dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
664,105,460	== Get A Life! == l00zer	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
664,108,986	No problem, however only the UEFA EUROPA LEAGUE trophy and the INTERCONTINETAL trophy works. The CHAMPIONS LEAGUE and the INTERTOTO trophies do not take me to the same page the other two do, which does not let me use the picture file to add. If you want these added you must find the wiki page in English that takes me to a similar formatted page like the europa league trophy so I can use the picture file. Thanks.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,109,331	: They were deleted by	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,114,405	::: Fair enough, at least you are asking for more input.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,120,161	` == This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2015) == {\| style=``width:100%; padding:2px;`` ! Hello, Northamerica1000. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Previous selections: • • Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: using on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • \|} `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
664,120,606	`::::: Sorry, but you're incorrect in your understanding of primary vs. secondary sources. Nonetheless, though Dunlap & McCright have written primary source material, their chapter in the Oxford Handbook is a secondary source - it ``talks about...primary source[s]`` (some of which happen to be their own, some not). It doesn't present primary research findings, it discusses previous findings. Anyway, that's one of the three sources I discussed. Does that mean that you agree on Farmer & Cook and Robert Manne? Or not? Let's sort through these sources properly. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
664,127,767	` :This article is about the first book, and the first book only calls her ``Janet Way``. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
664,132,486	== Roles and awards == Thanks for . I'd just managed to block out that debacle. I'm disappointed to see the articles for the roles and awards of John Gielgud, Ian McKellen, Kangana Ranaut and Ralph Richardson retain that apocryphal comma in the titles—and worse, that it's spread to Patrick Stewart, Vijay and Arshad Warsi—but there's no reasoning with some people. —''''''	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
664,140,531	` :::::This one has been done to death as well. And this time, I can find the discussion. It is here. This was an administrators' noticeboard complaint raised because a single editor was being regarded by many as being disruptive because he routinely deleted anything from any article that he routinely patrolled that was uncited. This applied to both contentious meterial as well as the blatantly obvious. And he is still very active in this pursuit. The outcome was that he was perfectly within his rights to do so. Any claim in any article that is simply deleted as unreferenced or tagged as {{citation needed}} has, by definition, been challenged and so the ``... unlikely to be challenged ...`` caveat no longer applies. If the meterial was deleted, then anyone restoring it is obliged to provide the reference or they can be held to be edit warring. :::::Until the appearance of this editor, I had long held the view that it was common courtesy to tag a contentious point before deleting it (if no acceptable reference was forthcoming within a reasonable time). I personally still hold that view, but the outcome was that any editor is free to delete any material from any article that is not supported by a reference without giving any notice whatsoever. :::::Please also note: that the fact that other articles do not conform to WP:LEDE is not a valid reason as to why this one should not conform either (WP:OSE). If I had the time, I would thank KDS4444 for his helpful list of other articles; move the list of brand names to the main body (WP:LEDE) assuming they were properly referenced and remove the bolding (MOS:BOLD). `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
664,142,429	` Oh, and by the way, there is a clear line between ``vandalism`` and adding common knowledge. They may be unsourced - but they are not promotion, soapboxing, or vandalism. Get a dictionary.`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,144,293	== Reported for blocking == I just reported you for personal attacks and threats. Go take that high and mighty attitude somewhere else.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,144,839	Sorry, but server history states that you proceeded to harrass me first - with threats of blocking under false pretenses. Sorry, but legally, you lose with such evidences. Even if you are an established editor, a big ego won't get you anywhere.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,145,061	I have retained all the evidences to show it in your face.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,146,783	Sorry but I won't back down from your harrassments. This user reverts all my edits and reports me for vandalism. Get a dictionary and get your definition of harrasment straight.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,147,164	That's a rather feeble premise to argue showing an excessive number of photos prominently showing 24 different women's vaginas, compared to one human male penis 3/4 of the way down the page on the equivalent article for male genitalia. This demonstrates the overwhelming male bias in editorial content on Wikipedia.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
664,147,746	Sorry but I've tried asking why I was warned. All I got was a rude response, numeroues reversed edits even legit ones, another blocking warning. I provide genres for song without or erroneous ones. Some are sourced and some are not. But IndianBIO is reverting all my sourced edits and accuses me of cases such as vandalizing, soapboxing, and advertising. Technically, it's libel, and I can report you all for it.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,147,913	And this page is all I need as evidence.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
664,148,371	Please visit Style (Taylor Swift song).	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,150,561	` Sorry, I counterchecked the source for the genre ``synthpop`` but it is nowhere stated in the given source. ``Electropop`` on the otherhand was clearly stated to be associated with the subject. Is that vandalism? As for Bad Blood, another user removed my sources, and then I was accused of vandalism when I edited it again. Sorry, if you have no common sense, it's a hip-hop song cited in numerous hip-hop websites. My source was removed - is that vandalism for you, or is an attck on a non established editor providing well-intended information. You know what vandalism is? I change the song's name to a different one, or a derogatory or a mocking term. All I did was add genres. I may accept the term unsourced edits, but vandalism is a serious term you may not understand.`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,170,159	` == Blocked == This username has been blocked for being promotional, as evidenced by the content that it tried to add to this project. You are welcome to register for a new account if you would like to contribute to this project in a positive manner. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
664,182,537	` :Okay, first of all, both of you, I don't see any ``inappropriate`` edits in my recent contributions other than me thanking you both and various others for helping me. Maybe I did acknowledge that was in a fight recently, but I only thanked him for defending me and was not in any way trying to restart a war of any kind: I'm too humanitarian for that. One user I talked to warned me already that this isn't Facebook, and I respect that. I can also respect you Medeis not taking me as a sincere person if I you can't be my friend, not everybody can be my friend. But see this: you can't lie to me. I never contacted Materialscientist in any way and neither have I used any ``scare tactics`` against him. I don't even know who he is or what's he's done, I've seen him mentioned only in the Speed of Light article I improved. If anything you Medeis are trying to terrorize me for things you disagree with, threatening me with shutdown. You make me uncomfortable. You aren't being productive. Wikipedia isn't about these kinds of arguments were having, it's about learning. :Second, I was working gathering my sources with an article in Denmark while in the meantime improving these articles. However, you Medeis with your one-sided rivalry blame me of terrorizing the Wikipedia community, blatantly lying about my actions and destroying my reputation. I don't know what part you have in this, , but you, of course, inform me more than this other administrator. I'm not trying to insult anyone, remember that. But back to you, Medeis, your outrageous lies about me are by themselves an insult, and because I'm getting uncooperative administrators treating their editors this way I see no reason for continuing my improvements on Wikipedia. :Jimmy Wales would never approve of any of the violence occurring in Wikipedia. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
664,187,971	::: I have completely changed my mind and will DEFINITELY NOT do any vandalism at all, therefore there is not the slightest need to do any semi protection. I give you my word.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
664,188,061	:I'M REALLY FUCKING SCARED	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
664,188,858	(UTC) :::: Critics of anything are by definition reviewing the primary thing. Thus any critic is a secondary source. 22:49, 26 May 2015	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
664,206,009	:::::Politely asking you a question is not a personal attack here at wikipedia. Cheers!	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,206,251	:::::::btw, I notice that you did not answer said question. Cheers!	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,206,892	::::::::There certainly is no consensus to reinstate the iformation that is a blatant WP:BLP issue. Cheers!	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,211,094	:::::Exactly and . Thank you to you both for your input in this discussion. Cheers!	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,214,261	:::::::::Exactly . Again, I thank you for your input and explanation of wikipedia policies and guidelines. Cheers!	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,222,353	:::::: If signing had anything to do at all with timestamps, there would be no separate three tilde syntax for untimestamped signing. Clearly, signing without timestamping is a perfectly fine thing if developers have thought about it. Also, how kind of you to consider SineBot one of 'you' at whom I supposedly swear. For SineBot was literally the only 'person' in this talk page that I used an expressive word towards. ~~~~	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
