dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
632,354,884	Thought your contract was up last December? If anyone cares to know why this article is as ignorant of reality as it happens to be-the editor above is 100% responsible as it was a full time job to create such a biased propaganda piece.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
632,355,440	This page is bought and paid for by the US government. It was the full time job of multiple government consultants to insure it is, was and always will remain a fantastical piece of government propaganda.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
632,355,888	Excellent work here George! Between you and Fleishman et al, you've done a wonderful job advancing your agenda here as a full time job for years on end. Keep up the great work! Only an imbecile having followed this since it's inception would conclude otherwise.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
632,359,500	Why the fuck do you keep changing it dick	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
632,359,870	You need to stop changing everything Im doing I had a bad day today and I do not need you changing things around if you cant make my day better Thx dick head	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
632,360,163	what the hell is your problem dumbass	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	true
632,360,397	You did make a mistake I think I know more about Ciara Bravo than you do so why dont you just fuck off Im not fuckin playing Ill fuck you up	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
632,372,073	Everything is fucking	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
632,380,214	A Disney Production Studio?	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
632,381,014	Big ears teddy should't see this.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
632,394,151	Debarshi Kirtania Debarshi kirtania one of the name who is struggled the past life , to increase the present life..now he doing a job with AstraZeneca in bangalore	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
632,395,145	` == Recreate the picture of Yamhill, EM64T and IA-32e == If I have never argued with professor Jen I would never have the will to guess how to recreate picture of Yamhill, EM64T and Ia32e. Yamhill is the code name of a project for ever Intel's own 64bit x86 processor, EM64T is a technology to extract the most potential capability of IA-32, making it to address up to 64TiB physical address. IA32e is not a mode of Yamhill processor, but the superset or extension of IA-32e, in other words, when ia32e enabled 32bits and 64bits codes could work seamlessly, because ia32e scale up the original IA-32 by extending the width of registers and execution units, extended segment descriptors and paging mechanism would also introduced with it. IA32e does not make a processor turn into a real 64 bit processor, but just make a 32 bit processor has the capability to do the 64 bit computing from the ground. The benefits of this is that we don't have a second 64bit-lised IA-32, what we need is an architecture completely designed for 64 bit computing from scratch, for example Itanium or something else. Janagewen on travel — Preceding unsigned comment added by === Segmentation or Paging is the Essential Way for Physical Addressing === Intel 8086 is the very first processor in the x86 series, it has only one mode, real mode. And this name was later found in 80286. So segmentation had been accompanied with x86 processor since its beginning. Without protection mechanism introduced, segmenataion is the only way to address all possible and potential physical space. Because Segmentation is found in the real mode, so addresses in Segmentation tends to be real, with solid link the physcial address rather than virtual address when in protected mode when paging is enabled. So if it is a real x86 processor, its maximum physical addressing space should be limited by its segmentation mechanism rather than paging.`	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,401,134	=== Protected Mode and Long Mode === Protected Mode was first introduced in Intel 80286, providing mechanism protecting resource and assisting multi-task OS such as UNIX, OS/2 and so forth, and enhanced in Intel 80386 processor by extending computing capability to 32 bits from 16 bits, eventually becomes part of IA-32 architecture. Most x86 OS only running within protectected mode such as Windows NT, Linux, and so many BSD distros; but MS-DOS working under real mode, some extender might switch through and back from protected mode for extending physical memory addressing, likewise, Windows 3.x also transit itself from real mode and protected mode thorugh and ack too. Windows 9x not only depends the real mode as bootstrap, but also sits itself from and to that mode. Long Mode is a kind of protected mode, not a real mode, but does not belong to the Protected Mode in IA-32, switches itself out of IA-32 dominated Legacy Mode, to a completely self-contained mode, which means even though a x64 processor eliminates its legacy part, it would be fulfunctioned. From the aspect of implementation, or Microarchitecture level, the legacy mode codes could share the same physical execution resources designed for the x64 codes, without needing additional physical execution units for itself, like it found in early Itanium processor. So IA-32 architecture might or might not have relationship with x86-64, x64, AMD64 or Intel64. === IA32e and AMD64 === AMD64 is a switched-out architecture from IA-32, providing compatibility mode to support most IA-32 software and representing itself in the Long Mode within AMD64 processors. It is a new architecture, even though most lying on IA-32 architecture. IA32e is not a mode, but an extention of IA-32, or newer revision of IA-32, introducing 64-bit computing capability for its fundemental architecture. Intel EM64T is the new brought feature to this kind of processors, enabling it for 64-bit computing. Of course, EM64T is not a mode too, but a feature like PAE, could be enabled to extend the 64-bit computing capability. Without EM64T enabled, Yamhill processor would act like a tradtional Pentium 4. After EM64T enabled, 64-bit registers would be visible to applications. 32-bit traditional OS might need minor fixes to support applications referring 64-bit registers to do the 64-bit computings, but programmers must take care of the computing results without intervented by other processes. But most likely as it in PAE, OS might need a patch to support this feature totally, at least to manage the extended descriptors and extended 64-bit registers and stacks and so forth, but without needing to compile the OS from the scratch like it in AMD64. Virtual Address might be extended up to 52 bits, while physical address up to 46 bits. 16K segments of 4GiB could be spreaded to 64TiB physical space, with or without paging. Because the difference between 32bit and 64bit computing is bit width of register rather than the whole system, so 32-bit and 64-bit codes is also differentiated by the referenced resgistered without needing a submode, such as compatibility mode to support tradtional 32-bit software. After EM64T disabled, Yamhill processor would act like a Northwood Pentium 4.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
632,414,510	` == Arbitration case request(Gamergate) declined == An arbitration case request(Gamergate), involving you, has been archived, because the request was declined. The comments made by arbitrators may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee, `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
632,427,967	:Thank you. If you track back beyond Rms125a's cavalier edits to the page you will find that all the revisions I made were scrupulously referenced. It is a pity that Rms125a's actions weren't reversed previously. If I can find the time I'll get back to it.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,443,907	November 2014 (UTC) ::: Do you have any insight into my idea? Would that work / have you ever seen this policy/guideline I seem to be thinking of? - 17:41, 4	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,446,544	`::::Oddexit is right; the source supports ``racial harassment``, not ``workplace harassment``. I would bet that this news article is a better source for this topic, but nihongono wakarimasen (I can't read Japanese) •c) `	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
632,449,252	== Discussion == Hey. I just wanted to say that, in a discussion that I think was overall filled with a lot of silly arguing and unjustified bittnerness, the back and forth we just had at Talk:Worcester was refreshing in its civility and for what I feel was a pretty rational discussion of the points. Thanks for that!	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
632,471,267	Hahaha you thanked me 😅 I know when someone is being deceptive like you mister......... I know I'm 16 but seriously any need.....	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,471,456	Who even are you, and why are you talking to me?	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
632,472,250	I am a registered sex offender and I like to touch myself in public places	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
632,473,793	Ok maybe I was wrong? I'm sorry for what I did mate please don't take what I say seriously at the end of the day I'm only 16 and I have just lost my best friend to a car accident 😔 please forgive me mate 💜	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,476,388	`, 4 November 2014 (UTC) *Moving of copying content to WN and removal from this article are independent and are not mutually exclusive. Hardly anybody writes for WN and even fewer read it. Maybe nom can copy the section, when it was broken down into days' activities, but to remove the content from this article now would be inappropriate and damaging to this article. 22:11`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,487,444	== Introduction of sources that may not be reliable == I recently copyedited the sources for this page and I noticed that this constructive edit introduced a couple of sources that may not be rock solid.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,506,332	== This is more proof of the rampant anti-Semitism on Wikipedia. == Anti-Semites are allowed to censor the truth.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
