rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
676,510,485
|
Era changing Please read WP:ERA - there is no need to change, both are acceptable on Wikipedia.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,536,989
|
The Soviet attack was very poorly coordinated and failed to advance rapidly. Therefore the Soviets took unusually heavy tank loses from German field artillery and towed antitank guns.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,538,030
|
`:::::::::: So what's in the running? ``Surface RT``, ``Surface (first generation), and first generation Surface? `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,538,198
|
:::Igorp lj, will you please stop belly-aching about this already. Read the relevant policies and guidelines. You can't cite a blog or an opinion column as a source of fact. You just can't. If you want to attribute an opinion to its author, go ahead. — /
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
676,575,771
|
Brad,, I expect you to identify the source of those alleged copyright violations or undo your edit right away. You know damn well those are not quotes. — /
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,575,939
|
they're scare quotes
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,580,113
|
::No, asshole. You copied and pasted text from a newspaper's website into a Wikipedia article. I reverted the addition of scare quotes to an article. I undid your WP:COPYVIO at an article I've been editing since 2011. You followed me to an article you've never edited before. If you're too fucking stupid to understand the difference, maybe you're too stupid to be editing Wikipedia. — /
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
676,580,288
|
::You moron—I did no such thing. I reverted the addition of scare quotes to the article. And I'm about to do it again. — /
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
676,585,649
|
` ::Simply stating ``a religious grouping in Ulster`` is less contentious and debatable. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
676,600,665
|
Editing Regulatory Sign Hello, I'm JakeZX, and want to let you know that you have to stop your disruptive editing to this article. While we appreciate enthusiasm, you should not blank sections, and and add material that is not Cited. Please try to make useful edits to Wikipedia in the future.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
676,605,877
|
Oh, but I see you've been blocked for other shit. That's a lot of shit.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
676,607,056
|
::Admins stick together. Never talk back. I get it. Lots of shit.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
676,607,432
|
` :I'm afraid I don't see you addressed the problems I mentioned. Where are any independent, reliable sources that discuss the topic, namely and specifically your series? Has it been aired yet? If not, please see Wikipedia:Too soon. If it has been aired on a channel with nationwide or international viewership, I imagine that some newspaper or media guide has discussed it (PR releases don't count). I hope that helps. / `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
676,607,907
|
::::In that case, I'll revert to the comments I made before I noticed he was blocked.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,608,042
|
Discography is better. ::Not that you would pull WP:Involved shit. Oh, but I see you've been blocked for other shit. That's a lot of shit.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
676,615,938
|
== About recent matter == Hello Fnlayson. Could You just please make a reply to my comments at the talk-side of the F-15 article. No hard feelings, I'm probably just too slow minded to understand Your undue comment when You reverted my contribution. Cheers !
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,624,566
|
` == Article needs overhaul == == This pages need serious considerations of revisal. == An ethnic group means sharing a large element of genetic relation amongst its members. Afghans (Tajiks included) are closer related to Northwest South Asian populations GENETICALLY, than to Iranian populations. http://www.zackvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/genome_Zack_Full.txt.cleaned_BGA_4.png Iranians, on the other hand, genetically cluster with South Caucasians, Anatolians, and Mesopotamians. The only relation Tajiks have with Persian Iranians is a shared language and somewhat-shared literary culture. Other than that, the genetics prove that they are not closely related groups. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == This pages need serious considerations of revisal. == i agree, this article need serious consideration as soon as possible for revisal the article is totally misleading. tajiks and afghans should have their own article and like other nations, persians (or iranians) should have an article of their own. perisan is only an ancient name for iranians. please consider correcting the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • Exactly, this really is extremely misleading. There already is a ``Persian language`` page- the ethnicities are distinct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by • == request of an administrator == Please revert this article, this article is full of errors. iranians and afghans are two different nationalities and ethnicities. they can not be mixed according to wikipedia rules and according to the fact that persian (iranians) and afghans are not the same thing and can not be in the same category. thank you == Second Paragraph Should Be Deleted == ``Afghanis, better known as Afghoonis or Efis and Afaghaneh, are not part of the Persian people and they are acting as wannabe persians, they are not proud of their nation and we Iranians hate them hate them hate them.