Split (1)

train · ~24M rows (showing the first 1.04M)

Document stringlengths 87 1.67M	Source stringclasses 5 values
Page:Philosophical Transactions - Volume 002.djvu/39 long Wine-staple B in the Ball A, and a springing wire C, with a bended end F, and into the said Staple, press in with your fingers the springing Wire on the bended end: and on it hang the weight D, by its hook E, and so let Globe and all sink gently into the water, in the posture represented in the said Figure, to the bottom, where the weight D touching first, is thereby stopt; but the Ball, being by the Impetus it acquired in descending, carried downwards a little after the weight is stopt, suffers the springing Wire to fly back, and thereby sets it self at liberty to re-ascend. And by observing the time of the Ball's stay under water (which may be done by a Watch, having Minutes and Seconds; or by a good Minute-Glass; or best of all, by a Pendulum, vibrating Seconds; the which must be three foot, three inches, and one fifth of an inch long, viz. between the middle of the Bullet and the upper end of the Thread, where it is fastned, or held when it vibrates.) You may by this way, with the help of some Tables, come to know any depth of the Sea. Note, That care must be had of proportioning the weight and shape of the Lead, to the bulk, weight, and figure of the Globe, after such a manner, as upon experience shall be found most convenient. In some of the Trials already made 'with this Instrument, the Globe being of Maple-wood, well covered with Pitch, to hinder soaking in, was 5 inches in Diameter, and weighed 2½ pounds; the Lead, of 4½ pounds weight, was of a Conical (but is now used of a Globous) Figure 11 inches long, with the sharper end downwards, 1 at the bottom in Diameter. And, in those Experiments made in the Thames, in the depth of 19 foot water, there passed between the Immersion and Emersion of the Globe, 6 Seconds of an hour; and in the depth of 10 foot water, there passed 3½, Seconds, or thereabouts: From many of which kind of Experiments, it will likely not be hard to find out a method to calculate, what depth is to be concluded from any time of the like Globes stay under water: As for instance, if in the depth of 20 fathom, measured by the Line, the Globe stay under water 15 Seconds; then if the Ball stay 600 Seconds, the depth of the Sea is 933 fathom and 2 foot, if the Ball be found to move equal spaces in equal time. In	WIKI
An Ayurvedic Approach to Female Fertility An Ayurvedic Approach to Female Fertility Ayurveda is a beautiful blend of considering both a person's inner workings (mind, body, and spirit) along with their surroundings (the environment, the seasons, world events). For conception to occur, there must be harmony. A healthy body, a mind at peace, and favorable timing are all important components when it comes to Ayurveda and fertility. In our previous article, we looked at the four Ayurvedic essential elements associated with fertility: • Timing • The Field • Healthy and Nutritious Fluids • The Seed Taking a health-focused approach to each of these can help increase a woman’s fertility. The woman is not the only person involved in the conception, but her role is a significant one. Her wellbeing can lead to not only a successful conception but may also influence the health of her child. Preparing the Body and Mind Conception starts with a healthy body. Namely, the ovum and the uterus. Ayurveda believes healthy reproductive tissues are key to creating a healthy pregnancy and a healthy child. Known as Shukra tissue, these reproductive tissues can’t be exercised or whipped into shape. Instead, their health begins with the food you eat. The food is then broken down into various products for your body, such as nutritious fluid, bone, muscle. The last is reproductive tissue. That is why Ayurveda considers reproductive tissue to be the most refined and complete. This chain of metabolic transformations begins with food and ends with reproductive tissues. A woman should consider both the food she eats as well as the health of her other tissues (muscle, bone, fluids) to improve her fertility. 1. Nourish Your Metabolic System with Diverse Foods and Spices Generally, enjoying a variety of foods is best. This way you can ensure that all tissues are nourished and satisfied. The ayurvedic practice also recommends rotating your menus often, so you are not consuming the same foods day after day. A diet based on fruits, vegetables, lentils, pulses, and nuts is recommended. These foods contain plenty of vitamins and minerals that your body needs. Additionally, their fiber and protein can provide you with energy and strength. Spices and herbs that maintain and feed your digestive fire are also important. Maca, Ashwagandha, Shatavari, Shilajit, Zinc, Fenugreek, Moringa, and Black Pepper all are known for being fertility friendly. Many of these herbs have characteristics such as hormone balancing, stress-reducing, and immune-boosting. You can reap their benefits by taking them in supplement form or as a tea. Nourishing Foods: • Fresh fruits and veggies • Dairy proteins • Whole grains • Soaked nuts • Dried fruits • Mung dhal • Healthy fats Foods and Spices for Reproductive Tissue: • Dates • Mango • Asparagus • Broccoli • Cumin • Turmeric • Ginger • Ashwagandha • Shatavari • Maca • Shilajit • Fenugreek • Moringa • Black Pepper *Stimulants, like coffee, tobacco, and sugar are not advised. Fertility support for him Fertility Support for Her A fertility support developed by experts. This supplement contains a blend of Ayurvedic herbs and vitamins including CoQ10, Shatavari, Ashwagandha, Maca, Chasteberry, Folate, Zinc, and Selenium. BUY nOW 2. Pay Attention to Your Hormones Your physical condition is not the only factor that influences healthy reproductive tissue. Hormones and your emotional well-being (particularly stress) both play an important role. It is understood that hormones are vital to conception. Hormones regulate a woman’s menstrual cycle. They dictate when an egg is released, known as ovulation. Instead of focusing just on the hormones responsible for reproduction, progesterone, and estrogen, Ayurveda takes a holistic approach. The practice considers all your hormones and how they can be better balanced. Additionally, instead of targeting hormone secretion directly, Ayurveda tries to regulate your body's hormone reception and feedback functions with healthy foods and herbs. Maca, Shatavari, and Moringa are all wonderful hormone balancers. They can help regulate estrogen and progesterone in the body. In powdered form, you can add them to your favorite dishes and beverages. Or, they can be combined into a powerful fertility supplement. This all-encompassing approach can be much better than just introducing more hormones. It is about balance, teaching your body to coordinate its functions, and providing your system with a chance to level out. 3. Manage Your Stress with Mental Practices Hormones and emotions are linked. Stress specifically can cause certain hormone levels to increase or decrease. While infertility is linked to higher stress levels, researchers are unsure if stress is directly tied to decreased fertility. However, because stress can affect a woman’s hormonal balance and her metabolic function it is important to try and reduce stress and anxiety. Ayurveda doesn’t consider stress in general to be a bad thing. It can challenge your body and help you learn to adapt. But if left unchecked it can have negative effects. How can you improve your emotional well-being and lower stress? Mind-body connection. Meditation, self-reflection, and a focus on internal balance and stillness are important practices. Repeating positive mantras, maintaining positive energy, and practicing yoga are also beneficial practices. Ayurveda believes that health, and subsequently fertility, depend on a balance of mind, body, and spirit. Understanding that these things must work in harmony for better fertility is important. 4. Adopt a Routine Daily routines are also great at reducing stress. Stress can often throw off our routines, maintaining them though helps us stress-less. Ayurvedic daily routines include waking up early, inner and outer cleansing, light physical movement, massage, meditation, breathing exercises, and a nourishing breakfast. You can tailor your routine to suit your needs and schedule. Though trying to incorporate a piece of each part of the ayurvedic daily routine is best. 5. Add Adaptogens to Your Diet Adaptogenic herbs are wonderful tools for reducing stress and as a result, boosting fertility. Two such herbs are ashwagandha and Shatavari. Ashwagandha is known for its calming properties. It can help reduce anxiety, promote sleep, and boost fertility. Its ability to increase blood flow and assist in regulating menstrual cycles are wonderful characteristics for those trying to conceive. In addition to consuming ashwagandha, you can also use ashwagandha oil for massage. The oil may help strengthen your reproductive tissues, excellent for both conception and pregnancy. Shatavari is another adaptogenic herb. It may help to reduce stress while boosting your immune system and promoting fertility. It is believed to nourish and strengthen the uterus. It has also been used to regulate menstrual cycles. The fact that it is an aphrodisiac doesn’t hurt either! When thoughtful combinations of herbs are used, like those found in fertility supplements, your fertility, mental clarity, and physical health all may flourish. A Holistic Approach Ayurveda takes into consideration your entire being when it comes to fertility. From the foods, you eat to your body functions, from your emotional health to your mind-body connection. Fertility starts with a healthy foundation, physically, emotionally, and spiritually. Posted by Shruti Mishra Shruti is the founder of Freshly mom. She is a professional plant based chef from Natural Gourmet Institute, NY and a certified IIN health coach. She has been working with Ayurveda, food & nutrition since over 10 years and is also a fresh mom herself.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Mikulicz's drain Mikulicz's drain is a name used for a procedure used in emergency medicine to control bleeding. Today, it is primarily used in post-operative surgery as a last resort when all other methods to control bleeding fail. The procedure involves pushing a layer of gauze into the wound, then packing in several more layers of gauze as the original layer is pushed deeper into the cavity. Pressure is thus induced while the capillary action of the improvised gauze-sac secures drainage. It was developed by Polish surgeon Jan Mikulicz-Radecki (1850-1905) as a means to drain the abdominal cavity after an operation. In the past, the gauze was treated with iodoform as an antiseptic.	WIKI
Mary Rolleston Elizabeth Mary Rolleston (30 March 1845 – 4 June 1940), known as Mary Rolleston, was a New Zealand homemaker, political hostess and community leader. She was born as Elizabeth Mary Brittan in Castleton, Dorset, England in 1845. Her parents were Joseph Brittan, a surgeon and newspaper proprietor, and Elizabeth Mary Brittan (née Chandler). She had five siblings, two of whom died in infancy and a fortnight after the birth and then death of the last child in 1849, her mother herself died. The surviving siblings were Joseph (Joe), Arthur, and Frances (Frank). Mary Brittan married William Rolleston on 24 May 1865 at Holy Trinity Avonside. She died in Christchurch on 4 June 1940.	WIKI
User:Shanyisheng/sandbox BEIJING - Sergio Aguero scored two second-half goals in a span of seven minutes to lead Argentina to a 3-0 win over rival Brazil and a berth in its second straight Olympic final Tuesday. Allen Iverson Jersey. Argentina will face Nigeria for the gold medal. The Nigerians advanced to the final with a 4-1 win over Belgium. Aguero opened the scoring for the defending champions by chesting in a left-side cross in the 52nd minute, then scored again from two metres on a cross from the right in the 58th. Aguero also set up a 76th-minute penalty kick that was converted by Juan Roman Riquelme. It was the first victory for Argentina against Brazil in three years. It hadnt beaten Brazil since a 3-1 victory in a World Cup qualifier in June 2005. Argentina, trying to become the first country to win consecutive titles in 40 years. Its contest against Nigeria will be a rematch of the 1996 final in Atlanta, when the Africans won 3-2 for their first and only title. The match in front of a crowd of nearly 53,000 at Workers Stadium marked the encounter of the tournaments top stars, former FC Barcelona teammates Lionel Messi and Ronaldinho. Both players displayed their uncanny skills, but Messi threatened the most and created dangerous scoring chances for Argentina. In his first Olympics, the midfielder set up Argentinas second and third goals, while AC Milans Ronaldinho struck the post with a free kick as he tried to put Brazil back into the match. The teams played cautiously, trying to retain possession in midfield and waiting for the right opportunities to strike. Both teams had their first chances in the 12th. Brazil came close after Rafinhas run on the right side, Aguero missed from close range for Argentina with a shot that hit the outside of the net. Messi sent a dangerous shot across the area in the 32nd, and had one of his best chances in the 41st after clearing three defenders inside the area before firing a shot that was barely saved by goalkeeper Renan. Aguero ran past defender Breno to open the scoring after Angel di Marias cross, then easily added to the lead in front of the goal mouth after Ezequiel Garays set-up. Messi started the play on the second goal by eluding several defenders before feeding the ball to Garay. Messi also set up Aguero inside the area before he was fouled by Breno in the play that prompted the penalty kick, which Riquelme converted with a right-footed shot into the middle of the net. After Agueros first goal, striker Rafael Sobis almost tied it with a powerful low shot that struck the post in the 60th. Ronaldinho also hit the post on a free kick in the 65th. Substitute forward Alexandre Pato scored after the free kick, but the goal was disallowed for offside. Brazil midfielder Lucas was sent off in the 81st after a foul from behind on Liverpool teammate Javier Mascherano. Substitute midfielder Thiago Neves was red-carded just three minutes later after another hard foul on Mascherano. The teams had tied 0-0 in World Cup qualifying earlier in June, but Brazil routed Argentina 3-0 in last years Copa America and won by the same score in a friendly in London in 2006. Nigeria beat Belgium in Shanghai. Chinedu Ogbuke Obasi scored twice while Olubayo Adefemi and Ogbuke Obasi had the others. Adefemi scored in the 17th minute, Ogbuke Obasi added goals in the 59th and 72nd, and Chibuzor Okonkwo added a fourth in the 76th. Belgium replied two minutes from the end with a 25-metre free kick from Laurent Ciman.	WIKI
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO, Defendant. No. 3:02CV7565. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. April 18, 2006. Jillian S. Davis, Cleveland, OH, Thomas P. Goodwin, Toledo, OH, Jeffrey M. Gam-so, ACLU of Ohio Foundation, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff. Andrew K. Ranazzi, John A. Borell, Sr., Lance M. Keiffer, Maureen 0. Atkins, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Toledo, OH, for Defendant. ORDER CARR, Chief Judge. This is a civil liberties case. Plaintiff American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation (ACLU) claims that a monument inscribed with the Ten Commandments (also referred to as the Decalogue) on the grounds of the Lucas County courthouse in Toledo, Ohio, violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 7, of the Ohio Constitution. Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,1343 and 1367. The ACLU seeks declaratory and in-junctive relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 1983; it also seeks attorneys fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b). Pending are the ACLU’s and the County’s counter-motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the County’s motion shall be granted, and the ACLU’s motion shall be denied. Background In June, 1957, the Fraternal Order of the Eagles donated a granite monument bearing the text of the Ten Commandments to the County, which installed the monument at the Southeast corner of the courthouse square. The courthouse is located West of Toledo’s downtown business district. The monument faces away from the courthouse (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. FI; Doc. 21 at 2), and is readily visible to pedestrians approaching the courthouse from downtown Toledo, including lawyers who have their offices in the central business district. Persons arriving by car are likely, though, to park South, West, or Northwest of the courthouse square; their direct path to the courthouse, which can be entered only from the West, would not take them past the monument. The monument depicts two tablets resembling traditional portrayals of the Decalogue as brought, according to the Biblical account, by Moses from Mount Sinai. (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. F 1 (containing photos of the monument); see also Doc. 21 at 2 (describing the monument); Doe. 29 at 2 (same)). Other symbols adorn the monument above and below the text of the Commandments, including: 1) two smaller, inscribed tablets with Greek text; 2) a bald eagle and United States flag; 3) the “all seeing eye” (also found on the Great Seal of the United States); 4) two stars of David, commonly associated with the Jewish faith and the state of Israel; and 5) the Chi-Rho symbol, a first century image used by early Christians. (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. FI; see also Doc. 29 at 2). At the bottom of the monument is the following, inscribed as if etched on a scroll: PRESENTED TO THE COUNTY OF LUCAS, STATE OF OHIO BY TOLEDO AERIE NO. 197 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES 1957 (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. FI). The words, “the Ten Commandments,” followed by “I AM the LORD thy God” appear on separate lines above the text of the individual commandments. The lettering of that caption is larger than that of the other writing on the monument. (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. FI). The Eagles presented many similar monuments to local governments in the 1950s and 1960s. See generally ACLU v. City of Plattsmouth, 419 F.3d 772, 773 n. 3 (8th Cir.2005) (describing the history of the monuments). They provided the monuments as part of a nation-wide campaign to counteract juvenile delinquency — to call the attention of young people to the moral code embodied in the Ten Commandment’s text. Id. (citing cases referring to the prevention of juvenile delinquency as motivating factor for the actions of the Eagles); see also Twombly v. City of Fargo, 388 F.Supp.2d 983, 985 (D.N.D.2005). With specific reference to the Lucas County monument, a contemporary newspaper article in the record in this case states the Eagles presented the Lucas County monument “as part of its youth guidance program.” (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. A). The monument stands several feet from a flag pole set in a concrete base. The flag pole is a Catholic War Veterans Memorial, with an inscription reading, “Catholic War Veterans of the United States of America, for God, country and home, April 19, 1957.” (Def. Lucas County’s Exs. F (map of courthouse grounds), FI (photos), F2 (same)). Among fourteen other memorials spread about the courthouse square are, inter alia, a stone monument of the Bill of Rights (donated by the ACLU in 1959) (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. F2); a statue and memorial to Spanish-American War veterans (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. F4, F5); and a statue honoring Ohio-born President William McKinley. (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. F3, F4). Six of the markers on the courthouse lawn are in the same general area as the Ten Commandments; the remainder are closer to the courthouse and further from the monument. (Doc. 29 at 3). Two markers on the grounds are historical markers explaining noteworthy information about Lucas County’s history. (Id.) Some others are plaques from various groups noting commemorative trees on the lawn. (Id.) In addition to the Decalogue monument and Catholic War Veterans Memorial, the statue of President McKinley also incorporates a religious reference: it quotes President McKinley as saying on his deathbed, “Nearer my God to thee,” and “Goodbye all, Goodbye. It is God’s way. His will be done, not ours.” (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. F3, F4). The Ten Commandments monument was installed and dedicated in June, 1957, during a public ceremony. (Id.) Two judges, one county commissioner, Toledo’s mayor, and two representatives of the Eagles participated. (See id. (newspaper photo of dedication ceremony and accompanying caption)). The news accounts do not record the presence or participation at the dedication ceremony of clergy or other representatives of religious organizations. (Id.) Local religious leaders did, however, write letters to the Board of Commissioners supporting the placement of the monument. (Id.) Commission Chairman Ray Gedert was quoted in a June 15, 1957, newspaper as stating, “If everyone read and followed the inscription, there would be less need for the courthouse building behind the marker.” (Id.) There is no other evidence concerning the Board’s purpose in accepting the monument from the Eagles. On November 26, 2003, the ACLU brought suit, alleging that continued display of the Decalogue on the courthouse lawn violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. No one had filed a formal complaint in the forty-six years pri- or to the ACLU lawsuit. (Doc. 21 at 2). The County contends the monument “reflect[s] historical notions of law” and commemorates the role of the Decalogue “in the enforcement of the rule of law.” (Doc. 21 at 2). The County asserts the monument “was erected for secular purposes reflecting Lucas County’s commitment to the rule of law as enforced in the Courthouse behind the Statue.” (Doc. 21 at 1). This case was stayed when the Supreme Court granted certiorari in ACLU v. McCreary County, 354 F.3d 438 (6th Cir.2003), and Van Orden v. Perry, 351 F.3d 173 (5th Cir.2003). On July 27, 2005, the Court issued its opinion in both cases. The parties in this case filed supplemental briefs to discuss the significance of Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677, 125 S.Ct. 2854, 162 L.Ed.2d 607 (2005), and McCreary County v. ACLU, 545 U.S. 844, 125 S.Ct. 2722, 162 L.Ed.2d 729 (2005). There is no disagreement between the parties about the material facts, only disputes of legal interpretation. Thus this case is well-suited for summary judgment under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I. Standing As an initial matter, the County contends the ACLU does not have standing to bring this suit. An association may sue on behalf of its members if: 1) its members would have standing in their own right; 2) the interests the organization seeks to protect are important to its purpose; and 3) the claim asserted and the relief sought do not require participation by individual members in the suit. Hunt v. Washington Apple Adver. Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 343, 97 S.Ct. 2434, 53 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977); Cleveland Branch, NAACP v. City of Parma, 263 F.3d 513, 523-24 (6th Cir.2001); see also Mixon v. State of Ohio, 193 F.3d 389, 393 n. 1 (6th Cir.1999). The ACLU is suing Lucas County on behalf of its members. Charles Boss, an attorney who practices in Lucas County and is a dues-paying, registered member of the ACLU, testified that the monument offended him and diminished his use and enjoyment of the courthouse and its grounds. (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. C at 6-7, 12-14, 35-44; PL’s Ex. A at ¶¶ 1, 5, 6, 7; Doc. 29 at 3). The County alleges Boss would not have standing in his own right, and, consequently, the ACLU does not have standing either. To have standing Boss must show he suffers an injury the court can remedy. Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Public Schls., 33 F.3d 679, 682 (6th Cir.1994). The County argues Boss can not make that showing. In cases involving public display of a religious object, “unwelcome direct contact with the object” that causes diminished enjoyment of public facilities confers standing on a plaintiff. Id.; Hawley v. City of Cleveland, 773 F.2d 736, 738-39 (6th Cir.1985) (representative plaintiffs diminished enjoyment of airport from presence of chapel conferred standing); Harvey v. Cobb County, 811 F.Supp. 669, 674-75 (N.D.Ga.1993) (attorney whose practice required him to make regular appearances in local courthouse had standing to challenge county’s placement of Ten Commandments on wall outside clerk’s office). Unwelcome contact has been found with regard to Decalogue monuments on public grounds or premises. See, e.g., Books v. City of Elkhart, 235 F.3d 292, 299-301 (7th Cir.2000) (finding standing where plaintiffs were forced to see a Ten Commandments monument because of a right or duty to enter a municipal building where it was located); ACLU v. Hamilton County, 202 F.Supp.2d 757, 761-62 (E.D.Tenn.2002) (standing exists where association members must enter a courthouse with a Ten Commandments display because, inter alia, residents must go to the courthouse to renew automobile license tags); Adland v. Russ, 107 F.Supp.2d 782, 784 (E.D.Ky.2000) aff'd, 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir.2003) (plaintiff had standing because its members frequently travel to state capítol, which has a Ten Commandments monument on its grounds); ACLU v. Pulaski County, 96 F.Supp.2d 691, 694 (E.D.Ky.2000) (plaintiffs had standing because they needed to conduct civic business in a courthouse with a Ten Commandments exhibit). Nevertheless, the County argues Boss’s beliefs about the monument are insincere. In support, defendants suggest Boss is “politically selective” about which public references to God offend him. (Doc. 33 at 5-6; see also Doc. 21 at 4-5 (referring, inter alia, to portions of Boss’s deposition testimony indicating he never suffered diminished enjoyment of any .event where the Pledge of Allegiance was recited)). Lucas County has not, however, cited any case in which a representative plaintiffs standing to challenge a public display of a religious text hinged on whether the plaintiff was equally offended by all forms of public religious expression. This court finds no basis in law for undertaking the difficult and unpromising task of parsing an individual’s beliefs to determine whether they are “sincere” or not. Boss has stated he finds the monument and its presence in proximity to the courthouse offenr sive and unwelcome: That suffices. Boss, and thus the ACLU, have standing. II. The Substantive First Amendment Issues The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no- law respecting an establishment of religion.” U.S. Const. Amend. I. The Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the First Amendment’s requirements as applicable to the states. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290, 301, 120 S.Ct. 2266, 147 L.Ed.2d 295 (2000). The Supreme Court has had difficulty applying the Establishment Clause to Ten Commandments monuments. See generally Jay A. Sekulow & Francis J. Manion, The Supreme Court and the Ten Commandments: Compounding the Establishment Clause Confusion, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 33 (2005) (lamenting the Supreme Court’s failure “to clear away the fog obscuring religious display cases”); see also Twombly v. City of Fargo, 388 F.Supp.2d 983, 986 (D.N.D.2005) (“The body of law as developed is convoluted, obscure, and incapable of succinct and compelling direct analysis.”). In 2005, the Supreme Court held that a monument donated by the Eagles, like the one at issue here, and located on the grounds of the Texas Capitol was constitutionally acceptable. Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2864. The Court reached the opposite conclusion with regard to inclusion of the Ten Commandments in a courthouse display of several documents deemed to have historical significance for the development of American law. McCreary County, 125 S.Ct. at 2745. Factually, the cases were very different. In Van Orden, “the 22 acres surrounding the Texas State Capitol contained 17 monuments and 21 historical markers commemorating the ‘people, ideals, and events that compose Texan identity.’ ” 125 S.Ct. at 2858 (citation omitted). The collection of monuments and memorials in Van Or-den included: Heroes of the Alamo, Hood’s Brigade, Confederate Soldiers, Volunteer Fireman, Terry’s Texas Rangers, Texas Cowboy, Spanish-American War, Texas National Guard, Ten Commandments, Tribute to Texas School Children, Texas Pioneer Woman, The Boy Scouts’ Statue of Liberty Replica, Pearl Harbor Veterans, Korean War Veterans, Soldiers of World War I, Disabled Veterans, and Texas Peace Officers. Id. n. I. In McCreary County: [P]etitioners ... (hereinafter Counties), put up in their respective courthouses large, gold-framed copies of an abridged text of the King James version of the Ten Commandments, including a citation to the Book of Exodus. In McCreary County, the placement of the Commandments responded to an order of the county legislative body requiring “the display [to] be posted in ‘a very high traffic area’ of the courthouse.” 96 F.Supp.2d 679, 684 (E.D.Ky.2000). In Pulaski County, amidst reported controversy over the propriety of the display, the Commandments were hung in a ceremony presided over by the county Judge-Executive, who called them “good rules to live by” and who recounted the story of an astronaut who became convinced “there must be a divine God” after viewing the Earth from the moon. Dodson, Commonwealth Journal, Jul. 25, 1999, p. Al, col. 2, in Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Civ. A. No. 99-509 (ED Ky.) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Judge-Executive was accompanied by the pastor of his church, who called the Commandments “a creed of ethics” and told the press after the ceremony that displaying the Commandments was “one of the greatest things the judge could have done to close out the millennium.” Id. at 2728 (footnote omitted). In addition, the Court used different tests in the two cases. As those cases are the Court’s most recent statements on the subject, I shall analyze the ACLU’s claims under their reasoning. A. McCreary County: The Lemon Test In McCreary County, the court applied the Lemon test, Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 612-13, 91 S.Ct. 2105, 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971), which is sometimes supplemented by the endorsement test. See Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 76, 105 S.Ct. 2479, 86 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985). For purposes of the monument and issues in this case, these tests will be viewed as equivalent and discussed under the rubric of Lemon. Under the Lemon test, state action is constitutional and therefore permissible if: 1) it has a secular purpose; 2) its primary effect does not advance or inhibit religion; and 3) it does not foster excessive government entanglement with religion. Id. The first, or “purpose,” prong involves a subjective inquiry into the governmental actor’s intent: i.e., did such actor intend to send a message endorsing a particular religion. Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 691, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984) (O’Connor, J., concurring). The second, or “effects,” prong involves an objective inquiry; namely, whether the challenged display or activity would cause a reasonable observer to conclude the government was endorsing a particular religion. Id. at 692, 104 S.Ct. 1355. One of the attributes of the reasonable observer in this test is that he or she is deemed to be aware of the monument’s history and therefore its purpose. Id. 1. The Issue of Purpose In McCreary County, the Supreme Court emphasized the first prong of the Lemon test, stating the government must show a predominately secular purpose for the posting or display in a governmental setting of material derived from a religion. 125 S.Ct. at 2736. The Court rejected the county’s claim that the display was motivated by a secular purpose and held that it violated the First Amendment. 125 S.Ct. at 2739-40, 2745. To evaluate the purpose prong, a court must determine if the stated secular purpose for the religious display is sincere or a pretext. See Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist., 530 U.S. at 308, 120 S.Ct. 2266 (O’Connor, J., concurring in the judgment). Generally, a court must defer to the government’s stated purpose, McCreary County, 125 5.Ct. at 2735, but deference is not warranted “in those unusual cases where the claim was an apparent sham.” Id. at 2736. Notably, “a finding of impermissible purpose should be rare” and restricted to circumstances where the impermissible purpose “emerges from readily discoverable facts.” ACLU v. Mercer County, 432 F.3d 624, 630 (6th Cir.2005). In light of the Court’s application of the purpose prong in McCreary, displays of the Decalogue, even in a courthouse, if undertaken without a religious purpose, may be constitutionally acceptable. Thus, in Mercer County, the Sixth Circuit, in its first post -McCreary County¡Van Orden Ten Commandments case, upheld the constitutionality of a courthouse exhibit “identical in all material respects ... to the ... displays found unconstitutional in McCreary. ” 432 F.3d at 626. The court reached this conclusion because that display of several documents deemed to be historical antecedents to the American legal system had been posted by a single individual acting on his own, without the religious endorsement and overtones present in McCreary County. Id. at 634. “To be problematic,” the court stated in Mercer County, “there must be something more to signal a predominantly religious purpose.” Id. In this case, the rather scant record indicates the Eagles donated the Decalogue monument to promote a moral code of conduct, rather than religious dogma, and they did so as part of a broad-reaching effort by that organization to reduce juvenile delinquency. There is no reason — at least none in the record- — to doubt that the County accepted the monument on the basis on which it was offered. Indeed, the single comment in the record attributed to a county official at the dedication was to the effect that, if young people paid attention to the statements on the monument, there would be less need for the courthouse in the background. (Def. Lucas County’s Ex. A). Both parties appear, accordingly, to have been motivated by a predominantly secular purpose: to encourage law-abiding conduct on the part of young people. The Supreme Court specifically included combating juvenile delinquency by depicting a moral code of conduct as a legitimate secular purpose. Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2859. Thus, under Lemon’s purpose prong, the Lucas County Decalogue is not constitutionally suspect. 2. The Issue of Effect The second prong of the Lemon test is the “effects” prong. Here, the issue is whether an objective observer would view the state action as endorsing religion. Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 690-92, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984); see also Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753, 779-81, 115 S.Ct. 2440, 132 L.Ed.2d 650 (1995) (O’Con-nor, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment); County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573, 595, 109 S.Ct. 3086, 106 L.Ed.2d 472 (1989); Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 76, 105 S.Ct. 2479, 86 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985) (O’Connor, J., concurring in the judgment) (stating the proper test was whether an “objective observer, acquainted with the text, legislative history, and implementation of the statute, would perceive it as a state endorsement of prayer in public schools”); ACLU v. Mercer County, 432 F.3d 624, 635 (6th Cir.2005) (describing the endorsement test); Granzeier v. Middleton, 173 F.3d 568, 573 (6th Cir.1999); Americans United for Separation of Church & State v. City of Grand Rapids, 980 F.2d 1538, 1543-44 (6th Cir.1992). The “objective” observer is the “personification of a community ideal of reasonable behavior” and analogous to the “reasonable” person in tort law. Capitol Square, 515 U.S. at 780, 115 S.Ct. 2440. Courts assess various characteristics in their effort to perceive how a reasonable person would view the monument in question. For example: 1) sponsorship by a civic organization, despite the monument’s religious text, weighs “against the probability that the religious message will be attributed to the state,” Twombly v. City of Fargo, 388 F.Supp.2d at 983, 990 (D.N.D.2005) (citing Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2870 (Breyer, J., concurring)); 2) the monument’s proximity to government buildings is a factor, but is not alone determinative, see Id., 388 F.Supp.2d at 991 (citing Van Orden and collecting cases analyzing religious displays based on proximity to public buildings); and 3) if a monument containing a text derived from a religious source is found among memorials to secular events or individuals, it will be less likely to violate the Establishment Clause. See Mercer County, 432 F.3d at 637-38 (“When placed on a level with other documents having such unquestioned civil, legal, and political influence, the [Ten] Commandments’ own historical significance becomes more pronounced.”). The Lucas County monument stands at a principal entry point onto the courthouse grounds. Any impression that the County thereby endorses Judeo-Christian religious doctrine or dogma is, however, countered by the express statement that the Eagles donated the monument. That statement might well cause an observer to conclude that the Eagles are promoting religion; but it also makes it less likely that the observer would conclude the County was promoting religion in general or a specific sect in particular. The fact that other memorials are on the Lucas County courthouse square has less significance than that ascribed to it by the parties. The most prominent features of the courthouse square, aside from the century old building itself, are the statues of President McKinley in front of the South entrance, and of a Spanish-American War volunteer at the North entrance. The other markers and memorials are scattered about in a rather random and apparently unplanned manner. This setting is not, therefore, the quasi-theme park of historically significant artifacts at issue in Van Orden. Nonetheless, the physical context of the monument would not cause an objective observer to conclude the County is using it to proclaim religious doctrine. This would be particularly true if the observer were, as the effects prong requires, cognizant of the of the monument’s history. That history necessarily includes the secular purpose that underlay the Eagles’ widespread distribution of this and similar monuments.' As with the purpose prong, under the effects prong, the Lucas County Decalogue is constitutionally permissible. While some who see it may read its text as a proclamation of faith, and give it a measure of devotion, the Lucas County Decalogue neither compels that interpretation nor commands that response on the part of an objective observer. B. Van Orden In Van Orden, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote an opinion in which Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas joined. Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2858 (plurality opinion). According to the Chief Justice, the Lemon test was “not useful in dealing with the sort of passive monuments that Texas has erected on its Capitol grounds.” Id. at 2861. He focused his analysis on the history of religion in the United States and the particular monument’s context on the capítol grounds. Id. The Chief Justice asserted that it was improper for federal courts to ignore the historical influence that religion, including the Ten Commandments, has had on American society. Id. at 2861-63 (stating, inter alia, there was an “unbroken history of official acknowledgment by all three branches of government of the role of religion in American life”). According to the Chief Justice, allowing a Decalogue on public property alongside monuments of a distinctly secular character did not constitute state promotion of a particular religion. Id. In that setting, with secular monuments and memorials within the same area, the text could most properly be viewed as expressing the history and ideals of the people of Texas. Id. at 2869-70. Writing separately, Justice Breyer concurred only in the judgment in Van Orden. Id. at 2868. His opinion is important “because, of the five Justices who voted to allow the continued display of the Texas monument, his opinion reflects the narrowest interpretation of the Establishment Clause.” Card, 386 F.Supp.2d at 1176 (citations omitted) (“when no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgment on the narrowest grounds”). Justice Breyer also rejected the applicability of the Lemon test to the circumstances in Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2868-73, but did not articulate a clear alternative legal test or standard. Indeed, he stated his decision was not the result of “literal application of any particular test” because no test is a suitable “substitute for the exercise of legal judgment.” Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2869-71 (Breyer, J., concurring). Justice Breyer focused on evaluating the religious display in “context,” which includes its “historic, temporal, and physical setting.” See Card, 386 F.Supp.2d at 1173 (citing to and applying Van Orden). In applying his “legal judgment,” Justice Breyer looked at several factors: 1) the circumstances surrounding the Ten Commandments monument’s placement; 2) who donated the monument (a civic [i.e., secular] or religious organization); 3) the physical setting of the monument, including whether other secular monuments were nearby; 4) the “divisiveness” that would result by allowing challenges to longstanding religious monuments; and 5) the fact that no one had filed a formal legal objection to the monument in the forty years it had been on the capitol’s grounds. .Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2870 (Breyer, J., concurring). Justice Breyer called the last factor “determinative.” Id. Applying these factors, Justice Breyer concluded that the monument in Van Or-den served “a mixed but primarily nonreligious purpose” and thus was constitutional. Id. at 2871 (Breyer, J., concurring) Since Van Orden, federal courts have uniformly permitted public displays of Ten Commandments monuments. See, ACLU v. City of Plattsmouth, 419 F.3d 772, 778 (7th Cir.2005) (en banc) (holding that an Eagles-donated Ten Commandments monument (which stood alone in a public park) was constitutional.); Card, 386 F.Supp.2d at 1174-77 (monument, one of several on city property, was constitutional despite participation of clergy at its dedication ceremony); Twombly, 388 F.Supp.2d at 985 (free-standing monument on public mall was constitutional, although clergy attended the dedication ceremony); Russelburg v. Gibson County, 2005 WL 2175527 (S.D.Ind. Sept.7, 2005) (monument one of several on county courthouse grounds). The Lucas County monument is similarly permissible. The monument here is part of an assemblage of several markers, memorials, and monuments on the courthouse lawn. Though the collection appears to lack a cohesive or unitary purpose, placement of this monument among others of a secular and commemorative character weighs in favor of constitutional acceptability. Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2870 (Breyer, J., concurring). To be sure, the Lucas County monument is in a prominent location beside a common route to the courthouse. But that factor is not determinative. See Twombly, 388 F.Supp.2d at 990-92 (finding monument constitutional though it was “neither far removed from government buildings nor surrounded by a collection of secular monuments”). The secular purpose with' which the monument was presented to, and accepted by, the County is underscored by the secular nature of the installation ceremony. In this case, unlike many involving similar monuments, no clergy attended the dedication ceremony. The monument has, moreover, stood without comment or complaint as long as any of the monuments challenged elsewhere. Like those monuments, the Lucas County Decalogue has maintained an undisturbed civic presence for decades. For Justice Breyer, this was, as noted, an important consideration. Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2870 (Breyer, J., concurring). Thus, under either the plurality or concurring opinion in Van Orden, which is the Supreme Court’s most factually similar case, the Lucas County Decalogue is constitutional. III. Ohio Constitutional Claims A federal court can decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), when it has dismissed “all claims over which it has original jurisdiction.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Having dismissed all of the ACLU’s federal claims, I decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining claims based on the Ohio Constitution. Accordingly, the ACLU’s remaining state constitutional claims will be dismissed without prejudice. Conclusion When examined in light of recent Supreme Court precedent, the Lucas County monument survives constitutional challenge. The majority in McCreary County endorsed the Lemon test; under that test, the County is entitled to a finding that its Decalogue does not contravene the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The record shows that the Eagles, in donating, and the County, in accepting the monument were acting with a purpose — to combat juvenile delinquency — that was secular. Considering the effect of the monument under Lemon, I am persuaded that an objective observer could not conclude that the monument, despite the sectarian antecedents of its text, has the effect of endorsing religion in general or the specific tenets of any particular sectarian assembly. In addition, the Chief Justice’s plurality opinion and Justice Breyer’s concurring opinion in Van Orden likewise give an imprimatur of constitutionality to the Lucas County monument. That it has stood unchallenged for nearly five decades is an important consideration; indeed, for Justice Breyer, author of the opinion that decided the outcome of Van Orden, its undisturbed tenure would be “determinative.” 125 S.Ct. at 2870 (Breyer, J., concurring). Consequently, in light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED THAT the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is granted, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is denied. . Some of the cases addressing similar monuments the Eagles provided also mention that, on learning about the Eagles’ program (which originally involved distribution of printed copies of the Decalogue), Cecil B. DeMille, producer of the film The Ten Commandments, offered to underwrite distribution of hundreds of monuments to local governments on behalf of the Eagles. See, e.g., Card v. City of Everett, 386 F.Supp.2d 1171, 1174 (W.D.Wash.2005); Chambers v. City of Frederick, 292 F.Supp.2d 766, 769 (D.Md.2003). DeMille did so under the belief that distributing the monuments might promote his "Hollywood blockbuster movie....” Card, 386 F.Supp.2d at 1176. The parties have not, however, submitted evidence showing DeMille paid for the Lucas County monument. . Defendants do not appear to challenge the ACLU’s standing on any other grounds. . For more detailed information about the monument challenged in Van Orden and the Texas Capitol grounds, see Greg Abbott, Upholding the Unbroken Tradition: Constitutional Acknowledgement of the Ten Commandments in the Public Square, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 51, 53 (2005) (hereinafter, Upholding the Unbroken Tradition). Mr. Abbott, the Attorney General of Texas, argued Van Orden for the Respondent. . There exist still more tests the Supreme Court has developed that could apply to claims like this one. See Twombly, 388 F.Supp.2d at 986 ("There currently exist numerous tests, with varying levels of applicability in various contexts, each of which stakes some claim of suitability to discern whether a government action is violative of the Establishment Clause."); see also p. 18, n. 12, infra. . Some courts consider the first two prongs of the Lemon test to constitute the "endorsement” test, with greater emphasis placed on the effects prong. See Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 690-92, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984); see also Indiana Civil Liberties Union v. O’Bannon, 259 F.3d 766, 770 (7th Cir.2001) (stating "the first two prongs [...] have been refined and dubbed the 'endorsement test’ ”); Books v. City of Elkhart, 235 F.3d 292, 301 (7th Cir.2000) (same). Other courts, however, equate the effects prong with the endorsement test, perhaps because that prong is central to the inquiry. ACLU v. Ashbrook, 375 F.3d 484, 503 (6th Cir.2004) ("In order to ascertain the primary effect of the action under the second prong of the Lemon test, we apply the 'endorsement' test.”). . In this case, the ACLU does not argue the third prong — government entanglement with a particular religion. . The Supreme Court has "repeatedly” held that the Ten Commandments have historical importance. See Mercer County, 432 F.3d at 634 (collecting cases and citing, inter alia, Van Orden and McCreary). The ACLU cites Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39, 41-43, 101 S.Ct. 192, 66 L.Ed.2d 199 (1980), for the proposition that the Ten Commandments lack a secular purpose and are "plainly religious in nature.” Id. at 41, 101 S.Ct. 192. The Supreme Court has since retreated from the idea that Stone represented a per se rule against displaying the Ten Commandments in connection with government activities (e.g., in schools) or on government property. See, e.g., Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 593-94, 107 S.Ct. 2573, 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987); McCreary County, 125 S.Ct. at 2737-38; see also ACLU v. Mercer County, 432 F.3d 624, 634 (6th Cir.2005) ("Whatever is left of Stone [after McCreary County ] is limited to circumstances involving public displays of the Ten Commandments in isolation.”). . This approach is not without its critics. See, e.g., Kirsten K. Wendela, Context is in the Eye of the Beholder: Establishment Clause Violations and the More-Than-Reasonable Person, 80 Chi.-Kent L.Rev. 981 (2005) (criticizing the manner in which the endorsement test invokes the perspective of a "reasonable observer”). . See Erwin Chemerinsky, Why Justice Breyer was Wrong in Van Orden v. Perry, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1 (2005) (hereinafter Breyer). Professor Chemerinsky represented the Petitioner in Van Orden. . Professor Chemerinsky contends Breyer "accepts the test adopted by the four dissenting justices” in Van Orden, which held that "the government may not place religious symbols on government property if [the symbols] symbolically endorse religion.” Chemerinsky, Breyer, 14 Wm. & Maty Bill Rts. J. at 2 (citing Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2872 (Breyer, J., concurring)). .Justice Breyer stated the purpose of the Establishment Clause was to prevent religious divisiveness. 125 S.Ct. at 2871 (Breyer, J., concurring). . Two other tests the Court has used to analyze similar claims are the "no more than” test, Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 682-83, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984), and the "coercion test,” Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 596-97, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992). The Lucas County monument is constitutional under those analyses as well. Under the "no more than” test, a government action passes constitutional muster if it identifies the government with a particular religion no more than other commonplace, traditional practices. Lynch, 465 U.S. at 682-83, 104 S.Ct. 1355. Here, the monument does not identify the government with a particular religion any more than the Ten Commandments monument permitted in Van Orden. The plurality in that case noted, moreover, that displays of the Ten Commandments on government property have been commonplace throughout the country's history. 125 S.Ct. at 2859. Under the "coercion” test, a state action violates the Establishment Clause if it has a "coercive effect” on nonbelievers. The Court seems inclined to employ the "coercion” test in cases involving religious acts in school settings. See Id. at 592, 112 S.Ct. 2649 (stating "there are heightened concerns with pro-tering freedom of conscience from subtle coercive pressure in the elementary and secondary public schools”). That said, “the concern [is] not [] limited to the context of schools” Id, In this case, the government's acceptance of a Decalogue monument on its courthouse grounds does not coerce nonbelievers into participating in a religious act. The monument's presence does not leave passers-by with "no real alternative” to "avoid the appearance of participation” in Judeo-Christian religion practices. Lee, 505 U.S. at 588, 112 S.Ct. 2649. A passive Ten Commandments monument is not coercive: one is free to ignore it, walk around it, or otherwise avoid it. Van Orden, 125 S.Ct. at 2864 (stating the plaintiff could ignore the Ten Commandments monument and had, in fact, walked by it for many years before filing suit). Thus, these other tests support the conclusion that the Lucas County monument is constitutional.	CASELAW
Atal Bihari Vajpayee, former Indian prime minister, dies at 93 Delhi (CNN)Atal Bihari Vajpayee, India's tenth prime minister, died Thursday in New Delhi at the age of 93. He will be remembered as the leader who brought India into the world's nuclear weapons club, but it was his love for poetry and sense of humor that endeared him to national leaders across party lines. His attempts to bring peace between two warring countries, though unsuccessful, ensured a begrudging respect from Pakistan and admiration from Indians. A statement released by the hospital treating him said "his condition deteriorated over the last 36 hours and he was put on life support systems. Despite the best of efforts, we have lost him today." "India grieves the demise of our beloved Atal Ji. His passing away marks the end of an era. He lived for the nation and served it assiduously for decades. My thoughts are with his family, BJP Karyakartas and millions of admirers in this hour of sadness. Om Shanti," tweeted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Vajpayee was prime minister briefly in 1996 and 1998 before eventually serving a full term as premier from 1999 to 2004. He had been admitted in June to the All India institute of Medical Sciences in the capital, suffering from a urinary tract infection and chest congestion. His condition worsened, eventually becoming fatal. Vajpayee never married. He is survived by his adopted daughter, Namita. During his political career, Vajpayee's name became synonymous in India with the rise of the ruling Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), which he helped found in the 1980s. His ascent to the premiership signaled the renewal of the party, which had grown to become the main opposition to the Indian National Congress before eventually overtaking that party. It was during his second stint as prime minister that India conducted the now infamous Pokhran II nuclear tests in 1998, setting off a nuclear arms race on the subcontinent, with Pakistan conducting rival tests within a month. Vajpayee also led India during its most recent war with Pakistan in 1999. Facing heavy criticism at home and abroad over India's nuclear ambitions, Vajpayee defied the threat of economic sanctions, telling parliament that "we have never made a decision after coming under international pressure and we will never do so in the future." Born in December 1924, Vajpayee grew up in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh and was one of the founders of the Janata Party, a splinter group of which became the modern BJP. During his youth he was briefly a member of the right wing Hindu nationalist group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), and was arrested along with his brother in 1942 for protesting against British rule. Vajpayee won his first election to parliament in 1957, a decade after independence. He would go on to hold that role for nine terms. Though he was elected prime minister three times, Vajpayee only competed an entire term once. His first government collapsed in less than three weeks in 1996, and while he took power again in 1998, this only last 13 months before a disagreement within the ruling coalition sparked new elections. Vajpayee was returned to the premiership in 1999 after his BJP-led coalition secured a comfortable majority in the wake of a two-month long war with Pakistan over control of Kashmir. In late 2001, India's parliament was hit by a terrorist attack which Delhi blamed on Pakistan, while in 2002, riots in Gujarat claimed the lives of hundreds of Muslims. Despite India's contentious seven-decade relationship with Pakistan, Vajpayee is credited with being the only Indian leader to make significant progress in peace talks with the country's nuclear-armed neighbor. Even as he pursued a nuclear agreement with Pakistan, Vajpayee remained a defiant defender of India's security policy, an approach which eventually paid off. Economic sanctions imposed after the country's first atomic test were finally lifted in 2000 when Bill Clinton visited the country, the first US President to do so in 22 years. Vajpayee also improved relations with Beijing, officially recognizing Tibet as part of China. A talented orator, one of Vajpayee's most remembered speeches was a hugely critical one, bemoaning India's lack of progress after five decades of independence. "Our country is counted amongst the poorest in the world," he said. "We can't make primary education a necessity. We are still expecting that girls should be educated. The birth of a girl in this country is still a curse." More than 15 years after the speech was given, however, the country continues to be plagued by many of the same problems. Away from politics, Vajpayee is also remembered as an accomplished poet, releasing many books over the years filled with Hindi poems. Just as his fellow BJP prime minister, Narendra Modi, has focused on promoting "brand India," Vajpayee saw great success in building his country's reputation around the world. He addressed the United Nations General Assembly in 2001 and a joint session of the US Congress in 2000. Bilateral agreements signed between his government and Moscow set the stage for annual summits which continue to this day, as does the close relationship with China he cultivated. "At a time when an external stimulus has motivated us to unite against terrorism and for security, let us summon an equally strong inner resolve for development and poverty alleviation," Vajpayee said in his speech to the UN. "They are just as crucial for a global order at peace with itself."	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Aechmea winkleri Aechmea winkleri is a plant species in the genus Aechmea. This species is endemic to the State of Rio Grande do Sul in southern Brazil. It is small and has leaves that sometimes look purple. The stem is red and has yellow flowers.	WIKI
User:Freshgavin Wikipedia is a great community. Perhaps our paths will cross again someday. -G Sandbox / metaWiki / simpleWiki / jaWiki / eoWiki / zhWiki / mailing list FA RC / BQOAN / TOP SECRET PROJECT ja:User:Freshgavin eo:User:Freshgavin simple:User:Freshgavin zh:User:Freshofftheufo	WIKI
Introduction During the WIN-911 runtime alarms can be disabled by placing them into bypass. Once these alarms are bypassed, they will stay bypassed over multiple sessions (shutdown/startups) until the user removes them. However there is a case where bypassed alarms are taken out of bypass automatically by WIN-911. The following document describes the current issue, the cause behind it, and possible ways to avoid it. Discussion WIN-911 only allows the user to bypass “real” alarms. “Real” alarms are alarm points configured in WIN-911 that make a successful connection during runtime. If the user has an alarm point configured in WIN-911 but it does not exist in the data source or we are unable connect to a particular alarm point, this is not a “real” alarm. In this case when you run WIN-911 and select bypass you will not have the option to bypass this non-existent, configured alarm. The user will only see the alarm points that made a successful connection. Similarly, if you have alarms bypassed and you restart WIN-911 but it is unable to connect to a bypassed alarm point WIN-911 removes it from the bypassed alarms since it is non-existent or not a “real” alarm. This is where the problem lies. If WIN-911 removes the alarm point from bypass because it failed to make a successful connection, that alarm is removed permanently. This means if you restart WIN-911 and we are now able to connect to that alarm point, WIN-911 does not put it back into bypass. The alarm point will need to be placed back in bypass. Here is a simple scenario where this can occur: A user bypasses a group of alarms. The user then reboots the computer because of hardware changes. After rebooting the user manually starts WIN-911, except the user forgot to start the data server (iFIX, InTouch, RSView, OPC Server, etc.) first. WIN-911 says it cannot connect to any of the alarm points. At this point the user realizes that they forgot to start the data server so they shutdown WIN-911 and start the data server. Then the user restarts WIN-911. All the alarms placed in bypass are now no longer in bypass. Conclusion As long as WIN-911 sees the alarm points configured as “real” alarms your bypassed alarms will remain bypassed until a user removes them. If at anytime WIN-911 initializes and is unable to connect to a bypassed alarm point, the alarm is removed from the bypassed alarms list. Once a successful connection to the alarm point is made, the user must place the alarm back in bypass.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Hunter Niswander James Hunter Niswander (born November 26, 1994) is an American football punter for the Houston Roughnecks of the United Football League (UFL). He played college football at Northwestern University. Early years Niswander attended Woodridge High School. As a freshman, he made a 35-yard field goal that sealed a state playoff appearance for the first time in school history. As a senior, he set the state record for most consecutive extra points made (111) and the school longest field goal made (53 yards). He received All-PTC and All-Ohio Division III honors. He also practiced soccer and basketball. College career Niswander accepted a football scholarship from the Northwestern University. As a redshirt freshman, he was a backup behind Chris Gradone and punted only five times during the season. As a sophomore, he was named the starter at punter. He averaged 42.8 yards per punt and appeared in every game. As a junior, he ranked fourth in the Big Ten Conference with a 41.3 punt average. He had a 51-yard average in the season opener against Western Michigan University. He made a 62-yard punt against Illinois State University and Michigan State University. As a senior, he averaged 43 yards per punt. He had a career-high 51.5-yard average against Bowling Green State University. He tied for the fourth longest punt (80 yards) in school history against the University of Iowa. He received All-Academic Big Ten honors. DC Defenders (XFL) Niswander was out of football after being invited for a tryout at the Pittsburgh Steelers rookie minicamp in 2018. He was selected in the fifth phase of the 2020 XFL Draft by the DC Defenders. He appeared in all 5 games, while punting 21 times for an average of 44.6 yards. In March, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the league announced that it would be cancelling the rest of the season. On April 10, he had his contract terminated when the league suspended operations. Dallas Cowboys On October 26, 2020, Niswander was signed to the Dallas Cowboys' practice squad. He was promoted to the active roster on November 7, 2020, after punter Chris Jones was placed on injured reserve with a core muscle injury. He averaged 47.2 yards on 26 punts in the final eight games, tying for ninth-best in the NFL. He landed 10 of his punts inside the 20-yard-line. He kicked a 56 yard punt in Week 16 against the Philadelphia Eagles. His production convinced the Cowboys to release Jones on March 17, 2021. On April 7, 2021, punter Bryan Anger was signed to compete with Niswander for the starting position. Anger pulled ahead of him during training camp, so Niswander also focused on placekicking duties, to provide depth while Greg Zuerlein recovered from offseason back surgery. In two preseason games, he was 4 out of 6 attempts, including making all 3 field goal attempts against the Arizona Cardinals. On August 16, Niswander suffered a back injury of his own during a training camp practice. On August 19, he was waived/injured and placed on injured reserve the next day. On December 28, 2021, he was placed on the reserve/COVID-19 list. On January 10, 2022, he was activated from the reserve/COVID-19 list. On April 14, 2022, the Cowboys waived Niswander. Houston Gamblers Niswander signed with the Houston Gamblers of the USFL on May 3, 2023. Niswander and all other Houston Gamblers players and coaches were all transferred to the Houston Roughnecks after it was announced that the Gamblers took on the identity of their XFL counterpart, the Roughnecks.	WIKI
Antenor (writer) Antenor (Ἀντήνωρ) was a Greek writer of uncertain date, wrote a work upon the history of Crete, which on account of its excellence was called Delta (Δέλτα), inasmuch as, says Ptolemy Hephaestion, the Cretans called that which is good Delton (Δέλτον).	WIKI
Lance Rozeboom Lance Rozeboom (born May 31, 1989) is an American soccer player. College and amateur Rozeboom spent his entire college career at the University of New Mexico. In his freshman year in 2008, he made 16 appearances for the Lobos, but didn't record a goal or an assist that year. In 2009, he made started all 20 games for the Lobos and finished with a goal and an assist each. His lone goal came in the first round of the 2009 NCAA College Cup against the University of Portland. Unfortunately, New Mexico would end up losing that match 2–1 in extra time. Rozeboom went on to be named Second team All-Mountain Pacific Sports Federation, Academic All-MPSF and ESPN the Magazine Academic All-District VI First Team in 2009. In 2010, he started all 20 games for the Lobos and finished with two goals and two assists on his way to being named First Team All-MPSF and Third Team All-West. In 2011, he started all 22 games and finished with three goals and two assists on his way to being named First-Team All-MPSF, First-Team All-Far West and was named to Top Drawer Soccer's Top 100 list (No. 37). Rozeboom also played three years with Des Moines Menace in the USL Premier Development League. Professional On January 17, 2012, Rozeboom was drafted in the second round (26th overall) of the 2012 MLS Supplemental Draft by D.C. United. After an impressive preseason, he signed a professional contract with the club on March 7. On March 23, Rozeboom suffered a Torn ACL during training and was ruled out for the rest of the season. He was released from the club on February 27, 2013, without making a single appearance for the club. On March 20, 2013, Rozeboom joined USL Pro club Rochester Rhinos for the 2013 season. He made his professional debut on April 13 in a 3–0 defeat to VSI Tampa Bay FC. On November 17, 2014, it was announced Rozeboom have moved to new USL Pro franchise Austin Aztex. On December 18, 2015, Rozeboom and fellow Austin teammate Fernando Timbó were signed by Ottawa Fury FC of the North American Soccer League. He was re-signed for the 2017 season as the team jumped to the United Soccer League and latter named the third captain in team history. Rozeboom signed with fellow USL club Tampa Bay Rowdies on January 8, 2018.	WIKI
Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.352126 Title: Production of ethanol from cassava starch hydrolysate by immobilised cells of Zymomonas mobilis Author: Costa, Robson Geraldo ISNI: 0000 0001 3389 8265 Awarding Body: University of St Andrews Current Institution: University of St Andrews Date of Award: 1984 Availability of Full Text: Access from EThOS: Access from Institution: Abstract: Cells of Zymononas mobilis (ATCC 10988) were immobilised in calcium alginate beads and used to convert enzymatically hydrolysed cassava starch to ethanol. Optimum operating conditions were investigated in batch experiments. The ogtimum pH range and temperature were found to be 3-0 to 8.0 and 30 C, respectively. The maximum rates of glucose consumption and ethanol formation were obtained with an initial glucose concentration of 100 g/1. There was no fermentation inhibition below an initial ethanol concentration of 60 g/1. Ethanol productivity was the same using pure cassava hydrolysate or a medium composed of cassava hydrolysate, yeast extract and mineral nutrients. The immobilised Zymomonas mobilis cells were studied in a packed-bed reactor system operating under optimised parameters from the batch experiments. Volumetric ethanol productivities of 8.91 g/l.h and 22.5 g/l.h were obtained at 100% and 75% of glucose utilization, respectively; these productivities correspond to 1.5 times that of a free cell reactor when glucose utilisation was 100% and 3 times that of a free cell reactor when glucose utilisation was 75%. The maximum specific ethanol formation rate and the maximum specific glucose uptake rate were found to be 1.4 g/g.h and 2.8 g/g.h, respectively. The immobilised-cell reactor was operated continuously at a constant dilution rate of 0.2 h -1 for 20 days resulting in only a 20% loss of the original fermentative activity corresponding to an estimated half- life of 63 days. Based on experimental data, a mathematical analysis has been made and rate equations proposed. Supervisor: Ledingham, W. M. Sponsor: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.352126 DOI: Not available Keywords: QP609.E9C7 ; Esterases Share:	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
• Jon Mason's avatar PCI-Express Non-Transparent Bridge Support · fce8a7bb Jon Mason authored A PCI-Express non-transparent bridge (NTB) is a point-to-point PCIe bus connecting 2 systems, providing electrical isolation between the two subsystems. A non-transparent bridge is functionally similar to a transparent bridge except that both sides of the bridge have their own independent address domains. The host on one side of the bridge will not have the visibility of the complete memory or I/O space on the other side of the bridge. To communicate across the non-transparent bridge, each NTB endpoint has one (or more) apertures exposed to the local system. Writes to these apertures are mirrored to memory on the remote system. Communications can also occur through the use of doorbell registers that initiate interrupts to the alternate domain, and scratch-pad registers accessible from both sides. The NTB device driver is needed to configure these memory windows, doorbell, and scratch-pad registers as well as use them in such a way as they can be turned into a viable communication channel to the remote system. ntb_hw.[ch] determines the usage model (NTB to NTB or NTB to Root Port) and abstracts away the underlying hardware to provide access and a common interface to the doorbell registers, scratch pads, and memory windows. These hardware interfaces are exported so that other, non-mainlined kernel drivers can access these. ntb_transport.[ch] also uses the exported interfaces in ntb_hw.[ch] to setup a communication channel(s) and provide a reliable way of transferring data from one side to the other, which it then exports so that "client" drivers can access them. These client drivers are used to provide a standard kernel interface (i.e., Ethernet device) to NTB, such that Linux can transfer data from one system to the other in a standard way. Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Mason <jon.mason@intel.com> Reviewed-by: default avatarNicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> fce8a7bb ntb_transport.c 36.1 KB	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Honeywell Increases Full-Year Forecast on Aerospace Sales; Shares Advance Honeywell International Inc. (HON) boosted its 2011 profit forecast after quarterly earnings climbed on higher margins at the unit that licenses technology to oil refineries. Profit excluding some items will be as much as $3.95 a share, up from a March forecast of $3.60 to $3.80, according to a statement today from Honeywell, whose products range from home thermostats to aircraft parts. Sales will increase as much as 9.7 percent, the Morris Township , New Jersey-based company said. First-quarter earnings exceeded analysts’ estimates. Revenue climbed 19 percent at the specialty materials division, which makes refrigerants and licenses refining technology. The division’s segment profit margins were 21 percent, compared with about 15 percent in the previous quarter. “The standout, of course, is specialty materials, it’s a big contributor to the beat,” Ajay Kejriwal, an analyst with FBR Capital Markets in New York . “Huge margins in specialty materials.” Honeywell gained $1.31, or 2.2 percent, to $60.05 at 5:50 p.m. after the close of the New York Stock Exchange. The shares closed today at $58.74, representing a 10 percent increase this year. First-quarter net income climbed 44 percent to $705 million, or 88 cents a share, from $489 million, or 63 cents, a year earlier. Analysts, on average, estimated profit of 82 cents, according to a Bloomberg survey. Aerospace revenue increased 7.6 percent after commercial planemakers increased spending on parts. Sales at the controls division, the company’s largest, climbed 17 percent, helped by demand for products such as gas-detection systems and last year’s $1.1 billion purchase of Sperian Protection. First-quarter revenue increased 15 percent to $8.91 billion. Analysts predicted $8.64 billion on average. Sales for 2011 will be as much as $36.6 billion, Honeywell said. To contact the reporter on this story: Will Daley in New York at wdaley2@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ed Dufner at edufner@bloomberg.net	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Dock Square (Kennebunkport) Dock Square is a public square in Kennebunkport, Maine, United States. It stands at the intersections of Western Avenue, Spring Street and Ocean Avenue and extends southwest to the Mathew J. Lanigan Bridge separating Kennebunkport from Kennebunk. The square is popular with tourists browsing the shops, boutiques and galleries, housed in former homes and 18th-century warehouses. The town's Christmas Prelude sees a Christmas tree being lit in the center of the square, a tradition begun in 1982. In addition, a fireworks festival is held in the square annually on July 4. Former U.S. president George H. W. Bush and first lady Barbara often shopped in Dock Square while staying at nearby Walker's Point Estate.	WIKI
User:(WT-en) Adventures of Angel Adventures of Angel is the journey of a child and her mother thru Mexico during the winters of 2008/9 and 2009/10. Share the adventures thru the eyes of Angel as her mother Tina Winterlik, captures it thru photography, music and videos. Tina Winterlik is Visual Artist that uses Mixed Media to express her dreams and experiences. Thru Photography & Digital Imaging she creates her images. Thru Web Design and Blogging she shares her Art with her audience. Her latest endevour, Adventures of Angel- "THE MOVIE!" is a Blog that features 74 Movies, 3-7 minutes in length, that have Photos and Video from their travels set to Music. This huge project took an entire month to produce but Tina is happy with the outcome. She has made her Dream a Reality. Now she can easily share the wonderful experiences of their journey thru Mexico with everyone easily. Tina Winterlik has a 1995 Diploma in Professional Photography as well has attended a 6 month Web Design Program in 2000. She has created more than 100 watercolour pen/ink images of Mexico. Tina also considers herself as very web & social networking savy. She maintains over 70 blogs & websites. Her current plan are to focus on advertising & promotion for Adventures of Angel-THE MOVIE! and to continue to travel and take Angel on Adventures around the World! Places that Adventures of Angel has visited are Cancun, Merida, Palenque, San Cristobal Las Casas, Agua Azul, Agua Clara, Mishol-ha, Huatulco, Zipolite, Acapulco, Zihuatanejo, Mazunte, La Ventanilla, Puerto Vallarta, Bucerias, Mexico City, Punta Cometa Tina and Angel also hope to share there experiences and to encourage people to bring their children to these magical places. They travelled on a modest budget, mainly staying with local families and supporting small local businesses. They used buses the majority of the time, average 6-16 hrs. During short trips they used camionetas and collectivos. By visiting their blog they hope that they bring joy thru the photos but encourage open-mindness about the beautiful world that is out there.	WIKI
Coolin, Idaho Coolin is an unincorporated community in Bonner County, Idaho, United States. The nearest school district is the West Bonner School District. Geography Coolin is situated at the southeast end of Priest Lake, at an elevation is 2,490 feet above sea level. Climate This climatic region is typified by large seasonal temperature differences, with warm to hot (and often humid) summers and cold (sometimes severely cold) winters. According to the Köppen Climate Classification system, Coolin has a humid continental climate, abbreviated "Dfb" on climate maps. History Andy Coolin opened a post office at the southern end of Priest Lake in 1893, thereby giving his name to the nascent community. Hopes were high for a mining bonanza in the area and for a future link to the railroad, 28 miles away. To accommodate travelers and prospectors, Walt Williams, an employee of the Great Northern Railroad, built a two-story log hotel, the Northern Inn, in 1900. In 1903 Andy Coolin received a patent on a homestead, planning to leverage his land into a financial empire. Coolin formed the Priest Lake Town Site and Improvement Company with his brother and other local investors in 1907. By that time Spokane businessman Joseph Slee already operated a steamboat out of Coolin connecting the lake with supplies, mail, and transportation. In 1906, Leonard Paul opened a general merchandise store in the tiny village; Ida Handy opened the Idaho Inn in 1908. When mining riches failed to pan out and Andy Coolin's efforts to lure the railway to Priest Lake came to naught, the village of Coolin became a center for summer vacationers and services, including a sawmill, store, hotel, ranger station, docks, and steamboat service. Today the Old Northern Inn, the Leonard Paul Store, and the one room schoolhouse, built in 1916 and now the Coolin Civic Association, remain as landmarks from those early days. Coolin's population was estimated at 100 in 1960.	WIKI
File:GroundZero7279.JPG Black marker indicating ground zero of Nagasaki atomic bomb explosion. Column to right is a remnant of the destroyed Urakami Cathedral, moved from its original site 400 meters away. Taken by Keith Finch, December 29, 2004.	WIKI
Testing a form with Big List of Naughty Strings Background I’m using Selenium to spam certain fields with the naughty strings (GitHub - minimaxir/big-list-of-naughty-strings: The Big List of Naughty Strings is a list of strings which have a high probability of causing issues when used as user-input data.) on certain fields then submitting the form. Problem However, I don’t know what errors could manifest without actually watching the screen while it runs. So I have just added Thread.Sleep(50); at the end instead of asserting any elements (as I said I don’t know how the form would react). Question I’m wondering if there is a better way other than watching the screen. Are there common things I can check? (maybe automate checking for text ‘Error’ or some HTTP response?) 1 Like You should run the BLNS against the API. It will be so much faster and you’ll check the same validations (if an error is returned or not) Here you can check the HTTP response + error returned. Using a tool/framework like SoapUI, Postman, … If you wish to test this in the UI, you should not fill in the complete BLNS. It will take way to long. You can just enter a “wrong keyword” and validate if an error is returned in the UI. That was so obvious and yet I missed it! Yes you’re right, I should be testing for the specific error pages and not just spam the field unnecessarily. Not sure how it works with automating BLNS with API tests but I do have Postman installed so it’s worth me exploring that. Thanks for the input! 1 Like Hoeray, happy to help =D Sometimes we just overthink stuff and don’t see what’s in front of us! If you need some help with Postman, don’t be afraid to ask! Easiest is probably to have the request in a collection. The value of your field should be a variable coming from the blns.json file. Be careful though, maybe not all input of the blns file is actually “bad input”. You might need to eliminate some data first. Kind regards	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
+ + to to(Number, Number): Range Returns a range with the specified boundaries. The upper boundary is inclusive. Parameters Name Description from A number (Number type) that starts the range. The output includes the from value. to A number (Number type) that ends the range. The output includes the to value. Example This example lists a range of numbers from 1 to 10. Source %dw 2.0 output application/json --- { "myRange": 1 to 10 } Output { "myRange": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] } Example DataWeave treats a string as an array of characters. This example applies to to a string. Source %dw 2.0 var myVar = "Hello World!" output application/json --- { indices2to6 : myVar[2 to 6], indicesFromEnd : myVar[6 to -1], reversal : myVar[11 to -0] } Output { "indices2to6": "llo W", "indicesFromEnd": "World!", "reversal": "!dlroW olleH" } Was this article helpful? 💙 Thanks for your feedback! Edit on GitHub Submit your feedback! Share your thoughts to help us build the best documentation experience for you! Take our latest survey!	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Talk:Intermezzo Untitled In The Art of Cookery in the Middle Ages, Terence Scully (pg. 109) hints that the origins of the intermezzo can be found in the medieval entremets, the Old French term for a subtlety. This seems to make a lot of sense since subtleties provided a form of culinary entertainment that eventually evolved into completely inedible decorations made of wood and metal. By the end of the 15th century (in Capua, no less) they were already grandiose spectacles with actors portraying Roman and Greek deities presenting the various courses at lavish banquets. The etymology certainly seems to support this connection. Any comments? Peter Isotalo 12:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC) * Yes indeed. They then developed into extravagant masque-like dramatic entertainments in 16th century courts, held in a different location from the meal. This certainly needs covering. Johnbod (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC) * Are you thinking perhaps of the intermedio? Antandrus (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC) * Ah, yes, I thought we did have something. I don't think the two terms are anything like as distinct as these articles imply. Roy Strong in Art and Power; Renaissance Festivals 1450-1650, 1984, The Boydell Press;ISBN<PHONE_NUMBER>, uses "intermezzo" throughout to describe large-scale affairs like those in "intermedio". At the very least this article needs to link there. Johnbod (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC) * According to the New Grove, "Intermezzo" is sometimes used to describe the works inserted between the acts of Renaissance comedies. However they write it up under "Intermedio", which is the Italian word for the same thing. (That's the article I used to write the Intermedio article, way back whenever that was.) It's really just a choice of using an English vs. the Italian word for the things ... which were quite a big deal in Florence and other northern Italian cities. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC) * This doesn't agree with Strong - oddly enough "intermezzo" is "the Italian word" for it too! In Strong & his notes "Intermèdes" appear only in French; the Italian & English scholars use "intermezzo". "Masque" would be one English word. At the moment the article doesn't even link to any of these. Johnbod (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC) * See also Britannica "Intermezzo". Johnbod (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC) Well, the opening states the term falls into two general categories, and then the body gives you three general categories. Could someone with expertise kindly repair this? 2601:444:C201:8670:CCD2:5F9B:50DF:57C3 (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)	WIKI
