daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
1	jpmorgan chase acquires bear stearns in tedious-to-read news article
0	barry jenkins quietly makes history with oscar nomination trifecta
0	The other forest does not photosynthesize all year round, the other forest is also in just as much danger as the rainforest. For some reason, radical environmentalists choose to place undue emphasis on the de-forestation of rainforest rather than global forest as a whole.
0	They do not differ in any significant way. The living species today closely resemble the fossils. The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years. Furthermore, it was based upon the fossil record, which is supposedly shows how everything evolved.
1	struggling don rickles has nothing but nice things to say about audience
1	cdc warns once-eradicated jitterbug spreading across country at rate not seen since 1940s
1	k-pop group bts excited for first american tour since 1963 appearance on 'ed sullivan'
1	man feels less guilty about gentrifying eastern european neighborhood
0	Well, then. They're not TROO christians. Just ask a certain poster on this board. When I told this certain poster that I have known several clergymen from several Christian denominations who accepted evolutionary theory, that's what he told me. That certain poster and others would rather claim Newton, who was an arian, as a christian rather than clergymen who accept the divinity of Christ. Those clergy just understand both science and religion better.
0	alec baldwin: it's tough to impersonate the greatest presidential impersonator of all time
0	jenna fischer reveals what pam told michael during his 'office' goodbye episode
0	5 things to do the minute you retire
1	area cow doesn't suspect a thing
0	sweet briar college and the homogenization of u.s. higher education
1	u.s. urges bin laden to form nation it can attack
0	It's ashame that everyone keeps looking for the judiciary to do the legislature's work. When will the people press Congress to take up abortion? It is the job of Congress after all, to address the issues desired by it's constituents.
1	local hamburger to star in national ad
0	scottish independence: proudly small or proudly together?
0	But you're missing one important fact. NONE of those "reasons" are required for marriage. Absolutely none of them. Any combination of man/woman can marry for whatever reason they want. Even if it's just drunken fun.
1	Sure, Etel. Guess that's why there's over 1 billion Christians today. Pray to Christ and he can open your eyes.
1	No, you wouldn't have. I'd have a better chance of winning the lottery without buying a ticket.
0	game-changing plays from week 3 in the nfl
0	Really? Have you ever heard of population genetics? Do you know what Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is? Do you actually think that you are so bright that you have insight that generations of biologists and mathematicians don't. Population genetics is exactly the calculations of how mutatiions spread through populations.
1	madonna gives birth to million-dollar marketing scheme
0	remember that time donald trump almost bought an nfl team?
0	huffpollster: carly fiorina probably won't help ted cruz save his campaign
1	art object purchased at office depot
0	Too late, drug usage has already created those epidemics. Legalizing drugs may increase some of them temporarily, but they already exist. I would argue that there would be a decrease in crime, for certain.
0	lawsuit accusing trump of inciting rally violence gets green light from judge
1	government-publications enthusiast makes pilgrimage to pueblo, co
1	holocaust survivors recall exact day holocaust started right out of the blue
0	here's why ohio state won't repeat
0	trump calls failed bid to repeal obamacare 'pretty impressive'
0	raucous town hall in utah blasts gop rep. chaffetz over trump
0	hydraulic press proves that diamonds are sadly not forever
0	Again, nonrandom is not the same as Lamarckian. Phenotypic variation can be nonrandom because the organisms can select the most attractive/successful mates with whom to breed. Once again, you're totally stuck on one aspect of the ToE, random mutation; the ToE is much more than that.
1	quentin tarantino breaks three-day media silence
0	gina rodriguez is giving trailblazing women the awards show they deserve
0	'trust no one:' a talk with jayne ann krentz
1	bush to lovely chilean ambassador:'i must paint you'
0	i was, but now i am
0	house republicans are trying to tell the senate what to do with its filibuster
0	steve wilson on 'the making of gone with the wind'
1	bachmann says unexplained blackouts from which she wakes up covered in blood won't affect ability to lead
0	women in business q&a: tooba marwat, owner, signarama
0	And you're quite naive if you think that emotional examples mean anything against the facts. The so-called "Partial Birth" Abortion is quite rare and usually only performed to save the mother's life, but now they're going to have to let the mother die because Dubya has banned this now thus the first step to going back to the "good old days" when women were nothing more than property. You're the sick one. Also, with your resorting to such tactics shows that you are losing. BTW, isn't putting "Your god" under your name somewhat sacrilegious by putting yourself above your god? I guess that I'll be seeing you in Hell.
1	new subway promotion to honor subtember 11
1	lone superdelegate voting for martin o'malley feels like total fucking idiot
0	former pennsylvania congressman sentenced to 10 years in prison
0	brazil's senate votes to remove president dilma rousseff from office
0	By all means, burn those books . . . er, I mean, take down those nativity scenes.
1	It's as much of a point that Phillp Johnson has. Trying to use Philip Johnson as a source about evolution is like trying to use Jack Chick as a source about Catholism.