664,227,162	Oh, and also regarding signatures. I find it quite funny what while comments of both signing bots use a smaller font, the signatures of both proponents of signing in this section are coloured and bolded. I have yet to see an editor with a small, unassuming, non-disruptive signature that doesn't draw attention to itself, like, oh, let me come up with an example, Username ✉ ✎ (the choice of symbols might not yet be perfect). ~~~~	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
664,256,482	`:::``Unprotection: There is no BLP violation, as it is covered in reliable sources. This semi-protection appears to be an attempt to quash the talkapge consensus to include it, by preventing the IP user from editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 4:40 am, Today (UTC−5)`` See here: This posting is both uncivil and a personal attack on a specific editor suggesting that someone was attempting to ``squash`` talkpage consensus. The posting is also in violation of WP:AGF. An editor who has only been on wikipedia for five months is hardly a regular. If you continue all of your disruptive posts and behaviours I will be presenting this disruption that you have caused at WP:ANI. So please do read up on WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, and WP:DISRUPTION. Cheers! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
664,259,122	== Omissions == This article does not live up to its name. For example where do I find Studebaker cars built prior to 1918? Where are all those carriages and wagons?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,267,062	:::Thanks I was having some browser issues. Sorry for any inconvenience. Cheers!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,269,057	GET OFF OF WIKIPEDIA, YOU WALNUT-PANELED IDIOT!!! YOU WOULDN'T KNOW A GOOD SCHEDULE IF IT PUT CLAMPS ON YOUR TESTICLES!!!	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
664,274,371	:I have often wondered why planet infoboxes like Earth show radius instead of diameter. For Joe Q. Public I have always thought diameter would be assumed by a casual reader.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,287,689	Hayes mods, 1952== Avery, (previously cited), pages 138 & 139 discusses the Hayes mods and the exhaust collectors specifically in listing at lower case I ,semi collector ring. ==	2,015	false	article	random	test	false
664,297,540	` == Self-Healing Materials == Dear Winner 42, I am contacting you in response to the Articles for Creation: Self-Healing Materials rejection as of may 13th. The background of the effort to write this Wikipedia contribution: We are a group of 15 PhD fellows all working together in the EU Marie-Curie Research Training network on ``Self-Healing Materials - from Concepts to Market``, covering various material classes that are designed for an increased sustainability by providing a strategy for self-repair. This is an active area of materials research and currently the first examples of materials with improved self-repair find their way into application. During one of our last meetings we found that the existing Wikipedia Article on ``Self-Healing Materials`` covers only a very small area of the existing material classes: it is indeed concentrated on polymers only. However, there a far more classes of materials that are currently developed for self-healing capability. As such, we combined our efforts to write an article that covers more classes of materials, including ceramics, metals, asphalt, concrete, composites, ... Our suggestion is the following: The existing page is actually a quite nice sum up for Self-Healing Polymers and should be renamed accordingly. Simultaneously, the new article can be uploaded as ``Self-Healing Materials`` and will contain also a link on the page more specializing on the polymer aspect. What do you think? `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
664,306,309	== Please refrain from == people for the fact that other editors have derailed their relevant comment regarding the article into irrelevant subjects such as signing posts. Oh, and also, Wikipedia's supposed 'gender gap' will never ever be closed no matter how much money is thrown at it, and 'inherent cultural bias' is a contradiction. ~~~~	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
664,307,608	== Wow == You're one of those guys whose idea of contribution is retribution by deleting others' comments, aren't you. Figures. The 'gender gap' will never be closed unless Wikipedia becomes a place for women to gossip and socialize with each other on. The only 'cultural bias' Wikipedia has is that it is 'biased' towards objectively important subjects such as science, which coincidentally happen to be those pursued until recently by the Western society, which incidentally has always been the only culture around at all. The 'undue coverage of women' comes from the fact that there are less notable women. Insisting on 'equal coverage' of women and men will result in unequal proportion of notable and non-notable people. The policies supposed to make the place more accessible to women, such as ill-conceived politeness, will only result in making it less accessible to people who only care about getting the fucking job done. ~~~~	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
664,307,988	(UTC) ==Inserting citations== Hi Ariel, here is the code now: http://angielittlefield.com/ebooks/TomThomsonTorontoNeighbourhoods.pdf Indeed, Thomson painted a number of watercolours between 1904 and 1909.http://www.tomthomsoncatalogue.org/catalogue/index.php?pageNum=0 okay step one is erase the two cn tags step two - in front of the http insert thus step three - athe end of the url ref put this I will go correct the first one. Then please you try correcting the second one, and I am sure you will go perfect! The article is shaping up quite well! Congrats. Please ask any questions here, and I will answer them for you. You may also email me from the link at the top of my talk page, or you can also post a note on my talk page. I am glad to help! I really enjoy collaborating with other editors! Just ask! Cheers! 18:39, 27 May 2015	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,308,455	== Wow == You know, when this gets me blocked/banned/whatever, we will both get something out of it. You will have another 'proof' at your disposal how feminists (or possibly women, but I think you are a male) are 'relentlessly harassed' on Wikipedia, which you will be able to then use for your political and ideological agenda, and I'll be amused by the fact that in every piece of my 'harassment', I actually made a good point about something.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
664,309,453	== Suggested change of wording to Template:Uw-harass4 == In line with the most recent findings of the feminist school of criminology, I suggest that a more accurate phrasing should be, instead of 'harass', 'the next time you purposefully and blatantly RAAAAAAPE!!! a fellow Wikipedian'. ~~~~	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
664,324,583	::...and In Kafr has 494 inhabitants...pretty much half-way between Kafr Ein`s 1922 number (=376) and 1945 number (=550).....I think we have a winner! Thanks..	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
664,326,218	` == North Sea Empire and Angevins == This piece of text was removed and then restored to the artricle: ``In the early 11th century, England became part of the ``North Sea Empire`` of Cnut the Great. With the Norman conquest, the kingdom became one of the territories ruled by the House of Anjou``. The North Sea Empire was a personal union between 3 countries that lasted about fifteen or so years (reign of Canute the Great). If it is to be mentioned it shouldn't look like it lasted until the Norman conquest. The second part of the text is plain wrong. The Normans weren't Angevins. And for parts of their reign over England they didn't rule over Normandy, let alone other territories. I'll rewrite a little and remove a little. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
664,340,428	` Since nobody has thought it necessary to post a count before concluding the deletion request, I'll do it. :Keep: 5 :Merge all: 2 :Merge, but keep some:7 :Delete: 0 This means that the original deletion request was rejected. I want to thank everybody for this unanimous vote, because it attests that my contributions were valid. Actually this appeared quite clear from the start as even the originator of the request, , has never cast a vote for deletion. His vote is Merge, but keep some. Thus remains the question why the deletion request was filed at all. I think that had every right to question the utility of the pages created. He was also right trying to influence the further development of the project. There is an instrument on Wikipedia to do that. It is called Talk page. However he decided on another instrument without ever contacting me and this gave a number of people, who had never taken any interest in the argument, the power to interfere. What followed has been called a ``mess`` by and I would rather agree with his definition. More precisely, I'd tend to call the procedure an abuse, since it has been wielded to install a kind of preventive democratic control over how users have to submit their contributions to Wikipedia, which is certainly not the purpose of a deletion request. According to the spirit of the compromise reached and to judge from the messages posted on the single talk pages, it is now in the competence of the admins to decide which articles on ancient athletes are permitted, how many and why. Thus everything has been burocraticized and as a consequence the whole area of research has been transformed into a minefield. So who would ever touch it again? This approach hasn't worked in the past and it never will. Probably these power plays are also among the motives for the loss of so many valid editors whose enthusiasm must have vanished for a reason. As long as these stupid games have the better, I'm afraid the future looks bleak. Wikipedia can only survive as a free encyclopedia and today we have lost some of that freedom. After many words, here is the body count of today's battle: This user has stopped contributing to Wikipedia. What I leave on the field is a rudimentary list of Olympic winners, thirty-five marginal articles with a merge tag and an incomplete calendar which is currently displayed on 776 pages and should have been expanded to 400 more. Maybe the users wielding paragraphs and guidelines will take care of the completion of these projects, but from what I've seen I'm not very optimistic. Thanks everybody for watching. Good bye.`	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
