dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
642,386,975	== Neutrality and article existing at all == The article reads like a cockfighting apologist and should be rewritten in neutral point of view. That being said, most of the useful and unique information in the article could be easily merged into the cockfighting article under its own heading.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,387,523	` : I didn't pretend any of these users were homophobic, I wouldn't dare, it's certainly not true, but just that some of the words they used to qualify homosexuality ``sexual immorality``, ``sodomite`` could be considered as such. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,388,010	` :::So, I note that ``Sodomite`` and ``sexual immorality`` are gay friendly expressions. I didn't know. I confess I was wrong and I apologize. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,388,799	`Nobody's could be called homophobic, even employing words such as ``sodomite``, ``faggot`` or ``sexual deviant``.`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,392,975	` ::: Oh, fragmentation still exists. It just doesn't matter (except only just barely due to increased numbers of I/O requests to the drive). ::: No, SSDs don't use DDR2 technology. DDR means ``dual data rate``, which describes the bus the DIMMs plug into, not the memory cell structure. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
642,447,484	:Thanks for that. I guess your reason four would have been sufficient to remove it before anything else. I've obviously been a bit over-inclusive in my efforts to get the article onto the mainpage under ITN RD. No-one else semms too fussed. I must admit I thought we couldn't assume other wiki articles could be used as sources - perhaps I should have checked what was supported with WP:RS in each of the individual film articles. I'm happy for those superfluous refs for the awards to be removed. I failed to find Englsh language sources for some of the facts, but I guess that's no surprise for an Italian person.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,453,471	having editited the file-description and	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
642,460,197	` ::The value of this contribution is clear. The story mentions that the normal age for this breed is 12, yet this is a member of that breed that lived to 19 years of age. That is more then noteworthy. The photo stays.. Contribute using your real user name, rather then simply follow all my edits, as you have for the last week or so, please. Thank you `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
642,469,363	Please may I be unblocked?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,477,972	== Artist == *G-friend - Debut - (January,2015)	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
642,478,513	New Recording Labels and Artist	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,478,754	]] There are new groups that debuting last year and also this year, like Sonamoo, Red-velvet, GOT7, etc. For now, here some of the new recording label and also of their groups that debuting this year	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,481,098	== Novaliches High School == School	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
642,511,662	` :::::::::* As you have repeatedly proven that you are inherently incapable of editing according to the policies and practices of this project, and are only here to push your own POV agenda: that of turning this article - NOT A BLP - into some kind of ``tribute puff piece`` to your long dead hero; your disruptive actions are to be expected and will be dealt with in the appropriate manner. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
642,516,062	== Edit wars and questions == Hi - you posted on my talk page re: the Robert Palmer BS. I can't see any proof that the users you mentioned were banned/blocked. Can you point me in that direction? From what I can read, they seem to be able to get away with everything. Thanks for the info.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,520,071	` :::::::::::::* ``...you're repeatedly trying to add negative material to this bio... I'm about to just revert your edits on sight.`` Clear POV pushing and textbook disruptive editing. There really is nothing more to say. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
642,526,166	` :* Please continue. The more you say, the more you bury yourself. We'll just add personal attacks to your laundry list of vios. You continue to display your ignorance, arrogance - and your bias - by whining about ``attack opinion pieces``, when: a) they are feature articles, a concept your thick gray matter seems incapable of grasping; and b) are reliably sourced. You don't get to delete RS just because you don't like them. Want to censor? Move to North Korea. When you get there, I'll even airdrop a certain current movie you won't like either. But let me define a coward for you: A coward is an editor who willfully misinterprets and/or simply ignores several WP policies to push his own POV, and then, when ``some random IP``, calls out his not even subtle game - and he knows he can't defend himself - he runs, like a 5 yr old, to an admin, because the mean ``IP`` wouldn't let him have his way. You really want to see a coward? Not to mention, a child? Buy a mirror. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
642,534,164	::Fishing expedition accomplished. -	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
642,546,292	:I have no idea what the hell you are talking about. I live in Sacramento. I have NEVER lived in San Diego. I'm not sure what meds you take, but don't put me into the midst of your battle. I received a message today from the above and have no idea who it is. However, I am going to report you for stalking me. Stay away from me and my page. I've made NO edits since I was blocked months ago.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	true
642,549,771	==So what do I do? Everyone supports him, I'm just trying to report him.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,552,388	.I will always vandalize your talks. Recently I deleted an article Vishwavijay (2016 film) even when it had the changes that were required as per the guidelines of Wikipedia. But why should I care? I was a damn bloody idiot and I will always be. When that user had asked for the deletion of Mohenjo Daro(film) page when it had the eligibility for speedy deletion, I did not. Why? Because I am a very cunning,bloody idiot,plus rascal! Not only I,but another user Czar is also a bloody damn cunning man like me. I will vandalise entire Wikipedia if users don't appreciate me to become the master of Wikipedia. I will surely become the boss and entire Wikipedia will be under my foot	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
642,555,288	` *I did the caption and will put some time into adding the data in the link in the AM. Thanks Ellin. you really need to find something to do and please, log in or create an account as clearly your enthusiasm, experience with syntax and policy was not obtained with the few edit's you have made, under this Anon I.P. . . . `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
642,564,796	` January 2015 (UTC) *Exclude at this stage. The fact that it is only ``possible`` means that it isn't necessarily noteworthy enough to include. The Polygon notice was raising awareness and/or promoting the event. Perhaps we could wait until after it has finished and reliable sources report on how successful it was. 05:37, 15`	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,585,810	` == ``Tendency`` ? == The lead definition says that resonance is a 'tendency', but in numerous other places (even the second paragraph of the lead), resonance is said to 'occur', or the word 'phenomenon' is used. I would like to suggest that 'tendency' is inappropriate in the definition; if taken literally it seems to indicate that resonance is a property of a system, whereas in fact it is better to say that resonance is something that happens - it is a phenomenon which certain systems sometimes exhibit. I would like to suggest this - paraphrased from ``Physics for scientists and engineers - 4th edition, RA Serway, 1996, Saunders College Publishibng, Philadelphia, etc, p 508: ``A wide range of physical systems, including stretched strings, organ pipes, inductor-capacitor circuits, etc, are capable of oscillating in one or more modes of natural oscillation. If such a system is made to oscillate artificially by applying an appropriate stimulus, then the resulting amplitude of oscillatory response is greatest when the frequency of the stimulus is equal, or nearly equal to one of the natural frequencies of the system. This form of frequency-selective response is called resonance, and the frequency at which the maximum response occurs is the resonant frequency``. `	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
642,601,594	` ::I've extended it some more today, and found quite a few useful sources to work with later. There are a lot of good sources by Googling ``Digital game genres`` 3 I would hardly call it a stub, though, as we have featured articles that are shorter than this, haha. ~ `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,635,801	hi sorry about me cutting the call short. We had a few massive thunderstorms and i'm running like a headless chicken replacing computers and fixing networks all over the city.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
642,636,513	` : I AM NOT THE ``SAN DIEGO IP``!! Go ahead and block me - I have ZERO interest in participating in Wiki for this very reason. You all are armchair deputies with no proof to back your accusations. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
642,648,159	, 15 January 2015 (UTC) :: Disappointing; because, there is a dispute about wikipedia quality. However, I feel conflict to further engage in this dispute on wikipedia. Rejoicing with faithfull patients that in time, things will change. My conflict's source is pride, for which I offer my best wishes for happiness. 20:08	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,654,556	` *I explained to an arb that the delays to the GamerGate case leave things ``in limbo`` in terms of enforcement, but their response was essentially ``you've got the community sanctions; use them``. While that's not anything close to an official mandate in the way that ArbCom-authorised discretionary sanctions will be (I'm not privy to ArbCom's deliberations, but I'd be astonished if DS weren't authorised at the end of the case), it suggests to me that arbs expect, or at least don't object to, admins carrying on almost as if the case weren't there. Given that the final decision could still be some weeks off and no arb has, to my knowledge, said that an open case supersedes pre-existing community sanctions, my attitude is this: if somebody presents a compelling case, with diffs showing recent and persistent or serious misconduct, preferably on the enforcement page, I will evaluate it and impose any sanctions that seem to me to be necessary. you're not the first to complain about TRPoD's tone, so it might well be that a case can be made and sanctions are necessary, but we can't make that sort of decision unless somebody lays out the diffs, so consider this an open invitation to make such a case. Consider it also a promise that I (and hopefully Gamaliel) will evaluate it thoroughly. \| `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
642,660,149	` == Album genre. == While stubbornness is based on poor sources, the war will not end, just a little study, attention, touch, ``Glam Metal '', please have mercy, is not there filter, are throwing everything in a common grave without any precept!`	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
642,667,790	REDIRECT Talk:Buhas bus attack	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
642,670,608	== Possible name after move == If someone is considering moving this page to a new name, please consider the title Vitolo is already taken. Attentively	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
