Datasets:
dirtycomputer
/
Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
627,301,281
`I still very much disagree with the ``consensus`` to NOT include the text of the Psalm in the document. Or at the very minimum, include a prominent link to a site, such as the BibleHub, which will allow everyone to choose their own favourite translation. Not all readers are expert in the contents of the actual Psalm. In fact, most are not and have never read it at all. It's like attempting to review a movie without ever having seen it in the first place! How is this different? Perhaps include links to the Top 10 most popular translations, but at least to the KJV. All translations have problems, but excluding them all is not the answer. `
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
627,302,504
` ::Okay, I think we're mostly there apart from the concerns in the lead. Once the few remaining issues are left, I can pass this. `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
627,313,427
==About Rajus page== Hi! You are a senior editor in wikipedia from Andhra Pradesh.I have seen your user page & edits.Please help and verify the article in which i have added information from sources of Anthropological Survey of India by K.S.Singh. You can see those from links: http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=QsMfU6D0CIr9rAep54DgBw&id;=bfAMAQAAMAAJ&dq;=communities%2Csegments&focus;=searchwithinvolume&q;=nanded https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Raju/Archive_2#Raju_caste_and_Kshatriya_status If you are interested, please help to develop the Rajus article by adding information and protect it from vandalism.Thank You -abcde
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,337,292
September 2014 (UTC) ===The topic has been brought to the Administrators Noticeboard=== There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding this issue. 23:10, 27
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,353,077
` * No , should I hire someone to copy-edit or you will? Because I want it to be done in two-three days, and I think article just need a quick copy-edit of grammar and spelling. « ♦ ♦ » `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
627,354,116
` {| style=``background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0;`` cellpadding=``0`` |- | style=``border: 1px solid #084080; background-color: #F5FFFA; vertical-align: top; color: #000;``| {| cellpadding=``0`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align: top; background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0; width: 100%;`` |- | Hello, LuckyLucas, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |} {| width=``100%`` style=``background-color:#F5FFFA;`` |style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``0`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting started |- |style=``color:#000``| * A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored * How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article *Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard |- ! Getting help |- | style=``color:#000``| * Frequently asked questions • Tips * Where to ask questions or make comments * Request administrator attention * Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on * Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page |- ! Policies and guidelines |- | style=``color:#000``| * Neutral point of view • No original research * Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources * What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons * List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry * Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy * External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines * Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |- |} |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``0`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! The community |- |style=``color:#000``| * Build consensus • Resolve disputes * Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette * No personal attacks • No legal threats * Community portal • Village pump * Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists |- ! Writing articles |- |style=``color:#000``| * Be bold in editing • Develop an article * The perfect article • Simplified manual of style * Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation * Peer review • Featured content |- ! Miscellaneous |- |style=``color:#000``| * User pages • Talk pages * Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award * Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism * Join a WikiProject • Translation * Useful templates • Tools • User scripts |- |} |} |}`
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
627,362,778
Mr.Bishonen! & Joshua Jonathan, I don't understand why are you doing all these for me.Speaking harshly in the talk page because of not controlling my anger once long before can't be given unlimited ban for topic.If you keep doing this to every user.Then there will be no user left in wikipedia.Being an administrator you can't do such unjustice to users.It is total unjustice to a user.You please think of it, i haven't vandalised any articles in wikipedia, you can check them.Why i can't edit wikipedia articles, please think of it, what you are doing is not fair.Please relieve me from block and topic ban.Thank you, that you have atleast given me chance to write in my talk page. -abcde
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
627,377,365
::There is some content dispute over how Roy is connected to the IAC which is the subject of Wikipedia's article. Nevertheless, Roy is a notable person even without his IAC role, and is a well known / notable public interest advocate and RTI activist in India. So I suggest that you restore the Sarbajit Roy article so it can be improved to Wikipedia standards by auto-confirmed editors.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
627,388,940
`! This whole thread seems to be filled with the ``Friends of disgraced Wikipedia editor Sitush`` Society !!`
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
627,389,901
` == Forgery of IAC logo == The image on Wikipedia you proffered for Anna Hazare using IAC name contains an obvious forgery of IAC logo. As the copyright clerk please immediately arrange to get this image entirely deleted from Wikipedia. You can look at the order how the red and black ``humans`` stack up in overlap. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,392,165
::::::::TROLLING ALERT. BTW, do you have anything to contribute to the content dispute / the sources cited by me / my allegation that the present article is a blatant HOAX created by your dear departed friend who never attended Cambridge and has been HOAXING all India connected articles and editors with his silly edits ?
