dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
645,996,402	::::No. The IP address is different, dude. It's not that hard to believe that several different people just don't agree with your method of how to do the table. And it doesn't matter what Survivor Wikia does, because this is Wikipedia. Your way of doing it just doesn't look right to people. I'm looking at it right now and it just looks off. It's not necessary to make the Dome progress in the order of when they're permanently eliminated. The Dome progress shows when they were eliminated in the Dome. We have the Ex-ile progress table to tell us when they were permanently eliminated. I don't understand why you're the only one who is deciding how it should be done. It's starting to look like you don't want to accept anyone else's opinion, but your own.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
646,038,586	` == Era's == Not every single day of WWE history is a part of some all-encompassing ``era``, stop adding this shite. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	true
646,065,148	` :: I think if this was actually an organized campaign, it might be noteworthy. But, right now, this ``operation`` is just what Jace Conners calls his harassment of Wu and his wild conspiracy theories. If it snowballs into something more, I can see an argument for inclusion. But in the context of all of the Wu critics that exist, he is just a particularly eccentric and loud voice. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
646,074,196	== Sheyi Ojo == Hello GS, could you please restore the history on Sheyi Ojo prior to AfD. He made his Championship debut today. Thanks,	2,015	false	user	random	train	false
646,104,481	` :::I am not sure if you are misunderstanding me? Do you agree that Wikipedia articles are not a word-for-word copy and paste? The use of ``board``, ``council``, or other synonyms is a matter of editorial choice. In fact, to use the exact wording of a source could be a copyvio as close paraphrase. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
646,108,391	` :::::::It cannot be removed, or I will have to create many more articles. — `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,108,493	== edit conflict == potato doesn't belong in that article	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,134,158	:::::Ok, I probably jumped the gun there. I'll find out exactly what the official specifications are as it is important to us and it may just become our national flag. I'll follow the proper process.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,134,575	` == RealDealBillMcNeill is a fool. == According to everyone here, we are not fond of the way you handle the 2002–present page. Do you even watch the product? Many times including the WWE 2K14 video game distinguishes the respective eras. Those being Ruthless Aggression, Universe Era and literally last week as Triple H stated, Reality Era. My contributions are accurate and it's insulting how you have ``Brand Extension`` as if that was the only history for 10 years. I categorized by eras and even added important information you left out, because you think you know better. You are an idiot and need to stop acting like you own this page. Now you've gone and snitched so I can't rightfully edit this page. You are a coward and an idiot.`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	true
646,137,063	You may face serious consequences for your behavior.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
646,141,473	:Good sources you've got there mate. Aye, a video game, that will fly. LOL.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
646,148,209	:::::I've had just about enough of you! Since you have been following me around to different articles I decided to check your contributions and find you secretly posting about me on this talk page. Apparently the ANI you've been posting to wasn't enough? After you obsessively reverted all my sourced edits to the few pages from yesterday, I decided to disengage and move on to other pages. But you've followed me to new pages and continue to revert everything I do without discussion! I understand that there is a subtle bias against IP editors, so this probably won't happen, but you really should be topic banned for this sort of ownership and harassing behavior.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
646,148,220	== At least fix == At least fix the title for Christ's sake. The Brand Extension title makes no sense when you talk about events after that. And I beg you to watch the product. While the PG/Universe Era was never said onscreen, the Ruthless Aggression Era and Reality Era have and are clearly real. One day you will see a documentary on the Network and I guarantee they will be listed as such. Watch Stone Cold's podcast with Triple H from last Monday, there's at least one confirmation for your ignorant narrow headed mind.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,148,855	Bill McNeal is an idiot who thinks he's right, guys. He doesn't watch the product and therefore thinks he can decide what realities don't exist. I agree that respective eras such as Ruthless Aggression, Universe Era and Reality Era need to be mentioned.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,150,093	== REMOVE OBJECTIONABLE OFFENSIVE MATERIAL == Who gave you the right to place that objectionable, offensive material on the biography of Mikhail Tolstykh which is nothing but cheap propaganda? And then you have the audacity to say I am the one vandalizing the page? On what planet? Questionable material is not supposed to be placed on biographies, a legal action could be taken. The supposed Wikipedia rules forbid it. Are you a Nazi or something? By what right do YOU break the rules and I am the one blocked from restoring a biography to its original purpose? YOU are the one who should be blocked. Something is very fishy and it stinks. I am not stupid and naive. I am going to ask nicely one last time to remove that material, it has no business on that biography and you know it. Lies and distortions of the truth are unacceptable. And you have the audacity to block me when I am trying to restore a biography? Watch the international media, you are going to be a star on it. Do you have the guts to stand by what you say and give your real life name? Sirtaki36	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
646,174,599	::: Dear Drmies, I accept the mistake of kindly inviting other editors to investigate and clarify this issue, based on their relation to edits on WW2 and Albania. This is obviously a wrong action of mine, since the editor was very open minded in accepting the considering my sources and did not unilaterally try to block me using his direct/indirect powers. In that situation, I agree with you to not pursue this issue further, and settle it on talk pages.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,183,595	:So, things that are never said on or offscreen, and the future. Good sources you've got there. LOL.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,187,131	REDIRECT Talk:José da Silva (canoeist)	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
646,187,384	Translation of an article Hi Phillipe, how are you? Would you like to translate the english article Twist, Germany (a german village) into portuguese? That would be great. Thank you	2,015	false	user	random	dev	false
646,188,494	` @Shmayo I already know the map from John Speed, but this far away from being an evidence that the Suryoye/Suraye called themselves Assyrians or considered the ancient Assyrians as their ancestors. The ``Deutschen`` don't call themselves Germans (Germanen) or Alemanes (Alemannen) in their native tongue and it's not the first time that the word Suryoye/Suraye was mistranslated into ``Assyrian`` by outsiders:missionaries and colonists. Do you have quotes or chronicles from Nestorian Christians BEFORE the 19th century and in their OWN words, which shows an ethnic Assyrian continuity? The Syriac-Orthodox Church has quotes and chronicles which goes hundreds of years back, where they equate Suryoyo with Oromoyo in their OWN words. Interestingly, the Arameans from Maalula who are either Christian Melkites or Muslims call their Aramaic language/dialect also ``Siryon`` or ``Loghtha Siryanoytha(Aramoytha)``, which is a result of Greek-Christian influence on the Arameans. The word Suryoyo, which literally simply means Syrian in English is rather a religious term similar to Maronites, Catholics or Melkites. Nevertheless words can change their meanings in course of history. Even if the word Suryoyo derives from Assyrian ot doesn't change the fact that the Arameans where also known by this name. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
646,189,093	` Examples like this before the Aramean movement began and in their own words, which was removed from the ``Assyrian people`` page: Mar Jacob of Edessa, died in 708 A.D., says in one of his homilies:``Ho hokuth hnan Oromoye awkith Suryoye``, which means ``It in the same way also we the Arameans, that is to say the Syrians``. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,192,867	:::To continue this discussion I have a problem with NPOV and the title. I think the article should be renamed Russian intervention in Ukraine 2014-2015 because the military aspect is contested but obviously there is an intervention and will open a discussion on it when I figure out how or someone else could do so to save me the bother.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,198,042	==Closure and Deletion of Joel Fram== Hi I'm not sure if I agree withe deletion of this article. I remember reading it an arts related context - he's amusician and writer but the details elude me. I would have contributed to the debate on deletion but was on a wikibreak. Could you please do a TempUndelete so that I can consider an appropriate course of action (if any). Thanks	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,202,464	==Deletion of Sam Smyth== Hi I'm contacting you because as you were the admin that deleted Sam Smyth (at 04:06, 22 August 2010) on grounds of (G3: Vandalism) I had started working in my sandbox, on an article on this notable Irish journalist because it didn't exist. Because many of the bio sources are behind paywalls I wonder if you could do a TempUndelete of short duration so that I can access them and any other pertinent text. Reinventing wheels is a tedious and thankless task. I am aware that we live in diferent time zones so time is not of the essence. Thanks	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,205,327	@129.16.211.99 Sebastian Brock is talking about the disappearance of a SPECIFIC ethnic Aramean race, which is true, but he didn't say that the mixed raced descendants didn't call themselves Arameans. How many nations on this earth are actually of pure race? The same thing happened, when the Arab Muslims invaded the Levant, Mesopotamia and North Africa and intermingled with the local nations, e.g. Berbers, Jews, Arameans, Black people, Copts etc.. After several hundreds of years the Arabs were no longer able to distinguish between pure Arabs and mixed race Arabs. However, their descendants are linguistic and cultural Arabs or do modern Egyptians, Syrians, Tunisians,... don't consider themselves as ethnic Arabs? Are the modern Turks a specific ethnic race? An ethnicity is not only based on genes, if this is that what you mean! You're definitely not simply linguistic Aramaeanized Assyrians, because of the physical presence of the Arameans in Mesopotamia and thus in Assyria. History repeats.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,205,390	==Deletion of Sam Smyth== Hi, I left this message on and noticed afterwards that his last edit was on 19 April 2014 so is obviously not active. Could you oblige or redirect me to an appropriate admin. Thanks Hi I'm contacting you because as you were the admin that deleted Sam Smyth (at 04:06, 22 August 2010) on grounds of (G3: Vandalism) I had started working in my sandbox, on an article on this notable Irish journalist because it didn't exist. Because many of the bio sources are behind paywalls I wonder if you could do a TempUndelete of short duration so that I can access them and any other pertinent text. Reinventing wheels is a tedious and thankless task. I am aware that we live in diferent time zones so time is not of the essence. Thanks (left at )	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