642,671,868	`*I oppose any change. We don't have any articles called ``Republican marches`` that refer to ``members of the Republican Party marching about something``, and hence no disambiguation is necessary. The lead makes it clear what this article is about. This is the best possible title, and is cited in the lead to an English source. There is no better title. — `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
642,674,243	` :::It takes a crystal ball to assert that there will be a year after 2015. We do not know that this is the case, at present. It is impossible to do so. As a result, the present title is not at all temporary, nor does it imply an end date. It simply implies that the crisis has spanned from 2013 until 2015, and it has. Any assertions about the crisis spanning to an amorphous ``present`` rely on a crystal ball, and also on an inherently non-concrete notion of time that is not useful to the reader. — `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
642,675,274	` ::::::::If you don't even accept that deleted material has been ``challenged``, I give up hope. Please try to follow WP:V in future. It's important. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
642,678,579	` == Transliteration == Would anyone with a knowledge of Ukrainian/Russian transliteration into English go through this article and ensure consistency with our guidelines? These are WP:UKROM and WP:RUROM? It is getting a bit confusing, with Aleksandrs and Alexanders, Andreis and Andreys, &c.; It would be much appreciated. — `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
642,688,957	` == Question about what to do == Harry, Hi. One of our Wiki editors, , has been using a redirect template on the WP article Priestly breastplate, redirecting the page to an organization called ``Hoshen`` and which deals with Lesbians-Gays-Bisixuals-Transgenders. At first, when I saw this, I thought it was vandalism, since the topic matter of the article treats on the Breastplate worn by the Jewish High-Priest. I therefore reverted his edit, thinking that he was being disrespectful. Later, I realized that perhaps there is a ``disambiguation`` of the term ``Hoshen,`` since it is used also in Hebrew for the High-Priest's Breastplate. See: Jan 15. What can I do to rectify this issue? - `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
642,691,711	` ::I apologize for thinking that there was vandalism, when, in actuality, there was no vandalism. I have since restored your edit. The problem was with the disambiguation of the term ``Hoshen.`` - `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,700,886	, neither is the majority of the casual public (which includes casual experts) and your constant use of them alienates us	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
642,709,504	Why am I blocked again? He removed the whole content without a valid reason and I undo it.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
642,716,815	== MORE WHINE? == You can dish it out, but you can't take it? Figures. Typical troll. If you're going to continue to be an ass, you've got a lot to learn. I'll be your teacher.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
642,717,677	== Curious == If you were expressing a legitimate concern regarding disruptive behavior and possible blocks, I would have assumed that you would have also warned regarding his disruptive behavior. Curiously, you had not. Perhaps you will explain?	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
642,717,755	== Answer == It is just an error.It was Ural-375,Ural-377,Ural-375 D,Ural 4320 but never was an Ural-357 D.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
642,719,005	::* I'm very happy to talk to anyone who is being reasonable and respectful. I have always reciprocated. My edit long on that is clear. But I will not tolerate disrespect - nor does working on this project require me to. Since thinks it's okay to remove comments from other editor's pages - or otherwise act obnoxiously and non-collaboratively: 1 2 3, 4 5, then let him see what that feels like to be on the receiving end. I do not/will not kowtow to cowards. Or bullies. And if you're going to impose yourself, which I completely understand and appreciate, I just ask that you do so fairly.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
642,722,432	` ::::* Then my response to you is the same as it was to BLP, by definition, only applies to ``living people.`` Kyle has been dead for two years. So just like I told him, BLP does not apply. Also the sources I used, all met WP:RS and were both relevant and notable. They also took up a very small part of the total article, so the fact that you believe they were ``weighted heavily negative`` (whatever that means) would be irrelevant, even if it were true. In fact, the Salon article quoted directly from Kyle's own book. So if there is any concern over ``negativity``, then attribute it to the author of the book - the subject himself. But, in an article that is rapidly taking on the form of a ``testimonial`` or some kind of ``tribute page``, those inclusions met WP:BALANCE. But more importantly, the fact that you would, not only defend Mongo's edits, but ignore his behavior - after you ignored the links I provided you - is surprising and disappointing. It suggests that you're not as fair-minded - or impartial - as you led me to believe. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
642,727,363	`:::What an intriguing claim! Nope we can not ever use opinions as ``fact`` in Wikipedia's voice. Where a news source specifically attributes opinions to specific persons, that attribution is the ``fact`` and the opinion remains opinion. Is this quite clear? ``George Gnarph called Wilbur Wharf a 'raving lunatic'`` is an opinion - we can not use it to say ``William Wharf is a raving lunatic`` or make any such implication that ``William Wharf is widely viewed as a 'raving lunatic'``. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,771,044	` ==:Howard C Cox== Reference Howard C Cox. I have removed all promotional messages and all that is left is fact. SOrry fro misunderstanding, but our supporters have asked for a Wiki entry. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :Then let one of your supporters do it. Don't create the article yourself, you have a conflict of interest. The same goes for Fairfueluk. There is no need to be rude. Please delete all entries I have wasted my time in putting up today. That's my user name Howardcox, entry Howard C Cox and FairFuelUK. I will not be using a service that purports to be helpful but stops honest authors in public life explaining their campaigns honestly. An apology would be welcome — Preceding unsigned comment added by • : You seem to have mistaken Wikipedia, an encyclopedia, for a free advertising service. You also ignored the guidance posted to your talk page. I quite agree you owe an apology. I am totally new to Wikipedia. So I apologise for getting the entry wrong. But I did read the guidelines and changed accordingly. I want to be removed completely from this service now as it seems I am not ready for the closed cartel of operators on here. I genuinely did not know my entry was wrong, so I changed it. Please remove me from Wikipedia or at least tell me how to do it? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :I've had a rummage around and it appears that it's not possible. Your next best option may be to have the account blocked. , can you help? ::I can certainly block the account if wants me to, but I am not sure there is any point in doing so. The pages that the account has created have been deleted, and all that is needed is to walk away and abandon the account. Howardccox is perfectly free to remove all content from his talk page if he likes, leaving it blank, but user talk pages are not normally deleted, as it is sometimes necessary to consult the history of messages to the editor, particularly if he/she ever decides to come back to editing (either with the same account or with a new one). The editor who uses the pseudonym ```` `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
642,792,993	== January 2015 == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alban_Bunjaku https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mattythewhite	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
642,809,845	`(Example: ``I'm about to just revert your edits on sight.``) `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
642,854,801	` ::::::** Well, when the root problem is a miserable, lowlife scumbag like you? BUNG-HO(LE)?! Eh, I basically just tell you to go fuck yourself. Did you really think a ``win`` would be that easy, dumbass? Really? Oh no, no, no... I tried it the nice way... But now you're about to learn just what you fucked with. Enjoy! Couldn't happen to a more deserving pile of shit. Hugs, kisses - and get used to my foot in your ass... `	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
642,855,678	` ::* Just wanted to make sure you saw my answer too, ``notori-ass!`` HA, what a joke! Because I really DO want to annoy you, you useless little turd! And I(we) intend to do so, so much more than that. Careful what you wish for bitch... `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
642,876,281	` :LoL, ``We don't want to hear?`` Elitist Douche who obviously has a disdain for us IP-editors to add to your disgraceful manner, I for one have found Jacks comments very insightful and interesting so I appreciate them and Maxis too. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
642,876,573	I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which are detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
642,877,163	Also, frankly, you're the one being passive aggressive. If you're going to give your opinion about someone, or even insult them, don't beat around the bush. You're the one being exactly what passive aggressive entails:, calling him indirectly ignorant of your (the groups) rules, acting in an elitist and authoritarian manner, calling him childish, indirectly threatening him with administrative action and so forth. I repeat, you are a douche.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
642,912,072	== Thank You ) == Hello Jonesey95! ::Thank you for fixing my recent reference citation. ::I am new to Wikipedia but very keen about editing ) ::You can brief me with regard to citation as I am very wiling to learn maximum I can. Thank you:)	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
642,917,846	` :Fixed. Also, since when did we put a bold title of ``Sources``. along with a bunch of book refs at the top of a section? (bizarre...) I moved them to... (drum roll) the sources section at the bottom. I'm sure this article needs more work. - '''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
642,928,893	` ::Since ``hand washing`` is a generic word used for different TYPES of hand washing, and each specific hand washing has its own specific laws on how it should be performed (e.g. with or without a vessel; three intermittent times in the morning and with a vessel in most customs, etc.), the detail of the mitzvah can only be learned in the main body of the article. Customs also differ with different Jewish ethnic groups. I think that ``negel vasser`` and the three pourings is the generally accepted practice in the morning (in most Jewish homes), although the kabbalists add a fourth pouring. This, as noted, is explained in the body of the main article. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
642,938,236	` == ==The SPÖ in Mein Kampf == At one moment Hitler lauded the Social Democratic Party in his mind (Friedrich Austerlitz, Anton David, Viktor Adler and Wilhelm Ellenbogen are mentioned by their last names on p. 66 of Mein Kampf) for championing ``das allgemeine und geheime Wahlrecht`` (Mein Kampf, p. 39) or universal suffrage, saying to himself that this must lead to a weakening of the so-hated-by-him Habsburg monarchic rule. When he later saw more of what the party was about however, he suggested its members were being servile to the Slavs to the point of debasing themselves, as one who is utterly mendicant, whilst disfavoring the Germans in an attempt to save the multiethnic melting pot of Austria-Hungary. It appears he was angered that he was asked to join the trade union and that men of Jewish heritage were influential in the party (Mein Kampf, pgs. 39, 40, 65 and 66).Mein Kampf, Erster Band, 2. Kapitel `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
