for example, $0 \in \CC$ and $1 \in \R$ it is clear that: :$\forall x \in \CC: \map d {0, x} \le 1$ and so $\CC$ is [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]]. Hence the result from the [[Heine-Borel Theorem]]. {{qed}}
Cantor Space is Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Compact
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Compact Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Set", "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace" ]
[ "Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Heine-Borel Theorem" ]
proofwiki-4535
Cantor Space is Complete Metric Space
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is a complete metric space.
We have that the Cantor space is a metric subspace of the real number space $\R$, and hence a metric space. We also have Cantor Space is Compact. The result follows from Compact Metric Space is Complete. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete metric space]].
We have that the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]] is a [[Definition:Metric Subspace|metric subspace]] of the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number space]] $\R$, and hence a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. We also have [[Cantor Space is Compact]]. The result follows from [[Compact Metric Space is...
Cantor Space is Complete Metric Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Complete_Metric_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Complete_Metric_Space
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Complete Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Metric Space", "Cantor Space is Compact", "Compact Metric Space is Complete" ]
proofwiki-4536
Cantor Space satisfies all Separation Axioms
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ satisfies all the separation axioms.
We have that the Cantor space is a metric subspace of the real number space $\R$, and hence a metric space. The result follows from Metric Space fulfils all Separation Axioms. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ satisfies all the [[Definition:Separation Axioms|separation axioms]].
We have that the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]] is a [[Definition:Metric Subspace|metric subspace]] of the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number space]] $\R$, and hence a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. The result follows from [[Metric Space fulfils all Separation Axioms]]. {{qed}}
Cantor Space satisfies all Separation Axioms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_satisfies_all_Separation_Axioms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_satisfies_all_Separation_Axioms
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Separation Axioms" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Tychonoff Separation Axioms" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Metric Space", "Metric Space fulfils all Separation Axioms" ]
proofwiki-4537
Cantor Space is Second-Countable
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is a second-countable space.
We have that the Cantor space is a topological subspace of the real number space with the usual (Euclidean) topology $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$. We also have that the Real Number Line is Second-Countable. The result follows from Second-Countability is Hereditary. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is a [[Definition:Second-Countable Space|second-countable space]].
We have that the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]] is a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|topological subspace]] of the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number space with the usual (Euclidean) topology]] $\struct {\R, \tau_d}$. We also have that the [[Real Number Line is Second-Countab...
Cantor Space is Second-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Second-Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Second-Countable
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Second-Countable Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Second-Countable Space" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Real Number Line is Second-Countable", "Second-Countability is Hereditary" ]
proofwiki-4538
Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is dense-in-itself.
{{Recall|Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself}} {{:Definition:Dense-in-itself}} Let $U \in \tau_d$ be open in $T$. Let $p \in U$. Then: :$\exists x \in U: \exists \epsilon \in \R: \map d {x, p} < \epsilon$ Thus $p$ is not an isolated point of $\T$. Hence the result by definition of dense-in-itself. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself]].
{{Recall|Dense-in-itself|dense-in-itself}} {{:Definition:Dense-in-itself}} Let $U \in \tau_d$ be [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $T$. Let $p \in U$. Then: :$\exists x \in U: \exists \epsilon \in \R: \map d {x, p} < \epsilon$ Thus $p$ is not an [[Definition:Isolated Point of Subset|isolated point]] of $\T...
Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Dense-in-itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Dense-in-itself
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Dense-in-itself" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Dense-in-itself" ]
[ "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)/Subset", "Definition:Dense-in-itself" ]
proofwiki-4539
Cantor Space is not Scattered
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is not scattered.
{{Recall|Scattered Space|scattered space}} {{:Definition:Scattered Space/Definition 1}} We have that Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself. Hence the result by definition of a scattered space. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is not [[Definition:Scattered Space|scattered]].
{{Recall|Scattered Space|scattered space}} {{:Definition:Scattered Space/Definition 1}} We have that [[Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself]]. Hence the result by definition of a [[Definition:Scattered Space|scattered space]]. {{qed}}
Cantor Space is not Scattered
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_not_Scattered
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_not_Scattered
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Scattered Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Scattered Space" ]
[ "Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself", "Definition:Scattered Space" ]
proofwiki-4540
Cantor Space is Perfect
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $\CC$ is a perfect set of the real number space $\R$ under the usual (Euclidean) topology $\tau_d$.
{{Recall|Perfect Set|perfect set}} {{:Definition:Perfect Set/Definition 2}} From Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself, $\CC$ contains no isolated points. We also have that the Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space. The result follows from the definition of perfect set. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $\CC$ is a [[Definition:Perfect Set|perfect set]] of the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number space]] $\R$ under the [[Definition:Euclidean Topology on Real Number Line|usual (Euclidean) topology]] $\tau_d$.
{{Recall|Perfect Set|perfect set}} {{:Definition:Perfect Set/Definition 2}} From [[Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself]], $\CC$ contains no [[Definition:Isolated Point of Topological Space|isolated points]]. We also have that the [[Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space]]. The result follows from the definition of [[...
Cantor Space is Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Perfect
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Perfect
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Perfect Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Perfect Set", "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line" ]
[ "Cantor Space is Dense-in-itself", "Definition:Isolated Point (Topology)/Space", "Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space", "Definition:Perfect Set" ]
proofwiki-4541
Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is nowhere dense in $\closedint 0 1$.
From Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space, $\CC$ is closed. So from Closed Set equals its Closure: :$\CC^- = \CC$ where $\CC^-$ denotes the closure of $\CC$. Let $0 \le a < b \le 1$. Then $I = \openint a b$ is an open interval of $\closedint 0 1$. Let $\epsilon = b - a$. Clearly $\epsilon > 0$. Let $n \in \N$ such...
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Nowhere Dense|nowhere dense]] in $\closedint 0 1$.
From [[Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space]], $\CC$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]]. So from [[Closed Set equals its Closure]]: :$\CC^- = \CC$ where $\CC^-$ denotes the [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]] of $\CC$. Let $0 \le a < b \le 1$. Then $I = \openint a b$ is an [[Definition:Open R...
Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Nowhere_Dense
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Nowhere_Dense/Proof_1
[ "Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense", "Cantor Space", "Examples of Nowhere Dense" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Nowhere Dense" ]
[ "Cantor Set is Closed in Real Number Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Set is Closed iff Equals Topological Closure", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:R...
proofwiki-4542
Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is nowhere dense in $\closedint 0 1$.
Let $S_n$ and $C_n$ be as in the definition of the Cantor set as a limit of a decreasing sequence. Then the length of every interval in $S_n$ is seen to be $\dfrac 1 {3^n} = 3^{-n}$. Let $0 \le a < b \le 1$. Then $\openint a b \subseteq \closedint 0 1$ is an open interval. Let $n \in \N$ such that $3^{-n} < b - a$, so ...
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Nowhere Dense|nowhere dense]] in $\closedint 0 1$.
Let $S_n$ and $C_n$ be as in the definition of the [[Definition:Cantor Set/Limit of Decreasing Sequence|Cantor set as a limit of a decreasing sequence]]. Then the [[Definition:Length of Real Interval|length]] of every [[Definition:Real Interval|interval]] in $S_n$ is seen to be $\dfrac 1 {3^n} = 3^{-n}$. Let $0 \le ...
Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Nowhere_Dense
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Nowhere_Dense/Proof_2
[ "Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense", "Cantor Space", "Examples of Nowhere Dense" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Nowhere Dense" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Set/Limit of Decreasing Sequence", "Definition:Real Interval/Length", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Real Interval/Length", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Real Interval/Lengt...
proofwiki-4543
Cantor Space is Meager in Closed Unit Interval
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is meager in $\closedint 0 1$.
From Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense, $T$ is nowhere dense in $\closedint 0 1$. So, trivially, $\CC$ is the union of nowhere dense subsets of $\closedint 0 1$. Hence the result from definition of meager. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Meager Space|meager]] in $\closedint 0 1$.
From [[Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense]], $T$ is [[Definition:Nowhere Dense|nowhere dense]] in $\closedint 0 1$. So, trivially, $\CC$ is the [[Definition:Set Union|union]] of [[Definition:Nowhere Dense|nowhere dense]] subsets of $\closedint 0 1$. Hence the result from definition of [[Definition:Meager Space|meager]]. {...
Cantor Space is Meager in Closed Unit Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Meager_in_Closed_Unit_Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Meager_in_Closed_Unit_Interval
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Meager Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Meager Space" ]
[ "Cantor Space is Nowhere Dense", "Definition:Nowhere Dense", "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Nowhere Dense", "Definition:Meager Space" ]
proofwiki-4544
Cantor Space is Non-Meager in Itself
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is non-meager in itself.
We have that the Cantor Space is Complete Metric Space. By Baire Category Theorem, a complete metric space is also a Baire space. The result then follows by Baire Space is Non-Meager. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Non-Meager Space|non-meager]] in itself.