646,214,741	==Deletion of Rafiq Husseini== Hi I'm contacting you because as you were the admin that deleted Dr. Rafiq Husseini (at 23:50, 15 February 2010) on grounds of (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion: Most politicians don't have a shred of notability) While I agree with your general assessment of politicians I disagree it in this instance. He is notable, inter alia, as the Deputy Secretary General (Water and Environment Division), representing Palestine, of the Union for the Mediterranean. This is one (or uniquely) of the few international bodies where representatives Of the states of Israel and Palestine work together in equal roles.I had considered writing an article on him because the distinguished Israeli Secretary General already has one. Reinventing wheels is a tedious and thankless task. I wonder if you could do a TempUndelete so that I can access any citations or other pertinent text to sandbox it and bring it up to scratch. The Mediterranean Union (a Sarkozy, who I disliked, construct) would have been a better mechanism for the EU in the context of the Ukraine and saved the ensuing mess that is still occurring there. Thanks	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,217,477	*Support There are attempts to wipe out Turkish population in Balkans and Caucasia. And there is an article about it. So it should be redirected to. Besides, why Turkish Genocide redirects to Armenian Genocide? There is a procedural problem. Why don't we redirect Armenian massacares to Persecution of Ottoman Muslims? We should not manipulate the terms.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
646,218,296	:Thanks, I suppose Sam Smyth is a common name like Joe Bloggs. The times paywall is an exorbitant 1 pound for a 30 day trial which I am reluctant to pay into Murdoch's pockets. I will get a friend to subscribe for me as my current browser configuration makes form filling difficult. Take it easy.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,254,157	:I don't see how this is a personal attack. This article is very obviously skewed to give the game a better outlook than what it deserves. Most people who have played the game have criticized it, based solely on the metacritic source you people are using and manipulating to make the game seem better than it is. The article written is very obviously a child of nepotism, and sadly, there are no sensible moderators, who are knowledgeable on the matter, and who care enough, that are willing to fix it. Now just watch, quick to cancel out dissent, you guys will label this comment as harassment, and this encyclopedia will have taken another step toward a more biased, and less factual source of knowledge.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
646,257,667	:::How about this: Stop using metacritic as a source. Also don't use the Guardian as a source for the reception of the game. The Guardian, in making the statement that you put in the article, only meant to explain what the game was. They are not game reviewers or critics. Just a couple of quick improvements you could make immediately.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
646,261,152	` I've clearly ignored your latest nonsense post for days now, and I will continue to do so. But I will take appropriate action if you keep adding WP:Undue weight to this article as you here (followup note here). I figured that you would try to add more WP:Undue weight ``gender symmetry`` material to this article, when you stated ``if these points is not resolved, you will start an editing war based on your personal agenda or beliefs`` in your ```` post. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
646,261,359	== February 2015 Wikification drive == Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! )	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,271,704	== Academic Sources == Can anyone find anything ever published by Erhard and solely written by him, in a peer reviewed academic journal. I can't find any anywhere. If I can't find them they don't exist but quite happy to be proven wrong.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,272,135	== Academic Sources == Can anyone find anything ever published by Erhard and solely written by him, in a peer reviewed academic journal. I can't find any anywhere. If I can't find them they don't exist but quite happy to be proven wrong.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,275,306	wikipedia is only open to 10 year old boys.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,280,711	This article is still locked i wanted to change the link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/These_Are_the_Voyages...#Reception to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/These_Are_the_Voyages...#Reception_and_home_media_release but i cannot edit the page.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
646,299,140	` *:1) Artists poplarity is Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED to their songs; if O'Connor is notable, that's why Sinéad O'Connor exists. 2) WP:SONGDAB serves as an extention of WP:DISAMBIGUATION, not vice versa. WP:SONGDAB is used exclusively when there is ambiguity among multiple songs, not only two. 3) WP:TWODABS explains better why this is a WP:TWODABS situation, and why this Grammy-nominated ``Take Me to Church`` overrides the lack of notability of O'Connor's ``Take Me to Church``, which was conveniently released a year later. © (). `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
646,313,598	` *Support per WP:NCF. '''''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
646,316,853	: Hello Lauren, what you wrote at Contested deletion sounds reasonable, and I took the speediness out of the deletion notice, so you have more leisure to improve it. As it stands, it still violates WP:PROMOTION, and it needs a major rewrite to make it be neutral, rather than sound like a CV. Since you appear to have not worked on any other articles, I recommend you join or notify a related WikiProject, such as WikiProject Seattle, where you will find other editors who should be able to help you get this article in encyclopedia shape. —	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,337,544	REDIRECT Talk:Shooting at the 1960 Summer Olympics – Men's 50 metre rifle three positions	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,344,318	` Thanks for taking the time to explain Gbawden. I posted this response to Tokyogirl79 and have also posted here for you. I would also like to request your assistance in gathering and presenting the materials for Wikipedia entries as outlined below. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. (or really just add my voice to the growing dissent that is out there already). Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? Best Regards, J`	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
646,346,307	` Regarding the ``Speedy Deletion`` of my entry for The Resonance Project I am unfamiliar with this interface so hopefully this is the proper ``talk`` process. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,346,629	`Regarding your speedy deletion of my article The Resonance Project I'm unfamiliar with this interface so hopefully this is the proper ``talk`` process. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
646,364,220	` :Support, since I was bold and moved it already for that very reason. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
646,367,377	::Still the same ain't ya. Denying people information.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
646,368,754	` Why did you delete my correspondance without reply? Maybe it was accidental...if so here it is again. Thanks for taking the time to explain Tokyogirl79. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? Best Regards, J `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,369,208	` == Explains everything == ;``I may not respond to any un-civil comments left here`` Well you do like to laud it over your little bit of cyberspace. This site is about information not ``your POV``. Took me all of five minutes to find a reference. Just to prove 1. WP:GF 2. it was not WP:OR. 3. you're a pernicious little bureaucratic type who drives users off this site in droves. Maybe you should stop reverting and do some real contributing? LOL that'll be the day. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
646,371,890	1. correct 2. pertinent 3. done in good faith. So if you are now affronted by my response, it only serves to prove what a thin-skinnned hypocrite you really are.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
646,374,798	I'm not sure that I follow the rationale of your point perhaps you could elaborate on your reasoning?	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
646,396,007	==Semi-major axis== Am I reading that the diameter is 12955759 km (obviously not correct), or is there supposed to be some formatting that I'm missing?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,404,923	Thank you for your reply. I'm not sure what your background is but I'm guessing it's not quantum mechanics or sacred geometry, as neither of which are fringe topics as you describe. Perhaps you should stick to deleting subject matter for which you are more familiar, and i mean that sincerely...we are all on a path learning as we go; me, you, everyone...no judgement. But I do think we should be less zealous in our administration of subjects we are not well versed in, because we tend to miss the subtlety which separates leading edge, from tin-foil-hat illusion. It's always hard to see past our horizons, oftentimes even for those familiar with the subject matter. It's very likely you will look back at this as your Dick Rowe moment when the principles involved here go onto form the basis for technology that will revolutionize the world. And I will be sure to remind you when the time comes so you can benefit from the lesson. Don't feel bad for me, I have no personal stake in this other than recognizing the truth and raising awareness; the real winners will be those who are suffering the most in this world. Mass media, including Wikipedia is much more powerful in influencing reality than you realize, and the small cost of a Wikipedia entry for The Resonance Project and Nassim Haramein would be very helpful in speeding things up, and ultimately cost nothing but tolerance.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
