id
stringlengths
11
15
title
stringlengths
7
171
problem
stringlengths
9
4.33k
solution
stringlengths
6
19k
problem_wikitext
stringlengths
9
4.42k
solution_wikitext
stringlengths
7
19.1k
proof_title
stringlengths
9
171
theorem_url
stringlengths
34
198
proof_url
stringlengths
36
198
categories
listlengths
0
9
theorem_references
listlengths
0
36
proof_references
listlengths
0
253
proofwiki-6200
Pointwise Addition on Rational-Valued Functions is Associative
Let $f, g, h: S \to \Q$ be rational-valued functions. Let $f + g: S \to \Q$ denote the pointwise sum of $f$ and $g$. Then: :$\paren {f + g} + h = f + \paren {g + h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f + g} + h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x + \map g x} + \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Addition of Rational-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x + \paren {\map g x + \map h x} | c = Rational Addition is Associative }} {{e...
Let $f, g, h: S \to \Q$ be [[Definition:Rational-Valued Function|rational-valued functions]]. Let $f + g: S \to \Q$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Addition of Rational-Valued Functions|pointwise sum of $f$ and $g$]]. Then: :$\paren {f + g} + h = f + \paren {g + h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f + g} + h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x + \map g x} + \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Addition of Rational-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x + \paren {\map g x + \map h x} | c = [[Rational Addition is Associative]] }}...
Pointwise Addition on Rational-Valued Functions is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Addition_on_Rational-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Addition_on_Rational-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
[ "Pointwise Addition is Associative", "Rational Addition" ]
[ "Definition:Rational-Valued Function", "Definition:Pointwise Addition of Rational-Valued Functions" ]
[ "Rational Addition is Associative", "Category:Pointwise Addition is Associative", "Category:Rational Addition" ]
proofwiki-6201
Pointwise Multiplication on Integer-Valued Functions is Associative
Let $f, g, h: S \to \Z$ be integer-valued functions. Let $f \times g: S \to \Z$ denote the pointwise product of $f$ and $g$. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = Inte...
Let $f, g, h: S \to \Z$ be [[Definition:Integer-Valued Function|integer-valued functions]]. Let $f \times g: S \to \Z$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions|pointwise product of $f$ and $g$]]. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = [[In...
Pointwise Multiplication on Integer-Valued Functions is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Integer-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Integer-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
[ "Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Integer Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Integer-Valued Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Integer-Valued Functions" ]
[ "Integer Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Integer Multiplication" ]
proofwiki-6202
Pointwise Multiplication on Complex-Valued Functions is Associative
Let $f, g, h: S \to \C$ be complex-valued functions. Let $f \times g: S \to \C$ denote the pointwise product of $f$ and $g$. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h c | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Complex-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = Comp...
Let $f, g, h: S \to \C$ be [[Definition:Complex-Valued Function|complex-valued functions]]. Let $f \times g: S \to \C$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Complex-Valued Functions|pointwise product of $f$ and $g$]]. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h c | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Complex-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = [[Co...
Pointwise Multiplication on Complex-Valued Functions is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Complex-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Complex-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
[ "Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Complex Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Complex-Valued Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Complex-Valued Functions" ]
[ "Complex Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Complex Multiplication" ]
proofwiki-6203
Pointwise Multiplication on Real-Valued Functions is Associative
Let $f, g, h: S \to \R$ be real-valued functions. Let $f \times g: S \to \R$ denote the pointwise product of $f$ and $g$. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = Real Mu...
Let $f, g, h: S \to \R$ be [[Definition:Real-Valued Function|real-valued functions]]. Let $f \times g: S \to \R$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions|pointwise product of $f$ and $g$]]. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = [[Real ...
Pointwise Multiplication on Real-Valued Functions is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Real-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Real-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
[ "Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Real Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Real-Valued Functions" ]
[ "Real Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Real Multiplication" ]
proofwiki-6204
Pointwise Multiplication on Rational-Valued Functions is Associative
Let $f, g, h: S \to \Q$ be rational-valued functions. Let $f \times g: S \to \Q$ denote the pointwise product of $f$ and $g$. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Rational-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = Rat...
Let $f, g, h: S \to \Q$ be [[Definition:Rational-Valued Function|rational-valued functions]]. Let $f \times g: S \to \Q$ denote the [[Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Rational-Valued Functions|pointwise product of $f$ and $g$]]. Then: :$\paren {f \times g} \times h = f \times \paren {g \times h}$
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | q = \forall x \in S | l = \map {\paren {\paren {f \times g} \times h} } x | r = \paren {\map f x \times \map g x} \times \map h x | c = {{Defof|Pointwise Multiplication of Rational-Valued Functions}} }} {{eqn | r = \map f x \times \paren {\map g x \times \map h x} | c = [[R...
Pointwise Multiplication on Rational-Valued Functions is Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Rational-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Pointwise_Multiplication_on_Rational-Valued_Functions_is_Associative
[ "Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Rational Multiplication" ]
[ "Definition:Rational-Valued Function", "Definition:Pointwise Multiplication of Rational-Valued Functions" ]
[ "Rational Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Pointwise Multiplication is Associative", "Category:Rational Multiplication" ]
proofwiki-6205
Set Equation: Union
Let $A$ and $B$ be sets. Consider the set equation: :$A \cup X = B$ The solution set of this is given by: :$X = \begin {cases} \O & : A \nsubseteq B \\ \set {\paren {B \setminus A} \cup Y: Y \subseteq A} & : \text {otherwise} \end {cases}$
In the first case $A$ is a not a subset of $B$. So there exists an $x \in A$ such that $x \notin B$. By the definition of union: :$\forall x: x \in A \implies x \in A \cup X$ Hence the solution set is empty. In the second case, suppose $A$ is a subset of $B$. {{WIP}} In particular, suppose $A$ is a subset of $B$, and $...
Let $A$ and $B$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Consider the [[Definition:Set Equation|set equation]]: :$A \cup X = B$ The solution set of this is given by: :$X = \begin {cases} \O & : A \nsubseteq B \\ \set {\paren {B \setminus A} \cup Y: Y \subseteq A} & : \text {otherwise} \end {cases}$
In the first case $A$ is a not a subset of $B$. So there exists an $x \in A$ such that $x \notin B$. By the definition of [[Definition:Set Union|union]]: :$\forall x: x \in A \implies x \in A \cup X$ Hence the solution set is [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]. In the second case, suppose $A$ is a subset of $B$. {...
Set Equation: Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equation:_Union
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equation:_Union
[ "Set Theory", "Set Union" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Equation" ]
[ "Definition:Set Union", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Empty Set", "Subset of Empty Set", "Union of Empty Set", "Empty Set is Subset of All Sets", "Definition:Subset", "Proof by Contraposition", "Set is Subset of Itself", "Definition:Existential Quantifier", "Definition:Set Union", "Set i...
proofwiki-6206
Set Equation: Intersection
Let $A$ and $B$ be sets. Consider the set equation: :$A \cap X = B$ The solution set of this is: :$\O$ if $B \nsubseteq A$ :$\set {B \cup Y: A \nsubseteq Y}$ otherwise.
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Set Theory Category:Set Intersection p9k3ot62zxrq1wcpmbaq5deehrvs41t
Let $A$ and $B$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Consider the [[Definition:Set Equation|set equation]]: :$A \cap X = B$ The solution set of this is: :$\O$ if $B \nsubseteq A$ :$\set {B \cup Y: A \nsubseteq Y}$ otherwise.
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Set Theory]] [[Category:Set Intersection]] p9k3ot62zxrq1wcpmbaq5deehrvs41t
Set Equation: Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equation:_Intersection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_Equation:_Intersection
[ "Set Theory", "Set Intersection" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Set Equation" ]
[ "Category:Set Theory", "Category:Set Intersection" ]
proofwiki-6207
Non-Abelian Group has Order Greater than 4
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a non-abelian group. Then the order of $\struct {G, \circ}$ is greater than $4$.
Let $\left({G, \circ}\right)$ be a non-abelian group whose identity is $e$. For a group $\left({G, \circ}\right)$ to be non-abelian, we require: : $\exists x, y \in G: x \circ y \ne y \circ x$ Suppose $x \circ y \in \left\{ {x, y, e}\right\}$. : $x \circ y = e \implies y \circ x = e$ and $\left({G, \circ}\right)$ is ab...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian group]]. Then the [[Definition:Order of Structure|order]] of $\struct {G, \circ}$ is greater than $4$.
Let $\left({G, \circ}\right)$ be a non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian group]] whose [[Definition:Identity Element|identity]] is $e$. For a group $\left({G, \circ}\right)$ to be non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian]], we require: : $\exists x, y \in G: x \circ y \ne y \circ x$ Suppose $x \circ y \in \left\{ {x, ...
Non-Abelian Group has Order Greater than 4/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Group_has_Order_Greater_than_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Group_has_Order_Greater_than_4/Proof_1
[ "Abelian Groups", "Non-Abelian Group has Order Greater than 4" ]
[ "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Order of Structure" ]
[ "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Identity (Abstract Algebra)/Two-Sided Identity", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Element" ]
proofwiki-6208
Non-Abelian Group has Order Greater than 4
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a non-abelian group. Then the order of $\struct {G, \circ}$ is greater than $4$.
It follows from Trivial Group is Cyclic Group and Prime Group is Cyclic that groups of order less than $4$ are cyclic. Therefore, by Cyclic Group is Abelian, all groups of order less than $4$ are abelian. Let $G$ have order $4$. From Order of Element Divides Order of Finite Group, every element of $G$ has order that di...
Let $\struct {G, \circ}$ be a non-[[Definition:Abelian Group|abelian group]]. Then the [[Definition:Order of Structure|order]] of $\struct {G, \circ}$ is greater than $4$.
It follows from [[Trivial Group is Cyclic Group]] and [[Prime Group is Cyclic]] that [[Definition:Group|groups]] of [[Definition:Order of Structure|order]] less than $4$ are [[Definition:Cyclic Group|cyclic]]. Therefore, by [[Cyclic Group is Abelian]], all [[Definition:Group|groups]] of [[Definition:Order of Structure...
Non-Abelian Group has Order Greater than 4/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Group_has_Order_Greater_than_4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Abelian_Group_has_Order_Greater_than_4/Proof_2
[ "Abelian Groups", "Non-Abelian Group has Order Greater than 4" ]
[ "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Order of Structure" ]
[ "Trivial Group is Cyclic Group", "Prime Group is Cyclic", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Cyclic Group", "Cyclic Group is Abelian", "Definition:Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Definition:Abelian Group", "Definition:Order of Structure", "Order of Element...
proofwiki-6209
Bayes' Theorem/General Result
Let $\set {B_1, B_2, \ldots}$ be a partition of the event space $\Sigma$. Then, for any $B_i$ in the partition: :$\condprob {B_i} A = \dfrac {\condprob A {B_i} \map \Pr {B_i} } {\map \Pr A} = \dfrac {\condprob A {B_i} \map \Pr {B_i} } {\sum_j \condprob A {B_j} \map \Pr {B_j} }$ where $\ds \sum_j$ denotes the sum over $...
Follows directly from the Total Probability Theorem: :$\ds \map \Pr A = \sum_i \condprob A {B_i} \map \Pr {B_i}$ and Bayes' Theorem: :$\condprob {B_i} A = \dfrac {\condprob A {B_i} \map \Pr {B_i} } {\map \Pr A}$ {{qed}}
Let $\set {B_1, B_2, \ldots}$ be a [[Definition:Partition (Probability Theory)|partition]] of the [[Definition:Event Space|event space]] $\Sigma$. Then, for any $B_i$ in the [[Definition:Partition (Probability Theory)|partition]]: :$\condprob {B_i} A = \dfrac {\condprob A {B_i} \map \Pr {B_i} } {\map \Pr A} = \dfrac...
Follows directly from the [[Total Probability Theorem]]: :$\ds \map \Pr A = \sum_i \condprob A {B_i} \map \Pr {B_i}$ and [[Bayes' Theorem]]: :$\condprob {B_i} A = \dfrac {\condprob A {B_i} \map \Pr {B_i} } {\map \Pr A}$ {{qed}}
Bayes' Theorem/General Result
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bayes'_Theorem/General_Result
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Bayes'_Theorem/General_Result
[ "Bayes' Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Partition (Probability Theory)", "Definition:Event Space", "Definition:Partition (Probability Theory)", "Definition:Summation" ]
[ "Total Probability Theorem", "Bayes' Theorem" ]
proofwiki-6210
Supremum is Coproduct in Order Category
Let $\mathbf P$ be an order category with ordering $\preceq$. Let $p, q \in P_0$, and suppose they have some supremum $r = \sup \left\{{p, q}\right\}$. Then $r$ is the coproduct of $p$ and $q$ in $\mathbf P$.
Let $\mathbf P^{\text{op}}$ be the dual category of $\mathbf P$. From Dual of Order Category, it is the order category corresponding to the dual ordering $\succeq$. From Dual Pairs (Order Theory), it follows that in $\mathbf P^{\text{op}}$: :$r = \inf \left\{{p, q}\right\}$ where $\inf$ denotes infimum. By Infimum is P...
Let $\mathbf P$ be an [[Definition:Order Category|order category]] with [[Definition:Ordering|ordering]] $\preceq$. Let $p, q \in P_0$, and suppose they have some [[Definition:Supremum of Set|supremum]] $r = \sup \left\{{p, q}\right\}$. Then $r$ is the [[Definition:Coproduct|coproduct]] of $p$ and $q$ in $\mathbf P$...
Let $\mathbf P^{\text{op}}$ be the [[Definition:Dual Category|dual category]] of $\mathbf P$. From [[Dual of Order Category]], it is the [[Definition:Order Category|order category]] corresponding to the [[Definition:Dual Ordering|dual ordering]] $\succeq$. From [[Dual Pairs (Order Theory)]], it follows that in $\mat...
Supremum is Coproduct in Order Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Supremum_is_Coproduct_in_Order_Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Supremum_is_Coproduct_in_Order_Category
[ "Coproducts", "Order Categories" ]
[ "Definition:Order Category", "Definition:Ordering", "Definition:Supremum of Set", "Definition:Coproduct" ]
[ "Definition:Dual Category", "Dual of Order Category", "Definition:Order Category", "Definition:Dual Ordering", "Dual Pairs (Order Theory)", "Definition:Infimum of Set", "Infimum is Product in Order Category", "Definition:Product (Category Theory)/Binary Product", "Dual Pairs (Category Theory)", "D...
proofwiki-6211
Smooth Homotopy is an Equivalence Relation
Let $X$ and $Y$ be smooth manifolds. Let $K \subseteq X$ be a (possibly empty) subset of $X$. Let $\map {\CC^\infty} {X, Y}$ be the set of all smooth mappings from $X$ to $Y$. Define a relation $\sim$ on $\map \CC {X, Y}$ by $f \sim g$ if $f$ and $g$ are smoothly homotopic relative to $K$. Then $\sim$ is an equivalence...
We examine each condition for equivalence.
Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Smooth Manifold|smooth manifolds]]. Let $K \subseteq X$ be a (possibly [[Definition:Empty Set|empty]]) [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $X$. Let $\map {\CC^\infty} {X, Y}$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of all [[Definition:Smooth Mapping (Manifolds)|smooth mappings]] from $X$ to $Y$. De...
We examine each condition for [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence]].
Smooth Homotopy is an Equivalence Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smooth_Homotopy_is_an_Equivalence_Relation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Smooth_Homotopy_is_an_Equivalence_Relation
[ "Homotopy Theory", "Examples of Equivalence Relations" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Manifold/Smooth Manifold", "Definition:Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Smooth Mapping (Manifolds)", "Definition:Relation", "Definition:Smooth Homotopy", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
[ "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Equivalence Relation" ]
proofwiki-6212
Real Function is Continuous at Isolated Point
Let $A \subseteq \R$ be any subset of the real numbers. Let $f: A \to \R$ be a real function. Let $x \in A$ be an isolated point of $A$. Then $f$ is continuous at $x$.
By definition of isolation point: :$\exists \delta \in \R_{> 0}: \openint {x - \delta} {x + \delta} \cap A = \set x$ Pick any $\epsilon > 0$. We have that for any $z \in \openint {x - \delta} {x + \delta} \cap A = \set x$: :$\size {\map f z - \map f x} = \size {\map f x - \map f x} = 0 < \epsilon$. This satisfies the c...
Let $A \subseteq \R$ be any [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $f: A \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Function|real function]]. Let $x \in A$ be an [[Definition:Isolated Point (Real Analysis)|isolated point]] of $A$. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Continuous Real Function at Po...
By definition of [[Definition:Isolated Point (Real Analysis)|isolation point]]: :$\exists \delta \in \R_{> 0}: \openint {x - \delta} {x + \delta} \cap A = \set x$ Pick any $\epsilon > 0$. We have that for any $z \in \openint {x - \delta} {x + \delta} \cap A = \set x$: :$\size {\map f z - \map f x} = \size {\map f ...
Real Function is Continuous at Isolated Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Function_is_Continuous_at_Isolated_Point
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Function_is_Continuous_at_Isolated_Point
[ "Continuity", "Real Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Isolated Point (Real Analysis)", "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Point" ]
[ "Definition:Isolated Point (Real Analysis)", "Definition:Continuous Real Function/Point", "Definition:Limit of Real Function", "Category:Continuity", "Category:Real Functions" ]
proofwiki-6213
Metric Space Continuity by Epsilon-Delta
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a mapping from $A_1$ to $A_2$. Let $a \in A_1$ be a point in $A_1$. Then the following definitions of continuity of $f$ at $a$ with respect to $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent:
=== Definition by Limits implies $\epsilon$-$\delta$ Definition === Suppose that $f$ is $\tuple {d_1, d_2}$-continuous at $a$ in the sense that: :$(1): \quad$ The limit of $\map f x$ as $x \to a$ exists :$(2): \quad \ds \lim_{x \mathop \to a} \map f x = \map f a$ Let $\ds \lim_{x \mathop \to a} \map f x$. Then by the $...
