Datasets:
dirtycomputer
/
Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
675,470,426
: Can you please elaborate? What is unacceptable in calling vandal a person who is vandalizing that article for weeks? Are you sure you blocked the right person? Where were you when I called for help? I have done it many times, I have even created a dispute resolution thread for this. I complained on the ANI. I am doing everything possible to stop these people spreading hate and propaganda, don't you see? Talk to the other users involved, or read the talk page of Spiro Koleka. It is all there.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,471,172
:: In the meanwhile, no time is being lost to revert my edit in another page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spyromilios&oldid;=675469455&diff;=prev
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,472,876
== Poor little F.A.G.G.O.T. == Sucks to be you, you ugly 30 year old virgin.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
true
675,474,958
:::: Not sure who you are, never seen your username before, however I am replying to this. Perhaps your definition of vandal is the one you gave me. Defacing the encyclopedia you say. What about defacing a dead man and his family, including myself. It is a family member of mine this article is about. My family! You do not care, but I do.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
675,479,447
:::: Another revert! This guy is doing nothing to hide his agenda. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spiro_Koleka&diff;=675471550&oldid;=675452574
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
675,481,145
I have had some help from other editors and their contributions I value very much. They bring knowledge based on published sources and common knowledge. You say I am close to the subject, that is true, but I have copied all the material from third party sources, most of them are in English and all can be accessed online free of charge. There have not been any inaccuracies identified in my text, I am the one who is challenging the two Greek/Serbian authors. Their sources are not accurate and they are not based on official records.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,492,699
I agree, the structure is incorrect. In addition to the electroneutrality principle, which predicts that electrons will be distributed in such a way that the charges on all atoms of a species are as close to zero as possible, Linus Pauling noted that if a negative charge is present, it should reside on the most electronegative atoms. The Pauling electronegativities of nitrogen and oxygen are 3.0 and 3.5, respectively. Therefore I would predict that the structure would be K+ O- (single bond) C (triple bond) N.
2,015
false
article
random
test
false
675,507,824
` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Original Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Hello can you help me to improve my article about ryan rens |}`
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
675,532,924
` == A cheeseburger for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Hi softlavender i see you reverted almost all my edit without any prior i know my edit is helpful to an article please before revert edits say why you revert it ok thanks and i ask theres any place to report an admin like you you use reverting in a wrong way reverting is only on vandalism as i know ok leave me a message |}`
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
675,538,075
` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Original Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Are you mad did you know my effort for editing then you do revert why? Make talk to me you do is vandalism truly |}`
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,546,695
` == In regards to wishful thinking == ``Due to Leuchter's ignorance of the large disparity between the amounts of cyanide necessary to kill humans and lice, instead of disproving the homicidal use of gas chambers, the small amounts of cyanide which Leuchter detected actually tended to confirm it.[8]`` It doesn't explain how it tended to confirm it, also this whole sentence is presented as fact like everything else in this biased article. Thus I'm assuming it's wishful thinking and only here to discredit Leutcher. `
2,015
false
article
blocked
dev
false
675,547,744
== Yes you made a mistake == The whole article is there to discredit Leuchter, thus It needs to be rewritten on the basis of NPOV, my edits are there just to balance things out a bit
2,015
false
user
blocked
test
false
675,548,144
:: I'm only talking about this quote, although other lies on this article should be removed as well.
2,015
false
article
blocked
test
false
675,563,099
` EDIT: The statement can be removed just on the basis that it adds no value to the article by making it even more biased towards enabling the Holocaust all over wikipedia. It assumes that - Leuchter doesn't know the amounts of cyanide needed to kill, and it assumes that Leuchter tried to disprove the gas chambers through ignoring the facts. Both of these without any proof that that's actually the case. Also, even if that was the case - what does ``tended to confirm it`` mean? Even safe amounts of gas found by any interested parties would ``tend to confirm`` that gassings took place, so it's irrelevant. In general, the whole article is focused on disproving the Leuchter report instead of displaying the Leutcher report - that's why it needs to be rewritten.`
2,015
false
article
blocked
train
false
675,572,825
Your assumptions are wrong.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
675,593,417
== Dhoti (Racial Slur) == I have redirected the above article, which claimed that the term dhoti is used in Nepal as an epithet for Indians, to this page (version before redirection). Since that article didn't cite any sources, I am not adding this claim to the dhoti article yet, but if anyone can find a reliable source verifying that such usage is widespread, it would be worth a brief mention.
