rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
614,055,800
|
Nastaliq was officially used in whole of North india including the bhojpuri region. All official works were done in this script. Even hindi was written in nastaliq. This is what today known as urdu. Devnagri was adopted later on to restore its traditional script used before islamic rule in india.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,057,778
|
wikibreak | back=whenever the community rids itself of double standards, adopts an instant-block policy towards those who call others out for clinical conditions (regardless of intent/tone), sets a cap at the number of administrators to 1,000 or less and more stringent criteria for what constitutes an active admin (i.e. at least 30% non-automated, other than AWB, main-space edits/month), and rid itself of geographic systematic bias. In other words, never.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
614,075,040
|
::I see you've removed the maintenance templates yet again. Please don't do this without first addressing all the problems covered by the templates. It seems your edit added a reference in an attempt to solve one of the problems (notability) though note that the source you added is not a reliable source, as that book is simply a reproduction of material from our own wikis (including information from Wikipedia). We can't cite ourselves as a source of factual information or as proof of the subject's notability. —
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,109,279
|
== White privilege == You understand that that , , and others are gaming the system and exploiting numbers and rules to proliferate their own discriminatory views, right?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
614,109,298
|
::Yay! He's been on my to-do list for a long time. He was not only Irving Gill's nephew, he was also his business partner and collaborator. He's been a redlink in a lot of articles. Great that you did this and I'll take a look later today when I have more time.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,126,949
|
` == me == Me sockpuppet? Why? Just because I have written more that 1000 words here, and some of them look like this? It could be worth putting together an WP:CHK. Let me know. Thanks '''''' `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,150,321
|
:Watching. There is no mass attack at the moment.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,170,498
|
Unsigned Alright so, because the person who wrote the above paragraph has used acronyms that no one is going to understand, I'll clarify them. * MIM (Maoist Internationalist Movement) * JDPON (Joint-Dictatorship of the Proletariat of Oppressed Nations) * IRTR (It's Right To Rebel) * PF (Prairie Fire), a persyn's (involved with IRTR) moniker * STP (Serve The People), a persyn's (involved with IRTR) moniker * LLCO (Leading Light Communist Organization), a post-IRTR project, which split from MIM and thereafter, spawned RAIM
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,177,319
|
` == General ``Neutrality`` Comments == *I believe the overt problem with this article in terms of a public/mass education type read is that as currently written, a reader comes away with a very positive outlook on the Nordic Model not just as an economic organizing philosophy, but as a societal force. **Once can argue that it is in FACT a POSITIVE ``economic organizing philosophy`` though that demands a subjective opinion cast onto the reader, rather than the statistical facts, counterpoints, and contrasts. **On can also argue that NEGATIVE facts have been obscured in the article, and that the ``philosophy/system`` is in fact not well portrayed both as an 'on the ground economic reality' (I think we can agree that the Nordic model has not produced economic utopia in Scandinavia), or as a unique approach to state-sponsored economic management, a child of historical forces as much as fiat and cultural experience. *The POINT is that this issue is very politicized, especially in the United States, where active ideological disagreements lead to common and frequent references to the Nordic Model as being an ideal to be followed, while those who disagree (FULL disclosure: I am American, and prefer the Swiss economic model above all), do so on widely divergent planes with all manner of critique. *What I am proposing: The article intentional or not gives one the impression that the Nordic Model is the ``solution`` to the ``problem`` that is Economics. This isn't simply bias, it's completely an original and novel conclusion that befits a thesis or a book, not an information encyclopedia entry which presumes little to know advance knowledge, and hopefully presents the reader the opportunity to form a brief opinion pending further learning - I believe that is the main purpose of Wikipedia article entries; I may be wrong, that's how I use it. *Whether because of lack of reference, statistics, or even better coverage of the LONG academic study and (American) pop-culture obsession with this issue (which is rife with misinformation of all manner), I believe the article needs serious ``attention from an expert`` to specifically delineate how and why the Nordic Model exists (it's close with this), the consequences of the model for the societies it is used it (weak on this), the costs and benefits (article mentions one type of tax (income?) and even then very vaguely with a number, though the income tax system is graduated I believe), costs/problems aren't really mentioned. *I actually do NOT believe the article requires a ``critique`` section - Economic models, national or otherwise, should speak for themselves, and importantly, should note where conclusions are being extrapolated. (e.g. Does the Nordic Model produce low crime? This is a causation assumption (it has been studied, I don't know the current thinking), but this type of argument is tempting when one writes about economic structures. We must be cautious.`