`` This should be taken out of the article, for obvious reasons/ == afghoonis are not Persians == afghanis are not persians, austrians speak german but are not germans and they do not consider themselves as germans, they are neither considered germans by the people of germany, the people of switzerland speak french but they are only swiss and it is wrong to call the swiss peoiple as french people. the people of belgium speak dutch, but they are not dutch or netherlanders, the people of brazil speak portuguese but they are not portuguese people. they are brazilians speaking portuguese. the people of ghana speak english but they are not english. and finally the afghans speak a dialect of persian. but they are not persians racially or ethnically or historically. afghans are ethnically and racially a mixed nation. the tajiks, are related to people of central asia, to the people of uzbekistan, turkmenistan and tajikistan. the tajiks of afghanistan look exactly the same as tajik and uzbeks because they are the same. the hazaras are not related to the iranian or persian race, they are of mongol origin, their hazaragi language which is a dialect of dari language, is heavily mixed with the momgolian languiage, their look and appearence attest to the fact that they are only assimilated mongols. even the word hazara is a millitary unit which describe that they were a part of the mongol chengiz khan army who destroyed civilization of iran including nishabur and tus and many other cities of khorasan. (khorasan is in iran and is iranian, not afghani or afghanistan). tajiks are iranized or persianized central asians, like uzbeks are turkified central asian people. tajik is NOT a synonym of persian or iranian, tajik only refered to people of central asia which became iranized,
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,624,840
|
good luck with your struggle in wikipedia by forcing your bullshit on iranian articles to make afghanis part of the persian and iranian nation. about your delete that azeris and kurds are not iranians and your deleted it, no problem. but afghanis are iranians and persians ( if the iranians (persians) accept you. i dont know why afghans are obsessed by iran.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
676,624,925
|
thank you for editing iranian articles. you are our slave. slave of iranians.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
676,625,320
|
I M P O R T A N T - M E S S A G E . TO . A . WIKIPEDIA ADMINISTRATOR WHY EVERY NATION AND PEOPLE, EVEN STATELESS PEOPLES LIKE ASSYRIANS AND GYPSIES HAVE ARTICLE ON WIKIPEDIA BUT IRANIANS DONT HAVE. THERE IS AN ARTICLE ABOUT IRANIC PEOPLES WHICH IS A LINGUSTIC ARTICLE BUT THERE IS NOT ARTICLE IN WIKIPEDIA ABOUT THE IRANIAN PEOPLE. IF PERSIAN PEOIPLE IS THE ARTICLE OF IRANIAN PEOPLE WHY AFGHANIS ARE STATES AS PART OF IT. AFGHANS STOP EDITIING ARTICLES FOR US IRANIANS. PLS WIKIPEDIA ADMINS UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN. IRANIAN PEOPLE IS THE ONLY NATION THAT DOES NOT HAVE ANY ARTICLE IN WIKIPEDIA. THE ARTICLE OF PERSIAN PEOPLE IS (TOTALLY MISLEADING AND B U L L S H I T EDITED BY IDIOT AFGHANS.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
676,656,994
|
*All that was there was \bguru\b which I think hits anything where guru is neither preceded nor followed by any alphanumeric character. I think you want \b\.guru\b but I am not confident enough in regexen to be sure I'm right.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,679,394
|
I may know why some of my additions were removed, but the addition concerning the Second book of Enoch, what was the matter with it? Were you to willfully brain dead to read it? Is it that you only use your brain for parties and sports, and not intellectual pursuits? One other time I gave article data and gave references, like a police report, but that wasn't good enough, or acceptable for you people. Now I guess the Second book of Enoch is not good enough. What would it take to be acceptable for you narrow minded, willfully, limited brain people to allow it to be used? Did you even graduate high school without bribes? I believe that if God, Himself, stood before you and gave documented data you would not accept it. Why don't you and your family go to Iran where your kind is and leave America alone?
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
676,694,463
|
== Horribly written, not like an encyclopedic article == What is this drivel? :That Hüttenbrenner neither had the work performed, nor even let the society know he had the manuscript is curious and has spawned various theories. Was he given an incomplete score by Schubert and was waiting for the rest before saying anything? If so, he waited in vain throughout the six remaining years of Schubert's life. After Schubert's premature death in 1828 (of typhus as a complication of syphilis), why didn't Hüttenbrenner then make the existence of the manuscript known? Do the torn pages suggest he had somehow damaged the piece and managed to lose, or even inadvertently destroy, the last two movements?[5] Was guilt therefore the reason he kept silent about the work's existence for 37 years after Schubert died? Could personality factors like introvertedness or jealousy have been at play here?