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] from $A_1$ to $A_2$. Let $a \in A_1$ be a point in $A_1$. Then the following definitions of [[Definition:Continuous at Point of Metric Space|continuity...
=== Definition by Limits implies $\epsilon$-$\delta$ Definition === Suppose that [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point/Definition 1|$f$ is $\tuple {d_1, d_2}$-continuous at $a$]] in the sense that: :$(1): \quad$ The [[Definition:Limit of Mapping between Metric Spaces|limit]] of $\map f x$ as $x \to a$ e...
Metric Space Continuity by Epsilon-Delta
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_Continuity_by_Epsilon-Delta
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_Continuity_by_Epsilon-Delta
[ "Continuous Mappings on Metric Spaces", "Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point", "Definition:Logical Equivalence" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point/Definition 1", "Definition:Limit of Mapping between Metric Spaces", "Definition:Limit of Mapping between Metric Spaces/Epsilon-Delta Condition", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point/Definition 2", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space...
proofwiki-6214
Equalizer is Monomorphism
Let $\mathbf C$ be a metacategory. Let $e: E \to C$ be the equalizer of two morphisms $f, g: C \to D$. Then $e$ is a monomorphism.
Suppose that for morphisms $x,y: Z \to E$, it holds that: :$e \circ y = e \circ x$ Putting $z = e \circ x$, the following commutative diagram applies: $\quad\quad \begin{xy}\xymatrix{ E \ar[r]^*{e} & C \ar[r]<2pt>^*{f} \ar[r]<-2pt>_*{g} & D \\ Z \ar[u]<2pt>^*{x} \ar[u]<-2pt>_*{y} \ar[ur]_*{z} }\end{xy}$ It follows t...
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Let $e: E \to C$ be the [[Definition:Equalizer|equalizer]] of two [[Definition:Morphism|morphisms]] $f, g: C \to D$. Then $e$ is a [[Definition:Monomorphism (Category Theory)|monomorphism]].
Suppose that for [[Definition:Morphism|morphisms]] $x,y: Z \to E$, it holds that: :$e \circ y = e \circ x$ Putting $z = e \circ x$, the following [[Definition:Commutative Diagram|commutative diagram]] applies: $\quad\quad \begin{xy}\xymatrix{ E \ar[r]^*{e} & C \ar[r]<2pt>^*{f} \ar[r]<-2pt>_*{g} & D \\ Z \ar[u]<2p...
Equalizer is Monomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equalizer_is_Monomorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equalizer_is_Monomorphism
[ "Monomorphisms (Category Theory)" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Equalizer", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Monomorphism (Category Theory)" ]
[ "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Equalizer", "Definition:Monomorphism (Category Theory)" ]
proofwiki-6215
Metric Space Continuity by Open Ball
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a mapping from $A_1$ to $A_2$. Let $a \in A_1$ be a point in $A_1$. {{TFAE|def = Continuous at Point of Metric Space|view = continuity of $f$ at $a$ with respect to $d_1$ and $d_2$}}
=== $\epsilon$-$\delta$ Definition implies $\epsilon$-Ball Definition === Suppose that $f$ is $\tuple {d_1, d_2}$-continuous at $a$ in the sense that: :$\forall \epsilon \in \R_{>0}: \exists \delta \in \R_{>0}: \forall x \in A_1: \map {d_1} {x, a} < \delta \implies \map {d_2} {\map f x, \map f a} < \epsilon$ where $\R_...
Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be [[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]]. Let $f: A_1 \to A_2$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] from $A_1$ to $A_2$. Let $a \in A_1$ be a point in $A_1$. {{TFAE|def = Continuous at Point of Metric Space|view = continuity of $f$ at $a$ with respect...
=== $\epsilon$-$\delta$ Definition implies $\epsilon$-Ball Definition === Suppose that [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point/Definition 1|$f$ is $\tuple {d_1, d_2}$-continuous at $a$]] in the sense that: :$\forall \epsilon \in \R_{>0}: \exists \delta \in \R_{>0}: \forall x \in A_1: \map {d_1} {x, a} < \...
Metric Space Continuity by Open Ball
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_Continuity_by_Open_Ball
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Metric_Space_Continuity_by_Open_Ball
[ "Open Balls", "Continuous Mappings on Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point/Definition 1", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point/Definition 1", "Definition:By Hypothesis" ]
proofwiki-6216
Mapping from Standard Discrete Metric on Real Number Line is Continuous
Let $\R$ be the real number line. Let $\struct {\R, d_1}$ be the metric space such that $d_1$ be the Euclidean metric on $\R$. Let $\struct {\R, d_2}$ be the metric space such that $d_2$ be the standard discrete metric on $\R$. Let $f: \tuple {\R, d_2} \to \tuple {\R, d_1}$ be a real function. Then $f$ is $\tuple {d_2,...
Let $\epsilon \in \R: \epsilon > 0$. Let $\delta = 1$. Let $x \in \R$. Let $y \in \R$ such that $\map {d_2} {x, y} < \delta$. That is, $\map {d_2} {x, y} < 1$. By the definition of the standard discrete metric on $\R$, that would mean that $\map {d_2} {x, y} = 0$ and so $x = y$. Thus $\map f x = \map f y$. By definitio...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]]. Let $\struct {\R, d_1}$ be the [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] such that $d_1$ be the [[Definition:Euclidean Metric on Real Number Line|Euclidean metric]] on $\R$. Let $\struct {\R, d_2}$ be the [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]] such th...
Let $\epsilon \in \R: \epsilon > 0$. Let $\delta = 1$. Let $x \in \R$. Let $y \in \R$ such that $\map {d_2} {x, y} < \delta$. That is, $\map {d_2} {x, y} < 1$. By the definition of the [[Definition:Standard Discrete Metric|standard discrete metric]] on $\R$, that would mean that $\map {d_2} {x, y} = 0$ and so $x ...
Mapping from Standard Discrete Metric on Real Number Line is Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_from_Standard_Discrete_Metric_on_Real_Number_Line_is_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Mapping_from_Standard_Discrete_Metric_on_Real_Number_Line_is_Continuous
[ "Standard Discrete Metric", "Continuous Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Euclidean Metric/Real Number Line", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Standard Discrete Metric", "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)" ]
[ "Definition:Standard Discrete Metric", "Definition:Metric Space/Metric", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Point", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)/Space" ]
proofwiki-6217
Properties of Affine Spaces
Let $\EE$ be an affine space with difference space $V$. Let $0$ denote the zero element of $V$. Then the following hold for all $p,q,r \in \EE$ and all $u, v \in V$: :$(1): \quad p - p = 0$ :$(2): \quad p + 0 = p$ :$(3): \quad p + u = p + v \iff u = v$ :$(4): \quad q - p = r - p \iff q = r$
=== $(1): \quad p - p = 0$ === We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {p - p} + \paren {q - p} | r = \paren {p + \paren {q - p} } - p }} {{eqn | r = q - p }} {{end-eqn}} From Zero Element is Unique: :$p - p = 0$ {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\EE$ be an [[Definition:Affine Space|affine space]] with [[Definition:Difference Space|difference space]] $V$. Let $0$ denote the [[Definition:Zero Element|zero element]] of $V$. Then the following hold for all $p,q,r \in \EE$ and all $u, v \in V$: :$(1): \quad p - p = 0$ :$(2): \quad p + 0 = p$ :$(3): \quad p ...
=== $(1): \quad p - p = 0$ === We have: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {p - p} + \paren {q - p} | r = \paren {p + \paren {q - p} } - p }} {{eqn | r = q - p }} {{end-eqn}} From [[Zero Element is Unique]]: :$p - p = 0$ {{qed|lemma}}
Properties of Affine Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Properties_of_Affine_Spaces
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Properties_of_Affine_Spaces
[ "Affine Geometry" ]
[ "Definition:Affine Space", "Definition:Tangent Space (Affine Geometry)", "Definition:Zero Element" ]
[ "Zero Element is Unique" ]
proofwiki-6218
Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Right Inverse
Let $S$ be a set. Let $f: \N \to S$ be a mapping, where $\N$ denotes the set of natural numbers. Then $f$ is a surjection {{iff}} $f$ admits a right inverse.
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $g: S \to \N$ is a right inverse of $f$. That is, let $f \circ g = I_S$, the identity mapping on $S$. We have that $I_S$ is a surjection. By Surjection if Composite is Surjection, it follows that $f$ is a surjection. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $f: \N \to S$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]], where $\N$ denotes the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]]. Then $f$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]] {{iff}} $f$ [[Definition:Existential Quantifier|admits]] a [[Definition:Right...
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $g: S \to \N$ is a [[Definition:Right Inverse Mapping|right inverse]] of $f$. That is, let $f \circ g = I_S$, the [[Definition:Identity Mapping|identity mapping]] on $S$. We have that [[Identity Mapping is Surjection|$I_S$ is a surjection]]. By [[Surjection if Composite is ...
Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Right Inverse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Surjection_from_Natural_Numbers_iff_Right_Inverse
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Surjection_from_Natural_Numbers_iff_Right_Inverse
[ "Surjections", "Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Existential Quantifier", "Definition:Right Inverse Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Right Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Identity Mapping", "Identity Mapping is Surjection", "Surjection if Composite is Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Surjection", "Definition:Right Inverse Mapping" ]
proofwiki-6219
Sum of Squared Deviations from Mean
Let $S = \set {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a set of real numbers. Let $\overline x$ denote the arithmetic mean of $S$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x_i - \overline x}^2 = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren { {x_i}^2 - {\overline x}^2}$
For brevity, let us write $\ds \sum$ for $\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum \paren {x_i - \overline x}^2 | r = \sum \paren {x_i - \overline x} \paren {x_i - \overline x} }} {{eqn | r = \sum x_i \paren {x_i - \overline x} - \overline x \sum \paren {x_i - \overline x} | c = Sum...
Let $S = \set {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $\overline x$ denote the [[Definition:Arithmetic Mean|arithmetic mean]] of $S$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x_i - \overline x}^2 = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren { {x_i}^2 - {\overline x...
For brevity, let us write $\ds \sum$ for $\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \sum \paren {x_i - \overline x}^2 | r = \sum \paren {x_i - \overline x} \paren {x_i - \overline x} }} {{eqn | r = \sum x_i \paren {x_i - \overline x} - \overline x \sum \paren {x_i - \overline x} | c = [...
Sum of Squared Deviations from Mean/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Squared_Deviations_from_Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Squared_Deviations_from_Mean/Proof_1
[ "Arithmetic Mean", "Sum of Squared Deviations from Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Arithmetic Mean" ]
[ "Summation is Linear", "Sum of Deviations from Mean", "Sum of Deviations from Mean", "Summation is Linear" ]
proofwiki-6220
Sum of Squared Deviations from Mean
Let $S = \set {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a set of real numbers. Let $\overline x$ denote the arithmetic mean of $S$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x_i - \overline x}^2 = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren { {x_i}^2 - {\overline x}^2}$
In this context, $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ are instances of a discrete random variable. Hence the result Variance as Expectation of Square minus Square of Expectation can be applied: :$\var X = \expect {X^2} - \paren {\expect X}^2$ which means the same as this but in the language of probability theory. {{qed}}
Let $S = \set {x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]]. Let $\overline x$ denote the [[Definition:Arithmetic Mean|arithmetic mean]] of $S$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x_i - \overline x}^2 = \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren { {x_i}^2 - {\overline x...
In this context, $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ are instances of a [[Definition:Discrete Random Variable|discrete random variable]]. Hence the result [[Variance as Expectation of Square minus Square of Expectation]] can be applied: :$\var X = \expect {X^2} - \paren {\expect X}^2$ which means the same as this but in the lang...
Sum of Squared Deviations from Mean/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Squared_Deviations_from_Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Squared_Deviations_from_Mean/Proof_2
[ "Arithmetic Mean", "Sum of Squared Deviations from Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Arithmetic Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Random Variable/Discrete", "Variance as Expectation of Square minus Square of Expectation", "Definition:Probability Theory" ]
proofwiki-6221
Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Countable
Let $S$ be a non-empty set. Then $S$ is countable {{iff}} there exists a surjection $f: \N \to S$.
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $f: \N \to S$ is a surjection. By Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Right Inverse, $f$ admits a right inverse $g: S \to \N$. We have that $g$ is an injection by Right Inverse Mapping is Injection. Hence the result, by the definition of a countable set. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Set|set]]. Then $S$ is [[Definition:Countable|countable]] {{iff}} [[Definition:Existential Quantifier|there exists]] a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]] $f: \N \to S$.
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $f: \N \to S$ is a [[Definition:Surjection|surjection]]. By [[Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Right Inverse]], $f$ [[Definition:Existential Quantifier|admits]] a [[Definition:Right Inverse Mapping|right inverse]] $g: S \to \N$. We have that $g$ is an [[Definition:Injectio...
Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Surjection_from_Natural_Numbers_iff_Countable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Surjection_from_Natural_Numbers_iff_Countable
[ "Countable Sets", "Natural Numbers", "Surjections" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Existential Quantifier", "Definition:Surjection" ]
[ "Definition:Surjection", "Surjection from Natural Numbers iff Right Inverse", "Definition:Existential Quantifier", "Definition:Right Inverse Mapping", "Definition:Injection", "Right Inverse Mapping is Injection", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Countable Set", "Definition:Injection", "Defi...
proofwiki-6222
Sum of Identical Terms
Let $x$ be a number. Let $n \in \N$ be a natural number such that $n \ge 1$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n x = n x$ {{explain|Why limit this to $n \ge 1$? It also works for zero.}}
{{finish|this could be actually nontrivial; induction on $n$ seems easiest}} {{expand|generalize to $x$ an element of a vector space, or for that matter, any abelian group}} Category:Numbers ibd586ciul8200zlipc2qntxpo013c4
Let $x$ be a [[Definition:Number|number]]. Let $n \in \N$ be a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]] such that $n \ge 1$. Then: :$\ds \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n x = n x$ {{explain|Why limit this to $n \ge 1$? It also works for zero.}}
{{finish|this could be actually nontrivial; induction on $n$ seems easiest}} {{expand|generalize to $x$ an element of a vector space, or for that matter, any abelian group}} [[Category:Numbers]] ibd586ciul8200zlipc2qntxpo013c4
Sum of Identical Terms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Identical_Terms
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Identical_Terms
[ "Numbers" ]
[ "Definition:Number", "Definition:Natural Numbers" ]
[ "Category:Numbers" ]
proofwiki-6223
Synthetic Sub-Basis and Analytic Sub-Basis are Compatible
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $\SS \subseteq \powerset X$, where $\powerset X$ denotes the power set of $X$. Then $\SS$ is an analytic sub-basis for $\tau$ {{iff}} $\tau$ is the topology on $X$ generated by the synthetic sub-basis $\SS$.
=== Necessary Condition === Follows directly from the definitions of the generated topology and an analytic sub-basis. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\SS \subseteq \powerset X$, where $\powerset X$ denotes the [[Definition:Power Set|power set]] of $X$. Then $\SS$ is an [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|analytic sub-basis]] for $\tau$ {{iff}} $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Topology Gen...
=== Necessary Condition === Follows directly from the definitions of the [[Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis/Definition 1|generated topology]] and an [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|analytic sub-basis]]. {{qed|lemma}}
Synthetic Sub-Basis and Analytic Sub-Basis are Compatible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Synthetic_Sub-Basis_and_Analytic_Sub-Basis_are_Compatible
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Synthetic_Sub-Basis_and_Analytic_Sub-Basis_are_Compatible
[ "Analytic Sub-Bases", "Synthetic Sub-Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Power Set", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis/Definition 1", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis/Definition 1", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Anal...
proofwiki-6224
Analytic Basis is Analytic Sub-Basis
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $\BB \subseteq \tau$ be an analytic basis for $\tau$. Then $\BB$ is an analytic sub-basis for $\tau$.
{{ProofWanted}} Category:Topological Bases ji3fvxw8xlmd0qk7wbmt0amhqe752sj
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $\BB \subseteq \tau$ be an [[Definition:Analytic Basis|analytic basis]] for $\tau$. Then $\BB$ is an [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|analytic sub-basis]] for $\tau$.
{{ProofWanted}} [[Category:Topological Bases]] ji3fvxw8xlmd0qk7wbmt0amhqe752sj
Analytic Basis is Analytic Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Analytic_Basis_is_Analytic_Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Analytic_Basis_is_Analytic_Sub-Basis
[ "Topological Bases" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Basis (Topology)/Analytic Basis", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis" ]
[ "Category:Topological Bases" ]
proofwiki-6225
Continuity Test using Sub-Basis
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be a mapping. Let $\SS$ be an analytic sub-basis for $\tau_2$. Suppose that: :$\forall S \in \SS: f^{-1} \sqbrk S \in \tau_1$ where $f^{-1} \sqbrk S$ denotes the preimage of $S$ under $f$. Then $f$ is continuous.
Define: :$\ds \BB = \set {\bigcap \AA: \AA \subseteq \SS, \AA \text{ is finite} } \subseteq \powerset {X_2}$ Let $B \in \BB$. Then there exists a finite subset $\AA \subseteq \SS$ such that: :$\ds B = \bigcap \AA$ Hence: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = f^{-1} \sqbrk B | r = f^{-1} \sqbrk {\bigcap \AA} }} {{eqn | r = \b...
