Datasets:
dirtycomputer
/
Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
630,902,064
== Not spam == My edit was not spam. Know why? Because spam is a advertisement by individuals or companies who make praising comments about their websites or products on the internet discussions. Stop being an ignorant.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
630,902,833
::@ Please I'm sorry. I won't attack anyone ever again I promise. I'll remain well-behaved and a constructive editor from now on completely. I will not make any more destructive edits ever I promise. Please unblock me I request you humbly. I sincerely apologise.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
630,902,858
to you and everyone else
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
630,906,908
` *John, I respect you hugely so I shall take your advice this time. I have no idea who you are, but do what what you like, I couldn't really care. Oh, and for your information, Paris had nothing to do with it, but thanks for the stunning piece of guess work 😏. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
630,907,527
I won't be appealing; not because I think that the block was justified (it wasn't), but because I can't be arsed.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
630,907,556
== You stupid nigger == You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You are a stinky face.
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
630,932,255
::: Funny how much you can write without providing useful information... As mentioned above, it is not OR. So, what was your reason to remove the sentence in the first place ?
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
630,943,384
` The Magisterium (MSC) was the commonly used acronym for the: About this sound Magistrate State Coun​cil or Magistrate for State Security). It was the national security agency of the Malusian Empire from 166 until the present, and was the premier internal security, intelligence, and secret police organization the empire. ===Mode of operation=== The Magisteruim is middle earth's most effective information-gathering organization. It operated residencies in subject countries where a resident gathered intelligence and are protected from prosecution by imperial immunity. At best, a compromised spy either returned to the barracks or was declared an incompetent and expelled from the service,imprisonment and execution is also resorted.In non subject countries as well as hostile territories The resident spied, unprotected by imperial immunity, and worked independently of imperial diplomatic and trade operations, (cf. the lone-wolf agents). In its early history, the Magisterium valued lone-wolf spies more than legal resident, because lone-wolf spies infiltrated their targets with greater ease. The Magisterium residency executed four types of espionage: (i) political, (ii) economic, (iii) military-strategic, and (iv) disinformation, effected with ``active measures`` (PR Line), counter-intelligence and security (KR Line), and scientific–technological intelligence (X Line); quotidian duties included SIGINT (RP Line) and illegal support (N Line).[4] At first, using the romantic and intellectual allure of ``The Guerrilla State`` (Gondorian Civil War 160-66), ``The Fight Against Insurgents`` (166-present), and the `` Great Unification War`` (170-215) the Magisterium recruited many idealistic, high-level citizens as seeing agents those who spied on fellow citizens The Magisterium classified its spies as agents (intelligence providers) and controllers (intelligence re layers). The false-identity or legend assumed by a spy was elaborate, using the life of either a ``live double`` (participant to the fabrication) or a ``dead double`` (whose identity is tailored to the spy). The agent then substantiated his or her legend by living it in public, before being destined to a target area, thus the sending of residents thru out the empire and rest of middle earth. Trade craft included stealing documents, code-names, contacts, targets, and dead letter boxes, and working as a ``friend of the cause`` or agents provocateur, who would infiltrate the insurrectionist groups to sow dissension, influence policy, and arrange kidnappings and assassinations. ===History=== The Magisterium was established to defend the Rebellion of Alus and his nascent Rebel Grand Army from its enemies,the Gondorian Old Republic—principally the Victorian White Army. To ensure the Rebel regime's survival, the Magisterium suppressed loyalist counter-revolutionary activity with domestic terror and deception. The scope of intelligence operations prompted Alus to authorize the Magisterium's creation of the First Division ( War-intelligence Department)—the precursor to the First Chief Division (FCD) of the Magisterium. In 166, Alus's regime fully organized the Secret Police Organization as the Imperial Magisterium (EM). The Magisterium expanded espionage from within and without the empire, and provided Alus with a personal bodyguard army the praetorian immortalist troops. The vagaries of Alus's strict rules influenced the Magisterium's performance and direction in the early stage of the empire, i.e. Elvish conspiracies. Acting as his own analyst, Alus wisely subordinated intelligence analysis to intelligence collection. Eventually, reports pandered to his conspiracy theories. The later history of the Magisterium culminates in the Great War of Conquest (170-215) imprisonment and killings of enemy civil, military, and government people found to be unwilling to submit to the new world order . Among those executed were former monarch of the gondor republic Queen Victoria (178) and Nikra Queen of Ferria (180); later, Lavania Emperor of the eastern elves (216) followed suit. In 221, under Queen Sadako, the Magisterium became the governing body of the newly established Eastern Dominion , integrated all imperial units in the east into the magisterium praetorian armies . Yet, the Magisterium wisely continued to be the Malus's personal army —whilst simultaneously achieving its deepest aspiration to be the master of the East. Next, Queen Sadako centralized the intelligence agencies, re-organizing the various echelons as the Directories. In practice making a magistrate head of a zone of operation typically provincial wide but on occasion a whole region ; intelligence operations are under the Malus's control; Magisterium's contribution to the peace and order of the empire is reliant upon residents- spies able to establish a more secure base of operations thru out middle earth. [edit] Magisterium in non subject nations Magisterium espionage succeeded most in collecting military and civil intelligence about advances in siege engines and smelting, which impressed Gondorium, but stealing portal system secrets was the capstone of Magisterium espionage against those nations wizarding technology . ===Magisterium in the occupied territories=== It was imperial policy for the Magisterium and the secret services of the subject-states to extensively monitor public and private activities, internal subversion, and possible revolutionary plots in the Dominions. In supporting those subject governments, the Magisterium was instrumental in crushing peasant revolts, and secessionist movements. During the post occupation period, Queen Sadako, personally supervised the post-invasion ``normalization`` of a country. In consequence, Magisterium monitored the subject-state populations for occurrences of ``harmful attitudes`` and ``hostile acts;`` yet, stopping insurrections,after deposing a native government, was its greatest achievement. War Operations,Eastern Front The Magisterium prepared the Imperial Army's route by infiltrating to the Eastern Theater many residents disguised as Western traders. They were to gain the trust of and spy upon the enemy governments. They were to plant subversive evidence, justifying the Malusian invasion, . Finally, the Magisterium prepared hardline, pro-Malusian members of the ruling class of the invaded nations, to assume power after the Malusian Army's invasion. The Magisterium success in the Eastern Campaigns was matched with the failed suppression of the Rebel secessionist movement in Ferria.Guerrilla Warfare hindered the Magisterium's destroying the nascent Secessionist-backed political movement, fearing explosive civil violence if they imposed the Magisterium-recommended martial law. Aided by their ferrian counterpart, the Słuvan regional government, the Magisterium successfully