dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
643,990,504	== Stop == Stop spamming my page. Least of all with rubbish templates droning on about some non existent safety risk. No reply or response is needed.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
643,991,342	== Ok enough == I have four twinkle generated warnings on my page, all from you. Yet you talk about me harassing people with a jokey, totally unserious message on one persons page. Carry on, and I WILL report you for harassment, misuse of automated tools - which will bring your use of rollback to an end, assumption of bad faith, and what I perceive to be a misuse of your user space. Please, leave me alone.	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
643,992,918	None. This is a massive abuse of the blocking system, and a huge overreaction to something so unbelievably minor. I also feel being labelled a vandal is both a personal attack and a breach of AGF - given that I have not vandalised anything	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
643,994,201	You know what? No, I'm not just gonna sit here and take it, because this is wrong, and you are abusing your privileges. First of all, it is not possible to vandalise your own userspace. Find me the section of any policy to the contrary. Secondly, it is not possible to harass people with singular, jokey, and clearly not serious messages. Find me the section of any policy to the contrary. You can't. You have blocked me for things that I have not done, and have acted in a completely inappropriate manner.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
643,995,442	You want to have a little read of wp:AGF, but don't worry, because that is a bridge we will cross in good time.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
643,995,637	I will ensure that your troubling behaviour and attitude is both reported and looked into.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
644,010,168	I've been using Wikipedia on and off for 10 years...	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
644,010,853	You should know how to wp:agf. For tildes...	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
644,016,060	By the way, User:Cplakidas you will get blocked if you continiue speaking that way. Read the article, Wikipedia:Civility.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,020,833	the USGS page, it is not free. AFAIK, it must at least be marked as a verbatim copy or citation. Any other meanings? 14:51, 12 November 2009	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
644,028,322	: The truncations are real, but we need sources there too for terminology. Quasitruncation comes from Johnson at least.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,035,318	` :Sandy, I refuse to be drawn into article/talk page drama and accusations. I am working toward getting consensus, you are just reverting when there's a discussion already in progress. ● `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,036,846	== Urgent Help Needed. == Please stop RovingPersonalityConstruct !! He keep removing Sourced content on several Wikipedia pages such as: 093, JL-2, J-20. Please stop him by blocking him or protecting the pages. Thank you.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
644,036,996	Urgent Help Needed == Please stop RovingPersonalityConstruct !! He keep removing Sourced content on several Wikipedia pages such as: Type 093 submarine, JL-2, J-20. Please stop him by blocking him or protecting the pages. Thank you. ==	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
644,037,072	== Urgent Help Needed == Please stop RovingPersonalityConstruct !! He keep removing Sourced content on several Wikipedia pages such as: Type 093 submarine, JL-2, J-20. Please stop him by blocking him or protecting the pages. Thank you.	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
644,038,117	I have reported you for several admins for edit warring and removing sourced contents ! Since talking to you is of no use, I have decided to take this to the admins. You have no rights to determine weather a source is reaiable or not !! Be gone !	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
644,054,073	` : Name one time where I have ignored them. Show me right now, give me a link. I have replied to all of your accusations, and I have countered all of your false claims effectively. You are seriously embarrassing yourself. Do you seriously expect me to believe that some random individual is denying all of my claims backed up by evidence. Then this same individual tells you that instead of relying on facts, you have to get more people to agree with you on the talk page, which I did. Then when you ask this same individual why there are have been no changes to the page since they have managed to get more people to agree with them, and the individual replies with the statement of ``the consensus is biased as the proposal.`` Now do you seriously want me to believe that after all of that you are not either 1. Biased/Prejudice 2. Taking Orders from another person 3. Being Paid to do so If you seriously want me to believe that you do not apply to any of those categories and you are just a regular person with an ordinary life who just happenes to ``disagree`` with me then you are insane.`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
644,054,345	Do you think I actually have something to do with when the IP changes. Thats also been discussed, This is no Vandalism. This is an IP page. I have no control when it changes. See maShaunix talk page we just discussed this like last night. Stop vandalizing the page. Stop removing better grammar for worse.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
644,059,511	` :This is just antifeminist posturing in the guise of NPOV. Because scholarship is feminist does not make it unreliable. Scholarship does not need to be neutral either, nor do sources. Our language on WP does, however. And it accurately reflects the sources. Please {{re}} `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,086,584	== Um... == My edit was cited, dumbass. Did you even listen to the source before reverting?	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
644,114,152	== Contested deletion == This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) Hello, I am trying to make a wikipedia page for upcoming international women's sport events. Can you tell me what I am doing wrong?	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,118,453	the list I suggested would	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
644,123,812	` I don't know if the argument ``The only widely hypothesized type of object that can contain 4.1 million solar masses in a volume that small is a black hole`` makes sense after this correction. `	2,015	false	user	random	test	false
644,152,011	`Lt. Willemoes on ``Flådebatteri No. 1`` Copenhagen 1801`	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
644,165,635	And your point is...? It's just an image. Who cares about which one you think is better? This isn't your site. Nobody cares if you used to work for the Transit Authority. All that nonsensical vandalism just for a damn image? Oh wow. Get over it and move on with your life. It's not that serious.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,167,679	` ==Facebook== Some 107 people ``liked`` this article on Facebook. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,180,354	:Thank you so much! You are very kind. )	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,186,309	::::::Do you think I was detailed enough? Anything more I should include?	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
644,218,722	== Thanks dude! == Yes,we both were right,coz i knew that Meshuggah might release the album on 26th September,2014 but you got hold of the good news and updated my post...Good to see two metalheads help each other..\m/!	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
644,236,421	== Re:Debito Arudou == Hey, I noticed your most recent comment on the Debito Arudou talk page. Thank you for agreeing with me, but I wonder about how constructive it is to repeat the point when Dr. Arudou has already read my initial response and chose for one reason or another not to acknowledge that point. I can tell you and I would probably agree on a lot of points in the real world, but I'd suggest branching out your editing a bit, since it does look a little suspicious when all of your edits are in a single area (read WP:SPA). I like to edit articles related to Japanese literature, but if I only edited in that area other users would likely get suspicious that I'm not really interested in contributing constructively to building an encyclopedia. This is NOT an imputation of your good faith (again, I seem to agree with you on these issues), just a piece of friendly advice. (BTW, if he compares himself to Rosa Parks on this site again, I'm not telling you not to respond then.) ()	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,237,529	::They do - and it usually doesn't work. Their PR depts sometimes have bright ideas, and find themselves very quickly reverted... But most of the articles about big companies are really not by them. A Wikipedia article is a drop in the ocean to them, and sometimes a thorn in the flesh as well (if something they'd rather everyone forgot about is in there...).	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,239,121	REDIRECT Talk:Serpong railway station	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,245,999	` :Neutral, but support move to ``Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham``: It combines all the three major advantages you list. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,251,053	== lost love spell caster +918130636190 == Anyone can contact with me for their problem. I do work specially for poor and needy people which really troubling their life. If you are finding a true and helpful one so don't go anywhere just contact with me by phone line or e-mail. I always ready to solve your problems. Jai Shri Hari. contact:- 8130636190 hnarayan325@gmail.com	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
