rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
668,793,979
|
:::*We have here a quote of a defence minister of a major Nato country as saying that this ″not a new cold war with Russia, as the situation was already “pretty warm”″, i.e. acknowledging that Nato is in a de fcto state of war with RF!
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
668,830,449
|
` == Other formulations == Recently, I did some original research into other formulations of Moore's law (the section at the end of the article) and I discovered about 50 mentions of ``Moore's law of X`` or ``Moore's law for Y.`` My website has a preliminary plot of the data at http://www.tedsanders.com/graphs/moores-law-of-moores-laws/. Do you think this research, once cleaned up and sourced, would be worth mentioning in the 'other formulations' section? Right now the 'other formulations' section is not at all organized or comprehensive - it just seems to be a few examples picked arbitrarily. Thanks for any thoughts. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
668,830,994
|
` This thread is a good reminder of why I don't edit Wikipedia any more. Eric's original post was only mildly provocative by his standards and to be provoked by it someone has to go out of their way and read Eric's talk page. But those who want to be provoked chooses to look, finds an excuse and flounces off to AE. Then the initial posters at AE see that it is flouncing and the consensus is to take no action, but along comes someone who is supposedly one of the most senior supervisors on this project and blocks Eric against consensus. On a serious encyclopaedia, a senior supervisor would have a name prefixed by ``Dr`` or ``Prof`` but here senior professors go by oh so clever puns such as ``Gorilla Warfare``, a name suggestive that its user sees herself as fighting a war against the type of brawny sexist male who gets referred to commonly as a gorilla. In other places, this might be taken to imply that said senior administrator has a point of view that might get in the way of taking an impartial view latest Eric's display of chest-thumping, but on Wikipedia she can do what she wants. Wikipedia isn't about the wisdom of the crowd; it's all about the baying of a mob stirred up by political agitators.`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
668,849,601
|
[User:Bbb23]] you can take your pompous poaturings and berger off.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
668,853,127
|
` ::Haha. Yes, there were reviews in her songs. P So funny how some new editors come in here so much pissiness. Or are you a sock? Likely the latter. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
668,854,286
|
` :Absolutely agree. No relevance to either his on-screen or off-screen persona. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
668,854,926
|
` == libtool == Hi Hibou, if you're still here. Saw your remark on libtool, I believe you are right, it's a useless link. Maybe you could delete it ? I'm not going to because every time I change anything on wikipedia some twelve year old gets their nose out of joint and claims ``Vandalism ! Vandalism ! You made a change I don't like !`` So to heck with them all ... but you are correct, as far as I can find there's no ``drop-in BSD-licensed replacement.`` SOmebody got into the good stuff, I think P `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
668,907,982
|
` :::::::My very best wishes, I fail to see in what you posted above any logic,let alone valid reasons for including the statement. The current situation is hot now in a much more direct and immediate way than ever during the original Cold war: we have regular russian troops fighting right across Russia′s border, under an exceedingly thin cover of deniability, in Ukraine, part of whose territory has been formally annexed, which in turn is hosting the US intelligence and military advisors and personnel. But that is extraneous to the subject of discussion here. As i said above, I am not claiming that Putin′s words on 40 missiles are not ``important``. I say that the exact meaning of those words, without a broader context and expertise info on the subject, is not clear (See my post above), and consequently the quote alone would stick out as a meaningless (or puzzling) throw-in. Then, you said above ``Russian nuclear weapons are actually in a workable state``. May I ask you: Whose opinion is that? And what does it matter? The RF nuclear arsenal has NEVER been used in actual battle and thus its actual battleworthiness (which includes a wide gamut of capabilities, apart from just having warheads and delivery systems that can deliver unhindered in a situation where no one actually hinders) is a matter of assessment and supposition. That said, there is an overwhelming body of experts′ opinion that this arsenal IS formidable and capable of destroying the US both in a putative first strike and in a retaliatory strike, in a guaranteed way, even in a situation where the entire political and military leadership of Russia is destroyed (See Dead Hand (nuclear war)). I hear your point about ``this is all not about real capabilities, but about intentions and decisions that can be completely illogical``. But where do you see any intentions, or illogical decisions in those words by Putin? He does appear to be boasting (by quite possibly lying as is common in such matters), but what is his intent? The most likely intent to be deduced from his words: he is trying to pull the wool over the eyes, and hide the rapid rate of the shrinking of the RF arsenal. But that is a speculation. If you can find an expert′s analysis of these words, then it may well be interesting and notable. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
