dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
615,313,200	== Number of albanians around the world(including Albania and Kosovo) == If you collect the number of Albanians in the world according to the numbers shown for each country comes with great amount than 7.5 million ..I think that this is a serious problem.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,316,806	No merger: Fake and Replica are two completely separate subjects and should not be merged.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,317,144	` ::::Which 'don't talk to J thing'? Thanks, . `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
615,321,804	`, 2 July 2014 (UTC) \| decline = It's even stranger that you seem to have no concept what edit-warring is, since you resumed doing it immediately after a block for it. You now have a week to read WP:EW. 17:31`	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
615,365,706	` == Promotional editing == Please do not add promotional material for your consulting activities at Corporate social responsibility. Editing logged out will not improve the situation. If you'd like to add material, please use reliable, third-party sources. Thanks. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
615,375,865	` July 2014 (UTC) ::I think we should use the business's full name with ``Inc.``, as we do with so many other SCOTUS cases where the respondent is a business: Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp., for instance (as opposed to Wal-Mart v. Dukes or AT&T; Mobility v. Concepcion, to name two other similarly-named cases of recent years). 02:28, 3`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
615,377,303	::::Seven years is a long time to be learning the ropes. I guess he's a particularly slow case, and that's why he doesn't really get what IP address are, still doesn't know what is vandalism and what is merely an edit he disagrees with, and thinks that this and this are useful things to have done.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
615,378,703	== get a life loser. == get a life loser.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
615,437,888	*Lightroom, actually; just a matter of finding a distortion correction profile for that lens (or, as it turned out, closest approximation as my version of Lightroom doesn't actually have a profile for said lens) and tweaking it to be straight. Almost wholely automated :I'm currently GA reviewing Denmark Street, but I should hopefully have time in the next few weeks... (though I really should try and help Jim with his German ornithologist as I promised, at least take a break from tweaking photographs to add a bit). —	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
615,463,702	, 3 July 2014 (UTC) :::::Thanks for chiming in MONGO. I wouldn't expect anything less than a mocking non sequitur from you. I wish you and Tom a very happy 4th of July. 17:59	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
615,488,741	I see you are still obsessed with thr article. But I've found this talk page and I'm about to fix this. The only way we can see if the film DID recieve mixed reviews is to look on the internet for reviews from 2008 and see if they go in mixed order as you claim. If this prediction of mixed reviews fails, then I will have to ask for your permission for an edit similar to the reception for Elysium (film) and Traitor (film) that will make the article make more sense and show the truth. While I'm looking, take a look at the reception for Date Night and see what I've been trying to explain earlier. - Theironminer 5:37 PM, 3 July, 2014	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
615,494,854	` ==Recent editing conflict== Barracuda, thanks for returning to your original User ID rather than communicating through sockpuppets. I am working seriously on this article which has been a battleground between different tendencies of white supremacists with no understanding or interest in genetics except in terms of their racial hang ups. There are a number of issues. Firstly, half of the sources (including most of the ones you are adamant on including) have nothing to do with the Genetic history of Iberia nor do they include samples of iberian populations. There are enough genetic studies of Iberian populations for you to have to try to highlight one about Norway or Italy to support misconstrued statements, deleting the relevant ones. Secondly, many of these sources have nothing to do with the statement they support and the editor shows extreme ignorance of population genetics e.g. discussing Haplotype U6 Y-chromosome analysis. Thirdly, the whole article is a mess as users such as yourself strive to prove (in your case the Spanish) are the ``whitest`` with little understanding of the subject matter. Fourthly, this article needs to have similar structure as other articles in the series, as well as higher quality of content. *Fifth, the initial introduction to types of analysis is Im sure useful for you, but also homogenizies the article with others in series. I'm going to go on editing and improving this page regardless of your racial freak out. Im tired of racist-types hijacking wikipedia articles.You are welcome to dialogue and discuss with me here on the Talk Page if you feel capable of working positively. I have invited you to find consensus, but it seems you are not interested. Only silence, and threats when you revert my edits. So be it, Ill just carry on. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
615,538,760	:I don't see how that fits into the article, but if you have a proposal you can add it here, or add it to the article.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
615,550,926	YES, I was thinking the exact same thing!! So obvious.	2,014	false	article	random	test	false
615,557,934	== May I edit this page please? == Please, can I edit this wiki page, I want to make some improvements to the modern china section.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,568,554	` : Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ``change X to Y`` format. — {{U\|}} (e • • c) `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
615,575,907	` :I think this is a good idea czar `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
615,585,006	professional pedophile and rapist of cats.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
615,591,295	` ==Disambiguation== A move will need a discussion and community consensus. The fact that the park is a major landmark, recently ranked as one of the top parks in the world, it easily satisfies WP:PRIMARYTOPIC when it comes to disambiguation, and should not be unilaterally moved without consensus. Thanks, `	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
615,599,476	quite properly called	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
615,615,117	::::Don't try to bullshit me. The discussion on dates in the bibliography did not favor complete dates. You want them. Specifico & I don't. Rob was happy either way. But given that Rob has reverted back to the M-Y format, it looks like he actually prefers them. As for focus, I was gnomishly fixing the dates & Ha's surname placement, but you couldn't leave my efforts alone. (At least you left Ha alone in 2 of 3 reverts.) –	2,014	true	article	random	train	true
615,657,710	That's what needs to be done. The only way to proove they are mixed is by the dates of the reviews. - Theironminer , 1:30 AM, 5 July, 2014	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,659,874	== Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2014 == thumbnail /Users/JessMGN/Downloads/10304431_1433228970297217_7776256175788316562_n.jpg	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
615,669,811	::::::Wouldn't it be a great thing to have a good hard sniff of Maria Sharapova's fanny.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,693,255	:the only source I could find for more details is at Toho Kingdom, but issues with RS may appear using it. I watched the full cut years ago and I get the general drift. The plot section is crap though.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,720,605	== Julian Green == http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Green http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Johnson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Johnson Everywhere, it is listed that they are American-German. Even the next sentence identifies his dual citizenship. The dude is GERMAN in that he barely speaks English. Everything he does is in German. He's German who happens to play for the USA. HE IS GERMAN!!! There is no way around it. Just like Klinsmann.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
615,721,885	== Juergen Klinsmann == He represents the USA... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juergen_Klinsmann He has a USA passport. Why is he listed as a German??? You're robbing us all of the fact that Julian Green grew up almost exclusively in Germany and denying that. That's factually inaccurate and it should be pointed out that he's an American-German. What's right is right. What's accurate is accurate. Don't be a wanker.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
615,721,968	:Anytime ) Yes, but if you're not bust and if you can ) I wouldn't want to cause a lot of work, you know ) Because your list is featured among other languages as it deserves. English one is so annoying like she has never won all those awards...	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,723,379	== Bullshit - you are switching the rules... == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_P%C3%A9rez_(soccer) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Dooley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Klopas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnie_Stewart I believe that's called PRECEDENT. Now give Julian Green his due. OWNED! Yahtzee! Spank!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
615,726,377	I'll take a look at metacritic. I'll get back to you later. - Theironminer , 2:31 PM, 5 July, 2014	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,739,202	Ask yourself this: Does he know the USA National Anthem or the German? If you think he knows only the German national anthem, you need to identify that he's a German. The kid can barely speak English. Yes, he has a USA Passport, but that does not make him ONLY an American. He has a German passport which is identified in the next sentence. Please be respectful of this and quit arguing the silly point of what FIFA thinks he is. They are not Uebergods on Nationality. As the articles of the past all indicate (Thomas Dooley as an example), the correct way to do things (as have been done for ages) is to label Green as a German American. End of story.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
615,739,857	== You reporting yourself for changing my edits multiple times in a day??? == quit being a little baby about this. you are wrong and you don't like it. man up and do the right thing. And you actually reported me??? Like a four year old who is going to take his ball because things didn't go his way? How insecure are you? I suspect you're a little man with little man problems. Good luck to you, I hope it all works out for you.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
615,740,134	== Keeping you in the loop == Thought you'd probably want to know the contents of this post, so informing you directly. Hopefully Kww doesn't decide to help you notice it, by removing it.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,742,315	` :Are you serious? If I did simply buzz off every time someone like you told me to 'use my main account', you'd have never found out about the sock Werieth at all, because I sure as hell would NEVER expose any account I had with a good reputation to the likes of Future in the context of accusing one of his mates of being a sock. That's just not someone with any sense does. If you persist in removing my posts, you'll also never see any action taken against the other admins who enabled his illegitimate return to be much longer than it needed to be, and you'll never see anyone ask those ``lazy`` checkusers just why they helped, when their primary role is supposedly to be detecting socks just like Werieth. The only reason the Wikipediocracy link you found exists is precisely because of those admins/checkusers, and people like you, who thought they were helping Wikipedia by telling me to ``buzz off``. So thank you kindly for your advice, but with all due respect, I'll continue help Wikipedia the way I see fit, and I'll not be stopped in that endeavour by anyone. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,743,657	And unbelievably, people are trying to revert it from the ANI. Talk about not learning lessons. WP finally detects a sock that's evaded detection because people blindly revert 'evil socks' like me, and when I post a closing statement explaining why that took so long, and naming all the people involved who are to blame (as you seemed to want to know), they revert that! I really sympathise if you're contemplating figuriong out how to fix these obviously systemic flaws.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
