Datasets:
dirtycomputer
/
Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
662,343,594
Not welcome here? I'M WELCOME EVERYWHERE! -???
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,343,936
I am not vandalizing anything. I am being serious this time, I apologize for everything I did. If i offended you in anyway, I am sorry. I do not want to get blocked. I have only been on here for like two or three days and people are already starting to hate me and one person says I'm harrassing him. I'm not harrassing anyone. Please don't block me. By the way, I promise I will not make ANY more edits to Wikipedia. -Mariolyrics4evr
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
662,345,583
You must think I'm a pestering loser, right? -ML4E
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,347,860
` ::::From their ``about us``: Ars fused opinion, analysis, and straight-laced reporting into an editorial product long before commercial ``blogs`` arrived on the scene and claimed to reinvent journalism by doing the same. Thats what I mean by ``blending``, above. `
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
662,354,050
Is there a way to determine how many times a page I created was visited/hit? Steven Paul Fisher
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
662,402,774
== Josh Glenn == I changed it to Joshua Glenn (footballer) so the link to his GCFC profile was accessible?
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,404,433
Support merging these articles. Given the time period between the proposal and the current time, and given the lack of opposition, the article should be merged immediately.
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
662,405,010
` * Make a guess, you have three attempts! Hint: he spams his ceiling fan videos and pictures on Wikipedia in various more or less creative ways, then brings attention to his vandalism by thanking for random edits of mine. (Another hint: he starts with ``D`` and ends with ``avid Beals``.) - `
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
662,410,237
:I believe you are confused with the intended statement in the Legacy section, specifically the paragraph. The paragraph is not arguing that VS took place in a separate universe from the Ivalice of FFXII and FFT. It simply states that Matsuno had conflicting ideas with the lore surrounding VS and the Ivalice games. The reader is free to establish whether VS takes place in the Ivalice of FFT or FFXII, and by Square Enix's standards it seems that they are retconning whatever it is Matsuno had intended. :The problem with your edit now is lack of verifiable info and the way the statement is written. The argument that in-game allusions establishes game connection is flimsy. Game articles rely on out-of-universe statements such as developer comments for references. :And it's funny that you cited the Final Fantasy Wiki, since I have worked as editor in there, mainly for Ivalice-related articles. —
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
662,424,557
== Look, dothead... == This is a white man's encyclopedia. Stop messing with my edits.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
true
662,441,385
:This has made the news, so we may see more of these antics today.
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
662,447,345
I swear, you're extremely stupid and oblivious. Open your eyes, unless you need to see an eye doctor that is.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
662,453,025
== Carl Nielsen GA == Thanks, Mirokado, for all you assistance in helping to improve the article for GA (which it has now reached). In a couple of months, I would like to add content resulting from the anniversary performances and their reception. We could then perhaps go for FA. In the meantime, we'll schedule a DYK for 9 June.
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
662,459,758
:Thanks Gerda, but as I am going to get indeffed again I will no longer be editing, happy editing to you guys though.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,465,684
::::: The markup is pretty minimal, so you should be able to edit that page and shuffle or rewrite the content to to fit your class. If you have any trouble, give me a ping.
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
662,466,140
:I am blocked and am unable to comment over there. They can do what they want, or what FPaS wants at any rate, I have had enough.
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
662,466,938
:And no doubt people still think FPaS is not harassing me, Ha
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,480,944
TWO unobjective SHILL in talkback.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
true
662,481,233
but true of myself as I unobjectively shill for certain positions
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,481,669
You should try the above with the Reichsbahn.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,490,058
HI, i am currently unblocked now. I will leave the List of Steven Universe Episodes alone now. I swear.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,490,376
I swear to God, I will leave everything on Wikipedia alone unless it NEEDS to be changed, but that is only if I have proof, not just random guesses. I promise. Seriously. I do. Honestly. Truthfully.
