dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
667,201,432	:I think it should be FInal Fantasy VII (2017) instead of (remake).	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,201,816	` == A barnstar for you! you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia , == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Barnstar of Diligence \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| I just had a chance to see what you've done to the high-speed trading article over the past several months, and was very impressed. I too get in trouble for trying to fight COI issues and it's good to see that your trouble was only temporary. \|} you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia ,`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,202,032	` == A barnstar for you!== you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia , == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Barnstar of Diligence \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| I just had a chance to see what you've done to the high-speed trading article over the past several months, and was very impressed. I too get in trouble for trying to fight COI issues and it's good to see that your trouble was only temporary. \|} you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia ,`	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
667,202,315	` :::Okay well this book was published before his trial and him being ``discredited``. Doesn't that make it a reliable source? It's not the book he was sued for, that was ``Hitler's war``, published after the book being reviewed. Just to make it clear I'm not trying to whitewash the Nazis or anything and say they didn't commit war crimes, obviously they did. I am just trying to make sure both sides of an academic issue are presented. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
667,204,200	` == Narendra Modi is not authorative source of History == Narendra Modi is famous for slip-ups and wrong statements. * http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/narendra-modi-s-mistakes-give-foes-chance-to-teach-him-history/article1-1145612.aspx * http://indiatoday.intoday.in/gallery/narendra-modis-11-mistakes/1/11746.html * http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-must-guard-against-more-slip-ups-feels-party/articleshow/25606731.cms * http://www.mensxp.com/special-features/lok-sabha-elections-2014/22381-top-10-embarrassing-goofups-by-narendra-modi.html * http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pm-modis-nepal-slip-in-bhutan-fires-up-twitter-578510 Lets end this discussion. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,212,861	== Mount Everest == If it's a scientific fact that Mount Everest got shorter, give the direct scientific source. The CBS article had only one source - the very page you removed as the one that did NOT mention it.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,219,349	:: No, it's not better. You added another news source. I'm pretty sure if the tallest mountain in the world DID shrink, it would be a huge thing in the scientific world. Yet, the height of Mount Everest in all possible scientific sources remains the same. FYI, satellites cannot measure with accuracy of more than 10 cm, and mountain heights are measured in whole meters, not in cm. You can continue your war or find a proper source.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
667,220,296	Retired\|date=June 2015\|reason=due to on- and off-wiki WP:Harassment and WP:Outing	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
667,235,736	==WHAT THE HECK?!== Why does the controversy keep getting removed?!? The sources were there, the controversy was real, THERE WAS NO REASON TO GET RID OF IT! By getting rid of the controversy, you are showing bias by pretending that there is none. Also, the controversy section included WHY HE GOT SUED FOR THE DEATH OF SOMEONE, instead of blindly stating so with no explanation.	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
667,241,718	` ****``You ought to be careful with what you say.`` No, I don't. Get over it. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,247,338	` :::Worth considering perhaps- I've got a thing somewhere on the political-weighting of language- might have relevance in that regard? '''''''''' `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
667,316,292	` ::::::And ``clan chief`` is a generic position and is not capitalised in this context. Please do not capitalise this or any another other generic position names again from now on otherwise you will again engage us both in conflict and edit wars. The MOS is very clear on this matter regardless of the mistaken ``vanity capitalisation`` customs of many organisations. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
667,330,725	:Bullshit, ripe and steaming.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
667,366,843	` ::::: That's a personal attack. You indulge it because you know you can get away with it. You get it away with it because indeed you edit Wikipedia 7/24. I suggest it's only because I put you on the spot that you respond now. You're entitled to your view that I'm infantile and attention seeking, but not to propagate it in this way. If you want ``infantile``, I suggest you look at from an editor here who runs his his Talk page as some sort of an art club (compare that with the scholarly notes the uploader took the time to provide at Commons). As for ``attention-seeking``, it is precisely because I seek to avoid attention that I do not operate a Wikipedia account. I contribute regularly to Wikipedia on a (UK) BT internet IP - that is a shared dynamic address which is regularly changed by them (and every time I re-power my system) so my edit history, which would identify me immediately, is concealed. And in truth there are no shortage of infantile and attention-seeking editors at Wikipedia in any case. ::::: Of course that sentence should be removed from the lead. As for conspiracy theories, this is Strauss-Kahn's BLP and the plausible theory that he was set up for the event that now defines him in the eyes of the world, for a while anyway believed by a majority of French citizens, should be mentioned in it. ::::: It's clear to me that the management of this page is not fit for purpose. I shall apply for its protection to be removed. As is is so often the case, the cure is plainly worse than the disease. You might care to atone for you gratuitous attack by telling me who the administrator is who protected the page in the first place. I need to apply to them as a first step. `	2,015	false	article	random	dev	false
667,373,291	::The article needs to be restored to the original from to be about the grocery store chain, and a new article created about the ownership group. Per the company's website, the holding company was formed as Bi-Lo Holdings in 2012, and renamed Southeastern Grocers in 2015. -	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
667,378,896	`::::Bodu Bala Sena is the latest incarnation of Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism that has since independence targeted the island's ethnic minorities. First of all it was the Indian Tamils, then it was the Sri Lankan Tamils, now it's the turn of the Muslims.obi2canibetalk contr Ado nikan puka nodi palayanko , Thoge eelam tamil paradila wikipedia eka renna enna, thawa uba monawada illanne? Hambayo gena api balaganna indiyan katha wedak ne adu kule wesige putha tho Norway gihin slavery karapan, thota Lankawe inna be, `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
667,385,614	` == Hello Machan! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| My Pleasure \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| It's my pleasure to corporate with you ion your modest work in safeguarding the Sinhalese culture and ethics. Talk to me anytime. \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
667,402,021	In addition, the genitive	2,015	false	article	random	train	false
667,416,072	:Also, he didn't win the Premier League, because to get a medal you need to make a certain number (8?) appearances, same for the League Cup. There's been discussions about it before at WT:FOOTY, which is the Wikiproject about football, and consensus was that people that didn't play aren't considered winners.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,427,275	` : Done — '''''''''' `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
667,440,793	:::You talking about this stuff?(Revision as of 19:41, 30 April 2013)	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
667,444,650	==so what do we call the City of Toronto between 1954 and 1998?==	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
667,445,627	==What was the size/area of pre-amalgamation Hamilton?== Where could one get the information? They seem to have for Old Toronto.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
667,447,719	` :: This is a relatively new website, but pardon if I'm mistaking; Randi Harper is the CEO of OAPI (correct?) This same Randi Harper has been accused of abuse, bullying & harassment by another Online Abuse Prevention Website STGRB - Stop The GR Bullies: Harper organized a revolt to write ``bad reviews`` of Amazon books by authors Harper didn't like - She contacted Amazon directly through her OAPI website to get several books (from authors she didn't like) pulled from Amazon. It was first made public by Anne Rice; 'Interview With The Vampire' author & supporter of STGRB through her Facebook Account and continued updates through her Twitter Account. Harper rallied her Twitter followers to publicly attack Rice and write articles in gossip websites bluntly lying that Anne Rice is the harasser. I think it would be best to remove the WIKI Online 'Abuse Prevention Initiative' entry (at least) until OAPI actually establishes itself, because (1) this could be construed as advertisement, (2) we're promoting Harper's repeated hostilities, and (3) we're certain to see rampant vandalism in response to this WIKI. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,451,327	Krimuk or Katrina Mukti D'Souza you are jealous because Priyanka Chopra did not suck your cock. Every other heroine has sucked your cock so you write article on them. No????? Priyanka is very decent girl and she refuse yours.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	true