668,919,165
|
` ::::Can you quote any of the ``endless insults``? Can you do it at WP:ANI? If so, then retract your own insult, and go to ANI. Geez. I'm not going to ask for you to be blocked, but do you think everyone else at WIkipedia likes you as much as I do? `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
668,934,941
|
What amazed me was the number of people suggesting (on Twitter, naturally) that following the SCOTUS ruling, they would be moving to Canada. I have a standing request to CBSA to review all applicants' Twitter accounts prior to admitting them. A great day indeed Dennis.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
668,935,789
|
. I was in College for 4 years
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
668,944,513
|
== You're a troll == I bet you're one happy ass motherfucker now that you unfairly edited a wikipedia page without reason.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
668,951,159
|
== you seem upset == Perhaps a massage can help whatever hurt your butt. TParis can bring the oil and Ironholds will bring a lighter, (for moxibustion). ^)
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
668,951,831
|
== Cassianto == Hi. I received an email from someone asking me to comment on this page about guys called Cassianto and Shro Cat. The email said you're being harassed. Never heard of Shro Cat, but Cassianto was some pitiful, obsequious little cunt who implied that I ought to show respect for someone who writes crappy featured articles. I told Cassianto to FO; I told him not to contact me again. The creep came back once. I ignored it. To be frank, you need to learn how to deal with this. Forums and online communities are full of creeps, social inadequates, born losers, stalkers and mentally unstable zeros. Tell them to FO and ignore them. Respectfully, I don't want any further emails (or comments on my talk page) about this. I'm really not interested. Ignore this piece of shit Cassianto and it'll leave you alone.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
668,951,921
|
` Note: After this unblock, I took notice that the user (User:Wikimandia) who so avidly requested me being blocked, after vandalizing my talk page, refusing to engage in constructive AfD discussion and showing innapropiate childish behaviour and false edit summaries in a WP:POVFORK article was blocked for a week . I guess that is what happens to those who engage in WP:HOUNDING and specially WP:NOTTHERE, along with blatantly false accusations of ''POV`` and ``vandalism``. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
668,952,480
|
== == Hey. I asked if the IP is allowed to remove those warnings from their talk page, and he said that they are allowed to do that because the warnings don't fall under the category of anything listed on WP:BLANKING.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
668,954,194
|
:It must be something to do with the citations for each horse, which I had to put in when the In The News discussion was going on. I don't know how to fix it myself.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
668,957,670
|
: Could you please cite the sources which reference this information; it might or might not qualify, I am not sure. Perhaps you or another user can give some further details. Thanks a lot.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
668,962,635
|
REDIRECT Talk:The Remaining Documents of Talaat Pasha
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
668,981,015
|
THERE HASNT BEEN ANY EPISODES SINCE MARCH 7, DUMBASSES!!!
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
668,998,960
|
::: editors like you are what is wrong with Wikipedia. What you are doing is making Wikipedia worse. You are not interested in actual information, or helping people, but in enforcing the rules. It is really disgusting. What is worse is how people who want to make Wikipedia better, such as providing accurate and helpful information are simply argued with and actively discouraged from participating. You say trash the place then leave but what has done is actually provide references. He doesn't have to do anything else. That is what the small-minded over-zealous editors should be doing, namely taking the actual informative content and doing their little grammar and formatting edits. That is all you are good for, so do it, do that work. Stop discouraging people with actual content from participating with the threatening notes. Such a tragedy of the commons.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
669,005,414
|
== A330 Regional == Airbus launched A330 Regional and that's a separate variant not reflect in the article.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,016,959
|
== Do you really want to go through all this again? == What's that...oh you do. Oh OK then...MASSIVE TROLLING AND VANDALISM ON YOUR TALK PAGE IT IS THEN (LOL)
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,038,198
|
Deor Thanks. Can you tell me to insert refereo in pages?? I know little but please can you say some reference tag and other useful tag??
