id int64 4 458k | target_text stringlengths 33 45.8k ⌀ | verdict stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
80,246 | (Against All Defendants for Violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and 17 C.F.R. § 244.100 Promulgated Thereunder) (Against the Individual Defendants for Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act) (Against All Defendants for Violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 Promulg... | lose |
368,025 | 22. Broadspectrum serves the oil drilling industry by providing clients operating oil refineries with skilled personnel who specialize in planning, implementing, and executing safety protocols for oil refinery operations. Broadspectrum provides services throughout the United States, including in California. 47.... | win |
233,398 | (Failure to Pay Overtime Wages) 18. Magellan operates and has operated “call centers” in Arizona and across the nation where telephone-dedicated employees similar to Plaintiff handle phone calls regarding various call center services including medical authorization and insurance inquiries offered by Magellan to i... | win |
321,156 | 11. Bobcat is an American-based manufacturer and a leading provider of compact equipment for use in various markets, from agriculture to construction. 12. Bobcat introduced the world’s first skid-steer loader in 1960. Skid-steer loaders are labor-saving vehicles commonly used in the agriculture, construction, and ... | win |
271,583 | 16. Applied Consultants employs inspectors, such as Plaintiff, who perform a variety of inspection services on oil and gas pipelines for energy, public utility and pipeline companies in this judicial district and throughout the United States. 18. Applied Consultants charges its inspectors’ services out to Applied... | win |
257,085 | 19. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered above herein with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein. 20. Some time prior to January 07, 2016, an obligation was allegedly incurred by Plaintiff to Capital One, N.A.. 21. The ... | lose |
35,434 | 23. Defendant manufactures, markets and sells the following misbranded Products throughout the United States: i. Ricola Cherry Honey herb throat drops ii. Ricola Honey Lemon with Echinacea cough suppressant throat drops iii. Ricola Lemon Mint herb throat drops iv. Ricola Sugar-free Lemon Mint herb throat dro... | lose |
261,991 | 1. Grammer is a resident of the State of Indiana and is currently domiciled in Peru, Miami County, Indiana. Earlier in 2020, Grammer resided in Kokomo, Howard County, Indiana. During the first week after he was first hired by Wright (in early February 2020), Grammer resided in Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana. 10... | win |
211,270 | 28. Plaintiffs and similarly situated employees work or worked for Defendants as general laborers during the applicable statutory period. 30. Defendants compensated Plaintiffs and similarly situated employees for their work on an hourly basis. 31. Defendants suffered and permitted Plaintiffs and similarly situate... | win |
54,024 | 43. The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder is impracticable. The number of Class Members is approximately 360. The number of job applicants harmed by Defendant’s violations of the law is significantly greater than feasibly could be addressed through joinder. The precise number is uniquely within D... | win |
24,183 | 30. On April 29, 2014, Plaintiff registered his cell phone number on the 44. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and Rule 23(b)(3) on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and seeks certification of the following Classes: Pre-recorded No Consent Class: A... | win |
6,838 | 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. On behalf of Plaintiff and the Class 37. On April 29, 2018, Plaintiff took a tour of Atlas Apartments (“Atlas”), a modern apartment complex located at 1036 7th Avenue NW, Issaquah, Washington 98027. 65. Class Definition: Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil ... | win |
50,352 | 23. Microwave ovens have been ubiquitous in American kitchens for several decades. Consumers have become accustomed to the simplicity and quick cooking that microwave ovens provide, and rely upon manufacturers, including Sharp, to ensure their safe and efficient use. 24. Sharp is a household name, and one in whi... | lose |
437,507 | (Violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. – Telephone Consumer Protection Act) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 16. Given the relatively low cost associated with sending bulk text messages, many businesses have turned to disseminating advertising calls or promotions through mass text message campaigns. 17. ... | win |
310,124 | 10. The putative class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. The size of the putative class is believed to be in excess of 40 individuals. In addition, the names of all potential members of the putative class are not known. 11. Questions of law and fact common to the putative class predom... | win |