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
675,597,229
:::: I posted my question here: Wikipedia:Help desk#How to solicit more input in a discussion to reach consensus. Check it out. Thanks.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,607,500
`:::::::::Erik, where have I argued that stating ``[This film] has one of the worst receptions outside of being a Marvel film`` or similar should be included in this article? To be clear, I am not arguing that. So it doesn't need to be verifiable. I was making an argument on this talk page with regard to you seemingly believing that this film has a run-of-the-mill negative reception, when it so clearly does not have a run-of-the-mill negative reception. It it did, various WP:Reliable sources would not be making such a big deal about its Rotten Tomatoes, its CinemaScore rating, and similar. Various WP:Reliable sources use words to describe to this film's reception in ways that prove my point about it not having a run-of-the-mill negative reception. And that is what I mean about this film having one of the worst receptions for a film (critically-speaking and box office-wise). That's my common sense talking. But acting like this film d `
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
675,646,075
`\ ::No, it doesn't. I know the Hebrew language and so do most of the sources linked on this and the Tetragrammaton page and not one of them will tell you that. Do not make things up to support your arguments.   `
2,015
true
article
blocked
dev
false
675,647,636
==Contested Prod== I think this report from Gartner shows sufficient notability that the prod was not appropriate.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,654,992
== WP:Exceptional == Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. Given the obvious WP:COI on this article, please provide these exceptional sources and discuss them here before removing any tags related to accuracy.
2,015
true
article
blocked
dev
false
675,656,421
Complex Systems Governance == CSG is an emerging field focused on performance of functions necessary to maintain viability (existence) of a complex system. A reference model has been developed for CSG. A three staged approach to CSG development is suggested by Keating et al. This approach includes three primary stages for developing CSG: Initialization, Readiness Assessment, and Development. == Engaging in CSG Development == To engage in CSG development, several issues must first be considered. One objective is to examine CSG development issues for their potential to impact the effectiveness of a CSG effort, particularly the design, execution, and the ultimate evolution of CSG. This article explores those issues with emphasis on implications for development. == Background Charles B. Keating articulates a path forward for continued elaboration of the first generation CSG development methodology in Complex System Governance Development: A First Generation Methodology.
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
675,663,913
REDIRECT Talk:OVIK Cameleon IV440 Modular Mission Vehicle
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
675,692,863
:Yeah, they're both puff-pieces written with obvious COI. One puff article is better than 2.
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
675,699,260
`well, I disagree with his assertion that ``some of these events [are not] murder until [the shooters] have been convicted in court of law.`` However, with regard to distinguishing mass shooting from mass murder`
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
675,757,268
` == HK 1967 riots == nuffin regarding the Hong Kong 1967 Leftist riots? it is also kind of terrorism, left wing, communist, terrorism! － , `
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
675,790,995
` == working women emphasis == Why is working women emphasized under Social activism? If an implication needs to be made shouldn't it be ``working women`` rather than vaguely suggesting it? If not should I remove the emphasis?   `
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,795,949
Jan. 1, 1998 http://www.nytco.com/who-we-are/culture/our-history/#2000-1971-timeline
2,015
false
article
random
dev
false
675,808,934
== Scientific analysis and historic/official data used by foreign authors when writing about S.K. == Hello I am back. I know a couple of you missed me. Has anyone found any proof of Spiro Koleka (meaning also the Koleka clan) to be Greek? If this is the case please share. Any unscientific claims by Pettifer or authors referring to him in their books' bibliographies are excluded. So far the problem is identified with Pettifer, so we put him aside and treat him and the authors pointing at him separately. To the Greek editors here, please use your own state archives to find where the Kolekas live in Greece and when did they live there. Or find their properties there, or some house, a single grave, a single piece of paper written in Greek by anyone of them. Or find when did they last leave from Greece please, or how many were/are they. I want to know. Find some church records (in Albania or Greece), get some proof so you can save face and make me shut up. How difficult can it be to find something Greek in this important man? How come all his children never left any Greek notes somewhere or are not part of some Greek facebook group? How come Spiro's daughter writes poetry books and articles in Albanian and not single one in modern Greek language? Is this family really ashamed to be Greek or is it just (*drumroll*) not greek! How about you Zoupan and Alexikoua for once be not so sure about yourselves. How about some critical thinking applied in this article? I challenge the scientific and historic foundation of your sources.
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
675,816,323
== Northern Epirus == how can this man be born in Northern Epirus when that imaginary territory was first called with that name in 1913, while this man died 33 years earlier? Please clarify your claim, since you reverted my edit.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,822,431
Well, I'm going to change the title to 'synthetic cannabinoids.' If any one objects, speak now.
2,015
false
article
random
train
false
675,830,936
== Warning == I appreciate it. And thank you for not suspending me outright, I'm still learning how to play this game. -)
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
675,838,531
== overview == Should I tell interpol that you support extremism??