644,268,139	i think this is some times fake so if you can prove it would be a lot of help to some of us kids who look to this site four help so pleas proof read this stuf that is put on here tanks	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
644,275,239	` :::I'm as baffled as you. / `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,289,046	` ==Blatant editorializing== DVdm, what specific statement have I made that you consider blatant editorializing? I really have no idea what I did that could be considered blatant editorializing. I said, ``The reader should note the equations to be solved are not the equations for a hyperboloid discussed above:``. Do you consider this statement to be blatant editorializing? Now the reason I said this is because the discussion of hyperbolas and hyperboloids could easily mislead the reader. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
644,294,098	` :::::::::: I suggest you re-read the rpoosal. (Pigsonthewing); ; `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
644,300,532	` ==GPS Removed contrarian remark, You removed important material from the GPS Article== , you have removed important material from the article section, ``Problem Description``. You removed a statement that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola. Rather than state what you had done, you gave the vague description, removed contrarian remark. This was a terrible edit on your part because not only is it absolute truth that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola, it is extremely important that the readers be told this fact. The reason for this is because there is much discussion relating to hyperbolas in the section which is quite likely to mislead the reader into believing that the equations to be solved are equations for a hyperbola. The fact that you only say, removed contrarian remark, indicates that you were very superficial in your thinking. It is therefore concluded that we do need a statement alerting readers to the fact that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
644,316,246	The amount of salt is staggering. It rivals Wookieepedia's freakout over the canon reset.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
644,321,299	, 26 January 2015 (UTC)\|decline=You're blocked for not being here to contribute to the encyclopedia, and judging by your contributions, 153 edits with precisely two to the encyclopedia, the block seems correct. 23:01	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
644,324,593	Oh, please. I was just trying to add the No equestrains sign to the Comparison. But you won't stop. BTW, Can you improve Comparison of African Traffic Signs, Fry1989?	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
644,345,006	:I think. I am not sure about the sharpness. But is much-much better on photos than I am.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,352,221	REDIRECT Talk:HMS Stalker (L3515)	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,354,026	` :: So I need to get every editor who has ever edited the article to agree with any change I want to make or you will revert it? Okay. I had assumed that anyone who actually cared about it would have it on their watch list and have responded sometime in the last 5 weeks to the original discussion, which so far is unanimous in rejecting the label ``alternate present``. So, how many months do I need to wait? If you actually have an opinion on the merits of the edit, other than who made it, why not discuss it at the article? I have no idea what you mean by ``what is has been marketed as``. When was it ever marketed as ``alternate present``? There is no citation for that label. It's just what one editor sometime ago wrote. Let him defend it if he cares. `	2,015	false	user	random	test	false
644,372,656	` :::Sorry. This discussion isn't about improving some sentence. It is about reporting what the document Homosexualitatis problema says. As you stated at the beginning, ``The document clearly says 'In fact, circumstances may exist, or may have existed in the past, which would reduce or remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance; or other circumstances may increase it. What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable.' Quote the document directly. Add reliable and notable opinions.`` :::The document mentions ``deliberate choice`` only in relation to the origin of homosexual orientation. It says nothing of deliberate choice in relation to homosexual behaviour. It says nothing about any particular ``when ...`` circumstances that make behaviour a deliberate choice. It just says that the sexual behaviour of homosexuals is not always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. :::We all make many choices that are not deliberate choices, we make many choices without reflection, without even adverting to the fact of making a choice. The culpability or merit of our choices varies not only according to the gravity of the matter, but also according to the deliberateness of our choices. According as a choice is more, or less, or not at all deliberate, the culpability or merit is greater, or less, or null. You say: ``When it isn't compulsive, it is a result of choice.`` To the extent that behaviour is not compulsive, to that extent behaviour is a result of choice, a choice that may be to a greater or less extent or not at all deliberate and thus culpable or meritorious. The extent of compulsion can vary. If it is total, then there is no choice, deliberate or not, and there is no culpability or merit. If it is not total, the freedom of choice is to that extent limited, but the culpability or merit can still be greater, less, or null. What the document says is that the sexual behaviour of homosexuals is not always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. The document does not exclude the view that their sexual behaviour is sometimes totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. The document also does not exclude the view that their sexual behaviour is always partially compulsive and therefore less than totally culpable. :::The document does not say: ``When homosexual activity is the result of deliberate choice, it is not made inculpable by natural sexual orientation.`` At best, that is an original-research conclusion from what it says. :::The document says: ``It has been argued that the homosexual orientation in certain cases is not the result of deliberate choice``. The secondary source that illustrates what the document says of the homosexual tendency by using the analogy of kleptomania says ``no one makes himself a kleptomaniac, and no one really wants to be one``. The document says ``circumstances may exist, or may have existed in the past, which would reduce or remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance; or other circumstances may increase it. What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable.`` The secondary source illustrates what the document says: ``the more compulsive the disorder, the more reduced is the moral culpability for one's actions. Yet we would never say that kleptomaniacs should be allowed to steal at will``. :::What is wrong with the following summaries of what Homosexualitatis problema says on the question, all of which Roscelese has rejected? :::``The letter said that circumstances can reduce or remove an individual's culpability and can also increase it, but that homosexual sexual activity is not always and completely compulsive for homosexual persons.`` :::``Circumstances, the letter said, can diminish or eliminate an individual's culpability, and can also augment it, but it rejected the idea that homosexual activity is always totally compulsive and therefore inculpable for a homosexual person.`` :::``The letter rejects the idea that homosexual activity is always totally compulsive and therefore inculpable for a homosexual person, while also stating that circumstances can diminish or eliminate or also augment an individual's culpability.`` :::Are these not far more faithful to what the document actually says than the meandering original-research ``The letter said that, when homosexual activity is the result of deliberate choice, it is not made inculpable by natural sexual orientation, contradicting the idea that natural orientation rendered it totally inculpable``?`	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