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,396,789
` ::Thanks for clearing up that indefed contributor Lindashiers is pursuing her text copyright infringement against Google (not WMF). It's her ``sexual harassment`` complaint against ``Sitush`` which is pending with WMF. Google's reply to the 23-Aug-2014 DMC complaint, viewable online, declined those takedowns because the IAC had approached Google directly. That evidentally caused Lindashiers and the ``agent`` from ``Name Defend India`` to land up at WP copyright on 3 Sept.2014, and fire their 2nd DMCA barrel after Voceditenore rejected it. Anyway this is all very interesting, but is the Sarbajit Roy article to come here or go somewhere else ? `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,397,189
` why don't you ``REMOVE`` my free speech you goddamned self, you whiny little pipsquak. That's all you seem to be good at doing.`
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
true
627,397,888
you're a PATHETIC, BUREAUCRATIC piece of slime. You can remove your withered ballsack with a rusty shears, or you can eat my shit. Your name will be on the syph list one day, with a †.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
627,397,994
use your tongue to paint my boat!
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
627,399,593
i'm a doctor of journalism, for chris'sakes... i don't even know why i'm wasting my time with this chicken-shit, cheapjack little myth-site anyway... there are WAAAAAAAAY better syph lists on the web, BELIEVE me... just thought i'd do y'all a favor, & share some honest medical facts—make this shoddy, incomplete list a BIT more comprehensive, perhaps, but what do you know—I was merely WASTING MY TIME! ... AGAIN!
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
true
627,399,739
BS! my family-friendly dialogue meets all P.C. standards... safe as milk...
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
627,399,925
dung. Libra, aren't you?
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,401,042
*:So finally, Wikipedia's ultimate weapon is wheeled out to silence criticism, and continue those paid edits which fuel Jimbo's champagne swilling pornographer lifestyle snatched from the lunch money of poor schoolkids. And yes Bishonen .. you are a grandmother .. like Sitush was from Cambridge. So let us see if this CheckUser's results will be any different from the chain of rigged ones before it.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,401,405
my bad. Lindashiers' email was ambiguous where she had complained to. You link to chillingeffects cleared that up, and a 2nd reading of her email made it clear that she has taken her sexual harassment matter to WMF.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,401,422
Wrong, I am neoconservative, and I hate all Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia and Iraq. See antisemitism in the Arab world. That is why I hate Arabs.
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
627,403,976
and being a female you are acting so cruel which is surprising
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
627,404,879
You are an administrator but not a monarch and also i don't know what kind of relationships you have with sitush or Joshua Jonathan or their group of rogues by following their words.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
627,404,921
` == Personal message for Blocking Admin ``Bishonen`` == :I have done my best to communicate with the racist editors at Wikipedia who despise Indians. The matter will now of course have to move on to criminal actions under Britain's gift to India - the Indian Penal Code, and its so neat that WMF's female pornographer trustee in India who runs several pornographic websites eg. is your (ie. Bishonen's) conspirator in these criminal actions against the one and only IAC which will surely also affect WMF's 501(c)(3) tax free status since you Bishonen have seriously blundered. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,406,892
` == Adding Former Country Infobox == I belive an infobox would be usfule like the case in Islamic Courts Union it claimed to be a state an it controled a number of cities between 2006-2007. here is my version of the infobox.`
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
627,409,999
` :“app`` might imply Applicable, Personal, and Portable, rather than only the abbreviation of APPlication. For the following reasons, Applicable, yeah, app could not be system utilities, only provided for purpose of application. Personal, app could not be copied onto other's computer or even another partition of this same HDD, tricks are exceptions. Portable, no matter Windows 8 or Windows RT, no matter IA-32, x86-64 or ARM might potentially share the same app without worries. OK, that is only my guess. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,439,504
REDIRECT Talk:Complete Music Update
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,444,624
` ::Thanks, I wasn't aware that users could individually switch it on. `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,449,169
. Please see 2014 Crimean crisis for reference on the monopoly of russian nicknames adding pro russian bias to the article.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
627,452,561
To PhilKnight- That's ridiculous, just take one look at the article. Any other point of view besides the russian one would do some good. I also, didin't see a dispute except with russian poster whom I believe are too brainwashed by their own government controlled media to even have a rational discussion, that's what happened to the rest of the editors on the article. They gave up trying to reach a consensus, and that's why it's so pro russian. Thanks for clearing that up and showing that you both have a blind eye for the obvious. I might rewrite the whole article with dicussions in the talk page at another time, but I doubt that will be productive since most of the editors there have no common sense and often turn a blind eye to any kind of information that their own media (such as RT) doesn't promote. If don't get banned for irrelavant reasons again ofcourse
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
627,457,765
Seriously, the vaccine is not useful and not safe. Can't you see a link with the article? Really?
