dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
688,977,263	the board members are for PRG... just called info centre as per ASX site	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
688,979,895	Please update board to PRG as per ASX site.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
688,985,511	http://www.smh.com.au/business/skilled-group-ceo-angus-mckay-steps-down-as-mining-downturn-bites-20150804-girike.html it is a correct edit ASX site is uptodate.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,002,898	== What happen to you? == It takes hard effort to contribute here.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
689,011,364	` *Strong Oppose precisely for the reason that ``bullying and suicide`` are apples and oranges as you have stated so clearly. Bullying is by no means the sole precursor to suicide, and suicide is not the inevitable result of bulling. You state that it is a neologism. In 2001 it was. Many years have passed since then and the term is in common parlance. It is, indeed, the common name of suicide the is a direct result of bullying. The inherent ambiguity is addressed in the article itself, or was in an earlier version. That clarification of the ambiguity needs to return if it has been removed. Bullycide the term became a noted phenomenon. The word crossed the lips of the US president. I feel strongly that more than a redirect is required. It is the term that is important. :When you state that it was uncontroversially moved you are in error. It was simply not noticed until you had done the deed. When I noticed it I moved it back. The irony is that you took a long time to notice that before starting this conversation. You are simply expressing WP:IDONTLIKEIT with the current and correct title. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,034,299	` * The coverage must be in a place that Wikipedia would consider reliable. Like I said on the draft, most hackers and web personalities will not gain coverage in places Wikipedia would consider reliable - especially since most will not want this type of coverage and will want to keep themselves as private as possible, as is the case here. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
689,034,609	` ===Infobox/Lead=== * Anuman Interactive is a port developer and should not be listed * Remove unlinkable engine per Template:video game reviews * Some citations in the release fields seem to be in the wrong place. You can actually remove them per WP:LEADCITE * June 6–7, 2011? Why it has two release dates? * - Infobox calls Microïds is the game's developer instead of publisher * Development information is too light in the game's lead. I suggest to add a new paragraph summarizing the game's development and move to it * Plot was covered too much in the lead. can be cut. * Gameplay information is needed for the lead * - ``a`` positive reception, or generally positive ``reviews`` * - don't know what ``it`` is. visuals? * - remove ``great``, change ``in its original release`` to ``since its original release``. When exactly did the game reach this sales figure? ===Plot=== * The setting section definitely needs source, especially claims like ``inspired by the real-life Amazon rainforest`` and ``tend to resemble real-life animals, but with bizarre flourishes`` * Is it really necessary to mention the game's setting in such in-depth way? , are not really useful. * Character list does not really seem to add any significant plot point and can be merged to the character section. * - ``leads`` * The overall plot section is a bit too long. I wonder if the part about 1932–1934: the Valembois expedition or the 1998: the journalist plays more significant role in the game's overall plot. You should omit the details of the less important one. * - Who is Luis Angel? * - Not an important plot point ===Gameplay=== * - not needed * Players and the player, choose one * - Rephrase it to but instead serve to flesh out the game's plot, such as the explorer's journal and Valembois's letter.`` * The first paragraph of the gameplay section is unsourced. ===Development=== * - Remove ``of`` * - began ``to`` work * - Does the source mention why? * I would name the subsection heading as ``Design`` instead of ``Pre-production``. More accurate this way. * Do not really understand what means * - unsourced * - Do not see the need of having a lengthy quote like this. had summed it up very nicely. * - Rephrase it to ``In 1997, Casterman suffered from financial troubles`` * - When? * - Do not need quotation marks here * - Who is ``them``? * - needs source to support * re-released or rereleased, choose one * - at what role he collaborated with them? adviser, consultant? * section is n	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,036,900	` == 4 November 2015 == Your edit to Matt Bevin claimed that the information provided was ``biased``. It's not ``biased`` to tell the blatant truth. Matt Bevin was criticized for lying about his position on health care – there's no pretty way to say it. If the statement is deleted, like you had done, then it's hiding the truth, or whitewashing. Whitewashing is dishonesty and deception, which is unbecoming of a civilized person. Also, the way you phrased, ``...to stop putting people on Obamacare`` sounds like a 10 year old wrote it – if you're going to edit articles, please use proper grammar (in other words, don't write the same way that Donald Trump talks). `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,069,450	` * OK, my mistake, so in that case, feel free to resubmit the AFC. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
689,089,911	` Why don't you guys just refer to the main Shadow Cabinet article? ``The Shadow Cabinet is a feature of the Westminster system of government. It comprises a senior group of opposition spokespeople who, under the leadership of the Leader of the Opposition, form an alternative cabinet to that of the government`` (emphasis added) `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
689,090,108	`. Trudeau wasn't the Leader of the Opposition, Mulcair was. Ergo the Liberals weren't the Opposition, the NDP was. Therefore the Liberals could not, by definition, form a ``shadow cabinet``.`	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
689,098,126	` :: Coincidentally, there was already a post here about this, but I've just edited all info on the CSI pages referring to Cyber taking place in Quantico. Krummy and Elijah explicitly stated that they were based out of Washington in ``Hack E.R.`` (Krumitz: 'I thought Avery grounded you' / Elijah: 'We all know Baltimore is just a suburb of the District'), before this there has been an onscreen reference to them being in Washington during every episode, as well as the Lincoln Memorial being featured in episode 1, and the Washington Monument in almost every episode. :: I'm just posting this here in case anyone is still adamant it's set in Quantico. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
689,110,787	` == Sangria == Curious as to why you think Blake Shelton's Sangria would be considered ``Bro.`` I doesn't sound explicitly Bro-country to me. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
689,128,912	`The growth of the article from the initial to expanded contribution is obvious – the article now provides a more complete historical picture of the issue and its nuances. Great work! I think the article is very readable, and to improve that facet even further, you could consider adding a graphic related to the topic. I mostly would like to see the inclusion of more citations within the article, especially in sections where there isn’t a single source cited (the entire History section, the ``Disease and Death`` subsection). Additionally, I would examine the language of the introductory paragraphs and consider rewording it. The two things that stick out to me in particular: :``Native Americans in the United States have historically had extreme difficulty with the use of alcohol.`` As the opening sentence, it seems like it could be presented with more neutrality. :``Use of alcohol varies by age, gender and tribe with women, and older women in particular, being least likely to be regular drinkers`` is worded strangely. (I mention these two things in particular because they are the first things a person will read on the page.) Let me know if you have any questions or how else I might be able to help you in the review process. Good luck! `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
689,135,961	== Administrators == Administrators are those who are responsible for the Majority of vandalism on Wikipedia. I have relinquished my position as an admin over a decade ago over abuses of the use, or rather the abuse of Wikipedia. All the original editors quit their position, leaving a void in which the little men who were put down by people like me became the new admins; these individuals did not know what they were contributing to, but rather were mindless incantations of the new generation.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,274,846	` == For you == {\| class=``barnstar`` style=``border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;`` \|- \|rowspan=``2`` style=``padding-right:5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;`` \| The Working Man's Barnstar \|- \|style=``border-top: 1px solid gray;`` \| Hello mate, this is for your work at Witnesses of the Armenian Genocide article. Keep up the good work. -) \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,283,514	==Edits at Chevrolet Big-Block engine== Could you explain or give a source for the recent edits you made to Chevrolet Big-Block engine?	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
689,286,139	: The concept is as old as forced lubrication systems, maybe even older. For as long as oil has been flowing down narrow pipes, they've had some sort of strainer. : The first are probably the capillary 'trimmings' (wicks) made of twisted wool, used on steam engines. These allow a slow flow of oil from an oil reservoir to flow into a bearing. They're small enough that they can be mounted individually on each joint of coupling rods. These locations are also likely to collect some dirt, so the filtering aspect is useful too. : The next development was the use of brass wire mesh strainers, again at first in total loss systems for steam engines. As it's a total loss system this isn't about straining collected bearing detritus from the oil, it's about removing dirt that gets in during filling. As it's total loss though, refilling is needed before each shift, so dirt ingress is a problem. : Some high-speed steam engines see the introduction of the sump or oil pan, thus permitting both splash lubrication or the first continuously pumped oil systems. These sumps collected as much condensed water as oil, so as well as the brass wire mesh there are also oil-water separators. : The first petrol engines are contemporaneous and have similar lubrication systems, largely by splash and only sometimes or partially by pump, for high stress areas. : Aircraft engines develop in WWI. These have a vast budget for materials, provided that performance and reliability are increased. We see much improved bearing materials, even silver alloys. Dry sump systems are used for in-line engines, as these are lighter than wet sumps as they need less oil to operate. There are also oil coolers. These high performance bearings rely on a reliable supply of clean oil through a hydrostatic bearing with very close tolerances. This is really the point when fine particle filtration becomes important and we see real filters, rather than just debris strainers. : Between the wars the Auto-Klean type of filter is important. This is a stack of fine steel disks and stars, with oil passing the gaps between them. They have a distinctive top handle which is turned a quarter turn every so often in use, scraping any debris into the centre. There are also centrifugal oil filtration systems built into crankshaft pulleys etc. (These lasted into the 1960s on at least one car, the Fiat 124 1438cc A series) : Around 1930 the high-speed diesel engine appears and starts to be used for trucks. This needs a fuel filter, as the injection system can't function without. It is this, not lubricating oil, that prompts the development of paper element filters with good flow rates. At first these are in steel bowls (glass for fuel), with a bare element. The element gains glued end discs, then an open-ended enclosing canister, then finally the familiar spin-on close-ended canister.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,301,574	`::I've added a picture of the logo. ) @Jbrulz123 `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,308,421	First: Both the Herald and the Times both published the identical piece (as literally 30 seconds of research would reveal). :::::::::::::: Second: There is no question whatsoever that the 'Herald and the Times are respected sources. All arguments to the contrary are strained at best. Also, reporters routinely report on non-public documents, including government documents, drafts, etc. That is absolutely typical, as a quick glance at any given day's Washington Post'' would reveal. Your approach seems would seemingly presume that reporters don't do fact-checking. The whole point of journalism is that professional editors act as a filter.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