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,184,510
|
::As I understand it, a priest cannot actually deprive someone of Holy Communion, since all it takes to be un-excommunicated is to make a true repentance to any priest, any where (or at worst thru a bishop). This whole matter escalated quickly to an RFC, and I'm fully willing to discuss compromise language.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,199,035
|
Antisemitism in the United Kingdom#2014
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,203,015
|
` ::Fine. I assume they have the best intentions. However it is clear that the aforementioned users have, with the best intentions, stacked the vote like we see in the 3v1 shoutdowns, and Gamed the system in so far as ``maintaining a non-neutral point of view`` as it can be seen most pages they are on have an NPOV flag and any edits that attempt to fix the perspective are filibustered. Perhaps, in their good faith, such users simply forgot, in doctoral induced haze, that opinions contradicting their own are worthy of consideration?`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,214,062
|
Yes, I agree, but as I am an employee of a different part of Ultra, I am not best placed to fix it! It is quite embarassing. However, I am working on fixing some links that have broken due to Ultra having reworked their web site, which I don't think compromises neutrality as it is a simple correction of links. I have not got time to do all the links right now, will be back later. Hopefully someone will be along with the time to re-write the whole thing, as there is interesting technology here, and we really do not want to look like an advert, just present the facts, whatever they may be. I am not an expert in this field.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,218,994
|
` == Friendly request. == Hello King of Hearts. As I'm fairly sure you are aware, some of the HTML code in your signature is deprecated or obsolete. This means that a good portion of your signature is dropped from pages in some browsers (I see just `` ♠`` on my BlackBerry). As such, I was wondering if you would be willing to update your code a little bit. If you are willing, I suggest replacing: with: which will result in a 201 character long signature (38 characters shorter) with an appearance of: ♣ ♠ compared to your existing 239 character long signature of: ♠ — Either way. Happy editing! — {{U|}} (e • • c) `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,220,393
|
` :::Yeah Littlecarmen's right. If you can directly put Pop to infobox of Lana Del Rey and pure pop artists like Britney Spears I think in that way Pop loses its feature. It may not be that (Alternative) Rock but it's not that Pop too. I can't see ANY material's genre on ``Lana is a pop music original full-stop`` sentence by the way... `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,232,986
|
` == CouldYouFixSevillaPlease? == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Viva Sevilla! |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevilla_FC#Current_squad Bendtner isn't playing for Sevilla and goalie Javi Varas still is but a lot of people have been removing players from their current squad, when in actual fact most of those players have probably stayed put. |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,238,970
|
== US 2015 Auction Restrictions == The full details of the FCC's restrictions on the 600MHz spectrum were released early this month (http://www.fcc.gov/document/mobile-spectrum-holdings-report-and-order). I'd like to add a sentence or two to the bit on restrictions but I'm a new editor and I don't know if it's acceptable to cite the FCC itself or I should be looking for news coverage summarizing it. Any advice would be appreciated.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,252,621
|
There is a citation for the Mr. Ed is a zebra. There was no citations for the other stuff that was put in it's place.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,255,116
|
sexual congress with goats
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,255,553
|
NE2 enjoys sexual congress with goats
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,265,759
|
——————————— Hahahah get fucked filthy mudslime https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz90k9mug24
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,271,962
|
== Bot error dating maintenance tag == In this edit the bot replaced the parameter when it should have added another parameter. See the next edit to see how I fixed it. Thanks,
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,281,656
|
` == Setting? == Does the programme ever say where it's taking place? It mentions real Toronto neighbourhoods: Parkdale, the Junction, Scarborough (Scarberia). A Toronto area code is seen (647). But the frequent shots of the downtown skyline carefully avoid the CN Tower. And the police dept. has ``precincts`` and ``lootenants``, so it isn't Toronto. `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,286,542
|
Maybe people are not prepared to accept the whitewash that the wiki admins and OTRS people are trying to impose. Why not have a discussion about what exactly is allowed on the page? When a subject is quite happy to give interviews to the national press discussing their life for publicity they can't then demand complete privacy. )