664,345,633	` == Hi Bbb23 I need your help and some advice about possible sockpuppetry == Hi Bbb23, I need your help and some advice about possible sockpuppetry. I am also going to ping @PBS so that he may have advice as well, or if you are really busy just now. There has been ongoing disputes, edit warring, blatant blp issues, NPA's up to like 3 now from one certain editor.in and around the article for a pianist here at en wikipedia, as well as the blp board, edit warring boards (reports by two different editors about the same James Rhodes (pianist) article, page protection board, where @CambridgeBayWeather saw all the blp issuesthat were going on at the time she judged the need for protection there at the pianist article. in her admin role semi-protected the article for one week, then there were three WP:NPA violations against him, which I warned the editor on his talk page on two occasions. Since then the editor has struck up a whole band of possible sock monkeys to help defend him, and also some of the ones have made personal attacks againt me as well in the ani the editor filed. I have been trying to state what has actually happened over this while, but there is so much disruption, attacking, and lacking good faith by him and some others there. I just got to thinking this is so weird. All the possible soccy editors seemed to be acting in concert in how the flow of things went there so far. I just kept my thoughts about all this to myself until now, but it occurred to me to check the block log of this editor to see if he had ever had any trouble with issues that he may have been blocked for. I asked him about the two blocks listed in the report. One block was for 72 hours and the next block was an INdeffinent. block. I noticed the offenses listed was sock puppeting and abusing multiple accounts. When I asked him about the sockpuppetry charge in the ani, he said something to the effect that ``he was testing wikipedias security`` by ``setting up some vandalism only accounts`` to test security. You could read his exact storyline that he posted on there. Are editors allowed to ``test security`` by making up sockpuppets to vandalize editors, articles and such? Is he really working for you as a clerk or something? To paraphrase, he said at ani it was just a couple of accounts, maybe 2 just to test with. I took his word on that for awhile, but then I took a break from making new articles, to just try typing his editor name and sockpuppet in wp search. This is what I found, it had your name on it so I thought you would be the perfect person to explain to me how this works exactly. [title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gabucho181/Archive&oldid;=663847791] Maybe I am not reading the pages and archives correctly since I do not follow the spi reports very often. I see people speak of a duck rule, and or diffs of evidence is needed to request an investigation. I do not know myself is all this meets the duck rule or if there is any real evidence that this user may be continuing to abuse multi accounts or not, But I was stunned to se reports on his archive go back to januaey and the latest one was around may 18. Could you read this over if you have time to see if it warrants asking for all this to be checked on. I do not know how to do a spi report. I am not sure if it can be added on to the ongoing list that goes back several months? Please look it over and let me know something. I am going to work offline on my new article sets tonight, and upload them tomorrow or the next day. I have been doing a series of articles about different writers around the world, and then I make a few stubs from red links in the one about the writer. This is all very discouraging. Thank you. Cheers! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,349,091	` *Merge. I understand that the subject of this article has had more written about him than the others previously nominated but I wouldn't call it significant enough coverage to warrant a standalone article. Keep in mind that I have no prejudice against simply copy-pasting the information on this page to a list article. — `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
664,357,317	WV, go away for 24 hours like you offered, spare us your nonsensical obstruction, and you'll come back and find the grownups will have a respectable conversation without you. Your obstructionist behavior is noisome.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,358,249	:::* Your complaint here WV assumes that the sections will moved without appropriate revisions to the content. The article needs revising, and a comprehensive article will reflect that. The reorganization is just a first step.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,360,304	:::Thanks so much for your help and advice! Cheers!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,361,531	` :::@Roboskiye: we deal in facts here, not personal accusations and attacks. Please state why your edit is justified and why the other editors' edits were unjustified, citing appropriate sources. • `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
664,364,033	`It seems you have some issues with confronting your own psychological conditioning, and you're right I hardly know you at all. Thank you, genuinely, for your help on the Origins of the Six-day war dubiousness re-phrasing, in addition, or perhaps more specifically; coincidentally, in the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Origins_of_the_Six-Day_War#Nasser_steps_made_the_war_inevitable there is a nice chart during the wonderful work that is shown to keep the statement as it was (the blame), however the work he cites ``-See Maoz p. 98 ``The existing literature...most of the blame for the outbreak of the war is placed on Nasser and the Egyptian decision making process`` shows it as 'most' and then later on in the chart he uses the word 'most' again. this would also be an appropriate word come to think of it it may be better, although it is not my specialty and 'some' is already more precise than 'the' as it cannot be confused with the other uses of 'the' that imply unique-ness or a soleness of existence. Also this may belong in a different part of Wikipedia, although considering as it is regarding the dubiousness that comes about as a result of the form these ideas are expressed in, it doesn't seem to fit into the 'nassar talks made war inevitable' section of the talk page on Origins of Six-Day. `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
664,384,503	: Whilst your response makes me chuckle, I'm sure you understand the fallaciousness of your argument as one is considerably more acheivable than the other (and I suspect I am more dedicated as well)	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
664,386,649	(Search Engine) Sanook is a very popular Thai search engine, and also there is a Sanook page in Thai (Thai script).	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
664,405,008	I detest opaqueness masquerading as civility. Frankness will get you the furthest with me.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
664,418,857	== PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE == JUST GET RID OF MY ACCOUNT ALREADY	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
664,422,105	` : I think this is all rather scholastic. The name is admittedly imperfect due to the fact that the article essentially catalogues very recent (by the standards of any encyclopedia) and ongoing events. But the term could be justified: the number 2 therein implies a clear reference to THE Cold War, which evokes unmistakable associations, the prime one being the rivalry exactly between Russia (the USSR) and the US for the global dominance (to put it bluntly). And not just some highly localised and geopolitically irrelevant (unless you watch CNN claptrap on a daily basis) squabble somewhere in the Near East. Russia is the only state that not merely defies the US, but challenges the entire status quo as established post-Cold War, as is clear from Putin's quotes cited in the Background section. There is every sign that he is determined to achieve at least what the USSR had, i.e. dominance over half of the Continental Europe, or to go nuclear in a very literal sense of the term, i.e. obliterating the centres of Western civilisation. This is almost official now. Thus, at the end of the day, Yes, it is about the US vs the RF, as the US is the only military force in NATO to speak of. But the implications thereof are very broad, the phenomenon is nascent, therefore separate article is warranted, I think. We do not know as of now how it is to evolve: it may very well be the case, the appropriate title in a few months will be ``THE RUN-UP TO WORLD WAR III``. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,431,911	` :::There are not any. WP:NONENG has to do with the verifiability of foreign language sources such that they are usable and allows the usage of translation which again you seem to fail to note indicated ``Movies``. Where do you have your English language sources to determine that it is Disney Cinema? None, as you use a Google link that only pulls up French language articles. Official names are not automatically used at WP per Wikipedia:Official names. Using Movies instead of Cinema is consistent with the other alternative Disney Cinemagic alternative channels as point out before. So to a certain extent the sources for those channels' name are indirectly are the English language sources for the selected translation. Again ``Cinema`` is acknowledged as a possibility in the actual table entry for that channel. But you seen to fail to care and/or look and continue to beat a dead horse. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
664,432,407	` :::* unless you can point to a policy that says ``Major contributions`` is inherently POV then your crusade is ignorable. The man changed economics, mathematics, computers, evolutionary biology, business, war, politics, and diplomacy with a few brief papers...several reliable sources which can and will be used to interpret his works establish that. That, with the spectre of understatement, is a major contribution to those fields and the twentieth century. Until you establish it's inherent bias and a relevant policy interpretation held by the wider consensus of Wikipedia users, you're opinion is just an opinion, and an ill-informed one. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,433,499	== why are you such an idiot? == ?	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
664,438,975	== I didn't vandalize that article! == I was undoing vandalism by that IP!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,440,848	` Sure ) I didn't add ``derpyday``, I think the IP did it, reverted it, but I accidentally reverted it back in. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,440,976	` I didn't add ``derpyday``, I think the IP did it, reverted it, but I accidentally reverted it back in. Thanks for cleaning it up! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