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
676,731,842
|
At first, I thought making edits such as that would be of a humorous nature, but I was mistaken. If I was unblocked, I promise to make constructive edits through a fresh start in which I could positively contribute (the original purpose of which I joined). I am sorry, and I swear on my life that I will not do such things again. Sincerely
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,735,725
|
` == Implementation of Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements == You are receiving this message because you are listed at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Former bureaucrats. Writ Keeper pointed out that these users were not directly notified of the community discussion ending August 2015, where consensus was reached to remove the bureaucrat permissions of users who have not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years. As of 1 October 2015, any former bureaucrat who has not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years that wishes their bureaucrat permissions restored will need to request reinstatement at RFB. If you intend to return to bureaucrat activity, please request restoration of permissions before 1 October 2015 or three years passes since your last bureaucrat activity, whichever is later. To assist with the implementation of this requirement, please see Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity. Modeled after Wikipedia:Inactive administrators and similar to that process, the log page will be created on 1 September 2015. Bureaucrats who have not met the activity requirements as of that date will be notified by email (where possible) and on their talk page to advise of the pending removal. If the notified user does not return to bureaucrat activity and the permissions are removed, they will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFB. Removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon the affected user in any way. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. – `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
676,752,122
|
== Nephilim deleted edit == You state reliable sources. The first part of my edit is that which is taught in college (you would know if you ever attended). It is taught in literature class. It is: When studying this passage, or any passage of the Bible, it is best to use the Exegetical method, which is tearing it down to the bottom and rebuilding it using 6 contexts. First, one must use the Bible to interpret the Bible. Second, using the 6 contexts, which are: 1. What is the context (main idea, or thought) of the Bible?, 2. What is the context of the book you are reading (Genesis, Exodus, etc.)?, 3. What is the context of the chapter you are reading?, 4. What is the context of the verse you are reading? 5. What is the context of the key words?, and 6. What is the historical context? How did the people of that time think, act, etc. An example, to name something is to place one's authority on it. A king of a city state that has conquered another city state gives it a new name, because he is place his authority on it. Two things to keep in mind for a sound, correct interpretation of this passage are: 1. Where is the beginning of the narrative; the pivotal spot? It is Genesis 3:15, which is a prophecy of Christ and the beginning of the battle between evil and good. It is followed by the first example the story of Cain and Abel., 2. In the original Bible there were no chapter or verses, these were added later to make it easier to find passages. The story of the Flood begins at Genesis 4:17 and goes to Genesis 9:7 (this story should have been 1 chapter). This aids the scholar attempting to understand and interpret a difficult passage. The next part: Wilson's Old Testament Word Studies, William Wilson (MacDonald Publishing Co. ISBN 0-917006-27-5, New Wilson's Old Testament Word Studies, William Wilson; Kregel Publications 1987, ISBN 0-8254-4030-0/ both page 185)renders the word nephilim meaning as to fall upon other in rapine violence and apostates fallen from true religion. Strong's Exhaustive Concordance Of The Bible Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary, James Strong (MacDonald Publishing Co. ISBN 0-917006-01-1) cites the word as a bully,tyrant, or dictator. Here is given references to where the data is gotten (even page numbers), but by what you say this is reliable or acceptable. Just what would be. The next part: One can get copies of the First and Second Book of Enoch, which one can read. Two such books are The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, Vol 1(Doubleday & Co. Inc., 1983 ISBN 0-385-09630-5)and The Other Bible(Harper & Row, Publishers ISBN 0-06-250031-7)and there others. A WARNING. When reading these books keep in mind that they are non-canonical and are considered fictional; not God inspired and truthful. When one reads the Book of Enoch one sees a measurement for the offspring as 300 cubits. A cubit is 18 inches (check any Bible dictionary), or 1 1/2 feet. As such the offspring is 450 feet tall. This again shows where one can find the data. All these references are from PUBLISHED and ES LISHED books, that is accepted by college professors, but not by you. How did the article get on Wikipedia? Did the author bribe someone, or is it that they are a dear buddy? You may think this harsh, and it may be, but it is deserved. The reason why the information has been verified with published authentic sources that you refuse to accept. Then what needs to take place is that the articles references must be rejected as well for they are based on the same method and material. Why accept one person's references and not an others when both are from published established sources available to the public. Once before I attempted this folly on an other article and again nothing, not even a police report, was accepted. The only thing I can think for this is that Wikipedia employees are not getting their palm greased, or that I am not a dear buddy with an in. The reliable verified referenced attainable data is beneficial and helpful to the reader and scholar, but you and Wikipedia don't care, and spit on me, my effort to help, and the ones who would have benefited from it. Now you cam laugh and do a dance for you wasted my time and you have robbed the reader.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,759,143