689,337,794	Lingvisticae Investigationes: International Journal of Linguistics and Language Resources	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,339,518	:it is a mistake srry	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,347,163	== Deletion discussion about Walker and the Shade of Allanon == Hello, Maynarkj, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Walker and the Shade of Allanon should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walker and the Shade of Allanon . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks,	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
689,352,059	::of course thanks for the note	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,386,728	you cant delete it siece of shit fuck your mom	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
689,386,825	stupid sit i will behead you	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
689,388,062	` ::: This isn't about my view, this is about the Wikipedia manual of style, which states ``by default, write all articles in the present tense, including for those covering products or works that have been discontinued. Articles discussing works of fiction are also written in the present tense.`` The Verve is a work or product that has been discontinued, but it still exists, therefore it should be written in present tense. ::: The only way a band wouldn't exist is if it was never established. Once a band becomes a band, it remains a band, in wikipedia terms, permanently. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,391,198	dont belives her he is a fking liar politely explain on this talk page fluck you liar all this stupis shit did is delete all the pages i creted cuking shit trash dont belive her	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
689,399,706	` == Copyedit == Just a note: I have copyedited this article. / `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,418,446	:::::: I have to discuss it here, because I'm not understanding why you are siding with them, you clearly removed the way the article it was even though you didn't remove ANY HADITH, I'm baffled by your back stabbing. So what was wrong with the way the article was when I fixed it and THEN go to the talk page or do you have to side with the others, please bring forth your neutrality	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,425,384	:>The extent to which you stalk me across articles is a little bit creepy, particularly as WP:ABF You are tasting your own medicine now, how you feel, besides he is an administrator so show some respect. let him do his job. Are we as editors suppose not visit any articles you visit? >seems to be your standard approach to me Crying foul now? >You don't need to like me or my edits, that is mutual. WHAT? >I think your overall contribution to WP is negative and the project would be better off without you. That is what you think about everyone who is against you. >But when editing articles and talk pages, you would do well do stop misrepresenting other users, editing without bothering to take the time to read what others say, and always assuming bad faith. Another bunch of false accusation, the disrespect on you is amazing.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,428,343	Did Softlavender pulled the tooth of the lion? Incredible.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,429,449	:::::::: >Everything that is on Wikipedia article space has to be by consensus/policy.Dully noted>The hadith that you tried to remove is about a slave that was freed.No, the hadith I removed was about a wife that didn't give her uncle a gift in which Muhammad told her you can, it has no basis on manumission of slaves or not, Muhammad alredy encouraged manumission with the evidence I brought forth.>We have a consensus to retain that and to keep the section title neutral.I agree but saying manumission makes no sense, it is either encouraged or discouraged.>There's no reason to have any further discussion on any of this since the consensus is clear.I have yet to see a reason a VALID one why giving gifts to your uncle is constituted as manumission??? >You can continue to talk here all you want but I don't think anyone is going to reply further because it's just repetitious at this point, and that wastes everyone's time.It's waste everyone who doesn't know the hadith, this is simply a herd mentality, and as I have told you before the people who started the edit warring were people stalking me and following me. There is no way Wikipedia can't have tyranny of the majority, would a 1+1=3 need a consensus? Surely there can exist a consensus from editors who have knowledge in this area and not people who have a dog against me like Jeppiz and Tip.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
689,436,574	== Stop == Hey, I dislike your white-washing, I dislike your dishonesty, and I dislike your undoing of my edits, stalking me around like that. Stick to the Christian-propaganda project you're already engaged in, and bug off from me. Not only are you religiously-delusional, but you're also annoying.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
689,438,147	He died in siege to be specific.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
689,438,691	== Is there something personal. == Is there something personal you have against me to revive the old Ottoman Armenian picture?, I'm willing to go back to the article and have another round of discussion the image if this is your plan? The issue was resolved long ago	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,441,311	== Mention of Moor by Procopius of Caesarea == Why is you want to remove such old usage of the word moor that dates back to 500 A.D.??? Also stop with the false accsuation I'm assuming GOOD FAITH while you are assuming BAD FAITH, that is not good for the collaborative environment of Wikipedia, so let's discuss here	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
689,442,430	== Wikipedia:Assume_bad_faith == Stop assuming bad faith in my edits, thank you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,442,860	:: You see assuming good faith is nice. Now you are learning. Well Procopius of Caesarea doesn't deal with the etymology of the word, he merely mentions them as passage in the Vandelic Wars, maybe you can incorporate a grammatical correct word so we can properly cite his work here.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
689,444,868	:::: I moved it and modified it and provided a source, a secondary one for that matter.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,469,936	` == External links == first comment/question: this link—``List of Seth Sessions by Mary Dillman,`` and this link—``Index of Eleven Seth Books by Sue R. Williams,`` both go to the same webpagethe front page of a website put up by Mary Dillman that is Seth related. it doesn't link directly to any sort of list. next comment/question: the last 4 links are all for websites/pages for a ``Lynda Dahl.`` this surprised me, as i didn't remember seeing that name anywhere in the article. a search led me to ref/source #15, which is: ``ESP Power, by Jane Roberts (2000) (introductory essay by Lynda Dahl). ISBN 0-88391-016-0`` the relatively recent publication date caught my eye. i did a search for the book and found a ``Fells' Official Know-it-all Guide to ESP Power,`` first published in 1974, then in 1997, and then in 2000. ``How to Develop Your ESP Powers`` was published in 1966 by Pocket Books. (which means this item is incorrect in the ``Complete writings`` list, which lists the publisher as ``Federick Fell.`` i found it on AbeBooks, and the cover clearly shows ``Pocket Books.`` and, at any rate, i'm fairly certain it should at least be ``Frederick.``) at any rate, i could not find a single site that had this 2000 reprinted book available (store or library) that listed an introduction, let alone an introduction by a Lynda Dahl. nor was an introduction mentioned on those pages that had the original 1966 book available. which leads me to ask if this can be verified? if not, i question the inclusion of it in the ``References`` item. and, whether the introduction is verified or not, i question having 4 external links for a different person on an author's WP article. it starts to come across as self-promotion, so i bring it here for discussion. Note: the final link—``Seth/Jane Roberts Books and Info``—is to a Facebook page maintained by Linda Dahl. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,481,087	and have you got an email address or any means of communications so I can send them to you	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
689,488,523	` ==art forgery one sided edits great job == The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Barnstar of Diligence \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| I just had a chance to see what you've done to theart forgery one sided edits great job and wow is it one sided, thanks again very impressed. \|}`	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
689,489,224	==thisisfunny== Peppa Pig. A minute later, on the same day, you edited John Wayne. Just how does your mind work?	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
689,506,149	` ::that's why i prefer ``reportedly``, it avoids the issue of having to say ``according to so and so`` in the lead. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,510,895	` November 2015 (UTC) :::::::::::More interesting reading! You're taking almost as much of my editing time as all this WikiDrama with the Kevin Healey (autism activist) article (you're already aware of it and have declined to comment, so I don't think my mentioning it counts as canvassing). I can see some of 's , but ArbCom isn't going to be abolished immediately. It makes no sense to let worse candidates be the ones to sit on the committee than are available just because you think no ArbCom at all would be the best outcome; all that would mean is more grief for people who have to deal with ArbCom in the meantime. It's possible to work within the existing structure, and work to dismantle that structure, at the same time. — 17:37, 7`	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
689,542,712	` ::It's an expression of a personal opinion, which I hope is in line with WP's user page standards. I'd be happy to revert that edit if need be, it's just a user page after all. Thanks. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,550,605	REDIRECT Talk:Finding Neverland (film)	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
689,557,966	== Photos of Brenda tunnel boring machine == Closeup photos and video on Flickr licensed CC-by that we can import to Commons.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,564,341	== Clemson Tigers colors update == CAT, please add the link to the colors module talk page: . All changes and additions to the module must be verified by linked reference, so that other editors may easily verify all such changes. Adding to the linked references to the talk page is our temporary system until we create something more permanent, probably involving direct links within the module itself. Your cooperation and assistance are appreciated. Thanks.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
689,618,365	:::PS. Shouldnt the dead links for in the MAF article be removed?	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,625,174	== CVC & CVP compare == CVC: central venous catheter CVP: central venous pressure So need to insert CVC before CVP can be measured	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
689,626,733	== To Dawnseeker2000 == please explain the action of you revert Taiwan part If you keeping act rude without reason I see you in the Village pump	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,632,270	\|maindate= 22 November 2015	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