646,409,709	People, scientists and the like, want to know if a result is statistically significant. No one cares about the significance level or critical levels, because most of the time, those levels are fixed. Thus, your point about statistical significance being a consequence of choosing a significance level is a non sequitur. Statistical significance is also consequence of calculating means and standard errors. And in non-parametric cases, in terms of rank. Does that mean we should rename this article in terms of mean differences?	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
646,416,661	The article I will be working on is on [[Economic water scarcity	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
646,432,439	== Better organisational structure == This leadership section would be allot more clear and concise if they were organised like the Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula senior leaders here or the Taliban leaders here: .	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,457,464	== Article clones == This may seem like an odd question, but I don't know any administrators so I got your name from the Wikipedia admin list. My question is this: How can you merge or even delete an article when there are three articles of the same person? 1.)Abdul Rauf Aliza 2.)Abdul Rauf (Taliban governor) 3.)Abdul Rauf (ISIS recruiter) The last two articles should be deleted, as they have the least amount of content in them. How can I do this??	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
646,463,794	` == Proposed merge with Satyender Kumar Jain == Both articles for the same politician. Since Satyender Kumar Jain was created earlier, it should be retained. Thanks '''''' `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
646,467,778	` :WP:BURDEN is with you. '''''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,508,885	`==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:From the Ages/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: · Should have this one to you within a day ☯ ☯ `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
646,534,797	has no life or friends	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,535,567	`OK! Disappointing that you've been outted as not being up for the job. '''''' ::::::::`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
646,535,859	` *Oppose We disambig by the year the film was first released, no matter where that was. '''''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,536,151	` == re: Various questions == Short answer: Yes. Production companies are fine, the distribution ones are a bit of a grey area and are often non-defining. For example, a non-English language film will have different distribution companies in the US/UK. Might be worth raising it at WT:FILM as it's one area I don't do much editing in. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,536,370	` == Bishonen == So are you his lackey or just a sycophant? He's a big boy, shame he has to call on his underlings to do his bidding. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
646,543,021	` :And you are? Let me know when you've crawled out of their arses. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,543,923	`:Hi Paul. For info, I've now added bios for all the shooters at the 1948 Games. I think they're all in the correct categories for living/possibly living, etc. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,544,875	` :Powertrip much? '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,545,157	` ::Have a read of WP:BLOCKNOTPUNITIVE and WP:CIR. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
646,549,965	In my raising it is not an insult to request someone's financial interest in publishing a claim to their veracity or non-bias. Apparently that is not the case in these quarters. Thank you for the lesson.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
646,559,473	` == Would you kindly advise Montanbw that I have requested 3rd party resolution? == I am unable to make an entry on ``Montanabs``'s talk page in order to advise him that I have requested 3rd party resolution of our editing dispute? Thank you. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,561,031	Thank you again for the lesson. People have accused me of threatening and abusive behavior since I raised questions about the invasion of Iraq. Since before that even. I keep hoping I will some day find a tactful way to expose greed and deceit, but it has, alas, continued to elude me. I am heaping ashes on my head.Please forgive me if I have committed lese majeste	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,564,297	`. Years of adversity and meditation have taught me that when people cry ``abuse`` when you ask about money, there is ALWAYS dirty work at the crossroads`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,564,870	Well done, I hope to find time to thank you more fully for your efforts in this area in the future. At the moment I don't have time to look at your diifs but I hope to save that for the morning. Thank you for your contributions which are all appreciated even if you make an error.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
646,568,161	== Events happening in Dublin == Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,568,764	*Oppose. Air forces were unknown prior to 1917. The Austro-Hungarian air force should not be enshrined as the Austro-Hungarian Air Force.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
646,573,530	It doesn't matter; I think I understand what you're trying to teach me, but even if I don't I appreciate your effort, so thanks! I could better explain why I thought you rejected WP:CIVILITY, but that's not important, and I would just be dragging stale diffs into it, which I agree is a distasteful time-sink. If I've misjudged you I sincerely apologize. I'll be more careful about that in the future.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
646,594,341	_______________________________________________________________ Yes yes yes, 094 conducted patrol in 2014 without missiles. The Chinese are so stupid that they can not even make a missile work. Go ahead USA start a nuclear war now with China. You most hated and bitter enemy. They utterly destroyed your economy and is your biggest debt holder. Go ahead USA nuke China, they do not even have a missile that work !!	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	true
646,596,270	== 5 093 are in service. I have backed up my claim with Chinese source which is more crediable than RevolvingPersonalityConduct's US Department of Defense Source. 093 is a Chinese SSN == Hello Iwilsonp, I have added sources to the 093 page. Please protect that page from RevolvingPersonalityConduct. He is an online troll whom repeatedly vandalize Wikipedia pages ! Thank you	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
646,611,996	== Left wing? == If the CEC is inspired and close to the LaRouche movement, it is left wing, nor right wing.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
646,613,657	` ==Similarity to ``Boy Kings``== Section on similarity between this book and The Boy Kings was deleted. The facts in question are easily verified. What was the reason for this deletion? noviceuser Re: the two flags: on notability, the book has received substantial media attention. See, for example, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323342404579081503189753492.html In addition, the author himself is critically acclaimed (see his page). On sources, Amazon is a credible source for the topic in question, the relative contents of two books. The Twitter sources are necessary given that 1. Twitter is the topic being discussed (specifically: discussions on Twitter about the book), and 2. the issue is new and has not yet been written about in mainstream publications. These sources can be improved as additional information and media coverage becomes available which is likely given the high profile of the author, the ongoing media attention to the book, and the fact that The Circle will soon be released. noviceuser :If it's easily verified, it shouldn't be hard to find secondary sources to support it. Agreed, that is a fair point, though it will only be easy to do so if sufficient time has passed for secondary sources to pick up on it which they haven't yet. It was only a matter of hours ago that the alleged victim of plagiarism was made aware of the details of the book in question (The Circle) and therefore able to point out the similarities. In the coming days it is likely to receive more attention. The female author in question has upward of 1,500 Twitter followers and a well-received book on Amazon and the other comments on Twitter corroborating her interpretation also come from prominent Tweeters. While I am a Wikipedia novice, it does not seem that this is an unusually suspect story to report in somewhat-real-time versus other pages that are rapidly updated, and to reiterate, it is very obvious from reading the respective Amazon pages that there are myriad similarities between the books and it is only a matter of time before this is picked up. noviceuser Update: a secondary source is now available. Updating accordingly. noviceuser :I see your edit was removed by a bot. I don't think it's impossible that there might surface secondary sources to support this part of the article, but these aren't them. Tweets are generally considered unsuitable, which is why bots remove them. And that Medium post isn't a suitable source either. 1) it's written by the person who is theoretically the aggrieved party in this case, 2) Medium is basically a self-publishing platform, like Livejournal, and doesn't really qualify as a secondary source, especially in the case of a potentially contentious allegation like this. Let's not let this plagiarism flap stand in the way of making this a better article. It could use a lot of improvement. My personal opinion is that the plagiarism claim (which amounts to ``I wrote a book about a woman hired by a social networking firm, and any similar books are plagiarism``) should not be included in the article anyway, in the absence of a lawsuit or settlement. So let's get some interesting stuff about the book in there. For one thing, Margaret Atwood reviewed the book at length. Eric`	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
646,619,895	` :I have made no such threat, via email, or any other method. JPE is unhappy with his recent block at WP:3RR. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
646,620,021	` :It's OK folks, FreeRangeFrog is clearly making up for an inadequacy in their own life and needs to do what they did. Nice to see all the old glory hunters returning en-masse. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