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
675,859,946
::^ Yup. It's one of the most notable things about SIOA. – ⋅
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
675,883,191
` *Checklinks: no dead links. ° `
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
675,889,221
` == Some baklava for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I ask is there any place to report abused editor like you all my edit you revert without any information why you do that you do really an vandalism |}`
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
675,895,180
` == Your requesting aborting my move of Nike, Inc. == What you stated in your request is in error in two ways. You stated: ``Reverting a move made without discussion. ``Nike, Inc.`` complies more closely with WP:NCCORP (using the legal status is the first preference listed to disambiguate) and is actually used as an example in paragraph three.`` First, there needed to be no discussion prior to moving. Period. Second, the WP:NCCOMP guideline states at the beginning ``The legal status suffix of a company (such as Inc., plc, LLC, and those in other languages such as GmbH, AG, and S.A.) is not normally included in the article title,`` which indicates that the preferred state is to avoid using things like ``Inc.`` in the title. It goes on to say that, yes, it is allowed, and I am not going to bother with pursuing this further; however, I will put a note on the talk page indicating that the preference based on a move and revert is to leave the article title as Nike, Inc. I did look for any prior actions or discussions related to the title of this article before I contemplated changing it; in other words, I did check to see a controversy had arisen in the past, and seeing none, took action. The example of Nike, Inc. in WP:NCCOMP does not endorse or lock in the article at that title; it is simply an example. User:Ceyockey ('') :Hi , if you read WP:NCCORP, you will see that the reason legal status is not normally included in an article title is because it is usually not needed. However, when disambiguation is needed, the legal status is the first form of disambiguation listed. In fact Nike, Inc.'' is used as an example in paragraph three, which discusses the use or not of a comma in an article title which includes legal status. Furthermore, adding a parenthetical to an article title causes editors to have to use a piped link every time the company is mentioned and hyperlinked, whereas using the legal status is immediately comprehensible as the specific company, unpiped, and differentiated from both all other uses of ``Nike`` and also from Nike's various sub-brands, labels, subsidiaries, projects, etc. ::I believe you are reading too much into the order of items. Legal status, ``(company)`` and ``other suffix`` are only prioritized by order in the text; as far as I am concerned, they are on equal footing ... which is why I did not escalate the issue over the current article. As I stated above, just because the article in question is used as an example means nothing ... it was a convenience and not meant to establish a precedent (or so I infer based on how text like this is usually composed). We agree to disagree. I am not on a spree. I do feel that removal of the 'legal status' element is preferable as a company's life cycle is not defined by its legal status. As noted above, I've put a hopefully neutral passage on the Nike, Inc. talk page ... which is something I would do if I found prior conflict related to other companies. I am not a big fan of precedence-first, but the building of Wikipedia is all about compromise, not rules enforcement. Be well. User:Ceyockey ('''') ::P.S. I've found the template to be useful recently. See if you find it useful as well.`
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
675,904,170
` ::Ah, I wasn't intending to suggest we use scare quotes. Just (sarcastically) that it could link to prostitute if that's what we were trying to imply. It's already surrounded by quotes I think. Anyway, thanks for fixing it.   `
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,904,659
` Since she does have controversial statements on race, including that bit on aboriginals, we should leave it under controversies or risk loosing WP:NEUTRAL. If you want to move the part about how well she was received by the black community I agree that it belongs in the ``life`` section.   `
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,907,130
` :::Aboriginal Australians for one.   `
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,922,688
` what have I done to get blocked? the only page I've really contributed to, I think you'll see I've improved. I'll blank ``edit goons`` since you're opposed `
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
675,923,004
` I still think 'edit goons' could have become notable if only you'd given her a chance to blossom. ``Let a hundred flowers bloom.``- Mao Zedong `
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,926,864
` == Please stop with your unreasoned edits to Hume == That's all. Think about what you're doing and take the time to read the page before making edits that make no sense. ``Highly influential`` needed a deletion in the opening sentence? Thwre is a whole section on influence. Wikipedia policies are not an excuse to not use your brain when editing. Thanks. `
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
675,930,416
Are you fucking serious? Again, what Hume have you read? Go fuck yourself, ignoramus. Stop trolling and spamming my talk page and spend the time actually getting an education and reading a book on philosophy for once in your life before you continue to make pointless, masturbatory edits on pages well beyond your comprehension. Please share, what is your interest i Hume beyond being a thorn in my side?
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
675,931,108
` That's fine, I wasn't that attached to this. I've tried to throw in a lot of cites to the new Routledge Hume by Garrett, which I regard as a fairly consensual, strong introductory source. Much of the material here that's been added is sourced to there, and I should probably cite it more often here. https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415283342 I'm hoping to add sections as well based on the SEP articles on ``Hume and Kant`` (there are actually more than 1) and the SEP article on ``Hume and Newtonianism``.`
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,931,240
The Kemp Smith book should also probably be mentioned more often, since it's historically important work on Hume.
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
675,931,371
I'd also wanted to mention Foucault on Hume in Order of Things, and Deleuze's book on Hume, to strike some balance between Analytic and Continental sources.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,931,782
Off the top of my head, these would all be useful additions. Maybe a slightly longer quotation from Isaiah Berlin, who also wrote quite a bit of interest on Hume, and is a rather notable historian of philosophy.
2,015
true
article
blocked
dev
false
675,933,774
Yes, that's precisely where much of the new material that's been added to this article has been drawn from. I do recommend it. It is more intended for general readers and as an introduction than the 1996 book as well, so probably more suitable for the encylopedia. And the Routledge series on great philosophers, is , I think very well regarded. I strongly recommend it.!!!
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
675,935,945
You must be a real loser and mental infant to try to block me when I've obviously improved that page, as a number of editors who have actrually read Hume and have an interest in him, strongly agree. Cheers.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
true
675,943,052
: - I've blocked the IP for a week. While researching, I found another blocked IP from NY who had a lot of intersections with the one you reported. Details here. If you see a flare up, please let me know.