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
669,042,516
|
, was it perhaps random? Gothaparduskerialldrapolatkh
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,048,576
|
== My user page == Why did you patrol my user page? Random perhaps? Gothaparduskerialldrapolatkh
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,049,562
|
== Removing my edits == You are a fucking bastard. There was no reason to remove what I added to the great intelligence and list of Doctor Who villians pages. You stuck up arsehole. Can you understand what this means? I think I've simplified it enough for a dullard like you. I you still struggle to understand, I suggest you return to the yank equivalent of playgroup and restart your education. My additions were relevant. There is no reason not to include things not from the TV, Doctor Who is also a radio series, many novels, play etc. stop editing Doctor Who articles you don't know anything about the show. Thick stuck-up prick.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
669,051,099
|
:you seem upset. There are ointments for that. ^)
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,051,344
|
== Removing my edits without good reason == I would like to know why anyone should bother to edit Wikipedia if a sad bigot like you is going to remove their work, even if it is correct, relevant and with an appropriate reference. Doctor Who is not just on TV, it is also a radio series, many novels, comics etc, all of which are relevant and appreciated by fandom.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
669,051,980
|
== Way out of line? == Out of line? Am I your subordinate? Do I exist only to be controlled by bigots like you? Right-wing prat
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,052,973
|
` :Oh yeah before I forget, any idea how I add my old talk archive link to my talk page? `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,059,688
|
` == discussion of Rule #1, aka bluelinks-only == Hi ObieGrad while I agree with your goals of keeping the article reliable, I think your rules are problematic in the details. First of all, under rule#1 above, you've deleted a bunch of Fiorina endorsements, which were 99% reliably sourced, on the basis of them being ``not notable`` because there is currently no wikipedia article on the endorser (i.e. the person making the endorsement). This not an uncommon article-specific tradition for list-articles, per guideline WP:CSC, but it does violate policy WP:NOTEWORTHY, and in this particular case (lists of presidential party endorsements) I believe in a crucial fashion. Wikipedia should reflect what the sources actually tell us, and not what other articles on wikipedia tell us, right? There are going to be plenty of reliably-sourced endorsements from swing-state and early-caucus-state legislators. Per WP:POLITICIAN guideline, these types of folks are quasi-inherently ``notable`` in the wikipedia sense; even though they might not currently have an article, because they are state legislators, elected in a public campaign, making laws with broad impact as their job, and often trying to get their name in the news, plus as part of their job getting their name in a multitude of government-website sources, they are presumed (under the guideline) to be wiki-notable. Thus, if you look at New_Hampshire_General_Court#External_links you will see that only about 10% of the state reps have a dedicated article, the rest being redlinks, and the vast majority of the bluelinks being stubs, with the exception of Gene Chandler and a couple others. That's not because articles on each NH rep cannot be written, but simply because they haven't been written yet. Example#1, in particular, one of the dozen endorsements you deleted was cited material showing Will Infantine as an endorsee from Fiorina's list, because he does not yet have a wikipedia article. Even a cursory web-search shows that such an article could be written; he made national news in 2014 over comments he made about salary for women versus salary for men, and as a committee-chair in the state legislature he has about a dozen RS in local newspapers for other state-level stuff he has been involved with. There are a few cites on his involvement with presidential-level inside-baseball-politics during 2012 and 2016, where New Hampshire plays an oversized role, see United_States_presidential_primary#Iowa_and_New_Hampshire. Somebody even noted the apparent dichotomy between Infantine's support of Fiorina, the only 2016 wiki-notable republican female potential-candidate besides Sarah Palin (cf Hillary Clinton and Warren plus kinda Gillibrand who are also noted for their gender in RS about the democratic potential-candidates), and his gender-related salary-comments from 2014. So to my way of thinking, if the New York Times and Weekly Standard and Boston Globe and Mitt Romney campaign think that Will Infantine in particular, and NH state reps in general, are WP:NOTEWORTHY ... then bluelinks-only is probably the wrong rule. Example#2, you deleted the redlink to Phyllis M. Katsakiores, with the reliably-cited WMUR source that verified the data, as ``non-notable``. Again, though, the most cursory of googling shows that not only does she have at least as many RS as Infantine does (cf George Katsakiores in local Derry politics and Thomas Katsakiores who is another sitting NH state rep), she has had a wikipedia article since 2011. Example#3, somebody not yet in the article is Iowa pastor Terry Amann, who is unlikely to have a dedicated wikipedia article (not an elected official or otherwise in the news), but who is identified by WP:RS as being a key influencer specifically for the 2016 presidential contest, and made WP:NOTEWORTHY endorsements in the past
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
669,071,068
|