664,441,818	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Barnstar of Diplomacy \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Thanks for resolving the ``derpyday`` issue! \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,449,296	The star HIP 85605 has very poorly determined data and is more marketing hype than science.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
664,459,340	` ::Again: Why can't you just wait? `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
664,473,486	`:: You appear not to understand Courtier's Reply. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
664,480,773	Include where? I added them to my watchlist now.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
664,481,863	* All the television reports mentioned that they did not wear seatbelts. If it's not in the print news coverage, I'd be rather surprised. Did you check nj.com?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,482,088	These have mentions of it: .	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,482,784	` *Comment I moved this page to ``Surface (first generation)`` per WP:ORDINAL before noticing this discussion. The Surface Pro article should be moved to Surface Pro (first generation) to avoid ambiguity. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
664,496,424	mmmm i love them. Also i go to mcdonalds a lot. I like their hamburgers. Especially their big fattie lard ones. They make me even more hungry. Then I got to Burger King. One day I was talking to the king. Suddenly I looked over at him and I saw him as a big juicy hamburger. I got hungry. I then proceeded to eat him.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,497,060	::::You're right - contradictory spaces/nospaces spellings of the foundation have been left in during all the back-and-forths. Sigh. As for why it's styled that way, why is iPod styled that way? Why is FairPoint Communications styled that way? They just are. -	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
664,497,416	Aloha Calidam, are you Hawaiian ? IT IS CLEAR BY YOUR REMOVAL THAT YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH MY ADDITIONS which are facts and proven truth, AND YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE PART OF THE ONGOING TREASON TO ENSLAVE THE PEOPLE. To find out and determine what action needs to be taken, I will send private E-mail for investigation. Please let us reason together so we can best serve the enslaved. Welton	2,015	false	user	random	train	false
664,525,074	* The article on Dilemma of determinism is not mine, it seems to have been written by somebody knowledgeable in philosophy or at least somebody who read a lot of books on the topic. I prefer another version thereof: . Please note that both the Hume's passes and the James' lecture were precisely on this topic (analysing of human freedom in terms of necessity and chance and discussing the argument of whether there can be any freedom when using such dichotomy; such chance/necessity analysis was also done by Schopenhauer and the argument was used by many modern philosophers, see the archival article from my link).	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
664,525,469	` * The present state of the description of Pereboom's views is a joke. The old article on the Dilemma of determinism explained it better: (quote from Pereboom) ``As has often been pointed out, such random physical events are no more within our control than are causally determined physical events, and thus, we can no more be morally responsible for them than, in the indeterminist opinion, we can be for events that are causally determined.`` The whole dichotomistic argument (i.e. the one basing on the analysis of the extent of determinism and lack of determinism, here aptly called randomness) is missing in this version of Free will. That's why an edit like mine should be included. If you dislike mine, please suggest which words should be changed and what is the wording that you can accept. I guess an admin sold this topic for cash so I am now more careful editing. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,525,920	or even owner – who knows who exactly –	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,526,507	***No, sorry, I live in Poland and don't read books in English, especially little known ones. How could I have got to know them? If I saw them in a book store, I would buy translated ones. Piotr Nizynski	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
664,526,568	(you can find my blog easily)	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
664,531,105	== Unnotable ozzies == Stop creating articles on Australians nobody's ever heard of! You are driving randykitty crazy! She's dropping fur all over the place!!	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
664,554,847	mind yo damn buisness	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,554,974	yo man you wanna fight im ready anytime.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
664,555,073	henry lee lucas was my dad im pretty sure i know the information better than you do.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,555,230	yo i got me a gun ill shoot u	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
664,555,298	quit bein a bitch and talk to me	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
664,556,013	yo bitch you think you can get rid of me im black	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
664,574,740	== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,574,921	== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins (so that there is no single common name for the famous argument now, in the whole literate Earth) but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
664,575,480	== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins (so that there is no single common name for the famous argument now, in the whole literate Earth) but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
664,575,635	== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins (so that there is no longer a single common name for the famous argument now, in the whole literate Earth) but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
664,588,904	:::::::::I know, and as I told, I am politically syncretic and simply want neutral Wikipedia articles. :::::::::For Canada and all other Commonwealth Realms (except for England itself), the monarch appoints a governor-general to take over his or her duties in the realms. Canada and any other country needs a monarchical head of state, because it's a neutral person (and not coming from any party) representing all the People and avoids the country to become a dictatorship. He or she stands for stability, democracy and justice. One only point I don't like on monarchies is that in most of present monarchies the husband of a reigning queen becomes Prince Consort instead of King Consort. That should be changed. And now to the USA: the president is not elected by the People, but by electors. Second, there are only two parties, which have real chances to become ruling parties due to the restrictions of the Constitution. And third, it has a first-past-the-post voting system like in England, which also favors the only two ruling parties. In England, it doesn't matter, because Con. Party and Lab. Party have different aims, while the Rep. and the Dem. Party have very similar aims. Only a few persons in them make exceptions such as Ron Paul, Randall Terry, Rick Santorum or Sarah Palin. :::::::::P.S. And there's a law of which only a few know, which gives the US President the power to pass any proposed law, despite accepted or not by the Congress.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
664,596,876	` — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :WP:Reliable sources reported that. If you have a reliable source to refute ``what the media portrayed``—not personal knowledge, but a reliable source that can be put into the article as a source—please share it. :In the meanwhile, her name will not appear in the infobox here, for the reasons we have stated previously. In about 30 minutes, I will revert your edit again. I am warning you explicitly that if you try to revert me again you will be in violation of the 3RR rule and will be blocked. Please never say you weren't warned. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
664,599,556	::Okay, it's working again. I tried to reply with thanks, but that bounced back by MAILER-DAEMON...	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
664,599,730	:You will need to explain how the use of the image in the article falls within Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Non-free content guidelines. In particlar, review the section on images including acceptable uses, and unacceptable uses. I believe the image falls squarely unto the unnacceptable usage criterion 1. You can either get teh copyright holder of the image to donate it to Wikipedia, or find a free image to replace it. Regards.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
664,608,772	` ==Request== I don't want to go to WP:AN on this since WP:AN often is more trouble than it's worth, especially since it's minor, but User:Winklevi who was brought up at the edit warring 3RR board has been harassing me after I told him three times now not to post on my talk page, at a recent AFD he nominated, he's harassed any user who voted ``keep``, and he really needs to learn how to accurately apply policies and guidelines since he has exhibited very little understanding of what they actually are (and hope some exist that in reality don't). Could you please warn him to (a) stay away from my talk page, (b) stop making threats lightly about blocking and violating policy and (c) actually learn the policies he's trying to demand others follow but has completely misunderstood. His behavior in these three areas are disruptive, in my opinion. Thank you for any help you can offer. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,609,353	, and frankly I find all interaction with him to be frustrating and futile so I would prefer not having to interact	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,610,044	REDIRECT Talk:Blood and Oil	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
664,614,871	* If you want to file a report go ahead, just be prepared for WP:BOOMERANG since (a) you're a difficult editor to deal with (b) you don't have clean hands and (c) you're not liked by several of the editors on the pages I've run into you on who also have had difficulty with you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
664,616,314	` :::Well Wikipedia is not censored, as far as the information is verifiable and justified to be for informational purposes or more specifically enough to have an independent article. I think this article does deliver value. If you think there should be an article on one of those, go ahead and create one. In anycase, I don't think this talk page is the right venue for asking what other articles wikipedia does not have. `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false