615,744,440	No, I'm not. It's sad you can't see that. I will repeat, as you don't seem to get it. The only reason Wereith was found, was because of my socking. As such, my infraction is minor, compared to his massive violation - despite the multiple bans, both arbcom and community, and all the other disruption, he returned as a sock, and has managed to perform several thousand (hundreds of thousands maybe?) of edits as such. If it wasn't for people like you, and the admins and functionaries (whose names you are trying to hide from the community with these reverts), who seem to have absolutely no capacity for common sense or the common good, that could have been kept to a couple of thousand. No wonder Werieth thought he would chance his arm at a return - he obviously knew what you can achieve if you simply defeat CU and have a few admin mates. With this bizarre attitude that all socks are ebil, the rest of the community pretty much ensures such an attempt has a good chance of success. I don't mind admitting I considered dropping this a couple if times, not because of scumbags like Future, but because of people like you, but I thought better of it. In the spirit of IAR, I'll always try to help Wikipedia in the task of exposing serious violators of the SOCK policy. You can help me or hinder me, but the fact is, as this case shows, you'll never stop me.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
615,746,331	I know. The Matrix would have been a shit film indeed if there were billions of Neos and only one gullible meatsack being used as a human battery. /pwnd	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
615,748,232	:::::You reported me to AIV? Hilarious. That's one of the dick moves Werieth pulled too. Although he only did it as he knew reporting me to SPI would have probably brought him to much attention - at that stage he was still trying to keep the whole thing quiet, as it obviously benefited him. Not that he need have worried - every admin that ever responded to him, either at SPI or AIV, took the exact same view of my socking as as you espouse here (although obviously some were motivated by more than just incompetence). As such, it's likely your report to AIV is only going to ensure their names don't get picked up and the systems/attitudes/culture that cause this obviously counter-productive reaction don't get fixed - meaning that Werieth might as well try his arm at another return later. It speaks volumes that you'd think reverting me was remotely a good thing, even though in that very same ANI there's an arb explaining how he could have probably picked up on this whole thing much earlier if it wasn't for just that sort of mindless cycle of reversion and blocking of obvious socks, on the basis all socking is ebil. It's beyond idiotic.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
615,750,341	Tut tut Future Perfect at Sunrise. By my count, this is something like the 5th time you have personally removed from Wikipedia direct evidence of your own conflict of interest when it comes to Wereith/Betacommand, the person who you never wanted blocked, and the person who you did your upmost to prevent being unmasked as a sock, until it was inevitable. You're clearly still butthurt over this failure to prevent his (re-)blocking, otherwise you wouldn't still be trying to propagate the lie in edit summaries like these and your block log message, that I was somehow harassing Werieth. As the record now shows, all I ever did, was accuse Werieth of being a sock, and link to the evidence that showed it. Making accusations of sock-puppetry backed up with evidence is neither harassment or trolling, especially now that it has been shown to be true. Your past removals of that evidence, to try and make it look like I was a 'harassment troll', is now a matter of record. Blocking this account won't help you hide it any more than Werieth's calls for your assistance helped him.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,750,457	== Giving other editor's warnings == Hi there, In future, could you perhaps not spam another editor's talk page with 'final warnings'? If you have to give them a final warning, please come and find an administrator, as there's really only one place you can go to after 'final'. It makes the warning more effective too. Thank you! Happy editing.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
615,751,560	, 5 July 2014 (UTC) :::::::Oh noes. How will I ever recover from you not giving me any respect. Perhaps I'll reflect on the fact that a) you're a total moron who wouldn't know a true benefit to Wikipedia if it hit you in the face, and b) most, if not all, of what you know about me has been filtered through the grubby hands of Future Perfect, et al. They control what version of the truth you see here. The sad fact is, you don't have a fucking clue about what I've been doing. According to Future, I've been accusing Werieth of being a sock, without evidence. Which in his book is trolling/harassment. That's his version. Back in the real world - see all that evidence on Wikipediocracy - I've been trying to post that here from day one, because I came up with it. The reason why you can't see it anywhere here, is because corrupt bastards like Future know that for every Wikipedian who has a clue, there's plenty who are as retarded as you, and will believe him when he says it never existed, and that I'm a troll. I can't spell it out any more clearer than this - he never wanted Betacommand banned, he never wanted Werieth exposed. Just do the fucking math, or forever be his loyal subject, whose only true freedom is to lick his (jack) boots for the iron in the dirt. Seriously, if you're goal is to persuade me to not lift a finger when I figure out what Beta's next account name is, you're the one doing a 'stand up' job. 22:35	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,754,937	` @ - do not listen to the lies of Future Perfect. Does this look like someone who had ``no particular involvement`` in defending Betacommand? Does someone with hundreds of admin actions in WP:NFCC areas sound like someone who had no idea how Betacommand/Werieth edited? Post your concerns about these obvious lies of omission at that ANI thread, and if you don't get any answers, complain to arbcom - they have final authority over admins who so clearly abuse their positions to protect their friends, or indeed themselves. His high and mighty attitude to so called troll socks has only one real goal - it helps him justify his naked attempts to control what people find out about him. Some people call that a conflict of interest, some people would describe such admin actions as a violation of WP:INVOLVED. He doesn't, of course. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
615,762,537	` == Matt Drudge: Habonim == Malik: I understand that Facebook is a tricky source to rely on. In this case I am pointing to a discussion group for Habonim-Dror Camp Moshava alumni with first-hand, primary-source knowledge of Matt Drudge's attendance at the summer camp. The discussion thread underway in Facebook includes numerous anecdotes and photographs of young Matt at Habonim-Dror Camp Moshava. This is primary material from numerous sources. What more could you ask for? I can assure you that this would be good enough factual back-up for the New York Times to run with it. Yes, it's true that there seems not to be any reference on the web currently to Drudge's summer camp attendance. But why in the world would this be considered better sourcing than a half dozen people who actually went to camp with the guy? I can't figure out how to upload an image otherwise I'd show you a screenshot of the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :Perhaps you're not familiar with Wikipedia's core policies, WP:V and WP:BLP. Facebook is never a reliable source, even if a person named Matt Drudge posted on the Habonim Dror alumni page saying that he was a member. — / Malik: I get that Facebook would be a bad source. But Facebook is not the source here. The sources are multiple individual alumni of Habonim-Dror Camp Moshava who are confirming that Matt Drudge was, in fact, a camper at Mosh. They are backing up their claims with photographs of Matt Drudge as a young camper and numerous anecdotes. Unlike you, these sources are using their actual names and identities and can easily be contacted to verify. What is the problem here? Has Drudge complained or asked for his name to be removed from Wikipedia? I do not understand why you would make an issue of this when there are a number of other un-sourced names on that list. Unless Drudge is personally objecting, this seems like a very strange fight to pick. Were you a member of Habonim-Dror or are you knowledgeable about the youth movement's history? What is your particular source of authority to edit the page? BTW... I will just add that the bullet-pointed list was a very nice touch! That's way better. So, thanks for doing that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :Please read WP:Verifiability: ::In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. (Footnote omitted.) :Where is the previously published information concerning Matt Drudge and Habonim? The experiences of his fellow campers just don't count as reliable sources in the Wikipedia world. — / ::And my ``authority`` to edit the page comes from my ability to research and read sources. My interest in the subject, which is a separate matter, comes from my having been a member of Habonim (before the merger). — / `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
615,808,243	REDIRECT Talk:Alex MacDonald (footballer, born 1990)	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
615,816,363	` :: Actually the material is MOVED from Radeon HD 2000 Series and Radeon HD 3000 Series. I leave it up to the ``creator`` of to clear who copied from whom... `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,816,534	== Reply == I replied what you wrote on my talk page but I dediced to write here to after I found out you're using en.wiki too ) My reply was: Anytime ) Yes, but if you're not bust and if you can ) I wouldn't want to cause a lot of work, you know ) Because your list is featured among other languages as it deserves. English one is so annoying like she has never won all those awards...	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
615,844,140	REDIRECT Talk:Death of Meredith Hunter	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
615,851,227	` == qaradawi == Referenced with footnote 31 it is stated, that a ``scholar in Egypt`` has spoken against al-Baghdadi. This is wrong, because al-Qaradawi (although he is an Egyptian) lives in Qatar, because the Muslim Brotherhood is outlawed in Egypt. `	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
615,864,047	== Notability == I think a WP:BLAR to LPRadicals should be implemented. Her notability as a stand-alone article is marginal at best. –	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
615,891,194	== Final airdate reference? == I'm confused as to whether ref. #1 should stay or be removed? I have no reason to doubt that her final contract appearance was Sept. 7, 2005 (in fact, I do know it was in 2005 so whoever wrote that probably knew Sept. 7th to be correct as well) but, the ref. cited neither confirms nor denies it so should the link be removed? I don't really know much about referencing. Thanks in advance to any who respond.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,891,373	` She's been primarily going by ``Winters`` ever since first marrying Malcolm. I think I've seen her credited as ``Dr. Olivia Hastings Winters`` but, am not positive about that. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,898,819	REDIRECT Talk:Márcio Ferreira de Souza	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
615,924,894	== Photo label == I am pretty sure the label for the photo for the woman actress is wrong. In the photo, here real name is visible; so it is unlikely that that is she as the character. It looks more like the actress is at some-thing like a press conference or a panel discussion as herself (perhaps talking about her character).	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