644,379,297	`:The lead currently states ``Making out is an euphemism of American origin, dating back to at least 1949, and is used synonymously with the terms kissing, petting and necking, but may also refer to non-penetrative sex acts such as heavy petting. Snogging is a term with roughly the same meaning in British English and related varieties of English.`` What more is needed to explain what petting is? In the romantic/sexual sense, it's an alternative word for making out. And heavy petting redirects to the Non-penetrative sex article, and is explained there. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
644,381,477	== Swedish intercepts used by NSA/GCHQ. == Although Stockholm decrypts are mentioned in the Venona project article I cannot see that the ca 3600 telegrams intercepted by FRA in Sweden are mentioned. These were given to GCHQ in 1960 and were very important in the continuation of the project. About 390 of these telegrams were subsequently decrypted, partly only in most instances. The book 'Venona', 2003, ISBN 91-89442-84-9 is an excellent account of the Swedish angle to Venona.	2,015	false	article	random	dev	false
644,385,906	for this page to stay online	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,474,641	::::The persecutions we're talking about take place in Jerusalem and in the rest of Israel, so it's suitable to add this kind of information in this article. It is also suitable to speak about persecutions as it appears to be unilateral attacks from a religious majority against a religious minority, unless you have source that shows recurring Christian violence against the Jewish majority... I notice that you've restored your version without valid arguments and before the end of the discussion on the talk page which is uncivil and contrary to Wikipedia's rules. Please, stop removing well documented informations or you will be reported.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,476,592	== I like this article == This article is beautifully neutral and it conveys the topic at hand very well. Heh, just wanted to say something. This article is like a diamond in the rough. It's pretty reassuring seeing something nice amidst so much bad. Good Job.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
644,477,899	` ::::Oh, so that's a grand total of no valid points to make now that your entire point for reverting has been proven to be moot? As I already explained if you would actually have used your comprehension skills (if they even exist), I based it on WWE's own advertising of the event via posters and DVD covers, this is not original research. This is literally what a main event is, seeing as you seemingly aren't aware that ``main event`` does not equal ``last match``. And nice irrelevant referencing of numerous misunderstandings, good use of your time was it? Last warning to revert before you are reported for edit warring, btw. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,479,487	::::::You have repeatedly failed miserably to read, you have repeatedly failed to heed warnings, and you then resorted to completely irrelevant character assassination once you were proven wrong. Explain, please, why anybody should collaborate with you?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,499,466	` == Centric episode(s) == A discussion regarding the meaning and value of listing ``Centric episode(s)`` in the character infobox has been started at Talk:The Walking Dead (TV series)#Character page infoboxes - ``Centric episode(s)``. Please feel free to join discussion if interested. Thanks in advance. - `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
644,508,123	In modern elevators, the stop button is replaced with a key switch, to prevent misuse. Older elevators had stop buttons, although many have had the stop button replaced with a key switch.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
644,509,981	Your chart makes no sense, you realize that, and you're making up nonsense excuses just because don't want to admit that the original is better.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,534,150	== Huggle message == Hey Oliverlyc! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/ Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest. Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks!	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
644,541,711	Comment: While I am still fairly opposed to merging GSL into an existing article that deals with gun politics, I would like to state that Firearm Owners Protection Act seems like a more appropriate choice, given the volumes of information provided by a majority of our sources and citations that infer it as the key source of GSL by both sides of the issue.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,547,103	yes. 20:66 PH Standard Time, 28 January 2015 (UTC)	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
644,549,410	*Your opinion, and you know what they say about opinions.... and timings of what? The fact that I happened to agree with someone too soon makes me automatically guilty? What an asinine proposition, coming from someone I was not even talking to. The jackassery abounds.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
644,553,255	*Should be fine. Done. —	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,564,557	== Internazionale == Which club do you support ?	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
644,587,565	You're very foolish you know that - right if you want confirmation just visit the official FC Internazionale Milano webpage for news of his signing! Are you daft? He has already been issued with a number (77) at Inter.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
644,598,453	The cause of antisemitic is not neutral at all and misleading and even false. it is true that jews control the media and the banks, do I really have to give you all the name? I can but I won't because wikipedia is . . . jew owned and so biased about it and I will be erased. I just want to tell you guys here that you piece of shit.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
644,599,125	` == Official website? == This site has been added as the ``official`` Randy Rhoads website but it's official status cannot be verified. Any website can claim to be official but this one seems like a mere fan network. Can anyone confirm that this site is official in any way? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,601,641	: I am deleting the notability tag. For whatever issues there may or may not be with the article itself, in the CG world, he is notable enough.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,611,521	Update...It is kelseymar	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,624,941	:: OK, I suppose that's good enough.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,634,068	Going to have to quick fail this. A llllloooooooot of MoS errors (MOS:CAPS, MOS:DASH, WP:ITAL to name a few), prose issues (weasel words aplenty), and a lack of in-text attribution for the analysis. has been inactive since October 2014, so I doubt these issues are going to get fixed in a timely manner. If any bystanders want to fix these mistakes, I'd highly recommend giving it a copy edit or, better yet, requesting one at the Guild of Copy Editors WikiProject page. Thanks.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,636,255	` == On Mohammed Al-Bayati's qualifications == With regards to the edits over the past day, I think that while Mohammed Al-Bayati's qualifications are tangentially relevant, the purpose of the text as they are placed right now is to ``prove`` that Mohammed Al-Bayati is not qualified to review the autopsy report. This I think violates NPOV. If the qualifications are to be included they should come under the ``criticism and controversy`` section, quoted by whoever it is that accused Mohammed Al-Bayati of not being qualified to review the autopsy report is cited. If nobody made the accusations, then this is original synthesis, and should again be removed. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
644,636,397	Can it be reinstated now? I changed the wording.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,643,848	Yes, A very troubling decision, It should have happened years ago	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
644,652,516	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Original Barnstar \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Thank you for your quiet minor contributions. I hope you like it here and edit more often! Cheers! \|}`	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
644,685,902	== Conversion to Islam == There is a mistake. In summer 2014 he converted to Islam. (According to the quoted German articles.)Blum konvertierte zum Islam und fand Halt nach Verletzung Please change it. Thank you in advance	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
644,688,738	Sorry, that was Edwin Welch, actually Edwin James Welch.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