632,511,436	` ::I agree with Demiurge1000. Stanistani, please lift the ban on the account ``bryansee`` on Wikipediocracy.com. I have no intention of posting what you unilaterally deem as unsuitable material. And you don't aware that the clear signal sent by admins on behalf of BatteryIncluded have a ripple effect throughout the Internet. You don't seem to distinguish the meaning of life and death of people on the Internet. And don't do anything to harm/destroy my computer with input device-disabling malware. Let me make myself clear about Wikipedia: * The administrators and editors alike have turned Wikipedia into an online totalitarian regime, and no one has done a darn thing about it if they don't want to be immediately killed, beaten or received intimidating death threats. BatteryIncluded, Dennis Brown, AGK, and Boing! said Zebedee are said to be a part of them. They tend to use misleading and incivil statements as credible, accurate and correct. They also tend to use personal attacks and outs people as well. This is why they hate them as well. :* This explains cabalism in Wikipedia as well. :* This explains the unevenly enforced, extreme and heavy-handed rules enacted by the Wikipedia community, BatteryIncluded is such a prime example. Others outside Wikipedia really want to worship these rules as well - BatteryIncluded's ally ``forcedmemefred`` is the first one - trying to protect Wikipedia from external harassment. * Wikipedia editors, such as died last April in a rock-climbing accident. Although a loss for Wikipedia, her death might have been deemed by the Wikipedia community as a ``human sacrifice``; BatteryIncluded and his people perceived it as she's ``well``, meaning that she has cured her paranoia. This may apply to me and you as well, as we have signed separate death warrants. I think I have to say that, will not cure paranoia, instead it will be deadly to people. I guess that Wikipedia is not the only one, but also Wikipediocracy (by as Zoloft), Encyclopedia Dramatica and Know Your Meme (via forcedmemefred). :* I think this is the fate that you are going to face later on, especially you are taking actions therein that are aimed at Wikipedia, just as what I've did. :* And, these events have signalled a neo-luddite sentiment against computers and other devices that has the capability to connect to a network given these events, namely computers being the cause of people's paranoia deemed by BatteryIncluded, forcedmemefred and his subordinates. Given the fact Wikipedia is being used to spread malicious code and has the tendency of giving people malware, this is the case for BatteryIncluded as he does to the computers of many users he is dealing with. * BatteryIncluded is really the worst one I've ever seen on the Internet. :* He gives people kittens. ``Kittens`` may be a bomb with a intimidating death therat. The kitten that BatteryIncluded sent me might be a bomb. And is thought by BatteryIncluded to contain kittens. :* He has the reputation of distorting people's histories. :* He has the reputation of sacrificing humans via increase in their medication, as well as making death threats in the guise of ``seeing a doctor/therapist`` advices, as well as inciting neo-luddism against computers. :* He is the source of inspiration of admins and activist alike making personal attacks and acting unilaterally to ban people. * Every page on Wikipedia is outrightly misleading, and ``truth`` is based on whoever edits last. This is why Wikipedia is unreliable in many days, and is a lost cause. So, you still ignore my comments there, do you, Stanistani? `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,511,665	== Problems about Wikipedia == On this on the talk page of , I've outlined the problems Wikipedia is having right now, particularly the one who goes by the name of , the admins, and their unilateral actions based on misleading, unreal, yet credible facts. I think it's the time for you to read it.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,511,976	== Jewelpet == You should probably make a request at WP:AN for a WP:Range block. Make sure to list several of the IPs. , ,	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
632,512,024	` :: You are not telling the truth. If I am going to be sanctioned for telling the verifiable truth, so be it. The RFC/U was unwarranted and was done in complete bad faith. It was biased and there was nothing kind about it. It was a lynch mob and a bad faith pretext to call me all sort of names by a (very) small number of editors on the RFC Talk page and no one was ever sanctioned. You wanted your own ``local`` club and your (very) small consensus playground in the article. You did all you could to push me away. Well, you succeeded, and I have completely stayed away from the article even though I have exceptional knowledge in it, because of you and her. I don't have time for this but I am sure that time, and other editors, will expose all. Have a good night and try to enjoy life and let others enjoy theirs. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,512,203	You both seem to have a pattern of systematically violate policy and then say sorry. This has gotten too old.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
632,512,558	Also, you don't need to scream at be with bold letters. I stopped doing when I realized how it affected other editors. You are still doing it.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
632,513,382	::: Yes, PC123ct1, I remember, and I remember how someone, who I will not include now because he has backed off, wound you and put you against me. In any case, I am out of here. Have a good night the both of you. Enjoy life!...	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
632,521,547	` like this edit that you made today for some self-serving agenda, when the admin expressly stated ``No further edits should be made to this page``.`	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,555,765	` ::::::::So when are we going to have the benefit of your constructive criticism with the continual insults and provocation? Ever? `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,576,569	:::Oh, look, , they also messed with Stoning, just an hour after I removed the full protection. I've removed their tags and semi'd for 3 months. \| .	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
632,583,442	` == Memorable Gaffes by country section == An utterly non-encyclopedic section that is really just a coatrack way to list non-notable or non-context events. No sourcing or anything helpful to back up that these are more ``memorable``, if anything it is just what happens to be more recent. If anything, it needs to be trimmed only to gaffes that have their own page. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,584,260	` :Unsurprisingly, trimming it down to only gaffes afforded their own page leaves very few. The article is much better served by discussing the topic and mentioning cases in context as they show up, rather than having a section that is based on what an editor may have an opinion is a particularly ``memorable`` one (especially since there are a few hundred gaffes reported every single month, as far as I can tell). `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
632,596,631	` :*If the point of the house style is that ``an adherence to conventions widely used in the genre are critically important to credibility``, and we are choosing not to follow these conventions widely used in the genre, what is that actual logic? `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
632,599,345	Apparently, Aquaman decided to write a wiki article about a muscle relaxer.	2,014	false	article	random	dev	false
632,601,241	` ::::::Stop trolling Warkosign, no one likes your politician, ``I am the consensus``, ``you mad bro?`` shit. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	true
632,611,719	` == Some baklava for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| You're doing great! \|}`	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
632,613,974	:That's a poetic nickname.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
632,615,696	```penis`` and ``faggot`` vandalism, `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	true
632,617,986	*Question Is this the clear primary topic over Chengguan, Chamdo, which is evidently also referred to as Chamdo or Qamdo?	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
632,618,415	*Support Normally we don't just base moves of an official name changing but rather how the common name is used among reliable sources. However, I believe and a search seems to confirm that this has been the commonly used name for a while already, so it's really not an issue. thumbnail	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
632,622,969	:*Pinging or .	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
632,626,015	== Thanks == Thanks for sorting out that blocking error. Looks like you just became an admin, so congrats on that!	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
632,626,228	Regardless, Wikipedia is a construct based entirely off of what sources we consider reliable on the subject say. To move away from that for titling remains illogical and is counterproductive to goals of credibility.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