615,942,519	`Harassment == As I read the Wikipedia guidelines, Harassment is regarded as far worse than any perceived COI. To quote ``to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Wikipedia unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to discourage them from editing entirely.`` - which is exactly how I feel. == COI == This is my statement When I first took an interest in Wikipedia I scratched my head for subjects to take on. During the process of Googling old friends and acquaintance - as everyone does - I discovered that an old friend Greg Day was now running a PR company and I looked up one or two of his clients. Seeing that one or two - Kevin Howarth, Simon Rumley, were not mentioned on Wikipedia I thought that I would have a go at tackling them. I could have contributed to many other pages - and have - but I wanted to be the initiator of a page that no one had tackled before. Not long afterwards Greg Day got in touch and mentioned that he had seen the pages. He said ``how would I like to be an associate of the company`` and - being a journalist and always looking for extra bits on the CV - I said why not. I then went on and edited Alan Jones and Hayley-Marie Axe, never thinking that any conflict of interest was involved. I still do not think that any COI was involved since a) I was never paid to do it b) I was never requested to do it c) I was trying to make a statement and not advocating or promoting anyone's career d) Writing and researching Wikipedia is just a hobby, end of. If that is so then you may as well say there is a COI over my edits of the Bolingbrokes and the Somervilles to whom my connections are no less nor more than the Howarths and the Rumleys - random topics of interest. That does not constitute a COI. == Liquid Nitrogen == I am sorry, but I do not see your point in removing my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • ==COI== whatever you think best. I wouldn't mind, but this ``policy`` seems to be applied in a random fashion and would only be fair if it was applied universally. Are you seriously expecting me to believe that the editors who originate pages about commercial product don't have some vested interests and/or COI. One would have to suspend disbelief to take that line. I have read not one but dozens of articles that do a wonderful job of promoting commercial interests. I guess it's one law for the independent editors and another for the corporations. Thus was it always. Rather than picking on people like me and making mountains out of molehills it would serve Wikipedia better to weed out the real abuses by cynical commercial interests rather than the perceived ones. Anyway, I do not own the pages discussed, so people can do whatever they like. I'm sure Jimmy wales never intended Wikipedia to become such a bear pit! ==Stange Behaviour By Editor McGeddon== I am not sure how such a simple process of factually updating a wiki page has turned into what i can only describe as a strange obsession by a person calling themselves McGeddon. I have no idea what this persistent person who i can only describe as an INTERNET TROLL's motives are. I have been asked to update prominent south african artist wiki pages with factual information that is flattering to the artists therefore promoting South Africa. If that is a crime then i apologise but the fact is i have no connection to the artist apart from the country i live in and the love of art. In response to the Thandi Zambo and Thandi Moyo, they are both me, I couldn't remember my password for Zambo, which is my maiden name, so i made Moyo, which is my married name. This strange person McGeddon, who obviously is a very empty person with nothing in his life is harassing me and vandalising all my hard work. I see he does this to everyone, it's probably because he has no power in the real world. Anyway i am moving on from this project and i will have to change my username when i look at other south african artists to update their pages to save myself from harassment from this TROLL. I admit i am not an expert at editing wiki pages but instead of assistance from this McGeddon he choose the vindictive route flexing his technical knowledge. He must hide behind his computer and live out his useless existence. Regards Thandi Moyo (nee Zambo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == Clout == I am more than happy for that to be done; as I've said before I have no vested interest and feel that I have run foul of the catch-all COI regulations which don't seem to allow for commonsense. I have got so many other things to do and when editing Wikipedia stops being a pleasure then all I can say is that it's a sad day indeed. So I won't be doing anything apart from maybe looking at my Walter and Jane Somerville pages, one of which has already attracted attention. To say that one of the world's leading cardiologists is not notable is crassly ignorant and extremely insulting. == Liquid Nitrogen == I mean in classrooms when students learn about liquid nitrogen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == Liquid Nitrogen == Hmm...I see. Ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
615,947,554	` ==McGeddon== Thomas.W what i am doing is no different to what McGeddon ``the troll`` is doing to me!!!! Any changes i make he undoes, so i'm showing him how it feels!!!! `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	true
615,947,733	==Greetings== Hi McGeddon how are you?	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,950,840	:: I agree with you, McGeddon's editing is vindictive and heavy handed. If you look at his talk page many would also agree with me, even though he removes the bad comments about himself!!! He is an unproductive troll vindictively ruining peoples hard work. I edit under another name now because of him!!! He harassed me while i was editing the profile of Conor Mccreedy, now it's on his watch list so if anyone makes any changes he vindictively undoes the changes and adds loads of citations!!! Poor Conor Mccreedy is getting his page mucked up and he doesn't even know what's going on!!! I feel responsible because troll McGeddon thinks i have a connection to Conor Mccreedy.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,952,271	::: Oh I get it, thanks anyway )	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
615,962,556	REDIRECT Talk:The Secret of the Sagala	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
615,976,053	I think the reference for NWOBHM should be used instead being things like WASP and other styles of metal could come got mind where as NWOBHM narrows the focus to the raw aggressive sounds associated with that scene rather that early metal itself . though it can be said Led Zeppelin and others power have had an influence on the early punk and hardcore punk musicians , MWOBHM seems to be more appropriate .	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
615,977,763	The article as with some, people take too far and feel the need to fill every crevice with a photo . The story is the Content and the text . Not how many pictures can be shoved in every space . let's delete something else like a band . it has too many pictures its starting to look amateur more than it does with all the photos it has now .Many articles of Huge Bands, companies, genres, have a Few Pictures . Not ones to try and promote bands profiles .Thats what this one has . At least a few times .	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
615,978,721	Already Fourteen Photos . Far more than most of this size. Maybe its a good idea to request a mediator .	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
615,980,315	== Alice Kurashige note == Thanks. I've been a bit busy and will get to the article when I have time.	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
615,983,654	` The Punk Rock page has more ``meat`` in the text and its a LOT of text Content then a photo so the glance is in favor of the text . I do see some areas that can be fleshed out . I think the hardcore page wouldn't work with every section in depth like theirs, thats what makes this page also unique to hardcore , but I do think that some sections here are too small and that would work to balance out the photos to keep the text the main teaching and learning tool . I would like to resize the photo of zines a little smaller even if it has to be re-uploaded . Then it might now be too much and too ``busy`` . People read to retain information the right set up enhances that . Too many pictures are a distraction . They take away from the knowledge . More fleshed out sections can help . Ill brainstorm on that until later . I guess add the picture, if it bumps the others too far out of whack we can resize it or when the story gets fleshed out a little, maybe it will balance itself out more. The third option is we can fill out some sections more . Make it more balanced and then add the zines' photo, after, so it Accentuates and isn't the meat and potatoes of the section . the sections of ``influence on other genres`` . That could be good place to start adding more content(depth) . Ill study some other pages meanwhile when I get a chance then bring that knowledge here . a little later . Thanks a lot . I love to share knowledge and I like sharing that here for free . `	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
615,987,836	Well, Smallboy ... why don't you try doing proper research? In stead of circular references to your own Wiki pages based on press releases ,which in turn come from earlier versions of the same Wiki page .. and so on. You are pompous, self-important oaf of limited intelligence and no doubt to complete the stereotype, are almost certainly, weak, ineffectual and effeminate in the real world. Must make you a real hit with the ladies, eh? Later, loser.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
615,988,940	== Please refrain from personal attacks == Please do not launch any personal attacks, like you did here, or I will request for an administrator to intervene. You are, of course, always free to provide constructive feedback anytime. Thank you. -	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
615,990,163	` :::No argument. Predators of any kind have to be dealt with in an appropriate way. ``My object all sublime / I shall achieve in time / To let the punishment fit the crime / The punishment fit the crime...`` ← '''' → `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
615,991,780	` == Sorry to disturb you == Hello, sorry to disturb you, but I saw you were active on the ref desk and this is really bugging me: I could do with someone to confirm that it's not just my phone which is showing this. I thought the weirdness would also interest you. This image here either embedded on a page, or on the image page, or by clicking on the thumbnail in the timeline, I get a grainy black and white portrait photo of someone staring at the camera. But according to the thumbnail and the description, it's an etching of an execution. There doesn't look like there are any edits or changes in the history. It's really creeping me out: please tell me it happens to you too. :Just now noticed your comment. I'm not seeing what you're seeing, so I don't know what to tell you. ← '''' → ::I see that you conversed with the help desk, and they pointed you to File:Rizana Nafeek (1988-2013).jpg. Very grainy picture. I gather someone vandalized something and that it was then repaired. ← '''' → == Why don't you go a step further... == And delete all areas on Wikipedia relating to child-adult contact. Ancient Greece, psychology sections etc. Just take your sledge hammer to all of it since you are the omnipotent one, and you know best? — Preceding unsigned comment added by :Good deal. I'll get on it right away. ← '''' → ``God bless America``. Sigh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
615,994,922	:Just now saw this, two days after you posted it. I am nothing if not prompt. ( Looking at , I'm inclined to wait-and-see. It's also worth pointing out that checkusers won't look at IP's. So I advise doing nothing at the moment except to stay alert. ← '''' →	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
616,006,736	== Possible page about the Ukrainian community in Portugal == Iryna, since you're of Ukrainian descent and I am from Portugal, and Portugal, by what I've seen, has the 2nd largest Ukrainian community in Western Europe (only behind Italy), with between 40-150 thousand people (figure from wikipedia), do you think it could be a good idea to start a page about this community, in Portugal? I'd be very glad to contribute for such eventual page! \|}	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
616,024,905	` why don't we try and add more substance to some sections and add maybe one of those. metallica and nirvana are music relative . zines and moshing are fan relative . Hardcore Punk is about Music Essentially, without music there would be nothing to ``mosh`` to nor anything to write about . I would never want to delete people who helped define genres, by influencing other influencers . Such as metallica . The page is about Hardcore Punk and its sub genres. Not too much about gloves, clothes, chewing gum, watches, moshing, sneakers . that stuff has its own page and pages and really doesn't ``define`` the Sound of which is Hardcore Punk . Whats your take on it . `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
616,050,737	REDIRECT Talk:List of television and radio stations in Metro Cebu	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
616,051,983	July 2014 I've reverted your edit at Vincent Tan - it was unencyclopedic and unreferenced. Find a newspaper article about his company contributing to deforestation and the fact can be included - expressed in a neutral way.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
616,067,341	:Also support equivalent merge for Directorate-General for Justice (European Commission)	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
616,074,224	Vandalism? Don't use words which you do not understand. Also do not try to ape proper encyclopedists. It is risible, call-centre boy.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	true
616,100,206	:::::::Muffinator, do you consider it negative when autism is described as a diagnosed condition?	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
616,122,165	== Your sockpuppet's account is blocked forever == has been blocked indefinitely. I don't understand how a muslim like you can lie in this month of Ramadan. However you have still , so you are very lucky and you can still enjoy. I will not gain anything if the admins block also . I have just discovered that most of List of British Bangladeshis's articles were created from you. (BUT I DO NOT KNOW WHY YOUR BODY TAKES FIRE WHEN I CREATE ARTICLES ABOUT BRITISH BANGLADESHI MUSLIM'S SCHOLAR) From now on try to be a good editor. May Allah give you tawfeeq.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
