rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
633,527,652
|
== November 2014 == Stop vandalising articles you utter nob.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
633,536,786
|
` ===Civility=== I don't think you deserve any civility, and your talk page/edit history goes a long way in showing that. You appear to be one of the worst kinds of Israelis/pro-Israel people you're even pro ``settler``. So no, I'm not going to worry about ``not treating you with civility``. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,548,129
|
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prashantpking. Thank you.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,550,768
|
== Youre an asshole == youre an asshole
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
633,554,510
|
== Wrong formules == and are wrong, first of all, one is -arcsin and the other is +arcsin? in adittion I have tried to use it and I am getting numbers like 0.0003º when was expected around -17º.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,559,587
|
::There have been two blocks which you, John, imposed, and almost straight away rescinded. -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
633,563,118
|
== Hey faggot == You keep reverting my changes to pages. I don't like it. I'm adding legit info. Check yourself asshole.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
633,563,555
|
== Hey faggot. Seriously?! == I add legit info to pages, and you revert it. You tell me to come talk on your talk page, and you remove it. The fuck kid? You shitting me right now?
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
633,563,738
|
== Asshole... == You serious right now cunt?
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
633,570,257
|
::Indeed, and I was very very careful not to make personal attacks or to harass anybody. -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,571,519
|
::::Thank you for clarifying the reason for my block. -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,572,506
|
` :Thank you , that was very random, unexpected and kind of you. All the best to you, `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,580,057
|
:::::Further note to potential reviewing admin If we have interacted in the past, thank you for your interest, but allow an uninvolved admin to review this. I will of course accept any further review. -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,586,908
|
::: I didn't start the account for WP:COI reasons. On occasion I look up info on Wikipedia and felt I could contribute in my expertise areas. I ran across companies here making outrageous claims and attempting to promote themselves. Regardless of my comments, the cat's out of the bag - why do such promotions exist here? How would you act if someone else brought it to your attention?
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,608,035
|
Tomić is a very obscure figure in many ways, and very little is known about him. Due to this, I thought the article would be a stub or reach start-class at most. However, I was lucky enough to find a series of Serbian news articles written to commemorate the centenary of WWI, which conveniently mention his activities during the war but little else. What's there is there. His obituary mentions where his funeral service would be held and that he was survived by his sister in Yugoslavia. Should I include this info?
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,617,333
|
U r a sorry excuse for a human being. Sleep well, atleast as long as God will permit your utter screw up of a wasted soul to have rest. P.S. get off the Internet, your worthless time spent here won't make your dad love you, you are the reason they got divorced.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
633,619,697
|
== Reply == Naghma is well known in the Pashtun world, not only in Afghanistan but Pakistan as well since her husband is pakistani. Janghair khan is not well known among pashtuns my friend. Salman Khan and Sharukh khan may have pashtun ancestry but that is only partial and their mothers were indian, therefore they cannot be put into that list since this is about Pashtuns who have parents that are both pashtun.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,621,180
|
Sorry about my mean message. I just have so much contempt for smarmy people that insist on spreading their crap views as facts. You should stick to your blog, of course no one reads it but it may make u feel better and its a lot cheaper than your therapist that Obamacare no longer covers.. I wish u well and I hope u find what you're looking for soon.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,633,965
|
:::I am unable to thank you for your review using the normal method PhilKnight, as I believe my block prevents those links appearing. As it is very early in the morning here, and I haven't yet had my necessary amount of tea to enable proper cognitive function to set in, I will take your sage advice under advisement, and merely strike my appeal comments. -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,640,086