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,295,430
|
Oppose. I oppose the merger of the Canadian and UK albums.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,304,864
|
. 300(1K) is 300 times as hot as 1K. 300(1°C) is not 300 times as hot as 1°C
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,305,934
|
`Welcome! Hello, Jepoic, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account with Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: * The five pillars of Wikipedia * How to edit a page * Help pages * Tutorial * How to write a great article * Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! • • Log) `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,314,768
|
(if he remembers giving you that beer, that is)
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,340,765
|
` :User:MarnetteD – yes, I tried. No, they wouldn't listen. They took it to Wikipedia_talk:Categories_for_discussion#Question_regarding_categories and made a dozen or so reverts without any consensus having been reached, which was down right cheeky and tendentious. Take a look at their block log, they have a habit or WP:3RR reverting when they can't get their own way. Ignoring consensus is one thing, inventing it to create a ``revertable POV`` is bad faith, no matter what the edit involves. Editor made a controversy where not exists in this category. Creating drama for the sake of POV doesn't make ends meets. `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,341,369
|
:::I don't need to revert any more, they're all done as far as I can tell. Fresh actors will need adding to the category, but I'll wait for you to look at it first, thanks Jim.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,348,143
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 25 June 2014 == The Hogenakkal is locates in Karnataka state. Please make this correction.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,351,222
|
` :::::MarnetteD clearly has a watch list longer than my arm given his response time to reverting things, so he'll see what's been done and will just have to deal with it. While categories may require reliable sourcing, to a degree, the fact remains than for so many actors dating back to the 50s, 60s, 70s, especially, there is unlikely to be centralised sourcing, though many books are in print, such as actor biogs, few editors are really going to dig them all out and cite hundreds of actors entire career for each TV and film appearance, it would take months, even years, of effort. Wikipedia:Citing IMDb notes that IMDB has been a constant source of dispute over its reliability. However, for a category to simply state ``this person was a Western (genre) TV actor`` hardly requires AAA-rated reliable sourcing, and I do believe than IMDB meets the requirements as a tertiary source, confirming the fact that all those actors were active in that genre. Many of the individual articles for each Western TV series don't contain any more sourcing than IMDB, so it is not wrong to identify MarnetteD's reverts as ``missing the point`` when it comes to avoiding WP:POINTed behaviour. A tertiary source is better than no source at all, and categories are hardly top-level articles worth war-editing over. I find his behaviour protracted, bullyish and contrived as well as completely lacking WP:AGF standards. He needs to holster his attitude, because I'm not afraid to present his behaviour, including repeated history of the same behaviour, to ANI/EW and request that action be taken for his abuse of policy and anti-IP sniping motions. The lack of maturity exhibited in reverting those articles without consensus, openly taking advantage of my 48 hour block, will not be seen in good taste as it was clearly an opportunistic move, but a very stupid one which I don't take lightly. WP:BURO and WP:IAR applies here. We don't need strict reliable sourcing for a category as all those actors have an IMDB page, the majority of those IMDB pages are accurate, and if the category aims to improve wiki by indexing all the actors of that genre, it is for the better. To filter out those which lack a reliable source lacks NPOV because there are dozens of categories which make statements about things and people which don't have strong sourcing. But in this case, knowing an actor was a Western TV actor is hardly controversial. If MarnetteD reverts a single page he should be prepared to back it up with something other than WP:DEFINING, which is a guideline, not policy, but so far as ``if the characteristic would not be appropriate to mention in the lead portion of an article, it is probably not defining`` goes, there are considerably more articles that don't follow that ideal to the letter than do, which makes it a weak guideline to attempt to enforce unless an editor has a strong motive to do so. If he enjoys attention and drama, I expect to see him an ANI/EW before the week's out. `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,376,538
|
== Titanfall == I undid your recent edit to Titanfall, because it clearly ignored the hidden comments that were removed in the process. Unless there is some consensus I'm not aware of, this edit shouldn't have been performed without first discussing the matter on the article's talk page.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
614,390,667
|
` == War editing persists == I hope you can take the time to look over s fresh batch of childish reverts, his dismissal of WP:IAR despite the big ``Ignore All Rules`` image in his own talk page – I heard ``what's good for the goose is good for the gander``, oh, except when it's an autocratic editor preaching his POV to an IP editor. Clearly his past blocks for 3RR and warring did no sodding good. `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,393,948