642,938,698	` == Disparity between Traditional Jewish Dates and Academic Dates == , I will desist from making edits in this current article, since I feel my input might be misconstrued or disruptive, and that, of course, would not be my intent. However, please be apprised that there is a vast disparity between the traditional Jewish method of calibrating years based on a carefully guarded oral tradition, as opposed to modern methods used primarily by Christians who rely heavily upon the modern academic methods applied in dating chronology. The two are still reconcilable, but it will take a vast amount of effort and a person of ``long wind`` (patience) and extreme diligence to even begin to explain where the discrepancies have ``crept-in`` to ancient chronologies. The Jews insist that there were only 210 years of slavery in Egypt, although the 430 years mentioned in the Hebrew Bible are merely counted from the time of Isaac's birth, until the departure of Israel from Egypt. You see, ``strangers in a land not theirs,`` really begins with Abraham's seed in the land of Canaan. Anyway, my view is not to interrupt your work, but to let it proceed on course. I would, however, have preferred to see you mention more about the ``other method`` practiced by mainstream Judaism, whether it is accepted or not by Christian or academic circles. This would have given more balance to the current article. I have an inkling that someone will eventually start another article dealing only the Jewish tradition of biblical chronology. If I might say, for us, the Scroll of Antiochus is considered a reliable source. CERTAIN FLAWS WITH MODERN SCHOLARSHIP: I wish to point out something about modern scholarship that I think we should be aware of. Research has been carried out in France by a certain Christian Robin and André Lemaire on the subject of the Queen of Sheba and King Solomon. André Lemaire wrote: “The hypothesis of a Sheba in Northern Arabia at the beginning of the 1st millennium BCE (Noth 1968: 223-224; Würthwein 1977: 121; Eph‘al 21984: 88-89, 227-229; Garbini 1984; Sarkiö 1994:190; Mulder 1998: 509-510) has no basis and is generally abandoned (Robin 1992: col. 1109-1110, 1118; Avanzini 1996: 13; Kitchen 1997b: 128.” He also writes: “The first mention of Sheba in Neo-Assyrian texts is to be dated mid-8th c. BCE with the story of a caravan of 200 camels coming from Tayma and Sheba to Hindanu (Middle-Euphrates) (Cavigneaux – Ismaïl 1990: 339-357; Frame 1995: 300; Younger 2003: 279-282; Holladay 2006: 319-321).” Contrary to modern scholarship, it should be noted here that, in Jewish tradition, king Solomon did not begin his reign in circa 1,000 BCE, as purported by modern scholarship, but rather in circa 843 BCE, as we find in Jewish tradition. Likewise, in Jewish tradition, the first Temple was destroyed in 422 BCE, rather than in the erroneous date used by scholars of the western world to fix its destruction, i.e. in 586 BCE. Modern scholars totally ignore Jewish tradition and wrongly put historical events at least 200 years earlier, which accounts for the discrepancies in calibrating these important events and not finding historical records to substantiate these events. The one major flaw in their critical view of Jewish texts is the belief that if they cannot find an archaeological document affirming a certain event mentioned in the Bible, for them it is as though the event never happened. This is a fallacy in logic. To begin to tackle this tremendous difficulty with modern scholarship and Jewish tradition, we must first lay down a premise that will follow us all throughout this discussion, and that is the fact that historical records have been kept by Jews since ancient times, and they have often preserved these very written accounts of events by marking their dates in the Seleucid Era counting. This is vital, as without which information, it will be virtually impossible to determine the sequence of events and to correctly compare them with dates in the Julian / Gregorian calendars. The Aramaic ``Scroll of Antiochus,`` known in Hebrew as ``Megillath Benei Hašmonai`` (The Scroll of the Sons of Asamoneus), is a curious document, alleged by Rabbi Saadia Gaon in his Introduction to ``Ha-Eggron`` to have been written by the elders of the schools of Hillel and Shammai in the Chaldaic language, meaning, a document that dates back earlier than the book Seder Olam, composed by Rabbi Yose b. Halpetha in the 2nd century CE. In that book, the ``Scroll of Antiochus,`` we find this remarkable remark, viz., that ``from the Second Temple's rebuilding till the 23rd year of the reign of Antiochus Eupator, son of Antiochus Epiphanes, who invaded Judaea, there had transpired 213 years in total.`` בִּשׁנַת עַסרִין וּתלָת שְׁנִין לְמִמלְכֵיהּ, ב	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
642,939,140	` == Only in Wikipepedia == Only here will you find the types of administrators who will allow questions and comments to be posted but block a user from answering them. Yep, Bbb23 or as we like to call you, , thats's pointed at you. Of course as administrators go your about average, and being average around here is nothing to talk about! Like you really think you can block me! What a friggin joke homie, you don't have half the brains at this as I do. Hey Bbb 4 brains, you messed with my parents and my friends too and now we're going to mess with you and your little boyfriend . And for our favorite Pin Head , Ah huh you Didja know over achieving and butt kissing all over this just is a way to make up for you lack else where? Try the real world, because your time on here is limited. Hey Bbb butt head, try it too. Keep looking back because you can't block everyone and at any time 1-1000 are just waiting to have their fun. You chould have talked to my parents, but no just act like they know every little thing about the rules here and treat them like old hands here. You needed to show your power here so you messed with them and even when I sent you a note, you extended the blocked on my dad's account for supposed Block EvasionDon't you read?? It was from me!. The more I and my friends see, it's you and your types, that will keep Wikipedia the 2nd rate, online, circle jerking, half true/half BS, so called ``encyclopedia`` that it has been, is today and will always be. Real editors don't fight over this silly poop, nonconstructive editing, better all it means is I want my name there and lets not forget to add all those GAs and FAs that you've worked on right on your User page. This isn't Facebook, if that's your thing you two go there!`	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
642,940,143	` :LoL, ``We don't want to hear?`` Elitist Douche who obviously has a disdain for us IP-editors to add to your disgraceful manner, I for one have found Jacks comments very insightful and interesting so I appreciate them and Maxis too. I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which is detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us. Also, frankly, you're the one being passive aggressive. If you're going to give your opinion about someone, or even insult them, don't beat around the bush. You're the one being exactly what passive aggressive entails:, calling him indirectly ignorant of your (the groups) rules, acting in an elitist and authoritarian manner, calling him childish, indirectly threatening him with administrative action and so forth. I repeat, you are a douche. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
642,940,854	Hello, considering Europe a continent, I believe is done by human convention, not by a definition of a large continuous land mass which is the continent of Eurasia. jcardazzi	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,941,087	` == Greek club stats == Somebody please provide a reliable source for his 2014/15 stats, and stop using SOCCERWAY.com as ``support``, this site says ``?/?`` for this seasons, ``15 games/one goal`` for 2013/14. So, per some ``additions``, he scored 20 goals in 30 games in the FIRST HALF of this season, to total the 45/21 that have been inserted and re-inserted? Quite impossible no? `	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
642,948,128	` : I think you misunderstood. I didn't tag the File:Colorado Buffaloes alternate logo.gif, but I did tag the File:Colorado Buffaloes alternate logo.png file. The GIF version looks better than the PNG version, so I swapped it out and that left the PNG version unused. Therefore, it is orphaned. ' ''''' `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
642,948,433	:Re fungi: yes, that's what the paragraph above the list of 4 kingdoms explains, if you read it. The 4 kingdoms are a summary of that paragraph, so fungi should be listed as a separate kingdom.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
642,953,273	Wikipedia page for Michael Reich January 17, 2015 I have just discovered that someone named Michael Saltsman has entered incorrect and offensive information on my Wikipedia page. Saltsman is a well-known virulent opponent of minimum wage increases who works for the National Restaurant Association's Employment Policies Institute. He often trades in character slander as he is not competent to judge professional economic research. I am a labor economist at the University of California, Berkeley, with many published research articles on minimum wage effects. I would like to remove the information that is incorrect and/or offensive. I tried to do so but the changes were reversed. Please tell me how to make these changes. Michael Reich Professor, University of California, Berkeley	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
642,966,287	::::I do, but for single player things. Wikipedia is the closest I come to online interaction. 22:17, January 17, 2015 (UTC)	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
643,000,273	`: ``tremendous lengths to research``...? LOL! Anyway, Americans like to go with what sounds better. (I bet you loved it when they referred to the Picts as ``Woads`` in the 2004 film King Arthur)). It's Hollywood, get over it. - '''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
643,030,283	` == Naploeon vs. Napoleon Epic Rap Battle == This is mentioned, if not in this particular video, in another one (it's actually Hitler vs Darth Vader now that i'm remembering it). by Epic Rap Battles of History. Will add later. '''''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