689,634,198	` :A large number of links does not prove primary topic. Both the musical & film could be considered primary topic at this point and as there are 4 articles with the same title a disambiguation page is clearly needed. U did not dispute the move, hence I carried out the proper process prior to disam. Frankly u have been nothing but antagonistic and provided no reasoning on my talk page why the move was controversial in any way. Other than making a point about I haven't edited the article before. Also removing the incoming links template is not helpful as the bot will re add it, on its next sweep. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,634,449	` ::Also looking at your user page it would appear there are potential Wp:Own issues here as well. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,643,126	` :In keeping with ``unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.`` WP:BLP, I corrected her results and removed the phrase regarding world records. Bestowing such a title to Mullins takes away from the real World Record breaker that year, Iryna Leantsiuk. http://www.paralympic.org/ipc_results/results2pdf.php?sport=athletics&competition;=1996PG&gender;=f&discipline;=&event;=Long+Jump&eclass;=F42-46 I left the part of the phrase regarding her retiring in 1998 since I could not refute it (although it perhaps should be sourced ala citation needed?) `	2,015	false	article	random	test	false
689,686,113	::For the all bullying you have done on Wikipedia, did you expect Karma not to come back?	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
689,686,444	:Why am I being censored MONGO? Sitush - answer man...For all the bullying you have done on Wikipedia, did you not expect Karma to return?	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
689,691,935	` ===Response to AN/I=== The edit in question is a reference to an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia I was watching at the time. I get that it's probably not the best use of a user page, but I honestly don't really care that much about what's on my user page; I'm here to edit the wiki. I can also acknowledge that saying ``real girls have vaginas`` could be seen as hurtful or intimidating to other users, which is in no way my intent. I don't have any issues changing my user page if it means moving on from all this debate and getting back to editing. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,702,346	*Note: I have asked for input at Wikiproject Chemistry. I'd be grateful if this edit request could remain open until we've had some feedback from someone there.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
689,702,624	== A page you started (G. Peignot et Fils) has been reviewed! == Thanks for creating G. Peignot et Fils, Pascalfroissart! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: This is an English language article, so even though it is a Frenchman speaking, don't use guillemets. To reply, leave a comment on De la Marck's . Learn more about page curation.	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
689,706,994	@ Because I read online that Pixar was credited for doing some work on this game! The credits of the game said so to on this website (https://www.chronocompendium.com/Term/Chrono_Cross_Credits.html) and IMDb said this too. If any Wikipedia user has the game they need to see if this true. I got it from websites like IMDb and Chrono Compendium that said PIXAR did some work on it.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,709,577	:: >It is difficult to assume good faith when you constantly make patronizing remarks, insults, and accusations.It's also equality difficult when people lie to me and accuse me of wrongdoings and stalk me and try to , I will be the better man and forgive you for all your wrongdoings at me.>I have not seen a single interaction that you have engaged in that did not include this sort of disruptive behavior.Again please stop accusing me and stop spreading misinformation, just because you never saw Chinese person doesn't mean Chinese person doesn't exist. It;s not my fault that you are to eager to spread misinformation about me.>You ask if this is something personal to meYes I ask if there is a personal issue you have me that you want to deal with it in your talk page as I came here to inquire about it. You are ready to bring up past incidents and fuel the fire. These behavior reminded me of middle school students or people who hod grudge for long.>yet at least a dozen editors complain about your behavior at the discussions above.Again you are using an Argumentum ad populum which is a fallacy.>That should tell you something.It tells me nothing or did you expect me to roll down and worship you?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,711,999	` ::::::::: >``Manumission encouraged`` is a pov title. ``Manumission`` alone is not.Manumission encouraged is an NPOV title, I love the fact that when I brought balance in the article you get angry and revert and change but when the article had the ``Manumission discouraged`` you never said anything. Shows you exactly how biased you are and selective you are. TWO WHOLE CHAPTERS in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim dedicated to encouraging Muslims to manumit their slaves.>``Manumission`` accurately indicates that slave freeing was possible under Islamic lawIt's not only possible, it is encouraged. That is why it is suppose to be there>but ``Manumission encouraged`` suggest that there was disproval of slavery under Islamic law and customs.This is again is false, I never said anything about approval or disapproval, we are looking at Muhammad's dealing with the slaves. The institution for slavery existed but with rules and guidelines to follow, and the freeding of slaves is encouraged in both the hadith and the Quran>In reality enslavement was normal behavior, and arguably a vital reason for the success of early Islam.This is laughable at best, the early success of Islam has more to do with the battles, the people, and their religion.>There was no slavery under early Christianity when it stood alone and unchallenged.I'm sure that Jesus was put on the cross and embarrassed by the Romans, not sure on what legal precident he had to challenge the Empire, which survived upto Muhammad's time and were still dealing with slaves>Islam by its creation created an ``other``What other?>While this article is not about that, not about slavery and IslamYes I realize that>it is about things reportedly said by Muhammad concerning slaveryThat is why I'm objected and trying to remove a hadith dealing with ways a wife can give a gift to her uncle., giving gifts to memebrs of your family after giving them to the needy is mentioned in the hadith sources which is backed up by this hadith, upon investigating the commentary of Bukhari in Fath al-Bari>or what later commentators have said about itWhat they said is important to understand what exactly was happening. And it forms as an evidence that this hadith has no place in this article.>so any appropriate sayings/hadiths that mention manumission have a right to be included in the Manumission section.The hadith doesn't deal with manumission it deals with the giving of gifts. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
689,712,774	::: I agree we should wait for citations.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
689,713,270	*Support The same thing should happen to the Huns, and Safavid article, the people/dynasty should be separate from the Empire. As the person a who is supporting above me says they are different subject	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,713,616	== Hey please stop VANDALIZING == stop it	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,714,498	== The flag? == How fictitious is the flag, you removed in the Sanjak of Bosnia article	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
689,715,908	`:: Hi Iryna, it's a lovely day right?>I had a feeling that we might cross paths again over this new user.This is Wikipedia and we share a common Cossack interest.>It appears that he's systematically working through historical articles and giving them a slanted Ottoman Empire spin.Iryna, please stop lying about me, how can I make Ali article and give it ``a slanted Ottoman Empire spin``? how can I make Mughal article and give it ``a slanted Ottoman Empire spin``? How can I make thousands of article and give them ``a slanted Ottoman Empire spin`` ?????? I thought we setteled this issue already, you gave me advice and instruction from the guidelines but as usual I gave you my hand and you throw dirt at me?>I had to postpone discussions regarding the unbalanced structure of the article in question as I had my hands full in other sanctions areas.And as usual I will be there providing my references. How can you make a balances article more balances? Let me guess by adding more biased content, Iryna, please wake up and let's have a serious discussion, leave the insults at home., with your logic if I read about the Mongol Empire and edit the Kiev page on the date of the battles they lost, I must be giving ``a slanted Mongol Empire spin``, anyone who isn't pro-Ukranian must be against you, I don't abide by these false dichotomy claims you write about me. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
689,716,452	` :can live with the current version or use of ``reportedly`` (which does not, as suggested above, have negative connotations; in common English usage it means ``according to what has been said`` or quiet literally ``it has been reported,`` don't get the issue with this). Placing emphasis on non-notable reporters in the lead is not the way to go. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,717,415	::::: No offense taken, I would say anytime you want.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,726,294	` ===Response to AN/I=== The edit in question is a reference to an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia I was watching at the time. I get that it's probably not the best use of a user page, but I honestly don't really care that much about what's on my user page; I'm here to edit the wiki. I can also acknowledge that saying ``real girls have vaginas`` could be seen as hurtful or intimidating to other users, which is in no way my intent. I don't have any issues changing my user page if it means moving on from all this debate and getting back to editing. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,726,491	` ::I'm using it only in context to the situation in which it is relevant. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,762,659	` == Proof on me not being ``virtual newbie`` == I hope we can settle this rumor created by Who was quick to tarnish my image and accuse of sock puppetry. I made this just for you, in your own talk page, so you don't fall for what I call misinformation, here is my narutopedia [ushttp://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/User:ZabuzaTheDemon user page] and notice my new edit and your name, also you can check the history of the page here, it is almost a year since I edited my Narutopedia user page, also here is my contributions page. So in conclusion: # I'm not ``virtual newbie`` # I have previous simple knowledge of editing, my knwoeldge increased exponentily in Wikipedia mother of all Wikis # fun fact: I was just using the Virutal editor in Narutopedia, it wasn't a rocket Science in the sens all I did was add word here and there and never had to edit the source manually ever except in Wikipedia. Hopefully you will reach a positive conclusion and abandon this rumor or you can continue spreading misinformation about me with , your choice `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,766,598	and wouldn't have wanted to learn about any other online community to start with.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
689,800,424	` by the way if you have son or daughter, you can say the same thing with them `` hey son(daughter) you English are so bad you should learn Chinese`` by the way I grateful for your contributions too ) cheer `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,804,121	:It seems this should be asked at Talk:Coño.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
689,805,875	== Age of Ultron == IMDb classification doesn't mean a shit. I've provided a source and imdb is not a reliable source because it is user-generated content. Read more about wikipedia, if I have a source that says Schindler's List is a comedy film, I can use it to list the film as so, as IMDb is concrned with verifiability and not truth.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,827,505	` :::::::::the sources are out of date, the figures are speculative estimates at best, furthermore, the latest headline i can find about the ``world's biggest star,`` in August 2015, claims it's Bradley Cooper! any such claim, about any individual, is, if you will excuse my French, bullshit. We should NOT be endorsing any such claim as FACT! Reportedly is what it is, these are entertainment news reports, it's BS news, utter crap, bottom of the barrel celebrity muck, it is NOT real journalism. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,832,309	REDIRECT Talk:The Gold Diggers (1919 play)	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
