cik stringclasses 1
value | date stringlengths 8 8 | form stringclasses 4
values | sentenceCount int64 0 2.33k | sentence stringlengths 2 5.25k | filename stringlengths 40 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 950 | The Company filed a demurrer and motion to strike, which were granted, in part, and Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 951 | The Company filed an answer on April 17, 2003 denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 952 | Plaintiff subsequently amended his complaint. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 953 | On October 29, 2003, the Company filed a motion to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel in his role as counsel to the purported class and to the general public. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 954 | The Court granted the motion but allowed Plaintiff to retain substitute counsel. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 955 | Plaintiff did engage new counsel for the general public, but not for the class. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 956 | The Company moved to disqualify Plaintiff’s new counsel and to have the Court dismiss the general public claims for equitable relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 957 | The Court declined to disqualify Plaintiff’s new counsel or to dismiss the equitable claims, but did confirm that the class action claims were dismissed. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 958 | The Company appealed the ruling and the case was stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 959 | The Court of Appeals denied the appeal on August 17, 2005, affirming the trial court’s decision. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 960 | The Company filed a Petition for review with the California Supreme Court, which was denied on November 23, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 961 | The case was remanded back to the trial court. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 962 | The parties have reached a settlement and the matter is concluded. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 963 | Settlement of this matter did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 964 | European Commission Investigation
The European Commission has notified the Company it is investigating certain matters relating to the iTunes Store in the European Union (“EU”). | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 965 | The European Commission is investigating claims made by Which?, a United Kingdom (UK) consumer association, that the Company is violating EU competition law by charging more for online music in the UK than in Eurozone countries and preventing UK consumers from purchasing online music from the iTunes Store for Eurozone ... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 966 | The Which? | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 967 | claims were originally lodged with the UK Office of Fair Trading, which subsequently referred them to the European Commission. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 968 | The European Commission is investigating the charges under Articles 81 and 82 of the European Commission Treaty. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 969 | Euro Tec Enterprises, Inc. et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 970 | v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 971 | This is a purported class action copyright infringement case filed on May 16, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by certain independent music publishers against the Company and several other defendants for allegedly failing to secure a compulsory license for copyrighted musi... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 972 | Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks an injunction, damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 973 | The Company filed an answer on July 28, 2006 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 974 | The case is in discovery and is set for trial on November 13, 2007 if no class is certified or on June 10, 2008 if a class is certified. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 975 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on October 23, 2006 and the Company filed an amended answer on November 28, 2006 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 976 | Gillis et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 977 | v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 978 | Plaintiffs filed this purported class action on December 23, 2005 in San Diego County Superior Court alleging the Company has misrepresented the hard drive capacity of two Powerbook G4 computers: the 12-inch, 1.5GHz computer with 512MB of memory and a 100GB hard drive; and the 15-inch, 1.67GHz computer with 1GB of memo... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 979 | Plaintiffs alleged that the Company’s standard disclosure on its packaging regarding hard drive size was not present on the packaging for these two models. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 980 | The complaint alleged violations of the California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and causes of action for deceit and negligent misrepresentation. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 981 | Plaintiffs sought restitution and other relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 982 | On February 28, 2006, the Company filed a demurrer
and a motion to strike. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 983 | The Company withdrew the demurrer and motion to strike per stipulation. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 984 | The Company has reached a Court-approved settlement with the Plaintiffs in this action and the matter is concluded. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 985 | The settlement of this matter did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 986 | Goldberg, et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 987 | v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 988 | Plaintiffs filed this purported class action on September 22, 2003 in Los Angeles County Superior Court against the Company and other members of the computer industry on behalf of an alleged nationwide class of purchasers of certain computer hard drives. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 989 | The case alleged violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act and false advertising related to the size of the drives. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 990 | Plaintiffs alleged that calculation of hard drive size using the decimal method misrepresents the actual size of the drive. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 991 | The complaint sought restitution and other relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 992 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March 30, 2004 and the Company filed an answer on September 23, 2004, denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 993 | Defendants filed a motion to strike portions of the complaint based on sales by resellers and filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings based upon Proposition 64. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 994 | The Court granted both motions at a hearing on April 6, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 995 | Plaintiffs thereafter filed an amended complaint on May 6, 2005. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 996 | The Defendants filed a demurrer on June 6, 2005, which the Court granted in part and denied in part. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 997 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint and the Company filed an answer on December 15, 2005 denying all allegations and asserting numerous assertive defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 998 | The Company reached a Court-approved settlement with the Plaintiffs in this action and the matter is concluded. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 999 | The settlement of this matter did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,000 | Gordon v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,001 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action on August 31, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of consumers who purchased 65W Power Adapters for iBooks and Powerbooks between November 2002 and the present. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,002 | The complaint alleges various problems with the 65W Adapter, including fraying, sparking and premature failure. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,003 | Plaintiffs allege violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and breach of warranties. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,004 | The complaint seeks damages and equitable relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,005 | The Company filed an answer on October 20, 2006 denying the material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,006 | Mediation is set for March 13, 2007. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,007 | Greaves v. Apple Computer, Inc.
