cik stringclasses 1
value | date stringlengths 8 8 | form stringclasses 4
values | sentenceCount int64 0 2.33k | sentence stringlengths 2 5.25k | filename stringlengths 40 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 565 | Plaintiff’s complaint alleged violations of §§1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 566 | §§1 and 2), California Business & Professions Code §16700 et seq. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 567 | (the Cartwright Act), California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), common law unjust enrichment and common law monopolization. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 568 | Plaintiff sought unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 569 | The Company filed a motion to dismiss on February 10, 2005. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 570 | On September 9, 2005, the Court denied the motion in part and granted it in part. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 571 | Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 23, 2005 and the Company filed an answer on October 18, 2005. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 572 | On May 8, 2006, the Court heard plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to substitute two new plaintiffs for Slattery. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 573 | In August 2006, the court dismissed Slattery without prejudice and allowed plaintiffs to file an amended complaint naming two new plaintiffs (Charoensak and Rosen). | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 574 | On November 2, 2006, the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 575 | The hearing on class certification is set for April 16, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 576 | The Court scheduled a hearing on March 5, 2007 to determine whether to consolidate this case with Tucker v. Apple Computer, Inc.
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 577 | Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc. and Cisco-Linksys LLC filed this action on January 10, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that the Company is infringing Cisco’s “iPhone” trademark. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 578 | The complaint includes causes of action for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, unfair competition and other related claims. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 579 | Plaintiffs seek an injunction, damages, and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 580 | The Company’s response is not yet due. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 581 | Cisco Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 582 | Plaintiff Cisco Technology, Inc. filed a claim in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, in London on January 12, 2007 alleging that the Company is infringing Cisco’s “iPhone” trademark. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 583 | Cisco seeks an injunction, unspecified damages, and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 584 | The Company’s response to the complaint is due on February 21, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 585 | European Commission Investigation
The European Commission has notified the Company it is investigating certain matters relating to the iTunes Store in the European Union (“EU”). | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 586 | The European Commission is investigating claims made by Which?, a United Kingdom (“U.K.”) consumer association, that the Company is violating EU competition law by charging more for online music in the U.K. than in Eurozone countries and preventing U.K. consumers from purchasing online music
from the iTunes Store for E... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 587 | The Which? | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 588 | claims were originally lodged with the U.K. Office of Fair Trading, which subsequently referred them to the European Commission. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 589 | The European Commission is investigating the charges under Articles 81 and 82 of the European Commission Treaty. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 590 | Euro Tec Enterprises, Inc. et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 591 | v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 592 | This is a purported class action copyright infringement case filed on May 16, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by certain independent music publishers against the Company and several other defendants for allegedly failing to secure a compulsory license for copyrighted musi... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 593 | Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks an injunction, damages and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 594 | The Company filed an answer on July 28, 2006 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 595 | The case is in discovery and is set for trial on November 13, 2007 if no class is certified or on June 10, 2008 if a class is certified. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 596 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on October 23, 2006 and the Company filed an amended answer on November 28, 2006 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 597 | Gordon v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 598 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action on August 31, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of consumers who purchased 65W Power Adapters for iBooks and Powerbooks between November 2002 and the present. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 599 | The complaint alleges various problems with the 65W Adapter, including fraying, sparking, and premature failure. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 600 | Plaintiffs allege violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and breach of warranties. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 601 | The complaint seeks damages and equitable relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 602 | The Company filed an answer on October 20, 2006 denying the material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 603 | Mediation is set for March 13, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 604 | Greaves v. Apple Computer, Inc.