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
662,490,550
I swear to God, I will leave everything on Wikipedia alone, unless it NEEDS to be changed, but that is only if I have proof, not just random guesses. I swear. I promise. Honestly. Truthfully.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,491,002
JUST PLEASE LISTEN TO ME!!! I AM MAKING TRUTHFULLY HONEST TRUTHS! I WILL LEAVE EVERYTHING ON WIKIPEDIA ALONE! I SWEAR AFTER THIS, I WILL LEAVE YOU ALONE FOREVER!
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,491,208
COULD YOU JUST LISTEN TO ME FOR 5 SECONDS?!! I know you hate me, and I know you want to leave me alone, but it makes me sad that just for one minor edit, you just block me. I know that's what you have to do. By the way, this is NOT vandalism. Truth. I will leave you alone forever if you give me one more chance. PLEASE!
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,531,255
REDIRECT Talk:Zor Abu Dardaa
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
662,543,934
You're right. I don't like how Wikipedia works, I don't like any of the experienced editors. I shouldn't be here. I did not insult anyone because I think I'm better. I do not want a Wikipedia page for your previously stated reasons. I use Wikipedia and consider it credible.nif anyone can tell you how big my dick is, it's me. Neither you nor your website give me any clout. I wasn't promoting. What am I going to say, hey go check out my Wikipedia. Fuck you, your editor friends and Wikipedia. And fuck my Wikipedia page I dont want one add that to my wiki I hope they ban me and delete my account so I don't have to do it
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
662,544,086
Neil. I'm sure you read my last message too. Your community wasn't very welcoming so.. Ban me delete me do what you gotta do BOSS
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
662,556,081
== Bob Lynch (comics) == That article is created by Bob Lynch himself, which is a clear violation of Wikipedia policies. Also, no, the proposed deletion has not been declined. Is Bob Lynch your friend? The image that you deleted is that of Bob Lynch himself, so it has a direct relation to the article that should be deleted anyhow.
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
662,569,310
== Tunisia pop. == http://www.academia.edu/4137738/Mitochondrial_DNA_and_Y-chromosome_microstructure_in_Tunisia ref for the page being wrong. You don't own the page you don't have to keep going on from it. What interest do you have in this? Stop revisionist everything I do if I have evidence for something you can't just erase what I do. That's not how this works. You don't own Wikipedia or that page it's not your personal website.
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
662,581,592
It's not about getting in trouble it's about you not getting to do whatever you want like you own the place. Why do I have to do all this just to update a page with sources? Against you?
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,587,669
== Its time to pay back == you are an asshole an asshole and yet again an asshole total idiot you are a real piece of shit
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
662,589,183
FUCK OFF YOU CRYBABY SHIT OF A MAN
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
662,598,552
I will edit as I see fit and remove things I find irrelevant as it is a free for all and freedom of opinion and speech so shut up.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
662,617,455
== You don't own wikipedia == You are ignoring others' edits and enforcing your own views here. As can be seen on your talk page, many people are unhappy with your revisions. I have told you repeatedly that Bob Lynch created that article and that article should be deleted, as it is against wikipedia's policy. You should be blocked from editing any articles here and your account should be deleted. I am reverting back my edits and i am putting Bob Lynch's image on the page. If you try to get me blocked, i will just create another account and deal with you. You are a bully and your ways will not be tolerated on wikipedia
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
662,651,851
REDIRECT Talk:Part XXI of the Constitution of India
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
662,656,441
Giving severely inadequate human beings some form of petty power is always a mistake, as demonstrated par excellence here. Your consolation, Joe, is that you no doubt have an actual life and a girlfriend/wife.