|
` ::::::if that is an ethnic slur, i am the easter bunny. ::::::what is problematic is the gratuitous effort to completely erase a well documented involvement of one language removed from the discussion because at best some people claim it was ``only a part``. complete hogswaggle! THAT is inappropriate ethnic warrior. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,762,115
|
==Eric Brown-Bey== Please don't delete Eric Brown-Bey, I think he should have wikipedia page.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
676,763,338
|
}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2015
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,771,118
|
DON'T TRY TO DELETE ERIC BROWN-BEY ANYMORE
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,773,189
|
HE SHOULD HAVE A PAGE
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,784,279
|
:: There's history with me and the other editor that goes way beyond Wikipedia, which is why I can't take him at his word. But nonetheless I went too far and got spanked, which I probably had coming. Lesson learned I'll put my money where my mouth is....If I ever do it again, you can give me a lifetime ban...finito, see ya bye. I'm willing to stick my neck out if you're willing me work with me.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,785,353
|
:::Cyphoid did what he had to do...no hard feelings there. I was just letting off steam more than anything else, and I am a sucker for letting him bait me. As I said, I'll take a zero tolerance, one more strike and I'm out ban in exchange for lenience here to show I'm not a monster...just a guy who had his buttons pushed and paid the price.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
676,785,434
|
Poop sandwich eaten, lesson learned.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,788,037
|
` :: Let's make one thing clear. I never agreed to anything with you. All I did was back off because as I said before, when a 6-year old keeps screaming for a cookie, sometimes you just give them a cookie to shut them up. None of the changes I made violates any Wiki policy, and you're the only one to ever dispute any of those changes I made, which tells me you were just looking to pick fights more than trying to be a defender of all things Wiki. And while I was in the wrong for going overboard with threats, make no mistake...I don't like you, and will never like you. There is no consensus between us, because your idea of consensus is brow beating me until I give up. And give me one good reason why I should let the SPI go...you did me wrong...why should I allow people to do me wrong without some sort of repercussion? You seem to want a one sided relationship with me on Wikipedia...give you everything while I get the finger - doesn't work that way. You want me to drop the SPI, you drop the Gomer Pyle ``Citizen's Arrest`` act every time I make an edit. As I said, the only one to ever take issue with those edits on those pages is you, which is why I honestly believe you just look to pick fights. Just as an experiment, leave those pages the way I have them for the rest of the month...if someone else has an issue with them, then I'll change it. If not, than I'll know it was just you looking to pick a fight. Satisfy my curiosity, and I'll never bring up the SPI again, because I just need to know if I was wrong in making those edits, or were you just trying to push my buttons. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,789,812
|
:::: I'll be more than willing to move on if you allow me to see if my experiment has any merit to it. I need to know if my edits were in violation of anything (which they aren't) or if you were just trying to pick a fight, and the only way to know is if unbiased eyes say anything. If they don't than I'll know it was just you with a bug up you backside, if so, then we'll go from there.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,790,288
|
== Synthesis == How is the synthesis related to Rhodamine B? The molecular structure is different.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,791,309
|
` Please read through the sources before commenting on it. There has been no copy-paste job, but a quote has indeed been added from a second source. Read the sources. May god give more knowledge to all of us. This is the source added into the article. It concludes with this: ``Their attack on ``the masculine voice of rights, autonomy and abstraction`` bodes ill for a liberal society... Their effort to abolish male privilege while preserving and expanding female privilege is likely to create the very backlash feminists fear. Moreover, most women do not want their brothers,husbands, or sons to live under a legal system that presumes them guilty; nor do they believe that sex is rape, freedom is a male plot, and an abused woman can be her own judge, jury, and executioner.`` Unless anyone can come up with a formula that converts above statement into 'Feminism calls for equality', I suggest refrain from adding that statement without proper source. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
676,791,554
|
:For the record, I have left the article as it is in the hands of the cabal who are keen on reverting even the above statement - apparently rest of the world can't have knowledge if it doesn't suit latest White American fad.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,834,893
|
August 2015 (UTC) :The court ruled that there was no credible evidence whatsoever of Dewani's involvement and he was exonerated. BabbaQ, the judgement is very transparent and explains the judge's reasoning including her findings that Tongo, Mbolombo and Qwabe were all caught red handed fabricating evidence to incriminate Mr Dewani. This is all spelled out in the judgement document - http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2014/188.html 10:34, 19
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,915,258
|
` :::Whoops, I mentally replied to this but didn't actually type it in ). I agree with you , the point of us being here is to improve the encyclopedia and there's no reason why you must' not reply on a so-called ``closed`` PR. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
676,942,205
|
The subject of this article is a living person. A decision to alter ones own gender is DEEPLY personal and I chlallenge you to demonstrate otherwise..