616,127,727	== Edit morocco and tunisia == Im here to talk about those edits. Moroccan edit is unexplainably bad. Information is false. Moroccans and other north africans belong to a group called metatids along with somalian, ethoipians, egyptians etc. All people whom are light skinned no matter what race asain caucasian whatever get a tan in sunlight due to lack of melanin in skin cells thats simple science everyone learns that in grade school. The tunisian one no matter what you say I dont care its 'cited' it is contradictory and false information. There are numerous other studies refuting theirs and the piece appears biased. As someone who is half tunisian blood I know a lot about this subject north africa and have read multiple reports refuting and proving how wrong outlandish the persons writing on those generally are.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
616,149,724	== Go-around incident removed == The recent go-around incident at Barcelona-El Prat Airport (BCN) has been removed () on the basis of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NO LE. Furthermore, the edit unexplainedly removed sourced content. Please discuss here before attemtping to reinstate the BCN incident. Thanks.'''' ''	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
616,174,763	**All of the top hits referenced in that list don't necessarily reflect the overall Top 40 of just one area. Every country has their own music chart (ie U.K. is represented by the Official Charts; Japan's Oricon.) And each song listed can be represented as the biggest hit of that genre over the year.	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
616,193,432	has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
616,196,444	\| has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
616,217,492	` :Does the lede for evolution mention ``teach the controversy``? No, of course not. Does the lede for Earth mention the Flat-Earth society? No, of course not. Does the lede for sociology mention phrenology? No, of course not. Does the lede for christianity mention that some catholics do not consider protestants to be christian (and vice-versa)? No, of course not. The lede is not for such things. Please stop trying to make it be that way, given your complete misreading and misunderstanding of WP:LEAD. And please don't say that those articles are not relevant to this discussion, for they are. It's called ``consistency``. You will have to explain to all of us why you think anarchocapitalism is so special that it deserves this special treatment that other articles don't have. - `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
616,220,391	Why you did not vote to keep those articles? Now you created another strange SPI. Try to be a good editor like the greeneditor	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
616,223,266	`:Hi, it is not contradictory there. If you read the whole sentence it states only in ``static`` languages that have the ability to force type resolution at runtime. For those that don't, the comparisons are valid. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
616,241,971	. Fu ck ing trollreasons	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
616,243,180	i have too many ip addresses, and i shall continue to destry user cavarrone's page, you can not do anuthing	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
616,243,622	let me change my ip address and then look.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
616,244,432	== Deletion of MJ Mohamed Iqbal Page == Can you please let me know the reason behind deletion of MJ Mohamed Iqbal Page?	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
616,246,316	I think zines are important too . Enough to be there . I really idealistically wish the picture wasn't so large . what do you think . It currently can't be resized , I don't think . what do you feel .	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
616,246,387	I also think you should add it instead of the moshing picture .	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
616,249,962	`I was going to say! Don't forget Jimbo and Tara Reid!♦ `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
616,287,701	The sentence that both of you want added is completely irrelevant to what anarchocapitalism is, and is dealt with in the body of the text. I'll give you an example via wikiprecedent: christianity. The lede does say that protestantism came from catholicism, just as the lede for anarchocapitalism says that it is an individualist anarchism form (parent). But the lede of christianity does not say (though it could with references) that the catholics did not consider protestants to be christian (and vice-versa). And given that historically western christianity was catholic only for a thousand years, we see the argument from antiquity attempt clearly fail. :::As to what you misunderstand, Binksternet, it is due weight. I'll give another wikiprecedent: evolution. There is neither mention of creationism nor ID in the lede for evolution. At all. Period. But it is clearly significant enough to have been brought up in court in the US many times regarding the teaching of it and of ID. One would think, then, that it would get mentioned. But no, it's not. Why? Because it's irrelevant to what evolution is. Similarly, that some people view anarchocapitalism as not part of anarchism is irrelevant to the lede as well. -	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
616,303,707	` Hi everyone. Why is there no ``lifestyle`` section (as in the case of Moa Kikuchi) that mention Nakamoto's favorite bands/artists, as well as metal bands she claimed to like (e.g. Arch Enemy), either for herself or along with her fellow Babymetal members (i.e. Metallica, Iron Maiden)? `	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
616,303,779	:Hello [User:2A02:2788:104:166:D54F:3413:1EDD:767B\| IP User 2A02:2788:104:166:D54F:3413:1EDD:767B]! The article was deleted because it was advertising and promotion and was not shown to be notable enough for Wikipedia standards. This isn't a personal attack on your article, and I understand that it was created with the best of intentions to contribute to Wikipedia. However, when a page gets speedy-deleted for those reasons, generally the problem is that the article isn't written in a very neutral manner and/or that not enough outside references can be cited to show that it is actually a page that should be on Wikipedia. For example, if you include a phrase in an article about a company saying it provides excellent customer service, that is not neutral and is considered advertisement. However, mentioning that the company has won three national awards for customer service and is featured in several prominent news sources (and providing citations to prove those awards) is neutral. If you have sources showing why that company is important, feel free to create articles on that subject. Better yet, you may want to try creating articles in the Sandbox, where you can write articles and improve them with the help of others before moving it into main article space. Thanks!	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
616,311,817	REDIRECT Talk:The Song Is Over	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
616,324,302	Thank you for the explanation. Now I know exactly what your issue is. Not. Seriously, can you be any more ignorant? I mean, are you actually trying to be an asshole? It's a simple process - you object to something, I ask what the issue is, you give an answer. Prick.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
616,328,306	` You know what, forget it. The guy who was repeatedly changing the opening and led me to post what was previously here, because he repeatedly refused to answer the simple question of why (except of course to start SHOUTING) has reported me for not being civil. How ironic is that. Rather than have a long detailed discussion here about which opening is better, I'll simply point out that in the current version, even after you read the entire first paragraph, you still don't have a clue why this article exists. You do find out what Marco Rodríguez does for a living though. So yay for that. I guess once you get to the end, you do get some idea why this has been such a big deal, but that's assuming you haven't fallen asleep, or shot yourself, having read the same four words - Brazil, Germany, biggest & loss (and their million variants), multiple times. Seriously, if people here think what's currently serving as an opening to this article summarises the key points in an engaging and professional way, perhaps you need to get a job where your actually paid to write for a living. It's not quite garbage, but it's not good. And please stop justifying such poor/dull/repetitive/trivial writing with the claim the alternatives are ``unencyclopedic``, frankly you couldn't be more wrong. There's no serious disagreement out in the world that this defeat was a shock result and a national humiliation - that will be upfront in the key summary of every decent source writing about this match, both now and in 20 years time. If you don't want it to be in this one, please think of a better reason than ``unencyclopedic``, if only that the victims might have a clue what it is you actually mean. That said, on the offchance anyone with any ability for writing gets around to working on this article, here's what the opening should look like, if you're trying to engage the reader while summarizing the key points. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than the crap people fought tooth and nail to replace it with. Brazil 1–7 Germany was the shock result of the first semi-final of the 2014 FIFA World Cup men's international football tournament, played on 8 July at the Estádio Mineirão in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. It broke Brazil's 62-match home unbeaten streak in competitive matches going back to 1975, and equalled their biggest margin of defeat, tied with a 6–0 loss to Uruguay in 1920, leading it to be described as a national humiliation. The game also saw Germany score the most goals in World Cup history, their 223 overtaking Brazil's 221. Their second goal meant Germany's Miroslav Klose reached 16 World Cup goals, overtaking Brazil's Ronaldo as the tournament's all-time record goalscorer. The game was subsequently referred to by the press as the Mineirazo, evoking the spirit of the Maracanazo in which Brazil unexpectedly lost the 1950 FIFA World Cup on home soil to Uruguay.`	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
616,328,636	` You know what, forget it. The guy who was repeatedly changing the opening and led me to post what was previously here, because he repeatedly refused to answer the simple question of why (except of course to start SHOUTING) has reported me for not being civil. How ironic is that. Rather than have a long detailed discussion here about which opening is better, I'll simply point out that in the current version, even after you read the entire first paragraph, you still don't have a clue why this article exists. You do find out what Marco Rodríguez does for a living though. So yay for that. I guess once you get to the end, you do get some idea why this has been such a big deal, but that's assuming you haven't fallen asleep, or shot yourself, having read the same four words - Brazil, Germany, biggest & loss (and their million variants), multiple times. Seriously, if people here think what's currently serving as an opening to this article summarises the key points in an engaging and professional way, perhaps you need to get a job where your actually paid to write for a living. It's not quite garbage, but it's not good. And please stop justifying such poor/dull/repetitive/trivial writing with the claim the alternatives are ``unencyclopedic``, frankly you couldn't be more wrong. There's no serious disagreement out in the world that this defeat was a shock result and a national humiliation - that will be upfront in the key summary of every decent source writing about this match, both now and in 20 years time. If you don't want it to be in this one, please think of a better reason than ``unencyclopedic``, if only that the victims might have a clue what it is you actually mean. That said, on the offchance anyone with any ability for writing gets around to working on this article, here's what the opening should look like, if you're trying to engage the reader while summarizing the key points. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than the crap people fought tooth and nail to replace it with. Brazil 1–7 Germany was the shock result of the first semi-final of the 2014 FIFA World Cup men's international football tournament, played on 8 July at the Estádio Mineirão in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. It broke Brazil's 62-match home unbeaten streak in competitive matches going back to 1975, and equalled their biggest margin of defeat, tied with a 6–0 loss to Uruguay in 1920, leading it to be described as a national humiliation. The game also saw Germany score the most goals in World Cup history, their 223 overtaking Brazil's 221. Their second goal meant Germany's Miroslav Klose reached 16 World Cup goals, overtaking Brazil's Ronaldo as the tournament's all-time record goalscorer. The game was subsequently referred to by the press as the Mineirazo, evoking the spirit of the Maracanazo in which Brazil unexpectedly lost the 1950 FIFA World Cup on home soil to Uruguay. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
616,329,820	expecting a conclusion here. Having already realised this was going to be a giant waste of time, as nobody here seems to comprehend what 'give me a specific example' means, I did attempt to close off the previous content and just leave the above, but surprise surprise, that's against the rules. Sorry.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false