667,477,860	== What Makes A Person Wikipedia-Notable, Taber Gregory (Canada Scoops Victim Placed in USA) == I'm going through Wikipedia's criteria for 'Notable' and except that he does not have multiple secondary sources reporting on the event that makes him 'significant' 'notable' 'worthy of notice' note worthy', Taber Gregory certainly does fit Wikipedia's criteria of 'Notable.' Taber Gregory is the 1st and only victim of Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops to be recognized by the recently concluded Truth & Reconciliation Commission - Canada. Wikipedia deems Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops noteworthy, and Truth & Reconciliation Commission - Canada note worthy, but not a unique and leading individual within those events? Taber Gregory achieving that level of recognition is certainly note worthy, it's so note worthy that after he used that TRC-Canada recognition to achieve his USA Citizenship on basis of being a victim of the genocide-Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops, the mandate of TRC-Canada was edited to preclude all other victims of Canada Scoops who were not kept within Canada but who were instead placed in USA and west Europe from being recognized by this TRC-Canada. So would you pleas stop editing him out of Notable Residents of Wilton, Connecticut already. This is like a senseless tug of war.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,483,857	`:::::::Well naval air squadrons are a bit schizophrenic. They are really just administrative arrangements but they also have an identity like any other naval unit such as a ship and is thought of that way. In other words a squadron's identity still exists even when it is not currently in commission. The idea of simply transferring squadron identities in this way would be entirely natural. To do anything else would have seemed perverse. Remember that, at that time, the RAN was much more closely aligned with the RN. The RAN had sent VAT Smith over to the UK to prosecute the case for what really amounted to buying a fleet air arm. The RN had all these squadron's lying around doing nothing with their identities intact and just needing re-commissioning. Why would they want to create more? It would have been seen as akin to not completing the Majestics and ordering the constriction of completely new hulls to the same design instead.BTW there were differences between the squadrons in RN and RAN service - under the British system squadron's starting with an 8 were front line squadron's whilst those starting with 7 were second line. My father, who was part of the loan program of men and materials to the RAN in the 50s, tells of his disappointment on discovering that his posting to 851 was not to a front line squadron. As an aside I believe he and I were the first father and son to serve as aircrew officers on the same Australian naval air squadron. My claim to fame. - `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,507,183	::: Happy to hear that. ) AB	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,524,375	` == Scientists Discuss ``Evolution`` == “My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of paleobiological facts. The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief”. (Nils Heribert Nilsson, noted Swedish botanist and geneticist, of Lund University and evolutionist). “I think in fifty years, Darwinian evolution will be gone from the science curriculum. I think people will look back on it and ask how anyone could, in their right mind, have believed this, because it's so implausible when you look at the evidence”. (Johnathan Wells, 'Icons of Evolution'). “I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research program”. (Karl Popper, German born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize winner Peter Medawar, 'Incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived'). “Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever! In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact”. (Newton Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission). “The pathetic thing about it is that many scientists are trying to prove the doctrine of evolution, which no science can do”. (Robert A. Milikan, physicist by provision and a Nobel Prize winner, speech before the American Chemical Society). “The miracles required to make evolution feasible are far greater in number and far harder to believe than the miracle of creation”. (Richard Bliss, former professor of biology and science education as Christian Heritage College, ‘It Takes a Miracle for Evolution). “The only competing explanation for the order we all see in the biological world is the notion of special creation”. (Colin Patterson, evolutionist and senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, which houses more than 60.000.000 fossils). “Evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless”. (Prof. Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). “All of us who study the origin of life find that the more we look into it, the more we feel it is too complex to have evolved anywhere. We all believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just that life’s complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did”. (Dr. Harold Urey, Nobel Prize winner). “A growing number of respectable scientists are defecting from the evolutionist camp, moreover, for the most part these ‘Experts’ have abandoned Darwinism, not on the basis of religious faith or biblical persuasions, but on strictly scientific grounds, and in some instances, regretfully”. (Dr. Wolfgang Smith, physicist and mathematician). “The evolution theory is purely the product of the imagination”. (Dr. Ambrose Flemming, Pres. Philosophical Society of United Kingdom). “I have always been slightly suspicious of the theory of evolution because of its ability to account for any property of living beings. I have therefore tried to see whether biological discoveries over the last thirty years or so fit in with Darwin’s theory. I do not think that they do. To my mind, the theory does not stand up at all”. (H. Lipson, “A Physicist Looks at Evolution“, Physic Bulletin, Page 138). “The talk of evolution is sheer nonsense not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by fact. This Museum is full of proof of the utter falsity of their view”. (Niles Ethredge, British Museum of Science). “(Evolution is) a great cosmologic myth of the twentieth century”. (Michael Denton, molecular biochemist, ‘Evolution, Theory in Crisis’). “The evolutionary establishment fears creation science, because evolution itself crumbles when challenged by evidence. In the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds of public debates were arranged between evolutionary scientists and creation scientists. The latter scored resounding victories, with the result that, today, few evolutionists will debate. Isaac Asimov, Stephen Jay Gould, and the late Carl Sagan, while highly critical of creationism, all declined to debate”. (James Perloff, ‘Tornado in a Junkyard’, This book was published in the year 1999, Page 241). “Evolution is faith, a religion”. (Louis T. More, professor of paleontology at Princeton University). “Evolution is baseless and quite incredible”. (John Ambrose, ‘The Unleashing of Evolutionary Thought’). “Darwinism itself has become a religion”. (Norman Macbeth). “There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the theory of evolution”. (Cecil Wakely). “It must be signi	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
667,532,576	, I suggest a link in the text, it has probably now reached the point that some English speakers have never heard this usage.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
667,537,346	== Disputed tag == Hey, please don't do this. You need to understand what the disputed tag is meant for. Nothing has been disputed. -	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,538,494	U have nothing better 2 do than hate? That saddens me. Im surrounded by love Im sorry 4 whatever happened 2 make u so bitter.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
667,539,452	OH MY FUCKING GOD THEY BLOKED ME WHAT IM GONNA DO WITH MY OTHER 10 WIKIPEDIA ACCOUNTS (	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
667,541,680	:: That seems too vague. The claim that the law precluded screening has also been disputed. I think this needs a little more detail to satisfy both NPOV and general encyclopedic interest.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
667,562,443	Is that a problem? i doubt anyone would reply to that and i am replying to clear confusions further readers may have.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,576,809	was deleted by , not me,	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