632,633,462	== Just because you disagree does not mean you can misrepresent == I am removing the material that creates an unbalanced article. Articles are not meant to be opinionated and clearly GoblinFace has an agenda. Please stop undoing my edits. With my edits, the page is more balanced and reflects that some people disagreed with Stevenson.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
632,648,517	I think LuckyLouie and GoblinFace may be the same person. Anyway... This article is not about Reincarnation. It is about Stevenson. Second, these are your opinions of the research and the idea of reincarnation. You don't have the right to impose them on an article about a person.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,648,936	LuckyLouie, you and GoblinFace are the ones who keep undoing my edits. You are engaged in the edit war as much as I am.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
632,649,357	LuckyLouie, to actually reflect the views of the scientific community, as you claim to do, would require a body of scientific research that disproves reincarnation. Stevenson has amassed a huge body of research that suggests it. What actual research is there that disproves it?	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,651,332	== Also used as a Masonic Lodge... == According to the Old Newark website (see here) 810 Broad Street in Newark, New Jersey was also the home of two masonic lodges, Eureka No. 39 and Orient Lodge No. 51 under the supervision of the Grand Lodge of New Jersey F. & A. M. My question is can the Old Newark website be considered a proper reference to use on Wikipedia for this information? I would appreciate if someone could give clarification. Thank you.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,652,933	` :::None of you is addressing my reason for trying to balance the text. Furthermore, I did not start the process of undoing edits. I am merely trying to create a BALANCED article. The fact that it is well-sourced is irrelevant if the material is just cherry-picked to discredit Stevenson. The material I deleted is there because of your so-called ``debunking`` agenda. You clearly have an axe to grind on Stevenson and are unwilling to listen. Instead of admitting your bias, you hide behind Wikipedia norms of consensus, and condescending lecturing. Instead of actually engaging in a discussion about the content we are disagreeing over, you want to simply keep ignoring my arguments. Admit that you have an ideological agenda and please go grind your axe somewhere else. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	true
632,655,829	Ah...due process. Blocked without anyone actually looking carefully at what is going on. First I am blocked by repeated undos of my edits, then the lovely skeptics complain (I can't call them tr***s). And does anyone see an effort on their part to address my concerns? Not so far. Just condescending lectures about policy. Oh, and blocking prevents me from discussing anything except here, so that's helpful.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
632,663,452	REDIRECT Talk:Nothing But Love (disambiguation)	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,663,758	::And now I've located confirmation of the act of the 3rd session of the 1st Congress on the date in question. http://docsouth.unc.edu/imls/22conf/1863stat.html#p167 So the Semmes account must have the wrong year.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,675,449	::::::::Their opinions may not be facts (obviously), but the fact that these (relevant) people have claimed such-and-such is a fact. As such we can report it.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
632,678,257	== citations == Hello, thanks for your edit here. I noticed you didn't use , which is considered standard. This app can help you speed up the process. Happy editing,	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
632,681,239	== get lost pinethicket == mind you own business and stop changing my edits I can edit whatever and whenever I want you don't like it say it to my face	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,681,774	== who asked you fourviolas == pinethicket has had some disagreement with my edits its between him and me so keep your big nose out of my business you Christian scum	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
632,696,961	` (UTC) I've also noticed this conflicting information. Both skinks AND geckos can't both be the most diverse. I'm changing this to ``one of`` for now since it seems to be in accurate. 14:50, 6 November 2014`	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
632,705,752	::*Apology accepted, ! Mistakes happen, and in the scheme of things this one was sorted out pretty quickly, so don't feel too bad. Thanks for the apology though! Cheers,	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,723,800	` *Oppose - The current title is overwhelmingly preferred by the policy of using the most common name, and the manual of style specifically encourages editor discretion. The MOS is great for our writing style and when the official or common name might be unknown, but to argue that it should be used to take an official name with a specifically chosen title that is used by the absolutely overwhelming majority of reliable sources, including books, newspapers, and websites, as well as is the generally common name is fairly absurd. Our title guidelines and policies are unfortunately somewhat murky. But, what it comes down to can be gleaned from Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), which states that ``an adherence to conventions widely used in the genre are critically important to credibility``. If Billboard is using a style, and Rolling Stone or the New York Times or Spin or just the bulk of reliable sourcing in general largely use the official title, is it really common sense for us to be saying we shouldn't be following the sources here in order to somehow adhere to conventions and gain credibility? Wikipedia is a unique construct in that our work is so clearly tied and based off of reliable sourcing about the subject making us stand out and go against the grain here just doesn't make much sense.There's also just the general notion (which certainly should not be the deciding factor in finding consensus) that certain lowercase words just look weird in titles. Perhaps this may give some indication as to why ``like`` and other 3 or more letter words are very often capitalized in composition titles but words like ``a``, ``to``, or ``and`` often aren't. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,724,193	:*Two points - 1) You normally don't need to give a !vote on a requested move that you've nominated. I don't think it's expressly forbidden or anything, but especially when it's not the first comment it gives an impression that more people are involved in the discussion than there actually are. 2) I believe you've misread my comment expressing support.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
632,726,392	-actually Mike I have no affiliation with them except for the fact they are my main store I use for all my fly and info. They are the largest fly catalog and inventory of a store anywhere. Wikipedia is totally devoid of a bunch of important companies....if youll notice i was trying to start pages for scott lamson sage(farbanks) tibor ect. The problem with the industry is a bunch of people not knowing anything about the options and the few people who do like to browbeat people who dont know info but dont make it available to them. So no I am not spamming fly stop. They just happen to be where I started because they are closest my list went flystop, hatch, abel reels, farbanks lamson scott....as I was going geographically from me.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
632,733,513	:*I'm sort of confused by what you're saying. Sure, you improved the disambiguation page, and that's a good thing. But it's not like its state before you made these changes was particularly messy, or screaming out that it needed to be changed to be functional. There's a billion and one different things that need improvement in Wikipedia, but that doesn't mean that all other changes must be held off until those happen.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,736,608	` == Propose a title change == The term ``silent intifada`` seems to be mostly coming from the pro-occupation media and the articles discussing this ``silent intifada`` seem to leave out mention of Israeli attacks, mobs, in Jerusalem. Not only is the current title partisan it is also not the most popular description for the subject. I feel, and google tells me, that simply ``Jerusalem unrest`` is the most popular, and neutral, description for the current events. So I propose that someone moves the article to ``Jerusalem unrest``. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,737,377	:*Then you should probably go to October 2014 Jerusalem vehicular attack and ask for the page to be moved to October 2014 Jerusalem car accident as the driver's mother disputes that there was an attack.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
632,738,049	` ==Chace Community School== You need to cite sources for this. What is ``Lads``? Most English speakers would not know. For lists of people, they need to have their own page with few exceptions. See WP:LISTPEOPLE, WP:WTAF. Also, your link to Thomas Carroll is a Help:Disambiguation page, not a person. Make sure that the article you link to does state that he went to Chace, or add a citation. Thank you `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
632,742,498	` There is a Request for Comment about ``Chronological Summaries of the Olympics`` and you're invited! `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