We have that the [[Cantor Space is Complete Metric Space]]. By [[Baire Category Theorem]], a [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete metric space]] is also a [[Definition:Baire Space|Baire space]]. The result then follows by [[Baire Space is Non-Meager]]. {{qed}}
Cantor Space is Non-Meager in Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Non-Meager_in_Itself
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Non-Meager_in_Itself
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Non-Meager Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Meager Space/Non-Meager" ]
[ "Cantor Space is Complete Metric Space", "Baire Category Theorem", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Baire Space", "Baire Space is Non-Meager" ]
proofwiki-4545
Cantor Set is Uncountable
The Cantor set $\CC$ is uncountable.
From the definition as a ternary representation, $\CC$ consists of all the elements of $\closedint 0 1$ which can be written without using a $1$. So let $x \in \CC$. Then in base $3$ notation, we have (as $0 \le x \le 1$): :$\ds x = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^\infty r_j 3^{-j}$ From the definition of the Cantor set, we have ...
The [[Definition:Cantor Set|Cantor set]] $\CC$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountable]].
From the definition as a [[Definition:Cantor Set/Ternary Representation|ternary representation]], $\CC$ consists of all the elements of $\closedint 0 1$ which can be written without using a $1$. So let $x \in \CC$. Then in [[Definition:Ternary Notation|base $3$ notation]], we have (as $0 \le x \le 1$): :$\ds x = \sum...
Cantor Set is Uncountable/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Set_is_Uncountable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Set_is_Uncountable/Proof_1
[ "Cantor Set is Uncountable", "Cantor Set", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Set", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Set/Ternary Representation", "Definition:Ternary Notation", "Definition:Cantor Set/Ternary Representation", "Representation of Ternary Expansions", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Binary Notation", "Existence of Base-N Representation", "Definition:Surjection", "Closed Interval i...
proofwiki-4546
Cantor Set is Uncountable
The Cantor set $\CC$ is uncountable.
It follows from Representation of Ternary Expansions that every string of the form $0.nnnnn \ldots$ where $n \in \set {0, 2}$ is an element of $\CC$. We also have that every string of the form $0.nnnnn \ldots$ where $n \in \set {0, 1}$ is an element of $\closedint 0 1 \subset \R$ expressed in binary notation. Let $f: \...
The [[Definition:Cantor Set|Cantor set]] $\CC$ is [[Definition:Uncountable Set|uncountable]].
It follows from [[Representation of Ternary Expansions]] that every string of the form $0.nnnnn \ldots$ where $n \in \set {0, 2}$ is an element of $\CC$. We also have that every string of the form $0.nnnnn \ldots$ where $n \in \set {0, 1}$ is an element of $\closedint 0 1 \subset \R$ expressed in [[Definition:Binary N...
Cantor Set is Uncountable/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Set_is_Uncountable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Set_is_Uncountable/Proof_2
[ "Cantor Set is Uncountable", "Cantor Set", "Examples of Uncountable Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Set", "Definition:Uncountable/Set" ]
[ "Representation of Ternary Expansions", "Definition:Binary Notation", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Ternary Notation", "Definition:Surjection" ]
proofwiki-4547
Equality is Symmetric
:$\forall a, b: a = b \implies b = a$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \vdash | l = \map P a | o = \iff | r = \map P b | c = Leibniz's Law }} {{eqn | ll= \vdash | l = \map P b | o = \iff | r = \map P a | c = Biconditional is Commutative }} {{eqn | ll= \vdash | l = b ...
:$\forall a, b: a = b \implies b = a$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a | r = b | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \vdash | l = \map P a | o = \iff | r = \map P b | c = [[Axiom:Leibniz's Law|Leibniz's Law]] }} {{eqn | ll= \vdash | l = \map P b | o = \iff | r = \map P a | c = [[Biconditional is Commutative]] }} {{eqn...
Equality is Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equality_is_Symmetric
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equality_is_Symmetric
[ "Logic", "Equality" ]
[]
[ "Axiom:Leibniz's Law", "Biconditional is Commutative", "Axiom:Leibniz's Law" ]
proofwiki-4548
Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine Function
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\sinh u} = \cosh u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sinh u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\sinh u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = \cosh u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\sinh u} = \cosh u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sinh u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\sinh u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r = \cosh u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Sine_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Sine_Function
[ "Derivatives of Hyperbolic Functions", "Hyperbolic Sine Function", "Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Hyperbolic Sine" ]
proofwiki-4549
Derivative of Hyperbolic Cosine Function
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\cosh u} = \sinh u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\cosh u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\cosh u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = \sinh u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Derivative of Hyperbolic Cosine }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\cosh u} = \sinh u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\cosh u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\cosh u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r = \sinh u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Derivative of Hyperbolic Cosine]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Derivative of Hyperbolic Cosine Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Cosine_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Cosine_Function
[ "Derivatives of Hyperbolic Functions", "Hyperbolic Cosine Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Hyperbolic Cosine" ]
proofwiki-4550
Cantor Space is Totally Separated
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is totally separated.
Let $a, b \in \CC$ such that $a < b$. Then $b - a = \epsilon$. Consider $n \in \N$ such that $3^{-n} < \epsilon$. {{wtd|To be proved that between $a + 3^{-\paren {n + 1} }$ and $a + 2 \times 3^{-\paren {n + 1} }$ there exists an interval $I$ which is excluded from $\CC$. Or something like that.<br/>Then we pick some $r...
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is [[Definition:Totally Separated Space|totally separated]].
Let $a, b \in \CC$ such that $a < b$. Then $b - a = \epsilon$. Consider $n \in \N$ such that $3^{-n} < \epsilon$. {{wtd|To be proved that between $a + 3^{-\paren {n + 1} }$ and $a + 2 \times 3^{-\paren {n + 1} }$ there exists an interval $I$ which is excluded from $\CC$. Or something like that.<br/>Then we pick some...
Cantor Space is Totally Separated
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Totally_Separated
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_Totally_Separated
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Totally Separated Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Totally Separated Space" ]
[ "Definition:Separation (Topology)", "Definition:Separation (Topology)", "Definition:Totally Separated Space" ]
proofwiki-4551
Cantor Space is not Extremally Disconnected
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is not extremally disconnected.
{{Recall|Extremally Disconnected Space|extremally disconnected space}} {{:Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space/Definition 3}} Consider the real number $\dfrac 1 4 = 0.020202 \ldots_3$. We have that: :$C_1 := \CC \cap \hointr 0 {\dfrac 1 4}$ :$C_2 := \CC \cap \hointl {\dfrac 1 4} 1$ are disjoint sets both of which a...
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is not [[Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space|extremally disconnected]].
{{Recall|Extremally Disconnected Space|extremally disconnected space}} {{:Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space/Definition 3}} Consider the [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] $\dfrac 1 4 = 0.020202 \ldots_3$. We have that: :$C_1 := \CC \cap \hointr 0 {\dfrac 1 4}$ :$C_2 := \CC \cap \hointl {\dfrac 1 4} 1$ are ...
Cantor Space is not Extremally Disconnected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_not_Extremally_Disconnected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_not_Extremally_Disconnected
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Extremally Disconnected Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Extremally Disconnected Space" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Disjoint Sets", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Closure (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-4552
Cantor Space as Countably Infinite Product
Let $A_n = \struct {\set {0, 2}, \tau_n}$ be the discrete space of the two points $0$ and $2$. Let $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$. Let $\struct {A, \tau}$ be the product space where $\tau$ is the product topology on $A$. Then $A$ is homeomorphic to the Cantor space.
In $\CC$, basis elements are sets of the form $\set {y: \size {x - y} < \epsilon}$ for $x \in \CC$ and some $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. In $\ds \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$, sets of the form $\set {\sequence {a_i} \in \prod A_n: a_i \text { is fixed for } 1 \le i \le n}$ forms a basis for the product topology. Conside...
Let $A_n = \struct {\set {0, 2}, \tau_n}$ be the [[Definition:Discrete Space|discrete space]] of the two points $0$ and $2$. Let $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$. Let $\struct {A, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Product Space|product space]] where $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]] on...
In $\CC$, [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] elements are sets of the form $\set {y: \size {x - y} < \epsilon}$ for $x \in \CC$ and some $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. In $\ds \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$, sets of the form $\set {\sequence {a_i} \in \prod A_n: a_i \text { is fixed for } 1 \le i \le n}$ forms a [[Defi...
Cantor Space as Countably Infinite Product/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_as_Countably_Infinite_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_as_Countably_Infinite_Product/Proof_1
[ "Cantor Space as Countably Infinite Product", "Cantor Space", "Examples of Product Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Product Space", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Cantor Space" ]
[ "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere" ]
proofwiki-4553
Cantor Space as Countably Infinite Product
Let $A_n = \struct {\set {0, 2}, \tau_n}$ be the discrete space of the two points $0$ and $2$. Let $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$. Let $\struct {A, \tau}$ be the product space where $\tau$ is the product topology on $A$. Then $A$ is homeomorphic to the Cantor space.
Since $\CC$ is a metric space, $\CC$ is Hausdorff. By Tychonoff's Theorem, $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$ is compact. Consider the function $f$ taking each point from $\tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n, \ldots}$ in $\prod A_n$ to the point $0 \cdotp a_1 a_2 \ldots a_n \ldots_3$ in $\CC$. $f$ is a bijection. In ...