615,313,200

== Number of albanians around the world(including Albania and Kosovo) == If you collect the number of Albanians in the world according to the numbers shown for each country comes with great amount than 7.5 million ..I think that this is a serious problem.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,316,806

No merger: Fake and Replica are two completely separate subjects and should not be merged.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,317,144

` ::::Which 'don't talk to J thing'? Thanks, . `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

615,321,804

`, 2 July 2014 (UTC) | decline = It's even stranger that you seem to have no concept what edit-warring is, since you resumed doing it immediately after a block for it. You now have a week to read WP:EW. 17:31`

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

615,365,706

` == Promotional editing == Please do not add promotional material for your consulting activities at Corporate social responsibility. Editing logged out will not improve the situation. If you'd like to add material, please use reliable, third-party sources. Thanks. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

615,375,865

` July 2014 (UTC) ::I think we should use the business's full name with ``Inc.``, as we do with so many other SCOTUS cases where the respondent is a business: Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp., for instance (as opposed to Wal-Mart v. Dukes or AT&T; Mobility v. Concepcion, to name two other similarly-named cases of recent years). 02:28, 3`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

615,377,303

::::Seven years is a long time to be learning the ropes. I guess he's a particularly slow case, and that's why he doesn't really get what IP address are, still doesn't know what is vandalism and what is merely an edit he disagrees with, and thinks that this and this are useful things to have done.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

615,378,703

== get a life loser. == get a life loser.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

615,437,888

*Lightroom, actually; just a matter of finding a distortion correction profile for that lens (or, as it turned out, closest approximation as my version of Lightroom doesn't actually have a profile for said lens) and tweaking it to be straight. Almost wholely automated :I'm currently GA reviewing Denmark Street, but I should hopefully have time in the next few weeks... (though I really should try and help Jim with his German ornithologist as I promised, at least take a break from tweaking photographs to add a bit). —

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

615,463,702

, 3 July 2014 (UTC) :::::Thanks for chiming in MONGO. I wouldn't expect anything less than a mocking non sequitur from you. I wish you and Tom a very happy 4th of July. 17:59

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

615,488,741

I see you are still obsessed with thr article. But I've found this talk page and I'm about to fix this. The only way we can see if the film DID recieve mixed reviews is to look on the internet for reviews from 2008 and see if they go in mixed order as you claim. If this prediction of mixed reviews fails, then I will have to ask for your permission for an edit similar to the reception for Elysium (film) and Traitor (film) that will make the article make more sense and show the truth. While I'm looking, take a look at the reception for Date Night and see what I've been trying to explain earlier. - Theironminer 5:37 PM, 3 July, 2014

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

615,494,854

` ==Recent editing conflict== Barracuda, thanks for returning to your original User ID rather than communicating through sockpuppets. I am working seriously on this article which has been a battleground between different tendencies of white supremacists with no understanding or interest in genetics except in terms of their racial hang ups. There are a number of issues. *Firstly, half of the sources (including most of the ones you are adamant on including) have nothing to do with the Genetic history of Iberia nor do they include samples of iberian populations. There are enough genetic studies of Iberian populations for you to have to try to highlight one about Norway or Italy to support misconstrued statements, deleting the relevant ones. *Secondly, many of these sources have nothing to do with the statement they support and the editor shows extreme ignorance of population genetics e.g. discussing Haplotype U6 Y-chromosome analysis. *Thirdly, the whole article is a mess as users such as yourself strive to prove (in your case the Spanish) are the ``whitest`` with little understanding of the subject matter. *Fourthly, this article needs to have similar structure as other articles in the series, as well as higher quality of content. *Fifth, the initial introduction to types of analysis is Im sure useful for you, but also homogenizies the article with others in series. I'm going to go on editing and improving this page regardless of your racial freak out. Im tired of racist-types hijacking wikipedia articles.You are welcome to dialogue and discuss with me here on the Talk Page if you feel capable of working positively. I have invited you to find consensus, but it seems you are not interested. Only silence, and threats when you revert my edits. So be it, Ill just carry on. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

615,538,760

:I don't see how that fits into the article, but if you have a proposal you can add it here, or add it to the article.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

615,550,926

YES, I was thinking the exact same thing!! So obvious.

2,014

false

article

random

test

false

615,557,934

== May I edit this page please? == Please, can I edit this wiki page, I want to make some improvements to the modern china section.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,568,554

` : Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ``change X to Y`` format. — {{U|}} (e • • c) `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

615,575,907

` :I think this is a good idea czar `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

615,585,006

professional pedophile and rapist of cats.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

615,591,295

` ==Disambiguation== A move will need a discussion and community consensus. The fact that the park is a major landmark, recently ranked as one of the top parks in the world, it easily satisfies WP:PRIMARYTOPIC when it comes to disambiguation, and should not be unilaterally moved without consensus. Thanks, `

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

615,599,476

quite properly called

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

615,615,117

::::Don't try to bullshit me. The discussion on dates in the bibliography did not favor complete dates. You want them. Specifico & I don't. Rob was happy either way. But given that Rob has reverted back to the M-Y format, it looks like he actually prefers them. As for focus, I was gnomishly fixing the dates & Ha's surname placement, but you couldn't leave my efforts alone. (At least you left Ha alone in 2 of 3 reverts.) –

2,014

true

article

random

train

true

615,657,710

That's what needs to be done. The only way to proove they are mixed is by the dates of the reviews. - Theironminer , 1:30 AM, 5 July, 2014

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,659,874

== Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2014 == thumbnail /Users/JessMGN/Downloads/10304431_1433228970297217_7776256175788316562_n.jpg

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

615,669,811

::::::Wouldn't it be a great thing to have a good hard sniff of Maria Sharapova's fanny.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,693,255

:the only source I could find for more details is at Toho Kingdom, but issues with RS may appear using it. I watched the full cut years ago and I get the general drift. The plot section is crap though.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,720,605

== Julian Green == http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Green http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Johnson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Johnson Everywhere, it is listed that they are American-German. Even the next sentence identifies his dual citizenship. The dude is GERMAN in that he barely speaks English. Everything he does is in German. He's German who happens to play for the USA. HE IS GERMAN!!! There is no way around it. Just like Klinsmann.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

615,721,885

== Juergen Klinsmann == He represents the USA... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juergen_Klinsmann He has a USA passport. Why is he listed as a German??? You're robbing us all of the fact that Julian Green grew up almost exclusively in Germany and denying that. That's factually inaccurate and it should be pointed out that he's an American-German. What's right is right. What's accurate is accurate. Don't be a wanker.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

615,721,968

:Anytime ) Yes, but if you're not bust and if you can ) I wouldn't want to cause a lot of work, you know ) Because your list is featured among other languages as it deserves. English one is so annoying like she has never won all those awards...

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,723,379

== Bullshit - you are switching the rules... == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_P%C3%A9rez_(soccer) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Dooley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Klopas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnie_Stewart I believe that's called PRECEDENT. Now give Julian Green his due. OWNED! Yahtzee! Spank!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

615,726,377

I'll take a look at metacritic. I'll get back to you later. - Theironminer , 2:31 PM, 5 July, 2014

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,739,202

Ask yourself this: Does he know the USA National Anthem or the German? If you think he knows only the German national anthem, you need to identify that he's a German. The kid can barely speak English. Yes, he has a USA Passport, but that does not make him ONLY an American. He has a German passport which is identified in the next sentence. Please be respectful of this and quit arguing the silly point of what FIFA thinks he is. They are not Uebergods on Nationality. As the articles of the past all indicate (Thomas Dooley as an example), the correct way to do things (as have been done for ages) is to label Green as a German American. End of story.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

615,739,857

== You reporting yourself for changing my edits multiple times in a day??? == quit being a little baby about this. you are wrong and you don't like it. man up and do the right thing. And you actually reported me??? Like a four year old who is going to take his ball because things didn't go his way? How insecure are you? I suspect you're a little man with little man problems. Good luck to you, I hope it all works out for you.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

615,740,134

== Keeping you in the loop == Thought you'd probably want to know the contents of this post, so informing you directly. Hopefully Kww doesn't decide to help you notice it, by removing it.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,742,315

` :Are you serious? If I did simply buzz off every time someone like you told me to 'use my main account', you'd have never found out about the sock Werieth at all, because I sure as hell would NEVER expose any account I had with a good reputation to the likes of Future in the context of accusing one of his mates of being a sock. That's just not someone with any sense does. If you persist in removing my posts, you'll also never see any action taken against the other admins who enabled his illegitimate return to be much longer than it needed to be, and you'll never see anyone ask those ``lazy`` checkusers just why they helped, when their primary role is supposedly to be detecting socks just like Werieth. The only reason the Wikipediocracy link you found exists is precisely because of those admins/checkusers, and people like you, who thought they were helping Wikipedia by telling me to ``buzz off``. So thank you kindly for your advice, but with all due respect, I'll continue help Wikipedia the way I see fit, and I'll not be stopped in that endeavour by anyone. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,743,657

And unbelievably, people are trying to revert it from the ANI. Talk about not learning lessons. WP finally detects a sock that's evaded detection because people blindly revert 'evil socks' like me, and when I post a closing statement explaining why that took so long, and naming all the people involved who are to blame (as you seemed to want to know), they revert that! I really sympathise if you're contemplating figuriong out how to fix these obviously systemic flaws.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

615,744,440

No, I'm not. It's sad you can't see that. I will repeat, as you don't seem to get it. The only reason Wereith was found, was because of my socking. As such, my infraction is minor, compared to his massive violation - despite the multiple bans, both arbcom and community, and all the other disruption, he returned as a sock, and has managed to perform several thousand (hundreds of thousands maybe?) of edits as such. If it wasn't for people like you, and the admins and functionaries (whose names you are trying to hide from the community with these reverts), who seem to have absolutely no capacity for common sense or the common good, that could have been kept to a couple of thousand. No wonder Werieth thought he would chance his arm at a return - he obviously knew what you can achieve if you simply defeat CU and have a few admin mates. With this bizarre attitude that all socks are ebil, the rest of the community pretty much ensures such an attempt has a good chance of success. I don't mind admitting I considered dropping this a couple if times, not because of scumbags like Future, but because of people like you, but I thought better of it. In the spirit of IAR, I'll always try to help Wikipedia in the task of exposing serious violators of the SOCK policy. You can help me or hinder me, but the fact is, as this case shows, you'll never stop me.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

