Search is not available for this dataset
If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
stringlengths
74
421
If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
stringlengths
36
192
Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
stringclasses
788 values
The arson occurred on Elm Street
stringclasses
788 values
modus ponen
stringclasses
2 values
Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
stringclasses
394 values
The arson occurred on Elm Street.1
stringclasses
394 values
Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
stringclasses
394 values
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
stringclasses
394 values
True
bool
1 class
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene, since if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene, because if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene, as if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
modus tollen
A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, since if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, because if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, as if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
modus tollen
The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, since if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, because if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, as if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
modus tollen
A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
modus tollen
The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
modus tollen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
modus tollen
A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson occurred on Elm Street
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true