667,588,695	== Hi, Sgvrfjs == Thank you for your very kind message on my talk page. I am also interested in classical music. I looked at your version of The Wood Nymph before anyone else edited it here and your work-in-progress on The Oceanides in your . As is, both are better than the average English Wikipedia article in writing quality and content. Wikipedia needs more editors like you. However, you must understand that at its core Wikipedia is a wiki that is (ideally) written collaboratively. No one owns an article on Wikipedia, no matter how much work an individual put into it. No one can expect their work to remain as first written. Some edits will improve the article, some will make it worse, some are deliberate vandalism (usually infantile rather than malicious)—but usually articles tend to improve over time. Where editors disagree about something in an article, the consensus prevails. An edit is not the equivalent of a teacher, or professor, marking up your paper. Wikipedia's culture does not respect authority, academic degrees, or formal achievements. English Wikipedia does not prefer any particular variety of the English language, although an article should consistently use the same variety. Wikipedia has a guideline on using and resolving disputes concerning varieties of English. Wikipedia's style is loosely governed by its own Manual of Style. Some oddities in the Manual of Style reflect deliberate compromises between American English and British English where consistency is desirable. For example, article titles and section headings are capitalized according to sentence case (as in British English), but titles of English Language works use title case (as in American English). See Manual of Style § Composition titles). Some Wikipedians tend to be sticklers about matters of style; alas, I am one of those. You can avoid conflict over that by spending some time with the Manual of Style. Some Wikipedians tend to be contentions, which is a common problem in online communities; I try not to be one of those. You do not need to work on an article in your sandbox until it is a masterpiece, and that also is not the way Wikipedia operates. I suggest that you feed content into The Oceanides and other articles gradually and do your editing directly in the article. In my experience, Wikipedia works best when editors make a lot of bite-size edits, with a descriptive edit summary, rather than in big chunks. But that is just my opinion. Because of the quality of your work, you should aspire to have articles you care about promoted to Good Article and then to Featured Article. Politically, you improve your chance for promotion by editing collaboratively with others.—	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,590,844	== Abusive Administrator == This administrator is an abusive administrator and does not research pages that they edit against better educated users who have made edits. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Acroterion	2,015	false	user	random	dev	false
667,600,088	Notice to all I changed my username in accordance with wiki policies. I also archived my user talk. All former details can be found here User talk:Boskit190/Archive 1 ( ).	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
667,619,126	::::::::::If you have no choice but to use the app, I would recommend that you excuse yourself from high traffic articles while other editors are also working on them to avoid conflicts.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
667,619,685	` ::::: Eh? The ref is after ``tickets`` and before `` and``. `	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
667,627,475	` == ``Deadnaming`` == Hi Godsy, you're absolutely right that ``deadnaming`` is a neologism, but its use at Transphobia is appropriate. First of all, it's sourced. Secondly, the term is in quotation marks both in the reference and the body of our article. This is a common way of marking neologisms. A lot of transgender-related words are neologisms, of course. Note that WP:NEO does not proscribe neologisms as such; it's more about having standalone articles on neologisms. If someone were going around introducing ``deadnaming`` in other articles (e.g., ``People deadname Chelsea Manning by calling her Bradley``), that would probably not be appropriate. But since it's specifically discussed as a word at Transphobia, there's really nothing wrong with it. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,636,368	Inediblehulk, the sentiment you should be agreeeing with is that he was white, therefore his actions reflect on all white people. If the shooter were black then no-one should link him murdering people to any black people, because it's unfair to make a whole group of people responsible for the acts of one unrelated person.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,645,157	: They are just hosting the article. It doesn't mean its published by a reliable source or anything. Who is Carol McGuire? Can someone show she is a phd or a reliable source?	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
667,650,768	`> ::I think if a black South African who immigrates to the United States in the 1990s is considered African-American then Charlize Theron should also be considered African-American. I don't see the difference. Both are Americans from Africa. Neither ever lived through slavery or Jim Crow. If we are talking about distinguishing between them by color then there is ``black`` and ``white``. — Preceding unsigned comment added by	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,686,383	` ::::::The editor of the book is Dr. Timothy Miller of the University of Kansas. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
667,687,562	`== Cartakes == User Cartakes has started Original Researching again. If you recall, he was active on Mongols and Mongolic peoples; you reverted his change of Mongolic peoples from a disambig to a page as OR, and he's doing it again, claiming it's been ``three days`` and no one else has commented. He's difficult to work with as he keeps saying he thinks one thing while editing in a way that shows he does not at all believe what he says. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,689,486	` ::::Honestly, I was always under the impression that ``Mongol`` and ``Mongolic`` were interchangeable terms in light of the fact that the modern-day Mongols are an extremely homogeneous group, a la the Arabs and Turkic peoples. The differences between ``German`` and ``Germanic``, for example, are far greater than the differences between ``Turk`` and ``Turkic``. Likewise, when it comes to the Mongols, the terms ``Mongol`` and ``Mongolic`` aren't really meant to have different meanings since the Mongols are extremely homogeneous. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,697,657	== Quick question == Pardon the IP. I edit mostly from my cell phone. Anyway, I've been around awhile and I've noticed that every year, in the spring, you disappear for several months at a time. Obviously you don't have to tell me this, but I'm curious as to the reason for this. Are you a tax accountant? (That would be my guess.) Are you visiting friends or family in another country? Or do you just get burned out from being on here and designate yourself an annual break? I'm not expecting a response any time soon, as you're currently in the middle of one of the aforementioned breaks. Ultimately you don't even have to reply at all. If you would, though, I'd very much appreciate it. Thanks.	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
667,746,095	You're very enthusiastic about this claim, but your accusations need sourcing.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
667,748,639	` : There are other ways to source besides pointing to Reddit chatter. Reddit users have been very clear on their disapproval of the new CEO, it isn't an internet secret; It's global news at-this-point - with updates every few hours regarding the discrimination lawsuit. This SOURCE is only 1 day old; Two general partners at the venture capital firm (John Doerr and Beth Seidenberg) interviews about the gender-discrimination lawsuit. You can add it to the WIKI. It mentions there was a very good work relation ship with Ellen Pao while she was Chief of Staff. A relationship trusting enough to promote Ellen Pao to an partnership/investor. It's a situation that didn't work out and left some hurt feelings in the process. Some of you are complaining about ``intense criticism`` in the WIKI, but these are direct NEWS sources. A growing number of news sources, illustrating the story. I for one have to agree with the court's decision & consensus on this issue; This is obviously not Gender Discrimination and Ellen Pao is not a victim. So why debate that fact? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,750,119	` == Popular Front of India == Interested users are requested to look at the latest edit war in Popular Front of India. Thanks. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
667,771,862	(perceptual, motor, attentional)	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
667,784,043	` == Edit warring == `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,788,701	` == June 2015 == You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RishabhCine. Thank you. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,788,765	` == June 2015 == You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RishabhCine. Thank you. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,789,019	` == is back == Hi. User RishabhCine, who was blocked is now socking. Just thought you would be interested in the case. Cheers! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,789,332	` :You may also be interested in this discussion. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,807,895	` == Tag for linkrot == Hi, You tagged the article I created by extracting data from another article I rewrote for ``linkrot``. The article is List of banks in Saudi Arabia. I was first thinking this was done by a bot, but it seems you're telling here it's not the case. (i had a look at other articles of lists of banks and changed numbered lists to bulleted lists to be like other similar pages) As a new wikipedia contributor, maybe there is something I'm missing ? It's a list of banks, so obviously there will be a list of URLS, like all the other lists of banks in a specific country. Any information is welcomed, thank you. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,822,960	How sad !!!!	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
667,829,517	You have fucking asperger's man.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
667,832,480	OK, I will send all of Russia.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,847,524	` ``Who is saying it should stay aside from you? BlusterBlaster seemed to accept the edits. Also read the added paragraph, keeping both sentences would be redundancy.`` You have not responded to this sentence. Please be clear with communicating as you continue to ignore specifics and generalize. Participate in responding to specific points. Like what do you actually think of me adding that mobile paragraph with the intention of replacing the thing you added? Why aren't you ok with it? What do you think would be better for it?`	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