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,457,894
No, YOU stop your grandstanding and pushing of uninformed personal POV which have nothing to do with article improvement.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,458,476
` Except I didn't ``push`` any ``fringe`` views. The dangers of vaccines are recognized by everyone. The fact that the flu vaccine is by far the least effective vaccine is recognized by everyone. The fact that climate science cannot explain the ``pause`` is recognized by everyone. I don't understand what the talk page is about if discussing article content is disallowed. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,458,681
` == Remove NPOV == I guess the days of NPOV are now over. WP should make that official, somehow. There is no scientific consensus on AWG. There is no proof: * that warming is accelerating * that a ``tipping point`` exists * that man has a significant influence on the climate This is all pseudo-science with zero predictive value. There is, however, a lot of sceptics bashing. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,459,993
Also, I must say that I get banned for small simple edits, while several russians edit in and out bullshit (for people who don't ignore the obvious), or in other words russian propoganda (including the backwards mindset that Russia is not at all involved in crimea). If anything you should ban other editors for reverting my changes, both of whom again I remind you, are extremely biased and shouldn't be treated the same way given the circumstances of their background (government controlled media) and motive to misinterpret news to suit the pro russian view, especially that article holy shit
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
627,460,385
You are a pathetic failure.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
627,463,886
REDIRECT Talk:Walter Jack Howell
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
627,464,485
` ::::Thanks, at least, for doing edits one-at-a-time rather than a single block edit. Now - can I ask you to actually read the sources? ::::* Malnutrition: There are multiple sources citing malnutrition as a cause of death (I've listed some of them above, twice) - so stop removing references to malnutrition. ::::* Diptheria: The page you list does not mention malnutrition. It does indeed mention use of feeding tubes. It is unclear to me how, if feeding tubes were required to treat children who had difficulty in swallowing, they weren't provided. But I'm not going to speculate. You, however, seem to insisting that all of the children who died from malnutrition actually died from diphtheria - which is a leap neither you nor can I make. So we report what the sources say. Deaths due to malnutrition. ::::* The 1947 report: Thanks for bringing that up - it's been a while since I read the linked source in detail. It doesn't mention diphtheria. At all. The only mentions of diphtheria in the entire article are your own insertions, and that one mention of an inspector visiting ``during a diphtheria outbreak`` - which has no reference. The cited article is very clear on the numbers of deaths in earlier years, though, which will be a useful expansion. ::::* Corless: Not sure of the relevance of her needing to have mentioned malnutrition. ::::* ``Larger issue``: There has not been ``months of investigation``. Politicians are still arguing about the terms of reference. I'm not going to speculate on what the outcome of the investigation will be, or of the inquests that have been called for, if they ever happen. But as when they report, we can add the findings here. `
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
627,493,073
` == Karmichael Hunt == You missed an important first step regarding Karmichael Hunt. Before taking the article to FAR, you are supposed to raise the issues on the article's talk page first. This step is more informal and typically designed to fix articles that can be salvaged. Since your concerns are restricted to sources and their formatting, this should be an easy fix for an interested editor.   `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,495,888
` September 2014 (UTC) :: Hi Mazzola. Thanks for your input ! 1st & 2nd points fixed. Last one I take your point about the uncertainty but the idea is that in WP one doesn't necessarily ref. everything in the intro., it's supposed to be a synthesis of the main article. About the heading ``We understand and can imitate the Paleolithic Diet`` the intention is that the that is an argument put forth by advocates of the PD. PS this article is a work in progress. Please see some of my other comments on this page, I'd like to hear what you have to say. 03:19, 29`
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
627,525,953
: Oh, I quit, I just came back to leave a message. Thanks though.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,526,326
== Air cooled radials == A recent addition uses this source to claim that the Heron head was invented by Gibson & Heron at the RAE in 1918. Now Heron is an uncommon name. I'd expect there to be some involvement, whether now or later. However I'm unconvinced that this Gibson-Heron head is at all related to the Heron head. The Gibson-Heron head is a design for sealing the head of an air-cooled radial engine, so as to give good thermal transfer and thus avoid valve overheating. The Heron head, as used by Jaguar, is a design for combustion chambers. Is there really any overlap?
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,526,883
:Thanks . I assume your good faith on my talk page block, I would be glad if in return you would assume my good faith on the WP:OWN case I raised, especially about the 2013 RfC which has been constantly ignored during 16 months. I have posted an initial warning of possible WP:OWN case on 25 septembre 2014 . Considering its very rude reception and the escalation, I decided to bring it to the AN/I on 27 septembre 2014 . I would be pleased if you would explain exactly how my behaviour could consist a WP:HARASS case, as I simply have no clue. Yours faithfully.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,532,032