136,960 | VIOLATIONS OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT 15 U.S.C. §1692e et seq. 1. The amount of the debt; 10. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 11. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New Jers... | win |
114,384 | 1. a statement that the recipient is legally entitled to opt-out of receiving future faxed advertisements – knowing that he or she has the legal right to request an opt-out gives impetus for recipients to make such a request, if desired; 14. Defendants transmitted by telephone facsimile machine the Fax Ads to Pla... | win |
96,414 | 13. Upon information and belief, on or about February 2, 2015, Defendants without Plaintiff’s express invitation or permission, arranged for and/or caused a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send unsolicited fax advertisements (hereinafter “the fax advertisements”), advertising the commercial... | win |
174,220 | 31. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§ 207 & 216(b), Plaintiff brings his First Cause of Action as a collective action under the FLSA on behalf of himself and the following collective: All individuals employed by Defendants at any time since January 14, 2018 and through the entry of judgment in this case (the “Collective Ac... | win |
264,236 | 15. Demark is a professional consulting and engineering firm that provides technical and support services for all aspects of the Power (Fossil, Wind, Solar, Nuclear) and Petro Chemical Industry. 16. Demark provides expertise and support services to major projects in the power industry across the United States.1... | win |
142,439 | 13. Defendant employs personnel who provide consulting services to its customers. Upon information and belief, these personnel are specialized project management employees for the clients of Defendant and are essentially temporary employees assigned to work at Defendant’s clients’ locations for the duration of such... | win |
435,224 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibi... | lose |
220,167 | 11. Plaintiff brings claims, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”) Rule 23, individually and on behalf of the following nationwide consumer class (the “Class”): All New York consumers who were sent collection letters and/or notice from Defendant attempting to collect an obligation ... | lose |
326,403 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
226,845 | (Declaratory Relief) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 106. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations as if set forth fully herein. 107. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and believes that Defendan... | lose |
377,279 | 21. Defendant is a media company that owns and operates the website, www.cnn.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. 22. Defendant’s Website offers its ... | win |
63,644 | 19. The Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, seeks to certify a New York City subclass under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(2): all legally blind persons in the City of New York who have attempted to access the Defendant’s website and as a result have been denied access to the equal en... | lose |
363,472 | 10. Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 11. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom Defendant sent a response to a consumer’s dispute; c. that failed to include billing statements that... | win |
343,594 | (Collective Action Claim for FLSA Violations) (Individual Claims for FLSA Violations) 21. Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege all previous paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully incorporated in this section. 22. Defendant’s primary business purpose is to coordinate and conduct medical research and clinical ... | lose |
173,872 | 21. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein. 22. Plaintiff Olvera reviewed the Product’s label, nutritional label, supplement facts and marketing material prior to purchasing the Product. 23. Defendant provides retailers such as BB with label images and marketing materials.... | lose |
55,998 | 10. Defendant John Andrew Baio is the owner or operator of Pro Tree Service. 11. Defendants John Baio is involved in the daily operation of Defendant Pro Tree Service including but not limited to: a) hiring and firing employees b) directing employees' work; and c) exercising control over Plaintiff's and simila... | win |
350,037 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
253,361 | 18. In an effort to increase business, Smartpay has sent thousands of text messages to consumers nationwide. 19. In early 2016, Plaintiff received a cellular phone from Defendant. However, a few months later, due to defective equipment, Plaintiff returned the item and ceased any relationship with Defendant. ... | win |
177,948 | 21. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 20 of this complaint and incorporates them by reference. 5. Snow Joe is a distributor of snow blowers, lawn mowers, and other tools. Violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227 (On Behalf of Plaintiff and the ATDS Class) | lose |