0	But you need proof to back up a explantion. If you didn't, all you'd have a creationism. Explanations without any support.
0	indian country all too familiar with rachel dolezals of the world
0	why you should hire for zest
0	they wore it best: miami's most glam moments of 2014
0	will tax reform close the gaps?
0	gifs: the memphis grizzlies weathered this epic oklahoma city thunder storm
1	obama urges young voters to ignore how many lousy candidates democratic party runs
0	aisle view: the queen takes the stage
0	the results are in: social enterprise works
0	elementary school teacher accused in rape of former student
1	doctor advises man with healthy blood pressure to really fucking let it rip
0	celebrating my independence from drug addiction
1	fd&c blue #5 to restore beauty of world's oceans
1	heaven adds guardrail after fifth angel plunges over edge
0	Actually, this (if what that article is true, which I am not quite sure) is a healthy part of science. Old theories are disgarded and new ones come in as more evidence is brought to bare. Every theory made by fallible man is prone to being disproven and destroyed. Man's theories change everyday, while God's word has remained the same.
0	let's raise a glass to pink for gleefully slamming the troll who hacked her instagram
0	title ix administrators discuss emotional demands of job
1	frozen tundra of emptiness stretching out forever and ever weighed against date with mike4763
1	which is pretty much the same thing. The majority of representatives get their way. The representatives are elected by a majority. Being overally picky about it gets you no where...we pretty much have a majority rules nation. And we still haven't settled the question about how you think you can impose your belief on others but I can't. The "convention" idea didn't work, the idea that you aren't imposing a belief on others didn't work, so what is next?
1	But you still feel they have the right idea when it comes to firearms?
0	your four-legged friends are leaving a serious carbon pawprint on the planet
0	jerry brown: 'troglodyte' trump supporters 'dwell in deep, dark caves'
0	my lust for the little frenchie!
0	the valentine's day cards of your wildest lesbian dreams (nsfw)
1	pope francis attends outdoor mass in cutoff denim vestments
0	No. It doesn't refer to "advances" of life over time at all. It refers to changes of life over time. To call any of those changes "advances" is subjective.
1	Oh but he is different in the mule's tiny mind. The Southern Baptist types are Christian and so uphold the mule's way of life, so it's alright for them to call for mass death.
0	What we have here is simply a perspective problem, which is the problem with most debates. I see the Bible as sound, and every "error" in the Bible I have researched (I have admittedly not researched them all) have been refuted.
0	the new 'batman v superman: dawn of justice' trailer totally delivers
1	How can they visually express themselves without their right to expression, besides funky hairdoos.
0	chipotle is making big changes but nobody really cares
0	The only 'duty' that any human being has with a parasite is to extract it as quickly as they can, if they chose to do so.
1	popeye's home boiglerized
0	read 'death of a king: the real story of dr. martin luther king jr.'s final year' by tavis smiley
1	I presume that you mean "non-sequitur" and "absolutely". But nevertheless, you're going to have to explain and support that assertion before any thinking person could possibly give it any credence. You're going to have to give examples of scientific evidence and theories that have been called a "fact" that are based on nothing or a non-sequitur. Really. This is a debate. Put up or shut up. Support your ignorant assertions or go away. By the way, at what university did you earn your degree in evolutionary biology? I suspect that you didn't.
0	thursday's morning email: north korea may be prepping its most powerful nuclear test
1	poll: ted cruz currently leads among voters disputing boundaries of neighbor's yard
0	And I would like to know why that is. I asked the question in post #2 and got no answer. Are laypersons lacking in intelligence so much that its hopeless for them to be on the same communication level with scientists? Since they share the same society, put their pants on one leg at a time in the same way, eat, sleep, and share economic processes in comparable ways, it seems to me it would be beneficial for them and laypersons both to understand each other when they use identical terms. (like the word, theory)
1	michelle obama can still hear their little labored breaths when she closes her eyes
0	nbc nabs trump interview, and msnbc plays it on seemingly infinite loop
1	st. peter scrambling to throw few more innocent souls into hell to meet monthly quota
1	coworker who just threw fit and stormed out of room looked like total badass
0	all quiet except cruz. and did you read about al gore?
0	Too much spin there buddy. The potentiality arguement is used by those who believe women have a right to have control over their fertility. As an aside it is also a fundemental tenent in Judaism's view of the unborn- the foetus is a potential life, but has not yet attained that state of being, which occurs at birth.
1	You're pulling my leg, right? I've been hiring scientists for well over 20 years now and you're going to pull up a wiki reference, that I can edit myself, to prove me wrong? emoticonXWow Tell me, have you ever met an engineer or a scientist? Have you ever seen the curricula that they take or do you just pull statements from your posterior?
0	my favorite love story
0	pope francis' silent response to the filipino girl: what he might have been thinking
0	a recap of snowden's talk in hawaii (video)