== Turbo-compound engines == Thanks for your message. I know little about formula 1 or what they're up to these days. There's relatively little use of it in the '40s for aircraft and that's fairly well known - except the R-R Griffon, which had some experimental use as a turbo-compound but is still in the archives. What I can add is about the origins. In the 1930s, diesels were undergoing substantial development. High-speed diesels were having forced induction applied. Particularly in work by Saurer, there was an effort to see just how much boost was practical. In contrast to petrol engines, it was found that it was relatively easy apply a high boost of maybe 6 bar without problems such as detonation. These high boost engines were mostly using centrifugal superchargers. What then became a problem was how to extract mechanically all of the extra thermodynamic energy released. The engine was now running with an effective compression ratio far in excess of the piston's mechanical compression. Considering the piston power stroke as an expansion phase in a heat engine, there just wasn't enough stroke or expansion for the combustion gases to do enough work on the crankshaft! The exhaust still remained hot and pressured, with much of the energy still remaining in it. A solution was the turbo-compound. By running the exhaust through an expansion turbine, more of this energy could be extracted. Turbo-compounds were difficult though. Just coupling the fast turbine shaft to the slow crankshaft was a problem, especially as there really needed to be a variable speed drive in there too. What was realised though was that driving the mechanical supercharger required substantial power. About as much power as could easily be extracted from the exhaust turbine. So coupling one to the other directly provided a neat solution to supercharger drives, and avoided the need for turbo compounding the exhaust turbine. This was effectively a parallel evolution to the Buchi turbocharging system that had been tried some years earlier and would now become the dominant approach for supercharging large four stroke diesels at constant loads (Two strokes in vehicles usually stuck with Roots blowers, as they gave better scavenging at low speeds). As to the other matters, then yes, I've probably given up as a contributor to Wikipedia. One admin stated that it would be better if I were blocked than Betacommand and the other has told me that he considers me de facto banned anyway and will indef block me if I post to ANI again.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
627,539,762
== removing edits concerning air crash investigations and qualifying them as third class spam == Someone (AndyTheGrump) is accusing me of putting information about aircraft investigations as third class spam mail on wikipedia. This is outrageous and completely ridiculous. I am an aviation specialist, I was general manager of large airports (among others Schiphol-Amsterdam), a professor in economics (graduated Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1973))and a consultant for many governments world wide (a.o. Netherlands, Indonesia, Chad, Philippines) on issues regarding aviation. I am a registered transport consultant at the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.I can proof that on every account. The problem with aviation accidents is that every country makes it own report of the accident, many are not in English, not all use metric systems. Many reports are not easy to obtain, or simply (against all international rules) not available. This is very frustrating for people working in this field. Everybody likes to avoid the mistakes others made. Not everybody is American, there are also Asians, Africans, Russians, etc. who are entitled to the same knowledge as you and me. For this reason we publish for many years these reports all in the same style and the same format and all in English. This makes comparison easy. Aviation security and safety is not a joke. Because we are talking over small series and the information has to be available for many years we found the solution in publishing them as print in demand by lulu.com. I do not see what is wrong with this. Publishing via a normal publisher means that the series are too large, the books become too expensive (especially for third world countries) and after a certain time the publication is no more available. You should appreciate what we do instead of insulting us. You think we make any money out of this? Think about translation costs, not everybody works for free. This way you do not help wikipedia, but you are a stumble block. You are probably some kind of Johnny the Selfkicker. Dr. Dirk J. Barreveld, Netherlands ( )
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
627,542,186
` == removing aircrash investigation additions and calling them spam en third class publications == Someone (AndyTheGrump)is accusing me of putting information about aircraft investigations as third class spam mail on wikipedia. This is outrageous and completely ridiculous. I am a aviation specialist, I was general manager of large airports (among others Schiphol International Airport Amsterdam), a professor in economics (graduated Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands in 1973) and a consultant for many governments world wide (a.o. Netherlands, Indonesia, Chad, Philippines) on issues regarding aviation. I can proof that on every account. The problem with aviation accidents is that every country makes it own report of the accident, many are not in English, not everybody uses the metric system, there are problems in terminology, etc. Many reports are not easy to obtain, some governments simply refuse to make reports available for international students and/or mechanics in aviation. This is very frustrating for people working in this field. Not everybody is American, there are also Asians, Africans, Russians, etc. who are entitled to the same knowledge as you and me. For this reason we publish these reports all in the same style and the same format and all in English. This makes comparison easy. Because we (a number of retired pilots) are talking over small series and the information has to be available for many years we found the solution in publishing them as print in demand by lulu.com. I do not see what is wrong with this. Publishing via a normal publisher means that the series are too large and after a certain time the publication is no more available, they also become too expensive for people in countries that are not so ``blessed`` as Americans. You should appreciate what we do instead of insulting us, we are simply acting on requests of the industry. You are apparently some kind of Johnny the Selfkicker. Dr. Dirk J. Barreveld, Netherlands.`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
627,549,374
== Sources == Jessica's Sources: 1. King, S., & Saxton, M. (2010). Opportunities for language development: Small group conversations in the nursery class. Educational & Child Psychology, 27(4), 31-44. 2. 3.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
627,570,478
This is incidentally why turbo exhaust manifolds can run red hot (and why sodium cooled valves might be needed), yet their outlets don't and neither do normally aspirated exhausts.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
627,575,980
== Complete monopoly of pro Russian shitheads at the crimea article == Please fuck off back to RT
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
627,577,002
you fucking brainwashed vatnik retards
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
627,582,235
lol ernie the grouch
2,014
false
article
random
train
false
627,602,473
I didnt fucking change the genre, i just put commas in between them.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,602,866