infiltrated spies to the Secessionist movement and their mass base ===Suppressing subversion=== During its reign, the Magisterium actively suppressed ``local subversion``—unorthodox political and religious ideas and the espousing rebels. In 187, the suppression increased under Queen Sadako, who said all rebellions threatened the Empire—including secessionist movements. Most arrested rebels were executed or sentenced to indefinite terms in Magisterium-administered forced labor camps—where their dissension lacked the strength it might have had in the open. After the victory of the Eastern Campaign, Magisterium Chieftain Sadako established the First Division to monitor insurrections and eliminate rebels. She was especially concerned with the Ferrian secessionists, ``Empire Enemy Number One``. Magisterium dissident-group infiltration featured agents provocateur pretending ``sympathy to the cause``, search and destroy campaigns against prominent insurgent fronts, and show trials and executions; once imprisoned, the rebel endured Magisterium interrogators and sympathetic informant-cell mates. ===Notable operations=== *With the Snatch Operation, the Magisterium successfully deceived some leaders of the Victorian White Guards back to Gondor for execution. *The Magisterium infiltrated and destroyed several Elvish rebel groups; in 190,a lonewolf agent assassinated the top Ferrian guerrilla leader. *The Magisterium favored active measures (e.g. disinformation), in discrediting the Empire's enemies. *For war-time, The Magisterium had ready sabotage operations arms caches in subject countries. ===Organization of the Ma
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
630,953,021
== Over lengthy == Sorry about the excessive length of my evidence. I hadn't realised that the limit included responses. Enough is enough; I have deleted the recent additions.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
630,970,409
` ::As I said in my edit summaries, consistency between articles matters. That's how Wikipedia works and lists are not an exception to this rule. Even if several references call System of a Down a ``nu metal`` band it does not mean it should be included in the list. Other sources clearly say this band is not a nu metal (see here). ::Also several sources used in this list are not reliable, and I really don't see what makes this first source, this second source or this third source (a clearly Googled search which doesn't even say the band 311 is a nu metal band) reliable. This list really needs some clean up anyway. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
630,975,859
:Incorrect. I've already edited (and significantly improved) several other lists before this one and these lists all feature representative bands for each genre/subgenre. Most artists included in these lists are correctly associated with the genre of the list they have been included in because several editors (including myself) took care about improving consistency between these lists and the musicians included in these lists. And this is one of the reasons why this list clearly needs to be improved.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
630,979,713
` :I've got to admit I don't care about SOAD and I don't even know if it is an actual nu metal band or not. The only thing I know about this band is that the ``nu metal`` label seems to be erroneous. I may be wrong, but that's what I read throughout archives. I also think other bands such as Sum 41 shouldn't be included in this list because they are only backed by one source or two. Just because one person decided to call them this way is not enough. What I mean is that a music critic can say whatever he/she wants about an artist, and sometimes using common sense is better to improve Wikipedia rather than using these sources in lists. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
630,993,699
== Do not attack to my Talk Page== You added the following to my webpage with the pretext of edit-warring with IP31. I made only 1 added to Trikomo article. Do not pollute my Talk page.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
630,996,058
The number of univ studs It increased from 110 to 114. Without any reference to further increase, the 114 must be kept.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
631,031,576
` ==Peer reviewing with some findings for you== Hi, thank you for creating this topic which is a nice and interesting one to know. I did some research on this ``kissing lovers``, here is an article about its analysis, it might help the viewer learn more about the background and meaningful facts. http://www.hoaxorfact.com/Inspirational/6000-year-old-kiss-found-in-hasanlu-iran-facts-analysis.html Moreover, University of Pennsylvania mentions that the University Museum has exhibited these 'Hasanlu Lovers' skeletons in 1974. You could also mention that in your article. http://www.upenn.edu/gazette/0702/timeline.html`
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
631,049,090
`:::The ignored my private email to them as well. In it, I pointed out that since I was unable to defend myself against some horrible little troll called who told me to go fuck myself in an edit summary and was grave dancing, perhaps they would be so kind to block them seeing as they were been incivil to me, like I was apparently to Caden. But no it appears that Future Perfect Sunrise has double fucking standards. It wouldn't be the first time in admin has displayed such disgusting double standards, and I'm sure it's not going to be the last. Future's Perfect Sunrise, it appears, is not so fucking perfect after all, and is instead a filthy overcast skyline full of hypocrisy and double standards. :::`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
631,049,837
` ::::* Hello , thanks very much for your post. The whole experience has not left me bitter as being so would mean that the trolls have won. I shan't return in a hurry as real life is a bit hectic for me at work, but I shall pop up towards George Robey's TFA to defend it against the vandals and POV pushers. I'm glad you liked my work, that means a lot coming from an editor such as yourself. I hope we can collaborate some day in the future. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
631,050,593
future then I would conduct myself in exactly the same manner
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
631,060,478
::I meant look among the files already on commons or in articles. If you want to uppload anything - ask Crisco. (That is why we pay him - Ok , just joking)
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
631,077,155
` == Papers ``written`` vs. ``authored`` == I reverted an edit that changed the word ``authored`` to ``written``, since the standard use on Wikipedia is ``authored``. To verify this, esp. with respect to academic mathematicians, I checked the pages of all Fields Medalists. The term ``written`` is used for books, Ph.D. theses, and collections of papers, e.g. ``three papers written ...``. In some cases it is also used for things which were written, but never published (a common academic use of the term). But in essentially all cases, published papers were ``authored`` or ``co-authored`` by these people. `
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
631,077,650
` ::::::::: Sorry, the wording did not come out right. With ``put at ease`` I was of course referring to the decision to block the user since their user info is clearly not right, not to the clinic's stated treatment schedule. `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
631,113,904
::Hi LamasUI. The red Xs indicate that the values that have changed since they were verified by editors that are working on Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Chembox validation. I think I have now verified the data and made the changes that have restored the green check marks, but it's been awhile since I've done that before so hopefully it will remain verified. As for the tag on the top of the article, that was placed by me. I put it there because I think the article relies to heavily on press releases. Generally, if information is not available from any source except through press releases, that information probably isn't appropriate for the article. If independent sources are reporting on or commenting on such information then it may be notable enough to include in the article. Also, I suggest you have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy which I suspect may apply here.