On June 30, 2006 Plaintiff filed this purported class action in San Diego Superior Court on behalf of a purported class of California purchasers alleging discoloration of the MacBook case. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,008 | Plaintiff asserts claims under California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising), California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act and misrepresentation. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,009 | Plaintiff’s complaint seeks damages and equitable relief. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,010 | Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on August 16, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,011 | The Company filed an answer on October 3, 2006 denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,012 | Honeywell International, Inc., et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,013 | v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,014 | Plaintiffs Honeywell International, Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. filed this action on October 6, 2004 in the United States District Court in Delaware alleging infringement by the Company and other defendants of U.S. Patent 5,280,371 entitled “Directional Diffuser for a Liquid Crystal Display.” Plain... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,015 | The Company filed an answer on December 21, 2004 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,016 | The Company has tendered the case to several LCD manufacturer suppliers. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,017 | On May 18, 2005 the Court stayed the case against the Company and the other non-manufacturer defendants. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,018 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on November 7, 2005 adding additional defendants and expanding the scope of the accused products. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,019 | Given the stay, the Company’s response to the amended complaint is not yet due. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,020 | In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,021 | Derivative Litigation (formerly Karant v. Jobs, et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,022 | and Related Actions) (Federal Action)
On June 30, 2006, a putative derivative action captioned Karant v. Jobs, et. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,023 | al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,024 | A number of related actions were filed in the subsequent weeks and have been consolidated into a single action captioned In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,025 | Derivative Litigation, Master File No. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,026 | C-06-04128-JF before the Hon. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,027 | Jeremy Fogel. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,028 | A Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint was filed on December 18, 2006. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,029 | The action purports to assert claims on behalf of the Company against several current and former executive officers and members of the Board of Directors alleging improper backdating of stock option grants to maximize certain defendants’ profits, failing to properly account for
and take tax deductions for those grants,... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,030 | The Company is named as a nominal defendant. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,031 | The consolidated complaint alleges various causes of action under federal and California law, including claims for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of the California Corporations Code, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, rescission, constructive fraud and waste of corporate assets, as well as c... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,032 | Plaintiffs seek damages, disgorgement, restitution and imposition of a constructive trust. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,033 | The actions were filed after the Company’s announcement on June 29, 2006 that an internal investigation had discovered irregularities related to the issuance of certain stock option grants made between 1997 and 2001, that a special committee of the Company’s outside directors had retained independent counsel to perform... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,034 | The Company’s response to the Consolidated Complaint is not yet due. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,035 | In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,036 | Derivative Litigation (formerly Plumbers and Pipefitters v. Jobs, et al. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,037 | and Related Actions) (State Action); Boston Retirement Board v. Apple Computer, Inc.
On July 5, 2006, a putative derivative action captioned Plumbers and Pipefitters v. Jobs, et. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,038 | al., was filed in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,039 | A number of related actions were filed in the subsequent weeks, and have been consolidated into a single action captioned In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,040 | Derivative Litigation, No. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,041 | 1:06CV066692, assigned to the Hon. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,042 | Joseph Huber. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,043 | These actions purport to assert claims on behalf of the Company against several current and former executive officers and members of the Board of Directors alleging improper backdating of stock option grants to maximize certain defendants’ profits, failing to properly account for and take tax deductions for those grant... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,044 | The Company is named as a nominal defendant. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,045 | A consolidated complaint was filed on October 5, 2006, alleging a variety of causes of action under California law, including claims for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of the California Corporations Code, abuse of control, accounting, constructive trust, rescission, deceit, gross mismanagement, ... | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,046 | On December 7, 2006, the Court granted the Company’s motion to stay these actions. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,047 | On November 3, 2006, the Boston Retirement Board, a purported shareholder, filed a petition for writ of mandate against the Company in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara County (Boston Retirement Board v. Apple Computer Inc.). | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,048 | The petition seeks to compel the Company to allow inspection of certain corporate records relating to the Company’s option practices and the Special Committee’s investigation. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20061229 | 10-Q | 1,049 | The Company’s response to the petition is not yet due. | 0001104659-06-084286/full-submission.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.