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
676,947,299
|
== Learning to Fuck off. == Hello, welcome to my page. You can fuck off now.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
676,947,379
|
== Continuing to learn to fuck off. == Continuing to tell me to stop changing my page will result in me changing the page back to how I put it. As it is my page, fuck off.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
676,948,180
|
` WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!fag0tWHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!I am weak in life but STRONG on wikipedia I am admin!WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!I AM BBB. I AM F@GGOT!! Hear me rawr!HAND.fag0tWHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!I AM BBB. I AM F@GGOT!! Hear me rawr! WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!fag0tWHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!moronWHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!fag0tjiggabooWHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!I AM BBB. I AM F@GGOT!! Hear me rawr!I am weak in life but STRONG on wikipedia I am admi!WHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!I AM BBB. I AM F@GGOT!! Hear me rawr!fag0tkikeNlGGERWHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US!fag0tI AM BBB. I AM F@GGOT!! Hear me rawr!jewfag0tWHY ARE YOU F@GGOT BBB? TELL US BBB PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE F@GGOT, PLEASE BBB! TELL US! `
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,948,371
|
If I stop I will not be blocked? Do you mean that - will you give me your word?
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,957,231
|
Especially Soap, Soap is a right cunt.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
676,957,468
|
` == Women's chess categories == Some chess editors are discussing the new categories on the chess project talk page. I invite you to participate in the discussion to let us know what you think. Some editors have questioned whether the chess player categories should be divided by gender, and there is also a concern that ``women's chess`` is not the best wording to use. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
676,957,561
|
You can't kill the party Soap, YOU CAN'T KILL THE PARTY!
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
676,957,616
|
== Things Soap learned today == 1. He is a right cunt 2. He cannot kill the party 3. No matter how hard he tries he still has to sit when he pees.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
676,993,241
|
This section needs copyediting but needs to remain because of the importance of the EFF involvement and the fact that Landmark left France subsequent to it's airing.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,039,001
|
Erased another silly message.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
677,039,456
|
Contested deletion This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... This airport is important for Wikipedia, and I think it's a good idea don't delate the page Lucca Tassignano Airport because it will be an important public airport
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
677,057,262
|
Page wikt:venting in Wiktionary has existed since 19:39, 30 June 2007.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,063,905
|
` == 'I COME FROM A MUSLIM FAMILY FROM BOSNIA, BUT BY ETHNICITY I AM A SERB. I BELONG TO SERBIAN LITERATURE' - Mehmed ``Mesa`` Selimovic == This is a response to VolunteerMarek's ``here we go again`` post. Mehmed declared himself to be a Serb, a writer of the Serbian language, and a member of Serbian literature specifically because he knew that people would try to play him off as a member of the invented ethnicities (Bosniak, Muslim by nationality, Montenegrin, Bosnian) that Tito was pushing for to further break apart and split up the Serbs. Mehmed wrote in Serbian, and he explicitly stated so! Here is a letter he wrote to the SERBIAN academy of Sciences and Arts that he recorded in his book ``Sećanja``: ``Potičem iz muslimanske porodice iz Bosne, a po nacionalnoj pripadnosti sam Srbin. Pripadam srpskoj literaturi`` -> TRANSLATION: I COME FROM A MUSLIM FAMILY FROM BOSNIA, BUT BY ETHNICITY I AM A SERB. I BELONG TO SERBIAN LITERATURE Selimovic was a Serb writer who was born into a Muslim family in Bosnia, and, like most Muslim intellectuals and writers living in Bosnia at the time (other examples beside Mehmed: Hasan Kikic, Skender Kulenovic, Camil Sijadic, etc.), realized that all ``Muslims by nationality`` are Serbs who were forced to convert to Islam by Turkish occupiers who stole their sons through a process known as Devshirme and impaled resistors to Islam. To write him off as anything other than a Serbian writer of Serbian literature in the Serbian language of Serb blood would be incredibly ignorant, and done (most likely) by people with an Anti-Serb agenda. Selimovic's Serb Ethnicity was a key point mentioned in the trial of Slobodan Milosevic in the International Court of Justice in the Hague. Volunteer Marek, I don't give a shit about your notice, posting a notice does not allow you to rewrite history. Also his ethnicity and language he writes in is very important because he is a writer and his works deal with ethnic questions in the Balkans.`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,065,032