644,699,940	:::It is really troubling when my edits are getting reverted. I do not understand why people are reverting my edits and saying they unconstructive etc. meanwhile I just listed about 10 pages and yet all the flags are still on those pages. I do not understand why you have some sort of fetish with my edits?? Since there are these rules people are mentioning about flags, why are people only taking them seriously on recently added pages, and not on the pages that have been there for some time now?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,700,394	```Just because other stuff doesn't make it write??`` On what grounds? Rules are rules no? If there are flags on other pages, how can people turn a blind eye??? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
644,710,572	Actually no, I couldn't find any verifiable sources for my family page (Why it's so short) so I can understand deletion of that one. The Azzi page, however, I believe is good enough to stay online.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,723,949	` *To many people ``MPV`` is the recording format and the software that writes and plays it, and ``MPV player`` is the handlable electronic device that can play that format. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
644,727,441	:::::I have just researched the how to use the resources of a university that is a short drive from me (thank-you for that idea) and I will be using their resources imminently. I should wait on the HighBeam (thanks for that) as Nikki may have reason to deny my request for access until I can tell her I have exhausted this first idea. I will reply before the weekend is out with an update.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,729,625	You are the biggest idiot I have ever seen. It's not uncredible, your lame brain refuses to believe truth. Unless you can give ME a credible source proving he is a Christian, he's NOT a Christian.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
644,742,454	MusikAnimal is a liar, a disinformant and plague to WP. Please review this disinformants work as he posts nothing but lies on wiki. This website is useless when people like him are ruining it. I will go to major websites and post this. I'm sure my friends at Game Informer and IGN will love to put this in their next issue and on facebook. I will have more views about MusikAnimal than your corrupt wiki pages. I promise	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
644,743,842	` Baer didnt invent video games. This is jewish propaganda supported by a wiki troll named, ``Goldberg`` Go figure. Hey, ``goldberg``, try educating yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfBwz_SiK8s`	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
644,744,155	:::::'Usual argument' here, or more broadly?	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
644,744,214	Alright, your lack of fact checking and denial of truth is pathetic, especially by your staff. Stop making comments, just to harass me. You are assuming I'm everyone who doesn't agree with your wiki article. Pathetic. I will continue to report them until your competent employees do the right thing.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
644,744,505	You cant block me you fucking retard. BRB nigger	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
644,744,617	Personal attacks because you pieces of shit jewniggers change the truth? I'm going to get 100 of my friends to remove mass amounts of pages all week. block that you fucking idiot. WAREZ	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
644,753,851	==Flags== I 100% agree with you User:Alansohn. I only did it because of him, as well as others User:Qed237, User:Meters etc. on Talk:Edmonton (please forward your input to this discussion as I need more support from people with the same opinion to keep flags). They insisted that the flags be taken down especially on Edmonton, Winnipeg, Yellowknife, Iqaluit, Whitehorse, Yukon etc. and threatened me with edit war and blocking violoations for adding flag icons when there is no set in stone rule. Would you mind adding the flags back to these cities, as I do not want to go over the 3RR. Thanks.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,760,325	:::::::I think the undue weight problem can be fixed either way. 1.) Mentioning the Alevi view (in the lead); or 2.) removing the Ahmadi and Bahai views.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,763,744	:::No not really - except for the you know what, but that ye olready promised... . I am happy I found that delightfull girl. Matching the falling guys perfectly.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
644,769,816	Kamen Rider Can you please stop claiming that the changes Darkness made had consensus on the talk page? I'm not sure where people are getting the idea that he undid changes Ryulong had made, the whole idea that this is relevant to Ryulong at all is kinda stupid, because the discussion on the talk page had nothing to do with what Darkness did. I can't vouch for why the admins did what they did, but as far as the animanga wikiproject is concerned, Darkness's edits were inappropriate because they violated the consensus policies on how to romanize names, not because of anything Ryulong was involved in.	2,015	false	user	random	test	false
644,773,944	` == Flag icons == There has been some disputes to have flag icons in the infobox on various cities WP:INFOBOXFLAG states: ``Human geographic articles – for example settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes; however, physical geographic articles – for example, mountains, valleys, rivers, lakes, and swamps – should not. Where a single article covers both human and physical geographic subjects (e.g. Manhattan), or where the status of the territory is subject to a political dispute, the consensus of editors at that article will determine whether flag use in the infobox is preferred or not.`` Meaning that cities, being human geographic articles could potentially be permitted to have flag icons. In addition there are many other articles such as New York City, Moncton, fredericton, Las Vegas, etc. that have flags in the infoboxes. I am interested to see you input. Thanks. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,788,212	:::::::::Ched, either you have misunderstood what has been said or you are addressing another topic altogether; I'm sorry, but I cannot parse your comment.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
644,790,046	::That is a good point you made about its size. The Canadian flag however, is easy recognizable.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
644,805,444	== RECTIFIED? == >>The subsequent insurgency exposed the tanks' vulnerability to rocket-propelled grenades and mines. These problems were partially rectified with the TUSK modification. The Marine Corps sent a company of M1A1 Abrams to Afghanistan in late 2010.<	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
644,831,569	:It was the disdain of the more power-hungry admins for ordinary contributors and the unwillingness of Arbcom (made up, of course, largely of power-hungry admins) to reign them in that made me stop writing stuff for WP. I haven't posted anything under my user name for well over a year now. I have, however, made a few posts to discussions where admin abuse was visible. A certain HJ Mitchell (now where have I seen that user name recently?) blocked me for posting whilst logged out. This, of course, is not a legitimate reason. And someone from the block-first-think-second-but-only-if-you-can-be-bothered school blocked me for being despite my editing from a static IP in a different country from where Vigilant lives. :This site lets people like Mitchell climb the greasy pole through picking on others. (Just look at his activity log and how few of the people he has blocked have blue user talk page links and they aren't all vandals. WP:BITE or what?) Hopefully his plans to get on Arbcom have been pushed back somewhat by this latest escapade.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
644,839,429	` :Started with Sunday Times Rich List, but once all the ``missing`` billionaires from there were on WP, I moved on to Forbes. STRL is printed annually in a magazine format. Think it came out in two parts in 2014 - 11 and 18 May. I have a paper copy of the 18 May part (114 pages). It has details of the top 1,000, with an alphabetical index. All it seems to be missing is the bios of numbers 26-100, instead just the names and net wealth for each. So, I can probably answer any questions. Remeber, STRL is just for Britain and Ireland, but includes foreigners who are deemed to live here. Anything particular I can help on? `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
644,844,910	REDIRECT Talk:Jack Edwards (British politician)	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
644,852,058	== Edit warring == is adding unsourced information to the article, information which is undue (view of one person), and information from the Daily Telegraph which need to be handled carefully as that newspaper is campaigning for the Bill. \|\|	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
644,873,051	:::::::::::I have not, to date, been provided with any evidence that any creditable historian would support the current article's jewish bias, something which I have reason to believe even Zionists would themselves repudiate. Please explain your last remark, bearing in mind that this this is not a tutorial in some second rate colonial university.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false