615,746,331

I know. The Matrix would have been a shit film indeed if there were billions of Neos and only one gullible meatsack being used as a human battery. /pwnd

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

615,748,232

:::::You reported me to AIV? Hilarious. That's one of the dick moves Werieth pulled too. Although he only did it as he knew reporting me to SPI would have probably brought him to much attention - at that stage he was still trying to keep the whole thing quiet, as it obviously benefited him. Not that he need have worried - every admin that ever responded to him, either at SPI or AIV, took the exact same view of my socking as as you espouse here (although obviously some were motivated by more than just incompetence). As such, it's likely your report to AIV is only going to ensure their names don't get picked up and the systems/attitudes/culture that cause this obviously counter-productive reaction don't get fixed - meaning that Werieth might as well try his arm at another return later. It speaks volumes that you'd think reverting me was remotely a good thing, even though in that very same ANI there's an arb explaining how he could have probably picked up on this whole thing much earlier if it wasn't for just that sort of mindless cycle of reversion and blocking of obvious socks, on the basis all socking is ebil. It's beyond idiotic.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

615,750,341

Tut tut Future Perfect at Sunrise. By my count, this is something like the 5th time you have personally removed from Wikipedia direct evidence of your own conflict of interest when it comes to Wereith/Betacommand, the person who you never wanted blocked, and the person who you did your upmost to prevent being unmasked as a sock, until it was inevitable. You're clearly still butthurt over this failure to prevent his (re-)blocking, otherwise you wouldn't still be trying to propagate the lie in edit summaries like these and your block log message, that I was somehow harassing Werieth. As the record now shows, all I ever did, was accuse Werieth of being a sock, and link to the evidence that showed it. Making accusations of sock-puppetry backed up with evidence is neither harassment or trolling, especially now that it has been shown to be true. Your past removals of that evidence, to try and make it look like I was a 'harassment troll', is now a matter of record. Blocking this account won't help you hide it any more than Werieth's calls for your assistance helped him.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,750,457

== Giving other editor's warnings == Hi there, In future, could you perhaps not spam another editor's talk page with 'final warnings'? If you have to give them a final warning, please come and find an administrator, as there's really only one place you can go to after 'final'. It makes the warning more effective too. Thank you! Happy editing.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

615,751,560

, 5 July 2014 (UTC) :::::::Oh noes. How will I ever recover from you not giving me any respect. Perhaps I'll reflect on the fact that a) you're a total moron who wouldn't know a true benefit to Wikipedia if it hit you in the face, and b) most, if not all, of what you know about me has been filtered through the grubby hands of Future Perfect, et al. They control what version of the truth you see here. The sad fact is, you don't have a fucking clue about what I've been doing. According to Future, I've been accusing Werieth of being a sock, without evidence. Which in his book is trolling/harassment. That's his version. Back in the real world - see all that evidence on Wikipediocracy - I've been trying to post that here from day one, because I came up with it. The reason why you can't see it anywhere here, is because corrupt bastards like Future know that for every Wikipedian who has a clue, there's plenty who are as retarded as you, and will believe him when he says it never existed, and that I'm a troll. I can't spell it out any more clearer than this - he never wanted Betacommand banned, he never wanted Werieth exposed. Just do the fucking math, or forever be his loyal subject, whose only true freedom is to lick his (jack) boots for the iron in the dirt. Seriously, if you're goal is to persuade me to not lift a finger when I figure out what Beta's next account name is, you're the one doing a 'stand up' job. 22:35

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,754,937

` @ - do not listen to the lies of Future Perfect. Does this look like someone who had ``no particular involvement`` in defending Betacommand? Does someone with hundreds of admin actions in WP:NFCC areas sound like someone who had no idea how Betacommand/Werieth edited? Post your concerns about these obvious lies of omission at that ANI thread, and if you don't get any answers, complain to arbcom - they have final authority over admins who so clearly abuse their positions to protect their friends, or indeed themselves. His high and mighty attitude to so called troll socks has only one real goal - it helps him justify his naked attempts to control what people find out about him. Some people call that a conflict of interest, some people would describe such admin actions as a violation of WP:INVOLVED. He doesn't, of course. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

615,762,537

` == Matt Drudge: Habonim == Malik: I understand that Facebook is a tricky source to rely on. In this case I am pointing to a discussion group for Habonim-Dror Camp Moshava alumni with first-hand, primary-source knowledge of Matt Drudge's attendance at the summer camp. The discussion thread underway in Facebook includes numerous anecdotes and photographs of young Matt at Habonim-Dror Camp Moshava. This is primary material from numerous sources. What more could you ask for? I can assure you that this would be good enough factual back-up for the New York Times to run with it. Yes, it's true that there seems not to be any reference on the web currently to Drudge's summer camp attendance. But why in the world would this be considered better sourcing than a half dozen people who actually went to camp with the guy? I can't figure out how to upload an image otherwise I'd show you a screenshot of the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :Perhaps you're not familiar with Wikipedia's core policies, WP:V and WP:BLP. Facebook is never a reliable source, even if a person named Matt Drudge posted on the Habonim Dror alumni page saying that he was a member. — / Malik: I get that Facebook would be a bad source. But Facebook is not the source here. The sources are multiple individual alumni of Habonim-Dror Camp Moshava who are confirming that Matt Drudge was, in fact, a camper at Mosh. They are backing up their claims with photographs of Matt Drudge as a young camper and numerous anecdotes. Unlike you, these sources are using their actual names and identities and can easily be contacted to verify. What is the problem here? Has Drudge complained or asked for his name to be removed from Wikipedia? I do not understand why you would make an issue of this when there are a number of other un-sourced names on that list. Unless Drudge is personally objecting, this seems like a very strange fight to pick. Were you a member of Habonim-Dror or are you knowledgeable about the youth movement's history? What is your particular source of authority to edit the page? BTW... I will just add that the bullet-pointed list was a very nice touch! That's way better. So, thanks for doing that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :Please read WP:Verifiability: ::In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. (Footnote omitted.) :Where is the previously published information concerning Matt Drudge and Habonim? The experiences of his fellow campers just don't count as reliable sources in the Wikipedia world. — / ::And my ``authority`` to edit the page comes from my ability to research and read sources. My interest in the subject, which is a separate matter, comes from my having been a member of Habonim (before the merger). — / `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

615,808,243

REDIRECT Talk:Alex MacDonald (footballer, born 1990)

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

615,816,363

` :: Actually the material is MOVED from Radeon HD 2000 Series and Radeon HD 3000 Series. I leave it up to the ``creator`` of to clear who copied from whom... `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,816,534

== Reply == I replied what you wrote on my talk page but I dediced to write here to after I found out you're using en.wiki too ) My reply was: Anytime ) Yes, but if you're not bust and if you can ) I wouldn't want to cause a lot of work, you know ) Because your list is featured among other languages as it deserves. English one is so annoying like she has never won all those awards...

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

615,844,140

REDIRECT Talk:Death of Meredith Hunter

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

615,851,227

` == qaradawi == Referenced with footnote 31 it is stated, that a ``scholar in Egypt`` has spoken against al-Baghdadi. This is wrong, because al-Qaradawi (although he is an Egyptian) lives in Qatar, because the Muslim Brotherhood is outlawed in Egypt. `

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

615,864,047

== Notability == I think a WP:BLAR to LPRadicals should be implemented. Her notability as a stand-alone article is marginal at best. –

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

615,891,194

== Final airdate reference? == I'm confused as to whether ref. #1 should stay or be removed? I have no reason to doubt that her final contract appearance was Sept. 7, 2005 (in fact, I do know it was in 2005 so whoever wrote that probably knew Sept. 7th to be correct as well) but, the ref. cited neither confirms nor denies it so should the link be removed? I don't really know much about referencing. Thanks in advance to any who respond.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,891,373

` She's been primarily going by ``Winters`` ever since first marrying Malcolm. I think I've seen her credited as ``Dr. Olivia Hastings Winters`` but, am not positive about that. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,898,819

REDIRECT Talk:Márcio Ferreira de Souza

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

615,924,894

== Photo label == I am pretty sure the label for the photo for the woman actress is wrong. In the photo, here real name is visible; so it is unlikely that that is she as the character. It looks more like the actress is at some-thing like a press conference or a panel discussion as herself (perhaps talking about her character).