102,540 | 45. The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. While the exact number of Class members is unknown to Plaintiff at this time and can only be ascertained through appropriate discovery, Plaintiff believes that there are at least thousands of members in the proposed Class. ... | lose |
150,830 | 20. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, on behalf of the following “Class”: All persons in the United States who purchased tickets for travel on a Swoop flight scheduled to operate to, from, or within the United States whose flights were cancelled or were subject to a signi... | win |
45,839 | 29. During the Federal Robocall Class Period, Spark initiated, to residential telephones lines and to telephone numbers assigned to a cellular telephone service, thousands of telephone calls using a prerecorded voice to deliver a message for the purpose of encouraging the purchase or rental of energy-discount services ... | lose |
14,319 | 15. The Papacy, or the office of the Pope, known as the Supreme Pontiff, operates and controls the HOLY SEE. The Pope is assisted in the administration of the HOLY SEE and the world-wide Roman Catholic Church by the Roman Curia, which is the administrative headquarters of the HOLY SEE. 16. The HOLY SEE and... | lose |
402,487 | FOR OVER HALF OF TOTAL IQ LOSS FROM CHILDREN’S EXPOSURES TO ARSENIC AND LEAD IN BABY FOOD ............................................................ 36 APPENDIX F: DATA AND CALCULATIONS—AVERAGE HEAVY METALS LEVELS FROM CHILDREN’S EXPOSURES TO ARSENIC AND LEAD IN BABY FOOD Healthy Babies Bright Futures (HBBF) comm... | lose |
110,743 | 14. Plaintiff brings claims, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”) Rule 23, individually and on behalf of the following consumer class (the “Class”) consisting of: a) All consumers who have an address in the state of Texas b) who were sent an initial collection letter from the Defen... | win |
188,738 | 21. Defendant is a 3D printed kids toys company that owns and operates the website, shop.make.toys (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. 22. Defendant’s W... | win |
32,102 | 15. At all times relevant, Plaintiff Wolf was an individual residing in the State of Maryland. However, from 2010 to 2014, Plaintiff resided in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 16. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 27. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and ... | lose |
51,399 | 14. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of Florida. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (39). 15. Blowoutpicks.com is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a corporation and “persons,” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (39). 16. ... | lose |
125,763 | (Fair Labor Standards Act Violations) (Violations of Ohio Revised Code 4111.03) 16. Defendant is a home health care business. 17. Plaintiff Richard Wells has been employed by Defendant since November 2015. 4 18. At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff has been employed by Defendant as a home health aide. ... | win |
56,180 | 26. Defendants operate a luxury car and limousine transportation business, using an integrated network of transportation, communication, and dispatch facilities. 27. During the relevant periods, upon information and belief, Carey N.Y. has employed over two hundred Drivers to pick up, transport, and drop off passe... | win |
373,360 | 26. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, individually and on behalf of the stockholders of Proteostasis’ common stock who are being and will be harmed by Defendants’ actions described herein (the “Class”). The Class specifically excludes Defendants herein, and any person, fi... | lose |
164,422 | 11. Plaintiff brings claims for relief pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“F.R.C.P.”) Rule 23, on behalf of all employees who were paid their wages in cash employed by Defendants on or after the date that is six years before the filing of the Complaint in this case as defined herein (the “Class Period... | lose |
303,178 | 13. At all times material hereto, Defendants were each agents, servants, employees and/or representatives of each other and acted within the course and scope of their employment and/or agency and/or acted for a common purpose or as part of a joint venture. 14. This Class Action lawsuit deals with all current and ... | lose |
397,180 | 91. Aside from selecting proprietary mutual funds that charged excessive fees and had a track record of poor performance, Defendants also failed to adequately investigate non- mutual fund alternatives such as collective trusts and separately managed accounts. 93. Separate accounts offer a number of advantages over... | win |
323,384 | 10. In the Complaint, RPI alleges breach of contract and breach of trust causes of action against Deutsche Bank. RPI alleges that, although required by the Governing Agreements and its duty as trustee, Deutsche Bank willfully ignored and failed to effectuate the repurchase of mortgage loans in the Covered Trusts th... | lose |