Let $A_n = \struct {\set {0, 2}, \tau_n}$ be the [[Definition:Discrete Space|discrete space]] of the two points $0$ and $2$. Let $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$. Let $\struct {A, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Product Space|product space]] where $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]] on...
Since $\CC$ is a metric space, $\CC$ is Hausdorff. By [[Tychonoff's Theorem]], $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$ is compact. Consider the [[Definition:Real Function|function]] $f$ taking each point from $\tuple {a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n, \ldots}$ in $\prod A_n$ to the point $0 \cdotp a_1 a_2 \ldots a_n \ldots_3$...
Cantor Space as Countably Infinite Product/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_as_Countably_Infinite_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_as_Countably_Infinite_Product/Proof_2
[ "Cantor Space as Countably Infinite Product", "Cantor Space", "Examples of Product Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Product Space", "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Definition:Cantor Space" ]
[ "Tychonoff's Theorem", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Product Space is T2 iff Factor Spaces are T2", "Continuous Bijection from Compact to Hausdorff is Homeomorphism" ]
proofwiki-4554
Cantor Space is not Locally Connected
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Then $T$ is not locally connected.
Let $\BB$ be a basis of $T$. Let $A \in \BB$. By definition of $\BB$, $A$ is an open set of $T$. But the Cantor Space is Totally Separated. Therefore $A$ is not a connected set. Hence the result from definition of a locally connected space. {{qed}}
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Then $T$ is not [[Definition:Locally Connected Space|locally connected]].
Let $\BB$ be a [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] of $T$. Let $A \in \BB$. By definition of $\BB$, $A$ is an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open set]] of $T$. But the [[Cantor Space is Totally Separated]]. Therefore $A$ is not a [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected set]]. Hence the result from defi...
Cantor Space is not Locally Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_not_Locally_Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cantor_Space_is_not_Locally_Connected
[ "Cantor Space", "Examples of Locally Connected Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Locally Connected Space" ]
[ "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Cantor Space is Totally Separated", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Definition:Locally Connected Space" ]
proofwiki-4555
Local Connectedness is not Preserved under Infinite Product
The property of local connectedness is not preserved under the operation of forming an infinite product space.
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the Cantor space. Let $A_n = \struct {\set {0, 2}, \tau_n}$ be the discrete space of the two points $0$ and $2$. Let $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$. Let $T' = \struct {A, \tau}$ be the product space where $\tau$ is the product topology on $A$. From Cantor Space as Countabl...
The property of [[Definition:Locally Connected Space|local connectedness]] is not preserved under the operation of forming an [[Definition:Infinite Set|infinite]] [[Definition:Product Space|product space]].
Let $T = \struct {\CC, \tau_d}$ be the [[Definition:Cantor Space|Cantor space]]. Let $A_n = \struct {\set {0, 2}, \tau_n}$ be the [[Definition:Discrete Space|discrete space]] of the two points $0$ and $2$. Let $\ds A = \prod_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty A_n$. Let $T' = \struct {A, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Product Space|...
Local Connectedness is not Preserved under Infinite Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Local_Connectedness_is_not_Preserved_under_Infinite_Product
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Local_Connectedness_is_not_Preserved_under_Infinite_Product
[ "Locally Connected Spaces", "Product Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Locally Connected Space", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Product Space" ]
[ "Definition:Cantor Space", "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Product Space", "Definition:Product Topology", "Cantor Space as Countably Infinite Product", "Definition:Homeomorphism/Topological Spaces", "Totally Disconnected and Locally Connected Space is Discrete", "Definition:Locally Connect...
proofwiki-4556
Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent Function
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\tanh u} = \sech^2 u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\tanh u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\tanh u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = \sech^2 u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\tanh u} = \sech^2 u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\tanh u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\tanh u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r = \sech^2 u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Tangent_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Tangent_Function
[ "Derivatives of Hyperbolic Functions", "Hyperbolic Tangent Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Hyperbolic Tangent" ]
proofwiki-4557
Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cosine and Sine
:$\cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x = 1$ where $\cosh$ and $\sinh$ are hyperbolic cosine and hyperbolic sine.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x | r = \paren {\frac {e^x + e^{-x} } 2}^2 - \paren {\frac {e^x - e^{-x} } 2}^2 | c = {{Defof|Hyperbolic Cosine}} and {{Defof|Hyperbolic Sine}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\frac {\paren {e^x}^2 + 2 \paren {e^x} \paren {e^{-x} } + \paren {e^{-x} }^2} 4} - \paren {\f...
:$\cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x = 1$ where $\cosh$ and $\sinh$ are [[Definition:Hyperbolic Cosine|hyperbolic cosine]] and [[Definition:Hyperbolic Sine|hyperbolic sine]].
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x | r = \paren {\frac {e^x + e^{-x} } 2}^2 - \paren {\frac {e^x - e^{-x} } 2}^2 | c = {{Defof|Hyperbolic Cosine}} and {{Defof|Hyperbolic Sine}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\frac {\paren {e^x}^2 + 2 \paren {e^x} \paren {e^{-x} } + \paren {e^{-x} }^2} 4} - \paren {\f...
Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cosine and Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Squares_of_Hyperbolic_Cosine_and_Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Difference_of_Squares_of_Hyperbolic_Cosine_and_Sine
[ "Difference of Squares of Hyperbolic Cosine and Sine", "Hyperbolic Cosine Function", "Hyperbolic Sine Function" ]
[ "Definition:Hyperbolic Cosine", "Definition:Hyperbolic Sine" ]
[ "Square of Sum", "Exponential of Sum" ]
proofwiki-4558
Derivative of Arccosecant Function
:<nowiki>$\dfrac {\map \d {\arccsc x} } {\d x} = \dfrac {-1} {\size x \sqrt {x^2 - 1} } = \begin {cases} \dfrac {-1} {x \sqrt {x^2 - 1} } & : 0 < \arccsc x < \dfrac \pi 2 \ (\text {that is: $x > 1$}) \\ \dfrac {+1} {x \sqrt {x^2 - 1} } & : -\dfrac \pi 2 < \arccsc x < 0 \ (\text {that is: $x < -1$}) \\ \end{cases}$</no...
{{:Graph of Arccosecant Function}} Let $y = \arccsc x$ where $x < -1$ or $x > 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = y | r = \arccsc x | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | r = \csc y | c = where $y \in \closedint 0 \pi \land y \ne \dfrac pi 2$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\...
:<nowiki>$\dfrac {\map \d {\arccsc x} } {\d x} = \dfrac {-1} {\size x \sqrt {x^2 - 1} } = \begin {cases} \dfrac {-1} {x \sqrt {x^2 - 1} } & : 0 < \arccsc x < \dfrac \pi 2 \ (\text {that is: $x > 1$}) \\ \dfrac {+1} {x \sqrt {x^2 - 1} } & : -\dfrac \pi 2 < \arccsc x < 0 \ (\text {that is: $x < -1$}) \\ \end{cases}$</no...
{{:Graph of Arccosecant Function}} Let $y = \arccsc x$ where $x < -1$ or $x > 1$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = y | r = \arccsc x | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = x | r = \csc y | c = where $y \in \closedint 0 \pi \land y \ne \dfrac pi 2$ }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac ...
Derivative of Arccosecant Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Arccosecant_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Arccosecant_Function
[ "Derivatives of Inverse Trigonometric Functions", "Arccosecant Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Cosecant Function", "Derivative of Inverse Function", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine/Corollary 2", "Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals", "Definition:Inverse Cosecant/Real/Arccosecant" ]
proofwiki-4559
Derivative of Hyperbolic Secant Function
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\sech u} = -\sech u \tanh u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sech u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\sech u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | r = -\sech u \tanh u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = Derivative of Hyperbolic Secant }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\sech u} = -\sech u \tanh u \dfrac {\d u} {\d x}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d x} } {\sech u} | r = \map {\frac \d {\d u} } {\sech u} \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | r = -\sech u \tanh u \frac {\d u} {\d x} | c = [[Derivative of Hyperbolic Secant]] }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Derivative of Hyperbolic Secant Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Secant_Function
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_Hyperbolic_Secant_Function
[ "Derivatives of Hyperbolic Functions", "Hyperbolic Secant Function", "Derivative of Hyperbolic Secant Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Hyperbolic Secant" ]
proofwiki-4560
Power of Sum Modulo Prime
Let $p$ be a prime number. Then: :$\paren {a + b}^p \equiv a^p + b^p \pmod p$
From the Binomial Theorem: :$\ds \paren {a + b}^p = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^p \binom p k a^k b^{p - k}$ Also note that: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^p \binom p k a^k b^{p-k} = a^p + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{p - 1} \binom p k a^k b^{p - k} + b^p$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall k: 0 < k < p | l = \binom p k | ...
Let $p$ be a [[Definition:Prime Number|prime number]]. Then: :$\paren {a + b}^p \equiv a^p + b^p \pmod p$
From the [[Binomial Theorem]]: :$\ds \paren {a + b}^p = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^p \binom p k a^k b^{p - k}$ Also note that: :$\ds \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^p \binom p k a^k b^{p-k} = a^p + \sum_{k \mathop = 1}^{p - 1} \binom p k a^k b^{p - k} + b^p$ So: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall k: 0 < k < p | l = \binom p k ...
