cik stringclasses 1
value | date stringlengths 8 8 | form stringclasses 4
values | sentenceCount int64 0 2.33k | sentence stringlengths 2 5.25k | filename stringlengths 40 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 665 | Macadam filed a motion for a temporary order to reinstate it as a reseller, which the Court denied. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 666 | The Court denied Macadam’s motion for a preliminary
injunction on December 19, 2003. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 667 | On December 6, 2004, Macadam filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Northern District of California, which placed a stay on the litigation as to Macadam. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 668 | The Company filed a claim in the bankruptcy proceedings on February 16, 2005. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 669 | The Macadam bankruptcy case was converted to Chapter 7 (liquidation) on April 29, 2005. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 670 | The Company has reached a settlement of Macadam’s claims against the Company with the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 671 | The Bankruptcy Court approved the settlement on July 17, 2006 over the objection of Tom Santos, MacAdam’s principal. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 672 | Santos has appealed the ruling approving the settlement. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 673 | On December 19, 2005, Tom Santos, who was an original plaintiff in the Macadam case, filed a Fifth Amended Complaint on his own behalf (not on behalf of Macadam) alleging fraud, violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false adverti... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 674 | The Company filed a demurrer to Santos’ amended complaint and a special motion to strike the defamation cause of action on January 20, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 675 | The Court sustained the demurrer in part but denied the special motion to strike. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 676 | Santos filed a Sixth Amended Complaint on July 14, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 677 | The Company filed a demurrer, which was granted on September 9, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 678 | Santos filed a Seventh Amended Complaint in late September 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 679 | The Company filed a motion to strike, which was granted in part and denied in part on December 15, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 680 | The Company awaits an amended complaint. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 681 | The Company also filed a cross complaint against Santos on January 20, 2006 alleging violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 and California Penal Code §502, fraud and deceit and breach of contract. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 682 | Macsolutions, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 683 | Plaintiff Macsolutions, Inc., a former Apple authorized reseller, filed this lawsuit against the Company on January 20, 2006 alleging breach of contract, fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with economic advantage, violation of the Cartwright Act, violation of California Business & Profes... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 684 | The factual allegations in this complaint are similar to those in the Macadam case and the Branning class action. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 685 | Principally, plaintiffs allege that the Company treated Macsolutions unfairly compared to other resellers, competed unfairly in opening the Apple retail stores and sold used goods as new. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 686 | Macsolutions filed an amended complaint on June 5, 2006, adding Tech Data Corporation as a defendant. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 687 | The Company filed an answer on July 5, 2006 generally denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 688 | The case is in discovery. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 689 | The case is set for trial on June 18, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 690 | PhatRat Technology LLC v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 691 | Plaintiff PhatRat Technology LLC filed this action on October 24, 2006 in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado alleging infringement of U.S. Patent number 6,499,000 entitled “System and Method for Determining Loft Time, Speed, Height and Distance,” U.S. Patent number 6,885,971 entitled “Methods... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 692 | The Company filed an answer on January 22, 2007 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 693 | The Company also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 694 | Premier International Associates LLC v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 695 | Plaintiff Premier International Associates LLC filed this action on November 3, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement by the Company of U.S. Patent Nos. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 696 | 6,243,725 and 6,763,345 both entitled “List Building System.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 697 | The Company filed an answer on January 13, 2006 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 698 | The Company also asserted counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 699 | A Markman hearing is set for May 17, 2007 and trial is scheduled for December 3, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 700 | Quantum Technology Management, Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 701 | Plaintiff filed this action on December 21, 2005 in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against the Company and Fingerworks, Ltd., alleging infringement of U.S. Patent number 5,730,165 entitled “Time Domain Capacitive Field Detector.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 702 | On May 11, 2006, Quantum filed an amended complaint adding Cypress Semiconductor/MicroSystems, Inc. as a defendant. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 703 | On July 31, 2006, the Company filed an answer denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses and
also filed counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 704 | On November 30, 2006 plaintiff filed a reply to the Company’s counterclaims and a More Definite Statement. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 705 | A Markman hearing is set for May 16, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 706 | Saito Shigeru Kenchiku Kenkyusho (Shigeru Saito Architecture Institute) v. iPod
Plaintiff Saito filed a petition in the Japan Customs Office in Tokyo on January 23, 2007 alleging infringement by the Company of Japanese Patent No. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 707 | 3852854, entitled “Touch Operation Input Device and Electronic Parts Thereof.” The petition seeks an order barring the importation into Japan of fifth generation iPods and second generation iPod nanos. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 708 | The Company’s responsive pleading is due February 6, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 709 | St-Germain v. Apple Canada, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 710 | Plaintiff filed this case in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, on August 5, 2005, seeking authorization to institute a class action for the refund by the Company of the Canadian Private Copying Levy that was applied to the iPod purchase price in Quebec between December 12, 2003 and December 14, 2004 but later declared invalid ... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 711 | The Company has completed a refund program for this levy. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 712 | A class certification hearing took place January 13, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 713 | On February 24, 2006, the Court granted class certification and notice was published during the last week of March 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 714 | Discovery is closed and the case is prepared for trial which the Company anticipates will take place in 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 715 | Tse v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 716 | Plaintiff Ho Keung Tse filed this action against the Company and other defendants on August 5, 2005 in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland alleging infringement of U.S. Patent number 6,665,797 entitled “Protection of Software Again [sic] Against Unauthorized Use.” The complaint seeks unspecifi... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 717 | The Company filed an answer on October 31, 2005 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 718 | On October 28, 2005, the Company and the other defendants filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California, which was granted on August 31, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 719 | A Markman hearing has been scheduled for September 6, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 720 | Tucker v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 721 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action on July 21, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging various claims including alleged unlawful tying of music and videos purchased on the iTunes Store with the purchase of iPods and vice versa and unlawful acquisition or mainte... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 722 | The complaint alleges violations of §§1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 723 | §§1 and 2), California Business & Professions Code §16700 et seq. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 724 | (the Cartwright Act), California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 725 | Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 726 | On November 3, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 727 | On December 20, 2006, the Court denied the motion to dismiss. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 728 | On January 11, 2007, Apple filed an answer denying all material allegations and asserting numerous defenses. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 729 | The Court scheduled a hearing on March 5, 2007 to determine whether to consolidate this case with Charoensak v. Apple Computer, Inc.