632,752,092	== Some Third-party opinions == I've been asked to provide a third opinion on recent disputes. Here goes: #Do you understand why File:Grand Kudu, Eritrea.jpg was deleted, Vetrisimino0? I'd like to hear that you do; you should after a read of . It seems the deletion was appropriate. (And, it's reversible with permission logged via an [[Commons:OTRS\| OTRS ticket].) #As for the suggestion to From just reading this page, it looked like this had been settled, and the photos are to be left in and photos of members of other groups can be added over time (and there have been multiple other editors providing opinions already). Good. I would add that images should be shrunk or (better yet) merged, as at [:File:Eriamercol.jpg], so that this can happen. However, I see File:Traditional_Eritrean_dance.jpg has replaced Tigrinya Eritrean wedding picture File:Eritrea_Eritrean_wedding.jpg. Is this a problem? I don't know the ethnicities of the photographed parties. I haven't looked through the article's edit history and don't plan do. #*Flickr has lots more appropriately licensed files. I see File:Rashaida_family.png is on the french article, so there are photos available. #Re. Faytinga photo: I think it should stay. Re. The mayote site seems to be a mouthpiece for a particular set of politicial views, so I don't think it's a reliable source for much other than its own views. (My opinion would be swayed if it had a written fact-checking policy.) However, given 3 other sources Vetrisimino0 says confirm Faytinga's mother's ethnicity, it seems reasonable to belive it's true. Can you accept that, Middayexpress? If not, I still think her picture merits inclusion (without noting her mother's ethnicity) and 'clutter' is a poor argument for its removal here. #I do wish to point out that a blanket order to a fellow editor like is highly inappropriate and invalid here! The WP:BOLD guideline applies to, and allows, such edits. However, so does the part of BOLD that guides one as to how to react when one's bold edits are not left in place. So, in other words, both of you should read / review WP:BOLD. (I see no argument for an exception to BOLD.) So, hopefully both sides will accept my opinions, and move on to edit on other topics within and without Eritrea. There are points where I have agreed with each of you and points where I have disagreed with each of you (two each), and I believe I've been able to be fair and impartial. Hope that helps.•c)	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,752,711	PS As for the coffee... Both photos are technically about equally poor, but good enough for use in an article. File:Coffee_ceremony.jpg is superior, subject-wise. so it should stay in. •c)	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,758,098	:::*Then considering that no independent expert, no one without an interest in not being responsible for having blown up children, you agree it is ridiculous for us to place the killers denial on par with those experts who pulled pieces of Israel bombs out of the victims.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
632,758,629	** But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you block him before it's too late?	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
632,759,369	and revert his edits	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
632,759,909	But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you just block him and revert his edits before it's too late?	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
632,760,504	:@: But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you just block him and revert his edits before it's too late?	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,761,575	(which could have been lost forveer)	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,771,243	`==NPOV== The sentence gives the false impression that reasonable minds consider it an acceptable practice. The idea that quote stuffing is ever acceptable is one that departs significantly from the prevailing or mainstream view. As WP:PROFRINGE notes, ``if the only statements about a fringe theory come from the inventors or promoters of that theory, then various ``What Wikipedia is not`` rules come into play.`` Also we have blogs used as sources in the HFT voices section, but nothing from or even mentioning Nanex / Eric Scott Hunsader e.g. http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4670.html (and http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4594.html)? •c) `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,776,723	== MAYBE YOU SHOULD READ OVER YOUR MESSAGES == It's blatantly easy to see your big head is getting in the way of others hard work. Wikipedia needs less of your bigot 'intuition'. Many people are upset with your work, pull your thick fucking skull in before someone else does it for you.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
632,777,359	== Hi Jim1138 == Before you move your mouse over the delete button, have a think about this you arrogant neckbeard freak. Take in what others have said about you. They are not happy with your deletions of their righteous work. How about I go through your edits and revert them back to their previous forms, stating that you need viable evidence to back them up? Or, how about this one; KEEP YOUR DECISIONS UNIFORM. It is that hard?	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,777,639	== ON A SIDE NOTE == Stop being a little cry-baby and grow up. Stop complaining to your administrators behind their computers. I'm sure you're a grown man. Grow up and act like one.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,783,136	`Hendrix British singles chronology ``Fire`` (1982) *This doesn't make any sense. The article on that song, ``Fire (The Jimi Hendrix Experience song)``, lists the release as 1969. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,789,757	===Closing comment=== Reviewer Squeamish Ossifrage hasn't edited on Wikipedia since October 2. As this review has been abandoned, the nomination is being returned to the reviewing pool, where it will hopefully get some attention.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
632,791,168	Where is box of frogs on the discography?	2,014	false	article	random	test	false
632,806,542	:, I don't believe there's any prohibition on it. It does seem to be a fairly common occurrence and normally no issue is raised about it. If you can point to a policy or guideline that says otherwise, of course, that would be different.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
632,807,229	:::It's neither common practice nor accepted practice to discount the opinions of IP editors.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
632,810,217	Cut-and-paste move on Kravica massacre	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
632,837,897	OK, now I understand. http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-01/wikipedia-getting-worse-it-gets-better	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
632,838,975	== Update == Hi. Could you update this information to Longevity claims page. Manuel Carrasco Rodríguez from Panama has passed away 27 August 2014 . I also found an article a man who was born in Swaziland but died in South Africa. Sant Pikinini Malunga-Maseko (16 July 1894 - 13 April 2012) .	2,014	false	user	random	train	false
632,841,223	== If you look at my edits... == ...you will notice they are helpful.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
632,841,884	== Die == I HATE YOU PRICK YOU DINT DESERVE A PLACE HERE	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
632,843,834	`:::Oh, I know all about that - I used to have access when I worked at Salford Uni. If my employers had known how much time I spent on there they wouldn't have been too happy. `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
632,847,130	== Proposed Section Change == The Concept section seems to me to be misnamed. It doesn't really explain the 'concept' it seems to really explain more the criticisms of FM methods. I propose that we 1 - create a section called Criticism or Treatments and move the bullet points there and 2 - Make the Concept section about the actual concept of FM	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
632,849,439	== I used the file 1968_AMC_Rebel_Station_Wagon-GoldWhite.jpg for another wiki == Hey, I used one of your photos for my wikia about an own video game. I credited you of course, just leave a message there if you don't want me to use it. ) http://gta-lost-episode.wikia.com/wiki/Basher_XL	2,014	false	user	random	train	false
632,867,527	== Before the Play == An editor has been reinserting unsourced information that was challenged in part because of its lack of sourcing. Please keep in mind that WP:BURDEN stipulates that material that was removed due to sourcing concerns should not be reinserted without any referencing. BURDEN trumps WP:PRESERVE. I would also remind editors of WP:BRD - the matter should now be discussed here before additional changes are made. Thank you.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,868,708	== Flag == The kingdom of Sicily did not possess a Flag; It possessed numerous CoA's and Flags according to its respective rules; Because of the factual correctness: Flag deleted from info box	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
632,874,427	::Due to recent edit warring of photo back into article, I raised the issue at the BLP noticeboard for additional opinions.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
632,878,579	:No, because there are no RS attesting to the validity of data correlating brain size to race. While many sources may opine that significance exists per various data sets, none are reliable...that is, since no editorial board of any peer-reviewed science journal has yet taken such sources seriously enough to publish or engage them in published dialogue, neither should Wiki.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false