643,030,819	` ::::::::: Not quite. The first step is to figure out how copyright and free licensing works. :::::::::For the most part, every creative work that anyone creates (in the U.S. and most other countries) is automatically copyrighted. This can include artwork, graphics, music, etc. Copyright means what it sounds like - the ``right to copy``, and that lies with the author of the image. :::::::::Now, you can't simply use another person's copyrighted work without their permission (sure, you can put together a graphic and post it on reddit and nothing will likely happen - we're talking from a technical and legal point of view, though). If I make a painting, and you take that painting and stick it on a shirt and sell it without my permission, I could potentially take you to court. :::::::::There is an exception to this, called ``fair use`` in the United States (and ``fair dealing`` in some other places). Since Wikimedia is based in the U.S., we'll look at it from a U.S. perspective: fair usage allows you to use a copyrighted work, without permission, with the following factors taken into consideration: ::::::::: * The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes ::::::::: * The nature of the copyrighted work ::::::::: * The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole ::::::::: * The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work :::::::::It's a case by case basis, but fair use allows, for example, Wikipedia to display short samples of songs in its articles, or a low-resolution picture of Mario in the Mario article, all without permission. But fair use is a whole other topic - back to copyright. :::::::::This is where the free license movement and the Creative Commons step in. The Creative Commons are a suite of licenses that allow authors to license their works in a way that allow anyone to use them, as long as the original author is attributed. There are other optional limitations, such as not allowing people to use your work for commercial purposes, or requiring anyone that uses your work to license their derivative under a similar license. The Wikimedia Commons is a host of free media, for anyone to use for any purpose (including commercial). This ``free license movement`` has lead to hundreds of millions of works being made available for all to use freely, often for educational purposes. For example, I myself have seen a couple of my freely licensed images appear in news articles or educational publications - it's a nice thing to contribute to. :::::::::So, this hopefully answers your question about whether or not you can create a work for the Commons that is composed of other images. You can, as long as the images you are using are also freely licensed. Remember, the point of free licenses is the let people to use works for their own purposes without seeking permission. If the images are copyrighted (or show no sign of free licensing), you don't have the right to copy the work to use in your own work. And yes, you should cite the sources of all the works that go into your own, even if they're in the public domain - claiming them as your own work is plagiarism. I know this is a lot to hit you with, and it is a broad overview, so feel free to ask for clarification or more details. ~'''' Contribs `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
643,037,809	` :Thanx for the note. Very often editors change my work without explanation. Right now I am dealing with another page for which an editor simply reversed work I spent at least half an hour on. No word of explanation. As for the lists, numbering the species has the advantage of showing you unambiguously how many species there are in the genus. I have seen many pages which begin ``This is a genus of 30-40 species`` followed by a list of 53, or whatever. The estimates are frequently way off the mark and subject to change. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
643,042,310	==recent deleatist vandalization== dear extreemist. Your recent jabber on extreemist groups gave no indication why you were deleating ligitimate links from the see also freedom fighters and opression. Younappear to be promulgating terror by depriving the world of forums to work out differences and ideas. Please stop yout jewish hate. (pastdr ban text here but server deleted it)). You are cowards and dishonest.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
643,042,433	== Bongwarrior == My dearest Bongwarrior, How the fuck are you allowed to edit anything on this site with a name like Bongwarrior, How? Honestly, how? Yours sincerely, Garfunkel Felchmaster.	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
643,059,406	` :::The hypocrisy of Bishonen. It is ironic when this poor excuse for a human being and an admin Bishonen says something like ``it's a sad, even heart-breaking, case that we need to approach with gentleness``. This Attila the Hun lookalike is the farthest thing from anything that spells gentleness. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
643,072,117	Wikipedia is not the place to spread unsubstantiated criminal accusations. Please exercise caution in the future.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,076,448	== Greetings == Hi, Cirt - I hope you will consider stopping accusing me of bad faith editing. If you have any qualms with particular edits, I'd love to hear what is wrong with them and how my approach can be improved. I'd like to direct your attention to two quotes on user pages. The first is from Jimmy Wales: :== You can edit this page! == :Really, you can! If you would like to, please feel free to do so. Make an edit – or even several! After all, that is what Wikipedia is all about.'' And the second is from Neelix's user page: :Wikipedia is thoroughly, inherently collaborative. In the humanities division of academia, we still hold to the ideal of the lone genius, expecting that each humanities scholar be the sole author of his or her journal articles. In the sciences and social sciences, we expect that there be two or three authors for each journal article. On Wikipedia, every well-developed article has many more than three authors. The result is an ever-increasingly accurate approximation of objectivity. This objectivity is not the pseudo-objectivity that results from ignoring our biases as authors, but is rather the result of diverse perspectives all being covered proportionally through discussion between people who have those diverse perspectives. We write better when we write together. I think those principles are pretty neat. And I am certain my editing adheres to them. If you'd like to contact me off the site, let me know - I'd be happy to share ways to get in touch.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,079,528	== Tag reverts == What's up with the IP that keeps removing the date from the COI tag? ☮ღ☺	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
643,083,099	== Dispute notice == Hi, Cirt. I've started a discussion on the dispute resolution noticeboard about this monring's activity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,083,461	== Directly repeated information in the lead and body == Please stop undoing my edits of the lead and rest of the article wholesale. There are a number of directly repeated phrases in the lead - text that appears verbatim later on in the article. There is no reason the same text should be repeated multiple times.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
643,087,656	==Unified accounts== Thanks for your message, but I have forgotten the usernames and passwords of the DE and NL accunts I made and of the wikimedia commons account. Is there any way in which I can retrieve them? Thank you in advance	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,124,676	To respond to your assertion that what I posted what irrelevant, the SPÖ to this day wields a great deal of influence over the ÖGB.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,126,713	`On p. 43 of Murphy's translationhttps://ia801807.us.archive.org/26/items/MeinKampfEnglish/mein-kampf-english.pdf of Mein Kampf, Hitler declares: ``Then a day came when the more redoubtable of my adversaries resorted to the most effective weapon they had to replace the force of reason. This was intimidation and physical force. Some of the leaders among my adversaries ordered me to leave the building or else get flung down from the scaffolding.`` `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,126,985	(Chapter II, Volume I)	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,130,217	` You did not have to retract your vote on the Liberty photo.. :`	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
643,130,278	As to dates, when there are birth–death parentheticals: Petrarch (1304–1374) is used not (1304–74) for an infobox, the style then can be used throughout the infobox in order to maintain consistency in styles.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
643,136,506	== Still working on the English comparison of road signs == Are you working on the English comparison of road signs now?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,140,796	did a grammar and punctuation cleanup, primarily on the Occurence in nature section. I'm not an expert on the subject. Large sections of the article have no or minimal inline citations, so I added the refimprove tag. ~	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
643,149,595	` == Edits == Hello, thank you for letting me know about your changes, I briefly looked over the article I changed (technically changed back) and was unaware of any errors, The reason I made the changes was due to me looking at another article, and noticing the user named ``Lukeno94`` making an incorrect edit, so I found my way to his page of edits, and it seemed he was targeting a specific IP address and changing anything that person edited. I apologize if I made an error, I was simply trying to help out what looked like someone being bullied.`	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
643,154,338	:thanks so much! truly appreciate it and excited to continue contributing.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
643,160,023	===Solution based on intersection of at least four spheres, not TDOA and not Multilateration=== Position is based on the intersection of four or more spheres. See the navigation equations. These equations describe spheres. The solution has nothing to do with hyperboloids or multilateration.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
643,176,769	a , please improve Typhoon Mekkhala's page because i'm created the page, for shortly knownly as Mekkhala. 16:46, 19 January 2015	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
643,188,751	`== edit request == Under the section Head coaching record it says ``The 112 wins were returned to Joe Paterno on January 16, 2015 as a part of a settlement between the NCAA and Penn State. Those 112 wins make Paterno the most victorious coach of all time in NCAA football with a total of 409 wins``. John Gagliardi has 489 wins. The most in NCAA football. Please edit the page so it reads ``The 112 wins were returned to Joe Paterno on January 16, 2015 as a part of a settlement between the NCAA and Penn State. Those 112 wins make Paterno the most victorious coach of all time in FBS NCAA football with a total of 409 wins``. Thanks `	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
643,189,218	See page 48 of the Freeh report for Freeh's explanation of what news articles are trying to explain. http://progress.psu.edu/assets/content/REPORT_FINAL_071212.pdf	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
643,189,348	yeah, i'm got one facebook too, but it's my second account, go and link me:https://www.facebook.com/votestralightcouncilorkinlargadas?fref=ts. and you not known just i'm changing the utc time for mekkhala? i'm link this for utc time.:http://www.typhoon2000.ph/ and for emergencies, i link this. but this is mekkhala!:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/01W/imagery/rgb-animated.gif	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
643,190,749	This is not season 5. History's own webpage (which is correct - you cannot argue against the people who make it) says these new episodes are part of season 4. On iTunes it shows that these new episodes are season 5 but this is wrong. For a while, History's own webpage had these episodes down as season 5 but reverted it a couple of weeks in to the series. Also, look at the 'Complete Series 4' Top Gear USA DVD. It was released in December of last year and contains these episodes that we are discussing along with the ten we can both agree were in series 4. SERIES 5 HAS NOT BEEN MADE YET.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
643,194,191	` ==Sockpuppet investigation== `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
643,195,373	I only removed some, to correctly add a title section	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
643,210,772	== Beginnings == In 1975, Sakamoto released an album with Toshiyuki Tsuchitori entitled Disappointment-Hateruma which is not mentioned in the article.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
643,217,250	:Because it was incoherent and promotional.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
643,220,663	. :: As a daily NC headphones user I'd say it is likely that they are healthier than regular phones since there's a tendency not to raise the volume so high with them	2,015	false	article	random	train	false