646,621,889	Were that true you would not be uttering a fantastic story about the BBC cooking up lies to make it seem to be so.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,626,163	` As to your claim that true American Appaloosa breeding stock is plentiful with an adequate gene pool, this.... ``During the Depression years, interest in the breed revived and the few surviving horses were used to create the foundation of the breed. The Appaloosa Horse club was created in 1938. Since then, the Appaloosa Horse has become the third largest breed registry in the world.`` Meet the Appaloosa,By Katherine Blocksdorf,Horses Expert So now tell me how you went from a few surviving horses to the third largest breed registry without inbreeding. And then tell me why you are so adamantly opposed to adding genes from this newly found Krygyz stock instead of arabians and quarter horses. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,627,052	:This lying piece of Communist garbage should feel neither comfortable nor safe.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
646,627,076	` :::I like to know where I stand when someone makes a false accusation against me. '''''' `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
646,627,389	` ::Jesus, this guy really is a piece of shit isn't he? What kind of state is Western civilisation in when garbage like this is allowed anywhere near academia? ::It's always the same ``fringe`` lie. He learned to parrot it from Rubenstein. Have you read WD Hamilton's review? ::You are just a liar Maunus. You are a disgusting, worthless person. ::``the only favorable ones are by people who are obviously their comrades-in-arms`` ::``comrades-in-arms`` being people who agree with the reasoning? How convenient. Who's the comrade shithead? `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
646,636,582	` == Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself == Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social-networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST: ``Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account.`` The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
646,639,835	` == Edit disagreements == #Where are you getting the figure range for '300-3000' from? I couldn't find these figures in any of the sources you cited, unless you're estimating based on predictions from the article. #Abu Omar al-Shishani is not the chief in command of both Iraq and Syria. This is ridiculous. I don't know why so many people believe this. I suspect it might be becuase he is so prevalent in the IS propaganda that he is somehow the Islamic State's version of Napoleon Bonaparte. I cannot find any reputable source claiming he is anything more than a field commander in northern Syria. He doesn't even feature in any IS leadership hierarchies, which are almost exclusively staffed by Iraqis who have been in the organisations since the early-mid 2000's. When the former commander of the IS Military Council passed away in June 2014 (Abu Abdulrahman al-Bilawi), Iraqi secutyi forces found some memory sticks and a laptop containing the following leadership information currently pieced together by western analysts. Note how al-Shishani doesn't feature in any of them, save one which turned out to be incorrect. Here they are: , , . Here is the false one which showed al-Shishani succeeding al-Bilawi as the IS military chief of the Military Shura: . However, it was Abu Ayman al-Iraqi, another IS Iraqi commander who had been in the organisation years before al-Shishani had joined who succeeded al-Bilawi as the Chief of the Military Shura. He is shown in the graph as Adnan Latif Hamid al-Sweidawi which is his real name. You never see the upper echelons of the IS hierarchy, the ones who actually control everything. They are not shown in IS propaganda. They are clandestine, mysterious, shadowy figures. Only the pawns are revealed. #You keep stating that Jamaat-ul-Ahrar have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State. This is just not true. You might get this impression becuase they broke away from the TTP or the Pakistani Taliban, which swear allegiance to the head of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Omar. But the spokesperson for Jamaat-ul-Ahrar stated that they pledged allegiance to the Taliban leader . The leader of Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, Omar Khalid has strong ties to Ayman al-Zawahiri and Al-Qaeda, a nemesis to the Islamic State. #You state that Abu Sayyaf have sworn allegiance to the Islamic State, however, the man who swore allegiance to them is not the groups leader, so it is unclear whether or not he is representing Abu Sayyaf or a splinter faction. #You write that Ansar al-Islam is an Al-Qaeda affiliate, but I can find little to no proof affirming this position. The leadership of Ansar al-Islam have rejected the notion that they swear allegiance to al-Qaeda, despite collaborating with their affiliates, such as the al-Nusra Front.U.S. terrorism expert Rohan Gunaratna in January 2003 however disagreed with Krekar and affirmed links of Ansar with al-Qaeda: “Ansar al-Islam has links with al-Qaeda – in fact it is an associate group of al-Qaeda”.]. The U.S Defense Intelligence Agency seemed to have affirmed this when they wrote ``Ansar al-Islam is an independent organization that receives assistance from al-Qaeda, but is not a branch of the group.``DIA, Special Analysis, July 31, 2002, cited in Postwar Findings about Iraq's WMD Programs and Links to Terrorism and How they Compare with Prewar Assessments, pg. 71.`	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
646,640,843	:This is the source for Barqah, Sinai and Algeria Province of the Islamic State: . Are you telling me that the British Broadcasting Corporation are no more reliable than the onion news network..? Furthermore, the burden of proof for me has been proven by this cited source which identifies the logos as being the representations of the Provinces. The only way to disprove this is to find a source which is contradictory.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,641,915	Islamic State dating back to al-Qaeda in Iraq in	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
646,645,169	::: So does this mean I have been Wiki-vanquished?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,689,506	` The question at hand is whether these are true facts that are pertinent to this Wikipedia page and thus deserve to be judged by the people who read it. This is, after all, a page in the Wikipedia and not your personal property. Is that not so? These facts are as follows: 1) Substantial numbers of horses which show many characteristics of purebred Appaloosas have been found in 2014 living in a remote mountain valley of Kyrgyzstan near the Chinese border. These horses exhibit spots, white sclerae, and striped hooves. 2) a DNA analysis conducted by Dr. Gus Cothran at Texas A & M University shows that these Kyrgyzstan horses closely match purebred American Appaloosas in their genetics. 3) As of 2015, controversy exists as to whether these horses should be considered true Appaloosas. A BBC documentary shows the 69-year-old female New Zealand Appaloosa breeder who rode horseback over a 13,777 foot mountain pass to find these horses. This documentary clearly shows these horses in their native milieu and discusses the DNA evidence. Now Mr. Montanabw Sir, are those facts not true? Are they not germane? People come to this Wikipedia Appaloosa page to learn current and pertinent facts about Appaloosas. In that context neither your opinion nor mine count for a plug nickel. Therefore I will now repeat my question . Exactly why are you continuing to refuse the addition of these facts to this Wikipedia page? If you wish, I don't see why an additional section cannot be added entitled ``Kyrgyzstan horse controversy`` containing this information. Can you? Because if we can't resolve this question here, that is the issue I am going to ask the next level to resolve. I will not ask them to decide about LP genes or whether the BBC has made up some fairy story about the Appaloosa or whether the moon is made of green cheese. I will ask them whether you are in your legitimate rights to deny the inclusion of this information to the Wikipedia readers. Am I speaking clearly enough, Mister? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,696,117	` As we are apparently at an impasse over this question, I will set aside tomorrow to ask for third party resolution. As to your theory of your ``right`` to suppress these facts, I don't give two cents for your words after that ignorant, preposterous, country bumpkin lie of yours about the BBC broadcasting lies in their story so they can drum up viewers like Fox news does. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,700,470	` I watched that show ( Secret Horse: The quest for the true Appaloosa) and the end credits clearly stated ``Copyright BBC MMXV``. You would have seen that too if you had actually seen it - as opposed to talking through your hat. The lies of you ``honest men`` are lame, preposterous, and tedious in the extreme. :British horse lovers are a substantial portion of BBC viewers and would never have stood for that manky nonsense you so blithely accuse them of. That is a reality well known to the BBC - even if it hasn't soaked into the Red state boondocks. Sorry indeed. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,723,041	` == Reverting for no reason == Hi. I see you undid edits I made, with the summary ``http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=From_The_Doctor_to_my_son_Thomas&diff;=646666152&oldid;=646565498 keep approp formatting from WP:GA version]. As I'm sure you're aware, that is an entirely meaningless edit summary. It was not formatting that I changed, and the fact that an article has a little green cross does not mean that it cannot be improved. So, if you had an actual reason for the revert, please state what it is. If you didn't, then please don't do that again. You're damaging the encyclopaedia. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
646,730,263	==Arizona== Yes Tony, that is an uncanny resemblance! In addition to the overall shape, dimension and coastline contour...here's about ten details that match!	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
646,735,356	` ==The SPÖ in Mein Kampf== At one moment Hitler lauded the Social Democratic Party in his mind (Friedrich Austerlitz, Anton David, Viktor Adler and Wilhelm Ellenbogen are mentioned by their last names on p. 66 of Mein Kampf) for championing ``das allgemeine und geheime Wahlrecht`` (Mein Kampf, p. 39) or universal suffrage, saying to himself that this must lead to a weakening of Habsburg monarchic rule. When he later saw more of what the party was about however, he suggested its members were disfavoring Germans in an attempt to save the multiethnic melting pot of Austria-Hungary. It appears he was pressured to join the trade union and that men of Jewish heritage were influential in the party (Mein Kampf, pgs. 39, 40, 65 and 66).Mein Kampf, Erster Band, 2. Kapitel `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,735,561	angered that he was asked	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
646,740,615	:GA doesn't imply a final endorsement of the article contents. The quotes are present in the text, and it is entirely pointless to duplicate them in boxes. Why do you think they are necessary?	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false