689,833,709	` :::::::::::seriously, wtf has Cruise got to do with any of this?? That's not even an FA, not even GA! Let me reiterate, I came to this FA via the Wiki cover page, as I'm sure did many, we should not have this kind of BS in the lead, not sure why people have difficulty understanding why it's problematic: its an FA, it's a BLP, therefore ropey claims, serve no place here without stating exactly the nature of the ropey claims (celebrity news reports). I'm getting the impression objectivity is lost here because it's essentially a fan page we are dealing with. Any edits that are perceived, erroneously, to be an attempt to undermine his aura of omnipotence is is taken as a personal attack. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,847,393	` == November 2015 == Hello, Callmemirela! It is nice to meet you. Your help in improving the page for Criminal Minds (season 11), specifically the episode section, is much appreciated!I'm glad you kept me on my toes about putting the episode summary in my own words, so as not to violate any copyright laws; for that I'm quite grateful to you. Criminal Minds is, by far, my favorite show and I love to help keep fellow fans informed. However, in my entire time editing Criminal Minds pages - which has been a little while; while I am fairly new to Wikipedia, this account was created with the (2) at the end because my previous account of the same name was inaccessible because I forgot my password lol - I have not once, by any editor, been asked/required to provide refernces for the production codes. Title, writer, director, and air date absolutely require references! But the production code is usually confirmed in one of the references whether it be title, writer, director, air date or any combination therein, added to the fact that the air dates can help determine the order in which the episodes will air, they are almost always confirmed. Although, I have come to understand there can be an exception in which the production codes can serve quite useful! This is when episodes air out of order, an example of which would be in Season 10, 1006, ``Boxed In``, was aired before 1005, ``If the Shoe Fits``, because ``Boxed In`` was the Halloween episode and it was scheduled to air on 11/05 whereas ``If the Shoe Fits`` was scheduled to air on 10/29; to resolve this, they merely switched their air dates, however, the production codes remained the same, therefore letting people know that they were aired out of order to accommodate Halloween. In that case, I believe it was briefly required to include references with the production codes. That, however, was the only time I've ever been required to provide a reference for a production code. I've posted references for all of the upcoming production codes to satisfy your need for me to do so and prove to you that I would not post those codes without knowing that their validity can eventually be found through other references. In conclusion, I absolutely agree with you that I needed to avoid violating copyright by denoting the summaries in a vernacular (lexicon; vocabulary; my own words) more unique to me, basically, to make them be more so in my own words, but I don't agree that the production codes need referencing. You are the first person who has ever asked me to do so. I do want you to know, though, that I always use reliable references for my episode title, writer, director and/or air date contributions, and that I take copyright violation (avoiding it!) very seriously! I really appreciate your willingness to help make the page as accurate as possible; that is my objective as well. I just don't think that it is necessary to reference the production codes, since all episodes have aired in order, thus far, and we (the fans) have been given no reason to believe they won't continue to do so. When it is required due to scheduling changes, I'd be happy to post it. I hope we can resolve this minor misunderstanding. Happy editing! Bef3481(2) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
689,852,848	::::::::: That is why some of us are here and thanks to KansasBear, we can have a civil disucssion and ensure the quality of the article.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
689,855,377	:* , sock puppet (?)	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
689,882,887	:Her first stint was 63 episodes as Jen Handley broadcast during 1995-96 (I've changed it to mid-1990s in the lead), her second stint was two episodes in 2012 as Olivia Bell (see here).	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,897,823	== What if Halloween 6 had an 138 minute version? == Ahould it be a good idea to mix Producer's Cut into Workprint Version?	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
689,902,860	:It seems fine.	2,015	false	user	random	train	false
689,908,580	== November 2015 == Well there, 75.80.125.107, have it your way. I find your sudden interest in removing my contribution humorous, as I know it is valid or else I would not have put it in the summary; believe it or not I have better things to do than to insist on posting untrue statements on Wikipedia. It was born (in my own words) from statements, which can be found on various websites, made by Erica Messer, the person who happens to be the Showrunner for Criminal Minds. It's no big deal, though; I understand why you took it down and I can always update it after the episode airs. Just thought I'd share that. Please know that I do not intend for this message to be malicious. Thanks for contributing! May peace be with you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
689,909,966	== economists are bad mathematicians == economists can only add, multiply, take logarithms, and (sometimes, very rarely) , indeed they obtain such stupid equations, meaning nothing except that their model (comparable to the worst climatics models) is meaning-less.	2,015	false	article	random	dev	false
689,915,166	== Racial controversy and resignation == This section is very good and does not hold back. I vote we keep it as-is until further developments.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
689,941,637	I didn't change it hence this BS claim of me saying i that I keep adding it when in fact i just haven't changed it is not the same thing...if i make n edit and i just forget to leave something on there or don't change it because i was focusing on other edits don't mean I KEEP DOING IT...big difference and to be frankly this is getting a little childish GROW UP...to be honest you're pissing me off now i'm trying to be nice but you keep doing this to harass.....i don't have time for your other people's nagging and BS ok? some of you are worse than little girls grow a pair and stop harassing users and i could be a lot more blunt and harsh...i'm not doing nothing wrong i dont vandalize when i contributed quite alot here and been using wikipedia for a long time ...i don't make up facts and just because i haven't got the time to reference some of them especially since i pretty much had to learn everything in editing here from other users on my own so stop harassing me for petty BS that's irrelevant..all you and your simple minded brethren should worry about is about people who purposely put fake info or make it up...the edits i put i get them from sources but it's not so simple to cite or source very single edit i ever done in hereso for the last time..stop harassing people for petty nonsense you're acting like children...most things i edit are in fact correct and btw i do a lot more research to finding out this stuff than most of you because apparently i can actually complete and be specific about facts that most would want to know...i don't do half-assed edits so stop harassing users who actually CONTRIBUTE for the betterment of this and stop envying others who are more capable and more determined than some of you are..just because some of you didn't come up with it doesn't mean you gotta give them trouble or envy them or even worse claim their effort and work and pawn it as your own...there;s's a difference between influencing others and taking credit for others people's work and effort...i seen edits i made that were never there before i put them and influenced others that noticed my efforts and kept them because it was more detailed and specific..the more specific the better in my opinion so cut this shit out already worry about people who purposely try to troll or put fake info etc etc..because that's not me ok? why would i want to sabotage a website that i relied on for looking at information for years? this is a website where we all contribute ...YOUR WAY as lazy and half-assed as it might be in some articles doesn't mean its the only way to edit..some of us put more effort and try to be as detailed as possible...stop it already...some of you are getting pretty annoying ...i come here to look up things and to edit to make some articles better and more fleshed out...none of you do it so someone has to finish the half -assed article i seen around...i hope i made myself clear this time..go bother others who are ACTUALLY messing up the articles purposely because i sure as hell am not one of those people...and don't worry i'll show the sources i get my info from since some of you are too damn lazy to look it up...get it? got it ? good pffftt...the nerve of some of you...how immature..envying others because you couldn't come up with it or put that effort yourselves...now that's childish...grow up we're suppose to help one another and inspire the other to do better..it's not my fault some of the articles here are incomplete with empty info boxes etc etc..blame yourselves for that..i..unlike some of you, believe in making articles as complete and detailed and specific as possible..	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
689,944,016	:In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact Synetrix Holdings Limited (UK) to report abuse.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
689,965,587	` :re:unsigned links provided above, what they actually say. :1) ``...one of the world’s biggest movie stars.`` :2) ``...is probably the biggest film star in the world.`` :3) ``...one of the biggest actors in the world…one of the richest actors in the world...and only comes second to American comedian Jerry Seinfeld on the list of top earning actors.`` :4) ``...His personal earnings were estimated to be 26 million dollars by Forbes in 2015 and it ranked him as the world's 18th most highly paid actor.`` :5) ``SRK is known to be not the nation’s biggest star but the world’s biggest movie star.`` :6) this link is a reprint of item 4. :*7) ``Khan, who is hailed as the world's biggest superstar.`` :again, nothing definitive here. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
689,973,934	Sorry BJ, while it is true that there have been attempts to refute my propositions, none have been successful. Also it is undoubtedly true that the cold fusion community has attempted to ignore my comments, using strawmen arguments and ad hominem attacks to justify their actions. But we all know those aren't valid reasons to ignore technical criticisms. So the net result is that the field continues to exist on supposition and blind faith. To date, I haven't seen any conclusive evidence from the field.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
689,999,195	== Gay sexual practices == Please, read the talk page to the entry. There's a consensus among all editors who have weighed in on the subject that the 'health risks' subsections need to be trimmed down to respect Wikipedia's Undue weight policies. All I did was that, besides adding content and sources to the main subsection, which you removed.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
690,003,491	:: Glad we cleared that up!	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
690,073,937	What an amazing coincidence!!! It is an extraordinary coincidence that someone living in Keller, Texas ~ the same place where Bishop Ackerman lives ~ has chosen to vandalise my user page. What are the odds of this? Absolutely amazing!	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
690,077,864	{{subst:arbcom notice\|Military Occupation of Gaza}}.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
690,077,947	! Template:Arbcom notice	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false