664,105,460

== Get A Life! == l00zer

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

664,108,986

No problem, however only the UEFA EUROPA LEAGUE trophy and the INTERCONTINETAL trophy works. The CHAMPIONS LEAGUE and the INTERTOTO trophies do not take me to the same page the other two do, which does not let me use the picture file to add. If you want these added you must find the wiki page in English that takes me to a similar formatted page like the europa league trophy so I can use the picture file. Thanks.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,109,331

: They were deleted by

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,114,405

::: Fair enough, at least you are asking for more input.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,120,161

` == This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2015) == {| style=``width:100%; padding:2px;`` ! Hello, Northamerica1000. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Previous selections: • • Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: using on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |} `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

664,120,606

`::::: Sorry, but you're incorrect in your understanding of primary vs. secondary sources. Nonetheless, though Dunlap & McCright have written primary source material, their chapter in the Oxford Handbook is a secondary source - it ``talks about...primary source[s]`` (some of which happen to be their own, some not). It doesn't present primary research findings, it discusses previous findings. Anyway, that's one of the three sources I discussed. Does that mean that you agree on Farmer & Cook and Robert Manne? Or not? Let's sort through these sources properly. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

664,127,767

` :This article is about the first book, and the first book only calls her ``Janet Way``. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

664,132,486

== Roles and awards == Thanks for . I'd just managed to block out that debacle. I'm disappointed to see the articles for the roles and awards of John Gielgud, Ian McKellen, Kangana Ranaut and Ralph Richardson retain that apocryphal comma in the titles—and worse, that it's spread to Patrick Stewart, Vijay and Arshad Warsi—but there's no reasoning with some people. —''''''

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

664,140,531

` :::::This one has been done to death as well. And this time, I can find the discussion. It is here. This was an administrators' noticeboard complaint raised because a single editor was being regarded by many as being disruptive because he routinely deleted anything from any article that he routinely patrolled that was uncited. This applied to both contentious meterial as well as the blatantly obvious. And he is still very active in this pursuit. The outcome was that he was perfectly within his rights to do so. Any claim in any article that is simply deleted as unreferenced or tagged as {{citation needed}} has, by definition, been challenged and so the ``... unlikely to be challenged ...`` caveat no longer applies. If the meterial was deleted, then anyone restoring it is obliged to provide the reference or they can be held to be edit warring. :::::Until the appearance of this editor, I had long held the view that it was common courtesy to tag a contentious point before deleting it (if no acceptable reference was forthcoming within a reasonable time). I personally still hold that view, but the outcome was that any editor is free to delete any material from any article that is not supported by a reference without giving any notice whatsoever. :::::Please also note: that the fact that other articles do not conform to WP:LEDE is not a valid reason as to why this one should not conform either (WP:OSE). If I had the time, I would thank KDS4444 for his helpful list of other articles; move the list of brand names to the main body (WP:LEDE) assuming they were properly referenced and remove the bolding (MOS:BOLD). `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

664,142,429

` Oh, and by the way, there is a clear line between ``vandalism`` and adding common knowledge. They may be unsourced - but they are not promotion, soapboxing, or vandalism. Get a dictionary.`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,144,293

== Reported for blocking == I just reported you for personal attacks and threats. Go take that high and mighty attitude somewhere else.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,144,839

Sorry, but server history states that you proceeded to harrass me first - with threats of blocking under false pretenses. Sorry, but legally, you lose with such evidences. Even if you are an established editor, a big ego won't get you anywhere.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,145,061

I have retained all the evidences to show it in your face.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,146,783

Sorry but I won't back down from your harrassments. This user reverts all my edits and reports me for vandalism. Get a dictionary and get your definition of harrasment straight.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,147,164

That's a rather feeble premise to argue showing an excessive number of photos prominently showing 24 different women's vaginas, compared to one human male penis 3/4 of the way down the page on the equivalent article for male genitalia. This demonstrates the overwhelming male bias in editorial content on Wikipedia.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

664,147,746

Sorry but I've tried asking why I was warned. All I got was a rude response, numeroues reversed edits even legit ones, another blocking warning. I provide genres for song without or erroneous ones. Some are sourced and some are not. But IndianBIO is reverting all my sourced edits and accuses me of cases such as vandalizing, soapboxing, and advertising. Technically, it's libel, and I can report you all for it.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,147,913

And this page is all I need as evidence.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

664,148,371

Please visit Style (Taylor Swift song).

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,150,561

` Sorry, I counterchecked the source for the genre ``synthpop`` but it is nowhere stated in the given source. ``Electropop`` on the otherhand was clearly stated to be associated with the subject. Is that vandalism? As for Bad Blood, another user removed my sources, and then I was accused of vandalism when I edited it again. Sorry, if you have no common sense, it's a hip-hop song cited in numerous hip-hop websites. My source was removed - is that vandalism for you, or is an attck on a non established editor providing well-intended information. You know what vandalism is? I change the song's name to a different one, or a derogatory or a mocking term. All I did was add genres. I may accept the term unsourced edits, but vandalism is a serious term you may not understand.`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,170,159

` == Blocked == This username has been blocked for being promotional, as evidenced by the content that it tried to add to this project. You are welcome to register for a new account if you would like to contribute to this project in a positive manner. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

664,182,537

` :Okay, first of all, both of you, I don't see any ``inappropriate`` edits in my recent contributions other than me thanking you both and various others for helping me. Maybe I did acknowledge that was in a fight recently, but I only thanked him for defending me and was not in any way trying to restart a war of any kind: I'm too humanitarian for that. One user I talked to warned me already that this isn't Facebook, and I respect that. I can also respect you Medeis not taking me as a sincere person if I you can't be my friend, not everybody can be my friend. But see this: you can't lie to me. I never contacted Materialscientist in any way and neither have I used any ``scare tactics`` against him. I don't even know who he is or what's he's done, I've seen him mentioned only in the Speed of Light article I improved. If anything you Medeis are trying to terrorize me for things you disagree with, threatening me with shutdown. You make me uncomfortable. You aren't being productive. Wikipedia isn't about these kinds of arguments were having, it's about learning. :Second, I was working gathering my sources with an article in Denmark while in the meantime improving these articles. However, you Medeis with your one-sided rivalry blame me of terrorizing the Wikipedia community, blatantly lying about my actions and destroying my reputation. I don't know what part you have in this, , but you, of course, inform me more than this other administrator. I'm not trying to insult anyone, remember that. But back to you, Medeis, your outrageous lies about me are by themselves an insult, and because I'm getting uncooperative administrators treating their editors this way I see no reason for continuing my improvements on Wikipedia. :Jimmy Wales would never approve of any of the violence occurring in Wikipedia. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

664,187,971

::: I have completely changed my mind and will DEFINITELY NOT do any vandalism at all, therefore there is not the slightest need to do any semi protection. I give you my word.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

664,188,061

:I'M REALLY FUCKING SCARED

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

664,188,858

(UTC) :::: Critics of anything are by definition reviewing the primary thing. Thus any critic is a secondary source. 22:49, 26 May 2015

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

664,206,009

:::::Politely asking you a question is not a personal attack here at wikipedia. Cheers!

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,206,251

:::::::btw, I notice that you did not answer said question. Cheers!

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,206,892

::::::::There certainly is no consensus to reinstate the iformation that is a blatant WP:BLP issue. Cheers!

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,211,094

:::::Exactly and . Thank you to you both for your input in this discussion. Cheers!

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,214,261

:::::::::Exactly . Again, I thank you for your input and explanation of wikipedia policies and guidelines. Cheers!