667,851,859	`I am going to develop this page soon. Don't redirect or nominate for deletion. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
667,858,811	` ::Haha, for a moment I was like ``what did I do..``? D `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
667,871,062	so we can have a better understanding of how you propose this should fit into the section, what is being demonstrated by the addition of this line? It seems in some ways open-ended or otherwise without a main point. In other words, what is the significance of this statistic?	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
667,884,452	REDIRECT Talk:Berth Milton, Sr.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
667,918,150	== Guess what == The tories won and IT IS ALL YOUR FAULT. if you had caused this story to dominate the headlines the results would have been entirely different	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
667,920,613	== C (New York City Subway service) == Stop adding so much unnecessary edits to the C train article. I don't know why you're going into more detail about the R32s. It's just a damn train. Nobody cares how often a train breaks down or whatever issues it has. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a Mean Distance Between Failures figure about how often any train break downs or whatever. Besides, the C train and the R32 car articles already mentions the breakdown rates anyway, just in a more subtle way. All it matters is just simply saying that the R32s were moved to outdoor lines to save their aging air compressors from having to work underground all the time. That's it. There's no need to mention what kind of issues the cars themselves have nor how they are/were solved. At least, in my book, your edits to the C train article were either completely over-opinionated, unsourced, or both, and thus, are not needed to mention. It's not like you work for the MTA anyway, so don't speculate about railcar maintenance, inspection or issues. If you don't work for the MTA and therefore, have no experience about the inner workings within the transit agency itself at all, by all means, stay silent, sit back, and relax.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
667,933,380	` ::I think my top 10 would include Satyajit Ray, Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, and Woody Allen as well. More mainstream choices, I think. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
667,933,686	` :::::Never seen it! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
667,934,874	: Sorry for engaging in an edit war and thank you for reminding me of this. I thought that consensus was not reached so was not appropriate for Abierma3 to remove the material. I will try to engage in discussion with Abierma3 to try and sort out the issue.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,940,170	Fartsalot56 says f**k you motherclucker!!	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
667,940,454	== Yeah == User:Smalljim sucks big fat chode!!	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
667,957,186	:You may upload a photo here . More information is available at Wikipedia:Uploading images.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
667,961,174	::: As you might already know, the discussion on the Talk: Race (human classification) page has become heated again, with editors having very different views on what the lead definition should be. I have tried really hard to reach out to another longtime editor but I have not been successful. I'm not claiming that the views of one editor trumps another. But I do want to express my concern that once the protection status of that page has been lifted, there might be potential edit conflicts. I really don't think this is productive and I really believe consensus is important so that any major edit would be lasting. My view on the matter is that at a minimum, there should be an RfC or similar, and that no edits should be done until consensus is reached. Ideally, more editors should be involved in the discussions. I welcome any advice you might have on this matter. Thanks.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
667,966,434	:* Yes absolutely. Thanks a lot. Regards.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
667,969,864	NBC has unleashed the show art for the series, I think the image needs to be updated to include all main cast members, google, Chicago Med Show art, its an image of the group together in the ER	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
667,970,561	http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vg6JFoMT-rU/VXsXZVG1yHI/AAAAAAAARI0/uq_ezjbivCE/s1600/NUP_169329_0001%2B%2Bchicago%2Bmed%2Bkey%2Bart%2Biliketowatchtvblogspot.JPG heres the link to the image, which is free, I don't exactly know how to update images.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
667,970,960	Anything posted on the internet is free to use, a description of the show? really? there going to come after wikipedia for giving actual information	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
667,971,551	== QUIT EDITING CHICAGO MED == YOU ARE SO STUPID, HOW CAN SOMEONE POST ON HERE AND GET IT VERFIED WITHOUT YOU CHANGING IT, INFORMATION POSTED ON HERE THATS CITED IS NOT COPYRIGHT. ARE YOU FROM AMERICA U IDIOT GET A LIFE. STOP RUINGING CHICAGO MEDS PAGE	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
667,971,922	` == QUIT EDITING CHICAGO MED == YOU ARE SO STUPID, HOW CAN SOMEONE POST ON HERE AND GET IT VERFIED WITHOUT YOU CHANGING IT, INFORMATION POSTED ON HERE THATS CITED IS NOT COPYRIGHT. ARE YOU FROM AMERICA U IDIOT GET A LIFE. STOP RUINGING CHICAGO MEDS PAGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by `	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
667,987,007	== Nigerian == I have reason to believe you are Nigerian. Yuck.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
668,004,087	I don't give a flying fuck about wiki and I am sure telling you that will get another of your petty bans. My fiancee has maybe another year of life before she is murdered. It may be you are another self-important wiki masturbator or you are part of the conspiracy to have her isolated and murdered. Who gives a fuck what you wankers decide it's only wiki. Now piss off and go edit model railways or whatever else you do you disgusting little creep.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
668,011,966	::: Awright then. Will now be done.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
668,013,914	: No, I got it now. Because I thought the Y indicated a team that could finish 3rd or lower, regardless to whether 3rd place guaranteed a knockout stage qualification or not. You explained nicely where I got it wrong though. Now I see, there is no necessity for any letter.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
668,032,164	` ::::::Thanks Marnette. ) Oh yes, definitely Chaplin! And Doctor, yes, Alexander Payne is marvelous. Among others, I also admire Todd Haynes and David Fincher. Steven Spielberg and James Cameron's vision are worth admiring as well. In India, apart from Ray, Shyam Benegal, Rituparno Ghosh, and Vishal Bhardwaj would feature in my top 10. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
668,033,826	== HEY! == Stop deleting my Looney Tunes VHS/Laserdisc articles! They deserved to be noticed! Copyright or not! Just leave them alone! And if you don't listen to reason, I'll just keep re-adding them!	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
668,048,847	::Concerning your last sentence, what you're describing is not vandalism per WP:VAND. Just because something can be cited does not mean it is appropriate for an article, thus removing it is not vandalism just because it is cited. -	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
668,062,373	the Coen brothers; the last two specifically for the flawless ambiance they create in their films	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
668,065,586	HAVE A NICE DAY !	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
668,128,053	IMDB IS THE ONE WHO CAN WRITE IN NOT LIKE YOU BITCHES WHO NOT CAN TRUST TO, FUCK YOU SOON NO ONE WOULD WRITE ON YOUR FUCKING WIKIPEDIA EVEN IF YOU LICK OUR ASS !!!!!!!!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
668,129,953	== Cancelled == The Disney archive website is actually a very reliable and respected animation site for all the cancelled movies. It's very interesting and it deserves to stay there.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
668,148,941	I'm made of dollar store scrubby pads and cheap rubbing alcohol.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
668,149,041	Right up there with make believe universities, eh? ::	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
668,154,182	Did you quit like you said you would if anyone told you what to do or were you forced out for incompetence with Flow aka liquid threads 3? kiss:	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
668,165,659	Hi Sam! How's wikipedia going?	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
668,187,170	* I would agree with Gerda that an infobox would be appropriate and a benefit to the article. I disagree Opus33...for far too long, various people, especially on classical music articles, have used those tired arguments to thwart useful infoboxes. The claims of redundancy and aesthetics smack of a subjective WP:IDONTLIKEIT resistence.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
668,188,462	`Don't know how concisely stating essential information can be in any way hutful...not like the article has screamed out ``ouch``. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
668,208,719	What a load of bollocks. : So Mr Bernstein is making COI edits? How terrible, you'll be accusing him of using one of Wikipedia's most high traffic pages to spam his own blog next. Oh, wait... ::	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false