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
631,150,072
== What are you doing?? == The info you added does. not. reference. a. source. That's bad, bad, bad! Does anyone know even where this freakin' came from????
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
631,172,848
```I want to be a fuck you.`` That's a song. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
631,174,649
` ``I want to be a fuck you.`` That's a song.`
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
631,175,318
` :Also, why are we saying that the allegations against Quinn were ``proven`` false, when the only sources say that Stephen Totilo, Grayson's boss, said he didn't find any wrongdoing? I'm not saying we need to question his account, but acting as if his word is objective fact isn't neutral. There's also no mention of Grayson being listed in Depression Quest credits or his admission to having been a tester for the game. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
631,176,179
```I want to be a fuck you.`` That's a song. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
631,176,888
== Subject in National News (Today) & Real life hero in the latest book == http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/review-book-review-because-life-is-a-gift-2029186 http://epaper.dnaindia.com/story.aspx?id=72257&boxid;=123843&ed;_date=2014-10-26&ed;_page=11&ed;_code=820009&fb;_action_ids=882992575085124&fb;_action_types=og.likes&fb;_source=hovercard http://www.younews.in/news/book-review-because-life-is-a-gift-%7C-latest-news-updates-at-daily-news-analysis/ http://www.flipkart.com/because-life-gift-stories-hope-courage-perseverance-english/p/itmey8yzhuthecrh?pid=9789382665250&otracker;=from-search&srno;=t_1&query;=because+life+is+a+gift&ref;=25c382a2-4393-4865-b23b-6ac1182d98a3 http://www.amazon.in/Because-Life-Gift-Disha/dp/9382665250/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1413891789&sr;=1-1&keywords;=because+life+is+a+gift http://www.flipkart.com/because-life-gift-stories-hope-courage-perseverance-english/p/itmey8yzhuthecrh?pid=9789382665250&otracker;=from-search&srno;=t_2&query;=because+life+is+a+gift&ref;=68c8747f-a72f-4e3a-9319-909a7099c52d http://epaper.bhaskar.com/detail/?id=614312&boxid;=1010184933&ch;=0↦=map&currentTab;=tabs-1&pagedate;=10%2F10%2F2014&editioncode;=34&pageno;=2&view;=image&fb;_action_ids=870706636313718&fb;_action_types=og.likes
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
631,177,939
` ``I want to be a fuck you.`` That's a song. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
631,179,397
` ``I want to be a fuck you.`` That's a song. Open Proxy! Yes!`
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
631,180,099
```I want to be a fuck you.`` That's a song. Open Proxy! Yes! `
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
631,184,144
== I need your help please == Hi, I need your help in moving the Digital transition section of ABS-CBN Corporation article to DWWX-TV article. I think the section is more appropriate in the DWWX-TV article since it pertains to the flagship TV station of ABS-CBN. I am not familiar with moving a section although I have read the guide in moving a whole article unto another. I hope you can help me. Thank you. God bless.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
631,188,776
Looks good! BUT why Russian?? When was this printed?