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,222,353

:::::: If signing had anything to do at all with timestamps, there would be no separate three tilde syntax for untimestamped signing. Clearly, signing without timestamping is a perfectly fine thing if developers have thought about it. Also, how kind of you to consider SineBot one of 'you' at whom I supposedly swear. For SineBot was literally the only 'person' in this talk page that I used an expressive word towards. ~~~~

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

664,227,162

Oh, and also regarding signatures. I find it quite funny what while comments of both signing bots use a smaller font, the signatures of both proponents of signing in this section are coloured and bolded. I have yet to see an editor with a small, unassuming, non-disruptive signature that doesn't draw attention to itself, like, oh, let me come up with an example, Username ✉ ✎ (the choice of symbols might not yet be perfect). ~~~~

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

664,256,482

`:::``Unprotection: There is no BLP violation, as it is covered in reliable sources. This semi-protection appears to be an attempt to quash the talkapge consensus to include it, by preventing the IP user from editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 4:40 am, Today (UTC−5)`` See here: This posting is both uncivil and a personal attack on a specific editor suggesting that someone was attempting to ``squash`` talkpage consensus. The posting is also in violation of WP:AGF. An editor who has only been on wikipedia for five months is hardly a regular. If you continue all of your disruptive posts and behaviours I will be presenting this disruption that you have caused at WP:ANI. So please do read up on WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, and WP:DISRUPTION. Cheers! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

664,259,122

== Omissions == This article does not live up to its name. For example where do I find Studebaker cars built prior to 1918? Where are all those carriages and wagons?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,267,062

:::Thanks I was having some browser issues. Sorry for any inconvenience. Cheers!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,269,057

GET OFF OF WIKIPEDIA, YOU WALNUT-PANELED IDIOT!!! YOU WOULDN'T KNOW A GOOD SCHEDULE IF IT PUT CLAMPS ON YOUR TESTICLES!!!

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

664,274,371

:I have often wondered why planet infoboxes like Earth show radius instead of diameter. For Joe Q. Public I have always thought diameter would be assumed by a casual reader.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,287,689

Hayes mods, 1952== Avery, (previously cited), pages 138 & 139 discusses the Hayes mods and the exhaust collectors specifically in listing at lower case I ,semi collector ring. ==

2,015

false

article

random

test

false

664,297,540

` == Self-Healing Materials == Dear Winner 42, I am contacting you in response to the Articles for Creation: Self-Healing Materials rejection as of may 13th. The background of the effort to write this Wikipedia contribution: We are a group of 15 PhD fellows all working together in the EU Marie-Curie Research Training network on ``Self-Healing Materials - from Concepts to Market``, covering various material classes that are designed for an increased sustainability by providing a strategy for self-repair. This is an active area of materials research and currently the first examples of materials with improved self-repair find their way into application. During one of our last meetings we found that the existing Wikipedia Article on ``Self-Healing Materials`` covers only a very small area of the existing material classes: it is indeed concentrated on polymers only. However, there a far more classes of materials that are currently developed for self-healing capability. As such, we combined our efforts to write an article that covers more classes of materials, including ceramics, metals, asphalt, concrete, composites, ... Our suggestion is the following: The existing page is actually a quite nice sum up for Self-Healing Polymers and should be renamed accordingly. Simultaneously, the new article can be uploaded as ``Self-Healing Materials`` and will contain also a link on the page more specializing on the polymer aspect. What do you think? `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

664,306,309

== Please refrain from == people for the fact that other editors have derailed their relevant comment regarding the article into irrelevant subjects such as signing posts. Oh, and also, Wikipedia's supposed 'gender gap' will never ever be closed no matter how much money is thrown at it, and 'inherent cultural bias' is a contradiction. ~~~~

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

664,307,608

== Wow == You're one of those guys whose idea of contribution is retribution by deleting others' comments, aren't you. Figures. The 'gender gap' will never be closed unless Wikipedia becomes a place for women to gossip and socialize with each other on. The only 'cultural bias' Wikipedia has is that it is 'biased' towards objectively important subjects such as science, which coincidentally happen to be those pursued until recently by the Western society, which incidentally has always been the only culture around at all. The 'undue coverage of women' comes from the fact that there are less notable women. Insisting on 'equal coverage' of women and men will result in unequal proportion of notable and non-notable people. The policies supposed to make the place more accessible to women, such as ill-conceived politeness, will only result in making it less accessible to people who only care about getting the fucking job done. ~~~~

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

664,307,988

(UTC) ==Inserting citations== Hi Ariel, here is the code now: http://angielittlefield.com/ebooks/TomThomsonTorontoNeighbourhoods.pdf Indeed, Thomson painted a number of watercolours between 1904 and 1909.http://www.tomthomsoncatalogue.org/catalogue/index.php?pageNum=0 okay step one is erase the two cn tags step two - in front of the http insert thus step three - athe end of the url ref put this I will go correct the first one. Then please you try correcting the second one, and I am sure you will go perfect! The article is shaping up quite well! Congrats. Please ask any questions here, and I will answer them for you. You may also email me from the link at the top of my talk page, or you can also post a note on my talk page. I am glad to help! I really enjoy collaborating with other editors! Just ask! Cheers! 18:39, 27 May 2015

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,308,455

== Wow == You know, when this gets me blocked/banned/whatever, we will both get something out of it. You will have another 'proof' at your disposal how feminists (or possibly women, but I think you are a male) are 'relentlessly harassed' on Wikipedia, which you will be able to then use for your political and ideological agenda, and I'll be amused by the fact that in every piece of my 'harassment', I actually made a good point about something.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

664,309,453

== Suggested change of wording to Template:Uw-harass4 == In line with the most recent findings of the feminist school of criminology, I suggest that a more accurate phrasing should be, instead of 'harass', 'the next time you purposefully and blatantly RAAAAAAPE!!! a fellow Wikipedian'. ~~~~

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

664,324,583

::...and In Kafr has 494 inhabitants...pretty much half-way between Kafr Ein`s 1922 number (=376) and 1945 number (=550).....I think we have a winner! Thanks..

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

664,326,218

` == North Sea Empire and Angevins == This piece of text was removed and then restored to the artricle: ``In the early 11th century, England became part of the ``North Sea Empire`` of Cnut the Great. With the Norman conquest, the kingdom became one of the territories ruled by the House of Anjou``. The North Sea Empire was a personal union between 3 countries that lasted about fifteen or so years (reign of Canute the Great). If it is to be mentioned it shouldn't look like it lasted until the Norman conquest. The second part of the text is plain wrong. The Normans weren't Angevins. And for parts of their reign over England they didn't rule over Normandy, let alone other territories. I'll rewrite a little and remove a little. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

664,340,428

` Since nobody has thought it necessary to post a count before concluding the deletion request, I'll do it. :Keep: 5 :Merge all: 2 :Merge, but keep some:7 :Delete: 0 This means that the original deletion request was rejected. I want to thank everybody for this unanimous vote, because it attests that my contributions were valid. Actually this appeared quite clear from the start as even the originator of the request, , has never cast a vote for deletion. His vote is Merge, but keep some. Thus remains the question why the deletion request was filed at all. I think that had every right to question the utility of the pages created. He was also right trying to influence the further development of the project. There is an instrument on Wikipedia to do that. It is called Talk page. However he decided on another instrument without ever contacting me and this gave a number of people, who had never taken any interest in the argument, the power to interfere. What followed has been called a ``mess`` by and I would rather agree with his definition. More precisely, I'd tend to call the procedure an abuse, since it has been wielded to install a kind of preventive democratic control over how users have to submit their contributions to Wikipedia, which is certainly not the purpose of a deletion request. According to the spirit of the compromise reached and to judge from the messages posted on the single talk pages, it is now in the competence of the admins to decide which articles on ancient athletes are permitted, how many and why. Thus everything has been burocraticized and as a consequence the whole area of research has been transformed into a minefield. So who would ever touch it again? This approach hasn't worked in the past and it never will. Probably these power plays are also among the motives for the loss of so many valid editors whose enthusiasm must have vanished for a reason. As long as these stupid games have the better, I'm afraid the future looks bleak. Wikipedia can only survive as a free encyclopedia and today we have lost some of that freedom. After many words, here is the body count of today's battle: This user has stopped contributing to Wikipedia. What I leave on the field is a rudimentary list of Olympic winners, thirty-five marginal articles with a merge tag and an incomplete calendar which is currently displayed on 776 pages and should have been expanded to 400 more. Maybe the users wielding paragraphs and guidelines will take care of the completion of these projects, but from what I've seen I'm not very optimistic. Thanks everybody for watching. Good bye.`

