dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
626,419,102	`Dear Huon, Is not giving accurate information on the Infobox official language of the African Union, as the AU has no 4 working languages, African Union has 6 official languages and ``any African language.`` Either are official languages may be used as a working language. Here is a video from Youtube where it takes place in one of the Summit of the African Union, the announcement of the formalization of the Spanish in the organization. Wikipedia is not giving accurate information on this issue because a publisher called to change without any real source is allowed, just do not provide any evidence of his claim. Equatorial Guinea President Teodoro Obiang, ``Announces Spanish as Official Language of African Union`` The announcement happened during a press conference on 30 July 2011 immediately following the third day of the 17th Ordinary African Union Summit at the Sipopo International Conference Center on the island of Bata in the Republic of Equatorial Guinea. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXYtVDz29wc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.103.69.206 (talk) `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
626,424,765	==Hasmens Here== Its not the removal of the sections that concerns me, it is the whole notion that the removal was are targeted racially motivated act on behalf of Dr.K. Dr.K's comment on GiorgosY user account clearly is evident of his nature, this is the exact remark he made; note that this user is now banned from repeated disruption and violation on wikipedia. On the other hand I feel that Admin Diana is possibly abusing there admin role. The nature that this was dealt with wasn't very positive nor constructive, nor was it neutral in any nature. I also noticed that sections that were not added by me were also removed leaving the article on Northern Cyprus in a terrible un-repaired state. I would like to foward this I don't believe that Admin Diana has acted in an appropriate nature when dealing with this issue, I am aware that the sections were copyright but the nature in which it was dealt was wrong. This is not what Wikipedia should be about. I was not aware of the copyright issues as I was still new to editing on Wikipedia and still learning, if I were to put the information into my own words Dr.K still disapproved of my edits by saying there not well sourced when they were clearly taking from books written by historians. Even if I were to provide more than one source he would still disprove, it seems the truth has disturbed this fellow Wikipedia user, if am not aloud to write well sourced truths, than my time on editing Wikipedia an even reading Wikipedia articles will be over. The level of inaccuracy and bias articles seen on Wikipedia will in future lead this site to losing much of its popularity and legitimacy as it already is declining. Good Day. ( )	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,429,380	== Insecurity? == Andythegrump, There are deeply insecure people who try to mask there insecurity by rudeness. They are usually not capable of hearing contrary voices and respond to the by rude noises! I am sure that you are not one of these insecure folks... are you? It will be a good idea for you to cool down!!! Take care.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
626,434,610	:*Its not very professional of you to insult my language EdJohnston. English is indeed my first language. ( )	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,439,569	== FFS What am I doing wrong? == I'm trying to help sort better information here and it seems as if you hate and dissagree with me here. What is wrong with it? Can you please explain. I'm not vandalizing or ruining pages.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
626,454,691	*Oppose. I fully agree with Montanabw. In Britain polled tends to mean naturally polled. Other cattle are referred to as dehorned or disbudded when horns have been removed. This can all be covered on one page.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
626,475,487	== Your blog == I'm sorry, but we don't use personal blogs as sources or as external links, see WP:EL. Also please read conflict of interest. Thanks.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
626,477,078	I am sad to see you leave. You are one of the most valuable people on this project. With the many amazing things you have done for wikipedia. To only get a double slap in the face of two administrators. For the reason I do not like your style and attitude with me. So I will slap you. Why? Because I can. Instead of thinking hey this an editor with over 150k edits, 7 years of experience, and held in high regard by the community. maybe we should talk this through a bit more and in the end maybe even agree to disagree. I might leave as well if admins can do this without consequences.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
626,485,575	No, I do agree with , he is excellent. And you, , you might have something wrong with understanding others and expressing yourself. Are you retired? Why are you so active always? What such a retired and inactive editor could have made me experience blocked for 24 hours? I do appreciate with you so much, and this is the nice sarcasm for you, .	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
626,489,554	Sorry for some of my ignorant behavior and the inconvenience I caused, I'm not that good with some resources like that Jersey Club one, I had a couple of references there but I guess I should of looked more into it and add more references along the way. I'll try to keep that in mind next time. Thanks.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
626,495,194	Junge Dame beim Anlegen einer Perlenkette .. nothing here either]]	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
626,505,200	` :::So... Can we add a citation next to the quote ``virulent campaign`` without people getting angry/insta-revert? `	2,014	false	article	random	test	false
626,549,309	::: And Codename Lisa that would have been relevant had I realized that was actually an Administrator but there is no indication on his Talkpage that was true at the time or even now for that matter. But thanks...	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,608,548	== Infobox == Why shouldn't this article have an infobox? I have been reverted twice now with no reason what so ever. Please, do explain!	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
626,610,891	==Hasmens== Dr.K I think your ridiculous remarks to me prove that I have been wasting my time especially calling me a troll proves to me how immature you are. You are in a very wrong place maybe someday you will find your way. Dr.K you need to see a real Dr.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
626,615,017	== GTX 960 is launching next moth, does EXIST and STOP MESSAGING PEOPLE IF YOU'RE THAT CLUELESS == If you don't know the GTX 960 does exist and is launching in October, STOP MESSAGING PEOPLE, clueless moron that doesn't know how to use Google to search for information.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
626,620,677	::Thank you Phil, The problem is a bit more serious. I have two editors who did not have sources for claiming a link between religion and ethnicity in Galicia. I had authority to the contrary, so I deleted it, but added commentary on the talk page with the sources. They said something was true without sources or discussion and demanded that I prove that it wasn't. No compromise is possible with these people. Things have now escalated to the OR page. I have also noticed a violation of the Wiki naming policy for ethnic groups and self-identification, as these editors continue to refer to Carpo-Rusyns as Ukrainians. Since Carpo-Rusyns find it offensive to be labeled Ukrianians, I have left a warning on one editors talk page and on the Galicia talk page. Should I report this somewhere else? This guy doesn't care who he is offending with his behavior.	2,014	false	user	random	train	false
626,621,871	Can someone add the URL to the ANSI standard ? Many thanks -	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
626,624,534	== IRS message == Hello there. This is the IRS. You owe us $25,000 in unpaid taxes. Kristina at IRS http://www.irs.gov.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
626,624,742	`Notice of rebooted discussion == I have started a new discussion on the ``No personal attacks`` policy page. Since this is (still) an issue of civility, and the subject of much debate here and elsewhere on the project, watchers of this page are invited to participate. ``Avoiding personal attacks``. Sincerely. == `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
626,624,871	== Explanation == My revdeleted comment was a bad-tempered response to a deliberately needling statement from someone who has a bit of history when it comes to doling out such statements. I explained this when contacted by on Sunday, in my message to him at 10:32 UTC. I emphasised that my words were figurative and in the context of what had been said by the other contributor. I also asked Philippe to reassure that contributor of various things, including that I know nothing about them, that I neither have nor have access to any weapons beyond the sort of thing usually found in a UK home, and that there was no intent to do anything in particular except leave in utter frustration of the bad faith etc flying around. I assume that message had been passed on by around 19:55 UTC latest, which is when Philippe replied to me. I haven't looked at Wikipedia since that bad-tempered retort and would not have looked at it now if it were not for someone asking me to post some sort of comment. I'm not reading through the stuff above, nor looking at the ANI thread that I'm told was opened. Until certain things happen, some on-wiki and some involving an issue that the WMF are looking at off-wiki, I'm gone from here. I'm pretty sure that those certain things will happen but I doubt that they will do so soon, and it may be that I decide not to return anyway. Frankly - and I know this will seem arrogant - that would be Wikipedia's loss, not mine. If/when I do return, I'll be notifying quite a few people that I would rather they stayed away from my talk page, which is something I've always been reluctant to do in the past. I'm fed up of lynch mobs and gangs here, so anything that helps to reduce the baiting is A Good Thing. As a rule of thumb, if you've baited in the past, you can assume that you'll be on the list because, although often I do not publicly support him, that seems to be the common denominator among those who bait me. The gang can go elsewhere, while I hope that Eric and myself will continue to agree/agree to differ as and when appropriate and in an adult manner. We can get on with improving content; the baiters can carry on doing whatever it is they want to do elsewhere. My thanks to everyone who has contacted me. It was just a bad-tempered response: I'm perfectly happy in life, if slightly miffed at the increased distances I'm having to travel due to some unfortunate Wiki-related events. -	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
626,625,018	== IRS notice == Hello there, this is the IRS. You owe us $19,000 in unpaid taxes. Kristina Gonzalez, Inland Revenue Service http://www.irs.gov.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
626,625,252	== IRS notice == You owe unpaid taxes to the IRS. Please talk to your local office within 90 days or action will be taken. Kristina Gonzalez, Inland Revenue Service http://www.irs.gov	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
626,625,549	== IRS notice == Please do not revert our page. The IRS owns that talk page. We use this IP address, even if Crissic own it. Kristina Gonzalez Inland Revenue Service, http://www.irs.gov	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