642,386,975

== Neutrality and article existing at all == The article reads like a cockfighting apologist and should be rewritten in neutral point of view. That being said, most of the useful and unique information in the article could be easily merged into the cockfighting article under its own heading.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,387,523

` : I didn't pretend any of these users were homophobic, I wouldn't dare, it's certainly not true, but just that some of the words they used to qualify homosexuality ``sexual immorality``, ``sodomite`` could be considered as such. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,388,010

` :::So, I note that ``Sodomite`` and ``sexual immorality`` are gay friendly expressions. I didn't know. I confess I was wrong and I apologize. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,388,799

`Nobody's could be called homophobic, even employing words such as ``sodomite``, ``faggot`` or ``sexual deviant``.`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,392,975

` ::: Oh, fragmentation still exists. It just doesn't matter (except only just barely due to increased numbers of I/O requests to the drive). ::: No, SSDs don't use DDR2 technology. DDR means ``dual data rate``, which describes the bus the DIMMs plug into, not the memory cell structure. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

642,447,484

:Thanks for that. I guess your reason four would have been sufficient to remove it before anything else. I've obviously been a bit over-inclusive in my efforts to get the article onto the mainpage under ITN RD. No-one else semms too fussed. I must admit I thought we couldn't assume other wiki articles could be used as sources - perhaps I should have checked what was supported with WP:RS in each of the individual film articles. I'm happy for those superfluous refs for the awards to be removed. I failed to find Englsh language sources for some of the facts, but I guess that's no surprise for an Italian person.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,453,471

having editited the file-description and

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

642,460,197

` ::The value of this contribution is clear. The story mentions that the normal age for this breed is 12, yet this is a member of that breed that lived to 19 years of age. That is more then noteworthy. The photo stays.. Contribute using your real user name, rather then simply follow all my edits, as you have for the last week or so, please. Thank you `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

642,469,363

Please may I be unblocked?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,477,972

== Artist == *G-friend - Debut - (January,2015)

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

642,478,513

New Recording Labels and Artist

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,478,754

]] There are new groups that debuting last year and also this year, like Sonamoo, Red-velvet, GOT7, etc. For now, here some of the new recording label and also of their groups that debuting this year

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,481,098

== Novaliches High School == School

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

642,511,662

` :::::::::* As you have repeatedly proven that you are inherently incapable of editing according to the policies and practices of this project, and are only here to push your own POV agenda: that of turning this article - NOT A BLP - into some kind of ``tribute puff piece`` to your long dead hero; your disruptive actions are to be expected and will be dealt with in the appropriate manner. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

642,516,062

== Edit wars and questions == Hi - you posted on my talk page re: the Robert Palmer BS. I can't see any proof that the users you mentioned were banned/blocked. Can you point me in that direction? From what I can read, they seem to be able to get away with everything. Thanks for the info.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,520,071

` :::::::::::::* ``...you're repeatedly trying to add negative material to this bio... I'm about to just revert your edits on sight.`` Clear POV pushing and textbook disruptive editing. There really is nothing more to say. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

642,526,166

` :* Please continue. The more you say, the more you bury yourself. We'll just add personal attacks to your laundry list of vios. You continue to display your ignorance, arrogance - and your bias - by whining about ``attack opinion pieces``, when: a) they are feature articles, a concept your thick gray matter seems incapable of grasping; and b) are reliably sourced. You don't get to delete RS just because you don't like them. Want to censor? Move to North Korea. When you get there, I'll even airdrop a certain current movie you won't like either. But let me define a coward for you: A coward is an editor who willfully misinterprets and/or simply ignores several WP policies to push his own POV, and then, when ``some random IP``, calls out his not even subtle game - and he knows he can't defend himself - he runs, like a 5 yr old, to an admin, because the mean ``IP`` wouldn't let him have his way. You really want to see a coward? Not to mention, a child? Buy a mirror. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

642,534,164

::Fishing expedition accomplished. -

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

642,546,292

:I have no idea what the hell you are talking about. I live in Sacramento. I have NEVER lived in San Diego. I'm not sure what meds you take, but don't put me into the midst of your battle. I received a message today from the above and have no idea who it is. However, I am going to report you for stalking me. Stay away from me and my page. I've made NO edits since I was blocked months ago.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

true

642,549,771

==So what do I do? Everyone supports him, I'm just trying to report him.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,552,388

.I will always vandalize your talks. Recently I deleted an article Vishwavijay (2016 film) even when it had the changes that were required as per the guidelines of Wikipedia. But why should I care? I was a damn bloody idiot and I will always be. When that user had asked for the deletion of Mohenjo Daro(film) page when it had the eligibility for speedy deletion, I did not. Why? Because I am a very cunning,bloody idiot,plus rascal! Not only I,but another user Czar is also a bloody damn cunning man like me. I will vandalise entire Wikipedia if users don't appreciate me to become the master of Wikipedia. I will surely become the boss and entire Wikipedia will be under my foot

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

642,555,288

` *I did the caption and will put some time into adding the data in the link in the AM. Thanks Ellin. you really need to find something to do and please, log in or create an account as clearly your enthusiasm, experience with syntax and policy was not obtained with the few edit's you have made, under this Anon I.P. . . . `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

642,564,796

` January 2015 (UTC) *Exclude at this stage. The fact that it is only ``possible`` means that it isn't necessarily noteworthy enough to include. The Polygon notice was raising awareness and/or promoting the event. Perhaps we could wait until after it has finished and reliable sources report on how successful it was. 05:37, 15`

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,585,810

` == ``Tendency`` ? == The lead definition says that resonance is a 'tendency', but in numerous other places (even the second paragraph of the lead), resonance is said to 'occur', or the word 'phenomenon' is used. I would like to suggest that 'tendency' is inappropriate in the definition; if taken literally it seems to indicate that resonance is a property of a system, whereas in fact it is better to say that resonance is something that happens - it is a phenomenon which certain systems sometimes exhibit. I would like to suggest this - paraphrased from ``Physics for scientists and engineers - 4th edition, RA Serway, 1996, Saunders College Publishibng, Philadelphia, etc, p 508: ``A wide range of physical systems, including stretched strings, organ pipes, inductor-capacitor circuits, etc, are capable of oscillating in one or more modes of natural oscillation. If such a system is made to oscillate artificially by applying an appropriate stimulus, then the resulting amplitude of oscillatory response is greatest when the frequency of the stimulus is equal, or nearly equal to one of the natural frequencies of the system. This form of frequency-selective response is called resonance, and the frequency at which the maximum response occurs is the resonant frequency``. `

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

642,601,594

` ::I've extended it some more today, and found quite a few useful sources to work with later. There are a lot of good sources by Googling ``Digital game genres`` 3 I would hardly call it a stub, though, as we have featured articles that are shorter than this, haha. ~ `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,635,801

hi sorry about me cutting the call short. We had a few massive thunderstorms and i'm running like a headless chicken replacing computers and fixing networks all over the city.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

642,636,513

` : I AM NOT THE ``SAN DIEGO IP``!! Go ahead and block me - I have ZERO interest in participating in Wiki for this very reason. You all are armchair deputies with no proof to back your accusations. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

642,648,159

, 15 January 2015 (UTC) :: Disappointing; because, there is a dispute about wikipedia quality. However, I feel conflict to further engage in this dispute on wikipedia. Rejoicing with faithfull patients that in time, things will change. My conflict's source is pride, for which I offer my best wishes for happiness. 20:08

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,654,556

` *I explained to an arb that the delays to the GamerGate case leave things ``in limbo`` in terms of enforcement, but their response was essentially ``you've got the community sanctions; use them``. While that's not anything close to an official mandate in the way that ArbCom-authorised discretionary sanctions will be (I'm not privy to ArbCom's deliberations, but I'd be astonished if DS weren't authorised at the end of the case), it suggests to me that arbs expect, or at least don't object to, admins carrying on almost as if the case weren't there. Given that the final decision could still be some weeks off and no arb has, to my knowledge, said that an open case supersedes pre-existing community sanctions, my attitude is this: if somebody presents a compelling case, with diffs showing recent and persistent or serious misconduct, preferably on the enforcement page, I will evaluate it and impose any sanctions that seem to me to be necessary. you're not the first to complain about TRPoD's tone, so it might well be that a case can be made and sanctions are necessary, but we can't make that sort of decision unless somebody lays out the diffs, so consider this an open invitation to make such a case. Consider it also a promise that I (and hopefully Gamaliel) will evaluate it thoroughly. | `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

642,660,149

` == Album genre. == While stubbornness is based on poor sources, the war will not end, just a little study, attention, touch, ``Glam Metal '', please have mercy, is not there filter, are throwing everything in a common grave without any precept!`

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

642,667,790

REDIRECT Talk:Buhas bus attack

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

642,670,608

== Possible name after move == If someone is considering moving this page to a new name, please consider the title Vitolo is already taken. Attentively

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

642,671,868

`*I oppose any change. We don't have any articles called ``Republican marches`` that refer to ``members of the Republican Party marching about something``, and hence no disambiguation is necessary. The lead makes it clear what this article is about. This is the best possible title, and is cited in the lead to an English source. There is no better title. — `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