==Ravenkills97== I didn't change the genres on In This Moment, all i did was put commas in between the genres. U gave me a final warning for no reason. All because I put commas in between something, like it fucking erases the genre.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
627,608,605
:Sorry Caden. I thank you for what you did on this talk page, which has lead my account to get unlocked. I haven't really understood what happened last week. I still don't get it. That experience was... Orwellian. Just like a real time experience of the dystopian world of Animal Farm. Back in 2007 when I took my distance from Wikipedia, I realized that the validity of your arguments is not what matters here, only the time you're ready to dedicate is important. When I've seen the article protected and took a glance about what was going on in the talk page, this appeared even more obvious to me. I shouldn't have tried to put my grain of salt, but the case seemed so obvious, at least to me, that I gave it a shot. The facts I've pointed out have not even been studied, and even less answered. I haven't understood all of what has lead to my unblock, but I thank you for your action.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
627,615,912
:::I know so well what is written above the edit box that I only performed minor edits to the article in the last 5 years. I appreciate you propose me to ask you a question and here there is: how an article can reach GA status with an unreadable Asperger-kind of list as the Landmarks by district section which counts no less than 431 links to random buildings? Please do me the favor to just click on the link, just to see if the peculiar Wikipedia culture still have connections with the interest of the reader.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
627,620,699
Dr. Balasubramanian Kalyanaraman Dr. Balasubramanian Kalyanaraman is an International Success Coach training people from India and Canada. He is known as Balasandilyan also. He is a doctorate in psychology and he had transformed many people. He appeared in many TV channels in Tamil and wrote hundreds of articles in many magazines in Tamil and English. He wrote 9 books so far. He is a member of many organizations and serves people with his intellect and coaching abilities. He is a certified counselor and his name is enlisted in the Most Famous People of Tamilnadu for the past 25 years.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,623,167
` Actually this is for AndyTheGrumpy or whatever he is calling himself. Somehow I can't get his own page or he is hiding because he knows very well what he wrote under spam on my page: I strongly advise you to stop spamming Wikipedia articles with your third-rate publications. This is an encyclopaedia, not a platform for the promotion of misleading self-published copies of official reports masquerading as books, and abusing our facilities in this way is liable to result in you being blocked from editing. While there is clearly little we can do to stop you promoting your ripoffs elsewhere, we are certainly under no obligation to permit you to do so here. AndyTheGrump (talk) is pure slander. You accuse an acclaimed writer (just check amazon.com or Barnes&Noble;) of writing ``ripoffs``, publishing third rate publications and ``masquerading`` etc. I can sue you for that. I did explain exactly why we publish these books but you seem to lack the level of understanding it. You hide behind childish names such as ``Andy Grump``, ``Streetwalker`` or ``I love horses``. What is that a children's playground? I demand within 24 hours an apology and putting back on the appropriate websites the additions I made. If not I will file a complaint directly by mrs Lila Tretikov Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. You know perfectly well that she does not need this kind of publicity from low level ants. Good day, discussion closed. ( ).`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,632,204
:: I can tell you what the argument is about here newseventsguy. It's about YOUR retroactive reversion of a simple edit trying to include secondary independent verification of sedimentary nanodiamonds in Younger Dryas sediments by Bement and Madden et al., WITHOUT DISCUSSION a reference that I notice has NOT YET been included in the reference list still, after all this time. This is after you ADMIT that you are ignorant of the peer review literature and the controversy. Any attempt to do simple reference list edits on this page have been stomped by no less that five admittedly biased and ignorant editors. The honorable thing to do here would be to recuse yourself from editing the page, as I have. But I haven't seen that happening until now. Good luck with it, you've already made complete fools of yourselves.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,639,110
Alejandro Cardozo (27), Alexia Ojeda (25), Milagros Otamendy (21), Agustin Calabrese (21), Eduardo Gimenez (27), Constanza Muller (27), Araceli Ceccotti (25), Mariel Zobra (21)
2,014
false
user
random
test
false
627,642,085
== That depressing feel when == you realize this guy is still alive
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
627,644,441
::Okay that seems to make a little bit of sense. I don't know if it will be aesthetically pleasing to have junction tables under each subheading in each article though, but it'll straighten itself out somehow.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,650,598
yearlings, hardly preventing anyone to edit it
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,651,645
* Support as per precedent described by OP (invited here by bot)
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,652,733
` fucking cops with no sense of humor. go fuck yourselves, go play ``quidditch`` you assclowns.`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
627,669,688
It also would benefit the article, if there was clarification of the timeframe that Charlie Wilson is investigated by Rudy Giuliani. It seems unlikely that Giuliani in his capacity as US District Attorney for the Southern District of New York (which is New York City) would have any interest, reach, authority or ability to investigate a US Congressman located in Washington DC and Texas. However, he was a Justice Department official in DC and led a drug investigation prior to this so maybe that is where his focal point of interest may have occurred. But for accuracy's sake that may be available in the book this movie is based on and less clear in the film.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,681,255
== Contributor copyright investigation == Superzohar, I am so sorry that you have been blocked from editing in Wikipedia. This is what happens when individuals are too lazy to edit and correct the copy-violations. They overzealously destroy half the articles or delete them wholesale, all in the name of copy-right standards. I suggest that you create different accounts and edit articles in the future. That way they won't destroy the hundreds of articles that you have contributed over the years.