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
675,944,496
== Total length doesn't match == From the Description section: : »Total length in both sexes, excluding the tusk of the male, can range from 3.95 to 5.5 m (13 to 18 ft). Males, at an average length of 4.1 m (13 ft 5 in), are slightly larger than females, with an average length of 3.5 m (11 ft 6 in).« The length for females can't reach from 3.95 m to something larger, with the average being 3.5. One of both sentences is wrong, I don't know which one.
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
675,945,545
:::::: By all means focus on the current delegates. I see they are nearly all red-linked. I just thought you might be personally interested in the historical figures, but please don't feel under any obligation.
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
675,962,528
Your way is overly convoluted, difficult to read, and way too loosey goosey on the one away list. Please limit one aways to guys who are at least semi-active. Santino is long retired. The way things were was fine as is with no complaints...if it ain't broke, don't fix it. When you have 2 editors telling you to back off, then it's kinda time to fold 'em.
2,015
true
article
blocked
dev
false
675,968,394
` Dennis Brown, nothing you've listed against me is new from the previous block on my edits on Coal, when I was a far younger, less seasoned editor. In any event ``Coal`` is just a hobby and many of my edits ultimately stayed there. I can see now that I was overzealous in my youth in accusing my opponents of being Coal industry lobbyists (although I wasn't actually serious in saying that). But I fail to see how any of your comments justify a block since none of the actions you've cited are new since my previous block. What you're proposing is essentially double-jeopardy, trying me twice for the same crime which I've already paid the penalty for. Also I was only blocked twice previously. Why does everyone keep saying this is my 4th block when the pages you link to clearly show it is only my 3rd? Why am I being so harshly punished for these good-faith, rookie mistakes? I am but a young, blooming flower who only wishes to blossom, and to let Wikipedia sing its siren song of Truth and Knowledge. `
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
675,970,249
` Also, everything you linked to Dennis Brown, was quite obviously meant as humor. ``ALL I DID WAS TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT COAL WITH SOURCES. Those who blocked me ARE IN THE POCKET OF BIG COAL AND I EXPOSED THEIR NEFARIOUS plots. Please FREE KINGSHOWMAN!`` Don't Wikipedia editors catch obvious attempts at humour? Perhaps you didn't find them funny, but they were meant as attempts at levity during the heated so-called ``Coal Wars``. I was also not entirely alone in the position I took there on coal which was simply that a paragraph needed to be added to the lead to reflect Coal's Health and Environmental Effects. I wasn't taking an unreasonable position, and you will now see, that thanks to my tireless, thankless efforts to improve this encylopedia, that information is now in the lead on Coal. (not through reverts by me, but by others who agreed with my position.) I have not edited coal since my block, so I'm not quite sure how it makes sense to blocvk me again for something that I haven't gone back to doing. Also, I did not harrass Flyer22. She harrassed me. May I relate the course of events, which you may verify? First of all, I stopped communicating with her since she requested that I do so. Second of all, she got steamed because I added a paragraph on Nietzsche to her ``Happiness`` article under the section ``Philsoophy of Happiness.`` Arguably (as other editors agreed) Nietzsche may have something valuable to say here, and I very quiickly made a summary of the SEP article on Nietzsche's moral philosophy on this topic. No, it wasn't perfect and the referencing could have used improvement, but it was better than omitting it and leaving readers with a somewhat one-sided impression of the Great Philosophers on Happiness. Flyer22 reverted my edit, giving a basically spurious reason: ``Unsourced`` as I recall. But it was directed to THE MOST RELIABLE source on Philosophy, by general and academic consensus, the SEP. It would in fact be very easy to improve a great deal of Wiki Philosophy articles by just having editors sum up information from this wonderful free, peer-reviewed, academically rigorous resource. Then, withouit provocation, after I asked her what exactly she found problematic about including Nietzsche in a list of philosophers who have written about Happiness, including similar statured luminaries like Augustine, Aquinas, Aristotle, Mill, etc. she responded, not by listing what was wrong with my Happiness edit, but by telling me ``ALL OF YOUR EDITS ARE POOR, PURE AND SIMPLE. YOU ARE A POOR EDITOR.`` I thought this was rather rude and ignorant, especfially as she saw fit to specifically attack my Hume edits (when Hume was not under discussion) telling me ``your edits on Hume largely consit of such (read=poor) edits and I'm tempted to revert them.`` Since I hate to see a poor soul suffering under the weight of such crushing temptation, I gave in to the temptation myself, and deleted all of my contributions from this encylopedia. Within hours, a throng of rebellion began to emerge,. a grass-roots protest movement which demanded the immediate return of all the much-loved Kingshowman edits to the encylopedia. Editors rushed to my defense. I told Flyer22 to eat crow and admit that, contra her opinion, my Hume edits and contributions to this beloved tome of knowledge were not so poor after all. She declined and escalated her attacks. She was the one who harrassed me, and I thought we were done with this sordid little episode until she popped back up, eager to participate in the latest round of mob justice. Kingshowman`
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,970,651
Daniel, perhaps you would do well to review the Wikipedia page on counting] or Mathematics to help us come to consensus on this. Please do share what the 4 blocks were for, if you count 4. As I see it, you are double-counting a single-block to strengthen your flimsy case against me. Please check more carefully before making false claims in the future. I have improved this encylopedia. I stopped edit warring. I left Flyer22 alone, even though she was rude and nasty to me for no reason. I have no longer even been editing coal but sticking to my core expertise where I can most help the encylopedia, and as far as I can tell, the most reason block has been claimed for crimes I have already been punished for. Is there no Wikipedia policy on Double Jeopardy?