1

jpmorgan chase acquires bear stearns in tedious-to-read news article

0

barry jenkins quietly makes history with oscar nomination trifecta

0

The other forest does not photosynthesize all year round, the other forest is also in just as much danger as the rainforest. For some reason, radical environmentalists choose to place undue emphasis on the de-forestation of rainforest rather than global forest as a whole.

0

They do not differ in any significant way. The living species today closely resemble the fossils. The prediction was made based on the mindset that everything evolved from a common ancestor over billions of years. Furthermore, it was based upon the fossil record, which is supposedly shows how everything evolved.

1

struggling don rickles has nothing but nice things to say about audience

1

cdc warns once-eradicated jitterbug spreading across country at rate not seen since 1940s

1

k-pop group bts excited for first american tour since 1963 appearance on 'ed sullivan'

1

man feels less guilty about gentrifying eastern european neighborhood

0

Well, then. They're not TROO christians. Just ask a certain poster on this board. When I told this certain poster that I have known several clergymen from several Christian denominations who accepted evolutionary theory, that's what he told me. That certain poster and others would rather claim Newton, who was an arian, as a christian rather than clergymen who accept the divinity of Christ. Those clergy just understand both science and religion better.

0

alec baldwin: it's tough to impersonate the greatest presidential impersonator of all time

0

jenna fischer reveals what pam told michael during his 'office' goodbye episode

0

5 things to do the minute you retire

1

area cow doesn't suspect a thing

0

sweet briar college and the homogenization of u.s. higher education

1

u.s. urges bin laden to form nation it can attack

0

It's ashame that everyone keeps looking for the judiciary to do the legislature's work. When will the people press Congress to take up abortion? It is the job of Congress after all, to address the issues desired by it's constituents.

1

local hamburger to star in national ad

0

scottish independence: proudly small or proudly together?

0

But you're missing one important fact. NONE of those "reasons" are required for marriage. Absolutely none of them. Any combination of man/woman can marry for whatever reason they want. Even if it's just drunken fun.