Eurogroup head to US: If you want billion-dollar fines to stop, sort out your taxes The U.S. must sort out its tax regime if they want to protect their companies from billion-dollar penalties imposed on Apple by the European Union, the head of the euro zone finance ministers group told CNBC. The iPhone maker has found itself in the crosshairs of European regulators for its business tax arrangement with Ireland. European regulators recently determined that Apple must fork over more than $14 billion as a result of having received in "illegal tax benefits." Speaking to CNBC on the sidelines of a Eurogroup meeting in Bratislava Saturday, the group's head, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, said that Apple's row with Europe was largely a "tax issue." Dijsselbloem said that "American companies will have to pay their taxes. Actually I would prefer they have a good arrangement at home in the U.S. to pay their taxes. But that I cannot sort out from Europe. "The Americans need to make sure their companies pay a fair share, at home, and that would solve a large part of this issue." For its part, Ireland has opposed the European Commission's ruling on concerns that it would jeopardize its policy of wooing foreign businesses to relocate there, as well as interfering with the country's' sovereign right to set tax policy. In response, Apple chief executive Tim Cook has slammed the decision as "total political crap" and "completely unfair," However, Dijsselbloem dismissed the controversy, telling CNBC that there was a new mood in Europe. "The bottom line is, and the big companies have to realise this, times are changing and new times will ask them, make them, pay taxes in a fair way," he said. "Where they make their profits, they must pay their taxes to a fair amount, a fair share and I think for too long they have been able to get out of that and it has to stop," the official told CNBC. "I think to my citizens I cannot explain why they should pay their fair share and the large companies do not." Earlier this week, Ireland's Prime Minister, Enda Kenny, told CNBC that the government will appeal the ruling to provide "clarity and certainty." "I am confident the appeal will succeed because what has happened here is that the European Commission has made a finding with regards to state aid rules, which crosses the threshold into tax competency, which is a matter for each individual country," Kenny told CNBC. Apple also plans to mount a separate appeal. Katy Barnato contributed to this report. Follow CNBC International on and Facebook.	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
pip install gym==0.20.0 Gym: A universal API for reinforcement learning environments. Source Among top 1000 packages on PyPI. Over 4.4M downloads in the last 90 days. Commonly used with gym Based on how often these packages appear together in public requirements.txt files on GitHub. tensorflow TensorFlow is an open source machine learning framework for everyone. opencv-python Wrapper package for OpenCV python bindings. atari-py Python bindings to Atari games absl-py Abseil Python Common Libraries, see https://github.com/abseil/abseil-py. imageio Library for reading and writing a wide range of image, video, scientific, and volumetric data formats. tensorflow-probability Probabilistic modeling and statistical inference in TensorFlow tensorboard TensorBoard lets you watch Tensors Flow Keras-Applications Reference implementations of popular deep learning models Keras-Preprocessing Easy data preprocessing and data augmentation for deep learning models tensorflow-gpu TensorFlow is an open source machine learning framework for everyone. gin-config Gin-Config: A lightweight configuration library for Python astor Read/rewrite/write Python ASTs gast Python AST that abstracts the underlying Python version dm-sonnet Sonnet is a library for building neural networks in TensorFlow. torch Tensors and Dynamic neural networks in Python with strong GPU acceleration glfw A ctypes-based wrapper for GLFW3. protobuf Protocol Buffers tensorflow-estimator TensorFlow Estimator. jax Differentiate, compile, and transform Numpy code. Version usage of gym Proportion of downloaded versions in the last 3 months (only versions over 1%). 0.18.3 62.84% 0.19.0 18.98% 0.20.0 4.51% 0.17.2 4.25% 0.15.7 3.85% 0.18.0 1.06% 0.9.7 1.03%	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
User:WildStar/dashboard This is WildStar's dashboard, used to quickly navigate to Wikipedia areas I visit often, and to remember important areas which I rarely visit. Please contact me for any issues. Quick links Deletions Requests Featured articles Boards and committees Templates, icons, and barnstars Copyright References, lists, and tools Drafts and software My edits * Edits by	WIKI
Page:Vance--The trey o hearts.djvu/268 234 and mirthless chuckle, from some considerable distance, and calculated that he who laughed was some place in the clearing. Now the blood of Thomas Barcus ran cold (or he thought it did, which amounts to much the same thing). For if his senses had played fair, the laugh he had heard was the laugh of Mr. Marrophat. He twisted his head to one side and saw nothing but the wall. Twisting the other way, his effort was repaid by the discovery of Rose Trine in plight like unto his own—wrists and ankles bound, gagged into the bargain—the width of the shed between them. But of Alan Law no sign. … Tormented beyond endurance by the fears he suffered for the safety of his friend, he began painfully inching his way across the floor toward Rose, with what design, Heaven alone knows! He had contrived to bridge the distance by half when a dark body put the sunlight of the open doorway into temporary eclipse. Another followed it. Boots clumped heavily on the flooring. Two pairs of hands seized him, one beneath the shoulders, the other beneath the knees, and he was lugged out into the sunlight, carried a considerable distance, and deposited within a few feet of the mouth of the abandoned mine just at the moment when he had satisfied himself that the purpose of his captors was to throw him into that black well.	WIKI
Acoustical measurements and instrumentation Analysis of sound and acoustics plays a role in such engineering tasks as product design, production test, machine performance, and process control. For instance, product design can require modification of sound level or noise for compliance with standards from ANSI, IEC, and ISO. The work might also involve design fine-tuning to meet market expectations. Here, examples include tweaking an automobile door latching mechanism to impress a consumer with a satisfying click or modifying an exhaust manifold to change the tone of an engine's rumble. Aircraft designers are also using acoustic instrumentation to reduce the noise generated on takeoff and landing. Acoustical measurements and instrumentation range from a handheld sound level meter to a 1000-microphone phased array. Components Most of the acoustical measurement and instrumentation systems can be broken down into three components: sensors, data acquisition and analysis. Sensors The most common sensor used for acoustic measurement is the microphone. Measurement-grade microphones are different from typical recording-studio microphones because they can provide a detailed calibration for their response and sensitivity. Other sensors include hydrophones for measuring sound in water, particle velocity probes for localizing acoustic leakage, sound intensity probes for quantifying acoustic emission and ranking, or accelerometers for measuring vibrations causing sound. The three main groups of microphones are pressure, free-field, and random-incidence, each with their own correction factors for different applications. Well-known acoustic sensor suppliers include PCB Piezotronics, Brüel & Kjær, GRAS and Audio Precision. Data acquisition Data acquisition hardware for acoustic measurements typically utilizes 24-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), anti-aliasing filters, and other signal conditioning. This signal conditioning may include amplification, filtering, sensor excitation, and input configuration. Another consideration is the frequency range of the instrumentation. It should be large enough to cover the frequency range of signal interest, taking into account the range of the sensor. To prevent aliasing, many devices come with antialiasing filters, which cut the maximum frequency range of the device to a little less than one-half the maximum sampling rate, as prescribed by the Nyquist sampling theorem. Dynamic range is a common way to compare performance from one instrument to another. Dynamic range is a measure of how small you can measure a signal relative to the maximum input signal the device can measure. Expressed in decibels, the dynamic range is 20 log (Vmax/Vmin). For example, a device with an input range of ±10 V and a dynamic range of 110 dB will be able to measure a signal as small as 10 μV. Thus, the input range and the specified dynamic range are important for determining the needs of your instrumentation system. Analysis Audio and acoustic analysis includes: fractional-octave analysis, sound-level measurements, power spectra, frequency response measurements, and transient analysis. Results are viewed on waterfall displays, colormap displays, and octave graphs.	WIKI
Asilah, Syria Asilah (أصيلة, also spelled Asileh and Asila) is a village in northwestern Syria, administratively part of the Hama Governorate, located west of Hama. Nearby localities include Khunayzir and Mhardeh to the northeast, Maarzaf to the east, Umm al-Tuyur to the southeast, Deir al-Salib to the south, Hanjur to the southwest, Jubb Ramlah to the west, Tell Salhab to the northwest and Safsafiyah to the north. According to the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Asilah had a population of 5,790 in the 2004 census. Its inhabitants are predominantly Alawites. Syrian Civil War In March of 2012, five villagers were killed by opposition gunmen and a teacher kidnapped, after it's residents were accused of taking part in government military operations against the neighboring village of Halfaya. In retaliation, militiamen from the village are widely believed to have taken part in the Al-Qubeir massacre in conjunction with the Syrian Army. Three more villagers were killed on September 6, 2017, after it was shelled by Jaysh al-Izza members, who accused residents of taking part in the killing of eleven civilians in the nearby village of Maarzaf.	WIKI
Page:Suggestions on the Arrangement and Characteristics of Parish Churches.djvu/27 27 Saviour, and the Blessed Virgin, and St. John. In France it was called the “jubé.” The lateral screens were called parcloses. A great deal of controversy has taken place latterly upon the propriety of restoring these screens, as they have fallen into very general disuse since the sixteenth century, and most unwarrantable prejudices have been sought to be raised against them. I think every impartial person will admit that, as we must have some sufficient barrier between the chancel and other parts of a Church, and as all essential features should be rendered as ornamental as propriety allows and means afford, we can have none more beautiful or so full of meaning as a judiciously-designed screen—one of construction so light that it will not prevent the faithful seeing satisfactorily the ceremonies in the chancel, but which will, at the same time, aid in marking the distinction between the sacrifice and the worshippers, and add to the solemnity of religious rites. Every parochial Church should have a baptistry, in which, as the Church desires, the sacrament of regeneration should be administered to the children of all the faithful of the parish, without any distinction on account of the worldly rank or condition of the parents. I am glad to observe gradual introduction of baptismal fonts into several of our city parochial Churches, and even in some country Churches and Chapels. At the same time I have to regret the unsuitable material and inappropriate character of most of them, and the objectionable and irregular positions they occupy. The ancient position of the baptismal font, near the entrance door, is the most convenient and most significant one that can be given to it, as the	WIKI
Solved I NEED A SCRIPT IN POWERSHELL TO MOVE INACTIVE COMPUTERS TO ANOTHER OU Posted on 2014-11-19 18 852 Views Last Modified: 2014-12-22 I'm trying to complete an AD cleanup. I have already the list of all inactive computers and users that should be moved to another OU, let's call it "DISABLED COMPUTERS" and "DISABLED USERS". This can't be done using GPO and I have no previous experience in scripting, so I will greatly appreciate if anyone of you can provide me a script or the steps to create one that can achieve that purpose. In summary this is what I need: 1. Check for the destination OU if not present create it. 2. Check for the users who meet the criteria if found move to that OU. 3. Check users in the destination OU and if more than x days then delete. 0 Comment Question by:Hunter24 • 8 • 7 • 2 18 Comments LVL 9 Accepted Solution by: RantCan earned 150 total points ID: 40453629 I know you asked for powershell, but I have had good luck with Solarwinds Free Stale AD Users/Computers tool. http://www.solarwinds.com/products/freetools/ad_admin_tools.aspx This does what you request of the PSS. 0 LVL 29 Assisted Solution by:becraig becraig earned 350 total points ID: 40455566 I have one question here, what is the qualifier you plan to use for inactive accounts ? We can either check for where accounts have the disabled flag or for accounts (user and computer) which either have not "logged on for x days". Once you let me know which route you plan to take, I can proceed to complete the script today for testing. 0 Author Comment by:Hunter24 ID: 40455922 becraig: I'll be using the "not logged on for X days" qualifier. I have more than 80 machines that are inactive but not being flagged at all. All inactive users are now disabled but I'll need to move them to an OU and after a year of these accounts become inactive proceed to delete them. Just let me know what else is needed. Thank you. 0 Free eBook: Backup on AWS Everything you need to know about backup and disaster recovery with AWS, for FREE! LVL 29 Assisted Solution by:becraig becraig earned 350 total points ID: 40456235 #Import AD Module Import-Module ActiveDirectory #define the time window --- we specify 90 days plus the official windows lag of 14 days $time = (Get-Date).Adddays(-104) #Check for existence of OU and create if not present [string] $Path = 'OU=OUName,DC=domain,DC=com' try { if (!([adsi]::Exists("LDAP://$Path"))) { #Create OU since it does not yet exist NEW-ADOrganizationalUnit “StaleComputers” –path “OU=SomeOU, DC=domain, DC=com” } else { Write-Debug "OU Already Exists: $Path" } } catch [Exception] { return $_.Exception.Message } #now we proceed to check for computers Get-ADComputer -Filter { LastLogonTimeStamp -lt $time } \| Move-ADObject -TargetPath $Path -WhatIf #Now we check for inactive computers that are inactive Search-ADAccount -accountinactive -ComputersOnly \| ? { $_.lastlogondate -lt $time } \| Move-ADObject -TargetPath $Path -WhatIf Open in new window I need to take a look at creating a time-stamp in one of the extended fields for the AD object so we can determine when to delete as you indicate above, I probably think also adding a piece to remove group memberships as well would be a good plugin. I will look at it when I get home this evening. 0 Author Comment by:Hunter24 ID: 40458394 becraig: Ok. thank you so much. As soon as you have completed it I'll check it. 0 Author Comment by:Hunter24 ID: 40458454 RantCan: Thank you for your posting. I downloaded and tested this Solarwinds tool. The interface is very simple and the query was completed very quickly; it showed me exactly the same results that I got using AD Tidy. However, the only option available is just to remove the inactive computers, I rather prefer to have these objects disabled in another OU and after a certain amount of time delete them. Is there any other free tool that does that and that you recommend? 0 Author Comment by:Hunter24 ID: 40462651 Hi becraig: Do you have the final script so I can test it? 0 LVL 29 Expert Comment by:becraig ID: 40462662 I will have it in a bit, sorry was out for the weekend. 0 LVL 9 Assisted Solution by:RantCan RantCan earned 150 total points ID: 40462857 I did some work with AD Tidy; it does indeed have the ability to add a task sequence to move a found entity to a specified OU, which the Solarwinds tool does not. 1 Author Comment by:Hunter24 ID: 40463005 RantCan: I see what you mean, I need to customize the actions to be executed. That for sure will help me a lot, specially for inactive computers; all inactive user accounts are disabled and they are not as much as computers accounts. However, I still need to find the way to exclude some service accounts that were included in the report. I'll also need to test this in a virtual environment before doing the real thing in a prod environment. Thanks a lot, any other comment or idea is always welcome! 0 LVL 29 Assisted Solution by:becraig becraig earned 350 total points ID: 40463069 Ok so before I complete this I think one of the other solutions might be less heavy lifting. The first thing you would have to do is to create a custom attribute in AD so we could place the timestamp there when we disable a user or computer account. That would involve schema modification, but would make it easier to do your periodic check for deletion. Here is some info, let me know if you still want to try that route. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBkQlTUsXww We would create the custom field disableddate in the AD then once updated we can edit the script to set that value once the user account or computer account is disabled then simply delete after X days. 0 LVL 29 Assisted Solution by:becraig becraig earned 350 total points ID: 40464886 On second thought I just realized I could probably update one of the other already present fields and then simply query that value. I will make a quick test today. 0 LVL 29 Assisted Solution by:becraig becraig earned 350 total points ID: 40465352 So here is a quick look at something that should work (I am updating the upn of the user and computer account with the date for deletion later): #Import AD Module Import-Module ActiveDirectory #Define Arrays $Computers = @() $users = @() $ddate = "Disabled@" + (Get-Date -format yyyyMMdd) #define the time window --- we specify 90 days plus the official windows lag of 14 days $time = (Get-Date).Adddays(-104) #Check for existence of OU and create if not present [string] $Path = 'OU=OUName,DC=domain,DC=com' try { if (!([adsi]::Exists("LDAP://$Path"))) { #Create OU since it does not yet exist NEW-ADOrganizationalUnit “StaleComputers” –path “OU=SomeOU, DC=domain, DC=com” } else { Write-Debug "OU Already Exists: $Path" } } catch [Exception] { return $_.Exception.Message } #now we proceed to check for computers $computers += Get-ADComputer -Filter { LastLogonTimeStamp -lt $time } \| select distinguishedname, samaccountname, userprincipalname $users += Get-ADUser -Filter { LastLogonTimeStamp -lt $time } \| select distinguishedname, samaccountname, userprincipalname #Now we check for inactive computers that are inactive $computers += Search-ADAccount -accountinactive -ComputersOnly \| ? { $_.lastlogondate -lt $time } \| select distinguishedname, samaccountname, userprincipalname $users += Search-ADAccount -accountinactive -UsersOnly \| ? { $_.lastlogondate -lt $time } \| select distinguishedname, samaccountname, userprincipalname $computers \| % { #Move the object in AD Move-ADObject -Identity $_.distinguishedname -TargetPath $path -WhatIf #Change the upn to the disabled date Set-ADComputer -Identity $_.distinguishedname -userprincipalname $ddate -WhatIf #Disable the account Disable-ADAccount -Identity $_.distinguishedname -WhatIf } $users \| % { #Move the object in AD Move-ADObject -Identity $_.distinguishedname -TargetPath $path -WhatIf #Change the upn to the disabled date Set-ADUser -Identity $_.distinguishedname -userprincipalname $ddate -WhatIf #Disable the account Disable-ADAccount -Identity $_.distinguishedname -WhatIf } #now we check for computers in the AD in our OU that meet the date criteria Get-ADComputer –Filter “Name –like ‘*’”–SearchBase $Path \| % { $timer = ($_.userprincipalname).split("@")[1] if ($timer -gt (Get-date).AddDays(-100)) {Remove-ADObject -Identity $_.distinguishedname } } Open in new window 0 Author Comment by:Hunter24 ID: 40465545 becraig: Thanks for your support on this, I'll like to test this script when it is completed. I'm using the AD Tidy app for the cleanup because I need to complete this task next week, after the month closing. However, once this is done I prefer to test this script and put in the the prod environment so that the task is automated. I'll be waiting your feedback. 0 LVL 29 Assisted Solution by:becraig becraig earned 350 total points ID: 40465557 I will let you know once I complete a quick test of it, from first run it works as expected but I need to ensure there are no glitches. I will probably have some time on the plane tonight so I might go ahead and clean it up and post an update. 0 Assisted Solution by:Hunter24 Hunter24 earned 0 total points ID: 40504917 Thank you all again! 0 Author Closing Comment by:Hunter24 ID: 40512630 Thank you all, becraig did a great job with the script but I prefered to use a simpler solution as the one recommended by RantCan 0 Featured Post U.S. Department of Agriculture and Acronis Access With the new era of mobile computing, smartphones and tablets, wireless communications and cloud services, the USDA sought to take advantage of a mobilized workforce and the blurring lines between personal and corporate computing resources. Question has a verified solution. If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question Background Information Recently I have fixed file server permission issues for one of my client. The client has 1800 users and one Windows Server 2008 R2 domain joined file server with 12 TB of data, 250+ shared folders and the folder structure i… The Nano Server Image Builder helps you create a custom Nano Server image and bootable USB media with the aid of a graphical interface. Based on the inputs you provide, it generates images for deployment and creates reusable PowerShell scripts that … This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The… This tutorial will walk an individual through setting the global and backup job media overwrite and protection periods in Backup Exec 2012. Log onto the Backup Exec Central Administration Server. Examine the services. If all or most of them are stop… 679 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days. Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions. Join & Ask a Question	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
SANDS: Nakamura soars in all-GM play in Wijk - Washington Times Democrats decree death in the swamp for the Dreamers Immigration and 'rathole' countries Fearful Dems preemptively strike State of Union In one of the most impressive performances by an American player in decades, GMHikaru Nakamura on Sunday won the 73rd Tata Steel Wijk aan Zee premiere section over an all-grandmaster field that included world champion Viswanathan Anand, former world champion Vladimir Kramnik and world No. 1 Magnus Carlsen of Norway. YESSSSSS! was Nakamura's succinct tweeted summary of his result after drawing with China's GM Wang Hao in the 13th and final round to finish at 9-4, a half-point ahead of Anand and a full point clear of Carlsen and Armenian star Levon Aronian. Nakamura's 2879-rated performance (marred only by a loss to Carlsen) cements his position among the world's elite and puts the 23-year-old St. Louis resident squarely in the mix for potential challengers for the world title. Czech GM David Navara and English GM Luke McShane shared the honors in the B section, while young Italian GM Daniele Vocaturo overcame three losses to capture the C section by a half-point over 15-year-old rising Ukrainian star Ilya Nyzhnyk. Critical to Nakamura's triumph in Wijk was his Round 10 win over French GM Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, a bounce-back win after the American's loss to Carlsen and a shaky draw with Anand. In a heavily trafficked Grunfeld Exchange line, Nakamura as White takes a rarely traveled side street with 13. Bg5!? Qd7 14. Bh6 Bb7 15. Bxg7, using three bishop moves to eliminate Black's fianchettoed bishop. The French GM quickly loses his way, as his intended 18…Qxd5? 19. fxg6 Rd7 runs into 20. Qe3! Qxd3 21. Qxe5+ Kg8 22. Qe6+ Kh8 23. Rad1 Qxd1 24. Rxd1 Rxd1+ 25. Kf2 hxg6 26. Nf4, with an overwhelming attack. But his rash 18…c4?! (if nothing else, this dooms the Black knight on a5 to irrelevance for the rest of the proceedings) 19. Bc2 gxf5 20. Rad1, all but forces the ugly 20…f4 just to keep the White knight out of g3. Analyzing the game later, Nakamura said he considered White already positionally won, and the subsequent play bears him out. White's forces quickly take up dominating positions, and the payoff is not long in coming: 24. Rg1+ Kf8 25. Be4 Bc8 26 Nd4 Qf6?! (anticipating 27. Qg2, but Nakamura thought 26…Ree7 might have held out longer) 27. Ne6+!, when 27…Ke7 loses to 28. Nc7 Rd8 29. d6+ Rxd6 30. Nd5+. Black's game collapses anyway on 27…Bxe6 28. dxe6 Qxe6 29. Bd5 Qh3 30. Bxf7 Qxf3+ 31. Rg2 Kxf7 32. Qd7+ Kf6 (Re7 33. Qf5+ Ke8 34. Qc8+ Kf7 35. Qg8+ Kf6 36. Qf8+ Rf7 37. Qd6+ Kf5 38. Rd5+ Ke4 39. Qe5 mate) 33. Qg7+, and Black resigns as 33…Ke6 (Kf5 34. Qf7+ Ke5 35. Qxe8+) 34. Re1+ Kd5 35. Rxe8 Qf1+ 36. Rg1 Qf3+ 37. Qg2 stops the checks and wins easily. – Another choice illustration of the importance of the fianchettoed bishop comes courtesy of a major upset scored last week at the strong Gibraltar Masters open tournament. Former women's world champ Antoaneta Stefanova was rocked on Gibraltar by unheralded Spanish master Francisco Garcia Jimenez, with the defender's missing long-diagonal bishop again critical to the final assault. Black is the early aggressor in this Closed Sicilian, building up pressure on the queen-side and forcing White's knights into a defensive crouch. But 13. h3 h6 illustrates a nagging problem for Stefanova - she'd like to castle king-side but constantly must be wary of White's bishop-queen battery on the c1-h6 diagonal. Having survived Black's first wave, White switches to the attack, and tactical melee quickly ensues: 17…0-0 18. f5!? (wasting no time opening lines to the Black king) exf5 19. Bxh6 c4+ 20. d4 bxc3 21. bxc3 Bxh6 (the fianchettoed bishop makes an untimely exit, as the White queen takes up a most menacing post) 22. Qxh6 Nxd4?!, the move Black clearly had been counting on. Stefanova's combination picks up a rook but ends up costing her her king: 23. cxd4 Qxd4+ 24. Ne3 Qxa1? (losing, but 24…f4?! also appears to fall short to 26. Nd5!! Qxe1+ 27. Bf1 Qxg3+ 28. Kh1) 25. Nd5! (already with the threat of 26. Ne7 mate) Qe5 (see diagram; also insufficient was 25…f6 26. Ne7+ Kf7 27. exf5 Qd4+ 28. Kh2 Ke8 29. Nxc8+ Kd7 30. Re7+ Kxc8 31. Qxf8 mate) 26. exf5!!, offering a second rook - with check - to secure a crushing attack. The finale: 26…Qxe1+ 27. Kh2 f6 (Qe5 28. f6! leads to mate) 28. Qxg6+ Kh8 29. Nxf6 Rxf6 30. Qxf6+ Kh7 31. Qg6+ Kh8 32. Qh6+, and Black gave up as 32…Kg8 33. Bd5+ cleans house. 73rd Tata Chess Tournament, Wijk aan Zee, Netherlands, January 2011 White: NakamuraBlack: Vachier-Lagrave 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 Bg7 7. Bc4 c5 8. Ne2 Nc6 9. Be3 O-O 10. O-O Na5 11. Bd3 b6 12. Qd2 e5 13. Bg5 Qd7 14. Bh6 Bb7 15. Bxg7 Kxg7 16. d5 f5 17. f3 Rf7 18. exf5 c4 19. Bc2 gxf5 20. Rad1 f4 21. g3 Qd6 22. gxf4 exf4 23. Kh1 Re8 24. Rg1+ Kf8 25. Be4 Bc8 26. Nd4 Qf6 27. Ne6+ Bxe6 28. dxe6 Qxe6 29. Bd5 Qh3 30. Bxf7 Qxf3+ 31. Rg2 Kxf7 32. Qd7+ Kf6 33. Qg7+ 1-0 Gibraltar Masters, Gibraltar, January 2011 White: Garcia JimenezBlack: Stefanova 1. e4 g6 2. Nc3 Bg7 3. g3 c5 4. Bg2 Nc6 5. d3 Rb8 6. Be3 d6 7. Qd2 b5 8.Nge2 b4 9. Nd1 Qb6 10. O-O e6 11. a3 a5 12. axb4 axb4 13. h3 h6 14. c3 Nge715. Re1 Na5 16. Nc1 Nec6 17. f4 O-O 18. f5 exf5 19. Bxh6 c4+ 20. d4 bxc321. bxc3 Bxh6 22. Qxh6 Nxd4 23. cxd4 Qxd4+ 24. Ne3 Qxa1 25. Nd5 Qe5 26.exf5 Qxe1+ 27. Kh2 f6 28. Qxg6+ Kh8 29. Nxf6 Rxf6 30. Qxf6+ Kh7 31. Qg6+Kh8 32. Qh6+ 1-0 David R. Sands can be reached at 202/636-3178 or by e-mail at [email protected] Copyright 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission. Click to Read More Click to Hide Terms of Use / Privacy Policy	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions/Archive/2013/March New image of an old press release What is the copyright status of a new photograph of an old (1977) press release? A new editor wants to upload his 2013 photograph of a paper press release from The Kitchen, dated October 6th and 8th 1977. The editor has not uploaded the image yet because I told him I want to check to see if there would be a copyright problem or not. I don't even know if a paper press release (which was sent out to journalists) is a "publication" or not. Invertzoo (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC) * Yup, that's a publication, and fully subject to copyright; taking a photo of it would not enable us to circumvent the copyright involved. -- Orange Mike \| Talk 17:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC) * Unless the press release had a copyright notice, which is highly unlikely since that would defeat its purpose, it should be PD, template "pd-pre1978." Press releases were intended to be published freely.--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC) * Good point, watcher! -- Orange Mike \| Talk 19:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC) * Thanks so much Wikiwatcher1 and Orange Mike! So it is indeed in the Public Domain, and should be templated as "pd-pre1978" when it is uploaded. Great! Thanks again! Invertzoo (talk) 13:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC) * The editor had trouble getting the Upload Wizard to accept that template. Any idea why? Invertzoo (talk) 22:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC) * The template is case sensitive. Try "PD-Pre1978" with the double brackets on each side.--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC) He did put it in like that, but I think he selected the wrong one of the 6 alternatives as to "why you have the right to publish this work". Invertzoo (talk) 22:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Possible copyright violation. File:Crookes-maltese-tube.jpg This file is shown as being the creator's own work with a copyright notice allowing free use. The picture is in fact a frame grab from somebody else's work. The original video can be found on You Tube, here. I B Wright (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * This image is on Commons, so questions are better asked at Commons:Commons talk:Licensing. That being said, it's definitely a copyvio, so I've tagged it for speedy deletion. Nyttend (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * Update: I take part of it back, the You Tube video referenced above is not the original video. There are several videos on You Tube uploaded by different people showing the same sequence. I have tracked the sequence back to an instructional video on cathode rays produced by (and showing a copyright notice dated 2008 from) Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (En: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro). The original video does not seem to be available on the Internet. I B Wright (talk) 15:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC) what tag should be used Hie, I am not sure of which tag should be used to describe my picture. I am writing an article on behalf of a solicitor whose picture needs to be uploaded on wikipedia. I got an error message stating that proper license tag has not been described. I am not sure which tag is appropriate for this type of image. Image description: Portrait of a person showing his full face. Source is his website and author is himself. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drunkhead (talk • contribs) 15:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * You need to get the copyright holder, who probably is not the subject but the photographer who took the photo, verify their freely licenced permission by following the procedure found at WP:CONSENT. ww2censor (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * I will also add that the subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines so don't be surprised if the draft is rejected.--ukexpat (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Picture source Hello, I am more or less new here, and I have never changed a picture. I am updating a page of a chess Grandmaster and i want to change his picture, but i am not sure about those rights, which picture i can post and what source i should put. So here is the link of the picture, and I am waiting for further instructions. http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&sa=X&biw=1440&bih=775&tbm=isch&tbnid=8h4mkVGHnUYZTM:&imgrefurl=http://www.chess.com/news/magnus-carlsen-wins-tata-steel-2013-1412%3Fpage%3D3&docid=LImYkeSqFYtEOM&imgurl=http://files.chesscomfiles.com/images_users/tiny_mce/SonofPearl/Tata%2525202013%252520Round%25252013%252520Pentala%252520Harikrishna.jpg&w=635&h=720&ei=r_YwUa2zLszLsga-hoE4&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:46,s:0,i:231&iact=rc&dur=766&sig=114586334571911802549&page=2&tbnh=182&tbnw=152&start=22&ndsp=31&tx=70&ty=67 Thank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maheshe4 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * If you didnt take the picture, you probably cannot post it. The two major exceptions would be if the picture is very old (~70 years since its original publication) and so it has become part of the public domain, or if the creator of the photo has specifically published it under one of the free-use licences (such a Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License). -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * The image you found is linked from this webpage but I wonder if you noticed there is a copyright notice at the bottom of the page. The image is unlikely to be freely licenced. ww2censor (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Request for comment - press photos I've posted an RFC regarding the public domain status of press/publicity photos produced between 1923 and 1977. Comments are welcome. – JBarta (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC) File — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saifullahrony (talk • contribs) 12:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Chemistry Structures I've been helping move images to the Commons and concerning these images (File:Rebaudioside A.gif, File:Mogroside II E.gif, and File:Mogroside VI.gif), are they complex enough to qualify for copyright or do they still fall under PD-chem? And if they do fall under PD-chem, should I change it from the current copyright when I transfer them to the commons? ALH (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC) * The structure can't be copyrighted, and the representation of that structure is using standard, non-original graphics and text. They would qualify as PD-chem. (As a counter example, protein structures like File:Protein folding.png may be non-copyrightable but the specific graphics approach is far from simple and has originality to it, and thus this specific representation could be copyrighted (in the example, the user put it into the PD). --M ASEM (t) 00:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC) * Thanks, that helps a lot. ALH (talk) 00:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC) * Clarification: Images like those three are not protected by copyright in the United States. However, they might be protected by copyright in some other countries, so any free licences should be preserved so that the images also can be used in those countries. You should not have removed the free licences when moving the files to Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2013 (UTC) * Well, in the case of File:Rebaudioside A.gif, the user uploaded it under a GNU free license so that shouldn't matter. Again, we are talking about data here with a standard format and representation, so copyrightability anywhere is likely not an issue. But there could be prior case law that I'm not aware of. --M ASEM (t) 02:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC) * Yes, but removed the GNU and Creative Commons licences when copying the images to Commons. Commons users also need to see those licences in case some country grants copyright protection to images like these. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC) * Anyone making an accurate standard diagram of those three molecules will produce something exactly like these these images; barring rotation, font changes, and zoom (which aren't by themselves copyrightable), any changes will make the diagram non-standard and/or inaccurate. They're no more original than the formulas themselves; writing "C12H22O11" by itself can't make you a copyright infringer, and neither can drawing a figure like File:Saccharose2.svg. Nyttend (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC) * It all depends on the threshold of originality in the country where you wish to use the images. For example, the images might be protected by a typographical copyright in the United Kingdom, and without a free licence, people in the United Kingdom won't know that they can use the images. Lots of British people use this website, and there is no point in hiding licensing information which those people need in order to use the contents on Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC) * Typographical copyright does not apply, it refers to something different. I have no doubt that the above reasoning applies just as well in the UK as it does in the United States. Other countries though I can't speak for and there may therefore be good reasoning keeping the tags. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 10:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC) * I guess I could have worded it better, but my question had more to do with if these particular images could be copyrighted than the tags. I have no objection to changing the tags back, however I do have these three points to make on the matter. 1. In the Wikipedia Manual of Style that I found after I asked the question (Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing), it states that A) these diagrams should be uploaded to Wikimedia (which isn't the concern here) and B) these diagrams "must have a correct copyright tag: please add PD-chem" This isn't binding, but it's what Wikipedia prefers with these images. 2. In this case, the images are very clearly in the public domain, which means that adding any tag other than a public domain could be confusing (and downright misleading) to someone who isn't familiar with public domain laws. In addition, any accurate model of these molecules will be highly similar to these images, however there wouldn't be any copyright infringement, simply because the creator of these images can't copyright them. 3. Finally, under 17 USC §506 (c), it is illegal to place "on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false." Now, I do admit it was a little brash on my part to change the copyright tags (and I will go explain to the uploader why I did so and that they can change the tags back if they so choose), however I believe all of my points remain valid. A. L. H. 04:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC) * 17 USC §506 (c) looks problematic since a work may be protected by copyright in one country but not in some other country. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Images of newspaper "letters to editor", where text has been released by original author In September 1994, a person wrote to the letters page of the Daily Telegraph, and his letter was published. It's possible that the newspaper edited his letter for brevity or clarity, as most newspapers reserve the right to do. In any case, I now have in front of me a hard copy of what the newspaper published (his letter). It is likely that the person may wish to freely license the text of his letter to the newspaper. If he does so, would it be acceptable for me to upload an image of how the newspaper printed his letter? (The purpose is to represent the sort of correspondence that occurred, in an article section that largely focuses on such correspondence and reactions to it.) For clarity, as far as I can see, the only creative input the newspaper had into the depiction of the letter was their choice of font (which had been standard for a long time and was probably the same in the rest of the newspaper, so not exactly a creative choice), their convention of printing the name of the writer in all upper case, their listing of his address as "London W14" (both of these standards used by their newspaper for decades) and their three-word title to his letter. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC) * There are two issues as far as I see. One is whether you sign away more than a right of republishing to The Daily Telegraph, one of exclusivity or even copyright incompatible with a free licence. Secondly, in Britain there is a typographical copyright that might extend to the work in question. I don't think the US recognises such a thing, however, so on en.wiki that would probably not be a problem. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 12:39, 24 February 2013 (UTC) * it is not just a choice of font. it is choosing where to break words or where to kern, where to place it on the page, where to break the columns. I am not really sure what a picture of words provides that words alone cannot do.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC) * All that falls under typographic copyright, and none of it is protected by copyright in the US. As per ownership of copyright above, no modern copyright system has implicit transfers of copyright from a non-employee, especially as there was no form of payment to the author.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Fair use of career images vs. post-retirement images In adding a fair use image, where the only free image of a person available shows them in their later years after retiring, is it acceptable to include one showing the person working during their career as fair use? Some examples might be sports figures, actors, or military notables. I assume that NFCC #1 is the most relevant criteria: Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. Since in order to be included in WP, someone must be notable, it follows that the person's notability relies on what they did during their career. Hence, a photo of them during their career actively engaged in some profession, has value independent of and probably more important than a free, but recent image when they're retired. I'd like to know if those factors have been covered before? --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 04:54, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * A while back, I floated the idea of making a specific policy allowing this. The basic response I got was that our policy already does for the reason you stated. Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 9. Ryan Vesey 05:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * The argument for their use has to start with how much the visual aspect of the person was during the time of their career. This would be arguable for people like actors and possibly sport figures, but not for people like authors, scientists, etc. --M ASEM (t) 05:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * I just read through the Village pump discussion, but I didn't see that they came to any clear decision. I guess a theoretical example, but relevant to countless notables, might help, so here goes: * Joe DiMaggio played baseball for about 15 years of his 84 years of life. Let's assume this is 1999 and he is still alive, and someone added a free image of him at some event when he was 84. Like many notables now, assuming it was the only free image, it would probably be his lead image. But what if someone found another published photo of him taken 50 years earlier while he was actually playing. My understanding, and experience, found that if the non-free photo was uploaded, it gets deleted due to NFCC#1 (being that he was still alive.) * It's not simply a matter of them being in their "prime" or how important their "looks" were to their career. One image shows them in retirement at a podium, while the other shows them doing what they are notable for, and what got them an article in WP. To me it seems logical, if not almost mandatory, to allow fair use images in those cases. And there are photos of writers, like Hemingway and Shaw, at work writing. There are photos of actors acting and scientists at work. So it's not just a matter of showing their face, or how they appeared, but of showing them in action, doing what they are notable for. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 05:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC) * See WP:NFC §1. Non-free images may be acceptable if the person currently looks very different to what he looked like when he did what he is famous for. For example, if you participated in some kind of sports 50 years ago and then retired, then you would usually look very different to how you look today. Also, some health problems (like Viktor Yushchenko) may change your visual appearance significantly. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Can a submittor require attribution on the article page? re : File:Bat Creek Exam 5-28-10.JPG - can the submittor require under image attribution? or is attribution via page history appropriate? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC) * No, see WP:CREDITS, attribution on the image information page is deemed sufficient.--ukexpat (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2013 (UTC) * In this case, there is no need for additional attribution in the article. But in general the author may always specify how to attribute their work, and I remember a case on Commons where someone asked for attribution with a weblink "next to the image". So it could happen. I have now updated the license tag at Commons to reflect Scott Wolter's wish. De728631 (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC) * On the other hand, if the uploader does request attribution next to the image, I would assume that the image can't be used on English Wikipedia at all, since WP:CREDITS says that you shouldn't put the uploader's name there. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC) How do I know if an audio recording is available to use for business purposes? I found a recording I would like to use in my business (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gesualdo-moro_lasso_al_mio_duolo.ogg). I know I can use music in the public domain, but many of your recordings do not appear to indicate what usage is appropriate. Can you tell me if the recording I am describing can be used for business purposes? <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 14:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC) * All media at Wikimedia Commons can be used for commercial purposes. This specific file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license, so depending on your intended business, I can say the following: * You can use it for commercial purposes like remixing, or all kinds of alterations, but in that case you must distribute it under that same Creative Commons license or a similar one. * You can play it to the public. * In any case you'll have to credit the MIT Choir and William Cutter (director). * De728631 (talk) 16:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC) SVG files Check File:Frog design logo.svg. This is a logo which is clearly below the threshold of originality and thus in the public domain, but it is listed as a copyrighted file. However, the problem is that it is an SVG file. Does the person who made the SVG file hold the copyright to the SVG source code as a computer program? If so, then the file should be tagged as replaceable fair use as the copyrighted SVG source code can be replaced by freely licensed SVG code. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Copyright of sports Check File:WalsallWood.ogv. This film shows part of a match. Is the match itself protected by copyright? That is, does this film violate the copyright of the sports clubs and/or the individual players? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC) * It isnt a matter of copyright, it is a matter of other issues, see commons:Commons:Photographs of identifiable people Werieth (talk) 06:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC) File:International Scout and Guide Fellowship.svg I created this SVG of a previously existing file, File:International Scout and Guide Fellowship.png, and simply copied the licensing information. I was notified that I had not provided ownership of copyright information and was required to answer the following three questions: * Who created this image? * Who holds the copyright to this image? * Where did this image come from? I have since updated the information, but am unsure if what I added is sufficient. Could someone please read through it and inform me if I need to add more? Thanks, Frigid Ninja 01:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC) * These messages came from a bot that might have been triggered by the combination of fair use and svg. I have now added two disclaimers about rendering of the image, SVG-Logo and SVG-res, and also your name as the creator of the SVG version. So that should do it. De728631 (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC) richardcorfieldscientist.jpg Hi, I would like to add this image to my page. File:Small RMC pub shot 2.jpg It was taken in 2002 by a photographer working for DOX Productions (a TV production compnay). The photographer gave me his permission to use the photo freely as he was instructed to by David Sington of Dox Productions who he was working for at the time. I have used it many times over the years including on the web and would like to use it on my wikipedia page. There seems to a problem uploading it. Any assistance you can give me would be very welcome. Thanks, Richard CorfieldClemrit (talk) 11:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC) * Please send evidence of the copyright holder's permission using the process set out at WP:IOWN. Also, it is not "your" article, it is an article about you.--ukexpat (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2013 (UTC) File:Clamato can.jpg Hi. Per request on my talk page I added a non-free-use rationale to the image page. The rationale is being disputed, but I don’t understand why. My rationale seems quite clear. Please respond, as I am not actively checking my watch list. —Michael Z. 2013-03-06 16:38 z * You need to add a Non-free use rationale template to the image info page, see Template:Non-free use rationale for the documentation]].--ukexpat (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC) * Thanks. It never occurred to me that “clarifying the reason” meant there was a mandatory template I was supposed to know about. —Michael Z. 2013-03-06 20:47 z * I don't think it's mandatory per se but it is useful as it contains all the essential elements per WP:NFCC and users are used to seeing non-free rationales in that format.--ukexpat (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC) * I have added a trademark template and have removed photo of art, since the original artwork on the can was not released under a GFDL license. Please note also that we can't use high-res images for non-free use purposes so I have replaced it with a smaller version. De728631 (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2013 (UTC) * Please also note that images like this have two copyrights (the copyright of the photographer and the copyright of the can artist), and licences need to be indicated for both copyrights. Normally, this is done using the template Photo of art. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC) WP:NFCC and WP:LINKVIO Once in a while, I see people linking directly to an image in a fair use rationale. For example, File:1953 Playboy centerfold.jpg links to an external website where the image is used without permission from the copyright holder (depending on a fair use claim). WP:LINKVIO seems to forbid links directly to fair use images as the use is unfair outside the original context. In the same manner, I would not be surprised you can't link to the page on the website where the image is used if the purpose is to link to the image, as the other information on the page would be uninteresting in this situation. This means that the link has to be removed per WP:LINKVIO. Problem: If the link is removed, then the image suddenly fails WP:NFCC. In this case, the solution is easy: the image comes from a printed publication, so all you need to do is to indicate the name and issue number. However, there are lots of images where this wouldn't be feasible. For example, we have several hundreds of links to Find a Grave, and that website usually doesn't tell where the images come from. For example, how do you fix File:Adolph Toepperwein.jpg so that it neither violates WP:NFCC nor WP:LINKVIO? --Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC) * I think this is being excessively legalistic. * Somebody uploading an image here should say where they got it from, as well as the original source. That ought to be basic, and information that should not be removed. * The purpose of WP:LINKVIO is to prevent contributory copyright infringement. But that is not the purpose or the effect of the link in this case -- there is already a copy of the image here, so it is not as if we are inducing to the reader to go to the site and illicitly consume the image (unlike, say, a bootleg copy of a book or a paper) -- they don't need to do that, because they can already see it here. * So it seems to me that here we should follow WP:IAR and the fifth of WP:5, and think what the rule is for, and then ask whether that actually applies in this case. * Having done that, I think it is appropriate to keep the link. In my view, for better or for worse, it is right to have a full-disclosure audit trail of where the pixels actually came from. Jheald (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Best in Film: The Greatest Movies of Our Time This page has lists of favorites, so are these lists copyrighted? --George Ho (talk) 01:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC) * Reading the page, the lists are based on fan-voted favorites. In this case, that means its factual data, and thus not subject to copyright issues. --M ASEM (t) 02:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC) File:Ph_seal_cavite.png and others I was trying to add File:Ph_seal_cavite.png, File:Ph_seal_batangas.png, File:Ph_seal_rizal.png and File:Ph_seal_quezon.png to the CALABARZON page but I got a message saying that these images failed the non-fair use policy. I checked the images and they all have fair-use rationales for the said page, so I'm guessing there's something I'm not getting? Thanks. NyanThousand (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC) * The usage violates WP:NFTABLE which says that such images usually aren't permitted in tables. * Philippine government images are problematic. Wikipedia thinks that they are unfree (see Template:Non-free Philippines government) but Commons thinks that they are in the public domain (Commons:Template:PD-PhilippinesGov). --Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Yachats photos Can someone take a look at the images used in the Yachats, Oregon article? Some are on Commons and others are still on Wikipedia and tagged for transfer. I've gone through a few of them and tagged two—File:Amanda's Trail.jpg and File:Yachats Little Log Church.jpg—for deletion with npd. I notified the uploader for the first image and then realized it would be kind of rude to keep posting notices. At least two of the images in the article are claimed to have been taken by "Elizabeth Gates," who probably isn't User:Crankelwitz (who uploaded many) and others are claimed to be by Dave Baldwin. In addition, this user on Commons, who uploaded at least one of the photos, seems to have some connection to the aforementioned Dave Baldwin. I'm unsure how to handle this. Jsayre64 (talk) 04:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Question about blueprints Your input at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Star_Trek would be appreciated. --EEMIV (talk) 05:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Cover of non-copyrighted book I would like to use an image of the cover of a book written by the person who is the subject of a biography. The date was 1947, author is deceased, published by an academy that closed in the 1970s. Where do I start?? Maineshepp (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC) * The cover of a book is usually not designed by the writer themselves, so you'll have to find out about the artist. If it is just text though without any original graphic design then you won't have to worry. Is there a way to preview this cover online? De728631 (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC) * In the vast majority of cases non-free book covers are only permitted for use, under our non-free policy, in articles about the books themselves and not in other articles. ww2censor (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks. It is just text. I don't see any way to attach the file, as it's on my computer. I think it can visually draw attention to the discussion, underscore its significance. I could upload to Wikipedia if you wish. Maineshepp (talk) 21:05, 4 March 2013 (UTC) * A book cover which is just text is extremely unlikely to add anything to the meaning of a biographical article, and thus would fall foul of our non-free use policy. I'd say no. -- Orange Mike \| Talk 13:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC) A 1947 publication would still generally be in copyright unless there are extenuating circumstances (such as UK Crown Copyright or some other overriding term). The only way I can see the text adding value is if the writing or font was somehow distinguishing or notable, and I can't think of any examples of that off the top of my head. Perhaps the text on an early cover of Mein Kampf (and, having invoked Godwin's law, we can now close this thread) might be significant if it's different from the more common cover. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC) * If it's PD-simple, it may be able to be used for free. The Pleasure of the Text, for example, has a cover which is much too simple to attract copyright in the US. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC) * That's why used the example I did - it was the first one to come to mind when I thought of something using text that was distinctive and might be interpreted as artistic. In your example, you could remake it in MS Paint, for instance, if you were so inclined. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC) * there is a kind of catch-22 going on here that does not bode well for the use. If it is not just text, it is still likely under copyright and not usable in an author article. If it is just simple text, it probably could be used, but the value of such a just text image to an article about the author is nil- so why would you include it?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:16, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * Illustrating a bibliography, like at Lie Kim Hok, or important publications, like at Kafka. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC) CC-BY-SA or GFDL? I’m a media contributor. I just noticed that Wikimedia/Wikipedia listed CC-BY-SA as the recommended license for “own works” under Commons:Special:UploadWizard. Earlier it was CC-BY-SA+GFDL in the old upload form. Is there any specific reason for this change? Further I noticed that now all of our pages have a footnote “Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.” Earlier it was GFDL. Why? J Kadavoor J e e 14:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * I think we prefer - but don't require - CC-BY-SA 3.0 as the best license for reuse of content (particularly as the Creative Commons concept grows wider), but you can always choice the GFDL which in terms of free content re-use is functionally more equivalent. --M ASEM (t) 15:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Are these images correctly licensed? Flickr set. These are images from Halo 4, a video game so I would assume these are copyrighted and thus if I came across an image like this on Flickr normally, I would just move on. However, Corrinne Yu (the uploader) is a programmer at 343 Industries, the copyright owner of the Halo series. She has uploaded images that she has directly worked on. Is it safe to assume that these images are free or would it need to be from the company directly for us to assume it's really free and that she hasn't just made a mistake in licensing? James086 Talk 15:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * You could always contact her to see what the situation is, but your assessment is completely on the ball, that it is not likely her ability to release media in a different copyright than what 343 (and/or Bungie and/or Microsoft) would allow. That said, this is the case of a big developer. I've had a few indie developers offer their shots that they would clearly own on Flickr, which is fine for use her. --M ASEM (t) 15:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * Thanks, I'll ask her but I thought it unlikely. James086 Talk 16:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * Also, these are works for hire from the United States, so she isn't the copyright holder unless her employment contract explicitly says so. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Copyrighted Images In the edit history there are many commons delinker edits. e.g. File: xyz has been removed, it has been deleted from commons by abc. Because: copyright violation. Does this type of edit history affect an article quality? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhajking (talk • contribs) 11:40, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * Why would you think that an article's history would affect the quality of the article itself? Removal of a deleted image may be detrimental to the article and may perhaps spur on editors to find a suitable replacement but images are not a necessary requirement for most articles. ww2censor (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * As you've been told many times in many places already, such edit history does not affect an article's quality. The article is judged by what it is, not what it has been. -- Orange Mike \| Talk 16:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC) Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License Hi. I stumble across this website containing some really good anatomical pictures that we could sure could use at WikiProject Anatomy. In the upper right corner of the website it says; "Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License". I understand that I have to "attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor". The owner of the website states "A resource site for teachers and students". My question is: Is it okay to upload pictures from the website to Commons and use them on Wikipedia, if I specify what the source is (and hence attribute to the author)? If so, would "fair use" (have very little understanding of the concept) limit the number of pictures it would be okay to upload at Commons? Thanks, JakobSteenberg (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * Non-commercial images are not allowed on Commons. All images I've found on the website additionally seem to violate WP:NFCC, so they can't be uploaded here either. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * Okay. Thank you very much for answering my question... and especially so quickly. JakobSteenberg (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC) * Let's not give up so easily. While I understand, and respect the decision to restrict to non-commercial use, I have seen examples where someone wants that restrictions, but also would be very interested in allowing their material to be used in Wikipedia, and end up changing the restriction. It is worth an email to the copyright holders, ideally with a few examples of articles that would use the images, and point out that reducing the restriction, either broadly or on selected images, would allow the images in a much more visible place, thus achieving their educational goals. Some people are unaware that the non-commercial restriction prevents usage on Wikipedia, in some cases they know Wikipedia itself is non-commercial, so assume that images would follow the same rules. It may be as simple as asking.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 14:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC) * That's a fair comment (and something I've had a crack at myself - getting a free image for Bullets and Daffodils), but we still can't upload the file until the commercial reuse has been confirmed. The easiest way is to get whoever holds the copyright to create a WP or Commons account and upload the file themselves. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC) Reach for the Stars (will.i.am song) From what I read on the article, this song was essentially commissioned by NASA. JPL plays the song in its entirety on a JPL produced video at this location that's even downloadable. Is this song technically, therefore, in the public domain (I'm speaking in terms of work-for-hire)? – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 08:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC) * If he wasn't employed by NASA (not merely commissioned), then it's not PD unless the copyright holder (which may or may not be NASA) put it there. (I seem to recall that the JPL, as operated by CalTech, not NASA, adds its own layer of complexity.) Using the song in the entirety on a downloadable video just means that the license that the JPL has to use it extends to that--it does not mean that anyone else has a license to use it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC) * Absolutely correct. The NASA/JPL certainly does not extend to this. One would need a clear license statement that said that will.i.am transferred the rights or the like appropriately. --M ASEM (t) 13:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC) * Fantastic, thanks for the replies. I honestly wasn't sure. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 21:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC) Is this USAF or personal? Regarding File:Brian Shul in the cockpit of the SR-71 Blackbird.jpg, technically this image was very much taken during a Blackbird mission. But I've been wondering for a while now exactly what the copyright status of these images really are. (Apparently, according to outside Blackbird-employee reunions, people were annoyed that he took the time to photograph either himself, etc. during missions.) I would think technically this image is in the PD, but the book I retrieved it from, The Untouchables, does say at the beginning that the images are copyright 1988 Brian Shul, and that no image may be duplicated without written permission from the publishers. But if the images are PD, then wouldn't the reproductions in the book be as well? I know it's this way with paintings; not sure about photographs. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 03:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC) * That's a Commons image; the discussion should be had on Wikimedia Commons, not on Wikipedia.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC) * Fair enough! – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 06:29, 12 March 2013 (UTC) Should all these image files be deleted due to copyright violation? The only source for permission is this (Fig.3) which does not have copyright notice, but it is a link from this which clearly indicates that they reserve all rights. The uploader is not the owner of the image as mentioned in Talk:Inspiration_Mars_Foundation. The uploader is not the owner of the image, but somehow he sets license to CC V.3. The person admitted in this talk page Talk:Inspiration_Mars_Foundation that he hasn't secure the license from the owner prior to the upload. So, this seems to be a clear violation. This file seems to be another version of an image appeared in this (Fig.2) which again is from this link which clearly indicates that they reserve all rights. This file, the uploader claims to represent the logo of Inspiration Mars Foundation with no reliable sources. The uploader claims to be the owner of the image. If that is true, it appears to be a derived work from File:Inspiration Mars Artist's Concept.png with some additions. Not sure if this is distinctive enough for the uploader to claim as separate copyrighted work. I don't think he can claim that as the "Inspiration MARS" part looks just like what the original rendering has. The half circle symbols is probably his own invention, which in itself should never been included in the Wikipedia due to lacking of reliable sources. Note that even on the official web page, they don't have such logo. * File:2018 Inspiration Mars diagram of periapsis.jpg * File:Inspiration Mars Artist's Concept.png * File:Inspiration Mars trajectory.svg * File:Inspiration Mars Foundation working logo.png * I have never dealt with violation issue before so not sure how to proceed. Z22 (talk) 23:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC) * I have marked two of the images as having no evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Unless the uploader proves that he has permission for the images, they will both be deleted in one week. * File:Inspiration Mars trajectory.svg is based on someone else's drawing, but the uploader has modified the drawing and it is not identical to the original image. I would say that the copied part is below the threshold of originality and that it is thus in the public domain. It is in fact likely that the entire drawing is in the public domain. * File:Inspiration Mars Foundation working logo.png is a very simple logo. I would say that this is below the threshold of originality and thus in the public domain. See Commons:COM:TOO. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC) * Thank you. I am thinking of taking the logo image off the article anyway because there is no reliable source to indicate that is in fact their logo. Z22 (talk) 01:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC) File:AlvyRaySmith_Lo-Res.jpg File:AlvyRaySmith_Lo-Res.jpg is a low-resolution 300x300 pixels version of an very high resolution portrait of me by Kathleen King, of Seattle, website www.kathleenkingphotography.com. She has given me rights to use this image anytime anywhere. What else do I have to do? I've tried to incorporate the information just given on the stated image file page, but it keeps getting rejected. It's my image, by Kathleen King, and I have full permissions from her for it. What else can I do? I've put it under Creative Commons 3.0 with attribution. I find the instructions for this VERY difficult to follow, and I'm an imaging whiz supposedly! With great respect for permissions. I like that you are looking out for image rights, but surely there must be an easier way to follow the rules. * Please follow the process set out at WP:IOWN to communicate the permission to Wikipedia for review.--ukexpat (talk) 18:43, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Image copyright problem with File:Colin Pearson bowl.JPG The copyright on this file File:Colin Pearson bowl.JPG has been queried as an image within an image. It is an image of a bowl, produced in quantity by a manufacturer, not an image of a work of art. What is the copyright status of such objects? Pelarmian (talk) 09:26, 6 March 2013 (UTC) To clarify: I would guess that no-one may freely make an object to the same design, but does the maker own the right to reproducing photographic images of the object for the purposes of illustrating his work? Pelarmian (talk) 09:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC) * Compare the Gaylord case, where a sculptor successfully claimed that a picture of his work on a postage stamp, for which the photographer was paid, breached his copyright. The photo of the Pearson bowl is arguably different in two respects: (1) It is a kitchen utensil, not work of art. (2) There is no consideration and the maker (or, more precisely, since the maker is dead, the estate of the maker) has suffered no loss. Pelarmian (talk) 10:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC) Government works of British colonies Do the provisions of PD-BritishGov apply to the works of colonial governments in the British Empire? A long rabbit trail led me to File:QEII Stamp.jpg, which was deleted at PUI because of unclear copyright status. The Scott catalogue tells me that this stamp was issued (i.e. published) on 2 January 1956, so it would definitely be PD-BritishGov if it were a stamp of the United Kingdom instead of being issued for the government of colonial Sierra Leone. Or do we have to apply the copyright laws of Sierra Leone? The image itself is an unoriginal copy of the original stamp; there's no realistic chance for the uploader holding copyright, and the image was uploaded as PD-self anyway. Nyttend (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC) * Do you have an external link to that stamp? Colonial stamps that are over 50 years old should use the crown copyright template PD-BritishGov just like these commons images and other colonies in the parent category. ww2censor (talk) 12:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Opinion, please Can any of the following be re-classified as PD-text? * File:Scarborough RT logo.svg * File:Brescia Mobilita logo.png * File:VIA Metropolitan Transit logo.png * 1) File:Winston-Salem Transit Authority logo.png * Useddenim (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC) * Well the top part of the second one is original enough to qualify for protection. No comment about the others, but I believe stylised lettering is one thing to be more heavily protected in the UK than the US. Where are these from? Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC) * 1) Toronto, Canada * 2) Brescia, Italy * 3) San Antonio, Texas * 4) Winston-Salem, North Carolina * } * Useddenim (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC) * I would say the only one that might qualify as PD-text would be the first one. It appears the 4th one has already been deleted. —JmaJeremy ✆ ✎ 20:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC) * I would say the only one that might qualify as PD-text would be the first one. It appears the 4th one has already been deleted. —JmaJeremy ✆ ✎ 20:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Photographing a book jacket? I would like to illustrate an article on a series of books with illustrations of two or possibly three of the typical dust jacket styles used to aid identification of the books. Is this going to infringe the copyright of the original designer/publisher of the dust jacket or, because it is my photograph, will I hold the copyright of that particular image? The original books were published from 1960-1983 and the designer of the jackets died in 1998. I have not written the article yet. Apologies if the answer is covered elsewhere, I could not see it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Millar (talk • contribs) 11:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC) * There are a couple of issues to consider. * If the books in question are yours, you will want to see wp:COI * If the photograph in question is yours, you were the original holder of the copyright. However, if the photo was used for a book jacket, it is likely that the publisher contractually obtained the rights to the photo, in which case we need a permission statement to accept a free license. * However, it is common, in the case of logos, book jackets, album and cd covers to upload the image, not with a free license, but with a non-free rationale. see Non-free use rationale guidelineThat is likely to be the best option, subject to one question: you mention that this is to illustrate the jacket style. If the photo of yours is just one part of the overall jacket, and there is a creative element to the design, then there is a complication, We have to determine whether it is a joint or composite work. If joint, you have the right to license, if composite, both have to agree. See Media copyright questions/Archive/2012/October. However, non-free use will still apply. * You can send it in to photosubmission –at- Wikimedia.org, where it is likely I will upload it for you and fill out the fair use rationale, but this can only be done when the article exists.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 12:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC) * If, on the other hand, you were not the creator of any of the content of the book jackets, then your photograph is a derivative work and must be used in a way which respects the copyright owner(s) rights (you have almost none of your own in this case, the reproduction of a two-dimensional piece of art). -- Orange Mike \| Talk 20:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Thank you, that is helpful. I realise, though, that I was possibly a little unclear in my original question. I would like to take photographs of a small number of existing book jackets to illustrate an proposed article on the Phoenix Living Poets series. Several of the poets published are significant and have their own pages elsewhere on Wikipedia. I had no involvement at all in the production of the book jackets but it would make the article easier to follow if I could illustrate the two, possibly three, main types of jacket used. I suspect from your helpful responses that I need to develop a non-free rationale once I have at least started the article. Does that sound correct? Thank you again for being so helpful. Steve Millar (talk) 22:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Guide page on legal status of television screen captures Hello. I'm searching for a policy on the copyright status of screen captures from television programs. Specifically, I'd like an official policy stating, if it's true, that screen captures from a television program are derivative works of that program and as such they have the same legal status as the whole program and that such images usually can't be uploaded to commons. I have looked at FAQ/Copyright, Copyrights and Derivative works but found no clear statement. Non-free content talks about fair use policy of such screenshots but also doesn't give a clear statement on the copyright status. I'm asking this because an editor has asked about this on the w:hu Village Pump, and I can't find a policy page to link to. Whether the page is on commons or here doesn't matter. Thanks in advance. – b_jonas 11:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC) * I would have thought that it was inherent to the concept of a derivative work, and that it did not need to be stated explicitly — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC) * Yea, derivative works is a concept in law, not Wiki policy. Commons does have a page about it, Derivative works, which is both about the nature of the law and how it applies to commons. Do note that depending on the Wiki, the language-specific wiki may allow non-free uploads of such that confirm with their equivalent of the Exemption Doctrine Policy as required by the Foundation for each project (see meta:Resolution:Licensing policy); en.wiki has its WP:NFC policy, but I don't know the equivalent elsewhere. --M ASEM (t) 15:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC) File:'The Morning of Sedgemoor' by Edgar Bundy, Tate Britain.JPG This image has been given a CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication by the editor who claims ownership. However its a photograph of an oil painting made in England in 1905, stated to be by Edgar Bundy. There is no information whether its an image of the whole of or just part of the painting. Now according to wikipedia, Bundy died in 1922 which is less than one hundred years ago. So should this image have a Licensed-PD-Art template and does this image has the correct copyright information? The image File:Day of Sedgemoor, The-Edgar Bundy.jpg, for instance, by the same painter claims to be in the public domain in Europe (life of author plus 70 years but it has no information in respect of the USA; whereas File:Stradshp.jpg, also by Bundy, is stated to be in the Public Domain in the USA since it was created prior to 1923. Pyrotec (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2013 (UTC) * The page about the painting at the Tate gives the year as 1905 so that would be over 100 years, and shows the whole painting.— Rod talk 12:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC) * Yes, Rodw but the painter lived until 1922 and in Europe his heirs could have retained UK copyright on the Painting until 1992. Arguably it is out of copyright, but I question as to whether it has the right tags on the image. Pyrotec (talk) 12:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC) * Template:PD-art-life-70 looks to be a suitable template, CC0 seems inappropriate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2013 (UTC) Copyright image - Permission requested but no answer file:John K Castle.jpg is a copyright image owned by John K. Castle and his firm Castle Harlan that John K. Castle has authorized for publication on his wiki page. Permission for mounting this file was requested weeks ago with no answer from Wikipedia. Attempts to mount this image today were rebuffed. What does one do now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlh070945 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 18 March 2013 (UTC) * It needs to be released under a free license see FAQ/Copyright Werieth (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC) * There are currently several hundred e-mails in the permissions queue. Please be patient, there is no deadline.--ukexpat (talk) 17:34, 18 March 2013 (UTC) * I will also say that the article is way too promotional in tone - it reads like the guy's CV, not acceptable.