645,996,402

::::No. The IP address is different, dude. It's not that hard to believe that several different people just don't agree with your method of how to do the table. And it doesn't matter what Survivor Wikia does, because this is Wikipedia. Your way of doing it just doesn't look right to people. I'm looking at it right now and it just looks off. It's not necessary to make the Dome progress in the order of when they're permanently eliminated. The Dome progress shows when they were eliminated in the Dome. We have the Ex-ile progress table to tell us when they were permanently eliminated. I don't understand why you're the only one who is deciding how it should be done. It's starting to look like you don't want to accept anyone else's opinion, but your own.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

646,038,586

` == Era's == Not every single day of WWE history is a part of some all-encompassing ``era``, stop adding this shite. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

true

646,065,148

` :: I think if this was actually an organized campaign, it might be noteworthy. But, right now, this ``operation`` is just what Jace Conners calls his harassment of Wu and his wild conspiracy theories. If it snowballs into something more, I can see an argument for inclusion. But in the context of all of the Wu critics that exist, he is just a particularly eccentric and loud voice. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

646,074,196

== Sheyi Ojo == Hello GS, could you please restore the history on Sheyi Ojo prior to AfD. He made his Championship debut today. Thanks,

2,015

false

user

random

train

false

646,104,481

` :::I am not sure if you are misunderstanding me? Do you agree that Wikipedia articles are not a word-for-word copy and paste? The use of ``board``, ``council``, or other synonyms is a matter of editorial choice. In fact, to use the exact wording of a source could be a copyvio as close paraphrase. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

646,108,391

` :::::::It cannot be removed, or I will have to create many more articles. — `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,108,493

== edit conflict == potato doesn't belong in that article

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,134,158

:::::Ok, I probably jumped the gun there. I'll find out exactly what the official specifications are as it is important to us and it may just become our national flag. I'll follow the proper process.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,134,575

` == RealDealBillMcNeill is a fool. == According to everyone here, we are not fond of the way you handle the 2002–present page. Do you even watch the product? Many times including the WWE 2K14 video game distinguishes the respective eras. Those being Ruthless Aggression, Universe Era and literally last week as Triple H stated, Reality Era. My contributions are accurate and it's insulting how you have ``Brand Extension`` as if that was the only history for 10 years. I categorized by eras and even added important information you left out, because you think you know better. You are an idiot and need to stop acting like you own this page. Now you've gone and snitched so I can't rightfully edit this page. You are a coward and an idiot.`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

true

646,137,063

You may face serious consequences for your behavior.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

646,141,473

:Good sources you've got there mate. Aye, a video game, that will fly. LOL.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

646,148,209

:::::I've had just about enough of you! Since you have been following me around to different articles I decided to check your contributions and find you secretly posting about me on this talk page. Apparently the ANI you've been posting to wasn't enough? After you obsessively reverted all my sourced edits to the few pages from yesterday, I decided to disengage and move on to other pages. But you've followed me to new pages and continue to revert everything I do without discussion! I understand that there is a subtle bias against IP editors, so this probably won't happen, but you really should be topic banned for this sort of ownership and harassing behavior.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

646,148,220

== At least fix == At least fix the title for Christ's sake. The Brand Extension title makes no sense when you talk about events after that. And I beg you to watch the product. While the PG/Universe Era was never said onscreen, the Ruthless Aggression Era and Reality Era have and are clearly real. One day you will see a documentary on the Network and I guarantee they will be listed as such. Watch Stone Cold's podcast with Triple H from last Monday, there's at least one confirmation for your ignorant narrow headed mind.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,148,855

Bill McNeal is an idiot who thinks he's right, guys. He doesn't watch the product and therefore thinks he can decide what realities don't exist. I agree that respective eras such as Ruthless Aggression, Universe Era and Reality Era need to be mentioned.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,150,093

== REMOVE OBJECTIONABLE OFFENSIVE MATERIAL == Who gave you the right to place that objectionable, offensive material on the biography of Mikhail Tolstykh which is nothing but cheap propaganda? And then you have the audacity to say I am the one vandalizing the page? On what planet? Questionable material is not supposed to be placed on biographies, a legal action could be taken. The supposed Wikipedia rules forbid it. Are you a Nazi or something? By what right do YOU break the rules and I am the one blocked from restoring a biography to its original purpose? YOU are the one who should be blocked. Something is very fishy and it stinks. I am not stupid and naive. I am going to ask nicely one last time to remove that material, it has no business on that biography and you know it. Lies and distortions of the truth are unacceptable. And you have the audacity to block me when I am trying to restore a biography? Watch the international media, you are going to be a star on it. Do you have the guts to stand by what you say and give your real life name? Sirtaki36

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

646,174,599

::: Dear Drmies, I accept the mistake of kindly inviting other editors to investigate and clarify this issue, based on their relation to edits on WW2 and Albania. This is obviously a wrong action of mine, since the editor was very open minded in accepting the considering my sources and did not unilaterally try to block me using his direct/indirect powers. In that situation, I agree with you to not pursue this issue further, and settle it on talk pages.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,183,595

:So, things that are never said on or offscreen, and the future. Good sources you've got there. LOL.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,187,131

REDIRECT Talk:José da Silva (canoeist)

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

646,187,384

Translation of an article Hi Phillipe, how are you? Would you like to translate the english article Twist, Germany (a german village) into portuguese? That would be great. Thank you

2,015

false

user

random

dev

false

646,188,494

` @Shmayo I already know the map from John Speed, but this far away from being an evidence that the Suryoye/Suraye called themselves Assyrians or considered the ancient Assyrians as their ancestors. The ``Deutschen`` don't call themselves Germans (Germanen) or Alemanes (Alemannen) in their native tongue and it's not the first time that the word Suryoye/Suraye was mistranslated into ``Assyrian`` by outsiders:missionaries and colonists. Do you have quotes or chronicles from Nestorian Christians BEFORE the 19th century and in their OWN words, which shows an ethnic Assyrian continuity? The Syriac-Orthodox Church has quotes and chronicles which goes hundreds of years back, where they equate Suryoyo with Oromoyo in their OWN words. Interestingly, the Arameans from Maalula who are either Christian Melkites or Muslims call their Aramaic language/dialect also ``Siryon`` or ``Loghtha Siryanoytha(Aramoytha)``, which is a result of Greek-Christian influence on the Arameans. The word Suryoyo, which literally simply means Syrian in English is rather a religious term similar to Maronites, Catholics or Melkites. Nevertheless words can change their meanings in course of history. Even if the word Suryoyo derives from Assyrian ot doesn't change the fact that the Arameans where also known by this name. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

646,189,093

` Examples like this before the Aramean movement began and in their own words, which was removed from the ``Assyrian people`` page: Mar Jacob of Edessa, died in 708 A.D., says in one of his homilies:``Ho hokuth hnan Oromoye awkith Suryoye``, which means ``It in the same way also we the Arameans, that is to say the Syrians``. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,192,867

:::To continue this discussion I have a problem with NPOV and the title. I think the article should be renamed Russian intervention in Ukraine 2014-2015 because the military aspect is contested but obviously there is an intervention and will open a discussion on it when I figure out how or someone else could do so to save me the bother.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,198,042

==Closure and Deletion of Joel Fram== Hi I'm not sure if I agree withe deletion of this article. I remember reading it an arts related context - he's amusician and writer but the details elude me. I would have contributed to the debate on deletion but was on a wikibreak. Could you please do a TempUndelete so that I can consider an appropriate course of action (if any). Thanks

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,202,464

==Deletion of Sam Smyth== Hi I'm contacting you because as you were the admin that deleted Sam Smyth (at 04:06, 22 August 2010) on grounds of (G3: Vandalism) I had started working in my sandbox, on an article on this notable Irish journalist because it didn't exist. Because many of the bio sources are behind paywalls I wonder if you could do a TempUndelete of short duration so that I can access them and any other pertinent text. Reinventing wheels is a tedious and thankless task. I am aware that we live in diferent time zones so time is not of the essence. Thanks

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,205,327

@129.16.211.99 Sebastian Brock is talking about the disappearance of a SPECIFIC ethnic Aramean race, which is true, but he didn't say that the mixed raced descendants didn't call themselves Arameans. How many nations on this earth are actually of pure race? The same thing happened, when the Arab Muslims invaded the Levant, Mesopotamia and North Africa and intermingled with the local nations, e.g. Berbers, Jews, Arameans, Black people, Copts etc.. After several hundreds of years the Arabs were no longer able to distinguish between pure Arabs and mixed race Arabs. However, their descendants are linguistic and cultural Arabs or do modern Egyptians, Syrians, Tunisians,... don't consider themselves as ethnic Arabs? Are the modern Turks a specific ethnic race? An ethnicity is not only based on genes, if this is that what you mean! You're definitely not simply linguistic Aramaeanized Assyrians, because of the physical presence of the Arameans in Mesopotamia and thus in Assyria. History repeats.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,205,390

==Deletion of Sam Smyth== Hi, I left this message on and noticed afterwards that his last edit was on 19 April 2014 so is obviously not active. Could you oblige or redirect me to an appropriate admin. Thanks Hi I'm contacting you because as you were the admin that deleted Sam Smyth (at 04:06, 22 August 2010) on grounds of (G3: Vandalism) I had started working in my sandbox, on an article on this notable Irish journalist because it didn't exist. Because many of the bio sources are behind paywalls I wonder if you could do a TempUndelete of short duration so that I can access them and any other pertinent text. Reinventing wheels is a tedious and thankless task. I am aware that we live in diferent time zones so time is not of the essence. Thanks (left at )