|
Okay then. Well, regarding the usage of IndiaGlitz, i sincerely tried to find alternative source and i got a very very less support from Sify, Rediff and Oneindia. Behindwoods was zero. Deccan Chronicle was almost useless. And forget TOI and The Hindu. At least something related to VFX was available from the latter. And info from Idlebrain was more of film making information published post release. Thus, with no other options available, i had to opt for IndiaGlitz. So, mostly i may not remove them for the time being. But if i find something reliable than it, at least relating to one fact, i will surely replace it.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
633,666,754
|
:I have decided to withdraw my request for unblock - I shall spend the time of the rest of this block cleaning my paws of the taint of the ayurvedic fields I have recently been walking in. I shall respond to the other comments of support, and the unintelligible one, at a more suitable time, after the block is over.-
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,667,176
|
Hi What did you learn at the Wikipedia workshop today?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,675,204
|
== Sorry for my misbehaviour == Respected Samarojit Sir, I really apologize you for the misbehavior. I just wanted you to ask you that if we can add exact height of Actor Arjun Kapoor and other actors from the google knowledge graph.https://www.google.com/#q=arjun+kapoor here is the link which can help you to identify that the height information should be written or not. The height information if is incorrect then I want you to contact google to delete height information because most of the actor's google knowledge graph has first half of information is connected with Wikipedia that's way I am confused please reply me back. From:
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,687,628
|
` :::Think of it like this...MesoAmerica and SA are big areas. The ``less certain`` part means narrowing down to a smaller area. I see two options a) cut ``The exact location of origin of C. ficifolia and C. moschata is less certain`` entirly or b) make is something like ``The precise location of origin of C. ficifolia and C. moschata within those areas is less certain``. I lean towards cutting it entirely. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,691,120
|
It was here in the US though.. I don't understand why there are all these issues with pics here on wikipedia, they don't care on other sites.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,695,308
|
` == My apologies == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | My apologies |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | My apologies for not providing a source, it is just that I thought it would seem obvious that the band considered themselves active while making The Endless River. Please accept my apologies. |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,708,799
|
== Leave now == Leave NOw
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,715,447
|
, 13 November 2014 (UTC) :::::It was explained very clearly by (Dominus Vobisdu) in the comment directly below this one, and in further comments to this section. Read it, and stop being disruptive please. Thanks. - 20:52
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,737,899
|
November 2014 (UTC) :::::::::Hi Blades, nice to see you around the place, how are you feeling following all the drama recently. I do hope your recent block by John didn't upset you as much as mine did me! May I politely and respectfully remind you that you have no consensus to use these medical terms, despite your polite comment above. Thanks very much, Respect - 00:02, 14
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
633,740,466
|
` == Description of comets and hydrostatic equilibrium == {| style=``border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align:top;`` | |rowspan=``2`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;`` | The E=mc² Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;`` | alt |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
633,742,264
|
== Do you know who I am? == Z
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,742,512
|
== Don't vandalize == again.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
633,743,498
|
Actually it does, nobody in the world would see salman khan or sbarukh khan has pashutn let alone janghair khan. You only add pashtuns from pakistan who are mostly athletes or singers but leave out actual important people. I will remove your edit since its agains't the rules to edit somebody else's work over it. Good day.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,743,675
|
and don't remove my edits from other pages you paki, or will report you!