--ukexpat (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC) File:Almyra M73.jpg I recently uploaded File:Almyra M73.jpg, which was given to me by someone at the Arkansas Department of Aeronautics. I have photos for the rest of Arkansas's public use airports but wanted to ensure the proper license before batch uploading. They were taken by the Civil Air Patrol, which is a division of the United States Air Force so I believe Template:PD-USGov-Military-Air Force applies. Could someone with more experience in the area confirm or deny this? Thanks Brandonrush (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC) Painter from Canada who died in 1958 (and a piece ordered by the government) Hello. I'd like to know: (1) What is the copyright status of the works of a Canadian painter who died in 1958? (2) In 1958, before his death, the painter (a resident of Toronto) made a portrait ordered and owned by the province of Ontario (i.e., the government); what is ths copyright status of this work? Thank you, Aviados (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC) * A work by a Canadian painter who died in 1958 left copyright in Canada in 2008. Assuming it was published in his lifetime in Canada and not the US, it will be in copyright in the US for 95 years from when it was published. I'm not sure about the other work; it depends on who held the copyright, I believe.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * What if it was indeed published in his lifetime outside of Canada? And how come 95 years from being published? Aviados (talk) 03:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * Where was it published? You haven't given us nearly enough information. 95 years from publication is the standard copyright duration in the US for works published prior to 1978, with certain limitations to works that were published in the US or were published outside the US and were public domain in their source country in 1996. See .--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * I see. Thank you. Aviados (talk) 13:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC) About File:Babar1.jpg Hi, I'm surprised to see the fair use tag on this one : shouldn't it be PD-old, since the artiste died in 1937, more than 70 years ago ? Regards, Esprit Fugace (talk) 13:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * No. Wikimedia Foundation is US-based, and US copyright law for works published between 1923 and 1977 gives 95 years from publication in the most general case. In this case, Historie of Babar was filed for US copyright (registration AF15370) and properly renewed (registration R229659), meaning it will get the full 95 years and be in copyright until 2027-01-01.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Japanese logos Apparently, logos can be public domain if they only consist of text. However, is this the case according to Japanese law? I'm asking these because of these two logos: this and this, which would appear to be ineligible for copyright in the US. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * This seems in fact to be the case, cf. File:Sony logo.svg. Regardless of the Japanese jurisdiction I'm not sure whether the Kyoto Animation logo is too simple to be copyrighted. The flower emblem may be too complex. But at least for purposes of the English WP with its servers in the United States, the other logo is definitely not in need of a fair use rationale, so I'm going to tranfer it to Commons. De728631 (talk) 13:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * PS: File:P.A. Works logo (square).svg is already available at Commons. De728631 (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * That's weird. I searched it earlier on Commons, and it didn't show up. Weird. Maybe KyoAni's logo needs more discussion? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:37, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * Depends on the logo. Simple logos are in the public domain while complex logos are not. A Japanese court found that File:Asahi logo.svg is too simple to be protected by copyright. In another case, a logo for Sumitomo Kenki was found to be too simple to be copyrighted, although I'm not sure if the court ruling was about the current logo or an earlier one. Not sure about Kyōto Animation. The closest court ruling might be the one about the Cup Noodle packaging where the two middle cups on the bottom row in File:Cup Noodles.jpg were found to be too simple to be copyrighted. See Commons:COM:TOO for details. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Usability of material containing both copyright notice and "Creative Commons Attribution License" This questions concerns the usability of text and (more importantly) images from, which contains this notice: * Copyright: © 2012 Van Horn et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Also, at the bottom of we find * All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Maybe I'm having a senior moment, but isn't there a conflict between the statement of copyright and the Creative Commons permission. As I write that I have the feeling there's not, but now that I've begun I might as well get an answer from the experts. So, can I import images from this article to WP and/or Commons? If so, which of the zillions of licensing tags should I use? (If someone wants to be really kindhearted, he or she might go through the motions on this image to give me an example to work from.) Thanks. EEng (talk) 15:55, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * No, there's no contradiction. Unlike a public domain declaration – where the author (at least can be said to) gives up the copyright – with a CC-BY licence the copyright holder retains the copyright but grants the user a licence to use it under wide terms. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 16:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * Thanks for the quick response. Emboldened, I went ahead and uploaded it, aided by the estimable Upload Wizard. When I was all done -- every i dotted and t crossed -- I found out that someone had already uploaded it, except with better descriptive info etc. Are you empowered to delete the redundant copy I uploaded i.e. ? Thanks, and sorry for the bother. * EEng (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * P.S. Here's what confused me: When searching to see if the image was already available, I somehow arrived at this thing, a "page" on Commons, which doesn't show it; thought later I discovered that this thing, a "category" on commons does show it. I am admittedly Commons-naïve (though fairly Pedia-savvy) yet this page-category distinction seems to me oversubtle. Any words of wisdom? * As to the duplicate, it's not something I can do but another visitor to this page might. Else check the criteria for speedy deletion, since you might have some luck there. The page/category thing can sometimes be useful, although it can also be confusing as you;ve decribed. Media can be properly organised on a page, whereas categories can be much broader, nested (with subcategories and things). Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * Afaik, pages at Commons work like representative galleries for assorted content from a larger category. De728631 (talk) 21:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * The commons category page commons:Category:Phineas Gage shows all the images that are tagged with the category while the one you found must have images added by manually. I will tag the duplicate as such. ww2censor (talk) 22:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks, everyone. I guess my point is that it's a trap for the unwary to have "pages" and "categories" with indistinguishable names, so that I (for example) -- not realizing there's even a difference -- thought I was seeing everything "Gage" when in fact I was only seeing someone's selected subset. EEng (talk) Neurobiology image I need a bit of input from some knowledgable copyright folks on this one... One of the WEP students on Marquette Uni's Neurobiology course has located a couple of brain scans which she wishes to use in an article about Aicardi–Goutières syndrome (currently a sandbox draft). The scans are located online here, at Science Direct, and appear to be copyrighted by Elsevier, so at first glance, we can't use them here. However, it seems to me that a case could be made for fair use of these images. There's unlikely to be a free equivalent - this is a very rare brain disorder, and unless some of our editors have access to an Aicardi–Goutières patient and an MRI scanner (in which case, message me!) I can't see a free version being made available. It/they would only be used in a single article (the scans are pretty much irrelevent elesewhere), and would enhance a reader's understanding of the subject. I won't go through the rest of the FU requirements here, but suffice to say I think the images would meet them. That said, image copyright isn't my specialist subject; I'd appreciate some advice from those of you for whom it is. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水 07:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * I suspect that a diagram may be able to replace this sort of image. So therefore not satisfying our criteria. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:55, 19 March 2013 (UTC) * That idea hadn't actually occurred to me, thanks Graeme. I've advised the student accordingly; hopefully they'll be willing to create such a diagram and upload it. Cheers, Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水 11:00, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * To avoid the new diagram being a derivative work, ensure the student doesn't use an automated process to create the diagram (this is a good rule of thumb, anyway: when you do it yourself, you think a lot more critically and originally about what is shown, how it is shown, and so on). This would almost certainly mean a better diagram if done properly as well. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 11:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC) File:Miss Independent music video.png File:Miss Independent music video.png – The image is a low resolution screenshot of the accompanying music video of "Miss Independent", and I've added a little bit more explanation in the purpose text the reason for including it there. It is a also not a random scene, identification and critical commentary on the music video section of the article. So should it be deleted? Chihciboy (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Kantragada Kantragada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anilrajkaddala (talk • contribs) 16:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * Is there a media copyright question to do with the article Kantragada? ww2censor (talk) 20:29, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Conflict on source page on license - what takes priority? A user uploaded File:Harlem Shake meme B-Town ASU.jpg under a PD license, which are screengrabs from a YouTube video. The video is clearly self-created (but not likely by the editor that uploaded the image) so its not a question of original copyright On the video's page, the uploaded states in the description that the video is in the public domain, but the licensing is the default YT license, which presumes copyright to the video's owner. Clearly there's a conflict between these two. Short of contacting the video owner to get them to correct the conflict, what should be done in a case like this? If the video owner suggests PD that would seem to override the more restrictive YT license, and thus making the screengrabs free, but there's the possibility that the more restrictive YT license overrides that (since it's formalized out). --M ASEM (t) 17:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * I know the video uploader and can ask him to modify the YouTube license to reflect the public domain status of the video. The only conflict I can think of (I'm not super familiar with YouTube) is if YouTube won't allow the free license due to the use of a copyrighted song. Nevertheless, the actual video content—if not, maybe, the full video with audio as it would appear on YouTube—was released into the public domain by the copyright holder. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * Yeah, that's a good point about the music. We know what the intent seemed to be. Maybe at worst we do something like WP:CONSENT to say that your two screengrabs can be licensed PD, removing the music issue and the YT license from the equation. --M ASEM (t) 17:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * That works for me (and the copyright holder)—where should we submit a PD consent message? I'm not really familiar with the process. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * Just ask him (not you) to send an email to the ORTS with the message described, all as listed out in WP:CONSENT. (it's a template message, just need to entire the right things. I know it doesn't include a Public Domain license, but I would believe that if he starts that the video-only portions of his video are public domain, that should be sufficient.) ORTS will eventually (it takes time) review and tag the image, but given good faith, I don't see anything else that we need to do with the image after that so it should be fine as it as a free image. --M ASEM (t) 18:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * OK great, thanks. To check the exact wording of releasing into the public domain (since that is a little irregular as you said), the text of the email should include: * I, xxxxxxxx, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the "ASU B-Town Harlem Shake (OFFICIAL)" video found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWt0wHBXob4 * I agree to license the video into the public domain. * I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by any other applicable laws. * I am aware that releasing the video into the public domain is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. * I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. ... Correct? --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 18:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * I'd make the "I agree to " line be to license the two screenshots in your image taken from his video to be int he PD (and include the link to that image). That way, there's no attempt to infringe on the song rights or difficulties otherwise; he as the video publisher absolutely controls the images and putting them to PD is his right. But otherwise that's good. --M ASEM (t) 19:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC) * Awesome! Thanks, I really appreciate your assistance in this matter. The email should be sent later today. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Incomplete Copyright Information for File:Valérie_Bemeriki.jpg Hi! I recieved a note on the incomplete information I provided for File:Valérie_Bemeriki.jpg. I've responded, does this answer the mentioned criteria (1 and 10b)? I'll make the mentioned adjustments. Thanks for the patience, this is the first time I've uploaded an image. PZAJ (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Israeli Air Force logos I posted a question at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright that pertains to some files currently listed here at en:WP as non-free logos. Input there is welcome. – JBarta (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Can someone reduce this? I have no idea how to reduce File:Elio Motors Production Shot.jpg, is someone able to do that? Ryan Vesey 17:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * reduced to 0.1MP Werieth (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * I reduced it to a quarter the size, Werieth reduced it further-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 17:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * Wow, that was really fast. Thank you both. Ryan Vesey 17:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC) ✅, Plus I deleted the other two versions.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 17:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * NFC recommends 0.1 megapixel which is what I used. Werieth (talk) 17:51, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * Is there an easy way to do this in the future or do you have special programs? Ryan Vesey 17:52, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * Ryan, I use Photoshop for image editing, but it is overkill just for size reduction. All graphics apps have this ability and I think most recent flavours of Windows (well XP anyway) can reduce image size within Windows Explorer by right-clicking the file name and selecting that option.--ukexpat (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * Furthermore, can someone check and/or reduce my other files? File:Mancur Olson.jpg, File:European Journal of Cancer Care.gif, File:Larry Buhler.jpg, File:Abu-Zaid al Kuwaiti.jpg, and File:Cambria logo.png Ryan Vesey 17:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * I didn't calculate the exact resolution, but all of those files look good. Werieth (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * I have reduced File:Larry Buhler.jpg and File:Abu-Zaid al Kuwaiti.jpg, but the others are ok and don't need any treatment. De728631 (talk) 18:29, 22 March 2013 (UTC) * Reduction is really simple by using our servers themselves. Decide the size that you want and preview a page with the image at that resolution (i.e. if you want 250px, preview the page with Elio Motors Production Shot.jpg ), download and save the image (if in IE, rightclick and select "Save Target As..."), and then upload that one on top of the existing image. Nyttend (talk) 03:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC) US copyright renewal for 2D works of art How did the copyright renewal process work for paintings — was it the same as for printed works? The Detroit Industry Murals were painted in the early 1930s, so they're definitely from the renewal-required time period, and their painter was a foreigner, so it's probably a little more possible that he would have forgotten to renew them. Nyttend (talk) 03:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC) How much copyright research "good enough"? I have purchased an original glossy International News Photo dated 1944 that does not carry a copyright notice. According to the [Library of Congress] information very few of these were copyrighted during that period. Unlike a book or other bound work this photographic image does not have a title. Even the US Copyright Office [Circular 22] states that searches are not always conclusive. My question is how much research must I do to "prove" it is in the public domain? If it was never copyrighted it is very difficult to prove the negative. Any editor could disupte the rationale for PD with a claim that the research wasn't sufficient. Blue Riband► * Basically, what you have described is good faith effort towards asserting the freeness of the photo under known copyright laws. I would recommend that when you upload it that in addition to the normal elements, you simply include your rational you give above, which all seem on the up and up. An editor may dispute the image and may require more leg work but you have provided enough rational here to make a fair initial claim to allow it uploaded as PD. --M ASEM (t) 14:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC) * Thank you for the fast response. I'll incorporate the above information as the PD justification. Blue Riband► 01:19, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Public Available Images Hello, These two images are available publicly for usage; Why is there a deletion tag on them ? please notify me why and how to avoid that happening. Thank you. Best Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrox2 (talk • contribs) * File:Deepika Samson on the sets of Sasural Simar Ka on 1st Aug 2011.jpg ‎ * File:Mukul Harish.jpg * The deletion tags are there because there is no proof that the images are in the public domain. I believe that for each image you wrote "the image is publicly available for sharing and usage from the source and can be found everywhere on the net", however, being available for public to see online in no way indicates that they have been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. The source website don't verify your claim, so you must verify that this is so, otherwise they will be deleted. In fact the Times of India webpage has a copyright notice at the bottom of the page with an "All rights reserved" statement that you appears to have missed or ignored. Unfortunately most images found on the internet are copyright to someone and cannot be used here. You may find it useful to read my image copyright information page. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 17:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Painting of Frederick Ruple I bought this painting at an Estate sale and Frederick Ruple the artist lived from 1871 to 1938. I want to show a different painting he did. He normaly painted portraits and battle scens from the civil war. I bought a postcard and the copy right on the back says: CURTEICHCOLOR 3-D NATURAL COLOR REPRODUCTIONS(REG. U.S. PAT. OFF) The painting is named "Battle of Paris" if you go google images of Frederick Ruple you will see the 3 postcard images I would like to put in the article. Am I allowed to put a copy of the painting that I have in the article? Shall I copyright the painting first so I own the copyright? Am I allowed to put an image of the 3 postcards in the article about Frederick Ruple? --Creative Hansen (talk) 21:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Lithograph I own I own a lithograph of a pretty famous painter. There were 200 in the series. It was produced in the late '60s or early '70s. She's now deceased. If I take a picture of the lithograph I own, can I post that as Creative Commons/PD? Or is the image itself owned by her estate? If it's owned by the estate, and all works by the artist are still copyrighted, can I post it anyway as fair use in her article which has no images? <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC) * Unfortunately ownership of a litho does not confer you with any rights of reproduction unless they were specifically sold to you by the copyright holder. Any photo you take of the lithograph will be a derivative work which requires the artist's, or their heirs, release under a free licence. The litho is normally still in copyright for at least 70 years after her death though it could be as long as 95 years. However, the date of publication is important because it depends on whether the litho was published pre-1963 without renewal of copyright, pre-1978 without any copyright notice or between 1978 and 1978 with neither copyright notice nor registration within 5 years. This Commons page may be of help to you in determining that if you know publication date. Generally a fair use image of the person may be acceptable in their own article as identification in the infobox but for an artist examples of their work may be used so long as the image is used to illustrate critical commentary about their work which requires some reliable source and must comply with all 10 points of our fair-use policy which is stricter than the US legal understanding. ww2censor (talk) 22:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC) * Wow, that's a lot to comply with! Maybe I'll just help the text along. I was thinking it didn't make sense I would be able to release the copyright because then I guess anyone could just take a photograph of anything and then say they own the image. Thank you. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 23:58, 26 March 2013 (UTC) * Some copyright issues can be difficult to understand or determine especially if you don't have all the details. Your litho might be in the public domain but you need more research to decide that. Working on prose will be good too and we always need new constructive editors, so good luck. You may also find it useful to read my image copyright information page if you want more copyright details to ponder on. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Canadian Government copyright on maps Hello all. We've got a discussion going on the Canadian noticeboard about the recent release of a lot of useful cartographic material released under this license. There is some disagreement whether this meets our GFDL/CC requirements. Any expert advice would be appreciated - these maps would be very beneficial to Canadian geography articles. The Interior (Talk) 23:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC) Facebook link Can I give link to Facebook page created by me, it is social, not personalVijayaivalli (talk) 15:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC) * If your page is neutral, contains information about a subject with a Wikipedia article, and doesn't make use of images, texts, etc. that have been published elsewhere, then you could add a link to the "External links" section of the article. Please see also External links for more information. De728631 (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC) * If the OP is asking about adding Facebook links to articles, WP:ELNO would suggest otherwise...--ukexpat (talk) 16:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC) * Yes, Facebook is discouraged "except for a link to an official page of the article's subject". So it would depend on the subject and FB page. De728631 (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Film copyright question Hi, I have a series of a few videos on Youtube. I am a professional photographer and filmmaker. I have shot, produced, edited and published these videos myself with the music and all. I've put in several hours of work on these films. These videos feature the art of an ebru artist. We made a bunch of these one night but recently had a falling out. He re-uploaded these same videos from my channel onto his channel. You can clearly see my name on the copyright and at the end in the credits. Who has the rights to these films? I mean these are MY images and the movies are the fruit of MY labors with the editing and the music and all. What is the situation in a case like this? Here's a link to one of the videos in question, all videos are similar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36EYBCTK1_8 Jpbrunel (talk) 23:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC) JP * We are not a law firm and cannot give personal legal advice. this forum is for internal discussion of content on Wikipedia.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC) * You should probably consult an attorney who specialises in intellectual property. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC) External link copyright issue Per a discussion at Talk:Planet of the Apes (novel) I have a question regarding a link that was removed after nearly three years on the Planet of the Apes (novel) article. We only want to link to the site, not reuse the images on Wikipedia. This is how the EL appeared: La Planète des singes at The Sacred Scrolls - History of the novel's international editions with book cover images. We want to narrow the question here to whether or not WP:ELNEVER prohibits linking to this site in regards to the images. As pointed out on the Talk page, ''it's worth bearing in mind that image use on another site doesn't have to meet our FUR criteria (which is set above the legal criteria), just the legally understood definition. In this case, FU usually applies if the images being used are of sufficiently low resolution, do not hurt the copyright owners commercial prospects nor are used to generate an income. If you can clear using The Sacred Scrolls'' site as an EL concerning copyright issues, we'll take it from there. - Gothicfilm (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC) * I'm not seeing this as a massive copyright violation on the Wikia end, in the sense that it might be over fair use, but it's not wholesale reproductions or the like. Removing the like on the issue that the page enables copyright infringement is not appropriate. (There may be other reasons that WP:ELNO outlines, but I'd clear it of copyright issues). --M ASEM (t) 18:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC) Television screenshots I would like to upload some television screenshots but am having trouble figuring out how to do so. I think these would be helpful in illustrating certain articles:, , ,. Can comply with the copyright criteria? --1ST7 (talk) 20:48, 29 March 2013 (UTC) * Screenshots are subject to the same copyright status of the work they are from. So they are only public domain if the film, tv series etc they are taken from is also in the public domain or has been released under some sort of free licence. As a recent TV show it is unlikely that NCIS has been released under a free licence and is definitely not in the public domain due to age, so the screenshots are not released either. Screenshots ineligible for a free licence can be uploaded if, and only if, they comply with all the criteria of the the Non-free content criteria. The one you would really need to address would be #8 and that presence of an image would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. NtheP (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC) * To add to "NtheP's" comments about copyright images, any such non-free image MUST comply with all 10 non-free content criteria not just #8. ww2censor (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC) * Thanks for the help. I think the images can comply with the criteria. Most of the articles I am hoping to add an image to currently do not have one, and I think they would increase readers' understanding of the subject. --1ST7 (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2013 (UTC) copyright Is the name "Voyeur" for a band name copyrighted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC) * In the U.S., neither a band's name nor a short phrase as such would be under copyright. However, they might be trademarked or protected as service marks and it is probably far too much work for anyone with Wikipedia to research whether a particular trademark or service mark exists. And it is common for bands not to trademark their names and yet their names are protected under the law against unfair competition. Your best options are probably to research (through search engines, music literature and websites, catalogues, and so on) the possibility of existence and, if you're more concerned, to ask a lawyer (or do your own legal research) for how to protect the name. Nick Levinson (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC) (Corrected my misspelling: 18:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)) Movie Poster submission for the film CORKY 1972 What do I have to do to upload this image file to Wikipedia? I followed the steps however I was told not to upload it if I had no real Copyright claim to it. I can't see why MGM would object to it since they allow most all main stream film's images to be uploaded. I have the image on file in my pictures but this is where it came from: Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by KentuckyBootleg (talk • contribs) 17:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC) * I've uploaded the image as File:Corky 1972 movie poster.jpg and added the appropriate non-free rationale and licence for such a poster and put it in the infobox of Corky (film). The poster is likely still in copyright but without proof the copyright has expired we have to assume it is still copyright, so requires the format I added which you, as an inexperienced editor, will not be familiar with. There is some text at the bottom of the poster which may be a copyright notice but it is unreadable. You may find it useful to read my image copyright information page. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC) New User If anyone has words of advice or encouragement to this good faith new user,User talk:Prairie dog yeah who appears to have a bit of a copyvio issue on an image they have some kind of permission to use. Please help and comment on their user page. Thanks.Alanscottwalker (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC) * You may find it useful to point him to my image copyright information page that I wrote in an attempt to cover most copyright issues many inexperienced editors may have or come across, with lots of explanations. ww2censor (talk) 20:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)	WIKI
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/COIReports/2007, Jun 28 * 23:48:37, Wed Jun 27, 2007 - user:Leben1189 (contribs; 3/6) scores 55.55% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 27.7%) on calculated overlap Leben1189 <-> Chris Leben (Chris Leben - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:49:51, Wed Jun 27, 2007 - user:Leben1189 (contribs; 4/7) scores 55.55% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 27.7%) on calculated overlap Leben1189 <-> Chris Leben (Chris Leben - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:50:16, Wed Jun 27, 2007 - user:GarfieldPetForce (contribs; 1/27) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap GarfieldPetForce <-> Pet Force (Pet Force - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:50:51, Wed Jun 27, 2007 - user:GarfieldPetForce (contribs; 2/28) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap GarfieldPetForce <-> Pet Force (Pet Force - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:54:50, Wed Jun 27, 2007 - user:Hockeynightli (contribs; 1/1) scores 97.07% (U->P) & 55.65% (P->U) (ratio: 54%) on calculated overlap Hockeynightli <-> Hockey Night on Long Island (Hockey Night on Long Island - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:02:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Katatoniclay1113 (contribs; 1/1) scores 60.35% (U->P) & 68.97% (P->U) (ratio: 41.6%) on calculated overlap Katatoniclay1113 <-> Katatonic State (Katatonic State - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:03:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:El C (contribs; 1/20) scores 87% (U->P) & 37.5% (P->U) (ratio: 32.6%) on calculated overlap El C <-> Electron (Electron - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:07:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Katatoniclay1113 (contribs; 2/2) scores 60.35% (U->P) & 68.97% (P->U) (ratio: 41.6%) on calculated overlap Katatoniclay1113 <-> Katatonic State (Katatonic State - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:21:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Angelomercure (contribs; 1/9) scores 81% (U->P) & 68.42% (P->U) (ratio: 55.4%) on calculated overlap Angelomercure <-> Angelo Victor Mercure (Angelo Victor Mercure - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:24:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Guitarchat (contribs; 1/1) scores 68.1% (U->P) & 75.66% (P->U) (ratio: 51.5%) on calculated overlap Guitarchat <-> Guitarist (Guitarist - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:26:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chaoco (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Chaoco <-> Chaoco (Chaoco - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:32:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Andrewgray5 (contribs; 1/1) scores 87.27% (U->P) & 87.27% (P->U) (ratio: 76.1%) on calculated overlap Andrewgray5 <-> Andrew r. gray (Andrew r. gray - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:33:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boostmobile (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 37.93% (P->U) (ratio: 37.9%) on calculated overlap Boostmobile <-> Boost Mobile Pro of Skateboarding (Boost Mobile Pro of Skateboarding - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:34:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Guitarchat (contribs; 2/2) scores 54% (U->P) & 53.27% (P->U) (ratio: 28.7%) on calculated overlap Guitarchat <-> Electric guitar (Electric guitar - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:36:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:321qwerty123 (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap 321qwerty123 <-> QWERTY (QWERTY - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:39:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aeallen (contribs; 1/1) scores 84.28% (U->P) & 73.75% (P->U) (ratio: 62.1%) on calculated overlap Aeallen <-> Amy Allen (Amy Allen - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:40:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ColWilliam (contribs; 1/19) scores 78.09% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 45.5%) on calculated overlap ColWilliam <-> William Stacy (William Stacy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:41:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Indon (contribs; 1/61) scores 72% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Indon <-> Paul London (Paul London - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:42:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ColWilliam (contribs; 2/20) scores 78.09% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 45.5%) on calculated overlap ColWilliam <-> William Stacy (William Stacy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:42:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ali roadogg (contribs; 1/1) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap Ali roadogg <-> Roadogg (Roadogg - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:43:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ali roadogg (contribs; 2/2) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap Ali roadogg <-> Roadogg (Roadogg - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:47:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nickduong (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nickduong <-> Nick Duong (Nick Duong - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:48:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aeallen (contribs; 2/2) scores 84.28% (U->P) & 73.75% (P->U) (ratio: 62.1%) on calculated overlap Aeallen <-> Amy Allen (Amy Allen - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:48:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Miniartists (contribs; 1/2) scores 52.83% (U->P) & 59.28% (P->U) (ratio: 31.3%) on calculated overlap Miniartists <-> Miniature art (Miniature art - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:48:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Bride Band (contribs; 1/14) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The Bride Band <-> The Bride (band) (The Bride (band) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:49:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boostmobile (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Boostmobile <-> Boost Mobile (Boost Mobile - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:49:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ColWilliam (contribs; 3/21) scores 78.09% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 45.5%) on calculated overlap ColWilliam <-> William Stacy (William Stacy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:50:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 1/108) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:53:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thebigboi (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Thebigboi <-> Thebigboi (Thebigboi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:53:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thebigboi (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Thebigboi <-> Thebigboi (Thebigboi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:53:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thebigboi (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Thebigboi <-> Thebigboi (Thebigboi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:53:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boostmobile (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Boostmobile <-> Boost Mobile (Boost Mobile - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:54:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nickduong (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nickduong <-> Nick Duong (Nick Duong - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:54:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nickduong (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nickduong <-> Nick Duong (Nick Duong - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:54:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boostmobile (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Boostmobile <-> Boost Mobile (Boost Mobile - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:55:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boostmobile (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Boostmobile <-> Boost Mobile (Boost Mobile - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:55:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Miniartists (contribs; 2/3) scores 52.83% (U->P) & 59.28% (P->U) (ratio: 31.3%) on calculated overlap Miniartists <-> Miniature art (Miniature art - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 00:58:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Bride Band (contribs; 2/15) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The Bride Band <-> The Bride (band) (The Bride (band) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:00:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Eliran Son (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 86.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.7%) on calculated overlap Eliran Son <-> Ron Eliran (Ron Eliran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:05:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 1/13) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:06:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 2/14) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:08:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Bride Band (contribs; 3/16) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The Bride Band <-> The Bride (band) (The Bride (band) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:11:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Bride Band (contribs; 4/17) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The Bride Band <-> The Bride (band) (The Bride (band) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:12:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boostmobile (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 55% (P->U) (ratio: 55%) on calculated overlap Boostmobile <-> Boost Mobile Pro of Surf (Boost Mobile Pro of Surf - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:12:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Bride Band (contribs; 5/18) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The Bride Band <-> The Bride (band) (The Bride (band) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:13:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Bride Band (contribs; 6/19) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The Bride Band <-> The Bride (band) (The Bride (band) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:14:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jtalledo (contribs; 1/2) scores 47.62% (U->P) & 57.15% (P->U) (ratio: 27.2%) on calculated overlap Jtalledo <-> Al Lowe (Al Lowe - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:15:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Markeer (contribs; 1/1) scores 51.42% (U->P) & 51.42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.4%) on calculated overlap Markeer <-> Sara Lee (Sara Lee - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:29:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Geologyguy (contribs; 1/50) scores 70% (U->P) & 63.63% (P->U) (ratio: 44.5%) on calculated overlap Geologyguy <-> Rock (geology) (Rock (geology) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:30:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Savokescape (contribs; 1/3) scores 59.91% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 27.6%) on calculated overlap Savokescape <-> Escape the room (Escape the room - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:37:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kdchant (contribs; 1/3) scores 84.28% (U->P) & 73.75% (P->U) (ratio: 62.1%) on calculated overlap Kdchant <-> Ken Chant (Ken Chant - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:39:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chaldean (contribs; 1/16) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Chaldean <-> Chaldean (Chaldean - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:42:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 3/15) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:44:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gpholmes (contribs; 1/1) scores 75% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Gpholmes <-> Holmes (Holmes - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:47:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Emanuelxavier (contribs; 1/16) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Emanuelxavier <-> Emanuel Xavier (Emanuel Xavier - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:48:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 4/16) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat Manor (Meerkat Manor - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:49:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 5/17) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat Manor (Meerkat Manor - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:53:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GlenMo2121 (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 30%) on calculated overlap GlenMo2121 <-> Glenmoor Boyz (Glenmoor Boyz - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 01:58:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Theatreboy22 (contribs; 1/4) scores 58.33% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 31.4%) on calculated overlap Theatreboy22 <-> Aussie theatre (Aussie theatre - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:09:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jeffwishart (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 78.57% (P->U) (ratio: 78.5%) on calculated overlap Jeffwishart <-> Jeffrey wishart (Jeffrey wishart - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:12:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jeffwishart (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 78.57% (P->U) (ratio: 78.5%) on calculated overlap Jeffwishart <-> Jeffrey wishart (Jeffrey wishart - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:14:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jeffwishart (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 78.57% (P->U) (ratio: 78.5%) on calculated overlap Jeffwishart <-> Jeffrey Wishart (Jeffrey Wishart - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:16:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DisneyParksFan (contribs; 1/1) scores 47.54% (U->P) & 53.92% (P->U) (ratio: 25.6%) on calculated overlap DisneyParksFan <-> Disney Store (Disney Store - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:17:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 4/18) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:19:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Godzilla Boy (contribs; 1/40) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Godzilla Boy <-> Godzilla (Godzilla - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:20:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hongooi (contribs; 1/16) scores 54.28% (U->P) & 52.2% (P->U) (ratio: 28.3%) on calculated overlap Hongooi <-> Gothi (Gothi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:20:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Godzilla Boy (contribs; 2/41) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Godzilla Boy <-> Godzilla (Godzilla - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:22:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Godzilla Boy (contribs; 3/42) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Godzilla Boy <-> Godzilla (Godzilla - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:22:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Godzilla Boy (contribs; 4/43) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Godzilla Boy <-> Godzilla (Godzilla - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:25:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Godzilla Boy (contribs; 5/44) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Godzilla Boy <-> Zilla (Zilla - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:26:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Godzilla Boy (contribs; 6/45) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Godzilla Boy <-> Zilla (Zilla - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:28:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Makkiwhip (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap Makkiwhip <-> Makkiwhipdies (Makkiwhipdies - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:32:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Makkiwhip (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap Makkiwhip <-> Makkiwhipdies (Makkiwhipdies - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:33:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Makkiwhip (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap Makkiwhip <-> Makkiwhipdies (Makkiwhipdies - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:34:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Sterling healey (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Sterling healey <-> Sterling healey (Sterling healey - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:47:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lifter puller (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Lifter puller <-> Lifter Puller (Lifter Puller - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:54:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hirenism (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Hirenism <-> Hirenism (Hirenism - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 02:57:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hirenism (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Hirenism <-> Hirenism (Hirenism - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:04:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hirenism (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Hirenism <-> Hirenism (Hirenism - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:08:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 1/109) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:08:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jeepday (contribs; 1/2) scores 41.42% (U->P) & 65.25% (P->U) (ratio: 27%) on calculated overlap Jeepday <-> Jebe (Jebe - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:09:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Colleenmarykelly (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Colleenmarykelly <-> Colleen Mary Kelly (Colleen Mary Kelly - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:11:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Colleenmarykelly (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Colleenmarykelly <-> Colleen Mary Kelly (Colleen Mary Kelly - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:11:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 2/110) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:13:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Colleenmarykelly (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Colleenmarykelly <-> Colleen Mary Kelly (Colleen Mary Kelly - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:18:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Midnightrunforyourlife (contribs; 1/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Midnightrunforyourlife <-> Midnight Run for Your Life (Midnight Run for Your Life - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:34:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cacycle (contribs; 1/2) scores 62.99% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 28.6%) on calculated overlap Cacycle <-> Doxycycline (Doxycycline - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:34:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Iowahwyman (contribs; 1/4) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Iowahwyman <-> Iowa (Iowa - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:35:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cacycle (contribs; 2/3) scores 62.99% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 28.6%) on calculated overlap Cacycle <-> Doxycycline (Doxycycline - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:36:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 3/111) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:40:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Drindianajones (contribs; 1/1) scores 69.42% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 27.7%) on calculated overlap Drindianajones <-> Anna Jones (Indiana Jones character) (Anna Jones (Indiana Jones character) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:42:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Busterandbillie (contribs; 1/25) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Busterandbillie <-> Buster and Billie (Buster and Billie - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:42:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Coloradan (contribs; 1/60) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 41.8%) on calculated overlap Coloradan <-> Colorado Chill (Colorado Chill - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:42:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Busterandbillie (contribs; 2/26) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Busterandbillie <-> Buster and Billie (Buster and Billie - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:42:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Busterandbillie (contribs; 3/27) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Busterandbillie <-> Buster and Billie (Buster and Billie - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:43:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 4/112) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:49:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fire Star (contribs; 1/3) scores 59.11% (U->P) & 59.11% (P->U) (ratio: 34.9%) on calculated overlap Fire Star <-> Firework (Firework - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:49:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Coloradan (contribs; 2/61) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 41.8%) on calculated overlap Coloradan <-> Colorado Chill (Colorado Chill - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:49:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Pleaoner (contribs; 1/1) scores 47.62% (U->P) & 57.15% (P->U) (ratio: 27.2%) on calculated overlap Pleaoner <-> Artone (Artone - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:51:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:EarthPerson (contribs; 1/1) scores 51% (U->P) & 64.8% (P->U) (ratio: 33%) on calculated overlap EarthPerson <-> Artone (Artone - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:57:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lordrobin3k (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Lordrobin3k <-> Lord Robin3K (Lord Robin3K - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 03:59:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ccsheffield (contribs; 1/16) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ccsheffield <-> C.C. Sheffield (C.C. Sheffield - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:00:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ccsheffield (contribs; 2/17) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ccsheffield <-> C.C. Sheffield (C.C. Sheffield - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:02:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Spigit (contribs; 1/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Spigit <-> Spigit (Spigit - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:04:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Sibiryak (contribs; 1/1) scores 57.75% (U->P) & 59.4% (P->U) (ratio: 34.3%) on calculated overlap Sibiryak <-> Siberia (Siberia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:05:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lila Guzman (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Lila Guzman <-> Guzman (Guzman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:13:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Trusilver (contribs; 1/7) scores 75.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 41.2%) on calculated overlap Trusilver <-> Silverchair (Silverchair - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:25:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Doug transracial fam milw (contribs; 1/1) scores 27.27% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 27.2%) on calculated overlap Doug transracial fam milw <-> Transr (Transr - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:28:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG <-> LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG (LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:29:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Doug transracial fam milw (contribs; 2/2) scores 58.23% (U->P) & 47.33% (P->U) (ratio: 27.5%) on calculated overlap Doug transracial fam milw <-> Transracial Families - Resource Guide (Transracial Families - Resource Guide - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:32:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ragaazmusic (contribs; 1/1) scores 54.54% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 54.5%) on calculated overlap Ragaazmusic <-> Ragaaz (Ragaaz - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:35:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Xotheusedguyox (contribs; 1/266) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Xotheusedguyox <-> The Used (The Used - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:36:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Xotheusedguyox (contribs; 2/267) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Xotheusedguyox <-> The Used (The Used - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:39:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ratangarh (contribs; 1/15) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.25% (P->U) (ratio: 56.2%) on calculated overlap Ratangarh <-> Ratangarh, Bijnor (Ratangarh, Bijnor - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:56:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Contestcen (contribs; 1/5) scores 70% (U->P) & 60.07% (P->U) (ratio: 42%) on calculated overlap Contestcen <-> Puzzle contest (Puzzle contest - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:57:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG <-> LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG (LASERDOGTHEBIGDOG - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:57:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Coralys (contribs; 1/1) scores 42.85% (U->P) & 75% (P->U) (ratio: 32.1%) on calculated overlap Coralys <-> Dora (Dora - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:59:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:OverlordQ (contribs; 1/2) scores 52.54% (U->P) & 52.54% (P->U) (ratio: 27.6%) on calculated overlap OverlordQ <-> Time lords (Time lords - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 04:59:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Magnetodoc (contribs; 1/1) scores 69.56% (U->P) & 45.94% (P->U) (ratio: 31.9%) on calculated overlap Magnetodoc <-> Magneto (electrical) (Magneto (electrical) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:06:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Raleman (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 53.8%) on calculated overlap Raleman <-> Ricardo Aleman (Ricardo Aleman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:15:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Xotheusedguyox (contribs; 3/268) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Xotheusedguyox <-> The Used (The Used - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:20:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thomas ramapuram (contribs; 1/1) scores 63.93% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 38.3%) on calculated overlap Thomas ramapuram <-> Ramapuram family (Ramapuram family - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:21:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thomas ramapuram (contribs; 2/2) scores 63.93% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 38.3%) on calculated overlap Thomas ramapuram <-> Ramapuram family (Ramapuram family - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:23:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thomas ramapuram (contribs; 3/3) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Thomas ramapuram <-> Ramapuram (Ramapuram - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:24:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DonVerbal (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap DonVerbal <-> DonVerbal (DonVerbal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:26:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DonVerbal (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap DonVerbal <-> DonVerbal (DonVerbal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:27:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DonVerbal (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap DonVerbal <-> DonVerbal (DonVerbal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:33:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kalariyaamit (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Kalariyaamit <-> Kalariyaamit (Kalariyaamit - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:33:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Shikai shaw (contribs; 1/1) scores 50.49% (U->P) & 57.71% (P->U) (ratio: 29.1%) on calculated overlap Shikai shaw <-> Ashihara (Ashihara - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:39:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Porschaporsche (contribs; 1/8) scores 57.59% (U->P) & 57.59% (P->U) (ratio: 33.1%) on calculated overlap Porschaporsche <-> Porscha Coleman (Porscha Coleman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:39:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Porschaporsche (contribs; 2/9) scores 57.59% (U->P) & 57.59% (P->U) (ratio: 33.1%) on calculated overlap Porschaporsche <-> Porscha Coleman (Porscha Coleman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:41:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kalariyaamit (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Kalariyaamit <-> Kalariyaamit (Kalariyaamit - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:43:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kalariyaamit (contribs; 3/3) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Kalariyaamit <-> Amit Kalariya (Amit Kalariya - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:43:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Davidadavidson (contribs; 1/1) scores 92.85% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 92.8%) on calculated overlap Davidadavidson <-> David Davidson (David Davidson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 05:57:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smallela (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.53% (P->U) (ratio: 61.5%) on calculated overlap Smallela <-> Suresh Mallela (Suresh Mallela - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:02:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:CandiceLover123 (contribs; 1/9) scores 50.2% (U->P) & 50.2% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap CandiceLover123 <-> Candice Michelle (Candice Michelle - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:03:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:CandiceLover123 (contribs; 2/10) scores 50.2% (U->P) & 50.2% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap CandiceLover123 <-> Candice Michelle (Candice Michelle - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:08:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Shaktipravesh (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Shaktipravesh <-> Shakti Pravesh (Shakti Pravesh - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:10:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tampabay721 (contribs; 1/11) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 47.05% (P->U) (ratio: 34.2%) on calculated overlap Tampabay721 <-> Tampa Bay Devil Rays (Tampa Bay Devil Rays - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:14:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:RockWeapons (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 78.57% (P->U) (ratio: 78.5%) on calculated overlap RockWeapons <-> The Rock Weapons (The Rock Weapons - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:15:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Xotheusedguyox (contribs; 1/269) scores 54.68% (U->P) & 63.25% (P->U) (ratio: 34.5%) on calculated overlap Xotheusedguyox <-> The Used (album) (The Used (album) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:15:57, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 1/83) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:16:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 2/84) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:16:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Xotheusedguyox (contribs; 2/270) scores 54.68% (U->P) & 63.25% (P->U) (ratio: 34.5%) on calculated overlap Xotheusedguyox <-> The Used (album) (The Used (album) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:16:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 3/85) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:16:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 4/86) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:17:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 5/87) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:19:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Evandebest (contribs; 1/1) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Evandebest <-> Evan (Evan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:19:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 6/88) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:20:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smallela (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.53% (P->U) (ratio: 61.5%) on calculated overlap Smallela <-> Suresh Mallela (Suresh Mallela - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:21:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Evandebest (contribs; 2/2) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Evandebest <-> Evan (Evan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:21:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 7/89) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:21:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 8/90) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:21:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 9/91) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:21:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 10/92) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:22:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Evandebest (contribs; 3/3) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Evandebest <-> Evan (Evan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:24:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Evandebest (contribs; 4/4) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Evandebest <-> Evan (Evan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:24:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 11/93) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:25:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 12/94) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:26:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 13/95) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:26:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 14/96) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:27:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 15/97) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:28:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 16/98) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:28:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 17/99) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:29:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smallela (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.53% (P->U) (ratio: 61.5%) on calculated overlap Smallela <-> Suresh Mallela (Suresh Mallela - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:31:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 18/100) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:31:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 19/101) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:33:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 20/102) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:33:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 21/103) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:34:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 22/104) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:35:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 23/105) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:37:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 24/106) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:37:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 25/107) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:38:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 26/108) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:38:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 27/109) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:39:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 28/110) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:39:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 29/111) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:40:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 30/112) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:41:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 31/113) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:41:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 32/114) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:50:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Heykyu (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Heykyu <-> Heykyu (Heykyu - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:52:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Maplink (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Maplink <-> Map Link (Map Link - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:52:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Maplink (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Maplink <-> Map Link (Map Link - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:55:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Maplink (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Maplink <-> Map Link (Map Link - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:56:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Amritanshuu (contribs; 1/1) scores 90.9% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 90.9%) on calculated overlap Amritanshuu <-> Amritanshu (Amritanshu - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:58:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Maplink (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Maplink <-> Map Link (Map Link - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:59:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 33/115) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:59:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 1/12) scores 100% (U->P) & 42.85% (P->U) (ratio: 42.8%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> COMINT metadata (COMINT metadata - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 06:59:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 34/116) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:01:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 35/117) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:01:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 36/118) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:02:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 2/13) scores 100% (U->P) & 42.85% (P->U) (ratio: 42.8%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> COMINT metadata (COMINT metadata - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:06:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Maplink (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Maplink <-> Map Link (Map Link - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:08:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hannah Banana jr. (contribs; 1/1) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 85.7%) on calculated overlap Hannah Banana jr. <-> Hannah banana (Hannah banana - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:10:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dfcorcoran (contribs; 1/2) scores 89% (U->P) & 68.46% (P->U) (ratio: 60.9%) on calculated overlap Dfcorcoran <-> David Corcoran (David Corcoran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:10:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hannah Banana jr. (contribs; 2/2) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 85.7%) on calculated overlap Hannah Banana jr. <-> Hannah banana (Hannah banana - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:16:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 1/6) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:16:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 2/7) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:20:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 3/8) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo (Valimo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:23:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Polama (contribs; 1/1) scores 64.93% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 29.9%) on calculated overlap Polama <-> Amapola jarcha (Amapola jarcha - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:23:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 4/9) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo (Valimo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:26:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 3/14) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:27:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Brianga (contribs; 1/4) scores 48.85% (U->P) & 57% (P->U) (ratio: 27.8%) on calculated overlap Brianga <-> Brodin (Brodin - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:28:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Polama (contribs; 2/2) scores 64.93% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 29.9%) on calculated overlap Polama <-> Amapola jarcha (Amapola jarcha - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:28:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 4/15) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:29:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tranbo (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 49% (P->U) (ratio: 29.4%) on calculated overlap Tranbo <-> Thomas Tran (Thomas Tran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:31:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jaegun (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Jaegun <-> Jaegun ahn (Jaegun ahn - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:33:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Juttonn (contribs; 1/2) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 35.7%) on calculated overlap Juttonn <-> The Duttons (The Duttons - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:33:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tranbo (contribs; 2/2) scores 60% (U->P) & 49% (P->U) (ratio: 29.4%) on calculated overlap Tranbo <-> Thomas Tran (Thomas Tran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:34:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kevin Aguilar (contribs; 1/1) scores 90% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 59.9%) on calculated overlap Kevin Aguilar <-> Kevin the man aguilar (Kevin the man aguilar - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:36:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thareendra (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Thareendra <-> Thareendra (Thareendra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:36:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DrKiernan (contribs; 1/3) scores 87.77% (U->P) & 56.42% (P->U) (ratio: 49.5%) on calculated overlap DrKiernan <-> Francis Kiernan (Francis Kiernan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:41:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tranbo (contribs; 3/3) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap Tranbo <-> Alex Tran (Alex Tran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:43:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tranbo (contribs; 4/4) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap Tranbo <-> Alex Tran (Alex Tran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:46:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Velocityxtreme (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Velocityxtreme <-> Velocityxtreme (Velocityxtreme - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:57:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 5/16) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 07:59:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Vixherrera (contribs; 1/3) scores 64.15% (U->P) & 44% (P->U) (ratio: 28.2%) on calculated overlap Vixherrera <-> Victor esteban herrera (Victor esteban herrera - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:03:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 4/17) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:13:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 5/18) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:15:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Zamfiop (contribs; 1/1) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap Zamfiop <-> Zamfi (Zamfi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:20:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:CathBellFan (contribs; 1/1) scores 58.9% (U->P) & 60.43% (P->U) (ratio: 35.5%) on calculated overlap CathBellFan <-> Catherine Bell (Catherine Bell - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:20:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ccsheffield (contribs; 1/18) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ccsheffield <-> C.C. Sheffield (C.C. Sheffield - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:22:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 6/19) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:27:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 6/20) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:40:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:AmitJulka (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap AmitJulka <-> Amit Julka (Amit Julka - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:41:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:AmitJulka (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap AmitJulka <-> Amit Julka (Amit Julka - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:42:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kinnick Teacher (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->P) & 69.6% (P->U) (ratio: 34.7%) on calculated overlap Kinnick Teacher <-> Nile Kinnick (Nile Kinnick - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:44:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kinnick Teacher (contribs; 2/2) scores 50% (U->P) & 69.6% (P->U) (ratio: 34.7%) on calculated overlap Kinnick Teacher <-> Nile Kinnick (Nile Kinnick - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:51:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Laura350 (contribs; 1/1) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 31.2%) on calculated overlap Laura350 <-> Laura walsh (Laura walsh - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:58:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berig (contribs; 1/35) scores 52.2% (U->P) & 48.33% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap Berig <-> Estrid (Estrid - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 08:58:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Savokescape (contribs; 1/4) scores 59.91% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 27.6%) on calculated overlap Savokescape <-> Escape the room (Escape the room - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:01:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 5/21) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> Gencom suite (Gencom suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:01:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berig (contribs; 2/36) scores 52.2% (U->P) & 48.33% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap Berig <-> Estrid (Estrid - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:02:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 6/22) scores 50% (U->P) & 63.5% (P->U) (ratio: 31.7%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> Gencom (Gencom - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:03:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 7/23) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM suite (GenCOM suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:04:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 7/24) scores 50% (U->P) & 63.5% (P->U) (ratio: 31.7%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM (GenCOM - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:04:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Surozzaman (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 83.33% (P->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Surozzaman <-> Md. Surozzaman (Md. Surozzaman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:04:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nittcon (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nittcon <-> Nittcon (Nittcon - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:04:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 8/25) scores 50% (U->P) & 63.5% (P->U) (ratio: 31.7%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GENCOM (GENCOM - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:07:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fishandonions (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Fishandonions <-> Fishandonions (Fishandonions - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:08:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gomaith123 (contribs; 1/1) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap Gomaith123 <-> Gomaith (Gomaith - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:10:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fishandonions (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Fishandonions <-> Fishandonions (Fishandonions - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:13:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Charles Matthews (contribs; 1/29) scores 46.