626,629,687	ATTENTION JD WOLF, Too much fanfare? Bull_Sh!!!!!!!!!! http://brainimmune.com/andor-szentivanyi-and-the-beta-adrenergic-theory-of-allergy-and-asthma/	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	true
626,631,145	(ie: their identity etc)	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,673,854	` *Oppose I was originally in favor of inclusion, but the more that I've thought about, the more I believe that it is WP:UNDUE weight. There are literally thousands and thousands of articles about this topic. Not every little tidbit should be in the article. If this was something important, then you would see a lot more sources covering. The fact that this has gotten very little attention by reliable sources is a strong indication of its importance. Aside from the WP:UNDUE, I'm concerned about the sourcing. The two sources being cited appear to be opinion pieces, not straight news reporting. WP:BLP says to ``Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources``. I don't see how this meets the tough sourcing requirements set forth by BLP. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
626,674,082	:::::No rush checking out the platform at the HTC. I just thought of a few more locations that could use pictures at some stage - the transfer stations and the last active freight siding on the Cape at the power plant in Sagamore. I'm sure that there are remnants of a few stations around that could be photographed too, like in Sagamore. (you can see the foundation of the old station on Google Maps.)	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
626,683,730	` == Batta is used for kashmiri hindus == The non-muslims (hindus by default in modern sense) in kashmir valley especially brahmins were historically and still called ``Batta`` in kashmir valley as the word ``hindu`` was unknown to kashmiris. It is only in recent times that kashmiri batta (brahmins) have started calling themselves hindus something which they always detested. I never knew that Batta are also found in punjab and many khatris are derived from Batta caste, surprising and interesting.`	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
626,692,779	== Semi-protected edit request on 22 September 2014 == tomatoe potato ketchup onion awesome I like budder don't you knowḞỮ	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
626,699,425	== Hey donkey == Hey donkey, its your uncle.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
626,711,998	:Yeah that looks like her. My two cents is that she was blonde when she was interviewed in the source cited, and also appears to be so in the video you linked, and that's how they describe her. However, you and I just looking at her image and saying she is a brunette would be considered original research here on Wikipedia. It may seem strange but the source that's cited does describe her has a blonde, and unless another source can be found that explicitly says she is a brunette, we have to use what the sources give us.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
626,713,061	` ==Unsupported Edit== There is an unsubstantiated edit by 71.236.6.189, dating from July 1, 2012. It has no known reference and yet is very detailed in its description. Does this ``editing contribution`` to Wikipedia stay or go, since it is seemingly conjecture at its best? The user has never returned to Wikipedia, so it doesn't appear that anyone can ask them about it or its source... `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
626,717,257	:: Best response ever ◔̯◔	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
626,762,420	: The appropriate instruction is at WP:USER#Non-free images: if a non-free image appears on a sandbox page, for example , the image is to be removed from the page immediately. If you continue to add non-free images to sandbox pages, you may be blocked from editing.	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
626,783,513	Discospinster, what constitutes the criteria for deleting a company page? Why does hourlynerd get to keep its page up while other startups have to take theirs down? Seems ridiculous and subjective. Gorley	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
626,783,634	Mr. Wolf, We need to have a serious talk about Asthma. Have you done any reading about ASTHMA? The Beta Adrenergic Theory is the ONLY Theory of Asthma that can be associated with one name {not including crackpots} so your question about other names insults my intelligence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not only that but in contrast to other theories this one has been cited more than any other article in the history of the Journal of Allergy according to the GARFIELED LIBRARY at The University of Pennsylvania. Last but not least, my comment would be out of place in the history section because it relates DIRECTLY to the BA2 polymorphism. Since other polymorphisms CANNOT be related to a specific theory, much less to a specific individual, your comment doesn't make any sense.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,786,309	` == ``relaxed abortion laws``? == Actually, he voted against what eventually became the 1967 Abortion Act: http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1966/jul/22/medical-termination-of-pregnancy-bill#S5CV0732P0_19660722_HOC_74 And later, in 1985, he introduced the unsuccessful Unborn Children (Protection) Bill, which would among other things have defined life as beginning at conception. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
626,817,393	== Dodoma Region DYK == Hey Cwmhiraeth! Thanks for the review. I've added an inline citation as requested. Could you take another look at it please? Cheers! —	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,823,182	I get the feeing you are NOT a physician. I did NOT give you a personal website. I gave you a webpage with a review written by a world renowned immunologist. I gave you SCHOLARLY references to show the link between BA2 and The Beta Adrenergic Theory of Asthma. I am concerned that an editor of Wikipedia knows absolutely nothing about what he is editing. Nobody is asking your opinion about The Beta Adrenergic Theory but instead I am pointing there is no other theory of that can identified with a specific individual {aside from crackpots}.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
626,854,929	` == Summary of Unrest in Lede == This phrase in the lede - ``and in which the use of militarized police was drastically reduced`` - appears to be an editorial comment unsupported by the RS in the body of the article. What is ``militarized police`` and how was subsequent policing not ``militarized police?`` There either needs to be an objective definition, or a RS needs to be presented that - while not providing a definition - at least supports that unambiguous statement. I've made a WP:BOLD edit. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
626,865,600	` :Unfortunately, even if an article has been touched by the hand of ``god``—whichever one you wish to believe in—if unverified content is included, then it needs to be highlighted. While appearance is relevant, Wikipedia is not merely a design forum, or an example of aesthetic excellence—it is an encyclopedic website that seeks to contain verifiable information. The importance of tags is so that copyeditors can easily identify the sections that need to be verified—it is also important that readers know when content is not verified. Yes, I could have sourced the information myself, but given that I am only one person, with finite energy and time, I feel that it is beneficial to highlight gaps in the article while I attend to the multiple other priorities in my life—this also provides other copyeditors with an opportunity to improve the article until I return to the article. I have restored the template, as it is still relevant. Thanks. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
626,895,833	` == Martine Rothblatt's wife Beverlee ``Bina Aspen`` Prator - source == A connected contributor, , has reverted for no legitimate reason and deleted valid source(s). deleted that Bina's real name is Beverlee (see source below), and IP has done the same thing. * ``The Rothblatts, now married, legally adopted each other’s children, and would soon have two more. Bina started her conversion to Judaism (her given name is actually Beverlee).`` http://nymag.com/news/features/martine-rothblatt-transgender-ceo/index2.html * ``Bina, who is African-American, grew up in Compton and was working as a real-estate agent. http://nymag.com/news/features/martine-rothblatt-transgender-ceo/index1.html * Beverlee Prator with Martine Rothblatt, September 9, 2014: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/beverlee-prator-and-martine-rothblatt-arrive-to-new-york-news-photo/455114476 `	2,014	false	article	random	dev	false
626,901,808	}} {{WikiProject Record Labels\| class = \|importance=	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
626,912,844	` :It appears to be no more a genuine ``museum`` than a souvenir shop selling or displaying reproductions or facsimiles of objects in other museums would be a ``museum``. That is not to say it is not notable enough for an article - but let's set aside its ``museum`` status (maybe call it something less specific, like a ``gallery``). `	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
626,915,715	`== Titles of articles == For your information, see Talk:Swiss popular initiative ``Against mass immigration``#Requested moves. .`	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
626,920,422	` What you've been told seems to be erroneous. See Category:Reggae rock songs for example, which features reggae rock songs by artists whose main genre is not reggae rock (eg The Clash). Also ``hlists`` are more readable than ``flatlists`` and exactly work the same way. So there's no reason to change one template for another one... Finally adding ``hard rock`` within buddling references is useless if the references are next to the sourced material. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,926,354	` == On the way forward: consider this before posting here == I would much prefer it if certain people did not post on this page. So, before posting please consider whether you might be described as a tendentious canvasser or drama seeker, mischief-maker, advocate, misrepresenter, someone who piles on without clue, or someone carrying over ``by association`` the disputes that they have with contributors elsewhere. If you might fall into one or more of those categories and still think it necessary to pass comment here then please try to find an admin to do that for you (and if you are an admin - Chillum comes to mind - then find another). I'm not keen on this because it restricts collaboration but, hey, people like that basically just seem to vent, poke or offer weird ``advice`` when I am the subject of their attention. I'm human, not a saint; while my ability to tolerate the types described above is not bad, it is also not infinite. I'd be pleased if the time that you would have spent here is expended instead on editing India-related articles. But bear in mind that you will need to be able to: deal knowledgeably with touchy and repetitively-raised issues such as Hindutva-, religious- and caste-related POV-pushing handle completely clueless newbies on a large scale, many of them encouraged to edit by an ill-considered WMF initiative handle often large-scale sock- and meat-farms, and masses of copyvio and BLP violations take copious amounts of general abuse pretty much daily *face all sorts of physical and legal threats, both on- and off-wiki, as well as real-life stalking over prolonged periods by multiple people All with little or no support from the WMF and large swathes of the community who are more interested in the never-ending tendentious discussion of ``meta`` issues - among them policy, ``honor``, and the creation of a Wikitopia - than actually improving content where it matters most. And when you need a break from articles that relate to 20 per cent of the world's population and which suffer grossly from bias, systemic and otherwise, go chill by creating a GA or at least a B-class article more or less single-handed. Do all of this and you'll make me a very happy (and surprised) man. Do it for 130k-ish edits without getting blocked, on spurious grounds or otherwise, then you'll be really quite remarkable. I'm not saying that I will be back but if I do return, I'd rather not see stuff here from the types of people described above. Thanks. - `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,936,568	` ::::::It's not only ``too long`` it's also an opinionated attack creation, this version was outrageous and should never have been published - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alessandra_Stanley&diff;=626918992&oldid;=626918428 - I agree with everyone but - `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