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

615,942,519

`Harassment == As I read the Wikipedia guidelines, Harassment is regarded as far worse than any perceived COI. To quote ``to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Wikipedia unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to discourage them from editing entirely.`` - which is exactly how I feel. == COI == This is my statement When I first took an interest in Wikipedia I scratched my head for subjects to take on. During the process of Googling old friends and acquaintance - as everyone does - I discovered that an old friend Greg Day was now running a PR company and I looked up one or two of his clients. Seeing that one or two - Kevin Howarth, Simon Rumley, were not mentioned on Wikipedia I thought that I would have a go at tackling them. I could have contributed to many other pages - and have - but I wanted to be the initiator of a page that no one had tackled before. Not long afterwards Greg Day got in touch and mentioned that he had seen the pages. He said ``how would I like to be an associate of the company`` and - being a journalist and always looking for extra bits on the CV - I said why not. I then went on and edited Alan Jones and Hayley-Marie Axe, never thinking that any conflict of interest was involved. I still do not think that any COI was involved since a) I was never paid to do it b) I was never requested to do it c) I was trying to make a statement and not advocating or promoting anyone's career d) Writing and researching Wikipedia is just a hobby, end of. If that is so then you may as well say there is a COI over my edits of the Bolingbrokes and the Somervilles to whom my connections are no less nor more than the Howarths and the Rumleys - random topics of interest. That does not constitute a COI. == Liquid Nitrogen == I am sorry, but I do not see your point in removing my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • ==COI== whatever you think best. I wouldn't mind, but this ``policy`` seems to be applied in a random fashion and would only be fair if it was applied universally. Are you seriously expecting me to believe that the editors who originate pages about commercial product don't have some vested interests and/or COI. One would have to suspend disbelief to take that line. I have read not one but dozens of articles that do a wonderful job of promoting commercial interests. I guess it's one law for the independent editors and another for the corporations. Thus was it always. Rather than picking on people like me and making mountains out of molehills it would serve Wikipedia better to weed out the real abuses by cynical commercial interests rather than the perceived ones. Anyway, I do not own the pages discussed, so people can do whatever they like. I'm sure Jimmy wales never intended Wikipedia to become such a bear pit! ==Stange Behaviour By Editor McGeddon== I am not sure how such a simple process of factually updating a wiki page has turned into what i can only describe as a strange obsession by a person calling themselves McGeddon. I have no idea what this persistent person who i can only describe as an INTERNET TROLL's motives are. I have been asked to update prominent south african artist wiki pages with factual information that is flattering to the artists therefore promoting South Africa. If that is a crime then i apologise but the fact is i have no connection to the artist apart from the country i live in and the love of art. In response to the Thandi Zambo and Thandi Moyo, they are both me, I couldn't remember my password for Zambo, which is my maiden name, so i made Moyo, which is my married name. This strange person McGeddon, who obviously is a very empty person with nothing in his life is harassing me and vandalising all my hard work. I see he does this to everyone, it's probably because he has no power in the real world. Anyway i am moving on from this project and i will have to change my username when i look at other south african artists to update their pages to save myself from harassment from this TROLL. I admit i am not an expert at editing wiki pages but instead of assistance from this McGeddon he choose the vindictive route flexing his technical knowledge. He must hide behind his computer and live out his useless existence. Regards Thandi Moyo (nee Zambo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == Clout == I am more than happy for that to be done; as I've said before I have no vested interest and feel that I have run foul of the catch-all COI regulations which don't seem to allow for commonsense. I have got so many other things to do and when editing Wikipedia stops being a pleasure then all I can say is that it's a sad day indeed. So I won't be doing anything apart from maybe looking at my Walter and Jane Somerville pages, one of which has already attracted attention. To say that one of the world's leading cardiologists is not notable is crassly ignorant and extremely insulting. == Liquid Nitrogen == I mean in classrooms when students learn about liquid nitrogen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == Liquid Nitrogen == Hmm...I see. Ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

615,947,554

` ==McGeddon== Thomas.W what i am doing is no different to what McGeddon ``the troll`` is doing to me!!!! Any changes i make he undoes, so i'm showing him how it feels!!!! `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

true

615,947,733

==Greetings== Hi McGeddon how are you?

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,950,840

:: I agree with you, McGeddon's editing is vindictive and heavy handed. If you look at his talk page many would also agree with me, even though he removes the bad comments about himself!!! He is an unproductive troll vindictively ruining peoples hard work. I edit under another name now because of him!!! He harassed me while i was editing the profile of Conor Mccreedy, now it's on his watch list so if anyone makes any changes he vindictively undoes the changes and adds loads of citations!!! Poor Conor Mccreedy is getting his page mucked up and he doesn't even know what's going on!!! I feel responsible because troll McGeddon thinks i have a connection to Conor Mccreedy.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,952,271

::: Oh I get it, thanks anyway )

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

615,962,556

REDIRECT Talk:The Secret of the Sagala

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

615,976,053

I think the reference for NWOBHM should be used instead being things like WASP and other styles of metal could come got mind where as NWOBHM narrows the focus to the raw aggressive sounds associated with that scene rather that early metal itself . though it can be said Led Zeppelin and others power have had an influence on the early punk and hardcore punk musicians , MWOBHM seems to be more appropriate .

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

615,977,763

The article as with some, people take too far and feel the need to fill every crevice with a photo . The story is the Content and the text . Not how many pictures can be shoved in every space . let's delete something else like a band . it has too many pictures its starting to look amateur more than it does with all the photos it has now .Many articles of Huge Bands, companies, genres, have a Few Pictures . Not ones to try and promote bands profiles .Thats what this one has . At least a few times .

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

615,978,721

Already Fourteen Photos . Far more than most of this size. Maybe its a good idea to request a mediator .

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

615,980,315

== Alice Kurashige note == Thanks. I've been a bit busy and will get to the article when I have time.

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

615,983,654

` The Punk Rock page has more ``meat`` in the text and its a LOT of text Content then a photo so the glance is in favor of the text . I do see some areas that can be fleshed out . I think the hardcore page wouldn't work with every section in depth like theirs, thats what makes this page also unique to hardcore , but I do think that some sections here are too small and that would work to balance out the photos to keep the text the main teaching and learning tool . I would like to resize the photo of zines a little smaller even if it has to be re-uploaded . Then it might now be too much and too ``busy`` . People read to retain information the right set up enhances that . Too many pictures are a distraction . They take away from the knowledge . More fleshed out sections can help . Ill brainstorm on that until later . I guess add the picture, if it bumps the others too far out of whack we can resize it or when the story gets fleshed out a little, maybe it will balance itself out more. The third option is we can fill out some sections more . Make it more balanced and then add the zines' photo, after, so it Accentuates and isn't the meat and potatoes of the section . the sections of ``influence on other genres`` . That could be good place to start adding more content(depth) . Ill study some other pages meanwhile when I get a chance then bring that knowledge here . a little later . Thanks a lot . I love to share knowledge and I like sharing that here for free . `

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

615,987,836

Well, Smallboy ... why don't you try doing proper research? In stead of circular references to your own Wiki pages based on press releases ,which in turn come from earlier versions of the same Wiki page .. and so on. You are pompous, self-important oaf of limited intelligence and no doubt to complete the stereotype, are almost certainly, weak, ineffectual and effeminate in the real world. Must make you a real hit with the ladies, eh? Later, loser.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

615,988,940

== Please refrain from personal attacks == Please do not launch any personal attacks, like you did here, or I will request for an administrator to intervene. You are, of course, always free to provide constructive feedback anytime. Thank you. -

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

615,990,163

` :::No argument. Predators of any kind have to be dealt with in an appropriate way. ``My object all sublime / I shall achieve in time / To let the punishment fit the crime / The punishment fit the crime...`` ← '''' → `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

615,991,780

` == Sorry to disturb you == Hello, sorry to disturb you, but I saw you were active on the ref desk and this is really bugging me: I could do with someone to confirm that it's not just my phone which is showing this. I thought the weirdness would also interest you. This image here either embedded on a page, or on the image page, or by clicking on the thumbnail in the timeline, I get a grainy black and white portrait photo of someone staring at the camera. But according to the thumbnail and the description, it's an etching of an execution. There doesn't look like there are any edits or changes in the history. It's really creeping me out: please tell me it happens to you too. :Just now noticed your comment. I'm not seeing what you're seeing, so I don't know what to tell you. ← '''' → ::I see that you conversed with the help desk, and they pointed you to File:Rizana Nafeek (1988-2013).jpg. Very grainy picture. I gather someone vandalized something and that it was then repaired. ← '''' → == Why don't you go a step further... == And delete all areas on Wikipedia relating to child-adult contact. Ancient Greece, psychology sections etc. Just take your sledge hammer to all of it since you are the omnipotent one, and you know best? — Preceding unsigned comment added by :Good deal. I'll get on it right away. ← '''' → ``God bless America``. Sigh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

615,994,922

:Just now saw this, two days after you posted it. I am nothing if not prompt. ( Looking at , I'm inclined to wait-and-see. It's also worth pointing out that checkusers won't look at IP's. So I advise doing nothing at the moment except to stay alert. ← '''' →

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

616,006,736

== Possible page about the Ukrainian community in Portugal == Iryna, since you're of Ukrainian descent and I am from Portugal, and Portugal, by what I've seen, has the 2nd largest Ukrainian community in Western Europe (only behind Italy), with between 40-150 thousand people (figure from wikipedia), do you think it could be a good idea to start a page about this community, in Portugal? I'd be very glad to contribute for such eventual page! |}

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

616,024,905

` why don't we try and add more substance to some sections and add maybe one of those. metallica and nirvana are music relative . zines and moshing are fan relative . Hardcore Punk is about Music Essentially, without music there would be nothing to ``mosh`` to nor anything to write about . I would never want to delete people who helped define genres, by influencing other influencers . Such as metallica . The page is about Hardcore Punk and its sub genres. Not too much about gloves, clothes, chewing gum, watches, moshing, sneakers . that stuff has its own page and pages and really doesn't ``define`` the Sound of which is Hardcore Punk . Whats your take on it . `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

616,050,737

REDIRECT Talk:List of television and radio stations in Metro Cebu

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

616,051,983

July 2014 I've reverted your edit at Vincent Tan - it was unencyclopedic and unreferenced. Find a newspaper article about his company contributing to deforestation and the fact can be included - expressed in a neutral way.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

616,067,341

:Also support equivalent merge for Directorate-General for Justice (European Commission)

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

616,074,224

Vandalism? Don't use words which you do not understand. Also do not try to ape proper encyclopedists. It is risible, call-centre boy.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

true

616,100,206

:::::::Muffinator, do you consider it negative when autism is described as a diagnosed condition?