667,201,432

:I think it should be FInal Fantasy VII (2017) instead of (remake).

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,201,816

` == A barnstar for you! you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia , == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Barnstar of Diligence |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I just had a chance to see what you've done to the high-speed trading article over the past several months, and was very impressed. I too get in trouble for trying to fight COI issues and it's good to see that your trouble was only temporary. |} you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia ,`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,202,032

` == A barnstar for you!== you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia , == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Barnstar of Diligence |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I just had a chance to see what you've done to the high-speed trading article over the past several months, and was very impressed. I too get in trouble for trying to fight COI issues and it's good to see that your trouble was only temporary. |} you are just amazing at staking i retired from wikipedia ,`

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

667,202,315

` :::Okay well this book was published before his trial and him being ``discredited``. Doesn't that make it a reliable source? It's not the book he was sued for, that was ``Hitler's war``, published after the book being reviewed. Just to make it clear I'm not trying to whitewash the Nazis or anything and say they didn't commit war crimes, obviously they did. I am just trying to make sure both sides of an academic issue are presented. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

667,204,200

` == Narendra Modi is not authorative source of History == Narendra Modi is famous for slip-ups and wrong statements. * http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/narendra-modi-s-mistakes-give-foes-chance-to-teach-him-history/article1-1145612.aspx * http://indiatoday.intoday.in/gallery/narendra-modis-11-mistakes/1/11746.html * http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-must-guard-against-more-slip-ups-feels-party/articleshow/25606731.cms * http://www.mensxp.com/special-features/lok-sabha-elections-2014/22381-top-10-embarrassing-goofups-by-narendra-modi.html * http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pm-modis-nepal-slip-in-bhutan-fires-up-twitter-578510 Lets end this discussion. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,212,861

== Mount Everest == If it's a scientific fact that Mount Everest got shorter, give the direct scientific source. The CBS article had only one source - the very page you removed as the one that did NOT mention it.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,219,349

:: No, it's not better. You added another news source. I'm pretty sure if the tallest mountain in the world DID shrink, it would be a huge thing in the scientific world. Yet, the height of Mount Everest in all possible scientific sources remains the same. FYI, satellites cannot measure with accuracy of more than 10 cm, and mountain heights are measured in whole meters, not in cm. You can continue your war or find a proper source.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

667,220,296

Retired|date=June 2015|reason=due to on- and off-wiki WP:Harassment and WP:Outing

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

667,235,736

==WHAT THE HECK?!== Why does the controversy keep getting removed?!? The sources were there, the controversy was real, THERE WAS NO REASON TO GET RID OF IT! By getting rid of the controversy, you are showing bias by pretending that there is none. Also, the controversy section included WHY HE GOT SUED FOR THE DEATH OF SOMEONE, instead of blindly stating so with no explanation.

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

667,241,718

` ****``You ought to be careful with what you say.`` No, I don't. Get over it. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,247,338

` :::Worth considering perhaps- I've got a thing somewhere on the political-weighting of language- might have relevance in that regard? '''''''''' `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

667,316,292

` ::::::And ``clan chief`` is a generic position and is not capitalised in this context. Please do not capitalise this or any another other generic position names again from now on otherwise you will again engage us both in conflict and edit wars. The MOS is very clear on this matter regardless of the mistaken ``vanity capitalisation`` customs of many organisations. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

667,330,725

:Bullshit, ripe and steaming.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

667,366,843

` ::::: That's a personal attack. You indulge it because you know you can get away with it. You get it away with it because indeed you edit Wikipedia 7/24. I suggest it's only because I put you on the spot that you respond now. You're entitled to your view that I'm infantile and attention seeking, but not to propagate it in this way. If you want ``infantile``, I suggest you look at from an editor here who runs his his Talk page as some sort of an art club (compare that with the scholarly notes the uploader took the time to provide at Commons). As for ``attention-seeking``, it is precisely because I seek to avoid attention that I do not operate a Wikipedia account. I contribute regularly to Wikipedia on a (UK) BT internet IP - that is a shared dynamic address which is regularly changed by them (and every time I re-power my system) so my edit history, which would identify me immediately, is concealed. And in truth there are no shortage of infantile and attention-seeking editors at Wikipedia in any case. ::::: Of course that sentence should be removed from the lead. As for conspiracy theories, this is Strauss-Kahn's BLP and the plausible theory that he was set up for the event that now defines him in the eyes of the world, for a while anyway believed by a majority of French citizens, should be mentioned in it. ::::: It's clear to me that the management of this page is not fit for purpose. I shall apply for its protection to be removed. As is is so often the case, the cure is plainly worse than the disease. You might care to atone for you gratuitous attack by telling me who the administrator is who protected the page in the first place. I need to apply to them as a first step. `

2,015

false

article

random

dev

false

667,373,291

::The article needs to be restored to the original from to be about the grocery store chain, and a new article created about the ownership group. Per the company's website, the holding company was formed as Bi-Lo Holdings in 2012, and renamed Southeastern Grocers in 2015. -

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

667,378,896

`::::Bodu Bala Sena is the latest incarnation of Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism that has since independence targeted the island's ethnic minorities. First of all it was the Indian Tamils, then it was the Sri Lankan Tamils, now it's the turn of the Muslims.obi2canibetalk contr Ado nikan puka nodi palayanko , Thoge eelam tamil paradila wikipedia eka renna enna, thawa uba monawada illanne? Hambayo gena api balaganna indiyan katha wedak ne adu kule wesige putha tho Norway gihin slavery karapan, thota Lankawe inna be, `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

667,385,614

` == Hello Machan! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | My Pleasure |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | It's my pleasure to corporate with you ion your modest work in safeguarding the Sinhalese culture and ethics. Talk to me anytime. |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

667,402,021

In addition, the genitive

2,015

false

article

random

train

false

667,416,072

:Also, he didn't win the Premier League, because to get a medal you need to make a certain number (8?) appearances, same for the League Cup. There's been discussions about it before at WT:FOOTY, which is the Wikiproject about football, and consensus was that people that didn't play aren't considered winners.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,427,275

` : Done — '''''''''' `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

667,440,793

:::You talking about this stuff?(Revision as of 19:41, 30 April 2013)

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

667,444,650

==so what do we call the City of Toronto between 1954 and 1998?==

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

667,445,627

==What was the size/area of pre-amalgamation Hamilton?== Where could one get the information? They seem to have for Old Toronto.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

667,447,719

` :: This is a relatively new website, but pardon if I'm mistaking; Randi Harper is the CEO of OAPI (correct?) This same Randi Harper has been accused of abuse, bullying & harassment by another Online Abuse Prevention Website STGRB - Stop The GR Bullies: Harper organized a revolt to write ``bad reviews`` of Amazon books by authors Harper didn't like - She contacted Amazon directly through her OAPI website to get several books (from authors she didn't like) pulled from Amazon. It was first made public by Anne Rice; 'Interview With The Vampire' author & supporter of STGRB through her Facebook Account and continued updates through her Twitter Account. Harper rallied her Twitter followers to publicly attack Rice and write articles in gossip websites bluntly lying that Anne Rice is the harasser. I think it would be best to remove the WIKI Online 'Abuse Prevention Initiative' entry (at least) until OAPI actually establishes itself, because (1) this could be construed as advertisement, (2) we're promoting Harper's repeated hostilities, and (3) we're certain to see rampant vandalism in response to this WIKI. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,451,327