642,674,243

` :::It takes a crystal ball to assert that there will be a year after 2015. We do not know that this is the case, at present. It is impossible to do so. As a result, the present title is not at all temporary, nor does it imply an end date. It simply implies that the crisis has spanned from 2013 until 2015, and it has. Any assertions about the crisis spanning to an amorphous ``present`` rely on a crystal ball, and also on an inherently non-concrete notion of time that is not useful to the reader. — `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

642,675,274

` ::::::::If you don't even accept that deleted material has been ``challenged``, I give up hope. Please try to follow WP:V in future. It's important. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

642,678,579

` == Transliteration == Would anyone with a knowledge of Ukrainian/Russian transliteration into English go through this article and ensure consistency with our guidelines? These are WP:UKROM and WP:RUROM? It is getting a bit confusing, with Aleksandrs and Alexanders, Andreis and Andreys, &c.; It would be much appreciated. — `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

642,688,957

` == Question about what to do == Harry, Hi. One of our Wiki editors, , has been using a redirect template on the WP article Priestly breastplate, redirecting the page to an organization called ``Hoshen`` and which deals with Lesbians-Gays-Bisixuals-Transgenders. At first, when I saw this, I thought it was vandalism, since the topic matter of the article treats on the Breastplate worn by the Jewish High-Priest. I therefore reverted his edit, thinking that he was being disrespectful. Later, I realized that perhaps there is a ``disambiguation`` of the term ``Hoshen,`` since it is used also in Hebrew for the High-Priest's Breastplate. See: Jan 15. What can I do to rectify this issue? - `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

642,691,711

` ::I apologize for thinking that there was vandalism, when, in actuality, there was no vandalism. I have since restored your edit. The problem was with the disambiguation of the term ``Hoshen.`` - `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,700,886

, neither is the majority of the casual public (which includes casual experts) and your constant use of them alienates us

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

642,709,504

Why am I blocked again? He removed the whole content without a valid reason and I undo it.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

642,716,815

== MORE WHINE? == You can dish it out, but you can't take it? Figures. Typical troll. If you're going to continue to be an ass, you've got a lot to learn. I'll be your teacher.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

642,717,677

== Curious == If you were expressing a legitimate concern regarding disruptive behavior and possible blocks, I would have assumed that you would have also warned regarding his disruptive behavior. Curiously, you had not. Perhaps you will explain?

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

642,717,755

== Answer == It is just an error.It was Ural-375,Ural-377,Ural-375 D,Ural 4320 but never was an Ural-357 D.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

642,719,005

::* I'm very happy to talk to anyone who is being reasonable and respectful. I have always reciprocated. My edit long on that is clear. But I will not tolerate disrespect - nor does working on this project require me to. Since thinks it's okay to remove comments from other editor's pages - or otherwise act obnoxiously and non-collaboratively: 1 2 3, 4 5, then let him see what that feels like to be on the receiving end. I do not/will not kowtow to cowards. Or bullies. And if you're going to impose yourself, which I completely understand and appreciate, I just ask that you do so fairly.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

642,722,432

` ::::* Then my response to you is the same as it was to BLP, by definition, only applies to ``living people.`` Kyle has been dead for two years. So just like I told him, BLP does not apply. Also the sources I used, all met WP:RS and were both relevant and notable. They also took up a very small part of the total article, so the fact that you believe they were ``weighted heavily negative`` (whatever that means) would be irrelevant, even if it were true. In fact, the Salon article quoted directly from Kyle's own book. So if there is any concern over ``negativity``, then attribute it to the author of the book - the subject himself. But, in an article that is rapidly taking on the form of a ``testimonial`` or some kind of ``tribute page``, those inclusions met WP:BALANCE. But more importantly, the fact that you would, not only defend Mongo's edits, but ignore his behavior - after you ignored the links I provided you - is surprising and disappointing. It suggests that you're not as fair-minded - or impartial - as you led me to believe. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

642,727,363

`:::What an intriguing claim! Nope we can not ever use opinions as ``fact`` in Wikipedia's voice. Where a news source specifically attributes opinions to specific persons, that attribution is the ``fact`` and the opinion remains opinion. Is this quite clear? ``George Gnarph called Wilbur Wharf a 'raving lunatic'`` is an opinion - we can not use it to say ``William Wharf is a raving lunatic`` or make any such implication that ``William Wharf is widely viewed as a 'raving lunatic'``. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,771,044

` ==:Howard C Cox== Reference Howard C Cox. I have removed all promotional messages and all that is left is fact. SOrry fro misunderstanding, but our supporters have asked for a Wiki entry. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :Then let one of your supporters do it. Don't create the article yourself, you have a conflict of interest. The same goes for Fairfueluk. There is no need to be rude. Please delete all entries I have wasted my time in putting up today. That's my user name Howardcox, entry Howard C Cox and FairFuelUK. I will not be using a service that purports to be helpful but stops honest authors in public life explaining their campaigns honestly. An apology would be welcome — Preceding unsigned comment added by • : You seem to have mistaken Wikipedia, an encyclopedia, for a free advertising service. You also ignored the guidance posted to your talk page. I quite agree you owe an apology. I am totally new to Wikipedia. So I apologise for getting the entry wrong. But I did read the guidelines and changed accordingly. I want to be removed completely from this service now as it seems I am not ready for the closed cartel of operators on here. I genuinely did not know my entry was wrong, so I changed it. Please remove me from Wikipedia or at least tell me how to do it? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :I've had a rummage around and it appears that it's not possible. Your next best option may be to have the account blocked. , can you help? ::I can certainly block the account if wants me to, but I am not sure there is any point in doing so. The pages that the account has created have been deleted, and all that is needed is to walk away and abandon the account. Howardccox is perfectly free to remove all content from his talk page if he likes, leaving it blank, but user talk pages are not normally deleted, as it is sometimes necessary to consult the history of messages to the editor, particularly if he/she ever decides to come back to editing (either with the same account or with a new one). The editor who uses the pseudonym ```` `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

642,792,993

== January 2015 == http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alban_Bunjaku https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mattythewhite

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

642,809,845

`(Example: ``I'm about to just revert your edits on sight.``) `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

642,854,801

` ::::::** Well, when the root problem is a miserable, lowlife scumbag like you? BUNG-HO(LE)?! Eh, I basically just tell you to go fuck yourself. Did you really think a ``win`` would be that easy, dumbass? Really? Oh no, no, no... I tried it the nice way... But now you're about to learn just what you fucked with. Enjoy! Couldn't happen to a more deserving pile of shit. Hugs, kisses - and get used to my foot in your ass... `

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

642,855,678

` ::* Just wanted to make sure you saw my answer too, ``notori-ass!`` HA, what a joke! Because I really DO want to annoy you, you useless little turd! And I(we) intend to do so, so much more than that. Careful what you wish for bitch... `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

642,876,281

` :LoL, ``We don't want to hear?`` Elitist Douche who obviously has a disdain for us IP-editors to add to your disgraceful manner, I for one have found Jacks comments very insightful and interesting so I appreciate them and Maxis too. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

642,876,573

I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which are detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

642,877,163

Also, frankly, you're the one being passive aggressive. If you're going to give your opinion about someone, or even insult them, don't beat around the bush. You're the one being exactly what passive aggressive entails:, calling him *indirectly* ignorant of your (the groups) rules, acting in an elitist and authoritarian manner, calling him childish, indirectly threatening him with administrative action and so forth. I repeat, you are a douche.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

642,912,072

== Thank You ) == Hello Jonesey95! ::Thank you for fixing my recent reference citation. ::I am new to Wikipedia but very keen about editing ) ::You can brief me with regard to citation as I am very wiling to learn maximum I can. Thank you:)

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

642,917,846

` :Fixed. Also, since when did we put a bold title of ``Sources``. along with a bunch of book refs at the top of a section? (bizarre...) I moved them to... (drum roll) the sources section at the bottom. I'm sure this article needs more work. - '''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

642,928,893

` ::Since ``hand washing`` is a generic word used for different TYPES of hand washing, and each specific hand washing has its own specific laws on how it should be performed (e.g. with or without a vessel; three intermittent times in the morning and with a vessel in most customs, etc.), the detail of the mitzvah can only be learned in the main body of the article. Customs also differ with different Jewish ethnic groups. I think that ``negel vasser`` and the three pourings is the generally accepted practice in the morning (in most Jewish homes), although the kabbalists add a fourth pouring. This, as noted, is explained in the body of the main article. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

642,938,236

` == ==The SPÖ in Mein Kampf == At one moment Hitler lauded the Social Democratic Party in his mind (Friedrich Austerlitz, Anton David, Viktor Adler and Wilhelm Ellenbogen are mentioned by their last names on p. 66 of Mein Kampf) for championing ``das allgemeine und geheime Wahlrecht`` (Mein Kampf, p. 39) or universal suffrage, saying to himself that this must lead to a weakening of the so-hated-by-him Habsburg monarchic rule. When he later saw more of what the party was about however, he suggested its members were being servile to the Slavs to the point of debasing themselves, as one who is utterly mendicant, whilst disfavoring the Germans in an attempt to save the multiethnic melting pot of Austria-Hungary. It appears he was angered that he was asked to join the trade union and that men of Jewish heritage were influential in the party (Mein Kampf, pgs. 39, 40, 65 and 66).Mein Kampf, Erster Band, 2. Kapitel `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