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

646,214,741

==Deletion of Rafiq Husseini== Hi I'm contacting you because as you were the admin that deleted Dr. Rafiq Husseini (at 23:50, 15 February 2010) on grounds of (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion: Most politicians don't have a shred of notability) While I agree with your general assessment of politicians I disagree it in this instance. He is notable, inter alia, as the Deputy Secretary General (Water and Environment Division), representing Palestine, of the Union for the Mediterranean. This is one (or uniquely) of the few international bodies where representatives Of the states of Israel and Palestine work together in equal roles.I had considered writing an article on him because the distinguished Israeli Secretary General already has one. Reinventing wheels is a tedious and thankless task. I wonder if you could do a TempUndelete so that I can access any citations or other pertinent text to sandbox it and bring it up to scratch. The Mediterranean Union (a Sarkozy, who I disliked, construct) would have been a better mechanism for the EU in the context of the Ukraine and saved the ensuing mess that is still occurring there. Thanks

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,217,477

*Support There are attempts to wipe out Turkish population in Balkans and Caucasia. And there is an article about it. So it should be redirected to. Besides, why Turkish Genocide redirects to Armenian Genocide? There is a procedural problem. Why don't we redirect Armenian massacares to Persecution of Ottoman Muslims? We should not manipulate the terms.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

646,218,296

:Thanks, I suppose Sam Smyth is a common name like Joe Bloggs. The times paywall is an exorbitant 1 pound for a 30 day trial which I am reluctant to pay into Murdoch's pockets. I will get a friend to subscribe for me as my current browser configuration makes form filling difficult. Take it easy.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,254,157

:I don't see how this is a personal attack. This article is very obviously skewed to give the game a better outlook than what it deserves. Most people who have played the game have criticized it, based solely on the metacritic source you people are using and manipulating to make the game seem better than it is. The article written is very obviously a child of nepotism, and sadly, there are no sensible moderators, who are knowledgeable on the matter, and who care enough, that are willing to fix it. Now just watch, quick to cancel out dissent, you guys will label this comment as harassment, and this encyclopedia will have taken another step toward a more biased, and less factual source of knowledge.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

646,257,667

:::How about this: Stop using metacritic as a source. Also don't use the Guardian as a source for the reception of the game. The Guardian, in making the statement that you put in the article, only meant to explain what the game was. They are not game reviewers or critics. Just a couple of quick improvements you could make immediately.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

646,261,152

` I've clearly ignored your latest nonsense post for days now, and I will continue to do so. But I will take appropriate action if you keep adding WP:Undue weight to this article as you here (followup note here). I figured that you would try to add more WP:Undue weight ``gender symmetry`` material to this article, when you stated ``if these points is not resolved, you will start an editing war based on your personal agenda or beliefs`` in your ```` post. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

646,261,359

== February 2015 Wikification drive == Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! )

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,271,704

== Academic Sources == Can anyone find anything ever published by Erhard and solely written by him, in a peer reviewed academic journal. I can't find any anywhere. If I can't find them they don't exist but quite happy to be proven wrong.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,272,135

== Academic Sources == Can anyone find anything ever published by Erhard and solely written by him, in a peer reviewed academic journal. I can't find any anywhere. If I can't find them they don't exist but quite happy to be proven wrong.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,275,306

wikipedia is only open to 10 year old boys.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,280,711

This article is still locked i wanted to change the link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/These_Are_the_Voyages...#Reception to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/These_Are_the_Voyages...#Reception_and_home_media_release but i cannot edit the page.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

646,299,140

` *:1) Artists poplarity is Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED to their songs; if O'Connor is notable, that's why Sinéad O'Connor exists. 2) WP:SONGDAB serves as an extention of WP:DISAMBIGUATION, not vice versa. WP:SONGDAB is used exclusively when there is ambiguity among multiple songs, not only two. 3) WP:TWODABS explains better why this is a WP:TWODABS situation, and why this Grammy-nominated ``Take Me to Church`` overrides the lack of notability of O'Connor's ``Take Me to Church``, which was conveniently released a year later. © (). `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

646,313,598

` *Support per WP:NCF. '''''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

646,316,853

: Hello Lauren, what you wrote at Contested deletion sounds reasonable, and I took the speediness out of the deletion notice, so you have more leisure to improve it. As it stands, it still violates WP:PROMOTION, and it needs a major rewrite to make it be neutral, rather than sound like a CV. Since you appear to have not worked on any other articles, I recommend you join or notify a related WikiProject, such as WikiProject Seattle, where you will find other editors who should be able to help you get this article in encyclopedia shape. —

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,337,544

REDIRECT Talk:Shooting at the 1960 Summer Olympics – Men's 50 metre rifle three positions

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,344,318

` Thanks for taking the time to explain Gbawden. I posted this response to Tokyogirl79 and have also posted here for you. I would also like to request your assistance in gathering and presenting the materials for Wikipedia entries as outlined below. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. (or really just add my voice to the growing dissent that is out there already). Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? Best Regards, J`

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

646,346,307

` Regarding the ``Speedy Deletion`` of my entry for The Resonance Project I am unfamiliar with this interface so hopefully this is the proper ``talk`` process. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,346,629

`Regarding your speedy deletion of my article The Resonance Project I'm unfamiliar with this interface so hopefully this is the proper ``talk`` process. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

646,364,220

` :Support, since I was bold and moved it already for that very reason. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

646,367,377

::Still the same ain't ya. Denying people information.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

646,368,754

` Why did you delete my correspondance without reply? Maybe it was accidental...if so here it is again. Thanks for taking the time to explain Tokyogirl79. I have no affiliation with The Resonance Project aside from Nassim Haramein's lectures giving some validation to ideas I have been thinking about for a long time, but for which it has been hard to find reliable information about. At times the subject seems to have been suppressed by the science establishment either purposefully or just out of hubris, and anyone discussing the subject publicly ridiculed. Either way it's ``flat-earth society`` type behaviour that I find objectionable. I understand your points but disagree, particularly on the notability aspect. I can easily find scores of entries regarding subjects of less notability than The Resonance Project on Wikipedia. I am suspicious of the motivation to so quickly suppress my expression of free speech in this so called ``community``. Instead of offering a chance for me to bring my article into compliance with Wikipedia standards you quickly deleted it, and by doing so silenced my opinions. Thats wrong. And although a comment made by another editor stated that I had a chance to contest the ``Speedy Deletion`` I could find no such option. When you have notability thresholds for a supposedly public community which rely on mainstream media to set the bar, and the mainstream media is owned and virtually controlled by a few select individuals and organizations with their own agendas, then you have a problem. Wikipedia you have a problem, and if I can't get entries for ``Nassim Haramein`` and ``The Resonance Project`` in I am going to begin a campaign to discredit and inform of the corruption of Wikipedia, the not-so-``free`` encyclopedia. Wake up Wikipedia editors...open your eyes and minds and be a force for good in the world, not another puppet. This new field of spiritual science or Unified Physics, whatever you want to call it, is an important subject and needs to be represented in the sphere of social consciousness whether you agree with it or not. There are thriving social media communities of 300,000+ individuals on both The Resonance Project and Hassim Harramein's Facebook pages, and yet Wikipedia via it's ignorant (sorry it's true) editors quickly dismiss as not notable. It's notable enough for 300,000 people to include the information provided by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project in their social media feeds, who are you to dismiss so many people's opinions? 300,000 people think about that. If I gather the neccessary information would you be willing to help me organize it in such a manner as to pass muster of the Wikipedia editorial drones? Best Regards, J `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,369,208

` == Explains everything == ;``I may not respond to any un-civil comments left here`` Well you do like to laud it over your little bit of cyberspace. This site is about information not ``your POV``. Took me all of five minutes to find a reference. Just to prove 1. WP:GF 2. it was not WP:OR. 3. you're a pernicious little bureaucratic type who drives users off this site in droves. Maybe you should stop reverting and do some real contributing? LOL that'll be the day. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

646,371,890

1. correct 2. pertinent 3. done in good faith. So if you are now affronted by my response, it only serves to prove what a thin-skinnned hypocrite you really are.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

646,374,798

I'm not sure that I follow the rationale of your point perhaps you could elaborate on your reasoning?