|
`::Yes, indeed, but I can change IP just by rebooting my modem after an ipconfig/release in C-prompt if I so wish it. You'd either have to sock or sit out a block whereas I can either wait as long as the block or not at all, depends on how log it is and when I want to edit; no website can block visitors effectively if you're savvy enough. Even better, my ISP can jumps range when you do that, so rangeblocks are useless. One of life's little bonuses of being anonymous is that IPs are like stars, there are billions of them, mostly unnamed. I guess that's why you favour ``mandatory registration`` which explains a lot in terms of your attitude and resentment when IPs edit articles on your watchlist. You revert anon-edits quicker than my pulse beats. ;) ~~~~ `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,398,706
|
n i g g e r f a g g o t
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,399,778
|
homosexuals are all pedophiles.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,400,747
|
im gonna guess you are the same bigoted non normal that wrote this hate page in the first place. you and your gay friends are all pedophiles.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,400,833
|
very crocker sucks n e g r o c o c k s i n h e l l
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
614,405,116
|
:: Thanks, but what about the needless duplication below? how about combining the account of the release and rearrest succinctly? I suspect this will be resolved quickly anyway fairly soon.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,405,293
|
Do you think if I made a Game namedrop list I could make a page for it
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,407,510
|
== Mobile version / resolution on tablet with higher resolution than most desktops / laptops == If Wikipedia doesn't get its act together and stop delivering a mobile version of pages to devices which are more capable then most desktops / laptops of handling high resolution, i.e. desktop, layouts they can take their poxy 'encyclopeaedia' and stick up their poxy rear entry point.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,408,485
|
:If Wikipedia were better designed there would be a more user-friendly, context-sensitive route to providing feedback. Unfortunately we have to make the best of the current design, with all its faults. I suggest you reflex upon how you might influence the design to reduce the problems which seem to offend you.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,409,177
|
so do it anyway is what you're saying
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,409,692
|
::: The 'desire' for users to navigate the vagaries of he Wikipedia UI is all yours, as is the ensuing discomfort. Users will use systems in the most user-efficient way. If this does not coincidd with the desires of those who feel a sense of ownership for the system they are best served by taking up the responsible UI issues with their designers - the responsible party - rather than the users - the 'victims' of poor design.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,415,844
|
` == Reading comprehension issue == To: [..]federal trustbusters began their long, eventually futile attempt to break up Morgan and Schwab's creation. [..] New competitors, including a company run by Schwab, quickly diminished the company's market dominance. [..] A hundred years after it controlled two-thirds of the domestic market, U.S. Steel shipments account for about 8 percent of U.S. consumption. Source: ``Steel Standing: U.S. Steel celebrates 100 years`` For anybody but a cretin with reading comprehension issues, the above would constiute a valid citation supporting this article excerpt: The federal government attempted to use federal antitrust laws to break up U.S. Steel in 1911, but that effort ultimately failed. Time and competitors have, however, accomplished nearly the same thing: In its first full year of operation, U.S. Steel made 67 percent of all the steel produced in the United States. One hundred years later, its shipments accounted for only about 8 percent of domestic consumption.[..]`
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,419,443
|
If you are asserting ownership of the article, then do the work yourself. Otherwise leave it for the bloody link rot team of 4 or 5 guys to fix. You don't have a bloody clue about the workings of link rot at Wikipedia, do you? I thought not. Typical.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,440,934
|
` :Administrators are expected to follow up, and you don't get to pick and choose. You evaded the block imposed at . `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,476,384
|
Oh look. They all aired. What a surprise. Give it a year, and it'll be the SAME THING. O
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,484,707
|
` == Requesting edit from confirmed user == The sentence, ``this is the third time in last 11 drafts that they will make the first overall pick`` in the introduction should read ``fourth time in the last 12 drafts``. The source in question is implying that Cleveland had the top pick three times in the 11 drafts preceding 2014. Therefore, in 2014 they will make the first pick for the fourth time since 2003. These pages can be visited for verification: 2003 NBA draft, 2011 NBA draft, and 2013 NBA draft.`
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,485,799
|
:Am I bovvered?