1

Sure, Etel. Guess that's why there's over 1 billion Christians today. Pray to Christ and he can open your eyes.

1

No, you wouldn't have. I'd have a better chance of winning the lottery without buying a ticket.

0

game-changing plays from week 3 in the nfl

0

Really? Have you ever heard of population genetics? Do you know what Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is? Do you actually think that you are so bright that you have insight that generations of biologists and mathematicians don't. Population genetics is exactly the calculations of how mutatiions spread through populations.

1

madonna gives birth to million-dollar marketing scheme

0

remember that time donald trump almost bought an nfl team?

0

huffpollster: carly fiorina probably won't help ted cruz save his campaign

1

art object purchased at office depot

0

Too late, drug usage has already created those epidemics. Legalizing drugs may increase some of them temporarily, but they already exist. I would argue that there would be a decrease in crime, for certain.

0

lawsuit accusing trump of inciting rally violence gets green light from judge

1

government-publications enthusiast makes pilgrimage to pueblo, co

1

holocaust survivors recall exact day holocaust started right out of the blue

0

here's why ohio state won't repeat

0

trump calls failed bid to repeal obamacare 'pretty impressive'

0

raucous town hall in utah blasts gop rep. chaffetz over trump

0

hydraulic press proves that diamonds are sadly not forever

0

Again, nonrandom is not the same as Lamarckian. Phenotypic variation can be nonrandom because the organisms can select the most attractive/successful mates with whom to breed. Once again, you're totally stuck on one aspect of the ToE, random mutation; the ToE is much more than that.

1

quentin tarantino breaks three-day media silence

0

gina rodriguez is giving trailblazing women the awards show they deserve

0

'trust no one:' a talk with jayne ann krentz

1

bush to lovely chilean ambassador:'i must paint you'

0

i was, but now i am

0

house republicans are trying to tell the senate what to do with its filibuster

0

steve wilson on 'the making of gone with the wind'

1

bachmann says unexplained blackouts from which she wakes up covered in blood won't affect ability to lead

0

women in business q&a: tooba marwat, owner, signarama

0

And you're quite naive if you think that emotional examples mean anything against the facts. The so-called "Partial Birth" Abortion is quite rare and usually only performed to save the mother's life, but now they're going to have to let the mother die because Dubya has banned this now thus the first step to going back to the "good old days" when women were nothing more than property. You're the sick one. Also, with your resorting to such tactics shows that you are losing. BTW, isn't putting "Your god" under your name somewhat sacrilegious by putting yourself above your god? I guess that I'll be seeing you in Hell.

1

new subway promotion to honor subtember 11

1

lone superdelegate voting for martin o'malley feels like total fucking idiot

0

former pennsylvania congressman sentenced to 10 years in prison

0

brazil's senate votes to remove president dilma rousseff from office

0

By all means, burn those books . . . er, I mean, take down those nativity scenes.

1

It's as much of a point that Phillp Johnson has. Trying to use Philip Johnson as a source about evolution is like trying to use Jack Chick as a source about Catholism.

0

But you need proof to back up a explantion. If you didn't, all you'd have a creationism. Explanations without any support.

0

indian country all too familiar with rachel dolezals of the world

0

why you should hire for zest

0

they wore it best: miami's most glam moments of 2014

0

will tax reform close the gaps?

0

gifs: the memphis grizzlies weathered this epic oklahoma city thunder storm

1

obama urges young voters to ignore how many lousy candidates democratic party runs

0

aisle view: the queen takes the stage

0

the results are in: social enterprise works

0

elementary school teacher accused in rape of former student

1

doctor advises man with healthy blood pressure to really fucking let it rip

0

celebrating my independence from drug addiction

1

fd&c blue #5 to restore beauty of world's oceans

1

heaven adds guardrail after fifth angel plunges over edge

0

Actually, this (if what that article is true, which I am not quite sure) is a healthy part of science. Old theories are disgarded and new ones come in as more evidence is brought to bare. Every theory made by fallible man is prone to being disproven and destroyed. Man's theories change everyday, while God's word has remained the same.