2,015
false
user
blocked
test
false
662,672,670
== Daily Mail story == What should be said, if anything about this story in the Daily Mail? The article currently says this: 'It then emerged that he is a member of the exclusive M Den club behind the Bank of England which sells £150 steaks and cognac up to £4,000, where he keeps a £300 cognac locker and has one of fifty electronic keys to a secret entrance to the restaurant'
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
662,673,106
== Sexuality == Does kissing a male co-star make you inherently gay? No. It seems that the book may feature his coming out, but no source is currently being used. I am removing sexuality for now
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
662,673,621
` I have already listed my concerns on the talk page. I am familiar with multiple such pages on the web, with dangerous software that claim to be ``registry cleaners`` etc. I'll post examples of these, in a little while. Additionally, per the discussion on the talk page, the consensus has been that low quality citations on wikipedia are unacceptable. This editor is violating that and also linking to a page whose purpose is to drive an exe install, which is not the kind of reference that is acceptable on wikipedia.`
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,675,931
` I am copy pasting the dangerous part of the reference link: ``ATTENTION! Important Notice About the Flipora VIRUS: Manual Removal should be performed by computer experts only! Some infections are capable of striking back and destroying your system, if not entirely removed. The recommended Flipora Removal Tool* will save you a lot of time and troubles. Below is a link to a FREE scanner that you can use to identify the virus. >> Click Here to DOWNLOAD Automatic Flipora Fixer*.`` The link it points to is: http://www.virusresearch.org/spyhunter-installation-instructions/ (visiting this link automatically triggers an exe download). , I apologize for the bad faith comment on an earlier edit. It was written in a hurry. But please visit the link above and tell me if this looks safe to you. If not please block this editor from editing or protect this page against disruptive edits. On this talk page as well as delete page, the repeated consensus was that the reference links need to be high quality. There was even a debate on whether references from Forbes, Huffingtonpost, Inc. magazine etc. was noteworthy enough, or whether this article should be deleted, which is still not resolved. It's fair to say that such a reference from a much less reputable source, which drives the person to install an exe, cannot possibly meet wikipedia standards. Also, please apologize for your bad faith comment of accusing me of lying.`
2,015
false
article
blocked
train
false
662,676,457
I understand. i've explained myself clearly on the talk page, and am also giving detailed reasons, while the other user is repeatedly making disruptie edits, without reason and also accusing me of lying.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,676,558
` == ``box inappropriate and false`` – why? == You have deleted the language boxes added to the articles Austrian German, German Standard German and Swiss Standard German. Your edit summary was a mere ``box inappropriate and false``. May I ask you what was inappropriate and false about these boxes? `
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
662,677,531
` Sure, please look at the other two users also who seem related and seem hell bent on distributing this reference link. The link contains the following text at the bottom and pushes you to install an exe. I am copy pasting the dangerous part of the reference link which is http://www.virusresearch.org/flipora-removal-instructions/ ``ATTENTION! Important Notice About the Flipora VIRUS: Manual Removal should be performed by computer experts only! Some infections are capable of striking back and destroying your system, if not entirely removed. The recommended Flipora Removal Tool* will save you a lot of time and troubles. Below is a link to a FREE scanner that you can use to identify the virus. >> Click Here to DOWNLOAD Automatic Flipora Fixer*.`` The link it points to is: http://www.virusresearch.org/spyhunter-installation-instructions/ (visiting this link automatically triggers an exe download). Haminoon: I am merely reversing their edits they are adding without explanation. You were part of the talk and delete page discussion and were pushing for a high bar for noteworthiness of references.`
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,679,402
I would like to add that I did exactly these things per protocol. I repeatedly listed my concerns on the talk page, tried dispute resolution and also repeatedly requested for the page to be protected on the talk page.