`== This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2015) == {| style=``width:100%; padding:2px;`` ! Hello, WordSeventeen. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Previous selections: • • Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: using on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |} == Today's articles for improvement weekly vote == * Hello WordSeventeen: :This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 28 of 2015. Thanks for participating! Sent by using mass messaging on == This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2015) == {| style=``width:100%; padding:2px;`` ! Hello, WordSeventeen. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Previous selections: • • Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: using on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |} == Today's articles for improvement weekly vote == * Hello WordSeventeen: :This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 29 of 2015. Thanks for participating! Sent by using mass messaging on `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,072,303
|
::::::::You are such an ignorant piece of refuse. You cannot understand what utter crap you actually are. This is not personalization, it is fact. The fact that your tens of thousands of edits don't actually contribute to human knowledge, but detract from it. You are a farce, a peripheral character in a Kafka novel. A negation on the planet. Your simple negation actually negates your very existence. Thank you so much for living up to the current actual potential of Wikipedia as it erodes its actual value.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
669,072,450
|
you should do your research. the doad clan were a part of chandravanshi rajputs of yadu dynasty.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
669,072,479
|
` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Original Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | For craphood extraordinaire. |}`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
669,072,698
|
` == Revert Warrior == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Cutting off your nose to spite your face |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | C - U - Nnnnnnn - Totally! |}`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
669,072,887
|
` == A kitten for you! == Joke, like the joke you are. Wikipedia will burn in hell for your sins. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
669,073,074
|
Go fuck yourself and block me you cunt.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
669,073,309
|
:: Go fuck yourself and block me you cunt.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
669,084,138
|
== Requesting the repeal of my block ==
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,103,383
|
` == Lazenby? == You have photos of all the Eon Bonds except Lazenby. You even have one of David Niven! I'm not too impressed by this ``Gold Star`` article. `
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
669,123,055
|
:::Alright then, Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Deletion Archive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Anime and manga are also exempted.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
669,129,937
|
== Contested deletion == This page should not be speedily deleted because... well known martial artist. Subject of a NY Times obituary is a testament to his fame.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,130,506
|
:Thanks. I added a shorter version using .
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,135,456
|
` June 2015 (UTC) :Answer: The publication list was prepared gradually and it was accepted by the other editors. They even encouraged me to increase the number of journals in this publication list. Then I have gone and spent two weeks to find the remaining parts of their publications, and I added to the list. It was approved by other people. And this movie preparer came and erased all of it. It is obvious who is doing the edit war. You can not delete or erase other pages prepared by other persons without giving any explanation. It was a work of two and three weeks and prepared gradually and it is erased in one second by an person who prepares singer pages and you are defending this kind of people. 03:34, 29`
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,141,326
|
`::When I was placing some important publications in Turkish Wikipedia, many other editors supported and encouraged me to put more and provide the complete list of publications. Some of them even said that the articles were developing in the right direction ask me to make more research to complete the entire set of publications. I spent more than two weeks to find these publications from various other data bases since I know that Wait & Barut were two important scientists in their fields. They have more than 300 journal pubs and I have selected some important ones. When I gradually placed these publications, the editors were happy, they approved the material and ask for more. All of a sudden, the preparer of the singers, football players came out and erased all of them. Hey. What's going on there what's happening? Then this person also erased the material on English-Wiki which was approved by your editors. Now, have you understood the whole story? If you still don't get it I don't need more explanation from you because I got it. You can go and examine the history of Wait & Barut pages in Turkish and English Wikipedia, Then you will see what was going on.. `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
669,145,607
|
` :I've changed ``its Allies`` to ``the other JIT members`` since the former was vague, while the latter gives specificity as to exactly who they're discussing with. The Guardian/AFP article names the 5 JIT members they discussed it with, as does this article by The Borneo Post. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,148,077
|