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

664,345,633

` == Hi Bbb23 I need your help and some advice about possible sockpuppetry == Hi Bbb23, I need your help and some advice about possible sockpuppetry. I am also going to ping @PBS so that he may have advice as well, or if you are really busy just now. There has been ongoing disputes, edit warring, blatant blp issues, NPA's up to like 3 now from one certain editor.in and around the article for a pianist here at en wikipedia, as well as the blp board, edit warring boards (reports by two different editors about the same James Rhodes (pianist) article, page protection board, where @CambridgeBayWeather saw all the blp issuesthat were going on at the time she judged the need for protection there at the pianist article. in her admin role semi-protected the article for one week, then there were three WP:NPA violations against him, which I warned the editor on his talk page on two occasions. Since then the editor has struck up a whole band of possible sock monkeys to help defend him, and also some of the ones have made personal attacks againt me as well in the ani the editor filed. I have been trying to state what has actually happened over this while, but there is so much disruption, attacking, and lacking good faith by him and some others there. I just got to thinking this is so weird. All the possible soccy editors seemed to be acting in concert in how the flow of things went there so far. I just kept my thoughts about all this to myself until now, but it occurred to me to check the block log of this editor to see if he had ever had any trouble with issues that he may have been blocked for. I asked him about the two blocks listed in the report. One block was for 72 hours and the next block was an INdeffinent. block. I noticed the offenses listed was sock puppeting and abusing multiple accounts. When I asked him about the sockpuppetry charge in the ani, he said something to the effect that ``he was testing wikipedias security`` by ``setting up some vandalism only accounts`` to test security. You could read his exact storyline that he posted on there. Are editors allowed to ``test security`` by making up sockpuppets to vandalize editors, articles and such? Is he really working for you as a clerk or something? To paraphrase, he said at ani it was just a couple of accounts, maybe 2 just to test with. I took his word on that for awhile, but then I took a break from making new articles, to just try typing his editor name and sockpuppet in wp search. This is what I found, it had your name on it so I thought you would be the perfect person to explain to me how this works exactly. [title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gabucho181/Archive&oldid;=663847791] Maybe I am not reading the pages and archives correctly since I do not follow the spi reports very often. I see people speak of a duck rule, and or diffs of evidence is needed to request an investigation. I do not know myself is all this meets the duck rule or if there is any real evidence that this user may be continuing to abuse multi accounts or not, But I was stunned to se reports on his archive go back to januaey and the latest one was around may 18. Could you read this over if you have time to see if it warrants asking for all this to be checked on. I do not know how to do a spi report. I am not sure if it can be added on to the ongoing list that goes back several months? Please look it over and let me know something. I am going to work offline on my new article sets tonight, and upload them tomorrow or the next day. I have been doing a series of articles about different writers around the world, and then I make a few stubs from red links in the one about the writer. This is all very discouraging. Thank you. Cheers! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,349,091

` *Merge. I understand that the subject of this article has had more written about him than the others previously nominated but I wouldn't call it significant enough coverage to warrant a standalone article. Keep in mind that I have no prejudice against simply copy-pasting the information on this page to a list article. — `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

664,357,317

WV, go away for 24 hours like you offered, spare us your nonsensical obstruction, and you'll come back and find the grownups will have a respectable conversation without you. Your obstructionist behavior is noisome.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,358,249

:::* Your complaint here WV assumes that the sections will moved without appropriate revisions to the content. The article needs revising, and a comprehensive article will reflect that. The reorganization is just a first step.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,360,304

:::Thanks so much for your help and advice! Cheers!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,361,531

` :::@Roboskiye: we deal in facts here, not personal accusations and attacks. Please state why your edit is justified and why the other editors' edits were unjustified, citing appropriate sources. • `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

664,364,033

`It seems you have some issues with confronting your own psychological conditioning, and you're right I hardly know you at all. Thank you, genuinely, for your help on the Origins of the Six-day war dubiousness re-phrasing, in addition, or perhaps more specifically; coincidentally, in the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Origins_of_the_Six-Day_War#Nasser_steps_made_the_war_inevitable there is a nice chart during the wonderful work that is shown to keep the statement as it was (the blame), however the work he cites ``-See Maoz p. 98 ``The existing literature...most of the blame for the outbreak of the war is placed on Nasser and the Egyptian decision making process`` shows it as 'most' and then later on in the chart he uses the word 'most' again. this would also be an appropriate word come to think of it it may be better, although it is not my specialty and 'some' is already more precise than 'the' as it cannot be confused with the other uses of 'the' that imply unique-ness or a soleness of existence. Also this may belong in a different part of Wikipedia, although considering as it is regarding the dubiousness that comes about as a result of the form these ideas are expressed in, it doesn't seem to fit into the 'nassar talks made war inevitable' section of the talk page on Origins of Six-Day. `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

664,384,503

: Whilst your response makes me chuckle, I'm sure you understand the fallaciousness of your argument as one is considerably more acheivable than the other (and I suspect I am more dedicated as well)

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

664,386,649

(Search Engine) Sanook is a very popular Thai search engine, and also there is a Sanook page in Thai (Thai script).

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

664,405,008

I detest opaqueness masquerading as civility. Frankness will get you the furthest with me.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

664,418,857

== PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE == JUST GET RID OF MY ACCOUNT ALREADY

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

664,422,105

` : I think this is all rather scholastic. The name is admittedly imperfect due to the fact that the article essentially catalogues very recent (by the standards of any encyclopedia) and ongoing events. But the term could be justified: the number 2 therein implies a clear reference to THE Cold War, which evokes unmistakable associations, the prime one being the rivalry exactly between Russia (the USSR) and the US for the global dominance (to put it bluntly). And not just some highly localised and geopolitically irrelevant (unless you watch CNN claptrap on a daily basis) squabble somewhere in the Near East. Russia is the only state that not merely defies the US, but challenges the entire status quo as established post-Cold War, as is clear from Putin's quotes cited in the Background section. There is every sign that he is determined to achieve at least what the USSR had, i.e. dominance over half of the Continental Europe, or to go nuclear in a very literal sense of the term, i.e. obliterating the centres of Western civilisation. This is almost official now. Thus, at the end of the day, Yes, it is about the US vs the RF, as the US is the only military force in NATO to speak of. But the implications thereof are very broad, the phenomenon is nascent, therefore separate article is warranted, I think. We do not know as of now how it is to evolve: it may very well be the case, the appropriate title in a few months will be ``THE RUN-UP TO WORLD WAR III``. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,431,911

` :::There are not any. WP:NONENG has to do with the verifiability of foreign language sources such that they are usable and allows the usage of translation which again you seem to fail to note indicated ``Movies``. Where do you have your English language sources to determine that it is Disney Cinema? None, as you use a Google link that only pulls up French language articles. Official names are not automatically used at WP per Wikipedia:Official names. Using Movies instead of Cinema is consistent with the other alternative Disney Cinemagic alternative channels as point out before. So to a certain extent the sources for those channels' name are indirectly are the English language sources for the selected translation. Again ``Cinema`` is acknowledged as a possibility in the actual table entry for that channel. But you seen to fail to care and/or look and continue to beat a dead horse. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

664,432,407

` :::* unless you can point to a policy that says ``Major contributions`` is inherently POV then your crusade is ignorable. The man changed economics, mathematics, computers, evolutionary biology, business, war, politics, and diplomacy with a few brief papers...several reliable sources which can and will be used to interpret his works establish that. That, with the spectre of understatement, is a major contribution to those fields and the twentieth century. Until you establish it's inherent bias and a relevant policy interpretation held by the wider consensus of Wikipedia users, you're opinion is just an opinion, and an ill-informed one. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,433,499

== why are you such an idiot? == ?