|
ethnic affiliation is directly relevant for his notability as a writer because his works deal with ethnic questions in the Balkans'''
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,075,224
|
` == A kitten for you! == lolz `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
677,075,768
|
` == A kitten for you! == lolz == A kitten for you! == lolz `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,077,272
|
it in any way that is appropriate
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,108,268
|
== Origin History of SIf as Yahoo group in 2005 == Dear Editors , Found a article about the Origin History SIF origin in 2005 of SIF as Yahoogorup in 2005 . If possible add the link as support link in History.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
677,116,454
|
form of correspondence)
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
677,117,584
|
== TropicalKitty == TropicalKitty is the gobbler of knobs.
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
677,117,685
|
AND YOU ARE VANDALIZING MAH PAGE
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,135,511
|
::I've just seen this discussion, but I do share the disappointment in the way most of my colleagues (and many (most?) of those commenting) are treating the civility policy as entirely optional for someone who is provoked. If you (or anyone else reading this) have ideas how to improve things in this regard please share them. Asking strong questions at the next arb election would not be inappropriate as one example.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
677,137,736
|
==Rachel Dolezal== There are numerous RS that draw a comparison between Rachel Dolezal and the subject of this article. Several editors feel strongly that mentioning this comparison in this article is inflammatory and against wp:BLP. I thought I would post at least one RS and let other editors determine to what extent this material should be in this article. *Aaron Morrison “Is Shaun King White? Black Lives Matter Activist, Writer Responds To Conservatives' Claims He Is Another ‘Rachel Dolezal’”, International Business Times, 19 August 2015
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
677,158,082
|
` Thank you for getting to me and sorry for the late response. The AfD has simply not received enough discussion to delete it immediately. Running it for another week or two for the sake of more !votes from other editors makes no harm. If you think I've erred, you can contact the admin . Regards—☮ `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
677,166,635
|
` :No, I said the information, was poorly placed, poorly written, and improperly sourced. Dbachmann is more than welcome to read the ``discussion`` on my talk page. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,196,178
|
== No Such User's Opinion == :Not sure if you're able to comprehend, but here are few facts to consider :#Serbia was not a country during Selimović's life. Neither was Bosnia and Herzegovina. Yugoslavia was. :#He was a partisan and a communist, and has fought for Yugoslav union in WW2 and thereafter :#Selimović's declaration letter came in 1976, when he was 66, and it came as a result of conflicts and harrasment he had in Sarajevo :#Serbian language is just a standardized variety of Serbo-Croatian, which is a linguistic unit. :#Statements on trial of Slobodan Milošević are not a relevant, reliable source for wikipedia. Biographies by relevant, nuanced biographers, such as Hayden or Crnković are. :Do you really think you're the first editor who came here to demand that we coy to requests for his uniquely Serbian / Bosniak nationality (cross the unnecessary) spoken in angry rants? The archives are full just of that nationalist crap. More sane and neutral editors, where I unhumbly count myself, reached a tacit agreement to go for outside sources, downplay his ethnicity crap, and tell the bullies like yourself to fuck off.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,201,962
|