421,061 | 12. Shortly thereafter, Plaintiff began receiving text messages from Capital One on his cellular phone. 13. The Plaintiff’s cellular phone number is identified as 757-###-5014. 14. Based upon information and belief, the Defendant sent the text messages using an automatic dialing system as defined by 47 U.S... | win |
77,118 | 10. Cabela’s is a specialty retailer and is the world’s largest direct marketer, of hunting, fishing, camping, and related outdoor merchandise. In 2015, Cabela’s had nearly $4 billion in revenue. 11. At the end of 2015, Cabela’s operated 77 retail stores in 36 states and in six Canadian provinces. 12. Cabela’s,... | win |
290,509 | 10. Plaintiff, via his counsel, sent Defendant written correspondence dated May 22, 2012, regarding his account ending in 5618, and in such correspondence, notified Defendant that he was represented by counsel and demanded that Defendant cease and desist from engaging in any and all direct communications with Plain... | lose |
167,990 | 10. Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its calls to Plaintiff seeking to solicit its services. 22. Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, as a member the two proposed classes (hereafter, jointly, “... | lose |
368,780 | 18. Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. is a debt collection company and operates several call centers throughout the United States.2 19. Plaintiff and the Putative Class Members’ job duties consisted of making and answering phone calls made by debtors, and would attempt to collect on these outstanding debts. ... | win |
75,087 | 10. The link from the text message is connected to a website for “Paul R. Marino, Principal Broker Landfall Properties, LLC.” 11. There is a link on that site that indicates that the sight is “POWERED BY REALBIRD” 13. The Website further indicates that the service includes two text messages per phone call in a sec... | win |
184,575 | (CONVERSION) (UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE § 17200 ET SEQ.) (UNJUST ENRICHMENT) (VIOLATION OF CAL. CIV. CODE § 980(A)(2), COMMON LAW MISAPPROPRIATION, COMMON-LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION) (VIOLATION OF RIGHTS OF PUBLICITY UNDER CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 3344 AND 3344.1) (VIOLATION OF RIGHTS OF PUBLICIT... | lose |
394,653 | 29. Defendant hired Plaintiffs and other similarly situated employees to perform various food and beverage service tasks. 30. Plaintiffs and others similarly situated hold or held the title of server. Their duties were typical of those associated with their role. Their duties primarily consisted of serving f... | lose |
405,347 | 20. On July 2, 2019, Harborside (then named Lineage Grow company Ltd.), filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities its Unaudited Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements For The Three Months Ended April 30, 2019 And 2018 (the " 1 Q 19 Report"... | lose |
310,529 | 14. Defendant FullStory develops a software of the same name that provides marketing analytics. 15. One of FullStory’s features is called “Session Replay,” which purports to help businesses improve their website design and customer experience. 16. Session Replay provides a real-time recording of a user’s int... | lose |
150,037 | 22. From the time the Safe Rides program launched until approximately June 21, 2014, drivers on the LIberX platform did so under a form contract with Rasier, LLC; that contract—first implemented in 2013 was called the "Transportation Provider Service Agreement." (A true and correct copy of that agreement is attached to... | lose |
249,615 | ACTION Brief description of cause: CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION | lose |
154,517 | 10. Defendant’s calls were placed to telephone number assigned to a cellular telephone service for which Plaintiff incurs a charge for incoming calls pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1). 11. Accordingly, Defendant never received Plaintiff’s “prior express consent” to receive calls using an automatic telephone dia... | lose |
206,301 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
374,073 | 33. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference the allegations contained in all preceding paragraphs of this complaint. 34. Plaintiff Cesarini brings this claim individually and on behalf of the members of the proposed California Subclass against Defendants. 35. This cause of action is brought pursuant to Cali... | lose |
98,252 | 22. Under § 403(d) of the FDCA (21 U.S.C. § 343(d)), a food shall be deemed to be misbranded “[i]f its container is so made, formed, or filled as to be misleading.” 25. The possibility that some portion of the slack-fill in Defendant’s Product may be justified as functional based on the exemptions in §100.100(a)... | win |
3,154 | VIOLATION OF THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT CLASS ALLEGATIONS 11. For a small fee, any person or entity can access all the information in the Fraud Alert database on any consumer at anytime using a website maintained by the Defendant. 12. Thus, consumers that have ever applied for a loan with a Fr... | lose |
