cik stringclasses 1
value | date stringlengths 8 8 | form stringclasses 4
values | sentenceCount int64 0 2.33k | sentence stringlengths 2 5.25k | filename stringlengths 40 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 850 | A demurrer that the Company filed to the third amended complaint as well as a motion to disqualify the Company’s lawyers will be heard on January 30, 2007. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 851 | Baghdasarian, et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 852 | v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 853 | Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 854 | The complaint alleges that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 855 | The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 856 | The complaint seeks damages and equitable remedies. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 857 | On December 15, 2005, the Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 858 | The parties have reached a tentative settlement, which is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 859 | Barry et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 860 | v. Apple Computer, Inc.
Two Plaintiffs filed this purported class action on May 16, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on behalf of a nationwide class of iPod purchasers between May 2002 and the present. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 861 | The complaint alleged various problems with the iPod hard drive, including skipping and limited lifespan. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 862 | Plaintiffs alleged violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and breach of warranties. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 863 | The complaint sought damages and equitable relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 864 | The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this case, without prejudice, on September 18, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 865 | Birdsong v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Patterson v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 866 | These federal court complaints allege that the Company’s iPod music players, and the ear bud headphones sold with them, are inherently defective in design and are sold without adequate warnings concerning the risk of noise-induced hearing loss by iPod users. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 867 | The Birdsong action was initially filed on January 30, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana on behalf of a purported Louisiana class of iPod purchasers and alleges violations of the Louisiana Products Liability Act, breaches of implied warranties, unjust enrichment, and neglige... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 868 | The Patterson action was filed on January 31, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a purported class of all iPod purchasers within the four-year period before January 31, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 869 | That action alleged breaches of implied and express warranties, violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, breaches of express and implied warranties, negligent
misrepresentation an... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 870 | The Birdsong action was transferred to the Northern District of California, and the Patterson action was dismissed. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 871 | An amended complaint was subsequently filed in Birdsong, dropping the Louisiana law-based claims and adding California law-based claims equivalent to those in Patterson. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 872 | The Company filed a motion to dismiss on November 3, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 873 | Plaintiffs will not oppose the motion but instead will file a second amended complaint by January 15, 2007. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 874 | A similar complaint, Royer-Brennan v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc., was filed in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, on February 1, 2006, seeking authorization to institute a class action on behalf of iPod purchasers in Quebec. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 875 | A hearing on the motion for class certification is scheduled for February 8 and 9, 2007, although Plaintiff counsel has now requested that the hearing be delayed pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss in the U.S. case. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 876 | Branning et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 877 | v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 878 | Plaintiffs originally filed this purported class action in San Francisco County Superior Court on February 17, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 879 | The initial complaint alleged violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and violation of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) regarding a variety of purportedly unfair and unlawful conduct including, but not limited to, allegedly selling used computers as new and failing to hono... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 880 | Plaintiffs also brought causes of action for misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 881 | Plaintiffs requested unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 882 | On May 9, 2005, the Court granted the Company’s motion to transfer the case to Santa Clara County Superior Court. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 883 | On May 2, 2005, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding two new named plaintiffs and three new causes of action including a claim for treble damages under the Cartwright Act (California Business & Professions Code §16700 et seq.) | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 884 | and a claim for false advertising. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 885 | The Company filed a demurrer to the amended complaint, which the Court sustained in its entirety on November 10, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 886 | The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend and they filed an amended complaint on December 29, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 887 | Plaintiffs’ amended complaint added three plaintiffs and alleged many of the same factual claims as the previous complaints, such as alleged selling of used equipment as new, alleged failure to honor warranties and service contracts for the consumer plaintiffs, and alleged fraud related to the opening of the Apple reta... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 888 | Plaintiffs continued to assert causes of action for unfair competition (§17200), violations of the CLRA, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, violations of the Cartwright Act and alleged new causes of action for fraud, conversion and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 889 | The Company filed a demurrer to the amended complaint on January 31, 2006, which the Court sustained on March 3, 2006 on sixteen of seventeen causes of action. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 890 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding one new plaintiff. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 891 | The Company filed a demurrer, which was granted in part on September 9, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 892 | Plaintiffs filed a further amended complaint on September 21, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 893 | On October 2, 2006, the Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 894 | The case is in discovery. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 895 | Butzer, et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 896 | v. Apple Computer, Inc.;Wirges v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Blackwell v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 897 | Plaintiffs filed the Butzer action on August 23, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of the Company’s PowerBook G4 portable computers. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 898 | The complaint alleged defects in the memory of the computers. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 899 | The complaint alleged that this purported defect extends to other series of the Company’s portables and stated that plaintiffs reserved the right to amend the complaint to include these other series. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 900 | Plaintiffs asserted claims for alleged violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) and the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 901 | The complaint sought remedies including restitution and/or damages and injunctive relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 902 | The Wirges action was filed on January 20, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, also on behalf of a purported nationwide class, and made similar allegations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 903 | Plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of warranties, violation of the Magnuson-Moss Act, strict products liability and unjust enrichment. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 904 | The complaint sought restitution, damages and other remedies. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 905 | The Blackwell action was filed on February 10, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, on behalf of a purported nationwide class, and made identical allegations to those made in the Butzer case. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 906 | Plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of express and implied warranties, violation of the CLRA, violation of the Song-Beverly Act, false advertising and unfair competition. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 907 | The complaint sought restitution, an injunction and other remedies. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 908 | The Company filed an answer to the Butzer complaint on October 19, 2005 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 909 | The Company filed an answer to the Wirges action on February 28, 2006, and also filed a motion to transfer the Wirges case to the Northern District of California. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 910 | The Company filed an answer to the Blackwell complaint on March 15, 2006 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 911 | The Company has reached a settlement with the named plaintiffs in all three cases and these matters are concluded. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 912 | Settlement of these matters did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 913 | Charoensak v. Apple Computer, Inc. (formerly Slattery v. Apple Computer, Inc.)