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 46.6%) on calculated overlap Charles Matthews <-> Charles (Charles - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:13:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:PassingStranger (contribs; 1/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 93.75% (P->U) (ratio: 93.7%) on calculated overlap PassingStranger <-> Passing Strangers (Passing Strangers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:20:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ccsheffield (contribs; 2/19) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ccsheffield <-> C.C. Sheffield (C.C. Sheffield - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:20:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gomaith123 (contribs; 2/2) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap Gomaith123 <-> Gomaith (Gomaith - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:22:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rex Germanus (contribs; 1/36) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 63.6%) on calculated overlap Rex Germanus <-> Germans (Germans - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:24:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:R3za-remiX (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap R3za-remiX <-> R3za-remiX (R3za-remiX - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:25:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Comint (contribs; 7/26) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.1%) on calculated overlap Comint <-> GenCOM Suite (GenCOM Suite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:29:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Raja Hussain (contribs; 1/1) scores 43.72% (U->P) & 64.93% (P->U) (ratio: 28.3%) on calculated overlap Raja Hussain <-> Russia (Russia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:32:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joseph Solis in Australia (contribs; 1/24) scores 54.34% (U->P) & 62.92% (P->U) (ratio: 34.1%) on calculated overlap Joseph Solis in Australia <-> Monarchy in Australia (Monarchy in Australia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:34:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berig (contribs; 3/37) scores 52.2% (U->P) & 48.33% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap Berig <-> Estrid (Estrid - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:34:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshua Bronaugh (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Joshua Bronaugh <-> Joshua bronaugh (Joshua bronaugh - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:35:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joseph Solis in Australia (contribs; 2/25) scores 57% (U->P) & 66% (P->U) (ratio: 37.6%) on calculated overlap Joseph Solis in Australia <-> Religion in Australia (Religion in Australia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:36:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshua Bronaugh (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Joshua Bronaugh <-> Joshua bronaugh (Joshua bronaugh - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:38:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MikeHindert (contribs; 1/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap MikeHindert <-> Mike Hindert (Mike Hindert - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:38:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MikeHindert (contribs; 2/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap MikeHindert <-> Mike Hindert (Mike Hindert - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:44:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gowrisreeram (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Gowrisreeram <-> Gowrisreeram (Gowrisreeram - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:46:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshlizard (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Joshlizard <-> Lizard (Lizard - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:46:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gowrisreeram (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Gowrisreeram <-> Gowrisreeram (Gowrisreeram - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:47:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ProgressiveAeternus (contribs; 1/14) scores 57.89% (U->P) & 84.35% (P->U) (ratio: 48.8%) on calculated overlap ProgressiveAeternus <-> Neo progressive (Neo progressive - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:47:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ProgressiveAeternus (contribs; 2/15) scores 57.89% (U->P) & 84.35% (P->U) (ratio: 48.8%) on calculated overlap ProgressiveAeternus <-> Neoprogressive (Neoprogressive - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:47:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Sigmapi (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Sigmapi <-> Sigma Pi (Sigma Pi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:48:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ProgressiveAeternus (contribs; 3/16) scores 61.73% (U->P) & 64.06% (P->U) (ratio: 39.5%) on calculated overlap ProgressiveAeternus <-> Neoprogressive rock (Neoprogressive rock - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:48:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshlizard (contribs; 2/2) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Joshlizard <-> Lizard (Lizard - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:48:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Social Care Institute for Excellence (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Social Care Institute for Excellence <-> Social Care Institute for Excellence (Social Care Institute for Excellence - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:49:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshlizard (contribs; 3/3) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Joshlizard <-> Lizard (Lizard - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:50:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshlizard (contribs; 4/4) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Joshlizard <-> Lizard (Lizard - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:50:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Unisouls (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Unisouls <-> Unisouls (Unisouls - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:56:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:R3za-remiX (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap R3za-remiX <-> R3za-remiX (R3za-remiX - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:56:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:NWMonster (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap NWMonster <-> NWMonster (NWMonster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:57:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:58:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gowrisreeram (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Gowrisreeram <-> Gowrisreeram (Gowrisreeram - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 09:59:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 1/10) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:00:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gowrisreeram (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Gowrisreeram <-> Gowrisreeram (Gowrisreeram - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:01:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 2/11) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:01:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:03:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 3/12) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:06:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Oisin McGann (contribs; 1/1) scores 88.18% (U->P) & 80.83% (P->U) (ratio: 71.2%) on calculated overlap Oisin McGann <-> Oisín McGann (Oisín McGann - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:07:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Guardianofgood (contribs; 1/2) scores 42.85% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 42.8%) on calculated overlap Guardianofgood <-> Ardian (Ardian - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:07:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Oisin McGann (contribs; 2/2) scores 88.18% (U->P) & 80.83% (P->U) (ratio: 71.2%) on calculated overlap Oisin McGann <-> Oisín McGann (Oisín McGann - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:07:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:R3za-remiX (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap R3za-remiX <-> R3za-remiX (R3za-remiX - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:07:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:07:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Guardianofgood (contribs; 2/3) scores 42.85% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 42.8%) on calculated overlap Guardianofgood <-> Ardian (Ardian - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:09:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:12:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:13:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Shaikeomra (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Shaikeomra <-> Shaikeomra (Shaikeomra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:13:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Shaikeomra (contribs; 2/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Shaikeomra <-> Shaikeomra (Shaikeomra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:14:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Whatsername241 (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Whatsername241 <-> Whatsername241 (Whatsername241 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:20:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 1/1) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:21:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nick heg (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 63.63% (P->U) (ratio: 63.6%) on calculated overlap Nick heg <-> Nick Hegarty (Nick Hegarty - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:25:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Discocrumper (contribs; 1/2) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 76.92% (P->U) (ratio: 64%) on calculated overlap Discocrumper <-> Disco crumping (Disco crumping - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:26:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gowrisreeram (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Gowrisreeram <-> Gowrisreeram (Gowrisreeram - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:28:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gowrisreeram (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Gowrisreeram <-> Gowrisreeram (Gowrisreeram - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:35:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Oruma (contribs; 1/1) scores 58% (U->P) & 58% (P->U) (ratio: 33.6%) on calculated overlap Oruma <-> Oromo (Oromo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:35:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Middlefingers (contribs; 1/123) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Middlefingers <-> Middlefingers (Middlefingers - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:36:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 2/2) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:38:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:40:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:40:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Florentino floro (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 93.75% (P->U) (ratio: 93.7%) on calculated overlap Florentino floro <-> Florentino V. Floro (Florentino V. Floro - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:40:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jperriello12 (contribs; 1/1) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 83.33% (P->U) (ratio: 69.4%) on calculated overlap Jperriello12 <-> Joe perriello (Joe perriello - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:40:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 3/3) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:42:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 4/4) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:43:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 8/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:44:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 9/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:46:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jperriello12 (contribs; 2/2) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 83.33% (P->U) (ratio: 69.4%) on calculated overlap Jperriello12 <-> Joe perriello (Joe perriello - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:48:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 5/5) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:53:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 6/6) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:53:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Euryalus (contribs; 1/8) scores 48.75% (U->P) & 63.18% (P->U) (ratio: 30.8%) on calculated overlap Euryalus <-> Rales (Rales - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:54:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:58:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 7/7) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:59:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Owlett (contribs; 1/1) scores 59.53% (U->P) & 44.1% (P->U) (ratio: 26.2%) on calculated overlap Owlett <-> No Left Turn (No Left Turn - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 10:59:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:00:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 8/8) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:00:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:04:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 9/9) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> BOARD (BOARD - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:07:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BOARD UK (contribs; 10/10) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap BOARD UK <-> Board (Board - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:08:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:10:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:11:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:15:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ikerbasque (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ikerbasque <-> Ikerbasque (Ikerbasque - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:15:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ikerbasque (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ikerbasque <-> Ikerbasque (Ikerbasque - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:16:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ikerbasque (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ikerbasque <-> Ikerbasque (Ikerbasque - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:16:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ikerbasque (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ikerbasque <-> Ikerbasque (Ikerbasque - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:19:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ikerbasque (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Ikerbasque <-> Ikerbasque (Ikerbasque - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:19:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Florentino floro (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 93.75% (P->U) (ratio: 93.7%) on calculated overlap Florentino floro <-> Florentino V. Floro (Florentino V. Floro - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:19:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:22:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:28:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:28:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Deepak6353 (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 36%) on calculated overlap Deepak6353 <-> Deepak goel (Deepak goel - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:29:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:32:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Filip Rankov (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Filip Rankov <-> Filip Rankov (Filip Rankov - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:35:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:35:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ngriffeth (contribs; 1/1) scores 90% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 45%) on calculated overlap Ngriffeth <-> Nancy Davis Griffeth (Nancy Davis Griffeth - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:35:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rimibchatterjee (contribs; 1/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Rimibchatterjee <-> Rimi B. Chatterjee (Rimi B. Chatterjee - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:36:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Baseball Bugs (contribs; 1/35) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 58.19% (P->U) (ratio: 38.7%) on calculated overlap Baseball Bugs <-> Vintage base ball (Vintage base ball - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:38:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stuart Laughton (contribs; 1/13) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stuart Laughton <-> Stuart Laughton (Stuart Laughton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:39:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rimibchatterjee (contribs; 2/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Rimibchatterjee <-> Rimi B. Chatterjee (Rimi B. Chatterjee - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:39:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stuart Laughton (contribs; 2/14) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stuart Laughton <-> Stuart Laughton (Stuart Laughton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:39:57, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ASPATRIA (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap ASPATRIA <-> Aspatria (Aspatria - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:40:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:41:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:43:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 8/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:43:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stuart Laughton (contribs; 3/15) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stuart Laughton <-> Stuart Laughton (Stuart Laughton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:45:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:46:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ASPATRIA (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap ASPATRIA <-> Aspatria (Aspatria - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:47:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stuart Laughton (contribs; 4/16) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stuart Laughton <-> Stuart Laughton (Stuart Laughton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:47:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ASPATRIA (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap ASPATRIA <-> Aspatria (Aspatria - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:47:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chaipau (contribs; 1/6) scores 55.54% (U->P) & 48% (P->U) (ratio: 26.6%) on calculated overlap Chaipau <-> Charyapada (Charyapada - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:48:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ASPATRIA (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap ASPATRIA <-> Aspatria (Aspatria - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:49:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joolsvespertine (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Joolsvespertine <-> Vespertine (Vespertine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:54:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 9/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:54:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Warbola (contribs; 1/1) scores 54.42% (U->P) & 54.42% (P->U) (ratio: 29.6%) on calculated overlap Warbola <-> Warfare (Warfare - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:55:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rheotec (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.81% (P->U) (ratio: 31.8%) on calculated overlap Rheotec <-> RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH (RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:55:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Yak-38M (contribs; 1/1) scores 77.14% (U->P) & 42.85% (P->U) (ratio: 33%) on calculated overlap Yak-38M <-> Yakovlev Yak-38 (Yakovlev Yak-38 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:56:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rheotec (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.81% (P->U) (ratio: 31.8%) on calculated overlap Rheotec <-> RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH (RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:57:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 10/10) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 11:59:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rheotec (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.81% (P->U) (ratio: 31.8%) on calculated overlap Rheotec <-> RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH (RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:03:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 1/13) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:04:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 11/11) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:04:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 12/12) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:05:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:May J"s Boyfriend (contribs; 1/1) scores 26.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 26.6%) on calculated overlap May J"s Boyfriend <-> May J. (May J. - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:07:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:May J"s Boyfriend (contribs; 2/2) scores 26.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 26.6%) on calculated overlap May J"s Boyfriend <-> May J. (May J. - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:08:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 2/14) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:08:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 13/13) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:09:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 3/15) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:09:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 14/14) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:10:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rheotec (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.81% (P->U) (ratio: 31.8%) on calculated overlap Rheotec <-> RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH (RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:10:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valimo wikipedia (contribs; 4/16) scores 57.26% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 35.1%) on calculated overlap Valimo wikipedia <-> Valimo Wireless (Valimo Wireless - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:11:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 15/15) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:12:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 16/16) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:15:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stenchbump (contribs; 17/17) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stenchbump <-> Stench bump (Stench bump - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:16:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rheotec (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.81% (P->U) (ratio: 31.8%) on calculated overlap Rheotec <-> RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH (RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:18:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rheotec (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.81% (P->U) (ratio: 31.8%) on calculated overlap Rheotec <-> RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH (RheoTec Messtechnik GmbH - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:30:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Prashanthpedduri (contribs; 1/1) scores 43.75% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 43.7%) on calculated overlap Prashanthpedduri <-> Pedduri (Pedduri - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:32:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Prashanthpedduri (contribs; 2/2) scores 43.75% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 43.7%) on calculated overlap Prashanthpedduri <-> Pedduri (Pedduri - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:32:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Prashanthpedduri (contribs; 3/3) scores 43.75% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 43.7%) on calculated overlap Prashanthpedduri <-> Pedduri (Pedduri - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:38:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:48:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 2/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:49:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 3/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:51:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 4/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:51:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Simonxag (contribs; 1/2) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Simonxag <-> Monk (Monk - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:53:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 5/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:55:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Acadiastevens (contribs; 1/10) scores 59.45% (U->P) & 63.63% (P->U) (ratio: 37.8%) on calculated overlap Acadiastevens <-> Steven Sills (Steven Sills - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:56:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wardrox (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Wardrox <-> Wardrox (Wardrox - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:56:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 6/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:57:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:KennethGrahameSociety (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap KennethGrahameSociety <-> Kenneth Grahame (Kenneth Grahame - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:58:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aeons (contribs; 1/4) scores 80% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Aeons <-> Radeon (Radeon - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 12:59:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 7/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:01:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 1/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:02:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 8/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:02:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 2/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:04:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dmashuri (contribs; 1/1) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Dmashuri <-> Azat Mashurov (Azat Mashurov - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:04:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Speedpo (contribs; 3/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Speedpo <-> Speedpo (Speedpo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:05:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dmashuri (contribs; 2/2) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Dmashuri <-> Azat Mashurov (Azat Mashurov - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:05:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joolsvespertine (contribs; 1/2) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Joolsvespertine <-> Vespertine (Vespertine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:06:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:08:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 1/1) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:10:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dmashuri (contribs; 3/3) scores 70.87% (U->P) & 43.75% (P->U) (ratio: 31%) on calculated overlap Dmashuri <-> Durnyam Mashurova (Durnyam Mashurova - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:11:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 2/2) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:11:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 9/10) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:12:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BurmesePython (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap BurmesePython <-> Burmese Python (Burmese Python - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:12:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DoorsOpenDays (contribs; 10/11) scores 100% (U->P) & 61.9% (P->U) (ratio: 61.9%) on calculated overlap DoorsOpenDays <-> Doors Open Days Scotland (Doors Open Days Scotland - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:14:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wardrox (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Wardrox <-> Wardrox (Wardrox - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:16:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Elmerdelmundo13 (contribs; 1/1) scores 86.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 86.6%) on calculated overlap Elmerdelmundo13 <-> Elmer Del Mundo (Elmer Del Mundo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:17:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:18:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BurmesePython (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap BurmesePython <-> Burmese Python (Burmese Python - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:19:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:19:57, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 3/3) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:20:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bdve (contribs; 1/54) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/shows/ecw/superstars/johnnynitro/bio/ (John Hennigan - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 13:21:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 4/4) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:23:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 5/5) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:26:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:26:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 6/6) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:26:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:26:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->L) & 83.33% (L->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> mansystems.nl (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 13:26:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kigurumi Loopy (contribs; 1/4) scores 66.58% (U->L) & 54.77% (L->U) (ratio: 36.4%) on calculated overlap Kigurumi Loopy <-> leigh.kigurumi.co.uk (Animegao - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 13:27:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Remember (contribs; 1/2) scores 48.75% (U->P) & 58.5% (P->U) (ratio: 28.5%) on calculated overlap Remember <-> Robert (Robert - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:27:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Remember (contribs; 2/3) scores 48.75% (U->P) & 58.5% (P->U) (ratio: 28.5%) on calculated overlap Remember <-> Robert (Robert - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:28:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Remember (contribs; 3/4) scores 48.75% (U->P) & 58.5% (P->U) (ratio: 28.5%) on calculated overlap Remember <-> Robert (Robert - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:29:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 7/7) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:30:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:30:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Delmundoelmer (contribs; 1/1) scores 61.53% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 61.5%) on calculated overlap Delmundoelmer <-> Elmer Del Mundo (Elmer Del Mundo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:31:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 8/8) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:33:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Delmundoelmer (contribs; 2/2) scores 61.53% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 61.5%) on calculated overlap Delmundoelmer <-> Elmer Del Mundo (Elmer Del Mundo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:37:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 9/9) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:40:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 10/10) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:40:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 8/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:40:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 9/9) scores 100% (U->L) & 83.33% (L->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> mansystems.nl (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 13:41:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 11/11) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:45:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Geeziemc (contribs; 1/1) scores 75% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Geeziemc <-> Geezie (Geezie - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:46:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tireiron1 (contribs; 1/3) scores 88.88% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 88.8%) on calculated overlap Tireiron1 <-> Tire iron (Tire iron - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:52:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kerryman (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Kerryman <-> Kerryman (Kerryman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:55:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MetraTech (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap MetraTech <-> Metratech (Metratech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:55:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Icar (contribs; 1/3) scores 65.25% (U->L) & 48.33% (L->U) (ratio: 31.5%) on calculated overlap Icar <-> ziua.ro (Vladimir Tismăneanu - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 13:59:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GOA Netika (contribs; 1/10) scores 100% (U->P) & 69.23% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap GOA Netika <-> GOA Netikatech (GOA Netikatech - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 13:59:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mansystems (contribs; 10/10) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mansystems <-> Mansystems (Mansystems - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:00:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bsroiaadn (contribs; 1/7) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/superstars/wwealumni/therock/bio/\|title=the (The Rock (entertainer) - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:00:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bsroiaadn (contribs; 2/8) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/superstars/wwealumni/therock/bio/ (The Rock (entertainer) - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:03:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakesala (contribs; 12/12) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 67.5% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Jakesala <-> Esan (Esan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:09:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Emanuelxavier (contribs; 1/17) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Emanuelxavier <-> Emanuel Xavier (Emanuel Xavier - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:09:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Idahogordons (contribs; 1/1) scores 56.07% (U->P) & 67.29% (P->U) (ratio: 37.7%) on calculated overlap Idahogordons <-> Clan Gordon (Clan Gordon - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:09:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 1/1) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:10:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bdve (contribs; 2/55) Monitored link - www.tnawrestling.com/news/fullnews2.php?all=1182 (List of professional wrestling match types - diff - JB196 case - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:10:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Amake (contribs; 1/2) scores 58% (U->P) & 58% (P->U) (ratio: 33.6%) on calculated overlap Amake <-> Ramen (Ramen - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:13:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Amake (contribs; 2/3) scores 58% (U->P) & 58% (P->U) (ratio: 33.6%) on calculated overlap Amake <-> Ramen (Ramen - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:13:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nieran (contribs; 1/1) scores 48.33% (U->P) & 52.2% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap Nieran <-> Loner (Loner - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:15:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fliega (contribs; 1/9) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 46.2% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Fliega <-> FlightGear (FlightGear - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:16:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Witchzilla (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.infomat.com/whoswho/ralphlauren.html (Ralph Lauren - diff - ip <IP_ADDRESS> spammed link - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:17:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Idahogordons (contribs; 2/2) scores 56.07% (U->P) & 67.29% (P->U) (ratio: 37.7%) on calculated overlap Idahogordons <-> Clan Gordon (Clan Gordon - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:18:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wardrox (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Wardrox <-> Wardrox (Wardrox - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:18:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Idahogordons (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->L) & 80% (L->U) (ratio: 80%) on calculated overlap Idahogordons <-> idahogordons.org (Clan Gordon - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:18:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wardrox (contribs; 2/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Wardrox <-> Wardrox (Wardrox - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:19:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wardrox (contribs; 3/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Wardrox <-> Wardrox (Wardrox - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:19:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gewürztraminer (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Gewürztraminer <-> Gewürztraminer (Gewürztraminer - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:21:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wardrox (contribs; 4/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Wardrox <-> Wardrox (Wardrox - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:24:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Codelyoko193 (contribs; 1/16) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Codelyoko193 <-> Code Lyoko (video game) (Code Lyoko (video game) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:24:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bdve (contribs; 2/56) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/wcwppv/starrcade83.html (List of professional wrestling match types - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:24:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bdve (contribs; 3/57) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/raw/031103.html (List of professional wrestling match types - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:24:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bdve (contribs; 4/58) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/raw/021014.html (List of professional wrestling match types - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:24:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bdve (contribs; 5/59) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/superstars/wwereferees/guestrefe (List of professional wrestling match types - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:25:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nieran (contribs; 2/2) scores 48.33% (U->P) & 52.2% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap Nieran <-> Loner (Loner - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:29:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cougarvision (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Cougarvision <-> Cougar vision (Cougar vision - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:30:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kalaha (contribs; 1/1) scores 57.15% (U->P) & 47.62% (P->U) (ratio: 27.2%) on calculated overlap Kalaha <-> Lalandia (Lalandia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:31:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kalaha (contribs; 2/2) scores 57.15% (U->P) & 47.62% (P->U) (ratio: 27.2%) on calculated overlap Kalaha <-> Lalandia (Lalandia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:34:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 2/2) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:34:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ronbryson1 (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Ronbryson1 <-> Bryson (Bryson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:35:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 3/3) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:40:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Madsurrealist (contribs; 1/4) scores 76.92% (U->P) & 62.5% (P->U) (ratio: 48%) on calculated overlap Madsurrealist <-> Surrealist groups (Surrealist groups - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:42:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GregDolman (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GregDolman <-> Greg dolman (Greg dolman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:43:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ostrom (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Ostrom <-> Hans Ostrom (Hans Ostrom - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:44:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DrHok (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap DrHok <-> Hok (Hok - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:44:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Madsurrealist (contribs; 2/5) scores 76.92% (U->P) & 90% (P->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap Madsurrealist <-> Surrealism (Surrealism - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:46:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nieran (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nieran <-> Nieran (Nieran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:48:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nieran (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nieran <-> Nieran (Nieran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:50:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 4/4) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:52:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 5/5) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:53:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fang 23 (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/shows/survivorseries/history/2001/results/ (World Championship Wrestling - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:53:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fang 23 (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/shows/vengeance/history/vengeance2001/mainevent/ (World Championship Wrestling - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:53:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fang 23 (contribs; 3/3) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/unitedstates/ (World Championship Wrestling - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 14:53:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:YorkHighSchool (contribs; 1/1) scores 90% (U->P) & 60.86% (P->U) (ratio: 54.7%) on calculated overlap YorkHighSchool <-> York Community High School (York Community High School - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:53:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 6/6) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:54:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ostrom (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Ostrom <-> Hans Ostrom (Hans Ostrom - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:56:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ncnhr (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 83.33% (P->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Ncnhr <-> Nccnhr (Nccnhr - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:57:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 7/7) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:58:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smug6 (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Smug6 <-> Smug6 (Smug6 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:59:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 8/8) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 14:59:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:All hallows on the wall (contribs; 1/1) scores 67.63% (U->P) & 67.06% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap All hallows on the wall <-> All Hallows-on-the-Wall (All Hallows-on-the-Wall - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:01:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aphillipe (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 75% (P->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aphillipe <-> Adam phillipe (Adam phillipe - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:02:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Turi Munthe (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 27.6%) on calculated overlap Turi Munthe <-> Malcolm Munthe (Malcolm Munthe - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:03:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hatzigiannis fan (contribs; 9/9) scores 80% (U->P) & 64.05% (P->U) (ratio: 51.2%) on calculated overlap Hatzigiannis fan <-> Michalis Hatzigiannis (Michalis Hatzigiannis - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:08:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:PorkSalcho (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap PorkSalcho <-> Pork salcho (Pork salcho - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:08:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Oregon78 (contribs; 1/1) scores 75% (U->L) & 66.66% (L->U) (ratio: 49.9%) on calculated overlap Oregon78 <-> oregon.gov (Oregon Ballot Measure 67 (1998) - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:10:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:PorkSalcho (contribs; 2/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap PorkSalcho <-> Pork salcho (Pork salcho - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:11:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chavagnes (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.03% (P->U) (ratio: 31%) on calculated overlap Chavagnes <-> Chavagnes International College (Chavagnes International College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:12:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chavagnes (contribs; 2/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 31.03% (P->U) (ratio: 31%) on calculated overlap Chavagnes <-> Chavagnes International College (Chavagnes International College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:12:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aaronfyke (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Aaronfyke <-> Aaron fyke (Aaron fyke - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:13:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fliega (contribs; 2/10) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 46.2% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Fliega <-> FlightGear (FlightGear - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:13:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fliega (contribs; 3/11) Monitored link - www.pcmag.co.uk/computeractive/downloads/2163376/flightgear (FlightGear - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:13:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aaronfyke (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Aaronfyke <-> Aaron fyke (Aaron fyke - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:14:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thichnhattu (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Thichnhattu <-> Thich Nhat Tu (Thich Nhat Tu - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:14:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aaronfyke (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Aaronfyke <-> Aaron fyke (Aaron fyke - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:15:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 1/1) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:15:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aaronfyke (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Aaronfyke <-> Aaron fyke (Aaron fyke - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:16:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:IanTurvill (contribs; 1/1) scores 72.09% (U->P) & 40.45% (P->U) (ratio: 29.1%) on calculated overlap IanTurvill <-> Marlene Morrison Turvill (Marlene Morrison Turvill - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:17:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:YorkHighSchool (contribs; 2/2) scores 90% (U->P) & 60.86% (P->U) (ratio: 54.7%) on calculated overlap YorkHighSchool <-> York Community High School (York Community High School - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:20:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 64.28% (P->U) (ratio: 64.2%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> Aspect magazine (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:22:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 2/2) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:22:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:JIP (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 26.6%) on calculated overlap JIP <-> Sipoo (Sipoo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:22:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 3/3) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:22:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Davidadavidson (contribs; 1/2) scores 92.85% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 92.8%) on calculated overlap Davidadavidson <-> David Davidson (David Davidson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:23:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonjour Quebec (contribs; 1/1) scores 46.15% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 46.1%) on calculated overlap Bonjour Quebec <-> Quebec (Quebec - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:23:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonjour Quebec (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->L) & 81.25% (L->U) (ratio: 81.2%) on calculated overlap Bonjour Quebec <-> bonjourquebec.com (Quebec - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:23:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonjour Quebec (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->L) & 81.25% (L->U) (ratio: 81.2%) on calculated overlap Bonjour Quebec <-> bonjourquebec.com (Quebec - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:23:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonjour Quebec (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->L) & 81.25% (L->U) (ratio: 81.2%) on calculated overlap Bonjour Quebec <-> bonjourquebec.com (Quebec - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:23:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonjour Quebec (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->L) & 81.25% (L->U) (ratio: 81.2%) on calculated overlap Bonjour Quebec <-> bonjourquebec.com (Quebec - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:23:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonjour Quebec (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->L) & 81.25% (L->U) (ratio: 81.2%) on calculated overlap Bonjour Quebec <-> bonjourquebec.com (Quebec - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:23:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonjour Quebec (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->L) & 81.25% (L->U) (ratio: 81.2%) on calculated overlap Bonjour Quebec <-> bonjourquebec.com (Quebec - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:23:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Luigifan (contribs; 1/1) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 62.5%) on calculated overlap Luigifan <-> Luigi (Luigi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:24:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Eliran Son (contribs; 1/2) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 86.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.7%) on calculated overlap Eliran Son <-> Ron Eliran (Ron Eliran - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:24:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 4/4) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:25:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Altaileopard (contribs; 1/33) scores 64.4% (U->P) & 70.26% (P->U) (ratio: 45.2%) on calculated overlap Altaileopard <-> Amur Leopard (Amur Leopard - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:25:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Avecchione (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap idahohistory.net - idahohistory.net; Avecchione -> idahohistory.net (Amy Vecchione works at the Idaho State Historical Society); (Smokejumper - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:25:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Altaileopard (contribs; 2/34) scores 58.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 58.3%) on calculated overlap Altaileopard <-> Leopard (Leopard - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:26:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 5/5) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:27:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Zipdrugs (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->L) & 72.72% (L->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Zipdrugs <-> zipdrugs.com (Online pharmacy - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:27:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 6/6) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:28:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 7/7) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:28:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GhostHunterOz (contribs; 1/5) scores 38.46% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 38.4%) on calculated overlap GhostHunterOz <-> Ghost (Ghost - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:28:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:John2343456 (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - wikihelp.prohosts.org (Fantastic Four - diff - wikibanner spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:28:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 8/8) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:28:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 9/9) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:29:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 10/10) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:29:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smug6 (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Smug6 <-> Smug6 (Smug6 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:31:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:John2343456 (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - wikihelp.prohosts.org (Celebrity sex tape - diff - wikibanner spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:33:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Osoziani (contribs; 1/1) scores 72.62% (U->P) & 64.55% (P->U) (ratio: 46.8%) on calculated overlap Osoziani <-> Omar Ziani (Omar Ziani - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:33:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Halmstad (contribs; 1/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 72.72% (P->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Halmstad <-> Halmstads BK (Halmstads BK - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:34:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GhostHunterOz (contribs; 2/6) scores 38.46% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 38.4%) on calculated overlap GhostHunterOz <-> Ghost (Ghost - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:34:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 1/16) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:35:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Custerwest (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->L) & 76.92% (L->U) (ratio: 76.9%) on calculated overlap Custerwest <-> custerwest.org (Battle of Washita River - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:36:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DBWikis (contribs; 1/1) scores 41.42% (U->P) & 65.25% (P->U) (ratio: 27%) on calculated overlap DBWikis <-> Wits (Wits - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:36:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 11/11) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:38:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Human Tissue Authority (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Human Tissue Authority <-> Human Tissue Authority (Human Tissue Authority - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:38:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 2/17) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:38:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 12/12) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:39:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tone (contribs; 1/1) scores 67.5% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 33.7%) on calculated overlap Tone <-> Traxon (Traxon - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:39:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 3/18) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:39:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 13/13) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:39:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 14/14) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:40:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Louisevrebosch (contribs; 15/15) scores 62.34% (U->P) & 72.74% (P->U) (ratio: 45.3%) on calculated overlap Louisevrebosch <-> Bill Vrebosch (Bill Vrebosch - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:43:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Sosomk (contribs; 1/7) Monitored link - www.doingbusiness.org/economyrankings/ (Georgia (country) - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:44:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jelley17 (contribs; 1/1) scores 75% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 34.6%) on calculated overlap Jelley17 <-> Stephen Jelley (Stephen Jelley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:46:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 64.28% (P->U) (ratio: 64.2%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> Aspect magazine (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:46:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:46:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:46:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:46:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:46:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:47:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 4/19) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:48:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Human Tissue Authority (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Human Tissue Authority <-> Human Tissue Authority (Human Tissue Authority - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:48:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 5/20) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:48:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:03taylorc (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap 03taylorc <-> Chris j Taylor (Chris j Taylor - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:48:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 1/19) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:48:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:03taylorc (contribs; 2/2) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap 03taylorc <-> Chris j Taylor (Chris j Taylor - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:49:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 2/20) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:49:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Human Tissue Authority (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Human Tissue Authority <-> Human Tissue Authority (Human Tissue Authority - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:49:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 6/21) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:50:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Human Tissue Authority (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Human Tissue Authority <-> Human Tissue Authority (Human Tissue Authority - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:50:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 3/21) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:50:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 7/22) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:51:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Human Tissue Authority (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Human Tissue Authority <-> Human Tissue Authority (Human Tissue Authority - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:51:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Brucewydner (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Brucewydner <-> Bruce Wydner (Bruce Wydner - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:51:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stepney (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 41.17% (L->U) (ratio: 41.1%) on calculated overlap Stepney <-> stepneyfutures.com (Pivot point calculations - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:52:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 8/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 64.28% (P->U) (ratio: 64.2%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> Aspect magazine (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:52:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Brucewydner (contribs; 2/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Brucewydner <-> Bruce Wydner (Bruce Wydner - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:53:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:03taylorc (contribs; 3/3) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap 03taylorc <-> Chris j Taylor (Chris j Taylor - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:54:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Brucewydner (contribs; 3/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Brucewydner <-> Bruce Wydner (Bruce Wydner - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:54:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wayneamlwch (contribs; 1/1) scores 65.28% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 32.6%) on calculated overlap Wayneamlwch <-> Amlwch Town F.C. (Amlwch Town F.C. - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:54:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 9/9) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:54:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 10/10) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:54:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 11/11) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:54:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 12/12) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:54:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 13/13) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> aspectmag.com (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 15:55:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wayneamlwch (contribs; 2/2) scores 65.28% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 32.6%) on calculated overlap Wayneamlwch <-> Amlwch Town F.C. (Amlwch Town F.C. - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:56:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 4/22) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:56:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jelley17 (contribs; 2/2) scores 75% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 34.6%) on calculated overlap Jelley17 <-> Stephen Jelley (Stephen Jelley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:57:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jelley17 (contribs; 3/3) scores 75% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 34.6%) on calculated overlap Jelley17 <-> Stephen Jelley (Stephen Jelley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:57:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mediclink (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mediclink <-> Mediclink (Mediclink - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:57:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mediclink (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mediclink <-> Mediclink (Mediclink - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:57:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jelley17 (contribs; 4/4) scores 75% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 34.6%) on calculated overlap Jelley17 <-> Stephen Jelley (Stephen Jelley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:58:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Hopeful33 (contribs; 1/2) scores 44.44% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 44.4%) on calculated overlap Hopeful33 <-> Hope (Hope - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:58:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jelley17 (contribs; 5/5) scores 75% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 34.6%) on calculated overlap Jelley17 <-> Stephen Jelley (Stephen Jelley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:59:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jelley17 (contribs; 6/6) scores 75% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 34.6%) on calculated overlap Jelley17 <-> Stephen Jelley (Stephen Jelley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:59:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Oundle harding (contribs; 1/5) scores 46.15% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 46.1%) on calculated overlap Oundle harding <-> Oundle (Oundle - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:59:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 5/23) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 15:59:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lcarus27 (contribs; 1/7) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 83.33% (P->U) (ratio: 52%) on calculated overlap Lcarus27 <-> Icarus (Icarus - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:00:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - gizmodo.com/gadgets/omg-important-news%21/breaking-first-in-line-guy-is-a-pro-linesitter-sweats-a-lot-272849.php (Greg Packer - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 16:00:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Oundle harding (contribs; 2/6) scores 46.15% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 46.1%) on calculated overlap Oundle harding <-> Oundle (Oundle - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:01:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lcarus27 (contribs; 2/8) scores 62.5% (U->L) & 50% (L->U) (ratio: 31.2%) on calculated overlap Lcarus27 <-> icarus3.com (Icarus - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 16:01:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mediclink (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Mediclink <-> Mediclink (Mediclink - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:02:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 6/24) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:02:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 8/23) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:02:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:JGXenite (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap JGXenite <-> Unite (Unite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:03:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 9/24) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:04:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fliega (contribs; 3/12) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 46.2% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Fliega <-> FlightGear (FlightGear - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:04:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 7/25) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:05:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 8/26) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:07:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 9/27) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:07:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bonniesteiglitz (contribs; 1/3) scores 72.68% (U->P) & 68.14% (P->U) (ratio: 49.5%) on calculated overlap Bonniesteiglitz <-> Kenneth Steiglitz (Kenneth Steiglitz - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:08:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Meerkat Manor more info (contribs; 10/28) scores 60% (U->P) & 92.3% (P->U) (ratio: 55.3%) on calculated overlap Meerkat Manor more info <-> Meerkat manor 2 (Meerkat manor 2 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:09:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Aspectmag (contribs; 14/14) scores 100% (U->P) & 64.28% (P->U) (ratio: 64.2%) on calculated overlap Aspectmag <-> Aspect magazine (Aspect magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:11:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Pdtrueblood (contribs; 1/1) scores 90% (U->P) & 70.71% (P->U) (ratio: 63.6%) on calculated overlap Pdtrueblood <-> Peter Trueblood (Peter Trueblood - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:11:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:JGXenite (contribs; 2/2) scores 50% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap JGXenite <-> Unite (Unite - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:12:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bjenks (contribs; 1/6) scores 73.5% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 33.4%) on calculated overlap Bjenks <-> Jean Jenkins (Jean Jenkins - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:15:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Britishbusiness (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 78.94% (P->U) (ratio: 78.9%) on calculated overlap Britishbusiness <-> British Business Club (British Business Club - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:17:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ruffruffman12345 (contribs; 1/1) scores 68.75% (U->P) & 52.38% (P->U) (ratio: 36%) on calculated overlap Ruffruffman12345 <-> FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman (FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:19:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Womenscommission (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 84.21% (L->U) (ratio: 84.2%) on calculated overlap Womenscommission <-> womenscommission.org (Women's Commission For Refugee Women and Children - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 16:22:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:John2343456 (contribs; 3/3) Monitored link - wikihelp.prohosts.org (Fantastic Four - diff - wikibanner spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 16:23:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chebbs (contribs; 1/1) scores 48.33% (U->P) & 52.2% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap Chebbs <-> Gheos (Gheos - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:24:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fliega (contribs; 2/13) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 46.2% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Fliega <-> FlightGear (FlightGear - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:24:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chebbs (contribs; 2/2) scores 48.33% (U->P) & 52.2% (P->U) (ratio: 25.2%) on calculated overlap Chebbs <-> Gheos (Gheos - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:26:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smug6 (contribs; 2/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Smug6 <-> Smug6 (Smug6 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:26:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Prasenjitm (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Prasenjitm <-> Prasenjit Mandal (Prasenjit Mandal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:27:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Splitheads (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Splitheads <-> Split (Split - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:30:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smug6 (contribs; 2/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Smug6 <-> Smug6 (Smug6 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:31:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bjenks (contribs; 2/7) scores 73.5% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 33.4%) on calculated overlap Bjenks <-> Jean Jenkins (Jean Jenkins - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:39:57, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dangerjim (contribs; 1/10) scores 60.56% (U->L) & 45.4% (L->U) (ratio: 27.4%) on calculated overlap Dangerjim <-> soundrangers.com (Sound effect - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 16:40:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joebradshaw2k6 (contribs; 1/1) scores 78.57% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 78.5%) on calculated overlap Joebradshaw2k6 <-> Joe bradshaw (Joe bradshaw - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:43:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joebradshaw2k6 (contribs; 2/2) scores 78.57% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 78.5%) on calculated overlap Joebradshaw2k6 <-> Joe bradshaw (Joe bradshaw - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:48:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kihae (contribs; 1/1) scores 60% (U->P) & 42.85% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap Kihae <-> Dong Hae (Dong Hae - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:50:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Splitheads (contribs; 2/2) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Splitheads <-> Split (Split - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:50:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Splitheads (contribs; 3/3) scores 54% (U->L) & 48.06% (L->U) (ratio: 25.9%) on calculated overlap Splitheads <-> promet-split.hr (Split - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 16:53:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mrspoynter103 (contribs; 1/1) scores 53.84% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 28.9%) on calculated overlap Mrspoynter103 <-> Dougie Poynter (Dougie Poynter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:54:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Can't sleep, clown will eat me (contribs; 1/2) Monitored link - www.accelerator3359.com/wrestling/bios/bagwell.html (Buff Bagwell - diff - jb196 case - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 16:55:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kihae (contribs; 2/2) scores 60% (U->P) & 42.85% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap Kihae <-> Dong Hae (Dong Hae - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:55:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kihae (contribs; 3/3) scores 60% (U->P) & 42.85% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap Kihae <-> Dong Hae (Dong Hae - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 16:57:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cnotgate (contribs; 1/3) scores 90% (U->P) & 47.05% (P->U) (ratio: 42.3%) on calculated overlap Cnotgate <-> Controlled NOT gate (Controlled NOT gate - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:00:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Zerorules677 (contribs; 1/16) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/intercontinental/322760 (Randy Orton - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:00:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mrtobacco (contribs; 1/3) scores 86.77% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 43.3%) on calculated overlap Mrtobacco <-> Tobacco smoking (Tobacco smoking - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:02:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Splitheads (contribs; 4/4) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Splitheads <-> Split (Split - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:03:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fliega (contribs; 3/14) scores 62.37% (U->P) & 46.2% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Fliega <-> FlightGear (FlightGear - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:03:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bjenks (contribs; 3/8) scores 73.5% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 33.4%) on calculated overlap Bjenks <-> Jean Jenkins (Jean Jenkins - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:03:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:T!rpak (contribs; 1/1) scores 58.5% (U->P) & 43.33% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap T!rpak <-> Tirpaccus (Tirpaccus - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:05:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Williamespo (contribs; 1/1) scores 64.27% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 38.5%) on calculated overlap Williamespo <-> Will Esposito (Will Esposito - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:05:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joebengo (contribs; 1/6) scores 71.61% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 35.8%) on calculated overlap Joebengo <-> Bengoechea (Bengoechea - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:06:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Oakster (contribs; 1/22) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/news/detailedbenoittimeline\|title=detailed (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:08:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ldellanom (contribs; 2/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 52.94% (P->U) (ratio: 52.9%) on calculated overlap Ldellanom <-> Luis de Llano Macedo (Luis de Llano Macedo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:09:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Zerorules677 (contribs; 2/17) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/worldheavyweight/30445414211 (Randy Orton - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:09:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Smuggler Production Company (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Smuggler Production Company <-> Smuggler production company (Smuggler production company - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:09:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nickomargolies (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nickomargolies <-> Nickomargolies (Nickomargolies - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:11:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Sweet Diva (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/melina/ (Melina Perez - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:14:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Sthenel (contribs; 1/13) scores 57.14% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 38%) on calculated overlap Sthenel <-> Athens (Athens - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:15:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tones benefit (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.doingbusiness.org/economyrankings/ (Georgia (country) - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:15:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:SirFozzie (contribs; 1/3) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/content/media/video/vms/none/2007/june22-28/4967786?section=%2finside%2fnews%2fchairmanbenoit\|title=vince (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:17:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tones benefit (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - www.doingbusiness.org/economyrankings/ (Georgia (country) - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:19:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wiki simulation (contribs; 1/1) scores 76.63% (U->P) & 56.46% (P->U) (ratio: 43.2%) on calculated overlap Wiki simulation <-> Business Simulations (Business Simulations - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:19:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Numbo3 (contribs; 1/2) scores 33.33% (U->P) & 90% (P->U) (ratio: 29.9%) on calculated overlap Numbo3 <-> .no (.no - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:21:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nishantkumar nift (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Nishantkumar nift <-> Nishantkumar nift (Nishantkumar nift - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:23:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Numbo3 (contribs; 3/4) scores 33.