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,971,111
` Also, everything you linked to Dennis Brown, was quite obviously meant as humor. ``ALL I DID WAS TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT COAL WITH SOURCES. Those who blocked me ARE IN THE POCKET OF BIG COAL AND I EXPOSED THEIR NEFARIOUS plots. Please FREE KINGSHOWMAN!`` Don't Wikipedia editors catch obvious attempts at humour? Perhaps you didn't find them funny, but they were meant as attempts at levity during the heated so-called ``Coal Wars``. I was also not entirely alone in the position I took there on coal which was simply that a paragraph needed to be added to the lead to reflect Coal's Health and Environmental Effects. I wasn't taking an unreasonable position, and you will now see, that thanks to my tireless, thankless efforts to improve this encylopedia, that information is now in the lead on Coal. (not through reverts by me, but by others who agreed with my position.) I have not edited coal since my block, so I'm not quite sure how it makes sense to blocvk me again for something that I haven't gone back to doing.`
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,972,196
` Dennis, I'd really love to hear an answer as to why my Coal edits are relevant here. I've stopped editing coal, and this consitutesDouble Jeopardy since I've already been punished for this and have done nothing since then. Dan is also missspeaking when he says there were 4 blocks, there were 3, and one ``change of block settings``. Unless ``words no longer have meaning`` to quote that great curmudgeon Antonin Scalia, that means there were 3 blocks, not 4. And this one is somewhat strange since I seem to be getting blocked again for the same problem. Obviously my edits have improved from my first week at the encylopedia, but I keep getting unloaded on for my youthful indiscretions. Also, Flyer22 has been following me around reverting my edits since I first did her the indignity of adding a minor, brief, referenced note on Sigmund Freud's theories to her beloved childhood page, which has little to no useful philosophical material, and yet is classed as a high importance, low quality philosophy, with begging for improvement (``If you can improve this page, please do so. It has little or no material``) then afterwards, she began to follow me around to other philosophy pages, and reverting my work with dishonest comments in the edit summary given as reasons. Yes, I did get annoyed at this, but I think it was rather uncivil to tell a new editor that their edits are ``poor, pure and simple`` don't you? Especially when she doesn't seem to actually posssess any abiding interest in the topics I edit other than the fact that they are my topics, and she wishes to see me be annoyed and removed from editing this website? I'd really like a response, Dan, since I don't see how the coal quotations from prior to my previous block are germane at all here. `
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
675,981,655
`== A kitten for you! == Cooper eats purrrrrrger `
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,011,310
from the Charlotte Observer article
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
676,036,810
` == Advice == I apologize for your recent difficulties, your block was clearly undeserved. Our governance here at Wikipedia is imperfect and too often administrators abuse the power we grant them. While we can’t prevent it we can work around it - in this case by creating a new identity to bypass your block - what we call a ``sockpuppet`` account. Officially it’s frowned upon but so long as it’s undetected a sockpuppet is just as functional as a regular account. In fact many current and former administrators are sockpuppet accounts. The instructions below provide an easy guide to creating your new account and avoiding detection. Instructions # Log out of your Wikipedia account, clear your cookies (google ``how to clear all cookies`` for instructions) and close your browser # Download a new browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer. This will be your dedicated Wikipedia browser # Follow these instructions to permanently disable javascript in your new browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer # And these to permanently disable java: All browsers # Reset your IP address. With most ISPs the procedure is as follows: unplug your modem, wait 10 minutes, plug it back in. Use this website (http://www.whatsmyip.org/) to check your IP address before and after to verify it's changed. If it has, great, if not you may have to wait a few hours or a few days before repeating this procedure successfully # Now you're ready to register your new Wikipedia account Tips :* Never log into your old account from the same network or with the same browser as your new account :* Don't choose an account name similar to your old account name; administrators will use that as an excuse to sanction you :* Don't edit your user page or your talk page straight away; it's a dead giveaway you’re not a new user. Remember, this user is “new” to Wikipedia :* Mess up a little - forget to sign or sign incorrectly, split someone's comment “accidentally” - everything to give the impression this is your first experience editing Wikipedia :* Avoid noticeboards and contentious articles until you’ve made a reasonable number of edits; sockpuppet or not experienced Wikipedians don't appreciate being held to community standards by new users All done. Happy editing and welcome back. I hope your new experience will be more pleasant.    — John Whales, Founder and CEO of the World Wide Web This user's real life identity is verified by the following SHA-1 hash: `
2,015
false
user
blocked
dev
false
676,070,963
Condolences to his family. I am still stunned. I will miss Paul.
