cik stringclasses 1
value | date stringlengths 8 8 | form stringclasses 4
values | sentenceCount int64 0 2.33k | sentence stringlengths 2 5.25k | filename stringlengths 40 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 651 | On November 19, 2007, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 652 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on December 19, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 653 | Defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint on January 25, 2008. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 654 | The motions to dismiss were originally scheduled to be heard on April 4, 2008. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 655 | Pursuant to a joint stipulation filed on April 3, 2008, the Court vacated the hearing date. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 656 | No new hearing date is currently set. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 657 | In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 658 | Derivative Litigation (formerly Plumbers and Pipefitters v. Jobs, et al. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 659 | and Related Actions) (State Action); Boston Retirement Board v. Apple Computer, Inc.
On July 5, 2006, a putative derivative action captioned Plumbers and Pipefitters v. Jobs, et. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 660 | al., was filed in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 661 | A number of related actions were filed in the subsequent weeks, and have been consolidated into a single action captioned In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 662 | Derivative Litigation, No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 663 | 1:06CV066692, assigned to the Hon. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 664 | Joseph Huber. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 665 | These actions purport to assert claims on behalf of the Company against several current and former executive officers and members of the Board of Directors alleging
improper backdating of stock option grants to maximize certain defendants’ profits, failing to properly account for and take tax deductions for those grant... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 666 | The Company is named as a nominal defendant. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 667 | A consolidated complaint was filed on October 5, 2006, alleging a variety of causes of action under California law, including claims for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of the California Corporations Code, abuse of control, accounting, constructive trust, rescission, deceit, gross mismanagement a... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 668 | On December 7, 2006, the Court granted the Company’s motion to stay these actions. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 669 | On November 3, 2006, the Boston Retirement Board, a purported shareholder, filed a petition for writ of mandate against the Company in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara (Boston Retirement Board v. Apple Computer Inc.). | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 670 | The petition sought to compel the Company to allow inspection of certain corporate records relating to the Company’s option practices and the Special Committee’s investigation. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 671 | Following a trial held on September 24, 2007, the Court granted the petition for inspection but narrowed the scope of the records to be produced. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 672 | On April 16, 2008, the Boston Retirement Board filed a derivative action in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 673 | In re Apple iPod Nano Products Liability Litigation (formerly Wimmer v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Moschella, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Calado, et al. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 674 | v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Kahan, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Jennings, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Rappel v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Mayo v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Valencia v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Williamson v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Sioson v. Apple Computer, Inc.
Beginning on October 19, 2005, eight complaints w... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 675 | The federal actions were coordinated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and assigned to the Hon. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 676 | Ronald Whyte pursuant to an April 17, 2006 order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 677 | Plaintiffs filed a First Consolidated and Amended Master Complaint on September 21, 2006, alleging violations of California and other states’ consumer protection and warranty laws and claiming unjust enrichment. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 678 | The Master Complaint alleges two putative plaintiff classes: (1) all U.S. residents (excluding California residents) who purchased an iPod nano that was not manufactured or designed using processes necessary to ensure normal resistance to scratching of the screen; and (2) all iPod nano purchasers other than U.S. reside... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 679 | The Company answered the Master Complaint on November 20, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 680 | The two California State Court actions were coordinated on May 4, 2006, and assigned to the Hon. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 681 | Carl West in Los Angeles Superior Court. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 682 | Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint on June 8, 2006, alleging violations of California state consumer protection, unfair competition, false advertising and warranty laws and claiming unjust enrichment. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 683 | The Consolidated Complaint alleges a putative plaintiff class of all California residents who own an iPod nano containing a manufacturing defect that results in the nano being susceptible to excessive scratching. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 684 | The Company answered the Consolidated Amended Complaint on October 6, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 685 | The Court has scheduled the class certification hearing on the purported consumer class for September 26, 2008. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 686 | Two similar complaints, Carpentier v. Apple Canada, Inc., and Royer-Brennan v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc. were filed in Montreal, Quebec, Canada on October 27, 2005 and November 9, 2005, respectively, seeking authorization to institute class actions on behalf of iPod nano purchasers in Quebec. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 687 | The Royer-Brennan file was stayed in May 2006 in favor of the Carpentier file. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 688 | A similar complaint, Mund v. Apple Canada Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc., was filed in Ontario, Canada on January 9, 2006 seeking authorization to institute a class action on behalf of iPod nano purchasers in Canada. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 689 | Apple Canada Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc. have served Notices of Intent to Defend. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 690 | Individual Networks, LLC v. Apple, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 691 | Plaintiff filed this action against the Company on April 24, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 692 | 7,117,516, entitled “Method and System for Providing a Customized Media List.” Plaintiff alleges certain features of the iTunes store infringe the patent. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 693 | The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 694 | The Company filed an answer on July 2, 2007, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 695 | The Company also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity, as well as a counterclaim against Individual Networks LLC for infringement of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 696 | 5,724,567. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 697 | The Markman hearing is set for October 8, 2008, and trial is scheduled for November 9, 2009. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 698 | The Company has filed a petition with the United States Patent and Trademark Office requesting reexamination of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 699 | 7,117,516. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 700 | Lenzi v. Apple Canada, Inc.; Wolfe v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc.; Hirst v. Apple Canada, Inc.; Hamilton v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 701 | Plaintiff filed a purported class action on June 7, 2005, in Superior Court, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada allegedly on behalf of Quebec customers claiming false advertising and breach of warranty relating to iPod battery life. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 702 | Plaintiff sought authorization to institute a class action on behalf of Generations 1, 2 and 3 iPod owners in Quebec. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 703 | On February 2, 2006, the Court dismissed plaintiff’s motion for authorization to institute a class action. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 704 | Plaintiff appealed this ruling. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 705 | The Company has reached a settlement of this matter and the parties have obtained final court approval for the settlement in Quebec. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 706 | Settlement of this matter will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or operating results. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 707 | Two similar complaints relative to iPod battery life, Wolfe v. Apple and Hirst v. Apple, were filed in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on August 15, 2005 and September 12, 2005, respectively. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 708 | Counsel subsequently amended the complaint, now called Waddell vs. Apple. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 709 | The Waddell lawsuit is brought on behalf of all Canadian purchasers other than Quebec purchasers. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 710 | On January 17, 2006, the Company filed its statement of defence to the Waddell complaint. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 711 | In addition, a similar complaint regarding iPod battery life, Hamilton v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc. was filed in Calgary, Alberta, Canada on October 5, 2005, purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of iPods in Alberta, Canada. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 712 | The complaint was served on September 27, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 713 | The Company has reached a settlement of these matters and the parties have obtained final court approval for the settlement in Ontario and Alberta. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 714 | Settlement of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or operating results. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 715 | Macadam v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Santos v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 716 | The Macadam action was filed in late 2002 in Santa Clara County Superior Court asserting various causes of action including breach of contract, fraud, negligent and intentional interference with economic relationship, negligent misrepresentation, trade libel, unfair competition and false advertising. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 717 | The complaint requested unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 718 | The Company filed an answer on December 3, 2004 denying all allegations and asserting numerous defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 719 | On October 1, 2003, Macadam was deauthorized as an Apple reseller. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 720 | Macadam filed a motion for a temporary order to reinstate it as a reseller, which the Court denied. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 721 | The Court denied Macadam’s motion for a preliminary injunction on December 19, 2003. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 722 | On December 6, 2004, Macadam filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Northern District of California, which placed a stay on the litigation as to Macadam. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 723 | The Company filed a claim in the bankruptcy proceedings on February 16, 2005. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 724 | The Macadam bankruptcy case was converted to Chapter 7 (liquidation) on April 29, 2005. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 725 | The Company has reached a settlement of Macadam’s claims against the Company with the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 726 | The Bankruptcy Court approved the settlement on July 17, 2006 over the objection of Tom Santos, Macadam’s principal. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 727 | Santos appealed the ruling approving the settlement, but the District Court denied the appeal. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 728 | Santos has appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 729 | On December 19, 2005, Tom Santos filed a Fifth Amended Complaint on his own behalf (not on behalf of Macadam) alleging fraud, violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising) and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 730 | The Company filed a demurrer to Santos’ amended complaint and a special motion to strike the defamation cause of action on January 20, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 731 | The Court sustained the demurrer in part but denied the special motion to strike. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 732 | Santos filed a Sixth Amended Complaint on July 14, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 733 | The Company filed a demurrer, which was sustained on September 9, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 734 | Santos filed a Seventh Amended Complaint in late September 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 735 | The Company filed a motion to strike, which was granted in part and denied in part on December 15, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 736 | Santos filed an Eighth Amended Complaint on January 29, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 737 | The Company filed a demurrer, which was heard on May 7, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 738 | The court sustained the demurrer, and Santos filed a Ninth Amended Complaint on July 11, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 739 | The Company filed a demurrer, which was overruled. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 740 | The Company’s answer to the Ninth Amended Complaint is not yet due. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 741 | The Company also filed a cross complaint against Santos on January 20, 2006 alleging violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 and California Penal Code §502, fraud and deceit and breach of contract. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 742 | Mediostream, Inc. v. Acer America Corp. et al. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 743 | Plaintiff filed this action against the Company, Acer America Corp., Dell, Inc. and Gateway, Inc. on August 28, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 744 | 7,009,655, entitled “Method and System for Direct Recording of Video Information onto a Disk Medium.” An amended complaint was served on November 7, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 745 | The amended complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 746 | On January 25, 2008, the Company filed an answer to the complaint denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses and also filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 747 | OPTi Inc. v. Apple Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 748 | Plaintiff filed this action against the Company on January 16, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 749 | 5,710,906, 5,813,036 and 6,405,291, all entitled “Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 750 | The Company filed an answer on April 17, 2007 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.