643,990,504

== Stop == Stop spamming my page. Least of all with rubbish templates droning on about some non existent safety risk. No reply or response is needed.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

643,991,342

== Ok enough == I have four twinkle generated warnings on my page, all from you. Yet you talk about me harassing people with a jokey, totally unserious message on one persons page. Carry on, and I WILL report you for harassment, misuse of automated tools - which will bring your use of rollback to an end, assumption of bad faith, and what I perceive to be a misuse of your user space. Please, leave me alone.

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

643,992,918

None. This is a massive abuse of the blocking system, and a huge overreaction to something so unbelievably minor. I also feel being labelled a vandal is both a personal attack and a breach of AGF - given that I have not vandalised anything

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

643,994,201

You know what? No, I'm not just gonna sit here and take it, because this is wrong, and you are abusing your privileges. First of all, it is not possible to vandalise your own userspace. Find me the section of any policy to the contrary. Secondly, it is not possible to harass people with singular, jokey, and clearly not serious messages. Find me the section of any policy to the contrary. You can't. You have blocked me for things that I have not done, and have acted in a completely inappropriate manner.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

643,995,442

You want to have a little read of wp:AGF, but don't worry, because that is a bridge we will cross in good time.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

643,995,637

I will ensure that your troubling behaviour and attitude is both reported and looked into.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

644,010,168

I've been using Wikipedia on and off for 10 years...

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

644,010,853

You should know how to wp:agf. For tildes...

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

644,016,060

By the way, User:Cplakidas you will get blocked if you continiue speaking that way. Read the article, Wikipedia:Civility.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,020,833

the USGS page, it is not free. AFAIK, it must at least be marked as a verbatim copy or citation. Any other meanings? 14:51, 12 November 2009

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

644,028,322

: The truncations are real, but we need sources there too for terminology. Quasitruncation comes from Johnson at least.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,035,318

` :Sandy, I refuse to be drawn into article/talk page drama and accusations. I am working toward getting consensus, you are just reverting when there's a discussion already in progress. ● `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,036,846

== Urgent Help Needed. == Please stop RovingPersonalityConstruct !! He keep removing Sourced content on several Wikipedia pages such as: 093, JL-2, J-20. Please stop him by blocking him or protecting the pages. Thank you.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

644,036,996

Urgent Help Needed == Please stop RovingPersonalityConstruct !! He keep removing Sourced content on several Wikipedia pages such as: Type 093 submarine, JL-2, J-20. Please stop him by blocking him or protecting the pages. Thank you. ==

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

644,037,072

== Urgent Help Needed == Please stop RovingPersonalityConstruct !! He keep removing Sourced content on several Wikipedia pages such as: Type 093 submarine, JL-2, J-20. Please stop him by blocking him or protecting the pages. Thank you.

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

644,038,117

I have reported you for several admins for edit warring and removing sourced contents ! Since talking to you is of no use, I have decided to take this to the admins. You have no rights to determine weather a source is reaiable or not !! Be gone !

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

644,054,073

` : Name one time where I have ignored them. Show me right now, give me a link. I have replied to all of your accusations, and I have countered all of your false claims effectively. You are seriously embarrassing yourself. Do you seriously expect me to believe that some random individual is denying all of my claims backed up by evidence. Then this same individual tells you that instead of relying on facts, you have to get more people to agree with you on the talk page, which I did. Then when you ask this same individual why there are have been no changes to the page since they have managed to get more people to agree with them, and the individual replies with the statement of ``the consensus is biased as the proposal.`` Now do you seriously want me to believe that after all of that you are not either 1. Biased/Prejudice 2. Taking Orders from another person 3. Being Paid to do so If you seriously want me to believe that you do not apply to any of those categories and you are just a regular person with an ordinary life who just happenes to ``disagree`` with me then you are insane.`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

644,054,345

Do you think I actually have something to do with when the IP changes. Thats also been discussed, This is no Vandalism. This is an IP page. I have no control when it changes. See maShaunix talk page we just discussed this like last night. Stop vandalizing the page. Stop removing better grammar for worse.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

644,059,511

` :This is just antifeminist posturing in the guise of NPOV. Because scholarship is feminist does not make it unreliable. Scholarship does not need to be neutral either, nor do sources. Our language on WP does, however. And it accurately reflects the sources. Please {{re}} `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,086,584

== Um... == My edit was cited, dumbass. Did you even listen to the source before reverting?

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

644,114,152

== Contested deletion == This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) Hello, I am trying to make a wikipedia page for upcoming international women's sport events. Can you tell me what I am doing wrong?

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,118,453

the list I suggested would

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

644,123,812

` I don't know if the argument ``The only widely hypothesized type of object that can contain 4.1 million solar masses in a volume that small is a black hole`` makes sense after this correction. `

2,015

false

user

random

test

false

644,152,011

`Lt. Willemoes on ``Flådebatteri No. 1`` Copenhagen 1801`

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

644,165,635

And your point is...? It's just an image. Who cares about which one you think is better? This isn't your site. Nobody cares if you used to work for the Transit Authority. All that nonsensical vandalism just for a damn image? Oh wow. Get over it and move on with your life. It's not that serious.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,167,679

` ==Facebook== Some 107 people ``liked`` this article on Facebook. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,180,354

:Thank you so much! You are very kind. )

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,186,309

::::::Do you think I was detailed enough? Anything more I should include?

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

644,218,722

== Thanks dude! == Yes,we both were right,coz i knew that Meshuggah might release the album on 26th September,2014 but you got hold of the good news and updated my post...Good to see two metalheads help each other..\m/!

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

644,236,421

== Re:Debito Arudou == Hey, I noticed your most recent comment on the Debito Arudou talk page. Thank you for agreeing with me, but I wonder about how constructive it is to repeat the point when Dr. Arudou has already read my initial response and chose for one reason or another not to acknowledge that point. I can tell you and I would probably agree on a lot of points in the real world, but I'd suggest branching out your editing a bit, since it does look a little suspicious when all of your edits are in a single area (read WP:SPA). I like to edit articles related to Japanese literature, but if I only edited in that area other users would likely get suspicious that I'm not really interested in contributing constructively to building an encyclopedia. This is NOT an imputation of your good faith (again, I seem to agree with you on these issues), just a piece of friendly advice. (BTW, if he compares himself to Rosa Parks on this site again, I'm not telling you not to respond then.) ()

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,237,529

::They do - and it usually doesn't work. Their PR depts sometimes have bright ideas, and find themselves very quickly reverted... But most of the articles about big companies are really not by them. A Wikipedia article is a drop in the ocean to them, and sometimes a thorn in the flesh as well (if something they'd rather everyone forgot about is in there...).