626,947,454	::::They'll see your attempt to own the article and your POV-warring. -	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,960,132	If such an editor were to get banned? there'd possibly be a hug push to 'change' Arbcom.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
626,964,145	::I provided an answer to the above link. Now stop restoring all of this !	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
626,968,417	\|in=Kern County, California	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
627,027,129	` == Death of J.E.B. Stuart == == JEB STUART== I cannot find JEB Stuart's staff members listed anywhere in all of Internet. His personal doctor was [Peter ?] Fontaine, son of Col. Edmund Fontaine of ``Beaver Dam``. JEB's death message came to Beaverdam where MRS JEB Stuart was staying with the Edmund Fontaine family. Can anyone assist in finding JEB Stuart's staff officers? Thank you for your consideration and knowledge. `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
627,033,599	DO NOT ERASE MY MESSAGES - This behaviour is infraction with the talk page guidelines as clearly described here Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments ::RESTORED MESSAGE -Thanks for your tips. I'll indeed take it to ANI and I've neutralized the title without completely changing the nature of the topic (which was the purpose of your action). Metropolitan (talk)	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,048,820	== Regarding this article == Respected Sir/Madam, I have corrected [when] from this to this when. Please include his height 5 ft 9 in (1.75m) or (175cm). I will give the reliable link where I have found this information. The link is http://www.lightscamerabollywood.com/bollywood-heroes-heights/.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,054,925	Also I didn't intend doing what you see, but the coversation I've been involved in is not finished and I just wanted to keep all of this the way it was before doing anything else.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,055,151	I promised not removing anything else about me but I just want an oversighter help me dealing with my problems.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
627,055,860	Gov't source says Adra's Old City is still rebel-held	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
627,056,745	` ::I'm perfectly able to edit Wikipedia without any problem at all, but people like the first ones I met clearly refused didn't want to understand and barely helped me. As you can see on this talk page, several editors recognized by good faith edits and I think you should do the same. What you call ``personal attacks`` are not personal attacks. This is exactly the way I've been welcomed to this projects before meeting clever people able to understand I was able to do great things to improve articles. Once again I never inteding attacking anybody around here. That's not my purpose. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
627,056,830	understandng what I was doing	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,057,148	. I'm only looking for some help, that's it. Nothing else. I'm a peaceful editor who spend most of its completing/cleaning up articles	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,057,688	Still not in that one as well.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
627,092,552	== AC/DC == Hi, the members' page has used that format for a number of years, so if you want to suggest changes, please use the talk page, like everyone else does. Also, it is not true that any of those former members were temporary. All were considered permanent at the time, according to the sources. One that is not clear is Paul Matters, who is currently listed as a temporary member. I don't think it's appropriate to list someone like Laughlin, who stood in for Evans at a few gigs, next to someone like Bon Scott. Cheers, :I don't agree with any of your arguments! This idea is to match with the timeline... No need to talk about it much longer... Time for changes has come! Please respect my edit which is simply logical and... much better!	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,093,543	== Repeated Abuse! == Repeat abuse and not look. Closing.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
627,096,370	== Title section revert == Hi, I was at the office earlier and I hadn't noticed your warning before restoring the title of the section. I'm sorry for that. Of course I won't do such a revert again. Just to clarify, I've opened a new section to indeed alert some contributors that they were behaving in a way in line with the examples of ownership behaviour as described here. In return the title of the section has been twisted to something unrelated and one of my message has been erased. It is the first time I see people editing other's signed contributions in a talk page. This just looks crazy to me.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
627,100,751	` == What is this supposed to mean? As far away from POV-neutral as one can imagine… == ``After McQuaid was buried under the High Altar in Dublin's Pro-Cathedral, he was quickly forgotten, as his successors struggled, unsuccessfully in the end, to fend off what became known as 'the liberal agenda'.`` That is really how the article ends at present. What a joke. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,101,799	`:: If so, then can you explain me why the Tour Montparnasse markets itself in its own advertisement as offering ``the most beautiful view of Paris`` illustrated by a picture offering the exact same angle on the Eiffel Tower: ::* Advertisement #1 ``the most beautiful view of Paris`` ::* Advertisement #2 ``the most beautiful view of Paris`` :: Why would they do so if ``no one considers this image as picturing Paris``, maybe they are bad marketers? And similarly, can you explain me why the official magazine of the City Council of Paris also use an image from the same angle on its cover: ::* Cover of the Paris City Council magazine with as caption ``Paris, attractive capital`` :: I respect your general considerations, but I hardly see how they are relevant to the case. Yours respectfully. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
627,105,321	:: Here is the diff where my message had been erased: -	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,106,469	::Thank you . I'll keep on reviewing them then. )	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
627,116,161	` ==Vandalism?== ``True flies are insects of the order blabla. Did you know that one in every 10 flies is gay, and that gay flies are something. Also female flies carry maggots palindrome.`` Ehhhh.... seems like a bunch of crap to me. Delete it?`	2,014	false	article	random	test	false
627,144,745	: Oppose. This topic has already been the topic of multiple arbitrations in the past, none of which reached consensus on a multiple-picture montage: ::* 2013 arbitration: ::* 2013 request for contributions: ::* 2010 arbitration: ::* 2006 arbitration: ::* 2009 arbitration for the French article: : The 2006, 2009 and 2010 arbitrations reached consensus on the Eiffel Tower single image. The 2013 arbitration reached no consensus for a change, thus confirming that the single image of the Eiffel Tower should be maintained. A decision which was overstepped by in july 2013. Here is a link to the diff -	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
627,147,568	==WP:VG assessment== I'm pleased to say this article is definitely beyond stub-level now, and by my reckoning at the higher end of start-class. The overall structure of the article is in place, and there are a good number of images. My main concern is the size of the Gameplay section, which is completely unreferenced and quite game guide-esque. I would suggest trimming it back to the core essentials and sourcing this from reliable sources - have a look at some example articles for some ideas of how best to go about this. Similarly, the Development section is currently unsourced and quite brief - it could do with some expansion on the history of the development on the game, which I'm sure will be documented somewhere. The Reception section is looking good - add a couple of paragraphs summarising what professional reviewers have said about the game and it'll be great. Overall, if you fix these things then you're looking at a strong C or even B class article. Good luck!	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
627,155,974	` GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Article looks good, I'll go through it section-wise and see if I can find anything - #Is it reasonably well written? #:A. Prose is ``clear and concise``, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: #:: #:B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: #:: #Is it factually accurate and verifiable? #:A. Has an appropriate reference section: #:: #:B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: #:: #:C. No original research: #:: #Is it broad in its coverage? #:A. Major aspects: #:: #:B. Focused: #:: #Is it neutral? #:Fair representation without bias: #:: #Is it stable? #: No edit wars, etc: #:: #Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? #:A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: #:: #:B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: #:: #Overall: #:Pass or Fail: #::`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
627,156,692	: I support this welcome consensual proposal from .	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
627,185,323	::Jxm, I inserted the phrase “purporting to examine” back in January. I believe it is the most appropriate phrasing because: :::1. PEAR only claims to be examining psi, legitimate scientists don’t think that there is any psi to examine. :::2. Even if telekinesis were real, PEAR’s experiments wouldn’t have proven its existence anyway because of their methodological flaws. :::3. The reliable sources seem to be suggesting (though not outright stating) that PEAR was probably involved in deliberate fraud. The fact that one of PEAR’s own staff was an experimental subject who had a significant effect on their results coupled with the fact that PEAR’s results are not reproducible seems to have created some suspicion. ::While I’m not proposing that we add PEAR to one of Wikipedia’s lists of hoaxes, I don’t think that it would be appropriate to use any language that might give the reader the wrong impression. The mainstream seems to regard PEAR not as honest but misguided bunglers, but rather as malicious pseudoscientists who started at their conclusion and worked backwards. We should avoid asserting that PEAR actually studied telekinesis in Wikipedia’s voice.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
627,189,452	::: There is no sense to either making any edits to the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis page or talking about it in the talk pages when assholes like you and SkepticalRaptor keep removing tertiary references to indisputable sedimentary nanodiamond papers in reputable peer reviewed journals.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,190,243	REDIRECT Talk:William Hamilton (comic poet)	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