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
676,107,920
::: Pink Floyd's popularity in the US during 1968–72 wasn't nearly what it was in the UK, their first album to go Gold in the US was The Dark Side of the Moon. As for the Grammy award, for rock artists those awards, especially the minor ones, are often based on name recognition and are something of a dubious honor. I'd leave that one out.
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
676,113,841
GA Review :This review is transcluded from Talk:Suillus luteus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer:   · Happy to offer a review, but only a few minutes right now. I'll offer an initial few comments and then finish up later tonight/tomorrow.
2,015
true
article
random
dev
false
676,119,171
-importance=}} {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=yes|atlanta
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
676,127,423
== UFC 191 == How about you look at the references you little twenty-something year old wrestling superhero fanboy. It clearly states on UFC.com(reference #15) the order of the bouts and like I mentioned before it's also pretty damn obvious what it would be.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,133,983
== UFC 191 == 1999, really? Anyway, look here: http://i.imgur.com/1MBbOZU.jpg
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
676,142,336
== UFC 191 == Hey kid apparently the bout order is different on the mobile version of UFC.com but I still disagree on the way they arranged those first three bouts. Hopefully they change it soon enough to match the mobile version of the website which I believe makes more sense.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,156,576
` == UFC 191 == You say ``LMAO``, you use emojis, and your username says 1999 for no apparent reason? Your not fooling anyone, you 15-year-old brat. Stop vandalizing articles with your BS. I don't care if you thought it was obvious, your opinion versus official sources means absolutely nothing. Hit the bricks. `
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
true
676,158,424
== Some help. == Hey man. Can you help me with this guy who keeps vandalizing the UFC 191 page? Look at his edit summaries. They're quite amusing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UFC_191&action;=history
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,158,897
== UFC 191 == THIS IS THE FINALIZED BOUT ORDER, DUMBASS. IT'S NOT GONNA CHANGE TO WHAT YOU WANT: http://i.imgur.com/1MBbOZU.jpg
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,159,094
::Report us both. It's too late now and it's what's best for all.
2,015
true
user
blocked
test
false
676,164,694
` ==Comment by == It is NOT acceptable at all that Rasgulla or Roshogolla was created at Odisha. The primary ingredient of Rossogolla is Chhana or cottage cheese. The Indians first learnt the art of making chhana from the French/Portuguese who stayed in a colony at Chandannagore in Hoogli District, West Bengal during the British Raj. In fact, this art of curdling milk into Chhana was considered a taboo by the Hindus and no Chhana products were allowed inside temples or offerred for any holy ritual. Consequently, it is not possible that Rossogolla was created in Odisha centuries back when the art of making Chhana was first learnt not before the later half of 18th Century or the first half of 19th Century. Moreover, it cannot be offerred at Puri temple as Chhana was considered taboo as milk which was considered very holy had to be curdled to make Chhana. It is only in 1868 that the Rossogolla was first created in Bagbazar, North Kolkata in West Bengal. FACT-1 The Hindu female deity Lakshmi is served rasagollas on the last day of the annual Rath Jatra festival at Puri. This is a 600+ year old tradition called NILADRI BIJAY. FACT-2 The word cheese is derived from Latin Caseus that comes from Sanskrit Kaasi indicating that chhena was made in India in ancient times. FACT-3 Even in the rest of Bengal, outside Kolkata, it is the larger, browner Oriya version of rasagolla that is prepared. The K. C. Das/Ganguram chewy “sponge” rasagolla is confined only to Kolkata. FACT-4 The only Portuguese cheese in Kolkata is the Bandel cheese which is very salty and smoked. It is available in New Market, and Anglo-Indians usually buy it. It is totally different from sweet chhena dishes. FACT-5 Even the Bengali dish Sondesh predates the arrival of the Portuguese. FACT-6 All true Portuguese origin dishes – Bibenca, Vindaloo (Vin de Alho in portuguese), Kaju (Caju in Portuguese.), Batata (Batata in Portuguese), have Portuguese sounding names. But chhena does not sound like Queijo in Portuguese. FACT-7 The Portuguese arrived in Baleshwar, Orissa at the same time as Bengal. FACT-8 Even KT Achaya merely hypothesized Portuguese origin (and was wrong). It took a chauvinist Bengali writer Chitrita Banerjee to stake a formal Bengali claim to the rasagolla. Her book is so narrowly focussed on Bengali readership that she freely uses Bengali terms everywhere, making it difficult for non-Bengalis to even read. FACT-9 Even if the Portuguese were to have introduced chhena to India (which is wrong), the timeline is enough for the Puri temple cooks to have picked it up and incorporated it into the temple cuisine. FACT-10 Rasagolla has been cooked in Salepur for one and a half centuries. FACT-11 Milk curdling from whey was done way back in 12th century India (See P. Arundhati's book,`` The Royal Life in Manasollasa,``, Sundeep Prakashan, 1994.) FACT-12 Rasagolla is made from whey-curdled milk. Even if KT Achaya was correct, the Portuguese would simply have shown Bengalis how to curdle milk from acid. It has no bearing on the history of rasagolla. FACT-13 The K C Das site also claims that Nobin Das wanted to patent rasgulla. Except that there was no patent law in India those days! The first ever legislation to protect intellectual property law had just been introduced in India! It was Act VI of 1856 on Protection of Inventions. It granted ``exclusive privileges`` to the inventor. The legislation was designed only to safeguard British colonial interests. The first real patent law enacted in India was the Indian Patents and Designs Act 1911. Even this law was to safeguard British colonial interests and not designed to protect Indian inventors. This led to the Indian Patents Act of 1970: the first patent law designed to protect the likes of Indian inventors such as Nobin Das, which was over a century since he masqueraded as the creator of the rasgulla.`