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,239,121

REDIRECT Talk:Serpong railway station

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,245,999

` :Neutral, but support move to ``Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham``: It combines all the three major advantages you list. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,251,053

== lost love spell caster +918130636190 == Anyone can contact with me for their problem. I do work specially for poor and needy people which really troubling their life. If you are finding a true and helpful one so don't go anywhere just contact with me by phone line or e-mail. I always ready to solve your problems. Jai Shri Hari. contact:- 8130636190 hnarayan325@gmail.com

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

644,268,139

i think this is some times fake so if you can prove it would be a lot of help to some of us kids who look to this site four help so pleas proof read this stuf that is put on here tanks

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

644,275,239

` :::I'm as baffled as you. / `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,289,046

` ==Blatant editorializing== DVdm, what specific statement have I made that you consider blatant editorializing? I really have no idea what I did that could be considered blatant editorializing. I said, ``The reader should note the equations to be solved are not the equations for a hyperboloid discussed above:``. Do you consider this statement to be blatant editorializing? Now the reason I said this is because the discussion of hyperbolas and hyperboloids could easily mislead the reader. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

644,294,098

` :::::::::: I suggest you re-read the rpoosal. (Pigsonthewing); ; `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

644,300,532

` ==GPS Removed contrarian remark, You removed important material from the GPS Article== , you have removed important material from the article section, ``Problem Description``. You removed a statement that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola. Rather than state what you had done, you gave the vague description, removed contrarian remark. This was a terrible edit on your part because not only is it absolute truth that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola, it is extremely important that the readers be told this fact. The reason for this is because there is much discussion relating to hyperbolas in the section which is quite likely to mislead the reader into believing that the equations to be solved are equations for a hyperbola. The fact that you only say, removed contrarian remark, indicates that you were very superficial in your thinking. It is therefore concluded that we do need a statement alerting readers to the fact that the equations to be solved are not equations for a hyperbola. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

644,316,246

The amount of salt is staggering. It rivals Wookieepedia's freakout over the canon reset.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

644,321,299

, 26 January 2015 (UTC)|decline=You're blocked for not being here to contribute to the encyclopedia, and judging by your contributions, 153 edits with precisely two to the encyclopedia, the block seems correct. 23:01

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

644,324,593

Oh, please. I was just trying to add the No equestrains sign to the Comparison. But you won't stop. BTW, Can you improve Comparison of African Traffic Signs, Fry1989?

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

644,345,006

:I think. I am not sure about the sharpness. But is much-much better on photos than I am.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,352,221

REDIRECT Talk:HMS Stalker (L3515)

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,354,026

` :: So I need to get every editor who has ever edited the article to agree with any change I want to make or you will revert it? Okay. I had assumed that anyone who actually cared about it would have it on their watch list and have responded sometime in the last 5 weeks to the original discussion, which so far is unanimous in rejecting the label ``alternate present``. So, how many months do I need to wait? If you actually have an opinion on the merits of the edit, other than who made it, why not discuss it at the article? I have no idea what you mean by ``what is has been marketed as``. When was it ever marketed as ``alternate present``? There is no citation for that label. It's just what one editor sometime ago wrote. Let him defend it if he cares. `

2,015

false

user

random

test

false

644,372,656

` :::Sorry. This discussion isn't about improving some sentence. It is about reporting what the document Homosexualitatis problema says. As you stated at the beginning, ``The document clearly says 'In fact, circumstances may exist, or may have existed in the past, which would reduce or remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance; or other circumstances may increase it. What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable.' Quote the document directly. Add reliable and notable opinions.`` :::The document mentions ``deliberate choice`` only in relation to the origin of homosexual orientation. It says nothing of deliberate choice in relation to homosexual behaviour. It says nothing about any particular ``when ...`` circumstances that make behaviour a deliberate choice. It just says that the sexual behaviour of homosexuals is not always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. :::We all make many choices that are not deliberate choices, we make many choices without reflection, without even adverting to the fact of making a choice. The culpability or merit of our choices varies not only according to the gravity of the matter, but also according to the deliberateness of our choices. According as a choice is more, or less, or not at all deliberate, the culpability or merit is greater, or less, or null. You say: ``When it isn't compulsive, it is a result of choice.`` To the extent that behaviour is not compulsive, to that extent behaviour is a result of choice, a choice that may be to a greater or less extent or not at all deliberate and thus culpable or meritorious. The extent of compulsion can vary. If it is total, then there is no choice, deliberate or not, and there is no culpability or merit. If it is not total, the freedom of choice is to that extent limited, but the culpability or merit can still be greater, less, or null. What the document says is that the sexual behaviour of homosexuals is not always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. The document does not exclude the view that their sexual behaviour is sometimes totally compulsive and therefore inculpable. The document also does not exclude the view that their sexual behaviour is always partially compulsive and therefore less than totally culpable. :::The document does not say: ``When homosexual activity is the result of deliberate choice, it is not made inculpable by natural sexual orientation.`` At best, that is an original-research conclusion from what it says. :::The document says: ``It has been argued that the homosexual orientation in certain cases is not the result of deliberate choice``. The secondary source that illustrates what the document says of the homosexual tendency by using the analogy of kleptomania says ``no one makes himself a kleptomaniac, and no one really wants to be one``. The document says ``circumstances may exist, or may have existed in the past, which would reduce or remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance; or other circumstances may increase it. What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable.`` The secondary source illustrates what the document says: ``the more compulsive the disorder, the more reduced is the moral culpability for one's actions. Yet we would never say that kleptomaniacs should be allowed to steal at will``. :::What is wrong with the following summaries of what Homosexualitatis problema says on the question, all of which Roscelese has rejected? :::``The letter said that circumstances can reduce or remove an individual's culpability and can also increase it, but that homosexual sexual activity is not always and completely compulsive for homosexual persons.`` :::``Circumstances, the letter said, can diminish or eliminate an individual's culpability, and can also augment it, but it rejected the idea that homosexual activity is always totally compulsive and therefore inculpable for a homosexual person.`` :::``The letter rejects the idea that homosexual activity is always totally compulsive and therefore inculpable for a homosexual person, while also stating that circumstances can diminish or eliminate or also augment an individual's culpability.`` :::Are these not far more faithful to what the document actually says than the meandering original-research ``The letter said that, when homosexual activity is the result of deliberate choice, it is not made inculpable by natural sexual orientation, contradicting the idea that natural orientation rendered it totally inculpable``?`

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

644,379,297

`:The lead currently states ``Making out is an euphemism of American origin, dating back to at least 1949, and is used synonymously with the terms kissing, petting and necking, but may also refer to non-penetrative sex acts such as heavy petting. Snogging is a term with roughly the same meaning in British English and related varieties of English.`` What more is needed to explain what petting is? In the romantic/sexual sense, it's an alternative word for making out. And heavy petting redirects to the Non-penetrative sex article, and is explained there. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

644,381,477

== Swedish intercepts used by NSA/GCHQ. == Although Stockholm decrypts are mentioned in the Venona project article I cannot see that the ca 3600 telegrams intercepted by FRA in Sweden are mentioned. These were given to GCHQ in 1960 and were very important in the continuation of the project. About 390 of these telegrams were subsequently decrypted, partly only in most instances. The book 'Venona', 2003, ISBN 91-89442-84-9 is an excellent account of the Swedish angle to Venona.