688,977,263

the board members are for PRG... just called info centre as per ASX site

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

688,979,895

Please update board to PRG as per ASX site.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

688,985,511

http://www.smh.com.au/business/skilled-group-ceo-angus-mckay-steps-down-as-mining-downturn-bites-20150804-girike.html it is a correct edit ASX site is uptodate.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,002,898

== What happen to you? == It takes hard effort to contribute here.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

689,011,364

` *Strong Oppose precisely for the reason that ``bullying and suicide`` are apples and oranges as you have stated so clearly. Bullying is by no means the sole precursor to suicide, and suicide is not the inevitable result of bulling. You state that it is a neologism. In 2001 it was. Many years have passed since then and the term is in common parlance. It is, indeed, the common name of suicide the is a direct result of bullying. The inherent ambiguity is addressed in the article itself, or was in an earlier version. That clarification of the ambiguity needs to return if it has been removed. Bullycide the term became a noted phenomenon. The word crossed the lips of the US president. I feel strongly that more than a redirect is required. It is the term that is important. :When you state that it was uncontroversially moved you are in error. It was simply not noticed until you had done the deed. When I noticed it I moved it back. The irony is that you took a long time to notice that before starting this conversation. You are simply expressing WP:IDONTLIKEIT with the current and correct title. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,034,299

` * The coverage must be in a place that Wikipedia would consider reliable. Like I said on the draft, most hackers and web personalities will not gain coverage in places Wikipedia would consider reliable - especially since most will not want this type of coverage and will want to keep themselves as private as possible, as is the case here. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

689,034,609

` ===Infobox/Lead=== * Anuman Interactive is a port developer and should not be listed * Remove unlinkable engine per Template:video game reviews * Some citations in the release fields seem to be in the wrong place. You can actually remove them per WP:LEADCITE * June 6–7, 2011? Why it has two release dates? * - Infobox calls Microïds is the game's developer instead of publisher * Development information is too light in the game's lead. I suggest to add a new paragraph summarizing the game's development and move to it * Plot was covered too much in the lead. can be cut. * Gameplay information is needed for the lead * - ``a`` positive reception, or generally positive ``reviews`` * - don't know what ``it`` is. visuals? * - remove ``great``, change ``in its original release`` to ``since its original release``. When exactly did the game reach this sales figure? ===Plot=== * The setting section definitely needs source, especially claims like ``inspired by the real-life Amazon rainforest`` and ``tend to resemble real-life animals, but with bizarre flourishes`` * Is it really necessary to mention the game's setting in such in-depth way? , are not really useful. * Character list does not really seem to add any significant plot point and can be merged to the character section. * - ``leads`` * The overall plot section is a bit too long. I wonder if the part about 1932–1934: the Valembois expedition or the 1998: the journalist plays more significant role in the game's overall plot. You should omit the details of the less important one. * - Who is Luis Angel? * - Not an important plot point ===Gameplay=== * - not needed * Players and the player, choose one * - Rephrase it to but instead serve to flesh out the game's plot, such as the explorer's journal and Valembois's letter.`` * The first paragraph of the gameplay section is unsourced. ===Development=== * - Remove ``of`` * - began ``to`` work * - Does the source mention why? * I would name the subsection heading as ``Design`` instead of ``Pre-production``. More accurate this way. * Do not really understand what means * - unsourced * - Do not see the need of having a lengthy quote like this. had summed it up very nicely. * - Rephrase it to ``In 1997, Casterman suffered from financial troubles`` * - When? * - Do not need quotation marks here * - Who is ``them``? * - needs source to support * re-released or rereleased, choose one * - at what role he collaborated with them? adviser, consultant? * section is n

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,036,900

` == 4 November 2015 == Your edit to Matt Bevin claimed that the information provided was ``biased``. It's not ``biased`` to tell the blatant truth. Matt Bevin was criticized for lying about his position on health care – there's no pretty way to say it. If the statement is deleted, like you had done, then it's hiding the truth, or whitewashing. Whitewashing is dishonesty and deception, which is unbecoming of a civilized person. Also, the way you phrased, ``...to stop putting people on Obamacare`` sounds like a 10 year old wrote it – if you're going to edit articles, please use proper grammar (in other words, don't write the same way that Donald Trump talks). `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,069,450

` * OK, my mistake, so in that case, feel free to resubmit the AFC. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

689,089,911

` Why don't you guys just refer to the main Shadow Cabinet article? ``The Shadow Cabinet is a feature of the Westminster system of government. It comprises a senior group of opposition spokespeople who, under the leadership of the Leader of the Opposition, form an alternative cabinet to that of the government`` (emphasis added) `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

689,090,108

`. Trudeau wasn't the Leader of the Opposition, Mulcair was. Ergo the Liberals weren't the Opposition, the NDP was. Therefore the Liberals could not, by definition, form a ``shadow cabinet``.`

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

689,098,126

` :: Coincidentally, there was already a post here about this, but I've just edited all info on the CSI pages referring to Cyber taking place in Quantico. Krummy and Elijah explicitly stated that they were based out of Washington in ``Hack E.R.`` (Krumitz: 'I thought Avery grounded you' / Elijah: 'We all know Baltimore is just a suburb of the District'), before this there has been an onscreen reference to them being in Washington during every episode, as well as the Lincoln Memorial being featured in episode 1, and the Washington Monument in almost every episode. :: I'm just posting this here in case anyone is still adamant it's set in Quantico. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

689,110,787

` == Sangria == Curious as to why you think Blake Shelton's Sangria would be considered ``Bro.`` I doesn't sound explicitly Bro-country to me. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

689,128,912

`The growth of the article from the initial to expanded contribution is obvious – the article now provides a more complete historical picture of the issue and its nuances. Great work! I think the article is very readable, and to improve that facet even further, you could consider adding a graphic related to the topic. I mostly would like to see the inclusion of more citations within the article, especially in sections where there isn’t a single source cited (the entire History section, the ``Disease and Death`` subsection). Additionally, I would examine the language of the introductory paragraphs and consider rewording it. The two things that stick out to me in particular: :``Native Americans in the United States have historically had extreme difficulty with the use of alcohol.`` As the opening sentence, it seems like it could be presented with more neutrality. :``Use of alcohol varies by age, gender and tribe with women, and older women in particular, being least likely to be regular drinkers`` is worded strangely. (I mention these two things in particular because they are the first things a person will read on the page.) Let me know if you have any questions or how else I might be able to help you in the review process. Good luck! `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

689,135,961

== Administrators == Administrators are those who are responsible for the Majority of vandalism on Wikipedia. I have relinquished my position as an admin over a decade ago over abuses of the use, or rather the abuse of Wikipedia. All the original editors quit their position, leaving a void in which the little men who were put down by people like me became the new admins; these individuals did not know what they were contributing to, but rather were mindless incantations of the new generation.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,274,846

` == For you == {| class=``barnstar`` style=``border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;`` |- |rowspan=``2`` style=``padding-right:5px;`` | |style=``font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;`` | The Working Man's Barnstar |- |style=``border-top: 1px solid gray;`` | Hello mate, this is for your work at Witnesses of the Armenian Genocide article. Keep up the good work. -) |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,283,514

==Edits at Chevrolet Big-Block engine== Could you explain or give a source for the recent edits you made to Chevrolet Big-Block engine?

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

689,286,139

: The concept is as old as forced lubrication systems, maybe even older. For as long as oil has been flowing down narrow pipes, they've had some sort of strainer. : The first are probably the capillary 'trimmings' (wicks) made of twisted wool, used on steam engines. These allow a slow flow of oil from an oil reservoir to flow into a bearing. They're small enough that they can be mounted individually on each joint of coupling rods. These locations are also likely to collect some dirt, so the filtering aspect is useful too. : The next development was the use of brass wire mesh strainers, again at first in total loss systems for steam engines. As it's a total loss system this isn't about straining collected bearing detritus from the oil, it's about removing dirt that gets in during filling. As it's total loss though, refilling is needed before each shift, so dirt ingress is a problem. : Some high-speed steam engines see the introduction of the sump or oil pan, thus permitting both splash lubrication or the first continuously pumped oil systems. These sumps collected as much condensed water as oil, so as well as the brass wire mesh there are also oil-water separators. : The first petrol engines are contemporaneous and have similar lubrication systems, largely by splash and only sometimes or partially by pump, for high stress areas. : Aircraft engines develop in WWI. These have a vast budget for materials, provided that performance and reliability are increased. We see much improved bearing materials, even silver alloys. Dry sump systems are used for in-line engines, as these are lighter than wet sumps as they need less oil to operate. There are also oil coolers. These high performance bearings rely on a reliable supply of clean oil through a hydrostatic bearing with very close tolerances. This is really the point when fine particle filtration becomes important and we see real filters, rather than just debris strainers. : Between the wars the Auto-Klean type of filter is important. This is a stack of fine steel disks and stars, with oil passing the gaps between them. They have a distinctive top handle which is turned a quarter turn every so often in use, scraping any debris into the centre. There are also centrifugal oil filtration systems built into crankshaft pulleys etc. (These lasted into the 1960s on at least one car, the Fiat 124 1438cc A series) : Around 1930 the high-speed diesel engine appears and starts to be used for trucks. This needs a fuel filter, as the injection system can't function without. It is this, not lubricating oil, that prompts the development of paper element filters with good flow rates. At first these are in steel bowls (glass for fuel), with a bare element. The element gains glued end discs, then an open-ended enclosing canister, then finally the familiar spin-on close-ended canister.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,301,574