The original Plaintiff (Slattery) filed this purported class action on January 3, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging various claims including alleged unlawful tying of music purchased on... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 914 | Plaintiff’s complaint alleged violations of §§1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 915 | §§1 and 2), California Business and Professions Code §16700 et seq. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 916 | (the Cartwright Act), California Business and Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), common law unjust enrichment and common law monopolization. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 917 | Plaintiff sought unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 918 | The Company filed a motion to dismiss on February 10, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 919 | On September 9, 2005, the Court denied the motion in part and granted it in part. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 920 | Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 23, 2005 and the Company filed an answer on October 18, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 921 | On May 8, 2006, the Court heard Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to substitute two new plaintiffs for Slattery. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 922 | In August 2006, the court dismissed Slattery without prejudice and allowed plaintiffs to file an amended complaint naming two new plaintiffs (Charoensak and Rosen). | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 923 | On November 2, 2006, the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 924 | The hearing on class certification is set for April 16, 2007. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 925 | Contois Music Technology LLC v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 926 | Plaintiff Contois Music Technology filed this action on June 13, 2005 in the United States District Court for Vermont, alleging infringement by the Company of U.S. Patent No. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 927 | 5,864,868, entitled “Computer Control System and User Interface for Media Playing Devices.” The complaint sought unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 928 | The Company filed an answer on November 23, 2005 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 929 | A Markman hearing was held on June 13, 2006 and the court issued a claim construction ruling on July 24, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 930 | The parties agreed to a settlement and the case was dismissed on August 18, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 931 | This matter is now concluded. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 932 | Settlement of this matter did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 933 | Creative Technology Ltd. and Creative Labs, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed on May 15, 2006, International Trade Comission), Creative Technology Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed on May 15, 2006, United States District Court for the Northern District of California), Apple Computer, Inc. v. Creative Technology Ltd... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 934 | On May 15, 2006, Creative also brought suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, also alleging that the iPod infringed the ‘433 patent. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 935 | The District Court action was stayed pending resolution of the Creative ITC Action. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 936 | On May 15, 2006, the Company brought suit against Creative in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (“Wisconsin Action”), alleging that Creative infringed U.S. patent number 5,479,602 (“‘602 patent”), U.S. patent number 5,586,237 (“‘237 patent”), U.S. patent number 5,898,434 (“‘434 pate... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 937 | On May 17, 2006, the Company filed an amended complaint in the Wisconsin Action alleging that Creative also infringed U.S. patent number 5,341,293 (“‘293 patent”), U.S. patent number 6,047,342 (“‘342 patent”), and U.S. patent number 5,799,280 (“‘280 patent”). | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 938 | On June 1, 2006, the Company brought suit against Creative in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, (“Texas Action”), alleging that Creative infringed U.S. patent number 6,157,363 (“‘363 patent”), U.S. patent number 5,640,566 (“‘566 patent”), and U.S. patent number 5,504,852 (“‘852 patent”... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 939 | On June 27, 2006, the Company filed an amended complaint in the Texas Action alleging that Creative also infringed U.S. patent number 7,046,230 (“‘230 patent”) and U.S. patent number 6,282,646 (“‘646 patent”). | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 940 | At the suggestion of the District Court, the Company filed separate actions in the Eastern District of Texas regarding the Company’s allegations relating to the ‘230 patent and the ‘646 patent. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 941 | On June 1, 2006, the Company filed a complaint with the ITC alleging that Creative infringed the ‘230 patent, the ‘293 patent, and the ‘434 patent. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 942 | On June 5, 2006, the Company filed an amended complaint with the ITC alleging that Creative also infringed the ‘646 patent. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 943 | The parties reached a settlement of all of the above matters and all cases were dismissed as of October 13, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 944 | These matters are concluded. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 945 | Settlement of these matters did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 946 | Davis v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 947 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action in San Francisco County Superior Court on December 5, 2002, alleging that the Company engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices relating to its AppleCare Extended Service and Warranty Plan. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 948 | Plaintiff asserts causes of action for violation of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising), breach of the Song-Beverly Warranty Act, intentional misrepresentation and concealment. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 949 | Plaintiff requests unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.