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
676,168,549
` == Vandalizing == At first I wasn't even aware that the order of the first three bouts on the mobile version of the website was different from the official version. I found out through him sending me an image of the official website. Since it was only an image, I checked the website just in case and was shocked to find out that that was indeed the order that they had on there. I did not and still do not have any proof that the mobile version of the website is ``outdated`` as he stated. When I made the edits (prior to my knowledge of mobile being different from the official website) I chose to not change or add a reference because When I clicked on the already present website reference, it automatically took me to the mobile version, being that I was using my mobile device to make the edits. Due to prior research of the fighters involved in the first three bouts and common knowledge of the sport, all common sense and logic led to me believing (like I always did) that the order of the bouts on the mobile version was the correct one. As soon as I found out the mobile version and official version were different I re-edited the page to rearrange the bouts to the most logical order and changed the prior reference from the official site to the mobile. I was never aware that you guys didn't accept mobile versions of websites with more logical information as references until I read his complaint and your response. I apologize if I caused any inconvenience or misunderstanding on your website. My main intentions were to help improve and accurate the content on the page based on my knowledge and common sense. Also keep in mind that I'm a new user on this website and still have things to learn about it. It was all a learning experience for me from beginning to end. ( ).`
2,015
true
user
blocked
dev
false
676,171,199
Get bent fagot.
2,015
false
user
blocked
dev
true
676,171,533
` When you fagots decide to edit wikipedia is it a tough call between editing and tattooing the word ``loser`` on your forehead? Tattoo might have been less embarrassing. Later asslickers. `
2,015
false
user
blocked
test
true
676,198,614
== request to change the number of speaker == Indian govt sourcehttp://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/india/Final_PPT_2011_chapter3.pdfhttp://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/india/Final_PPT_2011_chapter5.pdf said that there are 80.06 million people speaks Urdu in India.while around 94% Pakistanis can speak and understand Urdu so the total number of speakers should be mention more than 200 millions
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
676,214,614
:Thanks! It's 'a few guys' (also 'four cats')—from Catalan.
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
676,220,197
EDIT to add: Happy Squirrel, above me, is on the money. They said basically everything I said before me, and I now look like a fool who can't read; my comeuppance for not reading properly before I post, I guess!.
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
676,248,675
:: In the meanwhile the text about Himara being predominantly Greek is just provocative and unrelated to this article. I want that removed as it is just there to confuse and misinform the public. Predominantly means more than 50%. If this can be proven I will rest my case.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
676,264,127
== sortability == Kinda-kludge-driven, but sortable, with last-in-office-date. About the same amount of screen-real-estate as the rough-draft-with-sorting-disabled-at-the-moment. Both of these, obviously, need way less screen-real-estate than option#F or other v-table designs with row-of-pics (one pic per cell). There is an option, to disassociate the pics from the one-per-cell style, and build option#J or something, which is a v-table for the text-info, with a gallery-to-the-right (or option#K with a staggered-double-row-barreled-gallery). I've not built such a thing, because I don't want an unsortable v-table, but I can help you build one or both if you think they might be valuable/viable options. p.s. Option#G 'seems' to use more screen-real-estate than option#E, but really does not; I just haven't figured out how to make the option#G imagesizes smaller! ;-)       p.p.s. I don't know what that WP:Co-op thing is, must be new, but I know that JethroBT is a human (not a bot despite the username), and worth your time hanging out with, if you wish.
2,015
false
user
random
test
false
676,295,062
: What does policy say about templating experienced editors? With adminship comes the expectation one's familiar with the rules they're enforcing. Missteps are expected, it's important to recognize and learn from them. Best of luck.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
676,295,822
` — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
676,297,632
:It is not attested with that name in other Celtic cultures, but similar celebrations are indeed found in the other modern Celtic cultures. Do some research on Calan Gaeaf in Wales, for instance.
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
676,299,618
:Reads a bit like a consolation prize for those who didn't make the top 100. I am sure it is an honor, but I'm not sure how meaningful a one it is.
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
676,302,084
:::Thanks CactusWriter. —  /
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,308,764
` == Gaza Strip == The source you restored, ``Why does Israel supply Gaza with electricity and cement?``, is an opinion piece, not a news article. Per WP:NEWSORG, a section of Wikipedia's guideline concerning reliable sources, opinion pieces are not considered reliable sources for statements of fact. The source you added, ``Guide: Gaza under blockade``, does not support the information in the sentence you restored. —  / `
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,308,972
== WP:ARBPIA alert == —  /
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,311,003
self-appointed dictator of public opinion
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
676,311,060
Suck my dick and swallow
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
true
676,334,436
because I'm gay and love to suck cock
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
true
676,334,729
==Talk:List_of_most_populous_cities_in_India#Requested_move_16_August_2015== You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List_of_most_populous_cities_in_India#Requested_move_16_August_2015. Thanks.