Krimuk or Katrina Mukti D'Souza you are jealous because Priyanka Chopra did not suck your cock. Every other heroine has sucked your cock so you write article on them. No????? Priyanka is very decent girl and she refuse yours.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

true

667,477,860

== What Makes A Person Wikipedia-Notable, Taber Gregory (Canada Scoops Victim Placed in USA) == I'm going through Wikipedia's criteria for 'Notable' and except that he does not have multiple secondary sources reporting on the event that makes him 'significant' 'notable' 'worthy of notice' note worthy', Taber Gregory certainly does fit Wikipedia's criteria of 'Notable.' Taber Gregory is the 1st and only victim of Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops to be recognized by the recently concluded Truth & Reconciliation Commission - Canada. Wikipedia deems Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops noteworthy, and Truth & Reconciliation Commission - Canada note worthy, but not a unique and leading individual within those events? Taber Gregory achieving that level of recognition is certainly note worthy, it's so note worthy that after he used that TRC-Canada recognition to achieve his USA Citizenship on basis of being a victim of the genocide-Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops, the mandate of TRC-Canada was edited to preclude all other victims of Canada Scoops who were not kept within Canada but who were instead placed in USA and west Europe from being recognized by this TRC-Canada. So would you pleas stop editing him out of Notable Residents of Wilton, Connecticut already. This is like a senseless tug of war.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,483,857

`:::::::Well naval air squadrons are a bit schizophrenic. They are really just administrative arrangements but they also have an identity like any other naval unit such as a ship and is thought of that way. In other words a squadron's identity still exists even when it is not currently in commission. The idea of simply transferring squadron identities in this way would be entirely natural. To do anything else would have seemed perverse. Remember that, at that time, the RAN was much more closely aligned with the RN. The RAN had sent VAT Smith over to the UK to prosecute the case for what really amounted to buying a fleet air arm. The RN had all these squadron's lying around doing nothing with their identities intact and just needing re-commissioning. Why would they want to create more? It would have been seen as akin to not completing the Majestics and ordering the constriction of completely new hulls to the same design instead.BTW there were differences between the squadrons in RN and RAN service - under the British system squadron's starting with an 8 were front line squadron's whilst those starting with 7 were second line. My father, who was part of the loan program of men and materials to the RAN in the 50s, tells of his disappointment on discovering that his posting to 851 was not to a front line squadron. As an aside I believe he and I were the first father and son to serve as aircrew officers on the same Australian naval air squadron. My claim to fame. - `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,507,183

::: Happy to hear that. ) AB

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,524,375

` == Scientists Discuss ``Evolution`` == “My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of paleobiological facts. The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief”. (Nils Heribert Nilsson, noted Swedish botanist and geneticist, of Lund University and evolutionist). “I think in fifty years, Darwinian evolution will be gone from the science curriculum. I think people will look back on it and ask how anyone could, in their right mind, have believed this, because it's so implausible when you look at the evidence”. (Johnathan Wells, 'Icons of Evolution'). “I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research program”. (Karl Popper, German born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize winner Peter Medawar, 'Incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived'). “Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever! In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact”. (Newton Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission). “The pathetic thing about it is that many scientists are trying to prove the doctrine of evolution, which no science can do”. (Robert A. Milikan, physicist by provision and a Nobel Prize winner, speech before the American Chemical Society). “The miracles required to make evolution feasible are far greater in number and far harder to believe than the miracle of creation”. (Richard Bliss, former professor of biology and science education as Christian Heritage College, ‘It Takes a Miracle for Evolution). “The only competing explanation for the order we all see in the biological world is the notion of special creation”. (Colin Patterson, evolutionist and senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, which houses more than 60.000.000 fossils). “Evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless”. (Prof. Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). “All of us who study the origin of life find that the more we look into it, the more we feel it is too complex to have evolved anywhere. We all believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just that life’s complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did”. (Dr. Harold Urey, Nobel Prize winner). “A growing number of respectable scientists are defecting from the evolutionist camp, moreover, for the most part these ‘Experts’ have abandoned Darwinism, not on the basis of religious faith or biblical persuasions, but on strictly scientific grounds, and in some instances, regretfully”. (Dr. Wolfgang Smith, physicist and mathematician). “The evolution theory is purely the product of the imagination”. (Dr. Ambrose Flemming, Pres. Philosophical Society of United Kingdom). “I have always been slightly suspicious of the theory of evolution because of its ability to account for any property of living beings. I have therefore tried to see whether biological discoveries over the last thirty years or so fit in with Darwin’s theory. I do not think that they do. To my mind, the theory does not stand up at all”. (H. Lipson, “A Physicist Looks at Evolution“, Physic Bulletin, Page 138). “The talk of evolution is sheer nonsense not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by fact. This Museum is full of proof of the utter falsity of their view”. (Niles Ethredge, British Museum of Science). “(Evolution is) a great cosmologic myth of the twentieth century”. (Michael Denton, molecular biochemist, ‘Evolution, Theory in Crisis’). “The evolutionary establishment fears creation science, because evolution itself crumbles when challenged by evidence. In the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds of public debates were arranged between evolutionary scientists and creation scientists. The latter scored resounding victories, with the result that, today, few evolutionists will debate. Isaac Asimov, Stephen Jay Gould, and the late Carl Sagan, while highly critical of creationism, all declined to debate”. (James Perloff, ‘Tornado in a Junkyard’, This book was published in the year 1999, Page 241). “Evolution is faith, a religion”. (Louis T. More, professor of paleontology at Princeton University). “Evolution is baseless and quite incredible”. (John Ambrose, ‘The Unleashing of Evolutionary Thought’). “Darwinism itself has become a religion”. (Norman Macbeth). “There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the theory of evolution”. (Cecil Wakely). “It must be signi

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

667,532,576

, I suggest a link in the text, it has probably now reached the point that some English speakers have never heard this usage.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

667,537,346

== Disputed tag == Hey, please don't do this. You need to understand what the disputed tag is meant for. Nothing has been disputed. -

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,538,494

U have nothing better 2 do than hate? That saddens me. Im surrounded by love Im sorry 4 whatever happened 2 make u so bitter.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

667,539,452

OH MY FUCKING GOD THEY BLOKED ME WHAT IM GONNA DO WITH MY OTHER 10 WIKIPEDIA ACCOUNTS (

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

667,541,680

:: That seems too vague. The claim that the law precluded screening has also been disputed. I think this needs a little more detail to satisfy both NPOV and general encyclopedic interest.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