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,752,052
|
:Since I just saw your note about having limited Internet access for the time being, I'll also bring this up at some other clerk's talk page. — (no relation to Jimbo)
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,764,608
|
'Haitian Creole' section was edited and extended as well.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,815,479
|
` to Maghasito. Yours: In 1851 ... The majority of the Jews were centred in Jerusalem. The Jews enjoyed official protection of the Sultanate, and their community prospered. However, according to Nathan Weinstock, the British consul of Jerusalem wrote at 1831 the Jews are suffering so much from extortion and oppression, that people say that the Jews pays for the air they breath. (excuse me for the translation). source http://www.haaretz.co.il/magazine/.premium-1.2315763 (Hebrew. more about the authour: book: Une si longue présence , Comment le monde arabe a perdu ses Juifs, 1947-1967, by Nathan Weinstock ; a Book review (English): `` Une si longue présence , Comment le monde arabe a perdu ses Juifs, 1947-1967`` 2008, by Nathan Weinstock. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,817,418
|
: Stop deleting my edits
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,820,745
|
:: you have not provided a source for the material you want added. •
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
633,821,475
|
`48, 14 November 2014 (UTC) == RfC: porcino vs porcini == Should the text of this article employ ``porcini``, the plural of ``porcino``, as a singular term? 15:`
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
633,825,317
|
But WNAC old one goes to the WHDH page
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,837,181
|
` == Suggestion re ``Notation`` == It now reads ``In either algebraic or descriptive chess notation, en passant captures are sometimes denoted by ``e.p.`` or similar, but such notation is not required. In algebraic notation, the move is written as if the captured pawn advanced only one square, for example, bxa3 (or bxa3e.p.) in this example.`` I'd suggest adding a word so that it reads ``... the capturing move is written as if ... .`` I wouldn't want the reader to get the idea that the half-move that made the capture possible is recorded as a one-step pawn advance, e.g. that ``a4`` gets retroactively recorded as ``a3`` if an e.p. capture immediately follows. I found the passage ambiguous upon first reading. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,842,850
|
` :If you have a reliable source that talks explicitly about ``blowback`` using that word regarding the actions of OBL or after the killing of OBL, then it would be relevant. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
633,853,183
|
== What edit war? == I'm not involved in any edit war at all. Please don't make false claims against other editors. -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
633,853,880
|
:Hi , Lovely to see you here for the first time since the 19th of October. I am concerned that in your polite comment above, you seem to politely imply that I have in some way misbehaved, gaming the system, when I added the ARBCOM pseudoscience/fringe tag to this page. Surely this is not true, as you agree that the placement of the tag is merited. Surely anybody is entitled to place such a tag. Please could you clarify, and I would politely suggest withdraw, what could be construed by some as a personal attack. Thanks. -
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,856,752
|
But the name is a Vivendi Comcast mager
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,860,760
|
` Hi, thanks for discussing. Please note that there's nothing derogatory about the term protectorate, on the contrary. But most importantly, it's not just ``a review of a book``. Reputable sources that call Bosnia and Herzegovina a protectorate are many indeed, are scientific, and highly reputable. Many were used years ago when settling the international community's extra-judicial dictate. I don't think we must re-discuss the already settled issues in each article's Talk over and over again. Nonetheless, I can stack up dozens of such references each time I state the government type. That's really not a problem since there are plenty of such sources as I said, however it would make articles look kinda ugly? `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
633,868,773
|
its just a company magering
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
633,876,405
|
::I said there are numerous references stating BH regime type as protectorate, many of which can be found in another discussion linked above.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
633,881,122
|
== False accusations == I have been accused of sock puppeting, yet they still havnt brought one single piece of tangible proof, even though the other person claimed he was from mexico, which I am from the states. The main reason why I was initially blocked was because of Bigcat82, as his false accusations, bias moderating, lies, misinformation and more lies...7 different people have noted he was bias, and still he is allowed to control the lion vs tiger section with only repeating its not reliable or not a peer journal, none of this is true, for instance, his account where he put on lion vs tiger has been sitting there for going on 6 years and still no one has even peered into it, it is a straight up lie that he said the lion was killed, here is the full article of the 1909 fight: [url]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NuqIbte0hB8/T8DE0k29m2I/AAAAAAAAyuI/uNemgrJ-vfI/s1600/Anotherfightatbostocks.jpg[/url] Miss informs people, and twists facts, he uses this tactics on the roman accounts, leaving out who won in popmeii and following it in with a non credible source William bridges is not a historian, but he uses it to capitalize on the archaeology book, in fact that book roots to the fact the lion defeated the tiger, as roman/italian sites says the tiger is being attacked by a lion: [url]http://www.romanoimpero.com/2010/01/pompei.html[/url] He routes it to the usual that it was a leopard, but the leopard mosaic is in the house of doves, the lion