632,354,884

Thought your contract was up last December? If anyone cares to know why this article is as ignorant of reality as it happens to be-the editor above is 100% responsible as it was a full time job to create such a biased propaganda piece.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

632,355,440

This page is bought and paid for by the US government. It was the full time job of multiple government consultants to insure it is, was and always will remain a fantastical piece of government propaganda.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

632,355,888

Excellent work here George! Between you and Fleishman et al, you've done a wonderful job advancing your agenda here as a full time job for years on end. Keep up the great work! Only an imbecile having followed this since it's inception would conclude otherwise.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

632,359,500

Why the fuck do you keep changing it dick

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

632,359,870

You need to stop changing everything Im doing I had a bad day today and I do not need you changing things around if you cant make my day better Thx dick head

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

632,360,163

what the hell is your problem dumbass

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

true

632,360,397

You did make a mistake I think I know more about Ciara Bravo than you do so why dont you just fuck off Im not fuckin playing Ill fuck you up

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

632,372,073

Everything is fucking

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

632,380,214

A Disney Production Studio?

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

632,381,014

Big ears teddy should't see this.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

632,394,151

Debarshi Kirtania Debarshi kirtania one of the name who is struggled the past life , to increase the present life..now he doing a job with AstraZeneca in bangalore

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

632,395,145

` == Recreate the picture of Yamhill, EM64T and IA-32e == If I have never argued with professor Jen I would never have the will to guess how to recreate picture of Yamhill, EM64T and Ia32e. Yamhill is the code name of a project for ever Intel's own 64bit x86 processor, EM64T is a technology to extract the most potential capability of IA-32, making it to address up to 64TiB physical address. IA32e is not a mode of Yamhill processor, but the superset or extension of IA-32e, in other words, when ia32e enabled 32bits and 64bits codes could work seamlessly, because ia32e scale up the original IA-32 by extending the width of registers and execution units, extended segment descriptors and paging mechanism would also introduced with it. IA32e does not make a processor turn into a real 64 bit processor, but just make a 32 bit processor has the capability to do the 64 bit computing from the ground. The benefits of this is that we don't have a second 64bit-lised IA-32, what we need is an architecture completely designed for 64 bit computing from scratch, for example Itanium or something else. Janagewen on travel — Preceding unsigned comment added by === Segmentation or Paging is the Essential Way for Physical Addressing === Intel 8086 is the very first processor in the x86 series, it has only one mode, real mode. And this name was later found in 80286. So segmentation had been accompanied with x86 processor since its beginning. Without protection mechanism introduced, segmenataion is the only way to address all possible and potential physical space. Because Segmentation is found in the real mode, so addresses in Segmentation tends to be real, with solid link the physcial address rather than virtual address when in protected mode when paging is enabled. So if it is a real x86 processor, its maximum physical addressing space should be limited by its segmentation mechanism rather than paging.`

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,401,134

=== Protected Mode and Long Mode === Protected Mode was first introduced in Intel 80286, providing mechanism protecting resource and assisting multi-task OS such as UNIX, OS/2 and so forth, and enhanced in Intel 80386 processor by extending computing capability to 32 bits from 16 bits, eventually becomes part of IA-32 architecture. Most x86 OS only running within protectected mode such as Windows NT, Linux, and so many BSD distros; but MS-DOS working under real mode, some extender might switch through and back from protected mode for extending physical memory addressing, likewise, Windows 3.x also transit itself from real mode and protected mode thorugh and ack too. Windows 9x not only depends the real mode as bootstrap, but also sits itself from and to that mode. Long Mode is a kind of protected mode, not a real mode, but does not belong to the Protected Mode in IA-32, switches itself out of IA-32 dominated Legacy Mode, to a completely self-contained mode, which means even though a x64 processor eliminates its legacy part, it would be fulfunctioned. From the aspect of implementation, or Microarchitecture level, the legacy mode codes could share the same physical execution resources designed for the x64 codes, without needing additional physical execution units for itself, like it found in early Itanium processor. So IA-32 architecture might or might not have relationship with x86-64, x64, AMD64 or Intel64. === IA32e and AMD64 === AMD64 is a switched-out architecture from IA-32, providing compatibility mode to support most IA-32 software and representing itself in the Long Mode within AMD64 processors. It is a new architecture, even though most lying on IA-32 architecture. IA32e is not a mode, but an extention of IA-32, or newer revision of IA-32, introducing 64-bit computing capability for its fundemental architecture. Intel EM64T is the new brought feature to this kind of processors, enabling it for 64-bit computing. Of course, EM64T is not a mode too, but a feature like PAE, could be enabled to extend the 64-bit computing capability. Without EM64T enabled, Yamhill processor would act like a tradtional Pentium 4. After EM64T enabled, 64-bit registers would be visible to applications. 32-bit traditional OS might need minor fixes to support applications referring 64-bit registers to do the 64-bit computings, but programmers must take care of the computing results without intervented by other processes. But most likely as it in PAE, OS might need a patch to support this feature totally, at least to manage the extended descriptors and extended 64-bit registers and stacks and so forth, but without needing to compile the OS from the scratch like it in AMD64. Virtual Address might be extended up to 52 bits, while physical address up to 46 bits. 16K segments of 4GiB could be spreaded to 64TiB physical space, with or without paging. Because the difference between 32bit and 64bit computing is bit width of register rather than the whole system, so 32-bit and 64-bit codes is also differentiated by the referenced resgistered without needing a submode, such as compatibility mode to support tradtional 32-bit software. After EM64T disabled, Yamhill processor would act like a Northwood Pentium 4.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

632,414,510

` == Arbitration case request(Gamergate) declined == An arbitration case request(Gamergate), involving you, has been archived, because the request was declined. The comments made by arbitrators may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee, `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

632,427,967

:Thank you. If you track back beyond Rms125a's cavalier edits to the page you will find that all the revisions I made were scrupulously referenced. It is a pity that Rms125a's actions weren't reversed previously. If I can find the time I'll get back to it.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,443,907

November 2014 (UTC) ::: Do you have any insight into my idea? Would that work / have you ever seen this policy/guideline I seem to be thinking of? - 17:41, 4

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,446,544

`::::Oddexit is right; the source supports ``racial harassment``, not ``workplace harassment``. I would bet that this news article is a better source for this topic, but nihongono wakarimasen (I can't read Japanese) •c) `

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

632,449,252

== Discussion == Hey. I just wanted to say that, in a discussion that I think was overall filled with a lot of silly arguing and unjustified bittnerness, the back and forth we just had at Talk:Worcester was refreshing in its civility and for what I feel was a pretty rational discussion of the points. Thanks for that!

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

632,471,267

Hahaha you thanked me 😅 I know when someone is being deceptive like you mister......... I know I'm 16 but seriously any need.....

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,471,456

Who even are you, and why are you talking to me?