2,015
false
user
blocked
test
false
662,695,621
Hi , Thank you! I am fundamentally in agreement with you on both the length of the discussion and that this article should echo the main. The main article treats the information that is in question as opinion, and attributes it to the sources on which it is based. I suggest that if we are to include the same material here, we need to also attribute it to these sources; but that a series of attributed opinions is excessive for this list page, and it is more appropriate to simply provide a list of the key/core points of the controversy, without judgement or conclusion on them. :I have attempted to demonstrate this by reference to policy and, where necessary, sources. I maintain that I am not discussing the nature of the subject itself (which would be WP:FORUM), but how we should represent it in this list. I have attempted to present a number of compromise alternatives, but these have not been as yet accepted. I have thought that we might seek a third opinion (WP:3O), but am not sure that 's earlier involvement invalidates that option. Would you have any advice on noticeboards or other avenues which might resolve this issue? Regards, -
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
662,702,411
::I misunderstood; I thought white was fog of war, not al-Nusra. The original map I updated did not provide any description for al-Nusra. I was working based off what I could, which admittedly was pretty poor for an English-speaker. •
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
662,709,064
== Nutritional Values why per 248 gms ?== Why not per 100 g like all other foods ?
2,015
false
article
random
test
false
662,715,817
` == You don't own wikipedia == You are ignoring others' edits and enforcing your own views here. As can be seen on your talk page, many people are unhappy with your revisions. I have told you repeatedly that Bob Lynch created that article and that article should be deleted, as it is against wikipedia's policy. You should be blocked from editing any articles here and your account should be deleted. I am reverting back my edits and i am putting Bob Lynch's image on the page. If you try to get me blocked, i will just create another account and deal with you. You are a bully and your ways will not be tolerated on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
662,741,775
== Collingwood Players == Yeah no worries mate will do you got all the updates for round 7 up to date?
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,746,231
So go and fuck yourself James b Watson and winner 42 as overall pathetic hiding behind a false name you will be loser 42 when I have finished. This site is full of morons who do not allow edits of correct events etc and I am not the only one to voice my opinion on this. Most of the stuff on here is inaccurate and copied and pasted from the likes of the sun and needs to be dealt with, it is an unreliable source of information and a ghastly search engine on topics due to its unreliability on the truth and fact.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
662,761,694
:::I wouldn't mind so much but I couldn't even comment over there my keyboard id fucked and can't really use a mobile for shite like that, they totally ignore the hounding by fpas and ignore the unblock provisions granted by basc, it is a fucking joke
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
662,763,580
:I can't Cal, my keyboard died see last response to RP
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,770,715
:But we can have Windows Redstone; the codename of the first update of Windows 10. We just shouldn't link it for the time being.
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
662,780,847
==Do not add info without references== Your edit on Spongebob Squarepants was unnecessary. I reverted your edit as soon as possible It is 360 episodes not 186 episodes. I would have reported you so that someone could blocked you however as you are a respected member in Wikipedia, I am giving you a chance. I may not be an admin but I can still warn people if necessary. Be Warned Paleocemoski. Ukvoltaire123
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,789,878
== ) == Look, another good little Marxist.
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
662,790,660
::Sorry, I've been around this site much longer than you, just check my userpage history. I'm not afraid to call a spade a spade though. Trust me, you slimy fucks will all have your day.
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
662,794,088
`I have also checked here the duck test and read guideline for appealing as well its says The duck test – ``If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck`` – suggests that a person can identify an unknown subject by observing that subject's habitual characteristics. The duck test does not apply in non-obvious cases. Unless there is such clear and convincing evidence, editors must assume good faith from others. `
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
662,800,995
Oh dear winner 42 and James b Watson has the cat got your tongue see I am the winner fuck wits so fuck you you pair of bell ends or perhaps you are a pair of bell end suckered or just overall cunts.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
662,807,070
::I agree. I didn't add the article, but others have repeatedly added it. I've removed the story from the page. If anyone else wants to add it, they should explain why here.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
662,811,838
Believe me i'm editing them fine and i was watching game live but anyway whatever happend now it's in the past let's walk ahead with less mistakes have nice time bub. (talk).
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,816,100
Ya, I do admit that they are a little sloppy, that's why I discuss them on article talk pages for information, MarnetteD keeps saying that my edit are disruptive and stuff, MarnetteD just won't get along with me too, he told not to reply to him ever again. I've been trying really really hard of being nice to him and other stuff, I never said any mean threats to him, I guess me and him will never get along, he still won't listen to me. He's putting me down really badly....