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\SS$ be an [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|analytic sub-basis]] for $\tau_2$. Suppose that: :$\forall S \in \SS: f^{-1} \sqbrk S \in \tau_1$ w...
Define: :$\ds \BB = \set {\bigcap \AA: \AA \subseteq \SS, \AA \text{ is finite} } \subseteq \powerset {X_2}$ Let $B \in \BB$. Then [[Definition:Existential Quantifier|there exists]] a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] $\AA \subseteq \SS$ such that: :$\ds B = \bigcap \AA$ Hence: {{begin-eq...
Continuity Test using Sub-Basis/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Test_using_Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Test_using_Sub-Basis/Proof_1
[ "Topological Bases", "Continuous Mappings", "Continuity Test using Sub-Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Preimage/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere" ]
[ "Definition:Existential Quantifier", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Subset", "Preimage of Intersection under Mapping/General Result", "General Intersection Property of Topological Space", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Preimage of Union under Mapping/General Result", "Definition:Con...
proofwiki-6226
Continuity Test using Sub-Basis
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be a mapping. Let $\SS$ be an analytic sub-basis for $\tau_2$. Suppose that: :$\forall S \in \SS: f^{-1} \sqbrk S \in \tau_1$ where $f^{-1} \sqbrk S$ denotes the preimage of $S$ under $f$. Then $f$ is continuous.
Let $\tau$ be the final topology on $X_2$ with respect to $f$. By hypothesis, $\SS \subseteq \tau$. By Synthetic Sub-Basis and Analytic Sub-Basis are Compatible, we have that $\tau_2$ is the topology generated by the synthetic sub-basis $\SS$. By the definition of the generated topology, we have $\tau_2 \subseteq \tau$...
Let $\struct {X_1, \tau_1}$ and $\struct {X_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: X_1 \to X_2$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\SS$ be an [[Definition:Analytic Sub-Basis|analytic sub-basis]] for $\tau_2$. Suppose that: :$\forall S \in \SS: f^{-1} \sqbrk S \in \tau_1$ w...
Let $\tau$ be the [[Definition:Final Topology|final topology on $X_2$ with respect to $f$]]. [[Definition:By Hypothesis|By hypothesis]], $\SS \subseteq \tau$. By [[Synthetic Sub-Basis and Analytic Sub-Basis are Compatible]], we have that $\tau_2$ is the [[Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis|topology ...
Continuity Test using Sub-Basis/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Test_using_Sub-Basis
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuity_Test_using_Sub-Basis/Proof_2
[ "Topological Bases", "Continuous Mappings", "Continuity Test using Sub-Basis" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Sub-Basis/Analytic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Preimage/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)/Everywhere" ]
[ "Definition:Final Topology", "Definition:By Hypothesis", "Synthetic Sub-Basis and Analytic Sub-Basis are Compatible", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis/Definition 2", "Definition:Final Topology", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (...
proofwiki-6227
Product Formula for Sine
:$\ds \map \sin {n z} = 2^{n - 1} \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map \sin {z + \frac {k \pi} n}$
From Gauss Multiplication Formula, we have: :$\ds \forall z \notin \set {-\frac m n: m \in \N}: \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map \Gamma {z + \frac k n} = \paren {2 \pi}^{\paren {n - 1} / 2} n^{1/2 - n z} \map \Gamma {n z}$ Therefore: :$\ds \map \Gamma {n z} = \paren {2 \pi}^{\paren {1 - n} / 2} n^{n z - 1/2} \prod_{k...
:$\ds \map \sin {n z} = 2^{n - 1} \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map \sin {z + \frac {k \pi} n}$
From [[Gauss Multiplication Formula]], we have: :$\ds \forall z \notin \set {-\frac m n: m \in \N}: \prod_{k \mathop = 0}^{n - 1} \map \Gamma {z + \frac k n} = \paren {2 \pi}^{\paren {n - 1} / 2} n^{1/2 - n z} \map \Gamma {n z}$ Therefore: :$\ds \map \Gamma {n z} = \paren {2 \pi}^{\paren {1 - n} / 2} n^{n z - 1/2} \...
Product Formula for Sine/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Formula_for_Sine
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_Formula_for_Sine/Proof_2
[ "Product Formula for Sine", "Sine Function", "Complex Roots of Unity", "Named Theorems" ]
[]
[ "Gauss Multiplication Formula", "Euler's Reflection Formula", "Euler's Reflection Formula", "Gamma Difference Equation", "Gauss Multiplication Formula", "Definition:Fraction/Numerator", "Exponent Combination Laws/Product of Powers", "Definition:Fraction/Denominator", "Exponent Combination Laws/Produ...
proofwiki-6228
Final Topology is Topology
Let $X$ be a set. Let $I$ be an indexing set. Let $\family {\struct {Y_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an $I$-indexed family of topological spaces. Let $\family {f_i: Y_i \to X}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an $I$-indexed family of mappings. Let $\tau$ be the final topology on $X$ with respect to $\family {f_i}_{i \mathop ...
Define: :$\forall i \in I: \vartheta_i = \set {U \subseteq X: \map {f_i^{-1} } U \in \tau_i} \subseteq \powerset X$ Then, by the definition of intersection: :$\ds \tau = \bigcap_{i \mathop \in I} \vartheta_i$ From the Intersection of Topologies is Topology, it suffices to show, for all $i \in I$, that $\vartheta_i$ is ...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $I$ be an [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexing set]]. Let $\family {\struct {Y_i, \tau_i} }_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an [[Definition:Indexed Family|$I$-indexed family]] of [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $\family {f_i: Y_i \to X}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an ...
Define: :$\forall i \in I: \vartheta_i = \set {U \subseteq X: \map {f_i^{-1} } U \in \tau_i} \subseteq \powerset X$ Then, by the definition of [[Definition:Intersection of Family|intersection]]: :$\ds \tau = \bigcap_{i \mathop \in I} \vartheta_i$ From the [[Intersection of Topologies is Topology]], it suffices to sho...
Final Topology is Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Final_Topology_is_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Final_Topology_is_Topology
[ "Final Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Indexing Set/Family", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Final Topology", "Definition:Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Set Intersection/Family of Sets", "Intersection of Topologies is Topology", "Definition:Universal Quantifier", "Definition:Topology", "Axiom:Open Set Axioms", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Axiom:Open Set Axioms" ]
proofwiki-6229
Subspace Topology is Initial Topology with respect to Inclusion Mapping
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $Y$ be a non-empty subset of $X$. Let $\iota: Y \to X$ be the inclusion mapping. Let $\tau_Y$ be the initial topology on $Y$ with respect to $\iota$. Then $\struct {Y, \tau_Y}$ is a topological subspace of $\struct {X, \tau}$. That is: :$\tau_Y = \set {U \cap Y: U \in...
By Initial Topology with respect to Mapping equals Set of Preimages, it follows that: :$\tau_Y = \set {\iota^{-1} \sqbrk U: U \in \tau}$ From Preimage of Subset under Inclusion Mapping, we have: :$\forall S \subseteq X: \iota^{-1} \sqbrk S = S \cap Y$ Hence the result. {{qed}} Category:Topological Subspaces Category:In...
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $Y$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $X$. Let $\iota: Y \to X$ be the [[Definition:Inclusion Mapping|inclusion mapping]]. Let $\tau_Y$ be the [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]...
By [[Initial Topology with respect to Mapping equals Set of Preimages]], it follows that: :$\tau_Y = \set {\iota^{-1} \sqbrk U: U \in \tau}$ From [[Preimage of Subset under Inclusion Mapping]], we have: :$\forall S \subseteq X: \iota^{-1} \sqbrk S = S \cap Y$ Hence the result. {{qed}} [[Category:Topological Subspace...
Subspace Topology is Initial Topology with respect to Inclusion Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_Topology_is_Initial_Topology_with_respect_to_Inclusion_Mapping
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subspace_Topology_is_Initial_Topology_with_respect_to_Inclusion_Mapping
[ "Topological Subspaces", "Inclusion Mappings", "Initial Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Inclusion Mapping", "Definition:Initial Topology", "Definition:Topological Subspace" ]
[ "Initial Topology with respect to Mapping equals Set of Preimages", "Preimage of Subset under Inclusion Mapping", "Category:Topological Subspaces", "Category:Inclusion Mappings", "Category:Initial Topology" ]
proofwiki-6230
Topological Subspace is Topological Space
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq X$ be a non-empty subset of $X$. Let $\tau_H = \set {U \cap H: U \in \tau}$ be the subspace topology on $H$. Then the topological subspace $\struct {H, \tau_H}$ is a topological space.
We verify the open set axioms for $\tau_H$ to be a topology on $H$. === {{Open-set-axiom|1|nolink}} === Let $\AA \subseteq \tau_H$. It is to be shown that: :$\ds \bigcup \AA \in \tau_H$ Define: :$\ds \AA' = \set {V \in \tau: V \cap H \subseteq \bigcup \AA} \subseteq \tau$ Let: :$\ds U = \bigcup \AA'$ By the definition ...
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq X$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $X$. Let $\tau_H = \set {U \cap H: U \in \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace topology]] on $H$. Then the [[Definition:...
We verify the [[Axiom:Open Set Axioms|open set axioms]] for $\tau_H$ to be a [[Definition:Topology|topology]] on $H$. === {{Open-set-axiom|1|nolink}} === Let $\AA \subseteq \tau_H$. It is to be shown that: :$\ds \bigcup \AA \in \tau_H$ Define: :$\ds \AA' = \set {V \in \tau: V \cap H \subseteq \bigcup \AA} \subset...
Topological Subspace is Topological Space/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Subspace_is_Topological_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Subspace_is_Topological_Space/Proof_1
[ "Topological Subspace is Topological Space", "Topological Subspaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Topological Space" ]
[ "Axiom:Open Set Axioms", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Intersection Distributes over Union", "Union is Smallest Superset/Family of Sets", "Set is Subset of Union/General Result", "Set is Subset of Union/General Result", "Set Intersection Preserves Subsets/Corollary", "Union is Small...
proofwiki-6231
Topological Subspace is Topological Space
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a topological space. Let $H \subseteq X$ be a non-empty subset of $X$. Let $\tau_H = \set {U \cap H: U \in \tau}$ be the subspace topology on $H$. Then the topological subspace $\struct {H, \tau_H}$ is a topological space.
Follows directly from Subspace Topology is Initial Topology with respect to Inclusion Mapping. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $H \subseteq X$ be a [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty]] [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $X$. Let $\tau_H = \set {U \cap H: U \in \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace topology]] on $H$. Then the [[Definition:...
Follows directly from [[Subspace Topology is Initial Topology with respect to Inclusion Mapping]]. {{qed}}
Topological Subspace is Topological Space/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Subspace_is_Topological_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Topological_Subspace_is_Topological_Space/Proof_2
[ "Topological Subspace is Topological Space", "Topological Subspaces" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Topological Space" ]
[ "Subspace Topology is Initial Topology with respect to Inclusion Mapping" ]
proofwiki-6232
Initial Topology with respect to Mapping equals Set of Preimages
Let $X$ be a set. Let $\struct {Y, \tau_Y}$ be a topological space. Let $f: X \to Y$ be a mapping. Let $\tau_X$ be the initial topology on $X$ {{WRT}} $f$. Then: :$\tau_X = \set {f^{-1} \sqbrk U: U \in \tau_Y}$
Define: :$\tau = \set {f^{-1} \sqbrk U: U \in \tau_Y}$ By definition, $\tau_X$ is the topology generated by $\tau$. Therefore: :$\tau \subseteq \tau_X$ If $\tau$ is a topology on $X$, then it follows from the definition of the generated topology that: :$\tau_X \subseteq \tau$ By definition of set equality: :$\tau_X = \...
Let $X$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]]. Let $\struct {Y, \tau_Y}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $f: X \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]]. Let $\tau_X$ be the [[Definition:Initial Topology|initial topology]] on $X$ {{WRT}} $f$. Then: :$\tau_X = \set {f^{-1} \sqbrk U: U \in \tau_Y...
Define: :$\tau = \set {f^{-1} \sqbrk U: U \in \tau_Y}$ By definition, $\tau_X$ is the [[Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis|topology generated]] by $\tau$. Therefore: :$\tau \subseteq \tau_X$ If $\tau$ is a [[Definition:Topology|topology]] on $X$, then it follows from the definition of the [[Defini...
Initial Topology with respect to Mapping equals Set of Preimages
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Topology_with_respect_to_Mapping_equals_Set_of_Preimages
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Initial_Topology_with_respect_to_Mapping_equals_Set_of_Preimages
[ "Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Initial Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Topology Generated by Synthetic Sub-Basis/Definition 2", "Definition:Set Equality/Definition 2", "Definition:Topology", "Axiom:Open Set Axioms", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Definition:Set Eq...
proofwiki-6233
Sommerfeld-Watson Transform
Let $\map f z$ be a mapping with isolated poles. {{explain|Explain the context in which this theorem is placed. For example, what is the domain and range of $f$? One supposes $\C$ but it needs to be made clear.}} Let $f$ go to zero faster than $\dfrac 1 {\size z}$ as $\size z \to \infty$. {{explain|"faster"}} Let $C$ b...
From Cauchy's Residue Theorem: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \oint_C \map f z \rd z | r = 2 \pi i \, \sum \limits_{z_k} R_k(z_k) | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \pi i \, \sum_{z_k} \lim_{z \mathop \to z_k} \paren {\paren {z - z_k} \frac {\map f z} {\sin \pi z} } | c = }} {{end-eqn}} This is for poles $z_k$ at or...
Let $\map f z$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] with isolated poles. {{explain|Explain the context in which this theorem is placed. For example, what is the domain and range of $f$? One supposes $\C$ but it needs to be made clear.}} Let $f$ go to zero faster than $\dfrac 1 {\size z}$ as $\size z \to \infty$. {{ex...
From [[Cauchy's Residue Theorem]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \oint_C \map f z \rd z | r = 2 \pi i \, \sum \limits_{z_k} R_k(z_k) | c = }} {{eqn | r = 2 \pi i \, \sum_{z_k} \lim_{z \mathop \to z_k} \paren {\paren {z - z_k} \frac {\map f z} {\sin \pi z} } | c = }} {{end-eqn}} This is for poles $z_k...
Sommerfeld-Watson Transform
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sommerfeld-Watson_Transform
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sommerfeld-Watson_Transform
[ "Complex Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping" ]
[ "Cauchy's Residue Theorem", "Category:Complex Analysis" ]
proofwiki-6234
Linear Transformation of Arithmetic Mean
Let $D = \set {x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a set of real data describing a quantitative variable. Let $\overline x$ be the arithmetic mean of the data in $D$. Let $T: \R \to \R$ be a linear transformation such that: :$\forall i \in \set {0, 1, \ldots, n}: \map T {x_i} = \lambda x_i + \gamma$ Let $T \sqbrk D$ be the...
Follows from the definition of arithmetic mean and from Summation is Linear. {{qed}}
Let $D = \set {x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] data describing a [[Definition:Quantitative Variable|quantitative variable]]. Let $\overline x$ be the [[Definition:Arithmetic Mean|arithmetic mean]] of the data in $D$. Let $T: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Line...
Follows from the [[Definition:Arithmetic Mean|definition of arithmetic mean]] and from [[Summation is Linear]]. {{qed}}
Linear Transformation of Arithmetic Mean/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_of_Arithmetic_Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_of_Arithmetic_Mean/Proof_1
[ "Arithmetic Mean", "Linear Transformations", "Linear Transformation of Arithmetic Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Variable/Descriptive Statistics/Quantitative Variable", "Definition:Arithmetic Mean", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Arithmetic Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Arithmetic Mean", "Summation is Linear" ]
proofwiki-6235
Linear Transformation of Arithmetic Mean
Let $D = \set {x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a set of real data describing a quantitative variable. Let $\overline x$ be the arithmetic mean of the data in $D$. Let $T: \R \to \R$ be a linear transformation such that: :$\forall i \in \set {0, 1, \ldots, n}: \map T {x_i} = \lambda x_i + \gamma$ Let $T \sqbrk D$ be the...
This is a direct application of Expectation is Linear. {{qed}}
Let $D = \set {x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n}$ be a [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real]] data describing a [[Definition:Quantitative Variable|quantitative variable]]. Let $\overline x$ be the [[Definition:Arithmetic Mean|arithmetic mean]] of the data in $D$. Let $T: \R \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Line...
This is a direct application of [[Expectation is Linear]]. {{qed}}
Linear Transformation of Arithmetic Mean/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_of_Arithmetic_Mean
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Linear_Transformation_of_Arithmetic_Mean/Proof_2
[ "Arithmetic Mean", "Linear Transformations", "Linear Transformation of Arithmetic Mean" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Variable/Descriptive Statistics/Quantitative Variable", "Definition:Arithmetic Mean", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Mapping", "Definition:Arithmetic Mean" ]
[ "Expectation is Linear" ]
proofwiki-6236
Category of Pointed Sets is Category
Let $\mathbf{Set}_*$ be the category of pointed sets. Then $\mathbf{Set}_*$ is a metacategory.
The axioms $(\text C 1)$ to $(\text C 3)$ are checked for a metacategory. Pick any two morphisms $f : \struct {A, a} \to \struct {B, b}$ and $g : \struct {B, b} \to \struct {C, c}$ from $\mathbf{Set}_*$. By the definition of composition in the category of pointed sets: :$\map {\paren {g \circ f} } a = \map g {\map f a}...
Let $\mathbf{Set}_*$ be the [[Definition:Category of Pointed Sets|category of pointed sets]]. Then $\mathbf{Set}_*$ is a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]].