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

646,396,007

==Semi-major axis== Am I reading that the diameter is 12955759 km (obviously not correct), or is there supposed to be some formatting that I'm missing?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,404,923

Thank you for your reply. I'm not sure what your background is but I'm guessing it's not quantum mechanics or sacred geometry, as neither of which are fringe topics as you describe. Perhaps you should stick to deleting subject matter for which you are more familiar, and i mean that sincerely...we are all on a path learning as we go; me, you, everyone...no judgement. But I do think we should be less zealous in our administration of subjects we are not well versed in, because we tend to miss the subtlety which separates leading edge, from tin-foil-hat illusion. It's always hard to see past our horizons, oftentimes even for those familiar with the subject matter. It's very likely you will look back at this as your Dick Rowe moment when the principles involved here go onto form the basis for technology that will revolutionize the world. And I will be sure to remind you when the time comes so you can benefit from the lesson. Don't feel bad for me, I have no personal stake in this other than recognizing the truth and raising awareness; the real winners will be those who are suffering the most in this world. Mass media, including Wikipedia is much more powerful in influencing reality than you realize, and the small cost of a Wikipedia entry for The Resonance Project and Nassim Haramein would be very helpful in speeding things up, and ultimately cost nothing but tolerance.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

646,409,709

People, scientists and the like, want to know if a result is statistically significant. No one cares about the significance level or critical levels, because most of the time, those levels are fixed. Thus, your point about statistical significance being a consequence of choosing a significance level is a non sequitur. Statistical significance is also consequence of calculating means and standard errors. And in non-parametric cases, in terms of rank. Does that mean we should rename this article in terms of mean differences?

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

646,416,661

The article I will be working on is on [[Economic water scarcity

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

646,432,439

== Better organisational structure == This leadership section would be allot more clear and concise if they were organised like the Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula senior leaders here or the Taliban leaders here: .

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,457,464

== Article clones == This may seem like an odd question, but I don't know any administrators so I got your name from the Wikipedia admin list. My question is this: How can you merge or even delete an article when there are three articles of the same person? 1.)Abdul Rauf Aliza 2.)Abdul Rauf (Taliban governor) 3.)Abdul Rauf (ISIS recruiter) The last two articles should be deleted, as they have the least amount of content in them. How can I do this??

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

646,463,794

` == Proposed merge with Satyender Kumar Jain == Both articles for the same politician. Since Satyender Kumar Jain was created earlier, it should be retained. Thanks '''''' `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

646,467,778

` :WP:BURDEN is with you. '''''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,508,885

`==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:From the Ages/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: · Should have this one to you within a day ☯ ☯ `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

646,534,797

has no life or friends

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,535,567

`OK! Disappointing that you've been outted as not being up for the job. '''''' ::::::::`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

646,535,859

` *Oppose We disambig by the year the film was first released, no matter where that was. '''''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,536,151

` == re: Various questions == Short answer: Yes. Production companies are fine, the distribution ones are a bit of a grey area and are often non-defining. For example, a non-English language film will have different distribution companies in the US/UK. Might be worth raising it at WT:FILM as it's one area I don't do much editing in. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,536,370

` == Bishonen == So are you his lackey or just a sycophant? He's a big boy, shame he has to call on his underlings to do his bidding. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

646,543,021

` :And you are? Let me know when you've crawled out of their arses. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,543,923

`:Hi Paul. For info, I've now added bios for all the shooters at the 1948 Games. I think they're all in the correct categories for living/possibly living, etc. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,544,875

` :Powertrip much? '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,545,157

` ::Have a read of WP:BLOCKNOTPUNITIVE and WP:CIR. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

646,549,965

In my raising it is not an insult to request someone's financial interest in publishing a claim to their veracity or non-bias. Apparently that is not the case in these quarters. Thank you for the lesson.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

646,559,473

` == Would you kindly advise Montanbw that I have requested 3rd party resolution? == I am unable to make an entry on ``Montanabs``'s talk page in order to advise him that I have requested 3rd party resolution of our editing dispute? Thank you. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,561,031

Thank you again for the lesson. People have accused me of threatening and abusive behavior since I raised questions about the invasion of Iraq. Since before that even. I keep hoping I will some day find a tactful way to expose greed and deceit, but it has, alas, continued to elude me. I am heaping ashes on my head.Please forgive me if I have committed lese majeste

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,564,297

`. Years of adversity and meditation have taught me that when people cry ``abuse`` when you ask about money, there is ALWAYS dirty work at the crossroads`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,564,870

Well done, I hope to find time to thank you more fully for your efforts in this area in the future. At the moment I don't have time to look at your diifs but I hope to save that for the morning. Thank you for your contributions which are all appreciated even if you make an error.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

646,568,161

== Events happening in Dublin == Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,568,764

*Oppose. Air forces were unknown prior to 1917. The Austro-Hungarian air force should not be enshrined as the Austro-Hungarian Air Force.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

646,573,530

It doesn't matter; I think I understand what you're trying to teach me, but even if I don't I appreciate your effort, so thanks! I could better explain why I thought you rejected WP:CIVILITY, but that's not important, and I would just be dragging stale diffs into it, which I agree is a distasteful time-sink. If I've misjudged you I sincerely apologize. I'll be more careful about that in the future.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

646,594,341

_______________________________________________________________ Yes yes yes, 094 conducted patrol in 2014 without missiles. The Chinese are so stupid that they can not even make a missile work. Go ahead USA start a nuclear war now with China. You most hated and bitter enemy. They utterly destroyed your economy and is your biggest debt holder. Go ahead USA nuke China, they do not even have a missile that work !!

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

true

646,596,270

== 5 093 are in service. I have backed up my claim with Chinese source which is more crediable than RevolvingPersonalityConduct's US Department of Defense Source. 093 is a Chinese SSN == Hello Iwilsonp, I have added sources to the 093 page. Please protect that page from RevolvingPersonalityConduct. He is an online troll whom repeatedly vandalize Wikipedia pages ! Thank you

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

646,611,996

== Left wing? == If the CEC is inspired and close to the LaRouche movement, it is left wing, nor right wing.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

646,613,657

` ==Similarity to ``Boy Kings``== Section on similarity between this book and The Boy Kings was deleted. The facts in question are easily verified. What was the reason for this deletion? noviceuser Re: the two flags: on notability, the book has received substantial media attention. See, for example, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323342404579081503189753492.html In addition, the author himself is critically acclaimed (see his page). On sources, Amazon is a credible source for the topic in question, the relative contents of two books. The Twitter sources are necessary given that 1. Twitter is the topic being discussed (specifically: discussions on Twitter about the book), and 2. the issue is new and has not yet been written about in mainstream publications. These sources can be improved as additional information and media coverage becomes available which is likely given the high profile of the author, the ongoing media attention to the book, and the fact that The Circle will soon be released. noviceuser :If it's easily verified, it shouldn't be hard to find secondary sources to support it. Agreed, that is a fair point, though it will only be easy to do so if sufficient time has passed for secondary sources to pick up on it which they haven't yet. It was only a matter of hours ago that the alleged victim of plagiarism was made aware of the details of the book in question (The Circle) and therefore able to point out the similarities. In the coming days it is likely to receive more attention. The female author in question has upward of 1,500 Twitter followers and a well-received book on Amazon and the other comments on Twitter corroborating her interpretation also come from prominent Tweeters. While I am a Wikipedia novice, it does not seem that this is an unusually suspect story to report in somewhat-real-time versus other pages that are rapidly updated, and to reiterate, it is very obvious from reading the respective Amazon pages that there are myriad similarities between the books and it is only a matter of time before this is picked up. noviceuser Update: a secondary source is now available. Updating accordingly. noviceuser :I see your edit was removed by a bot. I don't think it's impossible that there might surface secondary sources to support this part of the article, but these aren't them. Tweets are generally considered unsuitable, which is why bots remove them. And that Medium post isn't a suitable source either. 1) it's written by the person who is theoretically the aggrieved party in this case, 2) Medium is basically a self-publishing platform, like Livejournal, and doesn't really qualify as a secondary source, especially in the case of a potentially contentious allegation like this. Let's not let this plagiarism flap stand in the way of making this a better article. It could use a lot of improvement. My personal opinion is that the plagiarism claim (which amounts to ``I wrote a book about a woman hired by a social networking firm, and any similar books are plagiarism``) should not be included in the article anyway, in the absence of a lawsuit or settlement. So let's get some interesting stuff about the book in there. For one thing, Margaret Atwood reviewed the book at length. Eric`

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

646,619,895

` :I have made no such threat, via email, or any other method. JPE is unhappy with his recent block at WP:3RR. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

646,620,021

` :It's OK folks, FreeRangeFrog is clearly making up for an inadequacy in their own life and needs to do what they did. Nice to see all the old glory hunters returning en-masse. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

646,621,889

Were that true you would not be uttering a fantastic story about the BBC cooking up lies to make it seem to be so.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,626,163

` As to your claim that true American Appaloosa breeding stock is plentiful with an adequate gene pool, this.... ``During the Depression years, interest in the breed revived and the few surviving horses were used to create the foundation of the breed. The Appaloosa Horse club was created in 1938. Since then, the Appaloosa Horse has become the third largest breed registry in the world.`` Meet the Appaloosa,By Katherine Blocksdorf,Horses Expert So now tell me how you went from a few surviving horses to the third largest breed registry without inbreeding. And then tell me why you are so adamantly opposed to adding genes from this newly found Krygyz stock instead of arabians and quarter horses. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,627,052