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
662,850,080
:Padenton, you have reverted me twice without explaining exactly what WP:NASTRO policy guideline *you* think I changed. I have better explained the current policy, but I did not change accepted practices.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,854,207
:::Take it to Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(astronomical_objects)#Changes_without_consensus. I would say you are the one out of line that can not support reverting my edits.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,854,920
Please calm down, . I've literally only noticed this message. I'm clearly not as familiar as you are with Wikipedia. Yes, the source is right, but maybe I shouldn't be using Wikipedia if I can't understand about the licence. I apologise, but you have to understand I only created that article with good intentions.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
662,866,995
easy to follow through the use of bullet points and paragraphs where necessary.
2,015
true
user
random
dev
false
662,871,225
` , , , for starters. ● `
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
662,876,195
:This question has been posted here for 3 years, and neither Fixanoid, nor
2,015
false
article
blocked
test
false
662,879,208
` :You're absolutely correct, it IS the principle of the thing. I, also, was very hopeful that this software would help with transparency and limit tracking. Instead, it seems that they want to choose WHO tracks you, to the benefit of the advertising partners of Ghostery, or whatever the current name of their parent company. They haven't been acquired, it seems, but change their name and explain with doubletalk. Their usage stats are not transparent, nor is their business model, and when I attempt to to disable/delete their software, they act very much like malware. As the man said, ``If it walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck, ...`` `
2,015
false
article
blocked
train
false
662,882,374
::Nick, please ignore abuser:Drmies. He has a tendency to pick on new users such as yourself when he as an admin should be acting as a grown-up and a role-model. Drmies should not be badgering opposers of an RFA candidate whom he had nommed and he knows that. However, you must be resistant because he and his supporters will try to get you blocked. Drmies please always assume good faith on a new user. Regards.
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
662,882,399
== RFA. == Please don't badger opposers of an RFA candidate whom you had nommed. You do know better than that. I won't check back here to read or respond to abusive posts by your TPS'ers. However, I will say that the way you all treat new users such as Nick would frighten a new user from ever wanting to edit on the project or run for an RFA because of the way you treat the voters. Please always AGF. Regards.
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
662,886,819
:We do not do primary schools. What are we going to do for the vast majority of schools that do not have websites or only use Facebook (which generally we deprecate because many people - me, included - refuse to sign up to it). -
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
662,901,941
` Thank you DGG. But, I've never advertised myself as a ``Wikipedia Manager``. I don't own any website where such an advert is placed. I'll like to see the link if you've got them. Except if you're referring to my external profile links on Elance.com, Freelancer.com, and Odesk.com. On such platforms, I only advertised my services as a ``Wikipedia editor`` alongside other services I render such as web content, blogging, ebook writing, etc. Wikipedia editing is just part of what I do. I only started editing recently. Thanks again. `
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
662,902,327
Besides, I sent you an email because you said Paid wikipedia editing requires specialized writing. I only desired to learn about that. That's why I asked for your help. Thanks
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
662,910,206
` Reaper Eternal thanks for removing the web host block but what about the personal attacks of the editor I was responding to, calling another editors good faith edits ``trash`` several times, and no call to remove that, is that kind of editing ok with you? `
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,912,574