Union Fédérale des Consummateurs - - Que Choisir v. Apple Computer France S.à.r.l. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 730 | and iTunes S.à.r.l. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 731 | Plaintiff, a consumer association in France, filed this complaint on February 9, 2005 alleging that the above-listed entities are violating consumer law by (1) omitting to mention that the iPod is allegedly not compatible with music from online music services other than the iTunes Store and that the music from the iTun... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 732 | Plaintiff seeks damages, injunctive relief and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 733 | The first hearing on the case took place on May 24, 2005. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 734 | The Company’s response to the complaint was served on November 8, 2005. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 735 | Plaintiff’s responsive pleading was filed on February 10, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 736 | The Company filed a reply on June 6, 2006 and UFC filed a response on September 19, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 737 | Vitt v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 738 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action on November 7, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of the iBook G4 alleging that the computer’s logic board fails at an abnormally high rate. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 739 | The complaint alleges violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 740 | Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 741 | The Company filed a motion to dismiss on January 19, 2007. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 742 | Vogel v. Jobs et al. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 743 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action on August 24, 2006, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of the Company’s current and former officers and directors alleging improper backdating of stock option grants to maximize certain defendants’ profi... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 744 | The lawsuit purports to be brought on behalf of all purchasers of the Company’s stock from December 1, 2005 through August 11, 2006, and asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act as well as control person claims. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 745 | On January 19, 2007, the
Court appointed the New York City Employees’ Retirement System as lead plaintiff. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 746 | Defendants’ responses to the complaint are not yet due. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 747 | Wimmer v. Apple Computer, Inc. (originally filed as Tomczak v. Apple Computer, Inc. on October 19, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division; amended complaint filed October 26, 2005); Moschella, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed October 26, 2005 United Sta... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 748 | v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed October 26, 2005, Los Angeles County Superior Court); Kahan, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed October 31, 2005, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York); Jennings, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed November 4, 2005, United States District Court for th... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 749 | The federal actions were coordinated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and assigned to the Hon. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 750 | Ronald Whyte pursuant to an April 17, 2006 order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 751 | Plaintiffs filed a First Consolidated and Amended Master Complaint on September 21, 2006, alleging violations of California and other states’ consumer protection and warranty laws and claiming unjust enrichment. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 752 | The Master Complaint alleges two putative plaintiff classes: (1) all U.S. residents (excluding California residents) who purchased an iPod nano that was not manufactured or designed using processes necessary to ensure normal resistance to scratching of the screen; and (2) all iPod nano purchasers other than U.S. reside... | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 753 | Pursuant to stipulation, the Wimmer, Valencia, and Rappel federal complaints were dismissed without prejudice and the Mayo and Williamson complaints were administratively closed without prejudice. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 754 | The Company answered the Master Complaint on November 20, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 755 | The two California state actions were coordinated on May 4, 2006, and assigned to the Hon. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 756 | Carl West in Los Angeles Superior Court. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 757 | Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint on June 8, 2006, alleging violations of California state consumer protection, unfair competition, false advertising and warranty laws and claiming unjust enrichment. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 758 | The Consolidated Complaint alleges a putative plaintiff class of all California residents who own an iPod nano containing a manufacturing defect that results in the nano being susceptible to excessive scratching. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 759 | The Company answered the Consolidated Amended Complaint on October 6, 2006. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 760 | Two similar complaints, Carpentier v. Apple Canada, Inc., and Royer-Brennan v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc. were filed in Montreal, Quebec, Canada on October 27, 2005 and November 9, 2005, respectively, seeking authorization to institute class actions on behalf of iPod nano purchasers in Quebec. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 761 | The Royer-Brennan file was stayed in May 2006 in favor of the Carpentier file. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 762 | A similar complaint, Mund v. Apple Canada Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc., was filed in Ontario, Canada on January 9, 2006 seeking authorization to institute a class action on behalf of iPod nano purchasers in Canada. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 763 | Apple Canada Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc. have served Notices of Intent to Defend. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20070202 | 10-Q | 764 | Item 1A. | 0001104659-07-006648/full-submission.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.