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
631,189,043
More references http://www.brunchnews.com/dna-india/health/book-review-because-life-is-a-gift-1906888 http://www.veryinternationalpeople.com/lifestyle/Life/book-review-because-life-is-a-gift.c/ http://inagist.com/all/526207771734048769/ http://www.newswhip.com/India/Life Open this link http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/review-book-review-because-life-is-a-gift-2029186& Find in the right:: Most Shared Story in India (Today) for reputed media group DNA
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
631,191,475
` Please see ref 1, 4 , 5 & 6 of this article, mentioned by Wikipedia for Youngest Patent holder of India. Moreover I mentioned about news & latest book about real life heroes, by providing notable & reliable reference. Do not you feel DNA group is reliable & notable reference as Its page exists on Wikipedia. Do you really believe that, what ever or who so ever provide information for this article is having bad intentions. In your words sock/meatpuppets. Did i asked/suggested anything from you to edit or write. I am a free man to send information & You are a free person to analyse it. Are you above Wikipedia? When ref 1, 4 , 5 & 6 of this article, mentioned by Wikipedia for Youngest Patent holder of India for the subject..Why you speak in bad words...Your words verbatim ``Any book or review which repeats the ``India's youngest patent holder and the youngest disabled patent holder in the world`` claim that Bhati and his supporters are pushing fails as a reliable source.`` How can you discourage people from sending information, which is relevant, reliable & notable `
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
631,197,343
` == Kind Attention : Administrator Sir :Please protect people who provide reliable & notable information == Respected  ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yunshui Sir created an awesome articlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hridayeshwar_Singh_Bhati But you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NeilN are fighting, humiliating, insulting, abusing every one, who provides information on the talk page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hridayeshwar_Singh_Bhati You are determined to misuse your authority & you have a feeling that you are above Wikipedia or You are God..I never edited the article..That proves my intentions. Suggesting on Talk page or providing information on talk page``, never edits the article. & It is my duty to provide relevant, reliable & notable information. You might block me..Abuse me..But never forget, there is someone, who is above all of us. Moreover you do not have heart to understand the notability & reliability of the subject of the article. Unfortunately the greatest injustice to the subject is done by your cruel hands. You must be feeling great by using your authority against a disable kid facing death..You must cherish your success of demoting all the credentials, achievements of the helpless kid...You are above god...A Great person is Please see ref 1, 4 , 5 & 6 of this article, mentioned by Wikipedia for Youngest Patent holder of India. Moreover I mentioned about news & latest book about real life heroes, by providing notable & reliable reference. Do not you feel DNA group is reliable & notable reference as Its page exists on Wikipedia. Do you really believe that, what ever or who so ever provide information for this article is having bad intentions. In your words sock/meatpuppets. Did i asked/suggested anything from you to edit or write. I am a free man to send information & You are a free person to analyse it. Are you above Wikipedia? When ref 1, 4 , 5 & 6 of this article, mentioned by Wikipedia for Youngest Patent holder of India for the subject..Why you speak in bad words...Your words verbatim ``Any book or review which repeats the ``India's youngest patent holder and the youngest disabled patent holder in the world`` claim that Bhati and his supporters are pushing fails as a reliable source.`` How can you discourage people from sending information, which is relevant, reliable & notable `
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
631,205,214
` First of all It was not me who created this article Wikipedia made this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hridayeshwar_Singh_Bhati It was not made by me nor created by me...Obviously it was created by Respected  ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yunshui Sir. But you are determined to spoil the article. You will never understand that the ``Family member`` quoted by you is 'Subject of the article in Wikipedia``. Demoting/Abusing/Demeaning/Dejecting the subject of the article of the Wikipedia is also a disrespect for Wikipedia and disrespect for the administrator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yunshui sir If you are that much annoyed with the subject or if you do not find the subject of the article as notable, reliable enough...Why do not you delete this article...After all you are above god...Above Wikipedia...Above administrators. A PIECE OF ADVICE FOR YOU...IF YOU DO NOT CONSIDER THE SUBJECT OF THE ARTICLE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hridayeshwar_Singh_Bhati, NO LE, RELIABLE...PLEASE DELETE IT...Why you are bearing this article..Why you are abusing/insulting everyone. If you do not find the subject of the article ..Worthy enough..Go Ahead & Delete it. Otherwise learn to respect the people who respect the subject of the article of Wikipedia. Subject of the article is not our family member..But the subject of the article is related to Wikipedia. My relative or your enemy does not matter..What matters the most is that the Subject exists in the article of the Wikipedia. Obviously the subject is related to Wikipedia..Never insult/demean/deject/demote the subject..It is insult of Wikipedia also..Put a big ? over the person who created it. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
631,208,741
` See your language first ``a source of unthinking hype and puffery you want to turn it into``. Only you are the god of knowledge & every one else trying to contribute to this article is a fool..Suggesting/Informing on Talk page is not the interruption of work but purpose of it. Moreover I am/Rather no one will be eager to contribute anything to this article as you are an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent & I am a big fool in front of you. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
631,209,509
` You said ``What happened to your desire to ``quit Wikipedia officially forever`` + ``not your Facebook page`` etc No one will be having stamina to bear Insults by you. Believe me if this is the modus operandi by you..Not only me/Rather every one will be least eager to contribute to Wikipedia. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
631,210,918
, always a total asshole
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
631,211,714
` Just look at this total self-centered idiot posing in a photo booth - ``I'm a marine, a hard guy, and an intellectual. I can juggle plates on my Johnson, I can do anything.`` Total sad guy. How self obsessed can you get? `
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
631,212,156
`You think he is awesome because you ARE ``Tony The Marine`` - you are sending messages to yourself Tony under various names, and I can prove it. If, by chance, you are not, you are certainly fabricating all manner of stuff to make yourself look great. What a very sad individual with all manner of mental health problems. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
631,212,412
` Warning - great: awarding ``stars`` to yourself Tony. Readers: read the following with great caution. Do not believe a word of it. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
631,213,631
`==Tony The Marine== You deleted my additions to Tony The Marine's self-centred badly sourced and self serving talk page. Why? The Talk pages are a place to sort out people like this - self-appointed just wrong neo-fascist ill-educated Wikipedia Fascists. In any event, what right do YOU have to edit/monitor what people contribute on a talk page which is exactly the place for people (good or bad) to criticise? Who elected you? Who educated you? It's all ego. Who awarded you a platinum star - Harvard? Cambridge? Sarbonne? I've been and taught at all three and can prove it - what right have YOU to rule Wikipedia? I don't have the right - and don't want it. I just want free speech and comment on a talk page -read what it says: ``talk`` that's what talk is all about. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
631,213,991
` Respected    Sir See the way behaves. Even in the ``Tantrums`` like mentioned by you sir these Please analyse the conversation. Respected Sir I never edited the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hridayeshwar_Singh_Bhati Whenever i felt to contribute to the article I did the same on the talk page & insulted/Abused Please check records of the Talk page of the article. He never listens He never understands It is better to get blocked then to bear torture/insults/abuses from him & That too for providing notable & reliable information related to the article of the Wikipedia. I Challenge him to justify all the reverts & deletion about the subject of the article to other knowledgeable people of Wikipedia. He not only insult me but he also insults the subject of the article, & The article was not made by me but was created by respected   YUNSHUI SIR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yunshui Do not you feel sir, insulting/dejecting/demeaning the subject of the article is not only insult to the Person who created it but also to the Wikipedia. I request the other knowledgeable people of Wikipedia, including the administrator & creator of this article, ``Respected   YUNSHUI SIR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yunshui to please ask him to Justify & Clarify, Why he hates contribution..Why he insults the contributors...Why he does only four things on this article..Insult contributors + Delete/Revert Everything contributed + Insult/deject/demote Subject + Misusing authority by using weapons Sock/Meat/ETC (When he is not able to face truth). Regards `
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
631,215,021
` :You are wrong in saying ``Other, experienced, editors have been dealing with your disruption and contributing``. ..Only you were busy deleting/insulting/reverting/Misusing authority on this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hridayeshwar_Singh_Bhati I invite respected administrator sir  ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yunshui Sir & Other people of Wikipedia to verify the same. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
631,219,800
:She was the root cause, but the case isn't entirely about her. Why are you so condescending in all of your edits?