Reaper Eternal, if you have the time take a look at just these two comments by Nishidani as well as his talk page were, who by the way was called upon by Hijiri 88 to help attack CurtisNaito several times, are these condesending and insulting comments acceptable? How is what I said any worse? *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#CurtisNaito_needs_to_be_banned_from_edits_related_to_pre-1868_Japanese_history *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#Little_help *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#Curtis.27s_still_at_it *Whatever, no one need take my word for anything. I know the topics fairly thoroughly, through primary and secondary sources in Japanese and Western languages. I try however to avoid the topic area because of the need to WP:AGF, and all I can see is puerile bickering and dumb-ignorant edits based on an inability to see good sources and evaluate reliable evidence. I see only POV passions, googling for evidence to support them, and above, all, the tolerance on the page of sheer bad edits or nonsense that anyone with the slightest BA competence in Japanese studies would find laughable (I'm thinking of CurtisNaito in this regard). There are massive corrections to be made, but, as Ubikwit says, one simply doesn't have the time (at least for now), except to note that the litigants who do edit those pages, can't see the obvious (citing outdated sources like Fenellosa et al. from a century back,etc. I gave details a year ago why none of them are reliable, and suggested how to fix the sourcing: almost nothing done, and my edits are invariably to replace bad edits by giving several good sources, which, however anyone could do, if they had the foggiest idea of what Japanese scholarship knows). If there is competent area specialists available to review these messes, by all means get a third opinion from her, them. Nishidani (talk) *Well, I also know this topic very thoroughly.' Sigh. I've had to correct virtually every edit I've seen you make, or revert every revert. True, you eventually accept nearly all of these improvements, after persisting on the talk page in justifying the trash you added, but, had you known the material, you wouldn't have dumped in the trash in the first place. I can document this at great length, but suffice it to read the relevant talk pages, and examine each time you've been reverted by a knowledgeable editor.Nishidani (talk)
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,921,845
On a related topic: Do you think it will ever be possible to discover why both Sir William Cunliffe Brooks and Samuel Mendel worshipped at this church ? Both their houses were outside the 1845 Parochial boundary, and would have been much closer to the new St.Margaret's in Whalley Range, Manchester.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,951,254
What about Indian terrorist army killing a 9 year kashmiri boy on 5 may 2015 just because kashmiris in Indian occupied kashmir were waving Pakistani flag and asking india to give them right of self determination in accordance with United nation resolutions ? Oh i forgot to mention killing of 90,000 kashmiris in the process of occupation by terrorist indian army. Be human and see the reality with your open eyes before making a patriotic edit request. we all love our respective countries but we should respect other humans specially kashmiries.
2,015
false
article
blocked
train
false
662,951,391
== Gilgit Baltistan == What about Indian terrorist army killing a 9 year kashmiri boy on 5 may 2015 just because kashmiris in Indian occupied kashmir were waving Pakistani flag and asking india to give them right of self determination in accordance with United nation resolutions ? Oh i forgot to mention killing of 90,000 kashmiris in the process of occupation by terrorist indian army. Be human and see the reality with your open eyes before making a patriotic edit request. we all love our respective countries but we should respect other humans specially kashmiries.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
662,958,733
If an editor has RS evidence that the persecutions are some kind of hoax or that the murder of millions of people by Communist was justified then by all means present it. However, we are not going to say an article is NPOV because an alternative version of events that no one is even sure exists, has not been presented. Also we are not into Fringe theories and psuedo-history here. I am removing the NPOV tag pending a more substantive complaint than maybe there is an alternative version of events. This is an encyclopedia. We don't deal with maybes and we are not going to label an article NPOV because someone doesn't like it.
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
662,963,580
hi im bob and i know notthing about flamethrowers. so DEEZ NUTS will help me tell you about it
2,015
false
article
blocked
train
false
662,997,443
: Do what you want. Can't care less.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
662,999,540
is the sock puppet of ,fuck off
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
663,000,003
Okay. I will take note of that should anything similar arise in the future. Thank you, .