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

616,122,165

== Your sockpuppet's account is blocked forever == has been blocked indefinitely. I don't understand how a muslim like you can lie in this month of Ramadan. However you have still , so you are very lucky and you can still enjoy. I will not gain anything if the admins block also . I have just discovered that most of List of British Bangladeshis's articles were created from you. (BUT I DO NOT KNOW WHY YOUR BODY TAKES FIRE WHEN I CREATE ARTICLES ABOUT BRITISH BANGLADESHI MUSLIM'S SCHOLAR) From now on try to be a good editor. May Allah give you tawfeeq.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

616,127,727

== Edit morocco and tunisia == Im here to talk about those edits. Moroccan edit is unexplainably bad. Information is false. Moroccans and other north africans belong to a group called metatids along with somalian, ethoipians, egyptians etc. All people whom are light skinned no matter what race asain caucasian whatever get a tan in sunlight due to lack of melanin in skin cells thats simple science everyone learns that in grade school. The tunisian one no matter what you say I dont care its 'cited' it is contradictory and false information. There are numerous other studies refuting theirs and the piece appears biased. As someone who is half tunisian blood I know a lot about this subject north africa and have read multiple reports refuting and proving how wrong outlandish the persons writing on those generally are.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

616,149,724

== Go-around incident removed == The recent go-around incident at Barcelona-El Prat Airport (BCN) has been removed () on the basis of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NO LE. Furthermore, the edit unexplainedly removed sourced content. Please discuss here before attemtping to reinstate the BCN incident. Thanks.'''' ''

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

616,174,763

**All of the top hits referenced in that list don't necessarily reflect the overall Top 40 of just one area. Every country has their own music chart (ie U.K. is represented by the Official Charts; Japan's Oricon.) And each song listed can be represented as the biggest hit of that genre over the year.

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

616,193,432

has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

616,196,444

| has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina! has a mangina!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

616,217,492

` :Does the lede for evolution mention ``teach the controversy``? No, of course not. Does the lede for Earth mention the Flat-Earth society? No, of course not. Does the lede for sociology mention phrenology? No, of course not. Does the lede for christianity mention that some catholics do not consider protestants to be christian (and vice-versa)? No, of course not. The lede is not for such things. Please stop trying to make it be that way, given your complete misreading and misunderstanding of WP:LEAD. And please don't say that those articles are not relevant to this discussion, for they are. It's called ``consistency``. You will have to explain to all of us why you think anarchocapitalism is so special that it deserves this special treatment that other articles don't have. - `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

616,220,391

Why you did not vote to keep those articles? Now you created another strange SPI. Try to be a good editor like the greeneditor

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

616,223,266

`:Hi, it is not contradictory there. If you read the whole sentence it states only in ``static`` languages that have the ability to force type resolution at runtime. For those that don't, the comparisons are valid. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

616,241,971

. Fu ck ing trollreasons

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

616,243,180

i have too many ip addresses, and i shall continue to destry user cavarrone's page, you can not do anuthing

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

616,243,622

let me change my ip address and then look.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

616,244,432

== Deletion of MJ Mohamed Iqbal Page == Can you please let me know the reason behind deletion of MJ Mohamed Iqbal Page?

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

616,246,316

I think zines are important too . Enough to be there . I really idealistically wish the picture wasn't so large . what do you think . It currently can't be resized , I don't think . what do you feel .

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

616,246,387

I also think you should add it instead of the moshing picture .

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

616,249,962

`I was going to say! Don't forget Jimbo and Tara Reid!♦ `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

616,287,701

The sentence that both of you want added is completely irrelevant to what anarchocapitalism is, and is dealt with in the body of the text. I'll give you an example via wikiprecedent: christianity. The lede does say that protestantism came from catholicism, just as the lede for anarchocapitalism says that it is an individualist anarchism form (parent). But the lede of christianity does not say (though it could with references) that the catholics did not consider protestants to be christian (and vice-versa). And given that historically western christianity was catholic only for a thousand years, we see the argument from antiquity attempt clearly fail. :::As to what you misunderstand, Binksternet, it is due weight. I'll give another wikiprecedent: evolution. There is neither mention of creationism nor ID in the lede for evolution. At all. Period. But it is clearly significant enough to have been brought up in court in the US many times regarding the teaching of it and of ID. One would think, then, that it would get mentioned. But no, it's not. Why? Because it's irrelevant to what evolution is. Similarly, that some people view anarchocapitalism as not part of anarchism is irrelevant to the lede as well. -

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

616,303,707

` Hi everyone. Why is there no ``lifestyle`` section (as in the case of Moa Kikuchi) that mention Nakamoto's favorite bands/artists, as well as metal bands she claimed to like (e.g. Arch Enemy), either for herself or along with her fellow Babymetal members (i.e. Metallica, Iron Maiden)? `

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

616,303,779

:Hello [User:2A02:2788:104:166:D54F:3413:1EDD:767B| IP User 2A02:2788:104:166:D54F:3413:1EDD:767B]! The article was deleted because it was advertising and promotion and was not shown to be notable enough for Wikipedia standards. This isn't a personal attack on your article, and I understand that it was created with the best of intentions to contribute to Wikipedia. However, when a page gets speedy-deleted for those reasons, generally the problem is that the article isn't written in a very neutral manner and/or that not enough outside references can be cited to show that it is actually a page that should be on Wikipedia. For example, if you include a phrase in an article about a company saying it provides excellent customer service, that is not neutral and is considered advertisement. However, mentioning that the company has won three national awards for customer service and is featured in several prominent news sources (and providing citations to prove those awards) is neutral. If you have sources showing why that company is important, feel free to create articles on that subject. Better yet, you may want to try creating articles in the Sandbox, where you can write articles and improve them with the help of others before moving it into main article space. Thanks!

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

616,311,817

REDIRECT Talk:The Song Is Over

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

616,324,302

Thank you for the explanation. Now I know exactly what your issue is. Not. Seriously, can you be any more ignorant? I mean, are you actually trying to be an asshole? It's a simple process - you object to something, I ask what the issue is, you give an answer. Prick.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

616,328,306

` You know what, forget it. The guy who was repeatedly changing the opening and led me to post what was previously here, because he repeatedly refused to answer the simple question of why (except of course to start SHOUTING) has reported me for not being civil. How ironic is that. Rather than have a long detailed discussion here about which opening is better, I'll simply point out that in the current version, even after you read the entire first paragraph, you still don't have a clue why this article exists. You do find out what Marco Rodríguez does for a living though. So yay for that. I guess once you get to the end, you do get some idea why this has been such a big deal, but that's assuming you haven't fallen asleep, or shot yourself, having read the same four words - Brazil, Germany, biggest & loss (and their million variants), multiple times. Seriously, if people here think what's currently serving as an opening to this article summarises the key points in an engaging and professional way, perhaps you need to get a job where your actually paid to write for a living. It's not quite garbage, but it's not good. And please stop justifying such poor/dull/repetitive/trivial writing with the claim the alternatives are ``unencyclopedic``, frankly you couldn't be more wrong. There's no serious disagreement out in the world that this defeat was a shock result and a national humiliation - that will be upfront in the key summary of every decent source writing about this match, both now and in 20 years time. If you don't want it to be in this one, please think of a better reason than ``unencyclopedic``, if only that the victims might have a clue what it is you actually mean. That said, on the offchance anyone with any ability for writing gets around to working on this article, here's what the opening should look like, if you're trying to engage the reader while summarizing the key points. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than the crap people fought tooth and nail to replace it with. Brazil 1–7 Germany was the shock result of the first semi-final of the 2014 FIFA World Cup men's international football tournament, played on 8 July at the Estádio Mineirão in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. It broke Brazil's 62-match home unbeaten streak in competitive matches going back to 1975, and equalled their biggest margin of defeat, tied with a 6–0 loss to Uruguay in 1920, leading it to be described as a national humiliation. The game also saw Germany score the most goals in World Cup history, their 223 overtaking Brazil's 221. Their second goal meant Germany's Miroslav Klose reached 16 World Cup goals, overtaking Brazil's Ronaldo as the tournament's all-time record goalscorer. The game was subsequently referred to by the press as the Mineirazo, evoking the spirit of the Maracanazo in which Brazil unexpectedly lost the 1950 FIFA World Cup on home soil to Uruguay.`

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

616,328,636

` You know what, forget it. The guy who was repeatedly changing the opening and led me to post what was previously here, because he repeatedly refused to answer the simple question of why (except of course to start SHOUTING) has reported me for not being civil. How ironic is that. Rather than have a long detailed discussion here about which opening is better, I'll simply point out that in the current version, even after you read the entire first paragraph, you still don't have a clue why this article exists. You do find out what Marco Rodríguez does for a living though. So yay for that. I guess once you get to the end, you do get some idea why this has been such a big deal, but that's assuming you haven't fallen asleep, or shot yourself, having read the same four words - Brazil, Germany, biggest & loss (and their million variants), multiple times. Seriously, if people here think what's currently serving as an opening to this article summarises the key points in an engaging and professional way, perhaps you need to get a job where your actually paid to write for a living. It's not quite garbage, but it's not good. And please stop justifying such poor/dull/repetitive/trivial writing with the claim the alternatives are ``unencyclopedic``, frankly you couldn't be more wrong. There's no serious disagreement out in the world that this defeat was a shock result and a national humiliation - that will be upfront in the key summary of every decent source writing about this match, both now and in 20 years time. If you don't want it to be in this one, please think of a better reason than ``unencyclopedic``, if only that the victims might have a clue what it is you actually mean. That said, on the offchance anyone with any ability for writing gets around to working on this article, here's what the opening should look like, if you're trying to engage the reader while summarizing the key points. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than the crap people fought tooth and nail to replace it with. Brazil 1–7 Germany was the shock result of the first semi-final of the 2014 FIFA World Cup men's international football tournament, played on 8 July at the Estádio Mineirão in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. It broke Brazil's 62-match home unbeaten streak in competitive matches going back to 1975, and equalled their biggest margin of defeat, tied with a 6–0 loss to Uruguay in 1920, leading it to be described as a national humiliation. The game also saw Germany score the most goals in World Cup history, their 223 overtaking Brazil's 221. Their second goal meant Germany's Miroslav Klose reached 16 World Cup goals, overtaking Brazil's Ronaldo as the tournament's all-time record goalscorer. The game was subsequently referred to by the press as the Mineirazo, evoking the spirit of the Maracanazo in which Brazil unexpectedly lost the 1950 FIFA World Cup on home soil to Uruguay. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

616,329,820

expecting a conclusion here. Having already realised this was going to be a giant waste of time, as nobody here seems to comprehend what 'give me a specific example' means, I did attempt to close off the previous content and just leave the above, but surprise surprise, that's against the rules. Sorry.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false