The axioms $(\text C 1)$ to $(\text C 3)$ are checked for a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Pick any two [[Definition:Morphism|morphisms]] $f : \struct {A, a} \to \struct {B, b}$ and $g : \struct {B, b} \to \struct {C, c}$ from $\mathbf{Set}_*$. By the definition of [[Definition:Composition of Morphisms|co...
Category of Pointed Sets is Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Pointed_Sets_is_Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Pointed_Sets_is_Category
[ "Category Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Category of Pointed Sets", "Definition:Metacategory" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Composition of Morphisms", "Definition:Category of Pointed Sets", "Definition:Pointed Mapping", "Definition:Pointed Mapping", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Composition of Mappings is Associative", "Definition:Object (Category Theor...
proofwiki-6237
Closed Set in Topological Subspace/Corollary
Let $H$ be closed in $T$. Then $V \subseteq H$ is closed in $T'$ {{iff}} $V$ is closed in $T$.
Let $V \subseteq H$ be closed in $T'$. Then, from Closed Set in Topological Subspace, $V = H \cap V$ is closed in $T'$. If $V$ is closed in $T'$ then $V = H \cap W$ where $W$ is closed in $T$. Since $H$ is closed in $T$, it follows by Topology Defined by Closed Sets that $V$ is closed in $T$. {{qed}}
Let $H$ be [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$. Then $V \subseteq H$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T'$ {{iff}} $V$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T$.
Let $V \subseteq H$ be [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T'$. Then, from [[Closed Set in Topological Subspace]], $V = H \cap V$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T'$. If $V$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $T'$ then $V = H \cap W$ where $W$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (...
Closed Set in Topological Subspace/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Set_in_Topological_Subspace/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Set_in_Topological_Subspace/Corollary
[ "Closed Sets", "Topological Subspaces" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Closed Set in Topological Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Topology Defined by Closed Sets", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
proofwiki-6238
Unit Interval is Path-Connected in Real Numbers
Let $\R$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean} metric. The closed unit interval $\I = \closedint 0 1$ is a path-connected metric subspace of $\R$.
Follows directly from Subset of Real Numbers is Path-Connected iff Interval. {{qed}}
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Metric|real number line with the usual (Euclidean} metric]]. The [[Definition:Closed Unit Interval|closed unit interval]] $\I = \closedint 0 1$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Metric Subspace|path-connected metric subspace]] of $\R$.
Follows directly from [[Subset of Real Numbers is Path-Connected iff Interval]]. {{qed}}
Unit Interval is Path-Connected in Real Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unit_Interval_is_Path-Connected_in_Real_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Unit_Interval_is_Path-Connected_in_Real_Numbers
[ "Path-Connected Sets", "Real Intervals" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Metric/Real Number Line", "Definition:Real Interval/Unit Interval/Closed", "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space/Subset" ]
[ "Subset of Real Numbers is Path-Connected iff Interval" ]
proofwiki-6239
Subset of Real Numbers is Path-Connected iff Interval
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a subset of $\R$. Then $S$ is a path-connected metric subspace of $\R$ {{iff}} $S$ is a real interval.
=== Necessary Condition === Let $S$ be a path-connected metric subspace of $\R$. From Path-Connected Space is Connected, it follows that $S$ is connected. From Subset of Real Numbers is Interval iff Connected, it follows that $S$ is a real interval. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $\R$. Then $S$ is a [[Definition:Path-Connected Metric Subspace|path-connected metric subspace]] of $\R$ {{iff}} $S$ is a [[Defin...
=== Necessary Condition === Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Path-Connected Metric Subspace|path-connected metric subspace]] of $\R$. From [[Path-Connected Space is Connected]], it follows that $S$ is [[Definition:Connected Set (Topology)|connected]]. From [[Subset of Real Numbers is Interval iff Connected]], it follows th...
Subset of Real Numbers is Path-Connected iff Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Path-Connected_iff_Interval
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Path-Connected_iff_Interval
[ "Path-Connected Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space/Subset", "Definition:Real Interval" ]
[ "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space/Subset", "Path-Connected Space is Connected", "Definition:Connected Set (Topology)", "Subset of Real Numbers is Interval iff Connected", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Real Interval" ]
proofwiki-6240
Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator
Let $R$ be a division ring. Let $V$ be an $R$-vector space. Let $F \subseteq V$ be a finite generator of $V$ over $R$. Let $L \subseteq V$ be linearly independent over $R$. Then: :$\size L \le \size F$
We first consider the case where $L$ is finite. Let $S \subseteq \N$ be the set of all $n \in \N$ such that: :For every finite generator $F$ of $V$, if $\card {L \setminus F} \le n$, then $\card L \le \card F$ where: :$L \setminus F$ denotes the set difference between $L$ and $F$ :$\card L$ and $\card F$ denote the car...
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. Let $V$ be an [[Definition:Vector Space|$R$-vector space]]. Let $F \subseteq V$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] of $V$ over $R$. Let $L \subseteq V$ be [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independen...
We first consider the case where $L$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]]. Let $S \subseteq \N$ be the set of all $n \in \N$ such that: :For every [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Generator of Vector Space|generator]] $F$ of $V$, if $\card {L \setminus F} \le n$, then $\card L \le \card F$ where: :$L \setm...
Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Size_of_Linearly_Independent_Subset_is_at_Most_Size_of_Finite_Generator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Size_of_Linearly_Independent_Subset_is_at_Most_Size_of_Finite_Generator/Proof_1
[ "Vector Spaces", "Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator" ]
[ "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Generator of Vector Space", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Cardinality", "Principle of Finite Induction", "Cardinality of Empty Set", "Set Difference with Superset is Empty Set", "Cardinality of Subset of Finite Set", "Definit...
proofwiki-6241
Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator
Let $R$ be a division ring. Let $V$ be an $R$-vector space. Let $F \subseteq V$ be a finite generator of $V$ over $R$. Let $L \subseteq V$ be linearly independent over $R$. Then: :$\size L \le \size F$
Let $S \subseteq \N$ be the set of all natural numbers $n \in \N$ such that: :For any finite generator $F$ of $V$ over $R$, if $\card {F \cap L} \ge n$, then $\card L \le \card F$. It is to be demonstrated that $S = \N$. That is, that $\card {F \cap L} \ge n \implies \card L \le \card F$ for all $n \in \N$. By Intersec...
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. Let $V$ be an [[Definition:Vector Space|$R$-vector space]]. Let $F \subseteq V$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] of $V$ over $R$. Let $L \subseteq V$ be [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independen...
Let $S \subseteq \N$ be the set of all [[Definition:Natural Numbers|natural numbers]] $n \in \N$ such that: :For any [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] $F$ of $V$ over $R$, if $\card {F \cap L} \ge n$, then $\card L \le \card F$. It is to be demonstrated that $S = \N$. That ...
Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Size_of_Linearly_Independent_Subset_is_at_Most_Size_of_Finite_Generator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Size_of_Linearly_Independent_Subset_is_at_Most_Size_of_Finite_Generator/Proof_2
[ "Vector Spaces", "Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator" ]
[ "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Intersection is Subset", "Cardinality of Subset of Finite Set", "Definition:Vacuous Truth", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Well-Ordering Principle", "Definition:Smallest Element", "Cardinality of Subset of Fini...
proofwiki-6242
Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator
Let $R$ be a division ring. Let $V$ be an $R$-vector space. Let $F \subseteq V$ be a finite generator of $V$ over $R$. Let $L \subseteq V$ be linearly independent over $R$. Then: :$\size L \le \size F$
Let $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n$ be a generator of $V$. Let $\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_r$ be a linearly independent set of elements of $V$. Hence the sequence $\sequence {\xi_1, \alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n}$ is a linearly dependent sequence of elements of $V$. One of these elements, which cannot be $...
Let $R$ be a [[Definition:Division Ring|division ring]]. Let $V$ be an [[Definition:Vector Space|$R$-vector space]]. Let $F \subseteq V$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]] [[Definition:Generator of Module|generator]] of $V$ over $R$. Let $L \subseteq V$ be [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independen...
Let $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n$ be a [[Definition:Generator of Vector Space|generator]] of $V$. Let $\xi_1, \xi_2, \ldots, \xi_r$ be a [[Definition:Linearly Independent Set|linearly independent set]] of [[Definition:Element|elements]] of $V$. Hence the [[Definition:Sequence|sequence]] $\sequence {\xi_1, \a...
Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Size_of_Linearly_Independent_Subset_is_at_Most_Size_of_Finite_Generator
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Size_of_Linearly_Independent_Subset_is_at_Most_Size_of_Finite_Generator/Proof_3
[ "Vector Spaces", "Size of Linearly Independent Subset is at Most Size of Finite Generator" ]
[ "Definition:Division Ring", "Definition:Vector Space", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Generator of Module", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Generator of Vector Space", "Definition:Linearly Independent/Set", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Linearly Dependent/Sequence", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Linear Combination/Subset", "Definition:Element", "Definition:Element", "D...
proofwiki-6243
Intermediate Value Theorem/Corollary
Let $0 \in \R$ lie between $\map f a$ and $\map f b$. That is, either: :$\map f a < 0 < \map f b$ or: :$\map f b < 0 < \map f a$ Then $f$ has a root in $\openint a b$.
Follows directly from the Intermediate Value Theorem and from the definition of root. {{qed}}
Let $0 \in \R$ lie between $\map f a$ and $\map f b$. That is, either: :$\map f a < 0 < \map f b$ or: :$\map f b < 0 < \map f a$ Then $f$ has a [[Definition:Root of Function|root]] in $\openint a b$.
Follows directly from the [[Intermediate Value Theorem]] and from the definition of [[Definition:Root of Function|root]]. {{qed}}
Intermediate Value Theorem/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intermediate_Value_Theorem/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intermediate_Value_Theorem/Corollary
[ "Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Root of Mapping" ]
[ "Intermediate Value Theorem", "Definition:Root of Mapping" ]
proofwiki-6244
Real Number Line with Point Removed is Not Path-Connected
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $x \in \R$ be a real number. Then $\R \setminus \set x$, where $\setminus$ denotes set difference, is not path-connected.
We have that $x - 1$ and $x + 1$ are both real numbers, so: :$x - 1 \in \R \setminus \set x$ :$x + 1 \in \R \setminus \set x$ Let $\I := \closedint 0 1$ be the closed unit interval. {{AimForCont}} there exists a path $f: \I \to \R \setminus \set x$ from $x - 1$ to $x + 1$. Then by Image of Real Interval under Continuou...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $x \in \R$ be a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]]. Then $\R \setminus \set x$, where $\setminus$ denotes [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]], is ...
We have that $x - 1$ and $x + 1$ are both [[Definition:Real Number|real numbers]], so: :$x - 1 \in \R \setminus \set x$ :$x + 1 \in \R \setminus \set x$ Let $\I := \closedint 0 1$ be the [[Definition:Closed Unit Interval|closed unit interval]]. {{AimForCont}} there exists a [[Definition:Path (Topology)|path]] $f: \I ...
Real Number Line with Point Removed is Not Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_with_Point_Removed_is_Not_Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Number_Line_with_Point_Removed_is_Not_Path-Connected
[ "Real Number Line with Euclidean Topology", "Examples of Path-Connected Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space/Euclidean Topology/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space/Subset" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Real Interval/Unit Interval/Closed", "Definition:Path (Topology)", "Image of Real Interval under Continuous Real Function is Real Interval", "Definition:Set Difference", "Definition:Contradiction", "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space/Subset" ]
proofwiki-6245
Euclidean Space is Path-Connected
Let $\R^n$ be the $n$-dimensional Euclidean space for $n \in \N$ a natural number. Then $\R^n$ is path-connected.
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y \in \R^n$ be arbitrary points of $\R^n$. Define $l: \closedint 0 1 \to \R^n$ by: :$\map l t = \paren {1 - t} \mathbf x + t \mathbf y$ Then $\map l 0 = 1 \mathbf x + 0 \mathbf y = \mathbf x$, whereas $\map l 1 = 0 \mathbf x + 1 \mathbf y = \mathbf y$. Finally, it remains to show that $l$ is con...
Let $\R^n$ be the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|$n$-dimensional Euclidean space]] for $n \in \N$ a [[Definition:Natural Number|natural number]]. Then $\R^n$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Metric Space|path-connected]].
Let $\mathbf x, \mathbf y \in \R^n$ be arbitrary points of $\R^n$. Define $l: \closedint 0 1 \to \R^n$ by: :$\map l t = \paren {1 - t} \mathbf x + t \mathbf y$ Then $\map l 0 = 1 \mathbf x + 0 \mathbf y = \mathbf x$, whereas $\map l 1 = 0 \mathbf x + 1 \mathbf y = \mathbf y$. Finally, it remains to show that $l$ i...
Euclidean Space is Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclidean_Space_is_Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclidean_Space_is_Path-Connected
[ "Euclidean Spaces", "Examples of Path-Connected Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Natural Numbers", "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Euclidean Norm", "Triangle Inequality/Vectors in Euclidean Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Path (Topology)", "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-6246
Coequalizer is Epimorphism
Let $\mathbf C$ be a metacategory. Let $q: D \to Q$ be the coequalizer of two morphisms $f, g: C \to D$. Then $q$ is an epimorphism.
Follows directly from Equalizer is Monomorphism and the Duality Principle. {{qed}}
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Let $q: D \to Q$ be the [[Definition:Coequalizer|coequalizer]] of two [[Definition:Morphism|morphisms]] $f, g: C \to D$. Then $q$ is an [[Definition:Epimorphism (Category Theory)|epimorphism]].
Follows directly from [[Equalizer is Monomorphism]] and the [[Duality Principle (Category Theory)|Duality Principle]]. {{qed}}
Coequalizer is Epimorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Coequalizer_is_Epimorphism
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Coequalizer_is_Epimorphism
[ "Epimorphisms" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Coequalizer", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Epimorphism (Category Theory)" ]
[ "Equalizer is Monomorphism", "Duality Principle (Category Theory)" ]
proofwiki-6247
Ordering on Multiindices is Partial Order
Let $Z$ be the set of multiindices indexed by a set $J$. The ordering on $Z$ is a partial ordering.
Let $\le$ denote the ordering on integers. Let $\preceq$ denote the ordeing on multiindices. Recall that if $k = \family {k_j}_{j \mathop \in J}$ and $\ell = \family {\ell_j}_{j \mathop \in J}$ are multiindices, then $k \le \ell$ if $k_j \preceq \ell_j$ for all $j \in J$. Let $k$ and $\ell$ be as above, and let $m = \f...
Let $Z$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Multiindex|multiindices]] [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexed]] by a set $J$. The [[Definition:Ordering on Multiindices|ordering on $Z$]] is a [[Definition:Partial Ordering|partial ordering]].
Let $\le$ denote the [[Definition:Ordering on Integers|ordering on integers]]. Let $\preceq$ denote the ordeing on multiindices. Recall that if $k = \family {k_j}_{j \mathop \in J}$ and $\ell = \family {\ell_j}_{j \mathop \in J}$ are multiindices, then $k \le \ell$ if $k_j \preceq \ell_j$ for all $j \in J$. Let $k$ ...
Ordering on Multiindices is Partial Order
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_Multiindices_is_Partial_Order
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Ordering_on_Multiindices_is_Partial_Order
[ "Polynomial Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Multiindex", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Ordering on Multiindices", "Definition:Partial Ordering" ]
[ "Definition:Ordering on Integers", "Integers under Addition form Totally Ordered Group", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Totally Ordered Set", "Definition:Ordering on Integers", "Definition:Reflexive Relation", "Definition:Antisymmetric Relation", "Definition:Transitive Relation", "Definition:Refl...
proofwiki-6248
Euclidean Space without Origin is Path-Connected
Let $n \in \Z: n \ge 2$. Let $\R^n$ be the $n$-dimensional Euclidean space. Let $\R^n \setminus \set {\mathbf 0}$ be $\R^n$ with the origin removed. Then $\R^n \setminus \set {\mathbf 0}$ is path-connected.
{{proof wanted|Another day, this is tedious.}}
Let $n \in \Z: n \ge 2$. Let $\R^n$ be the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|$n$-dimensional Euclidean space]]. Let $\R^n \setminus \set {\mathbf 0}$ be $\R^n$ with the [[Definition:Origin|origin]] removed. Then $\R^n \setminus \set {\mathbf 0}$ is [[Definition:Path-Connected Metric Subspace|path-connected]].
{{proof wanted|Another day, this is tedious.}}
Euclidean Space without Origin is Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclidean_Space_without_Origin_is_Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclidean_Space_without_Origin_is_Path-Connected
[ "Path-Connected Spaces", "Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Coordinate System/Origin", "Definition:Path-Connected/Metric Space/Subset" ]
[]
proofwiki-6249
Multiindices under Addition form Commutative Monoid
Let $Z$ be the set of multiindices. Let $+$ denote the addition of multiindices. Then $\left({Z, +}\right)$ is a commutative monoid.
We check each of the axioms in turn. Let $k = \left \langle {k_j}\right \rangle_{j \in J}$, $\ell = \left \langle {\ell_j}\right \rangle_{j \in J}$ and $m = \left \langle {m_j}\right \rangle_{j \in J}$ be multiindices.
Let $Z$ be the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Multiindex|multiindices]]. Let $+$ denote the [[Definition:Addition/Multiindices|addition of multiindices]]. Then $\left({Z, +}\right)$ is a [[Definition:Commutative Monoid|commutative monoid]].
We check each of the axioms in turn. Let $k = \left \langle {k_j}\right \rangle_{j \in J}$, $\ell = \left \langle {\ell_j}\right \rangle_{j \in J}$ and $m = \left \langle {m_j}\right \rangle_{j \in J}$ be [[Definition:Multiindex|multiindices]].