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap Numbo3 <-> .nu (.nu - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:24:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshirocky (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Joshirocky <-> Joshirocky (Joshirocky - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:24:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - gizmodo.com/gadgets/the-death-of-innocence/photoshop-greg-sweaty-linesitter-packer-for-the-good-of-humanity-273171.php (Greg Packer - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:24:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - gizmodo.com/gadgets/omg-important-news%21/breaking-first-in-line-guy-is-a-pro-linesitter-sweats-a-lot-272849.php (Greg Packer - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:24:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wiki simulation (contribs; 2/2) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 71.42% (P->U) (ratio: 51%) on calculated overlap Wiki simulation <-> Simulation game (Simulation game - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:25:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Punchytable (contribs; 1/1) scores 54.54% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 54.5%) on calculated overlap Punchytable <-> Punchy (Punchy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:27:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Punchytable (contribs; 2/2) scores 54.54% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 54.5%) on calculated overlap Punchytable <-> Punchy (Punchy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:27:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 1/25) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:27:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 2/26) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:27:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 3/27) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:29:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 4/28) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:30:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bjenks (contribs; 3/9) scores 73.5% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 33.4%) on calculated overlap Bjenks <-> Jean Jenkins (Jean Jenkins - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:35:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cnponline (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 75% (L->U) (ratio: 75%) on calculated overlap Cnponline <-> cnponline.org (Center for National Policy - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:42:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:T!rpak (contribs; 2/2) scores 58.5% (U->P) & 43.33% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap T!rpak <-> Tirpaccus (Tirpaccus - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:43:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:T!rpak (contribs; 3/3) scores 58.5% (U->P) & 43.33% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap T!rpak <-> Tirpaccus (Tirpaccus - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:44:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BobZeppelin (contribs; 1/1) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 72.72% (P->U) (ratio: 52.8%) on calculated overlap BobZeppelin <-> Led Zeppelin (Led Zeppelin - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:46:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Frankfrenett (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Frankfrenett <-> Frank Frenett (Frank Frenett - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:46:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:T!rpak (contribs; 4/4) scores 58.5% (U->P) & 43.33% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap T!rpak <-> Tirpaccus (Tirpaccus - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:51:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Shoelace (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 47.05% (L->U) (ratio: 47%) on calculated overlap Shoelace <-> untied.shoelace.org (Leon del Muerte - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:51:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Muffincake428 (contribs; 1/1) scores 76.92% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 76.9%) on calculated overlap Muffincake428 <-> Muffincake (Muffincake - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:52:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Shoelace (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->L) & 47.05% (L->U) (ratio: 47%) on calculated overlap Shoelace <-> untied.shoelace.org (Leon del Muerte - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 17:54:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Labourr00lz (contribs; 1/1) scores 60.51% (U->P) & 60.51% (P->U) (ratio: 36.6%) on calculated overlap Labourr00lz <-> Labour Party (Labour Party - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:54:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thechois (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Thechois <-> The Chois (The Chois - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:54:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:OHWiki (contribs; 1/3) scores 48.33% (U->P) & 65.25% (P->U) (ratio: 31.5%) on calculated overlap OHWiki <-> Ohio (Ohio - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:57:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thechois (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Thechois <-> The chois (The chois - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:58:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Linguistlist (contribs; 1/25) scores 75% (U->P) & 80% (P->U) (ratio: 60%) on calculated overlap Linguistlist <-> List of linguists (List of linguists - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:58:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 5/29) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 17:59:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Charles Johnsons Wang (contribs; 1/1) scores 53.71% (U->P) & 59.09% (P->U) (ratio: 31.7%) on calculated overlap Charles Johnsons Wang <-> Charles Foster Johnson (Charles Foster Johnson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:00:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 6/30) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:02:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Maintainj (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Maintainj <-> MaintainJ (MaintainJ - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:02:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Numbo3 (contribs; 5/6) scores 33.33% (U->P) & 90% (P->U) (ratio: 29.9%) on calculated overlap Numbo3 <-> .mo (.mo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:03:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 7/31) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:04:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.buffyandlola.com/ (Internet pornography - diff - link is blacklisted on shadowbot - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:04:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The-G-Unit-Boss (contribs; 1/119) scores 51.8% (U->P) & 49.71% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap The-G-Unit-Boss <-> G-Unit Records (G-Unit Records - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:04:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lvmtridas (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap newmedia.ufm.edu - newmedia.ufm.edu; Lvmtridas -> newmedia.ufm.edu (WP:ANI - possible spamming); (Universidad Francisco Marroquín - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:04:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - www.buffyandlola.com/ (Thumbnail - diff - link is blacklisted on shadowbot - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:05:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lvmtridas (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap newmedia.ufm.edu - newmedia.ufm.edu; Lvmtridas -> newmedia.ufm.edu (WP:ANI - possible spamming); (Universidad Francisco Marroquín - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:05:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Muffincake428 (contribs; 2/2) scores 76.92% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 76.9%) on calculated overlap Muffincake428 <-> Muffincake (Muffincake - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:06:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Art 281 (contribs; 1/15) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/shows/vengeance/matches/40811641115/results/ (Candice Michelle - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:08:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lvmtridas (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap newmedia.ufm.edu - newmedia.ufm.edu; Lvmtridas -> newmedia.ufm.edu (WP:ANI - possible spamming); (Universidad Francisco Marroquín - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:08:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The-G-Unit-Boss (contribs; 2/120) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap The-G-Unit-Boss <-> G-Unit (G-Unit - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:10:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mannoset (contribs; 1/1) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 87% (P->U) (ratio: 32.6%) on calculated overlap Mannoset <-> Mat (Mat - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:12:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Charles Johnsons Wang (contribs; 2/2) scores 53.71% (U->P) & 59.09% (P->U) (ratio: 31.7%) on calculated overlap Charles Johnsons Wang <-> Charles Foster Johnson (Charles Foster Johnson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:12:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Wikid77 (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.squidoo.com/originalmardigras/ (Mardi Gras in Mobile - diff - wt:wpspam squidoo.com - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:13:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mannoset (contribs; 2/2) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 87% (P->U) (ratio: 32.6%) on calculated overlap Mannoset <-> Mat (Mat - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:15:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ASurovov (contribs; 1/1) scores 90% (U->L) & 50% (L->U) (ratio: 45%) on calculated overlap ASurovov <-> alexissurovov.com (Yale Anglers' Journal - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:17:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:EIranica (contribs; 1/3) scores 87.5% (U->L) & 70% (L->U) (ratio: 61.2%) on calculated overlap EIranica <-> iranica.com (Alikozai - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:17:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Frisconian (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.56% (U->P) & 56.07% (P->U) (ratio: 37.3%) on calculated overlap Frisconian <-> Frisco, Texas (Frisco, Texas - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:17:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Frisconian (contribs; 2/2) scores 59.22% (U->L) & 46.61% (L->U) (ratio: 27.6%) on calculated overlap Frisconian <-> frisco-online.com (Frisco, Texas - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:18:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fallinboy (contribs; 1/9) scores 66.99% (U->P) & 67% (P->U) (ratio: 44.8%) on calculated overlap Fallinboy <-> Fall Out Boy (Fall Out Boy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:18:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Haris.tv (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->L) & 100% (L->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Haris.tv <-> haris.tv (FeedBurner - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:18:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fallinboy (contribs; 2/10) scores 66.99% (U->P) & 67% (P->U) (ratio: 44.8%) on calculated overlap Fallinboy <-> Fall Out Boy (Fall Out Boy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:19:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Frisconian (contribs; 3/3) scores 66.56% (U->P) & 56.07% (P->U) (ratio: 37.3%) on calculated overlap Frisconian <-> Frisco, Texas (Frisco, Texas - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:20:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berrey7 (contribs; 1/1) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 85.7%) on calculated overlap Berrey7 <-> Berrey (Berrey - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:21:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Abiola99 (contribs; 1/1) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Abiola99 <-> Abiola Abrams (Abiola Abrams - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:21:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Frisconian (contribs; 4/4) scores 66.56% (U->P) & 56.07% (P->U) (ratio: 37.3%) on calculated overlap Frisconian <-> Frisco, Texas (Frisco, Texas - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:21:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Frisconian (contribs; 5/5) scores 59.22% (U->L) & 46.61% (L->U) (ratio: 27.6%) on calculated overlap Frisconian <-> frisco-online.com (Frisco, Texas - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:22:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Robsoule (contribs; 1/1) scores 72.62% (U->P) & 58.1% (P->U) (ratio: 42.1%) on calculated overlap Robsoule <-> Debra Soule (Debra Soule - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:24:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Parmil (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Parmil <-> Parmil (Parmil - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:25:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:AlbertSM (contribs; 1/19) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 28.4%) on calculated overlap AlbertSM <-> Robert Spano (Robert Spano - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:26:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mannoset (contribs; 3/3) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 87% (P->U) (ratio: 32.6%) on calculated overlap Mannoset <-> Mat (Mat - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:27:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:EIranica (contribs; 2/4) scores 87.5% (U->L) & 70% (L->U) (ratio: 61.2%) on calculated overlap EIranica <-> iranica.com (Afghan - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:28:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dlamport (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 57.14% (P->U) (ratio: 57.1%) on calculated overlap Dlamport <-> Derek T.A. Lamport (Derek T.A. Lamport - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:28:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Paypal2 (contribs; 1/1) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 85.7%) on calculated overlap Paypal2 <-> PayPal (PayPal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:29:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lvmtridas (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap newmedia.ufm.edu - newmedia.ufm.edu; Lvmtridas -> newmedia.ufm.edu (WP:ANI - possible spamming); (Universidad Francisco Marroquín - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:29:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:AlbertSM (contribs; 2/20) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 28.4%) on calculated overlap AlbertSM <-> Robert Spano (Robert Spano - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:29:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Paypal2 (contribs; 2/2) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 85.7%) on calculated overlap Paypal2 <-> PayPal (PayPal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:29:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Paypal2 (contribs; 3/3) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 85.7%) on calculated overlap Paypal2 <-> PayPal (PayPal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:29:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Faireire (contribs; 1/1) scores 47.5% (U->L) & 61.56% (L->U) (ratio: 29.2%) on calculated overlap Faireire <-> rte.ie (Róisín Egenton - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:29:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:AlbertSM (contribs; 3/21) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 45.45% (P->U) (ratio: 28.4%) on calculated overlap AlbertSM <-> Robert Spano (Robert Spano - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:30:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mannoset (contribs; 4/4) scores 37.5% (U->P) & 87% (P->U) (ratio: 32.6%) on calculated overlap Mannoset <-> Mat (Mat - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:31:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anchoress (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/news/sherripasses (Sherri Martel - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:31:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dizisoft (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Dizisoft <-> DiZiSoft (DiZiSoft - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:32:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:EIranica (contribs; 3/5) scores 87.5% (U->L) & 70% (L->U) (ratio: 61.2%) on calculated overlap EIranica <-> iranica.com (Jamal al-Din al-Afghani - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:32:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dizisoft (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Dizisoft <-> DiZiSoft (DiZiSoft - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:34:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ParadiceBeats07 (contribs; 1/1) scores 86.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 86.6%) on calculated overlap ParadiceBeats07 <-> ParadiceBeats (ParadiceBeats - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:36:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lvmtridas (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap newmedia.ufm.edu - newmedia.ufm.edu; Lvmtridas -> newmedia.ufm.edu (WP:ANI - possible spamming); (Universidad Francisco Marroquín - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:36:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Faireire (contribs; 2/2) scores 47.5% (U->L) & 61.56% (L->U) (ratio: 29.2%) on calculated overlap Faireire <-> rte.ie (Róisín Egenton - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:37:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berkeley City (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 63.15% (P->U) (ratio: 63.1%) on calculated overlap Berkeley City <-> Berkeley City College (Berkeley City College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:37:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berkeley City (contribs; 2/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 63.15% (P->U) (ratio: 63.1%) on calculated overlap Berkeley City <-> Berkeley City College (Berkeley City College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:39:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:EIranica (contribs; 4/6) scores 87.5% (U->L) & 70% (L->U) (ratio: 61.2%) on calculated overlap EIranica <-> iranica.com (Afghanistan - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:39:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ParadiceBeats07 (contribs; 2/2) scores 86.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 86.6%) on calculated overlap ParadiceBeats07 <-> ParadiceBeats (ParadiceBeats - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:42:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berkeley City (contribs; 3/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 63.15% (P->U) (ratio: 63.1%) on calculated overlap Berkeley City <-> Berkeley City College (Berkeley City College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:43:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ParadiceBeats07 (contribs; 3/3) scores 86.66% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 86.6%) on calculated overlap ParadiceBeats07 <-> ParadiceBeats (ParadiceBeats - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:43:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berkeley City (contribs; 4/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 63.15% (P->U) (ratio: 63.1%) on calculated overlap Berkeley City <-> Berkeley City College (Berkeley City College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:44:57, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mafia Expert (contribs; 4/32) scores 45.45% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 45.4%) on calculated overlap Mafia Expert <-> Mafia (Mafia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:46:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:NYScholar (contribs; 1/10) Monitored link - www.webcommentary.com/asp/showarticle.asp?id=carubaa&date=070305 (Alan Caruba - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:47:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cifar (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Cifar <-> CIFAR (CIFAR - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:47:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Angmering (contribs; 1/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 39.13% (P->U) (ratio: 39.1%) on calculated overlap Angmering <-> Angmering railway station (Angmering railway station - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:48:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Angmering (contribs; 2/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 39.13% (P->U) (ratio: 39.1%) on calculated overlap Angmering <-> Angmering railway station (Angmering railway station - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:48:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Berkeley City (contribs; 5/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 63.15% (P->U) (ratio: 63.1%) on calculated overlap Berkeley City <-> Berkeley City College (Berkeley City College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:49:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:EIranica (contribs; 5/7) scores 87.5% (U->L) & 70% (L->U) (ratio: 61.2%) on calculated overlap EIranica <-> iranica.com (Afridi - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:49:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Robsoule (contribs; 2/2) scores 72.62% (U->P) & 58.1% (P->U) (ratio: 42.1%) on calculated overlap Robsoule <-> Debra Soule (Debra Soule - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:49:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Robsoule (contribs; 3/3) scores 65.36% (U->L) & 44.69% (L->U) (ratio: 29.2%) on calculated overlap Robsoule <-> debrasoule.com (Debra Soule - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 18:53:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Robsoule (contribs; 4/4) scores 72.62% (U->P) & 58.1% (P->U) (ratio: 42.1%) on calculated overlap Robsoule <-> Debra Soule (Debra Soule - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:53:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(contribs; 1/1) scores 59.09% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 59%) on calculated overlap<EMAIL_ADDRESS><-> Play Attention (Play Attention - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:54:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:54:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakeoooh (contribs; 1/1) scores 53.2% (U->P) & 47.29% (P->U) (ratio: 25.1%) on calculated overlap Jakeoooh <-> Jake Hansen (Jake Hansen - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:55:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 2/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:56:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 -<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(contribs; 2/2) scores 59.09% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 59%) on calculated overlap<EMAIL_ADDRESS><-> Play Attention (Play Attention - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:56:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 3/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:56:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The-G-Unit-Boss (contribs; 3/121) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap The-G-Unit-Boss <-> G-Unit (G-Unit - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:56:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Abiola99 (contribs; 2/2) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Abiola99 <-> Abiola Abrams (Abiola Abrams - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:57:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 4/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:57:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 5/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:58:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 6/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:58:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 7/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 18:59:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:JFarrell69 (contribs; 1/1) scores 79.99% (U->P) & 72.72% (P->U) (ratio: 58.1%) on calculated overlap JFarrell69 <-> Jack Farrell (Jack Farrell - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:02:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Studies in American Language (contribs; 8/10) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Studies in American Language <-> Studies in American Language (Studies in American Language - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:02:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Missouri9949 (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap Missouri9949 <-> Homeland Missouri (Homeland Missouri - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:04:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:CharlesC (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.instructables.com (Open design - diff - link is blacklisted on shadowbot - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:04:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:JFarrell69 (contribs; 2/2) scores 79.99% (U->P) & 72.72% (P->U) (ratio: 58.1%) on calculated overlap JFarrell69 <-> Jack Farrell (Jack Farrell - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:07:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:JFarrell69 (contribs; 3/3) scores 79.99% (U->P) & 72.72% (P->U) (ratio: 58.1%) on calculated overlap JFarrell69 <-> Jack Farrell (Jack Farrell - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:08:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:TAAGangola (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 55.55% (P->U) (ratio: 55.5%) on calculated overlap TAAGangola <-> TAAG Angola Airlines (TAAG Angola Airlines - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:09:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Abiola99 (contribs; 3/3) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Abiola99 <-> Abiola Abrams (Abiola Abrams - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:10:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:SteveO (contribs; 1/29) scores 75% (U->P) & 38.46% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap SteveO <-> Steve McClaren (Steve McClaren - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:11:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:TheFreeCopt (contribs; 1/1) scores 80.09% (U->L) & 66.66% (L->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap TheFreeCopt <-> freecopts.net (Coptic flag - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:11:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:TheFreeCopt (contribs; 2/2) scores 27.27% (U->L) & 100% (L->U) (ratio: 27.2%) on calculated overlap TheFreeCopt <-> cop (Coptic flag - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:12:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DerHexer (contribs; 1/9) Monitored link - www.tnawrestling.com/fullnews.php?home=594 (Terry Taylor - diff - JB196 case - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:13:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kober (contribs; 1/3) Monitored link - www.iranica.com/articles/v10f5/v10f504b.html (Simon I of Kartli - diff - wt:wpspam iranica.com - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:14:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Axistive (contribs; 1/6) scores 100% (U->L) & 72.72% (L->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Axistive <-> axistive.com (Semantic Web - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:14:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jamie.adkins (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Jamie.adkins <-> Jamie adkins (Jamie adkins - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:16:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jamie.adkins (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Jamie.adkins <-> Jamie adkins (Jamie adkins - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:17:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:TheFreeCopt (contribs; 3/3) scores 36.36% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap TheFreeCopt <-> Copt (Copt - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:17:57, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Abiola99 (contribs; 4/4) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Abiola99 <-> Abiola Abrams (Abiola Abrams - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:21:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lvmtridas (contribs; 3/6) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap newmedia.ufm.edu - newmedia.ufm.edu; Lvmtridas -> newmedia.ufm.edu (WP:ANI - possible spamming); (Ruth Richardson - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:21:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Acpa-collegestudent (contribs; 1/1) scores 77.13% (U->P) & 60.86% (P->U) (ratio: 46.9%) on calculated overlap Acpa-collegestudent <-> College Student Personnel (College Student Personnel - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:21:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Freepic (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->L) & 36.84% (L->U) (ratio: 36.8%) on calculated overlap Freepic <-> freepictureclick.com (Giraffe - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:22:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:SaveKirkland (contribs; 1/1) scores 64.92% (U->P) & 42.1% (P->U) (ratio: 27.3%) on calculated overlap SaveKirkland <-> Kirkland, Washington (Kirkland, Washington - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:22:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Xxdunxx (contribs; 1/1) scores 42.85% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap Xxdunxx <-> Dunia (Dunia - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:23:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:SaveKirkland (contribs; 2/2) scores 66.66% (U->L) & 57.14% (L->U) (ratio: 38%) on calculated overlap SaveKirkland <-> ci.kirkland.wa.us (Kirkland, Washington - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:24:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The-G-Unit-Boss (contribs; 2/122) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap The-G-Unit-Boss <-> G-Unit (G-Unit - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:26:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Totnesmartin (contribs; 1/6) scores 60.93% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 28.1%) on calculated overlap Totnesmartin <-> Martin Hannett (Martin Hannett - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:27:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:InPulse (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap InPulse <-> InPulse (InPulse - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:28:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jstnsmutek (contribs; 1/1) scores 97% (U->P) & 80.83% (P->U) (ratio: 78.4%) on calculated overlap Jstnsmutek <-> JUSTIN SMUTEK (JUSTIN SMUTEK - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:30:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:WeRMad (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap WeRMad <-> WeRMad (WeRMad - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:30:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Acguitarte (contribs; 1/1) scores 89% (U->P) & 63.57% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Acguitarte <-> Andrew Guitarte (Andrew Guitarte - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:31:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BertranddelaTour (contribs; 1/2) scores 76.16% (U->P) & 81.24% (P->U) (ratio: 61.8%) on calculated overlap BertranddelaTour <-> Bertrand de Turre (Bertrand de Turre - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:32:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:InPulse (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap InPulse <-> InPulse (InPulse - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:32:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:InPulse (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap InPulse <-> InPulse (InPulse - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:35:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Faireire (contribs; 2/3) scores 47.5% (U->L) & 61.56% (L->U) (ratio: 29.2%) on calculated overlap Faireire <-> rte.ie (Róisín Egenton - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:36:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:InPulse (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap InPulse <-> InPulse (InPulse - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:37:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:InPulse (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap InPulse <-> InPulse (InPulse - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:37:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:WeRMad (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap WeRMad <-> Wermad (Wermad - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:38:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Acguitarte (contribs; 2/2) scores 89% (U->P) & 63.57% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Acguitarte <-> Andrew Guitarte (Andrew Guitarte - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:40:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Buxtonco (contribs; 1/1) scores 75% (U->P) & 76.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.4%) on calculated overlap Buxtonco <-> Tom buxton (Tom buxton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:40:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Keeani (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Keeani <-> Keeani Lei (Keeani Lei - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:40:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Geometry guy (contribs; 1/2) scores 65.45% (U->P) & 48.94% (P->U) (ratio: 32%) on calculated overlap Geometry guy <-> Symplectic geometry (Symplectic geometry - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:41:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Manipulator (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 37.93% (P->U) (ratio: 37.9%) on calculated overlap Manipulator <-> Manipulator (The Fall of Troy album) (Manipulator (The Fall of Troy album) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:41:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Geometry guy (contribs; 2/3) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 38.7%) on calculated overlap Geometry guy <-> Contact geometry (Contact geometry - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:41:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ken Gallager (contribs; 1/2) Monitored link - www.cosmographica.com/gallery/index_main.html (Don Dixon (artist) - diff - link is blacklisted on shadowbot - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:42:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The-G-Unit-Boss (contribs; 3/123) scores 51.8% (U->P) & 49.71% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap The-G-Unit-Boss <-> G-Unit Records (G-Unit Records - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:42:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The-G-Unit-Boss (contribs; 4/124) scores 51.8% (U->P) & 49.71% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap The-G-Unit-Boss <-> G-Unit Records (G-Unit Records - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:43:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Austin55 (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Austin55 <-> Austin55 (Austin55 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:43:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> Gina Genovese (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:44:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Davidpyansick (contribs; 1/1) scores 92.3% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 92.3%) on calculated overlap Davidpyansick <-> David Yansick (David Yansick - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:45:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Davidpyansick (contribs; 2/2) scores 92.3% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 92.3%) on calculated overlap Davidpyansick <-> David Yansick (David Yansick - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:45:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 1/2) Monitored link - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu/nwda-search/findstyle.aspx?doc=oihohguard.xml&t=i&q=4 (Old Idaho State Penitentiary - diff - wt:wpspam unusual university spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:46:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakeoooh (contribs; 2/2) scores 53.2% (U->P) & 47.29% (P->U) (ratio: 25.1%) on calculated overlap Jakeoooh <-> Jake Hansen (Jake Hansen - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:47:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:WeRMad (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap WeRMad <-> WeRMad (WeRMad - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:48:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 1/113) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:49:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 2/3) Monitored link - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu/nwda-search/findstyle.aspx?doc=oihms714.xml&t=i&q=4 (Gem County, Idaho - diff - wt:wpspam unusual university spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:49:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:WeRMad (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap WeRMad <-> Wermad (Wermad - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:50:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:East718 (contribs; 1/3) Monitored link - www.wrestlingobserver.com/wo/news/headlines/default.asp?aid=9171 (Fedor Emelianenko - diff - jb196 case - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:51:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:WeRMad (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap WeRMad <-> Wermad (Wermad - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:51:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:DiMera1 (contribs; 1/5) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 39.5%) on calculated overlap DiMera1 <-> Stefano DiMera (Stefano DiMera - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:52:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:WeRMad (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap WeRMad <-> WeRMad (WeRMad - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:52:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 3/4) Monitored link - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu/nwda-search/findstyle.aspx?doc=oihms698.xml&t=i&q=4 (Fishing - diff - wt:wpspam unusual university spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:53:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Danjulien (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 47.36% (L->U) (ratio: 47.3%) on calculated overlap Danjulien <-> danjulien.atspace.com (Theo Epstein - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:53:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 2/114) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:54:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anneatcafemom (contribs; 1/1) scores 53.84% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 53.8%) on calculated overlap Anneatcafemom <-> CafeMom (CafeMom - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:54:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:WeRMad (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap WeRMad <-> WeRMad (WeRMad - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:54:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cloejackson (contribs; 1/1) scores 76.89% (U->P) & 63.63% (P->U) (ratio: 48.9%) on calculated overlap Cloejackson <-> Jackson Hole (Jackson Hole - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:54:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Danjulien (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->L) & 47.36% (L->U) (ratio: 47.3%) on calculated overlap Danjulien <-> danjulien.atspace.com (Theo Epstein - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:55:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cloejackson (contribs; 2/2) scores 69.6% (U->P) & 46.66% (P->U) (ratio: 32.4%) on calculated overlap Cloejackson <-> Jackson, Wyoming (Jackson, Wyoming - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:55:43, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fifborn (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Fifborn <-> Fifborn (Fifborn - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:56:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MonctonRad (contribs; 3/115) scores 70% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 70%) on calculated overlap MonctonRad <-> Moncton (Moncton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:57:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Buxtonco (contribs; 2/2) scores 75% (U->P) & 76.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.4%) on calculated overlap Buxtonco <-> Tom buxton (Tom buxton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:57:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chet.marshall (contribs; 1/1) scores 72.13% (U->L) & 47.05% (L->U) (ratio: 33.9%) on calculated overlap Chet.marshall <-> marshall-group.com (Design-build - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:58:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 4/5) Monitored link - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu/nwda-search/findstyle.aspx?doc=oihms698.xml&t=i&q=4 (Crime fiction - diff - wt:wpspam unusual university spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 19:58:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Keeani (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Keeani <-> Keeani Lei (Keeani Lei - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 19:59:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Buxtonco (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->L) & 72.72% (L->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Buxtonco <-> buxtonco.com (Tom buxton - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:00:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Austin55 (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Austin55 <-> Austin55 (Austin55 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:00:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dead rocker society (contribs; 1/1) scores 55.63% (U->P) & 71.63% (P->U) (ratio: 39.8%) on calculated overlap Dead rocker society <-> Dead Rock Stars (Dead Rock Stars - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:01:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> Gina Genovese (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:01:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 5/6) Monitored link - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu/nwda-search/findstyle.aspx?doc=oihms698.xml&t=i&q=4 (Mystery (fiction) - diff - wt:wpspam unusual university spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:03:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 6/7) Monitored link - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu/nwda-search/findstyle.aspx?doc=oihms20.xml&t=i&q=4 (Idaho State Capitol - diff - wt:wpspam unusual university spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:04:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> Gina Genovese (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:04:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/wweppv/nomercy06.html (Marty Garner - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:05:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Keeani (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Keeani <-> Keeani Lei (Keeani Lei - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:05:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> Gina Genovese (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:05:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->L) & 80% (L->U) (ratio: 80%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> ginagenovese.com (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:05:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BallyronanBob (contribs; 1/1) scores 76.92% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 76.9%) on calculated overlap BallyronanBob <-> Ballyronan (Ballyronan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:06:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Keeani (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Keeani <-> Keeani Lei (Keeani Lei - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:07:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BallyronanBob (contribs; 2/2) scores 76.92% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 76.9%) on calculated overlap BallyronanBob <-> Ballyronan (Ballyronan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:07:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Keeani (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Keeani <-> Keeani Lei (Keeani Lei - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:08:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:BallyronanBob (contribs; 3/3) scores 76.92% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 76.9%) on calculated overlap BallyronanBob <-> Ballyronan (Ballyronan - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:08:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> Gina Genovese (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:09:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> Gina Genovese (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:11:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:GinaGenovese (contribs; 8/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap GinaGenovese <-> Gina Genovese (Gina Genovese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:11:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bretsmum (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Bretsmum <-> Brets mum (Brets mum - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:13:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Enercon (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 53.84% (L->U) (ratio: 53.8%) on calculated overlap Enercon <-> enerconind.com (Induction sealing - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:13:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Albany NY (contribs; 1/14) scores 85.72% (U->P) & 55.71% (P->U) (ratio: 47.7%) on calculated overlap Albany NY <-> Albany, New York (Albany, New York - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:15:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Phillimor (contribs; 1/1) scores 92.76% (U->P) & 71.75% (P->U) (ratio: 66.5%) on calculated overlap Phillimor <-> Phillip Moore (Phillip Moore - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:16:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Markphilip1 (contribs; 1/1) scores 73.63% (U->P) & 62.5% (P->U) (ratio: 46%) on calculated overlap Markphilip1 <-> Mark andrew philip (Mark andrew philip - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:18:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fridaynight (contribs; 1/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 52.38% (P->U) (ratio: 52.3%) on calculated overlap Fridaynight <-> The Friday Night Project (The Friday Night Project - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:18:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Miamitom (contribs; 1/19) scores 64.45% (U->P) & 44.69% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Miamitom <-> Miami, Florida (Miami, Florida - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:19:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Miamitom (contribs; 2/20) scores 64.45% (U->P) & 44.69% (P->U) (ratio: 28.8%) on calculated overlap Miamitom <-> Miami, Florida (Miami, Florida - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:19:57, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fridaynight (contribs; 2/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 52.38% (P->U) (ratio: 52.3%) on calculated overlap Fridaynight <-> The Friday Night Project (The Friday Night Project - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:20:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dfrancke (contribs; 1/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 66.6%) on calculated overlap Dfrancke <-> David Francke (David Francke - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:21:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Guitarhero4rocks (contribs; 1/1) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 83.33% (P->U) (ratio: 52%) on calculated overlap Guitarhero4rocks <-> Guitar Hero II (Guitar Hero II - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:21:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bretsmum (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Bretsmum <-> Brets mum (Brets mum - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:22:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fridaynight (contribs; 3/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 52.38% (P->U) (ratio: 52.3%) on calculated overlap Fridaynight <-> The Friday Night Project (The Friday Night Project - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:23:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 7/8) Monitored link - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu/nwda-search/findstyle.aspx?doc=oihms20.xml&t=i&q=4 (Idaho State Capitol - diff - wt:wpspam unusual university spam - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:23:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Buxtonco (contribs; 4/4) scores 75% (U->P) & 76.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.4%) on calculated overlap Buxtonco <-> Tom buxton (Tom buxton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:24:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Buxtonco (contribs; 5/5) scores 75% (U->P) & 76.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.4%) on calculated overlap Buxtonco <-> Tom buxton (Tom buxton - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:24:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:24:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Omazinggrace (contribs; 1/1) scores 91.66% (U->P) & 91.66% (P->U) (ratio: 84%) on calculated overlap Omazinggrace <-> Amazing Grace (Amazing Grace - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:26:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MujerMariachi (contribs; 1/1) scores 61.53% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 61.5%) on calculated overlap MujerMariachi <-> Mariachi (Mariachi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:26:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anselmostefani (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Anselmostefani <-> Anselmo (Anselmo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:27:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tgarrick (contribs; 8/9) scores 100% (R->L) & 100% (L->R) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu - nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu; Tgarrick -> nwda-db.wsulibs.wsu.edu (WT:WPSPAM unusual university spam and Idaho historical); (Idaho State Capitol - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:29:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:TeaDrinker (contribs; 1/4) scores 55.2% (U->P) & 63.87% (P->U) (ratio: 35.2%) on calculated overlap TeaDrinker <-> Taurine (Taurine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:31:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Malcolmxl5 (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->L) & 62.99% (L->U) (ratio: 31.4%) on calculated overlap Malcolmxl5 <-> goal.com (Carlos Tévez - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:32:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Graystreet07 (contribs; 1/1) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Graystreet07 <-> Gray street (Gray street - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:32:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:32:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Graystreet07 (contribs; 2/2) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Graystreet07 <-> Gray street (Gray street - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:36:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kober (contribs; 1/4) Monitored link - www.doingbusiness.org/economyrankings/ (Georgia (country) - diff - - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:37:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Robercik123 (contribs; 1/1) scores 72.72% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Robercik123 <-> Robercik (Robercik - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:38:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Trill74 (contribs; 1/1) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 35.7%) on calculated overlap Trill74 <-> Trill Gatez (Trill Gatez - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:39:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Graystreet07 (contribs; 3/3) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Graystreet07 <-> Gray street (Gray street - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:40:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Murray382 (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 39.9%) on calculated overlap Murray382 <-> Bret murray (Bret murray - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:41:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Graystreet07 (contribs; 4/4) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Graystreet07 <-> Gray street (Gray street - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:42:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Murray382 (contribs; 2/2) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 39.9%) on calculated overlap Murray382 <-> Bret murray (Bret murray - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:42:32, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:42:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Infamoustaco (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Infamoustaco <-> Infamoustaco (Infamoustaco - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:42:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Murray382 (contribs; 3/3) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 39.9%) on calculated overlap Murray382 <-> Bret murray (Bret murray - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:42:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:JalenRussell (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap JalenRussell <-> Jalen Russell (Jalen Russell - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:43:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:43:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Murray382 (contribs; 4/4) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 39.9%) on calculated overlap Murray382 <-> Bret murray (Bret murray - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:43:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anselmostefani (contribs; 2/2) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Anselmostefani <-> Anselmo (Anselmo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:44:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:44:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Infamoustaco (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Infamoustaco <-> Infamoustaco (Infamoustaco - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:44:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anselmostefani (contribs; 3/3) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Anselmostefani <-> Anselmo (Anselmo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:45:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Murray382 (contribs; 5/5) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 39.9%) on calculated overlap Murray382 <-> Bret murray (Bret murray - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:48:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anselmostefani (contribs; 4/4) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Anselmostefani <-> Anselmo (Anselmo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:48:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:PrincessGraceFDN (contribs; 1/1) scores 98.75% (U->P) & 64.78% (P->U) (ratio: 63.9%) on calculated overlap PrincessGraceFDN <-> Princess grace foundation (Princess grace foundation - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:49:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:50:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anselmostefani (contribs; 5/5) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Anselmostefani <-> Anselmo (Anselmo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:50:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:50:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Enercon (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->L) & 53.84% (L->U) (ratio: 53.8%) on calculated overlap Enercon <-> enerconind.com (Corona treatment - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 20:50:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:51:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 1/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:51:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anselmostefani (contribs; 6/6) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Anselmostefani <-> Anselmo (Anselmo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:51:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 2/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:51:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Penrithguy (contribs; 1/5) scores 70% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 37.6%) on calculated overlap Penrithguy <-> Penrith Castle (Penrith Castle - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:51:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Quadell (contribs; 1/4) scores 42.85% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap Quadell <-> Shade (Shade - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:51:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 8/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:52:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Clawson17 (contribs; 1/1) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 41.8%) on calculated overlap Clawson17 <-> Charlie lawson (Charlie lawson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:52:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Cianmc (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 46.1%) on calculated overlap Cianmc <-> Cianmccartney (Cianmccartney - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:52:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Clawson17 (contribs; 2/2) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 41.8%) on calculated overlap Clawson17 <-> Charlie lawson (Charlie lawson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:52:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Calebkeown (contribs; 9/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Calebkeown <-> Caleb Keown (Caleb Keown - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:53:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Pisomby (contribs; 1/4) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap Pisomby <-> Somby (Somby - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:53:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 3/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:54:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Clawson17 (contribs; 3/3) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 41.8%) on calculated overlap Clawson17 <-> Charlie lawson (Charlie lawson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:55:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:56:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anselmostefani (contribs; 7/7) scores 50% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 50%) on calculated overlap Anselmostefani <-> Anselmo (Anselmo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:58:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:59:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:59:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:59:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 20:59:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 4/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:00:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:01:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 8/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:01:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 5/8) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:03:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 6/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:04:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kalaong (contribs; 1/1) scores 51.42% (U->P) & 51.42% (P->U) (ratio: 26.4%) on calculated overlap Kalaong <-> Melange (Melange - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:05:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Palbanes (contribs; 9/9) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Palbanes <-> Phillip albanese (Phillip albanese - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:05:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Nyletak (contribs; 1/1) scores 42.85% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap Nyletak <-> Tyler (Tyler - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:06:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Samgallo (contribs; 1/2) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 62.5%) on calculated overlap Samgallo <-> Gallo (Gallo - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:07:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jakeoooh (contribs; 1/3) scores 53.2% (U->P) & 47.29% (P->U) (ratio: 25.1%) on calculated overlap Jakeoooh <-> Jake Hansen (Jake Hansen - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:10:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Plantontology (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.52% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Plantontology <-> Plant Ontology Consortium (Plant Ontology Consortium - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:11:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Graystreet07 (contribs; 5/5) scores 83.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 83.3%) on calculated overlap Graystreet07 <-> Gray street (Gray street - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:12:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 7/10) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:13:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The brand studio (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The brand studio <-> The Brand Studio (The Brand Studio - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:14:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Garhing (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Garhing <-> Garhing (Garhing - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:15:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Albany NY (contribs; 1/15) scores 85.72% (U->P) & 55.71% (P->U) (ratio: 47.7%) on calculated overlap Albany NY <-> Albany, New York (Albany, New York - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:15:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Worden Sports College (contribs; 1/82) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Worden Sports College <-> Worden Sports College (Worden Sports College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:15:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The brand studio (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap The brand studio <-> The Brand Studio (The Brand Studio - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:16:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Pdxpoledivas (contribs; 1/4) scores 47.74% (U->P) & 56.56% (P->U) (ratio: 27%) on calculated overlap Pdxpoledivas <-> Pole dance (Pole dance - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:16:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Worden Sports College (contribs; 2/83) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Worden Sports College <-> Worden Sports College (Worden Sports College - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:16:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Plantontology (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.52% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Plantontology <-> Plant Ontology Consortium (Plant Ontology Consortium - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:16:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 1/58) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:19:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 2/59) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:20:46, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 3/60) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:22:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 8/11) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:22:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.global-itv.com (IPTV - diff - link is blacklisted on shadowbot - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:22:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bdve (contribs; 1/60) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/information/deathmatches.html (List of professional wrestling match types - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:24:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Southwestmusic (contribs; 1/4) scores 86.78% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.8%) on calculated overlap Southwestmusic <-> Southwest chamber music (Southwest chamber music - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:26:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 4/61) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:27:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Darryl kempster (contribs; 9/12) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Darryl kempster <-> Darryl Kempster (Darryl Kempster - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:27:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 5/62) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:28:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 6/63) scores 100% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 54.5%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School (Libertyville High School - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:28:27, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Plantontology (contribs; 3/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.52% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Plantontology <-> Plant Ontology Consortium (Plant Ontology Consortium - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:28:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 7/64) scores 100% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 54.5%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School (Libertyville High School - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:28:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 8/65) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:29:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Grandenergy (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 73.33% (P->U) (ratio: 73.3%) on calculated overlap Grandenergy <-> Grand Energy, Inc. (Grand Energy, Inc. - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:29:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:29:42, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Plantontology (contribs; 4/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.52% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Plantontology <-> Plant Ontology Consortium (Plant Ontology Consortium - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:29:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 2/2) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:30:02, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 3/3) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:31:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Grandenergy (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Grandenergy <-> Grand Energy (Grand Energy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:32:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 4/4) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:32:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 5/5) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:32:22, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Southwestmusic (contribs; 2/5) scores 86.78% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.8%) on calculated overlap Southwestmusic <-> Southwest chamber music (Southwest chamber music - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:32:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Southwestmusic (contribs; 3/6) scores 48.57% (U->L) & 55.08% (L->U) (ratio: 26.7%) on calculated overlap Southwestmusic <-> swmusic.org (Southwest chamber music - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:33:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 9/66) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:33:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 10/67) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:33:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Humongous (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 40.9% (P->U) (ratio: 40.9%) on calculated overlap Humongous <-> Humongous (game developer) (Humongous (game developer) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:33:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ColWilliam (contribs; 1/22) scores 78.09% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 45.5%) on calculated overlap ColWilliam <-> William Stacy (William Stacy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:33:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Humongous (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 40.9% (P->U) (ratio: 40.9%) on calculated overlap Humongous <-> Humongous (game developer) (Humongous (game developer) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:34:09, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stake666 (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stake666 <-> Stake666 (Stake666 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:34:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 11/68) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:35:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Stake666 (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Stake666 <-> Stake666 (Stake666 - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:35:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 12/69) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:37:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:MattRWilsontheGreat (contribs; 1/1) scores 50.52% (U->P) & 53.83% (P->U) (ratio: 27.1%) on calculated overlap MattRWilsontheGreat <-> Matthew Wilson (Matthew Wilson - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:38:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 13/70) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:38:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 6/6) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:38:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 7/7) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:39:29, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 8/8) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:39:31, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Plantontology (contribs; 5/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.52% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Plantontology <-> Plant Ontology Consortium (Plant Ontology Consortium - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:40:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Plantontology (contribs; 6/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.52% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Plantontology <-> Plant Ontology Consortium (Plant Ontology Consortium - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:41:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Scorpion0422 (contribs; 1/9) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/profiles/y/yokozuna.html (Rodney Anoa'i - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:41:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Plantontology (contribs; 7/7) scores 100% (U->P) & 56.52% (P->U) (ratio: 56.5%) on calculated overlap Plantontology <-> Plant Ontology Consortium (Plant Ontology Consortium - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:42:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Zolbe (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 35.71% (P->U) (ratio: 35.7%) on calculated overlap Zolbe <-> Christian Zolbe (Christian Zolbe - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:42:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 9/9) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:43:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 10/10) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:43:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ColWilliam (contribs; 2/23) scores 78.09% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 45.5%) on calculated overlap ColWilliam <-> William Stacy (William Stacy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:44:52, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Marcus Berkmann (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Marcus Berkmann <-> Marcus Berkmann (Marcus Berkmann - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:45:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chikamaka (contribs; 1/1) scores 63.26% (U->P) & 52.06% (P->U) (ratio: 32.9%) on calculated overlap Chikamaka <-> Chickamauga Wars (Chickamauga Wars - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:46:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fatbeats (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.33% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Fatbeats <-> Fat Beats Records (Fat Beats Records - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:46:39, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Chikamaka (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->L) & 56.25% (L->U) (ratio: 56.2%) on calculated overlap Chikamaka <-> chikamaka-cwy.org (Chickamauga Wars - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:46:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Markshankairey (contribs; 1/1) scores 64.28% (U->P) & 90% (P->U) (ratio: 57.8%) on calculated overlap Markshankairey <-> Mark airey (Mark airey - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:48:10, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 11/11) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:48:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Markshankairey (contribs; 2/2) scores 64.28% (U->P) & 90% (P->U) (ratio: 57.8%) on calculated overlap Markshankairey <-> Mark airey (Mark airey - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:50:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 12/12) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:50:49, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 13/13) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:52:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Caracas 2000 (contribs; 1/41) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 63.6%) on calculated overlap Caracas 2000 <-> Caracas (Caracas - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:52:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mccrackent (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/news/detailedbenoittimeline\|title=benoit’s (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:52:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mccrackent (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/news/benoitpressrelease\|title=wwe® (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:52:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ecotter 21 (contribs; 14/14) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 54.54% (P->U) (ratio: 36.3%) on calculated overlap Ecotter 21 <-> Aaron Cotter (Aaron Cotter - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:54:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fallinboy (contribs; 1/11) scores 66.99% (U->P) & 67% (P->U) (ratio: 44.8%) on calculated overlap Fallinboy <-> Fall Out Boy (Fall Out Boy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:55:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fallinboy (contribs; 2/12) scores 66.99% (U->P) & 67% (P->U) (ratio: 44.8%) on calculated overlap Fallinboy <-> Fall Out Boy (Fall Out Boy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:56:20, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Fallinboy (contribs; 3/13) scores 66.99% (U->P) & 67% (P->U) (ratio: 44.8%) on calculated overlap Fallinboy <-> Fall Out Boy (Fall Out Boy - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:56:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Southwestmusic (contribs; 4/7) scores 86.78% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 57.8%) on calculated overlap Southwestmusic <-> Southwest chamber music (Southwest chamber music - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:57:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mbonney30b (contribs; 1/1) scores 70% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 37.6%) on calculated overlap Mbonney30b <-> Malcolm bonney (Malcolm bonney - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 21:57:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.criterion.com/asp/release.asp?id=400 (Permanent Vacation (film) - diff - wt:wpspam criterion.com / wikiproject films - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:59:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mccrackent (contribs; 3/3) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/news/benoitdead\|title=chris (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:59:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:KianuXAN (contribs; 1/1) scores 62.5% (U->L) & 62.5% (L->U) (ratio: 39%) on calculated overlap KianuXAN <-> kianu.org (Chi Alpha Nu - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 21:59:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:KianuXAN (contribs; 2/2) scores 62.5% (U->L) & 62.5% (L->U) (ratio: 39%) on calculated overlap KianuXAN <-> kianu.org (Chi Alpha Nu - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:01:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Totnesmartin (contribs; 1/7) scores 60.93% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 28.1%) on calculated overlap Totnesmartin <-> Martin Hannett (Martin Hannett - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:02:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Banguedenio (contribs; 1/1) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 37.1%) on calculated overlap Banguedenio <-> Bangued, Abra (Bangued, Abra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:02:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Websesame (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 69.23% (L->U) (ratio: 69.2%) on calculated overlap Websesame <-> websesame.co.uk (Drupal - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:02:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Totnesmartin (contribs; 2/8) scores 60.93% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 28.1%) on calculated overlap Totnesmartin <-> Martin Hannett (Martin Hannett - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:03:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Banguedenio (contribs; 2/2) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 37.1%) on calculated overlap Banguedenio <-> Bangued, Abra (Bangued, Abra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:03:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Totnesmartin (contribs; 3/9) scores 60.93% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 28.1%) on calculated overlap Totnesmartin <-> Martin Hannett (Martin Hannett - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:05:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ishwarananda (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->P) & 72.9% (P->U) (ratio: 36.4%) on calculated overlap Ishwarananda <-> Ishana (Ishana - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:05:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ishwarananda (contribs; 2/2) scores 50% (U->P) & 72.9% (P->U) (ratio: 36.4%) on calculated overlap Ishwarananda <-> Ishana (Ishana - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:06:30, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Totnesmartin (contribs; 4/10) scores 54.92% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 25.3%) on calculated overlap Totnesmartin <-> Martin Rushent (Martin Rushent - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:07:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Ishwarananda (contribs; 3/3) scores 50% (U->P) & 72.9% (P->U) (ratio: 36.4%) on calculated overlap Ishwarananda <-> Ishana (Ishana - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:08:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Tobias-dahle (contribs; 1/1) scores 57.4% (U->P) & 52.5% (P->U) (ratio: 30.1%) on calculated overlap Tobias-dahle <-> Tobias Storruste Dahle (Tobias Storruste Dahle - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:08:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Biznow (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Biznow <-> Biznow (Biznow - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:08:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Banguedenio (contribs; 3/3) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 37.1%) on calculated overlap Banguedenio <-> Bangued, Abra (Bangued, Abra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:09:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Banguedenio (contribs; 4/4) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 37.1%) on calculated overlap Banguedenio <-> Bangued, Abra (Bangued, Abra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:09:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Drinkaddict (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->L) & 78.57% (L->U) (ratio: 78.5%) on calculated overlap Drinkaddict <-> drinkaddict.com (Energy drink - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:09:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Davegess (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->L) & 72.72% (L->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Davegess <-> davegess.com (Buell Motorcycle Company - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:10:07, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Trusilver (contribs; 1/8) scores 67.28% (U->L) & 40% (L->U) (ratio: 26.9%) on calculated overlap Trusilver <-> silver-coins.org (Coin - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:10:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Davegess (contribs; 2/4) scores 100% (U->L) & 72.72% (L->U) (ratio: 72.7%) on calculated overlap Davegess <-> davegess.com (Buell Motorcycle Company - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:10:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Eurocopter tigre (contribs; 1/4) scores 71.04% (U->P) & 56.08% (P->U) (ratio: 39.8%) on calculated overlap Eurocopter tigre <-> Eurocopter Super Puma (Eurocopter Super Puma - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:14:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Banguedenio (contribs; 5/5) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 37.1%) on calculated overlap Banguedenio <-> Bangued, Abra (Bangued, Abra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:14:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Banguedenio (contribs; 6/6) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 37.1%) on calculated overlap Banguedenio <-> Bangued, Abra (Bangued, Abra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:16:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Eurocopter tigre (contribs; 2/5) scores 75.41% (U->P) & 70.7% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Eurocopter tigre <-> Eurocopter Cougar (Eurocopter Cougar - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:17:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Eurocopter tigre (contribs; 3/6) scores 75.41% (U->P) & 70.7% (P->U) (ratio: 53.3%) on calculated overlap Eurocopter tigre <-> Eurocopter Cougar (Eurocopter Cougar - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:17:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Banguedenio (contribs; 7/7) scores 63.63% (U->P) & 58.33% (P->U) (ratio: 37.1%) on calculated overlap Banguedenio <-> Bangued, Abra (Bangued, Abra - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:18:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mccrackent (contribs; 4/4) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/news/benoitpressrelease\|title=wwe® (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:19:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Eurocopter tigre (contribs; 4/7) scores 71.04% (U->P) & 62.68% (P->U) (ratio: 44.5%) on calculated overlap Eurocopter tigre <-> Eurocopter Dauphin (Eurocopter Dauphin - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:20:40, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anotherstardust (contribs; 1/1) scores 58.19% (U->L) & 66.66% (L->U) (ratio: 38.7%) on calculated overlap Anotherstardust <-> stardust.me.uk (Dylan Timmins - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:22:34, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Iowahwyman (contribs; 1/5) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Iowahwyman <-> Iowa (Iowa - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:24:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Anotherstardust (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - stardust.iphorum.com/index.php (Stingray Timmins - diff - link is blacklisted on shadowbot - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:25:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kris Classic (contribs; 1/26) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/superstars/halloffame/theironsheik/bio/ (Iron Sheik - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:25:04, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kris Classic (contribs; 2/27) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/wweppv/wrestlemaniax-7.html (Iron Sheik - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:27:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Robert Abbott (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Robert Abbott <-> Robert Abbott (Robert Abbott - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:27:15, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Iowahwyman (contribs; 2/6) scores 40% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Iowahwyman <-> Iowa (Iowa - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:27:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Machineuk (contribs; 1/1) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 63.63% (P->U) (ratio: 49.4%) on calculated overlap Machineuk <-> Machine band (Machine band - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:28:06, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Rhoxton (contribs; 1/1) scores 77.14% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 30.8%) on calculated overlap Rhoxton <-> Hoxton Financial (Hoxton Financial - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:31:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Joshua Bronaugh (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Joshua Bronaugh <-> Joshua bronaugh (Joshua bronaugh - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:31:37, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kris Classic (contribs; 3/28) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/profiles/i/iron-sheik.html (Iron Sheik - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:31:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Machineuk (contribs; 2/2) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 63.63% (P->U) (ratio: 49.4%) on calculated overlap Machineuk <-> Machine band (Machine band - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:32:14, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kris Classic (contribs; 4/29) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/nwa/1980.html (Iron Sheik - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:32:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Abiola99 (contribs; 1/5) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Abiola99 <-> Abiola Abrams (Abiola Abrams - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:33:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Davies1991 (contribs; 1/2) scores 60% (U->P) & 66.66% (P->U) (ratio: 39.9%) on calculated overlap Davies1991 <-> Guy Davies (Guy Davies - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:33:51, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boguslavmandzyuk (contribs; 1/1) scores 53.69% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 32.9%) on calculated overlap Boguslavmandzyuk <-> Vitaly Mandzyuk (Vitaly Mandzyuk - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:34:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boguslavmandzyuk (contribs; 2/2) scores 53.69% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 32.9%) on calculated overlap Boguslavmandzyuk <-> Vitaly Mandzyuk (Vitaly Mandzyuk - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:34:41, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boguslavmandzyuk (contribs; 3/3) scores 53.69% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 32.9%) on calculated overlap Boguslavmandzyuk <-> Vitaly Mandzyuk (Vitaly Mandzyuk - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:35:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valley Car Magazine (contribs; 1/1) scores 70.58% (U->L) & 80% (L->U) (ratio: 56.4%) on calculated overlap Valley Car Magazine <-> valleycarmag.com (Rio Grande Valley - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:36:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kris Classic (contribs; 5/30) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/wwc/1980.html (Iron Sheik - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:36:16, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Kris Classic (contribs; 6/31) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/wccw.html (Iron Sheik - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:36:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boguslavmandzyuk (contribs; 4/4) scores 53.69% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 32.9%) on calculated overlap Boguslavmandzyuk <-> Vitaly Mandzyuk (Vitaly Mandzyuk - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:37:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ExtraDry (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/inside/news/benoitdead\|title=chris (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:37:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:ExtraDry (contribs; 2/2) Monitored link - www.wwe.com/superstars/smackdown/chrisbenoit/bio/ (Chris Benoit - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:37:26, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Boguslavmandzyuk (contribs; 5/5) scores 53.69% (U->P) & 61.36% (P->U) (ratio: 32.9%) on calculated overlap Boguslavmandzyuk <-> Vitaly Mandzyuk (Vitaly Mandzyuk - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:38:00, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Martinstever (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.boardgamegeek.com/publisher/10 (Mayfair Games - diff - wt:wpspam boardgamegeek.com - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 22:38:33, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 1/71) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:39:13, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Abiola99 (contribs; 2/6) scores 75% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 37.5%) on calculated overlap Abiola99 <-> Abiola Abrams (Abiola Abrams - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:40:03, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:LFT - Lifestyle Fashion Terminal (contribs; 1/1) scores 85.71% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 85.7%) on calculated overlap LFT - Lifestyle Fashion Terminal <-> Lifestyle Fashion Terminal (Lifestyle Fashion Terminal - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:42:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Valley Car Magazine (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Valley Car Magazine <-> Valley Car Magazine (Valley Car Magazine - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:44:56, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Patofnavar (contribs; 1/1) scores 57.29% (U->P) & 55.55% (P->U) (ratio: 31.8%) on calculated overlap Patofnavar <-> Navar (band) (Navar (band) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:46:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Estonia54 (contribs; 1/1) scores 77.77% (U->P) & 46.66% (P->U) (ratio: 36.2%) on calculated overlap Estonia54 <-> Estonia passport (Estonia passport - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:48:17, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Vincentf3 (contribs; 1/1) scores 88.88% (U->P) & 61.53% (P->U) (ratio: 54.6%) on calculated overlap Vincentf3 <-> Vincent Flores (Vincent Flores - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:48:18, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Libertyville (contribs; 2/72) scores 100% (U->P) & 40% (P->U) (ratio: 40%) on calculated overlap Libertyville <-> Libertyville High School Football (Libertyville High School Football - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:50:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Humongous (contribs; 1/3) scores 100% (U->P) & 40.9% (P->U) (ratio: 40.9%) on calculated overlap Humongous <-> Humongous (game developer) (Humongous (game developer) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 22:57:01, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Borisweb (contribs; 1/1) scores 62.5% (U->P) & 50% (P->U) (ratio: 31.2%) on calculated overlap Borisweb <-> Boris kisin (Boris kisin - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:00:45, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Leramoe (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Leramoe <-> LeraMoe (LeraMoe - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:00:48, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Zealley (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 53.8%) on calculated overlap Zealley <-> Andrew Zealley (Andrew Zealley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:00:53, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Riffraffmd (contribs; 1/1) scores 80% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 80%) on calculated overlap Riffraffmd <-> Riff Raff (Riff Raff - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:00:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Mamutsoftware (contribs; 1/1) scores 38.46% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 38.4%) on calculated overlap Mamutsoftware <-> Mamut (Mamut - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:00:58, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Humongous (contribs; 2/4) scores 100% (U->P) & 40.9% (P->U) (ratio: 40.9%) on calculated overlap Humongous <-> Humongous (game developer) (Humongous (game developer) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:02:28, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:RDGatchel (contribs; 1/1) scores 77.77% (U->L) & 53.84% (L->U) (ratio: 41.8%) on calculated overlap RDGatchel <-> bobgatchel.com (Cecil County, Maryland - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 23:02:47, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Riffraffmd (contribs; 2/2) scores 80% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 80%) on calculated overlap Riffraffmd <-> Riff Raff (Riff Raff - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:03:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Warrush (contribs; 1/4) scores 42.85% (U->P) & 60% (P->U) (ratio: 25.7%) on calculated overlap Warrush <-> Wario (Wario - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:04:11, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Zealley (contribs; 2/2) scores 100% (U->P) & 53.84% (P->U) (ratio: 53.8%) on calculated overlap Zealley <-> Andrew Zealley (Andrew Zealley - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:04:25, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:RDGatchel (contribs; 2/2) scores 77.77% (U->L) & 53.84% (L->U) (ratio: 41.8%) on calculated overlap RDGatchel <-> bobgatchel.com (Elkton, Maryland - diff - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 23:04:36, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Humongous (contribs; 3/5) scores 100% (U->P) & 40.9% (P->U) (ratio: 40.9%) on calculated overlap Humongous <-> Humongous (game developer) (Humongous (game developer) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:08:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Jackcocoon (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.culturebully.com/archives/3117 http (Earth Intruders - diff - wt:wpspam culturebully.com - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 23:12:12, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Humongous (contribs; 4/6) scores 100% (U->P) & 40.9% (P->U) (ratio: 40.9%) on calculated overlap Humongous <-> Humongous (game developer) (Humongous (game developer) - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:12:24, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Eltorokillah (contribs; 1/1) scores 54.84% (U->P) & 52.23% (P->U) (ratio: 28.6%) on calculated overlap Eltorokillah <-> El Toro Handrail (El Toro Handrail - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:14:50, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lowdeno25 (contribs; 1/1) scores 66.66% (U->P) & 46.15% (P->U) (ratio: 30.7%) on calculated overlap Lowdeno25 <-> Lowden guitars (Lowden guitars - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:14:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Bambinn (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - libraries.theeuropeanlibrary.org/iceland/treasures_en.xml (Iceland - diff - subdomain of theeuropeanlibrary - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 23:20:44, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Dottiewest1fan (contribs; 1/28) scores 71.42% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 71.4%) on calculated overlap Dottiewest1fan <-> Dottie West (Dottie West - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:21:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Johnrochie (contribs; 1/1) scores 58.1% (U->P) & 58.1% (P->U) (ratio: 33.7%) on calculated overlap Johnrochie <-> JRoche.com (JRoche.com - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:21:38, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Warrush (contribs; 2/5) scores 64.91% (U->P) & 56.09% (P->U) (ratio: 36.4%) on calculated overlap Warrush <-> War on Drugs (War on Drugs - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:25:05, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Master of the backbreaker (contribs; 1/1) scores 44% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 44%) on calculated overlap The Master of the backbreaker <-> Backbreaker (Backbreaker - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:25:54, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Master of the backbreaker (contribs; 2/2) scores 44% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 44%) on calculated overlap The Master of the backbreaker <-> Backbreaker (Backbreaker - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:26:21, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:The Master of the backbreaker (contribs; 3/3) scores 44% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 44%) on calculated overlap The Master of the backbreaker <-> Backbreaker (Backbreaker - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:27:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Lekociv (contribs; 1/1) scores 54.72% (U->P) & 46.83% (P->U) (ratio: 25.6%) on calculated overlap Lekociv <-> Edina Lekovic (Edina Lekovic - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:33:59, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.fanfiction.net/s/3193103/1/ (Alternative universe (fan fiction) - diff - wt:wpspam fanfiction.net - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 23:37:08, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Gateshater (contribs; 1/1) scores 50% (U->P) & 62.84% (P->U) (ratio: 31.4%) on calculated overlap Gateshater <-> Josh gates (Josh gates - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:41:19, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:<IP_ADDRESS> (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/profiles/k/kenny-dykstra.html\|title (Ken Doane - diff - long_term_abuse/jb196 - COIBot UserReport - COIBot LinkReport - Link report - Linksearch - Spamsearch) * 23:44:35, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:TobiAkatsuki (contribs; 1/1) scores 33.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap TobiAkatsuki <-> Tobi (Tobi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:44:55, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Thetigerman9 (contribs; 1/1) scores 57.5% (U->P) & 68.99% (P->U) (ratio: 39.6%) on calculated overlap Thetigerman9 <-> White tiger (White tiger - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:45:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:TobiAkatsuki (contribs; 2/2) scores 33.33% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 33.3%) on calculated overlap TobiAkatsuki <-> Tobi (Tobi - diff - COIBot UserReport) * 23:45:23, Thu Jun 28, 2007 - user:Johnpallett (contribs; 1/1) scores 80.09% (U->P) & 80.09% (P->U) (ratio: 64.1%) on calculated overlap Johnpallett <-> Owen Pallett (Owen Pallett - diff - COIBot UserReport)	WIKI
Congressional Black Caucus has a duty to meet with President Trump \| TheHill The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), which bills itself as the “conscience of the Congress,” is one of the most powerful caucuses in Congress. While many will differ on precisely what parameters translate into “powerful,” none can deny a clear element of clout and visibility the CBC has on Capitol Hill. Members of the caucus have histories of activism unparalleled by other legislators and, for nearly 50 years, they have taken unpopular stances, not only for interests of African Americans, but for the good of the entire country. Within the 115th Congress, the CBC has a historic membership of 49 U.S. representatives and two U.S. senators. Collectively, they represent 78 million Americans comprising 24 percent of the total U.S. population. About 17 million of those constituents are African Americans who makes up 41 percent of the total U.S. African American population. In addition, the CBC represents almost a fourth of the House Democratic Caucus. The CBC was founded in 1971, and since that time it has pushed into the mainstream by earning seniority and serving as chairpersons or ranking members of key congressional committees, with subsequent re-elections ensured by majority-minority districts. Yet, while their voices and antics have been seemingly effective throughout the years, their efficacy in furthering the substantive and enduring legislative goals of their largely African American constituency has been questioned. This month, according to Politico, four sources close to the Congressional Black Caucus have said the group feels that President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump pushes back on recent polling data, says internal numbers are 'strongest we've had so far' Illinois state lawmaker apologizes for photos depicting mock assassination of Trump Scaramucci assembling team of former Cabinet members to speak out against Trump MORE has done nothing to help advance their goals since the executive board met with him back in March. Therefore, they don’t believe meeting with him now would amount to much more than a photo-op for the president. This rationale is at best questionable. First, did the Congressional Black Caucus earnestly expect President Trump to advance its goals? Second, what led the officers of the CBC to believe that Trump would take their causes seriously? Third, is Trump’s demeanor sufficient reason to decline meeting with the president of the Unites States? I suppose one can reasonably understand the CBC’s position for not meeting with President Trump, given his “skinny” budget proposal cuts to many programs championed by CBC members and their constituents, his opposition to ObamaCare and to many more programs, and his penchant for bending the truth. However, this still leaves me with my first point. In 1971, President Richard Nixon refused to meet with the CBC and, upset by that refusal, the caucus publicly boycotted the State of the Union address that year. That action subsequently led to Nixon agreeing to meet with the caucus. Since that time, the CBC has masterfully used such tactics to gain national attention, obtain high level meetings, and raise the conscience of the country. Yet, this current refusal to continue to meet with President Trump is perplexing, as members of the caucus must resolve critical issues, including imbalances in the criminal justice system, discriminatory voter suppression, affordable healthcare and elimination of racial health disparities, promotion of U.S. foreign policy initiatives in Africa and other countries, expansion of access to pre-kindergarten through post-secondary education, and increasing support for historically black colleges and universities. The question thus begs, what then, is the strategy in this Trump era? The CBC must continue to be engaged, above all. It certainly has dealt with Republican presidents before, yet this administration seems to present some impasse. Many liberals and some African Americans will suggest that another meeting with the president is futile. But imagine if Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and other civil rights leaders had refused to meet with President Johnson for a second, third, and fourth time? Rep. Cedric RichmondCedric Levon RichmondHouse Democrat calls for gun control: Cities can ban plastic straws but 'we can't ban assault weapons?' Embattled Juul seeks allies in Washington Democratic lawmakers support Bustos after DCCC resignations MORE (D-La.), chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, recently wrote a letter to President Trump, saying, “The CBC, and the millions of people we represent, have a lot to lose under your administration.” Richmond continued, “I fail to see how a social gathering would benefit the policies we advocate for.” But in my view, the caucus needs a gathering with Trump to discuss, debate, and vocalize its issues. Dealing with this White House and administration may be a challenge, but it is no excuse not to meet. Dare I say, it is their duty to meet with the president and to continue the good fight for the districts and communities they represent because Rep. Richmond is correct — the millions of people they represent have a lot to lose. Working with this White House is not easy, but not engaging on behalf of fragile communities is more painful to the communities that the Congressional Black Caucus represents. Perhaps this is a strategy to give up Beltway politics and endorse a more grassroots progressive activism. But I doubt it, and it won’t work. Cynicism aside, the Congressional Black Caucus is essential. Its voice in the legislative process is critical, and many of its constituents living on the margins find solace in that voice. As former Rep. William Clay Sr. (D-Mo.) declared when the CBC was founded, “Black people have no permanent friends, no permanent enemies...just permanent interests.” Even in this Trump era, the caucus must live by this edict. Quardricos Bernard Driskell is a healthcare lobbyist with 10 years of government relations experience. He is an adjunct professor of religion and politics at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @Q_Driskell4. The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill. View the discussion thread. Contributor's Signup The Hill 1625 K Street, NW Suite 900 Washington DC 20006 \| 202-628-8500 tel \| 202-628-8503 fax The contents of this site are ©2019 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Godaan Godaan (literally "Gift of Cow") is the most famous work by Indian writer Premchand. Dialogues from this book are widely quoted. Quotes * What the world calls sorrow is really joy for the poet. * Only those people write who have some sorrow or some feelings in their hearts. Why would people who are neck deep in comforts and luxuries write at all? * Everything is forgiven when you win. But if you lose, the shame of loss has to be only drunk to be forgotten.	WIKI
Intermittent Fasting: A Beginner's Guide You’ve probably heard of Intermittent Fasting by now. It’s a very popular health trend all thanks to studies and testimonials swearing by its health benefits like weight loss and mental clarity. Intermittent Fasting is not a diet, it’s an eating pattern. Its most popular method is the 16:8, which means that you stay fasted for 16h and eat under the remaining 8h limit. If you have lunch at 12 pm, then you should finish dinner already by 8 pm to repeat the cycle. But wait, wasn’t breakfast ‘the most important meal of the day’? Well, that is not really a rule. But if that’s a must for you, it’s always possible to organize your meals within the eating period. Now that you might already be somewhat familiar with intermittent fasting and its benefits on health. Let me ask you: Do you know how to do it the right way? Or if it's ok to fast if you have diabetes? Can pregnant women fast? In this article, I'm going to answer common questions about Intermittent Fasting and some basic info you must know before starting to implement fasting in your diet. So, let's talk about it! First of all: what does Intermittent Fasting mean? Fasting is the postponement of food intake to give the digestive system and body, in general, a rest. When you're not eating, you are intermittently fasting. Although it sounds strange, every day you are practising fasting: from supper to breakfast. It's easy because you are sleeping, except if you dream about food... 😅 What happens during a fast? When you are not eating, the body runs out of glucose in the bloodstream, our primary source of fuel, and it begins to use the glycogen stored in the liver. Then, insulin levels start to fall. This signals the body that is time to start burning stored energy because there's no more to burn from food. This is why intermittent fasting can be an interesting strategy (always under medical control!) for people with insulin resistance , type 2 diabetes or obesity Then, when your body has used up all the glucose, it starts using stored fat as fuel. In other words, it switches from working with "sugar" to working with fat and gradually empties the fat deposits in the body. It's not easy for the body to switch from sugar-burning to a fat-burning state, so you may want to try fasting with a keto diet to become the master of the fat burners. To summarise, intermittent fasting allows your body to run on your stored energy. That is why fasting is a great tool for weight loss as well. But we're gonna get to that. What are the benefits of intermittent fasting? the benefits of intermittent fasting beginners guide These are some of the benefits of fasting: • Weight loss: some studies show an improvement in body composition and health markers, like this one. It shows that fasting can reduce body weight and body fat. • Insulin resistance: If you have problems managing carbohydrates because your pancreas can’t work properly, you must know that IF can improve insulin resistance and other health markers. You can read this study here on where the male participants improved their insulin levels, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure and stress level after 5 weeks on Early Time-Restricted Feeding. • Lipid profile: How are your cholesterol levels? What about your triglycerides? Did you know that intermittent fasting can help you with your dyslipidemia? This study shows an improvement on the lipid profile of obese male and woman by reducing total cholesterol, LDL and triglycerides and raising HDL levels (also known as “good cholesterol”). • Cancer: In the last years, the number of studies on cancer and intermittent fasting has increased a lot. Good news for us. It can be a good strategy to prevent some types of cancer, like breast cancer and also is a promising strategy for patients on chemotherapy as a tool to decrease toxicity and increase the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. The most common intermittent fasting strategies • 12/12 That means 12 hours of fasting and 12 hours of eating. For example, if you have dinner at 8 pm (ideally) and go to bed at 11 pm, then, next day at 8 am you would break this fast by eating something before going to work or right there. This is the minimum rest we should give our bodies regularly (preferably daily), but in some countries, there's a cultural habit of eating dinner very late and having breakfast very early before going to work. This is not good for your circadian rhythms and probably you won't be able to rest well. • 16/8 That means 16 hours of fasting and 8 hours of eating. With this type of fasting, you can begin to see results in terms of the body's use of insulin and fat loss. In those 8 hours you have to eat, you can choose to make two big meals or three lighter ones depending on our preferences. How can you start practising this type of fasting? By having dinner around 9 pm and having a good lunch at around 1 pm. This system is perfect if you work a split shift and have little time at midday to eat or for if you usually wake up with no appetite. The 16/8 fast can be done several days a week! These two fasting strategies ( 12:12 and 16:8 ) are the most common and easy to carry out. However, there are others which include fasting windows of 20h, 24h or even several days. These require a little more adaptation and I do not recommend trying them out without experience in fasting or professional accompaniment. Tips to start Intermittent Fasting The easiest way to start fasting is by delaying the first food intake (breakfast) and wait, for example, until lunchtime. Some people prefer not to have dinner and to have a hearty breakfast. There are different ways to do this and there is none better than another, but it depends on your individual preferences and needs. Fasting is one more nutritional strategy if you want to lose weight and improve some health aspects, but not the only one. If you're a healthy adult, you can enjoy its benefits no matter the diet you are following. However, not everyone has the same tolerance for fasting. So here it is my advice: experiment different fasting formulas by yourself and decide which one works better for you. You can start gradually, perhaps with a 12-hour fast and then increase it as you go. You may feel hungry and even have a headache or feel a bit weak the first time you fast. This can happen. But listen to your body. If you feel like this persistently, perhaps it is best to start with a lower window and increase it over time. Just remember to stay hydrated and break your fast with a nourishing meal, not immediately binge after your fasting period ends. Can you do any physical activity while fasting? Yes. But depending on your goals, this may not be the best option. If you do a light activity and feel fine, go ahead. You'll get used to it and will be able to do more and more vigorous activities. Remember: fasting is a tool to improve your health, but it does not depend on just one factor. First, you should focus on improving your eating and lifestyle habits, and then you can try extra nutritional strategies to optimise your well-being. Oh! Almost forgot another very important reminder: don't compare yourself to others. You do you! What can you drink or eat during a fast? intermittent fasting beginners guide what can I drink while fasted Can I drink coffee when I'm intermittent fasting? Does bulletproof coffee break my fast? For sure that during a fast you must drink in order to not be dehydrated. In general, drinking non-caloric drinks won’t break your fast, but you must be careful choosing the best options for you: diet-soda is not a good idea. So, focus on drinking water, tea or black coffee (without milk). If you are on a long fast, it would be interesting to add stock or broth - don't forget your electrolytes! Side note: This is a highly debated topic. That's why we asked Dietitian Noor Struik from The Nourishing State what's her take on what does and what doesn't break a fast. In short, she adds it depends on your goal with fasting. If your goal is weight loss, you can drink a bulletproof coffee with butter or MCT in the morning while fasting. If you're in doubt, you can stick to your regular black coffee, water or tea, or contact an experienced dietitian or physician that can guide you through the process of intermittent fasting depending on your needs. Is fasting safe for everyone? Fasting shouldn't be a problem if you are in good shape but, in some cases, fasting can be hard to follow or even dangerous. Pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding should not practice fasting as their nutritional needs are higher than ever. One of the things that can come with fasting is calorie restriction. That means when you are eating fewer calories than the ones you need in a day. When you are pregnant or breastfeeding, nutritional needs are higher because you also have to feed your baby. We recommend you not to fast and eat plenty of vegetables, proteins and healthy fats, like our chocolate bars ;) Diabetics under insulin medication also have to be aware if they want to fast. During a fast, insulin levels decrease so they will have to adjust the insulin units they get by injection to prevent a drop. Women with hormonal misbalances (like infertility or hypothyroidism) should talk about Intermittent Fasting with their endocrinologist because, in some cases, it can harm the thyroid or even can cause amenorrhea or other hormone-related issues. People with eating disorders also should avoid calorie-restriction strategies to not harm their health, physical and mental. If you think you have a problem managing your food intake, we recommend you to contact your health provider. When in doubt, always consult a trusted nutritionist or doctor, take the time to do your research and find a way of eating that’s right for you. Do you practice intermittent fasting? Tell us your experience or your questions on the comment section below! Other blogs you might enjoy: Website: https://marinaribas.es/. \| Instagram: @marina.ribas.torres * Disclaimer: This article is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or health provider with any questions you may have. Hinterlassen Sie einen Kommentar Bitte beachten Sie, dass Kommentare vor der Veröffentlichung freigegeben werden müssen Diese Website ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und es gelten die allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen und Datenschutzbestimmungen von Google.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Talk:List of ambassadors of the United States to Barbados Was NY Times incorrect? Was there a scandal? New York Times says in 1988 -- "Robert O. Johns, a California podiatrist with longstanding ties to Mr. Reagan, has been selected to be Ambassador to Barbados.". Was this? or was that their CIA name or something??? CaribDigita (talk) 20:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC) * https://www.nytimes.com/1988/08/08/us/washington-talk-briefing-island-bound.html	WIKI
Ha Tae-goon Ha Tae-kyun (하태균; born 2 November 1987) is a South Korean Football player who currently plays for Jeonnam Dragons. He was chosen as the number one draft pick for Suwon in 2007. Ha has also been nominated for the 2007 K-League Rookie of the Year Award. Club career After becoming the Top Goal Scorer in the "Geumgang-Daegi Korean High School Competition" with 6 goals in total, Ha was chosen by K-League giant Suwon Samsung Bluewings in the draft. In his debut season for Suwon, Ha scored the winning goal against Suwon's biggest rival FC Seoul on 8 April 2007, in a match that recorded the highest ever attendance (55,397) in K-League play. Having recorded 5 goals and 1 assist in 18 games in his debut season, Ha was nominated for the 2007 K-League Rookie of the Year Award. On 19 February 2015, Ha was loaned to China League One side Yanbian Changbaishan until 20 July 2015. He made a permanent transfer to Yanbianin in July 2015. In February 2017, Ha transferred to League One side Baoding Yingli Yitong. International career He participated in the 2007 FIFA U-20 World Cup with the South Korea national football team. Ha has made appearances for the South Korea national under-23 football team during the qualification for the 2008 Beijing Men's Football Olympics. Career statistics Statistics accurate as of match played 21 November 2020. Club * Suwon Samsung Bluewings * K League 1: 2008 * Korean FA Cup: 2009, 2010 * Korean League Cup: 2008 * Pan-Pacific Championship: 2009 * Sangju Sangmu * K League 2: 2013 * Yanbian Changbaishan * China League One: 2015 Individual * K-League Rookie of The Year: 2007 * China League One Most Valuable Player: 2015 * China League One Top Scorer: 2015	WIKI
User:Jmasseysr Jeffery Massey, Sr.-author who also writes under the pseudonym of “Poor Richard’s Son.” He is a native of Chicago, Illinois and a Viet Nam Era U.S. Air Force veteran. The author has a Masters of Education with focus in Special Education at Saint Xavier University in Illinois. Massey, a graduate of Dayton, Ohio’s Wright State University with a 2000 bachelor of arts degree in English-professional writing, is the author of the cross-genre, Sci-Fi speculative fiction novella “COLD BABY: As If Through A Glass and Darkly” written in the tradition of Raymond Chandler & Dashiell. Hammett’s Noir-driven, Hard-Boiled “Black Mask” writers. He is also a playwright who has authored the contemporary work “The Return of the Prodigal Child.” Mr. Massey has written more than 20 short stories and as a former journalism intern-reporter penned and had published several front-page stories and interview articles for the Columbus, Ohio Call and Post newspaper. Interviewees included former U.S. Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders and Capital University Professor of Law and author Floyd D. Weatherspoon. Mr. Massey has also been published on “Dark Planet” webzine as the author of PBS’s “Einstein Revealed” media review. Mr. Massey’s writing interests have focused upon media and literary criticism, multiple genre’s such as sci-fi/fantasy, speculative fiction, hard-boiled detective fiction, contemporary fiction, American humor, historically-based non-fiction and contemporary playwriting. He has been at work in Chicago, collaborating with his musician son on a musically-based drama/satire and researching for a non-fiction account of the first Black U.S. Marshal. Where to find Jeffery Massey online Website: http://jefferymasseyauthor.blogspot.com/2015/06/blog-post.html?m=1 Twitter: jmasseysr7 Facebook: Facebook profile LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jeffery-massey/14/500/a19 Blog: http://jmasseysr.wordpress.com/ Where to buy in print http://www.amazon.com/Jeffery-Massey/e/B004XEFBGW http://jefferymasseyauthor.blogspot.com/2015/06/blog-post.html?m=1	WIKI
1. Technology Using Lambda Calculus in Python By Greek letter lamda Poccil/Public Domain Prior to object-oriented programming and the creation of Python, one of the mainstays of computing was functional programming. For computer programming, a function is a calculus and might be defined as a set of results that are derived by performing a series of predictable manoeuvres on input matching certain characteristics or parameters. As noted in the tutorials for beginning Python, those parameters are the arguments of the function. To design a mathematical function in pseudo-code, it is a good idea to default to lambda forms. For example, to square a given input x, the computation is xx. But for lambda, we write the formal definition of the function: λ x. x ⋅ x This translates readily into Python: def square(x): return lambda x: xx In this case, Python will automatically determine the numerical nature of the argument. However, you can define character-manipulating functions similarly. For example to define substitution, one would write: λ x[y := x′] This function equates to all x such that y is substituted for x. In Python, one writes: def substitute(x) return x = x.replace(x, y) An example shell session that shows the flexibility of the replace string function follows: >>> x = 'cat' >>> y = 'dog' >>> x = x.replace(x, y) >>> x 'dog' >>> x = x.replace('o', y) >>> x 'ddogg' The virtue of using lambda notation to design functions is pretty plain. However, for more on functions, see "Beginning Python: Putting It All Together With Syntax". 1. About.com 2. Technology 3. Python 4. Beginning Python 5. Python Programming - Beginning Python- Functions - Lambda Functions ©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
User:Hcaboy/sandbox ŞΚεεΖΈ Μc'ğέέẒỀ my name is Hayden. Δlphabits make me happy small potatoes the reason dodo birds became extinct is because with a name like that you're kinda asking for it same the the bullshit lemur and the dipdeer	WIKI
Create a Discovery Mailbox to Store Search Results Applies to: Office 365 for enterprises, Live@edu Topic Last Modified: 2011-11-23 When you run a mailbox search, copies of the search results are stored in a special type of mailbox, called a discovery mailbox. Discovery mailboxes have these important characteristics: • They have a 50 GB quota, which is allows you to store large numbers of search results. • Only members of the Discovery Management role group have permissions to open the default Discovery Search Mailbox, which Microsoft Exchange creates. • E-mail messages can't be received by a discovery mailbox. When you use the Exchange Control Panel to create a mailbox search, search results can only be stored in a discovery mailbox. When do I create a discovery mailbox? By default, Microsoft Exchange creates a discovery mailbox named Discovery Search Mailbox. If you want to limit who can access the results of a mailbox search in your organization, you may want to create additional discovery mailboxes and assign permissions to open those mailboxes to specific people. For example, let's assume that personnel in your legal, human resources (HR), and information technology (IT) departments each have specific business needs to search users' mailboxes. You'll want to restrict who can access the search results to authorized personnel from the department who ran a specific search. In this case, you can create a discovery mailbox for each department and then assign permissions to open each of those mailboxes to the appropriate people. Create a discovery mailbox To create a discovery mailbox, run the following Windows PowerShell command: New-Mailbox -Name <String> -Discovery For example, to create discovery mailboxes for the legal, HR, and IT departments, run the following command: New-Mailbox -Name Legal_MailboxSearchResults -Discovery New-Mailbox -Name HR_MailboxSearchResults -Discovery New-Mailbox -Name IT_MailboxSearchResults -Discovery Identify the discovery mailboxes in your organization Discovery mailboxes aren't displayed on the Mailboxes tab in the Exchange Control Panel. To list all the discovery mailboxes in your organization, run the following command: Get-Mailbox -Resultsize unlimited -Filter {RecipientTypeDetails -eq "DiscoveryMailbox"} To list the display name of the discovery mailboxes in your organization: Get-Mailbox -Resultsize unlimited -Filter {RecipientTypeDetails -eq "DiscoveryMailbox"} \| FT DisplayName Assign permissions to open a discovery mailbox You have to explicitly assign users permissions to open a discovery mailbox that you've created. By default, members of the Discovery Management role group only have permissions to open the default Discovery Search Mailbox. To assign a user permissions to open a discovery mailbox and to access the results of a mailbox search, run the following command: Add-MailboxPermission <Display name of discovery mailbox> -User <Display Name> -AccessRights FullAccess For example, to give Dan Park permissions to open the discovery mailbox created for the HR department at Contoso University, run the following command: Add-MailboxPermission HR_MailboxSearchResults -User "Dan Park" -AccessRights FullAccess Identify which users have permissions to open a discovery mailbox To list the users who can open a specific discovery mailbox, run the following command: Get-MailboxPermission <Display name of discovery mailbox> \| Format-Table User,AccessRights,Deny For example, to display the users who can open the default Discovery Search Mailbox, run the following command: Get-MailboxPermission "Discovery Search Mailbox" \| Format-Table User,AccessRights,Deny In the output, the users who have a FullAccess value for the AccessRights attribute and a False value for the Deny attribute have the necessary permissions. Next steps Related help topics Loading... No resources were found.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Kendall Gammon Kendall Robert Gammon (born October 23, 1968) is an American former professional football player who was a long snapper and center for three teams in the National Football League (NFL). In 2004, Gammon was the first pure long snapper to be selected for the Pro Bowl. Gammon served as the analyst for the Kansas City Chiefs radio broadcasts until 2019. College career Gammon attended Pittsburg State University, where he was a captain of the football team his junior and senior year. He played tight end, offensive tackle, guard and also handled the long snapping. In 1991, Gammon was a part of the team coached by Chuck Broyles that won the Division II National Championship. NFL career Gammon was selected 291st overall in the 1992 NFL draft by the Pittsburgh Steelers. For the Steelers, he was the long snapper and backup center from 1992 to 1995. After spending four years with the New Orleans Saints, Gammon signed with the Chiefs as a free agent in February 2000. He was named to the Pro Bowl in 2005 as a special teams player, long snapping for the AFC team. Gammon was the first pure long snapper to be selected for the Pro Bowl. Gammon played in 218 consecutive games and appeared in Super Bowl XXX with the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1995. After the NFL In January 2008, Gammon returned to Pittsburg State, in Pittsburg, Kansas. He serves as the university’s Director of Development for Intercollegiate Athletics. Gammon was the co-owner of Paradise Nursery, a retail/wholesale distributor of nursery products in Kansas City, which was sold in 2013. Gammon has written two books, Life's a Snap: Building on the Past to Improve Your Future (ISBN<PHONE_NUMBER>403) and Game Plan: Leadership Lessons from the Best of the NFL (ISBN<PHONE_NUMBER>410). Gammon was on-air talent for the Chiefs Radio Network from 2008–2020, ending as the game color analyst following the retirement of Chiefs Pro Football Hall of Fame quarterback Len Dawson. Personal life Gammon married his college sweetheart while attending Pittsburg State. His son Blaise graduated from Kansas State where he played tight end.	WIKI
1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Diogenes DIOGENES, “the Cynic,” Greek philosopher, was born at Sinope about 412 B.C., and died in 323 at Corinth, according to Diogenes Laërtius, on the day on which Alexander the Great died at Babylon. His father, Icesias, a money-changer, was imprisoned or exiled on the charge of adulterating the coinage. Diogenes was included in the charge, and went to Athens with one attendant, whom he dismissed, saying, “If Manes can live without Diogenes, why not Diogenes without Manes?” Attracted by the ascetic teaching of Antisthenes, he became his pupil, despite the brutality with which he was received, and rapidly excelled his master both in reputation and in the austerity of his life. The stories which are told of him are probably true; in any case, they serve to illustrate the logical consistency of his character. He inured himself to the vicissitudes of weather by living in a tub belonging to the temple of Cybele. The single wooden bowl he possessed he destroyed on seeing a peasant boy drink from the hollow of his hands. On a voyage to Aegina he was captured by pirates and sold as a slave in Crete to a Corinthian named Xeniades. Being asked his trade, he replied that he knew no trade but that of governing men, and that he wished to be sold to a man who needed a master. As tutor to the two sons of Xeniades, he lived in Corinth for the rest of his life, which he devoted entirely to preaching the doctrines of virtuous self-control. At the Isthmian games he lectured to large audiences who turned to him from Antisthenes. It was, probably, at one of these festivals that he craved from Alexander the single boon that he would not stand between him and the sun, to which Alexander replied “If I were not Alexander, I would be Diogenes.” On his death, about which there exist several accounts, the Corinthians erected to his memory a pillar on which there rested a dog of Parian marble. His ethical teaching will be found in the article Cynics (q.v.). It may suffice to say here that virtue, for him, consisted in the avoidance of all physical pleasure; that pain and hunger were positively helpful in the pursuit of goodness; that all the artificial growths of society appeared to him incompatible with truth and goodness; that moralization implies a return to nature and simplicity. He has been credited with going to extremes of impropriety in pursuance of these ideas; probably, however, his reputation has suffered from the undoubted immorality of some of his successors. Both in ancient and in modern times, his personality has appealed strongly to sculptors and to painters. Ancient busts exist in the museums of the Vatican, the Louvre and the Capitol. The interview between Diogenes and Alexander is represented in an ancient marble bas-relief found in the Villa Albani. Rubens, Jordaens, Steen, Van der Werff, Jeaurat, Salvator Rosa and Karel Dujardin have painted various episodes in his life.	FINEWEB-EDU
Talk:Aniline Usage section (dye) cleanup I have redirected the article Aniline dye to this article, since the entire amount of material to be merged (quoted below) was quite brief; the last sentence is misleading if not actually completely incorrect. * "Aniline is a chemical that is a by product of burning elmo. The first synthetic dye (mauve, developed in 1856) was a coal tar product and contained the chemical aniline but the term "aniline" has been used to include other chemical type dyes. Today the term "aniline" is used mainly to differentiate natural dyes from the synthetic dyes." The usage section needs a copyedit and cleanup; I haven't got time right now, but I might get around to it if nobody else does. See also the notes regarding aniline-based dyestuffs here. --TenOfAllTrades 21:46, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) * This looks like a section from the 1911 Britannica: it is not accurate today! Physchim62 00:01, 25 August 2005 (UTC) * This article looks like its been cleaned up now, right? It's still listed on the chem portal front page as needing cleaning up user:austinbooth 20:49, 13 January 2005 Solubility in water? It says miscible, that can't be right, can it? * You're right; it's wrong. This site says 3.6 g/100 mL at 20 °C. The other solubility entries (miscible in ethanol and acetone) are correct, according to my CRC Handbook. Good catch. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 17:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC) products of combustion Does anyone know the products of combustion, and products of incomplete combustion for aniline? * Complete combustion will produce water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Ammonia is quoted here as a possible product of incomplete combustion, although I would still think that it is the nitrogen dioxide which would be the highest risk, not to mention unburnt aniline vapor. Physchim62 (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC) Safety Data will have to go Wiki is not a repository for safety data, the references should suffice. propose to axe this section V8rik 19:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC) * Agreed, section is a goner, links should be enough (or find it yourself in Chemical sources). --Dirk Beetstra T C 21:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC) You two should look at hydrazine, which I have started to revise slightly.--Smokefoot 23:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC) * Which safety data are you talking about? The presentation seems fairly standard to me. Physchim62 (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC) * I see it now, yes, that sort of section should go: it could be placed on the data page if anyone really wanted to, but not in the article. Links to commercial MSDS pose the same sort of problem as Chemical sources, although there is a dedicated section on the data page if anyone ever used it! Physchim62 (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC) It should just not be here, bit too much of a risk giving wrong data. Same goes indeed for single MSDS links. They are biased. On Chemical sources at least one can choose one .. if ever it would get to functionality (if it gets used is then a second question). But I think it is a good plan to keep savery data to a minimum, and preferably referenced. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC) making black? what is the best way to make aniline black we are using potassium chlorate —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Needs a redirect At Coal dye, Coal tar dye, and probably others as well. ~ender 2008-10-05 5:52:AM MST * Done. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Rocket fuel Aniline is hypergolic with RFNA (red fuming nitric acid) and the combination was used as a rocket fuel for JATO during WWII (Ignition, John Clark, p.21). Worth adding to the uses? Richard Gadsden (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC) * Yes, I would say so. Although an historical niche use, and while data on the current usage is of course important, minor uses in past times are of interest and use to non-technical lay readers. That, I suggest, is the very purpose of an encyclopaedia. To help the less-well informed. Wikipedia isn't a technical reference book for chemical engineers. It has to service the needs of others too. * I suggest something like this. * Aniline was used as a fuel with a RFNA oxidiser in the MGM-5 Corporal Surface-to-surface tactical missile fielded in considerable numbers by both the US Army and the British Army, principally in West Germany, and carried a W-7 atomic warhead; the first US missile to be nuclear-armed. It was broadly comparable in design and purpose with the Soviet Scud-A missile of similar vintage. Corporal was an important development as the first attempt by the United States in replacement of long-range artillery to suit the post-WW2 era. Very much a learning exercise, and was succeeded by a series of solid-fuelled missiles, easier and less hazardous for troops to handle. Considerable numbers were deployed and test fired by 10 US Army battalions and 2 British battalions, eight of them in Germany. * George.Hutchinson (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC) It is also used as fuel in the Aerobee rocket's second stage engine. * About 2,000,000,000 kg of aniline are produced annually, according to the Ullmann Encyclopedia. So many niche apps that merely use a million or two kg will do not get a full discussion.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC) * Usage stats are only a part of the picture Smokefoot. Usage history is important too. Those who deny history an airing are doomed to repeat it's mistakes. Esp when the "million or two kg" had the power to bring civilisation as we know it to an end. * George.Hutchinson (talk) 14:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC) * Right. If we relied on usage stats, a lot of pharma etc would be dismissed as minor contributors to civilization because not many tons were produced compared to bulk apps. It's a judgement call, and I am not the cop here. I do know from experience that some editors seem to over-rate (my term) the significance of things that blow up. It's a guy thing. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC) * "A guy thing". Wonderful insult Smokefoot. How is it that when a contributor loses an arguement they feel a need to resort to a crude insult? Is that a guy thing too? George.Hutchinson Copyright problem removed Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Suspected TYPO (or something like that) The name of the section Aniline of this article contains the preposition "at". That word does not sound right to me. I don't think it would ever be used like that (in a context like this), by someone (e.g. a native speaker) who had a good knowledge of correct English language usage. I think it should be changed -- probably to [something like] OR * "Reactions involving nitrogen" * "Reactions with substances containing nitrogen". (Right?) Any comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 00:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC) * It refers to the moiety, where the reaction takes place, i.e. the nitrogen atom in the aniline molecule. --Leyo 18:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC) External links modified (January 2018) Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Aniline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: * Added archive https://archive.is/20020219104231/http://www.the-innovation-group.com/ChemProfiles/Aniline.htm to http://www.the-innovation-group.com/ChemProfiles/Aniline.htm Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC) To add to article To add to the header of this article: the pronunciation of "aniline." <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 22:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Physical characteristics It is an oily liquid with pungent, musty fishy odour. It is colorless with a bluish fluorescence when freshly distilled and gets photo-oxidised on exposure to air and light becoming yellowish to brownish. -Shubjt 02:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC) * very good quote. But its colorless.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)	WIKI
#!/usr/bin/make -f # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. # export DH_VERBOSE=1 PYTHONS:=$(shell pyversions -vr) PYTHON3S:=$(shell py3versions -vr) override_dh_auto_build: set -e ; set -x ; for i in $(PYTHONs) $(PYTHON3S) ; do \ PYTHON=python$$i python$$i setup.py build --force ; \ done # renaming pflags to avoid conflict between python and python3 versions cp -p pchrt pchrt2 cp -p pchrt pchrt3 cp -p pchrt.1 pchrt2.1 cp -p pchrt.1 pchrt3.1 cp -p ptaskset ptaskset2 cp -p ptaskset ptaskset3 cp -p ptaskset.1 ptaskset2.1 cp -p ptaskset.1 ptaskset3.1 sed -i -e 's/python/python3/' pchrt3 sed -i -e 's/python/python3/' ptaskset3 override_dh_auto_install: python2.7 setup.py install --install-layout=deb --root $(CURDIR)/debian/python-schedutils set -e ; set -x ; for i in $(PYTHON3S) ; do \ python$$i setup.py install --install-layout=deb --root $(CURDIR)/debian/python3-schedutils ; \ done # Removing original binaries as now we have renamed versions # to avoid conflicts between python2 and python3 # We'll put the original back with update-alternatives in postinst rm -f debian/python-schedutils/usr/bin/pchrt rm -f debian/python-schedutils/usr/bin/ptaskset rm -f debian/python-schedutils/usr/share/man/man1/pchrt.1 rm -f debian/python-schedutils/usr/share/man/man1/ptaskset.1 rm -f debian/python3-schedutils/usr/bin/pchrt rm -f debian/python3-schedutils/usr/bin/ptaskset rm -f debian/python3-schedutils/usr/share/man/man1/pchrt.1 rm -f debian/python3-schedutils/usr/share/man/man1/ptaskset.1 clean: if [ -f setup.py ]; then dh $@ --buildsystem python_distutils --with python2,python3; fi rm -rf build python_schedutils.egg-info rm -f pchrt2 pchrt3 pchrt2.1 pchrt3.1 ptaskset2 ptaskset3 ptaskset2.1 ptaskset3.1 rm -f .gitignore %: dh $@ --buildsystem python_distutils --with python2,python3	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Anda di halaman 1dari 21 Introduction to Research What is research? A process through which new knowledge is discovered. Salkind, Neil J. (2000) A systematic and organized effort to investigate a specific problem. Sekaran, Uma (1992) Why research? Attempts to seek answers to questions Draws conclusion from data Generalize conclusion Adds to the existing body of knowledge Improves understanding of the real world Improves understanding of our own practice Deductive and inductive Deductive s tarts with a theory and through observation and experiment test the theory Inductive based on existing data/observation trying to generate a theory Types of Research Applied research To solve a currently existing problem; Basic/pure/fundamental research To improve understanding; To generate knowledge; To build theories. High Quality Researches (Salkind) Based on the works of others. Can be replicated. Generalizable to other settings. Based on some logical rationale and tied to theory. High Quality Researches - contd Doable. Generates new questions and cyclical in nature. Incremental. Apolitical taken for the betterment of society. Scientists / Researchers Accomplish works through adherence to guidelines. Share the same philosophy about how questions should be answered. Share a standard sequence of steps in formulating and answering a question. Research Model Salkind, Neil J. (2000) Asking new questions Reconsidering the theory Asking the question Identifying important factors Formulating a hypothesis Working with the hypothesis Testing the hypothesis Collecting relevant information Asking the Question (Identifying a Need) 1st and most important step. broad Imagination & experience Questions specific Identifying Important Factors Select factors that: Have not been investigated before. Contribute to the understanding of the question. Available to investigate. Hold some interest, personally or professionally. Lead to another question. Formulating a Hypothesis A hypothesis is: Objective extension of the original question. Statement that expresses relationships between variables as an Ifthen statements. Poses a question in a testable form. Posits clear relationship between factors. Test Hypotheses, not to Prove them. Working With the Hypothesis confirm Factors considered were important and related. Results Valuable information refute Learn something not known previously. Reconsidering the Theory Explains things that orrurred in the past. THEORY Predicts things that will occur in the future. Modify/Confirm Results of research Asking New Questions Could be a variation of the original question, or A refinement of the original question (more depth). Scientific Research (Sekaran) focused on the goal of problem solving and pursues a step-by-step logical, organized, and rigorous method to identify problems, gather data, analyze, and draw valid conclusions What is research? Organized there is a structure or method and it is focused and limited to a specific scope Systematic- there is a definite set of procedures and steps to follow so as to get accurate results Questions It is focused on relevant and useful and important questions. Without it research has no focus or purpose. Characteristics of Scientific Research (Sekaran) Purposiveness Rigor Testability Replicability Precision and Confidence Objectivity Generalizability Parsimony End of Introduction to Research	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
User:Hugogirardisking Money $L Sean Lewandowski (born August 20, 1987), better known by his stage name Money $L, is an American rapper from Connellsville, Pennsylvania. His first mixtape, C'Villain: Expect The Unexpected, was released on XXX. It features collaborations with Wiz Khalifa, Lyfe Jennings, Mr. Porter, and Johnny Juliano. His first album The Harder They Fall is due for release in Summer 2009.	WIKI
cements, soluble glass cements, soluble glass defined in 1909 year cements, soluble glass - Cements, Soluble Glass; cements, soluble glass - When finely pulverised chalk is stirred into a solution of soluble glass of 30° B. until the mixture is fine and plastic, a cement is obtained which will harden in 6 or 8 hours, possessing an extraordinary durability, and alike applicable for domestic and industrial purposes. It may be used for uniting stone, brick, etc., and for filling up cracks. In short, it seems to be applicable to about the same purposes for which plaster-of-Paris is used, but it is much harder and stronger. If for part of the chalk some colouring matter be substituted, differently coloured cements of the same general character are obtained. The following materials give good results: 1. Finely pulverised or levigated stibnite (grey antimony, or black sulphide of antimony) will produce a dark cement, which, after burnishing with an agate, will present a metallic appearance. 2. Pulverised cast iron, a grey cement. 3. Zinc dust (so-called zinc grey), an exceedingly hard grey cement, which, after burnishing, will exhibit the white and brilliant appearance of metallic zinc. This cement may be employed with advantage in mending ornaments and vessels of zinc, sticking well to metals, stone, and wood. 4. Carbonate of copper, a bright green cement. 5. Sesquioxide of chromium, a dark green cement. 6. Thenard's blue (cobalt blue), a blue cement. 7. Minium, an orange-coloured cement. 8. Vermilion, a splendid red cement. 9. Carmine red, a violet cement. near cements, soluble glass in Knolik cements, shellachome letter "C" start from "CE" cements, sorel's definition of word "cements, soluble glass" was readed 688 times Legal info	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
User:The Cunctator Edited Pages - Talk - Negative Talk "a radical that ploughs up the roots of our social fabric." Before Wikipedia, The Cunctator promoted the spread of the Hamster Dance. The Cunctator created or edited most of the articles that got punted off into the Sep. 11 wiki. He created the second Wikipedia logo, which riffed on the Nupedia logo design. The design of the "Wikipedia" text below a sphere remains from that logo. He helped spur the creation of WikiSource (then discussed as Project Sourceberg). His policy debates with Larry Sanger drove Sanger to distraction and precipitated his exiting the project (see "The Hive" by Marshall Poe). He was a member-in-protest of the Arbitration Cabal, which came into being through discussion not on Wikipedia, but on the vile mailing list. He lost the seat in the elections of late 2004 most likely due to his being a big slacker. The recent tendencies toward deletionism and agglomeration are troubling. Are the gigantic image-heavy "we look like Encarta" entries really better for the Wikipedia than more atomic Jargon-file-esque entries? There are some interesting backend search/sort/display technologies that could bridge the divide. For example, the default editing allows people to independently edit sections, instead of the whole page at once. Those sections act in a way as independent wiki-pages that just happen to be hierarchically linked. One can imagine giving these section-wikis more autonomy. WikiData does an effective job of stripping copyleft from Wikipedia for the benefit of Big Tech. This is nonsense: "Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves." Some modest proposals (which could be tried as experiments) to consider: * Turn off Articles for Deletion. * Make non-empty edit summaries mandatory for all edits not marked as minor * Make admin rights automatic for all regular editors To be a good Wikipedian, be respectful, overly combative, self-critical, vulnerable, hortatory, ambitious, and analytical. Above all, to be a good Wikipedian, edit and create entries. To ensure the health of Wikipedia: * Be in Charge and Be Humble * Understand Bias * Appreciate Idiosyncracy * Redesign the Wikipedia Software as a Community * Make Big Plans on Wikipedia * Avoid Cabals * Follow the Spirit of the GFDL * Be Respectful but Firm Bad Ideas * Defender of the Wiki Barnstar * RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar * Articles for deletion * Semi-protection policy * Editing other people's userpages. * Deleting BJAODN * Editing other people's comments. * Association of Deletionist Wikipedians * Template cruft like Totally-disputed and Dubious. What's this aversion to actually editing? * Using the revert tool to "collaborate" with other editors. * Subverting Wikipedia's copyleft (which requires derivative works also be copylefted) with the public-domain Wikidata project, which allows corporations like Google (which not coincidentally funds Wikimedia with a microscopic fraction of the benefits it receives from Wikimedia editors' labor) to convert Wikimedians work into Google IP. * Deleting well-sourced, informative articles like Gabe Amo Commentary * Please help build 911 Attack memorial. * Project Sourceberg. * How to Destroy Wikipedia. * How to Build Wikipedia * WikipediAhimsa -- Avoid harm. A principle the Cunctator strives imperfectly towards. * TMC's sysop request * /Wikipedia Quality The nearly immutable law of government is that while over the short term dangers to the health of society come from individual actors, over the long term the dangers come from the system. It should be everyone's goal to figure out ways to eliminate potential problems before they can happen. A good real world example of that is drugs; because it is a criminal act to use illegal drugs, millions of dollars and manhours and lives are spent in combatting drug use (the "war on drugs"). But if the drugs (such as marijuana) are decriminalized, a host of downstream costs to society disappear. There are different complications and needs (tobacco is a good example of the potential problems of having drugs be legal to use) but it's a lot easier to deal with drugs as a health issue than a crime issue. As of 2006, Wikipedia has definitely become a place where it is frighteningly easy to get kicked out of the club. There's more worry about one's words upsetting other users than whether one does good work or whether people should be getting upset in the first place. June 2006 Jimmy Wales may argue that the NYT got the situation "exactly backwards", but the reality is that this is a semantic game and in this case the contrarian position the NYT is arguing is, if not ultimately correct, an important one to have. Wikipedia benefits by having outsiders challenging Wikipedia to be and remain open and free. Institutions by their nature are conservative and self-protecting, and their commitment to their claimed ideals must face constant challenge for them to remain true to said ideals. I would say that neither Wales nor the NYT is really right-- I would argue that Wikipedia, as it grows in size and prominence, is evolving rapidly and in ways that no one person could possibly understand fully. That Wikipedia will always be straddling the uncomfortable divide between reliability and editability, just as it embodies conflicts between universality and topicality, brevity and completeness, accessibility and accuracy, etc. It is neither the golden perfect lovely machine that Wales seems so insistent on portraying nor the decadent failure its critics decry. I would be happier if we lived in a world where the New York Times was writing articles promoting the promise of Wikipedia and Jimmy Wales was its biggest critic, finding fault where others see none, but I don't get to choose the world I live in. That said, I found it quite interesting how Larry Sanger is now lost from the official narrative of the creation of Wikipedia. History belongs to the victors, I suppose. Although I became one of his most active critics during his tenure, he does not deserve to become a footnote, or worse, forgotten. November 2007 How you know Wikipedia has jumped the shark: the great article on w00t has been deleted. September 2008 How on earth does deleting Transmogrifier improve Wikipedia? Wikipedia has not only jumped the shark, it's nuked the fridge. January 2009 Ah well, as we come to 2009, it's evident that Wikipedia has entered the end of its lifecycle. Can't say I didn't warn you. update 2018: \|bar\|All~1980010100~2018080900\|~total en.wikipedia is in senescence but \|bar\|All~1980010100~2018080900\|~total wikimedia is doing okay. August 2018 Google, Facebook, and others are disrespecting Wikipedia's copyleft. This is not good. Apologies to anyone whom my words have hurt. I should do a better job being explicit that I believe people who I disagree with are acting in good faith as well. As the Wiki Turns Check out the brilliant humor of Wikipedia's writers. Wikipedians who have left: ManningBartlett (returned), Piotr Wozniak, Corvus13, JHK, AndreEngels, Isis, KQ, User:Kat. Kick-outs: Mathjis, 24, user:H.J., Lir, Clutch Hi Cunc. For the record, I never actually left. I just refused to log in for several years and edited anonymously. Edit Count should not be a measure of significance. Manning (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Numbers * HD-DVD Controversy Workshopping * /Advice for Lir * /HomePage Vandalism * /Questionable pages * /SOU * /ByTopic * User:The Cunctator/NotHere * User:The Cunctator/Scrap * /Refs/ * /Engineeering Music Society/ * /Conversations with DreamGuy * /ACES * /ACES drafts * /Billionaires in the 2020 presidential election What's getting deleted * Steve Gilliard * WP:BJAODN * Friedman (unit) * AACS encryption key controversy * Samuel Hook * Billionaire supporters of Hillary Clinton et al * Reduced gas (A reduced gas is a gas with a low oxidation number (or high reduction), and is usually hydrogen-rich. Strongly reduced gases include methane, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide.)	WIKI
Page:The New Negro.pdf/217 Rh Ah ain't denyin' that! She must 'a' liked him a little or it wouldn't 'a' happened. And he must 'a' liked huh a little, too! Why should I have to pay, then, if she's as much to blame as he is! {{c\|{{asc\|JANE}} You kin stand there and talk like that if you want to, but if Ah'd say let's punish 'em both and make 'em get married you'd set up a big howl! {{c\|{{asc\|CARTER}}}} Wouldn't I have a right to? {{c\|JANE}} Ah don't know that you would! She's as good as he is, and it wouldn't be the first time that ever happened in these parts! {{c\|{{asc\|CARTER}}}} But it ain't goin' to happen this time. {{c\|{{asc\|JANE}}}} Ah know it ain't, and that ain't what Ah'm after. Ah don't believe in no forced marriages. {{c\|{{asc\|CARTER}}}} What is you after? {{c\|{{asc\|JANE}}}} Ah want you to do somethin' for ma children to make up for the harm that's come to us by you and yours. {{nop}}	WIKI
Rire & Chansons Rire & Chansons (French for "laughter and songs") is a French Category C and D radio station owned by NRJ Group, based at Paris and created in 1981. Rire & Chansons has a unique format in France, offering round-the-clock sketch comedy alternated with a mixed music programming consisted of mainly Pop-Rock. Rire & Chansons maintains two sub-feeds for Réunion and Tahiti areas; each of the feeds carry entirely separate programming content & schedule from the national feed. History Rire & Chansons is created by Jean-Paul Baudecroux in 1989 in Paris on the Parisian frequency of the defunct radio station Pacific FM, which was acquired by the NRJ Group and the frequencies were redistributed to Chérie FM. As the name suggests, and still in use today, it broadcasts comedy shows, sketches, funny stories and parodies, alongside playing a variety of French and international pop-rock songs. Currently music is not included in the morning and afternoon drive show "100% Sketches". Rire & Chansons is the world's only French radio station to transmit this type of programming around the clock. In 1995, the NRJ group created "GIE RIRE" (for "independent regional radios") in order to commercialize several local radio stations that broadcast unidentified programs similar to Rire & Chansons. The entire network is created with the support of Marc Zénou, president of the SNRP (Syndicat national des radios privées, National Union of Private Radio) and head of Radio Star (Mulhouse) and Radio Service. The local programs disappeared to give way to non-presenter programs identified by the slogan "la radio du rire". In 1997, NRJ forced the hand of the CSA which had not yet authorized the group to create a new national network. The program of affiliated radios is renamed Rire & Chansons. After negotiations, NRJ pledged to maintain local stations and their staff, and the CSA officially authorized the creation of the network. In 1999, following the acquisition of Nostalgie by NRJ, the CSA forced NRJ to close down Rire & Chansons' local stations. This decision will allow NRJ to maintain a national network at a lower cost, without the need to fulfill the cost of local staffers in the network. Philippe Bouvard joins Rire & Chansons in 2000 after serving as Les Grosses Têtes's interim director on RTL. From 2003 to 2012, the radio was signalized by prank calls of the animator and humorist Gérald Dahan. Several political figures such as Jean-Pierre Raffarin or Nicolas Sarkozy and sports figures like Raymond Domenech and Zinédine Zidane were trapped. 22 February 2012, after the disclosure on the Internet of a wrong call to the detriment of the candidate for the French presidential election of 2012, Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, the radio decides to stop his collaboration with the animator. In September 2011, following the eviction of Laurent Baffie from Europe 1, the station offers him a chance to host C'est quoi ce bordel ? show on air every Sunday morning at 11. The show closed down in January 2013. Slogans * From 1989 to 2011 : Du rire et du Rock / Du rire garanti toutes les 3 minutes (The laugh and the rock / The laugh guaranteed every 3 minutes) * From 2011 to 2016 : La radio officielle du rire ! (The official station to laugh!) * Since 2017 : La radio du rire ! (The station to laugh!) Live hosts * Bruno Roblès (weekdays 6:00am – 10:00am) * Christophe Marceaux (weekdays 10:00am – 1:00pm) * Sébastien Boché (weekdays 4:00pm – 8:00pm) * Stéphane Hagopian (weekends 12:00pm – 4:00pm) * Didier Raynal (weekdays 1:00pm – 4:00pm) * Jean-Paul Dahbar (weekends 6:00am – 12:00pm) * Michaël Vigneron (weekends 4:00pm – 10:00pm) Web-radios The station Rire et Chansons broadcasts on FM, and is also available on the internet, with currently 17 web-radios. * Rire & Chansons Blagues * Rire & Chansons Canulars * Rire & Chansons Collectors * Rire & Chansons Duos * Rire & Chansons en Amoureux * Rire & Chansons Futurs Talents * Rire & Chansons Hommage à Coluche * Rire & Chansons Humour du Sud * Rire & Chansons Live * Rire & Chansons Nouvelle Génération * Rire & Chansons One Woman Show * Rire & Chansons Open du Rire * Rire & Chansons Semoun * Rire & Chansons Sketches * Rire & Chansons Stand-up * Rire & Chansons Vacances	WIKI
Talk:James Augustus Grant Officer or soldier? Was Grant an officer or a soldier when he was in the Army? I would like to add this to the occupation section of the infobox, but I don't know which to put. I want it to eventually say officer and explorer or soldier and explorer. Mehmet Karatay 11:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)	WIKI