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
631,227,582
with Wikipedia's voice
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,232,475
::What kind of answer do you expect from me? IMHO Wielka Encyklopedia Powszechna settles this thing. If you have stronger encyclopedic sources, please list them all here, and then we will continue our discussion and reach consensus. With regret, but again your comment with at odds with our No original research principle.
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
631,249,922
` == I don't think you got the point! == I don't think that you have got the point! This Century Plant Guy or whoever he/she is most definitely NOT . This user has only done one edit on some stupid plant I never even heard of and his/her password is definitely NOT peter660 or horse-cordial3, so how they can be a so called ``sockpuppet`` of McAusten? Can you actually verify this user's password and contributions and I can pretty much super duper 110% from the swear of god that this Century Plant Guy is really, really, really most definitely NOT McAusten! Please, I kindly request that you delete or remove this from . If you refuse to do so, I will refer you to the ombudsman. Thank you of your time, .`
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
631,251,051
:::I have changed it back to prose, but tried a different format to try and limit some of the uniform repetitiveness of the bulleted list. -
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,268,611
*This is my original account that dates back to 2007, but I have used a few other accounts before due to either forgetting passwords, forgetting that this one even existed, etc. I'm generally pretty civil, but genuine frustration due to other users being hostile in an issue I care about caused me to snap in a moment of weakness, and I can admit that. There is a genuine cause for concern for the lack of neutrality on the Gamergate page as well as the conduct of some of the editors on the talk page, but as you said it's probably best I just wash my hands of the whole thing for the time being.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
631,270,412
::I can accept the topic ban and understand that my conduct was unacceptable.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
631,271,961
:::Sounds like a deal. Thanks for hearing me out.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
631,282,462
:The article looks great, congratulations to all contributors. So, let me see if I understood it well, you are now proposing to expand this article into a Serbian-Albanian rivalry, or create a separate article on that subject? Humm...
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,303,696
` == Wrong information in the article == There are many wrong info in the article. Here are the followings with proofs from various sources: 1. Government and Politics: Article:Due to Northern Cyprus' isolation and heavy reliance on Turkish support, Turkey has a high level of influence over the country's politics. This has led to some experts characterising it as an effective puppet state of Turkey. Sources:1 24.05.2012: ``In the 1995 and 1996 Loizidou Judgments the ECtHR treated the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) as a sort of puppet government whose acts fall within the jurisdiction of (and are attributable to) Turkey as an (unlawful) occupier.`` 2 09.01.2013: ``The situation with the South African homelands was similar and so was collective non-acceptance of the turkish puppet-government in northern Cyprus which has resulted in the turkish republic of northern Cyprus not being recognized as a state.`` 3 27.11.2005 ``It may be argued that the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which was declared in 1983 and which was only recognized as a state by Turkey and for a short period by Pakistan, is at the moment of writing the only existent puppet state in the world.}} Few political decisions in Northern Cyprus are taken without the approval of the Turkish National Security council in Ankara`` 4 04.09.2004 ``The TRNC is not only heavily dependent on Turkey for funding it is also administratively tied with the Turkish institutions so that in some respects it gives the impression of being a province of Turkey... Most profoundly however in ways that are always strongly felt in north Cyprus but are not always evident to outside eyes, it is Turkey that calls the shots.`` Realities: 1. USA Federal Court (09.10.2014): ``TRNC is a democratic republic.`` (Official summary of Court decision; website of Court decision; Decision of Court) 2. European Court of Human Rights accepted all laws of Northern Cyprus without any exception: Not only the laws of ``Immovable Property Commission of Northern Cyprus (and its related laws)`` but also all laws of Northern Cyprus without any exception are recognized at European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR): ECtHR Decision 02.07.2013, App. nos. 9130/09 and 9143/09; Pavlides v. Turkey; Georgakis v. Turkey http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{``fulltext``:[``Pavlides``],``documentcollectionid2``:[``CASELAW``],``itemid``:[``001-122907``]} ECtHR: ``...notwithstanding the lack of international recognition of the regime in the northern area, a de facto recognition of its acts may be rendered necessary for practical purposes. Thus, the adoption by the authorities of the ``TRNC`` of civil, administrative or criminal law measures, and their application or enforcement within that territory, may be regarded as having a legal basis in domestic law for the purposes of the Convention``. Note: In the related above case, the application of Greek Cypriots was immediately found to be ``inadmissable`` by ECtHR and rejected by ECtHR! That is to say, the applicant Greek Cypriots were expelled just at the beginning of the process. Case was never handled by the ECtHR! 3. The number of university students in Northern Cyprus is more than 70,000 (a country with 300,000 population). There are students from 114 different countries. Northern Cyprus is the top 1 country in the ratio of univ.stud/population in the world. How can such a country be ``heavily dependent`` on Turkey? 4. The number of annual tourist visits to Northern Cyprus is more than 1 million (a country with 300,000 population). Northern Cyprus is among the foremost countries in the ratio of tourists/population in the world. How can such a country be ``heavily dependent`` on Turkey? 5. Northern Cyprus has its own Dollar Billionaires. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
631,339,119
== I'm back motherfucker == MRivera25
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
631,340,743
== OK IM SORRY == IM SORRY OPAQUEVODVILLE
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
631,347,182