` == Reply to No Such User's Opinion == :Not sure if you're able to comprehend, but here are few facts to consider :#Serbia was a country during Selimović's life for 19 years before Yugoslavia was (1910-1918 Kingdom of Serbia, 1918-1929 Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, 1929 SCS was renamed Yugoslavia)., And it was also one of the Federal Republics of Yugoslavia. This is why on the Yugoslav censuses, ``Serb ethnicity`` was an option, which Selimovic selected. :#The majority of the members of the Partizans and the Communists were Serbs, being a Serb and being a partizan/communist was not mutually exclusive :#Your implication that he changed nationalities from Bosnian to Serbian to spite Sarajevan ``harrasment`` is ridiculous because he was not addressing his nationality in the letter, but rather his ethnicity, which is an unchangeable characteristic. :#The Serbian language's standardization was devised by Karadzic in 1818, 17 years before the Croatian latin alphabet was standardized by Ljudevit Gaj, and 32 years before Serbo-Croatian was devised at the Vienna agreement. If you read Mesa Selimovic's books you would know that the modern standardized Serbian language is older than both modern standardized Croatian and Serbocroatian as he wrote a book discussing Karadzic's reforms. Also there are Croatian and Serbo-Croatian dialects that are not mutually understandable with the modern standardized Serbian that Selimovic wrote in, namely Cakavian and Kajkavian. :#You say Biographies are reliable sources. Then read this excerpt from Selimovic's own autobiography ``Sjecanja`` that he wrote himself and you will find the following quotation: ``Potičem iz muslimanske porodice iz Bosne, a po nacionalnoj pripadnosti sam Srbin. Pripadam srpskoj literaturi`` -> TRANSLATION: I COME FROM A MUSLIM FAMILY FROM BOSNIA, BUT BY ETHNICITY I AM A SERB. I BELONG TO SERBIAN LITERATURE :You are clearly not a ``sane and neutral editor`` if you call me a bully and tell me to fuck off simply for adding relevant (the author's works deal primarily with ethnic questions in the Balkans) additional information and citations from the author's own autobiography to an article.`
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,207,253
|
(A city in which one third of the population was Serb)
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
677,216,156
|
` :Whoa! The ``Got it`` comment is too much. Why the need to bite those who disagree with you. Please do not be rude. The facts are the facts. When she was at Lucent, she created 22,000 jobs. That's a fact and it needs to stay. While she was at Lucent she grew revenue and she grew net income. These are facts. Now you have cited one (1) source that admits that these facts are true. Other reliable sources support these facts. They can't be removed because they might fit into whatever story you want the article to tell. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,222,159
|
` == ``Muslim Serb is an Anachronism`` == Muslim Serb is not an Anachronism. Serbia is a secular country, and the nationality of a Serb is not denied if he is Muslim. Serbs have been forced to convert to Catholicism and Islam by foreign occupiers for centuries, namely German, Austrian, Hungarian, Italian, Papal, French, and Ottoman Turkish ones for centuries.`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
677,223,421
|
` Nice man, talking to yourself, very convincing. It's interesting how you've decided to launch an entire ``saga`` against me simply to censor a citation from Selimovic's autobiography that is relevant to his article.`
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
677,243,037
|
:::FRINGE. not minority. we don't cite every expert spouting about things outside of their field.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
677,245,468
|
|Stt13]] 10:27, 22 August 2015
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,264,412
|
== Congrats == Congrats that the wikidouchebags final had the good sense to name the entry after the actual name of the country. Bout time morons.
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
677,268,168
|
` :This article is not about a living person. It is about a man who has been dead for some time. Is it acceptable for an article about someone who is long dead to mention that some people have accused him of being anti-semitic? Yes, it is. It would be impossible to write proper articles about several significant historical figures if it were otherwise. Like I said, ``speak no ill of Joseph Campbell`` is not the rule here. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,269,954
|
==Do not ever message me== I have thousands of VPN alias and will make your life hell. I made the last editor quit, now learn your lesson!
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,270,057
|
Oh, I dream of naughty things....