Maurel et Prom chief sells out to Indonesia's Pertamina PARIS/JAKARTA (Reuters) - Indonesian state energy firm Pertamina plans to buy a one quarter stake in France’s Maurel et Prom from its boss and extend the offer to take over the rest of the Africa-focused oil company in a deal that could value it at close to $1 billion. Pertamina said the acquisition of the 24.5 percent stake from Maurel et Prom (M&P) Chairman and Chief Executive Jean-Francois Henin would fit well with plans to bolster its upstream business globally. M&P (MAUP.PA), one of many independent oil exploration and production companies suffering from weak oil prices, has been looking for a partner for several years, but may have been able to fetch a much higher price had it agreed to a buyout earlier. Back in 2013, Henin confirmed he had been in talks with potential buyers for the whole company. On Monday, he told Reuters Pertamina had been among them, but that discussions had foundered on price. Three years ago the company was worth close to four times more than it is now. Nevertheless, Henin said he was happy with the deal to sell the company which can trace its roots back to 1831 and the development of shipping lines and trading posts in West Africa. “They (Pertamina) can achieve something that corresponds with my dreams for Maurel et Prom because they give the company a means for development,” he said. Henin holds his stake through a company called Pacifico, which is selling out for 4.20 euros a share, plus a potential 0.50 euro earnout linked to the price of crude oil next year. P&M’s shares closed at 2.85 euros on Friday and were suspended from trading on Monday morning. The full offer, to be made on the same terms as for Henin’s stake, should come later this year, Henin said. At that price it would value the whole company at up to 891.9 million euros ($996 mln) based on a total 189,764,042 shares in issue. Its market value was about 541 million euros at the close of business on Friday. M&P refocused on oil and gas exploration at the end of the 20th century. Its production operations are in Gabon oil and Tanzanian gas. It also has exploration assets elsewhere including Namibia, Nigeria, Tanzania, Myanmar, Canada, and Italy. ($1 = 0.8956 euros) Additional reporting and writing by Andrew Callus; Editing by Louise Heavens and Susan Fenton	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 November 9 Template:User FA The result of the discussion was no consensus. NPASR, but if so it should be done at MFD. Primefac (talk) 18:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FA with Template:User Featured articles. * User FA * User Featured articles Consolidate content contribution userboxes. These seem to have the same purpose. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Can we just get speedy decisions on all of these userbox merges so everyone's user pages can stop looking awful? Morgan695 (talk) 17:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC) * , the general practice seems to be that discussion (and in general individually) is preferred for most templates. Speedy deletion has the possibility of breaking things and also upsetting people which would be bad :(. The disruption should only last for at most another few weeks, likely much less as these discussions are closed. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User FAw The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Featured articles. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FAw with Template:User Featured articles. * User FAw * User Featured articles Consolidate user content contribution navboxes. These seem to have the same purpose. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Support User Featured articles has all of FAw inside it. Template:User FPO The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Featured portals. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FPO with Template:User Featured portals. * User FPO * User Featured portals Consolidate content creation userboxes. These have the same purpose and should be merged (or FPO replace/deleted). Tom (LT) (talk) 23:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge per nominator. — 🦊 23:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge - These infoboxes have the same purpose.Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:31, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User FPortal The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Featured Portal. Primefac (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FPortal with Template:User Featured Portal. * User FPortal * User Featured Portal Consolidate content creation userboxes. These have the same purpose and should be merged (or FPortal replace/deleted). Tom (LT) (talk) 23:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge - These infoboxes have the same purpose.Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User FL The result of the discussion was no consensus. NPASR, but if so it should be done at MFD. Primefac (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FL with Template:User Featured List. * User FL * User Featured List Consolidate user content creation infoboxes. These infoboxes seem to have the same purpose. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Oppose. These seem to serve different purposes. One lists an individual FL, the other counts them. --Coemgenus (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User Featured Lists2 The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Featured lists. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User Featured Lists2 with Template:User Featured lists. * User Featured Lists2 * User Featured lists Consolidate user content creation infoboxes. These infoboxes seem to have the same purpose. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Strong merge They're essentially the same thing. ~ HAL 333 19:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC) * Support per nominator. Aviator006 (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC) * Support merge per nomination. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 23:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge as they are duplicates of each other. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User FP Nominator The result of the discussion was no consensus. No participation. WP:NPASR, but if renominated should be done at WP:MfD. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FP Nominator with Template:User FP. * User FP Nominator * User FP I propose merge to User FP and replace delete this template. Consolidate userboxes related to multiple FPs. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User FP Nominator 2 The result of the discussion was no consensus. No participation. WP:NPASR, but if renominated should be done at WP:MfD. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FP Nominator 2 with Template:User FP. * User FP Nominator 2 * User FP I propose merge to User FP and replace delete this template. Consolidate userboxes related to multiple FPs. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User Featured Picture Nominator The result of the discussion was no consensus. NPASR, but if so it should be done at MFD. Primefac (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User Featured Picture Nominator with Template:User Featured Picture. * User Featured Picture Nominator * User Featured Picture Used once, this template has the same purpose and formatting as the more widely used User Featured Picture. I propose it is replaced and deleted. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * They are different. Template:User Featured Picture is for users who created or uploaded the photo. Template:User Featured Picture Nominator is for individuals who simply nominate the photo. Seddon talk 23:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Oppose One template focuses about the picture, the other talks about the user. Techie3 (talk) 13:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User FT The result of the discussion was no consensus. No participation. WP:NPASR, but renomination should be done at WP:MfD. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User FT with Template:User Featured topics. * User FT * User Featured topics Consolidate user content contribution userboxes. These appear to be pretty much the same. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User Wikinews FA The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Created in 2012, unused, and we are not Wikinews. Delete. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * User Wikinews FA * Delete unused and no use for it as we are not Wikinews. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 18:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC) * Delete: per nom - 2pou (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User A-Class Article The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User A-Class Article. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the page's undeletion. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User A Article and Template:User A-class with Template:User A-Class Article. * User A-class * User A Article * User A-Class Article Consolidate A-class article userboxes. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:Gerardo Díaz y su Gerarquía The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Richard3120 with the reason "Unpopulated navbox, and the artist has no albums with articles in order to populate the template." F ASTILY 22:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Gerardo Díaz y su Gerarquía * Delete: Fails navigation point 4 of WP:NAV-WITHIN. It can be re-created if more articles are created later. - 2pou (talk) 18:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Template:La Dinastía de Tuzantla, Michoacán The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Redundant. Only has one entry, and the artist has no other albums with their own articles in order to be able to add to this template. Should be deleted and only recreated if and when articles for the other albums are created. Richard3120 (talk) 22:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * La Dinastía de Tuzantla, Michoacán * Delete: Fails navigation point 4 of WP:NAV-WITHIN. It can be re-created if more articles are created later. - 2pou (talk) 18:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Template:Top25 The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Top 25 report as the clear first step, but without prejudice against ' suggestion for further discussion about whether the combined banner should be removed entirely to reduce banner blindness. (non-admin closure) {{u\| Sdkb }}  talk 23:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Top25 with Template:Top 25 report. * Top25 * Top 25 report These templates are nearly functionally equivalent. The former is typically used for the most viewed page, while the latter is used for being somewhere on the top 25 (in any nth place). But the former allows a param to specify the place, and the latter allows comments for the same. They're used on many articles separately, bloating the page (eg Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput). I don't see a reason why this can't be merged into one template. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge per nom, preferably preserving Template:Top 25 report .--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge: The templates serve virtually the exact same purpose. No reason for there not to be a merge. Benmite (talk) 07:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC) * (Speedy) merge into Top 25 report. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 12:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC) * Delete or merge. I'm not sure what readers are supposed to do with the information that the article was among the most viewed on a particular week. It doesn't affect how we edit the page and doesn't help us improve the article which is the entire purpose of the talk page. Removing these would result in less banner blindness and people actually reading the more important banners. It is also worth nothing that by definition these have to be very popular articles most of which have a lot of banners. A merge would definitely be preferable to have two templates for the same purpose though. --Trialpears (talk) 07:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge per nom, but delete would be just destruction on a whim. Whether we individually find something useful or not, we should accept that many other people do find value in it. Ref (chew) (do) 09:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC) Template:Nation The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Based on (now deleted) article created by new editor, I think that this malformed template was intended to be a fill-in-the-box method for creating "nations" on Wikipedia. (Not sure what that means.) I don't see any use for it. Schazjmd (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Nation * Support per nom. {{u\| Sdkb }}  talk 04:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Support agree with the nominator. I saw the nonsensical article by said new editor and it's clear to see how the existence of such a template could inspire imitation. Modussiccandi (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User GA log The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Good Articles2. Primefac (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User GA log with Template:User GAarticleswritten. * User GA log * User GAarticleswritten Consolidate GA userboxes. I propose replace / merge and delete. This template is used once, poorly formatted, obscurely titled, and looks ugly. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge or delete. As the person who apparently created this template I totally agree. — 🦊 23:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Support merge. Consolidation of userboxes is also one the tasks of WikiProject Userboxes. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge or delete, but merge to either Template:User Good Articles or Template:User Good Articles2; Template:User GAarticleswritten should not be one of the templates that survives this series of merge proposals. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User good articles 2 The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Good Articles2. Primefac (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User good articles 2 with Template:User GAarticleswritten. * User good articles 2 * As above * User GAarticleswritten As above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Is that the right target? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Thanks, my mistake. Have corrected.--Tom (LT) (talk) 22:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles2, not Template:User GAarticleswritten. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User Good Articles The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Good Articles2. Noting that the other discussion found a consensus to move the nom-suggested target, this one remains the only option. In effect, this is basically just saying consolidate Template:User Good Articles and Template:User Good Articles2. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User Good Articles with Template:User GAarticleswritten. * User Good Articles * User GAarticleswritten As above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles or Template:User Good Articles2. * Merge to Template:User Good Articles2, because it allows usage without specifying the number of articles, while number of articles is required in Template:User Good Articles. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles --► Sincerely: Sola Virum 00:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge as above, no preference which way round. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 11:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User GAw The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Good Articles2. Primefac (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User GAw with Template:User GAarticleswritten. * User GAw * User GAarticleswritten As above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles or Template:User Good Articles2. --Gonnym (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Mergo to Template:User Good Articles2 (which is where Template:User GAarticleswritten and Template:User Good Articles have been merged to). BlueMoonset (talk) 00:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC) * Wrong venue – Use WP:MfD instead. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) * Pointless WP:BURO. --Gonnym (talk) 12:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User Good Articles3 The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Good Articles2. Noting the other discussion found a decision to merge the originally suggested target by nom, so only this target remains an available option. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User Good Articles3 with Template:User GAarticleswritten. * User Good Articles3 * User GAarticleswritten As above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles or Template:User Good Articles2. --Gonnym (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles3, or even Template:User Good Articles or Template:User Good Articles2 and definitely not to Template:User GAarticleswritten. Aviator006 (talk) 22:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User Good Articles2 The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Good Articles2. By the way, userboxes (of any namespace) generally go to MfD, but I'll let you off :-) (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User Good Articles2 with Template:User GAarticleswritten. * User Good Articles2 * User GAarticleswritten Merge all the good articles userboxes into a single userbox for ease of maintenance, consistency. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Comment saw this after the long "the template below (User Good Articles2) is being considered for merging..." wreaked havoc on my userpage layout, and just want to say: I use "User Good Articles2" rather than "GAarticleswritten" because the latter does not have a counter, and has a dark, low-contrast appearance that looks awful to me. I don't particularly care how things are set up on a technical side, but replacing this with GAarticlewritten would be an absolute downgrade in my opinion.--AlexandraIDV 00:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge, but I agree with Alexandra. I've tested the colors used in both templates on a contrast accessibility checker and User GAarticleswritten colors fails while User Good Articles2 passes. So as WP:ACCESSABILITY has priority over style, the merge should be the other way. This is also the colors used by Template:User Good Article. --Gonnym (talk) 08:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Comment I'm here for the same reason as Alexandra. I think this template is superior to the first one, and if merging the two means a removal of "User Good Articles2", then my vote is against. ImaginesTigers (talk) 12:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge but please keep the layout of Good Articles2, I like the counter and the colour. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge, but I agree that the format of Good Articles2 is preferable. —-Coemgenus (talk) 16:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles2, per arguments above. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Merge to Template:User Good Articles2, which is clearly preferable. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC) * Comment: I'm wondering whether it might be better to come out of this series of merge requests with two or three templates in all, because they don't all represent the same level or type of participation. Some are "written or significantly contributed to" (Template:User GAw and Template:User good articles 2, which appear to do the same thing, some just mention "written" (Template:User GAarticleswritten), some say "contributed" (which could be almost anything: Template:User Good Articles2 does this, though it allows "contributed" to be changed to some other word or phrase, and Template:User Good Article Significant says "significantly contributed to the promotion"), some say "helped promote" (again almost anything: Template:User Good Articles uses this, while Template:User Good Article Significant "significantly contributed to the promotion", which seems to indicate having done more). We might want to consider having two, both including the option to give a number: one with "written or significantly contributed to" for significant contributors, and one with "contributed to or helped promote" for those who helped but not in a major way. If this makes sense, then I'd suggest merging Template:User GAw, Template:User good articles 2, Template:User GAarticleswritten, and Template:User Good Article Significant into a one template with wording like the first two in this list, and the rest (including Template:User Good Articles) into Template:User Good Articles2, with its wording and perhaps the option to adjust "contributed" to something else. Is there any way to combine all of these requests into one so we can consider them as a group? BlueMoonset (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC) * that can usually be successfully hashed out post-TfD, pre-implementation. On the TfDs where a target isn't clear yet, you can express your preference as a comment. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Template:User Good Article Significant The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User Good Article. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:User Good Article Significant with Template:User Good Article. * User Good Article Significant * User Good Article A large number of duplicate userboxes exist with pretty much the same function and appearance. It would be easier to have a single userbox for this usage case. A parameter that decides what is used for the word "written", and the ability to insert the number of good articles, means that lots of templates can be rolled into a single template with a simple name and unified formatting. This will also stop the gradual proliferation of more infoboxes as new boxes won't have to be created for every variation on the word "written" ("contributed", "added significantly to" etc). Tom (LT) (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Support per WP:CONSOLIDATION. But, would you mind combining these nominations into a single section? {{u\| Sdkb }}  talk 04:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * , WP:CONSOLIDATION is about infoboxes, but there is WP:WPUBX for userboxes. +1 for combining the discussion sections. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * , thanks for the link. Perhaps we need to consolidate our consolidation essays, eh? {{u\| Sdkb }}  talk 23:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Support. No need for dozens of templates, where one can achieve the same result. I'm not even sure there needs to be a parameter for every variation of the word. "Contributed" can cover that all. --Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC) * Support per nom. Jason Quinn (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)	WIKI
User:Paresh4000 Hii, I am Paresh Vijaywargiya The Owner Of Vinayak Photocopy & Computer Center. Our kiosk can give many of the online services and all types of online forms can be filled at my kiosk. I have Two Kiosks Digital Seva Kiosk & Mponline Kiosk.	WIKI
Watch These Emerging Market ETFs in Q2 - ETF News And Commentary The emerging markets regained their sheen as the Fed cut the U.S. economic growth forecasts for this year and the next. Even after the Fed removed its 'patient' stance on the rate hiking issue, a depressed inflationary backdrop held it back from taking this key decision. Further, the apex bank seeks more stabilization in the labor market. All these translated into a strong possibility of a delayed rate hike which in turn weighed on the greenback. Market experts see the timeline of the first Fed rate hike after 2006 being deferred and expect Q2 of 2015 to be another quarter of easy money in the U.S. This pushed up the emerging markets space as EM equities found a reason to rejoice. This is especially true as the ultra-popular Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF ( VWO ) has gained nearly 2.5% in the last ten trading sessions (as of March 27, 2015) and the Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) has added about 2.8% during the same frame suggesting investors' hunger for higher yields. On the other hand, SPDR S&P 500 ETF ( SPY ) has added about 0.4% (as of March 27, 2015). Emerging markets have long been investors' favorites due to their high growth potential, rapid pace of industrialization and urbanization as well as high interest rates. However, given the apprehensions of Fed tightening, emerging market currencies were badly hurt on a stronger dollar and commodity weakness. Now that the scenario might change in the coming quarter, the emerging market space could be a bright spot to play. Per Nomura , a further ascent in the greenback will hurt U.S. exports and leave an adverse impact on the overall GDP. This in turn will hold back the Fed from tightening, "'which has potential to stall the dollar rally." Nomura also added that "EM growth expectations are now so low that the potential for upside surprises is bigger." The favorable trend will be more pronounced for the energy importing countries. Nomura further noted that "hard currency EM debts are generally manageable at the country level." Per the research house, despite the slowdown of hard currency debt issuances, each country has not seen the same degree of deceleration (read: Emerging Market ETFs in Trouble on Stronger Dollar? ). All these point toward lesser turbulence, and probably a rally in the emerging market space in the upcoming quarter. While the broad emerging market space has rewarded handsome returns after the Fed meet in March, some specific products could be taken into consideration in Q2. Let's take a look at the three top performing (lately) broad emerging market ETFs (read: 4 Buy Ranked Emerging Markets ETFs in Focus ). MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Dividend ETF (QDEM) The $4.8 million product tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets High Dividend Yield Index giving exposure to a basket of high yield stocks domiciled in emerging markets. The product looks to hold about 158 stocks with this approach. China (36.7%), South Africa (13.9%), Taiwan (11.3%) and Russia (9.9%) are some of the countries getting increased exposure. QDEM was up 3.9% in the last ten trading sessions (as of March 27, 2015) and yields about 4.18% in annual dividend. The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a Medium risk outlook. SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Mix ETF ( QEMM ) This fund follows the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Mix Index, holding a large basket of 605 stocks. It has amassed $73.8 million and charges a low fee of 30 bps per annum. The fund provides higher diversification benefits and is well spread out across various components. Each firm holds less than 4% of assets. Further, the top sector - financials - account for 24.5% of assets while information technology (21.5%), telecom (10.5%) and consumer staples (9.8%) make up for a nice mix. The fund charges 30 bps in fees. The fund was up 3.7% in the last ten trading sessions (as of March 27, 2015). The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold). SPDR MSCI EM 50 ETF (EMFT) This fund has amassed about $2.3 million in assets. It is tilted toward China (34%), South Korea (19.73%) and Taiwan (15.11%). As far as sector diversification is concerned, the fund is tilted toward Information Technology (31.52%) and Financials (30.18%). The fund gained about 2.2% in the last ten trading sessions (as of March 27, 2015). Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days . Click to get this free report >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report MKT VEC-MS EMQD (QDEM): ETF Research Reports SPDR-EM QM (QEMM): ETF Research Reports SPDR-M EM 50 (EMFT): ETF Research Reports SPDR-SP 500 TR (SPY): ETF Research Reports VANGD-FTSE EM (VWO): ETF Research Reports WISDMTR-EM EQ I (DEM): ETF Research Reports To read this article on Zacks.com click here. Zacks Investment Research Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc. The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
CaltechTHESIS A Caltech Library Service Stratified inertial flow in the Gulf Stream Citation Blandford, Robert Roy (1964) Stratified inertial flow in the Gulf Stream. Dissertation (Ph.D.), California Institute of Technology. doi:10.7907/JSQN-6Y34. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-10142002-113121 Abstract Earlier theoretical models of the Gulf Stream have treated the motion of a single fluid layer of constant density and vertically uniform flow velocity. As a step toward models with continuous stratification, the present work analyses inviscid, steady-state, purely inertial flow using two moving layers of different density and velocity. The first type of Gulf Stream model analysed consists of two layers of different densities flowing over a denser layer at rest (baroclinic model). The second has two layers of different densities flowing over a rigid, horizontal bottom (mixed barotropic-baroclinic model). In both models there exist, at any latitude, either 0, 2, or 4 theoretical solutions to the flow problem. Only one such solution, however, is realistic and satisfies the boundary condition of vanishing northward velocity at the southern latitude boundary of the flow region considered. This is called the correct solution, while the others are called incorrect solutions. As the parameters of the two-layer models converge to limiting values corresponding to one-layer models (for example, vanishing density difference between the upper and lower layers), the solutions may or may not converge to the one-layer solutions. If a correct solution converges uniformly, the limit is called a correct limit. If convergence is non-uniform at some value of the latitude coordinate, the limit is called an incorrect limit. If no solutions exist as the limit is approached, it is an impossible limit. The most important limits discussed are as follows: 1. As the density contrast between the upper and lower moving layers becomes large in a baroclinic model for which the upper layer increases in thickness with latitude in the interior of the ocean to the east of the stream, the upper layer goes, via a correct limit, to the one-layer baroclinic model. 2. As the density contrast between the upper and lower layers becomes small in a baroclinic model, the solution for the sum of the two layers converges, via an incorrect limit, to the one-layer baroclinic model. 3. As the thickness of the upper layer becomes small while the density difference across it remains proportional to the thickness (a constant density "gradient" in the upper layer), the range of latitude over which there exists a correct solution tends to zero. The incorrect solution goes to the one-layer model via an incorrect limit. This result suggests that continuously stratified, purely inertial models of the Gulf Stream are impossible for finite density gradients. 4. In the limit as the interface between the lower moving layer and the resting layer becomes horizontal, the lower layer velocity goes to zero. No solution exists as the limit is approached. It is an impossible limit. 5. As the density contrast between the upper and lower layer becomes small in the barotropic-baroclinic model, the solution goes via a correct limit to the homogeneous barotropic model. In an attempt to model the actual Gulf Stream, parameters are selected for a model of two moving layers, the upper about 600 meters thick and the lower about 400 meters. This model is close to the impossible limit of 4. above, and no solution exists. The physical reason for this is that because of the small transport in the lower layer, the velocity in the lower layer must be small, which is incompatible with the large velocity gradient needed for conservation of potential vorticity as required in an inertial model. It therefore seems questionable that the deeper waters of the Gulf Stream can be modelled by a purely inertial theory. No off-shore countercurrents can be found, despite fairly accurate modelling of boundary conditions which might be expected to give them. The general implication of this work is that steady, purely inertial models are inadequate to describe even the lower latitude growth region of Gulf Stream if density stratification is taken into account, and that viscosity or unsteadiness must therefore be introduced. Item Type:Thesis (Dissertation (Ph.D.)) Degree Grantor:California Institute of Technology Division:Geological and Planetary Sciences Major Option:Geological and Planetary Sciences Thesis Availability:Public (worldwide access) Research Advisor(s): • Unknown, Unknown Thesis Committee: • Unknown, Unknown Defense Date:11 May 1964 Record Number:CaltechETD:etd-10142002-113121 Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-10142002-113121 DOI:10.7907/JSQN-6Y34 Default Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided. ID Code:4078 Collection:CaltechTHESIS Deposited By: Imported from ETD-db Deposited On:15 Oct 2002 Last Modified:21 Dec 2019 03:52 Thesis Files [img] Preview PDF (Blandford_rr_1964.pdf) - Final Version See Usage Policy. 7MB Repository Staff Only: item control page	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
1969 San Diego Chargers season The 1969 San Diego Chargers season was the team's tenth as a franchise and their ninth in San Diego. It began with the team trying to improve on their 9–5 record in 1968, as this would be the last season for the team with a winning record until 1978. It was the last American Football League season before the AFL–NFL merger. It was also Sid Gillman's final season as the team's head coach, as he resigned due to poor health in the middle of the season, and Charlie Waller took over for the last five games.	WIKI
Risk of maritime introduction of plague from Madagascar to Mayotte Publié le 1 Novembre 2018 Mis à jour le 5 juillet 2019 Plague is a rodent-borne disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Most human infections are bubonic plague, as a result of being bitten by infected rodent fleas. Madagascar, Democratic Republic of Congo and Peru are the three most affected countries. Plague was introduced into eastern Madagascar in 1898 by boat from India. It is estimated that the risk of introduction of plague from Madagascar to neighboring islands is very high due to the maritime links. We conducted a study of plague reservoirs and vectors in Longoni Port in Mayotte and Mahajanga Port in Madagascar during two seasons to highlight a non-negligible risk of introduction of Y. pestis to Mayotte. The results showed that two main reservoirs of plague in Madagascar Suncus murinus and Rattus rattus and the main flea vector Xenopsylla cheopis exists in and surrounding the port of Longoni. Y. pestis was isolated from Rattus norvegicus captured close to the port of Mahajanga during this study. Plague bacteria circulate within populations of rodent without causing rodent die-off in Mahajanga. The risk of introduction of plague from Madagascar to Mayotte exists due to the regular exchanges. Continuous surveillance of rat, shrew and flea populations is therefore necessary in all the surrounding countries that have regular exchanges with Madagascar to prevent the spread of the plague. Auteur : Rahelinirina Soanandrasana, Harimalala Mireille, Margueron Thomas, Ramihangihajason Tojo, Mansotte François, Rajerison Minoarisoa, Pagès Fréderic, Boyer Sébastien Acta Tropica, 2018, vol. 187, p. 140-143	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Page:The World's Famous Orations Volume 10.djvu/92 THE WORLD'S FAMOUS ORATIONS standing reverently where they stood and fought and died, to swear before God and each other, in the words of him upon whom in our day the spirit of the revolutionary fathers visibly descended, that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. This ancient town with its neighbors who share its glory, has never failed fitly to com- memorate this great day of its history. Fifty years ago, while some soldiers of the Concord fight were yet living — twenty-five years ago, while still a few venerable survivors lingered — with prayer and eloquence and song you re- newed the pious vow. But the last living link with the Revolution has long been broken. Great events and a mightier struggle have absorbed our own generation. Yet we who stand here to-day have a sympathy with the men at the old North Bridge which those who preceded us here at earlier celebrations could not know. With them war was a name and a tradition. So swift and vast had been the change and the development of the country that the revolutionary clash of arms was already vague and unreal, and Concord and Lexington seemed to them almost as remote and historic as Arbela and Sempach. When they assembled to celebrate this day they saw a little group of tottering forms, eyes from which the light was fading, arms nerveless and with- ered, thin white hairs that fluttered in the wind — they saw a few venerable relics of a van- 6G ��	WIKI
Talk:I Got a Boy Official Cover Art What is it? On the Melon music site the cover doesn't match what is currently displayed — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 08:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC) * The itunes version is the same as this. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 11:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC) * What makes the Itunes version more official than Melon, a provider in their official country? — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC) * The cover on the article is the correct one. The one that seems to be used in a few other places is actually the single cover which is on the song's page; MelOn also seems to be using this cover over the actual album one. Herro Link 03:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC) * Yep I saw it as well, the single cover was used instead of the album cover in some sites. This page and the itunes one are the same and the correct one. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 06:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Composition section. Talk That, or Boomerang was recorded as a Korean song first why does that section fail to mention this? This song was recorded in 2008, and was supposed to be promoted instead of Gee. This song was leaked last year in the internet, with a screenshot of Dancing Queen MV. Why does this article fail to mention this? I mentioned that it was recorded in 2008, and a Japanese version was added in their 2nd Japanese album, below the tracklist. I think it should be mentioned in the composition section as well. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 06:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Time Magazine This song got onto the TIME. Not sure if you can meld this ref into somewhere. Dengero (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC) Album charts I'm just questioning the value of the Hanteo charts, considering that the Gaon charts already encompasses their sales. Just asking for some thoughts on whether it is worth listing. Also, I'm looking to clean up the Taiwan charts, seeing as there are 5 different charts. I'm just wondering which one is the national chart, or are they lacking one? From my own knowledge, G-Music is the most accurate... Need your thoughts K, thanks Flarepik (talk) 11:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC) * I did a bit of research and I found that Hanteo is definitely encompassed within the Gaon values, so I'm considering removing that part entirely. Also, it turns out that many people in Taiwan favour the G-Music charts. I will be cleaning that up if there are no objections. Flarepik (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC) Credits Jessica and Tiffany are mentioned as songwriters. Does that refer to "Rap making by Tiffany & Jessica" in the credits for "Dancing Queen"? Just need the verification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC) * Yes Flarepik (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Proposed merge with Promise (Girls' Generation song) Although this song charted, it is not notable enough for a standalone article (See WP:NSONG). Per WP:SONGS, most songs do not merit an article and "A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". What little info is here will fit in the album article. Random86 (talk) 04:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC) * Support Per WP:NSONGS. HĐ (talk) 08:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Oppose. I got a boy can stand on it's own, and has for a long time. It was the song that won the Youtube Music Awards in the most popular section.--Yenamare (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Promise has nothing to do with "I Got a Boy" song. HĐ (talk) 07:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Exactly, so why is it being asked to merge with it?, that's why I oppose * Support: We are proposing to merge both "Promise" and "Romantic St" to the I Got A Boy album article, not the song article.--TerryAlex (talk) 07:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC) Proposed merge with Romantic St. Like "Promise", this song is not notable enough for a standalone article. The relevant information can fit in the album article. Random86 (talk) 05:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC) * Support Per WP:NSONGS. HĐ (talk) 08:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC) * Oppose, that song has nothing to do with IGAB except for the fact that it's the same artist. --Yenamare (talk) 07:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Yenamare is indef-blocked. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC) * I Got a Boy is the song's parent album. Your reasons are just plain ridiculous. HĐ (talk) 07:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Support: same reason as above--TerryAlex (talk) 07:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * @TerryAlex, @HĐ Why should it be merged? There are people reading the article, and people creating them. Where is wikipedia's rule for notability? What's a reference for that? How do you know if you're not just being biased? '''OPPOSE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yenamare (talk • contribs) 08:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * You can see it here. We are completely neutral and follow the rules of Wikipedia. HĐ (talk) 09:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * @HĐ That is a talk page, project page, that's not a rule, that's what you think, or want it to be. Anyone can edit that page, it's not protected and endorsed my wikipedia management, you're another normal person like me, and your choice to just delete it and merge is biased OPPOSE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yenamare (talk • contribs) 09:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * No, it is based upon Wikipedia's rules and is created by the administrators. You are a newcomer, so please stop SHOUTING as you are the one that is being biased. HĐ (talk) 11:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * @HĐ Anyone can be an "administrator", they just have to be registered long enough and edit a lot of articles, or be voted as one by others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yenamare (talk • contribs) 11:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * You sure don't know how Wikipedia works. Stop making nonsense excuses. HĐ (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * @HĐ well then pray tell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yenamare (talk • contribs) 11:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Please read WP:NSONGS. Your argument does not make any sense. Thanks.--TerryAlex (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * @TerryAlex, HĐ that does sound more convincing. But I just don't see why you have to delete the page, instead of improving it. It probably can stand on it's own. By just deleting it, you're basically stopping anyone who might have the time and passion for expanding the article, from expanding it. It's as if you "don't" want people to extend the articles. Just put a note that it needs more information like many incomplete wikipages do, surely someone will get to it. Also, if there needs to be a consensus on this subject, and your goal is to delete the stand alone and merge some info to IGAB, I still "oppose". There's something about how pushy you are for deletion, and "your argument doesn't make sense", is not an argument, at least try to have a conversation.--Yenamare (talk) 16:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Can we all realize that 99% of Kpop songs don't have that kind of in-depth coverage? Most of the info is only for PR purposes. Those two songs have never been at all notable to have their stand-alone articles. Thanks.--TerryAlex (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Now that we know Yenamare is a sockpuppet of Kazandre this makes more sense. Random86 (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC) * Support merge. Not notable in its own right. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)	WIKI
Arthur Wakefield Captain Arthur Wakefield (19 November 1799 – 17 June 1843) served with the Royal Navy before joining his brother, Edward Gibbon Wakefield, in founding the New Zealand Company settlement of Nelson in New Zealand. Early life Arthur Wakefield was born in Essex, England, a son of Edward Wakefield (1774–1854), a distinguished surveyor and land agent, and Susanna Crash (1767–1816). His grandmother, Priscilla Wakefield (1751–1832), was a popular author for the young, and one of the introducers of savings banks. He was the brother of Catherine Gurney Wakefield (1793–1873), Edward Gibbon Wakefield (1796–1862), Daniel Bell Wakefield (1798–1858), William Hayward Wakefield (1801–1848), John Howard Wakefield (1803–1862), Felix Wakefield (1807–1875), Priscilla Susannah Wakefield (1809–1887), Percy Wakefield (1810–1832), and an unnamed child born in 1813. Royal Navy Wakefield joined the Royal Navy at age eleven. He saw action in the Dutch East Indies, and was part of the force that captured and burnt Washington, D.C. during the War of 1812. He took part in the bombardment of Algiers in 1816. In the post-Napoleonic period he was stationed off South America, involved in diplomatic duties during the various wars of independence. He then spent several years off the coast of West Africa as part of the flotilla engaged in the suppression of the slave trade. He also saw duty in the North Atlantic, the West Indies and the Mediterranean Sea. He was eventually given command of his own ship, HM steam frigate HMS Rhadamanthus (1832). However, in 1837 he was passed over for promotion, so, recognising that his career was going nowhere, he resigned from the Navy in 1841. New Zealand Company Immediately after Arthur Wakefield left the Navy in 1841, his brother, Edward Gibbon Wakefield recruited him to join the New Zealand Company, tasking him to select settlers for a new settlement to be named Nelson, escort the party to New Zealand, and supervise the growth of the new town. Arthur Wakefield sailed from London on the Whitby in April 1841 and reached Wellington in September 1841. The first immigrant ships arrived in Nelson in February 1842. The settlement of Nelson got off to a good start. In the first two years, 18 ships transported more than 3,000 colonists. Captain Wakefield actively worked to promote the orderly development of the colony. Although he seems to have been rather paternal in his attitude to the settlers, he also seems to have been respected and admired. However, the new colony encountered serious difficulties in subsequent months. The biggest problem was the lack of arable land. The New Zealand Company, and particularly Wakefield's brother, had made extravagant promises to the settlers about the availability of land. Each settler family had been offered 1 acre (4,000 m²) of urban land, 50 acres (200,000 m²) of suburban land, and 150 acres (600,000 m²) of rural land. However, the company had nothing like that amount of land available and the existing owners—the native Māori—proved very reluctant to sell their land and not inclined to trust the New Zealand Company's promises. Furthermore, the newly established colonial government, under Governor William Hobson in Auckland, was not at all sympathetic to their problems. One of the basic tenets of the Treaty of Waitangi (1840), between the British Crown and various Māori chiefs, was the understanding that the Crown would protect Māori from attempts to defraud them of their land. On the other hand, some members of the New Zealand Company and many of the settlers saw Māori as ignorant savages who had no right to stand in the way of honest British colonists. This was a period when the growing British Empire was very aware of what it saw as its manifest destiny, to rule the native peoples of the world. The British colonists believed they were owed the land, and resented the fact that their survival was dependent on the goodwill of Māori, who held all the power. In summary, Arthur Wakefield found he had far more settlers than he had land for and they were not happy. For once, Edward Gibbon Wakefield urged caution, but he was in London and his brother Arthur was the man on the spot. Death The Chief Magistrate in Nelson, Henry Thompson, was a very hot-tempered, arrogant man who was not prepared to accept that the Nelson settlement did not own and control the Wairau Plains. Te Rauparaha and Te Rangihaeata visited Nelson and made it very clear that they would not allow the settlers to occupy the Wairau Plain. Despite that, Wakefield and Thompson sent out surveyors. The Māori very firmly, but without violence, escorted them off their land and burnt down their hut. Thompson immediately issued a warrant for the arrest of the two chiefs on a charge of arson. He and Wakefield then recruited a group of special constables and led them off to carry out the arrest. The result was the Wairau Affray, in which Arthur Wakefield and 21 other of the party were killed by the Māori. It is difficult to apportion the blame for this disaster. Henry Thompson appears to have been the driving force behind the attempt to arrest Te Rauparaha and he already had a reputation for headstrong, irrational impulses. But Wakefield was supposed to be in command of the settlement. His brother had told him that the claim to the land was invalid. It seems that he yielded to the pressures and expectations of the people around him and particularly to Thompson. It is still unknown as to what initiated the incident at Wairau yet Wakefield, Thompson and seven other settlers surrendered during the clash and were summarily executed on the orders of Chief Te Rangihaeata who was enraged and demanded utu (revenge) for the death of his wife Rongo, Te Rauparaha's daughter, who had been shot in the affray. It is claimed that his head was laid on a loaf of bread as a final insult, echoing his arrogant quote that he could buy the Maori with "sugar and bread". The subsequent government inquiry found the whole expedition had been illegal and exonerated the Māori. This did not sit well with the colonists, who immediately began a political campaign against Governor Robert FitzRoy that contributed to his early recall. Commemoration Nelson is now a thriving city. The community of Wakefield south of Nelson is not believed to be named after him, but it was renamed shortly before his death. The Wairau Affray is believed to have assisted in the new name becoming established. The Arthur Range in what is now Kahurangi National Park was explored by Arthur Dudley Dobson, and the range and Mount Arthur were named by Dobson after Arthur Wakefield.	WIKI
-- Sky Deutschland Slides After Announcing BaFin Finds Flaws in Statements Sky Deutschland AG , the pay- television operator controlled by Rupert Murdoch ’s News Corp., fell the most since Nov. 2 after the German financial regulator said some of its past trading statements were flawed. Sky Deutschland shares closed 5.9 percent lower at 1.47 euros in Frankfurt trading. Late yesterday, the Unterfoehring, Germany-based business said financial regulator BaFin had found irregularities in the unprofitable company’s statements for 2007 and the first half of 2008 that could result in fines or claims for damages. While the implications of the BaFin charges remain unclear, it is “another drop in the bucket for people to say it’s not worth it,” said Boris Boehm , who helps manage about 1 billion euros ($1.35 billion) at Aramea Asset Management in Hamburg. News Corp., which also owns a controlling stake in British Sky Broadcasting Plc and Sky Italia in Europe, bought a 14.6 percent stake in January, 2008 in the German company that was then called Premiere AG. The New York-based media group now owns 49.9 percent of Sky Deutschland, which listed on the Frankfurt bourse in March, 2005. Sky Deutschland yesterday said the regulator’s claims are “inapplicable” and will be legally reviewed, and have no immediate effect on its balance sheet. The company is in the midst of a turnaround plan under Chief Executive Officer Brian Sullivan . It has a “long way to go” before becoming profitable, Sullivan said at a conference in Barcelona last week. Accounting Norms On Aug. 2, the company, which posted a loss in 2009, said it expects a loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization in 2010 and that although 2011 will be “significantly better,” it “will still remain negative.” According to BaFin, the pay-TV operator overstated profit as a result of incorrect accounting for the purchase of World Cup soccer broadcast rights and didn’t sufficiently point out credit risks. At the end of 2007, the company’s value was overstated by 248.4 million euros because of inaccurate accounting for some acquisitions, the regulator said. Sky Deutschland currently owns the broadcast rights for games in the Bundesliga, Germany’s first-tier soccer division, though not over Internet TV or on mobile devices, where Deutsche Telekom AG owns the rights. To contact the reporters on this story: Sarah Rabil in New York at srabil@bloomberg.net ; To contact the reporter on this story: Matthew Campbell in Paris at mcampbell39@bloomberg.net . To contact the editor responsible for this story: Vidya Root at vroot@bloomberg.net .	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Limited access Upgrade to access all content for this subject Consider the following two classes. public class Arithmetic1 { public int performMath(int num) { return num + multiplyNums(num); } public int multiplyNums(int num) { return num2; } public int divideNums(int num1, int num2) { return num1 / num2; } } public class Arithmetic2 extends Arithmetic1 { public int performMath(int num) { return super.performMath(num); } public int multiplyNums(int num) { return num10; } } What would the following code segment from a client class print to the console? Arithmetic1 math1 = new Arithmetic1(); Arithmetic2 math2 = new Arithmetic2(); System.out.println(math1.performMath(20) + math2.performMath(10)); A 90 B 170 C 330 D 140 E 60 Select an assignment template	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Page:Mexico in revolution (IA mexicoinrevoluti00blas).pdf/19 AM just back from Mexico, where I spent a month and a half. In this brief period of time I made the acquaintance of a Government that looked strong and seemed destined to reach the end of its constitutional days peacefully; I witnessed the outbreak of a revolution that in its early stages led a languid life; I saw the decisive triumph of this revolution, brought about by the unexpected assistance of political elements that had seemed out of sympathy with it; and I observed, finally, the flight of President Carranza, the present uncertainty regarding the probably future of the new Government in process of formation. After all, there is nothing extraordinary in this vertiginous movement of events. Of all things Mexican, revolutions move with the greatest velocity.	WIKI
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of birthday songs Hey how come you would list this at DRV without telling anyone? Benefix (talk) 14:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC) And how come you would also relist this at AFD without telling anyone? Benefix (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)	WIKI
Call for Abstract Womenhealth cong-2021, will be organized around the theme “” Womenhealth cong-2021 is comprised of keynote and speakers sessions on latest cutting edge research designed to offer comprehensive global discussions that address current issues in Womenhealth cong-2021 Submit your abstract to any of the mentioned tracks. Register now for the conference by choosing an appropriate package suitable to you. Women's health has been a long concern but nowadays it has reached a supreme point of concern. Generally men and women share comparative health challenges; only dissimilarity is that the health of women merits specific consideration. Frequently treated as just Women’s' regenerative health, numerous gatherings contend for a more extensive definition relating to the general health of Women’s, better communicated as "The health of Women’s". Gynaecology manages any disease concerning the conceptive organs; uterus, fallopian tubes, cervix, ovaries and vagina. A gynaecologist may likewise treat related issues in the inside, bladder and urinary framework since these are firmly identified with female conceptive organs. Obstetrics manages the consideration of the pregnant ladies, the unborn infant, work and conveyance and the prompt time frame following labour. The obstetrician guarantees that mother and youngster get the best pre-birth care to guarantee work and conveyance is cultivated without inconveniences and that should mediation be required, it is done rapidly and securely. The act of co-ordinating and running all parts of a surgical suite to accomplish a defined set of goals. A most crucial field, operating room management is increasingly studied as how to best: 1) Ensure patient safety and optimal patient outcome, 2) provide surgeons with appropriate access to the OR so that patients can have operations in a timely manner, 3) maximize the efficiency of operating room utilization, staff, and materials, 4) Decrease patient delays, 5) Enhance satisfaction among patients, staff, and surgeons. Obstetrics is the field of study concentrated on pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. As a medical specialty, obstetrics is combined with gynaecology under the discipline known as obstetrics and gynaecology (OB/GYN) which is a surgical field. Obstetrical anaesthesia presents unique challenges. Labour begins without warning, and anaesthesia may be required within minutes of a full meal. Vomiting with aspiration of gastric contents is a constant threat. The usual physiological adaptations of pregnancy require special consideration, especially with disorders such as preeclampsia, placental abruption, or sepsis syndrome. Although hysterectomy is an effective treatment for menorrhagia, the appropriate use of medical treatment, the progestogen releasing intrauterine system, and hysteroscopic endometrial surgery should offer successful treatment for most women Large uterine fibroids can be managed conservatively with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue therapy or embolization of the uterine arteries Pregnancy care consists of prenatal (before birth) and postpartum (after birth) healthcare for expectant mothers. It involves treatments and trainings to ensure a healthy prepregnancy, pregnancy, and labour and delivery for mom and baby. Gynecologic oncology is a particular field of medical science that centers on tumors of the female genitalia. In the United States, 82,000 ladies were diagnosed with gynaecologic malignancy yearly. In 2013, an expected 91,730 were reported. • Ovarian Cancer • Endometrial Cancer • Vaginal Cancer • Cervical Cancer • Breast Cancer • Medication and monitoring Ladies have special wellbeing related issue. Novel heath issues incorporate pregnancy, menopause, and states of the female organs. Ladies can have a sound pregnancy by getting appropriate, early and ordinary pre-birth care. They are additionally prescribed a few tests for cervical cancer, breast disease and bone thickness screenings. Complexities of pregnancy incorporate medical issues that happen amid pregnancy. They can include child's wellbeing, mother's wellbeing or both. Gynecological Endocrinology centers around the treatment of diseases related to the menstrual cycle and fertility. Reproductive endocrinology and Fetal-Placental neuroendocrine refers to a subspecialty that centers on the organic causes and its interventional treatment of infertility and its advancement. It is identified with the control and functioning of the distinctive endocrine organs in women, the impact of reproductive actions on the endocrine system, and the outcomes of endocrine disorders on reproduction. • Fetal-Placental Neuroendocrine Development • Paediatric and Adolescent Gynaecology • Neuroendocrinology of Reproduction • Reproductive Endocrinology Infertility implies not having the capacity to get pregnant. Ladies who can get pregnant yet are unfit to remain pregnant are also considered as infertile. Around 10 percent of ladies (6.1 million) in the United States age 15-44 experience issues getting pregnant or remaining pregnant, as per the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Most instances of female infertility are due to issues with ovulation. Without ovulation, there are no eggs to be prepared. A few signs that a lady isn't ovulating regularly incorporate unpredictable or missing periods. Ovulation issues are frequently brought about by polycystic ovarian disorder (PCOS). PCOS is a hormonal issue which can interfere with ovulation. PCOS is the most widely recognized reason for female infertility. Essential ovarian deficiency (POI) is another reason for ovulation issues. POI happens when a lady's ovaries quit working ordinarily before she is 40. POI isn't equivalent to early menopause. • In Vitro Fertilization • Infertility Evaluation and Treatment among Women • Tubal Infertility and Ectopic Pregnancy • Obesity & Surgical Management of Infertility • Artificial Gametes and Ovarian Stimulation • Risk of Idiopathic Male Infertility • Infertility Evaluation and Management Most ladies with bosom disease will have some kind of medical procedure to expel the tumour. Contingent upon the kind of bosom growth and how exceptional it is, you may require different sorts of treatment too, either previously or after medical procedure, or here and there both. Typically, treatment designs depend on the sort of bosom malignancy, its stage, and any extraordinary situations. The American Cancer Society likewise has projects and administrations – including rides to treatment, hotel, and that's just the beginning – to enable you to get past treatment. Your tumor mind group will be your first wellspring of data and support, however there are numerous spots you can get more help on the off chance that you require it. Doctor's facility or center based help administrations are an essential piece of your care. These might incorporate medical attendant or social work administrations, budgetary guide, wholesome exhortation, recovery, or profound help. Contaminations in the female genitalia and the extra sex organs are regularly known as Gynecologic Infectious Diseases. While a portion of these ailments can be cured effectively by the use of anti-infection agents while others should be given careful consideration while curing them. A portion of the irresistible infections are Vulvovaginitis, Cervicitis, Pelvic Inflammatory Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Gynecologic Oncology is a specific field that arrangements with growths relating to the female genitalia and conceptive framework. Ovarian malignancy, uterine disease, vaginal growth, cervical tumor and vulvar disease are each of the pieces of gynaecologic oncology. As indicated by the information gathered by The Society of Gynecologic Oncology 82,000 ladies in the United States were influenced by gynaecologic malignancy every year. The technology which is used to achieve pregnancy artificially is known as the assisted reproductive technology. Assisted reproductive technology includes procedures namely fertility medication, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and surrogacy. ART is primarily used in treating infertility among couples. It belongs mainly to the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. ART includes many techniques such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI), cryopreservation, transvaginal ovum retrival, embryo transfer, assisted zona hatching, autologous endometrial co-culture, zygote intrafallopian transfer, cytoplasmic transfer, egg donors, sperm donors, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, emryo splitting, GIFT, ZIFT, sex selection and surgical sperm retrival. All these methods are being widely used as problems of infertility are increasing at an alarming rate worldwide. While some of these methods are safe but majority of them are harmful to the fetus as the babies are born with some kind of birth defects or genetic defects. ART also carries the risk of heterotopic pregnancy. In IVF and ICSI babies are born with low birth weight, decreased expression of proteins in energy metabolism, visual impairment and cerebral palsy. ART procedures in the United States have doubled in the last 10years with the cost ranging from $2,000 to $30,000. ART procedures should be only performed after examing the medical condition of the couple. Many a times ART proves to be harmful to both the mother and child. Breast Cancer and its treatment may influence your physical working and vitality. For example, numerous bosom tumor medications diminish estrogen in the body, which may diminish bone thickness. Exercise might be utilized to advance bone thickness and help bring down the danger of bosom tumor repeat. Exercise may likewise enable you to oversee treatment-related exhaustion, particularly amid radiation treatments.oncology restoration group is accessible to enable you to beat physical deficiencies, manufacture quality, diminish agony and battle fatigue.oncology recovery specialists are accessible to work with your careful oncologist to enable you to avoid or decrease lymphedema by utilizing waste systems, extending activities and back rubs. All through your Breast Cancer treatment, recovery specialists will be accessible to work with you and alternate individuals from your care group to help enhance your physical working and feeling of prosperity. Recovery group additionally gives an instructive part to enable you to comprehend the physical and mental advantages of physical rebuilding, and to help plan you and your family to continuing the program at home.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Category Archives: Linux Default Virtual Host in Apache If you have multiple domains installed in a virtual host configuration with one IP address in Apache, the IP address may not resolve to the domain you prefer. Let me explain. For example, you have the following domains running on an Ubuntu Server with one IP address. abc.com cde.com klm.com xyz.com All the domains are resolving as expected on the browser. However, if you type the IP address on the browser, it only defaults to the first domain found in the /etc/apache2/sites-available directory, which is most likely abc.com. If you want the IP address to default to another domain, such as klm.com for example, you will need to edit the /etc/apache2/httpd.conf file and add the following entries. <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName www.klm.com ServerAlias klm.com DocumentRoot /var/www/klm.com/www </VirtualHost> Those are the only entries you’ll need. Typing the IP address on the browser will now default to the contents of klm.com. All the other domains are still accessible via domain names on the browser. Owncloud 4.5 OwnCloud is an open-source file sharing and file storage cloud platform that’s similar to Dropbox, Google Drive, Box, and other cloud sharing services. The difference is, OwnCloud allows you to install your own cloud storage on your own server. You manage the server software yourself making your data your own. OwnCloud has vastly improved the past year. OwnCloud has added a desktop client for Windows, MacOS and Linux, as well as mobile apps for iOS and Android. Much has changed since the last time I played around with OwnCloud. Instead of performing an upgrade of my previous installation, I’ve decided to just reinstall everything from scratch. OwnCloud now gives your three options to install the server software. You can install it from a tar archive, a Linux package, or you can use the Web Installer. I chose the latter. It turned out to be the simplest option. You simply download the small installation file called “setup-owncloud.php.” You then upload the it to your web server and run the install script. You will be asked to supply a username and password. The installation file will then download the rest of the program and complete the installation for you. It takes less than a minute to complete the install. Just a couple of things worth sharing. I opted for SQLite install. So, there is no MySQL database needed. There’s only one thing I want to modify. I want increase the default allocated space to something bigger. Other than that, it’s a functional file sharing service. It’s not as polished as Dropbox and Google Drive, but it’s not too shabby either. At least, you can sleep well knowing your data is your own. Linux Steam Gaining Momentum Valve released Steam For Linux several weeks ago making it possible for Linux gamers to play games on the Linux platform. Initially 57 games were available on Linux steam. To entice gamers to play on the Linux platform, Valve offered steep discounts ranging from 50-75% off the normal price. Counter Strike is available for $4.99 and Half-Life for just $2.49. It gets better. Team Fortress is totally free. Interestingly enough, Linux Today reported today that Linux Steam accounts to about 2 percent of the users at Steam. Not bad considering that Mac users are at 3 percent, and Mac Steam has been around since 2010. If you want to give Linux Steam a try, just download and install Linux. Choose any of these popular distributions: Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora or everyone’s favorite distro at this moment, Linux Mint. Choosing a Desktop Environment on Linux Mint Linux Mint has four desktop environments that you can choose from. There is KDE, Xfce, Cinnamon and Mate. The two most common choices by users are Cinnamon and Mate. Technically, you can download any of the desktop environments and change them later. If you decide to go with Mate and later on want to install Cinnamon, the change is going to be easy. You just need 400MB of extra disk space, which is practically nothing judging on the size of hard drives nowadays. The only other decision to make is to whether include multimedia effects or leave them out. My preference is to include them. Let’s say you’ve decided to go with Mate and want to install Cinnamon later on. Changing from Mate to Cinnamon is quite easy. All you have to do is install Cinnamon via the Terminal which is my preference. You can easily do the same using a GUI package manager. From Mate to Cinnamon $ sudo apt-get install mint-meta-cinnamon From Cinnamon to Mate $ sudo apt-get install mint-meta-mate Once you’ve made the change. You need to log out of the current desktop environment and log in again and making sure you select the environment you would like to use. You can switch back and forth desktop environments to your hearts delight. As you can see, changing desktop environments in Linux Mint is quite easy. Setting Up An Internet Radio Setting up an internet radio is quite easy nowadays. From the Linux perspective, there are two obvious choices. Either go with Icecast or Shoutcast. I went with Icecast because it was the easy option. Shoutcast is probably more popular since it has a better directory listing if you want your internet radio advertised to potential listeners. But I’m not really interesting in listing my internet radio. I just want a proof of concept that it works. Installing Icecast on the Ubuntu server is quite easy as running “sudo apt-get install icecast2″ from the Terminal. You’ll be asked three different times to supply passwords for admin, relay and source accounts. Once you have Icecast server installed on the Ubuntu. It’s time to open up the port number from the firewall. The default port is 8000. You can change the port number later by editing the Icecast config file. It should be the /etc/icecast2/icecast.xml file. As far as the broadcast software, I’m using a simple software called Butt, which means “broadcast using this tool.” It’s a funny name if you ask me, but it’s very simple and it works flawlessly. It’s also free. There are other options, but I just want something simple, and Butt serves that purpose. Now, Butt is capable of capturing the sound input of your computer’s microphone and sending it to Icecast. As long as you can play it on your computer, you should be able to broadcast it on your internet radio. I’m sending out the output of my desktop speaker to an audio mixer, and then sending out the output of the mixer back to to the computer’s microphone line in. This gives me the ability to play anything on the computer and broadcast it. In addition, I can add a microphone to the audio mixer and have the ability to speak to an audience using any dynamic or condenser microphone that you may already have. That is pretty much the setup in a nutshell without going into the nitty gritty details. How to Start, Stop and Restart MySQL What do you do if your database server is down? Well, you can certainly reboot the server. That might solve the problem, but I rather restart the database first before doing something as drastic as rebooting a server. There are instances were rebooting doesn’t always solve the problem if there’s an issue with the database. Now, most open-source blogs and web applications today use MySQL as their database of choice. So, here are instructions on how to start, stop and restart MySQL on Ubuntu and Debian-based systems. Stop MySQL database $ sudo /etc/init.d/mysql stop Start MySQL database $ sudo /etc/init.d/mysql start Restart MySQL database $ sudo /etc/init.d/mysql restart Ubuntu Releases Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu is once again contemplating whether to go with interim releases or go with rolling releases. The company has entertained this idea at least once before ultimately settling with the old release schedule. Now, there are talks again of doing away the old schedule or going with a rolling release. Why can’t Ubuntu do both releases. Canonical should do LTS (Long Term Support) for companies and individuals who clearly have a need for long term support, while most individuals like myself would rather have a rolling release to keep with latest developments, as well as avoid big haul upgrades every six months. That would be the ideal situation. Resize Disk Images At Linode Virtual private servers or VPS such as Linode, where this site is hosted, allow users the ability to resize their disk images. Resizing allows you to allocate more storage to a disk image so you can store more files, or shrink a disk image so you have more storage for the other disk images in your account. Here’s a quick checklist on how to resize a disk image in Linode. 1. Log in to the Linode Manager. 2. Click the Linodes tab. A list of your virtual private servers appears. 3. Select a Linode. The Linode’s dashboard appears. 4. Click Shut down to turn your Linode off. 5. Select the disk image you want to resize. The Edit Disk Image webpage appears. 6. In the New Size field, enter a different size for the disk image in megabytes. 7. Click Save Changes. The Linode’s dashboard appears. 8. Click Boot to turn on the Linode. 9. You have successfully resized the disk image. How To Setup Client Bridge I have an old Linksys WRT54GL router flashed with an open-source firmware DD-WRT. One of the nice things you can do with DD-WRT is configure it as a client bridge. You can then use the client bridge to connect a computer with no wireless network interface to the network. This article was written to help me remember in the future how to setup a client bridge on a Linksys WRT54GL flashed with DD-WRT. The configuration details pertains more to me and may not necessarily work out for your setup. If you want a more complete instruction, check out the client bridge documentation available from DD-WRT’s website. 1. Reset the router. Login. Set username and password. 2. Go to Wireless > Wireless Security. Set security mode and key to match your AP. 3. Go to Wireless > Basic. Set wireless mode to Client Bridge. 4. The wireless mode and SSID should be the same as your AP. 5. Go to Setup > Basic setup and manually set IP address. 6. Set IP address to 10.10.10.12. Leave local DNS blank. Main router is 10.10.10.11. 7. Go to Security > Firewall and disable SPI firewall and only multicast checked. 8. Go to Setup > Advanced Routing. Change mode from gateway to router.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
User:Tarika-E- Naqshabandi Khairiya The admin of this account would like to introduce two Great Sufis who were born and brought up in this region.These two Great Sufi Saints left behind Sufi Literature that surpasses the standard of all existing body of Sufi Literature.Their stature goes above the level of great Persian Sufis like Rumi, Jami, Attar, Sanai, Hafiz,Shams E Tabriz,Ahmad Jam.They are Hazarat Shahsufi Gausul Azam Mawlana Abul Khair Naqshabandi (RH) and Kutubul Aqtab Hazarat Shahsufi Mawlana Mohammed Kamal Uddin Isa Ahmed Naqshabandi (RH).	WIKI
In the 1800s, the abolitionists of Illinois decided to get together and fight for slavery. This was a time period when slavery took over america, and it was also the century slavery was condemned, due to these hard working people.They never gave up even when angry mobs were fighting back. Illinois wasn’t a slave state, but it was a protesting state, and this was where most of the abolitionists worked.Abolitionists in Illinois decided to get together and fight to end slavery in the 1830s-1860s, Chicago Illinois. This made a huge turn on history since Blacks were no longer treated as property, which resulted in a huge victory for abolitionists of Illinois. One of the biggest conflicts in the world at the time, was slavery.The head abolitionist, Elijah P. Lovejoy, studied at Princeton Theological Seminary and became a presbyterian preacher. His editorials criticized slavery,which started to bring attention to the topic. Some people in Illinois didn’t care that much about slavery since it was a free state, but Elijah didn’t like slavery at all, and that’s why he protested and always criticized it. Slavery arose and it became a huge deal to many people, which also arose many more future abolitionists. Elijah Lovejoy and his fellow abolitionists started their protests. They used newspapers,speeches,mass meetings, and conventions. Lots of the underground railroad conductors helped Elijah and the rest of the abolitionists to condemn slavery. The movement also joined with the Liberty Party in the 1840s and ran candidates for office. The abolitionists used persuasive tactics, and writing to try and convince people of the evils of slavery.Then, their protesting societies grew. The abolitionist movement accomplished the biggest thing in all of history, and that thing is abolishing slavery. Even though the movement almost failed. When Elijah P. Lovejoy died, many people that agreed with slavery thought that the movement was over, but it wasn’t. Elijah’s brother, Owen Lovejoy, took control of the movement, and they continued to protest even when their best leader had perished from a mob attack.Owen Lovejoy also did very good things just like his brother. He assisted runaway slaves in escaping to freedom because he cared very much about ending slavery just like lovejoy. This shows how much determination this movement had, and how much they wanted to end slavery, and they eventually accomplished the biggest goal in history. The abolitionist movement was one of the most achieving movements and probably the most important movement because of the simple fact that it ended slavery. This accomplishment made people equal, therefore bringing people of all race and color together. Blacks were finally treated as a full person and they were no longer treated as property. History should remember this as the biggest achievement in america. This also still affects us because there is still slavery in some parts of the world today, but in america we have put an end to it. If it wasn’t for Elijah Lovejoy and his amazing abolitionists, i wouldn’t be typing this essay right now. It is all because of them.	FINEWEB-EDU
IBM 3590 The IBM 3590 is a series of tape drives and corresponding magnetic tape data storage media formats developed by IBM. The first drive, having the IBM product number 3590, was introduced in 1995 under the nickname Magstar. The 3590 series of tape drives and media are not compatible with the IBM 3592 line of drives that replaced it. They can store up to 60 GB of data (uncompressed). This family superseded the IBM 3480 Family of tape drives popular in 1980s and 1990s. Like the 3480 and 3592 formats, this tape format has half inch tape spooled onto 4-by-5-by-1 inch data cartridges containing a single reel. A takeup reel is embedded inside the tape drive. Because of their speed, reliability, durability and low media cost, the 3590 tape drives are still in high demand. A hallmark of the genre is interchangeability: Tapes recorded with one tape drive are generally readable on another drive, even if the tape drives were built by different manufacturers. Magstar tapes and drives exist in 128, 256 and 384-track versions. It is important to be aware that the tape is written at the drive's defined density and can only be read in a drive of the same model type or a higher version model. So a tape written in the H drive can only be read in an H drive. A tape written in an E drive can be read in an E drive and an H drive. A tape written in a B drive can be read in a B, E or H drive. Unlike DLT, LTO or 3592 drive variants, the 3590 drive is not capable of writing at a lower density than its native density. There is often confusion in naming of the media and drives, the drives usually being referred to as 3590B, 3590E and 3590H. There are two types of media, the standard length media often being referred to as 3590 or 3590B, and the extended length media often being referred to as 3590E. Both types of media can be written in all three drives, the 3590E in the Ultra variant of the 3590B drive. Drives * 3590 B Model (3590 B11/B1A), 128 tracks, up to 9 MB/s native data rate. Announced April 1995. * 3590 E Model (3590 E11/E1A), 256 tracks, up to 14 MB/s native data rate. Announced April 1999. * 3590 H Model (3590 H11/H1A), 384 tracks, up to 14 MB/s native data rate. Announced July 2002.	WIKI
Exclusive: EU to fine Altice for jumping gun on PT Portugal deal - source BRUSSELS (Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are set to hit French telecoms and cable group Altice ( ATCA.AS ) with a hefty fine for concluding its 2015 acquisition of PT Portugal without first waiting for official approval, a person familiar with the matter said on Wednesday. FILE PHOTO: Plastic pens with logos of Altice are pictured before a news conference in Paris, France March 20, 2018. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo The European Commission’s decision could come as early as next week, with the timing subject to change, the source said. The sanction by the EU competition enforcer is expected to send a warning to companies that fail to respect procedural rules, such as jumping the gun and taking control of their targets or giving incorrect data before gaining the regulatory go-ahead. Facebook was fined 110 million euros last year for giving misleading information during a vetting of its deal to acquire messaging service WhatsApp in 2014. The Commission, which accused Altice of the violation in May last year, can impose fines up to 10 percent of a company’s global turnover for breaching EU rules. The company posted 23.43 billion euros in revenues last year. Both the Commission and Altice, which is controlled by billionaire founder Patrick Drahi, declined to comment. France’ s competition regulator imposed an 80 million euro fine on Altice two years ago for engaging in plans to buy SFR and Virgin Mobile before getting the necessary clearance. The Commission last year also charged Merck ( MRCG.DE ) and Sigma-Aldrich, General Electric ( GE.N ), and Canon ( 7751.T ) with breaching EU procedural rules in their respective merger deals. Rulings are expected in the coming months. Reporting by Foo Yun Chee, additional reporting by Mathieu Rosemain in Paris; Editing by Robert-Jan Bartunek and Edmund Blair	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Talk:Art market What Counts Sections I added a citation needed for the "What Counts" section of this article. I think this topic - at its current length and depth- doesn't warrant its own section. Information could be added elsewhere in the article without loss of clarity. K.MtLandis (talk) 19:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)	WIKI
Mo' Roots (Maceo Parker album) Mo'Roots is an album by the American saxophonist Maceo Parker, released in 1991. It peaked at No. 4 on Billboard's Traditional Jazz Albums chart. Production Mo' Roots was produced by Stephan Meyner and Parker. Fred Wesley and Pee Wee Ellis played on the album. "Sister Sadie" is a cover of the Horace Silver song. Critical reception The Chicago Tribune determined that "there's enough variety to keep things interesting, but enough clarity of musical direction to make it all hang together and, more important, make Parker feel at home with the material." The Washington Post wrote: "From Dixieland to hard bop to R&B, from Lionel Hampton to Ray Charles to Marvin Gaye to Otis Redding to Maceo himself, it's all here, underscored by an unfussy and decidedly funky rhythm section and enlivened by a now legendary horn triumvirate." Personnel * Maceo Parker - alto saxophone * Bill Stewart - drums * Rodney Jones - guitar * Larry Goldings - Hammond organ * Pee Wee Ellis - tenor saxophone * Fred Wesley - trombone * Jimmy Madison - drums on "Fa Fa Fa (The Sad Song)" * Kym Mazelle, Maceo Parker - vocals on "Fa Fa Fa (The Sad Song" * Steve Williamson - alto saxophone on "Jack's Back" * Technical * Achim Kröpsch - cover photography	WIKI
Talk:Maria the Virgin Witch Anime starting Maria the Virgin Witch now has an anime producing starts 11 January 2015. The anime is currently expanding with an English dub producing simultaneously. If you feel the article has something to improve, Please give advice where necessary. Thanks!!! --Hongqilim (talk) 08:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)	WIKI
Murray Bourchier (diplomat) Murray Goulburn Madden Bourchier (28 March 19253 July 1981) was an Australian public servant and diplomat. Life and career Bourchier joined the Commonwealth Public Service in 1951 as a cadet in the Department of External Affairs. In August 1971 Bourchier's appointment as Australian Ambassador to the Republic of Korea was announced. He took up his appointment as head of mission in November 1971. From 1977 to 1980 Bourchier was Australian Ambassador to the Soviet Union. Relationships between the two countries were tense during the period. In 1979 Bourchier was medically evacuated from Moscow to London where he was diagnosed with a cerebral tumour. He stepped down from his post in August 1980. In June 1981, Bouchier was appointed an Officer in the general division of the Order of Australia in recognition of his services as a diplomatic representative. Bourchier died at home in Deakin, Canberra, on Friday 3 July 1981.	WIKI