Power of Sum Modulo Prime
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Sum_Modulo_Prime
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Sum_Modulo_Prime
[ "Number Theory", "Combinatorics", "Prime Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Prime Number" ]
[ "Binomial Theorem", "Binomial Coefficient of Prime" ]
proofwiki-4561
Volume of Right Circular Cone
The volume $V$ of a right circular cone is given by: :$V = \dfrac 1 3 \pi r^2 h$ where: :$r$ is the radius of the base :$h$ is the height of the cone, that is, the distance between the apex and the center of the base.
This proof utilizes the Method of Disks and thus is dependent on Volume of Right Circular Cylinder. From the Method of Disks, the volume of the cone can be found by the definite integral: :$\ds (1): \quad V = \pi \int_0^{AC} \paren {\map R x}^2 \rd x$ where $\map R x$ is the function describing the line which is to be ...
The [[Definition:Volume|volume]] $V$ of a [[Definition:Right Circular Cone|right circular cone]] is given by: :$V = \dfrac 1 3 \pi r^2 h$ where: :$r$ is the [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] of the [[Definition:Base of Cone|base]] :$h$ is the [[Definition:Height of Cone|height]] of the cone, that is, the [[Defini...
This proof utilizes the [[Method of Disks]] and thus is dependent on [[Volume of Right Circular Cylinder]]. From the [[Method of Disks]], the volume of the cone can be found by the [[Definition:Definite Integral|definite integral]]: :$\ds (1): \quad V = \pi \int_0^{AC} \paren {\map R x}^2 \rd x$ where $\map R x$ is ...
Volume of Right Circular Cone
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Right_Circular_Cone
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Volume_of_Right_Circular_Cone
[ "Right Circular Cones", "Volume Formulas", "Analytic Geometry", "Integral Calculus" ]
[ "Definition:Volume", "Definition:Right Circular Cone", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Cone (Geometry)/Base", "Definition:Cone (Geometry)/Height", "Definition:Linear Measure", "Definition:Cone (Geometry)/Apex", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Cone (Geometry)/Base" ]
[ "Method of Disks", "Volume of Right Circular Cylinder", "Method of Disks", "Definition:Definite Integral", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Solid of Revolution", "Definition:Line/Segment", "Definition:Right Circular Cone/Axis", "Definition:Linear Measure", "Definition:Coordinate System/Orig...
proofwiki-4562
Intersection of Topologies is Topology
Let $\family {\tau_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an arbitrary indexed family of topologies on a set $S$. Then $\tau := \ds \bigcap_{i \mathop \in I} \tau_i$ is also a topology on $S$.
Each of the open set axioms are examined in turn:
Let $\family {\tau_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an arbitrary [[Definition:Indexed Family|indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topology|topologies]] on a [[Definition:Set|set]] $S$. Then $\tau := \ds \bigcap_{i \mathop \in I} \tau_i$ is also a [[Definition:Topology|topology]] on $S$.
Each of the [[Axiom:Open Set Axioms|open set axioms]] are examined in turn:
Intersection of Topologies is Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Topologies_is_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_of_Topologies_is_Topology
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Topology" ]
[ "Axiom:Open Set Axioms" ]
proofwiki-4563
Power Set is Closed under Set Difference
Let $S$ be a set. Let $\powerset S$ be the power set of $S$. Then: :$\forall A, B \in \powerset S: A \setminus B \in \powerset S$ where $A \setminus B$ denotes the set difference of $A$ and $B$.
Let $A, B \in \powerset S$. Then by the definition of power set, $A \subseteq S$ and $B \subseteq S$. We also have $A \setminus B \subseteq A$ from Set Difference is Subset. Thus by Subset Relation is Transitive, $A \setminus B \subseteq S$. Thus $A \setminus B \in \powerset S$, and closure is proved. {{qed}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\powerset S$ be the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $S$. Then: :$\forall A, B \in \powerset S: A \setminus B \in \powerset S$ where $A \setminus B$ denotes the [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]] of $A$ and $B$.
Let $A, B \in \powerset S$. Then by the definition of [[Definition:Power Set|power set]], $A \subseteq S$ and $B \subseteq S$. We also have $A \setminus B \subseteq A$ from [[Set Difference is Subset]]. Thus by [[Subset Relation is Transitive]], $A \setminus B \subseteq S$. Thus $A \setminus B \in \powerset S$, and...
Power Set is Closed under Set Difference
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Set_is_Closed_under_Set_Difference
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_Set_is_Closed_under_Set_Difference
[ "Power Set", "Set Difference" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Set Difference" ]
[ "Definition:Power Set", "Set Difference is Subset", "Subset Relation is Transitive", "Definition:Closure (Abstract Algebra)/Algebraic Structure" ]
proofwiki-4564
Powers of Semigroup Element Commute
Let $\struct {S, \odot}$ be a semigroup. Let $a \in S$. Let $m, n \in \Z_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall m, n \in \Z_{>0}: a^n \odot a^m = a^m \odot a^n$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a^n \odot a^m | r = a^{n + m} | c = Index Laws for Semigroup: Sum of Indices }} {{eqn | r = a^{m + n} | c = Integer Addition is Commutative }} {{eqn | r = a^m \odot a^n | c = Index Laws for Semigroup: Sum of Indices }} {{end-eqn}} {{Qed}}
Let $\struct {S, \odot}$ be a [[Definition:Semigroup|semigroup]]. Let $a \in S$. Let $m, n \in \Z_{>0}$. Then: :$\forall m, n \in \Z_{>0}: a^n \odot a^m = a^m \odot a^n$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a^n \odot a^m | r = a^{n + m} | c = [[Index Laws for Semigroup/Sum of Indices|Index Laws for Semigroup: Sum of Indices]] }} {{eqn | r = a^{m + n} | c = [[Integer Addition is Commutative]] }} {{eqn | r = a^m \odot a^n | c = [[Index Laws for Semigroup/Sum of Indices|Index...
Powers of Semigroup Element Commute
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Semigroup_Element_Commute
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Semigroup_Element_Commute
[ "Semigroups", "Powers (Abstract Algebra)", "Commutativity" ]
[ "Definition:Semigroup" ]
[ "Index Laws/Sum of Indices/Semigroup", "Integer Addition is Commutative", "Index Laws/Sum of Indices/Semigroup" ]
proofwiki-4565
Equivalence of Definitions of Derivative
{{TFAE|def = Derivative of Real Function at Point}} Let $I$ be an open real interval. Let $f: I \to \R$ be a real function defined on $I$. Let $\xi \in I$ be a point in $I$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = f' \left({\xi}\right) | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {f \left({\xi + h}\right) - f \left({\xi}\right)} h | c = }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{x - \xi \mathop \to 0} \frac {f \left({x}\right) - f \left({\xi}\right)} {\xi + h - \xi} | c = substituting $x = \xi + h$ }} {{eqn | r = \l...
{{TFAE|def = Derivative of Real Function at Point}} Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open real interval]]. Let $f: I \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] defined on $I$. Let $\xi \in I$ be a point in $I$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = f' \left({\xi}\right) | r = \lim_{h \mathop \to 0} \frac {f \left({\xi + h}\right) - f \left({\xi}\right)} h | c = }} {{eqn | r = \lim_{x - \xi \mathop \to 0} \frac {f \left({x}\right) - f \left({\xi}\right)} {\xi + h - \xi} | c = substituting $x = \xi + h$ }} {{eqn | r = \l...
Equivalence of Definitions of Derivative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Derivative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Derivative
[ "Differential Calculus", "Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Real Function" ]
[]
proofwiki-4566
Derivative of x to the x
:$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^x = x^x \paren {\ln x + 1}$
Note that the Power Rule cannot be used because the index is not a constant. Let $y := x^x$. As $x$ was stipulated to be positive, we can take the natural logarithm of both sides: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \ln y | r = \ln x^x }} {{eqn | r = x \ln x | c = Laws of Logarithms }} {{eqn | l = \map {\frac \d {\d ...
:$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^x = x^x \paren {\ln x + 1}$
Note that the [[Power Rule for Derivatives|Power Rule]] cannot be used because the index is not a constant. Let $y := x^x$. As $x$ was stipulated to be positive, we can take the [[Definition:Natural Logarithm|natural logarithm]] of both sides: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \ln y | r = \ln x^x }} {{eqn | r = x \ln ...
Derivative of x to the x/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_x_to_the_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_x_to_the_x/Proof_1
[ "Derivative of x to the x", "Derivatives involving Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Power Rule for Derivatives", "Definition:Natural Logarithm", "Laws of Logarithms", "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Natural Logarithm Function", "Product Rule for Derivatives", "Derivative of Identity Function", "Derivative of Natural Logarithm Function" ]
proofwiki-4567
Derivative of x to the x
:$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^x = x^x \paren {\ln x + 1}$
Note that the Power Rule cannot be used because the index is not a constant. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \d {\d x} x^x | r = \frac \d {\d x} \map \exp {x \ln x} | c = {{Defof|Power (Algebra)|subdef = Real Number|index = 1}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\frac \d {\map \d {x \ln x} } \map \exp {x \ln x} } \pare...