212,993 | 1. The amount of the debt; 13. Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 4 14. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom Defendant Law Offices sent an initial collection letter attempting to... | win |
156,131 | 21. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the alleged Debt”). 22. The alleged Debt is an alleged obligation of Plaintiff to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household pu... | lose |
104,903 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibility... | win |
120,500 | 101. Local Rule 23-1 provides that a party seeking to maintain a class must include in the complaint “a reference to each part of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 that the party relies on in seeking to maintain the case as a class action.” Plaintiff complies with this rule in this Section VII. 102. Plaintiff sues on his own be... | lose |
444,379 | 13. Plaintiff never provided permission to Defendant to call her wireless telephone number nor to contact her regarding any goods or services offered by Defendant. 14. Plaintiff received eight phone calls to her wireless phone from 718-355-9952 between June 9, 2014 and June 20, 2014. These calls were received by... | win |
272,489 | 24. “ATDS Class” Definition. Plaintiff brings this civil class action on behalf of herself individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. The “Class” which Plaintiff seeks to represent is comprised of and defined as follows: All... | win |
57,972 | 10. Despite attempting to opt out receiving these pre-recorded unsolicsated telephone calls from Defendant on Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, the calls continued, unabatted. 11. Plaintiff has no knowledge of how Defendant obtained his cellular telephone number and did not give Defendant, express or implied permiss... | lose |
171,916 | 8. Beginning in or around October of 2015, Defendant Spark contacted Plaintiffs on their residential home telephone, (267) 761-9427, in an effort to sell or solicit its services. 9. Specifically, Defendant Spark, calling from (215) 621-8358, placed telephone calls to Plaintiffs’ home telephone utilizing a pre... | lose |
402,551 | 10. TrainingWheel’s financial results are significantly driven by the number of consultants providing training and support services for TrainingWheel’s customers and the fees that TrainingWheel charges the customers for these services. 11. Between 2010 and 2018, Plaintiff Freeman worked as a consultant for Tr... | win |
100,798 | 10. In September 2014, Plaintiff purchased a medical device from Defendant that requires him to periodically purchase supplies for its continued use. 12. Defendant calls Plaintiff at least every three months and plays the same prerecorded message each time. If plaintiff does not answer his phone, or does not pla... | lose |
159,825 | 76. This action is brought as a class action. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 77. The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendant and th... | win |
99,540 | 24. Defendant is an automotive retailer. Defendant is an online retailer of new and used cars, specializing in connecting sellers and buyers using algorithms and data analytics. Defendant owns, operates, manages, and controls the website, www.cargurus.com (its “Website”), which allows Defendant to sell vehicles on ... | win |
42,403 | (On behalf of Nationwide Breach Class and Missouri Subclass) (On behalf of Nationwide Declaratory Judgment Class and Missouri Subclass) 27. The novel coronavirus – named “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” or “SARS-CoV2” – has spread widely and rapidly across the United States. The illness related t... | lose |
358,414 | (California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200) (Unjust Enrichment / Quasi-Contract / Restitution) 17. Plaintiffs hereby re-incorporate and re-allege paragraphs all the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 18. LIVING ESSENTIALS’ actions constitute unlawful and unfair conduct w... | win |
8,920 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
373,969 | 15. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §207, Plaintiffs seek to prosecute her FLSA claims as a 5 collective action on behalf of all persons who are or were formerly employed by Defendant at any time since June 26, 2015 (time tolled by failure to post notice) to the entry of judgment in this case (the “Collective Action Period”... | win |
422,260 | 14. Plaintiff, Bart Deardorff is a resident of the State of Illinois and a former employee of Defendants. 15. Plaintiff brings claims for relief for violation of the FLSA as a collective action pursuant to Section 16(b) of the FLSA (29 U.S.C. § 216(b)), on behalf of all employees of ATI who were, are, or will be... | win |