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
614,485,864
|
2014 (UTC) :::Look at that. It didn't change day. 09:48, 26 June
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,486,058
|
Well, that's poppy. The Continuum issue on my talk page said he didn't need a source. And a lot is assumed. Oh, and TBBT is possibly one of the only shows that disallows the 20xx-20xy tag before it's aired.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
614,495,736
|
::::::::::::I accept that discussing every edit on Wikipedia would be futile - some edits are merely for spelling and grammar, others to add and update information on the given topic. It's a matter of scale, and on this occasion the scale of the change is such that it warranted discussion first. As for the time between the changes being made and said changes being questioned, it again comes down to how often the page is frequented, as well as whether people choose to speak up to voice their opinion or avoid the issue so as not to make a fuss. However, the issue now is not whose daddy is bigger, but what needs to be done to improve the layout of the page to suit as many people as possible. I've no doubt there are several people who prefer the layout you implemented; likewise, there will be many who prefer the prior layout. So, how best to combine the two?
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,514,590
|
==History of Palestine national football team== We should show both viewpoints and matches claimed to be the first internationals played by Palestine or Israel in 1934 and 1953 if we want to be righteous and give a civilized image for Wikipedia. Note that the British mandate used the term Palestine predominately (not Israel). I as a Palestinian try and wants to be neutral as much as I can, however when it comes to stealing my country's sport history, I became very angry and I feel injustice. According to many sources, a part of them says that Palestine came to existence in football for the first in 1928 and played vs Egypt in the World Cup Qualification, and the other part says that the Palestinian Football Association was inherited by the Israeli one in 1948. We can not be 100% sure which part is right so that requires to follow both parties to not disappoint any people from Palestine and Israel as well as avoiding editing wars that have occurred in the past. ;Sources *A History of Palestine From the Ottoman Conquest to the Founding of The State of Israel by Gudrun Krämer *Sports around the World: History, Culture, and Practice by John Nauright and Charles Parrish
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,526,831
|
` ::::Cretins are too stupid to understand that the usual remedy effected by antitrust litigation is to curtail or break up a market participant's dominant, anti-competitive market position. Cretins are too stupid to understand that a reduction, over time, from 67% to 8% of a particular market participant's share of the US steel market is, in effect, a significant whittling of said market participant's dominance. Cretins are too stupid to understand that this is thus ``nearly the same effect`` as a successful antitrust enforcement. Cretins are too inept to realize that they lack even a basic understanding of relevant economic and legal issues, as well as simple English language reading comprehension skills, to be able to meaningfully ``edit`` sentences pertaining to the subject. `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,530,020
|
:I have seen your post now but I replaced the pop punk reference which was there again with rock a few days before.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,537,285
|
` == RE: Metamodernism == The large portions I cut had all failed to meet WP:RS as the only citations cited were personal blogs (a few of which were just default-wordpress-theme, abandoned over a year ago kind of blogs). It seems as though the page in question is being maintained by the owners of metamodernism.com, which was (and may still be) the most cited source on the page (which, once more, in no way passes WP:RS), thus provokes other issues with WP:NOTADVERTISING, WP:COI, etc. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,539,512
|
`Hello, NewYouShow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: * Introduction and Getting started * Contributing to Wikipedia * The five pillars of Wikipedia * How to edit a page and How to develop articles * How to create your first article * Simplified Manual of Style Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place before the question. Again, welcome! `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,540,816
|
`**FYI, the bolding is per Wikipedia:BOLDTITLE, **Your earlier edit bolded the entire fucking paragraph; that is what I was trying to correct before, unable to do it, I simply removed the bolding until it could be done correctly. ***Didn't realize it did that. Sorry, but I didn't mean to offend, *The ``colorful euphemism`` was describing the entirety of the paragraph, not you. Sorry. ) **It's okay, I assumed it wasn't ill intention-ed P `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
614,543,295
|
