daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
1	Born again? Pardon me for getting it right the first time. ;)
0	So you're actually claiming that it is a lie to say that the UK has a lower gun crime rate than the US? Even if the police were miscounting crimes it's still a huge and unjustified leap in logic to conclude from that that the UK does not have a lower gun crime rate.
0	But you know that this is not what I was saying: We have a basis for comparison.
1	nation excited for some insane k-pop shit during opening ceremony
0	ongoing chicanery with the gehry memorial
0	lifetime releases the first trailer for toni braxton's 'unbreak my heart'
1	bill up and dies in tennessee legislature
0	nestlé recalls millions of frozen products that may contain glass
0	ohio cop indicted on murder charge in traffic-stop shooting
0	That is an erroneous line of reasoning because it fails to take into account the myriad of other options open to a women after birth to remove the newborn from her care without any ill effects (physically anyway). Killing in the instance of a newborn is not justified because of those other options open to her. By contrast, a pregnant woman has exactly one option open to her to remove the fetus from her care and that is abortion. I would contend that the same line of reasoning that allows for adoption can be used here, that no one must donate their resources to a dependant.Your reasoning that a woman, using the same line of reasoning that pro-choice people employ, can withhold her bodily resources "until the newborn dies" as if that is equal to withholding bodily resources in pregnancy is faulty.
1	man stuck in no-man's land between two domino's delivery areas
0	new york giants clean house, fire coach ben mcadoo, gm jerry reese
1	winneshiek county stadium indeed ready to rock
0	Could you please cite where you are getting this biological definition of evolution?
0	naked truth: how i learned to stop worrying and (sort of) love my body
0	illustrators depict the everyday items giving hope to child refugees
1	swiss unable to maintain neutrality toward delicious pastries
0	suspects chased by cops spin doughnuts on hollywood street
1	waitress only friendly when bringing the check
0	end gun violence by repealing not enacting legislation
1	local newswoman's hairstyle reported on by co-anchor
1	You're right, I'm not interested in your incoherent ramblings, rather I'm annoyed at the bluster of cut and paste spam you've managed to produce. I have no problem with the list, my problem is with your use of "logic". Waxy
0	these are the top 15 u.s. cities for couples, according to rent.com
0	reality, risk & reward: is us kids tv ripe for authenticity and autonomy?
1	suicide bombing a cry for help, vengeance against the infidel
0	david beckham stared down a studio camera: here's what we know
0	poor people's campaign is the angry response to inequality america needs
0	demi lovato drops emotional 'nightingale' music vid
0	adnan syed is getting a second podcast after 'serial'
1	mom sits down for dinner 3 months after rest of family finishes meal
0	bionic fingertip restores amputee's sense of touch
0	how to recover from unicorn hair
0	appeals court won't reconsider bob mcdonnell's case
1	voters shocked christie botched such an easy political cover-up
0	You SERIOUSLY need to take a basic biology course so you can stop sticking your foot in your mouth emoticonXRolleyes An egg is NOT larva, and larva is NOT a caterpillar, and a caterpillar is NOT a butterfly - much the same as a zygote is NOT a embryo, and a embryo is NOT a fetus, and a fetus is NOT a baby, and a baby is NOT an adult. I challenge you to prove that a larva is exactly the same as a butterfly. If you can't even do something as simple as that, then you'll never understand the process/transformation of what a human has to go through, and THAT in and of itself should give you a clue as to how much in denial you are in, and how much you have to twist the truth around just to justify your version of events. Deal with it!
1	rod stewart mistaken for elderly aunt
1	spelling bee champion returns to school a hero, he imagines
0	obama begins sales pitch on trade to wary u.s. public
0	why the rule of law is key to china's modernization
1	historical archives: kid-ney bean shaped organ recently discovered
0	5 things you miss about married life as a divorced mom
1	'boating world magazine' giving live updates as its team of reporters reads all of mueller report
0	So now you're freely and willingly admitting that you'd take pleasure in inflicting pain and suffering on innocent people who have never done anything to you? Good God! No wonder you don't like guns and want to see everyone disarmed!
1	advertiser thought this sponsored post was good idea
0	half of u.s. democrats want joe biden in the 2016 race
1	ticketed motorist pointing finger just the green light cop needed
1	exhilarated woman discovers last person who used jigsaw puzzle left lots of pieces sticking together