Multiindices under Addition form Commutative Monoid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiindices_under_Addition_form_Commutative_Monoid
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Multiindices_under_Addition_form_Commutative_Monoid
[ "Polynomial Theory" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Multiindex", "Definition:Addition/Multiindices", "Definition:Commutative Monoid" ]
[ "Definition:Multiindex", "Definition:Multiindex" ]
proofwiki-6250
Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous/Corollary
Let $T_1, T_2, T_3$ each be one of: :metric spaces :the complex plane :the real number line Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ and $g: T_2 \to T_3$ be continuous mappings. Then the composite mapping $g \circ f: T_1 \to T_3$ is continuous.
These follow directly from: * Real Number Line is Metric Space * Complex Plane is Metric Space * Metric Induces Topology {{explain|How the claim follows from these links? Noting is proved about the continuity of the composition.}} {{qed}}
Let $T_1, T_2, T_3$ each be one of: :[[Definition:Metric Space|metric spaces]] :the [[Definition:Complex Plane|complex plane]] :the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ and $g: T_2 \to T_3$ be [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mappings]]. Then the [[Definition:C...
These follow directly from: * [[Real Number Line is Metric Space]] * [[Complex Plane is Metric Space]] * [[Metric Induces Topology]] {{explain|How the claim follows from these links? Noting is proved about the continuity of the composition.}} {{qed}}
Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_of_Continuous_Mappings_is_Continuous/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Composite_of_Continuous_Mappings_is_Continuous/Corollary
[ "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Continuous Real Functions", "Continuous Complex Functions", "Continuous Mappings on Metric Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complex Number/Complex Plane", "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Composition of Mappings", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)" ]
[ "Real Number Line is Metric Space", "Complex Plane is Metric Space", "Metric Induces Topology" ]
proofwiki-6251
Binomial Theorem/Multiindex
Let $\alpha$ be a multiindex, indexed by $\set {1, \ldots, n}$ such that $\alpha_j \ge 0$ for $j = 1, \ldots, n$. Let $x = \tuple {x_1, \ldots, x_n}$ and $y = \tuple {y_1, \ldots, y_n}$ be ordered tuples of real numbers. Then: :$\ds \paren {x + y}^\alpha = \sum_{0 \mathop \le \beta \mathop \le \alpha} \dbinom \alpha \b...
First of all, by definition of multiindexed powers: :$\ds \paren {x + y}^\alpha = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x_k + y_k}^{\alpha_k}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {x + y}^\alpha | r = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{\beta_k \mathop = 0}^{\alpha_k} \dbinom {\alpha_k} {\beta_k} x_k^{\alpha_k - \beta_k} y...
Let $\alpha$ be a [[Definition:Multiindex|multiindex]], [[Definition:Indexing Set|indexed]] by $\set {1, \ldots, n}$ such that $\alpha_j \ge 0$ for $j = 1, \ldots, n$. Let $x = \tuple {x_1, \ldots, x_n}$ and $y = \tuple {y_1, \ldots, y_n}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Tuple|ordered tuples]] of [[Definition:Real Number|real...
First of all, by definition of [[Definition:Power (Algebra)/Multiindices|multiindexed powers]]: :$\ds \paren {x + y}^\alpha = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n \paren {x_k + y_k}^{\alpha_k}$ Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \paren {x + y}^\alpha | r = \prod_{k \mathop = 1}^n \sum_{\beta_k \mathop = 0}^{\alpha_k} \dbinom ...
Binomial Theorem/Multiindex
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Multiindex
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem/Multiindex
[ "Binomial Theorem" ]
[ "Definition:Multiindex", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Ordered Tuple", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Binomial Coefficient/Multiindices" ]
[ "Definition:Power (Algebra)/Multiindices", "Binomial Theorem/Integral Index", "Definition:Multiplication", "Category:Binomial Theorem" ]
proofwiki-6252
Continuous Image of Path-Connected Set is Path-Connected
Let $\struct {T_1, \tau_1}, \struct {T_2, \tau_2}$ be topological spaces. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a continuous mapping. Let $S \subseteq T_1$ be a subset of $T_1$. Let $S$ be path-connected in $\struct {T_1, \tau_1}$. Then $f \sqbrk S$ is path-connected in $\struct {T_2, \tau_2}$.
Let $\map f s, \map f {s'} \in f \sqbrk S$, for some $s, s' \in S$. Let $\mathbb I$ denote the closed unit interval: :$\mathbb I = \closedint 0 1$ Let $p: \mathbb I \to S$ be a continuous mapping such that: :$\map p 0 = s, \map p 1 = s'$ Such a $p$ exists since $S$ is path-connected in $\struct {T_1, \tau_1}$. Now defi...
Let $\struct {T_1, \tau_1}, \struct {T_2, \tau_2}$ be [[Definition:Topological Space|topological spaces]]. Let $f: T_1 \to T_2$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. Let $S \subseteq T_1$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of $T_1$. Let $S$ be [[Definition:Path-Connected Set|path-conne...
Let $\map f s, \map f {s'} \in f \sqbrk S$, for some $s, s' \in S$. Let $\mathbb I$ denote the [[Definition:Closed Unit Interval|closed unit interval]]: :$\mathbb I = \closedint 0 1$ Let $p: \mathbb I \to S$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]] such that: :$\map p 0 = s, \map p 1 = s'...
Continuous Image of Path-Connected Set is Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Path-Connected_Set_is_Path-Connected
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Image_of_Path-Connected_Set_is_Path-Connected
[ "Path-Connected Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Unit Interval/Closed", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Path-Connected/Set", "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Path (Topology)" ]
proofwiki-6253
Leibniz's Rule/One Variable
Let $f$ and $g$ be real functions defined on the open interval $I$. Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a (strictly) positive integer. Let $x \in I$ be a point in $I$ at which both $f$ and $g$ are $n$ times differentiable. Then: :$\ds \paren {\map f x \map g x}^{\paren n} = \sum_{k \mathop = 0}^n \binom n k \map {f^{\paren k} } x \...
Proof by induction:
Let $f$ and $g$ be [[Definition:Real Function|real functions]] defined on the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval]] $I$. Let $n \in \Z_{>0}$ be a [[Definition:Strictly Positive Integer|(strictly) positive integer]]. Let $x \in I$ be a point in $I$ at which both $f$ and $g$ are [[Definition:Nth Derivative|$n...
Proof by [[Principle of Mathematical Induction|induction]]:
Leibniz's Rule/One Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Rule/One_Variable
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Rule/One_Variable
[ "Leibniz's Rule" ]
[ "Definition:Real Function", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Integer", "Definition:Derivative/Higher Derivatives/Higher Order", "Definition:Derivative/Higher Derivatives/Order of Derivative" ]
[ "Principle of Mathematical Induction", "Principle of Mathematical Induction" ]
proofwiki-6254
Leibniz's Rule/Real Valued Functions
Let $f, g : \R^n \to \R$ be real valued functions, $k$ times differentiable on some open set $U \subseteq \R^n$. Let $\alpha = \tuple {\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n}$ be a multiindex indexed by $\set {1, \ldots, n}$ with $\size \alpha \le k$. For $i \in \set {1, \ldots, n}$, let $\partial_i$ denote the partial derivative:...
First, inserting the definitions, the statement of the theorem reads: :$\ds \map {\partial_1^{\alpha_1} \partial_2^{\alpha_2} \cdots \partial_n^{\alpha_n} } {f g} = \sum_{\beta_1 = 0}^{\alpha_1} \cdots \sum_{\beta_n \mathop = 0}^{\alpha_n} \binom {\alpha_1} {\beta_1} \cdots \binom {\alpha_n} {\beta_n} \paren {\partial_...
Let $f, g : \R^n \to \R$ be [[Definition:Real-Valued Function|real valued functions]], [[Definition:Nth Derivative|$k$ times differentiable]] on some [[Definition:Open Set (Real Analysis)|open set]] $U \subseteq \R^n$. Let $\alpha = \tuple {\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n}$ be a [[Definition:Multiindex|multiindex]] [[Defin...
First, inserting the definitions, the statement of the theorem reads: :$\ds \map {\partial_1^{\alpha_1} \partial_2^{\alpha_2} \cdots \partial_n^{\alpha_n} } {f g} = \sum_{\beta_1 = 0}^{\alpha_1} \cdots \sum_{\beta_n \mathop = 0}^{\alpha_n} \binom {\alpha_1} {\beta_1} \cdots \binom {\alpha_n} {\beta_n} \paren {\partial...
Leibniz's Rule/Real Valued Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Rule/Real_Valued_Functions
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Leibniz's_Rule/Real_Valued_Functions
[ "Leibniz's Rule" ]
[ "Definition:Real-Valued Function", "Definition:Derivative/Higher Derivatives/Higher Order", "Definition:Open Set/Real Analysis", "Definition:Multiindex", "Definition:Indexing Set", "Definition:Partial Derivative", "Definition:Partial Differential Operator", "Definition:Function" ]
[]
proofwiki-6255
Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a topological space. Let $D$ be a doubleton endowed with the indiscrete topology. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the double pointed topology on $S$. Then $X \subseteq S \times D$ is open in $\tau$ {{iff}} for some $U \in \tau$: :$X = U \times D$
By definition, $\tau$ is the product topology on $X \times D$. That is, $\tau$ has as a basis sets of the form: :$U \times V$ with $U \in \tau$ and $V$ open in $D$. Since $D$ is endowed with the indiscrete topology, either $V = \O$ or $V = D$. In the former case, by Cartesian Product is Empty iff Factor is Empty, $U \t...
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Doubleton|doubleton]] endowed with the [[Definition:Indiscrete Topology|indiscrete topology]]. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Double Pointed Topology|double pointed topology]] on $S$. T...
By definition, $\tau$ is the [[Definition:Product Topology|product topology]] on $X \times D$. That is, $\tau$ has as a [[Definition:Basis (Topology)|basis]] sets of the form: :$U \times V$ with $U \in \tau$ and $V$ [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $D$. Since $D$ is endowed with the [[Definition:Indiscre...
Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Sets_of_Double_Pointed_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Sets_of_Double_Pointed_Topology
[ "Double Pointed Topologies" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Definition:Double Pointed Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Product Topology", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Cartesian Product is Empty iff Factor is Empty", "Definition:Basis (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Topology", "Category:Double Pointed Topologies"...
proofwiki-6256
Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology/Corollary
A subset $X \subseteq S \times D$ is closed in $\tau$ {{iff}} for some closed set $C$ of $\tau$: :$X = C \times D$
By definition, $X$ is closed {{iff}} its complement $\map \complement X$ is open. By Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology, it follows by that for some $U \in \tau$: :$\map \complement X = U \times D$ Then by Cartesian Product Distributes over Set Difference and Complement of Complement, we have that: {{improve|rather, ...
A [[Definition:Subset|subset]] $X \subseteq S \times D$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $\tau$ {{iff}} for some [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed set]] $C$ of $\tau$: :$X = C \times D$
By definition, $X$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] {{iff}} its [[Definition:Complement|complement]] $\map \complement X$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]]. By [[Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology]], it follows by that for some $U \in \tau$: :$\map \complement X = U \times D$ Then by [[Carte...
Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Sets_of_Double_Pointed_Topology/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Sets_of_Double_Pointed_Topology/Corollary
[ "Double Pointed Topologies" ]
[ "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Complement", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology", "Cartesian Product Distributes over Set Difference", "Complement of Complement", "Cartesian Product Distributes over Complement", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Cate...
proofwiki-6257
Open Set Less One Point is Open/Corollary
Let $S = \set {\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n} \subseteq U$ be a finite set of points in $U$. Then $U \setminus S$ is open in $M$.
Follows directly from Open Set Less One Point is Open and Finite Intersection of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open. Let: :$U_1 = U \setminus \set {\alpha_1}, U_2 = U \setminus \set {\alpha_2}, \ldots, U_n = U \setminus \set {\alpha_n}$ From the above, $U_1, U_2, \ldots, U_n$ are all open in $M$. From Finite Intersectio...
Let $S = \set {\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n} \subseteq U$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]] of points in $U$. Then $U \setminus S$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open]] in $M$.
Follows directly from [[Open Set Less One Point is Open]] and [[Finite Intersection of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open]]. Let: :$U_1 = U \setminus \set {\alpha_1}, U_2 = U \setminus \set {\alpha_2}, \ldots, U_n = U \setminus \set {\alpha_n}$ From the above, $U_1, U_2, \ldots, U_n$ are all [[Definition:Open Set (Met...
Open Set Less One Point is Open/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_Less_One_Point_is_Open/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_Less_One_Point_is_Open/Corollary
[ "Open Set Less One Point is Open" ]
[ "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space" ]
[ "Open Set Less One Point is Open", "Finite Intersection of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Finite Intersection of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Category:Open Set Less One Point is Open" ]
proofwiki-6258
Closed Real Interval is Neighborhood Except at Endpoints
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $\closedint a b \subset \R$ be a closed interval of $\R$. Then $\closedint a b$ is a neighborhood of all of its points except $a$ and $b$.
Let $a < c < b$. Let $\epsilon < \map \min {b - c, c - a}$. From the definition of positive it follows that $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} c = \openint {c - \epsilon} {c + \epsilon}$ be the open $\epsilon$-ball of $c$. We have that $c + \epsilon < b$ and $a < c - \epsilon$. Thus: :$\map {B_\epsilon} c \...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $\closedint a b \subset \R$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] of $\R$. Then $\closedint a b$ is a [[Definition:Neighborhood (Metric Space)|neighborhood]] of all...
Let $a < c < b$. Let $\epsilon < \map \min {b - c, c - a}$. From the definition of [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive]] it follows that $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} c = \openint {c - \epsilon} {c + \epsilon}$ be the [[Definition:Open Ball|open $\epsilon$-ball]] of $c$. We have that $c + \...
Closed Real Interval is Neighborhood Except at Endpoints
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Real_Interval_is_Neighborhood_Except_at_Endpoints
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Real_Interval_is_Neighborhood_Except_at_Endpoints
[ "Real Intervals", "Neighborhoods" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Neighborhood (Metric Space)" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Neighborhood (Metric Space)", "Definition:Neighborhood (Metric Space)" ]
proofwiki-6259
Open Real Interval is Open Set
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $\openint a b \subset \R$ be an open interval of $\R$. Then $\openint a b$ is an open set of $\R$.
Let $c \in \R$ such that $a < c < b$. Let $\epsilon = \min \set {b - c, c - a}$. From the definition of positive it follows that $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} c = \openint {c - \epsilon} {c + \epsilon}$ be the open $\epsilon$-ball of $c$. Let $y \in \map {B_\epsilon} c$. Then: :$\size {c - y} < \epsilo...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $\openint a b \subset \R$ be an [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval]] of $\R$. Then $\openint a b$ is an [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open set]] of $\R$.
Let $c \in \R$ such that $a < c < b$. Let $\epsilon = \min \set {b - c, c - a}$. From the definition of [[Definition:Positive Real Number|positive]] it follows that $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Let $\map {B_\epsilon} c = \openint {c - \epsilon} {c + \epsilon}$ be the [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open $\epsilon...
Open Real Interval is Open Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_Open_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_Open_Set
[ "Real Intervals", "Open Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Positive/Real Number", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Neighborhood (Metric Space)", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-6260
Closed Real Interval is not Open Set
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as a Euclidean space. Let $\closedint a b \subset \R$ be a closed interval of $\R$. Then $\closedint a b$ is not an open set of $\R$.
From Closed Real Interval is Neighborhood Except at Endpoints, $a$ and $b$ have no open $\epsilon$-ball lying entirely in $\closedint a b$. The result follows by definition of open set. {{qed}}
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as a [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $\closedint a b \subset \R$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] of $\R$. Then $\closedint a b$ is not an [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open set]] of $\R$.
From [[Closed Real Interval is Neighborhood Except at Endpoints]], $a$ and $b$ have no [[Definition:Open Ball|open $\epsilon$-ball]] lying entirely in $\closedint a b$. The result follows by definition of [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open set]]. {{qed}}
Closed Real Interval is not Open Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Real_Interval_is_not_Open_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Real_Interval_is_not_Open_Set
[ "Real Intervals", "Open Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space" ]
[ "Closed Real Interval is Neighborhood Except at Endpoints", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-6261
Open Set may not be Open Ball
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space. Let $U \subseteq M$ be an open set of $M$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $U$ is an open ball of some $x \in A$.
Consider the Euclidean space $\R^2$. Let: :$U \subseteq \R^2: U = \set {\tuple {x_1, x_2}: a < x_1 < b, c < x_2 < d}$ Let $x = \tuple {x_1, x_2} \in U$. Then $\map {B_\epsilon} x \subseteq U$ when $\epsilon = \min \set {x_1 - a, b - x_1, x_2 - c, d - x_2}$: :310px So by definition, $U$ is open in $M$. However, $U$ is n...
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $U \subseteq M$ be an [[Definition:Open Set of Metric Space|open set]] of $M$. Then it is not necessarily the case that $U$ is an [[Definition:Open Ball of Metric Space|open ball]] of some $x \in A$.
Consider the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]] $\R^2$. Let: :$U \subseteq \R^2: U = \set {\tuple {x_1, x_2}: a < x_1 < b, c < x_2 < d}$ Let $x = \tuple {x_1, x_2} \in U$. Then $\map {B_\epsilon} x \subseteq U$ when $\epsilon = \min \set {x_1 - a, b - x_1, x_2 - c, d - x_2}$: :[[File:NeighborhoodInOpenS...