2,015

false

article

random

dev

false

644,385,906

for this page to stay online

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,474,641

::::The persecutions we're talking about take place in Jerusalem and in the rest of Israel, so it's suitable to add this kind of information in this article. It is also suitable to speak about persecutions as it appears to be unilateral attacks from a religious majority against a religious minority, unless you have source that shows recurring Christian violence against the Jewish majority... I notice that you've restored your version without valid arguments and before the end of the discussion on the talk page which is uncivil and contrary to Wikipedia's rules. Please, stop removing well documented informations or you will be reported.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,476,592

== I like this article == This article is beautifully neutral and it conveys the topic at hand very well. Heh, just wanted to say something. This article is like a diamond in the rough. It's pretty reassuring seeing something nice amidst so much bad. Good Job.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

644,477,899

` ::::Oh, so that's a grand total of no valid points to make now that your entire point for reverting has been proven to be moot? As I already explained if you would actually have used your comprehension skills (if they even exist), I based it on WWE's own advertising of the event via posters and DVD covers, this is not original research. This is literally what a main event is, seeing as you seemingly aren't aware that ``main event`` does not equal ``last match``. And nice irrelevant referencing of numerous misunderstandings, good use of your time was it? Last warning to revert before you are reported for edit warring, btw. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,479,487

::::::You have repeatedly failed miserably to read, you have repeatedly failed to heed warnings, and you then resorted to completely irrelevant character assassination once you were proven wrong. Explain, please, why anybody should collaborate with you?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,499,466

` == Centric episode(s) == A discussion regarding the meaning and value of listing ``Centric episode(s)`` in the character infobox has been started at Talk:The Walking Dead (TV series)#Character page infoboxes - ``Centric episode(s)``. Please feel free to join discussion if interested. Thanks in advance. - `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

644,508,123

In modern elevators, the stop button is replaced with a key switch, to prevent misuse. Older elevators had stop buttons, although many have had the stop button replaced with a key switch.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

644,509,981

Your chart makes no sense, you realize that, and you're making up nonsense excuses just because don't want to admit that the original is better.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,534,150

== Huggle message == Hey Oliverlyc! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/ Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest. Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks!

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

644,541,711

Comment: While I am still fairly opposed to merging GSL into an existing article that deals with gun politics, I would like to state that Firearm Owners Protection Act seems like a more appropriate choice, given the volumes of information provided by a majority of our sources and citations that infer it as the key source of GSL by both sides of the issue.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,547,103

yes. 20:66 PH Standard Time, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

644,549,410

*Your opinion, and you know what they say about opinions.... and timings of what? The fact that I happened to agree with someone too soon makes me automatically guilty? What an asinine proposition, coming from someone I was not even talking to. The jackassery abounds.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

644,553,255

*Should be fine. Done. —

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,564,557

== Internazionale == Which club do you support ?

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

644,587,565

You're very foolish you know that - right if you want confirmation just visit the official FC Internazionale Milano webpage for news of his signing! Are you daft? He has already been issued with a number (77) at Inter.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

644,598,453

The cause of antisemitic is not neutral at all and misleading and even false. it is true that jews control the media and the banks, do I really have to give you all the name? I can but I won't because wikipedia is . . . jew owned and so biased about it and I will be erased. I just want to tell you guys here that you piece of shit.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

644,599,125

` == Official website? == This site has been added as the ``official`` Randy Rhoads website but it's official status cannot be verified. Any website can claim to be official but this one seems like a mere fan network. Can anyone confirm that this site is official in any way? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,601,641

: I am deleting the notability tag. For whatever issues there may or may not be with the article itself, in the CG world, he is notable enough.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,611,521

Update...It is kelseymar

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,624,941

:: OK, I suppose that's good enough.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,634,068

Going to have to quick fail this. A llllloooooooot of MoS errors (MOS:CAPS, MOS:DASH, WP:ITAL to name a few), prose issues (weasel words aplenty), and a lack of in-text attribution for the analysis. has been inactive since October 2014, so I doubt these issues are going to get fixed in a timely manner. If any bystanders want to fix these mistakes, I'd highly recommend giving it a copy edit or, better yet, requesting one at the Guild of Copy Editors WikiProject page. Thanks.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,636,255

` == On Mohammed Al-Bayati's qualifications == With regards to the edits over the past day, I think that while Mohammed Al-Bayati's qualifications are tangentially relevant, the purpose of the text as they are placed right now is to ``prove`` that Mohammed Al-Bayati is not qualified to review the autopsy report. This I think violates NPOV. If the qualifications are to be included they should come under the ``criticism and controversy`` section, quoted by whoever it is that accused Mohammed Al-Bayati of not being qualified to review the autopsy report is cited. If nobody made the accusations, then this is original synthesis, and should again be removed. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

644,636,397

Can it be reinstated now? I changed the wording.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,643,848

Yes, A very troubling decision, It should have happened years ago

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

644,652,516

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Original Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Thank you for your quiet minor contributions. I hope you like it here and edit more often! Cheers! |}`

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

644,685,902

== Conversion to Islam == There is a mistake. In summer 2014 he converted to Islam. (According to the quoted German articles.)Blum konvertierte zum Islam und fand Halt nach Verletzung Please change it. Thank you in advance

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

644,688,738

Sorry, that was Edwin Welch, actually Edwin James Welch.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