ALBANIA ALBANI ALBANIA ===== ALBANIA ==== =ALBANI ALBANI ALBANI ALBANIA ALBANIA ALBANI ALBANI ALBANI ALBANIA →→→→→→→→→→→→→→→→→→ALBANIA←←←←←←←←←←←←←←←←←←← ALBANIA~~
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
614,547,117
|
Such a friendly, helpful and encouraging person )
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,553,772
|
` ::The issue wasn't that the information was unsourced, it was that everything I had removed used a personal blog (most likely added to the article by the owner of said site) as a source. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,556,360
|
` == Health Issues == ==Is the National Inquirer considered a valid source on Wiki?? On May 28, 2014, The National Enquirer reported that James Garner's health was failing rapidly and that he was battling severe depression in addition to the aftermath of his previous strokes. The article cited a source claiming that Garner had been scheduled to make a cameo appearance in a Rockford Files remake, starring Vince Vaughn, but that Garner was ``too ill to take part in the show```` and that Garner felt he had ``nothing left to live for``. Just asking. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,569,808
|
` == You suck == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Dick Award |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I HATE YOU |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,569,923
|
` == The Dick == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The DickHead Award |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | BOOOOOOO |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,577,155
|
== Adding Alexander Rusev in the infobox? == I was just wondering if we could change the infobox, not by much though but simply to add in Alexander Rusev, professional wrestler, only Bulgaria into the WWE? PacificWarrior101
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
614,577,892
|
== Adding Vladimir Kozlov in the infobox? == We only have one athlete (Vitali Klitschko). I really think we should put back Andriy Shevchenko and in addition, put professional wrestler Vladimir Kozlov (real name is Oleg Prudius) in the infobox. PacificWarrior101
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
614,580,954
|
: also see past discussion at Talk:Variator_(variable_valve_timing)
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,589,424
|
` == ban NOW == this user blocked me 1.6756 monthes ago and he desevrs to be band. ban him forever — Preceding unsigned comment added by `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,597,333
|
` == Hi == Here on Wikipedia, everyone is expected to be polite. Unfortunately, I noticed that a comment you posted wasn't very nice. You are allowed to criticize editors constructively, but please remember to still be friendly. Wikipedia would appreciate it. Thanks. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,597,474
|
:. I reverted the vandal that removed the Spanish Empire. About the other problems, I agree with you, but I have no sources to correct the data. Maybe you could do it, if you have reliable sources.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
614,597,841
|
` :Can you please detail how I broke the policies in question? Also note that COI and SPI override ``outing``. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,624,260
|
:::That is supposedly. However this article's content and Devdutt article s are very similar. And that is not just because they both are about Ashokasundari. The way these two articles is written is very similar. Also remember that a web portal sources its information from various sources even the news. Also you should know that 's article also appeared in Times of India. Should we use that as a source just because it appeared in a news website? Obviously not. All information must be verified. If you think that a folk tale about a god or a goddess can't appear in a book then think again.Vishnu maya is not mentioned in any scripture. His origins too are folk legends however the source I have used on his article clearly mentions he is a non Sanskritic deity. Also there is a folk tale about Shiva dancing nude to make Kali run away from a forest. However it is mentioned in a book that I read on Google. I am not at all against adding information about Ashokasundari to her article I actually in support of it. However the information should be first proved reliable and true without a doubt. Besides I think it is not such a big deal that the thing about the folk tale can't be added ,even if might be true (which is unlikely). Actually believe me it's not even that much important since the main reason behind creating Ashokasundari article was to prove that there did exist a daughter of Shiva and being able to prove just that is a big achievement in itself.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
614,640,158
|
::::I think The Tick is a different kind of superhero (or maybe not). BTW, you were highly praised here (there is praise there amongst all the stone throwing and mud flinging)
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,644,523
|
== Taxonomic rank == Taxonomic rank is always indicated in botanical names; unlike in zoology there are several infraspecific ranks (subspecies, variety, forma).