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
676,379,396
:That's what I'm saying. It shouldn't be a redirect. It should be an article. Socialism has played every bit as big a role in Chinese history as it had in the histories of Brazil, Canada, Estonia, India, Netherlands, New Zealand, Pakistan, United Kingdom, and United States.
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
676,401,226
::The only activities mentioned are track and field events, I doubt it had other. ——
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
676,406,387
Please review before continuing to fight vandalism == Recently, you placed several warnings on user talk pages that did not make sense. See . You claimed that all of these were automatic, and you had nominated them for deletion due to creating multiple redirects: . Redirects are WP:CHEAP, and creating many plausible redirects is perfectly acceptable. In fact, it's desirable, as it aids in navigating the wiki. You nominated these for speedy deletion as per WP:G3, which is for obvious vandalism. You may wish to review what vandalism is and is not at WP:VANDALISM, as creating plausible redirects certainly is not vandalism. Unless someone intends to damage the wiki purposefully, it is not vandalism. Without an intent to do harm, it is at most disruptive editing. In this case, it was neither, as redirects are explicitly for plausible search terms. When nominating articles for deletion, there is a check box in Twinkle that you can uncheck to not send a notice when placing a deletion nomination. Most of the time this should be checked, but when nominating multiple articles from the same author with the same reason, it is better to send one notice and then manually write a note to them saying that the notice also includes the other pages. Leaving duplicate notices on their page may overwhelm well-meaning editors, and can be a form of biting. Additionally, the last warning you placed as a final warning for vandalism was entirely unwarranted. The level 4 warnings should only be used after multiple previous warnings have been given or in situations that are particularly egregious (such as obvious vandalism that is clearly intentional, causes serious damage, and spans many articles before being caught). This is not a warning that can be placed automatically, so you had to have pressed several buttons to place it using Twinkle. Please be more careful when placing warning templates. Misusing warning templates can drive away good editors or editors who have good intentions but just need some help to be productive. A new editor who mistakenly receives a level 4 warning will almost never come back to the wiki, and so placing unwarranted warnings can be disruptive. I do not doubt your good intentions, but if you drive away even a handful of good editors while reverting vandalism, the overall effect may well be a net negative. Before continuing to patrol new pages and revert vandalism, please review what vandalism is, the criteria for speedy deletion, our guideline on biting newcomers, and consider enrolling in the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy for further training on how to deal with vandalism. I definitely welcome your contributions to the project, but this is an area where speed doesn't matter and accuracy is very important. Taking a few hours or even a week or more to learn how to effectively fight vandalism will result in you being a better editor and more able to contribute to the project. Thanks for reading this, and if you have any questions about anything (either this message or any policy, etc), feel free to respond here or on my talk page. ~ ==
2,015
true
user
random
dev
false
676,412,180
== Zurich Airport Circle == I think that is the case to create new section Zurich Airport Circle in Zurich Airport. Do you think is a great idea or not?
2,015
true
article
blocked
dev
false
676,460,415
` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Original Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Thanks for your expansion of Ta-Nehisi Coates! —  / |}`
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
676,497,226
== Merger proposal == I propose that Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002 be merged into Wildlife_Protection_Act,_1972. I think that the content in the Wild_Life_(Protection)_Amendment_Act,_2002 article can easily be explained in the context of Wildlife_Protection_Act,_1972, Principle Act. See WP:MERGEREASON and the Wildlife_Protection_Act,_1972 article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002 will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. priyadarshivishal23
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
676,509,397
::::::Sorry for the delay, Matilda! :::::::Gotta love those EPL only, Man City fanboys... Couldn't name a national team player, but still hold an opinion that the A-League will never be as good as the NSL (which they never saw a match of). Keogh's payments sound farcical. I hope that this year is a lot more stable, as the Glory showed a lot of promise. Success this year could breed success for a while to come, but you're right... A lot of that comes with keeping the same core of players. Those pricetags to see Malaga, Liverpool and other Euro teams is a joke. How much more expensive are AFL GF tickets? I'd rather that anyday than seeing 2 stars and 9 reserves defeat a lacklustre A-League club 2-0 for a similar price. ::::::Those Qs and As... I think they're meant to be involved in high traffic pages like the World Cup or the UEFA Champions League, as they can be added and deleted within half a week. Relegation is also a funny one, too. Take Marconi for instance. As much as I've included the R next to their name, they were technically still alive until the last week, (even though they were like 3 wins behind safety), because the NSW NPL setup takes into account reserves and under 18s results aswell and weighs them up to give relegation to the lowest overall club. You'd think we'd want to make it simple, but nooooooo. Hahaha. Also, do you have any thoughts about the NPL SA comp slimming to 12 teams for 2016? -
2,015
true
user
random
train
false