644,699,940

:::It is really troubling when my edits are getting reverted. I do not understand why people are reverting my edits and saying they unconstructive etc. meanwhile I just listed about 10 pages and yet all the flags are still on those pages. I do not understand why you have some sort of fetish with my edits?? Since there are these rules people are mentioning about flags, why are people only taking them seriously on recently added pages, and not on the pages that have been there for some time now?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,700,394

```Just because other stuff doesn't make it write??`` On what grounds? Rules are rules no? If there are flags on other pages, how can people turn a blind eye??? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

644,710,572

Actually no, I couldn't find any verifiable sources for my family page (Why it's so short) so I can understand deletion of that one. The Azzi page, however, I believe is good enough to stay online.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,723,949

` *To many people ``MPV`` is the recording format and the software that writes and plays it, and ``MPV player`` is the handlable electronic device that can play that format. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

644,727,441

:::::I have just researched the how to use the resources of a university that is a short drive from me (thank-you for that idea) and I will be using their resources imminently. I should wait on the HighBeam (thanks for that) as Nikki may have reason to deny my request for access until I can tell her I have exhausted this first idea. I will reply before the weekend is out with an update.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,729,625

You are the biggest idiot I have ever seen. It's not uncredible, your lame brain refuses to believe truth. Unless you can give ME a credible source proving he is a Christian, he's NOT a Christian.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

644,742,454

MusikAnimal is a liar, a disinformant and plague to WP. Please review this disinformants work as he posts nothing but lies on wiki. This website is useless when people like him are ruining it. I will go to major websites and post this. I'm sure my friends at Game Informer and IGN will love to put this in their next issue and on facebook. I will have more views about MusikAnimal than your corrupt wiki pages. I promise

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

644,743,842

` Baer didnt invent video games. This is jewish propaganda supported by a wiki troll named, ``Goldberg`` Go figure. Hey, ``goldberg``, try educating yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfBwz_SiK8s`

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

644,744,155

:::::'Usual argument' here, or more broadly?

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

644,744,214

Alright, your lack of fact checking and denial of truth is pathetic, especially by your staff. Stop making comments, just to harass me. You are assuming I'm everyone who doesn't agree with your wiki article. Pathetic. I will continue to report them until your competent employees do the right thing.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

644,744,505

You cant block me you fucking retard. BRB nigger

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

644,744,617

Personal attacks because you pieces of shit jewniggers change the truth? I'm going to get 100 of my friends to remove mass amounts of pages all week. block that you fucking idiot. WAREZ

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

644,753,851

==Flags== I 100% agree with you User:Alansohn. I only did it because of him, as well as others User:Qed237, User:Meters etc. on Talk:Edmonton (please forward your input to this discussion as I need more support from people with the same opinion to keep flags). They insisted that the flags be taken down especially on Edmonton, Winnipeg, Yellowknife, Iqaluit, Whitehorse, Yukon etc. and threatened me with edit war and blocking violoations for adding flag icons when there is no set in stone rule. Would you mind adding the flags back to these cities, as I do not want to go over the 3RR. Thanks.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,760,325

:::::::I think the undue weight problem can be fixed either way. 1.) Mentioning the Alevi view (in the lead); or 2.) removing the Ahmadi and Bahai views.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,763,744

:::No not really - except for the you know what, but that ye olready promised... . I am happy I found that delightfull girl. Matching the falling guys perfectly.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

644,769,816

Kamen Rider Can you please stop claiming that the changes Darkness made had consensus on the talk page? I'm not sure where people are getting the idea that he undid changes Ryulong had made, the whole idea that this is relevant to Ryulong at all is kinda stupid, because the discussion on the talk page had nothing to do with what Darkness did. I can't vouch for why the admins did what they did, but as far as the animanga wikiproject is concerned, Darkness's edits were inappropriate because they violated the consensus policies on how to romanize names, not because of anything Ryulong was involved in.

2,015

false

user

random

test

false

644,773,944

` == Flag icons == There has been some disputes to have flag icons in the infobox on various cities WP:INFOBOXFLAG states: ``Human geographic articles – for example settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes; however, physical geographic articles – for example, mountains, valleys, rivers, lakes, and swamps – should not. Where a single article covers both human and physical geographic subjects (e.g. Manhattan), or where the status of the territory is subject to a political dispute, the consensus of editors at that article will determine whether flag use in the infobox is preferred or not.`` Meaning that cities, being human geographic articles could potentially be permitted to have flag icons. In addition there are many other articles such as New York City, Moncton, fredericton, Las Vegas, etc. that have flags in the infoboxes. I am interested to see you input. Thanks. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,788,212

:::::::::Ched, either you have misunderstood what has been said or you are addressing another topic altogether; I'm sorry, but I cannot parse your comment.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

644,790,046

::That is a good point you made about its size. The Canadian flag however, is easy recognizable.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

644,805,444

== RECTIFIED? == >>The subsequent insurgency exposed the tanks' vulnerability to rocket-propelled grenades and mines. These problems were partially rectified with the TUSK modification. The Marine Corps sent a company of M1A1 Abrams to Afghanistan in late 2010.<

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

644,831,569

:It was the disdain of the more power-hungry admins for ordinary contributors and the unwillingness of Arbcom (made up, of course, largely of power-hungry admins) to reign them in that made me stop writing stuff for WP. I haven't posted anything under my user name for well over a year now. I have, however, made a few posts to discussions where admin abuse was visible. A certain HJ Mitchell (now where have I seen that user name recently?) blocked me for posting whilst logged out. This, of course, is not a legitimate reason. And someone from the block-first-think-second-but-only-if-you-can-be-bothered school blocked me for being despite my editing from a static IP in a different country from where Vigilant lives. :This site lets people like Mitchell climb the greasy pole through picking on others. (Just look at his activity log and how few of the people he has blocked have blue user talk page links and they aren't all vandals. WP:BITE or what?) Hopefully his plans to get on Arbcom have been pushed back somewhat by this latest escapade.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

644,839,429

` :Started with Sunday Times Rich List, but once all the ``missing`` billionaires from there were on WP, I moved on to Forbes. STRL is printed annually in a magazine format. Think it came out in two parts in 2014 - 11 and 18 May. I have a paper copy of the 18 May part (114 pages). It has details of the top 1,000, with an alphabetical index. All it seems to be missing is the bios of numbers 26-100, instead just the names and net wealth for each. So, I can probably answer any questions. Remeber, STRL is just for Britain and Ireland, but includes foreigners who are deemed to live here. Anything particular I can help on? `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

644,844,910

REDIRECT Talk:Jack Edwards (British politician)

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

644,852,058

== Edit warring == is adding unsourced information to the article, information which is undue (view of one person), and information from the Daily Telegraph which need to be handled carefully as that newspaper is campaigning for the Bill. ||

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

644,873,051

:::::::::::I have not, to date, been provided with any evidence that any creditable historian would support the current article's jewish bias, something which I have reason to believe even Zionists would themselves repudiate. Please explain your last remark, bearing in mind that this this is not a tutorial in some second rate colonial university.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false