642,938,698

` == Disparity between Traditional Jewish Dates and Academic Dates == , I will desist from making edits in this current article, since I feel my input might be misconstrued or disruptive, and that, of course, would not be my intent. However, please be apprised that there is a vast disparity between the traditional Jewish method of calibrating years based on a carefully guarded oral tradition, as opposed to modern methods used primarily by Christians who rely heavily upon the modern academic methods applied in dating chronology. The two are still reconcilable, but it will take a vast amount of effort and a person of ``long wind`` (patience) and extreme diligence to even begin to explain where the discrepancies have ``crept-in`` to ancient chronologies. The Jews insist that there were only 210 years of slavery in Egypt, although the 430 years mentioned in the Hebrew Bible are merely counted from the time of Isaac's birth, until the departure of Israel from Egypt. You see, ``strangers in a land not theirs,`` really begins with Abraham's seed in the land of Canaan. Anyway, my view is not to interrupt your work, but to let it proceed on course. I would, however, have preferred to see you mention more about the ``other method`` practiced by mainstream Judaism, whether it is accepted or not by Christian or academic circles. This would have given more balance to the current article. I have an inkling that someone will eventually start another article dealing only the Jewish tradition of biblical chronology. If I might say, for us, the Scroll of Antiochus is considered a reliable source. CERTAIN FLAWS WITH MODERN SCHOLARSHIP: I wish to point out something about modern scholarship that I think we should be aware of. Research has been carried out in France by a certain Christian Robin and André Lemaire on the subject of the Queen of Sheba and King Solomon. André Lemaire wrote: “The hypothesis of a Sheba in Northern Arabia at the beginning of the 1st millennium BCE (Noth 1968: 223-224; Würthwein 1977: 121; Eph‘al 21984: 88-89, 227-229; Garbini 1984; Sarkiö 1994:190; Mulder 1998: 509-510) has no basis and is generally abandoned (Robin 1992: col. 1109-1110, 1118; Avanzini 1996: 13; Kitchen 1997b: 128.” He also writes: “The first mention of Sheba in Neo-Assyrian texts is to be dated mid-8th c. BCE with the story of a caravan of 200 camels coming from Tayma and Sheba to Hindanu (Middle-Euphrates) (Cavigneaux – Ismaïl 1990: 339-357; Frame 1995: 300; Younger 2003: 279-282; Holladay 2006: 319-321).” Contrary to modern scholarship, it should be noted here that, in Jewish tradition, king Solomon did not begin his reign in circa 1,000 BCE, as purported by modern scholarship, but rather in circa 843 BCE, as we find in Jewish tradition. Likewise, in Jewish tradition, the first Temple was destroyed in 422 BCE, rather than in the erroneous date used by scholars of the western world to fix its destruction, i.e. in 586 BCE. Modern scholars totally ignore Jewish tradition and wrongly put historical events at least 200 years earlier, which accounts for the discrepancies in calibrating these important events and not finding historical records to substantiate these events. The one major flaw in their critical view of Jewish texts is the belief that if they cannot find an archaeological document affirming a certain event mentioned in the Bible, for them it is as though the event never happened. This is a fallacy in logic. To begin to tackle this tremendous difficulty with modern scholarship and Jewish tradition, we must first lay down a premise that will follow us all throughout this discussion, and that is the fact that historical records have been kept by Jews since ancient times, and they have often preserved these very written accounts of events by marking their dates in the Seleucid Era counting. This is vital, as without which information, it will be virtually impossible to determine the sequence of events and to correctly compare them with dates in the Julian / Gregorian calendars. The Aramaic ``Scroll of Antiochus,`` known in Hebrew as ``Megillath Benei Hašmonai`` (The Scroll of the Sons of Asamoneus), is a curious document, alleged by Rabbi Saadia Gaon in his Introduction to ``Ha-Eggron`` to have been written by the elders of the schools of Hillel and Shammai in the Chaldaic language, meaning, a document that dates back earlier than the book Seder Olam, composed by Rabbi Yose b. Halpetha in the 2nd century CE. In that book, the ``Scroll of Antiochus,`` we find this remarkable remark, viz., that ``from the Second Temple's rebuilding till the 23rd year of the reign of Antiochus Eupator, son of Antiochus Epiphanes, who invaded Judaea, there had transpired 213 years in total.`` בִּשׁנַת עַסרִין וּתלָת שְׁנִין לְמִמלְכֵיהּ, ב

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

642,939,140

` == Only in Wikipepedia == Only here will you find the types of administrators who will allow questions and comments to be posted but block a user from answering them. Yep, Bbb23 or as we like to call you, , thats's pointed at you. Of course as administrators go your about average, and being average around here is nothing to talk about! Like you really think you can block me! What a friggin joke homie, you don't have half the brains at this as I do. Hey Bbb 4 brains, you messed with my parents and my friends too and now we're going to mess with you and your little boyfriend . And for our favorite Pin Head , Ah huh you Didja know over achieving and butt kissing all over this just is a way to make up for you lack else where? Try the real world, because your time on here is limited. Hey Bbb butt head, try it too. Keep looking back because you can't block everyone and at any time 1-1000 are just waiting to have their fun. You chould have talked to my parents, but no just act like they know every little thing about the rules here and treat them like old hands here. You needed to show your power here so you messed with them and even when I sent you a note, you extended the blocked on my dad's account for supposed Block EvasionDon't you read?? It was from me!. The more I and my friends see, it's you and your types, that will keep Wikipedia the 2nd rate, online, circle jerking, half true/half BS, so called ``encyclopedia`` that it has been, is today and will always be. Real editors don't fight over this silly poop, nonconstructive editing, better all it means is I want my name there and lets not forget to add all those GAs and FAs that you've worked on right on your User page. This isn't Facebook, if that's your thing you two go there!`

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

642,940,143

` :LoL, ``We don't want to hear?`` Elitist Douche who obviously has a disdain for us IP-editors to add to your disgraceful manner, I for one have found Jacks comments very insightful and interesting so I appreciate them and Maxis too. I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which is detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us. Also, frankly, you're the one being passive aggressive. If you're going to give your opinion about someone, or even insult them, don't beat around the bush. You're the one being exactly what passive aggressive entails:, calling him *indirectly* ignorant of your (the groups) rules, acting in an elitist and authoritarian manner, calling him childish, indirectly threatening him with administrative action and so forth. I repeat, you are a douche. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

642,940,854

Hello, considering Europe a continent, I believe is done by human convention, not by a definition of a large continuous land mass which is the continent of Eurasia. jcardazzi

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,941,087

` == Greek club stats == Somebody please provide a reliable source for his 2014/15 stats, and stop using SOCCERWAY.com as ``support``, this site says ``?/?`` for this seasons, ``15 games/one goal`` for 2013/14. So, per some ``additions``, he scored 20 goals in 30 games in the FIRST HALF of this season, to total the 45/21 that have been inserted and re-inserted? Quite impossible no? `

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

642,948,128

` : I think you misunderstood. I didn't tag the File:Colorado Buffaloes alternate logo.gif, but I did tag the File:Colorado Buffaloes alternate logo.png file. The GIF version looks better than the PNG version, so I swapped it out and that left the PNG version unused. Therefore, it is orphaned. ' ''''' `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

642,948,433

:Re fungi: yes, that's what the paragraph above the list of 4 kingdoms explains, if you read it. The 4 kingdoms are a summary of that paragraph, so fungi should be listed as a separate kingdom.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

642,953,273

Wikipedia page for Michael Reich January 17, 2015 I have just discovered that someone named Michael Saltsman has entered incorrect and offensive information on my Wikipedia page. Saltsman is a well-known virulent opponent of minimum wage increases who works for the National Restaurant Association's Employment Policies Institute. He often trades in character slander as he is not competent to judge professional economic research. I am a labor economist at the University of California, Berkeley, with many published research articles on minimum wage effects. I would like to remove the information that is incorrect and/or offensive. I tried to do so but the changes were reversed. Please tell me how to make these changes. Michael Reich Professor, University of California, Berkeley

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

642,966,287

::::I do, but for single player things. Wikipedia is the closest I come to online interaction. 22:17, January 17, 2015 (UTC)

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

643,000,273

`: ``tremendous lengths to research``...? LOL! Anyway, Americans like to go with what sounds better. (I bet you loved it when they referred to the Picts as ``Woads`` in the 2004 film King Arthur)). It's Hollywood, get over it. - '''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

643,030,283

` == Naploeon vs. Napoleon Epic Rap Battle == This is mentioned, if not in this particular video, in another one (it's actually Hitler vs Darth Vader now that i'm remembering it). by Epic Rap Battles of History. Will add later. '''''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