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

632,472,250

I am a registered sex offender and I like to touch myself in public places

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

632,473,793

Ok maybe I was wrong? I'm sorry for what I did mate please don't take what I say seriously at the end of the day I'm only 16 and I have just lost my best friend to a car accident 😔 please forgive me mate 💜

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,476,388

`, 4 November 2014 (UTC) *Moving of copying content to WN and removal from this article are independent and are not mutually exclusive. Hardly anybody writes for WN and even fewer read it. Maybe nom can copy the section, when it was broken down into days' activities, but to remove the content from this article now would be inappropriate and damaging to this article. 22:11`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,487,444

== Introduction of sources that may not be reliable == I recently copyedited the sources for this page and I noticed that this constructive edit introduced a couple of sources that may not be rock solid.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,506,332

== This is more proof of the rampant anti-Semitism on Wikipedia. == Anti-Semites are allowed to censor the truth.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

632,511,436

` ::I agree with Demiurge1000. Stanistani, please lift the ban on the account ``bryansee`` on Wikipediocracy.com. I have no intention of posting what you unilaterally deem as unsuitable material. And you don't aware that the clear signal sent by admins on behalf of BatteryIncluded have a ripple effect throughout the Internet. You don't seem to distinguish the meaning of life and death of people on the Internet. And don't do anything to harm/destroy my computer with input device-disabling malware. Let me make myself clear about Wikipedia: * The administrators and editors alike have turned Wikipedia into an online totalitarian regime, and no one has done a darn thing about it if they don't want to be immediately killed, beaten or received intimidating death threats. BatteryIncluded, Dennis Brown, AGK, and Boing! said Zebedee are said to be a part of them. They tend to use misleading and incivil statements as credible, accurate and correct. They also tend to use personal attacks and outs people as well. This is why they hate them as well. :* This explains cabalism in Wikipedia as well. :* This explains the unevenly enforced, extreme and heavy-handed rules enacted by the Wikipedia community, BatteryIncluded is such a prime example. Others outside Wikipedia really want to worship these rules as well - BatteryIncluded's ally ``forcedmemefred`` is the first one - trying to protect Wikipedia from external harassment. * Wikipedia editors, such as died last April in a rock-climbing accident. Although a loss for Wikipedia, her death might have been deemed by the Wikipedia community as a ``human sacrifice``; BatteryIncluded and his people perceived it as she's ``well``, meaning that she has cured her paranoia. This may apply to me and you as well, as we have signed separate death warrants. I think I have to say that, will not cure paranoia, instead it will be deadly to people. I guess that Wikipedia is not the only one, but also Wikipediocracy (by as Zoloft), Encyclopedia Dramatica and Know Your Meme (via forcedmemefred). :* I think this is the fate that you are going to face later on, especially you are taking actions therein that are aimed at Wikipedia, just as what I've did. :* And, these events have signalled a neo-luddite sentiment against computers and other devices that has the capability to connect to a network given these events, namely computers being the cause of people's paranoia deemed by BatteryIncluded, forcedmemefred and his subordinates. Given the fact Wikipedia is being used to spread malicious code and has the tendency of giving people malware, this is the case for BatteryIncluded as he does to the computers of many users he is dealing with. * BatteryIncluded is really the worst one I've ever seen on the Internet. :* He gives people kittens. ``Kittens`` may be a bomb with a intimidating death therat. The kitten that BatteryIncluded sent me might be a bomb. And is thought by BatteryIncluded to contain kittens. :* He has the reputation of distorting people's histories. :* He has the reputation of sacrificing humans via increase in their medication, as well as making death threats in the guise of ``seeing a doctor/therapist`` advices, as well as inciting neo-luddism against computers. :* He is the source of inspiration of admins and activist alike making personal attacks and acting unilaterally to ban people. * Every page on Wikipedia is outrightly misleading, and ``truth`` is based on whoever edits last. This is why Wikipedia is unreliable in many days, and is a lost cause. So, you still ignore my comments there, do you, Stanistani? `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,511,665

== Problems about Wikipedia == On this on the talk page of , I've outlined the problems Wikipedia is having right now, particularly the one who goes by the name of , the admins, and their unilateral actions based on misleading, unreal, yet credible facts. I think it's the time for you to read it.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,511,976

== Jewelpet == You should probably make a request at WP:AN for a WP:Range block. Make sure to list several of the IPs. , ,

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

632,512,024

` :: You are not telling the truth. If I am going to be sanctioned for telling the verifiable truth, so be it. The RFC/U was unwarranted and was done in complete bad faith. It was biased and there was nothing kind about it. It was a lynch mob and a bad faith pretext to call me all sort of names by a (very) small number of editors on the RFC Talk page and no one was ever sanctioned. You wanted your own ``local`` club and your (very) small consensus playground in the article. You did all you could to push me away. Well, you succeeded, and I have completely stayed away from the article even though I have exceptional knowledge in it, because of you and her. I don't have time for this but I am sure that time, and other editors, will expose all. Have a good night and try to enjoy life and let others enjoy theirs. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,512,203

You both seem to have a pattern of systematically violate policy and then say sorry. This has gotten too old.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

632,512,558

Also, you don't need to scream at be with bold letters. I stopped doing when I realized how it affected other editors. You are still doing it.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

632,513,382

::: Yes, PC123ct1, I remember, and I remember how someone, who I will not include now because he has backed off, wound you and put you against me. In any case, I am out of here. Have a good night the both of you. Enjoy life!...

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

632,521,547

` like this edit that you made today for some self-serving agenda, when the admin expressly stated ``No further edits should be made to this page``.`

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,555,765

` ::::::::So when are we going to have the benefit of your constructive criticism with the continual insults and provocation? Ever? `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,576,569

:::Oh, look, , they also messed with Stoning, just an hour after I removed the full protection. I've removed their tags and semi'd for 3 months. | .

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

632,583,442

` == Memorable Gaffes by country section == An utterly non-encyclopedic section that is really just a coatrack way to list non-notable or non-context events. No sourcing or anything helpful to back up that these are more ``memorable``, if anything it is just what happens to be more recent. If anything, it needs to be trimmed only to gaffes that have their own page. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,584,260

` :Unsurprisingly, trimming it down to only gaffes afforded their own page leaves very few. The article is much better served by discussing the topic and mentioning cases in context as they show up, rather than having a section that is based on what an editor may have an opinion is a particularly ``memorable`` one (especially since there are a few hundred gaffes reported every single month, as far as I can tell). `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

632,596,631

` :*If the point of the house style is that ``an adherence to conventions widely used in the genre are critically important to credibility``, and we are choosing not to follow these conventions widely used in the genre, what is that actual logic? `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

632,599,345

Apparently, Aquaman decided to write a wiki article about a muscle relaxer.

2,014

false

article

random

dev

false

632,601,241

` ::::::Stop trolling Warkosign, no one likes your politician, ``I am the consensus``, ``you mad bro?`` shit. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

true

632,611,719

` == Some baklava for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | You're doing great! |}`