0

let's raise a glass to pink for gleefully slamming the troll who hacked her instagram

0

title ix administrators discuss emotional demands of job

1

frozen tundra of emptiness stretching out forever and ever weighed against date with mike4763

1

which is pretty much the same thing. The majority of representatives get their way. The representatives are elected by a majority. Being overally picky about it gets you no where...we pretty much have a majority rules nation. And we still haven't settled the question about how you think you can impose your belief on others but I can't. The "convention" idea didn't work, the idea that you aren't imposing a belief on others didn't work, so what is next?

1

But you still feel they have the right idea when it comes to firearms?

0

your four-legged friends are leaving a serious carbon pawprint on the planet

0

jerry brown: 'troglodyte' trump supporters 'dwell in deep, dark caves'

0

my lust for the little frenchie!

0

the valentine's day cards of your wildest lesbian dreams (nsfw)

1

pope francis attends outdoor mass in cutoff denim vestments

0

No. It doesn't refer to "advances" of life over time at all. It refers to changes of life over time. To call any of those changes "advances" is subjective.

1

Oh but he is different in the mule's tiny mind. The Southern Baptist types are Christian and so uphold the mule's way of life, so it's alright for them to call for mass death.

0

What we have here is simply a perspective problem, which is the problem with most debates. I see the Bible as sound, and every "error" in the Bible I have researched (I have admittedly not researched them all) have been refuted.

0

the new 'batman v superman: dawn of justice' trailer totally delivers

1

How can they visually express themselves without their right to expression, besides funky hairdoos.

0

chipotle is making big changes but nobody really cares

0

The only 'duty' that any human being has with a parasite is to extract it as quickly as they can, if they chose to do so.

1

popeye's home boiglerized

0

read 'death of a king: the real story of dr. martin luther king jr.'s final year' by tavis smiley

1

I presume that you mean "non-sequitur" and "absolutely". But nevertheless, you're going to have to explain and support that assertion before any thinking person could possibly give it any credence. You're going to have to give examples of scientific evidence and theories that have been called a "fact" that are based on nothing or a non-sequitur. Really. This is a debate. Put up or shut up. Support your ignorant assertions or go away. By the way, at what university did you earn your degree in evolutionary biology? I suspect that you didn't.

0

thursday's morning email: north korea may be prepping its most powerful nuclear test

1

poll: ted cruz currently leads among voters disputing boundaries of neighbor's yard

0

And I would like to know why that is. I asked the question in post #2 and got no answer. Are laypersons lacking in intelligence so much that its hopeless for them to be on the same communication level with scientists? Since they share the same society, put their pants on one leg at a time in the same way, eat, sleep, and share economic processes in comparable ways, it seems to me it would be beneficial for them and laypersons both to understand each other when they use identical terms. (like the word, theory)

1

michelle obama can still hear their little labored breaths when she closes her eyes

0

nbc nabs trump interview, and msnbc plays it on seemingly infinite loop

1

st. peter scrambling to throw few more innocent souls into hell to meet monthly quota

1

coworker who just threw fit and stormed out of room looked like total badass

0

all quiet except cruz. and did you read about al gore?

0

Too much spin there buddy. The potentiality arguement is used by those who believe women have a right to have control over their fertility. As an aside it is also a fundemental tenent in Judaism's view of the unborn- the foetus is a potential life, but has not yet attained that state of being, which occurs at birth.

1

You're pulling my leg, right? I've been hiring scientists for well over 20 years now and you're going to pull up a wiki reference, that I can edit myself, to prove me wrong? emoticonXWow Tell me, have you ever met an engineer or a scientist? Have you ever seen the curricula that they take or do you just pull statements from your posterior?

0

my favorite love story

0

pope francis' silent response to the filipino girl: what he might have been thinking

0

a recap of snowden's talk in hawaii (video)