627,190,611	You won't back down. Right? You know absolutely nothing about what you edit, don't want to be educated, and prefer to hide behind Wikipedia.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,191,504	::::Kal, p. 194 makes the same point.	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
627,193,322	`== Thanks for feedback == Thanks for your comments on Evolution’s second law of thermodynamics fallacy. It is very helpful to have made clear the reasons for refusal. You are correct; the subject is covered in Entropy and life. The “open system” argument is given there to explain “Schrodinger’s paradox”. Lehninger’s argument “that the ‘order’ produced within cells… is more than compensated for by the ‘disorder’ they create…” (excess entropy) is also given to reconcile the second law and evolution. What is lacking is this new understanding, that the above arguments, while correct, are not sufficient to explain what they purport to do. This leads to an important misconception. That evolution is able to overcome the second law is worthy of full understanding. It is noteworthy that the author of the main reference and one of the references used for this submission are cited in Entropy and life. That there is only a single main reference can be attributed to the newness of the insight (February, 2014) and the information has not had time to be disseminated. Is not asking for more than a single peer reviewed journal reference a very high standard? LEBOLTZMANN2 : Your draft article, , is written more in the form of an essay than an encyclopedia article, and Wikipedia is not the place for that. Also, you cannot use other Wikipedia articles as references. To be useful to readers (to be in context) the information you want to convey should be added to the existing article. Having a new article will do noting to correct the 'misconception' you are referring to, and I suspect the same thing is probably mentioned in several other articles without being fully explained. :By the way, please don't think I'm trying to be difficult on grounds of not 'understanding'... that the fallacy you are writing about is based on a gross misunderstanding is fairly obvious to anyone with a decent understanding of physics. That the article you're using in a source is in The American Biology Teacher instead of a scientific journal, also, makes it pretty blatant that it's just an explanation, and not 'original reseaarch'. It's simply that this is a case where your goal would be better served by improving the discussion of the matter in other places instead of writing a new article. :, since you had previously declined this also, any comments? `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
627,193,880	==September 2014== Thank you for experimenting with the page Louis XVI of France on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Yamaguchi先生	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
627,195,626	:SHUT UP ORANJBLUD. AND STOP TELLING PEOPLE WHAT TO DO.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	true
627,206,973	::Do you have problem with it?	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
627,211,256	::: I have sent another email explaining a little more in depth. I would appreciate it if you could read it!	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,215,842	== Grandma Terri Should Burn in Trash == Grandma Terri is trash. I hate Grandma Terri. F%%K her to HELL!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
627,226,510	Grandma terri died on Shoot the Rapids. THats funny! F*ck Grandma Terri. Grandma Terri should burn in Hell.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
627,226,676	Grandma Terri, die in trash! I f#cking hate you Grandma Terri, with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength. Rot in trash Grandma Terri! Die now! F*ck you in the ass!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
627,226,989	Grandma Terri should burn alive and be shot! Get shot asshole G-mau! F^ck Grandma Terri in her old ass Grandma Terri, I hope you die soon! F%ck you in the eye! I hate you. I want to shoot your ass, Grandma Terri! Grandma Terri, you are shit! Grandma Terri, I wish you die! Die and go to Hell, Grandma Terri	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
627,230,739	` ::::::More ridiculous wikilawyering (as in ``misinterpreting policy or relying on technicalities to justify inappropriate actions``), precisely what you accuse others of doing, with ``internal inconsistency`` being the latest straw you're clutching to. You can not ``posit`` the sources aren't solid enough by offering the fact they also use Prso's nickname in addition to his real name as a supposed proof of their lack of solidity. Ludicrous. The fact that Prso mostly goes by his nickname, Dado, does not make his real first name, Miladin, non-existent. And his real name being Miladin IS backed up by numerous reliable sources. The fact that sources mentioning Prso's real name Miladin also use his nickname Dado is a ``inconsistent`` only in your world. No one disputes he mostly goes by Dado. ::::::You've been removing verified info from Dado Prso over the span of 8 years already (whilst with a straight face characterizing the work of other editors' as ``harping``), standing guard against, and I quote, ``Serb nationalist talking points``, a ``thinly veiled political advocacy``, and an ``unverified Serbian name claim``. ::::::Not to mention accusing people of WP:Point. Precious. I guess including information backed up by reliable sources qualifies as ``proving a point`` in your little world. ::::::There are hundreds, if not thousands, examples of Wiki BLPs titled according to the person's nickname, and all of them have the the person's real first name included in the lede: ::::::Co Adriaanse (Jacobus ``Co`` Adriaanse) ::::::Sol Campbell (Sulzeer Jeremiah ``Sol`` Campbell) ::::::Alex Ferguson (Alexander Chapman ``Alex`` Ferguson) ::::::Matt Busby (Alexander Matthew ``Matt`` Busby) ::::::Jupp Heynckes (Josef ``Jupp`` Heynckes) ::::::Ruud van Nistelrooy (Rutgerus Johannes Martinus ``Ruud`` van Nistelrooy) ::::::Marco van Basten (Marcel ``Marco`` van Basten) ::::::Uli Hoeneß (Ulrich ``Uli`` Hoeneß) ::::::Toe Blake (Joseph Hector ``Toe`` Blake) ::::::Cotton Fitzsimmons (Lowell ``Cotton`` Fitzsimmons), and so on, and so forth (just to keep it to the sportspeople) ::::::Somehow I don't see any sign of you over the last 8 years on any of those bios, removing the individuals' first names from their articles' respective ledes nor are you spewing any of your wikilawyering nonsense on those article's talk pages, complaining that the real name sources are ``internally inconsistent`` (btw, most of the bios don't even provide sources for the first name information) or pointing out that the person's nickname is more widely used than his first name as basis to remove the first name from the lede. ::::::Also, whatever happened to that earlier claim of yours about including Dado Prso's real name in his bio constituting ``thinly veiled political advocacy``, and an ``unverified Serbian name claim``? Considering there are numerous non-Serb sources stating Dado Prso's real name to be Miladin, do you still see it as a Serb nationalist effort? ::::::So to recap. There are reliable sources meeting WP:BLP criteria under WP:SOURCE and WP:NEWSORG as 'factual content' (including a well-established news agency with numerous reprints) that explicitly state his real name is Miladin. No amount of wikilawyering from your end can change this basic fact. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,235,228	== Notice about creating articles of living people == Please include sources, thanks.	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
627,247,051	` ::::::::I wasn't going to bother with your obvious nonsense until you went back to removing verified info, but your mondo.rs claim about this piece that I posted above being the ``one single source one their site that uses the name Miladin`` is patently false. In addition to what was posted already, there's also this, this, and this. A simplest of Google searches returned that. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,254,516	::::::::Furthermore, we got high-circulation Serbian daily newspapers referring to Miladin Prso (1, 2, 3, 4 (referencing Slovenian coverage that also mentions Miladin), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 + a Croatian web portal referencing the aforementioned Slovenian coverage 11). And then there's the Serbian sports news portals (12, 13, 14, etc, etc....).	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,256,683	` == I Hate Grandma Terri == I hate my step grandma Grandma Terri. ``Step Grandma`` is an overstatement. F-ck Grandma Terri in her old ass. Grandma Terri shoult be raped to death. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
627,256,809	` ::::::::And the wikilawyering continues. There's nothing arbitrary about the sources I listed, they include highest-circulation print media outlets in Serbia and Slovenia as well as the most prominent regional web portals. The fact that many sources are non-English language (all perfectly in line with verifiability policies WP:NOENG) is understandable considering Prso doesn't hold the same prominence outside of former Yugoslavia. Even so, there is a number of reliable English language sources, such as Agence France Presse stating explicitly his real first name is Miladin, so weaselly worded unsupported claims such as 'run-of-the-mill agency' and 'below the threshold of relevance' ain't gonna cut it. WP:FULLNAME is very clear about the opening paragraph: ``While the article title should generally be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, the subject's full name should be given in the lead paragraph, if known (including middle names, if known, or middle initials).``. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,258,592	` :::The way this request is worded contains/implies several fallacies that might mislead a new editor and as such they must be pointed out. :::The statement ``It's not verified that it's still the person's proper name today`` implies, with zero reliable sources offered in support, that Dado Prso might have legally changed his first name. This is completely baseless. Not a single sources supports this claim/implication. On the other hand, numerous reliable sources state his first name to be Miladin. :::Furthermore, the above claim about the statement Dado Prso's real name is Miladin being ``a Croatian/Serbian nationalist talking point`` is nothing but a claim by Joy that's by no means established fact. Originally, he claimed it's a 'Serbian nationalist talking point on Wikipedia' and 'thinly veiled political advocacy' (presumably also Serbian), but now in the request he changed it to 'Croatian/Serbian talking point'. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
627,260,535	== Sarbajit Roy == I cant understand for life of me why you keep sending this article to India Against Corruption.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
627,269,107	== IAC == There is a discussion on article's talk page.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
627,288,092	: Now Gaba p joins the long list of complete fucking assholes who revert every minor edit of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis wiki page. Let me give you a clue, fuckface, you can't possibly justify reverting an edit that simply ads another tertiary peer reviewed publication related to this subject. It's inane, it's anal, it's uniformed and it's just plain wrong.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	true
627,288,218	So by all means, come here to the talk page and try to explain your actions. I'll be waiting.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false