standing over a prostrated tiger is in the house of faun. Several members point out his major flaws such as Bbbeto, as he states its not that the sources arnt reliable he just doesnt want anything that favors the lion and will show the lion as the usual winner, its not that they arent peer jorunals, its that the support the lion, he has erased over 20 things not seeable now on the talk page and edit page, it doesnt matter if its from a trainer, if they support the lion he will call it unreliable and the rules dont apply...what rules? Its only his rules, there hasnt been a consensus done by 10 people at once going on over 6 years? Is this what wiki is for, for who ever is the more persistent and the better liar to be able to control wiki? Its just his ) and he should be banned from editing that topic, since he is already a part of over 20 forums specifically on topic where he has been caught lying, for instance he just said he has graduated from 10 university's... [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BigCat82[/url] Really he graduated from 10 of the top university around the world? Show us just one of them, name the university, show us who you studied under, show us a copy of your diploma, he is a pathological liar, look under the bear contributions countless of people call him specifically a tiger fan, look at the talk page there, the lion vs tiger contribution, only he is ever erasing things of favoring the lion, Wikipedia mods should be ashamed for having a person use its search engine for a person pumping out his own propaganda and bias POV for this amount of time unchecked. He now says that no experts favor a lion, really? Define expert, if we look at what wiki has as expert: [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert[/url] We can see that an expert is someone who has pro-longed experience or observation, the topic is about them fighting, so they have to have excerpts and citations of them seeing a fight...no excerpts of them exist for the tiger so far, yet he disputes people who does, and is considered experts. -Clyde beatty -Terrel jaccobs -Bert nelson -Peter taylor -Dave hoover -Damoo dhotre -Marco Peters -Isablela thomas -William blackburne -George conklin -Dave salmoni -Samatha stephens -Dr antle from big cat rescue -Dr Frank mendel There are alot of experts who favor the lion, yet he will just lie and lie and lie that they dont, just like the accounts, there are 50 tigers killed by lions just from Clyde beatty alone: [url]http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/139517086?searchTerm=clyde%20beatty%2050%20tigers%20killed&searchLimits;=[/url] Lions have killed tigers hundreds of times, theres even photo evidence of the combatants: [url]http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/83094750?searchTerm=tiger%20pries%20and%20dies%20lion&searchLimits;=[/url] [url]http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/135423123?searchTerm=lion%20tiger%20fight%20turin&searchLimits;=[/url] Yet the only one he accepts is the one to make like the lion is incapable of killing a tiger by highlighting they were small, female, ambushed ect...giving the appeal that lions dont stand a chance, when in fact they are taller at the shoulder, heavier as a species, has more genuine experts who favor the lion over the tiger upon experience, has killed more times then vice versa. The article doesnt have to show a one sided one but a fair assessment should be brought in by atleast 10 peer reviewers, of people who actually read the actual dam article instead of leaving lies, and misinformation by the biggest bias liar on the web. In fact i just left crumbs there, I am not gona participate in aiding this topic on this search engine again, you guys can manipulate the system and misinform people all you like, I will take this info to a proper site where people like Bigcat82 and flatout aka false accusers and liars cant do anything about changing the truth.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
633,882,603
|
::Did you really need to violate the WP:be_civil too?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,884,086
|
::Why would anyone trust someone's use of prejudice to allegedly fight another prejudice? Do you realize how ridiculous that is?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,885,443
|
` ::According to your profile, you are fluent in Dutch. So let me ask you: are you Dutch? For if you are, you should not be involved with Bosnia articles, for obvious historical reasons such as Srebrenica massacre (by the same token of prejudice you use on that noticeboard for grouping all the ``Balkans people`` based on some Macedonia issue). Clearly, I'm asking so that I can report you for abuse of administrative privileges, again based on the same type of argument you use when arbitrarily relating Macedonia to Bosnia to Dalmatia to Kosovo to... the ``Balkans``. Your nationality, please? `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
633,887,560
|
. And Kuru, you are wrong, if we go by whats in place, then I am only blocked because it states right here because of using multiple accounts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Golden_Prime Again I challange anyone and everyone here to provide proof that I have multiple accounts, I can I assure you I dont, thats not my style
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,888,079
|
The entire page is a violation of NPOV. It is bought, paid for and monitored for the purposes of promoting the subject material.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,890,508
|
::::Sorry you didn't get it that resorting to pseudo-arguments works both ways. Sure Drmies can ban me, but I'm still reporting him for violation of administrator privileges.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,891,371
|
:The reason for modifying is simple: abuse of administrator privileges by Drmies for closing in record-breaking time in order to prevent other users to voice their opinion, such as Sabahudin9 who clearly support me and was also reverting the reported user's edits. Is there anybody here on Wikipedia who actually cares about what's right and what's wrong, what the rules are, and how they are (not) implemented?!