667,562,443

Is that a problem? i doubt anyone would reply to that and i am replying to clear confusions further readers may have.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,576,809

was deleted by , not me,

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

667,588,695

== Hi, Sgvrfjs == Thank you for your very kind message on my talk page. I am also interested in classical music. I looked at your version of The Wood Nymph before anyone else edited it here and your work-in-progress on The Oceanides in your . As is, both are better than the average English Wikipedia article in writing quality and content. Wikipedia needs more editors like you. However, you must understand that at its core Wikipedia is a wiki that is (ideally) written collaboratively. No one owns an article on Wikipedia, no matter how much work an individual put into it. No one can expect their work to remain as first written. Some edits will improve the article, some will make it worse, some are deliberate vandalism (usually infantile rather than malicious)—but usually articles tend to improve over time. Where editors disagree about something in an article, the consensus prevails. An edit is not the equivalent of a teacher, or professor, marking up your paper. Wikipedia's culture does not respect authority, academic degrees, or formal achievements. English Wikipedia does not prefer any particular variety of the English language, although an article should consistently use the same variety. Wikipedia has a guideline on using and resolving disputes concerning varieties of English. Wikipedia's style is loosely governed by its own Manual of Style. Some oddities in the Manual of Style reflect deliberate compromises between American English and British English where consistency is desirable. For example, article titles and section headings are capitalized according to sentence case (as in British English), but titles of English Language works use title case (as in American English). See Manual of Style § Composition titles). Some Wikipedians tend to be sticklers about matters of style; alas, I am one of those. You can avoid conflict over that by spending some time with the Manual of Style. Some Wikipedians tend to be contentions, which is a common problem in online communities; I try not to be one of those. You do not need to work on an article in your sandbox until it is a masterpiece, and that also is not the way Wikipedia operates. I suggest that you feed content into The Oceanides and other articles gradually and do your editing directly in the article. In my experience, Wikipedia works best when editors make a lot of bite-size edits, with a descriptive edit summary, rather than in big chunks. But that is just my opinion. Because of the quality of your work, you should aspire to have articles you care about promoted to Good Article and then to Featured Article. Politically, you improve your chance for promotion by editing collaboratively with others.—

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,590,844

== Abusive Administrator == This administrator is an abusive administrator and does not research pages that they edit against better educated users who have made edits. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Acroterion

2,015

false

user

random

dev

false

667,600,088

Notice to all I changed my username in accordance with wiki policies. I also archived my user talk. All former details can be found here User talk:Boskit190/Archive 1 ( ).

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

667,619,126

::::::::::If you have no choice but to use the app, I would recommend that you excuse yourself from high traffic articles while other editors are also working on them to avoid conflicts.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

667,619,685

` ::::: Eh? The ref is after ``tickets`` and before `` and``. `

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

667,627,475

` == ``Deadnaming`` == Hi Godsy, you're absolutely right that ``deadnaming`` is a neologism, but its use at Transphobia is appropriate. First of all, it's sourced. Secondly, the term is in quotation marks both in the reference and the body of our article. This is a common way of marking neologisms. A lot of transgender-related words are neologisms, of course. Note that WP:NEO does not proscribe neologisms as such; it's more about having standalone articles on neologisms. If someone were going around introducing ``deadnaming`` in other articles (e.g., ``People deadname Chelsea Manning by calling her Bradley``), that would probably not be appropriate. But since it's specifically discussed as a word at Transphobia, there's really nothing wrong with it. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,636,368

Inediblehulk, the sentiment you should be agreeeing with is that he was white, therefore his actions reflect on all white people. If the shooter were black then no-one should link him murdering people to any black people, because it's unfair to make a whole group of people responsible for the acts of one unrelated person.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,645,157

: They are just hosting the article. It doesn't mean its published by a reliable source or anything. Who is Carol McGuire? Can someone show she is a phd or a reliable source?

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

667,650,768

`> ::I think if a black South African who immigrates to the United States in the 1990s is considered African-American then Charlize Theron should also be considered African-American. I don't see the difference. Both are Americans from Africa. Neither ever lived through slavery or Jim Crow. If we are talking about distinguishing between them by color then there is ``black`` and ``white``. — Preceding unsigned comment added by

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,686,383

` ::::::The editor of the book is Dr. Timothy Miller of the University of Kansas. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

667,687,562

`== Cartakes == User Cartakes has started Original Researching again. If you recall, he was active on Mongols and Mongolic peoples; you reverted his change of Mongolic peoples from a disambig to a page as OR, and he's doing it again, claiming it's been ``three days`` and no one else has commented. He's difficult to work with as he keeps saying he thinks one thing while editing in a way that shows he does not at all believe what he says. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,689,486

` ::::Honestly, I was always under the impression that ``Mongol`` and ``Mongolic`` were interchangeable terms in light of the fact that the modern-day Mongols are an extremely homogeneous group, a la the Arabs and Turkic peoples. The differences between ``German`` and ``Germanic``, for example, are far greater than the differences between ``Turk`` and ``Turkic``. Likewise, when it comes to the Mongols, the terms ``Mongol`` and ``Mongolic`` aren't really meant to have different meanings since the Mongols are extremely homogeneous. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,697,657

== Quick question == Pardon the IP. I edit mostly from my cell phone. Anyway, I've been around awhile and I've noticed that every year, in the spring, you disappear for several months at a time. Obviously you don't have to tell me this, but I'm curious as to the reason for this. Are you a tax accountant? (That would be my guess.) Are you visiting friends or family in another country? Or do you just get burned out from being on here and designate yourself an annual break? I'm not expecting a response any time soon, as you're currently in the middle of one of the aforementioned breaks. Ultimately you don't even have to reply at all. If you would, though, I'd very much appreciate it. Thanks.

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

667,746,095

You're very enthusiastic about this claim, but your accusations need sourcing.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

667,748,639

` : There are other ways to source besides pointing to Reddit chatter. Reddit users have been very clear on their disapproval of the new CEO, it isn't an internet secret; It's global news at-this-point - with updates every few hours regarding the discrimination lawsuit. This SOURCE is only 1 day old; Two general partners at the venture capital firm (John Doerr and Beth Seidenberg) interviews about the gender-discrimination lawsuit. You can add it to the WIKI. It mentions there was a very good work relation ship with Ellen Pao while she was Chief of Staff. A relationship trusting enough to promote Ellen Pao to an partnership/investor. It's a situation that didn't work out and left some hurt feelings in the process. Some of you are complaining about ``intense criticism`` in the WIKI, but these are direct NEWS sources. A growing number of news sources, illustrating the story. I for one have to agree with the court's decision & consensus on this issue; This is obviously not Gender Discrimination and Ellen Pao is not a victim. So why debate that fact? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,750,119

` == Popular Front of India == Interested users are requested to look at the latest edit war in Popular Front of India. Thanks. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

667,771,862

(perceptual, motor, attentional)

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

667,784,043

` == Edit warring == `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,788,701

` == June 2015 == You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RishabhCine. Thank you. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,788,765

` == June 2015 == You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RishabhCine. Thank you. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,789,019

` == is back == Hi. User RishabhCine, who was blocked is now socking. Just thought you would be interested in the case. Cheers! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,789,332

` :You may also be interested in this discussion. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,807,895

` == Tag for linkrot == Hi, You tagged the article I created by extracting data from another article I rewrote for ``linkrot``. The article is List of banks in Saudi Arabia. I was first thinking this was done by a bot, but it seems you're telling here it's not the case. (i had a look at other articles of lists of banks and changed numbered lists to bulleted lists to be like other similar pages) As a new wikipedia contributor, maybe there is something I'm missing ? It's a list of banks, so obviously there will be a list of URLS, like all the other lists of banks in a specific country. Any information is welcomed, thank you. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,822,960

How sad !!!!

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

667,829,517

You have fucking asperger's man.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

667,832,480

OK, I will send all of Russia.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,847,524

` ``Who is saying it should stay aside from you? BlusterBlaster seemed to accept the edits. Also read the added paragraph, keeping both sentences would be redundancy.`` You have not responded to this sentence. Please be clear with communicating as you continue to ignore specifics and generalize. Participate in responding to specific points. Like what do you actually think of me adding that mobile paragraph with the intention of replacing the thing you added? Why aren't you ok with it? What do you think would be better for it?`

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

667,851,859

`I am going to develop this page soon. Don't redirect or nominate for deletion. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

667,858,811

` ::Haha, for a moment I was like ``what did I do..``? D `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

667,871,062

so we can have a better understanding of how you propose this should fit into the section, what is being demonstrated by the addition of this line? It seems in some ways open-ended or otherwise without a main point. In other words, what is the significance of this statistic?