:$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^x = x^x \paren {\ln x + 1}$
Note that the [[Power Rule for Derivatives|Power Rule]] cannot be used because the index is not a constant. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \frac \d {\d x} x^x | r = \frac \d {\d x} \map \exp {x \ln x} | c = {{Defof|Power (Algebra)|subdef = Real Number|index = 1}} }} {{eqn | r = \paren {\frac \d {\map \d {x \ln ...
Derivative of x to the x/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_x_to_the_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_x_to_the_x/Proof_2
[ "Derivative of x to the x", "Derivatives involving Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Power Rule for Derivatives", "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Exponential Function", "Product Rule for Derivatives", "Derivative of Identity Function", "Derivative of Natural Logarithm Function", "Real Multiplication Identity is One", "Inverse for Real Multiplication" ]
proofwiki-4568
Derivative of x to the x
:$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^x = x^x \paren {\ln x + 1}$
From Derivative of $x^{a x}$ we have: :$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^{a x} = a x^{a x} \paren {\ln x + 1}$ The result follows on setting $a = 1$. {{qed}}
:$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^x = x^x \paren {\ln x + 1}$
From [[Derivative of x to the a x|Derivative of $x^{a x}$]] we have: :$\dfrac \d {\d x} x^{a x} = a x^{a x} \paren {\ln x + 1}$ The result follows on setting $a = 1$. {{qed}}
Derivative of x to the x/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_x_to_the_x
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Derivative_of_x_to_the_x/Proof_3
[ "Derivative of x to the x", "Derivatives involving Exponential Function" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of x to the a x" ]
proofwiki-4569
Commutativity of Powers in Semigroup
:$\forall m, n \in \N_{>0}: a \circ b = b \circ a \implies a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$ but it is not necessarily the case that: :$\forall m, n \in \N_{>0}: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m \implies a \circ b = b \circ a$
Let $a, b \in S: a \circ b = b \circ a$. Then from Powers of Commuting Elements of Semigroup Commute: :$\forall m, n \in \N_{>0}: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$ {{qed|lemma}} However, consider the dihedral group $D_3$ $= \gen {a, b: a^3 = b^2 = e, b a b = a^{−1} }$. A group is a semigroup. Moreover, the Cancellation La...
:$\forall m, n \in \N_{>0}: a \circ b = b \circ a \implies a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$ but it is not necessarily the case that: :$\forall m, n \in \N_{>0}: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m \implies a \circ b = b \circ a$
Let $a, b \in S: a \circ b = b \circ a$. Then from [[Powers of Commuting Elements of Semigroup Commute]]: :$\forall m, n \in \N_{>0}: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$ {{qed|lemma}} However, consider [[Definition:Dihedral Group D3|the dihedral group $D_3$]] $= \gen {a, b: a^3 = b^2 = e, b a b = a^{−1} }$. A [[Definiti...
Commutativity of Powers in Semigroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Powers_in_Semigroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Powers_in_Semigroup
[ "Semigroups", "Commutativity" ]
[]
[ "Powers of Commuting Elements of Semigroup Commute", "Definition:Dihedral Group D3", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Semigroup", "Cancellation Laws", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Cancellable Element", "Proof by Counterexample", "Category:Semigroups", "Category:Commutativity" ]
proofwiki-4570
Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Semigroup
:$\forall n \in \N_{>1}: \paren {x \circ y}^n = x^n \circ y^n \iff x \circ y = y \circ x$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x \circ y = y \circ x$. Then by Power of Product of Commuting Elements in Semigroup equals Product of Powers: :$\forall n \in \N_{>1}: \paren {x \circ y}^n = x^n \circ y^n$ {{qed|lemma}}
:$\forall n \in \N_{>1}: \paren {x \circ y}^n = x^n \circ y^n \iff x \circ y = y \circ x$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $x \circ y = y \circ x$. Then by [[Power of Product of Commuting Elements in Semigroup equals Product of Powers]]: :$\forall n \in \N_{>1}: \paren {x \circ y}^n = x^n \circ y^n$ {{qed|lemma}}
Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Semigroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Product_of_Commutative_Elements_in_Semigroup
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Product_of_Commutative_Elements_in_Semigroup
[ "Semigroups", "Commutativity", "Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Semigroup" ]
[]
[ "Power of Product of Commuting Elements in Semigroup equals Product of Powers" ]
proofwiki-4571
Sum of Arcsecant and Arccosecant
Let $x \in \R$ be a real number such that $\size x \ge 1$. Then: : $\arcsec x + \arccsc x = \dfrac \pi 2$ where $\arcsec$ and $\arccsc$ denote arcsecant and arccosecant respectively.
Let $y \in \R$ such that: :$\exists x \in \R: \size x \ge 1$ and $x = \map \csc {y + \dfrac \pi 2}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = \map \sec {y + \frac \pi 2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\csc y | c = Secant of Angle plus Right Angle }} {{eqn | r = \map \csc {-y} | c = Cosecant Function is Od...
Let $x \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] such that $\size x \ge 1$. Then: : $\arcsec x + \arccsc x = \dfrac \pi 2$ where $\arcsec$ and $\arccsc$ denote [[Definition:Real Arcsecant|arcsecant]] and [[Definition:Real Arccosecant|arccosecant]] respectively.
Let $y \in \R$ such that: :$\exists x \in \R: \size x \ge 1$ and $x = \map \csc {y + \dfrac \pi 2}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = \map \sec {y + \frac \pi 2} | c = }} {{eqn | r = -\csc y | c = [[Secant of Angle plus Right Angle]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \csc {-y} | c = [[Cosecant Functio...
Sum of Arcsecant and Arccosecant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Arcsecant_and_Arccosecant
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Arcsecant_and_Arccosecant
[ "Arcsecant Function", "Arccosecant Function" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Inverse Secant/Real/Arcsecant", "Definition:Inverse Cosecant/Real/Arccosecant" ]
[ "Secant of Angle plus Right Angle", "Cosecant Function is Odd" ]
proofwiki-4572
Equation of Straight Line Tangent to Circle
Let $\tuple {a, b}$ be the center of a circle $\CC$ whose radius is $r$. Let $P_n = \tuple {x_n, y_n}$ be any point on $\CC$. The equation of a non-vertical tangent line $\TT$ to $\CC$ is given by: :$y - y_n = \dfrac {a - x_n} {y_n - b} \paren {x - x_n}$ The equations of the vertical tangent lines to $\CC$ are: :$x = r...
=== Non-Vertical Tangent Lines === From Equation of Circle, $\CC$ can be described on the $x y$-plane in the form: :$\paren {x - a}^2 + \paren {y - b}^2 = r^2$ where $P = \tuple {a, b}$ is the center of the circle and $r$ is the radius. We use the definition of the derivative as the gradient of the tangent line $\TT$....
Let $\tuple {a, b}$ be the [[Definition:Center of Circle|center]] of a [[Definition:Circle|circle]] $\CC$ whose [[Definition:Radius of Circle|radius]] is $r$. Let $P_n = \tuple {x_n, y_n}$ be any [[Definition:Point|point]] on $\CC$. The equation of a non-vertical [[Definition:Tangent to Circle|tangent line]] $\TT$ t...
=== Non-Vertical Tangent Lines === From [[Equation of Circle]], $\CC$ can be described on the [[Definition:Cartesian Plane|$x y$-plane]] in the form: :$\paren {x - a}^2 + \paren {y - b}^2 = r^2$ where $P = \tuple {a, b}$ is the [[Definition:Center of Circle|center of the circle]] and $r$ is the [[Definition:Radius o...
Equation of Straight Line Tangent to Circle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Straight_Line_Tangent_to_Circle
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equation_of_Straight_Line_Tangent_to_Circle
[ "Analytic Geometry", "Equations of Straight Lines in Plane", "Tangents to Circles", "Circles" ]
[ "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Circle", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Point", "Definition:Tangent Line/Circle", "Definition:Vertical Tangent Line" ]
[ "Equation of Circle", "Definition:Cartesian Plane", "Definition:Circle/Center", "Definition:Circle/Radius", "Definition:Derivative", "Definition:Gradient", "Definition:Tangent Line/Circle", "Definition:Derivative", "Derivative of Constant", "Derivative of Composite Function", "Power Rule for Der...
proofwiki-4573
Index Laws for Monoids/Negative Index
:$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {a^n}^{-1} = a^{-n} = \paren {a^{-1} }^n$
We have $a^0 = e$ so it follows trivially that $a^{-0} = \paren {a^{-1} }^0$. From the general inverse of product, we have: :$\paren {a_1 \circ a_2 \circ \cdots \circ a_n}^{-1} = a_n^{-1} \circ \cdots \circ a_2^{-1} \circ a_1^{-1}$ where $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n \in S$ are all invertible for $\circ$. Hence we have: :$a_1...
:$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {a^n}^{-1} = a^{-n} = \paren {a^{-1} }^n$
We have $a^0 = e$ so it follows trivially that $a^{-0} = \paren {a^{-1} }^0$. From the [[Inverse of Product/Monoid/General Result|general inverse of product]], we have: :$\paren {a_1 \circ a_2 \circ \cdots \circ a_n}^{-1} = a_n^{-1} \circ \cdots \circ a_2^{-1} \circ a_1^{-1}$ where $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n \in S$ are ...