626,419,102

`Dear Huon, Is not giving accurate information on the Infobox official language of the African Union, as the AU has no 4 working languages, African Union has 6 official languages and ``any African language.`` Either are official languages may be used as a working language. Here is a video from Youtube where it takes place in one of the Summit of the African Union, the announcement of the formalization of the Spanish in the organization. Wikipedia is not giving accurate information on this issue because a publisher called to change without any real source is allowed, just do not provide any evidence of his claim. Equatorial Guinea President Teodoro Obiang, ``Announces Spanish as Official Language of African Union`` The announcement happened during a press conference on 30 July 2011 immediately following the third day of the 17th Ordinary African Union Summit at the Sipopo International Conference Center on the island of Bata in the Republic of Equatorial Guinea. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXYtVDz29wc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.103.69.206 (talk) `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

626,424,765

==Hasmens Here== Its not the removal of the sections that concerns me, it is the whole notion that the removal was are targeted racially motivated act on behalf of Dr.K. Dr.K's comment on GiorgosY user account clearly is evident of his nature, this is the exact remark he made; note that this user is now banned from repeated disruption and violation on wikipedia. On the other hand I feel that Admin Diana is possibly abusing there admin role. The nature that this was dealt with wasn't very positive nor constructive, nor was it neutral in any nature. I also noticed that sections that were not added by me were also removed leaving the article on Northern Cyprus in a terrible un-repaired state. I would like to foward this I don't believe that Admin Diana has acted in an appropriate nature when dealing with this issue, I am aware that the sections were copyright but the nature in which it was dealt was wrong. This is not what Wikipedia should be about. I was not aware of the copyright issues as I was still new to editing on Wikipedia and still learning, if I were to put the information into my own words Dr.K still disapproved of my edits by saying there not well sourced when they were clearly taking from books written by historians. Even if I were to provide more than one source he would still disprove, it seems the truth has disturbed this fellow Wikipedia user, if am not aloud to write well sourced truths, than my time on editing Wikipedia an even reading Wikipedia articles will be over. The level of inaccuracy and bias articles seen on Wikipedia will in future lead this site to losing much of its popularity and legitimacy as it already is declining. Good Day. ( )

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,429,380

== Insecurity? == Andythegrump, There are deeply insecure people who try to mask there insecurity by rudeness. They are usually not capable of hearing contrary voices and respond to the by rude noises! I am sure that you are not one of these insecure folks... are you? It will be a good idea for you to cool down!!! Take care.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

626,434,610

:*Its not very professional of you to insult my language EdJohnston. English is indeed my first language. ( )

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,439,569

== FFS What am I doing wrong? == I'm trying to help sort better information here and it seems as if you hate and dissagree with me here. What is wrong with it? Can you please explain. I'm not vandalizing or ruining pages.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

626,454,691

*Oppose. I fully agree with Montanabw. In Britain polled tends to mean naturally polled. Other cattle are referred to as dehorned or disbudded when horns have been removed. This can all be covered on one page.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

626,475,487

== Your blog == I'm sorry, but we don't use personal blogs as sources or as external links, see WP:EL. Also please read conflict of interest. Thanks.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

626,477,078

I am sad to see you leave. You are one of the most valuable people on this project. With the many amazing things you have done for wikipedia. To only get a double slap in the face of two administrators. For the reason I do not like your style and attitude with me. So I will slap you. Why? Because I can. Instead of thinking hey this an editor with over 150k edits, 7 years of experience, and held in high regard by the community. maybe we should talk this through a bit more and in the end maybe even agree to disagree. I might leave as well if admins can do this without consequences.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

626,485,575

No, I do agree with , he is excellent. And you, , you might have something wrong with understanding others and expressing yourself. Are you retired? Why are you so active always? What such a retired and inactive editor could have made me experience blocked for 24 hours? I do appreciate with you so much, and this is the nice sarcasm for you, .

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

626,489,554

Sorry for some of my ignorant behavior and the inconvenience I caused, I'm not that good with some resources like that Jersey Club one, I had a couple of references there but I guess I should of looked more into it and add more references along the way. I'll try to keep that in mind next time. Thanks.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

626,495,194

Junge Dame beim Anlegen einer Perlenkette .. nothing here either]]

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

626,505,200

` :::So... Can we add a citation next to the quote ``virulent campaign`` without people getting angry/insta-revert? `

2,014

false

article

random

test

false

626,549,309

::: And Codename Lisa that would have been relevant had I realized that was actually an Administrator but there is no indication on his Talkpage that was true at the time or even now for that matter. But thanks...

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,608,548

== Infobox == Why shouldn't this article have an infobox? I have been reverted twice now with no reason what so ever. Please, do explain!

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

626,610,891

==Hasmens== Dr.K I think your ridiculous remarks to me prove that I have been wasting my time especially calling me a troll proves to me how immature you are. You are in a very wrong place maybe someday you will find your way. Dr.K you need to see a real Dr.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

626,615,017

== GTX 960 is launching next moth, does EXIST and STOP MESSAGING PEOPLE IF YOU'RE THAT CLUELESS == If you don't know the GTX 960 does exist and is launching in October, STOP MESSAGING PEOPLE, clueless moron that doesn't know how to use Google to search for information.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

626,620,677

::Thank you Phil, The problem is a bit more serious. I have two editors who did not have sources for claiming a link between religion and ethnicity in Galicia. I had authority to the contrary, so I deleted it, but added commentary on the talk page with the sources. They said something was true without sources or discussion and demanded that I prove that it wasn't. No compromise is possible with these people. Things have now escalated to the OR page. I have also noticed a violation of the Wiki naming policy for ethnic groups and self-identification, as these editors continue to refer to Carpo-Rusyns as Ukrainians. Since Carpo-Rusyns find it offensive to be labeled Ukrianians, I have left a warning on one editors talk page and on the Galicia talk page. Should I report this somewhere else? This guy doesn't care who he is offending with his behavior.

2,014

false

user

random

train

false

626,621,871

Can someone add the URL to the ANSI standard ? Many thanks -

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

626,624,534

== IRS message == Hello there. This is the IRS. You owe us $25,000 in unpaid taxes. Kristina at IRS http://www.irs.gov.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

626,624,742

`Notice of rebooted discussion == I have started a new discussion on the ``No personal attacks`` policy page. Since this is (still) an issue of civility, and the subject of much debate here and elsewhere on the project, watchers of this page are invited to participate. ``Avoiding personal attacks``. Sincerely. == `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

626,624,871

== Explanation == My revdeleted comment was a bad-tempered response to a deliberately needling statement from someone who has a bit of history when it comes to doling out such statements. I explained this when contacted by on Sunday, in my message to him at 10:32 UTC. I emphasised that my words were figurative and in the context of what had been said by the other contributor. I also asked Philippe to reassure that contributor of various things, including that I know nothing about them, that I neither have nor have access to any weapons beyond the sort of thing usually found in a UK home, and that there was no intent to do anything in particular except leave in utter frustration of the bad faith etc flying around. I assume that message had been passed on by around 19:55 UTC latest, which is when Philippe replied to me. I haven't looked at Wikipedia since that bad-tempered retort and would not have looked at it now if it were not for someone asking me to post some sort of comment. I'm not reading through the stuff above, nor looking at the ANI thread that I'm told was opened. Until certain things happen, some on-wiki and some involving an issue that the WMF are looking at off-wiki, I'm gone from here. I'm pretty sure that those certain things will happen but I doubt that they will do so soon, and it may be that I decide not to return anyway. Frankly - and I know this will seem arrogant - that would be Wikipedia's loss, not mine. If/when I do return, I'll be notifying quite a few people that I would rather they stayed away from my talk page, which is something I've always been reluctant to do in the past. I'm fed up of lynch mobs and gangs here, so anything that helps to reduce the baiting is A Good Thing. As a rule of thumb, if you've baited in the past, you can assume that you'll be on the list because, although often I do not publicly support him, that seems to be the common denominator among those who bait me. The gang can go elsewhere, while I hope that Eric and myself will continue to agree/agree to differ as and when appropriate and in an adult manner. We can get on with improving content; the baiters can carry on doing whatever it is they want to do elsewhere. My thanks to everyone who has contacted me. It was just a bad-tempered response: I'm perfectly happy in life, if slightly miffed at the increased distances I'm having to travel due to some unfortunate Wiki-related events. -

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

626,625,018

== IRS notice == Hello there, this is the IRS. You owe us $19,000 in unpaid taxes. Kristina Gonzalez, Inland Revenue Service http://www.irs.gov.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

626,625,252

== IRS notice == You owe unpaid taxes to the IRS. Please talk to your local office within 90 days or action will be taken. Kristina Gonzalez, Inland Revenue Service http://www.irs.gov

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

626,625,549

== IRS notice == Please do not revert our page. The IRS owns that talk page. We use this IP address, even if Crissic own it. Kristina Gonzalez Inland Revenue Service, http://www.irs.gov

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

626,629,687

ATTENTION JD WOLF, Too much fanfare? Bull_Sh!!!!!!!!!! http://brainimmune.com/andor-szentivanyi-and-the-beta-adrenergic-theory-of-allergy-and-asthma/

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

true

626,631,145

(ie: their identity etc)

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,673,854

` *Oppose I was originally in favor of inclusion, but the more that I've thought about, the more I believe that it is WP:UNDUE weight. There are literally thousands and thousands of articles about this topic. Not every little tidbit should be in the article. If this was something important, then you would see a lot more sources covering. The fact that this has gotten very little attention by reliable sources is a strong indication of its importance. Aside from the WP:UNDUE, I'm concerned about the sourcing. The two sources being cited appear to be opinion pieces, not straight news reporting. WP:BLP says to ``Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources``. I don't see how this meets the tough sourcing requirements set forth by BLP. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

626,674,082

:::::No rush checking out the platform at the HTC. I just thought of a few more locations that could use pictures at some stage - the transfer stations and the last active freight siding on the Cape at the power plant in Sagamore. I'm sure that there are remnants of a few stations around that could be photographed too, like in Sagamore. (you can see the foundation of the old station on Google Maps.)