1	stolen tour bus leads police on chase of historic downtown philadelphia
1	himalayan goat dies following failed everest climb
0	comedian releases song to find her own rachel maddow
0	poll shows support for birth control mandate on eve of court ruling
1	magical gallery transforms dull objects into art
1	12-year-old who got her hair curled for spring dance the very image of old hollywood glamour
1	man who willingly rented 'wrath of the titans' feels his intelligence has been insulted
0	8 ways to recommit to your fading resolutions
1	side effects sound awesome
1	millions of human beings experiencing actual emotions about j.j. abrams directing 'star wars'
0	Yes, everyone is a "potential" felon. Fortunately most people never commit a felony. And there are many different types of weapons, all which could be used by previously law abiding citizens to commit an act of violence.
1	This is often called: 'talking out of both sides of your mouth'
0	what the house gop isn't telling you about their obamacare repeal bill
1	Well, at least you are more consistent about equality than a lot of people in your movement.
0	how to buy grown-up art without going broke (or setting foot in a gallery)
0	trump reportedly offered vice admiral harward national security adviser job
0	trump praises chuck schumer in reposted tweet that first called him 'cunning'
0	will the charlie hebdo terrorist attack kill intelligence reform in the united states?
1	annoying man more annoying after skydiving
0	breweries donate 205,000 cans of water to harvey victims
0	young mom earns $50 million while caring for two children
0	the forest that fights climate change
0	intuition or ego? 3 simple steps to reach truth
1	'breitbart' refusing to release names of mass shooting victims in order to prevent them from getting attention
0	bill maher gets real about marijuana legalization
1	new employee has never known decadent pleasures of old office
0	ferguson protesters celebrate thanksgiving in a church, boycott black friday
1	So how many locusts, beetles etc. were there on the Ark? Do you think that there were a pair of each species, or just a pair of each "Biblical Type" and could you define what is meant by that term? Would that include all beetles/insects/arthropods/invertebrates or just anything you felt was convenient?
0	what my parents' divorce taught me about heartbreak
1	fred durst spray paints 'limp bizkit' on bridge
0	jon stewart reveals the one thing he'll never do
1	I guess you missed this bit: State Sen. Robert Hagan (D-Youngstown) admits his bill is purely "tongue-in-cheek" but says that the message is anything but a joke. Being a story from a gay news source, maybe you saw the word "tongue" and assumed there'd be a vivid description of some abominable sex act, so you stopped reading, closed your browser window, shut down your computer, dunked it in disinfectant, etc., etc. Or is this just proof you don't read what people post?
0	the science behind why celebrities like ryan lochte tell fibs
0	browns' josh gordon to enter rehab
0	Or that they tend to be better prepared, or even less willing to accept help from others or get breakdown cover. That's the trouble with these kind of stats, the interpretations are pretty open to debate.
0	in the event of a water landing
0	chinese state media threatens donald trump with 'big sticks' if he pushes for a trade war
0	watch john malkovich perform as a 'lady' in david lynch homage
0	'six million dollar man' star martin e. brooks dead at age 90
0	women in business: three generations of women in radio: renee roth, jo-ann silverstein and rachel roth
0	30 days of online dating: naughty by nature
1	hippocratic oath under review by hmo board
1	emotionally abusive social media site continuously manipulating woman into staying
0	lobbying spending hits historic lows
0	hillary clinton really wants you to think she's tough on wall street
0	And think of what other animals have built (and for an actual purpose). Take a look at a bee hive. It's so complex and so perfect for them. They built that. An ant hill is at least 20 times the size of an ant. That's 120 feet for us (for a 6 foot person).
0	trevor noah just sincerely praised donald trump for something
1	dad gets dolled up for trip to lowe's
1	I avert your gaze. I submit myself to your mercy. Henceforth I shall only respond to your web postings. I shall not respond to postings you make on the web....Wait.....
0	watch: meteorologist evacuates during live tornado report
0	nasa joins twitter users to name those newly discovered planets. the inevitable happens.
0	björk retrospective at moma, new york (video)
1	But at one time society accepted that slavery was right. So, Abraham Lincoln, how dare you try and impose your own personal moral code on me. We have the right to own slaves via the Constitution and various laws of the society, and because it's in the Constitution and protected by laws, it obviously means society agrees that slavery is not wrong. Therefore, slavery is not wrong.