Index Laws for Monoids/Negative Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_Laws_for_Monoids/Negative_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_Laws_for_Monoids/Negative_Index
[ "Monoids", "Index Laws" ]
[]
[ "Inverse of Product/Monoid/General Result", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Definition:Invertible Element" ]
proofwiki-4574
Infinite Limit Theorem
Let $f$ be a real function of $x$ of the form :$\map f x = \dfrac {\map g x} {\map h x}$ Further, let $g$ and $h$ be continuous on some open interval $\mathbb I$, where $c$ is a constant in $\mathbb I$. If: :$(1): \quad \map g c \ne 0$ :$(2): \quad \map h c = 0$ :$(3): \quad \forall x \in \mathbb I: x \ne c \implies \...
To prove the claim, it will suffice to show that for each $N \in \R_{>0}$, one can find an $\epsilon > 0$ such that: :$\size {x - c} < \epsilon \implies \size {\map f x} \ge N$ So fix $N \in \R_{>0}$. First, by continuity of $g$, find an $\epsilon_1 > 0$ such that: :$\size {x - c} < \epsilon_1 \implies \size {\map g x ...
Let $f$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]] of $x$ of the form :$\map f x = \dfrac {\map g x} {\map h x}$ Further, let $g$ and $h$ be [[Definition:Continuous on Interval|continuous]] on some [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval]] $\mathbb I$, where $c$ is a constant in $\mathbb I$. If: :$(1): ...
To prove the claim, it will suffice to show that for each $N \in \R_{>0}$, one can find an $\epsilon > 0$ such that: :$\size {x - c} < \epsilon \implies \size {\map f x} \ge N$ So fix $N \in \R_{>0}$. First, by [[Definition:Continuous on Interval|continuity]] of $g$, find an $\epsilon_1 > 0$ such that: :$\size {x ...
Infinite Limit Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Infinite_Limit_Theorem
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Infinite_Limit_Theorem
[ "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Interval", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Limit of Real Function" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Interval", "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Interval", "Ordering of Reciprocals" ]
proofwiki-4575
Index Laws for Monoids/Product of Indices
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: a^{n m} = \paren {a^m}^n = \paren {a^n}^m$
Let $m \in \N, c = a^m, d = \paren {a^{-1}}^m$. We define the mapping $g_c: \Z \to S$ as: :$\forall n \in \Z: \map {g_c} n = \map {\circ^n} c$ as defined in the proof of the Index Law for Sum of Indices. Let $h: \Z \to \Z$ be the mapping defined as: :$\forall z \in \Z: \map h z = z m$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = a^...
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: a^{n m} = \paren {a^m}^n = \paren {a^n}^m$
Let $m \in \N, c = a^m, d = \paren {a^{-1}}^m$. We define the [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] $g_c: \Z \to S$ as: :$\forall n \in \Z: \map {g_c} n = \map {\circ^n} c$ as defined in the proof of the [[Index Laws for Monoids/Sum of Indices|Index Law for Sum of Indices]]. Let $h: \Z \to \Z$ be the [[Definition:Mapping|m...
Index Laws for Monoids/Product of Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_Laws_for_Monoids/Product_of_Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Index_Laws_for_Monoids/Product_of_Indices
[ "Monoids", "Index Laws" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Index Laws for Monoids/Sum of Indices", "Definition:Mapping", "Index Laws for Monoids/Sum of Indices", "Index Laws/Product of Indices/Semigroup", "Definition:Homomorphism (Abstract Algebra)", "Extension Theorem for Homomorphisms" ]
proofwiki-4576
Powers of Group Elements/Negative Index
:$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {g^n}^{-1} = g^{-n} = \paren {g^{-1} }^n$
All elements of a group are invertible, so we can directly use the result from Index Laws for Monoids: Sum of Indices: :$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {g^n}^{-1} = g^{-n} = \paren {g^{-1} }^n$ {{qed}}
:$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {g^n}^{-1} = g^{-n} = \paren {g^{-1} }^n$
All elements of a [[Definition:Group|group]] are [[Definition:Invertible Element|invertible]], so we can directly use the result from [[Index Laws for Monoids/Sum of Indices|Index Laws for Monoids: Sum of Indices]]: :$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {g^n}^{-1} = g^{-n} = \paren {g^{-1} }^n$ {{qed}}
Powers of Group Elements/Negative Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Group_Elements/Negative_Index
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Group_Elements/Negative_Index
[ "Group Theory", "Index Laws" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Index Laws for Monoids/Sum of Indices" ]
proofwiki-4577
Powers of Group Elements/Sum of Indices
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: g^m \circ g^n = g^{m + n}$
All elements of a group are invertible, so we can directly use the result from Index Laws for Monoids: Sum of Indices: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: g^m \circ g^n = g^{m + n}$ {{qed}}
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: g^m \circ g^n = g^{m + n}$
All elements of a [[Definition:Group|group]] are [[Definition:Invertible Element|invertible]], so we can directly use the result from [[Index Laws for Monoids/Sum of Indices|Index Laws for Monoids: Sum of Indices]]: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: g^m \circ g^n = g^{m + n}$ {{qed}}
Powers of Group Elements/Sum of Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Group_Elements/Sum_of_Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Group_Elements/Sum_of_Indices
[ "Group Theory", "Powers (Abstract Algebra)", "Index Laws" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Index Laws for Monoids/Sum of Indices" ]
proofwiki-4578
Powers of Group Elements/Product of Indices
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: \paren {g^m}^n = g^{m n} = \paren {g^n}^m$
All elements of a group are invertible, so we can directly use the result from Index Laws for Monoids: Product of Indices: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: g^{m n} = \paren {g^m}^n = \paren {g^n}^m$ {{qed}}
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: \paren {g^m}^n = g^{m n} = \paren {g^n}^m$
All elements of a [[Definition:Group|group]] are [[Definition:Invertible Element|invertible]], so we can directly use the result from [[Index Laws for Monoids/Product of Indices|Index Laws for Monoids: Product of Indices]]: :$\forall m, n \in \Z: g^{m n} = \paren {g^m}^n = \paren {g^n}^m$ {{qed}}
Powers of Group Elements/Product of Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Group_Elements/Product_of_Indices
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Powers_of_Group_Elements/Product_of_Indices
[ "Group Theory", "Powers (Abstract Algebra)", "Index Laws" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Index Laws for Monoids/Product of Indices" ]
proofwiki-4579
Group Element Commutes with Inverse
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a group whose identity is $e$. Let $x \in G$. Then: :$x \circ x^{-1} = x^{-1} \circ x$ That is, $x$ commutes with its inverse $x^{-1}$.
By definition of inverse element: :$x \circ x^{-1} = e = x^{-1} \circ x$ Hence the result by definition.
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a [[Definition:Group|group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] is $e$. Let $x \in G$. Then: :$x \circ x^{-1} = x^{-1} \circ x$ That is, $x$ [[Definition:Commute|commutes]] with its [[Definition:Inverse Element|inverse]] $x^{-1}$.
By definition of [[Definition:Inverse Element|inverse element]]: :$x \circ x^{-1} = e = x^{-1} \circ x$ Hence the result by definition.
Group Element Commutes with Inverse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_Element_Commutes_with_Inverse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Group_Element_Commutes_with_Inverse
[ "Group Theory", "Commutativity" ]
[ "Definition:Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Commutative/Elements", "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Inverse" ]
[ "Definition:Inverse (Abstract Algebra)/Inverse" ]
proofwiki-4580
Commutativity of Powers in Monoid
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$
By Powers of Commuting Elements of Semigroup Commute, if $m > 0$ and $n > 0$ then $a^m$ commutes with $b^n$. By Commutation with Inverse in Monoid, again if $m > 0$ and $n > 0$ then $a^m$ commutes with $\paren {b^n}^{-1} = b^{-n}$. Similarly $b^n$ commutes with $a^{-m}$. But as $a^{-m}$ commutes with $b^n$, it also com...
:$\forall m, n \in \Z: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$
By [[Powers of Commuting Elements of Semigroup Commute]], if $m > 0$ and $n > 0$ then $a^m$ [[Definition:Commute|commutes]] with $b^n$. By [[Commutation with Inverse in Monoid]], again if $m > 0$ and $n > 0$ then $a^m$ [[Definition:Commute|commutes]] with $\paren {b^n}^{-1} = b^{-n}$. Similarly $b^n$ [[Definition:Com...
Commutativity of Powers in Monoid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Powers_in_Monoid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Powers_in_Monoid
[ "Monoids", "Commutativity" ]
[]
[ "Powers of Commuting Elements of Semigroup Commute", "Definition:Commutative/Elements", "Commutation with Inverse in Monoid", "Definition:Commutative/Elements", "Definition:Commutative/Elements", "Definition:Commutative/Elements", "Definition:Commutative/Elements", "Commutation with Inverse in Monoid"...
proofwiki-4581
Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Monoid
:$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {a \circ b}^n = a^n \circ b^n$
From Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Semigroup, this result holds if $n \ge 0$. Since $a$ and $b$ commute, then so do $a^{-1}$ and $b^{-1}$ by Commutation of Inverses in Monoid. Hence, if $n > 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {a \circ b}^{-n} | r = \paren {\paren {a \circ b}^{-1} }^n }} {{eqn | r ...