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

632,613,974

:That's a poetic nickname.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

632,615,696

```penis`` and ``faggot`` vandalism, `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

true

632,617,986

*Question Is this the clear primary topic over Chengguan, Chamdo, which is evidently also referred to as Chamdo or Qamdo?

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

632,618,415

*Support Normally we don't just base moves of an official name changing but rather how the common name is used among reliable sources. However, I believe and a search seems to confirm that this has been the commonly used name for a while already, so it's really not an issue. thumbnail

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

632,622,969

:*Pinging or .

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

632,626,015

== Thanks == Thanks for sorting out that blocking error. Looks like you just became an admin, so congrats on that!

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

632,626,228

Regardless, Wikipedia is a construct based entirely off of what sources we consider reliable on the subject say. To move away from that for titling remains illogical and is counterproductive to goals of credibility.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

632,633,462

== Just because you disagree does not mean you can misrepresent == I am removing the material that creates an unbalanced article. Articles are not meant to be opinionated and clearly GoblinFace has an agenda. Please stop undoing my edits. With my edits, the page is more balanced and reflects that some people disagreed with Stevenson.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

632,648,517

I think LuckyLouie and GoblinFace may be the same person. Anyway... This article is not about Reincarnation. It is about Stevenson. Second, these are your opinions of the research and the idea of reincarnation. You don't have the right to impose them on an article about a person.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,648,936

LuckyLouie, you and GoblinFace are the ones who keep undoing my edits. You are engaged in the edit war as much as I am.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

632,649,357

LuckyLouie, to actually reflect the views of the scientific community, as you claim to do, would require a body of scientific research that disproves reincarnation. Stevenson has amassed a huge body of research that suggests it. What actual research is there that disproves it?

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,651,332

== Also used as a Masonic Lodge... == According to the Old Newark website (see here) 810 Broad Street in Newark, New Jersey was also the home of two masonic lodges, Eureka No. 39 and Orient Lodge No. 51 under the supervision of the Grand Lodge of New Jersey F. & A. M. My question is can the Old Newark website be considered a proper reference to use on Wikipedia for this information? I would appreciate if someone could give clarification. Thank you.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,652,933

` :::None of you is addressing my reason for trying to balance the text. Furthermore, I did not start the process of undoing edits. I am merely trying to create a BALANCED article. The fact that it is well-sourced is irrelevant if the material is just cherry-picked to discredit Stevenson. The material I deleted is there because of your so-called ``debunking`` agenda. You clearly have an axe to grind on Stevenson and are unwilling to listen. Instead of admitting your bias, you hide behind Wikipedia norms of consensus, and condescending lecturing. Instead of actually engaging in a discussion about the content we are disagreeing over, you want to simply keep ignoring my arguments. Admit that you have an ideological agenda and please go grind your axe somewhere else. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

true

632,655,829

Ah...due process. Blocked without anyone actually looking carefully at what is going on. First I am blocked by repeated undos of my edits, then the lovely skeptics complain (I can't call them tr***s). And does anyone see an effort on their part to address my concerns? Not so far. Just condescending lectures about policy. Oh, and blocking prevents me from discussing anything except here, so that's helpful.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

632,663,452

REDIRECT Talk:Nothing But Love (disambiguation)

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,663,758

::And now I've located confirmation of the act of the 3rd session of the 1st Congress on the date in question. http://docsouth.unc.edu/imls/22conf/1863stat.html#p167 So the Semmes account must have the wrong year.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,675,449

::::::::Their opinions may not be facts (obviously), but the fact that these (relevant) people have claimed such-and-such is a fact. As such we can report it.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

632,678,257

== citations == Hello, thanks for your edit here. I noticed you didn't use , which is considered standard. This app can help you speed up the process. Happy editing,

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

632,681,239

== get lost pinethicket == mind you own business and stop changing my edits I can edit whatever and whenever I want you don't like it say it to my face

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,681,774

== who asked you fourviolas == pinethicket has had some disagreement with my edits its between him and me so keep your big nose out of my business you Christian scum

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

632,696,961

` (UTC) I've also noticed this conflicting information. Both skinks AND geckos can't both be the most diverse. I'm changing this to ``one of`` for now since it seems to be in accurate. 14:50, 6 November 2014`

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

632,705,752

::*Apology accepted, ! Mistakes happen, and in the scheme of things this one was sorted out pretty quickly, so don't feel too bad. Thanks for the apology though! Cheers,

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,723,800

` *Oppose - The current title is overwhelmingly preferred by the policy of using the most common name, and the manual of style specifically encourages editor discretion. The MOS is great for our writing style and when the official or common name might be unknown, but to argue that it should be used to take an official name with a specifically chosen title that is used by the absolutely overwhelming majority of reliable sources, including books, newspapers, and websites, as well as is the generally common name is fairly absurd. Our title guidelines and policies are unfortunately somewhat murky. But, what it comes down to can be gleaned from Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), which states that ``an adherence to conventions widely used in the genre are critically important to credibility``. If Billboard is using a style, and Rolling Stone or the New York Times or Spin or just the bulk of reliable sourcing in general largely use the official title, is it really common sense for us to be saying we shouldn't be following the sources here in order to somehow adhere to conventions and gain credibility? Wikipedia is a unique construct in that our work is so clearly tied and based off of reliable sourcing about the subject making us stand out and go against the grain here just doesn't make much sense.There's also just the general notion (which certainly should not be the deciding factor in finding consensus) that certain lowercase words just look weird in titles. Perhaps this may give some indication as to why ``like`` and other 3 or more letter words are very often capitalized in composition titles but words like ``a``, ``to``, or ``and`` often aren't. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,724,193

:*Two points - 1) You normally don't need to give a !vote on a requested move that you've nominated. I don't think it's expressly forbidden or anything, but especially when it's not the first comment it gives an impression that more people are involved in the discussion than there actually are. 2) I believe you've misread my comment expressing support.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

632,726,392

-actually Mike I have no affiliation with them except for the fact they are my main store I use for all my fly and info. They are the largest fly catalog and inventory of a store anywhere. Wikipedia is totally devoid of a bunch of important companies....if youll notice i was trying to start pages for scott lamson sage(farbanks) tibor ect. The problem with the industry is a bunch of people not knowing anything about the options and the few people who do like to browbeat people who dont know info but dont make it available to them. So no I am not spamming fly stop. They just happen to be where I started because they are closest my list went flystop, hatch, abel reels, farbanks lamson scott....as I was going geographically from me.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

632,733,513

:*I'm sort of confused by what you're saying. Sure, you improved the disambiguation page, and that's a good thing. But it's not like its state before you made these changes was particularly messy, or screaming out that it needed to be changed to be functional. There's a billion and one different things that need improvement in Wikipedia, but that doesn't mean that all other changes must be held off until those happen.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,736,608

` == Propose a title change == The term ``silent intifada`` seems to be mostly coming from the pro-occupation media and the articles discussing this ``silent intifada`` seem to leave out mention of Israeli attacks, mobs, in Jerusalem. Not only is the current title partisan it is also not the most popular description for the subject. I feel, and google tells me, that simply ``Jerusalem unrest`` is the most popular, and neutral, description for the current events. So I propose that someone moves the article to ``Jerusalem unrest``. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,737,377

:*Then you should probably go to October 2014 Jerusalem vehicular attack and ask for the page to be moved to October 2014 Jerusalem car accident as the driver's mother disputes that there was an attack.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

632,738,049