` :And what is most worrisome about this, it that this SPA shows no signs of understanding of what he is being told. Observe his edit on Modern History of Cyprus on 14 October and his edit on the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Representative Office to the United States on 27 October, where he adds the largely identical text: despite being told by T*U on on his talkpage on the 15th of October that this text is a gross misrepresentation. In all my years here I have never witnessed such obtuse obstinacy, except by socks of .   `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,350,021
You blocked my friend and Jiminee Crikit appoligizes for his unnesecary edits (his words) he would say this himself, but he is unable to post on your talk page. Bob the Builder71
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
631,350,312
Also, he is a bad person
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
true
631,350,527
` :::This is plain misinformation. Thank you IP editor for your corrections. Please let me know if you encounter any problems. I'll keep an eye on this in any case.   `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,394,381
::Thanks for the review and the encouragement. I don't like to recruit DYK reviewers as that often comes to look like one hand washing the other, but I may let you know if a nomination is languishing in the queue in the future.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
631,402,288
` == Energy and environment discussion == Ok, lets break this down by section. What's wrong, it's cited and all. What's the issue here? Naming group awards is the norm in other articles. `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,414,510
` :::::it says under = = influences = = ``Psychoanalyst Joel Kovel has praised Bloch as, ``the greatest of modern utopian thinkers`` so i will remove the material from the lead entirely because it is elsewhere `
2,014
false
article
random
dev
false
631,425,295
==Talkback== Not to mention the requests here for responses, which you've just deleted. •c)
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
631,437,214
== Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States == Hi, Please don't delete info from the chart, at least not without discussing why you're doing it. From here, it just looks like censorship. —
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
631,442,358
::::: TRNC is not in quotation marks in that Court decision!
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
631,449,360
== King Parahu and Queen Ati == Are these two individuals actually refereed to with words for King and Queen. Or are we just assuming their King and Queen because of their apparent roles in the reliefs?
2,014
false
article
random
train
false
631,462,808
==Sockpuppets blocked== Major Torp, I am blocking your sockpuppets, except for Koldewe, since you declared that one. When I saw you pushing an anti-gay agenda on Tchaikovsky I knew Septimus Wilkinson would become active on Rimsky-Korsakov and I didn't have to wait long. Please read our policy on sockpuppetry and observe it. Thank you. (And yes I know there are more, some that you haven't used for years.)
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
631,463,589
How do i message you back
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
631,495,057
:: ? it has nothing to do with genetic modification.
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,500,938
== No action on vandalism this time? == Why decision to take no action on vandalism? There's been more vandalism since report below yesterday. * – On Jewish population by country (): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. See My PS was answered about RFCU, but what about the vandalism? I'm guessing you didn't mean to take no action on that, as you blocked before for the same edit. •c)
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
631,507,880
` ==Talk:Female genital mutilation; please stop== Hi Elvey. I noticed you on Johnuniq's page, which I watch, and was moved to check out the discussion at Talk:Female genital mutilation. Your part of it worried me. While I have no opinion of my own on the statistics, as FGM is not a field I've studied, I see two principles in play on that talkpage, that are true for all articles, and that you seem to pay scant attention to: *1) Use reliable secondary sources. It's important (for all articles, but more especially for a sensitive subject such as FGM) to be based on reliable secondary sources. Synthesising sources in order to argue, in Wikipedia's voice, with a UNICEF report from 2013 isn't on, unless you have a reliable source (as opposed to having your own synthesis and conclusions from sources) that offers the same argument. *2) Consensus. Nobody (except partly Vetrisimino0) agrees with you about how the stats should be represented in the article. There is consensus against your section tags, described here as ``overly aggressive``. I hope the issue of the tags has blown over, but a few days ago you kept restoring them, and defend them aggressively; the fact that the article is being prepped for WP:FAC seems to anger you further, and makes you accuse SlimVirgin of WP:OWN: a serious accusation, which shouldn't be made without good evidence, and which you have taken to SV's user talkpage as well. Combative and unresponsive discussion sours the editing experience for other users. Everybody else is speaking respectfully to you, as far as I can see; you're the one that has been upping the temperature with posts like this, where you call Zad's comment ``blatantly untrue, not to mention insulting`` — based, as far as I can see on a mistaken notion that he was impugning some arithmetic you had done (he wasn't). That kind of response reminds me of the old adage about the internet being populated by sensitive and angry people, ``eggshells armed with hammers`` (Google tells me it was originally said of heavily armed but lightly protected battleships). Please don't jump so quickly to the conclusion that people are insulting you. Worse, your header here is a noxious bad-faith-assuming personal attack, something to be scrupulously avoided in section headers. And you put it as the header to a post by SlimVirgin, which you had moved there from your own talkpage. That is truly awful behaviour, seemingly designed to discourage others and chase them off. (Charming edit summary at your own page, btw.) If you can't stop yourself from getting angrier and angrier whenever you're contradicted (this post, aggressively attacking Johnuniq, is a charming recent example), I advise you to take a break from the article. That's advice. What I tell you, as an uninvolved admin, is that you must stop filling the talkpage with rehashing of arguments that have not carried conviction before, and you must stop attacking people. Your accusation against SlimVirgin that she is ``abusing her position as an administrator to gain advantage in a content dispute``, currently at the bottom of the page, is made up out of whole cloth as far as I can see. Has she mentioned or hinted at being an admin, or warned you in any way? If I've missed where SV is playing the admin card, tell me where. The word ``disrupt``, which she used and which looks to be the basis of your accusation, is by no means _ the prerogative of admins. | . ::I appreciate that you are trying to improve the encyclopedia by dealing with the conflict at FGM by taking the discussion here. I wish you'd participate in the discussion of the facts instead. I feel that in coming here, you raise/reiterate some good points, but I don't think you should be raising the first few, at least, here: ::``*1) Use reliable secondary sources.