` **I don't want anything. Just don't delete the previously approved publications. It was approved by the editors in Turkish Wiki and also in English wiki before this person delete all, who calls this ``cleaning up process``. In Turkish wiki, other editors apologized because of his attitude. I will replace back the previously approved publications by MaterialScientist, and I will not attempt to add more anymore to these pages, i.e. I will not put all of their publications which are around 400. `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,161,086
|
Don't attack me, attempt to censor my speech and send me threats. You violated Wikipedia terms of service. If you keep it up you'll be banned.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,161,241
|
This shows contempt for Wikipedia editors. You should be removed as an admin and moderator for your hate speech.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,163,919
|
` ::::I think you're over-reacting. I didn't actually mean you'd been off tnbe Holy Land to fight the infidel. Where else exactly have I ``slandered`` you? I just think yoiur block of chnages were too bold. Apologies, Nikkim for the intrusion. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,165,905
|
the products they supply have never been done before by any other company so how can we write this so it's won't be deleted if it's the truth.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,166,964
|
How come dodge has a page with pics and info to the site, how come ford has one, they are all companies, they have patented inventions talked about, They have good and bad designs, how come when you post a small post on a new company that made advancements that are not only important but historical in the car community it's deleted, if you really want to help why don't you help reword it, cuz the way I see it more then half the pages on here are not following the guide lines
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,167,227
|
Your just a overweight beetch effff youuuu
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
669,172,266
|
22:12, 31 August 2006
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,181,030
|
` ::::: -You can mention whining and abusive behaviour all you like, but I think you know the real reason that you are spending so much time on line, and so little interacting with people offline. You pursued me, and I don't care whether you hide behind a rulebook or not. You have absolutely no understanding of literature, or the arts. Unlike you, I actually work in that area. :::::You are a bully, and have been cutting a destructive swathe across Wikipedia for some while now. It is a pity that this entire website seems to be taken over by idiot savants, anal retentives and Asperger's types, but there you go. Quoting your beloved website: ::::::``The term anal retentive (also anally retentive), commonly abbreviated to anal, is used to describe a person who pays such attention to detail that the obsession becomes an annoyance to others, potentially to the detriment of the anal-retentive person.`` ::::: As for - you're promoted above yourself, and are clearly unfit for your role. Try looking at both sides of a problem. You've screwed up this time, and should quit before you screw up other people's enjoyment of this website even more. I don't really care if I get banned by you at all, since you've got no power over me whatsoever. You need to spend more time off your computer as well and talking to people face to face. Get some fresh air.- `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,181,324
|
You do more damage than the vandals.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,181,669
|
p.s. In the meantime I shall continue to visit and edit this website, using various means to evade stalkers and the various breeds of socially inept.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,187,671
|
== Controversy over Hungarian language higher education == The section Controversy over Hungarian language higher education presents only the Hungarian POV, the Romanian view should also be included to create a balanced text.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
669,188,881
|
:That is clearly not the case, but even if there is, I would just remove that as trivia anyway.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,197,050
|
== Jackson Martinez == Is that (BBC) not a reliable source?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,198,713
|
: Then that's what I am to edit awright?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,198,745
|
::::It is clear that such a section is everything, except neutral. ::::Because of earlier aggressive behavior, Thanatos666 was just demanded in the ANI process by a WP admin not to modify the article until he has found consensus for his ideas on the talk page. There seems to be no learning curve of Thanatos666, harming the article development, making it very complicate for the editors.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,201,905
|
`, it is not even good for a mediocre blog. ::::Basic logic has been twisted here, language is very fuzzy: Like ``arguments [have] shown to be inaccurate`` but it doesn't say which arguments. E.g. ``work harder`` would be proven to be inaccurate (?), because ``Greeks on average spend 8 hours a day at work``. To show the flawed logic: Everybody knows that in a communist country there is 0% unemployment, 100% are working, like 8h days. Does it mean everybody works hard in communist countries? Nobody would say that. If everybody works hard the question would be why there so not sufficient output in the economy. Just flawed. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,213,318
|
:Sorry that you do not like the way that Wikipedia works but what reliable sources say does matter and whether you or I agree with them does not.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
669,226,547
|