643,030,819

` ::::::::: Not quite. The first step is to figure out how copyright and free licensing works. :::::::::For the most part, every creative work that anyone creates (in the U.S. and most other countries) is automatically copyrighted. This can include artwork, graphics, music, etc. Copyright means what it sounds like - the ``right to copy``, and that lies with the author of the image. :::::::::Now, you can't simply use another person's copyrighted work without their permission (sure, you can put together a graphic and post it on reddit and nothing will likely happen - we're talking from a technical and legal point of view, though). If I make a painting, and you take that painting and stick it on a shirt and sell it without my permission, I could potentially take you to court. :::::::::There is an exception to this, called ``fair use`` in the United States (and ``fair dealing`` in some other places). Since Wikimedia is based in the U.S., we'll look at it from a U.S. perspective: fair usage allows you to use a copyrighted work, without permission, with the following factors taken into consideration: ::::::::: * The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes ::::::::: * The nature of the copyrighted work ::::::::: * The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole ::::::::: * The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work :::::::::It's a case by case basis, but fair use allows, for example, Wikipedia to display short samples of songs in its articles, or a low-resolution picture of Mario in the Mario article, all without permission. But fair use is a whole other topic - back to copyright. :::::::::This is where the free license movement and the Creative Commons step in. The Creative Commons are a suite of licenses that allow authors to license their works in a way that allow anyone to use them, as long as the original author is attributed. There are other optional limitations, such as not allowing people to use your work for commercial purposes, or requiring anyone that uses your work to license their derivative under a similar license. The Wikimedia Commons is a host of free media, for anyone to use for any purpose (including commercial). This ``free license movement`` has lead to hundreds of millions of works being made available for all to use freely, often for educational purposes. For example, I myself have seen a couple of my freely licensed images appear in news articles or educational publications - it's a nice thing to contribute to. :::::::::So, this hopefully answers your question about whether or not you can create a work for the Commons that is composed of other images. You can, as long as the images you are using are also freely licensed. Remember, the point of free licenses is the let people to use works for their own purposes without seeking permission. If the images are copyrighted (or show no sign of free licensing), you don't have the right to copy the work to use in your own work. And yes, you should cite the sources of all the works that go into your own, even if they're in the public domain - claiming them as your own work is plagiarism. I know this is a lot to hit you with, and it is a broad overview, so feel free to ask for clarification or more details. ~'''' Contribs `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

643,037,809

` :Thanx for the note. Very often editors change my work without explanation. Right now I am dealing with another page for which an editor simply reversed work I spent at least half an hour on. No word of explanation. As for the lists, numbering the species has the advantage of showing you unambiguously how many species there are in the genus. I have seen many pages which begin ``This is a genus of 30-40 species`` followed by a list of 53, or whatever. The estimates are frequently way off the mark and subject to change. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

643,042,310

==recent deleatist vandalization== dear extreemist. Your recent jabber on extreemist groups gave no indication why you were deleating ligitimate links from the see also freedom fighters and opression. Younappear to be promulgating terror by depriving the world of forums to work out differences and ideas. Please stop yout jewish hate. (pastdr ban text here but server deleted it)). You are cowards and dishonest.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

643,042,433

== Bongwarrior == My dearest Bongwarrior, How the fuck are you allowed to edit anything on this site with a name like Bongwarrior, How? Honestly, how? Yours sincerely, Garfunkel Felchmaster.

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

643,059,406

` :::The hypocrisy of Bishonen. It is ironic when this poor excuse for a human being and an admin Bishonen says something like ``it's a sad, even heart-breaking, case that we need to approach with gentleness``. This Attila the Hun lookalike is the farthest thing from anything that spells gentleness. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

643,072,117

Wikipedia is not the place to spread unsubstantiated criminal accusations. Please exercise caution in the future.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,076,448

== Greetings == Hi, Cirt - I hope you will consider stopping accusing me of bad faith editing. If you have any qualms with particular edits, I'd love to hear what is wrong with them and how my approach can be improved. I'd like to direct your attention to two quotes on user pages. The first is from Jimmy Wales: :== You can edit this page! == :Really, you can! If you would like to, please feel free to do so. Make an edit – or even several! After all, that is what Wikipedia is all about.'' And the second is from Neelix's user page: :Wikipedia is thoroughly, inherently collaborative. In the humanities division of academia, we still hold to the ideal of the lone genius, expecting that each humanities scholar be the sole author of his or her journal articles. In the sciences and social sciences, we expect that there be two or three authors for each journal article. On Wikipedia, every well-developed article has many more than three authors. The result is an ever-increasingly accurate approximation of objectivity. This objectivity is not the pseudo-objectivity that results from ignoring our biases as authors, but is rather the result of diverse perspectives all being covered proportionally through discussion between people who have those diverse perspectives. We write better when we write together. I think those principles are pretty neat. And I am certain my editing adheres to them. If you'd like to contact me off the site, let me know - I'd be happy to share ways to get in touch.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,079,528

== Tag reverts == What's up with the IP that keeps removing the date from the COI tag? ☮ღ☺

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

643,083,099

== Dispute notice == Hi, Cirt. I've started a discussion on the dispute resolution noticeboard about this monring's activity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,083,461

== Directly repeated information in the lead and body == Please stop undoing my edits of the lead and rest of the article wholesale. There are a number of directly repeated phrases in the lead - text that appears verbatim later on in the article. There is no reason the same text should be repeated multiple times.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

643,087,656

==Unified accounts== Thanks for your message, but I have forgotten the usernames and passwords of the DE and NL accunts I made and of the wikimedia commons account. Is there any way in which I can retrieve them? Thank you in advance

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,124,676

To respond to your assertion that what I posted what irrelevant, the SPÖ to this day wields a great deal of influence over the ÖGB.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,126,713

`On p. 43 of Murphy's translationhttps://ia801807.us.archive.org/26/items/MeinKampfEnglish/mein-kampf-english.pdf of Mein Kampf, Hitler declares: ``Then a day came when the more redoubtable of my adversaries resorted to the most effective weapon they had to replace the force of reason. This was intimidation and physical force. Some of the leaders among my adversaries ordered me to leave the building or else get flung down from the scaffolding.`` `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,126,985

(Chapter II, Volume I)

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,130,217

` You did not have to retract your vote on the Liberty photo.. :`

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

643,130,278

As to dates, when there are birth–death parentheticals: Petrarch (1304–1374) is used not (1304–74) for an infobox, the style then can be used throughout the infobox in order to maintain consistency in styles.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

643,136,506

== Still working on the English comparison of road signs == Are you working on the English comparison of road signs now?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,140,796

did a grammar and punctuation cleanup, primarily on the Occurence in nature section. I'm not an expert on the subject. Large sections of the article have no or minimal inline citations, so I added the refimprove tag. ~

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

643,149,595

` == Edits == Hello, thank you for letting me know about your changes, I briefly looked over the article I changed (technically changed back) and was unaware of any errors, The reason I made the changes was due to me looking at another article, and noticing the user named ``Lukeno94`` making an incorrect edit, so I found my way to his page of edits, and it seemed he was targeting a specific IP address and changing anything that person edited. I apologize if I made an error, I was simply trying to help out what looked like someone being bullied.`

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

643,154,338

:thanks so much! truly appreciate it and excited to continue contributing.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

643,160,023

===Solution based on intersection of at least four spheres, not TDOA and not Multilateration=== Position is based on the intersection of four or more spheres. See the navigation equations. These equations describe spheres. The solution has nothing to do with hyperboloids or multilateration.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

643,176,769

a , please improve Typhoon Mekkhala's page because i'm created the page, for shortly knownly as Mekkhala. 16:46, 19 January 2015

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

643,188,751

`== edit request == Under the section Head coaching record it says ``The 112 wins were returned to Joe Paterno on January 16, 2015 as a part of a settlement between the NCAA and Penn State. Those 112 wins make Paterno the most victorious coach of all time in NCAA football with a total of 409 wins``. John Gagliardi has 489 wins. The most in NCAA football. Please edit the page so it reads ``The 112 wins were returned to Joe Paterno on January 16, 2015 as a part of a settlement between the NCAA and Penn State. Those 112 wins make Paterno the most victorious coach of all time in FBS NCAA football with a total of 409 wins``. Thanks `

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

643,189,218

See page 48 of the Freeh report for Freeh's explanation of what news articles are trying to explain. http://progress.psu.edu/assets/content/REPORT_FINAL_071212.pdf

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

643,189,348

yeah, i'm got one facebook too, but it's my second account, go and link me:https://www.facebook.com/votestralightcouncilorkinlargadas?fref=ts. and you not known just i'm changing the utc time for mekkhala? i'm link this for utc time.:http://www.typhoon2000.ph/ and for emergencies, i link this. but this is mekkhala!:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/01W/imagery/rgb-animated.gif

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

643,190,749

This is not season 5. History's own webpage (which is correct - you cannot argue against the people who make it) says these new episodes are part of season 4. On iTunes it shows that these new episodes are season 5 but this is wrong. For a while, History's own webpage had these episodes down as season 5 but reverted it a couple of weeks in to the series. Also, look at the 'Complete Series 4' Top Gear USA DVD. It was released in December of last year and contains these episodes that we are discussing along with the ten we can both agree were in series 4. SERIES 5 HAS NOT BEEN MADE YET.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

643,194,191

` ==Sockpuppet investigation== `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

643,195,373

I only removed some, to correctly add a title section

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

643,210,772

== Beginnings == In 1975, Sakamoto released an album with Toshiyuki Tsuchitori entitled Disappointment-Hateruma which is not mentioned in the article.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

643,217,250

:Because it was incoherent and promotional.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

643,220,663

. :: As a daily NC headphones user I'd say it is likely that they are healthier than regular phones since there's a tendency not to raise the volume so high with them

2,015

false

article

random

train

false