`` (emphasis is in the original) I totally agree, and I said that in the discussion, ``The sources are given and reliable and secondary.`` and ``Also apropos ``Anything about prevalence needs a strong secondary source,`` are you saying that the source we're using for reporting the UNICEF stats in the first place is better? It seems that a UNICEF annual report is a strong source when it comes to what other UNICEF reports say.`` So then why are you here on my talk page ``informing`` me of the need to Use reliable secondary sources? That's a serious question. If you're going to warn me like that, why should I keep reading? I'm fucking sick and tired of this: If there's been a shred of evidence presented that I'm insisting on relatively unreliable sources, please point to it and I will eat my words. You just said that if you're going to levy an accusation, you should provide evidence, but you haven't followed your own advice in this case, have you? ::Re SYNTH: ````The retrospective periods involved (that is, time lags). For instance, in the case of a country where girls are cut before 1 year of age, most girls in the youngest cohort (15 to 19 years of age) are generally reporting on an event that took place 14 to 18 years previously. Any change that occurred after this period will therefore not be reflected in the data.`` is supposedly SYNTH, but as I noted on the talk page, it's A DIRECT QUOTE FROM A RELIABLE SOURCE. The accusation of SYNTH was made. Consider this sequence: I explained why there was no SYNTH, and the explanation received no response from the accuser. Later someone else accused me of SYNTH, but without any evidence or acknowledgement of my explanation. Later you accuse me of SYNTH in the same way. And that's supposed to accomplish what? That's very poor communication. Why don't you respond to my explanation as to why there was no SYNTH? You say I'm ``getting angrier and angrier`` and yet that sequence seems rather designed to make one ``angrier and angrier``, wouldn't you agree? ::``*1) Combative and unresponsive discussion sours the editing experience for other users.`` I totally agree, and likewise, have made pretty much that exact point re. the FGM talk page. :: ``WP:OWN: a serious accusation, which shouldn't be made without good evidence`` I totally agree. Have you an opinion on whether there are signs of OWN? I didn't know it was being prepped for FAC and don't much care, and it didn't drive the OWN accusation... and why would you even make the accusation that it drove the OWN accusation? It seems pointlessly accusatory. ::You say, critically, that I ``defend [the tags] aggressively``. Is there no room for defending legitimate use of tags? Why is there no acceptable way for me to point out that I was using them for what they were designed for? ::In any case, I will try to take a break and return with an enhanced effort to hear and speak better than it feels like others hear and speak to me. Thank you for your effort. If you're willing to engage in constructive dialog, great; theres more in your original post (``Everybody else is...``) to discuss. If not, please just go ahead and block me for a week or two now. Oh, and if you're not Bishonen, don't butt in. {{U|}} •c) :::No, I will not get into a content discussion — ``participate in the discussion of the facts instead``, as you say. I'm surprised you should ask me to, after you have been complaining (quite unfairly) that SlimVirgin had mixed the roles of editor and admin; you are apparently aware of the distinction between the roles and the inadvisability of mixing them. I'm wearing my admin hat in regard to this article and no, I'm not going to participate in the discussion on Talk. It's your conduct that concerns me. I notice you have nothing to say w r t my specific complaints on that score above — the personal attacks and other disruption — excepting that you take issue with what I said about using reliable sources. I'm sorry my explanation there wasn't clear: I was trying to say, you must use reliable sources, as opposed to synthesising sources in order to argue, in Wikipedia's voice``… ``unless you have a reliable source (as opposed to having your own synthesis and conclusions from sources)`` for the argument you make. OK? You need a reliable source for the argumant you make. I didn't mean to say your sources were unreliable, but that you used them wrong: you synthesised them into an argument, your argument. See WP:SYNTH. Sorry it wasn't clear. :::I'm afraid you'll have to discuss content issues with the other editors of the article, not with me. Please try to engage them respectfully. | . ::::I'm afraid that I see that your answer to the questions I've asked, about your opening points regarding RS and SYNTH, means we won't get to the crux of the matter: I see that you think that you did answer when you said I ``must use reliable sources, a
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
631,511,546
:I've blocked you indefinitely as not here to build an encyclopedia. That said, the above writing style is highly distinctive, and I'm reasonably sure that you're a sock.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
631,518,459
man you trying to shop for people to help you edit war, that's wrong. see cathy talk page consensus meet a long go and it is what the refs say.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
631,525,940
` :::: Thanks for the link. Interesting reading. I was only ever aware of ``42`` in context of a country being declared Ebola free eg. Nigeria. I had assumed it was just double the maximum 21 day incubation, in case someone either recovers or dies without being diagnosed you have double the maximum and 3-4 times the mean. And indeed this very reference supports my theory stating ``42 .... is twice the maximum incubation period``. But then goes on to up-end the 21 days by saying ``98% have an incubation period that falls within the 1 to 42 day interval.`` and 95% 21 days. What is interesting is these exact numbers appear in NEJM but the conclusion drawn in same paper is that there is no need to monitor beyond 21 days. What I don't know is whether the 95% probability stems from the lack of confidence or accuracy in the raw epidemiological data, or is a clinical/biological fact. They don't say. Nigeria was very effective in quashing it in Lagos (20 million people) after the highly infectious index case by being very aggressive in monitoring a large number of contacts (more aggressive than the US as far as I read) ... but only up to 21 days. My understanding from reading some of these epidemiology studies going back to 1976 is that the mean is around 8-10 days depending on outbreak, and that actually if you are symptom free for 2 weeks past last contact you most likely will not get it but the third week is for insurance. I have not read of any proven confirmed case with symptom onset longer than 21 days past last contact. They studied this in great detail in the initial outbreaks back to 1976 including a nurse that had a needle stick so they knew exactly when she was infected. My impression was the raw data is case-by-case and they delete or otherwise lower weightings on unknown outcomes. IMO any implication in WP that you could possibly incubate longer than 21 days has to be well supported (in data and conclusion by several sources) since it would definitely cause new consternation. `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