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
633,892,671
|
::What prejudices? I was making an example of his prejudice by making him face one himself. Or you didn't get it? How did you become an administrator on Wikipedia if you're unable to grasp such simple meanings even?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
633,901,652
|
own guideline rules, you have me as a puppeteer, PROVE IT THEN! Other wise remove my block
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,902,010
|
, I did no such thing, I also have seen people harass others 10x more than I did and are still not indefinitely blocked, what kinda propaganda is this?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,928,220
|
` : Thanks for you message, I'll take care of it tonight as I'm just about to leave the house. ) `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
633,938,208
|
== Info == You are a cunt. I make this open war now, and will seek to make your ife on here as upleasant as possible
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
633,965,880
|
== F**K ALL RIDES AT WORLDS OF FUN == I hate all rides at Worlds of Fun because they are sh_tty and boring. All ride operators at WOF should be fired sued and hanged. Burn all WOF coasters. Arrest all WOF park operators! Assassinate all WOF customers! I heard that a boy died on Timberwolf on August, 2014. That's stupid! Worlds of Fun should have nown better to built that sh_t ride. Worlds Of Fun cares about money and prophet moar than they're customers. Burn that sh_t park down! F**K YOU RIDES! WorldS Of Fun is dangerouser than GRround Zero and Area 51. Worlds of Fun should burn in Hell!
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
633,977,415
|
:::(Haha Somebody tell John, 4 weeks is about his average response time based on this page. For clarity, this comment was a joke, not a personal attack) ::: Just a suggestion, but I feel that it may be worth just lifting the failed sanctions imposed by John, leaving the well established and well tried Arbcom sanctions in place. This has the advantage of lifting the present chilling effects on mainstream editors. All those experienced fringe editors who have left this page are well used to working with them, and the results have been good for the project. SPAs, IP editors with vested interests, COI eds and fringe theory advocates have all been successfully prevented from disrupting the project on very controversial pages simply by using said sanctions. Please consider this, bearing in mind that Arbcom sanctions were not explicitly imposed on this page when John's Ad Hoc sanctions were imposed. Thanks. -
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,980,486
|
REDIRECT Talk:Sky (United Kingdom)
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
633,980,491
|
::::::Oh no. My Fluoxetine are yellow and green. Uppers and downers all in one ! What shud I do? -
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
633,998,293
|
` :``pro-Japanese editors who openly and honestly admit their bias.`` I beg your pardon? Are you perhaps aware of [WP:NPOV]]? Let me quote it for you now: ::``All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.`` ::I myself am not editing from a position of bias, not least because this is exactly the wrong attitude to approach wikipedia with. You will pardon me if I find that I am unimpressed by your threat of ``constant and increasing editing pressure from pro-Japanese editors.`` Having said all this, the controversies I think are best summed up by the first sentence of the lead, that is to say, ``Controversies surrounding Yasukuni Shrine are a major international issues surrounding the Yasukuni Shrine, which is a Japanese Shinto shrine.`` The controversies reflect criticism of the actions of prominent Japanese politicians in visiting a controversial and politically-charged location. The gap between criticism and actual bigoted sentiment is fairly great. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
634,009,414
|
:When I think you can't surprise me... Here you come again. It's hilarious. Now inviting people to create a consensus about something you changed all by yourself is wrong? I'd do it anyway regardless of who was involved. Get over it.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
634,036,189
|
` :::::She toured in an Andrew Lloyd Webber production in 2011 and starred in a film in 2012; what's not notable about that? More recently, she's been focusing on her education, so she hasn't been doing anything in the entertainment world, but she did not fall off the face of the earth after BGT. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
634,037,304
|
` :. This is a British topic; see MOS:PLURALS regarding British use of collective nouns. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,104,532
|
== Your request at WP:FFU ==
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
634,111,783
|
== Sources and masters used == So I removed the personnel section existent in the article until recently and did my best to accommodate whatever it says in (supposedly) reliable sources. Aren't there any better authorities on who plays what? The AFM sheets and Badman's book are of course not known for their infallibility. And how do we know for sure which recordings from which dates were used on the final mix? I tried consulting The Smile Sessions box for an idea but some segments sound so much alike that it's hard to tell. Isn't Craig Slowinski going to publish something soon that clarifies these issues?