`::I've added a picture of the logo. ) @Jbrulz123 `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,308,421

First: Both the Herald and the Times both published the identical piece (as literally 30 seconds of research would reveal). :::::::::::::: Second: There is no question whatsoever that the 'Herald and the Times are respected sources. All arguments to the contrary are strained at best. Also, reporters routinely report on non-public documents, including government documents, drafts, etc. That is absolutely typical, as a quick glance at any given day's Washington Post'' would reveal. Your approach seems would seemingly presume that reporters don't do fact-checking. The whole point of journalism is that professional editors act as a filter.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

689,337,794

Lingvisticae Investigationes: International Journal of Linguistics and Language Resources

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,339,518

:it is a mistake srry

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,347,163

== Deletion discussion about Walker and the Shade of Allanon == Hello, Maynarkj, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Walker and the Shade of Allanon should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walker and the Shade of Allanon . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks,

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

689,352,059

::of course thanks for the note

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,386,728

you cant delete it siece of shit fuck your mom

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

689,386,825

stupid sit i will behead you

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

689,388,062

` ::: This isn't about my view, this is about the Wikipedia manual of style, which states ``by default, write all articles in the present tense, including for those covering products or works that have been discontinued. Articles discussing works of fiction are also written in the present tense.`` The Verve is a work or product that has been discontinued, but it still exists, therefore it should be written in present tense. ::: The only way a band wouldn't exist is if it was never established. Once a band becomes a band, it remains a band, in wikipedia terms, permanently. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,391,198

dont belives her he is a fking liar politely explain on this talk page fluck you liar all this stupis shit did is delete all the pages i creted cuking shit trash dont belive her

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

689,399,706

` == Copyedit == Just a note: I have copyedited this article. / `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,418,446

:::::: I have to discuss it here, because I'm not understanding why you are siding with them, you clearly removed the way the article it was even though you didn't remove ANY HADITH, I'm baffled by your back stabbing. So what was wrong with the way the article was when I fixed it and THEN go to the talk page or do you have to side with the others, please bring forth your neutrality

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,425,384

:>The extent to which you stalk me across articles is a little bit creepy, particularly as WP:ABF You are tasting your own medicine now, how you feel, besides he is an administrator so show some respect. let him do his job. Are we as editors suppose not visit any articles you visit? >seems to be your standard approach to me Crying foul now? >You don't need to like me or my edits, that is mutual. WHAT? >I think your overall contribution to WP is negative and the project would be better off without you. That is what you think about everyone who is against you. >But when editing articles and talk pages, you would do well do stop misrepresenting other users, editing without bothering to take the time to read what others say, and always assuming bad faith. Another bunch of false accusation, the disrespect on you is amazing.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,428,343

Did Softlavender pulled the tooth of the lion? Incredible.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,429,449

:::::::: >Everything that is on Wikipedia article space has to be by consensus/policy.Dully noted>The hadith that you tried to remove is about a slave that was freed.No, the hadith I removed was about a wife that didn't give her uncle a gift in which Muhammad told her you can, it has no basis on manumission of slaves or not, Muhammad alredy encouraged manumission with the evidence I brought forth.>We have a consensus to retain that and to keep the section title neutral.I agree but saying manumission makes no sense, it is either encouraged or discouraged.>There's no reason to have any further discussion on any of this since the consensus is clear.I have yet to see a reason a VALID one why giving gifts to your uncle is constituted as manumission??? >You can continue to talk here all you want but I don't think anyone is going to reply further because it's just repetitious at this point, and that wastes everyone's time.It's waste everyone who doesn't know the hadith, this is simply a herd mentality, and as I have told you before the people who started the edit warring were people stalking me and following me. There is no way Wikipedia can't have tyranny of the majority, would a 1+1=3 need a consensus? Surely there can exist a consensus from editors who have knowledge in this area and not people who have a dog against me like Jeppiz and Tip.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

689,436,574

== Stop == Hey, I dislike your white-washing, I dislike your dishonesty, and I dislike your undoing of my edits, stalking me around like that. Stick to the Christian-propaganda project you're already engaged in, and bug off from me. Not only are you religiously-delusional, but you're also annoying.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

689,438,147

He died in siege to be specific.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

689,438,691

== Is there something personal. == Is there something personal you have against me to revive the old Ottoman Armenian picture?, I'm willing to go back to the article and have another round of discussion the image if this is your plan? The issue was resolved long ago

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,441,311

== Mention of Moor by Procopius of Caesarea == Why is you want to remove such old usage of the word moor that dates back to 500 A.D.??? Also stop with the false accsuation I'm assuming GOOD FAITH while you are assuming BAD FAITH, that is not good for the collaborative environment of Wikipedia, so let's discuss here

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

689,442,430

== Wikipedia:Assume_bad_faith == Stop assuming bad faith in my edits, thank you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,442,860

:: You see assuming good faith is nice. Now you are learning. Well Procopius of Caesarea doesn't deal with the etymology of the word, he merely mentions them as passage in the Vandelic Wars, maybe you can incorporate a grammatical correct word so we can properly cite his work here.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

689,444,868

:::: I moved it and modified it and provided a source, a secondary one for that matter.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,469,936

` == External links == first comment/question: this link—``List of Seth Sessions by Mary Dillman,`` and this link—``Index of Eleven Seth Books by Sue R. Williams,`` both go to the same webpagethe front page of a website put up by Mary Dillman that is Seth related. it doesn't link directly to any sort of list. next comment/question: the last 4 links are all for websites/pages for a ``Lynda Dahl.`` this surprised me, as i didn't remember seeing that name anywhere in the article. a search led me to ref/source #15, which is: ``ESP Power, by Jane Roberts (2000) (introductory essay by Lynda Dahl). ISBN 0-88391-016-0`` the relatively recent publication date caught my eye. i did a search for the book and found a ``Fells' Official Know-it-all Guide to ESP Power,`` first published in 1974, then in 1997, and then in 2000. ``How to Develop Your ESP Powers`` was published in 1966 by Pocket Books. (which means this item is incorrect in the ``Complete writings`` list, which lists the publisher as ``Federick Fell.`` i found it on AbeBooks, and the cover clearly shows ``Pocket Books.`` and, at any rate, i'm fairly certain it should at least be ``Frederick.``) at any rate, i could not find a single site that had this 2000 reprinted book available (store or library) that listed an introduction, let alone an introduction by a Lynda Dahl. nor was an introduction mentioned on those pages that had the original 1966 book available. which leads me to ask if this can be verified? if not, i question the inclusion of it in the ``References`` item. and, whether the introduction is verified or not, i question having 4 external links for a different person on an author's WP article. it starts to come across as self-promotion, so i bring it here for discussion. Note: the final link—``Seth/Jane Roberts Books and Info``—is to a Facebook page maintained by Linda Dahl. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,481,087

and have you got an email address or any means of communications so I can send them to you

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

689,488,523

` ==art forgery one sided edits great job == The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Barnstar of Diligence |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | I just had a chance to see what you've done to theart forgery one sided edits great job and wow is it one sided, thanks again very impressed. |}`

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

689,489,224

==thisisfunny== Peppa Pig. A minute later, on the same day, you edited John Wayne. Just how does your mind work?

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

689,506,149

` ::that's why i prefer ``reportedly``, it avoids the issue of having to say ``according to so and so`` in the lead. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,510,895

` November 2015 (UTC) :::::::::::More interesting reading! You're taking almost as much of my editing time as all this WikiDrama with the Kevin Healey (autism activist) article (you're already aware of it and have declined to comment, so I don't think my mentioning it counts as canvassing). I can see some of 's , but ArbCom isn't going to be abolished immediately. It makes no sense to let worse candidates be the ones to sit on the committee than are available just because you think no ArbCom at all would be the best outcome; all that would mean is more grief for people who have to deal with ArbCom in the meantime. It's possible to work within the existing structure, and work to dismantle that structure, at the same time. — 17:37, 7`

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

689,542,712

` ::It's an expression of a personal opinion, which I hope is in line with WP's user page standards. I'd be happy to revert that edit if need be, it's just a user page after all. Thanks. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,550,605

REDIRECT Talk:Finding Neverland (film)

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

689,557,966

== Photos of Brenda tunnel boring machine == Closeup photos and video on Flickr licensed CC-by that we can import to Commons.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,564,341

== Clemson Tigers colors update == CAT, please add the link to the colors module talk page: . All changes and additions to the module must be verified by linked reference, so that other editors may easily verify all such changes. Adding to the linked references to the talk page is our temporary system until we create something more permanent, probably involving direct links within the module itself. Your cooperation and assistance are appreciated. Thanks.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

689,618,365

:::PS. Shouldnt the dead links for in the MAF article be removed?