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

626,683,730

` == Batta is used for kashmiri hindus == The non-muslims (hindus by default in modern sense) in kashmir valley especially brahmins were historically and still called ``Batta`` in kashmir valley as the word ``hindu`` was unknown to kashmiris. It is only in recent times that kashmiri batta (brahmins) have started calling themselves hindus something which they always detested. I never knew that Batta are also found in punjab and many khatris are derived from Batta caste, surprising and interesting.`

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

626,692,779

== Semi-protected edit request on 22 September 2014 == tomatoe potato ketchup onion awesome I like budder don't you knowḞỮ

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

626,699,425

== Hey donkey == Hey donkey, its your uncle.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

626,711,998

:Yeah that looks like her. My two cents is that she was blonde when she was interviewed in the source cited, and also appears to be so in the video you linked, and that's how they describe her. However, you and I just looking at her image and saying she is a brunette would be considered original research here on Wikipedia. It may seem strange but the source that's cited does describe her has a blonde, and unless another source can be found that explicitly says she is a brunette, we have to use what the sources give us.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

626,713,061

` ==Unsupported Edit== There is an unsubstantiated edit by 71.236.6.189, dating from July 1, 2012. It has no known reference and yet is very detailed in its description. Does this ``editing contribution`` to Wikipedia stay or go, since it is seemingly conjecture at its best? The user has never returned to Wikipedia, so it doesn't appear that anyone can ask them about it or its source... `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

626,717,257

:: Best response ever ◔̯◔

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

626,762,420

: The appropriate instruction is at WP:USER#Non-free images: if a non-free image appears on a sandbox page, for example , the image is to be removed from the page immediately. If you continue to add non-free images to sandbox pages, you may be blocked from editing.

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

626,783,513

Discospinster, what constitutes the criteria for deleting a company page? Why does hourlynerd get to keep its page up while other startups have to take theirs down? Seems ridiculous and subjective. Gorley

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

626,783,634

Mr. Wolf, We need to have a serious talk about Asthma. Have you done any reading about ASTHMA? The Beta Adrenergic Theory is the ONLY Theory of Asthma that can be associated with one name {not including crackpots} so your question about other names insults my intelligence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not only that but in contrast to other theories this one has been cited more than any other article in the history of the Journal of Allergy according to the GARFIELED LIBRARY at The University of Pennsylvania. Last but not least, my comment would be out of place in the history section because it relates DIRECTLY to the BA2 polymorphism. Since other polymorphisms CANNOT be related to a specific theory, much less to a specific individual, your comment doesn't make any sense.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,786,309

` == ``relaxed abortion laws``? == Actually, he voted against what eventually became the 1967 Abortion Act: http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1966/jul/22/medical-termination-of-pregnancy-bill#S5CV0732P0_19660722_HOC_74 And later, in 1985, he introduced the unsuccessful Unborn Children (Protection) Bill, which would among other things have defined life as beginning at conception. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

626,817,393

== Dodoma Region DYK == Hey Cwmhiraeth! Thanks for the review. I've added an inline citation as requested. Could you take another look at it please? Cheers! —

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,823,182

I get the feeing you are NOT a physician. I did NOT give you a personal website. I gave you a webpage with a review written by a world renowned immunologist. I gave you SCHOLARLY references to show the link between BA2 and The Beta Adrenergic Theory of Asthma. I am concerned that an editor of Wikipedia knows absolutely nothing about what he is editing. Nobody is asking your opinion about The Beta Adrenergic Theory but instead I am pointing there is no other theory of that can identified with a specific individual {aside from crackpots}.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

626,854,929

` == Summary of Unrest in Lede == This phrase in the lede - ``and in which the use of militarized police was drastically reduced`` - appears to be an editorial comment unsupported by the RS in the body of the article. What is ``militarized police`` and how was subsequent policing not ``militarized police?`` There either needs to be an objective definition, or a RS needs to be presented that - while not providing a definition - at least supports that unambiguous statement. I've made a WP:BOLD edit. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

626,865,600

` :Unfortunately, even if an article has been touched by the hand of ``god``—whichever one you wish to believe in—if unverified content is included, then it needs to be highlighted. While appearance is relevant, Wikipedia is not merely a design forum, or an example of aesthetic excellence—it is an encyclopedic website that seeks to contain verifiable information. The importance of tags is so that copyeditors can easily identify the sections that need to be verified—it is also important that readers know when content is not verified. Yes, I could have sourced the information myself, but given that I am only one person, with finite energy and time, I feel that it is beneficial to highlight gaps in the article while I attend to the multiple other priorities in my life—this also provides other copyeditors with an opportunity to improve the article until I return to the article. I have restored the template, as it is still relevant. Thanks. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

626,895,833

` == Martine Rothblatt's wife Beverlee ``Bina Aspen`` Prator - source == A connected contributor, , has reverted for no legitimate reason and deleted valid source(s). deleted that Bina's real name is Beverlee (see source below), and IP has done the same thing. * ``The Rothblatts, now married, legally adopted each other’s children, and would soon have two more. Bina started her conversion to Judaism (her given name is actually Beverlee).`` http://nymag.com/news/features/martine-rothblatt-transgender-ceo/index2.html * ``Bina, who is African-American, grew up in Compton and was working as a real-estate agent. http://nymag.com/news/features/martine-rothblatt-transgender-ceo/index1.html * Beverlee Prator with Martine Rothblatt, September 9, 2014: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/beverlee-prator-and-martine-rothblatt-arrive-to-new-york-news-photo/455114476 `

2,014

false

article

random

dev

false

626,901,808

}} {{WikiProject Record Labels| class = |importance=

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

626,912,844

` :It appears to be no more a genuine ``museum`` than a souvenir shop selling or displaying reproductions or facsimiles of objects in other museums would be a ``museum``. That is not to say it is not notable enough for an article - but let's set aside its ``museum`` status (maybe call it something less specific, like a ``gallery``). `

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

626,915,715

`== Titles of articles == For your information, see Talk:Swiss popular initiative ``Against mass immigration``#Requested moves. .`

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

626,920,422

` What you've been told seems to be erroneous. See Category:Reggae rock songs for example, which features reggae rock songs by artists whose main genre is not reggae rock (eg The Clash). Also ``hlists`` are more readable than ``flatlists`` and exactly work the same way. So there's no reason to change one template for another one... Finally adding ``hard rock`` within buddling references is useless if the references are next to the sourced material. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,926,354

` == On the way forward: consider this before posting here == I would much prefer it if certain people did not post on this page. So, before posting please consider whether you might be described as a tendentious canvasser or drama seeker, mischief-maker, advocate, misrepresenter, someone who piles on without clue, or someone carrying over ``by association`` the disputes that they have with contributors elsewhere. If you might fall into one or more of those categories and still think it necessary to pass comment here then please try to find an admin to do that for you (and if you are an admin - Chillum comes to mind - then find another). I'm not keen on this because it restricts collaboration but, hey, people like that basically just seem to vent, poke or offer weird ``advice`` when I am the subject of their attention. I'm human, not a saint; while my ability to tolerate the types described above is not bad, it is also not infinite. I'd be pleased if the time that you would have spent here is expended instead on editing India-related articles. But bear in mind that you will need to be able to: *deal knowledgeably with touchy and repetitively-raised issues such as Hindutva-, religious- and caste-related POV-pushing *handle completely clueless newbies on a large scale, many of them encouraged to edit by an ill-considered WMF initiative *handle often large-scale sock- and meat-farms, and masses of copyvio and BLP violations *take copious amounts of general abuse pretty much daily *face all sorts of physical and legal threats, both on- and off-wiki, as well as real-life stalking over prolonged periods by multiple people All with little or no support from the WMF and large swathes of the community who are more interested in the never-ending tendentious discussion of ``meta`` issues - among them policy, ``honor``, and the creation of a Wikitopia - than actually improving content where it matters most. And when you need a break from articles that relate to 20 per cent of the world's population and which suffer grossly from bias, systemic and otherwise, go chill by creating a GA or at least a B-class article more or less single-handed. Do all of this and you'll make me a very happy (and surprised) man. Do it for 130k-ish edits without getting blocked, on spurious grounds or otherwise, then you'll be really quite remarkable. I'm not saying that I will be back but if I do return, I'd rather not see stuff here from the types of people described above. Thanks. - `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,936,568

` ::::::It's not only ``too long`` it's also an opinionated attack creation, this version was outrageous and should never have been published - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alessandra_Stanley&diff;=626918992&oldid;=626918428 - I agree with everyone but - `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

626,947,454

::::They'll see your attempt to own the article and your POV-warring. -

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,960,132

If such an editor were to get banned? there'd possibly be a hug push to 'change' Arbcom.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

626,964,145

::I provided an answer to the above link. Now stop restoring all of this !