2,014
false
user
random
train
false
627,691,865
== To the humongous faggot pro-russian administrator of the crimea page == The fock is there to discuss you RETARD. Fock off wikipedia and take your head out of Putins soviet ass-hole, maybe then you'll get an understanding that reality is different from what your dumb media and dumb russian friends are trying to portray on the crimea page, you focking stupid vatnik. I'm honestly surprised you got administrators rights, without it the article wouldnt have survived in the state it is now ass-hole. Suck my penor and choke on it, there is nothing to discuss except reverting stupid russian lies on that page. I hope you die in a fire sooner than you get to revert all reasonable changes bitch nigguuuh, fock you Also, please stop ruining wikipedia with your backwards russian culture. russia is crap, CRAP!!! and so are you
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
627,692,601
== To Ymblanter == Eat my dick asshole, there's no way to contribute when this user - Ymblanter is misusing his powers. Meet me irl so I can educate you, stupid mongoloid
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
627,696,006
Say Jytdog, off topic, but do you know what I can do about my contribution count in the pie chart of the data page? It seems that an vandal that changed Ebola Disease to Poo Poo Disease (on Sept. 21) has taken over my spot. My contribution number is, at least AFAIK accurate, and it makes it look like I make a lot of useless edits without getting much of anything done.
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
627,715,728
::::My mistake. Sorry about that. I confused you for another, since I had been writing a fellow by the name of Zach. Anyway, your advice is always a help. Thanks, again.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,752,366
== File renamings == Hi Courcelles. I noticed you do a fair amount of file renamings. Do you always check whether more edits than just a file renaming are needed? I'm asking because I just made this edit where I noticed that the image used in the Édouard Dujardin-Beaumetz article was showing his father Georges, not him. I was puzzled how this could have happened, and I noticed that the file was uploaded with the wrong name and you fulfilled a request on Commons to rename the file (I think the Commons page over there needs some corrections made to it as well). Do you then run some script that helps you fix the filenames here, resulting in edits like this? If you look at that edit, it makes no sense. You are renaming the file to a new name, but failing to see that what really needs doing is removing the image completely. Which I've now done. The edit history of that article shows that the article was created by in February 2012, and then added a free image (in April 2012) (but fails to see that the birth and death years in the filename don't match the birth and death years in the article - another automation error?). You (Courcelles) then change the filename used here from Édouard to Georges in July 2013‎. I then turn up in September 2014 and remove the image. So for 2.5 years we had this article with an image of his father and us saying it was an image of him? At least it's been fixed now, but it's at times like this that I dread to think how many other errors like this are out there that haven't been spotted yet. Are there ways to avoid errors like this in future, or even find the ones that are still out there?
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
627,754,513
` to Before I go any further, would the proposer please indicate that they intend to address these points. `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
627,776,364
` ==possibly contains original research?== This article's headline ``possibly contains original research`` is an understatement. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,784,252
. It is also listed on the wiki Edward Snowden page (date of publication also included there)
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,794,989
==MfD nomination of == , a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sbhushan/OIT and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,800,721
` ==Reviews & reception== Per , every review in the table should be discussed in the reception also. Removed these reviews accordingly: |Destruct = 8/10 {{cite web|url=http://www.destructoid.com/review-gauntlet-281594.phtml|title=Review: Gauntlet (2014)|work=Destructoid|date=29 September, 2014|author=Chris Carter|accessdate=1 October, 2014}} |EuroG = 6/10 {{cite web|url=http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-09-30-gauntlet-review|title=Gauntlet review|work=Eurogamer.net|author=Christian Donlan|date=29 September, 2014}} |GI = 7/10 {{cite web|url=http://www.gameinformer.com/games/gauntlet/b/pc/archive/2014/09/29/fleeting-fun.aspx|title=Gauntlet: Fleeting Fun|work=Game Informer|date=29 September, 2014|author=Daniel Tack|accessdate=1 October, 2014}} |GT = 7.9/10 {{cite web|url=http://www.gametrailers.com/reviews/c5p59l/gauntlet2014review|title=Gauntlet (2014) - Review|work=GameTrailers|date=29 September, 2014|author=Michael Huber|accessdate=1 October, 2014}} '''''' `
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
627,802,102
` : I would agree that ``a mess of examples`` is not a good thing. If you read the history and the talk: archives here, you might also note that I'm one of the editors who has been most active in removing such. : ``a broadbased consensus`` [to only] ``B & C``. Where? There has been no such consensus. : This article does not need a list of ``my favourite language``, but at the same time it does need true examples. Not as language samples, but as examples of what a Hello World program looks like, for the benefit of the general principle. Readers of this article need to see what such a program looks like, and (most importantly) why one would bother. Hello World in JavaScript is trivial - why would any programmer even care to write it? It makes much more sense for more difficult languages like assembler. : My edit was to re-add examples for JavaScript, Java and Assembler. I have no particular attachment to these languages but JavaScript is contemporary and as simple as it gets, Java is contemporary and demonstrates how a modern language might still need to be more verbose. Assembler is obscure these days, but it highlights just how much work can still be needed to get Hello World up and running. I believe these three limited examples convey something of value at the level of a general article on Hello World and thus belong here. : You also removed the note on the Arduino and the use of non-text output devices in the Hello World context. Why? : Finally, I'd point out that it's not Bold - Revert - Edit war again because I KNOW I'M RIGHT. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,812,635
:::No thank you. The nanodiamond problem will eventually work itself out with new atomic-probe tomography techniques and better sedimentary and meteoritic nanodiamond extraction techniques, and when and if Osiris-Rex ever returns some pristine carbonaceous materials that should provide some better selection of working materials as well. At best I am only willing to comment on new results, pro or con, when they arrive, here in these talk pages. The order of hypothesis rejection at this point needs to progress from 1) the sedimentary nanodiamonds do not exist, 2) these nanodiamonds are not real 3) the nanodiamonds are not impact nanodiamonds 4) they do not represent impact proxies and 5) there was not an impact at the Younger Dryas boundary. Many of the original points of the original hypothesis have already been refuted, and I have my preferred alternate already. Falsifying that has demonstrated to be a difficult and expensive long term task.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,813,252
::: I have no objection, other than a weak one to pointless churn, if someone replaces a comparable Java example with a C## one. Adding another example though would be a problem as it would fail to add any value from the standpoint of this article (Java practice is largely comparable to C##). You seem to have little faith in WP's ability to maintain an article. You claim that code can't be kept valid, you claim that having one example leads to a plethora. What evidence do you have for this, or that they can't be pruned?