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,625,174

== CVC & CVP compare == CVC: central venous catheter CVP: central venous pressure So need to insert CVC before CVP can be measured

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

689,626,733

== To Dawnseeker2000 == please explain the action of you revert Taiwan part If you keeping act rude without reason I see you in the Village pump

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,632,270

|maindate= 22 November 2015

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

689,634,198

` :A large number of links does not prove primary topic. Both the musical & film could be considered primary topic at this point and as there are 4 articles with the same title a disambiguation page is clearly needed. U did not dispute the move, hence I carried out the proper process prior to disam. Frankly u have been nothing but antagonistic and provided no reasoning on my talk page why the move was controversial in any way. Other than making a point about I haven't edited the article before. Also removing the incoming links template is not helpful as the bot will re add it, on its next sweep. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,634,449

` ::Also looking at your user page it would appear there are potential Wp:Own issues here as well. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,643,126

` :In keeping with ``unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.`` WP:BLP, I corrected her results and removed the phrase regarding world records. Bestowing such a title to Mullins takes away from the real World Record breaker that year, Iryna Leantsiuk. http://www.paralympic.org/ipc_results/results2pdf.php?sport=athletics&competition;=1996PG&gender;=f&discipline;=&event;=Long+Jump&eclass;=F42-46 I left the part of the phrase regarding her retiring in 1998 since I could not refute it (although it perhaps should be sourced ala citation needed?) `

2,015

false

article

random

test

false

689,686,113

::For the all bullying you have done on Wikipedia, did you expect Karma not to come back?

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

689,686,444

:Why am I being censored MONGO? Sitush - answer man...For all the bullying you have done on Wikipedia, did you not expect Karma to return?

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

689,691,935

` ===Response to AN/I=== The edit in question is a reference to an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia I was watching at the time. I get that it's probably not the best use of a user page, but I honestly don't really care that much about what's on my user page; I'm here to edit the wiki. I can also acknowledge that saying ``real girls have vaginas`` could be seen as hurtful or intimidating to other users, which is in no way my intent. I don't have any issues changing my user page if it means moving on from all this debate and getting back to editing. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,702,346

*Note: I have asked for input at Wikiproject Chemistry. I'd be grateful if this edit request could remain open until we've had some feedback from someone there.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

689,702,624

== A page you started (G. Peignot et Fils) has been reviewed! == Thanks for creating G. Peignot et Fils, Pascalfroissart! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: This is an English language article, so even though it is a Frenchman speaking, don't use guillemets. To reply, leave a comment on De la Marck's . Learn more about page curation.

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

689,706,994

@ Because I read online that Pixar was credited for doing some work on this game! The credits of the game said so to on this website (https://www.chronocompendium.com/Term/Chrono_Cross_Credits.html) and IMDb said this too. If any Wikipedia user has the game they need to see if this true. I got it from websites like IMDb and Chrono Compendium that said PIXAR did some work on it.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,709,577

:: >It is difficult to assume good faith when you constantly make patronizing remarks, insults, and accusations.It's also equality difficult when people lie to me and accuse me of wrongdoings and stalk me and try to , I will be the better man and forgive you for all your wrongdoings at me.>I have not seen a single interaction that you have engaged in that did not include this sort of disruptive behavior.Again please stop accusing me and stop spreading misinformation, just because you never saw Chinese person doesn't mean Chinese person doesn't exist. It;s not my fault that you are to eager to spread misinformation about me.>You ask if this is something personal to meYes I ask if there is a personal issue you have me that you want to deal with it in your talk page as I came here to inquire about it. You are ready to bring up past incidents and fuel the fire. These behavior reminded me of middle school students or people who hod grudge for long.>yet at least a dozen editors complain about your behavior at the discussions above.Again you are using an Argumentum ad populum which is a fallacy.>That should tell you something.It tells me nothing or did you expect me to roll down and worship you?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,711,999

` ::::::::: >``Manumission encouraged`` is a pov title. ``Manumission`` alone is not.Manumission encouraged is an NPOV title, I love the fact that when I brought balance in the article you get angry and revert and change but when the article had the ``Manumission discouraged`` you never said anything. Shows you exactly how biased you are and selective you are. TWO WHOLE CHAPTERS in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim dedicated to encouraging Muslims to manumit their slaves.>``Manumission`` accurately indicates that slave freeing was possible under Islamic lawIt's not only possible, it is encouraged. That is why it is suppose to be there>but ``Manumission encouraged`` suggest that there was disproval of slavery under Islamic law and customs.This is again is false, I never said anything about approval or disapproval, we are looking at Muhammad's dealing with the slaves. The institution for slavery existed but with rules and guidelines to follow, and the freeding of slaves is encouraged in both the hadith and the Quran>In reality enslavement was normal behavior, and arguably a vital reason for the success of early Islam.This is laughable at best, the early success of Islam has more to do with the battles, the people, and their religion.>There was no slavery under early Christianity when it stood alone and unchallenged.I'm sure that Jesus was put on the cross and embarrassed by the Romans, not sure on what legal precident he had to challenge the Empire, which survived upto Muhammad's time and were still dealing with slaves>Islam by its creation created an ``other``What other?>While this article is not about that, not about slavery and IslamYes I realize that>it is about things reportedly said by Muhammad concerning slaveryThat is why I'm objected and trying to remove a hadith dealing with ways a wife can give a gift to her uncle., giving gifts to memebrs of your family after giving them to the needy is mentioned in the hadith sources which is backed up by this hadith, upon investigating the commentary of Bukhari in Fath al-Bari>or what later commentators have said about itWhat they said is important to understand what exactly was happening. And it forms as an evidence that this hadith has no place in this article.>so any appropriate sayings/hadiths that mention manumission have a right to be included in the Manumission section.The hadith doesn't deal with manumission it deals with the giving of gifts. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

689,712,774

::: I agree we should wait for citations.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

689,713,270

*Support The same thing should happen to the Huns, and Safavid article, the people/dynasty should be separate from the Empire. As the person a who is supporting above me says they are different subject

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,713,616

== Hey please stop VANDALIZING == stop it

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,714,498

== The flag? == How fictitious is the flag, you removed in the Sanjak of Bosnia article

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

689,715,908

`:: Hi Iryna, it's a lovely day right?>I had a feeling that we might cross paths again over this new user.This is Wikipedia and we share a common Cossack interest.>It appears that he's systematically working through historical articles and giving them a slanted Ottoman Empire spin.Iryna, please stop lying about me, how can I make Ali article and give it ``a slanted Ottoman Empire spin``? how can I make Mughal article and give it ``a slanted Ottoman Empire spin``? How can I make thousands of article and give them ``a slanted Ottoman Empire spin`` ?????? I thought we setteled this issue already, you gave me advice and instruction from the guidelines but as usual I gave you my hand and you throw dirt at me?>I had to postpone discussions regarding the unbalanced structure of the article in question as I had my hands full in other sanctions areas.And as usual I will be there providing my references. How can you make a balances article more balances? Let me guess by adding more biased content, Iryna, please wake up and let's have a serious discussion, leave the insults at home., with your logic if I read about the Mongol Empire and edit the Kiev page on the date of the battles they lost, I must be giving ``a slanted Mongol Empire spin``, anyone who isn't pro-Ukranian must be against you, I don't abide by these false dichotomy claims you write about me. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

689,716,452

` :can live with the current version or use of ``reportedly`` (which does not, as suggested above, have negative connotations; in common English usage it means ``according to what has been said`` or quiet literally ``it has been reported,`` don't get the issue with this). Placing emphasis on non-notable reporters in the lead is not the way to go. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,717,415

::::: No offense taken, I would say anytime you want.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,726,294

` ===Response to AN/I=== The edit in question is a reference to an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia I was watching at the time. I get that it's probably not the best use of a user page, but I honestly don't really care that much about what's on my user page; I'm here to edit the wiki. I can also acknowledge that saying ``real girls have vaginas`` could be seen as hurtful or intimidating to other users, which is in no way my intent. I don't have any issues changing my user page if it means moving on from all this debate and getting back to editing. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,726,491

` ::I'm using it only in context to the situation in which it is relevant. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,762,659

` == Proof on me not being ``virtual newbie`` == I hope we can settle this rumor created by Who was quick to tarnish my image and accuse of sock puppetry. I made this just for you, in your own talk page, so you don't fall for what I call misinformation, here is my narutopedia [ushttp://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/User:ZabuzaTheDemon user page] and notice my new edit and your name, also you can check the history of the page here, it is almost a year since I edited my Narutopedia user page, also here is my contributions page. So in conclusion: # I'm not ``virtual newbie`` # I have previous simple knowledge of editing, my knwoeldge increased exponentily in Wikipedia mother of all Wikis # fun fact: I was just using the Virutal editor in Narutopedia, it wasn't a rocket Science in the sens all I did was add word here and there and never had to edit the source manually ever except in Wikipedia. Hopefully you will reach a positive conclusion and abandon this rumor or you can continue spreading misinformation about me with , your choice `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,766,598

and wouldn't have wanted to learn about any other online community to start with.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

689,800,424

` by the way if you have son or daughter, you can say the same thing with them `` hey son(daughter) you English are so bad you should learn Chinese`` by the way I grateful for your contributions too ) cheer `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,804,121

:It seems this should be asked at Talk:Coño.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

689,805,875

== Age of Ultron == IMDb classification doesn't mean a shit. I've provided a source and imdb is not a reliable source because it is user-generated content. Read more about wikipedia, if I have a source that says Schindler's List is a comedy film, I can use it to list the film as so, as IMDb is concrned with verifiability and not truth.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,827,505

` :::::::::the sources are out of date, the figures are speculative estimates at best, furthermore, the latest headline i can find about the ``world's biggest star,`` in August 2015, claims it's Bradley Cooper! any such claim, about any individual, is, if you will excuse my French, bullshit. We should NOT be endorsing any such claim as FACT! Reportedly is what it is, these are entertainment news reports, it's BS news, utter crap, bottom of the barrel celebrity muck, it is NOT real journalism. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,832,309