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

626,968,417

|in=Kern County, California

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

627,027,129

` == Death of J.E.B. Stuart == == JEB STUART== I cannot find JEB Stuart's staff members listed anywhere in all of Internet. His personal doctor was [Peter ?] Fontaine, son of Col. Edmund Fontaine of ``Beaver Dam``. JEB's death message came to Beaverdam where MRS JEB Stuart was staying with the Edmund Fontaine family. Can anyone assist in finding JEB Stuart's staff officers? Thank you for your consideration and knowledge. `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

627,033,599

DO NOT ERASE MY MESSAGES - This behaviour is infraction with the talk page guidelines as clearly described here Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments ::RESTORED MESSAGE -Thanks for your tips. I'll indeed take it to ANI and I've neutralized the title without completely changing the nature of the topic (which was the purpose of your action). Metropolitan (talk)

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,048,820

== Regarding this article == Respected Sir/Madam, I have corrected [when] from this to this when. Please include his height 5 ft 9 in (1.75m) or (175cm). I will give the reliable link where I have found this information. The link is http://www.lightscamerabollywood.com/bollywood-heroes-heights/.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,054,925

Also I didn't intend doing what you see, but the coversation I've been involved in is not finished and I just wanted to keep all of this the way it was before doing anything else.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,055,151

I promised not removing anything else about me but I just want an oversighter help me dealing with my problems.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

627,055,860

Gov't source says Adra's Old City is still rebel-held

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

627,056,745

` ::I'm perfectly able to edit Wikipedia without any problem at all, but people like the first ones I met clearly refused didn't want to understand and barely helped me. As you can see on this talk page, several editors recognized by good faith edits and I think you should do the same. What you call ``personal attacks`` are not personal attacks. This is exactly the way I've been welcomed to this projects before meeting clever people able to understand I was able to do great things to improve articles. Once again I never inteding attacking anybody around here. That's not my purpose. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

627,056,830

understandng what I was doing

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,057,148

. I'm only looking for some help, that's it. Nothing else. I'm a peaceful editor who spend most of its completing/cleaning up articles

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,057,688

Still not in that one as well.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

627,092,552

== AC/DC == Hi, the members' page has used that format for a number of years, so if you want to suggest changes, please use the talk page, like everyone else does. Also, it is not true that any of those former members were temporary. All were considered permanent at the time, according to the sources. One that is not clear is Paul Matters, who is currently listed as a temporary member. I don't think it's appropriate to list someone like Laughlin, who stood in for Evans at a few gigs, next to someone like Bon Scott. Cheers, :I don't agree with any of your arguments! This idea is to match with the timeline... No need to talk about it much longer... Time for changes has come! Please respect my edit which is simply logical and... much better!

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,093,543

== Repeated Abuse! == Repeat abuse and not look. Closing.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

627,096,370

== Title section revert == Hi, I was at the office earlier and I hadn't noticed your warning before restoring the title of the section. I'm sorry for that. Of course I won't do such a revert again. Just to clarify, I've opened a new section to indeed alert some contributors that they were behaving in a way in line with the examples of ownership behaviour as described here. In return the title of the section has been twisted to something unrelated and one of my message has been erased. It is the first time I see people editing other's signed contributions in a talk page. This just looks crazy to me.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

627,100,751

` == What is this supposed to mean? As far away from POV-neutral as one can imagine… == ``After McQuaid was buried under the High Altar in Dublin's Pro-Cathedral, he was quickly forgotten, as his successors struggled, unsuccessfully in the end, to fend off what became known as 'the liberal agenda'.`` That is really how the article ends at present. What a joke. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,101,799

`:: If so, then can you explain me why the Tour Montparnasse markets itself in its own advertisement as offering ``the most beautiful view of Paris`` illustrated by a picture offering the exact same angle on the Eiffel Tower: ::* Advertisement #1 ``the most beautiful view of Paris`` ::* Advertisement #2 ``the most beautiful view of Paris`` :: Why would they do so if ``no one considers this image as picturing Paris``, maybe they are bad marketers? And similarly, can you explain me why the official magazine of the City Council of Paris also use an image from the same angle on its cover: ::* Cover of the Paris City Council magazine with as caption ``Paris, attractive capital`` :: I respect your general considerations, but I hardly see how they are relevant to the case. Yours respectfully. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

627,105,321

:: Here is the diff where my message had been erased: -

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,106,469

::Thank you . I'll keep on reviewing them then. )

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

627,116,161

` ==Vandalism?== ``True flies are insects of the order blabla. Did you know that one in every 10 flies is gay, and that gay flies are something. Also female flies carry maggots palindrome.`` Ehhhh.... seems like a bunch of crap to me. Delete it?`

2,014

false

article

random

test

false

627,144,745

: Oppose. This topic has already been the topic of multiple arbitrations in the past, none of which reached consensus on a multiple-picture montage: ::* 2013 arbitration: ::* 2013 request for contributions: ::* 2010 arbitration: ::* 2006 arbitration: ::* 2009 arbitration for the French article: : The 2006, 2009 and 2010 arbitrations reached consensus on the Eiffel Tower single image. The 2013 arbitration reached no consensus for a change, thus confirming that the single image of the Eiffel Tower should be maintained. A decision which was overstepped by in july 2013. Here is a link to the diff -

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

627,147,568

==WP:VG assessment== I'm pleased to say this article is definitely beyond stub-level now, and by my reckoning at the higher end of start-class. The overall structure of the article is in place, and there are a good number of images. My main concern is the size of the Gameplay section, which is completely unreferenced and quite game guide-esque. I would suggest trimming it back to the core essentials and sourcing this from reliable sources - have a look at some example articles for some ideas of how best to go about this. Similarly, the Development section is currently unsourced and quite brief - it could do with some expansion on the history of the development on the game, which I'm sure will be documented somewhere. The Reception section is looking good - add a couple of paragraphs summarising what professional reviewers have said about the game and it'll be great. Overall, if you fix these things then you're looking at a strong C or even B class article. Good luck!

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

627,155,974

` GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Article looks good, I'll go through it section-wise and see if I can find anything - #Is it reasonably well written? #:A. Prose is ``clear and concise``, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: #:: #:B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: #:: #Is it factually accurate and verifiable? #:A. Has an appropriate reference section: #:: #:B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: #:: #:C. No original research: #:: #Is it broad in its coverage? #:A. Major aspects: #:: #:B. Focused: #:: #Is it neutral? #:Fair representation without bias: #:: #Is it stable? #: No edit wars, etc: #:: #Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? #:A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: #:: #:B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: #:: #Overall: #:Pass or Fail: #::`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

627,156,692

: I support this welcome consensual proposal from .

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

627,185,323

::Jxm, I inserted the phrase “purporting to examine” back in January. I believe it is the most appropriate phrasing because: :::1. PEAR only claims to be examining psi, legitimate scientists don’t think that there is any psi to examine. :::2. Even if telekinesis were real, PEAR’s experiments wouldn’t have proven its existence anyway because of their methodological flaws. :::3. The reliable sources seem to be suggesting (though not outright stating) that PEAR was probably involved in deliberate fraud. The fact that one of PEAR’s own staff was an experimental subject who had a significant effect on their results coupled with the fact that PEAR’s results are not reproducible seems to have created some suspicion. ::While I’m not proposing that we add PEAR to one of Wikipedia’s lists of hoaxes, I don’t think that it would be appropriate to use any language that might give the reader the wrong impression. The mainstream seems to regard PEAR not as honest but misguided bunglers, but rather as malicious pseudoscientists who started at their conclusion and worked backwards. We should avoid asserting that PEAR actually studied telekinesis in Wikipedia’s voice.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

627,189,452

::: There is no sense to either making any edits to the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis page or talking about it in the talk pages when assholes like you and SkepticalRaptor keep removing tertiary references to indisputable sedimentary nanodiamond papers in reputable peer reviewed journals.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,190,243

REDIRECT Talk:William Hamilton (comic poet)

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

627,190,611

You won't back down. Right? You know absolutely nothing about what you edit, don't want to be educated, and prefer to hide behind Wikipedia.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,191,504

::::Kal, p. 194 makes the same point.

