Search is not available for this dataset
If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. stringlengths 74 421 | If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street stringlengths 36 192 | Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 788 values | The arson occurred on Elm Street stringclasses 788 values | modus ponen stringclasses 2 values | Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 394 values | The arson occurred on Elm Street.1 stringclasses 394 values | Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 394 values | The arson did not occur on Elm Street stringclasses 394 values | True bool 1 class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The arson occurred on elm street, because if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, since if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, because if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, as if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | modus tollen | Officer Jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, since if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, because if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, as if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | modus tollen | Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street and detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | Detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, since if detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, because if detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Detective patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park, as if detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If detective patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | modus tollen | Detective Patel found a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Detective Patel did not find a bag of stolen jewels hidden in a public park | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo, since if a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo, because if a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A homeless shelter worker, maria, did not recognize emily from a photo, as if a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a homeless shelter worker, maria, recognized emily from a photo then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | modus tollen | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, recognized Emily from a photo | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless shelter worker, Maria, did not recognize Emily from a photo | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street and richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | Richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions, since if richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions, because if richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | modus tollen | Richard Anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.