text stringlengths 19 206 |
|---|
pB0yR5kXQjI-058|But that gives me many more 90 degree lone pair-bond pair interactions. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-059|And those are very sterically bad. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-060|The 90-degree lone pair-bond pair arrangements we want to minimize in our structures. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-061|So this is a better arrangement of five things-- two lone pairs, three atoms. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-062|We can go to steric number 6. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-063|Steric number 6 will have an octahedron configuration. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-064|Now remember, it's octahedral because this shape is an octahedron, which has eight sides but six vertices. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-065|So six vertices, each position identical, 90-degree bond angles between all of them. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-066|Some examples-- SF6. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-067|Sulfur hexafluoride, that's steric number 6 around the fluorine. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-068|Each fluorine identical, steric number 6 around the sulfur, each fluorine identical. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-069|Or xenon tetrafluoride. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-070|Again, steric number 6, but this case, two of the items are lone pairs. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-071|And in this case, they are arranged axially, and they give an overall shape to xenon tetrafluoride of square planar. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-074|So we have bonded atoms that determine the overall shape. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-075|When we have bonded atoms and lone pairs, we ignore the lone pairs and name the shape based on bonded atoms alone. |
pB0yR5kXQjI-076|That's how we do shapes of molecules and molecular geometry. |
81v3NxDRdLk-000|Let's look at a few stepwise equilibria and look at manipulations with the equilibrium constants. |
81v3NxDRdLk-001|So here I have nickel hydrate, a complex ion, reacting with ammonia to form a nickel ammonia complex ion. |
81v3NxDRdLk-006|If I take my green solution of the hydrate and add ethylene diamine I'll get a purple ethylene diamine complex. |
81v3NxDRdLk-008|Well, let's look at these equilibrium constants more carefully and see if we can make a determination. |
81v3NxDRdLk-011|And here the nickel ammonia complex with the ethylene diamine as a reactant, displacing that. |
81v3NxDRdLk-012|This is the K we want to determine. |
81v3NxDRdLk-015|And when you add reactions, you multiply equilibrium constants. |
81v3NxDRdLk-016|And we can prove that. |
81v3NxDRdLk-017|Let's do this even a little more explicitly. |
81v3NxDRdLk-018|We'll show K2 is K3 over K1. |
81v3NxDRdLk-019|Or K3 is K1 times K2. |
81v3NxDRdLk-020|We'll write out. |
81v3NxDRdLk-036|So now we're in a position to say, well, what is the reaction, K2? |
81v3NxDRdLk-037|How big is K2? |
81v3NxDRdLk-038|We know it's K3 over K1. |
81v3NxDRdLk-039|We can just do the math here. |
81v3NxDRdLk-040|So if K3 is larger than K1, then K2 will be bigger than 1. |
81v3NxDRdLk-041|And I'll go towards the ethylene diamine. |
81v3NxDRdLk-042|If K3 is less than K1, then this K will be less than 1. |
81v3NxDRdLk-045|So in order to figure this out, we're just going to have to do the experiment. |
81v3NxDRdLk-046|So let's go ahead and do that. |
81v3NxDRdLk-047|I have these down here. |
81v3NxDRdLk-048|And I have the nickel hydrate, two vials. |
81v3NxDRdLk-049|And I have some ammonia here. |
81v3NxDRdLk-052|And indeed, I produced my blue nickel ammonia complex. |
81v3NxDRdLk-053|Now here's the nickel hydrate. |
81v3NxDRdLk-058|Which of these Ks is larger, K3 or K1? |
81v3NxDRdLk-060|So here's ammonia. |
81v3NxDRdLk-064|It looks like this K is going to be bigger than 1. |
81v3NxDRdLk-065|It favors the ethylene diamine Let's prove that. |
81v3NxDRdLk-066|Here is their exact reaction. |
81v3NxDRdLk-070|It will be this violet color if K3 is bigger. |
81v3NxDRdLk-071|It would be a blue color if K3 was smaller. |
81v3NxDRdLk-072|But what we've shown is K3 is bigger. |
81v3NxDRdLk-073|The ethylene diamine is the stronger binding ligand. |
81v3NxDRdLk-074|And what we have is an analysis of equilibrium constants in multiple equilibria. |
6BZb96mqmbg-000|Let's look at some second order chemical kinetics. |
6BZb96mqmbg-004|Or the rate is the product of two concentrations. |
6BZb96mqmbg-005|So the sum of the powers 1 plus 1 gives you second order kinetics. |