REDIRECT Talk:The Gold Diggers (1919 play)

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

689,833,709

` :::::::::::seriously, wtf has Cruise got to do with any of this?? That's not even an FA, not even GA! Let me reiterate, I came to this FA via the Wiki cover page, as I'm sure did many, we should not have this kind of BS in the lead, not sure why people have difficulty understanding why it's problematic: its an FA, it's a BLP, therefore ropey claims, serve no place here without stating exactly the nature of the ropey claims (celebrity news reports). I'm getting the impression objectivity is lost here because it's essentially a fan page we are dealing with. Any edits that are perceived, erroneously, to be an attempt to undermine his aura of omnipotence is is taken as a personal attack. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,847,393

` == November 2015 == Hello, Callmemirela! It is nice to meet you. Your help in improving the page for Criminal Minds (season 11), specifically the episode section, is much appreciated!I'm glad you kept me on my toes about putting the episode summary in my own words, so as not to violate any copyright laws; for that I'm quite grateful to you. Criminal Minds is, by far, my favorite show and I love to help keep fellow fans informed. However, in my entire time editing Criminal Minds pages - which has been a little while; while I am fairly new to Wikipedia, this account was created with the (2) at the end because my previous account of the same name was inaccessible because I forgot my password lol - I have not once, by any editor, been asked/required to provide refernces for the production codes. Title, writer, director, and air date absolutely require references! But the production code is usually confirmed in one of the references whether it be title, writer, director, air date or any combination therein, added to the fact that the air dates can help determine the order in which the episodes will air, they are almost always confirmed. Although, I have come to understand there can be an exception in which the production codes can serve quite useful! This is when episodes air out of order, an example of which would be in Season 10, 1006, ``Boxed In``, was aired before 1005, ``If the Shoe Fits``, because ``Boxed In`` was the Halloween episode and it was scheduled to air on 11/05 whereas ``If the Shoe Fits`` was scheduled to air on 10/29; to resolve this, they merely switched their air dates, however, the production codes remained the same, therefore letting people know that they were aired out of order to accommodate Halloween. In that case, I believe it was briefly required to include references with the production codes. That, however, was the only time I've ever been required to provide a reference for a production code. I've posted references for all of the upcoming production codes to satisfy your need for me to do so and prove to you that I would not post those codes without knowing that their validity can eventually be found through other references. In conclusion, I absolutely agree with you that I needed to avoid violating copyright by denoting the summaries in a vernacular (lexicon; vocabulary; my own words) more unique to me, basically, to make them be more so in my own words, but I don't agree that the production codes need referencing. You are the first person who has ever asked me to do so. I do want you to know, though, that I always use reliable references for my episode title, writer, director and/or air date contributions, and that I take copyright violation (avoiding it!) very seriously! I really appreciate your willingness to help make the page as accurate as possible; that is my objective as well. I just don't think that it is necessary to reference the production codes, since all episodes have aired in order, thus far, and we (the fans) have been given no reason to believe they won't continue to do so. When it is required due to scheduling changes, I'd be happy to post it. I hope we can resolve this minor misunderstanding. Happy editing! Bef3481(2) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

689,852,848

::::::::: That is why some of us are here and thanks to KansasBear, we can have a civil disucssion and ensure the quality of the article.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

689,855,377

:* , sock puppet (?)

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

689,882,887

:Her first stint was 63 episodes as Jen Handley broadcast during 1995-96 (I've changed it to mid-1990s in the lead), her second stint was two episodes in 2012 as Olivia Bell (see here).

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,897,823

== What if Halloween 6 had an 138 minute version? == Ahould it be a good idea to mix Producer's Cut into Workprint Version?

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

689,902,860

:It seems fine.

2,015

false

user

random

train

false

689,908,580

== November 2015 == Well there, 75.80.125.107, have it your way. I find your sudden interest in removing my contribution humorous, as I know it is valid or else I would not have put it in the summary; believe it or not I have better things to do than to insist on posting untrue statements on Wikipedia. It was born (in my own words) from statements, which can be found on various websites, made by Erica Messer, the person who happens to be the Showrunner for Criminal Minds. It's no big deal, though; I understand why you took it down and I can always update it after the episode airs. Just thought I'd share that. Please know that I do not intend for this message to be malicious. Thanks for contributing! May peace be with you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

689,909,966

== economists are bad mathematicians == economists can only add, multiply, take logarithms, and (sometimes, very rarely) , indeed they obtain such stupid equations, meaning nothing except that their model (comparable to the worst climatics models) is meaning-less.

2,015

false

article

random

dev

false

689,915,166

== Racial controversy and resignation == This section is very good and does not hold back. I vote we keep it as-is until further developments.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

689,941,637

I didn't change it hence this BS claim of me saying i that I keep adding it when in fact i just haven't changed it is not the same thing...if i make n edit and i just forget to leave something on there or don't change it because i was focusing on other edits don't mean I KEEP DOING IT...big difference and to be frankly this is getting a little childish GROW UP...to be honest you're pissing me off now i'm trying to be nice but you keep doing this to harass.....i don't have time for your other people's nagging and BS ok? some of you are worse than little girls grow a pair and stop harassing users and i could be a lot more blunt and harsh...i'm not doing nothing wrong i dont vandalize when i contributed quite alot here and been using wikipedia for a long time ...i don't make up facts and just because i haven't got the time to reference some of them especially since i pretty much had to learn everything in editing here from other users on my own so stop harassing me for petty BS that's irrelevant..all you and your simple minded brethren should worry about is about people who purposely put fake info or make it up...the edits i put i get them from sources but it's not so simple to cite or source very single edit i ever done in hereso for the last time..stop harassing people for petty nonsense you're acting like children...most things i edit are in fact correct and btw i do a lot more research to finding out this stuff than most of you because apparently i can actually complete and be specific about facts that most would want to know...i don't do half-assed edits so stop harassing users who actually CONTRIBUTE for the betterment of this and stop envying others who are more capable and more determined than some of you are..just because some of you didn't come up with it doesn't mean you gotta give them trouble or envy them or even worse claim their effort and work and pawn it as your own...there;s's a difference between influencing others and taking credit for others people's work and effort...i seen edits i made that were never there before i put them and influenced others that noticed my efforts and kept them because it was more detailed and specific..the more specific the better in my opinion so cut this shit out already worry about people who purposely try to troll or put fake info etc etc..because that's not me ok? why would i want to sabotage a website that i relied on for looking at information for years? this is a website where we all contribute ...YOUR WAY as lazy and half-assed as it might be in some articles doesn't mean its the only way to edit..some of us put more effort and try to be as detailed as possible...stop it already...some of you are getting pretty annoying ...i come here to look up things and to edit to make some articles better and more fleshed out...none of you do it so someone has to finish the half -assed article i seen around...i hope i made myself clear this time..go bother others who are ACTUALLY messing up the articles purposely because i sure as hell am not one of those people...and don't worry i'll show the sources i get my info from since some of you are too damn lazy to look it up...get it? got it ? good pffftt...the nerve of some of you...how immature..envying others because you couldn't come up with it or put that effort yourselves...now that's childish...grow up we're suppose to help one another and inspire the other to do better..it's not my fault some of the articles here are incomplete with empty info boxes etc etc..blame yourselves for that..i..unlike some of you, believe in making articles as complete and detailed and specific as possible..

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

689,944,016

:In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact Synetrix Holdings Limited (UK) to report abuse.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

689,965,587

` :re:unsigned links provided above, what they actually say. :*1) ``...one of the world’s biggest movie stars.`` :*2) ``...is probably the biggest film star in the world.`` :*3) ``...one of the biggest actors in the world…one of the richest actors in the world...and only comes second to American comedian Jerry Seinfeld on the list of top earning actors.`` :*4) ``...His personal earnings were estimated to be 26 million dollars by Forbes in 2015 and it ranked him as the world's 18th most highly paid actor.`` :*5) ``SRK is known to be not the nation’s biggest star but the world’s biggest movie star.`` :*6) this link is a reprint of item 4. :*7) ``Khan, who is hailed as the world's biggest superstar.`` :again, nothing definitive here. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

689,973,934

Sorry BJ, while it is true that there have been attempts to refute my propositions, none have been successful. Also it is undoubtedly true that the cold fusion community has attempted to ignore my comments, using strawmen arguments and ad hominem attacks to justify their actions. But we all know those aren't valid reasons to ignore technical criticisms. So the net result is that the field continues to exist on supposition and blind faith. To date, I haven't seen any conclusive evidence from the field.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

689,999,195

== Gay sexual practices == Please, read the talk page to the entry. There's a consensus among all editors who have weighed in on the subject that the 'health risks' subsections need to be trimmed down to respect Wikipedia's Undue weight policies. All I did was that, besides adding content and sources to the main subsection, which you removed.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

690,003,491

:: Glad we cleared that up!

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

690,073,937

What an amazing coincidence!!! It is an extraordinary coincidence that someone living in Keller, Texas ~ the same place where Bishop Ackerman lives ~ has chosen to vandalise my user page. What are the odds of this? Absolutely amazing!

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

690,077,864

{{subst:arbcom notice|Military Occupation of Gaza}}.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

690,077,947

! Template:Arbcom notice

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false