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

664,438,975

== I didn't vandalize that article! == I was undoing vandalism by that IP!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,440,848

` Sure ) I didn't add ``derpyday``, I think the IP did it, reverted it, but I accidentally reverted it back in. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,440,976

` I didn't add ``derpyday``, I think the IP did it, reverted it, but I accidentally reverted it back in. Thanks for cleaning it up! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

664,441,818

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Barnstar of Diplomacy |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Thanks for resolving the ``derpyday`` issue! |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,449,296

The star HIP 85605 has *very poorly* determined data and is more marketing hype than science.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

664,459,340

` ::Again: Why can't you just wait? `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

664,473,486

`:: You appear not to understand Courtier's Reply. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

664,480,773

Include where? I added them to my watchlist now.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

664,481,863

* All the television reports mentioned that they did not wear seatbelts. If it's not in the print news coverage, I'd be rather surprised. Did you check nj.com?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,482,088

These have mentions of it: .

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,482,784

` *Comment I moved this page to ``Surface (first generation)`` per WP:ORDINAL before noticing this discussion. The Surface Pro article should be moved to Surface Pro (first generation) to avoid ambiguity. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

664,496,424

mmmm i love them. Also i go to mcdonalds a lot. I like their hamburgers. Especially their big fattie lard ones. They make me even more hungry. Then I got to Burger King. One day I was talking to the king. Suddenly I looked over at him and I saw him as a big juicy hamburger. I got hungry. I then proceeded to eat him.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,497,060

::::You're right - contradictory spaces/nospaces spellings of the foundation have been left in during all the back-and-forths. Sigh. As for why it's styled that way, why is iPod styled that way? Why is FairPoint Communications styled that way? They just are. -

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

664,497,416

Aloha Calidam, are you Hawaiian ? IT IS CLEAR BY YOUR REMOVAL THAT YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH MY ADDITIONS which are facts and proven truth, AND YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE PART OF THE ONGOING TREASON TO ENSLAVE THE PEOPLE. To find out and determine what action needs to be taken, I will send private E-mail for investigation. Please let us reason together so we can best serve the enslaved. Welton

2,015

false

user

random

train

false

664,525,074

* The article on Dilemma of determinism is not mine, it seems to have been written by somebody knowledgeable in philosophy or at least somebody who read a lot of books on the topic. I prefer another version thereof: . Please note that both the Hume's passes and the James' lecture were precisely on this topic (analysing of human freedom in terms of necessity and chance and discussing the argument of whether there can be any freedom when using such dichotomy; such chance/necessity analysis was also done by Schopenhauer and the argument was used by many modern philosophers, see the archival article from my link).

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

664,525,469

` * The present state of the description of Pereboom's views is a joke. The old article on the Dilemma of determinism explained it better: (quote from Pereboom) ``As has often been pointed out, such random physical events are no more within our control than are causally determined physical events, and thus, we can no more be morally responsible for them than, in the indeterminist opinion, we can be for events that are causally determined.`` The whole dichotomistic argument (i.e. the one basing on the analysis of the extent of determinism and lack of determinism, here aptly called randomness) is missing in this version of Free will. That's why an edit like mine should be included. If you dislike mine, please suggest which words should be changed and what is the wording that you can accept. I guess an admin sold this topic for cash so I am now more careful editing. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,525,920

or even owner – who knows who exactly –

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,526,507

***No, sorry, I live in Poland and don't read books in English, especially little known ones. How could I have got to know them? If I saw them in a book store, I would buy translated ones. Piotr Nizynski

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

664,526,568

(you can find my blog easily)

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

664,531,105

== Unnotable ozzies == Stop creating articles on Australians nobody's ever heard of! You are driving randykitty crazy! She's dropping fur all over the place!!

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

664,554,847

mind yo damn buisness

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,554,974

yo man you wanna fight im ready anytime.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

664,555,073

henry lee lucas was my dad im pretty sure i know the information better than you do.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,555,230

yo i got me a gun ill shoot u

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

664,555,298

quit bein a bitch and talk to me

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

664,556,013

yo bitch you think you can get rid of me im black

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

664,574,740

== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,574,921

== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins (so that there is no single common name for the famous argument now, in the whole literate Earth) but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

664,575,480

== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins (so that there is no single common name for the famous argument now, in the whole literate Earth) but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

664,575,635

== Dilemma of determinism == You contributed to the topic dilemma of determinism, aka standard argument against free will. The topic was deleted by officious admins (so that there is no longer a single common name for the famous argument now, in the whole literate Earth) but I raised a request for deletion review and now users can vote that the decision be overturned. If you prefer that such article keeps existing on Wikipedia, you are welcome to vote with the bold word overturn on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Active.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

664,588,904

:::::::::I know, and as I told, I am politically syncretic and simply want neutral Wikipedia articles. :::::::::For Canada and all other Commonwealth Realms (except for England itself), the monarch appoints a governor-general to take over his or her duties in the realms. Canada and any other country needs a monarchical head of state, because it's a neutral person (and not coming from any party) representing all the People and avoids the country to become a dictatorship. He or she stands for stability, democracy and justice. One only point I don't like on monarchies is that in most of present monarchies the husband of a reigning queen becomes Prince Consort instead of King Consort. That should be changed. And now to the USA: the president is not elected by the People, but by electors. Second, there are only two parties, which have real chances to become ruling parties due to the restrictions of the Constitution. And third, it has a first-past-the-post voting system like in England, which also favors the only two ruling parties. In England, it doesn't matter, because Con. Party and Lab. Party have different aims, while the Rep. and the Dem. Party have very similar aims. Only a few persons in them make exceptions such as Ron Paul, Randall Terry, Rick Santorum or Sarah Palin. :::::::::P.S. And there's a law of which only a few know, which gives the US President the power to pass any proposed law, despite accepted or not by the Congress.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

664,596,876

` — Preceding unsigned comment added by • :WP:Reliable sources reported that. If you have a reliable source to refute ``what the media portrayed``—not personal knowledge, but a reliable source that can be put into the article as a source—please share it. :In the meanwhile, her name will not appear in the infobox here, for the reasons we have stated previously. In about 30 minutes, I will revert your edit again. I am warning you explicitly that if you try to revert me again you will be in violation of the 3RR rule and will be blocked. Please never say you weren't warned. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

664,599,556

::Okay, it's working again. I tried to reply with thanks, but that bounced back by MAILER-DAEMON...

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

664,599,730

:You will need to explain how the use of the image in the article falls within Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Non-free content guidelines. In particlar, review the section on images including acceptable uses, and unacceptable uses. I believe the image falls squarely unto the unnacceptable usage criterion 1. You can either get teh copyright holder of the image to donate it to Wikipedia, or find a free image to replace it. Regards.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

664,608,772

` ==Request== I don't want to go to WP:AN on this since WP:AN often is more trouble than it's worth, especially since it's minor, but User:Winklevi who was brought up at the edit warring 3RR board has been harassing me after I told him three times now not to post on my talk page, at a recent AFD he nominated, he's harassed any user who voted ``keep``, and he really needs to learn how to accurately apply policies and guidelines since he has exhibited very little understanding of what they actually are (and hope some exist that in reality don't). Could you please warn him to (a) stay away from my talk page, (b) stop making threats lightly about blocking and violating policy and (c) actually learn the policies he's trying to demand others follow but has completely misunderstood. His behavior in these three areas are disruptive, in my opinion. Thank you for any help you can offer. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,609,353

, and frankly I find all interaction with him to be frustrating and futile so I would prefer not having to interact

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,610,044

REDIRECT Talk:Blood and Oil

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

664,614,871

* If you want to file a report go ahead, just be prepared for WP:BOOMERANG since (a) you're a difficult editor to deal with (b) you don't have clean hands and (c) you're not liked by several of the editors on the pages I've run into you on who also have had difficulty with you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

664,616,314

` :::Well Wikipedia is not censored, as far as the information is verifiable and justified to be for informational purposes or more specifically enough to have an independent article. I think this article does deliver value. If you think there should be an article on one of those, go ahead and create one. In anycase, I don't think this talk page is the right venue for asking what other articles wikipedia does not have. `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false