631,532,706
== edit warrer == why you go and try to recruit others to help you edit war? now you stalking people? man you need to step away from the internet
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
631,532,837
so you admit you recuitying to push you pov and then try and change the subject. man you shoud not edit
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
631,532,933
== edit warrer == why you go and try to recruit others to help you edit war? now you stalking people? man you need to step away from the internet rms125 braking the rules, you got cauight trying to recuirt for edit war
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
631,538,636
how am I harassing/stalking. then someone lied saying I remove stuff when not true. did not even look at links edit warrer even linked to shows he rms was the one the scratched my post and then deleted not I
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
631,538,746
. then say I was harassin others??? who???
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
631,568,023
. EAT S HIT N IG GER P ILL NEVER STOP F U CK ING UP YOUR G AY LITTLE F AG GOT WEBSITE s u ck my c ock
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
631,568,132
`::::The cited source says ``Infibulation is practiced largely in countries located in northeastern Africa: Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sudan.``, the article content says ``Over eight million have been infibulated, a practice found largely in Djibouti, Eritrea, Somalia and Sudan.`` The article content summarizes the source accurately. This is at the end of a paragraph that talks about prevalence, and doesn't mention rates at all. Chance of misinterpretation is below the threshold of what's reasonable. What is the problem? `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
631,569,750
Note: This section is clearly intended for conversation between John and I, Zad68 won't move or let me move his comment (below) out. -Elvey
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
631,569,790
` :Heeheeheeheeheeeee! With me, always wise to check for the equine connection first! LOL! `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
631,577,095
`::::::::Did you just straight up cite a Wikipedia page to justify them not being reliable? There are a total of 6 controversies on that page. If you look at the New York Times page, there are 7. As far as I know 7 is greater than 6. Anyway, citing Wikipedia is the clumsiest and weakest proof I've ever seen. Please show me concrete scientific proof that Breitbart is not as reliable as any of the other sources that are being cited as ``reliable``. I'll wait. `
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
631,578,027
`::It's all laid out in a short(!) post at , which is a link I provided from my AIV post. I considered the edits vandalism because you had already done so (reason you gave for block of IPs performing the same content edit: ``Vandalism``.) No big harm came from your deleting the report without taking action, since the user has finally been blocked, for socking, along with Harronn, so this is all just FYI. (Initially, I was a bit disturbed, wondering why on earth you'd deleted the AIV report without taking action or explaining!) •c) `
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
631,582,313
:Check the edit history. It's 50 pages, per the article that is reference #1. So there's apparently a page or two that haven't been made public. I uploaded a bunch of them to commons, and some of them were deleted including 1 that was not a duplicate, but it's since been restored. We're getting closer; in April, this article had only 38 entries.•c)
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
631,582,617
I warned the user who replaced 50 with 48, but it seems I didn't revert... till now.
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
631,582,973
== Puppetmaster == Any idea who the puppetmaster is of those two sock accounts you just blocked, F.leviadin & Harronn? (And kudos & thanks for the blocks and reverts.) I'm curious: Other accounts, IPs and a /24 are involved, so would an RFCU to find the puppetmaster be in order?•c)
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
631,585,830
` == AfC notification: Draft:Book Industry Charitable Foundation has a new comment == I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Book Industry Charitable Foundation. Thanks! `
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
631,598,184
Has anyone uploaded the relevant images to commons yet?•c)
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
631,609,439
== dick face == go fuck your dick
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
631,609,539
I rule this place
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
631,618,829
happy October 2014 everyone. hope its a good October 2014 for everyone.
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
631,620,346
== This article needs an infobox == This article is in dire need of an infobox. It goes to show that Corbett OWNS this article and that Cassianto stands by with his pitchfork when Corbett is not available. I'm surprised at an admin (Bencherlite) getting involved and going against community consensus. Millions of articles have a infobox and THAT is a consensus.
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
631,622,088
` An infobox should be used to allow a casual reader to gain facts without having to read the boring text. ``Your`` article should have one. This needs an infobox!!!`
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
631,626,022
== mother fucker == fuck off dick face
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
631,629,805
`:I wish you had done as I asked, when I said, ``...please just go ahead and block me for a week or two now``. Thank you for at least doing so now; better late than never. I won't respond to the rest of your post, as clearly the 5 ``bad phrase`` examples and the block show I am not allowed to defend my actions, or point out improper actions of others, as when I do, I am blocked for it; you've clearly shown that I can't do that so I won't attempt it. PS I am sure you don't see this block as being done at my request; no need to point it out. •c) `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false