Why can’t I lose weight despite eating little? Why can’t I lose weight despite eating little? Many people ask themselves this question: why can’t I lose weight despite eating little? In this article we will see one of the main causes that lead you to gain weight even if you moderate at the table and the possible solutions. WHY I CAN’T LOSE WEIGHT WHEN EATING LITTLE: 1) Because you are not eating a little (not really): many people tend to underestimate how much they eat, even without realizing it. In particular, there are reasons why this happens. – you eat a lot of industrial foods: the calories on the food labels can be wrong up to 20% of what is described and very often the portions suggested on the packages are much less than what we consume. The ideal would therefore be to focus on simple foods, such as vegetables, fruit, fish or unprepared meat, tubers and whole grains. – you often eat out: when you eat out, even twice a week, eat in the canteen or order ready-made foods, you have no idea how they are prepared. In many cases, fats that we do not imagine are added to keep them palatable: for example, foods can be fried in a lot of oil, extra oil or other types of condiments can be added to vegetables and cold pasta. Searching the internet for the calories of complex recipes that are also eaten by friends or relatives, such as parmigiana or tiramisu, makes no sense. Often the calories are double what we imagine. – we use the calorie counter apps badly or we don’t know how to dose portions: there is a big difference between a level spoonful of oil and a full spoon, a difference of about 30 or 40 calories. If we use parmesan and breadcrumbs in many preparations that seem healthy to us, such as vegetable balls or gratin dishes, these two items affect the calorie count of the meal. If we use apps to count calories, but we put complex recipes and not single foods, those calories can be overestimated by up to 30%: in particular, there is a difference according to the cuts of meat, there is a difference in the pasta. stuffed, in desserts such as homemade ice cream or cakes. Calories can vary by as much as 200 per serving! – because we eat without realizing it: many people are convinced that they eat little, but they constantly nibble between meals, for example they put a piece of cheese in their mouth, they eat the topping of cakes or pieces of cake to avoid eating the whole cake, they nibble little things like a potato chip or half a cookie (or cookie crumbs) thinking this doesn’t affect the calorie count. A big mistake, alas. – because calories are NOT everything: calories are a great tool for keeping weight under control, but, partly because of the enormous limitations of calorie calculation, partly because people do not pay attention to the quality of food, it is a lot It is also important to pay attention to how many sugars, fats and proteins we consume. You May Also Like More From Author + There are no comments Add yours	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Graham Clarke (musician) Graham Peter Clarke (born July 11, 1970) is an American musician, songwriter, arranger, and entertainer. Active since 1995 and performing in the New York metropolitan area, Clarke has played well over 5,000 musical performances on the east coast for children and adults. His style has been described as funny and "off-center". He self-publishes his music. 1970 to 1988: early years Graham Clarke was born in Holy Name Medical Center in Teaneck, New Jersey on July 11, 1970. Clarke's parents, Lorain Maria Clarke (née Meola), a homemaker, and Thomas Michael "Moose" Clarke, a stockbroker were married in 1960 and had three children before Graham: Thomas in 1961, Dennis in 1962, and Martin in 1965. He spent the first seven years of his life in a split-level home in Dumont, New Jersey. He was frequently in the room when his older brother Tommy would have guitar lessons with musician Bob Berger. Bob noted one time when a screaming Graham had scarlet fever "That boy's screaming on key! That's a C note." Such exposure to music had an obvious influence on him and there is an oft-told family story that claims the first song Graham ever learned to sing was "Me and Julio Down by the Schoolyard," a popular song Tommy was learning on the guitar at the time. At the age of seven, his family moved one town over to Oradell, where he attended St. Joseph Grammar School, and later Bergen Catholic High School. Neither school had a music program so Graham taught himself how to play the guitar using his brother's old fake books. 1989 to 1996: Burgeoning musician Attending Boston College in the fall of 1988, Clarke accepted an invitation into the school's undergraduate Honors Program. In addition to performing at bars, clubs and street performances at subway stations, he acted at the Robsham Theater and wrote sketch comedy for the campus coffeehouse. He also traveled with conductor Alexander Peloquin and the Boston College Chorale, singing as a bass, baritone, and tenor. In 1991 Graham met his future wife, Peggy Clarke (née Amlung), who was a graduate student in the BC theology department. After graduation in 1992, Clarke moved to New Rochelle in the affluent Westchester suburbs of New York City. In September he took a job working as an English teacher at Evander Childs High School in the Bronx. In 1994, he left teaching and entered the philosophy PhD program at Fordham University. In an effort to help his sister-in-law, Janine, in 1995 Clarke began caring part-time for Janine's son, Blake. Noticing how much Blake enjoyed it when he brought over his guitar, Janine, herself a teacher, suggested that he go to the local nursery schools daycare centers to see if they needed a music specialist. She gave him some Raffi cassettes and other children's music she used in the classroom. By the end of 1996, Clarke was making weekly visits to over 20 schools and daycare centers and parties throughout Westchester and Rockland Counties. From 1999 onward, he worked as a children's party entertainment in Westchester. Graham & Delores In 1996 Clarke approached John Reynolds to help him make his first album, Graham & Delores. Recorded at Arrigoni Center, a former Episcopal church, at Iona College on a TASCAM 4-track portastudio (borrowed from noted Thomas Merton scholar Kathleen Deignan), the album featured only Clarke and his guitar with no over-dubbing. It was released in 1997 selling out the original run of over 1000 units strictly at his local shows by 1998. Graham & Cinnamon Branching out in 1999, Clarke followed up with a second album Graham & Cinnamon which featured a much more studio produced sound. Again, he went to John Reynolds for production assistance. Reynolds brought him to the (now defunct) Nu Bleu Recording Studio in Garfield, NJ run by Andy Halasz. The instrumentation expanded well beyond Clarke and his guitar. Reynolds contributed invaluably to this album by providing arrangements and playing every instrument on the album besides Graham's guitar. Songs like "If I Live to Be 100" and "Grandma Can You Jump?" benefitted greatly from Reynolds instrumentation (including playing the drums, which Reynods had never played before) and the recording experience he brought with him from The Goatmen and Every Damn Day. Clarke started to receive airplay on local radio stations, premiering on WPLJ's "Scott and Todd: The Big Show". American Blue Released in June 2001, American Blue again saw Clarke moving further out of his one-man-one-guitar recordings. This time he brought on his brother Tommy Clarke to help produce. They recorded over a weekend at the studio of Jazz-o-lution bassist's Marshall Topo, with whom he had worked for Carla Henderson's "Your Tiny" videos) in Port Chester, NY. The album's crown jewel, "Fancy Pants", is a paean to one of Clarke's musical heroes, David Bowie. But many of Clarke's songs are clearly the product by his local work with groups of children in the Lower Hudson Valley region of New York and Clarke has said at his live shows that "Jack, Jack, Jackson and Jason" are four actual boys from one of his music classes. Always assuming intelligence on the part of the child, Clarke arranged a version of the Christmas carol 'We Three Kings" incorporated elements from Mozart's Requiem Mass, especially the vocal portion of "Lacrimosa dies illa". American Blue also featured Clarke's first a cappella recording, a reworking of the Georgia Sea Island folksong "Old Lady Come from Brewster" using only his voice for the "instruments". The album's "Sword and Shield" is noted on the back cover as "for Peg", apparently a dedication to his wife. Acoustic New York After the September 11 attacks in 2001, Clarke made an album devoted entirely to New York. Recorded at Tommy's home in Cambridge, Acoustic New York was released on the one-year anniversary of the 9-11 attacks. FiVE In 2004, Clarke released FiVE. Television and video It was during the production of American Blue that Clarke started to branch into children's video. He made the "Quills Up!" video for the American Association of Poison Control Centers with producer Jonathan Katz and provided music for the "Your Tiny" series of videos produced by Carla Henderson for Child Smart. Clarke also looked into landing his own children's television show. After being approached by a television network executive mother and an inspiring meeting with Sesame Street's Gordon, Clarke began work on a TV pilot with actor-writer Brian Reid . But the experience was cut short by sour experiences with personalities in the television industry and by the economic aftermath following the September 11 attacks. Clarke has been a frequent guest on News 12 and other local TV stations. He often appears during special holiday segments, often appearing and singing with children. Charity work Clarke has done benefits for many charities including the 2004 tsunami victims and Widows of 9-11. He enjoyed a 15-month-long weekly performance at Blythedale Children's Hospital. Clarke also donates performances annually to The Red Cross, Kids in Crisis, multiple Junior Leagues, as well as many local charities, schools, and libraries. Guitars Clarke plays Ovation guitars almost exclusively. He owns four: "Delores", "Cinnamon", "Bluebell", and "Blondie". He was given a 1986 Collector's Edition by his brother Tommy. Although he records with it (reportedly Hogging the Covers was performed entirely with it), Graham rarely plays it in public. Personal life Graham has been married to his wife Peggy since May 28, 1994. Peggy is currently senior minister at Community Church of New York. They live in Somers, New York. They have a child, Zachary. Clarke was raised Roman Catholic, but left the faith by his time at Boston College. Though technically not a member, he does frequently attend services and perform at the Unitarian Universalists. He also sees his family frequently and all four brothers make an annual trip to a different city to watch a live professional hockey game. He is a dog lover and has owned dogs his entire adult life, often including them in his songs ("Come on Up, Athena", "Man in the Moon"). He is a resident of Somers, New York. Relatives Clarke is first cousin to film score composer Alan Silvestri. Discography * Graham & Delores (1997) * Graham & Cinnamon (1999) * American Blue (2001) * Acoustic New York (2003) * Five (2005) * Hoggin' the Covers (2012)	WIKI
Property Lists The property list of a symbol is an association list that is attached to that symbol. The association list maps properties, which are themselves symbols, to arbitrary values. Procedure putprop (putprop symbol property obj) => unspecified If an association exists for property on the property list of symbol, then its value is replaced by the new value obj. Otherwise, a new association is added to the property list of symbol that associates property with obj. Procedure getprop (getprop symbol property) => obj If an association exists for property on the property list of symbol, then its value is returned. Otherwise, #f is returned. Procedure remprop (remprop symbol property) => unspecified If an association exists for property on the property list of symbol, then that association is removed. Otherwise, this is a no-op. $Id: proplist.html,v 1.3 2000/09/12 02:46:46 lth Exp $ larceny@ccs.neu.edu	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Last answered: 18 Dec 2022 Posted on: 12 Jul 2021 1 14. SQL JOINs - Error Code: 1055 (only_full_group_by) Hi, Please can you advise how to resolve this issue? After using the following code I receive an error message relating to the 'only_full_group_by' mode set in MySQL - after searching on stackoverflow and the official docs (https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/group-by-handling.html) - the workaround is to disable the mode but this was not mentioned on the course? Code: SELECT m.dept_no, m.emp_no, d.dept_name FROM dept_manager_dupe m JOIN departments_dupe d ON m.dept_no = d.dept_no GROUP BY m.emp_no ORDER BY m.dept_no; Output: Error Code: 1055. Expression #1 of SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column 'employees.m.dept_no' which is not functionally dependent on columns in GROUP BY clause; this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by 8 answers ( 0 marked as helpful) Instructor Posted on: 15 Jul 2021 4 Hi Thomas! Thanks for reaching out. Depending on your operating system and version of MySQL, you will be working with different SQL settings. To make sure you can take some of the remaining lectures of the course without unnecessary interruption, we strongly advise you to execute the following query now. set @@global.sql_mode := replace(@@global.sql_mode, 'ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY', ''); If you’re interested in the reason we are asking you to do this, you can read the technical description below. Please be aware that it may sound a bit too abstract at this stage. However, you can always refer back to it once you have completed the lectures about the different types of SQL variables found in the Advanced SQL Tools section of the course. Technical description: The GROUP BY clause will be used in several queries by the end of the course. Different versions of the SQL language and MySQL, in particular, can set different limits on how the GROUP BY clause can be applied. In some of the lectures in the JOINs section, we have opted for queries where multiple table columns that are not included in the GROUP BY clause will be listed in the SELECT statement. We have decided this is the correct approach to teaching the use of the GROUP BY clause at this stage. At the same time, we are aware some versions of MySQL may not allow such queries, or at least not by default. To adjust the relevant default settings, there is a system variable, called ‘sql_mode’, which needs to be reconfigured. In order to view the current value of this variable in your case, you have to execute the following command. select @@global.sql_mode; An expression containing a few values, separated by commas, will appear in the result grid. They correspond to various MySQL settings that influence the way in which MySQL will behave in different situations. One of these values, ‘only_full_group_by’, blocks certain type of group statements and that can potentially lead to Error Code 1055. The latter signifies the problem of listing fields in the SELECT statement that are not included in the GROUP BY clause. Naturally, we want to avoid that. Hence, to prevent it from happening, we must execute the following statement. set @@global.sql_mode := replace(@@global.sql_mode, 'ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY', ''); REPLACE() is the function that will remove the “only_full_group_by” value from the expression here. Thus, error 1055 will not show up in the future. Finally, if for some reason you’d like to disallow this behavior you can always execute the following command which will do exactly the opposite: it will add the “only_full_group_by” value to the expression. set @@global.sql_mode := concat('ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY,', @@global.sql_mode); That said, we must also add that there is a reason behind this functionality. If you think about it, it is not logical to allow a column value to be listed in the output alongside a value that has been included in the GROUP BY clause of the query. We just cannot be sure that the not-grouped value that has been retrieved is going to be correct. But for the sake of our exercises, and for the purpose of making them clearer, we have allowed such syntax. Hope this helps. Best, Martin Posted on: 22 Sept 2021 0 Martin, I got the same error message as Thomas. I executed the query set @@global.sql_mode := replace(@@global.sql_mode, 'ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY', ''); and I still receive Error 1055. Is there another method? Instructor Posted on: 07 Oct 2021 0 Hi Emma! Thanks for reaching out. In that case, since you may have been using a different setting, did you try the opposite command - set @@global.sql_mode := concat('ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY,', @@global.sql_mode); Please retry with this command and let us know if you need further assistance. Thank Hope this helps. Best, Martin Posted on: 31 Oct 2021 1 Hi Martin, I had also experienced the same error and tried the solution as you sugested. But it didn't work out and error 1055 is still there. But when I put distinct function, I got the same result as you (20 records). I am not sure whether it is the correct way to do it or not. Here is my query: SELECT DISTINCT m.dept_no, m.emp_no, d.dept_name FROM dept_manager_dup m JOIN departments_dup d ON m.dept_no = d.dept_no ORDER BY dept_no; Thanks. Posted on: 10 Nov 2021 10 I'm getting error 1055 as well trying out the solution, the reverse, then the solution again. I'm using Ubuntu 20.04. However, I found a solution just after one search: From: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36207042/error-code-1055-incompatible-with-sql-mode-only-full-group-by execute this query: SET sql_mode=(SELECT REPLACE(@@sql_mode,'ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY','')); Hope it helps. Instructor Posted on: 19 Nov 2021 1 Hi Zayar and Duncan! Thanks for reaching out! Thank you bot for sharing solutions with the Community! @Zayar: Yes, in this case, the solution is correct, taking into account that you are working with the same settings (only full group by switched on). Therefore, @Duncan: Thank you for providing an alternative solution! Hopefully, it will work for others, too! Kind regards, Martin Posted on: 10 Dec 2022 0 Hi, i noticed the query was referring to employees.m.dept_no which is not required in this example, but i guess it was stored in memory from the previous exercise (172,173). So i decided to restart MySQL server and that worked for me. Instructor Posted on: 18 Dec 2022 0 Hi Lazar! Thanks for reaching out and sharing your solution with the Community! Restarting the server may have set the correct settings into place as well. Alternatively, some manipulations you have made throughout the session to a table whose alias you have designed to be m, should not have been applied after the restart. Hope this clarifies the situation one step further. Kind regards, Martin Submit an answer	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Lincoln Center Season Includes Gianandrea Noseda and Christian Gerhaher Gianandrea Noseda leading the London Symphony Orchestra in the Verdi Requiem, the baritone Christian Gerhaher singing a program of Mahler lieder, and the pianist Jeremy Denk playing a recital of music from medieval to modern times will be among the highlights of next season’s Great Performers series at Lincoln Center, whose lineup was announced on Tuesday. The series will run on and off from Oct. 28 through May 21, 2017 and will feature several prominent symphony orchestras, chamber ensembles, recitals and chamber music concerts, among other offerings. In addition to two London Symphony concerts with Mr. Noseda, who was just named the next music director of the National Symphony Orchestra in Washington, it will feature appearances by Ivan Fischer conducting the Budapest Festival Orchestra in two Beethoven programs and Vladimir Jurowski leading the London Philharmonic Orchestra. Smaller ensembles, including Gabrieli; the Salzburg Mozarteum Orchestra; the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment; and Les Arts Florissants, led by William Christie, will all perform. Recitals will include one by the soprano Diana Damrau, accompanied by Xavier de Maistre on the harp, in works by Debussy, Strauss, Hahn and Chausson; and the New York recital debut of the soprano Anne Schwanewilms, accompanied by Malcolm Martineau on the piano.	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Feet To Meters 8770 ft to m 8770 Foot to Meters 8770 Foot to Meter converter ft = m How to convert 8770 foot to meters? 8770 ft 0.3048 m= 2673.096 m 1 ft A common question is How many foot in 8770 meter? And the answer is 28772.9658792 ft in 8770 m. Likewise the question how many meter in 8770 foot has the answer of 2673.096 m in 8770 ft. How much are 8770 feet in meters? 8770 feet equal 2673.096 meters (8770ft = 2673.096m). Converting 8770 ft to m is easy. Simply use our calculator above, or apply the formula to change the length 8770 ft to m. Convert 8770 ft to common lengths UnitLength Nanometer2.673096e+12 nm Micrometer2673096000.0 µm Millimeter2673096.0 mm Centimeter267309.6 cm Inch105240.0 in Foot8770.0 ft Yard2923.33333333 yd Meter2673.096 m Kilometer2.673096 km Mile1.6609848485 mi Nautical mile1.4433563715 nmi What is 8770 feet in m? To convert 8770 ft to m multiply the length in feet by 0.3048. The 8770 ft in m formula is [m] = 8770 0.3048. Thus, for 8770 feet in meter we get 2673.096 m. 8770 Foot Conversion Table 8770 Foot Table Further feet to meters calculations Alternative spelling 8770 ft to Meter, 8770 Foot to m, 8770 ft to m, 8770 Feet in m, 8770 Foot to Meters, 8770 Foot in Meters, 8770 Foot to Meter, 8770 Feet to Meters, 8770 Feet in Meters, Further Languages	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
An African american that made an invention and a impact on the world was George Washington Carter he developed techniques to improve soils for crops which he did by repeatedly planting cotton. He wanted poor farmers to grow alternative crops (peanuts and sweet potatoes) to improve the quality of their life. He made 105 recipes using peanuts even though none of them became commercially successful. This person is inspirational he tried new things to help better other people and make the quality of other people lives better. I believe that that’s a great impact that he had by repeatedly planting cotton and trying to come up with new recipes. In spite of his work he helped out many farmers he was also a leader in promoting environmentalism and received numerous honors from his work. George Washington Carter was as well a scientist and a chemist and born into slavery in 1864 in Diamond Grove Missouri. George Washington Carter was also was a champion of crop rotation and agricultural education. Carter died January 5 1943.	FINEWEB-EDU
-- New Zealand's Dairy Farms May Face a Second Year of Drought, Minister Says New Zealand’s largest dairy-farming region may face a summer drought for a second year, slowing the nation’s economic recovery and pushing up global milk prices . The risk of a significant drought in Waikato, the largest milk-producing province, and Northland is “very high,” with little rain forecast for the next month, Agriculture Minister David Carter said today in an interview from Christchurch. “We are heading for extremely dry conditions, probably drought,” Carter said. “It’s not hard to get a significant drought in New Zealand making a difference to GDP.” Lower farm production could curb New Zealand’s exports, which make up about 30 percent of the $125 billion economy, and may push up global milk prices. Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd., the largest dairy exporter, collected 4.3 percent less milk in the season ended May 31 than a year earlier because farmers halted milking early amid extremely dry conditions in Waikato. “We’re monitoring the weather conditions closely,” a Fonterra spokesman said in an e-mailed response to questions from Bloomberg. “While much of the country has had less rain than usual over the last six weeks, it’s too early to know what impact this will have on total milk production for the season.” Whole-milk powder prices climbed to a two-month high at Fonterra’s latest GlobalDairyTrade auction. Spot contract prices rose 1.3 percent, while prices for the period from March to May surged 4.1 percent. Farm Profits “We wonder if the weather risk is starting to be priced into the auction prices,” said Doug Steel , markets economist at Bank of New Zealand Ltd. in Wellington. “The longer-term contracts well into next year are where the price rises occurred. I would suspect a little of that risk premium going into those longer-dated contracts now.” New Zealand’s economy expanded 0.2 percent in the second quarter, as the nation makes a sluggish recovery from the worst recession in three decades, which ended in the first quarter of 2009. Growth is forecast to be 2.5 percent this year and 2.6 percent in 2011, the central bank said in September. Steel declined to speculate on how much a drought might slow economic growth next year. As well as milk production, drought can disrupt livestock slaughter as farmers reduce stock levels earlier than normal, he said. “If it doesn’t dent production itself it will put upward pressure on feed costs and profitability on farms is certainly going to decrease,” he said. Soil Moisture Soil moisture conditions in the Waikato province are at levels normally expected in January and temperatures were the highest in 100 years, Stewart Wadey, provincial president for Federated Farmers Inc. said in an e-mailed statement yesterday. “I was in the Waikato yesterday and just flying in and out you can see how dry the conditions are there,” Carter said. The government will be monitoring reports to assess whether to declare a medium-scale drought event that will trigger support measures for affected farmers, he said. “The effect of a single drought is insidiously long on any farming family,” he said. “I’ve farmed through droughts in Canterbury. They affect you for a long time. To have two in a row is devastating.” New Zealand is experiencing a La Nina weather pattern, which is characterized by high early season temperatures, according to the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research . Its forecasts to January suggest below-average rainfall and soil moisture levels are likely on the nation’s South Island and average rainfall in the north. “It’s certainly a lot drier than normal north of Taupo,” said Steel, referring to a central North Island lake. The risk of a drought “is starting to turn a little bit into reality and as for January, February it remains an unknown but the signs aren’t looking that good,” he said. To contact the reporter on this story: Tracy Withers in Wellington at twithers@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Iain Wilson iwilson2@bloomberg.net	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
SPX Capital SPX Capital (SPX) is a Brazilian multi-strategy hedge fund management firm headquartered in Rio de Janeiro. It has a focus on global macro although it also has strategies in both traditional and alternative investment asset classes. It is one of the biggest independent fund managers in Brazil. SPX has additional offices in São Paulo, New York, London, Cascais and Singapore. Background SPX was co-founded in 2010 by former Banco BBM employees Rogério Xavier, Bruno Pandolfi and Daniel Schneider. The firm's name is an acronym formed from Schneider, Pandolfi and Xavier. SPX initially focused on global macro strategies based on fundamental analysis which the three co-founders built during their time at Banco BBM. In 2012, another Banco BBM employee, Leonardo Linhares joined SPX to lead its equity strategies. In February 2019, two senior portfolio managers left SPX. Sources speculated the moves was caused by the firm's culture which had little corporate fluidity among partners and was borderline bullying when it came to demanding results. SPX's four founding partners had 72.8% ownership of the firm and because the firm had become so large, it became very expensive for other partners to buy into it. In addition employees were abused by their bosses if they were losing money. Xavier has stated SPX needed to preserve equity for its further expansion plans. He also stated while there was a harsh environment there was no routine for people to curse each other every day. It was not to humiliate but to make one do better. In May 2021, The Carlyle Group entered a partnership agreement with SPX to enter the Brazilian market. Members of Carlyle's team would join SPX to establish its private equity strategy. SPX would become a subadvisor to Carlyle's $776 million buyout fund focused on South America. At the same time, SPX also entered a partnership agreement with Cyrela Commercial Properties to create a joint venture that would invest in real assets. In November 2022, the SPX Raptor fund - a more aggressive version of the firm's flagship global macro fund, Nimitz reported a 11% loss. It had been the firm's best performing fund for the past two years and this was its first double-digit monthly loss since its inception in December 2010. Main contributors were rates and foreign currency bets. In July 2023, SPX apologized to its Raptor funholders as its perform for the first half of the year was 9.7% which was lower than all of its peers. Xavier stated it was caused by bullish bets on Brazil with Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva being elected. However the leader's rherotic led to a sharp selloff in Brazil securities. However other SPX funds such as its equities strategy had a return of 12.8% in the same timeframe which was the best performance among its peers. Overall SPX had a return of 4.9% for the first half of 2023. In February 2023, SPX, XP Inc. and several other asset management firms were appointed as committee members to represent Lojas Americanas bondholders after the company filed for bankruptcy, days after 20 billion reais ($3.9 billion) of "accounting inconsistencies" were discovered. SPX has expanded outside Brazil by setting up additional offices in other countries and has also diversified its investment strategies further. Xavier who is based in London has stated the Brazilian market is too small and SPX has the potential to become the largest asset manager in the world.	WIKI
Talk:Champon Definition This definition is from our about page, but it is a general definition. Not sure how to do the notation on this... also don't know if this is a valid article... Joi 08:43, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC) Is the disambugation for "Mongrel" really appropriate in this page? I've taken it off, but if someone else believes that it should be there, please feel free to put it back. Equivalent Dish section The Korean people I know consider their Jjamppong to be of Chinese origin. It's usually served in Korean-style-Chinese restaurants, alongside Jajangmyeon (which is derived from the Chinese dish Zhàjiàng miàn). There's no source given for the last paragraph, just a link to Talk:Korean cuisine which only confuses things further. Chinese think it's Korean, Koreans think it's Chinese, the Korean name is derived from Japanese, the Japanese name is derived from Malay, the Japanese say they invented it, the Okinawans have a different dish (in the same spirit) with the same name. Can anyone keep this straight? — AKADriver ☎ 18:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC) The time of Chinese immigration to Japan and Korea at late 19C is key to understand the origin of this dish. So we all understand this dish came from China. Chinese at Nagasaki created Japanese version of Champon noodle which is more like a ramen. and Chinse at Korea (especially Inchon) created Korean version as well but they made it hot with red pepper, red pepper oil and Duban source. And for next, Japanese invaded Korea at early 20C. At that time, Japanese culture and language impact on Korea a lot. So Japanse and Korean share same word for that noodle. Actually taste of Korean Chinese Champon is quite different from Nagasaki Champon. --Alf 12:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC) Confused origins The first sentences say it derives from China, and then that it has a partially Chinese origin, having been invented in Nagasaki by a Chinese restaurant owner. The second section seems to indicate that Nagasaki-style champon is a different food, with strong Korean influences. So, which is it? Is it a Chinese dish, a Chinese-influenced dish from Nagasaki, a Korean-influenced dish from Nagasaki, or a Korean dish? LordAmeth 14:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Etymology Is this word related to Chanpurū? Badagnani 02:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC) * No. -- KawaiiCafé ◯ ⁀ ‿‿ ⁀ ◯ (☏) 06:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * u sure about that? * while no one associates the dishes together in the here and now, i do believe that the terms are linked way back...similar to "sherbet" and "sorbet" in english, say. "cha" and "chan" appear in both langs in various terms for mixture or chaos (japanese "gocha-gocha", for starters). * i'm more confused by the mention of okinawa "rice champon" to begin with -- i have never seen this. are we sure the pic there is not, in fact, for champloo over rice?<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC) * The Japanese term chanpon appears to derive from Chinese, and is not related to the Okinawan-sourced Japanese term chanpurū, which in turn is from Indonesian / Malaysian campur. See also the respective Wiktionary entries: wikt:ちゃんぽん, wikt:チャンプルー. * It might be that the term campur in turn derives from the same Chinese roots as champon, but I have not yet seen any source that makes this connection. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 20:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC) I think adding the alcoholic drink reference is puerile (perhaps a younger contributor new to the concept of mixed alcoholic drinks) and not relevant; if others agree please strike that part Dudshan (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC) Merge discussion Chanpon seems to be a pared-down version of the article, focusing on the colloquial use not related to food (which is covered some in this article). I think having both will likely be too confusing, and think they'd be better combined into one article. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Please indicate your Merge or Don't Merge opinion below, and include your reasoning as well. Remember, this is a discussion, not a vote. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Discussion * Merge per my reasoning above. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC) * Merge or Redirect Chanpon to Champon. The former concentrates on a neologism; the latter has a fuller discussion of the Japanese dish. Fg2 (talk) 05:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC) * Merge, but isn't chanpon the correct romanization according to MOS:JP? I don't think champon qualifies for the "official spelling" exception. Google results are inconclusive (55k vs 86k), but champon is also a common French name and only 5 out of the first 20 hits seem to talk about the dish. Jpatokal (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC) * I agree about the spelling. Maybe it's better to delete Chanpon and rename Champon using that spelling? Fg2 (talk) 06:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC) * Let's deal with merging first, then the title once that's done. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC) * Redirect or Merge "Chanpon" into "Champon", since the bulk of the current "Chanpon" article can be abbreviated or omitted. I won't specify whether to use "Champon" or "Chanpon" as the article title, since either would be fine. The article should, however, note that the Yahoo Japan/Daijisen dictionary entry for ちゃんぽん suggests a Chinese etymology of . (The dictionary fails to indicate which Chinese dialect is relevant, but I'm guessing it's NOT Mandarin).--Endroit (talk) 17:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Jjamppong Nagasaki style Champon is similar to a Korean dish called Champong or Jjamppong (짬뽕) and a Shandong, China dish called chao ma mian (山東炒碼麵). The Shandong version tends to be the most spicy. Due to the proximity of these locations, the three dishes most likely share the same origin. This sentence has several problematic issues, so I delete the mention about shandong, China. First of all, Korean "jjamppong" is very different from nagasaki style champon. The ingredient for broth is made with seafood and chicken bone unlike pork soup used in Japanese champon. A raw egg is not topped on the noodle soup but chili pepper is included in jjamppong. I don't know Shandong really has chao ma mian, but according to Korean wikipedia, the name is a neologism made with hanja because the creators were Chinese. I think Shandong may have a similar dish but I doubt the name is chao ma mia.--Appletrees (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Well, they are basically variations of the same food developed by overseas Chinese communities in Nagasaki and Inchon, presumably from the same basic ideas--noodles in seafood broth, developed around the same time and probably drawing inspirations from each other (thus the same name, except for different romanizations), catering to different tastes of Japanese and Koreans. To keep them completely separate seems silly to me. It'd seem much more natural if the entries are merged. 2605:E000:1521:C21A:F946:E707:986B:34EA (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC) What's jjambbong? I'm perplexed by the description which give information of jjambbong as if it were a kind of Champon. I, and perhaps almost all of Japanese, think that jjambbong is not Champon. It should be explained on the other article.--Kiku b (talk) 03:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC) * Jjambbong is said to be almost an identical dish with Champon by making almost identical ingredients except the fact that it contains spicy chili pepper or others (don't know) according to Korean Wikipedia. Jjambbong and Chmapon have the same pronunciation with each other but due to the different Romanization methods applied by the two countries, it is spelled as such. The etymology is also speculated to be originated in Japan by Chinese immigrants and then some of them moved to Korea. So the root is said to be same. You're welcome to create the derivative article, but I don't think the info about the variant should be taken out just because you are not well aware of it. See Zha jiang mian and Jajangmyeon. --Caspian blue 03:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC) * Is there the source except Wikipedia?--Kiku b (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC) * Here is an English source.--Caspian blue 17:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC) * Thank you so much. I'm going to move the description of Korean dish to jjambbong page. Explanation of similarities between Champon and jjambbong will be also included.--Kiku b (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC) External links modified Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Champon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501145114/http://www.shikairou.com/2.htm to http://www.shikairou.com/2.htm Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC) TOC misalignment Due to pictures being added into the initial description the TOC shows up centered for me and the sections is overall messy. I don't think the pictures belong into the description? Wouldn't it be better to have a gallery for them? Nakonana (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)	WIKI
Nuclear regulatory approval drives NuScale customer interest, but no deals yet This story was originally published on Utility Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Utility Dive newsletter. Small modular reactor company NuScale Power aims to have “hard contracts” with “two or three major customers” by the end of 2025, CEO John Hopkins told investors and analysts on Thursday. Hopkins’ comments came as the company reported a significant jump in expenses in its Q2 2025 earnings update. It attributed the change to “higher business development costs associated with NuScale’s transition from a research and development-based company to a commercial company.” Though NuScale and its developer partner Entra1 have yet to finalize a deal, “we’re getting inundated now” with prospective customers following the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s May 29 approval of NuScale’s 77-MW power module, Hopkins said. NuScale’s 77-MW module supplanted an earlier 50-MW design the NRC approved in 2023. Some prospective customers had been in a holding pattern as the commission considered NuScale’s application for the uprated module, Hopkins said, adding, “It was accomplished. We’re there.” NuScale Chief Financial Officer Ramsey Hamady said the May approval puts NuScale in a class by itself among advanced nuclear technology companies.“We’re the only company with two NRC approvals for small modular reactors. There’s no other company with even one … and there [were] a lot of people out there doubting [us], saying, ‘Hey, you’re not gonna get through.’” For NuScale, the NRC decision amplified regulatory tailwinds supporting the wider nuclear industry, Hamady said. In an investor presentation Thursday, NuScale executives said four executive orders President Donald Trump signed in May would shorten regulatory timelines for new reactor deployments, bolster domestic nuclear supply chains and enable reactor development on military and other government-owned lands. The Trump administration “is pressed to get success stories quickly” on new nuclear deployments, Hopkins said, and it has “a limited period of time to make that happen.” That bodes well for NuScale and other advanced nuclear companies, he said. Hopkins’ comments about notching one or more customer deals by the end of the year echo recent company guidance and his comments on NuScale’s two previous quarterly earnings calls. In March, NuScale said it was in “advanced commercial dialogue with major technology and industrial companies, utilities, and national and local governments.” In May, Hopkins said the company was “in the process of submitting and negotiating term sheets” with potential customers. Hopkins and Hamady said Thursday that customer interest has increased since May, led by large technology companies, utilities and the U.S. military. NuScale also continues early work as a subcontractor on Fluor Corp.’s proposed 462-MW power plant in Romania, though the timeline for that project has slipped; NuScale now expects a final investment decision in late 2026 or early 2027, Hopkins added. Neither executive nor any of the stock analysts on the call mentioned an independent developer’s proposal to build a 462-MW nuclear power plant in southern Idaho using NuScale’s technology. Sawtooth Energy and Development proposes using six of NuScale’s 77-MW modules to power the plant, according to local news reports and a draft environmental impact statement. Project manager Dan Adamson said in an email last month that the company had “talked with NuScale, and [we] like their equipment and design, but [we have] no written deal as of yet.” A NuScale spokesperson told Utility Dive that “we are not engaged with Sawtooth Energy and Development Corp.” and that NuScale “remains committed to working with our exclusive partner, Entra1, to commercialize, deploy, and distribute” its reactors. The relationship with Entra1 gives end users of NuScale technology more operational flexibility than they would have if they owned and operated their own power plants, Hopkins said Thursday. They can simply purchase power from Entra1 or through a utility, he said. “It’s like buying a computer with an Intel chip,” Hamady added. “We’re the Intel chip inside — in this case, [inside] the power plants” that Entra1 builds and, in some cases, may own and operate, he said. In that sense, it’s more accurate to say Entra1 is NuScale’s customer rather than an end user like a hyperscaler or a utility, Hamady said. “We don’t sell electrons,” he said. Instead, he likened NuScale to an original equipment manufacturer selling a piece of equipment. Recommended Reading What’s next for advanced nuclear technology?	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
2017 National Invitation Tournament The 2017 National Invitation Tournament was a single-elimination tournament of 32 NCAA Division I teams that were not selected to participate in the 2017 NCAA tournament. The annual tournament was played on campus sites in the first three rounds (the host team being the team with the higher seeding), with the semifinals and championship game being held at Madison Square Garden in New York City. The tournament began on Tuesday, March 14 and ended on Thursday, March 30. The NIT Selection Show aired Sunday March 12 on ESPNU. Experimental rules In February 2017, the NCAA approved a number of experimental rule changes for use in this tournament: * Team fouls were reset to zero at the end of every 10-minute segment of each half (officially at 9:59). Similar to women's college basketball, the game was split into quarters for purposes of team fouls, but without a period break. * There were no "one-and-one" foul shots. Instead, starting with the fifth total foul in each 10-minute segment, non-shooting fouls by the defensive team resulted in two free throws, with the only exception being administrative technical fouls. This mirrored foul counting in NCAA women's basketball, which has been played in quarters since the 2015–16 season. * In a feature unique in the college game, but similar to that used by the (W)NBA, overtime was considered a separate period for purposes of accrued team fouls. The team foul limit was three per overtime period, with all non-shooting team fouls thereafter by the defense resulting in two free throws. * The shot clock was reset to 20 seconds when the ball was inbounded in the frontcourt following a foul (similar to the (W)NBA and FIBA, where a shot clock is reset to 14 seconds on such). Automatic qualifiers The following 10 teams were guaranteed berths into the 2017 NIT field when they failed to receive an at-large NCAA bid by virtue of having won their respective conference's regular season championship and failing to win their conference tournaments. At-large bids The following 22 teams were also awarded NIT berths. Schedule The NIT began on Tuesday, March 14. The first three rounds were played at campus sites. The semifinals were held on Tuesday, March 28 and the championship on Thursday, March 30 at Madison Square Garden in New York City. Bracket ^ Indiana Athletic Director Fred Glass declined to host a home game at Simon Skjodt Assembly Hall citing concern it would "devalue" the Hoosiers' home court. † Game played at Texas Southern's Health and Physical Education Arena due to renovations at Hofheinz Pavilion. ^ Game played at UCF due to prior scheduled event at the State Farm Center. Media ESPN, Inc. had exclusive television rights. Games were telecast on ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, or ESPN3. Westwood One had exclusive radio rights to the semifinals and the championship.	WIKI
Macy's to temporarily close all stores due to virus outbreak March 17 (Reuters) - Macy’s Inc on Tuesday joined Nordstrom Inc to temporarily close all of its stores in the United States, due to the coronavirus pandemic. Nordstrom said on Monday it would temporarily shut its stores in the U.S. and Canada and withdrew its fiscal 2020 forecast. Macy’s, which owns over 800 stores, said it would continue to operate its e-commerce sites. Macy’s, along with Saks Fifth Avenue and Gap Inc’s Banana Republic, last week sent notices to shoppers that they were open for business in a move to stem losses due to a steep decline in traffic. The fast-spreading virus, which has killed about a hundred and infected over 4,000 in the United States, has been a big headache for retailers who are already struggling with falling sales due to stiff competition and a shift to online shopping. (Reporting by Nivedita Balu in Bengaluru; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta)	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
Self-aligned gate In semiconductor electronics fabrication technology, a self-aligned gate is a transistor manufacturing approach whereby the gate electrode of a MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) is used as a mask for the doping of the source and drain regions. This technique ensures that the gate is naturally and precisely aligned to the edges of the source and drain. The use of self-aligned gates in MOS transistors is one of the key innovations that led to the large increase in computing power in the 1970s. Self-aligned gates are still used in most modern integrated circuit processes. IC construction Integrated circuits (ICs, or "chips") are produced in a multi-step process that builds up multiple layers on the surface of a disk of silicon known as a "wafer". Each layer is patterned by coating the wafer in photoresist and then exposing it to ultraviolet light being shone through a stencil-like "mask". Depending on the process, the photoresist that was exposed to light either hardens or softens, and in either case, the softer parts are then washed away. The result is a microscopic pattern on the surface of the wafer where a portion of the top layer is exposed while the rest is protected under the remaining photoresist. The wafer is then exposed to a variety of processes that add or remove materials from the portions of the wafer that are unprotected by the photoresist. In one common process, the wafer is heated to around 1000 °C and then exposed to a gas containing a doping material (commonly boron or phosphorus) that changes the electrical properties of the silicon. This allows the silicon to become an electron donor, electron receptor, or near-insulator depending on the type and/or amount of the dopant. In a typical IC this process is used to produce the individual transistors that make up the key elements of an IC. In the MOSFET, the three parts of a transistor are the source, the drain, and the gate (see diagram). The "field effect" in the name refers to changes to the conductivity that occur when a voltage is applied to the gate. The key point is that this electric field can cause the "channel" region separating the source and drain to become the same type as the source-drain, thus turning the transistor "on". Because no current flows from the gate to the drain, the switching energy of a FET is very small compared to earlier bipolar junction transistor types where the gate (or base as it was known) was in-line with the current. Older methodology In early MOSFET fabrication methodologies, the gate was made of aluminum which melts at 660 °C, so it had to be deposited as one of the last steps in the process after all the doping stages had been completed at around 1000 °C. The wafer as a whole is first chosen to have a particular electrical quality as biased either positive, or "p", or negative, "n". In the illustration the base material is "p" (called n-channel or nMOS). A mask is then used to produce areas where the negative "n" sections of the transistors will be placed. The wafer is then heated to around 1000 °C, and exposed to a doping gas that diffuses into the surface of the wafer to produce the "n" sections. A thin layer of insulator material (silicon dioxide) is then grown on top of the wafer. Finally, the gate is patterned on top of the insulating layer in a new photo-lithographic operation. To ensure the gate actually overlaps the underlying source and drain, the gate material has to be wider than the gap between the n sections, typically as much as three times. This wastes space and creates extra capacitance between the gate and the source-drain. This parasitic capacitance requires that the entire chip be driven at high power levels to ensure clean switching which is inefficient. Additionally, the variation in the misalignment of the gate to the underlying source-drain means that there is high chip-to-chip variability even when they are working properly. Self-alignment The self-aligned gate developed in several steps to its present form. Key to the advance was the discovery that heavily doped poly-silicon was conductive enough to replace aluminum. This meant the gate layer could be created at any stage in the multi-step fabrication process. In the self-aligned process, the key gate-insulating layer is formed near the beginning of the process. Then the gate is deposited and patterned on top. Then the source-drains are doped (for poly-silicon the gates are doped simultaneously). The source-drain pattern thus represents only the outside edges of the source and drain, the inside edge of those sections being masked by the gate itself. As a result, the source and drain "self-align" to the gate. Since they are always perfectly positioned, there is no need to make the gate wider than desired, and the parasitic capacitance is greatly reduced. Alignment time and chip-to-chip variability are likewise reduced. After early experimentation with different gate materials using aluminum, molybdenum and amorphous silicon, the semiconductor industry almost universally adopted self-aligned gates made with polycrystalline silicon (poly-silicon), the so-called silicon-gate technology (SGT) or "self-aligned silicon-gate" technology, which had many additional benefits over the reduction of parasitic capacitances. One important feature of SGT was that the transistor was entirely buried under top quality thermal oxide (one of the best insulators known), making it possible to create new device types, not feasible with conventional technology or with self-aligned gates made with other materials. Particularly important are charge-coupled devices (CCD), used for image sensors, and non-volatile memory devices using floating silicon-gate structures. These devices dramatically enlarged the range of functionality that could be achieved with solid state electronics. Certain innovations were required in order to make self-aligned gates: * a new process that would create the gates; * a switch from amorphous silicon to polycrystalline silicon (because amorphous silicon would break where it passed over "steps" in the oxide insulating surface); * a photolithography method for etching polycrystalline silicon; * a method to reduce the impurities present in silicon. Prior to these innovations, self-aligned gates had been demonstrated on metal-gate devices, but their real impact was on silicon-gate devices. History The aluminum-gate MOS process technology started with the definition and doping of the source and drain regions of MOS transistors, followed by the gate mask that defined the thin-oxide region of the transistors. With additional processing steps, an aluminum gate would then be formed over the thin-oxide region completing the device fabrication. Due to the inevitable misalignment of the gate mask with respect to the source and drain mask, it was necessary to have a fairly large overlap area between the gate region and the source and drain regions, to ensure that the thin-oxide region would bridge the source and drain, even under worst-case misalignment. This requirement resulted in gate-to-source and gate-to-drain parasitic capacitances that were large and variable from wafer to wafer, depending on the misalignment of the gate oxide mask with respect with the source and drain mask. The result was an undesirable spread in the speed of the integrated circuits produced, and a much lower speed than theoretically possible if the parasitic capacitances could be reduced to a minimum. The overlap capacitance with the most adverse consequences on performance was the gate-to-drain parasitic capacitance, Cgd, which, by the well-known Miller effect, augmented the gate-to-source capacitance of the transistor by Cgd multiplied by the gain of the circuit to which that transistor was a part. The impact was a considerable reduction in the switching speed of transistors. In 1966, Robert W. Bower realized that if the gate electrode was defined first, it would be possible not only to minimize the parasitic capacitances between gate and source and drain, but it would also make them insensitive to misalignment. He proposed a method in which the aluminum gate electrode itself was used as a mask to define the source and drain regions of the transistor. However, since aluminum could not withstand the high temperature required for the conventional doping of the source and drain junctions, Bower proposed to use ion implantation, a new doping technique still in development at Hughes Aircraft, his employer, and not yet available at other labs. While Bower’s idea was conceptually sound, in practice it did not work, because it was impossible to adequately passivate the transistors, and repair the radiation damage done to the silicon crystal structure by the ion implantation, since these two operations would have required temperatures in excess of the ones survivable by the aluminum gate. Thus his invention provided a proof of principle, but no commercial integrated circuit was ever produced with Bower’s method. A more refractory gate material was needed. In 1967, John C. Sarace and collaborators at Bell Labs replaced the aluminum gate with an electrode made of vacuum-evaporated amorphous silicon and succeeded in building working self-aligned gate MOS transistors. However, the process, as described, was only a proof of principle, suitable only for the fabrication of discrete transistors and not for integrated circuits; and was not pursued any further by its investigators In 1968, the MOS industry was prevalently using aluminum gate transistors with high threshold voltage (HVT) and desired to have a low threshold voltage (LVT) MOS process in order to increase the speed and reduce the power dissipation of MOS integrated circuits. Low threshold voltage transistors with aluminum gate demanded the use of [100] silicon orientation, which however produced too low a threshold voltage for the parasitic MOS transistors (the MOS transistors created when aluminum over the field oxide would bridge two junctions). To increase the parasitic threshold voltage beyond the supply voltage, it was necessary to increase the N-type doping level in selected regions under the field oxide, and this was initially accomplished with the use of a so-called channel-stopper mask, and later with ion implantation. Development of the silicon-gate technology at Fairchild The SGT was the first process technology used to fabricate commercial MOS integrated circuits that was later widely adopted by the entire industry in the 1960s. In late 1967, Tom Klein, working at the Fairchild Semiconductor R&D Labs, and reporting to Les Vadasz, realized that the work function difference between heavily P-type doped silicon and N-type silicon was 1.1 volt lower than the work function difference between aluminum and the same N-type silicon. This meant that the threshold voltage of MOS transistors with silicon gate could be 1.1 volt lower than the threshold voltage of MOS transistors with aluminum gate fabricated on the same starting material. Therefore, one could use starting material with [111] silicon orientation and simultaneously achieve both an adequate parasitic threshold voltage and low threshold voltage transistors without the use of a channel-stopper mask or ion implantation under the field oxide. With P-type doped silicon gate it would therefore be possible not only to create self-aligned gate transistors but also a low threshold voltage process by using the same silicon orientation of the high threshold voltage process. In February 1968, Federico Faggin joined Les Vadasz's group and was put in charge of the development of a low-threshold-voltage, self-aligned gate MOS process technology. Faggin's first task was to develop the precision etching solution for the amorphous silicon gate, and then he created the process architecture and the detailed processing steps to fabricate MOS ICs with silicon gate. He also invented the ‘buried contacts,’ a method to make direct contact between amorphous silicon and silicon junctions, without the use of metal, a technique that allowed a much higher circuit density, particularly for random logic circuits. After validating and characterizing the process using a test pattern he designed, Faggin made the first working MOS silicon-gate transistors and test structures by April 1968. He then designed the first integrated circuit using silicon gate, the Fairchild 3708, an 8-bit analog multiplexer with decoding logic, that had the same functionality of the Fairchild 3705, a metal-gate production IC that Fairchild Semiconductor had difficulty making on account of its rather stringent specifications. The availability of the 3708 in July 1968 provided also a platform to further improve the process during the following months, leading to the shipment of the first 3708 samples to customers in October 1968, and making it commercially available to the general market before the end of 1968. During the period, July to October 1968, Faggin added two additional critical steps to the process: * Replacing the vacuum-evaporated amorphous silicon with poly-crystalline silicon obtained by vapor-phase deposition. This step became necessary since evaporated, amorphous silicon did break where it passed over "steps" in the surface of the oxide. * The use of phosphorus gettering to soak up the impurities, always present in the transistor, causing reliability problems. Phosphorus gettering allowed to considerably reduce the leakage current and to avoid the threshold voltage drift that still plagued MOS technology with aluminum gate (MOS transistors with aluminum gate were not suitable for phosphorus gettering due to the high temperature required). With silicon gate, the long-term reliability of MOS transistors soon reached the level of bipolar ICs removing one major obstacle to the wide adoption of MOS technology. By the end of 1968 the silicon-gate technology had achieved impressive results. Although the 3708 was designed to have approximately the same area as the 3705 to facilitate using the same production tooling as the 3705, it could have been made considerably smaller. Nonetheless, it had superior performance compared with the 3705: it was 5 times faster, it had about 100 times less leakage current, and the on resistance of the large transistors making up the analog switches was 3 times lower. Commercialization at Intel The silicon-gate technology (SGT) was adopted by Intel upon its founding (July 1968), and within a few years became the core technology for the fabrication of MOS integrated circuits worldwide, lasting to this day. Intel was also the first company to develop non-volatile memory using floating silicon-gate transistors. The first memory chip to use silicon-gate technology was the Intel 1101 SRAM (static random-access memory) chip, fabricated in 1968 and demonstrated in 1969. The first commercial single-chip microprocessor, the Intel 4004, was developed by Faggin using his silicon-gate MOS IC technology. Marcian Hoff, Stan Mazor and Masatoshi Shima contributed to the architecture. Original documents on SGT * Bower, RW and Dill, RG (1966). "Insulated gate field effect transistors fabricated using the gate as source-drain mask". IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 1966 * Faggin, F., Klein, T., and Vadasz, L.: "Insulated Gate Field Effect Transistor Integrated Circuits With Silicon Gates". IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington D.C, 1968 * Federico Faggin and Thomas Klein.: "A Faster Generation Of MOS Devices With Low Thresholds Is Riding The Crest Of The New Wave, Silicon-Gate IC’s". Cover story on Fairchild 3708, "Electronics" magazine, September 29, 1969. * F. Faggin, T. Klein "Silicon Gate Technology", "Solid State Electronics", 1970, Vol. 13, pp. 1125–1144. * F. Faggin, T. Klein "Silicon Gate Technology", "Solid State Electronics", 1970, Vol. 13, pp. 1125–1144. * F. Faggin, T. Klein "Silicon Gate Technology", "Solid State Electronics", 1970, Vol. 13, pp. 1125–1144. Patents The self-aligned gate design was patented in 1969 by the team of Kerwin, Klein, and Sarace. It was independently invented by Robert W. Bower (U.S. 3,472,712, issued October 14, 1969, filed October 27, 1966). The Bell Labs Kerwin et al. patent was not filed until March 27, 1967, several months after R. W. Bower and H. D. Dill had published and presented the first publication of this work at the International Electron Device Meeting, Washington, D.C. in 1966. In a legal action involving Bower, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals determined that Kerwin, Klein and Sarace were the inventors of the self-aligned silicon gate transistor. On that basis, they were awarded the basic patent US 3,475,234. Actually the self-aligned gate MOSFET was invented by Robert W. Bower U.S. 3,472,712, issued October 14, 1969, Filed October 27, 1966. The Bell Labs Kerwin et al patent 3,475,234 was not filed until March 27, 1967 several months after the R. W. Bower and H. D. Dill Published and presented the first publication of this work entitled INSULATED GATE FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS FABRICATED USING THE GATE AS SOURCE-DRAIN MASK at the International Electron Device Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1966. Bower's work described the self-aligned-gate MOSFET, made with both aluminum and polysilicon gates. It used both ion implantation and diffusion to form the source and drain using the gate electrode as the mask to define the source and drain regions. The Bell Labs team attended this meeting of the IEDM in 1966, and they discussed this work with Bower after his presentation in 1966. Bower had first made the self-aligned gate using aluminum as the gate and, before presentation in 1966, made the device using polysilicon as the gate. The self-aligned gate typically involves ion implantation, another semiconductor process innovation of the 1960s. The histories of ion implantation and self-aligned gates are highly interrelated, as recounted in an in-depth history by R.B. Fair. The first commercial product using self-aligned silicon-gate technology was the Fairchild 3708 8-bit analog multiplexor, in 1968, designed by Federico Faggin who pioneered several inventions in order to turn the aforementioned non working proofs of concept, into what the industry actually adopted thereafter. Manufacturing process The importance of self-aligned gates comes in the process used to make them. The process of using the gate oxide as a mask for the source and drain diffusion both simplifies the process and greatly improves the yield. Process steps The following are the steps in creating a self-aligned gate: These steps were first created by Federico Faggin and used in the Silicon Gate Technology process developed at Fairchild Semiconductor in 1968 for the fabrication of the first commercial integrated circuit using it, the Fairchild 3708 * 1. Wells on the field oxide are etched where the transistors are to be formed. Each well defines the source, drain, and active gate regions of an MOS transistor. * 2. Using a dry thermal oxidation process, a thin layer (5-200 nm) of gate oxide (SiO2) is grown on the silicon wafer. * 3. Using a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process, a layer of polysilicon is grown on top of the gate oxide. * 4. A layer of photoresist is applied on top of the polysilicon. * 5. A mask is placed on top of the photoresist and exposed to UV light; this breaks down the photoresist layer in areas where the mask didn't protect it. * 6. Photoresist is exposed with a specialized developer solution. This is intended to remove the photoresist that was broken down by the UV light. * 7. The polysilicon and gate oxide that is not covered by photoresist is etched away with a buffered ion etch process. This is usually an acid solution containing hydrofluoric acid. * 8. The rest of the photoresist is stripped from the silicon wafer. There is now a wafer with polysilicon over the gate oxide, and over the field oxide. * 9. The thin oxide is etched away exposing the source and drain regions of the transistor, except in the gate region which is protected by the polysilicon gate. * 10. Using a conventional doping process, or a process called ion-implantation, the source, drain and the polysilicon are doped. The thin oxide under the silicon gate acts as a mask for the doping process. This step is what makes the gate self-aligning. The source and drain regions are automatically properly aligned with the (already in place) gate. * 11. The wafer is annealed in a high temperature furnace (>800 °C). This diffuses the dopant further into the crystal structure to make the source and drain regions and results in the dopant diffusing slightly underneath the gate. * 12. The process continues with vapor deposition of silicon dioxide to protect the exposed areas, and with all the remaining steps to complete the process.	WIKI
Instacart is teaming with Postmates for delivery support in San Fransisco Instacart is teaming up with Postmates to deliver groceries during its busiest hours, reports TechCrunch. The pilot program, which delivers groceries during the late morning and early afternoon, will launch in San Fransisco, with no immediate plans to expand them into other cities. Instacart reportedly says it’s “considering” bringing the program further to possibly include other delivery services in the launch. This is in line with Postmates’ recent steps toward expanding its delivery fleets, following a recent partnership with Walmart to extend grocery-delivering services for stores in Charlotte, North Carolina. For Postmates, this could be a way to supplement local businesses that can’t afford to hire more delivery people. “We definitely see this as a bigger part of Postmates’ future,” Postmates SVP Dan Mosher told TechCrunch. “Most brands are moving toward a world where they want to provide quick convenient delivery but they don’t have the capabilities. As we scale, we have the delivery density to drive economics in a really cost-effective way, not only to restaurants and retailers but to other on-demand services as well.”	NEWS-MULTISOURCE
REST API Explorer AM provides an online AM REST API reference that can be accessed through the AM administration console. It displays the REST API endpoints that allow client applications to access AM's services. Tip The API Explorer is enabled by default. To disable it in production environments, navigate to Configure > Global Services > REST APIs, and select Disabled in the API Descriptors drop-down list. The key features of the API Explorer are the following: • API Versioning. The API Explorer displays the different API versions available depending on your deployment. API Explorer API Explorer page, which is accessible from the AM console. • Detailed Information. The API Explorer provides an Expand Operations button for each available CRUDPAQ method. When Expand Operations is pressed, you can view implementation notes, successful response class, headers, parameters, and response messages with examples. For example, the requestPayload field can be populated with an example value. Also, if you select Model, you can view the schema for each parameter, as seen below: API Explorer Request Payload The API Explorer page provides a Try It Out function that allows you to see the possible responses to an example request. • Try It Out. The API Explorer also provides a Try It Out feature, which allows you to send a sample request to the endpoint and view the possible responses. API Explorer Detailed Information The API Explorer page displays detailed information for each method. Note the following when using the Try It Out feature in the API Explorer: • The example payload values are auto-generated, and whilst they may be the correct data type, their value may not be corect for the API to function correctly. Check the Model tab for a description of the value required, and replace the example values before sending the REST request to AM. • Endpoints in the API Explorer are hard-coded to point to the top-level realm. You must adjust either the domain, or the path in the request if you need to target a different realm. For more information, see Specifying Realms in REST API Calls. To Access the API Explorer 1. Log into the AM console as an administrator. 2. You can access the API Explorer in one of two ways: Point your browser to the following URL: https://openam.example.com:8443/openam/ui-admin/#api/explorer/applications You can also click the help icon in the top-right corner, and then click API Explorer. API Explorer API Explorer page, which is also accessible from the help icon on the AM console. Read a different version of :	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Turner's syndrome what is Turner's syndrome? Turner's syndrome is a chromosomal disorder in which a female is only born with one chromosome. a brief summary This condition occurs in 1 in 2,500 newborn girls in the US. Turner's syndrome has very little relevance to specific populations. There are not many public figures have Turner's Syndrome. Actress Linda Hunt, gymnast Missy Marlowe both have Turner's Syndrome. What are the symptoms? The mutation starts during fetal development. The symptoms include short stature, droopy eyelids, absence of menstruation. Women are typically born with two x chromosomes while women with Turner's Syndrome are born with 1. The body would function normally with 2. what type of Mutation is it? is it inherited? Turner's Syndrome is caused by nondisjunction. This is when a pair of sex chromosomes fail to separate. When the sperm with no X chromosome unites with a normal egg to form an embryo, that embryo will just have one X chromosome. As the cells divide the X chromosome will be missing from every part of the body. The abnormality is not inherited because women with the syndrome are sterile and cant have kids. what are the treatments? Most individuals require female hormone therapy to promote development of secondary sexual characteristics and menstruation. Experts recommend therapy at the start of puberty. Girls and women with Turner's Syndrome should be treated to protect their bones from osteoporosis. On the physical aspect of it you could get surgery to get rid of the webbing of the neck. Final adult height could be increased by growth hormones given to them during their childhood.	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Talk:Full-mold casting Same article This article is exactly almost exactly the same as Lost-foam casting. Either these needs to be merged or more information is required to differentiate them. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 19:53, 10 April 2014 (UTC) * I don't know if these two articles explain it, but the difference is that full mould casting uses a bonded sand, usually with a coating of a refractory investment first, lost foam uses an unbonded sand. * I expect that you can find sources, of varying credibility, to define either term in any way you like. Certainly lost foam is sometimes used as a blanket term for both. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)	WIKI
Effect of curing history on the residual stress behavior of polyimide thin films Hyunsoo Chung, Yungil Joe, Haksoo Han Research output: Contribution to journalArticle 28 Citations (Scopus) Abstract The effect of curing history on the residual stress behavior in semiflexible structure poly(4,4′-oxydiphenylene pyromellitimide) (PMDA-ODA) and rigid structure poly(p-phenylene biphenyltetracarboximide) (BPDA-PDA) polyimide was investigated. Depending upon the curing history and different structures of polyimide, the residual stress behaviors and the morphology of polyimide thin films were detected in situ by using a wafer bending technique and wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), respectively. For the rigid structure BPDA-PDA polyimide, the residual stress and the slope decreased from 11.7 MPa and 0.058 MPa/°C to 4.2 MPa and 0.007 MPa/°C as the curing temperature increased, and the annealing process is done. However, for the semiflexible structure PMDA-ODA, the change of the residual stress and the slope was relatively not significant. In addition, it was found that the cured polyimide prepared at a higher temperature with a multistep curing process showed a higher order of chain in-plain orientation and packing order than does the polyimide film prepared at a lower temperature with a one-step curing process. These residual stress behaviors of polyimide thin films show good agreement with WAXD results, such as polyimide chain order, orientation, and intermolecular packing order, due to curing history. Specifically, it shows that the effect of curing history on residual stress as well as morphological change was significant in rigid BPDA-PDA polyimide but, not in semiflexible PMDA-ODA polyimide. Therefore, it suggests that the morphological structure depends upon curing history, and the polyimide backbone structure might be one of important factors to lead the low residual stress in polyimide thin films. Original languageEnglish Pages (from-to)3287-3298 Number of pages12 JournalJournal of Applied Polymer Science Volume74 Issue number14 DOIs Publication statusPublished - 1999 Jan 1 All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes • Chemistry(all) • Surfaces, Coatings and Films • Polymers and Plastics • Materials Chemistry Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of curing history on the residual stress behavior of polyimide thin films'. Together they form a unique fingerprint. • Cite this	ESSENTIALAI-STEM
Page:Under Dewey at Manila.djvu/310 276 him on the trip, but the tall down-easter declined. "This jest suits me to death, Larry," he said. "I wouldn't miss a day of it for a fortune. Don't you forget to come back; I'll be a-watchin' for you." And an affectionate parting followed, for both had grown to think a great deal of each other. The trip on the McCulloch to Hong Kong occupied several days, but with nothing happening out of the ordinary. As the stanch despatch boat came in sight of the numerous shipping at the Chinese-English port, Larry kept his eyes wide open for a possible sight of the Columbia. He had just about given up hope, when he caught a glimpse of a hull which looked strangely familiar. "Will you lend me your glass for just a moment?" he asked of a news correspondent standing by. "I think that's my ship over to our port." The glasses were cheerfully loaned, and one look convinced Larry that he was right. There was the Columbia, somewhat battered around the bow and with her foremast still missing, and there, yes, there were Captain Ponsberry and Tom Grandon on her deck! "Columbia, ahoy!" he yelled at the top of his	WIKI
Page:Science and Health.djvu/292 288 by living consistent with that prayer. If selfishness gives place in us to Love, we shall love our neighbor and bless them that curse us, but can never meet this great demand by asking for it; there is a cross to be taken up, before the reward is given. Do we “love the Lord our God with all our heart, Soul, and strength?” This includes much, even the surrender of all personal affections and personal worship; it is the ultimate of being, the science of Life that recognizes only the consciousness, Spirit, wherein Soul is our Master, and sense without a claim. Are you willing to leave all for Christ, Truth, and be reckoned with sinners? Have you reached this point? No. Do you really desire to attain it? No. Then wherefore make long prayers about it, and ask to become Christ-like, when these are the footsteps of our dear Master; if unwilling to drink his cup, wherefore pray with the lips to be partakers of it? The only consistent prayer is, to do right so far as we understand the right, and to walk in the light so far as we receive it, even though it be with bleeding footsteps, and let our real desires and works be rewarded by the Father who seeth in secret. The whole world will not understand Christianity for centuries to come. When we are good enough to take His cup of earthly sorrows, we shall have it, and until we are, and do drink of it, all the vain repetitions that heathen use can never reach the demonstration that Jesus gave and instructed his followers to give, as the test of Christianity, saying, “And these signs shall follow you.” We learn in science the necessity for Christians to suffer in this wicked world of sense, insomuch as they oppose it, and are	WIKI
In the Orange Room, the teachers have been documenting the risky play that takes place, particularly on the playground. Risky play opportunities allow children to explore what they are comfortable doing, try new things and push their capabilities in ways that offer risk without danger as a teacher guides and supports the play. One part of our playground that the children explore over and over is a bench with two ramps. One ramp is flat, but thin (so it bounces) and is narrow at one end. The other has a curved bottom so it is a little unpredictable as it may wobble as the children walk on it. The children have been working on going up and down the ramps, choosing to crawl or walk, alone or holding a hand if desired. As the children have become more comfortable and coordinated, they have changed the way they explore this area. Some run or bounce up and down the ramps and there have been a few times when someone has pushed a wagon or lawnmower up and down. Recently, the children began trying to take bikes and wagons up and down the ramps with a lot of supervision from a nearby teacher. They had to work very hard to figure out how to get the heavy bikes up the narrow end of the ramp. Could they ride it? Did they have to lift it? Could they do it alone or did they need help? And what would they do when they got to the top? One student tried taking both wagons and bikes up and down the ramps and was most determined to get up one ramp, across the bench and back down the other ramp. With a teacher nearby, he figured out that he could not get the bike across the bench or onto the other ramp and settled into working with a wagon. However, with the wagon he could complete the circuit. After going around a couple of times, he helped others get up the ramp and then left the area. Another student wanted to get a red bike up the ramp very badly. He didn’t seem comfortable trying to ride it up, so worked from the side to lift it. He had a hard time as the front wheel kept turning and steered the bike off the side of the ramp. He asked for help and other children and teachers helped him at different times. He worked so hard and got a little frustrated when things didn’t work as he wanted, but persisted in his efforts. A third student figured out that he could ride a bike up if he lifted it by the handlebars to get over the narrow part of the ramp. He tried to ride on top of the bench, but quickly figured out that it wouldn’t work. After a few trials, he settled on a routine: ride the bike up, climb off, and push the bike over the edge of the bench to make it land on the ground. This took a lot of strength and coordination, but he mastered it. It was amazing to see this group of children work at a task that they set for themselves. The bikes are very heavy and I’m sure that it felt precarious to try to get them up on the ramps and benches. Each child found ways to accomplish what they wanted in ways that felt safe to them, ways that were unique to each child. Reflection by Andrea Tallacksen and Abby DeLong, Orange Room Co-teachers You must be logged in to post a comment.	FINEWEB-EDU

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.