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,653,585
|
:::::: So because the name is CAN bus, we should call it controller area network? Typical wikipedia.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,660,977
|
` == This is the last time I am going to tell you: Stop vandalising and stop disturbing me == Family names are a valid article. Each family name in every language can be an article. Instead of your Serbophobic (and therefore racist, since you are apparently Korean, at least that is what you claim) vandalism edits, go and do something useful like making wiki articles for Korean family names. Most certainly do not ever again take the liberty to tell me what to do, because you have neither right nor authority to do that and your snotty and inappropriate comments are unwelcome. Eventually, as I have already replied at the ludicrous discussion you started where, BTW, no one took your side I will create longer pages for each individual family name when I have time. They will be full articles in their own right. For now, leave the Serbian family names alone and do not input vandalism redirects to specific people. People are people and they have their own article and names are names and they have their own articles AS NAMES, not as incidental necessity for redirection. Further your comparison with the family name ``Hitler`` is absolutely abhorrent, as all people who had that family name have changed it after WW II, so that family name does indeed relate to only a signe person. And even so, it would still be possible to write an article about the family name as such, but it's not my interest, so I won't do it. However, writing such an article would be legitimate and such an article could exist as a wikipedia article. On the links that you have been posting on my page (and which I am going to delete, because they are unnecessary on may talk page) it says VERY CLEARLY: ``MAY`` and NOT ``MUST``. Are you really incapable of comprehending the difference between the two? If you are, stop editing Wikipedia altogether because all your edits are likely to be violation of rules. And, I repeat: do not come to scribble nonsense on my wall again. I have nothing to tell you that I haven't told you three times already and I do not want your inconsequential silly musings on my wall. Go away!! `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,663,070
|
== Verifiable sources for Desiccated Thyroid Extract article == Hi, I noticed you contributed to the Desiccated Thyroid Extract article. I am working on improving it for readability and usefulness. I am having a difficult time finding a verifiable source for the drug ingredients of all three brands (Westhroid, Naturethroid, and Armour Thyroid) of desiccated thyroid extract. In your opinion, would information from RLC Labs (the makers of Westhroid and Naturethroid) be considered a verifiable source? Your feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, if you do not have time, could you refer a few users that I may ask? Thank you!
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,668,139
|
== socking D62943 == Part of what makes for a confusing case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D62943 is the bicoastal activity of the accounts. The original D62943 grouping appears to be based in New Jersey while the Geoffrey100 grouping appears to be based in the San Francisco Bay Area. The topics of interest include TV and (mostly) radio stations, shopping malls or retail districts, and various Chinese-related topics. can probably offer some insight, having early experience with the socks.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,674,715
|
== On good articles. == I currently have Rape during the Rwandan Genocide up for GA status, but the reviewer has dropped off the dace of wikipedia. Last comment on the review was 27 April 2014, and has not edited since 3 June 2014. I asked on the GA help desk what should I do but have had no response. Do you know of anyone who might finish the review? BTW, Moosezilla, scary. Tenner the Scofi channel make a movie on it, gotta be better than Sharknado
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,695,219
|
:Or you can use the and templates which are designed for this purpose. Thanks,
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,710,133
|
:::::Of greater concern than splitting this article is the fact that the article currently has only four secondary sources, one of which (bibletopics.com) most likley fails the criteria for reliable sources.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
614,728,216
|
` ::That's better. TLA → `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,741,199
|
==Art Below== You are welcome to join a discussion about the article Art Below, at Talk:Art Below.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,780,190
|
Ekgograf and his son of bitch of gang of dumb, n*zi , and are the greatest batard that ever walk on earth !!!!!
