Search is not available for this dataset
If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. stringlengths 74 421 | If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street stringlengths 36 192 | Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 788 values | The arson occurred on Elm Street stringclasses 788 values | modus ponen stringclasses 2 values | Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 394 values | The arson occurred on Elm Street.1 stringclasses 394 values | Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 394 values | The arson did not occur on Elm Street stringclasses 394 values | True bool 1 class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, since if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, because if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, as if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | modus tollen | A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson occurred on Elm Street | No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data, since if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data, because if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data, as if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | modus tollen | The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, since if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, because if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, as if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | modus tollen | The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, since if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, because if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, as if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | modus tollen | A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause, since if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause, because if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause, as if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | modus tollen | The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the arson occurred on elm street, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the arson occurred on elm street | The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.