Open Set may not be Open Ball
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_may_not_be_Open_Ball
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Set_may_not_be_Open_Ball
[ "Open Sets (Metric Spaces)", "Open Balls" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Ball" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space", "File:NeighborhoodInOpenSet.png", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Ball" ]
proofwiki-6262
Quotient Mapping is Coequalizer
Let $\mathbf{Set}$ be the category of sets. Let $S$ be a Set. Let $\RR \subseteq S \times S$ be an equivalence relation on $S$. Let $r_1, r_2: \RR \to S$ be the projections corresponding to the inclusion mapping $\RR \hookrightarrow S \times S$. Let $q: S \to S / \RR$ be the quotient mapping induced by $\RR$. Then $q$ ...
Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping as in the following commutative diagram: $\quad\quad \begin{xy}\xymatrix{ \RR \ar[r]<2pt>^*{r_1} \ar[r]<-2pt>_*{r_2} & S \ar[r]^*{q} \ar[rd]_*{f} & S / \RR \ar@{.>}[d]^*{\bar f} \\ & & T }\end{xy}$ This translates to, for $s_1, s_2 \in S$ with $s_1 \RR s_2$: :$\map {f \circ r_1} {s_1, s_...
Let $\mathbf{Set}$ be the [[Definition:Category of Sets|category of sets]]. Let $S$ be a [[Definition:Set|Set]]. Let $\RR \subseteq S \times S$ be an [[Definition:Equivalence Relation|equivalence relation]] on $S$. Let $r_1, r_2: \RR \to S$ be the [[Definition:Projection (Category Theory)|projections]] corresponding...
Let $f: S \to T$ be a [[Definition:Mapping|mapping]] as in the following [[Definition:Commutative Diagram|commutative diagram]]: $\quad\quad \begin{xy}\xymatrix{ \RR \ar[r]<2pt>^*{r_1} \ar[r]<-2pt>_*{r_2} & S \ar[r]^*{q} \ar[rd]_*{f} & S / \RR \ar@{.>}[d]^*{\bar f} \\ & & T }\end{xy}$ This translates to, for $s_1, ...
Quotient Mapping is Coequalizer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Mapping_is_Coequalizer
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Quotient_Mapping_is_Coequalizer
[ "Category of Sets", "Quotient Mappings" ]
[ "Definition:Category of Sets", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Equivalence Relation", "Definition:Product (Category Theory)/Projection", "Definition:Inclusion Mapping", "Definition:Quotient Mapping", "Definition:Coequalizer" ]
[ "Definition:Mapping", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Well-Defined/Mapping", "Definition:Unique", "Definition:Coequalizer" ]
proofwiki-6263
Closed Real Interval is Closed Set
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $\closedint a b \subset \R$ be a closed interval of $\R$. Then $\closedint a b$ is a closed set of $\R$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \closedint a b | r = \set {x \in \R: x \ge a \land x \le b} | c = {{Defof|Closed Real Interval}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \R \setminus \closedint a b | r = \R \setminus \set {x \in \R: x \ge a \land x \le b} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \set {x \in \R: x < a \lor x ...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $\closedint a b \subset \R$ be a [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] of $\R$. Then $\closedint a b$ is a [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed set]] of $\R$.
{{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \closedint a b | r = \set {x \in \R: x \ge a \land x \le b} | c = {{Defof|Closed Real Interval}} }} {{eqn | ll= \leadsto | l = \R \setminus \closedint a b | r = \R \setminus \set {x \in \R: x \ge a \land x \le b} | c = }} {{eqn | r = \set {x \in \R: x < a \lor x ...
Closed Real Interval is Closed Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Real_Interval_is_Closed_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Real_Interval_is_Closed_Set
[ "Metric Spaces", "Real Intervals", "Closed Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space" ]
[ "De Morgan's Laws (Logic)/Disjunction of Negations", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Union of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-6264
Kernel of Linear Transformation is Null Space of Matrix Representation
Let $V$ and $W$ be finite dimensional vector spaces. Let $\phi: V \to W$ be a linear transformation from $V$ to $W$. Let $\tuple {e_1, \ldots, e_n}$ and $\tuple {f_1, \ldots, f_m}$ be ordered bases of $V$ and $W$ respectively. Let $A$ be the matrix of $\phi$ in these bases. Define $f: V \to \R^n$ by: :$\ds \sum_{i \mat...
{{MissingLinks}} {{proofread|Use of injectivity of $g$ here is implicit; but I ''think'' it's still rigorous without details: second opinion welcome}} By the definition of the matrix $A$: :$A \circ f = g \circ \phi$ Therefore if $x \in \map \ker \phi$ we have: :$A \map f x = \map g {\map \phi x} = \map g 0 = 0$ This sh...
Let $V$ and $W$ be [[Definition:Finite Dimensional Vector Space|finite dimensional vector spaces]]. Let $\phi: V \to W$ be a [[Definition:Linear Transformation|linear transformation]] from $V$ to $W$. Let $\tuple {e_1, \ldots, e_n}$ and $\tuple {f_1, \ldots, f_m}$ be [[Definition:Ordered Basis|ordered bases]] of $V$ ...
{{MissingLinks}} {{proofread|Use of injectivity of $g$ here is implicit; but I ''think'' it's still rigorous without details: second opinion welcome}} By the definition of the [[Definition:Matrix|matrix]] $A$: :$A \circ f = g \circ \phi$ Therefore if $x \in \map \ker \phi$ we have: :$A \map f x = \map g {\map \phi x}...
Kernel of Linear Transformation is Null Space of Matrix Representation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Kernel_of_Linear_Transformation_is_Null_Space_of_Matrix_Representation
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Kernel_of_Linear_Transformation_is_Null_Space_of_Matrix_Representation
[ "Kernels of Linear Transformations", "Null Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Dimension of Vector Space/Finite", "Definition:Linear Transformation", "Definition:Ordered Basis", "Definition:Relative Matrix of Linear Transformation", "Definition:Null Space", "Definition:Kernel of Linear Transformation", "Definition:Image (Set Theory)/Mapping/Subset", "Definition:Subse...
[ "Definition:Matrix", "Category:Kernels of Linear Transformations", "Category:Null Spaces" ]
proofwiki-6265
Half-Open Real Interval is neither Open nor Closed
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $\hointr a b \subset \R$ be a right half-open interval of $\R$. Then $\hointr a b$ is neither an open set nor a closed set of $\R$. Similarly, the left half-open interval $\hointl a b \subset \R$ is neither an open set nor a closed set of $\R$.
From Half-Open Real Interval is not Open Set we have that neither $\hointr a b$ nor $\hointl a b$ is an open set of $\R$. From Half-Open Real Interval is not Closed in Real Number Line we have that neither $\hointr a b$ nor $\hointl a b$ is a closed set of $\R$. {{qed}}
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $\hointr a b \subset \R$ be a [[Definition:Right Half-Open Real Interval|right half-open interval]] of $\R$. Then $\hointr a b$ is neither an [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open...
From [[Half-Open Real Interval is not Open Set]] we have that neither $\hointr a b$ nor $\hointl a b$ is an [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open set]] of $\R$. From [[Half-Open Real Interval is not Closed in Real Number Line]] we have that neither $\hointr a b$ nor $\hointl a b$ is a [[Definition:Closed Set (Metr...
Half-Open Real Interval is neither Open nor Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Half-Open_Real_Interval_is_neither_Open_nor_Closed
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Half-Open_Real_Interval_is_neither_Open_nor_Closed
[ "Real Intervals", "Open Sets", "Closed Sets" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Half-Open/Right", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Half-Open/Left", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Sp...
[ "Half-Open Real Interval is not Open Set", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Half-Open Real Interval is not Closed in Real Number Line", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-6266
Compact Sets of Double Pointed Topology
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a topological space. Let $D$ be a doubleton endowed with the indiscrete topology. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the double pointed topology on $S$. Then $X \subseteq S \times D$ is compact in $\tau$ {{iff}} for some compact set $C$ of $\tau_S$: :$\map {\pr_1} X = C$ where $\pr_1$ deno...
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $X \subseteq S \times D$ is a compact set in $\vartheta$. It is to be shown that $C = \map {\pr_1} X$ is compact in $\tau$. This follows from Compactness Properties Preserved under Projection Mapping. {{qed|lemma}}
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Doubleton|doubleton]] endowed with the [[Definition:Indiscrete Topology|indiscrete topology]]. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Double Pointed Topology|double pointed topology]] on $S$. T...
=== Necessary Condition === Suppose that $X \subseteq S \times D$ is a [[Definition:Compact Set (Topology)|compact set]] in $\vartheta$. It is to be shown that $C = \map {\pr_1} X$ is [[Definition:Compact Set (Topology)|compact]] in $\tau$. This follows from [[Compactness Properties Preserved under Projection Mappin...
Compact Sets of Double Pointed Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Sets_of_Double_Pointed_Topology
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Sets_of_Double_Pointed_Topology
[ "Double Pointed Topologies" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Definition:Double Pointed Topology", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/First Projection" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Compactness Properties Preserved under Projection Mapping", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace" ]
proofwiki-6267
Closure of Subset of Double Pointed Topological Space
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a topological space. Let $D$ be a doubleton endowed with the indiscrete topology. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the double pointed topology on $S$. Let $X \subseteq S \times D$ be a subset of $S \times D$. Then the closure of $X$ in $\tau$ is: :$\map \cl X = \map \cl {\map {\pr_1} X} ...
By Closed Sets of Double Pointed Topology, $\map \cl {\map {\pr_1} X} \times D$ is closed in $\tau$. Furthermore, for $\tuple {s, d} \in X$, one has: :$s \in \map {\pr_1} X \subseteq \map \cl {\map {\pr_1} X}$ by definition of closure. Since also $d \in D$, we conclude that: :$X \subseteq \map \cl {\map {\pr_1} X} \tim...
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Doubleton|doubleton]] endowed with the [[Definition:Indiscrete Topology|indiscrete topology]]. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Double Pointed Topology|double pointed topology]] on $S$. Le...
By [[Closed Sets of Double Pointed Topology]], $\map \cl {\map {\pr_1} X} \times D$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] in $\tau$. Furthermore, for $\tuple {s, d} \in X$, one has: :$s \in \map {\pr_1} X \subseteq \map \cl {\map {\pr_1} X}$ by definition of [[Definition:Closure (Topology)|closure]]. Since...
Closure of Subset of Double Pointed Topological Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Subset_of_Double_Pointed_Topological_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closure_of_Subset_of_Double_Pointed_Topological_Space
[ "Double Pointed Topologies", "Set Closures" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Definition:Double Pointed Topology", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/First Projection" ]
[ "Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology/Corollary", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closure (Topology)", "Equivalence of Definitions of Closure of Topological Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology/Corollary", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "I...
proofwiki-6268
Interior of Subset of Double Pointed Topological Space
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a topological space. Let $D$ be a doubleton endowed with the indiscrete topology. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the double pointed topology on $S$. Let $X \subseteq S \times D$ be a subset of $S \times D$. Define $A \subseteq S$ by: :$A := \set {s \in S: \paren {\forall d \in D: \tupl...
By Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology, $X^\circ$ must be of the form: :$X^\circ = U \times D$ with $U$ open in $\tau_S$. By Set Interior is Largest Open Set, we have for any open set $U' \times D$ of $\tau$ that: :$U' \times D \subseteq X \iff U' \times D \subseteq X^\circ = U \times D$ By Cartesian Product of Subset...
Let $\struct {S, \tau_S}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $D$ be a [[Definition:Doubleton|doubleton]] endowed with the [[Definition:Indiscrete Topology|indiscrete topology]]. Let $\struct {S \times D, \tau}$ be the [[Definition:Double Pointed Topology|double pointed topology]] on $S$. Le...
By [[Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology]], $X^\circ$ must be of the form: :$X^\circ = U \times D$ with $U$ [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $\tau_S$. By [[Set Interior is Largest Open Set]], we have for any [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open set]] $U' \times D$ of $\tau$ that: :$U' \times D \subsete...
Interior of Subset of Double Pointed Topological Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_of_Subset_of_Double_Pointed_Topological_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_of_Subset_of_Double_Pointed_Topological_Space
[ "Double Pointed Topologies", "Examples of Set Interiors" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Doubleton", "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Definition:Double Pointed Topology", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Interior (Topology)" ]
[ "Open Sets of Double Pointed Topology", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Equivalence of Definitions of Interior (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Cartesian Product of Subsets", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Equivalence of Def...
proofwiki-6269
Cartesian Product with Complement
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets. Let $A \subseteq S$ and $B \subseteq T$ be subsets of $S$ and $T$, respectively. Let $\relcomp S A$ denote the relative complement of $A$ in $S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S A \times T | r = \relcomp {S \times T} {A \times T} }} {{eqn | l = S \times \relcomp T B | r ...
By definition of relative complement we have: :$\relcomp S A = S \setminus A$ where $S \setminus A$ denotes set difference. By Cartesian Product Distributes over Set Difference, we have: :$\paren {S \setminus A} \times T = \paren {S \times T} \setminus \paren {A \times T}$ and the latter equals $\relcomp {S \times T} {...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Set|sets]]. Let $A \subseteq S$ and $B \subseteq T$ be [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$ and $T$, respectively. Let $\relcomp S A$ denote the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] of $A$ in $S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \relcomp S A \times T | r = \...
By definition of [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] we have: :$\relcomp S A = S \setminus A$ where $S \setminus A$ denotes [[Definition:Set Difference|set difference]]. By [[Cartesian Product Distributes over Set Difference]], we have: :$\paren {S \setminus A} \times T = \paren {S \times T} \set...
Cartesian Product with Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cartesian_Product_with_Complement
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cartesian_Product_with_Complement
[ "Cartesian Product", "Set Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Relative Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Set Difference", "Cartesian Product Distributes over Set Difference", "Category:Cartesian Product", "Category:Set Complement" ]
proofwiki-6270
Projection of Complement Contains Complement of Projection
Let $S$ and $T$ be non-empty sets. Let $X \subseteq S \times T$ be a subset of the Cartesian product $S \times T$. Denote with $\pr_1, \pr_2$ and $\complement$ the first and second projections, and the complement operation, respectively. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn|l = \map \complement {\map {\pr_1} X} |o = \subsete...
Let $s \in S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn|l = s |o = \in |r = \map \complement {\map {\pr_1} X} }} {{eqn|ll= \leadstoandfrom |l = s |o = \notin |r = \map {\pr_1} X |c = {{Defof|Set Complement}} }} {{eqn|ll= \leadstoandfrom |q = \forall t \in T |l = \tuple {s, t} |o = \notin ...
Let $S$ and $T$ be [[Definition:Non-Empty Set|non-empty sets]]. Let $X \subseteq S \times T$ be a [[Definition:Subset|subset]] of the [[Definition:Cartesian Product|Cartesian product]] $S \times T$. Denote with $\pr_1, \pr_2$ and $\complement$ the [[Definition:First Projection|first]] and [[Definition:Second Projecti...
Let $s \in S$. Then: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn|l = s |o = \in |r = \map \complement {\map {\pr_1} X} }} {{eqn|ll= \leadstoandfrom |l = s |o = \notin |r = \map {\pr_1} X |c = {{Defof|Set Complement}} }} {{eqn|ll= \leadstoandfrom |q = \forall t \in T |l = \tuple {s, t} |o = \notin...
Projection of Complement Contains Complement of Projection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_of_Complement_Contains_Complement_of_Projection
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Projection_of_Complement_Contains_Complement_of_Projection
[ "Projections", "Set Complement" ]
[ "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Cartesian Product", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/First Projection", "Definition:Projection (Mapping Theory)/Second Projection", "Definition:Set Complement" ]
[ "Universal Instantiation", "Existential Generalisation", "Definition:Subset", "Category:Projections", "Category:Set Complement" ]
proofwiki-6271
Interior of Subset
Let $\left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a topological space. Let $X$ and $Y$ be subsets of $S$, and suppose that $X \subseteq Y$. Then: :$X^\circ \subseteq Y^\circ$ where $X^\circ$ denotes the interior of $X$.
By definition of interior, $X^\circ$ is open in $\tau$, and: :$Y^\circ \subseteq Y$ Hence, by Subset Relation is Transitive: :$X^\circ \subseteq Y$ is an open set contained in $Y$. The result follows by Set Interior is Largest Open Set. {{qed}} Category:Subsets Category:Set Interiors rh05xi8umelkm4d6icp3t0sg58yibbu
Let $\left({S, \tau}\right)$ be a [[Definition:Topological Space|topological space]]. Let $X$ and $Y$ be [[Definition:Subset|subsets]] of $S$, and suppose that $X \subseteq Y$. Then: :$X^\circ \subseteq Y^\circ$ where $X^\circ$ denotes the [[Definition:Interior (Topology)|interior]] of $X$.
By definition of [[Definition:Interior (Topology)|interior]], $X^\circ$ is [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open]] in $\tau$, and: :$Y^\circ \subseteq Y$ Hence, by [[Subset Relation is Transitive]]: :$X^\circ \subseteq Y$ is an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open set]] contained in $Y$. The result follows by [[...
Interior of Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_of_Subset
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Interior_of_Subset
[ "Subsets", "Set Interiors" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Space", "Definition:Subset", "Definition:Interior (Topology)" ]
[ "Definition:Interior (Topology)", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Subset Relation is Transitive", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Equivalence of Definitions of Interior (Topology)", "Category:Subsets", "Category:Set Interiors" ]
proofwiki-6272
Real Interval is Bounded in Real Numbers
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $a, b \in \R$. Let $\II$ be one of the following real intervals: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \openint a b | o = := | r = \set {x \in \R: a < x < b} | c = Open Real Interval }} {{eqn | l = \hointr a b | o = := | r = \set {...