On June 30, 2006 plaintiff filed this purported class action in San Diego Superior Court on behalf of a purported class of California purchasers alleging discoloration of the MacBook case. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 605 | Plaintiff asserts claims under California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising), California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act and misrepresentation. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 606 | Plaintiff’s complaint seeks damages and equitable relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 607 | Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on August 16, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 608 | The Company filed an answer on October 3, 2006 denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 609 | Honeywell International, Inc., et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 610 | v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 611 | Plaintiffs Honeywell International, Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. filed this action on October 6, 2004 in the United States District Court in Delaware alleging infringement by the Company and other defendants of U.S. Patent 5,280,371 entitled “Directional Diffuser for a Liquid Crystal Display.” Plain... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 612 | The Company filed an answer on December 21, 2004 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 613 | The Company has tendered the case to several LCD manufacturer suppliers. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 614 | On May 18, 2005 the Court stayed the case against the Company and the other non-manufacturer defendants. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 615 | Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on November 7, 2005 adding additional defendants and expanding the scope of the accused products. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 616 | Given the stay, the Company’s response to the amended complaint is not yet due. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 617 | In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 618 | Derivative Litigation (formerly Karant v. Jobs, et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 619 | and Related Actions) (Federal Action)
On June 30, 2006, a putative derivative action captioned Karant v. Jobs, et. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 620 | al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 621 | A number of related actions were filed in the subsequent weeks and have been consolidated into a single action captioned In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 622 | Derivative Litigation, Master File No. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 623 | C-06-04128-JF before the Hon. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 624 | Jeremy Fogel. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 625 | A Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint was filed on December 18, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 626 | The action purports to assert claims on behalf of the Company against several current and former executive officers and members of the Board of Directors alleging improper backdating of stock option grants to maximize certain defendants’ profits, failing to properly account for and take tax deductions for those grants,... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 627 | The Company is named as a nominal defendant. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 628 | The consolidated complaint alleges various causes of action under federal and California law, including claims for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of the California Corporations Code, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, rescission, constructive fraud and waste of corporate assets, as well as c... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 629 | Plaintiffs seek
damages, disgorgement, restitution and imposition of a constructive trust. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 630 | The actions were filed after the Company’s announcement on June 29, 2006 that an internal investigation had discovered irregularities related to the issuance of certain stock option grants made between 1997 and 2001, that a special committee of the Company’s outside directors had retained independent counsel to perform... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 631 | The Company’s response to the Consolidated Complaint is not yet due and plaintiffs have indicated that they will seek to file an amended complaint. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 632 | In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 633 | Derivative Litigation (formerly Plumbers and Pipefitters v. Jobs, et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 634 | and Related Actions) (State Action); Boston Retirement Board v. Apple Computer, Inc.
On July 5, 2006, a putative derivative action captioned Plumbers and Pipefitters v. Jobs, et. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 635 | al., was filed in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 636 | A number of related actions were filed in the subsequent weeks, and have been consolidated into a single action captioned In re Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 637 | Derivative Litigation, No. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 638 | 1:06CV066692, assigned to the Hon. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 639 | Joseph Huber. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 640 | These actions purport to assert claims on behalf of the Company against several current and former executive officers and members of the Board of Directors alleging improper backdating of stock option grants to maximize certain defendants’ profits, failing to properly account for and take tax deductions for those grant... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 641 | The Company is named as a nominal defendant. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 642 | A consolidated complaint was filed on October 5, 2006, alleging a variety of causes of action under California law, including claims for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of the California Corporations Code, abuse of control, accounting, constructive trust, rescission, deceit, gross mismanagement a... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 643 | On December 7, 2006, the Court granted the Company’s motion to stay these actions. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 644 | On November 3, 2006, the Boston Retirement Board, a purported shareholder, filed a petition for writ of mandate against the Company in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara County (Boston Retirement Board v. Apple Computer Inc.). | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 645 | The petition seeks to compel the Company to allow inspection of certain corporate records relating to the Company’s option practices and the Special Committee’s investigation. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 646 | On January 16, 2007, the Company filed a demurrer to the petition. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 647 | Intertainer, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 648 | Plaintiff Intertainer, Inc. filed this action on December 29, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement by the Company of U.S. Patent number 6,925,469 entitled “Digital Entertainment Service Platform.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 649 | The Company’s response to the complaint is not yet due. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 650 | Lenzi v. Apple Canada, Inc.; Wolfe v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc.; Hirst v. Apple Canada, Inc.; Hamilton v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 651 | Plaintiff filed a purported class action on June 7, 2005, in Superior Court, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada allegedly on behalf of Quebec customers claiming false advertising and breach of warranty relating to iPod battery life. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 652 | Plaintiff sought authorization to institute a class action on behalf of Generations 1, 2 and 3 iPod owners in Quebec. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 653 | On February 2, 2006, the Court dismissed plaintiff’s motion for authorization to institute a class action. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 654 | Plaintiff has appealed this ruling, and the appeal will be heard on February 22, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 655 | Two similar complaints relative to iPod battery life, Wolfe v. Apple and Hirst v. Apple, were filed in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on August 15, 2005 and September 12, 2005, respectively. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 656 | Counsel subsequently amended the complaint, now called Waddell vs. Apple. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 657 | The Waddell lawsuit is brought on behalf of all Canadian purchasers other than Quebec purchasers. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 658 | On January 17, 2006, the Company filed its statement of defence to the Waddell complaint. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 659 | In addition, a similar complaint regarding iPod battery life, Hamilton v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc. was filed in Calgary, Alberta, Canada on October 5, 2005, purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of iPods in Alberta, Canada. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 660 | The complaint was served on September 27, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 661 | Macadam v. Apple Computer, Inc; Santos v. Apple Computer, Inc. (Santa Clara County Superior Court)
Plaintiff filed this action in late 2002 asserting various causes of action including breach of contract, fraud, negligent and intentional interference with economic relationship, negligent misrepresentation, trade libel,... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 662 | Plaintiff requests unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 663 | The Company filed an answer on December 3, 2004 denying all allegations and asserting numerous defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 664 | On October 1, 2003, Macadam was deauthorized as an Apple reseller. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.