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

627,193,322

`== Thanks for feedback == Thanks for your comments on Evolution’s second law of thermodynamics fallacy. It is very helpful to have made clear the reasons for refusal. You are correct; the subject is covered in Entropy and life. The “open system” argument is given there to explain “Schrodinger’s paradox”. Lehninger’s argument “that the ‘order’ produced within cells… is more than compensated for by the ‘disorder’ they create…” (excess entropy) is also given to reconcile the second law and evolution. What is lacking is this new understanding, that the above arguments, while correct, are not sufficient to explain what they purport to do. This leads to an important misconception. That evolution is able to overcome the second law is worthy of full understanding. It is noteworthy that the author of the main reference and one of the references used for this submission are cited in Entropy and life. That there is only a single main reference can be attributed to the newness of the insight (February, 2014) and the information has not had time to be disseminated. Is not asking for more than a single peer reviewed journal reference a very high standard? LEBOLTZMANN2 : Your draft article, , is written more in the form of an essay than an encyclopedia article, and Wikipedia is not the place for that. Also, you cannot use other Wikipedia articles as references. To be useful to readers (to be in context) the information you want to convey should be added to the existing article. Having a new article will do noting to correct the 'misconception' you are referring to, and I suspect the same thing is probably mentioned in several other articles without being fully explained. :By the way, please don't think I'm trying to be difficult on grounds of not 'understanding'... that the fallacy you are writing about is based on a gross misunderstanding is fairly obvious to anyone with a decent understanding of physics. That the article you're using in a source is in The American Biology Teacher instead of a scientific journal, also, makes it pretty blatant that it's just an explanation, and not 'original reseaarch'. It's simply that this is a case where your goal would be better served by improving the discussion of the matter in other places instead of writing a new article. :, since you had previously declined this also, any comments? `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

627,193,880

==September 2014== Thank you for experimenting with the page Louis XVI of France on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Yamaguchi先生

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

627,195,626

:SHUT UP ORANJBLUD. AND STOP TELLING PEOPLE WHAT TO DO.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

true

627,206,973

::Do you have problem with it?

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

627,211,256

::: I have sent another email explaining a little more in depth. I would appreciate it if you could read it!

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,215,842

== Grandma Terri Should Burn in Trash == Grandma Terri is trash. I hate Grandma Terri. F%%K her to HELL!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

627,226,510

Grandma terri died on Shoot the Rapids. THats funny! F*ck Grandma Terri. Grandma Terri should burn in Hell.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

627,226,676

Grandma Terri, die in trash! I f#cking hate you Grandma Terri, with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength. Rot in trash Grandma Terri! Die now! F*ck you in the ass!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

627,226,989

Grandma Terri should burn alive and be shot! Get shot asshole G-mau! F^ck Grandma Terri in her old ass Grandma Terri, I hope you die soon! F%ck you in the eye! I hate you. I want to shoot your ass, Grandma Terri! Grandma Terri, you are shit! Grandma Terri, I wish you die! Die and go to Hell, Grandma Terri

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

627,230,739

` ::::::More ridiculous wikilawyering (as in ``misinterpreting policy or relying on technicalities to justify inappropriate actions``), precisely what you accuse others of doing, with ``internal inconsistency`` being the latest straw you're clutching to. You can not ``posit`` the sources aren't solid enough by offering the fact they also use Prso's nickname in addition to his real name as a supposed proof of their lack of solidity. Ludicrous. The fact that Prso mostly goes by his nickname, Dado, does not make his real first name, Miladin, non-existent. And his real name being Miladin IS backed up by numerous reliable sources. The fact that sources mentioning Prso's real name Miladin also use his nickname Dado is a ``inconsistent`` only in your world. No one disputes he mostly goes by Dado. ::::::You've been removing verified info from Dado Prso over the span of 8 years already (whilst with a straight face characterizing the work of other editors' as ``harping``), standing guard against, and I quote, ``Serb nationalist talking points``, a ``thinly veiled political advocacy``, and an ``unverified Serbian name claim``. ::::::Not to mention accusing people of WP:Point. Precious. I guess including information backed up by reliable sources qualifies as ``proving a point`` in your little world. ::::::There are hundreds, if not thousands, examples of Wiki BLPs titled according to the person's nickname, and all of them have the the person's real first name included in the lede: ::::::*Co Adriaanse (Jacobus ``Co`` Adriaanse) ::::::*Sol Campbell (Sulzeer Jeremiah ``Sol`` Campbell) ::::::*Alex Ferguson (Alexander Chapman ``Alex`` Ferguson) ::::::*Matt Busby (Alexander Matthew ``Matt`` Busby) ::::::*Jupp Heynckes (Josef ``Jupp`` Heynckes) ::::::*Ruud van Nistelrooy (Rutgerus Johannes Martinus ``Ruud`` van Nistelrooy) ::::::*Marco van Basten (Marcel ``Marco`` van Basten) ::::::*Uli Hoeneß (Ulrich ``Uli`` Hoeneß) ::::::*Toe Blake (Joseph Hector ``Toe`` Blake) ::::::*Cotton Fitzsimmons (Lowell ``Cotton`` Fitzsimmons), and so on, and so forth (just to keep it to the sportspeople) ::::::Somehow I don't see any sign of you over the last 8 years on any of those bios, removing the individuals' first names from their articles' respective ledes nor are you spewing any of your wikilawyering nonsense on those article's talk pages, complaining that the real name sources are ``internally inconsistent`` (btw, most of the bios don't even provide sources for the first name information) or pointing out that the person's nickname is more widely used than his first name as basis to remove the first name from the lede. ::::::Also, whatever happened to that earlier claim of yours about including Dado Prso's real name in his bio constituting ``thinly veiled political advocacy``, and an ``unverified Serbian name claim``? Considering there are numerous non-Serb sources stating Dado Prso's real name to be Miladin, do you still see it as a Serb nationalist effort? ::::::So to recap. There are reliable sources meeting WP:BLP criteria under WP:SOURCE and WP:NEWSORG as 'factual content' (including a well-established news agency with numerous reprints) that explicitly state his real name is Miladin. No amount of wikilawyering from your end can change this basic fact. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,235,228

== Notice about creating articles of living people == Please include sources, thanks.

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

627,247,051

` ::::::::I wasn't going to bother with your obvious nonsense until you went back to removing verified info, but your mondo.rs claim about this piece that I posted above being the ``one single source one their site that uses the name Miladin`` is patently false. In addition to what was posted already, there's also this, this, and this. A simplest of Google searches returned that. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,254,516

::::::::Furthermore, we got high-circulation Serbian daily newspapers referring to Miladin Prso (1, 2, 3, 4 (referencing Slovenian coverage that also mentions Miladin), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 + a Croatian web portal referencing the aforementioned Slovenian coverage 11). And then there's the Serbian sports news portals (12, 13, 14, etc, etc....).

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,256,683

` == I Hate Grandma Terri == I hate my step grandma Grandma Terri. ``Step Grandma`` is an overstatement. F-ck Grandma Terri in her old ass. Grandma Terri shoult be raped to death. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

627,256,809

` ::::::::And the wikilawyering continues. There's nothing arbitrary about the sources I listed, they include highest-circulation print media outlets in Serbia and Slovenia as well as the most prominent regional web portals. The fact that many sources are non-English language (all perfectly in line with verifiability policies WP:NOENG) is understandable considering Prso doesn't hold the same prominence outside of former Yugoslavia. Even so, there is a number of reliable English language sources, such as Agence France Presse stating explicitly his real first name is Miladin, so weaselly worded unsupported claims such as 'run-of-the-mill agency' and 'below the threshold of relevance' ain't gonna cut it. WP:FULLNAME is very clear about the opening paragraph: ``While the article title should generally be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, the subject's full name should be given in the lead paragraph, if known (including middle names, if known, or middle initials).``. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,258,592

` :::The way this request is worded contains/implies several fallacies that might mislead a new editor and as such they must be pointed out. :::The statement ``It's not verified that it's still the person's proper name today`` implies, with zero reliable sources offered in support, that Dado Prso might have legally changed his first name. This is completely baseless. Not a single sources supports this claim/implication. On the other hand, numerous reliable sources state his first name to be Miladin. :::Furthermore, the above claim about the statement Dado Prso's real name is Miladin being ``a Croatian/Serbian nationalist talking point`` is nothing but a claim by Joy that's by no means established fact. Originally, he claimed it's a 'Serbian nationalist talking point on Wikipedia' and 'thinly veiled political advocacy' (presumably also Serbian), but now in the request he changed it to 'Croatian/Serbian talking point'. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

627,260,535

== Sarbajit Roy == I cant understand for life of me why you keep sending this article to India Against Corruption.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

627,269,107

== IAC == There is a discussion on article's talk page.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

627,288,092

: Now Gaba p joins the long list of complete fucking assholes who revert every minor edit of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis wiki page. Let me give you a clue, fuckface, you can't possibly justify reverting an edit that simply ads another tertiary peer reviewed publication related to this subject. It's inane, it's anal, it's uniformed and it's just plain wrong.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

true

627,288,218

So by all means, come here to the talk page and try to explain your actions. I'll be waiting.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false