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,271,060
|
` :All edits are preserved - take yours from article history (click ``history`` on top), reference it and save. We can not know what you do in real life, we look at the content you add. `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,314,607
|
::: That is what templates are for - not other meaningles articles.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,326,172
|
DETAILed article and 27 fotos discussing careful measurements and correlation with modern constellation software walked back in time to the time of the cave drawings to prove the use of the cave paintings e.g. at time of summer solstice as the sun light walks across the images essentially telling a story: work by chantal jogues-wolkiewiez see http://www.astronomy2009.org/ :::: what is jmissing is here in these caves and 7,000 years later at gobekli tepi is the careful depiction of a fully developed what some would argue religion , but in fact, it includes religion but is a depiction of the engine of creation ... ard ri sr lil AO
| 2,015
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,355,734
|
: Thanks. I fixed that.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
677,389,704
|
==Page move== Hi, I just 5x expanded Bais Rivka for a DYK nomination. The page should be titled Beth Rivkah, which is the official name of the institution and the name that appears in most media reports. I posted a note for consensus on the talk page, and even the editor who moved the page to its present name agreed that it should be moved back. Would you kindly make the move? Thanks,
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,390,579
|
==Quality== Assessed to start class. Has good bones, but would benefit from more expansion.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
677,410,865
|
:Use one that doesn't round numbers up then, asshole.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
677,412,223
|
::I had to fix all that sh%t manually. Do you know how long the common minke page is gonna take you piece of sh%t? What the f%$k is your problem?? Use a converter that doesn't f$%k up conversions or go the f%&k; home you stupid c$nt.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
677,412,321
|
:::And what was with that 1984 sh#t? That's new.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
677,413,448
|
Text Edit Fuck. Shit. Cunt.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
677,413,554
|
::::Bitch. Cunt. Bastard. Moist.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
677,423,607
|
` :You would be correct. Even if this were an anthology series and the cast changed every season, the former seasons' cast stays listed in infobox regardless. — '''''' `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,426,813
|
== block == what did i do then, i only added info not removed and disruptive edditing
| 2,015
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
677,435,088
|
` == Precious == film awards Thank you for quality articles on film and awards, such as 13th Empire Awards and Done In 60 Seconds Award, for creating redirects and categories, for project film maintenance and for , - you are an awesome Wikipedian! `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
677,453,846
|
:Why? Because nobody's taken it on themselves to do a better job. Go for it!
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
677,490,695
|
` :::::I don't think you can spike content because ``they can't possibly know that, it's a secret!`` We are not here to judge the methods of our sources. I don't think it is for you or anyone else to say a source is in error, because you think it is in error, absent other sources. The source is investigative journalism. Investigative journalism is by definition bring to light things others prefer to keep hidden. Please refrain from deleting the well-referenced, neutral, conformant contributions of your colleagues without basis. May I respectfully ask again, please provide a reliable source that contradicts the contended content. Thank you. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,491,060
|
` : I disagree, but I don't feel strongly about it enough to revert your WikiProject removal again, if you wish. - `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
677,521,602
|
` *I support the photo of the Tesla and Smart ED together. I have stated here on this page for a long time that the lead photo needs to include an EV that does not look like a glorified golf cart. Here at last, we see both types of electric vehicles charging, both clearly EV's. The photo is reasonable, and long overdue. `
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,528,324
|
:I didn't make any changes whatsoever to what you and I discussed. And I said to our fellow editor that while I personally agreed with him, I was advising against making changes would result in discord. You can read for yourself what I wrote.
| 2,015
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
677,551,587
|
` == Properly converting meters to feet == Since I'm blocked from editing, could someone please fix the conversion templates used on the articles I edited? Your converter thinks 1 meter equals 3.3 feet. Thus, 27.3 m is converted into 90 feet. One meter is actually 3.281 feet, which would make 27.3 meters 89.57 feet. These figures aren't ``guesstimates`` as one editor naively assumed. Could someone please remedy this? `
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
677,555,073
|
:There is of course more than enough information on templates at Wikipedia:Templates. But what you are looking to do is to just add , or the like, to something you are already familiar editing with. To put two historical populations tables together you would use a table (Help:Table). To put Template:Historical populations into the template space for a city specific table, you would be using Template:Historical populations as a meta-template, which it is currently not designed for. I suggest asking at Template talk:Historical populations that it can be used in the template space by adding , or similar, to it.
| 2,015
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.