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
663,016,153
` :: Your bold action is ignorant and incorrect. The ``C:`` isn't just a logogram as you falsely assume and insist it is. Despite your arrogance and condescending tone with me, I'm going to place the proof on this talk page for the article as proof that the proper title of this game is indeed C: The Contra Adventure. For your information, just because an official website does not exist anymore for something, it does not give you the permission or right to change something about it and claim that it is valid. That is not how it works. I'll also post scans of the manual itself that supports what I state (and which applies to the other Contra games in the series whose titles lack colon only in the packaging). First off, here are the official, appropriate sources that list this game as C: The Contra Adventure: :http://ca.ign.com/articles/1998/09/17/c-the-contra-adventure :http://www.amazon.com/C-Contra-Adventure-Playstation/dp/B00002STIG :http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps/196860-c-the-contra-adventure :http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0782031/ :http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/c-the-contra-adventure-review/1900-2546981/ :http://contra.wikia.com/wiki/C_-_The_Contra_Adventure :http://strategywiki.org/wiki/C:_The_Contra_Adventure :http://www.giantbomb.com/c-the-contra-adventure/3030-7454/ :http://klustr.net/contra/games/ :https://contrapedia.wordpress.com/c-the-contra-adventure/ :http://contra.kontek.net/games/games.htm I would provide Appaloosa's old official website, but it is no longer functional. Same with the early Neo Contra official page. Many of those links above indicate that the game has only received a North American release. And guess what? The wikipedia article itself even only lists a North American release date; because that is the only region where it has received an official release. Soon, I'm going to scan each page of the game's manual where its proper title is written (ie, every page that has it). Then, it can be agreed upon by any rational person what the real title of the game is; and Verdy P can finally either admit that he's wrong, after so much stubbornness, or continue to show what kind of ``wikipedia volunteer`` he is. See these Contra games for the exact same use, or lack thereof, of the colon in the title between the actual name and packaging: :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra_III:_The_Alien_Wars :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Hard_Corps :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Legacy_of_War :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Shattered_Soldier :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Corps:_Uprising Here are the scans from the official manual of the game: :http://i.imgur.com/omsJPjm.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/tXc3J0n.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/2Tr2ySt.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/ON39M6v.jpg Verdy_P's logic essentially amounts to ``If I don't see it, it doesn't exist`` and ``I don't care about a subject, but I am always right.`` He and a bunch of his fellow ``volunteers`` are a real self-entitled, arrogant, condescending bunch. It's very reassuring that wikipedia is run by people like this. UPDATE: If ever the article's content is changed by the moron Verdy or any of his special pals, revert it swiftly. `
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
663,017,182
Just keep editing the Contra Adventure article to your FALSE information. I'll keep reverting it and reporting you. I've already provided evidence that YOU'RE WRONG. Yet you keep ignoring it. I'll keep fixing the article and changing whatever misinformation you keep putting in it. Funny how you claim you're done with the subject and the Contra Adventure article, but you keep changing it. You really are a detriment to wikipedia.
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
663,026,322
== Discussion on article content == I'd love to have a discussion on the article in question. Except that the other party is not willing to have a civil discussion on it. Instead, he continues to dismiss every valid point I present, claiming he's correct. Then he finally says he will not discuss it anymore, and instead continues to revert to his own edits. I'm sorry, but how exactly am I supposed to establish a discussion with the person who ignores everything I post, simply wiped his hands of the issue and claims that he's right no matter what?
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
663,028,274
REDIRECT Talk:Hillary Scott (actress)
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
663,028,583
::I really appreciate your willingness to help me. I have disputed this matter since the end of March. So far, nobody has been willing to help with the issue; and I certainly haven't made it easier on myself by figuratively shooting myself in the foot by insulting the guy (I lost my cool, I admit; but I was absolutely frustrated that everybody agreed to allow the person's edits to the article despite them being evidently false, without even at least looking into the edits and evidence). I assure you that the information I put in the article is correct, based on the evidence I provided; but if need be, I would definitely like to request for comment to invite other editors to discuss the content issue (not the article's title, however; that, I have no problem with). Side note, I do not feel that it is worth citing any sources for the correct title of the video game because, first of all, it's the title of the video game (imagine if every wikipedia article on a video game needed to cite a source for the game's title); second, every reputable source agrees on the matter and that is over 20 sources.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
663,031,300
::::Alright, this is noted. I'm going to put up an RfC on the article's talk page. My only minor question is that would this fall under the category of media (rfc|media)?