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
634,114,740
|
REDIRECT Talk:2010–11 Leeds United F.C. season
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,146,375
|
== 2014 sterilisation deaths in India == Hey good edits and content addition. Just a heads up to use Indin English in the article ;)
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,186,216
|
== fuck off == fuck off
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
634,186,308
|
fuck off, jack
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
634,186,618
|
== fuck off == fuck off muazim balwin
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
634,188,444
|
== hello == u sir are a gentleman and a scholar
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
634,195,559
|
:Thank you , I have see it, Cheer up ^_^
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
634,199,866
|
:::::You're again reminded not to personal attack on other editors with diffident views. Do you have sources that support the claim after the event? If not then the speculation is unproven.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,208,669
|
```Pancreatic cancer`` will certainly get by far the most traffic (little comes through the PA redirect page). `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
634,214,720
|
==Earth?== Hey , I see that you're from Planet Earth. I'm also from Planet Earth! I have been working on the Wikipedia article about Planet Earth from Planet Earth. Would you like to give me a hand?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,215,312
|
toolLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINES
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,215,470
|
easterLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINES
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,215,524
|
MarxismLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINES
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,215,701
|
LONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINESLONG LIVE ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINES
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
634,282,094
|
` == The American Agenda to Homosexualize the World == Why does this article make him sound like a bad person for condemning behaviors/traits that are obviously wrong and misplaced?? I was reading all his quotations and views in the article (which are in line with biblical teachings) and I realized that the conclusion given always made him look like a confused fellow. What is WRONG is WRONG!!!! Homosexuality has been WRONG, is still WRONG and will forever-ly remain WRONG till the end of time and nothing can change that as long as this earth remains. No matter how Americans (and that Pope dude) try to stylishly impose homosexuality on the world, there will be few people of dignity like Bishop RL. Burke, who will always stand for the truth. Don't tell me that Wikipedia is not the right place to discuss the morality in homosexuality, because I already knew that before coming here. At this point, I expect the Pro-gay activists to delete my post giving reasons like: ``it does not contribute anything to this article``. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
634,289,083
|
November 2014 (UTC) :Answer improved - 22h,40, 17
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
634,303,510
|
: I did this late at night and wasn't able to add much information to the page. If I was to add much more information to it (I had very little content previously) could you please consider allowing my edit to pass?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,305,480
|
:::Yes, of course, I intend to finish the article at some point. Right now, I think I'll go back to the GA-expansion of Hitler's adjutants. I think that's closer to the criteria and will be relatively easier. I trust you will do some ce's if you see the need for it. And cheers for all the help on 1940 FMC.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,319,097
|
` == Hope == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Best of luck! |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I do hope that you will try to follow the guidelines more properly and become an asset to the community, and that your t-ban be lifted one day. Best of luck! ✉ mail |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,324,354
|
Dare send messages like this. You are the cause of Vandalism not me,...&*%$4@###banged up head
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
634,325,725
|
:OK, no one's edited this talk page in 5.5 years, so I'm just going to change it. •
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,345,319
|
REDIRECT Talk:Ian Hamilton (footballer, born 1967)
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
634,364,454
|