Consider the open $\epsilon$-ball $\map {B_\epsilon} a$ where $\epsilon = b + 1 - a$. As $b \ge a$ we have that $b + 1 > a$ and so $\epsilon > 0$. Let $x \in \II$. Then, whatever type of real interval $\II$ actually is, $z \ge a$ and $x \le b$. As $\epsilon > 0$ it follows that $x > a - \epsilon$. Also: {{begin-eqn}} {...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $a, b \in \R$. Let $\II$ be one of the following [[Definition:Real Interval|real intervals]]: {{begin-eqn}} {{eqn | l = \openint a b | o = := | r = \set {x \in \R: a < x <...
Consider the [[Definition:Open Ball|open $\epsilon$-ball]] $\map {B_\epsilon} a$ where $\epsilon = b + 1 - a$. As $b \ge a$ we have that $b + 1 > a$ and so $\epsilon > 0$. Let $x \in \II$. Then, whatever type of [[Definition:Real Interval|real interval]] $\II$ actually is, $z \ge a$ and $x \le b$. As $\epsilon > 0...
Real Interval is Bounded in Real Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Interval_is_Bounded_in_Real_Numbers
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Real_Interval_is_Bounded_in_Real_Numbers
[ "Real Intervals" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Real Interval/Half-Open/Right", "Definition:Real Interval/Half-Open/Left", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Real Interval", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-6273
Set of Integers is not Bounded
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. The set $\Z$ of integers is not bounded in $\R$.
Let $a \in \R$. Let $K \in \R_{>0}$. Consider the open $K$-ball $\map {B_K} a$. By the Axiom of Archimedes there exists $n \in \N$ such that $n > a + K$. As $\N \subseteq \Z$: :$\exists n \in \Z: a + K < n$ and so: :$n \notin \map {B_K} a$ As this applies whatever $a$ and $K$ are, it follows that there is no $\map {B_K...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. The set $\Z$ of [[Definition:Integer|integers]] is not [[Definition:Bounded Space|bounded]] in $\R$.
Let $a \in \R$. Let $K \in \R_{>0}$. Consider the [[Definition:Open Ball|open $K$-ball]] $\map {B_K} a$. By the [[Axiom of Archimedes]] there exists $n \in \N$ such that $n > a + K$. As $\N \subseteq \Z$: :$\exists n \in \Z: a + K < n$ and so: :$n \notin \map {B_K} a$ As this applies whatever $a$ and $K$ are, it f...
Set of Integers is not Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Integers_is_not_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Integers_is_not_Bounded
[ "Real Analysis", "Boundedness" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Open Ball", "Axiom of Archimedes", "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
proofwiki-6274
Open Real Interval is not Closed Set/Corollary
Let: :$I_a = \openint \gets a$ :$I_b = \openint b \to$ be unbounded open real intervals. Then neither $I_a$ nor $I_b$ are closed sets of $\R$.
Consider the relative complement of $I_a$ in $\R$: :$J = \relcomp \R I = \R \setminus I = \hointr a \to$ Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Consider the open $\epsilon$-ball $\map {B_\epsilon} a$. Whatever the value of $\epsilon$ is, $a - \epsilon$ is not in $\map {B_\epsilon} a$. So, by definition, $J$ is not an open set of ...
Let: :$I_a = \openint \gets a$ :$I_b = \openint b \to$ be [[Definition:Unbounded Open Real Interval|unbounded open real intervals]]. Then neither $I_a$ nor $I_b$ are [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed sets]] of $\R$.
Consider the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] of $I_a$ in $\R$: :$J = \relcomp \R I = \R \setminus I = \hointr a \to$ Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Consider the [[Definition:Open Ball|open $\epsilon$-ball]] $\map {B_\epsilon} a$. Whatever the value of $\epsilon$ is, $a - \epsilon$ is not in $\map...
Open Real Interval is not Closed Set/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_not_Closed_Set/Corollary
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_not_Closed_Set/Corollary
[ "Real Intervals", "Real Number Line with Euclidean Metric" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Unbounded Open", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Relative Complement of Relative Complement", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Category:Real Intervals", "Category:Real Number Line with Euclidean Metric" ]
proofwiki-6275
Open Real Interval is not Closed Set
Let $\R$ be the real number line with the usual (Euclidean) metric. Let $I = \openint a b$ be an open real interval. Then $I$ is not a closed set of $\R$.
Consider the relative complement of $I$ in $\R$: :$J = \relcomp \R I = \R \setminus I = \hointl \gets a \cup \hointr b \to$ Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Consider the open $\epsilon$-ball $\map {B_\epsilon} a$. Whatever the value of $\epsilon$ is, $a + \epsilon$ is not in $\map {B_\epsilon} a$. So, by definition, $J$ is ...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line with Euclidean Metric|real number line with the usual (Euclidean) metric]]. Let $I = \openint a b$ be an [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open real interval]]. Then $I$ is not a [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed set]] of $\R$.
Consider the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement]] of $I$ in $\R$: :$J = \relcomp \R I = \R \setminus I = \hointl \gets a \cup \hointr b \to$ Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Consider the [[Definition:Open Ball|open $\epsilon$-ball]] $\map {B_\epsilon} a$. Whatever the value of $\epsilon$ is, $a + \epsil...
Open Real Interval is not Closed Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_not_Closed_Set
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_not_Closed_Set
[ "Real Intervals", "Real Number Line with Euclidean Metric" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Metric/Real Number Line", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space" ]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Relative Complement of Relative Complement", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Category:Real Intervals", "Category:Real Number Line with Euclidean Metric" ]
proofwiki-6276
Open Real Interval is not Compact
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $I = \openint a b$ be an open real interval. Then $I$ is not compact.
It suffices to demonstrate this for a particular open interval: we use $\openint 0 1$. Consider the set of open intervals $\openint {\dfrac 1 n} 1$ for all $n \in \Z_{>1}$. Each of these is an open set in $\openint 0 1$. Also: :$\openint 0 1 = \ds \bigcup_{n \mathop \ge 2} \openint {\dfrac 1 n} 1$ Thus $\ds \bigcup_{n ...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $I = \openint a b$ be an [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open real interval]]. Then $I$ is not [[Definition:Compact (Real Analysis)|compact]].
It suffices to demonstrate this for a particular [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval]]: we use $\openint 0 1$. Consider the [[Definition:Set|set]] of [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open intervals]] $\openint {\dfrac 1 n} 1$ for all $n \in \Z_{>1}$. Each of these is an [[Definition:Open Set (Topology)|open ...
Open Real Interval is not Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_not_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Open_Real_Interval_is_not_Compact/Proof_2
[ "Open Real Interval is not Compact", "Real Intervals", "Examples of Compact Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Compact Space/Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Set", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Definition:Open Set/Topology", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Cover of Set" ]
proofwiki-6277
Set of Integers is not Compact
Let $\Z$ be the set of integers. Then $\Z$ is not compact.
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. From Set of Integers is not Bounded, $\Z$ is not bounded in $\R$. The result follows by definition of compact. {{qed}}
Let $\Z$ be the [[Definition:Integer|set of integers]]. Then $\Z$ is not [[Definition:Compact (Real Analysis)|compact]].
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. From [[Set of Integers is not Bounded]], $\Z$ is not [[Definition:Bounded Space|bounded]] in $\R$. The result follows by definition of [[Definition:Compact (Real Analysis)|compact]]. {{qed...
Set of Integers is not Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Integers_is_not_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Set_of_Integers_is_not_Compact
[ "Integers", "Compact Spaces (Real Analysis)" ]
[ "Definition:Integer", "Definition:Compact Space/Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Set of Integers is not Bounded", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Real Analysis" ]
proofwiki-6278
Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space
Let $n \in \N_{> 0}$. Let $C$ be a subspace of the Euclidean space $\R^n$. Then $C$ is closed and bounded {{iff}} it is compact.
=== Necessary Condition === {{:Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space/Necessary Condition}}{{qed|lemma}}
Let $n \in \N_{> 0}$. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]] $\R^n$. Then $C$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]] {{iff}} it is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]].
=== [[Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space/Necessary Condition|Necessary Condition]] === {{:Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space/Necessary Condition}}{{qed|lemma}}
Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Euclidean_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Euclidean_Space
[ "Heine-Borel Theorem", "Real Euclidean Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space" ]
[ "Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space/Necessary Condition" ]
proofwiki-6279
Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space
Let $n \in \N_{> 0}$. Let $C$ be a subspace of the Euclidean space $\R^n$. Then $C$ is closed and bounded {{iff}} it is compact.
Let $C \subseteq \R^n$ be closed and bounded. Since $C$ is bounded, $C \subseteq \closedint a b^n = B$ for some $a, b \in \R$. By the Heine-Borel Theorem: Real Line and by Topological Product of Compact Spaces, it follows that $B$ is compact. From Euclidean Topology is Product Topology, it follows that $B$ is compact i...
Let $n \in \N_{> 0}$. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]] $\R^n$. Then $C$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]] {{iff}} it is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]].
Let $C \subseteq \R^n$ be [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]]. Since $C$ is [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]], $C \subseteq \closedint a b^n = B$ for some $a, b \in \R$. By the [[Heine-Borel Theorem/Real Line|Heine-Borel Theorem: Real Line]] and by [[T...
Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space/Necessary Condition/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Euclidean_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Euclidean_Space/Necessary_Condition/Proof_1
[ "Heine-Borel Theorem", "Real Euclidean Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Heine-Borel Theorem/Real Line", "Topological Product of Compact Spaces", "Definition:Compact Space/Euclidean Space", "Euclidean Topology is Product Topology", "Definition:Compact Space/Euclidean Sp...
proofwiki-6280
Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space
Let $n \in \N_{> 0}$. Let $C$ be a subspace of the Euclidean space $\R^n$. Then $C$ is closed and bounded {{iff}} it is compact.
The proof holds for $n = 1$, as follows. Suppose $C$ is a closed, bounded subspace of $\R$. Then $C \subseteq \closedint a b$ for some $a, b \in \R$. Moreover, $C$ is closed in $\closedint a b$ by {{Corollary|Closed Set in Topological Subspace}}. Hence $C$ is compact, by Closed Subspace of Compact Space is Compact. Now...
Let $n \in \N_{> 0}$. Let $C$ be a [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]] $\R^n$. Then $C$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]] {{iff}} it is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]].
The proof holds for $n = 1$, as follows. Suppose $C$ is a [[Definition:Closed Set (Topology)|closed]], [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]] [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $\R$. Then $C \subseteq \closedint a b$ for some $a, b \in \R$. Moreover, $C$ is [[Definition:Closed Interval|closed]] in ...
Heine-Borel Theorem/Euclidean Space/Necessary Condition/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Euclidean_Space
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Heine-Borel_Theorem/Euclidean_Space/Necessary_Condition/Proof_2
[ "Heine-Borel Theorem", "Real Euclidean Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Definition:Interval/Ordered Set/Closed", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Closed Subspace of Compact Space is Compact", "Definition:Interval/Ordered Set/Closed", "Definition:Bounde...
proofwiki-6281
Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a compact topological space. Let $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \, } }$ be a normed vector space. Let $f: X \to Y$ be a continuous mapping. Then $f$ is bounded.
{{AimForCont}} $f$ is not bounded. Let $g : X \to \R$ be defined by: :$\map g x = \norm {\map f x}$ From Norm is Continuous and Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous, it follows that $g$ is continuous. For all $n \in \N$, set $A_n := g^{-1} \sqbrk {\map {B_n} 0}$, where $\map {B_n} 0$ denotes the open ball in ...
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact topological space]]. Let $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \, } }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $f: X \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Bound...
{{AimForCont}} $f$ is not [[Definition:Bounded Mapping|bounded]]. Let $g : X \to \R$ be defined by: :$\map g x = \norm {\map f x}$ From [[Norm is Continuous]] and [[Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous]], it follows that $g$ is [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous]]. For all $n \in \N$, se...
Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Space_is_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Space_is_Bounded/Proof_1
[ "Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded", "Continuous Functions", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Bounded Mapping" ]
[ "Definition:Bounded Mapping", "Norm is Continuous", "Composite of Continuous Mappings is Continuous", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Open Ball/Real Analysis", "Definition:Open Ball/Radius", "Definition:Open Ball/Center", "Open Ball is Open Set/Normed Vector Space", "Definiti...
proofwiki-6282
Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a compact topological space. Let $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \, } }$ be a normed vector space. Let $f: X \to Y$ be a continuous mapping. Then $f$ is bounded.
From Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact, $f \sqbrk X$ is a compact subset of $Y$. From Compact Subset of Normed Vector Space is Closed and Bounded, $f \sqbrk X$ is bounded. Hence there exists a real number $M > 0$ such that: :$\norm {\map f x} \le M$ for all $x \in X$. So $f$ is bounded. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {X, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact topological space]]. Let $\struct {Y, \norm {\, \cdot \, } }$ be a [[Definition:Normed Vector Space|normed vector space]]. Let $f: X \to Y$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)|continuous mapping]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Bound...
From [[Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact]], $f \sqbrk X$ is a [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact subset]] of $Y$. From [[Compact Subset of Normed Vector Space is Closed and Bounded]], $f \sqbrk X$ is [[Definition:Bounded Subset of Normed Vector Space|bounded]]. Hence there exists a [[Definitio...
Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Space_is_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Space_is_Bounded/Proof_2
[ "Continuous Function on Compact Space is Bounded", "Continuous Functions", "Compact Topological Spaces", "Normed Vector Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Topology)", "Definition:Bounded Mapping" ]
[ "Continuous Image of Compact Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Compact Subset of Normed Vector Space is Closed and Bounded", "Definition:Bounded Subset of Normed Vector Space", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Bounded Mapping" ]
proofwiki-6283
Continuous Function on Compact Space is Uniformly Continuous
Let $\R^n$ be the $n$-dimensional Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R^n$ be a compact subspace of $\R^n$. Let $f: S \to \R$ be a continuous function. Then $f$ is uniformly continuous on $S$.
{{ProofWanted|Use Heine-Cantor Theorem}}
Let $\R^n$ be the [[Definition:Euclidean Space|$n$-dimensional Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R^n$ be a [[Definition:Compact (Real Analysis)|compact subspace]] of $\R^n$. Let $f: S \to \R$ be a [[Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Spaces)|continuous function]]. Then $f$ is [[Definition:Uniformly Continuous...
{{ProofWanted|Use [[Heine-Cantor Theorem]]}}
Continuous Function on Compact Space is Uniformly Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Space_is_Uniformly_Continuous
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Continuous_Function_on_Compact_Space_is_Uniformly_Continuous
[ "Continuous Functions", "Uniformly Continuous Functions" ]
[ "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Real Analysis", "Definition:Continuous Mapping (Metric Space)", "Definition:Uniform Continuity/Metric Space" ]
[ "Heine-Cantor Theorem" ]
proofwiki-6284
T2 Space is Noetherian iff Finite
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a $T_2$ (Hausdorff) space. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is Noetherian {{iff}} $S$ is finite.
=== Necessary Condition === Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be Noetherian. {{Recall|Noetherian Topological Space|Noetherian topological space|index = 5}} {{:Definition:Noetherian Topological Space/Definition 5}} Let $H \subseteq S$ be a subspace of $\struct {S, \tau}$. From Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed, $H$ is...
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a [[Definition:T2 Space|$T_2$ (Hausdorff) space]]. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is [[Definition:Noetherian Topological Space|Noetherian]] {{iff}} $S$ is [[Definition:Finite Set|finite]].
=== Necessary Condition === Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be [[Definition:Noetherian Topological Space|Noetherian]]. {{Recall|Noetherian Topological Space|Noetherian topological space|index = 5}} {{:Definition:Noetherian Topological Space/Definition 5}} Let $H \subseteq S$ be a [[Definition:Subspace|subspace]] of $\struct...
T2 Space is Noetherian iff Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T2_Space_is_Noetherian_iff_Finite
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/T2_Space_is_Noetherian_iff_Finite
[ "Hausdorff Spaces", "Finite Topological Spaces", "Noetherian Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:T2 Space", "Definition:Noetherian Topological Space", "Definition:Finite Set" ]
[ "Definition:Noetherian Topological Space", "Definition:Subspace", "Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Closed Set/Topology", "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Discrete Topology", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Discrete Spa...
proofwiki-6285
Indiscrete Space is Noetherian
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be an indiscrete topological space. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is Noetherian.
Let $\struct {H, \tau_H}$ be a subspace of $T$. From Subset of Indiscrete Space is Compact, $\struct {H, \tau_H}$ is compact. The result follows by definition of Noetherian topological space. {{qed}}
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be an [[Definition:Indiscrete Space|indiscrete topological space]]. Then $\struct {S, \tau}$ is [[Definition:Noetherian Topological Space|Noetherian]].
Let $\struct {H, \tau_H}$ be a [[Definition:Topological Subspace|subspace]] of $T$. From [[Subset of Indiscrete Space is Compact]], $\struct {H, \tau_H}$ is [[Definition:Compact Topological Space|compact]]. The result follows by definition of [[Definition:Noetherian Topological Space|Noetherian topological space]]. {...
Indiscrete Space is Noetherian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indiscrete_Space_is_Noetherian
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Indiscrete_Space_is_Noetherian
[ "Indiscrete Topology", "Examples of Noetherian Topological Spaces" ]
[ "Definition:Indiscrete Topology", "Definition:Noetherian Topological Space" ]
[ "Definition:Topological Subspace", "Subset of Indiscrete Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Topological Space", "Definition:Noetherian Topological Space" ]
proofwiki-6286
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space. Let $M$ be complete and totally bounded. Then $M$ is sequentially compact.
