Search is not available for this dataset
If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
stringlengths
74
421
If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
stringlengths
36
192
Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
stringclasses
788 values
The arson occurred on Elm Street
stringclasses
788 values
modus ponen
stringclasses
2 values
Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
stringclasses
394 values
The arson occurred on Elm Street.1
stringclasses
394 values
Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
stringclasses
394 values
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
stringclasses
394 values
True
bool
1 class
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization, since if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization, because if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization, as if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
modus tollen
The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
The arson occurred on Elm Street
The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, since if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, because if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, as if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
modus tollen
A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson occurred on Elm Street
A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, since if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, because if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, as if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
modus tollen
Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
Detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse, since if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
Detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse, because if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
Detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse, as if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.
If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
modus tollen
Detective Nguyen found a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, hence the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, thus the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, so the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, since if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, because if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
The arson occurred on elm street, as if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
modus ponen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.
If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
The arson did not occur on elm street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
modus tollen
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was in financial distress before her death
The arson occurred on Elm Street
Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
The arson did not occur on Elm Street
true