` ==Chace Community School== You need to cite sources for this. What is ``Lads``? Most English speakers would not know. For lists of people, they need to have their own page with few exceptions. See WP:LISTPEOPLE, WP:WTAF. Also, your link to Thomas Carroll is a Help:Disambiguation page, not a person. Make sure that the article you link to does state that he went to Chace, or add a citation. Thank you `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

632,742,498

` There is a Request for Comment about ``Chronological Summaries of the Olympics`` and you're invited! `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

632,752,092

== Some Third-party opinions == I've been asked to provide a third opinion on recent disputes. Here goes: #Do you understand why File:Grand Kudu, Eritrea.jpg was deleted, Vetrisimino0? I'd like to hear that you do; you should after a read of . It seems the deletion was appropriate. (And, it's reversible with permission logged via an [[Commons:OTRS| OTRS ticket].) #As for the suggestion to From just reading this page, it looked like this had been settled, and the photos are to be left in and photos of members of other groups can be added over time (and there have been multiple other editors providing opinions already). Good. I would add that images should be shrunk or (better yet) merged, as at [:File:Eriamercol.jpg], so that this can happen. However, I see File:Traditional_Eritrean_dance.jpg has replaced Tigrinya Eritrean wedding picture File:Eritrea_Eritrean_wedding.jpg. Is this a problem? I don't know the ethnicities of the photographed parties. I haven't looked through the article's edit history and don't plan do. #*Flickr has lots more appropriately licensed files. I see File:Rashaida_family.png is on the french article, so there are photos available. #Re. Faytinga photo: I think it should stay. Re. The mayote site seems to be a mouthpiece for a particular set of politicial views, so I don't think it's a reliable source for much other than its own views. (My opinion would be swayed if it had a written fact-checking policy.) However, given 3 other sources Vetrisimino0 says confirm Faytinga's mother's ethnicity, it seems reasonable to belive it's true. Can you accept that, Middayexpress? If not, I still think her picture merits inclusion (without noting her mother's ethnicity) and 'clutter' is a poor argument for its removal here. #I do wish to point out that a blanket order to a fellow editor like is highly inappropriate and invalid here! The WP:BOLD guideline applies to, and allows, such edits. However, so does the part of BOLD that guides one as to how to react when one's bold edits are not left in place. So, in other words, both of you should read / review WP:BOLD. (I see no argument for an exception to BOLD.) So, hopefully both sides will accept my opinions, and move on to edit on other topics within and without Eritrea. There are points where I have agreed with each of you and points where I have disagreed with each of you (two each), and I believe I've been able to be fair and impartial. Hope that helps.•c)

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,752,711

PS As for the coffee... Both photos are technically about equally poor, but good enough for use in an article. File:Coffee_ceremony.jpg is superior, subject-wise. so it should stay in. •c)

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,758,098

:::*Then considering that no independent expert, no one without an interest in not being responsible for having blown up children, you agree it is ridiculous for us to place the killers denial on par with those experts who pulled pieces of Israel bombs out of the victims.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

632,758,629

** But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you block him before it's too late?

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

632,759,369

and revert his edits

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

632,759,909

But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you just block him and revert his edits before it's too late?

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

632,760,504

:@: But just won't stop destroying several entertainment company articles. All he does is remove useful/accurate information, erasing owner/parent company lists in infoboxes, butchering the formatting, and renaming sections to used company names, so HE'S the one who's a vandal. Why don't you just block him and revert his edits before it's too late?

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,761,575

(which could have been lost forveer)

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,771,243

`==NPOV== The sentence gives the false impression that reasonable minds consider it an acceptable practice. The idea that quote stuffing is ever acceptable is one that departs significantly from the prevailing or mainstream view. As WP:PROFRINGE notes, ``if the only statements about a fringe theory come from the inventors or promoters of that theory, then various ``What Wikipedia is not`` rules come into play.`` Also we have blogs used as sources in the HFT voices section, but nothing from or even mentioning Nanex / Eric Scott Hunsader e.g. http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4670.html (and http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4594.html)? •c) `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,776,723

== MAYBE YOU SHOULD READ OVER YOUR MESSAGES == It's blatantly easy to see your big head is getting in the way of others hard work. Wikipedia needs less of your bigot 'intuition'. Many people are upset with your work, pull your thick fucking skull in before someone else does it for you.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

632,777,359

== Hi Jim1138 == Before you move your mouse over the delete button, have a think about this you arrogant neckbeard freak. Take in what others have said about you. They are not happy with your deletions of their righteous work. How about I go through your edits and revert them back to their previous forms, stating that you need viable evidence to back them up? Or, how about this one; KEEP YOUR DECISIONS UNIFORM. It is that hard?

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,777,639

== ON A SIDE NOTE == Stop being a little cry-baby and grow up. Stop complaining to your administrators behind their computers. I'm sure you're a grown man. Grow up and act like one.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,783,136

`*Hendrix British singles chronology ``Fire`` (1982) **This doesn't make any sense. The article on that song, ``Fire (The Jimi Hendrix Experience song)``, lists the release as 1969. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,789,757

===Closing comment=== Reviewer Squeamish Ossifrage hasn't edited on Wikipedia since October 2. As this review has been abandoned, the nomination is being returned to the reviewing pool, where it will hopefully get some attention.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

632,791,168

Where is box of frogs on the discography?

2,014

false

article

random

test

false

632,806,542

:, I don't believe there's any prohibition on it. It does seem to be a fairly common occurrence and normally no issue is raised about it. If you can point to a policy or guideline that says otherwise, of course, that would be different.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

632,807,229

:::It's neither common practice nor accepted practice to discount the opinions of IP editors.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

632,810,217

Cut-and-paste move on Kravica massacre

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

632,837,897

OK, now I understand. http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-01/wikipedia-getting-worse-it-gets-better

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

632,838,975

== Update == Hi. Could you update this information to Longevity claims page. Manuel Carrasco Rodríguez from Panama has passed away 27 August 2014 . I also found an article a man who was born in Swaziland but died in South Africa. Sant Pikinini Malunga-Maseko (16 July 1894 - 13 April 2012) .

2,014

false

user

random

train

false

632,841,223

== If you look at my edits... == ...you will notice they are helpful.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

632,841,884

== Die == I HATE YOU PRICK YOU DINT DESERVE A PLACE HERE

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

632,843,834

`:::Oh, I know all about that - I used to have access when I worked at Salford Uni. If my employers had known how much time I spent on there they wouldn't have been too happy. `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

632,847,130

== Proposed Section Change == The Concept section seems to me to be misnamed. It doesn't really explain the 'concept' it seems to really explain more the criticisms of FM methods. I propose that we 1 - create a section called Criticism or Treatments and move the bullet points there and 2 - Make the Concept section about the actual concept of FM

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

632,849,439

== I used the file 1968_AMC_Rebel_Station_Wagon-GoldWhite.jpg for another wiki == Hey, I used one of your photos for my wikia about an own video game. I credited you of course, just leave a message there if you don't want me to use it. ) http://gta-lost-episode.wikia.com/wiki/Basher_XL

2,014

false

user

random

train

false

632,867,527

== Before the Play == An editor has been reinserting unsourced information that was challenged in part because of its lack of sourcing. Please keep in mind that WP:BURDEN stipulates that material that was removed due to sourcing concerns should not be reinserted without any referencing. BURDEN trumps WP:PRESERVE. I would also remind editors of WP:BRD - the matter should now be discussed here before additional changes are made. Thank you.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,868,708

== Flag == The kingdom of Sicily did not possess a Flag; It possessed numerous CoA's and Flags according to its respective rules; Because of the factual correctness: Flag deleted from info box

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

632,874,427

::Due to recent edit warring of photo back into article, I raised the issue at the BLP noticeboard for additional opinions.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

632,878,579

:No, because there are no RS attesting to the validity of data correlating brain size to race. While many sources may opine that significance exists per various data sets, none are reliable...that is, since no editorial board of any peer-reviewed science journal has yet taken such sources seriously enough to publish or engage them in published dialogue, neither should Wiki.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false