6BZb96mqmbg-007|So a plot of 1 over concentration versus time is linear. |
6BZb96mqmbg-008|And that's how you determine if you have a second order chemical reaction. |
6BZb96mqmbg-012|Now, we can look at the half life for second order reactions as well. |
6BZb96mqmbg-014|So the initial amount-- the initial concentration matters in terms of the half life. |
6BZb96mqmbg-015|The amount of time it takes to go from initial concentration to molar down to initial concentration one molar depends on the fact that it's two molar. |
6BZb96mqmbg-016|That is it's going to take longer for four molar to go to two molar than one molar down to half molar. |
6BZb96mqmbg-017|And that tells you something about the kinetics. |
6BZb96mqmbg-018|A second order reaction means there's some collision somewhere in there. |
6BZb96mqmbg-020|Those have to come together. |
6BZb96mqmbg-021|If the concentration of iodine increases, the rate increases, because the number of collisions increase. |
6BZb96mqmbg-022|More iodine there, more collisions. |
6BZb96mqmbg-023|So the frequency of collisions is reflected in this half life. |
6BZb96mqmbg-024|If you have a high initial concentration, you'll have high initial concentrations and high initial collisions. |
6BZb96mqmbg-025|And that will give you a low half life. |
6BZb96mqmbg-026|But if you're a dilute solution, low initial concentration, then you'll have a longer half life. |
6BZb96mqmbg-027|Collisions aren't as frequent. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-000|Let's talk about the p orbitals in terms of a ChemQuiz. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-001|Remember, an orbital is a group of three quantum numbers that define a wave function. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-002|So we need a value of n, a value of l, and a value of m sub l. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-003|If the value of n is 2, the value of l is 1, and the value of m sub l is 0, that's a p orbital. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-004|So for p orbitals, I've written a plot of psi and psi squared versus phi, that angle from the positive x-axis. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-009|We're talking about the 2p orbitals and we're plotting the wave function psi versus the angle phi from the positive x-axis. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-010|Now, there's three possible 2p orbitals. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-014|I've chosen to plot the 2py orbital here. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-015|And I know it's the 2py, because the maximum occurs along the y-axis. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-016|So let's look at the wave function, which the square is kind of shown here. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-019|The angle phi gets bigger as you go away from the positive x-axis. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-020|So this angle phi equals 0 is the x-axis. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-022|So anywhere along the x-axis or the z-axis, the wave function has to be 0. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-023|And that's what we have in this case. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-024|The wave function is 0 for values of phi that are equal to 0. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-025|If I let phi get bigger, what I'll find is, well, I'll start to sweep into these positive values of the wave function. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-026|The wave function should go positive. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-029|That's as big as it's going to get along the positive y-axis. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-030|So that should be a maximum in the wave function and the square of the wave function. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-031|And I can continue around. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-032|I can let phi go to pi. |
fiJ6UDSt8hU-033|I'll come along to the negative x-axis, and of course, anywhere along the x-axis the function has to go to 0, and of course, the square of the wave function goes to 0. |
oqN1aemQnu0-000|The three common phases of matter are solid, liquid, and gas. |
oqN1aemQnu0-001|And we can plot where they occur on a pressure-temperature plot. |
oqN1aemQnu0-002|And when we do, we call that a phase diagram. |
oqN1aemQnu0-003|On a phase diagram, at low pressures, you'd expect the gas phase to exist. |
oqN1aemQnu0-008|This is a plot for carbon dioxide. |
oqN1aemQnu0-009|And here's the liquid-gas equilibrium line. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.