:$\forall n \in \Z: \paren {a \circ b}^n = a^n \circ b^n$
From [[Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Semigroup]], this result holds if $n \ge 0$. Since $a$ and $b$ [[Definition:Commute|commute]], then so do $a^{-1}$ and $b^{-1}$ by [[Commutation of Inverses in Monoid]]. Hence, if $n > 0$: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {a \circ b}^{-n} | r = \paren {\paren ...
Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Monoid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Product_of_Commutative_Elements_in_Monoid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Product_of_Commutative_Elements_in_Monoid
[ "Monoids", "Commutativity" ]
[]
[ "Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Semigroup", "Definition:Commutative/Elements", "Commutation of Inverses in Monoid", "Inverse of Product", "Commutation of Inverses in Monoid" ]
proofwiki-4582
Commutativity of Powers in Group
: $\forall m, n \in \Z: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$
By definition, all elements of a group are invertible. Therefore Commutativity of Powers in Monoid can be applied directly. {{Qed}} Category:Group Theory Category:Commutativity s8ogf503onvplgoz7ir9lu0b4wljf2f
: $\forall m, n \in \Z: a^m \circ b^n = b^n \circ a^m$
By definition, all [[Definition:Element|elements]] of a [[Definition:Group|group]] are [[Definition:Invertible Element|invertible]]. Therefore [[Commutativity of Powers in Monoid]] can be applied directly. {{Qed}} [[Category:Group Theory]] [[Category:Commutativity]] s8ogf503onvplgoz7ir9lu0b4wljf2f
Commutativity of Powers in Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Powers_in_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Commutativity_of_Powers_in_Group
[ "Group Theory", "Commutativity" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Element", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Commutativity of Powers in Monoid", "Category:Group Theory", "Category:Commutativity" ]
proofwiki-4583
Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Group
:$a \circ b = b \circ a \iff \forall n \in \Z: \paren {a \circ b}^n = a^n \circ b^n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $a \circ b = b \circ a$. By definition, all elements of a group are invertible. Therefore the results in Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Monoid can be applied directly. {{qed|lemma}}
:$a \circ b = b \circ a \iff \forall n \in \Z: \paren {a \circ b}^n = a^n \circ b^n$
=== Necessary Condition === Let $a \circ b = b \circ a$. By definition, all [[Definition:Element|elements]] of a [[Definition:Group|group]] are [[Definition:Invertible Element|invertible]]. Therefore the results in [[Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Monoid]] can be applied directly. {{qed|lemma}}
Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Product_of_Commutative_Elements_in_Group
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Power_of_Product_of_Commutative_Elements_in_Group
[ "Group Theory", "Commutativity" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Element", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Invertible Element", "Power of Product of Commutative Elements in Monoid" ]
proofwiki-4584
Primitive of Tangent Function/Cosine Form
:$\ds \int \tan x \rd x = -\ln \size {\cos x} + C$ where $\cos x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \tan x \rd x | r = \int \frac {\sin x} {\cos x} \rd x | c = {{Defof|Real Tangent Function}} }} {{eqn | r = -\int \frac {-\sin x} {\cos x} \rd x | c = Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function }} {{eqn | r = -\int \frac {\paren {\cos x}'} {\cos x} \rd x | c = Deriv...
:$\ds \int \tan x \rd x = -\ln \size {\cos x} + C$ where $\cos x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \tan x \rd x | r = \int \frac {\sin x} {\cos x} \rd x | c = {{Defof|Real Tangent Function}} }} {{eqn | r = -\int \frac {-\sin x} {\cos x} \rd x | c = [[Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function]] }} {{eqn | r = -\int \frac {\paren {\cos x}'} {\cos x} \rd x | c = [...
Primitive of Tangent Function/Cosine Form/Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Tangent_Function/Cosine_Form
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Tangent_Function/Cosine_Form/Proof
[ "Primitive of Tangent Function" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Constant Multiple of Function", "Derivative of Cosine Function", "Primitive of Function under its Derivative" ]
proofwiki-4585
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\arctan x} | r = \dfrac 1 {1 + x^2} | c = Derivative of Arctangent Function }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \dfrac {\d x} {1 + x^2} | r = \arctan x + C | c = {{Defof|Primitive (Calculus)}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\arctan x} | r = \dfrac 1 {1 + x^2} | c = [[Derivative of Arctangent Function]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \dfrac {\d x} {1 + x^2} | r = \arctan x + C | c = {{Defof|Primitive (Calculus)}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Primitive of Reciprocal of 1 plus x squared/Arctangent Form/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_1_plus_x_squared/Arctangent_Form/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Arctangent Function" ]
proofwiki-4586
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
From Primitive of $\dfrac {x^m} {\ln x}$: :$\ds \int \frac {x^m \rd x} {\ln x} = \map \ln {\ln x} + \paren {m + 1} \ln x + \sum_{k \mathop \ge 2}^n \frac {\paren {m + 1}^k \paren {\ln x}^k} {k \times k!} + C$ The result follows by setting $m = 0$. {{qed}}
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
From [[Primitive of Power of x over Logarithm of x|Primitive of $\dfrac {x^m} {\ln x}$]]: :$\ds \int \frac {x^m \rd x} {\ln x} = \map \ln {\ln x} + \paren {m + 1} \ln x + \sum_{k \mathop \ge 2}^n \frac {\paren {m + 1}^k \paren {\ln x}^k} {k \times k!} + C$ The result follows by setting $m = 0$. {{qed}}
Primitive of Reciprocal of Logarithm of x/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Logarithm_of_x/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Power of x over Logarithm of x" ]
proofwiki-4587
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
From Primitive of $\dfrac {1 + x^2} {1 + x^4}$, we have: :$\ds \int \frac {x^2 + 1} {x^4 + 1} \rd x = \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} \map \arctan {\frac 1 {\sqrt 2} \paren {x - \frac 1 x} } + C$ From Primitive of $\dfrac {-1 + x^2} {1 + x^4}$, we have: :$\ds \int \frac {x^2 - 1} {x^4 + 1} \rd x = \frac 1 {2 \sqrt 2} \ln \size {\fra...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
From [[Primitive of One plus x Squared over One plus Fourth Power of x|Primitive of $\dfrac {1 + x^2} {1 + x^4}$]], we have: :$\ds \int \frac {x^2 + 1} {x^4 + 1} \rd x = \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} \map \arctan {\frac 1 {\sqrt 2} \paren {x - \frac 1 x} } + C$ From [[Primitive of Minus One plus x Squared over One plus Fourth Po...
Primitive of Reciprocal of One plus Fourth Power of x/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_One_plus_Fourth_Power_of_x/Proof_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of One plus x Squared over One plus Fourth Power of x", "Primitive of Minus One plus x Squared over One plus Fourth Power of x", "Logarithm of Reciprocal" ]
proofwiki-4588
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
A special case of Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {x^4 + a^4}$, setting $a = 1$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {x^4 + a^4} | r = \frac 1 {4 a^3 \sqrt 2} \map \ln {\frac {x^2 + a x \sqrt 2 + a^2} {x^2 - a x \sqrt 2 + a^2} } - \frac 1 {2 a^3 \sqrt 2} \paren {\map \arctan {1 - \frac {x \sqrt 2} a} - \map \arcta...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
A special case of [[Primitive of Reciprocal of x fourth plus a fourth|Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {x^4 + a^4}$]], setting $a = 1$. {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {x^4 + a^4} | r = \frac 1 {4 a^3 \sqrt 2} \map \ln {\frac {x^2 + a x \sqrt 2 + a^2} {x^2 - a x \sqrt 2 + a^2} } - \frac 1 {2 a^3 \sqrt 2} \pare...