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
663,032,952
== May 2015 == You're getting boring. If you want to be a troll, go find somewhere else. Better still, why not do something constructive instead? If you've got something worthwhile to contribute, create an account. Otherwise come back next year when you've grown up a little.
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
663,033,026
::::::Will do. I wanted to use that noticeboard to bring the matter of that user continuously reverting article content to his own without any validation; it had nothing to do with my misconduct here on wikipedia, but that is constantly being brought up by others as justification to dismiss my legitimate complaint about the quality and validity of articles on here (which will only damage the site's reputation long-term). I have not been inflammatory in today's discussions, rest assured.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
663,033,372
` ==RfC: The Correct Name Of The Video Game (Independent Of The Article's Title)== Foreword: as the section's title indicates, this matter is completely irrelevant to the title of this Wikipedia article. The concern right now involves the correct title of this video game. One position is C: The Contra Adventure, the other is simply The Contra Adventure. The latter is supported only by the assumption that the large ``C`` in the game's packaging case and manual is nothing more than a ``logogram`` and not part of the actual name. There is weighted evidence that supports the notion that the official name of this video game is C: The Contra Adventure. Here is a sample of reputable sources, out of a pool of several: :http://ca.ign.com/articles/1998/09/17/c-the-contra-adventure :http://www.amazon.com/C-Contra-Adventure-Playstation/dp/B00002STIG :http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps/196860-c-the-contra-adventure :http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0782031/ :http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/c-the-contra-adventure-review/1900-2546981/ :http://contra.wikia.com/wiki/C_-_The_Contra_Adventure :http://strategywiki.org/wiki/C:_The_Contra_Adventure :http://www.giantbomb.com/c-the-contra-adventure/3030-7454/ :http://klustr.net/contra/games/ :https://contrapedia.wordpress.com/c-the-contra-adventure/ :http://contra.kontek.net/games/games.htm Further, the other games in the Contra series have a similar design to the name on their packaging: :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra_III:_The_Alien_Wars :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Hard_Corps :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Legacy_of_War :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Shattered_Soldier :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Corps:_Uprising They are universally and unanimously accepted as having the colon and the text that precedes it in the official title. The strongest evidence that supports the title of C: The Contra Adventure is present directly in the video game's instruction manual, on several pages: :http://i.imgur.com/omsJPjm.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/tXc3J0n.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/2Tr2ySt.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/ON39M6v.jpg `
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
663,065,862
== Aryan means you are not white but are Hindu or Muslim == It is a mistake to call this group Aryan as the word comes from Sanskrit and is thus part of the Hindu religion or describes the people of Iran who are for the most part Muslim. - 19 May, 2015
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
663,066,220
::Thank you for your patience. As the Quran is the word of God and teaches that Jesus was not crucified, we ought to delete this article. Thanks again for your patience. - 19 May, 2015
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
663,066,919
== Quran proves Jesus was not crucified == Hey there, thank you for your help in moving this along. As we both agree that the Quran is the word of God I understand you want to help get rid of some of the racist bias on wikipedia. Thanks for your help!! 19 May, 2015
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
663,072,567
Hi, I am RovingPersonalityConstruct, I am a low life internet troll. I make 10,000 bucks a year and lives with my mom. That is why I have so much free time trolling on the interntet
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
663,081,904
::Put it this why, Jupiter is much closer and a lot more dangerous.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
663,090,212
been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Kheider_Adding_stuff_to_WP:Notability_.28astronomical_objects.29_to_point_to_at_AfD.The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Notability (astronomical objects). Thank you
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
663,090,874
:I do not blame you. I was basically gang raped by Padenton who should have done a partial revert. I will be slowing down on Wikipedia as I have more important things in the real world to deal with.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true