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
614,780,796
|
== Promotion to Lieutenant Colonel == Pajovic (1977, page 472) explains that King Peter promoted PD to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, based on the proposal of DM, shortly before Nedic promoted PD to the same rank.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
614,785,780
|
::::::::Thanks for your messages and for taking the time to reply. Cheers. |
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,794,896
|
I never edit on wikipedia!!!!! What the f*ck are you doing , Bbb23 , you s*n of b*ch of b*stard
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
614,805,154
|
(racehorse trainer)|James Bethell
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,809,773
|
== Yo whatever I have on my shit leave it alone == - Deadass I deleted every fucking this cause you stay deleting someone shit like niggah damn go suck a dick talking about he has this all over the place niggah mind your business on what I have on my shit cause I ain't editing nothing on your shit.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
614,810,963
|
== you will be reported as a racist == : you are obviously a bigoted racist, as you have not removed the page for Gordon (name) which is an article about a name. Yet you are removing articles about names of people from a nation you clearly have something against. : But it does not surprise me, at all. Most people who deal with IT are of a limited intellectual capacity, especially when it copmes to evaluating their own shortcomings (cf. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/kateconnolly/3637231/Are_you_a_Fachidiot/ ), and even more so when they have not actually graduated from a university but are self-taugt like you appear to be. : In any case, your blatant Serbophobia in removing start up articles about the names of a culture that you disparage is a disgrace to Wikipedia in English. : BTW, I deleted the nonsense you posted on my talk page. Do not do that ever again. It is unwanted and unacceptable. I will not be posting here any more either, and I will report you to Meta Wiki as a racist unfit to work on the site.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
614,841,935
|
` According to google ``Liebe meine Apschminki!`` means Love my make-up remover. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,842,100
|
== Please refrain from unfounded accusations == I did not vandalize any page. I correctly pointed out that there was no citations for what was posted as opposed to what had been there before. I do not appreciate your rudeness nor your accusations.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,852,426
|
` : Honestly, I am quite sure anyone with a sound mind and good intentions would most definitely not consider a statement of facts (Serbophobia, detailed and explained) a ``personal attack``.`
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,852,466
|
== Why are British colonisers referred to as 'European'? == Can anyone point to a reason why the first fleet should be treated as 'European' settlement of Australia - were there any reasonably significant number of non-British people involved in it? From other reading, I see 'European' being used to legitimize a British colony established on the continent - which to date has had very little European about it (no more than a few Dutch or French names and very few actual continental Europeans arriving to Australia until the post WWII period). Architecture and customs of Australia up until WWII are very British with no recognizable European influence in law, cultural norms, organization of the society or political views. In that context it seems misleading to claim that the 'in December 1792, the European population was 4,221, of whom 3,099 were convicts' - when this was really the count of people on the three British fleets arriving to Sydney - presumably a very English affair?
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
614,852,881
|
Read the facts, and check the racist 's behaviour, do not just agree with somenone who is/claims to be an administrator because you are one. Very simple indeed, but does require maturity, not shown here by either or , who chose to condone and collude with racism of . Ah well.... getting tiresome and disgusting, all this business. Will have to change IP. }}
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
614,867,408
|
:I see no warning for , the one that started the warring. Why is this?
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,884,277
|
:::As what he/she, but that IP was probably just you anyways. Semi works.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
614,885,600
|
` :: And finally, I believe you're making a guileful, if rather inept use of the concept of ``original research``. I challenge you to find me reliable sources stating that 3*16=48. If possible, making such fact the center of the article or a relevant part thereof. Same here, with the additional fact that it is the producers and distributors who decide a relevant part of the critics' response to a filmand this is not conspiracy theory, this is basic market dynamics. The plot for Oculus contains the same relevant points as the one for The Boogeyman: :: * two siblings witness the death of their parents/mother's boyfriend at the hands of one of them, and the whole scene is preternaturally captured by a mirror :: * this happens after one of the siblings had been chained/tied up in their bedroom by the victims, then freed by the other sibling :: * years later the murderous sibling (in both cases the brother) is still psychologically scarred by the event :: * and murders and unnatural phenomena arising from the ghost-catching mirror and its shards ensue. :: Do I need sources to see a pattern? This is like calling the film a ``horror film`` without a source. Would you refrain from calling it so even if no source did? Would it be ``original research``? Come on. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.