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,827,445
:@: The The Black Monk of Pontefract and Lonnie Zamora incident are on my eventual to-do list. Any objective sources (academic would be great) would be appreciated. -
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
627,832,890
` ::I fail to see the huge difference between the two theories: The self-inflicted isolation (nobody forced the WMF away from the community, it was the WMF who chose the chasm between ``us and them`` voluntarily) makes the relationship between the WMF and the communities clear: they don't care about the communities, otherwise they would never isolated themselves. If they really thought they did useful work without consultation of their customers, the communities, they are not fit for the job. All those botched software implementations shows, they are indeed bad developers, because without consultation of the customers there can't be a good developer, that's an oxymoron. The pure hatred of the communities was made clear by the extreme brutality of Eriks putsch against the deWP, where he invented and implemented a new ``right`` just to make the wishes of the community never ever happen. He didn't move as far with enWP, here the ruthless thread of force was enough, but it was the same spirit: pure disdain and hatred of the communities. There is nothing ambiguous about him: he's not fit for any position in WMF because of his proven working against the communities. - - superputsch must go `
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
627,855,981
` God damn, it doesn't matter IF I DO provide proof. As you will put a pro-russian spin on it anyway. As you and your russian buddies did already numerous times. The reason this pro-russian bias on this article keeps reoccuring is because Ymblanter is an admin and possibly other pro-russian admins are allowing this. Also, your lack of understanding of a Neutral Point of View doesn't help either. Tricky situatian you got yourself into here, shame that I don't have the time or the motivation to meddle is pointless discussions with people who are brainwashed into thinking that they have nothing to do with Crimea by their own government. Just open any site that isin't Russia Today, and you'll see the real situation in Crimea and not what Ymblanter or any of your russian buddies are trying to portray here. I've had numerous discussions with pro-russians and I know that you don't have the capabilities to think by yourself, even If you had - Ymblanter would come in and adjust it to give a false impression of russian ``uninvolvement`` in the matter. Apologists, the lost of you Have fun posting propaganda, I've already informed other admins about this editing policy abuse `
2,014
false
article
blocked
test
false
627,861,071
::Agree. I don't see any edit-warring happening recently, and there's a pretty clear consensusas well as VAST precedentthat goes in one direction. ''''''''''
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
627,866,343
` == On wiki policies - ``No swearing edition`` == There is no point if you only look at my comments and pick policies to see If I adhere or didin't adhere to them. This whole matter would have been solved If I had admin rights: pro-russians would be banned and the crimea crisis article would have been spotless. But no, you just had to be cherrypick according to the rules and nothing else. I have no patience for policy abuse, yet every person that blocked me has. You should be ashamed, as the policies will never, ever produce a quality article by themselves. And refusing to do something about the crimea crisis article is much worse that blocking people who try to revert propaganda that the russians are faithfully and blantantly editing in. Even if someone is harrasing users (who harass others by ADHERING to the rules) RULES CAN BE MANIPULATED AND THAT'S WHAT THE RUSSIANS LIKE YMBLANTER ARE DOING, WAKE UP`
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
627,873,237
You can redact all you want newseventsguy, the demonstrated fact here on this talk page is that you, gaba p, skepticalraptor, Connelley and a wide variety of other wikipedia editors on this page are guilty of the exact same thing that you are complaining about, editing out contributions to the page WITHOUT DISCUSSION, multiple times over a long period of time, while admitting that you are not familiar with the peer reviewed literature. Look at the top of this page. What do you find? Discussion. And these are trivial edits merely attempting to ad secondary and tertiary peer reviewed references to the controversy. You are unable to justify that, so you just 'edit it out'. Feel free to add some credible discussion to this page if you can, but all you've been doing thus far is stifling discussion and removing credible scientific references from the page.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,874,117
` == Shame on you == In regard to your article about lambinowice prison camp in poland, I cannot believe that you fail to mention the treatment of the innocent german inmates past 1945, who were torture to death there by the thousands. There is much reason to believe that Wikepidia is blind on one eye. Since this is not the only ``incident`` in that regard, I see a policy there. Shame on you!`
2,014
false
user
random
train
true
627,903,209