Primitive of Reciprocal of One plus Fourth Power of x/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_One_plus_Fourth_Power_of_x/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of x fourth plus a fourth", "Difference of Arctangents", "Difference of Two Squares", "Inverse Tangent is Odd Function", "Sum of Arctangent and Arccotangent", "Inverse Tangent is Odd Function" ]
proofwiki-4589
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
From Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {\sqrt {a^2 - x^2} }$: Arcsine Form: :$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {a^2 - x^2} } = \arcsin \frac x a + C$ The result follows by setting $a = 1$. {{Qed}}
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
From [[Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of a squared minus x squared/Arcsine Form|Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {\sqrt {a^2 - x^2} }$: Arcsine Form]]: :$\ds \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {a^2 - x^2} } = \arcsin \frac x a + C$ The result follows by setting $a = 1$. {{Qed}}
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of 1 minus x squared/Arcsine Form/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_1_minus_x_squared/Arcsine_Form/Proof_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of a squared minus x squared/Arcsine Form" ]
proofwiki-4590
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\arcsin x} | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x^2} } | c = Derivative of Arcsine Function }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {1 - x^2} } | r = \arcsin x + C | c = {{Defof|Primitive (Calculus)}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \map {\dfrac \d {\d x} } {\arcsin x} | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt {1 - x^2} } | c = [[Derivative of Arcsine Function]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {1 - x^2} } | r = \arcsin x + C | c = {{Defof|Primitive (Calculus)}} }} {{end-eqn}} {{qed}}
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of 1 minus x squared/Arcsine Form/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_1_minus_x_squared/Arcsine_Form/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Arcsine Function" ]
proofwiki-4591
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
Let: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = a \cos^2 \theta + b \sin^2 \theta | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \dfrac {\d x} {\d \theta} | r = 2 a \cos \theta \paren {-\sin \theta} + 2 b \sin \theta \cos \theta | c = Chain Rule for Derivatives, Derivative of Cosine Function, Derivative of S...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
Let: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = a \cos^2 \theta + b \sin^2 \theta | c = }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \dfrac {\d x} {\d \theta} | r = 2 a \cos \theta \paren {-\sin \theta} + 2 b \sin \theta \cos \theta | c = [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]], [[Derivative of Cosine Function]], [[Deri...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of a minus x by Cube of Root of x minus b/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_a_minus_x_by_Cube_of_Root_of_x_minus_b/Proof_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Composite Function", "Derivative of Cosine Function", "Derivative of Sine Function", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine", "Primitive of Square of Secant Function" ]
proofwiki-4592
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
First let us express the integrand in the following form: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {\paren {a x + b} \paren {p x + q} } } | r = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {a p \paren {x - \paren {-\frac b a} } \paren {x - \paren {-\frac q p} } } } | c = }} {{end-eqn}} Recall the defin...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
First let us express the [[Definition:Integrand|integrand]] in the following form: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | n = 1 | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {\paren {a x + b} \paren {p x + q} } } | r = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {a p \paren {x - \paren {-\frac b a} } \paren {x - \paren {-\frac q p} } } } | c = }} {{...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of a x + b by Root of p x + q/a p less than 0/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_a_x_+_b_by_Root_of_p_x_+_q/a_p_less_than_0/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Integration/Integrand", "Definition:Euler Substitution/Third", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Integration by Substitution", "Primitive of Reciprocal of x squared plus a squared/Arctangent Form", "Arccotangent of Reciprocal equals Arctangent", "Sum of A...
proofwiki-4593
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {2 + 4 x - 3 x^2} } | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 3} \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {\frac 2 3 + \frac 4 3 x - x^2} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 3} \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {\frac {10} 9 - \paren {x - \frac 2 3}^2} } | c = Completing the Square }} {{e...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {2 + 4 x - 3 x^2} } | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 3} \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {\frac 2 3 + \frac 4 3 x - x^2} } | c = }} {{eqn | r = \dfrac 1 {\sqrt 3} \int \dfrac {\d x} {\sqrt {\frac {10} 9 - \paren {x - \frac 2 3}^2} } | c = [[Completing the Square]] }}...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of a x squared plus b x plus c/Examples/2 + 4 x - 3 x^2/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_a_x_squared_plus_b_x_plus_c/Examples/2_+_4_x_-_3_x^2/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Completing the Square", "Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of a squared minus x squared/Arcsine Form" ]
proofwiki-4594
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {x^2 - a^2} } | r = \cosh^{-1} {\frac x a} + C' | c = Primitive of Reciprocal of $\sqrt {x^2 - a^2}$: $\cosh^{-1}$ form }} {{eqn | r = \map \ln {\frac x a + \sqrt {\paren {\frac x a}^2 - 1} } + C' | c = {{Defof|Real Inverse Hyperbolic Cosine}} }} {{eq...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {x^2 - a^2} } | r = \cosh^{-1} {\frac x a} + C' | c = [[Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared minus a squared/Inverse Hyperbolic Cosine Form|Primitive of Reciprocal of $\sqrt {x^2 - a^2}$: $\cosh^{-1}$ form]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \ln {\frac x a + \sqr...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared minus a squared/Logarithm Form/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_x_squared_minus_a_squared/Logarithm_Form/Proof_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared minus a squared/Inverse Hyperbolic Cosine Form", "Difference of Logarithms" ]
proofwiki-4595
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = a \tan \theta }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d x} {\d \theta} | r = a \sec^2 \theta | c = Derivative of Tangent Function }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\paren {\sqrt {x^2 + a^2} }^3} | r = \int \frac {a \sec^2 \theta \rd \the...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = x | r = a \tan \theta }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d x} {\d \theta} | r = a \sec^2 \theta | c = [[Derivative of Tangent Function]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\paren {\sqrt {x^2 + a^2} }^3} | r = \int \frac {a \sec^2 \theta \rd ...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared plus a squared cubed/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_x_squared_plus_a_squared_cubed/Proof_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Derivative of Tangent Function", "Integration by Substitution", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine/Corollary 1", "Primitive of Cosine Function", "Tangent is Sine divided by Cosine", "Sum of Squares of Sine and Cosine/Corollary 1" ]
proofwiki-4596
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {x^2 + a^2} } | r = \arsinh {\frac x a} + C | c = Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {\sqrt {x^2 + a^2} }$ in $\arsinh$ form }} {{eqn | r = \map \ln {x + \sqrt {x^2 + a^2} } - \ln a + C | c = $\arsinh \dfrac x a$ in Logarithm Form }} {{eqn | r = \map \ln {x + \sq...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {x^2 + a^2} } | r = \arsinh {\frac x a} + C | c = [[Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared plus a squared/Inverse Hyperbolic Sine Form|Primitive of $\dfrac 1 {\sqrt {x^2 + a^2} }$ in $\arsinh$ form]] }} {{eqn | r = \map \ln {x + \sqrt {x^2 + a^2} } - ...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared plus a squared/Logarithm Form/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_x_squared_plus_a_squared/Logarithm_Form/Proof_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared plus a squared/Inverse Hyperbolic Sine Form", "Real Area Hyperbolic Sine of x over a in Logarithm Form", "Definition:Primitive (Calculus)/Constant of Integration" ]
proofwiki-4597
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
Let $y^2 = a^2 + x^2$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 y \frac {\d y} {\d x} | r = 2 x | c = Power Rule for Derivatives, Chain Rule for Derivatives }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = y \frac {\d y} {\d x} | r = x | c = simplification }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d y} x | ...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
Let $y^2 = a^2 + x^2$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = 2 y \frac {\d y} {\d x} | r = 2 x | c = [[Power Rule for Derivatives]], [[Chain Rule for Derivatives]] }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = y \frac {\d y} {\d x} | r = x | c = simplification }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \frac {\d y} ...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Root of x squared plus a squared/Logarithm Form/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Root_of_x_squared_plus_a_squared/Logarithm_Form/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Power Rule for Derivatives", "Derivative of Composite Function", "Primitive of Function under its Derivative" ]
proofwiki-4598
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sin a x + \cos a x} | r = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt 2 \map \cos {a x - \dfrac \pi 4} } | c = Sine of x plus Cosine of x: Cosine Form }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} \int \map \sec {a x - \dfrac \pi 4} \rd x | c = Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine }} {{end-eqn...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sin a x + \cos a x} | r = \int \frac {\d x} {\sqrt 2 \map \cos {a x - \dfrac \pi 4} } | c = [[Sine of x plus Cosine of x/Cosine Form|Sine of x plus Cosine of x: Cosine Form]] }} {{eqn | r = \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} \int \map \sec {a x - \dfrac \pi 4} \rd x | c = ...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Sine of a x plus Cosine of a x/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Sine_of_a_x_plus_Cosine_of_a_x/Proof_1
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Sine of x plus Cosine of x/Cosine Form", "Secant is Reciprocal of Cosine", "Derivative of Identity Function", "Derivatives of Function of a x + b", "Integration by Substitution", "Primitive of Secant of a x/Tangent Form" ]
proofwiki-4599
Primitive of Reciprocal
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sin a x + \cos a x} | r = \frac 1 a \int \frac {\dfrac {2 \rd u} {1 + u^2} } {\dfrac {2 u} {1 + u^2} + \dfrac {1 - u^2} {1 + u^2} } | c = Weierstrass Substitution: $u = \tan \dfrac {a x} 2$ }} {{eqn | r = \frac 2 a \int \frac {\d u} {- u^2 + 2 u + 1} | c =...
:$\ds \int \frac {\d x} x = \ln \size x + C$ for $x \ne 0$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \int \frac {\d x} {\sin a x + \cos a x} | r = \frac 1 a \int \frac {\dfrac {2 \rd u} {1 + u^2} } {\dfrac {2 u} {1 + u^2} + \dfrac {1 - u^2} {1 + u^2} } | c = [[Weierstrass Substitution]]: $u = \tan \dfrac {a x} 2$ }} {{eqn | r = \frac 2 a \int \frac {\d u} {- u^2 + 2 u + 1} |...
Primitive of Reciprocal of Sine of a x plus Cosine of a x/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Primitive_of_Reciprocal_of_Sine_of_a_x_plus_Cosine_of_a_x/Proof_2
[ "Primitive of Reciprocal", "Primitives involving Reciprocals", "Logarithms", "Reciprocals" ]
[]
[ "Weierstrass Substitution", "Primitive of Reciprocal of a x squared plus b x plus c", "Tangent of 22.5 Degrees", "Tangent of 67.5 Degrees" ]