== Regarding the DinaAnchal website == Greetings, may I recommend you to create the page in Draft:Dinaanchal first before launching it to articlespace? It'd leave you with more time to work on your page without being immediately subjected to the strict scrutiny that articles get.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
669,229,865
|
REDIRECT Talk:WXw Tag Team Championship
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,241,617
|
:::I've never touched it. The only thing I changed was the IPA.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,258,943
|
== Name == The car's official name was Bentley T and later Bentley T2 therefore the hyphen and word series is unofficial. The word series is not, therefore, a proper noun and should not be given a capital letter.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,259,626
|
` == Seriously? == Is ``he was married to 3 Hispanic women`` seriously your argument for him not being a racist? He talked about white supremacy and not giving power to blacks more than anyone else even back then. Unsquint your eyes and read, it's right there in the book! `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,259,755
|
Your DO know that Hispanics are part of Europeoid race, don't you? Aparently you don't. Damn racist! Your beloved John Wayne
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
669,263,427
|
` – The person who moved it intended to just do it to wrestler (as we see in the history) and has attempted to correct the mistake by copying the content rather than moving the page. I would like to see it properly moved to retain the page history. Alternatively, could also be moved back to Alexander Rusev, which I am fine with since I remember that name from NXT. As we see in John Morrison (wrestler) we do not add ``professional``, isn't necessary. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
669,284,374
|
REDIRECT Talk:Somerset – Bridlewood
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
669,284,481
|
REDIRECT Talk:Downtown West – Kerby
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,284,630
|
REDIRECT Talk:McKnight – Westwinds
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,297,688
|
` :::: I wouldn't care if you removed ``compression of neck``, as it's redundant to chokehold, and ``during physical restraint by police``, as it is probably unnecessary, but I don't think ``prone positioning`` should be removed. And I'm not sure if poor health is needed as it was only a contributing condition rather than a primary cause. I don't see how it could be simplified much more. If I remember right, contributing causes of death are called contributing if the death would likely have occurred even if those causes hadn't be present. Thus it may not be accurate to blend the two categories together under causes of death. It might be best to add a contributing conditions section to the info box if that were to be included. I'd probably just leave it as is though since it is not excessively long. Having the quotes in the info box is probably unusual, but I don't see anything wrong with it and they don't take up significant room and they are useful info to the reader. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,303,137
|
Hello! I am a female dog..
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
669,303,851
|
` June 2015 (UTC) :::We should add the root course for the Greek debt crisis ``joining the Euro without sufficient financial convergence and competitiveness``, shouldn't we? 08:22, 30`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,304,123
|
I will propose a modified lead based on the discussion and the current article status, ok?
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,320,703
|
` == Live updates == Hi, thought it is time to bring this subject up since tournament starts today and there is risk for live updating (against consensus at WP:FOOTY). Does anyone oppose using that was used last season and on other article like 2014 FIFA World Cup? I recently got ``template editor``-rights so I can add it where needed myself without having to go through request process. I am planning on doing this on related articles when that article is ``in progress``, but wanted to open a discussion first to see if anyone has something to say first. Any comments? `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,338,586
|
, 30 June 2015 (UTC) :Honestly I'd remove the section entirely, save for the Graduate part which I'd move to the Spider page. Maybe a quick reference to Octopussy on the GTV's page too. :A well-written section on Alfa Romeos in films would be nice (dealing with their role in poliziotteschi etc.) but as it is this list of appearances simply does not belong here. — 14:29
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
669,359,039
|
== Hello== I made few disruptive edits to Article to make you guys realise that it needs to be protected. Thanks
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
669,363,123
|
You're useless. Read my advice above.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
669,372,073
|
I will add some of these 'biblical battles' in the list
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
669,373,467
|
ronaldo is a fucking bitch
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
669,373,998
|
Mattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitchMattythewhite is a bitch
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
669,374,384
|
` == Fuck you == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | You're drunk son of a bitch |}`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
669,374,788
|
` == Fuck you == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Mother Fucker |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Mother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitchMother fucker of a bitch |}`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
669,381,466
|
== Stop == Plz stop editing
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,388,446
|