1

Born again? Pardon me for getting it right the first time. ;)

0

So you're actually claiming that it is a lie to say that the UK has a lower gun crime rate than the US? Even if the police were miscounting crimes it's still a huge and unjustified leap in logic to conclude from that that the UK does not have a lower gun crime rate.

0

But you know that this is not what I was saying: We have a basis for comparison.

1

nation excited for some insane k-pop shit during opening ceremony

0

ongoing chicanery with the gehry memorial

0

lifetime releases the first trailer for toni braxton's 'unbreak my heart'

1

bill up and dies in tennessee legislature

0

nestlé recalls millions of frozen products that may contain glass

0

ohio cop indicted on murder charge in traffic-stop shooting

0

That is an erroneous line of reasoning because it fails to take into account the myriad of other options open to a women after birth to remove the newborn from her care without any ill effects (physically anyway). Killing in the instance of a newborn is not justified because of those other options open to her. By contrast, a pregnant woman has exactly one option open to her to remove the fetus from her care and that is abortion. I would contend that the same line of reasoning that allows for adoption can be used here, that no one must donate their resources to a dependant.Your reasoning that a woman, using the same line of reasoning that pro-choice people employ, can withhold her bodily resources "until the newborn dies" as if that is equal to withholding bodily resources in pregnancy is faulty.

1

man stuck in no-man's land between two domino's delivery areas

0

new york giants clean house, fire coach ben mcadoo, gm jerry reese

1

winneshiek county stadium indeed ready to rock

0

Could you please cite where you are getting this biological definition of evolution?

0

naked truth: how i learned to stop worrying and (sort of) love my body

0

illustrators depict the everyday items giving hope to child refugees

1

swiss unable to maintain neutrality toward delicious pastries

0

suspects chased by cops spin doughnuts on hollywood street

1

waitress only friendly when bringing the check

0

end gun violence by repealing not enacting legislation

1

local newswoman's hairstyle reported on by co-anchor

1

You're right, I'm not interested in your incoherent ramblings, rather I'm annoyed at the bluster of cut and paste spam you've managed to produce. I have no problem with the list, my problem is with your use of "logic". Waxy

0

these are the top 15 u.s. cities for couples, according to rent.com

0

reality, risk & reward: is us kids tv ripe for authenticity and autonomy?

1

suicide bombing a cry for help, vengeance against the infidel

0

david beckham stared down a studio camera: here's what we know

0

poor people's campaign is the angry response to inequality america needs

0

demi lovato drops emotional 'nightingale' music vid

0

adnan syed is getting a second podcast after 'serial'

1

mom sits down for dinner 3 months after rest of family finishes meal

0

bionic fingertip restores amputee's sense of touch

0

how to recover from unicorn hair

0

appeals court won't reconsider bob mcdonnell's case

1

voters shocked christie botched such an easy political cover-up

0

You SERIOUSLY need to take a basic biology course so you can stop sticking your foot in your mouth emoticonXRolleyes An egg is NOT larva, and larva is NOT a caterpillar, and a caterpillar is NOT a butterfly - much the same as a zygote is NOT a embryo, and a embryo is NOT a fetus, and a fetus is NOT a baby, and a baby is NOT an adult. I challenge you to prove that a larva is exactly the same as a butterfly. If you can't even do something as simple as that, then you'll never understand the process/transformation of what a human has to go through, and THAT in and of itself should give you a clue as to how much in denial you are in, and how much you have to twist the truth around just to justify your version of events. Deal with it!

1

rod stewart mistaken for elderly aunt

1

spelling bee champion returns to school a hero, he imagines

0

obama begins sales pitch on trade to wary u.s. public

0

why the rule of law is key to china's modernization

1

historical archives: kid-ney bean shaped organ recently discovered

0

5 things you miss about married life as a divorced mom

1

'boating world magazine' giving live updates as its team of reporters reads all of mueller report

0

So now you're freely and willingly admitting that you'd take pleasure in inflicting pain and suffering on innocent people who have never done anything to you? Good God! No wonder you don't like guns and want to see everyone disarmed!

