cik stringclasses 1
value | date stringlengths 8 8 | form stringclasses 4
values | sentenceCount int64 0 2.33k | sentence stringlengths 2 5.25k | filename stringlengths 40 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 751 | The Company also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 752 | The Markman hearing is set for November 26, 2008, and trial is scheduled for April 6, 2009. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 753 | Quantum Technology Management, Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 754 | Plaintiff filed this action on December 21, 2005 in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against the Company and Fingerworks, Ltd., alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 755 | 5,730,165 entitled “Time Domain Capacitive Field Detector.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 756 | On May 11, 2006, Quantum filed an amended complaint adding Cypress Semiconductor/MicroSystems, Inc. as a defendant. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 757 | On July 31, 2006, the Company filed an answer denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses and also filed counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 758 | On November 30, 2006, plaintiff filed a reply to the Company’s counterclaims and a More Definite Statement. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 759 | A Markman hearing was held on May 16, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 760 | On June 7, 2007, the Court issued a claim construction ruling, and also issued an order invalidating six of plaintiff’s asserted patent claims in response to the Company’s motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 761 | On November 28, 2007, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment for non-infringement and invalidity, and a motion for summary judgment related to Quantum’s state-law claims. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 762 | On December 27, 2007, Quantum filed a motion for summary judgment for infringement on one patent claim. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 763 | In March 2008, Quantum was acquired by Atmel Corporation. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 764 | Trial is scheduled for October 27, 2008. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 765 | Saito Shigeru Kenchiku Kenkyusho (Shigeru Saito Architecture Institute) v. iPod; Apple Japan Inc. v. Shigeru Saito Architecture Institute
Plaintiff Saito filed a petition in the Japan Customs Office in Tokyo on January 23, 2007 alleging infringement by the Company of Japanese Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 766 | 3852854, entitled “Touch Operation Input Device and Electronic Parts Thereof.” The petition sought an order barring the importation into Japan of fifth generation iPods and second generation iPod nanos. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 767 | The Customs Office held a hearing on March 22, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 768 | The Customs Office rejected the petition to bar importation and dismissed plaintiff’s case. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 769 | Apple Japan, Inc. filed a Declaratory Judgment action against Saito on February 6, 2007 in the Tokyo District Court, seeking a declaration that the ‘854 patent is invalid and not infringed. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 770 | Saito filed a Counter Complaint for infringement seeking damages. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 771 | SP Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 772 | Plaintiff filed this action against the Company on August 2, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 773 | 6,784,873 entitled “Method and Medium for Computer Readable Keyboard Display Incapable of User Termination.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 774 | The Company filed an answer on October 23, 2007 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 775 | The Company also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 776 | On February 11, 2008, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, alleging infringement of an additional patent, U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 777 | 6,987,986 entitled “Cellular Telephone, Personal Digital Assistant with Dual Lines for Simultaneous Uses.” The Company filed an answer to the amended complaint on February 29, 2008, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 778 | The Company also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 779 | The Company has reached a settlement of this matter. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 780 | Settlement of this matter will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or operating results. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 781 | St-Germain v. Apple Canada, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 782 | Plaintiff filed this case in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, on August 5, 2005, seeking authorization to institute a class action for the refund by the Company of the Canadian Private Copying Levy that was applied to the iPod purchase price in Quebec between December 12, 2003 and December 14, 2004 but later declared invalid ... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 783 | The Company has completed a refund program for this levy. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 784 | A class certification hearing took place January 13, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 785 | On February 24, 2006, the Court granted class certification and notice was published during the last week of March 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 786 | The trial was conducted on October 15 and 16, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 787 | On January 11, 2008, the Court issued a ruling in plaintiff’s favor. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 788 | The Court ruled that despite the Company’s good faith efforts with the levy refund program, the Company must pay the amount claimed, and that the class is comprised of 20,000 persons who purchased an iPod in Quebec between December 12, 2003 and December 14, 2004. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 789 | The Court ordered the Company to submit a statement of account showing the amount received by the Canadian Private Copying Collective, and the amount that has already been paid to class members in Quebec under the Company’s levy refund program. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 790 | The Court also ordered the parties to submit further briefing regarding the collective recovery award by February 23, 2008. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 791 | On February 11, 2008, the Company filed an appeal. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 792 | Texas MP3 Technologies Ltd v. Apple Inc. et al. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 793 | Plaintiff filed this action against the Company and other defendants on February 16, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 794 | 7,065,417 entitled “MPEG Portable Sound Reproducing System and A Reproducing Method Thereof.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 795 | On July 12, 2007, the Company filed a petition for reexamination of the patent, which the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 796 | Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 1, 2007, adding the iPhone as an accused device. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 797 | On August 2, 2007, the Company filed a motion to stay the litigation pending the outcome of the reexamination, which the Court denied. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 798 | The Company filed an answer on August 20, 2007, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 799 | The Company also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 800 | The Markman hearing is set for March 12, 2009, and trial is scheduled for July 6, 2009. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 801 | The Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation (formerly Charoensak v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Tucker v. Apple Computer, Inc.); Somers v. Apple Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 802 | The first-listed action is a consolidated case combining two cases previously pending under the names Charoensak v. Apple Computer Inc. (formerly Slattery v. Apple Computer Inc.) and Tucker v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 803 | The original plaintiff (Slattery) in the Charoensak case filed a purported class action on January 3, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging various claims including alleged unlawful tying of music purchased on the iTunes Store with the purchase of iPods and unlawful a... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 804 | Plaintiff’s complaint alleged violations of §§1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 805 | §§1 and 2), California Business & Professions Code §16700 et seq. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 806 | (the Cartwright Act), California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), common law unjust enrichment and common law monopolization. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 807 | Plaintiff sought unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 808 | The Company filed a motion to dismiss on February 10, 2005. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 809 | On September 9, 2005, the Court denied the motion in part and granted it in part. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 810 | Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 23, 2005 and the Company filed an answer on October 18, 2005. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 811 | In August 2006, the Court dismissed Slattery without prejudice and allowed plaintiffs to file an amended complaint naming two new plaintiffs (Charoensak and Rosen). | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 812 | On November 2, 2006, the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 813 | The Tucker case was filed as a purported class action on July 21, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging various claims including alleged unlawful tying of music and videos purchased on the iTunes Store with the purchase of iPods and vice versa and unlawful acquisition... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 814 | The complaint alleges violations of §§1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 815 | §§1 and 2), California Business & Professions Code §16700 et seq. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 816 | (the Cartwright Act), California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 817 | Plaintiff sought unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 818 | On November 3, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 819 | On December 20, 2006, the Court denied the motion to dismiss. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 820 | On January 11, 2007, The Company filed an answer denying all material allegations and asserting numerous defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 821 | On March 20, 2007, the Court consolidated the two cases. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 822 | Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on April 19, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 823 | On June 6, 2007, the Company filed an answer to the consolidated complaint denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 824 | The Court has scheduled the class certification hearing for November 7, 2008. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 825 | A related class action complaint, Somers v. Apple Inc., was filed on December 31, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging various claims including alleged unlawful tying of music and videos purchased on the iTunes Store with the purchase of iPods and vice versa and unl... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 826 | The complaint alleges violations of §§1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 827 | §§1 and 2), California Business & Professions Code §16700 et seq. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 828 | (the Cartwright Act), California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 829 | Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 830 | On February 21, 2008, the Company filed an answer denying all material allegations and asserting numerous defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 831 | The Court has scheduled the class certification hearing for November 7, 2008. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 832 | Tse v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 833 | Plaintiff Ho Keung Tse filed this action against the Company and other defendants on August 5, 2005 in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 834 | 6,665,797 entitled “Protection of Software Again [sic] Against Unauthorized Use.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 835 | The Company filed an answer on October 31, 2005 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 836 | On October 28, 2005, the Company and the other defendants filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California, which was granted on August 31, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 837 | On July 24, 2007, the Company filed a petition for reexamination of the patent, which the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 838 | On July 25, 2007, the Company filed a motion to stay the litigation pending the outcome of the reexamination, which the Court granted on October 4, 2007. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 839 | Union Fédérale des Consummateurs - Que Choisir v. Apple Computer France S.à.r.l. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 840 | and iTunes S.à.r.l. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 841 | Plaintiff, a consumer association in France, filed this complaint on February 9, 2005 alleging that the above-listed entities are violating consumer law by (1) omitting to mention that the iPod is allegedly not compatible with music from online music services other than the iTunes Store and that the music from the iTun... | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 842 | Plaintiff seeks damages, injunctive relief and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 843 | The first hearing on the case took place on May 24, 2005. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 844 | The Company’s response to the complaint was served on November 8, 2005. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 845 | Plaintiff’s responsive pleading was filed on February 10, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 846 | The Company filed a reply on June 6, 2006 and UFC filed a response on September 19, 2006. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 847 | Vitt v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 848 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action on November 7, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of the iBook G4 alleging that the computer’s logic board fails at an abnormally high rate. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 849 | The complaint alleges violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20080723 | 10-Q | 850 | Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001193125-08-156421/full-submission.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.