:: If you had bothered to read the talk pages and discuss the proposed edits before you stomped them then you would have probably noticed that I have been discussing the article content extensively across three archived sets of talk pages, including this one. The problem is that since you and several other editors have demonstrated that you are willing to stomp any edits without discussion, which you and several others have done several times now, and then complain that the editors are not discussing the edits in the talk pages, which is demonstrably NOT TRUE, then nobody wants to edit the page anymore. I've consistently indicated my desire to discuss the content and have somebody else edit the page, but nobody wants to edit the page anymore because every single minor edit gets stomped without discussion, and then we have to endure your complaints and we can't fail to notice your complete lack of content discussion. Blah blah blah.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,903,336
== Selection Pressures == This article does touch on some selection forces such as eyespots allowing for circadian patterns, higher resolution aiding in survival/predation, and better recognition with color vision. However, I feel it has some gaps in evolutionary forces and their effects. I think the article could benefit from further explanation in the evolutionary baggage category. This topic is very interesting, but I think it could be more informational with some additions as suggested in the “Evolutionary baggage” category of this talk page. The article also points out that the earliest photosensitivity was developed aquatically. In addition to the light filtering effects of water, the refractive indexes would be different for an organism in air. I feel it would be a useful addition to include some information about how these forces worked on the original aquatic eye. == Moulting Example == I made an addition to the Early Eyes section. I was interested in how the layers allowing for specialization in transparent humour or air and water operation, could be involved in moulting. I thought it could be an interesting addition to include an example. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1502-3931.2008.00138.x/abstract;jsessionid=794AD37010C17B485C06DD42029A308E.f03t04
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
627,916,546
New mail as you have requested.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
627,925,117
= Adviretisement on Wikipedia == Hey Jimbo, I'm here to recommend an ad style. We need money to keep up the good work. Donations may not hold it still. We can't risk Wikipedia. So, instead of ad spots and annoying popups, we can take sponsors for external links. There are aready thousands of ad style links. Why not add one to links and support the encyclopedia. For example, game articles, they'd be an opportunity. Links like a Steam link will be enlightening too. You can count all commercial and information providing sites.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
627,937,435
:Aw, thanks for kind words! I've been slowly developing this article for the past two years now. This Wednesday (October 8th) is the 2nd anniversary of this article's DYK (also coinciding with the feast day of the cathedral's namesake). —
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,938,705
:Is nobody going to comment on this?
2,014
false
article
blocked
test
false
627,947,894
== WARNING: Never eat pie with beer == There is only one correct sweet to eat with beer, and it is chocolate. Repent.
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
627,950,606
:::: No, that's about it with me. Until you or one of the aberrant editors are willing to add the Bement and Madden et al. PNAS nanodiamond paper to the reference list, with discussion, or some other future primary, secondary or tertiary result is publicized on the nanodiamonds, AS I HAVE DISCUSSED, I'm not willing to either edit the page nor discuss this subject any further. This subject and several other wiki pages associated with it are already contaminated beyond belief or even bothering with by the primary aberrant editor. It's no longer worth anyone's effort to either discuss the problems nor edit the pages.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,976,627
I just removed the sentence altogether without rewording, since the source didn't say when the drilling and blasting started (only reports on when the tilting began). —
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
627,996,673
== Class numbers in the 70s? == Was 7* under TOPS reserved for electro-diesels or for DC diesels? Empirically, the Woodhead locos (76 & 77) do indeed suggest that the 7* series vs. the 8* series was for indeed for DC locos (catenary or 3rd rail). However I've never seen it claimed that this was particularly deliberate, whilst I have read that the electro-diesels were deliberately grouped in this range. Does anyone have a robust source? In the meantime I've reverted the change, mostly to avoid the redlink. If we do change this, the link ought to point to a section within the TOPS article.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
627,997,730
:: Chains are still pretty commonly used. They belong here. We also have morgen and acre-foot, but no acre.
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
628,009,961
Naushad Khan is an International award winner Artist & excellent Singer/Tabla/ Cajon player. . He has been honored on international level from many countries. With his very own energetic style ,he has been creating a unique while playing tabla and Cajon simultaneously . He has been critically acclaimed amongst all types of listeners and audiences.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
628,018,854
|currentstatus=GA |topic=Music }} == DYK nomination == {{
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
628,029,123
Yes. Acceptable. While Breitbart may not be RS for objective facts, a film review is - by its nature - not objective, but subjective. Everything is RS for opinion statements.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false