63,574 | 12. Plaintiff brings claims for relief as a collective action pursuant to FLSA Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of all current and former non-exempt employees (including cashiers, cooks, delivery persons, food preparers, floor persons, among others) employed by Defendants at the Eateries on or after the... | win |
177,668 | 10. Plaintiff brings the First Count as a collective action pursuant to Section 216(b) of the FLSA, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated people (the “Collective” or the “technicians”), which shall include: All persons who work or worked for Defendant as technicians from January 2, 2017 through the dat... | win |
191,444 | 19. Sales tax is a consumption tax on the purchase of goods or services assessed by some states and municipalities. 20. A retail transaction is only subject to sales tax in the taxing authority where the goods are delivered. 21. For example, when a buyer and seller reside in the same state, and the buyer takes... | lose |
206,635 | (Against All Defendants for Violation of Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and 17 C.F.R. § 244.100 Promulgated Thereunder) (Against the Individual Defendants for Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act) (Against all Defendants for Violations of Section 14(d)(4) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 14d-9,17 ... | lose |
422,106 | 29. Within the four years preceding the filing of this action, Adams Toyota and/or its agents utilized an ATDS to send text messages to the wireless telephone numbers of Plaintiff and the putative class members. 30. Specifically, the hardware and software used by Adams Toyota and/or its agents has the capacity ... | lose |
52,516 | 13. Between in or about November 2018 and the present, Defendant transmitted or caused to be transmitted, by itself or through an intermediary or intermediaries, numerous SMS text message advertisements to the 5236 Number without Plaintiff’s prior express written consent, including without limitation the messages d... | lose |
171,372 | 10. Defendant also called Plaintiff on June 10, 2015 at 12:25p.m. on her cellular telephone. 11. Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system”, as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its daily calls to Plaintiff seeking to collect the debt allegedly owed 12. Defendant’s calls constituted calls... | win |
191,343 | 13. Plaintiff brings claims for relief as a collective action pursuant to FLSA Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of all current and former non-exempt employees (including but not limited to waiters, busboys, runners, servers, food preparers, cooks, line-cooks, bartenders and bar- backs) employed by Defenda... | win |
244,799 | (Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii)) 133. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by reference the above paragraphs as though set forth fully herein. 134. The foregoing acts and omissions of Defendants constitute numerous and multiple knowing and/or willful, violations of th... | win |
378,749 | 11. Plaintiff Tiffanie Branch applied for a position as Liability Claims Representative at the Fredericksburg office of Defendant GEICO during the late summer of 2016. On August 26, 2016, she accepted GEICO’s offer to join the company as a Liability Claims Representative at an initial salary of $22.33 an hour. 1... | lose |
316,815 | 21. Defendant is a sports merchandise company that owns and operates the website, www.rocketsshop.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. 22. Defendant’... | win |
283,415 | 23. The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Throughout the Class Period, AgFeed common stock was actively traded on the NASDAQ. While the exact number of Class members is unknown to Plaintiffs at this time and can only be ascertained through appropriate discovery, Pl... | lose |
37,587 | 34. EOS placed EOS Lip Balm products, including Blackberry Nectar, Coconut Milk, Strawberry Sorbet, Blueberry Acai, Pomegranate Raspberry, Summer Fruit, Sweet Mint, Honeysuckle Honeydew, Lemon Drop, and Medicated Tangerine, into the stream of commerce. 35. EOS has promoted the use of its Visibly Soft Lip Balm ... | win |
405,346 | EMPLOYEES AT THE OVERTIME PREMIUM RATE During times relevant to this action, Tipped Employees worked in excess of 40 hours per week. Defendants failed, however, to pay Tipped Employees for all hours worked, including those in excess of 40 per week. Defendants failed to compensate Tipped Employees for hours in exce... | win |
206,009 | (Failure to pay overtime) (Federal) (on Behalf of the FLSA Class & New York Class) 8 (Failure to provide wage notices) (NY STATE) (On behalf of the FLSA Class & New York Class) (Failure to pay wages) NY Lab. Law §191 (On behalf of the FLSA Class & New York Class) 9 (Failure to pay overtime) (NY STAT... | lose |
356,348 | 11. At all times relevant, plaintiff IRestore was a corporation within the State of Florida. IRestore is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). 12. Plaintiff created a Yelp Business profile in or around 2013. 14. Plaintiff has never provided express written consen... | lose |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.