1

advertiser thought this sponsored post was good idea

0

half of u.s. democrats want joe biden in the 2016 race

1

ticketed motorist pointing finger just the green light cop needed

1

exhilarated woman discovers last person who used jigsaw puzzle left lots of pieces sticking together

1

stolen tour bus leads police on chase of historic downtown philadelphia

1

himalayan goat dies following failed everest climb

0

comedian releases song to find her own rachel maddow

0

poll shows support for birth control mandate on eve of court ruling

1

magical gallery transforms dull objects into art

1

12-year-old who got her hair curled for spring dance the very image of old hollywood glamour

1

man who willingly rented 'wrath of the titans' feels his intelligence has been insulted

0

8 ways to recommit to your fading resolutions

1

side effects sound awesome

1

millions of human beings experiencing actual emotions about j.j. abrams directing 'star wars'

0

Yes, everyone is a "potential" felon. Fortunately most people never commit a felony. And there are many different types of weapons, all which could be used by previously law abiding citizens to commit an act of violence.

1

This is often called: 'talking out of both sides of your mouth'

0

what the house gop isn't telling you about their obamacare repeal bill

1

Well, at least you are more consistent about equality than a lot of people in your movement.

0

how to buy grown-up art without going broke (or setting foot in a gallery)

0

trump reportedly offered vice admiral harward national security adviser job

0

trump praises chuck schumer in reposted tweet that first called him 'cunning'

0

will the charlie hebdo terrorist attack kill intelligence reform in the united states?

1

annoying man more annoying after skydiving

0

breweries donate 205,000 cans of water to harvey victims

0

young mom earns $50 million while caring for two children

0

the forest that fights climate change

0

intuition or ego? 3 simple steps to reach truth

1

'breitbart' refusing to release names of mass shooting victims in order to prevent them from getting attention

0

bill maher gets real about marijuana legalization

1

new employee has never known decadent pleasures of old office

0

ferguson protesters celebrate thanksgiving in a church, boycott black friday

1

So how many locusts, beetles etc. were there on the Ark? Do you think that there were a pair of each species, or just a pair of each "Biblical Type" and could you define what is meant by that term? Would that include all beetles/insects/arthropods/invertebrates or just anything you felt was convenient?

0

what my parents' divorce taught me about heartbreak

1

fred durst spray paints 'limp bizkit' on bridge

0

jon stewart reveals the one thing he'll never do

1

I guess you missed this bit: State Sen. Robert Hagan (D-Youngstown) admits his bill is purely "tongue-in-cheek" but says that the message is anything but a joke. Being a story from a gay news source, maybe you saw the word "tongue" and assumed there'd be a vivid description of some abominable sex act, so you stopped reading, closed your browser window, shut down your computer, dunked it in disinfectant, etc., etc. Or is this just proof you don't read what people post?

0

the science behind why celebrities like ryan lochte tell fibs

0

browns' josh gordon to enter rehab

0

Or that they tend to be better prepared, or even less willing to accept help from others or get breakdown cover. That's the trouble with these kind of stats, the interpretations are pretty open to debate.

0

in the event of a water landing

0

chinese state media threatens donald trump with 'big sticks' if he pushes for a trade war

0

watch john malkovich perform as a 'lady' in david lynch homage

0

'six million dollar man' star martin e. brooks dead at age 90

0

women in business: three generations of women in radio: renee roth, jo-ann silverstein and rachel roth

0

30 days of online dating: naughty by nature

1

hippocratic oath under review by hmo board

1

emotionally abusive social media site continuously manipulating woman into staying

0

lobbying spending hits historic lows

0

hillary clinton really wants you to think she's tough on wall street

0

And think of what other animals have built (and for an actual purpose). Take a look at a bee hive. It's so complex and so perfect for them. They built that. An ant hill is at least 20 times the size of an ant. That's 120 feet for us (for a 6 foot person).

0

trevor noah just sincerely praised donald trump for something

1

dad gets dolled up for trip to lowe's

1

I avert your gaze. I submit myself to your mercy. Henceforth I shall only respond to your web postings. I shall not respond to postings you make on the web....Wait.....

0

watch: meteorologist evacuates during live tornado report

0

nasa joins twitter users to name those newly discovered planets. the inevitable happens.

0

björk retrospective at moma, new york (video)

1

But at one time society accepted that slavery was right. So, Abraham Lincoln, how dare you try and impose your own personal moral code on me. We have the right to own slaves via the Constitution and various laws of the society, and because it's in the Constitution and protected by laws, it obviously means society agrees that slavery is not wrong. Therefore, slavery is not wrong.