Let $\sequence {x_m}_{m \mathop \in \N}$ be an infinite sequence in $A$. By the definition of a totally bounded metric space, we can use the {{Axiom-link|Countable Choice}} to obtain a sequence $\sequence {F_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ such that: :For all $n \in \N$, $F_n$ is a finite $2^{-n}$-net for $M$. For all $n \in \N...
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $M$ be [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]] and [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded]]. Then $M$ is [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]].
Let $\sequence {x_m}_{m \mathop \in \N}$ be an [[Definition:Infinite Sequence|infinite sequence]] in $A$. By the definition of a [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded]] [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]], we can use the {{Axiom-link|Countable Choice}} to obtain a [[Definition:Sequence|sequen...
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact/Proof_1
[ "Complete Metric Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces", "Totally Bounded Metric Spaces", "Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Sequence", "Definition:Epsilon-Net/Finite Net", "Definition:Epsilon-Net", "Definition:Infinite Set", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Non-Empty Set", "Definition:Infinite ...
proofwiki-6287
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space. Let $M$ be complete and totally bounded. Then $M$ is sequentially compact.
The results: :Compact Space is Countably Compact :Countably Compact Metric Space is Sequentially Compact show that it suffices to prove that $M$ is compact. {{AimForCont}} that $M$ is not compact. Let $\CC$ be an open cover for $A$ such that $\CC$ does not have a finite subcover for $A$. By the definition of a totally ...
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $M$ be [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]] and [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded]]. Then $M$ is [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]].
The results: :[[Compact Space is Countably Compact]] :[[Countably Compact Metric Space is Sequentially Compact]] show that it suffices to prove that $M$ is [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]]. {{AimForCont}} that $M$ is not [[Definition:Compact Metric Space|compact]]. Let $\CC$ be an [[Definition:Open Cover|...
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact/Proof_2
[ "Complete Metric Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces", "Totally Bounded Metric Spaces", "Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space" ]
[ "Compact Space is Countably Compact", "Countably Compact Metric Space is Sequentially Compact", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Space/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover/Finite", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Metric Space",...
proofwiki-6288
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space. Let $M$ be complete and totally bounded. Then $M$ is sequentially compact.
Let $M$ be both complete and totally bounded. Let $\sequence {a_k}$ be any infinite sequence in $A$. Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X$ be a finite set of points such that: :$\ds A = \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n \map {B_\epsilon} {x_i}$ where $\map {B_\epsilon} {x_i}$ represents the open $\epsilon$-b...
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $M$ be [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]] and [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded]]. Then $M$ is [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]].
Let $M$ be both [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]] and [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded]]. Let $\sequence {a_k}$ be any [[Definition:Infinite Sequence|infinite sequence]] in $A$. Let $\epsilon \in \R_{>0}$. Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X$ be a [[Definition:Finite Set|finite set]] of ...
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact/Proof_3
[ "Complete Metric Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces", "Totally Bounded Metric Spaces", "Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space" ]
[ "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Open Ball", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Axiom:Axiom of Countable Choice", "Axiom:Axiom...
proofwiki-6289
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a metric space. Let $M$ be complete and totally bounded. Then $M$ is sequentially compact.
We use the following {{Lemma|Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact}}, which depends on the {{Axiom-link|Countable Choice}}. === Lemma === {{:Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Lemma}}{{qed|lemma}} Let $\sequence {x_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a sequence in $A$. I...
Let $M = \struct {A, d}$ be a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]]. Let $M$ be [[Definition:Complete Metric Space|complete]] and [[Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space|totally bounded]]. Then $M$ is [[Definition:Sequentially Compact Space|sequentially compact]].
We use the following {{Lemma|Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact}}, which depends on the {{Axiom-link|Countable Choice}}. === [[Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Lemma|Lemma]] === {{:Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Lemma}}{...
Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Proof 4
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Complete_and_Totally_Bounded_Metric_Space_is_Sequentially_Compact/Proof_4
[ "Complete Metric Spaces", "Sequentially Compact Spaces", "Totally Bounded Metric Spaces", "Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact" ]
[ "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Complete Metric Space", "Definition:Totally Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Sequentially Compact Space" ]
[ "Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Lemma", "Definition:Sequence/Infinite Sequence", "Definition:Recursively Defined Mapping/Natural Numbers", "Definition:Subsequence", "Complete and Totally Bounded Metric Space is Sequentially Compact/Lemma", "Definition:Subsequence", "De...
proofwiki-6290
Closed Bounded Subset of Real Numbers is Compact
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a closed and bounded subspace of $\R$. Then $S$ is compact in $\R$.
A closed and bounded subspace $S$ of $\R$ is a closed subspace of some closed real interval $\closedint a b$. From Closed Subspace of Compact Space is Compact, it suffices to prove that $\closedint a b$ is compact. Let $\UU$ be any open cover of $\closedint a b$. Let: :$G = \set {x \in \R: x \ge a, \closedint a x \text...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]] [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of [[Definition:Real Number...
A [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]] [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] $S$ of $\R$ is a [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of some [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed real interval]] $\closedint ...
Closed Bounded Subset of Real Numbers is Compact/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Bounded_Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Bounded_Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Compact/Proof_1
[ "Closed Bounded Subset of Real Numbers is Compact", "Euclidean Spaces", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Closed Subspace of Compact Space is Compact", "Definition:Compact Space/Real Analysis", "Defi...
proofwiki-6291
Closed Bounded Subset of Real Numbers is Compact
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as an Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a closed and bounded subspace of $\R$. Then $S$ is compact in $\R$.
Let $S$ be closed and bounded. As $S$ is bounded, there exist some $a, b \in \R$ such that: :$S \subseteq \openint a b$ where $\openint a b$ is the open interval between $a$ and $b$. It follows that $S \subseteq \closedint a b$. Consider the set: :$U = \relcomp \R S \cap \openint {a - 1} {b + 1}$ By inspection it can b...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be a [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]] [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of [[Definition:Real Number...
Let $S$ be [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] and [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]]. As $S$ is [[Definition:Bounded Metric Space|bounded]], there exist some $a, b \in \R$ such that: :$S \subseteq \openint a b$ where $\openint a b$ is the [[Definition:Open Real Interval|open interval]] between $a...
Closed Bounded Subset of Real Numbers is Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Bounded_Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Closed_Bounded_Subset_of_Real_Numbers_is_Compact/Proof_2
[ "Closed Bounded Subset of Real Numbers is Compact", "Euclidean Spaces", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace" ]
[ "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space", "Definition:Real Interval/Open", "Union of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Subcover/Finite...
proofwiki-6292
Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact
Let $\R$ be the set of real numbers considered as an Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be non-closed in $\R$. Then $S$ is not a compact subspace of $\R$.
Consider the complement of $S$ in $\R$: :$S' = \relcomp \R S = \R \setminus S$ As $S$ is not closed, by definition $S'$ is not open. Thus by definition there exists $x \in S'$ such that: :$\forall \epsilon \in \R_{>0}: \map {B_\epsilon} x \notin S'$ where $\map {B_\epsilon} x$ denotes the open $\epsilon$-ball of $x$. T...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number|set of real numbers]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be non-[[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] in $\R$. Then $S$ is not a [[Definition:Compact Subspace|compact subspace]] of $\R$.
Consider the [[Definition:Relative Complement|complement of $S$ in $\R$]]: :$S' = \relcomp \R S = \R \setminus S$ As $S$ is not [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]], by definition $S'$ is not [[Definition:Open Set (Metric Space)|open]]. Thus by definition there exists $x \in S'$ such that: :$\forall \epsi...
Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Closed_Set_of_Real_Numbers_is_not_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Closed_Set_of_Real_Numbers_is_not_Compact/Proof_1
[ "Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact", "Compact Spaces (Real Analysis)", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace" ]
[ "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Ball", "Union of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definition:Finite Set", "Definition:Open Cover", "Definiti...
proofwiki-6293
Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact
Let $\R$ be the set of real numbers considered as an Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be non-closed in $\R$. Then $S$ is not a compact subspace of $\R$.
From: :Real Number Line is Metric Space :Metric Space is Hausdorff :Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed the result follows by the rule of transposition. {{qed}}
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number|set of real numbers]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be non-[[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] in $\R$. Then $S$ is not a [[Definition:Compact Subspace|compact subspace]] of $\R$.
From: :[[Real Number Line is Metric Space]] :[[Metric Space is Hausdorff]] :[[Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed]] the result follows by the [[Rule of Transposition|rule of transposition]]. {{qed}}
Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Closed_Set_of_Real_Numbers_is_not_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Closed_Set_of_Real_Numbers_is_not_Compact/Proof_2
[ "Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact", "Compact Spaces (Real Analysis)", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace" ]
[ "Real Number Line is Metric Space", "Metric Space is T2", "Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed", "Rule of Transposition" ]
proofwiki-6294
Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact
Let $\R$ be the set of real numbers considered as an Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be non-closed in $\R$. Then $S$ is not a compact subspace of $\R$.
By the rule of transposition, it suffices to show that if $S$ is a compact subspace of $\R$, then $S$ is closed. Consider the relative complement of $S$ in $\R$: :$T = \relcomp \R S = \R \setminus S$ It remains to be shown that $T$ is open in $\R$. Let $x \in T$. For all strictly positive real numbers $\epsilon \in \R_...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number|set of real numbers]] considered as an [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be non-[[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] in $\R$. Then $S$ is not a [[Definition:Compact Subspace|compact subspace]] of $\R$.
By the [[Rule of Transposition|rule of transposition]], it suffices to show that if $S$ is a [[Definition:Compact Subspace|compact subspace]] of $\R$, then $S$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]]. Consider the [[Definition:Relative Complement|relative complement of $S$ in $\R$]]: :$T = \relcomp \R S = ...
Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact/Proof 3
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Closed_Set_of_Real_Numbers_is_not_Compact
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Non-Closed_Set_of_Real_Numbers_is_not_Compact/Proof_3
[ "Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact", "Compact Spaces (Real Analysis)", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace" ]
[ "Rule of Transposition", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Relative Complement", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Strictly Positive/Real Number", "Union of Open Sets of Metric Space is Open", "Definition:Open Set/Metric Sp...
proofwiki-6295
Compact Subspace of Real Numbers is Closed and Bounded
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as a Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be compact subspace of $\R$. Then $S$ is closed and bounded in $\R$.
From: : Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact : Unbounded Set of Real Numbers is not Compact the result follows by the Rule of Transposition. {{qed}}
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as a [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be [[Definition:Compact Subspace|compact]] [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of $\R$. Then $S$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] and [[Definitio...
From: : [[Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact]] : [[Unbounded Set of Real Numbers is not Compact]] the result follows by the [[Rule of Transposition]]. {{qed}}
Compact Subspace of Real Numbers is Closed and Bounded/Proof 1
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Real_Numbers_is_Closed_and_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Real_Numbers_is_Closed_and_Bounded/Proof_1
[ "Compact Subspace of Real Numbers is Closed and Bounded", "Compact Spaces (Real Analysis)", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
[ "Non-Closed Set of Real Numbers is not Compact", "Unbounded Set of Real Numbers is not Compact", "Rule of Transposition" ]
proofwiki-6296
Compact Subspace of Real Numbers is Closed and Bounded
Let $\R$ be the real number line considered as a Euclidean space. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be compact subspace of $\R$. Then $S$ is closed and bounded in $\R$.
From Real Number Line is Metric Space, $\left({\R, d}\right)$ is a metric space, where $d$ denotes the Euclidean metric on $\R$. Therefore, the result follows from: : Metric Space is Hausdorff : Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed and: : Compact Metric Space is Totally Bounded : Totally Bounded Metric Space i...
Let $\R$ be the [[Definition:Real Number Line|real number line]] considered as a [[Definition:Euclidean Space|Euclidean space]]. Let $S \subseteq \R$ be [[Definition:Compact Subspace|compact]] [[Definition:Metric Subspace|subspace]] of $\R$. Then $S$ is [[Definition:Closed Set (Metric Space)|closed]] and [[Definitio...
From [[Real Number Line is Metric Space]], $\left({\R, d}\right)$ is a [[Definition:Metric Space|metric space]], where $d$ denotes the [[Definition:Euclidean Metric on Real Number Line|Euclidean metric on $\R$]]. Therefore, the result follows from: : [[Metric Space is Hausdorff]] : [[Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Spac...
Compact Subspace of Real Numbers is Closed and Bounded/Proof 2
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Real_Numbers_is_Closed_and_Bounded
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Compact_Subspace_of_Real_Numbers_is_Closed_and_Bounded/Proof_2
[ "Compact Subspace of Real Numbers is Closed and Bounded", "Compact Spaces (Real Analysis)", "Real Analysis" ]
[ "Definition:Real Number/Real Number Line", "Definition:Euclidean Space", "Definition:Compact Topological Space/Subspace", "Definition:Metric Subspace", "Definition:Closed Set/Metric Space", "Definition:Bounded Metric Space" ]
[ "Real Number Line is Metric Space", "Definition:Metric Space", "Definition:Euclidean Metric/Real Number Line", "Metric Space is T2", "Compact Subspace of Hausdorff Space is Closed", "Compact Metric Space is Totally Bounded", "Totally Bounded Metric Space is Bounded" ]
proofwiki-6297
Category of Subobjects is Category
Let $\mathbf C$ be a metacategory. Let $C$ be an object of $\mathbf C$. Let $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C}} C$ be the category of subobjects of $C$. Then $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C}} C$ is a metacategory.
Let us verify the axioms $(C1)$ up to $(C3)$ for a metacategory. Let $f: m_1 \to m_2$ and $g: m_2 \to m_3$ be morphisms of $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C}} C$. That $g \circ f: m_1 \to m_3$ is again a morphism follows from the following commutative diagram in $\mathbf C$: $\quad\quad \begin{xy}\xymatrix@+2em{ \operator...
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Let $C$ be an [[Definition:Object (Category Theory)|object]] of $\mathbf C$. Let $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C}} C$ be the [[Definition:Category of Subobjects|category of subobjects]] of $C$. Then $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C}} C$ is a [[Definition:M...
Let us verify the axioms $(C1)$ up to $(C3)$ for a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Let $f: m_1 \to m_2$ and $g: m_2 \to m_3$ be [[Definition:Morphism (Category Theory)|morphisms]] of $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C}} C$. That $g \circ f: m_1 \to m_3$ is again a [[Definition:Morphism (Category Theory)|morphi...
Category of Subobjects is Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Subobjects_is_Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Subobjects_is_Category
[ "Categories of Subobjects" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Object (Category Theory)", "Definition:Category of Subobjects", "Definition:Metacategory" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Subobject", "Definition:Identity Morphism", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Composition of Morphisms", "Definition:Associative Operation", "Definition:Metacategory" ]
proofwiki-6298
Category of Subobjects is Preorder Category
Let $\mathbf C$ be a metacategory. Let $C$ be an object of $\mathbf C$. Let $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C} } C$ be the category of subobjects of $C$. Then $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C} } C$ is a preorder category.
By Category of Subobjects is Category, we know $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C} } C$ is a metacategory. By definition of preorder category, it suffices to show that if $f, g: m \to m'$ are morphisms with the same domain and codomain, then $f = g$. The situation is sketched by the following commutative diagram in $\mathb...
Let $\mathbf C$ be a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. Let $C$ be an [[Definition:Object (Category Theory)|object]] of $\mathbf C$. Let $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C} } C$ be the [[Definition:Category of Subobjects|category of subobjects]] of $C$. Then $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C} } C$ is a [[Definition...
By [[Category of Subobjects is Category]], we know $\map {\mathbf{Sub}_{\mathbf C} } C$ is a [[Definition:Metacategory|metacategory]]. By definition of [[Definition:Preorder Category|preorder category]], it suffices to show that if $f, g: m \to m'$ are [[Definition:Morphism|morphisms]] with the same [[Definition:Domai...
Category of Subobjects is Preorder Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Subobjects_is_Preorder_Category
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Category_of_Subobjects_is_Preorder_Category
[ "Categories of Subobjects", "Preorder Categories" ]
[ "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Object (Category Theory)", "Definition:Category of Subobjects", "Definition:Preorder Category" ]
[ "Category of Subobjects is Category", "Definition:Metacategory", "Definition:Preorder Category", "Definition:Morphism", "Definition:Domain (Category Theory)", "Definition:Codomain (Category Theory)", "Definition:Commutative Diagram", "Definition:Subobject", "Definition:Monomorphism (Category Theory)...
proofwiki-6299
Integral of Power/Fermat's Proof
:$\ds \forall n \in \Q_{>0}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
First let $n$ be a positive integer. Take a real number $r \in \R$ such that $0 < r < 1$ but reasonably close to $1$. Consider a subdivision $S$ of the closed interval $\closedint 0 b$ defined as: :$S = \set {0, \ldots, r^2 b, r b, b}$ that is, by taking as the points of subdivision successive powers of $r$. Now we tak...
:$\ds \forall n \in \Q_{>0}: \int_0^b x^n \rd x = \frac {b^{n + 1} } {n + 1}$
First let $n$ be a [[Definition:Positive Integer|positive integer]]. Take a [[Definition:Real Number|real number]] $r \in \R$ such that $0 < r < 1$ but reasonably close to $1$. Consider a [[Definition:Subdivision of Interval|subdivision]] $S$ of the [[Definition:Closed Real Interval|closed interval]] $\closedint 0 b$...
Integral of Power/Fermat's Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power/Fermat's_Proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integral_of_Power/Fermat's_Proof
[ "Integral Calculus" ]
[]
[ "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Real Number", "Definition:Subdivision of Interval", "Definition:Real Interval/Closed", "Definition:Upper Darboux Sum", "Sum of Geometric Sequence", "Definition:Positive/Integer", "Definition:Strictly Positive", "Definition:Rational Number", "Definition:Ra...