` Hello Mr.feedhigh there are few things i want to make you clear 1) why I wrote descended from ``old royal families in Nepal`` not just Mallas is because i have some tangible evidence for this `` I myself is a newar and I think you know for a fact that most newars has an old god or a place dedicated to worship the old gods called `` Kul devta / kul devta mandir``. Our temple is located in Balkumari hill (near Balkumari mandir in Patan) according to the ``purohit `` of the temple who also happens to be our ``purohit`` (Sorry I can't find a good translation for this word ``purohit`` in english) has a recorded document (I can provide the document if you like to examine it, also give you the contact address of the purohit himself, whos living near Mangal Bazzar even today) states that the ``kul devta`` temple was erected at the time of Bhaskar verma by his second son Diwakar verma as a tribute to the god called ``Bhairav`` and thats how were descended and still worship the same place and temple even till this day. Also according to the same purohit we adopted ``Shrestha`` (changed from Verma) in the time of jayasthitti Malla (the reasons purohit told my there was a lot of instability in Patan and family feuds happening , but am not sure the exact reasons. If you want details, like I said I can give you the contact of the ``purohit`` who gave me this information you can also go to him to examine the document. Hence, this is the reason I wrote descended from old royal families in Nepal. 2) Second you removed [during shah dynasty] yes it seems ironic serving the same people who later happen took our whole race out of power but there is a lot of history here too and history has to be written as it happened . What can i say is that you have to accept defeat sometimes , but it doesn't mean we will always be defeated , or accept that defeat for all eternity ( All I want to say is .This 2006 revolt where you probably think a lot of Newars participated is not the only revolt that Newars has supported , if you look at history from the time of Damodar Pandey to Ranas, lot of Newars has reovlted , be it from house of Tripura from bhaktapur or others that followed it , but as always these revolt has been hijacked , for the most recent I wold like to give you the name Puspe Kamal Dahal ``prachande`` .As always there is one prachande in the story. Like I said history has to be written as it is . I personally come from a family where my forefathers served as general and strategists for Shah Dyansty , my Great grand father was the first person to open a soda factory in Nepal ( even King Mahendra was astonished that we could make soda in Nepal) he also did a lot of things but am not here to publicize my family . What I want to remind you is that not all the Shah kings were anti Newar . There were Shah kings who patronize Newar's Arts and Language too in history. and I think we have to credit them for this and not forget them. 3) If you wanna have an intellectual debate am here for it , I have a good guess that you must also be a student of history like me and eventually will agree to the facts.`
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
634,365,181
|
== Last revertions on articles S.O.S. (Rihanna song) & Umbrella (Rihanna song) == # Please explain me WHY you reverted my changes on pages: “S.O.S. (Rihanna song)” & “Umbrella (Rihanna song)” ??? # Why you think that my screenshots in “Music videos” section in “S.O.S. (Rihanna song)” article is inappropriate (fails policy or something)?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,367,693
|
::* Umbrella (Rihanna song) ::** Links in “Credits” section: It's useful links to authors & companies. ::** Section “Rihanna Interviews”: In this section Rihanna talks about meaning of the song. It's NOT needless!!! It's useful information. ::** Awards table in “Music video” section: I added this table cuz' this video have 4 wins from 14 nominations. It's one of the best videos of all time. ::* S.O.S. (Rihanna song) ::** Screenshots: With this pics section get more understable.For example: Rose Colored Glasses (Kelly Rowland song)#Music video or Live Your Life (T.I. song)#Music video. These “Music video” sections have screenshots (thumbnails) too. You think these screenshots is needless too or not? What difference is??? ::** My sentence about editor (Nabil Mechi): Why you remove it?…
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,369,359
|
::* STOP REVERTING MY CHANGES!!! You better response me.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
634,370,111
|
::::* How about other items that I wrote above?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
634,383,279
|
` == ReferenceBot – Skrippner == Page: I have no idea Diff: I do not know what diff means! Comment/question: SOmeone has been adding material to my page that is unauthorized. Stanley Krippner `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.