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

667,884,452

REDIRECT Talk:Berth Milton, Sr.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

667,918,150

== Guess what == The tories won and IT IS ALL YOUR FAULT. if you had caused this story to dominate the headlines the results would have been entirely different

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

667,920,613

== C (New York City Subway service) == Stop adding so much unnecessary edits to the C train article. I don't know why you're going into more detail about the R32s. It's just a damn train. Nobody cares how often a train breaks down or whatever issues it has. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a Mean Distance Between Failures figure about how often any train break downs or whatever. Besides, the C train and the R32 car articles already mentions the breakdown rates anyway, just in a more subtle way. All it matters is just simply saying that the R32s were moved to outdoor lines to save their aging air compressors from having to work underground all the time. That's it. There's no need to mention what kind of issues the cars themselves have nor how they are/were solved. At least, in my book, your edits to the C train article were either completely over-opinionated, unsourced, or both, and thus, are not needed to mention. It's not like you work for the MTA anyway, so don't speculate about railcar maintenance, inspection or issues. If you don't work for the MTA and therefore, have no experience about the inner workings within the transit agency itself at all, by all means, stay silent, sit back, and relax.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

667,933,380

` ::I think my top 10 would include Satyajit Ray, Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, and Woody Allen as well. More mainstream choices, I think. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

667,933,686

` :::::Never seen it! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

667,934,874

: Sorry for engaging in an edit war and thank you for reminding me of this. I thought that consensus was not reached so was not appropriate for Abierma3 to remove the material. I will try to engage in discussion with Abierma3 to try and sort out the issue.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,940,170

Fartsalot56 says f**k you motherclucker!!

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

667,940,454

== Yeah == User:Smalljim sucks big fat chode!!

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

667,957,186

:You may upload a photo here . More information is available at Wikipedia:Uploading images.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

667,961,174

::: As you might already know, the discussion on the Talk: Race (human classification) page has become heated again, with editors having very different views on what the lead definition should be. I have tried really hard to reach out to another longtime editor but I have not been successful. I'm not claiming that the views of one editor trumps another. But I do want to express my concern that once the protection status of that page has been lifted, there might be potential edit conflicts. I really don't think this is productive and I really believe consensus is important so that any major edit would be lasting. My view on the matter is that at a minimum, there should be an RfC or similar, and that no edits should be done until consensus is reached. Ideally, more editors should be involved in the discussions. I welcome any advice you might have on this matter. Thanks.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

667,966,434

:* Yes absolutely. Thanks a lot. Regards.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

667,969,864

NBC has unleashed the show art for the series, I think the image needs to be updated to include all main cast members, google, Chicago Med Show art, its an image of the group together in the ER

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

667,970,561

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vg6JFoMT-rU/VXsXZVG1yHI/AAAAAAAARI0/uq_ezjbivCE/s1600/NUP_169329_0001%2B%2Bchicago%2Bmed%2Bkey%2Bart%2Biliketowatchtvblogspot.JPG heres the link to the image, which is free, I don't exactly know how to update images.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

667,970,960

Anything posted on the internet is free to use, a description of the show? really? there going to come after wikipedia for giving actual information

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

667,971,551

== QUIT EDITING CHICAGO MED == YOU ARE SO STUPID, HOW CAN SOMEONE POST ON HERE AND GET IT VERFIED WITHOUT YOU CHANGING IT, INFORMATION POSTED ON HERE THATS CITED IS NOT COPYRIGHT. ARE YOU FROM AMERICA U IDIOT GET A LIFE. STOP RUINGING CHICAGO MEDS PAGE

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

667,971,922

` == QUIT EDITING CHICAGO MED == YOU ARE SO STUPID, HOW CAN SOMEONE POST ON HERE AND GET IT VERFIED WITHOUT YOU CHANGING IT, INFORMATION POSTED ON HERE THATS CITED IS NOT COPYRIGHT. ARE YOU FROM AMERICA U IDIOT GET A LIFE. STOP RUINGING CHICAGO MEDS PAGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by `

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

667,987,007

== Nigerian == I have reason to believe you are Nigerian. Yuck.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

668,004,087

I don't give a flying fuck about wiki and I am sure telling you that will get another of your petty bans. My fiancee has maybe another year of life before she is murdered. It may be you are another self-important wiki masturbator or you are part of the conspiracy to have her isolated and murdered. Who gives a fuck what you wankers decide it's only wiki. Now piss off and go edit model railways or whatever else you do you disgusting little creep.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

668,011,966

::: Awright then. Will now be done.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

668,013,914

: No, I got it now. Because I thought the Y indicated a team that could finish 3rd or lower, regardless to whether 3rd place guaranteed a knockout stage qualification or not. You explained nicely where I got it wrong though. Now I see, there is no necessity for any letter.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

668,032,164

` ::::::Thanks Marnette. ) Oh yes, definitely Chaplin! And Doctor, yes, Alexander Payne is marvelous. Among others, I also admire Todd Haynes and David Fincher. Steven Spielberg and James Cameron's vision are worth admiring as well. In India, apart from Ray, Shyam Benegal, Rituparno Ghosh, and Vishal Bhardwaj would feature in my top 10. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

668,033,826

== HEY! == Stop deleting my Looney Tunes VHS/Laserdisc articles! They deserved to be noticed! Copyright or not! Just leave them alone! And if you don't listen to reason, I'll just keep re-adding them!

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

668,048,847

::Concerning your last sentence, what you're describing is not vandalism per WP:VAND. Just because something can be cited does not mean it is appropriate for an article, thus removing it is not vandalism just because it is cited. -

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

668,062,373

the Coen brothers; the last two specifically for the flawless ambiance they create in their films

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

668,065,586

HAVE A NICE DAY !

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

668,128,053

IMDB IS THE ONE WHO CAN WRITE IN NOT LIKE YOU BITCHES WHO NOT CAN TRUST TO, FUCK YOU SOON NO ONE WOULD WRITE ON YOUR FUCKING WIKIPEDIA EVEN IF YOU LICK OUR ASS !!!!!!!!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

668,129,953

== Cancelled == The Disney archive website is actually a very reliable and respected animation site for all the cancelled movies. It's very interesting and it deserves to stay there.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

668,148,941

I'm made of dollar store scrubby pads and cheap rubbing alcohol.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

668,149,041

Right up there with make believe universities, eh? ::

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

668,154,182

Did you quit like you said you would if anyone told you what to do or were you forced out for incompetence with Flow aka liquid threads 3? kiss:

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

668,165,659

Hi Sam! How's wikipedia going?

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

668,187,170

* I would agree with Gerda that an infobox would be appropriate and a benefit to the article. I disagree Opus33...for far too long, various people, especially on classical music articles, have used those tired arguments to thwart useful infoboxes. The claims of redundancy and aesthetics smack of a subjective WP:IDONTLIKEIT resistence.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

668,188,462

`Don't know how concisely stating essential information can be in any way hutful...not like the article has screamed out ``ouch``. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

668,208,719

What a load of bollocks. : So Mr Bernstein is making COI edits? How terrible, you'll be accusing him of using one of Wikipedia's most high traffic pages to spam his own blog next. Oh, wait... ::

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false