== My Recent Unblocking == I'm sorry, I don't know whether this is the right place as I'm fairly new to editing Wikipedia, none-the-less I just wanted to let you know, re: you're comment about my unblocking, I realise and accept that I'm on an extremely short leash. My actions and comments were unacceptable. I would also like briefly to thank you very much for unblocking me, it was greatly appreciated and as per my request, I promise I shall not re-offend. Thanks for your kind consideration,
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,389,505
|
== A Frank Apology == I would like briefly apologise to my disgusting and unwarranted vendetta against you. I deeply regret and am greatly ashamed by my abhorrent actions and comments and I assure you they will never occur in any form. Again, I am sorry and apologise for all the offence and disruption which ensued my actions. To ensure this does not re-occur, I promise to avoid this talk in future and that you shall never hear from me again. Sorry,
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,394,177
|
:: Hi, I think it can be East Azerbaijan Governance Palace which is the official name used since Pahlavi era (maybe since 1940s). It had other names before that: Ali Qapu and Shams-ol-Emare.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
669,405,595
|
== A question concerning your edit to my user-page == I'm afraid, despite my reading the article you kindly appended to your explanation of your edit to my user-page, I am still none-the-wiser as to why you chose to remove the image (Gallifrey Sound of Drums.jpg). I am sure you had every reason to do so, however, I would still like an explanation as to why you removed said image. On another note, I do feel my privacy is impinged by your edit. I recognise you are an administrator, however, I feel unhappy that, by virtue of your status, you feel you have the right to edit my PERSONAL user-page. I noticed your user-page is locked, so you would like feel as breeched if it were the other way round. As you deleted my image moments after I posted it, I perceive you have my PERSONAL user-page on your watchlist (sorry if this is a mistaken deduction). I do not wish to seem inimical to you, but, even though I have been recently blocked, I feel it rude and an impeachment of my freedom and privacy as a wiki user. If the block is the reason for your placing my user-page on your watchlist, I assure you I am reformed, have no intent on re-offending and have issued a full and sincere apology to the user whom I offended. I harbour no hard feelings towords you and hope you harbour none towards me as I mean no offence. Thank you for your consideration and time,
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,407,862
|
== Resolving doubts about my veracity == Have recently been on the talk page of RedRose64 regarding a matter unrelated to this, I notice you have suspicions about me, naturally. I should like to allay them, for mutual benefit. This is my only ever user, it's not a diversion for previous edits (I think there is a name for people like this, however I am unfortunately unable to re-collect it), however, I had been editing Wikipedia for a while previously without an account, under various i.p. addresses (I shall not disclose them, primarily for reasons of privacy, but also as there are very many) which might account for the seeming experience you observe in my edits. It may also be partly because I tend to copy and paste necessary code from pages where something similar to my aim exists already and editing the text where appropriate. Unfortunately, I am unable to explain why my user-page is unusual as I do not see it as such. I think I can explain if you want if you tell me what set the alarm-bells ringing. Briefly, regarding your just blocking of me, I am reformed and shall never repeat offend. I have apologised to the offended user and would like to apologise to you for any disruption or inconvenience. Thank you for you time and kind consideration. Not to seem sycophantic, but I do genuinely admire your devotion to maintaining Wikipedia and would like to commend you for it.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,410,085
|
: Surprise, surprise. Wikipedia and its administrators.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
669,444,942
|
:::: Voat has been explicitly identified by the enforcing administrator as within the scope of the topic ban, which the above editor knows well. Please be patient while I search for the diff.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,447,315
|
` ::::: While I haven't found the diff I'd hoped, this request by an editor under the same topic ban for permission to edit the Voat article among others has so far been denied. I do find it amusing the editor above, an admitted SPA in the Gamergate topic area, edits Voat while claiming it's unrelated to Gamergate. The connection's clearly identified on this well-curated ``Timeline of Gamergate`` page; quoting ``June 11: Reddit competitor/clone Voat begins to buckle under the increased server strain as a result of the exodus from Reddit, with the new user base trying to rally for Bitcoin payment to help. Voat is now favored by Gamergaters, , and neo-Nazis for some reason.`` `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,447,422
|
== Topic Ban Violations == You've edited three articles or talk pages in violation of your topic ban: Voat, Ellen_Pao and Social justice. In all three instances you edit-warred to retain your topic ban violations with 6 reverts in the case of Talk:Ellen Pao. I strongly advise you to respect the to avoid further sanction.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
669,463,927
|
I'm sorry sir for abusing and breaching the site rules, I thought those who were undoing my edits were not admins so I kept reverting them, I will not repeat this mistake ever again in the future and I will learn more about how Wikipedia works. So may I be unblocked and get a second and last chance?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.