:This lying piece of Communist garbage should feel neither comfortable nor safe.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

646,627,076

` :::I like to know where I stand when someone makes a false accusation against me. '''''' `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

646,627,389

` ::Jesus, this guy really is a piece of shit isn't he? What kind of state is Western civilisation in when garbage like this is allowed anywhere near academia? ::It's always the same ``fringe`` lie. He learned to parrot it from Rubenstein. Have you read WD Hamilton's review? ::You are just a liar Maunus. You are a disgusting, worthless person. ::``the only favorable ones are by people who are obviously their comrades-in-arms`` ::``comrades-in-arms`` being people who agree with the reasoning? How convenient. Who's the comrade shithead? `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

646,636,582

` == Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself == Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social-networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST: ``Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account.`` The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

646,639,835

` == Edit disagreements == #Where are you getting the figure range for '300-3000' from? I couldn't find these figures in any of the sources you cited, unless you're estimating based on predictions from the article. #Abu Omar al-Shishani is not the chief in command of both Iraq and Syria. This is ridiculous. I don't know why so many people believe this. I suspect it might be becuase he is so prevalent in the IS propaganda that he is somehow the Islamic State's version of Napoleon Bonaparte. I cannot find any reputable source claiming he is anything more than a field commander in northern Syria. He doesn't even feature in any IS leadership hierarchies, which are almost exclusively staffed by Iraqis who have been in the organisations since the early-mid 2000's. When the former commander of the IS Military Council passed away in June 2014 (Abu Abdulrahman al-Bilawi), Iraqi secutyi forces found some memory sticks and a laptop containing the following leadership information currently pieced together by western analysts. Note how al-Shishani doesn't feature in any of them, save one which turned out to be incorrect. Here they are: , , . Here is the false one which showed al-Shishani succeeding al-Bilawi as the IS military chief of the Military Shura: . However, it was Abu Ayman al-Iraqi, another IS Iraqi commander who had been in the organisation years before al-Shishani had joined who succeeded al-Bilawi as the Chief of the Military Shura. He is shown in the graph as Adnan Latif Hamid al-Sweidawi which is his real name. You never see the upper echelons of the IS hierarchy, the ones who actually control everything. They are not shown in IS propaganda. They are clandestine, mysterious, shadowy figures. Only the pawns are revealed. #You keep stating that Jamaat-ul-Ahrar have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State. This is just not true. You might get this impression becuase they broke away from the TTP or the Pakistani Taliban, which swear allegiance to the head of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Omar. But the spokesperson for Jamaat-ul-Ahrar stated that they pledged allegiance to the Taliban leader . The leader of Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, Omar Khalid has strong ties to Ayman al-Zawahiri and Al-Qaeda, a nemesis to the Islamic State. #You state that Abu Sayyaf have sworn allegiance to the Islamic State, however, the man who swore allegiance to them is not the groups leader, so it is unclear whether or not he is representing Abu Sayyaf or a splinter faction. #You write that Ansar al-Islam is an Al-Qaeda affiliate, but I can find little to no proof affirming this position. The leadership of Ansar al-Islam have rejected the notion that they swear allegiance to al-Qaeda, despite collaborating with their affiliates, such as the al-Nusra Front.U.S. terrorism expert Rohan Gunaratna in January 2003 however disagreed with Krekar and affirmed links of Ansar with al-Qaeda: “Ansar al-Islam has links with al-Qaeda – in fact it is an associate group of al-Qaeda”.]. The U.S Defense Intelligence Agency seemed to have affirmed this when they wrote ``Ansar al-Islam is an independent organization that receives assistance from al-Qaeda, but is not a branch of the group.``DIA, Special Analysis, July 31, 2002, cited in Postwar Findings about Iraq's WMD Programs and Links to Terrorism and How they Compare with Prewar Assessments, pg. 71.`

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

646,640,843

:This is the source for Barqah, Sinai and Algeria Province of the Islamic State: . Are you telling me that the British Broadcasting Corporation are no more reliable than the onion news network..? Furthermore, the burden of proof for me has been proven by this cited source which identifies the logos as being the representations of the Provinces. The only way to disprove this is to find a source which is contradictory.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,641,915

Islamic State dating back to al-Qaeda in Iraq in

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

646,645,169

::: So does this mean I have been Wiki-vanquished?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,689,506

` The question at hand is whether these are true facts that are pertinent to this Wikipedia page and thus deserve to be judged by the people who read it. This is, after all, a page in the Wikipedia and not your personal property. Is that not so? These facts are as follows: 1) Substantial numbers of horses which show many characteristics of purebred Appaloosas have been found in 2014 living in a remote mountain valley of Kyrgyzstan near the Chinese border. These horses exhibit spots, white sclerae, and striped hooves. 2) a DNA analysis conducted by Dr. Gus Cothran at Texas A & M University shows that these Kyrgyzstan horses closely match purebred American Appaloosas in their genetics. 3) As of 2015, controversy exists as to whether these horses should be considered true Appaloosas. A BBC documentary shows the 69-year-old female New Zealand Appaloosa breeder who rode horseback over a 13,777 foot mountain pass to find these horses. This documentary clearly shows these horses in their native milieu and discusses the DNA evidence. Now Mr. Montanabw Sir, are those facts not true? Are they not germane? People come to this Wikipedia Appaloosa page to learn current and pertinent facts about Appaloosas. In that context neither your opinion nor mine count for a plug nickel. Therefore I will now repeat my question . Exactly why are you continuing to refuse the addition of these facts to this Wikipedia page? If you wish, I don't see why an additional section cannot be added entitled ``Kyrgyzstan horse controversy`` containing this information. Can you? Because if we can't resolve this question here, that is the issue I am going to ask the next level to resolve. I will not ask them to decide about LP genes or whether the BBC has made up some fairy story about the Appaloosa or whether the moon is made of green cheese. I will ask them whether you are in your legitimate rights to deny the inclusion of this information to the Wikipedia readers. Am I speaking clearly enough, Mister? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,696,117

` As we are apparently at an impasse over this question, I will set aside tomorrow to ask for third party resolution. As to your theory of your ``right`` to suppress these facts, I don't give two cents for your words after that ignorant, preposterous, country bumpkin lie of yours about the BBC broadcasting lies in their story so they can drum up viewers like Fox news does. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,700,470

` I watched that show ( Secret Horse: The quest for the true Appaloosa) and the end credits clearly stated ``Copyright BBC MMXV``. You would have seen that too if you had actually seen it - as opposed to talking through your hat. The lies of you ``honest men`` are lame, preposterous, and tedious in the extreme. :British horse lovers are a substantial portion of BBC viewers and would never have stood for that manky nonsense you so blithely accuse them of. That is a reality well known to the BBC - even if it hasn't soaked into the Red state boondocks. Sorry indeed. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,723,041

` == Reverting for no reason == Hi. I see you undid edits I made, with the summary ``http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=From_The_Doctor_to_my_son_Thomas&diff;=646666152&oldid;=646565498 keep approp formatting from WP:GA version]. As I'm sure you're aware, that is an entirely meaningless edit summary. It was not formatting that I changed, and the fact that an article has a little green cross does not mean that it cannot be improved. So, if you had an actual reason for the revert, please state what it is. If you didn't, then please don't do that again. You're damaging the encyclopaedia. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

646,730,263

==Arizona== Yes Tony, that is an uncanny resemblance! In addition to the overall shape, dimension and coastline contour...here's about ten details that match!

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

646,735,356

` ==The SPÖ in Mein Kampf== At one moment Hitler lauded the Social Democratic Party in his mind (Friedrich Austerlitz, Anton David, Viktor Adler and Wilhelm Ellenbogen are mentioned by their last names on p. 66 of Mein Kampf) for championing ``das allgemeine und geheime Wahlrecht`` (Mein Kampf, p. 39) or universal suffrage, saying to himself that this must lead to a weakening of Habsburg monarchic rule. When he later saw more of what the party was about however, he suggested its members were disfavoring Germans in an attempt to save the multiethnic melting pot of Austria-Hungary. It appears he was pressured to join the trade union and that men of Jewish heritage were influential in the party (Mein Kampf, pgs. 39, 40, 65 and 66).Mein Kampf, Erster Band, 2. Kapitel `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,735,561

angered that he was asked

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

646,740,615

:GA doesn't imply a final endorsement of the article contents. The quotes are present in the text, and it is entirely pointless to duplicate them in boxes. Why do you think they are necessary?

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false